AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
MEETING OF MARCH 2, 2026
City Council Chambers, 2060 McHenry Avenue - 7:00 P.M.
Beginning Resolution No. 08-26
Beginning Ordinance No. 602
Beginning Minute Order No. 13-26
The following alternatives are available to members of the public to observe these meetings: As a courtesy to the public, and technology permitting, the public may also choose to observe and participate remotely as set forth below. Please be advised and warned that, in the event of a disruption, disturbance, or disconnection of remote access (via phone or GoTo Meeting) for any reason, such remote access may be suspended or eliminated, without notice. Therefore, remote participants are encouraged to attend in person (rather than via phone or Goto Meeting) to ensure they have every opportunity to participate in the meeting. Remote access is only provided as a courtesy to the public, but the City does not guarantee against any interruption, disturbance, disruption, or cessation of such remote access to the meeting. The City Council meeting will still proceed as agendized in the event of such disconnection or disturbance.
WATCH
Live stream of the City Council meetings at
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=city+of+escalon Live stream of the City Council meetings via your computer, tablet, or smartphone at:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323691381
(Please note, you may be required to download the app to view the meeting) You can also dial in using your phone
United States + 1 (408) 650-3123
One Touch tel:+14086503123,,323691381#
Access Code: 323-691-381
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk, 209-691-7400 or email [email protected]. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 35.102-
35.104 ADA Title II)
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Andrew Hagan
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Andrew Hagan
ROLL CALL Mayor Andrew Hagan
Mayor Pro Tem Malinda Walker
Councilmember Jeremy Engle
Councilmember Shawn Strohman
Councilmember Jeff Kay
PRESENTATIONS
1. Swearing In of Officer Adam Westphal
2. Strategic Plan Quarterly Update
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on February 17, 2026
4. Approve the Register of Demands – February 24, 2026 in the Amount of $1,056,899.30
5. Rename Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Memorial Park
6. Opposition to Assembly Bill 1421 (Wilson)
7. Consider Adopting Resolution Nos. XX-26 and XX-26 Accepting Easement Deeds for Public Utility Purposes on Portions of Real Property Identified as APNs 227-180-420-000 and 227-180-350-000, Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Certificates of Acceptance; and Consent to Recordation in the Official Records of the County of San Joaquin
8. Consider Final Acceptance of the Roosevelt Water Valve Replacement Project and Authorize the Deputy City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion These items are considered routine in nature and are acted upon by a single action unless requested by an individual Council Member or member of the public for special consideration.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS & UPDATES
MATTERS PRESENTED FROM THE AUDIENCE
The public may address the City Council on any item that is on the Agenda at the time the item is called. The public may also address the City Council on any item not on the Agenda that is within the subject matter of the City of Escalon. Each speaker is limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes. Unused time may not be yielded to another speaker. You may state your name and address for the record; however, it is not required. Due to state law, action will not be taken on an item that is not on the Agenda and except for brief responses, the Council is prohibited from discussing any item not on the agenda. If it requires action, it will be referred to staff and/or placed on a future Agenda. The determination of whether an item is within the subject matter of the City is a discretionary decision made by the Mayor.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. Introduce and Waive the First Reading (by title only) of Ordinance No. XXX Amending Section
17.41.140 of the Escalon Municipal Code Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units to Comply with Recent Changes in State Law, and Finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21080.17
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
10. Update on Staff Cost to Process Fireworks Booth Applications
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
LEVINE ACT PUBLIC PARTY/APPLICANT DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS:
Applicants, parties, and their agents who have made campaign contributions totaling more than $250 (aggregated) to a Councilmember over the past 12 months, must publicly disclose that fact for the official record of that agenda item. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution aggregated, and the name(s) of the campaign contributor(s) and Councilmember(s). The disclosure may be made either in writing to the City Clerk prior to the agenda item consideration, or by verbal disclosure at the time of the agenda item consideration.
The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice, nor a recitation of all legal requirements and obligations of parties/applicants and their agents. Parties and agents are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law.
SB 343 NOTICE
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk at City Hall during normal business hours at 2060 McHenry Avenue. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this Agenda.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk, certify under penalty of perjury, under the State of California, that the Escalon City Council Agenda for the Meeting of Monday, March 2, 2026 was posted 72 hours prior to the meeting in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, in the area designated below on Thursday, February 26, 2026.
Escalon City Hall
2060 McHenry Avenue
City of Escalon Website
www.cityofescalon.org
Escalon CA 95320
Dated: Thursday, February 26, 2026
Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 4 of 95
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 6 of 95
2025–2026
STRATEGIC
PLAN
Q4 Update
MARCH 2026
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
1. Establish an Economic Development
Committee by July 1, 2025
2. Develop an Economic Development
Strategic Plan by October 2026
3. Meet with 10 businesses each year
4. Invest in Economic Development.
Create a program by December 2026
1. Adopt a balanced FY 25-26 budget
by July 1, 2025
2. Adopt a clean FY 23-24 financial
audit by April 1, 2025
3. Develop an investment strategy and
grow earned revenue by 50%
4. Reduce City’s CalPERS liability by
10%
FISCAL
STABILITY
C
1. Achieve 100% Officer staffing levels
by December 31, 2025
2. Increase Officer tenure by 1 year by
October 2026
3. Maintain no more than one
probationary officer on the force at
any given time
C
PUBLIC
SAFETY
1. Begin construction on the Surface
Water Project by July 1, 2026
2. Implement Wastewater Treatment
Plan Upgrade Project by October
2026
3. Construct six (6) capital improvement
projects in 2025
C
INFRA
STRUCTURE
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 12 of 95
ITEM NO. 3
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk
Date: February 20, 2026
Subject: Review and Approve the Minutes
Recommendation:
Approve the Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of February 17, 2026.
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2026
City Council Chambers, 2060 McHenry Avenue -7:00 P.M.
Beginning Resolution No. 07-26
Beginning Ordinance No. 602
Beginning Minute Order No. 09-26
PRESENT: Mayor Andrew Hagan
Mayor Pro Tem Malinda Walker
Councilmember Shawn Strohman
Councilmember Jeff Kay
ABSENT: Councilmember Jeremy Engle
STAFF PRESENT: Jaylen French, City Manager (CM)
Celinda Bickner, Finance Director/HR Administrator (FDHRA) Juston Collins, Public Works Superintendent (PWS)
Robert Hardgraves, Chief of Police
Trevin Barber, Development and Community Services Manager (DCSM) Andreas Booher, Legal Counsel
Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk
PRESENTATIONS
1. Check Presentation - Oak Valley Community Bank Support of the City of Escalon 2026 Economic Development Incentive Program
Representatives from Oak Valley Community Bank—Kimberly Karp, Greg Bulder, and Gregory Hoekman—presented the City of Escalon with a $20,000 donation toward the Economic Development Incentive Program. Mayor Hagan accepted the contribution and expressed appreciation for OVCB’s support of the program and the City.
2. Municipal Budget 101 Presentation (City Staff)
FDHRA Bicker provided a presentation outlining the basics of a municipal budget.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on February 2, 2026
4. Approve the Register of Demands – February 11, 2026 in the Amount of $228,805.53
5. Approve Update to the Master Fee Schedule for the Fireworks Stand Application, License, and Deposit Fees, and Adjust Fees for the 2026 Year per Local Consumer Price Index
6. Adopt Resolution No. xx-26 Accepting an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road and Public Utility Easements on a Portion of Real Property Commonly Known as 1230 Brennan Road (APN 225-020-450-000), and Authorize the City Manager to Execute said Offer, and Consent to Recordation in the Official Records, County of San Joaquin
7. Approve 2026 Gilton Solid Waste Management Summary Rate Increase
Councilmember Strohman requested to pull Item No. 5.
MOTION: it was m/s by STROHMAN/KAY to approve Items Numbers 3, 4, 6 and 7 as presented.
Motion carried 4-0-1 (Engle Absent). MINUTE ORDER 09-26 Councilmember Strohman expressed reservation about the fireworks booth fees, noting that the booths are operated by community non-profits and therefore the fees impact their fundraising efforts. He compared the fees to city business license charges, indicating that the two fees should be more comparable. He desired for the fees to be significantly reduced or eliminated.
CM French stated that fees can be reduced through a decision of the council and that fees are set through studies that evaluate the amount of staff time and administrative effort required to complete the task.
Based on the explanation, Mayor Pro Tem Walker sought clarification that processing a business license requires less staff time than a fireworks application, to which CM French confirmed that that is what the fee study indicated. The Council suggested that it may be prudent to re-evaluate the fireworks related fees to ensure they are commensurate with the effort required.
Councilmember Kay acknowledged that there are more applicants than available permits issued through the City’s lottery, which creates additional steps for staff when processing fireworks booth paperwork and refunds.
Public Comment Opened at 7:40 p.m.
None
Public Comment Closed at 7:40 p.m.
Councilmembers Strohman inquired how quickly staff can gather the information requested regarding staff time and fees. CM French responded that an informal analysis can be completed by the next Council meeting.
MOTION – it was m/s STROHMAN/KAY to Table Item No. 5 To Send Back to Staff to Return with an Analysis at the Next Council Meeting. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Engle Absent). MINUTE ORDER 10-26
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS AND UPDATES
8. January Updates
a. Treasurer’s Report
b. Police Department Report
c. Animal Control Report
d. Recreation Report
e. Development Services Report
f. Public Works Report
g. Building Department
h. Water Department Report
i. Waste Water Treatment Plant Report
j. City Manager’s Report (Verbal)
DCSM Barber reported on a successful basketball season and announced baseball and softball’s Opening Day is scheduled for March 7th. He also provided updates on pending Spark Grant distributions and shared that the Economic Development Committee met with GO-Biz to discuss Opportunity Zones 2.0 and received a progress report from BEAM Circular on a proposed bio-based manufacturing test facility in Stanislaus County.
FDHRA Bicker provided updates on the Treasurer’s Report, quarterly financials, investment earnings, and Measure P funds.
Chief Hardgraves reported an increase in car thefts in January, with officers increasing patrolling in response. Officer Gunter led the department in arrests (13) and citations (18). He also announced that Adam Westphal had joined the Department and is slated to be sworn in at the next Council meeting.
PWS Supervisor Collins and CM French had no updates.
MATTERS PRESENTED BY THE AUDIENCE
None
PUBLIC HEARING
None
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
9. Consider Proposed Escalon Community Center Action Plan DCSM Barber presented an action plan to increase the Escalon Community Center use.
Mayor Hagan appreciated the report but recommended evaluating parking prior to implementation of the entire plan, and recommended consulting Chief Hardgraves regarding alcohol and security considerations.
Councilmember Kay supported the near-term ideas in the plan, and described them as phenomenal. He requested more detail on the long-term proposals before moving forward.
Councilmember Strohman commended DCSM Barber for the creative approach and recommended moving forward if costs are minimal and staff support the ideas.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker emphasized the need for on-site security if alcohol is served and noted that events involving children must be fully evaluated before allowing alcohol. She supported the concept of rental packages but raised concerns about staffing capacity to prepare, manage, and follow up on events.
Public Comment Opened at 8:17 p.m.
None
Public Comment Closed at 8:17 p.m.
CM French stated that staff will follow up on Council’s comments, evaluate how the proposals can be implemented, and bring any necessary items back to a future meeting for final approval.
10. Agenda Item Request to Consider Renaming Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Park CM French presented the agenda item request by Councilmember Strohman, supported by Mayor Pro Tem Walker, and accompanied by eight (8) letters of support.
Councilmember Strohman and Mayor Pro Tem Walker both reflected on Danny Fox’s deep involvement in Escalon as a police officer, councilmember, mayor, mentor, and community advocate. They highlighted his dedication, accessibility, and the lasting trust he fostered within the community.
Public Comment Opened at 8:24 p.m.
