ESCALON MINUTES
CALIFORNIA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 2025
CALIFORNI City Council Chambers, 2060 McHenry Avenue -7:00 P.M.
INCORPORATED MARCH 12, 1957
Beginning Resolution No. 48-25
Beginning Ordinance No. 600
Beginning Minute Order No. 63-25
PRESENT: Mayor Andrew Hagan
Mayor Pro Tem Malinda Walker
Councilmember Jeremy Engle
Councilmember Shawn Strohman
Councilmember Jeff Kay
STAFF PRESENT: Jaylen French, City Manager (CM)
Celinda Bickner, Finance Director/HR Administrator (FDHRA) Juston Collins, Public Works Superintendent (PWS)
PRESENTATIONS
1. South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) Update Presentation on their Bid to Become the Electric Utility Service Provider in the Area
Mr. Peter Rietkerk provided a brief introduction of his colleagues and highlighted SSJID's services and workforce. Following this, Mr. Bill Schwandt, SSJID's Electric Utility Manager, delivered a PowerPoint presentation outlining the services available to the City of Escalon. He noted SSJID's collaboration with OID and MID and emphasized the significant cost savings they can offer-approximately 15% lower than PG&E rates, equating to $15 million annually and an estimated $174 million over the first ten years.
Councilmember Engle thanked Mr. Schwandt for his presentation and inquired how the proposed 15% rate reduction compared to SSJID's current customers. Mr. Schwandt clarified that SSJID does not presently provide retail electric service. Engle further questioned how SSJID could ensure its rates would align with other agencies and the expected timeline for achieving that. Schwandt explained that a financial analysis is underway, and once completed and reviewed by the board, it will be made public. Engle emphasized the need for safeguards for the City and asked about reserve levels. Schwandt stated that utilities typically maintain reserves equal to about 125 days of operating expenses and highlighted that SSJID's board process allows for public accountability, unlike PG&E.
Councilmember Strohman thanked Mr. Schwandt for his presentation and noted that Escalon is currently divided between MID and PG&E customers. He asked how a transition to SSJID would affect existing MID customers. Mr. Schwandt explained, referencing the presentation graph, that MID rates are approximately 60% lower than PG&E and therefore about 45% lower than SSJID's projected rates. He clarified that SSJID has no plans to assume MID's service area, and current MID customers would continue receiving service from MID.
Councilmember Strohman asked what additional ways the City could support SSJID beyond the MOU. Mr.
Rietkerk thanked the Council for their consideration and explained that SSJID is currently promoting its Powered by Purpose campaign, which residents can follow and subscribe to for updates. He also encouraged submitting letters of support to legislators, elected officials, and the Public Utilities Commission.
Councilmember Kay presented a comparison of current PG&E and MID bills, noting PG&E's substantially higher charges per kilowatt-hour. He explained this disparity is why the City has been actively pursuing alternatives, including meetings with Congressman Harder and upcoming discussions with Senator McNerney, to advocate for change. Kay then asked how soon residents could expect to see comparable rates if SSJID were to assume service. Mr. Schwandt responded that it may take some time, depending on financial conditions and market factors.
Mayor Hagan acknowledged the ongoing labor negotiations and the presence of employees in the audience, noting that questions regarding the MOU and the City of Escalon could be raised.
Public Hearing Opened at 7:38 p.m.
Resident Gabriella Vargas asked how switching to SSJID would affect customers with solar, noting that she currently pays a connection fee with PG&E. Mr. Schwandt responded that her rates would decrease by about 15% and explained that SSJID's approach would likely mirror MID's policies, which could provide the best comparison for answering her question.
Resident Sherry Hill expressed concern that as PG&E continues to raise rates, she hopes SSJID's 15% reduction would be calculated from current PG&E rates rather than the potentially higher future rates.
Two employees attempted to speak regarding SSJID and ongoing labor negotiations. Mayor Hagan respectfully interrupted, explaining that the meeting was not the appropriate venue for those comments.
Public Hearing Closed at 7:44 p.m.
Councilmember Strohman inquired if the minimum $10.00 connection fee for solar by PG&E is something that SSJID would charge for as well. Mr. Schwandt explained that is something that would be in the realm of the rates that the board would determine among other things.
Mayor Hagan thanked the members of SSJID for attending the night's meeting and appreciated the information given.
