Cities Index.
Presentation-_Meadow-Way-Bridge-7-16-25_Eminent-Domain

Fairfax City Council
July 16, 2025

Document
Presentation-_Meadow-Way-Bridge-7-16-25_Eminent-Domain
Meeting
July 16, 2025
Body
Fairfax City Council
Original file
6.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on storage.googleapis.com. That file is the official record.

Meadow Way Bridge -
Resolution of
Necessity Hearing
Town Council Meeting July 16, 2025
Overview
▪ Project highlights
▪ Properties being acquired
▪ Hearing and findings
▪ Recommendation
Project Highlights
• Full bridge replacement.
• 1950s Wooden bridge.
• Only access way for
residents.
• Structurally deficient – poor
condition.
• Fire evacuation risks.
• Largely grant funded.

Properties Town needs to Acquire
▪ Federal
Government
requirement for
funding.
▪ 2 properties –
roadway.
▪ Risk needing to
pay back $2 million
if property cannot
be acquired.

Eminent Domain - Finding One
Public interest and necessity
require project.
▪Only egress and ingress for
Meadow Way.
▪Bridge is structurally
deficient.
▪End of useful life – full
replacement required.

Eminent Domain - Finding Two
Greatest public good and least private injury.
▪No other feasible location to cross the creek.
▪Impacts due to construction in the manner proposed are minimized.
▪Efforts will be made to pursue project completion as
quickly as possible once work has started.

Eminent Domain - Finding Three
Real property to be acquired is necessary for the project. ▪Objectives include:
▪Improve traffic operations.
▪Improve overall safety.
▪Replace structurally deficient bridge.
▪Hollister and Cascade property interests are needed for Meadow Way because only access way for residents.

Eminent Domain - Finding Four
Offers Just Compensation
▪Years of research to determine ownership and history
of properties.
▪No proven ownership of the land.
▪Skip trace found distant relatives.
▪Last resort.

Staff Recommendations
▪ Adopt findings and two Resolutions of
Necessity
▪ The public interest and necessity require
the proposed project;
▪ The proposed project is planned or
located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good
and the least private injury;
▪ The real property to be acquired is
necessary for the project; and
▪ The offer of just compensation was
made, or the offer has not been made
because the owner cannot be located
with reasonable diligence.
▪ Needs 4 votes to pass (2/3 majority)
Questions &
Comments

← All documents from this meeting