Cities Index.
Matt Garcia Community Park Master Plan.pdf

Fairfield City Council
March 4, 2025

Document
Matt Garcia Community Park Master Plan.pdf
Meeting
March 4, 2025
Body
Fairfield City Council
Pages
18
Original file
182.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-fairfield.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Table 3: Matt Garcia Community Park Trip Generation Estimates Use Size ITE
Code Daily
Weekday Saturday
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Midday
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Recreation
Center
40,000
SF 495 1,153 50 26 76 65 73 138 23 20 43
Adventure
Playground

1.03 Acres 411 89 0 0 0 13 10 23 15 12 27
Soccer Fields1 6 fields Custom 428 11 2 13 78 41 119 150 163 313 Tennis Courts2 8
courts Custom 243 10 10 20 24 24 48 32 32 64
Pickleball
Courts3
4 courts
Custom 121 8 8 16 16 16 32 16 16 32
All Wheels
Track

0.53 Acres 411 89 0 0 0 12 11 23 15 12 27
Outdoor
Amphitheater

2.23 Acres 411 90 0 0 0 13 10 23 15 12 27
Splash Pad 0.46
Acres 411 89 0 0 0 12 11 23 15 11 26
Dog Park 1.01
Acres 411 89 0 0 0 12 11 23 15 12 27
Total 2,391 79 46 125 245 207 452 296 290 586
Notes:

1. Daily/PM/SAT rates use ITE Land Use Code 488; AM: One team (11 players) practice, 20% outbound trips – https://westernite.org/datacollectionfund/2011/UH%20Final%20Report%202011.pdf

2. Daily: ITE Land Use Code 490; AM: 2 courts doubles, 1 court singles; PM: 4 courts doubles, 4 courts singles; SAT:
8 courts doubles; 50% inbound/outbound (ITE Land Use 490/LifeTime Beaverton); everyone analyzed as a separate trip -
https://apps2.beavertonoregon.gov/DevelopmentProjects/ApplicantMaterials/Applicant%20PC%20Testimony% 20(5-28-19)%20DEA%20TIA%20Addendum%205%20-%20Change%20of%20Use.pdf

3. Daily: ITE Land Use Code 490; AM: 2 courts doubles, 1 court singles: PM: 4 courts doubles; SAT: 4 courts doubles; 50% inbound/outbound (ITE Land Use 490/LifeTime Beaverton); everyone analyzed as a separate trip - https://apps2.beavertonoregon.gov/DevelopmentProjects/ApplicantMaterials/Applicant%20PC%20Testimony% 20(5-28-19)%20DEA%20TIA%20Addendum%205%20-%20Change%20of%20Use.pdf Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and Fehr & Peers, June 2023.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
127
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 8 of 24 ends

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Project trip distribution refers to the directions of approach and departure that vehicles would take to access and leave the site. Estimates of regional Project trip distribution were developed based on existing travel patterns in the area from Streetlight Data. The resulting trip distribution percentages for weekday morning peak hour, weekday evening peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour are shown on Figure 2.

The Project trip generation estimates, in combination with the expected trip distribution patterns, were used to assign vehicle trips to the local roadway network, as shown on Figure 3. 128 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Union Creek
Union Creek
aV dn ne d R
McCrory Rd
d Ret a G N
aV dn ne d R
Canon Rd
Lake Trail
Cannon
2 3
4 1
70%50%
30%50%
WC23-3987_2_TripDistro
Project Trip Distribution
Figure 2
Project Site Study Intersection # Weekday AM/PM
Saturday
X%
Y%
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
129
Union Creek
Un oi n Creek
Vanden Rd
McCrory Rd
N Gate Rd
Vanden Rd
Canon Rd
Lake Trail
Cannon
2 4
3 1
WC23-3987_X_Volumes
AM (PM) [Saturday] Signalized Intersection Project Site # Study Intersection Peak Hour Trac Volumes
XX (YY) [ZZ] STOP Stop Sign

2. Vanden Rd/Matt Garcia S Access Pt/Canon Rd

1. Vanden Rd/Matt Garcia N Access Pt Vanden Rd
Matt Garcia N Access Pt
Matt Garcia N Access Pt Canon Rd Vanden Rd

3. Matt Garcia Internal Dwy/S Access Pt
Matt Garcia Internal Dwy Matt Garcia S Access Pt
Matt Garcia Internal Dwy
STOP
STOP
POTS
STOP
STOP
55 (172) [207]
23 (102) [142]
14 (62) [87] 17 (51) [62] 10 (43) [61]
23 (102) [142]
10 (43) [61] 8 (22) [27] 17 (51) [62]
1 (3) [5]
31 (138) [193]
1 (3) [5]
2 (10) [14]
1 (3) [5] 1 (3) [5] 4 (16) [22]
7 (22) [27]
22 (67) [81]
43 (134) [161]

A AF FC
C F FC
A

CF CF CA ACF
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 3
55 (172)
24 (105)

4. Vanden Rd/New Canon Rd/Canon Rd
New Canon Road Canon Road Vanden Rd
C
C
130 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 11 of 24 ends

Cumulative with Project
Traffic Conditions
This section presents the evaluation of intersection level of service under Cumulative with Project conditions.

Cumulative Traffic Volumes and Lane Configuration
Assumptions
This section describes the cumulative traffic volumes and lane configurations utilized in the study.

Cumulative Traffic Volumes
Cumulative traffic volumes were established based on forecasts prepared in the FTSSP EIR.

Volumes and lane configurations were adjusted to account for the change in development plans since the EIR was certified. Based on discussions with City staff and the project team, the cumulative traffic volumes do not incorporate the industrial development anticipated in the FTSSP EIR Planning Area 6 as the development plans for the area are speculative.

The Project traffic volumes in Figure 3 were added to cumulative traffic volumes to estimate the Cumulative with Project traffic volumes, presented on Figure 4.

Cumulative Lane Configuration Assumptions
The following lane configurations were assumed at the Project access points:

Vanden Road/Matt Garcia North Access Point
• Northbound: two thru lanes
• Southbound: one thru lane, one shared thru-right turn lane • Eastbound: one dedicated right turn lane
Vanden Road/Canon Road/Matt Garcia South Access Point
• Northbound: one dedicated left turn lane, two thru lanes • Southbound: two thru lanes, one dedicated right turn lane • Eastbound: one dedicated left turn pocket, one shared thru-right turn lane Matt Garcia Internal South Driveway
• Northbound: one shared left-thru-right turn lane
• Southbound: one shared left-thru-right turn lane
• Eastbound: one shared left-thru-right turn lane
• Westbound: one dedicated left turn pocket (100 feet), one shared thru-right turn lane CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
131
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 12 of 24 ends

The analysis assumed the latest Vanden Road improvements at the Vanden Road/New Canon Road/Canon Road intersection, which includes the Canon Road overcrossing and the Vanden Road widening and re-alignment.

Cumulative with Project Conditions Analysis Results
Intersection Operations
FTSSP EIR Consistency
Consistent with the FTSSP EIR, the Vanden Road/New Canon Road/Canon Road intersection was analyzed for the morning and evening weekday peak hours. The LOS was compared to the FTSSP EIR results to identify if the modified Project would worsen delay beyond what was identified in the FTSSP EIR. The intersection operations for this intersection for Cumulative with Project conditions are summarized in Table 4. Detailed calculation sheets are provided in Appendix A.

Table 4: Cumulative with Project Level of Service Summary Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
FTTSP 2030 with
Project
Cumulative with
Project
Delay3 LOS Delay LOS
Vanden Road/New Canon
Road/Canon Road (FTSSP EIR
Intersection)
Signal AM
PM

35.2 D 42.0 D

58.54 E 30.5 C
Notes:

1. Signal = Signalized

2. AM= Weekday morning peak hour, PM = Weekday evening peak hour

3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized intersections. Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.

4. Although the weekday PM peak hour delay and LOS is above the City’s LOS standard, the TSSP acknowledges this substantial adverse effect and does not have an improvement measure identified.

Under the FTSSP EIR, the Vanden Road/New Canon Road/Canon Road intersection was anticipated to operate at LOS D and E during the morning and evening peak hours, respectively.

However, with the modified Project description and revised background assumptions, the Vanden Road/New Canon Road/Canon Road intersection is expected to operate at LOS D during the morning peak hour and LOS D during the evening peak hour. Therefore, the Project’s modified description is not anticipated to worsen LOS conditions beyond what was concluded in the FTSSP EIR.
132 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 13 of 24 ends

Matt Garcia Park Project Access Point
The intersection operations for the Cumulative with Project conditions at the Project access points are summarized in Table 5. Detailed calculation sheets are provided in Appendix A.

Table 5: Cumulative with Project Level of Service Summary Intersection Control1 Peak Hour2
Cumulative with Project
Delay3 LOS
1 Vanden Road/Matt Garcia
North Access Point SSSC
AM
PM
SAT

0.1 (12.1) A (B)

0.2 (15.1) A (C)

0.4 (13.3) A (B)
2 Vanden Road/Canon
Road/Matt Garcia South
Access Point
Signal
AM
PM
SAT

3.9 A

10.4 B

13.2 B
3 Matt Garcia Internal South
Driveway AWSC
AM
PM
SAT

7.4 A

8.5 A

9.1 A
Notes:

1. Existing intersection traffic control type: SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled, Signal = Signalized, AWSC = AllWay Stop Controlled

2. AM= Weekday morning peak hour, PM = Weekday evening peak hour, SAT = Saturday midday peak hour

3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Side-Street stop-controlled delay presented as Whole Intersection Average Delay (Worst Movement Delay). Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.

Source: Fehr & Peers, June 2023.

The LOS analysis was completed assuming an all-way stop control at the Internal South Driveway (intersection 3). The roadway configurations would include two lanes exiting and entering the site to accommodate potential queues at the Internal South Driveway. If there is not sufficient right of way to accommodate four lanes between the Vanden Road/Matt Garcia South Access Point and Internal South Driveway intersections, a side-street stop control at the Internal South Driveway should be considered, with free movements for the east-west direction. The roadway configuration between Vanden Road and the internal park circulator would include two lanes exiting and one lane entering the site with median.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
133
Union Creek
Un oi n Creek
Vanden Rd
McCrory Rd
N Gate Rd
Vanden Rd
Canon Rd
Lake Trail
Cannon
2 4
3 1
WC23-3987_X_Volumes
AM (PM) [Saturday] Signalized Intersection Project Site # Study Intersection Peak Hour Trac Volumes
XX (YY) [ZZ] STOP Stop Sign

2. Vanden Rd/Matt Garcia S Access Pt/Canon Rd

1. Vanden Rd/Matt Garcia N Access Pt Vanden Rd
Matt Garcia N Access Pt
Matt Garcia N Access Pt Canon Rd Vanden Rd

3. Matt Garcia Internal Dwy/S Access Pt
Matt Garcia Internal Dwy Matt Garcia S Access Pt
Matt Garcia Internal Dwy
STOP
STOP
POTS
STOP
STOP
55 (172) [207]
23 (102) [142]
14 (62) [87] 17 (51) [62] 10 (43) [61]
23 (102) [142]
10 (43) [61] 8 (22) [27] 17 (51) [62]
1 (3) [5]
31 (138) [193]
1 (3) [5]
2 (10) [14]
1 (3) [5] 1 (3) [5] 4 (16) [22]
7 (22) [27]
22 (67) [81]
43 (134) [161]

A AF FC
C F FC
A

CF CF CA ACF
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 3
55 (172)
24 (105)

4. Vanden Rd/New Canon Rd/Canon Rd
New Canon Road Canon Road Vanden Rd
C
C
134 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 15 of 24 ends

Vehicle Queues
In addition to the LOS and delay calculations, Fehr & Peers also calculated the estimated 95th percentile queue lengths at the Project access point to estimate the turn storage lengths. The Project’s access points were evaluated for the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday morning scenarios, as presented in Table 6. As shown, under Cumulative with Project conditions, the 95th percentile queue is not expected to exceed the proposed turn pocket lengths.

Table 6: Cumulative with Project Conditions 95th Percentile Turn Pocket Queue Summary
Intersection Control Approach Storage
Length (ft)1
Cumulative with Project

AM PM SAT
1 Vanden Road/Matt
Garcia North Access
Point
SSSC EBR 425 25 50 75
2 Vanden Road/Canon
Road/Matt Garcia South
Access Point
Signal
EBL 200 50 125 150
NBL 300 75 200 200
3 Matt Garcia Internal
South Driveway AWSC WBTR 200 75 100 100
Notes:

1. An additional 60 to 90 feet of storage is typically provided in the taper area outside of the through lane, which is not reflected in the storage length above.

2. Storage length is based on Matt Garcia Community Park Site Plan (Figure 1) Source: Fehr & Peers, June 2023.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
135
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 16 of 24 ends

Site Access Review
Site access and internal circulation were reviewed for vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and emergency vehicles entering and exiting the Project. Recommendations are provided to improve wayfinding, reduce driver confusion, and denote efficient linkages between the Project and existing transportation network. It is recommended that the conceptual site plan continue to be evaluated as the site’s design plans progress. When available, the final site improvement plans should also be reviewed by City of Fairfield staff to identify and address additional transportation issues that cannot be identified based on a review of the current site plan before the Project is built. A summary of the site plan review and comments are included as Figure 5.

Vehicle Access and Circulation
The Project can be accessed via two access points along Vanden Road. The northern access point is approximately 28 feet in width and side street stop controlled with right in, right out access. The southern access point is signalized and is proposed to be approximately 36 feet in width, which can accommodate up to three lanes of travel (12 foot lanes).

The following improvements are recommended to enhance vehicular access and circulation throughout the project site:
• Mark direction of travel at the ingress and egress points • Consider allocating pick-up and drop-off locations at the northern parallel parking spaces near the soccer fields
• Consider a southbound right turn pocket at the Matt Garcia North Access Point • Maintain landscaping at Project access point, internal intersections, and crosswalks to reduce sight distance conflicts. Shrubs should not be higher than approximately 30 inches and tree canopies should be approximately six feet from the ground • Vanden Road and Matt Garcia South Access Point intersection improvements ◦ Vanden Road: Include a southbound right turn pocket (min 100 feet) and northbound left turn pocket (min 200 feet) at the Matt Garcia Southern Access Point intersection ◦ Matt Garcia Southern Access Point Roadway:
▪ As described in the intersection operations analysis section above, include two lanes exiting the site (one dedicated left turn pocket and one shared thru-right lane) and two lanes entering the site (one dedicated left turn pocket (100 feet) and one shared thru-right)
136 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 17 of 24 ends

▪ Install a raised median along the west leg to the Matt Garcia Internal South Driveway
The vehicular access and circulation recommendations are based on an all way stop controlled intersection at the Matt Garcia Internal South Driveway. If there is insufficient right of way to accommodate the four lanes recommended between the Vanden Road/Matt Garcia Southern Access Point and Internal Southern Access Point intersections, a side-street stop control at the Internal Southern Access Point intersection should be considered. The east-west legs would operate as free movements, while the north-south circulator road would include a stop control.

The east leg of the intersection could include one lane for exiting the site, and two lanes (one left turn pocket, one shared thru-right) for entering the site with no median.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Access and Circulation
Existing sidewalk and Class II bike lanes are present along Vanden Road, but terminate south of the project site fronting the One Lake residences near Lake Trail. The Solano Transportation Authority’s Solano County Active Transportation Plan (2020) proposes Class II buffered bike lanes along Vanden Road and the Project frontage. The Project site plans show sidewalk along part of the project frontage, on the west side to Vanden Road. The following improvements are recommended to provide a continuous pedestrian and bicycle network to and from the park:
• Continue and fill in sidewalk gap along the west side of Vanden Road from the Vanden Road/Canon Road/Matt Garcia South Access Point to the Vanden Road/Matt Garcia North Access Point to continue 10-foot minimum sidewalk with continuous 5-foot buffer • Stripe high-visibility crosswalks on the western leg at the Project Access point intersections
• Stripe Class II buffered bike lanes along both sides of Vanden Road, consistent with the proposed bicycle network from the Solano County Active Transportation Plan Walkways and crosswalks are provided within the site, connecting the surface lots and various uses.

Recommendations to improve circulation, wayfinding, pedestrian and bicycle visibility, and encourage pedestrian and bicyclists travel modes are provided below:
• Stripe high-visibility crossings by using patterns or raised crossings • Add R1-5a “YIELD HERE TO PEDESTRIANS” or W15-1 signage throughout the park to keep vehicular speeds down
• Provide short-term and long-term bicycle parking and signage As the Project site plan continues to evolve, we recommend continued evaluation as designs progress.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
137
Caroline Vedder, PE | City of Fairfield
January 18, 2024

Page 18 of 24 ends

Emergency Vehicle Access
Several factors determine whether a project has enough access for emergency vehicles, including:

1. Number of access points (both public and emergency access only)

2. Width of access points

3. Width of internal roadways
The Project access points described in the Vehicular Site Access and Circulation section above would serve as access points for emergency vehicles. Based on a review of an emergency vehicle turning assessment included as Figures 6A – 6D, a 40-foot Fire Truck (UCFD 107’ Aerial Ladder Pierce Arrow) can be accommodated at the Project access points along Vanden Road but may require traversing the opposing travel lane when turning within internal roadways. The corner radius along the west leg of the Internal South Driveway should be revisited to ensure the southbound right and eastbound right movements can be made without mounting the internal sidewalk.

A WB 40 semi-truck was also evaluated as it may be used for events at the amphitheater. We recommend trucks of this size to only use the Vanden Road/Canon Road/Matt Garcia South Access Point for ingress and egress, along with the Internal South Intersection for loading purposes, as shown in Figure 6E.

Additional design considerations for the internal roundabout should be considered. Using a design speed of 5 mph, the roundabout must be designed with a truck apron around the center island to provide room for emergency vehicles and semi-trucks to turn. The ingress and egress legs of the roundabout should also be redesigned to accommodate the wide turning angles.

This concludes our assessment for the Matt Garcia Great Park. For questions or comments, please contact Sarah Chan at (925) 930-7100.

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER A
138
Include signage for direction
of travel through roundabout
• Mark direction of travel at the ingress and egress points • Add waynding signage to di
erent parking areas and uses
• Stripe high-visibility crossings by using patterns or raised crossings • Add R1-5a "YIELD HERE TO PEDESTRIANS" or W15-1 signage throughout the park • Provide short-term and long-term bicycle parking and signage through park destinations • Maintain landscaping at Project access point, internal intersections, and crosswalks to reduce sight distance con icts;
shrubs should not be higher than approximately 30 inches and tree canopies should be approximately six feet from the ground • The Project site plan should continue to be evaluated as designs progress Overall Recommendations:

Continue 10-foot minimum
sidewalk along the project
frontage with continuous
5-foot bu
er
Include a left turn pocket turning
into the park (200 feet)
Include a right turn pocket turning
into the site (min 100 feet)
Consider a southbound
right turn pocket
Fill in 10-foot minimum sidewalk
gap along the project frontage
with continuous 5-foot bu
er
Mark direction of travel at the
ingress and egress points
Consider allocating pick-up
and drop-o
locations
Mark direction of travel at the
ingress and egress points
Stripe a high-visibility crosswalk
across the western leg
Continue existing Class II bu
ered bike lanes
on both sides of the roadway along the
project frontage, consistent with the
Solano County Active Transportation Plan
Include two lanes exiting the site:
one dedicated left turn pocket
and one shared thru-right
Install raised median
along the west leg
Include two lanes entering the site:
one dedicated left turn pocket (100 feet)
and one shared thru-right
1 2
3 4
Key Study Intersections

1. Vanden Road/Matt Garcia North Access Point

2. Vanden Road/Canon Road/Matt Garcia South
Access Point

3. Matt Garcia Internal South Driveway

4. Vanden Road/New Canon Road/Canon Road
WC23-3987_5_SitePlanRec
Site Access and Circulation Recommendations
Figure 5
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
139
Emergency and Truck Access Turning Assessment
Figure 6A
1":50'
WC23-3987_6A_AutoTurn

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER A
140
Emergency and Truck Access Turning Assessment
Figure 6B
1":50'
WC23-3987_6B_AutoTurn
1":50'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
141
Emergency and Truck Access Turning Assessment
Figure 6C 1":50'
WC23-3987_6C_AutoTurn
1":50'

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER A
142
Emergency and Truck Access Turning Assessment
Figure 6D
1":50'
WC23-3987_6D_AutoTurn
1":50'1":50'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
143
Emergency and Truck Access Turning Assessment
Figure 6E
1":50'
WC23-3987_6E_AutoTurn
Lock to Lock TimeSteering AngleArticulating Angle
WB-40Tractor WidthTrailer WidthTractor TrackTrailer Track

12.50 3.00
feet

8.008.00 :8.008.00

0.00 :::

3.00 25.50

7.50 33.00
:::

6.020.370.0
144 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Appendix A: LOS Calculation
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
145
HCM 6th TWSC Matt Garcia Park
1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 10 0 1320 914 8
Future Vol, veh/h 0 10 0 1320 914 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 11 0 1435 993 9
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 501 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 515 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 515 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 0 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 515 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.021 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - -
146 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project AM
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 25
Average Queue (ft) 5
95th Queue (ft) 22
Link Distance (ft) 750
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
147
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Matt Garcia Park 2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 14 55 1297 907 17
Future Volume (veh/h) 23 14 55 1297 907 17
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 0 60 1410 986 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 45 40 78 3145 2830 1262
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.88 0.80 0.80
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 3647 3647 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 25 0 60 1410 986 11
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1777 1777 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 3.3 7.6 7.8 0.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 3.3 7.6 7.8 0.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 45 40 78 3145 2830 1262
V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.77 0.45 0.35 0.01
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 293 240 3145 2830 1262
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.2 0.0 47.3 1.1 2.9 2.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.6 0.0 7.8 0.2 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 1.6 0.1 1.6 0.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.8 0.0 55.1 1.3 3.2 2.1
LnGrp LOS E A E A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 25 1470 997
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.8 3.5 3.2
Approach LOS E A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 93.0 7.0 8.9 84.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 72.5 18.5 13.5 54.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 3.4 5.3 9.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 14.4 0.0 0.1 7.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 3.9
HCM 6th LOS A
148 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queues Matt Garcia Park
2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 15 60 1410 986 18
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.13 0.39 0.43 0.35 0.01
Control Delay 47.2 22.0 49.6 1.7 4.9 2.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 47.2 22.0 49.6 1.7 4.9 2.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 0 37 0 58 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 20 75 127 181 7
Internal Link Dist (ft) 126 1579 1530
Turn Bay Length (ft) 310 190
Base Capacity (vph) 327 305 238 3294 2832 1270
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.05 0.25 0.43 0.35 0.01
Intersection Summary
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
149
HCM 6th AWSC Matt Garcia Park
3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1 43 22 7 0 1 31 4 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1 43 22 7 0 1 31 4 1 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1 47 24 8 0 1 34 4 1 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 1
HCM Control Delay 7.1 7.8 6.7 7.4

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 25% 100% 0% 80%
Vol Thru, % 3% 50% 0% 76% 20%
Vol Right, % 97% 25% 0% 24% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 4 43 29 5
LT Vol 0 1 43 0 4
Through Vol 1 2 0 22 1
RT Vol 31 1 0 7 0
Lane Flow Rate 35 4 47 32 5
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.034 0.005 0.066 0.039 0.006
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.497 4.062 5.107 4.438 4.262
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 1010 878 704 810 831
Service Time 1.565 2.099 2.816 2.146 2.332
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 0.005 0.067 0.04 0.006
HCM Control Delay 6.7 7.1 8.2 7.3 7.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 0
150 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project AM
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Movement WB WB NB
Directions Served L TR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 51 54 28
Average Queue (ft) 26 22 22
95th Queue (ft) 53 55 40
Link Distance (ft) 114 114 237
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
151
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Matt Garcia Park 4: Vanden Road & New Canon Road/Canon Road Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 250 0 131 55 0 20 146 1082 73 140 755 26 Future Volume (veh/h) 250 0 131 55 0 20 146 1082 73 140 755 26 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 272 0 19 60 0 1 159 1176 40 152 821 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 305 0 279 77 0 76 500 1846 823 109 1066 476
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.00 0.18 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.52 0.52 0.06 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 272 0 19 60 0 1 159 1176 40 152 821 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.4 0.0 0.9 3.0 0.0 0.1 6.3 21.4 1.1 5.5 18.9 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.4 0.0 0.9 3.0 0.0 0.1 6.3 21.4 1.1 5.5 18.9 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 0 279 77 0 76 500 1846 823 109 1066 476 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.00 0.07 0.78 0.00 0.01 0.32 0.64 0.05 1.40 0.77 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 307 0 439 170 0 317 500 1846 823 109 1066 476 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.5 0.0 30.9 42.6 0.0 40.8 25.6 15.5 10.7 42.3 28.7 8.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.9 0.0 0.1 15.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.7 0.1 222.7 5.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln8.0 0.0 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.6 7.9 0.4 9.0 8.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.4 0.0 31.0 57.8 0.0 40.9 25.9 17.2 10.8 264.9 33.8 8.4 LnGrp LOS E A C E A D C B B F C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 291 61 1375 986
Approach Delay, s/veh 60.3 57.5 18.0 69.1
Approach LOS E E B E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.0 51.2 8.4 20.3 29.7 31.5 19.9 8.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 33.0 8.6 24.9 11.5 27.0 15.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 23.4 5.0 2.9 8.3 20.9 15.4 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.0
HCM 6th LOS D
152 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
HCM 6th TWSC Matt Garcia Park
1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 43 0 1524 1203 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 43 0 1524 1203 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 47 0 1657 1308 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 666 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 402 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 402 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.1 0 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 402 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.116 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - -
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
153
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project PM
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 30
Average Queue (ft) 17
95th Queue (ft) 41
Link Distance (ft) 750
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
154 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Matt Garcia Park 2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 62 172 1422 1195 51
Future Volume (veh/h) 102 62 172 1422 1195 51
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 111 5 187 1546 1299 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 141 125 222 2953 2349 1048
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.83 0.66 0.66
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 3647 3647 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 111 5 187 1546 1299 26
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1777 1777 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.1 0.3 10.3 13.0 19.5 0.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.1 0.3 10.3 13.0 19.5 0.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 141 125 222 2953 2349 1048
V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.04 0.84 0.52 0.55 0.02
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 240 214 365 2953 2349 1048
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.58 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.2 42.5 42.8 2.5 9.1 5.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.4 0.1 5.4 0.4 0.9 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 0.3 4.7 1.7 6.3 1.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.6 42.7 48.2 2.9 10.0 5.9
LnGrp LOS D D D A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 116 1733 1325
Approach Delay, s/veh 54.1 7.8 9.9
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.6 12.4 17.0 70.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 77.5 13.5 20.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.0 8.1 12.3 21.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 17.1 0.1 0.3 10.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.4
HCM 6th LOS B
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
155
Queues Matt Garcia Park
2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 67 187 1546 1299 55
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.29 0.68 0.55 0.61 0.06
Control Delay 53.5 13.4 52.0 4.6 15.4 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 53.5 13.4 52.0 4.6 15.4 3.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 0 114 146 261 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 39 177 206 390 19
Internal Link Dist (ft) 126 1579 1530
Turn Bay Length (ft) 310 190
Base Capacity (vph) 238 271 362 2830 2120 969
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.25 0.52 0.55 0.61 0.06
Intersection Summary
156 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
HCM 6th AWSC Matt Garcia Park
3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 10 3 134 67 22 0 3 138 16 3 0
Future Vol, veh/h 3 10 3 134 67 22 0 3 138 16 3 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 11 3 146 73 24 0 3 150 17 3 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 9 7.8 8.1

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 19% 100% 0% 84%
Vol Thru, % 2% 62% 0% 75% 16%
Vol Right, % 98% 19% 0% 25% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 141 16 134 89 19
LT Vol 0 3 134 0 16
Through Vol 3 10 0 67 3
RT Vol 138 3 0 22 0
Lane Flow Rate 153 17 146 97 21
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.171 0.022 0.216 0.126 0.028
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.016 4.613 5.347 4.672 4.909
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 898 777 664 757 732
Service Time 2.019 2.636 3.14 2.464 2.921
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.17 0.022 0.22 0.128 0.029
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.7 9.6 8.1 8.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.4 0.1
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
157
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project PM
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Movement EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 31 95 76 76 26
Average Queue (ft) 12 64 47 43 10
95th Queue (ft) 37 103 77 74 30
Link Distance (ft) 327 114 114 237 284
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
158 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Matt Garcia Park 4: Vanden Road & New Canon Road/Canon Road Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 175 0 54 78 0 40 297 1379 17 60 892 305 Future Volume (veh/h) 175 0 54 78 0 40 297 1379 17 60 892 305 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 190 0 5 85 0 2 323 1499 10 65 970 140 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 208 0 167 109 0 79 610 2084 930 83 1035 461
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.34 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 190 0 5 85 0 2 323 1499 10 65 970 140 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 0.3 4.2 0.0 0.1 13.1 27.1 0.2 3.2 24.0 4.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 0.3 4.2 0.0 0.1 13.1 27.1 0.2 3.2 24.0 4.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 208 0 167 109 0 79 610 2084 930 83 1035 461 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.03 0.53 0.72 0.01 0.78 0.94 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 208 0 328 196 0 317 610 2084 930 99 1035 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.3 0.0 36.1 41.6 0.0 40.7 23.8 13.3 7.7 42.4 31.1 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 39.5 0.0 0.1 11.1 0.0 0.1 0.9 2.2 0.0 22.1 13.6 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln6.4 0.0 0.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 5.2 9.4 0.1 1.9 11.4 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 78.8 0.0 36.2 52.7 0.0 40.8 24.7 15.5 7.8 64.6 44.7 13.3 LnGrp LOS E A D D A D C B A E D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 195 87 1832 1175
Approach Delay, s/veh 77.7 52.4 17.1 42.0
Approach LOS E D B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.7 57.3 10.0 14.0 35.3 30.7 15.0 9.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 38.5 9.9 18.6 17.3 26.2 10.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 29.1 6.2 2.3 15.1 26.0 11.5 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.5
HCM 6th LOS C
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
159
HCM 6th TWSC Matt Garcia Park
1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Cumulative Plus Project Saturday Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 1078 927 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 1078 927 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 66 0 1172 1008 29
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 519 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 502 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 502 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 502 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.132 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 13.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.5 - -
160 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project Saturday
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia North Access Point Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 72
Average Queue (ft) 30
95th Queue (ft) 51
Link Distance (ft) 750
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
161
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Matt Garcia Park 2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project Saturday Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 142 87 207 936 926 62
Future Volume (veh/h) 142 87 207 936 926 62
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 154 10 225 1017 1007 27
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 191 170 265 2817 2110 941
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.79 0.59 0.59
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 3647 3647 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 10 225 1017 1007 27
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1777 1777 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.5 11.1 7.5 14.5 0.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.5 11.1 7.5 14.5 0.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 191 170 265 2817 2110 941
V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.06 0.85 0.36 0.48 0.03
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 327 291 426 2817 2110 941
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.2 36.1 37.3 2.7 10.4 7.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 0.1 7.6 0.3 0.8 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.7 0.5 5.1 1.3 4.9 1.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.0 36.2 44.9 3.0 11.1 7.6
LnGrp LOS D D D A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 164 1242 1034
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.3 10.6 11.1
Approach LOS D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 75.8 14.2 17.9 57.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.5 16.5 21.5 38.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.5 9.6 13.1 16.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.3 0.2 0.4 6.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.2
HCM 6th LOS B
162 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queues Matt Garcia Park
2: Vanden Road & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project Saturday Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 95 225 1017 1007 67
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.31 0.70 0.38 0.54 0.08
Control Delay 46.5 10.1 45.8 4.5 16.9 4.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.5 10.1 45.8 4.5 16.9 4.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 83 0 121 84 191 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 140 40 185 132 303 23
Internal Link Dist (ft) 126 1579 1530
Turn Bay Length (ft) 310 190
Base Capacity (vph) 324 367 422 2683 1861 864
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.26 0.53 0.38 0.54 0.08
Intersection Summary
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Traffic Study
163
HCM 6th AWSC Matt Garcia Park
3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Cumulative Plus Project Saturday Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 14 5 161 81 27 0 5 193 22 5 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 14 5 161 81 27 0 5 193 22 5 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 15 5 175 88 29 0 5 210 24 5 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 1
HCM Control Delay 8.1 9.7 8.6 8.4

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 21% 100% 0% 81%
Vol Thru, % 3% 58% 0% 75% 19%
Vol Right, % 97% 21% 0% 25% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 198 24 161 108 27
LT Vol 0 5 161 0 22
Through Vol 5 14 0 81 5
RT Vol 193 5 0 27 0
Lane Flow Rate 215 26 175 117 29
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.25 0.035 0.272 0.16 0.042
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.178 4.841 5.589 4.91 5.131
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 861 736 642 729 697
Service Time 2.2 2.893 3.331 2.653 3.169
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.25 0.035 0.273 0.16 0.042
HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.1 10.4 8.6 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A B A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.1 1.1 0.6 0.1
164 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX D
Queuing and Blocking Report Matt Garcia Park
Cumulative Plus Project Saturday
Fehr & Peers SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Matt Garcia Internal Dwy & Matt Garcia South Access Point Movement EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 51 92 95 209 48
Average Queue (ft) 17 59 43 56 13
95th Queue (ft) 45 93 79 117 36
Link Distance (ft) 327 114 114 237 284
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 165

APPENDIX E
Environmental Site
Assessment - Phase 1
The environmental site assessment
for the first construction phase
of Matt Garcia Community Park
was conducted by NCE March
2022. Provided in this appendix is
a memorandum of the complete
analysis and its findings.

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN
166 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment - Final
Proposed Matt Garcia Park
Fairfield, CA
March 2022
Prepared for:

Gates and Associates
Casey Case
1655 North Main Street, Suite 365
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Prepared by:

Matthew Kinney
Staff Geologist
Mary Snow, PG, PMP
Senior Geologist
NCE
8795 Folsom Blvd., Ste. #250
Sacramento, CA 95826
(916) 388-5655
NCE Project No. 1170.01.55
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
167

MATT GARCIA PARK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 i
Executive Summary
At the request of Gates and Associates, NCE conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the approximate 50-acre planned Matt Garcia Community Park (Site), located west of Vanden Road and approximately 800 feet north of the intersection of Vanden Road and Canon Road (Figures 1 and 2) in Fairfield, Solano County, California.

The Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E1527- 21 (ASTM 2021) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Final Rule. ESA activities included reviewing readily available information and environmental data relating to a property; interviewing readily available persons knowledgeable about the Site; reviewing readily available maps, aerial photographs and records maintained by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies; and conducting a site visit.

PURPOSE
This Phase I ESA was requested to support a change in use of the Site from agricultural/commercial to a public park. The primary purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify, to the extent feasible:
• Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) resulting from the improper use, manufacture, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at the Site and surrounding properties.
• Historical RECs (HRECs), a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. • Controlled RECs (CRECs), a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.

This ESA is also intended to satisfy the level of effort often referred to as AAI in the Comprehensive, Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 USC § 9601, with the objective of allowing a potential buyer of the Site to qualify for the landowner liability protections afforded by CERCLA. The qualifications of the Environmental Professional completing this ESA and responsible for preparation of this report meet those standards included in the AAI Final Rule. 168 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 ii

FINDINGS
Based on the review of available historical information, and verified through a visit to the Site by NCE personnel, the Site has been used as agricultural land since at least 1937. The Site and surrounding areas consist of agricultural land with residences and associated farming improvements, undeveloped land, and ranching.

Vanden Road is adjacent to the east of the Site and is the main thoroughfare for the area. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) is east of and parallel to Vanden Road.

Based on the Site reconnaissance and a review of historical documents, the Site and surrounding area follow this general timeline:
• By 1908, the Site is undeveloped with some roads and few buildings in the surrounding area, including dirt roads along the northern and southern Site boundaries, and present-day Vanden Road along the eastern perimeter of the Site. A seasonal stream transects the Site from the northwest to the southeast. The Site appears to be part of a larger farm. • By 1952, a residence and agricultural outbuildings are present west of the Site.
• By 1980, the seasonal stream is now an engineered creek bordering the eastern, southern, and southeastern perimeter of the Site. • In mid-2017, the central portion of the Site (near the eastern Site boundary) contains an area of uncultivated land with soil stockpiles.

ON-SITE
RECs in connection with the Site are identified below.
• Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) is lead originating from automotive exhaust gases that settles in soils near roadways. ADL is commonly found in shallow soils (as deep as three feet) near roadways that existed during the time that gasoline contained lead. Leaded gasoline was outlawed in California in 1992.

Vanden Road has existed adjacent to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1937. ADL is a constituent of potential concern (COPC) in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary near Vanden Road.
• Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) are a set of pesticides including DDT that were commonly used in agricultural settings beginning in the 1940s through the mid-1970s, when they were found to be carcinogenic to humans and a threat to wildlife. OCPs are resilient compounds that persist in shallow soil for decades in agricultural areas. The Site was used as a farm during the time that OCPs were applied to crops. OCPs are COPCs at the Site. • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) are semi-volatile organic compounds that have historical presence in lubricants and hydraulic fluids, and are produced when coal, oil, gasoline, and wood are burned. The presence of PAHs in soil is associated with historical railroad activities.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
169

MATT GARCIA PARK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 iii
Railroad tracks have existed parallel to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1908. PAHs are a COPC in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary. • A small 5- to 10-yard soil stockpile is present in the eastern central portion of the Site (Photo 21). Historical Google Earth imagery dating back to May 2017 shows this area of the Site was not cultivated, and vehicular work was present in the area. Two small stockpiles appear in Google Earth images beginning after this time. Stockpiles of unknown origin can contain COPCs generated from on-site and off-site activities.

Additional items of concern identified at the Site are listed below. • A 20-inch diameter Kinder Morgan underground fuel transmission line is beneath the Site along its eastern boundary (Figure 2). According to on-site Kinder Morgan personnel, the depth of this facility ranges from 4 to 7 feet and is deeper where the line crosses under Union Creek in the southern portion of the Site.

Work performed when developing Matt Garcia Community Park should occur with knowledge of the location and depth of this sensitive infrastructure. • A small amount of highly weathered treated wood waste (TWW) is located near the eastern Site boundary in the central portion of the Site. Historical wood treatment practices included the use of hazardous chemicals including pentachlorophenol, chromium (including hexavalent chromium), and arsenic.

Any leaching of COPCs from this small amount of TWW would be considered de minimis and does not warrant further investigation.

In the state of California, TWW is considered Class 1 Waste as of August 31, 2021, and must be disposed of at an appropriate facility. Recology Hay Road Landfill accepts disposal of TWW.
• Black mesh fencing delineates a section of land in the southeastern portion of the Site, extending from the southern Site boundary north along the eastern Site boundary (Figure 2). Mr. Doug Gilman, a City of Fairfield inspector, indicated that the fencing is in place to shield a protected species of salamander from farming operations on the Site.

Consult a biologist familiar with local fauna to determine the appropriate steps to ensure continued protection of this species of salamander.

Historical aerial photographs and topographic maps, and NCE’s Site reconnaissance indicate dry farming was identified as the only land use on the Site since at least 1908. No historical or current structures or improvements were identified.

OFF-SITE
RECs in connection with the Site and originating off-site are identified below. 170 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 iv
• Arsenic is a toxic heavy metal and is a historical component of weed abatement chemicals. Weed abatement chemicals containing arsenic were commonly used near railroad lines. The UPRR has existed parallel to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1908. Arsenic is a COPC in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA as described above, NCE recommends further action be taken to determine the presence of COPCs at the Site. • To determine the presence of ADL, arsenic, and PAHs at the Site, conduct shallow soil sampling and analysis as part of a Limited Phase II ESA near the eastern Site boundary.
• To determine the presence of OCPs at the Site, conduct shallow soil sampling and analysis as part of a Limited Phase II ESA across the Site. • To determine the suitability of the soil stockpile to be reused at the Site, or the manner in which it can be disposed, collect and analyze soil for the presence of metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, SVOCs, and OCPs as part of a Limited Phase II ESA.
• To properly dispose of TWW currently located on the Site, consult the DTSC Managing Hazardous Waste website Treated Wood Waste (TWW) | Department of Toxic Substances Control (ca.gov). The Recology Hay Road Landfill in Vacaville accepts disposal of treated wood waste. • To ensure the safety of workers developing and constructing Matt Garcia Community Park and the integrity of the subsurface Kinder Morgan fuel line (Figure 2), clearly and accurately delineate the location and depth of this sensitive infrastructure prior to improving the Site.
• To ensure the proper steps are taken to address the presence of a protected native species of salamander on the Site, consult a biologist who is familiar with local fauna to determine appropriate and necessary actions.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
171

MATT GARCIA PARK

TABLE OF CONTENTS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 Table of Contents
1 Introduction.......................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope ............................................................................................. 2

1.3 Data Gaps ....................................................................................... 3 2 Site Salient Assignment Information .................................................4 3 Site Description .................................................................................5

3.1 Site Location.................................................................................... 5

3.2 Physical Site Setting ......................................................................... 5

3.2.1 Topography ............................................................................... 5

3.2.2 Surface Waters and Wetlands ....................................................... 5

3.2.3 Geology, Groundwater and Seismicity............................................ 5

3.3 Current Site Use............................................................................... 6

3.4 Utilities ........................................................................................... 6

3.5 Surrounding Land Use....................................................................... 7 4 Historical Use.....................................................................................8

4.1 Historical Topographic Maps............................................................... 8

4.2 Historical Aerial Photographs.............................................................. 9

4.3 Historical Fire Insurance Maps .......................................................... 11

4.4 Building Permits ............................................................................. 11

4.5 City Directory ................................................................................ 12

4.6 Chain-of-Ownership........................................................................ 12

4.7 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations .......................... 12

4.8 Property Tax Map Report................................................................. 12

4.9 Regulatory Actions and Previous Reports ........................................... 12 5 Regulatory Review...........................................................................13

5.1 Radius Map Report ......................................................................... 13

5.1.1 EnviroStor ............................................................................... 16

5.2 GeoTracker.................................................................................... 17 6 Interviews .......................................................................................18

6.1 Present Owners.............................................................................. 18

6.2 Title Records.................................................................................. 18

6.3 Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value ............................. 18 172 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

TABLE OF CONTENTS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 i

6.4 Common Knowledge or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .............. 18

6.5 Historical Site Use .......................................................................... 18

6.6 Proceedings Involving the Site ......................................................... 18

6.7 Occupants ..................................................................................... 19

6.8 Past Owners .................................................................................. 19 7 Site Reconnaissance ........................................................................20

7.1 Summary of Observations ............................................................... 20

7.2 Chemical Storage and Usage............................................................ 21

7.3 Bulk Storage Tanks......................................................................... 21

7.4 Site Waste and Wastewater ............................................................. 21

7.4.1 Solid Waste.............................................................................. 21

7.4.2 Sanitary Sewage ...................................................................... 21

7.4.3 Hazardous Waste...................................................................... 21

7.5 Stained Soil, Stained Pavement, of Stressed Vegetation....................... 21

7.6 Liquid Discharges ........................................................................... 21

7.7 Pools of Liquid ............................................................................... 21

7.8 Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons ................................................................... 21

7.9 Wells ............................................................................................ 22

7.10 On-site Fill .................................................................................... 22

7.11 Drums and Containers for Storing Waste ........................................... 22

7.12 Floor Drains and Sumps .................................................................. 22

7.13 Odors ........................................................................................... 22

7.14 Air Emissions ................................................................................. 22

7.15 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ...................................................... 22

7.16 Asbestos-Containing Materials.......................................................... 22

7.17 Lead-Containing Materials ............................................................... 23

7.17.1 Lead in Drinking Water (LIW) ..................................................... 23

7.17.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) ............................................................. 23

7.18 Radon........................................................................................... 23 8 Findings and Recommendations.......................................................24

8.1 On-site Findings ............................................................................. 24

8.1.1 Aerially Deposited Lead ............................................................. 24

8.1.2 Organochlorine Pesticides .......................................................... 24

8.1.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ............................................... 25 CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
173

MATT GARCIA PARK

TABLE OF CONTENTS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 ii

8.1.4 Soil Stockpile of Unknown Origin................................................. 25

8.2 Additional Items of Concern............................................................. 25

8.2.1 Underground Fuel Transmission Line ........................................... 25

8.2.2 Treated Wood Waste ................................................................. 25

8.2.3 Protected Salamander Species .................................................... 26

8.3 Off-site Findings............................................................................. 26

8.4 Recommendations .......................................................................... 26 9 Limitations.......................................................................................28 10 References.......................................................................................30 Distribution and Quality Control
List of Figures
Figure 1. ................................................................................Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. ..................................................................................Site Detail Map List of Appendices
A. Radius Map Report
B. Historical Topographic Maps
C. Historical Aerial Photographs
D. Sanborn Maps
E. Building Permit Report
F. City Directory Report
G. Environmental Lien and AUL Search
H. Property Tax Map Report
I. Pre-Survey Questionnaire
J. Photo Log
174 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 iii
List of Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
AAI All Appropriate Inquiries
ACM Asbestos-containing Materials
ADL Aerially Deposited Lead
AMSD Approximate Minimum Search Distance
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
AUL Activity and Use Limitations
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
CGS California Geological Survey
COPC Chemical of Potential Concern
CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition
EDR Environmental Database Resources, Inc.

EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Condition
PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls
REC Recognized Environmental Condition
Site Matt Garcia Community Park
SVOC Semi-volatile Organic Compound
TWW Treated Wood Waste
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
175

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTRODUCTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 1 1 Introduction
At the request of Gates and Associates (Gates), NCE conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the approximately 50-acre proposed Matt Garcia Community Park (Site), a current dry farming operation that the City of Fairfield plans to develop for public use. The Site is located on the west side of Vanden Road, approximately 800 feet north of the intersection of Vanden Road and Canon Road in Fairfield, Solano County, California (see Figures 1 and 2).

The Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-21) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “All Appropriate Inquiries” (AAI) Final Rule (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 312).

This report presents the Phase I ESA findings and recommendations regarding environmental conditions associated with the Site.

1.1 PURPOSE
This Phase I ESA was requested to support a change in use of the Site from agricultural/commercial to a public park. The primary purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible:
• Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) resulting from the improper use, manufacture, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at the Site and surrounding properties. ASTM E1527-21 defines the term RECs as:
“(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.”
• Historical RECs (HRECs) – a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority and meets unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any controls.
• Controlled RECs (CRECs) – a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has 176 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTRODUCTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 2 been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place, subject to the implementation of required controls.

The Phase I ESA was also prepared to satisfy the level of effort often referred to as AAI in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 United States Code § 9601, with the objective of allowing a potential buyer of the Site to qualify for the landowner liability protections afforded by CERCLA. The qualifications of the Environmental Professional completing this ESA and responsible for preparation of this report meet those standards included in the AAI Final Rule.

1.2 SCOPE
The scope of the Phase I ESA for the Site included the following:
• Review readily available environmental databases maintained by federal, state, and local agencies. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), of Shelton, Connecticut, provided the Radius Map Report, which is attached as Appendix A.
• Review readily available historical documents, including topographic maps, aerial photographs, certified Sanborn fire insurance maps, building permit report, city directory report, an environmental lien and activity and use limitation (AUL) search, and property tax map report to look at previous facilities and activities on and in the vicinity of the Site. Copies of these documents are included in Appendices B through H.
• Develop and deliver Pre-Survey Questionnaire (Questionnaire). The questionnaire was emailed Gates on February 14, 2021, who then forwarded the Questionnaire to the City of Fairfield. As of February 28, 2022, the Questionnaire has not been returned to NCE.
• Conduct Site reconnaissance:
o Visually observe on-site conditions for evidence of environmental impacts, such as soil-staining, stressed vegetation, ponded liquids, mounded soils, excavations, discarded drums, or monitoring wells o Identify potential environmental concerns such as underground storage tanks, aboveground storage tanks, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing materials, or other hazardous materials or wastes present at the Site.
o Assess the Site with respect to surrounding property uses and natural surface features.
• Review available documents such as previously prepared environmental reports.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
177

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTRODUCTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 3 • Review United States Fish and Wildlife Service-identified wetlands within and in the vicinity of the Site.
• Review published radon occurrence maps to assess if the Site is located in an area with a propensity for elevated radon concentrations. • Prepare report summarizing the findings of the investigation.

1.3 DATA GAPS
According to ASTM E1527-21 §3.3.21, a data gap is a lack of, or inability to obtain, required information despite good-faith efforts to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by the ASTM Standard. Data gaps identified during this Phase I ESA are summarized in the following table:

Data Gap Explanation Significance of Gap
A Questionnaire
was submitted
to Gates but
was not
returned as of
the delivery of
this ESA.

The Questionnaire was
submitted to Gates on
February 14, 2022, who
then forwarded the
Questionnaire to the City of
Fairfield. A response was
not received by the time
this ESA was completed.

The Site visit, review of historical
documents, database search, and
aerial photo investigations
provided adequate information to
understand the Site history. It is
unlikely that interviews with the
Site owner or state, federal, or
local government officials would
alter the outcome of the analysis.

Interviews were
not conducted
with the Site
owner, state,
federal, or local
government
officials.

It was not deemed critical
to contact state, federal, or
local government officials to
understand the presence of
RECs, HRECs or CRECs, or
potential RECs, HRECs or
CRECs in connection with
the Site.

The Site visit, review of historical
documents, database search, and
aerial photo investigations
provided adequate information to
understand the Site history. It is
unlikely that interviews with the
Site owner or state, federal, or
local government officials would
alter the outcome of the analysis.
178 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE SALIENT ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 4 2 Site Salient Assignment Information
NCE Project No.: 1170.01.55
Project Name: Matt Garcia Community Park
Assessor Parcel Numbers: Not Available
City, County, State and Zip: Fairfield, Solano County, California 95687 Primary Use: Dry Farming
Age of Improvements: None
Site Area: 50 Acres
Reported Number of
Tenants:

None
Number of Buildings: 0
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
179

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE DESCRIPTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 5 3 Site Description

3.1 SITE LOCATION
The Site is located in a rural area within the city limits of Fairfield, California, approximately 6.3 miles northeast of the downtown area (Figure 1).

The region’s climate is characterized as Mediterranean with hot, dry summers and mild to cool, wet winters. The average precipitation is 24.81 inches (U.S. Climate Data 2022).

3.2 PHYSICAL SITE SETTING
The following subsections provide details regarding topography, surface waters, wetlands, and geology.

3.2.1 Topography
According to the United States Geological Survey dated 2018, the elevation of the Site is approximately 100 feet above mean sea level (Appendix B).

3.2.2 Surface Waters and Wetlands
Surface Waters
Union Creek is an engineered creek that is adjacent to the west, south, and southeast of the Site (Figure 2). This creek originates east of Peabody Road near California State Prison Solano in Vacaville, approximately one mile northwest of the Site. Putah South Canal is an engineered creek that is approximately 0.7 miles west of the Site. Multiple sloughs within the San Francisco Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve lie south of the City of Fairfield and Travis Air Force Base, approximately 5.5 miles south of the Site.

Wetlands
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2018 National Wetlands Inventory, there is an intermittent stream that flows along the western, southern, and southeastern portions of the Site (Union Creek).

3.2.3 Geology, Groundwater and Seismicity
Geology
The Site is located in a small valley within the eastern margin of the Coast Ranges geomorphic province, near the western edge of the Great Valley geomorphic province. This region consists of sedimentary and volcanic rocks, which form rolling hills bordering the valley in which the Site is located. These rocks range in age from Miocene to Pliocene (Thomasson Jr. et al., 1960).
180 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE DESCRIPTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 6 The Site is underlain by the Quaternary-age alluvium, a heterogeneous assemblage of fluvial deposits derived from the foothills of the Coast Ranges north of the Site.

The hills to the southwest of the Site are within the Guinda Formation. The hills to the northeast of the Site consist of Markley Sandstone. Both formations are marine in origin (California Geological Survey [CGS] 1998).

Hydrogeology
The Site is located within the San Francisco Bay Hydrologic Region as defined by the Department of Water Resources. According to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, groundwater in this region ranges from near-surface to 50 feet below the ground surface. The groundwater flow direction is typically toward the south (DWR, 2022).

According to the EDR report, public water supply wells are not located within 1 mile of the Site (Appendix A). Confirmation of specific geologic and hydrogeological factors affecting groundwater flow beneath the Site is beyond the scope of this ESA.

Seismicity
According to the CGS “Fault Activity Map of California,” the Site is underlain by the Vaca Fault block which displays evidence of late Quaternary displacement. In addition, the Kirby Hills Fault is located approximately 3 miles south of the Site. The Cordelia and Green Valley fault blocks are located approximately 6 miles west of the Site. The Midland Fault is located approximately 12 miles east of the Site (CGS 2010).

3.3 CURRENT SITE USE
Review of historical aerial photographs and topographic maps, as well as the Site reconnaissance, indicates that the Site is and has historically been used for agricultural dry farming.

3.4 UTILITIES
There are no known utilities associated with the Site, as shown in the table below.

Utility Provider
Water None known
Sanitary Sewer None known
Storm Drainage None known
Electric None known
Gas/Oil None known
Steam None known
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
181

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE DESCRIPTION FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 7 Utility Provider
Chilled Water None known

3.5 SURROUNDING LAND USE
The Solano County Zoning Designation for the Site and the surrounding unincorporated area is Agricultural within a Surface Mining Overlay Zone (A-20) (Solano County 2022). The Site is in the northern portion of the Fairfield Train Station Specific Planning area within the City of Fairfield and zoned for park. 182 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

HISTORICAL USE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 8 4 Historical Use
The historical records review included researching and examining the following records:
• Historical topographic maps (Appendix B)
• Historical aerial photographs (Appendix C)
• Historical fire insurance maps (Sanborn maps) (Appendix D) • Building Permit Report (Appendix E)
• City Directory Image Report (Appendix F)
• Environmental liens and AULs (Appendix G)
• Property tax maps (Appendix H)
The results of this review are provided below.

4.1 HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS
NCE reviewed historical topographic maps provided by EDR for years 1908, 1917, 1953, 1968, 1973, 1980, 2012, 2015, and 2018. The results of this review are provided in the following table.

Year Site Surrounding Properties
1908 The Site is depicted
adjacent to the west of a
road (present-day Vanden
Road). Minor improved
roads are adjacent to the
southern and northern
boundaries of the Site. A
seasonal creek is depicted
transecting the Site from
northwest to southeast.

There are no buildings
depicted within the Site.

A structure is depicted southwest of the
Site at the end of the minor improved
road. The Southern Pacific Railroad is
adjacent to the east of present-day
Vanden Road. A structure is depicted
approximately 500 feet west of the
northern portion of the Site. A bench
marker of 89 feet elevation is south of
the Site near the present-day
intersection of Vanden Road and Canon
Road. A bench marker of 163 feet
elevation is on a hill east of the
northern Site boundary.
1917 No substantive changes are
depicted within the Site.

No substantive changes are depicted
surrounding the Site.
1953 No substantive changes are
depicted within the Site.

Several additional structures are
depicted west of the southern portion of
the Site. The structure west of the
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
183

MATT GARCIA PARK

HISTORICAL USE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 9 Year Site Surrounding Properties
northern portion of the Site is no longer
depicted.
1968 No substantive changes are
depicted within the Site.

No substantive changes are depicted
surrounding the Site.
1973 An engineered creek is
depicted along the western
portion of the northern Site
boundary; this stream
connects to the seasonal
stream transecting the Site.

Several structures and a railroad spur
are depicted southeast of the
intersection of present-day Canon Road
and Vanden Road.
1980 The seasonal stream is now
depicted as an engineered
creek adjacent to the
eastern, southern, and
southeastern Site
boundaries.

No substantive changes are depicted
surrounding the Site.
2012-
2018
No structures are depicted
on this map. The
engineered creek is depicted
as Union Creek.

No substantive changes are depicted
surrounding the Site.

4.2 HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Historical aerial photographs frequently provide visual documentation of Site conditions at the time of the photographs. Activities such as dumping or industrial use can often be discerned through the review of aerial photographs. NCE reviewed historical aerial photographs for the years 1937, 1952, 1968, 1974, 1984, 1993, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 from EDR (Appendix C), along with aerial images publicly provided by Google Earth for the Site and surrounding areas. In Google Earth, where there were multiple photographs available for a single year, the highlights from those photographs are summarized. The following table provides a summary of the findings.

Site Location
Year Site Surrounding Areas Source(s)
1937 The Site appears to be
part of a larger
A residence and several
agricultural outbuildings are
EDR
184 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

HISTORICAL USE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 10 Site Location
Year Site Surrounding Areas Source(s)
agricultural dry farming
operation. A meandering
creek transects the Site in
a northwest-southeast
direction. An unimproved
road transects the central
portion of the Site in an
east-west direction from
the creek to beyond the
western Site boundary.

Several trees are adjacent
to the southern Site
boundary.
west of the Site. A minor road
is adjacent to the southern Site
boundary. Vanden Road is
adjacent to the eastern Site
boundary. South of the Site,
Canon Road intersects Vanden
Road from the east.

Surrounding land appears to
be used for agricultural dry
farming. A railroad appears
parallel to present day Vanden
Road.
1952 Site appears substantively
the same.

No substantive changes appear
surrounding the Site.

EDR
1968 An engineered creek
appears along the western
portion of the northern
Site boundary and
connecting to the creek
transecting the Site. The
creek transecting the Site
now meanders to a lesser
magnitude.

Multiple structures and corrals
are southeast of the
intersection of Vanden Road
and Canon Road. An
engineered creek is northeast
of the Site.

EDR
1974 Site appears substantively
the same.

No substantive changes appear
surrounding the Site.

EDR
1984 The engineered creek now
appears adjacent to the
eastern, southern, and
southeastern Site
boundaries, and no longer
transects the Site.

High voltage electrical
transmission lines are parallel
and east of Vanden Road and
the railroad. The minor road
transecting the Site from the
creek beyond the western Site
boundary no longer appears.

EDR
1993 Site appears substantively
the same.

No substantive changes appear
surrounding the Site.

EDR
2006-
2012
A low-lying area denoted
by darker shades of green
vegetation appears within
the Site in the general
A low-lying area denoted by
darker shades of green
vegetation appears north of
EDR
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
185

MATT GARCIA PARK

HISTORICAL USE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 11 Site Location
Year Site Surrounding Areas Source(s)
location of the former
creek.
the Site in the general location
of the former creek.
2016-
2021
An area of uncultivated
land with green vegetation
is in the eastern-central
portion of the Site
appearing in a May 2017
image from Google Earth.

Evidence of vehicular
traffic appears within this
area. Two small stockpiles
of soil appear in this
location through the most
recent Google Earth image
captured in September
2021.

No substantive changes appear
surrounding the Site.

EDR and
Google
Earth

4.3 HISTORICAL FIRE INSURANCE MAPS
Sanborn Maps constitute a source of prior site uses for many cities and towns in the United States. The maps were originally created to assist insurance underwriters in understanding the potential fire risk of structures requiring insurance; however, they are also useful in determining the previous uses of a site. Sanborn Maps often contain information relating to uses of individual structures, locations of certain petroleum and chemical storage tanks, and the storage of other potentially toxic substances. Sanborn Maps began their coverage in 1867 and continued through the 1990s.

NCE requested EDR to conduct a search for available Sanborn Maps. EDR reported that Sanborn Map coverage was not available for the Site (report of findings is included as Appendix D). Searching an information source such as Sanborn Maps constitutes part of the due-diligence necessary for an ESA. The lack of Sanborn Mapping suggests that there was no historical industrial activity on or in the immediate vicinity of the Site, or simply that no Sanborn mapping was conducted in this area.

4.4 BUILDING PERMITS
NCE requested EDR to conduct a search for building permits at and in the vicinity of the Site. No building permits in connection with the Site or in the vicinity of the Site were identified during the search (report of findings included in Appendix E). 186 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

HISTORICAL USE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 12 4.5 CITY DIRECTORY
NCE requested EDR to conduct a search of historical directory listings in connection with the Site and surrounding area. The search included records dating back to 1963. The records included no information for the Site. Listings for surrounding properties included primarily private residences along with a storage business, towing service, elementary school, an auto parts business, and an auto dismantler.

The City Directory Report is included as Appendix F.

4.6 CHAIN-OF-OWNERSHIP
NCE understands that the Site is currently owned by the City of Fairfield. No information was available regarding previous owner(s) of the Site.

4.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS AND ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS A search for environmental liens and AULs was also performed for the Site. No environmental liens or AULs were identified as part of the search. Details are provided in Appendix G.

4.8 PROPERTY TAX MAP REPORT
A search for property tax maps was performed by EDR. The search did not identify any property tax maps in connection with the Site. A copy of the Property Tax Map Report is provided as Appendix H.

4.9 REGULATORY ACTIONS AND PREVIOUS REPORTS
No regulatory actions or previous reports were provided for the Site or discovered in our records search. As stated in Section 4.7, there were no environmental liens or AULs identified in connection with the Site.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
187

MATT GARCIA PARK

REGULATORY REVIEW FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 13 5 Regulatory Review

5.1 RADIUS MAP REPORT
As part of this Phase I ESA, NCE conducted a records search using electronic database services provided by EDR. The Radius Report is a listing of facilities identified on select federal and state standard source environmental databases within the approximate minimum search distances specified by ASTM E1527-21 and EPA’s AAI.

NCE reviewed each environmental database in the EDR Radius Report. The following table shows a list of the databases searched and the number of facilities listed in each database.

Databases Reviewed
Minimum Search
Distance (MSD)
(Miles)
Number of
Facilities
Within
AMSD
Federal Databases
NPL 1.000 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0
Delisted NPL 1.000 0
FEDERAL FACILTITY 0.500 0
SEMS 0.500 0
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0
CORRACTS 1.000 0
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0
RCRA – LQG 0.250 0
RCRA – SQG 0.250 0
RCRA – VSQG 0.250 0
LUCIS 0.500 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0
US INST CONTROL 0.500 0
ERNS 0.001 0
State and Tribal Databases
RESPONSE 1.000 0
ENVIROSTOR 1.000 1
SWF/LF 0.500 0
LUST 0.500 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0
CPS-SLIC 0.500 0
Sacramento Co. CS 0.500 0
FEMA UST 0.250 0
UST 0.250 0
AST 0.250 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0
VCP 0.500 0
188 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

REGULATORY REVIEW FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 14 Databases Reviewed
Minimum Search
Distance (MSD)
(Miles)
Number of
Facilities
Within
AMSD
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0
WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0
SWRCY 0.500 0
HAULERS 0.001 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0
ODI 0.500 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0
US HIST CDL 0.001 0
HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 0
SCH 0.250 0
CDL 0.001 0
Toxic Pits 1.000 0
CERS HAZ WASTE 0.250 0
US CDL 0.001 0
PFAS 0.500 0
Local Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST 0.250 0
HIST UST 0.250 0
CERS TANKS 0.250 0
CA FID UST 0.250 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 0.001 0
LIENS 2 0.001 0
DEED 0.500 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0
CHMIRS 0.001 0
LDS 0.001 0
MCS 0.001 0
SPILLS 90 0.001 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NONGEN/NLR 0.250 0
FUDS 1.000 0
DOD 1.000 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0
TSCA 0.001 0
TRIS 0.001 0
SSTS 0.001 0
ROD 1.000 0
RMP 0.001 0
RAATS 0.001 0
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
189

MATT GARCIA PARK

REGULATORY REVIEW FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 15 Databases Reviewed
Minimum Search
Distance (MSD)
(Miles)
Number of
Facilities
Within
AMSD
PRP 0.001 0
PADS 0.001 0
ICIS 0.001 0
FTTS 0.001 0
MLTS 0.001 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0
RADINFO 0.001 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0
CONSENT 1.000 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0
UMTRA 0.500 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0
US AIRS 0.001 0
US MINES 0.250 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0
FINDS 0.001 0
ECHO 0.001 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0
UXO 1.000 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0
CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0
Cortese 0.500 0
CUPA Listings 0.250 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0
EMI 0.001 0
ENF 0.001 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0
HAZNET 0.001 0
ICE 0.001 0
HIST CORTESE 0.500 0
HWP 1.000 0
HWT 0.250 0
MINES 0.250 0
Sacramento Co. ML 0.250 0
MWMP 0.250 0
NPDES 0.001 0
PEST LIC 0.001 0
PROC 0.500 0
NOTIFY 65 1.000 0
UIC 0.001 0
WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0
WDS 0.001 0
190 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

REGULATORY REVIEW FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 16 Databases Reviewed
Minimum Search
Distance (MSD)
(Miles)
Number of
Facilities
Within
AMSD
WIP 0.250 0
MILITARY PRIV. SITES 0.001 0
PROJECT 0.001 0
WDR 0.001 0
CIWQS 0.001 0
CERS 0.001 0
NON-CASE INFO 0.001 0
OTHER OIL GAS 0.001 0
PROD WATER PONDS 0.001 0
SAMPLING POINT 0.001 0
WELL STIM PROJ 0.001 0
HWTS Site 0
MINES MRDS 0.001 0
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0
EDR HIST AUTO 0.125 0
EDR HIST CLEANER 0.125 0
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF 0.001 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0
Notes:

Facilities may be listed in more than one database.

The results of the database review are summarized below.

5.1.1 EnviroStor
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Envirostor database lists facilities that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further, including federal Superfund sites, State Response, military facilities, voluntary cleanup, and school sites.

Analysis/Comment:

There is one facility listed within approximately 1.0 mile of the Site:
• Papin Property School Site – Vacaville, 5591 Vanden Road, located approximately 0.98 miles north-northeast of the Site.

Considering the nature of this facility as a proposed school site, the potential for releases from this property that would impact the Site appears low.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
191

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTERVIEWS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 17 5.2 GEOTRACKER
The State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker website was also searched for regulated facilities in the vicinity of the Site. There were no facilities requiring cleanup listed on these databases within approximately 1.3 miles of the Site.

According to GeoTracker, there are several sites with fuel-related cleanups over 1.5 miles southwest and northeast of the Site.

Travis Air Force Base is located approximately 1.5 miles south of the Site. Various cleanup activities are currently underway at this facility for contamination of soil and groundwater from solvents, fuels, radioactive materials, and other contaminants. Impacts to soil and groundwater resulting from historical activities related to this facility are not shown to extend to soil or groundwater at or beneath the Site (California State Water Quality Control Board 2022). 192 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTERVIEWS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 18 6 Interviews
The following table presents a summary of parties contacted for documentation or information pertaining to the Site as part of this assessment:

Name Affiliation Telephone No. Relationship to the
Site
Gates and Associates Park Site Designer (916) 736-8176 City Consultant

6.1 PRESENT OWNERS
A Questionnaire was emailed to the Site designer, Gates, on February 14, 2022.

Gates then sent the questionnaire to the City of Fairfield, the Site owner. The questionnaire was not returned as of the completion of this ESA.

6.2 TITLE RECORDS
No chain-of titles were provided by Gates, and a title records search/review was not requested. Information pertaining to the deeds associated with the Site are discussed in Section 4.6 and included in Appendix G.

6.3 RELATIONSHIP OF PURCHASE PRICE TO FAIR MARKET VALUE NCE has no information regarding the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the Site.

6.4 COMMON KNOWLEDGE OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION Common knowledge or reasonably ascertainable information was not acquired through the Questionnaire or interviews of the Site owner, user, or occupants.

6.5 HISTORICAL SITE USE
Historical record and document research indicate that the Site has predominantly been used for agricultural dry farming since at least 1937, as described in Section

4. 6.6 PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE SITE
Review of the EDR Report, indicates there are no pending, threatened, or past litigation, administrative proceedings, or notices from governmental agencies regarding violations of environmental laws regarding hazardous substances or petroleum products.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
193

MATT GARCIA PARK

INTERVIEWS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 19 6.7 OCCUPANTS
The Site appears to be used for dry farming. Structures or other improvements were not observed during the Site reconnaissance. Occupation of the Site is likely to only occur during typical agricultural operations.

6.8 PAST OWNERS
NCE did not interview the previous owner(s) of the Site. The Questionnaire was reportedly sent to the City of Fairfield by Gates, and has not been returned as of the completion of this ESA.
194 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE RECONNAISSANCE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 20 7 Site Reconnaissance
As noted in Section 1, a reconnaissance of the Site and surrounding vicinity was conducted by NCE staff on February 10, 2022. Doug Gilman, a City of Fairfield Inspector, met NCE staff at the Site prior to accessing the property. NCE staff conducted reconnaissance of the Site unaccompanied to assess the possible presence of RECs.