2. Escalon Parks Foundation (EPF) Update Presentation on the Proposed Escalon Skate Park Resident Jeff Laugero addressed the Council on behalf of the Escalon Park Foundation, providing an update on plans for the future development of the Escalon skate park. He reported that proceeds from the recent fundraising event, the fireworks booth, have secured sufficient funds to advance the project's first phase.
Laugero outlined the proposed design, potential location, and tentative construction start date, and presented the original master plan along with various park options for consideration.
Councilmember Strohman asked when fundraising for the skate park began. Mr. Laugero stated that efforts started around 2013 and included a collaboration with the Lions Club at the Park Fete, which generated some funds and provided public exposure for the design, though the fireworks booth was more successful.
Strohman then inquired about the project's phases. Laugero explained that the skate park will be completed in three phases, with the first phase focusing on the "clover" bowl. He noted that they are working with Dreamland, who have been highly cooperative, and additional phases will proceed as further funds are raised.
Councilmember Strohman expressed concern that, given the extended time required to fundraise for the first phase, securing funds for the second and third phases could take even longer. Mr. Laugero explained that this is why they are beginning with the "clover" bowl, as it functions as a standalone feature and allows for expansion once additional funds are raised.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker noted that raising funds for the first phase of the project took approximately 15 years and inquired about additional efforts by EPF to expedite the process. Mr. Laugero responded that developing the bowl is intended to generate community interest, which could encourage further support.
He emphasized that the Parks Foundation will continue fundraising privately for the park, including the next two phases, but noted that the timeline for securing the necessary funds remains uncertain.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker emphasized the need for a paved park in Escalon, noting the absence of a space where skaters can progress from beginner to intermediate levels before advancing to the bowl. She expressed concerns about beginners potentially interfering with more advanced skaters and the overall safety of users. In response, Mr. Laugero shared that both adults and teenagers have expressed interest, with parents specifically seeking a local facility so they do not have to drive their children to neighboring communities to skate.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker expressed concerns about the proposed location, noting that it would be discussed later in the agenda. Acknowledging limited funding, she suggested that street features, such as concrete benches and fencing, could be added in the future. Mr. Laugero agreed that incorporating street features would be beneficial and expressed hope for future donations to support them. For now, due to budget constraints, the project will move forward with the bowl, while fencing will be addressed separately as part of the MOU discussions.
Councilmember Engle thanked the Escalon Parks Foundation for their dedication, perseverance, and commitment to reaching their goal, emphasizing their efforts to provide a recreational space for Escalon's youth. He expressed confidence that once the first phase is completed, the remaining phases will follow more easily. Engle also voiced support for the proposed location, noting it aligns with the vision for future expansion of Hogan Park and the broader direction of recreation in Escalon.
Councilmember Kay thanked the Escalon Parks Foundation for their longstanding efforts and attendance at the meeting. He inquired whether the Foundation holds regular meetings open to the public and how those are announced. Mr. Laugero confirmed that public meetings are typically held starting in April and are primarily announced through Facebook, though additional outreach methods would be welcomed. Kay suggested utilizing the City's bi-monthly newsletter to share updates on the skate park and upcoming meetings in order to increase public involvement.
Councilmember Strohman asked when the last survey was conducted to assess the need for a skate park.
Mr. Laugero responded that a survey was completed in 2015-16 but not since then. Strohman expressec concern about whether enough children would use the facility to justify the significant investment, noting he would not want the project to move forward if there were no real demand. Mr. Laugero disagreed with that concern.
Councilmember Kay added that he believes there is already a group of kids who will actively use the skate park and that participation will likely increase once the facility is built.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker asked where the Escalon Parks Foundation's central office is located and requested copies of the most current EPF By-Laws. Mr. Laugero agreed to provide those copies to the City Manager.
Public Hearing Opened at 8:19 p.m.
Resident Gabriella Vargas asked how much additional funding would be required to complete the project.
Mr. Laugero estimated around $125,000 but did not provide an exact figure. Vargas then asked if the City had contributed financially, to which Laugero clarified that no City funds had been used and all money raised has come through private fundraising by the Escalon Parks Foundation. Vargas noted that some Council comments made it seem like a financial burden on the City, which she emphasized it is not. She shared that her son is a skateboarder and would greatly benefit from having a local facility. Vargas asked Chief Hardgraves if children were permited on sidewalks, schools and such and he responded that children are not permitted to skate on private property or public rights-of-way. Vargas suggested that beginners might start learning in their driveways before advancing to the bowl once more experienced.
