Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Escondido City Council
August 24, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 24, 2022
Body
Escondido City Council
Pages
75
Original file
43.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net. That file is the official record.

150
Item8.

Page 20 of 20 ends

B. Install or agree to install sewers or sewage disposal systems in accordance with the Private Sewage Disposal Systems ordinance;
C. Provide proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that there exists an adequate potable water supply available to each lot or parcel and that the sub -divider will install or agree to install water supply facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer provided that the City Engineer may require such other system or size of water supply pipe as recommended by the water facility serving the subdivision; D. Install or agree to install as required by the City Engineer, fire hydrants and connections, which hydrants and connections shall be of a type approved by the Escondido Fire Chief; and
E. Construct or agree to construct all off -site improvements required by the City Engineer.

F. Subdivisions created under the provisions of section 33 -116 of the Escondido Zoning Code shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. Easement(s) may be required for future public facilities, utilities, and/or access.

Attachment 1

Page 20 of 20 ends

151
Item8.

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-19

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS

TO THE ESCONDIDO MUNICIPAL AND ZONING CODES
FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SENATE BILL 9.

WHEREAS, the City of Escondido Planning and Engineering Divisions and City Attorney’s Office have reviewed the Government Code sections created by the adoption of Senate Bill 9 (“ SB 9 ”), and developed objective development standards to efficiently implement the requirements in the City of Escondido; and
WHEREAS, to create the local provisions , Planning Division staff identified the need to amend Articles 1 (General Provisions and Definitions ), 6 (Residential Zones ), and 61 (Administration and Enforcement) of the Escondido Zoning Code , and Sections 23-119 (Public dedication of rights -of-way required), 23 -120 (Public improvements required), 23 -47 (Undergrounding required), and 32.204.02 (requirements) of the Escondido Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Escond ido, on July 12 , 202 2, held a public hearing to consider the Zoning Code Amendments and unanimously recommended approval of the items as provided in Exhibit “B”; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“ CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 of California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.), the City is the Lead Agency for the Project, as the public agency with the principal responsibility for approving the proposed Amendments; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2022, the City Council of the City of Escondido did hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law. At said hearing, the City Council received and considered the reports and recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, and gave all persons full opportunity to 152
Item8.

be heard and to present evidence and testimony respecting said matter. Evidence was submitted to and considered by the City Council, including, without limitation:
a. Written information, and other material, submitted as part of the Amendments; b. Oral testimony from City staff, interested parties, and the public; c. The staff report, dated August 24, 2022 , with its attachments as well as City staff’s recommendation on the Amendments, which is incorporated herein as though fully set forth herein; and d. Additional information submitted during the public hearing.

The City Council of the City of Escondido, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true.

SECTION 2. That the proposed Zoning Code Amendments are exempt from further review pursuant to the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n), in that the proposed amendments are associated with adoption of local SB 9 requirements.

SECTION 3. That the Project satisfies the requirements of state Planning and Zoning Law.

SECTION 4. That the proposed amendments to the Escondido Municipal and Zoning Codes are consistent with the Escondido General Plan and applicable Elements were reviewed as part of the amendment drafting process to ensure consistency.

SECTION 5. That, after consideration of all evidence presented, and studies and investigations made by the City Council and on its behalf, the City Council makes the substantive Findings of Fact and determinations attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” relating to the information that has been considered.

SECTION 6. That, considering the Findings of Fact and applica ble law, the City Council hereby approves said amendments, attached as Exhibit “B” and hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

SECTION 7. SEPARABILITY. If any section, subsection , sentence, clause, phrase or por tion of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by any court of competent jurisdiction, 153
Item8.

such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.

SECTION 8. That as of the effective date of this ordinance, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 9. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to certify to the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same or a summary to be published one time within 15 days of its passage in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the County and circulated in the City of Escondido. 154
Item8.

Ordinance No. 2022-19
Exhibit A

Page 1 of 1 ends

FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED / FINDINGS OF FACT
PL22-0363

Zoning Code Amendment Determinations:

1. The p ublic health, safety, and welfare will not be adversely affected by the proposed change in that the amendment under consideration is directly linked to the recent State legislation (SB 9), and adopts local objective requirements and procedures for efficiently processing two family dwelling developments and urban lot splits.

2. The proposed modifications are for all parcels zoned estate residential (R-E) and single- family residential (R-1) on the City of Escondido Zoning Map, as well as parcels in specific plans intended primarily for single-family residential development. The approval of these requirements are consistent with State law and allows for implementation of local objective development standards.

3. The uses that would be permitted by the proposed Zoning Code Amendment will not be detrimental to surrounding properties because on January 1, 2022, the provisions for SB 9 became active across the State and already appl y to every single-family residential parcel in the City of Escondido. Adoption of local requirements allows the City to establish objective development standards to ensure compatibility with existing residential neighborhoods.

4. The proposed change is consistent with the adopted General Plan as the City of Escondido must continue to provide more opportunities for housing to meet the Reginal Housing Needs Allocation of 9,607 units that have been assigned to Escondido. In addition, State law supersedes our local limitations regarding single-family residential zoning districts, and adopting local objective standards allows the ability to maintain neighborhood compatibility to the extent possible.

5. By reference, the proposed changes, pursuant to SB 9, will apply to parcels in s pecific plans designated primarily for single-family residential use. 155
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 1 of 20 ends
Page 1 of 20 ends

THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS SHALL BE

ADDED TO THE ESCONDIDO ZONING
CODE:

Sec. 33-115. Two-family dwellings in single-family residential zones and specific plans
(a) Purpose. The purpose of section 33-115 is to appropriately regulate qualifying Senate Bill 9 two-family dwelling unit developments within single-family residential zones in accordance with California Government Code section 65852.21.

(b) For the purposes of this section and section 33 -116 only, the term two-family dwelling shall mean two attached or detached units on single -family zoned properties, as described in subsection ( d), and on properties in specific plans intended for single-family residential use.

(c) Permit required. Two family dwellings shall require processing of a major Plot Plan application as described in division 8 of article 61 of this chapter.

(1) The director of development services or their designee (Director) shall review complete applications for compliance with the requirements of this section and the underlying development standards in the zoning district or specific plan in which it is located, and any other applicable objective development standards stated in the Municipal Code. Notwithstanding language in any specific plan to the contrary, provisions of this section shall supersede where any conflict exists. The Director shall ministerially approve complete applications found to be in compliance with these standards.

(2) The Director may deny a complete application if it fails to comply with the requirements of this section, the underlying development standards in the zoning district or specific plan in which it is located , and any other applicable objective development standards stated in the Municipal Code. In addition to the foregoing, the Director may deny an application if such denial is based upon a preponderance of evidence and the written finding of the building official that the proposed two-family dwelling project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in Government Code section 65589.5, subdivision (d)(2), upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards.
156
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 2 of 20 ends
Page 2 of 20 ends

(d) Appeals of the Director’s decision shall be governed by section 33-1303.

(1) If the development of a two-family dwelling project requires another entitlement pursuant to the Escondido Zoning Code, the two -family dwelling project shall not be approved until that entitlement process is completed and approved. If the entitlement is not approved , the two -family dwelling project cannot be approved unless it is redesigned to eliminate the need for the denied entitlement.

(e) Location.

(1) Except as specified below, two -family dwellings shall be permitted in estate residential (R-E) and single-family residential (R-1) zones, and on properties in specific plans intended primarily for single-family residential use.

(2) Two-family dwellings shall not be permitted in the following locations:

(A) On p roperties that allow as the primary use multi-family residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, or mixed uses, regardless of the allowance of single-family residential uses.

(B) On properties described in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Government Code section 65913.4.

(C) Within a historic district or upon property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic resource or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.

(D) On parcels requiring demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:

i. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.

ii. Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.

iii. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

(E) On parcels which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with section 7060) of 157
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 3 of 20 ends
Page 3 of 20 ends

Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.

(F) On parcels with legal nonconforming uses or structures unless development of the two-family dwelling brings the property into conformance.

(f) Objective Development Standards: The development standards se t forth below shall apply to all two-family dwellings. Any development standard not explicitly identified below shall be subject to the underlying zoning designation or specific plan, and all applicable provisions of this code, unless superseded by Government Code sections 65852.21, 66411.7, and 66452.6.

(1) Unit Size:

(A) The minimum unit size of any unit created as part of a two-family dwelling shall be 400 square feet.

(B) Except as described below, n o new unit constructed as part of a two- family dwelling may exceed 800 square feet.

i. New units may be up to 1,200 square feet if they meet all of the following requirements:

a. The parcel on which the two-family dwelling is located is in the R-E or R-1 zone and has a lot size of at least one and a half (1 ½) times the minimum size otherwise permitted in the zone.

b. No accessory dwelling unit or junior ADU exist on the parcel.

c. A deed restriction is recorded prohibiting the construction of an ADU or junior ADU on the parcel.

d. Existing and new dwelling units shall each have two
covered parking spaces.

e. An attached or detached garage or covered parking
space(s) associated with the 1,200 square foot unit does not exceed 450 square feet.

f. Existing and new dwelling units shall meet the minimum setbacks in the underlying zone.

158
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 4 of 20 ends
Page 4 of 20 ends

g. Addition of the new unit does not result in the parcel being out of compliance with the maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage for the underlying zone.

ii. New units may be up to 1,500 square feet if they meet all of the following requirements:

a. The parcel on which the two-family dwelling is located is in the R-E zone and has a lot size of one and one half (1 ½) times the minimum size otherwise permitted in the zone, or is in the R-1 zone and has a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet.

b. The unit satisfies all requirements identified in subsections b through g of section 33-115(e)(1)(B)i.

iii. New units may be up to 2,000 square feet if they meet all of the following requirements:

a. The parcel on which the two-family dwelling is located is in the R-E or R-1 zone and has a lot size of at least one acre.

b. The unit satisfies all requirements identified in subsections b through g of section 33-115(e)(1)(B)i.

(C) Any future subdivision of a parcel with a two -family dwelling project shall not cause the parcel to be out of compliance with the provisions of this subsection.

(2) Setbacks and building separation:

(A) Minimum side and rear yard setbacks for a two-family dwelling shall be no less than four feet.

(B) Section 33 -104(c), projections into setbacks, shall not apply to any projects utilizing sections 33-115 or 33-116.

(C) For two family dwellings constructed on properties which have frontage on streets which have not been dedicated to their ultimate width, setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way.

(D) Setback requirements noted above shall not apply to a legally existing detached accessory structure that is utilized as one of the two units associated wit h the two -family dwelling or for a new structure constructed in the same location as a legally existing detached accessory structure.
159
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 5 of 20 ends
Page 5 of 20 ends

(E) Detached dwelling units and associated covered parking shall be a minimum of 10 feet from each other unless all structures are single-story and not more than 16 feet in height , in which case the minimum separation shall be five feet.

(F) Notwithstanding subsection ( E) above, all dwellings with less than 10 feet of separation shall meet the fire resistive construction requirements contained in the California Residential and Fire codes.

(3) Maximum Height/Stories:

(A) If located within the rear or side yard setback of the underlying zoning district, the two-family dwelling shall be limited to 16 feet and one-story.

(B) If compliant with the setbacks for the underlying zoning district, the two- family dwelling shall comply with the height limitations of the underlying zoning district.

(4) Parking Requirements:

(A) At least one off-street parking space shall be provided for each new unit constructed under the provisions of this section. Said parking spaces shall be covered, and shall not be in tandem with parking spaces for any other unit on the property.

(B) The required parking shall be located onsite with the two-family dwelling the parking is associated with.

(C) Parking spaces shall be designed pursuant to section 33-769. Compact spaces are not permitted.

(D) The foregoing parking standards shall not be required in either of the following circumstances:

i. The two -family dwelling is located within one -half mile walking distance of either a high -quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code. The applicant shall be responsible for demonstrating applicability of this section; or

ii. There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the two - family dwelling.

160
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 6 of 20 ends
Page 6 of 20 ends

(5) Access and easements

(A) Vehicular access from the public right of way shall meet the following requirements:

i. Driveways that provide access to two homes shall have a minimum paved width of 20 feet.

ii. Driveways that provide access to three homes, or that provide access to parking facilities with nine or more parking spaces, shall have a minimum width of 24 feet, unless the parking facility is served by 2 one -way driveways, in which case each driveway shall be at least 12 feet wide.

iii. All driveways shall have a height clearance of at least 13 feet 6 inches, and shall be paved with cement, asphaltic concrete, or other all-weather construction material(s) and to the City Design Standards for Driveway Structural Design.

iv. Access improvements shall be provided in compliance with the City’s adopted standard drawings.

(B) Access to lots shall be in conformance with Article 39 of the Escondido Zoning Code. Dead end access shall be no longer than 150 -feet in length unless a Fire Department approved turn-around is provided. Fire Department access shall be a minimum of 20 feet in unobstructed width.

(C) Emergency access and easements for the provision of public facilities, utilities, and/or access shall be provided in compliance with applicable sections of the municipal code.

(6) The primary entrance for any new dwelling unit constructed as part of a two - family dwelling shall not be oriented to the side or rear property line unless the structure meets the side or rear setback established by the underlying zoning district.

(7) Each unit in a two-family dwelling shall be placed on a permanent foundation and permanently connected to the public sewer system or an onsite wastewater treatment system approved by the County of San Diego Health Department.

(8) Each unit in a two-family dwelling shall include sufficient pe rmanent provision for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitations, including but not limited to washer/dryer hookups and full kitchen facilities.

161
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 7 of 20 ends
Page 7 of 20 ends

(9) Both units in a two-family dwelling shall share the same water and sewer utility connections and meter , and shall be subject to connection fee s or capacity charges, or both.

(g) Additional Requirements:

(1) Construction of a two-family dwelling project shall not require the demolition of more than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of an existing dwelling unless the site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

(2) Any unit created pursuant to this section shall, if rented, be rented for a term longer than 30 days.

(3) A deed restriction prepared by the City shall be re corded against the subject property prior to issuance of any building permit(s) for a two-family dwelling.

The deed restriction shall run with the land and shall stipulate compliance with the applicable provisions of this section.

(4) New dwelling units constructed as part of a two-family dwelling shall meet the requirements of the California Building , Residential, and Fire codes, as such codes have been adopted and amended by Chapter s 6 and 11 of the Escondido Municipal Code.

(5) Both uni ts in a two-family dwelling project shall utilize the same colors and materials. This requirement applies whether both units are constructed at the same time or if one unit is added to a property that is currently developed with an existing unit.

(6) Solar panels shall be required on newly constructed units within a two-family dwelling project in compliance with the California Energy Code.

(7) Accessory Dwelling Units:

(A) For the purposes of this subsection, Unit refers to either a primary dwelling unit, an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), or a junior ADU.

(B) Inclusive of the two -family dwelling requirements described in this section, any existing parcel may be permitted to construct up to four total units.

(C) Any parcel created pursuant to section 33-116 shall be permitted to have no more than two total units.

(D) ADUs and Junior ADUs shall be governed by the provisions of Article

70. 162
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 8 of 20 ends
Page 8 of 20 ends

Sec. 33-116. Urban lot split
(a) Purpose. The purpose of section 33-116 is to appropriately regulate qualifying Senate Bill 9 urban lot split developments within single-family residential zones in accordance with California Government Code section 66411.7.

(b) For the purposes of this section, two-family dwelling shall have the same meaning as that identified in section 33-115.

(c) Urban lot splits, as defined in section 33-8, shall be approved ministerially without discretionary review.

(d) Urban lot splits are not permitted on the following parcels:

(1) Those described in section 33-115(d)(2);

(2) Parcels that were created by a prior urban lot split;

(3) Parcels adjacent to those which the owner or someone acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided through an urban lot split process.

(4) Parcels where subdivision would result in either of the new parcels being out of compliance with the maximu m unit sizes identified in subsection 33 - 115(e)(1)(C).

(5) Parcels containing more than two units, as that term is described in subsection 33-115(f)(7)(A).

(e) All provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and Escondido Municipal Code shall apply unless expressly modified in this section.

(1) No dedication of right -of-way or construction of offsite improvements shall be required as a condition of parcel map approval.

(2) If the urban lot split is proposed on a public street that has not been dedicated to its ultimate width, public access and utility easements shall be recorded as a condition of parcel map approval.
(f) Development Standards. Parcels shall be subject to all development standards of the zone in which the property is located, except as modified below:
(1) Lot size:
(A) Each newly created lot shall be at least 40% of the lot area of the parcel being divided.
163
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 9 of 20 ends
Page 9 of 20 ends

(B) Each newly created parcel shall be no smaller than 1,200 square feet. (2) Setbacks, unit size, and parking requirements shall be the same as those in section 33-115(e).
(g) A parcel created by an urban lot split shall be permitted to have a total of two units.

