Emeryville City Council
July 21, 2026

City of Emeryville Page 1 of 5
Members:

Mayor Sukhdeep Kaur
Vice Mayor Matthew Solomon
Council Member David Mourra
Council Member Kalimah A. Priforce
Council Member Courtney Welch

CITY OF EMERYVILLE
AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL
--AMENDED--
Emeryville City Hall
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 596-4300 phone
(510) 450-7831 fax
www.emeryville.org
Tuesday, July 21, 2026 6:00 PM - Special Study Session
7:00 PM - Regular Meeting Council Chambers
This meeting is being conducted in a hybrid model with both in-person and virtual attendance.

Join the meeting remotely using Zoom or in-person at
1333 Park Avenue, Emeryville, California
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://emeryville-org.zoom.us/j/84650369277?pwd=a6QXyRFL7xfzDvFlyt-QgPpF95LNtg.CcK4CDiZJSKQpsX Webinar ID: 846 5036 9277
Passcode: 062018
To request to speak during public comment, use the “raise hand” function in Zoom and wait for your name to be called.

To join by phone:

Telephone: 669-900-6833
Webinar ID: 846 5036 9277
Passcode: 062018
To request to speak during public comment, press *9 and listen for the last 4 digits of your phone number to be called. Press *6 to unmute your phone to speak.

Public comment can be submitted online via our written comment card at www.emeryville.org/citycouncil.

Written comments can also be submitted by email to [email protected] or to the City Clerk at [email protected]. If you would like to make public comment in writing, please send them by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting.

A complete copy of the agenda packet is available for viewing at the Information Center at City Hall, located at 1333 Park Avenue, Emeryville, California, and on the city’s website at www.emeryville.org/citycouncil. The meeting is shown live on the City of Emeryville television channel (ETV), cable channel 27, and will be rebroadcast according to the published ETV schedule of programs. Council meetings will also be available to view through live media streaming accessible from the City of Emeryville website at www.emeryville.org/citycouncil.

You can subscribe to receive Emeryville City Council agendas via email by going to our website at City Council AGENDA July 21, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 2 of 5
www.emeryville.org/citycouncil. Simply fill out your information, check “City Council Agendas”, and click the “Subscribe” button.

All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR are considered to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown prior to the time the Council votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Presiding Officer calls for comments from those persons who are in support of or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the Hearing is closed and brought back to Council level for discussion and action. There is no further comment permitted from the audience unless requested by the Council.

No animals shall be allowed at or brought in to a public meeting by any person except (i) as to members of the public or City staff utilizing the assistance of a service animal, which is defined as a guide dog, signal dog, or other animal individually trained to provide assistance to an individual with a disability; or (ii) as to police officers utilizing the assistance of a dog(s) in law enforcement duties.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a person requiring an accommodation, auxiliary aid, or service to participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk ’s Office at 510-596-4300, as far in advance as possible, but no later than 72 hours before the scheduled event. The best effort to fulfill the request will be made. Assistive listening devices are available for anyone with hearing difficulty from the City Clerk prior to the meeting and must be returned to the City Clerk at the end of the meeting.

Public Comment: Each speaker is limited to two minutes to present their comments to the City Council at each speaking opportunity. At the discretion of the Presiding Officer, time limits may be further adjusted.

The regular and special meetings of the Emeryville City Council also serve as regular or special meetings of the City of Emeryville as Successor Agency to the Emeryville Redevelopment Agency, the Community Development Commission, and the Public Finance Authority when items are listed on the agenda.

The City Council welcomes comments, including criticism, about the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the City, or of the acts or omissions of the City Council. Speakers shall not use threatening, profane, or abusive language which disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of a City Council or related meeting. The City is committed to maintaining a workplace free of unlawful harassment and is mindful that City staff regularly attend Council meetings. Discriminatory statements or conduct that would potentially violate the Fair Employment and Housing Act – i.e., statements or conduct that is hostile, intimidating, oppressive, or abusive – is per se disruptive to a meeting and will not be tolerated.

City Council AGENDA July 21, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 3 of 5

1. CALL TO ORDER - STUDY SESSION 6:00 PM

2. ROLL CALL

3. STUDY SESSION

3.1. STUDY SESSION TO REVIEW A PROPOSAL FROM SUTTER HEALTH FOR AN

AMENDMENT TO THE CHIRON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)/PRELIMINARY

DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

4. ADJOURNMENT

1. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM

2. ROLL CALL

3. APPROVAL OF FINAL AGENDA

4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY

5. COUNCIL MEMBER SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS ON MEETING ATTENDANCE

6. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

7. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

8. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT AGENDA AND ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA

9. CONSENT CALENDAR

9.1. ALL ORDINANCES DEEMED READ BY TITLE ONLY AND ALL FURTHER READING WAIVED

9.2. WARRANTS

9.3. ACTION MINUTES OF THE JUNE 7, 2026, CITY COUNCIL MEETING

9.4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AS SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE EMERYVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCEPTING THE FMW SITE DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION PROJECT, CIP NO. 23 EPW003 AS COMPLETE;

AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH THE

ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK

9.5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AUTHORIZING AN

AMENDMENT TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN TO ADD A POLICE

COMMUNICATIONS DISPATCH SUPERVISOR CLASSIFICATION WITH A MONTHLY SALARY RANGE OF $8,944 TO - $11,128 AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S COMPENSATION PLAN IN CONFORMANCE WITH CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5

9.6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE APPROVING A FY26-27 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO INCREASE CAPITAL OUTLAY BY $108,862 IN THE City Council AGENDA July 21, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 4 of 5
EMERYVILLE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE FUND 477 FOR NETWORK EQUIPMENT

UPGRADES

9.7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCEPTING

ORIGINAL ART WORKS BY ARTISTS FREDDIE SIZEMORE, FERNANDA MARTINEZ, AND

EUGENE TSSUI AS THE COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION FROM THEIR ROTTEN CITY CULTURAL DISTRICT RESIDENCIES FOR INCLUSION IN THE CITY’S PERMANENT ART COLLECTION AND APPROPRIATING $2,500 FROM FUND 243 – ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 OPERATING BUDGET FOR INSTALLATION,

PROTECTION, AND PLAQUES FOR THE DONATED WORKS

9.8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AUTHORIZING A TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO THE MAY 19, 2026 VISUAL ART GRANT AWARDS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION NO. 26-037 TO APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $6,000 FROM FUND 243 – ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND FOR THE 2026 VISUAL ART GRANT

TO MILA MOLDENHAWER

9.9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF EMERYVILLE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,950.91 WITH ANDES

CONSTRUCTION INC, AND ACCEPTING THE EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT AND

MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING SEWER MAINTENANCE ACCESS HOLES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS BY ANDES CONSTRUCTION IN THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AS COMPLETE;

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH THE ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK.

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS

10.1. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE ESTABLISHING THE FISCAL YEAR 2027 PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PBID)

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY FOR THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS WITHIN THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WITH A 3% RATE INCREASE ON ALL PARCELS, AND APPROVING THE 2027 PRELIMINARY BUDGET SUBMITTED BY THE EMERYVILLE

TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (ETMA) AND AUTHORIZING A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO INCREASE THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 BUDGET FOR THE PROPERTY BASED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (FUND #805) BY $70,620

11. ACTION ITEMS

11.1. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE ORDERING THE

SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026 AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 26-58, A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1 BUSINESS TAXES OF TITLE 3 FINANCE; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS; AND

AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF DIRECT ARGUMENT FOR OR AGAINST THE MEASURE

AND REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS

11.2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH BAY CITIES PAVING AND GRADING, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY AN ADDITIONAL $1,129,906.44 FOR A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $10,957,395.14; ACCEPTING THE 2024 SUSTAINABLE STREETSCAPES PROJECT, PROJECT NO. EPW-23008 (CIP NO. 24221005) AS COMPLETE; AUTHORIZING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH THE ALAMEDA City Council AGENDA July 21, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 5 of 5

COUNTY CLERK

12. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS

12.1. ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMMISSION/COMMITTEE VACANCIES

13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS

14. ADJOURNMENT
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
City of Emeryville

C A L I F O R N I A

M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: LaTanya Bellow, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Chadrick Smalley, Community Development Director SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION TO REVIEW A PROPOSAL FROM SUTTER HEALTH

FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CHIRON PLANNED UNIT

DEVELOPMENT (PUD)/PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council provide comments and direction regarding the project after hearing a presentation from the applicant and receiving public testimony.

BACKGROUND
Summary/Study Session Framing:

Sutter Health acquired the Emery Yards property from Biomed Realty in 2025 with the intention of building a hospital and ambulatory medical offices. On this site, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit was originally approved for the Chiron Corporation in August 1995. In 2006, Chiron was acquired by the Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis.

In November 2013, the diagnostics unit of Novartis, including a portion of the property covered by the PUD, was sold to Grifols, a multinational pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturer based in Barcelona, Spain. The remaining Novartis portion of the PUD was acquired by Biomed Realty (“BMR”) in March 2019. In February 2021, the Planning Commission approved a Final Development Plan (FDP) permit to build a parking structure and four new “Research and Development” (R&D) buildings. BMR constructed the parking structure and one new R&D shell building between 2022-24. Because the site is currently entitled for “Research and Development” uses and not for hospital and ambulatory medical office uses, Sutter is requesting amendment of the existing PUD permit to allow for these uses.

Regulatory History:

Chiron Planned Unit Development/Preliminary Development Plan (the PUD/PDP) The Emeryville Municipal Code (EMC) establishes the planned unit development (PUD) procedures, which allow for the creation of PUD zones to encourage the creative development of large sites so as to permit flexibility in physical design, achieve attractive designs which encourage large-scale site planning, and ensure the applicable provisions on the General Plan are established early in the formation of such development proposals. Under the EMC, a preliminary development plan (PDP) for the PUD is Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

considered by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. (EMC Section 9-1.1001) Approval of the PDP constitutes the zoning for the site, and one or more subsequent final development plans (FDP), corresponding to the development phases approved in the PDP, shall be considered by the Planning Commission. (EMC 9-

7.1003)
Chiron Corporation, a research and development firm specializing in biopharmaceuticals, vaccines and blood testing, was founded in Emeryville in 1981, and in 1985 they moved into the old Shell Oil research building on Horton Street that had been acquired and renovated by Wareham Development. On August 15, 1995, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 95-006 approving a PUD for Chiron’s large life sciences campus, the Emeryville Life Sciences Center Planned Unit Development/Preliminary Development Plan (the “PUD/PDP”), also referred to as the Chiron PUD/PDP (PUD 93-2), subject to conditions of approval. The PUD/PDP encompasses most of the area bounded by Hollis Street, 45th Street, Stanford Avenue, and the railroad. On the same date (August 15, 1995), the City Council also passed Ordinance No. 95-007 approving a Development Agreement (“DA”) with Chiron Corporation. The DA vested the entitlements for a 30-year period and provided for various public benefits indexed to the phased completion of the buildings in the PUD/PDP.

This PUD/PDP calls for construction of 14 new buildings, including seven laboratory buildings, three office towers, structured parking, and support facilities over a 30-year period. Please see Sheet 4 of the attached plans, PDP Illustrative Plan at Full Buildout (Attachment 1). Construction under the PUD/PDP has included one laboratory building at Hollis and 53rd Street ("Building 4") and a central utility plant on Chiron Way (“Building 7a”), both approved via a FDP by the City Council on August 20, 1996 (Resolution No. 96-143); one parking structure on Horton Street (“Building 12a”) by a second FDP and amendment to the PUD/PDP approved by the Council on June 5, 2001 (Resolution No. 01- 076); and a park at 53rd and Hollis Streets (“Hollis Green”) by a FDP approved by the Council on August 2, 2005 (Resolution No. 05-142).

BMR Acquisition and Final Development Plan (FDP) Approval In 2006, Chiron was acquired by the multinational Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis. In November 2013, the diagnostics unit of Novartis was sold to Grifols, a multinational pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturer based in Barcelona, Spain.

On March 15, 2019 the remaining Novartis potion of the PUD was acquired by BMR, a developer of life sciences properties. On February 25, 2021 the Planning Commission approved an FDP to build four new multi-tenant research and development buildings and a 1,991-space supporting parking garage (Resolution Number FDP19-002).

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Table 1 below summarizes the size and status of the six BMR buildings:

Building Maximum
Height
# Occupied
Floors
Maximum
Size
Built/Not Built - Year
B1 178 feet 11 300,000 sq. ft. Not Built
B2/3 114 feet 7 261,300 sq. ft. Built (Shell) – July 2024 B8A 135 feet 7 221,000 sq. ft. Not Built
B8B 103 feet 5 129,500 sq. ft. Not Built
B13/14
(parking
garage)
103 feet 11 levels,
including
grade and
roof
1,991 spaces Built – August 2024
B 4
(Legorreta
building)
106 feet
(approx.)
6 292,430 sq. ft. Built - 1998
PDU Building 30 feet (approx.) 1 13,776 sq. ft. Built – 1983 Hollis Green N/A N/A 30,044 sq. ft. Built – 2007
BMR built the parking garage (Building B13/14) in 2023, followed by one multi-tenant research and development building (Building B2/3) in 2024 and the campus came to be known as Emery Yards. Building B2/3 is a constructed as a “shell” building and has remained vacant.

Sutter Health acquired Emery Yards in February 2025 with the intention of constructing a medical campus at the site. Today, Sutter Health and Grifols share the properties addressed by the PUD/PDP, with each firm owning different buildings and facilities. Sheet 7 of the attached plans (Site Plan – Sutter Owned Properties Existing Conditions, Attachment 1), illustrates the properties owned by Sutter Health and those controlled by Grifols.

Sutter Health has now submitted an application to construct a medical facility that includes a new hospital and a new medical office building and would reuse existing buildings for medical office use as well as parking. As the Chiron PUD/PDP entitlements allow only for research and development, small scale manufacturing and office uses, Sutter Health’s proposal requires an amendment to the Chiron PUD/PDP.

DISCUSSION
Project Description:

Project Site and Parcel Ownership
The project site for the Sutter proposal comprises approximately 12 acres of the 22-acre Chiron PUD/PDP site and includes the buildings (B4, B2/3, B13/14 and PDU Building), building sites B1 and B8) and the Hollis Green park. See Sheet 7 of the attached plans (entitled Site Plan – Sutter Owned Properties Existing Conditions, Attachment 1).

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Sutter Bay Hospitals owns the site previously proposed for Building 8A and 8B (now proposed as Building 8 for the hospital), and Sutter Bay Medical Foundation owns the sites of Buildings 1, 2/3, 4 and 13/14 (parking garage), the PDU Building and the Hollis Green.

Project Proposal and Operating Characteristics
The proposal includes construction of two new buildings (B8 and B1), re-use of the two existing buildings (B4 and B2/3), and demolition of the PDU building to create space for a shuttle depot. Please see Sheet 8 of the attached plans (entitled Site Plan – Proposed Emeryville Medical Center Project Site and Building, Attachment 1) Table 2 below summarizes key characteristics of each building proposed for Sutter’s portion of the PUD/PDP:

Building
Name
Sq. ft.1 Height/
Stories
Uses Hours of
Operation
Population2
New Buildings
B8
Hospital
785,000 330 feet/
15 + 2
stories
(mechanical
+ helipad
- 325-bed Hospital
- Labor and Delivery
- Neo-natal care unit
- Postpartum
- Medical-Surgical
- Intensive Care Unit
- ER and Operating
Rooms
- Program elements
including a clinical
laboratory, inpatient
pharmacy,
administration,
receiving and central
supply areas, central
utility plant, and a
loading dock.
- Helipad – located at a
height of 294 feet at a
frequency of
approximately one
round-trip flight per day,
including nighttime
hours - patient transport
24/7
3 shifts
2,464 daily
personnel;
658
personnel
during peak
shift
488 visitors
daily
B1
(Two
variants)
55,600 50 feet/
3 stories
Medical office (MOB)
and parking (53
spaces)
7am to
7pm,
M-F;
122
employees
daily
Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

OR
Housing (57-units) and
parking (53 spaces)
9 ADA spaces for B2/3
8am to
Noon
Saturdays
1088
visitors daily
Existing Buildings
B4 292,500 MOB and associate
support space
7am to
7pm,
M-F;
8am to
Noon
Saturdays
643
employees
daily
5,829
visitors daily
B2/3 270,700 114 feet/
7 stories
- MOB
- Surgical center
-Urgent care
- Pharmacy
- Blood lab
- Specialty clinics
(OB/GYN; prenatal;
urology; ENT;
pediatrics
7am to
7pm,
M-F;
8am to
Noon
Saturdays
PDU
Building Site
20,700 Shuttle Depot TBD N/A
B13/14 710,641 103 feet/
11 levels
1,991 spaces;
1200 sq. ft. commercial
space
24/7
Regular
business
hours
N/A
1 Total Net Square Feet of Buildings: 1,405,800 (excludes garage) 2 Total Daily Personnel Population = 2,825
Total Daily Visitor Population = 12,060
For more details regarding proposed uses please see Attachment 2, Applicant’s Project Description. Page 15 of this attachment includes additional details and assumptions regarding the proposed helipad on Building B8.

Site Circulation
Vehicular Circulation: Sheet 24 of the attached plans (entitled Site Circulation – Proposed Public/Visitor/Employee Vehicular Circulation, Attachment 1) illustrates how vehicles will access the site. The proposal involves removal of the traffic diverter on Horton Street and conversion of Chiron Way into a south-bound one-way street to accommodate anticipated vehicular trips. The main entrance of the hospital (B8) is proposed at 53rd Street, and the Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

main entrance of existing Building B2/3 will be relocated from Hollis Street to Chiron Way.

The main entrance of existing Building 4 at Chiron Way will not be changed. Hollis and Horton Streets will continue to function as two-way streets with access to the garage occurring at two entrances on Horton Street.

Sheet 24 also shows the location of passenger pick-up and drop-offs located along 53rd Street and Chiron Way.

Ambulance Circulation: Primary routes for ambulances arriving at the hospital are Hollis Street and Peladeau Street/Chiron Way. Ambulances will arrive and park at the rear of Building 8 using Chiron Way. (See Sheet 25, entitled Site Circulation – Proposed Ambulance Circulation, Attachment 1). Horton and 53rd Streets are shown as being secondary access routes for ambulances.

Service Vehicles Circulation: Service vehicles will primarily use Hollis Street, Stanford Avenue, Chiron Way and a portion of Horton Street. Service loading bays are provided at Building B8 will be accessed via Horton Street, while loading docks at Building 4 and Building 2/3 will be accessed via Chiron Way. (See Sheet 26, entitled Site Circulation – Proposed Service Vehicle Circulation, Attachment 1).

Shuttle Circulation: Sutter is proposing to operate a dedicated shuttle service to transport staff and patients/visitors between the Emeryville campus and the Emeryville Amtrak Station, MacArthur BART Station, West Oakland BART Station and off-site parking facilities in Berkeley and Oakland. The exact locations for these pickup and drop off points are not yet identified.

Shuttle loading and unloading will occur at a new Shuttle Depot that will take the place of the existing PDU building, which will be demolished. At this time the applicant has not designed this facility but anticipates installing a landscaped perimeter fence or a decorative greenwall to provide separation between the park plaza and the Shuttle Depot.

Approximately 11 shuttles are anticipated to operate (with 20 passenger capacity) during employee peak hours to transport employees between satellite parking lots in Berkeley and Oakland and the Emeryville campus. During employee peak hours (6:00 AM to 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM), there would be a frequency of one shuttle every five minutes. During off-peak hours, the frequency of shuttles would potentially be one shuttle every 20 minutes.

The applicant anticipates adding additional shuttles to transport employees and visitors between the campus and the MacArthur BART station, which is the closest BART station with a frequency of one shuttle every 15 minutes during the peak hours. In addition, the project will offer an on-demand mini-shuttle service to transport employees between the campus and the Emeryville Amtrak Station and the West Oakland BART Station.

Shuttles to the off-site parking facilities would operate once the hospital is constructed and operational. The applicant states that shuttles “may need to operate before that to encourage medical office employees to use alternative transportation modes even if there is no parking deficit”.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

See Sheet 23 (entitled Site Circulation – Proposed Shuttle Circulation, Attachment 1) to see shuttle routes that will run along Hollis, Horton and 53rd Streets, and Stanford Avenue.

Bicycle Circulation: Sheet 21, Site Circulation – Proposed Bicycle Circulation, outlines existing bicycle circulation and identifies existing bicycle facilities including bicycle lanes, bicycle boulevard, separated (raised) bikeways and separated (street level) bikeways.

Chiron Way is not envisioned to be used by bicycles. This sheet also shows locations of bicycle parking at all buildings except the hospital. No details regarding the proposed number of short-term and long-term spaces have been provided at this time.

As noted under the Vehicular Parking section above, the existing traffic diverter on Horton Street is proposed to be removed to allow vehicular flows. No additional bicycle infrastructure improvements are proposed at this time, and the applicant’s project description includes consideration of standard measures to reduce bicycle/vehicular conflicts such as high-visibility green pavement markings, enhanced signage and minimizing curb radii and crossing widths. See also Applicant Project Description for additional details regarding potential measures (Attachment 2, Page 28).

Pedestrian Circulation: Sheet 22, Site Circulation – Proposed Pedestrian Circulation, outlines existing pedestrian pathways. The project proposes a new sidewalk along the hospital frontage on the west side of Chiron Way, extending from 53rd Street to the current sidewalk terminus just north of the proposed hospital site. The project would also install a midblock crossing on Chiron Way to facilitate pedestrian crossings between the hospital and the MOBs.

Open Space and Landscape Plan
Sheets 9 and 10 of the attached plans (Attachment 1) illustrate existing open space/landscape plan and conceptual open space/landscape plan respectively. A total of 16 street trees are proposed to be removed (10 on 53rd Street and 6 on Horton Street) to accommodate the new hospital. An additional 31 private trees are also proposed for removal, though their locations are not noted on the plans at this time. The project includes the planting of 50 new, private trees along Horton and 53rd Streets and adjacent to the proposed shuttle depot. An arborist report will need to be submitted that provides details on the size and replacement values of the street trees removed in order to assess the project’s compliance with the Urban Forestry Ordinance (UFO).

Conceptual Building Design Elevations
Sheets 28 to 38 of the attached plans (Attachment 1) provide a conceptual ground floor plan and stacking diagram for the hospital and preliminary elevations of the two new buildings. The hospital and the new MOB will operate as all-electric facilities, while existing buildings B4 and B2/3 would continue to utilize same power sources with which they were originally constructed.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Estimated Construction Schedule
Table 3: Construction Schedule
Building Start Work Total Construction
Time
Anticipated/Earliest
Construction Phase
B2/3
(5555 Hollis Street)
Tenant Improvements
(TIs) work starts 2
months after PUD
amendment approval
21 months Q3 2027- Q4 2029
B8 FDP submission after
PUD Amendment
approval
71 months Q1 2028 – Q4 2033
B4
(5300 Chiron Way)
TIs will proceed as
future program
requires and only after
hospital construction is
complete.

The building will be
used for administrative
purposes in the
interim.

Q3 2034- Q4 2035
B1 Start construction after
hospital is in operation
and B2/3 and B4 are
at full occupancy.

In the interim, the site
would be used as a
construction
coordination area.
24 months TBD
Preliminary General Plan and Zoning Analysis:

The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Office/Technology except for the existing Hollis Green park which is designated as Park/Open Space. The zoning for the site is Planned Unit Development PUD-3, established in 1995 and known as the Chiron PUD/PDP as mentioned in Section II (Regulatory History) of this staff report. The proposed uses of hospital and medical office buildings are consistent with the Office/Technology land use designation, but not consistent with the Chiron PUD/PDP allowed land uses. Therefore, the project requires a PUD Amendment for the proposed uses. Staff will continue to evaluate whether the proposed hospital, medical office, and residential variant are fully consistent with the General Plan land use designation or Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

whether additional General Plan or zoning (i.e. PUD) amendments are required to authorize the proposed use mix.

The maximum height permitted within the Chiron PUD/PDP is 225 feet and the underlying height zone in the Maximum Building Height Map in the General Plan is 50 feet (base)/100 (bonus). The proposed height of the hospital is 330 feet, which is higher than what is currently permitted in the PUD as well as higher than heights allowed by the Maximum Building Heights Map in the General Plan. The project therefore will require a General Plan Amendment (GPA). In order to approve a GPA, the Planning Commission and the City Council will need to make the following findings outlined in EMC Section 9-7.1205:
(a) The proposed amendment will contribute to the public health, safety, and general welfare or will be of benefit to the public;
(b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan's guiding principles, unless the guiding principles themselves are proposed to be amended; (c) The proposed amendment retains the internal consistency of the General Plan and is consistent with other adopted plans, unless concurrent amendment to those plans is also proposed and will result in consistency; (d) The proposed amendment has been reviewed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and (e) The proposed amendment complies with State law for the preparation, adoption, and amendment of general plans at California Government Code Section 65350 et seq.

The total build-out permitted by the Chiron PUD/PDP is 2.2 million square feet (excluding parking and open space). Sutter’s proposed net square footage of existing and proposed buildings is 1,405,800, and the existing square footage for Grifols-controlled buildings is 284,700 square feet. Therefore, the proposed build out will not exceed that permitted by the Chiron PUD/PDP (1,405,800+284,700 = 1,690,500).

The Chiron PUD/PDP specifies up to 0.81 parking spaces per employee. The existing parking garage (B13/14) accommodates 1,991 spaces and the project proposes an additional 53 spaces in the proposed MOB on site B1 and 52 spaces for housing variant for a total of 2,044 spaces for MOB and 2,043 for housing variant. The estimated number of employees at the Sutter campus is 2,825. So, the maximum number of parking spaces permitted by the PDP based on the parking ratio of 0.81 spaces per employee is 2,279 spaces. The proposed parking at the Sutter campus is 2,044 (MOB) or 2043 (housing) spaces, which is equivalent to about 0.72 spaces per employee and therefore is in compliance with the PUD/PDP specification.

The Chiron PUD/PDP also contains specifications relating to site design aspects including trees, landscaping, building setbacks and other topics. The proposed project’s compliance with these topics is pending further analysis and design development.

Environmental Review:

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires local jurisdictions to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of discretionary actions before approving Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

development projects. When a project may result in significant impacts, CEQA requires the agency to disclose those impacts, consider feasible mitigation measures and alternatives, and determine whether the project may be approved in light of that environmental analysis. CEQA is an informational process and does not predetermine whether the City will ultimately approve, deny or modify the project.

The City has retained Urban Planning Partners (UPP) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Sutter project. The cost of this analysis is borne by the applicant. Attachment 3 provides UPP’s scope of work that includes areas of analysis required by CEQA as well as a tentative schedule. As required by CEQA, an EIR scoping session is scheduled for the August 27th Planning Commission meeting to solicit comments on issues and areas that the EIR should analyze.

Community and Committee Comments:

Community Meeting
Consistent with past practice the City asked Sutter Health to conduct a community meeting introducing their proposal prior to any meetings with City committees or commissions. This was held on May 18, 2026 at 5300 Chiron Way, one of the existing buildings proposed to be repurposed as medical offices. Approximately 50 people attended in person and 75 people attended on-line. Comments made are summarized below. Please note this is not an exhaustive list of comments/issues raised and is provided to communicate key feedback and the overall tenor of the comments:

Impacts on 53rd Street. Several residents of Emery Bay Village and the Golden Gate Residential Association in Oakland expressed concerns about traffic impacts on 53rd Street due to existing congestion during school drop-off and pick-up hours.

Concerns regarding safety, parking and neighborhood character were also raised.

Height and Massing. Concerns were raised regarding the proposed height of the hospital and its shadow impacts. It was suggested that the proposed height is out of scale with the surrounding buildings. Questions were raised about the sufficiency of the geological support for a structure with the proposed massing. A commenter suggested considering relocating the hospital to the corner of Stanford Avenue and Hollis Street (B-1 site).

Community Benefit. Commentators noted Sutter’s non-profit tax status and the limited tax contribution it would provide to the City and expressed interest Sutter providing broader community value through a community benefits package or similar mechanism.

Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
The BPAC reviewed the Sutter Medical Center proposal at their June 1, 2026 meeting.

The applicant team presented the project's initial study and plan. Committee members and public commenters raised concerns across several topics, summarized below:

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

General Bicycle and Pedestrian Impacts. Given the project's location in the middle of existing bicycle boulevards, Committee members and public commenters expressed significant concern about bicycle and pedestrian safety and connectivity with the Stanford Avenue and Horton Street intersection was flagged as a critical area. A representative from Bike East Bay reiterated their offer to work with the applicant on potential project refinements and measures addressing bicycle and pedestrian safety and connectivity and requested that NACTO thresholds be maintained.

Horton Street Diverter. Multiple Committee members and commenters objected to the proposed removal of the Horton Street traffic diverter, with some suggesting additional diverters instead to protect surrounding neighborhoods from increased traffic.
53rd Street Corridor and School Impacts. Representatives from the Golden Gate Residential Association in Oakland and 53rd Street Residents raised concerns about existing street parking, traffic congestion and impacts on schools along 53rd Street, particularly during drop-off and pick-up.

Parking and Spillover Impacts. Questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the 1,991-space Horton Street garage, and spillover impacts beyond the immediate project vicinity, including 53rd Street to Martin Luther King Jr Way, Bay Street and the Loop.
53rd Street Residents submitted written comments to BPAC which are attached to this staff report. (Attachment 4).

Commission On Aging
The Commission on Aging reviewed the proposal at their June 10, 2026, meeting.

Commissioners and public commenters raised concerns across several topics, summarized below:

Community Benefit. Given Sutter's nonprofit status and limited tax contribution to the City, public commenters noted an expectation that Sutter would need to provide broader community value. Commissioners raised questions about Sutter’s support for older adults, such as being part of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) network or part of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) program. Questions were also raised regarding Sutter’s willingness to support seniors by providing regular programs at the Senior Center on different healthrelated issues such dementia etc. One Commissioner suggested that Sutter should consider starting these programs next year rather than waiting for the entitlement process to be completed.

Shuttles. Commenters appreciated that a shuttle was planned for but had questions about shuttle accessibility, hours of operation, the number of vehicles and whether the shuttle system would be integrated with existing transit, including Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Emery Go-Round, Paratransit and the existing shuttle system for Alta Bates Summit Medical Center (Alta Bates) in Berkeley.

Parking. Commenters raised concerns about parking costs, accessibility, and whether parking validation comparable to Alta Bates existing program would be available.

Traffic. Commenters raised extensive concerns about congestion along 53rd Street, the Powell Street off-ramps, and Hollis and Horton Streets and asked whether Sutter would share responsibility for required infrastructure improvements.

Safety. Commenters asked whether the project would include improved lighting and bus shelters in the site area and said that increased traffic at intersections would likely reduce pedestrian safety for older adults.

Timeline and Engagement. Commenters asked about the City's traffic study timeline, community engagement opportunities, and whether Sutter would maintain ongoing engagement with the Commission on Aging. 53rd Street Residents submitted written comments to the Commission on Aging which are attached to this staff report. (Attachment 5).

Parks and Recreation Committee
The Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed the Sutter Medical Center project on June 17, 2026. Committee and community members were generally supportive of the project at this early stage, but raised concerns they hoped could be integrated into the design, summarized below:

New Parks and Community Benefits. Given Sutter's nonprofit status, commenters asked that the project deliver broader community value, such as new parks, a children's play area, outdoor dining and gathering spaces, public restrooms and public access to proposed rooftop terraces. Commenters added that Sutter should use pockets of space between buildings not just for drainage or decorative plantings, but to create recreational spaces for people to gather, eat, or find respite.

Changes to Existing Parks. Questions were raised about whether mature trees would be replaced with younger ones and whether new landscaping would be only native plants. Commenters raised concerns about the changes to Chiron Plaza and the loss of it feeling like park space.

Effects on Wildlife. Commenters raised concerns about the impact of the helipad and helicopters on birds, including shorebirds and species in the Emeryville Bay Village tree canopy, and asked whether noise studies would be conducted. A commenter also requested that bird-safe glass fritting be placed on the exterior rather than the interior of the building.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Pedestrian, Bike, and Vehicle Access. Commenters raised concerns about cyclist and pedestrian safety on 53rd Street and asked that an alternative route, such as 45th Street, be made bike-safe. Additional concerns were raised regarding how construction from re-routing, noise and dust would impact the connection between the South Bayfront Bridge and San Pablo Avenue.
53rd Street Residents submitted written comments to the Parks and Recreation Committee which are attached to this staff report. (Attachment 6).

Staff Comments:

The proposal was reviewed at the May 28th Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting and other inter-departmental meetings between the Community Development Department and Public Works staff. Staff recognizes the value the proposed project could contribute to Emeryville by bringing new inpatient and emergency medical services to the community, providing expanded healthcare services, and producing skilled construction and high-paying medical jobs. Projects of this scale have regional benefits but also have local impacts on infrastructure, public services, fiscal sustainability, and long-term land use planning that must be addressed through the City’s entitlement process, environmental review, and any legally supportable project conditions, mitigation measures, and/or voluntary development agreement or community benefits.

Transportation Impacts. Staff recognized that a project of this size has the potential to substantially affect the City’s circulation system and multimodal transportation network. While removal of the recently built diverter may be necessary for the functioning of the hospital, the transportation analysis should evaluate the corresponding effects of removing this bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and, if significant impacts would occur, identify mitigation measures, to the extent feasible. Staff noted that the applicant has chosen not to identify specific bicycle and pedestrian improvements at this stage and is instead waiting for the transportation analysis to identify recommended measures.

Providing additional context at this stage will help all stakeholders, decisionmakers, and reviewing bodies understand how the transportation, safety, and multimodal concerns are expected to be addressed as the project moves through the entitlement, environmental review, and transportation analysis processes. Staff recommends that the applicant refine its project description so that it is more closely aligned with regional transportation planning and transportation impact analysis frameworks, including the Alameda CTC CMP Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, and show that the project’s future transportation analysis will evaluate:
• Bicycle and pedestrian barriers resulting from increased traffic volumes, turning movements, and circulation changes.
• Bicycle, pedestrian, transit, shuttle, and vehicle conflict locations and interactions.
• Potential effects on bicycle boulevard operations, bicycle network connectivity, and multimodal corridor function.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

• Specifically address the east/west 53rd Street Bike Boulevard and the North/South Horton Street Bike Boulevard and other Bike Boulevards near the project site.
• Transit operations, transit access, and interactions between proposed shuttle services and existing transit services.
• Discuss how or whether the shuttles may use existing stops citywide, shared with Emery Go-Round and AC Transit
• Driveway, loading, drop-off, shuttle, and emergency access interactions with the surrounding multimodal transportation network.
• Consistency with adopted City transportation policies and plans, including the Active Transportation Plan (ATP), Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), and General Plan transportation policies.

As several community members identified existing congestion and safety concerns on 53rd Street during school drop-off and pick-up, staff conducted a field survey on Wednesday, June 3rd. The survey findings are summarized in Attachment 7. The results of the survey are qualitative observations during drop-off and pick-up hours; and staff notes that the transportation analysis will address the ways in which the project may exacerbate this issue in greater depth.

Shuttle Routes and Shuttle Depot. As mentioned in Section III (c) of this staff report, the applicant has proposed a designated shuttle service to transport staff and patients/visitors between the Emeryville campus and Amtrak station, MacArthur BART station, West Oakland BART Station and off-site parking facilities. Sutter has not yet provided sufficient details on routes, frequency and volume of services to evaluate the efficacy of the shuttle.

This shuttle service is envisioned to facilitate smooth operation of the medical campus.

Further study should evaluate whether a robust shuttle program, including appropriate routes, frequency, hours of operation, stops, and coordination with existing transit services, would reduce not only trips directly to the campus, but also for the project’s vehicle trips, parking demand, VMT and multimodal conflicts. Staff encourages Sutter to explore potential integration of its shuttle service with the existing Emery-Go Round service, AC Transit, paratransit, and other existing services where doing so would improve project operations, reduce transportation impacts, or provide mutually beneficial transportation efficiencies.

Staff recommends that depot be designed to enhance, or at a minimum not diminish, the experience along the pedestrian and bike paths connecting from Horton Street to the South Bayfront Bridge. Doing so could support active transportation and reduce conflicts between shuttle operations and existing bicycle and pedestrian circulation. The applicant should also consider whether introducing a customer-facing, active commercial use (e.g. a café) facing the plaza could activate the pedestrian level use of this area.

Staff also recommends that the proposed curb-cut for the shuttle depot along Horton Street align with 53rd Street to avoid line-of-sight issues.

Housing Variant. For building site B1 (corner of Hollis Street and Stanford Avenue) the applicant has proposed two variants – one is a 3-story, 55,600 square foot medical office and the second variant is a 3-story residential building Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

accommodating 57 one-bedroom units for their employees. Both the environmental documents as well as the project approvals will review and consider the two options, to allow Sutter the flexibility to build workforce housing once the hospital is built and functioning. Staff understands that a larger medical office may not be feasible at this site given trip generation rates for such uses. However, staff encourages the applicant to consider a larger housing proposal for Sutter employees because it would potentially improve the project’s jobs/housing balance, reduce employee commute trips, and provide a more direct projectrelated benefit than additional medical office space at this location.

Community Benefits Program. As this is a part of an existing PUD, the City’s bonus density system does not apply. The EIR will identify the project’s potentially significant impacts and evaluate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives required under CEQA, including transportation, noise, air quality, aesthetics, and other applicable environmental topics. Separately, the City may evaluate broader fiscal, public service, and public health, safety and welfare issues associated with the proposed medical campus. For example, because the hospital would be operated by a nonprofit entity, the project may generate different fiscal effects on tax-dependent services such as police and fire than other forms of private development at this site. Staff is engaging a consultant to conduct a fiscal analysis to evaluate the medical campus’s fiscal and economic effects on the City.

To the extent supported by the fiscal analysis, environmental review, adopted City policies, or voluntary negotiations with Sutter, certain measures could be memorialized in a Development Agreement, Community Benefits Agreement, or similar mechanism. Potential topics may include, without limitation, transportation improvements, public realm improvements, senior programming, educational partnerships, workforce development, public art, or other project-related commitments. Any required conditions or exactions must be legally supportable or voluntary.

Miscellaneous (Public Art). Staff noted that there are tremendous opportunities for creating vibrant plazas with public art within the campus that would be of benefit to the community at large. Public art requirements may be considered through applicable City requirements, project design, or voluntary community benefit discussions, including opportunities to deploy art creatively on or beyond the campus where legally and practically appropriate.

Miscellaneous (Mobile Food Vendor). It was pointed out that Sutter has not proposed any new, ground floor retail/restaurant spaces that could benefit visitors and employees. Recognizing that the brick-and-mortar food spaces can often be less flexible and result in vacancies, Sutter could consider establishing a mobile food vendor program as these vendors are more flexible and can respond to demand. The use of mobile food vendors could also activate the existing Hollis Green park while providing food options for hospital users as well as the surrounding community members, including residents and office workers.

Providing dining options on site could also reduce the number of vehicle trips to and from the campus.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Miscellaneous (School and Child Care). Consistent with General Plan Policies PP14 through PP-P18, staff noted there are opportunities for Sutter to collaborate on programming with Emeryville Unified School District (EUSD) that would result in some form of educational programming such as intern and guest lecture programs.

Staff encourages Sutter to initiate the process of exploring such opportunities with the EUSD staff. This effort can also extend to education for seniors, as noted by comments made at the Commission of Aging meeting.

Consistent with General Plan Policies T-P-67 and PP-P-14, Community Services Department staff noted the potential increased demand for childcare associated with Sutter’s 2000+ employees that are expected to work at the Emeryville campus and the limited capacity at Emeryville Child Development Center. This demand may be even higher if the project ultimately incorporates the housing variant. Staff will continue to evaluate whether and how the project may affect demand for local childcare services.

Planning Commission Comments:

The Planning Commission reviewed the Sutter Medical Center proposal at their June 25, 2026 meeting. Approximately 18 people spoke during public comment, including two elected officials — an Oakland City Council member (District 1) Zach Unger and Emeryville City Council member Kalimah Priforce. The remaining speakers were residents (both Oakland and Emeryville) and community-group representatives (Doyle Street Co-Housing, Neighbors United, Golden Gate Community Association, the Emeryville Artist Cooperative/Co-op, Emery Bay Village, and the ETMA/ Emery GoRound).

The dominant themes of the public comments are summarized below:

Traffic and safety. Commenters expressed concerns with the approximately 20,000 additional daily trips that a 24-hour operation medical facility will bring to the existing street network. These concerns also included safety issues on 53rd Street and in the vicinity three nearby schools. Commenters also described existing issues of driveway-blocking and jaywalking during ECCL’s drop-off and pick-up times that could be exacerbated. A commentor noted that Stanford/San Pablo Avenue is a high collision corridor.

Oakland Engagement. A group of commentors asked why residents and the City of Oakland were not engaged, citing the traffic routes through Oakland streets.

Bicycle network. A strong attachment to the Horton Street bike boulevard and the regional greenway "hub" was expressed by several commentors and proposed removal of the diverter was viewed negatively.

Scale and height. Many commenters felt the project is too large for the site, and several commentors urged keeping the current (lower) height limit rather than amending the General Plan.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Shuttle Service. A representative of the ETMA urged coordination/consolidation of proposed shuttles with the Emery Go-Round; other commentors questioned the need for a private shuttle service when public transit (AC Transit, Emery GoRound) exists.

Other impacts. Commentors also expressed concerns with the proposed helicopter pad and resultant light/noise pollution; long construction duration (10+ years); associated potential toxics abatement; air quality near artist warehouses with skylights; and whether a state medical-planning process designates Emeryville as the right location for a hospital.

Commissioner questions and concerns are summarized below.