The weather conditions at the time of the Site visit were sunny with clear skies; there were no weather-induced limitations to NCE’s visit. Photographs taken as part of the Site visit are provided in the Photo Log (Appendix J).

7.1 SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS
The Site consists of mostly flat land used for dry farming. Union Creek flows through one ditch along the western Site boundary. There are two parallel ditches along the southern and southeastern Site boundaries (Photos 1 through 3, Appendix J). A small 5- to 10-yard stockpile of soil is present in the eastern central portion of the Site (Photo 21, Appendix J). The soil comprising this stockpile appears similar to surrounding Site soils.

Vegetation across the Site consists of cultivated grasses ranging in height from 6 inches to 2 feet. An area of taller, brown vegetation is in the eastern and southern portion of the Site and appears to be uncultivated (Photo 5, Appendix J). This area is delineated from the rest of the Site by black mesh fencing (approximately 1 foot in height). Mr. Gilman indicated that the fencing was used to preserve a protected species of salamander.

At the time of the reconnaissance, Kinder Morgan personnel were on-site marking the subsurface location of a fuel transmission line (Photos 3, 7, and 22, Appendix J). The line is beneath the eastern portion of the Site at a depth of 4-to-7 feet; it sits deeper where it transects Union Creek in the southern portion of the Site (Figure 2). Kinder Morgan personnel indicated that the fuel line is 20 inches in diameter and transmits gasoline and jet fuel. A portion of the fuel-line service and maintenance infrastructure is in the northern portion of the Site along the eastern Site boundary.

A small amount of highly weathered, treated wood waste (TWW) is located near the eastern Site boundary in the central portion of the Site (Photo 6, Appendix J). This waste consists of 2 lengths of pressure-treated wood: one is approximately 12 inches by 4 inches by 8 feet and the other is approximately 2 inches by 4 inches by 2 feet.

Land adjacent to the western portion of the Site contains a residence, an agricultural outbuilding in various states of repair, corrals, sheep, and recreational vehicles. Fuel storage was not observed in this area. It is unclear if the structures CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
195

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE RECONNAISSANCE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 21 or residence are currently occupied or utilized. A dirt road adjacent to the southern Site boundary leads to the residence and outbuildings. Vanden Road is adjacent to the eastern Site boundary, beyond which is the UPRR line. Rolling hills are southwest and northeast of the Site. Land to the north and northwest of the Site appears to be used for dry farming.

7.2 CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USAGE
No chemical storage tanks were observed within or in the vicinity of the Site.

7.3 BULK STORAGE TANKS
No bulk storage tanks were observed within or adjacent to the Site.

7.4 SITE WASTE AND WASTEWATER

7.4.1 Solid Waste
NCE did not observe evidence of improper solid waste disposal at the Site.

7.4.2 Sanitary Sewage
Based on observations made during the Site visit, there are no septic systems located within the Site.

7.4.3 Hazardous Waste
No hazardous waste was observed at the Site.

7.5 STAINED SOIL, STAINED PAVEMENT, OF STRESSED VEGETATION No stained soils or pavement were observed in the vicinity of the Site. Green vegetation consistent with the time of year for this area was observed throughout the Site.

7.6 LIQUID DISCHARGES
NCE did not observe any liquid discharges during the Site visit.

7.7 POOLS OF LIQUID
NCE did not observe any standing surface water or pools containing liquids likely to be hazardous substances or petroleum products during the Site visit.

7.8 PITS, PONDS, OR LAGOONS
NCE did not observe any man-made or natural depressions in the ground surface that were likely to hold liquid or sludge containing hazardous substances or petroleum products. The location of Union Creek is depicted on Figure 2. 196 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE RECONNAISSANCE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 22 7.9 WELLS
There are no water supply wells located within the Site. Water supply wells were not observed on land adjacent to the Site during the Site reconnaissance.

7.10 ON-SITE FILL
The primary use of the Site for the last several decades has been agricultural dry farming. As noted in sections 4.2 and 7.1, a small 5- to 10-yard stockpile of soil is located on the eastern central portion of the Site. The origin of this stockpile is not known but may have been generated by activities related to the current agricultural use of the Site.

7.11 DRUMS AND CONTAINERS FOR STORING WASTE
No drums or containers for storing waste were observed at the Site.

7.12 FLOOR DRAINS AND SUMPS
NCE did not identify any floor drains or sumps within the boundaries of the Site.

There are no existing structures at the Site.

7.13 ODORS
NCE did not identify noxious or foul odors suspected to represent an environmental concern in connection with the Site.

7.14 AIR EMISSIONS
NCE did not observe processes or equipment emitting noticeable vapors or fumes at the Site.

7.15 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS)
PCBs can be present in coolants or lubricating oils used in older electrical transformers, hydraulic systems, and other similar equipment. In November 1979, the EPA generally prohibited the domestic manufacture of PCBs in electromagnets, transformers, and heat-transfer and hydraulic equipment. If present, features such as transformers are inspected for obvious leaks and physical evidence such as stains or cracks indicating possible current or past leaks. Transformers were not observed within or near the Site.

7.16 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS
Many building materials such as structural steel fireproofing, acoustic finishes, ceiling texture, ceiling tile, suspended ceiling panels, textured and elastomeric paints, window putty, flexible duct connectors, rubbery pipe insulation tape, building wiring insulation, pipe, boiler, and vessel insulation, interior plaster, and duct insulation commonly contained asbestos until the late 1970s.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
197

MATT GARCIA PARK

SITE RECONNAISSANCE FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 23 There were no structures present at the Site and based on a review of historical documents, it is unlikely that the Site previously contained any buildings. Testing for the presence of ACM was not included in the scope of work for this investigation.

Obvious ACM was not observed by NCE during the Site visit.

7.17 LEAD-CONTAINING MATERIALS

7.17.1 Lead in Drinking Water (LIW)
The major source of LIW is leaching of lead from household plumbing materials or water service lines used to bring water from the main to the home or building. Lead can leach into drinking water through contact with the plumbing, solder, fixtures, and faucets (brass), and fittings.

There were no structures present at the Site and based on a review of historical documents, it is unlikely that the Site previously contained any buildings.

7.17.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP)
There are no existing structures on the Site, and it is unlikely the Site previously contained any buildings.

7.18 RADON
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas. It is released during the natural decay of uranium, radium, and thorium in soil, rock, and groundwater beneath homes and buildings. As uranium naturally breaks down, it releases radon gas, which is a colorless, odorless, radioactive gas. Radon enters homes through direct floors, cracks in concrete walls and floors, floor drains, and sumps. When radon becomes trapped in buildings and concentrations accumulate and increase indoors, exposure to radon can become a concern. Its occurrence in the state of California is influenced primarily by geology.

Based on statistical information maintained within the EPA dated 1993, radon concentrations in Solano County have a low rating, with an average of 2 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). These concentrations are less than or equal to the 2.0 pCi/L action level established by EPA (EPA 1992). Based on this information, it is unlikely that radon represents an environmental concern at the Site.
198 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 24 8 Findings and Recommendations
Based on information provided to NCE by Gates, the review of historical information available, and the Site reconnaissance, the Site has been part of an agricultural dry farming operation since at least 1937. The Site and surrounding areas generally consist of agricultural or undeveloped land with some residences, ranching, and farming. Vanden Road and the UPRR are adjacent and parallel to the eastern Site boundary.

8.1 ON-SITE FINDINGS
This section details RECs that were identified at the Site during this investigation.

RECs include those listed below. Additional details associated with each REC is provided in Sections 8.1.1 through 8.1.5.

1. Potential for elevated lead levels as a result of ADL in near surface soils

2. Potential for elevated arsenic in near surface soils as a result of weed control associated with the UPRR rail alignment

3. Potential for OCPs in near surface soils resulting from commonly used agricultural chemicals

4. Potential for PAHs in near surface soils associated with the UPRR rail alignment

5. Potential for COPCs within the stockpiled soil of unknown origin

8.1.1 Aerially Deposited Lead
Aerially deposited lead (ADL) is lead originating from automotive exhaust gases that settle in soils near roadways. ADL is commonly found in shallow soils (as deep as 3 feet) near roadways that existed during the time that gasoline contained lead.

Leaded gasoline was outlawed in California in 1992. Vanden Road has existed adjacent to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1937. ADL is a constituent of potential concern (COPC) in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary near Vanden Road.

8.1.2 Organochlorine Pesticides
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) are a set of pesticides including DDT that were commonly used in agricultural settings from the 1940s through the mid-1970s, when they were found to be carcinogenic to humans and a threat to wildlife. OCPs are resilient compounds that persist in shallow soil for decades in agricultural areas.

The Site was used as a farm during the time that OCPs were applied to crops. OCPs are COPCs at the Site.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
199

MATT GARCIA PARK

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 25 8.1.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) that have historical presence in lubricants and hydraulic fluids. PAHs are produced when coal, oil, gasoline, and wood are burned. The presence of PAHs in soil is associated with historical railroad activities. The UPRR has existed parallel to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1908 and PAHs are a COPC in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary.

8.1.4 Soil Stockpile of Unknown Origin
A small 5- to 10-yard stockpile is present in the eastern central portion of the Site (Photo 21). Historical Google Earth imagery dating back to May 2017 shows this area of the Site was not cultivated, and vehicular work was present in the area.

Two small stockpiles appear in Google Earth images beginning after this time.

Stockpiles of unknown origin can contain COPCs generated from on-site and off-site activities including fuels, solvents, lubricants, and heavy metals.

8.2 ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF CONCERN
This section details RECs that were identified at the Site.

8.2.1 Underground Fuel Transmission Line
A Kinder Morgan underground fuel transmission line with a diameter of 20 inches is beneath the Site along its eastern boundary (Figure 2). According to Kinder Morgan personnel, the depth of this facility ranges from 4 to 7 feet and is deeper where the line crosses under Union Creek in the southern portion of the Site.

Work performed when constructing Matt Garcia Community Park should occur with knowledge of the location and depth of this sensitive infrastructure.

8.2.2 Treated Wood Waste
A small amount of highly weathered TWW is located near the eastern Site boundary in the central portion of the Site. Historical wood-treating practices included the use of hazardous chemicals including pentachlorophenol, chromium (including hexavalent chromium), and arsenic. Any leaching of COPCs from this small amount of TWW would be considered de minimis and does not warrant further investigation.

In the state of California, TWW is considered Class 1 Waste as of August 31, 2021, and must be taken to an appropriate facility. Recology Hay Road Landfill accepts disposal of TWW.
200 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 26 8.2.3 Protected Salamander Species
Black mesh fencing delineates a section land in the southeastern portion of the Site, extending from the southern Site boundary north along the eastern Site boundary (Figure 2). Mr. Doug Gilman, a City of Fairfield inspector, indicated that the fencing is in place to shield a protected species of salamander from farming operations on the Site.

NCE recommends the City consult a biologist familiar with local fauna to determine the appropriate steps to ensure continued protection of this species of salamander.

8.3 OFF-SITE FINDINGS
RECs in connection with the Site and originating off-site are identified below.

Arsenic is a toxic heavy metal and is a historical component of weed abatement chemicals. Weed abatement chemicals containing arsenic were commonly used near railroad lines. The UPRR has existed parallel to the eastern Site boundary since at least 1908. Arsenic is a COPC in Site soils near the eastern Site boundary.

8.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, NCE recommends further action be taken to determine the presence and/or absence of COPCs at the Site. These recommended actions are listed below.

1. To evaluate whether ADL, arsenic, or PAHs are present at the Site, conduct shallow soil sampling and analysis activities near the eastern Site boundary.

2. To evaluate whether OCPs are present at the Site, conduct shallow soil sampling and analysis activities across the Site.

3. To evaluate the whether the soil stockpile can be reused at the Site, and/or to evaluate appropriate disposal options, collect and analyze the soil for the presence of metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, SVOCs, and OCPs.

4. Properly dispose of TWW currently located on the Site. The Recology Hay Road Landfill in Vacaville accepts disposal of treated wood waste. Further information is available at DTSC Managing Hazardous Waste website (https://dtsc.ca.gov/toxics-in-products/treated-wood-waste/).

5. To ensure the safety of workers developing and constructing Matt Garcia Community Park and the integrity of the subsurface Kinder Morgan fuel line (Figure 2), clearly and accurately delineate the location and depth of this sensitive infrastructure.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
201

MATT GARCIA PARK

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 27 6. To ensure the proper steps are taken to address the presence of a protected native species of salamander on the Site, consult a biologist who is familiar with local fauna to determine appropriate and necessary actions. 202 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

LIMITATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 28 9 Limitations
Information presented in this report does not confirm the presence or absence of subsurface contamination at the property but indicates whether the possibility of such contamination exists. The professional opinions expressed herein are based on limited data; no other warranty is given or implied by this report. A more extensive assessment, including a surface and/or subsurface investigation and chemical analyses of soil and/or groundwater samples, would provide more definitive information concerning Site-specific conditions. This report is complete and accurate to the extent that cited reports and agency information are complete and accurate.

This report has been prepared in compliance with the ASTM standard entitled “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” E1527-21 as well as the EPA AAI rule.

The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated herein. The conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described herein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services within the constraints imposed by the client. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the contract.

In preparing this report, NCE has relied on certain information provided by federal, state, and local officials and other parties referenced therein, and on information contained in the files of governmental agencies, which were readily available to NCE at the time of this assessment. Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these various sources, NCE did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this site assessment. Observations were made of the Site and of the structures on the Site as indicated in this report. Where access to portions of the Site or to structures on the Site was unavailable or limited, NCE renders no opinion as to the presence of direct or indirect evidence relating to petroleum substances, hazardous substances, or both, in that portion of the Site and structure. In addition, NCE renders no opinion as to the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous material or oil, where direct observation of the ground surface, interior walls, floors, ceiling or a structure is obstructed by objects or materials, including snow, covering on or over these surfaces.

NCE does not represent that the Site referred to herein contains no petroleum or hazardous or toxic substances or other conditions beyond those observed by NCE during the Site reconnaissance.

NCE has produced this document under an agreement between NCE and Gates. All terms and conditions of that agreement are included within this document by CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
203

MATT GARCIA PARK

LIMITATIONS FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 29 reference. Any reliance upon this document, or upon NCE’s performance of services in preparing this document, is conditioned upon the relying party’s acceptance and acknowledgement of the limitations, qualifications, terms, conditions, and indemnities set forth in that agreement, and property ownership/management disclosure limitations, if any. It is not to be relied upon by any party other than Gates, nor used for any purpose other than that specifically stated in our Agreement or within this report’s Introduction Section without NCE’s advance and express written consent, except as noted in the Additional Reliance Section.

Environmental Professional Declaration:

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR § 312.10.

We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. We have developed and performed this Phase I ESA consistent with the AAI guidance and in general conformance with the standard and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. 204 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MATT GARCIA PARK

REFERENCES FAIRFIELD, CA
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT - FINAL MARCH 2022 30 10 References
California Department of Water Resources. 2022 "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Data Viewer". Accessed February 14, 2022. https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels California State Water Quality Control Board. 2022 “GeoTracker.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2022 "EnviroStor." Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/
CGS. 2010. “Fault Activity Map of California (2010).”
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/cadoc::fault-activity-map-of-california-2010 EPA. 1992. “Radon Zones (with State Information).”
https://geopub.epa.gov/Radon/
Thomasson Jr., et al. Geology, Water Resources, and Usable Groundwater Storage Capacity of Part of Solano County, California. 1960.
———. 2005. “All Appropriate Inquiries Rule.” http://www.mccarter.com/EPAs-ALLNRCS. 2019. “Web Soil Survey.” http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

Solano County. 2022. “Solano County Assessor’s Parcel Viewer: Zoning Designations.”
http://assessorparcelviewer.ssolanocounty.net/JSViewer/assessor.html.

U.S. Climate Data. 2021. “Climate Fairfield - California.” https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/Fairfield/california/unitedstates/usca0967 USFWS. 2018. “Wetland Mapper.”
https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html.

USGS. 1992. “Fairfield.” http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/map/ CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
205
Figures
206 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX E Document Path: P:\Active Projects\Gates & Assoc - 1170\1170.01.55 - Fairfield Matt Garcia Park MP\GIS\AGP\User\Project - cvaz1.aprx FIGURE

SOURCE JOB NUMBER DRAWN DATE REVISED APPROVED
Bing Aerial Basemap 1170.01.55 cvaz 1/20/2022 2/28/2022 - Proposed Matt Garcia Park 1 City of Fairfield
Vicinity Map
0 1,000 2,000ft.
1:24,000
¯ Legend
Project area
Contra
Costa
County
Napa
County
Yolo
County
0 20 40
mi.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
207
Document Path: P:\Active Projects\Gates & Assoc - 1170\1170.01.55 - Fairfield Matt Garcia Park MP\GIS\AGP\User\Project - cvaz.aprx FIGURE

SOURCE JOB NUMBER DRAWN DATE REVISED APPROVED
Bing Aerial Basemap; NCE 2022 1170.01.55 cvaz 2/14/2022 3/1/2022 gfasiano 2 Proposed Matt Garcia Park
City of Fairfield
Project Detail Map
0 200 400ft.
1 in. = 400 ft.
¯
&
& &
&
&
& &
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
& &
& &
& &
&
&
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
14 15
16 21
22 Project site
20" Kinder Morgan fuel line
Salamander fencing
Approx. Location of soil stockpile
Approx. Location of treated wood debris
Photo locations
Approx. Location of aboveground Kinder Morgan Facility
Union Pacific Railroad
12 13
17 20 19
18 Residential and
Agriculture
outbuildings
&
&
208 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Appendix A

RADIUS MAP REPORT
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
209

FORM-LBB-KKT
The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
Inquiry Number: 6827807.2s
January 21, 2022
210 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 12
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-11
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6827807.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
211

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

SEE LAT/LON
VACAVILLE, CA 95687

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 38.3063890 - 38ˆ 18’ 23.00’’
Longitude (West): 121.9493670 - 121ˆ 56’ 57.72’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
UTM X (Meters): 591861.2
UTM Y (Meters): 4240126.0
Elevation: 92 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 12021597 ELMIRA, CA
Version Date: 2018

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140606
Source: USDA
212 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.2s Page 2
1 PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOO 5591 VANDEN ROAD ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 5194, 0.984, NNE

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:

SEE LAT/LON
VACAVILLE, CA 95687
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
213

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
214 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE State Response Sites
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Active UST Facilities
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
215

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database
SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites

CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing
HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
DEED Deed Restriction Listing
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information

EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
216 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan
Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List
DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data

ICE ICE
HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
UIC UIC Listing

UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System
WIP Well Investigation Program Case List

MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)

PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System

CERS CERS

NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)

OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)

PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)

SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
217

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2021 has revealed that there is 1 ENVIROSTOR site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOO 5591 VANDEN ROAD NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.984 mi.) 1 9 Facility Id: 60000127
Status: No Action Required
218 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6827807.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records.

Site Name Database(s) ____________ ____________
FORMER RR RIGHT-OF-WAY (VANDEN RD. ENVIROSTOR, VCP
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
219
EDR Inc.
220 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
EDR Inc.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
221

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6827807.2s Page 4
222 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CPS-SLIC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CERS HAZ WASTE 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PFAS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
AQUEOUS FOAM TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HIST UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CERS TANKS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TC6827807.2s Page 5
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
223

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted CA FID UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DEED 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CHMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
LDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MCS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC6827807.2s Page 6
224 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Cortese 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CUPA Listings 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
EMI 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ENF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HAZNET 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST CORTESE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PEST LIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC GEO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
WDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MILITARY PRIV SITES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROJECT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WDR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CIWQS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NON-CASE INFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
OTHER OIL GAS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROD WATER PONDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SAMPLING POINT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WELL STIM PROJ 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HWTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MINES MRDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
TC6827807.2s Page 7
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
225

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES:

TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6827807.2s Page 8
226 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Future Due Date: Not reported
Future Document Type: Not reported
Future Sub Area Name: Not reported
Future Area Name: Not reported
Comments: Not reported
Completed Date: 07/07/2005
Completed Document Type: Phase 1
Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported
Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Comments: Not reported
Completed Date: 07/08/2005
Completed Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo
Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported
Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Completed Info:

Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number
Alias Name: 60000127
Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code)
Alias Name: 104481
Alias Type: Alternate Name
Alias Name: TRAVIS USD-PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE
Potential Description: NMA
Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants found
Past Use: NONE
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
Longitude: -121.9475
Latitude: 38.32131
Funding: School District
Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Special Program: Not reported
Senate: 03
Assembly: 11
Division Branch: Northern California Schools & Santa Susana Supervisor: Shahir Haddad
Program Manager: Angela Garcia
Lead Agency: SMBRP
Regulatory Agencies: SMBRP
NPL: NO
Acres: 30
Site Type Detailed: School
Site Type: School Investigation
Site Code: 104481
Status Date: 07/07/2005
Status: No Action Required
Facility ID: 60000127
City,State,Zip: SOLANO COUNTY, CA 95687
Address: 5591 VANDEN ROAD
Name: PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE
ENVIROSTOR:
5194 ft.

0.984 mi.

Relative:

Higher
Actual:
94 ft.
1/2-1 SOLANO COUNTY, CA 95687
NNE 5591 VANDEN ROAD SCH N/A
1 PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE ENVIROSTOR S118757069
TC6827807.2s Page 9
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
227
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Comments: Not reported
Completed Date: 07/07/2005
Completed Document Type: Phase 1
Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported
Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Comments: Not reported
Completed Date: 07/08/2005
Completed Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo
Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported
Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Completed Info:

Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number
Alias Name: 60000127
Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code)
Alias Name: 104481
Alias Type: Alternate Name
Alias Name: TRAVIS USD-PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE
Potential Description: NMA
Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants found
Past Use: NONE
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
Longitude: -121.9475
Latitude: 38.32131
Funding: School District
Restricted Use: NO
Status Date: 07/07/2005
Status: No Action Required
Special Program Status: Not reported
Senate: 03
Assembly: 11
Site Code: 104481
Division Branch: Northern California Schools & Santa Susana Supervisor: Shahir Haddad
Project Manager: Angela Garcia
Lead Agency Description: DTSC - Site Cleanup Program
Lead Agency: SMBRP
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SMBRP
National Priorities List: NO
Acres: 30
Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED
Site Type Detail: School
Site Type: School Investigation
Facility ID: 60000127
City,State,Zip: SOLANO COUNTY, CA 95687
Address: 5591 VANDEN ROAD
Name: PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE
SCH:

Schedule Revised Date: Not reported
Schedule Due Date: Not reported
Schedule Document Type: Not reported
Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported
Schedule Area Name: Not reported
PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE (Continued) S118757069
TC6827807.2s Page 10
228 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Schedule Revised Date: Not reported
Schedule Due Date: Not reported
Schedule Document Type: Not reported
Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported
Schedule Area Name: Not reported
Future Due Date: Not reported
Future Document Type: Not reported
Future Sub Area Name: Not reported
Future Area Name: Not reported
PAPIN PROPERTY SCHOOL SITE (Continued) S118757069
TC6827807.2s Page 11
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
229

ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)Count: 1 records.FAIRFIELD S123785063 FORMER RR RIGHT-OF-WAY (VANDEN RD. VANDEN ROAD 94533 ENVIROSTOR, VCP TC6827807.2s Page 12
230 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.

Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:

EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246
EPA Region 10
Telephone 206-553-8665
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
231
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4267
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.

Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8704
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC6827807.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
232 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
233
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties.

Date of Government Version: 07/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: 843-820-7326
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
234 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: State Response Sites
Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity.

These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database
The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System
Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites.

Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: 916-341-6320
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
TC6827807.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
235
LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties.

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List
Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties.

Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties.

Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation
Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
236 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: see region list
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report
Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.

Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties.

Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-7439
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.

Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
237
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 415-972-3372
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6271
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.

Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.

Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-6597
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.

Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-8677
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER)
Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
238 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 47
Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6827807.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
239
SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 7: SLIC List
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.

Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 202-646-5797
Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Military ust sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
240 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders.

Date of Government Version: 08/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-327-7844
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Active UST Facilities
Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: SWRCB
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-327-5092
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: 415-972-3368
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6137
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
241
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-6136
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-9424
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).

Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-7591
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
242 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.

Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7365
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.

Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1102
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing
A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process.

Date of Government Version: 09/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-323-7905
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.

Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.

Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-2777
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database
Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
243
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4448
Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycler Database
A listing of recycling facilities in California.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
A listing of registered waste tire haulers.

Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 12
Source: Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6422
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-8245
Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: 415-947-4219
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
244 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database
The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.

Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SCH: School Property Evaluation Program
This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose.

Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-6504
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE
List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: CalEPA
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
245
Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4364
Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AQUEOUS FOAM: Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Airports shown on this list are those believed to use Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139). This list was created by SWRCB using information available from the FAA. Location points shown are from the latitude and longitude listed on the FAA airport master record.

Date of Government Version: 12/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5455
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained.

The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data.

Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6827807.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
246 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database
The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data.

Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Local Land Records
LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing
A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder.

Date of Government Version: 08/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.

CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEED: Deed Restriction Listing
TC6827807.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
247
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: DTSC and SWRCB
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.

Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202-366-4555
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills).

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Office of Emergency Services
Telephone: 916-845-8400
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
248 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.

Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: 202-528-4285
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
249
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 615-532-8599
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-1917
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 617-520-3000
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.

Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-4044
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-5521
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
250 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0250
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4203
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-416-0223
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-8600
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.

Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4104
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6827807.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
251
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.

Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0500
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.

Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301-415-7169
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
252 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-8719
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.

Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-0517
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-343-9775
Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
253
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.

Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: 202-208-3710
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.

Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-3559
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
254 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 505-845-0011
Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.

Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8787
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: 703-305-6451
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.

Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information.

Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
255
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: 202-693-9424
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.

Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS.

Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed.

Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: 202-208-2609
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).

Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: EPA
Telephone: (415) 947-8000
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2280
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
256 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: 703-704-1564
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-0527
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-385-6164
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan
Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 916-255-2118
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).

Date of Government Version: 09/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing
list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department
Telephone: 925-454-2361
Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes:
power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
257
Date of Government Version: 08/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-327-4498
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 08/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Telephone: 909-396-3211
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.

Date of Government Version: 08/24/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/25/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EMI: Emissions Inventory Data
Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Air Resources Board
Telephone: 916-322-2990
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ENF: Enforcement Action Listing
A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter.

Date of Government Version: 04/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information
Date of Government Version: 10/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-3628
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6066
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-28

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
258 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data
Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-255-1136
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICE: ICE
Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control
Telephone: 877-786-9427
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency.

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number.

Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-440-7145
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Site Location Listing
A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-322-1080
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-29

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
259
MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing
The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters.

Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-558-1784
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing
A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater.

Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Telephone: 916-445-4038
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PROC: Certified Processors Database
A listing of certified processors.

Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records
Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency.

Date of Government Version: 03/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-3846
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UIC: UIC Listing
A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database.

Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Deaprtment of Conservation
Telephone: 916-445-2408
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-30

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
260 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resource Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission.

Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region
Telephone: 559-445-5577
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDS: Waste Discharge System
Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements.

Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5227
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List
Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area.

Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board
Telephone: 213-576-6726
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-31

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
261
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5810
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System
The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-794-4977
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data
The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California.

These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Non-Case Information sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites
TC6827807.2s Page GR-32

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
262 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.

Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System
DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility.

Date of Government Version: 07/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-324-2444
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-6533
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
TC6827807.2s Page GR-33

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
263
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2497
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
TC6827807.2s Page GR-34

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
264 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.

Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013
Number of Days to Update: 182
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

COUNTY RECORDS
ALAMEDA COUNTY:

CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites
A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs).

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county.

Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AMADOR COUNTY:

CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Amador County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-223-6439
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BUTTE COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-35

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
265
CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 106
Source: Public Health Department
Telephone: 530-538-7149
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CALVERAS COUNTY:

CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa Facility Listing
Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Calveras County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-754-6399
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COLUSA COUNTY:

CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Health & Human Services
Telephone: 530-458-0396
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY:

SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List
List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs.

Date of Government Version: 10/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department
Telephone: 925-646-2286
Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEL NORTE COUNTY:

CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 707-465-0426
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EL DORADO COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-36

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
266 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FRESNO COUNTY:

CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List
Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Dept. of Community Health
Telephone: 559-445-3271
Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
GLENN COUNTY:

CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District
Telephone: 830-934-6500
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:

CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
IMPERIAL COUNTY:

CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: San Diego Border Field Office
Telephone: 760-339-2777
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INYO COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-37

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
267
CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 760-878-0238
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
KERN COUNTY:

CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Kern County Public Health
Telephone: 661-321-3000
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
KINGS COUNTY:

CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Kings County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 559-584-1411
Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAKE COUNTY:

CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Lake County Environmental Health
Telephone: 707-263-1164
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LASSEN COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-38

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
268 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Lassen County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-251-8528
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES COUNTY:

AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009
Number of Days to Update: 206
Source: N/A
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List
Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites.

Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-3517
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County.

Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: La County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 818-458-5185
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills
Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Engineering & Construction Division
Telephone: 213-473-7869
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-39

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
269
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills
This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-6973
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List
Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint.

Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Community Health Services
Telephone: 323-890-7806
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department
Telephone: 310-524-2236
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach.

Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department
Telephone: 562-570-2563
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6827807.2s Page GR-40

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
270 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance.

Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: City of Torrance Fire Department
Telephone: 310-618-2973
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MADERA COUNTY:

CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Madera County Environmental Health
Telephone: 559-675-7823
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MARIN COUNTY:

UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites
Currently permitted USTs in Marin County.

Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Public Works Department Waste Management
Telephone: 415-473-6647
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MENDOCINO COUNTY:

UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database
A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County.

Date of Government Version: 09/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 707-463-4466
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MERCED COUNTY:

CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Merced County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-381-1094
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONO COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-41

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
271
CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA Facility List
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Mono County Health Department
Telephone: 760-932-5580
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONTEREY COUNTY:

CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division.

Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Monterey County Health Department
Telephone: 831-796-1297
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NAPA COUNTY:

LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NEVADA COUNTY:

CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Community Development Agency
Telephone: 530-265-1467
Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ORANGE COUNTY:

IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups
Petroleum and non-petroleum spills.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-42

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
272 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST).

Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PLACER COUNTY:

MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities
List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites.

Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Placer County Health and Human Services
Telephone: 530-745-2363
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PLUMAS COUNTY:

CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List
Plumas County CUPA Program facilities.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Plumas County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-283-6355
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:

LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6827807.2s Page GR-43

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
273
UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List
Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List
List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.

Date of Government Version: 06/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators.

Date of Government Version: 08/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN BENITO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: San Benito County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY:

PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits
This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers.

Date of Government Version: 08/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-44

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
274 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.)
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division
Telephone: 619-338-2268
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities
San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 619-338-2209
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing
A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases.

Date of Government Version: 07/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 858-505-6874
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing
The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program.

Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-45

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
275
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY:

UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST
A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county.

Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Health Department
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN MATEO COUNTY:

BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory
List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-46

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
276 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division.

Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-686-8167
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SANTA CLARA COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-1973
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county.

Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Telephone: 408-265-2600
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing
A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county.

Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-3417
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities
Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites.

Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: City of San Jose Fire Department
Telephone: 408-535-7694
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health
Telephone: 831-464-2761
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SHASTA COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-47

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
277
CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SOLANO COUNTY:

LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SONOMA COUNTY:

CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 707-565-6565
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
STANISLAUS COUNTY:

CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SUTTER COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-48

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
278 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county.

Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/25/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 530-822-7500
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TEHAMA COUNTY:

CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRINITY COUNTY:

CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 760-352-0381
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TULARE COUNTY:

CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa program facilities
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:

CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: Divison of Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-533-5633
Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VENTURA COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-49

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
279
BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites.

Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List
To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County.

Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List
Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List.

Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
YOLO COUNTY:

UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county.

Date of Government Version: 09/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Yolo County Department of Health
Telephone: 530-666-8646
Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
YUBA COUNTY:

TC6827807.2s Page GR-50

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
280 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing for Yuba County.

Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department
Telephone: 530-749-7523
Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies

OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.

CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility.

Date of Government Version: 07/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375
Last EDR Contact: 11/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6827807.2s Page GR-51

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
281
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.

Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states.

Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.

Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6827807.2s Page GR-52

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
282 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC6827807.2s Page GR-53

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
283
TC6827807.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

2. Groundwater flow velocity.

1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.

EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in Version Date: 2018
Target Property Map: 12021597 ELMIRA, CA

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Elevation: 92 ft. above sea level
UTM Y (Meters): 4240126.0
UTM X (Meters): 591861.2
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
Longitude (West): 121.949367 - 121ˆ 56’ 57.72’’
Latitude (North): 38.306389 - 38ˆ 18’ 23.00’’

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
VACAVILLE, CA 95687

SEE LAT/LON

FAIRFIELD - MATT GARCIA PARK

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM ®
284 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft) TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles ✩Target Property Elevation: 92 ft.

North South
West East 959292919291888583837882 99 104 129 137101 105 117 128 123 118 132 160 143 168120949290 9999 102 142112 1039791 General Topographic Gradient: General East

TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
285
TC6827807.2s Page A-3
Not Reported

LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION

MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

Status: Not found
Search Radius: 1.25 miles
Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:
* ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
ELMIRA YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
06095C0295E FEMA FIRM Flood data
06095C0283E FEMA FIRM Flood data
06095C0279E FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
06095C0287E FEMA FIRM Flood data
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type

FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).

Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
286 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Pliocene
Code: Tp (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.

Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
287
EDR Inc.
12 3
4 4
5 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
288 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-6
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 50 inches 79 inches clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 20 inches 50 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 20 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.

Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: silty clay loam
Soil Component Name: Capay
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
289
TC6827807.2s Page A-7
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.

Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: Diablo
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 44 inches 59 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 27 inches 44 inches loam Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 27 inches loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: loam
Soil Component Name: Yolo
Soil Map ID: 2
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
290 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-8
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.

Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: Diablo
Soil Map ID: 4
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
Silt-Clay
bedrock
3 40 inches 44 inches weathered
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 29 inches 40 inches silty clay Silt-Clay
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 29 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
291
TC6827807.2s Page A-9
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.

Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Soil Component Name: San Ysidro
Soil Map ID: 5
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
Silt-Clay
bedrock
3 40 inches 44 inches weathered
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 25 inches 40 inches silty clay Silt-Clay
Max: Min:

Min:

Not reported Max:

Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 25 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
292 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-10

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
State Database 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
Federal USGS 1.000

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
Silt-Clay
clay loam
sandy loam to
4 53 inches 68 inches stratified
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
3 27 inches 53 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 14 inches 27 inches clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 14 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
293
TC6827807.2s Page A-11
3 CAOG14000009035 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE
2 CAOG14000008817 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW
1 CAOG14000008820 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE

STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
6 CADPR0000003720 1/2 - 1 Mile SW
5 CADWR9000038872 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE
4 CADPR0000002020 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE
3 CADPR0000005274 1/4 - 1/2 Mile East
A1 CADWR9000038839 1/4 - 1/2 Mile South

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

No PWS System Found

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
A2 USGS40000187712 1/4 - 1/2 Mile South

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
294 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
EDR Inc.
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
2 0 0 1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 2 0
1 2
1 0
2 0
1 2 0
120
120
120
1 6 0
1 2 0
1 120
2 0
1 2 0
120
8 0
120
1 60
8 0
2 4 0
2 0 0
1 20 1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
8 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
8 0
8 0
8 0 8 0
8 0 8 0
80 80
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
CA
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
295
TC6827807.2s Page A-13
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=97553&store_num=
Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_ Other Name: 97553 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Well ID: 97553 Well Type: UNK
4 ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADPR0000002020
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=97552&store_num=
Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_ Other Name: 97552 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Well ID: 97552 Well Type: UNK
3 East
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADPR0000005274
Well Hole Depth Units: ft
Well Depth Units: ft Well Hole Depth: 60
Construction Date: 19510817 Well Depth: 60
Formation Type: Not Reported Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: Central Valley aquifer system
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported Description: Not Reported HUC: 18050001
Monitor Location: 005N001W02N001M Type: Well
Organization Name: USGS California Water Science Center Organization ID: USGS-CA
A2
South
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
FED USGS USGS40000187712
Well Depth: 0 Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported
Well Use: Stockwatering Well Type: Unknown
Well Name: Not Reported Basin Name: Suisun-Fairfield Valley State Well #: 05N01W02N001M Station ID: 7037
A1
South
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR9000038839
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®
296 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-14
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=97356&store_num=
Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_ Other Name: 97356 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Well ID: 97356 Well Type: UNK
6 SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADPR0000003720
Well Depth: 81 Well Completion Rpt #: 308
Well Use: Residential Well Type: Unknown
Well Name: Not Reported Basin Name: Solano
State Well #: 05N01W02B001M Station ID: 7035
5 NNE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR9000038872
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
297
TC6827807.2s Page A-15
Spud Date: 10/03/1980
Confidential Well: N Directionally Drilled: N
Area Name: Any Area GIS Source: hud
Lease Name: A.F.B. Field Name: Any Field
Well Status: Plugged Well Type: Dry Hole
API #: 0409520444 Well #: 2
3 ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
OIL_GAS CAOG14000009035
Spud Date: 05/23/1935
Confidential Well: N Directionally Drilled: N
Area Name: Any Area GIS Source: hud
Lease Name: Noonan Field Name: Any Field
Well Status: Plugged Well Type: Dry Hole
API #: 0409500343 Well #: 1
2 SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
OIL_GAS CAOG14000008817
Spud Date: 04/30/1955
Confidential Well: N Directionally Drilled: N
Area Name: Any Area GIS Source: hud
Lease Name: Western Gulf Field Name: Any Field
Well Status: Plugged Well Type: Dry Hole
API #: 0409500346 Well #: 1
1 SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
OIL_GAS CAOG14000008820
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®
298 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
TC6827807.2s Page A-16
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 1st Floor 2.529 pCi/L 71% 29% 0%
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Number of sites tested: 7
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 95687
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.

Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for SOLANO County: 3
95687 29 2
______ ________ ________
Zipcode Num Tests > 4 pCi/L
Radon Test Results
State Database: CA Radon

AREA RADON INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
299

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection.

Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information System R
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management.

TC6827807.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
300 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program
State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5577
The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects.

Water Well Database
Source: Department of Water Resources
Telephone: 916-651-9648
California Drinking Water Quality Database
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-324-2319
The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information.

California Oil and Gas Well Locations
Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779
Oil and Gas well locations in the state.

California Earthquake Fault Lines
Source: California Division of Mines and Geology
The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

RADON
State Database: CA Radon
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-210-8558
Radon Database for California
TC6827807.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
301
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-356-4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.

The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-356-4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels.

OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC6827807.2s Page PSGR-3

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
302 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Appendix B

HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
303
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
January 21, 2022
6827807.4
304 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:

P.O.#
Project:

Maps Provided:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
Coordinates:

Latitude:

Longitude:

UTM Zone:

UTM X Meters:

UTM Y Meters:

Elevation:

Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:
2018
2015
2012
1980
1973
1968
1953
1917
1908
01/21/22
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park NCE
See Lat/Lon 8795 Folsom Boulevard
Vacaville, CA 95687 Sacramento, CA 95826
6827807.4 Matthew Kinney
EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by NCE were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. 1170.01.55 38.306389 38° 18' 23" North
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park -121.949367 -121° 56' 58" West Zone 10 North
591858.88
4240332.49

91.16' above sea level
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6827807 4 2
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
305
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
2018 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
2015 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
2012 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
1980 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
6827807 4 3
306 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1973 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1973
1968 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1968
1953 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1949
1917 Source Sheets
Elmira

7.5-minute, 31680
6827807 4 4
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
307
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1908 Source Sheets
Vacaville
15-minute, 62500
6827807 4 5
308 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2018
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 2018, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 6
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
309
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2015
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 2015, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 7
310 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2012
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 2012, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 8
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
311
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1980
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 1980, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 9
312 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1973
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 1973, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 10
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
313
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1968
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 1968, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 11
314 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1953
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 1953, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 12
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
315
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1917
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Elmira, 1917, 7.5-minute
6827807 4 13
316 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1908
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
NCE
TP, Vacaville, 1908, 15-minute
6827807 4 14
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
317
Appendix C

HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
318 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
Inquiry Number:

January 21, 2022
6827807.11
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
319
2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1993 1"=500' Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993 USGS/DOQQ 1984 1"=500' Flight Date: June 08, 1984 USDA
1974 1"=500' Flight Date: July 18, 1974 USGS
1968 1"=500' Flight Date: May 28, 1968 USGS
1952 1"=500' Flight Date: August 02, 1952 USDA
1937 1"=500' Flight Date: August 25, 1937 USDA
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/21/22
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
Site Name: Client Name:

NCE
See Lat/Lon 8795 Folsom Boulevard
Vacaville, CA 95687 Sacramento, CA 95826
EDR Inquiry # 6827807.11 Contact: Matthew Kinney
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade.

Search Results:

Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
6827807 - 11 page 2
320 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.11
2016
= 500'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
321
6827807.11
2012
= 500'
322 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.11
2009
= 500'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
323
6827807.11
2006
= 500'
324 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.11
1993
= 500'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
325
6827807.11
1984
= 500'
326 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.11
1974
= 500'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
327
6827807.11
1968
= 500'
328 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
6827807.11
1952
= 500'
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
329
6827807.11
1937
= 500'
330 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Appendix D

SANBORN MAPS
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
331
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
January 21, 2022
6827807.3
332 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:

Certification #
PO #
Project
01/21/22
See Lat/Lon
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park NCE
8795 Folsom Boulevard
Vacaville, CA 95687
6827807.3
Sacramento, CA 95826
Matthew Kinney
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by NCE were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated.

B627-4D15-9D3F
1170.01.55

UNMAPPED PROPERTY
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Certification #: B627-4D15-9D3F
NCE (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6827807 3 2
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
333
Appendix E

BUILDING PERMIT REPORT
334 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
Inquiry Number: 6827807.8
January 21, 2022
EDR Building Permit Report
Target Property and Adjoining Properties
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
335

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
About This Report
Executive Summary
Findings
Glossary
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 336 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT
About This Report
The EDR Building Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

Building permit data can be used to identify current and/or former operations and structures/features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks.

ASTM and EPA Requirements
ASTM E 1527-13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7:
“Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property.” ASTM also states that “Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself.”
EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: "§312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records.”
Methodology
EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation’s largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States.

The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description.

Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control “touch points.”
For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352-0050.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
337
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION
A search of building department records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) on behalf of NCE on Jan 21, 2022.

TARGET PROPERTY
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687

SEARCH METHODS
EDR searches available lists for both the Target Property and Surrounding Properties.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
Building permits identified: NO PERMITS IDENTIFIED
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Name: JurisdictionName
Years: Years
Source: Source
Phone: Phone
6827807- 8 Page 1
338 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS SEARCHED
Name: Vacaville
Years: 1989-2021
Source: City of Vacaville, Building Permits, VACAVILLE, CA Phone: (707) 449-5152
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
339

TARGET PROPERTY FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY DETAIL
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
No Permits Found
6827807- 8 Page 2
340 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS

ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address.

No Permits Found
6827807- 8 Page 3
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
341

GLOSSARY
General Building Department concepts
. ICC: The International Code Council. The governing body for the building/development codes used by all jurisdictions who’ve adopted the ICC guidelines. MOST of the US has done this. Canada, Mexico, and other countries use ICC codes books and guides as well. There are a few states who have added guidelines to the ICC codes to better fit their needs. For example, California has added seismic retrofit requirements for most commercial structures.
. Building Department (Permitting Authority, Building Codes, Inspections Department, Building and Inspections): This is the department in a jurisdiction where an owner or contractor goes to obtain permits and inspections for building, tearing down, remodeling, adding to, re-roofing, moving or otherwise making changes to any structure, Residential or Commercial.
. Jurisdiction: This is the geographic area representing the properties over which a Permitting Authority has responsibility.
. GC: General Contractor. Usually the primary contractor hired for any Residential or Commercial construction work.
. Sub: Subordinate contracting companies or subcontractors. Usually a “trades” contractor working for the GC. These contractors generally have an area of expertise in which they are licensed like Plumbing, Electrical, Heating and Air systems, Gas Systems, Pools etc. (called “trades”). . Journeymen: Sub contractors who have their own personal licenses in one or more trades and work for different contracting companies, wherever they are needed or there is work. .
. HVAC (Mechanical, Heating & Air companies): HVAC = Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.

ELEC (Electrical, TempPole, TPole, TPower, Temporary Power, Panel, AMP Change, Power Release):

Electrical permits can be pulled for many reasons. The most common reason is to increase the AMPs of power in an electrical power panel. This requires a permit in almost every jurisdiction. Other commons reason for Electrical permits is to insert a temporary power pole at a new construction site. Construction requires electricity, and in a new development, power has yet to be run to the lot. The temporary power pole is usually the very first permit pulled for new development. The power is released to the home owner when construction is complete and this sometimes takes the form of a Power Release permit or inspection. .
. “Pull” a permit: To obtain and pay for a building permit. . CBO: Chief Building Official
Planning Department: The department in the development process where the building /structural plans are reviewed for their completeness and compliance with building codes . Zoning Department: The department in the development process where the site plans are reviewed for their compliance with the regulations associated with the zoning district in which they are situated. . Zoning District: A pre-determined geographic boundary within a jurisdiction where certain types of structures are permitted / prohibited. Examples are Residential structure, Commercial/Retail structures, Industrial/Manufacturing structures etc. Each zoning district has regulations associated with it like the sizes of the lots, the density of the structures on the lots, the number of parking spaces required for certain types of structures on the lots etc.
.
. PIN (TMS, GIS ID, Parcel#): Property Identification Number and Tax Map System number. . State Card (Business license): A license card issued to a contractor to conduct business.

Building Inspector (Inspector): The inspector is a building department employee that inspects building construction for compliance to codes. . C.O.: Certificate of Occupancy. This is the end of the construction process and designates that the owners now have permission to occupy a structure after its building is complete. Sometimes also referred to as a Certificate of Compliance.
342 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

GLOSSARY
Permit Content Definitions
. Permit Number: The alphanumerical designation assigned to a permit for tracking within the building department system. Sometimes the permit number gives clues to its role, e.g. a "PL" prefix may designate a plumbing permit.
. Description: A field on the permit form that allows the building department to give a brief description of the work being done. More often than not, this is the most important field for EP’s to find clues to the prior use (s) of the property.
. Permit Type: Generally a brief designation of the type of job being done. For example BLDG-RES, BLDGCOM, ELEC, MECH etc.

Sample Building Permit Data
Date: Nov 09, 2000
Permit Type: Bldg -
New Permit Number: 101000000405
Status: Valuation: $1,000,000.00
Contractor Company: OWNER-BUILDER
Contractor Name:

Description: New one store retail (SAV-ON) with drive-thru pharmacy. Certificate of Occupancy.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
343
Appendix F

CITY DIRECTORY REPORT
344 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Fairfield, CA 95687
Inquiry Number: 6827807.5
January 21, 2022
The EDR-City Directory Image Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
345

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 346 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.

EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals.

RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report.

EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Year Target Street Cross Street Source
2017 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
2014 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
2010 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
2005 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
2000 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
1995 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
1992 þ ¨ EDR Digital Archive
1986 þ ¨ Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1981 þ ¨ Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1977 þ ¨ Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1972 ¨ ¨ POLK DIRECTORY CO
1968 ¨ ¨ POLK DIRECTORY CO
1963 ¨ ¨ POLK DIRECTORY CO
6827807- 5 Page 1
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
347
6827807- 5 Page 2
348 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY STREET
See Lat/Lon
Fairfield, CA 95687
Year CD Image Source

VANDEN RD
2017 pg A1 EDR Digital Archive
2014 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive
2010 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive
2005 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive
2000 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive
1995 pg A9 EDR Digital Archive
1992 pg A11 EDR Digital Archive
1986 pg A12 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1981 pg A13 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1977 pg A14 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1972 - POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source
1968 - POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source
1963 - POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source
6827807- 5 Page 3
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
349

FINDINGS

CROSS STREETS
No Cross Streets Identified
6827807- 5 Page 4
350 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
City Directory Images
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
351
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A1
Target Street Cross Street Source
2017
4987 SAVON STORAGE
4999 JEFF RAMIREZ TOWING SERVICE
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT A
5566 VICINO, JOSEPH F
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 CHENOWETH, JAMES
5742 NEUKIRCH, MICHAEL A
5750 ORR, TIM T
6051 ALLEN, GREGORY L
6056 SCOTT, ALICE M
6057 MOSER, MICHAEL W
6062 ZAJDEL, SHANNA M
6063 WRIGHT, LOUIS W
6068 WARY, WILLIAM F
6069 BLITCH, DAVID E
6074 LOCKHART, JERRELLE L
6075 COHEN, LYNN M
6080 CRUMPLER, JOHNIE L
6093 HERBERT, STANLEY R
6098 LOWE, KIM D
6099 LAUFER, ERIC C
6104 HAMMONDS, CLAUDINE M
6105 BACOM, STEVEN R
6111 GONZALES, JESSICA
6116 GREAVES, VINCENT L
6122 JONES, DIVINA S
6128 FLESHMAN, TIMOTHY J
6134 SISSON, TIMOTHY B
6176 TAYLOR, JOY
6182 RUBIN, NICHOLAS
6188 MOODY, AISHA S
6194 KAUR, ROUMINDER
6200 JEWELL, ANTHONY T
6206 STJOHN, CODY
6212 HARRISON, DEAN C
6218 SHOOK, THERESE S
6224 RAWLINS, KEVIN S
6230 MORRIS, DAVID J
6242 KAUFMAN, GORDON D
6248 AHCHING, MARILYN
6254 LANDEROS, MARIO
6260 FLORES, CRAIG A
6261 VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
352 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A2
Target Street Cross Street Source
2014
4987 SAV ON STORAGE
4999 RAMIREZ TOWING
5001 MIKES ROAD SERVICE
5424 CARNES, TIMOTHY J
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT A
5566 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 CHENOWETH, JAMES
5742 TABAYOYON, ADAM
5750 ORR, TIMOTHY T
6051 BASSETT, KATHERYN A
6056 SCOTT, BROOKS A
6057 RACHEL, JEFFREY G
6062 YEASTED, ROBERT E
6063 WRIGHT, LOUIS W
6068 WARY, WILLIAM F
6069 BLITCH, DAVID E
6074 LOCKHART, JERRELLE L
6075 COHEN, LYNN M
6080 CRUMPLER, JOHNIE L
6081 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6093 HARTMANN, MATTHEW D
6098 LOWE, KIM D
6099 LAUFER, ERIC C
6104 HAMMONDS, CLAUDINE M
6105 BACOM, STEVEN R
6110 BENSON, ERIC J
6111 CASTILLO, E
6116 GREAVES, VINCENT L
6122 STENZEL, BETTY J
6128 SALGUERO, JIMMY S
6134 SISSON, TIMOTHY L
6164 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6170 GIBBS, MEGAN E
6176 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6182 GIPSON, BECKILYNN
6188 RAMIREZ, DECIDERIO T
6194 BLANCO, MAHALA
6200 JEWELL, ANTHONY T
6206 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6212 HARRISON, DEAN C
6218 SHOOK, THERESE S
6224 RAWLINS, JESSICA N
6230 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6236 GALLELO, MIKE
6242 KAUFMAN, VINCENT D
6248 DEEB, MAUREEN D
6254 BANTIQUE, MARC R
6260 FLORES, CRAIG A
6261 VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
353
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A3
Target Street Cross Street Source
2010
4987 SAVON STORAGE
4999 J RAMIREZ TOWING SVC

RAMIREZ GROUP
5001 MIKES ROAD SVC
5424 LAPLANT, LINDA A
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT A
5566 RAMOS, JESUS
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 HURTADO, MATTHEW
5742 NEUKIRK, MICHAEL A
5750 ORR, B
5790 LANHAM, ABRIL
6051 BASSETT, KATHERYN A
6056 SKALLET, MATTHEW R
6057 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6062 YEASTED, ROBERT E
6063 WRIGHT, LOUIS W
6068 CALHOUN, TOMMIE L
6069 BLITCH, DAVID E
6074 LOCKHART, JERRELLE L
6075 COHEN, LYNN M
6080 CRUMPLER, JOHNIE L
6081 OPALEWSKI, SCOTT D
6093 HALL, CRISTEE
6098 LOWE, KIM D
6099 PILACZYNSKI, CHRISTOPHER J
6104 HAMMONDS, SHARON D
6110 CONYERS, MARVIN R
6111 FIGUEIRA, MARIA
6116 GREAVES, VINCENT J
6122 STENZEL, DEAN L
6128 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6134 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6164 FERNANDEZ, JESSIE J
6170 BROOKS, CHARLENE
6176 HOWARD, GARY B
6182 GIPSON, BECKILYNN
6188 ZENZICK, ALEXANDER J
6194 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6200 JEWELL, ANTHONY T
6206 BRUMMER, DAN
6212 HARRISON, DEAN C
6218 MIRANDA, BETH
6224 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6230 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6236 GALLELO, MARK P
6242 KAUFMAN, GALA
6248 MARSH, MARILYN J
6254 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6260 FLORES, CRAIG A
354 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
(Cont'd)
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A4
Target Street Cross Street Source
2010
6261 JEAN CALLISON ELEMENTARY
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
355
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A5
Target Street Cross Street Source
2005
4921 TASMAN ROOFING INC
4987 SAV ON STORAGE
4999 THE RAMIREZ GROUP
5214 NOONAN, KATHLEEN A
5424 ANNETTE TIFFANY CHAMPAGNE DESIGN

STINE, ESTAL G
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT G
5566 RAMOS, JESUS
5591 PAPIN, EVON A
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5714 TAYLOR, JACOB J
5742 NEUKIRK, MICHAEL A
5750 ORR, BILL J
5790 LANHAM, ABRIL N
5826 SHUBIN, MIKE J
6056 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6057 RACHEL, JEFFREY G
6062 YEASTED, ROBERT E
6063 LOUIS W WRIGHT

WRIGHT, LOUIS W
6068 CALHOUN, TOMMIE L
6069 CAMPBELL, DONN C
6074 LOCKHART, JERRELLE
6075 COHEN, LYNN M
6080 CRUMPLER, JOHNIE L
6081 OPALEWSKI, SCOTT D

SCOTTY D ENTERTAINMENT
6093 HALL, CRISTEE
6098 LOWE, KIM D
6099 VITE, LEONARD
6104 HAMMONDS, SHARON D
6110 CONYERS, MARVIN R
6111 GARCIA, PEDRO E
6116 GREAVES, VINCENT J

WORLD TRAVEL ASSOCIATES
6122 STENZEL, DEAN L
6128 REUTOV, ALEKSEY
6134 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6164 EDOKPAYI, BENJAMIN O
6170 GRANT, MARY
6176 ANNS DAY CARE

HOWARD, GARY B
6182 GIPSON, BECKILYNN
6194 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6200 JEWELL, ANTHONY T
6206 FOX, BRADLEY
6212 HARRISON, DEAN C
6218 NAVAREC, MIKE D
6224 SCHALL, ROBERT J
356 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
(Cont'd)
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A6
Target Street Cross Street Source
2005
6230 CORNETT, NANCY
6236 GALLELO, MARK P
6242 KAUFMAN, GORDON D
6248 BETANCUR, MARIA
6254 MCPHAIL, SUSAN
6260 LEARY, TIMOTHY J
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
357
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A7
Target Street Cross Street Source
2000
5001 MIKES ROAD SERVICE

PETTENGILL, JOHN E
5007 BOWMANS TOWING
5011 TRAVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 2751 DE RONDE DR
5424 STINE, ESTAL G
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT G
5566 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5591 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5596 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5714 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
5742 NEUKIRCH, JOHN S
5750 ORR, BILL J
5790 LANHAM, ABRIL
5826 SHUBIN, M M
6051 WEATHERMAN, SHANNON
6056 VALENCIA, M T
6057 RACHEL, JEFFREY G
6062 RINCK, RENEE Y
6063 WRIGHT, JOANNE
6068 CALHOUN, TOMMIE L
6069 BLITCH, DAVID E
6074 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6075 COHEN, LYNN M
6080 CRUMPLER, JOHNIE L
6081 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6093 RALPH, NEVILLE J
6098 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6099 NEWMEYER, JOSEPH R
6104 FULLER, T
6105 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6110 CONYERS, MARVIN R
6111 GARCIA, DOROTHY E
6116 GREAVES, VINCENT J
6122 STENZEL, DEAN L
6128 KHAN, GUL N
6134 SISSON, TIMOTHY L
6164 MACKBEE, DEBRAK E
6170 MARTINEQ, TONY
6176 HOWARD, GARY B
6182 GIPSON, BECKI
6188 IBARRA, JAVIER
6194 STANK, MARK A
6200 JEWELL, ANTHONY T
6206 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
6212 HILL, CYNTHIA E
6218 FILOGRASSO, HERBERT F
6224 SCHALL, ROBERT J
6230 RUFF, GREGORY A
358 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
(Cont'd)
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A8
Target Street Cross Street Source
2000
6236 GALLELO, MIKE
6242 KAUFMAN, GORDON D
6248 MARSH, MARILYN
6254 CARBAUGH, LEAH M
6261 JEAN CALLISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOLS
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
359
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A9
Target Street Cross Street Source
1995
4999 ALLCHEVY AUTO PARTS
5005 TLC CUSTOM ENGINEERING
5007 ABC AUTO DISMANTLERS
5011 NORTH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL
5424 STINE, ESTAL G
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT G
5566 LARSON, P
5591 PAPIN, EVON
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 PAPIN, JOHN
5714 STOTLER, CHARLES E

WOODTECH
5742 NEUKIRCH, JOHN S
5750 ORR, BILL J
5772 FOSTER, M H

FOSTERS NURSERY
5790 LANHAM, ABRIL
5826 SHUBIN, M M
6051 HANKS, TIFFANY
6056 ROSZKO, BRIAN C
6057 RACHEL, JEFFREY G
6062 RINCK, RENEE Y
6063 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6068 CALHOUN, TOMMIE L
6069 BLITCH, DAVID E
6074 WASHINGTON, M
6081 MARTIN, ALVIN B
6093 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6098 HILL, CHARLES
6099 POLLARD, SHELTON
6104 HAMMONDS, C M
6105 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6110 HOEY, CYNTHIA M
6116 GREAVES, PAMELA
6122 STENZEL, DEAN L
6128 WONG, M
6134 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6164 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6170 BRIGGS, DONALD
6176 HOWARD, GARY
6182 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6188 IBARRA, JAVIER
6194 TAYLOR, DANIEL F
6200 MCKEOWN, DENNIS
6206 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6212 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6218 FILOGRASSO, HERBERT
6224 SCHALL, ROBERT J
6230 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
6236 GALLELO, MIKE
360 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
(Cont'd)
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A10
Target Street Cross Street Source
1995
6242 KAUFMAN, GORDON D
6248 LEON, VICTOR
6254 POMRENKE, D
6260 LEARY, TIMOTHY J
6261 JEAN CALLISON ELEMENTARY
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
361
-

VANDEN RD
EDR Digital Archive
6827807.5 Page: A11
Target Street Cross Street Source
1992
4921 SIERRA GYPSUM INC
4987 SAV ON STORAGE
4999 ALLCHEVY AUTO PARTS
5005 T L C CUSTOM ENGRG
5007 A B C AUTO DSMNTLRS
5011 NORTH CAMPUS

TRAVIS SC NORTH
5424 STINE, ESTAL G
5436 HEWITT, ROBERT G
5591 PAPIN, EVON
5598 CHEECHOV, NICK S
5709 PAPIN, JOHN
5714 WOODTECH
5750 ORR, BILL J
5772 FOSTER MARSHALL H

FOSTER, M H
5790 LANHAM, ABRIL
5826 SHUBIN, M M
6056 US HOME CORP
6080 US HOME CONSTR OFC
6099 POLLARD, SHELTON
6111 VACAVILLE SC ELEM
6128 CALIFORNIA, CARL
6176 KEITH, JAMES W
6188 IBARRA, JAVIER
6200 MCKEOWN, DENNIS
6218 FILOGRASSO, HERBERT
6236 GALLELO, MIKE
6260 GALLAHER, BRUCE
362 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
-

VANDEN RD
Haines Criss-Cross Directory
6827807.5 Page: A12
Target Street Cross Street Source
1986
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
363
-

VANDEN RD
Haines Criss-Cross Directory
6827807.5 Page: A13
Target Street Cross Street Source
1981
364 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
-

VANDEN RD
Haines Criss-Cross Directory
6827807.5 Page: A14
Target Street Cross Street Source
1977
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
365
Appendix G

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN AND AUL SEARCH
366 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
Inquiry Number: 6827807.7
January 24, 2022
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
367
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
The EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls and institutional controls.

A network of professional, trained researchers, following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to:
• search for parcel information and/or legal description; • search for ownership information;
• research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorders' offices, registries of deeds, county clerks' offices, etc.;
• access a copy of the deed;
• search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument(s) (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed.

Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 368 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION _______________________________

ADDRESS
See Lat/Lon
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
Vacaville, CA 95687

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN
Environmental Lien: Found ¨ Not Found ý
OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULs)
AULs: Found ¨ Not Found ý
6827807.7 Page 1
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
369

RESEARCH SOURCE
Source 1:

Solano Recorder
Solano, CA
370 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E

PROPERTY INFORMATION
Deed 1:

Type of Deed: deed
Title is vested in: City of Fairfield
Title received from: One Lake Holding LLC
Deed Dated 3/21/2016
Deed Recorded: 3/28/2016
Book: NA
Page: na
Volume: na
Instrument: na
Docket: NA
Land Record Comments:

Miscellaneous Comments:

Legal Description: See Exhibit
Legal Current Owner: City of Fairfield
Parcel # / Property Identifier: 0166-020-240
Comments: See Exhibit
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
371
Deed Exhibit 1
372 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
373
374 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
375
376 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
377
378 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
379
380 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
381
Appendix H

PROPERTY TAX MAP REPORT
382 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Fairfield - Matt Garcia Park
See Lat/Lon
Vacaville, CA 95687
Inquiry Number: 6827807.6
January 21, 2022
The EDR Property Tax Map Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
383
EDR Property Tax Map Report
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s EDR Property Tax Map Report is designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential environmental conditions on a target property by understanding property boundaries and other characteristics. The report includes a search of available property tax maps, which include information on boundaries for the target property and neighboring properties, addresses, parcel identification numbers, as well as other data typically used in property location and identification.

NO COVERAGE
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 384 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Appendix I

PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
385
Not returned as of March 1, 2022
386 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
Appendix J

PHOTO LOG
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
387
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
1 Photo 1. View to the southeast along the
southern Site boundary of Union Creek
(February 2022).

Photo 3. View to the northeast of
markings delineating the location of the
Kinder Morgan fuel line (February 2022).

Photo 4. View to the southeast of Vanden
Road and the Union Pacific Railroad line.
(February 2022).

Photo 2. View to the southeast near the
eastern Site boundary of Union Creek flowing
beneath Vanden Road (February 2022).
388 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
2 Photo 6. View of treated wood waste
near the eastern Site boundary (February
2022).

Photo 7. View of Kinder Morgan fuel line
infrastructure near the eastern Site
boundary (February 2022).

Photo 8. View to the southwest along
the eastern Site boundary (February
2022).

Photo 5. View to the west across the Site
from the eastern Site boundary (February
2022).

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
389
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
3 Photo 9. View to the west along the
northern Site boundary(February 2022).

Photo 10. View to the northwest from the
northern Site boundary (February 2022).

Photo 11. View to the south across the Site
from the northern Site boundary (February
2022).

Photo 12. View to the east along the
northern Site boundary from the
northwestern portion of the Site (February
2022).
390 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
4 Photo 23. View to the south along the
eastern Site boundary (February 2022).

Photo 34. View to the west from the western
Site boundary of agricultural structures
(February 2022).

Photo 45. View to the southeast across
the southern portion of the Site
(February 2022).

Photo 56. View to the south across the
southern Site boundary (February 2022).

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Env Site Assessment
391
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
5 Photo 67. View to the north from the
central portion of the Site. (February
2022).

Photo 78. View to the west from the
central portion of the Site (February 2022).

Photo 89. View to the south from the
central portion of the Site (February 2022).

Photo 20. View to the east from the
central portion of the Site (February 2022).
392 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX E
PROPOSED MATT GARCIA PARK PHASE 1 ESA

PHOTO LOG FAIRFIELD, CA

DOCUMENT TYPE MONTH YEAR
6 Photo 21. View of an approximate 5- to
10-yard stockpile in the central portion of
the Site (February 2022).

Photo 22. View of Kinder Morgan fuel
infrastructure near the northeastern Site
boundary (February 2022).

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 393

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical
Report
The geotechnical report for Matt
Garcia Community Park was
conducted by CE&G. Provided in this
report is the complete analysis and
its findings.

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN
394 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
785 Ygnacio Valley Rd. | Walnut Creek | CA 94596
6455 Almaden Expwy., Suite 100| San José | CA 95120
23785 Cabot Blvd., Suite 321 | Hayward | CA 94545
www.caleng.com

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK, FAIRFIELD, CA
PROJECT NO. 0207491‐001
3 JANUARY 2024
Prepared for:

NCE
501 Canal Boulevard, Suite I
Point Richmond, California 94804

Dave Burger, P.G., E.G. Liang Chern Chow, P.E.

Senior Project Manager/Geologist Project Manager
Reviewed by:

Chris Nardi, P.E., G.E.

Principal Engineer
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
395
Geotechnical Report Page ii
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Site and Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Site Description ................................................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 2

3.0 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................. 3

4.0 Site Geology ...................................................................................................................................................... 4

4.1 Regional Setting and Bedrock Geology ..................................................................................... 4

4.2 Surficial Soils ........................................................................................................................................ 4

4.3 Landslides .............................................................................................................................................. 5

4.4 Regional Groundwater ..................................................................................................................... 5

4.5 Seismicity ............................................................................................................................................... 6

5.0 Field Reconnaissance ................................................................................................................................... 8

6.0 Subsurface Exploration and Testing ..................................................................................................... 9

7.0 Laboratory Testing Program .................................................................................................................. 12

8.0 Geotechnical Considerations .................................................................................................................. 13

8.1 Soil Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 13

8.2 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................................... 13

9.0 Geotechnical Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 17

9.1 Site Grading ......................................................................................................................................... 17

9.2 Foundations ........................................................................................................................................ 22

9.3 Appurtenant Slabs ............................................................................................................................ 28

9.4 Seismic Design Parameters .......................................................................................................... 28

9.5 Site Retaining Walls ......................................................................................................................... 29

9.6 Vehicle Pavements ........................................................................................................................... 31

9.7 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................... 31

10.0 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................... 33

11.0 References ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 396 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page iii
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
TABLES
Table 1: Mapped Surficial Soils .......................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Distances to Selected Active Fault Traces .................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Fill Placement Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 19 Table 4: 2022 CBC Design Parameters .......................................................................................................... 29 Table 5: Flexible Pavement Section Design for R-Value = 7 ................................................................ 31

FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Regional Geology Map
Figure 4 NRCS Soil Map
Figure 5 Fault Activity Map

APPENDICES
Appendix A. Boring Log and Lab Test Data
Appendix B. CPT Data
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
397
Geotechnical Report Page 1
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with our 11 July 2023 contract, Cal Engineering & Geology, a division of Haley & Aldrich, Inc. (CE&G), has prepared this geotechnical report for the proposed Matt Garcia Community Park project located at APN 166-020-240 on Vanden Road in Fairfield, California. This geotechnical report has been prepared to provide data on the surface and subsurface soil conditions at the project site for use during the design and construction of the planned project.
398 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 2
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The project site is located at APN 166-020-240 on Vanden Road in Fairfield, California, northeast of its intersection with Canon Road (Figure 1, Site Location Map and Figure 2, Site Plan). The site is a gently undulating plain with an area of about 50 acres and elevations ranging from approximately 80 to 91 feet above sea level. Geologic maps show a historical stream channel deposit cutting through the center of the site (Figure 3, Regional Geology Map). The stream, identified as Union Creek, had been re-routed to a channel running along the western and southern boundaries of the project site.