Resident Sherry Hill questioned whether a physical improvement or name was most appropriate to honor Mr. Fox.
Residents Kurt Danziger, Peter Krumeich, Casey Silva, Krandall Vandergriff and Robert Swift, all expressed strong support for renaming the park after Danny Fox, emphasizing his pride in the park, his kindness, mentorship, and love for the community. Overall, the speakers consistently recognized Danny Fox’s significant contributions and endorsed honoring him through the park’s renaming.
Public Comment Closed 8:35 p.m.
Councilmember Strohman commented that he liked the idea of the park bench but noted that Mr. Fox loved Dinosaur Park and spent a lot of time taking care of it.
MOTION – it was m/s STROHMAN/WALKER to Consider Renaming Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Park to Honor a Fine Gentleman with the City of Escalon. Motion carried 3-0-1-1 (Abstain – Kay, Absent – Engle) MINUTE ORDER 11-26
11. Agenda Item Request to Consider Resolution Opposing Any Proposed Vehicle Mile Tax as Advanced in AB 1421 (Wilson) - Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee
CM French presented the agenda item request by Councilmember Strohman, supported by Councilmember Kay, explaining the details of the bill, which seeks a state committee evaluation of a road use or vehicle milage tax.
Councilmember Strohman expressed concern that many local residents commute and could be significantly impacted. He stated his desire for an opposition resolution to stand up for residents.
Councilmember Kay added that the proposal would impact everyday drivers, businesses, and the State’s economy. He also raised concerns about double taxation and noted that diesel prices could be especially affected.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker stated she does not support new taxes or unnecessary government tracking and noted her support for the letter issued by Supervisor Rickman addressing these concerns.
Public Comment Opened at 8:43 p.m.
None
Public Comment Closed at 8:43 p.m.
MOTION – it was m/s by STROHMAN/WALKER to Adopt Resolution XX-26 Opposing Assembly Bill 1421 Which Extends the Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee and Directs California Transportation Commission to Compile Research and Deliver a Full to Lawmakers by January 1, 2027.
Motion carried 4-0-1 (Engle Absent). MINUTE ORDER 12-26
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Councilmember Kay commended the Public Works Department for keeping the streets free of flooding during the recent rainstorms, noting that other cities experienced issues. He also praised Officer Gunter for doing an excellent job and expressed his appreciation for his service to the City.
Councilmember Strohman thanked Oak Valley Community Bank for its continued support of the community. He also expressed appreciation to staff for their hard work and commended FDHRA Bickner on her budget presentation. Additionally, he thanked the Council and the community for their support in renaming Dinosaur Park to honor Danny Fox, noting how much the recognition means to the family and to him personally.
Mayor Pro Tem Walker also thanked Oak Valley Community Bank and expressed her excitement about the partnership, noting she looks forward to continued investment in the community. She encouraged residents to shop local and support one another. She also shared her dissatisfaction with actions at the
federal level of government, which she said makes her especially grateful for the strength and unity of the local community.
Mayor Hagan expressed appreciation for staff’s efforts. He then requested Council consensus to reach out to current landowners to discuss their plans with the property. Councilmember Kay supported the outreach.
CLOSED SESSION
None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Hagan adjourned the meeting at approximately 8:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
____________________________
Michele Bates, Deputy City Clerk
ITEM NO.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 02, 2026
Prepared By: Courtney Richmond, Accounting Technician
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Approval of Register of Demands – February 24, 2026, for $1,056,899.30 Recommendation:
Approval of the Register of Demands for the amount of $1,056,899.30 for the period beginning February 10, 2026, and ending on February 23, 2026, pursuant to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget adopted on 6/16/2025.
Attachments
Attached is the check register report for the period indicated above in which items were paid in conformity with City policies and procedures from available funds.
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 2
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT ARC02 ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
I-TI761000AR3 FUEL D 2/23/2026 4,487.18 001352 4,487.18 ATT06 AT&T MOBILITY
I-X02102026 MONTHLY CELL PHONES D 2/23/2026 1,341.08 001353 1,341.08 MOD03 MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
I-202602195675 MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT D 2/23/2026 12,847.02 001354 12,847.02 MTM01 MTM TRANSIT LLC
I-112025 TRANSIT SERVICES NOV 2025 D 2/23/2026 22,643.95 001355 22,643.95 PAC02 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
I-202602205678 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC D 2/23/2026 20,399.82 001356 20,399.82 VIS01 VISA
I-ANDOH022026 BLUEHOST D 2/23/2026 3.99 001357
I-BARBER022026 CALED TRAINING RFND/PARKING D 2/23/2026 27.45 001357 I-BATES022026 CAL CITIES CONFERENCE D 2/23/2026 650.00 001357 I-COLLINS022026 MAINTENANCE CARE MEMBERSHIP D 2/23/2026 75.00 001357 I-HARDGRAVES022026 LODGING/OFFICE CHAIRS D 2/23/2026 2,830.55 001357 I-RICHMOND022026 TONER/OFFICE SUPPLIES/FAUCETS D 2/23/2026 3,075.37 001357 6,662.36 OAK08 NUTTER, DALTON
I-48718 (6)AMER 3600/(6)RE-KEY/PADLOCK V 2/09/2026 595.00 083644 595.00 OAK08 NUTTER, DALTON
M-CHECK BLEVINS, RONALD UNPOST V 2/12/2026 083644 595.00CR ESC09 ESCALON LITTLE LEAGUE
I-202602115645 12U 2026 BASEBALL REG FEES R 2/11/2026 3,100.00 083670 I-202602115646 14U 2026 SOFTBALL REG FEES R 2/11/2026 700.00 083670 I-202602115647 14U 2026 BASEBALL REG FEES R 2/11/2026 2,100.00 083670 5,900.00 SAN01 SAN JOAQUIN CO AUDITOR-CONTROL
I-202602115648 CO PARKING CITE FEES JAN 2026 R 2/11/2026 171.00 083671 171.00 OAK08 NUTTER, DALTON
I-48718 (6)AMER 3600/(6)RE-KEY/PADLOCK R 2/12/2026 Reissue 083672 595.00 DUR05 DURAN, DANIEL
I-202602185650 JAN 2026 KARATE 6YRS-12YRS R 2/20/2026 513.75 083673 I-202602205677 FEB 2026 KARATE 6YRS-ADULT R 2/20/2026 746.25 083673 1,260.00
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 3
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 1 209 SPEEDWAY KARTERS
I-202602195673 DEP RFND R 2/23/2026 500.00 083674 500.00 BAS02 BASS JR., DANIEL
I-202602185655 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 49.50 083675 I-202602185656 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/14/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083675 82.50 BES07 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
I-1053335 ATTORNEY CONTRACT JAN 2025 R 2/23/2026 12,978.00 083676 I-1053337 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JAN 2026 R 2/23/2026 1,759.10 083676 I-1053338 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JAN 2026 R 2/23/2026 323.10 083676 15,060.20 CAL13 CALNET
I-000024815370 SCADA PHONE LINE R 2/23/2026 145.12 083677 145.12 CAP04 CAPITOL BARRICADE, INC.
I-186633 (2) STREET SIGNS R 2/23/2026 130.07 083678 130.07 CCP01 C&C PORTABLE TOILETS INC
I-21226 PORTABLE TOILET-SHOOTING RANGE R 2/23/2026 245.10 083679 245.10 CSG01 CSG CONSULTANTS INC
I-64594 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II R 2/23/2026 3,172.50 083680 I-64692 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS R 2/23/2026 4,865.00 083680 I-64836 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS R 2/23/2026 164.00 083680 I-B260040 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS R 2/23/2026 10,518.29 083680 I-F260027 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS R 2/23/2026 966.00 083680 19,685.79 DAT03 DATA TICKET INC
I-190245 MONTHLY DAILY CITATIONS R 2/23/2026 200.00 083681 200.00 DEP03 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
I-021189 FINGERPRINTS R 2/23/2026 183.00 083682 183.00
DEP04 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
I-E 2254442 SA DUMBWAITER INSPECTION R 2/23/2026 225.00 083683 225.00 DIG02 DIGIULIO, SHELBY
I-202602235682 WRKS COMP/WAGE REPLACEMENT R 2/23/2026 2,773.52 083684 2,773.52 DUG03 DUGO, BRIAN
I-202602185651 REFUND (1) BASEBALL SPONSOR R 2/23/2026 300.00 083685 300.00
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 4
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT ESC09 ESCALON LITTLE LEAGUE
I-202602185649 TRANSFER BASEBALL SPONSORSHIP R 2/23/2026 500.00 083686 500.00 ESC17 GLEN E LANGUM & GARY L LANGUM
I-56035 TIRES/BALANCE/DISPOSAL FEE R 2/23/2026 803.16 083687 803.16 ESC21 209 MULTIMEDIA CORP
I-412322 LEGAL AD:26-021 PUBLIC NOTICE R 2/23/2026 80.00 083688 80.00 ESC21 209 MULTIMEDIA CORP
I-412640 LEGAL AD#26-024 CBDG/HOME PROG R 2/23/2026 80.00 083689 80.00 FAR01 FARMER'S BLACKSMITH & WELDING
I-763394 AIR HOSE/COUPLER/FITTINGS R 2/23/2026 54.25 083690 I-765752 (18PC) T-HANDLE HEX KEY R 2/23/2026 82.96 083690 137.21 FGL01 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY INC
I-630969A INDUSTRIAL WATER TESTING R 2/23/2026 52.00 083691 I-631210A DRINKING WATER TESTING R 2/23/2026 220.00 083691 I-631647A DRINKING WATER TESTING R 2/23/2026 234.00 083691 I-631676A DRINKING WATER TESTING R 2/23/2026 104.00 083691 610.00 FRO03 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
I-202602185671 911 MONTHLY TELEPHONE R 2/23/2026 84.00 083692 84.00 GAR07 GARTON TRACTOR
I-W0954206 TRACTOR REPAIR/SERVICE R 2/23/2026 1,866.85 083693 1,866.85 GOR01 GORDON, ROGER
I-20262 GRAZING FOR WEED CONTROL WWTP R 2/23/2026 2,000.00 083694 2,000.00 HILL01 BRIAN SCOTT HILL
I-9561 (2) OBD/NON OBD EMISSIONS TEST R 2/23/2026 320.00 083695 320.00 I.C01 I.C. INK
I-5467 BUSINESS CARDS-HAGAN/WALKER R 2/23/2026 121.44 083696 121.44 JSW01 WELLS, JUSTIN
I-871 ELECTRICAL WORK-SANCHEZ PUMP R 2/23/2026 605.60 083697 I-882 ELECTRICAL WORK-SANCHEZ PUMP R 2/23/2026 2,649.01 083697 3,254.61 KRO03 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN &
I-30917042 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R 2/23/2026 3,490.50 083698 3,490.50
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 5
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT LAN01 LANDMARK HEALTHPLAN OF CA INC
I-202602235683 LANDMARK HEALTHPLAN OF CA INC R 2/23/2026 263.86 083699 263.86 LOU03 LOURENCO, MICHAEL
I-202602185665 BASKETBALL REF TRAINING R 2/23/2026 99.00 083700 99.00 MAR03 MARTINEZ, DONOVAN
I-202602185664 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083701 33.00 MAR07 MARTINEZ, CAIN
I-202602185661 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083702 I-202602185663 BASKETBALL REFEREE 1/31/26 R 2/23/2026 66.00 083702 I-202602205679 BASKETBALL REFEREE 1/24/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083702 I-202602205680 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/14/26 R 2/23/2026 66.00 083702 198.00 MIS02 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY
I-525408839 RUG/TOWEL-COMM CTR R 2/23/2026 31.56 083703 I-525408842 RUG/TOWEL-CH R 2/23/2026 39.35 083703
I-525492694 RUG/TOWEL/UNIFORM-PW R 2/23/2026 79.43 083703 I-525492700 RUG/TOWEL-COMM CTR R 2/23/2026 31.56 083703 I-525543812 RUG/TOWEL/UNIFORM-PW R 2/23/2026 72.83 083703 254.73 MIS03 CAR WASH PARTNERS, LLC
I-240019 (7) PATROL WASHES JAN 2026 R 2/23/2026 163.80 083704 163.80 PAC01 PACIFIC STATES PETROLEUM
I-FEB2095-IN 520 GALLON FUEL TANK RENTAL R 2/23/2026 177.73 083705 177.73 PAC03 AT&T
I-202602235681 MONTHLY TELEPHONE R 2/23/2026 207.26 083706 207.26 PAC07 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST IRRIGATION
I-322527 IRRIGATION REPAIR R 2/23/2026 109.24 083707 109.24 PAR07 PARKS WHOLESALE NURSERY
I-2026-1002 (6)TREES/(10) SHRUB/POLES R 2/23/2026 545.22 083708 545.22 PL01 P & L CONCRETE PRODUCTS/FOLSOM
I-7013852 (40YD) COBBLES R 2/23/2026 2,990.63 083709
I-7014100 (5YD) CONCRETE SAND R 2/23/2026 353.44 083709 3,344.07 POW03 POWERHOUSE DANCE STUDIO, INC.
