EXETER CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
September 22, 2026, 6:30 PM
City Hall, 137 North F Street
Exeter, California 93221
Mayor
Jacob Johnson
Mayor Pro Tem
Jeff Wilson
Council Members
Vicki Riddle
Frankie Alves
Bobby Lentz
Notice is hereby given that the Exeter City Council will hold a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in person at Exeter City Hall located at 137 N. F St. in Exeter California, 93221.
Staff Reports related to items on the agenda are available on the City’s website at https://cityofexeter.ca.gov/ and available for viewing at City Hall. 6:30 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER CLOSED SESSION
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING CLOSED SESSION MATTERS
Comments from the public are limited to items listed on the closed session matters (GC 54954.3a). Speakers will be allowed three (3) minutes. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your City of residence.
C. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION(S)
1. GC 54956.9(d)(2) – Conference with Legal Counsel
Re: Exposure to Litigation – One (1) Case (facts not known to potential plaintiffs)
2. GC 54956.9 – Consideration of Liability Claims
Claimant: Morri Lee Burris Mendez
Claimed Against: City of Exeter
3. GC 54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiations
Agency Negotiator: Jason Ridenour and Julia Lew
Employee Groups: CLOCEA
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
7:00 p.m.
D. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION
E. INVOCATION
F. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters that are not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of the Exeter City Council. In compliance with public meeting laws, Council cannot discuss topics that are not included on the published agenda. This is also the time for citizens to comment on items listed on the Consent Calendar or to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes. Public comments related to all pulled Consent Calendar Items and all Individual Business or Public Hearing Items that are listed on this agenda will be heard at the time that item is discussed or at a time the Public Hearing is opened for comment.
In fairness to all who wish to speak tonight, comments shall be limited to five (5) minutes for each individual, ten (10) minutes for an individual representing a group, and thirty (30) minutes overall for the entire public comment period, unless otherwise indicated by the Mayor. Although not required, speakers are asked to begin their comments by stating their name and city of residence.
H. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation in Honor of Constitution Week (p.5)
Presented by Mayor Johnson
2. Employee of the Quarter Recognition of Jasper McCool (p.6-7) Presented by Jason Ridenour, City Administrator
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.
1. Approval of September 8, 2026, Regular Meeting Minutes (pp.8-12)
2. Approval of the Payment of Bills for September 4, 2026, and September 8, 2026 (pp.13- 27)
3. Approval of Payroll for the Period August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026 (pp.28- 35)
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
4. Approval of a Request from the Fall Festival Committee to Display a Banner Across Pine Street for the 2026 Exeter Fall Festival (pp.36-39)
5. Review and Acceptance of the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for August 2026 (pp.40-42)
6. Authorize Payment to Mid Valley Disposal (MVD) in the Amount of $13,808.25 for the City's 2026 Compost Procurement in Satisfaction of the Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) Organic Waste Procurement Target (pp.43-71)
7. Authorize the Purchase of One (1) Commercial Chemical Sprayer Trailer from California Turf Equipment & Supply, Inc. (Cal Turf) for Vegetation and Weed Management in an Amount Not to Exceed $14,072.49 (pp.72-76)
8. Authorize the City Administrator (or Designee) to Execute a Renewed Proof of Designation (POD) with Community Services Employment Training (CSET) for Continued Electronic Waste Collection Services in the City of Exeter (pp.77-79) J. INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS ITEMS
Comments related to Individual Business and Public Hearing Items are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, for a maximum of 30 minutes per item. The Mayor may reasonably limit or extend the public comment period to preserve the Council's interest in conducting efficient, orderly meetings.
1. Authorize a Sole-Source Purchase from Telstar Instruments (Telstar) to Furnish, Install, Configure, and Commission Two (2) Mission SCADA Pressure Monitoring Stations for the City’s Water-Distribution System in an Amount Not to Exceed $27,072.00 (pp.80-88) Presented by Zachary Boudreaux, Public Works Director
K. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS OF INTEREST
L. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
M. REGULAR MEETING ADJOURNMENT
State of California )
County of Tulare ) ss.
City of Exeter )
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Exeter, in the Administrator’s Office; and that I posted this Agenda on the bulletin board outside of City Hall 137 N. F St. Exeter CA 93221 on September 18, 2026, and online on the City of Exeter website. _______________________________________________
Christina Arias, Deputy City Clerk
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the California Ralph M. Brown Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, or to be able to access this agenda and documents in the agenda packet, please contact the City Clerk (559)592-9244. Notification prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting and/or provision of an appropriate alternative format of the agenda and documents in the agenda packet. (28 CFR 35.102-35. 104 ADA Title II).
Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the legislative body after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at City of Exeter, Administration Office 100 N. C St., Exeter CA 93221 during normal business hours.
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Proclamation
IN HONOR OF CONSTITUTION WEEK FOR YEAR 2026
WHEREAS, September 17, 2026, marks the 239th anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to afford official recognition to this important document and its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations which commemorate the occasion; and
WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution week.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Jacob Johnson, Mayor of the City of Exeter, California, do hereby proclaim September 17 through 23, 2026 as
CONSTITUTION WEEK
in the City of Exeter, California, and ask our residents to reaffirm the ideals of the Framers of the Constitution by vigilantly protecting the freedoms guaranteed to us through this valuable founding document.
DATED: September 22, 2026
Jacob Johnson, Mayor
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Office of the Mayor
Address: PO Box 237, Exeter, CA 93221
Phone: (559)592-9244
City of Exeter Employee of the Quarter
Skilled Maintenance Technician Jasper McCool
Jasper joined the City of Exeter on April 1, 2026, as a member of the Landscape Maintenance crew within the Public Works Department. In recognition of his strong performance and dedication, he was promoted to Skilled Maintenance Worker in August of 2026. Since joining the team, Jasper has proven to be a fast learner, a hard worker, and a positive addition to the team.
Since starting with the City, Jasper has developed a strong understanding of landscape maintenance operations, including irrigation system upkeep, turf and tree care, and the equipment and tools needed to maintain the City’s parks and Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District areas. His willingness to learn new tasks and take direction has allowed him to take on increasing levels of responsibility within the department. Along with his new position’s duties, he acts as an advisor to the landscape crew on technique, pace, and tactics.
Jasper consistently goes above and beyond what is expected of him. He arrives each day ready to work, takes initiative on tasks without being asked, and is always willing to lend a hand wherever it is needed most. His strong work ethic and dependability were key factors in his promotion. His work ethic and attention to detail have been paramount in bringing the City’s landscape maintenance operations to their current level of success.
Beyond his technical skills, Jasper brings a great attitude to the job every day. He works well with his fellow crew members, is respectful and professional with the public, and has become a valued and reliable member of the Public Works team.
We are incredibly proud and appreciative of Jasper’s dedication, work ethic, and positive attitude. His commitment to excellence and to supporting his team exemplifies the qualities of an outstanding employee.
Congratulations, Jasper, on being named Employee of the Quarter! September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Jasper McCool
EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER
This certificate is proudly presented to : MAYOR PRO TEM WILSON In recognition of your outstanding dedication, strong work ethic, and commitment to excellence in service to the City of Exeter. Since joining the Public Works Department, your initiative, dependability, willingness to learn, and attention to detail have made a positive impact on the City’s landscape maintenance operations. Your readiness to take on new responsibilities, support your fellow employees, and provide professional and respectful service to the community exemplify the qualities of an outstanding City employee. The City of Exeter proudly recognizes and congratulates you on being named Employee of the Quarter. Presented this 22 day of September, 2026 nd COUNCIL MEMBER LENTZ Skilled Maintenance Worker COUNCIL MEMBER RIDDLE MAYOR JOHNSON COUNCIL MEMBER ALVES September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
EXETER CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
ACTION MINUTES
September 08, 2026, 6:30 PM
City Hall, 137 North F Street
Exeter, California 93221
Mayor
Jacob Johnson
Mayor Pro Tem
Jeff Wilson
Council Members
Vicki Riddle
Frankie Alves
Bobby Lentz
Notice is hereby given that the Exeter City Council will hold a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 08, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in person at Exeter City Hall located at 137 N. F St. in Exeter California, 93221.
Staff Reports related to items on the agenda are available on the City’s website at https://cityofexeter.ca.gov/ and available for viewing at City Hall. 6:30 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER CLOSED SESSION
Mayor called the closed session to order at 6:30 PM.
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING CLOSED SESSION MATTERS
No public comments were presented.
C. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION(S)
1. GC 54956.9 – Consideration of Liability Claims
Claimant: Morri Lee Burris Mendez
Claimed Against: City of Exeter
2. GC 54956.9(d)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel
Re Existing Litigation
City of Exeter v. Bumgarner, Tulare County Superior Court No. VCU323368 Martinez v. Lujan et al., U.S. District Court No. 1:25-cv-01494-SAB
3. GC 54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiations
Agency Negotiator: Jason Ridenour and Julia Lew
Employee Groups: CLOCEA
7:00 p.m.
D. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Mayor Johnson called the regular session to order at 07:00 p.m. City Attorney Lew noted for the record that there was no reportable action taken out of closed session.
E. INVOCATION
Led by Mayor Johnson.
F. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Mayor Pro Tem Wilson.
G. PUBLIC COMMENT
None presented.
H. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation Honoring the Life, Service, and Homecoming of Sergeant Adolph P.
Aguirre, United States Air Force (p. 5)
Presented by Mayor Johnson
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.
1. Approval of August 25, 2026, Regular Meeting Minutes (pp. 6 – 10)
2. Approval of the Payment of Bills for August 21, 2026 (pp. 11 – 21)
3. Approval of Payroll for the Period August 10, 2026, through August 23, 2026 (pp. 22 – 29)
4. Approval of a Revised Street Closure Request from Exeter Unified School District for the 2026 Exeter High School Homecoming Parade Rescheduled to October 9, 2026, Subject to the Previously Approved Conditions of Approval (pp. 30 – 36)
5. Approval of a Street Closure and Traffic Control Request from FYE Events for the 2026 Scarecrow Run on October 10, 2026, Subject to the Conditions of Approval (pp. 38 – 46)
6. Authorization of Street Closures for the City of Exeter’s Annual Christmas Parade and Related Activities on December 4, 2026 (pp. 47 – 51)
7. Approval of a Temporary Street Closure and Temporary No-Parking Restrictions for the 2027 Rocky Hill Triathlon on March 13, 2027 (pp. 52 – 59)
8. Approval of a Facility Use Request from Painted Sweet LLC for the Craftober Kids Craft Fair at City Park on October 24, 2026, Subject to the Conditions of Approval (pp. 60 – 70)
9. Award and Approve the Selection of Provost & Pritchard Consulting (P&P) Professional Engineering Services for the City of Exeter Drinking Water System Improvement Project, Drinking Water Planning Grant (California Water Boards Project No. 5410003-001P), and Authorize the City Administrator (or Designee) to Negotiate and Execute a Project September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Specific Contract Consistent with the City's On-Call Professional Engineering Services Agreement (RFQ 26-01), in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,560,000.00 (pp. 71 – 129)
10. Approval of a Request for the Exeter Memorial District to Display a Banner Honoring Sergeant Adolph P. Aguirre to be Across Pine Street (pp. 130 – 133) Approval of Consent Calendar
1st 2nd Result JONHSON WILSON ALVES RIDDLE LENTZ
ALVES WILSON (5-0) AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE
J. INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS ITEMS
Comments related to Individual Business and Public Hearing Items are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, for a maximum of 30 minutes per item. The Mayor may reasonably limit or extend the public comment period to preserve the Council's interest in conducting efficient, orderly meetings.
1. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-39, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Exeter, Approving Amendments to the City of Exeter Master Rate and Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (pp. 134 – 139) Presented by Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Finance Director provided a report for the Council and members of the public.
Mayor opened the item up for public hearing at 7:07 p.m. No public comments were presented. Mayor closed the public hearing at 7:07 p.m.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-39, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Exeter, Approving Amendments to the City of Exeter Master Rate and Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
1st 2nd Result JONHSON WILSON ALVES RIDDLE LENTZ
JOHNSON ALVES (5-0) AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE
2. Consideration of Geographic Residency Requirements for Planning Commission Membership and Direction Regarding Amendment of Chapter 2.16 of the Exeter Municipal Code (pp. 140 – 146)
Presented by Jason Ridenour, City Administrator
City Administrator provided a report for the Council and members of the public.
Mayor opened the item up for public comment. No public comments were presented.
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Following discussion, the City Council directed staff to amend Chapter 2.16 of the Exeter Municipal Code to establish the Urban Development Boundary as the geographic residency requirement for Planning Commission membership. The Council further directed that the current Planning Commissioner residing outside the Urban Development Boundary be permitted to complete their existing term, which expires in January 2029, and that the proposed ordinance amendment be brought back to the City Council for first reading.
Adoption of the Urban Development Boundary as the geographic residency requirement for Planning Commission membership; allow the current Planning Commissioner residing outside the Urban Development Boundary to complete their existing term ending in January 2029; and direct staff to bring back an ordinance amending Chapter 2.16 of the Exeter Municipal Code for first reading. 1st 2nd Result JONHSON WILSON ALVES RIDDLE LENTZ
JOHNSON WILSON (5-0) AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE
3. Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-40, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Exeter, Approving the Updated City of Exeter Statement of Investment Policy and Resolution No. 2026-41, Delegating Investment Authority to the Treasurer (pp. 147 – 198)
Presented by Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Finance Director provided a report for the Council and members of the public.
Mayor opened the item up for public comment. No public comments were presented.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-40, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Exeter, Approving the Updated City of Exeter Statement of Investment Policy and Resolution No. 2026-41, Delegating Investment Authority to the Treasurer 1st 2nd Result JONHSON WILSON ALVES RIDDLE LENTZ
JOHNSON WILSON (5-0) AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE
4. Consideration of Options to Address the use of Golf Carts and Low Speed Vehicles on City Streets, Including the Enforcement of Current California Vehicle Codes, Development of a Targeted Golf Cart and Low Speed Vehicle Plan or Authorization of the Preparation and Submittal of an Application to the Caltrans Fiscal Year 2027-28 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program for a Citywide Exeter Mobility Plan, Inclusive of Golf Carts and other Low-speed Travel Modes, and Commit the Required Local Match (pp. 199 – 341)
Presented by Jason Ridenour, City Administrator
City Administrator provided a report for the Council and members of the public.
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Mayor opened the item up for public comment. No public comments were presented.
Authorize staff to proceed with the development of a Golf Cart and Low-Speed Vehicle Plan/Program; appropriate $25,000 from the General Fund for development of the Plan/Program; and authorize staff to apply for the Caltrans Fiscal Year 2027-28 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant.
1st 2nd Result JONHSON WILSON ALVES RIDDLE LENTZ
ALVES JOHNSON (4-1) AYE AYE AYE AYE NAY
K. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS OF INTEREST
Council Member Alves reported on impacts associated with walnut harvest season and noted the upcoming September 11 Memorial event and Sergeant Aguirre ceremony scheduled for September 18, 2026, at the Exeter Cemetery.
Mayor Pro Tem Wilson reported visiting the Firebaugh Avenue test well site and attending the Tooleville Water Board meeting and a community workday with Radiant Church.
Council Member Riddle thanked Radiant Church for their community work day and noted that she has been assisting with preparations for the September 11 Memorial event. She also provided an update regarding the arrival and procession for Sergeant Aguirre’s remains.
Council Member Lentz had no items to report.
Mayor Johnson noted the upcoming September 11 Memorial event and Fall Festival and commented on the number of upcoming community events and was glad there was so much going on in Exeter.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR/DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
City Administrator, Public Works Director, Chief of Police, Finance Director, City Attorney and City Clerk/Human Resources provided comments/reports.
L. REGULAR MEETING ADJOURNMENT
Mayor adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
____________________________
Francesca Nevarez, City Clerk
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Approval of the Payment of Bills for September 4, 2026, and September 8, 2026.