Horton Street traffic diverter. Multiple commissioners expressed concerns with the proposed removal of the diverter and saw it as breaking "a promise to the community." These commissioners generally stated that the City intentionally built traffic constraints, and this project both adds approximately 20,000 daily trips and removes an integral calming measure at the same time. Suggested alternatives included retractable bollards for emergency/shuttle access and right-turn-only restrictions on 53rd Street. It was noted that there was no bike infrastructure proposed to compensate for the removal of the diverter.

Shuttle coordination with the Emery Go-Round / ETMA. Several Commissioners emphasized the need for Sutter to coordinate with (or use) the existing public shuttle rather than run a duplicative private one.

Traffic and Regional Impacts. Commissioners acknowledged concerns expressed by residents regarding traffic, use of 53rd Street as an access route by project users, and that the applicant had not engaged or considered impacts on Oakland residents.

Community Process. Commissioners expressed disappointment that the applicants had not yet engaged with all stakeholder groups and wanted the applicant to conduct an active, coordinated outreach effort. The Commission requested this issue be addressed before returning for the second study session.

Housing at B1 Site. All commissioners pushed for a larger workforce housing proposal at the B1 site than the currently proposed 57 units.

Parking. A suggestion was made to explore creative ways of using existing parking facilities at the Bay Street garage, Grifols garage, and Grifols parking lot.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

Environmental Design Features. The applicant was asked to explore if any of the street trees could be saved. One Commissioner hoped that the proposed allelectric hospital would include a commitment to use renewable power. Other suggestions included adding solar canopies and green screens to the existing garage; improving the walking path from the facility to the Amtrak station; adding public open space; and exploration of the possibility of daylighting Temescal Creek.

Helipad/Noise and Light Pollution. The Commission expressed concerns over potential noise and light pollution and noted that no information was provided regarding flight paths.

Fiscal Analysis. The Commission supported completion of a fiscal analysis given Sutter’s non-profit status and consequent tax implications for the city.

Site Visit. An interest was expressed in conducting a Brown Act-compliant site visit to Sutter’s Van Ness/Geary facility.

Permits and Process:

Permits Required:

The project will require a PUD amendment and a General Plan Amendment to address the proposed height, and any other General Plan or PUD consistency issues identified through further review. The project may also require additional approvals or permits, including but not limited to Final Development Plan approval, design review, tree removal authorization, transportation demand management review, parking-related approvals, encroachment permits, utility relocation permits, sign approvals, and other City or outside agency approvals as applicable. The Planning Commission will make recommendation to the City Council for their final decision. If a Community Benefit Agreement or Development Agreement is proposed, this would also be evaluated as part of the entitlements package.

Prior to making a decision on the proposal, decision-makers will first need to certify the environmental document (EIR) prepared to ensure compliance with CEQA.

Process:

Following this study session, the project will continue through the City’s permit review process, including environmental review and public hearings, before any final entitlement decision is made. Additional project information and analysis may raise issues not yet identified in this report. These will be identified and addressed in the staff reports when the project is brought back to the Commission and Council for future study sessions, and for a hearing and decision.

Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CONNECTION
This study session is an early step in the entitlement process for Sutter Health, identified as one of the Council’s top four priorities in the Strategic Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the project’s entitlement process, including preparation of the EIR, is borne by the applicant. In connection with the City’s review of the application, the City has engaged a consultant to conduct a fiscal impact analysis of the proposed project.

STAFF COMMUNICATION WITH THE PUBLIC
As detailed elsewhere in this staff report, the project has been presented in several public meetings before committees and the Planning Commission. Staff also has responded directly to many phone calls and emails from the public, as is typical for a project of this size.

RECOMMENDATION AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER
After hearing a presentation from the applicant and receiving public testimony, staff recommends that the City Council provide comments and direction regarding this project, addressing the following issues, and any other issues, as appropriate:

1. Does the Council have any comments or direction regarding the project’s circulation plan and transportation improvements, including a. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements
b. Driveway/drop-off/loading/emergency access interactions with existing transportation infrastructure
c. The format, extent, frequency, and operating characteristics of the shuttle system
d. Whether the applicant should evaluate opportunities to coordinate the shuttle system with existing transit and community transportation services where doing so would reduce project impacts or improve transportation efficiency.

2. Has the Council identified any potential impacts from the proposed project on fiscal, public service, or public health, safety and welfare issues that would not be addressed through the CEQA mitigation process that should be further evaluated as part of the City’s entitlement review, fiscal analysis, or any community benefits discussions?

3. Does the Commission have any comments on the proposed scale of the housing variant proposed at the B-1 site, including whether the applicant should evaluate Sutter Hospital Medical Center Study Session
City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026

a larger workforce housing alternative or other site program that could reduce employee commute trips and better respond to project-related needs?

4. Does the Council have any input for the applicant on the design of the shuttle depot, including its relationship to Hollis Green, the South Bayfront Bridge connection, and adjacent bicycle and pedestrian facilities?

5. Does the Council have any other comments or direction regarding the project? PREPARED BY: Miroo Desai, Planning Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Sutter Hospital Medical Center Plans

2. Applicant Project Description

3. UPP Contract for CEQA Work

4. 53rd Street Residents Comments Submitted to BPAC

5. 53rd Street Resident Comments Submitted to Commission on Aging

6. 53rd Street Resident Comments Submitted to Parks and Recreation Committee

7. Staff Traffic Observation Summary (Anna Yates School)

8. Public Comments Received at the Planning Commission Study Session

SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Project Description - Plan Set
Jun 10, 2026
Submitted By: Sutter Health
Prepared By: SmithGroup
2 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Table of Contents
Context
Site Plan and Sections
Site Circulation
Development Graphics (Continued)
Development Graphics
1 2
3 4
4 Page Page
PDP Illustrative Plan at Full Buildout with Sutter-Acquired Properties Marked 4 Transit Routes at Project Site 5
Site Plan - Sutter-Owned Properties Existing Conditions 7 Site Plan - Proposed Emeryville Medical Center Project Site and Buildings 8 Existing Open Space / Landscape Plan 9
Conceptual Open Space / Landscape Plan 10
Conceptual Utility Plan 11
Conceptual On-Site Stormwater Management Plan 12
Conceptual Site Plan - Public Amenities on Ground Level 13 Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 1 14
Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 2/3 15
Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 8 16
Street Section - 53rd Street at Building 8 17
Street Section - Horton Street at Building 8 18
Street Section - Horton Street at Shuttle 19
Site Circulation - Proposed Bicycle Circulation 21
Site Circulation - Proposed Pedestrian Circulation 22
Site Circulation - Proposed Shuttle Circulation 23
Site Circulation - Proposed Public / Visitor / Employee Vehicular Circulation 24 Site Circulation - Proposed Ambulance Circulation 25
Site Circulation - Proposed Service Vehicles Circulation 26 Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Floor Plan 28
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Stacking Diagram 29
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (North) 30 Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (South) 31 Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (East) 32
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (West) 33
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Floor Plan 34 Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (North) 35 Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (South) 36 Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (East) 37 Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (West) 38

CONTEXT
01 4 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
PDP Illustrative Plan at Full Buildout with Sutter-Acquired Properties Marked Sutter-Owned Properties
Overall PDP Boundary*
Proposed PDP Buildings*
5 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Transit Routes at Project Site

SITE PLAN AND SECTIONS
02 7 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Plan - Sutter-Owned Properties Existing Conditions 8 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Plan - Proposed Emeryville Medical Center Project Site and Buildings

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING

LANDSCAPED PERIMETER FENCE

AROUND PROPERTY LINE
9 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Existing Open Space / Landscape Plan
10 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Conceptual Open Space / Landscape Plan

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING

LANDSCAPED PERIMETER FENCE

AROUND PROPERTY LINE
11 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Conceptual Utility Plan
12 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Conceptual On-Site Stormwater Management Plan
13 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Conceptual Site Plan - Public Amenities on Ground Level 9'-6" 20'-0" 17'-0"

EXISTING

SIDEWALK
CHIRON WAY / 2-LANE SIDEWALK

EXISTING

STORMWATER

PLANTING
5'-0"

PROPOSED
BUILDING 1

PROPERTY LINE
FENCE
7'-0" LANDSCAPE / PLANTING
STREET SECTION - CHIRON WAY AT BUILDING 1 14 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN
Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 1

EXISTING
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’

EXISTING STORMWATER PLANTING

PLANTING

GRIFOLS

BUILDING

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING

SIDEWALK
6'-2" 11'-0"
CHIRON WAY / 2-LANE
4'-0"

SIDEWALK PLANTING
20'-0" 8'-0" 11'-0"
STREET SECTION - CHIRON WAY AT BUILDING 2/3 15 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN
Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 2/3
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’

EXISTING
BUILDING 4

PROPOSED
BUILDING 8

SIDEWALK
10'-0"

PATIENT

LOADING
5'-0"

PATIENT

DROP-OFF
CHIRON WAY / 2-LANE SIDEWALK
9'-0" 24'-0" 8'-0"
STREET SECTION - CHIRON WAY AT BUILDING 8 16 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN
Street Section - Chiron Way at Building 8
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
Street Section - 53rd Street at Building 8

PATIENT SIDEWALK

LOADING

PATIENT

DROP-OFF
PROPOSED BUILDING 8

GRIFOLS

BUILDING

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING

SIDEWALK

EXISTING

SIDEWALK
6'-0"

EXISTING

BIKE LANE
(ELEVATED)

EXISTING

BIKE LANE
(ELEVATED)
7'-6" 26'-0" 7'-6"
53RD STREET / 2-LANE / 2-WAY
12'-0" 16'-0"

STORMWATER

PLANTING
13'-0"

INTERNAL

DRIVEWAY
9'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0"
FENCE
STREET SECTION - 53RD STREET AT BUILDING 8 17 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN

EXISTING
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’

GRIFOLS PARKING LOT

STORMWATER

PLANTING

PROPOSED
BUILDING 8

SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK

BIKE LANE
15'-0" 13'-0" 6'-0"
FENCE

PROPERTY LINE
24'-0" 6'-6"

EXISTING

BIKE LANE
6'-6"
HORTON STREET / 2-LANE / 2-WAY
STREET SECTION - HORTON STREET AT BUILDING 8 18 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN
Street Section - Horton Street at Building 8

EXISTING
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’
19 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER

KEY PLAN
Street Section - Horton Street at Shuttle

EXISTING
0’ 5’ 10’ 20’

LANDSCAPE / PLANTING

SHUTTLE BUS DROP-OFF CANOPY
(CONCEPTUAL LEVEL)

EXISTING

SIDEWALK

EXISTING

SIDEWALK FENCE

PROPERTY LINE

GRIFOLS

BUILDING
20'-0" 9'-0" 10'-0"

EXISTING
BIKE LANE / 2 WAY
(ELEVATED)

EXISTING

BIKE LANE
(ELEVATED)
HORTON STREET / 2-LANE / 2-WAY
22'-0" 7'-0" 8'-10"

STREET SECTION - HORTON STREET AT SHUTTLE BUS DROP-OFF

SITE CIRCULATION
03 21 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Bicycle Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING
22 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Pedestrian Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING
23 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Shuttle Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING
24 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Public / Visitor / Employee Vehicular Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING
25 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Ambulance Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING
26 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Site Circulation - Proposed Service Vehicles Circulation

FUEL TANKS &

GENERATORS
CANOPY + SEATS

BICYCLE

PARKING

DEVELOPMENT GRAPHICS
04 28 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Floor Plan
29 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Stacking Diagram
30 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (North)
31 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (South)
32 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (East)
33 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Hospital (Building 8) - Conceptual Elevation (West)
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Floor Plan 34 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (North) 35 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (South) 36 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (East) 37 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Medical Office Building (Building 1) - Conceptual Elevation (West) 38 Jun 10, 2026 SUTTER EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
1 Sutter Emeryville Medical Center
Project Description
Jun 8, 2026
Table of Contents
A. Overview. .............................................................................................................................3 B. Project History......................................................................................................................4 C. Emeryville Medical Center (EMC) Project Site....................................................................6 D. The Emeryville Medical Center (EMC) Project Design. ................................................... 10

1. Overview of EMC Project...................................................................................... 10

2. Building 1. ............................................................................................................. 13

3. Building 2/3. .......................................................................................................... 14

4. Building 4. ............................................................................................................. 14

5. Building 8. ............................................................................................................. 15

6. Helipad. ................................................................................................................. 16

7. PDU Building......................................................................................................... 18

8. Building 13/14 (Parking Garage). ......................................................................... 19

9. Open Space and Recreation Amenities. .............................................................. 20

10. Site Circulation...................................................................................................... 22 i. Removal of Traffic Divertor on 53rd Street / Horton Street....................... 22 ii. Bicycle Circulation..................................................................................... 26 iii. Pedestrian Circulation............................................................................... 29 iv. Shuttles Circulation and Off-Site Parking Facilities.................................. 30 v. Public / Visitor / Employee Vehicular Circulation ..................................... 32 vi. Ambulance Circulation.............................................................................. 33 vii. Service Vehicles Circulation ..................................................................... 35

11. Utilities................................................................................................................... 37 E. Environmentally Protective Enhancements...................................................................... 40 F. Estimated Construction Schedule. ................................................................................... 40 2 Figures
FIGURE 1: PDP ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN AT FULL BUILDOUT WITH SUTTER-ACQUIRED

PROPERTIES MARKED
FIGURE 2: SUTTER-OWNED PROPERTIES EXISTING CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3: PROPOSED EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER PROJECT SITE AND BUILDINGS FIGURE 4: TRANSIT ROUTES AT PROJECT SITE
FIGURE 5: CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE / LANDSCAPE PLAN
FIGURE 6: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION
– EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM (WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC DIVERTER) FIGURE 7: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION
– EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM (WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC DIVERTER) FIGURE 8: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION
– EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM (TRAFFIC DIVERTER REMOVED)
FIGURE 9: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION
– EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM (TRAFFIC DIVERTER REMOVED)
FIGURE 10: PROPOSED BICYCLE CIRCULATION
FIGURE 11: PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
FIGURE 12: PROPOSED SHUTTLE CIRCULATION
FIGURE 13: PROPOSED PUBLIC / VISITOR / EMPLOYEE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION FIGURE 14: PROPOSED AMBULANCE CIRCULATION
FIGURE 15: PROPOSED SERVICE VEHICLES CIRCULATION
FIGURE 16: CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN
FIGURE 17: CONCEPTUAL ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 A. Overview.

The Emeryville Medical Center (EMC) Project is part of the Emery Yards (aka Emeryville Center of Innovation) campus purchased by Sutter Bay Hospitals, dba Alta Bates Summit Medical Center and Sutter Bay Medical Foundation, dba Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation (collectively, “Sutter”) from affiliates of Biomed Realty (“BMR”), which is a portion of what was formerly called the Chiron Development Plan campus. The original Chiron Development Plan site is located west of Hollis Street, south of Stanford Avenue, north of 45th street and east of the railroad tracks.

The City approved a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) for the Chiron campus in 1995.

Sutter acquired the portions of the PDP site that were owned by BMR in February 2025. Sutter proposes amendments to the PDP and two previously approved Final Development Plans (FDPs) for the development of a new hospital facility and associated helipad (Building 8); conversion of two existing research and development/office buildings (Buildings 2/3 and 4) into medical office and ambulatory care facilities and the construction of a new ambulatory care building (Building 1). The hospital would comprise a single building on a parcel previously approved for two office/research and development buildings (Buildings 8A and 8B) that have not been constructed. The PDP and FDP amendments would permit the proposed uses and include site plan revisions reflecting the design of the two proposed new buildings. 4 B. Project History.

The City approved the PDP for the Chiron campus in 1995. The PDP project was studied in the Chiron Development Plan Project EIR. Both the PDP and the EIR contemplate development of a maximum amount of square footage subject to certain design concepts. Though neither the PDP nor the EIR restricted the exact location, square footage or configuration of any building or use, both documents include illustrative diagrams demonstrating how the project might have been built out at various stages. The illustrative plan for full buildout of the PDP campus that appears in both the PDP and the EIR is shown in Figure 1 below, with the properties later acquired by Sutter marked with red dashed lines.

FIGURE 1: PDP ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN AT FULL BUILDOUT

WITH SUTTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTIES MARKED
The PDP identified then-existing buildings by letters and identifies the new buildings in its illustrative layouts by numbers. The PDP contemplated demolition of most then-existing buildings, and construction of Buildings 1 through 14, plus associated parking facilities. The PDP proposed to retain three buildings that were existing in 1995: (1) Building D, (2) the Process Development Unit (PDU) building, and (3) the Commercial Manufacturing Facility (CMF) building. Total development, including both existing and new construction but excluding parking structures, was proposed at 2,200,000 square feet. This buildout represented a proposed net increase of 1,588,000 square feet over the 612,000 square feet that existed in 1995.
1 The PDP allowed the developer the option either to turn Horton Street into a private access drive and replace it with a new Horton Bypass that would have extended outside the western boundary of the PDP site along the railroad tracks (see Figure 1), or to maintain Horton Street as a public street and extend it to connect with Stanford Avenue. The developer elected to proceed with the latter option and extended Horton Street to connect to Stanford Avenue. The 1 1995 Chiron Draft EIR, Table II.2, p. II.15. All square footage numbers are stated in terms of “usable space,” which excludes parking structures.
5 segment of Horton extending from 53rd street to Stanford Avenue has since been improved with bicycle lanes that are separated from the vehicle travel lanes by bollards.

Since approval of the PDP, Building 4, a laboratory building, was built at Hollis and 53rd Street pursuant to an FDP approved on August 20, 1996. A parking structure, Building 12A, was built on Horton Street near Stanford Avenue. A central utility plant was constructed as Building 7A on Chiron Way. Hollis Green Park , and Building 5 is no longer proposed to be built.2 FDPs were approved by the City Council in February 2002 for Building 3, a research and development building north of Building 4, and for Building 7B, an expansion of Building 7A. However, neither of these buildings were constructed. Most recently, on February 25, 2021, the Planning Commission approved an FDP (by Resolution FDP19-002) for the construction of Buildings 1, 2/3, 8A, 8B, and 13/14, and the demolition of Building 7A and two other existing buildings. The City’s Community Development Director administratively modified the conditions of approval to the 2021 FDP on June 9, 2023.

In 2006, the multinational Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis acquired Chiron. In November 2013, the diagnostics unit of Novartis was sold to Grifols, a multinational pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturer. The sites of diagnostic facilities were accordingly transferred to Grifols.

As a result, the sites of Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7A, 8, 13, 14 and the PDU were retained by Novartis, while the sites of Buildings 6, 7B, 9, 10, 11, 12A, 12B the CMU and Building D were acquired by Grifols. BMR acquired all of the Novartis properties in March 2019, and Sutter acquired them in February 2025. The remainder of the PDP site continues to be owned by Grifols. The Sutter-owned properties are marked with red dashed lines in Figure 1 above; the unmarked properties belong to Grifols. Building 7A has since been demolished.

Grifols declined to assume obligations under the Chiron Development Agreement, allowing the Development Agreement to lapse on the Grifols-owned properties. Although Sutter assumed the obligations and rights under the Development Agreement, it expired on September 13, 2025. 2 The PDP contemplated development of Building 5, which extends outside the PDP site to the “PG&E Tank Farm site.” The PDP states on page 2-1: “The PG&E Tank Farm site is not part of the PUD Area but may be developed with the Life Sciences Center Project if Chiron is able to acquire the PG&E Tank Farm.” BMR and subsequently Sutter did not acquire the PG&E Tank Farm site, and according to the Project Description for the 2020 FDP, Novartis did not indicate to BMR that it or Chiron had ever acquired that site.
6 C. Emeryville Medical Center (EMC) Project Site.

The EMC Project site comprises approximately 12 acres of the 22-acre PDP site. The EMC Project site includes the sites of buildings depicted in the PDP illustrative plan as proposed Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 13, and 14, the PDU Building, and Hollis Green Park. All of the above currently exist, except for Buildings 1 and 8. Buildings 2 and 3 have been constructed as one single building (Building 2/3), as have Buildings 13 and 14 (Building 13/14).

Sutter Bay Hospitals owns the site previously proposed for Buildings 8A and 8B (now proposed as Building 8 for the hospital), and Sutter Bay Medical Foundation owns the sites of Buildings 1, 2/3, 4, and 13/14, and the PDU Building.

The current condition of all the Sutter-owned properties is shown in Figure 2, while the proposed plan is shown in Figure 3 below.

FIGURE 2: SUTTER-OWNED PROPERTIES EXISTING CONDITIONS
7 FIGURE 3: PROPOSED EMERYVILLE MEDICAL CENTER PROJECT SITE AND BUILDINGS As shown in Figure 2, within the EMC Project site, the existing Sutter-Owned properties include Building 2/3, Building 4, Building 13/14, the PDU Building and Hollis Green Park.

Building Site 1 in the northeastern portion of the PDP site (at the southwest corner of Stanford Avenue and Hollis Street) is currently developed with surface parking that serves the existing Buildings 2/3 and 4. This area is surrounded by Building 2/3 to the south, Grocery Outlet corporate offices and surface parking across Hollis Street to the east, a sports bar and small office building across Stanford Avenue to the north, and the existing Building F within the PDP site immediately to the west of Chiron Way.

Building Sites 2 and 3 are located directly north of Building Site 4. Building Sites 2, 3, and 4 are currently developed with existing Buildings 2/3 (approximately 261,300 square feet) and 4 (approximately 292,500 square feet). This area is surrounded by Hollis Green Park and PG&E warehouse the south, Grocery Outlet corporate offices and surface parking across Hollis Street to the east, and the sites of the existing Building F and proposed Building 8 within the PDP site immediately to the west of Chiron Way.

Building Site 8, where the new hospital is proposed, is currently fenced and surrounded by Grifols properties to the north, west and south. This area is surrounded entirely by existing buildings within the PDP site: Building N to the south, Building H to the west, existing Building CMF and F to the north, and existing Building 4 to the east. 8 Building Sites 13 and 14, in the southwestern portion of the PDP site, are currently developed with Building 13/14, a structured parking garage. Immediately north of Building Sites 13 and 14 is the planned location for the City’s Horton Landing Park connecting to the South Bayfront Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge. To the east across Horton Street are existing Grifols buildings. To the west and south of the 13/14 site, is the Sherwin-Williams Mixed Use Project.

The square footages of existing buildings are estimated as follows:

Owner and Building Square Footage
Sutter – 2/3 Approximately 261,300.

Sutter – 4 Approximately 292,500.

Sutter – 13/14 Parking Garage & an approximately 1,200 café Sutter – PDU Approximately 20,700
Grifols – CMF 85,000 estimated.

Grifols – D 15,000 estimated.

Grifols – F 27,400 according to the 2021 FDP Submission Grifols – H, E, N, Q and R 157,300 according to the 2021 FDP Submission Grifols - 12A Parking Garage
9 The project site is within a Transit Priority Area. It is located within 0.5 miles of the Emeryville Amtrak station, which is considered a major transit stop, and San Pablo Avenue, which is considered a high-quality transit corridor because it is served by AC transit bus routes (72, 72M) that have service intervals of 15 minutes. The Emeryville Amtrak rail station provides access to the Capitol Corridor rail line that connects Sacramento in the north to San Jose in the south.

Transit service to local destinations is provided by AC Transit and Emery Go Round bus services via bus stops located adjacent to the site along Hollis Street and Stanford Avenue. The Emery Go Round bus currently provides service with 15-minute headways at the Hollis Street and 53rd Street bus stop.

FIGURE 4: TRANSIT ROUTES AT PROJECT SITE
10 D. The Emeryville Medical Center (EMC) Project Design.

1. Overview of EMC Project.

The EMC Project proposes one new approximately 785,000 square feet hospital building (Building 8) and one new approximately 55,600 square feet (excluding parking) ambulatory care building (Building 1).

The EMC Project would also include tenant improvements to convert existing Buildings 2/3 and 4 to medical office and ambulatory care facilities. The existing Building 13/14 parking garage would support all buildings within the EMC Project - new Buildings 1 and 8 and the existing Buildings 2/3 and 4.

Building 1 would complete the build-out of the Hollis Street frontage between 53rd Street and Stanford Avenue. The proposed design for this street frontage would incorporate a view and access corridor between existing Building 2/3 and proposed Building 1. The opening between buildings would allow public access and views to the courtyard/open space that would be created along Chiron Way. Building 8 would complete the interior of the EMC Project site.

Building 13/14 would continue to operate as a garage that accommodates 1,991 vehicles as well as long-term and short-term bicycle parking, a café and a bicycle repair kiosk. Including grade and roof levels, the garage has 5 levels on the western side facing the Sherwin-Williams Mixed Use Project, stepping up to 11 levels on its eastern side facing Horton Street.

The approximate gross square footage and number of floors in each of the buildings on the EMC Project site after buildout of the EMC Project is shown in the following table. The two new buildings (B1 & B8) to be constructed as part of the EMC Project are in bold text and shaded:

Emeryville Medical Center
Square Footage of Buildings at Buildout
B1 B2/3 B4 B8 B13/14
Total
(Approx.)
55,600
(w/o parking) 270,700 292,500 785,000 1,200
Estimated Total for Buildings B1, B2/3, B4, B8 and B13/14: 1,405,000 square feet The PDP is proposed to be amended to allow the proposed hospital and ambulatory care/medical office uses and would also continue to allow administrative office uses. Some space would be used for loading docks, utility space and pedestrian links and connections within the buildings. Retail uses provided on the ground floor include the 1,200 square feet of existing publicly accessible cafe at the parking garage (Building 13/14), directly in front of Horton Plaza. There would be no retail spaces on the ground floor for the hospital (Building 8), but it would have approximately 500 square feet of gift shop and approximately 2,000 square feet of dining space on Level 02. There would be no retail space within Building 1, Building 2/3 and Building 4.
11 The total gross square footage proposed for the EMC Project site after buildout of the EMC Project would be approximately 1,405,000 gross square feet.

The net new population projected for the EMC Project is anticipated to be approximately 429 net new physicians, 2,981 net new employees and 12,060 net new patients and visitors for the Medical Office Buildings (MOBs) and the hospital compared to today. These estimates assume

0.5 visitors per patient for the MOBs and 1 visitor per bed for the hospital.

The square footage of all buildings in the EMC Project site would not cause the PDP site to exceed the 3.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) under the General Plan or the 2.33 FAR, in accordance with PDP Section 2.4.2. Upon buildout of the EMC Project, the entire PDP site, including the Grifols properties, would have approximately 1,689,700 gross square feet. After buildout of the EMC Project, the Sutter-owned properties would have approximately 1,405,000 square feet, compared to the 1,370,000 square feet depicted on these properties in the PDP’s illustrative plan.

The following sections provide more detail on each component of the EMC Project. 12 2. Building 1.

Building 1 would consist of a 3 story, approximately 55,600 square feet Medical Office Building with a total building height of 50 feet tall (excluding rooftop penthouse structures). The ground floor would have an enclosed lobby area, with elevators up to the medical office, 53 parking spaces and other ancillary spaces. 44 parking spaces would be for patient use, while 9 accessible parking spaces specifically provided for the Ambulatory Surgery Center located within the adjacent Building 2/3. Levels 2 and 3 would accommodate ambulatory care and the building roof areas would be used for mechanical equipment and elevator penthouses. Building 1 is anticipated to have 25 physicians, 97 full time daily employees and a daily patient/visitor population of 1,088 people. The building would operate from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Mondays through Fridays, from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM on Saturdays, and would remain closed on Sundays. Please see the Plan Set for all figures and plans indicating Building 1 as a future Medical Office Building.

Alternatively, the site could also be developed for residential use. Under this housing variant, it could accommodate a 50 feet tall (excluding rooftop penthouse structures) residential building for employees, totaling approximately 55,600 gross square feet. The ground floor would have an enclosed lobby area, with elevators up to the residences, 52 parking spaces and other ancillary spaces. 43 parking spaces would be for residents, while 9 accessible parking spaces would be specifically catered for the Ambulatory Surgery Center located at the adjacent Building 2/3. This housing variant would provide 57 units, all of which would be designed as one-bedroom apartments. Please see Exhibit A for all figures and plans indicating Building 1 as a future residential building.

During the interim period prior to construction of Building 1, the site would be utilized as a construction staging and coordination area, storing temporary construction trailers and construction materials and equipment. During this period, the 9 accessible parking spaces to serve the Ambulatory Surgery Center located at the adjacent Building 2/3 would be installed. 13 3. Building 2/3.

Sitting on a 2.9-acre fully landscaped parcel, the existing 7-story (plus penthouse) empty shell building is approximately 270,700 gross square feet and was initially designed to accommodate future research and development laboratories and associated support space. The Hollis Street Medical Office Building (MOB) project scope would include interior build-out to convert the existing building to a MOB and Ambulatory Surgical Center. In addition to a fully finished/mostly glazed façade, the existing building is equipped with a finished entrance lobby/café area. The building is also served with a 3-bay loading dock and Back of House (BOH) support, 4 public elevators, 2 service elevators, 2 exit stairs, mechanical shafts, Electrical/TR rooms, and a mechanical penthouse. The main entrance lobby to the building is being relocated from Hollis Street (East) to Chiron Way (West). Entry would occur though a pedestrian plaza which would include a vehicular drop off from Chiron Way.

The MOB would include Urgent care, imaging, blood draw/specimen collection lab and a retail pharmacy on the entrance level. Urgent care would have separate/dedicated access from the exterior. There would be an Ambulatory Surgery center, Sterile processing services, a patientoriented conference center, a non-oncology infusion center and associated pharmacy. The MOB would also house an array of specialty clinics including women’s clinic, OB/GYN, Prenatal, Pediatrics, Urology, Neuroscience, ENT & Surgery clinics.

The MOB is anticipated to have 107 physicians, 489 full time daily employees and a daily patient/visitor population of 4,655 people. The MOB would operate from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Mondays through Fridays, from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM on Saturdays, and would remain closed on Sundays.

4. Building 4.

Building 4 is an existing 7-story, approximately 292,500 square feet building originally designed to accommodate research and development laboratories. The EMC Project would include interior tenant improvements to convert Building 4 to accommodate ambulatory care and associated support space on all levels.

Building 4 is anticipated to have 134 physicians, 509 full time daily employees and a daily patient/visitor population of 5,829 people. The building would operate from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Mondays through Fridays, from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM on Saturdays, and would remain closed on Sundays.
14 5. Building 8.

Building 8, the new hospital facility, is planned as a 15-story building with an additional mechanical level and helipad, totaling approximately 785,000 square feet and a height of 330 feet. The hospital would include up to 325 beds, labor and delivery, a neonatal intensive care unit, postpartum, medical-surgical, an intensive care unit, emergency room, and operating rooms.

The Emeryville hospital would operate 24 hours every day in 3 shifts – 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM, 3:00 PM to 11:30 PM and 11:00 PM to 07:30 AM. Based on the existing operation of the Alta Bates Hospital in Berkeley, it is anticipated that approximately 45% of employees and physicians will work from 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM, 35% from 3:00 PM to 11:30 PM and 20% from 11:00 PM to 07:30 AM.

There will be an estimated total of 2,049 personnel, which includes 163 physicians and 1,886 full time employees to support continuous 24/7 operations. The total number of daily personnel on site is expected to be approximately 1,464 (2,049/1.4), including 116 physicians and 1,348 employees, reflecting a 5-day work schedule (7 days ÷ 5 days). This would result in approximately 52 physicians and 606 employees during the peak shift from 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM, 41 physicians and 472 employees from 3:00 PM to 11:30 PM and 23 physicians and 270 employees from 11:00 PM to 7:30 AM.

Building 8 is anticipated to have patient/visitor population of 488. 15 6. Helipad.

The EMC Project would include a helipad located on the roof level of the hospital, designed to support medical operations. It would accommodate one helicopter up to the size of a Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk. Currently Air Medical Operators utilize a variety of single and light twin helicopters in Northern California. These include the Bell 407, Eurocopter H125, H130, H135, and H145 platforms. Sutter anticipates that all or nearly all flights will be performed by these aircraft. Public Operators regionally utilize other, sometimes larger helicopters (Medium Duty Twin) that are not frequently employed for medical transportation but are included in major disaster plans. These include the Eurocopter MH-65 (US Coast Guard) and several variants of Sikorsky UH-60 (US Military, CalFire, US Coast Guard). While the helipad would be engineered to support these larger helicopter models to ensure flexibility, the intended day‑to‑day use is for smaller medical helicopters typically deployed for hospital transport.

It is anticipated to accommodate approximately one flight per day, primarily serving patient transport. The estimate of one helipad trip per day was developed using a conservative analysis of expected patient transfers based on regional sending hospitals, distance, traffic conditions, and clinical need. The team reviewed historical transfer patterns and applied professional judgment from experience with similar hospitals.

For planning purposes, we developed assumptions of helicopter usage based on historical patterns, geographic distance, clinical acuity and time sensitivity and traffic conditions. More distant hospitals were assumed to rely on air transport more frequently, hospitals at a moderate distance to use a helicopter roughly half of the time, while close hospitals were assumed to use ground transport.

These assumptions were intentionally conservative and benchmarked against other Sutter Health hospitals. It is noted that there is significant variation in hospital helipad usage due to hospital capability & mission profile (trauma centers have a significantly higher usage) and geography (higher usage at tertiary/quaternary hospitals that serve more rural areas). Both data sets suggest that usage could be lower, but planning for one trip per day allows for growth in volume over time. More information from other Sutter hospitals is provided on the next page. 16 Hospital Total Bed
Size
Landings
(Annual) Comments
Eden 130 52
This is a level II trauma center and interventional stroke center, and in similar geographic area as Alta Bates Medical Center and Emeryville.

Mills Peninsula
Medical Center 301 110
This is a tertiary regional hospital with a high-level
interventional stroke program and interventional cardiac and cardiac surgery program.

Solano 106 30 This is a community hospital with mostly outbound transportation needs for patients.

Santa Rosa 124 298
This is a regional tertiary hospital with interventional cardiac and NICU services, but is in a very different geographic area with much more extensive helicopter transport from rural Sonoma, Mendocino, Lake and Humboldt counties. The
hospital also receives a number of "scene" transports (directly from the 911 call scene) due to its cardiac services and geographic location). Even though this is still below the conservative 1 transport per day estimate, we would not anticipate this volume in Emeryville.

Sacramento 523 550
This is a large, quaternary adult and children's hospital with extensive specialty programs for adult, pediatric and neonatal patients populations in Northern California, particularly for the rural communities to the North and East. We do not
anticipate that volumes would be similar for Emeryville.

Roseville 418 354
This is a busy level II trauma center and otherwise tertiary regional hospital with several specialty programs. 93% of the helicopter landings at this facility are attached to "scene" calls where a helicopter transports directly from a 911 call and, for this facility, and largely associated with trauma and cardiac diagnosis from the largely rural areas to the north and east of this hospital. We would not anticipate the same factors in Emeryville.

Amador 52 32 This is a small, rural community hospital with almost exclusively outbound needs.
17 7. PDU Building.

The PDU Building is a vacant existing 20,700 square feet building and is proposed to be demolished. See Section 10 – Site Circulation (Shuttles Circulation and Off-Site Parking Facilities) for proposed use.

During the interim construction period after demolition, but prior to installation of the proposed new shuttle pick-up and drop-off location described in Section 10, the PDU Building site would be utilized as a construction staging and coordination area, storing temporary construction trailers and construction materials and equipment.
18 8. Building 13/14 (Parking Garage).

Building 13/14 is a dedicated parking structure accommodating vehicle and bicycle parking, a café of approximately 1,200 square feet and a bicycle repair kiosk. Access to the building is provided from two driveways on Horton Street. Spaces that allow electric vehicle charging are provided in amounts required by California Building Code (59 EV stalls), and the building is solar-ready. The building height is stepped back from the adjacent Sherwin-Williams Mixed Use Project. The east side that faces Sherwin-Williams is four stories plus roof-top parking (5 levels of parking) and is set back 37 feet from the adjacent Sherwin-Williams building. The west side that faces Horton Street is 10 stories plus roof-top parking (11 levels of parking). The 10-story portion of the garage is set back 81 feet from the closest Sherwin-Williams building.

The north end of the garage accommodates an amenity space that is planned to house a café or similar food service business. A bicycle repair kiosk would be located in the parking structure.

The parking garage provides 1,991 spaces, which serves the entire EMC Project.

There are no proposed changes to Building 13/14.
19 9. Open Space and Recreation Amenities.

The PDP’s revised conceptual plan for open space includes a network of grade‑level, semi‑public landscaped areas along building frontages, complemented by privately owned, publicly accessible open spaces such as Stanford Plaza, Chiron Plaza, Horton Plaza, Hollis Green Park and a pedestrian Paseo. With the addition of two new buildings (Building 1 and Building 8) and the demolition of the PDU building, the open space design would be refined to enhance user experience. The proposed design would introduce a publicly accessible, at‑grade landscaped circulation system connecting the buildings, with a strong emphasis on pedestrian‑oriented design. This system would integrate planting areas, water‑treatment features, drop‑off zones, and building access points.

FIGURE 5: CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE / LANDSCAPE PLAN
As shown in Figure 5 above, the new Stanford Plaza would occupy the northeastern corner of the PDP site, on a portion of the proposed Building 1 lot at the intersection of Stanford Avenue and Hollis Street. The proposed Building 1 and existing Building 2/3 (5555 Hollis) would be separated by Chiron Plaza, which would also include a drop‑off area serving the converted MOB at 5555 Hollis Street. The paseo along the southern edge of 5555 Hollis would continue to provide a pedestrian friendly corridor from the existing Building 4 (5300 Chiron Way).

Building 13/14 is a parking garage that includes Horton Plaza, an at-grade level patio area.

Horton Plaza is immediately adjacent to Horton Landing Park and directly connected to the South Bayfront Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge. These plazas provide outdoor seating, pedestrian pathways, and gathering spaces, and remain available for public use. 20 The hospital (Building 8) would incorporate landscaping elements, bioretention planters and establish a pedestrian connection linking the parking garage (Building 13/14) to 5300 Chiron Way (Building 4), 5555 Hollis (Building 2/3), and the future Building 1.

Development of the hospital would require removal of approximately 16 existing public trees within the Building 8 site, due to site constraints, including limited available area, necessary driveway access and a building footprint that is maximized to accommodate the required program on Level 1.

To offset this impact, new trees would be planted at the proposed shuttle stop area adjacent to Horton Plaza. The additional trees would provide shade for pedestrians and enhance the experience of the visual corridor coming off the South Bayfront Pedestrian Bicycle Bridge.

Construction of the new plazas would be phased to align with the development of the building adjacent to each open space. Sutter would also continue to operate and maintain the current 30,000-square-foot Hollis Green Park in accordance with the existing conditions of approval and the Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded July 6, 2007. The park’s entry gates would remain open to the public from 8:00 a.m. until sunset.

The ultimate goal is for these privately owned, publicly accessible open courtyards and pathways to function as part of a broader open space network that would guide pedestrians and bicyclists from residential areas north and east of the PDP site to the South Bayfront Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge, Bay Street and the waterfront pathways. This network would help advance the vision outlined in the City of Emeryville General Plan, particularly Chapter 4 – Parks, Open Space and Public Services. Collectively, the open spaces distributed throughout the campus would enhance the connectivity, livability and overall comfort for the campus users and the broader community.
21 10. Site Circulation.
i. Removal of Traffic Diverter on 53rd Street / Horton Street The proposed project is anticipated to generate over 20,000 daily trips, including approximately 1,500 trips during the peak hour. A traffic diverter currently located on the north side of the 53rd Street/Horton Street intersection restricts through movements along Horton Street and prohibits westbound right turns from 53rd Street to northbound Horton Street. As a result, all vehicular access to and from the Horton Street garage is funneled via 53rd Street, that would constrain circulation for the proposed hospital and medical office buildings (MOBs) and contribute to congestion on Hollis Street, Powell Street, and 40th Street.

Initial Purpose of the Existing Traffic Diverter for Prior Development Project The traffic diverter was installed pursuant to a development agreement with BioMed Realty for the Emery Yards project. It functions to limit vehicle traffic on the Horton Street Bicycle Boulevard. Horton Street is designated as a Bicycle Boulevard between 53rd Street and 40th Street in the City’s Active Transportation Plan.

To address increased traffic volumes along Horton Street, particularly between the new office buildings and the Horton Street parking garage, separated bikeways were constructed on both sides of 53rd Street between Horton Street and Hollis Street, as well as on both sides of Horton Street between 53rd Street and 45th Street. These improvements were implemented by BioMed Realty to reduce effects on bicycle travel along the corridor.

South of 45th Street, Horton Street continues to operate as a bicycle boulevard. Vehicles exiting the Horton Street parking garage are currently restricted to left turns only, helping maintain low traffic volumes and preserve bicycle boulevard operations south of 45th Street.

How the Existing Traffic Diverter affects Proposed Development Under existing plus project conditions, with the traffic diverter, preliminary traffic simulation analysis shows significant queuing during the AM peak hour on Horton Street, 53rd Street, Hollis Street, Powell Street, and 40th Street for vehicles accessing the garage (see Figure 6).

During the PM peak hour, all exiting vehicles would be required to turn left onto Horton Street (due to the current driveway configuration and right-turn restrictions), followed by a right turn onto 53rd Street, and then a left or right turn onto Hollis Street to exit the campus. Additionally, the proposed reduction of westbound 40th Street from two lanes to one as part of the 40th Street multimodal improvements, which would require increased green time for westbound traffic, is expected to result in extended queues on southbound Hollis Street. These queues could extend back to Powell Street and spill onto adjacent side streets, potentially creating gridlock conditions (see Figure 7).