I-202602185652 DANCE LESSONS 1/13/26-2/17/26 R 2/23/2026 450.00 083710 450.00
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 6
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT RBC01 CORE & MAIN LP
I-Y412451 SHUT-OFF VALVE/FITTINGS R 2/23/2026 908.22 083711 I-Y412525 WATER MAIN PIPE/FITTINGS R 2/23/2026 2,362.19 083711 I-Y513645 PIPE EPOXY COUPLING R 2/23/2026 1,142.74 083711 4,413.15 RUS02 RUSH, DARCY
I-202602185666 BASKETBALL REF TRAINING R 2/23/2026 99.00 083712 I-202602185667 BASKETBALL REFEREE 1/24/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083712 I-202602185668 BASKETBALL REFEREE 1/31/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083712 I-202602185669 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083712 I-202602185670 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/14/26 R 2/23/2026 49.50 083712 247.50 RUS03 RUSH, MARY ANN
I-202602185653 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083713 I-202602185654 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/14/26 R 2/23/2026 49.50 083713 82.50 SOU01 SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION D
I-0009413 FIXED COSTS- JAN 2026 R 2/23/2026 44.41 083714 44.41 STR01 STRAND ACE HARDWARE INC.
I-682767 TOWELS/TOILET PAPER/GAS CAN R 2/23/2026 84.78 083715 I-683816 UTILITY KNIFE/ LANDSCAPE PIN R 2/23/2026 52.17 083715 I-683870 LANDSCAPE PIN 6" 100PK R 2/23/2026 43.48 083715 I-684463 PRIMER PVC/ELBOW/BUSHING/TEE R 2/23/2026 159.11 083715 I-684530 ELBOW/ADAPTR/BUSHING/UNION SCH R 2/23/2026 69.24 083715 I-684531 (1) EMITTER TUBING R 2/23/2026 36.96 083715
I-684533 ADAPTR SCH/COUPLE/UNION SCH R 2/23/2026 20.63 083715 I-684614 90 DEGREE ELBOW R 2/23/2026 8.25 083715
I-684616 (1) EMITTER TUBING R 2/23/2026 36.96 083715
I-684818 (4) LINCH PINS R 2/23/2026 8.44 083715
I-684837 3" TRANSFER PUMP R 2/23/2026 734.00 083715
I-684838 GRAPHITE LUBE SPRAY R 2/23/2026 19.55 083715
I-684967 UTILITY KNIFE R 2/23/2026 33.69 083715
I-685008 (1) CONN WIRE R 2/23/2026 2.82 083715
I-685031 TOGGLE SWITCHS/WIRE CUTTER R 2/23/2026 48.45 083715 I-685032 (1) SUN SHADE R 2/23/2026 70.68 083715
I-685035 (3) LIQUID BLEACH R 2/23/2026 40.64 083715
I-685151 LAWN FERTILIZER/PUSH SPREADER R 2/23/2026 105.47 083715 I-685285 GROUND ADAPTER 3 OUTLETS R 2/23/2026 8.25 083715 I-685334 CABLE TIE/PLIERS R 2/23/2026 67.38 083715
I-685348 PIPE INSULATION R 2/23/2026 59.06 083715
I-685382 NYALOX WIRE CUP/STRAINR WRNCH R 2/23/2026 60.42 083715 I-685413 DRILL BRUSH SET/WIRE HOOK R 2/23/2026 29.99 083715 I-685448 ANCHOR/PICTURE HANGING KIT R 2/23/2026 51.07 083715 1,851.49
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 7
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT TRI04 TRIMBLE, JAYCI
I-202602185659 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/14/26 R 2/23/2026 33.00 083716 I-202602185660 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/7/26 R 2/23/2026 49.50 083716 82.50 USB02 U.S. BANK
I-3146182 ESCALON 2018 WASTEWATER R 2/23/2026 145,981.11 083717 145,981.11 VAL11 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SERVI
I-CL 26-959814 FUEL R 2/23/2026 987.36 083718
I-INV-26-992968 WELL PUMP OIL R 2/23/2026 763.69 083718 1,751.05 VEL02 VELASCO, ARIANNA
I-202602185658 BASKETBALL REFEREE 2/07/26 R 2/23/2026 49.50 083719 49.50 WES30 WESTURF
I-1044514 (2) SEED TROPHY R 2/23/2026 372.35 083720 372.35 WIN05 WING, ANNETTE
I-202602205676 YOGA CLASS 1/8/26 -2/12/26 R 2/23/2026 900.00 083721 900.00 4LEAF 4LEAF, INC.
I-J4190-25-12 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT R 2/23/2026 1,250.00 083722 1,250.00 AUT01 AUTREYS SWEEPING LLC
I-48888 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES R 2/23/2026 1,807.69 083723 1,807.69 BEA01 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS
I-29263 QUARTERLY SIGNAL MAINT. R 2/23/2026 250.00 083724 250.00 GEO01 GEORGE REED INC
I-2 MAIN ST BIKE & PED IMPROV R 2/23/2026 296,689.27 083725 296,689.27 GRE06 GREEN VALLEY TREE SERVICE, INC
I-6738 HOGAN PARK-TREE REMOVAL R 2/23/2026 18,400.00 083726 18,400.00 INS03 RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC
I-393170 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393176 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393182 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393187 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393192 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393208 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393217 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 I-393226 MONTHLY PES CONTROL SERV R 2/23/2026 52.76 083727 422.08
2/25/2026 7:11 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 8
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Escalon, CA
BANK: OPOOL OAK VALLEY POOL CASH
DATE RANGE: 2/10/2026 THRU 2/23/2026
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT INT06 INTERNATIONAL TELE-PATH
I-SI-269838 RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT R 2/23/2026 401.00 083728 401.00 MID15 HALCYON CREEK INC
I-990 MONTHLY IT SERVICES R 2/23/2026 7,518.76 083729 7,518.76 OAK02 CITY OF OAKDALE
I-39 SHELTER SERVICES R 2/23/2026 13,113.50 083730 13,113.50 RIP01 CITY OF RIPON
I-7237 MONTHLY DISPATCH SERVICES R 2/23/2026 15,135.72 083731 I-7238 MONTHLY DISPATCH SERVICES R 2/23/2026 156.58 083731 15,292.30 SAN24 SANTANDER BANK, N.A.
I-202602195674 VAC-CON VACUUM TRUCK R 2/23/2026 410,817.75 083732 410,817.75 TYL01 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES
I-CI100-00257699 UTILITY ONLINE/WEBSITE R 2/23/2026 130.00 083733 130.00 * * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT REGULAR CHECKS: 64 987,922.89 0.00 988,517.89
HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 6 68,381.41 0.00 68,381.41
EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 1 VOID DEBITS 595.00
VOID CREDITS 595.00CR 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: OPOOL TOTALS: 71 1,056,899.30 0.00 1,056,899.30 BANK: OPOOL TOTALS: 71 1,056,899.30 0.00 1,056,899.30
REPORT TOTALS: 71 1,056,899.30 0.00 1,056,899.30
ITEM NO. 5
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Jaylen French, City Manager
Date: February 23, 2026
Subject: Rename Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Memorial Park Recommendation:
Consider renaming Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Memorial Park.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This item is not directly applicable to a Strategic Priority of the adopted Escalon 2025-2026 Strategic Plan.
Background Information:
Councilmember Strohman submitted an Agenda Item Request Form on February 1, 2026 with support from Mayor Pro Tem Walker to “Consider renaming the current Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Park, in memory of former community member Danny Fox.” The request continues, “Danny gave the later part of his adult life to making Escalon a better place to live both professionally and for his service on the City Council. Danny was a 19-year veteran of the Escalon Police Department, most recognizably as the D.A.R.E. officer.” “Following his retirement in 2001, Danny then became an active member of Escalon City government.” “Danny served on the Escalon City Council from 2006 to 2018, and was Mayor for the City of Escalon from 2010 to 2012.” “Following his completion on City Council, Danny spent countless hours maintaining Dinosaur Park, assisting Public Works crews on mitigating the various gophers as well as ensuring that it was a quiet place for families to gather…” On February 17, 2026, a majority of the Escalon City Council, at their regularly scheduled meeting, directed staff to proceed with the name change of the park per the above. This item is the implementation of that direction and includes a resolution, which is the formal mechanism to rename a public facility.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with renaming a City park.
Attachments:
1. Agenda Item Request and Letters in Support
2. Resolution
Escalon City Council
2060 McHenry
Escalon, CA 95320
January 20, 2026
Dear Councilmembers,
I am excited to hear about the possible renaming of Dinosaur Park in Escalon as a means of honoring one of our beloved citizens, Danny Fox. This would be a true tribute and remembrance to a great local leader and role model.
While it is still difficult to believe Danny is not with us anymore, considering renaming the park would keep his memory and countless achievements alive.
He left an indelible impression of leadership, kindness, small town friendliness and caring for his fellow Escalonians that those who loved him will carry with them for the rest of their lives. He was truly an example to follow.
I have always felt that when a part of our community is renamed in honor of one of its beloved citizens, be it a park, sports field, street, or any other place to place their name, it keeps their memory alive for future generations. In this way, Escalonians yet unborn will have the opportunity to someday learn who those people that have made the place they cherish and call home were. You as councilmembers now have the ability to cement the memory of yet another one of our local greats into our history, to be known for generations to come.
Thank you for your consideration,
Robert Swift
Lifelong Citizen of Escalon
209 595 5013
1534 Catherine Ave
[email protected]
January 27, 2026
Re: Danny Fox Park
To the Escalon City Council,
I wanted to voice my support for naming the "Dinosaur Park" after former Escalon Police Lieutenant, Councilmember and Mayor Danny Fox. Although I first met Danny when he cut my hair at Da Fox, I really came to appreciate his love and care for the community while serving on Council together. I appreciate the idea of recognizing Danny with this park, a place he cared for and dedicated his time, much as he did in a life of service to our community. Thank you for recognizing such a deserving public servant and thank you for considering this honor for Danny and his family.
Respectfully,
Jeff Laugero
David Bellinger
1420 Winterbrook Street
Escalon, CA 95320
1/21/2026
Shawn Strohman and Council
C/O Escalon
Dear Shawn Strohman and Council:
In my capacity as a former City Councilmember and Mayor of the City of Escalon, I would like to formally express my support for renaming Dinosaur Park in recognition of Danny Fox.