2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on conversations with NCE and a review of the preliminary conceptual site plan, we understand the planned community park will include a recreational center building of up to 20,000 square feet, an amphitheater, and a splash pad. In addition, the planned improvements include up to six soccer fields, eight tennis courts, six smaller sports courts, play structures, trails, a dog park, roadways, and parking areas. Structural loads are not available to us at the time this report is being prepared. We have assumed that column loads for the buildings will be less than 50 kips and wall loads will not exceed 3 kips per linear foot. We understand that the site grade will be raised by 3 to 5 feet above the existing grade. We anticipate the development will include underground utilities and landscaping.

General cuts are anticipated to be on the order of 5 feet or less.

If the project differs significantly from that described, we should be contacted to review the applicability of our recommendations.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
399
Geotechnical Report Page 3
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope of work included, but was not limited to:
 Review of available published geologic and geotechnical data applicable to the project;
 Geologic site reconnaissance to observe current site conditions and to mark for Underground Service Alert (USA) utility clearance;
 Subsurface exploration consisting of six (6) soil borings drilled to depths ranging from 11 to 31½ feet below ground surface (bgs) and three (3) Cone Penetration Test (CPT) soundings advanced to depths of about 41 and 42 feet bgs;  Laboratory testing to determine key engineering index properties of selected earth materials;
 Engineering analyses and development of geotechnical design recommendations for the planned structure foundations; and,
 Preparation of this geotechnical report.

CE&G’s work has been specifically limited to the evaluation of the geologic and soil conditions in the vicinity of the project area. Evaluation of the conditions at other areas was beyond the authorized scope of work. Evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous materials at the site was not requested and is beyond the authorized scope of work.
400 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 4
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

4.0 SITE GEOLOGY

4.1 REGIONAL SETTING AND BEDROCK GEOLOGY
The project site lies near the eastern boundary and within the Coast Ranges geomorphic province and west of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Coast Ranges geomorphic province is a series of discontinuous northwest-trending mountain ranges, ridges, and intervening valleys characterized by complex folding and faulting. The greater San Francisco Bay was one of the intervening valleys within the province. The general geologic framework of the San Francisco Bay Area is illustrated in studies by Schlocker (1971), Ellen and Wentworth (1999), and Graymer et al. (2006). Fairfield is located in the North Bay portion of the San Francisco Bay, directly north of the Suisun Bay and Suisun Marsh.

The general vicinity of the project site had been mapped several times, with geologic mapping having different emphases: Wentworth et al. (1997); Knudsen et al. (2000); Graymer at el. (2006); and Witter et al. (2006). (Figure 3, Regional Geologic Map). The distribution of geologic materials in the site vicinity has much to do with its proximity to Union Creek.

Knudsen et al. (2000) mapped Quaternary geologic materials in detail for much of the Bay Area. Much of Knudsen and others’ mapping was incorporated or refined by Witter et al. (2006). For the purposes of the project, the Quaternary geologic mapping of Knudsen et al. (2000), refined by Witter et al. (2006) is the most detailed and pertinent.

The project site is mapped as being underlain by alluvial fan deposits. A historical stream channel deposit (Qha) is shown cutting through the center of the site. The alluvial deposits immediately to the east of the historical stream are shown to be Holocene in age. The alluvial deposits east of the Holocene deposits and west of the historical channel are shown to be Latest Pleistocene in age. Wentworth et al. (2006) describes these materials as sand, gravel, silt, and mud.

4.2 SURFICIAL SOILS
The U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey was reviewed for the project area. The soil survey identifies general shallow soil materials that may be encountered within the upper few feet.

Three soil types are identified within the project area. The distribution of each soil is shown in Figure 4, NRCS Soil Map. These soils and some selective properties are summarized in Table 1 below.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
401
Geotechnical Report Page 5
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Table 1: Mapped Surficial Soils
Soils Name Parental Material Plasticity
Index Range
Shrink‐Swell
Potential USCS
Capay silty
clay loam
(Ca)
Alluvium derived from
igneous, metamorphic,
and sedimentary rock
21 - 29 percent
in upper 81
inches
Medium CL
Diablo Ayar
clays (DaC)
Residuum weathered
from weakly
consolidated sediments
21 - 44 percent
in upper 51
inches
Medium to
high
CL-CH
Yolo loam
(Yr)
Alluvium derived from
sedimentary rock
9 - 44 percent in
upper 60 inches
Low to high ML, CL-CH
The Capay and Yolo units, which occupy most of the site, are considered moderately welldrained soil, have low to high runoff class, and have a moderate to high (about 8 to 10 inches) available water storage in its profile. The capacity of the most limiting layer of this unit to transmit water (Ksat) is considered high (0.06 to 0.2 inches/hour).

4.3 LANDSLIDES
The U.S. Geological Survey and the California Geological Survey have developed regional landslide features maps for the San Francisco Bay Area. The landslide features maps for the Elmira 7.5-minute Quadrangle does not identify any landslides near the project site (Majmundar, 1989). The Association of Bay Area Governments’ (MTC/ABAG, 2023) interactive hazard viewer map indicates the site is located in flat land with little to no potential for rainfall-induced landslides. However, the hillsides to the northeast and southwest of the site have been identified as having few rainfall-induced landslides.

The U.S. Geological Survey’s Open File Report 97-745C titled “Summary Distribution of Slides and Earth Flows in the San Francisco Bay Region, California” and the associated maps prepared by Wentworth, et al. (1997) have developed regional slide and earth flow distribution maps for the area. The report summarizes and improves upon mapping done by Nilsen, Wright, and others. The report indicates the project site is within flat land and, therefore, has little to no potential for earthflows or landslides.

4.4 REGIONAL GROUNDWATER
According to the interactive map created by the California Department of Water Resources, groundwater elevation near the project area ranges from approximately Elevation +76 to 402 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 6
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
+87 feet. These elevations correspond depths of about 15 to 4 feet below ground surface (bgs). Note that the data being referred to was collected between 1952 to 1978.

4.5 SEISMICITY
The project site is located within the greater San Francisco Bay Area, which is recognized as one of the more seismically active regions of California. The right-lateral strike-slip San Andreas fault system controls the northwest-southeast structural grain of the Coast Ranges and the Bay Area. The fault system marks the major boundary between two of earth’s major tectonic plates, the Pacific Plate to the west and the North American Plate to the east.

The Pacific Plate is moving north relative to the North American plate at approximately 40 mm/yr in the Bay Area (WGCEP, 2003).

The transform boundary between these two plates has resulted in a broad zone of multiple subparallel faults within the North American Plate, along which right-lateral strike-slip faulting predominates. In this broad transform boundary, the San Andreas Fault accommodates less than half of the average total relative plate motion. Much of the remainder in the greater San Francisco Bay Area is distributed across faults such as Hayward, Concord, Green Valley, Greenville, and Calaveras fault zones.

An active fault is generally defined as experiencing fault offset in Holocene time (last approximately 11,000 years). According to the US Geological Survey Quaternary Fault and Fold Database, no active faults are mapped as crossing through the site.

Since the project site is located in seismically active California, it will likely experience strong ground shaking from a large, Moment Magnitude [Mw] 6.5 or greater, earthquake along one or more of the nearby active faults during the design lifetime of the project (WGCEP, 2014). Table 2 shows the approximate distances between the project site and various major surface fault traces within approximately 50 km of the site.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
403
Geotechnical Report Page 7
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Table 2: Distances to Selected Active Fault Traces
Fault Name Distance and Direction from
Site to Surface Fault Traces
Great Valley (Gordon Valley) Fault Less than 1 km southwest Great Valley (Pittsburg - Kirby Hill) Fault 3.7 km south Green Valley Connected Fault 18.0 km southwest
Great Valley (Trout Creek) Fault 25.0 km north
Hunting Creek-Berryessa Fault 26.9 km west
West Napa Fault 30.4 km west
Greenville Connected Fault 48.4 km southeast
Mount Diablo Thrust Fault 48.7 km south
Hayward Rodgers Creek Fault 49.1 km southwest
A large-magnitude earthquake on any of these faults or other active fault systems in the San Francisco Bay Area has the potential to cause significant ground shaking at the site. The intensity of ground shaking that is likely to occur at the property is generally dependent upon the magnitude of the earthquake and the distance to the epicenter. 404 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 8
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

5.0 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE
A topographic base map of the project area was created using the most recent publicly available LiDAR and ortho-photographic information available from Solano County.

CE&G performed field reconnaissance of the site on 14 July 2023, in advance of performing the subsurface exploration. Site reconnaissance consisted of photographic documentation of the project site and identifying and marking the boring and CPT locations for utility clearance by Underground Service Alert (USA).

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
405
Geotechnical Report Page 9
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

6.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING
Six exploratory borings were drilled by Geo-Ex Subsurface Exploration (Geo-Ex) of Dixon, California, on 19 and 20 July 2023, using a truck-mounted Diedrich D-70 drill rig equipped with 4-inch (I.D.) diameter hollow-stem augers. The borings were drilled and sampled to depths ranging from approximately 11 to 31½ feet below the existing grade.

On 21 July 2023, Geo-Ex advanced three CPT soundings to depths of approximately 41 to 42 feet below the existing grade using a truck-mounted CPT rig. One pore pressure dissipation test was performed near the termination depths at each CPT to measure hydrostatic water pressures and to infer the approximate depth to groundwater.

Upon completion, the borings and CPT holes were backfilled with cement grout in accordance with Solano County requirements. Drilling spoils were distributed unobtrusively on site.

The approximate locations of the exploratory borings and CPTs are shown in Figure 2, Site Plan.

6.1.1 Logging and Sampling
The materials encountered in the borings were logged in the field by a staff engineer from our office. The soil was visually classified in the field, office, and laboratory according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in general accordance with ASTM D2487 and D2488 standards.

During the drilling operations, soil samples were obtained using the following sampling methods:
 California Modified (CM) Sampler; 3.0-inch outer diameter (O.D.), 2.5-inch inner diameter (I.D.) (ASTM D1586)
 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Split Spoon Sampler; 2.0-inch O.D., 1.375-inch I.D. (ASTM D1586)
The samplers were driven 18 inches into the bottom of the boring (unless otherwise noted on the boring logs) with a 140-pound auto-trip hammer, dropping 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the samplers through each 6-inch interval was recorded for each sample. The results are included in the boring logs in Appendix A. The blow counts included on the boring logs represent the field values and are uncorrected. 406 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 10
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Soil samples obtained from the borings were packaged and sealed in the field to reduce the potential for moisture loss and disturbance. The samples were taken to CE&G’s local office for further analysis and storage.

6.1.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Soil samples from the exploratory test borings were re-examined at our office to review their Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) classification, and selected samples were submitted to our laboratory in Hayward, California, and to Cooper Testing Labs, Inc., in Palo Alto, California, for geotechnical laboratory testing. Samples were tested for moisture content, dry density, Atterberg limits, sieve analysis, Resistance (R)-Value, and corrosion properties. Geotechnical laboratory test results are presented in Appendix A.

6.1.3 Cone Penetration Tests
Geo-Ex used a 20-ton push capacity, truck-mounted push platform that incorporates Hogentogler testing tools, which meet the ASTM D5778 Standard Test Method for Performing Electronic Friction Cone and Piezocone Penetration Testing of Soils. The cones have 15 square centimeter (cm2) tips and 150 cm2 friction sleeves and include a porous filter and pressure sensor. The cone and porous filter are saturated under vacuum with glycerin to promote rapid equilibration with in-situ pore pressures. Cones are advanced at the ASTM standard rate of two cm/second. Baseline readings are performed both before and after each push to measure temperature and load cell drift. The cone measures bearing, friction sleeve, and dynamic pore pressure at two-centimeter intervals, and this data is plotted in real-time and recorded on a laptop computer adjacent to the push platform.

One pore pressure dissipation test was performed at depths of approximately 40 to 42 feet at each CPT to measure hydrostatic water pressures and to infer the approximate depth to groundwater. The CPT logs and dissipation test results are included in Appendix B.

6.1.4 Soil Conditions Encountered
Subsurface conditions at the boring locations generally consisted of topsoil over fine and coarse-grained alluvial soils and bedrock. Firm to hard consistency fat clay was encountered within our borings to depths ranging from 2½ to 9½ feet bgs, with the exception of boring B-3 where lean clay to silt was encountered below the topsoil. Below the fat clay, the borings encountered very soft to hard consistency lean clay, silt, silt with sand, and medium dense silty sand, overlying claystone bedrock. Based on the soil borings and CPT soundings, the silty or sandy soils were 2 to 5 feet thick above the bedrock. The highly weathered claystone bedrock was encountered at borings B-1 and B-2 at depths of CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
407
Geotechnical Report Page 11
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
25 and 30 feet bgs, respectively. However, soundings C-1 through C-3 indicate that bedrock was encountered deeper at around 38 and 42 feet bgs. The results of the subsurface exploration indicate that the depth of the bedrock is somewhat variable across the site.

More detailed descriptions of the materials encountered in the borings are included in the boring logs within Appendix A. Interpretations of soil type based on the CPT results are also included in the CPT sounding logs attached in Appendix B.

6.1.5 Groundwater Conditions Encountered
Groundwater levels were encountered at depths ranging from 7 to 16 feet bgs within borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 at the time of drilling. We note that groundwater was not encountered in B-4 during drilling, but was measured at the end of drilling. The groundwater levels were observed to rise to a depth of approximately 5 and 6 feet within borings B-2 and B-4, respectively, at the end of drilling. Borings B-5 and B-6, which were terminated at a depth of 11 feet bgs did not encounter any groundwater. The dissipation tests performed at each CPT infer that hydrostatic groundwater levels were at the existing ground surface.

Note that fluctuations in rainfall, stream water levels, and other factors not apparent at the time of exploration can influence groundwater levels and may cause several feet of variation.
408 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 12
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

7.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Laboratory testing was performed to obtain information regarding the physical and index properties of the samples recovered during the subsurface exploration program. Tests were performed at the CE&G Testing Laboratory in Hayward, California, and Cooper Testing Labs in Palo Alto, California, in general conformance with applicable ASTM standards. The following tests were performed with applicable ASTM standards:
 Moisture Content and Dry Unit Weight (ASTM D2216)
 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318)
 Sieve Analysis (ASTM D6913)
 R-value (ASTM D2844, CTM 301)
 Corrosion (Caltrans 643, 422, 417, ASTM D2216)
The results of the laboratory tests are summarized on the boring logs and are presented in Appendix A.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
409
Geotechnical Report Page 13
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

8.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 SOIL CONDITIONS
The results of our limited subsurface exploration indicate that the near surface soils in the vicinity of the proposed development are similar to those described in the reviewed geotechnical report for “One Lake – Planning Area 5, Fairfield, California”, dated April 15, 2022, by ENGEO, Inc. (ENGEO, 2022). The project area described within the Engeo report is located approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the planned community park project area.

Our geotechnical exploration program encountered soil conditions consisting of mostly topsoil, fine alluvium (clayey soils), coarse alluvium (silty and sandy soils), and bedrock.

The site is blanketed with 6 to 12 inches of topsoil, overlying the clayey soils consisting of firm to hard consistency lean clay and sandy clay in the upper 20 to 25 feet bgs. Below those fine alluvial soils, our three CPT soundings and two of the borings (B-2 and B-3) penetrated a stratum of loose silty or sandy soil that is potentially susceptible to liquefaction when saturated. These coarse alluvial soils were found at the exploratory locations, which likely corresponds with the historical stream channel that previously traversed through the center of the project area. Under the alluvial soils, claystone bedrock was encountered at depths ranging from 25 to 42 feet bgs. The claystone encountered in our borings was highly weathered and soft. Our laboratory testing indicates that the nearsurface soils have Liquid Limits below 50 with Plasticity Indices ranging between 18 to 28 percent. The soils, therefore, are judged to have a moderate to high expansion potential.

8.2 GROUNDWATER
Groundwater was encountered in borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 at depths ranging between 7 and 16 feet bgs at the time of drilling. Within borings B-2 and B-4, groundwater levels rose to a depth of 5 and 6 feet at the end of drilling. The CPT dissipation test results indicate that groundwater levels were at the ground surface. We have evaluated the pore pressure dissipation test data and determined that these results are likely incorrect given the observed dry nature of the surficial material at the site and groundwater elevation observed within the boreholes completed nearby.

The ENGEO (2022) report indicated that groundwater depths ranging from 4 to 10½ feet bgs were observed in March 2022. In addition, the Water Data Library interactive website available through the California Department of Water Resources indicates that a nearby well, located approximately 700 feet south of the project, recorded a historical high groundwater at a depth of about 4 feet bgs in 1965. Based on the reviewed data and the geotechnical data obtained from our field exploration, we judge that the groundwater 410 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 14
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
elevations are likely on average at depths of about 5 feet bgs, and a design groundwater depth of 4 feet below existing grades should be used.

Groundwater levels can fluctuate seasonally and/or over a period of years. Therefore, it is possible that adverse groundwater conditions could be encountered during construction.

The contractor should be prepared for this possibility.

8.2.1 Fault Rupture
The site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone for active faults as defined by the State Geologist. However, the nearest Great Valley fault is located less than 1 km southwest of the site. ENGEO (2022) reported that fault trenching in February 2017 indicated no evidence of active faulting at their site and concluded that ground rupture was unlikely.

Based on this and our review of the publicly available data, it is our opinion that the potential for surface rupture due to primary faulting at the site is low.

8.2.2 Ground Accelerations
Due to the proximity of the site to numerous active fault systems which traverse the greater San Francisco Bay Area, it is likely that the property will be subjected to the effects of a major earthquake during the design life of the proposed improvements. The effects are likely to consist of significant ground accelerations. These types of ground movements may cause damage to future improvements. This potential hazard should be taken into consideration when designing the proposed developments.

8.2.3 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is the process in which saturated, cohesionless soil experiences a temporary loss of strength based on the buildup of excess pore water pressure during cyclic loading resulting from earthquake ground motions. The type of soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose, clean, saturated, uniformly graded sand and silt which have low clay content. Flow failure, lateral spreading, differential settlement, loss of bearing strength, ground fissures, and sand boils are evidence of liquefaction.

The site is located within the Elmira 7.5-minute Quadrangle that is outside of the Seismic Hazard Zone mapped by the California Geological Survey for seismically induced hazards.

However, based on Witter et al. (2006), the site is shown to have low to very high liquefaction susceptibility, especially along the historical stream channel deposit, as described earlier.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
411
Geotechnical Report Page 15
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
We evaluated liquefaction potential at the site by performing analyses in accordance with the methodology presented in publications prepared by Idriss and Boulanger (2008) and Boulanger and Idriss (2014). Our liquefaction analyses were performed using data from our explorations using a design groundwater depth of 4 feet bgs, a peak ground motion of

0.637g, and a moment magnitude of 6.51.

Based on our analyses, we conclude that the potential for liquefaction to occur at the site is moderate to high, given the presence of saturated and silty and sandy soils encountered at the boring and CPT locations. Areas judged with higher liquefaction susceptibility potential have been interpreted within the historical creek channel running through the central portion of the project area. An increased potential for settlement of improvements within the zone of the historical stream channel should be considered.

The potentially liquefiable soils include the loose silty and sandy soils which were identified between approximately 24 and 38 feet bgs. The thickness of the layers is variable across the site. Total free-field (volumetric) settlement from a design seismic event is estimated to be between about ½ and 2 inches with the greatest estimated liquefaction settlements located at soundings C-1 and C-3 locations.

In the ENGEO (2022) report, they estimated liquefaction settlements ranging from ½ to 3 inches using their geotechnical data. They noted that a northernmost boring, 1-B09, which is closest to our project site, has been estimated to experience up to 3 inches of liquefaction settlement during the design earthquake event. Based on this, we recommend designing the structures to accommodate up to 2 inches of seismic-induced settlement with a differential settlement of 1 inch over 50 feet.

8.2.4 Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading is a type of ground instability that results in ground displacements that occur when the liquefaction of a soil layer causes insufficient strength for lateral stability.

This phenomenon can occur when either the ground surface or the soil layer subject to liquefaction is sloped, or when there is an open slope face or stream channel adjacent to a potentially liquefiable soil layer. The site is relatively flat; therefore, it is our opinion that the potential for lateral spreading to occur at the site is low.

8.2.5 Seismically Induced Subsidence
Seismically-induced ground shaking can cause vertical subsidence of specific types of soils.

Seismically-related settlement generally results from the densification of loose sands and 412 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 16
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
sandy silts. Based on the soils encountered in the borings and CPTs, it is our opinion that the potential for significant seismically-induced subsidence is low.

8.2.6 Ground Lurching
Ground lurching is a phenomenon whereby strong seismic shaking causes cracking and deformation of the ground surface in areas underlain by soft weak soils. The cracking and deformation are the result of the disruption of the passing earthquake waves. Based on the soils encountered in the borings (firm to hard clays), it is our opinion that the potential for ground lurching to occur at the site is low.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
413
Geotechnical Report Page 17
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
The geotechnical recommendations included in this report are preliminary for the overall development of the site and should be reviewed and revised accordingly upon the development of the actual improvement plans.

Geotechnical recommendations for other improvements not provided within the conceptual improvement plan may require a separate subsurface investigation and report.

9.1 SITE GRADING
It is anticipated that conventional cut and fill grading will be required to establish desired grades for overall project area, building pads, foundations, and other site improvements.

We understand that 3 to 5 feet of grade raise is planned for the development and fill materials will likely be imported from the neighboring site to the south described in ENGEO (2022) report. The materials anticipated for use as fill are discussed in Section

9.1.3. 9.1.1 Excavations
The subsurface exploration within the site revealed approximately 6 to 12 inches of topsoil over alluvial soils. Based on that, we recommend that areas that are raised to achieve the overall design grades where the topsoil and underlying soils have been impacted by seasonal desiccation be ripped, moisture conditioned, and compacted prior to the placement of the fill. We also recommend a minimum of 2 feet of over-excavation in the areas of the proposed building pads using a shallow foundation prior to the placement of fill. This should be completed in order to provide a minimum of 5 feet of engineered fill below the bottom of the shallow-founded structures.

The limits of the over-excavation should extend a minimum of 5 feet beyond the planned building pads. The bottom of the excavation should be ripped a minimum of 8 inches, and compaction effort should be applied until firm and unyielding. If soft conditions persist, then the contractor may elect to place Mirafi 500x, or equivalent, woven geotextile fabric at the base of the excavation. Alternatively, the contractor may elect to deepen the overexcavation until firm materials are encountered, as determined by the engineer or geologist on site.

9.1.2 Fill Placement
Before beginning the grading operation, the site should be cleared and grubbed of existing vegetation. All existing structures and debris should be removed from the site, including 414 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 18
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
but not limited to foundations systems, leach fields, septic tank, basements, groundwater wells, buried pipes etc. All depressions created by the tree removal and demolition of existing structures should be excavated to firm soil prior to the placement of fill. All loose soil and vegetation should be removed from the areas to receive fill.

All fills should be founded on firm competent soil. It is anticipated that the depth to firm competent soil will be encountered at variable depths. We recommend that a representative of CE&G observe and test the subgrade soils prior to the placement of new fill.

All fills less than 5 feet deep and placed on slopes 5H:1V (horizontal to vertical) or flatter can be benched into firm on-site soil materials. All other fills shall be keyed at least 3 feet into competent materials on the downhill sides of the excavations.

All fill should be placed in a controlled manner as engineered fill. All fill materials should be compacted to no less than those specifications indicated on Table 3 as determined by the ASTM D-1557 (latest revision). Fill materials should be spread evenly and compacted in uniform lifts not exceeding 8 inches in un-compacted thickness. Fill materials that do not meet the specified relative compaction should be ripped, moisture conditioned, and reworked until the specified relative compaction and moisture content are attained.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
415
Geotechnical Report Page 19
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Table 3: Fill Placement Criteria
Fill Material Location
Fill Placement
Relative
Compaction*
Moisture
Content* Other
On-site soils Fill beneath building
slabs and appurtenant
structures on shallow
foundations,
pavements
88% (min) to
92% (max)
4% (min)
over
optimum
Pre-soak prior to
placement of
aggregate base or
slabs and
appurtenances
On site soils Trench backfill 90% (min) to
93% (max)
2% (min)
over
optimum
Select on-site
nonexpansive or
imported
nonexpansive
Foundations, beneath
slabs and appurtenant
structures on shallow
foundations, retaining
wall reinforced zone,
trench backfill
90% (min) 3% (min)
over
optimum
Compaction effort
should not load
retaining wall;
CE&G to provide
specific criteria if
trench is greater
than 5 feet deep
Aggregate
base
Appurtenant slabs 93% (min) 2% (min)
over
optimum
Take care not to
over-compact
subgrade when
placing aggregate
base
Aggregate
base
Trench backfill 93% (min),
95% (min) in
the upper 12
inches of
Pavement
areas
2% (min)
over
optimum
Take care not to
over-compact
subgrade when
placing aggregate
base
Aggregate
base
Pavements 95% (min) 2% (min)
over
optimum
Take care not to
over-compact
subgrade when
placing aggregate
base
*determined in relationship to the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content per ASTM D1557 (latest edition).

9.1.3 Material for Fill
We understand that fill will be imported from the neighboring site to raise the desired grades. Based on the ENGEO (2022) report, we judge that the native soil (lean clay, lean clay with sand, clayey sand, sandy lean clay) as encountered in their soil borings are 416 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 20
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
suitable for fill, given that the soil used for fill meets the conditions for “general on-site fill” described below. Our recommendations for fill placed at the site meet the requirements for either: 1) general on-site fill, 2) imported non-expansive fill, or 3) Caltrans Class 2 aggregate base. A minimum of five days will be required to evaluate and test the suitability of all proposed imported materials. Recommendations for each of these materials are provided as follows:
 General on‐site fill: General on-site fill should be non-hazardous, free of organic matter, contain no rocks or lumps greater than 3 inches in greatest dimension, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer. General on-site fill may be used to raise site grades and backfill utility excavations; however, it should not be used directly for support of slab-on-grade. This fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. Fills should be moisture-conditioned and compacted to the recommendations discussed in Table 3.  Imported and on‐site select non‐expansive fill: Imported non-expansive fill may be used to raise site grades, as backfill for underground utility trench excavations, and placed and compacted as foundation subgrade. This material should meet the same specifications as general on-site fill, and in addition should a) have corrosion properties that are similar or better to the on-site soils, b) have a low expansion potential (defined as a liquid limit less than 40 and a plasticity index lower than 12 and/or shown to have a low expansion potential through swell test results), c) have a fines content between 8 and 40 percent; and d) be approved for use at the site by CE&G. Imported, select, non-expansive fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness, moisture-conditioned to above the optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. If select, non-expansive fill is imported to the site, CE&G may recommend specific testing of the imported fill to confirm soil properties.  Class 2 Aggregate Base: Aggregate base material that meets the specifications for Caltrans Class 2 aggregate base should be used where specified beneath slab-ongrade floors, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete pavements, and concrete sidewalks. The aggregate base should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness, moisture-conditioned to above the optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. Class 2 Aggregate Base should be proof-rolled using a fully loaded water truck (or equivalent equipment) under the observation of the project geotechnical engineer or his/her representative, as a condition of its acceptance as pavement or building slab support.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
417
Geotechnical Report Page 21
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.1.4 Utility Trench Excavation and Backfill
All excavations made during the development of the site should be backfilled with engineered fill. This includes excavations created during the installation of utility lines, sewer lines, etc. The engineered fill should be compacted to no less than those specifications indicated in Table 3 as determined by the ASTM D-1557 (latest revision). It is anticipated that the on-site soil materials will be suitable for use as trench backfill. No loose or uncontrolled backfilling of depressions resulting from stripping or tree removal should be permitted.

It is recommended that an impervious seal be created wherever a trench passes beneath perimeter foundation elements. The impermeable seal should be designed to prevent nearsurface water from entering beneath the planned building and associated improvements along the utility trench. The impermeable seal should extend for a distance of at least 3 feet on each side of the perimeter foundation.

Utility trenches less than 5 feet in depth in the near-surface soil materials should be able to stand near vertical with minimal bracing. Sandy soils, where encountered, may need bracing to prevent the caving of the granular soils. We estimate that excavations should be able to be accomplished with conventional excavating equipment, such as backhoes and excavators. Excavations should be constructed in accordance with the current CAL-OSHA safety standards and local jurisdiction. The stability and safety of excavations, braced or unbraced, are the responsibility of the contractor.

Pipe zone backfill, extending from the bottom of the trench to about 1 foot above the top of the pipe, should consist of free-draining sand (at least 90% passing a No. 4 sieve and less than 5% passing a No. 200 sieve) compacted to a firm and yielding condition unless concrete or cement slurry is specified. Care should be taken not to damage the pipe during the compaction effort. The compaction effort of the sand material should consist of vibratory methods. The backfill material should completely encompass the pipe with no voids or bridging.

Above the pipe zone, underground utility trenches may be backfilled with free-draining sand, on-site soil, or imported soil that is free of deleterious and hazardous material. The trench backfill should be compacted to the requirements given in Section 9.1.2. Trench backfill should be capped with at least 12 inches of compacted, on-site soil similar to that of the adjoining subgrade. The upper 12 inches of trench backfill in areas to be paved should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. Compaction should be performed by mechanical means only. Water jetting or flooding to attain compaction of backfill should not be permitted.
418 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 22
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Trench excavations that extend below an imaginary plane inclined at 1½:1 (h:v) below the bottom edge of foundations should be properly shored to maintain support of the existing facilities. Trenches that run parallel to the proposed foundations should not be excavated within the imaginary plane inclined at 1½:1 (h:v) below the bottom of the footing.

9.1.5 Lime‐Treated On‐Site Soil
Lime treatment of expansive clay and silt soils reduces the expansion potential by chemically reacting with the active clay minerals within the soil and altering their engineering properties. For planning purposes, it is recommended that a lime content of 4 percent of dry unit weight be assumed.

We recommend that a specialty lime-treatment subcontractor having a Class A or Class C12 license with a minimum of 5-year experience in the lime-treatment of soils be used.

The excavation subgrade should be lime treated, evenly mixed and compaction effort applied. A minimum of 24 hours should be provided to allow for hydration and mellowing before the placement of fill. The bottom of the excavation should be probed and should be acceptable by an engineer or geologist from CE&G.

The material should then be mixed again before placement and the application of compaction effort. Testing of the lime-treated engineered fill should be completed at a minimum of 2 vertical feet and meet a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction based on the maximum wet density value.

9.2 FOUNDATIONS
We understand that the site grades will be raised by 3 to 5 feet above the existing grade. As described in Section 8.0, topsoil ranging from 6 to 12 inches blankets the site. In our opinion, the proposed structures can be supported by the recommended foundations bearing on the proposed engineered fill, surficial soils, and bedrock. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered during our subsurface exploration and our understanding of the planned development, we recommend that the proposed community center, amphitheater, or other occupied structures, bridges, etc. be founded on either spread footings, mat slabs, or pier and grade beam type foundations.

We estimate that total static settlement will be less than 1-inch, with a differential settlement of less than ½-inch over 50 feet for foundations designed as described below.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
419
Geotechnical Report Page 23
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.2.1 Shallow Foundation
It is anticipated that shallow foundations will be used at the site. Recommendations for the required subgrade preparation and design of each of these types of shallow foundations are provided below.

9.2.1.1 Foundation Preparation for Shallow Foundations
The use of shallow foundations will require that the subgrade below the footprint of each building be prepared to receive placement of non-expansive fill to underlie the foundation.

The thickness of the non-expansive fill will depend on the type of shallow foundation system utilized. The area underlying each building and 5 feet beyond should be overexcavated at least 5 feet or through the surficial soil and scarified (additional removals may be required to remove and replace areas of soft or otherwise variable quality as discussed in Section 9.1 – Site Grading). The scarified surface should be moisture conditioned to at least 4 percent over optimum moisture as determined by ASTM D1557 and compacted to between 88 and 92 percent relative compaction. The scarified and recompacted surface should be in a firm, un-yielding condition before the placement of fill or a concrete structural mat.

9.2.1.2 Spread Footings with Concrete Slabs
Spread footing type foundations may be utilized where the bottoms of the footings are founded on a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill materials consisting of either imported soil or lime-treated on-site materials. Recommendations for non-expansive materials are provided in Section 9.1.3. The non-expansive engineered fill material should extend a minimum of 5 feet beyond the perimeter of the spread footings. The following parameters should be used for spread footings founded on at least 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill.

All footings should be extended at least 2 feet into non-expansive engineered fill. The bottoms of all footings should be underlain by at least 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill.

The following geotechnical parameters can be used in the design of the spread footing supported on at least 3 feet of non-expansive engineered fill.

Allowable Bearing Capacity 3,000 psf static for dead plus live loads. This value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic forces.

Coefficient of Friction 0.35
420 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 24
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Passive Equivalent Fluid Weight 300 pcf beginning 1 foot below the ground surface at the front of the toe of the footing.

Final foundation designs should be based on structural design considerations. The foundations should be designed by the project structural engineer, however, at a minimum, the footings should be reinforced with no less than four #4 bars, two near the top and two near the bottom.

If it is desirable to use concrete slab-on-grade construction for the interior floor areas of the new building(s), it is recommended that a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill be placed beneath the slab-on-grade floors. The concrete slab-on-grade floor in the interior areas of the building(s) should be structurally connected to the interior and perimeter foundation footings. The interior slabs-on-grade should be designed to be structurally stronger than conventional free-floating slabs to allow for stress transfer into the slab from the foundations and/or the potential differential settlement.

The concrete slab floor should be a minimum of 6 inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of #3 bars at 12-inches on center in both directions or #4 bars in both directions at 18-inch centers. The steel reinforcement should be placed in the middle of the slab and should be held in place by dobie blocks or other suitable means. In areas where higher concentrated loads are anticipated on the interior concrete slab-on-grade floor, the floor should be thickened by a minimum of 50 percent and structurally isolated from the rest of the floor. Actual dimensions and reinforcement requirements should be determined by the project structural engineer. Even with the steel reinforcement, it should be anticipated that some cracking of the slabs will likely occur.

If it is desirable to reduce the potential for moisture migration through the slab, then a moisture vapor retarder should be placed beneath the concrete. The moisture vapor retarder should be designed to minimize moisture vapor transmission through the concrete. The vapor retarder should be a minimum of 15 mils thick and meet the specifications outlined in ASTM E-1745 latest revisions; Standard Specification of Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Soil or Granular Fill under Concrete Slabs. The vapor retarder membrane should be underlain by a 4-inch layer of free-draining crushed rock.