Proposal to Remove Traffic Diverter – Improved Circulation and Potential Impacts To improve site access and circulation, the project proposes removing the existing traffic diverter at the 53rd Street/Horton Street intersection. Traffic signal modifications would be implemented to accommodate through vehicle movements, as well as pedestrian and bicycle crossings. Additional modifications at the Horton Street garage would allow vehicles to turn right onto southbound Horton Street, improving access to 40th Street. The analysis indicates that removing the diverter and allowing right turns from the garage would significantly enhance traffic 22 operations, resulting in shorter queues and improved overall circulation, as shown in Figures 8 and 9. However, allowing vehicles exiting the parking garage to turn right onto southbound Horton Street would also increase traffic volumes along Horton Street and adversely affect its function as a bicycle boulevard.

The traffic signal modifications and multimodal improvements associated with the removal of the traffic diverter at the 53rd Street/Horton Street intersection, and the improvements needed to reduce effects on bicycle travel along the Horton Street Corridor, would be coordinated with the City through the project development review and approval process.

Measures to Reduce Potential Impacts
To reduce potential conflicts among bicyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles near the hospital driveways on 53rd Street and the shuttle access driveway on Horton Street, the project will incorporate design features that prioritize pedestrian and bicycle movements, along with signage and pavement markings to alert all users to potential conflict areas.

Shuttle Access Driveway/Horton Street - To reduce effects on traffic operations at the 53rd/Horton Street intersection, the shuttle access driveway would be restricted to right-turns only.

Stanford/Horton Intersection - The project will implement pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements focusing on increasing visibility, reducing vehicle speeds, and reducing conflict points, such as through protected intersection design elements (corner islands), colored pavement markings (green paint), setback crossings, and raised crossings in coordination with the city.

Stanford/Chiron Way/Peladeau Street - The project will implement an all-way stop control at this intersection to address inadequate sight distance issues for traffic on Peladeau Street. In addition, the project will implement pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements focusing on increasing visibility, reducing vehicle speeds, and reducing conflict points, such as through protected intersection design elements (corner islands), colored pavement markings (green paint), setback crossings, and raised crossings in coordination with the city. 23 FIGURE 6: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM (WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC DIVERTER)
24 FIGURE 7: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM (WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC DIVERTER)
25 FIGURE 8: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM (TRAFFIC DIVERTER REMOVED)
26 FIGURE 9: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONGESTION – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM (TRAFFIC DIVERTER REMOVED)
27 ii. Bicycle Circulation
FIGURE 10: PROPOSED BICYCLE CIRCULATION
Bicycle facilities in the project vicinity include shared-use paths, bicycle lanes, buffered bicycle lanes, bicycle routes, bicycle boulevards, and separated bikeways. The City of Emeryville recently completed separated bikeways (located at sidewalk level) on Horton Street between 45th and 53rd Streets and on 53rd Street between Horton and Hollis Streets. The Horton Street bikeway provides a connection for cyclists traveling to the Emeryville Amtrak Station.

Bicyclists traveling along Horton Street between 45th Street and Stanford Avenue would continue to be separated from vehicular traffic by the raised cycle track (at sidewalk level) between 45th Street and 53rd Street and the protected cycle track between 53rd Street and Stanford Avenue. The protected cycle track between 53rd Street and Stanford Avenue remain at street level and is separated from vehicular traffic by bollards.

In addition, the project would provide bicycle parking within the site. Long-term and short-term bicycle parking are provided at the existing parking garage (Building 13/14) and 5555 Hollis (Building 2/3) and would also be included at the proposed shuttle stop as well as at Building 1, with sufficient bicycle parking spaces to meet CALGreen requirements and will also comply with the City’s bicycle parking requirements (Section 9-4.408). 28 Bicycle Network Connections and Alternative Routes
The EMC Project Site also connects to Horton Landing Greenway, a multi-use path developed by the City as part of its South Bayfront Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge and Horton Landing Park project. These paths provide connections to the pedestrian bridge and Bay Street to the west.

They will also offer access to the EMC Project site and other Emeryville neighborhoods to the east. The paths link Emeryville Greenway and the Amtrak station to the north, and the Bay Trail to the south.

The path runs in a north-south direction, parallel to and west of Horton Street along the railway tracks, connecting Sherwin Avenue and Stanford Avenue and providing a route without conflicts with vehicular traffic. This alternative bicycle and pedestrian route will give users another way to travel without using Horton Street. Bicyclists may access these City paths from Horton Street and Horton Plaza.

Measures to Reduce Potential Impacts to Bicycle Travel
With the development of the project, curb cuts would be required on the west side of Horton Street, south of 53rd Street, to provide shuttle access. In addition, two curb cuts would be added on the north side of 53rd Street to accommodate inbound and outbound access to the hospital drop-off area. The project will coordinate with the City to evaluate potential improvements to the existing protected bike lanes on Horton Street between 53rd Street and Stanford Avenue to reduce effects on bicycle travel.

To also minimize potential conflicts between bicyclists and vehicles near the hospital driveways on 53rd Street and the shuttle access driveway on Horton Street, the project shall consider the following measures in coordination with the City:
• To emphasize pedestrian and bicycle priority, the sidewalk and separated bikeway shall be maintained as raised facilities across both driveway crossings, requiring vehicles to ramp up when crossing.
• The bikeways shall include high-visibility green pavement markings through the full width of each driveway crossing, to delineate the conflict zone. • Driveway design shall minimize curb radii and crossing width to the maximum extent feasible, to reduce vehicle speeds.
• Sight distance at each driveway shall be maximized through the establishment of clear sight triangles, with restrictions on landscaping, and signage. • Enhanced signage and pavement markings shall be installed, including “Yield to Bicycles” signage for exiting vehicles and advance warning signage for both motorists and bicyclists.
29 iii. Pedestrian Circulation
FIGURE 11: PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
Sidewalks and crosswalks are provided along all roadway segments in the project area except on the west side of Chiron Way, from south of the Grifols building to 53rd Street. The project would construct a new sidewalk along the hospital frontage on the west side of Chiron Way, extending from 53rd Street to the current sidewalk terminus just north of the proposed hospital site. The project would also install a midblock crossing on Chiron Way to facilitate pedestrian crossings between the hospital and the MOBs. Pedestrian signal heads and push buttons are installed at nearby signalized intersections, while high-visibility or standard crosswalks are present at nearby unsignalized intersections. Continuous pedestrian facilities would connect the site with surrounding land uses, including nearby restaurants and transit stops. The project would also provide continuous pedestrian connections between the on-site shuttle plaza, the Horton Street parking garage, the hospital, and the medical office buildings. 30 iv. Shuttles Circulation and Off-Site Parking Facilities FIGURE 12: PROPOSED SHUTTLE CIRCULATION
To promote transit use, the project would operate a dedicated shuttle service to transport staff and patients/visitors between the Emeryville Medical Campus and the Emeryville Amtrak Station, MacArthur BART Station, West Oakland BART Station and off-site parking facilities.

The shuttle service would be available for use by the public and would begin running once the Tenant Improvement work for the Medical Offices are completed. Shuttle loading and unloading will only occur in the new Shuttle Stop at the PDU Site.

The removal of the PDU building allows for a new shuttle pick-up and drop-off location. The project would need to operate approximately 11 shuttles (with 20 passenger capacity) during employee peak hours to transport employees between Berkeley satellite parking lot, the Oakland satellite parking lot and the campus. During employee peak hours between 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM and between 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM, there would be a frequency of 1 shuttle every 5 minutes. During off-peak hours, the frequency of shuttles would potentially be 1 shuttle every 20 minutes.

The project would require additional shuttles with a larger passenger capacity to transport employees and visitors to and from the Emeryville Amtrak Station, MacArthur BART Station, West Oakland BART Station and the campus. Potentially, there will be a frequency of 1 shuttle every 15 minutes during both peak and off-peak hours, to the Amtrak Station and the 2 BART stations.
31 The anticipated shuttle frequencies may be adjusted as needed to accommodate actual demand. The shuttles to the off-site parking facilities would operate after the full buildout of the campus. However, the BART and Amtrak shuttles may need to operate before that to encourage 5555 Hollis MOB employees to use alternative transportation modes even if there is no parking deficit.

The demolition of the PDU building and construction of the new shuttle stop provides an opportunity to enhance the arrival experience for pedestrians coming off the pedestrian bridge.

A perimeter fence required for security purposes could be designed as a decorative greenwall or landscaped fence, providing a soft separation between the park and the shuttle stop.

The project would also provide off-site parking facilities for employees and operate a dedicated shuttle service to transport staff between the off-site parking locations and the EMC campus.

These off-site parking facilities would potentially be located at Berkeley Alta Bates to the north of the project site and the Oakland Summit Campus to the south of the project site. These shuttle services would be mainly used for bringing employees from the off-site parking facility to the campus. This satellite parking would not be needed until the hospital is operational. Refer to the parking analysis and trip generation memo for additional information. 32 v. Public / Visitor / Employee Vehicular Circulation FIGURE 13: PROPOSED PUBLIC / VISITOR / EMPLOYEE CIRCULATION The proposed EMC Project has public, visitor and employee vehicular circulation limited to the city street network along Hollis, Stanford, 53rd and Horton Streets, and circulation within the campus along Chiron Way. Designated passenger pick-up and drop-off locations mentioned in the TDM Plan are shown on Figure 13 above.
33 vi. Ambulance Circulation
FIGURE 14: PROPOSED AMBULANCE CIRCULATION
The proposed Hospital is a specialized hospital providing labor and delivery services, neonatal care, and related inpatient and outpatient services. As such, emergency medical transport activity is expected to be less intensive than a full general acute‑care trauma hospital.

Ambulances would access the hospital via Stanford Avenue and Hollis Street, then through Chiron Way as shown in Figure 14 above. Emergency access and routing would be coordinated with Alameda County EMS, local fire departments, and law enforcement to ensure safe and efficient response based on real‑time traffic conditions and emergency protocols. Ambulance trips would occur on an as‑needed basis and are expected to be intermittent throughout the day and night rather than on a fixed schedule.

Ambulances serving the hospital would not park on public streets. Ambulances are operated by third‑party EMS providers and would use designated on‑site emergency vehicle loading areas for short‑term staging or patient transfers. The facility would not maintain a dedicated ambulance fleet, and the number of ambulances serving the hospital at any time would be determined by regional EMS dispatch protocols and patient needs. Based on current operations at Alta Bates Berkeley Hospital, the proposed Emeryville hospital is anticipated to receive approximately 20 to 30 ambulance arrivals per day. Ambulance operations would also comply with all applicable California Vehicle Code and local noise regulations. Sirens would be used only when necessary for public safety and would not be used continuously upon arrival or departure.
34 vii. Service Vehicles Circulation
FIGURE 15: PROPOSED SERVICE VEHICLES CIRCULATION
Service vehicles would only access the site through Stanford Ave to Chiron Way or Horton Street as shown in Figure 15 above. The plan is for these service vehicles to operate and complete major deliveries before the early-morning peak hour traffic, and limited deliveries would occur during the day.
35 The truck delivery data was analyzed for the Alta Bates Ashby Hospital to as reference for estimated frequency and times of deliveries for the new Emeryville hospital.

VENDOR FREQUENCY DAY/TIMES TRUCK SIZE
Supplements Weekly Varies Box Truck
Vending Bi-Monthly Varies Box Truck
Specialty Meats Weekly M Box Truck
DISTRIBUTION ABSMC:

Patient Meals Daily
Herrick Meal Deliveries:

Times: 0725, 0900,
1215, 1545
Box Truck
Seafood Weekly Varies Box Truck
Linen Weekly Th Box Truck
PEPSI Weekly F Half-Semi
REYES COCA COLA Bi-Weekly W, F Half-Semi
Uniforms Weekly Th Box Truck

THE AMERICAN
BOTTLING CO Bi-Monthly Th Box Truck
Bakery Weekly M Box Truck
Broadliner Weekly M, W, F Half-Semi
Produce and Grab & Go Weekly M, Tu, W, Th, F Box Truck
Specialty Snacks Monthly Varies UPS
Office Supplies Bi-Monthly Varies Box Truck
McKesson - Pharmacy Daily Times: 0730, 1400 Box Truck
Medline Daily 0700, 1700 53’ Semi, Box
Truck
Fisher Scientific 3x a week Varies FedEx / UPS
O2 Bi-Monthly Varies 53’ Semi
Fuel Tank Monthly Varies 53’ Semi
FedEx and UPS Daily Varies FedEx / UPS
(Bi-Monthly = 2 times a month, Bi-Weekly = 2 times a week) 36 11. Utilities.

New utility services would be constructed to serve the proposed hospital building. Existing public infrastructure for water, storm drain, and sewer mains are available within the 53rd Street and Horton Street frontages adjacent to the hospital building parcel.

New domestic and fire water services are planned off of either the existing 12-inch main in Chiron Way or the existing 10-inch main in Horton Street, or a combination of both. All new water service applications would be processed through the utility owner, EBMUD, with oversight by the City.

Existing storm drain infrastructure surrounding the Hospital parcel includes an existing 13.5ft by 15ft underground concrete culvert within 53rd Street, an 18-inch storm main within Horton Street, and a 12” storm main within running east to west on the north side of the Hospital Parcel. The Culvert within 53rd is owned by the Alameda County Flood Control District while the 18-inch within Horton Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Emeryville. The on-site storm drain is private and owned and maintained by Sutter Health. Two existing 18-inch storm drain laterals were constructed as part of the BioMed Realty public backbone infrastructure improvements to serve this development site. This eliminates the need to obtain new connection permits with the County by utilizing these existing services. The private 12-inch storm pipe located on-site within the northern portion of the hospital parcel is also available for on-site storm water discharge.

Additional connections to this pipe can be permitted under site utility permit. A capacity analysis will be performed later to determine if new public storm drain infrastructure is anticipated to be needed in order to service the proposed development. Stormwater quality will be managed onsite with LID treatment facilities programmed and designed to meet State and Local water quality requirements. To facilitate access to the hospital from Chiron, several existing LID flow through planters currently treating the Chiron pavement will be reprogrammed within the hospital site, in addition to the new facilities required to manage the hospital parcels storm water runoff.

A new sewer service lateral for the hospital building is planned for the west side of the parcel and would connect to the existing 12-inch main within Horton Street. In addition, site sewer would connect to the existing private 10-inch pipe that flows west, parallel with the parcel’s northern property line. This existing onsite sewer discharges to the existing 12-inch main within Horton Street. A capacity analysis will be performed later to determine if additional public regional sewer infrastructure is anticipated to be required in order to serve the project.

The project would not propose to extend the recycled water main location to the project site.

Given the project’s medical campus use, recycled water would be limited to landscape irrigation. 37 FIGURE 16: CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN
38 FIGURE 17: CONCEPTUAL ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 39 E. Environmentally Protective Enhancements.

In addition to implementing the relevant mitigation measures required by conditions of approval of the PDP, the EMC Project would comply with current laws regarding environmentally protective measures. It would implement the current recommendations of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to protect nesting birds and roosting bats by conducting preconstruction surveys and comply with the City’s Bird Safe Buildings regulations (Muni. Code §§ 9-4.801 to 9-4.804). The EMC Project includes compliance with the City’s Urban Forestry Ordinance (Muni. Code §§ 7-10.01 to 7-10.12). The project would implement the energy and water efficiency requirements of current building, energy and landscaping codes, including Cal Green requirements.

The hospital would be designed to meet Title 24 energy code standards and would operate as an all‑electric facility. The design would reduce energy demand through the implementation of high‑performance building strategies, including advanced mechanical and electrical systems, LED lighting with daylight and occupancy controls, and integrated energy‑management technologies. The proposed new Building 8 hospital and Building 1 would utilize all-electric services. Existing Building 2/3 and Building 4 would continue to utilize the same power sources with which they were originally constructed.

F. Estimated Construction Schedule.

Site preparation and construction activities would be coordinated based on the timing of required approvals.

Building 2/3 at 5555 Hollis Street is expected to begin tenant improvement work approximately within 2 months after entitlement approval, with an anticipated construction duration of approximately 21 months. The earliest estimated schedule for the construction phase is Q3 2027 – Q4 2029.

For Building 8, Final Development Plan (FDP) will be submitted towards the end of entitlement process. It is expected to follow a longer construction schedule of about 71 months, and it is anticipated to have some overlap with the construction schedule for Building 2/3. The earliest estimated schedule for the construction phase is Q1 2028 – Q4 2033.

Building 4 at 5300 Chiron Way is planned to proceed with tenant improvements as future program requires. Administrative uses currently occupy a portion of the building. There would be no tenant improvement work done at Building 4 until post occupancy of the hospital. The earliest estimated schedule for the construction phase is Q3 2034 – Q4 2035.

The future Building 1 is estimated to start construction after the hospital is in operation, with an approximately 24 months construction phase. The earliest that construction for Building 1 would begin would be after full occupancy of Building 2/3 (5555 Hollis), Building 4 (5300 Chiron) and Building 8 (Hospital). In the interim, the site would be used as a construction coordination area.

C A L I F O R N I A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT

F O R C I T Y U S E O N L Y
Contract No. CIP No.

Resolution No. Project No.

REV01/ 2025
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT (“Contract”) is effective as of the “Effective Date”), by and between THE CITY OF
EMERYVILLE, a municipal corporation, (“City”) and URBAN PLANNING PARTNERS, INC (“Contractor”), individually referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

WITNESSETH THAT
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Contractorfor preparing environmental documents in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Sutter Hospital project (PUD25-001); and
WHEREAS, the City finds that specialized knowledge, skills, and training are necessary to render the services necessary to do the work contemplated under this Contract; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Contractor is qualified by training and experience to render such services; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor desires to provide such services; and, WHEREAS, the public interest will be served by this Contract; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND TERMINATION DATE

1.1 Project Description
A complete project description is set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

1.2 Services
The services to be completed under this Contract (“Services”) are described in the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A. The Services shall be performed in accordance with terms, conditions, and specifications set forth herein. To the extent there is a conflict between the Scope of Work, and the terms, conditions, and specifications set forth herein, the terms, conditions, and specifications set forth herein shall govern.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 CEQA25-1
25017E-0000-CD01
25-60
N/A
07/21/2025
Docusign Envelope ID: D6FD65FB- FF23-4F1B-A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

1.3 Schedule and Completion Date
The Services to be provided by Contractor under this Contract shall commence on the Effective Date and terminate on DECEMBER 31, 2027. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Contract.

2. WORK CHANGES

2.1 City Rights to Change
The City reserves the right to order changes in the Services to be performed under this Contract by altering, adding to or deducting from the Scope of Work. All such changes shall be incorporated in amendments executed by the Contractor and the City. Such amendments shall specify the changes ordered and any necessary adjustment of compensation and completion time.

2.2 Additional Work Changes
Any work added to the Scope of Work by an amendment shall be executed under all the applicable conditions of this Contract. No claim for additional compensation or extension of time shall be recognized unless contained in an amendment duly executed on behalf of the City and the Contractor.

2.3 City Manager Execution
The City Manager has authority to execute without further action of the Emeryville City Council, any number of amendments so long as their total effect does not materially alter the terms of this Contract or increase the total amount to be paid under this Contract, as set forth in Section 3.2 below.

3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

3.1 Compensation for Services Performed
City agrees to pay the Contractor for the Services performed and costs incurred by Contractor upon certification by the City that the Services were actually performed and costs actually incurred in accordance with the Contract. Compensation for Services performed and reimbursement for costs incurred shall be paid to the Contractor upon receipt and approval by the City of invoices setting forth in detail the Services performed and costs incurred. The City shall pay the Contractor within forty-five (45) days after approval of the invoice by City staff.

3.2 Total Compensation Amount
The total amount paid under this Contract as compensation for Services performed and reimbursement for costs incurred shall not, in any case, exceed TWO MILLION FOUR

HUNDRED TWENTY ONE THOUSAND AND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY TWO DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($2,421,422.00), except as outlined in Section 2.3 above.

The compensation for Services performed shall be as set forth in Exhibit A.

Reimbursement for costs incurred shall be limited as follows. Long distance telephone Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

and telecommunications, facsimile transmission, normal postage and express mail charges, photocopying and microcomputer time shall be at cost. Supplies and outside services, transportation, lodging, meals and authorized subcontracts shall be at cost plus no more than a 10% administrative burden. Automobile mileage shall be no more than the current deductible rate set by the Internal Revenue Service.

4. COVENANTS OF CONTRACTOR

4.1 Assignment of Contract
The Contractor covenants and agrees not to assign or transfer any interest in, nor delegate any duties of this Contract, without the prior express written consent of the City. As to any approved subcontractors, the Contractor shall be solely responsible for reimbursing them and the City shall have no obligation to them.

4.2 Responsibility of Contractor and Indemnification of City To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City’s members, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature and description, damages, injury (including without limitation injury to or death of an employee of Contractor or subcontractors as well as any claim by any employee, agent, Contractor or independent contractor hired or employed by Contractor that such persons or individuals are entitled to any benefit otherwise provided to employees of the City, including coverage under the California Public Employee Retirement System), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert contractors or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and the costs of investigation, arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone that they control. This indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for Contractor. This obligation to indemnify and defend the City, its members, officers, agents, employees and volunteers shall survive termination of this Contract.

If Contractor’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Contractor’s performance of “design professional” services (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor, and, upon Contractor obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Contractor’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault.

Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

4.3 Independent Contractor
The Contractor hereby covenants and declares that it is engaged in an independent business and agrees to perform the Services as an independent contractor and not as the agent or employee of the City. The Contractor agrees to be solely responsible for its own matters relating to the time and place the Services are performed; the instrumentalities, tools, supplies and/or materials necessary to complete the Services; hiring of contractors, agents or employees to complete the Services; and the payment of employees, including compliance with Social Security, withholding and all other regulations governing such matters. The Contractor agrees to be solely responsible for its own acts and those of its subordinates and employees during the term of this Contract.

4.4 Insurance
Contractor shall not commence Services under this Contract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under Exhibit B. Failure to provide and maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the City to terminate this Contract for cause.

4.5 Records, Reports and Audits

4.5.1 Records
A. Records shall be established and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with requirements prescribed by the City with respect to all matters covered by this Contract. Except as otherwise authorized, such records shall be maintained for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made under this Contract. Furthermore, records that are the subject of audit findings shall be retained for three years or until such audit findings have been resolved, whichever is later.

B. All costs shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, or vouchers, or other official documentation evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. All checks, payrolls, invoices, contracts, vouchers, orders or other accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part to this Contract shall be clearly identified and readily accessible.

4.5.2 Reports and Information
Upon request, the Contractor shall furnish to the City any and all statements, records, reports, data and information related to matters covered by this Contract in the form requested by the City.

Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

4.5.3 Audits and Inspections
At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City for examination all records with respect to all matters covered by this Contract. The Contractor will permit the City to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to audit all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and or data relating to all matters covered by this Contract.

4.6 Conflicts of Interest
The Contractor covenants and declares that, other than this Contract, it has no holdings or interests within the City of Emeryville, nor business holdings, contracts or agreements with any official, employee or other representative of the City. For the duration of this Contract, in the event the Contractor or its principals, agents or employees acquire such a holding, interest, contract, or agreement within the City of Emeryville or with any official, employee or representative of the City in the future, the Contractor will immediately notify the City of such holding, interest, contract, or agreement in writing.

4.7 Confidentiality
The Contractor agrees that such reports, information, opinions or conclusions shall not be made available to or discussed with any individual or organization, including the news media, without prior written approval of the City. The Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City information whether deemed confidential or not.

4.8 Discrimination Prohibited
The Contractor covenants and agrees that in performing the Services required under this Contract, the Contractor shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, national origin or ancestry, age or disability, except as provided in section 12940 of the Government Code.

4.9 Licenses, Certifications and Permits
The Contractor covenants and declares that it has obtained all diplomas, certificates, licenses, permits or the like required of the Contractor by any and all national, state, regional, county, city or local boards, agencies, commissions, committees or other regulatory bodies in order to perform the Services contracted for under this Contract.

All work performed by Contractor under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily expected of competent professionals.

4.10 Key Personnel
All of the individuals listed in Exhibit A are necessary for the successful prosecution of the Services due to their unique expertise and depth and breadth of experience. There shall be no change in Contractor’s Project Manager or members of the project team Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

without the City’s approval. Contractor recognizes that the composition of this team was instrumental in the City’s decision to award the work to Contractor and that compelling reasons for substituting these individuals must be demonstrated for the City’s consent to be granted. Any substitutes shall be persons of comparable or superior expertise and experience. Failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall constitute a material breach of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract and shall be grounds for termination.

4.11 Authority to Contract
The Contractor covenants and declares that it has obtained all necessary approvals of its board of directors, stockholders, general partners, limited partners or similar authorities to simultaneously execute and bind Contractor to the terms of this Contract, if applicable.

4.12 Ownership of Work
All reports, designs, drawings, plans, specifications, schedules, work product and other materials prepared or in the process of being prepared for the Services to be performed by the Contractor (“Materials”) shall be and are the property of the City and the City shall be entitled to full access and copies of all such Materials. Any such Materials remaining in the hands of the Contractor or subcontractor upon completion or termination of the work shall be delivered immediately to the City. The Contractor assumes all risk of loss, damage or destruction of or to such Materials. If any Materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment.

4.13 City Labor Requirements

4.13.1 Compliance
At the Effective Date, compliance with the City’s living wage ordinance is ;; required / not required for this Contract. If this Contract provides for compensation to Contractor of $25,000 or more within a single fiscal year for providing Services to the City, then Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Living Wage Ordinance set forth in Chapter 31 of Title 5 of the Emeryville Municipal Code, unless (i) Contractor is a governmental entity, (ii) this Contract is subject to a higher prevailing wage rate as defined in the California Labor Code, or (iii) this Contract is subject to federal or state laws or regulations that would preclude the application of the City’s laws.

4.13.2 Applicability
Compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance, if applicable, shall be required during the term of the Contract for all employees of Contractor who perform at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the work arising from this Contract, unless said employees are otherwise exempt from the application of the Living Wage Ordinance pursuant to Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

Section 5-31.08 of the Emeryville Municipal Code. Contractor shall promptly provide to the City documents and information verifying compliance with the requirements of the Living Wage Ordinance within ten (10) working days following a written request for such documentation and information from the City.

4.13.3 Non-Compliance
Failure to comply with the Living Wage Ordinance provides that a person claiming a violation thereof may bring an action against Contractor for back pay, reinstatement and compensatory damages, as well as a penalty up to three times the amount of damages for a willful violation, plus reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In addition, the City may terminate the Contract and pursue any other remedies available to the City, including debarment, for violations of the Living Wage Ordinance.

4.13.4 Living Wage
Contractor shall notify each of its affected employees with regards to wages that are required to be paid pursuant to this Contract. “Living Wage” means no less than

18.54 PER HOUR (which is subject to increase annually on July 1st to reflect the twelve-month average increase to the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Metropolitan Statistical Area for the preceding year from May to April, not to exceed three percent (3%) in any one year) including wages and health benefits. If employer contributions for health benefits are not paid on an hourly basis, the employer must demonstrate to the City the hourly value of such benefits in order to receive credit for such payments to covered employees.

4.13.5 Minimum Wage and Paid Sick Leave
In addition to the Living Wage Ordinance, the Contractor may be required to comply with the City’s Minimum Wage, Paid Sick Leave, and Other Employment Standards Ordinance, as set forth in Chapter 37 of Title 5 of the Emeryville Municipal Code , to the extent it is applicable.

4.14 California Labor Requirements

4.14.1 Prevailing Wage Requirements
Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects Prevailing Wage Laws”). If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Contractor and all subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1).

The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4.

4.14.2 Registration
If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Contractor and all subcontractors performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall maintain registration for the duration of the Contract and require the same of any subcontractors, as applicable.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.

4.14.3 Labor Compliance Oversight
This Contract may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor that affect Contractor’s performance of Services, including any delay, shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Contractor caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor.

4.14.4 Workers’ Compensation
Pursuant to the requirements of section 1860 of the California Labor Code, Contractor will be required to secure the payment of workers’ compensation to his employees in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the Labor Code. By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies the following:

I am aware of the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

4.14.5 Event of Default
Failure by Contractor to comply with any provision of this Section shall constitute a default of this Contract and shall be grounds for termination as provided in this Contract.

5. TERMINATION
A. The City shall have the right to terminate this Contract for any reason whatsoever by providing written notice thereof at least five (5) calendar days in advance of the termination date.

B. All termination notice periods triggered pursuant to written notice shall begin to run from the date of the United States Postal Service postmark.

C. Upon termination, City shall provide for payment to the Contractor for Services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination date.

D. Upon receipt of a termination notice the Contractor shall: (1) promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice directs otherwise; and (2) promptly deliver to the City all data, drawings, reports, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been generated or used by the Contractor in performing this Contract, whether completed or in process, in the form specified by the City.

E. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, this Contract is subject to immediate termination in the event the City Council does not appropriate sufficient funds for this Contract.

F. The rights and remedies of the City and the Contractor provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided under this Contract or at law or in equity.

6. NO PERSONAL LIABILITY
No member, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor or any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Contract.

7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Contract constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties and supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. No other agreement, statement or promise relating to the subject matter of this Contract not contained in this Contract shall be valid or binding. This Contract may be modified or amended only by a written document signed by representatives of both Parties with appropriate authorization.

Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

8. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Subject to the provisions of this Contract regarding assignment, this Contract shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective Parties.

9. APPLICABLE LAW AND ATTORNEY’S FEES; VENUE
If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Contract, the rules, regulations, statutes and laws of the State of California will control.

The prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which said party may be entitled. The exclusive venue for any legal action taken pursuant to this Contract shall be the State of California Superior Court for the County of Alameda or the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

10. SEVERABILITY
The caption or headnote on articles or sections of this Contract are intended for convenience and reference purposes only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent thereof, or of this Contract nor in any way affect this Contract. Should any article(s) or section(s), or any part thereof, later be deemed unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Contract shall remain in full force and effect to the extent possible.

11. BUSINESS TAX CERTIFICATE
Prior to commencement of the Services to be provided hereunder, Contractor shall apply to the City of Emeryville Finance Department for a business tax certificate, pay the applicable business tax and maintain said business tax certificate during the term of this Contract, as provided in Article 1 of Chapter 1 of Title 3 of the Emeryville Municipal Code.

12. NOTICES

12.1 Communications Relating to Daily Activities
All communications relating to the day-to-day activities of the work and invoices shall be exchanged between Miroo Desai for the City and Carla Violet for the Contractor:

CITY CONTRACTOR
Miroo Desai, Planning Manager
Phone No: 510-596-3785
E-Mail : [email protected]
Carla Violet, Associate Principal
Phone No: 510-251-8210 ext. 1005
E-Mail : [email protected]
Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

12.2 Official Notices
All other notices, writings or correspondence as required by this Contract shall be directed to the City and the Contractor, respectively, as follows:

CITY CONTRACTOR
Chadrick Smalley, CDD Director
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, California 94608
Phone No: 510-596-4355
E-Mail : [email protected]
with a copy to:

Miroo Desai, Planning Manager
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, California 94608
Phone No: 510-596-3785
E-Mail : mdesai@emeryville. org
Lynette Dias, Principal
388 17th Street, Suite 230
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone No: 510-206-4456
E-Mail : [email protected]

13. COUNTERPARTS
This Contract may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. It is expressly agreed that each Party to this Contract shall be bound by its own telecopied, scanned, electronic or digital signature and shall accept the telecopied, scanned, electronic or digital signature of the other Party to this Contract.

14. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES
Except to the extent expressly provided for herein, there are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

15. NON-EXCLUSIVITY
City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with the Services covered under this Contract.

16. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER
Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Contract or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City.

Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

17. WAIVER
The City’s failure to enforce any provision of this Contract or the waiver in a particular instance shall not be construed as a general waiver of any future breach or default.

18. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Compliance with terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C is required / not required for this Contract. Contractor shall also fully and adequately comply with the provisions included in Exhibit C (“Other Requirements”) when attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Other Requirements”). With respect to any conflict between such Other Requirements and the terms of this Contract and/or the provisions of state law, Exhibit C shall control.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 City of Emeryville | Professional Services Contract
REV01/ 2025

19. SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and the Contractor have executed this Contract, which shall become effective as of the date first written above.

Approved As To Form:

City Attorney
Dated: CITY OF EMERYVILLE
LaTanya Bellow, City Manager
Dated: URBAN PLANNING PARTNERS, INC
Signature)
Lynette Dias, Principal
Attach:

W-9 Form
Attach:

Business License Certificate
Docusign 852265641BF0Docusign Envelope Envelope ID: ID: 6B3940F4- D6FD65FB-D26A- FF23-47C0- 4F1B-B787- A6D6- 52EC48049D12 07/21/2025

P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

SUTTER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Submitted to:

Miroo Desai, Planning Manager
City of Emeryville
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, CA 94608
May 23, 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0

P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

SUTTER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Submitted to:

Miroo Desai, Planning Manager
City of Emeryville
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, CA 94608
May 23, 2025
Prepared by:

Urban Planning Partners, Inc.
388 17th Street, Suite 230
Oakland, CA 94612
510.251.8210
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 i

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

1. INTRODUCTION & PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ..................................................................... 1 Figure 1: Project Area Aerial Photo ........................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Parcel Map ................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 3: Zoning Map ................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 4: Land Use Map ............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 5: Images from the Project Area ..................................................................................... 3 Figure 6: Draft Site Plan ........................................................................................................... 4

2. APPROACH & SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................. 7 Table 1 Work Program Summary .......................................................................................... 8 Figure 7 Study Intersection Location ..................................................................................... 13

3. TIMELINE ................................................................................................................................ 33 Table 2 Proposed Timeline ................................................................................................... 33

4. ESTIMATED FEE ..................................................................................................................... 35 Table 3 Preliminary Fee Estimate ......................................................................................... 37 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R ii
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 1 1 . I N T R O D U C T I O N & P R O J E C T U N D E R S TA N D I N G Urban Planning Partners, Inc. (Urban Planning Partners) is pleased tosubmit this proposal tothe City of Emeryville toprovide Environmental Review Services for the Sutter Health Medical Center Project project). We are excited toassist the City and Sutter Health inpreparing a comprehensive CEQA document. This section describes our understanding oftheproject and introduces our team. Our recommended scopeof work is detailed in Section2. The project timeline, andestimated feefor preparing an EIR and associated documents are provided in Sections 3 and 4, respectively.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Our understanding oftheproject, detailed below, is based on discussions with and information received from the City of Emeryville.

PROJECT LOCATION
The project siteis located withinthe City of Emeryville andfalls withintheboundaries oftheformer 24.1- acre Chiron Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) area. Itis generally bounded by Stanford Avenue tothe north, Hollis Street totheeast, the Amtrak railway tracks tothe west, and existing buildings tothe south.

The proposed project focuses on the Sutter Health portion ofthe PDP area, which includes six parcels totaling approximately 12 acres, as shown in Figure 2: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs). 1 The larger PDP areacurrently contains tenexisting buildings, four of whichare ownedby Sutter Health.

Existing uses across thesite include a pharmaceutical company (Grifols), a parking garage, office buildings, and a park.

Most ofthe PDP area is zoned PUD-3 with a small portion ofthesite categorized as Park/Open Space PO) as shown in Figure 3. The General Plan’s Land Use Diagram considers most ofthe PDP area as Office/Technology with a small portion ofthe site as Park/Open Space (see Figure 4). Most ofthe site is also located within one-half mile ofthe Emeryville Amtrak Station.

The project site is ina mixed-use area that has alight industrial character with large blocks and building footprints. Selected views ofthesiteare included in Figure5. There area mix of heights onandaround thesite area, ranging from one toten stories tall. Surrounding land uses include offices, apartments, a dog park, commercial space, furniture stores, warehouses and light manufacturing, restaurants and bars, parking lots, and public utility. Though not directly adjacent, one block east ofthesite are residential neighborhoods composed of predominantly single-family homes. Across thetraintracks tothe west of thesite is Bay Street, a primary retail center in Emeryville. 1 49-1558- 5, 49-1558- 6, 49-1558- 4, 49-1558- 2, 49-1544- 2, 49-1544- 1-4 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 2 FIGURE 1: PROJECT AREA AERIAL PHOTO
Source: ESRI
FIGURE 2: PARCEL MAP
Source: Alameda County Assessor’ s Office
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 3 FIGURE 3: ZONING MAP
Source: City of Emeryville
FIGURE 4: LAND USE MAP
Source: City of Emeryville
Grifols Building Existing Building at 53rd and Hollis Street Parking Garage on Horton Street FIGURE 5: IMAGES FROM THE PROJECT AREA
Source: Google Maps

PROPOSED PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
The proposed project includes the development and reuse of multiple sites, as illustrated in Figure 6:

1. New Hospital (Building 8):
o Construction of anew hospital onavacant site, withupto225 beds. o Proposed at approximately 500,000 building gross square feet (BGSF) andaheight of 225 feet (excluding penthouses).

2. New Building (Building 1):
o Construction of anew buildingonavacant site withtwopotential landuse options:

1. Medical Office Building (MOB), proposed at 310,000 BGSF and200 feettall excluding a mechanical penthouse), or
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 4 2. Residential Apartments, proposed at 300,000 BGSF and200feettall (excluding a mechanical penthouse).

3. Adaptive Reuse of Existing Buildings:
o Conversion oftwovacant office/laboratory buildings locatedat 5555 Hollis Street (B2/3) and5300 Chiron Way (B4), totaling approximately 588,000squarefeet, to medical office and/or outpatient ambulatory uses.
o Conversion ofthe PDU building, totaling approximately 13,776 square feet, to medical office uses.

4. Parking:
o Use ofthe recently completed parking garage (approximately 2,000 spaces) located west of Horton Street, south of 53rd Street, as theprimary parking facility for the project.

The total new development would add between 800,000 and 810,000 BGSF. A General Plan Amendment will be required toincrease the height limit from thecurrent 50/100 feet to75/100+ feet toaccommodate the proposed buildings. The project also proposes a helipad.

FIGURE 6: DRAFT SITE PLAN
The total daily population on the proposed Sutter campus is anticipated tobe approximately 15,000 people with approximately 4,400 employees/ physicians, 6,500 patients and approximately 4,100 visitors.

Peak hour calculations will be clarified by a transportation consultant, but the anticipated morning peak Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 5 hour population is estimated at approximately 2,900people and anafternoon peak hour populationis estimated at approximately 3,200 people.

PROJECT TEAM SUMMARY
Urban Planning Partners is a land use policy and environmental planning firm located in Oakland. We are 100-percent woman-owned.

Urban Planning Partners has extensive experience
preparing CEQA documents for large reuse and mixed-use
developments onurban infill sites that involve a plethora of complexities. We also have significant experience
working withthe City of Emeryville on many oftheir
development projects over the past 20+ years. In
managing the CEQA process for the Sutter Health Medical Center project, Urban Planning Partners will draw upon current and past experience addressing thefull range ofissues associated with urban infill development and medical facilities, including consistency withplanning policy, landuse compatibility, transportation, and noise.

As the lead consultant, Urban Planning Partners will manage the contract, be responsible for the accuracy and quality of all work products and analyses and represent the team at all public hearings. We have assembled thefollowing well-qualified team toprepare the EIR:

Urban Planning Partners, Inc.: project management; preparation of all documents and notices; project description; and CEQA analysis related to aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, biological resources, land use, plans and policies, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities, and alternatives.

Baseline Environmental Consulting: air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, geology and soils, and noise and vibration
Fehr & Peers: transportation and traffic
HELIX Environmental Planning: cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and biological resources
RWDI: wind
PreVision Design: visual simulations and shade and shadow The Urban Planning Partners team will collaboratively manage this project withacore team toensure we can beextremely responsive and meet varied project demands andthedesiredschedule. Lynette Dias, President, will betheprincipal-in-charge; Carla Violet, Associate Principal, will betheproject manager.

Carla will be responsible for day-to-day project coordination with the city and our subconsultants.

Our team recognizes the significance ofthis project and its potential for public sensitivity and controversy. Toensureexperienced leadership throughout, bothLynette Dias, Principal-in-Charge at Lynette Dias, Principal
388 17th Street, Suite 230
Oakland, CA 94612
T 510. 251. 8210
M 510. 206.4456
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 6 Urban Planning Partners, and Sam Tabibnia, Senior Associate at Fehr & Peers, will participateinall client and public meetings. Lynette and Sam each have over 25 years of experience managing high-profile and often controversial environmental review projects across the Bay Area.

Urban Planning Partners is committed toschedule and budget. We diligently manage our commitments with weekly, monthly, andquarterly projections. Weconsider each potential assignment carefully and only commit toprojects we have the resources tocomplete. Given our relatively small size, we have an established history of successfully managing very large and challenging projects in controversial environments with ambitious schedules.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 7 2 . AP P R O A C H & S C O P E O F WO R K
This section outlines Urban Planning Partners’ recommended approach andscopeof work for preparing an EIR for the Sutter Health Medical Center project (project). Our recommended approach is based on review oftheavailable project materials, discussions with City staff, and our knowledge oftheplanning processes and regulations inthe City of Emeryville.

Based onour team’s understanding oftheproject anddiscussions with City staff, webelieve an EIR will be required given theintensity of development proposed and anticipated significant impacts. The EIR will evaluate both the medical office and residential variants for Building 1 across all environmental topics.

Our scope of work has been developed inaccordance with the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines and incorporates additional non-CEQA analysis requestedby the City, specifically related totransportation and aesthetics.

SCOPE OF WORK
Our approach, as detailed inthis section and outlined in Table 1, includes three sequential phases:

1. Project Initiation,

2. Draft EIR, and

3. Response to Comments Document/Final EIR
An ongoing project management and meetings component that will occur throughout the duration of theproject is also included. This component includes general project management, staff and project meetings, and preparation oftheadministrative record.

A summary of our proposed work program is provided in Table 1. All thetasks necessary tocomplete an EIR and address the City’s standard non-CEQA analysis items are detailed in the scope of work.

PROJECT INITIATION
The following tasks include a kick-off meeting, site visit, base map preparation, data gathering and evaluation, and the project description.

