Fairfield City Council
June 17, 2025

LRA Legislation Factsheet

Agenda Item No: Q.1

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 17, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions 2025-118 and 2025-119 PW Proposed Water Rate Increases and Adopting Procedures for Proposition 218
Resolution 2025-118 Authorizing the City Council to Direct Staff to Initiate the Proposition 218 Process and Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Proposed Increases and Modifications to the City’s Water Rates and Making Environmental Findings with Respect Thereto Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Resolution 2025-119 Adopting Procedures for the Conduct of a Public Hearing And Majority Protest Proceedings Relating to Proposed Increases and Modifications to the City’s Water Rates in Accordance with Article XIII D Of the California Constitution, the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, and Government Code Sections 53759.1 And 53759.2 Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Michael J. Hether, (707) 428-7493

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt the resolutions.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Fairfield Municipal Utility (FMU) provides water to the City of Fairfield on a continuous basis and is responsible for operating the existing water system, as well as ensuring that it is maintained to meet adequate service levels. On May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted the Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP), which evaluates the existing water system and develops a comprehensive water system Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

In conjunction with producing PUMP, the City retained Bartle Wells Associates (BWA) to prepare a water rate study using PUMP as the baseline guidance document for repair and replacement projects within FMU’s CIP. The water rate study was conducted in conjunction with PUMP to ensure that FMU can generate enough revenue to carry out minimum prudent CIP needs while

meeting all operations and maintenance expenses, debt service and reserve requirements. The FMU is primarily funded by fees received from the ratepayers.

The water rates last increased in 2021. The current water rate study documents the need for a new water rates fee schedule.

DISCUSSION
Summary of Findings
FMU provides water to the City of Fairfield on a continuous basis and employs staff who are responsible for maintaining a system valued at over $500 million. This system compromises of two water treatment plants, 12 storage facilities, 17 pump stations, nearly 400 miles of pipelines and fixtures (hydrants, valves, etc.), and over 30,000 water services. The water system, which is operated by talented, dedicated and highly trained staff, contains extensive and well-maintained facilities that incorporate redundant design features, ensuring reliability with few service interruptions or emergency repairs. For these extremely valuable community assets to remain in good condition, on-going investment in the proper maintenance and repair of the water infrastructure is critical.

Generally, CIP projects identified within PUMP primarily address the following: (1) age and declining condition of the water system assets; and (2) capacity and deficiencies in system performance. Over the past several decades, the water system was kept in good operating condition through continued investment and proper execution of preventative maintenance and repair activities. However, based on the useful life of the current water system, it is expected that FMU will begin to face large, annual, and ongoing capital funding needs starting approximately 8-10 years out, which will continue decades into the future as the existing water system continues to age. Projects identified in PUMP were categorized and are planned for working well before aging system failures.

As the water system continues to age, FMU is expected to provide adequate service levels. There are several factors used to define service level:
1) The amount of water available.
2) The quality of the water delivered.
3) The continuity of service and regular delivery of water with minimal disruption and cost.

The City excels in building redundant facilities and maintaining the system, which has resulted in few service interruptions or emergency repairs.

To prioritize future water system CIP and maintenance programs, analysis of the physical condition and operating capabilities of current water system assets were summarized in PUMP.

This analysis gives a clearer picture and informs decision making regarding risk level and

criticality. All water system assets were evaluated using industry standard risk assessment procedures that consider the likelihood of failure (LOF) and consequence of failure (COF). The LOF assesses the probability that an asset or facility will fail to perform at its prescribed service level, and the COF considers the effects resulting from such a failure. The risk score was then determined using both LOF and COF (Risk Score = LOF x COF).

For example, as our unseen buried pipelines and fixtures (e.g. valves, service laterals, etc.) approach the estimated end of useful life (EUL), it is critical that significant investments be made to reduce water system outages. As it pertains to buried pipelines and valves, rehabilitation and replacement programs were developed and prioritized based on the remaining useful life (RUL).

Expected improvements were forecasted and prioritized based on EUL and RUL with the basic understanding that some projects are needed as soon as practical, while others will need to be planned. It is more critical now to enact certain maintenance programs (e.g., large valve replacements) that may not have been conducted in the past, especially as certain critical assets approach their EUL.

