Escondido City Council
January 12, 2022

City of Escondido
Council Meeting Agenda
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2022
4:00 PM - Closed Session (CANCELLED)
5:00 PM - Regular Session
Escondido City Council Chambers, 201 North Broadway, Escondido, CA 92025

WELCOME TO YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
We welcome your interest and involvement in the legislative process of Escondido. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by City staff.

MAYOR
Paul McNamara

DEPUTY MAYOR
Tina Inscoe (District 2)

COUNCILMEMBERS
Consuelo Martinez (District 1)
Joe Garcia (District 3)
Michael Morasco (District 4)

CITY MANAGER
Sean McGlynn

CITY ATTORNEY
Michael McGuinness

CITY CLERK
Zack Beck

HOW TO WATCH
The City of Escondido provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person On TV Online
201 N. Broadway Cox Cable Channel 19 and U-verse Channel 99 www.escondido.org 1 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

HOW TO PARTICIPATE
The City of Escondido provides two ways to communicate with the City Council during a meeting:

In Person In Writing
Fill out Speaker Slip and Submit to City Clerk https://escondido-ca.municodemeetings.com/

ASSISTANCE PROVIDED
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact our ADA Coordinator at 760-839-4643.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable to city to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired – please see the City Clerk. 2 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

CLOSED SESSION
(CANCELLED)

CALL TO ORDER

1. Roll Call: Garcia, Inscoe, Martinez, Morasco, McNamara

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
In addition to speaking during particular agenda items, the public may address the Council on any item which is not on the agenda provided the item is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on such items, but the matter may be referred to the City Manager/staff or scheduled on a subsequent agenda. Speakers are limited to only one opportunity to address the Council under Oral Communications.

CLOSED SESSION

1. Conference with legal counsel-anticipated litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(4)) a. One matter

ADJOURNMENT
3 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

REGULAR SESSION
5:00 PM Regular Session

MOMENT OF REFLECTION
City Council agendas allow an opportunity for a moment of silence and reflection at the beginning of the evening meeting. The City does not participate in the selection of speakers for this portion of the agenda, and does not endorse or sanction any remarks made by individuals during this time. If you wish to be recognized during th is portion of the agenda, please notify the City Clerk in advance.

FLAG SALUTE
The City Council conducts the Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of every City Council meeting.

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call: Garcia, Inscoe, Martinez, Morasco, McNamara

PRESENTATIONS
CCAE Annual Report

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
In addition to speaking during particular agenda items, the public may address the Council on any item which is not on the agenda provided the item is within the subject matter jurisdicti on of the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on such items, but the matter may be referred to the City Manager/staff or scheduled on a subsequent agenda. Speakers are limited to only one opportunity to address t he Council under Oral Communications.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are not discussed individually and are approved in a single motion. However, Council members always have the option to have an item considered separately, either on their own request or at the request of staff or a member of the public.

1. AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION, MAILING, AND POSTING (COUNCIL/RRB) - 4 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

2. APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER (COUNCIL)
Request the City Council approve the City Council and Housing Successor Agency warrant numbers:
a. 358748 – 358973 dated December 8, 2021
b. 358974 – 359136 dated December 15, 2021
c. 359137 – 359366 dated December 22, 2021
d. 359367 – 359553 dated December 29, 2021
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance Department: Christina Holmes)

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of December 15, 2021

4. CALIFORNIA WATER AND WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PROGRAM -
Request the City Council approve authorizing participation in the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program (“CWWAPP”) and authorizing the Deputy City Manager / Director of Utilities or his designee to accept and expend these funds on behalf of the City of Escondido (“City”).

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance: Christina Holmes) a. Resolution No. 2022-09

5. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ESCONDIDO CREEK TRAIL TRANSIT CENTER BIKE

PATH IMPROVEMENTS AT QUINCE AND TULIP STREETS -
Request the City Council approve awarding the construction contract to PAL General Engineering Inc., determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $747,000. Resolution 2022-06 authorizes the Mayor to execute a Public Improvement Agreement in the amount of $549,689.00 for the Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bike Path Improvements at Quince and Tulip Streets (“Project”).

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Engineering Services Department: Julie Procopio) a. Resolution No. 2022-06

5 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

6. PURCHASE TWENTY-FIVE (25) 2022 FORD HYBRID INTERCEPTOR UTILITY VEHICLES – Request the City Council approve authorizing the Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department to purchase twenty-five (25) Ford Hybrid Police Interceptor Utility Vehicles from Downtown Ford Sales of Sacramento, California, in the amount of $1,107,211.13 by attaching to the City of Sacramento’s purchase contract No. B19153311005, and approving the disposal of the surplus vehicles via auction.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Public Works Department: Joseph Goulart) a. Resolution No. 2022-15

7. AMBULANCE GURNEY PURCHASE -
Request the City Council approve taking the following actions: 1. Accept the lowest responsive bid from Ferno to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys; 2. Authorize the Fire Department to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys from Ferno in the amount of $229,447.12.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Fire Department: Rick Vogt) a. Resolution No. 2022-16

8. CITY OF ESCONDIDO LETTER OF SUPPORT TO CALTRANS FOR A SOUND ATTENUATING WALL BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND EL KU AVENUE -
Request the City Council approve authorizing the Mayor to execute, on behalf of the City, a letter to the District 11 Office of the California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) supporting the design and construction of a sound attenuating wall between Interstate 15 and residences along El Ku Avenue in southern Escondido.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (City Manager’s Office: Christopher W. McKinney)

9. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN PASQUAL UNDERGROUNDING

PROJECT -
Request the City Council approve authorizing the Mayor to execute a Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement with the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Utilities Department: Christopher W. McKinney) a. Resolution No. 2022-17

6 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

CONSENT RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (COUNCIL/RRB)
The following Resolutions and Ordinances were heard and acted upon by the City Council/RRB at a previous City Council/Mobilehome Rent Review meeting. (The title of Ordinances listed on the Consent Calendar are deemed to have been read and further reading waived.)

CURRENT BUSINESS

10. PARK AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE -
Request the City Council receive and file an update on the programs and activities at the Park Avenue Community Center, home of the Escondido Senior Center.

Staff Recommendation: Receive and File (Community Services Department: Joanna Axelrod)

11. AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 32, SUBDIVISIONS - Request the City Council approve amending Chapter 32, Subdivisions, of the Escondido Municipal Code to clarify and streamline the approval process for final maps in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Engineering Services Department: Julie Procopio) a. Ordinance No. 2022-02 (First Reading and Introduction)

12. COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON, CHANGE TO CITY OF ESCONDIDO

SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPRESENTATIVE -
On December 15, 2021, Councilmember Michael Morasco requested an agenda item to discuss options for, and possible action on, a change to the City of Escondido's designated representative on the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board of Directors.

Staff Recommendation: Discussion (Councilmember Michael Morasco)

FUTURE AGENDA

13. FUTURE AGENDA
The purpose of this item is to identify issues presently known to staff or which members of the City Council wish to place on an upcoming City Council agenda. Council comment on these future agenda items is limited by California Government Code Section 54954.2 to clarifying questions, brief announcements, or requests for factual information in connection with an item when it is discussed.

Staff Recommendation: None (City Clerk's Office: Zack Beck)

7 Wednesday, January 12, 2022

COUNCILMEMBERS SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND OTHER REPORTS
CITY MANAGER’S WEEKLY ACTIVITY REPORT
The most current information from the City Manager regarding Economic Development, Capital Improvement Projects, Public Safety, and Community Development. This report is also available on the City’s website, www.escondido.org.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
In addition to speaking during particular agenda items, the public may address the Council on any item which is not on the agenda provided the item is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on such items, but the matter may be referred to the City Manager/staff or scheduled on a subsequent agenda. Speakers are limited to only one opportunity to address the Council under Oral Communications.

ADJOURNMENT

UPCOMING MEETING SCHEDULE
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 4:00 & 5:00 PM Regular Meeting, Council Chambers Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:00 & 5:00 PM Regular Meeting, Council Chambers

SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Members of the Escondido City Council also sit as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission, Escondido Joint Powers Financing Authority, and the Mobilehome Rent Review Board.

8 Consent Item No. 1 January 12, 2022

A F F I D A V I T S

OF

I T E M

P O S T I N G
9 Item 1.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0400-40

SUBJECT

APPROVAL OF WARRANTS

DEPARTMENT
Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION
Request approval for City Council and Housing Successor Agency warrant numbers:
358748 – 358973 dated December 8, 2021
358974 – 359136 dated December 15, 2021
359137 – 359366 dated December 22, 2021
359367 – 359553 dated December 29, 2021
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance Department: Christina Holmes)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The total amount of the warrants for the following periods are as follows:

December 2 – December 8, 2021, is $ 4,253,846.20
December 9 – December 15, 2021, is $ 1,215,203.76
December 16 – December 22, 2021, is $ 1,029,849.45
December 23 – December 29, 2021, is $ 3,117,858.44

BACKGROUND
The Escondido Municipal Code Section 10-49 states that warrants or checks may be issued and paid prior to audit by the City Council, provided the warrants or checks are certified and approved by the Director of Finance as conforming to the current budget. These warrants or checks must then be ratified and approved by the City Council at the next regular Council meeting.

10 Item 2.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 1 of 7

CLOSED SESSION
December 15, 2021 at 4:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

1. Roll Call: Garcia, Inscoe, Martinez, Morasco, McNamara

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.

CLOSED SESSION

1. Conference with real property negotiator (Government Code §54956.8) a. Property: 272 E. Via Rancho Pkwy, Escondido
b. City Negotiator: Sean McGlynn, City Manager, or designee c. Negotiating Party: Larry Green, L. Green Investment & Development, LLC d. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Lease

ADJOURNMENT

Mayor McNamara adjourned the meeting at 4:35 p.m.

______________________________ _______________________________

MAYOR CITY CLERK

11 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 2 of 7

REGULAR SESSION
December 15, 2021 at 5:00 PM

MOMENT OF REFLECTION
Zack Beck, City Clerk

FLAG SALUTE
Michael Morasco, Deputy Mayor

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call: Garcia, Inscoe, Martinez, Morasco, McNamara

PROCLAMATION
National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, December, 2021

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
None.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Yussef Miller - Encouraged City Council to involve the community in the Housing element.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve all consent calendar items: Morasco; Second: Garcia; Vote: Approved 5-0

1. AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION, MAILING AND POSTING (COUNCIL/RRB)

2. APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER (COUNCIL) -
Request the City Council approve the City Council and Housing Successor Agency warrant numbers:
a. 358428 - 358623 dated November 23, 2021
b. 358624 - 358747 dated December 1, 2021
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance Department: Christina Holmes) 12 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 3 of 7

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of December 1, 2021

4. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2021-167 APPROVING RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (“ROPS22-23”) FOR JULY 2022 THRU JUNE 2023 -
Request the City Council approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 22-23) so that the Successor Agency may continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations. (File No. 0440-35)
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance Department: Christina Holmes) a. Resolution No. 2021-167

5. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ON CAPITAL FUNDS FUNDED BY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006 -
Request the City Council receive and file the annual and five-year Reports on Capital Funds Funded by Developer Fees for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021. (File No. 0400-93) Staff Recommendation: Receive and File (Finance Department: Christina Holmes)

6. CONVERSION OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR THE FINANCING OF WINDSOR GARDENS

APARTMENTS -
Request the City Council approve the conversion of tax-exempt bonds used for the financing of Windsor Gardens Apartments to a City-owned seller-carryback loan. (File No. 0440-20) Staff Recommendation: Approval (Community Development Department: Adam Finestone) a. Resolution No. 2021-184

7. FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT FOR THE LAKE WOHLFORD DAM

REPLACEMENT PROJECT -
Request the City Council approve authorizing the Mayor to execute a Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for the Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project. (File No. 0600-10, A-3060)
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Utilities Department: Christopher McKinney) a. Resolution No. 2021-188

CONSENT RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (COUNCIL/RRB)
The following Resolutions and Ordinances were he ard and acted upon by the City Council/RRB at a previous City Council/Mobilehome Rent Review meeting. (The title of Ordinances listed on the Consent Calendar are deemed to have been read and further reading waived.) 13 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 4 of 7

8. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE MUNICPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING - Approved on December 1, 2021 with a vote of 5/0.
a. Ordinance No. 2021-15 (Second Reading and Adoption)

9. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE MUNICPAL CODE PERTAINING TO WASTEWATERS, STORMWATERS, AND

RELATED MATTERS -
Approved on December 1, 2021 with a vote of 5/0.
a. Ordinance No. 2021-16 (Second Reading and Adoption)

PUBLIC HEARINGS

10. TEFRA HEARING FOR HERITAGE PARK APARTMENTS AND APPROVAL OF ASSUMPTION

OF REGULATORY AGREEMENT -
Request the City Council approve the issuance of up to $68,000,000 in revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”) for the purchase and renovation of Heritage Park Escondido at 2549 E Valley Pkwy and approval of the assumption of an existing Regulatory Agreement by the new owners. (File No. 0440-65) Staff Recommendation: Approval (Community Development Department: Adam Finestone) a. Resolution No. 2021-185
b. Resolution No. 2021-189
Motion: Inscoe; Second: Morasco; Approved: 5-0

CURRENT BUSINESS

11. UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE SCHEDULE, SALARY PLANS, AND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - Request the City Council approve to amend and re-establish the salary schedule for the Unclassified and Management groups and the Part-Time Hourly Compensation Plan. (File No. 0720-20)
Staff Recommendation: Approval (Human Resources Department: Jessica Perpetua) a. Resolution No. 2021-172
b. Resolution No. 2021-173
14 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7

Motion: Martinez; Second: Garcia; Approved: 5-0

12. APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY MAYOR -
Request the City Council approve to appoint Councilmember Tina Inscoe to serve as Deputy Mayor in accordance with Ordinance No. 2020-28. (File No. 0610-70) Staff Recommendation: Approval (City Clerk's Office: Zack Beck) Motion: Garcia; Second: Inscoe; Approved: 5-0

13. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS POLICY UPDATE -
Request the City Council approve recommendations from the Boards and Commissions Subcommittee. (File No. 0610-90)
Staff Recommendations: Approval (City Clerk's Office: Zack Beck) a. Ordinance No. 2021-14 (First Reading and Introduction) Laura Hunter – Requested that the City Council form a Climate Action Commission.

Motion: Martinez; Second: McNamara; Approved: 5-0

14. REVENUE MEASURE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT -
Request the City Council receive and file an update from the Revenue Measure Subcommittee.

Staff Recommendation: Receive and File (Councilmembers: Mayor Paul McNamara and Deputy Mayor Michael Morasco)
Patricia Borchmann – Expressed support for this item.

No action required by Council.

15. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER AND MAYOR COMPENSATION -
Request the City Council consider approval of Ordinance No. 2021-13 amending Section 2- 28(a) of the Escondido Municipal Code to increase the salary for the City Councilmembers and Mayor up to five percent per year from effective date of the last approved increase, all effective on the date the City officials elected in 2022 are sworn into office. (File No. 0610-90) Staff Recommendation: Consider for Approval (City Attorney's Office: Michael McGuinness) a. Ordinance No. 2021-13 (First Reading and Introduction) Ed Gallo – Expressed opposition to this item.
15 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7

Motion to increase Mayor and City Council salaries by 5% starting in December 2022:

Morasco; Second: Inscoe; Failed: 2-3 (McNamara, Martinez, Garcia - No)

FUTURE AGENDA

16. FUTURE AGENDA
The purpose of this item is to identify issues presently known to staff or which members of the City Council wish to place on an upcoming City Council agenda. Council comment on these future agenda items is limited by California Government Code Section 54954.2 to clarifying questions, brief announcements, or requests for factual information in connection with an item when it is discussed.

Staff Recommendation: None (City Clerk's Office: Zack Beck) Morasco – Review of SANDAG appointment.

COUNCILMEMBERS SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND OTHER REPORTS
Inscoe - Will be sworn into the Clean Energy Alliance Board.

Morasco - Attended the Community in Unity event hosted by the Escondido Chamber of Commerce.

Attended a Revenue Measure Subcommittee Meeting.

Garcia - Attended the Community in Unity event hosted by the Escondido Chamber of Commerce. Met Mark Murrows, Superintendent of the San Pasqual Union School District. Thanked Police Chief Varso and City Manager McGlynn for interacting with the community. Thanked Public Works for removing graffiti throughout the City.

Martinez - Attended an Air Pollution Control District Board Meeting.

McNamara - Attended the Community in Unity event hosted by the Escondido Chamber of Commerce.

Attended a Community Advisory Group Meeting on Homelessness.

CITY MANAGER’S WEEKLY ACTIVITY REPORT
The most current in formation from the City Manager regarding Economic Development, Capital Improvement Projects, Public Safety, and Community Development. This report is also available on the City’s website, www.escondido.org.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
16 Item 3.

December 15, 2021 Escondido City Council Minutes Page 7 of 7

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor McNamara adjourned the meeting at 6:34 p.m.

______________________________ _______________________________

MAYOR CITY CLERK

17 Item 3.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0480-85

SUBJECT

CALIFORNIA WATER AND WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT
Finance

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council approve Resolution No. 2022 -09 authorizing participation in the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program ( “CWWAPP”) and authorizing the Deputy City Manager / Director of Utilities or his designee to accept and expend these funds on behalf of the City of Escondido (“City”).

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Finance: Christina Holmes)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The State of California is funding this temporary program with Federal COVID-19 relief funds and requires Escondido to apply to the State Water Re sources Control Board on behalf of the City’s water and wastewater residential and commercial customers with past -due balances accrued between March 4, 2020, and June 15, 2021.

The funding the City receives will be applied to customer accounts to reduce or eliminate their past due balances, assisting those customers with balances that will result in disconnection of services due to non- payment or are turned over for collections. In addition, the reduction/elimination of the eligible past due balances will reduce the potential of bad utility debt that the City would need to pursue or write-off.

PREVIOUS ACTION
None.

BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2020, at the outset of the COVID -19 pandemic, Governor Newsom enacted Stay -At-Home Orders for those not providing essential services to slow the spread of the virus. Additionally, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N -42-20 prohibiting the discontinuation of water service due to non - payment indefinitely. In compliance with this order and recognizing the financial hardship that Escondido residents faced, the City suspended all past due fees and disconnections for non-payment for water and wastewater utilities.
18 Item 4.

The stay at home order was rescinded on June 11, 2021 by Executive Order N-07-21 and many provisions of other Executive Orders were phased out by Executive Order N-08-21, including establishing an end date for the shutoff moratorium of September 30, 2021; however, in September the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law SB 155 extending the prohibition on the disconnection of water service until December 31, 2021.

In November 2020, the State Water Resources Control Board (“Water Board”) conducted a survey of the debt accruing due to the shut -off moratorium. Based on the survey results, it is estimated that there is approximately $1 billion in unpaid water utility bills statewide. As a result, the California State Legislature provided t he Water Board with approximately $985 million, from Federal COVID -19 relief funds, to implement the CWWAPP. This new program is designed to help water and wastewater utility customers address past-due bills (arrearages) accumulated from March 4, 2020, th rough June 15, 2021, which is defined as the “COVID-19 billing relief period.” The relief period dates are consistent with the Governor's Executive Orders N-33-20 and N-07-21 which established the beginning and end of the statewide stay-at- home order, respectively.

Of the funding provided by the State Legislature, water utilities have been given first priority to receive funding. The Water Board must expend all funds no later than January 31, 2022 and the City must apply the funds to customer past-due accounts within 60 days of receiving CWWAPP funds.

On November 08, 2021, the City calculated outstanding arrearages and applied for $609,115.62 in CWWAPP funding for eligible water related charges. The following table summarizes the current estimate of how the CWWAPP benefits would be applied:

Customer Type No. of Accounts Payment Amount Requested
Water Residential 565 $564,367.04
Water Commercial 16 27,007.35
Subtotal 581 591,374.62
Administrative Costs (3%) 17,741.23
Total of Payment Amount Requested $609,115.62
The City expects to receive the funding from the Water Board in January 2022 and to apply the credits to customer bills in February and March 2022. Utility customers do not need to apply individually to receive assistance under the CWWAPP program, and there is no income qualification for the program. If a customer account is determined to be eligible for assistance according to the requirements of the program, a credit will be applied directly to the customer’s water and/or wastewater service on the utility bills to the extent funding is available. The City will not issue checks or payments directly to utility customers. The eligible customers will be notified via a letter, there will be a line item on the utility bill, and more information will be available on the City’s website. 19 Item 4.

The assistance program is directed toward utility customers who are unable to pay their bills due to the impacts of COVID-19. Grant funds received will cover eligible past due amounts that remain unp aid on customer accounts at the time the City receives the CWWAPP funding. These grant funds can only be used to cover past due amounts that remain unpaid at the time a utility receives program funding , payments made by customers subsequent to the date of application will reduce the amount of assistance credit applied to those customer accounts. If the bill credit does not cover the customer's full arrears amount, they will be offered the opportunity to enroll in a payment plan for the balance.

If there is funding available after taking care of the statewide water utility arrearages, funding will be made available for wastewater customer past -due bills. As of December 2021, wastewater arrearages total $523,121 for 464 customers. The program does not apply to arrearages for other Escondido utility bill components such as trash services.

Along with this federal funding, there is additional bill assistance support for low -income customers.

Eligible customers may apply directly for other federal and state programs available for rental assistance and utility bills through the Low Income Household Water Arrearages Program and the Housing is Key program.

RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution No. 2022-09

20 Item 4.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA , AUTHORIZING

PARTICIPATION IN THE CALIFORNIA WATER AND

WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PAYMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020 Governor Newsom proclaimed a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, issued Executive Order N -33-20 to require individuals to stay at home except as needed to maintain continuity of critical operations, issued Executive Order N -42-20 prohibiting discontinuance of water service indefinitely, and issued Executive Order N-60-20 that created a risk-based approach to reopening the economy, among other executive actions; and WHEREAS, the stay at home order and risk -based reopening framework were rescinded on June 11, 2021 by Executive Order N-07-21 and many provisions of other Executive Orders were phased out by Executive Order N-08-21, including establishing an end date for the shutoff moratorium on September 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law SB 1 55 extending the prohibition on the disconnection of water service until December 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, there have been economic impacts as a result of the COVID -19 pandemic and associated public health measures, including leaving many Californians unable to pay their water and wastewater bills due to lack of reliable and consistent employment; and WHEREAS, in response to the economic conditions caused by the COVID -19 pandemic, Section

19.55 (17) of the State Budget Act of 2021, as established by Assembly Bill No. 128 (Chapter 21, Statues of 2021) and as amended by Senate Bill No. 129 (Chapter 69, Statues of 2021), provided nearly $1 billion to the State Water Resources Control Board (“Water Board”) to administer the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program (“CWWAPP”) to reduce delinquent water and wastewater 21 Item 4.
balances for customers experiencing financial hardships related to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, the State’s funding for CWWAPP is funded by the federal Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund of 2021; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 148 (Chapter 115, Statutes of 2021), formally established the CWWAPP within the Water Board, enumerating the program’s requirements for utility participation; and WHEREAS, eligible customers are all residential and commercial customers, “past due bills” mean any customer utility bills that are 60 days or more past due and includes both active and inactive accounts, as well as customer accounts that have payment plans or payment arrangements, and the “COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period” means the period starting March 4, 2020, and ends June 15, 2021; and WHEREAS, to receive CWWAPP funding on behalf of eligible customers, a utility applicant must complete an application including submitting all necessary data and information to support the utility applicant’s request for CWWAPP funding; and
WHEREAS, if there are insufficient funds, the Water Board must allocate funds on a proportional basis; and
WHEREAS, if there are sufficient funds to reimburse the total amount of reported arrearages and revenue shortfalls of community water systems, the state board shall establish a program for funding wastewater treatment provider arrearages and shortfalls in accordance with the remaining funds; and WHEREAS, the Water Board must disperse funds for water arrearages by January 31, 2022 and the wastewater program must start following substantial completion of the water program and in no instance later than February 1, 2022; and
22 Item 4.

WHEREAS, within 60 days of receiving CWWAPP funds, a utility applicant must allocate payments as bill credits to customers to help address past due bills incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period and notify customers of the amounts credited to their accounts; and WHEREAS, a community water system receiving assistance under CWWAPP may expend up to 3 percent, or up to one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever amount is less, of that assistance for costs incurred in applying for the assistance or complying with use and reporting conditions of the assistance; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 148 created customer protections that require a community water system to offer a payment plan to affected customers and refrain from discontinuing service until (1) December 31, 2021, or (2) for a customer that has been offered an opportunity to participate in a payment plan, the date the customer misses the enrollment deadline for, or defaults on, the payment plan, whichever is later; and
WHEREAS, the City of Escondido operates wat er and wastewater utility systems with eligible customers that have past due bills during the COVID -19 pandemic bill relief period, and is in the process of applying for CWWAPP funding.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido , California, as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true.

2. The City Council does hereby authorize the City of Escondido’s participation in the CWWAPP and receipt of a CWWAPP grant in the amount of $609,115, or such other amount of CWWAPP funding as may be awarded to the City of Escondido.
23 Item 4.

3. The Deputy City Manager / Director of Utilities, or his designee, is authorized to execute program participation agreements as may be required for the City of Escondido’s participation in the CWWAPP.
24 Item 4.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 1050-65

SUBJECT

AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ESCONDIDO CREEK TRAIL TRANSIT CENTER BIKE

PATH IMPROVEMENTS AT QUINCE AND TULIP STREETS

DEPARTMENT
Engineering Services

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -06 awarding the construction contract to PAL General Engineering Inc., determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $747,000 . Resolution 2022-06 authorizes the Mayor to execute a Public Improvement Agreement in the amount of $549,689.00 for the Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bike Path Improvements at Quince and Tulip Streets (“Project”).

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Engineering Services, Julie Procopio)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
A budget adjustment (Attachment 1) is recommended to accept Active Transportation Program grant funds awarded by the State of California after competitive selection, in the amount of $747,000 to fund the Project . The total project cost is estimated at $849,000, with $102,000 in matching funds from TransNet previously budgeted.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Council approved Resolution 2018-114 for the submittal of a grant application for the subject project to the California Transportation Commission on July 11, 2018.

BACKGROUND

The City was awarded funding for this project through the Caltrans Active Transportation Program. The purpose of the Project is to improve the Escondido Creek Trail Bike Path crossings at the Tulip Street and Quince Street trail crossings. Improvements include new pedestrian signals, crosswalks, ramps, striping, and signage to enhance the safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic at the crossings.