Resident Sherry Hill stated that she supports the project, noting it would provide much-needed opportunities for older children since the town currently offers few options for them. She expressed confidence that community interest will grow once the skate park is built and voiced her belief in the plan's success. Hill also suggested using the Escalon Residency Facebook page to share updates, given its large following.
Resident Paige Kay asked whether bikes and scooters would be permitted at the new skate park. Mr.
Laugero responded that the decision would ultimately be at the City's discretion regarding how the park will be operated.
Resident Kurt Danziger expressed appreciation for everyone's hard work on the project but noted that it stalled six years ago due to the lack of a signed MOU with the Parks Foundation. He presented documentation regarding the MOU and the reasons it was not executed, cautioning that the Council may be proceeding prematurely. Danziger emphasized the importance of having a signed MOU that clearly outlines responsibilities and expressed hope that substantial donations would help complete the project.
Public Hearing Closed at 8:29 p.m.
Councilmember Engle sought clarification regarding the MOU and the site designated in 2019, noting that the site currently being proposed at the meeting differs from the original location. CM French confirmed this, explaining that the proposed site currently serves as overflow parking. Mr. Laugero added that the initial MOU included numerous conditions, such as bathroom upgrades and ADA compliance, but the project never advanced due to insufficient funding. He noted that he drafted a more streamlined MOU for CM French to review, reflecting the current realities of the project.
Resident Kurt Danziger requested a rebuttal, noting that a resubmittal of the MOU had been made in the past with altered language. He stated that there is no need to create a new MOU, but rather to review the existing document and proceed.
Councilmember Kay stated that if the City enters into the MOU with the Escalon Parks Foundation and the bowl is installed, it constitutes a complete feature within a complete park. He indicated that the City would not be responsible for any additional elements, noting that discussions can continue while the project progresses. Kay expressed confidence that the City's attorney will review the MOU to ensure all aspects are properly addressed.
Mayor Hagan thanked the members of the Escalon Parks Foundation for their hard work and dedication to supporting the community.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Approve Minutes from the Meeting of August 4, 2025
4. Approve Register of Demands for the Month of July-August 2025 in the Amount of $739,890.90 MOTION - it was m/s by STROHMAN/KAY to Approve the Consent Calendar as Presented.
Motion carried 5-0. MINUTE ORDER 63-25.
STAFF COMMUNICATION
5. July Updates
a. Treasurer's Report for July
b. Police Department Report for July
c. Animal Control Report for July
d. Recreation Report for July
e. Development Services Report for July
f. Public Works Report for July
g. Building Department for July
Water Department Report for July
i. Waste Water Treatment Plant Report for July
j. City Manager's Report (Verbal)
FDHRA Bickner provided an update on recent financial activities, highlighting a productive Measure P nboarding meeting. She noted that the July financials have been closed, and the June year-end close i early complete, after which the information will be ready for auditor review. Additionally, she reporte that the City's Transit audit is currently in progress and nearing completion.
Chief Hardgraves reported that the application period for the police officer position has closed, with 36 applications received, of which 11 were deemed qualified for interviews.
PWS Collins updated that materials for the library roof have arrived, and installation began last week. He also reminded the community that this Wednesday marks the final Farmer's Market of the year. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Walker's inquiry about the Yosemite Sidewalk Project, Collins noted that the waterline has been completed, and contractors are currently working on the sidewalks, with project completion anticipated by late September or early October.
CM French provided several updates; in response to a previous inquiry about the cost of a HOC system an enhanced lighting feature aimed at improving pedestrian safety-the estimated cost for installation across Highway 120 and Elizabeth is approximately $400,000. Council also directed staff to explore the addition of swing sets at Swanson Park, with further information expected in September. French also informed that the first Economic Development Committee meeting is scheduled for August 26th. In regards to infrastructure, discussions are ongoing with Unwired, a private company that installs fiber broadband for high-speed internet. Lastly, in the coming weeks, Council will receive a document outlining the proposed PERS pay down plan.