The last water rate increases were implemented January 1, 2018, through January 1, 2021 (4% annually). The City’s past practice of routine, modest rate increases to avoid large rate spikes has served the community well. Historically, FMU provided strong financial management with small annual rate adjustments to keep revenues in line with the cost of providing service while maintaining healthy fund reserves. While staff have worked hard to ensure efficient operations and continued improvement in controlling costs, FMU has experienced substantial increases in operating and maintenance expenses over the last 4-1/2years, most of which are market driven.

Since rates were last adjusted on January 1, 2021, FMU has experienced significant cost increases in electricity, chemicals, materials, professional services and public employee’s retirement system (PERS) funding requirements. Generally, utilities face higher inflationary increases than the consumer price index (CPI), which measures consumer inflation. Due to the increase in operating expenses over the past several years, current water rates barely cover the annual operating expenses and debt service and only generate minimal funding for capital improvements. Additionally, rate increases are also needed to ensure compliance with the City’s debt service coverage covenants in connection with outstanding water debt.

In summary, after 4-1/2 years with no rate increases, the City needs to increase water rates to:
1) Recover operating costs which have increased significantly 2) Phase in funding for high-priority capital improvements to the City’s aging water infrastructure
3) Ensure compliance with the City’s debt service coverage covenants in connection with outstanding water debt
Careful management and efficient operations have allowed FMU to operate through drought and post COVID-19 marketplace conditions. While FMU’s financial position remains stable in the short

term, maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of existing water infrastructure assets is a near-term need.

Proposition 218 Notice and Majority Protest Process and Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Requirement
Water rate increases are subject to Proposition 218’s (Article XIII D of the California Constitution) public hearing and majority protest procedures. Staff recommend that the council adopt Resolution 2025-118 to initiate the process, schedule a public hearing, and direct staff to provide notice of the public hearing in accordance with Proposition 218. FMU staff will engage in public education over the next several months, provide mailed notice of the public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218, and substantially in the form included as Exhibit D.

At the conclusion of the public hearing, written protests received from property owners and water customers will be tabulated (with only one protest per parcel counted) to determine whether a majority protest exists (i.e., written protests represent more than 50% of all the parcels receiving water service). The council cannot adopt the proposed water rate increases if a majority protest exists.

Proposition 218 authorizes the City to adopt procedures for the conduct of the public hearing and majority protest proceedings. Staff recommends the council adopt Resolution 2025-119. The procedures describe in detail how written protests can be submitted and how they will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a majority protest.

The procedures also establish a new optional exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement, pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 2257, which became effective January 1, 2025. Staff recommend that the council adopt an exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement because it is designed to provide an opportunity for the City to address objections during the Proposition 218 public participation process, reducing the likelihood of litigation after rate increases are approved. The City must provide a period of at least 45 days after the notice of the public hearing is mailed for persons and entities to submit to the City written objections that allege that the proposed rates do not comply with the substantive requirements of Proposition 218. The notice of the public hearing statesthat a failure to timely object in writing bars any right to challenge the proposed water rates through a legal proceeding. The council must adopt written responses to all timely submitted written objections prior to or during the public hearing.

Pursuant to the proposed schedule for the Proposition 218 proceedings, notice of the public hearing will be mailed by July 11, 2025, the last date to submit an AB 2257 written objection will be August 27, 2025, the council will consider written responses to the written objections on October 21, 2025, and the public hearing will be held on November 4, 2025. If the council approves the rate increase, the new water rates will become effective on January 1, 2026, with rate increases on each subsequent January 1 through January 1, 2030.

Summary of Recommendations
Fairfield’s water rates are currently among the lowest in the region, based on a survey of 16 regional water agencies. Over the past two years, City staff have worked closely with West Yost, a water engineering consultancy firm, to create the PUMP. BWA has evaluated the findings within PUMP and prepared the water rates study for the public hearing on the proposed water rate increases. BWA’s Water Rate Study Summary of Findings and Recommendations is included as Exhibit C to this Report.