25 Item 5.

On December 23, 2021, three sealed bids were received in response to the advertised request for bids on this Project. The low bid was 6.2 -percent lower than the engineer’s cost estimate of $586,000. The bid results are listed below:

PAL General Engineering Inc. $549,689.00
Blue Pacific Engineering & Construction $558,355.00
LC Paving $722,001.78

RESOLUTIONS
a. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06
b. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06 Exhibit “A” Public Improvement Agreement

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Adjustment

26 Item 5.

FM\105 (Rev.11/06)

C I T Y O F E S C O N D I D O

BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
Date of Request: January 12, 2022 For Finance Use Only Log #
Fiscal Year
ear
Department: Engineering Services
Division: Traffic
Project/Budget Manager: Julie Procopio 4001
Name Extension
Council Date (if applicable): 01/12/2022
(attach copy of staff report)
_____ Budget Balances
_____ General Fund Accts
_____ Revenue
_____ Interfund Transfers
_____ Fund Balance
Project/Account Description Account Number Amount of Increase Amount of Decrease Quince/Tulip Pedestrian
Signals
206-699901 $747,000
Active Transportation Grant 4127-206-699901 $747,000
Explanation of Request:

Budget Adjustment to receive and spend Active Transportation Program Grant funds in the amount of $747,000 from Caltrans.

APPROVALS

Department Head Date City Manager Date

Finance Date City Clerk Date
Distribution (after approval): Original: Finance
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7FC0C26D-2BD7-4922-AC6D-5BA97C548C7F 1/6/2022
1/6/2022
ATTACHMENT 1
27 Item 5.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR,

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, TO EXECUTE A PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PAL GENERAL
ENGINEERING INC., FOR THE ESCONDIDO CREEK TRAIL

TRANSIT CENTER BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENTS AT

QUINCE AND TULIP STREETS

WHEREAS, Active Transportation Program (“ATP”) grant funding has been secured for the Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bike Path Improvements at Quince and Tulip Streets (“Project”); and WHEREAS, a notice inviting bids for construction of said improvements was duly published in the Escondido Times-Advocate on December 2, 2021 and December 9, 2021; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notice, 3 sealed bids for the Project were opened and evaluated on December 23, 2021; and
WHEREAS, PAL General Engineering, Inc. was determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires at this time and deems it to be in the best public interest to award this construction contract to PAL General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $549,689.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California:

1. That the above recitations are true.

2. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor to execute , on behalf of the City, a Public Improvement Agreement with PAL General Engineering, Inc. in a substantially similar form to that which is attached and incorporated to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”, and subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney.
28 Item 5.

3. That the City Council approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $747,000, accepting ATP grant funding to fund the Project.
29 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 1 - CAO: 8/26/2021

CITY OF ESCONDIDO

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
This Public Improvement Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this ____ day of _____________________, 2022 (“Effective Date”),

Between: CITY OF ESCONDIDO
a California municipal corporation
201 N. Broadway
Escondido, CA 92025
Attn: Craig Williams
760-839-4812
("CITY")

And: PAL General Engineering Inc.
a California corporation
2364 Paseo De Las Americas, Suite 104-1461
San Diego, CA 92154
Attn: Abd Jahshan
858-860-5300
("CONTRACTOR").
(The CITY and CONTRACTOR each may be referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”)
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the per formance of work relating to the Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bike Path Improvements at Quince and Tulip Streets (“Project”), occurring at the intersections of the Escondido Creek Trail ( “ETC”) at Tulip Street and Quince Street, as further described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in conside ration of the mutual covenants, promises, terms, and conditions set forth herein, and the mutual benefits derived therefrom, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Project Documents . The Notice Inviting Sealed Bids/Notice to Contractors, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Form, Designation of Subcontractors, Workers' Compensation Certificate, Change Orders, Shop Drawing Transmittals, Information Required of CONTRACTOR, Non -collusion Affidavit, Insurance Certificates, Guarantees, General Conditions, Supplementary General Conditions, Special Conditions, Plans, Drawings, Specifications, the Agreement , and all modifications, addenda, and amendments thereto (“Project Documents”) are incorporated herein 30 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 2 - CAO: 8/26/2021 by this reference as if fully set forth herein. The Project Documents are complementary, and what is called for by any one shall be as binding as if called for by all.

2. Description and Performance of Work . CONTRACTOR shall furnish all work described in the Project Documents (“Work”). All Work to be performed and materi als to be furnished shall be completed in a good workmanlike manner, free from defects, in strict accordance with the plans, drawings, specifications, and requirements set forth in the Project Documents and all provisions of this Agreement.

3. Compensation. In exchange for CONTRACTOR’s completion of the Work, the CITY sha ll pay, and CONTRACTOR shall accept in full, an amount not to exceed the sum of $549,689 (“Contract Price”). CONTRACTOR shall be compensated only for performance of the Work described in this Agreement. No compensation shall be provided for any other work or services without the CITY’s prior written consent.

4. Term and Time of Performance. CONTRACTOR shall commence work within one week from the CITY's notice to proceed. CONTRACTOR shall diligently perform and complete the Work with professional quality and technical accuracy within 40 working days of starting the Work (“Completion Date”). Extension of term or time shall be subject to the CITY’s sole discretion.

5. Time Is of the Essence. If the Work is not completed by the Completion Date, it is understood that the CITY will suffer damage. It being impractical and infeasible to determine the amount of actual damage, in accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, the Parties agree that CONTRACTOR shall pay to the CITY as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum of $500 per day for each calendar day of delay until the Work is completed and accepted (“Liquidated Damages Amount”) . Th e Liquidated Damages A mount shall b e deducted from any payments due to, or that become due to, CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR'S surety shall be liable for the Liquidated Damages Amount.

6. Insurance Requirements.

a. CONTRACTOR shall pro cure and maintain , at its own cost, during the en tire term of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work, and the results of such Work, by CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. Insurance coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

(1) Commercial General Liability . Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Form CG 0001 11188 covering Commercial General Liability on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury (including emotional distress), sickness, disease, or death of any person other than the CONTRACTOR's employees , and personal and advertising injury, and damages because of injury or destruction of tangible property, including loss of use resulting there from, with limits no less than $3,000,000 combined single limit coverage per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage; or, if a general aggregate limit is applicable, either: (i) the general aggr egate limit shall specifically apply to the project identified in the bid specifications or to the location of such project which is the subject of these bid specifications with coverage to be no less than $3,000,000, or (ii) the general aggregate shall be at least $3,000,000 combined single limit coverage per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

31 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 3 - CAO: 8/26/2021 (2) Automobile Liability . ISO Form CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if CONTRACTOR has no owned autos, hired (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9 ), including damages because of bodily injury, death of a person, or property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle, all mobile equipment, and vehicles moving under CONTRACTOR’s control and engaged in the Work, with limits no less than $3,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

(3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with lim its of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

(4) If CONTRACTOR maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums otherwise required by this Agreement, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by CONTRACTOR.

b. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement must be acceptable to the City Attorney and shall meet the following requirements:

(1) Compliance with General Condition Requirements . Insurance coverage sh all comply with and meet all requirements set forth in Article 5.2 of General Conditions

(2) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance coverage must be provided by an insurer authorized to conduct business in the state of California with a current A.M. Best’s ra ting of no less than A-:VII, or as approved by the CITY.

(3) Additional Insured Status . Both the Commercial General Liability and the Automobile Liability policies must name the CITY (including its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers) specifically as an additional insured under the policy on a separate endorsement page. The Commercial General Liability additional insured endorsement shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38, and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used. The Automobile Liability additional insured endorsement shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CA 20 01.

(4) Primary Coverage. CONTRACTOR’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 with respect to the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of CONTRACTOR’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

(5) Notice of Cancellation . Each insurance policy shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with prior written notice to the CITY.

(6) Subcontractors. If applicable, CONT RACTOR shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated within this Agreement, and CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the CITY (including its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers) is an add itional insured on any insurance required from a subcontractor.

32 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 4 - CAO: 8/26/2021 (7) Waiver of Subrogation. CONTRACTOR hereby grants to the CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any l oss under such insurance. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this subsection shall apply regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from t he insurer. Any Workers’ Compensation policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors.

(8) Self-Insurance. CONTRACTOR may, with the CITY’s prior written consent, fulfill some or all of the insurance requirements contained in this Agreement under a plan of self - insurance. CONTRACTOR shall only be permitted to utilize such self -insurance if, in the opinion o f the CITY, CONTRACTOR’s (i) net worth and (ii) reserves for payment of claims of liability against CONTRACTOR are sufficient to adequately compensate for the lack of other insurance coverage required by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR’s utilization of self -insurance shall not in any way limit the liabilities assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement.

(9) Self-Insured Retentions. Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.

c. Verification of Coverage . At the time CONTRACTOR exec utes this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall provide the CITY with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting the insurance coverage required by this Agreement), which s hall meet all requirements under this Agreement. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by this Agreement, at any time.

d. Special Risks or Circumstances. The CITY reserves the right, at any point during the term of this Agreement, to modify the insurance requirements in this Agreement, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

e. No Limitation of Obligations. The insurance requirements within this Agreement, including the types and limits of insurance coverage CONTRACTOR must maintain, and any approval of such insurance by the CITY, are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to any provisions within this Agreement concerning indemnification.

f. Compliance. Failure to comply with any of the insurance requirements in this Agreement , including but not limited to a lapse in any required insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement, shall be a material breach of this Agreement. Compliance by CONTRACTOR with the requirement to carry insurance a nd furnish certificates, policies, Additional Insured Endorsement and Declarations Page evidencing the same shall not relieve the CONTRACTOR from liability assumed under any provision of this Agreement , including, without limitation, the obligation to defe nd and indemnify the CTY and the City Engineer. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with any insurance requirement set forth in this Agreement, in addition to any other remedies the CITY may have, the CITY may, at its sole option, (i) immediately terminate this Agreement; or (ii) order CONTRACTOR to stop Work 33 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 5 - CAO: 8/26/2021 under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment that becomes due to CONTRACTOR until CONTRACTOR demonstrates compliance with the insurance requirements in this Agreement.

7. Indemnification, Duty to Defend, and Hold Harmless.

a. CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR’s agents, employees, and subcontractors, if any) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and a ll claims, demands, actions, causes of action, proceedings (including but not limited to legal and administrative proceedings of any kind), suits, fines, penalties, judgments, orders, levies, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, or injuries, in l aw or equity, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorney’s fees and other related litigation costs and expenses (collectively, “Claims”), of every nature caused by, arising out of, or in connection with CONTRACTOR’s (including CONTRACTOR’s agents, employees, and subcontractors, if any) Work pursuant to this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained herein, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the CITY.

b. CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR’s agents, employees, and subcontractors, if any) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all Claims caused by, arising under, or resulting from any violation, or claim of violation, of the San Diego Municipal Storm Water Permit (Order No.

R9-2013-0001, as amended) of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 9, San Diego, that the CITY might suf fer, incur, or become subject to by reason of, or occurring as a result of, or allegedly caused by, any Work performed pursuant to this Agreement.

c. All terms and provisions within this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8. Bonds.

a. CONTRACTOR shall furnish and deliver to the CITY, simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the following surety bonds:

(1) Faithful Performance Bond . CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the CITY a surety bond in an amount equal to the Contract Price as sec urity for faithful performance of this Agreement.

(2) Labor and Materials Bond. CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the CITY a surety bond in an amount equal to the Contract Price as security for payment to persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection with the Project.

b. All bonds furnished to the CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be in the form set forth herein and approved by the City Attorney.

c. All bonds shall be executed by sureties that are named in the current list of "Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies" as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Audit Staff, Bureau of Government Financial Operations, U.S. Treasury Department. All bonds signed by an agent must be accompanied by a certified copy of such agent's authority to act.

34 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 6 - CAO: 8/26/2021 d. If the surety on any bond furnished by the CONTRACTOR is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or its right to do business is terminated in any state where any part of the W ork is located, the CONTRACTOR shall, within seven days thereafter, substitute another bond and surety, which must be acceptable to the C ITY. No portion of the Work shall be performed without bonds, in a form and issued by a surety acceptable to the City. If one or more of such bonds shall, at any time, not be in full force and effect, CONTRACTOR shall immediately cease performance of the Work until CONTRACTOR is in full compliance with the bonding requirements of this Agreement and California law. All delays and costs incurred or resulting from such occurrence shall be to the exclusive account of CONTRACTOR. Failure of the CONTRACTOR to promptly cure any failure to have the necessary bonds in full force and effect shall be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement.

e. All bonds shall be obtained from surety companies that are duly licensed or authorized in the State of California. Such surety companies shall also meet any additional requirements and qualifications as may be provided in the Supplementary General Conditions.

9. Substitution of Securities . This Agreement is subject to California Public Contract Code section 22300, which permits the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the C ITY to ensure performance of this Agreement . At the request and expense of the CONTRACTOR, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the CITY, or with a state - or federally- chartered bank in this state as the escrow agent, who shall then pay those moneys to CONTRACTOR. Upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of the W ork, such securities shall be returned to the CONTRACTOR.

10. Contractor Default. In the event CONTRACTOR, for a period of 10 calendar days after receipt of written demand from the CITY to do so (“Cure Period”), fails to furnish tools, equipment, or labor in the necessary quantity or quality required by this Agreement, or fails to prosecute the Work and all parts thereof in a diligent and workmanlike manner, or after commencing to do so within the Cure Period, fa ils to continue to do so, then the CITY in its sole discretion may exclude the CONTRACTOR from the Property, or any portion thereof, and take exclusive possession of the Property or any portion thereof, together with all material and equipment thereon, and may complete the Work or any portion of the Work, either by (i) furnishing the necessary tools, equipment, labor , or material s; or (ii) letting the unfinished portion of the work, or any portion thereof, to another contractor ; or (iii) demanding the suret y hire another contractor ; or (iv) any combination of such methods. The CITY’s procuring of the completion of the Work, or the portion of the Work taken over by the CITY, shall be a charge against the CONTRACTOR and may be deducted from any money due or t o become due to CONTRACTOR from the CITY, or the CONTRACTOR shall pay the CITY the amount of s uch charge, or the portion thereof unsatisfied.

The sureties provided for under this Agreement shall become liable for payment if CONTRACTOR fails to pay in full any such cost incurred by the CITY. The permissible charges for any such procurement of the completion of the Work include actual costs and fees incurred to third party individuals and entities (including but not limited to consultants, attorneys, inspec tors, and designers) and actual costs incurred by the CITY for the increased dedication of time of the CITY’s employees to the Project.

11. Other Legal Requirements Incorporated. Each and every provision of law and clause required by law to be inserted in this Agreement or its attachments shall be deemed to be inserted herein, and this Agreement shall be read and enforced as though such law or clause were included herein, and if through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not current ly inserted, then upon application of either Party, the Agreement shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction, without further changes to the remainder of the Agreement. 35 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 7 - CAO: 8/26/2021

12. Merger Clause. This Agreement, together with its attac hments or other documents described or incorporated herein, if any, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning the subject of this Agreement and supersedes and replaces all prior negotiations, understandings, o r proposed agreements, written or oral, except as otherwise provided herein. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and any of its attachments or related documents, if any, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

13. Attorney’s Fees and Costs . In any action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

14. Independent Contractor . CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor, and no agency or employment relationship is created by the execution of this Agreement.

15. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended except in a writing signed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR, and pursuant to action of the Escondido City Council.

16. Anti-Waiver Clause . None o f the provisions of this Agreement shall be waived by the CITY because of previous failure to insist upon strict performance, nor shall any provision be waived because any other provision has been waived by the CITY, in whole or in part.

17. Severability. Thi s Agreement shall be performed and shall be enforceable to the full extent allowed by applicable law, and the illegality, invalidity, waiver, or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the legality, validity, applicability, or enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

18. Governing Law. This Agreement and all rights and obligations arising out of it shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action arising from this Agreement shall be conducted only in the state or federal courts of San Diego County, California.

19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed on separate counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute o ne and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by electronic means, including an attachment to an email, shall be effective as delivery of an executed original. The Agreement on file with the City is the copy of the Agreement that shall take precedence if any differences exist between or among copies or counterparts of the Agreement.

20. Provisions Cumulative . The foregoing provisions are cumulative to, in addition to, and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the CITY.

21. Business License . CONTRACTOR shall obtain a City of Escondido Business License prior to execution of this Agreement and shall maintain such Business License throughout the term of this Agreement.

22. Compliance with Laws, Permits, and Licenses. CONTRACTOR shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and other legal requirements in effect during the term of this Agreement. This shall include, but shall not be limited to, all California Labor Code laws regarding payment of prevailing wages and all OSHA regulations. CONTRACTOR shall obtain any and all permits, licenses, and other authorizations necessary to perform the work under this Agreem ent. Neither the CITY, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of the CITY, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of CONTRACTOR to comply with this section. 36 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 8 - CAO: 8/26/2021

23. Prevailing Wages and Department of Industrial Relations Compliance . Pursuant to California Labor Code section 1770 et seq., CONTRACTOR agrees that a prevailing rate and scale of wages, in accordance with applicable laws, shall be paid in performing this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and other legal requirements pertaining to the paymen t of prevailing wages, including but not limited to the keeping of cert ified payroll records, overtime pay, employment of apprentices, and workers' compensation coverage, as further set forth in the General Conditions . CONTRACTOR shall file the required workers' compensation certificate before commencing work under this Agre ement. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

CONTRACTOR shall post all job site notices required by regulation. CONTRACTOR, as well as any subcontractors, shall be registered pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal (subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code section 4104), or engage in the performance of any public works contract subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code. Neither the CITY, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of the CITY, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of CONTRACTOR to comply with this section.

24. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 . CONTRACTOR shall keep itself informed of and shall comply with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”). CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that all of its employees and the employees of any subcontractor retained by CONTRACTOR who perform any portion of the Work under this Agreement are and will be authorized to perform the Work in full compliance with the IRCA. CONTRACTOR affirms that as a licensed contractor and employer in the State of California, all new employees must produce proof of eligibility to work in the United States within the first three days of employment and that only employees legally eligible to work in the United States will perform the Work . CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with the IRCA before commencing any portion of the Work, and continuously throughout the performance of the Work and the term of this Agreement.

25. Effective Date. Unless a different date is provided in this Agreement, the effective date of thi s Agreement shall be the latest date of execution set forth by the names of the signatories below. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
37 Item 5.

Resolution 2022-06
Exhibit A

Public Improvement Agreement (Contractor) - 9 - CAO: 8/26/2021 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by the Parties or their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date:

CITY OF ESCONDIDO

Date: __________________ ___________________________________ Paul McNamara, Mayor

PAL General Engineering, Inc.

Date: __________________ ___________________________________ Signature

___________________________________
Name & Title (please print)

___________________________________
Contractor's License No.

___________________________________
Tax ID/Social Security No.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MICHAEL R. MCGUINNESS, City Attorney

BY: __________________________

THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST QUALIFIED PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.

38 Item 5.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0470-20

SUBJECT
PURCHASE TWENTY-FIVE (25) 2022 FORD HYBRID INTERCEPTOR UTILITY VEHICLES

DEPARTMENT
Public Works Department, Fleet Services Division

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council approve Resolution No. 2022-15 authorizing the Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department to purchase twenty -five (25) Ford Hybrid Police Interceptor Utility Vehicles from Downtown Ford Sales of Sacramento, California, in the amount of $1,107,211.13 by attaching to the City of Sacramento’s purchase contract No. B19153311005, and approving the disposal of the surplus vehicles via auction.

Staff Recommendation: Approve.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Sufficient funds were budgeted and are available in the Fleet Services Vehicle Replacement Fund, account no. 5208-653-715.

The potential revenue generated by the disposal of the surplus property is unknown until the results of the auction are returned to the City of Escondido ( “City”). The funds generated by the auction sale will be deposited into the Fleet Reserve Fund.

BACKGROUND
This purchase is necessary to replace twenty -five marked police patrol Ford interceptor vehicles. The existing patrol vehi cles have been in service between 7 and 8 years, and are being replaced due to exceeding their standard service life expectancy, excessive mileage, and overall condition. This purchase will replace non-hybrid interceptors with hybrid units which will help the City move towards CAP goals by reducing the amount of fuel consumed.

Upon approval from the City Council, twenty -five (25) Ford Hybrid Interceptor Utility vehicles will be purchased from Downtown Ford Sales of Sacramento, California utilizing a cooperative purchase contract with the City of Sacramento as allowed per Escondido Municipal Code, Chapter 10, Article 5, Section 10 - 91, authorizing the purchase of supplies and equipment utilizing cooperative purchase programs. The purchase quote from Downtown Ford Sales is provided as Attachment “1” to this Staff Report. 39 Item 6.

Pursuant to the Escondido Municipal Code, Chapter 10, Article 7, Section 10-147, City property that is no longer required for public use may be declared as surplus property. The City’s current practice of disposing surplus vehicles and equipment is through public auction. Staff recommends the disposal of the vehicles being replaced by this purchase via public auction with the City contracted auction company. The list of vehicles to be replaced and auctioned is attached as Exhibit “A” to Resolution No. 2022-15.

RESOLUTIONS

1. Resolution No. 2022-15

2. Resolution No. 2022-15 Exhibit “A” – List of Vehicles Scheduled to be Replaced

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment “1” Purchase Quote

40 Item 6.

Attachment "1"
41 Item 6.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-15

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FLEET
SERVICES DIVISION TO PURCHASE TWENTY-FIVE (25)
2022 FORD HYBRID INTERCEPTOR POLICE VEHICLES

FROM DOWNTOWN FORD SALES OF SACRAMENTO ,

APPROVING THE DISPOSAL OF THE SURPLUS VEHICLES

VIA AUCTION

WHEREAS, t he Fleet Services Division has identified twenty-five (25) existing Ford Interceptor patrol vehicles that need to be replaced due to excessive engine hours, increased downtime, costly repairs, and these vehicles have met or are exceeding the industry standard life expectancy of eight (8) years; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available in the Fleet Services vehicle replacement fund in account No. 5208-653-715 to purchase new vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sacramento conducted a competitive bid process for police patrol vehicles and Downtown Ford Sales was deemed to be the lowest most responsive bidder; and WHEREAS, the City is ut ilizing the cooperative purchasing option with the City of Sacramento, Contract No. B19153311005, as per Escondido Municipal Code Chapter 10, Article 5, Section 10-91, which has been conducted in a competitive manner by the State, County or any other Publ ic or Municipal Agency; and
WHEREAS, the police patrol vehicles being replaced by this purchase, as listed on Exhibit “A” , which is attached to this resolution and incorporated by this reference, are deemed surplus property and are no longer required for public use; and
42 Item 6.

WHEREAS, the City Council desires at this time and deems it to be in the best public interest to accept the recommendations of the Director of Finance and approve the disposal of surplus vehicles via auction.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California:

1. That the above recitations are true.

2. That the City Council is authorized to approve the Cooperative Purchase with the City of Sacramento Contract No. B19153311005 per Escondido Municipal Code Chapter 10, Article 5, Section 10 -

91. 3. That the City Council authorizes the Fleet Services Division to purchase twenty-five (25) Ford Hybrid Police Interceptor Patrol Vehicles from Downtown Ford Sales of Sacramento, California, utilizing a cooperative purchase contract with the City of Sacramento, Contract No. B19153311005, in the amount of $1,107211.13, which includes, delivery, all taxes, and related fees.

4. That the City Council authorizes the Director of Finance to dispose of surplus vehicles th at are being replaced by this purchase via auction with the City’s existing auction company. 43 Item 6.

Scheduled Vehicle Replacements - FY 22' Resolution No. 2021-15 Exhibit "A"

2 3726 2013 Patrol Interceptor Utility
3 3727 2013 Patrol Interceptor Utility
4 3728 2013 Patrol Interceptor Utility
5 3729 2013 K9 Interceptor Utility
6 3730 2013 K9 Interceptor Utility
7 3749 2014 Lieutenant Interceptor Utility
8 3750 2014 Lieutenant Interceptor Utility
9 3751 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
10 3752 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
11 3753 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
12 3754 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
13 3755 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
14 3756 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
15 3757 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
16 3758 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
17 3759 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
18 3760 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
19 3761 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
20 3762 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
21 3763 2014 Gang Patrol Interceptor Utility
22 3764 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
23 3765 2014 Patrol Interceptor Utility
24 3766 2014 K9 Interceptor Utility
25 3767 2014 K9 Interceptor Utility
44 Item 6.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0470-20

SUBJECT

AMBULANCE GURNEY PURCHASE

DEPARTMENT
Fire

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-16 taking the following actions:

1. Accept the lowest responsive bid from Ferno to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys.

2. Authorize the Fire Department to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys from Ferno in the amount of $229,447.12.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Fire: Rick Vogt)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
On September 29, 2021, City Council approved the use of $230,000 of the Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to replace the City of Escondido’s (“City”) current inventory of fifteen (15) gurneys.

PREVIOUS ACTION
None.

BACKGROUND
The current inventory of ambulance gurneys has reached the end of their useful life and the manufacturer will soon be discontinuing replacement parts for these models. Escondido Fire has five (5) front line ambulances along with four (4) reserve ambulances. In addition to the nine (9) gurneys needed for the ambulances, an additional five (5) gurneys are needed as reserve gurneys. One of the new gurneys will be a special bariatric gurney which will accommodate and transport patients up to 700 pounds by using a battery powered hydraulic lift sys tem. All of the ambulances will be outfitted with upgraded hardware mounted on the floor that receives and secures the gurney providing enhanced safety for the patient and EMT or Paramedic attendant.

Ambulance gurneys are essential for the care, comfort a nd transportation of patients, including those experiencing flu-like symptoms and COVID -19. Replacing the current inventory with new models will provide technological updates and safety features that will benefit patients and the ambulance crew. 45 Item 7.

A request for bids was duly published and provided to four prospective bidders on November 18, 2021.

Ferno was the only bidder that submitted a competitive bid. The unit price per ambulance offered by Ferno is a reasonable market price. Therefore, staff recommend s awarding the Contract to Ferno as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder that conformed to the City’s bid specifications and requirements.

RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution No. 2022-16

46 Item 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE

OF AMBULANCE GURNEYS FOR THE ESCONDIDO FIRE
DEPARTMENT FROM FERNO, INC.