This can be achieved through either a two-family dwelling, a single-family dwelling with an ADU, or a single-family dwelling with a junior ADU. (h) Parcels created by an urban lot split shall not be required, as a condition of ministerial approval, to correct nonconforming zoning conditions. (i) An application for an urban lot split shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures, provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. (j) Access to lots shall be in conformance with Article 39 of the Escondido Zoning Code. Dead end access shall be no longer than 150 -feet in length unless a Fire Department approved turn-around is provided. Fire Department access shall be a minimum of 20 feet in unobstructed width.
(k) Each dwelling unit and parcel shall have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right of way. Accessibility shall be in conformance with the Building Code and Am ericans with Disability Act , and shall not preclude construction of future public improvements
(l) Easements for the provision of public facilities, utilities, access, and/or emergency access shall be provided as a condition of approval of an urban lot split. (m) Unless specifically exempted pursuant to Government Code section s 66411.7(g)(2) and (3), a n applicant for an urban lot split shall sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split.
(n) Units on parcels created subject to this section shall, if rented, be rented for a term longer than 30 days.
(o) Applications for urban lot splits shall be processed in the same manner as those for tentative parcel maps, and shall be subject to the applicable requirements contained in Chapter 32 of the Escondido Municipal Code. (p) Notes shall be included on the parcel map which reference compliance with sections 33-115 and 33 -116 of the Escondido Zoning Code, and any other provisions of said code related to urban lot splits.
164
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 10 of 20 ends
Page 10 of 20 ends

(q) Fees for urban lot split applications shall be the same as those assessed for other tentative parcel map and parcel map applications.
(r) Denial of permit:
(1) The City may deny a request for an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the request would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of section 65589.5 the California Government Code, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. (s) Appeals:
(1) Appeals of the director’s decision shall be governed by section 33-1303.

1. THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION SHALL BE ADDED TO SEC. 33-8. DEFINITIONS OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE (IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER):

Urban lot split means the subdivision of any lot in a single -family residential zone or parcels designated for primarily single-family development in a specific plan into two lots.

2. SEC. 33-90. PURPOSE OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 33-90. Purpose.
(a) Residential zones are established to provide for residential districts of various population densities so that the various types of residential developments may be separated from each other as necessary to assure compatibility of uses within family living areas, including the necessary appurtenant and accessory facilities associated with such areas.
(b) The following classes of residential use zones are established:
(1) The agriculture residential (R-A) zone is established to provide an agricultural setting in which agricultural pursuits can be encouraged and supported within the city. The R-A zone is designed to include single-family detached dwellings and to protect agricultural uses from encroachment by urban uses until residential, commercial or industrial uses in such areas become necessary or desired.
(2) The estate residential (R -E) zone is established to provide a rural setting for family life in single -family detached dwellings. Provisions are made for the maintenance of limited agricultural pursuits as well as those uses necessary and incidental to single-family living.
165
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 11 of 20 ends
Page 11 of 20 ends

(3) The single-family residential (R -1) zone is established to provide a suburban setting suitable for family life in single-family, detached dwellings. (4) The mobilehome residential (R-T) zone is established to provide a mobilehome park setting for family life in single-family detached mobilehomes. No land shall be classified into this zone where such classification would create an R-T zone area of less than four hundred thousand (400,000) square feet. (5) The light multiple residential (R-2) zone is established to provide a multifamily setting for family life in low-height, low density dwelling units in close proximity to single-family residential neighborhoods.
(6) The medium multiple residential (R -3) zone is established to provide a multifamily setting for family life in low-height, medium density dwelling units in close proximity to other multifamily neighborhoods.
(7) The high multiple residential (R-4) zone is established to provide a multifamily setting for family life in mid-height, high density dwelling units in close proximity to other multifamily neighborhoods and near the city’s center. (8) The very high multiple residential (R -5) zone is established to provide a multifamily setting for family life in higher -height, very high density dwelling units in close proximity to other multifamily neighborhoods and near the city’s center.
(c) Subsection 33 -90(a) notwithstanding, this section also serves to implement provisions of sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 of the Government Code.

3. TABLE 33-94 OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO APPEAR AS FOLLOWS:

Table 33-94
Permitted/Conditional Uses & Structures R-
A
R-
E
R-
1 R-
T
R-
2 R-
3 R-4 R-
5 Residential and Lodging
Single-family dwellings detached P P P P P1 P1 P1
Mobilehome on parcel alone, pursuant to
section 33-111 P P P P
Two-family dwelling units and urban lot
splits
P2 P2
166
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 12 of 20 ends
Page 12 of 20 ends

Permitted/Conditional Uses & Structures R-
A
R-
E
R-
1 R-
T
R-
2 R-
3 R-4 R-
5 Two-family, three-family, and multiple-
family dwellings P P1 P1 P1
Notes:
1 No vacant or underdeveloped lot or parcel of land in any R-3, R-4, and R-5 zone shall be improved or developed at a density below seventy (70) percent of the maximum permitted density. Exceptions to the minimum density requirement may be granted in writing as part of the plan approval required by section 33-106 provided the development will not preclude the city from meeting its housing needs as described in the housing element of the Escondido general plan. Minimum density requirements sh all not apply to property owners seeking to enhance or enlarge existing dwelling units or construct other accessory structures on a site.
2 Pursuant to sections 33-115 and 33-116.

4. SEC. 33-95. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS (Note: Tables 33-95 and 33- 95a are not shown below, however they shall not be deleted from the Escondido Zoning Code. Table 33-95 shall follow subsection (a)(1) and Table 33-95a shall follow section (b)(4)):

Sec. 33-95. Permitted accessory uses and structures.
(a) Accessory uses and structures are permitted in residential zones, provided they are incidental to, and do not substantially alter the character of the permitted principal use or structure. Such permitted accessory uses and structures include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 33-95.
(1) When provided by these regulations, it shall be the responsibility of the director to determine if a proposed accessory use is necessarily and customarily associated with, and is appropriate, incidental, and subordinate to, the principal use, based on the director’s evaluation of the resemblance of the proposed accessory use to those uses specifically identified as accessory to the principal uses and the relationship between the proposed accessory use and the principal use.
(b) The permitted types and quantities of animals allowed in residential zones is listed in Table 33-95a. Other household pets are allowed pursuant to section 33-1116 of Article 57 of this chapter.
(1) At no time shall the keeping of such animals and pets constitute a nuisance or other detriment to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community.

(2) All animal keeping is subject to the animal control and humane treatment standards in Chapter 4 of the Municipal Code (Animal Control) and other regulations found in County and State codes, including, but not limited to, State Health and Safety Code.
167
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 13 of 20 ends
Page 13 of 20 ends

(3) No more than the quantities of animals specifically listed in Table 33 -95(a) or section 33-1116 shall be kept on any premises, except that offspring may be kept onsite for up to four (4) months from birth.

(4) The number of animals allowed on properties that have been divided pursuant to section 33-116 shall be one half of that otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district.

5. SEC. 33-97. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 33-97. Property development standards.
(a) In addition to the property development standards set forth in this chapter, the development standards set forth in this article shall apply to land and structures in residential zones.

(b) Properties developed pursuant to sections 33-115 or 33-116 shall be subject to the development standards contained in those sections. For any develo pment standards not addressed in those sections, the standards contained elsewhere in this chapter shall apply.

6. TABLE 33-98a OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO APPEAR AS FOLLOWS:

Table 33-98a

Zoning
Suffix
Minimum
Lot Area
(square
feet)
Average
Lot Width
(feet)
Minimum Street Lot
Frontage
Population
Density
R-T2 4,500* 55* 35 feet on a line parallel to the
centerline of the street or on a
cul-de-sac improved to city
standards1.

Frontage on a street end that
does not have a cul-de-sac
improved to city standards
shall not be counted in
Not more than
one single-
family
dwelling may
be placed on
a lot or parcel
of land in this
zone.3
R-1-6 6,000 60
R-1-7 7,000 65
R-1-8 8,000 70
R-1-9 9,000 75
R-1-10 10,000 80
R-1-12 12,000 85
R-1-15 15,000 90
168
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 14 of 20 ends
Page 14 of 20 ends

Zoning
Suffix
Minimum
Lot Area
(square
feet)
Average
Lot Width
(feet)
Minimum Street Lot
Frontage
Population
Density
R-1-18 18,000 95 meeting this requirement
except for panhandle lots.

Panhandle lots pursuant to
Article 56.

*Mobilehome parks pursuant
to Article 45 allow different lot
requirements. Title 25
provisions apply where
applicable.

R-1-20 20,000 100
R-1-25 25,000 110
R-E-20 20,000 100
20 feet or be connected to a
public street by a permanent
access easement1.

Panhandle lots pursuant to
Article 56.

R-E-25 25,000 110
R-E-30 30,000 125
R-E-40 40,000
150
R-E-50 50,000
R-E-60 60,000
R-E-70 70,000
R-E-80 80,000
R-E-90 90,000
R-E-
100 100,000
R-E-
110 110,000
R-E-
130 130,000
R-E-
150 150,000
R-E-
170 170,000
R-E-
190 190,000
R-E-
210 210,000
169
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 15 of 20 ends
Page 15 of 20 ends

Zoning
Suffix
Minimum
Lot Area
(square
feet)
Average
Lot Width
(feet)
Minimum Street Lot
Frontage
Population
Density
R-A-5 217,800
150
60 feet or be connected to a
public street by a permanent
access easement.1

Panhandle lots pursuant to
Article 56.

R-A-10 435,600

Notes:

1. Exception: Access to lots or parcels may be provided by private road easement conforming to the following standards:
(a) The minimum easement widths shall be 20 to 24 feet as determined by the city engineer and fire marshal; subject to the Escondido Design Standards and Standard Drawings; (b) Pavement section widths, grades and design shall be approved by the city engineer; (c) A cul -de-sac or turnaround shall be provided at the terminus to the satisfaction of the planning, engineering and fire departments.

2. Except for land that was being used for mobile homes prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this article, no land shall be classified into this zone where such classification would create an R-T zone area of less than 400,000 square feet.

3. Properties developed pursuant to section 33 -115 and/or 33-116 shall be allowed one two-family dwelling project/Urban Lot Split.

7. SEC. 33 -106. PLAN APPROVAL REQUIRED OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 33-106. Plan approval required.
(a) Building plan review and building permits are required for the construction or modification of single -family detached dwellings, mobilehomes, and some accessory structures in residential and R -T zones. Application shall be made to the building division for plan review, which is subject to planning division confirmation of zoning compliance . Two-family dwellings and urban lot splits in single-family residential zones shall be processed pursuant to section 33-115 and 33-116 of this article, respectively.
(b) An appropriate development application for the construction or modification of more than one dwellings on any lot in R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 zones, multiple-family dwellings, some accessory structures, and nonresidential development in all residential zones is required pursuant to Article 61 of this chapter. 170
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 16 of 20 ends
Page 16 of 20 ends

8. SEC. 33-107. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, GENERALL OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 33-107. Building requirements, generally.

Table 33 -107 lists building requirements in r esidential zones (excluding mobilehome parks approved pursuant to Article 45).

Table 33-107
Building
Requirements
R-A R-E R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 R-T*
Building height (feet),
except as otherwise
provided in this chapter
35 35 35 351 351 75 75 35
Maximum building
stories 21 31 41 41
Minimum distance
between residence and
accessory buildings
(feet)
105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105
Dwelling unit minimum
floor area (square feet)2 850 1,0006 8506 500 400 400 400 700 Maximum percent lot
coverage by primary
and accessory
structures
20% 30% 40% 50% none none none 60%
Maximum floor area
ratio (FAR)3 0.3 0.44 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 none
Minimum square feet
allowed for residential
and parking regardless
of the FAR
1,500 1,500 1,500 2,500 3,500 4,500 5,000 700

Notes:

1. Buildings or structures in excess of one (1) story and located adjacent to single-family zoned land, shall provide a setback equal to the abutting setback required by the single-family zone standards, plus five (5) additional feet for each story over two (2) on the property line(s) abutting the single - family zone(s) as noted in sections 33 -100 and 33 -101. Additionally, building features such as windows, doors, balconies, etc., bulk and scale shall not adversely affect the adjacent single-family property.

2. Area is exclusive of porches, garages, carports, entries, terraces, patios or basements.

3. FAR is the numerical value obtained by dividing the total gross floor area of all buildings on the site by the total area of the lot or premises.
171
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 17 of 20 ends
Page 17 of 20 ends

4. Except that the maximum FAR for the RE -20 zone shall be 0.5; and for the RE -170 and RE-210 zones the maximum FAR shall be 0.3.

5. Pursuant to section 33-103(c), if the residence (or main building) and detached accessory building are both one (1) story in height, then the minimum separation requirement may be reduced to five (5) feet, unless a greater distance is required by local bui lding and fire code requirements for fire separation.

6. Dwelling unit minimum floor area does not apply to units created subject to section 33 -115. * Requirements apply unless superseded by Title 25.

9. SEC. 33-1314. DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF THE ESCONDIDO ZONING CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 33-1314. Definition and purpose.
(a) Plot plan means a zoning instrument used primarily to review the location and site development of certain permitted land uses. The plot plan review process is required when any of the following are proposed in a multi -family, commercial, or industrial zone:
(1) A new building, structure, or addition;
(2) A new permitted use of land or existing structure that may require additional off-street parking;
(3) A modification of an existing development affecting the building area, parking (when a reduction in parking spaces is proposed), outdoor uses, or on -site circulation. Changes to parking areas that do not result in a reduction in parking spaces are exempt from plo t plan review, but require design review, as provided in section 33-1355(b)(2);
(4) As may otherwise be required by this chapter.

Plot plan review is not required for residential development created by a planned development or residential subdivision of single-family lots. (b) Minor plot plan may include, but shall not be limited to, a change in use with no additional floor area, minor building additions, outdoor storage as an accessory use in the industrial zones, or other site plan changes affecting site circulation and parking, as determined by the director.
(c) Major plot plan may include, but shall not be limited to, new construction, reconstruction and additions of facilities permitted in the underlying zone, or other projects that exceed thresholds for a minor plot plan, as determined by the director. 172
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 18 of 20 ends
Page 18 of 20 ends

All two -family dwelling projects proposed pursuant to section 33 -115 shall be subject to the approval of a major Plot Plan.

10. SEC. 23-119. PUBLIC DEDICATION OF RIGHTS -OF-WAY REQUIRED OF THE ESCONDIDO MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 23-119. Public dedication of rights-of-way required. (a) Subject to the “individualized determination” of section 23-121, any applicant who constructs any new building or dwelling in the city shall grant necessary public dedication or have provided a grant of easement or other appropriate conveyance, as approved by the city attorney. Accessory structures with a valuation less than twenty-three thousand eight hundred twenty -eight dollars ($23,82 8.00), as determined by building permit valuation, and accessory structures to single-family residences shall be exempt from this section. Rights-of-way shall also be provided for any improvements to existing facilities including rights -of-way for storm drains or other required public facilities. All rights-of-way shall be accompanied by a title examination report and be free of all liens and encumbrances. (b) The public dedications required by subsection (a) of this section shall also apply to any person who enlarges or expands any building in the city if the cost of such work exceeds the sum of twenty-three thousand eight hundred twenty-eight dollars ($23,828.00) as determined by building permit valuation. By resolution of city council, said amount may be increased annually consistent with the International Code Council valuation schedule for the appropriate construction type. (c) The required public dedications shall be granted prior to issuance of the building permit for the subject property.
(d) In determining the building permit valuation, the building official shall include the cumulative building permit valuation of multiple building permit applications within a twelve (12) month period to determine whether the development is exempt from this section.
(e) Projects developed under the provisions of sections 33-115 and/or 33-116 of the Escondido Zoning Code shall be exempt from the provisions of this section.

Easement(s) may be required for future public facilities, utilities, and/or access.

11. SEC. 23-120. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED OF THE ESCONDIDO MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 23-120. Public improvements required.
(a) Subject to the “individualized determination” of section 23-121, any applicant who constructs any building or dwelling in the city shall construct all necessary public 173
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 19 of 20 ends
Page 19 of 20 ends

improvements in accordance with city specifications upon the property and along all street frontages adjoining the property upon which such building is constructed unless adequate improve ments already exist. Accessory structures with a valuation less than twenty -three thousand eight hundred twenty -eight dollars ($23,828.00), as determined by building permit valuation, and accessory structures to single -family residences shall be exempt fro m this section. In each instance, the city engineer shall determine whether the necessary improvements exist and are adequate. Each building permit application shall be so endorsed at the time it is issued. All new and redevelopment projects are subject to undergrounding of overhead utilities.
(b) The improvements required by subsection (a) of this section shall also apply to any person who enlarges or expands any building or dwelling in the city if the cost of such work exceeds twenty -three thousand eight hundred twenty -eight dollars ($23,828.00), as determined by building permit valuation. (c) By resolution of city council, such amount may be increased annually consistent with the International Code Council valuation scheduled for the appropriat e construction type. Tenant and façade improvements to any building that do not result in enlargement or expansion of the building area are exempt from public improvements and undergrounding of overhead utilities.
(d) In determining the building permit valuation, the building official shall examine the cumulative building permit valuation of multiple building permit applications within a twelve (12) month period to determine whether the development is exempt from this section.
(e) Projects developed under the provisions of sections 33-115 and/or 33-116 of the Escondido Zoning Code shall be exempt from the provisions of this section.