Submitting Department:
Finance
Contact Name:
Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the payment of bills in the following amounts. • $399,776.41 dated September 4, 2026, for expenditures charged to FY 2026-2027 • $4,995.43 dated September 8, 2026, for expenditures charged to FY 2026-2027 • $25,621.93 dated September 8, 2026, for accrued expenditures charged to FY 2025- 2026
The Finance Department has reviewed and compiled invoices and expenses for city operations for approval by the City Council, which are summarized and attached to this report.
The payment of bills is recurring action presented to the City Council to ensure transparency and fiscal oversight of city expenditures. The item reflects payments made for various city services, supplies, utilities, and obligations incurred in the normal course of business. All bills have been reviewed by the Finance Department and are within budgeted appropriations. • Total amount: $430,393.77 dated September 4, 2026, and September 8, 2026 • Funding source: Various city departmental budgets
For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
_J.R.___
Agenda Item Number: I.2
Department Recommendation:
Summary:
Background:
Fiscal Impact:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
• Budget implications: All payments are within the approved Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and Fiscal Year 2026-2027 budgets. No additional appropriations are necessary.
The City Council routinely approves payment of bills during regular meetings. This item is part of the standard financial reporting and authorization process. • Payments for Publication dated September 4, 2026
• Payments for Publication dated September 8, 2026
I move to approve the payment of bills in the amount of $430,393.77 dated September 4, 2026, and September 8, 2026.
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
AVENU FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF EXETER
09/04/2026 16:08:12 Payments for Publication GL050S-V08.23 COVERPAGE GL335R
Report Selection:
Run Group... 090426 Comment... CHECK RUN 09/04/2026
Approval Date for Report........... 09 04 2026
Payments Through Date.............. 09 04 2026
Cutoff Amount to be Used........... 0000000
RUN GROUP... 090426 COMMENT... CHECK RUN 09/04/2026
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
D-09042026-459 CHECK RUN 09/04/2026
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI CP SP RT L 01 LASERHP4 Y S 6 066 10
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
AVENU FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF EXETER
9/04/2026 16:08:12 Payments for Publication GL335R-V08.23 PAGE Approved on 9/04/2026 for Payments Through 9/04/2026
Vendor Name Description Amount
AAA QUALITY SERVICES 8/23/26-9/19/26-CITY PRK 1,071.57
BEATWEAR INC. DONLEY-CADET/PT UNIFORM 2,262.15
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 9/1/26-9/30/26 38,579.06
BUZZ KILL PEST CONTROL JUL 1907 W MEYER PEST CO 238.00
C.L.E.A. SEP 2026 LT DISABILITY 97.50
CALIFORNIA TURF EQUIPMENT 8 QTY BERMUDA SEED 50LB 6,477.50 CAPELLO/ ERIC UB DEPOSIT REFUND 19.28
CHAD CANERDAY E26-VW2568 PART REPAIR 548.37
CHERRY/ CORRINE AMANDA UB DEPOSIT REFUND 113.19
CITY OF EXETER 7/18-8/18/26 AWBREY 3,489.28
CITY OF VISALIA SEPT 2026 ANIMAL SERVICE 17,107.69
CIVICPLUS, LLC REC MGT ANNUAL FEE 6,479.68
COUNTY OF TULARE CORP YARD-HAZ MAT 1,320.00
CULLIGAN AUG FD WTR SERVICE 179.55
DATA TICKET, INC JULY CITATION PROCESSING 162.81
DIAZ/ SOCORRO UB DEPOSIT REFUND 57.71
DISTRIBUTOR OPERATIONS INC MTX-94R/H7 BATTERY 247.90
ELITE CORPORATE MEDICAL SERV JUL MEDICAL FEE-53 1,404.50 FIRST CHOICE AUTO BODY & PAINT E04-PAINT/BODY LABOR 3,167.08 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC. 5139-8/14/26-9/13/26 1,737.16
HPS WEST, INC 3/4" BLMJ METER LF BODY 8,226.19
LANDMARK IRRIGATION INC W12-PVC VAN STONE FLANGE 1,208.93 LARSON/ ROSALIND RINI UB DEPOSIT REFUND 60.25
LAWRENCE TRACTOR CO MOWER BLADE 207.78
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE JUN NEGOTIATIONS 2026 12,646.00 LIOTTA/ CALLI MICHELLE UB DEPOSIT REFUND 22.15
MID VALLEY DISPOSAL, LLC AUG 2026 MID VALLEY 125,371.05 MINERAL KING PUBLISHING INC 8/26 PN-ANIMAL CONT FEES 253.00 PFEIFFER/ JEFFREY AND JEANETTE SQUIRREL EXTRACT-DOBSON 1,500.00 PRESTIGE CHEMICALS PRODUCT LLC WASH AND WAX/VANDALL REM 843.98 PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. SEP PREMIUM-30 4,021.71
PROFORCE MARKETING INC A7 MALE PANL SET/CARRIER 1,093.91 RCX SPORTS LLC 2026 FLG FTBALL UNIFORMS 3,034.20
SCA OF CA, LLC AUG 2026 AIR ST SWEEPING 4,750.00
SELF-HELP ENTERPRISES JUL26 16004 ACT DELIVERY 9,890.39 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9143-7/13/26-8/10/26 59,654.26 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1600-7/28/26-8/28/26 695.47 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. SEP 2026 LIFE INSURANCE 2,935.36 STAPLES, INC. 6 CT PPR TOWEL ROLL 229.03
STEWART/ JAMES RAYMOND UB DEPOSIT REFUND 90.45
T-MOBILE PD 7/21/26-8/20/26 CELL 1,681.75
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS PUR/INST 2 FLOW METER 50,951.15
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 4/28/26-4/27/27 TRST FEE 1,375.00 TOLBERT/ GAVIN CV-TRIM 33 TREES 13,660.00
ULINE CHLORINE TEST PAPER/ICE 463.34
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 8/4/26 UNIFORM CLEANING 1,008.34
USA TODAY MEDIA CORP NOTICE ELECTION-VTD ADV 322.80
VALLEY EXPETEC SEPT MONTHLY BILLING 8,339.87
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
AVENU FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF EXETER
9/04/2026 16:08:12 Payments for Publication GL335R-V08.23 PAGE Approved on 9/04/2026 for Payments Through 9/04/2026
Vendor Name Description Amount
WIZIX TECHONOLOGY GROUP INC PD 6/9/26-7/8/26 BASE 480.07 ** Final Totals... 399,776.41
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
AVENU FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF EXETER
9/04/2026 16:08:12 Payments for Publication GL335R-V08.23 PAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF RECORDS PRINTED 260
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
AVENU FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF EXETER
09/04/2026 16:08:12 Payments for Publication GL060S-V08.23 RECAPPAGE GL335R
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS
---- ----------------------------
104 GENERAL FUND 44,940.65
105 WATER FUND 57,258.61
106 SANITATION FUND 125,752.01
107 SEWER FUND 62,050.75
109 GAS TAX FUND 9,187.23
111 CDBG REVOLVING FUND 662.20
116 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING FUND 366.60
117 FTHB PROGRAM INCOME FUND 2,030.94
118 HOME FUND 6,804.85
121 INSURANCE FUND 46,940.63
128 GRANTS 25.80
140 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTR 16,881.57
141 MEASURE P 26,874.57
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 399,776.41
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS
---- ----------------------------
BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA 399,776.41
TOTAL ALL BANKS 399,776.41
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Approval of Payroll for the Period August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026.
Submitting Department:
Finance
Contact Name:
Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Staff recommends that the City Council approve payroll for the period August 24, 2026, to September 6, 2026, in the following amounts.
• $89,798.75 for August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026, period with a check date of September 11, 2026.
This item requests City Council approval of payroll expenditures incurred during the pay period of August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026, timely approval ensures the city remains compliant with labor obligations and continues uninterrupted compensation to employees.
The City of Exeter processes payroll on a biweekly basis. City Council approval is required for each payroll cycle as part of the City’s fiscal oversight procedures. The current payroll covers all regular full-time, part-time, and temporary employees for the specified pay period. • Total payroll amount: $89,798.75 (for August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026, payroll periods)
• Funding source: Approved departmental salary budgets
For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
_J.R.___
Agenda Item Number: I.3
Department Recommendation:
Summary:
Background:
Fiscal Impact:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
• Budget implications: Payroll is within the adopted Fiscal Year 2026-2027 budget; no additional funds are required.
Payroll approval is a standing item brought to the City Council regularly to ensure accountability and continuity of operations.
• Payroll Register for the period of August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026.
I move to approve payroll for the period August 24, 2026, through September 6, 2026, in the amount of $89,798.75.
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 1 CHECK FORM..CHEK CHECK REGISTER PR311R-V14.25 Paymate
PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
DIRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE/BANK/VENDOR CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT NAME CODE SEQ
2 0.00 LANDEROS/SAVANNAH KAYLE 782 2 MANUAL
6 0.00 RICH/RYLAN TATE 769 2 MANUAL
1918 63.69 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN 2 1 VENDOR CHECK
1919 1,617.61 MELLINGER/GRANT EDWARD 790 1
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM: CHEK
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS COUNTS
1,617.61 *EMPLOYEE CHECKS 1
63.69 *VENDOR CHECKS 1
0.00 *BANK CHECKS 0
1,681.30 **TOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS 2
OTHER CHECKS
0.00 *MANUAL CHECKS 2
0.00 *CANCELLED CHECKS 0
1,681.30 **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
0.00 *DIRECT DEPOSIT STUBS 0
0.00 *VENDOR DIR DEP STUBS 0
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 2 CHECK FORM..STUB CHECK REGISTER PR311R-V14.25 Paymate
PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
DIRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE/BANK/VENDOR CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT NAME CODE SEQ
1 0.00 ALANIZ/WYATT BLAIN 757 2 MANUAL
3 0.00 DOBBS/JACOB ALLEN 771 2 MANUAL
4 0.00 BUCKLES/HUNTER DAVIN 770 2 MANUAL
5 0.00 BARSS/TYLER ANN 758 2 MANUAL
55241 175.50 CLOCEA 4 1 VENDOR STUB ONLY
55242 308.00 EXETER POLICE OFFICER AS 3 1 VENDOR STUB ONLY 55243 192.94 EXETER POLICE OFFICER AS 3A 1 VENDOR STUB ONLY 55244 2,249.36 ARIAS/CHRISTINA 730 1 STUB ONLY
55245 2,884.59 QUINTANA FRANCESCA N 742 1 STUB ONLY
55246 4,917.74 RIDENOUR/JASON CHARLES 763 1 STUB ONLY
55247 1,481.67 CARTER/AMY JO 502 1 STUB ONLY
55248 3,090.07 HERNANDEZ/XOCHITL 306 1 STUB ONLY
55249 1,508.54 RAMOS LEON/YOSENIA 776 1 STUB ONLY
55250 3,983.24 RODRIGUEZ/JANIE 786 1 STUB ONLY
55251 1,709.40 TOBIAS/ANTHONY JORDAN 746 1 STUB ONLY
55252 1,880.82 BROWN/ANDREW EUGENE 762 1 STUB ONLY
55253 2,050.40 BRYANT/EZRA JOSEPH 752 1 STUB ONLY
55254 1,713.29 CARRETERO/VANESSA 402 1 STUB ONLY
55255 2,297.84 DONLEY/COLLIN BRENT 788 1 STUB ONLY
55256 1,898.64 DUNAGAN/MATTHEW THOMAS 787 1 STUB ONLY
55257 3,335.24 GREEN GROVE/BRAYDEN TAY 767 1 STUB ONLY
55258 635.55 GRIMSLEY/RICK WAYNE 791 1 STUB ONLY
55259 3,263.07 HEINKS/RYAN DAVID 765 1 STUB ONLY
55260 1,702.93 HERNANDEZ/ANDY 780 1 STUB ONLY
55261 1,319.16 HILL/HANNAH GRACE 747 1 STUB ONLY
55262 1,955.10 LINARES/FRANCISCO JR 772 1 STUB ONLY
55263 1,702.96 MAGANA MARTINEZ JOEL 773 1 STUB ONLY
55264 3,695.78 MOORE/ROBERT HARRY 764 1 STUB ONLY
55265 1,912.37 MORALES/SKYLEENA ROSE 779 1 STUB ONLY
55266 4,141.14 SCHIMPF/ROBERT BRIAN 766 1 STUB ONLY
55267 2,220.85 SHIELDS/ZION 708 1 STUB ONLY
55268 2,351.87 VILLARREAL/ISIDRO 707 1 STUB ONLY
55269 1,973.19 ALDRIDGE/GARY 618 1 STUB ONLY
55270 3,886.45 BOUDREAUX/ZACHARY MICHA 756 1 STUB ONLY
55271 1,847.91 HUGGINS/KYLE AARON 621 1 STUB ONLY
55272 2,648.24 MILLAN/MARCUS 622 1 STUB ONLY
55273 519.28 WENDT/EDDIE 626 1 STUB ONLY
55274 1,657.56 GARVER/ELIJAH 712 1 STUB ONLY
55275 1,632.55 MCCOOL/JASPER JAX 785 1 STUB ONLY
55276 1,547.01 QUIROZ/PATRICK P 512 1 STUB ONLY
55277 2,164.51 RAMIREZ/GABRIEL GRACILI 761 1 STUB ONLY
55278 1,999.15 RAMIREZ/JUAN 608 1 STUB ONLY
55279 1,691.90 RIVERA/RYAN 733 1 STUB ONLY
55280 2,436.72 HIFNER/CHRISTOPHER 736 1 STUB ONLY
55281 794.21 RUBIO/IVAN 750 1 STUB ONLY
55282 1,263.69 CREECH/JACE W 777 1 STUB ONLY
55283 1,477.02 OROZCO MAQUEDA/RAFAEL 792 1 STUB ONLY
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 3 CHECK FORM..STUB CHECK REGISTER PR311R-V14.25 Paymate
PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
DIRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE/BANK/VENDOR CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT NAME CODE SEQ
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM: STUB
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS COUNTS
0.00 *EMPLOYEE CHECKS 0
0.00 *VENDOR CHECKS 0
0.00 *BANK CHECKS 0
0.00 **TOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS 0
OTHER CHECKS
0.00 *MANUAL CHECKS 4
0.00 *CANCELLED CHECKS 0
0.00 **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
87,441.01 *DIRECT DEPOSIT STUBS 40
676.44 *VENDOR DIR DEP STUBS 3
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 4 RECAP BY FUND CHECKS/STUBS/MANUAL/CANC'D PR311R-V14.25 Paymate PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
EMPLOYER FUND HOME WORKED WORKED
CODE CODE TOTALS TOTALS DIR DEP
1 104 72,434.25 52,442.13 52,184.92
1 105 8,960.83 14,845.75 14,157.54
1 106 .00 1,167.63 1,167.63
1 107 .00 10,594.51 9,922.32
1 121 .00 2,279.58 2,279.58
1 141 7,663.54 7,729.02 7,729.02
NOTE--"HOME TOTALS" CHECK AMOUNT CAN BE RECONCILED TO THE FIGURES OF THE FOLLOWING REPORTS:
#1 CALCULATION TOTALS BY HOME FUND (NET PAY + REIMB. EXP.) #2 PAYROLL REGISTER (CHECK AMOUNT)
NOTE--"WORKED TOTALS" CHECK AMOUNT CAN BE RECONCILED TO THE FIGURES OF THE FOLLOWING REPORTS:
#1 CALCULATION TOTALS BY FUND WORKED (NET PAY + REIMB. EXP.) #2 LABOR DISTRIBUTION (NET PAY + REIMB. EXP.)