WHEREAS, the City of Escondido (“City”) proposes to purchase fifteen (15) new ambulance gurneys; and
WHEREAS, American Rescue Plan Act funds have been approved and allocated to cover the cost of the new ambulance gurneys; and
WHEREAS, the City of Escondido duly published an invitation for unit price bids with detailed specifications for the purchase of ambulance gurneys; and WHEREAS, request for bids for ambulance gurneys were emailed to four vendors on November 18, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Ferno was the only responsive bidder that conformed to the City’s bid specifications and requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director recommends awarding a Purchasing Contract (“Contract”) to Ferno.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California:

1. That the above recitations are true.
47 Item 7.

2. That the City Council approves Resolution No. 2022-16 accepting the lowest responsive bid from Ferno to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys and authorizing the Fire Department to purchase fifteen (15) ambulance gurneys from Ferno in the amount of $229,447.12.

48 Item 7.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0135-10

SUBJECT

CITY OF ESCONDIDO LETTER OF SUPPORT TO CALTRANS FOR A SOUND ATTENUATING WALL BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND EL KU AVENUE

DEPARTMENT
City Manager’s Office

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council approve authorizing the Mayor to execute, on behalf of the City, a letter to the District 11 Office of the California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) supporting the design and construction of a sound attenuating wall between Interstate 15 and residences along El Ku Avenue in southern Escondido. The proposed letter is attached to this report (“Attachment 1”).

Staff Recommendation: Approval (City Manager’s Office: Christopher W. McKinney)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no anticipated cost to the City of Escondido for construction of the proposed sound attenuating wall. If a wall is ultimately constructed, the project will be funded and managed by Caltrans.

PREVIOUS ACTION
None.

BACKGROUND
The residential neighborhood along El Ku Avenue is adjacent to Interstate 15 and immediately east of the Centre City Parkway off-ramp in southern Escondido. Presently, no sound attenuating wall exists between the El Ku neighborhood and the freeway. Residents have reported excessive noise levels from the freeway on their properties and an acoustical impact assessment report was commissioned and prepared by Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc. A copy of the acoustical report is attached to this staff report for reference (“Attachment 2”).

The El Ku neighborhood is located in Escondido City Council District 4. Residents requested a letter of support from the City to Caltrans for design and construction of a sound attenuating wall. The requested wall would serve as a barrier to reduce noise from the freeway and the northbound off -ramp at Centre City Parkway. The span of the residences adjacent to the freeway and addressed by the acoustical impact assessment is 3137 El Ku Avenue to 3014 El Ku Avenue. Council Member Michael Morasco, who represents City Council District 4, requested this item to be placed on the City Council agenda to allow the City Council to consider the residents’ request for a support letter to Caltrans. 49 Item 8.

City staff have reviewed the acoustical impact assessment report and note that current noise levels are above those deemed acceptable for new construction as outlined in the City’s municipal code and general plan. Should traffic volumes increase on Interstate 15 in the coming decades, such a wall will be increasingly necessary.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment “1” - Proposed letter of support from to Caltrans for construction of a sound wall.

2. Attachment “2” – Acoustical Impact Assessment of the El Ku Residential Community. 50 Item 8.

Paul McNamara
Mayor
201 North Broadway, Escondido, CA 92025
Phone: 760-839-4638
[email protected]
DATE
California Department of Transportation, District 11
4050 Taylor Street
San Diego, CA 92110
SUBJECT: Letter of Support for Installation of a Sound Attenuating Wall between Interstate 15 and El Ku Avenue in the City of Escondido
To Whom It May Concern:

I write to you on behalf of the Escondido City Council in support of a request from residents along El Ku Avenue for construction of a sound attenuating wall between their neighborhood in southern Escondido and Interstate 15.

Presently, no sound attenuating wall exists between the El Ku neighborhood and the freeway.

Residents have reported unacceptable noise levels attributed to the freeway on their properties .

An acoustical impact assessment by Investigative S cience and Engineering, Inc was commissioned to study the issue . A copy of the acoustical report is attached to this letter for your reference.

The span of the residences adjacent to the freeway and within the acoustical impact assessment is 3137 El Ku Avenue to 3014 El Ku Avenue. Several homes in the neighborhood are already impacted by excessive noise levels from the freeway. This problem will only grow as traffic volumes grow in the coming decades.

We ask that Caltrans work to design and construct a sound attenuating wall as soon as i s practical to relieve noise impacts from Interstate 15 on the El Ku Avenue neighborhood.

Sincerely,
Paul McNamara, Mayor
51 Item 8.

ATTACHMENT 1
AEROSPACE • ACOUSTICS • VIBRATION • MATERIALS SCIENCE • GEOPHYSICS • HISTORIC PRESERVATION FORENSIC ENGINEERING • EXPERT WITNESS • AIR QUALITY • ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

SAN DIEGO CORPORATE OFFICE
P.O. Box 488, Ramona, CA 92065
Phone: 760-787-0016
www.ise.us
The Leader in Scientific Consulting and Research…
20 Oc
tober 2021
Mr. Douglas Shultz
3045 El Ku Avenue
Escondido, CA 92025
RE: ACOUSTICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
EL KU AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY – ESCONDIDO, CA
ISE PROJECT #21-002
Dear Doug:

At your request, Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc. (ISE) has been retained to perform an acoustical impact assessment o f future-predicted traffic noise levels within the El Ku residential neighborhood community located in Escondido, CA .

Our findings are presented in this summary letter report.

Problem Background
The
subject area consists of the El Ku residential community consisting of 36 parcels along the eastern frontage of Interstate 15 (I -15), as can be seen in Figure s 1 through 3) . T h i s d e v e l o p m e n t a r e a, formerly consisting of rural residential and agricultural uses, has been in its current street configuration since the late 1950’s, predating the newer I-15 corridor. Substantial development of the study area started in the early 1970’s and has progressed, on and off, to the current day. At this time, the neighborhood would be considered completely built out.

Past improvements made by Caltrans in the early 2000’s to update and realign the section of I -15 adjacent to the El Ku study area, have u n f o r t u n a t e l y r e s u l t e d i n increased noise impacts to the members of this community. A noise barrier scope study report (NBSSR) prepared by Caltrans in the same time period identified selected impacts to the community, but did not deem it necessary to construct onsite mitigation at the time of the aforementioned improvements.

It is ISE’s understanding that traffic noise from I -15 has continued to be an ongoing problem to the El Ku community for the past 20 years , w i t h r e s i d e n t s commenting that the traffic noise level has increased steadily over time. Thus, i t is the purpose of this report to analyze a future traffic noise condition for I -15, isolated from any other community sources , t o a s c e r t a i n t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f t h i s f r e e wa y s e g me n t t o t h e community noise level, and predict its level of impact using curre nt best available data.

ATTACHMENT 2
52 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

FIGURE 1: Subject Study Area Vicinity Map (ISE 10/21)
ATTACHMENT 2
53 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

FIGURE 2: Subject Study Area Parcel Location Map (ISE 10/21) ATTACHMENT 2
54 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

FIGURE 3: Aerial Isometric Image of Subject Study Area (ISE 10/21) ATTACHMENT 2
55 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

Definition of Terms

Sound waves are gene rally described as linearly compressive mechanical waves, which propagate in solids, liquids, and gases. The medium transmitting the wave oscillates in the direction of propagation. All sound waves originate from a vibrating surface, alternately compress ing, and then expanding , the transmitting medium.

The phenomenon known as ‘noise’ is defined as the superposition of multiple periodic sound waves each having a large number of frequency components. The principal response to environmental noise is annoyance. The degree of annoyance is influenced by the type of noise, its perceived importance, the time of day, and the sensitivity of the individual hearing the sound.

The human ear has a large
dynamic range where sound can be
detected. Because of this vast range,
any attempt to represent the acoustic
intensity of a particular sound on a linear
scale becomes unwieldy. As a result, a
logarithmic ratio, originally conceived for
radio work, known as the decibel (dB) , is
commonly employed.

As can be seen in Figure 4, a
sound level of zero “0” dB is scaled such
that it is defined as the threshold of
human hearing, and would be barely
audible to an ‘average’ person under
extremely quiet listening conditions.

Sound le vels above 120 dB correspond
roughly to the threshold of pain, while
the minimum change in sound level that
the human ear can detect is
approximately 3.0 dBA. A pressure
change of 10 dB is usually perceived by
the average person as a doubling (or
halving) of the sound’s loudness.

Most o f t h e s o u n d s w e h e a r i n
any environmental setting do not consist
of a single frequency, but rather are
comprised of a broad band of
frequencies differing in intensity. The intensities of each frequency add together to generate the sound we ultimately hear. The method used to quantify environmental

FIGURE 4: Typical Sound Levels (ISE 10/21)
ATTACHMENT 2
56 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

sounds o f t h i s t y p e , c o n s i s t s o f aggregating the frequency spectrum o f a s o u n d according to a weighting system that mimics t he nonl i near r esponse char act er i st i cs of the human ear. This is called "A" weighting, and the decibel level measured is called the A-weighted sound level (or dBA ).

Although the A -weighted s o u n d l e v e l m a y a d e q u a t e l y i n d i c a t e t h e l e v e l o f environmental noise at any instant in ti me, community noise levels vary continuously throughout the day. Most environmental noise includes a conglomeration of sounds from distant sources that create a relatively steady background noise in which no particular source is identifiable. For this type o f n o i s e , a s i n g l e d e s c r i p t o r c a l l e d t h e L eq ( o r
equivalent sound level) is used. Leq is the energy -mean A-weighted sound level during a measured time interval, and would be defined mathematically by the following continuous integral,

Leq = 10Log10
1 T SPL(t)2 dt
0 T
∫
⎡
⎣
⎢
⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥
⎥

Where the following variables are defined :

Leq = The energy equivalent sound level , ‘t ’ is the independent variable of time, T = The total time interval of the event, and,
SPL = The sound pressure level re. 20 µPa.

Thus, Leq is the ‘equivalent’ constant sound level that would have to be produced by a given source to equal the average of the fluctuating level measured. For most acoustical studies, the study interval is generally taken as one -hour, a n d t h e abbreviation used is Leq-h or L eq(h); however, other time intervals are utilized depending on the jurisdictional preference.

Finally, the aggregate of all community noise events are typically averaged into a single value known as the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). This descriptor is calculated by averaging all events over a specified time interval , and applying a 5 -dBA penalty to any sounds occurring between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p .m., a n d a 1 0-dBA penalty to sounds that occur during nighttime hours (i.e., 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). This penalty is applied to compensate for the increased sensitivity to noise during the quieter nighttime hours. Mathematically, CNEL c a n b e d e r i v e d b a s e d u p o n t h e h o u r l y Leq values, via the following expression:

CNEL = 10Log10
1 n 10
Leq(day)i
10 +10
Leq(evening+5)i
10 +10
Leq(night+10)i
10 ⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
i =1
n
∑

With the following variables :

Leq(x)i = The equivalent sound level during period ‘x’ at time interval ‘i’, and, n = The number of time intervals.

ATTACHMENT 2
57 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

Applicable Significance Thresholds

City of Escondido Noise Regulations

The City of Escondido, through its Noise Element of the General Plan and Community Protection Element, has established criteria for compatibility of noise f o r various land uses, as shown in Table 1 below. Sound levels up to 65 dBA CNEL are considered compatible with sensitive land uses. 1

TABLE 1: City of Escondido Land Use Compatibility Matrix

1 Under the Community Protection and Safety Noise Policy E1.2, a goal has been set to attempt to lower noise within outdoor residential areas to 60 dBA CNEL. It is noted that this is a design goal and not a Gene ral Plan Policy, and that mitigation to this level may not be feasible for every case. These standards are typically applied to areas within a proposed development that would be classified as “usable exterior space”, such as rear and some side yards.

ATTACHMENT 2
58 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

State of California CCR Title 24

The California Code of R egulations (CCR), State Building Code, Part 2, Title 24, Appendix Chapter 35 ; “Noise Insulation Standards for Multifamily Housing ” requires that multi-family dwellings, hotels, and motels located where the C N E L e x c e e d s 6 0 d B A require an acoustical analysis showing that the proposed design will limit interior noise to less than 45 dBA CNEL for all residential spaces .2,3 Title 24 noise regulations became effective in California in 1974.

Worst-case noise levels, either existing or future, must be used for the purposes of impact determination . The City of Escondido h a s a d o p t e d t h e C C R T i t l e 2 4 regulations for all types of residential dwellings .

Approach and Me thodology

In order to facilitate a full acoustical modeling of the subject study area, ISE created a three -dimensional model of the El Ku neighborhood using geographic information system (GIS) methods. This model was further enhanced to include additional p r o p e r t y a t t r i b u t e s u n i q u e t o e a c h r e s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t y i n c l u d i n g t h e c u r r e n t property owner, the assessors parcel number (APN), construction date, finished pad height, and the number of structural stories consistent with 2019 -2020 LIDAR measurements.

For the acoustical modeling component, the Traffic Noise Model version 2.5 (TNM 2.5) based on FHWA -PD-96-010 and FHWA/CA/TL -87/03 standards was used to calculate future onsite vehicular traffic noise levels. 4 Dominant input to the TNM acoustical model included the following:

! A three-dimensional GIS model of the El Ku neighborhood and as-built centerline of northbound and southbound Interstate 15 (I -15) travel lanes inclusive of any HOV lanes (Source: ISE, 10/21).
! Future County of San Diego / SANDAG Horizon Year 2030 Average Daily Trips for the aforementioned roadway segment(s).
! A traffic mix of 88.4% LDA/LDT, 6.4% MDT, 4.7% HDT, and 0.5% MCY in accordance with 2009 the Caltrans ITS T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o t o c o l s , a n d a p e a k h o u r traffic percentage of 10% of the ADT.
5 ! Rear yard and building façade t o p o g r a p h i c e l e v a t i o n s ( S o u r c e : U S G S DEM, Landsat/Copernicus LIDAR datasets , 10/21).

2 Noise insulation standards were officially ad opted by the California Commis sion of Housing and Community Development in 1974. In November 1988, the Building Standards Commission approved revisions to these standards (Title 24, Part 2, California Code of Regulations). The standards currently reside in Appendix Chapter 12 of the California Building Code and apply to all new construction in the State of California.
3 This standard is also codified in the 2013 version of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 1, Chapter 12 – Interior Environment, Section 1207 et. seq.
4 TNM 2.5 is the only noise-modeling program formally accepted for use within the State of California. 5 The Caltrans vehicle classifications are as follows: LDA = Light Duty Au tomobile, LDT = Light Duty Truck, MDT = Medium Duty Truck, HDT = Heavy Duty Truck, and MCY = Motorcycle. For values between approximately 8 and 12 percent, the energy -mean A -weighted sound level is equivalent to the CNEL.

ATTACHMENT 2
59 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

! Interstate 15 and Beethoven Drive existing slope e dges, and a s -built building envelopes within the El Ku neighborhood ( Source: ISE/Landsat, SANDAG 40 -foot topographic mapping, 10/21 ).
! A composite pavement type, consisting of an average of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Dense -Graded Asphaltic Concrete (DGAC) in accordance with TNM 2.5 test results (1998).

Modeled receptor areas consisting of existing o u t d o o r u s e a b l e s p a c e l o c a t i o n s within the residential footprint of each developed lot , as well as exterior building façade points, were sampled at various locations throughout the community to determine the variation of all acoustic sources affecting the project site. The complete model runs are provided as an attachment to this report.

Future Traffic Impact Findings

Direct Exterior Noise Impacts

Dominant future traffic n o i s e a f f e c t i n g t h e subject El Ku study area is predominately due to traffic activity along northbound and southbound Interstate 15 (I - 15) with lesser contributions from surface street traffic along Centre City Parkway to the west, and Beethoven Drive to the south. 6 Future SANDAG/Caltrans 2030 traffic predictions for the northbound I -15 corridor predict the following traffic volumes as shown in Table 2 below:

TABLE 2: I-15 2030 Traffic Predictions (per SANDAG/Caltrans )

Thus, future year 2030 worst -case average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along I-15 would be as high as 348,801 ADT.7 The posted travel speed within this freeway segment is 65 MPH. G i v e n this, t h e T N M p r e d i c t e d f u t u r e t r a f f i c n o i s e due to I -15 i s s h o w n i n Table 3, b e l o w, a l o n g w i t h t h e p r e d i c t e d p l a c e m e n t w i t h i n t h e C i t y ’ s l a n d u s e compatibility guidelines, and (where applicable) the as -built structures ’ p o t e n t i a l compliance with CCR Title 24. A d d i t i o n a l l y, the acoustical findings are provided graphically in Figure 4 on Page 12 of this report.

6 C e n t r e C i t y P a r k w a y i s e x p e c t e d to have future year 2030 traffic volumes as high as 20,014 ADT adjacent to the study area, while Beethoven Drive is expected to be 15,999 ADT.
7 This would equate to the following disaggregated future vehicle peak -hour volumes for northbound I-15: LDA/LDT = 15,160, MDT = 1,098, HDT = 806, MCY = 86. The commensurate level for southbound I -15 would be: LDA/LDT = 15,674, MDT = 1,135, HDT = 833, MCY = 89.

ATTACHMENT 2
60 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

TABLE 3: Predicted Future Potential Acoustical Impact Potential within Study Area

NOISE COMPATABILITY THRESHOLD CLASSIFICATION PER CITY/STATE

ADDRESS CONST
DATE STORIES Rear Yard
SPL (dBA)
Façade
SPL (dBA) Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unacceptable
Clearly
Unacceptable
Exceed CCR
Title 24?
121 Sierra St 1973 1 58.1 58.1 ⦿
123 Sierra St 1978 1 51.7 57.6 ⦿
125 Sierra St 1966 1 55.5 59.1 ⦿
129 Sierra St 1973 1 51.6 57.6 ⦿
130 Sierra St 1949 1 66.0 67.4 ⦿ Yes
133 Sierra St 1973 1 44.4 54.4 ⦿
136 Sierra St 2001 1 63.5 61.2 ⦿
140 Sierra St 1971 1 45.0 58.6 ⦿
150 Sierra St 1991 1 39.6 51.5 ⦿
154 Sierra St 1966 1 44.0 56.0 ⦿
3014 El Ku Ave 1965 1 65.8 71.9 ⦿ Yes
3018 El Ku Ave 1949 1 49.6 66.8 ⦿ Yes
3019 El Ku Ave 1955 1 71.2 74.6 ⦿ Yes
3022 El Ku Ave 1975 2 50.0 74.5 ⦿
3026 El Ku Ave 1974 1 60.8 74.6 ⦿ Yes
3030 El Ku Ave 1949 1 48.5 67.6 ⦿ Yes
3032 El Ku Ave 2001 2 47.0 74.7 ⦿
3034 El Ku Ave 1949 1 46.1 66.9 ⦿ Yes
3039 El Ku Ave 1977 1 74.4 75.7 ⦿
3042 El Ku Ave 2001 1 46.8 71.0 ⦿
3045 El Ku Ave 2020 1 76.0 75.8 ⦿
3046 El Ku Ave 1990 2 41.8 51.1 ⦿
ATTACHMENT 2
61 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

TABLE 3 (cont.): Predicted Future Potential Acoustical Impact Potential within Study Area

NOISE COMPATABILITY THRESHOL D CLASSIFICATION PER CITY/STATE

ADDRESS CONST
DATE STORIES Rear Yard
SPL (dBA)
Façade
SPL (dBA) Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unacceptable
Clearly
Unacceptable
Exceed CCR
Title 24?
3064 El Ku Ave 1949 1 64.6 71.0 ⦿ Yes
3105 El Ku Ave 1978 1 76.8 76.2 ⦿
3112 El Ku Ave 1949 1 51.6 69.4 ⦿ Yes
3115 El Ku Ave 1978 1 76.2 74.7 ⦿
3127 El Ku Ave 1990 1 78.7 77.8 ⦿
3133 El Ku Ave 1990 1 69.1 72.9 ⦿
3136 El Ku Ave 1949 1 65.3 68.6 ⦿ Yes
3137 El Ku Ave 1990 1 75.5 75.2 ⦿
3141 El Ku Ave 1990 1 67.2 69.0 ⦿
3145 El Ku Ave 1990 1 74.3 73.9 ⦿
3148 El Ku Ave 1949 1 63.2 67.4 ⦿ Yes
3154 El Ku Ave 2003 1 54.2 60.8 ⦿
3155 El Ku Ave 1990 1 69.8 68.7 ⦿
3164 El Ku Ave 2003 1 53.5 65.0 ⦿
Totals: 18 10 3 5 11
SPL values shown in dBA CNEL
ATTACHMENT 2
62 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

FIGURE 4: Expected Year 2030 Community Noise Levels Due to I -15 (ISE 10/21) ATTACHMENT 2
63 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

Based upon the findings, a total of 18 residential structures would remain within ‘normally acceptable’ levels as defined by the City under future year 2030 traffic conditions. Additionally, 10 residences would remain within the ‘conditionally acceptable’ levels of less than 65 dBA CNEL. From an exterior noise compliance standpoint under the City’s General Plan these exterior use areas would be deemed as non- impacted by future traffic noise.

In a similar fashion, a total of eight (8) structures would be potentially moderately- to severely -impacted under the future year 2030 traffic condition. Three (3) structures could potentially fall within the ‘normally unacceptable’ criteri a, and five (5) structures could potentially reside within the ‘clearly unacceptable’ criteria as defined under the City’s General Plan. These areas could be deemed as impacted by future traffic noise requiring some form of mitigation to reduce levels to a t, or below, the City’s ‘conditionally acceptable’ level than 65 dBA CNEL.

Direct Interior Noise Impacts

Additionally, Table 3 identifies a total of 11 residential structures, by virtue of their age, and anticipated future traffic noise exposure levels, which could have interior space in excess of the design limit of 45 dBA CNEL as prescribed by CCR Title 24. It is unknown at this time the extent of the individual impacts to each of the structures interior spaces, thus the list provided in Table 3 provid es a screening of future candidate sites for investigation.

Conclusions

Based upon the spatial and computational analysis of the El Ku study area , the following potential acoustical impact findings are indicated:

! Future year 2030 worst -case average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along I -15 would be as high as 348,801 ADT according to data from SANDAG and Caltrans. ! Future traffic activity along I -15 is expected to c r e a t e a c o m m u n i t y n o i s e c o n d i t i o n within the El Ku study area producing credible rear yard noise levels ranging from

39.6 to 78.7 dBA CNEL based on existing uses.
! Based on predictive worst-case modeling,
" A total of 28 residential uses were identified t o b e w i t h i n t h e C i t y ’ s ‘normally acceptable’ or ‘conditionally acceptable’ General Plan noise thresholds. T h e s e n o i s e l e v e l s c o u l d l i m i t f u t u r e o n s i t e c o n s t r u c t i o n without additional mitigation measures by the property owner. " A total of three (3) residential uses were identified to be within the City’s ‘normally unacceptable’ noise threshold . T h ese noise levels could limit future onsite construction and/or require additional mitigation measures by the property owner.
" A total of five (5) residential uses were identified to be within the City’s ‘clearly unacceptable’ threshold. These noise levels could restrict future onsite construction by the property owner.

ATTACHMENT 2
64 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

! A total of 11 residential uses were identified which could have interior space in excess of the design limit of 45 dBA CNEL as prescribed by CCR Title 24 . ! As a result of continued growth within this portion of San Diego County, it is expected that the aforementioned traffic noise condition will continue to increase .

Should you have an y questions regarding these findings, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Rick Tavares, Ph.D.

Director of Engineering
Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc.

Cc: Karen Tavares – ISE

Attachments: TNM 2.5 Model Input/Output Tables

ATTACHMENT 2
65 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

6308500 6309000 6309500 6310000 6310500 6311000 6311500 6312000 6312500 6313000 El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis
Plan View
Run name: EL KU
Scale: 500 feet
Sheet 1 of 1 19 Oct 2021
ISE
Project/Contract No. 21-002
TNM Version 2.5, Feb 2004
Analysis By: R. Tavares Ph.D.