Easement(s) may be required for future public facilities, utilities, and/or access.

12. SEC. 23-47. UNDERGROUNDING REQUIRED OF THE ESCONDIDO MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 23-47. Undergrounding required.
(a) All development projects within the City of Escondido which are either new subdivisions or subject to section 23 -119 or 23 -120 shall be required to underground all utility distribution facilities, including cable television and other communication facilities.
(b) The developer shall make the necessary arrangements with each of the serving utilities, including those providing cable television, telephone, and other utility 174
Item8.

Ordinance 2022-19
Exhibit B

Page 20 of 20 ends
Page 20 of 20 ends

services, for the installation of such facilities. All transformers, terminal boxes, meter cabinets, pedestals, concealed ducts, and any other related facilities appurtenant to such underground utilities shall also be placed underground except in circumstances permitting above ground installations pursuant to conditions established by the director of community development.
(c) Projects developed under the provisions of sections 33-115 and/or 33-116 of the Escondido Zoning Code shall be exempt from the provisions of this section.

Easement(s) may be required for future public facilities, utilities, and/or access.

13. SEC. 32-204.02. REQUIREMENTS OF THE ESCONDIDO MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL BE REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

32.204.02. REQUIREMENTS
Before approval of a Final or Parcel Map for a subdivision, the subdivider shall:

A. Grade and improve or agree to grade and improve all land dedicated or to be dedicated for streets or easements, bicycle ways and all private streets and private easements laid out on a Final Map or Parcel Map in such manner and with such improvements as are necessary in accordance with the Escondido City standards; B. Install or agree to install sewers or sewage disposal systems in accordance with the Private Sewage Disposal Systems ordinance;
C. Provide proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that there exis ts an adequate potable water supply available to each lot or parcel and that the sub-divider will install or agree to install water supply facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer provided that the City Engineer may require such other system or size of water supply pipe as recommended by the water facility serving the subdivision; D. Install or agree to install as required by the City Engineer, fire hydrants and connections, which hydrants and connections shall be of a type approved by the Escondido Fire Chief; and
E. Construct or agree to construct all off -site improvements required by the City Engineer.

F. Subdivisions created under the provisions of section 33 -116 of the Escondido Zoning Code shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. Easement(s) may be required for future public facilities, utilities, and/or access.

175
Item8.

STAFF REPORT

August 24, 2022
File Number 0600-10; A-3424

SUBJECT

BID AWARD FOR THE GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESIGN

DEPARTMENT
Communications and Community Services

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -111, authorizing the Mayor, on behalf of the City, to execute a Consulting Agreement with LPA, Inc. in the amount of $1,040,400, for the completion of a Grape Day Park Master Plan and design of an Aquatic Center (“Project”) on Woodward Avenue.

Staff Recommendation: Approval (Communications and Community Services: Joanna Axelrod) Presenter: Danielle Lopez, Assistant Director of Community Services

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Adequate funding to pay for the Project has been set aside in the FY 22-23 Capital Improvement Program Budget which includes the Jim Stone Aquatic Facility Expansion Project funded through Park Development Fees and the Grape Day Park Project, funded through the American Rescue Plan.

PREVIOUS ACTION
On June 19, 2013, the City Council approved the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget for fiscal year 2013/14, that included funding in the amount of $100,000 for a Grape Day Park Master Plan and $120,000 for new play equipment.

On March 19, 2014, the City Council approved the consulting agreement with RHA for the Grape Day Park Master Plan and Grape Day Park play equipment design.

On February 4, 2015 , the City Council accepted the Grape Day Park c onceptual master plan and playground design.

On February 10, 2016 , the City Council authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Public Improvement Agreement in the amount of $341,870; and approve d a Budget Adjustment for the Grape Day Playground Improvement Project.
176
Item9.

On October 12, 2016, the City Council approved and accepted the public improvements and authorize d staff to file a Notice of Completion for the Grape Day Park Playground Improvement Project.

On June 8,2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-78, approving Fiscal Years 2022/23 – 2026/2027 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program Budget.

On September 29, 2021, the City Council adop ted Resolution No. 2021 -146 approving a budget adjustment allocating $22,808,509 of American Rescue Plan funds to a number of projects, including the Grape Day Park Project.

BACKGROUND
The Grape Day Park Master Plan and Aquatic Center Design Project includes updating the Grape Day Park Master Plan developed in 2014, which will serve as the framework for the final Master Plan to be developed by the Consultant. The new Master Plan will provide a number of improvements to the Park including a new restroom, designated outdoor event spaces, and an Aquatics facility. In addition to finalizing the Master Plan, the selected Consultant will design and prepare construction documents for a new Aquatics Facility that will meet the needs of our growing community.

On March 31, 2022, seven sealed bids wer e received in response to the advertised Request for Bids for the Project. The totals for the bids are listed below:

ADL Planning Associates $1,035,400
LPA, Inc. $1,040,400
JKA $1,290,975
DAHLIN Group Architecture $1,313,028
HGW $1,425,486
RJM Design Group $1,429,128
Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects $1,489,119

After interviewing the highest ranked firms, LPA, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified firm due to their extensive experience with sports and recreation facilities. Their dedicated in-house Sport and Recreation group features architects, landscape architects and engineers—all with specialized expertise creating vibrant venues that promote engagement, fun, and fitness. Staff recommends that the bid submitted by LPA, Inc. be considered the best value for the service provided and that the contract be awarded to LPA, Inc. in the amount of $1,040,400.

RESOLUTIONS
a. Resolution No. 2022-111
177
Item9.

ATTACHMENTS
a. Resolution No. 2022-111 – Exhibit A - Consulting Agreement 178
Item9.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-111

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR

TO EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, A CONSULTING

AGREEMENT FOR THE GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN

AND AQUATIC CENTER DESIGN PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City Council has allocated funding in the adopted Capital Improvement Program Budget for the Grape Day Park Master Plan and Aquatic Center Design Project; and WHEREAS, a notice inviting bids for said projects was advertised; and WHEREAS, seven sealed bids for the project were received on March 31, 2022 and evaluated; and WHEREAS, LPA, Inc. was determined to provide the best value for the service provided; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best public interest to authorize a Consulting Agreement with LPA, Inc. in the amount of $1,040,400.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California:

1. That the above recitations are true.

2. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor to execute, on behalf of the City, a Consulting Agreement with LPA, Inc. in a substantially similar form to that which is attached an d incorporated to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”, and subject to final approval as to Form by the City Attorney.

179
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 1 - CAO: 9/17/2021

CITY OF ESCONDIDO

CONSULTING AGREEMENT
This Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered in to as of this _____ day of _______________, 2022 (“Effective Date”),
Between: CITY OF ESCONDIDO
a California municipal corporation
201 N. Broadway
Escondido, CA 92025
Attn: [Joanna Axelrod]
(760) 839-4871
("CITY")
And: LPA, Inc
1600 National Ave.

San Diego, CA 92113
Attn: Arash Izadi
619-795-2555
("CONSULTANT").
(The CITY and CONSULTANT each may be referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”)
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that it is in the CITY’s best interest to retain the professional services of a consultant to update and finalize th e Grape Day Park Master Plan, design the aquatic facility, and oversee the construction of the aquatic facility; WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is considered competent to perform the necessary professional services for the CITY; and
WHEREAS, the CITY and CONSULTANT desire to enter into this Agreement for the per- formance of the Services described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, terms, and conditions set forth herein, and the mutual benefits derived therefrom, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Description of Services. CONSULTANT shall furnish all of the Services described in the Scope of Work, which is attached to this Agreement as Attachment “A” and incorporated herein by t his reference (“Services”).

2. Compensation. In exchange for CONSULTANT’s completion of th e Services, the CITY shall pa y, and CONSULTANT shall accept in full, an amount not to exceed the sum of $1,040,400.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 1 of 25 ends

180
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 2 - CAO: 9/17/2021
CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for performance of the Ser vices described in this Agreement. No compensation shall be provided for any other wor k or services without the CITY’s prior written consent. If this Agreement is amended at any tim e, additional compensation of CONSULTANT contained in any subsequent amendments shall not exc eed a cumulative total of 25% of the maximum payment provided for in this Section 2, unle ss approved by resolution of the City Council.

3. Performance. CONSULTANT shall faithfully perform the Servic es in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same or similar locality. In accordance with the foregoing standard, CONSULTANT shall be responsible fo r the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion, and coordination of all reports and other information furnished by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, except that CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the accuracy of information supplied by the CITY.

4. Personnel. The performance of the Services by certain professionals is significant to the CITY. As such, CONSULTANT shall only assign the persons listed on Attachment “B”, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by this reference (“Personnel List”), to perform the Services.

CONSULTANT shall not add or remove persons from the Personnel L ist without the City’s prior written consent. If CONSULTANT has not designated a person to perform a component of the Services, CONSULTANT shall not assign such component of the Services to a person without obtaining the City’s prior written consent. CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any component of the Services without obtaining the City’s prior written consent.

5. Termination. The Parties may mutually terminate this Agreem ent through a writing signed by both Parties. The CITY may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon providing CONSULTANT with 10 days’ advance written notice. CONSULTANT agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of any notice of termination. If the CITY terminates this Agreement due to no fault or failure of performance by CONSULTANT, then C ONSULTANT shall be compensated based on the work satisfactorily performed at the t ime of such termination. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to receive more than the amo unt that would be paid to CONSULTANT for the full performance of the Services.

6. City Property. All original documents, drawings, electronic media, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement immediately become the exclusive property of the CITY, and shall not be used by CONSULTANT for any other purpose witho ut the CITY’s prior written consent.

7. Insurance Requirements.
a. CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain, at its own cost, during the entire term of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services, and the results of such work, by CONSULTANT, its agents, repres entatives, employees, or subco ntractors. Insurance coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:
(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Form CG 00 01 covering Commercial General Liability on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & adve rtising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 general aggregate. (2) Automobile Liability. ISO Form CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if CONSULTANT has no owned autos, hired (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9) , with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage, unless waived by the CITY and approved in writing by the CITY’s Risk and Safety Division.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 2 of 25 ends

181
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 3 - CAO: 9/17/2021
(3) Workers’ Compensation. Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of California , with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) . Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) appropriate to CONSULTANT’s profession, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim and $2,000,000 aggregate.
(5) If CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums otherwise required by this Agreement, the CITY requires and sha ll be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by CONSULTANT. b. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement must be acc eptable to the City Attorney and shall meet the following requirements:
(1) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance coverage must be provided by an insurer authorized to conduct business in the state of California with a current A .M. Best’s rating of no less than A-: FSC VII, or as approved by the CITY.
(2) Additional Insured Status . Both the Commercial General Liability and the Automobile Liability policies must name the CITY (including its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers) specifically as an additional insured under the policy on a separate endorsement page. The Commercial General Liability additional insured endorsement shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if no t available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38, and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used. The Automobile Liability endorsement shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CA 20 01.
(3) Primary Coverage . CONSULTANT’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 with respect to the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (4) Notice of Cancellation . Each insurance policy shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with prior written notice to the CITY. (5) Subcontractors. If applicable, CONSULTANT shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated within this Agreement, and CONSULTANT shall ensure that the CITY (including its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers) is an additional insured on any insurance required from a subcontractor.
(6) Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby grants to the CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agree s to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this subsection shall apply regardless of whether or not the CITY ha s received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Any Workers’ Compensation policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogatio n in favor of the CITY for all work performed by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representativ es, employees, and subcontractors.
(7) Self-Insurance. CONSULTANT may, with the CITY’s prior written consent, fulfill some or all
of the insurance requirements contained in this Agreement u nder a plan of self- insurance. CONSULTANT shall only be permitted to utilize such self-insurance if, in the opinion of the CITY, CONSULTANT’s (i) net worth and (ii) reserves for payment of claims of liability against CONSULTANT are sufficient to adequately co mpensate for the lack of Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 3 of 25 ends

182
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 4 - CAO: 9/17/2021
other insurance coverage required by this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s utilization of self- insurance shall not in any way limit the liabilities assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.
(8) Self-Insured Retentions. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY.
c. Verification of Coverage. At the time CONSULTANT executes this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effec ting the insurance coverage required by this Agreement), which shall meet all requirements under this Agreement. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by this Agreement, at any time. d. Special Risks or Circumstances. The CITY reserves the right, at any point during the term of this Agreement, to modify the insurance requirements in this Agreement, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. e. No Limitation of Obligations. The insurance requirements in this Agreement, including the types and limits of insurance coverage CONSULTANT must maintain, and any approval of such insurance by the CITY, are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to any provisions in this Agreement concerning indemnification. f. Failure to comply with any of the insurance requirements in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, a lapse in any required insurance coverage during t he term of this Agreement, shall be a material breach of this Agreement. In the event that CONS ULTANT fails to comply with any such insurance requirements in this Agreement, in addition to any other remedies the CITY may have, the CITY may, at its sole option, (i) immediately terminate this Agreement; or (ii) order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold an y payment that becomes due to CONSULTANT until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the insurance requirements in this Agreement.

8. Indemnification, Duty to Defend, and Hold Harmless.
a. CONSULTANT (including CONSULTANT’s agents, employees, and subcontractors, if any) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, proceedings (including but not limited to legal and administrative proceedi ngs of any kind), suits, fines, penalties, judgments, orders, levies, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, or injuries, in law or equity, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorney’s fees and other related litigation costs and expenses (collectively, “Claims”), of every nature caused by, arising out of, or in connection with CONSULT ANT’s performance of the Services or its failure to comply with any of its obligations c ontained in this Agreement, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the CITY, and only to the extent such Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT. Further, in no event shall the cost to defend charged to the CONSULTANT exceed the CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault. b. CONSULTANT (including CONSULTANT’s agents, employees, and subcontractors, if any) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all Claims caused by, arising under, or resulting from any violation, or claim of violation, of the San Diego Municipal St orm Water Permit (Order No. R9- 2013-0001, as amended) of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 9, San Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 4 of 25 ends

183
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 5 - CAO: 9/17/2021
Diego, that the CITY might suffer, incur, or become subject to by reason of, or occurring as a result of, or allegedly caused by, any work performed pursuant to this Agreement. c. All terms and provisions withi n this Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

9. Anti-Assignment Clause. Because the CITY has relied on the particular skills of CONSULTANT in entering into this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not assign, delegate, subcontract, or otherwise transfer any duty or right under this Agreement, including as to any portion of the Services, without the CITY’s prior written consent. Any purported assignment, de legation, subcontract, or other transfer made without the CITY’s consent shall be void and inef fective. Unless CONSULTANT assigns this entire Agreement, including all rights and duties herein, to a third party with the CITY’s prior written consent, CONSULTANT shall be the sole payee under this Agreement. Any and all payments made pursuant to the terms of this Agreement are otherwise not assignable.

10. Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any action to enforce the te rms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

11. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contra ctor, and no agency or employment relationship is created by the execution of this Agreement.

12. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended except in a writing signed by the CITY and CONSULTANT.

13. Merger Clause. This Agreement, together with its attachments or other documents described or incorporated herein, if any, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the CITY and CONSULTANT concerning the subject of this Agreement and supersedes and replaces all prior negotiations, understandings, or proposed agreements, written or oral, except as otherwise provided herein. In the event of any conflict between the prov isions of this Agreement and any of its attachments or related documents, if any, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

14. Anti-Waiver Clause. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be waived by the CITY because of previous failure to insist upon strict performance, nor shall any provision be waived because any other provision has been waived by the CITY, in whole or in part.

15. Severability. This Agreement shall be performed and shall be enforceable to the full extent allowed by applicable law, and the illegality, invalidity, waiver, or u nenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the legality, validity, applicability, or enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

16. Governing Law. This Agreement and all rights and obligations arising out of it shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action arising from this Agreement shall be conducted only in the state or federal courts of San Diego County, California.

