Agenda packet — Escondido City Council, June 10, 2026 (part 7 of 10)

1407
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -39- City of Escondido, California Table 4
Typical Maximum Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Equipment Onsite
Typical Maximum
Level (dBA) 50
Feet from the
Source
Typical Maximum
Level (dBA) 100 Feet
from the Source
Usage Factor
Concrete Mixer 79 73 40%
Loader 79 73 40%
Bulldozer 82 76 40%
Jack Hammer 89 83 20%
Pavement Roller 80 74 20%
Street Sweeper 82 76 10%
Man Lift 75 69 20%
Dump Truck 77 71 40%
Mobile Crane 81 75 16%
Excavator/Scraper 84 78 40%
Source: FTA Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018), Table 7-1.

Noise levels are based on actual maximum measured noise levels at 50 feet (Lmax).

Noise levels are based on a noise attenuation associated with the usage factor.

Operational Noise
Exterior Traffic Noise. Traffic is the primary noise source that would be generated by operation of the proposed project. As stated, existing noise levels were measured along the northern site boundary on April 25, 2025. The measured Leq during the 15-minute monitoring period was 62.9 dBA Leq, or approximately 63.9 dBA CNEL. Ambient conditions are less than 65 dBA; the normally compatible noise level for residences referenced in the General Plan Community Protection Element policy for exterior noise exposure to transportation related noise at residences and other sensitive properties. A doubling or halving of sound energy is required for the human ear to perceive an increase in noise levels. A change of 3 dBA is associated with the doubling or halving of sound energy; thus, the project would need to double existing volumes on Hamilton Lane and Bernardo Avenue to create a significant traffic noise impact. During monitoring, a total of 55 cars/light trucks passed the monitoring site on Bernardo Avenue and 59 cars/light trucks passed the site on Hamilton Lane. Peak hour volumes would be approximately 220 vehicles on Bernardo Avenue and 236 vehicles on Hamilton Lane. The project would add approximately 0.5 trips per hour which when added to peak hour traffic would have no noticeable effect on noise levels. Operational impacts would be less than significant. This would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Temporary Vibration Impacts
Less than significant. The vibration velocity level for perception by humans is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. As stated, the California Department of Transportation uses the following standards when addressing vibration. Excessive ground-borne vibration would occur if construction-related ground-borne vibration exceeds the “severe” vibration annoyance potential criteria for human receptors of 0.4 inch per second PPV or the damage potential criteria to older residential structures of 0.3 inch per second PPV for continuous/frequent intermittent construction sources, as specified by Caltrans (April 2020) The PPV and accompanying VdB level associated with common construction equipment is shown in Table 5. Based on the project geotechnical study and information from the applicant, heavy impact construction methods that could generate enough vibration to damage buildings proximal to the project site (i.e., pile driving, rock breaking, drilling, blasting) would not be required for the project.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 39 of 465 ends

1408
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -40- City of Escondido, California Construction activity on the project site would be temporary and vibration events would be transitory occuring only during equipment pass bys. Using vibration levels associated with a large bulldozer, the piece of grading equipment with the highest vibration level, as a worst-case scenario, groundborne vibration would be approximately 0.089 PPV at 25 feet (see Table 5 below). Similarly, if a hoe ram were required to break rocks during grading, a similar PPV would be expected. The PPV generated by a heavy bulldozer or hoe ram at 25 feet are below the vibration thresholds of significance referenced above.

Table 5
Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity
(inches/second) at 25 feet
Approximate Vibration Level
LV (dVB) at 25 feet
Pile driver (impact) 1.518 (upper range) 112

0.644 (typical) 104
Pile driver (sonic) 0.734 upper range 105

0.170 typical 93
Clam shovel drop (slurry wall) 0.202 94
Hydromill (slurry wall - soil) 0.008 in soil 66
Hydromill (slurry wall - rock 0.017 in rock 75
Vibratory Roller 0.21 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson drill 0.089 87
Loaded trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018.

Operational Impacts. The proposed project is a residential development. It would not generate vibration postconstruction. No operational vibration impacts would occur. This issue was not discussed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, as stated, vibration during construction and operation would be less than significant. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The proposed project is located approximately 10.7 miles southeast of McClellen-Palomar Airport.

Per Exhibit III-1 of the McClellen-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), the project site is located outside the 60 dB CNEL noise contour. No impact would occur. This issue was not discussed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, as stated no impact would occur under this threshold.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 40 of 465 ends

1409
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -41- City of Escondido, California Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact

14.14 POPULATION & HOUSING. Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 2007 Initial Study
Population within the City would incrementally increase as a result of developing the proposed five residential lots. The City's General Plan anticipates single-family residential use on the project site and the density of the proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of Estate I. The proposed development would incrementally contribute to the City's Regional Share Housing requirements. The development of the site would not be considered growth-inducing since the project site is located within an established community. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant population and housing impact.

Proposed Project
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would construct five new single-family residences and one stormwater detention basin. As stated, the number of housing units in the City was projected to be 54,910 in 2025 and 58,990 in 2035, or an increase in 4,080 housing units. Furthermore, the City’s population was projected to be 165,127 residents in 2025 and 169,122 residents in 2035, or an increase of 3,995 residents over the period. The average household size is 2.8 people per dwelling unit, which translates into approximately 14 residents for the proposed project. The proposed number of units would be within the total projected for the City of Escondido by 2035. Further, because the project is consistent with the zoning and General Plan designation, the project would not induce substantial population growth. A less than significant impact would occur. This is consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The proposed project would not require the removal existing housing, and therefore, would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur. This issue was not discussed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, no impact would occur under this threshold.

Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Initial Study. The project would not result in any new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Initial Study result. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 41 of 465 ends

1410
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -42- City of Escondido, California Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact

14.15 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire Protection?
Police Protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
2007 Initial Study
Fire - The City Fire Department has indicated their ability to adequately serve the proposed project. One additional fire hydrant and a fire tum-around are to be located within the project is part of the proposal.

Law Enforcement -The City's Police Department currently serves the area and can easily included the property within a patrol beat. The Department has not expressed concerns regarding its ability to serve the site.

Schools - The site is within the Escondido Union School District and the Escondido Union High School District. Students would likely attend the new Bernardo Elementary School, Bear Valley Middle School, and San Pasqual High School. ꞏThe incremental impact of the proposed residential developments on the school system would be offset by the impact fees collected upon issuance of building permits.

Proposed Project
1) Fire protection?
Less than significant. The Escondido Fire Department provides fire and emergency medical services to the City of Escondido. Fire Station 5 is the nearest station to the project site. It is located at 2319 Felicita Road approximately 800 feet northeast of the site. Given the nature of the project, demand for fire and emergency service may increase over existing conditions. The project is consistent with the land use designation for the site and would not increase the population beyond what was anticipated in the Escondido General Plan.

Further, the project would be designed and constructed consistent with applicable codes and standards for access and fire suppression infrastructure. The payment of impact fees would fund any necessary improvements to the Escondido Fire Department infrastructure to maintain or improve the efficiency of department operations. The project would not require the construction of a new fire station to maintain service ratios within the service area served by Fire Station 5. Impacts would be less than significant. This determination would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 42 of 465 ends

1411
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -43- City of Escondido, California 2) Police protection?
Less than significant. The Escondido Police Department provides law enforcement services to the City of Escondido. The headquarters is located at 1163 North Centre City Parkway approximately 3.2 miles north of the site. Given the nature of the project, demand for law enforcement services may increase over existing conditions. The project is consistent with the land use designation for the site and would not increase the population beyond what was anticipated in the Escondido General Plan. The payment of impact fees would fund any necessary improvements to the Escondido Police Department infrastructure to maintain or improve the efficiency of department operations. The project would not require the construction of a new police station to maintain service ratios within the service area. Impacts would be less than significant. This determination would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.
3) Schools?
Less than significant. The nearest school to the project site is Bernardo Elementary School located at 1222 Mountain Heights Drive approximately 0.23 miles south of the site. The proposed project would likely provide housing for school-aged children; thus, affecting demand for school services. The applicant would be required to pay a developer fee of $4.46 per square foot (or current rate at the time of assessment) of assessable residential space to support ongoing development of school facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.

This determination would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. 4) Parks?
Less than significant. Felicita County Park is the most directly accessible park from the project site. It is located approximately 0.3 miles south of the project site along the east side of Park Drive. The increase in population living in the area is not expected to impact demand for park facilities. The project would not remove park or recreational facilities that would require replacement elsewhere. This issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, as stated, impacts would be less than significant. 5) Other public facilities?
Less than significant. Other public facilities include streets, libraries, senior centers, community centers, and pools, all of which are intended to serve the general public. No impacts to other public facilities are anticipated to occur with the construction and operation of the proposed project. This issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, as stated, impacts would be less than significant.

14.16 RECREATION. Would the project:
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 43 of 465 ends

1412
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -44- City of Escondido, California 2007 Initial Study
Development of the area would result in an incremental demand on the City's recreational facilities. However, the development fees paid by this project would offset the anticipated impact on the existing facilities. The proposed project would not affect existing recreational opportunities since the site is not used for recreational activities; consequently no significant impact to recreational resources would occur as a result of the project.

Proposed Project
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project will not affect any existing park facilities nor increase the demand for additional recreational facilities to the extent that it would result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. No impact would occur. This is consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. a) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. No additional recreational facilities that could potentially result in an adverse impact on the environment would be constructed. No impact would occur. This is consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.

14.17 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a. Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
2007 Initial Study
The project's private street (36' R-O-W) serving four of the proposed lots would connect with Hamilton Lane at a point nearly 300 feet east of the existing intersection of Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane and directly across from the existing intersection of Hamilton Lane and Rancho Diego Court. Hamilton Lane is currently a Local Collector (63' R-O-W). Traffic from the newly proposed private street would either continue west or eastbound on Hamilton Lane. The fifth proposed lot would have access via a proposed driveway connected to Bernardo Avenue approximately 60 feet south of the intersection of Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane.

The project will potentially add traffic to the existing intersection of Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 44 of 465 ends

1413
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -45- City of Escondido, California (County). Based on San Diego Association of Governments' (SANDAG) traffic generation rates for the San Diego region, the proposed subdivision would generate approximately 12 trips per dwelling unit, or approximately 60 new ADTs. The City's Engineering Department indicated that the increase of 60 additional trips onto this segment of Hamilton Lane will not significantly impact the existing Levels of Service on the adjacent streets and intersections. Stable traffic flow is maintained along the segment and ability to maneuver within the vicinity of the project and along the Hamilton Lane segment is not significantly restricted. The City's Engineering Department further indicated the proposed project is not anticipated to have any significant individual or cumulative impacts to the circulation system or degrade the LOS (Levels of Service) on any of the adjacent roadways or intersections.

Proposed Project
Information in this section is summarized from the Scoping Agreement for Transportation Studies, prepared by Mizuta Traffic Consulting, Inc., March 2025 and provided as Appendix G. a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
No Impact. The project would provide five new single-family residences and one stormwater basin. The project would generate approximately 80 daily trips. The project would not require any improvements to either Bernardo Avenue or Hamilton Lane. There is no existing transit proximal to the site; thus, transit would not be affected by the project. The project would provide curb/gutter/sidewalk frontage improvements which would address existing pedestrian deficiencies in the project area. No bicycle lanes are currently provided; thus, none would be affected by the project. The project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, no impact would occur under this threshold. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less than Significant Impact. As stated, the project would generate 80 new daily vehicle trips. The Scoping Agreement for Transportation Studies states that the project would screen out of the need to provide a complete Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis because it does not exceed 200 daily trips. The project would not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). A less than significant impact would occur. This is consistent with the impact determination in the 2007 Initial Study. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The project would provide five new residences and a stormwater basin. The project would not modify the existing transportation system or introduce incompatible uses. This issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, no impact would occur under this threshold. e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. While the project would increase traffic by 80 daily trips, it would not adversely impact emergency access by providing inadequate site access or otherwise impacting use of local streets by emergency vehicles.

This issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study; however, no impact would occur under this threshold.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 45 of 465 ends

1414
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -46- City of Escondido, California Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact

14.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. 2007 Initial Study
An evaluation of tribal cultural resource impacts per AB 52 was not required under Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines when the 2007 Initial Study was prepared.

Proposed Project
i)) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? No impact. As stated in Section 14.5, Cultural Resources; the SCIC records search identified three cultural resources studies (SD-8588, -8596, and -10211) that were conducted within the project site and an additional 42 studies within a 0.5-mile radius. None identified any historic resources on-site that are listed or eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR. Further, no historic resources were identified. No impact to historic resources would occur.
ii) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 (In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe)? Less than Significant. As stated in Section 4.15, no Tribal Cultural Resources were identified within the project site through Native American scoping. However, the Native American scoping identified the project Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 46 of 465 ends

1415
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -47- City of Escondido, California vicinity as highly sensitive for prehistoric/Native American resources. This sensitivity is supported by the five previously recorded resources with prehistoric components within 0.5-mile of the project site, including the CRHR/NRHP-listed multicomponent site P-37-000570 within Felicita Park, which contains a large prehistoric habitation component.

Given the presence of a previously recorded archaeological site within the project site and evidence of archaeological sensitivity indicated by the records search results and responses from tribal contacts, archaeological and Native American monitoring of all project-related earth disturbing activities is recommended as a Condition of Approval (CUL-1) for addressing any discoveries of cultural resources. The discovery of human remains would be addressed by complying with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. With implementation of existing regulations addressing the discovery of human remains, impacts to cultural resources would be less than significant.

As stated, this topical issue was not addressed in the 2007 Initial Study. However, based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the project would result in any significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources.

Potentially
Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact

14.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste is excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructures, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
2007 Initial Study
Sewer Service. There currently exists a public sewer line in City streets immediately off-site that would accommodate the site's needs. City Public Utilities staff has confirmed that adequate treatment capacity exists to serve the project site.

Water Service. The site is within the Rincon Water District's Improvement District #1. Currently, adequate water delivery is available from water lines in adjacent streets.

Storm Water/Refuse Collection. The proposed project is required to comply with latest National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, City of Escondido's post-construction storm water treatment measures, and meet all City of Escondido Storm Water Management Standards thereafter to meet state and federal requirements.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 47 of 465 ends

1416
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -48- City of Escondido, California Escondido Disposal currently provides solid waste service to the area and the project would not result in a significant increase in solid waste. The proposal would not result in any individual or cumulative impacts to utilities and service systems.

Streets. The annexation will include the portion of Bernardo Avenue west of the project, the portion of Hamilton Lane north of the project (to the centerline plus ten feet) and the intersection of Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane. Road maintenance responsibilities will fall either on the City or the County and it is anticipated that no significant impacts to services will result.

Proposed Project
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded, water or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact. The project would connect to existing water/sewer and telecommunication infrastructure located adjacent to the site. No utility extensions, other than what is required to connect the project to adjacent offsite infrastructure would be required. The project would not require the expansion of existing water, wastewater or other utility systems, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.