TASK 1A. PROJECT INITIATION
The project initiation task for the project will provide an opportunity for the Urban Planning Partners team tocollaborate with the city torefine our recommended scope of work and project schedule.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 8 TABLE 1 WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY
PHASE 1. PROJECT INITIATION
TASK 1A. PROJECT INITIATION

1. Kick-Off Meeting/Site Visit

2. Data Gathering and Evaluation

3. Base Map Preparation

4. Project Description
TASK 1B. NOTICE OF PREPARATION

1. Administrative Draft NOP

2. Screencheck Draft NOP

3. Public Review NOP
TASK 1C. SCOPING MEETING
TASK 1D. REVIEW OF NOP COMMENTS/ WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT PHASE 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
TASK 2A. EFFECTS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT

1. Agriculture and Forest Resources

2. Mineral Resources

3. Wildfire
TASK 2B. PLANS AND POLICIES
TASK 2C. SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES

1. Land Use

2. Transportation

3. Air Quality

4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

5. Energy

6. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources

7. Geology and Soils

8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials

9. Hydrology and Water Quality

10. Noise and Vibration

11. Population and Housing

12. Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities

13. Biological Resources

14. Aesthetic Resources (Wind & Shade/Shadow)
TASK 2D. CEQA REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS
TASK 2E. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
TASK 2F. PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR

1. Administrative Draft EIR

2. Screencheck Draft EIR

3. Public Review Draft EIR
TASK 2G. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND FINDINGS TASK 2H. DRAFT EIR HEARINGS
PHASE 3. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT/ FINAL EIR
TASK 3A. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT/ FINAL EIR

1. Administrative Draft RTC Document

2. Screencheck Draft RTC Document

3. Final RTC Document
TASK 3B. EIR CERTIFICATION HEARINGS

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS

STAFF AND PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 9 1. Kick-Off Meeting/ Site Visit
Urban Planning Partners will meet with City staff todiscuss expectations regarding the tasks tobe undertaken as part ofthe environmental documentation effort. We will prepare and circulate an agenda for this meeting. Topics for discussion at this meeting will include:

Team composition andrespective roles of consultants and City staff.

The City’s desired approach toinvolving various City departments during preparation ofthe EIR and review oftheadministrative and screencheck drafts (or portions thereof).

When andhow frequently weshould holdstanding meetings.

Current project plans anddefining theproject for CEQA.

Review and confirmation of what topics can be focused out and addressed as part of an “Effects Found Not tobe Significant” section included in the Draft EIR.

Determining what should beincorporated inthecumulative scenario.

Potential project alternatives.

Project schedule.

As one ofthe initial steps, Urban Planning Partners will undertake a site visit toobserve the project site.

Urban Planning Partners staff will identify existing conditions, study area features, and confirm information provided inprevious studies. We encourage attendanceby City staff and Sutter Health at our initial site visit topromote cooperation indiscussing observations. This site visit could be combined with the kick-off meeting or held separately.

2. Data Gathering and Evaluation
Existing dataandanalyses applicable totheproposed project will becollectedandevaluated togainan understanding ofthe available information that will beused as part ofthe environmental review. Urban Planning Partners will review relevant planning policy and CEQA documentation previously prepared for projects within thearea and surrounding neighborhoods. Urban Planning Partners will also contact responsible or potentially affected agencies toidentify issues for theproposed project.

3. Base Map Preparation
A base mapoftheproject siteandvicinity will beprepared by Urban Planning Partners usingthebest available mapinformation from thecity. The base map will beused toillustrate street/highway andlot layouts in the project site vicinity, theproject site’s relationship tosurrounding areas, topography, surrounding land uses, and General Plan and zoning designations. The base map will beavailable for consultant and staff use during meetings and presentations.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 10 4. Project Description
Urban Planning Partners will prepare a project description based on materials provided by Sutter Health.

The project description will include a discussion of key characteristics ofthe project site and vicinity, project objectives, details of theproject, the approval process, and the anticipated development schedule. It will also includedescriptions ofthetwoproposed variants for Building 1: onefor medical office use and one for residential apartments.

A draft ofthe project description will besubmitted to Sutter Health and the City for review and acceptance prior tothe Urban Planning Partners team conducting any quantitative impact analyses. Up totwodrafts will beprepared inresponse tocomments received.

TASK 1B. NOTICE OF PREPARATION
Urban Planning Partners will prepare a Notice of Preparation (NOP) that will include a brief project description and a determination that an EIR is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the project. The NOP will also briefly describe what topics are anticipated tobe analyzed inthe EIR and which topics will just briefly bediscussed under effects found nottobesignificant. Uptotwodrafts will bepreparedin response to City comments. An electronic fileofthe NOP will be provided tothe city for posting onthe City’s website and for distribution. Urban Planning Partners will submit the NOP tothe State Clearinghouse.

TASK 1C. SCOPING MEETING
Urban Planning Partners will prepare for, attend, andpresent at onepublic scoping session beforethe Planning Commission. After the meeting, Urban Planning Partners will summarize andreview all public comments and identify any changes required in the work program (see Task 1D). We will ensure that each substantive comment received, including written and verbal, related tothescope ofthe EIR is addressed in the EIR.

TASK 1D. REVIEW OF NOP COMMENTS/ WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT It may benecessary torefine thescope of work inaccordance withinformationcompiledintheabove subtasks and based on the preliminary findings. Following completion ofthepublic comment period and receipt and review of all ofthe comments onthe NOP (see Task 1B), Urban Planning Partners will work with planning staff torefine thescope of work, if necessary, toaddress any new environmental issues identifiedinthe NOP comments. Urban Planning Partners will present therevisedscopeof work and budget for review and approval tothe City and will provide the revised budget to Sutter Health.

DRAFT EIR
As part ofthis phase, the Urban Planning Partners team will prepare the Draft EIR and conduct an analysis for each environmental topic relevant tothe project inaccordance with the City’s thresholds.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 11 The following topics will beanalyzed as potentially significant impacts: landuse, transportation, air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy, cultural resources and tribal cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise and vibration, public services and utilities, biological resources, and aesthetic (wind and shade/shadow) resources. All other topics are anticipated tobeaddressed as effects found tobeless thansignificant (see Task 2A below). An alternatives analysis will also be completed as part ofthe Draft EIR.

TASK 2A. EFFECTS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT
Urban Planning Partners anticipates that the project’s impact relative tothe following topics will be less than significant:
agricultureandforest resources
mineral resources
wildfire
We will provideabrief discussion of eachofthese topics anddocument why theproject’s impact will not be significant. We anticipate that the level of analysis and discussion for these topics will besimilar to what is typically included inan Initial Study.

TASK 2B. PLANS AND POLICIES
Urban Planning Partners will complete anevaluationofthe Sutter Health Medical Center project’s consistency withrelevant City planning andenvironmental policies from thefollowing documents:

Active Transportation Plan
Climate Action Plan
Complete Streets Policy
Housing Element 2023-2031
Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan
Sustainable Transportation Plan
Local Road Safety Plan (expected adoptioninJune2025)
The analysis will focus onpolicies that address potential physical environmental impacts.

TASK 2C. SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The work conducted as part ofthis task will be incorporated into the administrative Draft EIR and will constitute the major portion ofthe Draft EIR. Each environmental topic section will include: 1) a description ofthe existing setting relevant tothe proposed project including regulatory setting; 2) significance criteria; 3) impacts evaluation; and4) mitigation measures necessary toreduce potentially significant impacts. This scope does not include the preparation of separate technical reports; all information and findings will bedetailed in the EIR and as appropriate technical data in appendices tothe EIR.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 12 1. Land Use
In the section, Urban Planning Partners will provide land use context for the proposed project. Urban Planning Partners will provide adescription ofthe surrounding land uses. While significant land use impacts are not anticipated, the section will offer a more detailed planning framework and demonstrate theproject’s consistency withapplicable local policies under bothproject variants.

2. Transportation
Fehr & Peers will prepare the transportation analysis for the EIR and thenon-CEQA analysis. The work they will complete includes:

Task 1 – Project Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, and Study Assumptions Fehr & Peers will estimatethedaily and weekday AM, weekday PM, and Saturday peak hour net new automobiletripgenerationfor bothproject variants based onthedataand methodology inthelatest version ofthe Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, supplemented by available tripdata specific to Sutter Medical Centers.

Since ITE data is generally based on data collected at suburban sites where almost all trips are by automobile, we will adjusttheITE-basedtripgeneration toaccount fortheproject location in Emeryville, where some trips are expected tobe by transit, walking, or bicycling. Trips from existing uses that would beeliminated will also factor into the net trip generation assessment based on the ITE data. We will also develop trip estimates for walking, bicycling, and transit trips generated by the project.

We will developvehicle tripdistribution for theproject based ontherelative location of complementary land uses, theestimated catchment area for project employees and patient/visitors, the relative locations offreeway on- and off-ramps, and the existing traffic patterns and traffic congestion inthe Project vicinity. To theextent feasible, we will use other sources such as Alameda County Transportation Commission (CTC) Travel Demand Model, andbigdatasources, suchas Replica or StreetLight, to identify the likely origin and destination and routing of project employees and patients/visitors.

Based on conversations with the City of Emeryville, we identified a preliminary set of 79 study intersections (shown on Figure 7) where the Project may appreciably add vehicle traffic and/or represent intersections where theaddition of project traffic totheroadway network may appreciably affectthe operations of planned multimodal investments. We will refine this list of study intersections based onthe estimated vehicle tripgeneration and distribution. For budgeting purposes, this scope of work assumes 79 study intersections.

Fehr & Peers will summarize theresults of Task 1ina memorandum and submitittothe City of Emeryville toreview andapprove. If necessary, the memorandum will alsoprovide modifications tothis scope of work. The assumptions memorandum will also outline the methods we propose toevaluate the Project’s effect on the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian systems, as well as outline the vehicle mile traveled VMT) assessment. We will respond totworounds of comments before the memorandum is finalized.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 13 FIGURE 7 STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATION
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 14 Task 2 – Data Collection, Project Trip Assignment and Intersection Volume Forecasts Based onthestudy locations identified in Task 1, Fehr & Peers will obtain weekday morning (7:00 AM to 10:00 AM) andevening (3:30 PM to6:30 PM) peak period intersection turning movement counts, including separate counts of vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, and trucks. Fehr & Peers will also obtain existing and planned signal timings for the signalized intersections, planned changes toroadway geometries, and proposed near-term land use development projects. This scope of work assumes that we will collect new counts at all study intersections onaday withgood weather conditions andlocal schools in session. During the traffic count data collection, Fehr & Peers will observe traffic conditions and queues at and between the study intersections toinform calibration ofthe traffic operations microsimulation model in Task 3, as well as verify lane geometries and signal timings.

Using thecollected counts, Fehr & Peers will develop AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes under the following scenarios:

Existing Conditions – Existing conditions based onthestudy intersection traffic counts.

Near-Term Conditions – Existing Conditions plus traffic generated by other pending landuse projects expected tobedeveloped inthenext 5to10 years and updated traffic patterns androadway geometries due toplanned changes tothe transportation network, including the Emeryville Loop Project, the 40th Street Multimodal Project, and the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project. We will confirm the final list ofland use projects and transportation network changes with City staff.

Near-Term Plus Project Conditions, Variant 1 – Near-Term Conditions plus thetraffic generated by the Project under Variant 1.

Near-Term Plus Project Conditions, Variant 2 – Near-Term Conditions plus the traffic generated by the Project under Variant 2.

Since mostfreeways and major arterials inthe Project vicinity operate at- or over-capacity during peak periods, they constrain the traffic volumes that could enter the study area during the peak hours. As a result, not all the traffic wishing toenter the study area during the peak hours could enter thestudy area.

The traffic volumes developed for the three future conditions scenarios will account for these upstream bottlenecks. We will document these upstream bottleneck locations andpresent boththeconstrained and unconstrained traffic volumes at the study intersections. The traffic analysis described in Task 3 will becompleted for the constrained volumes only.

Task 3 – VISSIM Operations Analysis
The primary travel routes between the project site and I-80/I-580 experience congestion, including queue spillback from the freeway ramps, with closely spaced intersections, which typical isolated intersection analysis methodologies donotfully capture. Additionally, multipleprojects currently under development inthe City of Emeryville would reallocate space away from automobiles towards bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. These projects were developed under different land use assumptions and did not account for the project. To reflect the complexity ofthe network and ensure that theproject’s effects on these planned multimodal projects areidentified, Fehr & Peers will developa VISSIM 2025 microsimulation model toanalyze roadway operations for the scenarios listed under Task 2.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 15 Task 3A – VISSIM Model Building and Calibration
Fehr & Peers will develop a VISSIM 2025 microsimulation model thatincludes thestudy intersections shown on Figure 7 during the AM and PM peak hours under thescenarios describedin Task 2. We will calibrate the model toreflect existing conditions based on the collected traffic data, existing signal timings, and observed traffic conditions and queues.

For thefuture scenarios, we will use theplanned signal timings developed for the40th Street, San Pablo Avenue, EmeryvilleLoop, and Emeryville Quiet Zone projects as aninput andoptimizethem toaccount for expected traffic volumes with the project. We will also review and incorporate transit and roadway changes from the surrounding projects, including the I-80/Powell Street Interchange Transit Access Improvements.

Task 3B – VISSIM Model Execution
Fehr & Peers will run the VISSIM model 20 times for each peak hour under each study scenario. We will select the10 most representative and clustered model runs for each scenario toreport operations. Model outputs for eachscenario will include intersection level of service (LOS) andaveragedelay, percent demand volume served, and average and 95th vehicle queues at each study intersection.

Task 3C – Travel Time Analysis
Fehr & Peers will use the VISSIM microsimulation networks toassess the project effects ontransit travel times for up to12 transit routes in the project vicinity.

We will also evaluate project effects ontheemergency response travel times for the Alameda County Fire Department Stations #34and #35tolocations south oftheproject. The project effects on emergency response travel time will be evaluated qualitatively based on the VISSIM analysis outputs, including signal-related delay, and planned roadway changes in the project definition, as defined in Task 3A. This scope assumes travel times analysis for up to10 emergency response routes.

Task 3D – Signal Warrant Analysis
Fehr & Peers will conduct asignal warrant analysis for the33 unsignalized study intersections inthestudy area, using the California MUTCD peak hour vehicular volume warrant (Warrant 3) for urban conditions to determine ifthe traffic added by the project would result in the need for signalizing these intersections.

The signal warrants analysis will be conducted for the AM and PM peak hours under the study scenarios for both project variants.

Task 4 – Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) Analysis
Consistent with SB 743 requirements, Fehr & Peers will conduct a VMT analysis for bothproject variants todetermine how theexpected VMT generated per employee (for thehospital and MOB uses) and per capita (for the residential uses) compares toregional and citywide averages. We will first conduct a VMT Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 16 assessment basedonthescreening criteria established inthe Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) guidance todetermine ifthe project can be presumed tohave a less-than-significant impact on VMT.

We will also conduct adetailed VMT assessment that estimates project daily VMT per employee under Variant 1 and project daily VMT per employee and daily VMT per resident under Variant 2 using the Alameda CTC Travel Demand Model. Although local agencies have discretion toestablish VMT-related significance criteria, OPR guidance specifies that a project with VMT per employee or VMT per capita 15 percent less than regional values would be considered less-than-significant. We will also estimate the total VMT generated by the project for both project variants.

Task 5 – Congestion Management Program Analysis
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires theuse ofthe Alameda CTC Countywide Travel Demand Model toassess theimpacts onregional roadways near theproject siteshould theproject generate more than 100 PM peak hour trips. Since itis expected that theproject would generate more than 100 peak hour trips, this scope assumes the evaluation of up to60 CMP roadway and freeway segments under 2020 and 2040 conditions for both project variants. Itis expected that the Alameda CTC will identify the CMP network roadways intheir comment letter ontheproject NOP.

In addition, we will assess theproject’s effects on the regional transit, bicycle, and pedestrian system per the CMP Land Use analysis program. The findings ofthis analysis related tothe automobile system will also be correlated with the findings from the VMT assessment.

Task 6 – Parking Demand and Supply Analysis
Fehr & Peers will estimatetheproject peak parkingdemandonatypical weekday for bothproject variants andcompare them totheavailable parking supply. Similar tothetripgenerationprocess, we will primarily rely on the data inITE Parking Generation Manual (6th Edition), supplemented by available data specific to Sutter Medical Centers. If necessary, we will also account for the higher level of walking, bicycling, and transit trips in the project area compared tonational data.

Task 7 – Site and Circulation Analysis
Fehr & Peers will review the project site plan and the existing street network within one block ofthe project site toevaluate, including identifying how needs might be different between the twoproject variants, anddevelop recommendations relatedtosafety, access, andcirculation for all travel modes for the following:

Site access for automobiles, bicyclists, and pedestrians, including access tothenearest bus and shuttle stops, and the Amtrak station
Sight distance for pedestrians andautomobiles attheproject driveways Emergency vehicle access, including integration with ITS/signals citywide Vehicular safety, access, and circulation
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 17 Pedestrian safety, access, circulation, andinfrastructure gaps, including assessment of pedestrian facilities, such as crosswalk treatments, signal equipment, sidewalk widths, and ADA considerations throughout the Project site and tothe nearest transit stops and first/last-mile transit hubs Bicycle safety, access, circulation, andinfrastructure gaps, including thestreets connecting the Project sitetothenearest bicycle facilities andconnections tofirst/last-miletransit hubs Assessment of potential extension ofthe Horton Street and 53rd Street bicycle facilities in the project area, including analysis offit, function, and routing
Location, type, and amount of bicycle parking
Siteaccess andcirculation for trucks anddeliveries, including maneuverability to/from loadingdocks Need for and location of passenger, accessible (ADA) passenger, and commercial loading zones Adequacy of bus stop infrastructure serving thesite transit users Assessment offirst/last-mileconnections tothe Emeryville Transit Center (Amtrak), San Pablo Transit Hub, and MacArthur and West Oakland BART stations, including Emery Go-Round routings, shuttle routings, and pick-up locations
Qualitative assessment of access and circulation for various travel modes and parking demand during theconstruction phases ofthe project
Totheextentfeasible, thesiteplananalysis will beconsistent withthe Safe System Approach analysis established in the City of Emeryville’ s Local Road Safety Plan (expected adoption in June 2025).

Task 8 – Collision History Analysis
Fehr & Peers will review five years of collision history (vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle) at up to20 study intersections, and 10 road segments serving the Project site. We will review the collision data for all modes and identify ifthere are any crash patterns by collision type, severity, primary collision factor, and movement. We will also develop predicted crash frequencies for each study location based on Part C of the Highway Safety Manual. These predicted crash frequencies will be compared against the observed crash frequencies toidentify if any ofthe study locations experience a higher than predicted number of collisions.

Based onthe Project’s tripassignment, we will determine ifthe Project’s added traffic would contribute toa study location with a higher than predicted number of collisions, and if so, we will identify potential treatments. There may be multiple potential treatment options. We will document the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) for each treatment option (along with the CMF’s standard error and quality rating). The analysis will focus on4- and5-star quality CMFs with3-star quality appliedunder limited circumstances. CMF sources will include Part D ofthe Highway Safety Manual and the CMF Clearinghouse. We will provide a list oftreatments atlocations toaddress the higher than predicted number of collisions for thecity toconsider. If a treatment would affect intersection operations, we will evaluate thepotential impact using the Synchro software or the Vissim network developed in Task 3.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 18 Task 9 – Plan Consistency Analysis
Fehr & Peers will review the City ofEmeryville’s adopted Plans and Policies pertaining totransportation, includingthe City’s Local Road Safety Planand2023 Active Transportation Plan, andassess the Project’s consistency with them. The documents that we will review will be identified at the Project kick-off meeting.

Task 10 – Alternatives Assessment
Fehr & Peers will estimate thetripgeneration for up tothree project alternatives. We will use the trip generation results toqualitatively compare theimpacts ofthe alternatives with the project.

Task 11 – Transportation Demand Management Plan
Fehr & Peers will prepare a TDM Plan for the Project containing strategies tohelp reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, on-site parking demand, and VMT for the Project. Strategies may consist of onetimeinfrastructure improvements suchas bicycle parking andimproved pedestrian connections, andongoing operational strategies such as a shuttle service (including requirements related torouting, stop location, and signage, as well as the potential expansion of Emery Go-Round and/or Sutter shuttles) and transit subsidies. The TDM measures will primarily target daytime employees atthe site who are most likely tobenefit from such programs because they commute toandfrom thesiteduring thepeak travel periods when most non-automobile options are available. However, many ofthe measures would also benefit employees during other shifts as well as patients and visitors tothe site.

We will develop a list of programs, measures, and incentives that account for the Project size, specific uses, parkingsupply, andlocation. The TDM Plan will also include the measures that Sutter implements attheir sites. For each measure, we will identify the affected population, the party responsible and timing for implementation, and order-of-magnitude cost estimate. To the extent feasible, we will estimate the effectiveness of each proposed measure in reducing the Project tripgeneration, parking demand, and VMT based onavailable sources, such as the Alameda CTC VMT Reduction Calculator Tool, and/or the Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association [CAPCOA], December 2021).

Based onthecombined effectiveness oftheproposed measures, the TDM Plan will establisha reasonable vehicle reduction goal that can be achieved. The TDM Plan will also address theresponsibility for mitigations, timing, monitoring, evaluation (including who conducts/pays for the review), and enforcement ofthe TDM program.

Optional Task 12 – Saturday Analysis
As anoptional task, Fehr & Peers will conduct theoperational analysis described in Task 3 for the Saturday peak hour under each ofthefour scenarios describedin Task 2. This task also includes collection of multimodal traffic counts at all study intersections during the Saturday peak period (1:00 PM to3:00 PM) and development ofintersection volume forecasts for the Saturday peak hour at all study Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 19 intersections under eachofthefour scenarios. Itis expected the City will determine whether optional Task 14 should beconducted following submittal ofthe Task 1 draft study assumptions memorandum.

3. Air Quality
Baseline will prepare an EIR section toevaluate potential impact related toair quality. Based on preliminary review oftheproject, theprimary air quality concerns will likely berelated tothenetincrease inemissions of criteria air pollutants and theexposure of nearby receptors (e.g., residences) totoxic air contaminants (TACs) during project construction and operation. The project would emit diesel particulate matter (DPM), a type of TAC, from the use of diesel-powered equipment during construction.

Itis alsoassumed thattheproject will emit DPM from maintenance andtesting of emergency diesel generators during operation.

Potential air quality impacts for both project variants will be assessed inaccordance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. The net emissions of criteria air pollutants during project construction andoperation will beestimated using the most current version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) and/or spreadsheets using similar methodologies.

Health risks associated with DPM emissions during project construction and operation will be assessed based ontheresults of air dispersion modeling. Baseline will also prepare a cumulative health risk assessment toincludeexisting andforeseeable futuresources of TACs, such as major roadways, railroads, and stationary sources located near the project site. The health risks from the cumulative sources of TACs in the project vicinity will beevaluated using the BAAQMD’s online air quality analysis tools.

Baselineassumes thattheproject applicant will provideinformationontheproposed construction activities (schedule, soil import/export, and equipment activity) and operations (stationary sources and helicopter trips). Baseline assumes that the project traffic analyst will provide information on the existing and proposed traffic conditions (trip generation, vehicle miles traveled, fleet mix). Existing regulations that would beapplicable totheproject will bediscussed and incorporated intotheanalysis. The project’s estimated net emissions of criteria air pollutants and health risk impacts will becompared with the BAAQMD’s recommended thresholds of significance. Baseline will prepare mitigation measures, as needed, toreduce any potentially significant impacts toless-than-significant levels, iffeasible.

4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Baseline will prepare an EIR section toevaluate potential impacts related togreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The analysis will include an overview ofthe environmental setting and regulatory framework.

Potential GHG emissions impacts will beassessed for bothproject variants inaccordance withthe BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. For informational purposes, the net emissions of GHG emissions during project construction and operation will beestimated using the most current version of CalEEMod and/or spreadsheets using similar methodologies. The project design elements for achieving California’s long-term climate goal of carbonneutrality by 2045 will becompared tothe BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance for typical land use projects. Because the hospital building (building 8) is not atypical land use, Baseline will coordinate with the BAAQMD todetermine an alternative approach toanalysis, if necessary. Baseline will also analyze the project’s consistency with applicable local and state GHG Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 20 reduction plans, suchas the California Air Resources Board’s 2022 Scoping Planandthe City of Emeryville’ s Climate Action Plan. Baseline will prepare mitigation measures, as needed, toreduce any potentially significant impacts toless-than-significant levels, iffeasible.

5. Energy
Baseline will prepare an EIR section toevaluate potential impacts related toenergy resources. The analysis will include an overview ofthe environmental setting and regulatory framework. Baseline will evaluate the project’s impacts for both variants on energy resources by identifying the project’s proposed energy-saving features, projected energy consumption, consistency with applicable energy efficiency policies andstandards, andthepotential need for new energy supplies or facilities toserve theproject.

Energy use during construction and operation will be calculated using information from CalEEMod and the project transportation analysis. Baseline will prepare mitigation measures, as needed, toreduce any potentially significant impacts toless-than-significant levels, iffeasible.

6. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
HELIX will prepare an EIR section toevaluate potential impacts related tocultural resources and tribal cultural resources. To inform this section, HELIX will prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment as described below. It will also bebased on outreach and engagement with thetribal community under the auspices of Assembly Bill (AB) 52compliance. As such, HELIX will require theresults ofthe City’s AB 52 consultation outreach totribes, as well as documentation ofthat process. Atthe City’s direction, HELIX can assist with the facilitation ofthe AB 52 process by drafting outreach letters for the City’s review, as well as attend any AB 52 consultation meetings that occur. These services are included in the estimated feeas anoptional task.

Records Search, Background Research, and Native American Outreach: HELIX will conduct an archaeological and historical records review and literature search through the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) ofthe California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. The records searcharea will include the Study Area, which consists of buildings, parking lots, roadways, and developed greenspaces (totaling approximately 28 acres), and a 0.25-mile radius.

The purpose ofthe records search is to: (1) identify cultural resources previously documented within and immediately adjacent tothe Study Area; (2) todetermine ifthe Study Area has been previously surveyed, when those surveys took place, and how the surveys were conducted; and (3) toascertain thepotential for cultural resources tobefound within the Study Area and a0.25-mile radius. This proposal assumes that the records search fee will not exceed $700.

As part ofthebackground research, HELIX will contact the Native American Heritage Commission NAHC) toconduct a search oftheir Sacred Lands File (SLF) for the presence of Native American sacred sites or human remains in the vicinity ofthe Study Area. Once the results ofthe SLF search are received HELIX will send outreach emails toatleast one point of Native American contact for each tribe identified by the NAHC as potential sources ofinformation related totribal andcultural resources inthevicinity of the Study Area.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 21 The project siteis aheavily developed urbanareathatis unlikely tocontain exposed native soils visible at the ground surface; therefore, no archaeological survey is proposed as part ofthis scope of work. Instead, theresults of HELIX’s records search, background research, and Native American outreach will beused to make recommendations regarding the archaeological sensitivity ofthe Study Area. Itis assumed that no archaeological cultural resources will beidentified during HELIX’s records search, background research, and Native American Outreach that will require formal recordation in the field nor formal evaluation against the eligibility criteria ofthe National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). If cultural resources are identified during the course of HELIX’s cultural study, efforts required for theformal recordation andor evaluationofthese cultural resources would need tobe furnished through a contract augment.

Built Environment Baseline Conditions Analysis: A HELIX Senior Architectural Historian will identify the baseline conditions for thebuilt environment oftheproject siteandaone-block buffer radius. This analysis will includeinformation from therecords search andasearch oflocal inventories, thevisual presentation ofthe individual properties and streetscapes that define the project site and its relationship toits surroundings as observed during a site visit, and focused archival research. Based onthis analysis, HELIX will identify any built-environment resources that would require evaluation todetermine ifthey may qualify as historical resources as defined at Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; this evaluation would need tobe completed tofill any gaps in the baseline conditions for cultural resources, as well as to inform the environmental review. If built environment resources are identified during the course of HELIX’s cultural study which require formal recordation and evaluation, these resources will be photographed, briefly recorded vianarrative notes, anddocumented via GPS.

7. Geology and Soils
Baseline will prepare an EIR section toevaluate theproject’s potential impacts related togeology and soils. The project site is not located inan Alquist-Priolo (AP) Fault Zone; however, theproject site is located inaseismically active area. A significant earthquake ononeoftheregional faults near theproject site will likely produce very strong ground shaking during the life ofthe project. The project site is not located in a liquefaction or landslide hazard area mapped by the California Geologic Survey.

Based on geotechnical evaluations oftheproject site (if available) and other available reports and maps, Baseline will prepare asummary oftheexisting environmental settingandevaluatepotential impacts associated with the project. Baseline will also describe the regulatory framework related togeology.

Baseline will evaluate the project’s proposed approach toregulatory compliance. Baseline will develop mitigation measures, as necessary, toreduceany potentially significant impacts toaless-than-significant level, iffeasible.

8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Baseline will prepare an EIR section evaluating potential hazards andhazardous materials impacts for bothproject variants. Theanalysis will includeanoverview oftheenvironmental setting andregulatory framework. Based ona preliminary review ofinformation available onthe State Water Resources Control Board’s GeoTracker database, multiple hazardous materials releases have been reported on and adjacent tothe project site. Contaminants of concern in soil and groundwater include polychlorinated biphenyls Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 22 PCBs), metals, volatile organic compounds (including trichloroethylene), andpetroleum hydrocarbons.

Deed restrictions have been recorded at the project site due toresidual contamination. The deed restrictions prohibit future development for hospitals and residential land uses and require, among other things, that contaminated soils be managed inaccordance witha Risk Management Plan.

Baseline will review previous environmental investigations, remediation, andlanduse restrictions documented onthe GeoTracker database toevaluate subsurface contamination that could potentially be disturbed during project construction and operation. Baseline will also describe other public health and safety issues related tohazardous materials, emergency response, aviation, and wildfire hazards at the project site. Baseline will develop mitigation measures, as necessary, toreduceany potentially significant impacts toa less-than-significant level, iffeasible.

Baseline assumes that theproject applicant will provide project-specific details regarding the characterization of soils for reuse and/or disposal, plans for additional investigation and/or remediation tosupport theproject (if any), plans for updating the Risk Management Plan (if any), andplans for updating or removing the existing deed restrictions toallow for the development of hospitals and residences on the project site. This scope of work does not include coordination with regulatory agencies regarding theoversight ofinvestigation, cleanup, andlong-term management activities relatedto residual contamination ontheproject site.

9. Hydrology and Water Quality
Baseline will prepare an EIR section evaluating potential hydrology and water quality impacts for both project variants. Baseline will prepare a summary ofthe setting related tohydrology and water quality based onproject plans and published materials/maps. Baseline will evaluate potential impacts tosurface and groundwater quality, flooding, alterations tosurface flows/runoff, erosion and sedimentation, stormwater treatment, and drainage into existing off-site stormwater drainage systems. Existing regulations for hydrology and water quality that would beapplicable tothe project will be discussed, including National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for construction and post-construction. Baseline will evaluate the project’s proposed approach toregulatory compliance. Baseline will develop mitigation measures, as necessary, toreduce any potentially significant impacts toa less-than-significant level, iffeasible.

10. Noise and Vibration
Baseline will prepare an EIR section evaluating potential noise and vibration impacts for both project variants. The analysis will include an overview ofthe environmental setting and regulatory framework.

The primary sources of existing ambient noise levels intheproject vicinity are from nearby roadways.

The existing noise levels in the project area will be discussed based onthenoise contour maps from the City’s General Plan and traffic data provided by theproject’s transportation analyst.

Potential noise and vibration levels during project construction and operation will be evaluated to determinecompliance withthenoise standards established inthe City’s General Plan and Municipal Code. Baseline assumes that the project applicant will provide information on the proposed construction activities (schedule, soil import/export, and equipment activity) and operations (mechanical equipment Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 23 andhelicopter trips) that could generatenoise andvibration. Baseline will prepare mitigation measures, as needed, toreduce any potentially significant impacts toless-than-significant levels.

11. Population and Housing
Withinthepopulationandhousing section, Urban Planning Partners will document thearea’s existing population andhousing characteristics for boththe City of Emeryville andthe San Francisco Bay Area region based upon available demographic and survey data, including information contained within the City’s Housing Element. Potential population and housing impacts for both project variants will be evaluated inrelation toexisting city-wide population and housing demographics.

12. Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities
Urban Planning Partners will describe theexisting utility infrastructure and public services that serve the city and project site based oninformation available from theutility providers. The following utilities and services will be evaluated: schools, police, fire, parks and recreation facilities, waste disposal, wastewater, stormwater and water supply, telecommunications, andelectricity and gas.

Urban Planning Partners will work with City staff and representatives of each facility and service provider toconfirm that the approach previously used for analyzing each ofthese services is appropriate. The following subtasks will be completed in order toconfirm an understanding of existing service levels and todetermine theability of eachservice provider toservetheproposed project. Theproject will also require a Water Supply Assessment.

Collect and review available data. Urban Planning Partners will contact each City Department Head or service provider tosummarize conditions on the project site.

Provide brief project description tofacility and/or service providers. Urban Planning Partners will develop acondensed project description, which can then be shared with utility and/or service providers such that they can perform an internal analysis in order toconfirm their ability to meet increased demands for services and facilities.

Obtaininputfrom utility andservice providers. Urban Planning Partners will solicit andobtain information about existing utilities and services from the local providers. Facility and service providers will be asked torespond tothe information provided tothem.

Describe existingpublic facilities andservices. Basedoninformationprovided by each service provider, Urban Planning Partners will describe the existing facilities and services intheproject site vicinity. This review may consider issues such as infrastructure capacity and condition, generation and service radius.

Development that may occur from implementation oftheproject will result inanincrease intheexisting demand for public services and utilities. Urban Planning Partners will update the impact evaluation on each ofthe facility and service providers. The assessment will examine thedemand for services generated by population and employment growth atthe site. Urban Planning Partners will assess the effects of project implementation (under bothproject variants) ontheneeds for expansion of existing services and/or utilities and any physical impacts that may result from such expansions.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 24 The need for coordination among facility andservice providers andtheproject applicantfor on- or offsite improvements will be addressed toensure that any potentially significant impacts are mitigated to less-than-significant levels. Urban Planning Partners will describe potential impacts associated with utilities and services and project mitigation measures will be recommended.

13. Biological Resources
The project site is located in a mostly urban area onan already developed site. For this reason, most impacts related to Biological Resources are expected tobeless than significant, which Urban Planning Partners will explain. However, due totheproject’s height, form, and proximity tothe San Francisco Bay, impacts relatedtobirdstrikes could potentially result insignificant impacts. Toaddress this, HELIX Environmental Planning will provide a bird study that will describe the factors contributing tobird collisions and will describe the design features that must be included in a Bird Collision Reduction Plan to mitigate the potential for avian mortality resulting from bird collisions.

14. Aesthetic Resources ( Wind and Shade and Shadow)
Under CEQA Guidelines Section 21099(d), “Aesthetic and parking impacts of a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project on an infill site located within a transit priority area shall not be considered significant impacts on the environment.” 2 The project sitedoes meetthecriteria andas a result Aesthetic impacts will not beconsidered significant. However, thecity has requested that visual simulations be prepared toprovide an informational assessment ofthe project. Additionally given the height ofthe project, an analysis of potential wind and shade and shadow impacts will be prepared.

Urban Planning Partners will draft the aesthetics, wind, and shadow section ofthe EIR based onthe technical analysis that will becompletedby Prevision Design and RWDI as outlinedbelow.

Visual Simulations
Viewpoint Scoping
Prevision Design will work withthecity and/or theproject sponsor toselect potentially appropriate viewpoints for visual simulations using web-based Google Earth services. 12-15potential viewpoints will be initially prepared and presented for review and selection of up to10 viewpoints. This task assumes preparation work, attendance at a working meeting, and production of apotential viewpoints map.

Site Photography
Prevision Design will conduct site photography at predetermined locations togenerate existing condition views for use as the base of visual simulations. Prevision Design will select and present the best viewpoints + alternates from all the locations photographed totheclient and/or the sponsor for review andselectionofthefinal photographic viewpoints. This task assumes sorting andselection of 2CEQA Guidelines Section 21099(d)(1).

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 25 recommended photographic views andattendanceat a working meetingtoselect upto10 final viewpoints.

Draft / Final Visual Simulations
Using the approved viewpoint photos, Prevision Design will align the 3D model to match the perspective and scale of each viewpoint photo. Using photoreal rendering techniques (unless otherwise specified), Prevision Design will generate draft photo simulations ofthe project within the photographic context for review, comment andrevisionas needed. Uponapproval ofthese draft views, final views will be generated which will include fine tuning, and photoshop work toclean up foreground and background details and add additional site context as necessary.

Wind
Pedestrian Wind Study (Wind Tunnel Modeling)
RWDI will provide apedestrian windstudy topredict windspeeds inpedestrian areas andanassessment of how they impact thecomfort of people in outdoor spaces. The proposed Pedestrian Wind Study involves testing a three-dimensional physical scale model ofthe development and surroundings ina boundary layer wind tunnel toquantitatively measure the wind conditions for pedestrians atimportant locations around thesite. This model will beconstructed based ona3D digital model provided by the applicant. As required by the City of Emeryville, data describing the speed, direction and frequency of occurrence of wind gathered at Metropolitan Oakland International Airport for daylight hours between 7am and 6pm from 1984 to2014 will be used for this study.

A proximity model oftheexistingbuildings andrelevant surroundings will be modelled at ascaleas selected by the team. The buildings immediately surrounding the study site will be modeled in more detail than buildings beyond this radius. The model will incorporate relevant topographic changes as applicable. Surroundings beyond the limits oftheproximity model will beappropriately simulated by spires androughness blocks situatedonthe windtunnel floor upwind ofthestudy model. This will provide an accurate representation ofthe wind speed and turbulence profiles of wind approaching the study model.

To conduct the tests, a scale model ofthe proposed development will beconstructed toinclude all surface details measuring greater than2ft atfull scale. Withinputfrom team, windspeedsensors will be placed at various test point locations taking into consideration outdoor pedestrian- use areas around and ontheproposed development. These sensors measure the mean and gust wind velocities at a full-scale height of 5 ft above ground. Attention will be paid to wind sensitive areas such as the entranceways and public seatingareas, buildingcorners, andany other pedestrian-accessible areas around andonthe development.

The use of existing and proposed trees will be discussed with the team prior tocommencing the modeling for testing.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 26 The test model together withtheproximity model will betested inour boundary layer windtunnel where the natural wind speed and turbulence levels will be simulated. During thetests, wind speed data will be collected for 36 equally spaced wind directions.

Three configurations ofthe study site and surroundings will betested for our base study:

Existing: The existing surroundings, with any buildings currently on site, without the proposed development.

Existing plus Proposed (B1 & B8): Theproposed building option, along withexisting surrounding structures.

Existing plus Proposed (B1 & B8) and Cumulative: The proposed building option, along with existing surrounding structures and any know future Cumulative buildings.

The wind tunnel data will be analyzed together with thearea’s long-term meteorological statistics to predict how often selected wind speed ranges will occur at each location. Results will beassessed against RWDI’s pedestrian windcomfort and hazard criteria, as defined inthe City planning code.

In the event that undesirable conditions are found, we would use our experience and judgement to suggest design concepts to minimize uncomfortable winds. If conditions are particularly severe in critical areas, we may recommend additional testing todevelop specific solutions. Additional testing in connection withdetailedsolution development has not been included withinthescope ofthis proposal.

RWDI will contact you as soon as preliminary results are available toarrange a conference call todiscuss our findings. A presentation- style report describing methodology, results and recommendations will be prepared upon completion ofthe study.

Exhaust Dispersion & Design3
Assessment of potential for undesirable air quality impacts at buildingair intakes, windows, and sensitive outdoor spaces.

Design Charrette
A senior representative of RWDI will review the site and surrounding context and gather information on exhausts and intakes that may impact (or may beimpacted by) the proposed project.

Review anticipated windflow patterns givenpredominant winddirectionality.

Participate ina web-based design charrette torelay the thoughts from RWDI’s design review and provide high level guidance on design and mitigative measures. 3 Because this project includes a hospital, the building will exhaust chemicals and other contaminants. The study will evaluate these emissions along with the building’ s mechanical systems— including stacks, air intakes, exhausts, and generators— to inform the optimal design of stack heights and the placement of intakes and exhausts. The goal is to minimize re-entrainment and ensure safe and efficient air quality management. RWDI can also help determine appropriate turndown rates to support energy savings. For healthcare, labs, and research buildings, they strongly recommend the exhaust dispersion studies as industry best practice.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 27 Wind Tunnel Modeling
Windtunnel testing for exhaust dispersion of upto5exhaust sources and12 receptor locations.

Windtunnel testing scope andfeeassumes Building 1 is built as Option B (housing). If Option A MOB) is chosen, additional sources andreceptors will need tobeadded andthefee will need to beadjusted.

One (1) Test Configuration of Surroundings (Proposed).

Detailed statistical meteorological assessment todetermine the combination and frequency of wind speed and directionality which would cause undesirable reentrainment (I.e., dilution levels below asuggested health/odor target).

Testing of Mitigationconcepts included (stack height, exhaust parameters, control equipment relocationof exhaust sources or receptor locations, etc.), if required.

Shadow
Prevision Design will develop graphical shadow representations that depict existingvs. net new project shadow demonstrating whichareas net new shadow from theproject would affect. Toreflectthesolar extremes and midpoints, diagrams shall be prepared depicting thefollowing days: Spring Equinox March 21st), Summer Solstice (June 21st), Fall Equinox (September 21st), and Winter Solstice December 21st) and depict the location where shadows fall at 9am, 12pm, and 3pm.

