Cities Index.
FW_ Rancho Solano LLMD

Fairfield City Council
June 6, 2023

Document
FW_ Rancho Solano LLMD
Meeting
June 6, 2023
Body
Fairfield City Council
Pages
2
Original file
2 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on eservices.fairfield.ca.gov. That file is the official record.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

From:Vaccaro, Rick
To:Beavers, Esther
Subject:FW: Rancho Solano LLMD
Date:Monday, June 5, 2023 9:42:13 AM

From: Vaccaro, Rick
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 7:45 AM
To: Rob Tavenier
Subject: RE: Rancho Solano LLMD

Hi Rob,

I will call you this afternoon.

RickVaccaro

From: Rob Tavenier
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 10:26 PM
To: Bertani, Pam ; Moy, Catherine ; Vaccaro,
Rick
Subject: Fwd: Rancho Solano LLMD



So no response to my terse but accurate email enclosed below?

Cat, you seem to address wrongs, how is this not a wrong?

Pat, you messed up, own up to it and become a believable representative of your votes.

Please have someone call me to explain how you properly (mis) represented residents not in your district.

Rick, did you have an opportunity to discuss this with Pat before her inaccurate comments?

Rob Tavenier,
925-595-6002

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Rob Tavenier
Date: May 19, 2023 at 10:54:59 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rancho Solano LLMD
I am a long time resident of Rancho Solano and would like to know what action you have or will be taking to undo the gross negligence you performed at the City Council meeting regarding the no action vote you promoted on my LLMD.

Your actions have negatively impacted the vote for the LLMD.

Why would you speak with such authority on here-say regarding an item that is not in your district? Whom did you speak to?
It was publicly stated by a City official (Public Works Director?) at a City sponsored meeting that the City was going to vote ‘yes’ to preserve the quality of life for residents.

I expect that this error will be corrected, even if the City has to pay for a re-vote for the LLMD at their (my tax/LLMD dollars) expense?
Why was the Engineers report altered after the date it was signed? I have emails from Civicmic stating an error would be corrected in March when the final report was signed in February?
Thanks,
Rob Tavenier
Sent from my iPad

← All documents from this meeting