Mayor Hagan inquired about the benches around the community for senior citizens. CM French informed that staff is looking into that as well as to where and how it will be funded.
MATTERS PRESENTED FROM THE AUDIENCE
Resident Gabriella Vargas inquired about the operational status of sprinklers across various parks, noting that several at Swanson Park may require redirection. She also reported a non-functioning crosswalk light at Highway 120 and McHenry, observing ongoing work in the area. Public Works Supervisor Collins stated he would investigate both issues.
Resident Kurt Danziger addressed FDHRA Bickner regarding the allocation and efficiency of water fees collected over the past 10 years for system rehabilitation, including funding for a well and the waterline connection from SSJID to Escalon. FDHRA Bickner confirmed that funds are available for the project and that efforts to build the capital reserve are ongoing
Mr. Danziger then inquired about fees related to communications between the City attorney and Harris & Associates, specifically whether any staff received text messages and if those messages were included in the Harris report. CM French noted he was unsure which messages were referenced but explained that significant legal work was involved, including coordination between legal counsel and consultants, with related costs reflected in the budget and LLD reports.
Mr. Danziger expressed that his question remained unanswered, noting that communication between the City and Harris & Associates amounted to $15,000 and asked where those messages could be accessed and whether they were part of the report or publicly available. Mayor Hagan stated he would look into the matter. CM French clarified that communications with legal counsel are generally protected under the Freedom of Information Act due to potential sensitivity but added that any Council questions regarding these communications could be addressed in that forum.
Resident Sherry Hill highlighted that gatherings will take place at the State Capitol concerning AB495, which impacts school-aged children, and encouraged community involvement and attendance.
Resident David Bellinger raised concerns about a dead tree at First and Oklahoma that is obstructing a stop sign, posing a potential safety hazard, and requested its removal or trimming. He also inquired about the installation of sidewalks at Main Street Park. CM French responded that the project has been coordinated with SJCOG and finalized, with construction expected to begin in January after the busy season, and that the project will be going out to bid soon.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
6. Consider a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) regarding Payments in Lieu of Franchise Fees
CM French presented the staff report on SSJID and the MOU with them and the City.
Councilmember Kay sought clarification on whether the arrangement would be a direct payment rather than a franchise fee. Katie Patterson, SSJID Public and Government Relations Manager, confirmed the franchise remains in place, with the payment reflecting permissive use of areas to deliver power to residents. Under a LAFCO condition, 2.5% of SSJID revenue is shared with cities in its jurisdiction and the county. The roposed MOU will establish these details, demonstrating strong community relationships and readiness ormalize agreements, as previously done with San Joaquin County and the City of Mantec Mayor Pro Tem Walker clarified that the MOU does not obligate the City to SSJID at this time; it only outlines conditions that would be included in a future contract if the City decides to proceed. CM French confirmed this.
City Attorney Splendorio (remotely) noted that while the MOU was reviewed and minor clarifying changes were proposed, it is largely finalized and cannot be altered at this time. He emphasized that the MOU should be viewed as a letter of intent, providing the City the potential to receive SSJID retail electric service in 4- 6 years. At that point, the City would enter into a more formal agreement with greater protections and detailed provisions.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker asked whether the MOU would be binding in 4-6 years, implying a commitment to switch to SSJID. Ms. Patterson clarified that the MOU's intent is simply to facilitate discussions at that time and determine whether a mutually satisfactory agreement can be reached.
Public Hearing Opened at 9:01 p.m.
Sheila Waton, an SSJID employee, questioned the City's interest in entering into an MOU with SSJID given the uncertainty and lengthy timeline associated with acquiring PG&E's assets. She noted that SSJID has been engaged in a 20-year legal battle, costing approximately $35 million to ratepayers and employees, and urged the Council to carefully consider whether pursuing an MOU with SSJID is in the City's best interest.
Public Hearing Closed at 9:03 p.m.