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 5 RECAP BY DEPT CHECKS/STUBS/MANUAL/CANC'D PR311R-V14.25 Paymate PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
EMR FUND DEPT HOME FULL PART TEMP FEMALE
CODE CODE CODE TOTALS EMPLOYEE COUNTS
1 104 402 ADMINISTRATION 10,051.69 3 2
1 104 403 FINANCE 11,772.92 5 4
1 104 421 POLICE 38,077.01 16 1 3
1 104 431 STREET 10,875.07 4 1
1 104 471 RECREATION 1,657.56 1 6
1 105 461 WATER 8,960.83 5
1 141 405 CODE ENFORCEMENT 1,691.90 1
1 141 421 POLICE 2,436.72 1
1 141 471 RECREATION LEADER 794.21 1
1 141 472 PARKS 2,740.71 2
TOTAL 89,058.62 39 7 1 9
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
PAYROLL........S BI-WEEKLY RUN-09/09/2026 15.16.27 PAGE 6 RECAP BY DEPT CHECKS/STUBS/MANUAL/CANC'D PR311R-V14.25 Paymate PERIOD 1 DATING 8/24/2026- 9/06/2026 CHECK DATE 9/11/2026
EMPLOYER FUND HOME WORKED WORKED
CODE CODE TOTALS TOTALS DIR DEP
GRAND TOTALS
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS COUNTS
1,617.61 *EMPLOYEE CHECKS 1
63.69 *VENDOR CHECKS 1
0.00 *BANK CHECKS 0
1,681.30 **TOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS 2
OTHER CHECKS
0.00 *MANUAL CHECKS 6
0.00 *CANCELLED CHECKS 0
1,681.30 ***GRAND TOTAL
NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
87,441.01 *DIRECT DEPOSIT STUBS 40
676.44 *VENDOR DIR DEP STUBS 3
88,117.45 **TOTAL NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS 43
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS/NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
1,617.61 *EMPLOYEE CHECKS 1
63.69 *VENDOR CHECKS 1
0.00 *BANK CHECKS 0
87,441.01 *DIRECT DEPOSIT STUBS 40
676.44 *VENDOR DIR DEP STUBS 3
89,798.75 ***TOTAL NEGOTIABLE & NON-NEGOT 45
0.00 *OTHER CHECKS 6
89,798.75 ***TOTAL NEG, NON-NEG, OTHER CHECKS
TOTAL SEQ 1 FEMALES 9
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Approval of a Request from the Fall Festival Committee to Display a Banner Across Pine Street for the 2026 Exeter Fall Festival.
Submitting Department:
Administration
Contact Name:
Jason Ridenour, City Administrator
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request from the Fall Festival Committee to display a banner across Pine Street and signs promoting the 2026 Exeter Fall Festival, subject to compliance with the City’s Banner Policy.
On December 9, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-44 approving a policy governing the exhibition of federal, state, and City flags and banners from City buildings and facilities. Chapter 17.69.07 of the Zoning Ordinance also requires that any sign located or displayed on or over public property receive City Council approval.
The Fall Festival Committee has submitted an application requesting authorization to display a banner across Pine Street promoting the 2026 Exeter Fall Festival. The applicant has requested that the banner be installed prior to the event and removed following the Fall Festival. Pursuant to the City’s Banner Policy, banners may not be displayed more than 14 days prior to the associated event and must be removed within five days following the event. Accordingly, installation and removal will be coordinated to comply with the applicable display period and all other requirements of the City’s Banner Policy.
The Fall Festival Committee has also requested to place temporary signs proposed to be placed in the grass area east of CACHE and at Brickhouse Park. In accordance with 17.69.07(K), any sign For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
_J.R.___
Agenda Item Number: I.4.
Department Recommendation:
Summary & Background:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
located or displayed on, or over public property is prohibited, unless approved by the City Council.
There is minimal staff time associated with hanging the banner across Pine Street. No other significant fiscal impact is anticipated. Pursuant to the City’s Banner Policy, the applicant is responsible for applicable production, installation, and removal costs.
On December 9, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-44 approving a policy on the exhibition of federal, state, and City flags, and banners from City buildings and facilities. • Submitted Banner Application
I move to approve the request from the Fall Festival Committee to display a banner across Pine Street, temporary sign on the park area east of Cache, and at Brick House Park promoting the 2026 Exeter Fall Festival in accordance with the Banner Policy and Sign Ordinance.
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Review and Acceptance of the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for August 2026.
Submitting Department:
Finance
Contact Name:
Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Staff recommends that the City Council review and accept the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for August 2026.
As required by California Government Code Section 53607 and the City’s Statement of Investment Policy, the Finance Director/Treasurer will provide the City Council with a monthly report listing investment transactions, including investments purchased, sold, or that have reached maturity, along with any Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) transfers during the preceding month.
For the period of August 1 through August 31, 2026, there were no reportable investment transactions. Accordingly, the August 2026 Monthly Investment Transactions Report reflects no investment purchases, sales, maturities, or LAIF transfers during the reporting period.
This monthly report is in addition to the quarterly Treasurer’s Report, which includes additional information required under Section XII.A, Periodic Reporting, of the City’s Statement of Investment Policy and submitted to the City Council within 45 days following the end of the quarter.
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
J.R.__
Agenda Item Number: I.5.
Department Recommendation:
Summary/Background:
Fiscal Impact:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
None associated with this action. This is the first Monthly Investment Transactions Report being submitted pursuant to Section XII.A of the City’s Statement of Investment Policy and consistent with California Government Code Section 53607.
• August 2026 Monthly Investment Transactions Report
I move to accept the Monthly Investment Transaction Report for August 2026.
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
CITY OF EXETER
Monthly Investment Transactions Report
August 1 through August 31, 2026
Account Trans. Date August 2026
Local Agency Investment Fund
Beginning Balance $ 23,924,991.97
Transactions
None
Ending Balance $ 23,924,991.97
Account Trans. Date August 2026
U.S. Government and Government-Sponsored Securities
Beginning Balance $ 1,161,292.53
Transactions
None
Ending Balance $ 1,161,292.53
Account Trans. Date August 2026
Certificates of Deposit
Beginning Balance $ 2,947,000.00
Transactions
None
Ending Balance $ 2,947,000.00
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Authorize Payment to Mid Valley Disposal (MVD) in the Amount of $13,808.25 for the City's 2026 Compost Procurement in Satisfaction of the Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) Organic Waste Procurement Target.
Submitting Department:
Public Works
Contact Name:
Zachary Boudreaux, Director of Public Works
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize payment to Mid Valley Disposal (MVD) in the amount of $13,808.25 for the City's 2026 compost procurement, satisfying the City's 2026 SB 1383 organic waste procurement target.
SB 1383 requires the City to annually procure a minimum quantity of recovered organic waste products, such as compost, mulch, or renewable gas, based on a per capita procurement target set by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle).
Using the City's Department of Finance population estimate of 10,287 residents and the 0.08 ton-per-resident procurement target, the City's 2026 procurement target is 822.96 tons of organic waste, equivalent to a minimum of 477.31 tons of compost if met through compost alone.
In July 2026, the Public Works Department received a quote for 478 tons of 3/8-inch screened compost from MVD for a total cost of $15,956.85 (net amount due of $13,808.25 after an existing account credit of $2,148.60), satisfying approximately 100.1 percent of the City's 2026 SB 1383 procurement target through this single purchase.
For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
_J.R.____
Agenda Item Number: I.6.
Department Recommendation:
Summary:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
SB 1383 (Lara, Statutes of 2016) established statewide targets to reduce organic waste disposal by 75 percent from 2014 levels by 2025, and requires jurisdictions to procure a minimum quantity of recovered organic waste products annually to help build markets for organic waste diverted from California landfills. CalRecycle notifies each jurisdiction of its procurement target, which may also be calculated using the jurisdiction's population multiplied by the 0.08 ton per capita procurement target established in 14 CCR Section 18993.1. Under the regulations, the City's procurement target is recalculated every five years.
The City tracks its compliance using CalRecycle's SB 1383 Procurement Calculator Tool. Under the regulatory conversion factor, 1 ton of organic waste in the procurement target is satisfied by 0.58 tons of compost (or 1.45 cubic yards). Compost procured by the Public Works Department is applied to City-maintained parks, medians, and Lighting and Landscape District (LLMD) planting areas as part of routine landscape maintenance operations, supporting soil health and water retention while meeting the City's SB 1383 obligation.
The $15,956.85 quote associated with this action includes procurement of 478 tons of compost, hauler delivery fees and applicable sales tax. An existing account credit of $2,148.60 will be applied, resulting in a net amount due of $13,808.25. Funds for this purchase are available in the Sanitation Fund, Account No. 106.451.022.000.
On October 14, 2025, the City Council approved the purchase of 510 tons of compost from Mid Valley Disposal in the amount of $16,563.18 to meet the City's 2025 SB 1383 organic waste procurement target. This item follows the same approach for the City's 2026 procurement target.
• Mid-Valley Disposal Quote
• Mid-Valley Credit on Account
• California Department of Finance Press Release Regarding Population • City of Exeter 2026 SB 1383 Procurement Target & Planning Calculator (CalRecycle Procurement Calculator Tool)
• October 14, 2025 City Council Agenda Item
I move to authorize payment to MVD in the amount of $13,808.25 for the City's 2026 compost procurement, in satisfaction of the City of Exeter's 2026 SB 1383 organic waste procurement target.
Background:
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Transaction Entry Detail
Detail Value
Transaction Entry ID 29358136
Transaction Type UNAPPLIED PAYMENT
Transaction Description PAYMENT
Transaction Date Dec 30 2025 3:22PM
Effective Date Dec 22 2025
Source Account # 73185700
Billing Account # 73185700
Service Name EXETER CITY COMPOST
Billing Name EXETER CITY
Units 1
Unit Amount $-2148.60
Total $-2148.60
Reference 89989
BatchGroupID 1119129
BatchItemID 195
Report Generated on Sep 17 2026 11:12AM by COREASP\MVDGHeer Transaction Detail Page 1 of 1
about:blank 9/17/2026
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
FEDERAL POLICY CHANGES CONSTRICTING LEGAL INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION CAUSE SLIGHT STATE POPULATION DIP IN 2025
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: H.D. Palmer (916) 323-0648 May 1, 2026 Walter Schwarm (916) 323-4086
SACRAMENTO--- A full year of restrictive federal policy changes cut legal international migration to California by more than half in 2025 and drove a slight decline (less than 1/7th of 1%) in California’s overall population, according to new data released today by the California Department of Finance.
Absent these changes, California’s population as of January 1st would have seen a slight increase of 66,000 over the same period. Because of these federal changes, the state experienced a small decline of 54,000.
The 0.14-percent decline to 39,593,000 marks the first year of population loss after three consecutive years of population increases following the COVID-19 pandemic.
From 2021 to 2024, California’s growth in net international migration was driven by both legal immigrants and the expansion of international humanitarian migration programs. 2025’s ending of nearly all humanitarian migration programs, combined with a significant slowing legal immigration processing resulted in net legal international immigration declining in 2025 by more than fifty percent from 248,400 persons during 2024—the highest level since 2018—to 126,400 during 2025.
Net legal international migration has been a significant driver of California’s overall population, offsetting declines in natural increase—the net number of births and deaths—and net domestic migration from California. While natural increase added in 2025, by 108,200 persons, it is down by 4,500 from 2024. Net domestic out-migration from California increased to 288,600 in 2025.
This report contains preliminary year-over-year January 2026 and revised January 2021 through January 2025 population data for California cities, counties, and the state. These estimates are based on information as of January 1, 2026.
Other highlights of the January 1, 2026 city and county population report include:
• California’s 58 counties range in size from Alpine County, with just over 1,180 residents, to Los Angeles County with 9.8 million residents. The population increased in 17 counties, with most growth in the Central Valley and the Inland Empire. Population gains generally reflect natural increase exceeding losses in net migration.
• The state’s ten largest counties remain Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Clara, Alameda, Sacramento, Contra Costa, and Fresno, with each having more than one million residents. These ten counties represent 72 percent of California’s population. Half of the ten counties with one million or more people have positive population growth, with Sacramento, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Clara, and San Bernardino among the gainers. Sacramento led with an increase of 9,000 persons. Los Angeles lost 64,000 persons, a combined effect of the Eaton and Palisades wildfires, normal September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
flow to the Inland Empire, and deportations. Collectively, the ten largest counties lost a net of over 52,000 persons.
• Population growth rates ranged from a high of 1.39 percent in Placer County to a low of -1.9 percent in Lassen County. The next five fastest growing counties based on percentage growth were Yuba (1.24 percent), San Benito (0.69 percent), Madera (0.68 percent), San Joaquin (0.63 percent), and Sacramento (0.58 percent).
• Statewide housing growth declined slightly from 0.84 percent in 2024 to 0.77 percent in 2025.
California added 115,165 housing units on net, bringing total housing in the state to 15,064,131 units. This marks the first time California has recorded over 15 million housing units.
This number includes the addition of 29,710 accessory dwelling units (ADUs), an 11.42 percent increase over the previous year, and the loss of 11,406 housing units due to fires, including 11,160 housing units lost to the Eaton and Palisades fires. • New construction added 116,471 housing units with 58,529 single family housing units, 56,855 multi-family housing units, and 1,087 mobile homes. ADUs accounted for 27.9 percent of the state’s new single-family housing (16,366 ADUs), 2.3 percent of the new multi-family housing (1,328 ADUs), and 15.2 percent of total new housing (17,694 units).
County and city housing highlights include:
• Yuba had the highest housing growth (2.32 percent) of all counties, followed by: Madera, Del Norte, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Colusa, Santa Clara, Riverside, and Yolo. • Thirteen counties gained housing at or above 1.0 percent. • Within counties ranked by net housing gains, Los Angeles (11,260), San Diego (8,635), Sacramento (5,048), Santa Clara (2,772), and San Jose (2,262) added the most housing units in 2025.
• Larger, densely populated urban areas built most of the multi-family housing throughout the state. Los Angeles led the state, gaining 7,061 multi-family units, comprising 62.7 percent of their net housing growth, followed by San Diego (6,179 for 71.6 percent), Sacramento (3,282 for 65 percent), and Santa Clara (2,700 for 97.4 percent). • Conversely, single-family housing is more likely to be built further inland in typically more suburban cities. Cities with a high proportion of single-family growth include Bakersfield (1,432 for 86.1 percent), Roseville (1,151 for 54.7 percent), Elk Grove (1,138 for 60.3 percent), Irvine (814 for 63.8 percent), Fontana (806 for 83 percent), Manteca (809 for 100 percent), and Lathrop (765 for 94.8 percent).
• The top five cities where housing production drove population growth include: Paradise (9.2 percent) in Butte County, Crescent City (6.2 percent) in Del Norte County, Mountain House (5.6 percent) in San Joaquin County, Lathrop (5.5 percent) in San Joaquin County, and Buellton (5.4 percent) in Santa Barbara County.
Also of note in the report:
• 148 cities gained population, while 333 lost population, and two (Monte Sereno in Santa Clara County and Industry in Los Angeles County) had no change. • Mountain House, in San Joaquin County, in its first full year after incorporating in July 2024, added over 1,600 persons (5.6 percent) in 2025.
• Of the ten largest cities in California, six gained population: led by Sacramento (1.3 percent, or 6,809) and San Diego (0.7 percent, or 10,102). • Group quarters represent 2.4 percent (940,383) of the statewide population. This population includes individuals living in college dormitories (284,000) and those in September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
correctional facilities (166,000). In 2025, California’s group quarter population increased by nearly 11,000 people (1.2 percent). The college dormitory population grew by 4,500 students over the past year (1.6 percent), with several jurisdictions experiencing notable increases. For example, the City of San Diego’s University of California campus grew by
10.4 percent, accounting for 22.5 percent of the city’s annual population change (0.7 percent). Additionally, the University of California Riverside City campus grew by 19.1 percent over the past year, accounting for the city’s overall growth (0.2 percent). • Correctional facilities declined in population by 1,500 people (-0.9 percent) across federal, state, and local facilities. Since state prisons are generally located in remote areas, changes in these population can have noticeable impact on local estimates. For example, prison declines contributed to population decreases in Norco (-7.1 percent) in Riverside County, Ione (-3.8 percent) in Amador County, and Adelanto (-1.7 percent) in San Bernardino County. Other cities saw increases in their populations due to changes in group quarter facilities. For example, Twentynine Palms (7.7 percent) in San Bernardino County, Crescent City (6.2 percent) in Del Norte County, and Coronado (4.9 percent) in San Diego County.