Shadow Study Memo
Prevision will prepare ashort, writtensummary including thefollowing:
3D modelling assumptions
Shadow Analysis Methodology and Results
Annual Shadow Effects Characterization
Project Shadow Diagrams
TASK 2D. CEQA REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS
Urban Planning Partners will prepare the appropriate conclusions tofulfill CEQA requirements by providing an assessment of several mandatory impact categories, including:

Growth-inducingimpacts;
Significant unavoidable environmental impacts; and
Significant irreversible environmental changes.

TASK 2E. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The Urban Planning Partners team will identify andevaluateuptothreealternatives totheproject, one of which will bethe CEQA-required No Project Alternative. Thealternatives will bedeveloped in consultation with City staff. The alternatives will be based in part on the significant impacts ofthe project that are identified during the technical analysis phase ofthe Draft EIR process.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 28 Accordingtothe CEQA Guidelines, alternatives can beevaluated inless detail thantheproject, and therefore we propose that the alternatives analysis in the EIR beundertaken at a qualitative level. The discussion will beof sufficient detail toevaluate thebenefits and drawbacks of each alternative and to provide some qualitative conclusions regarding thealternatives. Based on this analysis, the Environmentally Superior Alternative will beidentified (as required by CEQA).

TASK 2F. PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR

1. Administrative Draft EIR
The information developed in Tasks 2A through 2E will be organized into an administrative Draft EIR.

The EIR is expected toinclude the following components:

Introduction
Summary
Project Description
Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
Effects Foundnottobe Significant or Less than Significant CEQA-Required Assessments and Conclusions
Alternatives totheproject
Report Preparation and References
Technical Appendices (as needed)
Urban Planning Partners will review recent environmental documents (complete and/or in process) to make certain that approaches, assumptions, methodologies and impact conclusions for the project are consistent with other environmental documents. Where appropriate, Urban Planning Partners will coordinate anddiscuss such withsubconsultants working ontheproject.

Urban Planning Partners will prepare one (1) electronic copy ofthe administrative Draft EIR and submit tothe City for review and comment. We will accommodate ongoing dialogue with thecity between completion ofthe administrative Draft EIR and the screencheck Draft EIR. If desired, we could include a second administrative draft as anoptional task andutilizethecontingency fee.

2. Screencheck Draft EIR
Upon receipt ofthe City comments ontheadministrative draft, Urban Planning Partners will prepare a screencheck draft. A redline version ofthe draft will be provided, showing the explicit changes made.

Urban Planning Partners will provide one (1) electronic copy ofthescreencheck draftfor review and comment.

3. Public Review Draft EIR
Urban Planning Partners will make any necessary revisions tothescreencheck draft andprepare the Draft EIR for publication. We will provide ten (10) hardcopies andone (1) electronic copy, plus all appendices tothe City for distribution. The electronic copy will beprovided inthree (3) formats including:

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 29 1) editableelectronic formatin MS Word; 2) high-resolution PDF for publication purposes (with searchable text); and 3) low-resolution PDFs broken into chapters/ sections not exceeding 25 MB for publication onthe City’s website (with searchable text). Urban Planning Partners will submit the Notice of Authorization (NOA) tothe State Clearinghouse.

Urban Planning Partners will maintain all materials referenced intheenvironmental document and promptly provide such materials tothe City upon request.

TASK 2G. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND FINDINGS Urban Planning Partners will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for this project and will identify responsibility for implementing and monitoring each mitigation measure, along with monitoringtriggers and reportingfrequency. Werecommend submitting thefirst draft ofthe MMRP tothe City for review with the screencheck Draft EIR, including a draft ofthe MMRP with circulation ofthe Draft EIR (though not required). Urban Planning Partners will prepare the CEQA findings, and if necessary, a Statement of Overriding Considerations.

TASK 2H. DRAFT EIR HEARINGS
Urban Planning Partners will attenduptotwo (2) public hearings onthe Draft EIR; thepurposeofthese hearings is toprovidethe Planning Commission, City Council, andthepublic anopportunity tocomment on the Draft EIR. Urban Planning Partners will be available toanswer questions. Fehr & Peers has included attendance for up totwo (2) public hearings as well.

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT/ FINAL EIR
TASK 3A. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT

1. Administrative Draft Response to Comments Document
Urban Planning Partners will prepare the Response to Comments (RTC) document ontheproject following thepublic review period.

Immediately following the completion ofthe 45-day public review period, Urban Planning Partners will meet with City staff todiscuss any comments received during thepublic review period, and the approach toundertake in responding tothecomments. Urban Planning Partners will incorporate public and/or agency comments receivedonthe Draft EIR, andresponses tothese comments, intoone (1) final document for publication and distribution. One (1) electronic copy will beprovided tothe City for review and comment.

Our budget estimate in Table 3 shows the level of professional effort assumed for this task. Should an unexpectedly largevolumeof comments besubmitted (e.g., anorganized letter-writingcampaignby Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 30 project opposition or asubstantial package of comments by alaw firm representing labor union interests), an adjustment inthebudget tocover work beyond the assumed level would be needed.

2. Screencheck Draft Response to Comments Document
Upon receipt ofthe City comments onthefinal administrative draft, Urban Planning Partners will consolidate andreconcile comments andprepare ascreencheck draft. A redline versionofthedraft will be provided, showing the explicit changes made. Urban Planning Partners will provide one (1) electronic copy ofthe screencheck draft for review and comment.

3. Final Response to Comments Document
Urban Planning Partners will make any necessary revisions tothescreencheck draft andprepare the Final RTC Document for publication. We will provide ten (10) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy, including all appendices tothe City for distribution.

TASK 3B. EIR CERTIFICATION HEARINGS
Urban Planning Partners will attenduptothree (3) public meetings onthe RTC Document/Final EIR and will beavailable torespondtoquestions as necessary. Additional meetings and/or hearings can be attended upon request onatime-and-materials basis.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS

STAFF AND PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS
Lynette and Carla will beavailable toattend working sessions with City staff andtheproject team. Carla will coordinate the day-to-day activities associated with theproject with support from theassigned Project Planner. Project management tasks include regular client contact; contract management; assistance toteam members; schedule coordination; and development of products.

Our feeestimate (see Table 3) provides for Urban Planning Partners’ attendance at upto15 meetings in addition tothe project kick-off meeting. This will allow for 1 to2 meetings per month. Carla will attend each meeting, and Lynette will attend uptoten (10) meetings (including any with Sutter Health).

Meetings will include the following:

Meeting toreview Project Scope (after review/comment ondraft scope of work) Meeting after Planning Commission Scoping Session
Meeting for each round of comments on administrative and screencheck drafts ofthe EIR (total of two)
Meeting after Planning Commission Draft EIR hearing
Meeting for each round of comments on administrative and screencheck drafts ofthe Final EIR (total oftwo)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 31 Fehr & Peers will attenduptoten (10) stafflevel conference calls with City staff, consultants, andothers inconjunction with the transportation analysis. RWDI will attend up tothree (3) conference calls to review and discuss the results ofthe wind analysis. HELIX will attend up tofour (4) conference calls and Baseline will attend up totwo (2) conference calls. Additional meetings and/or hearings can be attended upon request onatime-and-materials basis.

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Urban Planning Partners will compile and organize the EIR portion ofthe Administrative Record. The record will include all referenced technical reports and will betransmitted tothecity in a format consistent with the City’s standard for Administrative Records. The record will bekept current and be provided tothecity at key milestones.

GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Urban Planning Partners will undertake a variety of general project management tasks throughout the EIR preparation period. Carla, with assistance from Lynette, will provide input on scope, budget, contract negotiation and management, scheduling ofthe project, and quality assurance for all work conducted.

Carla will leadday-to-day activities associated withtheproject, including regular contact withthecity, as necessary. Carla will also provide direction toall team members toensure an internally consistent and coherent document. Lynette will review all documents prior tosubmittal tothe city. Lynette and Carla will be available for consultation on CEQA procedural matters as well as application ofthe CEQA Guidelines tothis project. Inaddition topreparationofthe NOP, Urban Planning Partners will alsobe responsible for the recordation ofthe Notice of Availability (NOA) ofthe environmental document and the Notice of Determination (NOD).

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 32 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 33 3 . T I M E L I N E
The estimated timeline for completing an EIR for the Sutter Health Medical Center project based onthe scope of work detailed in Section 3 is shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2 PROPOSED TIMELINE
Milest one
Responsible
Part y
Weeks t o
Complet e
Cumulat ive
Weeks
Authorization to Proceed City ----
Prepare Draft Project Description UPP Team 2 2
Prepare Transportation Study Assumptions Memo Fehr & Peers 8 10 Prepare Administrative Draft EIR UPP Team 26 36
Review of Administrative Draft EIR City 3 39
Prepare Screencheck Draft EIR UPP Team 3.5 42.5
Review Screencheck Draft EIR City 2 44.5
Prepare Public Review Draft EIR UPP Team 1 45.5
Public Review Period -- 6.5 52
Prepare Administrative Draft RTC UPP Team 3 55
Review of Administrative Draft RTC City 3 58
Prepare Screencheck Draft RTC UPP Team 2 60
Review Screencheck Draft RTC City 2 62
Final RTC UPP Team 1 63
Earliest timeline for FEIR adoption City -- 63 weeks
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 34 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 35 4 . E S T I M AT E D F E E
Our estimated feetocompletethe EIR scope of work outlinedinthis proposal is $1,677,208. A detailed breakdown ofthe estimated fee is provided in Table 3.

We also recommend including a 25 percent contingency, tobe used only with prior client authorization, bringing thetotal estimated fee to $2,096,509. Inaddition, there is one optional task totaling $318,038.

All work will beperformed onatime-and-materials basis, nottoexceed thetotal budget without written authorization from theclient.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 P R O P O S A L F O R S E R V I C E S M A Y 2 0 2 5

S U T T E R H E A L T H M E D I C A L C E N T E R P R O J E C T E I R 36 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Table 3 Preliminary Fee Estimate
Ly
n
e
t
t
e
D
i
a
s
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
i
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
Ca
r
l
a
V
i
o
l
e
t
Pro
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Pro
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
Gr a
p
h
i
c
s
Wo
r
d
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
Pa
t
r
i
c
k
S
u
t
t
o
n
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Ce
m
A
t
a
b
e
k
Se
n
i
o
r
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Yil i
n
T
i
a
n
Pro
j
e
c
t
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Joh
n
a
t
h
a
n
R
i
z
z
o
M
o
s
b
a
u
g
h
Sta
f
f
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Sc
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
Ro
b
R
e
e
s
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
i
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
Sa
m
T
a
b
i
b
n
i
a
Pro
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Te
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
E
x
p
e
r
t
Jord
a
n
B
r
o
o
k
s
Se
n
i
o
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Pla
n
n
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
I
I
Pla
n
n
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
I
I
Gr a
p
h
i
c
s
Ad
m
i
n
Hourly Rate:$ 330 $ 250 $ 155 $ 150 $ 230 $ 215 $ 185 $ 160 $ 395 $ 330 $ 270 $ 240 $ 195 $ 185 $ 180 $ 165 PHASE 1. Project Initiation
Task 1A: Project Initiation

1. Kick Off Meeting/Site Visit 4 4 4 1 3,090$ 2 2 2 2 1,580$ 4,670$

2. Data Gathering and Evaluation 8 6 1 3,080$ 2 2 2 2 1,580$ 4 8 16 32 4 8 16,020$ 20,680$

3. Base Map Preparation 2 4 6 2,020$ 2,020$

4. Project Description 4 14 12 10 8,180$ 8,180$
Subtotal for Task 1A 8 28 26 18 16,370$ 4 4 4 4 3,160$ 4 8 16 32 4 8 16,020$ 35,550$ Task 1B: Notice of Preparation
Subtotal for Task 1B 1 4 6 2 2,560$ 2,560$
Task 1C: Scoping Meeting
Subtotal for Task 1C 6 6 4 4,100$ 4,100$
Task 1D: Review of NOP Comments/ Work Program Refinement Subtotal for Task 1D 2 4 4 6 3,180$ 3,180$
hours 17 42 40 26 4 4 4 4 4 8 - 16 - 32 4 8
5,610 10,500 6,200 3,900 26,210$ 920 860 740 640 3,160$ 1,580 2,640 - 3,840 - 5,920 720 1,320 16,020$ -$ -$ 45,390$ PHASE 2. DRAFT EIR
Task 2A. Effects Found to be Less Than Significant

1. Agriculture and Forest Resources 1 1 283$ 283$

2. Mineral Resources 1 2 560$ 560$

3. Wildfire 1 1 405$ 405$
Subtotal for Task 2A 3 4 1,248$ 1,248$
Task 2B. Plans and Policies
Subtotal for Task 2B 2 6 16 8 5,840$ 5,840$
Task 2C. Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

1. Land Use 2 10 12 6 5,920$ 5,920$

2. Transportation 8 20 8 6 9,780$ 35 130 128 494 604 2,378 4 473 846, 320$ 856, 100$

3. Air Quality 8 8 4,640$ 6 50 10,630$ 15,270$

4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8 8 4,640$ 2 30 6,010$ 10, 650$

5. Energy 1 2 830$ 2 20 4,160$ 4,990$

6. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources 1 4 1,330$ 21, 830$ 23, 160$

7. Geology and Soils 1 2 830$ 2 6 36 7,510$ 8,340$

8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 8 8 4,640$ 6 60 10 15, 880$ 20, 520$

9. Hydrology and Water Quality 1 2 830$ 2 6 36 7,510$ 8,340$

10. Noise and Vibration 1 4 1,330$ 4 8 40 8,800$ 10, 130$

11. Population and Housing 1 4 8 4 3,170$ 3,170$

12. Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities 4 12 44 24 14, 740$ 14, 740$

13. Biological Resources 1 6 8 4 3,670$ 11,000$ 19,670$

14. 2 8 12 8 5,720$ 85, 500$ 21, 600$ 112, 820$
Subtotal for Task 2C 47 98 92 52 62, 070$ 24 72 108 122 60, 500$ 35 130 128 494 604 2,378 4 473 846, 320$ 85, 500$ 21, 600$ 32, 830$ 1,113, 820$ Task 2D. CEQA Required Assessment Conclusions
Subtotal for Task 2D 1 6 8 2 3,370$ 3,370$
Task 2E. Alternatives Analysis
Subtotal for Task 2E 8 36 12 16 15, 900$ 2 2 8 2 2,950$ 18, 850$ Task 2F. Preparation of EIR

1. Admin Draft 8 16 12 16 10,900$ 5 5 5 5 3,950$ 8 16 24 100 10 18 37,470$ 6,840$ 59,160$

2. Screencheck 12 32 32 16 19, 320$ 2 2 2 2 1,580$ 2 8 10 24 2 8 11, 950$ 2,000$ 34, 850$

3. Public Review Draft EIR 4 16 24 16 11,440$ 1 1 1 1 790$ 4 6 8 2 4,570$ 16,800$ Subtotal for Task 2F 24 64 68 48 41,660$ 8 8 8 8 6,320$ 10 28 40 132 12 28 53,990$ 8,840$ 110,810$ Task 2G. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Findings Subtotal for Task 2G 4 8 10 6 5,770$ 2 2 2 8 2 3,490$ 9,260$ Fe
h
r
P
e
e
r
s
T
o
t
a
l
Fehr & Peers
Te
a
m
T
o
t
a
l
Ur b
a
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
Pre
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
T
o
t
a
l
PreVision
Design
RW
D
I
T
o
t
a
l

RWDI HELIX
HE
L
I
X
T
o
t
a
l
Urban Planning Partners Baseline Environmental Consulting Bas
e
l
i
n
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
PHASE 1. PROJECT INITIATION SUBTOTAL
Aesthetics Wind, Shade, and Shadow)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Table 3 Preliminary Fee Estimate
Ly
n
e
t
t
e
D
i
a
s
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
i
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
Ca
r
l
a
V
i
o
l
e
t
Pro
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Pro
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
Gr a
p
h
i
c
s
Wo
r
d
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
Pa
t
r
i
c
k
S
u
t
t
o
n
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Ce
m
A
t
a
b
e
k
Se
n
i
o
r
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Yil i
n
T
i
a
n
Pro
j
e
c
t
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Joh
n
a
t
h
a
n
R
i
z
z
o
M
o
s
b
a
u
g
h
Sta
f
f
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Sc
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
Ro
b
R
e
e
s
Pri n
c
i
p
a
l
i
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
Sa
m
T
a
b
i
b
n
i
a
Pro
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Te
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
E
x
p
e
r
t
Jord
a
n
B
r
o
o
k
s
Se
n
i
o
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Pla
n
n
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
I
I
Pla
n
n
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
I
I
Gr a
p
h
i
c
s
Ad
m
i
n
Hourly Rate:$ 330 $ 250 $ 155 $ 150 $ 230 $ 215 $ 185 $ 160 $ 395 $ 330 $ 270 $ 240 $ 195 $ 185 $ 180 $ 165 Fe h
r
P
e
e
r
s
T
o
t
a
l
Fehr & Peers
Te
a
m
T
o
t
a
l
Ur b
a
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
Pre
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
T
o
t
a
l
PreVision
Design
RW
D
I
T
o
t
a
l

RWDI HELIX
HE
L
I
X
T
o
t
a
l
Urban Planning Partners Baseline Environmental Consulting Bas
e
l
i
n
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
Task 2H. Draft EIR Hearings
Subtotal for Task 2H 8 10 4 5,760$ 4 1,320$ 7,080$
hours 94 231 214 132 32 80 116 130 45 166 130 538 604 2,526 16 505 31,020 57,628 33,170 19,800 141,618$ 7,360 17,200 21,460 20,800 66,820$ 17,775$ 54,780$ 35,100$ 129,120$ 117,780$ 467,310$ 2,880$ 83,325$ 908,070$ 85,500$ 21,600$ 41,670$ 1,270,278$ PHASE 3. Response to Comments Document/ Final EIR
Task 3A. Response to Comments Document

1. Admin Draft RTC 12 32 40 24 21, 760$ 6 10 10 10 6,980$ 2 6 8 2 2 5,390$ 34, 130$

2. Screencheck Draft RTC 6 16 24 16 12,100$ 1 1 1 1 790$ 12,890$

3. Final RTC 4 8 12 12 6,980$ 1 1 1 1 790$ 7,770$
Subtotal for Task 3A 22 56 76 52 40,840$ 8 12 12 12 8,560$ 2 6 8 2 2 4,690$ 54,090$ Task 3B. EIR Certification Hearings
Subtotal for Task 3B 12 20 4 9,580$ 4 1,320$ 10, 900$
hours 34 76 80 52 8 12 12 12 2 10 8 2 2
11, 220 19, 000 12, 400 7,800 50, 420$ 1,840 2,580 2,220 1,920 8,560$ 790 3,300 1,920 370 330 6,710$ 65, 690$ ON-GOING. Project Management and Meetings
Staff/ Project Team Meetings
Subtotal 24 50 24 24, 140$ 2 12 20 6 10, 540$ 2,250$ 36, 930$ EIR Administrative Record
Subtotal 2 4 36 16 9,640$ 9,640$
General Project Management
Subtotal 16 50 18 20, 570$ 20, 570$
hours 42 104 78 16 2 12 20 6
13, 860 26, 000 12, 090 2,400 54, 350$ 790 3,960 4,800 990 10, 540$ 2,250$ 67, 140$

TOTAL EIR LABOR ESTIMATE
hours 187 453 412 226 272, 598$ 44 96 132 146 78, 540$ 53 196 130 582 604 2560 20 521 941, 340$ 21, 600$ 50,490$ 94,128$ 51,460$ 26,100$ 272,598$ 10,120$ 20,640$ 24,420$ 23,360$ 78,540$ 20,935$ 64,680$ 35,100$ 139,680$ 117,780$ 473,600$ 3,600$ 85,965$ 941,340$ 85,500$ 21,600$ 43,920$ 1,448,498$ 61,710 113,128 63,860 20,640 24,420 20,935

DIRECT COSTS

1. Misc. Direct Costs 1,500$ 89,200$ 90,700$

2. Printing 12, 000$ 12, 000$

3. Subconsultant Mark-up 126,010$ 126,010$
139,510$ 89,200$ 228,710$

TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE
412,108$ 78,540$ 1,030,540$ 85,500$ 21,600$ 43,920$ 1,677,208$

RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES
25% Contingency ( May only be used as authorized by client) 419, 302$ TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE WITH CONTINGENCY 2,096,509$

OPTIONAL TASKS

1. Optional Saturday Analysis (Labor) 8 24 36 160 200 720 0 145 255, 325$ 255, 325$

2. Optional Saturday Analysis ( Other Direct Expenses) 33,800$ 33,800$ 3 Subconsultant Mark-up 28, 913$ 28, 913$
Total Optional Tasks 28,913$ 289,125$ 318,038$
ONGOING. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS

SUBTOTAL
PHASE 3. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

DOCUMENT/ FINAL EIR
PHASE 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 URBANPLANNINGPARTNERSINC.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6B3940F4- D26A-47C0-B787-852265641BF0 Sutter Emeryville
Hospital Project
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Impacts on
Presented by 53" Street Residents
Brandon Soublet, Jennifer Ann Lee,
Baruch Golden
Contact:

[email protected]
JenniferLee4@ucsfiedu
[email protected]
Presented by 53rd Street Residents
BrandonSoublet,
[email protected]
Jennifer AnnLee
[email protected]
BaruchGolden
[email protected]

PRESENTED TO THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN COMMITTEE AT THEIR
JUNE 1, 2026 MEETING
Conclusion
Balancing Regional and Local Needs
The hospital is a major regional infrastructure that must coexist safely with a residential and school-oriented neighborhood.

Role of Bicycle & Pedestrian Commission
The Commission ensures active transportation safety is a core project requirement, advocating for safe infrastructure and enforcement.

Community Safety Prioritization
Early intervention on 53rd Street can prevent conflicts, injuries, and neighborhood degradation, promoting walkability and bike safety.

Leadership for Equitable Access
The Commission’s leadership can integrate large institutions into neighborhoods while preserving safety for residents and active travelers.

In conclusion, the proposed Sutter Health Emeryville Hospital represents a significant regional investment with long-term implications for nearby neighborhoods. For residents of 53rd Street, the central issue is not whether the hospital should exist, but how it can coexist safely with a residential, school-oriented, bicycle- and pedestrianrich environment. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission is uniquely positioned to elevate these concerns and ensure that active transportation safety is treated as a core project requirement rather than an afterthought. By recommending strong circulation controls, protected infrastructure, and enforceable safety mitigations, the Commission can help the City balance regional healthcare needs with local quality of life. Early, thoughtful intervention can prevent years of avoidable conflicts, injuries, and neighborhood degradation. Residents respectfully ask the Commission to recognize 53rd Street as a high-priority safety corridor and to advocate for solutions that align with Emeryville’s broader goals for walkability, bicycle safety, and equitable access. With the Commission’s leadership, this project can become an example of how large institutions can be integrated into urban neighborhoods without sacrificing the safety of those who live, walk, bike, and attend school nearby.

Requested Mitigations and
Design Recommendations
Traffic Mitigation Strategies
Propose prohibiting 53rd Street as a primary hospital route and use modal filters to reduce through traffic while allowing emergency access.

Bicycle Infrastructure Enhancement
Preserve and enhance protected bicycle lanes with
continuous, low-stress connections to parks and regional trails for safer cycling.

School Zone Safety Improvements
Implement raised crosswalks, speed tables, and daylighted intersections to improve safety during peak pedestrian
activity periods.

Community Oversight and Analysis
Request independent traffic and safety analyses and
establish a neighborhood advisory group for ongoing
monitoring and adjustments.

We ask the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission to recommend a set of targeted, enforceable mitigation measures focused on safety and prevention. Key recommendations include protecting 53rd Street as a low-traffic neighborhood corridor by prohibiting its use as a primary hospital access route and considering modal filters or partial closures that allow bicycles, pedestrians, and emergency vehicles while discouraging through traffic. Residents also request the preservation and enhancement of protected bicycle infrastructure, including continuous, lowstress connections to parks and regional trails. School-zone safety improvements such as raised crosswalks, speed tables, and daylighted intersections are recommended to address peak-period pedestrian activity. Additional measures include routing hospital traffic to appropriate arterial streets, strengthening intersection design with protected intersections and reduced turning radii, and implementing residential parking permit programs to reduce circulation impacts. Importantly, residents request independent, peer-reviewed traffic and safety analyses to validate assumptions in developer-funded studies. Finally, establishing an ongoing neighborhood advisory or monitoring group would allow the City to track real-world conditions after project implementation and make adjustments as needed.

Key Bicycle and Pedestrian
Safety Concerns
Traffic Volume and Behavior
Increased hospital traffic may change driver behavior, increase speeds, and cause more turning conflicts on 53rd Street.

Bicycle Infrastructure Concerns
Uncertainty around preserving and reconfiguring bike lanes affects the safety and connectivity for cyclists.

Curbside Conflicts and Rideshare
Rideshare, patient drop-offs, and deliveries increase curbside conflicts, posing risks to pedestrians and cyclists.

Emergency Access and Parking Spillover
Emergency vehicles, shuttles, ride share activity, and parking overflow may elevate risks by increasing traffic unpredictability and circulation.

Residents have identified several interrelated concerns regarding how the proposed hospital could affect bicycle and pedestrian safety on 53rd Street. A primary concern is the potential for 53rd Street to become an informal access route or spillover corridor for hospital-related traffic. Even modest increases in daily vehicle volumes can substantially change driver behavior, increase speeds, and create more turning conflicts at intersections. There are also unresolved questions about the preservation or reconfiguration of existing bicycle infrastructure, including the continuity and protection of cycle facilities connecting to Parks and the Bay Trail. Increased rideshare activity, patient drop-offs, and delivery vehicles introduce additional curbside conflicts that disproportionately affect people walking and biking. Emergency vehicle access, while essential, can also increase risk through speed, noise, and unpredictability, particularly if routes are not carefully separated from school zones and residential blocks. Finally, parking spillover from a 24/7 hospital operation may lead to increased vehicle circulation as drivers search for free street parking, further increasing exposure risk for vulnerable road users. Taken together, these concerns suggest that without proactive planning, the project could unintentionally erode the safety and comfort of a corridor that currently serves as a neighborhood asset.

Pedestrian Conditions on
Traffic and Parking Challenges
* Existing congestion and unrestricted parking create circulation challenges, raising safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists.

High Pedestrian Activity
* 53rd Street serves the Emeryville Child Development Center Preschool and the Anna Yates K-8 Elementary School with high vehicular and pedestrian traffic during peak AM drop-off and PM pick-up times.

Residential Street Characteristics
Hosting two speed bumps, a stop sign, and a turn around within one city block, 53rd Street is primarily residential and not designed for heavy regional traffic, emphasizing local neighborhood use and safety. is a Bike Blvd
Bicycle Network Connectivity
* 53rd Street provides important east-west bicycle connectivity, linking residential areas to parks and trails.
53rd Street currently functions as a neighborhood-serving street with characteristics that make it especially sensitive to changes in traffic patterns. The corridor serves a K-8 school and a child development center, resulting in concentrated pedestrian activity during morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up periods. Families with young children regularly serve as a neighborhood street, due to nearby intersections at times when even small increases in vehicle volumes can significantly elevate collision risk. The street is residential and not designed or intended to function as a regional arterial. It also plays an important role in Emeryville’s bicycle network, providing east-west connectivity and linking residential areas to parks, trails, and other destinations. Existing congestion already occurs during school peak periods, and residents report that traffic conditions can feel chaotic even under current volumes.

Parking along and near 53rd Street is largely unrestricted, which further contributes to circulation as drivers search for spaces. These baseline conditions mean that any additional traffic associated with hospital operations—whether from employees, patients, visitors, deliveries, or emergency services—would be layered onto a corridor that is already operating near its comfort and safety limits for pedestrians and cyclists. Understanding and respecting these existing conditions is essential when evaluating project impacts and designing mitigation measures.

Overview Anna Yates
Elementary School K-8 Purpose
* Toinform the commission about existing 53" Street
neighborhood conditions potential hospital impact on
bicycle and pedestrian safety.

Balancing Healthcare and Livability
* 53" Street residents request responsible integration of the hospital infrastructure into and existing residential area.

Traffic and Safety Challenges
* Concerns include increased traffic, emergency vehicles, parking issues, and conflicts with vulnerable road users and populations.

Request for Mitigation Measures
* 53! Street residents request a through traffic analysis to recommend design changes and safety investments
aligned with Emeryville’s transportation active plan and Vision Zero principles.

This presentation summarizes residents’ concerns about the proposed Sutter Health Emeryville Hospital project on 53rd Street. 53"? Street residents seek to inform the Emeryville Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission of existing neighborhood conditions, identify potential impacts of the hospital project on bicycle and pedestrian safety, and request specific, enforceable mitigation measures. Residents recognize the importance of expanding regional healthcare access and understand that the hospital project is likely to proceed.

Accordingly, 53 Street residents request responsible integration of a large, 24-hour medical facility into a sensitive residential context. The focus is on preserving safety, accessibility, and livability for people who walk, bike, attend school, and live along 53rd Street. The neighborhood includes families, children, seniors, and daily bicycle commuters, all of whom rely on 53rd Street as a low-stress, local corridor. The scale and operational intensity of the proposed hospital—described in public materials as a regional medical center rather than a small clinic—raise legitimate concerns about traffic volumes, emergency vehicle activity, parking spillover, and conflicts between vehicles and vulnerable road users.

This proposal asks the Commission to apply its expertise and advisory authority to recommend design changes, circulation controls, and safety investments that align with Emeryville’s adopted active transportation and Vision Zero goals. By addressing these issues early in the planning and environmental review process, the City can avoid preventable safety problems and ensure that regional infrastructure investments do not undermine neighborhood-scale mobility. between San Pablo and Hollis
Aikido Institute oO
% Ze
Emeryville Child
Development Center
Ce) Head Over Heels
Athletic Arts Seve pain Df
Overview of existing conditions on 53rd Street
Sutter Emeryville Hospital
Project
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Impacts
on
Presented by 53" Street Residents Brandon
Soublet, Jennifer AnnLee, Baruch Golden
Overview of Existing Conditions on 53rd Street, Key Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Concerns, Requested Mitigations and Design Recommendations, Conclusion Sutter Emeryville Project
Older Adult Considerations
Presented by 53 Street Residents:

Brandon Soublet, Jennifer Ann Lee
Baruch Golden
Purpose
To inform the commission
about potential Sutter
Hospital project impacts on
older adult and vulnerable
populations.

O/ 1U/Z0
PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION ON AGING AT THEIR JUNE 10, 2026 MEETING O/1U/20
Important Age-Friendly Considerations
¢ Mobility
limitations
° Transit reliance
° Noise sensitivity
° Higher fall risk
¢ Need for rest
areas
Multi-Year Construction Impacts on Residents
¢ Noise
° Dust and pollutants
e Street detours
° Residents request
advance communication
° Residents request
community liaison
6/10/26
Public Safety
A public safety
assessment is needed
to understand and
address public safety
impacts, including
public safety
challenges, adequate
staffing, and response
times.

Noise Impacts
* Construction
e Ambulance
sirens
° Helicopters
6/10/26
Traffic Safety
¢ Safer crossings
° Longer signals
¢ Reduced speeds
Restroom Access
° Public restrooms
¢ ADA compliant
° Near transit stops
° Clearly marked
Bus Stops
solar panels ¢ Benches at stops signage
e Shade & shelter
° Age-friendly
design
) bike rack
9 Sidewalk Safety
¢ Audit sidewalks
° Fix hazards
¢ Improve crossings
° Provide ongoing
maintenance
10 6/10/20
Transit System Impacts
° Increased ridership
¢ More frequency
° Direct routes
¢ Monitor demand
11 Equity & Accessibility Enhancements
° Wayfinding
° Lighting
° Shade & cooling
° Accessible drop-offs
° Language access
12 6/10/26
Requested Actions
° Age-Friendly Assessment
* Construction Mitigation
* Noise Mitigation
¢ Public Safety Assessment
¢ Pedestrian Upgrades
* Transit improvements
* Community engagement
13 Contact
534 Street Residents
Baruch Golden
[email protected]
Brandon Soublet
[email protected]
Jennifer Ann Lee
jennifer.lee4 @ucsf.edu
510-282-1675
14 Sutter Emeryville Hospital Project
53 Street Impacts
Overview of Existing Conditions on 53rd Street
Key Safety Concerns
Requested Mitigations
Design Recommendations
Presented by 53 Street Residents
Brandon Soublet
Jennifer Ann Lee
Baruch Golden
w
Emeryville Child
Development Center
Pedestrian Bridge
Ea
Emeryville Center for
Community Life
Yates @
53° Street School Zone between Hollis and San Pablo
sath S
53 agin :

Overview of Existing Conditions on 53rd Street, Key Safety Concerns, Requested Mitigations, and Design Recommendations
Overview Anna Yates
Purpose Elementary School K-8
¢ To inform the commission about existing 53 Street
neighborhood conditions potential hospital safety impacts.

Balancing Healthcare and Livability
° 53' Street residents request responsible integration of the hospital infrastructure into and existing residential area.

Traffic and Safety Challenges * Concerns include increased traffic, emergency vehicles, parking issues, and conflicts with vulnerable road users and populations.

Request for Mitigation Measures
° 539 Street residents request a through traffic analysis to recommend design changes and safety investments aligned with Emeryville’s active transportation plan and Vision Zero principles.

This presentation summarizes residents’ concerns about the proposed Sutter Health Emeryville Hospital project on 53rd Street. 53" Street residents seek to inform the Emeryville Commissions of existing neighborhood conditions, identify potential impacts of the hospital Project on safety, and request specific, enforceable mitigation measures. Residents recognize the importance of expanding regional healthcare access and understand that the hospital Project is likely to proceed.

Accordingly, 53 Street residents request responsible integration of a large, 24-hour medical facility into a sensitive residential context. The focus is on preserving safety, accessibility, and livability for people who walk, bike, attend school, live, and recreate along 53rd Street. The neighborhood includes families, children, seniors, and daily bicycle commuters, all of whom rely on 53rd Street asa low-stress, local corridor. The scale and operational intensity of the Proposed hospital—described in public materials as a regional medical center rather than a small clinic—raise legitimate concerns about traffic volumes, emergency vehicle activity, parking spillover, and conflicts between vehicles and vulnerable road users.

This proposal asks the Commission to apply its expertise and advisory authority to recommend design changes, circulation controls, parking permits, and safety investments that align with Emeryville’s adopted active transportation and Vision Zero goals. By addressing these issues early in the planning and environmental review process, the City can avoid preventable safety problems and ensure that regional infrastructure investments do not undermine neighborhood-scale mobility and livability.

Existing Conditions on 53rd Street
Traffic and Parking Challenges
° Existing congestion and unrestricted parking create circulation challenges, raising safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists.

Emeryville Child Development Center High Pedestrian Activity * 93rd Street serves Emeryville Child Development Center Preschool, Anna Yates K-8 Elementary School, Emeryville High School, Emeryville Center of Community Life with high vehicular and pedestrian traffic during peak AM drop-off and PM pick-up times.

Residential Street Characteristics
* Hosting three speed bumps, a stop sign, and a turn around within one city block, 53rd Street is primarily residential and not designed for heavy regional traffic, emphasizing local neighborhood use and Safety. o3rd Street is a Bike Blvd
Network Connectivity
° 58rd Street provides important east-west bicycle connectivity, linking residential areas to parks and trails. 53rd Street currently serves as a neighborhood street, making it especially sensitive to changes in traffic patterns. The corridor serves a Community Recreation Center, a high school, an elementary school, and a preschool, resulting in concentrated pedestrian activity during morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up periods. Families with young children regularly use neighborhood streets, especially at nearby intersections, where even small increases in vehicle volume significantly elevate collision risk. The street is residential and not designed or intended to function as a regional arterial. It also plays an important role in Emeryville’s network, providing east-west connectivity and linking residential areas to parks, trails, and other destinations. Existing congestion already occurs during school peak periods, and residents report that traffic conditions can feel chaotic even under current volumes. Parking along and near 53rd Street is la rgely unrestricted, which further contributes to circulation as drivers search for spaces. These baseline conditions mean that any additional traffic associated with hospital operations—whether from employees, patients, visitors, deliveries, or emergency services—would be layered onto a corridor that is already operating near its comfort and safety limits for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. Understanding and respecting these existing conditions is essential when evaluating project impacts and designing mitigation measures.

Key Safety Concerns
Traffic Volume and Behavior
Increased hospital traffic may change driver behavior, increase speeds, and cause more turning conflicts on 53rd Street.

Bicycle Infrastructure Concerns
Uncertainty around preserving and reconfiguring bike lanes affects the safety and connectivity for cyclists.

Curbside Conflicts and Rideshare
Rideshare, patient drop-offs, and deliveries increase curbside conflicts, posing risks to pedestrians and cyclists.

Emergency Access and Parking Spillover
Emergency vehicles, shuttles, ride share activity, and parking overflow may elevate risks by increasing traffic unpredictability and circulation.

Residents have identified several interrelated concerns regarding how the proposed hospital could affect bicycle and pedestrian safety on 53rd Street. A primary concern is the potential for 93rd Street to become an informal access route or spillover corridor for hospital-related traffic. Even modest increases in daily vehicle volumes can substantially change driver behavior, increase speeds, and create more turning conflicts at intersections. There are also unresolved questions about the preservation or reconfiguration of existing infrastructure, including the continuity and protection of bike and pedestrian connectivity to Parks and the Bay Trail.

Increased vehicular traffic, including rideshare and patient drop-offs, delivery vehicles, shuttles, and emergency vehicles, introduces additional curbside conflicts that disproportionately affect neighborhood residents as drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians. Emergency vehicle access, while essential, can also increase risk through speed, noise, and unpredictability, particularly if routes are not carefully separated from school zones and residential blocks. Finally, shuttle and parking spillover from a 24/7 hospital operation may lead to increased vehicle circulation as drivers search for free street parking, further increasing exposure risk for vulnerable road users. Taken together, these concerns suggest that without proactive planning, the project could unintentionally erode the safety and comfort of a corridor that currently serves as a neighborhood asset.

Requested Mitigations and Design Recommendations
Traffic Mitigation Strategies
Propose prohibiting 53rd Street as a primary hospital route and use modal filters to reduce through traffic while allowing emergency access.

Bicycle Infrastructure Enhancement
Preserve and enhance protected bicycle lanes with continuous, low-stress connections to parks and regional trails for safer cycling.

School Zone Safety Improvements
Implement raised crosswalks, speed tables, and daylighted intersections to improve Safety during peak pedestrian activity periods.

Community Oversight and Analysis
Request independent traffic and Safety analyses and establish a neighborhood advisory group for ongoing monitoring and adjustments.

We ask the Commission to recommend a set of targeted, enforceable mitigation measures focused on safety and prevention. Key recommendations include protecting 53rd Street as a low-traffic neighborhood corridor by prohibiting its use as a primary hospital access route and considering modal filters or partial closures that allow bicycles, pedestrians, and emergency vehicles while discouraging through traffic. Residents also request the preservation and enhancement of protected bicycle infrastructure, including continuous, low-stress connections to parks and regional trails. School-zone Safety improvements such as raised crosswalks, speed tables, and daylighted intersections are recommended to address peak- period pedestrian activity. Additional measures include routing hospital traffic to appropriate arterial streets, strengthening intersection design with protected intersections and reduced turning radii, and implementing residential parking permit programs to reduce circulation impacts. Importantly, residents request independent, peer-reviewed traffic and safety analyses to validate assumptions in developer-funded studies. Finally, establishing an ongoing neighborhood advisory or monitoring group would allow the City to track real-world conditions after project implementation and make adjustments as needed. 1301 53rd St Conclusion orc
Balancing Regional and Local Needs
The hospital is a major regional infrastructure that must coexist safely with a residential and school-oriented neighborhood.

Role of Commission
The Commission ensures Safety is a core project
requirement, advocating for safe infrastructure and enforcement to protect 53" Street and the greater Emeryville community.

Community Safety Prioritization
Early intervention on 53rd Street can prevent conflicts, injuries, and neighborhood degradation, promoting walkability and safety.

Leadership for Equitable Access
The Commission’s leadership can integrate large institutions into neighborhoods while preserving safety for residents and active travelers.

In conclusion, the proposed Sutter Health Emeryville Hospital represents a significant regional investment with long-term implications for nearby neighborhoods. For residents of 53rd Street, the central issue is not whether the hospital should exist, but how it can coexist safely with a residential, school-oriented, bicycle- and pedestrian-rich environment. The Commission is | uniquely positioned to elevate these concerns and ensure that active transportation safety is treated as a core project requirement rather than an afterthought. By recommending strong circulation controls, protected infrastructure, and enforceable safety mitigations, the Commission can help the City balance regional healthcare needs with local quality of life. Early, thoughtful intervention can prevent years of avoidable conflicts, injuries, and neighborhood degradation. Residents respectfully ask the Commission to recognize 53rd Street as a high-priority Safety corridor and to advocate for solutions that align with Emeryville’s broader goals for walkability, bicycle safety, and equitable access. With the Commission’s leadership, this project can become an example of how large institutions can be integrated into urban neighborhoods without sacrificing the safety of those who live, walk, bike, and attend school nearby.

Sutter Emeryville Hospital
Project
53 Street Impacts
Presented by 53 Street Residents
Brandon Soublet
[email protected]
Jennifer Ann Lee
[email protected]
Baruch Golden
[email protected]
PRESENTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE AT THEIR JUNE 17 MEETING Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
ANNA YATES – TRAFFIC OBSERVATION SUMMARY
On Wednesday, June 3, 2026, Planning staff observed 53rd Street traffic during Anna Yates drop-off (8:00-9:00am) and pickup hours (1:00-2:00pm). The Wednesday bell schedule is the same for grades TK to 8th. As shown in the figure below, staff were stationed along 53rd Street at Boyer Street, the roundabout, and San Pablo Avenue.