No impact would occur. This would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less than Significant. The project site is located within the City of Escondido Water Department service area. The City owns, operates, and maintains approximately 44 miles of pipeline, 11 reservoirs, five pump stations, and two dams (and associated lakes). These resources are used to provide potable water to approximately 27,170 metered potable connections. As reported in the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the supply reliability assessment considered factors that could limit the expected quantity of current and projected water sources through 2045. The City’s water service reliability assessment and Drought Risk Assessment results indicate that no water shortages are anticipated within the next 25 years under normal, single-dry, and multiple dry years conditions.

The proposed project would have an annual water demand of approximately 996,273 gallons (both indoor use and outdoor irrigation demand) or 3.05-acre feet. As stated, the project would be consistent with zoning; thus, water demand has been incorporated into demand projections. No new or expanded entitlements would be required with implementation of the proposed project. Water supply impacts would be less than significant.

This would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
No Impact. As stated in threshold a, the project would connect to existing sewer infrastructure located adjacent to the site. The City owns and operates the Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility (HARRF), which has a design flow capacity of 18 million gallons per day (MGD) and the capacity to handle instantaneous flows of up to 36 MGD. Assuming sewer demand is 60 percent of indoor water demand (462 gallons daily), the daily sewer demand would be 277 gallons per day which is well within the daily treatment capacity of the HARRF. No new or expanded entitlements for wastewater treatment would be required with implementation of the proposed project. No impact would occur. This would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.
d) Generate solid waste is excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 48 of 465 ends

1417
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -49- City of Escondido, California infrastructures, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? No Impact. The City contracts solid waste collection services with Escondido Disposal. Waste is disposed at the Miramar Landfill in the City of San Diego. The Miramar Landfill is permitted to accept up to a maximum of 2,250 tons of waste per day. According to CalEEMod 2022.1 projections, the daily project demand would be 18 pounds or 3.32 tons annually. Project operation would not generate solid waste; and thus, would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. No impact would occur. This would be consistent with the 2007 Initial Study.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact. The proposed project would be subject to the City’s Solid Waste and Recycling Code (Chapter 14 of the City’s Municipal Code and 2022 Calgreen section 5.408) which will require that construction debris be recycled. The project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. No impact would occur. This issue was not discussed in the 2007 Initial Study; no impact would occur under this threshold.

14.20 WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildlife risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildlife or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
2007 Initial Study
This issue was not discussed in the 2007 Initial Study. As stated in Section 14.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the area will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildfires since the site is in a suburban setting and once developed much of the property surrounding structures will be irrigated.

Proposed Project
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 49 of 465 ends

1418
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -50- City of Escondido, California a-d) No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area in southern Escondido and within a Local Responsibility Area under the jurisdiction of the Escondido Fire Department. There are no wildlands located on or within proximity of the project site. No wildland fires would occur in the project area; thus, thresholds a-d would not be applicable. No impact would occur. This is consistent with the 2007 Initial Study determination.

6. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM COMPLIANCE As stated above, the following mitigation measures were identified and incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as part of the 2007 Initial Study. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable measures. The follow summarizes the mitigation measures and applicability to the proposed project.

Air Quality
2007 Initial Study Mitigation. Prior to construction and issuance of grading and building permits, a sitespecific analysis shall be prepared to determine equipment and methods necessary to protect adjacent properties.

Proposed Project. A project-specific air quality analysis was prepared for the project and provided as part of the discussion in Section 14.3, Air Quality. The proposed project would have no adverse effect on air quality.

This mitigation measure has been satisfied.

Biological Resources
2007 Initial Study Mitigation. To address direct impacts to non-native grasslands and coastal sage scrub, the proposed mitigation ratio is 0.25:1 through the purchase of habitat credits from an approved mitigation bank for non-native grassland. For impacts to 0.02 acres of coastal sage scrub, U.S. Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Game approval would be required.

Proposed Project. No non-native grassland or coastal sage scrub vegetation was reported in the Biological Resources Memorandum prepared by Tierra Data, Inc., July 2024. These habitat types no longer occur on the site. However, as stated, mitigation from the 2007 Initial Study pertaining to non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub remains applicable and would be enforced at the City’s discretion. 2007 Initial Study Mitigation. Impacts to native Live Oaks trees will be mitigated by relocating the four Live Oaks on-site and planting four new Live Oak trees on-site.

Proposed Project. As stated, multiple trees would be removed; however, the Project would be in compliance with City’s Municipal Code requirements for trees. Regardless, for each Live Oak tree removed, the tree would be replaced on-site and one additional tree would be planted on-site as so stated in the 2007 Initial Study.
2007 Initial Study Mitigation. A qualified biologist must inspect trees for nests prior to any brushing, grading, tree relocation or construction within close proximity to, or within the existing Oaks discussed in the Biological Report's addendum of 2/14/07. If any active nests of sensitive species are found, no impacts will be allowed until all younq have fledqed.

Proposed Project. As stated, multiple trees would be removed to accommodate the proposed project. A preconstruction nesting survey would be required consistent with the 2007 Initial Study. 2007 Initial Study Mitigation. The applicant shall provide funding to the satisfaction of the City for the fiveResolution No. 2026-90 Exhibit "C"

Page 50 of 465 ends

1419
Item8.

Initial Study Addendum -51- City of Escondido, California year monitoring of the oak trees with sufficient reserve for the replacement of any dead/dying stock.

Proposed Project. The proposed project would replace Live Oak trees removed during construction at a 1:1 ratio on-site and plant one additional Live Oak tree as mitigation for impacts to Live Oak tree impacts.

Hazardous Materials
2007 Initial Study Mitigation. Monitoring well MW57 is to remain onsite and be accessible to the Chatham Brothers RP Group for monitoring purposes until officially released. Upon release, it is to be removed per Regional Board and City of Escondido standards. Alternately, if a new replacement well is installed nearby and approved by the Regional Board and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), existing well MW57 can also then be released and removed per Regional Board and City of Escondido standards.

Proposed Project. Monitoring Well MW57 has been removed from the site as documented in the May 21, 2009, letter provided by the Chatham Site PRP Group. This mitigation measure has been satisfied.

Hydrology/Water Quality
2007 Initial Study Mitigation. No drinking water wells are to be drilled on-site and no excavations shall be allowed on-site without proper permits.

Proposed Project. Potable water would be provided by the City of Escondido Water Department. No wells would be drilled on-site. This mitigation measure is no longer applicable.

7. SPECIFIC MMRP ISSUE AREA CONDITIONS/REQUIREMENTS
The project applicant would be required to implement mitigation measures from the 2007 Initial Study that pertain to site conditions and project impacts as defined herein, as well as, current Conditions of Approval that apply to the proposed project. No new significant or adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation were identified for the proposed project. Implementation of Condition of Approval CUL-1 at the City’s discretion, would address Native American monitoring recommendations during grading and ground disturbance activities.

8. SIGNIFICANT UNMITIGATED IMPACTS
No significant unmitigated impacts were identified in the 2007 Initial Study or the proposed project. The proposed project would not result in any additional significant impacts nor would it result in an increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the previously adopted 2007 Initial Study.

9. CERTIFICATION
Copies of the addendum, the 2007 Initial Study and Addendum, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and associated project-specific technical appendices, may be reviewed by appointment in the City of Escondido Planning Department office.

Melissa DiMarzo, Assistant Planner II
Date
Melissa DiMarzo
4/21/26
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 51 of 465 ends

1420
Item8.

Appendix A – California Emission Estimator
Model Output File
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 52 of 465 ends

1421
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
1 / 75
Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report
Table of Contents1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information1.2. Land Use Types1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated3.2. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated3.3. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 53 of 465 ends

1422
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
2 / 75

3.4. Site Preparation (2026) - Mitigated3.5. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated3.6. Grading (2026) - Mitigated3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated3.10. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated3.12. Paving (2027) - Mitigated3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated3.14. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 54 of 465 ends

1423
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
3 / 75

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 55 of 465 ends

1424
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
4 / 75

4.8.1. Unmitigated4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 56 of 465 ends

1425
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
5 / 75

5.3.1. Unmitigated5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 57 of 465 ends

1426
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
6 / 75

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 58 of 465 ends

1427
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
7 / 75

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 59 of 465 ends

1428
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
8 / 75

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores7.4. Health & Equity Measures7.5. Evaluation Scorecard7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 60 of 465 ends

1429
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
9 / 75

1. Basic Project Information1.1. Basic Project Information Data Field ValueProject Name Hamilton Lane EscondidoConstruction Start Date 3/2/2026Operational Year 2026Lead Agency —Land Use Scale Project/siteAnalysis Level for Defaults CountyWindspeed (m/s) 2.20Precipitation (days) 26.6Location 33.089247938234934, -117.08811878755569County San DiegoCity EscondidoAir District San Diego County APCDAir Basin San DiegoTAZ 6294EDFZ 12Electric Utility San Diego Gas & ElectricGas Utility San Diego Gas & ElectricApp Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special LandscapeArea (sq ft)
Population Description
Single FamilyHousing

5.00 Dwelling Unit 1.62 9,750 58,564 — 14.0 —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 61 of 465 ends

1430
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
10 / 75

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure TitleConstruction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle IdlingWater W-7 Adopt a Water Conservation Strategy * Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.2. Emissions Summary2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against ThresholdsCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Unmit. 1.46 12.9 14.5 0.02 0.58 2.85 3.43 0.53 1.36 1.89 — 2,548 2,548 0.10 0.02 0.33 2,558Mit. 1.46 12.9 14.5 0.02 0.58 2.85 3.43 0.53 1.36 1.89 — 2,548 2,548 0.10 0.02 0.33 2,558%Reduced —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 6.22 13.0 15.1 0.02 0.51 2.51 3.01 0.47 1.19 1.65 — 2,604 2,604 0.11 0.02 0.01 2,614Mit. 6.22 13.0 15.1 0.02 0.51 2.51 3.01 0.47 1.19 1.65 — 2,604 2,604 0.11 0.02 0.01 2,614%Reduced —————————————————
AverageDaily(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 0.64 5.40 6.29 0.01 0.19 0.06 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.20 — 1,138 1,138 0.05 0.01 0.03 1,143Mit. 0.64 5.40 6.29 0.01 0.19 0.06 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.20 — 1,138 1,138 0.05 0.01 0.03 1,143 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 62 of 465 ends

1431
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
11 / 75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — %
Reduced
Annual(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 0.12 0.99 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 — 188 188 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 189Mit. 0.12 0.99 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 — 188 188 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 189%Reduced —————————————————

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily -Summer(Max) —————————————————
2026 1.46 12.9 14.5 0.02 0.58 2.85 3.43 0.53 1.36 1.89 — 2,548 2,548 0.10 0.02 0.33 2,558Daily -Winter(Max) —————————————————
2026 1.44 13.0 15.1 0.02 0.51 2.51 3.01 0.47 1.19 1.65 — 2,604 2,604 0.11 0.02 0.01 2,6142027 6.22 8.28 9.98 0.02 0.26 0.11 0.28 0.24 0.02 0.25 — 1,829 1,829 0.07 0.02 0.01 1,836AverageDaily —————————————————
2026 0.64 5.40 6.29 0.01 0.19 0.06 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.20 — 1,138 1,138 0.05 0.01 0.03 1,1432027 0.21 0.37 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 84.0 84.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 84.4Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —2026 0.12 0.99 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 — 188 188 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 1892027 0.04 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.9 13.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.0

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 63 of 465 ends

1432
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
12 / 75
Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -Summer(Max)
—————————————————
2026 1.46 12.9 14.5 0.02 0.58 2.85 3.43 0.53 1.36 1.89 — 2,548 2,548 0.10 0.02 0.33 2,558Daily -Winter(Max) —————————————————
2026 1.44 13.0 15.1 0.02 0.51 2.51 3.01 0.47 1.19 1.65 — 2,604 2,604 0.11 0.02 0.01 2,6142027 6.22 8.28 9.98 0.02 0.26 0.11 0.28 0.24 0.02 0.25 — 1,829 1,829 0.07 0.02 0.01 1,836AverageDaily —————————————————
2026 0.64 5.40 6.29 0.01 0.19 0.06 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.20 — 1,138 1,138 0.05 0.01 0.03 1,1432027 0.21 0.37 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 84.0 84.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 84.4Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —2026 0.12 0.99 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 — 188 188 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 1892027 0.04 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.9 13.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.0

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against ThresholdsCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Unmit. 0.45 0.18 1.79 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.13 476 479 0.24 0.02 1.31 490Mit. 0.45 0.18 1.79 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.06 474 476 0.23 0.01 1.31 488%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — 3% < 0.5% < 0.5% 3% — — 1%
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 0.42 0.19 1.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.13 459 461 0.24 0.02 0.10 472 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 64 of 465 ends

1433
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
13 / 75
Mit. 0.42 0.19 1.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.06 457 459 0.23 0.02 0.10 470 %Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 3% < 0.5% < 0.5% 3% — — 1%
AverageDaily(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 0.43 0.19 1.52 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 2.13 454 456 0.24 0.02 0.59 467Mit. 0.43 0.19 1.52 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 2.06 452 454 0.23 0.02 0.59 465%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — 3% < 0.5% 1% 3% — — 1%
Annual(Max)
—————————————————
Unmit. 0.08 0.03 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.35 75.2 75.5 0.04 < 0.005 0.10 77.4Mit. 0.08 0.03 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.34 74.8 75.2 0.04 < 0.005 0.10 77.0%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — 3% < 0.5% 1% 3% 1% — 1%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Mobile 0.20 0.14 1.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 369 369 0.02 0.01 1.24 375Area 0.25 < 0.005 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.76Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Total 0.45 0.18 1.79 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.13 476 479 0.24 0.02 1.31 490 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 65 of 465 ends

1434
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
14 / 75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily,
Winter(Max)
Mobile 0.19 0.16 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 353 353 0.02 0.01 0.03 358Area 0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Total 0.42 0.19 1.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.13 459 461 0.24 0.02 0.10 472AverageDaily —————————————————
Mobile 0.19 0.15 1.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 347 347 0.02 0.01 0.52 353Area 0.24 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.37 0.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.38Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Total 0.43 0.19 1.52 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 2.13 454 456 0.24 0.02 0.59 467Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Mobile 0.03 0.03 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 57.5 57.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 58.4Area 0.04 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06Energy < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 1.84 1.89 0.01 < 0.005 — 2.08Waste — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01Total 0.08 0.03 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.35 75.2 75.5 0.04 < 0.005 0.10 77.4

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 66 of 465 ends

1435
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
15 / 75
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Mobile 0.20 0.14 1.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 369 369 0.02 0.01 1.24 375Area 0.25 < 0.005 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.76Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Total 0.45 0.18 1.79 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.06 474 476 0.23 0.01 1.31 488Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Mobile 0.19 0.16 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 353 353 0.02 0.01 0.03 358Area 0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Total 0.42 0.19 1.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 2.06 457 459 0.23 0.02 0.10 470AverageDaily —————————————————
Mobile 0.19 0.15 1.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 347 347 0.02 0.01 0.52 353Area 0.24 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.37 0.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.38Energy < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 95.2 95.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.5Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1Waste — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 67 of 465 ends