Background Information
These population estimates are produced annually by Finance for use by local areas to calculate their annual appropriations limit. The State Controller’s Office uses Finance's estimates to update its population figures for distribution of state subventions to cities and counties, and to comply with various state codes. Additionally, estimates are used for research and planning purposes by federal, state, and local agencies, the academic community, and the private sector.
Changes to the housing stock are used in the preparation of the annual city population estimates. Estimated occupancy of housing units and the number of persons per household further determine population levels. Changes in city housing stock result from new construction, demolitions, housing unit conversions, and annexations. The sub-county population estimates are then adjusted to be consistent with independently produced county estimates.
Comparing Census Bureau’s recently released July 1, 2025 estimates with Finance’s January 1, 2026 estimates should generally be avoided since they refer to different points in time. In addition, there are numerous differences between the two series, including the effects of natural disasters, changes in migration patterns, and accelerating slowdown in births.
All Finance population and housing estimates are benchmarked to a decennial census.
The estimates in this report are benchmarked to the 2020 decennial census.
Related population reports are available on the Department’s website:
http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/
# # #
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Department of Finance
Demographic Research Unit
Population Estimates for California Cities
10 Largest Cities
Population Percent Change
City January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Los Angeles 3,806,201 -0.9
2. San Diego 1,419,531 0.7
3. San Jose 980,434 -0.3
4. San Francisco 845,658 0.1
5. Fresno 560,948 0.1
6. Sacramento 539,765 1.3
7. Long Beach 462,193 -0.2
8. Oakland 429,591 0.0
9. Bakersfield 422,853 0.4
10. Anaheim 340,433 -0.1
10 Fastest Growing Cities with Populations Over 30,000
Population Percent Change
City January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Mountain House 30,687 5.6
2. Lathrop 40,942 5.6
3. Wildomar 38,841 3.9
4. Santa Clara 138,011 2.9
5. Burlingame 32,438 2.8
6. Roseville 165,455 2.7
7. Banning 32,323 2.5
8. Montclair 38,378 2.2
9. Folsom 95,680 2.1
10. Elk Grove 188,319 2.1
10 Cities Under 300,000 with the Largest Numeric Change Population Numeric Change
City January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Roseville 165,455 4,293
2. Santa Clara 138,011 3,923
3. Elk Grove 188,319 3,824
4. Ontario 187,863 2,517
5. Lathrop 40,942 2,151
6. Menifee 117,847 2,034
7. Folsom 95,680 2,001
8. Twentynine Palms 27,166 1,951
9. Sunnyvale 161,884 1,929
10. Norco 23,276 -1,774
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Department of Finance
Demographic Research Unit
Population Estimates for California Counites
10 Largest Counties
Population Percent Change
County January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Los Angeles 9,837,286 -0.6
2. San Diego 3,344,322 0.1
3. Orange 3,163,696 -0.4
4. Riverside 2,506,824 0.4
5. San Bernardino 2,216,685 0.1
6. Santa Clora 1,932,468 0.2
7. Alameda 1,666,136 -0.1
8. Sacramento 1,628,349 0.6
9. Contra Costa 1,163,891 -0.3
10. Fresno 1,041,676 0.0
10 Fastest Growing Counties by Population
Population Percent Change
County January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Placer 434,823 1.4
2. Yuba 87,692 1.2
3. Madera 166,407 0.7
4. San Benito 68,111 0.7
5. Sacramento 1,628,349 0.6
6. San Joaquin 820,125 0.6
7. Riverside 2,506,824 0.4
8. Sutter 101,679 0.4
9. Santa Clara 1,932,468 0.2
10. Tulare 489,610 0.2
10 Fastest Growing Counties by Housing Unit Growth
Housing Percent Change
County January 1, 2026 2025- 2026
1. Yuba 32,770 2.3
2. Madera 54,618 2.1
3. Del Norte 11,603 2.0
4. Placer 191,225 1.9
5. Sacramento 622,665 1.6
6. San Joaquin 273,498 1.4
7. Colusa 8,387 1.3
8. Riverside 904,277 1.2
9. Santa Clara 718,680 1.2
10. Yolo 86,085 1.2
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change CALIFORNIA 39,646,907 39,592,978 -0.1
Alameda 1,667,901 1,666,136 -0.1
Alameda 80,085 80,023 -0.1
Albany 20,614 20,564 -0.2
Berkeley 127,123 127,654 0.4
Dublin 75,014 74,769 -0.3
Emeryville 13,555 13,612 0.4
Fremont 233,428 233,974 0.2
Hayward 162,383 161,557 -0.5
Livermore 86,447 86,118 -0.4
Newark 49,156 48,962 -0.4
Oakland 429,732 429,591 0.0
Piedmont 10,841 10,802 -0.4
Pleasanton 76,659 76,149 -0.7
San Leandro 87,387 87,431 0.1
Union City 67,036 66,665 -0.6
Unincorporated 148,441 148,265 -0.1
Alpine 1,182 1,183 0.1
Amador 40,041 39,618 -1.1
Amador 184 183 -0.5
Ione 8,975 8,632 -3.8
Jackson 4,942 4,933 -0.2
Plymouth 1,135 1,129 -0.5
Sutter Creek 2,588 2,575 -0.5
Unincorporated 22,217 22,166 -0.2
Butte 208,597 208,941 0.2
Biggs 1,983 1,970 -0.7
Chico 108,026 108,113 0.1
Gridley 7,433 7,384 -0.7
Oroville 20,744 20,664 -0.4
Paradise 9,686 10,581 9.2
Unincorporated 60,725 60,229 -0.8
Calaveras 44,733 44,678 -0.1
Angels City 3,524 3,513 -0.3
Unincorporated 41,209 41,165 -0.1
Colusa 22,067 22,003 -0.3
Colusa 6,545 6,597 0.8
Williams 5,595 5,621 0.5
Unincorporated 9,927 9,785 -1.4
Contra Costa 1,167,506 1,163,891 -0.3
Antioch 118,756 118,440 -0.3
Brentwood 66,332 66,070 -0.4
Clayton 10,827 10,759 -0.6
Concord 123,075 122,494 -0.5
Danville 43,250 43,190 -0.1
El Cerrito 26,280 26,166 -0.4
Hercules 26,413 26,323 -0.3
Lafayette 25,380 25,321 -0.2
Martinez 36,774 36,521 -0.7
Moraga 16,760 16,662 -0.6
Oakley 47,100 47,039 -0.1
Orinda 19,494 19,412 -0.4
Pinole 18,468 18,891 2.3
Pittsburg 76,922 76,484 -0.6
Pleasant Hill 33,646 33,853 0.6
Richmond 114,415 113,695 -0.6
San Pablo 31,664 31,468 -0.6
San Ramon 84,173 84,220 0.1
Walnut Creek 70,736 70,288 -0.6
Unincorporated 177,041 176,595 -0.3
Del Norte 26,526 26,339 -0.7
Crescent City 6,035 6,407 6.2
Unincorporated 20,491 19,932 -2.7
El Dorado 190,397 189,852 -0.3
Placerville 10,490 10,428 -0.6
South Lake Tahoe 21,537 21,472 -0.3
Unincorporated 158,370 157,952 -0.3
Fresno 1,041,996 1,041,676 0.0
Clovis 129,570 129,889 0.2
Coalinga 17,622 17,692 0.4
Firebaugh 8,703 8,869 1.9
Fowler 7,705 7,945 3.1
Fresno 560,474 560,948 0.1
Huron 6,957 6,888 -1.0
Kerman 17,481 17,498 0.1
Kingsburg 13,358 13,347 -0.1
Mendota 12,829 12,805 -0.2
Orange Cove 9,752 9,678 -0.8
Parlier 14,726 14,658 -0.5
Reedley 26,690 26,845 0.6
Sanger 27,130 27,403 1.0
San Joaquin 3,672 3,636 -1.0
Selma 24,593 24,484 -0.4
Unincorporated 160,734 159,091 -1.0
Glenn 29,200 29,031 -0.6
Orland 8,658 8,632 -0.3
Willows 6,439 6,388 -0.8
Unincorporated 14,103 14,011 -0.7
Humboldt 133,362 133,026 -0.3
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Arcata 19,002 19,570 3.0
Blue Lake 1,158 1,149 -0.8
Eureka 26,287 26,163 -0.5
Ferndale 1,367 1,365 -0.1
Fortuna 12,289 12,185 -0.8
Rio Dell 3,257 3,224 -1.0
Trinidad 294 291 -1.0
Unincorporated 69,708 69,079 -0.9
Imperial 186,378 185,961 -0.2
Brawley 28,937 28,810 -0.4
Calexico 40,062 39,881 -0.5
Calipatria 5,916 6,002 1.5
El Centro 46,029 45,716 -0.7
Holtville 5,685 5,610 -1.3
Imperial 22,862 22,984 0.5
Westmorland 2,086 2,059 -1.3
Unincorporated 34,801 34,899 0.3
Inyo 18,797 18,780 -0.1
Bishop 3,849 3,852 0.1
Unincorporated 14,948 14,928 -0.1
Kern 926,369 927,328 0.1
Arvin 19,937 19,795 -0.7
Bakersfield 421,377 422,853 0.4
California City 13,243 13,141 -0.8
Delano 52,376 52,384 0.0
Maricopa 1,023 1,015 -0.8
McFarland 14,232 14,334 0.7
Ridgecrest 28,722 28,638 -0.3
Shafter 23,326 24,545 5.2
Taft 6,922 6,896 -0.4
Tehachapi 11,489 11,800 2.7
Wasco 25,993 25,806 -0.7
Unincorporated 307,729 306,121 -0.5
Kings 153,833 153,754 -0.1
Avenal 13,309 13,142 -1.3
Corcoran 21,585 21,504 -0.4
Hanford 61,113 60,837 -0.5
Lemoore 27,637 27,216 -1.5
Unincorporated 30,189 31,055 2.9
Lake 67,002 66,793 -0.3
Clearlake 16,701 16,642 -0.4
Lakeport 4,942 4,923 -0.4
Unincorporated 45,359 45,228 -0.3
Lassen 27,848 27,318 -1.9
Susanville 12,113 12,063 -0.4
Unincorporated 15,735 15,255 -3.1
Los Angeles 9,900,914 9,837,286 -0.6
Agoura Hills 19,682 19,565 -0.6
Alhambra 82,728 82,544 -0.2
Arcadia 56,329 57,095 1.4
Artesia 16,252 16,205 -0.3
Avalon 3,461 3,447 -0.4
Azusa 48,668 48,549 -0.2
Baldwin Park 70,800 70,729 -0.1
Bell 33,331 33,211 -0.4
Bellflower 76,449 76,203 -0.3
Bell Gardens 38,679 38,484 -0.5
Beverly Hills 32,209 32,116 -0.3
Bradbury 905 901 -0.4
Burbank 105,713 106,229 0.5
Calabasas 22,882 22,763 -0.5
Carson 92,206 91,790 -0.5
Cerritos 47,831 47,554 -0.6
Claremont 38,372 38,262 -0.3
Commerce 12,183 12,145 -0.3
Compton 94,182 93,937 -0.3
Covina 51,066 50,918 -0.3
Cudahy 22,232 22,234 0.0
Culver City 40,640 40,730 0.2
Diamond Bar 53,796 53,538 -0.5
Downey 112,442 112,279 -0.1
Duarte 23,637 24,841 5.1
El Monte 108,315 108,192 -0.1
El Segundo 17,000 16,950 -0.3
Gardena 60,644 61,187 0.9
Glendale 193,810 193,286 -0.3
Glendora 51,300 51,232 -0.1
Hawaiian Gardens 13,564 13,529 -0.3
Hawthorne 85,865 85,515 -0.4
Hermosa Beach 19,250 19,196 -0.3
Hidden Hills 1,741 1,738 -0.2
Huntington Park 53,182 52,961 -0.4
Industry 420 420 0.0
Inglewood 106,645 105,986 -0.6
Irwindale 1,511 1,502 -0.6
La Cañada
Flintridge 20,071 19,994 -0.4
La Habra Heights 5,529 5,493 -0.7
Lakewood 80,718 80,585 -0.2
La Mirada 48,234 47,998 -0.5
Lancaster 177,170 178,159 0.6
La Puente 37,388 37,237 -0.4
La Verne 31,555 31,466 -0.3
Lawndale 31,072 31,130 0.2
Lomita 20,510 20,450 -0.3
Long Beach 462,968 462,193 -0.2
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Los Angeles 3,839,536 3,806,201 -0.9
Lynwood 66,675 66,901 0.3
Malibu 10,672 9,637 -9.7
Manhattan Beach 34,508 34,333 -0.5
Maywood 24,585 24,448 -0.6
Monrovia 39,177 39,094 -0.2
Montebello 62,619 62,994 0.6
Monterey Park 59,898 59,649 -0.4
Norwalk 101,780 101,453 -0.3
Palmdale 166,554 166,118 -0.3
Palos Verdes
Estates 13,079 13,016 -0.5
Paramount 52,560 52,353 -0.4
Pasadena 141,466 141,145 -0.2
Pico Rivera 61,219 60,966 -0.4
Pomona 154,762 154,680 -0.1
Rancho Palos
Verdes 41,111 40,893 -0.5
Redondo Beach 68,528 68,460 -0.1
Rolling Hills 1,681 1,677 -0.2
Rolling Hills Estates 8,601 8,739 1.6
Rosemead 51,233 51,295 0.1
San Dimas 34,064 33,915 -0.4
San Fernando 24,025 23,976 -0.2
San Gabriel 39,393 39,838 1.1
San Marino 12,503 12,513 0.1
Santa Clarita 232,635 232,883 0.1
Santa Fe Springs 18,971 19,229 1.4
Santa Monica 93,876 94,237 0.4
Sierra Madre 10,989 10,899 -0.8
Signal Hill 11,430 11,366 -0.6
South El Monte 19,493 19,489 0.0
South Gate 93,411 93,467 0.1
South Pasadena 26,492 26,380 -0.4
Temple City 36,567 36,584 0.0
Torrance 144,041 143,363 -0.5
Vernon 205 204 -0.5
Walnut 28,310 28,623 1.1
West Covina 109,546 108,937 -0.6
West Hollywood 35,418 35,283 -0.4
Westlake Village 8,219 8,167 -0.6
Whittier 88,327 88,029 -0.3
Unincorporated 1,007,618 983,184 -2.4
Madera 165,277 166,407 0.7
Chowchilla 18,982 19,057 0.4
Madera 68,458 67,759 -1.0
Unincorporated 77,837 79,591 2.3
Marin 253,171 250,823 -0.9
Belvedere 2,073 2,058 -0.7
Corte Madera 9,991 9,910 -0.8
Fairfax 7,463 7,414 -0.7
Larkspur 12,772 12,650 -1.0
Mill Valley 13,803 13,694 -0.8
Novato 52,198 51,638 -1.1
Ross 2,315 2,324 0.4
San Anselmo 12,587 12,474 -0.9
San Rafael 60,184 59,890 -0.5