Roadway:

Receiver:

Barrier:

Building Row:

Terrain Line:

Ground Zone: polygon
Tree Zone: dashed polygon
Contour Zone: polygon
Parallel Barrier:

Skew Section:

ATTACHMENT 2
66 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: ROADWAYS 21-002
ISE 19 October 2021
R. Tavares Ph.D. TNM 2.5
INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unless PROJECT/CONTRACT: 21-002 a State highway agency substantiates the use RUN: El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis of a different type with the approval of FHWA Roadway Points
Name Width Name No. Coordinates (pavement) Flow Control Segment X Y Z Control Speed Percent Pvmt On
Device Constraint Vehicles Type Struct?
Affected
ft ft ft ft mph %
NB I-15 100.0 NB I-15 3 82 6,309,615.0 1,974,488.0 581.80 Average NB I-15 4 83 6,309,784.0 1,974,145.0 541.70 Average
NB I-15 5 84 6,309,914.0 1,973,832.0 490.70 Average
NB I-15 6 85 6,310,030.0 1,973,543.0 471.60 Average
NB I-15 7 86 6,310,126.0 1,973,293.0 472.90 Average
NB I-15 8 87 6,310,212.0 1,973,048.0 467.80 Average
NB I-15 9 88 6,310,255.0 1,972,897.0 459.60 Average
NB I-15 10 89 6,310,293.0 1,972,716.0 456.60 Average
NB I-15 11 90 6,310,350.0 1,972,457.0 430.10 Average
NB I-15 12 91 6,310,387.0 1,972,252.0 429.70 Average
NB I-15 13 92 6,310,419.0 1,971,988.0 420.70 Average
NB I-15 14 93 6,310,452.0 1,971,763.0 414.10 Average
NB I-15 15 94 6,310,528.0 1,971,426.0 397.10
SB I-15 90.0 SB I-15 3 97 6,309,517.0 1,974,459.0 585.80 Average SB I-15 4 98 6,309,696.0 1,974,131.0 557.50 Average
SB I-15 5 99 6,309,821.0 1,973,823.0 501.30 Average
SB I-15 6 100 6,309,936.0 1,973,534.0 486.50 Average
SB I-15 7 101 6,310,032.0 1,973,279.0 490.80 Average
SB I-15 8 102 6,310,104.0 1,973,030.0 488.00 Average
SB I-15 9 103 6,310,142.0 1,972,883.0 486.80 Average
SB I-15 10 104 6,310,190.0 1,972,712.0 474.40 Average
SB I-15 11 105 6,310,242.0 1,972,453.0 440.70 Average
SB I-15 12 106 6,310,289.0 1,972,257.0 437.90 Average
SB I-15 13 107 6,310,341.0 1,971,989.0 428.20 Average
SB I-15 14 108 6,310,374.0 1,971,764.0 423.70 Average
C:\TNM25\EL KU 1 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
67 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: ROADWAYS 21-002
SB I-15 15 109 6,310,415.0 1,971,368.0 399.50
C:\TNM25\EL KU 2 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
68 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes 21-002
ISE 19 October 2021
R. Tavares Ph.D. TNM 2.5
INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes
PROJECT/CONTRACT: 21-002
RUN: El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis
Roadway Points
Name Name No. Segment
Autos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles

VS VS VS VS VS
veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph
NB I-15 NB I-15 3 82 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65 NB I-15 4 83 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 5 84 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 6 85 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 7 86 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 8 87 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 9 88 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 10 89 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 11 90 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 12 91 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 13 92 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 14 93 15160 65 1098 65 806 65 1 65 86 65
NB I-15 15 94
SB I-15 SB I-15 3 97 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65 SB I-15 4 98 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 5 99 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 6 100 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 7 101 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 8 102 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 9 103 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 10 104 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 11 105 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
C:\TNM25\EL KU 1 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
69 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes 21-002
SB I-15 12 106 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 13 107 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 14 108 15674 65 1135 65 833 65 1 65 89 65
SB I-15 15 109
C:\TNM25\EL KU 2 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
70 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: RECEIVERS 21-002
ISE 19 October 2021
R. Tavares Ph.D. TNM 2.5
INPUT: RECEIVERS
PROJECT/CONTRACT: 21-002
RUN: El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis
Receiver
Name No. #DUs Coordinates (ground) Height Input Sound Levels and Criteria Active X Y Z above Existing Impact Criteria NR in
Ground LAeq1h LAeq1h Sub'l Goal Calc.
ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB
121 F 189 1 6,310,969.0 1,972,590.0 431.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 121 R 191 1 6,311,047.0 1,972,573.0 431.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 123 F 192 1 6,311,173.0 1,972,497.0 410.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 123 R 193 1 6,311,222.0 1,972,546.0 410.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 125 F 194 1 6,311,091.0 1,972,655.0 422.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 125 R 195 1 6,311,164.0 1,972,626.0 422.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 129 F 196 1 6,311,214.0 1,972,740.0 416.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 129 R 197 1 6,311,295.0 1,972,715.0 416.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 130 F 198 1 6,310,957.0 1,972,859.0 454.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 130 R 199 1 6,310,964.0 1,972,902.0 454.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 133 F 200 1 6,311,285.0 1,972,842.0 415.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 133 R 201 1 6,311,339.0 1,972,810.0 415.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 136 F 202 1 6,311,046.0 1,972,856.0 438.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 136 R 203 1 6,311,040.0 1,972,798.0 438.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 140 F 204 1 6,311,059.0 1,973,085.0 434.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 140 R 205 1 6,311,151.0 1,973,128.0 434.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 150 F 206 1 6,311,366.0 1,973,024.0 410.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 150 R 207 1 6,311,419.0 1,973,029.0 410.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 154 F 208 1 6,311,175.0 1,972,946.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 154 R 209 1 6,311,229.0 1,972,962.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3014 F 210 1 6,310,415.0 1,973,516.0 448.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3014 R 211 1 6,310,521.0 1,973,553.0 448.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y C:\TNM25\EL KU 1 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
71 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: RECEIVERS 21-002
3018 F 212 1 6,310,676.0 1,973,531.0 453.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3018 R 213 1 6,310,720.0 1,973,545.0 453.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3019 F 214 1 6,310,424.0 1,973,109.0 446.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3019 R 215 1 6,310,475.0 1,973,153.0 446.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3022 F 216 1 6,310,603.0 1,973,404.0 475.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3022 R 217 1 6,310,626.0 1,973,433.0 475.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3026 F 218 1 6,310,597.0 1,973,291.0 469.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3026 R 219 1 6,310,665.0 1,973,325.0 469.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3030 F 220 1 6,310,768.0 1,973,416.0 465.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3030 R 221 1 6,310,809.0 1,973,442.0 465.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3032 F 222 1 6,310,717.0 1,973,217.0 486.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3032 R 223 1 6,310,777.0 1,973,211.0 486.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3034 F 224 1 6,310,821.0 1,973,285.0 472.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3034 R 225 1 6,310,860.0 1,973,303.0 472.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3039 F 226 1 6,310,567.0 1,973,017.0 455.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3039 R 227 1 6,310,636.0 1,972,983.0 455.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3042 F 228 1 6,310,811.0 1,973,122.0 473.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3042 R 229 1 6,310,918.0 1,973,144.0 473.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3045 F 230 1 6,310,595.0 1,972,815.0 444.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3045 R 231 1 6,310,610.0 1,972,777.0 444.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3046 F 232 1 6,311,004.0 1,973,224.0 450.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3046 R 233 1 6,311,071.0 1,973,242.0 450.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3064 F 234 1 6,310,841.0 1,972,913.0 465.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3064 R 235 1 6,310,888.0 1,972,928.0 465.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3105 F 236 1 6,310,617.0 1,972,659.0 435.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3105 R 237 1 6,310,592.0 1,972,643.0 435.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3112 F 238 1 6,310,833.0 1,972,603.0 441.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3112 R 239 1 6,310,901.0 1,972,586.0 441.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3115 F 240 1 6,310,675.0 1,972,537.0 428.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3115 R 241 1 6,310,640.0 1,972,493.0 428.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3127 F 242 1 6,310,601.0 1,972,388.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3127 R 243 1 6,310,598.0 1,972,320.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3133 F 244 1 6,310,713.0 1,972,369.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3133 R 245 1 6,310,776.0 1,972,330.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3136 F 246 1 6,310,916.0 1,972,445.0 437.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y C:\TNM25\EL KU 2 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
72 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: RECEIVERS 21-002
3136 R 247 1 6,311,046.0 1,972,441.0 437.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3137 F 248 1 6,310,643.0 1,972,203.0 415.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3137 R 249 1 6,310,611.0 1,972,260.0 415.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3141 F 250 1 6,310,779.0 1,972,225.0 418.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3141 R 251 1 6,310,754.0 1,972,272.0 418.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3145 F 252 1 6,310,658.0 1,972,078.0 406.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3145 R 253 1 6,310,629.0 1,972,112.0 406.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3148 F 254 1 6,310,974.0 1,972,269.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3148 R 255 1 6,311,063.0 1,972,314.0 425.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3154 F 256 1 6,311,117.0 1,972,276.0 414.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3154 R 257 1 6,311,185.0 1,972,267.0 414.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3155 F 258 1 6,310,803.0 1,972,108.0 402.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3155 R 259 1 6,310,785.0 1,972,060.0 402.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3164 F 260 1 6,310,986.0 1,972,159.0 412.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y 3164 R 261 1 6,311,106.0 1,972,194.0 412.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y CUL-DE-SAC (TEST PT) 262 1 6,310,953.5 1,972,066.9 403.00 5.00 0.00 65 10.0 8.0 Y C:\TNM25\EL KU 3 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
73 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
ISE 19 October 2021
R. Tavares Ph.D. TNM 2.5
INPUT: BARRIERS
PROJECT/CONTRACT: 21-002
RUN: El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis
Barrier Points
Name Type Height If Wall If Berm Add'tnl Name No. Coordinates (bottom) Height Segment Min Max $ per $ per Top Run:Rise $ per X Y Z at Seg Ht Perturbs On Important Unit Unit Width Unit Point Incre- #Up #Dn Struct? Reflec- Area Vol. Length ment tions?
ft ft $/sq ft $/cu yd ft ft:ft $/ft ft ft ft ft ft
3014 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3014-1 138 6,310,414.0 1,973,555.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-2 139 6,310,434.0 1,973, 577.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-3 140 6,310,450.0 1,973, 564.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-4 141 6,310,470.0 1,973, 585.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-5 142 6,310,505.0 1,973, 554.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-6 143 6,310,487.0 1,973, 534.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-7 144 6,310,493.0 1,973, 527.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-8 145 6,310,453.0 1,973, 485.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-9 146 6,310,414.0 1,973, 521.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-10 148 6,310,432.0 1,973, 540.0 448.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3014-11 147 6,310,414.0 1,973,555.0 448.00 25.00
3018 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3018-1 149 6,310,711.0 1,973,582.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-2 150 6,310,723.0 1,973, 572.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-3 151 6,310,701.0 1,973, 543.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-4 152 6,310,701.0 1,973, 530.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-5 153 6,310,727.0 1,973, 530.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-6 154 6,310,727.0 1,973, 517.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-7 155 6,310,718.0 1,973, 502.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-8 156 6,310,687.0 1,973, 503.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-9 157 6,310,686.0 1,973, 513.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-10 158 6,310,679.0 1,973, 513.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-11 159 6,310,679.0 1,973, 523.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-12 160 6,310,681.0 1,973, 523.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-13 161 6,310,682.0 1,973, 549.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-14 162 6,310,689.0 1,973, 561.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-15 163 6,310,693.0 1,973, 558.0 453.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3018-16 164 6,310,711.0 1,973,582.0 453.00 25.00
3022 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3022-1 165 6,310,583.0 1,973,427.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-2 166 6,310,607.0 1,973, 456.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-3 167 6,310,617.0 1,973, 448.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-4 168 6,310,608.0 1,973, 435.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-5 169 6,310,633.0 1,973, 415.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-6 170 6,310,644.0 1,973, 428.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-7 171 6,310,661.0 1,973, 414.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-8 172 6,310,629.0 1,973, 378.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 1 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
74 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3022-9 173 6,310,613.0 1,973, 390.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-10 174 6,310,619.0 1,973, 398.0 465.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3022-11 175 6,310,583.0 1,973,427.0 465.00 35.00
3030 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3030-1 176 6,310,759.0 1,973,447.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-2 177 6,310,793.0 1,973, 453.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-3 178 6,310,794.0 1,973, 446.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-4 179 6,310,803.0 1,973, 447.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-5 180 6,310,810.0 1,973, 413.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-6 181 6,310,821.0 1,973, 405.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-7 182 6,310,789.0 1,973, 366.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-8 183 6,310,766.0 1,973, 385.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-9 184 6,310,777.0 1,973, 399.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-10 185 6,310,769.0 1,973, 440.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-11 186 6,310,761.0 1,973, 439.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3030-12 187 6,310,759.0 1,973,447.0 465.00 25.00
3034 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3034-1 188 6,310,809.0 1,973,327.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-2 189 6,310,829.0 1,973, 340.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-3 190 6,310,869.0 1,973, 279.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-4 191 6,310,894.0 1,973, 275.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-5 192 6,310,892.0 1,973, 260.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-6 193 6,310,861.0 1,973, 263.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-7 194 6,310,847.0 1,973, 255.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-8 195 6,310,822.0 1,973, 293.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-9 196 6,310,828.0 1,973, 297.0 472.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3034-10 197 6,310,809.0 1,973,327.0 472.00 25.00
3026 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3026-1 198 6,310,597.0 1,973,297.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-2 199 6,310,640.0 1,973, 341.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-3 200 6,310,691.0 1,973, 296.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-4 201 6,310,670.0 1,973, 274.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-5 202 6,310,636.0 1,973, 303.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-6 203 6,310,614.0 1,973, 282.0 469.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3026-7 204 6,310,597.0 1,973,297.0 469.00 25.00
3032 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3032-1 205 6,310,745.0 1,973,251.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-2 206 6,310,757.0 1,973, 259.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-3 207 6,310,764.0 1,973, 249.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-4 208 6,310,775.0 1,973, 254.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-5 209 6,310,788.0 1,973, 233.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-6 210 6,310,775.0 1,973, 220.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-7 211 6,310,770.0 1,973, 199.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-8 212 6,310,766.0 1,973, 199.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-9 213 6,310,777.0 1,973, 182.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-10 214 6,310,753.0 1,973, 167.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-11 215 6,310,747.0 1,973, 178.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-12 216 6,310,736.0 1,973, 172.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-13 217 6,310,729.0 1,973, 183.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-14 218 6,310,734.0 1,973, 186.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-15 219 6,310,721.0 1,973, 207.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-16 220 6,310,726.0 1,973, 233.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 2 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
75 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3032-17 221 6,310,748.0 1,973, 247.0 476.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3032-18 222 6,310,745.0 1,973,251.0 476.00 35.00
3042 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3042-1 223 6,310,817.0 1,973,130.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-2 224 6,310,858.0 1,973, 144.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-3 225 6,310,881.0 1,973, 189.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-4 226 6,310,891.0 1,973, 192.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-5 227 6,310,896.0 1,973, 189.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-6 228 6,310,906.0 1,973, 210.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-7 229 6,310,928.0 1,973, 201.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-8 230 6,310,929.0 1,973, 195.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-9 231 6,310,912.0 1,973, 158.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-10 232 6,310,902.0 1,973, 162.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-11 233 6,310,898.0 1,973, 155.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-12 234 6,310,909.0 1,973, 126.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-13 235 6,310,908.0 1,973, 123.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-14 236 6,310,919.0 1,973, 092.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-15 237 6,310,883.0 1,973, 078.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-16 238 6,310,867.0 1,973, 122.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-17 239 6,310,846.0 1,973, 113.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-18 240 6,310,849.0 1,973, 105.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-19 241 6,310,829.0 1,973, 098.0 473.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3042-20 242 6,310,817.0 1,973,130.0 473.00 25.00
3046 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3046-1 243 6,311,009.0 1,973,263.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-2 244 6,311,047.0 1,973, 271.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-3 245 6,311,048.0 1,973, 267.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-4 246 6,311,059.0 1,973, 269.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-5 247 6,311,070.0 1,973, 200.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-6 248 6,311,056.0 1,973, 198.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-7 249 6,311,058.0 1,973, 189.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-8 250 6,311,032.0 1,973, 184.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-9 251 6,311,029.0 1,973, 192.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-10 252 6,311,021.0 1,973, 191.0 440.00 35.00 0.00 0 0 3046-11 253 6,311,009.0 1,973,263.0 440.00 35.00
140 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 140-1 254 6,311, 113.0 1,973,166.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-2 255 6,311,128.0 1,973, 159.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-3 256 6,311,124.0 1,973, 149.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-4 257 6,311,145.0 1,973, 140.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-5 258 6,311,131.0 1,973, 106.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-6 259 6,311,123.0 1,973, 110.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-7 260 6,311,105.0 1,973, 068.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-8 261 6,311,101.0 1,973, 070.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-9 262 6,311,098.0 1,973, 063.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-10 263 6,311,068.0 1,973, 078.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-11 264 6,311,104.0 1,973, 157.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-12 265 6,311,109.0 1,973, 156.0 434.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 140-13 266 6,311,113.0 1,973,166.0 434.00 25.00
150 SIERRA W 25.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 150-1 267 6,311,381.0 1,973,107.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-2 268 6,311,409.0 1,973, 097.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 3 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
76 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
150-3 269 6,311,406.0 1,973, 086.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-4 270 6,311,448.0 1,973, 070.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-5 271 6,311,439.0 1,973, 048.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-6 272 6,311,418.0 1,973, 055.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-7 273 6,311,409.0 1,973, 031.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-8 274 6,311,411.0 1,973, 016.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-9 275 6,311,376.0 1,973, 009.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-10 276 6,311,372.0 1,973, 036.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-11 277 6,311,380.0 1,973, 062.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-12 278 6,311,366.0 1,973, 068.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 150-13 279 6,311,381.0 1,973,107.0 410.00 25.00
154 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 154-1 280 6,311, 200.0 1,973,028.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-2 281 6,311,239.0 1,973, 018.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-3 282 6,311,231.0 1,972, 983.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-4 283 6,311,222.0 1,972, 985.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-5 284 6,311,208.0 1,972, 928.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-6 285 6,311,177.0 1,972, 937.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 154-7 286 6,311,200.0 1,973,028.0 425.00 25.00
133 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 133-1 287 6,311, 344.0 1,972,924.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-2 288 6,311,355.0 1,972, 912.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-3 289 6,311,362.0 1,972, 915.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-4 290 6,311,382.0 1,972, 889.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-5 291 6,311,375.0 1,972, 883.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-6 292 6,311,380.0 1,972, 875.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-7 293 6,311,364.0 1,972, 862.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-8 294 6,311,352.0 1,972, 828.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-9 295 6,311,330.0 1,972, 835.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-10 296 6,311,316.0 1,972, 797.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-11 297 6,311,306.0 1,972, 801.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-12 298 6,311,305.0 1,972, 796.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-13 299 6,311,297.0 1,972, 800.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-14 300 6,311,298.0 1,972, 806.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-15 301 6,311,290.0 1,972, 809.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-16 302 6,311,297.0 1,972, 829.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-17 303 6,311,287.0 1,972, 833.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-18 304 6,311,313.0 1,972, 903.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 133-19 305 6,311,344.0 1,972,924.0 415.00 25.00
129 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 129-1 306 6,311, 280.0 1,972,783.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-2 307 6,311,309.0 1,972, 759.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-3 308 6,311,259.0 1,972, 701.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-4 309 6,311,247.0 1,972, 710.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-5 310 6,311,234.0 1,972, 695.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-6 311 6,311,208.0 1,972, 718.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-7 312 6,311,220.0 1,972, 730.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-8 313 6,311,214.0 1,972, 735.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-9 314 6,311,232.0 1,972, 756.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-10 315 6,311,237.0 1,972, 752.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-11 316 6,311,257.0 1,972, 774.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 4 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
77 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
129-12 317 6,311,266.0 1,972, 768.0 416.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 129-13 318 6,311,280.0 1,972,783.0 416.00 25.00
125 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 125-1 319 6,311, 156.0 1,972,701.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-2 320 6,311,186.0 1,972, 672.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-3 321 6,311,169.0 1,972, 657.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-4 322 6,311,162.0 1,972, 643.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-5 323 6,311,151.0 1,972, 642.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-6 324 6,311,131.0 1,972, 628.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-7 325 6,311,105.0 1,972, 621.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-8 326 6,311,102.0 1,972, 626.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-9 327 6,311,094.0 1,972, 624.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-10 328 6,311,087.0 1,972, 645.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-11 329 6,311,096.0 1,972, 648.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-12 330 6,311,096.0 1,972, 662.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-13 331 6,311,119.0 1,972, 668.0 422.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 125-14 332 6,311,156.0 1,972,701.0 422.00 25.00
121 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 121-1 333 6,311, 004.0 1,972,653.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-2 334 6,311,044.0 1,972, 605.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-3 335 6,310,992.0 1,972, 559.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-4 336 6,310,971.0 1,972, 585.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-5 337 6,310,999.0 1,972, 610.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-6 338 6,310,981.0 1,972, 633.0 431.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 121-7 339 6,311,004.0 1,972,653.0 431.00 25.00
3112 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3112-1 340 6,310,833.0 1,972,633.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-2 341 6,310,870.0 1,972, 639.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-3 342 6,310,878.0 1,972, 599.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-4 343 6,310,874.0 1,972, 598.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-5 344 6,310,881.0 1,972, 565.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-6 345 6,310,879.0 1,972, 561.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-7 346 6,310,906.0 1,972, 543.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-8 347 6,310,894.0 1,972, 524.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-9 348 6,310,872.0 1,972, 538.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-10 349 6,310,874.0 1,972, 543.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-11 350 6,310,861.0 1,972, 552.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-12 351 6,310,846.0 1,972, 551.0 441.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3112-13 352 6,310,833.0 1,972,633.0 441.00 25.00
3115 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3115-1 353 6,310,712.0 1,972,576.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-2 354 6,310,719.0 1,972, 552.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-3 355 6,310,714.0 1,972, 551.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-4 356 6,310,720.0 1,972, 529.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-5 357 6,310,727.0 1,972, 530.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-6 358 6,310,733.0 1,972, 508.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-7 361 6,310,694.0 1,972, 496.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-8 360 6,310,675.0 1,972, 567.0 428.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3115-9 359 6,310,712.0 1,972,576.0 428.00 25.00
3136 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3136-1 362 6,310,945.0 1,972,471.0 437.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3136-2 363 6,310,992.0 1,972, 422.0 437.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3136-3 364 6,310,966.0 1,972, 398.0 437.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 5 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
78 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3136-4 365 6,310,919.0 1,972, 447.0 437.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3136-5 366 6,310,945.0 1,972,471.0 437.00 25.00
123 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 123-1 367 6,311, 172.0 1,972,534.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-2 368 6,311,183.0 1,972, 537.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-3 369 6,311,183.0 1,972, 541.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-4 370 6,311,206.0 1,972, 544.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-5 371 6,311,207.0 1,972, 540.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-6 372 6,311,215.0 1,972, 540.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-7 373 6,311,224.0 1,972, 495.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-8 374 6,311,229.0 1,972, 495.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-9 375 6,311,231.0 1,972, 485.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-10 376 6,311,228.0 1,972, 476.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-11 377 6,311,224.0 1,972, 475.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-12 378 6,311,227.0 1,972, 461.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-13 379 6,311,208.0 1,972, 458.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-14 380 6,311,204.0 1,972, 475.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-15 381 6,311,185.0 1,972, 472.0 410.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 123-16 382 6,311,172.0 1,972,534.0 410.00 25.00
3154 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3154-1 383 6,311,167.0 1,972,342.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-2 384 6,311,176.0 1,972, 337.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-3 385 6,311,172.0 1,972, 332.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-4 386 6,311,207.0 1,972, 309.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-5 387 6,311,191.0 1,972, 282.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-6 388 6,311,180.0 1,972, 287.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-7 389 6,311,176.0 1,972, 281.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-8 390 6,311,170.0 1,972, 284.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-9 391 6,311,151.0 1,972, 254.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-10 392 6,311,122.0 1,972, 273.0 414.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3154-11 393 6,311,167.0 1,972,342.0 414.00 25.00
3148 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3148-1 395 6,310,985.0 1,972,300.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-2 396 6,311,050.0 1,972, 292.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-3 397 6,311,049.0 1,972, 283.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-4 398 6,311,052.0 1,972, 281.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-5 399 6,311,051.0 1,972, 269.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-6 400 6,311,044.0 1,972, 269.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-7 401 6,311,042.0 1,972, 263.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-8 402 6,311,029.0 1,972, 265.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-9 403 6,311,028.0 1,972, 261.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-10 404 6,310,998.0 1,972, 265.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-11 405 6,310,996.0 1,972, 258.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-12 406 6,310,979.0 1,972, 261.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3148-13 407 6,310,985.0 1,972,300.0 425.00 25.00
3164 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3164-1 408 6,311,064.0 1,972,201.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-2 409 6,311,090.0 1,972, 157.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-3 410 6,311,054.0 1,972, 136.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-4 411 6,311,049.0 1,972, 145.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-5 412 6,311,043.0 1,972, 142.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-6 413 6,311,038.0 1,972, 150.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 6 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
79 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3164-7 414 6,311,007.0 1,972, 133.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-8 415 6,310,990.0 1,972, 161.0 412.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3164-9 416 6,311,064.0 1,972,201.0 412.00 25.00
3155 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3155-1 417 6,310,838.0 1,972,120.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-2 418 6,310,841.0 1,972, 099.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-3 419 6,310,871.0 1,972, 103.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-4 420 6,310,876.0 1,972, 061.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-5 421 6,310,829.0 1,972, 054.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-6 422 6,310,823.0 1,972, 091.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-7 423 6,310,811.0 1,972, 090.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-8 424 6,310,806.0 1,972, 115.0 402.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3155-9 425 6,310,838.0 1,972,120.0 402.00 25.00
3145 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3145-1 426 6,310,707.0 1,972,123.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-2 427 6,310,723.0 1,972, 092.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-3 428 6,310,712.0 1,972, 086.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-4 429 6,310,716.0 1,972, 078.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-5 430 6,310,710.0 1,972, 075.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-6 431 6,310,717.0 1,972, 062.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-7 432 6,310,683.0 1,972, 045.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-8 433 6,310,659.0 1,972, 088.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-9 434 6,310,693.0 1,972, 105.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-10 435 6,310,689.0 1,972, 113.0 406.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3145-11 436 6,310,707.0 1,972,123.0 406.00 25.00
3137 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3137-1 437 6,310,669.0 1,972,247.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-2 438 6,310,707.0 1,972, 230.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-3 439 6,310,696.0 1,972, 205.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-4 440 6,310,706.0 1,972, 199.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-5 441 6,310,710.0 1,972, 206.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-6 442 6,310,717.0 1,972, 202.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-7 443 6,310,700.0 1,972, 165.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-8 444 6,310,679.0 1,972, 176.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-9 445 6,310,683.0 1,972, 184.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-10 446 6,310,647.0 1,972, 200.0 415.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3137-11 447 6,310,669.0 1,972,247.0 415.00 25.00
3141 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3141-1 448 6,310,822.0 1,972,263.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-2 449 6,310,841.0 1,972, 230.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-3 450 6,310,828.0 1,972, 223.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-4 451 6,310,831.0 1,972, 216.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-5 452 6,310,823.0 1,972, 212.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-6 453 6,310,830.0 1,972, 199.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-7 454 6,310,800.0 1,972, 183.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-8 455 6,310,790.0 1,972, 201.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-9 456 6,310,797.0 1,972, 206.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-10 457 6,310,779.0 1,972, 238.0 418.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3141-11 458 6,310,822.0 1,972,263.0 418.00 25.00
3127 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3127-1 459 6,310,619.0 1,972,403.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-2 460 6,310,645.0 1,972, 385.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-3 461 6,310,638.0 1,972, 372.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 7 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
80 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3127-4 462 6,310,657.0 1,972, 357.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-5 463 6,310,634.0 1,972, 322.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-6 464 6,310,594.0 1,972, 350.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-7 465 6,310,613.0 1,972, 380.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-8 466 6,310,608.0 1,972, 385.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3127-9 467 6,310,619.0 1,972,403.0 425.00 25.00
3133 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3133-1 468 6,310,750.0 1,972,394.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-2 469 6,310,756.0 1,972, 385.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-3 470 6,310,749.0 1,972, 381.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-4 471 6,310,752.0 1,972, 373.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-5 472 6,310,777.0 1,972, 385.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-6 473 6,310,798.0 1,972, 351.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-7 474 6,310,746.0 1,972, 323.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-8 475 6,310,718.0 1,972, 376.0 425.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3133-9 476 6,310,750.0 1,972,394.0 425.00 25.00
3105 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3105-1 482 6,310,680.0 1,972,702.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-2 483 6,310,682.0 1,972, 682.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-3 484 6,310,701.0 1,972, 684.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-4 485 6,310,707.0 1,972, 648.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-5 486 6,310,678.0 1,972, 643.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-6 487 6,310,680.0 1,972, 637.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-7 488 6,310,654.0 1,972, 633.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-8 489 6,310,652.0 1,972, 645.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-9 490 6,310,623.0 1,972, 641.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-10 491 6,310,620.0 1,972, 668.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-11 492 6,310,649.0 1,972, 672.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-12 493 6,310,648.0 1,972, 679.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-13 494 6,310,664.0 1,972, 682.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-14 495 6,310,661.0 1,972, 699.0 435.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3105-15 496 6,310,680.0 1,972,702.0 435.00 25.00
3045 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3045-1 497 6,310,689.0 1,972,864.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-2 498 6,310,694.0 1,972, 826.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-3 499 6,310,674.0 1,972, 823.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-4 500 6,310,678.0 1,972, 796.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-5 501 6,310,683.0 1,972, 796.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-6 502 6,310,684.0 1,972, 783.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-7 503 6,310,682.0 1,972, 781.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-8 504 6,310,684.0 1,972, 769.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-9 505 6,310,631.0 1,972, 762.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-10 506 6,310,626.0 1,972, 798.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-11 507 6,310,604.0 1,972, 797.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-12 508 6,310,601.0 1,972, 826.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-13 509 6,310,628.0 1,972, 829.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-14 510 6,310,627.0 1,972, 853.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-15 511 6,310,652.0 1,972, 855.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-16 512 6,310,652.0 1,972, 861.0 444.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3045-17 513 6,310,689.0 1,972,864.0 444.00 25.00
3064 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3064-1 514 6,310,861.0 1,972,938.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 8 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
81 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3064-2 515 6,310,872.0 1,972, 929.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-3 516 6,310,868.0 1,972, 922.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-4 517 6,310,882.0 1,972, 911.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-5 518 6,310,885.0 1,972, 915.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-6 519 6,310,894.0 1,972, 906.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-7 520 6,310,898.0 1,972, 912.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-8 521 6,310,910.0 1,972, 903.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-9 522 6,310,891.0 1,972, 880.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-10 523 6,310,844.0 1,972, 917.0 465.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3064-11 524 6,310,861.0 1,972,938.0 465.00 25.00
130 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 130-1 525 6,310, 996.0 1,972,934.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-2 526 6,310,997.0 1,972, 876.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-3 527 6,310,973.0 1,972, 851.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-4 528 6,310,961.0 1,972, 863.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-5 529 6,310,974.0 1,972, 879.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-6 530 6,310,972.0 1,972, 913.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-7 531 6,310,967.0 1,972, 914.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-8 532 6,310,966.0 1,972, 932.0 454.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 130-9 533 6,310,996.0 1,972,934.0 454.00 25.00
136 SIERRA W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 136-1 534 6,311, 101.0 1,972,920.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-2 535 6,311,104.0 1,972, 900.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-3 536 6,311,091.0 1,972, 898.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-4 537 6,311,094.0 1,972, 871.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-5 538 6,311,102.0 1,972, 871.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-6 539 6,311,104.0 1,972, 850.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-7 540 6,311,099.0 1,972, 845.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-8 541 6,311,105.0 1,972, 839.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-9 542 6,311,101.0 1,972, 827.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-10 543 6,311,096.0 1,972, 829.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-11 544 6,311,083.0 1,972, 798.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-12 545 6,311,054.0 1,972, 813.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-13 546 6,311,068.0 1,972, 845.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-14 547 6,311,058.0 1,972, 847.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-15 548 6,311,050.0 1,972, 856.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-16 549 6,311,052.0 1,972, 868.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-17 550 6,311,065.0 1,972, 873.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-18 551 6,311,063.0 1,972, 901.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-19 552 6,311,060.0 1,972, 901.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-20 553 6,311,058.0 1,972, 916.0 438.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 136-21 554 6,311,101.0 1,972,920.0 438.00 25.00
3039A EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3039A-1 555 6,310,648.0 1,973,006.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039A-2 556 6,310,675.0 1,973, 014.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039A-3 557 6,310,692.0 1,972, 954.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039A-4 558 6,310,666.0 1,972, 946.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039A-5 559 6,310,648.0 1,973,006.0 455.00 25.00
3039B EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3039B-1 560 6,310,658.0 1,973,042.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039B-2 561 6,310,663.0 1,973, 021.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039B-3 562 6,310,580.0 1,973, 004.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 9 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
82 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