Unless otherwise deemed unnecessary via manufacturer recommendations, the vapor retarder can be covered with a 2-inch thick, uniform layer of sand to protect the membrane during construction.

All seams, tears, rips, or penetrations in the moisture vapor barrier should be taped and sealed in conformance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Other methods of CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
421
Geotechnical Report Page 25
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
controlling moisture vapor transmission through the concrete floor slab such as using low water to cement ratios should be used in the design of the concrete.

9.2.2 Structural Mat Foundations
A structural mat type foundation may be utilized to support the new building(s) where the placement of at least 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill beneath the structures is deemed to be impractical. Even with a structural mat slab, it is recommended that within the building footprints plus 5 feet beyond the subgrade be prepared as recommended in the grading section of this report and that the slab be underlain by at least 1 foot of nonexpansive engineered fill.

The structural mat slabs should be designed to be structurally strong enough to support the imposed loads of the buildings and to resist any potential differential movement. The loading and design of the slab should be determined in accordance with WRI/CRSI Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundations as recommended in Section 1808A.6.2, “Slab-on-ground foundations,” of the 2022 California Building Code. As an alternative design method, the structural mat slabs may be designed to accommodate an assumed differential movement of 1-inch over a distance of 10 feet. The mat slabs may be designed utilizing an allowable bearing capacity of 2000 psf and a modulus of subgrade reaction of 75 pci.

If it is desirable to reduce the potential for moisture migration through the slab, then consideration should be given to the installation of a moisture vapor retarder as described in Section 9.2.1.2.

9.2.3 Construction Considerations for Shallow Foundations During utility trench excavation and backfilling, previously compacted subgrade soils beneath the building envelope may become disturbed by the construction operations.

These disturbed soils should be uniformly moisture conditioned to at least 3 percent above optimum moisture content and re-compacted to no less than 90 percent relative compaction to provide a smooth and unyielding surface. The upper 12 inches of the subgrade soils should be pre-saturated to at least 4 percent above optimum moisture content prior to construction of the foundation system. The pre-saturated pads should not be allowed to dry-out to less than the recommended moisture content. The moisture content of the subgrade should be checked immediately prior to the placement of capillary moisture break or concrete placement.
422 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 26
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.2.4 Pier‐and‐Grade Beam Foundation
For structures supported on pier and grade beam type foundations, the foundation piers should be designed as drilled cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) concrete piers, deriving their load carrying capacity from frictional resistance between the pier shaft and the surrounding soil materials.

We recommend use of the following design parameters for a pier and grade beam foundation system.

Minimum pier diameter: 16 inches.

Allowable skin friction: 600 psf in competent soil below a depth of 3 feet below the finished grade.

Pier spacing: Minimum three diameters on center.

Minimum reinforcing steel: Four #4 bars w/ #3 stirrups at 12 inches on center.

Minimum pier depths: 20 feet deep and 12 feet into alluvial soil or greater as otherwise required by the project structural engineer.

Lateral soil loads: Piers located within 10 feet of a descending sloping surface steeper than 10:1 should be designed for a
lateral creep load of 100 psf acting over two pier
diameters for the upper 3 feet of the soil profile. To
resist the lateral loading, an ultimate passive equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pcf acting over two pier diameters can be assumed for the soil below a depth of 3 feet. A
factor of safety of 1.5 can be used to determine an
allowable passive pressure. The passive resistance of
the upper 3 feet soil should be neglected in the
structural calculations. Where piers are located near
slopes, the depth to be ignored shall be increased to a depth at which the distance from the slope side of the
pier is a minimum of 10 horizontal feet from the face of the slope.

Final design of the pier diameters, depths, and spacing should be based on structural design considerations. All perimeter piers and interior piers should be structurally connected with grade beams and tie beams. The grade beams and tie beams should be CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
423
Geotechnical Report Page 27
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
designed by the project structural engineer. Grade beam and tie beam dimensions and steel reinforcing requirements should be determined based on the design structural loads.

To the extent possible, the grade beams and tie beams should be no greater than 12 inches wide. At a minimum, the grade beams and tie beams should be reinforced with no less than four #4 bars, two near the top and two near the bottom.

Care should be taken to ensure that the grade beams and tie beams do not interfere with the air cross-flow ventilation beneath the buildings. Cross flow ventilation should be considered during the design phase of the project. Cross flow ventilation beneath buildings should be designed by the project architect and/or structural engineer.

Due to the moderate to highly expansive nature of the on-site soil and anticipated import materials, we recommend that the foundation elements be designed to resist a net uplift pressure of 600 pounds per square foot acting on the underside of the grade beams. The uplift forces can be resisted by skin friction acting on the sides of the CIDH concrete piers.

For uplift conditions, an allowable skin friction equal to 400 psf should be used below a depth of 4 feet, and the weight of the concrete may be included. The top 5 feet of skin friction should be neglected in the design.

9.2.5 Drilled Pier Construction
The bottoms of the foundation pier holes should be dry and free of loose cuttings and debris prior to installation of the reinforcing steel and concrete. This shall be done to the satisfaction of the engineer or geologist from CE&G who observes the drilling operations.

The concrete should be placed carefully in the pier holes so that over pouring of the piers (mushrooming at the top) does not occur and the concrete does not have a free fall drop in excess of 4 feet.

Groundwater was encountered during the July 2023 subsurface exploration between 5 and 16 feet below ground surface along the flat portion of the site. Groundwater levels can fluctuate seasonally and over a period of years, so it is possible that adverse groundwater conditions could be encountered during the drilling of the foundation piers. The contractor should be prepared to drill and place the steel and concrete for the foundation piers on the same day, should adverse groundwater conditions be encountered during construction.

Water should not be allowed to remain in a drilled pier hole overnight. Should this occur, it will be necessary for the contractor to enlarge the hole to a wider diameter and/or a greater depth to the satisfaction of the engineer or geologist from our office who is observing the drilling operation.
424 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 28
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.3 APPURTENANT SLABS
It is anticipated that concrete slabs will be utilized for walkways, seating areas, etc. To reduce the potential for cracking of the appurtenant concrete slabs, we recommend that the slabs be a minimum of 5 inches thick and include minimum reinforcement of #3 bars in both directions at 12-inch centers or #4 bars in both directions at 18-inch centers. The steel should be placed in the middle of the slab and should be held in place by dobie blocks or other suitable means. Actual dimensions and reinforcement should be determined by the project structural engineer. Consideration should also be given to the placement of 12 inches of Class 2 aggregate base rock beneath the slabs.

All exterior slabs should be isolated from the building foundations. Felt should be placed along expansion joints. Even with the steel reinforcement and base rock, it should be recognized that some cracking of the slabs and/or heaving will likely occur and should be expected.

In the areas where landscaping walkways and other improvements are to be made, we recommend a minimum of 2 feet of over-excavation below the bottom of the aggregate base rock and that soil be re-compacted as engineered fill in order to provide a more stable base for support of the structures. Because of the expansion potential of the site soils, removal and re-compaction of the loose soils will reduce, but not eliminate, differential movement of shallow founded structures and some cracking of the slabs may occur and should be expected.

All exterior concrete slabs-on-grade located within 10 feet of a downslope will be subject to the effects of long-term and ongoing downslope creep of the near surface soils. Downslope soil creep of the near surface soils has the potential to cause sloping and cracking of the concrete slabs. If it is desirable to minimize the potential impacts of soil creep on these elements, then the slabs should be supported on drilled piers. The piers can be designed using the parameters provided in this report.

9.4 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
Due to the proximity of the site to the numerous active fault systems that traverse the greater San Francisco Bay Area, it is likely that the project site will be subjected to the effects of a major earthquake during the design life of the proposed improvements. The effects are likely to consist of significant ground shaking and accelerations. These groundtype movements may cause damage to the proposed improvements. Therefore, we recommend that at a minimum the structural systems for the proposed improvements be CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
425
Geotechnical Report Page 29
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
designed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 16 of the 2022 California Building Code and ASCE 7-16 for Site Class D type soils. The California Building Code seismic design parameters for the site are included in Table 3. It is assumed that the anticipated single or two-story structures will have a period of vibration less than 0.5 seconds, allowing the parameters to be based upon ASCE 7-16 Table 11.4-2. This assumption should be confirmed by the structural engineer.

Using tools contained on the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool website, we determined the following parameters and site acceleration in accordance with ASCE 7-16 (2022 CBC).

Table 4: 2022 CBC Design Parameters
Item Design
Value
Source
Site Class Definition D Table 20.3-1

0.2 Second Spectral Response Acceleration, Ss 1.391 Figure 22-1

1.0 Second Spectral Response Acceleration, S1 0.489 Figure 22-2 Values of Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Table 11.4-1
Value of Site Coefficient, Fv null* Table 11.4-2
Designed Spectral Response Acceleration for Short
Periods, SDS

0.927 Equation 11.4-2
(SDS=2/3(FaSs)
Designed Spectral Response Acceleration for 1-Sec
Periods, SD1
null* Equation 11.4-2
(SDS=2/3(FvS1)
*The design parameters tabulated herein are based on the assumption that the fundamental period of the proposed structure T<Ts and equivalent static force procedure is used. * Values of Fv and SD1 are undefined for this site class without the performance of a site-specific ground motion hazard analysis.

The ASCE 7 Hazard Tool website has also estimated that the Maximum Credible Earthquake (MCEG) peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 0.579. In addition, the site amplification factor at PGA (FPGA) is 1.1 with a site-modified peak ground acceleration (PGAM) of 0.637.

9.5 SITE RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls may be required to achieve desired grades for the proposed improvements.

If retaining walls are required and/or desired, these site retaining walls should be designed for at-rest conditions. Based on the data gathered from our subsurface exploration and the provided project plans, the site retaining walls under 6 feet tall may be supported on either 426 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 30
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
spread footings or on a pier and grade beam type foundation. Walls greater than 6 feet should be supported on a pier and grade beam type foundation.

9.5.1 Lateral Loading

9.5.1.1 Site Retaining Walls
Spread footing type foundations may be utilized where the bottoms of the footings are founded on a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive engineered fill materials consisting of either imported soil.

9.5.1.2 Seismic Lateral Loading
Site retaining walls which retain more than 6 feet should be evaluated for seismic loading using a seismic increment equivalent to an additional equivalent fluid earth pressure of 47 pcf for level backfill and 60 pcf for 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) sloped backfill. For back slopes between level and 2H:1V, the seismic increment equivalent fluid pressure should be interpolated between 47 pcf and 60 pcf.

9.5.1.3 Drainage for Site Retaining Walls
The above pressures assume fully-drained conditions behind the retaining walls.

Therefore, the retaining walls should be provided with a full-height back wall drainage consisting of a 12-inch wide layer of Caltrans Class 2 permeable drain material or a 12-inch wide layer of ¾ inch crushed rock wrapped in a 6 ounce per square yard non-woven filter fabric. A perforated ABS SDR 35 plastic pipe should be placed at the heel of the wall. The pipe should be placed with the perforations down and the pipe and the material at base of the wall drain should be installed with a cross gradient of not less than 1 percent.

All site retaining walls should be waterproofed to prevent moisture migration through the concrete walls. The waterproofing system should be designed by the project architect and/or structural engineer and reviewed by our office.

9.5.2 Site Retaining Wall Foundations
Site retaining walls can also be constructed using a spread footing or drilled pier foundation. We recommend foundations of the site retaining walls be designed in accordance with the parameters provided in Section 9.2.1 for spread footing and Section

9.2.4 for pier foundation.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
427
Geotechnical Report Page 31
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

9.6 VEHICLE PAVEMENTS
New pavements will be constructed as part of the project. We understand design Traffic Indices (TIs) have not yet been established for the subject site, but we estimate that they will be in the range of between 4 and 6. We have developed alternate pavement sections for these TIs. The actual pavement sections for the proposed improvements should be determined by the project Civil Engineer. Based on the lab testing results, the R-value is 7 for the composite soil sampled within the upper 5 feet. Table 5 below presents the recommended pavement sections based on R-value of 7:

Table 5: Flexible Pavement Section Design for R‐Value = 7 Traffic Index Asphalt
Concrete (feet)
Class 2 Aggregate
Base
(feet)
Total
Pavement
(feet)

4.0 0.25 0.80 1.05

5.0 0.25 0.80 1.05

6.0 0.30 1.05 1.35
Pavement sections should be placed on prepared soil surfaces as outlined in this report’s Grading section. The full section of the aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557, latest edition).

Asphalt concrete should meet the requirements for ½- or ¾-inch maximum, medium Type B Hot Mix Asphalt, Section 39, Caltrans Standard Specifications, latest edition. The Class 2 aggregate base material should conform to Section 26 of the Caltrans Standard Specifications.

9.7 SURFACE DRAINAGE
The site should be positively sloped toward the appropriate stormwater collection facility, such as a bioswale and/or landscape areas to provide. Slope gradients should be sufficient to provide for rapid removal of surface water runoff. Ponding of water within the project area at any time during or after construction should be prevented. To reduce the potential for ponding of water, we recommend the following be included in the design. 1) The finished surface of the soil and pavement should slope toward the appropriate structures/areas at a gradient of 2 percent minimum to provide for rapid removal of surface water runoff.
2) All stormwater from drain inlets should be collected in a solid pipe drain system and discharged into an appropriate discharge facility.
428 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 32
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Final design of the stormwater collection facilities should be completed by the project civil engineer.

The areas adjacent to the planned building and other improvements should be positively sloped away from the building to provide for rapid removal of surface water runoff.

Ponding of water adjacent to floors or seepage toward foundation systems at any time during or after construction should be prevented.

To reduce the potential for ponding of water adjacent to the foundation, we recommend the following be included in the design:

1. Soil should be sloped away from the perimeter of the foundation at a gradient of 5 percent for at least 10 feet to provide for rapid removal of surface water runoff.

2. All stormwater from roof downspouts should be collected in a solid drainpipe system and discharged into an appropriate collection facility.

3. Planted areas should be avoided immediately adjacent to the building and other foundation elements. If planting adjacent to the building is desired, the use of plants that require very little moisture is recommended. Irrigation of landscaped areas should be limited strictly to that necessary for plant growth. Sprinkler systems should not be installed where they may cause ponding or saturation of foundation soils within 10 feet from walls or under the structures.

4. Consideration should be given to the construction of a subdrain system around the perimeter of the buildings and along the upslope sides of the foundation elements.

The subdrain system should be designed to intercept surface and near-surface water before reaching the perimeter foundation and, if applicable, underfloor areas.

The subdrain should consist of 4-inch diameter perforated ABS SDR 35 pipe encapsulated in ¾-inch clean crushed rock wrapped in a non-woven geotextile or Class 2 permeable drain rock. The subdrain trench should extend at least 12 inches below the bottom of the perimeter grade beams or the grade of the interior soils, whichever is greater. The drain pipe should be connected to a solid wall pipe that discharges to an erosion-resistant discharge point located away from the foundation elements, building envelope, and associated improvements.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
429
Geotechnical Report Page 33
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

10.0 LIMITATIONS
We have employed accepted geotechnical and civil engineering and engineering geologic procedures, and our professional opinions and conclusions are made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geologic principles and practices. This standard is in lieu of all warranties, either expressed or implied.

It is the owner’s responsibility to ensure that the recommendations contained in this report are brought to the attention of the architect, engineers, and contractors working on the project. Furthermore, it is the owner’s responsibility to make sure that these recommendations are carried out during the design and construction phases of the project.

Site conditions described in the text of this report are those existing at the time of our last field reconnaissance in July 2023 and are not necessarily representative of the site conditions at other times or locations.

Unanticipated soil conditions are frequently encountered during construction and cannot be fully determined by excavating and sampling a limited number of exploratory borings and CPTs. Additional expenditures may be required during the construction phases of the project as conditions vary. It is recommended that a contingency fund be established to cover potential adverse soil and groundwater conditions which may be encountered during construction. If it is found during construction that subsurface conditions differ from those described on the boring logs, then the conclusions, recommendations, and calculations shall be considered invalid, unless CE&G is provided an opportunity to determine if the conditions necessitate modifications to design and/or construction of the retaining wall.

The findings of this report should be considered valid for a period of three years unless the conditions of the site change. After a period of three years, we should be contacted to review the site conditions and prepare a letter regarding the applicability of this report.

Field observation and testing services are essential parts of the proposed project. It is important that CE&G be retained to observe grading and retaining wall construction. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon this stipulation.

430 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 34
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™

11.0 REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7 Hazard Tool, www. asce7hazardtool.online, Accessed on August 25, 2023.

Association of Bay Area Governments, 2023, MTC/ABAG Hazard Viewer Map, https://mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42e ab29b35dfcd086fc8.

Boulanger, R.W. and Idriss, I.M., 2014. CPT and SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures. Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01.

California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known Active Faults Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada, International Conference of Building Officials, Map Scale 1.2 inches = 5 km.

California Department of Transportation, 2013, Caltrans fault database and Caltrans ARS online reports and data.

California Department of Water Resources, 2023, Water Data Library Station Map Interactive website, https://wdl.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/Map.aspx California Structural Engineers Association/OSHPD Seismic Design Maps, https://seismicmaps.org/
Ellen, S. D., Wentworth, C.M., 1995, Hillside Materials and Slopes of the San Francisco Bay Region, California, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1357, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 215p, Map Scale 1:125,000.

ENGEO, Inc. (2022), One Lake – Planning Area 5, Fairfield, California, Project No. 10755.000.004, April 15, 2022.

Graymer, R.W., Jones, D.L., and Brabb, E.E., 1994, Preliminary Geologic Map Emphasizing Bedrock Formations in Contra Costa County, California, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 94-622, Map Scale 1:75,000.

Graymer et. al., 2006, Geologic Map of the San Francisco Bay Region, California Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2918.

Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2008. Soil Liquefaction during Earthquake. EERI Publication, Monograph MNO-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
431
Geotechnical Report Page 35
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Knudsen, K.l., et al., 2000, Preliminary Maps of Quaternary Deposits & Liquefaction Susceptibility, Nine- County San Francisco Bay Area, CA, OFR -00-444, U.S.

Geological Survey, Map Scale 1:275,000.

Majmundar, Hasmakhrai H., 1989, Landslide Hazards in the Vacaville Area, Solano County, California, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 14, California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, DMG, Open File Report 89-17, Map Scale 1:24,000.

Nilsen, T.H., 1975, Preliminary photointerpretation map of landslides and other surficial deposits of the Diablo 7.5 minute Quadrangle, Contra Costa County, California: U.S.

Geological Survey Open File Map 75-277-14, map scale 1:24000.

Page, B. M. (1992). Tectonic Setting of the San Francisco Bay Region, in Borchardt, Glenn, and others, eds. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Earthquake Hazards in the Eastern San Francisco Bay Area (pp. 1-7). California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 113.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2023, web soil survey website, http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app
U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed November 2022, at: https://www.usgs.gov/naturalhazards/earthquake-hazards/faults U.S. Geological Survey, 1997, Open File Report 97-745, San Francisco Bay region Landslide Folio - Summary of Distribution of Slides and Earth Flows in the San Francisco Bay Region, Ellen, Stephen, et. all.

Schlocker, J., 1971, Generalized geologic map of the San Francisco Bay region, California, Association of Bay Area Governments, Basic Data Contribution 8, Map Scale 1:500,000.

Wagner, J.R., 1978, Late Cenozoic history of the Coast Ranges East of San Francisco Bay, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 161 pp.

Wentworth, Carl M., et. all., 1997, Summary Distribution of Slides and Earth Flows in the San Francisco Bay region, California, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 97- 745-C. scale 1:62,500.
432 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report Page 36
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Witter, R.C., Knudsen, K.L, Sowers, J.M., Wentworth, C.M., Koehler, R.D., and Randolph, C. E., 2006, Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1037, scale 1:24,000 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1037/).

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2003, Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2003-214.

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2013, The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Version 3 (UCERF3) – Time Independent Model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013-1165.

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2014, Long-Term TimeDependent Probabilities for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3): Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
433
Vanden Rd
Vanden Rd
Peabody Rd
Leisure Town Rd
Canon Rd
Gate Rd
Meridian Rd
Peabody Rd
Noonan Ln
Ruby Dr
McCrory Rd
Fairfield
Vacaville
Vallejo
Fairfield
Vacaville
Oakland
Berkeley
Concord Antioch Richmond
San
Francisco
Santa
Rosa
\\haleyaldrich.com\share\granite\2022\220150-NCE-MattGarciaPark-Fairfield\GIS\ArcGIS\ArcGIS-220150-Fairfield-20230818-Update.aprx; 8/21/2023; pflores Phone: (925) 935-9771
www.caleng.com
Walnut Creek, CA, 94596
785 Ygnacio Valley Rd.
0207491-001 JANUARY 2024 FIGURE 1

SITE LOCATION MAP

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
APN 166-020-240

PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT
Site Location
0 0.25 0.5 1
MILES

STREET CENTERLINES FROM CALTRANS CALIFORNIA ROAD
SYSTEM, DOWNLOADED ON 18 FEB 2020.

ORTHOIMAGERY FROM ESRI (MAXAR), 2019.

BASEMAP REFERENCE

1. 2.

MAP

LOCATION
434 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
125
100
125
100
1 5 2
100
100
01 0
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
C-1
C-2
C-3
prx; 8/30/2023; pflores -Fairfield\GIS\ArcGIS\ArcGIS-220150-Fairfield-20230818-Update.a \\haleyaldrich.com\share\granite\2022\220150-NCE-MattGarciaPark 785 Ygnacio Valley Rd. Walnut Creek, CA, 94596 www.caleng.com Phone: (925) 935-9771 JANUARY 2024 0207491-001 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT 0 200 400 100
FEET
BASEMAP REFERENCE1.2.3.4.5.
5-FT CONTOURS FROM SOLANO COUNTY, 2016.PARCELS FROM SOLANO COUNTY GIS DATABASE, 2018.ORTHOIMAGERY FROM ESRI (MAXAR), 2019.SITE PLAN OVERLAY FROM EXTERNAL.RED LINE INDICATES SITE BOUNDARY.

Vanden Rd
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
435
Vanden Rd
Vanden Rd
Peabody Rd
Leisure Town Rd
Canon Rd
Gate Rd
Meridian Rd
Peabody Rd
Noonan Ln
Ruby Dr
McCrory Rd
af af
af
af
af
af af
af
af af
af
af af af af
af
af
af
af
af af
Ks
Ks
Ks
Ks Ks
Ks
Qha
Qha
Qha
Qha
Qha
Qha
Qpa
Qpa
Qpa
Qpa
Qpa
Tes Tes
Tes
Tes
Tes
Tpas
Tpas
\\haleyaldrich.com\share\granite\2022\220150-NCE-MattGarciaPark-Fairfield\GIS\ArcGIS\ArcGIS-220150-Fairfield-20230818-Update.aprx; 8/21/2023; pflores Phone: (925) 935-9771
www.caleng.com
Walnut Creek, CA, 94596
785 Ygnacio Valley Rd.
0207491-001 JANUARY 2024 FIGURE 3

REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAP

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
APN 166-020-240

PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT
Site Location
0 0.25 0.5 1
MILES
REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAP FROM GRAYMER, 2006.

BASEMAP REFERENCE

1. MAP UNIT DESCRIPTION
af
Qha
Qpa
Tps
Tes
Tpas
Ks
Placemark
AOI_1
Artificial Fill
Alluvium (Holocene)
Alluvium (Pleistocene)
Sedimentary rocks (Pliocene)
Sedimentary rocks (Eocene)
Sedimentary rocks (Paleocene)
Great Valley complex sedimentary rocks (Cretaceous)
436 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
DaC
DbC
Pc
CeB
DbC
SeA
DaE2
MmE
SeB
SeA
SeA
DbC
DaC
SeA
DbE
DaE2
Ca
MkA
SeA
Ca
DbE
DbE
AsA
SeA
DaC
Yr
DbE
MmE
BrA
DbC
Pc
RoA
AoA
Ca
CeB
MmE
SeA
SeA
Ca
MkA
MmE
DbC
\\haleyaldrich.com\share\granite\2022\220150-NCE-MattGarciaPark-Fairfield\GIS\ArcGIS\ArcGIS-220150-Fairfield-20230818-Update.aprx; 8/21/2023; pflores Phone: (925) 935-9771
www.caleng.com
Walnut Creek, CA, 94596
785 Ygnacio Valley Rd.
0207491-001 JANUARY 2024 FIGURE 4

NRCS SOIL MAP

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
APN 166-020-240

PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT
Site Location
0 0.13 0.25 0.5
MILES

SOIL DATA FROM NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE,
US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; WEB SOIL SURVEY, ACCESSED ONLINE ON 6/29/2020.

BASEMAP REFERENCE

1. MAP UNIT DESCRIPTION
Yr
SeB
SeA
RoA
Pc
DaC
CeB
Ca
AsA
AoA Antioch-San Ysidro complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Antioch-San Ysidro complex, thick surface, 0 to 2 percent slopes Capay silty clay loam, 0 percent slopes, MLRA 17
Clear Lake clay, drained, 2 to 5 percent slopes, MLRA 15 Diablo-Ayar clays, 2 to 9 percent slopes
DaE2 Diablo-Ayar clays, 9 to 30 percent slopes, eroded
DbC Dibble-Los Osos loams, 2 to 9 percent slopes
DbE Dibble-Los Osos loams, 9 to 30 percent slopes Yolo loam, clay substratum San Ysidro sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes
San Ysidro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Rincon clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slope
Pescadero silty clay loam, 0 percent slopes, MLRA 17
MmE
MkA
Millsholm loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, MLRA 15
Millsap sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
437
Green Valley Fault
Midland Fault Zone
Great Valley Thrust Fault System
Rio Vista Fault
Lagoon Val
ley Fault
Cordelia
Fault Zone
Fairfield
Vacaville
\\haleyaldrich.com\share\granite\2022\220150-NCE-MattGarciaPark-Fairfield\GIS\ArcGIS\ArcGIS-220150-Fairfield-20230818-Update.aprx; 8/21/2023; pflores Phone: (925) 935-9771
www.caleng.com
Walnut Creek, CA, 94596
785 Ygnacio Valley Rd.
0207491-001 JANUARY 2024 FIGURE 5

FAULT ACTIVITY MAP

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
APN 166-020-240

PROPOSED MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT
Site Location
0 1.5 3 6
MILES

FAULT LOCATIONS FROM US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUATERNARY
FAULTS AND FOLDS DATABASE, ACCESSED ONLINE ON 30 JULY 2021.

BASEMAP REFERENCE

1. MAP UNIT DESCRIPTION
historical (<150 years), well constrained
location
historical (<150 years), moderately
constrained location
historical (<150 years), inferred location
latest Quaternary (<15,000 years), well
constrained location
latest Quaternary (<15,000 years),
moderately constrained location
latest Quaternary (<15,000 years),
inferred location
late Quaternary (<130,000 years), well
constrained location
late Quaternary (<130,000 years),
moderately constrained location
late Quaternary (<130,000 years),
inferred location
middle and late Quaternary (<750,000
years), well constrained location
middle and late quaternary (<750,000
years), moderately constrained location
middle and late Quaternary (<750,000
years), inferred location
undifferentiated Quaternary(<1.6 million
years), well constrained location
undifferentiated Quaternary(<1.6 million
years), moderately constrained location
undifferentiated Quaternary(<1.6 million
years), inferred location
Class B (various age), well constrained
location
Class B (various age), moderately
constrained location
Class B (various age), inferred location
438 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Geotechnical Report
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Appendix A. Boring Log and Lab Test Data
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
439
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield

ABBREVIATIONS
TV
PID
UC
ppm
-
-
-
-

TORVANE

PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION

PARTS PER MILLION
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
PLASTIC INDEX (%)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY (PCF)

NON PLASTIC
PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE

POCKET PENETROMETER (TSF)
LL
PI
W
DD
NP
-200
PP
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
California Modified Sampler
Standard Penetration Test

LITHOLOGIC SYMBOLS SAMPLER SYMBOLS
(Unified Soil Classification System)
BEDROCK: Bedrock
CH: USCS High Plasticity Clay
CL: USCS Low Plasticity Clay
CL-ML: USCS Low Plasticity Silty Clay
ML: USCS Silt
SM: USCS Silty Sand
TOPSOIL: Topsoil

WELL CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS

KEY TO SYMBOLS
Water Level at Time
Drilling, or as Shown
Water Level After 24
Hours, or as Shown
Water Level at End of
Drilling, or as Shown
440 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
6-8-11
3-4-5
6-9-13
5-6-9
10-9-12
5-7-9
24-50/5"
10-9-13
21-43-
50/5"
42-50/4"
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
CM
CM
CM
SPT
SPT
46 21 25
24 24
20 21
103
103
110
108

2.5 3.5

3.5 3

2.5 1.25
3 0.25
1 1
2 3
6 in. TOPSOIL
Fat CLAY (CH), brown, moist, firm to hard (OLDER ALLUVIUM) Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, moist, hard, mottled black, intermixed gray-brown clay, trace fine angular weathered gravel Sandy Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, moist to wet, soft to hard, fine grained
CLAYSTONE, very dark gray, moist, soft, highly weathered (BEDROCK) Bottom of borehole at 30.9 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/19/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.9483307
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING ---
GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING 16.0 ft / Elev 73.0 ft
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 89 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/19/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.30697981

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-1
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
441
3-8-10
5-3-4
3-4-8
4-5-6
9-12-16
4-5-6
7-8-10
5-6-8
7-6-7
27-50
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
CM
CM
CM
53 31
15 20
23 27
32 24
24 4.5
2 4

4.5 2

2.5 3.5
2 1
9 in. TOPSOIL
Fat CLAY (CH), brown to dark brown, dry, hard (OLDER ALLUVIUM) Sandy Lean CLAY (CL), brown, moist, firm, mottled black, interbedded clayey sand, fine grained
Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, moist, firm to hard, mottled black, intermixed gray clay, few fine angular weathered gravel Lean CLAY (CL), brown to light brown, moist, firm
Silty SAND (SM), brown, moist to wet, medium dense, fine grained Lean CLAY (CL), gray to gray-brown, moist, hard
CLAYSTONE, very dark gray, moist, soft, highly weathered (BEDROCK) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/20/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.9477446
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING 5.0 ft / Elev 80.0 ft

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING --- N/A
GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING 14.0 ft / Elev 71.0 ft
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 85 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/20/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.3082162

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-2
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
442 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
3-5-7
5-6-6
5-8-11
4-4-7
4-8-7
4-5-6
5-5-7
4-3-4
4-3-4
6-5-6
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
CM
CM
CM
45 27 18
15 27
32 34
28 30
79 91
90 100
96 2
2 1.5

1.5 0.5

0.5 0.75
0 0
0 12 in. TOPSOIL
Lean CLAY to SILT (CL-ML), brown, dry, firm (OLDER ALLUVIUM) Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, moist, firm, mottled black, trace weathered fine angular gravel, intermixed gray-brown clay Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, moist, soft to firm, mottled black, trace weathered fine angular gravel, intermixed gray-brown clay Lean CLAY (CL), brown, moist, soft
SILT with sand (ML), olive-brown, moist to wet, very soft, fine grained Bottom of borehole at 31.5 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/20/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.949236
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING ---
GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING 7.0 ft / Elev 79.0 ft
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 86 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/20/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.306756

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-3
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
443
3-10-10
10-8-8
4-7-9
4-5-7
3-5-7
2-3-4
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
46 18 28
10 89 34

4.5 2

0.5 2.25
6 in. TOPSOIL
Fat CLAY (CH), dark brown, dry to moist, hard (OLDER ALLUVIUM) Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown, firm, mottled black, trace fine angular weathered gravel
Lean CLAY (CL), yellow-brown, moist, soft to firm, mottled black, intermixed gray-brown clay
Bottom of borehole at 11.0 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/19/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.9506344
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING 6.0 ft / Elev 85.0 ft

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING --- N/A

GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING ---
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 91 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/19/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.30806031

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-4
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
444 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
3-5-7
8-7-7
4-8-12
5-6-7
9-12-15
5-3-4
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
SPT 23
15 24
26 104
100

4.5 3.5

2.5 3.5

2.5 0.25
6 in. TOPSOIL
Fat CLAY (CH), brown, dry, hard (OLDER ALLUVIUM)
Fat CLAY (CH), brown to yellow-brown, firm to hard, mottled black, trace fine angular weathered gravel
Lean CLAY (CL), brown to yellow-brown moist, soft, interbedded sandy clay and clayey sand, fine grained
Bottom of borehole at 11.0 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/19/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.947638
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING ---
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 90 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/19/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.30828718

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-5
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
445
3-5-8
5-5-5
5-8-13
4-6-8
8-12-14
5-6-7
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
CM
SPT
49 30 19
21 25
109
103
3 2
4 3
6 in. TOPSOIL
Fat CLAY (CH), brown, dry to moist, hard (OLDER ALLUVIUM) SILT (ML) , brown, dry to moist, firm
Lean CLAY (CL), brown, to yellow-brown, moist, firm to hard, mottled black
Bottom of borehole at 11.0 ft. Borehole backfilled with neat cement grout.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR Geo Ex Subsurface Exploration
COMPLETED 7/19/2023
LOGGED BY A.Carreira CHECKED BY D. Burger
DATUM WGS84
LONGITUDE -121.9498681
HOLE SIZE 4 in.

GROUNDWATER AT END OF DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AFTER DRILLING ---

GROUNDWATER AT TIME OF DRILLING ---
HAMMER TYPE 140 lb hammer with 30 in. autotrip
GROUND ELEVATION 88 ft
DRILLING RIG/METHOD Diedrich D70-Turbo/Solid Flight Auger DATE STARTED 7/19/2023
COORDINATES: LATITUDE 38.30561269

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
BLOW
COUNTS

SAMPLE TYPE
(FIELD VALUE)

GRAPHIC
LOG

PLASTICITY
INDEX (%)

PLASTIC
LIMIT (%)
LIQUID
LIMIT (%)

FINES CONTENT
(%)

MOISTURE
DRY UNIT WT.