Sausalito 6,926 6,878 -0.7
Tiburon 8,912 8,841 -0.8
Unincorporated 63,947 63,052 -1.4
Mariposa 16,920 16,846 -0.4
Mendocino 89,325 88,591 -0.8
Fort Bragg 7,207 7,142 -0.9
Point Arena 455 450 -1.1
Ukiah 16,290 16,138 -0.9
Willits 4,841 4,800 -0.8
Unincorporated 60,532 60,061 -0.8
Merced 294,342 294,154 -0.1
Atwater 31,993 31,806 -0.6
Dos Palos 5,736 5,685 -0.9
Gustine 6,005 5,955 -0.8
Livingston 14,512 14,402 -0.8
Los Banos 49,091 49,255 0.3
Merced 98,655 99,435 0.8
Unincorporated 88,350 87,616 -0.8
Modoc 8,490 8,467 -0.3
Alturas 2,772 2,769 -0.1
Unincorporated 5,718 5,698 -0.3
Mono 12,548 12,482 -0.5
Mammoth Lakes 7,083 7,035 -0.7
Unincorporated 5,465 5,447 -0.3
Monterey 437,465 436,755 -0.2
Carmel-by-the-Sea 3,115 3,102 -0.4
Del Rey Oaks 1,546 1,539 -0.5
Gonzales 8,423 8,398 -0.3
Greenfield 20,552 20,918 1.8
King City 14,245 14,369 0.9
Marina 22,938 23,322 1.7
Monterey 27,198 27,504 1.1
Pacific Grove 14,974 14,894 -0.5
Salinas 160,784 159,866 -0.6
Sand City 384 381 -0.8
Seaside 31,733 31,681 -0.2
Soledad 27,378 27,065 -1.1
Unincorporated 104,195 103,716 -0.5
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Napa 136,620 136,374 -0.2
American Canyon 22,588 22,619 0.1
Calistoga 5,162 5,282 2.3
Napa 78,045 77,803 -0.3
St. Helena 5,339 5,317 -0.4
Yountville 2,618 2,567 -1.9
Unincorporated 22,868 22,786 -0.4
Nevada 100,445 99,983 -0.5
Grass Valley 13,326 13,238 -0.7
Nevada City 3,318 3,325 0.2
Truckee 16,895 16,891 0.0
Unincorporated 66,906 66,529 -0.6
Orange 3,175,509 3,163,696 -0.4
Aliso Viejo 50,419 49,945 -0.9
Anaheim 340,635 340,433 -0.1
Brea 48,082 47,656 -0.9
Buena Park 83,219 82,850 -0.4
Costa Mesa 110,313 109,436 -0.8
Cypress 49,826 49,495 -0.7
Dana Point 32,539 32,268 -0.8
Fountain Valley 56,769 56,596 -0.3
Fullerton 140,901 140,224 -0.5
Garden Grove 171,668 171,077 -0.3
Huntington Beach 192,787 191,498 -0.7
Irvine 317,652 317,744 0.0
Laguna Beach 22,549 22,440 -0.5
Laguna Hills 30,547 30,275 -0.9
Laguna Niguel 65,167 64,590 -0.9
Laguna Woods 17,132 16,970 -0.9
La Habra 61,524 61,269 -0.4
Lake Forest 88,017 87,522 -0.6
La Palma 15,184 15,045 -0.9
Los Alamitos 12,030 11,951 -0.7
Mission Viejo 91,219 90,401 -0.9
Newport Beach 83,041 82,306 -0.9
Orange 141,825 141,063 -0.5
Placentia 53,723 53,613 -0.2
Rancho Santa
Margarita 46,657 46,217 -0.9
San Clemente 63,133 62,636 -0.8
San Juan
Capistrano 35,491 35,331 -0.5
Santa Ana 312,796 312,808 0.0
Seal Beach 24,696 24,496 -0.8
Stanton 40,600 41,415 2.0
Tustin 79,650 79,175 -0.6
Villa Park 5,757 5,741 -0.3
Westminster 90,625 90,490 -0.1
Yorba Linda 66,566 66,190 -0.6
Unincorporated 132,770 132,530 -0.2
Placer 428,880 434,823 1.4
Auburn 13,532 13,506 -0.2
Colfax 2,031 2,020 -0.5
Lincoln 55,431 56,494 1.9
Loomis 6,824 6,822 0.0
Rocklin 74,483 74,842 0.5
Roseville 161,162 165,455 2.7
Unincorporated 115,417 115,684 0.2
Plumas 18,703 18,471 -1.2
Portola 2,121 2,087 -1.6
Unincorporated 16,582 16,384 -1.2
Riverside 2,497,829 2,506,824 0.4
Banning 31,532 32,323 2.5
Beaumont 59,710 59,896 0.3
Blythe 15,740 15,878 0.9
Calimesa 11,029 10,942 -0.8
Canyon Lake 10,987 10,908 -0.7
Cathedral City 51,715 51,458 -0.5
Coachella 44,624 45,300 1.5
Corona 159,873 159,309 -0.4
Desert Hot Springs 33,432 33,629 0.6
Eastvale 69,987 70,575 0.8
Hemet 91,839 91,479 -0.4
Indian Wells 4,839 4,807 -0.7
Indio 92,552 92,360 -0.2
Jurupa Valley 106,178 105,349 -0.8
Lake Elsinore 73,637 74,483 1.1
La Quinta 38,934 38,815 -0.3
Menifee 115,813 117,847 1.8
Moreno Valley 210,740 211,365 0.3
Murrieta 111,951 112,315 0.3
Norco 25,050 23,276 -7.1
Palm Desert 51,662 52,326 1.3
Palm Springs 44,120 43,893 -0.5
Perris 81,100 81,027 -0.1
Rancho Mirage 17,137 17,318 1.1
Riverside 321,263 321,884 0.2
San Jacinto 54,815 55,900 2.0
Temecula 112,662 113,618 0.8
Wildomar 37,373 38,841 3.9
Unincorporated 417,535 419,703 0.5
Sacramento 1,619,023 1,628,349 0.6
Citrus Heights 87,239 86,487 -0.9
Elk Grove 184,495 188,319 2.1
Folsom 93,679 95,680 2.1
Galt 26,692 27,133 1.7
Isleton 772 764 -1.0
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Rancho Cordova 85,789 87,312 1.8
Sacramento 532,956 539,765 1.3
Unincorporated 607,401 602,889 -0.7
San Benito 67,641 68,111 0.7
Hollister 43,985 44,233 0.6
San Juan Bautista 2,085 2,081 -0.2
Unincorporated 21,571 21,797 1.0
San Bernardino 2,215,490 2,216,685 0.1
Adelanto 37,298 36,652 -1.7
Apple Valley 75,640 75,236 -0.5
Barstow 24,969 24,727 -1.0
Big Bear Lake 4,959 4,920 -0.8
Chino 95,655 95,946 0.3
Chino Hills 77,626 77,191 -0.6
Colton 53,219 52,844 -0.7
Fontana 218,460 219,774 0.6
Grand Terrace 12,933 12,817 -0.9
Hesperia 102,613 103,349 0.7
Highland 56,997 56,655 -0.6
Loma Linda 25,445 25,400 -0.2
Montclair 37,557 38,378 2.2
Needles 4,789 4,796 0.1
Ontario 185,346 187,863 1.4
Rancho
Cucamonga 176,846 176,418 -0.2
Redlands 74,013 73,811 -0.3
Rialto 106,104 106,809 0.7
San Bernardino 223,313 222,292 -0.5
Twentynine Palms 25,215 27,166 7.7
Upland 78,996 78,406 -0.7
Victorville 141,098 139,680 -1.0
Yucaipa 55,008 54,711 -0.5
Yucca Valley 21,952 21,798 -0.7
Unincorporated 299,439 299,046 -0.1
San Diego 3,339,392 3,344,322 0.1
Carlsbad 116,022 115,867 -0.1
Chula Vista 281,850 282,999 0.4
Coronado 22,687 23,796 4.9
Del Mar 3,937 3,917 -0.5
El Cajon 105,449 104,932 -0.5
Encinitas 62,392 62,193 -0.3
Escondido 151,932 152,196 0.2
Imperial Beach 26,362 26,066 -1.1
La Mesa 61,863 61,707 -0.3
Lemon Grove 28,445 28,233 -0.7
National City 58,649 58,701 0.1
Oceanside 175,193 174,027 -0.7
Poway 50,699 50,263 -0.9
San Diego 1,409,429 1,419,531 0.7
San Marcos 97,647 97,554 -0.1
Santee 60,044 59,812 -0.4
Solana Beach 13,060 12,941 -0.9
Vista 101,934 101,365 -0.6
Unincorporated 511,798 508,222 -0.7
San Francisco 844,394 845,658 0.1
San Joaquin 814,956 820,125 0.6
Escalon 7,359 7,304 -0.7
Lathrop 38,791 40,942 5.5
Lodi 68,468 68,513 0.1
Manteca 94,951 96,511 1.6
Mountain House 29,048 30,687 5.6
Ripon 15,996 15,873 -0.8
Stockton 323,077 322,436 -0.2
Tracy 98,776 99,705 0.9
Unincorporated 138,490 138,154 -0.2
San Luis Obispo 279,666 279,242 -0.2
Arroyo Grande 17,922 17,780 -0.8
Atascadero 30,223 30,184 -0.1
El Paso de Robles 31,151 31,525 1.2
Grover Beach 12,541 12,502 -0.3
Morro Bay 10,379 10,307 -0.7
Pismo Beach 7,836 7,773 -0.8
San Luis Obispo 49,849 50,165 0.6
Unincorporated 119,765 119,006 -0.6
San Mateo 748,412 748,182 0.0
Atherton 7,012 7,086 1.1
Belmont 28,243 28,129 -0.4
Brisbane 4,678 4,662 -0.3
Burlingame 31,568 32,438 2.8
Colma 1,410 1,405 -0.4
Daly City 102,215 101,898 -0.3
East Palo Alto 29,148 29,462 1.1
Foster City 32,547 32,364 -0.6
Half Moon Bay 11,309 11,406 0.9
Hillsborough 11,301 11,249 -0.5
Menlo Park 33,326 33,785 1.4
Millbrae 23,171 23,062 -0.5
Pacifica 37,246 37,073 -0.5
Portola Valley 4,328 4,325 -0.1
Redwood City 82,109 81,809 -0.4
San Bruno 42,567 42,411 -0.4
San Carlos 29,362 29,249 -0.4
San Mateo 104,361 104,020 -0.3
South San Francisco 65,431 65,239 -0.3
Woodside 5,206 5,224 0.3
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Unincorporated 61,874 61,886 0.0
Santa Barbara 445,292 444,974 -0.1
Buellton 5,077 5,353 5.4
Carpinteria 12,742 12,612 -1.0
Goleta 32,725 32,409 -1.0
Guadalupe 8,721 8,649 -0.8
Lompoc 43,302 43,073 -0.5
Santa Barbara 85,752 85,083 -0.8
Santa Maria 111,356 113,041 1.5
Solvang 5,680 5,621 -1.0
Unincorporated 139,937 139,133 -0.6
Santa Clara 1,928,029 1,932,468 0.2
Campbell 43,262 43,195 -0.2
Cupertino 59,962 59,765 -0.3
Gilroy 62,312 62,193 -0.2
Los Altos 31,972 31,921 -0.2
Los Altos Hills 8,604 8,652 0.6
Los Gatos 33,440 33,293 -0.4
Milpitas 81,821 82,107 0.3
Monte Sereno 3,642 3,642 0.0
Morgan Hill 46,901 47,074 0.4
Mountain View 86,944 88,533 1.8
Palo Alto 68,919 69,004 0.1
San Jose 983,264 980,434 -0.3
Santa Clara 134,088 138,011 2.9
Saratoga 31,253 31,261 0.0
Sunnyvale 159,955 161,884 1.2
Unincorporated 91,690 91,499 -0.2
Santa Cruz 262,693 261,069 -0.6
Capitola 9,697 9,669 -0.3
Santa Cruz 62,999 63,065 0.1
Scotts Valley 11,699 11,578 -1.0
Watsonville 50,826 50,454 -0.7
Unincorporated 127,472 126,303 -0.9
Shasta 182,263 181,934 -0.2
Anderson 11,081 11,050 -0.3
Redding 94,240 94,294 0.1
Shasta Lake 10,238 10,195 -0.4
Unincorporated 66,704 66,395 -0.5
Sierra 3,167 3,153 -0.4
Loyalton 763 756 -0.9
Unincorporated 2,404 2,397 -0.3
Siskiyou 43,300 43,153 -0.3
Dorris 820 816 -0.5
Dunsmuir 1,621 1,612 -0.6
Etna 658 655 -0.5
Fort Jones 663 659 -0.6
Montague 1,179 1,173 -0.5
Mount Shasta 3,145 3,130 -0.5
Tulelake 859 854 -0.6
Weed 2,704 2,693 -0.4
Yreka 7,767 7,709 -0.7
Unincorporated 23,884 23,852 -0.1
Solano 453,579 452,050 -0.3
Benicia 26,315 26,074 -0.9
Dixon 20,380 20,567 0.9
Fairfield 122,063 121,389 -0.6
Rio Vista 10,382 10,345 -0.4
Suisun City 29,405 29,720 1.1
Vacaville 103,743 103,195 -0.5
Vallejo 123,140 122,702 -0.4
Unincorporated 18,151 18,058 -0.5
Sonoma 484,764 484,022 -0.2
Cloverdale 8,729 8,719 -0.1
Cotati 7,325 7,264 -0.8
Healdsburg 11,156 11,205 0.4
Petaluma 59,395 59,160 -0.4
Rohnert Park 44,318 44,191 -0.3
Santa Rosa 178,786 179,798 0.6
Sebastopol 7,407 7,350 -0.8
Sonoma 10,575 10,528 -0.4
Windsor 25,650 25,498 -0.6
Unincorporated 131,423 130,309 -0.8
Stanislaus 558,243 557,159 -0.2
Ceres 49,318 49,075 -0.5
Hughson 8,046 8,255 2.6
Modesto 220,526 220,048 -0.2
Newman 12,442 12,362 -0.6
Oakdale 23,367 23,489 0.5
Patterson 26,108 26,386 1.1
Riverbank 26,200 26,594 1.5
Turlock 72,727 72,592 -0.2
Waterford 9,278 9,261 -0.2
Unincorporated 110,231 109,097 -1.0
Sutter 101,270 101,679 0.4
Live Oak 9,745 9,755 0.1
Yuba City 71,205 71,572 0.5
Unincorporated 20,320 20,352 0.2
Tehama 64,945 64,764 -0.3
Corning 8,205 8,179 -0.3
Red Bluff 14,428 14,422 0.0
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1: City/County/State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Tehama 425 423 -0.5
Unincorporated 41,887 41,740 -0.4
Trinity 15,890 15,844 -0.3
Tulare 488,798 489,610 0.2
Dinuba 26,149 26,566 1.6
Exeter 10,305 10,287 -0.2
Farmersville 10,406 10,338 -0.7
Lindsay 12,823 12,712 -0.9
Porterville 63,899 63,719 -0.3
Tulare 72,495 72,936 0.6
Visalia 147,991 148,302 0.2
Woodlake 8,038 8,168 1.6
Unincorporated 136,692 136,582 -0.1
Tuolumne 54,370 54,233 -0.3
Sonora 5,253 5,280 0.5
Unincorporated 49,117 48,953 -0.3
Ventura 828,983 824,306 -0.6
Camarillo 68,973 68,764 -0.3
Fillmore 17,125 16,992 -0.8
Moorpark 34,573 34,161 -1.2
Ojai 7,579 7,501 -1.0
Oxnard 199,319 198,557 -0.4
Port Hueneme 20,849 21,103 1.2
San Buenaventura 108,325 108,061 -0.2
Santa Paula 31,738 31,976 0.7
Simi Valley 125,093 123,842 -1.0
Thousand Oaks 122,688 121,286 -1.1
Unincorporated 92,721 92,063 -0.7
Yolo 225,554 225,904 0.2
Davis 65,712 66,002 0.4
West Sacramento 55,376 55,871 0.9
Winters 8,007 8,028 0.3
Woodland 61,693 61,324 -0.6
Unincorporated 34,766 34,679 -0.3
Yuba 86,620 87,692 1.2
Marysville 12,730 12,679 -0.4
Wheatland 4,046 4,140 2.3
Unincorporated 69,844 70,873 1.5
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change CALIFORNIA 14,948,966 15,064,131 0.8
Alameda 652,678 656,619 0.6
Alameda 35,026 35,254 0.7
Albany 8,068 8,084 0.2
Berkeley 55,138 55,521 0.7
Dublin 26,521 26,744 0.8
Emeryville 8,373 8,469 1.1
Fremont 81,876 82,658 1.0
Hayward 54,439 54,549 0.2
Livermore 33,515 33,626 0.3
Newark 16,606 16,659 0.3
Oakland 191,411 192,719 0.7
Piedmont 4,005 4,019 0.3
Pleasanton 29,849 29,861 0.0
San Leandro 33,294 33,550 0.8
Union City 21,999 22,033 0.2