Key Findings
• During morning drop-off (~8:15 – 8:40 am), traffic congestion was concentrated along the loading zone (eastbound) and school entrance. Congestion occurred longer than in the afternoon, but queues cleared faster and with fewer cars. • During afternoon pickup (~1:25 – 1:50 pm), congestion was again concentrated along the loading zone and entry. Congestion peaked over a shorter time period than the morning, but cars queued for longer periods of time and in greater number, extending around the roundabout on both the east and westbound lanes. • Cars double-load in the eastbound lane, along the loading zone • During peak congestion, cars passed in the opposite lane or performed 3-point turns headed westbound
Staff did not see traffic blocking either entrance to Emery Bay Village during the observation periods.

Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
SITE #1 NOTES
At corner of 53rd Street and Boyer Street
Morning Drop-Off (8:00 – 9:00 am)
• Parking enforcement was present at 53rd and Emery Bay Dr • Drop-off zone was full around 8:24am, cleared out by 8:40am • Did not see many people drive out of Emery Bay until 8:30am • Several drivers (mostly west-bound) did three-point turns in the intersections (53rd St/Emery Bay Dr/Boyer St)
• Rolling stops, especially through the stop sign hidden behind the tree. • Did not see a backup of 3 or more cars
• Long intersection, east-bound on 53rd St and Emery Bay Dr was prone to speeding o Oddly-shaped intersection could be impacting the flow of traffic out of Emery Bay
Afternoon Pickup (1:00 – 2:00 pm)
• Parking enforcement showed up to the same spot
• Pick-up zone was full by 1:25pm
• Traffic got backed up into the circle and prevented some cars from using it o One truck had to do a three-point turn in the intersection o Even after the light turned green, cars did not move much at all • Pick-up zone was still full at 1:40pm
• One parent parked partially blocking crosswalk across Boyer St o There was an open spot in front of the car he was parked behind, but I don’t know if it was available when he got there
Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
• Pick-up zone was half clear at 1:45pm
• Traffic was back to normal by 1:50pm
• One jeep stopped in the middle of the road for pickup, but it did not block any traffic Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
SITE #2 NOTES
Stationary on the neon green circled area:

Morning Drop-Off (8:00 – 9:00 am)
Time Observation Notes
0810 A lot more traffic on 53rd x San Pablo compared to traffic on 53rd (in front of school/ loading zones)
0815 Kids getting dropped off near traffic circle
Parents park closer to ECDC and walk their kids to school too 0815 -
0825
Higher influx in cars. Cars tend to pile up and leads to some near traffic circle area
Few parents bike with kids
0830 Higher influx of cars
Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
*noticed cars parked in loading zone and parking zone is there to drop off kids and can last for 30 seconds to 10 minutes
0841 Garbage truck passes through 53rd from San Pablo
Very little traffic after 0840
0847 Amazon delivery driver double parking, for resident on 53rd *few drivers avoid speed hump (near traffic circle) by driving around it Afternoon Pickup (1:00 – 2:00 pm)
Time Observation Notes
1325 More parents/cars lining up
Cars blocking leading into traffic
Cars tend to pile up and leads to some near traffic circle area 1330-
1335
Cars u-turning/ double parking/ or from traffic light at San Pablo that caused congestion at the traffic circle
Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
1335 Cars on ROW picking up kids due to congestion
Parent parked car across the street from 53rd and crossed the traffic circle with kid
1345 Less traffic/ quiet
*noticed cars driving around speed humps
Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
SITE #3 NOTES
At corner of 53rd Street and San Pablo Avenue:

Morning Drop-Off (8:00 – 9:00 am)
START ~8:15 am
8:20 eastbound (EB) traffic congested between entrance gate and track ~2 minutes of complete blockage
8:22 EB cars u-turning at track to divert back to Hollis 8:25 Traffic clear in both directions
8:25 EB congestion up to gate; cars honking. Multiple cars double-parking Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
8:26 Traffic clears after double-parked cars clear; parents parking on north side and cross street for drop off
8:28 More loading/parking congestions
8:30 3 cars w/ blinkers on in WB lane
8:39 Traffic reducing, still seeing congestion, trash truck turned WB off San Pablo 8:41 double loading, u-turns
END ~8:42 am
---
Crossing guard – Monday + Friday is worse; traffic is better at end of school year Counted 18 instances of double loading (median 20 sec), ranging from 5 sec to 1:30 min Counted 5 u-turns (EB traffic, turning after the traffic circle, before the drop-off point) Afternoon Pickup (1:00 – 2:00 pm)
START ~1:08 pm (very quiet)
1:30 Kids start getting out. Multiple cars double loading (2+ minutes) 1:36 Multiple cars double loaded at gate – traffic backed up EB/WB, from SP intersection to the roundabout.
1:37 WB traffic starts to clear; EB queue turning into opposite lane to get around loading area
Anna Yates – Traffic Observation
June 3, 2026
1:40 Traffic congestion cleared out
END ~1:54 pm
---
Crossing guard – 3:00 release times are worse. Most traffic clears out within the first 30 mins of shift.

Longer loading times
Planning Commission Written Comment
Card
Submitted on
Receipt number
Related form version
Phone Number
Email Address
Street Address
Meeting Date
| wish to comment about
My comments
25 June 2026, 7:08pm
4 )
_ Will Freyman
[email protected]
1048 62nd Street
Oakland
California
94608
06/25/2026
Sutter hospital development project
Dear Members of the Emeryville Planning Commission, ,
| live in Oakland's Golden Gate neighborhood adjacent to Emeryville. | frequently bike and shop in Emeryville near the proposed Sutter hospital site. I'm writing in support of the project -- | believe it will contribute to a more vibrant neighborhood, improve access to care, and strengthen local businesses.

However, the project must not compromise transportation safety. lam particularly concerned about the removal of the traffic diverter on Horton Street, a bikeway | use often. Please relocate the diverter further north (e.g., north of Stanford) rather than eliminate it, and consider extending the protected bikeway on Horton south to Mandela. Please ensure that any impacted 1 of 2
bikeways meet NACTO guidelines for vehicle speed and volume thresholds, and implement mitigation measures such as
additional traffic diverters and new protected bikeways where needed,
Finally, given the projected increase in daily car trips, the Commission should work with Alameda County and AC Transit to improve transit and bike access along the San Pablo Avenue corridor to reduce vehicle dependence.
| support this project and ask that it be paired with strong commitments to safe, sustainable transportation.

Thank you for your consideration.
2 of 2
6/26/26, 1:39 PM FW: Concerns About Sutter Shuttle - Miroo Desai - Outlook ox Outlook
FW: Concerns About Sutter Shuttle
From Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/25/2026 7:23 PM
To Miroo Desai <[email protected]>
FY|
From: Bobby Lee <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2026 7:00 PM
To: Zoe Chafe (Planning Commission) <[email protected]>; Samuel Gould <[email protected]>; Rod Henmi <[email protected]>; Dianne Martinez <[email protected]>; Robert Rivera <[email protected]>; Maia Small <[email protected]>; Jordan Wax <[email protected]> Cc: Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>; Brooks Jessup <[email protected]>; Daniel Oliver <[email protected]>
Subject: Concerns About Sutter Shuttle
Dear Commissioners,
My name is Bobby Lee, and | serve as the Board Chair for the Emeryville Transportation Management Association (ETMA), which operates the Emery Go-Round free shuttle, the Emery Express private shuttle, and the 8-To-Go paratransit shuttle. | am writing alongside Director Brooks Jessup to express our strong perspective on a matter of significant importance. Please note that this letter reflects our views and not those of the entire ETMA Board or organization.

I’m writing about Study Session 7.1 — Sutter Hospital, specifically Question 1(d) on the staff report under “issues to consider”:
1) Does the Commission have any comments or direction regarding the project’s circulation plan and transportation improvements, including
(d) Whether the applicant should evaluate opportunities to coordinate the shuttle system with existing transit and community transportation services where doing so would reduce project impacts or improve transportation efficiency.

We are glad to see that Sutter is considering the transportation impacts of the project and proposing to mitigate them with shuttle service. However, we believe it is imperative that any new shuttle service attached to the project be effectively coordinated and integrated into Emeryville’s existing transit network, rather than operating independently of it.

Emeryville has long prioritized sustainable transportation by investing in the Emery Go-Round as the city’s de facto public transit solution. Funded through the general fund and a citywide parcel tax, the Emery Go-Round is specifically designed to reduce vehicle trips — especially single-occupancy vehicles — and to provide the very shuttle services Sutter is now proposing to duplicate.

Introducing an independent and potentially duplicative shuttle service in Emeryville will about:blank?windowld=SecondaryReadingPane5 1/2
6/26/26, 1:39 PM FW: Concerns About Sutter Shuttle - Miroo Desai - Outlook inevitably lead to confusion among residents, workers, and visitors, and will unnecessarily increase uncoordinated vehicle trips. Furthermore, Sutter’s shuttles are restricted to only patients and employees, which diminishes equitable transit opportunities for the broader Emeryville community.

It is disappointing that Sutter has advanced this proposal without consulting the ETMA, despite our previous outreach and clear willingness to collaborate. We discussed the benefits of coordination with Sutter and Hexagon staff at Sutter’s last open house, and our offer to work together remains open.

Since its inception in 1995, the Emery Go-Round has consolidated private shuttle services to eliminate duplication, reduce costs, and foster economic opportunity — while providing a vital last-mile connection to and from BART. We operate with what is likely the lowest per-hour cost of any transit service in the region, transporting hundreds of thousands of passengers annually and enabling true mode shift and sustainable mobility for Emeryville.

Today, ETMA and the Emery Go-Round stand ready and eager to deliver the very shuttle services Sutter envisions — without redundancy or added cost to the community. We respectfully urge this Commission to recommend that Sutter partner with us for the benefit of all Emeryville stakeholders.

Therefore, we respectfully urge the Commission to take the following actions:
1) Urge Sutter to engage in thoughtful conversations about transportation planning with the ETMA and City staff.
2) Consider pressing Sutter to utilize ETMA/Emery Go-Round as Sutter’s Emeryville Campus shuttle provider
3) Consider memorializing this in a community benefits agreement or similar document.

In closing, if Sutter’s proposed shuttle service remains independent and disconnected from Emeryville’s existing transit system, it could end up undermining rather than advancing Emeryville’s progress toward efficient, coordinated, and sustainable transit solutions.

Implementing a costly and potentially duplicative system is unnecessary and counter to the city’s vision. A similar mistake during the Sherwin-Williams development with the Emery Express resulted in confusion and inefficiency — an outcome we urge the Commission to avoid repeating.

We urge you to consider our input, advocate for our recommendations with Sutter and City staff, and ensure these provisions are integrated into the forthcoming development agreements.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Bobby Lee
Board Chair, ETMA
Brooks Jessup
Director, ETMA
about:blank?windowld=SecondaryReadingPane5S 2/2
6/26/26, 1:39 PM Inbox - Miroo Desai - Outlook
& Outlook
Community Concerns Regarding the Proposed Hospital
From Oi Julie <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/25/2026 7:59 PM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
Dear City. Council Members,
| am a resident of Emeryville, and | love this community. Emeryville is a very small city, with only about 13,000 residents and just over one square mile of land. That small size is exactly what makes our community special.
| understand that the large vacant commercial buildings in Emeryville will eventually need to be occupied, and | support responsible development that benefits our community. However, | am deeply concerned that building another large hospital or medical campus is not the right fit for our city.

Emeryville already has several medical buildings and healthcare facilities. At the same time, our city already struggles with heavy traffic, especially from commuters, visitors, and employees of existing commercial buildings. Residents regularly experience streets filled with parked cars, including vehicles blocking or parking in front of residential driveways. This has become a daily frustration for many of us.
| have a toddler, and there is a daycare directly across from my home. Every day | see vehicles speeding through our neighborhood. Despite the presence of young children, there are still no speed bumps, school-zone protections, or sufficient traffic-calming measures. Adding a major hospital would bring even more employees, patients, visitors, buses, delivery vehicles, emergency - vehicles, and helicopter traffic into an already congested area. | respectfully ask the City to consider whether this project truly serves the needs of Emeryville residents or primarily serves the interests of a large healthcare corporation. Before approving a project of this scale, | hope the City carefully evaluates its long-term impact on traffic, neighborhood safety, noise, parking, and the quality of life for the families who live here. | appreciate everything the City has done to improve Emeryville, and | recognize that development is important. However, | believe our community needs investments in neighborhood safety first— including traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and protections for children—before adding another large regional destination that will significantly increase congestion.

Please listen to the voices of the residents who call Emeryville home. We care deeply about this city, and we want to ensure it remains a safe, livable community for families now and in the future.

Thank you for your time and consideration.
https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAKALgGAAAAAAHY QDEapmEc2byACqAC%2F EWg0Ab0jAUxnM NOG1JWgMIPbytQAKPZ2adQAA?nativeVers... 1/2 6/26/26, 1:39 PM Inbox - Miroo Desai - Outlook
Sincerely,
Jee Choi
https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAKALgAAAAAAHY QDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWgOAb0j|AUxnMNOG1JWgMIPbytQAKPZ2adQAA?nativeVers... 2/2 6/26/26, 1:48 PM Public Comment 6/25/2026 - Miroo Desai - Outlook & Outlook
Public Comment 6/25/2026
From Damien Reggio <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/23/2026 11:46 AM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
This is concerning Sutter Hospital Medical Center (PUD25-001) | think it is great we are getting a hospital, the people and business it will bring to the area are a benefit.

My one concern is westbound bicycle traffic on 53rd. This is a major bicycle route connecting to the Emeryville Greenway. Westbound bicycle traffic will be endangered by the curb cuts, pedestrains and loading/unloading of hospital patrons.
| request that you consider removing the westbound raised bicycle path and expanding the eastbound raised bicycle path to be bidirectional to mitigate these issues.

Maritime st nearby is an example where this has been successfully accomplished.

Thank you,
Damien Reggio
about:blank?windowld=SecondaryReadingPane7/ 1/1
6/26/26, 1:49 PM Public Comment - Sutter Hospital Study Session.(PUD25-001) - Miroo Desai - Outlook &® Outlook
Public Comment - Sutter Hospital Study Session (PUD25-001) From Sandeep S <[email protected]>
Date Mon 6/15/2026 8:44 PM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
Cc = Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>; Miroo Desai <[email protected]> Dear members of the Planning Commission,
| am a resident and owner at 26 Emery Bay Drive, in the Emery Bay Village community directly across 53rd Street from the proposed Sutter Health campus. | am writing regarding the June 25 study session on the Chiron PUD amendment (PUD25-001).
| am not writing to oppose the project. A new medical center can bring real benefits to Emeryville. | am writing to ask the City to ensure the forthcoming environmental review studies and mitigates the impacts that fall hardest on the immediately adjacent residential neighborhood. Because this is the scoping stage, | am asking that the EIR be directed to address the following. #1 - Shadow and shade study
At 330 feet this would be (I believe) the tallest building in the city and requires a General Plan Amendment. Please require a shadow and shade analysis at the summer solstice, winter solstice, and equinoxes, specific to the residential parcels south of 53rd Street, including Emery Bay Village.

Residents should be able to see the actual sun impact on our homes before any height approval. #2 - Pedestrian and bicycle access
The project removes street trees on 53rd Street. That bridge is our primary pedestrian and bicycle connection to Bay Street and the Bay Trail. Please require that continuous, safe pedestrian and bicycle access along 53rd Street and to the pedestrian bridge be maintained throughout construction, with no permanent loss of that route. Please also clarify how the demolition at 4595 Horton affects the bridge approach.
#3 - Construction traffic and disruption
A multi-year build of this scale will heavily affect the roads next to our homes. Please require a construction traffic management plan with defined haul and truck routes that avoid the 53rd Street and Hollis Street residential-frontage, limits on lane closures along those streets, and a clear construction phasing schedule shared with neighbors. The recent Hollis street upgrades took longer than expected and a considerable disruption for us during that time. #4 - Operational noise
about:blank? windowld=SecondaryReadingPane8& 1/2
6/26/26, 1:49 PM Public Comment - Sutter Hospital Study Session (PUD25-001) - Miroo Desai - Outlook Please require the EIR to analyze operational noise on the residential side, including the location of the emergency room and ambulance entrance, projected ambulance trip counts, mechanical and generator equipment, and loading docks. Please confirm whether a helipad or rooftop helistop is proposed, and require that the ambulance entrance and routing be sited away from the residential frontage on 53rd Street.
#5 - Street trees
Please require full, in-kind replacement of the street trees removed on 53rd Street, with a maintenance commitment, so the character of our street is restored.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. | appreciate the Commission's attention to the residents who live closest to this project, and | am glad to provide more detail. #6 - Safety and security
A 24-hour hospital and a large parking structure bring continuous activity, traffic, and lighting directly next to homes. Please require the applicant to provide a campus safety and security plan, including security staffing, parking garage security, management of after-hours activity at the emergency room entrance, and coordination with Emeryville Police and Fire on response and capacity. Please also require a lighting and photometric plan that prevents light from spilling into Emery Bay Village windows, using shielding and nighttime dimming where feasible.

Pedestrian safety on 53rd Street should be addressed given the added ambulance and vehicle volume, and the construction site should be fully secured throughout the build, with perimeter fencing and lighting that does not spill into the adjacent homes. As part of being a good neighbor, please ask the applicant to commit to maintaining the public realm along the 53rd Street campus edge, including security presence, cleanliness, and lighting.
| would also welcome information on Sutter's behavioral health, social work, and discharge planning resources, since a well-staffed program supports both patients and the surrounding neighborhood.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. | appreciate the Commission's attention to the residents who live closest to this project, and | am glad to provide more detail if requested.

Sincerely,
Sandeep Suresh
26 Emery Bay Drive
Emeryville, CA 94608
about:blank?windowld=SecondaryReadingPane8& 2/2
6/26/26, 1:40 PM no to hospital on 53rd st - Miroo Desai - Outlook @® Outlook
no to hospital on 53rd st
From Noah Kavic <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/25/2026 4:55 PM
To = Planning Commission <[email protected]>
Hi,
| just wanted to express my concern about the proposed hospital. | don't think our city can support this without dramatically affecting those living nearby. Plus | don't understand how it benefits the city.

They don't have to pay taxes because its going to be a “non-profit” hospital? Ot just doesn't make sense.

Thank you,
Noah Kavic
Resident in Emeryville
about:blank? windowld=SecondaryReadingPane6 1
Planning Commission Written Comment
Card
Submitted on
Receipt number
Related form version
25 June 2026, 2:46pm
3 0
Name Bill Reuter & Ruth Major
Phone Number 5106538881
Email Address [email protected]
Street Address 2 Commodore Drive #175
City Emeryville
State CA
Zip Code 94608
Meeting Date 06/25/2026
| wish to comment about Sutter Hospital
My comments To Planning Commissioners, ;
We are concerned about the Sutter plan to build a complex medical facility here in Emeryville. Whatever the potential economic gains for the city, we do not think in the long term this proposal advances quality of life for citizens of Emeryville, certainly not for those living in the vicinity of the proposed project nor for the rest of us. The disruptions all this will cause far - outweigh any short or, especially, long term advantages for the city. We are two long time residents (Bill since 1979, Ruth since 1984) and have been activists for causes or in services seeking to keep our city livable and prosperous. We jain many other concerned citizens in opposing this inappropriate use of the site designated. We will be attending your meeting and discussion of the Sutter project via Zoom this evening. We are counting on you to give the issue your closest and, appropriately, critical attention. 1 of 2
Bill Reuter and Ruth Major
2 of 2
Planning Commission Written Comment
Card
Submitted on
Receipt number
Related form version
24 June 2026, 1:55pm
1 )
Name > Damien Reggio
~ Phone Number
Email Address
Street Address
_ City
State
Zip Code
Meeting Date 06/25/2026
I wish to comment about Sutter Hospital Medical Center (PUD25-001) My comments | think it is great we are getting a hospital, the people and business it will bring to the area are a benefit.

My one concern is westbound bicycle traffic on 53rd. This is a major bicycle route connecting to the Emeryville Greenway.

Westbound bicycle traffic will be endangered by the curb cuts, pedestrains and loading/unloading of hospital patrons.
| request that you consider removing the westbound raised bicycle path and expanding the eastbound raised bicycle path to be bidirectional to mitigate these issues.

Maritime st nearby is an example where this has been
successfully accomplished.
1 of 2
Thank you,
Damien Reggio
20f2
Planning Commission Written Comment
Card
Submitted on 24 June 2026, 11:45pm
Receipt number 2
Related form version 0
Name
Phone Number
Email Address
7 Street Address
City Emeryville 7
State CA
Zip Code 94608
Meeting Date 06/25/2026
| wish to comment about Sutter Hospital Medical Center & Noise Pollution My comments The noise pollution caused by daily and nightly ambulance sirens and emergency helicopter landings/departures will negatively _ impact the quality of life and health of some Emeryville residents who live on/near Hollis Street or near the proposed hospital site. | urge the Planning Commission to actively seek out more detailed data from Sutter Health as well as published scientific research ° that will enable you to predict and imagine the proposed - hospital’s impact on our acoustic environment, human health, and quality of life.

The June 25th Planning Commission Staff Report states on page six that an emergency helicopter will land at a “frequency of approximately one round-trip flight per day, including nighttime hours.” There are.no details regarding the flight path and sound 1 of 2
level of an emergency helicopter as it would fly over Emeryville and land at the hospital.

The Planning Commission Staff Report states on page seven, “Primary routes for ambulances arriving at the hospital are Hollis Street and Peladeau Street/Chiron Way.” But there is no information in the report regarding the approximate frequency and time-of-day of ambulance trips that require sirens.

Please dig into this important topic. Don’t allow an analytical gap to diminish the quality and integrity of the City's decision-making process for the Sutter Hospital Medical Center.
2 of 2
Submitted by C. Zheng (EBV Resident) Planning Commission 2026-06-25 - Written Public Comment

ABOUT EMERY BAY VILLAGE (EBV)
Residential complex on 53rd Street (between Hollis & San Pablo) located 1 block east of proposed Sutter Health project
Residential complex of 100+ condos across 40+ buildings.

One of the city’s largest tree canopies: Emery Bay Village is home to one of the largest tree canopies in the city and a natural habitat to birds & wildlife. (Action: EIR request)
e Between Hollis & San Pablo, 53rd Street runs through Emery Bay Village, Spur Alley (incl youth gymnastics center), and multiple schools (Emeryville Child Development Center, Anna Yates K-8, Emery High School). (Action: General Plan amendment request)

CEQA & CITY REQUESTS
SOW Figure 7 with public comment annotations

KEY SCHOOL CORRIDOR OBSERVATIONS
(TRAFFIC OFFICER)
On-the-ground observations were shared with me during an informal 15-minute discussion with the traffic officer regularly stationed outside the school during peak hours. Personal key takeaways (some e = By foot: Students begin arriving on foot around 8:00 a.m. from multiple directions all over the city, including: The Emery apartments on Hubbard Street, apartments near 65¢h Street, apartments on Christie, from San Pablo corridor.
e By bus: Students arrive by Emery Go Round (53rd & Hollis). 531d Street key walking route for students: Many will walk through 53rd Street on the sidewalk adjacent to Emery Bay Village as part of their route to/from school.
e After school: After 3:00 p.m. bell, many students remain in the area for after-school programs.
e@ San Pablo Avenue challenges: 4 way; vehicles back up at the San Pablo light (runs on a different signal schedule in AM). e Oakland jurisdiction: Parts of 53rd near school fall within Oakland’s jurisdiction; may limit enforcement of certain citations. [MExpand traffic study beyond current scope’s
preliminary set of 79 study locations. Add > 3
overlooked access points along 53rd Street impacting
Emery Bay Village, Spur Alley, and the school sites.

PMExpand traffic study (Spur Alley corridor): Spur
Alley does not appear to be reflected in EIR scope of
work. Spur Alley, located next to Emery Bay Village, is likely the closest side street to Hollis and Sutter Health.

Spur Alley stretches over multiple blocks from 45th
Street to Stanford, across multiple businesses, including a kid’s gymnasium center.

EME cological impact study (Emery Bay Village):

Require ecological impact study to be conducted for
Emery Bay Village (e.g. impacts to tree canopy and
wildlife habitat resulting from potential construction, air quality, acoustic impacts e.g. ambulances).

FRE cological impact study (near Shuttle Depot):

Require ecological impact study to be conducted for
Temescal Creek, the waterway located alongside the
South Bayfront Bridge and next to the demolition site
for the proposed Shuttle Depot.

5. Student pedestrian impact: Expand the transportation

CITY GENERAL PLAN
Figure 5-3; Current Designated Pedestrian Priority Zones rE 6 "Pedestrian Priority Zones depict generakzed locations and are not Intended to Identify precise buildings or distances. analysis to include official student pedestrian study that maps common walking routes to/from schools, and
evaluates project-related impacts.

Zoning designation for 53rd Street radius: Amend
General Plan to apply Pedestrian Priority Zone
designation to entire 53rd Street between Hollis & San
Pablo radius. Between Hollis & San Pablo, 53rd Street
connects through Emery Bay Village multi-family
housing, Spur Alley (including a youth gymnastics
center), a preschool, an elementary school, a middle
school, and a high school. (see public comment
annotation in red; Figure 5-3 of City’s General Plan)
Ox Outlook
Sutter Hospital Medical Center (PUD25-001) — Study Session, June 25, 2026 From B Lopez <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/25/2026 9:13 AM
To Miroo Desai <[email protected]>; Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]> 0) 1 attachment (2 MB)
Letter_to_Emeryville_Planning_Sutter_Hospital.pdf;
Dear Ms. Desai and Members of the Emeryville Planning Commission:
| am an Oakland resident living adjacent to the Emeryville city boundary, on Stanford Avenue, within blocks of the proposed Sutter Hospital Medical Center at 5300 Chiron Way.

This project brings significant economic and healthcare value to the region. A full-service hospital with emergency and inpatient services, skilled construction jobs, and a medical employment hub would be a meaningful asset.
|. The Traffic Impacts on Stanford Avenue, San Pablo Avenue, and Market Street Must Be Analyzed
The project proposes adding approximately 20,000 vehicle trips per day to the regional transportation network, serving 2,814 daily employees and up to 12,060 daily visitors. The staff report focuses traffic concern on 53rd Street and the immediate campus perimeter, but the reality is this will add thousands of vehicles to an already beleaguered and under-resourced high injury corridor of Stanford Avenue. | respectfully request if it doesn't already, that the transportation study area explicitly include Stanford Avenue, San Pablo, and Market street corridors, with traffic count data collected at Oakland-side intersections before, during, and after construction.
ll. Stanford Avenue Is a High Injury Network Corridor With No Planned Safety Investments Stanford Avenue is designated by the Oakland Department of Transportation as part of the High Injury Network, meaning it is among the 8% of Oakland streets responsible for 60% of severe and fatal collisions.

The City of Oakland has, to date, not addressed these documented conditions. To my knowledge, there are no currently funded or designed safety improvements planned to address speeding or pedestrian safety for our stretch of the corridor. There are no speed cushions on several long stretches of Stanford. Signal enforcement at multiple intersections is effectively absent. | am concerned that our Oakland-side streets are ill prepared to absorb the addition of tens of thousands of daily vehicle trips to our neighborhood.
| know first-hand the impacts of traffic violence. My mother in-law was hit by an unauthorized driver who ran a red light going 50 miles an hour, four blocks from Stanford avenue. | want to wholeheartedly support this project, but | must share with your city the reality of our Oakland street conditions.
lll. Ask
lam asking for is straightforward: meaningful inclusion in the EIR study area, honest traffic analysis of the corridors we live and travel on in Oakland that are impacted, and a commitment that the mitigation measures in the Development Agreement or Community Benefits Agreement will include specific, funded improvements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure connecting Emeryville and Oakland. | request to address the following as part of the EIR and entitlement process:

Ensure the traffic study area includes Stanford Avenue, San Pablo Avenue, and Market Street, with a separate analysis of pedestrian and bicycle safety impacts on these corridors.

Conduct a baseline safety assessment of the Stanford Avenue and San Pablo corridors, including vehicle speeds, crash history, and pedestrian crossing compliance, before the project adds vehicle trips to the region.

Require the Development Agreement or Community Benefits Agreement to include specific, funded bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements via Stanford Avenue.

Address emergency vehicle access conflicts with sideshows and traffic calming measures on primary ambulance corridors through Oakland neighborhoods.

Coordinate with the City of Oakland to ensure that Oakland-side impacts are studied, that Oakland residents receive notice of future hearings and comment periods, and that Oakland is a named participant in the transportation planning process for this project.

Respectfully submitted,
Bobbi Lopez
June 25, 2026
Re: Sutter Hospital Medical Center (PUD25-001) — Study Session, June 25, 2026 Dear Ms. Desai and Members of the Emeryville Planning Commission:
| am an Oakland resident living adjacent to the Emeryville city boundary, on Stanford Avenue, within blocks of the proposed Sutter Hospital Medical Center at 5300 Chiron Way.

This project brings significant economic and healthcare value to the region. A full-service hospital with emergency and inpatient services, skilled construction jobs, and a medical employment hub would be a meaningful asset.
|. The Traffic Impacts on Stanford Avenue, San Pablo Avenue, and Market Street Must Be Analyzed
The project proposes adding approximately 20,000 vehicle trips per day to the regional transportation network, serving 2,814 daily employees and up to 12,060 daily visitors. The staff report focuses traffic concern on 53rd Street and the immediate campus perimeter, but the reality is this will add thousands of vehicles to an already beleaguered and under-resourced high injury corridor of Stanford Avenue. | respectfully request if it doesn't already, that the transportation study area explicitly include Stanford Avenue, San Pablo, and Market street corridors, with traffic count data collected at Oakland-side intersections before, during, and after construction.
ll. Stanford Avenue Is a High Injury Network Corridor With No Planned Safety Investments Stanford Avenue is designated by the Oakland Department of Transportation as part of the High Injury Network, meaning it is among the 8% of Oakland streets responsible for 60% of severe and fatal collisions.

The City of Oakland has, to date, not addressed these documented conditions. To my knowledge, there are no currently funded or designed safety improvements planned to address speeding or pedestrian safety for our stretch of the corridor. There are no speed cushions on several long stretches of Stanford. Signal enforcement at multiple intersections is effectively absent. | am concerned that our Oakland-side streets are ill prepared to absorb the addition of tens of thousands of daily vehicle trips to our neighborhood. | know first-hand the impacts of traffic violence.

My mother in-law was hit by an unauthorized driver who ran a red light going 50 miles an hour, four blocks from Stanford avenue.
| want to whole heartedly support this project, but | must share with your city the reality of our Oakland street conditions. Below | share the High Injury Corridor along Stanford and San Pablo and then a map of the proposed investments (or lack thereof). ewocsnnnee™
aneeeny
a 3 |
Image showing the City of Oakland’s Department of Transportation (OakDOT) proposed project plans with NO proposed pedestrian improvements for the High Injury Corridor of Stanford Avenue-there are two bike crossing improvements.
lll. Ask
| am asking for is straightforward: meaningful inclusion in the EIR study area, honest traffic analysis of the corridors we live and travel on in Oakland that are impacted, and a commitment that the mitigation measures in the Development Agreement or Community Benefits Agreement will include specific, funded improvements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure connecting Emeryville and Oakland. | request to address the following as part of the EIR and entitlement process:
° Ensure the traffic study area includes Stanford Avenue, San Pablo Avenue, and Market Street, with a separate analysis of pedestrian and bicycle safety impacts on these corridors. ° Conduct a baseline safety assessment of the Stanford Avenue and San Pablo corridors, including vehicle speeds, crash history, and pedestrian crossing compliance, before the project adds vehicle trips to the region.
. Require the Development Agreement or Community Benefits Agreement to include specific, funded bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements via Stanford Avenue. = Address emergency vehicle access conflicts with sideshows and traffic calming measures on primary ambulance corridors through Oakland neighborhoods. < Coordinate with the City of Oakland to ensure that Oakland-side impacts are studied, that Oakland residents receive notice of future hearings and comment periods, and that Oakland is a named participant in the transportation planning process for this project.

Respectfully submitted,
Bobbi Lopez
Attachments: Recent photographs documenting Stanford Avenue High Injury Network conditions Stanford Ave-speeds so high, the car was mangled. Stanford-a stolen vehicle going high speeds and crashing into multiple cars on a side street.
se Outlook
Comment for June 25 Planning Commission
From Pay 6532 <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/25/2026 7:33 AM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
To: City of Emeryville Planning Commission
The noise pollution caused by daily and nightly ambulance sirens and emergency helicopter landings/departures will negatively impact the quality of life and health of some Emeryville residents who live on/near Hollis Street or near the proposed hospital site. | urge the Planning Commission to actively seek out more detailed data from Sutter Health as well as published scientific research that will enable you to predict and imagine the proposed hospital's impact on our acoustic environment, human health, and quality of life.

The June 25th Planning Commission Staff Report states on page six that an emergency helicopter will land at a “frequency of approximately one round-trip flight per day, including nighttime hours.” There are no details regarding the flight path and sound level of an emergency helicopter as it would fly over Emeryville and land at the hospital.

The Planning Commission Staff Report states on page seven, “Primary routes for ambulances arriving at the hospital are Hollis Street and Peladedu Street/Chiron Way.” But there is no information in the report regarding the approximate frequency and time-of-day of ambulance trips that require sirens.

Please dig into this important topic. Don’t allow an analytical gap to diminish the quality and integrity of the City’s decision-making process for the Sutter Hospital Medical Center.

Oud Outlook
No hospital on 53rd St.

From [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/24/2026 10:28 AM
To Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>; Planning Commission <[email protected]> Good morning:
| appreciate you taking the time to read this email.
| am very upset over the idea of a huge hospital being built two blocks from my house. | am very upset over the zoning being changed to accommodate this.

Currently, the businesses operating in my quiet neighborhood are closed at night. People arrive to work around here in the morning, and leave at the end of the work day. We enjoy a peaceful, litter-free, low graffiti, no encampments environment filled with families living life. Significantly, families have been drawn to this area by the promise of a certain lifestyle, encouraged by the city of Emeryville.

Not surprisingly, many children, bicycles, baby carriages, dog walkers, and other pedestrians pass my house each day. On this stretch of 53rd Street people access an elementary school, a high school, community and school athletic fields (where many soccer games occur 7 days a week sometimes until 9:30 PM), a running track, a community center where various activities take place, a children's camp, an Early Childhood Development daycare center, and residential homes.

This neighborhood is Bicycle Blvds and single lane streets.

This neighborhood is clean, peaceful, quiet, safe, and desirable.

What on earth would possess you to consider changing this neighborhood for the worse? Noise...currently, when there is noise in our neighborhood, it is the sound of children playing and sports games.
_ Helicopters
Speeding ambulances
Lost traffic and cut through traffic
Competition for already crowded free street parking in a neighborhood where a number of houses don't have off street parking
Wanderers who are discovering the area and scoping it out Trash, cigarette butts, graffiti, rise in crime
Pedestrian/traffic dangers
. Loss in property values
Encampments start showing up
Feces on the sidewalk
Seriously? That lot is the absolute wrong place for this project. Don't do this. Let this not-forprofit, non-tax paying hospital spend some of their money and retrofit their existing building. It's not my job to sacrifice quality of life so they can save money.

It has taken my husband and | many years of sacrifice and planning to be able to put a down payment on our home and buy this place. We're about to do work on our foundation. We have a high mortgage payment. It's all been worth it...we love it here! Please don't wreck our neighborhood. Please. Please.

Sincerely,
Patricia Lincoln
se Outlook
Regarding Sutter Hospital .

From denise orlovski <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/24/2026 7:51 PM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
Cc — Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>
Hello,
Thank you for receiving my comments regarding Sutter Hospital plans. | want to suggest a specific person to handle all neighborhood problems created by Sutter.

An ombudsman. If a machine is creating a neighborhood nuisance, trash is building up, or needles are showing up on sidewalk,
the ombudsman can be easily contacted.

For example, 5980 Hollis currently has a broken rooftop HVAC throwing out loud noise 24/7 across several neighborhood blocks.

The city is unresponsive because they are too busy, and the problem is dismissed by engineers because the fix is too costly.

Let's make sure this does not happen in the neighborhood surrounding Sutter. Create an ombudsman position.

The ombudsman would work for the neighbors surrounding Sutter keeping them a good neighbor.

Thank you,
Denise
Emeryville Resident
Ont Outlook
Sutter Health Proposal
From Steve <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/24/2026 3:05 PM
To Planning Commission <[email protected]>
Cc = Chadrick Smalley <[email protected]>
Re: Sutter Health Proposal Meeting Thursday June 25, 2026 Hospital or high-rise condos- which is it? New developer ploy to get one or the other? With no further restrictions? Old contractor trick: always ask for more than you ever expect to get. | live 4 blocks to the West of the purposed projects in a single family neighborhood with a big park. | oppose the HOSPITAL as follows: 1.) Noise Pollution: A helipad so near a condo and single family home neighborhood increases stress and higher blood pressure. Even while you sleep. Read about it! 2.) Air Pollution: Helicopters emit huge amounts of pollution. As well as certain exhausts from hospitals such as skin cauterization aren't any better.. We live downwind! Read about it! Would you want to live nearby? 3.) Seismic Considerations: The ‘89 quake was on the San Andreas Fault. 56 miles away. The Hayward Fault is just a few miles away. It averages a major quake every 140 years. It’s been 158 years since the last big one. A giant high-rise will probably survive. But most of the East Bay will be destroyed, especially if liquefaction is a factor.

Makes it more difficult to even reach a much needed hospital. There are several other more. appropriate places to build a hospital in the area. 4.) Congestion: A hospital will clog the freeways even more with commuters and more poor air quality. Condos would allow for workers to walk to a lot of jobs and a lot of local amenities. Food, fun and community. As for CONDOS: 1.) Lesser of the 2 evils.

So long as you knock off 10 stories, to at least attempt to blend into the East Bay community rather than use it for profits. 2.) Contact the Sogorea Te’ Land Trust and pay them a generous land use tax.

This is Ohlone land that was taken from them. They collect a land tax from all willing property owners.

Do the right thing! 3.) Offer any Emeryville homeowner a big discount on Bay view units near the top! HUH? Why not? We'll be eating your dust for awhile longer and deserve at least a housecleaning gift card! In Summary: Is the recent surge in Sutter Health activity involving their loud empty buses circling the neighborhoods and parks, spewing toxic fumes for lack of catalytic converters, is a wake up call? With neighbors like that, | think I'll eventually leave this town that my family and | have called home since building that home in 1992. Sincerely, Steve Holmes 1253 Stanford Ave. Downwind [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
City of Emeryville

C A L I F O R N I A

M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: LaTanya Bellow, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen, Finance Director
SUBJECT: WARRANTS

ATTACHED ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FOR CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY APPROVAL AT THE MEETING OF JULY 21, 2026:
▪ Wire Transfers and Debit Authorizations for June 9, 2026, through July 13, 2026, in the amount of $730,256.01
▪ Warrant Register for the City of Emeryville dated July 13, 2026, in the amount of $5,386,483.84
▪ No Wire Transfers and Debt Authorizations for the Successor Agency for June 9, 2026, through July 13, 2026.
▪ Warrant Register for the Successor Agency dated July 13, 2026, in the amount of $1,240,724.26
I certify that the above-stated demands are accurate, and funds are available for payment thereof.