17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed on separate counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute on e and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by electronic m eans, including an attachment to an email, shall be effective as delivery of an executed original. The Agreement on file with the City is the copy of the Agreement that shall take precedence if any differences exist between or among copies or counterparts of the Agreement.

18. Provisions Cumulative. The foregoing provisions are cumulative to, in addition to, and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the CITY.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 5 of 25 ends

184
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 6 - CAO: 9/17/2021

19. Notice. Any statements, communications, or notices to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to the attention of the persons indicated herein, and the CITY and CONSULTANT shall promptly provide the other Party with notice of any changes to such contact information.

20. Business License. CONSULTANT shall obtain a City of Escondido Business License prior to execution of this Agreement and shall maintain such Business Li cense throughout the term of this Agreement.

21. Compliance with Laws, Permits, and Licenses. CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and other legal requirements in effect during the term of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall obtain any and all permits, licenses, and other authorizations necessary to perform the Services.

Neither the CITY, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers , officials, employees, or agents of the CITY, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this section.

22. Prevailing Wages. If applicable, pursuant to California Labor Code section 1770 et seq., CONSULTANT agrees that a prevailing rate and scale of wages, in accordance with applicable laws, shall be paid in performing this Agreement. CONSULTANT s hall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and other legal requirements pertaining to the payment of prevailing wages. The prevailing rate and scale to be paid shall be the same as the applicable “ General Prevailing Wage Determination” approved by the Department of Industrial Relatio ns as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, which are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/dprewagedetermination.htm and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Neither the CITY, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of the CITY, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this section.

23. Department of Industrial Relations Compliance. This public project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Rela tions. CONSULTANT shall post all job site notices required by regulation. CONSULTANT, as we ll as any subcontractors, shall be registered pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5 to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal (subject to the requirements of Public Contract Co de section 4104), or engage in the performance of any public works contract subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code. Neither the CITY, nor any elec ted or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, or agents of the CITY, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this section.

24. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. CONSULTANT shal l keep itself informed of and shall comply with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”). CONSULTANT represents and warrants that all of its employees and the employees of any subcontractor retained by CONSULTANT who perform any of the Services under this Agreement, are and will be authorized to perform the Services in full compliance with the IRCA. CONSULTANT affirms that as a licensed contractor and employer in the State of California, all new emp loyees must produce proof of eligibility to work in the United States within the first three days of employment and that only employees legally eligible to work in the United States will pe rform the Services. CONSULTANT agrees to comply with the IRCA before commencing any Services, and continuously throughout the performance of the Services and the term of this Agreement.

25. Effective Date. Unless a different date is provided in thi s Agreement, the effective date of this Agreement shall be the latest date of execution set forth by the names of the signatories below.

(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 6 of 25 ends

185
Item9.

Consulting Agreement (v2) - 7 - CAO: 9/17/2021

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by the Parties or their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date:

CITY OF ESCONDIDO

Date: __________________ ___________________________________ Paul McNamara
Mayor

LPA, Inc

Date: __________________ ___________________________________ Signature

___________________________________
John Mills, Chief Operating Officer (please print)

A
PPROVED AS TO FORM:

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MICHAEL R. MCGUINNESS, CITY ATTORNEY

B
Y: __________________________

THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST QUALIFIED PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 7 of 25 ends

186
Item9.

ATTACHMENT ‘A’
S

COPE OF WORK

CITY OF ESCONDIDO

GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN &

AQUATIC CENTER DESIGN
7/15/2022

A. GENERAL

LPA, Inc., a California Corporation (“Consultant”, or
“Architect”) will provide the City of Escondido, a
California municipal corporation (“City”) with
consulting services related to the master plan for
Grape Day Park and the replacement of the City’s
James Stone Swimming Pool with a new Aquatic
Center as described below in the Scope of Work.

Architect Contacts:

Arash Izadi, ASLA, LEED-AP
Director of Sport+Recreation
5301 California Avenue., Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92617
[email protected]
(949) 701-4059

John Courtney, ASLA, LEED-AP
Project Director
1600 National Avenue
San Diego, CA 92113
[email protected]
(619) 795-2555

B. LOCATION

Consultant shall provide services described in the
Scope of Work below at the addresses of Grape Day
Park, 321 N. Broadway, Escondido, California 92025
and James Stone Swimming Pool at 131 Woodward
Avenue, Escondido, California 92925.

C. SERVICES

LPA, Inc. understands the City is proposing to
update the master plan for Grape Day Park and
develop a new aquatic facility that replaces the
existing James Stone Swimming Pool adjacent to
the park. The scope may generally be described as
a
nd the project includes:

1. Master Plan
The master plan process will be an update to the
Draft Master Plan developed in 2014 with
anticipated updates that may include:

• Features proposed with the new restroom
facility project.
• Updated Aquatics Facility.
• Public art opportunities.
• Signage and way-finding program.
• Off-leash dog walk area.
• Landscaping and irrigation.
• Drainage and water management.

In addition to the items noted above, a Community
Engagement process will reaffirm the desire for
previously identified features and amenities as well
as new facilities and features to be incorporated into
the Master Plan Update.

2. Aquatic Center
The Aquatic Facility effort will include design and
documentation and may include:

• Lap / competition pool.
• R
ecreational pool.
• Splash pad.
• Pool support building.
• Parking lot reconfiguration.
• Landscaping and Irrigation.

This proposal is based on an assumed project budget
of up to $12 Million and a Construction Budget of up
to $8.4 Million, with the pool size(s), program and
required documentation based on this budget.

DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
(

BASIC SERVICES)

0 - GENERAL

D
uring the project, certain activities occur in each
phase. These activities, described below, are non-
sequential and may not be applicable to all phases
of the project. These activities include:

0.01 Project Administration services including:

.01 Initial consultation in development of
the Project.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 8 of 25 ends

187
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
.02 Preparation of compensation
estimates and professional services
agreement(s).
.03 Project-related research.
.04 Conferences.
.05 Communications.
.06 Travel time.
.07 Progress reports.
.08 Direction of the work of in-house
personnel.

0.02 Disciplines Coordination/Document Checking
services consisting of:

.01 Coordination between LPA's work
and the work of other involved
disciplines for the Project.
.02 Review and checking of documents
prepared for the Project.

0.03 Agency Consulting/Review/Approval
services including:

.01 Agency consultations.
.02 Preparation of written and graphic
explanatory materials.

0.04 City-Supplied Data Coordination services
including:

.01 Review and coordination of data
furnished for the Project as a
responsibility of the City.

1 - PREDESIGN SERVICES

In the Predesign Phase, LPA, INC. shall provide those
services necessary for LPA to assist the City in
establishing a program, financial and time
requirements, and limitations for the Project prior to
beginning design. The following descriptions shall
apply to those services.

1.01 Project Kickoff / “Plan the Plan Meeting”
services required to establish the following
detailed requirements for the Project.

.01 Initial meeting to review project
process, schedule, goals,
sustainability, budget, and
milestones.
.02 Review existing project information
including existing surveys, program
information, record drawings,
entitlements data, and other
available information.

1.02 Existing Facilities Surveys services
consisting of researching, assembling,
review and supplemental information for
Projects involving alterations and additions
to existing facilities or determining new
space usage in conjunction with a new
program including:

.01 Photography.
.02 Review of existing design data.
.03 Review of existing drawings.

1.03 Survey/Base Map Preparation.

.01 See Augmented Services.

1.04 Geotechnical services has the following
scope:

.01 Assist the City in establishing the
criteria and requirements for
geotechnical investigation and
required report for which all structural
and storm water improvements will be
based on.

1.05 Project Development Scheduling services
consisting of establishing and maintaining a
tentative schedule for predesign services,
decision-making, design, documentation,
contracting and construction, based on
determination of LPA's services, City
responsibilities and proposed design and
construction procedures.

1.06 Summary of Meetings: services consisting of
meeting attendance and presentations of
Predesign Phase and recommendations by
LPA, INC. as follows:

.01 One (1) – Kickoff Meeting (Plan The
Plan).

1.07 Summary of Deliverables:

.01 Program.
.02 Schedule.
.03 Meeting Minutes.

2 – GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND
C

OMMUNITY WORKSHOP SERVICES

2 .01 Site Analysis: Conduct analysis of the
existing site and record:

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 9 of 25 ends

188
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
.01 Circulation – Vehicular and
pedestrian connections relative to
the existing master plan. It is our
understanding the City has a
restroom project currently in
progress at the park. Once provided
by the City, LPA will consider the
design of the restroom project in the
park master plan.
.02 Existing trees to be protected in
place (based on city supplied
topographic survey and city supplied
arborist report of existing tree
conditions).
.03 Existing utilities and subsurface data
(based on City supplied utility
survey).
.04 Adjacent land uses, their
relationships and edge conditions.
.05 Natural elements: sun, wind, soils,
etc.
.06 Topography and surface drainage.
.07 Opportunities and constraints.

2.02 Workshop #1 -Staff In-House Workshop:

This is an opportunity to engage with
Community Services Staff, Public Works
Staff and other key department staff to hear
direct vision for programming
opportunities, operations and to develop
conceptual diagrams in a working session.

2.03 Workshop #2 - Community Workshop: The
first public workshop will present the Master
Plan process, focus on what the public sees
as community recreation characteristics,
issues and current opportunities and
constraints for the park.

2.04 Site Awareness Tour (Concurrent with
Workshop #2): This tour is an opportunity
for attendees to engage with the stie,
reflect on existing conditions and utilize a
tor workbook that LPA will develop to
encourage engagement.

2.05 Workshop 1, 2, and Site Awareness Tour
Summary – LPA will compile information
obtained in the two previous workshops
and the site awareness tour into a summary
document for use throughout the process
and as a record of community involvement.

2.06 Stakeholder Interviews: – Face-to-face
interviews with selected stakeholders such
as key City personnel, community leaders,
School District, and user group
stakeholders, etc., to provide the
opportunity to gain valuable perspective.

These interviews seek insight into the City’s
values, strengths, weaknesses, unique
attributes, distinctive competencies, and
initiatives as well as identify any private
sector and/or non-profit organizations and
their capabilities to compete or collaborate
with the City in delivery of recreation and
swimming programs and services. This
process lays the groundwork for an
engaging and active Public Involvement
Process. Consultants will work with Staff to
identify and schedule interviewees, with a
maximum of eight (8) interviews to be
scheduled over the course of one day.

2.07 Focus Group Meeting(s): The use of focus
groups is a method to engage stakeholders,
staff, community leaders, youth, or adults in
an interactive planning process. Focus
groups provide effective interaction with
specific population groups in more detail
than possible in a large group or one-on-
one setting. These groups may include
representatives from City staff, public
agencies, schools, public safety, non-profit
community agencies, business leaders,
faith-based organizations, special interest
groups, or others. LPA will facilitate three
(3) focus groups meetings (in a single day)
to elicit comments from the participants to
identify issues, concerns, and current or
emerging facility or program needs.

2.08 City-Wide Resident Web-Based Survey:

Resident surveys are a critical public
planning tool due to their ability to
represent the public as a whole with
statistical validity. They also are an
important validation check on the
feedback from those citizens who choose
to participate in venues such as public
workshops or other open
engagement. The City-wide surveying
will use up to 3 short surveys (for high
completion rates) and a target of 270 or
more completed responses each to
achieve statistical reliability of +/- 6%
margin of error with a 95% confidence
level. Results will be tabulated and
provided in graphic format that will
include geographically and
demographically indexed results for the
most helpful decision support.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 10 of 25 ends

189
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

2.09 City Steering Committee Meeting: Meeting
with the Project Oversight or Steering
Committee to review the findings of the
workshops to date and to finalize the
project program.

.01 Review program information from
the various outreach strategies.
.02 Meet with City Steering Committee
to confirm program requirements
and obtain direction on proposed
program.
.03 Design objectives, limitations, and
criteria.
.04 Space requirements.
.05 Site requirements.

2.10 Conceptual Diagram services consisting of
the development of up to three (3)
diagrammatic studies and pertinent
descriptive text for:

.01 Program elements identified in the
workshops.
.02 Human, vehicular and material flow
patterns.
.03 General space allocations.
.04 Adjacency.
.05 Flexibility and expandability.

2.11 Community Workshop #3 – The third
workshop will focus on recreation programs
and facilities input gathered during
Workshop #2. Conceptual diagrams
developed following the previous
workshops will be presented to participants
and feedback gathered.

2.12 Aquatic Committee Meeting: Special
meeting with a select aquatic committee to
review additional criteria, program
information and requirements for the
Aquatic Facility.

2.13 Conceptual Diagram Refinement services
consisting of refinement of the conceptual
diagrams into a single consensus master
plan and an aquatics concept plan.

.01 Consensus Master Plan.
.02 Aquatic Concept Plan.

2.14 Rough Order of Magnitude Cost services
consisting of development of a high-level cost
range for a single consensus plan the Project
based on the identified program elements,
expected Project delivery process, and
appropriate hard cost contingencies. Based
on ROM costs, consultant team may develop
conceptual phasing considerations /
recommendations for the aquatics facility to
respond to budgetary constraints of the City
finances.

2.15 City Steering Committee Meeting: Meeting
with the Project Oversight or Steering
Committee to review the final consensus
plan, rough order of magnitude costs.

.01 Review final consensus plan.
.02 Review Rough Order of Magnitude
Cost Range.
.03 Review potential aquatic center
phasing considerations.

2.16 Draft Master Plan Update – Prepare /
Update the draft master plan document
incorporating the following items:

.01 Introduction.
.02 Master Plan Vision, Goals and
Objectives.
.03 Existing Conditions.
.04 Summary of research, observations,
and community outreach results.
.05 Suggestions, rationales, and
recommendations for the placement
of amenities.
.06 Examples of the various program
elements.
.07 Implementation strategy/phasing
plan.
.08 Regulatory requirements.
.09 Preliminary Cost Range.

2.17 City Steering Committee Meeting: Meeting
with the Project Oversight or Steering
Committee to review the Draft Master Plan
and Aquatic Concept Plan.

2.18 Commission and Council Presentations:

Prepare for and attend commission,
committee, and council meetings to present
the Draft Master Plan.

.01 Planning Commission.
.02 Historic Preservation Committee.
.03 City Council.

2.19 Final Master Plan – Prepare a final master
plan document final incorporating
appropriate and reasonable City comments.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 11 of 25 ends

190
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

2.20 Summary of Meetings:

.01 One (1) – In-House City Staff
Workshop.
.02 Two (2) Community Workshop
Meetings.
.03 One (1) – Site Awareness Tour
(concurrent with Workshop 2).
.04 One (1) – Stakeholder Interviews (Up
to 8 in a single day)
.05 Up to Three (3) – Focus Group
Meetings (In a single day).
.06 One (1) – Aquatic Committee Meeting
.07 Up to Three (3) – Web Based Surveys.
.08 Up to Three (3) – City Steering
Committee Meetings.
.09 One (1) Each – Planning Commission,
Historic Committee, and City Council.

2.21 Summary of Deliverables:

.01 Agendas.
.02 Preliminary Master Plan Concepts.
.03 Aquatics Concept Plan.
.04 Consensus Summary Plan.
.05 ROM Cost Estimates and Conceptual
Phasing Considerations.
.06 Draft Master Plan.
.07 Final Master Plan.
.08 Workshop Activity Summaries.
.09 Meeting Presentations (where
appropriate).

3 – AQUATIC CENTER SCHEMATIC DESIGN
S

ERVICES

I
n the Schematic Design Phase, LPA, INC. shall
provide those services designated necessary to
prepare Schematic Design Documents consisting of
drawings and other documents illustrating the
general scope, scale, and relationship of Aquatic
Center Project components for approval by the City,
based on program requirements provided by the
City, and reviewed and agreed upon by LPA.

Aquatic Center Design will be limited to the aquatic
center only and will not include improvements to the
broader Grape Day Park or other Master Plan
program items. The following descriptions shall apply
to those services specific to the Aquatic Center site.

3.01 Architectural and Interior Design/
Documentation services responding to
program requirements and consisting of
preparation of preliminary documents for
the aquatics building.

.01 Conceptual site and floor plans.
.02 Preliminary selection of building
systems and materials.

3.02 Landscape Design/Documentation services
consisting of alternate materials, systems
and equipment and development of
conceptual design solutions for the
following:

.01 Material selection and plans
.02 Planting concept.
.03 Hardscape areas and materials.

3.03 Aquatics Documentation services consisting
of drawings and other documents
illustrating the scale and relationship for an 8
lane by 25-yard multipurpose lap pool,
Instructional Pool (approximately l1,700 sf)
and interactive Splash Pad (pool sizes and
quantity are subject to the budgetary
assumptions noted in this Scope of
Services):

.01 Conceptual Site Plan.
.02 Elevations of splash pad for
conceptual site plan.
.03 Cut sheets for proposed play
elements.
.04 Swimming Pool Plan View.
.05 Swimming Pool longitudinal
sections.
.06 Swimming Pool finish concepts.
.07 Recreation pool plan section and
finish concepts.