MOTION - it was m/s STROHMAN/KAY to Adopt a Memorandum of Understanding Between the South San Joaquin Irrigation District and the City of Escalon Regarding Payments from SSJID in Lieu of Franchise Fees from PG&E for Retail Electric Service. Motion carried 5-1. MINUTE ORDER 64-25
7. Introduce and Discuss Next Steps for the Escalon Skate Park, Including Potential Location CM French presented the staff report on potential locations for the skate park, outlining five possible sites and reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Mayor Hagan asked Mr. Laugero about the size of the proposed skate bowl and whether, in theory, it would be preferable to place it near Escalon Bellota Road. Mr. Laugero explained that while the location has both advantages and drawbacks, one major concern is its proximity to the road and the risk of skateboards entering traffic. However, benefits include ease of police patrol, ample opportunities to mount security cameras, existing bathrooms and parking, and the fact that the property is already City-owned.
Councilmember Kay asked Chief Hardgraves for his perspective on the proposed skate bowl location. Chief Hardgraves responded that the Escalon Parks Foundation has addressed the key concerns, noting that a location closer to the road would be easier to patrol. He added that the existing overflow parking lot will eventually be converted into a regular lot, with access being the primary issue to resolve. He further noted that cameras and lighting are already in place at the site, making it feasible to expand the security network.
Mayor Hagan asked Chief Hardgraves whether he was aware of any issues at the Oakdale skate park, which is also located along a busy road. Chief Hardgraves replied that he was not aware of any but would look into it. Mayor Hagan suggested that installing a fence could mitigate concerns about skateboards entering the roadway and emphasized that the skate park should ultimately be constructed in the location identified in the master plan.
Councilmember Strohman expressed concern that the process felt rushed, noting the goal of a December 5th start date while the City still needs to finalize a location, review and approve the MOU, submit construction documents, and complete permitting-all within four months. He asked about the timeline for plan review, to which CM French responded that the typical turnaround is 10-15 days.
Councilmember Strohman thanked Mr. Laugero and the Escalon Parks Foundation members for attending and answering questions. He stated that while Council can identify a proposed location, the MOU remains the key component, as previously emphasized by resident Danziger. Strohman reflected on the MOU's progress under past Councils and the responsibilities of each party, stressing that the process should not be rushed and that a signed agreement must be in place before moving forward.
Councilmember Engle disagreed with Councilmember Strohman and asked City Attorney Splendorio for his perspective. Splendorio explained that the City currently "holds all the cards," as the Escalon Parks Foundation (EPF) has raised funds but lacks entitlements or approvals, meaning they will ultimately need a permit or agreement from the City. He noted that specifics-such as site location, responsibilities, and project details— will need to be addressed in the MOU. Councilmember Engle emphasized that this was his point: Council must first identify a site in order to move forward with the MOU. Splendorio confirmed there is no risk to the City and that EPF will eventually require approval to break ground on City property.
Engle concluded that beginning discussions to determine the site location makes sense so it can be incorporated into the MOU.
Mayor Hagan asked City Attorney Splendorio what information was needed to prepare the MOU and to address any outstanding issues from prior Councils. Splendorio reiterated that key details must be established first, including the site location, project design, minimum requirements for EPF, and insurance provisions. He clarified that while the Council does not need to finalize the MOU at this meeting, it should determine what elements must be included in order to move the process forward.
Councilmember French highlighted that a key change since the last round of MOU discussions is that a full skate park, as originally outlined in the plans, is no longer being proposed at this time.
He emphasized that this new development presents a different dynamic for the Council to take into consideration moving forward
Mayor Pro Tem Walker expressed some disappointment that EPF did not return to renegotiate the MOU in 2019 but instead allowed the matter to lapse. She noted that had they resumed discussions at that time, the MOU could likely have already been finalized and signed.
Council discussions addressed potential locations, safety concerns, parking, and the likelihood of noise complaints if the skate park were placed in residential areas. Councilmembers asked whether EPF had explored options with private property owners. EPF responded that they had not, explaining that they lack the funds to purchase land and have always operated under the assumption that the skate park would be built on City-owned property.
Councilmember Strohman asked how the future park expansion might be impacted by the project. CM French advised that, if the project proceeds, it would be prudent to conduct either a brief or comprehensive review of the master plan to reassess the placement of both the parking area and the skate park.
Public Hearing Opened at 9:43 p.m.
Resident Gary Haskin expressed his view that the skate park should remain at its originally proposed location, citing its visibility, available overflow parking, and convenient police access, which he felt made it the most cohesive option. He also reminded the Council that EPF and the City are separate entities, noting that EPF has raised the funds and submitted the proposal, and that any prior MOUs are now irrelevant and carry no precedent.