1436
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
16 / 75
Total 0.43 0.19 1.52 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 2.06 452 454 0.23 0.02 0.59 465 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Mobile 0.03 0.03 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 57.5 57.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 58.4Area 0.04 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06Energy < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8Water — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 1.47 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67Waste — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01Total 0.08 0.03 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.34 74.8 75.2 0.04 < 0.005 0.10 77.0

3. Construction Emissions Details3.1. Demolition (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.39 12.9 14.6 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,494 2,494 0.10 0.02 — 2,503 Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 68 of 465 ends

1437
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
17 / 75
137 — < 0.005 0.01 137 137 — 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 < 0.005 0.80 0.71 0.08 Off-Road Equipment
Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.7 Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 110 110 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 111Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.16Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 69 of 465 ends

1438
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
18 / 75

3.2. Demolition (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.39 12.9 14.6 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,494 2,494 0.10 0.02 — 2,503 Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.08 0.71 0.80 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 137 137 0.01 < 0.005 — 137 Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.7 Demolition
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 70 of 465 ends

1439
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
19 / 75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily,
Summer(Max)
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 110 110 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 111Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.16Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.24 11.0 11.7 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 2.44 2.44 — 1.17 1.17 — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 71 of 465 ends

1440
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
20 / 75
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.24 11.0 11.7 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 2.44 2.44 — 1.17 1.17 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.87 1.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.88 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 72 of 465 ends

1441
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
21 / 75
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 69.7 69.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 70.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 65.8 65.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.7Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.36 0.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Site Preparation (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.24 11.0 11.7 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 73 of 465 ends

1442
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
22 / 75
— — — — — — — 1.17 1.17 — 2.44 2.44 — — — — — Dust
FromMaterialMovement
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.24 11.0 11.7 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 2.44 2.44 — 1.17 1.17 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

Page 74 of 465 ends

1443
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
23 / 75
Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 69.7 69.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 70.8Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 65.8 65.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.7Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.36 0.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.42 12.9 14.0 0.02 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 75 of 465 ends

1444
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
24 / 75
DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.02 0.14 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.9 26.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.0 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.45 4.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.47 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

Page 76 of 465 ends

1445
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
25 / 75
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
AverageDaily
—————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.97 0.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.98Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Grading (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.42 12.9 14.0 0.02 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
AverageDaily
—————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 77 of 465 ends

1446
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
26 / 75
Off-RoadEquipment

0.02 0.14 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.9 26.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.0 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 93.0 93.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33 94.4Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
AverageDaily
—————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.97 0.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.98Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 78 of 465 ends

1447
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
27 / 75
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.53 4.48 5.20 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 941 941 0.04 0.01 — 944 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.10 0.82 0.95 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 — 156 Onsitetruck

Page 79 of 465 ends

1448
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
28 / 75
Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.7 16.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 17.0Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.0Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.33 8.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.45Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.86 6.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.17Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.38 1.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.40Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.14 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.19Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 80 of 465 ends

1449
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
29 / 75
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.53 4.48 5.20 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 941 941 0.04 0.01 — 944 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.10 0.82 0.95 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 — 156 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.7 16.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 17.0Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.0Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 81 of 465 ends

1450
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
30 / 75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Average
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.33 8.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.45Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.86 6.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.17Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.38 1.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.40Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.14 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.19Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.97 8.25 9.91 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.23 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 49.3 49.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.5 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 82 of 465 ends

1451
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
31 / 75

8.20 — < 0.005 < 0.005 8.17 8.17 — < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 Off-Road Equipment
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.7Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.4Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.35 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Building Construction (2027) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 83 of 465 ends

1452
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
32 / 75
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.97 8.25 9.91 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.23 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 49.3 49.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.5 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.17 8.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.20 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.7Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.4Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.35 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 84 of 465 ends

1453
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
33 / 75
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2027) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.46 4.30 6.49 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 992 992 0.04 0.01 — 995 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.3 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.50 4.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.51 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 85 of 465 ends

1454
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
34 / 75
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 108 108 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 109Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.98 2.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.02Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.50Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Paving (2027) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.46 4.30 6.49 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 992 992 0.04 0.01 — 995 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 86 of 465 ends

1455
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
35 / 75
Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.3 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 108 108 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 109Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.98 2.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.02Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 87 of 465 ends

1456
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
36 / 75
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.50 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

6.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment
< 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.66 3.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.67 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.61 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 88 of 465 ends

1457
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
37 / 75
ArchitectCoatings

0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.11 3.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.15Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.14. Architectural Coating (2027) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 89 of 465 ends

1458
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
38 / 75
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

6.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
—————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.11 3.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.15 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 90 of 465 ends

1459
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
39 / 75
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily —————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use4.1.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing

0.20 0.14 1.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 369 369 0.02 0.01 1.24 375 Total 0.20 0.14 1.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 369 369 0.02 0.01 1.24 375Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 91 of 465 ends

1460
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
40 / 75
358 0.03 0.01 0.02 353 353 — 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.40 0.16 0.19 Single FamilyHousing
Total 0.19 0.16 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 353 353 0.02 0.01 0.03 358Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing

0.03 0.03 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 57.5 57.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 58.4 Total 0.03 0.03 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 57.5 57.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 58.4

4.1.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing

0.19 0.16 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 353 353 0.02 0.01 0.03 358 Total 0.19 0.16 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 353 353 0.02 0.01 0.03 358Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing

Page 92 of 465 ends

1461
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
41 / 75

4.2. Energy4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — — 8.20 8.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 8.20 8.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 93 of 465 ends

1462
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
42 / 75
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 49.5 49.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.7Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — — 8.20 8.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 8.20 8.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
< 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8 Total < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
< 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 94 of 465 ends

1463
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
43 / 75
Total < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.57 7.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59 Total < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.57 7.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
< 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8 Total < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
< 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8 Total < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.8Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.57 7.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59 Total < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.57 7.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 95 of 465 ends

1464
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
44 / 75

4.3.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
ConsumerProducts

0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment

0.03 < 0.005 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.76 Total 0.25 < 0.005 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.76Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
ConsumerProducts

0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —ConsumerProducts

0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings
< 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 96 of 465 ends

1465
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
45 / 75

0.06 — < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 Landsca pe
Total 0.04 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06

4.3.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
ConsumerProducts

0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment

0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 97 of 465 ends

1466
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
46 / 75
ArchitectCoatings
< 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 Total 0.04 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use4.4.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 11.1 11.4 0.04 < 0.005 — 12.6Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 1.84 1.89 0.01 < 0.005 — 2.08
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 1.84 1.89 0.01 < 0.005 — 2.08 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 98 of 465 ends

1467
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
47 / 75

4.4.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.27 8.87 9.14 0.03 < 0.005 — 10.1Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 1.47 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 1.47 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use4.5.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 99 of 465 ends

1468
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
48 / 75
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04

4.5.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 100 of 465 ends

1469
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
49 / 75
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1.79 0.00 1.79 0.18 0.00 — 6.26 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04
Total — — — — — — — — — — 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.00 — 1.04

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use4.6.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 101 of 465 ends

1470
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
50 / 75

4.6.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
SingleFamilyHousing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —SingleFamilyHousing — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type4.7.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 102 of 465 ends

1471
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
51 / 75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily,
Summer(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type4.8.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 103 of 465 ends

1472
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
52 / 75
CO2e R N2O CH4 CO2T NBCO2 BCO2 PM2.5T PM2.5D PM2.5E PM10T PM10D PM10E SO2 CO NOx ROG Equipme nt
Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type4.9.1. Unmitigated Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 104 of 465 ends

1473
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
53 / 75
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 105 of 465 ends

1474
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
54 / 75

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 106 of 465 ends

1475
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
55 / 75
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered —————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered —————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered —————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 107 of 465 ends

1476
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
56 / 75
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
—————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 108 of 465 ends

1477
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
57 / 75
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) —————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered —————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————Daily,Winter(Max) —————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered —————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 109 of 465 ends

1478
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
58 / 75
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequestered
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
—————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———————————————————

5. Activity Data5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase DescriptionDemolition Demolition 3/2/2026 3/30/2026 5.00 20.0 —Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/31/2026 4/2/2026 5.00 2.00 —Grading Grading 4/3/2026 4/8/2026 5.00 4.00 —Building Construction Building Construction 4/9/2026 1/14/2027 5.00 200 —Paving Paving 1/15/2027 1/29/2027 5.00 10.0 —Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/30/2027 2/13/2027 5.00 10.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load FactorDemolition Concrete/Industrial Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 110 of 465 ends

1479
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
59 / 75
Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 82.0 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 81.0 0.42Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load FactorDemolition Concrete/Industrial Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 111 of 465 ends

1480
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
60 / 75
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 82.0 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 81.0 0.42Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle MixDemolition ————Demolition Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Demolition Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTDemolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 112 of 465 ends

1481
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
61 / 75
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation ————Site Preparation Worker 7.50 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Site Preparation Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTSite Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTSite Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDTGrading ————Grading Worker 10.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Grading Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTGrading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTGrading Onsite truck — — HHDTBuilding Construction ————Building Construction Worker 1.80 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Building Construction Vendor 0.53 7.63 HHDT,MHDTBuilding Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTBuilding Construction Onsite truck — — HHDTPaving— — — —Paving Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Paving Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTPaving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTPaving Onsite truck — — HHDTArchitectural Coating ————Architectural Coating Worker 0.36 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Architectural Coating Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTArchitectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTArchitectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 113 of 465 ends

1482
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
62 / 75
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ————Demolition Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Demolition Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTDemolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTDemolition Onsite truck — — HHDTSite Preparation ————Site Preparation Worker 7.50 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Site Preparation Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTSite Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTSite Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDTGrading ————Grading Worker 10.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Grading Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTGrading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTGrading Onsite truck — — HHDTBuilding Construction ————Building Construction Worker 1.80 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Building Construction Vendor 0.53 7.63 HHDT,MHDTBuilding Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTBuilding Construction Onsite truck — — HHDTPaving— — — —Paving Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Paving Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDTPaving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTPaving Onsite truck — — HHDTArchitectural Coating ————Architectural Coating Worker 0.36 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 114 of 465 ends

1483
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
63 / 75
Architectural Coating Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTArchitectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control StrategiesNon-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.5.5. Architectural Coatings Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 19,744 6,581 0.00 0.00 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres)Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —Site Preparation — — 1.88 0.00 —Grading — — 4.00 0.00 —Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 ReductionWater Exposed Area 2 61% 61%

5.7. Construction Paving
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 115 of 465 ends

1484
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
64 / 75
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 0.06 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions FactorskWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O2026 0.00 589 0.03 < 0.0052027 0.00 589 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/YearSingle FamilyHousing

47.2 47.7 42.8 17,022 443 447 401 159,641

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/YearSingle FamilyHousing

47.2 47.7 42.8 17,022 443 447 401 159,641

5.10. Operational Area Sources5.10.1. Hearths5.10.1.1. Unmitigated5.10.1.2. Mitigated Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 116 of 465 ends

1485
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
65 / 75

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sqft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sqft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
19743.75 6,581 0.00 0.00 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit ValueSnow Days day/yr 0.00Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit ValueSnow Days day/yr 0.00Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption5.11.1. UnmitigatedElectricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Single Family Housing 30,706 589 0.0330 0.0040 142,585

5.11.2. MitigatedElectricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Single Family Housing 30,706 589 0.0330 0.0040 142,585 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 117 of 465 ends

1486
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
66 / 75

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption5.12.1. Unmitigated Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year)Single Family Housing 175,665 1,069,677

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year)Single Family Housing 140,532 855,741

5.13. Operational Waste Generation5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)Single Family Housing 3.32 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)Single Family Housing 3.32 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment5.14.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times ServicedSingle Family Housing Average room A/C & Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 118 of 465 ends

1487
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
67 / 75

1.00 0.00 0.60 0.12 1,430 R-134a Single Family Housing Household refrigerators and/orfreezers

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times ServicedSingle Family Housing Average room A/C & Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household
refrigerators and/orfreezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment5.15.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 119 of 465 ends

1488
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
68 / 75

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation5.18.1. Land Use Change5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 120 of 465 ends

1489
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
69 / 75
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report6.1. Climate Risk SummaryCal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 whichassumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location UnitTemperature and Extreme Heat 15.7 annual days of extreme heatExtreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mmSea Level Rise — meters of inundation depthWildfire 8.89 annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures fromobserved historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall ifreceived over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), andconsider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled withextreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 metersWildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical dataof climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. Thefour simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range ofdifferent rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability ScoreTemperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/AExtreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/ASea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/AWildfire N/A N/A N/A N/AFlooding N/A N/A N/A N/ADrought N/A N/A N/A N/A Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 121 of 465 ends

1490
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
70 / 75
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing thegreatest exposure.The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5representing the greatest ability to adapt.The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reductionmeasures.6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability ScoreTemperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/AExtreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/ASea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/AWildfire N/A N/A N/A N/AFlooding N/A N/A N/A N/ADrought N/A N/A N/A N/ASnowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/AAir Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing thegreatest exposure.The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5representing the greatest ability to adapt.The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reductionmeasures.6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures7. Health and Equity Details7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 ScoresThe maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 122 of 465 ends

1491
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
71 / 75
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —AQ-Ozone 50.5AQ-PM 15.4AQ-DPM 58.2Drinking Water 60.0Lead Risk Housing 6.84Pesticides 57.7Toxic Releases 10.6Traffic 80.1Effect Indicators —CleanUp Sites 78.7Groundwater 60.4Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 0.00Impaired Water Bodies 93.4Solid Waste 35.7Sensitive Population —Asthma 7.05Cardio-vascular 45.0Low Birth Weights 4.54Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —Education 15.2Housing 21.6Linguistic 22.9Poverty 4.02Unemployment 8.69

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 123 of 465 ends

1492
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
72 / 75
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census TractEconomic —Above Poverty 92.64724753Employed 58.62953933Median HI 90.27332221Education —Bachelor's or higher 78.6603362High school enrollment 100Preschool enrollment 67.35531888Transportation —Auto Access 98.98626973Active commuting 12.51122803Social —2-parent households 98.40882844Voting 98.8836135Neighborhood —Alcohol availability 87.56576415Park access 35.44206339Retail density 26.84460413Supermarket access 21.57064032Tree canopy 71.57705633Housing —Homeownership 97.12562556Housing habitability 99.51238291Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 84.98652637Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 99.08892596Uncrowded housing 85.268831Health Outcomes — Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 124 of 465 ends

1493
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
73 / 75
Insured adults 95.534454
Arthritis 2.5Asthma ER Admissions 91.6High Blood Pressure 4.8Cancer (excluding skin) 2.0Asthma 80.2Coronary Heart Disease 5.6Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 29.1Diagnosed Diabetes 36.9Life Expectancy at Birth 82.2Cognitively Disabled 87.2Physically Disabled 85.5Heart Attack ER Admissions 83.2Mental Health Not Good 87.0Chronic Kidney Disease 10.6Obesity 74.1Pedestrian Injuries 19.6Physical Health Not Good 66.1Stroke 26.0Health Risk Behaviors —Binge Drinking 71.2Current Smoker 89.7No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 77.2Climate Change Exposures —Wildfire Risk 10.8SLR Inundation Area 0.0Children 95.8Elderly 9.2 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 125 of 465 ends

1494
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
74 / 75
English Speaking 67.3
Foreign-born 29.8Outdoor Workers 56.8Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —Impervious Surface Cover 87.0Traffic Density 88.6Traffic Access 50.8Other Indices —Hardship 9.9Other Decision Support —2016 Voting 98.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census TractCalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 12.0Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 91.0Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) NoProject Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) NoProject Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.7.4. Health & Equity MeasuresNo Health & Equity Measures selected.7.5. Evaluation ScorecardHealth & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.7.6. Health & Equity Custom MeasuresNo Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 126 of 465 ends

1495
Item8.

Hamilton Lane Escondido Detailed Report, 3/6/2025
75 / 75

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen JustificationOperations: Hearths No fireplaces or wood stoves Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 127 of 465 ends

1496
Item8.

Appendix B - Biological Resources
Memorandum
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 128 of 465 ends

1497
Item8.

Page 1 of 13 ends

Tierra Data, Inc.
10110 W. Lilac Road
Escondido, CA 92026
(760) 749-2247
MEMO
To: Lee Duran
From: Derek Langsford, PhD, CSE
Principal Scientist
Date: July 9, 2024
Subject: Biological Resources at 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California 92025 Dear Mr. Duran:

Introduction
This memo has been prepared to provide you (Client) with a biological assessment for the approximately

6.2-acre, vacant parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 238-360-27-68) located at 1100 Hamilton Lane, in the City of Escondido (City), San Diego County, California (Figure 1).

The California Environmental Quality Act requires that any project that is not exempt undergo assessment to determine if any impacts are significant and to identify measures that would reduce effects to less than significant. This memo can be used by the City to determine if additional studies or reports are needed in consideration of your project.

Location
The irregularly-shaped, vacant parcel is in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Bernardo Drive and Hamilton Lane in south Escondido with Park Drive and Felicita Creek to the southwest and residential development to the east, north and west (Figure 1).

Proposed Project
The owner proposed to subdivide the 6.2-acre parcel into 5 lots for future construction of single-family homes plus a retention basin to capture stormwater. Access to Lot 1 would be off Bernardo Drive, whereas access to Lots 2 through 5 would be from a shared driveway from Hamilton Lane.

Methods
On Monday April 22nd, 2024, TDI Biologists Ben Van Allen and Caitlin Kreutz conducted a comprehensive general biological survey of the parcel. The survey accomplished several tasks, including vegetation analysis, animal and plant survey, rare plant survey, measurement of trees, and habitat assessment for sensitive species to occur. Commencing at 0900 hours and concluding at 1200 hours PST, the whole site survey was surveyed, conducted under cool and cloudy weather conditions, with temperatures ranging between 62-68ºF.

A recent high-resolution aerial photograph was used for delineating vegetation boundaries, identifying and documenting species. Photos were taken to provide a photographic record of the property.

Results
Setting
The subject parcel is located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in the southern portion of the City, west of Interstate 15, having been annexed into the City from the unincorporated area that now occurs on just the north, east and south sides of the parcel with the City being to the west across Bernardo Drive. The parcel is undeveloped but there are developed residential neighborhoods to the north, west and east. To the south there are a handful of developed residential lots, but also additional undeveloped land and the upstream portion of Felicita Creek being just across Park Drive to the south.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 129 of 465 ends

1498
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 2 of 13 ends

Figure 1: Vicinity of 1100 Hamilton Lane Parcel in south Escondido Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 130 of 465 ends

1499
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 3 of 13 ends

Topography
The parcel is mostly flat with a low at the western-most point of the parcel at 635 feet above mean sea level (amsl) and a high point of 662 feet amsl in the rock just north of the trees in the southern portion of the parcel (USGS TopoView 2024). The parcel slopes down in all directions from that high point. No depressions or channels occur on site.

Soils
The site supports two types of soil (USDA 2024): Placentia sandy loam (PfC) 2-9% slope in the west of the parcel, and with the majority being Fallbrook sandy loam 9 to 15% slopes (FaD2). PfC can be hydric if in depressions, but FaD2 has no hydric rating.

Wetlands
No USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetlands occur on site, but Felicita Creek runs northwest to southeast on the far side of Park Drive from the parcel. A tributary to Felicita Creek occurs to the east of Felicita Road, half a block to the east of the parcel. No FEMA Floodplains occur on site (FEMA 2024).

History
The earliest aerial photos show that the site was already cleared with a portion supporting Orchard agriculture in 1947 surrounded by cleared agricultural land and other orchards (Historic Aerials 2024).

Homes on large lots had appeared in the vicinity by the 1960s when the orchard on site appears to have been abandoned with all trace gone by the late 1970s. Some of the existing trees on the site were already present by then. The site has been kept clear ever since with no signs of shrub growth suggesting it was being mowed regularly. By 1980, denser homes had been built to the east, and then to the north, south, and west by 1990. Bernardo School, to the south on Bernardo Drive was built around 2005. The last development nearby to the west was built between 2009 and 2013 (Historic Aerials 2024).

The parcel has been kept clear apart from trees in the south and the rocks in the center and south.

Examination of aerial imagery since 2010, has shown evidence of mowing (parallel tire tracks and mowing strips) at least once per year every year between 2010 and 2022 (Google Earth 2024). The new owner is in receipt of a Weed Abatement Order from the City weed abatement order from the City pursuant to Escondido Municipal Code Property Maintenance Ordinance Section 6-484(d)(1) which necessitates “the management of non-native plants and grasses to reduce fire risk” that is achieved through regular mowing (See Attachment 1).

Biological Resources
The parcel is primarily Disturbed Habitat (DH) composed of annual non-native grasses and non-native vegetation, reflecting the history of agricultural usage and repeated mowing for weed abatement. Due to the significant disturbance and a shift from the original vegetation composition, resilient and fast-growing non-native species and grasses now outcompete the native flora including several brome grasses (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens, B. hordeaceus and B. diandrus) and slender wild oat (Avena barbata), as well as non-native forbs, such as mustards (Hirshfeldia incana and Brassica nigra), and filarees (Erodium brachycarpum, E. cicutarium, and E. moschatum).

Despite the dominance of non-native species, the parcel supports some native species, predominantly annual forbs such as Menzies' Fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii), Narrow Leaf Bedstraw (Galium angustifolium) and a few diminutive perennial species including Coast Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), and Broom Baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides) which have clearly been mowed annually.

Additionally, several large piles of mulch have been placed on the property, with some already spread.

These piles consist primarily of Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta) material, laden with seeds that are now sprouting abundantly.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 131 of 465 ends

1500
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 4 of 13 ends

Animals observed included species of native and non-native Argentine ants (Linepithema humile), Great Basin fence lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis) on the rocks, a dead gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer catenifer), evidence of Coyote (Canis latrans), Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), and a woodrat nest (Neotoma sp.), and common birds including mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), house finch (house finch), California towhee (Melozone crissalis), and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Larger birds were using the off-site trees in the vicinity, including California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), hooded oriole (Icterus cucullatus), acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), and American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). A red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicansis) was seen flying overhead in the area.

No special status plants or animals were observed by TDI biologists at the time of the survey.

Mature and Heritage Trees
The Escondido Municipal Code regulates removal of trees identified as Mature or Heritage (i.e., Protected), trees (Sec 33-1069). Mature and Protected trees are defined in the Escondido Municipal Code Sec 33-1052 as:
• Mature tree is any self-supporting woody perennial plant, native or ornamental, with a single welldefined stem or multiple stems supporting a crown of branches. The single stem, or one of the multiple stems of any mature oak tree (genus Quercus), shall have a diameter 4 inches or greater when measured at 4½ feet diameter at breast height (DBH) above the tree’s natural grade. All other mature trees shall have a diameter of 8 inches DBH, or greater, for a single stem or one of the multiple stems. • Protected tree is any oak (genus Quercus) which has a 10-inch or greater DBH, or any other species or individual specimen listed on the local historic register, or determined to substantially contribute to the historic character of a property or structure listed on the local historic register, pursuant to Article 40 of the Escondido Zoning Code.

The results of the tree survey is shown below (Table 1, Figure 2):

Table 1: Mature and Protected trees.

Number Scientific Name Common Name DBH Status
1 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 5 1/8” None
2 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 20” Heritage
3 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 19.5” Heritage
4 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 20” Heritage
5 Olea europaea European Olive 20” Mature
6 Olea europaea European Olive 15.5” Mature
7 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15.75” Heritage
8 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 21” Heritage
9 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 16” Heritage
10 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 7” Mature
11 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 5.75” Mature
12 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15.75” Heritage
13 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 5.25” Mature
14 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 1.5” None
15 Querus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 3.75” None
16 Schinus terebinthifolia Brazilian Pepper 10” Mature
17 Olea europaea European Olive 3.75” None
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 132 of 465 ends

1501
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 5 of 13 ends

Figure 2: Trees measured at the Hamilton Lane parcel.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 133 of 465 ends

1502
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 6 of 13 ends

Most of the trees on site are in the southern portion of the site. Two trees are in the west and center of the site, one a small black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia; #1) and the other a Heritage coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia; #2). The southern portion of the site contains 6 Heritage coast live oak trees (#s 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 12), 3 Mature coast live oak trees (#s 10, 11and 13), and 3 mature non-native trees (#s 5, 6, and 16). The other 4 trees do not meet the Protected tree criteria.

Boulders
The property has several natural boulder outcroppings and clusters which contribute to the site's visual, geological, and ecological diversity. Per the City Subdivisions and Zoning Code Chapter 33 Zoning, Article 64 Design Review, Sec 33-1356 Elements of design considerations. Natural features such as rock outcroppings, are considered visual resources must be preserved in a natural state, to the extent possible.

Boulders occur in the center and south of the site.

Impacts
The proposed project would create 5 building pads, a driveway and a stormwater retention basin (Figure 3).

Biological Resources
Impacts would occur to most of the parcel but as the vegetation community is considered disturbed because of the weed abatement order, impacts to sensitive vegetation communities would not occur.

No special status plant or animal species were detected, and none are expected to occur because of the repeated mowing. No impacts would occur to special status plant or animal species.

No wetlands occur on site and so no permits would be required from wetland permitting agencies. The site is not in a FEMA floodplain area. No impacts would occur to wetland vegetation or flood areas.

The parcel is bordered by development to the north, east, and west, and has a marginal connection through an adjacent parcel across Park Drive to the southwest to Felicita Creek. With the site being mowed annually, the site does not act as a significant nursery site for special status species and being surrounded on three sides by residential development, does not act a corridor. Impacts would not occur to wildlife corridors or to significant nursery sites.

The City is no longer participating in the local regional Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) effort and the site was not in a Focused Planning Area of the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP).

So, the proposed Project would neither impact regional conservation planning efforts under the NCCP or MHCP, and because of its location and features, development would not impact any future regional conservation planning efforts.

Two local policies pertain to the project: the City regulations and requirements that deal with Mature or Heritage Trees and Boulders.

Mature or Heritage Trees
Several Mature and Heritage Trees are located on Lots 2, 4, and 5 (Figure 3). The proposed project could potentially remove 2 Heritage coast live oak trees located within the pad of Lot 4 (#3) and Lot 5 (#7) while avoiding all other oak trees. A coast live oak tree on the boundary of Lots 4 and 5 (#4) would be avoided.

Two additional Mature olive trees (#s 5 and 6) would also be removed by grading Lot 5. Lastly a black locust tree (#1) meets neither criterion for being a Heritage or Mature tree would be removed to create the retention basin. All the impacted Heritage or Mature trees are far from the 3 roads that border the parcel and the loss of four trees would not significantly change views for area residents or the aesthetics of the area. It is expected that future homeowners will plant trees around their homes that will offset any aesthetic impacts from removal of the four trees. The Project would be in compliance with City’s Municipal Code requirements for trees.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 134 of 465 ends

1503
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 7 of 13 ends

Figure3: Proposed project over an aerial image of the site and tree locations.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 135 of 465 ends

1504
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 8 of 13 ends

Boulders
Many boulders occur on the site and impact would occur through grading for the shared driveway and pads on Lots 4 and 5 (Figure 3). The proposed grading of pads was adjusted to avoid the largest boulders on Lots 4 and 5, but limitations prevented the shared driveway from avoiding some boulders. All boulders in areas to be graded would be moved to Lots 2, 3, and 4 outside of grading areas to retain all boulders on the site. The Project would be in compliance with City’s boulder design considerations.

Conclusion
The proposed Project would not impact sensitive vegetation communities, sensitive species, wetlands or jurisdictional drainages, wildlife nursery sites, or corridors. Impacts to Mature and Heritage trees would not be significant and impacts to 4 coast live oaks would be offset by residential plantings. Impacts to boulders would be avoided by the grading design and by moving boulders away from driveways and pad area and retaining them on site.

In addition, all clearing or removal of vegetation will be performed prior to or after the bird breeding season, February 15 through September 15 (i.e., only between September 16 and February 14) to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and pertinent sections of the California Fish and Game (CFG) Code.

By avoiding clearing during the bird-breeding season, and designing to minimize impacts to trees and boulders, the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on biological resources and will be in compliance with the pertinent sections of the Escondido Municipal Code and design considerations.

If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 751 6169 or email me at [email protected].

Derek H. Langsford, PhD, CSE
Principal Scientist, Terrestrial and Wetland Resources
References
Calflora 2024. Calflora (native plant database) www.calflora.org. Accessed April through July 2024.

City of Escondido 2018. An Ordinance of The City Council of the City of Escondido Amending Chapter 11, Article 2 of the Escondido Municipal Code by adding Sections 11-39 through 11-52, pertaining to Abatement of Weeds and Rubbish https://fireprevention.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/escondidocode.pdf City of Escondido. Municipal Code. Section 33-1068 Vegetation Removal Permits. https://ecode360.com/43267342?highlight=dbh&searchId=22905359102687303#43267604 City of Escondido. Municipal Code. Section 33-1069. Vegetation Protection and Replacement Standards.

City of Escondido. Municipal Code Section 6-484(d)(1) Definitions.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2022. National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Nos. 06073C1636G and 06073C1636H. https://msc.fema.gov/portal. Accessed June 2022.

Google Earth 2024. Accessed April through July 2024.

Historical Aerials. 2024. www.historicaerials.com. Accessed April 2024 through July 2024.

Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 136 of 465 ends

1505
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 9 of 13 ends

Oberbauer, T., M. Kelly, and J. Buegge. 2008. Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California,” Robert F. Holland, Ph.D., October 1986.

San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). 2003. Final Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) Volumes 1 & 2. Prepared for Multiple Habitat Conservation Program. March 2003. http://www.sandag.org/programs/environment/habitat_preservation/mhcp_vol1.pdf and mhcp_vol2.pdf.

Accessed June 2024.

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2024. Web Soil Survey. Accessed May 2024 https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. National Wetlands Inventory. Washington, D.C. Available:
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Accessed: June 2024.

Attachments
Attachment 1: Weed Abatement Notice
Attachment 2: Photos
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 137 of 465 ends

1506
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 10 of 13 ends

Attachment 1: Weed Abatement Notice
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 138 of 465 ends

1507
Item8.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 139 of 465 ends

1508
Item8.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 140 of 465 ends

1509
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 11 of 13 ends

Attchment 2: Photos
Photo 1: The northwest corner of the site towards the intersection of Hamilton Ane and Bernardo Drive.

Photo 2: Looking southeast across the parcel towards its interior.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 141 of 465 ends

1510
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 12 of 13 ends

Photo 3: Prominent rocks 115 feet from Hamiton Lane, some of which would need to be moved.

Photo 4: Looking southeast into the coast Live oak trees in the south of the site.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 142 of 465 ends

1511
Item8.

Tierra Data, Inc. Memo | July 9, 2024

Page 13 of 13 ends

Photo 5: Underneath oaks growing in the south of
the site.

Photo 6: Looking east along Hamilton
Lane.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 143 of 465 ends

1512
Item8.

Appendix C - Weed Abatement Orders
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 144 of 465 ends

1513
Item8.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 145 of 465 ends

1514
Item8.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 146 of 465 ends

1515
Item8.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 147 of 465 ends

1516
Item8.

Appendix D - Phase I Cultural
Resources Report - Confidential
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 148 of 465 ends

1517
Item8.

Appendix E – Monitoring Well
Decommissioning Documentation
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 149 of 465 ends

1518
Item8.
724 PRP Ltrs re MW-56 and MW-57 decomission 5 21 2009.doc

CHATHAM SITE PRP GROUP
1322 Scott Street, Suite 104
San Diego, CA 92106
(619)-546-8377
(619)-546-9980 FAX
Email: [email protected]
May 21, 2009
Mr. Joe Cully
Site Mitigation Program

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND CONTROL
5796 Corporate Ave
Cypress, CA 90630-4732
Subject: Decommissioning of Monitor Wells MW-56 and MW-57, Chatham Site Dear Joe:

Attached you will find a letter from Hargis + Associates, Inc. that documents that monitor wells MW-56 and MW-57 have been decommissioned. Please contact either Mike Palmer or me with any questions or comments.

Sincerely,
Chatham Site PRP Group
Edward D. Modiano
Project Coordinator
Enclosure
cc: See Attached List
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 150 of 465 ends

1519
Item8.
724 PRP Ltrs re MW-56 and MW-57 decomission 5 21 2009.doc cc (with enclosure):

Number of Copies Individuals Receiving Transmittal
1 Mr. Joseph Cully/Mr. Theo Johnson/Mr. S.Steven Hariri, California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Cypress
1 Mr. Ed Modiano/Mr. Michael Palmer, de maximis, inc.
cc (without enclosure):

Number of Copies Individuals Receiving Transmittal
1 Mr. Greg Holmes, California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Cypress
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 151 of 465 ends

1520
Item8.

HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.

HYDROGEOLOGY x ENGINEERING
Mission City Corporate Center
2365 Northside Drive, Suite C-100
San Diego, CA 92108
Phone: 619.521.0165
Fax: 619.521.8580
Other Offices:

Mesa, AZ
Tucson, AZ
May 21, 2009

VIA E-MAIL & US MAIL
Mr. Ed Modiano
Project Coordinator

CHATHAM SITE PRP GROUP
1322 Scott Street, Suite 101
San Diego, California 92106
Re: Decommissioning of Monitor Wells MW-56 and
MW-57, Chatham Site, Escondido, California _
Dear Mr. Modiano:

This letter has been prepared by Hargis + Associates, Inc. (H+A) on behalf of the Chatham Site PRP Group (the Group) to document the decommissioning of water table monitor well MW-56 and deep monitor well MW-57 at the Chatham Site, Escondido, California.

Monitor well MW-56 was located on a residential property northwest of the Chatham Yard, at 1261 Gamble Lane, now owned by Mr. Simon Salam. At Mr. Salam’s request, H+A recommended the decommissioning of this well and monitor well MW-55 in a letter submitted to DTSC dated October 17, 2008. DTSC approved the decommissioning of monitor well MW-56, but not the decommissioning of MW-55, in a letter dated November 12, 2008. Decommissioning of monitor well MW-56 was conducted on December 4, 2008 by drilling out the casing and well materials and grouting the boring, in accordance with Well Destruction Permit No. LMON106106, issued by the County of San Diego, Department of Environmental Health (DEH).

Monitor well MW-57 was located on a vacant land parcel on the south side of Hamilton Lane, between Bernardo Avenue and Our Country Road, owned by Mr. Jeff Badelt. At Mr. Badelt’s request, and following the successful installation of replacement monitor well MW-67 north of the parcel, H+A recommended the decommissioning of monitor well MW-57 in a letter submitted to DTSC dated October 17, 2008. DTSC approved the decommissioning of monitor well MW-57 in the letter dated November 12, 2008. Decommissioning of monitor well MW-57 by pressure grouting was completed on January 16, 2009, in general accordance with Well Destruction Permit No. LMON106099, issued by DEH.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 152 of 465 ends

1521
Item8.

HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.

Mr. Ed Modiano
May 21, 2009

Page 2 ends

If you have any questions or comments, please contact us.

Sincerely,
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.

Greg T. Cranham, PG 5897, CEG 1994 James D. Schwall, PE CH5044 Senior Hydrogeologist Project Manager
GTC/JDS/ama
724 Ltrs modiano08 WellDstrctn re MW-56 and MW-57.doc
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 153 of 465 ends

1522
Item8.

Appendix F – Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 154 of 465 ends

1523
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California 92029
April 22, 2025
Prepared For:

Hamilton Bernardo LLC
PO Box 1795
La Jolla, CA 92038
Project Number 25-02-025
Prepared by:

Weis Environmental, LLC
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 585-7070
www.weisenviro.com
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 155 of 465 ends

1524
Item8.
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 585-7070
www.weisenviro.com
April 22, 2025
Lee Duran
Hamilton Bernardo LLC
PO Box 1795
La Jolla, CA 92038
Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
Project Number 25-02-025
Dear Mr. Duran:

Weis Environmental, LLC has completed the contracted environmental consulting services for the above-referenced project. The services were performed in accordance with our proposal and agreement fully executed by all parties. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been performed in accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E1527-21 and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Part 312. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,
Weis Environmental, LLC
Daniel Weis. R.E.H.S.

Environmental Manager
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 156 of 465 ends

1525
Item8.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose...................................................................................................................................1

1.2 Scope of the Assessment........................................................................................................1

1.3 Limitations and Exceptions....................................................................................................2

1.4 Special Terms and Conditions................................................................................................3

1.5 Limiting Conditions and Deviations ......................................................................................3

1.6 Data Failure and Data Gaps ...................................................................................................3

1.7 Reliance..................................................................................................................................3

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................4

2.1 Location and Legal Description .............................................................................................4

2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics............................................................................................4

2.3 Current Use of the Site...........................................................................................................4

2.4 Description of Site Improvements..........................................................................................4

2.5 Utilities...................................................................................................................................4

2.6 Description of Adjoining Properties ......................................................................................5

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................................6

3.1 Topography ............................................................................................................................6

3.2 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................................6

3.3 Geology..................................................................................................................................6

3.4 Hydrogeology.........................................................................................................................7

3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration.........................................................................................................7

4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ...........................................................................................8

4.1 Title Records ..........................................................................................................................8

4.2 Environmental Liens ..............................................................................................................8

4.3 Activity and Use Limitations .................................................................................................8

4.4 Specialized or Actual Knowledge or Experience...................................................................8

4.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ..............................................8

4.6 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues .....................................................................9

4.7 Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information...........................................................9

4.8 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA......................................................................................9

4.9 Proceedings Involving the Site...............................................................................................9

4.10 Other Provided Documents ....................................................................................................9

5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW.......................................................................................10

5.1 Standard ASTM Regulatory Database Search .....................................................................10

5.2 Non-ASTM Regulatory Database Search ............................................................................12

5.3 Regulatory Agency File Reviews.........................................................................................13

6.0 HISTORICAL RESOURCE REVIEW .......................................................................................14

6.1 Aerial Photographs...............................................................................................................14

6.2 Topographic Maps ...............................................................................................................15

6.3 Other Historical Sources ......................................................................................................15 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 157 of 465 ends

1526
Item8.

7.0 SITE RECONAISSANCE ...........................................................................................................16

7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions................................................................................16

7.2 Current General Site and Vicinity Characteristics ...............................................................16

7.3 Indications of Past Site and Vicinity Uses ...........................................................................16

7.4 Site-Specific Observations ...................................................................................................16

8.0 INTERVIEWS .............................................................................................................................18

8.1 Site Owner............................................................................................................................18

8.2 Key Site Manager.................................................................................................................18

8.3 Current Occupants................................................................................................................18

8.4 Local Government Official ..................................................................................................18

8.5 Other Parties.........................................................................................................................18

9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES – NON-SCOPE ASTM CONSIDERATIONS...............................20

10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS....................................................................................................21

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................22

12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT..........................................................23

13.0 ASSUMPTIONS........................................................................................................................24

14.0 DEFINITIONS...........................................................................................................................25

15.0 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................................28

15.1 Documents, Plans and Reports.............................................................................................28

15.2 Personal Communications....................................................................................................28

15.3 Agencies Consulted..............................................................................................................28

FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Plan
Figure 3 Topographic Map

APPENDICES
Appendix A User Provided Information
Appendix B Regulatory Database Report
Appendix C Regulatory Agency Records
Appendix D Historical Resources
Appendix E Photographs
Appendix F Interview Questionnaire
Appendix G Qualifications
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 158 of 465 ends

1527
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 1 of 28 ends

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the methods and findings of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California (Site) performed in conformance with the contract/agreement for this assignment and the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) as published in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312.

EPA promulgated the AAI rule that became effective in November 2006 and the EPA has indicated that the ASTM E1527-21 practice is consistent with the requirements of AAI and may be used to comply with the provisions of the AAI rule.

1.1 Purpose
The purpose of the ASTM E1527-21 practice (framework for this Phase I ESA) is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an ESA of a parcel of real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (Title 42 United States Code [U.S.C.] Section 9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. Section 9601(35)(B).

In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting this Phase I ESA of the Site, the goal of the processes established by the ASTM E1527-21 practice is to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental condition is defined as (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. In addition, controlled recognized environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions and/or de minimis conditions, if identified during the completion of the assessment, are discussed herein. Definitions of these terms and other key terminology relevant to the practice are included in Section 14.0 of this report.

1.2 Scope of the Assessment
In general terms, this Phase I ESA included the acquisition of readily available/accessible and practically reviewable regulatory records and historical information, a subject property reconnaissance, interviews and preparation of this written report of findings. A more detailed description of the four primary components of the Phase I ESA is presented below.

Records Review - A review of Federal, State, Tribal and local standard ASTM and non-ASTM regulatory databases for a myriad of environmental identifiers including but not limited to properties with underground storage tanks (USTs), properties with leaking USTs, properties that have reported spills/releases that did not occur from a leaking UST, businesses that utilize hazardous materials and/or Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 159 of 465 ends

1528
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 2 of 28 ends

generate hazardous waste and hazardous waste disposal locations. The regulatory review may also include public records requests with one or more Federal, State, Tribal and/or local agencies. A review of historical sources is also completed to help ascertain previous land uses of the property in question and in the surrounding area.

Site Reconnaissance - A property inspection and viewing of adjacent and surrounding properties for conditions that could be recognized environmental conditions.

Interviews - Interviews with present and past owners, operators and/or occupants of a property and local government officials.

Reporting - Evaluation of the information gathered during the completion of the Phase I ESA and the subsequent preparation of a written report.

1.3 Limitations and Exceptions
Concerns regarding liability under CERCLA and analogous State laws, have been a primary driver for Phase I ESA assignments in commercial real estate transactions. While the ASTM E1527-21 practice can be used in many contexts, familiarity with CERCLA and its potential LLPs is critical in understanding and applying the ASTM E1527-21 practice. We advise consultation with legal counsel if further inquiry or information is desired.

AAI represents the minimum level of inquiry necessary to support the LLPs. However, it is important to understand that additional inquiry ultimately may be necessary or desirable for legal as well as business reasons depending upon the outcome of this inquiry and the particular risk tolerances of a given user. For example, additional inquiry may assist a user of a Phase I ESA in determining whether they would have continuing obligations in the event they acquire a given property and may also assist the user in defining the scope of future steps to be taken to satisfy such obligations. In addition, a user may be concerned about business environmental risks or non-scope ASTM considerations that do not fall within the definition of a recognized environmental condition. This assessment also excludes subsurface or other invasive exploration, unless specifically documented herein. Users are also cautioned that Federal, State, Tribal and local laws may impose environmental assessment obligations that are beyond the scope of the ASTM E1527-21 practice.

The evaluation, opinion and conclusions presented herein are based solely on visual observations and regulatory, historical and personal knowledge that existed at the time our assessment was completed.

The use of the gathered information is exclusively for the purposes outlined in this report and only for the Site. Our firm can make no warranty, either express or implied, except that the services conducted were performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental assessment practices applicable at the time and location of the assessment and that the conclusions of the assessment have been based in part on professional judgment/experience, an interpretation of readily available data and the standard of care normally followed by similar professionals practicing in a similar locale and under similar circumstances. Any opinions presented cannot apply to Site changes, of which our firm is unaware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. In addition, this report cannot feasibly include any evaluation of undocumented activities at the Site or on adjacent or nearby properties. Lastly, a Phase I ESA meeting or exceeding this practice and completed less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of a given property or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction is presumed to be valid.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 160 of 465 ends

1529
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 3 of 28 ends

1.4 Special Terms and Conditions
This Phase I ESA was prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract/agreement for the work as executed between our firm and the client. There are no other special terms and conditions established between our firm and the client pertinent to the findings of this ESA or methodology used to complete this assessment. In addition, our firm has no final or other vested interest in the Site or adjacent/surrounding properties, or in any entity that owns or occupies the Site or adjacent/surrounding properties.

1.5 Limiting Conditions and Deviations
There were no significant limiting conditions that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions noted during the completion of this assessment. In addition, there were no deviations from the ASTM E1527-21 standard noted during the completion of this assessment. Any limiting conditions that are not considered to be ones that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions at the Site are referenced in applicable sections of this report.

1.6 Data Failure and Data Gaps
No instances of data failure were encountered during the completion of this assessment. In addition, no data gaps of significance (i.e., those that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions) were identified during the completion of this assessment. Any data gaps that are not considered to be ones that would inhibit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions at the Site are referenced in applicable sections of this report.

1.7 Reliance
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client (User) under a written agreement for completion of the assessment. This report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of both our firm and our client. The scope of services performed for this assessment may not be appropriate to satisfy the specific needs of other users, and any use or reuse of this document would be at the sole risk of said users. Any other party seeking liability protection under CERCLA must take independent action to accomplish its objective.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 161 of 465 ends

1530
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 4 of 28 ends

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Location and Legal Description
Location and legal description information is presented in the table below.

Location/Legal Consideration Details
Legal Physical Address 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California.

Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) San Diego County APN 238-360-68-00.

Property Size 6.28 acres.

General Orientation Relative to
Roadways or Other Landmarks
Generally north of Park Drive, south of Hamilton Lane, east of Bernardo Avenue and west of Our Country Road.

A Vicinity Map is included as Figure 1. A Site Plan is included as Figure 2.

2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics
The Site and the surrounding vicinity are situated in Escondido, California that consists primarily of residential properties, schools and public roadways. Additional details pertaining to the Site and its adjoining properties are provided in the sections below.

2.3 Current Use of the Site
The Site is vacant and undeveloped.

2.4 Description of Site Improvements
Information pertaining to improvements at the Site is presented in the table below.

Improvement Consideration Details
Access Point(s) Via Hamilton Lane to the north and via Bernardo Avenue to the west.

Primary Building(s) None.

Reported Framing N/A.

Building Exteriors N/A.

Reported Foundation N/A.

Other Improvements None known.

Utilities and Other Features None known.

2.5 Utilities
Utilities that are reported to be present at the Site or provide service in the surrounding area are noted below along with their municipal provider where applicable.

Utility Provider (Where Applicable)
Potable Water City of Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 162 of 465 ends

1531
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 5 of 28 ends

Utility Provider (Where Applicable)
Sewage Maintenance City of Escondido
Electrical San Diego Gas & Electric
Natural Gas San Diego Gas & Electric
Solid Waste Disposal Escondido Disposal, Inc.

2.6 Description of Adjoining Properties
Adjoining properties are defined as any real property or properties, the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject property of a Phase I ESA, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of a subject property but for a street, road or other public thoroughfare separating them. To the extent feasible, our firm performed a visual inspection of adjoining properties from the Site boundaries and along public rights-of-way. We did not encroach onto adjoining private property during the completion of this assessment. The following table identifies the adjoining property uses:

Direction Adjoining Property Use
North Hamilton Lane, then residential properties at 1050-1060 Hamilton Lane and 2331 and 2336 Rancho Diego Court.

South Residential properties at 950 Via Linda, 1044-1049 Park Drive, and 2436 Bernardo Avenue, and vacant land at 1076 Park Drive.

East Residential properties at 2411 and 2435 Our Country Road and 934 Via Linda.

West Bernardo Avenue, then residential properties at 2405 and 2435 Bernardo Avenue.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 163 of 465 ends

1532
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 6 of 28 ends

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING

3.1 Topography
General topographic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below.

Topographic Consideration Details
Topographic Map Reference Escondido, California 7.5-minute quadrangle.

Improvements or Features
Depicted on Map None.

Elevation Elevations range from approximately 635 to 660 feet above mean sea level.

Local/Regional Gradient Generally south.

Adjoining Improvements or
Features Depicted on Map Surrounding roads are depicted on the map.

3.2 Hydrology
General hydrologic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below.

Hydrologic Consideration Details
Hydrologic Unit Escondido Hydrologic Subarea of the Escondido Creek Hydrologic Area of the Carlsbad Hydrologic Unit.

Substantial Hydrologic
Features None identified.

Precipitation Infiltration
Potential Significant based on the lack of improvements.

Surface Water Flows Generally south.

Drainage from Nearby and
Adjoining Properties Insignificant.

3.3 Geology
General geologic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below.

Geologic Consideration Details
California Geomorphic
Province Peninsular Ranges.

Mapped Soils or Formation Cretaceous age tonalite and late-Pleistocene to Holocene age colluvial deposits.

Description of Soils or
Formation
Medium to fine-grained poorly-consolidated sands and silts as well as boulder outcrops.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 164 of 465 ends

1533
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 7 of 28 ends

3.4 Hydrogeology
General hydrogeologic information pertaining to the Site is presented in the table below.

Hydrogeologic
Consideration Details
Groundwater Basin or Unit Escondido Hydrologic Subarea of the Escondido Creek Hydrologic Area of the Carlsbad Hydrologic Unit.

Beneficial Uses Yes.

Estimated Depth to
Groundwater Greater than 50 feet below the surface.

Estimated Flow of
Groundwater Generally south.

Known Site or Regional
Groundwater Contamination
Issues
No issues resulting from the Site. The former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard is present over 700 feet to the northwest of the Site. This property was operated as a waste oil and solvent recycling and bulk petroleum facility beginning in the 1940s and continuing until 1981. Several remedial investigations and actions have been conducted at the property beginning in 1986. Soils inside the yard were found to be contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds and metals. Groundwater contamination was also found beneath the yard and outside of the limits of the property. The soils at the Yard are now considered stabilized. Surface water contamination migration was decreased by the remedial activities. Residual groundwater impacts are present with a portion of the plume mapped in the vicinity of the northeast portion of the Site. However, the impacts are considered to be delineated and results of a human health risk assessment indicated that the potential increase of risk for residents living outside the yard is negligible. In addition, it should be noted that a water supply well is present on the southern adjoining property of the Site and no impacts have been reported in this well. A potentially responsible party group is required to complete continued monitoring of groundwater in the area and any future mitigation that may be required should a change in conditions occur. As such, the former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition in connection with the Site.

3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration
According to online resources provided by the California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM), there are no oil, gas or geothermal wells located on the Site or its adjoining properties.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 165 of 465 ends

1534
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 8 of 28 ends

4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
A representative of the client (i.e., User) of this report was interviewed during the completion of this assessment. The questions posed during the interview are defined by the ASTM E1527-21 practice and were either conveyed verbally or by way of a written questionnaire. If a written questionnaire was completed by the user, a copy will be included in Appendix A of our Phase I ESA.

The user also provided our firm with any land title records and judicial records that may be available for the Site as part of the required evaluation for environmental liens and activity and use limitations (AULs) in connection with the subject property of a Phase I ESA. As stated in the ASTM E1527-21 practice, it is the responsibility of the user of the report to provide any available records pertaining to environmental liens and AULs that may exist in connection with a given property. Any land title and judicial records provided to our firm are discussed below. If such information is not discussed in the sections below, it was not provided by the user of the report.

In addition to the contact information obtained, the user of the report was also asked if they are aware of other useful documents that may exist and if so whether copies can be provided to the environmental professional within reasonable time and cost constraints. Typical useful documents are listed in Section 10.8.1 of the ASTM E1527-21 practice and include but are not limited to environmental assessment reports, compliance audits and permits, registrations for tank and other aboveground or underground systems, safety plans, spill prevention and other facility-related plans, geological/geotechnical studies and environmental governmental agency notices and/or correspondence.

4.1 Title Records
A Preliminary Title Report prepared by Chicago Title Company and dated effective August 13, 2020, was provided for review. No environmental liens or AULs are referenced in the report. Copies of the User provided documents are included in Appendix A. The User was also interviewed about the current status of title of the Site and there remain no known environmental liens or AULs in connection with the Site.

4.2 Environmental Liens
The User is unaware of environmental liens in connection with the Site.

4.3 Activity and Use Limitations
The User is unaware of AULs in connection with the Site.

4.4 Specialized or Actual Knowledge or Experience
The User is unaware of specialized knowledge, actual knowledge or experience that is material to recognized environmental conditions in direct connection with the Site.

4.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The User is unaware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community that is material to recognized environmental conditions in direct connection with the Site.

The User is aware of environmental impacts in the area that resulted from the nearby former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard property, but is unaware of any impact to the Site.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 166 of 465 ends

1535
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 9 of 28 ends

4.6 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
The User is unaware of information pertaining to an undervalued purchase price of the Site relative to the estimated fair market value of the Site due to the presence of contamination.

4.7 Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information
The Site is currently owned and managed by the Hamilton Bernardo LLC. The Site is vacant with no known occupants.

4.8 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
The User has commissioned this Phase I ESA as part of the planned development of the Site for residential purposes. The Phase I ESA is also being completed to assist the client in complying with 40 CFR Part 312.

4.9 Proceedings Involving the Site
The User is unaware of pending, threatened or past litigation and administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the Site. The client is also unaware of notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products in connection with the Site.

4.10 Other Provided Documents
No prior environmental reports were provided to our firm by the User during the completion of this assessment.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 167 of 465 ends

1536
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 10 of 28 ends

5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW
Our firm commissioned the preparation of a regulatory database report from Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) as part of the regulatory records review. Federal, State, Tribal, and local government environmental databases are searched. Certain databases are specifically required by the ASTM E1527-21 practice and are referenced as “standard ASTM regulatory databases.” Such databases are searched to at least the minimum search distance around a given property as defined in the practice. Other regulatory databases are also searched that are not specifically referenced in ASTM E1527-21. Such databases are referenced as “non-ASTM regulatory databases” and are searched within varying radii around a given property as selected by the database provider.

Descriptions of each database searched and the dates that the regulatory databases were last updated by the applicable agencies are included in the report. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available at the time of an update. Databases are updated in accordance with ASTM E1527-21, which states that government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public.

Our firm also reviewed unplottable sites listed in the database report by cross-referencing reasonably ascertainable information pertaining to such properties that may include facility names, street names, zip codes or other information. Unplottable sites are ones that cannot be formally mapped or geocoded due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. Any unplottable sites that we identify within the specified search radii have been evaluated as part of the preparation of this report. A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix B.

5.1 Standard ASTM Regulatory Database Search
The tables below present the standard Federal, State, Tribal and local ASTM databases that were searched, including the search distances from the Site. Below the tables are descriptions of any listings for the Site that may appear in the databases. Adjoining or nearby properties listed in databases indicative of releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products are also discussed, if in our professional opinion they have the potential to impact the Site. This practice of discussing only properties of anticipated environmental concern to the Site is noted in ASTM E1527-21, which states that the environmental professional may make statements applicable to multiple properties listed in regulatory databases that are not likely to have current or former releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products with the potential to migrate to a given subject property. Our professional judgment and opinions discussed herein are based on several factors including the nature of the regulatory database listings, distance of the off-site listed properties from the Site, orientation of the listed properties relative to the Site, interpreted direction of groundwater flow and/or regulatory case status information for the various properties as described in the databases.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 168 of 465 ends

1537
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 11 of 28 ends

The following Federal standard ASTM databases were searched:

Standard Environmental Record
Source Name Regulatory Database Identification Search Distance from Site (Miles) Lists of Federal National Priorities List
(NPL) (Superfund) sites
NPL – Proposed NPL – Superfund
Record of Decision (ROD) 1.0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Deleted NPL 1.0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
CERCLIS - SEMS – SEMS Archive –
ODI – IODI 0.5
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with No
Further Remedial Action Planned
(NFRAP)
CERCLIS NFRAP 0.5
Lists of Federal Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
RCRA CORRACTS – Department of
Energy (DOE) Formerly Utilized Sites
Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

1.0 Lists of Federal RCRA Treatment,
Storage and Disposal (TSD) facilities RCRA-TSDF 0.5
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA LQG – RCRA SQG – RCRA
VSQG – RCRA NON GEN – FEMA UST
– HIST GAS STATIONS – FRP –
DELISTED FRP – REFN – BULK

TERMINAL

0.25 Federal institutional control/engineering
control registries
LUCIS – FED ENG – FED INST – RCRA
CONTROLS – NPL IC 0.5
Federal Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) List ERNS Site
Lists of Federal brownfield sites FED BROWNFIELDS 0.5
Lists of sites with Federal
environmental liens CERCLIS LIENS – SEMS LIENS Site Only Site – The Site is not listed on the standard Federal ASTM regulatory databases.

Adjoining Properties – Adjoining properties are not listed on the standard Federal ASTM regulatory databases.

Other Properties – There are multiple listings pertaining to properties in the surrounding area that are identified on the SEMS, CERCLIS, RCRA SQG and RCRA NON GEN standard Federal ASTM databases. None of these listings are indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface that are considered to have the potential to significantly impact the Site.

The following State, Tribal, and local standard ASTM databases were searched:

Standard Environmental Record
Sources Name Regulatory Database Identification Search Distance from Site (Miles) Lists of state-and tribal “Superfund”
equivalent sites
RESPONSE – HWP 1.0
Lists of state-and tribal hazardous
waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR – DELISTED ENVS 1.0
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 169 of 465 ends

1538
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 12 of 28 ends

Standard Environmental Record
Sources Name Regulatory Database Identification Search Distance from Site (Miles) Lists of state and tribal landfills and
solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF – LDS – SWAT – WMUD –
SWRCB SWF – Construction and
Demolition (C & D) DEBRIS RECY –
CONTAINER RECY – RECYCLING –

PROCESSORS

0.5 Lists of state and tribal leaking storage
tanks
LUST – DELISTED LST – UST
CLOSURE – CLEANUP SITES –
DELISTED CLEANUP – INDIAN LUST –

DELISTED ILST

0.5 Lists of state and tribal registered
storage tanks
UST – HHSS – AST – AST SWRCB –
TANK OIL GAS – DELISTED TNK –
CERS TANK – DELISTED CTNK – HIST
TANK – UST SWEEPS – INDIAN UST –
DELISTED IUST – DELISTED COUNTY

0.25 State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
LUR – HLUR - DEED 0.5
Lists of state and tribal voluntary
cleanup sites
VCP 0.5
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites CALSITES 0.5 Local Agency Databases
SWF SANDIEGO – LOP SANDIEGO –
HAZ SANDIEGO – UST SANDIEGO –
SAM SANDIEGO – CERS HAZ
Site to 0.5
Site – The Site is not listed on the standard State, Tribal, and local ASTM regulatory databases.

Adjoining Properties – Adjoining properties are not listed on the standard State, Tribal, and local ASTM regulatory databases.

Other Properties – There are multiple listings pertaining to properties in the surrounding area that are identified on the RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, DELISTED LST, LUR, CALSITES, VCP, CLEANUP SITES, HAZ SANDIEGO and SAM SANDIEGO standard State, Tribal, and local ASTM databases.

None of these listings are indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface that are considered to have the potential to significantly impact the Site.

5.2 Non-ASTM Regulatory Database Search
Non-ASTM regulatory database listings are described below.

Site – The Site is not listed on the non-ASTM regulatory databases searched.

Adjoining and Surrounding Properties – Several surrounding properties are listed on various nonASTM databases and some of which are also listed on ASTM databases described above. Database listings include HWSS CLEANUP, SCH, HIST CORTESE, CERS HAZ and DELISTED HAZ. None of these listings are indicative of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products to the subsurface that are considered to have the potential to significantly impact the Site.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 170 of 465 ends

1539
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 13 of 28 ends

5.3 Regulatory Agency File Reviews
If a property being assessed under a Phase I ESA or any of the adjoining properties are identified on one or more of the above-referenced standard environmental record sources, pertinent regulatory files and/or records associated with such listings should be reviewed to assist the environmental professional in evaluating potential recognized environmental conditions. However, if in the environmental professional’s opinion, such a review is not warranted, file reviews need not be conducted if the environmental professional provides justification for not doing so.

Agency file reviews for the Site and select adjoining properties completed during this assessment (if deemed warranted) are noted below. If no adjoining properties are discussed, this indicates that the environmental professional did not require a review of any such records in order to provide a professional opinion regarding recognized environmental conditions. The agency inquiries were performed by way of on-line searches/queries of published databases and/or direct inquiries with public records clerks at one or more agencies. Dan Weis conducted the agency file reviews during the completion of this assessment. Copies of regulatory agency records are included in Appendix C.

Regulatory
Agency Jurisdiction
Date of
Inquiry or
Request
Contact
Response or
Information
from Agency
United States EPA
Envirofacts/ECHO/
TRIS
Federal 03/16/2025
Online
https://enviro.epa.gov/
https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility-search
https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventorytri-program No Records
Identified
California DTSC State 03/16/2025
Online
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public
https://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov/
No Records
Identified
State Water
Resources Control
Board/Regional
Water Quality
Control Board
State 03/16/2025
Online https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/historical
_ust_facilities
Records
Identified
County of San
Diego Department
of Environmental
Health (DEH)
Local 03/16/2025
Online
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/d
eh/doclibrary/
Public Records Clerk
No Records
Identified
City of Escondido Local 03/16/2025 Public Records Clerk No Records Identified
State Water Resources Control Board
There are no records pertaining to the Site in Water Board files. There are numerous documents in Water Board files pertaining to the former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard property, which is present over 700 feet to the northwest of the Site. As stated previously, this property is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition in connection with the Site.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 171 of 465 ends

1540
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 14 of 28 ends

6.0 HISTORICAL RESOURCE REVIEW
The objective of consulting historical sources is to develop a history of the previous uses of a property, its adjoining properties and the surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to recognized environmental conditions in connection with a given property. The goal of the historical research is to identify all obvious uses of a subject property from the present, back to the property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.

It is stated in ASTM E1527-21, the following standard historical resources shall be reviewed if, based on the judgment of the environmental professional, they are reasonably ascertainable, likely to be useful and applicable to the subject property: (1) aerial photographs (2) fire insurance maps (3) local street/city directories and (4) historical topographic maps. There are numerous other potential historical sources one can consider during a historical evaluation including zoning/land use records, property tax files records, building department records, miscellaneous maps, news articles, books about the history of an area being researched, imagery, land title records and a variety of other resources that may provide information about past land uses. These other resources may be found in sources such as prior assessments, newspaper archives, internet sites, community organizations, local libraries, historical societies, government agencies, from current owners or occupants of surrounding properties, or records in the files and/or personal knowledge of owners and/or occupants.

Relative to a final decision on which sources are to be consulted, under ASTM E1527-21, the environmental professional is afforded the ability to exercise professional judgment and consider the possible releases that might have occurred at a property, adjoining properties and surrounding area in light of the historical uses and, in concert with other relevant information gathered as part of the Phase I process, use this information to assist in selecting historical resources that will be beneficial in identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property.

Historical resources reviewed during the completion of this assessment are referenced below. This may include those obtained from prior Phase I ESA reports pertaining to the Site. It is stated in ASTM E1527-21 that environmental professionals may use information in prior environmental reports provided such information was generated as a result of procedures that meet or exceed the requirements of the current practice.

If certain potential sources of information noted above are not referenced in the sections below, they were not deemed necessary by the environmental professional in order to meet the objective of the historical research consultation. Copies of historical resources are included in Appendix D. If any historical resources are not included as appendices, it is due to copyright considerations precluding us from such reproduction.

6.1 Aerial Photographs
We reviewed historical aerial photographs from the years ranging from 1939 through 2024 provided by ERIS. The table below presents the results of the photograph review.

Photograph Year Site Observations Adjoining Property Observations 1939-1967 Vacant land and agricultural. Roadways, residential properties, agricultural activity and vacant land.
1974-2024 Vacant land.

Roadways, residential properties, agricultural
activity and vacant land. Increased residential
development is evident over the decades.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 172 of 465 ends

1541
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 15 of 28 ends

As stated above, the Site has historically been used for agricultural purposes. During historical agricultural activities throughout the State of California, various pesticides and more specifically organochlorine pesticides were commonly applied during the normal course of agricultural operations.

Such compounds have since been banned from production and use in the United States. Based on the regulatory and historical research completed during the preparation of this assessment, no information has been revealed that would lead us to believe that an accidental spill or release of pesticide products has occurred at the Site. As such, the historical agricultural use of the Site is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition in connection with the Site. Furthermore, as the Site will be developed in the future which commonly includes grading (soil mixing) of the upper several feet of soil, it is likely that any residual agricultural chemicals, if present, will be homogenized and redistributed and thereby reducing concentrations if present to begin with.

6.2 Topographic Maps
We reviewed historical topographic maps from the years ranging from 1893 through 2022 provided by ERIS. No discernable features are depicted on-Site on the maps. Scattered residences are depicted on adjoining and surrounding properties. Roadways are also depicted.

6.3 Other Historical Sources
Other historical sources are referenced in the ASTM E1527-21 practice as any source or sources other than the standard historical sources referenced in the practice that are credible to a reasonable person and that identify past uses of a subject property. This category includes, but is not limited to miscellaneous maps and directories, newspaper archives, internet sites, community organizations, local libraries, historical societies, current owners or occupants of neighboring properties, or records in the files and/or personal knowledge of the property owner and/or occupants. No historical sources other than the standard sources described above were deemed necessary and useful to assist in identifying recognized environmental conditions.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 173 of 465 ends

1542
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 16 of 28 ends

7.0 SITE RECONAISSANCE
The objective of the Site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with a subject property. The Site visit for our assessment was completed on March 19, 2025. We were unaccompanied during the reconnaissance.

7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The Site reconnaissance consisted of observing the Site on foot walking the periphery of the Site, various transects throughout the Site, and publicly accessible areas surrounding the Site for viewing from accessible adjacent public thoroughfares. If structures are present, the periphery of structures are visually and/or physically observed along with building interiors. Adjoining properties and the surrounding area were also observed during observation of the periphery of the Site, from public thoroughfares adjacent to or traveled on the way to the Site, and if applicable from buildings and structures otherwise accessed during the inspection. No significant limiting conditions of the Site inspection were noted. Select photographs of the Site obtained during the Site reconnaissance are included in Appendix E.

7.2 Current General Site and Vicinity Characteristics
The Site and the surrounding vicinity are situated in Escondido, California that consists primarily of residential properties, schools and public roadways. The Site is vacant and undeveloped.

7.3 Indications of Past Site and Vicinity Uses
There are no material differences between the current and past uses of the Site, adjoining properties, and the surrounding area that were visually and/or physically observed during the Site reconnaissance that pertain to recognized environmental conditions.

7.4 Site-Specific Observations
We examined the Site for the features and conditions noted in the table below.

Feature or Condition Details
Drains and Sumps None observed.

Drums, Totes, and
Intermediate Bulk
Containers
None observed.

Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products in
Connection with Identified
Uses
None observed.

Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products Not in
Connection with Identified
Uses
None observed.

Heating/Cooling None observed.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 174 of 465 ends

1543
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 17 of 28 ends

Feature or Condition Details
PCB Containing Items
Pole-mounted electrical transformers are present along certain Site boundaries, The transformers are utility owned and no staining, odors or other suspect conditions were noted.

Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons None observed.

Potable Water
Supply/Source
None observed. The City of Escondido provides potable water to the surrounding area.

Roads None observed.

Septic Systems or
Cesspools. None observed.

Sewage Disposal System None observed. The City of Escondido provides sewage disposal for the surrounding area.

Solid Waste (including
graded areas and non-native
fill)
One open-top container filled with discarded fencing and other miscellaneous metal materials was observed. Landscape waste is also present throughout portions of the Site. No staining, odors or other suspect conditions were noted.

Please refer to any project geotechnical reports for information regarding the potential presence of fill material at the Site.

Stained Soil or Pavement None observed.

Stains or Corrosion on
Floors, Walls, or Ceilings
(except for staining from
water).

None observed.

Standing Surface Water and
Pools or Sumps Contain
Liquids
None observed.

Storage Tanks None observed.

Stressed Vegetation (other
than water stress).

None observed.

Strong, Pungent, or Noxious
Odors and Their Sources None noted.

Structures and Other
Improvements None observed.

Water/Wastewater or other
liquid (including stormwater) None observed.

Wells None observed.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 175 of 465 ends

1544
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 18 of 28 ends

8.0 INTERVIEWS
People interviewed during the completion of this assessment (with the exception of public records clerks at regulatory agencies) are noted in the table below. Such agency contacts are referenced in Section 5.3 of this report. In the event that case workers or other specific staff at regulatory agencies who are currently, historically or will be actively involved in the future with oversight of environmental work at the Site or adjoining properties of interest are interviewed, their contact information is included in the table below.

Name Title or Role of
Contact
Organization or
Affiliation
Date of Inquiry or
Request
Date Information
was Provided
Lee Duran Managing Member Hamilton Bernardo
LLC
March 11, 2025
(Questionnaire) March 11, 2025
Descriptions of the information obtained from the interviews are included in the sections below.

Dan Weis conducted the interviews during the completion of this assessment. If written questionnaires were completed by one or more of the parties, they are included in Appendix F of our Phase I ESA report. If questionnaires are not included, the interviews were conducted verbally.

8.1 Site Owner
The Site owner is unaware of environmental concerns in direct connection with the Site. The Site owner is aware of environmental impacts in the area that resulted from the nearby former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard property, but is unaware of any impact to the Site.

8.2 Key Site Manager
The Site owner is also considered to be the Key Site Manager. Please refer to Section 8.1 above.

8.3 Current Occupants
The Site is vacant with no current occupants.

8.4 Local Government Official
Public records requests were completed by our firm as described in Section 5.3. No formal interviews with other personnel at agencies were deemed warranted during the preparation of our Phase I ESA.

8.5 Other Parties
Interviews with other people were not conducted during the preparation of this assessment. As stated in the ASTM E1527-21 practice, interviews with past owners, operators and occupants of a subject property who are likely to have material information regarding the potential for contamination at a given property shall be conducted to the extent that they have been identified and that the information likely to be obtained is not duplicative of information already obtained from other sources. Interviews with people with past association with the Site were not deemed warranted during the completion of this assessment. In addition, for abandoned properties where there is evidence of potential unauthorized uses of the abandoned property or evidence of uncontrolled access to the abandoned property, interviews with one or more owners or occupants of neighboring adjoining properties or nearby Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 176 of 465 ends

1545
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 19 of 28 ends

properties should be conducted. Neither the Site nor its adjoining properties are considered to fall within these criteria.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 177 of 465 ends

1546
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 20 of 28 ends

9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES – NON-SCOPE ASTM CONSIDERATIONS Several non-scope ASTM considerations are referenced in the ASTM E1527-21 practice that a user of a report may wish to evaluate. Listed considerations in the practice include asbestos-containing building materials, biological agents, cultural and historic resources, ecological resources, endangered species, health and safety, indoor air quality (unrelated to releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the environment), industrial hygiene, lead-based paint (unrelated to releases into the environment), lead in drinking water, mold or microbial growth conditions, PCB-containing building materials, naturally-occurring radon, regulatory compliance, wetlands and substances not defined as hazardous substances (including some substances sometimes generally referred to as emerging contaminants) unless or until such substances are classified as a CERCLA hazardous substance.

No implication is intended by the practice as to the relative importance of inquiry into such non-scope considerations, and the list of considerations is not intended to be all-inclusive. An evaluation of one or more of the non-scope considerations was not requested of our firm as part of the scope of services for the assessment. Therefore, no findings, opinions and conclusions of this assessment are based on said non-scope ASTM considerations.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 178 of 465 ends

1547
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 21 of 28 ends

10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS
No features, activities, uses and/or conditions that, in our professional judgment, may indicate the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products that have significantly impacted the Site were identified during the completion of this assessment.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 179 of 465 ends

1548
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 22 of 28 ends

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International Practice E1527-21 of the property located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California. This assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions or controlled recognized environmental conditions in direct connection with the Site. In addition, no significant data gaps were identified during the completion of this assessment. No additional assessment at the Site is considered to be warranted at this time.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 180 of 465 ends

1549
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 23 of 28 ends

12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the Site. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Qualifications of personnel involved with the completion of this report are included in Appendix G.

Daniel Weis, R.E.H.S.

Environmental Manager
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 181 of 465 ends

1550
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 24 of 28 ends

13.0 ASSUMPTIONS
No Phase I ESA effort can eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions to exist in connection with a given property. Performance of the ASTM E1527-21 practice may reduce such uncertainty but in no way should the findings and report be misconstrued as insurance or a guarantee regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a given property. The ASTM E1527-21 practice recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost relative to the completion of a Phase I ESA.

During the completion of this ESA, our firm relied on certain information obtained from secondary sources, including but not limited to the user of the report, government agencies, historical research business entities, environmental databases and interviews with one or more persons. The sources obtained and/or consulted are assumed to be reliable. However, our firm cannot warranty or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is wholly accurate or complete. Our firm is not responsible for any misrepresentations or false statements that may be provided by others or the lack of pertinent/relevant information that should have been provided/disclosed by others, and we assume no responsibility for any consequence as a result of such omissions or withheld information.

Accuracy and completeness of records varies among information sources, including from governmental agencies. As a result, there is a possibility that even with the proper application of the methodologies presented in ASTM E1527-21, conditions may exist that could not be identified within the scope of this assessment, or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information.

In addition, any responses received from Federal, State, Tribal and local regulatory agency secondary sources of information after the issuance of this report may change certain findings and conclusions of this report.

Estimations and opinions regarding the potential for off-site properties to adversely impact a given subject property is one of the key components of a Phase I ESA. In most cases, recent property-specific or adjacent-property specific measured groundwater data or other hydrogeological information is not reasonably ascertainable. In the absence of such data, reasonable assumptions regarding the depth and flow of groundwater are made based on various sources including comparisons to surface elevations, land topography and available hydrogeological on the State of California GeoTracker database. In addition, estimations and opinions regarding potential impacts from off-site locations may be based on certain assumptions that a hazardous substance or petroleum product may not migrate laterally within unsaturated soil for a substantial distance and that contaminants that have reached saturated soil and groundwater may attenuate over time and/or may decrease in concentration relative to distance from its source. While any interpretations presented herein may be effective in reducing uncertainty regarding potential impacts to a subject property from off-site locations, in no way should the findings and report be misconstrued as insurance or a guarantee regarding the potential for such impacts to occur. Greater certainty regarding subsurface conditions at a given property can only be achieved by way of a subsurface sampling effort of one or more media.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 182 of 465 ends

1551
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 25 of 28 ends

14.0 DEFINITIONS
Definitions of key terminology relevant to the ASTM E1527-21 practice are presented below.

Recognized Environmental Condition – (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.

Historical Recognized Environmental Condition – A previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting a property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting a property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).

Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition – A recognized environmental condition affecting a property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of an applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).

All Appropriate Inquiries – That inquiry constituting all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of a property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined in CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(35)(B) and 40 C.F.R. Part 312, that will qualify a party to a commercial real estate transaction for one of the threshold criteria for satisfying the LLPs to CERCLA liability (42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35)(A) & (B), § 9607(b)(3), § 9607(q), and § 9607(r)), assuming compliance with other elements of the defense.

Data Failure – A failure to achieve the historical research objective as outlined in the ASTM E1527- 21 practice even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Data failure is one type of data gap. The research objective is compiling and analyzing historical property information and developing a history of the previous uses of a property, adjoining properties and surrounding area to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property.

Data Gap – A lack of or inability to obtain information required by the ASTM E1527-21 practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by the ASTM E1527-21 practice, including, but not limited to site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct a site visit) and interviews (for example, an inability to interview a key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). Data gaps are only considered to be significant if they affect the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions.

De Minimis Condition – A condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.

Engineering Controls – Physical modifications to a site or facility (for example, capping, slurry walls, or point of use water treatment) to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on a property. Engineering controls are a type of AUL.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 183 of 465 ends

1552
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 26 of 28 ends

Environment – (A) the navigable waters, the waters of the contiguous zone and the ocean waters of which the natural resources are under the exclusive management authority of the United States under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act [16 U.S.C. §§ 1801 et seq.], and (B) any other surface water, groundwater, drinking water supply, land surface or subsurface strata, or ambient air within the United States or under the jurisdiction of the United States.

Good Faith – The absence of any intention to seek an unfair advantage or to defraud another party; an honest and sincere intention to fulfill one’s obligations in the conduct or transaction concerned.

Hazardous Substance – (A) any substance designated pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(2)(A)], (B) any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to section 9602 of this title, (C) any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 U.S.C. 6921] (but not including any waste the regulation of which under the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.] has been suspended by Act of Congress), (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1317(a)], (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [ 42 U.S.C. 7412 ] and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the administrator has taken action pursuant to section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act [15 U.S.C. 2606]. The term does not include petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) of this paragraph, and the term does not include natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).

Institutional Controls – A legal or administrative mechanism (for example, deed restrictions, restrictive covenants, easements, or zoning) on the use of, or access to, a site or facility to (1) reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on a property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. An institutional control is a type of AUL.

Petroleum Exclusion – While the definition of a CERCLA hazardous substance specifically excludes petroleum products and crude oil, the EPA has determined that the petroleum exclusion applies to petroleum products such as gasoline and other fuels containing lead, benzene or other hazardous substances that are normally added during the refining process. Notwithstanding the existence of the petroleum exclusion, petroleum products are included within the scope of the ASTM E1527-21 practice for multiple reasons. Petroleum products have historically been widely used at commercial properties. In addition, other federal and state laws may impose liability for releases or spills of petroleum products.

Petroleum Products – Those substances included within the meaning of the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and EPA, that is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). The word fraction refers to certain distillates of crude oil, including gasoline, kerosine, diesel oil, jet fuels and fuel oil.

Reasonably Ascertainable Information – Information that is (1) publicly available, (2) obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints and (3) practically reviewable.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 184 of 465 ends

1553
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 27 of 28 ends

Release or Threatened Release – Any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping or disposing into the environment (including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers and other closed receptacles containing any hazardous substance, or pollutant or contaminant).

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 185 of 465 ends

1554
Item8.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment April 22, 2025
1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California

Page 28 of 28 ends

15.0 REFERENCES
Sources of information consulted during the completion of our Phase I ESA are noted in the sections below.

15.1 Documents, Plans and Reports
x “All Appropriate Inquiry” as necessary to satisfy the defenses available under 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(b)(3), 9607(r)(1), and 9607(q), relying on definitions provided at 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35)(B); and as further explained in 40 CFR §§ 312.1 – 312.31. x ASTM International, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," ASTM Designation E 1527-21, 2021. x California Geological Survey, 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces Note 36, Electronic Copy, Revised December.
x California State Water Resources Control Board, Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9), Published 2014.
x ERIS Database Report.
x ERIS Historic Aerials.
x ERIS Topographic Maps.
x USGS topographic map, Escondido, California Quadrangle.

15.2 Personal Communications
x Designated Client Representative – Mr. Lee Duran
x Designated Site Owner Representative – Mr. Lee Duran
x Key Site Manager – Mr. Lee Duran
x Site Occupant – None
x Public Records Clerk – County of San Diego

15.3 Agencies Consulted
x California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) x California Department of Toxic Substances Control
x California State Water Resources Control Board
x City of Escondido
x County of San Diego
x United States EPA
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 186 of 465 ends

1555
Item8.

FIGURES
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 187 of 465 ends

1556
Item8.

FIGURE 1

VICINITY MAP
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 188 of 465 ends

1557
Item8.

Prepared by:

Weis Environmental
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SITE
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 189 of 465 ends

1558
Item8.

FIGURE 2

SITE PLAN
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 190 of 465 ends

1559
Item8.

Prepared by:

Weis Environmental
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Figure 2 - Site Plan
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
SITE
Vacant Land
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Vacant Land
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 191 of 465 ends

1560
Item8.

FIGURE 3

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 192 of 465 ends

1561
Item8.

Prepared by:

Weis Environmental
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Figure 3 - Topographic Map
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
SITE
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 193 of 465 ends

1562
Item8.

APPENDICES
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 194 of 465 ends

1563
Item8.

APPENDIX A

USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 195 of 465 ends

1564
Item8.

CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 1 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246

PRELIMINARY REPORT
Order No.: 73720006246-PM
Property: Hamilton Lane
Escondido, CA 92025
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms.

The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One.

Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report.

This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.

The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation.

Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered.

It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land.

Chicago Title Insurance Company
Countersigned By:

Authorized Officer or Agent
By:

President
Attest:

Secretary
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 196 of 465 ends

1565
Item8.

CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 2 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246
Visit Us on our Website: www.ctic.com
ISSUING OFFICE: 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92108 FOR SETTLEMENT INQUIRIES, CONTACT:

Great Pacific Escrow
6105 Paseo Delicias, Suite 3 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067
(858)756-1704 FAX (858)224-1535

PRELIMINARY REPORT
Title Officer: Patty Meredith
Email: [email protected];
[email protected]
Phone No.: (619)521-3449
Fax No.: (619)209-3494
Title No.: 73720006246-PM
Escrow Officer: Julie Wood
Email: [email protected]
Phone No.: (858)756-1704
Fax No.: (858)946-3020
Escrow No.: 3848-JW
PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES): Hamilton Lane, Escondido, CA
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 13, 2020 at 07:30 AM
The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is:

CLTA Standard Coverage Policy 1990 (04-08-14)
ALTA Loan Policy 2006

1. The estate or interest in the Land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is:

A Fee

2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:

Jennings Development LLC, an undivided 2/3 interest and Jennings Family Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership, an undivided 1/3 interest, as tenants in common

3. The Land referred to in this Report is described as follows:

SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 197 of 465 ends

1566
Item8.

EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 3 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246
For APN/Parcel ID(s): 238-360-68-00
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13268, IN THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 10, 1984.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 198 of 465 ends

1567
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 4 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246

AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2020-2021.

2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, are paid. For proration purposes the amounts were:

Tax Identification No.: 238-360-68-00
Fiscal Year: 2019-2020
1st Installment: $5,569.33
2nd Installment: $5,569.33
Exemption: None
Code Area: 04327

3. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy.

4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records.

5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document:

Granted to: Effie Dunton Eison
Purpose: pipelines
Recording Date: June 25, 1920
Recording No.: Book 806, page 488 of Deeds
Affects: the exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record.

6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document:

Granted to: San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Purpose: public utilities and incidental purposes
Recording Date: December 31, 1934
Recording No.: Book 364, page 303 Official Records
Affects: the route thereof affects a portion of said land and is more fully described in said document.

7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document:

Granted to: San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Purpose: public utilities and incidental purposes
Recording Date: July 6, 1937
Recording No.: Book 670, page 116 Official Records
Affects: the route thereof affects a portion of said land and is more fully described in said document.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 199 of 465 ends

1568
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM

EXCEPTIONS
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 5 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246

8. Matters contained in that certain document
Entitled: Covenant of Improvement Requirements
Recording Date: May 9, 1984
Recording No.: File No. 84-172176 Official Records
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.

9. Requirements relative to improvement and development and the necessary approvals thereof, as contained on Parcel Map No. 13268.

10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat;
Purpose: public roadway
Affects: as shown on said map
Recording No.: Parcel Map No. 13268
Said instrument additionally contains the privilege and right to extend structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits where required for the construction and maintenance thereof.

11. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: $150,000.00
Dated: January 10, 2017
Trustor/Grantor Jennings Family Limited Partnership
Trustee: Chicago Title Company, a California Corporation Beneficiary: C. J. Redwood Inc., a California Corporation Loan No.: Not Shown
Recording Date: January 20, 2017
Recording No.: 2017-0031767, Official Records
Said deed of trust contains an erroneous legal description.

12. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of, said Land, which rights are not disclosed by the Public Records.

13. Any rights, interests or claims, which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 200 of 465 ends

1569
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM

EXCEPTIONS
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 6 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246

14. In order to complete this report, the Company requires a Statement of Information to be completed by the following party(s),
Party(s): Seller: principals of LP and LLC
The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Statement of Information.

NOTE: The Statement of Information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed Statement of Information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the Statement of Information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file.

15. In order to complete this report, the Company requires a Statement of Information to be completed by the following party(ies),
Party(ies): Buyers
The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Statement of Information.

END OF EXCEPTIONS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 201 of 465 ends

1570
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 7 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246 =
NOTES
Note 1. Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities.

Note 2. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14- point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described.

Note 3. Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report.

Note 4. If there are recorder office closures related to COVID-19, we may be temporarily unable to record/access documents in the normal course of business. As such, we will require our AFFIDAVIT OF UNDERSTANDING AND INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT DUE TO CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC to be signed by all parties.

Note 5. The Company and its policy issuing agents are required by Federal law to collect additional information about certain transactions in specified geographic areas in accordance with the Bank Secrecy Act. If this transaction is required to be reported under a Geographic Targeting Order issued by FinCEN, the Company or its policy issuing agent must be supplied with a completed ALTA Information Collection Form ("ICF") prior to closing the transaction contemplated herein.

Note 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder.

Note 7. A Preliminary Change of Ownership form is required upon a change in ownership of the Land. Section 480 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California requires that a grantee of real property complete a Preliminary Change of Ownership statement, which is to be filed at the time that a grant deed is recorded. In the event that the statement is not completed and presented at the time of the recording of the deed, the County Recorder will assess the grantee an additional charge to record the deed. In addition to the additional charge at the time of recording, the County Assessor may assess additional fees and penalties for failure to file the Ownership Statement within the required time.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 202 of 465 ends

1571
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM
NOTES
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 8 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246 =
Note 8. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, the Company will require the following for the below-named limited partnership:

Name: Jennings Family Limited Partnership
a. Certificate of Limited Partnership filed with the Secretary of State, in compliance with the provision of the California Revised Limited Partnership Act, Section 15611 et. seq., Corporations Code. b. Certified Copy of the Certificate of Limited Partnership certified by the Secretary of State filed with the County Recorder.

The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation
Note 9. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below.

Limited Liability Company: Jennings Development LLC
a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto with the appropriate filing stamps.
c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
d. A current dated certificate of good standing from the proper governmental authority of the state in which the entity was created
e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing.
f) If Limited Liability Company is a Single Member Entity, a Statement of Information for the Single Member will be required.
g) Each member and manager of the LLC without an Operating Agreement must execute in the presence of a notary public the Certificate of California LLC (Without an Operating Agreement) Status and Authority form
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 203 of 465 ends

1572
Item8.

Title No.: 73720006246-PM
NOTES
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (Adopted: 11.17.2006) Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM 9 CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-SPS-1-20-73720006246 =
Note 10. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below.

Limited Liability Company: CRJ Management LLC (general partner - Jennings Family LP) a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto with the appropriate filing stamps.
c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
d. A current dated certificate of good standing from the proper governmental authority of the state in which the entity was created
e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing.
f) If Limited Liability Company is a Single Member Entity, a Statement of Information for the Single Member will be required.
g) Each member and manager of the LLC without an Operating Agreement must execute in the presence of a notary public the Certificate of California LLC (Without an Operating Agreement) Status and Authority form
Note 11. The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance.

Note 12. Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report.

END OF NOTES
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 204 of 465 ends

1573
Item8.

Wire Fraud Alert
Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017
Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 73720006246-FC - WIRE0016 (DSI Rev. 12/07/17) TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved

WIRE FRAUD ALERT
This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice.

If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer.

All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds.

In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud.

NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction.

ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster.

USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols.

Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts.

USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature.

For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links:

Federal Bureau of Investigation: Internet Crime Complaint Center:
http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 205 of 465 ends

1574
Item8.

Privacy Statement Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM by
SCA0002565_CTLA.doc CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-73720006246

FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL

PRIVACY NOTICE
Effective April 9, 2020
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information.

A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply.

Collection of Personal Information
FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information:
contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g. Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number);
financial account information (e.g. loan or bank account information); and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you.

We may collect Personal Information about you from:
information we receive from you or your agent;
information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others.

Collection of Browsing Information
FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device:

Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system;
browser version, language, and type;
domain name system requests; and
browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website.

Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account.

Other Online Specifics
Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive.

Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 206 of 465 ends

1575
Item8.

Privacy Statement Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM by
SCA0002565_CTLA.doc CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-73720006246 Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites.

Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser.

Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit.

Use of Personal Information
FNF uses Personal Information for three main purposes:

To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you.

To improve our products and services.

To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently.

When Information Is Disclosed
We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances:
to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to nonaffiliated third party service providers with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or
in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public.

The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We may share your Personal Information with affiliates (other companies owned by FNF) to directly market to you. Please see "Choices with Your Information" to learn how to restrict that sharing.

We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings.

Security of Your Information
We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information.

Choices With Your Information
If you do not want FNF to share your information among our affiliates to directly market to you, you may send an "opt out" request by email, phone, or physical mail as directed at the end of this Privacy Notice. We do not share your Personal Information with nonaffiliates for their use to direct market to you without your consent.

Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 207 of 465 ends

1576
Item8.

Privacy Statement Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM by
SCA0002565_CTLA.doc CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-73720006246 For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (https://fnf.com/pages/californiaprivacy.aspx) or call (888) 413-1748.

For Nevada Residents: You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling (888) 934-3354 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. Nevada law requires that we also provide you with the following contact information: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: [email protected].

For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes.

For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures.

Information From Children
The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian.

International Users
FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice.

FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans
Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public.

Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes; Use of Comments or Feedback By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. We may use comments or feedback that you submit to us in any manner without notice or compensation to you.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 208 of 465 ends

1577
Item8.

Privacy Statement Printed: 08.18.20 @ 10:36 PM by
SCA0002565_CTLA.doc CA-CT-FWDO-02180.055820-73720006246 Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us
If you have questions, would like to correct your Personal Information, or want to opt-out of information sharing for affiliate marketing, send your requests to [email protected], by phone to (888) 934-3354, or by mail to:

Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Avenue,
Jacksonville, Florida 32204
Attn: Chief Privacy Officer
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 209 of 465 ends

1578
Item8.

ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (05/06/16)

CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.

2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.

3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy.

4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated.

5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law.

6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:

1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.

3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records.

4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.

5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records.

6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the public records.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

Page 210 of 465 ends

Escondido City CouncilJune 10, 2026

Escondido City Council
June 10, 2026