3.04 Structural Design/Documentation services
consisting of recommendations regarding
basic structural materials and systems,
analyses, and development of conceptual
design solutions for the specified structures.

.01 A preliminary structural system
concept.
.02 Preliminary structural design criteria.

3.05 Electrical Design/Documentation services
consisting of consideration of alternate
systems, recommendations regarding basic
electrical materials, systems and equipment,
analyses, and development of conceptual
design solutions for:

.01 Power service and distribution.
.02 Interior/exterior lighting.
.03 Communication systems.
.04 Special electrical systems (excluding
A/V).

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 12 of 25 ends

191
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
.05 General space requirements for
electrical equipment and BDF/IDF
rooms.

3.06 Mechanical and Plumbing Design/
Documentation services consisting of
consideration of alternate materials,
systems and equipment, and development
of conceptual design solutions for:

.01 Energy source(s).
.02 Energy conservation measures.
.03 Heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning.
.04 Energy management and controls.
.05 Plumbing.

3.07 Civil Design/Documentation services
consisting of development of conceptual
design solutions for site components. Off-
site areas, areas outside the property line,
city sidewalks and areas within the public
Right of Way are not included. Design
solutions will be developed for the following:

.01 On-site utility systems exhibit.
.02 Fire department access exhibit.
.03 Drainage systems concept.
.04 Conceptual grading concept exhibit.
.05 Stormwater management
requirements.
.06 Limits of demolition delineation.
.07 Parking lot layout.
.08 Off-site work limited to curb cuts
and curb returns only.

3.08 Coordination Meeting: Meeting with the City
Staff / Steering Committee to review
development of the documents, obtain
feedback on various studies and concepts
and finalize design components.

3.09 Project Development Scheduling services
consisting of reviewing and updating
previously established Project Schedules for
decision-making, design, documentation,
contracting and construction.

3.10 Statement of Probable Construction Cost
services consisting of development of a
probable construction cost range for the
Project based on the most recent schematic
design document, current and historic area,
volume, or other unit costs, expected Project
delivery process, and appropriate
contingencies.

3.11 Schematic Design Presentation: Present the
Schematic Design Package and Cost
Estimate to the Steering Committee for
approval.

3.12 Summary of Presentations / Meetings
services consisting of meeting attendance
and presentation of Schematic Design
Documents by LPA to the following City
representatives:

.01 One (1) – City Coordination Meeting.
.02 One (1) – Schematic Design
Presentation.

3.13 Summary of Deliverables consisting of:

.01 Schematic Design architectural and
structural for the structures.
.02 Schematic Design for civil
engineering, electrical, landscape
architecture and aquatics for the
site.
.03 Updated Project Schedule (if
applicable).
.04 Statement of Probable Construction
Cost.
.05 Meeting Minutes.

4 – AQUATIC CENTER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
S

ERVICES

I
n the Design Development Phase, LPA, INC. shall
provide those services designated necessary to
prepare from the approved Schematic Design
Documents, for approval by the City, the Design
Development Documents consisting of drawings and
other documents to fix and describe the size and
character of the entire Aquatic Center Project,
including architectural, structural, landscape
architecture, mechanical, aquatics and plumbing
systems, materials and such other elements as may
be appropriate. Consideration shall be given to
availability of materials, equipment and labor,
construction sequencing and scheduling. The
following descriptions shall apply to those services.

4.01 Architectural Design/Documentation
services consisting of continued
development and expansion of architectural
Schematic Design Documents to establish
the final relationships, forms, size, and
appearance of the Project architectural
components described in Section 3 through
the preparation of the following exhibits:

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 13 of 25 ends

192
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
.01 Plans, sections, and exterior
elevations.
.02 Typical construction details.
.03 Interior elevations.
.04 Final materials selections.
.05 Equipment layouts.

4.02 Landscape Design/Documentation services
consisting of continued development and
expansion of landscape Schematic Design
Documents and development of Outline
Specifications or materials lists to establish
final scope and preliminary details for
landscape work for the Project landscape
architecture components described in Section
3 through the preparation of the following
exhibits:

.01 Hardscape Plan.
.02 Typical Construction Details.
.03 Applicable Elevations.
.04 Planting Plans and Details.

4.03 Aquatics Documentation services consisting
of drawings and other documents to fix and
describe the size and character of the
swimming pool architectural, structural,
mechanical, and electrical systems, materials,
and such as other elements, as may be
appropriate, through the preparation of the
following exhibits:

.01 Swimming Pool/Recreation Pool plan
view.
.02 Swimming Pool/Recreation Pool
longitudinal and cross sections.
.03 Swimming Pool/Recreation Pool
finish details.
.04 Swimming Pool/Recreation Pool rail
goods/competitive equipment
details.
.05 Splash pad plan views.
.06 Splash pad longitudinal and cross
sections.
.07 Splash pad finish details.
.08 Splash pad play equipment and
details.
.09 Swimming pool and splash pad
equipment room dimensions.
.10 Utility requirements and points of
connection.
.11 HVAC requirements for pool
equipment.
.12 Outline specifications.

4.04 Structural Design/Documentation services
consisting of continued development of the
specific basic structural system(s) and
Schematic Design Documents in sufficient
details to establish:

.01 Final structural design criteria.
.02 Foundation and framing sizes.
.03 Lateral load resisting system.
.04 Critical coordination clearances.
.05 Outline specifications of material
lists.

4.05 Mechanical and Plumbing
Design/Documentation services consisting of
continued development and expansion of
mechanical Schematic Design Documents
and development of Outline Specifications or
materials lists to establish:

.01 Preliminary site utility connections.
.02 Approximate equipment sizes,
weights, and capacities.
.03 Preliminary equipment layouts.
.04 Required chases and clearances.
.05 Preliminary distribution and routing.
.06 Visual impacts.
.07 Plumbing requirements and
equipment.
.08 Preliminary energy calculations for
code compliance.

4.06 Electrical Design/Documentation services
consisting of continued development and
expansion of electrical Schematic Design
Documents and development of Outline
Specifications or materials lists to establish:

.01 Criteria for lighting, electrical and
communications systems.
.02 Approximate sizes and capacities of
major components.
.03 Preliminary electrical/low voltage/
fire alarm device layouts.
.04 Interior/exterior lighting fixture
layouts, control locations, and base
specifications.
.05 Required chases and clearances.

4.07 Civil Design/Documentation services
consisting of continued development and
expansion of civil Schematic Design
Documents and development of Outline
Specifications or materials lists to establish
the final scope and preliminary details for the
specified areas.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 14 of 25 ends

193
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

4.08 Interior Design/Documentation services
consisting of development of Outline
Specifications or materials lists to establish
the final scope and preliminary details.

4.09 Coordination Meeting: Meeting with the City
Staff / Steering Committee to review
development of the documents, obtain
feedback and finalize design components.

4.10 Project Development Scheduling services
consisting of reviewing and updating
previously established schedules of the
Project.

4.11 Statement of Probable Construction Costs
services consisting of updating and refining
the Schematic Design Phase Statement of
Probable Construction Cost of the Project,
taken into consideration:

.01 Availability of materials and labor.
.02 Project delivery procedures.
.03 Construction scheduling.
.04 Changes in scope of the Project.
.05 Adjustments in materials.

4.12 Design Development Presentation: Present
the Schematic Design Package and Cost
Estimate to the Steering Committee for
approval.

4.13 Summary of Presentations/Meetings services
consisting of presentation of Design
Development Drawings and other
documents by LPA to the following City
representatives:

.01 Two (2) – Steering Committee Design
Coordination Meeting.
.02 One (1) – Design Development and
Budget Presentation.

4.14 Summary of Deliverables consisting of:

.01 Building Design Development
drawings of architecture, interiors,
structural, mechanical, and electrical
design.
.02 Site Design Development drawings
of civil, aquatics, site electrical and
landscape architecture
requirements.
.03 Outline specification.
.04 Schedule update.
.05 Updated Statement of Probable
Construction Cost.

5 – AQUATIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION
D

OCUMENTS SERVICES

I
n the Construction Documents Phase, LPA, INC. shall
provide those services designated necessary to
prepare, from the approved Design Development
documents, for approval by the City, Construction
Documents for the Aquatic Center consisting of
Drawings, Specifications and other documents
setting forth in detail the requirements for
construction of the Project and bidding and
contracting for the construction of the Project. The
following descriptions shall apply to those services:

5.01 Architectural Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of Drawings based
on approved Design Development
Documents setting forth in detail the
architectural construction requirements for
the Project including the following:

.01 Final site plan.
.02 Floor plans.
.03 Sections/elevations.
.04 Details.
.05 Building systems/materials.
.06 Kitchen consultant coordination.
.07 Specifications.

5.02 Landscape Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development Documents, setting forth in
detail the landscape requirements for the
Project including the following:

.01 Materials and layout plans.
.02 Details.
.03 Sections and elevations.
.04 Planting plans and details.
.05 Irrigation plans and details.
.06 Specifications.

5.03 Aquatics Documentation services consisting
of drawings and specifications setting forth in
detail the requirement for construction of the
aquatic components including the following
for the swimming pools and splash pad:

.01 Architectural drawings.
.02 Structural drawings.
.03 Mechanical drawings.
.04 Electrical drawings.
.05 Specifications.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 15 of 25 ends

194
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

5.04 Structural Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of final structural
engineering calculations, Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development documents, setting forth in
detail the structural construction
requirements for the Project including the
following:

.01 Structural details and systems.
.02 Structural calculations.
.03 Specifications.

5.05 Mechanical Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of final mechanical
engineering calculations, Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development documents, setting forth in
detail the mechanical construction
requirements for the Project including the
following:

.01 Mechanical details and plans.
.02 Details and systems.
.03 Calculations.
.04 Specifications.

5.06 Electrical Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of final electrical
engineering calculations, Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development Documents including the
following:

.01 Electrical plans.
.02 Calculations.
.03 Details and schedules.
.04 Specifications.

NOTE: Security system design and
engineering are not included.

5.07 Civil Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of final civil
engineering calculations, Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development documents, setting forth in
detail the civil construction requirements for
the Project including the following:

.01 Demolition Plan.
.02 Horizontal Plan.
.03 Pavement Plan.
.04 Wet Utilities Plan.
.05 Final Grading Plan.
.06 Management Plan.
.07 Specifications.

5.08 Interior Design/Documentation services
consisting of preparation of Drawings and
Specifications based on approved Design
Development documents, setting forth in
detail the requirements for interior
construction for the Project including the
following:

.01 Finish plans.
.02 Reflected ceiling plans.
.03 Plan enlargements.
.04 Elevations.
.05 Details.
.06 Specifications.

5.09 Materials Research/Specifications during the
Construction Documents Phase consisting of:

.01 Assistance to the City in
development of Bidding documents.
.02 Assistance to the City in
development of their prepared
Conditions of the Contract (General,
Supplementary, and other
Conditions).
.03 Development and preparation of
Specifications describing materials,
systems and equipment,
workmanship, quality, and
performance criteria required for the
construction of the Project.
.04 Compilation of Project Manual
including Conditions of the Contract,
Bidding Documents and
Specifications.

5.10 Statement of Probable Construction Cost
services consisting of updating of the Design
Development Phase Statement of Probable
Construction Cost of the Project, taking into
account:

.01 Changes in materials, systems or
details of construction which have
occurred during preparation of the
Construction Documents.
.02 Known changes in the cost of
materials, labor, and services since
preparation of the previous
Statement of Probable Construction
Cost.
.03 Adjustments for known or
anticipated changes in the bidding
market relative to the Project.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 16 of 25 ends

195
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

5.11 Summary of Presentations / Meetings
services consisting of meeting attendance
and presentations of Construction
Documents and special presentation graphics
by LPA to the following City representatives:

.01 One (1) - Steering Committee
Meeting(s).
.02 One (1) – Agency Submittal and
Budget Review.

5.12 Summary of Deliverables consisting of:

.01 Bid-ready construction plans and
specifications.
.02 Statement of Probable Construction
Cost.
.03 Digital copy of plans and
specifications.
.04 Mylar copy of plans and specifications.

6 – AQUATIC CENTER BIDDING / NEGOTIATION
S

ERVICES

I
n the Bidding or Negotiations Phase, LPA, INC.,
following the City approval of the Construction
Documents and of the most recent Statement of
Probable Construction Cost, shall provide those
services designated necessary for LPA to assist the
City in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals and in
awarding and preparing contracts for construction of
the Aquatic Center. The following descriptions shall
apply to those services assigned as the responsibility
of the party indicated therein.

6.01 Bidding Materials services consisting of
assisting the City with:

.01 Coordination.
.02 Completeness review.

6.02 Addenda services consisting of preparation
and distribution of Addenda as may be
required during bidding or negotiation and
including supplementary Drawings,
Specifications, instructions, and notice(s) of
changes in the bidding schedule and
procedure based on the approved
Construction Documents.

6.03 Bidding/Negotiations services consisting of:

.01 Assistance to the City in establishing
a list of Bidders or proposers.
.02 Assisting to City in establishing
Prequalification requirements for
Bidders or proposers, where
appropriate.
.03 Participation in pre-bid conference.
.04 Responses to questions from Bidders
or proposers and clarifications or
interpretations of the Bidding
Documents.
.05 Attendance at bid opening.

6.04 Analysis of Alternates/Substitutions services
consisting of consideration, analyses,
comparisons, and recommendations relative
to alternates or substitutions proposed by
Bidders or proposers prior to receipt of Bids
or proposals.

6.05 Bid Evaluation services consisting of:

.01 Participation in reviews of Bids or
proposals.

6.06 Construction Contract Agreements services
consisting of:

.01 Preparation and distribution of sets
of Contract Documents for execution
by parties to the Contract(s).

6.07 Summary of Presentations / Meetings
services consisting of presentation of
Construction Documents and other
documents by LPA to the following City
representatives:

.01 One (1) – Prebid Conference
.02 One (1) – Bid Opening

6.08 Summary of Deliverables consisting of:

.01 Bid documents.
.02 Addenda.

7 – AQUATIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION
C

ONTRACT OBSERVATION SERVICES

I
n the Construction Contract Observation Phase,
LPA, INC. shall provide those services designated
necessary for the administration of the Aquatic
Center construction contract as set forth in the
General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.

Unless otherwise provided in the Scope of Services,
LPA duties and responsibilities during construction
shall be as set forth in the Agreement between the
City and Architect for Designated Services. The
following descriptions shall apply to those services:

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 17 of 25 ends

196
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

7.01 Office Construction Administration services
consisting of:

.01 Processing of submittals, including
receipt, review of, and appropriate
action on Shop Drawings, Product
Data, Samples, and other submittals
required by the Contract Documents.
.02 Distribution of submittals to the City,
Contractor and/or LPA's field
representative, as required.
.03 Maintenance of master file of
submittals.
.04 Related communications.

7.02 Construction Field Observation services
consisting of visits to the site as noted below
to become generally familiar with the
progress and quality of the Work and to
determine in general if the Work is
proceeding in accordance with the Contract
Documents and preparing related reports and
communications. Site visits are based on bi-
weekly meetings for Sixty (60) weeks of
construction for a total of Thirty (30)
meetings. Structural observation field visits
will be based on the critical stage of
construction.

7.03 Supplemental Documents services consisting
of:

.01 Preparation, reproduction and
distribution of supplemental
clarification Drawings,
Specifications, and interpretations in
response to requests for information
by Contractor or the City and, as
required, by construction.
.02 Forwarding the City’s instructions
and providing guidance to the
Contractor on the City’s behalf
relative to changed requirements
and schedule revisions.

7.04 Quotation Requests/Change Orders services
consisting of:

.01 Preparation, reproduction and
distribution of Drawings and
Specifications to describe Work to
be added, deleted, or modified.
.02 Review of proposals from
Contractor(s) for reasonableness of
quantities and costs of labor and
materials.
.03 Review and recommendations
relative to changes in time for
Substantial Completion.
.04 Coordination of communications,
approvals, notifications, and record-
keeping relative to changes in the
Work.

7.05 Project Schedule Monitoring services
consisting of monitoring the progress of the
Contractor(s) relative to established
schedules and making status reports to the
City.

7.06 Project Closeout / Substantial Completion
services initiated upon notice from the
Contractor(s) that the Work, is sufficiently
complete, in accordance with the Contract
Documents, to permit occupancy or
utilization for the use for which it is intended,
and consisting of:

.01 A review with the City’s
representative for conformity of the
Work to the Contract Documents to
verify the list submitted by the
Contractor of items to be completed
or corrected.
.02 Review upon notice by the
Contractor that the Work is ready for
final review and acceptance.
.03 Notification to the City and
Contractor of deficiencies found in
follow-up review, if any.
.04 Final review with the City
representative to verify final
completion of the Work.
.05 Receipt and transmittal of
warranties, affidavits, receipts,
releases and waivers of lien or bonds
indemnifying the City against liens.