Unincorporated 52,558 52,873 0.6
Alpine 1,563 1,572 0.6
Amador 19,228 19,257 0.2
Amador 120 120 0.0
Ione 2,267 2,272 0.2
Jackson 2,425 2,425 0.0
Plymouth 535 535 0.0
Sutter Creek 1,433 1,433 0.0
Unincorporated 12,448 12,472 0.2
Butte 96,213 97,087 0.9
Biggs 705 705 0.0
Chico 48,624 49,014 0.8
Gridley 2,703 2,703 0.0
Oroville 8,303 8,305 0.0
Paradise 5,294 5,822 10.0
Unincorporated 30,584 30,538 -0.2
Calaveras 27,925 27,983 0.2
Angels City 1,920 1,923 0.2
Unincorporated 26,005 26,060 0.2
Colusa 8,279 8,387 1.3
Colusa 2,521 2,584 2.5
Williams 1,787 1,825 2.1
Unincorporated 3,971 3,978 0.2
Contra Costa 435,790 437,783 0.5
Antioch 38,827 39,022 0.5
Brentwood 22,517 22,601 0.4
Clayton 4,196 4,202 0.1
Concord 48,106 48,246 0.3
Danville 16,426 16,530 0.6
El Cerrito 11,367 11,405 0.3
Hercules 9,579 9,620 0.4
Lafayette 10,220 10,275 0.5
Martinez 15,608 15,626 0.1
Moraga 5,978 5,985 0.1
Oakley 14,994 15,090 0.6
Orinda 7,436 7,462 0.3
Pinole 7,128 7,348 3.1
Pittsburg 25,017 25,066 0.2
Pleasant Hill 14,604 14,809 1.4
Richmond 41,058 41,117 0.1
San Pablo 10,073 10,087 0.1
San Ramon 29,828 30,075 0.8
Walnut Creek 35,196 35,239 0.1
Unincorporated 67,632 67,978 0.5
Del Norte 11,372 11,603 2.0
Crescent City 1,915 2,101 9.7
Unincorporated 9,457 9,502 0.5
El Dorado 95,899 96,501 0.6
Placerville 4,935 4,958 0.5
South Lake Tahoe 16,137 16,235 0.6
Unincorporated 74,827 75,308 0.6
Fresno 352,020 355,371 1.0
Clovis 47,817 48,415 1.3
Coalinga 4,658 4,659 0.0
Firebaugh 2,421 2,492 2.9
Fowler 2,472 2,575 4.2
Fresno 191,543 193,578 1.1
Huron 1,839 1,839 0.0
Kerman 5,009 5,064 1.1
Kingsburg 4,797 4,841 0.9
Mendota 2,951 2,975 0.8
Orange Cove 2,533 2,539 0.2
Parlier 3,913 3,934 0.5
Reedley 7,809 7,934 1.6
Sanger 8,006 8,168 2.0
San Joaquin 937 937 0.0
Selma 7,309 7,349 0.5
Unincorporated 58,006 58,072 0.1
Glenn 11,225 11,247 0.2
Orland 3,132 3,146 0.4
Willows 2,534 2,537 0.1
Unincorporated 5,559 5,564 0.1
Humboldt 63,765 63,943 0.3
Arcata 8,932 8,961 0.3
Blue Lake 570 572 0.4
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Eureka 12,167 12,218 0.4
Ferndale 734 741 1.0
Fortuna 5,371 5,383 0.2
Rio Dell 1,443 1,444 0.1
Trinidad 231 231 0.0
Unincorporated 34,317 34,393 0.2
Imperial 59,169 59,626 0.8
Brawley 9,393 9,472 0.8
Calexico 11,190 11,283 0.8
Calipatria 1,131 1,135 0.4
El Centro 15,447 15,538 0.6
Holtville 1,843 1,842 -0.1
Imperial 6,990 7,118 1.8
Westmorland 676 676 0.0
Unincorporated 12,499 12,562 0.5
Inyo 9,555 9,561 0.1
Bishop 1,968 1,973 0.3
Unincorporated 7,587 7,588 0.0
Kern 313,255 316,018 0.9
Arvin 5,023 5,028 0.1
Bakersfield 140,294 141,957 1.2
California City 5,426 5,429 0.1
Delano 12,564 12,719 1.2
Maricopa 435 435 0.0
McFarland 3,615 3,671 1.5
Ridgecrest 12,737 12,803 0.5
Shafter 6,669 7,079 6.1
Taft 2,609 2,609 0.0
Tehachapi 3,869 3,892 0.6
Wasco 6,488 6,492 0.1
Unincorporated 113,526 113,904 0.3
Kings 48,045 48,564 1.1
Avenal 2,629 2,629 0.0
Corcoran 4,302 4,361 1.4
Hanford 21,245 21,634 1.8
Lemoore 9,774 9,837 0.6
Unincorporated 10,095 10,103 0.1
Lake 34,734 34,779 0.1
Clearlake 7,867 7,873 0.1
Lakeport 2,513 2,514 0.0
Unincorporated 24,354 24,392 0.2
Lassen 12,255 12,269 0.1
Susanville 4,292 4,301 0.2
Unincorporated 7,963 7,968 0.1
Los Angeles 3,726,653 3,742,631 0.4
Agoura Hills 7,730 7,734 0.1
Alhambra 32,354 32,492 0.4
Arcadia 20,869 21,296 2.0
Artesia 4,869 4,886 0.3
Avalon 2,201 2,206 0.2
Azusa 15,711 15,773 0.4
Baldwin Park 18,547 18,649 0.5
Bell 9,548 9,575 0.3
Bellflower 25,431 25,502 0.3
Bell Gardens 10,272 10,286 0.1
Beverly Hills 16,346 16,405 0.4
Bradbury 364 365 0.3
Burbank 46,743 47,279 1.1
Calabasas 9,401 9,413 0.1
Carson 28,060 28,114 0.2
Cerritos 16,388 16,399 0.1
Claremont 12,893 12,931 0.3
Commerce 3,565 3,577 0.3
Compton 24,992 25,089 0.4
Covina 17,927 17,991 0.4
Cudahy 5,898 5,937 0.7
Culver City 18,424 18,513 0.5
Diamond Bar 18,921 18,953 0.2
Downey 36,589 36,774 0.5
Duarte 8,667 9,214 6.3
El Monte 30,563 30,727 0.5
El Segundo 7,610 7,637 0.4
Gardena 22,908 23,267 1.6
Glendale 81,502 81,810 0.4
Glendora 18,815 18,912 0.5
Hawaiian Gardens 3,841 3,856 0.4
Hawthorne 31,746 31,822 0.2
Hermosa Beach 10,070 10,107 0.4
Hidden Hills 661 664 0.5
Huntington Park 15,567 15,603 0.2
Industry 74 74 0.0
Inglewood 39,810 39,818 0.0
Irwindale 439 439 0.0
La Cañada Flintridge 7,203 7,222 0.3
La Habra Heights 2,031 2,031 0.0
Lakewood 28,220 28,357 0.5
La Mirada 15,557 15,576 0.1
Lancaster 57,373 58,127 1.3
La Puente 10,143 10,168 0.2
La Verne 12,431 12,475 0.4
Lawndale 10,330 10,417 0.8
Lomita 8,648 8,679 0.4
Long Beach 184,499 185,425 0.5
Los Angeles 1,586,581 1,597,841 0.7
Lynwood 16,153 16,283 0.8
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Malibu 6,786 6,157 -9.3
Manhattan Beach 14,987 15,008 0.1
Maywood 6,735 6,741 0.1
Monrovia 16,214 16,285 0.4
Montebello 20,963 21,227 1.3
Monterey Park 21,684 21,734 0.2
Norwalk 28,786 28,865 0.3
Palmdale 50,684 50,881 0.4
Palos Verdes Estates 5,324 5,333 0.2
Paramount 15,006 15,044 0.3
Pasadena 63,960 64,226 0.4
Pico Rivera 17,614 17,655 0.2
Pomona 44,966 45,249 0.6
Rancho Palos Verdes 16,552 16,571 0.1
Redondo Beach 31,133 31,305 0.6
Rolling Hills 706 709 0.4
Rolling Hills Estates 3,401 3,479 2.3
Rosemead 15,346 15,465 0.8
San Dimas 13,151 13,178 0.2
San Fernando 6,781 6,811 0.4
San Gabriel 13,809 14,058 1.8
San Marino 4,588 4,622 0.7
Santa Clarita 82,437 83,064 0.8
Santa Fe Springs 6,247 6,375 2.0
Santa Monica 54,189 54,758 1.1
Sierra Madre 5,146 5,137 -0.2
Signal Hill 4,780 4,784 0.1
South El Monte 5,215 5,248 0.6
South Gate 26,108 26,294 0.7
South Pasadena 11,275 11,300 0.2
Temple City 12,552 12,640 0.7
Torrance 59,195 59,298 0.2
Vernon 78 78 0.0
Walnut 9,382 9,548 1.8
West Covina 35,864 35,896 0.1
West Hollywood 26,321 26,391 0.3
Westlake Village 3,569 3,569 0.0
Whittier 30,902 30,996 0.3
Unincorporated 318,732 313,962 -1.5
Madera 53,500 54,618 2.1
Chowchilla 4,569 4,606 0.8
Madera 18,944 18,972 0.1
Unincorporated 29,987 31,040 3.5
Marin 112,901 113,305 0.4
Belvedere 1,070 1,074 0.4
Corte Madera 4,227 4,240 0.3
Fairfax 3,528 3,544 0.5
Larkspur 6,523 6,533 0.2
Mill Valley 6,570 6,591 0.3
Novato 21,595 21,615 0.1
Ross 901 915 1.6
San Anselmo 5,621 5,633 0.2
San Rafael 24,784 24,940 0.6
Sausalito 4,455 4,474 0.4
Tiburon 4,086 4,099 0.3
Unincorporated 29,541 29,647 0.4
Mariposa 9,863 9,887 0.2
Mendocino 42,059 42,156 0.2
Fort Bragg 3,459 3,462 0.1
Point Arena 230 230 0.0
Ukiah 7,066 7,071 0.1
Willits 2,169 2,172 0.1
Unincorporated 29,135 29,221 0.3
Merced 92,928 93,740 0.9
Atwater 10,487 10,519 0.3
Dos Palos 1,804 1,804 0.0
Gustine 2,158 2,159 0.0
Livingston 3,887 3,892 0.1
Los Banos 14,432 14,610 1.2
Merced 32,369 32,960 1.8
Unincorporated 27,791 27,796 0.0
Modoc 4,771 4,772 0.0
Alturas 1,396 1,397 0.1
Unincorporated 3,375 3,375 0.0
Mono 13,809 13,937 0.9
Mammoth Lakes 9,549 9,676 1.3
Unincorporated 4,260 4,261 0.0
Monterey 147,790 148,588 0.5
Carmel-by-the-Sea 3,459 3,472 0.4
Del Rey Oaks 749 752 0.4
Gonzales 2,106 2,117 0.5
Greenfield 4,878 5,006 2.6
King City 3,791 3,856 1.7
Marina 8,703 8,740 0.4
Monterey 13,866 13,957 0.7
Pacific Grove 8,252 8,274 0.3
Salinas 45,260 45,361 0.2
Sand City 197 197 0.0
Seaside 10,893 11,026 1.2
Soledad 4,865 4,920 1.1
Unincorporated 40,771 40,910 0.3
Napa 56,839 57,302 0.8
American Canyon 6,957 7,035 1.1
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Calistoga 2,443 2,525 3.4
Napa 32,265 32,475 0.7
St. Helena 2,891 2,907 0.6
Yountville 1,361 1,372 0.8
Unincorporated 10,922 10,988 0.6
Nevada 54,877 55,156 0.5
Grass Valley 6,867 6,885 0.3
Nevada City 1,706 1,712 0.4
Truckee 14,011 14,143 0.9
Unincorporated 32,293 32,416 0.4
Orange 1,163,879 1,170,029 0.5
Aliso Viejo 20,189 20,190 0.0
Anaheim 113,602 114,627 0.9
Brea 18,719 18,731 0.1
Buena Park 26,086 26,219 0.5
Costa Mesa 44,610 44,673 0.1
Cypress 17,145 17,194 0.3
Dana Point 16,557 16,576 0.1
Fountain Valley 20,035 20,166 0.7
Fullerton 50,791 50,998 0.4
Garden Grove 50,273 50,580 0.6
Huntington Beach 83,348 83,585 0.3
Irvine 128,153 129,428 1.0
Laguna Beach 13,183 13,245 0.5
Laguna Hills 11,439 11,445 0.1
Laguna Niguel 28,452 28,470 0.1
Laguna Woods 13,414 13,414 0.0
La Habra 20,981 21,095 0.5
Lake Forest 32,173 32,299 0.4
La Palma 5,278 5,280 0.0
Los Alamitos 4,558 4,571 0.3
Mission Viejo 35,367 35,384 0.0
Newport Beach 45,132 45,161 0.1
Orange 48,301 48,441 0.3
Placentia 18,674 18,815 0.8
Rancho Santa
Margarita 17,607 17,609 0.0
San Clemente 26,962 27,006 0.2
San Juan Capistrano 12,847 12,912 0.5
Santa Ana 84,070 84,937 1.0
Seal Beach 14,677 14,691 0.1
Stanton 12,643 13,024 3.0
Tustin 28,737 28,795 0.2
Villa Park 2,040 2,054 0.7
Westminster 28,588 28,820 0.8
Yorba Linda 23,801 23,894 0.4
Unincorporated 45,447 45,700 0.6
Placer 187,722 191,225 1.9
Auburn 6,451 6,474 0.4
Colfax 965 965 0.0
Lincoln 22,474 23,033 2.5
Loomis 2,627 2,641 0.5
Rocklin 28,093 28,387 1.0
Roseville 64,808 66,914 3.2
Unincorporated 62,304 62,811 0.8
Plumas 14,967 15,029 0.4
Portola 1,076 1,076 0.0
Unincorporated 13,891 13,953 0.4
Riverside 893,267 904,277 1.2
Banning 12,605 13,051 3.5
Beaumont 19,738 19,974 1.2
Blythe 5,248 5,248 0.0
Calimesa 4,646 4,650 0.1
Canyon Lake 4,606 4,613 0.2
Cathedral City 23,170 23,257 0.4
Coachella 10,867 11,129 2.4
Corona 51,256 51,523 0.5
Desert Hot Springs 12,128 12,307 1.5
Eastvale 18,470 18,789 1.7
Hemet 37,270 37,449 0.5
Indian Wells 5,391 5,402 0.2
Indio 36,673 36,918 0.7
Jurupa Valley 29,526 29,551 0.1
Lake Elsinore 22,470 22,929 2.0
La Quinta 24,700 24,841 0.6
Menifee 42,096 43,213 2.7
Moreno Valley 59,137 59,834 1.2
Murrieta 37,823 38,280 1.2
Norco 7,282 7,355 1.0
Palm Desert 37,279 38,093 2.2
Palm Springs 35,950 36,077 0.4
Perris 20,573 20,735 0.8
Rancho Mirage 15,039 15,332 1.9
Riverside 102,481 103,040 0.5
San Jacinto 16,534 17,011 2.9
Temecula 38,654 39,325 1.7
Wildomar 12,048 12,632 4.8
Unincorporated 149,607 151,719 1.4
Sacramento 612,589 622,665 1.6
Citrus Heights 36,325 36,388 0.2
Elk Grove 60,068 61,954 3.1
Folsom 34,581 35,837 3.6
Galt 8,882 9,125 2.7
Isleton 388 388 0.0
Rancho Cordova 31,914 32,825 2.9
Sacramento 211,028 216,076 2.4
Unincorporated 229,403 230,072 0.3
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change San Benito 22,261 22,465 0.9
Hollister 13,385 13,488 0.8
San Juan Bautista 916 916 0.0
Unincorporated 7,960 8,061 1.3
San Bernardino 758,120 764,801 0.9
Adelanto 9,836 9,873 0.4
Apple Valley 27,485 27,614 0.5
Barstow 9,619 9,626 0.1
Big Bear Lake 9,592 9,613 0.2
Chino 29,557 29,983 1.4
Chino Hills 26,235 26,352 0.4
Colton 16,813 16,863 0.3
Fontana 59,881 60,852 1.6
Grand Terrace 4,905 4,910 0.1
Hesperia 31,666 32,216 1.7
Highland 17,523 17,594 0.4
Loma Linda 10,457 10,544 0.8
Montclair 10,904 11,258 3.2
Needles 2,734 2,766 1.2
Ontario 57,621 59,000 2.4
Rancho Cucamonga 62,448 62,828 0.6
Redlands 28,318 28,516 0.7
Rialto 28,990 29,479 1.7
San Bernardino 67,420 67,771 0.5
Twentynine Palms 9,606 9,673 0.7
Upland 29,335 29,409 0.3
Victorville 41,410 41,563 0.4
Yucaipa 20,641 20,736 0.5
Yucca Valley 10,147 10,177 0.3
Unincorporated 134,977 135,585 0.5
San Diego 1,280,893 1,295,082 1.1
Carlsbad 48,888 49,379 1.0
Chula Vista 91,485 92,878 1.5
Coronado 9,646 9,666 0.2
Del Mar 2,641 2,658 0.6
El Cajon 37,011 37,245 0.6
Encinitas 27,118 27,339 0.8
Escondido 50,883 51,554 1.3
Imperial Beach 10,269 10,325 0.5