CONTENT (%)
(pcf)
POCKET PEN.
(tsf)

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(ft)
0 5
10 PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER B-6
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
446 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
B-1 4.5 8/16/2023 46 21 25
B-1 8.5 8/16/2023 23.6 102.5
B-1 15.5 8/16/2023 24.3 103.1
B-1 20.5 8/16/2023 20.2 110.2
B-1 25.5 8/16/2023 21.4 107.7
B-2 0.5 8/16/2023 15.3
B-2 4.5 8/16/2023 19.8
B-2 5.5 8/16/2023 9.5 53
B-2 8.5 8/16/2023 23.0
B-2 16.0 8/16/2023 27.4
B-2 20.5 8/16/2023 31.9
B-2 25.0 8/16/2023 4.75 31
B-2 25.5 8/16/2023 24.1
B-2 31.0 8/16/2023 23.9
B-3 0.5 8/16/2023 15.3
B-3 1.5 8/16/2023 45 27 18
B-3 9.0 8/16/2023 27.1 79.0
B-3 15.5 8/16/2023 32.3 91.3
B-3 20.5 8/16/2023 34.4 89.9
B-3 25.5 8/16/2023 27.5 100.3
B-3 31.0 8/16/2023 29.7 96.4
B-4 0.5 8/16/2023 9.6
B-4 1.5 8/16/2023 46 18 28
B-4 8.5 8/16/2023 34.5 88.6
B-5 0.5 8/16/2023 14.7
B-5 4.5 8/16/2023 24.1 103.6
B-5 8.5 8/16/2023 25.9 100.1
B-5 9.5 8/16/2023 2.36 23
B-6 1.5 8/16/2023 49 30 19
B-6 4.5 8/16/2023 20.5 109.4
B-6 8.0 8/16/2023 25.0 103.1
Saturation
(%)
Void
Ratio
Classification
Water
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
PAGE 1 OF 1
%<#200
Sieve
Plasticity
Index
Plastic
Limit
Liquid
Limit
Date
Tested
Maximum
Screen
Size (mm)
Borehole Depth
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
447
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 0 20 40 60 80 100
B-1
B-3
B-4
B-6

P
L
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y
I
N
D
E
X

LIQUID LIMIT
46 45
46 49
21 27
18 30
25 18
28 19
PIPLLL Fines Classification
ML

BOREHOLE DEPTH

4.5 1.5

1.5 1.5
8/16/2023
8/16/2023
8/16/2023
8/16/2023
Date Tested

ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS
CL CH

MH CL-ML
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
448 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
LL PL PI Cc Cu

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
coarse SILT OR CLAYmedium fine

0.5 0.0

0.149 0.0
%Silt %Clay
3 100

B-2
B-2
B-5
24 16 30

1 6 10 200

BOREHOLE DEPTH
8/16/2023
8/16/2023
8/16/2023
B-2
B-2
B-5
1/2 50

46.5 68.5

76.8 D60 D30 D10

0.129

0.153

0.24 D100
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 6 3 1.5 3/4 3/8 4 8 14 20 40 60 140

PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT

COBBLES GRAVEL

52.9 31.5

23.2 SAND

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
coarse fine

5.5 25.0

9.5 Classification

5.5 25.0

9.5 BOREHOLE DEPTH DATE TESTED
%Gravel

9.5 4.75

2.36 %Sand
CLIENT City of Fairfield
PROJECT NUMBER 207491
PROJECT NAME Matt Garcia Community Park
PROJECT LOCATION Vanden Rd, Fairfield
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
449
CTL # 715-065 Date: 8/22/2023 Tested By: PJ Checked: PJ Client: Haley & Aldrich Project: Matt Garcia Community Park Proj. No: 207491 Remarks:

Chloride pH ORP Moisture
Boring Sample, No. Depth, ft. As Rec. Minimum Saturated mg/kg mg/kg % (Redox) At Test Soil Visual Description Dry Wt. Dry Wt. Dry Wt. mv %
ASTM G57 Cal 643 ASTM G57 Cal 422-mod. Cal 417-mod. Cal 417-mod. Cal 643 SM 2580B ASTM D2216 B01 1-3 8.0 - 774 - 51 144 0.0144 8.4 - 5.6 Brown CLAY w/ SandB03 3-3 4.0 - 582 - 93 678 0.0678 8.5 - 5.3 Olive Brown CLAY w/ Sand, trace Gravel Resistivity @ 15.5 oC (Ohm-cm) Sample Location or ID Sulfate Corrosivity Test Summary
450 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Boring: B1+B6 Reduced By: RU
Sample: Checked By: PJ
Depth: 1-10 Date: 8/22/2023
ABCDE
170 80 50
607 353 217
7628 4436 2727

2.60 2.60 2.58
000
128 140 146

3.18 4.00 4.40
16 8 5
17 9 5

21.8 24.7 27.1
127.8 122.6 119.7
104.9 98.3 94.2
Specimen Designation
Corrected R-Value
Moisture Content (%)
Wet Density (pcf)
Dry Density (pcf)
Exudation Load (lbf)
Height After Compaction (in)
Stabilometer @ 2000
Turns Displacement
R-value
Exudation Pressure (psi)
Expansion Pressure (psf)
Compactor Foot Pressure (psi)
R-Value
CTM 301
CTL Job No.:

Client:

Project Number:
715-065
Haley & Aldrich
207491
7 0
Soil Description:

Remarks:

Project Name: Matt Garcia Community Park
Brown CLAY w/ Sand R-Value
Expansion
Pressure
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Exudation Pressure vs R‐Value
Exudation Pressure vs. Expansion
Pressure
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
451
Geotechnical Report
Matt Garcia Community Park, Fairfield, CA 3 January 2024 Pragmatic Expertise™
Appendix B. CPT Data
452 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
CPT Data Report
Geo-Ex Subsurface Exploration
Dixon, CA
Date: August 11, 2023
CPT Report 023-001-11
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
453
CPT Report 023-001-11 CPT Data Report Page 2 of 16

1. Introduction
This report has been prepared by Geo-Ex Subsurface Exploration on August 11, 2023. It contains the data of cone penetration tests at Matt Garcia Park in Fairfield, CA using the CPeT-it software (version 3.9.3.4).

Geo-Ex Subsurface Exploration is a registered California Small Business Enterprise (Micro Business), located in Dixon, CA, providing among others CPT services to the geotechnical, environmental and construction industries.

Our corporate goal is to provide quality services as well as innovative solutions for our clients ever changing needs. We are also committed to providing cost-effective solutions, quality project management, schedule control and ensuring that all services are in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements.

For more information, including a more complete listing of the services we can provide, please visit our website (www.geoexsubsurface.com) and for clarifications or additional information please contact our offices:

Tom Scott
Geo-Ex Subsubsurface Exploration
1510 Madera Dr.

Dixon, CA 95620
Ph: (916) 799-8198
WARNING:

Geo-Ex Subsubsurface Exploration uses a commercial CPT interpretation and plotting software CPeT-IT (https://geologismiki.gr/products/cpet-it/). The software takes the CPT data and performs basic interpretation in terms of soil behavior type (SBT) and various geotechnical parameters using current published empirical correlations based on the comprehensive review by Lunne, Robertson and Powell (1997) and updated by Robertson and Cabal (2015). The interpretation is presented in tabular format. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use and should be carefully reviewed. Geo-Ex Subsubsurface does not warranty the correctness or the applicability of any of the geotechnical parameters interpreted by the software and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used in the software.
454 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
CPT Report 023-001-11 CPT Data Report Page 3 of 16

2. Project Location
Geo-Ex Subsubsurface Exploration has performed cone penetration tests at the Matt Garcia Field in Fairfield, CA.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
455
CPT Report 023-001-11 CPT Data Report Page 4 of 16

3. General Project Information
Operator name (or initials) Nick Maher & Casey Finch
Project designation Matt Garcia Field, Fairfield, CA
Ground surface elevation 0 ft
Ground water surface elevation this was not confirmed during the testing; therefore all plots have been generated
assuming an elevation of 0 ft;
Sounding locations C-1, C-2 and C-3
Sounding date July 21, 2023
Equipment Used
Cone manufacturer Vertek
Cone type used 15 cm2 piezocone
Cone serial number 4444.268
Type of thrust machine 30 kN pusher
Method used to provide reaction force vehicle dead weight Location and type of friction reduction system none
Calibration data To be provided
Any special difficulties or other observations concerning performance of the equipment none
Information on other sensing devices used during the sounding N/A
Any observations concerning the quality of the recorded data N/A
456 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
CPT Report 023-001-11 CPT Plots Page 5 of 16

4. CPT Plots
CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
457
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex SubsurfaceGeotechnical - EnvironmentalDixon, CAhttp://www.geoexsubsurface.com Total depth: 42.74 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-1
Location:

SBT Index
Ic SBT
4 3 2 1
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
SBT Index Cone resistance qt
Tip resistance (tsf)
200 100
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Cone resistance qt Pore pressure u
Pressure (psi)
500 0
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Pore pressure u
Diss.

SBT legend

1. Sensitive fine grained2. Organic material3. Clay to silty clay

4. Clayey silt to silty clay5. Silty sand to sandy silt6. Clean sand to silty sand

7. Gravely sand to sand8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand9. Very stiff fine grained Friction ratio
Rf (%)
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Friction ratio Soil Behaviour Type
SBT (Robertson, 2010)
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Soil Behaviour Type
Silty sand & sandy siltClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty claySilty sand & sandy siltSand & silty sand CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM 6Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt 458 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex Subsurface
Geotechnical - Environmental
Dixon, CA
http://www.geoexsubsurface.com
Total depth: 42.74 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-1
Location:

CPTU
Borehole
Depth
(ft) (t50)0.50 t50
(s)
t50
(years) G/Su
ch
(ft2/s)
ch
(ft2/year)
Tabular results
Dissipation Tests Results
Dissipation tests consists of stopping the piezocone penetration and observing porepressures (u) with elapsed time (t).

The data are automatic recorded by the field computer and should take place until a minimum of 50% dissipation.

The porepressures are plotted as a function of square root of (t). The graphical technique suggested by Robertson and Campanella (1989), yields a value for t50, which corresponds to the time for 50% consolidation.

The value of the coefficient of consolidation in the radial or horizontal direction ch was then calculated by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory using the following equation:
50 0.5
r
2 h t
T r I
c   
where:

T: time factor given by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory corresponding to the porepressure position r: piezocone radius
Ir: stiffness index, equal to shear modulus G divided by the undrained strength of clay (Su). t50: time corresponding to 50% consolidation
Dissipation tests
Permeability estimates based on dissipation test
The dissipation of pore pressures during a CPTu dissipation test is controlled by the coefficient of consolidation in the horizontal direction (ch) which is influenced by a combination of the soil permeability (kh) and compressibility (M), as defined by the following:
kh  ch  γw /M
where: M is the 1-D constrained modulus and γw is the unit weight of water, in compatible units.

M
(tsf)
kh
(ft/s)
C-1 40.43 0.0 0 0.00E+000 100.00 0.00E+000 0 1555.66 -1.00E+004 7 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
459
This software is licensed to: Eijkelkamp North America CPT name: C-1 Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-1
Depth: 40.43 (ft)
t^0.50 (s^0.50)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Porepressure u2 (psi)
135
130
125
120
115
110
105
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 30
25 20
15 10
5 0
Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-1
Depth: 40.43 (ft)
u0 = 17.53 (psi)
Pore pressure
Pressure (psi)
0 Depth (ft) 42
40 38
36 34
32 30
28 26
24 22
20 18
16 14
12 10
8 6
4 2
0 u2 penetration
Initial dissipation
End of dissipation (extrapolated)
Initial estimated at t=0
Pore pressure
8 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM 460 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex SubsurfaceGeotechnical - EnvironmentalDixon, CAhttp://www.geoexsubsurface.com Total depth: 42.14 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-2
Location:

SBT Index
Ic SBT
4 3 2 1
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
SBT Index Cone resistance qt
Tip resistance (tsf)
100
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Cone resistance qt Pore pressure u
Pressure (psi)
200 0
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Pore pressure u
Diss.

SBT legend

1. Sensitive fine grained2. Organic material3. Clay to silty clay

4. Clayey silt to silty clay5. Silty sand to sandy silt6. Clean sand to silty sand

7. Gravely sand to sand8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand9. Very stiff fine grained Friction ratio
Rf (%)
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
Friction ratio Soil Behaviour Type
SBT (Robertson, 2010)
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Depth (ft)
1012141618202224262830323436384042
02468
Soil Behaviour Type
Silty sand & sandy siltClay & silty claySilty sand & sandy siltClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty claySilty sand & sandy siltVery stiff sand/clayey sandSilty sand & sandy siltSand & silty sand CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM 9Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
461
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex Subsurface
Geotechnical - Environmental
Dixon, CA
http://www.geoexsubsurface.com
Total depth: 42.14 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-2
Location:

CPTU
Borehole
Depth
(ft) (t50)0.50 t50
(s)
t50
(years) G/Su
ch
(ft2/s)
ch
(ft2/year)
Tabular results
Dissipation Tests Results
Dissipation tests consists of stopping the piezocone penetration and observing porepressures (u) with elapsed time (t).

The data are automatic recorded by the field computer and should take place until a minimum of 50% dissipation.

The porepressures are plotted as a function of square root of (t). The graphical technique suggested by Robertson and Campanella (1989), yields a value for t50, which corresponds to the time for 50% consolidation.

The value of the coefficient of consolidation in the radial or horizontal direction ch was then calculated by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory using the following equation:
50 0.5
r
2 h t
T r I
c   
where:

T: time factor given by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory corresponding to the porepressure position r: piezocone radius
Ir: stiffness index, equal to shear modulus G divided by the undrained strength of clay (Su). t50: time corresponding to 50% consolidation
Dissipation tests
Permeability estimates based on dissipation test
The dissipation of pore pressures during a CPTu dissipation test is controlled by the coefficient of consolidation in the horizontal direction (ch) which is influenced by a combination of the soil permeability (kh) and compressibility (M), as defined by the following:
kh  ch  γw /M
where: M is the 1-D constrained modulus and γw is the unit weight of water, in compatible units.

M
(tsf)
kh
(ft/s)
C-2 41.98 0.0 0 0.00E+000 100.00 0.00E+000 0 163.20 -1.00E+004 10 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM 462 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
This software is licensed to: Eijkelkamp North America CPT name: C-2 Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-2
Depth: 41.98 (ft)
t^0.50 (s^0.50)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Porepressure u2 (psi)
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80 60
40 20
Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-2
Depth: 41.98 (ft)
u0 = 18.20 (psi)
Pore pressure
Pressure (psi)
0 Depth (ft) 42
40 38
36 34
32 30
28 26
24 22
20 18
16 14
12 10
8 6
4 2
0 u2 penetration
Initial dissipation
End of dissipation (extrapolated)
Initial estimated at t=0
Pore pressure
11 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:32 PM CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
463
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex SubsurfaceGeotechnical - EnvironmentalDixon, CAhttp://www.geoexsubsurface.com Total depth: 41.11 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-3
Location:

SBT Index
Ic SBT
4 3 2 1
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
SBT Index Cone resistance qt
Tip resistance (tsf)
200 100
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
Cone resistance qt Pore pressure u
Pressure (psi)
200 100 0
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
Pore pressure u
Diss.

SBT legend

1. Sensitive fine grained2. Organic material3. Clay to silty clay

4. Clayey silt to silty clay5. Silty sand to sandy silt6. Clean sand to silty sand

7. Gravely sand to sand8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand9. Very stiff fine grained Friction ratio
Rf (%)
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
Friction ratio Soil Behaviour Type
SBT (Robertson, 2010)
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Depth (ft)
10121416182022242628303234363840
02468
Soil Behaviour Type
Silty sand & sandy siltSilty sand & sandy siltClayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClay & silty clayClayClayVery stiff fine grainedVery stiff sand/clayey sandSilty sand & sandy siltVery stiff sand/clayey sandSand & silty sand CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:33 PM 12Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt 464 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F
Project: Matt Garcia Park
Geo-Ex Subsurface
Geotechnical - Environmental
Dixon, CA
http://www.geoexsubsurface.com
Total depth: 41.11 ft, Date: 7/21/2023
Surface Elevation: 0.00 ft
Fairfield, CA
Coords: X:0.00, Y:0.00
Cone Type:

Cone Operator:

CPT: C-3
Location:

CPTU
Borehole
Depth
(ft) (t50)0.50 t50
(s)
t50
(years) G/Su
ch
(ft2/s)
ch
(ft2/year)
Tabular results
Dissipation Tests Results
Dissipation tests consists of stopping the piezocone penetration and observing porepressures (u) with elapsed time (t).

The data are automatic recorded by the field computer and should take place until a minimum of 50% dissipation.

The porepressures are plotted as a function of square root of (t). The graphical technique suggested by Robertson and Campanella (1989), yields a value for t50, which corresponds to the time for 50% consolidation.

The value of the coefficient of consolidation in the radial or horizontal direction ch was then calculated by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory using the following equation:
50 0.5
r
2 h t
T r I
c   
where:

T: time factor given by Houlsby and Teh's (1988) theory corresponding to the porepressure position r: piezocone radius
Ir: stiffness index, equal to shear modulus G divided by the undrained strength of clay (Su). t50: time corresponding to 50% consolidation
Dissipation tests
Permeability estimates based on dissipation test
The dissipation of pore pressures during a CPTu dissipation test is controlled by the coefficient of consolidation in the horizontal direction (ch) which is influenced by a combination of the soil permeability (kh) and compressibility (M), as defined by the following:
kh  ch  γw /M
where: M is the 1-D constrained modulus and γw is the unit weight of water, in compatible units.

M
(tsf)
kh
(ft/s)
C-3 41.07 0.0 0 0.00E+000 100.00 0.00E+000 0 229.22 -1.00E+004 13 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:33 PM CITY OF FAIRFIELD | FUTURE FAIRFIELD FUN
Geotechnical Report
465
This software is licensed to: Eijkelkamp North America CPT name: C-3 Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-3
Depth: 41.07 (ft)
t^0.50 (s^0.50)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Porepressure u2 (psi)
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 30
25 20
Piezocone Dissipation Test: C-3
Depth: 41.07 (ft)
u0 = 17.81 (psi)
Pore pressure
Pressure (psi)
0 Depth (ft) 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 8
6 4
2 0
u2 penetration
Initial dissipation
End of dissipation (extrapolated)
Initial estimated at t=0
Pore pressure
14 Project file: D:\VMS - Eijkelkamp\Reports\CPT 023-001-10\Fairfield.cpt CPeT-IT v.3.9.3.4 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 8/8/2023, 3:15:33 PM 466 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX F

MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN
EIR Memorandum
467

APPENDIX G
The EIR memorandum for Matt
Garcia Community Park was
conducted by NCE. Provided in this
appendix is the complete project
consistency checklist for this project.
468 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
Addendum to the
Fairfield Train Station Specific Plan
Program Environmental Impact Report (SP EIR)
Project Consistency Checklist
Prepared for
City of Fairfield
Public Works Department
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield California 94533
Prepared by
NCE Inc.
1003 Cutting Blvd, Suite 110
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
DECEMBER 2023
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 469

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE OF THE CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST ...................................................................................................1 SITE INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................................3 A PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................4

1. Project Overview ..............................................................................................................................4

2. Project Location................................................................................................................................4

3. Existing Setting.................................................................................................................................4

4. Project Objectives.............................................................................................................................7

5. SP Prior Approvals ...........................................................................................................................7

6. Summary of Findings........................................................................................................................8 B EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .......................................................................................9

1. Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................................12

2. Agriculture and Forestry .................................................................................................................15

3. Air Quality .......................................................................................................................................17

4. Biological Resources ......................................................................................................................20

5. Cultural Resources .........................................................................................................................24

6. Energy ............................................................................................................................................27

7. Geology and Soils ..........................................................................................................................29

8. Greenhouse Gas ............................................................................................................................33

9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................35

10. Hydrology and Water Quality..........................................................................................................39

11. Land Use and Planning ..................................................................................................................44

12. Mineral resources ...........................................................................................................................46

13. Noise...............................................................................................................................................48

14. Population and Housing .................................................................................................................52

15. Public Services ...............................................................................................................................54

16. Recreation ......................................................................................................................................57

17. Transportation.................................................................................................................................59

18. Tribal Cultural Resouces ................................................................................................................64

19. Utilities and Service Systems .........................................................................................................67

20. Wildfire............................................................................................................................................71

21. Mandatory Findings of Significance ...............................................................................................73 DETERMINATION....................................................................................................................................................77 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (PERSONS/DEPARTMENTS CONSULTED) .....................................77 Appendices
Appendix A Matt Garcia Park Lighting Plan Photometric Analysis Appendix B Traffic Impact Memorandum
Appendix C Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Figures
Figure 1 Project Vicinity ..............................................................................................................................................5 Figure 2 Project Site Location and SP Land Use Map ...............................................................................................6 Figure 3 Preferred Design Concept............................................................................................................................8 470 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 1

PURPOSE OF THE CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST
dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝƐƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞ͕ƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůYƵĂůŝƚLJĐƚ
;
YͿ 'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϴϯ͕ǁŚĞƚŚĞƌ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƚŚĂƚŝƐ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ;ŝƚLJͿ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ dƌĂŝŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐWůĂŶ ;^WͿŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W WƌŽŐƌĂŵ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚZĞƉŽƌƚ;^W
/ZͿ͘
^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJ͕ ƚŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚ ƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞǁŚĞƚŚĞƌ ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚDĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ;ƉƌŽũĞĐƚͿŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ƉĂƌŬŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚ ŝŶƚŚĞ ^W /Z ĂŶĚƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐ
ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ ĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘ 
YƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĂƚĂůůƐƚĂƚĞĂŶĚůŽĐĂůŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞƐŽĨ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŽǀĞƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞĚŝƐĐƌĞƚŝŽŶĂƌLJĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJďĞĨŽƌĞĂĐƚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚŽƐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ dŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝƐĨŽƌ Y
ƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐŽŶůLJ ĂŶĚĨƵůĨŝůůƐ
YĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘dŚŝƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƚŽƐĂƚŝƐĨLJ
Y;WƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞ͕^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϭϬϬϬĞƚƐĞƋ͘ͿĂŶĚ Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ;ϭϰZϭϱϬϬϬĞƚ
ƐĞƋ͘Ϳ͘
dŚĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĂƌĞƚŚŽƐĞƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z ĂŶĚĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚƉƉĞŶĚŝdž'ŽĨ
ƚŚĞ
Y 'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĂWƌŽŐƌĂŵ /ZĂƌĞĞůŝŐŝďůĞĨŽƌ
YƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶŝŶŐ͕ĂƐ
ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚďĞůŽǁ͘ŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŚĞƌĞŝŶǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĞŝƚŚĞƌ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƚŚĂƚƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ
YƌĞǀŝĞǁŝƐŶŽƚǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĞĚŽƌĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƚĞƚŚĞďĂƐŝƐĨŽƌĐŽŶĚƵĐƚŝŶŐƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁ͘
WƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϭϭϲϲĂŶĚ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐϭϱϭϲϮƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϭϱϭϲϰ ƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚƚŚĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĨŽƌĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝĨĂŶLJ͕ƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚǁŚĞŶ ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ
/ZĐŽǀĞƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚ ƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚĚŝƐĐƌĞƚŝŽŶĂƌLJĂĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘/Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕WƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϭϬϴϯ͘ϯĂŶĚ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϭϱϭϴϯƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚ

YƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚ ĂĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞĨŽƌĂƉĂƌĐĞůĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚĂŶ /ZĨŽƌĂnjŽŶŝŶŐŽƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ŝĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞnjŽŶŝŶŐŽƌƉůĂŶ͘ /ĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ njŽŶŝŶŐŽƌƉůĂŶ͕ĂŶLJĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƵƉŽŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚ ĂƌĞƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚ ǁŚŝĐŚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚĂƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌ /Z͕ ŽƌǁŚĞŶƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĂƚ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁŝůůďĞŵŽƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚŚĂŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌ /Z͘
ĨĨĞĐƚƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞ
ƉĂƌĐĞůŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝĨƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJĂƉƉůŝĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ǁĞƌĞĨŽƵŶĚƚŽƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞƚŚĂƚĞĨĨĞĐƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
dŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚƌĞůŝĞƐŽŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚ^W /ZĂŶĚƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJ
ƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂŶŽŶ ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ͘DĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ^W͘dŚĞ^W ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • &ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚdƌĂŝŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐWůĂŶ͕ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůŽŶ:ƵŶĞϮϲ͕ ϮϬϭϭ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂŵĞŶĚĞĚŽŶƉƌŝůϯ͕ϮϬϭϮ͕ĂŶĚƵŐƵƐƚϮϭ͕ϮϬϭϮ ;^W
/ZͿ͘
• ƌĂĨƚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚZĞƉŽƌƚĨŽƌƚŚĞ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚdƌĂŝŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐWůĂŶ͕^ƚĂƚĞůĞĂƌŝŶŐŚŽƵƐĞη ϮϬϭϬϬϰϮϬϵϯ͕ĚĂƚĞĚĞĐĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϬ͕ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŽŶ:ƵůLJϮϲ͕ϮϬϭϭ͘ • WĂƌƚŝĂůůLJZĞĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚĞĚƌĂĨƚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚZĞƉŽƌƚĨŽƌƚŚĞ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚdƌĂŝŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐWůĂŶ͕ ^ƚĂƚĞůĞĂƌŝŶŐŚŽƵƐĞηϮϬϭϬϬϰϮϬϵϯ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϬϭϭ͘
• 
Y&ŝŶĚŝŶŐƐŽĨ&ĂĐƚĂŶĚ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨKǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚdƌĂŝŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐWůĂŶ ;ƉƉĞŶĚŝdžŽĨƚŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚͿ͘
• /ŶĐŝĚĞŶƚĂůdĂŬĞWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• ŝŽůŽŐŝĐĂůKƉŝŶŝŽŶ/ƐƐƵĞĚϮϬϭϳĨŽƌĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• ĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶϰϬϭĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ– ZĞƉŽƌƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 471
City of Fairfield
2 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
• ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ^ƚƵĚLJĨŽƌĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• ůĞĂŶtĂƚĞƌĐƚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰϬϭtĂƚĞƌYƵĂůŝƚLJĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚKƌĚĞƌ͘ • &ŝŶĂůh^ƌŵLJŽƌƉƐͲϰϬϰWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• :ƵŶĞϮϬϭϴƵƉĚĂƚĞĚϮϬϭϴĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ/dWͲWĞƌŵŝƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • KŶĞ>ĂŬĞ,ŽůĚŝŶŐ>>Ͳ /dWĨƌŽŵ&t͘
• ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϲ^,WKůĞƚƚĞƌ:ƵůLJϮϬϭϳ͘
&ŽƌƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͕ƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞĐŽůůĞĐƚŝǀĞůLJƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚƚŽĂƐƚŚĞ^W /Z͘
E
ĂůƐŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĂWŚĂƐĞ/
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ;WŚĂƐĞ/
^ͿĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ
ƉĞƌ^W
/ZŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ ;DDƐͿ͘ƐŝƚĞǀŝƐŝƚǁĂƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚŽŶ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϬ͕ϮϬϮϮ͕ƚŽĂƐƐĞƐƐƚŚĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ ƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽĨZĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ;Z
ƐͿ͘ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ǁĂƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ&ĞŚƌΘWĞĞƌƐĂŶĚĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϮ͕ϮϬϮϯ͘ƉŚŽƚŽŵĞƚƌŝĐƐƚƵĚLJǁĂƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ>ŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ ZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐ͕/ŶĐ͕͘ĂŶĚĚĂƚĞĚDĂLJϭϲ͕ϮϬϮϯ͘
dŚĞ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŚĞƌĞŝŶǁŝůůƐĞƌǀĞĂƐƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞƚŚĂƚƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ YƌĞǀŝĞǁŝƐŽƌŝƐŶŽƚ
ǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĞĚ͘KŶĐĞĨŝŶĂůŝnjĞĚ͕ƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚǁŝůůďĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĞŶƚŝƚůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƐƚĂĨĨƌĞƉŽƌƚĨŽƌ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂŶĚͬŽƌŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝů͘ ŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŵĂLJůĞĂĚƚŽĂ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W /Z͕ŽƌƚŚĂƚŝƚŝŶǀŽůǀĞƐƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌŽƌƐƉĞĐŝĂů
ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͕ĨŽƌĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ĂĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƚŚĂƚǁĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶŽƌŝƐŶŽƚĨƵůůLJĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W͘/Ŷ ƚŚĞƐĞŝŶƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͕ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌ͕ĂŶĚůĞǀĞůŽĨ͕ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů YĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ
ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨ͘ ƐƐƵŵŝŶŐƚŚĞ ĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚŶŽƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ YƌĞǀŝĞǁŝƐǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĞĚ͕
ŶŽƉƵďůŝĐƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚŝƐĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ ŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŝƚǁŝůůƐĞƌǀĞĂƐĂŶĚĚĞŶĚƵŵƚŽƚŚĞ^W /ZĂŶĚ
ďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬĞƌƐ͘ ŶLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚŝƚůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŐŽƚŽ ĂŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ ƉƵďůŝĐ ŚĞĂƌŝŶŐǁŝůůďĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚLJƉŝĐĂůƉƵďůŝĐƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚĂƐƉĞƌƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƚůĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĚĞŶĚƵŵ ǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶŵĂŬĞƌƐƚŽŝŶĨŽƌŵƚŚĞŝƌĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƚůĞŵĞŶƚ͘ 472 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 3

SITE INFORMATION
WƌŽũĞĐƚdŝƚůĞ͗ DĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬ DĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ

ŶƚŝƚůĞŵĞŶƚ;ƐͿ͗ EŽŶĞ
Assessor’s Parcel Number: ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨWEϬϭϲϲͲϬϮϬͲϮϰϬ;&ŝŐƵƌĞϭͿ͘ ^ŝƚĞƌĞĂ;ĂĐƌĞƐͿ͗ ƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϱϬ͘ϭͲĂĐƌĞƐŝƚĞŶŽƌƚŚŽĨEĞǁĂŶŽŶZŽĂĚ͘ >ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗
ƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϱϬ͘ϭĂĐƌĞƐŽĨƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚůĂŶĚŝŶƚŚĞĐŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͕ ĂůŽŶŐsĂŶĚĞŶZŽĂĚ͕ŶŽƌƚŚŽĨhŶŝŽŶƌĞĞŬĂŶĚĂŶŽŶZŽĂĚĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬĨĞĞƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞsĂŶĚĞŶZŽĂĚWĞĂďŽĚLJŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚϯ͕ϬϬϬ ĨĞĞƚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨƚŚĞĐŝƚLJŽĨsĂĐĂǀŝůůĞ͘
ŽŶŝŶŐ͗ ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ůůŽǁĂďůĞ,ĞŝŐŚƚ͗ DĂdžŝŵƵŵŚĞŝŐŚƚϳϱĨĞĞƚ͕&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞϮϱ͘ϯϬ͘ϲ;Ϳ;ϯͿ ĞŶƐŝƚLJ͗ E
ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŝŶ^W
/Z͗
The project is described in the original SP EIR as “Great Park” on an ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞϱϬͲĂĐƌĞƐŝƚĞ͘ ƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z͕ƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬ ŵĂLJ
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƵĐŚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂƐůŝŐŚƚĞĚƐƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚďĂƐĞďĂůůĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ƐƉŽƌƚƐĐŽƵƌƚƐ͕Ă ƐŬĂƚĞŶŽĚĞ͕ ƉůĂLJŐƌŽƵŶĚƐ͕ĂĐůŝŵďŝŶŐǁĂůů͕ďĂƚƚŝŶŐĐĂŐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂŶ ĂŵƉŚŝƚŚĞĂƚĞƌ͘dŚĞƉĂƌŬǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞůLJĂůƐŽŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂǁŝĚĞ ƌĂŶŐĞŽĨ ŶĂƚƵƌĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĐĞŶƚĞƌ͕ƚƌĂŝůƐǁŝƚŚ ŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚŝǀĞƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ĂƌĞƐƚŽƌĞĚ ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨhŶŝŽŶƌĞĞŬ͕ĂďŽĂƌĚǁĂůŬ͕ ǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚďŽŐĂƌĞĂƐ͘
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 473
City of Fairfield
4 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park

A PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. PROJECT OVERVIEW
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ;ƐŝƚĞͿŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϱϬ͘ϭ ĂĐƌĞƐŝŶĂƌĞĂĂŶĚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ;&ŝŐƵƌĞ ϭͿ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞĂŽĨƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂ ;&ŝŐƵƌĞϮͿ͘DĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬ ǁĂƐůĂďĞůĞĚĂƐƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬŝŶƚŚĞ ^W͘KŶĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ^W ǁĂƐĂůĂƌŐĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƉĂƌŬƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚ ŚŽƐƚǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚůĞŝƐƵƌĞ ĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐǁŚŝůĞƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƉĂƌƚƐŽĨƚŚĞďŽƌĚĞƌŝŶŐ'ƌĞĞŶďĞůƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ ĂŶĚsĂĐĂǀŝůůĞ͘dŚĞ^W objective was to “cŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂƉƵďůŝĐ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬ΀DĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ WĂƌŬ΁ ǁŝƚŚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐƉŽƌƚƐĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ĚĂLJƵƐĞĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐ͘” dŚĞƐŝƚĞǁĂƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƚŽ ďĞĂŶĂĐƚŝǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƉĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞͲƐĐĂůĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ &ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƐƉŽƌƚƐ ĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ƐƉŽƌƚƐĐŽƵƌƚƐ͕ƐŬĂƚĞŶŽĚĞƐ͕ƉŝĐŶŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ĂůĂŬĞ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂů ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ŝƐ ĂƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚŽŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚ WĂƌŬĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W͘hƉĚĂƚĞĚďŝŽůŽŐŝĐĂůĂŶĚĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƐƚƵĚŝĞƐǁĞƌĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƉĞƌŵŝƚƐ ĨŽƌƚŚĞĂŶŽŶ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĂƌĞĂ͕ŽĨǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ĂƌĞĂŝƐĂƉĂƌƚ͘