City of Emeryville and Successor Agency Wire Transfers from June 9, 2026 through July 13, 2026 Org Acct Project Wire Date Payee Description Amount
101 21520 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE MEDICAL PREMIUM $ 215,187.61 710 72400 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 RETIRE MEDICAL PREMIUM $ 17,749.75 1600 80360 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 ACTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $ 172.15 1600 80360 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 RETIRE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $ 66.24 101 21520 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 ACTIVE NON CALPERS $ 4,709.18 1600 21520 6/8/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM JUNE 2026 ACTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $ 3.77 101 2174 6/9/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION $ 86,746.59 101 2173 6/9/2026 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION $ 75,186.62 101 2130 6/18/2026 EMERYVILLE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES - EPOA $ 2,325.00 101 2130 6/18/2026 EMERYVILLE POLICE MANAGERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES - EPMA $ 80.00 101 2134 6/18/2026 SEIU UNION DUES - SEIU $ 3,325.34
101 2187 6/18/2026 PARS EPOA PARS CONTRIBUTION $ 6,642.60 101 2186 6/18/2026 WELLS FARGO BANK VEBA CONTRIBUTION DEPOSIT $ 34,566.92 101 2144 6/18/2026 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 457 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #300529 $ 39,653.72 101 2144 6/18/2026 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 401A CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN $ 5,925.11 101 2138 6/18/2026 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT EXPERT PAY CHILD SUPPORT $ 313.38 101 2120 6/23/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - CITY $ 95,019.32 101 2128 6/23/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (SS/FICA) - CITY $ 63,111.74 101 2128 6/23/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - CITY $ 23,318.38 101 2128 6/23/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT ADD'L MED) - CITY $ - 101 2122 6/23/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD -(CITY) $ 45,449.97 101 2122 6/23/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE (SDI)-CITY $ 6,476.47 101 2120 6/24/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - CITY $ 1,013.42 101 2128 6/24/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (SS/FICA) - CITY $ 2,232.00 101 2128 6/24/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - CITY $ 522.00 101 2128 6/24/2026 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT ADD'L MED) - CITY $ - 101 2122 6/24/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD -(CITY) $ 458.73 101 2122 6/24/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE (SDI)-CITY $ - TOTAL $ 730,256.01
SUCCESSOR AGENCY There are No Items for Successor Agency $ - TOTAL $ -
November 4, 2025 through December 31, 2025
Org Acct Project Wire Date Payee Description Amount
Carried Forward From Page 1 Total $ 1,085,868.83
101 2152 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE MEDICAL PREMIUM $210,073.41 710 72400 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 RETIRE MEDICAL PREMIUM $17,675.50 1900 80360 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 ACTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $168.06 1900 80360 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 RETIRE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $59.69 101 21520 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 ACTIVE NON CALPERS $2,893.54 101 21520 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DECEMBER 2025 ACTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE COST $2.31 101 2186 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION (CITY) $ 95,068.47 101 2186 12/5/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION (MESA) $ 69,870.98 101 2130 12/5/2025 EMERYVILLE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES DEPOSIT $ 2,475.00 101 2130 12/5/2025 EMERYVILLE POLICE MANAGERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES DEDUCTIONS $ 80.00 101 2134 12/5/2025 SEIU MESA UNION DUES $ 3,313.28
101 2187 12/5/2025 PARS EPOA PARS CONTRIBUTION $ 7,713.36 101 2186 12/5/2025 WELLS FARGO BANK VEBA CONTRIBUTION DEPOSIT - CITY $ 1,125.00 101 2186 12/5/2025 WELLS FARGO BANK VEBA CONTRIBUTION DEPOSIT - MESA $ 1,525.00 101 2144 12/5/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 457 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #300529 $ 13,263.85 101 2144 12/5/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 457 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #304740 $ 18,896.37 101 2144 12/5/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 401 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #107052 $ 6,674.63 101 2138 12/5/2025 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT EXPERT PAY CHILD SUPPORT $ 267.23 101 2120 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - CITY $ 49,106.92 101 2128 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - CITY $ 9,352.86 101 2128 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT ADD'L MED) - CITY $ 1,680.38 101 2120 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - MESA $ 54,186.68 101 2128 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (SSF/FICA) - MESA $ 45,461.44 101 2128 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - MESA $ 13,591.38 101 2128 12/5/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (ADD'L MED) - MESA $ 698.14 101 2122 12/5/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD -(CITY) $ 21,525.20 101 2122 12/5/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD - (MESA) $ 24,005.89 101 2124 12/5/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE - (MESA) $ 5,328.75 101 2186 12/19/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION (CITY) $ - 101 2186 12/19/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION (MESA) $ - 101 2130 12/19/2025 EMERYVILLE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES DEPOSIT $ 2,475.00 101 2130 12/19/2025 EMERYVILLE POLICE MANAGERS ASSOCIATION POLICE UNION DUES DEDUCTIONS $ 80.00 101 2134 12/19/2025 SEIU MESA UNION DUES DEDUCTION $ 3,261.41 101 2187 12/19/2025 PARS EPOA PARS CONTRIBUTION $ 7,207.95 101 2186 12/19/2025 WELLS FARGO BANK VEBA CONTRIBUTION DEPOSIT - CITY $ 1,125.00 101 2186 12/19/2025 WELLS FARGO BANK VEBA CONTRIBUTION DEPOSIT - MESA $ 1,525.00 101 2144 12/19/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 457 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #300529 $ 13,159.86 101 2144 12/19/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 457 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #304740 $ 18,483.95 101 2144 12/19/2025 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST-MISSION SQUARE 401 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN #107052 $ 6,658.36 101 2138 12/19/2025 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT EXPERT PAY CHILD SUPPORT $ 267.23 101 2120 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - CITY $ 46,750.10 101 2128 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - CITY $ 8,926.20 101 2128 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT ADD'L MED) - CITY $ 1,944.65 101 2120 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (FWT) - MESA $ 53,294.27 101 2128 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (SSF/FICA) - MESA $ 44,934.54 101 2128 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (MED) - MESA $ 13,753.58 101 2128 12/24/2025 IRS - EFTPS FED TAX DEPOSIT (ADD'L MED) - MESA $ 739.46 101 2122 12/24/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD -(CITY) $ 20,925.61 101 2122 12/24/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE INCOME TAX WITHELD - (MESA) $ 23,682.79 101 2124 12/24/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE - (MESA) $ 5,511.78 TOTAL $ 2,036,658.89
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086789 V 05/27/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 2100 77150 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 0.00 -301.51 1000 20086789 V 05/27/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 CITY CLERK LARGE TO 0.00 -661.76 1000 20086789 V 05/27/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 LESS DOUBLE CHARGE 0.00 330.88 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 -632.39
1000 20086851 06/10/26 1335 ADAMSON POLICE PROD 2100 73400 CONCEALABLE CARRIER 0.00 1,091.48 1000 20086851 06/10/26 1335 ADAMSON POLICE PROD 2100 73400 CONCEALABLE CARRIER 0.00 1,091.48 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,182.96
1000 20086852 06/10/26 1031 ALL MOBILE DETAILS 2200 77100 FL WASH 5/6,13,20, 0.00 1,745.00 1000 20086853 06/10/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4160 SUPP INSUR 0.00 275.23 1000 20086853 06/10/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4150 FSA-DEPCAR 0.00 640.52 1000 20086853 06/10/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4100 FSA-HLTHCR 0.00 1,813.35 1000 20086853 06/10/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4170 SUPP INSUR 0.00 1,930.24 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,659.34
1000 20086854 06/10/26 1347 AMERICAN SOIL PRODU 4060 73515 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 0.00 267.13 1000 20086854 06/10/26 1347 AMERICAN SOIL PRODU 4060 73515 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 0.00 333.91 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 601.04
1000 20086856 06/10/26 1186 CITY OF BERKELEY 2200 88250 7/25-6/26 ANIMAL CA 0.00 88,516.00 1000 20086856 V 06/10/26 1186 CITY OF BERKELEY 2200 88250 7/25-6/26 ANIMAL CA 0.00 -88,516.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 20086857 06/10/26 3237 COMCAST 2100 76050 6/17 81554004104758 0.00 296.95 1000 20086859 06/10/26 1304 DAIOHS USA, INC 2100 73500 COFFEE & TEA SUPPLI 0.00 1,041.01 1000 20086860 06/10/26 7078 DAPHNE WONG 5460 80050 BEG.TAP 05/5,12,19, 0.00 200.00 1000 20086860 06/10/26 7078 DAPHNE WONG 5460 80050 INT.TAP 05/5,12,19, 0.00 200.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 400.00
1000 20086862 06/10/26 2356 E.BAY ECONOMIC DEVE 101 1610 FY26-27 GLOBAL SUMM 0.00 1,200.00 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/15 57129300001 0.00 340.84 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/15 61045649319 0.00 908.88 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 2100 76000 06/12 57196200001 0.00 766.86 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/10 43803700001 0.00 322.68 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/15 48665713025 0.00 346.00 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 3000 76000 06/12 52912300001 0.00 616.10 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/12 43799400001 0.00 1,457.68 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 2100 76000 06/12 43805200001 0.00 4,635.37 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/10 51672900001 0.00 90.40 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/15 53371900001 0.00 765.72 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/15 02058455286 0.00 766.86 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 3000 76000 06/12 52953700001 0.00 340.84 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 11,358.23
1000 20086866 06/10/26 6406 EVERGREEN SERVICES 1280 80050 05/26 PROJECT MGMT 0.00 7,434.50 1000 20086867 06/10/26 6900 SOUNDTHINKING, INC 101 1610 FY26-27 SUBSCRIPTIO 0.00 5,708.00 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086868 06/10/26 6870 PAMELA G. PERRY 5460 80050 PEYOGA 05/5,12,19,2 0.00 200.00 1000 20086868 06/10/26 6870 PAMELA G. PERRY 5460 80050 YOGA 05/07,14,21,28 0.00 200.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 400.00
1000 20086869 06/10/26 7063 GAY LEE BIGMAN 5460 80050 BODYR 5/6,13,20,27 0.00 200.00 1000 20086869 06/10/26 7063 GAY LEE BIGMAN 5460 80050 AGELESS 5/6,13,20,2 0.00 200.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 400.00
1000 20086870 06/10/26 1045 KAREN BLUMENTHAL 4060 73500 DOGI DISPENSER 0.00 1,000.00 1000 20086871 06/10/26 5036 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN L 1400 80050 04/26 4300 SAN PABL 0.00 238.00 1000 20086871 06/10/26 5036 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN L 1400 80050 04/26 GEN. BUSINESS 0.00 816.00 1000 20086871 06/10/26 5036 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN L 1400 80050 04/26 RCD LOAN 0.00 340.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,394.00
1000 20086872 06/10/26 7284 GRANICUS LLC 101 1610 FY26-27AGENDA-WEBB 0.00 33,963.82 1000 20086873 06/10/26 4889 HELEN K. VAUGHN 5460 80050 LT.WGHT 05/5,12,14, 0.00 260.00 1000 20086873 06/10/26 4889 HELEN K. VAUGHN 5460 80050 ZUMBA 5/5,12,14,26, 0.00 325.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 585.00
1000 20086876 06/10/26 3379 ISABELITA PAPA 5460 80050 QIGONG 05/6,13,20,2 0.00 200.00 1000 20086877 06/10/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1725 80100 04/26 SUTTER HOSPIT 0.00 11,252.00 1000 20086878 06/10/26 7359 LANCASTER SAFETY CO 4060 84000 PW FLAGGER TRAINING 0.00 3,490.00 1000 20086880 06/10/26 6657 MOHAMED ALAOUI 4050 84150 DESIGN CITY CONF-TI 0.00 -7.20 1000 20086880 06/10/26 6657 MOHAMED ALAOUI 4050 84150 DESIGN CITY CONF-TI 0.00 -5.39 1000 20086880 06/10/26 6657 MOHAMED ALAOUI 4050 84150 DESIGN CITY CONT-UB 0.00 35.99 1000 20086880 06/10/26 6657 MOHAMED ALAOUI 4050 84150 DESIGN CITY CONF-UB 0.00 36.32 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 59.72
1000 20086882 06/10/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 05/11 8899208484-3 0.00 21.06 1000 20086882 06/10/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 05/11 5391386120-8 0.00 7.75 1000 20086882 06/10/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 06/08 8899208484-3 0.00 17.49 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 46.30
1000 20086883 06/10/26 7135 PHILLIP TOSTE 4050 84000 UBER TIPS TR ENGINE 0.00 -15.00 1000 20086883 06/10/26 7135 PHILLIP TOSTE 4050 84100 PER DIEM TR. ENGINE 0.00 387.00 1000 20086883 06/10/26 7135 PHILLIP TOSTE 4050 84000 UBER TRAFFIC ENGINE 0.00 67.97 1000 20086883 06/10/26 7135 PHILLIP TOSTE 4050 84000 UBER-TRAFFIC ENGINE 0.00 89.83 1000 20086883 06/10/26 7135 PHILLIP TOSTE 4050 84000 UBER-TIPS TR.ENGINE 0.00 -16.24 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 513.56
1000 20086884 06/10/26 2309 RANSOME COMPANY 101 2050 REF PMT ENC2025-003 0.00 789.00 1000 20086886 06/10/26 6607 SANDRA R. KISTLER 5460 80050 CYOGA 05/04,11,18 0.00 150.00 1000 20086886 06/10/26 6607 SANDRA R. KISTLER 5460 80050 TANGO 05/1,8,15,22, 0.00 500.00 1000 20086886 06/10/26 6607 SANDRA R. KISTLER 5460 80050 NIA 05/04,11,18 0.00 150.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 800.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086887 06/10/26 4669 PIXSCAN 5460 73000 BUS. CARDS-H.SORUS 0.00 95.03 1000 20086888 06/10/26 6863 ANDREW DAVIDSON 1250 80050 05/26 COUNCIL/ECCL 0.00 1,950.00 1000 20086888 06/10/26 6863 ANDREW DAVIDSON 1250 80050 05/26 INFOBOARD UPD 0.00 2,565.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,515.00
1000 20086890 06/10/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 2100 77150 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 0.00 336.75 1000 20086892 06/10/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2160 06/26 ADD'L LIFE&AD 0.00 422.25 1000 20086892 06/10/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2160 06/26 ACTIVE LIFE&A 0.00 1,303.05 1000 20086892 06/10/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2161 06/26 ACTIVE LTD PR 0.00 2,661.84 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,387.14
1000 20086893 06/10/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 150.00 1000 20086894 06/10/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 273.44 1000 20086895 06/10/26 4858 STEPHANIE J.C. PETE 5460 80050 ROSEN 05/7,14,21,28 0.00 200.00 1000 20086896 06/10/26 6759 STEVEN K. DEXHEIMER 2100 80500 B/GROUND INVESTIGAT 0.00 300.00 1000 20086897 06/10/26 4733 TLO, LLC 2100 77260 05/26 MTHLY ACCESS 0.00 194.40 1000 20086898 06/10/26 6710 TMI CONSULTING, INC 1600 84380 ERGO-EVALUATIONS 0.00 1,480.00 1000 20086901 06/10/26 7377 ZEMZEM TESFAYE 101 2012 REFUND RENTAL DEPOS 0.00 447.00 1000 20086902 06/17/26 5403 A.R. ORDEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086904 06/17/26 7060 ADELA G. MAYER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086905 06/17/26 6907 HEALTH & HUMAN RESO 101 1610 07/26 EMP ASSISTANC 0.00 223.56 1000 20086906 06/17/26 5955 AFAF E. KASIR 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086907 06/17/26 5466 AIDA M. CALICA 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086908 06/17/26 7380 ALI AHMADZADEH 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086909 06/17/26 5501 ALTON WILLIAMS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086910 06/17/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1280 73000 CREDIT ON SUPPLIES 0.00 -182.33 1000 20086910 06/17/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1280 73000 4TBHARDDISK 0.00 487.02 1000 20086910 06/17/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1280 73000 CREDIT ON SUPPLIES 0.00 -152.49 1000 20086910 06/17/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1200 73000 YEALINK WH62 0.00 187.84 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 340.04
1000 20086911 06/17/26 6931 ANN KEEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086912 06/17/26 6177 ANNE BYRNE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086914 06/17/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 2,024.61 1000 20086915 06/17/26 1167 ASHBY LUMBER 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 56.10 1000 20086916 06/17/26 1421 AT&T 2100 76050 5/01-5/31 939108495 0.00 200.90 1000 20086917 06/17/26 5727 BARBARA J. WITNEY 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086918 06/17/26 5467 BARBARA K. KOCHIOVE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086919 06/17/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1600 82000 AB 2561 06-02-2026 0.00 538.56 1000 20086919 06/17/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1700 82000 HSE ELEMENT AMEND 0.00 648.00 1000 20086919 06/17/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1250 82000 ORDINANCE 26-004 0.00 305.28 1000 20086919 06/17/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1250 82000 ORDINANCE 26-003 0.00 383.04 1000 20086919 06/17/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1250 82000 AGENDA POSTINGS 0.00 264.96 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,139.84
1000 20086921 06/17/26 5751 BEVERLY A. ESTES 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086922 06/17/26 5469 BIRGITTA ALARCON 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086923 06/17/26 5560 BLAISDELL & SONGEY, 1900 73500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 290.78 1000 20086923 06/17/26 5560 BLAISDELL & SONGEY, 1900 73500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 348.94 1000 20086923 06/17/26 5560 BLAISDELL & SONGEY, 1800 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 75.94 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 715.66
1000 20086924 06/17/26 7223 CAROLINA VASQUEZ DE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086925 06/17/26 5759 CHARLES JEW 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086926 06/17/26 6893 CHARLINE BAYON SIMM 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086927 06/17/26 5728 CHERYL W. STERLING 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086928 06/17/26 1344 CHEVRON WITH TECHRO 2200 73550 05/07-06/06 FUEL CH 0.00 4,688.54 1000 20086929 06/17/26 1186 CITY OF BERKELEY 2200 88250 FY25-26 ANIMAL CARE 0.00 88,516.00 1000 20086930 06/17/26 5471 WOODROW T. CLINT 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086931 06/17/26 5472 CONNIE M. WILLIAMS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086932 06/17/26 5729 CORAZON KLEIN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086933 06/17/26 1565 CRIME SCENE CLEANER 2200 80050 BIOHAZARD CLEANP 0.00 130.00 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012616 0.00 74.96 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012650 0.00 65.95 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012587 0.00 39.27 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012643 0.00 45.91 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012553 0.00 55.56 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012579 0.00 114.90 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012529 0.00 121.30 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012498 0.00 157.07 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012569 0.00 173.96 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012499 0.00 197.22 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012515 0.00 357.96 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012542 0.00 57.60 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012593 0.00 68.65 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012663 0.00 183.93 1000 20086935 06/17/26 7381 DANIEL CHEVALIER 5420 71040 REPLACE CK 10012656 0.00 239.72 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,953.96
1000 20086936 06/17/26 5730 DARLENE E. GALL 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086937 06/17/26 6897 DAVID GROSSMAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086938 06/17/26 5394 DEBRA AOKI 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086940 06/17/26 1221 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTI 2100 80620 05/26 FINGERPRINTIN 0.00 196.00 1000 20086941 06/17/26 6402 DONNA HACKER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086942 06/17/26 5704 DOROTHY RADCLIFFE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086943 06/17/26 6587 DOUGLAS G. WONG 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086944 06/17/26 5475 E. T. KING 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/12 53942800001 0.00 152.28 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 05/27 12835200737 0.00 203.40 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 05/29 01168658062 0.00 483.52 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/22 56106600001 0.00 936.12 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/22 53191800001 0.00 2,640.12 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/22 43809100001 0.00 884.26 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/11 73230829512 0.00 524.26 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/12 43804900001 0.00 305.64 1000 20086945 06/17/26 1134 EBMUD 4060 76000 06/12 32385000001 0.00 152.28 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 6,281.88
1000 20086947 06/17/26 5732 EDWARD TANOVITZ 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086948 06/17/26 5956 ELISE G. HIGGINS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086949 06/17/26 6884 ERNA L. ANDRE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086950 06/17/26 5734 FARHAD MOASSER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086951 06/17/26 5477 FRANCES M. CHIAPPET 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086952 06/17/26 6727 GAYE YING 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086953 06/17/26 5424 GILLIAN BELCHER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086954 06/17/26 3701 GLASHAUS OWNERS ASS 4065 77000 ANN. PARKING GARAGE 0.00 3,605.34 1000 20086955 06/17/26 1045 KAREN BLUMENTHAL 4060 73500 DOG ROLL BAG SUPPLI 0.00 1,854.30 1000 20086956 06/17/26 1581 GRAINGER 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 18.57 1000 20086956 06/17/26 1581 GRAINGER 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 143.12 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 161.69
1000 20086957 06/17/26 5478 GUNNAR W. NIEMI 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086958 06/17/26 5735 GWEN F. SOUZA 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086959 06/17/26 6885 HANNAH LAM 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086960 06/17/26 6592 HARLEY EDWARD JENSE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086961 06/17/26 6775 HINDERLITER, DE LLA 1500 80050 04/26 NEW ACCOUNTS 0.00 545.91 1000 20086961 06/17/26 6775 HINDERLITER, DE LLA 1500 80050 04/26 COLLECTION FE 0.00 16,136.86 1000 20086961 06/17/26 6775 HINDERLITER, DE LLA 1500 80050 04/26 AUDIT PAYMENT 0.00 17,736.08 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34,418.85
1000 20086962 06/17/26 1437 IEDA 1900 80050 06/26 LABOR RELATIO 0.00 2,819.27 1000 20086965 06/17/26 7357 IRRIGATION EQUIPMEN 4060 73515 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 0.00 48.51 1000 20086966 06/17/26 5958 JAMES DENNIS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086967 06/17/26 5957 JAMES Y. PANN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086968 06/17/26 6886 JANE A. GOODWIN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 211.74 1000 20086969 06/17/26 5736 JESSICA BERNARD 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086970 06/17/26 5970 JIRI DOKLADAL 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086971 06/17/26 7049 JOHN WILLIAM LUND 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086972 06/17/26 5959 JOSEPH COHEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086973 06/17/26 1057 JOSEPH LUTZ 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086974 06/17/26 6588 JOSEPHINE MAY LING 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086975 06/17/26 5481 JOYCE S. LENG 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086976 06/17/26 6403 JUDITH A. MASON 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086977 06/17/26 2650 JULIA S. PALMA 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086978 06/17/26 5483 KATHERINE L. ARMSTR 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086979 06/17/26 7086 KATHLEEN L. SMITH 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086980 06/17/26 5484 KEIKO WATABE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086981 06/17/26 5737 KIMBERLY GRACE HOPP 1900 88030 FDY25-26 PBID REBAT 0.00 148.28 1000 20086982 06/17/26 5485 LEO PAUL GERHARDT 1900 88030 GY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086983 06/17/26 5978 LESLIE MARK ZABLEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086984 06/17/26 6360 LEXISNEXIS CLAIMS S 2100 77260 05 26 ONLNE REPORTI 0.00 860.53 1000 20086985 06/17/26 5761 LI FANG CHEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086986 06/17/26 7220 LILLIAN H. SCHROTH 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086987 06/17/26 5738 LOIS Y. CHAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086988 06/17/26 5961 LUCY PERDICHIZZI 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086989 06/17/26 5426 LYNNE TURNER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20086990 06/17/26 5503 MAGDA SILBERMAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086991 06/17/26 5490 MARIE E. KELLER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086992 06/17/26 7046 MARINA TSANG 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086993 06/17/26 6125 MARK A CLEMENTI 2100 80500 PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM 0.00 844.00 1000 20086994 06/17/26 5524 MARK ZIMMERMAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086995 06/17/26 6906 MARTHA BIRCH 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086996 06/17/26 5489 MARY E. FARRELL 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086997 06/17/26 5488 MARY HELENE FARMER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20086999 06/17/26 7188 PAMELA MENDELSOHN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 8977352672-1 0.00 17.37 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 6371641442-8 0.00 17.57 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 9133041096-9 0.00 18.98 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 5800754046-9 0.00 20.76 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 0146442665-7 0.00 35.69 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 0104004435-4 0.00 50.84 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 7051879980-7 0.00 7.95 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 3000 76000 06/15 9217951859-9 0.00 1,308.30 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 5460 76000 06/08 7341249247-9 0.00 259.13 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 4569881751-2 0.00 96.42 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 3000 76000 06/08 9979003803-0 0.00 138.95 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 6399329769-4 0.00 209.60 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/12 2278915408-9 0.00 495.07 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 0577169108-5 0.00 52.80 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/15 4697514595-7 0.00 307.36 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 06/15 5642974816-5 0.00 316.55 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 1900 76000 06/08 9132683071-7 0.00 6,921.70 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 8976252125-3 0.00 55.17 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 3000 76000 06/15 5551754916-2 0.00 1,356.36 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 7550015236-0 0.00 15.54 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 06/15 0782731263-3 0.00 28.94 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 06/15 4324841721-4 0.00 32.26 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 1927210900-0 0.00 33.34 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76150 06/08 6440996433-1 0.00 1,200.42 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4060 76000 06/15 2804377241-8 0.00 1,706.02 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 14,703.09
1000 20087003 06/17/26 7379 PLANT CONSTRUCTION 4070 58780 REFUND ENC2000-82 0.00 316.50 1000 20087003 06/17/26 7379 PLANT CONSTRUCTION 101 2050 R3FUND ENC2024-24 0.00 1,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,316.50
1000 20087004 06/17/26 6877 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SY 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 513.63 1000 20087004 06/17/26 6877 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SY 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 1,805.39 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,319.02
1000 20087005 06/17/26 5493 ROBERT PICKENS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087006 06/17/26 4475 RONALD FREUND 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087007 06/17/26 5496 SABINA UBELL 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087008 06/17/26 5500 WILLIAM L. DISKEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20087009 06/17/26 6791 SCA OF CA, LLC 4060 77400 05/26 STREET SWEEPI 0.00 9,020.00 1000 20087010 06/17/26 7053 BWNVT MOTORS, INC 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 3,707.28 1000 20087011 06/17/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1800 82050 PAPER SHREDDING 0.00 80.01 1000 20087011 06/17/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1500 82050 PAPER SHREDDING 0.00 80.01 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 160.02
1000 20087012 06/17/26 6362 SONNY LAU 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087013 06/17/26 4706 STAR ROOTER & PLUMB 101 2080 REFUND PSL2025-0007 0.00 1,133.00 1000 20087013 06/17/26 4706 STAR ROOTER & PLUMB 4070 58780 REFUND PSL2025-0007 0.00 681.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,814.00
1000 20087014 06/17/26 6589 STEPHEN FUNG 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087015 06/17/26 5962 STEVE A. CENTANNE 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20087016 06/17/26 5495 SUSAN L. SMITH 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087017 06/17/26 6181 SUSAN PENNER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087018 06/17/26 7221 TERRI LONG 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087019 06/17/26 2673 THE LEW EDWARDS GRO 1500 80050 04/26 PROFESSIONAL 0.00 6,750.00 1000 20087019 06/17/26 2673 THE LEW EDWARDS GRO 1500 80050 03/26 PROFESSIONAL 0.00 6,750.00 1000 20087019 06/17/26 2673 THE LEW EDWARDS GRO 1500 80050 05/26 PROFESSIONAL 0.00 6,750.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 20,250.00
1000 20087021 06/17/26 2601 THOMSON REUTERS 1400 77260 06/26 ONLINE S/WARE 0.00 251.98 1000 20087022 06/17/26 7222 TIANA JENKINS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 105.86 1000 20087023 06/17/26 6074 TIPLADA KUNAKEMAKOR 1900 80050 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087024 06/17/26 1639 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFF 1800 80050 06/25 SECURE CIP/FD 0.00 7,500.00 1000 20087025 06/17/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 FY25-26 CAL-ID NETW 0.00 8,365.00 1000 20087027 06/17/26 6812 VIRGINIA KENERY 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087028 06/17/26 1121 VISION SERVICE PLAN 101 2164 06/26 ACTIVE PREMIU 0.00 2,977.00 1000 20087029 06/17/26 7062 SILVIA NAKKACH KNAP 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087030 06/17/26 4951 WALT WATMAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087031 06/17/26 7134 BRANDON WHITNEY 1730 87210 GRAFFITTI 3840 SPA 0.00 285.00 1000 20087031 06/17/26 7134 BRANDON WHITNEY 1730 87210 GRAFFITTI 1800 POWE 0.00 964.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,249.00
1000 20087032 06/17/26 5499 WILLIAM R. LEBEN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087033 06/17/26 5776 WILLIAM WEBBER 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087034 06/17/26 1462 WITMER-TYSON IMPORT 2200 88220 04/06 MTHLY K-9 MAI 0.00 900.00 1000 20087034 06/17/26 1462 WITMER-TYSON IMPORT 2200 88220 03/26 MTHLY K-9 MAI 0.00 1,424.00 1000 20087034 06/17/26 1462 WITMER-TYSON IMPORT 2200 88220 05/26 MTHLY K-9 MAI 0.00 1,928.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,252.00
1000 20087035 06/17/26 2939 NICHOLAS SEBASTIAN 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087037 06/24/26 7383 ALBERTA KEAKEALANI 5460 73500 EVENT PERFORMANCE 0.00 200.00 1000 20087038 06/24/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1900 73500 COFFEE & TEA SUPPLI 0.00 81.48 1000 20087038 06/24/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1500 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 42.51 1000 20087038 06/24/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1900 73500 COFFEE & TEA SUPPLI 0.00 62.47 1000 20087038 06/24/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 4050 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 44.19 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 230.65
1000 20087039 06/24/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4150 FSA-DEPCAR 0.00 640.52 1000 20087039 06/24/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4160 SUPP INSUR 0.00 275.23 1000 20087039 06/24/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4100 FSA-HLTHCR 0.00 1,813.35 1000 20087039 06/24/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4170 SUPP INSUR 0.00 1,930.24 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,659.34
1000 20087040 06/24/26 7235 ANDREA ARRIAGA 1400 84150 FUEL CHGS LEAGUE CI 0.00 19.24 1000 20087043 06/24/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 179.42 1000 20087044 06/24/26 1007 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPE 1700 73150 DEV. IMPACT FEES 0.00 550.08 1000 20087046 06/24/26 1023 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFO 101 2137 06/18 EPOA LTD 0.00 736.00 1000 20087047 06/24/26 1633 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXI 2100 80620 04/14 LAB SERVICES 0.00 257.00 1000 20087047 06/24/26 1633 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXI 2100 80620 05/12 LAB SERVICES 0.00 44.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 301.00
1000 20087049 06/24/26 6754 CHANDLER ASSET MANA 1500 80050 05/26 INVESTMENT MG 0.00 6,766.92 1000 20087050 06/24/26 3237 COMCAST 1900 88350 6/10 81554004104091 0.00 71.33 1000 20087052 06/24/26 4543 STOMMEL, INC 2200 77100 LABOR EQUIP REMOVAL 0.00 1,960.00 1000 20087052 06/24/26 4543 STOMMEL, INC 2200 77100 LESS O/PYMT SI13257 0.00 -840.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,120.00
1000 20087055 06/24/26 6868 E&J TRUCK AND EQUIP 4060 77100 PW TRUCK MAINTENANC 0.00 518.16 1000 20087056 06/24/26 1134 EBMUD 1900 76000 06/22 12835200001 0.00 756.38 1000 20087057 06/24/26 7382 ELAINE CARNEY 101 2012 REF SECURITY DEPOSI 0.00 500.00 1000 20087060 06/24/26 5036 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN L 1400 80050 05/26 GEN. BUSINESS 0.00 544.00 1000 20087063 06/24/26 2773 HEAD OVER HEELS GYM 5450 80050 2026 SPRING CLASSES 0.00 10,125.00 1000 20087065 06/24/26 1437 IEDA 1900 80050 05/26 LABOR RELATIO 0.00 2,819.27 1000 20087067 06/24/26 7367 JEFF JELSMA 1250 82100 REIMB JUNE BPAC MTG 0.00 32.11 1000 20087067 06/24/26 7367 JEFF JELSMA 1250 82100 REIMB MAY BPAC MTG 0.00 32.69 1000 20087067 06/24/26 7367 JEFF JELSMA 1250 82100 REIMB APRIL BPAC MT 0.00 14.07 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 78.87
1000 20087070 06/24/26 1574 MCLAUGHLIN COFFEE C 1900 73500 COFFEE & TEA SUPPLI 0.00 183.00 1000 20087072 06/24/26 6659 ANDREA M. MORELAND 2100 80500 PRE EMPLOYMENT B/G 0.00 1,800.00 1000 20087073 06/24/26 2698 PACIFIC PRINT RESOU 1800 82100 MINIUM WAGE POSTERS 0.00 3,920.91 1000 20087074 06/24/26 1345 PARS 2100 71420 04/31 EPOA REP FEES 0.00 1,500.00 1000 20087076 06/24/26 3769 PETS PARTNERSHIP 2200 80050 ER ANIMAL CARE 0.00 400.00 1000 20087077 06/24/26 1149 PITNEY BOWES, INC 1900 73150 POSTAGE MACHINE SUP 0.00 177.92 1000 20087079 06/24/26 6813 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT 1500 80050 05/26 FIN CONTRACT 0.00 80.70 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 11
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087080 06/24/26 6877 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SY 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 820.88 1000 20087081 06/24/26 2123 SANTA ROSA JUNIOR C 2100 84000 5/5-5/7 M.LEE TR.MG 0.00 68.50 1000 20087082 06/24/26 7053 BWNVT MOTORS, INC 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 300.00 1000 20087083 06/24/26 6101 SF TIRE AND SERVICE 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINT & TIR 0.00 1,270.85 1000 20087085 06/24/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 ONE TIME DEPT PURGE 0.00 1,152.06 1000 20087085 06/24/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 CI.CLERK REGULAR TO 0.00 344.48 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,496.54
1000 20087086 06/24/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 273.44 1000 20087087 06/24/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 150.00 1000 20087089 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 76050 05/26 NETWORK SVCS 0.00 3,858.56 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 280.00 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 167.00 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 307.00 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 327.00 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 327.00 1000 20087090 06/24/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2100 80620 05/26 LAB SERVICES 0.00 327.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,735.00
1000 20087091 06/24/26 6674 U. S. BANK 1500 80380 JAN-MAR'26 BANKING 0.00 2,252.57 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 ALCO CREDIT TRAININ 0.00 -218.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1400 84150 FOXRENT CAR - CREDI 0.00 -150.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS CREDIT 0.00 -59.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 73440 INSTACART ASP PROG 0.00 -7.49 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5000 73000 APPLE PHONE STORAGE 0.00 0.99 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1200 84150 ERACTOLL BRIDGE TOL 0.00 5.70 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5460 84000 CPRS STAFF TRAINING 0.00 10.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 SAFEWAY PW TEAM BLD 0.00 11.03 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 EV-PLUS.COM FUEL 0.00 15.35 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 73500 AMAZON DEPT SUPPLY 0.00 18.66 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 73440 INSTACART ASP PROG 0.00 23.96 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 73440 SAFEWAY ASP PROG 0.00 23.97 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1200 84150 ENTERPRISE LCC MTG 0.00 25.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 77100 AUTO ZONE AUTO MAIN 0.00 33.04 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73350 AMZON SAFETY SUPPLY 0.00 34.80 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1400 84150 SFO PARKING LCC CON 0.00 39.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1250 73600 TARGET COUNCIL DINN 0.00 48.02 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 80050 FASTRAK BRIDGE TOLL 0.00 65.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1900 88500 B/AREA N/P LGL NOTI 0.00 72.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 88220 PET FOOD EXPRESS K9 0.00 77.63 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 7-ELEVEN FUEL CHGS 0.00 82.98 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73350 AMAZON SAFETY SUPPL 0.00 87.24 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 12
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 73440 INSTACART ASP PROG 0.00 288.10 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 AMPM OAKLEY FUEL CH 0.00 298.75 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1400 84150 FOXRENT LCC CONF 0.00 300.45 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 73500 COSTCO DEPT SUPPLIE 0.00 302.78 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 84100 CALPELRA PSHRA M/S 0.00 390.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 88220 RADIOTRONICS K9 SUP 0.00 476.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 HAMPTON INN TRAININ 0.00 496.41 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 82100 4IMPRINT COMM O/REA 0.00 528.58 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 HAMPTON INN TRAININ 0.00 537.87 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1400 84150 HILTON LAU LCC CONF 0.00 574.54 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 LAKE NATOMA TRAININ 0.00 675.16 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 HYATT TOSTE FUNDAME 0.00 845.90 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 84000 CALPERS TRAINING CO 0.00 875.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1700 84150 MARRIOTT-APA CONF 0.00 1,201.76 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 73500 I2D W/S CANOPY PART 0.00 38.70 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5420 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5420 73500 H/DEP TWO-WAY RADIO 0.00 171.26 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 88220 NUTRISOURCE K-9 FO 0.00 348.16 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 CR RIVERIA TRAINING 0.00 -58.35 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 LAKE NATOMA TRAININ 0.00 506.37 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 SHELL OIL FUEL CHGS 0.00 72.11 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1900 73500 VISTAPOINT SP POSTE 0.00 563.53 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4060 84000 ROUND TABLE PW OSHA 0.00 151.67 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 87080 BEAR CLAW EMP RECOG 0.00 869.65 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 87080 COSTCO EMP RECOG 0.00 156.51 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1700 84150 THRIVANCE CONF CHUN 0.00 35.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5420 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 87080 TARGET EMP RECOG 0.00 114.73 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 73500 AMAZON DEPT SUPPLY 0.00 139.80 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 COSTOC/SHELL FUEL C 0.00 146.80 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1730 73000 STAPLES OFFICE SUPP 0.00 166.63 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 ALCO SHERIFF TRAINI 0.00 207.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1250 84000 CMCA TRAINING SAYAR 0.00 250.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 HILTON JEFF.J NACTO 0.00 1,167.36 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1700 84150 THRIVANCE CONF OAKS 0.00 35.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 SAFEWAY PW TEAM BLD 0.00 36.06 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 73000 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPL 0.00 36.45 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 SQ PRIMALTRAINING C 0.00 -750.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 84000 CPRS STAFF TRAINING 0.00 20.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 84150 S/P HOTEL CALGOVHR 0.00 84.75 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73350 AMAZON SAFETY SUPPL 0.00 99.41 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1600 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 84000 CPRS STAFF TRAINING 0.00 110.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1250 73600 THEBUTCHER COUNCIL 0.00 36.69 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 128.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 73440 LAS MONTANAS ASP PR 0.00 66.56 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMERTRICS LIVESCA 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4060 84000 IKES PW MAINT OSHA 0.00 168.74 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 GB B/A CHAP GI/BUTT 0.00 256.75 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1800 73100 MAILCHIMP EMAIL LIS 0.00 230.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 256.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 CHEVRON L/MORE FUEL 0.00 190.12 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 13
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 192.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5450 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 128.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 S/WEST FUNDAMENTALS 0.00 373.80 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1250 73600 CHIPOLTE COUNCIL ME 0.00 426.53 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 HILTON NACTO CONF 0.00 875.52 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1400 84150 UNITED LNE LCC CONF 0.00 682.50 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 4050 84150 LOS CANTAR0S PW LUN 0.00 510.23 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1280 73000 NEW EGG HARD DRIVE 0.00 442.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 RESIDENCE INN TRAIN 0.00 754.63 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 73500 H/DEPOT HARDWARE 0.00 17.55 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 73500 CANVA MARKETING 0.00 56.49 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2200 73550 EV-PLUS.COM FUEL CH 0.00 23.27 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 64.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 73500 H/DEPOT GLOVES 0.00 14.82 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 80050 BIOMETRICS LIVESCAN 0.00 192.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5430 80050 BIOMETRICS CREDIT 0.00 -59.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 TARGET SUPPLIES 0.00 7.59 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 2100 84000 ALCO SHERIFF SVC FE 0.00 5.15 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 1200 84150 ERACTOLL BRIDGE TOL 0.00 13.45 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 19,123.17
1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 1500 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 592.39 1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 4060 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 296.20 1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 2100 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 1,184.80 1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 5460 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 296.20 1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 5450 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 296.20 1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 1900 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 1,777.20 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,442.99
1000 20087099 06/24/26 4987 URBAN PLANNING PART 1725 80050 04/26 CEQA SUTTER 0.00 25,760.50 1000 20087102 06/24/26 2569 WEST COAST ARBORIST 4060 77520 05/16-05/31 TREE SV 0.00 5,821.00 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80305 01/26 REIMB MILEAGE 0.00 883.78 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80305 02/26 REIMB MILEAGE 0.00 917.13 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80305 04/26 REIMB MILEAGE 0.00 1,317.33 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80045 02/26 IN HSE COUNTE 0.00 4,017.20 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80050 01/26 INTERIM CBO S 0.00 4,500.00 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80050 02/26 IN HSE PLAN R 0.00 6,625.48 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80045 04/26 IN HSE COUNTE 0.00 8,034.40 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80050 01/26 IN HSE PLAN R 0.00 8,265.75 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80050 04/26 IN HSE PLAN R 0.00 10,467.38 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80480 04/26 BLDG PL REV W 0.00 21,148.63 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80305 03/26 REIMB MILEAGE 0.00 967.15 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80045 01/26 IN HSE COUNTE 0.00 4,017.20 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80045 03/26 IN HSE COUNTE 0.00 1,606.88 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80480 03/26 BLDG PL REV W 0.00 15,156.56 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80480 02/26 BLDG PL REV W 0.00 18,612.99 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80490 04/26 FIELD INSPECT 0.00 33,536.80 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80490 03/26 FIELD INSPECT 0.00 33,536.80 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80480 01/26 BLDG PL REV W 0.00 6,518.26 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80050 03/26 IN HSE PLAN R 0.00 10,688.83 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 14
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80490 02/26 FIELD INSPECT 0.00 28,963.60 1000 20087103 06/24/26 2363 WEST COAST CODE CON 1730 80490 01/26 FIELD INSPECT 0.00 30,488.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 250,270.15
1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5460 73000 SR.CTR OFFICE SUPPL 0.00 39.39 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1900 73500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 90.23 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1250 82050 PRINTING SUPPLIES 0.00 7.72 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5420 73500 AQUATICS SUPPLIES 0.00 134.79 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5450 73440 AFTER SCHOOL SUPPLY 0.00 114.26 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1400 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 8.07 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5460 73500 VETERANS DAY SUPPLI 0.00 28.70 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5000 73000 COMM. SVCS SUPPLIES 0.00 29.32 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1900 73500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 139.29 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5480 73500 OPERATING SUPPLIES 0.00 457.30 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1100 84200 MAYORS CONFERENCE 0.00 325.50 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1400 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 74.03 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1250 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 99.44 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1600 87080 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITIO 0.00 101.32 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5460 73000 SR.CTR OPERATING 0.00 104.56 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5430 73500 FACILITY OPERATING 0.00 156.14 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5460 73000 SR CTR OFFICE SUPPL 0.00 25.72 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1200 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 28.62 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1250 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 44.18 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5410 73500 SPECIAL EVENTS SUPP 0.00 546.03 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5450 73440 AFTER SCHOOL SUPPLY 0.00 744.99 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5420 73500 AQUATICS SUPPLIES 0.00 192.15 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5460 73500 SR.CTR FALL EVENTS 0.00 420.28 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1200 73000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 30.03 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 1250 73600 FOOD SUPPLIES 0.00 11.02 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,953.08
1000 20087107 06/30/26 6841 APRIL FORAN 1250 84000 PER DIEM MMC TRAINI 0.00 2,201.47 1000 20087108 06/30/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 264.21 1000 20087108 06/30/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 873.96 1000 20087108 06/30/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 312.19 1000 20087108 06/30/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 254.94 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,705.30
1000 20087109 06/30/26 1421 AT&T 2100 76050 5/12-6/11 939108071 0.00 416.82 1000 20087109 06/30/26 1421 AT&T 2100 76050 4/12-5/11 939108071 0.00 421.35 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 838.17
1000 20087110 06/30/26 1421 AT&T 2100 76050 6/11-7/10 100127627 0.00 1.40 1000 20087111 06/30/26 5848 AXON ENTERPRISE, IN 2200 73350 EMPD TASERS 0.00 11,171.73 1000 20087112 06/30/26 7391 AYANA SELLASSIE 101 2050 REFUND ENC2026-0047 0.00 1,000.00 1000 20087114 06/30/26 5560 BLAISDELL & SONGEY, 2100 73500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 91.81 1000 20087115 06/30/26 5290 PRIMO BRANDS 2100 73500 05/13-06/12 WATER S 0.00 284.69 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 15
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087117 06/30/26 1344 CHEVRON WITH TECHRO 4060 73515 05/07-06/06 FUEL CH 0.00 146.72 1000 20087117 06/30/26 1344 CHEVRON WITH TECHRO 4060 73515 04/07-05/06 FUEL CH 0.00 274.93 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 421.65
1000 20087119 06/30/26 3237 COMCAST 2100 76050 7/07 81554004100280 0.00 317.06 1000 20087120 06/30/26 1706 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2100 84000 ACADEMY-HAVEL/SIMON 0.00 10,910.00 1000 20087123 06/30/26 1581 GRAINGER 2100 73500 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES 0.00 122.95 1000 20087126 06/30/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1400 80050 05/26 LAND USE CEQA 0.00 266.00 1000 20087126 06/30/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1400 80050 05/26 ATTORNEY PROF 0.00 5,241.00 1000 20087126 06/30/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1400 80050 05/26 RADAR V CITY 0.00 4,653.95 1000 20087126 06/30/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1400 80050 05/26 BUS.LICENSE T 0.00 2,242.00 1000 20087126 06/30/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1400 80050 05/26 PUBWKS CONTRA 0.00 3,230.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 15,632.95
1000 20087127 06/30/26 7143 KARI VADNAIS 1250 82100 REIMB PAC DINNER 0.00 65.26 1000 20087129 06/30/26 1074 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & 1400 80050 05/26 EM010-00052 0.00 1,401.50 1000 20087129 06/30/26 1074 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & 1400 80050 05/26 GEN. BUSINESS 0.00 337.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,738.50
1000 20087131 06/30/26 7165 MUNISERVICES, LLC 1500 80360 Q4 SUTA QTR END 12/ 0.00 497.73 1000 20087132 06/30/26 7358 NICHOLAS CALONGE 2100 84000 PER DIEM CAL CHIEF 0.00 56.16 1000 20087132 06/30/26 7358 NICHOLAS CALONGE 2100 84000 PER DIEM CAL CHIEF 0.00 101.31 1000 20087132 06/30/26 7358 NICHOLAS CALONGE 2100 84000 PER DIEM CAL CHIEF 0.00 85.53 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 243.00
1000 20087135 06/30/26 7044 PUBLIC SAFETY FAMIL 2100 80050 05/26 PD WELLNESS P 0.00 1,700.00 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5470 80380 03/26 PROCESSING FE 0.00 718.37 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5440 80380 03/26 PROCESSING FE 0.00 718.37 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5460 80380 03/26 PROCESSING FE 0.00 718.37 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5420 80380 03/26 PROCESSING FE 0.00 718.38 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5000 77260 03/26 TECHNOLOGY FE 0.00 3,537.33 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5000 77260 REG S/WARE APR-JUN' 0.00 5,000.00 1000 20087136 06/30/26 7325 REC TECHNOLOGIES, I 5430 80380 03/26 PROCESSING FE 0.00 718.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 12,129.20
1000 20087137 06/30/26 3044 RICHARD B LEE 2100 84000 PER DIEM POST MGMT 0.00 414.00 1000 20087137 06/30/26 3044 RICHARD B LEE 2100 84000 PER DIEM POST MGMT 0.00 414.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 828.00
1000 20087138 06/30/26 6877 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SY 4060 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 2,295.91 1000 20087141 06/30/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 REPLACE CK 20086789 0.00 -330.88 1000 20087141 06/30/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 2100 77150 REPLACE CK 20086789 0.00 301.51 1000 20087141 06/30/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 1250 80050 REPLACE CK 20086789 0.00 661.76 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 632.39
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 16
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087142 06/30/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 2100 77150 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 0.00 337.94 1000 20087143 06/30/26 5944 MOTORRAD, LLC 2200 77100 M/CYCLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 1,768.57 1000 20087144 06/30/26 1165 TREASURER OF ALAMED 2200 86300 05/26 BOOKING FEES 0.00 1,030.00 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1500 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 74.88 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 4060 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 374.40 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1400 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 37.44 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1200 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 37.44 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 5000 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 599.04 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 2100 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 2,774.38 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 4050 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 226.35 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1730 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 112.32 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1800 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 37.44 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 1250 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 37.44 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,311.13
1000 20087146 06/30/26 7390 VICTORIA JENNINGS 1900 88030 FY25-26 PBID REBATE 0.00 148.28 1000 20087147 06/30/26 6227 SHELL FLEET PLUS 2200 73550 05/24-06/23 FUEL CH 0.00 4,546.79 1000 20087148 07/08/26 1335 ADAMSON POLICE PROD 2200 73450 POLICE AMMUNITION 0.00 4,618.79 1000 20087149 07/08/26 1031 ALL MOBILE DETAILS 2200 77100 FLWASH 6/3,10,18,24 0.00 1,995.00 1000 20087150 07/08/26 1163 ALPINE-PINNACLE 2200 73350 BLACKSEAL GLOVES 0.00 2,688.80 1000 20087151 07/08/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4160 SUPP INSUR 0.00 275.23 1000 20087151 07/08/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4150 FSA-DEPCAR 0.00 640.52 1000 20087151 07/08/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4170 SUPP INSUR 0.00 1,930.24 1000 20087151 07/08/26 6529 AMERICAN FIDELITY A 101 2172 DED:4100 FSA-HLTHCR 0.00 1,813.35 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,659.34
1000 20087153 07/08/26 7081 ARGONAUT INDUSTRIES 2200 77100 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 338.04 1000 20087154 07/08/26 4618 ATHLETIC PLAYGROUND 5450 80050 SPRING 2026 CLASSES 0.00 6,422.00 1000 20087156 07/08/26 6829 BAY AREA PL SERVICE 2100 80620 ON CALL LAB SERVICE 0.00 2,250.00 1000 20087158 07/08/26 3237 COMCAST 1100 76050 7/15 81554004100035 0.00 156.58 1000 20087160 07/08/26 1304 DAIOHS USA, INC 2100 73500 06/26 MACHINE RENTA 0.00 68.25 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 11/29 HORTON S/LIGH 0.00 21.40 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 04/26 TR SIGNAL XTR 0.00 85.59 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 05/26 TR SIGNAL XTR 0.00 1,253.99 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 04/26 ST LIGHT XTRA 0.00 183.38 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 04/26 ST LIGHT MAIN 0.00 508.91 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 03/18 PD EV CHARGER 0.00 85.59 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 05/26 ST LIGHT XTRA 0.00 150.44 CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 17
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 101 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 05/26 TR SIGNAL MAI 0.00 1,139.60 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 4060 77340 05/26 ST LIGHT MAIN 0.00 508.91 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,937.81
1000 20087162 07/08/26 1134 EBMUD 1900 76000 07/13 55015100001 0.00 766.86 1000 20087162 07/08/26 1134 EBMUD 1900 76000 07/09 55017600001 0.00 422.68 1000 20087162 07/08/26 1134 EBMUD 1900 76000 07/13 55018200001 0.00 372.03 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,561.57
1000 20087163 07/08/26 5144 EOA, INC 4050 77060 4/01-5/31 STORMWATE 0.00 855.00 1000 20087164 07/08/26 7054 FISHNETS & FILM, IN 5460 73500 6/26 DRAG BINGO HOS 0.00 150.00 1000 20087167 07/08/26 5133 JARVIS FAY LLP 1725 80100 05/26 SUTTER HOSPIT 0.00 1,309.50 1000 20087168 07/08/26 1074 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & 1600 80050 05/26 BENEFITS ADVI 0.00 2,910.50 1000 20087170 07/08/26 5678 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, 1600 77260 7/26-6/27 S/W RENEW 0.00 17,002.44 1000 20087173 07/08/26 1148 PG&E 2100 76000 07/06 0145671099-3 0.00 32,242.14 1000 20087177 07/08/26 6654 STERICYCLE, INC 2100 77150 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 0.00 354.85 1000 20087178 07/08/26 5686 EDWARD DORSANEO 1600 80500 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAM 0.00 680.00 1000 20087179 07/08/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2161 07/26 ACTIVE LTD PR 0.00 2,636.77 1000 20087179 07/08/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2160 07/26 ADD'L LIFE AD 0.00 422.25 1000 20087179 07/08/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 101 2160 07/26 ACTIVE LIFE A 0.00 1,292.76 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,351.78
1000 20087180 07/08/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 273.44 1000 20087181 07/08/26 1321 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 101 2138 0.00 150.00 1000 20087183 07/08/26 2569 WEST COAST ARBORIST 4060 77520 6/01-6/15 TREE MAIN 0.00 10,270.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 881,675.74
TOTAL FUND 0.00 881,675.74
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 18
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 202 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086850 06/10/26 7018 510MEDIA LLC 202 82000 PH4 WEB REFINEMENT 0.00 1,100.00 1000 20086885 06/10/26 1556 ALBERT REPOLA 202 88040 BUSINESS LIC REBATE 0.00 542.67 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 202 82100 SQUARE SPACE WEBSIT 0.00 248.40 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,891.07
TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,891.07
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 19
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 205 - HSG COMM DEVPT/CDBG FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087042 06/24/26 2727 APPARATUS DESIGN 205 80050 CDBG ART&ASTRONOMY 0.00 988.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 988.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 988.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 20
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 210 - POLICE IMPOUND FUND-STATE