7.07 Record Drawings services consisting of:

.01 Making arrangements for obtaining
from Contractor(s) and other parties
information certified by them on all
changes made during construction
from the initial Contract Documents
and on the location of concealed
systems as installed during
construction.
.02 Review of general accuracy of
information submitted and certified
to by the Contractor(s).
.03 Transmittal of record drawings and
general data, appropriately
Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 18 of 25 ends

197
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
identified, to the City and others, as
directed.

7.08 Summary of Meetings services consisting of
presentation of Construction Documents and
other documents by LPA to the following City
representatives:

.01 Thirty (30) – Bi-Weekly Meetings.
.02 One (1) – Project Close Out Reviews.

7.09 Summary of Deliverables:

.01 Field Reports/communications.

8 – AUGMENTED SERVICES

T
he following are included in the Scope of Services
and are in addition to the Basic Services noted in
Tasks 1 – 7.

8.01 Cost Estimating services provided at the
following milestones as described:

.01 Programming / Conceptual Design.
.02 Aquatic Center Schematic Design.
.03 Aquatic Center Design Development.
.04 Aquatic Center Construction
Documents.

8.02 Aquatic Center Topographic Survey has the
following scope:

.01 Field Establish Control, set aerial
targets, fly 1”=40’ scale aerial
Topography.
.02 Design Survey to supplement aerial
survey.
.03 Plot Record Property lines based
upon City provided title report.
.04 We understand the City has an
existing topographic survey of Grape
Day Park. LPA will review the
provided survey and where possible
or practical, may utilize the survey to
reduce the limits of supplemental
survey work at the aquatic facility.

8.03 Aquatic Center Underground Utility Survey
has the following scope:
.01 Utilizing the same limits of surveying
as the topographic survey, utilize
location equipment to determine the
presence of and approximate
locations and estimated depth of
underground utilities that can be
detected with commonly available
locating equipment, such as
electromagnetic, CCTV push camera,
ground penetrating radar (GPR),
locatable duct rodder.

8.03 Aquatic Center SWPPP services include
preparation of a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan.

8.04 Aquatic Center WQMP services include
preparation of a Water Quality Management
Plan / Stormwater Management Plan within
the limits of the proposed project

8.05 Aquatic Center Operational and Market Study

.01 Project Overview
a. Project review and update.
b. Identify constraints and
parameters.
c. Meet with project team.

.02 Market Analysis
a. Service areas identification.
b. Demographic.
c. Characteristics/community
profile.
d. Review of existing city program.
e. Competitive market analysis
f. Comparison with national,
regional, and local participation
statistics/trends.

.03 Operational Plan
a. Use estimates.
b. Fee structure.
c. Sources of income.
d. Operating cost projections.
e. Revenue generation projections.
f. Revenue / expenditure
comparisons.
g. Capital improvement allocation.

.04 Final Report
a. Incorporate City comments.
b. Develop final report.
c. Develop executive summary.

.05 Meetings
a. One (1) - Market Analysis
presentation.
b. One (1) - Operational Plan
presentation.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 19 of 25 ends

198
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS

T
he following are Scope of Work assumptions:

1. CONSULTANTS: The work of the
a
forementioned consultants is included as
part of this Scope of Services and will be
billed at their fee plus 20% for LPA’s
coordination.

2. SURVEY: The topographic survey is provided
a
s an augmented service and is limited to the
aquatic area only and does not encompass
the broader Grape Day Park, offsite areas, or
areas beyond the immediate limits of the
aquatic facility. The plotting of the Record
Property Lines is considered preliminary and
subject to change if a Boundary Survey is
performed.

3. TITLE REPORT: City to provide a
c
omprehensive single title report from
which all relevant property line, easement
and legal boundaries will be plotted.

4. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING: The City
s
hall provide a geotechnical report from
which all structural information shall be
based.

5. UTILITY LOCATING / FORENSICS: The city
i
s to provide an accurate utility plan
indicating the location, type, and depth of
all utilities.

6. APPROVAL: The City’s written request to
c
ommence each task constitutes approval
of prior work. Changes in subsequent work
will be considered additional services,
documented, and billed on an hourly basis.

7. MARKET / OPERATIONAL REPORT: A
m
arket and operational report has been
included as an optional service and is in
addition to the Basic Services.

8. CONSULTANTS: The work of the Architect,
L
andscape Architect, Structural Engineer,
Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer,
Electrical Engineer, Cost Estimator,
Aquatics Consultant, and the Irrigation
Consultant are included as part of this
contract. Any other necessary consultants
are in addition to the contract and will be
billed at fee, plus 10% for coordination.

9. REIMBURSABLES: All project expenses shall
b
e reimbursed to LPA by the City at a
multiple of 1.10. Project expenses include,
but are not necessarily limited to, all normal
costs involving models, renderings,
document reproduction, plotting, deliveries,
mileage, and approved travel. Unless
otherwise agreed to in writing, all
governmental taxes and fees will be paid
directly by the City. These taxes and fees
are separate and are not a part of LPA’s
reimbursable allowance. Unless specifically
noted as being included in a ‘stipulated
sum’, all consultant fees shall be subject to a
multiple of 1.10.

10. RESPONSIBILITIES: LPA will be responsible
f
or Master Planning Services and
Community Outreach (as noted), and
Schematic Design, Design Development,
Construction Documents, Bid Negotiations,
and Construction Administration for the
Aquatic Complex as stated on this this
Scope of Services. Offsite related work for
any area and development of detailed
design, Schematic Design or Construction
Documents for Grape Day Park are
excluded.

11. AGENCY APPROVAL: It is assumed all
p
ermitting and approval will be through the
City of Escondido and County Health
Department. Submittals to any other
agency including DSA or the requirement of
obtaining approvals from any other agency
is excluded and may be provided as an
optional service. Based on preliminary
discussions with DSA regarding similar
projects, if a joint use agreement is
developed with the School District and/or
funding is utilized from the School District it
is highly likely that DSA will require a full
review and approval as the Lead Agency
superseding City requirements. LPA will
review the project specifics with the City
and include a virtual meeting with LPA’s
entitlements coordinator to review DSA’s
requirements and assist in determining if a
review by DSA is required.

12. RATE SCHEDULE: The attached LPA hourly
r
ate schedule became effective March 2022,
however, is subject to change without
notification.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 20 of 25 ends

199
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

13. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Tasks not included
i
n this Scope of Services but requested by
the City shall be identified as such and billed
at an hourly rate unless a detailed scope of
services proposal is requested.

14. SPECIFICATIONS: The City shall provide the
S
tandard General Conditions, Special
Conditions, and Bidding Instructions.

Consultant shall utilize CSI standard format
for technical specifications and refer to and
include by reference the 2021 Standard
Specifications for Public Works
Construction (“Greenbook”).

15. FEES: The City shall pay all government
f
ees, permits, assessments, etc.

16. SPECIAL MEETINGS: Necessary preparation
t
ime and attendance at public hearing,
Council Meetings, Commission Meetings s or
agency meetings (other than as noted in
this Scope of Services) by LPA, INC. are not
within this Scope of Services.

17. MASTER PLAN: It is assumed the master
p
lan and aquatic facility will be developed
concurrently with meetings addressing both
items unless noted otherwise in this Scope
of Services. The Master Plan is assumed to
be an “Update” and not a comprehensive
development of a New Master Plan. All
previously developed information including
the existing Draft Master Plan will be
provided to LPA in a usable manner directly
editable without requiring extensive
redevelopment, word processing or other
efforts.

18. PROJECT PHASES: This proposal is based
o
n the assumption that the project shall be
installed in one phase. Additional phasing
of the project shall require changes to the
Construction Documentation, Bid
Negotiation and Construction
Administration phases of work. Additional
work due to phasing of the project shall be
considered as additional services.

19. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: The
C
onstruction Documents will be developed
as one set of documents. The scope of work
does not include a separate set of off-site
improvements. If the City requires a
separate set of documents for early bid
packages, early demo packages or for off-
site, etc., LPA will provide these drawings as
an additional service.

20. ELECTRICAL EXCLUSIONS: Temporary
p
ower design is excluded.

21. LEED/SUSTAINABLE DOCUMENTATION:

T
he design or documentation of LEED or
other sustainable tracking/certification
process is excluded and may be provided as
an additional service.

22. PHOTOVOLTAIC / SOLAR WATER: The
d
esign and/or documentation of
photovoltaic or solar water systems are
excluded and may be provided as an
additional service.

23. CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT EXCLUSIONS:

I
mprovements to adjacent city streets are
excluded. Any work requiring a dedicated
or unique set of documents separate from
the comprehensive set being prepared for
on-site related work is excluded and may be
provided as an additional service.

24. ENVIRONMENTAL: All CEQA related work
i
ncluding but not limited to studies for area
wide traffic impacts, cultural resources,
stream preservation or modification, soil
mitigation or clean-up, oil operations,
arborists study of existing tree conditions,
regional drainage study, and sensitive
h
abitat are not included in this proposal. It
is anticipated that the City has the existing
studies required.

25. EXISTING TREES: City to supply a complete
a
rborist report of existing trees with genus,
species, condition, and recommendations.

26. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Submittal and/or
p
reparation of any documents for Planning
Department are excluded.

27. OFF-SITE: Off-site infrastructure is in place
a
nd adequate connection points for storm
drain, water, and sewer are available at the
limits of the proposed aquatic facility (or on-
site) to serve the proposed development.

No studies of utilities beyond the immediate
limit of the aquatic facility are included.

28. ACCESS: Access points to the adjacent
s
treets have been previously established and
Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 21 of 25 ends

200
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022
no improvements other than minor curb cuts
are anticipated.

29. BOUNDARY: The boundary corners for the
s
ite have been established and monumented
by others.

30. FLOOD PLAIN: The site is not located within
t
he limits of a 100-year floodplain and will
not include any new regional drainage
improvements. No on-site retention is
anticipated.

31. MAILERS AND OUTREACH: All mailers,
n
oticing and outreach to the community
and/or stakeholders (or any other group)
shall be by the City. LPA may assist in the
development of graphics for fliers and similar
items if required.

32. ESCONDIDO CREEK: Studies, coordination
w
ith or any required documentation related
to Escondido Creek is excluded.

33. ACOUSTICS: Acoustic studies or any other
s
pecial study is excluded. All required
information related to acoustics is to be
provided by the City.

34. RECORD DRAWINGS: Information is to be
p
rovided by the Contractor. Any drafting
services required by the City can be provided
on an hourly basis.

35. FIELD SURVEY STAKING: Project General
C
ontractor will provide all field survey
staking, as-built survey and plans, and
grading and wet utilities substantial
conformance letter.

36. SCOPE AND FEES: LPA’s scope and fees are
b
ased on an assumed level of documentation
as described in this Scope of Services with a
construction budget of up to $8.4 million.

Based on the scope preliminarily identified in
the RFP, the actual construction cost may
exceed the budget assumptions noted and
may require additional documentation. If the
approved budget is increased from the $8.4
Million noted, LPA’s fees will be adjusted up
at the same percentage as the original
proposal.

37. MEETINGS: Where the maximum number of
m
eetings to be included in Architect’s
services is specified herein, Architect and
architect’s consultants agree to attend, and
participate in, as many meetings as specified
as part of the Basic Services. Meetings in
excess of those specified will be billed as
Additional Services.

38. DELIVERABLES: The preceding description
o
f services general outlines the activities
associated with executing each phase of
work. The necessity for, and the extent to
which, the Architect and Architect’s
consultants must commit time and resources
to any specific activity will vary depending
on the needs of the project. Consequently,
the description of services does not
represent a comprehensive list of
deliverables.

39. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION: All
c
onsultations and coordination not
associated with specific meetings shall be
conducting at the sole discretion of the
Architect and Architect’s consultants, and
only as necessary for the Architect and
Architect’s consultants to complete the
professional services of this agreement.

40. DOCUMENTS: Documents described in the
p
receding description of services shall be
provided, as appropriate, for the needs of
the project and to a level of detail consistent
with the standard of practice for this type of
project and for the geographical area and
regulatory jurisdiction(s) in which the project
is located.

41. PROJECT CONTROL: The Architect shall not
h
ave control over or charge of and shall not
be responsible for construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures, or for safety precautions and
programs in connection with the Work, since
these are solely the Contractor’s
responsibility under the Contract for
construction. Without in any way limiting the
Architect’s responsibilities and obligations
under Title 21 of the California Code of
Regulations or the Building Standards
published by the ICBO (formerly Title 24 of
the California Code of Regulations), the
Architect shall not otherwise be responsible
for the Contractor’s schedules or failure to
carry out the work in accordance with the
Contract Documents. The Architect shall not
have control over or charge of acts or
omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors,
or their agents or employees, or of any other
persons performing portions of the Work.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 22 of 25 ends

201
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

D. SCHEDULING

The Scope of Work shall commence upon execution
o
f this agreement, estimated approximately on or
around July 27, 2022. The following are approximate
schedule durations for each of the phases of the
project, based on a late July ‘22 starting date and
shall be updated at each milestone of the project for
City review and approval.

Phase Duration Approximate Dates Master Plan 8 mo. Jul. ‘22 – Feb. ‘23 Schematic Design 3 mo. Feb. ‘23 – Apr. ‘23 Design Development 3 mo. May. ’23 – Jul. ‘23 Construction Documents 3 mo. Aug. ’23 – Oct. ‘23
Agency Review 4 mo. Oct. ’23 – Jan. ‘24 Bidding/Negotiations 3 mo. Feb. ’24 – Mar. ‘24 Constr. Observation 18 mo. Mar. ’24 – Sept. ‘25

E. CONTRACT PRICE AND

PAYMENT TERMS

The following is the proposed compensation for the
Scope of Work identified. The contract price total
dollar amount is an estimated fee based on an
assumed Project Budget of $12 Million and a
Construction Cost of up to $8,400,000. Upon
confirmation of the budget at the end of Schematic
Design, LPA’s fees and services will be adjusted up to
reflect the final budget and related documentation
and locked in at that time.

The contract price shall not exceed $1,040,400.00
without written approval from the City, and includes
basic services, augmented services and reimbursable
expenses and does not include optional services. The
contract price for the work includes all labor,
materials, equipment, reimbursable expenses and
transportation required to perform the work
referenced above in the Scope of Work. Pending
confirmation of the scope, the following fees may be
adjusted to align with the services noted.

*Master Plan

Master Plan: $146,000
Subtotal Master Planning $146,000

Documentation (Basic Services)
Schematic Design: $ 107,100
Design Development (30% CD): $ 164,200
Construction Documents: $ 214,200
Bidding: $ 21,420
Construction Observation $ 207,080
Subtotal Documentation (Basic
Srvcs.) $ 714,000

*Augmented Services

Topographic Survey: $ 38,856
Underground Utilities Survey: $ 17,244
Cost Estimating $ 46,800
SWPPP $ 6,000
WQMP/Storm Water Quality Mgmt.

Plan
Operational & Market Study
$ 6,000

$ 24,600
Subtotal Augmented Services $ 139 ,400

Reimbursable Allowance
TOTAL
$
41,000
$1,040,400
Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 23 of 25 ends

202
Item9.

SCOPE OF SERVICES I GRAPE DAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND AQUATIC CENTER DESI GN 6/15/2022

*Augmented Services: Augmented Services are in
addition to the Basic Services noted in the Master
Plan and Documentation scopes but are included in
the overall project scope and contract price.

Reimbursable expenses are in addition to
compensation and typically run approximately %5 -
10% of a total project fee. They include costs for
reproduction, plotting, express mailing, delivery
charges, mileage, travel, and overhead on consultant
invoices.

Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to the City,
and the City shall pay Consultant for invoiced
services within 30 days of receipt of invoices for
those services.

BASIC HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE

Principal $280.00

Director $240.00
Discipline Director $260.00
Project Director $250.00
Project Leader $200.00
Design Coordinator II $170.00
Manager $165.00
Design Coordinator I $145.00
Senior Specialist $140.00
Designer III $135.00
Specialist III $110.00
Designer II $120.00
Specialist II $95.00
Designer I $110.00
Specialist I $85.00
Intern $85.00

N
OTE: These rates became effective March 2022
and are subject to change annually.