2. PROJECT LOCATION
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĂƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĂƌĐĞůŶƵŵďĞƌϬϭϲϲͲϬϮϬͲϮϰϬ͘ dŚĞƉĂƌŬŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŽŶ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϱϬ͘ϭ ĂĐƌĞƐ ŽĨƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌϭϬϰ͘ϭϰͲĂĐƌĞƉĂƌĐĞů͘dŚĞďĂůĂŶĐĞǁŝůů ƌĞŵĂŝŶƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐ Ăƚ ƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĞĚŐĞŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͕ŶŽƌƚŚŽĨhŶŝŽŶƌĞĞŬĂŶĚĂŶŽŶZŽĂĚ͕ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭϬ͕ϬϬϬĨĞĞƚ ŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞsĂŶĚĞŶZŽĂĚWĞĂďŽĚLJŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚϯ͕ϬϬϬĨĞĞƚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨ ƚŚĞsĂĐĂǀŝůůĞ ĐŝƚLJůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ ^ĞĞ&ŝŐƵƌĞϭ͘

3. EXISTING SETTING
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϲŵŝůĞƐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚĂƌĞĂ͘^ŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐ ƚŚĞKŶĞ>ĂŬĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚŽĨĨĞƌƐĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚLJƉĞƐ͘EŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ sĂĐĂǀŝůůĞĂŶĚƵŶŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚ^ŽůĂŶŽŽƵŶƚLJ͘sŝĞǁƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůĂŶĚĂŶĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘
sĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨĐƵůƚŝǀĂƚĞĚŐƌĂƐƐĞƐĂŶĚĂŶĂƌĞĂŽĨƚĂůůĞƌ͕ďƌŽǁŶǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞƌŶĂŶĚƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌŬďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJĂŶĚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘dŽƚŚĞǁĞƐƚ͕ ƐŽƵƚŚ͕ĂŶĚƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐhŶŝŽŶƌĞĞŬ͕ĂŶĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌĞĚĐƌĞĞŬĂŶĚŝŶƚĞƌŵŝƚƚĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĂŵƚŚĂƚŽƌŝŐŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞĂƐƚŽĨWĞĂďŽĚLJZŽĂĚŶĞĂƌĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚĂƚĞWƌŝƐŽŶ^ŽůĂŶŽŝŶsĂĐĂǀŝůůĞ͕ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭŵŝůĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ ƐŝƚĞ͘ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐĚĞůŝŶĞĂƚĞĚďLJďůĂĐŬŵĞƐŚĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭĨŽŽƚŝŶŚĞŝŐŚƚͿƚŽƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŽĨƐĂůĂŵĂŶĚĞƌ͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐĨůĂƚ͕ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞďŝŐŐĞƐƚŐƌĂĚĞĐŚĂŶŐĞ;ϭϱĨĞĞƚͿƌĂŶŐŝŶŐ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵŽĨƚŚĞĐƌĞĞŬƚŽĂŶĂƚƵƌĂůƌŝƐĞĂƚƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶĐŽƌŶĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞ ŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂϰͲ ĨŽŽƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƌĂŶŐĞ;ϵϮƚŽϵϲĨĞĞƚͿ͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞŚĂƐǁŝŶĚƉƌĞĚŽŵŝŶĂŶƚůLJĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞLJĞĂƌ͕ ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ǁŝŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚŽĐĐƵƌƐŵŽƌĞĐŽŵŵŽŶůLJĚƵƌŝŶŐǁŝŶƚĞƌ͘ ϮϬͲŝŶĐŚĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌĨƵĞůƚƌĂŶƐŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƉŝƉĞƌƵŶƐϰ ƚŽϳ ĨĞĞƚƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞƌŶƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘ KƚŚĞƌƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂŶƚƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶƚŚĞWŚĂƐĞϭ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĂĞƌŝĂůůLJĚĞƉŽƐŝƚĞĚ ůĞĂĚ͕ŽƌŐĂŶŽĐŚůŽƌŝŶĞƉĞƐƚŝĐŝĚĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉŽůLJĐLJĐůŝĐĂƌŽŵĂƚŝĐŚLJĚƌŽĐĂƌďŽŶƐ͘ĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐůŝŵŝƚĞĚ͕ǁŝƚŚŶŽ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ĞƐŝŐŶƐĨŽƌĂƌĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĞĚsĂŶĚĞŶZŽĂĚ;:ĞƉƐŽŶWĂƌŬǁĂLJͿŝŶĐůƵĚĞϮ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞ ĂĐĐĞƐƐƉŽŝŶƚƐƚŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘
474 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 5
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 475 City of Fairfield 6 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
Figure 2 Project Site Location and SP Land Use Map
476 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 7

4. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞŝƐƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉƚŚĞ ϱϬͲĂĐƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƉĂƌŬĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵů ƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞǁŚŝůĞƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐĂĐƚŝǀĞƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŚĞĂůƚŚLJůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐ͘ dŚĞĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞ^W ǁŽƵůĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƉĞŽƉůĞŽĨĂůůĂŐĞƐĂŶĚĐŽƵůĚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞďƵƚĂƌĞŶŽƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽůŝƚƐƉŽƌƚƐĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ ƐƉŽƌƚƐ ĐŽƵƌƚƐ͕ƐŚĂĚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͕ƉŝĐŶŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ͕ĂŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJůĂǁŶ͕ƐŬĂƚĞŶŽĚĞƐ͕ũŽŐŐŝŶŐƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ Ă ƚƌĂŝůŚĞĂĚǁŝƚŚ ŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚŝǀĞƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ŽƌĐŚĂƌĚƐƚLJůĞ landscaping, an amphitheater, children’s play areas, security lighting, aŶĚ ĐŽŶĐĞƐƐŝŽŶͬƌĞƐƚƌŽŽŵͬƐƚŽƌĂŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞďƵĨĨĞƌƐƚŽƉƌŽƚĞĐƚǁĞƚůĂŶĚƐ ĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞďŽƚŚĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞĂŶĚƌĞƚĞŶƚŝŽŶ;&ŝŐƵƌĞϯͿ͘

5. SP PRIOR APPROVALS
dŚĞ^W
/ZƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚŝŶϮϬϭϬĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŝĂůůLJƌĞĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚĞĚŝŶϮϬϭϭĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌ during the development of a “Great Park͘” The SP EIR described the proposed park as ůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶ ĂŶ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϱϬͲĂĐƌĞƐŝƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ“lighted sports and baseball fields, sports courts, a skate ŶŽĚĞ͕ƉůĂLJŐƌŽƵŶĚƐ͕ĂĐůŝŵďŝŶŐǁĂůů͕ďĂƚƚŝŶŐĐĂŐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂŶĂŵƉŚŝƚŚĞĂƚĞƌ͘” The City’s expectation was that the ^W ǁŽƵůĚ ŚĂǀĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽĨůĂƚĞƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŶŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽƌŽŶůLJĨŽĐƵƐĞĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐďĞLJŽŶĚ ƚŚĞ^W
/ZǁŽƵůĚďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ͘>ĂƚĞƌĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐĨŽƌƐŝƚĞͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞDĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ǁŽƵůĚďĞĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽĨŽĐƵƐŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ^W /ZůĂĐŬĞĚĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚƐŝƚĞͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ
ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘
WƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĂƚŝĐĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/ZŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐ͕ĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ďŝŽůŽŐŝĐĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ŐĞŽůŽŐLJ͕ŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŐĂƐĞƐĂŶĚĐůŝŵĂƚĞĐŚĂŶŐĞ͕ŚLJĚƌŽůŽŐLJ͕ŶŽŝƐĞ͕ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕ƉƵďůŝĐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ůĂŶĚƵƐĞ͕ĂŶĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŽƵůĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŽƵůĚƉĂLJĂůů ĐŽƐƚƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌŵƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂ͘ƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁĞƌĞ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͕ĂŶĚĂŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐƉůĂŶǁĂƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƚŽŐƵŝĚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ͘
WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽDĂƚƚ'ĂƌĐŝĂWĂƌŬĂƌĞůĂƌŐĞůLJĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W͘ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŚĂǀĞĞǀŽůǀĞĚƚŽŬĞĞƉƉĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĞdžƉƌĞƐƐĞĚĚĞƐŝƌĞƐŽĨŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚ ŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďƵƚ ǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌ^W /ZŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĂϮϬ͕ϬϬϬͲƐƋƵĂƌĞͲĨŽŽƚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂů
ĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ ĂŶĚĂĚŽŐƉĂƌŬ͘
dŚĞƐĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞƉƌĞĐŝƐĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƉŽƌƚƐĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ ǁĞƌĞŶŽƚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJ ĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z ĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬ͕ƚŚƵƐĂƐƐƵŵƉƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝŶƚŚĞ /ZŵĂLJŽƌŵĂLJŶŽƚďĞ
ƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ͘ dŚĞƐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͕ƚŚĞŝƌĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W /ZĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐ͕ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ^W
/ZDDƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂƌĞ ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶĞĂĐŚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶďĞůŽǁ͘
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 477
City of Fairfield
8 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
Figure 3 Preferred Design Concept

6. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĨĂĐƚŽƌƐĐŽƵůĚďĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞƐŝŐŶ͗ • ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐ͕ŝƌYƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ŝŽůŽŐŝĐĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕'ĞŽůŽŐLJĂŶĚ^ŽŝůƐ͕'ƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞ'ĂƐ

ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕,ĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕,LJĚƌŽůŽŐLJĂŶĚtĂƚĞƌ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕>ĂŶĚhƐĞĂŶĚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕EŽŝƐĞ͕WƵďůŝĐ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚdƌŝďĂůƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘ ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞŶŽ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶ ĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƉŝĐƐ ƚŚĂƚǁĂƐŶŽƚƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͘
ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽ ŚĂǀĞĂWŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ/ŵƉĂĐƚĂĨƚĞƌDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŽŶ ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐ͕ŝƌYƵĂůŝƚLJ͕>ĂŶĚhƐĞ͕EŽŝƐĞ͕WƵďůŝĐ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨKǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƌĞŵĂŝŶƐ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞƐĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͕ǁŝƚŚŶŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ ŝŶŵĂŐŶŝƚƵĚĞ͘ 478 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 9

B EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Checklist Overview
dŚŝƐĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐŝŶƚĞƌŵƐŽĨĂŶLJ“ĐŚĂŶŐĞĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ” ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ ĐŚĂŶŐĞĚĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͕ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͕ŽƌŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶĐĞͿƚŚĂƚŵĂLJƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚŽƐĞĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ^W /Z͘Ɛ
ƐƵĐŚ͕ƚŚĞƌŽǁƚŝƚůĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĨƵůůƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚŽƉŝĐƐ͕ĂƐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ 
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƉƉĞŶĚŝdž'͕ ƚŽŚĞůƉĂŶƐǁĞƌƚŚĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽďĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽWƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ ϮϭϬϴϯ͘ϯĂŶĚϮϭϭϲϲĂŶĚ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ ϭϱϭϲϮƚŽϭϱϭϲϰĂŶĚϭϱϭϴϯ͘
dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨĞĂĐŚĐŽůƵŵŶŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚďĞůŽǁ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚƚĂďůĞƐ ŝŶĞĂĐŚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƌĞĨŽůůŽǁĞĚďLJĂƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞ^W
/Z ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨƚŚĂƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚŽƉŝĐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƵŵŵĂƌŝĞƐ͕ĂůŝƐƚ ŽĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚDDƐ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ^W
/Z͘ ĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞĂŶƐǁĞƌƐƚŽƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ ;Ğ͘Ő͕͘ zĞƐ͕EŽ͕EŽƚ ƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ΀E΁Ϳ͕ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŵĂLJďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ƚŽ ĨŽůůŽǁĞĂĐŚĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͘ &ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƚŚĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞ^W
/Z ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝƐƚŚĞ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ;ϭͿĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐ how the project’s ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĐŽŵƉĂƌĞƚŽƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͖ ;ϮͿŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŝƚLJĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ
ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĂŶĚ DDƐ ƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůLJƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͖ ĂŶĚ;ϯͿƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƐ ĂŶLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůDDƐ ƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚďĞĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽ ƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘
dŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƚĞdžƚŽĨƚŚĞ^W ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞ^W /ZĂƌĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƚ
ŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĨĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚͬĐŝƚLJͲĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͬĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJͲĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚͬƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐͲĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶͬůŽŶŐͲ ƌĂŶŐĞͲƉůĂŶƐͲƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐͬƚƌĂŝŶͲƐƚĂƚŝŽŶͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐͲƉůĂŶ͍ůŽĐĂůĞсĞŶ͘ Checklist Questions
dŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐ͗
tŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJ͍
dŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĐƌŽƐƐͲƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽƚŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚŶƵŵďĞƌƐŽƌƉĂŐĞƐŝŶ ƚŚĞ^W /ZǁŚĞƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŵĂLJďĞĨŽƵŶĚƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝƐƐƵĞůŝƐƚĞĚƵŶĚĞƌĞĂĐŚƚŽƉŝĐ͘ ŽƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͕ŶĞǁĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͕ŽƌŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŶĞǁƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚͬƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ŵŽƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍
WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϲϮ͕ƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƐ;ĂͿ;ϭͿĂŶĚ;ĂͿ;ϮͿĂŶĚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ Y
'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϴϯ͕ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ďͿ;ϰͿ͕ƚŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽƌĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐŽƌǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐǁŚŝĐŚ͕ĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂů ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŽƌŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶǁŚŝĐŚǁĂƐŶŽƚŬŶŽǁŶĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞƚŚĞ^W /ZǁĂƐĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ͕ĂƌĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂ
more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR. A “yes” answer will be followed by an indication of whether the impact is “potentially significant,” “less than significant with mitigation incorporated,” or “less ƚŚĂŶ significant.” An analysis of the determination will appear in the “Consistency Evaluation” section following the ĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͘
/ƐƚŚĞƌĞƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐŶĞǁĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽƌǀĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͍ WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϲϮ͕ƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ;ĂͿ;ϯͿ;ͲͿ͕ƚŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌŶĞǁ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶĐĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁĂƐŶŽƚŬŶŽǁŶĂŶĚĐŽƵůĚŶŽƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŬŶŽǁŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ ŽĨƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞĚŝůŝŐĞŶĐĞĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ
/ZǁĂƐĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͕ƐŚŽǁƐĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ ŝ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞϭ ŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŶŽƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ /Z͘
ŝŝ͘ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĞdžĂŵŝŶĞĚǁŝůůďĞƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŽƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĞƚŚĂŶƐŚŽǁŶŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ

/Z͘
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 479
City of Fairfield
10 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
ŝŝŝ͘ DDƐ ŽƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĨŽƵŶĚŶŽƚƚŽďĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞǁŽƵůĚďĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ƌĞĚƵĐĞϭ ŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉŽŶĞŶƚƐĚĞĐůŝŶĞƚŽĂĚŽƉƚƚŚĞDD ŽƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘
ŝǀ͘ DDƐ ŽƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂďůLJĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚŽƐĞĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ /ZĂŶĚ
ǁŽƵůĚƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJƌĞĚƵĐĞϭ ŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ ĚĞĐůŝŶĞƚŽĂĚŽƉƚƚŚĞDD ŽƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘
ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞŶŽƚďĞĞŶĚŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚŝŶƉƌŝŽƌĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍ WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϴϯ͕ƚŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ ĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚ are peculiar to the project or its site. A “yes” answer in the checklist indicates ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚĂƐ ĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞ^P EIR. A “yes” answer will be followed by an indication of whether the impact is “potentially significant,” “less than significant with mitigation incorporated,” or “less than significant.” An analysis of the determination will appear in the “Consistency Evaluation” section following the checklist. ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚďLJƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJĂƉƉůŝĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͍
WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϴϯ͕ƚŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJĂƉƉůŝĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ ǁŝƚŚĂĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞLJƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞĨĨĞĐƚǁŚĞŶĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽĨƵƚƵƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ǁŝůůƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽ the project or the parcel. A “yes” answer in the checklist indicates that the project has effects peĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͕ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞ
ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJĂƉƉůŝĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞĂŐĞŶĐLJ͘ A “yes” answer will be followed by an indication of whether the impact is “potentially significant,” “less than significant with mitigation incorporated,” or “less than significant.” An analysis of the determination will appear in the “Consistency Evaluation” section following the checklist. tĞƌĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞŽƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍ WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ
Y'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϱϭϴϯ͕ƐƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;ďͿ;ϯͿƚŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚ ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞŽƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͘A “ŶŽ” answer in the
ĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚĂƐƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽ ƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^P EIR. A “ŶŽ” answer will be followed by an ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨǁŚĞƚŚĞƌthe impact is “potentially significant,” “less than significant with mitigation incorporated,” or “less than significant.” An analysis of the determination will appear in the “Consistency Evaluation” section ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͘
ŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĨƌŽŵƉƌŝŽƌĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐƌĞƐŽůǀĞƌĞƐŝĚƵĂůƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍ dŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂŶĚͬŽƌƚŚĞĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞůĞĂĚ ĂŐĞŶĐLJĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬŝŶŐďŽĚLJƉƌŽǀŝĚĞDDƐ to address effects in the related impact category. A “yes” response ǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝĨƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶǁŽƵůĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͘/ĨƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚ ǁŽƵůĚƌĞŵĂŝŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞ column will indicate “LJĞƐ͕ ďƵƚƚŚĞimpact remains significant and unavoidable.” If “NA” is indicated, this ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁĐŽŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕DDƐĂƌĞ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘dŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƐ ƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶƐŝŶŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶLJĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘ /ƐƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨKǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ ƚŽƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŽĨƚŚĞ^W͍ dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶEŽ͘ϮϬϭϭͲϭϱϴ͕ĂƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ ŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐƉůĂŶ͕ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂƐƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͕ǁĞƌĞ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ͘dŚŝƐĐŽůƵŵŶ 480 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 11
ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐǁŚĞƚŚĞƌƚŚĞ^W
/ZŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ ĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞŝƚLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ /ƚŝƐŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƚŽŶŽƚĞƚŚĂƚĂ “no” answer ƚŽƚŚĞĐŽůƵŵŶƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌŝůLJŵĞĂŶƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJďƵƚŝŶƐƚĞĂĚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐŶŽƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĐŚĂŶŐĞ ŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶŽƌƐƚĂƚƵƐŽĨƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĂƐŝƚǁĂƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĂŶĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ^W /Z͘
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 481 City of Fairfield 12 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park

1. AESTHETICS

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů/ƐƐƵĞ
tŽƵůĚƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚ͗
tŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚ
ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJ͍
ŽƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐͬŶĞǁ
ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐͬ
ŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŶĞǁ
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚͬ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŽƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍
/ƐƚŚĞƌĞ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŶĞǁ
ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐŶĞǁ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽƌ
ǀĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͍
ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ
ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌ
ƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ
ƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞ ŶŽƚ
ďĞĞŶĚŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚŝŶ
ƉƌŝŽƌ
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍
ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ
ƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞ
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚǁŝůů
ŶŽƚďĞ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJ
ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ
ƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJĂƉƉůŝĞĚ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌ
ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͍
tĞƌĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJ
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞ
ŽƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ
ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶ
ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍
ŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ
ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĨƌŽŵ
ƉƌŝŽƌĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ
ƌĞƐŽůǀĞƌĞƐŝĚƵĂů
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍
/ƐƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ
ŽĨKǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐ
ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͍
Ă͘,ĂǀĞĂƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĂĚǀĞƌƐĞĞĨĨĞĐƚŽŶĂƐĐĞŶŝĐǀŝƐƚĂ͍ ƌĂĨƚ^W
/Z;
/ZͿ/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϭ
EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ zĞƐ E E
ď͘^ƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJĚĂŵĂŐĞƐĐĞŶŝĐƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͕ďƵƚŶŽƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽ͕ƚƌĞĞƐ͕ƌŽĐŬŽƵƚĐƌŽƉƉŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂƐƚĂƚĞƐĐĞŶŝĐŚŝŐŚǁĂLJ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϮ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ zĞƐ E E
Đ͘^ƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJĚĞŐƌĂĚĞƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐǀŝƐƵĂůĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞĂŶĚŝƚƐƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐƐ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϯ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ zĞƐ EŽ zĞƐ
Ě͘ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĞǁƐŽƵƌĐĞŽĨƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůŝŐŚƚŽƌŐůĂƌĞǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚĂĚǀĞƌƐĞůLJĂĨĨĞĐƚĚĂLJŽƌŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞǀŝĞǁƐŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϰ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ zĞƐ EŽ zĞƐ
482 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 13
SP EIR Analysis
dŚŝƐƚŽƉŝĐŝƐĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶŚĂƉƚĞƌϰ͘ϭ͕ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐ͕ ŽĨƚŚĞ ^W /Z͘dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂĂŶĚƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂĂƌĞ
ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝnjĞĚƉƌĞĚŽŵŝŶĂŶƚůLJďLJƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŐƌĂƐƐůĂŶĚƐĂŶĚƌŽůůŝŶŐŚŝůůƐǁŝƚŚƐĐĂƚƚĞƌĞĚƚƌĞĞƐ͘^ĐĞŶŝĐǀŝĞǁƐŽĨ ƚŚĞĞŵĞŶƚZĂŶŐĞ͕ǁŝƚŚĞŵĞŶƚ,ŝůů͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞsĂĐĂDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƐ͕ƌŝƐĞƚŽĂŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϳϬϬƚŽϴϬϬĨĞĞƚ ĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂ͘sŝĞǁƐ ŽĨƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬƐŝƚĞǁĞƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐĂƐsWϮŶŽƌƚŚ͕ŽŶƉĂŐĞϰ͘ϭͲϲ͕ ĂŶĚŝŶ <ĞLJKďƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶWŽŝŶƚƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘dŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽĨŐůĂƌĞĨƌŽŵƉĂƌŬůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐǁĞƌĞ ĂůƐŽĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚĂŶĚƚŚĞǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ǁĞƌĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽďĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͘
Impact Analysis
/ŵƉĂĐƚƐĨƌŽŵĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁĞƌĞ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z ŽŶƉĂŐĞƐϰ͘ϭͲϭϴ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϰ͘ϭͲϮϯ͘
/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϭĚǀĞƌƐĞ/ŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶ^ĐĞŶŝĐsŝƐƚĂƐ͗ dŚĞ^W
/ZŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞWůĂŶƌĞĂŝƐŶŽƚůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŶLJ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ^ĐĞŶŝĐsŝƐƚĂĂƌĞĂďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƌĞǁŽƵůĚďĞŶŽŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘ /ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϮĂŵĂŐĞƚŽ^ĐĞŶŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂ^ƚĂƚĞ^ĐĞŶŝĐ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ͗ dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůůLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ƐĐĞŶŝĐŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĐŝƚLJŽĨ&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚŽƌǁŝƚŚŝŶ^ŽůĂŶŽŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŽƵůĚďĞŶŽŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘ /ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϯĞŐƌĂĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨsŝƐƵĂůŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͗ WƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƵůĚƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJĂůƚĞƌƚŚĞǀŝƐƵĂů ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĐŽŶǀĞƌƚŝŶŐ ƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƵƌďĂŶƵƐĞƐĂŶĚĂůƚĞƌŝŶŐƚŚĞǀŝƐƵĂů ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨůĂƌŐĞƉŽƌƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ^W ƌĞĂĨƌŽŵĂŶŽƉĞŶƌƵƌĂůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƚŽĂŶƵƌďĂŶŝnjĞĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ͘dŚĞ^W ǁŽƵůĚ ĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŽŶƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁƐŽĨĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƚŚĞĞŵĞŶƚ,ŝůůZĂŶŐĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞsĂĐĂDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƐ͕ĂŶĚǀŝĞǁƐĨƌŽŵ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐŝŶsĂĐĂǀŝůůĞ͕&ĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚ͕ĂŶĚƵŶŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚ^ŽůĂŶŽ͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞ ĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ ŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘DDϰ͘ϭͲϯǁĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚ͕ďƵƚŝƚǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞŵĂŝŶ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞ͘ƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘ /ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϭͲϰ/ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶEŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞ>ŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂLJƚŝŵĞ'ůĂƌĞ͗ dŚĞ^W /Z ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ
ǁŽƵůĚďĞĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚ ƉĂƌŬůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJǁŽƵůĚďĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝĨŶŽƚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚ͘ /ƚǁĂƐĨŽƵŶĚƚŚĂƚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶǁŽƵůĚƌĞĚƵĐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽůŝŐŚƚĂŶĚŐůĂƌĞ͕ĂŶĚDD ϰ͘ϭͲϰ;ĂĂŶĚďͿǁĂƐ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ƵƌďĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŽƵůĚƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚůLJŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽĨŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͘EŽDDƐ ǁĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚĨƵůůLJƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞǀŝĞǁƐǁŚŝůĞĂƚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƚŝŵĞĂůůŽǁŝŶŐƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƌĞŵĂŝŶĞĚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞ͘ƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨ ŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘
Applicable Mitigation Measures
DD ϰ͘ϭͲϯ͗dŚŝƐDD ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĂůůƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ ŐŽǀĞƌŶŝŶŐŐƌĂĚŝŶŐ͕ƐůŽƉĞƐ͕ ǀŝĞǁƐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ĂŶĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͘ dŚŝƐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽŶŽƚƌĞĚƵĐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĂ ůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ ůĞǀĞů͕ĂŶĚĂƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘ DDϰ͘ϭͲϰ ;ĂĂŶĚďͿ͗dŚŝƐDD ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐ ƚŚĂƚƐƉŽƌƚƐůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐƚŽƉůĂLJĨŝĞůĚƐ ĂŶĚĂǀŽŝĚůŝŐŚƚƐƉŝůůĂŐĞŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌŬƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƵƐĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŽ ĂǀŽŝĚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝǀĞŐůĂƌĞƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚďĞǀŝƐŝďůĞƚŽƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽƌŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞǀŝĐŝŶŝƚLJ͘ƉŚŽƚŽŵĞƚƌŝĐƐƚƵĚLJǁĂƐ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ>ŝŐŚƚŝŶŐZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐ͕/ŶĐ͕͘ǁŚŝĐŚ ĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŵĞĞƚƚŚŝƐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ ;ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž Ϳ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁĞƌĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽďĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚ ƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞ͘ƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ ŝŵƉĂĐƚ͘ Consistency Evaluation
EŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůƉĂƌŬĐŽŶĐĞƉƚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞĂŶ ĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚ ĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĨƌŽŵŽƌŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉĂƌŬŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŽƵůĚďĞ
ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ^W ĂŶĚǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĨƌŽŵƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐǁĞƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞůLJĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞ^W
/Z͘ The project’s aesthetic impacts are consistent with the prior  YĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ͕ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 483
City of Fairfield
14 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐŽŵĞŶĞǁĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƉůĂŶŶĞĚƉĂƌŬ ƵƐĞƐĂŶĚĚŽŶŽƚĐŚĂŶŐĞƚŚĞǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌŬ͘&ŽƌĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ƐŽĐĐĞƌĨŝĞůĚƐŚĂǀĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞĚďĂƐĞďĂůůĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ ďƵƚŽƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚ ŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶŽĨĂ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲƐƚŽƌLJ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƚŚĞLJĂƌĞ ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJƐŝŵŝůĂƌ͘dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚDDϰ͘ϭϭͲϯŝŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞŐƵŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞŽǀĞƌĂůůǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨ ƐŚŝĨƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƚŽƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ^W ĂŶĚŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐǁĂƐĨŽƵŶĚƚŽďĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨ ŽǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƉƉůŝĞƐ ƚŽƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ 484 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX G
City of Fairfield
EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park 15

2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů/ƐƐƵĞ
tŽƵůĚƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚ͗
tŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚ
ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJ͍
ŽƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐͬŶĞǁ
ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐͬ
ŶĞǁŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŶĞǁ
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚͬ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŽƌĞ
ƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍
/ƐƚŚĞƌĞ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŶĞǁ
ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐŶĞǁ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽƌ
ǀĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͍
ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ
ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌ
ƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚ
ŚĂǀĞ ŶŽƚďĞĞŶ
ĚŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚŝŶƉƌŝŽƌ
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍
ƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ
ƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞ
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚǁŝůů
ŶŽƚďĞ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJ
ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƵŶŝĨŽƌŵůLJ
ĂƉƉůŝĞĚ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŽƌ
ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͍
tĞƌĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJ
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞ
ŽƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚ
ŝŶƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͍
ŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ
ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĨƌŽŵ
ƉƌŝŽƌĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ
ƌĞƐŽůǀĞƌĞƐŝĚƵĂů
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͍
/ƐƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚ
ŽĨKǀĞƌƌŝĚŝŶŐ
ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͍
Ă͘ŽŶǀĞƌƚWƌŝŵĞ&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚ͕hŶŝƋƵĞ&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚ͕Žƌ&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚŽĨ^ƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞ/ŵƉŽƌƚĂŶĐĞ;&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚͿ͕ĂƐƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƚŚĞŵĂƉƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚDĂƉƉŝŶŐĂŶĚDŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐWƌŽŐƌĂŵŽĨƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŐĞŶĐLJ͕ƚŽŶŽŶͲĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƵƐĞ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϮͲϭ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ E E
ď͘ŽŶĨůŝĐƚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐnjŽŶŝŶŐĨŽƌĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƵƐĞ͕ŽƌĂtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶĐƚĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϮͲϮ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ zĞƐ E E
Đ͘ŽŶĨůŝĐƚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐnjŽŶŝŶŐĨŽƌ͕ŽƌĐĂƵƐĞƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐŽĨ͕ĨŽƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚ;ĂƐĚĞĨŝŶĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϮϮϮϬ;ŐͿͿ͕ƚŝŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ;ĂƐĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJWƵďůŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĚĞƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϰϱϮϲͿ͕ŽƌƚŝŵďĞƌůĂŶĚnjŽŶĞĚdŝŵďĞƌůĂŶĚWƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ;ĂƐĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚŽĚĞƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϱϭϭϬϰ;ŐͿͿ͍ 
/Z/ŵƉĂĐƚϰ͘ϮͲϭϮ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ E E
Ě͘ZĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞůŽƐƐŽĨĨŽƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨĨŽƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚƚŽŶŽŶͲĨŽƌĞƐƚƵƐĞ͍ 
/ZƉĂŐĞϰ͘ϮͲϭϮ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ EŽ E E
EIR Memorandum
MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN 485
City of Fairfield
16 EIR Consistency Checklist for the Matt Garcia Park
SP EIR Analysis
dŚŝƐƚŽƉŝĐŝƐĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶŚĂƉƚĞƌϰ͘Ϯ, “ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ,” of the ^W /Z͘/ƚǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ
ƐŝƚĞŝƐĐŽŵƉŽƐĞĚŽĨ ůĂŶĚƐƵŝƚĂďůĞĨŽƌŐƌĂnjŝŶŐĂŶĚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶ/ŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚƵŶĚĞƌ Y͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞ
'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬƐŝƚĞǁĂƐŶŽƚƵŶĚĞƌĂtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶĐƚŽŶƚƌĂĐƚ͘ dŚĞ^W /ZĚŝĚŶŽƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ůĂĐŬŽĨĨŽƌĞƐƚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽƌƚŝŵďĞƌůĂŶĚŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂ͘EŽƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐǁĞƌĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞŶŽDDƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
Impact Analysis
/ŵƉĂĐƚƐĨƌŽŵĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁĞƌĞ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z ŽŶ ƉĂŐĞƐϰ͘ϮͲϭϮ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϰ͘ϮͲϭϱ͘ dŚĞ^W
/ZĨŽƵŶĚƚŚĂƚ
ƚŚĞƌĞǁĂƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ŽƌĨŽƌĞƐƚƌLJĨŽƌƚŚĞ'ƌĞĂƚWĂƌŬƐŝƚĞ͘ Applicable Mitigation Measures
EŽDDƐ ǁĞƌĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘
Consistency Evaluation
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŶŽŶŽƚĂďůĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŚĂǀĞŽĐĐƵƌƌĞĚƚŚĞƌĞ ƐŝŶĐĞƚŚĞ^W /ZǁĂƐ
ĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞǁĂƐŶŽƚ ƵŶĚĞƌĂtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶĐƚŽŶƚƌĂĐƚ ƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐ͘ƐĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞƚLJƉĞ͕ƐŝnjĞ͕ĂŶĚŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞǁŽƵůĚ ďĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ^W͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŵŽƌĞƌĞĨŝŶĞĚƚŚĂŶƚŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂůůĂŶĚƵƐĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝŶƚŚĞ ^W͕ ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^W /Z͘ dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƉƌŽũĞĐƚͲ
ƌĞůĂƚĞĚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽŶ ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞĂŶĚ&ŽƌĞƐƚƌLJ ǁŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ^W /Z͘
dŚĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞďĂĐŬďŽŶĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ^W ĂŶĚ ǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂĚǀĞƌƐĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞĂŶĚ&ŽƌĞƐƚƌLJ ďĞLJŽŶĚǁŚĂƚǁĂƐ ĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƉĞĐƵůŝĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W /Z͕ŶŽŶĞǁ
ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐƌĞĂƚĞƌŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚďĞ ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŽƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĞƚŚĂŶĚŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^W
/Z͘ dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚ ĂŶĚ ŶŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
EŽƚŚŝŶŐĂďŽƵƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐŝƚĞͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞƐŝŐŶ ǁŽƵůĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƚŚĞĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ^W /ZŽƌƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ
ŶĞǁŽƌƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJŵŽƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁŝƐŶĞĞĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽ ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞĂŶĚ&ŽƌĞƐƚƌLJ͘
486 MATT GARCIA COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN

← All documents from this meeting