INPUT: BARRIERS 21-002
3039B-4 563 6,310,575.0 1,973, 028.0 455.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3039B-5 564 6,310,658.0 1,973,042.0 455.00 25.00
3019 EL KU W 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.00 3019-1 565 6,310,539.0 1,973,145.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-2 566 6,310,557.0 1,973, 132.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-3 567 6,310,532.0 1,973, 100.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-4 568 6,310,443.0 1,973, 100.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-5 569 6,310,443.0 1,973, 126.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-6 570 6,310,462.0 1,973, 128.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-7 571 6,310,465.0 1,973, 137.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-8 572 6,310,485.0 1,973, 137.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-9 573 6,310,485.0 1,973, 129.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-10 574 6,310,525.0 1,973, 130.0 446.00 25.00 0.00 0 0 3019-11 575 6,310,539.0 1,973,145.0 446.00 25.00
CCP-EXIT B 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.0 2.0:1.0 0.00 CCPEX -1 576 6,310,183.0 1,974,491. 04 8 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 00 . 0 0 0 0 CCPEX-2 577 6,310,186.0 1,974,288.0 482.10 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-3 578 6,310,183.0 1,973,978.0 471.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-4 579 6,310,180.0 1,973,827.0 468.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-5 580 6,310,188.0 1,973,659.0 456.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-6 581 6,310,197.0 1,973,534.0 455.80 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-7 582 6,310,237.0 1,973,341.0 455.90 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-8 583 6,310,265.0 1,973,177.0 456.10 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-9 584 6,310,301.0 1,973,031.0 451.80 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-10 585 6,310,349.0 1,972,847.0 446.10 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-11 586 6,310,377.0 1,972,728.0 442.10 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-12 587 6,310,401.0 1,972,618.0 434.60 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-13 588 6,310,429.0 1,972,486.0 427.50 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-14 589 6,310,457.0 1,972,346.0 426.60 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-15 590 6,310,495.0 1,972,148.0 420.50 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-16 591 6,310,521.0 1,971,990.0 412.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-17 592 6,310,549.0 1,971,828.0 405.50 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-18 593 6,310,577.0 1,971,618.0 400.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-19 594 6,310,581.0 1,971,474.0 396.80 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-20 595 6,310,588.0 1,971,438.0 395.40 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-21 596 6,310,780.0 1,971,526.0 385.50 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-22 597 6,311,040.0 1,971,612.0 382.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-23 598 6,311,200.0 1,971,631.0 382.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-24 599 6,311,317.0 1,971,610.0 378.90 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-25 600 6,311,432.0 1,971,580.0 375.70 0.00 0.00 0 0 CCPEX-26 601 6,311,624.0 1,971,393.0 367.50 0.00
I-15 EDGE ROW B 0.00 99.99 0.00 0.0 2.0:1.0 0.00 I15ROW -1 602 6,310,252.0 1,973,167. 94 5 9 . 3 0 0 . 0 00 . 0 0 0 0 I15ROW-2 603 6,310,174.5 1, 973,377.9 467.40 0.00 0.00 0 0 I15ROW-3 604 6,310,078.5 1, 973,623.9 465.40 0.00 0.00 0 0 I15ROW-4 605 6,309,942.0 1, 973,973.0 506.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 I15ROW-5 606 6,309,842.5 1, 974,207.5 547.40 0.00 0.00 0 0 I15ROW-6 607 6,309,701.0 1,974,544.0 578.30 0.00
C:\TNM25\EL KU 10 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
83 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS 21-002
ISE 19 October 2021
R. Tavares Ph.D. TNM 2.5
Calculated with TNM 2.5
RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS
PROJECT/CONTRACT: 21-002
RUN: El Ku Traffic Noise Analysis
BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use
ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.

Receiver
Name No. #DUs Existing No Barrier With Barrier
LAeq1h LAeq1h Increase over existing Type Calculated Noise Reduction Calculated Crit'n Calculated Crit'n Impact LAeq1h Calculated Goal Calculated Sub'l Inc minus
Goal
dBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB
121 F 189 1 0.0 58.1 65 58.1 10 ---- 58.1 0.0 8 -8.0
121 R 191 1 0.0 58.1 65 58.1 10 ---- 58.1 0.0 8 -8.0
123 F 192 1 0.0 57.6 65 57.6 10 ---- 57.6 0.0 8 -8.0
123 R 193 1 0.0 51.7 65 51.7 10 ---- 51.7 0.0 8 -8.0
125 F 194 1 0.0 59.1 65 59.1 10 ---- 59.1 0.0 8 -8.0
125 R 195 1 0.0 55.5 65 55.5 10 ---- 55.5 0.0 8 -8.0
129 F 196 1 0.0 57.6 65 57.6 10 ---- 57.6 0.0 8 -8.0
129 R 197 1 0.0 51.6 65 51.6 10 ---- 51.6 0.0 8 -8.0
130 F 198 1 0.0 67.4 65 67.4 10 Snd Lvl 67.4 0.0 8 -8.0 130 R 199 1 0.0 66.0 65 66.0 10 Snd Lvl 66.0 0.0 8 -8.0 133 F 200 1 0.0 54.4 65 54.4 10 ---- 54.4 0.0 8 -8.0
133 R 201 1 0.0 44.4 65 44.4 10 ---- 44.4 0.0 8 -8.0
136 F 202 1 0.0 61.2 65 61.2 10 ---- 61.2 0.0 8 -8.0
136 R 203 1 0.0 63.5 65 63.5 10 ---- 63.5 0.0 8 -8.0
140 F 204 1 0.0 58.6 65 58.6 10 ---- 58.6 0.0 8 -8.0
140 R 205 1 0.0 45.0 65 45.0 10 ---- 45.0 0.0 8 -8.0
150 F 206 1 0.0 51.5 65 51.5 10 ---- 51.5 0.0 8 -8.0
150 R 207 1 0.0 39.6 65 39.6 10 ---- 39.6 0.0 8 -8.0
154 F 208 1 0.0 56.0 65 56.0 10 ---- 56.0 0.0 8 -8.0
154 R 209 1 0.0 44.0 65 44.0 10 ---- 44.0 0.0 8 -8.0
3014 F 210 1 0.0 71.9 65 71.9 10 Snd Lvl 71.9 0.0 8 -8.0 3014 R 211 1 0.0 65.8 65 65.8 10 Snd Lvl 65.8 0.0 8 -8.0 3018 F 212 1 0.0 66.8 65 66.8 10 Snd Lvl 66.8 0.0 8 -8.0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 1 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
84 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS 21-002
3018 R 213 1 0.0 49.6 65 49.6 10 ---- 49.6 0.0 8 -8.0
3019 F 214 1 0.0 74.6 65 74.6 10 Snd Lvl 74.6 0.0 8 -8.0 3019 R 215 1 0.0 71.2 65 71.2 10 Snd Lvl 71.2 0.0 8 -8.0 3022 F 216 1 0.0 74.5 65 74.5 10 Snd Lvl 74.5 0.0 8 -8.0 3022 R 217 1 0.0 50.0 65 50.0 10 ---- 50.0 0.0 8 -8.0
3026 F 218 1 0.0 74.6 65 74.6 10 Snd Lvl 74.6 0.0 8 -8.0 3026 R 219 1 0.0 60.8 65 60.8 10 ---- 60.8 0.0 8 -8.0
3030 F 220 1 0.0 67.6 65 67.6 10 Snd Lvl 67.6 0.0 8 -8.0 3030 R 221 1 0.0 48.5 65 48.5 10 ---- 48.5 0.0 8 -8.0
3032 F 222 1 0.0 74.7 65 74.7 10 Snd Lvl 74.7 0.0 8 -8.0 3032 R 223 1 0.0 47.0 65 47.0 10 ---- 47.0 0.0 8 -8.0
3034 F 224 1 0.0 66.9 65 66.9 10 Snd Lvl 66.9 0.0 8 -8.0 3034 R 225 1 0.0 46.1 65 46.1 10 ---- 46.1 0.0 8 -8.0
3039 F 226 1 0.0 75.7 65 75.7 10 Snd Lvl 75.7 0.0 8 -8.0 3039 R 227 1 0.0 74.4 65 74.4 10 Snd Lvl 74.4 0.0 8 -8.0 3042 F 228 1 0.0 71.0 65 71.0 10 Snd Lvl 71.0 0.0 8 -8.0 3042 R 229 1 0.0 46.8 65 46.8 10 ---- 46.8 0.0 8 -8.0
3045 F 230 1 0.0 75.8 65 75.8 10 Snd Lvl 75.8 0.0 8 -8.0 3045 R 231 1 0.0 76.0 65 76.0 10 Snd Lvl 76.0 0.0 8 -8.0 3046 F 232 1 0.0 51.1 65 51.1 10 ---- 51.1 0.0 8 -8.0
3046 R 233 1 0.0 41.8 65 41.8 10 ---- 41.8 0.0 8 -8.0
3064 F 234 1 0.0 71.0 65 71.0 10 Snd Lvl 71.0 0.0 8 -8.0 3064 R 235 1 0.0 64.6 65 64.6 10 ---- 64.6 0.0 8 -8.0
3105 F 236 1 0.0 76.2 65 76.2 10 Snd Lvl 76.2 0.0 8 -8.0 3105 R 237 1 0.0 76.8 65 76.8 10 Snd Lvl 76.8 0.0 8 -8.0 3112 F 238 1 0.0 69.4 65 69.4 10 Snd Lvl 69.4 0.0 8 -8.0 3112 R 239 1 0.0 51.6 65 51.6 10 ---- 51.6 0.0 8 -8.0
3115 F 240 1 0.0 74.7 65 74.7 10 Snd Lvl 74.7 0.0 8 -8.0 3115 R 241 1 0.0 76.2 65 76.2 10 Snd Lvl 76.2 0.0 8 -8.0 3127 F 242 1 0.0 77.8 65 77.8 10 Snd Lvl 77.8 0.0 8 -8.0 3127 R 243 1 0.0 78.7 65 78.7 10 Snd Lvl 78.7 0.0 8 -8.0 3133 F 244 1 0.0 72.9 65 72.9 10 Snd Lvl 72.9 0.0 8 -8.0 3133 R 245 1 0.0 69.1 65 69.1 10 Snd Lvl 69.1 0.0 8 -8.0 3136 F 246 1 0.0 68.6 65 68.6 10 Snd Lvl 68.6 0.0 8 -8.0 3136 R 247 1 0.0 65.3 65 65.3 10 Snd Lvl 65.3 0.0 8 -8.0 3137 F 248 1 0.0 75.2 65 75.2 10 Snd Lvl 75.2 0.0 8 -8.0 3137 R 249 1 0.0 75.5 65 75.5 10 Snd Lvl 75.5 0.0 8 -8.0 3141 F 250 1 0.0 69.0 65 69.0 10 Snd Lvl 69.0 0.0 8 -8.0 3141 R 251 1 0.0 67.2 65 67.2 10 Snd Lvl 67.2 0.0 8 -8.0 3145 F 252 1 0.0 73.9 65 73.9 10 Snd Lvl 73.9 0.0 8 -8.0 C:\TNM25\EL KU 2 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
85 Item 8.

Mr. Douglas Shultz
Acoustical Impact Assessment
El Ku Avenue Residential Communi ty – Escondido, CA
ISE Project #21-002
20 October 2021

RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS 21-002
3145 R 253 1 0.0 74.3 65 74.3 10 Snd Lvl 74.3 0.0 8 -8.0 3148 F 254 1 0.0 67.4 65 67.4 10 Snd Lvl 67.4 0.0 8 -8.0 3148 R 255 1 0.0 63.2 65 63.2 10 ---- 63.2 0.0 8 -8.0
3154 F 256 1 0.0 60.8 65 60.8 10 ---- 60.8 0.0 8 -8.0
3154 R 257 1 0.0 54.2 65 54.2 10 ---- 54.2 0.0 8 -8.0
3155 F 258 1 0.0 68.7 65 68.7 10 Snd Lvl 68.7 0.0 8 -8.0 3155 R 259 1 0.0 69.8 65 69.8 10 Snd Lvl 69.8 0.0 8 -8.0 3164 F 260 1 0.0 65.0 65 65.0 10 Snd Lvl 65.0 0.0 8 -8.0 3164 R 261 1 0.0 53.5 65 53.5 10 ---- 53.5 0.0 8 -8.0
CUL-DE-SAC (TEST PT) 262 1 0.0 66.6 65 66.6 10 Snd Lvl 66.6 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction
Min Avg Max
dB dB dB
All Selected 73 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Impacted 40 0.0 0.0 0.0
All that meet NR Goal 00 . 0 0 . 00 . 0
C:\TNM25\EL KU 3 19 October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
86 Item 8.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0600-10, A3398

SUBJECT

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN PASQUAL UNDERGROUNDING

PROJECT -

DEPARTMENT
Utilities Department, Construction and Engineering Division

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-17, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement with the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Utilities: Christopher W. McKinney)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no fee associated with th e Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement for the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project (“Project”). Funds for the construction of the Project are available in the Water CIP No. 701701.

PREVIOUS ACTION
On June 3, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2009 -77, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a consulting agreement with Black & Vea tch Corporation in the amount of $232,710.00, for engineering services to perform a study investigating the feasibility of undergrounding a portion of the Escondido Canal between Lake Henshaw and Lake Wohlford, within the San Pasqual Indian Reservation.

On November 2, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016 -156, adopting the Environmental Assessment/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project (ENV 15-0016).

On June 13, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-94, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a consulting agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc., in the amount of $1,563,297.50, for the design of the Project. On June 29, 2018, a First Amendment with Michael Baker International, Inc. was executed to add prevailing wage and Department of Industrial Relations language to the original consulting agreement. No cost was associated with the First Amendment.

87 Item 9.

On June 13, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-95, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a consulting agreement with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. , in the amount of $100,000 , for environmental consulting services.

On May 22, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019 -79, authorizing a proposed Agreement among the City of Escondido, Vista Irrigation District, and the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for Conveyance of an Easement necessary for the Project.

On May 26, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -71, authorizing the Deputy City Manager/Director of Utilities to submit an application to IBank requesting $25 million in financing (the “Obligation”) for the Project, declaring the City of Esco ndido’s (“City’s”) intent to reimburse IBank, and approving certain related matters to the financing application.

On August 25, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -120, authorizing Authorized Officers (as such term is defined in Section 3 o f Resolution No. 2021 -120) to execute, on behalf of the City, an Installment Sale Agreement (a type of Financing Agreement) with the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (“IBank”) for $25 million in funding for the Project.

On October 13, 2021, the City Council: 1) a dopted Resolution No. 2021 -121, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Public Improvement Agreement, in the amount of $31,712,890, with Sukut Construction, LLC, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for constr uction of the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project; 2) adopted Resolution No. 2021-122, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Second Amendment to the Consulting Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc., in the amount of $727,633, for engineering services during construction of the Project; 3) adopted Resolution No. 2021-123, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Consulting Agreement in the amount of $2,165,993 with Arcadis U.S. Inc., for construction management services for the Project; 4) adopted Resolution No. 2021-162, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Mitigation and Monitoring Agreement with the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for Native American monitoring activities, and the protection of Native American cultural resources during the Project construction; and 5) approved a Budget Adjustment in the amount of $28,000,000.

BACKGROUND
The Project will remove, relocate, and replace approximately 2.5 miles of the Escondido Canal that crosses the San Pasqual Indian Reservation. One of the primary element s of the Project consists of the construction of a new desilting basin and associated access road on the San Pasqual Indian Reservation along the existing Escondido Canal alignment where the canal first enters the northern edge of the Reservation.

88 Item 9.

Due to steep elevations and rugged terrain of the area, retaining walls are required adjacent to the desilting basin and desilting basin access road, and a portion of the access road will be in a tunnel. During design it was determined that the most efficient and economical method to construct the access road tunnel was by open -cutting the ground, installing the tunnel structure, then backfilling over the tunnel structure. Excavations for the walls and tunnel may be up to 30 feet deep. In order to safely excavate to these depths, construction will temporarily encroach out of the existing easements onto the San Pasqual Indian Reservation. The San Pasqual Band agrees with this approach and requests the execution of the Temporary Construction Permit and Agree ment for the Project. The Utilities Department recommends entering into a Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement with the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for the Project.

RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution No. 2022-17
b. Resolution No. 2022-17 – Exhibit “A”: Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement for the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project

89 Item 9.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-17

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR

TO EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, A TEMPORARY

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND AGREEMENT FOR THE

SAN PASQUAL UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Escondido (“City”) desires to construct the San Pasqual Undergrounding Project (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project will remove, relocate, and replace approximately 2.5 miles of the Escondido Canal that crosses the San Pasqual Indian Reservation and consists of three major components:
constructing a new desilting basin and associated access road , replacing a portion of the existing canal with a box culvert, and placing new pipeline underground; and WHEREAS, due to steep elevations and rugged terrain, excavation for the desilting basin and associated access road will temporarily extend outside of the existing easements onto the San Pasqual Indian Reservation during construction; and
WHEREAS, a Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement would allow the construction of the desilting basin and associated access road to temporarily extend outside of the existing easements onto the San Pasqual Indian Reservation; and
WHEREAS, City staff have completed negotiations with the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians for said Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement and the Deputy City Manager / Director of Utilities recommends that the Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement (“Agreement”) be entered into; and
90 Item 9.

WHEREAS, this City Council desires at this time and deems it to be in the best public interes t to enter into said Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California:

1. That the above recitations are true.

2. That the Mayor and City Council accepts the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager / Director of Utilities.

3. That the City Council approves Resolution No. 2022-17.

4. That the Mayor is authorized to execute, on behalf of the City, a Temporary Construction Permit and Agreement with The San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians in substantially the same format as Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney.
91 Item 9.

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND AGREEMENT
This Construction Permit and Agreement ( “Permit”) is entered into as of , 2022 (“Effective Date”) by and between the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians, a Federally-recognized Indian tribe (“ Tribe”) and the City of Escondido, a California municipal corporation (“City”).

RECITALS:

A. The San Pasqual Underground Project ( “SPUP”) is a component pursuant to S ection 6 of the Settlement Agreement between the United States and the La Jolla, Rincon, Pala, Pauma, and San Pasqual Bands of Mission Indians and the San Luis Rey Indian Water Authority and the City of Escondido and Vista Irrigation District dated December 8, 2014 ( “Settlement Agreement ”) and Article V.5.C of Exhibit A of the Settlement Agreement. The SPUP will remove, relocate, and replace with an underground pipeline most or all of that portion of the Escondido Canal and its appurtenant structures, facilities, and rights-of-way that currently occupy Tribal land and reclaim land occupied by the replaced canal as shown in the SPUP Plans and San Pasqual Undergrounding Project Existing Canal Abandonment Plans on file with the City (“Project Plans”).

B. As part of the SPUP, the City will construct a road and tunnel structure that will provide access to a desilting basin as depicted and described in Exhibit “A” to this Permit which are attached hereto and incorporate by this reference.

C. The City was granted a thirty-foot- wide right-of-way easement dated December 19, 2016, document identification number 589077Y17, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference, for the purposes of construction, access, and maintenance of said improvements.

D. For the City to construct the desilting basin and desilting basin access road and tunnel per the approved Project Plans, additional area beyond the granted easement is required.

Said additional area is shown and described in Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the following promises, covenants, and agreements, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by both parties hereto, the parties hereby agree as follows:

AGREEMENT:

1. Grant of Permit. The Tribe hereby grants the City a temporary construction permit for the area shown and described in Exhibit A from the Effective Date of this Permit until May 17, 2023, pursuant to 5.C.4 of the Implementing Agreement among the City, as successor to the Escondido Mutual Water Company; Vista Irrigation District ; San Luis Rey River Indian Water Authority ; and the La Jolla, Rincon, San Pasqual, Pauma, and Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

92 Item 9.

Pala Bands of Mission Indians dated December 5, 2014.

2. Permit Conditions. This Permit shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit B, the Grant of Right-of-Way Identification No. 589077Y17, dated December 19, 2016.

3. Indemnification. The City shall indemnify and hold the Tribe, its Tribal Council, and its members, contractors, agents, consultants, and employees harmless from any liability for damage caused by the acts or omissions of the City or any of its employees, contractors, or agents in carrying out SPUP work within the areas shown and described in Exhibit A to this Permit. The City shall reimburse the Tribe for any damage caused in carrying out SPUP work within the areas shown and described in Exhibit A to this Permit or, in the alternative, repair any damage caused in carrying out SPUP work within the areas shown and described in Exhibit A to this Permit.

4. Waiver of Payment. The Tribe hereby waives any right to payment from City for this Permit.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Permit as of the Effective Date set forth above.

SAN PAS

QUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Date
: __________________ ___________________________________ Stephen Cope, San Pasqual Chairman

CITY OF E

SCONDIDO
Date
: __________________ ___________________________________ Paul McNamara, Mayor
APPR
OVED AS TO FORM:

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MICHAEL R. MCGUINNESS, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: ___
__________________________
Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

93 Item 9.

EXHIBIT “A”
Plat and Legal Description
Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

94 Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

95 Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

96 Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

97 Item 9.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA
Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

98 Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

99 Item 9.

EXHIBIT “B”
Existing Right-of-Way Easement
Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

100
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

101
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

102
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

103
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

104
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

105
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

106
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

107
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

108
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

109
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

110
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

111
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

112
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

113
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

114
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

115
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

116
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

117
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

118
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

119
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

120
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

121
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

122
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

123
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

124
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

125
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

126
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

127
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

128
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

129
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

130
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

131
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

132
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

133
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

134
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

135
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

136
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

137
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

138
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

139
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

140
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

141
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

142
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

143
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

144
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

145
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

146
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

147
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

148
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

149
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

150
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

151
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

152
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

153
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

154
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

155
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

156
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

157
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

158
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

159
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

160
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

161
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

162
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

163
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

164
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

165
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

166
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

167
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

168
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

169
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

170
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

171
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

172
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

173
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

174
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

175
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

176
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

177
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

178
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

179
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

180
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

181
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

182
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

183
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

184
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

185
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

186
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

187
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

188
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

189
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

190
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

191
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

192
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

193
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

194
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

195
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

196
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

197
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

198
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

199
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

200
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

201
Item 9.

Resolution No. 2022-17
Exhibit "A"

202
Item 9.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0260-05

SUBJECT

PARK AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE

DEPARTMENT
Community Services – Older Adult Services

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council receive and file an update on the programs and activities at the Park Avenue Community Center, home of the Escondido Senior Center.

Staff Recommendation: Receive and File (Community Services: Joanna Axelrod)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
None.

PREVIOUS ACTION
None.

BACKGROUND
The Park Avenue Community Center (“PACC”) is one of the largest and most active centers in North San Diego County serving approximately 500 seniors each week. Originally named the Joslyn Senior Center for the Joslyn Foundation’s benefactor who contributed a $75,000 grant in 1973, PACC has a long, rich history of engagement with Escondido seniors beginning in 1958 with the formation of the Escondido Senior Center Club. The City provided almost four acres of land and a small four-bedroom house in an effort to see the group thrive as a social outlet for older adults. While the programs and services have changed substantially since then, the core mission to serve as a community gathering spot to bring people together for social interaction and provide access to information and resources remains true today.

Over the years, the PACC campus has grown to include the main building, senior nutrition building (also known as the Park Avenue Café) , shuffleboard building, and the Dorothy E . Boeger Building. These facilities house a wide variety of programs, services, activities, and volunteer opportunities for the seniors in the community. Historically services to the seniors were limited to daytime hours , leaving the facility underutilized on evenings and weekends. In an effort to increase usage and appeal to the younger senior, the Joslyn Senior Center expanded its operating hou rs and rebranded to the Park Avenue Community Center, Home of the Escondido Senior Center in 2012.
203
Item 10.

The City currently oversees the operation and upkeep of the campus facilities while offering direct services and partnership opportunities with local nonprofit organizations that provide resources, activities, and services that benefit older adults 55+.

The PACC houses two City divisions – Older Adult Services and Senior Nutrition/Transportation . Older Adult Services is staffed by two full-time and three part-time professionals who provide programming and services including, but not limited to, art and cooking programs, movie and music events, exercise classes, the largest a billiards room in North County host to quarterly tournaments, resource fairs, guest speaker series that covers topics such as avoiding scams and tips for staying safe , a monthly newsle tter, special holiday events, and resource connections. They also facilitate rentals of the community rooms in the Center for the general public and many local organizations in the community.

The Senior Nutrition/Transportation division is staffed by one full-time and two part-time professionals who run the congregate meal program which provides a hot, nutritionally balanced meal Monday through Friday, and includes transportation to and from the Center. In addition to paid staff, the PACC is dependent on ma ny volunteers who assist each day with serving meals, supporting activities, greeting arrivals, and more.

As a further expansion of services, PACC staff also partner with various nonprofit organizations that specifically support seniors. Organizations such as Oasis, the Senior Service Council, and Senior Enterprises operate out of the Center and offer a one-stop service point providing programs and opportunities for seniors that City staff alone would not be able to offer. These groups provide local day and overnight trips; groceries and food resources ; transportation (taxi) program for doctor’s visits ; income tax support ; enrichment and technology classes ; legal aid and notary services ; and health, hearing, and dental screenings. The San Diego Food Bank also runs a monthly distribution of their Senior Food Program on - site at the Center. This network of resources provide the necessary support structure for older adults to live independently and remain vital, active members of the community.

It is projected that by 2030 San Diego County will have more than 1.2 million older adults (55+). This will likely result in more diverse service needs than what has been traditionally offered and could place greater demands on existing staff and infrastructure. In looking to the future, the Park Avenue Community Center is prepared to meet th ose needs through carefully crafted service offerings and expanded partnerships that address the vitality, social connectedness, and expectations of those individuals. It is necessary to identify th ose characteristics that will draw younger seniors to the facility and connect them with innovative programs, active classes, and vital r esources. In doing so, we build a community center that supports and cares for society’s most vulnerable in a positive, holistic, and wellness-centric manner. 204
Item 10.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2021
File Number 0680-50

SUBJECT
AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 32, SUBDIVISIONS

DEPARTMENT
Engineering Services

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 2022 -02 amending Chapter 32, Subdivisions, of the Escondido Municipal Code to clarify and streamline the approval process for final maps in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Engineering: J. Procopio)

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There are no fiscal impacts to the City of Escondido (“City”) associated with this Code amendment. The cost of processing subdivision maps is paid for by the project applicant in accordance with the adopted fee schedule.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA)
The proposed updates to the Chapter 32, Subdivisions are solely changes to the City’s administrative processes, under the authority provided by state law. The proposed Ordinance consists of administrative activities of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment. Thus, the Ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5).

PREVIOUS ACTION
None.

BACKGROUND
Updates to Chapter 32 of the Municipal Code are recommended to clarify the procedure and clearly designate the approval authority for actions related to subdivision s of land . To add clarity for project applicants, a list of the tentative map application requirements have been added to the Code.

Clear designations of the advisory agency responsible for review and decisions have been added to the Code. The Planning Commission continues to be the advisory agency responsible for tentative subdivision 205
Item 11.

maps, including conditions of project approval. The Director of Community Development or the City Engineer are designated for more routine actions that includ e boundary adjustments, time extensions, substantial compliance determinations, environmental certifications , map corrections, improvement agreements, acceptance of completed public improvements, and release of securities . These proposed designations are consistent with past practices.

In addition to these clarifications, staff recommends that the approval process for final maps be streamlined by delegating approval authority to the C ity Engineer . Tentative maps and other entitlements, including conditions of development approval, would continue to be considered by the City Council or other existing designated approval body. While final maps have traditionally been approved on consent by the City Council, the approval of a final map is a ministerial action. If the final map conforms to the requirements of the tentative map, Municipal Code, and Subdivision Map Act, the final map must be approved. The Subdivision Map Act allows cities to delegate, via an ordinance, authority for approval of final maps, execution of subdivision improvement agreements, accepting or rejection of dedications, and the release or reduction of securities to the City Engineer , or other designated official. (See Government Code sections 66458(d) [authority for designated official to approve final maps and accept or reject dedications], 66462(d) [authority for designated official to enter into subdivision improvement agreement], 66463(b) [authority for designated official to approve parcel maps and accept or reject dedications], 66499.7(j) [authority for public officer or employee to release or reduce security].) The key benefit to delegating approval of final maps and execution of subdivision improvement agreements is that the process will be shortened and made more efficient. This is particularly important as tax certificates for final maps often expire at the end of a calendar year, a time when Council meetings are less frequent. The City Council will be notified of the filing of a final map allowing its approval within 10 days. Final map approval or disapproval may be appealed for a decision by the City Council.

The proposed ordinance will also clarify procedures for tentative map applications, pursuant to Government Code section 66452, which provides that a city’s local ordinance governs such procedures.

ORDINANCES
a. Ordinance No. 2022-02

206
Item 11.

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-02

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 32 OF

THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SUBDIVISIONS

The City Council of the City of Escondido, California, does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council makes the following findings:
a. That the City of Escondido ( “City”) is subject to the requirements of Subdivision Map Act; and
b. That the Subdivision Map Act allows the City to delegate authority for approval of final maps, execution of subdivision improvement agreements, accepting or rejection of dedications, and the release or reduction of securities to the City Engineer, or other designated official, pursuant to Government Code sections 66458(d), 66462(d), 66463(d), and 66499.7(j). c. That the amendments to Escondido Municipal Code Chapter 32 pertaining to Subdivisions as proposed by this Ordinance reflect revisions necessary to align with the Subdivision Map Act.

SECTION 2. That upon consideration of the staff report, City Staff recommendation, and the findings set forth in Section 3 this Ordinance, this City Council finds th at adoption of the proposed Municipal Amendments to Chapter 32 pertaining to Subdivisions are in the best interest of the City.

SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The proposed Ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5), as the proposed updates are solely changes to the City’s administrative processes, under the authority provided by state law, and consist of administrative activities of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

SECTION 4. That Chapter 32 of the Escondido Municipal Code is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 207
Item 11.

SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.

SECTION 6. As of the effective date of this Ordinance, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Renumbering and relabeling of existing ordinance title, chapter, article, and/or section headings by this ordinance does not affect the continuing validity of existing laws.

Any existing reference to an ordinance, title, chapter, article, or section headi ng which is renumbered or relabeled by this ordinance must be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contained within this ordinance.

SECTION 7. The adoption of this Ordinance is not intended to affect or disrupt the continuity of the City’s business or administration of its law, including but not limited to the following:
a. Actions and proceedings that began before the effective date of this Ordinance; b. Prosecution for ordinance violations committed before the effective date of this Ordinance; and/or
c. The amount, or collection, of license, fee, penalty debt, forfeiture, or obligations due and unpaid as of the effective date of this Ordinance.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same or a summary to be prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, to be published one time within 15 days of its passage in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the County and circulated in the City of Escondido.

SECTION 9. This Ordinance shall become effective on the 30th day following the date of its adoption.
208
Item 11.

Chapter 32 Subdivisions, Article 1 General Provisions

32.101. TITLE AND APPLICABILITY

32.101.01. TITLE
This Chapter 32 shall be known as the “Escondido Subdivision Code.” (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9- 11-96)

32.101.02. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT
The City of Escondido hereby adopts the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code of the State of California) hereafter “Map Act,” as amended, by reference. The provisions of the Map Act shall apply to all divisions of land occurring within the City of Escondido and the City’s General Plan area under a concurrent annexation and pre-zoning request or as specifically authorized by the City Council. Whenever any provision of this chapter is in conflict with any provision of the Map Act, the Map Act shall supersede this chapter. This chapter clarifies processes and requirements specific to the City of Escondido. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.101.03. OTHER LAWS
Any division of land to which this chapter applies shall also be subject to the requirements of any other federal, state or local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations otherwise applicable to such division. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.101.04. APPLICATIONS WITHIN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO JURISDICTION Map applications for property within the County of San Diego shall only be accepted with the approval of the City Council and the concurrent submittal of a pre-zoning and annexation request. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.102. DEFINITIONS
Words used in this chapter, which are defined in the Map Act but not specifically defined in this chapter, shall have the same meaning as they do in the Map Act. Words used in this chapter which are not defined in this chapter or in the Map Act shall have the same meaning as in the Escondido Zoning Code. Whenever the following words are used in this chapter, they shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this division.

ADJUSTMENT PLAT: An adjustment to the property lot line(s) between two (2) or more existing lots by means of a plat prepared pursuant to Division 32.402 of this chapter and certified by the Director of Planning and Building as having been approved pursuant to this chapter and filed in the Planning Division.

ADVISORY AGENCY: As the term is used in the Map Act (including Map Act section 66415) or this chapter, the advisory agency shall be defined as follows:
(i) the Planning Commission is hereby designated as the advisory agency as to the final review and decision for Tentative Subdivision Maps pursuant to section 32.105.03; (ii) the Director of Community Development is hereby designated as the advisory agency as to certificates of compliance pursuant to section 32.404.03, boundary adjustments, substantial compliance, environmental document certification (including environmental impact report addenda, mitigated negative declarations and categorical exemptions) pursuant to section 32.105.02, tentative map and tentative parcel map extensions of time pursuant to section 32.210.02, tentative map Ordinance No.2022-02
Exhibit A

209
Item 11.
modification pursuant to section 32.211, minor modifications of design standards pursuant to section

32.105.05; and
(iii) the City Engineer is hereby designated as the advisory agency as to the approval of Final Maps, Parcel Maps, minor modifications of design standards, Final and Parcel Map modifications and corrections, abandonment of public easements granted without remuneration, plan approval, acceptance of improvements as complete, filing of notices of completion, release of security pursuant to section 32.205.03, and the approval and execution of improvement agreements subject to this chapter, including pursuant to section 32.205.01.

CEQA: The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000— 21177, and the state CEQA Guidelines for implementation prescribed by the Secretary for Resources.

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: A document describing a unit or contiguous units of real property and stating that the division thereof complies or conditionally complies with applicable provisions of the Map Act and City ordinances enacted pursuant thereto.

CERTIFIED MAP: A revised tentative map incorporating all modifications and changes required by the Tentative Subdivision Map or Tentative Parcel Map approval, which is determined by the Planning Division to be in substantial conformance with the tentative map approval.

CITY ENGINEER: As used in this chapter, City Engineer shall mean the City Engineer of the City of Escondido or their authorized representative.

COMPLETE APPLICATION: Submittal of an application with all information required to evaluate conformance with the General Plan and Zoning Code.

DENSITY: The number of residential dwelling units per acre of lot area excluding areas of remainder parcels, areas of nonresidential development, the panhandle portion of a flag lot, and areas of dedication for street rights-of-way, adjustments for floodways as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA — see Flooding Map) or the City, slope categories, and other environmental factors as designated.

DISCRETIONARY ACTION: The review process which requires consideration of and action on a request at a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council, including but not limited to, tentative subdivision maps, variances, zone changes, general plan amendments, conditional use permits, zoning code amendments, development agreements, planned development proposals, annexations, and condominium permits.

FINAL MAP: A final map prepared pursuant to Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Map Act in accordance with the approved or conditionally approved tentative map.

IMPROVEMENT, ON-SITE AND/OR OFF-SITE: In addition to its definition in Section 66419 of the Map Act, all those items necessary to satisfy the needs of the subdivision including, but not limited to, local neighborhood traffic, drainage, flood control, fire protection, sanitation and water requirements as a condition prior to the approval of a Final Map or Parcel Map.

INFILL DEVELOPMENT: Development that occurs on contiguous vacant lots scattered within areas that are already predominantly developed or urbanized to the highest intensity allowed by the Zoning designation and the General Plan.

LEGISLATIVE BODY: The City Council is the legislative body of the City of Escondido.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

210
Item 11.

LOT AREA: The horizontal area within the boundary lines of a lot.

NET LOT AREA: The horizontal area within the boundary lines of a lot exclusive of:

• The area of any street or alley right-of-way, dedication, offer of dedication, and road easements.

• Any fenced flood-control easement.

• Any portion of the lot which is less than thirty-five (35) feet wide for a distance of fifty (50) feet or more and which is designed or used to provide vehicular or pedestrian access to the part of such lot which is designed for use as a building site.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

211
Item 11.
[Images]

MAP ACT: The Subdivision Map Act as set forth in Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code (Sections 66400 et seq.) of the State of California.

PANHANDLE LOT: A lot having access to a street by a narrow extension of the lot.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

212
Item 11.

PARCEL MAP: A map prepared pursuant to Chapter 2, Article 3 of the Map Act in accordance with the approved or conditionally approved tentative map.

REMAINDER PARCEL: That portion of land which is not divided for the purpose of sale, lease, or financing when only a portion of real property is subdivided, which meets the minimum development standards of the General Plan and Zoning Code as if it were a lot.

RESIDENT PURCHASE OF A MOBILEHOME PARK: The purchase by existing residents of a mobilehome park for the purpose of conversion to a mobilehome condominium project, mobilehome stock cooperative or any similar project where the member of the project owns a home ownership share, fee lot, or condominium unit.

SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE: A determination by the Director of Planning and Building that a revised map complies with the conditions of the map approval where no additional grading exemptions, units, property, or parcels are involved, the approved minimum lot size is maintained, no significant environmental impact is created, and the revisions are consistent with the character of the original approval.

THROUGH LOT: A lot having a frontage on two (2) parallel or approximately parallel streets.

YIELD: The maximum allowable number of dwelling units permitted for a proposed subdivision, reflective of all General Plan and Zoning Code criteria. The yield is the sum of the density calculations for all lot area within each General Plan Land Use Designation and slope category and/or other constrained land category. For the purpose of calculating yield, the lot area excludes the area of remainder parcels, areas of nonresidential development, and ultimate Circulation Element street rights-of-way, and includes the area of any interior noncirculation element streets.

See “Yield Example.”

ZONING CODE: The Escondido Zoning Code, Chapter 33 of the Escondido Municipal Code. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96; Ord. No. 2020-31R, § 6, 1-13-21) Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

213
Item 11.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

214
Item 11.

[Image]

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

215
Item 11.

32.103. RESPONSIBILITIES

The City Council and/or the advisory agency as designated in Division 32.102, or the authorized representative, is empowered and directed to carry out the duties assigned by this chapter including, but not limited to:

A. Investigate each application.

B. Consider the recommendations of:

1. The City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building, or their authorized representatives, with respect to the design of the proposed subdivision and the kind, nature, and extent of the proposed on-site and off-site improvements; and

2. The Fire Chief, the Chief of Police, and other City departments, public agencies and public and private utilities, or their authorized representatives, with respect to the availability of service and the kind, nature, and extent of necessary improvements.

C. Consider the matters set forth in Chapter 4 of the Map Act and make findings in accordance with Division 32.209 of this chapter.

D. Take an action or make a recommendation on the application.

E. Prescribe or recommend the kind, nature and extent of the improvements to be constructed or installed. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.104. FEES

All applications or other filings required or permitted by this chapter, or by the Map Act, shall be accompanied by a fee to be established by resolution of City Council. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11- 96)

32.105. REVIEW PROCESS—GENERAL

32.105.01. MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS

Any discretionary action needed to achieve conformance to the General Plan or the Zoning Code shall be processed concurrently with the application required or permitted by this chapter. Where one or more actions requires the approval of the Planning Commission, then all actions shall be taken by the Planning Commission. When one or more actions require the approval of the City Council, then all actions shall be taken by the City Council. The effective date of any action on a tentative map shall be concurrent with the associated discretionary application. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.105.02. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND BUILDING REVIEW

The Director of Planning and Building or his designated representative shall review applications for completeness and shall prepare the appropriate environmental document pursuant to CEQA and the Administration and Enforcement division of the Zoning Code. Upon consideration of the application, comments from other city departments, other agencies or utilities, and other available information, the Director of Planning and Building shall take an action or make a recommendation as follows:

A. Action. The Director shall approve, conditionally approve or deny a Tentative Parcel Map, Adjustment Plat, or Certificate of Compliance, and shall make such findings as may be required by Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

216
Item 11.
the Map Act and this chapter. The Director shall provide written notification to the applicant of the decision on the application.

B. Recommendation. The Director shall submit written recommendations concerning a Tentative Subdivision Map to the Planning Commission, and recommendations concerning a Reversion to Acreage to the City Council, for consideration at a public hearing. For projects requiring potential condemnation, the Director shall provide written notification to the City Council prior to consideration by the Planning Commission. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.105.03. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW

A. Action. The Planning Commission shall hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map. The Planning Commission shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application, and shall make such findings as are required by the Map Act and this chapter. The Commission shall file a resolution of its action with the City Clerk within five (5) days of the action.

B. Recommendation. When an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map is accompanied by a request for a discretionary review which requires action by the City Council, the Planning Commission shall submit written recommendations to the City Council for consideration at a public hearing. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.105.04. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW

A. Action. The City Council shall hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider an application or a Reversion to Acreage or a Tentative Subdivision Map accompanied by a request for a discretionary review which requires action by the City Council. The City Council shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application and shall make such findings as are required by the Map Act and this chapter. The City Council may also refer an application back to staff or the Planning Commission without taking an action.

B. Resolution. The City Council shall file a resolution indicating the action taken on the application, and the findings made by the City Council as required by the Map Act and this chapter. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.105.05. WAIVER OR MODIFICATION OF REGULATIONS

When the approval body or official of a proposed subdivision, as specified in Division 32.105 and

32.303, finds that it is impossible or impractical for the subdivider to conform fully to the design and improvement requirements of this chapter due to unusual conditions related to size, shape, topography, proposed use, or title limitations of record affecting the real property to be divided, that approval body may waive or modify these requirements provided that this waiver or modification shall be in conformity with the requirements of the Map Act and the spirit and purpose of this chapter. Reasonable conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the approval body or official may be imposed. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.106. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

32.106.01. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. Notice of required public hearings shall be given as provided in the Administration and Enforcement division of the Zoning Code. The Director of Planning and Building may give such other notice as deemed necessary or advisable.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

217
Item 11.

B. In the case of a conversion of residential real property to a condominium project, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project, the subdivider shall give all notices required by the Map Act. In addition, the subdivider shall be responsible for expenses incurred by the City in giving notice as required by Sections 66427.1, 66451.3, 66452.3 and 66452.5(e), or any successor section or replacement sections of the California Government Code. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.106.02. NOTICE OF INTENDED DECISION

A Notice of Intended Decision shall be given as provided in the Administration and Enforcement division of the Zoning Code for Tentative Parcel Maps. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.106.03. LETTER OF ACTION

A letter detailing the action taken on an application and any conditions of approval shall be provided to the applicant for Adjustment Plats, Certificates of Compliance, minor map modifications, and correction and amendments of recorded maps. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.107. APPEALS

A. If the subdivider or any interested person is dissatisfied with an action of the Director of Planning and Building, or Planning Commission with respect to a subdivision related application, the subdivider or such interested person may file a written appeal as provided in the Map Act and the Administration and Enforcement division of the Zoning Code.

B. An appeal shall not be deemed filed unless and until a fee, established by resolution of the City Council has been paid, to cover the costs of processing and noticing the appeal. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

218
Item 11.

Chapter 32 Subdivisions, Article 2 Tentative Maps

32.201. APPLICATIONS

32.201.01. SUBMITTALS

A. Application Package. Applications for the development of a subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Division on a City application form, together with all fees, plans, maps, technical studies, and any other information required by the Division to determine and conduct the appropriate environmental process required, potential condemnation for off-site improvements, and whether the proposed project is consistent with federal and state requirements, the Escondido General Plan, and City codes and policies. A Tentative Parcel Map application shall be required for all subdivisions for which a Tentative Subdivision Map is not required by Map Act Section 66426 et seq., or as otherwise permitted by this chapter. All related discretionary and/or administrative applications necessary for evaluating the project’s compliance with required findings shall be submitted concurrently.

B. Map Requirements. Tentative Maps shall be prepared by or under the direction of a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer. Tentative Maps shall clearly show all information required by this Article, and shall be drawn to an engineer’s scale of not less than one inch equals 40 feet. The Tentative Map shall contain all of the following:

1. The tract number.

2. Sufficient legal description of the property to define its boundaries.

3. Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the record owner, subdivider, and person preparing the map.

4. North point, engineering scale, date, and area.

5. The widths and approximate locations of all existing and proposed public easements or rights of way, or private street easements, within and adjacent to the property involved.

6. Locations, widths, and approximate grades of existing and proposed highways, streets, or alleys, whether public or private, within and adjacent to the property involved.

7. Existing street names, and the names or designations for all proposed streets and highways.

8. Approximate radii of all center line curves for streets, highways, or alleys.

9. Lot layout, approximate dimensions of each lot, lot size and number of each lot.

10. The locations of potentially dangerous areas, including geologically hazardous areas and areas subject to inundation or flood hazard; the location, width, and direction of flow of all watercourses, flood control channels, and mud or debris paths where ravines or swales will exist within and adjacent to the property involved; building setbacks from such hazards and the proposed method of providing flood, erosion, and mud or debris control; and areas where access and emergency paths will be located in the event flood design capacity is exceeded. Lot lines shall be located so that the flow of watercourses and mud and debris paths, access and emergency paths, and setbacks shall be adjacent to lot lines or in areas of restrictions against construction.

11. The existing contour of the land at intervals of not more than two-foot intervals, proposed pad elevations, proposed contours, slopes, identification of slopes over 2:1, proposed grading exemptions, and identification of ridgeline.

12. The approximate location of all buildings or structures on the property involved that are to be retained, notations concerning all buildings that are to be removed, and approximate locations of all existing wells.

13. The approximate location and general description of any large or historically significant trees or shrubs and of any protected trees or shrubs and an indication as to the proposed retention or destruction of the trees or shrubs.

14. Location of adjacent leach fields and demonstrate cut slope setbacks per County Deparment of Health Standards.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

219
Item 11.

15. Method, Location, and Sizing of all applicable Storm Water Treatment and Hydromodification.

16. Identify all proposed Street Vacations and/or Public Easement Abandonments.

17. If any streets shown on the Tentative Map are proposed to be private streets, they shall be clearly indicated. Such streets shall conform to the requirements of the City’s Design Standards.

18. The existing and proposed method of providing sewage disposal, potable water, reclaimed water where applicable, and drainage for the property.

19. Existing and proposed electric, gas, and communications facilities, including overhead poles and lines, underground conduit and substructures.

20. A statement regarding existing and proposed zoning.

C. Vesting Tentative Maps.

1. Application. Whenever a provision of the Map Act or this Chapter requires the filing of a Tentative Map, a Vesting Tentative Map may instead be filed, in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. If a subdivider does not seek the vested development rights conferred by the Map Act and this subsection, the filing of a Vesting Tentative Map shall not be a prerequisite to any approval for any proposed subdivision, permit for construction, or work preparatory to construction.

2. Procedures. A Vesting Tentative Map shall be filed on the same form and have the same contents, accompanying data, and reports, and shall be processed in the same manner as set forth in this Chapter for a Tentative Map, except as otherwise provided in this subsection

32.101.01(C). At the time a Vesting Tentative Map is filed, it shall have printed conspicuously on its face the words “Vesting Tentative Map.” If it is known at the time of filing that an additional approval is necessary, the application for such additional approval shall be filed prior to or simultaneously with the Vesting Tentative Map. Fees for review of each of the map requirements listed below, and any other requirements identified by the Director, at the time of application.

3. At the time a Vesting Tentative Map is filed, a subdivider shall provide all information required in connection with the filing of a Tentative Map by this Code, including but not limited to the information required by subsection 32.101.01(B). In addition to any other required information, a subdivider shall provide the following supplemental information:
a. Architectural Design Review, including four-sided elevations showing the architectural features of each proposed building and other features including height, bulk, location and colored materials boards.
b. The final engineering design for grading and improvement plans and specifications for all public and private facilities, including but not limited to on-site and off-site sewer, water, recycled water, drainage, roads, and other onsite and offsite improvements. The subdivider must submit detailed geological, drainage, flood control, stormwater management, soils, traffic, or other reports deemed necessary by the Director to permit a complete review of the design and improvements for the subdivision. c. Precise grading plans showing existing and proposed finished grades, including the plotting of each building on each lot, driveways, fencing, drainage, and the sizing of storm water treatment and attenuation facilities, in sufficient detail to permit approval of such final grading plans.
d. Detailed irrigation and landscape plans, including water use calculations. e. A plan showing proposed phasing of final maps, and phasing for construction. f. Building permit applications, including the plans, and calculations for each building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and structural details. g. Fire sprinkler plans and calculations.
h. Documentation of successful coordination with each resource agency or alternate jurisdiction that has approval authority for any component of the project.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

220
Item 11.

4. Development Rights. The approval or conditional approval of a Vesting Tentative Map shall confer a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the ordinances, policies, and standards in effect on the date the application is deemed complete, and with the conditions of approval imposed and specifically enumerated by the advisory agency.

D. Health Department Certification. A Tentative Map application will not be accepted for processing unless a sanitary sewer is available to each lot or the county Health Department has approved each lot for installation of a sewage disposal system in accordance with the Private Sewage Disposal Systems ordinance.

E. Type of Application. Pursuant to Map Act Section 66426 et seq., a Tentative Subdivision Map application shall be required when the proposed subdivision would result in the creation of five (5) or more lots, condominiums, or stock cooperative dwelling units, and a Tentative Parcel Map application shall be required when the proposed subdivision would result in the creation of four (4) or fewer lots, except as may otherwise be permitted by the Map Act. No application for a subdivision shall be accepted where the land proposed for division is a lot or parcel created illegally, unless the lot or parcel has been approved by the Director of Planning and Building, or on appeal by City Council, in accordance with Division 32.404 of this chapter and the Certificate of Compliance has been filed with the County Recorder. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.201.02. EXCEPTIONS

The provisions of this article shall not apply to the conveyance, transfer, creation or establishment of an easement for sewer, water or gas pipelines and appurtenances or electrical or telephone poles, lines or conduit appurtenances; nor shall it apply to those subdivisions or circumstances described in Sections 66412 and 66428 of the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.202. YIELD

32.202.01. APPLICABILITY

Proposed residential development projects shall not exceed the densities listed for the residential land use designations in the Escondido General Plan and Zoning Code, which indicate MAXIMUM development potential. The ACTUAL yield may be less than the maximum development potential due to development standards, policies, and environmental factors detailed in the General Plan and Zoning Code. Yield calculations resulting in any fractional units shall be rounded down to the next whole number to determine the number of residential units permitted on a parcel of land, except as may be permitted by Sections 32.202.02 and 32.202.03. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.202.02. EXCEPTIONS

Exceptions from density requirements may be permitted for the timely development of lots pursuant to a development agreement, or Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map or Vesting Parcel Map approved prior to the effective date of the General Plan (June 6, 1990), and for the conversion of existing mobile home parks or multiple residential units to resident ownership, and for requests for a density bonus pursuant to the residential land use section of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9- 11-96)

32.202.03. DENSITY CONFORMANCE—TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS

Notwithstanding Section 32.202.01, proposed Tentative Parcel Maps involving constrained lands or limited street dedications on the property, may be considered in conformance with the General Plan, Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

221
Item 11.
if the Director of Planning and Building determines that the proposed project satisfies each of the following criteria:

A. The Tentative Subdivision or Parcel Map proposes lot sizes which conform with the standards of the current zoning designation and such zoning conforms with the current land use category of the General Plan;

B. The proposed lot sizes conform with the minimum size specified in the General Plan Land Use Category in which it is located;

C. The proposed map is infill in nature and the proposed lot sizes are compatible with the size and design of surrounding properties; and

D. The map design conforms with other General Plan goals regarding the preservation of wetlands, riparian areas, steep slopes, and sensitive habitat areas. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11- 96)

32.203 DESIGN CRITERIA

All subdivisions shall meet the design, dedication, easement and construction of off-site and on-site improvement requirements pursuant to the Map Act, this chapter, and the City’s design standards and standard drawings as may be adopted by the City Council, unless a waiver or modification is granted in accordance with Section 32.105.05.

A. Every lot and remainder parcel shall conform to the minimum net lot area and lot dimensions specified in Chapter 33 of this code for the zone in which said lot is located at the time the application is deemed complete.

B. When structures and/or improvements exist and are to remain on a parcel designated as a remainder parcel on the tentative map, the proposed subdivision design shall not result in the creation of any situation not in conformance with the development standards of the zone in which it is located.

C. Every lot and remainder parcel shall front on a dedicated street or a street offered for dedication, unless easement access is permitted by Chapter 33 of this code.

D. Through lots shall not be allowed unless vehicular access rights are relinquished to one of the abutting streets.

E. To the extent feasible, the side lines of all lots shall be at right angles or radial to the street upon which the lots front.

F. To the extent feasible, side and rear lot lines shall be located along the top of man-made slopes.

G. Bicycle ways shall be included in a subdivision when shown on the General Plan or adopted Master Plan in accordance with Section 66475.1 of the Map Act.

H. Parks, trails and recreational facilities shall be included in a subdivision when shown on the General Plan or adopted Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan in accordance with Section 66477 of the Map Act.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

222
Item 11.

I. Grading within the subdivision should not be in excess of that reasonably required to develop the site in harmony with the natural configuration of the land, pursuant to the Excavating and Grading division of the Zoning Code.

J. Intersections of local streets or of local streets with streets shown on the Circulation Element of the Escondido General Plan shall be aligned in accordance with Escondido City standards.

K. In general, the streets shall extend to the boundary of the subdivision to provide the proper access to the adjoining property, and provide for proper connection with the highway system for contiguous and adjacent land and provide adequate turnaround.

L. Intersections of streets shall be at an angle of ninety degrees (90°) or as close to such an angle as practical.

M. Grades of all streets shall be as low as possible, consistent with the advantageous development of the proposed subdivision.

N. Cul-de-sac streets, emergency access roads, and fuel modification zones in areas of high fire hazard, shall be in accordance with Escondido City standards to the satisfaction of Engineering and Fire departments.

O. Panhandle lots are discouraged. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS

32.204.01. APPLICABILITY

All subdividers shall be required to pay the same fees and make the same improvements as required herein, except where the subdivision results in:

A. The division of any parcel or parcels of land into lots or parcels of forty (40) acres or more; or

B. The creation of not more than two (2) lots for financing purposes or to establish vehicle parking areas.

The Director of Planning and Building, City Engineer, Planning Commission, or City Council may grant a waiver or modification of improvement requirements in accordance with Section 32.105.05. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.02. REQUIREMENTS

Before approval of a Final or Parcel Map for a subdivision, the subdivider shall:

A. Grade and improve or agree to grade and improve all land dedicated or to be dedicated for streets or easements, bicycle ways and all private streets and private easements laid out on a Final Map or Parcel Map in such manner and with such improvements as are necessary in accordance with the Escondido City standards;

B. Install or agree to install sewers or sewage disposal systems in accordance with the Private Sewage Disposal Systems ordinance;

C. Provide proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that there exists an adequate potable water supply available to each lot or parcel and that the subdivider will install or agree to install water supply facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer provided that the City Engineer may require Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

223
Item 11.
such other system or size of water supply pipe as recommended by the water facility serving the subdivision;

D. Install or agree to install as required by the City Engineer, fire hydrants and connections, which hydrants and connections shall be of a type approved by the Escondido Fire Chief; and

E. Construct or agree to construct all off-site improvements required by the City Engineer. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.03. EXCEPTIONS TO SURFACING REQUIREMENTS

For offers of dedication for streets rejected pursuant to Section 66477.1 of the Map Act, and for private streets delineated on Parcel Maps where each parcel shown contains a gross area of twenty (20) acres or more, no surfacing shall be required provided that this shall not be construed as relieving the subdivider of the obligation to:

A. Grade such rejected streets to grades and widths required by the Escondido City standards and this chapter.

B. Install all drainage structures and facilities required by the City Engineer which shall conform to the Escondido City standards.

C. Install water supply pipelines, sewer mains, reclaimed water pipelines, fire hydrants and connections as may be required by the City Engineer and Fire Chief, which shall conform to the Escondido City standards. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.04. PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM

When the City Engineer determines that, by reason of the size and shape of the proposed lots, the nature of the terrain to be subdivided, the soil condition of the lots and the development of the area in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision, a public sewer system serving the lots will be required to preserve the public health, or if there is a public sewer main within two hundred (200) feet of the property boundary, the subdivider shall be required to install or agree to install a public sewer system serving said lots as a condition precedent to the approval of any Final or Parcel Map. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.05. UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES

All new and existing utilities distribution facilities, including cable television lines and other communication facilities within the boundaries of any new subdivision or within any property abutting a proposed new subdivision, shall be placed underground pursuant to the requirements of Escondido Municipal Code Section 23-47. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96; Ord. 2005-02 § 1)

32.204.06. FLOOD CONTROL OR DRAINAGE

The subdivider shall install or cause to be installed all flood control and drainage improvements in conformance with the drainage policies of the General Plan, the Drainage Master Plan, the Engineering Division Policy for Drainage Studies, and City design standards. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh.

A, 9-11-96)

32.204.07. STREET TREES
Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

224
Item 11.

The subdivider shall install or cause to be installed street trees as required by Escondido City standards pursuant to the landscape standards of Chapter 33, the Zoning Code. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.08. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS

The subdivider shall install or cause to be installed such traffic control signals or make modifications and upgrades to traffic signal/control equipment as may be required by the City Engineer, Planning Commission or City Council. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.204.09. STORM WATER QUALITY

The subdivider shall install or cause to be installed all required site design, source control and treatment control improvements in conformance with the Stormwater Design Manual, City design standards and Article 2 of Chapter 22 of the Municipal Code, including required maintenance agreement listed therein.

32.205. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS

32.205.01. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS— FINAL MAPS

A. As a condition precedent to the approval of a Final Map, and as permitted by Section 66462 of the Map Act, a subdivider may:

1. Enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with the City for the construction of improvements; or

2. Contract to a special assessment district if authorized by the City Council.

B. The City Engineer is authorized to enter into subdivision improvement agreements on the City’s behalf. The City Engineer’s action pursuant to this section may be appealed to the City Council for conformance with the Map Act and this chapter. The City Council shall periodically review the delegation of authority to the City Engineer

C. The subdivider shall prepare and deposit with the City Engineer detailed plans and specifications of the improvements to be constructed and such plans and specifications shall be made a part of any such subdivision improvement agreement pursuant to this section and of the improvement security.

D. A subdivider who enters into a subdivision improvement agreement pursuant to this section shall be required to furnish security for performance of the improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and in conformance with this chapter and Chapter 5 (beginning with Section 66499) of the Map Act.

E. All agreements and securities pursuant to this section shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney.

(Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.205.02. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS— PARCEL MAPS

A. Prior to approval of a Parcel Map, if improvements are to be located in public easements or rights-of-way, the City Engineer may require that the subdivider enter into an improvement agreement with the City to defer the construction of the improvements until some time in the future Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

225
Item 11.

B. Any improvement agreement executed pursuant to this section may be used to secure future improvements in easements, rights-of-way, or irrevocable offers of dedication; and may be used when the streets serving adjacent properties, or the area in general, or both, are below City standards to a degree that public action, such as assessment district proceedings, would be required in the future in order to improve such streets to City standards.

C. The City Engineer is authorized to enter into improvement agreements made pursuant to this section on the City’s behalf. The City Engineer’s action pursuant to this section may be appealed to the City Council for conformance with the Map Act and this chapter. The City Council shall periodically review the delegation of authority to the City Engineer

C. The subdivider shall prepare and deposit with the City Engineer detailed plans and specifications of the improvements to be constructed and such plans and specifications shall be made a part of any such improvement agreement pursuant to this section and of the improvement security.

D. A subdivider who enters into an improvement agreement pursuant to this section shall be required to furnish security for performance of the improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and in conformance with this chapter and Chapter 5 (beginning with Section 66499) of the Map Act.

E. All agreements and securities pursuant to this section shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney.

(Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.205.03. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY

Any improvement agreement, contract or act for which security is required or authorized by the Map Act, this chapter, or any other local ordinances or regulations, shall be secured in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 5 (beginning with Section 66499) of the Map Act generally as listed below.

The amount of security may be modified by the City Engineer as the City Engineer deems appropriate consistent with the Map Act.

A. Security Requirements. When public or private improvements are required to be constructed by the City, an agreement to improve and improvement security, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be posted by the applicant with the City for said improvements. This security shall be posted prior to filing of the Final Map or Parcel Map in the following amounts:

1. Faithful Performance Bond in an amount not less than 100% of the approved engineer’s estimate of the cost of public improvements.

2. Labor and Materials Bond in an amount not less than 50% of the approved engineer’s estimate of the cost of public improvements.

3. Guarantee and Warranty Bond in an amount not less than 10% of the approved engineer’s estimate of the cost of public improvements.

4. Grading Bond in an amount not less than 100% of the approved engineer’s estimate of the cost of grading, drainage, landscaping, water quality and private improvements. 10% of the Grading Bond bond shall be in the form of cash not exceeding $50,000.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

226
Item 11.

5. Monumentation Bond in an amount not less than 100% of the approved engineer’s estimate of the cost of setting monuments.

6. Additional improvement security may be required for the faithful performance for any changes or alterations in the work to the extent that those changes or alterations exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the improvement.

B. Special Assessment Proceedings. In the event that the required subdivision improvements are financed and installed pursuant to special assessment proceedings, the subdivider may apply to City Council for a reduction in the amount of the improvement security.

C. Release of Security. The improvement security required by this chapter may be released by City Engineer upon approval and acceptance of the secured improvements. A partial release of security for partial performance may be authorized by the City Engineer. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9- 11-96)

32.206. SUPPLEMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

32.206.01. REQUIREMENTS

A. The subdivider may be required to construct or install supplemental improvements in excess of those required to serve the property in the subdivision, as a condition prior to the approval of a Final or Parcel Map, and thereafter to dedicate those improvements to the public pursuant to Section 66485 of the Map Act.

B. The City may also require a subdivision to install supplemental improvements for the benefit of property outside the subdivision, pursuant to an adopted local drainage or sanitary sewer plan or map, or the establishment of an area of benefit for bridges or major thoroughfares. The City may impose a reasonable charge on property within the area benefited and may provide for the collection of the charge in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and Section 66487 of the Map Act.

C. Prior to the filing of any Final or Parcel Map, fees may be required for defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing or installing any or all of the following improvements pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 4 (beginning with Section 66483) of the Map Act.

1. Planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from local or neighborhood drainage areas, and of sanitary sewer facilities for local sanitary sewer areas.

2. Bridges or major thoroughfares. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.206.02. REIMBURSEMENT OR REPAYMENT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

When supplemental improvements are required, the City shall enter into reimbursement or repayment agreements with the subdivider who shall be reimbursed or repaid for that portion of the cost of improvements installed or constructed for the benefit of property outside of the subdivision in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and Article 6 of Chapter 4 (beginning with Section 66485) of the Map Act, and adopted City policies.

A. Funding Procedures for Supplement Improvements. A charge, and area of benefit or local benefit district shall be established in order to provide a fund for reimbursement or repayment of the subdivider who constructs or installs supplemental improvements; however, no such charge, area of benefit or local benefit district shall be established unless and until a public hearing is held by City Council and it finds that:

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

227
Item 11.

1. The fee or charge is reasonably related to the cost of the supplemental improvements; and

2. The area of benefit or local benefit district substantially comprises the actual ultimate beneficiaries of the improvements.

B. Notice Requirements. In addition to the notice required by the Map Act and the Notices and Appeals division of the Zoning Code, written notice of the public hearing, regarding the establishment of a charge, area of benefit or local benefit district, shall be given to the subdivider and to those who own property within the proposed area of benefit as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll, and to the potential users of the supplemental improvements insofar as they can be ascertained at the time. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.207. MONUMENTS

32.207.01. SETTING MONUMENTS

Monuments shall be set as required by Escondido City standards and Article 9 of Chapter 4 of the Map Act. Monuments shall be shown on the Final or Parcel Map. The setting of exterior boundary monuments shall not be deferred unless the City Engineer determines that such monuments might be disturbed by the construction of improvements. An engineer’s certificate as required by Section 66441 of the Map Act shall be filed prior to approval of the Final or Parcel Map. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.207.02. COORDINATE SYSTEM

Monuments for a final map, parcel map, adjustment plat, record of survey, or other survey maps, shall be set and tied to the California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS-83), Zone 6, based on the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD-83) geodetic datum. When vertical positioning is required, it shall be tied to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Other geodetic and vertical coordinate systems may be used if prior approval of the City Engineer is obtained. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.207.03. CONTROL MONUMENTS

The City of Escondido has established a permanent network of geodetic control monuments on an approximate 1/2-mile grid for proper coordinate tie-in of such map boundaries. All data pertaining to these control monuments has been filed in accordance with the Land Surveyors Act and these records have been indexed and are readily available to the general public. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.207.04. WAIVER

In the event that existing control monuments are not accessible, the surveyor or engineer shall submit a written request to waive this requirement. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.208. DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS

32.208.01. DEDICATION

The subdivider shall make all applicable dedications, or irrevocable offers of dedication, as required by the Map Act, this chapter, and Escondido City Standards.

A. The subdivider shall offer to dedicate the right-of-way for streets within, and along the boundary of, the subdivision in accordance with Escondido City standards.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

228
Item 11.

B. If all, or a portion, of any street abuts an unincorporated area, a one-foot control lot, over which access rights are relinquished, shall be dedicated.

C. Where it is necessary to extend a street beyond the boundaries of a subdivision to provide adequate circulation for residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall cause the required easements to be dedicated to the City and shall improve said easements in accordance with Escondido City standards.

D. Where a drainage facility or flood control facility is necessary for the use of lot owners or for the protection of lots, adequate rights-of-way for such drainage facilities or flood control facilities shall be offered for dedication to the City or to such other public entities as the City Council designates and shall be shown on the map.

E. Where necessary to extend streets, sewer systems, drainage or flood control facilities beyond the boundaries of the subdivision, the necessary easements and rights-of-way shall be offered for dedication and shown on the map, or demonstrate that off-site easements can be obtained.

F. Drainage and flood control facilities within and outside the subdivision shall be designed and dedicated so as to carry both tributary and original source runoff within the subdivision.

G. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 66477 of the Map Act, the subdivider shall offer to dedicate land for park and recreational purposes, pay fees in lieu thereof, or do a combination of both in conformance with the standards of the Escondido General Plan, the Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan, and Chapter 6, Article 18C of the Escondido Municipal Code.

H. The subdivider shall offer to dedicate, in accordance with Escondido City standards, the necessary rights-of-way for bicycle ways when such ways as shown on the Bicycle Facilities Master Plan, pass through or abut a subdivision with two hundred (200) or more parcels.

I. Prior to approval of any Final Map or Parcel Map, an offer of dedication for public use shall be made for all parcels within a subdivision which are intended for public use; except, that no offer of dedication need be made for those parcels intended for the exclusive use of the lot owners within the subdivision.

J. In the event that an offer of dedication for an open-space easement is to be made over any portion of the subdivision, the Final Map or Parcel Map shall contain an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City, signed and acknowledged by those parties having any record title interest in the subdivided land. Maintenance responsibilities shall remain with the land owner, or other designated party. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.208.02. PRIVATE EASEMENTS

Whenever a private easement for access is created within the boundaries of a subdivision, it shall be perpetual and shall be conveyed to subsequent purchasers of each parcel affected by the grant. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.208.03. OFF-SITE EASEMENTS

The subdivider shall secure all needed easements for off-site improvements or address the status of the easements in the application. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.208.04.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

229
Item 11.
[Reserved]

32.209. FINDINGS

32.209.01. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

A. Prior to the approval or conditional approval of a Tentative Subdivision or Tentative Parcel Map, findings shall be made that the map meets all of the requirements or conditions imposed by the Map Act and this chapter. No map shall be approved if it is not consistent with the required findings, the Escondido General Plan and this chapter.

B. In addition to the findings required by Section 32.209.01.A, a Tentative Subdivision or Tentative Parcel Map shall not be approved unless the following requirements have been satisfied or conditions are attached to the approval which insure that such requirements will be satisfied before a Final or Parcel Map is approved:

1. All permits and approvals applicable to the proposed Tentative Map pursuant to Chapter 33 of this code have been obtained.

2. All applicable requirements of the Map Act and any ordinance of the City of Escondido regulating or otherwise relating to the conversion of existing buildings into condominiums or stock cooperatives have been satisfied.

3. The proposed Tentative Map shall be in conformity with the zone in which it is located. To the extent that the property, which is the subject of the proposed Tentative Map, is an existing legal nonconforming multi-family residential use, this requirement shall not apply, in accordance with Chapter 33 of this code.

4. All requirements of CEQA have been met. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.210. EXPIRATION OF TENTATIVE MAPS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME

32.210.01. EXPIRATION

A Tentative Map which has been approved or conditionally approved shall expire 36 months from the effective date of approval, unless additional time is granted pursuant to the Map Act, or pursuant to a development agreement. If the tentative map is subject to a development agreement, the term of the tentative map may be extended as provided in the development agreement, but not beyond the expiration date of the development agreement.

32.210.02. EXTENSION OF TIME.

A. Extensions of time for an approved or conditionally approved tentative map will be considered upon submittal of a written request, justification statement, and all required fees to the Planning Division prior to and within four months of the expiration date of the tentative map.

B. The time at which an approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires may be extended by the legislative body or advisory agency for a period or periods not exceeding a total of six years. A public hearing and/or public notice may be required if the Director of Community Development determines that it is warranted.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

230
Item 11.

C. If an extension of time is approved, an applicant must comply with the provisions of Chapter 3, Article 2 of the Map Act and all provisions and findings of this ordinance applicable to the initial filing of tentative maps pursuant to Article 2 of this chapter. In order to assure this compliance, the conditions of initial approval of the tentative map may be modified or deleted and new conditions may be added when the extension of time is approved.

32.211. MAP MODIFICATIONS

Modifications to a tentative map and/or conditions of approval, which, in the opinion of the Director, are not in substantial conformance, shall comply with the provisions for processing a tentative map as contained in this Subdivision Code. Modifications may be referred to the Planning Commission and/or City Council when the Director determines that said modification affects a related discretionary action. If the modification is approved, the applicant shall submit a revised Certified Map for approval. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

231
Item 11.

Chapter 32 Subdivisions, Article 3 Final and Parcel Maps

32.301. GENERAL MAP REQUIREMENTS

The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of a Final Map or Parcel Map shall conform to the provisions of the Map Act and this chapter and to all applicable Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Map. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.301.01. PARCEL MAP ALTERNATIVE

A Parcel Map, prepared in accordance with the Map Act and this chapter may be filed in lieu of:

A. A Final Map, when an approved Tentative Subdivision Map has been filed for a subdivision which meets the requirements of Section 66426 of the Map Act.

B. A Tentative Subdivision Map and Final Map, for construction of a condominium project on a single parcel. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.301.02. WAIVER OF PARCEL MAPS

A. Pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 2 of the Map Act, the requirement for a Parcel Map may be waived if a finding is made that the proposed subdivision complies with the requirements as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, environmental protection, and other requirements of this chapter and the Map Act, including the following types of subdivisions:

1. Residential purchase of mobilehome park according to Division 32.401.

2. A subdivision, wherein the average gross area of all resulting lots or parcels equals forty (40) acres or more provided that no lot or parcel contains a gross area of less than twenty (20) acres.

B. The applicant for a subdivision, pursuant to subsection (A) shall submit an application for a Tentative Parcel Map and a written request for waiver of the Parcel Map with sufficient information in the opinion of the Director of Planning and Building, to make the findings required by this section.

The processing of any such application shall be subject to the same fees, time requirements and appeal procedures as are provided in this chapter for Tentative Parcel Maps.

C. Where waiver of the Parcel Map is granted by the Director of Planning and Building, the Director shall cause to be filed for record with the County Recorder a Certificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of Compliance pursuant to Division 32.404 of this chapter. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.301.03. CONTENTS OF FINAL MAP OR PARCEL MAP

In addition to the information required by the Map Act, every Final Map or Parcel Map shall contain or show all of the following:

A. A legal description of the land subdivided by references to recorded deeds, recorded maps and official United States surveys. Reference to tracts, recorded deeds and recorded maps shall be spelled out, worded identically with original records and show the book and page of records or map numbers;

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

232
Item 11.

B. The Basis of Bearings shall be the California Coordinate System (NAD 83) as established by use of existing monuments, Global Positioning System (GPS) surveys, or by use of astronomic observation;

C. Those ties to such control monuments and the coordinates published by the City for these control monuments. The boundary of the map shall be tied into the California Coordinate System (NAD 83) in at least two locations, preferably on opposite ends of a single boundary line having found monuments or as agreed to by the City Engineer. These ties shall include both grid and ground distances and include the combined scale factor at one of the tie points on the subdivision boundary.

D. All easements to which land is, or will be, subject, including all open space easements and mitigation requirements;

E. Existing monuments that are found and a description of them;

F. The size of all parcels expressed in square feet for parcels less than one acre and expressed in acres for parcels more than one acre in size;

G. All areas which are subject to inundation as determined by the City Engineer, including flood- way limits and the 100-year flood-plain;

H. A solid line separating from public streets all private ways, easements and other rights-of-way not to be accepted as public streets, and clearly designate their nature and the manner in which the right is reserved or granted;

I. The number of the subdivision on every sheet;

J. Figures which are mathematically correct; and

K. No contingencies. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.302. CERTIFICATES

32.302.01. FINAL MAPS

A. At Time of Filing. At the time of filing with the City Engineer, every Final Map shall bear, in addition to those certificates, statements, acknowledgements, and endorsements required by the Map Act, all of the following completed certificates and endorsements:

1. A certificate by the City Treasurer, County Tax Collector, and County Public Works Director to the effect that there are no unpaid special assessments or bonds, which may be paid in full shown by the records in their offices, against the subdivision or any part thereof;

2. A certificate by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors that the provisions of the Map Act have been complied with regarding deposits for taxes on the property within the subdivision; and

3. A certificate of a qualified title company guaranteeing that the parties who executed the Owner’s Certificate, required by Section 66436 of the Map Act, are all the parties having any recorded title interest in the land subdivided. Said certificate shall also set forth the names of the parties owning the interests as defined in Section 66436 of said act together with a description of said interests and the reasons the parties did not execute the owner’s certificate. The clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall notify the title company making such certificate of the date the Final Map Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

233
Item 11.
will be transmitted to the County Recorder. Such notification shall be made at least 48 hours before said date. The title company shall, on said date, present to the County Recorder a letter stating that on said date the names of the parties and the other facts set forth in the title company’s certificate were the same as shown by the certificate.

4. In lieu of the title company certificate required above, there may be filed with the City Engineer a subdivision guarantee from a qualified title insurance company, in an amount approved by the City Engineer, which guarantees that the parties named are the only parties having any record title interest in the land subdivided. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall notify the title company furnishing the subdivision guarantee of the date the Final Map will be transmitted to the County Recorder. Such notification shall be made at least 48 hours before said date. The title company, shall, on said date, present to the County Recorder, pursuant to the requirements of Section 66465 of the Map Act, a letter stating that at the time of filing of the Final Map or Parcel Map in the office of the County Recorder, the parties consenting to such filing are all of the parties having a record title interest in the real property being subdivided whose signatures are required by the Map Act, as shown by the records in the office of the County Recorder.

B. Additional Certificate on Final Maps. In addition to the certificates and other material required by the Map Act and by this chapter, every Final Map shall bear a certificate by the City Engineer that:

1. The map conforms with all provisions of this chapter;

2. The map conforms to the approved Tentative Map; and

3. Provides for acceptance, acceptance subject to improvement or rejection of a dedication or an offer to dedicate by the City Engineer.

C. After Approval by the City Engineer. All of the following certificates and endorsements shall be completed after approval by the City Engineer:

1. The Clerk of the County Board of Supervisors; and

2. The County Recorder.

D. The certificates and endorsements required by subsections (A) and (B) may be contained in a separate instrument in accordance with the provisions of the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9- 11-96)

32.302.02. PARCEL MAPS

A. Additional Certificate on Parcel Maps. In addition to the certificates and other material required by the Map Act and this chapter, every Parcel Map shall bear a certificate by the City Engineer that:

1. The map conforms with all provisions of this chapter;

2. The map conforms to the approved Tentative Map; and

3. Provides for acceptance, acceptance subject to improvement, or rejection of a dedication or an offer to dedicate by the City Engineer.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

234
Item 11.

B. The certificates and endorsements required by this section may be contained in a separate instrument as provided in the Map Act.

C. Dedications or offers to dedicate may be made either by certificate on the Parcel Map, or by separate document in accordance with the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.303. REVIEW PROCESS—FINAL MAPS AND PARCEL MAPS

32.303.01. GENERAL PROVISIONS

A Final Map or Parcel Map shall not be approved unless:

A. A Tentative Map has been approved or conditionally approved by the Director of Planning and Building, Planning Commission, or City Council, as required by this chapter; and

B. The Final Map or Parcel Map meets all requirements of this chapter, and all requirements of the Map Act. The Final Map and all necessary documents shall be submitted to the City Engineer far enough in advance of the expiration date of the tentative map approval to allow sufficient time for processing. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.303.02. PRIOR TO FILING

Prior to filing a Final Map or Parcel Map with the City Engineer, each of the following requirements shall be met:

A. The Final Map or Parcel Map must conform to the approved or conditionally approved tentative map;

B. All required fees shall be paid, including plan check and inspection fees;

C. All bonds guaranteeing required improvements or performance shall be posted and shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney;

D. All improvement agreements shall be executed, and approved as to form by the City Attorney;

E. A Certified Map shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning and Building; and

F. A digital graphics file containing the boundary, street centerline, right-of-way, and lot/parcel line data necessary to facilitate transferring of the file into the City mapping system shall be submitted in an acceptable format as determined by the City Engineer. In the event the surveyor or engineer submitting a map does not have the capability to fulfill this requirement, an appeal may be filed with the City Engineer to waive the requirement. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.303.03. FILING A FINAL MAP

A. City Engineer. After the Final Map has satisfied all requirements of this chapter and all conditions of the tentative map, the Final Map shall be filed with the City Engineer for approval or disapproval as outlined in this chapter and in accordance with Chapter 3, Article 4, of the Map Act.

1. Upon the City Engineer’s receipt of a Final Map:

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

235
Item 11.
i. The City Engineer shall notify the City Council at its next regular meeting after the City Engineer receives the Final Map that the Final Map is being reviewed for final approval; and
ii. T he Clerk of the City Council shall provide notice of any pending approval or disapproval by the City Engineer, which notice shall be attached and posted with the City Council’s regular agenda and shall be mailed to interested parties who request notice.

2. Upon receipt of a Final Map, the City Engineer shall examine the Final Map to determine:
a. whether the subdivision as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the approved tentative map, and any approved alterations thereof; b. whether all provisions of law and of this chapter applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map have been complied with; and
c. whether the Final Map is technically correct.

3. W ithin 10 days following the meeting of the City Council that was preceded by the notice described in subsection 32.303.03(A)(1)(i) of this section, the City Engineer shall approve a Final Map if it conforms to (i) all requirements of this chapter applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map, and (ii) all requirements of the Map Act. The City Engineer shall disapprove a Final Map for failure to meet or perform any such requirements, supported by a finding identifying the requirements or conditions that have not been met or performed.

4. In connection with the City Engineer’s approval or disapproval of a Final Map, the City Engineer may accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject dedications and offers of dedications that are made by a statement on the Final Map.

5. Any appeal of the City Engineer’s approval or disapproval of a Final Map shall be made to the City Council.

6. The City Council shall periodically review the delegation of authority to the City Engineer made pursuant to this section.

B. Signatures. After approval, the City Engineer shall sign the map. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9- 11-96)

32.303.04. FILING A PARCEL MAP

A Parcel Map approved by the Director of Planning and Building as complying with the Certified Map shall be filed with the City Engineer for approval prior to the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map, after the requirements of Section 32.303.02 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The date the map shall be deemed filed with the City Engineer is the date on which the City Engineer receives a complete parcel map package. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

1. The City Engineer is authorized to make all findings necessary for approval, conditional approval, or disapproval of a Parcel Map.

2. In connection with the City Engineer’s approval, conditional approval, or disapproval of a Parcel Map, the City Engineer may accept or reject dedications and offers of dedication that are made by a statement on the Parcel Map. The City Engineer shall disapprove a Parcel Map for failure to meet or perform any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the Map Act or this chapter.

3. Any appeal of the City Engineer’s approval, conditional approval, or disapproval of a Parcel Map shall be made to the City Council.

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

236
Item 11.

32.303.05. RECORDATION

After the approved Final Map or Parcel Map has been signed by the City Engineer, the map and any improvement agreement required by this chapter shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder by the City Clerk. After recordation, the subdivider shall furnish the City Engineer with a reproducible copy of the recorded map and any improvement agreement required by this chapter. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

237
Item 11.

Chapter 32 Subdivisions, Article 4 Other Processes

32.401. WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION MAP PROCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENT

PURCHASE OF A MOBILEHOME PARK

32.401.01. APPLICABILITY

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the requirement for the filing of a Tentative Subdivision Map, Final Map, or Parcel Map for the resident purchase of a mobilehome park, may be waived by the Director of Planning and Building according to the requirements of this division. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.401.02. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

An applicant for a conversion to resident ownership pursuant to this division shall submit an application and fee for a Tentative Parcel Map to the Planning Division pursuant to this chapter, together with a written request that the applicable Tentative Subdivision Map, Final Map, or Parcel Map requirement be waived. The application shall contain sufficient information to enable the Director of Planning and Building to make the findings required by this division, or the Director may impose such conditions as deemed necessary to make the findings required by this division. Waiver of the Tentative Subdivision and Final Map, or Parcel Map, does not waive any other discretionary review required by this chapter or Chapter 33, the Zoning Code. Refer to City Council Resolution 96- 159, Mobilehome Park Conversion Guidelines for Change of Use Application. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh.

A, 9-11-96)

32.401.03. REVIEW PROCESS

A. The Director of Planning and Building shall review the request for a waiver of required maps and may approve the waiver if all of the findings can be made or conditions necessary to make the findings can be imposed. When a waiver is approved, the Tentative Parcel map shall be processed pursuant to Article 2 of this chapter, or in conjunction with any associated discretionary applications.

B. Where waiver of the Tentative Subdivision and Final Map, or Parcel Map is granted, the Director of Planning and Building shall cause to be filed for record with the County Recorder a Certificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of Compliance. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.401.04. FINDINGS

No waiver shall be issued for any map for a resident purchase of a mobilehome park unless the following findings have been made by the Director of Planning and Building:

A. The applicant has submitted evidence that requirements for notification of all existing and prospective residents have been met as required by Section 66427.1 of the Map Act;

B. The required number of residents in the mobilehome park as specified in the bylaws or other organizational documents, have voted in favor of such purchase. If the bylaws or other organizational documents do not specify the number of votes required for such a purchase, a majority vote of the residents shall be required; and

C. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with Sections 66427.4, 66428(b), and 66428.1 of the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.402. ADJUSTMENT PLATS

32.402.01. APPLICABILITY
Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

238
Item 11.

An Adjustment Plat may be submitted pursuant to the provisions of this division to adjust the boundaries between two or more adjacent parcels. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter to the contrary, the procedure set forth in this division shall govern the processing of and requirements for Adjustment Plats. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.402.02. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Applications for the review of an Adjustment Plat shall be submitted to the Planning Division on a City application form, together with all fees, plats, certificates, and any other information required by the Director of Planning and Building to determine whether or not the required findings can be made, and that the proposed adjustment is consistent with Escondido zoning and building ordinances. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.402.03. REVIEW PROCESS

A. Referral. The Director of Planning and Building may refer copies of such plats to other city departments as well as public agencies for review and comment.

B. Approval. The Director of Planning and Building shall review the application, any comments received from other city departments or public agencies and the provisions of this chapter and then shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the plat. The applicant shall be notified in writing of the Director’s action.

C. Certification. If the Director of Planning and Building determines that the Adjustment Plat meets the requirements of this chapter, the Director shall certify on the Adjustment Plat that it has been approved pursuant to this chapter and file said plat in the Planning Division. A revised Adjustment Plat shall be submitted for certification when the Director of Planning and Building finds that the number or nature of the changes necessary for approval are such that they cannot be shown clearly or simply on the original Adjustment Plat.

D. Recordation. The Adjustment Plat approved and certified by the Director of Planning and Building shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder in conjunction with grant deeds and certificates of compliance, and the appropriate legal descriptions. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.402.04. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

Approval of an adjustment plat shall be based on the determination that the exchange of property does not:

A. Create any new lots;

B. Include any lots or parcels created illegally;

C. Impair any existing access or create a need for new access to any adjacent lots or parcels;

D. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving adjacent lots or parcels; nor

E. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for substantial new improvements. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.402.05. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ADJUSTMENT PLATS

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

239
Item 11.

Whenever applicable the Director of Planning and Building may prescribe the following requirements as Conditions of Approval of an Adjustment Plat;

A. Relocation of lot lines to provide lots that meet the requirements of the Health Department, comply with all applicable zoning and General Plan regulations, conform to standards of lot design specified in Division 32.202 of this chapter, and do not result in irregular/unbuildable lots.

B. The provisions of safe and adequate access to each lot or parcel within the Adjustment Plat.

C. The addition of a distinctive boundary line, clearly labeled, which delineates the limits of any area determined by the City Engineer to be subject to flooding or inundation. The plat shall contain an appropriate note stating that the area is subject to flooding or inundation. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh.

A, 9-11-96)

32.402.06. TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS

The failure to file a revised Adjustment Plat for certification within six (6) months from the date of conditional approval of the original plat shall result in a termination of all proceedings unless prior to expiration of the period, an application for extension is made and approved by the Director of Planning and Building. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.403. MERGERS AND REVERSIONS TO ACREAGE

32.403.01. MERGERS

The merger of two or more contiguous parcels or units of land shall be governed by Article 1.5 of Chapter 3 (beginning with Section 66451.10) of the Map Act. Those contiguous parcels or units of land which do not conform to the requirements of Section 66451.11 of the Map Act shall be deemed merged. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.403.02. RESUBDIVISION

Subdivided land may be merged and resubdivided in accordance with the provisions of Section 66499.20-1/2 of the Map Act, this chapter and any other applicable ordinances of the City of Escondido. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.403.03. REVERSIONS TO ACREAGE

Subdivided property may be reverted to acreage pursuant to the provisions of this division and Article 1 of Chapter 6 (beginning with Section 66499.11) of the Map Act.

A. Submittal Requirements. A petition for Reversion to Acreage shall be submitted to the Planning Division and shall contain, in addition to all of the information required by the Map Act, all of the following:

1. Evidence of the consent of all the owners of any interest in the property;

2. Evidence that none of the improvements required to be made have been made within two (2) years from the date the Final or Parcel Map was filed of record, or within the time allowed by agreement for completion of the improvement, whichever is later;

3. Evidence that no lots shown on the Final or Parcel Map have been sold within five (5) years from the date such Final or Parcel Map was filed of record;

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

240
Item 11.

4. Fee for processing in an amount to be determined by resolution of City Council; and

5. A Final or Parcel Map which delineates dedications which will not be vacated and dedications which are a condition to reversion.

B. Review Process. The Director of Planning and Building shall forward a recommendation on the application to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of the Map Act. The City Council shall make the findings required by Section 66499.16 of the Map Act prior to approving or conditionally approving a Reversion to Acreage.

C. Conditions of Reversion. When necessary to accomplish any of the purposes of this chapter, the City Council shall require as conditions of the reversion, that:

1. The owners dedicate or offer to dedicate streets or easements; and

2. All or a portion of previously paid subdivision or other fees, improvement security and any other deposits be retained.

D. Return of Fees, Deposits and Release of Securities. Upon filing of a Final or Parcel Map for a reversion to acreage with the County Recorder, all dedications and offers of dedication not shown on the map shall be of no further force or effect. In addition, all fees and deposits shall be returned to the subdivider and all improvement securities shall be released except those retained pursuant to Section 32.403.03.C of this chapter. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.404. CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE

32.404.01. APPLICABILITY

The Director of Planning and Building may, upon written request, issue certificates of compliance in accordance with the provisions of the Map Act, after determining that the parcel of real property was created in compliance with the provisions of the Map Act and of local ordinances enacted pursuant thereto. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.404.02. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

An application for a Certificate of Compliance shall be submitted to the Planning Division on a City application form together with all grant deeds, chain of title, legal descriptions, title reports, fees, and any other information required by the Director of Planning and Building to determine if the parcel was created in conformance with the state law and local ordinances. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.404.03. REVIEW PROCESS

A. Approval. The Director shall make a determination on whether to issue Certificates of Compliance or Conditional Certificates of Compliance, pursuant to Section 66499.35 of the Map Act.

1. Whenever the Director of Planning and Building has knowledge that real property has been divided in violation of the provisions of the Map Act, of this chapter or of any other City ordinance, the Director of Planning and Building shall mail a notice of intention to record a notice of violation to the current owner of record of the property, in accordance with the provisions of the Map Act.

B. Recordation. The Certificate of Compliance, or the Conditional Certificate of Compliance, shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.405. CORRECTION AND AMENDMENT OF MAPS
Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

241
Item 11.

32.405.01. APPLICABILITY

After a Final Map or Parcel Map is filed in the office of the County Recorder, it may be amended by a certificate of correction or an amending map, pursuant to Article 7 of Chapter 3 (beginning with Section 66469) of the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.405.02. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

A written request to amend or correct a recorded Final Map or Parcel Map shall be submitted to the Engineering Department. In addition to the submittal requirements of the Map Act, the application shall also include each of the following:

A. The amending map or certificate of correction prepared and signed by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor;

B. A copy of the original recorded map with the proposed changes shown and highlighted; and

C. Any other information or materials as may be required by the City Engineer. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.405.03. REVIEW PROCESS

The City Engineer, and the City Council if applicable, shall review map corrections or amendments pursuant to the provisions of the Map Act. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

32.405.04. RECORDATION

The amending map or certificate of correction approved and certified by the City Engineer, and if applicable, approved by the City Council, shall be recorded in the office of the county Recorder by the applicant, and a copy of the recorded document returned to the City Engineer. (Ord. 96-26, § 1, Exh. A, 9-11-96)

Ordinace No.2022-02
Exhibit A

242
Item 11.

STAFF REPORT

January 12, 2022
File Number 0610-55

SUBJECT

COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON, CHANGE TO CITY OF ESCONDIDO

SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPRESENTATIVE

DEPARTMENT
City Attorney

RECOMMENDATION
None.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with a change to the City of Escondido’s (“City”) representative to the SANDAG Board of Directors (the “Board”). Whether the absence of a representative on the Board could have an indirect and/or long-term financial impact on the City is not known.

PREVIOUS ACTION
On De cember 15, 2021, Councilmember Michael Morasco requested that a future agenda item be calendared to discuss options for a change of the City’s representative on the Board.

BACKGROUND
A. SANDAG.

The San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) is a statutorily -created regional organization composed of the region’s local governments (“Member Agencies”). The San Diego Regional Transportation Consolidation Act, found in California Public Utilitie s Code sections 132350 et seq , expresses a legislative intent to provide a coordinated and comprehensive regional approach to transportation planning to improve the “efficiency and effectiveness of implementing needed transportation infrastructure and services and provide for a focus on meeting the mobility needs of the region.” Pursuant to its bylaws, the primary purpose of the organization is to “engage in regional cooperative planning, programming and where authorized, implementation thereof, and to ass ist the Member Agencies.”

243
Item 12.

The Board is comprised of mayors, councilmembers, and county supervisors from each of the County of San Diego’s cities and the County Board of Supervisors. Pursuant to state law, the City of San Diego and the County of San Diego each have a primary and secondary representative on the Board making a total of 21 Board members.

All powers of SANDAG are exercised by the Board. The Board itself is comprised of duly selected official representatives or in their absence, the duly se lected alternates for each Member Agency. The Board appoints an Executive Director who serves as the chief executive officer of SANDAG much like the City’s city manager is responsible to the City Council for the administration of the City’s business and implementation of its policies.

Pursuant to state law, PUC section 132351.1(d) controls the selection for, and filling the vacancy of, Board seats. Section 132351.1(d) provides in relevant part that the governing body for each of the 18 cities in the County and the County Board of Supervisors selects one primary representative, except that the City of San Diego and County of San Diego have two representatives and requires the representative for the City of San Diego to be the mayor and president of the city council. As to all other cities, the Board representative shall be a mayor, councilperson (or supervisor) selected by the governing body of the agency who “shall serve until recalled by the governing body of the city or county.” If a vacancy is created it must be “filled in the same manner as originally selected.” Member Agencies are also required to select one alternate to serve on the Board when the primary representative is not available. The alternate is required to be a mayor, councilperson or supervisor of the Member Agency governing body.

B. Selection of City Representation on City and Regional Boards.

The City of Escondido is a general law city incorporated under the laws of the State of California. The powers of a general law city include only t hose powers expressly conferred upon it by the Legislature, together with such powers as are “necessarily incident to those expressly granted or essential to the declared object and purposes of the municipal corporation.” The powers of such a city are str ictly construed so that “any fair, reasonable doubt concerning the exercise of a power is resolved against the corporation.” G.L. Mezzetta v. City of American Canyon (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1087, 1092.

Escondido Municipal Code section 2 -26 (Duty to appoin t and set terms for board and commission members) provides as follows:

Unless otherwise provided by state law, the mayor shall appoint and set the terms for all members of all boards and commissions. Notwithstanding any other provisions of state law or any other laws of the city, the members of such boards and commissions shall serve at the pleasure of the city council and shall at all times be residents of the geographic area within the city’s general plan.

244
Item 12.

As to boards and commissions created by the city council, and unless provided for otherwise in the Code, EMC section 2 -30 (Appointment and terms of office) also references and provides for a mayoral appointment process as follows:

Unless otherwise provided by this code, appointments of members of all boards and commissions created by the city council and their terms of office shall be governed by the following provisions:
(a) The members of all boards and commissions shall be appointed by the mayor from among the residents of the geographic area within the city’s general plan. The members of all boards and commissions shall serve at the pleasure of the council, and may be removed from office at any time, without cause;
(b) The terms of office for members of all boards and commissions for the City of Escondido shall be for a four (4) year period commencing with the ac tual date of appointment and ending on March 31st of the fourth year thereafter; and (c) Any vacancy which occurs prior to the expiration of a term shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of such term.

Pursuant to EMC sections 2-26 and 2-30, for all boards and commissions created by the city council or to which it is a member, the mayor has the appointment power of the City representatives to those entities and that appointment power is subject to ratification by a majority of the city council. These general and specific references to mayoral appointments are consistent with state law. Government Code section 40605 provides in relevant part:

In general law cities where the office of mayor is an elective office … the mayor, with the approval of the city council, shall make all appointments to boards, commissions, and committees unless otherwise specifically provided by statute.

The above analysis is consistent with opinions issued by the California Attorney General’s Office. The California Attorney General provides legal opinions to designated state and local public officials and government agencies on issues raised in the course of their duties. These opinions are advisory but are treated as authoritative by public offices and persuasive authority by courts. Thorning v. Hollister School District (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1598, 1604 (interpretations of state statutes are entitled to great respect); Napa Valley Educators’ Association v. Napa Valley Unified School District (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 243, 251 (opinions are not binding but entitled to great weight).

In 1998, the Attorney General issued Opinion No. 97-1103 in response to questions from California State Senator William Craven. 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 75. Senator Craven asked whethe r the “appointment power of an elected mayor of a general law city extend[s] to appointments (a) to regional boards, commissions, and committees, (b) that a city ordinance requires to be made by the city council, and (c) to 245
Item 12.

subcommittees of the city counci l?” Senator Cravens also asked for an opinion as to whether a “city council has the authority to direct the mayor to appoint a particular person in any of these circumstances?”
The Attorney General’s Office, after reviewing applicable state statutes, concluded that unless otherwise specifically provided by statute, the appointment power of an elected mayor of a general law city extends to appointments of regional boards, commissions, and committees subject to the approval of the city council. The opinion notes that the appointment power of the mayor extends to “ all appointments to boards, commissions, and committees…” pursuant to Government Code section 40605. (Emphasis in original.)
The Attorney General also opined that unless a state statute specifically provides, the appointment power of an elected mayor extends to all appointments to subcommittees of the city council and further that the city council “does not have the authority to direct the mayor to appoint a particular person to a board, commission, or committee.”
The Attorney General found that the appointment power of the elected mayor extends even to appointments that a city ordinance requires be made by the city council. The opinion reads:

We believe, instead, that the Legislature intended to create a system of checks and balances by placing the appointment authority in the hands of the elected mayor, while giving the city council the right to reject mayoral appointments. This balancing system would be circumvented if a city council could, at any time, abrogate the mayor’s appointment authority through the enactment of an ordinance. In order for the Legislature’s vesting of appointment authority in the elected mayor to be given appropriate significance, we believe that section 40605 must be construed as unaffected by local ordinances. (81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 75.)
C. Selection and Removal of City Representative for SANDAG Board of Directors.

On December 16, 2020, Mayor Paul McNamara was unanimously selected by the City Council as the City’s representative to the Board. Councilmember Michael Morasco was selected as the First Alternate and Councilmember Consuelo Martinez was selected as the Second Alternate. These appointments expire on December 14, 2022.

As noted above, the representative for each board or commission, including a regional board such as SANDAG, serves at the pleasure of the City Council. (EMC sections 2 -26, 2-30(a)). Further, PUC section 132351.1(d) appears to recognize the possibility that a governing body of a Member Agency may recall its representative. However, once recalled, the Member Agency must fill that vacancy by the same selection process. As a result, the City Council may remove the Board representative via a majority vote and the 246
Item 12.

vacancy created must be filled using the existing nomination and council vote ratification process provided for in state law and the EMC.

CONCLUSION:

Pursuant to the Escondido Municipal Code, the mayor nominates and a majority of the City Council ratifies a nominee for all City and regional boards and commissions. Likewise, a majority of the City Council may remove a representative from the board or commission position. To effectuate such a decision, a councilmember may make a motion, and once seconded, a vote must be taken. If a majority of the City Council vote to remove the duly selected representative, the City Clerk must notify the SANDAG Clerk of Board when the City’s representative changes.

Pursuant to state law, only the mayor has the power to nominate individuals for city and regional boards and commissions. If action is taken as to the current Board representative, in order for the City to have a representative on the Board, it is recommended that the mayor nominate a member of the City Council to serve in that capacity and the City Council will need to ratify that nomination by a majority vote. In the absence of a nomination and ratification, the City of Escondido will have no representative on the Board.

247
Item 12.

KEY-

CONSENT CALENDAR CURRENT BUSINESS

PUBLIC HEARING WORKSHOP
01/26/2022
CONSENT CALENDAR - (J. PROCOPIO) - RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 2022-01 (ECLIPSE AND MOUNTAIN HOUSE) - Request the City Council approve declaring its intent to form CFD 2022-01, the Eclipse and Mountain House Project, to fund public facilities and setting a public hearing date of March 2, 2022. It is further recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2022-08, declaring its intent to incur bond indebtedness and approve Agreements with CalWest regarding acquisition and funding of public facilities. As a part of this request, CalWest agrees to annex into the City Services CFD No 2020-1.

CONSENT CALENDAR - (A. FINESTONE) - EXTENSION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOAN AGREEMENT AND COVENANTS FOR DAYBREAK GROVE & SUNRISE PLACE APARTMENTS - Request the City Council approve an extenstion of affordable housing loan and covenants for Daybreak Grove and Sunrise Place Apartments.

CURRENT BUSINESS - (J. AXELROD) - ESCONDIDO CREEK TRAIL EXPANSION AND RENOVATION PROJECT UPDATE - Request the City Council receive and file an update on the progress of the Escondido Creek Trail Expansion and Renovation Project funded through an $8.5 million Prop 68 grant.

CURRENT BUSINESS - (J. AXELROD) - REIDY CREEK GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT AND CONCESSION CONTRACTS - Request the City Council approve authorizing staff to move forward with issuing a Request for Proposals for the management of the Reidy Creek Golf Course and Concessions.

CURRENT BUSINESS - (C. MCKINNEY) - AUTHORIZING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE WATER FILTRATION JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO AND THE VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, AND EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN RAW WATER COMVEYANCE FACILITIES - Request the City Council approve to authorize the Director of Utilities to execute a Second Amendment to the Water Filtration Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, a Quitclaim Deed, and a Bill of Sale. The JPA amendment will update and consolidate various agreements governing the operation and maintenance of the Escondido-Vista Water Filtration Plant. The other documents pertain to the transfer of ownership of several raw water conveyance pipelines and the quitclaim of associated easements between Lake Wohlford and Water Filtration Plant. The parties to these agreements are the City of Escondido and Vista Irrigation District (VID).

WORKSHOP - (C. HOLMES) - CALPERS PENSION FUNDING WORKSHOP - Request the City Council receive and file information on the City’s California Public Employees Retirement System pension obligations.
2/2/2022
CURRENT BUSINESS - (C. HOLMES) - FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 SECOND QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - Request the City Council receive and file the second quarter financial report and approve a budget adjustment to amend the fiscal year 2021/22 operating budget.