PR

OPOSED CONSULTANT/DISCIPLINES

A
rchitecture: LPA
Landscape Architecture: LPA
Interior Design: LPA
Structural: LPA
Civil: LPA
Mechanical/Plumbing: LPA
Aquatics: Aquatic Design Group
Cost Estimating: HL Construction
Management
Irrigation Design: Sweeney and Associates
**Optional
Market/Operations:

Ballard*King

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 24 of 25 ends

203
Item9.

Resolution No. 2022-111
Exhibit "A"

Page 25 of 25 ends

204
Item9.

STAFF REPORT

August 24, 2022
File Number 1080-65

SUBJECT

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY UPDATE

DEPARTMENT
Police Department & Development Services Department

RECOMMENDATION
Request that the City Council receive a presentation and hold a workshop to discuss transportation safety.

Staff Recommendation: Receive and File ( Development Services / Engineering , Edd Alberto), (Police Department/ Interim Chief of Police, Dave Cramer)

BACKGROUND
A Transportation Safety Workshop with City Council was held on November 17, 2021 with a presentation provided by the Chief of Police and City Engineer . The goal of the workshop was to provide background information on transportation safety, including City programs and projects designed to improve safety.

At that meeting, the City Council requested an annual transportation safety update.

Programs
The City’s approach to traffic safety is a multi-facetted, collaborative effort involving police, public works, engineering, schools, and other community partners. There are a number of programs that focus on improving the built environment to maximize transportation safety. These include the following:

I. Programs Designed to Evaluate, Prioritize and Complete Safety Improvements  Traffic Management Projects List (TMPL): This program allows members of the public, community partners, and City staff to nominate traffic safety improvement proj ects for consideration and funding through the capital improvement program budget. Projects nominated for consideration are prioritized for funding by the Transportation and Community Safety Commission (TCSC) using adopted scoring criteria that considers collision history, measured roadway speeds, bike and pedestrian volumes, vehicular volumes, roadway geometrics, and solution effectiveness. In July of each year, between three and five of the highest priority projects are selected by the TCSC and completed during the fiscal year. Projects have included crosswalk improvements at high pedestrian areas, traffic calming projects, pedestrian countdown timers , and accessible pedestrian signals. The program has an annual budget of $50,000. 205
Item10.

o FY 2021-22 TMPL funde d improvements around Mission Middle School, Oak Hill Elementary School, and North Broadway Elementary School. The improvements include high visibility crosswalks, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), radar speed feedback signs, ADA curb ramps, and roadway restriping. o FY 2022 -23 TMPL projects were evaluated and selected during the July 14, 2022 Transportation and Community Safety Commission. Improvements around Hidden Valley Middle School, Felicita Elementary School, the intersection of Felicita Avenue & Montview Drive, and the intersection Vista Avenue and McGeary Road are to be funded this fiscal year. The improvements include high visibility crosswalks, signage, radar speed feedback signs, ADA curb ramps, and roadway restriping.

 Traffic Signal Priority List (TSPL) : Based on collision data, police department input , and requests from the public, locations warranting a new signal or the addition of protected left turns (green arrows) at existing signals are evaluated and prioritized. This list prioritizes the installation of new signals and modifications to existing signals using a data -driven approach. The priority list for installation of protected left turns (green arrows) on existing signals is based on left turn collision rates, traffic speeds, and left turn volume. Below is the ranking of the locations that was adopted by the City Council in April. While these rankings guide the priority for use of the City funding, criteria for specific grant programs can enable construction at s ome locations more quickly than others. In April 2021, the City Council adopted the 2021 Traffic Signal Priority List. The tables below show the intersection rankings and status:

New Traffic Signal Rankings
Rank Study Intersection Status/Funding
1 Rock Springs Road / Lincoln Ave Design/ Developer
2 Harding Street / Lincoln Ave Not Yet Funded
3 Lomas Serenas Dr / Via Rancho Pkwy Not Yet Funded

Protected Left Turn Signal Rankings
1 Bear Valley Pkwy / Mary Lane Construction/ TransNet
2 Metcalf Street / Mission Ave HSIP Grant Application
3 Quince Street / Washington Ave HSIP Grant Application 4 Fig Street / East Valley Pkwy HSIP Grant Application
5 Rose Street / Washington Av Design/ HSIP Grant Application 6 Fig Street / Mission Avenue HSIP Grant Application
7 Centre City Pkwy / Ninth Ave HSIP Grant Application
8 Rock Springs Road / Mission Av Design/ Developer
9 Juniper Street / Felicita Ave Bid/ATP Grant
10 Escondido Boulevard /Grand Ave HSIP Grant Application 206
Item10.

 Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP): The City Council approved the LRSP on May 25, 2022. The LRSP is a comprehensive, Citywide study that is a risk -based, data -driven, systemic approach to improving local roadways. The highest priority locations for future safety improvements are identified after considering all Citywide collision data over a five-year timeframe. The criteria for evaluation and prioritization are based on detailed criteria set by Caltrans that includes both the number and severity of collisions. Countermeasures are identified for each of the highest priority locations. The LRSP is a requirement to apply for Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding.

 Walk Audits: In cooperation with COMPACT, school district staff, school Principals, police officers, and engineering staff have conducted pedestrian safety and drop -off and pick-up evaluations at 11 school sites in the past 12 months. Guidance on management of drop -off and pick-up areas, and recommendations for improvement of signage and striping was provided for each school site as appropriate. Additionally, necessary offsite signage and striping improvements have been implemented on City streets.

 Stakeholder Feedback: In addition to the programs above, staff evaluates and responds to traffic safety related concerns from many sources, including the general public, school district staff and based on collision data. Staff logged over 350 service requests in FY 2021-22 and issued 39 work orders for the installation of parking signs, red curb, and delineator rep lacement. All service requests are responded to by staff via phone call or email. When concerns can’t be resolved through education, staff will then conduct field investigations. The field investigations include observing driver behavior to substantiate the concerns of the stakeholder, collecting data such as speed or volume, and taking other field measurements. The service requests are discussed at weekly traffic staff team meetings to determine countermeasures and next steps. The resolution could include notifying the Police Department for enforcement, issuing work orders for traffic infrastructure maintenance or may result as a recommended project to be evaluated for prioritization of funding in one of the programs discussed above . Members of the publ ic are encouraged to submit traffic safety concerns through the City’s Report-It application.

II. Grant Programs Designed to Complete Safety Improvements  Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) : This federal grant program is offered approximately every two years. Projects are prioritized for funding based on collision reduction benefits that exceed the cost of improvements by a factor of at least 10:1. The City has secured funding through this program for several projects in recent years. The next grant cycle application is due in September 2022. City staff is preparing grant applications for 22 intersections prioritized in the LRSP for an estimated $4-million dollars in traffic safety improvements. 207
Item10.

 Safe Streets for All (SS4A): This is a new federal grant program established through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The SS4A program supports the U.S. Department of Transportation goal of zero deaths and serious injuries on the nation’s roadways. The program requires the adoption of an Action Plan to qualify for funding. The City has amended the LRSP to be consistent with the requirements of the SS4A Action Plan and will apply in September 2022 for $1.5 million dollars to fund the installation of a new traffic signal at the intersecti on of Centre City Parkway and Brotherton Road.

 Active Transportation Program (ATP) : The State grant program is offered approximately every three years and supports projects that encourage bicycling and walking by improving connectivity and safety. The City has secured funding through this program for several projects in recent years.

The City applied for ATP cycle six funding in June 2022 for sidewalk improvements along Citrus Avenue to improve access to Hidden Valley Middle School at a cost of $3-million.

III. Education and Enforcement Programs Designed to Improve Safety In addition to improving the built environment, traffic safety remains a police department priority. Traffic complaints and trending traffic issues are communicated to officers in dail y briefings to help focus enforcement in the areas where they are needed most. In 2021, the department rolled out an electronic citation system that streamlines how citations are issued and processed. Finally, grant funds provided by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) are used to provide necessary funding and staffing support to further the police department’s education and enforcement campaigns.  OTS STEP Grant : This grant funds a range of enforcement and education activities. Past grants have funded the purchase of a new DUI trailer, a new radar feedback/message trailer, preliminary alcohol screening devices (portable breathalyzers), and mobile printers for our electronic citation system. In addition, the grant fully funds one officer position that is dedicated to DUI enforcement. The FY2021-22 grant provided $520,000 and has been used to cover expenses for one DUI enforcement officer. The grant also funded DUI checkpoints, DUI Saturation Patrols, Distracted Driving enforcement, Primary Collision Fac tor (PCF) details, Motorcycle Enforcement details, “Know Your Limits” education campaigns, and c ollaborative details with other county agencies.

 OTS Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Educational Grant: This grant is targeted toward education for children and older adults. Activities include the purchase of pedestrian safety equipment (reflective bands and reflective zipper pulls), bicycle safety equipment (headlights, tail lights and helmets) and educational materials. In addition, this grant funds costs for officers to go into the community and give safety presentations, including bicycle rodeos, bicycle and pedestrian safety 208
Item10.

presentations at schools and community organizations, bicycle safety courses, participation in Safe Routes to School meetings, and pede strian safety presentations for older adults. The FY 2021-22 grant provided $25,000 that has funded enforcement details aimed at bicycle and pedestrian safety in addition to the previously discussed education campaigns.

 Safe Routes to School Education: The Juniper Elementary Safe Routes to Schools project includes an ATP grant funding component to conduct pedestrian safety and encouragement activities at three schools, including Juniper Elementary, Central Elementary , and Oak Hill Elementary.

COMPACT will conduct mobility assessment workshops, walk/bike audits, driving audits and prepare education programs for each school at the start of the school year in the fall . Student- led outreach and encouragement campaigns as well as education for motorists will be conducted at each site.

 Public Information Campaign: The Police Department issues press releases and social media posts on safe practices and crash prevention. The Police Department also conducts targeted enforcement, participates in safety fairs, and conduct s pedestrian and bicycle safety presentations with youth and seniors in the City. As committed to during the November 2021 workshop, the Escondido Police Department has developed a public information campaign designed to remind roadway users of the importance of safety.

The Escondido Police Department established the Go Slow in Esco campaign. In an effort to reduce traffic collisions and address concerns of traffic safety, the program was created to bring awareness to issues including speedin g, running red lights, and other traffic violations. The campaign features collaborative efforts from the police department, community members, and law enforcement partners to always practice safe driving in and around the community.

The Police Departme nt also fully participates in campaigns that bring high visibility and safe practices to the community, including:
 National Walk to School Day
 National Teen Driver Safety Week
 National Distracted Driver Awareness Month
 National Motorcycle Safety Month
 National Bicycle Safety Month
 National Click It or Ticket Mobilization
 National Child Passenger Safety Week
 California Pedestrian Safety Month
During the fall of 2022, school traffic safety will be the main focus of the public information campaign.
209
Item10.

The need to focus additional resources toward transportation safety was identified as a top City priority.

OTS compares safety statistics for 59 similar-sized cities. Since the November 2021 workshop, updated OTS data shows Escondido ranks 11th highest for fatal and injury crashes (improved from 8th), 13th highest for alcohol-involved crashes (improved from 8th), 33rd highest for pedestrian-involved crashes (improved from 11 th) and 16th highest for speed -related crashes (improved from 15 th). While these improving statistics are positive news, staff’s presentation will cover the need for continued vigilance and dedication of resources to combat nationwide trends of unsafe driver behavior. 210
Item10.

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY UPDATE
August 24, 2022
David Cramer, Chief of Police
Edd Alberto, City Traffic Engineer
211
Item10.

Overview
• Escondido’s Safety Statistics
• Improving Transportation Safety
• Programs
• Projects
• Education
• Enforcement
212
Item10.

Escondido’s Roadway System
• 315 centerline-miles of roadway
• State Route 78 – Maintained by Caltrans
• 170 Signalized Intersections
• Range of Roadway Types
o Rural and Residential Streets
o Collector Streets
o Prime Arterials
213
Item10.
214
Item10.

Escondido’s Rankings (2019 Data)
Compared to 59 similar sized Cities:
• 13th highest for Alcohol Involved Crashes (down from 8th in 2018) • 11th highest for Fatal and Injury Crashes (down from 9th in 2018) • 33rd highest for Pedestrian Involved Crashes (down from 11th in 2018) • 16th highest for Speed Related Crashes (down from 15th in 2018) • 50th in DUI Arrests (493 arrests)
ots.ca.gov
215
Item10.

Speed and Safety
• Speed Limits set based on 85th% speed as required by State Law • Speeding is the leading cause of fatal car collisions in US • Aggressive driving causes over 50% of collisions in US 216
Item10.
“Nearly 118 people died in U.S. traffic crashes every day last year, according to the agency’s figures. The Governors Highway Safety Association, a group of state traffic safety officials, blamed the increase on dangerous behavior such as speeding, driving while impaired by alcohol and drugs, and distracted driving, as well as “roads designed for speed instead of safety.”
Source: Associated Press. “Nearly 43,000 people died on US roads last year, agency says.” https://apnews.com/article/health-government-and-politics- pandemics-transportation-8388d8ca4b1ad141939fe07ce00f9c7f National Collision Trends
“During 2021 there was a 10.5% jump in fatalities nationwide, the largest increase since data collection begin in 1975.”
217
Item10.

National Collision Trends
• 2017-2020 national fatal collisions
were trending lower each quarter
over previous years
• First half of 2021 show 18.4%
increase in fatal collisions over
same period of 2020
• Research shows changes in driver
behavior
• Increase in risky behaviors
• Speeding
• Not wearing seatbelts
• Driving under the influence
NHTSA
218
Item10.

Escondido Collision Statistics 2016-2021
crashType
Broadside (32%)
Rear-End (26%)
Sideswipe (15%)
crashCause
Unsafe Speed (20%)
Auto ROW Violation
(19%)
DUI (17%)
crashSeverity
Property Damage Only
(29%)
Complaint of Pain (40%)
Visible Injury (28%)
Severe Injury (2%)
Fatal (1%)
219
Item10.

Escondido Collision Trends 2016-2021
500
600
700
800
900
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Total Crashes
Total Injury
4 8
12 16
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Fatal Crashes
220
Item10.

Escondido First Half 2021 vs 2022
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Total Crashes
Total Injury
2021
2022
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Fatal Crashes
221
Item10.

SD County Blood Alcohol Concentration Trends

0.173 0.174 0.175

0.182 0.184

0.189

0.170

0.180

0.190
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
• *2022 data for January through June
• San Diego County Sheriff’s Crime Lab tested 49 percent of all DUI arrestee samples • Tested samples included at least one additional drug; most commonly was THC • The significant shift in increased mean BAC coincides with the beginning of COVID in 2020.
*
222
Item10.

Traffic Management Toolbox
• Establishes framework on when and how to initiate traffic management
• Classifies tools into three groups
• Class I – Enforcement, Education, Speed Trailer, Signs, Red Curb • Class II – Radar Speed Signs, High Visibility Crosswalks, Lane Narrowing, Buffers • Class III – Pedestrian Signals, Medians Islands, Curb Extensions, Roundabouts Class I Class II Class III
223
Item10.

Traffic Management Project List (TMPL)
• Community nominates Safety Improvement Projects
• Transportation and Community Safety Commission selects nominated projects for funding
• Annual budget of $50,000
224
Item10.

Traffic Signal Priority Lists (TSPL)
• City monitors and maintains over 165 traffic signals
• Feedback from citizens, council members, and other departments • Two separate lists:
• New Traffic Signals
• Modification of Existing Signals (addition of left turn arrows) • Adopted scoring criteria
• Used as guidelines in recommending future projects for the Capital Improvement Budget and prioritize locations to seek grant funding • Last Adopted by the City Council in April 2021
225
Item10.

TSPL
Rank Study Intersection Status/Funding
New Signals
1 Rock Springs Road / Lincoln Ave Developer
2 Harding Street / Lincoln Ave TBD
3 Lomas Serenas Dr / Via Rancho Pkwy TBD
Signal Modifications - Add Left Turn Phasing
1 Bear Valley Pkwy / Mary Lane Construction*
2 Metcalf Street / Mission Ave TBD
3 Quince Street / Washington Ave HSIP Grant
4 Fig Street / East Valley Pkwy HSIP Grant
5 Rose Street / Washington Av In Design/HSIP Grant
6 Fig Street / Mission Avenue HSIP Grant
7 Centre City Pkwy / Ninth Ave HSIP Grant
8 Rock Springs Road / Mission Av HSIP Grant
9 Juniper Street / Felicita Ave Constructed
10 Escondido Boulevard /Grand Ave HSIP Grant
226
Item10.

Local Roadway Safety Plan
• Risk-based, data-driven, systemic approach to improving safety of Local Roadways
• Identifies highest priority locations for future safety improvements • Defines cost-effective improvement strategies and countermeasures for each identified location
• Required for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Safe Streets 4 All Program (SS4A) grant funding
227
Item10.

HSIP & SS4A
$3.7M HSIP funding for traffic safety
improvements at 22 intersections
$1.5M SS4A funding for new traffic signal at
Centre City Parkway and Brotherton Road
228
Item10.

Improving Safety for All Modes of Transportation
Input
Citizen Feedback
Quarterly meetings with PD,
COMPACT and Schools
Data Collection and
Evaluation
Collect Speed and Volume Data
Field Evaluation
PD Observation/Enforcement
Solutions
Crosswalks & Flashing Beacons
Countdown Timers
Accessible Pedestrian Signals
Striping & Signage
Traffic Calming Toolkit
Priority List
Traffic Management Projects List
(TMPL)
Traffic Signal Priority List (TSPL)
Grant Applications
Improvements
Budgeted in CIP
Projects Completed in Order of
Priority
Grant Funded Projects
Report It application
[email protected]
(760) 839-4595
229
Item10.

Service Requests
• FY 2021-22, Development Services Staff logged over 350 service requests
• 39 Work Orders were issued
• No Parking Signs
• Parking Signs
• Red Curb
• Delineator replacement
230
Item10.

Engineering Project Updates
• Traffic Signal Communications Grant
• Seven Creek Crossings
• Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bike Path Improvements • Prop 68 Creek Trail Expansion Project
• Citracado Extension Project
• Grand Avenue Vision Project
• 2021 Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance Projects
• Bear Valley Parkway at Mary Lane Traffic Signal Modification • Washington Avenue at Rose Street Traffic Signal Modification • Juniper Safe Routes to School Phase 2
231
Item10.

Grand Avenue Vision
Phase 1
232
Item10.

Grand Avenue Vision
Phase 1
233
Item10.

Education & Enforcement
• Escondido Police Department was awarded two grants for 2022-2023 • STEP grant funding of $485,000.
• Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant funding of $25,000. 234
Item10.

OTS Selective Traffic Enforcement (STEP) grant
• Currently in Quarter 4 of the 2021-22 grant that provides $520,000 to fund:
• DUI checkpoints
• DUI Saturation Patrols
• Distracted Driving enforcement
• Primary Collision Factor (PCF) details
• Motorcycle Enforcement details
• “Know Your Limits” education campaigns
• Collaborative details with other county agencies
235
Item10.
• Currently in Quarter 4 of the 2021-22 grant which provides $25,000 to fund:
• Education campaigns aimed at youth and senior pedestrian and bicycle safety
• Enforcement details aimed at bicycle and pedestrian safety.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant
236
Item10.

Traffic Enforcement
• Total Traffic Stops Per Year*
12,333
9,340 9,394
0 2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Traffic Stops
Total Traffic Stops Per Year
2019 2020 2021
Escondido is ranked 5th
out of 59 similar Cities for
DUI arrests
*The Coronavirus Pandemic caused an anomaly in the 2020 traffic enforcement efforts and traffic statistics. Due to government restrictions and lockdown protocol, there were less drivers on the road. For a portion of 2020, Police Department personnel were directed to maintain social distancing standards and were responding only to emergency calls for service. 237
Item10.

Traffic Enforcement
• Total Traffic Citations Issued Per Year*
7,415
4,175 4,549
0 1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Traffic Citations
Total Traffic Citations Issued Per Year
2019 2020 2021
*The Coronavirus Pandemic caused an anomaly in the 2020 traffic enforcement efforts and traffic statistics. Due to government restrictions and lockdown protocol, there were less drivers on the road. For a portion of 2020, Police Department personnel were directed to maintain social distancing standards and were responding only to emergency calls for service. 238
Item10.

Red Light Violator Detection Unit
239
Item10.

Education
• Walk Audits at 27 school sites
• In partnership with COMPACT, District staff and School Principal • Drop-off/Pick-up Management
• Walking and Biking Safety – Crossing Points
• Safe Routes to School Education – Juniper Elementary, Central Elementary and Oak Hill Elementary
• Led by COMPACT and funded with ATP Grant
• Walking, biking and driving audits
• Prepare Education Program
• Student-led outreach/encouragement
• Motorist Education
240
Item10.

Education & Enforcement
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety OTS Grant
• Bike Rodeos
• Safety Equipment
• Bicycle Safety Courses
• Presentations to Schools, Older Adults, and
Community Organizations
• Radar Speed Trailer
• GO SLOW IN ESCO!
241
Item10.

GO SLOW IN ESCO!
242
Item10.

Summary
243
Item10.

Join Us
244
Item10.

Escondido Report It!
Apple Store
Google Play
QUESTIONS?
245
Item10.

Back-Up Slides
246
Item10.

Rank Study Intersection Recommended Improvements Cost Estimate Funding
Status
Ranking for New Signals
1 Rock Springs Road / Lincoln Ave Signalization + 150 LF of sidewalk $ 454,000 Developer
Funded
2 Harding Street / Lincoln Ave Signalization $ 545,000
Pending
Funding
3 Lomas Serenas Dr / Via Rancho Pkwy Signalization $ 358,000 Pending
Funding
Ranking for Signal Modifications
1 Bear Valley Pkwy / Mary Lane Install left turn phasing on east and west approaches $ 355,000
Budgeted and
Under Design
2 Metcalf Street / Mission Ave Install Protected Permissive Left Turn phasing on all approaches (pilot) $ 500,000
Pending
Funding
3 Quince Street / Washington Ave
Install left turn phasing on all approaches $ 450,000
Pending
Funding
4 Fig Street / East Valley Pkwy
Install left turn phasing on all approaches $ 498,000
Pending
Funding
5 Rose Street / Washington Av Install left turn phasing on east and west approaches $ 427,000
Pending
Funding
6 Fig Street / Mission Avenue
Install left turn phasing on all approaches $ 450,000
Pending
Funding
7 Centre City Pkwy / Ninth Ave Install left turn phasing on east and west approaches $ 440,000
Pending
Funding
8 Rock Springs Road / Mission Av Install left turn phasing on north and south approaches $ 320,000
Developer
Funded
9 Juniper Street / Felicita Ave
Install left turn phasing on all approaches $ 445,000 Grant Funded 10 Escondido Boulevard /Grand Ave Install left turn phasing on east and west approaches $ 350,000
Pending
Funding
TOTAL COST ESTIMATE (New Signals & Left
Turn Phasing) $ 5,592,000 $4,018,000
Budget Year Funding
FY 22/23 $100,000
FY 23/24 $250,000
FY 24/25 $250,000
FY 25/26 $250,000
Signal Program Budget
Projections (TransNet):
247
Item10.
248
Item10.

Signal Technology
Current Reality:

Outdated Detection
Unreliable Communication
Signal Controllers Lack Functionality
Vision for Smart Signals:

Video Detection: Bikes, Peds, Conflict Monitoring
Broadband Communication: View/Adjust Signals
Remotely and Supports Connected Vehicles
Detection Failure Alerts
More Responsive Signal Controllers
249
Item10.

Signal Hardware & Communication Upgrades
Signal Hardware Upgrade Project
• Upgrade to SMART Signal Controller
Citywide
• Upgrade to City-Operated Broadband
Wireless Communication Citywide
• Install a Traffic Management Center
(TMC) to allow immediate response to
emergencies and severe congestion
• Optimize detection and coordination
along major roadways
• $1,160,850 from Highway Safety
Improvement Program with 50% City
match
250
Item10.

TSPL –Ranking Criteria for Traffic Signal
Modifications for Protected Left-turns
• Criteria 1 (Volumes 50%) Sum of
the critical left turn and
opposing through volumes.
• Criteria 2 (Crashes 25%) left turn
crash rate
• Criteria 3 (Speeds 25%) based on
the highest 85th percentile
speed
• Left-turn Warrants using
Highway Capacity Manual 6
Methodology
251
Item10.

Timing for Implementation
• Cost of Each Location is $350,000 - $500,000
• Projected revenues allow balance of funding for one location in FY21/23:
• Recommend move forward with Bear Valley/Mary Lane signal modification • Highest ranked new signal (Rock Springs/Lincoln) is a condition of project development
• CIP Budget to be considered by the City Council on May 12th and June 9th • Second ranked signal (Lincoln/Harding) and signal modification (Metcalf/Mission) could be funded in FY23/24 and 25/26, respectively 252
Item10.

New Traffic Signals - Signal Warrant Analysis
253
Item10.

Ranking of New Traffic Signals – Accident Data
• Criteria 6: Accident History
• 5-year accident data (01/2014 – 01/2019)
• Average of the latest two years used to determine points • Points assigned for accidents that could have been corrected with the installation of a new Traffic Signal AND only if less restrictive measures (warning signage, lighting, painted markings) have failed.
254
Item10.

Level Of Service Summary without and with Left
Turn Phasing Recommendations
The trade off in installing left turn
phasing is the Level of Service of
the intersection drops
The decrease in level of service in
adding a left turn phase versus the
frequency of left turn related crashes
does not warrant the installation of a
left turn phase at Ash Street/Lincoln
Boulevard. Therefore, left turn
phasing is not recommended at Ash
Street/Lincoln Avenue and was not
included in the ranking system, due to
the intersection not meeting
warrants, Level of Service operation
beyond acceptable levels, causing
higher delay and possibly future
widening. 255
Item10.

Protected Permitted Left Turn Phasing, PPLT
• Phasing:
• Left Turns are protected with green
arrow for specified time-frame
• Yellow arrow then denotes when left
turns are allowed when there is no
conflicting traffic
• Metcalf St / Mission Ave
recommended for PPLT (of top 3)
• Other locations have high
pedestrian traffic where PPLT is not
recommended
• Not widely used in Northern SD.
12 month Pilot recommended by
TCSC
256
Item10.

Protected Permitted Left Turn Phasing, PPLT
• Not widely used in Northern San
Diego County
• Phasing:
• Left Turns are protected with green
arrow for specified time-frame
• Yellow arrow then denotes when left
turns are allowed when there is no
conflicting traffic
• Metcalf St / Mission Ave
recommended for PPLT (of top 3)
• Other locations have high pedestrian
traffic where PPLT is not
recommended
• If implemented, 12 month Pilot
recommended by TCSC
257
Item10.

TSPL –Ranking Criteria for Traffic Signal
Modifications for Protected Left-turns
• Criteria 1 (Volumes 50%) For the
proposed LTP Phasing - the sum of the
critical left turn and opposing through
volumes during the AM and PM peak
hour.
• Criteria 2 (Crashes 25%) left turn crash
rate which is equal to the left turn
related crashes (January 2014 to
January 2019) divided by AM and PM
Peak-Hour left-turn volume.
• Criteria 3 (Speeds 25%) based on the
highest 85th percentile speed
recorded for each approach of the
intersection.
• Left-turn Warrants using Highway
Capacity Manual 6 Methodology
258
Item10.

TSPS– Warrants and COE Ranking Criteria for
New Traffic Signals
• Based on Traffic Policy #11,
adopted in April 1991
• CA MUTCD Warrants need to be
met
259
Item10.

Analysis Type Key Finding
Crash Type
 Top 3 crash types: Broadside (34%), Rear-End (27%), and Sideswipe (11%).  1,487 Broadside crashes throughout the City.
 1,146 Rear-End crashes.
 488 Sideswipe crashes.

Crash Cause
 Most common cause was Unsafe Speed (20%), followed by Auto Right-of-Way Violation (19%) and DUI (17%).  DUI crashes were reported throughout.
 Pedestrian violations, such as peds crossing mid-block, jaywalking or crossing outside a marked crosswalk were primary cause of pedestrian-involved crashes,
 Bicycle-involved crashes were primarily auto right-of-way violations.

Crash Severity
 Severe injuries reported in 2% of crashes
 Fatalities were reported in 1% of crashes.
 Fatalities involving motor vehicles generally occurred throughout the roadway network.

Time of Day Analysis
 3 PM to 6 PM experienced greatest number of crashes with 970.  113 of pedestrian and bicycle-involved crashes occur from 3 PM to 6PM.  3 PM to 6 PM, 41% of pedestrian-involved crashes are caused by pedestrian violations such as crossing mid- block, jaywalking or crossing outside a marked crosswalk.  33% of bicycle-involved crashes during this 3-hour time period is caused by bicyclists riding on the wrong side of the road.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes
 251 pedestrian crashes were reported, 10 of which were fatal crashes and 25 of which resulted in severe injury
 191 bicycle crashes were reported that resulted in 2 fatalities and an additional 183 injury crashes  The majority of pedestrian- or bicyclist crashes involved ages of 15 and 64 years old.  The majority of reported pedestrian- or bicyclist crashes occurred on roadways with a speed limit of 35 MPH.

Summary
of Key
Findings
260
Item10.
261
Item10.
262
Item10.
263
Item10.
264
Item10.

FY21/22 Budget: Top Priority Transportation Safety
Improve
Enforcement
& Education
Maintain

IMPROVE
• City Traffic
Engineer
FY21/22
budget
• Local Roadway
Safety Plan
• Signal
Upgrades
• Traffic
Management
Center
• Comp. Active
Transportation
Strategy

ENFORCE & EDUCATE
• Two Traffic
Safety Officers
FY 21/22
budget
• Education
campaigns
• Checkpoints
• Saturation
Patrols
• Speed trailer
deployment
• Targeted
enforcement

MAINTAIN
• Electrician
FY21/22
budget
• Respond to
Signal Alerts
• Maintain
detection
cameras
• Replace failing
equipment
265
Item10.

Red Light Enforcement
• Red Light Photo Enforcement in use 2004-2013
• Tickets were regularly challenged and “thrown out” in traffic court • Resulted in sudden breaking of vehicles at photo enforced locations • Annual red light collisions ranged from 100% decrease to 60% increase at photo enforced locations (-100%, -73%, +20%, +60%)
• Program costs outweighed benefits (FY11/12 cost of $196,000) • Proposed Approach
• Red light indicators: allows officers to see signal turning red while in a position to enforce
• Officer presence encourages safe driving at the intersection and beyond • Currently Lack Capability for Photo Enforcement
• Cameras are set up to detect only and do not store data or take photographs • Many intersections use loop detection and are not served by cameras • Signal communication lacks bandwidth to transmit photographs or video feeds 266
Item10.

Completed/Funded Improvements
Signal Priority List
• Valley/Date*
• El Norte/Fig*
• Ash/Sheridan
• Broadway/Lincoln
• Escondido/
Felicita signal
mod (design)
Traffic Management
Priority List
• 14 Projects
• 11 Crosswalk
Upgrades
• 13 Intersection
Countdown Timers
• 6 Audible
Pedestrian Signals
• 2 Traffic Calming
Safety-Related Grants
• Missing Link*
• El Norte Pedestrian Signal*
• 7 Creek Trail Crossings*
• Juniper SR2S* (design)
• Tulip/Quince Ped Signals*
(design)
• Traffic Signal Technology
Upgrades* (design)
* Grant Funded Projects
267
Item10.

Road to Zero
Road to Zero Coalition
• Managed by the National Safety Council (NSC) and supported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), • Multiple strategies intended to end traffic-related fatalities in the US by 2050.
• Accelerate the achievement of that vision through concurrent efforts that focus on overall system design, addressing infrastructure design, vehicle technology, enforcement and driver behavior.
• “Three Lanes” that lead to Zero Roadway deaths
268
Item10.

National HighwayTraffic Safety Administration
269
Item10.

Education & Enforcement
• FY 2021-22 OTS STEP Grant allocation provides funding for:
• 1 Full-time DUI Traffic Enforcement Officer
• 6 DUI Checkpoints
• 19 Saturation Patrols
• 6 Traffic Enforcement Details
• 4 Distracted Driving Details
• 1 Motorcycle Safety Detail
• 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement Details
• Driver Safety Presentations
• Know Your Limit Campaign
• Traffic Safety Equipment
270
Item10.

KEY-

CONSENT CALENDAR CURRENT BUSINESS

PUBLIC HEARING WORKSHOP
9/14/2022
CONSENT CALENDAR - (A. FIRESTINE) - CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR GRAND VISION PLAN PHASE II - It is requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-122 authorizing the Mayor to execute a consultant services agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates for design of the Grand Avenue Vision Plan Phase II Project
CONSENT CALENDAR- (A. FIRESTINE) - AWARD OF THE KIT CARSON PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT - It is requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-121 authorizing the Mayor to execute a Public Improvement Agreement with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for the Kit Carson Parking Lot Lighting Project.

CURRENT BUSINESS - (Z. BECK) - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE -Request the City Council receive and file an update from the Boards and Commissions Subcommittee.

CURRENT BUSINESS - (C. MARTINEZ) - CONSIDERATION OF BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE CREATION CURRENT BUSINESS (Z. BECK) - APPOINTMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Page 1 ends

271
Item11.

← All documents from this meeting