SPECIAL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM #4
MEETING DATE November 19, 2024
PREPARED FOR Mayor and Town Council
PREPARED BY Rico Tabaranza, Chief of Police
SUBJECT Approve Revised Responses to the 2023-2024 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Report entitled "With Power Comes Responsibility Youth Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk”
RECOMMENDATION
Approve revised responses to the Marin County Civil Grand Jury Report entitled "With Power Comes Responsibility Youth Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk“
BACKGROUND
In California, civil grand juries are authorized to “investigate and report upon the operations, accounts, and records of the officers, departments, functions, and the method or system of performing the duties of any such city or joint powers agency and make such recommendations as it may deem proper and fit” (Cal. Penal Code section 925a). Within 90 days after the grand jury submits a report regarding the operations of any public agency, the “governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body...” (Cal. Penal Code section 933(c)).
Published on April 26, 2024, the Civil Grand Jury Report titled "With Power Comes Responsibility Youth Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk” conducted an investigation to determine the extent of the problem when children under age 16 operate e-bikes in Marin, and to explore possible solutions.
The Town Council previously approved responses to this report at their July 17, 2024 meeting.
DISCUSSION
Since our response to this report, the Civil Grand Jury has requested a revised response to Recommendation 2 and 3 (R2 and R3), finding that "Fairfax did not fully comply with all requirements for Recommendations R2 and R3 . Per Penal Code section 933.05(b)(2), your response of "requires further analysis", must include a timeframe, especially since AB 1778 has now been signed into law. ”
The Town’s revised response is included in the attachment.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
Revised Response to Grand Jury Report
RESPONSE FORM: 2023-2024 Marin Civil Grand Jury Report
Report Title: With Power Comes Responsibility Youths Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk
Respondent/Agency Name: Fairfax Town Council and Fairfax Police Chief Submitter Name: Title:
FINDINGS
▪ Agree with the findings numbered: F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6 ▪ Disagree partially with the findings numbered: N/A
▪ Disagree wholly with the findings numbered: N/A
RECOMMENDATIONS
▪ Recommendations numbered N/A have been implemented.
▪ Recommendations numbered N/A have not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
▪ Recommendations numbered R2, R3 require further analysis. ▪ Recommendations numbered R1, R4 will not be implemented because they are not warranted or are not reasonable.
Dated: November 19, 2024 Signed: _______________________________ Originally Submitted: July 17, 2024 Heather Abrams, Town Manager ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christine Foster, Deputy Town Clerk
Number of pages attached: 2
FINDINGS
F1. The increasing number of e-bike accidents involving youths under the age of 16 presents a public health and safety danger in Marin.
Agree.
F2. The operation of class 2 e-bikes by operators under the age of 16 poses a significant risk to the safety of e-bike operators, other bike riders, passengers, and pedestrians on sidewalks, streets, multi-use paths, and trails in Marin.
Agree.
F3. The emerging and increasing safety issues related to class 2 e-bike use by operators under the age of 16 has not been addressed by Marin County or the municipalities in a uniform manner.
Agree.
F4. For all practical purposes, the state of California has abdicated its responsibility to regulate the use of class 2 e-bikes, leaving it up to the County of Marin and the Marin municipalities to create their own regulations.
Agree.
F5. The funding to continue the e-bike specific safety and training program (E-bike Smart Marin) provided by the Marin County Bicycle Coalition is not sustainable without new sources of funding.
Agree.
F6. Marin County public schools are not currently able to implement additional bicycle safety training programs for students, beyond what has been offered by Safe Routes to Schools for many years.
Agree.
RESPONSES
R1. By December 31, 2024, the Board of Supervisors, and each municipality in Marin should take all steps necessary to adopt an ordinance with regard to class 2 e-bikes with, at minimum, the following provisions:
(a) Only people aged 16 or older may operate class 2 e-bikes. (b) Operators of class 2 e-bikes must wear helmets.
(c) All passengers on class 2 e-bikes must wear helmets.
Recommendation number R1 will not be implemented because it is not warranted.
As to the issue surrounding age, it is difficult for law enforcement to surmise the age of the operator in mere passing; making enforcement stops based solely to verify the operator's age a concern for law enforcement.
The only difference between a Class 1 and Class 2 E-bike is that a Class 2 E-bike has a throttle control. Both have motors that cannot emit power in excess of 750 watts, enabling the E-bike to travel up to 20 mph. Based on the Marin County Health and Human Services Bicycle Safety Dashboard, there is no evidence that the mere presence of a throttle control, Class 2, is causing any more accidents than pedal assist, Class 1. We see no reason to differentiate the laws between Class 1 and Class 2 E-bikes with regard to age.
California law adequately codifies the usage of helmets for E-bikes based on age and class of Ebike. (21212 CVC-All operators and passengers under 18 years of age shall wear a helmet when riding an E-bike).
R2. By December 31, 2024, the County of Marin and each municipality in Marin should take all steps necessary to establish a joint task force or committee to investigate and consider coordination among the county and municipalities about adopting a county-wide uniform set of regulations regarding e-bike use within the County of Marin.
The Town of Fairfax agrees with this recommendation, furthermore, the Fairfax Police participates in the Marin County Police Chiefs Association which consults with assigned committee members who discuss best practices regarding education and enforcement of e-bike safety. If the County of Marin establishes its own task force or committee which could provide consistency in enforcement and education policies throughout the County and its municipalities, the Town of Fairfax is available to participate in that, as well.
R3. Any task force or committee as described in Recommendation 2, above, should consider inviting representatives from Marin County schools, law enforcement, public health officials, and bicycle advocates to provide their input.
This recommendation requires further analysis, research and coordination among jurisdictions. The Town of Fairfax agrees with this recommendation and is available to participate in a regional task force or committee that involves all relevant partners that have a stake in the process.
R4. By December 31, 2024, the Board of Supervisors should explore options for additional funding for student and public education in Marin County about e-bike safety.
Recommendation number R4 is not applicable to this jurisdiction and should be commented on only by the Board of Supervisors.