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086934 06/17/26 7019 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE 210 77260 IOS CITATION S/WARE 0.00 17,627.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 17,627.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 17,627.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 21
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 211 - POLICE IMPOUND FUND-FED

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086934 06/17/26 7019 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE 211 77260 IOS CITATION S/WARE 0.00 39.78 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 39.78
TOTAL FUND 0.00 39.78
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 22
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 213 - POLICE IMP FD-FED-TREASUR

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086934 06/17/26 7019 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE 213 77260 IOS CITATION S/WARE 0.00 5,322.50 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 5,322.50
TOTAL FUND 0.00 5,322.50
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 23
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 220 - GAS TAX ST. IMPROV. FD

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086882 06/10/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 05/11 5391386120-8 0.00 30.99 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 8977352672-1 0.00 69.50 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 4569881751-2 0.00 385.70 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 6399329769-4 0.00 838.40 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 8976252125-3 0.00 220.70 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 7550015236-0 0.00 62.18 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 6371641442-8 0.00 70.30 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 9133041096-9 0.00 73.93 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/12 2278915408-9 0.00 1,980.27 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/15 4697514595-7 0.00 1,229.44 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 0104004435-4 0.00 203.35 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 6440996433-1 0.00 4,801.69 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 5800754046-9 0.00 83.05 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 0577169108-5 0.00 211.22 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 1927210900-0 0.00 133.37 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 0146442665-7 0.00 142.77 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 220 76150 06/08 7051879980-7 0.00 31.82 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,537.69
1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 11/19 HORTON S/LIGH 0.00 85.59 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 05/26 TR SIGNAL XTR 0.00 5,015.95 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 05/26 ST LIGHT XTRA 0.00 601.77 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 04/26 ST LIGHT XTRA 0.00 733.51 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 04/26 ST LIGHT MAIN 0.00 2,035.62 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 05/26 ST LIGHT MAIN 0.00 2,035.62 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 05/26 TR SIGNAL MAI 0.00 4,558.40 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 04/26 TR SIGNAL XTR 0.00 342.37 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 220 77340 03/18 PD EV CHARGER 0.00 342.37 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 15,751.20
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 26,319.88
TOTAL FUND 0.00 26,319.88
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 24
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 221 - ROAD MAINT & REHAB FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 221 2030 5%RETENTION EPW2300 0.00 -19,250.00 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 221 91900 12/25-04/28 ST.SCAP 0.00 385,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 365,750.00
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 365,750.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 365,750.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 25
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 225 - GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086864 06/10/26 5549 ECONOMIC & PLANNING 225 80050 04/26 EIH POLICY&DI 0.00 17,407.43 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 17,407.43
TOTAL FUND 0.00 17,407.43
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 26
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 230 - CHILD CARE PROGRAM

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 5200 76000 06/08 8383293552-8 0.00 1,638.56 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 SAFEWAY FOOD SUPPLY 0.00 91.98 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73500 MICHAELS OPERATING 0.00 31.08 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 COSTCO ECDC FOOD 0.00 272.86 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 COSTCO ECDC FOOD 0.00 268.15 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 COSTCO ECDC FOOD 0.00 264.52 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73500 L/SHORE OFFICE SUPP 0.00 108.38 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73500 PRIMO BRANDS WATER 0.00 54.12 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73500 D/TREE OPERATING SU 0.00 60.01 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 FOOD SERVICE ECDC 0.00 211.58 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 5200 73600 COSTCO ECDC FOOD 0.00 244.32 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,607.00
1000 20087098 06/24/26 7021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL 5200 85000 MAY-JUN COPIER LEAS 0.00 296.20 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73500 CREDIT ECDC SUPPLIE 0.00 -21.18 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73600 ECDC CHILDREN'S FOO 0.00 14.88 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73500 ECDC OPERATING SUPP 0.00 49.11 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73000 ECDC CLEANING SUPPL 0.00 170.15 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73600 ECDC CHILDREN SNACK 0.00 227.94 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73600 ECDC CHILDREN'S FOO 0.00 89.75 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73500 ECDC OPERATING SUPP 0.00 152.34 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73500 CREDIT ECDC SUPPLIE 0.00 -21.19 1000 20087105 06/30/26 6808 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5200 73500 OPERATING SUPPLIES 0.00 529.28 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,191.08
1000 20087118 06/30/26 6822 CHILDCARE CAREERS, 5200 80000 6/1-6/5 TEACHER AID 0.00 4,760.00 1000 20087118 06/30/26 6822 CHILDCARE CAREERS, 5200 80000 5/26-5/29 TEACHER A 0.00 3,770.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 8,530.00
1000 20087140 06/30/26 4669 PIXSCAN 5200 73500 BUS. CARDS-S. PEREN 0.00 95.03 1000 20087172 07/08/26 6338 PATATAS, LLC 5200 73600 07/26 ECDC FOOD PRO 0.00 14,164.33 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 27,522.20
TOTAL FUND 0.00 27,522.20
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 27
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 242 - MEASURE BB - STREETS/ROAD

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 242 91900 12/25-04/28 ST.SCAP 0.00 250,000.00 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 242 2030 5%RETENTION EPW2300 0.00 -12,500.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 237,500.00
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 237,500.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 237,500.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 28
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 243 - EMERYVILLE PUBLIC ART FD

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087175 07/08/26 7264 ROWAN GEIGER 243 77170 CONSERVATION TREATM 0.00 49,719.50 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 49,719.50
TOTAL FUND 0.00 49,719.50
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 29
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 247 - BROWNFIELDS EPA GRNT-CITY

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087101 06/24/26 3904 AGUATIERRA ASSOCIAT 247 80050 04/26 1245 POWELL 0.00 5,698.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 5,698.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 5,698.00
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 30
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 251 - URBAN FORESTRY FEE FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087174 07/08/26 6102 PLACEWORKS, INC 251 90610 05/26 TREE PALNT&DS 0.00 558.45 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 558.45
TOTAL FUND 0.00 558.45
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 31
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 254 - GRANT FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086903 06/17/26 6999 ABG ART GROUP LLC 254 80050 06/26 RCCD ADMIN SU 0.00 4,166.67 1000 20086903 06/17/26 6999 ABG ART GROUP LLC 254 80050 06/26 RCCD ADMIN SU 0.00 4,166.67 1000 20086903 06/17/26 6999 ABG ART GROUP LLC 254 80050 06/26 RCCD RESIDENC 0.00 4,500.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 12,833.34
1000 20086946 06/17/26 5549 ECONOMIC & PLANNING 254 80050 04/26 EIH POLICY&DI 0.00 8,230.00 1000 20087058 06/24/26 2083 EMERYVILLE TRANSPOR 254 80090 04/26 8-TO-GO SHUTT 0.00 7,537.08 1000 20087078 06/24/26 6102 PLACEWORKS, INC 254 80050 05/26 TENANT PROJEC 0.00 2,420.00 1000 20087157 07/08/26 6795 CHRISTOPHER ANDRES 254 73500 REIMB DECOY MEALS 0.00 50.20 1000 20087165 07/08/26 6212 HUFFMAN-BROADWAY GR 254 90130 4/6-5/3 AVIAN ASSES 0.00 4,490.00 1000 20087169 07/08/26 6098 MNS ENGINEERS, INC 254 90130 4/27-5/24 MCLAUGHLI 0.00 31,332.16 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 66,892.78
TOTAL FUND 0.00 66,892.78
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 32
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 263 - MEASURE BB - PARATRANSIT

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087045 06/24/26 7342 BRUCE ROSENBERG 263 88400 REIMB 4TH QTR TAXI 0.00 72.00 1000 20087053 06/24/26 5394 DEBRA AOKI 263 88400 REIMB 4TH QTR TAXI 0.00 19.80 1000 20087058 06/24/26 2083 EMERYVILLE TRANSPOR 263 88400 04/26 8-TO-GO SHUTT 0.00 6,593.89 1000 20087061 06/24/26 6553 GUITY AZIMI SADJUDI 263 88400 REIMB 3RD QTR TAXI 0.00 72.00 1000 20087062 06/24/26 6599 HAMID MIRSIAGHI 263 88400 REIMB 3RD QTR TAXI 0.00 72.00 1000 20087068 06/24/26 7218 JIN-HEE JIN 263 88400 REIMB 4TH QTR TAXI 0.00 16.16 1000 20087068 06/24/26 7218 JIN-HEE JIN 263 88400 REIMB 3RD QTR TAXI 0.00 72.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 88.16
1000 20087084 06/24/26 6912 SHANA HARRIS 263 88400 REIMB 3RD QTR TAXI 0.00 28.94 1000 20087100 06/24/26 4951 WALT WATMAN 263 88400 REIMB 4TH QTR TAXI 0.00 40.40 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 6,987.19
TOTAL FUND 0.00 6,987.19
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 33
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 268 - COMM DEV TECHNOLOGY FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086889 06/10/26 5391 SHI-GOVERNMENT SOLU 268 77260 BLUEBEAN REVU 0.00 905.95 1000 20087026 06/17/26 7207 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, 268 77260 5/12-5-22 PROJ MGMT 0.00 4,800.00 1000 20087145 06/30/26 1479 VERIZON WIRELESS 268 76050 06/25 271539223-000 0.00 495.30 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 6,201.25
TOTAL FUND 0.00 6,201.25
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 34
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 269 - PARKING PROGRAM

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086964 06/17/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 80385 05/26 TRANSACTION F 0.00 475.76 1000 20086964 06/17/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 86420 05/26 COIN COLLECTI 0.00 1,697.00 1000 20086964 06/17/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 77150 05/26 MAINTENANCE 0.00 3,917.00 1000 20086964 06/17/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 76050 05/26 TELECOMMUNICA 0.00 3,503.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 9,592.76
1000 20087066 06/24/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 86430 05/26 PARK CITATION 0.00 891.24 1000 20087066 06/24/26 6340 IPS GROUP, INC 269 80385 05/26 TRANSACTION F 0.00 477.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,368.62
1000 20087121 06/30/26 1165 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 269 2033 05/26 SURCHARGE FEE 0.00 2,084.50 1000 20087128 06/30/26 7388 LAZ PARKING 269 61040 REF COIN DEP-ERROR 0.00 1,182.85 1000 20087134 06/30/26 6557 PARKMOBILE, LLC 269 80385 05/26 TRANSACTION F 0.00 725.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 14,953.73
TOTAL FUND 0.00 14,953.73
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 35
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 270 - LITIGATION FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086920 06/17/26 1130 BAY CITIES JOINT PO 270 80110 04/26 GEN.LIAB CLAI 0.00 8,175.90 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 8,175.90
TOTAL FUND 0.00 8,175.90
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 36
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 284 - MEASURE C HOUSING BONDS

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087049 06/24/26 6754 CHANDLER ASSET MANA 284 80050 05/26 MEASURE C 0.00 2,394.64 1000 20087091 06/24/26 6674 U. S. BANK 284 80380 JAN-MAR'26 MEASURE 0.00 747.43 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,142.07
TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,142.07
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 37
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 299 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086855 06/10/26 1548 AMERINATIONAL COMMU 299 80050 04/26 MTHLY SVC FEE 0.00 30.34 1000 20086864 06/10/26 5549 ECONOMIC & PLANNING 299 80050 04/26 DIF FEE STUDY 0.00 60.82 1000 20086865 06/10/26 5692 EDEN COUNCIL FOR HO 299 88360 03/26 TENANT INQUIR 0.00 160.00 1000 20086865 06/10/26 5692 EDEN COUNCIL FOR HO 299 88360 04/26 TENANT INQUIR 0.00 120.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 280.00
1000 20086874 06/10/26 6358 HELLO HOUSING 299 80050 04/26 AFFORDABLE HS 0.00 17,973.49 1000 20086881 06/10/26 6397 OPERATION DIGNITY, 299 87420 04/26 HOMELESS O/R 0.00 14,256.47 1000 20087064 06/24/26 6358 HELLO HOUSING 299 80050 05/26 AFFORDABLE HS 0.00 12,235.68 1000 20087152 07/08/26 1548 AMERINATIONAL COMMU 299 80050 05/26 MTHLY SVC FEE 0.00 30.34 1000 20087171 07/08/26 6397 OPERATION DIGNITY, 299 87420 05/26 HOMELESS O/R 0.00 10,929.46 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 55,796.60
TOTAL FUND 0.00 55,796.60
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 38
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 472 - RDA BOND FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 472 91900 12/25-04/28 ST.SCAP 0.00 389,868.28 1000 20087113 06/30/26 6713 BAY CITIES PAVING & 472 2030 5%RETENTION EPW2300 0.00 -19,493.42 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 370,374.86
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 370,374.86
TOTAL FUND 0.00 370,374.86
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 39
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 475 - GEN CAPITAL IMPROVE FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086998 06/17/26 1978 MOORE IACOFANO GOLT 475 90130 04/26 POWELL REDESI 0.00 6,175.00 1000 20087078 06/24/26 6102 PLACEWORKS, INC 475 90130 05/26 EM PARKS RENO 0.00 7,513.75 1000 20087078 06/24/26 6102 PLACEWORKS, INC 475 90130 04/26 EM PARKS RENO 0.00 11,255.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 18,768.75
1000 20087125 06/30/26 6256 ITERIS, INC 475 90130 05/26 ON CALL TRAFF 0.00 22,616.00 1000 20087133 06/30/26 3788 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL, 475 90130 MCLAUGHLIN E/S ST.P 0.00 3,425.00 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 475 91860 05/18 HOLLIS & 59TH 0.00 4,450.00 1000 20087161 07/08/26 5069 DC ELECTRIC GROUP, 475 90100 04/16 HOLLIS PROJEC 0.00 8,238.23 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 12,688.23
1000 20087169 07/08/26 6098 MNS ENGINEERS, INC 475 90130 4/27-5/24 MCLAUGHLI 0.00 10,508.81 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 74,181.79
TOTAL FUND 0.00 74,181.79
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 40
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 495 - MARINA IMPROVEMENT FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086870 06/10/26 1045 KAREN BLUMENTHAL 495 73500 DOGI DISPENSER 0.00 921.40 1000 20086955 06/17/26 1045 KAREN BLUMENTHAL 495 73500 DOG ROLL BAG SUPPLI 0.00 1,854.30 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 495 76150 06/08 6440996433-1 0.00 6,660.82 1000 20087020 06/17/26 4061 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAM 495 73500 PAINT SUPPLIES MARI 0.00 40.75 1000 20087182 07/08/26 4061 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAM 495 73500 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 0.00 145.50 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 9,622.77
TOTAL FUND 0.00 9,622.77
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 41
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 510 - SEWER OPER/MAINT FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086863 06/10/26 1134 EBMUD 4360 76000 06/11 43799200001 0.00 129.60 1000 20087002 06/17/26 1148 PG&E 4360 76000 06/15 1817764650-4 0.00 139.51 1000 20087075 06/24/26 5868 PENINSULA PUMP AND 4360 77750 ANNUAL MAINT.LIFT S 0.00 3,150.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,419.11
TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,419.11
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 42
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 600 - WORKERS COMP SELF INS FD

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086913 V 06/17/26 3460 600 71370 MAY'26 ADP 0.00 -5,319.00 1000 20086913 06/17/26 3460 600 71370 MAY'26 ADP 0.00 5,319.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 20087041 06/24/26 3460 600 71370 JUNE'26 ADP 0.00 5,319.00 1000 20087106 06/30/26 3460 600 71370 REPLACE CK 20086913 0.00 5,319.00 1000 20087155 07/08/26 1130 BAY CITIES JOINT PO 600 81000 04/26 WC CLAIMS MES 0.00 8,246.81 1000 20087155 07/08/26 1130 BAY CITIES JOINT PO 600 81000 04/26 WC CLAIMS CIT 0.00 52,118.91 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 60,365.72
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 71,003.72
TOTAL FUND 0.00 71,003.72
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 43
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 610 - SELF-INS/DELTA DENTAL FD

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086939 06/17/26 3297 DELTACARE USA 610 72450 06/26 ACTIVE PREMIU 0.00 31.90 1000 20087054 06/24/26 3213 DELTA DENTAL OF CAL 610 80390 05/26 ACTIVE ADMIN 0.00 1,027.14 1000 20087054 06/24/26 3213 DELTA DENTAL OF CAL 610 72460 05/26 RETIREE CLAIM 0.00 7,724.10 1000 20087054 06/24/26 3213 DELTA DENTAL OF CAL 610 72450 05/26 ACTIVE CLAIMS 0.00 8,368.00 1000 20087054 06/24/26 3213 DELTA DENTAL OF CAL 610 80360 05/26 ACTIVE ADMIN 0.00 1,278.89 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 18,398.13
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 18,430.03
TOTAL FUND 0.00 18,430.03
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 44
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 650 - MAJOR MAINTENANCE FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086858 V 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 04/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 -27,000.00 1000 20086858 V 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 06/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 -27,000.00 1000 20086858 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 05/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 27,000.00 1000 20086858 V 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 05/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 -27,000.00 1000 20086858 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 04/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 27,000.00 1000 20086858 06/10/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 06/26 MTHLY MAINT F 0.00 27,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 20086899 06/10/26 7345 UNITED FENCE SERVIC 650 77030 REINSTALL GATES/PAN 0.00 2,150.00 1000 20087051 06/24/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 REPLACE CK 20086858 0.00 27,000.00 1000 20087051 06/24/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 REPLACE CK 20086858 0.00 27,000.00 1000 20087051 06/24/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 REPLACE CK 20086858 0.00 27,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 81,000.00
1000 20087071 06/24/26 7126 MONARCH PLUMBING AN 650 90100 SERVICE1301/1333 PA 0.00 50,733.00 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 650 77030 EASYKEYS FACILITY K 0.00 5.35 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 650 77030 WAYFAIR ECDC FOUNTA 0.00 508.28 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 513.63
1000 20087130 06/30/26 6632 MCGRATH RENTCORP 650 77030 06/17-07/16 STORAGE 0.00 373.50 1000 20087130 06/30/26 6632 MCGRATH RENTCORP 650 77030 06/16-07/15 STORAGE 0.00 373.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 747.00
1000 20087139 06/30/26 7058 SAFE AND SOUND SECU 650 77030 06/26 OPEN EYE MTHL 0.00 1,908.42 1000 20087159 07/08/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 77030 2/5-4/1 SUB-CONTRAC 0.00 1,154.45 1000 20087159 07/08/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90100 2/5-4/1 SUB-CONTRAC 0.00 420.00 1000 20087159 07/08/26 7260 COMMERCIAL MAINTENA 650 90000 2/5-4/1 SUB-CONTRAC 0.00 27,824.28 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 29,398.73
1000 20087176 07/08/26 7058 SAFE AND SOUND SECU 650 77030 CORP YARD CAMERAS 0.00 2,567.19 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 169,017.97
TOTAL FUND 0.00 169,017.97
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 45
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 660 - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086861 06/10/26 4543 STOMMEL, INC 660 91200 INSTALL ER EQUIPMEN 0.00 20,766.84 1000 20086861 06/10/26 4543 STOMMEL, INC 660 91200 INSTALL ER EQUIPMEN 0.00 20,998.90 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 41,765.74
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 41,765.74
TOTAL FUND 0.00 41,765.74
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 46
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 670 - INFO TECHNOLOGY FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086857 06/10/26 3237 COMCAST 670 76050 6/12 81554004104234 0.00 262.63 1000 20086866 06/10/26 6406 EVERGREEN SERVICES 670 77150 REPLACE CK 20085910 0.00 7,300.00 1000 20086875 06/10/26 6959 11:11 SYSTEMS, INC 670 77150 06/06 CLOUD BACKUP 0.00 4,097.12 1000 20086875 06/10/26 6959 11:11 SYSTEMS, INC 670 77150 06/06 RISK SCANNING 0.00 4,688.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 8,785.64
1000 20086879 06/10/26 6210 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, 670 90130 05/26 GIS SERVICES 0.00 900.00 1000 20086891 06/10/26 7068 SPECTROTEL HOLDING 670 76050 06/22 PIAB LINES 0.00 684.14 1000 20086900 06/10/26 7248 WILINE NETWORKS, IN 670 76050 06/26 NETWORK #8152 0.00 3,858.31 1000 20086934 06/17/26 7019 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE 670 77260 IOS CITATION S/WARE 0.00 11,610.72 1000 20086963 06/17/26 6959 11:11 SYSTEMS, INC 670 77150 04/26 CLOUD BACKUP 0.00 163.80 1000 20087036 06/17/26 6590 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNIC 670 77150 06/04-07/03 WEBINAR 0.00 84.40 1000 20087048 06/24/26 6281 CENTRALSQUARE TECHN 670 77150 5/17-5/23 ADMIN SVC 0.00 540.00 1000 20087059 06/24/26 6406 EVERGREEN SERVICES 670 77150 6/26-6/27 DUO MFA 1 0.00 9,153.00 1000 20087069 06/24/26 7306 LIMBLE SOLUTIONS, I 670 90130 5/26-8/26 ENT.LICEN 0.00 2,412.00 1000 20087088 06/24/26 3708 U.S. TELEPACIFIC CO 670 76050 06/09 PHONE BILL 0.00 4,525.59 1000 20087097 06/24/26 3005 U.S. BANK 670 77150 OPENAI SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 20.00 1000 20087116 06/30/26 7040 CALLTOWER, INC 670 76050 6/15-7/14 PHONE BIL 0.00 4,001.48 1000 20087124 06/30/26 6959 11:11 SYSTEMS, INC 670 77150 05/26 CLOUD BACKUP 0.00 166.32 1000 20087166 07/08/26 6959 11:11 SYSTEMS, INC 670 77150 07/26 CLOUD BACKUP 0.00 1,033.63 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 55,501.66
TOTAL FUND 0.00 55,501.66
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 47
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 710 - POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20086892 06/10/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 710 72500 06/26 RETIRE LIFE P 0.00 6.06 1000 20087028 06/17/26 1121 VISION SERVICE PLAN 710 72300 06/25 RETIRE PREMIU 0.00 2,175.50 1000 20087179 07/08/26 2990 STANDARD INSURANCE 710 72500 07/26 RETIREE LIFE 0.00 6.06 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 2,187.62
TOTAL FUND 0.00 2,187.62
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 48
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 17:03:38 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no<'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 805 - PROP/BUS IMP DISTR (PBID)

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 20087122 06/30/26 2083 EMERYVILLE TRANSPOR 805 80090 GEN. BENEFIT FY25-2 0.00 380,385.50 1000 20087122 06/30/26 2083 EMERYVILLE TRANSPOR 805 80090 2ND PYMT FY25-26 0.00 2,390,424.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,770,809.50
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 2,770,809.50
TOTAL FUND 0.00 2,770,809.50
TOTAL REPORT 0.00 5,386,483.84
CENTRALSQUARE PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 07/13/2026 CITY OF EMERYVILLE ACCTPA21
TIME: 16:50:58 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between '20260609 00:00:00.000' and '20260713 00:00:00.000' and transact.check_no>'500000' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/27
FUND - 282 - RDA RETIREMENT FD (RPTTF)

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/DIVISION ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1000 50002107 06/17/26 4122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & S 282 80360 05/26 SA DTSC ORD 0.00 678.60 1000 50002107 V 06/17/26 4122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & S 282 80360 05/26 SA DTSC ORD 0.00 -678.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 50002108 06/17/26 1509 COX, CASTLE & NICHO 282 80100 10/20/23 CORP YARD 0.00 6,154.44 1000 50002108 V 06/17/26 1509 COX, CASTLE & NICHO 282 80100 10/20/23 CORP YARD 0.00 -6,154.44 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 50002109 V 06/17/26 1300 EKI ENVIRONMENT & W 282 80050 04/01-05/31 SBF SIT 0.00 -244.14 1000 50002109 06/17/26 1300 EKI ENVIRONMENT & W 282 80050 04/01-05/31 SBF SIT 0.00 244.14 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00
1000 50002110 06/17/26 4122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & S 282 80360 05/26 SA DTSCORD 0.00 678.60 1000 50002111 06/17/26 1509 COX, CASTLE & NICHO 282 80100 10/20/23 CORP YARD 0.00 6,154.44 1000 50002112 06/17/26 1300 EKI ENVIRONMENT & W 282 80050 04/01-05/31 SBF SIT 0.00 244.14 1000 50002113 06/24/26 1300 EKI ENVIRONMENT & W 282 80050 04/01-04/30 FMW/COR 0.00 1,159,214.54 1000 50002113 06/24/26 1300 EKI ENVIRONMENT & W 282 80050 05/01-05/31 SBF SIT 0.00 66,790.48 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,226,005.02
1000 50002114 06/30/26 5324 SUSAN G. MAYER 282 80360 25-26 YR END ROPS L 0.00 2,015.50 1000 50002115 07/08/26 2102 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC 282 80050 01/26-03/26 SBF SIT 0.00 5,626.56 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,240,724.26
TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,240,724.26
TOTAL REPORT 0.00 1,240,724.26
City of Emeryville Page 1 of 4
Members:

Mayor Sukhdeep Kaur
Vice Mayor Matthew Solomon
Council Member David Mourra
Council Member Kalimah A. Priforce
Council Member Courtney Welch

CITY OF EMERYVILLE

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL
Emeryville City Hall
1333 Park Avenue
Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 596-4300 phone
(510) 450-7831 fax
www.emeryville.org
Tuesday, July 07, 2026 7:00 PM Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM
The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Sukhdeep Kaur, Vice Mayor Matthew Solomon, Council Member David Mourra, Council Member Courtney Welch

Absent: Council Member Kalimah Priforce
Council Member Priforce was absent 7:01 p.m. – 7:18 p.m.

3. APPROVAL OF FINAL AGENDA
Mayor Kaur removed item 11.2 (Powell Street Redesign Concept) as she is waiting for a decision from the FPPC as to whether she needs to recuse herself from the vote.

MOVED by Kaur and SECONDED by Mourra to approve the final agenda as amended.

RESULT: Passed [4 TO 0]
AYES: Kaur, Solomon, Mourra, Welch
NOES: None
ABSENT: Priforce

4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY

4.1. PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE RECOGNIZING JULY 2026 AS “PARKS MAKE LIFE BETTER!” MONTH

5. COUNCIL MEMBER SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS ON MEETING ATTENDANCE City Council MINUTES July 07, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 2 of 4

6. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

7. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Kaur, Vice Mayor Solomon, and Council Members Mourra and Welch all received emails from residents regarding the Powell Street Redesign Concept Plan.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT AGENDA AND ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 9 speakers.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOVED by Mourra and SECONDED by Welch to approve the Consent Calendar.

RESULT: Passed [4 TO 1]
AYES: Kaur, Solomon, Mourra, Welch
NOES: Priforce

9.1. ALL ORDINANCES DEEMED READ BY TITLE ONLY AND ALL FURTHER READING WAIVED

9.2. ACTION MINUTES OF THE JUNE 16, 2026, CLOSED SESSION

9.3. ACTION MINUTES OF THE JUNE 16, 2026, CITY COUNCIL MEETING

9.4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AMENDING THE

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR LOCAL BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES TO

CONFORM WITH NEW BROWN ACT REQUIREMENTS

9.5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT A GRANT FROM THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA FIRST 5

EMERGENCY GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE EMERYVILLE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE-HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000) AND AUTHORIZE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 TO RECORD THE GRANT IN ACCOUNT 230-53650 AND EXPENDITURES OF $18,000 IN ACCOUNT 230-71000 AND $82,000 IN ACCOUNT 230-73600

9.6. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (ATP) ANNUAL REPORT

9.7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE ADOPTING THE 2026/2027 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY TABLE PURSUANT TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM (ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE PLANNING REGULATIONS)

9.8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE APPROVING THE

ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MASTER PROGRAMS FUNDING

AGREEMENT(S) FOR MEASURE B, MEASURE BB, AND VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE

DIRECT LOCAL DISTRIBUTION FUNDS

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS

11. ACTION ITEMS

11.1. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE CALLING FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026; REQUESTING APPROVAL OF City Council MINUTES July 07, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 3 of 4
CONSOLIDATION WITH THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; REQUESTING THE COUNTY

REGISTRAR OF VOTERS PERFORM CERTAIN ELECTION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026 ELECTION; AND AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT TO THE

COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS FOR ELECTION SERVICES PERFORMED 1 speaker.

MOVED by Mourra and SECONDED by Welch
RESULT: Passed [5 TO 0]
AYES: Kaur, Solomon, Mourra, Priforce, Welch
NOES: None

11.2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE APPROVING THE

POWELL STREET REDESIGN PLAN DESIGN CONCEPT
This item was removed from the agenda.

12. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS

12.1. ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMMISSION/COMMITTEE VACANCIES

12.2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR’S REPORT ON PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS AT THE JUNE 25, 2026 MEETING:
a. Sutter Hospital Medical Center (PUD25-001). A Study Session to review a proposal for an amendment to the Chiron Planned Unit Development to construct a new 330-foot tall, 785,000 square foot hospital building; a new 50-foot tall, 55,600 square foot building for either medical office use or a 57-unit residential building; and conversion of two existing buildings to medical office uses totaling 563,200 square feet. The project will require a General Plan Amendment to accommodate the 330-foot hospital building height and will include removal of 10 street trees on 53rd Street and 6 street trees on Horton Street. CEQA Status: TBD. General Plan Land Use Designation:

Office/Technology; Zoning Designation: PUD-3 (Applicant/Owner: Sutter Health) (APNs: 49-1558-2; -4;-5;-6; 49-1544-2;49-104129-1).*
b. Annual Active Transportation (ATP) Report. Review of the second annual report on progress made towards Active Transportation Plan (ATP) goals and policies during the 2025 calendar year. This informational item is consistent with ATP policy recommendation A-5: Plan Evaluation that requires regular updates on plan implementation to relevant City committees, the Commission and the City Council.** *This item is scheduled for a City Council Study Session on July 21, 2026 **This item is scheduled for the City Council meeting of July 7, 2026

13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
Council Member Priforce requested and received majority support to refer an item to the City Manager/City Attorney to investigate deed theft in the City of Emeryville.

14. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:44 p.m.

City Council MINUTES July 07, 2026
City of Emeryville Page 4 of 4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were adopted at a regular meeting of the Emeryville City Council.
/s/ April Foran, CMC
City Clerk
City of Emeryville

C A L I F O R N I A

M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 21, 2026
TO: Chair and Board of Directors
FROM: LaTanya Bellow, Executive Director
SUBMITTED BY: Pedro Jimenez, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE

AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE EMERYVILLE REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY ACCEPTING THE FMW SITE DEMOLITION AND
EXCAVATION PROJECT, CIP NO. 23 EPW003 AS COMPLETE;

AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF

COMPLETION WITH THE ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the above-entitled resolution.

BACKGROUND
The former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) acquired the former Marchant/Whitney Tool Site located at 5679 Horton Street, Emeryville (“FMW Site”), in 1999, primarily to facilitate the extension of Horton Street from 53rd Street to Haruff Street, as well as the connection with Stanford Avenue, as these roadways are currently configured. Use of the FMW Site was discontinued in 2012 because of concerns regarding impacts of hazardous substances contamination in the soil and groundwater and indoor air within the building on the FMW Site.

In spring 2017, following several years of remedial investigation under the oversight of DTSC, the Successor Agency was preparing to approve a cleanup plan for the FMW Site with the goal of commencing remedial activities in fall 2017. However, funding for this obligation of the Successor Agency was suddenly denied by the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) in connection with the ROPS for the 2017-2018 period, as well as the 2018-2019 period. Thereafter, on May 21, 2019, the Successor Agency sued DOF in Sacramento County Superior Court. On February 27, 2020, the Superior Court ruled in favor of the Successor Agency, finding that the Successor Agency has an obligation to address hazardous material impacts to South Bayfront Site B arising from off-site sources, such as from the FMW Site, pursuant to the settlement agreement between the former Redevelopment Agency and Chevron. Thus, funding for the Successor Agency to remediate the FMW Site was to be restored. Nevertheless, DOF filed an appeal of the trial court’s ruling on April 24, 2020. During the pendency of the appeal, on August 13, 2020, DTSC issued an Imminent and/or Substantial Endangerment Determination Order and Remedial Action Order (“Order”) to the Successor Agency to remediate hazardous substances contamination in soil and groundwater at the FMW Site. The Order requires the Successor Agency to, among FMW Site Demolition And Excavation Project, Project No. 23 EPW003- Project Acceptance City Council Meeting | July 21, 2026