Sincerely,
David Bellinger
To the sitting members of the Escalon City Council
Dated December 10, 2025
Endorsement by Former City of Escalon Councilmember Peter Krumeich to rename The Dinosaur Park to The Danny Fox Memorial Park.
Danny Fox was a friend of mine and an upstanding citizen for the City of Escalon. He served faithfully on the City Council, was a Police Officer, and contribuled to many activities throughout the City. His kindness and general good nature were evident to me over the years and we had many fruitful discussions about the general welfare of the local community. My own children have spent many hours playing at the Dinosaur Park and we have experienced many good times there. I am proud to offer my endorsement for the renaming of the Dinosaur Park to the Danny Fox Memorial Park. This is a small gesture. but one I feel is appropriate to honor the life and legacy of our great citizen and friend Danny Fox.
Thank you,
Peter Krumeich
Former City Councilmember and Local Business Operator
To Escalon City Council:
This letter is in reference to support an agenda item requesting of a name change and dedication for a local city park. The park located at the corner of Escalon Bellota Road and Libby known locally as, “The Dinosaur Park” has been a fixture for years. Recently the community of Escalon has lost a beloved son, Danny Fox. Danny was a former business owner, former Escalon Police Department Lieutenant, City councilman and former Mayor of this city we call home. His generosity and dedication to this community was well known, and his legacy and memory can be engraved into this community with a dedication in his name to this park. Danny Fox lived just blocks away from this very park. He would walk by it daily, spend time with his grandchildren there and was often seen there volunteering his time beautifying that park with his own funds and labor. Personally, I feel this would be a tremendous honor to an individual that dedicated so much of his life to this community of Escalon.
Thank you,
Nick Caton
EUSD Board of Trustee and former Board President
Realtor/ Manager PMZ Real Estate Escalon, Oakdale , Ripon 209.380.7083 [email protected]
January 23, 2026
Dear City Councilmembers:
I wish to add my 100% support for the renaming of Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Park. Danny was my friend and confidant for over 15 years. His easy going spirit, love of friends and family, willingness to support people and causes in Escalon was his calling.
His love and service to Escalon spanned decades from businessman, retired Lieutenant EPD, City Councilman, Mayor and so many more service activities that have benefited our community.
Danny was a de facto caretaker, liaison between the Park and the Public Works dept. for Dinosaur Park. He planted shade trees there, took his grandchildren there and overall cared for it..
As a fitting gesture of recognition and appreciation, I would ask that the Escalon City Council rename Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Park and have a dedication ceremony with plaque for the public to celebrate our great citizen.
In remembrance,
Kurt and Cindy Danziger
February 21, 2026
To whom it may concern:
This letter is in support of memorializing the “Dinosaur Park” to Danny A. Fox. I knew Danny for many years and walked with him almost every morning. He would always talk about the Dinosaur Park, from planting shrubs in honor of his significant other, Peggy Rocha, to trying to get rid of all the gophers. Danny spent a lot of time at this park, keeping it neat and trying to beautify it.
Danny is missed by many in our community, and I think the park should be named in his honor.
Sincerely,
Krandall Vandagriff
ATTACHMENT 2
Res No. XX-26
RESOLUTION NO. XX-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
FORMALLY RENAMING DINOSAUR PARK TO DANNY FOX MEMORIAL PARK WHEREAS, the City of Escalon maintains a formal process to name or dedicate a facility or space within the City, which consists of approval by the majority of the City Council, stemming from a request initiated by the public, the Council or another entity; and WHEREAS, an Agenda Item Request was initiated by Councilmember Strohman, and supported by Mayor Pro Tem Walker, to consider renaming Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Memorial Park; and
WHEREAS, letters from eight community members in support of renaming the park were provided to the City; and
WHEREAS, Danny Fox was a police officer and lieutenant for the Escalon Police Department from 1982 to 2001, and served on the Escalon City Council from 2006 to 2018, serving as Mayor from 2010 to 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escalon that:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby approve the name change of Dinosaur Park to Danny Fox Memorial Park.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Escalon at a regular meeting held this 2nd day of March 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
ANDREW HAGAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
MICHELE BATES, Deputy City Clerk
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 38 of 95
ITEM NO. 6___
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Jaylen French, City Manager
Date: February 23, 2026
Subject: Opposition to Assembly Bill 1421 (Wilson)
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution XX-26 opposing Assembly Bill 1421 (Wilson) which advances the concept of a road usage or vehicle mile tax.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This item is not directly applicable to a Strategic Priority of the adopted Escalon 2025-2026 Strategic Plan.
Background:
According to the author, AB 1421 seeks to create a research-driven process to inform future transportation funding decisions to replace declining gas tax revenues. The Bill advances the concept of a road usage tax or a vehicle mile tax.
Existing law requires the Chair of the California Transportation Commission to create a Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation to guide the development and evaluation of a pilot program assessing the potential for mileage-based revenue collection as an alternative to the gas tax system. AB 1421 would extend the operation of the committee and their efforts and fast-track the findings of the committee.
In January 2026, the California Assembly approved AB 1421 (Wilson) by a vote of 49 (aye) to 21 (no) and will be undertaking further study of a road-user charge or mileage-based fee system.
Discussion:
The Escalon City Council recognizes the importance of maintaining sustainable transportation funding and thus a sustainable transportation system; however, the Council opposes options that unduly impact working families that have limited options other than to drive to work. Rural areas residents are, by nature, required to travel further than those in urban areas due to job dispersion and infeasibility of remote work in most rural industries (particularly agriculture), dispersal of essential services, housing affordability pressures, and the effects of logistic based economies; therefore, a road usage tax or vehicle mileage tax could unfairly burden those in rural environments.
Additionally, such programs would appear to require the use of tracking equipment to record the miles travelled by individual vehicles, which could be an infraction on personal privacy, and on the personal liberty of residents across the state, in violation of the U.S. and California Constitutions.
While the Escalon City Council recognizes that AB 1421 is intended to study options, as currently drafted, it recognizes that the State does not typically study options that it is not considering and therefore, opposes AB 1421, which advances the concept of such a plan, and opposes any future road usage tax or vehicle mileage tax that would affect rural residents without adequate safeguards to protect civil liberties and address urban/rural equity concerns to a greater degree than others.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with opposing a piece of legislation, nor is there a direct fiscal impact associated with a road usage or vehicle mile tax for the City. Such a tax could affect the earning and spending power of residents thus impacting the City’s sale tax generation, and it could affect the gas tax which could have an impact on the City as well.
Attachment:
1. Resolution XX-26 Opposing Assembly Bill 1421 (Wilson)
ATTACHMENT 1
Res No. XX-26
RESOLUTION NO. XX-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 1421 (WILSON) WHICH ADVANCES THE CONCEPT
OF A ROAD USAGE OR VEHICLE MILE TAX
WHEREAS, while the City Council recognizes the importance of maintaining sustainable transportation funding and thus a sustainable transportation system, the Council opposes options that unduly impact working families with limited options other than to drive to work; and WHEREAS, existing law requires the Chair of the California Transportation Commission to create a Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation to guide the development and evaluation of a pilot program assessing the potential for mileage-based revenue collection as an alternative to the gas tax system, and AB 1421 would extend the operation of the committee and their efforts and fast-track the findings of the committee; and
WHEREAS, the California Assembly approved Assembly Bill 1421 (Wilson) in January 2026 by a vote of 49 (aye) to 21 (no) and will be undertaking further study of a road-user charge or mileage-based fee system; and
WHEREAS, in rural areas residents are, by nature, required to travel further than those in urban areas due to job dispersion and infeasibility of remote work in most rural industries (particularly agriculture), dispersal of essential services, housing affordability pressures, and the effects of logistic based economies, therefore, a road usage tax or vehicle mileage tax could unfairly burden those in rural environments; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that, in light of the geographic dispersal of workplaces, essential services and other infrastructure in rural areas, a mileage-based revenue model has the potential to worsen, not rectify, the inequities that led to AB 1421 in the first place; and WHEREAS, further, such programs may require the use of tracking equipment to record the miles travelled by individual vehicles, which is an infraction on personal privacy, and could be an infraction on the personal liberty of residents across the state, in violation of the U.S. and California Constitutions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escalon that:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby oppose AB 1421 and any revision to the California Gas Tax that impacts the privacy of drivers and unduly impacts the residents of rural areas without adequate safeguards to protect civil liberties and address urban/rural equity concerns.
ATTACHMENT 1
Res No. XX-26
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Escalon at a regular meeting held this 2nd day of March 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
ANDREW HAGAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
MICHELE BATES, Deputy City Clerk
ITEM NO. 7
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Diana Trejo, Associate Planner
Date: February 23, 2026
Subject: Consider Adopting Resolution Nos. XX-26 and XX-26 Accepting Easement Deeds for Public Utility Purposes on Portions of Real Property Identified as APNs 227-180-420-000 and 227-180-350-000, Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Certificates of Acceptance, and Consent to Recordation in the Official Records of the County of San Joaquin
Recommendation:
1) Adopt Resolution Nos. XX-26 and XX-26 accepting Easement Deeds for public utility purposes over portions of APNs 227-180-420-000 and 227-180-350-000, and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Certificates of Acceptance, and 3) Consent to recordation in the Official Records of County of San Joaquin.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This item is not directly applicable to a Strategic Priority of the adopted Escalon 2025-2026 Strategic Plan.
Background and Discussion:
On November 20, 2023, the City Council approved Application No. 23-785, a Planned Development Rezone, Site and Architectural Review, and environmental determination for the construction of a 1,250 square foot office, and a 4,750 square foot storage building and property use as a contractor’s storage yard.
As a condition of approval for the project, the applicant was required to grant a 15-foot Public Utility Easement over the abandoned alley area extending from Second Street to Brayton Avenue, located just east of Jackson Avenue, to accommodate and protect the existing public sewer main. The sewer main located within the easement area is a public facility owned and maintained by the City of Escalon.
The project site is located within the block bound by Jackson Avenue, Second Street, California Street, and Brayton Avenue. The existing public sewer main traverses portions of APNs 227-180-350-000 and 227-180-420-000 within the area of the former alley. Although the sewer infrastructure is already installed and operational, a formal recorded easement is necessary to ensure the City retains permanent legal rights for access, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the public utility facilities.
To satisfy this Condition of Approval:
RossMichael LP, owner of APN 227-180-350-000, has executed an Easement Deed granting a Public Utility Easement to the City of Escalon.
RossMichael LLC, owner of APN 227-180-420-000, has executed an Easement Deed granting a Public Utility Easement to the City of Escalon.
Each Easement Deed grants the City a perpetual easement for public utility purposes, including installation, construction, access, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of utility structures and related facilities, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B attached to the respective deeds.
Acceptance and recordation of these Easement Deeds will formalize the City’s legal interest in the easement areas and ensure continued access to maintain and operate the existing public sewer infrastructure in perpetuity.
Formalizing and recording these easements is critical to protecting the City’s long term infrastructure interests. A recorded Public Utility Easement ensures uninterrupted municipal access to inspect, maintain, repair, and replace essential sewer facilities without reliance on future property owner consent.
It also preserves the City’s legal rights in the event of property transfer, redevelopment, or refinancing, thereby avoiding future access disputes. Recording the easements provides clear notice to current and future property owners that public utility facilities are present and that the City retains ongoing rights and obligations related to those facilities.
Upon adoption of the Resolutions, the City Manager will execute the Certificates of Acceptance pursuant to Government Code Section 27281. The fully executed Easement Deeds will then be recorded in the Official Records of San Joaquin County.
Environmental Review:
Acceptance and recordation of the easement deeds constitutes a ministerial action implementing previously approved discretionary land use entitlements. As such, the action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15268 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with acceptance or recordation of the Easement Deeds.
The easements formalize the City’s rights related to existing public sewer infrastructure. Routine maintenance and repair of the sewer facilities will continue to be funded through existing utility operations and programmed through the City’s Capital Improvement Program as necessary.
Attachments
1. Resolution Accepting Easement Deed for APN 227-180-350-000
2. Resolution Accepting Easement Deed for APN 227-180-420-000
3. Easement Deed with Exhibits A and B – APN 227-180-350-000
4. Easement Deed with Exhibits A and B – APN 227-180-420-000
ATTACHMENT 1
.
RESOLUTION NO. XX-26
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
OVER A PORTION OF APN 227-180-350-000 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
AND CONSENTING TO RECORDATION BY THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2023, the City Council approved Application No. 23-785, a Planned Development Rezone, Site and Architectural Review, and environmental determination for the construction of a 1,250 square foot office building and a 4,750 square foot storage building and property use as a contractor’s storage yard; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval for that project, the applicant was required to grant a fifteen foot Public Utility Easement over the abandoned alley area extending from Second Street to Brayton Avenue, located east of Jackson Avenue for the existing public sewer line; and WHEREAS, RossMichael LP, a California Limited Partnership, is the owner of real property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 227-180-350-000; and WHEREAS, RossMichael LP has executed an Easement Deed granting to the City of Escalon a perpetual easement for public utility purposes, including installation, construction, access, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of public utility facilities, as more particularly described in the Easement Deed and attached Exhibits A and B; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that acceptance of the Easement Deed is in the public interest and necessary to formalize the City’s rights for maintenance and operation of the existing public sewer infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that acceptance of the Easement Deed is consistent with the Conditions of Approval for Application No. 23-785 and is necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, acceptance of the Easement Deed constitutes a ministerial action and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15268 of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Escalon as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Easement Deed from RossMichael LP for public utility purposes over a portion of APN 227-180-350-000.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 27281, the City Manager is authorized to execute the Certificate of Acceptance on behalf of the City of Escalon.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause the executed Easement Deed to be recorded in the Official Records of San Joaquin County.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.
ATTACHMENT 1
.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 2nd Day of March, 2026 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
ANDREW HAGAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
MICHELE BATES, Deputy City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 2
.
RESOLUTION NO. XX-26
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON
ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
OVER A PORTION OF APN 227-180-420-000 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
AND CONSENTING TO RECORDATION BY THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2023, the City Council approved Application No. 23-785, a Planned Development Rezone, Site and Architectural Review, and environmental determination for the construction of a 1,250 square foot office building and a 4,750 square foot storage building and property use as a contractor’s storage yard; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval for that project, the applicant was required to grant a fifteen foot Public Utility Easement over the abandoned alley area extending from Second Street to Brayton Avenue, located east of Jackson Avenue for the existing public sewer line; and WHEREAS, RossMichael LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, is the owner of real property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 227-180-420-000; and WHEREAS, RossMichael LLC has executed an Easement Deed granting to the City of Escalon a perpetual easement for public utility purposes, including installation, construction, access, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of public utility facilities, as more particularly described in the Easement Deed and attached Exhibits A and B; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that acceptance of the Easement Deed is in the public interest and necessary to formalize the City’s rights for maintenance and operation of the existing public sewer infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that acceptance of the Easement Deed is consistent with the Conditions of Approval for Application No. 23-785 and is necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, acceptance of the Easement Deed constitutes a ministerial action and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15268 of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Escalon as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Easement Deed from RossMichael LLC for public utility purposes over a portion of APN 227-180-420-000.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 27281, the City Manager is authorized to execute the Certificate of Acceptance on behalf of the City of Escalon.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause the executed Easement Deed to be recorded in the Official Records of San Joaquin County.
ATTACHMENT 2
.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 2nd Day of March, 2026 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
ANDREW HAGAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
MICHELE BATES, Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Pursuant to Section 27281 of the
California Government Code
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Easement Deed dated __________________, 20___, from ROSSMICHAEL LP, a California Limited Liability Corporation, as Grantor thereunder, to the CITY OF ESCALON, a municipal corporation of the State of California, as Grantee thereunder, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the CITY OF ESCALON pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. ________, adopted by the City Council of the City of Escalon on _____________, 20__, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: ____________________, 20___ CITY OF ESCALON
By ____________________________
Jaylen French
City Manager
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM NO. 8
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Diana Trejo, Associate Planner
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Consider Final Acceptance of the Roosevelt Water Valve Replacement Project and Authorize the Deputy City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion Recommendation:
Accept the Roosevelt Water Valve Replacement Project in the amount of $30,140 and authorize the Deputy City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This project is consistent with the City of Escalon Strategic Plan Priority #4, Infrastructure, by maintaining and improving critical water distribution system components that provide reliable service to the community.
Background and Discussion:
On February 2, 2026, Council awarded the Roosevelt Water Valve Replacement Project to Rolfe Construction, Inc., of Atwater California, in the amount of $30,140 and granted change order authorization to the City Manager in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for a total authorization of $35,140.
Construction proceeded on February 9, 2026, and work concluded on February 12, 2026. The project involved removing and replacing a broken valve in the City’s water system. This valve controls the flow of water from the City well to nearby neighborhoods. When a valve fails, it limits the City’s ability to control water flow in that area.
With the new valve installed, City staff can now turn water on or off to a specific section of the system if there is a leak or water main break. This means that during repairs, only the homes directly affected need to have their water temporarily shut off, rather than a larger portion of the community. The replacement improves the reliability of the water system and helps reduce service disruptions for residents.
No change orders were issued for this project. The final construction cost is $30,140, which is equal to the original base contract amount and within the total authorized budget. Staff have inspected the improvements and determined that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Upon acceptance by the City Council, the Notice of Completion will be filed with the County Recorder.
Final payment, including release of any funds retained, will be processed in accordance with applicable statutory requirements.
Fiscal Impact:
The project was included in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Adopted Budget and is funded through the Water Depreciation Reserve Fund, Fund 610. Sufficient appropriations were budgeted and are available to fully fund the project. The final construction cost of $30,140 is within the approved budget and contract authorization.
Funding Source Contract
Amount Notes (Explanation of Funding Source)
Water Depreciation
Reserve Fund
610
$30,140.00 A fund used to account for the gradual deterioration and eventual replacement of water system assets.
Attachments:
1. Notice of Completion
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF ESCALON
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
CITY OF ESCALON
2060 MCHENRY AVENUE
ESCALON, CA 95320
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
THE CITY OF ESCALON, OWNER of that certain real property hereinafter described, did, on the 3rd Day of February, 2026 entered into a contract with Rolfe Construction Inc., of Atwater, California, CONTRACTOR, for work of consisting of the construction of the Roosevelt Water Valve Replacement Project.
The name and address of the surety of the Contractor is: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. One Town Square, Hartford, CT 06183 – Bond No. 108294175.
The name and address of Owner for which said work was performed is: City of Escalon, 2060 McHenry Avenue, Escalon, California 95320.
The real property on which said work was performed is situated in the County of San Joaquin, State of California, in the City of Escalon.
On the 2nd day of March, 2026 said Contract, as a whole, was completed and the work accepted by the Owner.
By: __________________________
Jaylen French, City Manager
City of Escalon, California
I, Jaylen French, City Manager of the City of Escalon, California declare that I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, and that the facts stated therein are true and declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at Escalon, County of San Joaquin, State of California, on March 3, 2026. ___________________________
Jaylen French, City Manager
City of Escalon, California
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 64 of 95
ITEM NO. __9__
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Trevin W. Barber, Development and Community Services Manager Date: February 20, 2026
Subject: Introduce and Waive the First Reading of Ordinance No. XXX Amending Section
17.41.140 of the Escalon Municipal Code Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units to Comply with Recent Changes in State Law, and Finding the Action to be Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21080.17
Recommendation:
1. Introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. XXX amending Section 17.41.140 of the Escalon Municipal Code relating to Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units to comply with recent changes in State law.
2. Find the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This item is not directly applicable to a Strategic Priority of the adopted Escalon 2025-2026 Strategic Plan.
Background and Discussion:
In recent years, the California legislature has enacted, and the Governor has signed into law, a number of bills that reduce local authority in regulating residential development, particularly accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs). In late 2025, four (4) new bills were enacted that further amend state ADU law as summarized below.
Without an adopted local ordinance, the City is required to approve ADUs based solely on State default standards, eliminating all local development controls and exposing the City to inconsistent and unsafe development. Without a local ordinance, the City is unable to enforce local development standards related to height limits, setbacks, architectural review, privacy and window placement, landscaping and screening, utility connection standards, and parking requirements.
For this reason, an urgency ordinance was brought before the City Council at the January 20, 2026 meeting. The urgency ordinance took effect immediately upon adoption and restored a valid and enforceable local ADU regulatory framework that complies with current state law. Under normal
circumstances, an ordinance affecting planning and zoning would require public hearings and a planning commission recommendation, introduction at a first reading, adoption at a second reading, and would take effect 30 days after adoption. However, that process could not be completed prior to January 1, 2026, and the City was currently operating without a valid ADU ordinance. Following the adoption of the urgency ordinances, it is best practice to subsequently follow the typical public hearing processes. This item initiates that process.
On February 10, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed ordinance and thereafter approved recommending adoption of the ordinance to the City Council (Attachment 1). The Commission directed Staff to review trash service requirements for ADUs. Staff confirmed that Section 8.08 of the Municipal Code already requires each dwelling unit to maintain separate trash and organic recycling carts. No additional amendment is necessary. Staff recommends that the City Council proceed in accordance with the recommended actions set forth above.
Assembly Bill 462
AB 462 primarily modifies permitting requirements associated with processing Coastal Development Permits (CDP) for ADUs located in the Coastal Zone.
However, beyond changes to the CDP processing, AB 462 modifies the rules governing the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CofO) for an ADU. Historically, state law has prohibited a local agency from issuing a CofO for an ADU before one is issued for the primary dwelling (i.e., the primary dwelling must have a CofO before the ADU can receive one). AB 462 creates a narrow exception to this prohibition for detached ADUs when all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) the Governor has declared a state of emergency for the county on or after February 1, 2025; (2) the primary dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed by an event referenced in the state of emergency proclamation; and
(3) the ADU has been issued construction permits and passed all required inspections. (Gov. Code, § 66328(b).) If these conditions are satisfied, the detached ADU can receive a CofO before the primary dwelling. In all other scenarios, the primary dwelling still needs a CofO before one can be issued for an ADU.
AB 462 took effect immediately when signed by the Governor on October 10, 2025.
The following three bills were enacted as non-urgency measures and took effect on January 1, 2026.
Assembly Bill 1154 – JADU Owner-Occupancy; Short-Term Rental When a JADU is developed, existing state law requires a property owner to reside in the JADU or remaining portion of the single-family dwelling. AB 1154 narrows this requirement to now only apply when a JADU shares sanitation facilities (bathroom) with the single-family dwelling. If the JADU has its own bathroom, then the property owner does not have to reside on the property at all. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(b).)
AB 1154 also expressly prohibits JADUs from being used as short-term rentals (i.e., rented for a term shorter than 30 days). (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(g).) Most ADU ordinances already included this prohibition (as well as prohibiting ADUs from being used as short-term rentals). But now it’s required by state law.
Senate Bill 9; Senate Bill 543 – ADU Ordinance Submittal to HCD; Approval Under existing law, local agencies are required to submit a copy of their ADU ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 60 days of adoption.
This year’s SB 91 and SB 543 create a penalty for failing to do so by rendering null and void any local ordinance that is not submitted to HCD within 60 days of adoption. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66326(d); new Gov. Code, § 66333.5(d).) The bills further specify that a local ADU ordinance is null and void if HCD issues findings that the ordinance does not comply with state law and the local agency fails to respond to HCD within 30 days. (Id.)
Senate Bill 543 – ADU Size; Number of ADUs; Impact Fees; Permitting Timeline SB 543 makes numerous changes and clarifications to state ADU law, the most notable of which are summarized below.
ADU & JADU Size
Existing law limits the maximum size of a JADU to 500 square feet and prohibits local ADU ordinances from imposing certain development standards that would prevent an ADU created under Government Code section 66314 through 66322 from being at least 800 square feet.
SB 543 amends state ADU law to specify that allowable square footage of an ADU or JADU refers to square footage of “interior livable space.” (See amended Gov. Code, § 66313(d), 66321(b)(2).) Impact Fees
Existing law exempts ADUS that are 750 square feet or smaller from development impacts fees (DIFs).
SB 543 clarifies that DIFs may not be imposed on an ADU that has 750 or fewer square feet of interior livable space or on a JADU with 500 or fewer square feet of interior livable space.
The bill also exempts an ADU or JADU with fewer than 500 square feet of interior livable space from school impact fees. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66311.5.) Quantity of ADUs Created Under Government Code Section 66323 Existing state law creates four categories of ADUs that must be approved if they comply with the limited standards provided in Government Code section 66323(a)(1)–(4). These are:
1 Not to be confused with the SB 9 of 2021 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 162) regarding urban lot splits and second primary dwelling units.
(1) a converted ADU and JADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(1));
(2) a detached ADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling (Gov.
Code, § 66323(a)(2));
(3) converted ADUs created in an existing multifamily dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(3)); and
(4) detached ADUs created on a lot with a proposed or existing multifamily dwelling.
For some time, there has been uncertainty as to whether ADUs created under Government Code section 66323 could be combined. Some practitioners interpreted the statute to not require local agencies to allow combinations. Initially, HCD took the same position in its 2020 ADU Handbook.
But for the last few years, HCD has taken the opposite position: yes, combinations are permitted. (See HCD January 2025 ADU Handbook, at p. 19 [“[P]ursuant to Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a), local governments must allow units created pursuant to subparagraphs (1) and (2) together or (3) and (4) together”].)
SB 543 codifies HCD’s most recent interpretation by amending Government Code section 66323 to specifically allow combinations. Thus, a lot with a multifamily dwelling can now have a converted ADU or ADUs created under section 66323(a)(3) and detached ADUs created under section 66323(a)(4). And a lot with a single-family dwelling can now have a converted ADU and a JADU created under section 66323(a)(1) and a detached ADU created under section 66323(a)(2).
ADU Permitting Process
Existing law has long required local agencies to approve or deny an ADU application within 60 days of receiving a complete application. However, state law was silent with respect to incompleteness determinations, subsequent resubmittals, and appealing local decisions on ADU applications.
SB 543 requires local agencies to now:
(1) determine whether an ADU application is complete within 15 business days of submittal; (2) if the application is incomplete, within the same 15 days provide the applicant with a list of incomplete items and how to address them;
(3) review a resubmitted application for completeness within 15 business days; (4) provide the applicant with a written appeal process for any incompleteness determination or denial (to the Planning Commission or City Council, or both); and (5) provide a final written determination on the appeal within 60 business days of receiving the appeal). (See amended Gov. Code, §§ 66317 [ADUs], 66335 [JADUs].) AB 462 took effect immediately upon being signed into law and did not require amendments to the City’s local ordinance. Instead, the City was required to comply with the new statutory requirements related to Coastal Development Permit processing and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, where applicable.
The remaining state ADU bills took effect on January 1, 2026. As of that date, the City’s existing ADU ordinance no longer complied with state law and was therefore null and void as a matter of law until a compliant ordinance was adopted. In the absence of a valid local ordinance, the City was required to approve Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units based solely on default state standards, with no local regulations governing height, setbacks, landscaping, architectural review, or other development criteria.
Approval of ADUs and JADUs under these default statutory standards, without locally adopted regulations, would pose a risk to the character of existing neighborhoods and could negatively impact property values, personal privacy, and fire safety.
Environmental Review:
Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code, which is California’s ADU law. Therefore, the adoption of the proposed urgency Ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA in that it implements state ADU law.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct impact to the City’s general fund from amending the municipal code to relating to ADUs. Over the last several years, State law has reduced the fees that are able to be charged for new residential developments, particularly for ADUs, which could put more of the burden of development on the city as opposed to the developer owner/tenant.
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Resolution
2. Ordinance No. XXX, amending Section 17.41.140 of the Escalon Municipal Code relating to Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units to comply with recent changes in State law
3. Model Code Amendments
93939.00066\44316944.2
-1-
CITY OF ESCALON
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ESCALON, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17.41.140 OF THE ESCALON
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND
JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, AND FINDING THE ACTION TO
BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER PUBLIC RESOURCES
CODE § 21080.17
WHEREAS, state law authorizes cities to act by ordinance to provide for the creation and regulation of accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”) and junior accessory dwelling units (“JADUs”); and
WHEREAS, in recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, a number of bills that, among other things, amend various sections of the Government Code to impose new limits on local authority to regulate ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, in 2025, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, further amendments to state ADU law;
WHEREAS, new updates to state ADU law take effect on January 1, 2026, and for the City’s ADU ordinance to remain valid, it must be amended to reflect the most recent changes to state law; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend its local regulatory scheme for the construction of ADUs and JADUs to reflect the most recent changes to state law; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the attached Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ESCALON DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Incorporation. The recitals above are true and correct and are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the Planning Commission.
93939.00066\44316944.2
- 3 -
Exhibit “A”
Proposed Ordinance
[Attached]
93939.00066\44316644.3
- 1 -
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCALON AMENDING SECTION 17.41.140 OF THE CITY OF ESCALON MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO COMPLY WITH THE RECENT
CHANGES IN STATE LAW, AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE
STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE § 21080.17
WHEREAS, the City of Escalon, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, state law authorizes cities to act by ordinance to provide for the creation and regulation of accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”) and junior accessory dwelling units (“JADUs”); and
WHEREAS, in recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, numerous bills that, among other things, amend various sections of the Government Code to impose new limits on local authority to regulate ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, in 2025, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, further amendments to state ADU law; and
WHEREAS, new updates to state ADU law take effect on January 1, 2026, and for the City’s ADU ordinance to remain valid, it must be amended to reflect the most recent changes to state law; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend its local regulatory scheme for the construction of ADUs and JADUs to reflect the most recent changes to state law; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning this proposed Ordinance. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward the Ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2026, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, including: (1) the public testimony and agenda reports prepared in connection with the Ordinance, (2) the policy considerations discussed therein, and (3) the consideration and recommendation by the City’s Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Escalon does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Incorporation. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.
93939.00066\44316644.3
- 2 -
SECTION 2. CEQA. Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.17, the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code, which is California’s ADU law. Therefore, adoption of the Ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA in that it implements state ADU law.
SECTION 3. General Plan. The City Council hereby finds that the adoption of the Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan as a matter of law under Government Code section 66314(c).
SECTION 4. Code Amendment. Section 17.41.140 of the Escalon Municipal Code is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as provided in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days after its adoption.
SECTION 6. HCD Submittal. In accordance with Government Code sections 66326 and 66333.5, the City Clerk is directed to submit a copy of this Ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption.
SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and post or publish this Ordinance as required by law.
SECTION 8. Custodian of Records. The custodian of records for this Ordinance is the City Clerk and the records comprising the administrative record are located at 2060 McHenry Avenue, Escalon, CA 95320.
SECTION 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.
(Continues on next page)
93939.00066\44316644.3
- 3 -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Escalon, California, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___ day of _________, 202_ by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: __________________________
ANDREW HAGAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
MICHELE BATES, Deputy City Clerk
93939.00066\44316644.3
- 4 -
EXHIBIT A
Amended ADU Regulations
(follows this page)
93939.00066\43259374.8
1 Section 17.41.140 Accessory Dwelling Units
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow and regulate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in compliance with Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code. (b) Effect of Conforming. An ADU or JADU that conforms to the standards in this section will not be:
(1) Deemed to be inconsistent with the city’s general plan and zoning designation for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located.
(2) Deemed to exceed the allowable density for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located.
(3) Considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth.
(4) Required to correct a nonconforming zoning condition, as defined in subsection (c)(8) below. This does not prevent the city from enforcing compliance with applicable building standards in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 17980.12.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, terms are defined as follows:
(1) “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
(A) An efficiency unit, as defined by section 17958.1 of the California Health and Safety Code; and
(B) A manufactured home, as defined by section 18007 of the California Health and Safety Code.
(2) “Accessory structure” means a structure that is accessory and incidental to a dwelling located on the same lot.
(3) “Complete independent living facilities” means permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated.
(4) “Efficiency kitchen” means a kitchen that includes all of the following:
(A) A cooking facility with appliances.
93939.00066\43259374.8
2 (B) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of a reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU.
(5) “Junior accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a residential unit that satisfies all of the following:
(A) It is no more than 500 square feet of interior livable space in size. (B) It is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure. An enclosed use within the residence, such as an attached garage, is considered to be a part of and contained within the single-family structure. (C) It includes its own separate sanitation facilities or shares sanitation facilities with the existing or proposed single-family structure.
(D) If the unit does not include its own separate bathroom, then it contains an interior entrance to the main living area of the existing or proposed singlefamily structure in addition to an exterior entrance that is separate from the main entrance to the primary dwelling.
(E) It includes an efficiency kitchen, as defined in subsection (c)(4) above. (6) “Livable space” means a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation. (7) “Living area” means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure. (8) “Nonconforming zoning condition” means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform with current zoning standards.
(9) “Passageway” means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance of the ADU or JADU.
(10) “Proposed dwelling” means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.
(11) “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public.
(12) “Tandem parking” means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another. (d) Approvals. The following approvals apply to ADUs and JADUs created under this section:
93939.00066\43259374.8
3 (1) Ministerial ADU and Building Permits Required. Every ADU and JADU requires an ADU permit and a building permit. The city will review and approve permit applications in accordance with subsection (d)(3) below. (2) Processing Fee. The city may charge a fee to reimburse it for costs incurred in processing ADU permits, including the costs of adopting or amending the city’s ADU ordinance. The ADU-permit processing fee is determined by the Development and Community Services Manager and approved by the city council by resolution.
(3) Process and Timing.
(A) Completeness.
(i) Determination in 15 days. The city will determine whether an application to create or serve an ADU or JADU is complete and will provide written notice of the determination to the applicant within 15 business days after the city receives the application submittal. (ii) Incomplete items. If the city’s determination under subsection (d)(3)(A)(i) above is that the application is incomplete, the city’s notice must list the incomplete items and describe how the application can be made complete.
(iii) Cure. After receiving a notice that the application is incomplete, the applicant may cure and address the items that were deemed by the city to be incomplete.
(iv) Subsequent submittals. If the applicant submits additional information to address incomplete items, within 15 business days of the subsequent submittal the city will determine in writing whether the additional information remedies all the incomplete items that the city identified in its original notice. The city may not require the application to include an item that was not included in the original notice.
(v) Deemed complete. If the city does not make a timely determination as required by this subsection (A), the application or resubmitted application is deemed complete for the purposes of subsection (d)(3)(C) below.
(vi) Appeal of incompleteness. An applicant may appeal the city’s determination that the application is incomplete by submitting a written appeal to the city clerk. The planning commission will review the written appeal and affirm or reverse the completeness determination and provide a final written determination to the applicant within 60 business days after receipt of the appeal.
93939.00066\43259374.8
4 (B) No discretion or hearing. Ministerial permits for an ADU or JADU are considered and approved without discretionary review or a hearing. (C) Deadline to approve or deny ministerial approvals. The city must approve or deny an application to create an ADU or JADU within 60 days from the date that the city receives a complete application. If the city has not approved or denied the complete application within 60 days, the application is deemed approved unless either:
(i) The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay, or
(ii) When an application to create an ADU or JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the city may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the city acts on the permit application to create the new single-family or multifamily dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. (D) Denial. If the city denies an application to create an ADU or JADU, the city must provide the applicant with comments that include, among other things, a list of all the defective or deficient items and a description of how the application may be remedied by the applicant. Notice of the denial and corresponding comments must be provided to the applicant within the 60- day time period established by subsection (d)(3)(C) above. (E) Appeal of denial. An applicant may appeal the city’s denial of the application by submitting a written appeal to the city clerk. The planning commission will review the written appeal and affirm or reverse the denial and provide a final written determination to the applicant within 60 business days after receipt of the appeal.
(F) Concurrent review of demolition. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU is reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time.
(e) Classes.
(1) Class 1: Statutorily Regulated. Class 1 ADUs and JADUs are approved under Government Code section 66323. If an ADU or JADU complies with each of the general requirements in subsection (f) below, it is allowed in each of the scenarios provided in this subsection (e)(1). An ADU and JADU approved under subsection (e)(1)(A) may be combined with an ADU approved under subsection (e)(1)(B), and ADUs approved under subsection (e)(1)(C) may be combined with ADUs approved under subsection (e)(1)(D).
93939.00066\43259374.8
5 (A) Converted on Lot with Single-Family: One ADU as described in this subsection (e)(1)(A) and one JADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling on it, where the ADU or JADU:
(i) Is either: within the space of a proposed single-family dwelling; within the existing space of an existing single-family dwelling; or (in the case of an ADU only) within the existing space of an accessory structure, plus up to 150 additional square feet if the expansion is limited to accommodating ingress and egress; and (ii) Has exterior access that is independent of that for the single-family dwelling; and
(iii) Has side and rear setbacks sufficient for fire and safety, as dictated by applicable building and fire codes.
(iv) The JADU complies with the requirements of Government Code sections 66333 through 66339.
(B) Limited Detached on Lot with Single-Family: One detached, newconstruction ADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling, if the detached ADU satisfies each of the following limitations:
(i) The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. (ii) The total floor area is 800 square feet of livable space or smaller. (iii) The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit in subsection (f)(2) below.
(C) Converted on Lot with Multifamily: One or more ADUs within portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including but not limited to storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each converted ADU complies with state building standards for dwellings. Under this subsection (e)(1)(C), at least one converted ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling, up to a quantity equal to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units.
(D) Limited Detached on Lot with Multifamily: No more than two detached ADUs on a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, or up to eight detached ADUs on a lot with an existing multifamily dwelling, if each detached ADU satisfies all of the following:
(i) The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet, the city will not require any modification to the multifamily dwelling as a condition of approving the ADU.
93939.00066\43259374.8
6 (ii) The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit provided in subsection (f)(2) below.
(iii) If the lot has an existing multifamily dwelling, the quantity of detached ADUs does not exceed the number of primary dwelling units on the lot.
(2) Class 2: Locally Regulated. Class 2 ADUs are approved under Government Code sections 66314–66322. Except for Class 1 ADUs approved under subsection (e)(1) above, all ADUs are subject to the standards set forth in subsections (f) and (g) below.
(f) General Requirements. The following requirements apply to all Class 1 and Class 2 ADUs and JADUs:
(1) Zoning.
(A) A Class 1 ADU approved under subsection (e)(1) may be created on a lot in a residential or mixed-use zone.
(B) A Class 2 ADU approved under subsection (e)(2) above may be created on a lot that is zoned to allow single-family dwelling residential use or multifamily dwelling residential use.
(C) In accordance with Government Code section 66333(a), a JADU may only be created on a lot zoned for single-family residences. (2) Height.
(A) Except as otherwise provided by subsections (f)(2)(B) and (f)(2)(C) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed 16 feet in height. (B) A detached ADU may be up to 18 feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of 20 feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. (C) A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed 18 feet in height.
(D) An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies
93939.00066\43259374.8
7 to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (f)(2)(D) may not exceed two stories. (E) For purposes of this subsection (f)(2), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure.
(3) Fire Sprinklers.
(A) Fire sprinklers are required in an ADU or JADU if sprinklers are required in the primary residence.
(B) The construction of an ADU or JADU does not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. (4) Rental Term. No ADU or JADU may be rented for a term that is shorter than 30 days. This prohibition applies regardless of when the ADU or JADU was created. (5) No Separate Conveyance. An ADU or JADU may be rented, but, except as otherwise provided in Government Code section 66341, no ADU or JADU may be sold or otherwise conveyed separately from the lot and the primary dwelling (in the case of a single-family lot) or from the lot and all of the dwellings (in the case of a multifamily lot).
(6) Septic System. If the ADU or JADU will connect to an onsite wastewater-treatment system, the owner must include with the application a percolation test completed within the last five years or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years.
(7) Owner Occupancy.
(A) ADUs. ADUs are not subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. (B) JADUs.
(i) Generally. As required by state law, JADUs are generally subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. A natural person with legal or equitable title to the property must reside on the property, in either the primary dwelling or JADU, as the person’s legal domicile and permanent residence.
(ii) Exceptions. The owner-occupancy requirement in this subsection (f)(7)(B) does not apply in either of the following situations:
(I) The JADU has separate sanitation facilities (i.e., does not share sanitation facilities with the existing primary dwelling unit structure).
93939.00066\43259374.8
8 (II) The property is entirely owned by another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.
(8) Deed Restriction. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for an JADU, a deed restriction must be recorded against the title of the property in the County Recorder’s office and a copy filed with the Development and Community Services Manager. The deed restriction must run with the land and bind all future owners.
The form of the deed restriction will be provided by the city and must provide that:
(A) The JADU may not be sold separately from the primary dwelling. (B) The JADU is restricted to the approved size and to other attributes allowed by this section.
(C) The deed restriction runs with the land and may be enforced against future property owners.
(D) The deed restriction may be removed if the owner eliminates the JADU, as evidenced by, for example, removal of the kitchen facilities. To remove the deed restriction, an owner may make a written request of the Director, providing evidence that the JADU has in fact been eliminated. The Director may then determine whether the evidence supports the claim that the JADU has been eliminated. Appeal may be taken from the Director’s determination consistent with other provisions of this Code. If the JADU is not entirely physically removed, but is only eliminated by virtue of having a necessary component of an JADU removed, the remaining structure and improvements must otherwise comply with applicable provisions of this Code.
(E) The deed restriction is enforceable by the director or his or her designee for the benefit of the city. Failure of the property owner to comply with the deed restriction may result in legal action against the property owner, and the city is authorized to obtain any remedy available to it at law or equity, including, but not limited to, obtaining an injunction enjoining the use of the JADU in violation of the recorded restrictions or abatement of the illegal unit. (9) Building & Safety.
(A) Must comply with building code. Subject to subsection (f)(9)(B) below, all ADUs and JADUs must comply with all local building code requirements.
(B) No change of occupancy. Construction of an ADU does not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the local building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code, unless the building official or Code Enforcement Division officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this
93939.00066\43259374.8
9 subsection (f)(9)(B) prevents the city from changing the occupancy code of a space that was uninhabitable space or that was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use in accordance with this section.
(10) Certificate of Occupancy Timing.
(A) Generally. No certificate of occupancy for an ADU or JADU may be issued before the certificate of occupancy is issued for the primary dwelling unit. (B) Limited Exception for State-declared Emergencies. Notwithstanding subsection (f)(10)(A) above, a certificate of occupancy for an ADU may be issued before a certificate of occupancy for the primary dwelling if each of the following requirements are met:
(i) The county is subject to a proclamation of a state of emergency made by the California Governor on or after February 1, 2025. (ii) The primary dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed by an event referenced in the Governor’s state of emergency
proclamation.
(iii) The ADU has been issued construction permits and has passed all required inspections.
(iv) The ADU is not attached to the primary dwelling.
(g) Specific ADU Requirements. The following requirements apply only to Class 2 ADUs approved under subsection (e)(2) above. This subsection (g) does not apply to Class 1 ADUs or JADUs approved under subsection (e)(1) above.
(1) Maximum Size.
(A) The maximum size of a detached or attached ADU subject to this subsection (g) is 850 square feet of interior livable space for a studio or one-bedroom unit and 1,000 square feet of interior livable space for a unit with two or more bedrooms.
(B) An attached ADU that is created on a lot with an existing primary dwelling is further limited to 50 percent of the floor area of the existing primary dwelling.
(C) Application of other development standards in this subsection (g), such as FAR or lot coverage, might further limit the size of the ADU, but no application of the percent-based size limit in subsection (g)(1)(B) above or of an FAR, front setback, lot coverage limit, or open-space requirement may require the ADU have less than 800 square feet of interior livable space.
93939.00066\43259374.8
10 (2) Floor Area Ratio (FAR). No ADU subject to this subsection (g) may cause the total FAR of the lot to exceed 65 percent, subject to subsection (g)(1)(C) above. (3) Setbacks.
(A) ADUs that are subject to this subsection (g) must conform to 4-foot side and rear setbacks. ADUs that are subject to this subsection (g) must conform to 25-foot front setbacks, subject to subsection (g)(1)(C) above. (B) No setback is required for an ADU that is subject to this subsection (g) if the ADU is constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
(4) Lot Coverage. No ADU subject to this subsection (g) may cause the total lot coverage of the lot to exceed 65 percent, subject to subsection (g)(1)(C) above. (5) Minimum Open Space. No ADU subject to this subsection (g) may cause the total percentage of open space of the lot to fall below 35 percent, subject to subsection (g)(1)(C) above.
(6) Passageway. No passageway, as defined by subsection (c)(9) above, is required for an ADU.
(7) Parking.
(A) Generally. One off-street parking space is required for each ADU or bedroom, whichever is less. The parking space may be provided in setback areas or as tandem parking, as defined by subsection (c)(12) above. (B) Exceptions. No parking under subsection (g)(7)(A) is required in the following situations:
(i) The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, as defined in subsection (c)(11) above.
(ii) The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(iii) The ADU is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure.
(iv) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU.
(v) When there is an established car share vehicle stop located within one block of the ADU.
93939.00066\43259374.8
11 (vi) When the permit application to create an ADU is submitted with an application to create a new single-family or new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the lot satisfies any other criteria listed in subsections (g)(7)(B)(i) through (v) above.
(C) No Replacement. When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced.
(8) Architectural Requirements.
(A) The materials and colors of the exterior walls, roof, and windows and doors must be the same as those of the primary dwelling.
(B) The roof slope must match that of the dominant roof slope of the primary dwelling. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
(C) The exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights or as otherwise required by the building or fire code.
(D) The ADU must have an independent exterior entrance, apart from that of the primary dwelling.
(E) The interior horizontal dimensions of an ADU must be at least 10 feet wide in every direction, with a minimum interior wall height of seven feet. (F) No window or door of the ADU may have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property. Each window and door must either be located where there is no direct line of sight or screened using fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass to prevent a direct line of sight. (G) All windows and doors in an ADU less than 30 feet from a property line that is not a public right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass. (9) Landscape Requirements. Evergreen landscape screening must be planted and maintained between the ADU and adjacent parcels as follows:
(A) At least one 15-gallon size plant must be provided for every five linear feet of exterior ADU wall. Alternatively, at least one 24” box size plant must be provided for every ten linear feet of exterior ADU wall. (B) Plant specimens must be at least six feet tall when installed. As an alternative, a solid fence of at least six feet in height may be installed.
93939.00066\43259374.8
12 (C) All landscaping must be drought-tolerant.
(D) All trees must be from the city’s approved tree list. (10) Historical Protections. An ADU that is on or within 600 feet of real property that is listed in the California Register of Historic Resources must be located so as to not be visible from any public right-of-way.
(11) Allowed Stories. No ADU subject to this subsection (g) may have more than one story, except that an ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may have the stories allowed under subparagraph (f)(2)(D) of this section. (h) Fees. The following requirements apply to all Class 1 ADUs and JADUs and Class 2 ADUs that are approved under subsections (e)(1) or (e)(2) above. (1) Impact Fees.
(A) No impact fee is required for a JADU or for an ADU that has less than 750 square feet of interior livable space. For purposes of this subsection (h)(1), “impact fee” means a “fee” under the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code § 66000(b)) and a fee under the Quimby Act (Gov. Code § 66477). “Impact fee” here does not include any connection fee or capacity charge for water or sewer service.
(B) A JADU or ADU with less than 500 square feet of interior livable space does not increase assessable space by 500 square feet for purposes of Education Code section 17620(a)(1)(C), and is therefore not subject to school fees under Education Code section 17620.
(C) Any impact fee that is required for an ADU that has 750 square feet or more of interior livable space must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. (E.g., the floor area of the ADU, divided by the floor area of the primary dwelling, times the typical fee amount charged for a new dwelling.)
(2) Utility Fees.
(A) If an ADU or JADU is constructed with a new single-family home, a separate utility connection directly between the ADU or JADU and the utility and payment of the normal connection fee and capacity charge for a new dwelling are required.
(B) Except as described in subsection (h)(2)(A), JADUs and converted ADUs on a single-family lot that are created under subsection (e)(1)(A) above are not required to have a new or separate utility connection directly between the JADU or ADU and the utility. Nor is a connection fee or capacity charge required. Notwithstanding the rest of this paragraph, a direct utility
93939.00066\43259374.8
13 connection is required for separate conveyance of an ADU when separate conveyance is allowed under this code.
(C) Except as described in subsection (h)(2)(A), all ADUs that are not covered by subsection (h)(2)(B) require a new, separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility for any utility that is provided by the city.
All utilities that are not provided by the city are subject to the connection and fee requirements of the utility provider.
(i) The connection is subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that is proportionate to the burden created by the ADU based on either the floor area or the number of drainage-fixture units (DFU) values, as defined by the Uniform Plumbing Code, upon the water or sewer system.
(ii) The portion of the fee or charge that is charged by the city may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service.
(i) Nonconforming Zoning Code Conditions, Building Code Violations, and Unpermitted Structures.
(1) Generally. The city will not deny an ADU or JADU application due to a nonconforming zoning condition, building code violation, or unpermitted structure on the lot that does not present a threat to the public health and safety and that is not affected by the construction of the ADU or JADU.
(2) Unpermitted ADUs and JADUs constructed before 2020. (A) Permit to Legalize. As required by state law, the city may not deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU or JADU that was constructed before January 1, 2020, unless denial is based on either of the following grounds:
(i) The ADU or JADU violates applicable building standards, or (ii) The ADU or JADU does not comply with state ADU or JADU law or this ADU ordinance (section 17.41.140).
(B) Exceptions:
(i) Notwithstanding subsection (i)(2)(A) above, the city may deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU or JADU that was constructed before January 1, 2020, if the city makes a finding that correcting a violation is necessary to comply with the standards specified in California Health and Safety Code section 17920.3.
93939.00066\43259374.8
14 (ii) Subsection (i)(2)(A) above does not apply to a building that is deemed to be substandard in accordance with California Health and Safety Code section 17920.3.
(j) Nonconforming ADUs and Discretionary Approval. Any proposed ADU or JADU that would otherwise be allowed under this section but that does not conform to the objective design or development standards set forth in subsections (a) through (i) of this section may be allowed by the city with a conditional use permit, in accordance with the other provisions of this title.
ITEM NO. _10__
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FOR MARCH 2, 2026
Prepared By: Trevin W. Barber, Development and Community Services Manager Date: February 23, 2026
Subject: Update on Staff Cost to Process Fireworks Booth Applications Recommendation:
Receive update on staff cost to process Fireworks Booth Applications, and related Licenses, and Deposit Fees.
Strategic Plan Priority:
This item is not directly applicable to a Strategic Priority of the adopted Escalon 2025-2026 Strategic Plan.
Background
On February 17, 2026, the Council directed staff to review the staff time required to process a fireworks booth application to verify that the fee is not above the cost of service.
The City of Escalon administers an annual Fireworks Booth Program (Program) under Escalon Municipal Code Chapter 5.28. The Program authorizes temporary retail licenses for eligible local nonprofit organizations to operate fireworks booths during the approved sales period, and establishes application, insurance, inspection, and lottery procedures to manage demand and public safety.
In 2012, the City amended the fireworks ordinance to formalize the spring application timeline and the lottery/refund process. Since that amendment, the application window has run March 1 through March 31 each year, with a public lottery conducted shortly after the window closes if applications exceed available booths. Organizations not selected in the lottery receive a refund of their application fee; organizations selected must submit a license fee, provide required insurance, post a refundable compliance deposit, and pass required fire and building inspections before receiving final authorization to operate.
Although the City has long collected an application fee, a license fee, and a refundable compliance deposit as part of the application packet, those fee amounts were not previously included in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Incorporating the Fireworks Booth fees into the Master Fee Schedule is beneficial for improving transparency, ensuring consistency with state fee-setting requirements, and allowing the fees to be updated through the City’s standard annual fee adjustment process. California Government Code Sections 65104, 65909.5, and 66014 authorize cities to establish and adjust fees to recover the reasonable cost of providing services and administering regulatory programs so as not to be subsidized by the General Fund or other unrelated revenue sources.
The Escalon City Council desired to validate the program’s underlying cost basis, and directed staff to return with a cost-of-service analysis. This item responds to that direction.
Discussion:
This section summarizes the cost-of-service analysis, and explains how costs were assigned and allocated. Most of Escalon’s fees for services rely on the following cost pools:
Direct Labor (staff time directly performing program tasks). This is the largest component of the Fireworks Stand Program (Program)
Direct Materials (supplies, forms, printing, and minor consumables). For the Program there are no longer any direct materials, or the materials usage is so small it is inefficient or impractical to calculate. Applications are now digitalized with the IT infrastructure costs included as part of overhead allocation. Any materials like note pads or pens that may be used for operating this program will be assumed as part of the indirect cost pool. Indirect Costs (applied overhead includes HR, IT, Finance, City Manager’s Office, fleet, facilities, utilities) using a predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The current fee structure for the Program does not include indirect costs. The Program fees were not included in the last comprehensive fee update—as such the City does not have a robust methodology to apply indirect costs and has not charged them to the Program cost center.
This approach aligns with Government Code §66014 and Proposition 26, which require that fees not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service. Since Direct Labor is the only cost driver of the Program, understanding the constituent components is important. The following table summarizes the task-level cost structure, including staff assignment, estimated hours, and fully burdened rates.
Table 1. Fireworks Program Task Inventory (Direct Labor) Task Staff Hours Direct
Rate
Direct
Labor Cost
Application Intake & Distribution Office Assistant 5 $ 46 $ 231 Reconciling GL Finance Director .25 $ 120 $ 30
Marketing & Public
Communications Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Pre-Lottery Completeness Review Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92 Lottery Administration Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Customer Service & Applicant
Support Office Assistant 4 $ 46 $ 185
Refund Processing & Records
Retention Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Police Chief Review of
Applications Police Chief 0.5 $118 $ 59
Public Works Setup &
Monitoring, Traffic Control
Public Works
Manager 4 $ 93 $ 558
Program Management &
Oversight
Community Services
Manager 2 $ 92 $ 185
Sales Tax Permit Coordination Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92 Insurance Certificate Verification Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92 Signage Review & Enforcement Office Assistant 1 $ 46 $ 46 Volunteer Safety Coordination Office Assistant 1 $ 46 $ 46 Cash Handling Oversight Accountant 1 $ 53 $ 53
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR — 33.75 — $1,901
Unit cost results
The total cost of services (in this case, direct labor only) of $1,901 would be divided amongst the applicants. Up to four organizations are drawn in the lottery each year, with any other applicants being refunded.
Program cost per applicant (4 applicants)
$1,901
4 ≈ $475.22
These figures represent the full cost of services performed (in this case direct labor). If the city applied indirect costs such as insurance, workers compensation, building loans, etc., the Program costs would about double.
Fee design implications
The Fireworks Stand Program includes three fee components:
1. Application Fee – Currently $137 this is submitted by all applicants during the March 1–31 application window; and refunded to those that are not selected for a booth. Covers a portion of direct labor related to intake, communications, and lottery processing.
Refundable under EMC 5.28, so it cannot be treated as cost of services recovered in the long run.
2. License Fee – paid only by organizations selected through the lottery. Primary recovery mechanism for the cost of services performed for the Program. The current license fee is $150. Combined with the application fee, the total cost for those drawn in the lotter is $287.
With four licenses, the full cost per licensee is approximately $475.22 leaving an unrecovered cost of $188.22 or a 40% subsidy.
3. Refundable Compliance Deposit – returned after the booth passes all inspections and meets cleanup and operational requirements. This is not part of cost of services. If forfeited for any reason, then it would be applied against the liability incurred.
Fiscal Impact:
Not applicable at this time. Should the City Council provide direction that requires further action, a new item will be brought before the Council and the fiscal impact will be evaluated at that time.
Attachments:
1. Detailed summary of line-item costs associated with processing a Fireworks Booth Application
Task Description Staff Hours Direct
Rate
Direct
Labor
Cost
Application Intake & Distribution Receiving applications and downloading them into .pdf, logging them in excel, confirming receipts in GL, and distributing instruction packets for full applications. Ensures each applicant enters the process uniformly.
Office Assistant 5 $ 46 $ 231
Application Reconciling GL Confirming receipts in GL, enabling payment gateway, troubleshooting error codes, processing refunds.
Finance Director 0.25 $ 120 $ 30
Marketing & Public Communications Preparing and posting public notices, updating the City website, and responding to general inquiries during the application window.
Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Pre‑Lottery Completeness Review Reviewing each application for required documents, signatures, insurance placeholders, and eligibility criteria before the lottery.
Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92
Lottery Administration Preparing lottery materials, hosting the public drawing, documenting results, and notifying applicants.
Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Customer Service & Applicant Support Responding to applicant questions, clarifying requirements, and providing guidance throughout the process.
Office Assistant 4 $ 46 $ 185
Refund Processing & Records Retention Processing refunds for unsuccessful applicants, reconciling payments, and archiving required records.
Office Assistant 3 $ 46 $ 139
Police Chief Review of Applications Reviewing each application for compliance with public safety requirements and confirming organizational eligibility.
Police Chief 0.5 $ 118 $ 59
Public Works Setup & Monitoring, Traffic Control Blocking off parking stalls, placing safety barricades, coordinating delivery of stands, and monitoring drop‑off logistics.
Public Works
Manager
4 $ 93 $ 372
Program Management & Oversight Supervising the program, coordinating interdepartmental tasks, ensuring ordinance compliance, and resolving issues.
Community
Services Manager
2 $ 92 $ 185
Sales Tax Permit Coordination Verifying seller’s permit status, confirming CDTFA compliance, and coordinating corrections with applicants.
Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92
Insurance Certificate Verification Reviewing COIs for required endorsements, coverage limits, and additional insured language; coordinating corrections.
Office Assistant 2 $ 46 $ 92
Signage Review & Enforcement Reviewing stand signage for compliance with EMC rules and ensuring safety notices are properly displayed.
Office Assistant 1 $ 46 $ 46
Volunteer Safety Coordination Providing safety guidance to each licensee, distributing City safety materials, and confirming volunteer training documentation.
Office Assistant 1 $ 46 $ 46
Cash Handling Oversight Reviewing deposit payments, reconciling receipts, and ensuring proper financial controls for refunds and deposits.
Accountant 1 $ 53 $ 53
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR — — 33.75 — $1,901