La Mesa 26,851 27,088 0.9
Lemon Grove 9,812 9,849 0.4
National City 18,298 18,524 1.2
Oceanside 69,097 69,417 0.5
Poway 17,773 17,819 0.3
San Diego 581,050 589,685 1.5
San Marcos 33,157 33,455 0.9
Santee 22,458 22,614 0.7
Solana Beach 6,736 6,751 0.2
Vista 34,384 34,578 0.6
Unincorporated 183,336 184,258 0.5
San Francisco 422,007 423,517 0.4
San Joaquin 269,626 273,498 1.4
Escalon 2,736 2,739 0.1
Lathrop 11,563 12,370 7.0
Lodi 26,102 26,346 0.9
Manteca 32,235 33,044 2.5
Mountain House 8,968 9,618 7.2
Ripon 5,778 5,783 0.1
Stockton 105,076 105,640 0.5
Tracy 31,376 31,947 1.8
Unincorporated 45,792 46,011 0.5
San Luis Obispo 127,921 128,942 0.8
Arroyo Grande 8,122 8,144 0.3
Atascadero 12,527 12,638 0.9
El Paso de Robles 12,714 13,007 2.3
Grover Beach 5,955 6,000 0.8
Morro Bay 6,640 6,665 0.4
Pismo Beach 5,900 5,916 0.3
San Luis Obispo 23,804 24,218 1.7
Unincorporated 52,259 52,354 0.2
San Mateo 292,078 293,682 0.5
Atherton 2,587 2,632 1.7
Belmont 11,786 11,807 0.2
Brisbane 2,080 2,085 0.2
Burlingame 13,991 14,467 3.4
Colma 526 527 0.2
Daly City 34,271 34,366 0.3
East Palo Alto 8,273 8,412 1.7
Foster City 13,816 13,819 0.0
Half Moon Bay 4,889 4,960 1.5
Hillsborough 4,095 4,100 0.1
Menlo Park 14,209 14,498 2.0
Millbrae 9,065 9,075 0.1
Pacifica 14,829 14,847 0.1
Portola Valley 1,944 1,954 0.5
Redwood City 33,516 33,575 0.2
San Bruno 16,933 16,970 0.2
San Carlos 12,373 12,398 0.2
San Mateo 43,817 43,932 0.3
South San Francisco 23,545 23,614 0.3
Woodside 2,235 2,256 0.9
Unincorporated 23,298 23,388 0.4
Santa Barbara 163,361 164,939 1.0
Buellton 2,086 2,226 6.7
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Carpinteria 5,742 5,752 0.2
Goleta 13,155 13,184 0.2
Guadalupe 2,425 2,434 0.4
Lompoc 14,735 14,752 0.1
Santa Barbara 39,051 39,208 0.4
Santa Maria 31,860 32,737 2.8
Solvang 2,666 2,670 0.2
Unincorporated 51,641 51,976 0.6
Santa Clara 709,914 718,680 1.2
Campbell 18,575 18,667 0.5
Cupertino 21,942 22,012 0.3
Gilroy 19,363 19,450 0.4
Los Altos 12,056 12,115 0.5
Los Altos Hills 3,197 3,236 1.2
Los Gatos 14,043 14,072 0.2
Milpitas 26,008 26,259 1.0
Monte Sereno 1,384 1,393 0.7
Morgan Hill 16,387 16,555 1.0
Mountain View 40,534 41,661 2.8
Palo Alto 29,645 29,876 0.8
San Jose 348,673 350,935 0.6
Santa Clara 54,109 56,881 5.1
Saratoga 11,504 11,582 0.7
Sunnyvale 64,268 65,652 2.2
Unincorporated 28,226 28,334 0.4
Santa Cruz 108,393 108,787 0.4
Capitola 5,522 5,568 0.8
Santa Cruz 24,873 25,066 0.8
Scotts Valley 5,032 5,036 0.1
Watsonville 15,022 15,079 0.4
Unincorporated 57,944 58,038 0.2
Shasta 81,115 81,407 0.4
Anderson 4,789 4,799 0.2
Redding 41,184 41,452 0.7
Shasta Lake 4,426 4,429 0.1
Unincorporated 30,716 30,727 0.0
Sierra 2,142 2,154 0.6
Loyalton 343 343 0.0
Unincorporated 1,799 1,811 0.7
Siskiyou 23,327 23,386 0.3
Dorris 365 365 0.0
Dunsmuir 1,087 1,087 0.0
Etna 355 355 0.0
Fort Jones 330 330 0.0
Montague 572 572 0.0
Mount Shasta 1,936 1,937 0.1
Tulelake 360 360 0.0
Weed 1,233 1,234 0.1
Yreka 3,827 3,829 0.1
Unincorporated 13,262 13,317 0.4
Solano 167,815 168,679 0.5
Benicia 11,403 11,406 0.0
Dixon 7,241 7,377 1.9
Fairfield 42,685 42,876 0.4
Rio Vista 5,553 5,586 0.6
Suisun City 9,769 9,968 2.0
Vacaville 38,011 38,092 0.2
Vallejo 45,829 46,024 0.4
Unincorporated 7,324 7,350 0.4
Sonoma 212,457 214,186 0.8
Cloverdale 3,573 3,600 0.8
Cotati 3,246 3,247 0.0
Healdsburg 5,185 5,253 1.3
Petaluma 25,003 25,120 0.5
Rohnert Park 18,705 18,814 0.6
Santa Rosa 73,671 74,761 1.5
Sebastopol 3,671 3,674 0.1
Sonoma 5,779 5,803 0.4
Windsor 9,905 9,932 0.3
Unincorporated 63,719 63,982 0.4
Stanislaus 187,534 188,510 0.5
Ceres 13,880 13,880 0.0
Hughson 2,699 2,790 3.4
Modesto 78,229 78,627 0.5
Newman 3,811 3,815 0.1
Oakdale 8,611 8,722 1.3
Patterson 7,501 7,638 1.8
Riverbank 8,013 8,196 2.3
Turlock 25,646 25,786 0.5
Waterford 2,794 2,810 0.6
Unincorporated 36,350 36,246 -0.3
Sutter 35,052 35,169 0.3
Live Oak 3,023 3,025 0.1
Yuba City 24,373 24,479 0.4
Unincorporated 7,656 7,665 0.1
Tehama 27,507 27,511 0.0
Corning 3,004 3,006 0.1
Red Bluff 6,122 6,124 0.0
Tehama 191 191 0.0
Unincorporated 18,190 18,190 0.0
Trinity 8,097 8,099 0.0
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
E-1H: City/County/State Housing Estimates with Annual Percent Change January 1, 2025 and 2026
Total Population Percent Total Population Percent
JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change JURISDICTION 1/1/25 1/1/26 Change Tulare 158,315 160,012 1.1
Dinuba 7,422 7,612 2.6
Exeter 3,699 3,727 0.8
Farmersville 2,843 2,851 0.3
Lindsay 3,649 3,651 0.1
Porterville 19,492 19,605 0.6
Tulare 23,125 23,484 1.6
Visalia 51,461 52,053 1.2
Woodlake 2,456 2,519 2.6
Unincorporated 44,168 44,510 0.8
Tuolumne 31,685 31,664 -0.1
Sonora 2,528 2,530 0.1
Unincorporated 29,157 29,134 -0.1
Ventura 300,868 302,619 0.6
Camarillo 28,236 28,515 1.0
Fillmore 5,161 5,187 0.5
Moorpark 11,872 11,883 0.1
Ojai 3,571 3,579 0.2
Oxnard 58,252 58,781 0.9
Port Hueneme 8,315 8,331 0.2
San Buenaventura 46,071 46,526 1.0
Santa Paula 9,903 10,107 2.1
Simi Valley 45,272 45,398 0.3
Thousand Oaks 48,493 48,552 0.1
Unincorporated 35,722 35,760 0.1
Yolo 85,068 86,085 1.2
Davis 28,151 28,578 1.5
West Sacramento 21,994 22,426 2.0
Winters 3,016 3,056 1.3
Woodland 23,176 23,282 0.5
Unincorporated 8,731 8,743 0.1
Yuba 32,026 32,770 2.3
Marysville 5,099 5,099 0.0
Wheatland 1,544 1,588 2.8
Unincorporated 25,383 26,083 2.8
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Top 10 Cities Based on Housing Unit Growth
Total Numeric Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Los Angeles Los Angeles 11,260
2 San Diego San Diego 8,635
3 Sacramento Sacramento 5,048
4 Santa Clara Santa Clara 2,772
5 San Jose Santa Clara 2,262
6 Roseville Placer 2,106
7 Fresno Fresno 2,035
8 Elk Grove Sacramento 1,886
9 Bakersfield Kern 1,663
10 San Francisco San Francisco 1,510
Numeric Single Family Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Los Angeles Los Angeles 4,266
2 San Diego San Diego 2,456
3 Sacramento Sacramento 1,766
4 Bakersfield Kern 1,432
5 Roseville Placer 1,151
6 Elk Grove Sacramento 1,138
7 Fresno Fresno 973
8 Irvine Orange 814
9 Manteca San Joaquin 809
10 Fontana San Bernardino 806
Numeric Multi-Family Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Los Angeles Los Angeles 7,061
2 San Diego San Diego 6,179
3 Sacramento Sacramento 3,282
4 Santa Clara Santa Clara 2,700
5 San Jose Santa Clara 1,869
6 San Francisco San Francisco 1,447
7 Oakland Alameda 1,188
8 Chula Vista San Diego 1,150
9 Sunnyvale Santa Clara 1,083
10 Fresno Fresno 1,055
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Percent Total Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Paradise Butte 9.97%
2 Crescent City Del Norte 9.71%
3 Mountain House San Joaquin 7.25%
4 Lathrop San Joaquin 6.98%
5 Buellton Santa Barbara 6.71%
6 Duarte Los Angeles 6.31%
7 Shafter Kern 6.15%
8 Santa Clara Santa Clara 5.12%
9 Wildomar Riverside 4.85%
10 Fowler Fresno 4.17%
Percent Single Family Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Paradise Butte 9.31%
2 Shafter Kern 7.15%
3 Lathrop San Joaquin 7.14%
4 Fowler Fresno 5.35%
5 Mountain House San Joaquin 5.08%
6 Banning Riverside 4.36%
7 Hughson Stanislaus 3.89%
8 San Jacinto Riverside 3.78%
9 Rancho Cordova Sacramento 3.42%
10 Woodlake Tulare 3.37%
Percent Multi-Family Housing Unit Growth
Rank City County Total HU
1 Mountain House San Joaquin 77.82%
2 Wildomar Riverside 73.66%
3 Buellton Santa Barbara 58.65%
4 Rolling Hills Estates Los Angeles 44.91%
5 Menifee Riverside 27.76%
6 Eastvale Riverside 26.77%
7 Crescent Del Norte 21.45%
8 Duarte Los Angeles 20.49%
9 Norco Riverside 16.88%
10 Rancho Mirage Riverside 16.09%
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery SB 1383 Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products Calculator Tool
PROCUREMENT TARGET & PLANNING
STEP 1: Jurisdiction Name and Reporting Year
Jurisdiction Name (City, County, or City and County): Reporting Year:
Huron 2026
STEP 2: Annual Procurement Target
The jurisdiction population equals the number of residents in a jurisdiction, using the most recent annual data reported by the California Department of Finance.
Click here for the jurisdiction population estimates from the California Department of Finance.
Description Data Unit
Jurisdiction Population: 10,287 Residents
Per Capita Procurement Target: 0.08 Tons of organic waste per California resident per year Procurement Target: 823.0 Tons of organic waste
Percent of Procurement Target needed to be
compliant 100% Percentage of revision due to AB 1985 (PRC Section 42652.5) See Read Me tab, row 28 for more information.
Revised Procurement Target: 822.96 Tons of organic waste per California resident per year
PRODUCTS
The conversion factors below, from 14 CCR Section 18993.1(g) of the regulations, convert the procurement target into quantities of recovered organic waste products.
Conversion Factors
1 Ton of Organic Waste in a Procurement Target Shall Constitute:
Recovered Organic Waste Product Quantity Unit
Renewable Gas in the form of Transportation Fuel 21 DGE Electricity from Renewable Gas 242 kWh
Heat from Renewable Gas 22 therms
Electricity from Biomass Conversion 650 kWh
Compost 0.58 tons
Compost 1.45 cubic yards
Mulch 1 ton
MEETING 100% OF THE PROCUREMENT TARGET THROUGH ONE PRODUCT The quantity of each product below reflects how much a jurisdiction would need to procure to meet 100% of their procurement target through just one product.
Recovered Organic Waste Product
Quantity Procured
Annually Quantity Procured Monthly Unit
Renewable Gas in the form of Transportation Fuel 17282.16 1,440.2 DGE Electricity from Renewable Gas 199156.32 16,596.4 kWh
Heat from Renewable Gas 18105.12 1,508.8 therms
Electricity from Biomass Conversion 534924 44,577.0 kWh Compost (tons) 477.3168 39.8 tons
Compost (cubic yards) 1193.292 99.4 cubic yards
Mulch 822.96 68.6 tons
STEP 3: PLANNING FOR PROCUREMENT
Option 1: Plan for Procurement Using Percent of Target Met Recovered Organic Waste Product
Percent of Procurement
Target Met
Quantity Procured
Annually Quantity Procured Monthly Unit
Renewable Gas in the form of Transportation Fuel 0 0.0 DGE Electricity from Renewable Gas 0 0.0 kWh
Heat from Renewable Gas 0 0.0 therms
Electricity from Biomass Conversion 0 0.0 kWh
Compost (tons) 0 0.0 tons
Compost (cubic yards) 0 0.0 cubic yards
Mulch 0 0.0 tons
Total 0.00%
Fulfillment of Procurement Target (Using Option 1)
0.00%
Option 2: Plan for Procurement Using Quantity Procured
Recovered Organic Waste Product
Quantity Procured
Annually Quantity Procured Monthly Unit Percent of Procurement Target Met Renewable Gas in the form of Transportation Fuel 0.0 DGE 0.00% Electricity from Renewable Gas 0.0 kWh 0.00%
Heat from Renewable Gas 0.0 therms 0.00%
Electricity from Biomass Conversion 0.0 kWh 0.00%
Compost (tons) 478.0 39.8 tons 100.14%
Compost (cubic yards) 0.0 cubic yards 0.00%
Mulch 0.0 tons 0.00%
Total 100.14%
Fulfillment of Procurement Target (Using Option 2)
100.14%
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
October 14, 2025
Wording for Agenda:
Approval of the Purchase of 510 Tons of Compost from Mid Valley Disposal of Kerman, CA in the Amount of $16,563.18 as Required Under Senate Bill (SB) 1383 to Meet the City of Exeter’s 2025 Procurement Target.
Submitting Department:
Public Works
Contact Name:
Marie Arroyo, Senior Administrative Assistant
Staff recommend that the City Council approve the purchase of 510 tons of compost from Mid Valley Disposal of Kerman, CA in the amount of $16,563.18 as required under SB 1383 to meet the 2025 procurement target.
Senate Bill (SB) 1383, the Organics Recycling Law, took effect on January 1, 2022, requiring all California cities to reduce organic waste disposal and purchase recovered organic waste products. The City of Exeter is required to comply and based on the formula set by the State of California, the procurement target is based on 0.08 tons of organic waste per jurisdiction population per year.
The law established phased procurement goals—30% by 2023, 65% by the end of 2024, and full 100% compliance by the end of 2025. For the City of Exeter, this equates to an annual purchase requirement of approximately 510 tons of compost ($16,563.18) or 880 tons of mulch ($21,670.00). Based on past experience, community feedback has shown a strong preference for compost over mulch.
SB 1383 further mandates that local agencies provide food recycling services for residents and businesses, conduct inspections, enforce compliance, and support edible food recovery programs. As part of these requirements, cities must “buy back” a portion of the compost For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
__J.R.___
Agenda Item Number: H.5.
Department Recommendation:
Summary/Background:
October 14, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
created from the organics collected within city limits. Exeter intends to utilize the compost for City projects and to offer it free of charge to residents as part of the City’s compliance strategy.
The $16,563.18 cost associated with this action includes procurement of 510 tons of compost, hauler delivery fees and all applicable taxes which will be appropriated from the refuse fund.
In 2024, the City Council approved the purchase of 310 tons of compost in the amount of $10,644.88.
• Mid Valley Disposal Invoice
I move to approve the purchase of 510 tons of compost from Mid Valley Disposal of Kerman, CA in the amount of $16,563.18 as required under Senate Bill (SB) 1383 to meet the City of Exeter’s 2025 procurement target.
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
October 14, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Bill To:
9/23/25
Account Number 73185700
3318054
Invoice Date
Invoice Number
$16,858.25
Account Summary
Current Invoice Activity
Pay This Amount
INVOICE/STATEMENT
"Locally Owned and Operated"
MVD MRF OUTBOUND
RECYCLING & TRANSFER STATION
PO Box 12227 - Fresno, CA 93777
Phone: 559-843-2467
www.midvalleydisposal.com
$16,563.18
EXETER CITY
ATTN: MARIE ARROYO
-------------PLEASE DETACH HERE AND RETURN ABOVE PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT.---------- Date Description Reference Job PO Quantity Unit $: Subtotal EXETER, CA 93221
PO BOX 237
Sept 2025 Procurement
Site/Service Location: 73185700 / EXETER CITY COMPOST / COMPOST-EXETER / EXETER, CA 93221 9/23/25 FREIGHT procurement 25.00 $275.00 $6,875.00
9/23/25 O-COMPOST 3/8 procurement 510.00 $18.00 $9,180.00 9/23/25 MISC procurement tax 1.00 $803.25 $803.25
As Of Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days Total
9/23/25 $16,858.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16,563.18
*3318054*
October 14, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Authorize the Purchase of One (1) Commercial Chemical Sprayer Trailer from California Turf Equipment & Supply, Inc. (Cal Turf) for Vegetation and Weed Management in an Amount Not to
Exceed $14,072.49.
Submitting Department:
Public Works
Contact Name:
Zachary Boudreaux, Public Works Director
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) commercial chemical sprayer trailer from Cal Turf for vegetation and weed management at the City’s water well sites, wastewater treatment plant, parks, and rights-of-way, in an amount not to exceed $14,072.49.
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining City-owned properties, roadways, parks, landscaped areas, and public rights-of-way. Effective weed and vegetation control is essential for maintaining public safety, improving aesthetics, reducing fire hazards, and protecting infrastructure, especially at the City’s water well sites and the wastewater treatment plant, where overgrowth at times can be very substantial.
Currently, staff utilize limited spraying equipment that reduces efficiency and requires frequent refilling, resulting in additional labor and downtime. A commercial-grade chemical sprayer trailer provides a larger tank capacity, higher-capacity pump, hose reel, spray boom, and hand wand, allowing crews to treat larger areas safely and efficiently. Purchasing this equipment will allow staff to perform scheduled herbicide applications in-house, improve response times for weed abatement, and reduce the City’s dependence on outside contractors. Acquisition of this equipment supports the City’s asset management strategy by allowing vegetation control activities to be performed proactively and in-house, contributing to lower long-term For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
__J.R.__
Agenda Item Number: I.7.
Department Recommendation:
Background & Summary:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
operational costs while improving the appearance, safety, and functionality of City-maintained facilities and infrastructure.
Staff solicited written quotes from three vendors for a 500-gallon capacity chemical sprayer trailer meeting the City’s operational requirements. California Turf Equipment & Supply, Inc. (Cal Turf) of Tulare, California, quoted $14,072.49 for a 500-gallon, 7,000-lb capacity single-axle trailer equipped with a Honda-powered Hypro 1538 pump, a 12–20 ft manual-control boom, a 3-port stainless steel manifold with spray gun holster, a hose reel, and an AI-200 gun kit with 200 feet of 3/8-inch hose. Ag Spray Equipment (Ag Spray) of Bakersfield, California, quoted $16,590.50 for a comparable 500-gallon trailer sprayer. Exeter Mercantile Co. (Exeter Mercantile) of Exeter, California, quoted $20,223.45 for a 500-gallon tandem walking beam sprayer with a Honda 120cc engine and steel powder-coated frame. All three units met the City’s minimum specifications; Cal Turf’s quote included the most complete standard equipment package at the lowest total cost, and staff recommends award to Cal Turf as the best value to the City.
The commercial chemical sprayer trailer will provide Public Works staff with the equipment necessary to perform herbicide applications in-house throughout the City’s parks, rights-of-way, streets, alleys, storm drainage facilities, water well sites, wastewater treatment plant, and other City-owned properties. Staff solicited quotes from three vendors and identified Cal Turf as the best value. The trailer will improve vegetation management, reduce labor costs, increase operational efficiency, and reduce the City’s reliance on contracted spraying services.
The total cost for the purchase of the sprayer trailer is $14,072.49. Funding for the purchase is available in the Water and Sewer Funds, with the Water Fund contributing 82% and Sewer Fund contributing 18% of the total cost. Funding is appropriated in the adopted Fiscal Year 2026/27 Capital Improvement Program, Water Fund Account No. 105.461.080.049 and Sewer Fund Account No. 107.441.080.049.
No prior Council actions associated with this action.
• Quotes from Cal Turf, Ag Spray, and Exeter Mercantile I move to authorize the purchase of one (1) commercial chemical sprayer trailer from Cal Turf for vegetation and weed management at the City’s water wells, wastewater treatment plant, parks, and rights-of-way, in an amount not to exceed $14,072.49.
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Authorize the City Administrator (or Designee) to Execute a Renewed Proof of Designation (POD) with Community Services Employment Training (CSET) for Continued Electronic Waste Collection Services in the City of Exeter.
Submitting Department:
Public Works
Contact Name:
Zachary Boudreaux, Director of Public Works
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Administrator (or Designee) to execute a renewed Proof of Designation (POD) with CSET, designating CSET as the City's approved collector of covered electronic waste, in advance of the current designation's expiration on January 1, 2027.
A Proof of Designation (POD) is an official document issued by a California local government under the state's Covered Electronic Waste (CEW) Recycling Program, which designates an approved collector authorized to collect electronic waste on the jurisdiction's behalf.
The City's current POD designates CSET as its approved e-waste collector, providing a permanent drop-off site at the Exeter Public Works Yard and supporting collection at City special events, at no cost to the City.
The current designation is set to expire on January 1, 2027, and CSET has requested that the City renew the designation ahead of that date to avoid any lapse in the City's designated collection services and to keep the City in compliance with state e-waste diversion requirements. Staff has reviewed the current POD and confirmed there are no proposed changes to the designated collection activities, service location, or geographic area of service; For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☒Consent Calendar
☐Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
_J.R.____
Agenda Item Number: I.8.
Department Recommendation:
Summary:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
the renewal would continue the existing arrangement with CSET for an additional term. It is proposed to the designation extended to January 1, 2031.
Under California's Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 and its implementing regulations (14 CCR Division 7, Chapter 7.1, Article 20), local governments may designate approved collectors to receive covered electronic waste (CEW), such as televisions and computer monitors, on their behalf. A POD identifies the designated collector, the geographic area served, the type of collection activity performed, and the effective dates of the designation, and must be submitted to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the designation to take effect.
The City's current POD (CEWID #102584) designates CSET as the City's approved e-waste collector, effective December 31, 2023 through January 1, 2027. Under the designation, CSET maintains a permanent drop-off site at the Exeter Public Works Yard, 350 W. Firebaugh Ave., Exeter, and also supports electronic waste collection during City special events and cleanups.
CSET's services are provided at no cost to the City; approved collectors are compensated through the statewide Covered Electronic Waste Recycling Fee paid by consumers at the point of sale, not through City funds.
There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this action. CSET provides electronic waste collection services to the City at no cost; and no City funds are required for renewal of the POD.
None identified.
• Current City of Exeter Proof of Designation (POD) with CSET (CEWID #102584), effective December 31, 2023, through January 1, 2027
I move to authorize the City Administrator (or Designee) to execute a renewed Proof of Designation (POD) with Community Services Employment Training (CSET) through January 1, 2030, for continued Electronic Water Collection services in the City of Exeter.
Background:
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Item Staff Report
Meeting Date:
September 22, 2026
Wording for Agenda:
Authorize a Sole-Source Purchase from Telstar Instruments (Telstar) to Furnish, Install, Configure, and Commission Two (2) Mission SCADA Pressure Monitoring Stations for the City’s Water-Distribution System in an Amount Not to Exceed
$27,072.00.
Submitting Department:
Public Works
Contact Name:
Zachary Boudreaux, Public Works Director
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize a sole-source purchase from Telstar to furnish, install, configure, and commission two (2) Mission SCADA monitoring units and associated pressure transmitters, one serving the west side of town and one serving the east side of town, in an amount not to exceed $27,072.00.
Reliable pressure monitoring is essential to the operation and maintenance of the City’s waterdistribution system. Distribution-system pressures can vary based on water demand, pump operation, storage-tank levels, valve configurations, system improvements, line breaks, and other operational conditions. Without adequate remote monitoring coverage, staff must rely on field inspections, manual pressure readings, and calls from residents to evaluate conditions in affected service areas.
The proposed project will establish two strategically positioned permanent pressure-monitoring locations: one on the west side of town and one on the east side of town. Each location will be equipped with a pressure transmitter that converts field pressure readings into an electronic signal for transmission to the Mission SCADA unit, which will collect and transmit the data for well operations, display and storage within the City’s existing SCADA system. Upon completion, For action by:
☒City Council
Regular Session:
☐Consent Calendar
☒Regular Item
☐Public Hearing
Review:
City Administrator
(Initials Required)
__J.R.___
Agenda Item Number: J.1.
Department Recommendation:
Background & Summary:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
authorized staff will be able to remotely review current pressure conditions at both locations, analyze historical pressure trends, and receive alarm notifications for low-pressure, highpressure, communication-loss, or other configured operating conditions, providing an additional operational tool for identifying possible system issues before they become more significant service interruptions or customer-service concerns. The pressure monitoring units add to the SCADA system components and well equipment that the City has in place at well sites to more effectively manage system pressures.
Telstar will provide the equipment, field installation, programming, configuration, testing, and commissioning services necessary to place both monitoring stations into operation. Telstar previously installed the City’s existing Mission SCADA system and continues to support it, and is intimately familiar with its configuration, programming, and equipment. Telstar is the only vendor with the specialized knowledge and system access needed to integrate these new monitoring stations without disrupting the City’s existing SCADA operations; engaging a different vendor would require that vendor to first evaluate and become familiar with the City’s SCADA infrastructure, increasing project cost, extending the implementation schedule, and introducing unnecessary risk to a system critical to water system operations. Based on Telstar’s prior installation of and familiarity with the City’s SCADA system, staff has determined that Telstar is the sole vendor qualified to complete this work and recommends that the City Council authorize this purchase as a sole-source procurement in the City’s best interest.
The proposed project will install two remote pressure-monitoring stations at strategic locations within the City’s water-distribution system. Each station will include a Mission SCADA remote monitoring unit, pressure transmitter, required field wiring, electrical components, communications equipment, mounting hardware, and integration with the City’s existing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The west-side and east-side monitoring stations will provide continuous pressure data to operations staff, allowing for remote observation of system conditions, historical trending, and alarm notification when pressure readings exceed or are too low to establish operating parameters.
The additional monitoring and operational capability will improve staff’s ability to identify abnormal pressure conditions, evaluate distribution-system performance, respond to customer concerns, and support operational decision-making during both routine and emergency conditions.
Funding for this project, in an amount not to exceed $27,072.00, is available in the Water Fund, SCADA Meter System Water/Wastewater Capital Project in the adopted Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2026/27.Account No. 105.461.080.017.
On May 27, 2025, the City Council approved an award of contract to Telstar for acquisition of equipment and implementation of a SCADA system.
Fiscal Impact:
Prior City Council Actions:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
• Quote from Telstar
• Sole Source Memo
I move to authorize a sole-source purchase from Telstar Instruments to Furnish, Install, Configure, and Commission two (2) Mission SCADA Pressure Monitoring Stations for the City’s Water-Distribution System in an amount not to exceed $27,072.00.
Attachments:
Recommended motion to be made by the City Council:
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Office of the Director of Public Works
Zachary Boudreaux
350 W. Firebaugh – PO Box 237, Exeter, CA 93221
Ph. #559-592-3318
[email protected]
Re: Sole Source Memorandum for Telstar Instruments – Mission SCADA Pressure Monitoring Stations
Telstar Instruments (Telstar) has provided a quote, included with the staff report, to furnish, install, configure, and commission two (2) Mission SCADA pressure monitoring stations for the City’s water-distribution system, in an amount not to exceed $27,072.00. It is the opinion of Staff that, for the reasons below, this project should be awarded to Telstar on a sole-source basis.
1. The City’s water-distribution system currently operates on a Mission SCADA platform that Telstar installed and continues to support. Telstar has unique, in-depth knowledge of the system’s configuration, programming, and equipment, and is the only vendor with the system access needed to integrate the two new pressure monitoring stations without disrupting the City’s existing SCADA operations.
2. Telstar Instruments is in Hanford, CA, making them by far the closest located service provider for SCADA technology. Proximity to our system has and will reduce the response time for service. The next nearest provider is in the Bay Area and frequently cannot respond to service calls within several days. This response time is unacceptable when keeping water and sewer systems operating.
3. Engaging a different vendor for this project would require that vendor to first evaluate and become familiar with the City’s SCADA infrastructure before any work could begin, increasing project cost, extending the implementation schedule, and introducing unnecessary risk to a system that is critical to the operation of the City’s water system.
4. The proposed monitoring stations will give operations staff continuous, remote visibility into pressure conditions on the west and east sides of town, including historical trending and alarm notification for high-pressure, low-pressure, and communication-loss conditions, allowing staff to identify and respond to potential system issues before they become significant service interruptions.
5. Currently, Staff has no active way of monitoring activity in our systems without physically being at each facility individually. Our Operations Manager installed a pressure gauge at his private residence to keep some level of monitoring on the water system pressure.
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet
Office of the Director of Public Works
Zachary Boudreaux
350 W. Firebaugh – PO Box 237, Exeter, CA 93221
Ph. #559-592-3318
[email protected]
6. For the above reasons, many nearby Cities also use Telstar Instruments with similar SCADA systems including Lindsay, Farmersville, Tulare, Visalia, Porterville, Firebaugh, Lemoore, Hanford, and Lindsay Strathmore Irrigation District.
Given the above listed items, Staff recommends that the City Council authorize a sole-source purchase from Telstar to furnish, install, configure, and commission two (2) Mission SCADA pressure monitoring stations, in an amount not to exceed $27,072.00.
Respectfully,
Zachary Boudreaux
Director, Public Works
September 22, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Exeter City Council Agenda Packet