Resident Kurt Dazinger stated that he believes the Council has overcomplicated the issue, suggesting that the location decision should simply be made contingent upon signing the MOU. He reiterated his earlier comments regarding the previous MOU.
Public Hearing Closed at 9:51 p.m.
Councilmember Strohman asked Mr. Laugero to clarify the issues with the previous MOU. Mr. Laugero explained that the primary concern was the financial burden placed on EPF, including costs for infrastructure such as ADA-compliant restrooms, sidewalks, and parking, which ultimately prevented an agreement.
Councilmember Strohman also raised concerns about the lack of ADA-accessible paths in the current project plans. Mr. Laugero responded that addressing such requirements is precisely the purpose of the MOU, noting that once a site is confirmed, those details can be worked out.
Mayor Hagan reminded the Council that their immediate task was only to decide whether to proceed with developing the MOU, not to determine its specific contents at this stage. He emphasized that Council and staff could address the details and resolve any issues before bringing the finalized MOU back to Council for consideration to advance the project.
Councilmember Engle expressed disagreement, stating that the proposed location is not ideal for the skate park. He argued that separating it from the main park would hinder future expansion and suggested placing it in the back, where a shorter connection to the existing parking lot and overflow parking could better support additional development.
He further noted his disappointment that some have criticized the time and efforts invested, emphasizing that what matters now is introducing and discussing the next steps. Engle acknowledged that, as with many issues before the Council, disagreement is prolonging progress, warning that continued delays will lead to higher costs and potentially a missed opportunity.
MOTION - it was m/s HAGAN/ENGLE to Move Forward with the MOU and Issues Regarding Location Motion did not pass 2-2-1 (Nays - Walker and Kay. Abstain - Strohman) MINUTE ORDER 65-25 Councilmember Kay stated that the only reason he did not agree with Councilmember Engle was in regards to the paths to the parking lots and the work that would have to go into it to be ADA compliant.
MOTION it was m/s KAY/HAGAN to Move Forward with the MOU and Issues Regarding Location and to Direct Escalon Parks Foundation to Explore the East and West Side, Costs of Both Location Options and Have a Discussion with the Chief Building Official Regarding Accessibility. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Nay - Walker. Abstain - Engle). Minute Order 66-25
Council Communications
Councilmember Engle extended an invitation to the Lions Community BBQ, scheduled for September 4th from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. at Hogan Park.
Councilmember Kay inquired about the traffic study conducted between California and Mitchell Streets and asked if it could be repeated. Chief Hardgraves explained that the study was performed while school was in session, which is why it was extended by an extra week. Councilmember Kay also asked about truck traffic from the cannery and whether that area was being patrolled. Chief Hardgraves confirmed that additional patrols have been instructed for that area.
Councilmember Kay recognized Mr. Heredia for locating a mother and child in the area, praising his exceptional work in bringing closure to families. He also commented on Bill AB495, encouraging the community to voice their concerns regarding the bill's presentation.
Councilmember Strohman expressed gratitude to EPF for their continued hard work. He sought Council consensus to draft a letter to the Sacramento legislature opposing Bill AB495 and directed staff to bring the item forward at the next meeting.
Strohman also acknowledged Mr. Heredia for locating a mother and child, suggesting the Council consider formally recognizing his efforts, especially given media attention noting the incident was near Escalon.
Additionally, he raised concerns about the grades on the west side of Main Street Park and sought Council consensus to discuss potentially leveling at least the west side to provide a more accessible, level surface for event attendees.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker expressed enthusiasm for the upcoming start of the paved park project and highlighted the importance of enhancing public engagement through regular updates and communication.
She commended staff and Councilmembers Kay and Strohman for their work with SSJID in advancing the matter for Escalon residents. Walker also raised concerns about the Highway 120 and Elisabeth Street crossing, thanking CM French for looking into the cost of a HOC system. She concluded by inviting the community to attend the final Farmer's Market of the season.
Mayor Hagan expressed his gratitude to EPF for their dedication and hard work, acknowledging their positive contributions to the community. He noted that the skate park is a long-desired project that th ommunity has been eager to see realized
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Hagan adjourned the meeting at approximately 10:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Michelebates
Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk