Escalon City Council
August 10, 2026

APPENDIX I
EDR Building Permit Report

Murphy Ranch
Brennan Road & Yosemite Avenue
Escalon, CA 95320
Inquiry Number: 7361112.13
June 13, 2023
EDR Building Permit Report
Target Property and Adjoining Properties
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

EDR Building Permit Report: Search Documentation 6/13/23 Site Name: Client Name:

Murphy Ranch Baez Geotechnical Group
Brennan Road & P.O. Box 296
Escalon, CA 95320 Oakdale, CA 95361
EDR Inquiry # 7361112.13 Contact: Stefanie Parman
Search Documentation

DATA GAP
The complete collection of Building Permit data available to EDR has been searched, and as of 6/13/23, EDR does not have access to building permits in the city where your target property is located (Escalon, CA).

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED ORIMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THEMAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALLRISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING

OUT OFERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLYLIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risklevels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providingany facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by anenvironmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to beconstrued as legal advice.

Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
7361112- 13 page 2

EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT
About This Report
The EDRBuilding Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

Building permit data can be used to identify current and/or former operations and structures/features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks.

ASTM and EPA Requirements
ASTM E 1527-13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7:
“Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property.” ASTM also states that “Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself.”
EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: "§312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records.”
Methodology
EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation’s largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States.

The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description.

Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control “touch points.”
For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352-0050.
.......... '

PROPERTY HISTORY
I

APPENDIX J
EDR Vapor Encroachment Screen

neercS tnemhcaorcnE ropaV RDE
teehskroW tnemhcaorcnE ropaV s’RDE gnisu deraperP
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Murphy Ranch
Brennan Road & Yosemite Avenue
Escalon, CA 95320
Inquiry Number: 7361112.5s
August 18, 2023
~EDR® Environmental Data Resources Inc

Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Primary Map 2
Secondary Map 3
Map Findings 4
Record Sources and Currency GR-1
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
The EDR Vapor Encroachment Worksheet enables EDR's customers to make certain online modifications that effects maps, text and calculations contained in this Report. As a result, maps, text and calculations contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. Environmental Data Resources shall not be responsible for any customer's decision to include or not include in any final report any records determined to be within the relevant minimum search distances.

This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH

WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY

OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.

Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TC Page 1
I

A search of available environmental records was conducted by EDR. The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E 2600).

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Default Area of Concern (Miles)* property
1/10
> 1/10
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites 1.0 0 0 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites 1.0 0 0 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders

0.5 0 0 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP 0.5 0 0 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action 1.0 0 0 0 Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities 0.5 0 0 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators 0.25 0 0 0
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0.5 0 0 0 Federal ERNS list 0.001 0 0 -
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites 1.0 0 0 0 Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities 1.0 0 0 0 Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities 0.5 0 0 0 Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks 0.5 0 0 0 Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks 0.25 0 0 0 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries not searched - - - Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.5 0 0 0 Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites 0.5 0 0 0

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists 0.5 0 0 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0.5 0 0 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 1.0 0 0 0 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0.25 0 0 0
Local Land Records 0.5 0 0 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports 0.5 0 0 0
Other Ascertainable Records 1.0 0 0 0

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 -

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
I

*The Default Area of Concern may be adjusted by the environmental professional using experience and professional judgement. Each category may include several databases, and each database may have a different distance. A list of individual databases is provided at the back of this report.

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 -

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
I

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

MURPHY RANCH

BRENNAN ROAD & YOSEMITE AVENUE
ESCALON, CA 95320

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 37.79769 - 37° 47′ 51.688843″
Longitude (West): 121.011577 - 121° 0′ 41.66565″
Elevation: 112 ft. above sea level

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
I

SEARCH RESULTS
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page
Not Reported
Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page
Not Reported
Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page
Not Reported
Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page
Not Reported

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
I

.

BeginOC−start−Wetlands−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−− State Wetlands−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− State Wetlands BeginOC−start−− National Wetlands Inventory−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− National Wetlands Inventory BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Wetlands BeginOC−start−Water−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Water BeginOC−start−Areas of Concern−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Areas of Concern BeginOC−start−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines BeginOC−start−Flood Zones−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−− 500 Year Zone−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 500 Year Zone BeginOC−start−− 100 Year Zone−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 100 Year Zone BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Flood Zones BeginOC−start−Streets−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Streets BeginOC−start−Railroads−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Railroads BeginOC−start−Target Property Location−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Target Property Location BeginOC−start−Federal DOD Records−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Federal DOD Records BeginOC−start−Indian Reservations BIA−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Indian Reservations BIA BeginOC−start−National Priority List Records−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−National Priority List Records BeginOC−start−Search Rings−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Search Rings PRIMARY MAP - 7361112.5S
N Target Property
... Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
.1 Manufactured Gas Plants
[] National Priority List Sites
c:::::J Dept. Defense Sites
SITE NAME: Murphy Ranch
::D
C.

ADDRESS: Brennan Road & Yosemite Avenue
Escalon CA 95320
LAT/LONG: 37.79769 / 121.011577
* Fa inelli P9<wy
.. '
Noni- ve ~
1 s t St
Sultana Way
1 s t St
-----+--~--~----\ "'
Northwood St
Zi nf ande I Dr
Cardin! Dr
0 300
[:] Indian Reservations BIA
~ Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
W 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
C
1/3
lffl Areas of Concern
I\ 0
>
<
1/2 MIies
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.

CLIENT: Baez Geotechnical Group
CONTACT: Stefanie Parman
INQUIRY#: 7361112.5s
DATE: June 13, 2023 11 :57 am
Copyright© 2023 EDR, Inc.© 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

.

BeginOC−start−Wetlands−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−− State Wetlands−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− State Wetlands BeginOC−start−− National Wetlands Inventory−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− National Wetlands Inventory BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Wetlands BeginOC−start−Water−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Water BeginOC−start−Areas of Concern−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Areas of Concern BeginOC−start−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines BeginOC−start−Flood Zones−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−− 500 Year Zone−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 500 Year Zone BeginOC−start−− 100 Year Zone−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 100 Year Zone BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Flood Zones BeginOC−start−Streets−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Streets BeginOC−start−Railroads−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Railroads BeginOC−start−Contour Lines−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−Contour Lines−OffBeginOC−start 120
120
120
BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Contour Lines BeginOC−start−Target Property Location−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Target Property Location BeginOC−start−Federal DOD Records−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Federal DOD Records BeginOC−start−Indian Reservations BIA−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Indian Reservations BIA BeginOC−start−National Priority List Records−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−National Priority List Records BeginOC−start−Search Rings−BeginOC−start BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Search Rings SECONDARY MAP - 7361112.5S
Craig Rd
N Target Property
... Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
.1 Manufactured Gas Plants
[] National Priority List Sites
c:::::J Dept. Defense Sites
SITE NAME: Murphy Ranch
ADDRESS:

LAT/LONG:

Brennan Road & Yosemite Avenue
Escalon CA 95320

37.79769 / 121.011577
'
"' .,..

Ullery Ave
C
Clough Rd
"' r=-------.-------==~ 0
0 1/3
[:] Indian Reservations BIA
~ Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
W 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
• National Wetland Inventory
D State Wetlands
1/2
D Upgradient Area
B Areas of Concern
Ma h
1 MIies
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.

CLIENT: Baez Geotechnical Group
CONTACT: Stefanie Parman
INQUIRY#: 7361112.5s
DATE: June 13, 2023 11 :55 am
Copyright© 2023 EDR, Inc.© 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

LEGEND
DATABASE ACRONYM: Applicable categories (A hoverbox with database description).

FACILITY NAME

FACILITY ADDRESS, CITY, ST, ZIP EDR SITE ID NUMBER
◆ MAP ID#
Direction Distance Range (Distance feet / miles)
Relative Elevation Feet Above Sea Level
ASTM 2600 Record Sources found in this report. Each
database searched has been assigned to one or more
categories. For detailed information about categorization, see the section of the report Records Searched and
Currency.

Worksheet:

Comments:

Comments may be added on the online Vapor Encroachment Worksheet.

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 8

ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site listUS NPL National Priority List EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994Federal CERCLIS listUS SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listUS CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023Federal RCRA TSD facilities listUS RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023Federal RCRA generators listUS RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023US RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionall Environmental Protection Agency 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesUS LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 02/08/2023 02/09/2023 05/02/2023US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 02/20/2023 02/21/2023 05/02/2023US US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 02/20/2023 02/21/2023 05/02/2023Federal ERNS listUS ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 03/20/2023 03/21/2023 05/30/2023State and tribal - equivalent NPLCA RESPONSE State Response Sites Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/23/2023 01/24/2023 04/10/2023State and tribal - equivalent CERCLISCA ENVIROSTOR EnviroStor Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/23/2023 01/24/2023 04/10/2023State and tribal landfill / solid waste disposalCA SWF/LF (SWIS) Solid Waste Information System Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 02/06/2023 02/07/2023 04/26/2023State and tribal leaking storage tank listsCA LUST REG 4 Underground Storage Tank Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA LUST REG 5 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 07/01/2008 07/22/2008 07/31/2008CA LUST REG 7 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/26/2004 02/26/2004 03/24/2004CA LUST REG 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/14/2005 02/15/2005 03/28/2005CA LUST REG 3 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/19/2003 05/19/2003 06/02/2003CA LUST REG 2 Fuel Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA LUST REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigation California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/01/2001 02/28/2001 03/29/2001 TC7361112.5s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

CA LUST REG 6V Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 06/07/2005 06/07/2005 06/29/2005 CA LUST Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/30/2023CA LUST REG 6L Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/09/2003 09/10/2003 10/07/2003CA LUST REG 9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 03/01/2001 04/23/2001 05/21/2001US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 10/19/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 10/14/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 04/19/2023US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 10/14/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 11/26/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023CA CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA SLIC REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigations California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 04/25/2003CA SLIC REG 2 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board San Fran 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA SLIC REG 3 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/18/2006 05/18/2006 06/15/2006CA SLIC REG 4 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angele 11/17/2004 11/18/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 5 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board Central 04/01/2005 04/05/2005 04/21/2005CA SLIC REG 6V Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorv 05/24/2005 05/25/2005 06/16/2005CA SLIC REG 6L SLIC Sites California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA SLIC REG 7 SLIC List California Regional Quality Control Board, Co 11/24/2004 11/29/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 8 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Region Water Quality Control Board 04/03/2008 04/03/2008 04/14/2008CA SLIC REG 9 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/10/2007 09/11/2007 09/28/2007State and tribal registered storage tank listsCA UST Active UST Facilities SWRCB 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/24/2023CA MILITARY UST SITES Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA UST CLOSURE Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases State Water Resources Control Board 02/23/2023 03/07/2023 05/26/2023CA AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities California Environmental Protection Agency 07/06/2016 07/12/2016 09/19/2016US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 10/14/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 04/19/2023US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 10/19/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 11/23/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 10/14/2022 12/06/2022 03/03/2023US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 03/08/2023 03/09/2023 05/30/2023State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesUS INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008CA VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/23/2023 01/24/2023 04/10/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

State and tribal Brownfields sites
CA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing State Water Resources Control Board 03/20/2023 03/21/2023 06/06/2023Other RecordsUS CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 12/31/2022 01/12/2023 04/07/2023US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023CA HIST CAL-SITES Calsites Database Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/08/2005 08/03/2006 08/24/2006US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009CA SWRCY Recycler Database Department of Conservation 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/24/2023CA CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database California Environmental Protection Agency 10/31/1994 09/05/1995 09/29/1995CA HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database State Water Resources Control Board 10/15/1990 01/25/1991 02/12/1991CA SAN FRANCISCO AST Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing San Francisco County Department of Public Hea 02/03/2023 02/07/2023 04/25/2023CA SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing State Water Resources Control Board 06/01/1994 07/07/2005 08/11/2005US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/13/2023 03/21/2023 05/30/2023US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2020 11/30/2021 02/22/2022US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 03/03/2023 03/03/2023 06/09/2023US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 01/06/2023 02/02/2023 02/10/2023US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 01/12/2017 03/05/2019 11/11/2019US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2019 11/06/2019 02/10/2020US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 07/30/2021 02/03/2023 02/10/2023US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 03/06/2023 03/09/2023 03/20/2023US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 03/19/2023 03/21/2023 05/30/2023US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 01/02/2020 01/28/2020 04/17/2020US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 01/06/2023 02/02/2023 02/10/2023US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 04/06/2023 04/13/2023 04/19/2023US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 06/07/2021 07/13/2021 03/09/2022US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 04/02/2018 04/11/2018 11/06/2019US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 02/01/2023 02/14/2023 05/02/2023US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 08/30/2019 11/15/2019 01/28/2020US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US MINES VIOLATIONS MSHA Violation Assessment Data DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi 04/03/2023 04/04/2023 06/09/2023US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 02/02/2023 02/22/2023 05/17/2023US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 01/07/2022 02/24/2023 05/17/2023US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 04/26/2023 05/02/2023 05/17/2023US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2021 02/16/2023 05/02/2023US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2020 06/14/2022 03/24/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009 US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 01/17/2023 01/18/2023 04/19/2023US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 03/20/2023 04/04/2023 06/09/2023US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 03/15/2023 03/21/2023 05/30/2023US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2019 07/01/2019 09/23/2019US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 02/02/2023 02/28/2023 03/24/2023US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 04/27/2022 05/04/2022 05/10/2022US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2021 03/09/2023 03/20/2023US PWS Public Water System Data EPA 12/17/2013 01/09/2014 10/15/2014US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 03/17/2023 03/17/2023 05/30/2023CA CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services 01/01/1989 07/27/1994 08/02/1994CA CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Department of Toxic Substances Control 12/31/2020 11/30/2022 02/09/2023CA CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Office of Emergency Services 08/02/2022 10/17/2022 01/04/2023CA CORTESE "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information 03/20/2023 03/21/2023 06/06/2023CA CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON CUPA Facility Listing Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department 12/07/2021 05/09/2022 05/17/2022CA DEED Deed Restriction Listing DTSC and SWRCB 02/27/2023 02/28/2023 05/17/2023CA DRYCLEAN NO SONOMA CO DISTNorther Sonoma County County Air Pollution Control District Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control Di 04/17/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN PLACER CO DIST Placer County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Fac Placer County Air Quality Management District 01/16/2018 04/19/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN BAY AREA DIST Bay Area Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Bay Area Air Quality Management District 02/20/2019 05/30/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN BUTTE CO DIST Butte County Air Quality Management DistrictDrycleaner Facil Butte County Air Quality Management District 12/31/2018 04/23/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN CALAVERAS CO DIST Calaveras County Environmental Management Agency Drycleaner Calaveras County Environmental Management Age 06/17/2019 06/19/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN EAST KERN DIST Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District District Dryclea Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District 04/17/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN GLENN CO DIST Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facil Glenn County Air Pollution Control District 04/17/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN GRANT Grant Recipients List California Air Resources Board 12/31/2020 02/04/2021 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN IMPERIAL CO DIST Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Fa Imperial County Air Pollution Control Distric 05/14/2019 05/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN LAKE CO DIST Lake County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facil Lake County Air Quality Management District 04/29/2019 05/07/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN MENDO CO DIST Mendocino County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Mendocino County Air Quality Management Distr 02/08/2019 05/21/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN MOJAVE DESERT DISTMojave Desert Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Fac Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 04/17/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN MONTEREY BAY DISTMonterey Bay Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Faci Monterey Bay Air Quality Management District 04/17/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN NO COAST UNIFIED DISTNorth Coast Unified Air Quality Management District Dryclean North Coast Unified Air Quality Management Di 11/30/2016 04/19/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN NO SIERRA DIST Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Drycleaner F Northern Sierra Air Quality Management Distri 05/07/2019 05/07/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SAN DIEGO CO DIST San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner F San Diego County Air Pollution Control Distri 02/01/2019 05/01/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SACRAMENTO METO DISTSacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management DistrictDrycl Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Managemen 04/24/2019 04/25/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SANTA BARB CO DISTSanta Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Dryclean Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control Di 02/19/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SAN JOAQ VAL DIST San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District District D San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Dist 05/01/2019 05/03/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SAN LUIS OB CO DISTSan Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District Drycle San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control 04/23/2019 04/25/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SHASTA CO DIST Shasta County Air Quality Management District District Drycl Shasta County Air Quality Management District 04/17/2019 04/19/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN TEHAMA CO DIST Tehama County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Faci Tehama County Air Pollution Control District 04/24/2019 04/24/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN YOLO-SOLANO DIST Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facil Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District 05/31/2019 06/06/2019 05/01/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

CA DRYCLEAN FEATHER RIVER DISTFeather River Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Fac Feather River Air Quality Management District 03/08/2023 03/09/2023 06/05/2023 CA DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/27/2021 09/01/2021 11/19/2021CA DRYCLEAN VENTURA CO DIST Drycleaner Facility Listing Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 04/16/2019 04/17/2019 05/01/2023CA DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listi South Coast Air Quality Management District 02/17/2023 02/17/2023 05/09/2023CA DRYCLEAN AVAQMD Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner L Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Distri 02/23/2023 02/24/2023 05/15/2023CA EMI Emissions Inventory Data California Air Resources Board 12/31/2020 06/13/2022 08/30/2022CA ENF Enforcement Action Listing State Water Resoruces Control Board 01/10/2023 01/18/2023 04/04/2023CA Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/11/2023 01/17/2023 04/04/2023CA Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing California Integrated Waste Management Board 02/06/2023 02/15/2023 05/09/2023CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing Integrated Waste Management Board 11/16/2022 11/22/2022 02/13/2023CA HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data California Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/2021 07/05/2022 09/19/2022CA HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/01/2001 01/22/2009 04/08/2009CA HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 02/13/2023 02/14/2023 05/08/2023CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/03/2023 01/04/2023 03/21/2023CA ICE ICE Department of Toxic Subsances Control 02/13/2023 02/14/2023 05/08/2023CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Qualilty Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/30/2023CA LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 02/23/2023 02/24/2023 03/23/2023CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA MINES Mines Site Location Listing Department of Conservation 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/23/2023CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing Department of Public Health 01/09/2023 02/28/2023 05/17/2023CA NPDES NPDES Permits Listing State Water Resources Control Board 02/06/2023 02/07/2023 04/28/2023CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing Department of Pesticide Regulation 02/27/2023 02/28/2023 05/22/2023CA PROC Certified Processors Database Department of Conservation 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA NOTIFY 65 Proposition 65 Records State Water Resources Control Board 03/09/2023 03/10/2023 05/24/2023CA SAN JOSE HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities City of San Jose Fire Department 11/03/2020 11/05/2020 01/26/2021CA SCH School Property Evaluation Program Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/23/2023 01/24/2023 04/10/2023CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 06/06/2012 01/03/2013 02/22/2013CA TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/1995 08/30/1995 09/26/1995CA UIC UIC Listing Deaprtment of Conservation 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing RWQCB, Central Valley Region 02/11/2021 07/01/2021 09/29/2021CA WDS Waste Discharge System State Water Resources Control Board 06/19/2007 06/20/2007 06/29/2007CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board 07/03/2009 07/21/2009 08/03/2009CA WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database State Water Resources Control Board 04/01/2000 04/10/2000 05/10/2000CA MILITARY PRIV SITES Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA NON-CASE INFO Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023US PFAS TSCA PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 06/09/2023US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/25/2023 03/31/2023 06/09/2023US PFAS NPL Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information Environmental Protection Agency 06/07/2023 06/08/2023 06/09/2023CA AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/23/2023US PFAS TRIS List of PFAS Added to the TRI Environmental Protection Agency 06/07/2023 06/08/2023 06/09/2023CA CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE CalEPA 01/05/2023 01/06/2023 01/11/2023CA CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks California Environmental Protection Agency 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/11/2023US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/06/2021 05/21/2021 08/11/2021US MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System USGS 08/23/2022 11/22/2022 02/28/2023US PFAS WQP Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 05/02/2023US PFAS RCRA MANIFEST PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 05/02/2023US AQUEOUS FOAM NRC Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing Environmental Protection Agency 04/27/2023 04/27/2023 05/02/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023 CA PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/05/2023CA UIC GEO Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resource Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA SAMPLING POINT Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA PROJECT Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023CA PROD WATER PONDS Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023US PFAS ATSDR PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing Department of Health & Human Services 06/24/2020 03/17/2021 11/08/2022US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 11/09/2021 10/20/2022 01/10/2023US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 02/13/2023 02/14/2023 04/19/2023CA WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 05/24/2023US PFAS FEDERAL SITES Federal Sites PFAS Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 04/07/2023US PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 04/03/2023US PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 04/03/2023US PFAS ECHO Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 04/03/2023CA OTHER OIL GAS Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 03/06/2023 03/07/2023 03/31/2023US PFAS NPDES Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/30/2023 03/30/2023 04/07/2023CA CERS CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data California Environmental Protection Agency 01/05/2023 01/06/2023 01/10/2023CA HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/05/2022 04/05/2022 04/26/2022CA CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System State Water Resources Control Board 02/27/2023 02/28/2023 05/17/2023US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/26/2023 03/28/2023 05/30/2023HISTORICAL USE RECORDSUS EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 07/01/2013 01/13/2014CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/2013 12/30/2013COUNTY RECORDSCA CS ALAMEDA Contaminated Sites Alameda County Environmental Health Services 01/09/2019 01/11/2019 03/05/2019CA UST ALAMEDA Underground Tanks Alameda County Environmental Health Services 12/28/2022 12/28/2022 03/17/2023CA CUPA AMADOR CUPA Facility List Amador County Environmental Health 01/31/2023 02/02/2023 04/19/2023CA CUPA BUTTE CUPA Facility Listing Public Health Department 04/21/2017 04/25/2017 08/09/2017CA CUPA CALVERAS CUPA Facility Listing Calveras County Environmental Health 03/17/2023 03/21/2023 06/06/2023CA CUPA COLUSA CUPA Facility List Health & Human Services 04/06/2020 04/23/2020 07/10/2020CA SL CONTRA COSTA Site List Contra Costa Health Services Department 12/28/2022 01/24/2023 04/10/2023CA CUPA DEL NORTE CUPA Facility List Del Norte County Environmental Health Divisio 02/13/2023 02/14/2023 05/08/2023CA CUPA EL DORADO CUPA Facility List El Dorado County Environmental Management Dep 08/08/2022 08/09/2022 09/01/2022CA CUPA FRESNO CUPA Resources List Dept. of Community Health 06/28/2021 12/21/2021 03/03/2022CA CUPA GLENN CUPA Facility List Glenn County Air Pollution Control District 01/22/2018 01/24/2018 03/14/2018CA CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA Facility List Humboldt County Environmental Health 08/12/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA CUPA IMPERIAL CUPA Facility List San Diego Border Field Office 01/13/2023 01/17/2023 04/04/2023CA CUPA INYO CUPA Facility List Inyo County Environmental Health Services 04/02/2018 04/03/2018 06/14/2018CA CUPA KERN CUPA Facility List Kern County Public Health 01/30/2023 02/01/2023 04/19/2023CA UST KERN Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Environment Health Services Depar 01/30/2023 02/01/2023 04/21/2023CA CUPA KINGS CUPA Facility List Kings County Department of Public Health 12/03/2020 01/26/2021 04/14/2021CA CUPA LAKE CUPA Facility List Lake County Environmental Health 04/26/2023 04/27/2023 05/31/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

CA CUPA LASSEN CUPA Facility List Lassen County Environmental Health 07/31/2020 08/21/2020 11/09/2020 CA AOCONCERN Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County 03/30/2009 03/31/2009 10/23/2009CA HMS LOS ANGELES HMS: Street Number List Department of Public Works 01/09/2023 01/12/2023 03/29/2023CA LF LOS ANGELES List of Solid Waste Facilities La County Department of Public Works 01/09/2023 01/10/2023 03/23/2023CA LF LOS ANGELES CITY City of Los Angeles Landfills Engineering & Construction Division 12/31/2022 01/12/2023 03/29/2023CA LOS ANGELES AST Active & Inactive AST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 06/01/2019 06/25/2019 08/22/2019CA LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Methane Producing Landfills Los Angeles County Department of Public Works 01/10/2022 01/12/2022 04/04/2022CA LOS ANGELES HM Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 11/01/2022 12/14/2022 03/07/2023CA LOS ANGELES UST Active & Inactive UST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 11/01/2022 12/14/2022 03/07/2023CA SITE MIT LOS ANGELES Site Mitigation List Community Health Services 05/26/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA UST EL SEGUNDO City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank City of El Segundo Fire Department 01/21/2017 04/19/2017 05/10/2017CA UST LONG BEACH City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank City of Long Beach Fire Department 04/22/2019 04/23/2019 06/27/2019CA UST TORRANCE City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank City of Torrance Fire Department 10/18/2022 10/19/2022 01/10/2023CA CUPA MADERA CUPA Facility List Madera County Environmental Health 08/10/2020 08/12/2020 10/23/2020CA UST MARIN Underground Storage Tank Sites Public Works Department Waste Management 09/26/2018 10/04/2018 11/02/2018CA UST MENDOCINO Mendocino County UST Database Department of Public Health 09/22/2021 11/18/2021 11/22/2021CA CUPA MERCED CUPA Facility List Merced County Environmental Health 02/15/2022 02/17/2022 05/11/2022CA CUPA MONO CUPA Facility List Mono County Health Department 02/22/2021 03/02/2021 05/19/2021CA CUPA MONTEREY CUPA Facility Listing Monterey County Health Department 10/04/2021 10/06/2021 12/29/2021CA LUST NAPA Sites With Reported Contamination Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 01/09/2017 01/11/2017 03/02/2017CA UST NAPA Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 09/05/2019 09/09/2019 10/31/2019CA CUPA NEVADA CUPA Facility List Community Development Agency 01/23/2023 01/25/2023 04/10/2023CA IND_SITE ORANGE List of Industrial Site Cleanups Health Care Agency 02/02/2023 02/09/2023 05/09/2023CA LUST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Health Care Agency 02/02/2023 02/09/2023 05/04/2023CA UST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Health Care Agency 02/06/2023 02/09/2023 05/03/2023CA MS PLACER Master List of Facilities Placer County Health and Human Services 08/26/2022 08/29/2022 11/15/2022CA CUPA PLUMAS CUPA Facility List Plumas County Environmental Health 03/31/2019 04/23/2019 06/26/2019CA LUST RIVERSIDE Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Department of Environmental Health 01/18/2023 01/19/2023 04/04/2023CA UST RIVERSIDE Underground Storage Tank Tank List Department of Environmental Health 01/18/2023 01/19/2023 04/04/2023CA CS SACRAMENTO Toxic Site Clean-Up List Sacramento County Environmental Management 11/07/2022 12/21/2022 03/16/2023CA ML SACRAMENTO Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Sacramento County Environmental Management 11/07/2022 12/09/2022 03/01/2023CA CUPA SAN BENITO CUPA Facility List San Benito County Environmental Health 02/08/2023 02/09/2023 05/04/2023CA PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO Hazardous Material Permits San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardo 02/15/2023 02/15/2023 05/09/2023CA HMMD SAN DIEGO Hazardous Materials Management Division Database Hazardous Materials Management Division 02/27/2023 02/28/2023 05/17/2023CA LF SAN DIEGO Solid Waste Facilities Department of Health Services 10/27/2021 03/04/2022 05/31/2022CA SAN DIEGO CO LOP Local Oversight Program Listing Department of Environmental Health 07/22/2021 10/19/2021 01/13/2022CA SAN DIEGO CO SAM Environmental Case Listing San Diego County Department of Environmental 03/23/2010 06/15/2010 07/09/2010CA CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO CUPA Facility Listing San Francisco County Department of Environmen 02/03/2023 02/07/2023 04/26/2023CA LUST SAN FRANCISCO Local Oversite Facilities Department Of Public Health San Francisco Cou 09/19/2008 09/19/2008 09/29/2008CA UST SAN FRANCISCO Underground Storage Tank Information Department of Public Health 04/28/2023 04/28/2023 05/03/2023CA SAN FRANCISCO MAHER Maher Ordinance Property Listing San Francisco Planning 10/11/2022 10/14/2022 01/04/2023CA UST SAN JOAQUIN San Joaquin Co. UST Environmental Health Department 06/22/2018 06/26/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO CUPA Facility List San Luis Obispo County Public Health Departme 02/09/2023 02/10/2023 05/05/2023CA BI SAN MATEO Business Inventory San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 02/20/2020 02/20/2020 04/24/2020CA LUST SAN MATEO Fuel Leak List San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 03/29/2019 03/29/2019 05/29/2019CA CUPA SANTA BARBARA CUPA Facility Listing Santa Barbara County Public Health Department 09/08/2011 09/09/2011 10/07/2011CA CUPA SANTA CLARA Cupa Facility List Department of Environmental Health 02/10/2023 02/10/2023 05/05/2023 TC7361112.5s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

CA HIST LUST SANTA CLARA HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Santa Clara Valley Water District 03/29/2005 03/30/2005 04/21/2005 CA LUST SANTA CLARA LOP Listing Department of Environmental Health 03/03/2014 03/05/2014 03/18/2014CA CUPA SANTA CRUZ CUPA Facility List Santa Cruz County Environmental Health 01/21/2017 02/22/2017 05/23/2017CA CUPA SHASTA CUPA Facility List Shasta County Department of Resource Manageme 06/15/2017 06/19/2017 08/09/2017CA LUST SOLANO Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 06/04/2019 06/06/2019 08/13/2019CA UST SOLANO Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 09/15/2021 09/16/2021 12/09/2021CA CUPA SONOMA Cupa Facility List County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services De 07/02/2021 07/06/2021 07/14/2021CA LUST SONOMA Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Department of Health Services 06/30/2021 06/30/2021 09/24/2021CA CUPA STANISLAUS CUPA Facility List Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmenta 02/08/2022 02/10/2022 05/04/2022CA UST SUTTER Underground Storage Tanks Sutter County Environmental Health Services 08/03/2022 08/25/2022 11/14/2022CA CUPA TEHAMA CUPA Facility List Tehama County Department of Environmental Hea 11/17/2022 11/21/2022 02/10/2023CA CUPA TRINITY CUPA Facility List Department of Toxic Substances Control 01/13/2023 01/17/2023 04/04/2023CA CUPA TULARE CUPA Facility List Tulare County Environmental Health Services D 10/07/2022 10/07/2022 12/21/2022CA CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA Facility List Divison of Environmental Health 04/23/2018 04/25/2018 06/25/2018CA BWT VENTURA Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Unde Ventura County Environmental Health Division 12/27/2022 01/26/2023 04/19/2023CA LF VENTURA Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Environmental Health Division 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 01/19/2012CA LUST VENTURA Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Environmental Health Division 05/29/2008 06/24/2008 07/31/2008CA MED WASTE VENTURA Medical Waste Program List Ventura County Resource Management Agency 12/27/2022 01/26/2023 04/19/2023CA UST VENTURA Underground Tank Closed Sites List Environmental Health Division 02/27/2023 03/07/2023 05/24/2023CA UST YOLO Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Yolo County Department of Health 12/19/2022 12/27/2022 03/17/2023CA CUPA YUBA CUPA Facility List Yuba County Environmental Health Department 01/26/2023 01/27/2023 04/19/2023STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC7361112.5s Page GR−8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

APPENDIX K
Sources of Information and Documentation
ESA Property Owner Questionnaires

RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION
Table 1 – Sources of Information
Company Contact
or City, State or
other Agency
Document or
Organization
Date of
Contact or
Document
Phone Number or
Contact or
Reference
Information
Sought
Environmental Data
Resources, Inc.

Inquiry No. 7361112
for Murphy Ranch
Brennan Road and
Yosemite Avenue,
Escalon, California
June 13, 2023 (800) 352-0050;
web.edrnet.com
Regulatory Database Radius
Search of Federal, State and
Local Agencies, Sanborn Map
Search, Aerial Photographs,
Topographic Maps, City
Directory, Environmental AUL
and Lien Search
San Joaquin County,
California
Environmental Health
Department
July 27, 2023 (209) 468-3420
www.sjgov.org/depa
rtment/envhealth
Request for records of any AST
or UST, contaminant or hazmat
files for property addresses and
APN.

California State Water
Resources Control
Board
Underground Storage
Tank Cleanup Fund
July 27, 2023 www.waterboards.ca.g
ov
Request for records of any AST
or UST, contaminant or hazmat
files for property addresses and
APN.

California
Department of Toxic
Substances Control
Envirostor and DTSC
Data Management
July 27, 2023 (916) 255-4159;
[email protected]
ov
Request for records of any AST
or UST, contaminant or hazmat
files for property addresses and
APN.

Google Earth© Google June 15, 2023 Web application Historic aerial and recent site photographs of site region.

State of California GeoTracker Website July 27, 2023 GeoTracker.com Listings for leaking USTs or spill information for the site
address
State of California Dept. of Toxic Substances July 27, 2023 ENVIROSTOR.com Listings for leaking USTs or spill information for the site
address
State of California California Geological
Survey Fault Activity
Map
2010 California Geological
Survey website –
https://maps.conservati
on.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp
/app/
Official mapping for active fault
locations in the State.

State of California Dept. of Water Resources Revised 2003, pub. June 1974
Bulletin No. 118 General regional groundwater
information for the property
region.

State of California California Division of
Mines and Geology
1991 Geologic Map of the
San Francisco-San Jose
Quadrangle
Regional geologic information.

AS1'M E 1527 -OS

PROPERTY OWNER/USER QUESTIONNAIRE

INTRODUCTION
Jn order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (L/,Ps)" offe.red by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the "Brown.fields Amendments")", the user must provide the following infomiation (if available) to the emironme11ta/ pro/ess/011al, Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that "all appropriate inquiry" is not complete. (I) Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25).

Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state, or local law?
-<io cf-he.-J,,e~o-f ff/? y /4ntJw!e3e,
1 /JoJ11 e
(2) Activity and land use limitations that are in place on lhesile or th1t have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 312.26).

Are you aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional ccn/ro/s that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or rec0<ded In a registry under federal, tribal, state, or local law? °vo +he-Joa,..J-0.P 111/ k11~wM9e.r .A/of/?e,,
(3) Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28).

As the user of this ESA do you have any specialized knowledge or eJCperience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have spedallzed knowledge of the chemicals and processes u:;;;Y~: 0 ~::s?o+: P1/ l<r1ovl=4,e:. /r01erl-;1--hr"'1~ .. 0 ~f_,•~ ( 4) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property If it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29).

Does the purchase price being paid IO< this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there Is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? ,1 < , /I JJ 1 . ,4-- =r-o +-he. pets f 19.{; /fA. 7 t<//fo/etl. 1c..,,,.l'1,tre,kse frice.' S Ta•rtt:><~ (S) Commonly known or re,isonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30).

Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable infonnation about the property that would help the environmental professional to Identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as the user. do you: /
(a) Know the past uses of the property? ,?.-.:;·d.,.J ,,.,_ 1 D"'j T n,,,.,:"'.:), ~r""'~"':11 / ,'ve~~ (b) Know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? h/A (c) Know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? N/A (d) Know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? ,i?IA (6) The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate invtstigation (40 CFR 312.31).

As the user of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Property APN 225-04-029 /~, I I kC,
Completed By (};e,,+-~ /'-{""r(2,l.,t I I
Relationship to Property /0,,..,,'J'·":4 1"1e,,.,J.er
Address ~f"'.

Signature~~
t-L~ Dale fa /(3/ ZQZ..'z I I
n Umdowner liability Pro1ec1ions, or llPs. is the tenn used to describe the three types of potential defenses to Superfun.d liability in EPA 0$ Interim Guidance Regarding Criteria londowners Must Meet i,r Order for Bolfa J-'7de Pr<JSpectivt Purchaser. Contiguous Property Owner, or /1111ocen1 Landowner limitations on CERCD liability tCommon Elements" Guide) issued on March 6, 2003. ,. P.L. 107-118.

ASTM E 1527-05

PROPERTY OWNER/USER QUESTIONNAIRE

INTRODUCTION
In order to qualify for one of the landowner Liability Protections (Ll,Ps)" offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownficlds Revitalization Act of 2001 (the "Brown.fields Amendments")' 6, the user must provide the following infonnation (if available) to the e11viro11mental profess/onul. Failure to provide this infonnation could result in a detennination that "all appropriate inquiry" is not complete. (I) Environmental deanup liens that ore filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25).

Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that ate fifed or recorded under federal, tribal, state, or local law?
4';; ../-he pe=-+- c:+ ;,vrykvrt{Jw/eo/~/ J/4ne
(2) Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 31?.26).

Are you aware of any AUls, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions. or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state, or local law? Jo orhe..Joes+ t> .(2. fr?f kv1ovle5e I i/o//1 e-.
(3) Specialized knowledge or e•perience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28).

As the user of this ESA do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same fine of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
Jt? 4-he. hesr t£>P 1v1y~170t,A/le~~/ £,.-,.,.,c~.,,,d ?--./ves/2ck. (4) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29).

Does the purchase pr'ce being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair mar1<et value of the property? It you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? f) I) ...(-- y;;; </--Mc: pe~f- c.P p1/ l(;10:J'e5'~ rt,<.rek.~e-,Pn"Qe ,'s -+c<,,,,/1k (S) Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30).

Are you aware of comnonly known or reasonably ascertainable infonnation about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as the user, do you:
(a) Knowthepastusesoftheproperty? ~.s.'c/e,,</-,',:,/, r;;,,wtf..,:) /,'ve..s~ (b) Know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? ~A- (c) Know or spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the pro{)6rty? ,1,1, (d) Know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? ¾ (6) The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence or contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31).

As the user of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Property APN 225-04-028 /, ~k&., Address "'"-:; / . .,
Completed By {l,/4er5fe.r µt.A.rt1/;L Signature ~~---
Relationship to Property ;t/4,<_,7,t,'l; ftJe&&-rL</oate ~ /1 :?,hoz 3 >, IA.ndowner liability Pro1ec1lom. or llPs, is lhc lcnn used lo describe the three types of poten1ial defenses to Superfund liabili1y in EPA 's Jnttrlm Guidance Regarding Criteria landowners Must Meet in Order for Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser. Contiguous Property Owner, or Innocent landowner Limitatiom 011 CERCD Liability ("Common Eltmtnts'' Guide) issued on March 6, 2003. "P.t.. 107-118.

APPENDIX L
Resume for William R. Stevens, PE, GE

RESUME OF QUALIFICATIONS for
WILLIAM R. STEVENS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
William R. Stevens has diversified experience in Civil and Geotechnical Engineering and engineering geologic studies in California and other States. He has managed environmental projects, including Phase 1, 2 and 3 Environmental Site Assessments, and provided geotechnical and geologic input for Environmental Impact Reports. He has also developed testing programs and protocols for additional screening for contaminant soil and groundwater assessment, sampling, and groundwater monitoring well design and installation.

Project experience includes assessments at military and industrial sites, commercial sites, and residential developments. Mr. Stevens has more than 35 years of experience in the disciplines of Civil and Geotechnical Engineering.

EDUCATION
University of Virginia, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1981 University of Arizona, Master of Science in Geological Engineering, 1985

CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Training (40 hour, with annual 8 hour updates), 1989 Radiation Safety, 1999

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
State of California Professional Engineer Civil No. 43010, Geotechnical No. 2339 State of Arizona Professional Engineer Civil No. 41866
State of Hawaii Professional Engineer No. 10347
State of Idaho Civil Engineer No. 010181
State of Nevada Professional Engineer No. 014272
State of Utah Professional Engineer No. 372006-2202

PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Rock Mechanics Association
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

APPENDIX F
NOISE REPORT

Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development

Escalon, California
BAC Job # 2023-086
Prepared For:

NRB Investments, dba Florsheim Homes
John Pronoitis
1701 W. March Ln, Ste D
Stockton, CA 95207
Prepared By:

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc.

Paul Bollard, President
September 8, 2023
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) P.O. Box 7968  Auburn, CA 95604 (530) 537-2328 BACNOISE.COM

BOLLARD
Acoustical Consultants

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Introduction
The Murphy Ranch residential development (project) is located in the City of Escalon, California.

The project proposes the development of approximately 73 single-family residential units with a common use park. The project site is bordered by a railroad tracks and Yosemite Avenue to the north, Banner Avenue to the west, and existing single-family homes to the south and east. The project area and site plan are provided as Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Due to the noise-sensitivity of the proposed residential project and the proximity of the project site to Yosemite Avenue (State Route 120), Banner Avenue, and the railroad branch line, Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) was retained by the project applicant to prepare this noise assessment. Specifically, the purposes of this assessment are to quantify noise levels associated with traffic and railroad operations, and to compare those levels against the applicable City of Escalon noise standards for acceptable noise exposure, and to recommend noise mitigation measures where appropriate. This report contains BAC’s evaluation.

Noise Fundamentals and Terminology
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard, and thus are called sound. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB. Another useful aspect of the decibel scale is that changes in levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Appendix A contains definitions of Acoustical Terminology. Figure 3 shows common noise levels associated with various sources.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by weighing the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighing network.

There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and community response to noise. For this reason, the A-weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels in decibels.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the “ambient” noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq) over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the Day-Night Average Level noise descriptor, Ldn or DNL, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

Legend
Figure 1
Project Area
Murphy Ranch
Escalon, California
0 200 400
Scale (Feet)
Project Boundary (Approximate)
UPRR/BNSF Railroad Spur Line
1 California St Walnut Ave
1 st St Brennan Rd
Yosemite Ave Riesling Way
Ambient Noise Measurement Locations
2 ~~BOLLARD "J )t Acoustical Consutants

Existing Noise Barriers
Recommended Window Assembly Upgrades: STC 32 (Upper-Floors Only) Legend
Figure 2
Recommended 6-Foot Tall Noise Barrier
Site Plan
Murphy Ranch
Escalon, California
0 100 200
Scale (Feet)
PARK
70 67 71 60 61 47
1 6

UNION PACIFIC / BNSF RAILROAD SPUR LINE
YOSEMITE AVENUE (SR-120)

BRENNAN AVENUE
_ _j I \ ______________ __ ... _ •• ---"----
--•--'--
..
.. . .. . .. .

I '
. , . ( ., ? .,. . ,. . , . ,. !
- tI
I
Ii - rJ '" hi , •· ! I IT • ! T , ! .

I .. r
CJ

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Figure 3
Typical A-Weighted Sound Levels of Common Noise Sources The Day-Night Average Level (DNL) is based upon the average noise level over a 24-hour day, with a +10-decibel weighting applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because DNL represents a 24-hour average, it tends to disguise short-term variations in the noise environment. DNL-based noise standards are commonly used to assess noise impacts associated with traffic, railroad, and aircraft noise sources.

Decibel Scale (dBA)*
12· Gau go Shotgun HiO
Jet Ta kootf 140
f'ne urn a tic Riveter 124
i'la mmer llril I 114 : Chamsaw 110
Mctim:yel~ 100
Lawn Mows 90
V~C4Jum Cleaner 80
City Traffic 78
~ --, .. ,_,_,WO)l_!l:i'ffltill:..ifli&m
-~·----'"'-

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Criteria for Acceptable Noise Exposure
Escalon General Plan Noise Element
Chapter 1 of the City of Escalon General Plan contains the City’s Noise Element. The Noise Element establishes the following policies and standards pertaining to this project:

Policy 1 Areas shall be recognized as noise impacted if exposed to existing or projected future noise levels at the exterior of buildings in excess of 65 dB Ldn (or CNEL).

Policy 2 Noise sensitive land uses should be discouraged in noise impacted areas unless effective mitigation measures are incorporated into the specific design of such projects to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 dB Ldn (or CNEL) or less and 45 dB Ldn (or CNEL) or less within interior living spaces. Noise sensitive land uses include hospitals, residences, schools, churches, and other uses of a similar nature as determined by the Planning Director.

Policy 6 The preferred method of noise control used is thoughtful site design. Secondarily, noise control should be achieved through the use of artificial noise barriers. Site and building design guidelines may include:
a. Noise sensitive land uses should not front onto the primary noise source.

Where this is not possible, the narrow portion of the building should face the primary noise source, and the interior layout should locate the most sensitive areas away from the noise source by placing garages, storage facilities, carports or other such areas nearest the noise source.
b. Site design should permit noise to pass around or through a development. This can be achieved by placing the narrow or convex portion of the structure toward the primary noise source.
d. Two-story residential construction should be avoided, where possible, immediately adjacent to arterials or collectors unless an adequate combination of noise attenuation procedures are used.
e. When possible, residential cul-de-sacs should be perpendicular to adjacent arterials or collectors.

Existing Ambient Noise Environment within the Project Vicinity The existing ambient noise environment at the project site is defined primarily by traffic on Yosemite Avenue (State Route 120) and Banner Avenue, and by intermittent railroad activity on an adjacent railroad branch line to the north. To quantify the existing ambient noise level environment at the project site, BAC conducted a long-term (96-hour) noise level survey from August 3rd through August 7th, 2023 at the locations shown on Figure 1. Long-term noise measurement site LT-1 was selected to quantify noise generated by Yosemite Avenue traffic and railroad operations. LT-2 was selected to quantify noise generated by Banner Avenue traffic and railroad operations. Photographs of the noise survey locations are provided in Appendix B.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Larson-Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 831 and Model LxT precision integrating sound level meters were used to complete the ambient noise level survey. The meters were calibrated immediately before and after use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

The long-term ambient noise level survey results are summarized in Table 1. The detailed results of the ambient noise survey are contained in Appendix C in tabular format and graphically in Appendix D.

Table 1
Summary of Long-Term Noise Survey Measurement Results1
Average Hourly Noise Levels [dBA]
Daytime3 Nighttime4
Site2 Description Date DNL [dBA] Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
LT-1 175' to RR; 230' to Yosemite Ave 8/3/2023 61 54 72 55 78 8/4/2023 63 54 66 56 72
8/5/2023 62 54 69 55 71
8/6/2023 62 54 68 56 71
8/7/2023 63 55 65 57 72
Average 62 54 68 56 73
LT-2 75' to RR; 45' to Brennan Ave 8/3/2023 72 62 82 66 87 8/4/2023 71 62 78 65 79
8/5/2023 68 61 80 62 76
8/6/2023 65 61 79 58 75
8/7/2023 68 62 75 61 78
Average 69 61 79 62 79
Notes

1. Detailed summaries of the noise monitoring results are provided in Appendices C and D.

2. Long-term noise survey locations are identified on Figure 1.

3. Daytime hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.

4. Nighttime hours: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2023)
Table 1 indicates that the measured day-night average noise levels (DNL) at LT-1 averaged 62 dB—below the City’s 65 dB DNL exterior noise level standard. The measured DNL at LT-2 averaged 69 dB—above the City’s exterior noise level standard. Furthermore, the graphical noise level data, shown in Appendix D, indicates that only one heavy rail train passby was observed during the 96-hour ambient noise survey period. Therefore, the ambient noise level data is primarily driven by roadway traffic.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Evaluation of Future Traffic & Railroad Noise Levels at the Project Site Methodology & Results
To predict future roadway traffic and railroad noise level exposure at the project site, BAC utilized the long-term ambient data collected at measurement sites LT-1 and LT-2. Specifically, the noise measurement data were projected to the nearest noise-sensitive locations on the project site.

Since the UPRR/BNSF railway spur line operations are infrequent, it was conservatively estimated that the future noise level exposure at the project site would be primarily affect by an increase in roadway traffic. Therefore, future traffic volumes on Yosemite Avenue and Banner Avenue were conservatively assumed to increase by 100% in the future, resulting in a 3 dB increase in traffic noise levels relative to measured noise levels.

Future traffic and railroad noise levels were projected to the nearest proposed outdoor activity areas (backyards) and building facades of the development based on a 4.5 dB decrease per doubling of distance from the noise source. The results of those projections at those locations are provided in Table 2. Table 2 also indicates whether noise levels within the outdoor activity areas would exceed the applicable standard, thereby requiring noise mitigation. Finally, Table 2 indicates where additional analysis of interior noise levels would be required.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Table 2
Predicted Future Traffic & Railroad Noise Levels at the Project Source Lotsa Receiver Location Offsets [dBA]
Predicted
DNL [dBA]
Mitigation or
Additional
Analysis
Required?d
Yosemite Ave & RR 1, 70 backyard -2b 69 Yes
1st-floor façade 0 71 Yes
2nd-floor façade 2c 73 Yes
Yosemite Ave & RR 2, 71 backyard -5b 62 No
1st-floor façade -5b 62 No
2nd-floor façade 2b 69 Yes
Yosemite Ave & RR 47, 67 backyard -2b 66 Yes
1st-floor façade 0 68 Yes
2nd-floor façade 2c 70 Yes
Yosemite Ave & RR 48 - 66 backyard -10b 55 No
1st-floor façade 0 67 Yes
2nd-floor façade 2c 69 Yes
Brennan Ave & RR 1 - 6 backyard 0 71 Yes
1st-floor façade 0 70 Yes
2nd-floor façade 2c 72 Yes
Yosemite Ave & RR park park -7b 53 No
Notes
a. Lots are shown on Figure 2.
b. An offset was applied due to shielding provided by intervening existing and/or proposed buildings. c. A +2 dB offset was applied at all upper-floor building facades to account for reduced ground absorption of sound at elevated positions.
d. Mitigaiton would be required if backyard noise levels exceed the City’s 65 dB DNL exterior noise standard. Additional analysis would be required to ensure that building construction would provide sufficient noise attenuation to satisfy the City’s 45 dB DNL interior noise standard.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc (2023)
Analysis of Future Exterior Noise Exposure at Outdoor Activity Areas As indicated in Table 2, future traffic noise levels at the proposed primary outdoor activity areas (backyards) are predicted to exceed the 65 dB DNL exterior noise level standard at Lots 1 – 6, and Lot 70. As a result, further consideration of exterior noise mitigation measures would be warranted for the project.

BAC evaluated the effectiveness of noise barriers constructed along residencies nearest to Yosemite Avenue and Brennan Avenue for the purposes of reducing future traffic and railroad noise exposure to a state of compliance with the General Plan exterior noise level standard. Table 3 shows the predicted noise levels at nearest backyards affected by the proposed barriers at various barrier heights.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Table 3
Predicted Future Traffic & Railroad Noise Levels with Noise Barriers Source Lots1
Barrier Height2
[ft]
Barrier Offset3
[dBA]
Predicted DNL
[dBA]
Additional
Mitigation
Required?
Yosemite Ave &
RR
1, 70 6 -6 63 No
7 -8 61 No
8 -10 59 No
Yosemite Ave &
RR
47, 67 6 -6 60 No
7 -8 58 No
8 -10 56 No
Brennan Ave &
RR
1 - 6 6 -6 65 No
7 -8 63 No
8 -10 61 No
Notes

1. Location of barrier is shown on Figure 2.

1. Barrier height is relative to the lot pad elevation.

2. Approximate noise reduction at ground level due to shielding provided by the proposed barrier.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc (2023)
Table 3 indicates that a minimum 6-foot-tall noise barrier is required for the nearest lots along Yosemite Avenue and Brennan Avenue. Figure 2 shows the location of the required noise barriers.

The noise barriers could take the form of masonry wall, earthen berm, or a combination of the two. A wood (or wood composite) fence would also be a sufficient noise barrier provided that the fence slats overlap by a minimum of 2-inches and are screwed to the framing rather than nailed.

Analysis of Future Interior Noise Exposure within Residences Standard residential construction (stucco siding, STC-27 windows, door weather-stripping, exterior wall insulation, composition plywood roof) typically attenuates exterior noise levels by 25 dB. Table 4 shows that future interior traffic noise levels are predicted to range from 37 to 42 dB DNL at the first-floor building interiors proposed nearest to the roadways including noise attenuation provided by the proposed barriers. Due to reduced ground absorption of sound at elevated positions, exterior noise exposure is estimated to be approximately 2 dB higher at second-floor facades than at first-floor facades. Table 4 shows that the resulting noise levels at the second-floor interiors of the residences nearest to the noise sources are calculated to range from 44 to 48 dB DNL with standard residential construction.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Table 4
Predicted Future Traffic & Railroad Interior Noise Levels with Window Upgrades Source Lots1
Receiver
Location
Total
Offsets2
[dBA]
Predicted DNL w/
Std Construction3
[dBA]
Recommended
STC Rating4
[dBA]
Resulting
Interior DNL
[dBA]
Yosemite Ave 1, 70 1st-floor -6 40 27 40
2nd-floor 2 48 32 43
Yosemite Ave 2, 71 1st-floor -5 37 27 37
2nd-floor 2 44 27 44
Yosemite Ave 47, 67 1st-floor -6 37 27 37
2nd-floor 2 45 27 45
Yosemite Ave 48 - 66 1st-floor 0 42 27 42
2nd-floor 2 44 27 44
Brennan Ave 1 - 6 1st-floor -6 39 27 39
2nd-floor 2 47 32 42
Notes

1. Lots are shown on Figure 2.

2. Total offsets include offset shown in Table 2 (due to intervening buildings and elevated receiver position) and offset due to shielding provided by the proposed barrier(s).

3. A -25 dB offset was as applied for exterior-to-interior noise levels due to standard residential construction (STC 27 with 2 dB margin).

4. Recommended STC Rating is provided with a 2 dB margin.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc (2023)
Because future exterior traffic noise levels are predicted to exceed 45 dB DNL, upgrades to window and door assemblies would be required to ensure compliance with the City’s 45 dB DNL interior noise level standard. Table 4 summarizes the recommended STC rating glazing upgrades and the resulting interior sound level with those upgrades. The recommended window and door assembly upgrades is STC 32 for the upper floors, depending on the proximity of the residential facades to noise sources and the degree of shielding provided.

The specific recommendations for window and door assembly Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are illustrated on Figure 2. At the first-floor building facades, and at second-floor building facades further removed from roadway and railroad without an annotated STC rating recommendation on Figure 2, standard STC 27 window and door assemblies would provide the necessary exterior to interior noise reduction to achieve satisfaction with the City’s 45 dB DNL standard.

It should be noted that, while the STC ratings recommended include a 2 dB margin of safety. To increase the margin of safety, higher STC rated windows may be used and careful workmanship should be required during window installation to ensure the windows fit correctly within the frames with no gaps or acoustic leaks.

It should be noted that mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) will be provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve additional acoustical isolation.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Murphy Ranch Residential Development – Escalon, California

Conclusions
Without additional mitigation measures, future traffic and railroad noise levels are predicted to exceed the City of Escalon exterior and interior noise level standard at some locations within this development. In order to satisfy the City of Escalon 65 dB DNL exterior and 45 dB DNL interior noise level criteria, the following noise mitigation are recommended for the project:

1. Upgraded windows with STC ratings would be required on the second-floor as indicated in Table 4 and as shown on Figure 2 of this report. This applies only to second-floor windows on the lots highlighted in Figure 2, from which either Brennan Avenue or Yosemite Avenue would be visible.

2. A suitable form of forced-air mechanical ventilation or air-conditioning shall be provided so that windows can be kept closed as desired for additional acoustical isolation.

3. A minimum 6-foot-tall noise barrier should be constructed as shown on Figure 2. The noise barrier height shown is relative to the backyard elevation.

These conclusions are based on the measured traffic and railroad noise levels, and on noise reduction data for standard residential dwellings. Deviations from the project site plan shown in Figure 2 could cause future traffic noise levels to differ from those predicted in this analysis. In addition, BAC is not responsible for degradation in acoustic performance of the residential construction due to poor construction practices, failure to comply with applicable building code requirements, or for failure to adhere to the minimum building practices cited in this report.

This concludes BAC’s noise evaluation for the Murphy Ranch residential development project in Escalon, California. Please contact BAC at (530) 537-2328 or [email protected] with any questions regarding this assessment.

Appendix A
Acoustical Terminology
Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre-project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A-Weighting A frequency-response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approximate human response.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound. A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one-tenth of a Bell.

CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as the 24-hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 - 10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz.

IIC Impact Insulation Class (IIC): A single-number representation of a floor/ceiling partition’s impact generated noise insulation performance. The field-measured version of this number is the FIIC.

Ldn Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy-averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root-mean-square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

Masking The amount (or the process) by which the threshold of audibility is for one sound is raised by the presence of another (masking) sound.

Noise Unwanted sound.

Peak Noise The level corresponding to the highest (not RMS) sound pressure measured over a given period of time. This term is often confused with the “Maximum” level, which is the highest RMS level.

RT60 The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

STC Sound Transmission Class (STC): A single-number representation of a partition’s noise insulation performance. This number is based on laboratory-measured, 16-band (1/3- octave) transmission loss (TL) data of the subject partition. The field-measured version of this number is the FSTC.
r/1\\\\ BOLLARD
"'\J) J)) Acoustical Consultants

Legend
Appendix B A Site LT-1 Facing Northeast BC
Site LT-1 Facing Southeast
Site LT-2 Facing East A B C
Noise Survey Photographs
Murphy Ranch
Escalon, California
□
□
□

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM
1:00 AM High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM Leq (Average) 55 53 54 57 53 55
3:00 AM Lmax (Maximum) 76 68 72 81 74 78
4:00 AM L50 (Median) 54 52 53 50 50 50
5:00 AM L90 (Background) 50 46 48 45 43 44
6:00 AM
7:00 AM Computed DNL, dB 61
8:00 AM % Daytime Energy 55%
9:00 AM % Nighttime Energy 45%
10:00 AM
11:00 AM GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 37°47'52.65"N
1:00 PM 121° 0'48.17"W
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM 55 72 54 50
7:00 PM 54 70 53 47
8:00 PM 53 76 52 46
9:00 PM 53 68 52 47
10:00 PM 53 74 50 45
11:00 PM 57 81 50 43
Appendix C-1
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Thursday, August 3, 2023
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) I I I I Statistical Summary

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 60 90 47 42
1:00 AM 50 68 45 40 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 53 68 49 39 Leq (Average) 56 52 54 60 50 56
3:00 AM 55 71 52 45 Lmax (Maximum) 72 62 66 90 65 72
4:00 AM 55 65 54 48 L50 (Median) 56 52 53 57 45 52
5:00 AM 57 66 56 52 L90 (Background) 51 48 49 53 39 46
6:00 AM 59 81 57 53
7:00 AM 56 66 56 51 Computed DNL, dB 63
8:00 AM 55 67 54 50 % Daytime Energy 50%
9:00 AM 53 64 52 48 % Nighttime Energy 50%
10:00 AM 53 65 52 48
11:00 AM 53 65 52 48 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 53 62 52 49 37°47'52.65"N
1:00 PM 52 63 52 48 121° 0'48.17"W
2:00 PM 53 67 52 48
3:00 PM 53 62 53 50
4:00 PM 53 66 53 49
5:00 PM 54 68 53 49
6:00 PM 54 68 53 49
7:00 PM 55 69 54 49
8:00 PM 55 72 53 49
9:00 PM 56 68 55 51
10:00 PM 56 69 55 50
11:00 PM 55 69 52 46
Appendix C-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Friday, August 4, 2023
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 53 65 51 43
1:00 AM 51 71 47 39 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 50 71 47 39 Leq (Average) 57 52 54 60 50 55
3:00 AM 52 70 49 39 Lmax (Maximum) 77 64 69 87 65 71
4:00 AM 55 73 52 45 L50 (Median) 55 51 53 56 47 52
5:00 AM 56 67 55 50 L90 (Background) 49 47 48 51 39 45
6:00 AM 57 67 56 51
7:00 AM 57 76 55 49 Computed DNL, dB 62
8:00 AM 54 66 52 47 % Daytime Energy 54%
9:00 AM 53 66 53 49 % Nighttime Energy 46%
10:00 AM 53 74 52 48
11:00 AM 52 65 51 47 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 52 64 52 47 37°47'52.65"N
1:00 PM 52 66 51 48 121° 0'48.17"W
2:00 PM 52 64 51 47
3:00 PM 53 66 52 48
4:00 PM 53 68 53 48
5:00 PM 54 70 53 48
6:00 PM 55 67 54 49
7:00 PM 55 68 54 49
8:00 PM 55 72 54 49
9:00 PM 56 77 53 48
10:00 PM 56 68 55 49
11:00 PM 60 87 55 49
Appendix C-3
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Saturday, August 5, 2023
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 55 73 51 44
1:00 AM 54 73 48 40 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 50 63 46 39 Leq (Average) 55 52 54 62 50 56
3:00 AM 53 75 47 38 Lmax (Maximum) 73 64 68 88 63 71
4:00 AM 52 66 49 41 L50 (Median) 54 50 53 53 46 50
5:00 AM 55 66 53 48 L90 (Background) 50 45 48 48 38 43
6:00 AM 55 70 52 46
7:00 AM 52 64 51 45 Computed DNL, dB 62
8:00 AM 52 70 50 45 % Daytime Energy 51%
9:00 AM 53 69 52 48 % Nighttime Energy 49%
10:00 AM 53 68 52 48
11:00 AM 53 67 53 49 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 53 70 52 48 37°47'52.65"N
1:00 PM 54 65 53 50 121° 0'48.17"W
2:00 PM 54 73 53 49
3:00 PM 55 68 54 50
4:00 PM 54 67 53 49
5:00 PM 54 68 53 48
6:00 PM 54 69 53 49
7:00 PM 55 67 54 50
8:00 PM 55 68 54 50
9:00 PM 54 66 53 48
10:00 PM 54 65 53 47
11:00 PM 62 88 51 45
Appendix C-4
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Sunday, August 6, 2023
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 53 74 48 42
1:00 AM 52 68 46 39 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 55 78 49 43 Leq (Average) 58 51 55 60 52 57
3:00 AM 58 72 55 46 Lmax (Maximum) 65 64 65 78 68 72
4:00 AM 58 70 57 52 L50 (Median) 57 49 53 59 46 53
5:00 AM 60 70 59 54 L90 (Background) 53 44 48 54 39 47
6:00 AM 59 69 58 54
7:00 AM 58 65 57 53 Computed DNL, dB 63
8:00 AM 54 64 53 48 % Daytime Energy 51%
9:00 AM 51 65 49 44 % Nighttime Energy 49%
10:00 AM
11:00 AM GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 37°47'52.65"N
1:00 PM 121° 0'48.17"W
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Appendix C-5
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Monday, August 7, 2023
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM
1:00 AM High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM Leq (Average) 63 58 62 68 58 66
3:00 AM Lmax (Maximum) 88 73 82 98 77 87
4:00 AM L50 (Median) 60 56 58 52 51 52
5:00 AM L90 (Background) 55 48 51 45 44 44
6:00 AM
7:00 AM Computed DNL, dB 72
8:00 AM % Daytime Energy 40%
9:00 AM % Nighttime Energy 60%
10:00 AM
11:00 AM GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 37°47'53.64"N
1:00 PM 121° 0'53.42"W
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM 63 85 60 55
6:00 PM 63 88 60 52
7:00 PM 63 88 58 50
8:00 PM 60 76 57 48
9:00 PM 58 73 56 48
10:00 PM 58 77 52 45
11:00 PM 68 98 51 44
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Appendix C-6
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Thursday, August 3, 2023

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 73 104 46 40
1:00 AM 53 70 44 39 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 56 76 49 39 Leq (Average) 63 60 62 73 53 65
3:00 AM 58 73 54 45 Lmax (Maximum) 82 72 78 104 70 79
4:00 AM 61 74 58 49 L50 (Median) 62 58 60 61 44 53
5:00 AM 62 80 60 53 L90 (Background) 55 51 53 55 39 46
6:00 AM 64 87 61 55
7:00 AM 63 76 62 55 Computed DNL, dB 71
8:00 AM 62 79 61 53 % Daytime Energy 43%
9:00 AM 63 79 61 53 % Nighttime Energy 57%
10:00 AM 61 73 59 51
11:00 AM 62 79 60 53 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 61 79 60 53 37°47'53.64"N
1:00 PM 61 78 59 53 121° 0'53.42"W
2:00 PM 62 81 60 53
3:00 PM 61 76 60 55
4:00 PM 62 80 60 55
5:00 PM 62 79 60 54
6:00 PM 61 77 60 52
7:00 PM 60 72 59 52
8:00 PM 60 76 58 51
9:00 PM 61 82 58 52
10:00 PM 59 74 56 48
11:00 PM 57 74 53 46
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Appendix C-7
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Friday, August 4, 2023

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 56 71 52 44
1:00 AM 54 71 48 41 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 54 74 46 41 Leq (Average) 63 60 61 69 54 62
3:00 AM 54 72 47 39 Lmax (Maximum) 90 72 80 102 71 76
4:00 AM 57 72 52 44 L50 (Median) 60 58 59 58 46 52
5:00 AM 60 76 56 48 L90 (Background) 53 48 51 49 39 45
6:00 AM 60 74 58 49
7:00 AM 62 86 60 48 Computed DNL, dB 68
8:00 AM 61 74 59 50 % Daytime Energy 61%
9:00 AM 61 78 60 52 % Nighttime Energy 39%
10:00 AM 62 87 59 52
11:00 AM 61 79 59 53 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 61 80 59 51 37°47'53.64"N
1:00 PM 62 89 58 51 121° 0'53.42"W
2:00 PM 60 74 58 51
3:00 PM 60 72 59 51
4:00 PM 61 81 59 51
5:00 PM 62 84 59 49
6:00 PM 61 78 59 51
7:00 PM 60 75 59 50
8:00 PM 60 78 58 50
9:00 PM 63 90 58 49
10:00 PM 59 75 57 49
11:00 PM 69 102 56 48
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Appendix C-8
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Saturday, August 5, 2023

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 57 77 52 44
1:00 AM 57 83 48 42 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 53 69 46 42 Leq (Average) 65 59 61 61 53 58
3:00 AM 54 70 47 42 Lmax (Maximum) 95 71 79 88 69 75
4:00 AM 55 73 49 42 L50 (Median) 60 56 59 57 46 51
5:00 AM 57 71 53 46 L90 (Background) 54 47 51 51 42 45
6:00 AM 58 74 54 47
7:00 AM 59 72 56 47 Computed DNL, dB 65
8:00 AM 60 75 58 47 % Daytime Energy 79%
9:00 AM 61 83 59 51 % Nighttime Energy 21%
10:00 AM 60 75 59 52
11:00 AM 61 77 60 54 GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 61 80 59 53 37°47'53.64"N
1:00 PM 62 83 60 54 121° 0'53.42"W
2:00 PM 61 75 59 52
3:00 PM 61 71 60 53
4:00 PM 61 81 60 53
5:00 PM 60 77 59 50
6:00 PM 65 95 59 51
7:00 PM 61 81 59 52
8:00 PM 61 83 59 52
9:00 PM 59 73 58 50
10:00 PM 59 74 57 51
11:00 PM 61 88 53 50
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Appendix C-9
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Sunday, August 6, 2023

I I I I

I I I I

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 55 75 51 49
1:00 AM 57 81 51 49 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 57 72 52 49 Leq (Average) 63 60 62 64 55 61
3:00 AM 61 78 57 50 Lmax (Maximum) 76 74 75 92 72 78
4:00 AM 64 92 60 53 L50 (Median) 61 58 60 63 51 56
5:00 AM 63 76 63 57 L90 (Background) 55 48 51 57 49 52
6:00 AM 63 75 62 57
7:00 AM 63 76 61 55 Computed DNL, dB 68
8:00 AM 62 74 60 51 % Daytime Energy 65%
9:00 AM 60 75 58 48 % Nighttime Energy 35%
10:00 AM
11:00 AM GPS Coordinates
12:00 PM 37°47'53.64"N
1:00 PM 121° 0'53.42"W
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Appendix C-10
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Monday, August 7, 2023

I I I I

I I I I

61 dB
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Thursday, August 3, 2023
Appendix D-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) ...
-----.A -----/
-- /
----- - ~
- - - -

63 dB
Appendix D-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Friday, August 4, 2023
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) siren
train horn
- - - -

62 dB
Appendix D-3
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Saturday, August 5, 2023
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) car
- - - -

62 dB
Appendix D-4
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Sunday, August 6, 2023
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) siren
.....__ ..... ~--
- - - -

63 dB
Appendix D-5
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-1
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Monday, August 7, 2023
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
- Average (Leq)- Maximum (Lmax)- Median (L50)- Background (L90)

72 dB
Appendix D-6
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Thursday, August 3, 2023
Computed DNL =
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
- Average (Leq)- Maximum (Lmax)- Median (L50)- Background (L90)

71 dB
Appendix D-7
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Friday, August 4, 2023
Computed DNL =
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) train horn
siren
- - - -

68 dB
Appendix D-8
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Saturday, August 5, 2023
Computed DNL =
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) car
- - - -

65 dB
Appendix D-9
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Sunday, August 6, 2023
Computed DNL =
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
- Average (Leq)- Maximum (Lmax)- Median (L50)- Background (L90)

68 dB
Appendix D-10
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, LT-2
Murphy Ranch - Escalon, California
Monday, August 7, 2023
Computed DNL =
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA Time of Day
- Average (Leq)- Maximum (Lmax)- Median (L50)- Background (L90)

APPENDIX G
TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
Technical Memorandum
Date: Revised April 15, 2025
To: John Pronoitis - Florsheim Homes
From: Carly Hoyt and Ron Milam, AICP, PTP - Fehr & Peers Subject: Murphy Ranch Transportation Impact Analysis
RS23-4281
This memorandum presents the methodologies, inputs, and results of the Murphy Ranch Transportation Impact Analysis completed to comply with the City of Escalon requirements associated with entitlement review and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For CEQA purposes, the study focuses on two impact topics.
• Vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
• Queueing at Caltrans intersections.

Other potential CEQA topics identified in the CEQA Appendix G checklist are not included as this study is intended to be a supplement to the CEQA analysis completed by others.

For entitlement review, the impact analysis included two additional topics. • Intersection and roadway operations.
• Collision history review.

The intersection and roadway segment operations analysis are included to describe how the addition of project traffic will affect the existing driver experience as described in greater detail later in this memorandum. Please note that this study supersedes previous analysis that was generally prepared to help determine the developer’s fair share contribution for future improvements at the SR 120/Brennan Avenue intersection. Based on comments received from the public and Caltrans, the study has been expanded and updated and this new study replaces the previous version in all respects.

FEHR,f PEERS

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
Project Description
The proposed development consists of 73 detached single family dwelling units, including 7 affordable units and 65 market rate units. The proposed project site is located in Unincorporated San Joaquin County; however, it would be annexed into the City of Escalon with the proposed project. The project site is located southeast of the SR 120/Brennan Avenue intersection and is surrounded by agricultural land uses to the north and west and single-family residential to the south and east. The project is consistent with the City of Escalon General Plan land use designation and the goals and policies identified in the Land Use Element and Urban Boundary Element.

Two existing local roads, Celivo Way and Riesling Way, will be extended to provide access to the proposed project. Both roads currently connect to California Street, which provides access to Brennan Avenue and ultimately SR 120 to the west, and McHenry Avenue/Escalon-Bellota Road to the east. No direct access to Brennan Avenue or SR 120 is proposed.

VMT Impact Assessment
This section describes the regulatory basis for VMT impact analysis, thresholds of significance used for the VMT analysis, the VMT assessment approach, and the results of the VMT assessment for the proposed project.

Senate Bill 743
Senate Bill (SB 743) was signed into law in 2013 and changed the focus of transportation impact analysis for CEQA purposes. Instead of analyzing the impact of land use projects on drivers using metrics like delay and level of service (LOS), transportation impacts are now based on the effects of driving as measured using VMT. The specific changes are codified in Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that generally, vehicle miles traveled is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. And, according the 15064.2(a), “Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) (regarding roadway capacity), a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.”. The provisions of 15064.3 have applied statewide since July 1, 2020.

While the CEQA Guidelines do not contain detailed guidance for individual land uses, Section 15064.3(b)(1) recommends, “Projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.”

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
VMT Thresholds of Significance
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b)(1) allows lead agencies the discretion to select their own thresholds and allow for differences in thresholds based on context. The City of Escalon has not adopted VMT impact thresholds for general use so a project-specific threshold was developed based on direction from City staff.

The City of Escalon has determined that a significant impact would occur if the proposed projects’ homebased VMT per capita would exceed the existing Citywide average home-based VMT per capita.

Key factors in determining this threshold included a review of the General Plan expectations for VMT reduction, and the project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element, Urban Boundary Element, and Housing Element. The General Plan Circulation Element does not include explicit targets or policies for reducing VMT but does generally support VMT reduction.

Additionally, the Urban Boundary Element describes the strategic growth plan for the City and includes 10- year growth rings (boundaries) starting with the year 2015, 2025 (Sphere of Influence), 2035, and the outer boundary which is the Planning Area. The Urban Boundary Element states that it is “an important element because it limits leap-frog development and provides for an orderly transition from rural to urban land uses.”
Key objectives of the Element include minimizing urban sprawl and leap-frog development and designating growth areas that can be served by logical infrastructure extensions. Minimizing urban sprawl and leapfrogging development is consistent with the overarching goal of SB 743 which is to reduce vehicle miles traveled (and ultimately greenhouse gas emissions) by encouraging infill development and focusing new development near existing services. The City’s growth boundary was strategically designed to allow the City to increase its housing supply (which is consistent with multiple state goals and policies) while minimizing impacts on city services and ensuring development is contiguous with the existing city boundary, while also protecting and preserving the existing local community. Although development of the urban growth boundary predates VMT and SB 743, the concept of the growth boundary is consistent with the overarching goal of SB 743 and statewide goals for increasing the housing supply as it allows for the addition of housing units but ensures those units are strategically placed to minimize negative impacts to the environment, city services, and the local community.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
VMT Assessment Approach
Fehr & Peers VMT+ tool was used to determine the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita and estimate project home-based VMT per capita. VMT+ utilizes a custom data set from StreetLight Data, which is based on anonymized locational records, passively collected from smart phones, and it provides homebased VMT per capita and home-based VMT per worker in California, down to the census block group (BG). Data from 2022 was used for this analysis.

The VMT+ VMT per capita (or resident) data includes all homebased automobile vehicle trips which are traced back to the residence of the trip-maker (see Image 1); non-home based trips (i.e. from the grocery store to the coffee shop) and commercial vehicle trips (trucks) are excluded.

There are six BGs within the City of Escalon, however, all six overlap between the City of Escalon and San Joaquin County boundary. Based on 2022 VMT+ data, Unincorporated San
Joaquin County has a lower average VMT per capita than the City of Escalon. Because the BGs overlap between the City and County boundary, it is possible that homes located in the County generate lower home-based VMT per capita than those in the City, particularly because the homes in the County in this area are primarily rural or agricultural in nature and likely have different trip making characteristics than traditional single-family homes in a more suburban setting. County homes in these BGs may be skewing (downward) the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita. However, due to limitations in the data set and BG boundaries, these homes are included nonetheless and may be resulting in a lower Citywide average home-based VMT per capita than would be reported if homes exclusively within the City of Escalon were being used for the analysis. Table 1 displays the average home-based VMT per capita for all six BGs, which was used to develop the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita.

Table 1 – Average Citywide Home-Based VMT Per Capita
Census Block Group Home-Based VMT Per Capita
060770049031 30.2
060770049032 26.5
060770049041 29.0
060770049042 27.1
060770049043 23.3
Image 1: Home-Based VMT Graphic
Source: Fehr & Peers
Home-Based VMT per resident
(HBX)

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
060770049044 22.4
Citywide Average 26.4
Notes:

Home-based VMT per capita derived from 2022 Streetlight Data.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
As displayed, the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita is 26.4.

The average home-based VMT per capita for BG 060770049032, the BG the proposed project is in, was used to evaluate project VMT. The following criteria were used to determine if the existing BG was appropriate to use to estimate project home-based VMT per capita:
1) Land use characteristics: Almost all homes located in the BG are single-family homes located in the residential neighborhoods south of SR 120. These homes are similar in size and development type when compared to the proposed project (i.e. a BG with primarily high-density multi-family development would not be appropriate to use to estimate VMT for a low-density single-family home development).
2) Location of BG compared to location of the proposed project: Given that the proposed project is located within the BG, it can be concluded that there are no geographical or circulation differences that would result in a significantly different VMT per capita (i.e., a BG in a different part of the city with a very different circulation network and access locations may not be as reasonable of a proxy). 3) Age of housing: The age of housing stock can impact the demographics (and trip making characteristics) of a community. The subdivision directly south of the proposed project is one of the newest residential developments in the City of Escalon and therefore, is likely the most representative in terms of household demographics for the proposed project.

For these reasons, the existing BG was determined to be generally representative of the proposed project and it is anticipated that future residents of the proposed project would have similar trip making characteristics as the existing residents and produce similar home-based VMT per capita. The one caveat to this is that the project includes seven affordable units which typically generate fewer trips and ultimately less VMT when compared to market rate units.1. Daily trip generation rates documented in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) for single-family detached homes and affordable housing units were used to evaluate if and how much of a discount should be applied to the existing BG’s home-based VMT per capita to account for the affordable units. Based on the ITE trip 1 Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, 2021) and Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory), California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (December 2018).

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
generation rates, affordable units are estimated to generate approximately 49 percent less trips than typical single-family homes on a daily basis.

Incorporating this discount for the affordable units results in an average project home-based VMT per capita of 25.2, which is lower than the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita of 26.4. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant transportation impact.

Queuing Impacts
Fehr & Peers completed a queuing impact analysis to determine how the addition of project traffic during peak hours would impact queueing at the State Route (SR) 120/Brennan Avenue and SR 120/Walnut Avenue intersections. This section describes the regulatory basis for the queueing impact analysis, including the thresholds of significance plus the methodologies, inputs, and results.

Due to their close proximity to the SR 120 intersections listed above, queueing is also analyzed for the intersections of Brennan Avenue/California Street and Walnut Avenue/California Street; however, these queues are presented for informational purposes only. Caltrans requests queueing impact analysis related to the state highway system for CEQA review purposes while the City of Escalon does not. More details are provided in the regulatory framework below.

Regulatory Framework
Caltrans is responsible for planning, designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining the State Highway System (SHS). Any improvements or modifications to the SHS at the study intersections would need to be approved by Caltrans. To facilitate Caltrans review, and where necessary, their approval, the following technical guidance applies.

VMT-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (TISG)
On May 20, 2020, the VMT-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (“TISG”) was adopted by Caltrans (2020). The TISG provides guidance on how Caltrans will review land use projects, with focus on VMT analysis and supporting state land use goals, state planning priorities, and GHG emission reduction goals; as well as identifying land use projects’ possible transportation impacts to the State Highway System and potential non-capacity increasing mitigation measures. The TISG indicates that Caltrans intends to “transition away from requesting LOS or other vehicle operations analyses of land use projects,” instead placing the focus on VMT and safety.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
Local Development Review (LDR) Safety Review Practitioner’s Guidance The Caltrans Safety Impact Guidance provides methods for how Caltrans and lead agencies can review the potential safety impacts of land use development projects affecting the state highway system. Caltrans acknowledges that the guidance may also be used to evaluate local roadways at the discretion of the lead agency. As explained in the document, “This Guidance prioritizes vulnerable road users (VRU)1 and underserved communities; enhances safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and vehicular modes; and applies both reactive and systemic perspectives. This Guidance supports the shift away from using Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service (LOS) as a metric of analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with implementing Senate Bill 743, and complements the “Vehicle Miles TraveledFocused Transportation Impact Study Guide” (TISG) (dated May 20, 2020).” Caltrans’ Transportation Concept Report (TCR) for SR 120 classifies SR 120 west of Brennan Avenue as a two-lane expressway and classifies SR 120 east of Brennan Avenue as a two-lane conventional highway. The LDR Guidance recommends focusing on speed management and control, access management (driveways, intersections, and roundabouts and/or acceleration/deceleration lanes), accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians, and conflict avoidance.

Queuing Thresholds of Significance
Based on guidance in the Caltrans documents described above and a project specific discussion with Caltrans District 10 staff on January 28, 2025, the proposed project would result in a significant impact if it would:
• Cause the 95th percentile queue length on the westbound approach at SR 120/Brennan Avenue to spill back to SR 120/Walnut Avenue during either the AM or PM peak hour. • Cause the 95th percentile queue length in the westbound left turn pocket at SR 120/Walnut Avenue to extend beyond the available storage during either the AM or PM peak hour.

Queuing Impact Analysis Approach
Vehicle queueing is analyzed using Synchro’s SimTraffic version 12 microsimulation module, which applies the procedures and methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022). SimTraffic considers traffic volumes, lane configurations, signal timings, interactions between adjacent intersections, turn lane queues, upstream/downstream bottlenecks, and other parameters. SimTraffic is capable of analyzing intersection operations under a wide range of conditions including when operating conditions are near capacity, turn lane storage exceedance is common, and/or intersections are spaced closely together. Consistent with District 10 requirements, an average of 10 runs was used and the precise (non-rounded) 95th percentile queue is reported. This queue represents the length of queued traffic for which there is a 5% or less chance that the actual queue would be greater.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
The following specific inputs are used in the analysis. • Traffic volumes based on count data collected and described in “Data Collection” • Lane configurations based on field observations and aerial imagery. • Global peak hour factor of 0.89 for AM and 0.96 for PM based on traffic count data. • Heavy vehicle percentages by movement based on traffic count data and heavy vehicle restrictions on local roads2.
• Bicycle and pedestrian volumes based on count data.
• Adjusted turning movement speed and headway factor for the northbound approach to calibrate SimTraffic to field observations.

The following intersections were selected for the vehicle queueing analysis based on the comment letter provided by Caltrans on December 17, 2024.
1) SR 120/Brennan Avenue
2) Brennan Avenue/California Street
3) California Street/Walnut Avenue
4) SR 120/Walnut Avenue
Data Collection
A combination of count data was used to determine intersection turning movement volumes at the study intersections. Caltrans provided count data collected December 3rd through 5th, 2024 from 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM at the intersection of SR 120/Brennan Avenue. Traffic count data at the remaining three intersections was collected on March 6, 2025 during the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (3:30 PM to 5:30 PM). Field observations were also conducted to gather necessary data (queueing and delay) to calibrate the microsimulation model to match existing conditions and to conduct a reasonableness check on the volumes documented in the December count data. Traffic count data is typically collected during weekday AM and PM peak periods because these periods are when traffic volumes tend to consistently be the highest. When possible, roadways are designed to balance accommodating traffic volumes during peak hour conditions based on the jurisdictions level of service performance target without resulting in overdesigned roadways during non-peak hours.

SimTraffic requires volume balancing and global peak hour volumes and a global peak hour factor be used for the analysis. The global peak hour at the four intersections during the AM peak period is 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM and the global peak hour during the PM peak period is 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. It is noted that local 2 Heavy vehicles are prohibited on Walnut Avenue and a heavy vehicle percentage of 0 was used for this local road.

Signage at SR 120/Brennan Avenue indicates heavy vehicles are also prohibited on Brennan Avenue; however, due to the existing agriculture on the west side of Brennan Avenue, heavy vehicle percentages based on count data was used.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
roads experienced greater fluctuation in volumes throughout the hour (resulting in a lower peak hour factor) but the peak hour factor at the SR 120 intersections is used due to overall traffic volumes on the state highway. Turning movement count data is displayed in Attachment 1.

Project Trip Generation and Distribution
Project trips were estimated using trip rates published in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021). Table 2 displays the estimated number of daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour vehicle trips for the proposed project.

Table 2 – Project Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Quantity
(DU) Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single Family (210) 66 688 13 38 51 42 25 67
Affordable Housing (223) 7 34 1 3 4 2 1 3
Total 73 722 14 41 55 44 26 70
Notes:

Trip generation estimated using trip rates published in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021). The fitted curve equation was used to estimate single-family home trips and the average rate was used to estimate affordable units.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
As displayed, the proposed project is estimated to generate 722 daily, 55 AM peak hour, and 70 PM peak hour trips.

Project trips were distributed based on existing travel patterns and output from the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) 2016 base year travel demand model (TDM). Traffic count data collected at the study intersections was used to determine how trips from the existing single-family homes adjacent to the project site are distributed through study intersections. In addition to evaluating existing data, the proposed project was added to the base year TDM for the sole purpose of evaluating general distribution on SR 120 and throughout Escalon. The TDM model produced similar distribution to existing travel patterns based on 2024/2025 count data. Project trip distribution is displayed in Figures 1 and 2.

Note, all trips to/from the west were assigned to the SR 120/Brennan Avenue intersection while most trips to the east were assigned to California Street, 1st Street or SR 120 by way of California Street to Walnut Avenue. This is primarily because travel time and distance influence a driver’s chosen path of travel and heading west to Brennan Avenue to then go east on SR 120 is not only a longer distance, but would increase travel time as the existing delay for the northbound turning movement at the SR 120/Brennan Avenue

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
intersection is high, as described in greater detail in the operations analysis results section of this memorandum.

Analysis Scenarios
The queueing analysis was completed for the following scenarios:
1) Existing Conditions – represents conditions in 2025. 2) Existing Plus Proposed Project Conditions – analyzes the study intersections with the addition of project trips to existing conditions.

Under cumulative conditions, some background traffic growth will occur in addition to the traffic generated by the proposed project. Review of California Department of Finance reports E-4 and P-2A indicate San Joaquin County has experienced an annual average growth rate increase of .31% based on historic growth between 2020 and 2024 and is estimated to have an annual average growth rate increase of 1.09% between 2025 and 2045. On January 28, 2025 during on a project specific discussion with Caltrans District 10 staff (as well as in supplemental email correspondence with Caltrans between January and April 2025), Caltrans noted they have prepared a Conceptual Report to identify improvements necessary to accommodate future levels of traffic growth based on their design, operational, and safety standards. At the time of this report, the Conceptual Report has not yet been publicly released. During this conversation with Caltrans staff, they noted the timing of intersection improvements is unknown but they anticipate it will likely be a minimum of five years (2030+) before major physical improvements (such as installation of a signal, roundabout, turn pockets, etc.) to the intersection are made. They also noted the project would be fully funded by Caltrans.

Although there is no official timeline for project improvements at this time, Caltrans has confirmed improvements will occur prior to the 2045 cumulative year horizon year for the proposed project. Therefore, no cumulative impact related to queuing is expected.

Pending entitlement and building permit approval, the proposed project is anticipated to begin construction near the end of 2026/early 2027 and be completed within one to three years. For this reason, the intent of this queueing analysis is to identify how the project will impact the intersection prior to the improvements made by Caltrans and focuses on an existing and existing plus project queueing analysis.

Queuing Impact Assessment Results
Table 3 displays existing and existing plus project AM and PM peak hour 95th percentile queue lengths for key turning movements at the study intersections. Consistent with Caltrans District 10 preferences, nonrounded 95th percentile queues are reports. Technical calculations are provided in Attachment 2. Although only queuing on the westbound approach at SR 120/Brennan Avenue and SR 120/Walnut Avenue are used

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
for the CEQA impact analysis, queuing on all approaches and on local roads is provided for informational purposes.

Table 3 – 95th Percentile Queues1 – Existing and Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Turning Movement Available
Storage (feet)
Peak
Hour Existing Existing Plus Project

1. SR 120/ Brennan Ave
NB L/T/R 625
AM 151 215
PM 79 91

SB L/T/R N/A
AM 40 40
PM 50 57

EB L/T/R N/A
AM 24 40
PM 56 59
WB L/T/R 2,7002 AM 96 48
PM 42 98

2. Brennan Ave/ California St
SB L/T/R 65
AM 6 9
PM 10 13

WB L/T/R N/A
AM 47 50
PM 35 41

3. California St/ Walnut Ave

NB L/T/R N/A
AM 3 3
PM 8 14

SB L/T/R N/A
AM 3 4
PM 4 5

EB L/T/R N/A
AM 48 52
PM 48 49

WB L/T/R N/A
AM 28 31
PM 26 27

4. SR 120/ Walnut Ave

NB L/T/R N/A
AM 105 137
PM 56 68
WBL 340
AM 37 36
PM 48 56
Notes:
195th percentile queue is based on out from SimTraffic microsimulation model. 2Available storage based on Caltrans impact criteria that a significant impact would occur if queue spills back to adjacent intersection of SR 120/Walnut Ave.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
As shown, the 95th percentile queue would not exceed the available storage under existing or existing plus project conditions. The longest queues are experienced on the northbound approaches at SR 120/Brennan Avenue and SR 120/Walnut Avenue during the AM peak hour. With the addition of project trips, the 95th percentile queue on the northbound approach at SR 120/Brennan Avenue would increase from approximately six vehicles to eight to nine vehicles. At SR 120/Walnut Avenue, the 95th percentile queue on the northbound approach would increase from approximately four to five vehicles to five to six vehicles.

The proposed project would not cause the 95th percentile queue for the westbound approach at SR 120/Brennan Avenue to spill back to SR 120/Walnut Avenue nor would it cause the 95th percentile queue for westbound left turn pocket at SR 120/Walnut Avenue to exceed the available storage. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant queuing impact.

Intersection Operations Analysis
The intersection operations analysis provides information required by the City of Escalon to measure how the addition of project traffic to existing conditions will affect driving. The analysis relies on changes in delay to drivers to determine the level of service (LOS) for peak hour traffic operations. Automobile LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow from the perspective of drivers and does not provide information about the experience of those walking or bicycling through the study intersections.

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022) defines six levels of service from LOS A representing the least delay to LOS F representing the most congested traffic conditions. These grades represent the perspective of drivers and are an indication of the comfort and convenience associated with driving, as well as speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, and freedom to maneuver.

For intersection LOS at unsignalized side-street stop-controlled intersections, this study reports the average control delay for the lane group or movement with the greatest delay, and for the intersection as a whole.

Table 4 presents the control delay range for each LOS for unsignalized intersections.

Table 4 – Levels of Service Definitions - Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay at Stop Controlled Intersections
A ≤ 10
B >10 to 15
C >15 to 25
D >25 to 35

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
E >35 to 50
F >50
Notes:

Average control delay presented in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are rounded to the nearest second and evaluated for LOS based on the above thresholds (i.e., 10 seconds per vehicle = LOS A) Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022.

Intersection Operations Analysis Results
Intersection operations were analyzed using the methodologies previously described. For existing plus project conditions, project trips were added to existing traffic counts based on the trip generation and distribution previously described. Figure 3 and 4 display the peak hour turning movements for existing and existing plus project conditions.

Table 5 displays the AM and PM peak hour intersection operations at the study intersections under both analysis scenarios. The precise, non-rounded delay is presented consistent with Caltrans District 10 preferences. The City of Escalon’s General Plan indicates a performance target of LOS D for local city intersections. Caltrans also has performance target of LOS D for Caltrans intersections. Technical calculations are provided in Attachment 2.

Table 5 – Intersection Operations Analysis
Intersection Control
Type
Peak
Hour
Existing Existing Plus Project
Delay2 LOS Delay2 LOS

1. SR 120/ Brennan Ave SSSC1 AM 6.0 (51.1) A (F) 8.5 (77.2) A (F) PM 4.6 (56.0) A (F) 5.9 (67.2) A (F)

2. Brennan Ave/ California St SSSC1 AM 1.1 (4.7) A (A) 1.3 (4.4) A (A) PM 1.1 (3.9) A (A) 1.3 (5.1) A (A)

3. California St/ Walnut Ave SSSC1 AM 1.9 (5.0) A (A) 2.3 (5.3) A (A) PM 1.7 (5.7) A (A) 2.0 (5.2) A (A)

4. SR 120/ Walnut Ave SSSC1 AM 3.9 (35.0) A (D) 4.3 (35.2) A (D) PM 3.9 (32.2) A (D) 4.2 (33.8) A (D)
Notes:

Bold indicates deficient operations.
1SSSC = side-street stop controlled intersection 2The overall average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle and (worst-case movement).

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024
As displayed, SR 120/Brennan Avenue operates deficiently at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours without and with the addition of project trips. Under existing conditions, the northbound approach experiences the highest delay with an average delay of approximately 51 seconds during the AM peak hour

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
and 56 seconds during the PM peak hour. This is consistent with field observations where observed delay for the northbound approach was as low as three seconds to as high as two minutes and fifteen seconds.

A peak hour signal warrant analysis (consistent with the methodologies in the California MUTCD 2014 Edition) was conducted to determine if existing volumes satisfy the warrant for installation of a traffic signal.

It is noted that the peak hour warrant is one of nine signal warrants in the MUTCD to assist traffic engineers in determining whether installation of a traffic signal is justified. Satisfaction of a signal warrant does not necessarily mean a traffic signal is the most appropriate control option (and a roundabout can still be considered), it simply indicates volumes on the side-street are high enough during the peak hour to consider a traffic signal or alternative control option. Under existing conditions, volumes during the AM peak hour satisfy the warrant for installation of a traffic signal while volumes during the PM peak hour do not. Technical calculations are provided in Attachment 2.

The proposed project is estimated to add a total of 24 trips to the intersection during the AM peak hour, 18 of which would be outbound trips on the northbound approach; a total of 26 trips are estimated to be added during the PM peak hour, seven of which would be outbound trips on the northbound approach. As a result, the project would increase delay on the approach by approximately 26 seconds during the AM peak hour and 11 seconds during the PM peak hour.

The proposed project would result in minimal changes to delay at the other study intersections and all other intersections would operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. It is noted that delay for the northbound approach at SR 120/Walnut Avenue is at the LOS D/E threshold of 35 seconds during the AM peak hour and near this threshold during the PM peak hour. This delay is experienced by motorists making the northbound left turn onto SR 120; the northbound right turn delay would increase from approximately 15 to 18 seconds with the addition of project trips. The proposed project would not add any trips to the northbound left turn movement at this intersection and as a result, this delay does not change with the addition of project trips.

Although SR 120/Brennan Avenue operates at LOS F under existing conditions and would continue to operate at LOS F with the addition of project trips, the project is considered consistent with the General Plan given the General Plan policy focuses on local intersections and roadways and SR 120/Brennan Avenue is a Caltrans intersection. As previously mentioned, Caltrans has their own internal process for addressing deficiencies and has indicated that they have prepared a Conceptual Report that evaluated various lane configurations and control options for this intersection. The Conceptual Report is currently being reviewed internally by Caltrans staff and has not yet been released for public review. Because the Conceptual Report is evaluating near-term and ultimate improvements at the intersection (including lane configuration changes and/or control changes such as a traffic signal or roundabout), these types of improvements are not included in this memorandum. However, due to public concerns regarding a history of collisions at this

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
intersection, additional safety related improvements are included for consideration and are discussed in the “Collision History Review” section of this memo.

Roadway Segment Analysis
Fehr & Peers completed a roadway segment analysis to evaluate how the proposed project would impact daily traffic on California Street and Brennan Avenue. The City of Escalon Police Department collected speed and volume data on California Street between Brennan Avenue and Riesling Road between December 6 and December 20, 2024. Data is provided in Attachment 3.

This data, along with peak hour data collected at the California Street/Walnut Avenue intersection and Brennan Avenue/California Street intersection, was used to estimate ADT on California Street between Riesling Road and Walnut Avenue and Brennan Avenue between SR 120 and California Street 3. Project trips were added to existing ADT to estimate existing plus project ADT. Table 6 displays both existing and existing plus project ADT on the roadway segments.

Table 6 – Roadway Segment Analysis
Roadway Segment Existing ADT Existing Plus
Project ADT

1. California Street between Brennan Avenue and Riesling Road 594 955

2. California Street between Riesling Road and Walnut Avenue 750 1,111

3. Brennan Avenue between SR 120 and California Street 1,200 1,561 Notes: Existing ADT on segment 1 was provided by City of Escalon Police Department. Existing ADT on segment 2 and 3 was estimated by applying a k-factor of .10 to existing peak hour volumes.

Fehr & Peers, 2025
As displayed, with the addition of project trips, volumes on California Street would increase to between approximately 1,000 to 1,100 ADT and volumes on Brennan Avenue would increase to approximately 1,600 ADT. The City of Escalon General Plan includes a goal of maintaining a roadway LOS of D or better on local streets, Minor Collectors, Collector and Arterial Streets but does not include specific LOS D thresholds. Based on the Highway Capacity Manual’s generalized daily service volume thresholds for two-lane urban streets, California Street and Brennan Avenue would operate at LOS D or better with the addition of project trips.

Additionally, the City of Escalon Municipal Code Section 16.02.020.C. requires access routes from residential subdivisions to collector or arterial streets be designed to encourage vehicle speeds of less than 25 miles per hour and traffic volumes of less than 4,000 ADT, or as otherwise provided for in the circulation element of the general plan or in the city standards. While this applies to local roads and California Street is 3 A k-factor of .10 was used to estimate ADT.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
designated as a collector and Brennan Avenue is designated as an arterial (which are both intended to carry higher volumes than local access roads), neither California Street nor Brennan Avenue would exceed 4,000 ADT with the addition of project trips.

Collision History Review
Fehr & Peers reviewed the most recent five-years of available collision data at SR 120/Brennan Avenue to determine what, if any, collision patterns exist under existing conditions. California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) data between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2024 was used for this collision history review. During the study time period, there were 15 reported collisions at the intersection. Table 7 displays collisions by severity.

Table 7 – Collisions by Severity (1/1/2020 – 12/31/2024) Intersection Total Crashes Fatal Severe Injury Injury (Other Visible)
Property Damage
Only
SR 120/ Brennan
Avenue 15 1 5 6 3
Notes: Collision data obtained from SWITRS
Fehr & Peers, 2025
As shown, one fatal, five “severe” injury, six “other visible” injury, and three property damage only (PDO) collisions occurred during the study time period. The following collision types are most prevalent:
• Broadside: 53% (8 collisions)
• Rear End: 20% (3 collisions)
• Sideswipe: 13% (2 collisions)
Five of the six KSI collisions are broadside collisions which occurred as a result of motorists on Brennan Avenue failing to yield to oncoming traffic on SR 120 (note, one of these collisions also included driving under the influence). The sixth KSI collision is categorized as “other” but was caused by a motorist heading north on Brennan Avenue failing to yield to oncoming traffic on SR 120. Review of the police report4 for this collision indicates a motorist “went into a tree or off the road” so although this collision did not result in a broadside collision, the collision was caused by the same action – drivers on Brennan Avenue failing to yield to oncoming traffic on SR 120. Five of these six collisions were caused by motorists heading north on Brennan Avenue either proceeding straight or turning left onto SR 120. One collision was caused by motorists heading south on Brennan Avenue.
4 https://weescalon.com/2024/12/02/escalon-police-departments-weekly-activity-log-11-25-2024-11-30-2024/

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
All three rear end collisions were attributed to unsafe speeds on SR 120. Sideswipe collisions were attributed to drivers passing other vehicles or crossing into opposing lanes, which can also often be correlated with unsafe speeds.

There are no clear time of day or weather-related collision patterns at SR 120/Brennan Avenue. Based on the data reviewed, collisions at this intersection appear to be primarily caused by:
• Speeding on SR 120
• Drivers on Brennan Avenue failing to yield to oncoming traffic on SR 120 (potentially due to long delays often experienced on the side street)
As previously noted, Caltrans is in the process of evaluating improvements at this intersection. Caltrans has their own design, safety, and operations standards and through application of their standards, the ultimate design of the intersection and its approaches would result in modifications aimed at reducing side-street delay, reducing speeds on SR 120, and accommodating traffic growth through the design year of the intersection improvements (2045 or beyond). While this analysis does not include detailed recommendations for intersection control or configuration changes, the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) list of “Proven Safety Countermeasures” was reviewed to evaluate if any immediate improvements could be made to help reduce collisions at the intersection.

Based on review of the Proven Safety Countermeasures, the following countermeasures have been proven to reduce fatal and severe injury collisions for the crash types listed above and could be considered by Caltrans and/or the City for near-term implementation.

Reduced Speed Limit on SR 120
The posted speed limit on SR 120 near Brennan Avenue is 55 miles per hour (MPH). Approximately 2,450 feet east of SR 120/Brennan Avenue (approaching SR 120/Walnut Avenue) the posted speed limit is reduced to 50 MPH. East of Walnut Avenue, the posted speed limit is further reduced to 40 MPH and ultimately 30 MPH approaching SR 120/McHenry Avenue.

The first proven safety countermeasure listed on the FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasure webpage5 is setting “Appropriate Speed Limits for All Road Users”. It notes that speed control is one of the most important methods for reducing fatalities and series injuries. Speed limits are traditionally based on engineering studies and speed surveys; however, FHWA encourages agencies to use additional tools which take into consideration existing speeds, roadway characteristics, and crash history. A speed survey on SR 120 has not yet been conducted so a formal speed limit recommendation cannot be provided at this time. 5 https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
If this countermeasure is implemented, a speed survey should be conducted and the appropriate speed limit for this segment of SR 120 should be re-evaluated using the USLIMITS2 tool and/or the NCHRP 966:

Posted Speed Limit Setting Procedure and Tool (or other tool as deemed appropriate by Caltrans). A reduced speed limit could be paired with sign and pavement markings to assist in alerting drivers on the highway that speeds should be reduced. Table 16 in FHWA’s Self Enforcing Roadways: A Guidance Report (FHWA, 2018)6 provides a variety of sign and pavement marking roadway treatments that affect speeds that can be considered. Examples include speed feedback signs with posted speed limit reminder sign, enhanced speed limit pavement markings with colored surfacing on road, transverse pavement markings, and more.

A description of each treatment along with its documented effectiveness, and an image are provided in the document.

Increasing and Modifying Existing Signage and Striping
FHWA’s “Systemic Application of Multiple Low-Cost Countermeasures at Stop-Controlled Intersections” is a systemic approach to intersection safety which involves incorporating multiple low-cost countermeasures such as enhanced signage and pavement marking, retroreflective sheeting on posts, doubling up signage and more.

It is noted that Caltrans installed a flashing beacon with an intersection advanced warning sign in October of 2024. Given the timing of this improvement, it is too soon to determine if this has resulted in a reduction of collisions. However, this should be monitored over the next year and if collision rates are not reduced, an additional flashing beacon with oversized advance intersection warning signs with supplemental street names on SR 120 could be installed. This would result in two flashing beacons as motorists approach the intersection from either direction. See Image 1 for example. 6https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/17098/17098.pdf?_gl=1*15co4n4*_ga*NTI1OTE1OTE1LjE3MT UwMzAzMDc.*_ga_VW1SFWJKBB*MTc0NDE1NjUxMC4xMi4xLjE3NDQxNTc2MDkuMC4wLjA.

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
Image 1 – Example of potential countermeasure that can be implemented on SR 120. Source: South Carolina DOT via FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasure webpage7
On Brennan Avenue, the following improvements could be implemented on the northbound approach:
• Doubled-up oversized advanced “Stop Ahead” intersection warning signs with (with or without flashing beacons) and retroreflective sheeting on sign posts (see Image 2). • Restriping the stop bar and marked “STOP” north of the railroad tracks. • Restripe stop bar south of the railroad tracks with “DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS” signage.

Image 2 – Example of countermeasure that can be implemented on Brennan Avenue. Source: South Carolina DOT via FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasure webpage8
7https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures/systemic-application-multiple-low-costcountermeasures-stop 8https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures/systemic-application-multiple-low-costcountermeasures-stop

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
It is noted that while the countermeasures listed above can be effective, they are lower-cost countermeasures that can be easier and faster to implement than more effective countermeasures such as a roundabout, access modifications, etc. They are recommended as first-step countermeasures that can be installed while the ultimate configuration for the intersection is still being evaluated by Caltrans.

yannodrahC
tC
Celivo
Way
Riesling
Way
rD ecorC
evA tunlaW
Chablis Dr
California St
Northwood St
A bl erto Ln
Carignane Way
nL anitselehC
Ribier Dr
Yosemite Ave
Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
evA nannerB
evA doowssoM
evA doowegdE
evA doowrairB
evA nannerB
yannodrahC
tC
Celivo
Way
Riesling
Way
rD ecorC
evA tunlaW
Chablis Dr
California St
Northwood St
A bl erto Ln
Carignane Way
nL anitselehC
Ribier Dr
Yosemite Ave
Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
evA nannerB
evA doowssoM
evA doowegdE
evA doowrairB
evA nannerB
120
37% (39%) 7% (5%)
13% (8%)
30% (20%)
7% (5%)
6% (23%)
AM% (PM%) AM & PM Inbound Trip Distribution Percentage Project Site C:\fpbox\Box\-Projects\RS-Projects\2023 Projects\4281.00_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon\Graphics\AI Inbound Project Trip Distribution
Figure 1
•
1111
N
A

yannodrahC
tC
Celivo
Way
Riesling
Way
rD ecorC
evA tunlaW
Chablis Dr
California St
Northwood St
A bl erto Ln
Carignane Way
nL anitselehC
Ribier Dr
Yosemite Ave
Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
evA nannerB
evA doowssoM
evA doowegdE
evA doowrairB
evA nannerB
yannodrahC
tC
Celivo
Way
Riesling
Way
rD ecorC
evA tunlaW
Chablis Dr
California St
Northwood St
A bl erto Ln
Carignane Way
nL anitselehC
Ribier Dr
Yosemite Ave
Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
evA nannerB
evA doowssoM
evA doowegdE
evA doowrairB
evA nannerB
120
37% (19%) 5% (4%)
6% (8%)
27% (23%)
19% (27%)
4% (15%)
2% (4%)
AM% (PM%) AM & PM Outbound Trip Distribution Percentage Project Site C:\fpbox\Box\-Projects\RS-Projects\2023 Projects\4281.00_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon\Graphics\AI Outbound Project Trip Distribution
Figure 2
•
1111
N
A

First St
Concord
Ct
Emperor
Ct
Chardonnay
Ct
Celivo
Way
Riesling Way
Croce Dr
Chianti
Ct
Carignane Way
Sanchez
Way
California St
Walnut Ave
Chablis Dr
Yosemite Ave
Northwood St
Alberto Ln
Chelestina Ln Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
Ribier Dr
Mosswood Ave
Edgewood Ave
Briarwood Ave
Brennan Ave Brennan Ave
12 34
dd
d
e
ac
e
ac
d
d
dd
g
g
d
Yosemite Ave (SR 120) California St Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
California St
Brennan RdBrennan Rd
59 (21)
8 (6)
10 (6)
2 (16)
46 (16)
3 (2)
51 (25)
4 (6)
35 (8)
68 (31)
3 (8)5 (20)4 (6)33 (60)9 (26)14 (21)20 (28)2 (2)
3 (4)
359 (785)
33 (63)
35 (15)
16 (11)
4 (7)
363 (781)
10 (16)
2 (2)
4 (5)
0 (0)
801 (445)
32 (46)
11 (17)
821 (433)
4 (3)
26 (8)
5 (4)

1. Brennan Rd/Yosemite Ave (SR 120) 2. Brennan Rd/California St 3. Walnut Ave/California St 4. Walnut Ave/Yosemite Ave (SR 120) \\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\RS\RS234281_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon\RS234281_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon.aprx Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
and Lane Configurations -
Existing Conditions
Figure 3
Study Intersection
Project Site
Park
Escalon City Limits AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Stop Sign
Turn Lane
a
120
1 •
•
e
•
. -
-
t)
• •
•
0 I
e
6

First St
Concord
Ct
Emperor
Ct
Chardonnay
Ct
Celivo
Way
Riesling Way
Croce Dr
Chianti
Ct
Carignane Way
Sanchez
Way
California St
Walnut Ave
Chablis Dr
Yosemite Ave
Northwood St
Alberto Ln
Chelestina Ln Noni Ave
Farinelli Pkwy
Ribier Dr
Mosswood Ave
Edgewood Ave
Briarwood Ave
Brennan Ave Brennan Ave
12 34
dd
d
e
ac
e
ac
d
d
dd
g
g
d
Yosemite Ave (SR 120) California St Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
California St
Brennan RdBrennan Rd
74 (26)
9 (7)
12 (7)
3 (26)
46 (16)
3 (2)
51 (25)
6 (10)35 (8)
79 (37)
3 (8)5 (20)4 (6)33 (60)15 (45)18 (30)20 (28)2 (2)
3 (4)
359 (785)
38 (80)
46 (21)
24 (18)
6 (11)
365 (782)
10 (16)
2 (2)
5 (7)
0 (0)
802 (447)
36 (55)
11 (17)
821 (433)
5 (5)
44 (15)
7 (6)

1. Brennan Rd/Yosemite Ave (SR 120) 2. Brennan Rd/California St 3. Walnut Ave/California St 4. Walnut Ave/Yosemite Ave (SR 120) \\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\RS\RS234281_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon\RS234281_Murphy_Ranch_Subdivision_Escalon.aprx Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
and Lane Configurations -
Existing Plus Project Conditions
Figure 4
Study Intersection
Project Site
Park
Escalon City Limits AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Turn Lane
a
120
1 Stop Sign
•
•
e
•
. -
-
t)
• •
•
0 I
e
6

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
ATTACHMENT 1

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 6:00 AM 3 1 2 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 42 3 0 0 46 0 122 1 0 0 123 1766:15 AM 7 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 62 1 0 0 64 0 150 1 0 0 151 2256:30 AM 9 0 0 0 0 9 2 2 3 0 0 7 2 75 6 0 0 83 0 168 0 0 0 168 2676:45 AM 13 1 2 0 0 16 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 70 7 0 0 77 0 177 1 0 0 178 274 Hourly Total 32 5 4 0 0 41 2 3 6 0 0 11 4 249 17 0 0 270 0 617 3 0 0 620 942 7:00 AM 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 74 2 0 0 77 1 202 1 0 0 204 2917:15 AM 16 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 74 3 0 0 77 0 178 5 0 0 183 2817:30 AM 14 2 1 0 0 17 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 85 5 0 0 91 0 197 0 0 0 197 3097:45 AM 16 3 5 0 0 24 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 107 13 0 0 120 2 206 2 0 0 210 357 Hourly Total 56 7 8 0 0 71 5 2 1 0 0 8 2 340 23 0 0 365 3 783 8 0 0 794 1238 8:00 AM 13 3 2 0 0 18 3 3 0 0 0 6 1 82 10 0 0 93 3 145 6 0 0 154 2718:15 AM 10 0 0 0 0 10 1 2 2 0 0 5 1 96 6 0 0 103 1 154 3 0 0 158 2768:30 AM 2 3 0 0 0 5 1 4 2 0 0 7 0 100 4 0 0 104 0 119 3 0 0 122 2388:45 AM 6 3 0 0 0 9 1 2 0 0 0 3 1 68 2 0 0 71 0 104 1 0 0 105 188 Hourly Total 31 9 2 0 0 42 6 11 4 0 0 21 3 346 22 0 0 371 4 522 13 0 0 539 973 9:00 AM 9 0 1 0 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 66 2 0 0 69 1 105 2 0 0 108 1899:15 AM 4 1 0 0 0 5 2 1 1 0 0 4 1 83 2 0 0 86 0 87 0 0 0 87 182 9:30 AM 8 2 1 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 77 2 0 0 79 0 101 0 0 0 101 1929:45 AM 7 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 100 3 0 0 106 2 84 2 0 0 88 203 Hourly Total 28 3 4 0 0 35 4 1 2 0 0 7 5 326 9 0 0 340 3 377 4 0 0 384 766 10:00 AM 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 1 0 4 2 89 3 0 0 94 1 89 0 0 0 90 193 10:15 AM 6 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 86 7 0 0 93 0 87 2 0 0 89 192 10:30 AM 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 81 6 0 0 88 0 81 1 0 0 82 175 10:45 AM 2 0 2 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 89 3 0 0 92 0 73 0 0 0 73 170 Hourly Total 16 1 2 0 0 19 3 3 3 1 0 10 3 345 19 0 0 367 1 330 3 0 0 334 730 11:00 AM 6 0 2 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 93 5 0 0 100 0 84 1 0 0 85 195 11:15 AM 2 2 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 93 2 0 0 95 1 86 3 0 0 90 192 11:30 AM 5 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 98 16 0 0 115 1 83 0 0 0 84 205 11:45 AM 4 0 1 0 0 5 2 4 2 0 0 8 2 95 2 0 0 99 3 83 4 0 0 90 202 Hourly Total 17 2 4 0 0 23 3 8 2 0 0 13 5 379 25 0 0 409 5 336 8 0 0 349 794 12:00 PM 5 0 0 0 0 5 2 2 3 0 0 7 2 119 9 0 0 130 1 95 3 0 0 99 241 12:15 PM 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 143 11 0 0 156 0 112 2 0 0 114 275 12:30 PM 4 1 1 0 0 6 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 83 10 0 0 93 3 106 1 0 0 110 213 12:45 PM 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 108 0 0 0 108 0 98 2 0 0 100 213 Hourly Total 12 2 1 0 0 15 5 5 7 0 0 17 4 453 30 0 0 487 4 411 8 0 0 423 942 1:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 4 1 84 6 0 0 91 2 100 1 0 0 103 1991:15 PM 4 1 1 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 1 3 0 103 5 0 0 108 1 131 5 0 0 137 2541:30 PM 12 2 2 0 0 16 3 1 2 0 0 6 2 104 8 0 0 114 0 98 2 0 0 100 236

1:45 PM 7 0 1 0 0 8 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 104 3 0 0 107 0 124 3 0 0 127 245 Hourly Total 24 3 4 0 0 31 6 6 4 0 1 16 3 395 22 0 0 420 3 453 11 0 0 467 934 2:00 PM 5 2 3 0 0 10 2 2 1 0 0 5 1 121 7 0 0 129 3 96 1 0 0 100 2442:15 PM 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 3 1 155 24 0 0 180 1 85 2 0 0 88 275 2:30 PM 7 1 0 0 0 8 0 2 2 0 0 4 1 118 15 0 0 134 0 99 1 0 0 100 2462:45 PM 3 0 4 0 0 7 2 2 0 0 0 4 1 152 9 0 0 162 0 129 4 0 0 133 306 Hourly Total 18 4 7 0 0 29 5 8 3 0 0 16 4 546 55 0 0 605 4 409 8 0 0 421 1071 3:00 PM 5 1 0 0 0 6 1 2 2 0 0 5 0 170 16 0 0 186 1 113 4 0 0 118 3153:15 PM 8 6 3 0 0 17 2 2 2 0 0 6 0 162 11 0 0 173 3 121 7 0 0 131 3273:30 PM 12 1 2 0 0 15 1 6 4 0 0 11 1 161 17 0 0 179 2 119 8 0 0 129 3343:45 PM 6 4 1 0 0 11 0 5 1 0 0 6 4 178 14 0 0 196 1 117 6 0 0 124 337 Hourly Total 31 12 6 0 0 49 4 15 9 0 0 28 5 671 58 0 0 734 7 470 25 0 0 502 1313 4:00 PM 10 1 0 0 0 11 1 5 4 0 0 10 2 185 21 0 0 208 0 80 4 0 0 84 313 4:15 PM 2 1 3 0 0 6 0 5 3 0 0 8 0 194 18 0 0 212 1 111 1 0 0 113 3394:30 PM 2 0 3 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 3 3 189 19 0 0 211 2 101 3 0 0 106 3254:45 PM 4 3 0 0 0 7 4 3 1 0 0 8 0 214 19 0 0 233 0 71 0 0 0 71 319 Hourly Total 18 5 6 0 0 29 7 14 8 0 0 29 5 782 77 0 0 864 3 363 8 0 0 374 1296 5:00 PM 8 0 1 0 0 9 1 7 2 0 0 10 0 193 15 0 0 208 1 93 5 0 0 99 326 5:15 PM 4 1 1 0 0 6 2 6 2 0 0 10 2 168 18 0 0 188 4 120 6 0 0 130 3345:30 PM 8 2 3 0 0 13 1 2 0 0 0 3 2 171 10 0 0 183 1 97 4 0 0 102 3015:45 PM 5 0 1 0 0 6 3 3 0 0 0 6 0 160 17 0 0 177 1 73 3 0 0 77 266 Hourly Total 25 3 6 0 0 34 7 18 4 0 0 29 4 692 60 0 0 756 7 383 18 0 0 408 1227 6:00 PM 2 0 2 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 4 1 122 15 0 0 138 0 64 1 0 0 65 211 6:15 PM 3 2 0 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 120 5 0 0 126 1 67 3 0 0 71 206 6:30 PM 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 0 5 0 71 7 0 0 78 1 67 4 0 0 72 158 6:45 PM 2 0 2 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 4 0 90 6 0 0 96 2 40 4 0 0 46 150 Hourly Total 10 2 4 0 0 16 7 7 3 0 0 17 2 403 33 0 0 438 4 238 12 0 0 254 725 7:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 77 1 0 0 79 1 37 1 0 0 39 121 7:15 PM 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 54 4 0 0 58 0 47 1 0 0 48 109 7:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 63 3 0 0 67 0 41 2 0 0 43 112 7:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 49 3 0 0 53 0 40 0 0 0 40 95 Hourly Total 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 5 1 0 0 7 3 243 11 0 0 257 1 165 4 0 0 170 437 *** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6:00 AM 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 42 3 0 0 45 0 133 0 0 0 133 182 6:15 AM 9 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 2 0 0 56 0 112 3 0 0 115 1816:30 AM 15 0 0 0 0 15 2 2 0 0 0 4 2 71 3 0 0 76 2 211 0 0 0 213 3086:45 AM 14 3 1 0 0 18 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 85 10 0 0 97 0 138 2 0 0 140 257 Hourly Total 39 5 1 0 0 45 2 2 4 0 0 8 4 252 18 0 0 274 2 594 5 0 0 601 928 7:00 AM 3 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 65 2 0 0 69 0 174 3 0 0 177 2527:15 AM 11 2 1 0 0 14 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 77 6 0 0 83 0 202 2 0 0 204 3047:30 AM 15 3 2 0 0 20 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 79 4 0 0 84 0 190 3 0 0 193 3007:45 AM 17 0 5 0 0 22 2 2 0 0 0 4 2 99 9 0 0 110 1 203 0 0 0 204 340 Hourly Total 46 5 9 0 0 60 4 3 5 0 0 12 5 320 21 0 0 346 1 769 8 0 0 778 1196 8:00 AM 8 3 1 0 0 12 1 3 1 0 0 5 0 120 7 0 0 127 2 168 6 0 0 176 3208:15 AM 6 2 0 0 0 8 1 2 2 0 0 5 3 91 3 0 0 97 2 139 5 0 0 146 2568:30 AM 7 3 1 0 0 11 3 1 1 0 0 5 1 101 4 0 0 106 1 141 1 0 0 143 2658:45 AM 6 0 3 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 84 5 0 0 93 4 102 2 0 0 108 211 Hourly Total 27 8 5 0 0 40 5 7 4 0 0 16 8 396 19 0 0 423 9 550 14 0 0 573 1052 9:00 AM 6 3 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 82 2 0 0 84 0 89 0 0 0 89 183 9:15 AM 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 77 6 0 0 83 0 114 3 0 0 117 2069:30 AM 8 0 0 0 0 8 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 81 5 0 0 86 0 95 1 0 0 96 194 9:45 AM 4 1 1 0 0 6 2 7 1 0 0 10 0 101 3 0 0 104 0 86 0 0 0 86 206

Hourly Total 21 5 1 0 0 27 5 10 2 0 0 17 0 341 16 0 0 357 0 384 4 0 0 388 789 10:00 AM 4 1 1 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 4 0 0 70 0 107 3 0 0 110 186 10:15 AM 8 1 4 0 2 13 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 75 4 0 0 80 0 91 3 0 0 94 191 10:30 AM 2 0 2 0 0 4 2 2 3 0 0 7 1 71 10 0 0 82 0 104 1 0 0 105 198 10:45 AM 4 2 1 0 0 7 1 1 2 0 0 4 0 83 3 0 0 86 0 72 0 0 0 72 169 Hourly Total 18 4 8 0 6 30 6 4 5 0 0 15 2 295 21 0 0 318 0 374 7 0 0 381 744 11:00 AM 8 0 0 0 0 8 2 1 3 0 0 6 1 96 4 0 0 101 0 79 2 0 0 81 196 11:15 AM 5 0 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 98 9 0 0 109 1 75 6 0 0 82 198 11:30 AM 4 1 1 0 0 6 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 87 6 0 0 93 2 99 4 0 0 105 208 11:45 AM 5 1 2 0 0 8 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 83 8 0 0 92 0 123 3 0 0 126 230 Hourly Total 22 2 4 0 0 28 2 8 5 0 0 15 4 364 27 0 0 395 3 376 15 0 0 394 832 12:00 PM 4 4 1 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 81 4 0 0 85 0 74 4 0 0 78 173 12:15 PM 5 0 1 0 0 6 4 0 2 0 0 6 2 97 3 0 0 102 1 87 1 0 0 89 203 12:30 PM 2 3 1 0 0 6 0 2 1 0 0 3 2 101 10 0 0 113 0 84 2 0 0 86 208 12:45 PM 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 103 5 0 0 109 1 81 4 0 0 86 201 Hourly Total 14 7 3 0 0 24 5 3 5 0 0 13 5 382 22 0 0 409 2 326 11 0 0 339 785 1:00 PM 5 2 0 0 0 7 0 2 3 0 0 5 3 112 5 1 0 121 0 103 0 0 0 103 2361:15 PM 3 0 1 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 94 9 0 0 103 1 102 1 0 0 104 2141:30 PM 8 2 0 0 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 99 11 0 0 110 0 127 2 0 0 129 2521:45 PM 15 0 2 0 0 17 1 1 3 0 0 5 1 82 4 0 0 87 1 89 1 0 0 91 200 Hourly Total 31 4 3 0 0 38 3 7 6 0 0 16 4 387 29 1 0 421 2 421 4 0 0 427 902 2:00 PM 5 0 0 0 0 5 4 2 3 0 0 9 2 138 10 0 1 150 1 94 4 0 0 99 263 2:15 PM 7 2 0 0 0 9 0 4 1 0 0 5 2 129 26 0 0 157 1 108 2 0 0 111 2822:30 PM 4 1 0 0 0 5 2 2 1 0 0 5 0 129 7 0 0 136 0 142 2 0 0 144 2902:45 PM 6 2 2 0 0 10 0 4 1 0 0 5 0 178 20 0 0 198 0 105 0 0 0 105 318 Hourly Total 22 5 2 0 0 29 6 12 6 0 0 24 4 574 63 0 1 641 2 449 8 0 0 459 1153 3:00 PM 7 1 0 0 0 8 3 4 4 0 0 11 0 160 12 0 0 172 0 122 3 0 0 125 3163:15 PM 8 2 2 0 0 12 1 2 1 0 0 4 1 150 13 0 0 164 0 121 5 0 0 126 3063:30 PM 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 2 0 0 7 1 170 17 0 0 188 3 120 4 0 0 127 3283:45 PM 6 2 2 0 0 10 1 4 2 0 0 7 1 171 17 0 0 189 1 112 5 0 0 118 324 Hourly Total 27 5 4 0 0 36 5 15 9 0 0 29 3 651 59 0 0 713 4 475 17 0 0 496 1274 4:00 PM 4 2 1 0 0 7 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 200 20 0 0 220 1 74 5 0 0 80 310 4:15 PM 2 2 1 0 0 5 1 10 2 0 0 13 0 196 28 0 0 224 4 93 2 0 0 99 341 4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 9 0 182 17 0 0 199 0 94 5 0 0 99 309 4:45 PM 5 1 1 0 0 7 3 5 1 0 0 9 0 205 13 0 0 218 0 116 2 0 0 118 352 Hourly Total 13 5 3 0 0 21 5 24 5 0 0 34 0 783 78 0 0 861 5 377 14 0 0 396 1312 5:00 PM 5 1 0 0 0 6 3 4 1 0 0 8 0 162 16 0 0 178 0 97 4 0 0 101 2935:15 PM 2 3 2 0 0 7 4 4 4 0 0 12 0 205 14 0 0 219 0 124 4 0 0 128 3665:30 PM 2 1 3 0 0 6 2 5 0 0 0 7 2 185 12 0 0 199 1 90 2 0 0 93 305 5:45 PM 4 1 3 0 0 8 0 2 1 0 0 3 1 159 8 0 0 168 2 77 1 0 0 80 259 Hourly Total 13 6 8 0 0 27 9 15 6 0 0 30 3 711 50 0 0 764 3 388 11 0 0 402 1223 6:00 PM 3 2 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 92 11 0 0 104 1 69 4 0 0 74 184 6:15 PM 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 5 1 65 3 0 0 69 0 66 1 0 0 67 144 6:30 PM 6 2 1 0 0 9 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 138 12 0 0 150 1 64 2 0 0 67 229 6:45 PM 3 2 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 89 11 0 0 101 2 43 2 0 0 47 154 Hourly Total 14 7 2 0 0 23 1 8 0 0 0 9 3 384 37 0 0 424 4 242 9 0 0 255 711 7:00 PM 2 1 2 0 0 5 3 2 1 0 0 6 0 93 5 0 0 98 0 45 2 0 0 47 156 7:15 PM 3 0 1 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 63 3 0 0 66 0 54 1 0 0 55 128 7:30 PM 1 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 58 7 0 0 65 1 48 2 0 0 51 120 7:45 PM 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 56 3 0 0 59 2 49 3 0 0 54 117 Hourly Total 7 3 4 0 0 14 6 5 1 0 0 12 0 270 18 0 0 288 3 196 8 0 0 207 521 *** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6:00 AM 2 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 46 2 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 147 200 6:15 AM 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 1 0 0 3 1 65 3 0 0 69 0 153 3 0 0 156 2376:30 AM 13 1 0 0 0 14 2 2 1 0 0 5 1 70 4 0 0 75 0 180 0 0 0 180 2746:45 AM 10 0 1 0 0 11 1 3 2 0 0 6 1 74 5 0 0 80 0 180 3 0 0 183 280 Hourly Total 34 2 2 0 0 38 3 7 5 0 0 15 3 255 14 0 0 272 0 660 6 0 0 666 991 7:00 AM 12 0 1 0 0 13 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 64 7 0 0 72 2 190 2 0 0 194 2817:15 AM 15 0 1 0 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 72 9 0 0 81 0 226 2 0 0 228 3277:30 AM 16 1 2 0 0 19 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 69 7 0 0 79 0 185 2 0 0 187 2877:45 AM 16 3 2 0 0 21 1 3 2 0 0 6 0 110 16 0 0 126 5 205 3 0 0 213 366 Hourly Total 59 4 6 0 0 69 1 6 5 0 0 12 4 315 39 0 0 358 7 806 9 0 0 822 1261 8:00 AM 12 2 6 0 0 20 2 4 0 0 0 6 1 111 7 0 0 119 2 159 6 0 0 167 3128:15 AM 7 2 2 0 0 11 1 5 0 0 0 6 2 100 8 0 0 110 0 134 2 0 0 136 2638:30 AM 11 3 0 0 0 14 1 2 1 0 0 4 1 85 4 0 0 90 1 112 3 0 0 116 2248:45 AM 6 1 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 82 4 0 0 87 0 88 2 0 0 90 185 Hourly Total 36 8 8 0 0 52 4 12 1 0 0 17 5 378 23 0 0 406 3 493 13 0 0 509 984 9:00 AM 4 2 1 0 0 7 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 71 3 0 0 74 1 97 1 0 0 99 184 9:15 AM 8 0 2 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 71 7 0 0 79 0 105 2 0 0 107 1979:30 AM 5 1 0 0 0 6 1 2 1 0 0 4 0 106 7 0 0 113 1 95 1 0 0 97 220 9:45 AM 2 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 3 0 72 7 0 0 79 1 102 3 0 0 106 191 Hourly Total 19 3 4 0 0 26 3 7 2 0 0 12 1 320 24 0 0 345 3 399 7 0 0 409 792 10:00 AM 8 0 1 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 0 7 1 101 4 0 0 106 1 91 3 0 0 95 217 10:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 4 0 99 6 0 0 105 0 65 0 0 0 65 175 10:30 AM 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 83 3 0 0 86 1 105 3 0 0 109 202 10:45 AM 7 3 3 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 95 6 0 0 104 3 32 2 0 0 37 154 Hourly Total 20 3 4 0 0 27 4 5 5 0 0 14 4 378 19 0 0 401 5 293 8 0 0 306 748 11:00 AM 11 2 2 0 0 15 2 4 2 0 0 8 0 87 3 0 0 90 2 112 7 0 0 121 234 11:15 AM 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 83 6 0 0 89 1 79 0 0 0 80 178 11:30 AM 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 4 2 104 2 0 0 108 0 78 2 0 0 80 195 11:45 AM 10 1 1 0 0 12 1 1 3 0 0 5 1 81 6 0 0 88 0 140 0 0 0 140 245 Hourly Total 25 7 4 0 0 36 7 8 5 0 0 20 3 355 17 0 0 375 3 409 9 0 0 421 852 12:00 PM 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 0 5 1 87 8 0 0 96 3 99 3 0 0 105 212 12:15 PM 1 4 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 99 5 0 0 105 1 95 2 0 0 98 210 12:30 PM 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 2 3 0 0 5 0 93 9 0 0 102 0 115 2 0 0 117 228 12:45 PM 2 1 2 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 114 2 0 0 117 1 104 2 0 0 107 231 Hourly Total 8 9 4 0 0 21 5 4 4 0 0 13 3 393 24 0 0 420 5 413 9 0 0 427 881 1:00 PM 7 0 0 0 0 7 3 3 0 0 0 6 1 110 8 0 0 119 1 104 5 0 0 110 2421:15 PM 4 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 109 9 0 0 118 1 87 5 0 0 93 219 1:30 PM 8 0 2 0 0 10 1 4 0 0 0 5 0 106 8 0 0 114 0 119 2 0 0 121 2501:45 PM 10 0 1 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 116 5 0 0 121 1 102 0 0 0 103 236 Hourly Total 29 2 3 0 0 34 5 8 1 0 0 14 1 441 30 0 0 472 3 412 12 0 0 427 947 2:00 PM 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 162 11 0 0 175 1 107 2 0 0 110 2962:15 PM 5 1 1 0 0 7 1 7 0 0 0 8 0 157 16 0 0 173 1 103 3 0 0 107 2952:30 PM 5 3 1 0 0 9 1 5 2 0 0 8 0 145 9 0 0 154 0 110 2 0 0 112 2832:45 PM 4 1 1 0 0 6 4 5 1 0 0 10 1 143 11 0 0 155 2 98 4 0 0 104 275 Hourly Total 25 5 3 0 0 33 6 17 3 0 0 26 3 607 47 0 0 657 4 418 11 0 0 433 1149 3:00 PM 4 0 1 0 0 5 2 4 3 0 0 9 1 156 13 0 0 170 1 94 1 0 0 96 280 3:15 PM 14 10 0 0 0 24 3 4 3 0 0 10 0 181 20 0 0 201 2 135 5 0 0 142 3773:30 PM 12 2 1 0 0 15 1 2 1 0 0 4 3 180 16 0 0 199 0 113 2 0 0 115 3333:45 PM 5 1 3 0 0 9 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 183 12 0 0 195 1 114 2 0 0 117 325 Hourly Total 35 13 5 0 0 53 6 13 8 0 0 27 4 700 61 0 0 765 4 456 10 0 0 470 1315 4:00 PM 3 2 2 0 0 7 0 4 3 0 0 7 1 187 12 0 0 200 0 104 5 0 0 109 3234:15 PM 3 1 5 0 0 9 2 7 1 0 0 10 1 210 12 0 0 223 0 94 5 0 0 99 341

4:30 PM 8 1 1 0 0 10 2 5 0 0 0 7 0 215 18 0 0 233 2 109 3 0 0 114 364 4:45 PM 4 1 2 0 1 7 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 193 12 0 0 208 2 127 4 0 0 133 354 Hourly Total 18 5 10 0 1 33 6 19 5 0 0 30 5 805 54 0 0 864 4 434 17 0 0 455 1382 5:00 PM 4 4 0 0 0 8 1 4 0 0 0 5 0 164 11 0 0 175 1 117 1 0 0 119 3075:15 PM 5 1 0 0 0 6 3 7 5 0 0 15 1 177 20 0 0 198 2 113 3 0 0 118 3375:30 PM 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 6 0 0 0 9 2 167 16 0 0 185 1 101 2 0 0 104 3005:45 PM 4 2 1 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 153 9 0 0 162 2 91 2 0 0 95 268 Hourly Total 13 8 2 0 0 23 7 21 5 0 0 33 3 661 56 0 0 720 6 422 8 0 0 436 1212 6:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 105 8 0 0 113 3 78 2 0 0 83 202 6:15 PM 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 102 5 0 0 107 1 67 1 0 0 69 181 6:30 PM 4 0 3 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 82 11 0 0 94 0 56 4 0 0 60 163 6:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 82 6 0 0 88 1 45 2 0 0 48 139 Hourly Total 9 2 3 0 0 14 4 4 1 0 0 9 1 371 30 0 0 402 5 246 9 0 0 260 685 7:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 85 6 0 0 91 1 51 0 0 0 52 147 7:15 PM 3 0 1 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 78 8 0 0 87 1 53 1 0 0 55 149 7:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 4 1 65 4 0 0 70 0 44 0 0 0 44 118 7:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 59 3 0 0 62 0 35 1 0 0 36 100 Hourly Total 3 0 2 0 0 5 6 4 2 0 0 12 2 287 21 0 0 310 2 183 2 0 0 187 514 Grand Total 966 201 176 0 7 1343 196 364 172 1 1 733 139 18546 1398 1 1 20084 143 17822 398 0 0 18363 40523 Approach % 71.9 15.0 13.1 0.0 - - 26.7 49.7 23.5 0.1 - - 0.7 92.3 7.0 0.0 - - 0.8 97.1 2.2 0.0 - - - Total % 2.4 0.5 0.4 0.0 - 3.3 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.0 - 1.8 0.3 45.8 3.4 0.0 - 49.6 0.4 44.0 1.0 0.0 - 45.3 - Lights 943 198 168 0 - 1309 180 357 138 1 - 676 114 17239 1372 1 - 18726 131 16413 370 0 - 16914 37625 % Lights 97.6 98.5 95.5 - - 97.5 91.8 98.1 80.2 100.0 - 92.2 82.0 93.0 98.1 100.0 - 93.2 91.6 92.1 93.0 - - 92.1 92.8 Buses 3 0 0 0 - 3 0 0 3 0 - 3 0 70 1 0 - 71 0 65 3 0 - 68 145 % Buses 0.3 0.0 0.0 - - 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 - 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 - 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 - - 0.4 0.4 Trucks 20 3 8 0 - 31 16 7 31 0 - 54 25 1237 25 0 - 1287 12 1344 25 0 - 1381 2753 % Trucks 2.1 1.5 4.5 - - 2.3 8.2 1.9 18.0 0.0 - 7.4 18.0 6.7 1.8 0.0 - 6.4 8.4 7.5 6.3 - - 7.5 6.8 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 14.3 - - - - - 0.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 6 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - 85.7 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 6 12/03/2024 6:00 AMEnding At12/05/2024 8:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
683 676 1359
3 3 6
53 54 107
0 0 00 0 0
739 733 1472
138 357 180 1 0
3 0 0 0 0
31 7 16 0 0
0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1
172 364 196 1 1

R T L U P
18918
0 0
1261
70 17587
Out
18363
0 0
1381
68 16914
In
37281
0 0
2642
138
34501
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
398
0 0
25 3
370
T
17822
0 0
1344
65 16413
L
143
0 0
12 0
131
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
1860 1309 3169
1 3 4
44 31 75
0 0 00 0 0
1905 1343 3248
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 943 198 168 00 3 0 0 00 20 3 8 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 60 966 201 176 7 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
36221
142
2682
0 0
39045
In
18726
71 1287
0 0
20084
Out
17495
71 1395
0 0
18961
1 0
0 0
0 1
U
114
0 25
0 0
139
L
17239
70 1237
0 0
18546
T
1372
1 25
0 0
1398
R
0 0
0 1
0 1
P
Turning Movement Data Plot
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 7 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:00 AM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:00 AM 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 74 2 0 0 77 1 202 1 0 0 204 2917:15 AM 16 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 74 3 0 0 77 0 178 5 0 0 183 2817:30 AM 14 2 1 0 0 17 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 85 5 0 0 91 0 197 0 0 0 197 3097:45 AM 16 3 5 0 0 24 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 107 13 0 0 120 2 206 2 0 0 210 357 Total 56 7 8 0 0 71 5 2 1 0 0 8 2 340 23 0 0 365 3 783 8 0 0 794 1238 Approach % 78.9 9.9 11.3 0.0 - - 62.5 25.0 12.5 0.0 - - 0.5 93.2 6.3 0.0 - - 0.4 98.6 1.0 0.0 - - - Total % 4.5 0.6 0.6 0.0 - 5.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 - 0.6 0.2 27.5 1.9 0.0 - 29.5 0.2 63.2 0.6 0.0 - 64.1 - PHF 0.875 0.583 0.400 0.000 - 0.740 0.417 0.500 0.250 0.000 - 0.500 0.500 0.794 0.442 0.000 - 0.760 0.375 0.950 0.400 0.000 - 0.945 0.867 Lights 54 7 8 0 - 69 3 2 1 0 - 6 2 301 23 0 - 326 2 740 7 0 - 749 1150 % Lights 96.4 100.0 100.0 - - 97.2 60.0 100.0 100.0 - - 75.0 100.0 88.5 100.0 - - 89.3 66.7 94.5 87.5 - - 94.3 92.9 Buses 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 2 0 0 - 2 3 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 - - 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 - - 0.3 0.2 Trucks 2 0 0 0 - 2 2 0 0 0 - 2 0 38 0 0 - 38 1 41 1 0 - 43 85 % Trucks 3.6 0.0 0.0 - - 2.8 40.0 0.0 0.0 - - 25.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 - - 10.4 33.3 5.2 12.5 - - 5.4 6.9 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 8 Peak Hour Data
12/03/2024 7:00 AMEnding At12/03/2024 8:00 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
16 6 22
0 0 01 2 30 0 00 0 0
17 8 25
1 2 3 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 01 2 5 0 0

R T L U P
353
0 0
40 1
312
Out
794
0 0
43 2
749
In
1147
0 0
83 3
1061
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
8 0
0 1
0 7
T
783
0 0
41 2
740
L
3 0
0 1
0 2
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
27 69 96
0 0 01 2 30 0 00 0 0
28 71 99
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 54 7 8 00 0 0 0 00 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 56 7 8 0 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1121
3 81
0 0
1205
In
326
1 38
0 0
365
Out
795
2 43
0 0
840
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
2 0
0 0
0 2
L
301
1 38
0 0
340
T
23 0
0 0
0 23
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:00 AM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 9 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:30 PM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 3:30 PM 12 1 2 0 0 15 1 6 4 0 0 11 1 161 17 0 0 179 2 119 8 0 0 129 3343:45 PM 6 4 1 0 0 11 0 5 1 0 0 6 4 178 14 0 0 196 1 117 6 0 0 124 3374:00 PM 10 1 0 0 0 11 1 5 4 0 0 10 2 185 21 0 0 208 0 80 4 0 0 84 313 4:15 PM 2 1 3 0 0 6 0 5 3 0 0 8 0 194 18 0 0 212 1 111 1 0 0 113 339 Total 30 7 6 0 0 43 2 21 12 0 0 35 7 718 70 0 0 795 4 427 19 0 0 450 1323 Approach % 69.8 16.3 14.0 0.0 - - 5.7 60.0 34.3 0.0 - - 0.9 90.3 8.8 0.0 - - 0.9 94.9 4.2 0.0 - - - Total % 2.3 0.5 0.5 0.0 - 3.3 0.2 1.6 0.9 0.0 - 2.6 0.5 54.3 5.3 0.0 - 60.1 0.3 32.3 1.4 0.0 - 34.0 - PHF 0.625 0.438 0.500 0.000 - 0.717 0.500 0.875 0.750 0.000 - 0.795 0.438 0.925 0.833 0.000 - 0.938 0.500 0.897 0.594 0.000 - 0.872 0.976 Lights 29 7 6 0 - 42 2 21 10 0 - 33 6 688 67 0 - 761 4 390 18 0 - 412 1248 % Lights 96.7 100.0 100.0 - - 97.7 100.0 100.0 83.3 - - 94.3 85.7 95.8 95.7 - - 95.7 100.0 91.3 94.7 - - 91.6 94.3 Buses 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 5 0 0 - 5 0 1 1 0 - 2 8 % Buses 3.3 0.0 0.0 - - 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 - - 0.6 0.0 0.2 5.3 - - 0.4 0.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 2 0 - 2 1 25 3 0 - 29 0 36 0 0 - 36 67 % Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 - - 5.7 14.3 3.5 4.3 - - 3.6 0.0 8.4 0.0 - - 8.0 5.1 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 10 Peak Hour Data
12/03/2024 3:30 PMEnding At12/03/2024 4:30 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
31 33 64
1 0 11 2 30 0 00 0 0
33 35 68
10 21 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 02 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
12 21 2 0 0

R T L U P
726
0 0
25 5
696
Out
450
0 0
36 2
412
In
1176
0 0
61 7
1108
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
19 0
0 0
1 18
T
427
0 0
36 1
390
L
4 0
0 0
0 4
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
92 42 134
0 1 13 0 30 0 00 0 0
95 43 138
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 29 7 6 00 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 30 7 6 0 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1190
7 67
0 0
1264
In
761
5 29
0 0
795
Out
429
2 38
0 0
469
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
6 0
1 0
0 7
L
688
5 25
0 0
718
T
67 0
3 0
0 70
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (3:30 PM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 11 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:15 AM 11 2 1 0 0 14 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 77 6 0 0 83 0 202 2 0 0 204 3047:30 AM 15 3 2 0 0 20 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 79 4 0 0 84 0 190 3 0 0 193 3007:45 AM 17 0 5 0 0 22 2 2 0 0 0 4 2 99 9 0 0 110 1 203 0 0 0 204 3408:00 AM 8 3 1 0 0 12 1 3 1 0 0 5 0 120 7 0 0 127 2 168 6 0 0 176 320 Total 51 8 9 0 0 68 5 5 5 0 0 15 3 375 26 0 0 404 3 763 11 0 0 777 1264 Approach % 75.0 11.8 13.2 0.0 - - 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 - - 0.7 92.8 6.4 0.0 - - 0.4 98.2 1.4 0.0 - - - Total % 4.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 - 5.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 - 1.2 0.2 29.7 2.1 0.0 - 32.0 0.2 60.4 0.9 0.0 - 61.5 - PHF 0.750 0.667 0.450 0.000 - 0.773 0.625 0.417 0.625 0.000 - 0.750 0.375 0.781 0.722 0.000 - 0.795 0.375 0.940 0.458 0.000 - 0.952 0.929 Lights 51 8 9 0 - 68 5 5 4 0 - 14 3 342 26 0 - 371 3 720 11 0 - 734 1187 % Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 80.0 - - 93.3 100.0 91.2 100.0 - - 91.8 100.0 94.4 100.0 - - 94.5 93.9 Buses 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 2 0 0 - 2 3 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 - - 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 - - 0.3 0.2 Trucks 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 32 0 0 - 32 0 41 0 0 - 41 74 % Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 - - 6.7 0.0 8.5 0.0 - - 7.9 0.0 5.4 0.0 - - 5.3 5.9 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 12 Peak Hour Data
12/04/2024 7:15 AMEnding At12/04/2024 8:15 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
22 14 36
0 0 00 1 10 0 00 0 0
22 15 37
4 5 5 0 00 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 05 5 5 0 0

R T L U P
389
0 0
32 1
356
Out
777
0 0
41 2
734
In
1166
0 0
73 3
1090
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
11 0
0 0
0 11
T
763
0 0
41 2
720
L
3 0
0 0
0 3
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
34 68 102
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
34 68 102
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 51 8 9 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 51 8 9 0 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1146
3 74
0 0
1223
In
371
1 32
0 0
404
Out
775
2 42
0 0
819
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
3 0
0 0
0 3
L
342
1 32
0 0
375
T
26 0
0 0
0 26
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 13 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 9 0 182 17 0 0 199 0 94 5 0 0 99 309 4:45 PM 5 1 1 0 0 7 3 5 1 0 0 9 0 205 13 0 0 218 0 116 2 0 0 118 3525:00 PM 5 1 0 0 0 6 3 4 1 0 0 8 0 162 16 0 0 178 0 97 4 0 0 101 2935:15 PM 2 3 2 0 0 7 4 4 4 0 0 12 0 205 14 0 0 219 0 124 4 0 0 128 366 Total 14 5 3 0 0 22 11 21 6 0 0 38 0 754 60 0 0 814 0 431 15 0 0 446 1320 Approach % 63.6 22.7 13.6 0.0 - - 28.9 55.3 15.8 0.0 - - 0.0 92.6 7.4 0.0 - - 0.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 - - - Total % 1.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 - 1.7 0.8 1.6 0.5 0.0 - 2.9 0.0 57.1 4.5 0.0 - 61.7 0.0 32.7 1.1 0.0 - 33.8 - PHF 0.700 0.417 0.375 0.000 - 0.786 0.688 0.656 0.375 0.000 - 0.792 0.000 0.920 0.882 0.000 - 0.929 0.000 0.869 0.750 0.000 - 0.871 0.902 Lights 14 5 3 0 - 22 11 21 6 0 - 38 0 733 60 0 - 793 0 409 15 0 - 424 1277 % Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 - 97.2 100.0 - - 97.4 - 94.9 100.0 - - 95.1 96.7 Buses 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 1 0 0 - 1 2 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.1 0.0 - - 0.1 - 0.2 0.0 - - 0.2 0.2 Trucks 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 20 0 0 - 20 0 21 0 0 - 21 41 % Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 - 2.7 0.0 - - 2.5 - 4.9 0.0 - - 4.7 3.1 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 14 Peak Hour Data
12/04/2024 4:30 PMEnding At12/04/2024 5:30 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
20 38 58
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
20 38 58
6 21 11 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 06 21 11 0 0

R T L U P
768
0 0
20 1
747
Out
446
0 0
21 1
424
In
1214
0 0
41 2
1171
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
15 0
0 0
0 15
T
431
0 0
21 1
409
L
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
81 22 103
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
81 22 103
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 14 5 3 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 14 5 3 0 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1222
2 41
0 0
1265
In
793
1 20
0 0
814
Out
429
1 21
0 0
451
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
L
733
1 20
0 0
754
T
60 0
0 0
0 60
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 15 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 7:15 AM 15 0 1 0 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 72 9 0 0 81 0 226 2 0 0 228 3277:30 AM 16 1 2 0 0 19 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 69 7 0 0 79 0 185 2 0 0 187 2877:45 AM 16 3 2 0 0 21 1 3 2 0 0 6 0 110 16 0 0 126 5 205 3 0 0 213 3668:00 AM 12 2 6 0 0 20 2 4 0 0 0 6 1 111 7 0 0 119 2 159 6 0 0 167 312 Total 59 6 11 0 0 76 3 9 4 0 0 16 4 362 39 0 0 405 7 775 13 0 0 795 1292 Approach % 77.6 7.9 14.5 0.0 - - 18.8 56.3 25.0 0.0 - - 1.0 89.4 9.6 0.0 - - 0.9 97.5 1.6 0.0 - - - Total % 4.6 0.5 0.9 0.0 - 5.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 - 1.2 0.3 28.0 3.0 0.0 - 31.3 0.5 60.0 1.0 0.0 - 61.5 - PHF 0.922 0.500 0.458 0.000 - 0.905 0.375 0.563 0.500 0.000 - 0.667 0.333 0.815 0.609 0.000 - 0.804 0.350 0.857 0.542 0.000 - 0.872 0.883 Lights 59 6 8 0 - 73 2 9 4 0 - 15 4 333 37 0 - 374 5 711 12 0 - 728 1190 % Lights 100.0 100.0 72.7 - - 96.1 66.7 100.0 100.0 - - 93.8 100.0 92.0 94.9 - - 92.3 71.4 91.7 92.3 - - 91.6 92.1 Buses 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 3 0 0 - 3 3 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 - - 0.4 0.2 Trucks 0 0 3 0 - 3 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 29 2 0 - 31 2 61 1 0 - 64 99 % Trucks 0.0 0.0 27.3 - - 3.9 33.3 0.0 0.0 - - 6.3 0.0 8.0 5.1 - - 7.7 28.6 7.9 7.7 - - 8.1 7.7 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 16 Peak Hour Data
12/05/2024 7:15 AMEnding At12/05/2024 8:15 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
22 15 37
0 0 01 1 20 0 00 0 0
23 16 39
4 9 2 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 04 9 3 0 0

R T L U P
376
0 0
33 0
343
Out
795
0 0
64 3
728
In
1171
0 0
97 3
1071
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
13 0
0 1
0 12
T
775
0 0
61 3
711
L
7 0
0 2
0 5
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
51 73 124
0 0 04 3 70 0 00 0 0
55 76 131
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 59 6 8 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 3 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 59 6 11 0 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1148
3 92
0 0
1243
In
374
0 31
0 0
405
Out
774
3 61
0 0
838
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
4 0
0 0
0 4
L
333
0 29
0 0
362
T
37 0
2 0
0 39
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 17 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:00 PM)
Start Time
NB Brennan Rd SB Brennan Rd EB SR 120 WB SR 120
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turn Peds App. Total Int. Total 4:00 PM 3 2 2 0 0 7 0 4 3 0 0 7 1 187 12 0 0 200 0 104 5 0 0 109 3234:15 PM 3 1 5 0 0 9 2 7 1 0 0 10 1 210 12 0 0 223 0 94 5 0 0 99 341 4:30 PM 8 1 1 0 0 10 2 5 0 0 0 7 0 215 18 0 0 233 2 109 3 0 0 114 3644:45 PM 4 1 2 0 1 7 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 193 12 0 0 208 2 127 4 0 0 133 354 Total 18 5 10 0 1 33 6 19 5 0 0 30 5 805 54 0 0 864 4 434 17 0 0 455 1382 Approach % 54.5 15.2 30.3 0.0 - - 20.0 63.3 16.7 0.0 - - 0.6 93.2 6.3 0.0 - - 0.9 95.4 3.7 0.0 - - - Total % 1.3 0.4 0.7 0.0 - 2.4 0.4 1.4 0.4 0.0 - 2.2 0.4 58.2 3.9 0.0 - 62.5 0.3 31.4 1.2 0.0 - 32.9 - PHF 0.563 0.625 0.500 0.000 - 0.825 0.750 0.679 0.417 0.000 - 0.750 0.417 0.936 0.750 0.000 - 0.927 0.500 0.854 0.850 0.000 - 0.855 0.949 Lights 18 5 10 0 - 33 6 19 5 0 - 30 3 787 54 0 - 844 4 407 16 0 - 427 1334 % Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 60.0 97.8 100.0 - - 97.7 100.0 93.8 94.1 - - 93.8 96.5 Buses 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 2 0 0 - 2 0 2 0 0 - 2 4 % Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 - - 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 - - 0.4 0.3 Trucks 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 2 16 0 0 - 18 0 25 1 0 - 26 44 % Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 40.0 2.0 0.0 - - 2.1 0.0 5.8 5.9 - - 5.7 3.2 Bicycles on
Crosswalk - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Caltrans District 10 -- Freeway & Highway Operations
1976 E Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
Stockton, California, United States 95205
209-986-9254 [email protected]
Count Name: SJ-120-15.86/Brennan RdSite Code:Start Date: 12/03/2024Page No: 18 Peak Hour Data
12/05/2024 4:00 PMEnding At12/05/2024 5:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestrians SB Brennan Rd [SB]
Out In Total
24 30 54
0 0 03 0 30 0 00 0 0
27 30 57
5 19 6 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 05 19 6 0 0

R T L U P
821
0 0
16 2
803
Out
455
0 0
26 2
427
In
1276
0 0
42 4
1230
Total
WB SR 120 [WB]
R
17 0
0 1
0 16
T
434
0 0
25 2
407
L
4 0
0 0
0 4
U
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
0 0
0 0
0 0
77 33 110
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
77 33 110
Out In Total
NB Brennan Rd [NB]

U L T R P
0 18 5 10 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 00 18 5 10 1 EB SR 120 [EB]
Total
1274
4 43
0 0
1321
In
844
2 18
0 0
864
Out
430
2 25
0 0
457
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
3 0
2 0
0 5
L
787
2 16
0 0
805
T
54 0
0 0
0 54
R
0 0
0 0
0 0
P
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:00 PM)
fJ + 4
t
....
.-
• 4
,,fl .., t rt

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Period NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 3 44 0 0 647:05 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 88 0 0 1097:10 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 1 62 0 0 897:15 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 1 63 0 0 877:20 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 1 65 0 0 947:25 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 2 70 0 0 1007:30 AM 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 0 0 84 0 0 1167:35 AM 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 2 60 0 0 917:40 AM 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 3 71 0 0 1207:45 AM 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 2 75 0 0 1137:50 AM 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 3 0 4 60 0 0 1157:55 AM 3 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 0 2 86 0 0 1358:00 AM 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 0 7 61 0 0 1188:05 AM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 3 0 3 60 0 0 1038:10 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1 0 5 46 0 0 1028:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 0 3 37 0 0 728:20 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 0 3 50 0 0 1048:25 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 0 0 48 0 0 758:30 AM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 1 0 1 51 0 0 1008:35 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 3 39 0 0 898:40 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 1 28 0 0 638:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 50 0 0 828:50 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 0 2 21 0 0 568:55 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 0 1 32 0 0 65

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Period NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000005001067:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 0 137:10 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 137:15 AM 00100003005097:20 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 117:25 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0 127:30 AM 00000003003067:35 AM 00000001003047:40 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 137:45 AM 00000004004087:50 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 107:55 AM 00000002007098:00 AM 00100001005078:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 128:10 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 2 0 128:15 AM 00000003005088:20 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 138:25 AM 00000002005078:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 12 0 228:35 AM 00000005003088:40 AM 00000001002038:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 10 0 148:50 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 5 0 138:55 AM 0000000200608

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
BUS VOLUMESTime Period NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Period South LegNorth Leg West Leg East Leg Total 7:00 AM 000007:05 AM 000007:10 AM 000007:15 AM 000007:20 AM 000007:25 AM 000007:30 AM 000007:35 AM 000007:40 AM 000007:45 AM 000007:50 AM 000007:55 AM 000008:00 AM 000008:05 AM 000008:10 AM 000008:15 AM 000008:20 AM 000008:25 AM 000008:30 AM 000008:35 AM 000008:40 AM 000008:45 AM 000008:50 AM 000008:55 AM 00000

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Period NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000000000007:05 AM 00000000000007:10 AM 00000000000007:15 AM 00000000000007:20 AM 00000000000007:25 AM 00000000000007:30 AM 00000000000007:35 AM 00000000000007:40 AM 00000000000007:45 AM 00000000000007:50 AM 00000000000007:55 AM 00000000000008:00 AM 00000000000008:05 AM 00000000000008:10 AM 00000000000008:15 AM 00000000000008:20 AM 00000000000008:25 AM 00000000000008:30 AM 00000000000008:35 AM 00000000000008:40 AM 00000000000008:45 AM 00000000000008:50 AM 00000000000008:55 AM 0000000000000

16953407 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Period NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 2 0 2 45 0 0 1203:35 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 3 29 0 0 913:40 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 2 0 2 41 0 0 953:45 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 1 0 3 46 0 0 1223:50 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 3 0 4 37 0 0 1183:55 PM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 2 0 1 29 0 0 1054:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 1 0 2 16 0 0 864:05 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 1 0 3 55 0 0 1284:10 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 2 0 3 41 0 0 1124:15 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 2 0 1 29 0 0 1174:20 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 3 0 2 43 0 0 964:25 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 1 0 0 39 0 0 1114:30 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 2 36 0 0 964:35 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 2 0 1 23 0 0 924:40 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 3 0 8 49 0 0 1144:45 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 3 0 3 39 0 0 1284:50 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 4 37 0 0 1024:55 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 4 33 0 0 1115:00 PM 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 5 27 0 0 1065:05 PM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 3 0 6 41 0 0 1215:10 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 1 0 5 43 0 0 1195:15 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 1 0 4 33 0 0 1045:20 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 1 0 3 49 0 0 1235:25 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 2 0 1 35 0 0 111

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 113:35 PM 00000001003043:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 103:45 PM 00000005004093:50 PM 00000004001053:55 PM 00000005004094:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 104:05 PM 00000001004054:10 PM 00000005002074:15 PM 00000003004074:20 PM 00000001004054:25 PM 00000006002084:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 6 0 104:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 3 0 104:40 PM 00000002006084:45 PM 00000004002064:50 PM 00000001002034:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 4 0 115:00 PM 00000003004075:05 PM 00000005004095:10 PM 00100006002095:15 PM 00000001003045:20 PM 00000005001065:25 PM 0000000300306

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
BUS VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Perio South Leg North Leg West Leg East Leg Total 3:30 PM 000003:35 PM 000003:40 PM 000003:45 PM 000003:50 PM 000003:55 PM 000004:00 PM 000004:05 PM 000004:10 PM 000004:15 PM 000004:20 PM 000004:25 PM 000004:30 PM 000004:35 PM 000004:40 PM 000004:45 PM 000004:50 PM 000004:55 PM 000005:00 PM 000005:05 PM 000005:10 PM 000005:15 PM 000005:20 PM 000005:25 PM 00000

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 00000000000003:35 PM 00000000000003:40 PM 00000000000003:45 PM 00000000000003:50 PM 00000000000003:55 PM 00000000000004:00 PM 00000000000004:05 PM 00000000000004:10 PM 00000000000004:15 PM 00000000000004:20 PM 00000000000004:25 PM 00000000000004:30 PM 00000000000004:35 PM 00000000000004:40 PM 00000000000004:45 PM 00000000000004:50 PM 00000000000004:55 PM 00000000000005:00 PM 00000000000005:05 PM 00000000000005:10 PM 00000000000005:15 PM 00000000000005:20 PM 00000000000005:25 PM 0000000000000

16953408 - Walnut Ave -- Yosemite Ave
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 7:00 AM 0100 0210 0000 0000 47:05 AM 0200 0000 0000 0000 27:10 AM 0100 0100 0100 0000 37:15 AM 0100 0010 2210 0000 77:20 AM 1300 0010 2200 0000 97:25 AM 0200 0110 1000 0000 57:30 AM 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 117:35 AM 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 137:40 AM 0400 0120 1100 0000 97:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 107:50 AM 0 5 1 0 0 3 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 187:55 AM 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 168:00 AM 0 6 0 0 0 5 1 0 9 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 258:05 AM 0 6 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108:10 AM 0 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 158:15 AM 0100 0230 0110 0000 88:20 AM 0100 1400 0200 0000 88:25 AM 0100 0100 1020 0111 88:30 AM 0400 0110 0000 0200 88:35 AM 0200 0210 0110 0100 88:40 AM 1000 0010 1000 0000 38:45 AM 0100 0100 1000 0100 48:50 AM 0200 0110 1000 0000 58:55 AM 1000 0020 0210 0000 6

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000000000007:05 AM 00000000000007:10 AM 00000000000007:15 AM 00000001000017:20 AM 00000000000007:25 AM 01000000000017:30 AM 00000000100017:35 AM 00000000000007:40 AM 00000000000007:45 AM 00000000000007:50 AM 00000000000007:55 AM 00000000000008:00 AM 00000000000008:05 AM 00000000000008:10 AM 00000000000008:15 AM 00000000000008:20 AM 00000000000008:25 AM 00000000000008:30 AM 00001000000018:35 AM 00000000000008:40 AM 10000000000018:45 AM 00000000000008:50 AM 00000000000008:55 AM 0000000010001

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
BUS VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Perio South Leg North Leg West Leg East Leg Total 7:00 AM 000007:05 AM 000007:10 AM 000007:15 AM 000007:20 AM 010017:25 AM 300037:30 AM 001017:35 AM 000007:40 AM 000007:45 AM 000007:50 AM 000007:55 AM 000008:00 AM 000008:05 AM 400048:10 AM 200028:15 AM 000008:20 AM 000008:25 AM 000008:30 AM 000008:35 AM 020028:40 AM 000008:45 AM 100018:50 AM 100018:55 AM 00101

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000000000007:05 AM 00000000000007:10 AM 00000000000007:15 AM 00000000000007:20 AM 00000000000007:25 AM 00000000000007:30 AM 00000000000007:35 AM 00000000000007:40 AM 00000000000007:45 AM 00000000000007:50 AM 00000000000007:55 AM 00000000000008:00 AM 00000000000008:05 AM 00000000000008:10 AM 00000000001018:15 AM 00000000100018:20 AM 00000000000008:25 AM 00000000000008:30 AM 00000000000008:35 AM 00000000000008:40 AM 00000000000008:45 AM 00000000000008:50 AM 00000000000008:55 AM 0000000000000

16953409 - Walnut Ave -- California St
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 3:30 PM 0100 0210 0100 0000 53:35 PM 0100 0310 0110 0000 73:40 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 113:45 PM 1200 1120 1000 0100 93:50 PM 1100 0220 1100 0000 83:55 PM 0400 0200 2000 0100 94:00 PM 0000 0110 0220 0100 74:05 PM 0100 0320 0100 0100 84:10 PM 1300 0000 1020 0100 84:15 PM 1010 1400 1100 0000 94:20 PM 1100 0200 1000 0100 64:25 PM 2100 0200 0100 0000 64:30 PM 3400 1000 1000 0000 94:35 PM 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 104:40 PM 2 1 0 0 0 6 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 174:45 PM 1 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 104:50 PM 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 144:55 PM 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 135:00 PM 1310 0120 0000 0000 85:05 PM 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 125:10 PM 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 135:15 PM 0200 0220 1110 0000 95:20 PM 1000 0310 0000 0000 55:25 PM 1200 0010 1000 0000 5

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 00000000000003:35 PM 00000000000003:40 PM 00000000000003:45 PM 00000000000003:50 PM 00000000000003:55 PM 00000000000004:00 PM 00000000000004:05 PM 00000000000004:10 PM 00000000000004:15 PM 00000001000014:20 PM 00000000000004:25 PM 00000000000004:30 PM 01000000000014:35 PM 00000000100014:40 PM 01000100000024:45 PM 00000000000004:50 PM 00000001000014:55 PM 00000000000005:00 PM 00000000000005:05 PM 00000000000005:10 PM 00000000000005:15 PM 00000000000005:20 PM 00000000000005:25 PM 0000000000000

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
BUS VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Perio South Leg North Leg West Leg East Leg Total 3:30 PM 000003:35 PM 000003:40 PM 000003:45 PM 000003:50 PM 000003:55 PM 000004:00 PM 000004:05 PM 000004:10 PM 020024:15 PM 000004:20 PM 000004:25 PM 000004:30 PM 200024:35 PM 000004:40 PM 000004:45 PM 000004:50 PM 000004:55 PM 000005:00 PM 000005:05 PM 100015:10 PM 100015:15 PM 010125:20 PM 020025:25 PM 00000

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 00000000000003:35 PM 00000000000003:40 PM 00000000000003:45 PM 00000000000003:50 PM 00000001000013:55 PM 00000000000004:00 PM 00000000000004:05 PM 00000000000004:10 PM 00000000000004:15 PM 00000000000004:20 PM 00000000000004:25 PM 20000000000024:30 PM 00000000000004:35 PM 00000000000004:40 PM 00000000000004:45 PM 00000000000004:50 PM 00000000000004:55 PM 00000000000005:00 PM 00000000000005:05 PM 00000000000005:10 PM 00000000000005:15 PM 00000000000005:20 PM 00000000000005:25 PM 0000000000000

16953410 - Walnut Ave -- California St
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 7:00 AM 0100 2000 0000 0030 67:05 AM 0 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 137:10 AM 0400 0000 0000 0010 57:15 AM 0310 0100 0000 0020 77:20 AM 0300 0100 0000 1030 87:25 AM 0000 1200 0000 0000 37:30 AM 0300 0200 0000 0010 67:35 AM 0300 0200 0000 0010 67:40 AM 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 147:45 AM 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 127:50 AM 0200 0300 0000 0030 87:55 AM 0 8 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 218:00 AM 0 7 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 208:05 AM 0600 1200 0000 0000 98:10 AM 0 4 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 148:15 AM 0300 0200 0000 0010 68:20 AM 0200 0100 0000 0000 38:25 AM 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 108:30 AM 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 128:35 AM 0000 0200 0000 0000 28:40 AM 0100 0000 0000 1000 28:45 AM 0000 0200 0000 0010 38:50 AM 0300 0200 0000 0010 68:55 AM 0110 0000 0000 0000 2

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000000000007:05 AM 00000000000007:10 AM 00000000000007:15 AM 00000000000007:20 AM 00001000000017:25 AM 00000000000007:30 AM 00000000000007:35 AM 00000000000007:40 AM 00000000000007:45 AM 00000000000007:50 AM 00000000000007:55 AM 00000000000008:00 AM 00000000000008:05 AM 00000000000008:10 AM 00000000000008:15 AM 00000000000008:20 AM 00000000000008:25 AM 01000000000018:30 AM 00000000000008:35 AM 00000000000008:40 AM 00000000000008:45 AM 00000000000008:50 AM 00000000000008:55 AM 0000000000000

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
BUS VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Perio South Leg North Leg West Leg East Leg Total 7:00 AM 000007:05 AM 000007:10 AM 000007:15 AM 000007:20 AM 000007:25 AM 000007:30 AM 000007:35 AM 000007:40 AM 000007:45 AM 000007:50 AM 000007:55 AM 000008:00 AM 000008:05 AM 000008:10 AM 000008:15 AM 000008:20 AM 000008:25 AM 000008:30 AM 000008:35 AM 000008:40 AM 000008:45 AM 000008:50 AM 000008:55 AM 00000

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM 00000000000007:05 AM 00000000000007:10 AM 00000000000007:15 AM 00000000000007:20 AM 00000000000007:25 AM 00000000000007:30 AM 00000000000007:35 AM 00000000000007:40 AM 00000000000007:45 AM 00000000000007:50 AM 00000000000007:55 AM 00000000000008:00 AM 00000000000008:05 AM 00000000000008:10 AM 00000000000008:15 AM 00000000000008:20 AM 00000000000008:25 AM 00000000000008:30 AM 00000000000008:35 AM 00000000000008:40 AM 00000000000008:45 AM 00000000000008:50 AM 00000000000008:55 AM 0000000000000

16953411 - Brennan Rd -- California St
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 7:00 AM7:05 AM7:10 AM7:15 AM7:20 AM7:25 AM7:30 AM7:35 AM7:40 AM7:45 AM7:50 AM7:55 AM8:00 AM8:05 AM8:10 AM8:15 AM8:20 AM8:25 AM8:30 AM8:35 AM8:40 AM8:45 AM8:50 AM8:55 AM

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
ALL-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right NB U-Turn NB RTOR SB Left SB Thru SB Right SB U-Turn SB RTOR EB Left EB Thru EB Right EB U-Turn EB RTOR WB Left WB Thru WB Right WB U-TurnWB RTOR Total 3:30 PM 0400 1200 0000 1000 83:35 PM 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 113:40 PM 0300 1400 0000 0000 83:45 PM 0100 0500 0000 0010 73:50 PM 0 2 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 113:55 PM 0 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 134:00 PM 0 2 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 114:05 PM 0 2 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 124:10 PM 0 2 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104:15 PM 0200 0300 0000 2020 94:20 PM 0100 0700 0000 0010 94:25 PM 0300 0300 0000 0030 94:30 PM 0200 2200 0000 0000 64:35 PM 0100 1500 0000 0000 74:40 PM 0 1 1 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 124:45 PM 0310 2100 0000 0000 74:50 PM 0210 1400 0000 1000 94:55 PM 0 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 105:00 PM 0 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 175:05 PM 0 2 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 125:10 PM 0 0 1 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 115:15 PM 0300 3200 0000 0010 95:20 PM 0110 1600 0000 0000 95:25 PM 0 3 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 16

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
HEAVY-VEHICLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 01000000000013:35 PM 00000000000003:40 PM 00000000000003:45 PM 00001000000013:50 PM 00000000000003:55 PM 00010000000014:00 PM 00000000000004:05 PM 00001000000014:10 PM 00000000000004:15 PM 00000000000004:20 PM 00000000000004:25 PM 00000000000004:30 PM 00000000000004:35 PM 00000000000004:40 PM 00000000000004:45 PM 00000000000004:50 PM 00000000000004:55 PM 00000000000005:00 PM 00000000000005:05 PM 00000000000005:10 PM 00000000000005:15 PM 00000000000005:20 PM 00000000000005:25 PM 0000000000000

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
BUS VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
PEDESTRIAN VOLUMESTime Perio South Leg North Leg West Leg East Leg Total 3:30 PM 000003:35 PM 000003:40 PM 000003:45 PM 000003:50 PM 000003:55 PM 000004:00 PM 000004:05 PM 000004:10 PM 000004:15 PM 000004:20 PM 000004:25 PM 000004:30 PM 000004:35 PM 000004:40 PM 000004:45 PM 000004:50 PM 000004:55 PM 000005:00 PM 000005:05 PM 000005:10 PM 000005:15 PM 000005:20 PM 000005:25 PM 00000

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
BICYCLE VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM 00000000000003:35 PM 00000000000003:40 PM 00000000000003:45 PM 00100000000013:50 PM 00000000000003:55 PM 00000000000004:00 PM 00000000000004:05 PM 00000000000004:10 PM 00000000000004:15 PM 00000000000004:20 PM 00000000000004:25 PM 00000000000004:30 PM 00000000000004:35 PM 00000000000004:40 PM 00000000000004:45 PM 00000000000004:50 PM 01000000000014:55 PM 00000000000005:00 PM 00001000000015:05 PM 00000000000005:10 PM 00000000000005:15 PM 00000000010015:20 PM 00000000000005:25 PM 0000000000000

16953412 - Brennan Rd -- California St
SCOOTER VOLUMESTime Perio NB Left NB Thru NB Right SB Left SB Thru SB Right EB Left EB Thru EB Right WB Left WB Thru WB Right Total 3:30 PM3:35 PM3:40 PM3:45 PM3:50 PM3:55 PM4:00 PM4:05 PM4:10 PM4:15 PM4:20 PM4:25 PM4:30 PM4:35 PM4:40 PM4:45 PM4:50 PM4:55 PM5:00 PM5:05 PM5:10 PM5:15 PM5:20 PM5:25 PM

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
ATTACHMENT 2

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 1
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 1.5 0.7 8.0 4.5 2.8 51.1 35.4 27.9 22.3 21.8 4.7 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 3.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.1 0.0 51.2 31.7 28.0 21.3 18.0 2.3 Total Stops 2 1 3 2 5 0 54 9 12 3 5 0
Stop/Veh 0.67 0.00 0.08 0.67 0.01 0.00 0.98 0.90 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.8 115.9 11.5 1.5 424.3 5.8 6.9 1.2 1.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 Travel Time (hr) 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.0 8.9 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 Avg Speed (mph) 38 51 47 39 48 45 7 9 9 15 16 26
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.0 11.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 45.9 37.3 43.0 36.5 36.9 38.9 18.9 22.4 24.8 35.8 37.7 41.1 HC Emissions (g) 0 166 14 11 642 10 3 0 3 1 0 3
CO Emissions (g) 6 4037 335 219 14315 208 114 18 51 18 3 57 NOx Emissions (g) 1 495 42 28 1941 28 8 1 6309
Vehicles Entered 3 361 36 3 825 11 55 10 12 3 4 5
Vehicles Exited 3 362 36 3 825 12 54 10 13 3 5 5
Hourly Exit Rate 3 362 36 3 825 12 54 10 13 3 5 5
Input Volume 3 359 33 4 826 11 59 8 10453
% of Volume 100 101 108 75 100 107 91 118 127 75 95 167 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh)
Occupancy (veh) 020090100000

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 2
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 2.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 6.0
Stop Delay (hr) 1.1
Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.8
Total Stops 96
Stop/Veh 0.07
Travel Dist (mi) 571.8
Travel Time (hr) 13.2
Avg Speed (mph) 44
Fuel Used (gal) 15.6
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 36.6
HC Emissions (g) 854
CO Emissions (g) 19383
NOx Emissions (g) 2562
Vehicles Entered 1328
Vehicles Exited 1331
Hourly Exit Rate 1331
Input Volume 1326
% of Volume 100
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Density (ft/veh) 467
Occupancy (veh) 13

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 3
2: Brennan Rd. & California St Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 4.7 2.7 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.4 1.1
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.8
Total Stops 5 27 0 0 1 2 35
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.06 0.27
Travel Dist (mi) 1.3 6.8 7.6 0.7 1.1 4.4 21.9
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8
Avg Speed (mph) 25 25 34 29 24 29 29
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 46.3 43.1 42.2 53.8 30.3 22.8 36.0
HC Emissions (g) 0 1 4 0 0 12 18
CO Emissions (g) 3 20 77 1 30 298 429
NOx Emissions (g) 0 2 13 0 1 34 51
Vehicles Entered 5 27 48 4 9 35 128
Vehicles Exited 5 27 48 4 8 35 127
Hourly Exit Rate 5 27 48 4 8 35 127
Input Volume 5 26 51 4 9 33 129
% of Volume 95 104 94 100 86 105 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 4524
Occupancy (veh) 0000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 4
3: Walnut Ave & California St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.0 2.8 4.7 3.5 1.6 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 1.9 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.7 2.7 2.2 2.7 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total Stops 32 16 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 Travel Dist (mi) 3.5 1.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 3.8 0.3 0.1 1.2 1.0 13.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Avg Speed (mph) 19 19 19 20 20 21 25 22 20 24 20 21
Fuel Used (gal) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 40.7 40.2 39.9 40.2 40.9 39.4 40.2 48.1 33.6 38.9 49.2 40.8 HC Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CO Emissions (g) 11 5 2 1 1 1 10 1 1 3 1 37
NOx Emissions (g) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
Vehicles Entered 32 16 6 4 3 2 44 3 2 20 16 148
Vehicles Exited 32 16 5 4 3 2 44 3 2 20 16 147
Hourly Exit Rate 32 16 5 4 3 2 44 3 2 20 16 147
Input Volume 35 16 4 4 2 2 46 3 2 20 14 148
% of Volume 91 102 125 100 150 100 96 100 100 98 116 99 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 3220
Occupancy (veh) 000000000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 5
4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3
Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 1.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 2.6 1.5 3.3 2.3 35.0 15.3 3.9
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.6
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 2.8 0.0 34.5 15.1 1.7
Total Stops 1 2 17 0 35 64 119
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.20 0.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.09
Travel Dist (mi) 189.5 5.4 10.2 245.4 2.6 4.7 457.8
Travel Time (hr) 4.1 0.1 0.3 5.6 0.5 0.5 11.1
Avg Speed (mph) 46 43 37 45 6 9 42
Fuel Used (gal) 4.6 0.1 0.2 6.9 0.1 0.2 12.1
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 41.5 47.2 41.4 35.6 18.6 27.1 37.8
HC Emissions (g) 250 1 2 372 0 0 624
CO Emissions (g) 5123 23 89 8376 16 26 13653
NOx Emissions (g) 766 5 11 1127 1 2 1912
Vehicles Entered 370 10 33 799 34 64 1310
Vehicles Exited 370 10 33 800 35 64 1312
Hourly Exit Rate 370 10 33 800 35 64 1312
Input Volume 366 10 32 801 35 68 1312
% of Volume 101 98 102 100 99 94 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 577
Occupancy (veh) 4 0 0 5 0 1 11

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 7
Intersection: 1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 45 126 176 67
Average Queue (ft) 4 8 64 9
95th Queue (ft) 24 96 151 40
Link Distance (ft) 1689 2671 621 1052
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Brennan Rd. & California St
Movement WB SB
Directions Served LR L
Maximum Queue (ft) 45 9
Average Queue (ft) 20 0
95th Queue (ft) 47 6
Link Distance (ft) 1321
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Walnut Ave & California St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 52 33 3 3
Average Queue (ft) 28700
95th Queue (ft) 48 28 3 3
Link Distance (ft) 570 712 462 270
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Condition
AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 8
Intersection: 4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 22 49 136
Average Queue (ft) 1 12 54
95th Queue (ft) 10 37 105
Link Distance (ft) 2671 1616 341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 1
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 3.7 1.6 11.6 2.4 1.5 56.0 27.6 27.7 21.4 20.1 2.2 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1.3 0.0 0.1 11.3 0.1 0.2 56.4 24.0 28.1 20.1 15.9 0.0 Total Stops 1 8 14 2 3 0 23 6 6 6 20 0
Stop/Veh 0.33 0.01 0.22 1.00 0.01 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.95 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 1.0 251.3 20.1 1.1 221.8 9.1 2.9 0.7 0.8 1.2 4.1 1.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.0 5.6 0.5 0.0 4.4 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 Avg Speed (mph) 39 46 43 37 50 48 6 10 10 16 17 29
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 6.2 0.4 0.0 6.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 44.6 40.7 47.5 39.7 36.5 40.5 18.7 26.0 25.9 35.4 37.2 45.8 HC Emissions (g) 2 283 12 0 286 14 0 0 0 0 1 4
CO Emissions (g) 45 6687 307 10 6780 311 30 8 9 7 24 61 NOx Emissions (g) 6 863 41 1 900 42 2 0 1 1 2 10
Vehicles Entered 3 785 63 2 430 17 23 6 6 6 20 9
Vehicles Exited 3 784 63 2 428 18 22 6 7 6 21 9
Hourly Exit Rate 3 784 63 2 428 18 22 6 7 6 21 9
Input Volume 4 785 63 3 433 17 21 6 6 6 20 8
% of Volume 75 100 100 67 99 104 104 100 117 100 104 112 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh)
Occupancy (veh) 050040000000

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 2
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.2
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5
Total Delay (hr) 1.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6
Stop Delay (hr) 0.6
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1.6
Total Stops 89
Stop/Veh 0.06
Travel Dist (mi) 515.9
Travel Time (hr) 11.7
Avg Speed (mph) 45
Fuel Used (gal) 13.3
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 38.6
HC Emissions (g) 603
CO Emissions (g) 14278
NOx Emissions (g) 1867
Vehicles Entered 1370
Vehicles Exited 1369
Hourly Exit Rate 1369
Input Volume 1373
% of Volume 100
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Density (ft/veh) 532
Occupancy (veh) 12

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 3
2: Brennan Rd. & California St Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 2.3 0.1 0.1 2.3 0.8 1.1
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.5 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.1 1.0
Total Stops 4 9 0 0 2 4 19
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.15
Travel Dist (mi) 0.9 2.2 4.1 0.9 3.1 7.6 18.9
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7
Avg Speed (mph) 24 26 35 29 23 29 28
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 45.3 44.2 42.2 49.5 25.2 22.9 29.4
HC Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 1 10 12
CO Emissions (g) 2 4 12 2 100 351 472
NOx Emissions (g) 0 1 2 0 5 28 37
Vehicles Entered 4 9 26 6 25 61 131
Vehicles Exited 4 9 26 6 25 61 131
Hourly Exit Rate 4 9 26 6 25 61 131
Input Volume 4 8 25 6 26 60 130
% of Volume 100 112 103 100 95 102 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 5089
Occupancy (veh) 0000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 4
3: Walnut Ave & California St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.4 3.0 5.7 3.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.7 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.9 3.0 2.6 3.2 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total Stops 15 12 8 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 Travel Dist (mi) 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 1.4 1.3 0.2 0.1 1.7 1.3 10.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 Avg Speed (mph) 19 19 19 20 20 21 25 21 19 24 21 21
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 41.2 42.9 41.5 44.3 43.7 41.3 39.5 45.6 47.7 41.2 49.9 42.5 HC Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CO Emissions (g) 4 3 3 1 0 5 4 0 0 4 2 28
NOx Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3
Vehicles Entered 15 12 8 4 2 16 15 3 2 27 22 126
Vehicles Exited 15 12 8 4 2 16 15 3 2 27 22 126
Hourly Exit Rate 15 12 8 4 2 16 15 3 2 27 22 126
Input Volume 15 11 7 5 2 16 16 2 2 28 21 126
% of Volume 98 109 114 80 100 98 92 150 100 96 104 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 3957
Occupancy (veh) 000000000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 5
4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 4.9 3.1 8.2 0.9 32.2 0.0 8.0 3.9
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 7.6 0.0 31.8 0.0 7.7 0.6
Total Stops 2 6 30 0 7 0 28 73
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.32 0.68 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.97 0.05
Travel Dist (mi) 402.3 9.5 13.4 135.5 0.5 0.1 2.1 563.4 Travel Time (hr) 9.2 0.2 0.4 2.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 13.0
Avg Speed (mph) 44 41 32 47 6 23 13 43
Fuel Used (gal) 9.6 0.2 0.3 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 13.8
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 42.0 44.8 41.3 37.6 20.1 27.3 34.4 40.8 HC Emissions (g) 423 1 2 164 0 0 0 591
CO Emissions (g) 8899 52 121 3723 3 1 10 12809
NOx Emissions (g) 1350 9 14 523001 1898
Vehicles Entered 779 18 44 441 7 2 29 1320
Vehicles Exited 780 18 43 442 7 2 28 1320
Hourly Exit Rate 780 18 43 442 7 2 28 1320
Input Volume 781 16 46 445 8 1 31 1328
% of Volume 100 111 94 99 88 200 90 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 488
Occupancy (veh) 9 0 0 3 0 0 0 13

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 7
Intersection: 1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 97 86 99 55
Average Queue (ft) 12 4 33 21
95th Queue (ft) 56 42 79 50
Link Distance (ft) 1689 2671 621 1052
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Brennan Rd. & California St
Movement WB SB
Directions Served LR L
Maximum Queue (ft) 33 19
Average Queue (ft) 11 1
95th Queue (ft) 35 10
Link Distance (ft) 1320
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Walnut Ave & California St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 48 32 12 3
Average Queue (ft) 23610
95th Queue (ft) 48 26 8 4
Link Distance (ft) 570 712 462 270
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Condition
PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 8
Intersection: 4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 30 57 65
Average Queue (ft) 4 20 25
95th Queue (ft) 19 48 56
Link Distance (ft) 2671 1616 341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 1
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 1.6 0.8 7.6 4.5 2.8 77.2 70.5 40.9 18.7 19.5 2.3 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 5.5 0.0 0.2 4.0 0.1 0.0 77.7 67.4 41.4 17.9 15.6 0.0 Total Stops 2 2 5 2 2 0 74 8 13 3 5 0
Stop/Veh 0.67 0.01 0.12 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.8 115.0 13.1 1.6 434.5 5.5 9.3 1.1 1.6 0.6 1.1 0.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 9.2 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 Avg Speed (mph) 34 51 47 40 47 45 5 5 7 17 17 29
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 39.8 37.2 42.9 36.4 37.0 40.9 14.5 15.2 20.4 37.0 37.5 45.9 HC Emissions (g) 0 168 18 12 682 11 4 0 4 1 0 2
CO Emissions (g) 9 4086 422 234 15090 220 186 20 71 16 5 36 NOx Emissions (g) 1 497 53 30 2049 29 11 1 7216
Vehicles Entered 3 359 41 3 847 11 74 9 13 3 5 4
Vehicles Exited 3 359 41 3 846 10 75 9 13 3 5 4
Hourly Exit Rate 3 359 41 3 846 10 75 9 13 3 5 4
Input Volume 3 359 38 5 827 11 74 10 12453
% of Volume 100 100 109 57 102 89 101 92 106 75 95 133
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh)
Occupancy (veh) 020090200000

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 2
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 3.3
Total Del/Veh (s) 8.5
Stop Delay (hr) 2.0
Stop Del/Veh (s) 5.3
Total Stops 116
Stop/Veh 0.08
Travel Dist (mi) 585.0
Travel Time (hr) 14.5
Avg Speed (mph) 40
Fuel Used (gal) 16.2
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 36.1
HC Emissions (g) 903
CO Emissions (g) 20393
NOx Emissions (g) 2687
Vehicles Entered 1372
Vehicles Exited 1371
Hourly Exit Rate 1371
Input Volume 1351
% of Volume 101
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Density (ft/veh) 424
Occupancy (veh) 14

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 3
2: Brennan Rd. & California St Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 2.9 0.3 0.1 1.9 0.4 1.3
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 1.0
Total Stops 6 44 0 0 1 2 53
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.05 0.34
Travel Dist (mi) 1.4 11.0 8.0 1.1 1.8 4.3 27.6
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.0
Avg Speed (mph) 25 25 34 29 24 29 28
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 41.9 43.4 41.3 51.0 25.9 23.2 36.5
HC Emissions (g) 0 1 6 0 1 13 21
CO Emissions (g) 4 31 102 3 49 302 491
NOx Emissions (g) 0 4 18 0 2 34 59
Vehicles Entered 6 44 51 7 14 36 158
Vehicles Exited 6 44 51 7 14 36 158
Hourly Exit Rate 6 44 51 7 14 36 158
Input Volume 7 44 51 6 15 34 158
% of Volume 83 101 100 112 95 104 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 3480
Occupancy (veh) 0000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 4
3: Walnut Ave & California St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.3 3.0 4.9 2.5 1.7 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 Total Stops 50 22 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 Travel Dist (mi) 5.3 2.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 4.1 0.3 0.1 1.1 1.0 16.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Avg Speed (mph) 19 19 19 20 20 21 25 22 19 24 20 20
Fuel Used (gal) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 39.4 39.5 37.8 44.9 42.2 39.7 39.8 49.2 43.5 41.4 50.4 40.6 HC Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CO Emissions (g) 19 9 3 2 1 1 10 1 0 2 2 50
NOx Emissions (g) 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
Vehicles Entered 49 22 7 6 3 2 46 4 2 18 16 175
Vehicles Exited 49 22 7 6 3 2 46 4 2 18 16 175
Hourly Exit Rate 49 22 7 6 3 2 46 4 2 18 16 175
Input Volume 46 24 6 5 2 3 46 3 2 20 18 175
% of Volume 107 92 112 114 150 67 100 133 100 90 90 100 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 2563
Occupancy (veh) 000000000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 5
4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3
Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 2.7 1.3 3.7 2.4 35.2 17.7 4.3
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.8
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 34.8 17.5 2.1
Total Stops 0 2 17 0 35 83 137
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.20 0.50 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.10
Travel Dist (mi) 189.1 5.0 10.4 251.8 2.6 6.2 465.1
Travel Time (hr) 4.1 0.1 0.3 5.7 0.5 0.7 11.5
Avg Speed (mph) 46 44 36 45 6 9 41
Fuel Used (gal) 4.6 0.1 0.2 7.1 0.1 0.2 12.4
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 41.5 45.8 42.8 35.5 18.9 26.0 37.6
HC Emissions (g) 250 1 2 394 0 0 647
CO Emissions (g) 5141 22 95 8829 14 33 14135
NOx Emissions (g) 766 5 11 1187 1 3 1973
Vehicles Entered 368 10 34 820 36 83 1351
Vehicles Exited 368 10 34 820 35 82 1349
Hourly Exit Rate 368 10 34 820 35 82 1349
Input Volume 367 10 36 802 35 79 1330
% of Volume 100 98 94 102 99 103 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 558
Occupancy (veh) 4 0 0 6 0 1 11

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 7
Intersection: 1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 73 98 258 52
Average Queue (ft) 7 5 93 10
95th Queue (ft) 40 48 215 40
Link Distance (ft) 1689 2671 621 1052
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Brennan Rd. & California St
Movement WB SB
Directions Served LR L
Maximum Queue (ft) 57 15
Average Queue (ft) 27 1
95th Queue (ft) 50 9
Link Distance (ft) 1321
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Walnut Ave & California St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 61 33 3 6
Average Queue (ft) 31800
95th Queue (ft) 52 31 3 4
Link Distance (ft) 570 712 462 270
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 8
Intersection: 4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB WB NB
Directions Served TR L T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 18 44 9 192
Average Queue (ft) 1 12 0 62
95th Queue (ft) 8 36 9 137
Link Distance (ft) 2671 1616 1616 341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 1
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 4.5 2.3 13.7 3.1 1.6 67.2 31.6 35.2 18.5 26.9 2.7 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.8 0.1 0.2 12.8 0.5 0.2 67.5 28.1 35.6 17.4 22.5 0.1 Total Stops 1 16 25 3 7 0 28 6 8 6 21 0
Stop/Veh 0.33 0.02 0.31 0.75 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.9 249.8 25.6 1.9 222.8 9.0 3.5 0.8 1.0 1.1 4.1 1.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.0 5.8 0.6 0.1 4.5 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 Avg Speed (mph) 40 45 42 35 49 48 5 9 8 17 15 28
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 6.0 0.5 0.0 6.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 45.2 41.4 48.4 40.5 36.5 39.8 16.1 23.1 20.5 34.2 34.5 41.7 HC Emissions (g) 1 275 12 0 294 16 1 0 0 0 1 5
CO Emissions (g) 22 6536 331 17 6921 351 50 13 17 7 26 77 NOx Emissions (g) 2 832 44 2 913 45 3 1 1 1 2 12
Vehicles Entered 3 780 80 4 432 17 27 7 8 6 21 10
Vehicles Exited 3 780 80 4 431 18 28 7 8 6 21 10
Hourly Exit Rate 3 780 80 4 431 18 28 7 8 6 21 10
Input Volume 4 785 80 5 433 17 26 7 7 6 20 8
% of Volume 75 99 100 80 100 104 107 97 114 100 104 125 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh)
Occupancy (veh) 061050100000

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 2
1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.2
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.6
Total Delay (hr) 2.3
Total Del/Veh (s) 5.9
Stop Delay (hr) 0.9
Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.3
Total Stops 121
Stop/Veh 0.09
Travel Dist (mi) 522.5
Travel Time (hr) 12.5
Avg Speed (mph) 43
Fuel Used (gal) 13.5
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 38.8
HC Emissions (g) 605
CO Emissions (g) 14369
NOx Emissions (g) 1858
Vehicles Entered 1395
Vehicles Exited 1396
Hourly Exit Rate 1396
Input Volume 1399
% of Volume 100
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Density (ft/veh) 501
Occupancy (veh) 12

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 3
2: Brennan Rd. & California St Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 2.6 0.1 0.1 2.2 0.7 1.3
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Stop Del/Veh (s) 3.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.5 1.4
Total Stops 5 16 0 0 4 5 30
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.08 0.18
Travel Dist (mi) 1.3 4.0 4.1 1.9 5.6 7.4 24.3
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9
Avg Speed (mph) 24 25 34 29 23 27 27
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.8
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 44.5 43.4 42.1 51.0 25.0 22.1 29.8
HC Emissions (g) 0 0 1 0 2 9 13
CO Emissions (g) 3 10 15 6 179 335 547
NOx Emissions (g) 0 1 2 1 8 27 41
Vehicles Entered 5 16 26 12 45 60 164
Vehicles Exited 5 16 26 12 45 60 164
Hourly Exit Rate 5 16 26 12 45 60 164
Input Volume 6 15 25 10 45 61 162
% of Volume 83 105 103 120 101 99 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 3763
Occupancy (veh) 0000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 4
3: Walnut Ave & California St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 5.0 3.2 5.2 3.3 1.7 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.1 2.0 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total Stops 23 20 12 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 64
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 Travel Dist (mi) 2.4 2.1 1.3 0.7 0.3 2.2 1.3 0.3 0.1 1.6 1.8 14.2 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 Avg Speed (mph) 19 19 19 20 20 21 25 22 20 24 20 20
Fuel Used (gal) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg) 41.8 40.9 40.7 45.0 46.0 39.3 39.2 44.0 47.0 40.9 50.4 42.0 HC Emissions (g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CO Emissions (g) 7 6 4 1 1 10 4 1 0 4 3 42
NOx Emissions (g) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 5
Vehicles Entered 23 20 12 5 2 25 15 3 2 26 30 163
Vehicles Exited 23 20 12 5 2 25 15 3 2 26 30 163
Hourly Exit Rate 23 20 12 5 2 25 15 3 2 26 30 163
Input Volume 21 18 11 7 2 26 16 2 2 28 30 165
% of Volume 108 110 109 71 100 95 92 150 100 91 99 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 2955
Occupancy (veh) 000000000001

SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 5
4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120) Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 3.5 10.7 0.9 33.8 0.1 11.9 4.2
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 10.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 11.7 0.9
Total Stops 3 5 41 0 7 0 36 92
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.31 0.80 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.07
Travel Dist (mi) 401.8 8.3 15.6 137.1 0.5 0.1 2.7 566.1 Travel Time (hr) 9.3 0.2 0.5 2.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 13.2
Avg Speed (mph) 43 41 29 48 6 23 11 43
Fuel Used (gal) 9.8 0.2 0.4 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.2
Fuel Eff. (mpg) 40.9 43.0 39.0 37.5 19.4 33.7 31.1 39.9 HC Emissions (g) 435 1 3 170 0 0 0 609
CO Emissions (g) 9437 53 170 3839 3 0 13 13515
NOx Emissions (g) 1378 8 17 538001 1942
Vehicles Entered 778 16 51 447 7 2 36 1337
Vehicles Exited 779 16 51 446 7 2 36 1337
Hourly Exit Rate 779 16 51 446 7 2 36 1337
Input Volume 782 16 55 447 8 1 37 1346
% of Volume 100 98 93 100 88 160 98 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density (ft/veh) 480
Occupancy (veh) 9 0 1 3 0 0 0 13

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 7
Intersection: 1: Brennan Rd. & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 101 190 108 68
Average Queue (ft) 16 12 40 23
95th Queue (ft) 59 98 91 57
Link Distance (ft) 1689 2671 621 1052
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Brennan Rd. & California St
Movement WB SB
Directions Served LR L
Maximum Queue (ft) 33 27
Average Queue (ft) 16 2
95th Queue (ft) 41 13
Link Distance (ft) 1320
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 3: Walnut Ave & California St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 54 32 28 6
Average Queue (ft) 29720
95th Queue (ft) 49 27 14 5
Link Distance (ft) 570 712 462 270
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)

Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour
Murphy Ranch Subdivision Development SimTraffic 12 Report Fehr & Peers Page 8
Intersection: 4: Walnut Ave & Yosemite Ave (SR 120)
Movement EB WB NB
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 44 68 88
Average Queue (ft) 5 25 31
95th Queue (ft) 23 56 68
Link Distance (ft) 2671 1616 341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0

Project Murphy Ranch
Major Street SR 120 Scenario Existing
Minor Street Brennan Road Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 59 4 3 4 North/South
Through 8 5 359 821 x East/West
Right 10 3 33 11
Total 77 12 395 836
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met SR 120 Brennan Road * Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1,231 77
11 YES
Number of Approach Lanes
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3B, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR
ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET
100*
75*
* Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
FEHR,f PEERS

Project Murphy Ranch
Major Street SR 120 Scenario Existing
Minor Street Brennan Road Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 21 6 4 3 North/South
Through 6 20 785 433 x East/West
Right 6 8 63 17
Total 33 34 852 453
Major Street Minor Street Warrant Met SR 120 Brennan Road * Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1,305 34
11 NO
Number of Approach Lanes
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3B, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR
ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET
100*
75*
* Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
FEHR,f PEERS

John Pronoitis, Florsheim Homes
Revised April 15, 2025

343 E Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148
www.fehrandpeers.com
ATTACHMENT 3

Escalon Police Department Traffic Summary
Location:

Dates: From: 12/6/2024 To: 14
% of traffic % of speeders % of traffic % of speeders
541 24.07% 289 15.14%
432 19.22% 79.85% 261 13.67% 90.31%
97 4.31% 17.93% 25 1.31% 8.65%
12 0.53% 2.22% 3 0.16% 1.04%
4,157
594
65 13
13 14
6 to 16 MPH
% of traffic % of speeders
830 19.97%
693 16.67% 83.49%
122 2.93% 14.70%
15 0.36% 1.81%
321 Daily Average 273
12/20/2024

98.19%
21 16 to 25 MPH
2,248
111
21 21
23 16 to 25
Total Vehicles
Maximum Speed
Average Speed
Median Speed
85th Percentile Speed
Days of Study:

California Street between Brennan & Reisling
** 10 MPH Pace = The speeds between which the majority of traffic is traveling * 85th Percentile Speed = 85% of vehicles are traveling at or under this speed 1,909
116
19 19
1 to 5 MPH Over
6 to 10 MPH Over
11+ Over
10 MPH Pace
Westbound Traffic (12/6/24 - 12/13/2024) Eastbound Traffic (12/13/2024 - 12/20/2024) Maximum Speed
Average Speed
Median Speed
85th Percentile Speed
Total Speeders
10 MPH Pace
Total Speeders
1 to 5 MPH Over
6 to 10 MPH Over
11+ Over
Total Vehicles
ALL Traffic
Total Speeders
1 to 5 MPH Over
6 to 10 MPH Over
11+ Over
10 MPH Pace
Daily Average
Total Vehicles
Maximum Speed
Average Speed
Median Speed
85th Percentile Speed
Daily Average
The radar trailer was placed on California Street abetween Brennan Road and Reisling Way for a total of 14 days. It was first placed on California Street west of Celivo Way to capture westbound traffic for a week and then moved to California Street east of Chelestina Lane to capture eastbound traffic for a week.

In a two week period, 4,157 vehicles passed through the area, an average of 594 vehicles per day. Of those, 19.97% (830 vehicles) were traveling above the posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Of the vehicles speeding, 83.49% (16.67% of total traffic) were traveling between 1 and 5 miles per hour over the posted speed limit, 14.70% of speeders (2.93% of total traffic) were traveling between 6 to 10 mph over the posted speed limit, and only 1.81% of speeders (0.36% of total traffic) was traveling 11 mph or more above the posted speed limit.

Of the speeding vehicles, three were traveling in excess of 100 mph. 12/6/24 (Friday) between 1700 hours and 2300 hours, 12/8/24(Sunday) between 1700 hours and 2300 hours, and 12/18/24 (Wednesday) between 1600 hours and 2200 hours.

APPENDIX H
TRIBAL CONSULTATION RESOURCES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

January 12, 2024
Diana Trejo
City of Escalon
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: General Plan Amendment - Housing Element Update Project, San Joaquin County Dear Ms. Trejo:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Pricilla Torres-Fuentes
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

VICE-CHAIRPERSON
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

COMMISSIONER
Laurena Bolden
Serrano

COMMISSIONER
Reid Milanovich
Cahuilla

COMMISSIONER
Vacant

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok, Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

CITY OF ESCALON

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
2060 McHenry Avenue ▪ Escalon, California 95320 ▪ Office 209.691-7422 Fax 209.691-7439 April 26, 2024
Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians
Rhonda Morningstar-Pope, Chairperson
1418 20th Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, Ca. 95811
RE: AB 52 Tribal Cultural Resource Consultation, Murphy Ranch Specific Plan Dear Cultural Preservation Department,
The City of Escalon is considering approval of the approval of a Specific Plan to guide the development of two parcels, totaling 17.98 acres, which are proposed to be subdivided into 73 lots for single-family residential development. The project site is in unincorporated San Joaquin County adjacent to the western city limits of Escalon (see attached figures).

Your tribe has been identified as a possible interested party in this project by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in a letter related to a separate Escalon project dated January 12, 2024 (copy attached).

California Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) requires that CEQ Lead Agencies notify tribes that have requested AB52 notification of any project that the tribe may request consultation. No known tribes have requested notification from the City of Escalon. The City has, however, decided to provide this notification to potentially-interested tribes identified by the NAHC.

The City of Escalon is the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed project and hereby provides the tribe with notice. The tribe has 30 days from receipt of this letter to indicate if it wishes to consult on this project. If no response is received, it will be assumed that the tribe declines consultation.

Attached is a record search obtained from the Central California Information Center (CCIC) indicating there are no recorded resources of known sensitivity on or near the project site.

If the tribe desires to consult on this project, please send a written response to Diana Trejo, Assistant Planner, City of Escalon, 2060 McHenry Avenue, Escalon, CA 95320. In your response, please designate the lead contact person for this consultation, along with contact information. If you have any questions, please contact me at (209) 691- 7422.

Sincerely,
Diana Trejo, Assistant Planner, City of Escalon
• Location Map
• CCIC Report
• NAHC Letter (Escalon Project)

BaseCamp
Figure 1-3
BaseCamp Environmental USGS MAP

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: USGS Quadrangle Map, Avena CA , 2021
c:::s r-,, - ]:-
!E
:!Ji
~
r'\ 0,
irr, :,;j, 11"1'1 i:::i,
31 ::I:,
;.t)
0 S1 ~
::,.,
-.:i:;
~
~ - ...
~ •
6 ULL.REY AVE

CLOUG, AVE

Date: 8/10/2023 Records Search File #: 12627L
Project: Murphy Ranch, T2S R9E NW ¼
Section 5, APNs 225-040-28 & 225-040-29
Krista Simpson Invoice to: [email protected]
BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 West Lodi Ave.

Lodi, CA 95240
209-224-8213 [email protected]
Dear Ms. Simpson:

We have conducted a non-confidential extended records search as per your request for the abovereferenced project area located on the Avena USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map in San Joaquin County.

Search of our files includes review of our maps for the specific project area and the immediate vicinity of the project area, and review of the following:

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)
California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976)
California Historical Landmarks
California Points of Historical Interest listing
Office of Historic Preservation Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) and the Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD)
Survey of Surveys (1989)
Caltrans State and Local Bridges Inventory
General Land Office Plats
Other pertinent historic data available at the CCaIC for each specific county The following details the results of the records search:

Prehistoric or historic resources within the project area:
• There are no formally recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological resources or historic buildings or structures within the project area.
• The General Land Office survey plat for T2S R9E (dated 1854) shows the NW ¼ of Section 5 divided into two parcels: 80.7 acres in the north half and 80 acres in the south half.

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA INFORMATION CENTER
California Historical Resources Information System
Department of Anthropology – California State University, Stanislaus One University Circle, Turlock, California 95382
(209) 667-3307
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Alpine, Calaveras, Mariposa, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus & Tuolumne Counties

• The General Land Office survey plat for T2S R9E (dated 1873) shows the NW ¼ of Section 5 divided into three parcels. The north half shows 40.39 acres on the west and

40.37 acres on the east, with 80 acres on the south half. • The Map of the County of San Joaquin, California (1883) shows Brennan Avenue and French Camp Road (aka SR 120/Yosemite Avenue), with John W. Jones the landowner in Section 5, T2S R9E at that time.
• The 1914 edition of the Avena USGS quadrangle references the railroad, Brennan Road, and French Camp Road/SR 120 alignments.
• The 1952 edition of the Avena USGS quadrangle also references two buildings within the project that would be 71 years in age (or older), considered as possible historical resources. We have no further information on file regarding these buildings.

Prehistoric or historic resources within the immediate vicinity of the project area: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Resources that are known to have value to local cultural groups: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Previous investigations within the project area: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Recommendations/Comments:

Please be advised that a historical resource is defined as a building, structure, object, prehistoric or historic archaeological site, or district possessing physical evidence of human activities over 45 years old. Since the project area has not been subject to previous investigations, there may be unidentified features involved in your project that are 45 years or older and considered as historical resources requiring further study and evaluation by a qualified professional of the appropriate discipline.

If the current project does not include ground disturbance, further study for archaeological resources is not recommended at this time. If ground disturbance is considered a part of the current project, we recommend further review for the possibility of identifying prehistoric or historic-era archaeological resources.

If the proposed project contains buildings or structures that meet the minimum age requirement (45 years in age or older) it is recommended that the resource/s be assessed by a professional familiar with architecture and history of the county. Review of the available historic

building/structure data has included only those sources listed above and should not be considered comprehensive.

If at any time you might require the services of a qualified professional the Statewide Referral List for Historical Resources Consultants is posted for your use on the internet at http://chrisinfo.org
If archaeological resources are encountered during project-related activities, work should be temporarily halted in the vicinity of the discovered materials and workers should avoid altering the materials and their context until a qualified professional archaeologist has evaluated the situation and provided appropriate recommendations. Project personnel should not collect cultural resources.

If human remains are discovered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires you to protect the discovery and notify the county coroner, who will determine if the find is Native American. If the remains are recognized as Native American, the coroner shall then notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 authorizes the NAHC to appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) who will make recommendations for the treatment of the discovery.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public.

Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

We thank you for contacting this office regarding historical resource preservation. Please let us know when we can be of further service. Thank you for sending the Access Agreement Short Form.

Note: Billing will be transmitted separately via email from the Financial Services office ($150.00), payable within 60 days of receipt of the invoice.

If you wish to include payment by Credit Card, you must wait to receive the official invoice from Financial Services so that you can reference the CMP # (Invoice Number), and then contact the link below:
https://commerce.cashnet.com/ANTHROPOLOGY
Sincerely,
E. A. Greathouse E. A. Greathouse, Coordinator
Central California Information Center
California Historical Resources Information System
* Invoice Request sent to: [email protected], CSU Stanislaus Financial Services

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

January 12, 2024
Diana Trejo
City of Escalon
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: General Plan Amendment - Housing Element Update Project, San Joaquin County Dear Ms. Trejo:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Pricilla Torres-Fuentes
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

VICE-CHAIRPERSON
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

COMMISSIONER
Laurena Bolden
Serrano

COMMISSIONER
Reid Milanovich
Cahuilla

COMMISSIONER
Vacant

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok, Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

CJTYOF

ESCALON
2060 McHenry Avenue
Escafon, CA 95320
Buena Vista Rancheria of MirWuk Indians
Rhonda Moming~tar-Pope, Chairperson
1418 201~ Street, Suite 200
~ramento, Ct. 95811
II 0~¢,tSPO.s>~
l,iJ ~-, i ;......_..--.,:;;:;' :) PITN!Y DOW •
02 1P 00 .640
000093 85.0 AP . 26 202•
. AILED F O ZIP CODE 5320

CITY OF ESCALON

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
2060 McHenry Avenue ▪ Escalon, California 95320 ▪ Office 209.691-7422 Fax 209.691-7439 April 26, 2024
California Valley Miwok Tribe
14807 Avenida Central
La Grange, Ca. 95329
RE: AB 52 Tribal Cultural Resource Consultation, Murphy Ranch Specific Plan Dear Cultural Preservation Department,
The City of Escalon is considering approval of the approval of a Specific Plan to guide the development of two parcels, totaling 17.98 acres, which are proposed to be subdivided into 73 lots for single-family residential development. The project site is in unincorporated San Joaquin County adjacent to the western city limits of Escalon (see attached figures).

Your tribe has been identified as a possible interested party in this project by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in a letter related to a separate Escalon project dated January 12, 2024 (copy attached).

California Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) requires that CEQ Lead Agencies notify tribes that have requested AB52 notification of any project that the tribe may request consultation. No known tribes have requested notification from the City of Escalon. The City has, however, decided to provide this notification to potentiallyinterested tribes identified by the NAHC.

The City of Escalon is the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed project and hereby provides the tribe with notice. The tribe has 30 days from receipt of this letter to indicate if it wishes to consult on this project. If no response is received, it will be assumed that the tribe declines consultation.

Attached is a record search obtained from the Central California Information Center (CCIC) indicating there are no recorded resources of known sensitivity on or near the project site.

If the tribe desires to consult on this project, please send a written response to Diana Trejo, Assistant Planner, City of Escalon, 2060 McHenry Avenue, Escalon, CA 95320. In your response, please designate the lead contact person for this consultation, along with contact information. If you have any questions, please contact me at (209) 691-7422.

Sincerely,
Diana Trejo, Assistant Planner, City of Escalon
• Location Map
• CCIC Report
• NAHC Letter (Escalon Project)

BaseCamp
Figure 1-3
BaseCamp Environmental USGS MAP

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: USGS Quadrangle Map, Avena CA , 2021
c:::s r-,, - ]:-
!E
:!Ji
~
r'\ 0,
irr, :,;j, 11"1'1 i:::i,
31 ::I:,
;.t)
0 S1 ~
::,.,
-.:i:;
~
~ - ...
~ •
6 ULL.REY AVE

CLOUG, AVE

Date: 8/10/2023 Records Search File #: 12627L
Project: Murphy Ranch, T2S R9E NW ¼
Section 5, APNs 225-040-28 & 225-040-29
Krista Simpson Invoice to: [email protected]
BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 West Lodi Ave.

Lodi, CA 95240
209-224-8213 [email protected]
Dear Ms. Simpson:

We have conducted a non-confidential extended records search as per your request for the abovereferenced project area located on the Avena USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map in San Joaquin County.

Search of our files includes review of our maps for the specific project area and the immediate vicinity of the project area, and review of the following:

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)
California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976)
California Historical Landmarks
California Points of Historical Interest listing
Office of Historic Preservation Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) and the Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD)
Survey of Surveys (1989)
Caltrans State and Local Bridges Inventory
General Land Office Plats
Other pertinent historic data available at the CCaIC for each specific county The following details the results of the records search:

Prehistoric or historic resources within the project area:
• There are no formally recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological resources or historic buildings or structures within the project area.
• The General Land Office survey plat for T2S R9E (dated 1854) shows the NW ¼ of Section 5 divided into two parcels: 80.7 acres in the north half and 80 acres in the south half.

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA INFORMATION CENTER
California Historical Resources Information System
Department of Anthropology – California State University, Stanislaus One University Circle, Turlock, California 95382
(209) 667-3307
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Alpine, Calaveras, Mariposa, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus & Tuolumne Counties

• The General Land Office survey plat for T2S R9E (dated 1873) shows the NW ¼ of Section 5 divided into three parcels. The north half shows 40.39 acres on the west and

40.37 acres on the east, with 80 acres on the south half. • The Map of the County of San Joaquin, California (1883) shows Brennan Avenue and French Camp Road (aka SR 120/Yosemite Avenue), with John W. Jones the landowner in Section 5, T2S R9E at that time.
• The 1914 edition of the Avena USGS quadrangle references the railroad, Brennan Road, and French Camp Road/SR 120 alignments.
• The 1952 edition of the Avena USGS quadrangle also references two buildings within the project that would be 71 years in age (or older), considered as possible historical resources. We have no further information on file regarding these buildings.

Prehistoric or historic resources within the immediate vicinity of the project area: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Resources that are known to have value to local cultural groups: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Previous investigations within the project area: None has been formally reported to the Information Center.

Recommendations/Comments:

Please be advised that a historical resource is defined as a building, structure, object, prehistoric or historic archaeological site, or district possessing physical evidence of human activities over 45 years old. Since the project area has not been subject to previous investigations, there may be unidentified features involved in your project that are 45 years or older and considered as historical resources requiring further study and evaluation by a qualified professional of the appropriate discipline.

If the current project does not include ground disturbance, further study for archaeological resources is not recommended at this time. If ground disturbance is considered a part of the current project, we recommend further review for the possibility of identifying prehistoric or historic-era archaeological resources.

If the proposed project contains buildings or structures that meet the minimum age requirement (45 years in age or older) it is recommended that the resource/s be assessed by a professional familiar with architecture and history of the county. Review of the available historic