BWA recommends simplifying and standardizing the City’s water rates, realigning rates with cost of service, and charging the rates consistently for all water customers. BWA developed three draft financial and rate scenarios differentiated by the level of water system capital improvement funding. All scenarios assume projected rate increases are phased in over five years(each January 1, from 2026 through 2030) to help minimize the annual impact on ratepayers. The draft financial and rate scenarios include the following:

A. Support Water Master Plan: a combination of 12% increases for 3 consecutive years and 10% increases for two years thereafter (5 years total). After full phase-in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support approximately $10 million (current $) per year of annual funding needed to address ongoing, longer-term capital funding needs as recommended in PUMP.

B. Reduced Rate Increases: 10% annual rate increases for each of the next 5 years. After full phase-in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support approximately $8 million (current $) per year of annual funding needed to address ongoing, longer-term capital funding needs as recommended in PUMP.

C. Further Reduced Rate Increases: 8% annual rate increases for each of the next 5 years. After full phase-in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support only approximately $5 million (current $) per year of annual funding needed to address ongoing, longer-term capital funding needs. While this is substantially lower than the average annual funding levels recommended in PUMP, additional rate increases could be phased in in future years to support long-term capital needs.

The full Summary of Findings and Recommendations, along with methodologies and analysis regarding cash flow, financial and rate projections are included in Exhibit C.

Based on the options summarized above and included as Exhibit C, staff recommend an 8% annual rate increase for the next five years. In the absence of a majority protest, the council may adopt the proposed water rate increases set forth in this notice of the public hearing or may adjust the rates in response to written and oral comments provided that the adopted water rates do not exceed the rates set forth in this notice.

As part of the proposed schedule of rate increases, staff recommend providing for the potential pass-through of increases in wholesale water costs. The City purchases wholesale water and has no control over its costs. The City estimated future wholesale costs in the water rates study.

However, if wholesale costs per unit are higher than predicted, the City may pass through to customers the increase in wholesale water purchase costs. The pass-through will be calculated as an increase in wholesale water purchase costs divided by customer annual volumetric water use. Notice of any adjustment to the pass-through costs will be given not less than 30 days before the effective date of the adjustment. However, no additional Proposition 218 public hearings will be required in connection with the adjustments during the five-year water rates schedule described in this Report.

Finally, in conformance with the existing Fairfield Municipal Code, customers within a portion of the Willotta Oaks subdivision have a history of paying 1-1/2 times the amount of the current City of Fairfield’s water rates. Moving forward, Staff recommends providing for the potential passthrough of increases and charge the same amount as what the City of Vallejo charges the City of Fairfield for water service to those customers within Willotta Oaks.

California Environmental Quality Act
This item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) because CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of water rates under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8). The proposed water rates are proposed to meet operating expenses, purchase necessary supplies and equipment, meet financial reserve needs, and fund capital projects necessary to maintain service within the existing service area. Furthermore, it is not a “project” as defined under California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15378(b)(4). This item is also exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the approval of water rates will not have a significant effect on the environment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
If the 8% annual rate increases are adopted, the high priority water system improvements identified in PUMP would be partially deferred and spread over approximately 9-10 years. The current rates generate minimal revenue to conduct any capital improvement projects and leaves the enterprise fund in an operational deficit (if no rate increases are implemented). After the 5- year phase-in of rate increases, the 8% rate increases will enable the City to fund its projected operating and debt service expenses, and enable the City to accomplish annual rate revenues of approximately $16 million per year for existing and new debt service, and ongoing capital funding needs, leaving approximately $5 million per year to help fund ongoing capital needs (i.e. funding approximately ½ of ongoing future capital funding needs). Without rate increases, the water enterprise funds (461 and 462) are projected to have annual deficits ranging from $12 million to $24 million and a negative working capital by fiscal year 2027-2028.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose not to adopt the resolutions, but in doing so, it would undermine FMU’s future financial security.

COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney’s Office and Finance Department

STAFF CONTACT
Michael J. Hether, Assistant Director of Public Works - Utilities (707) 428-7493
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution 2025-118
Attachment 3: Exhibit B Proposed Resolution 2025-119
Attachment 4: Exhibit A Procedures for Conducting a Public Hearing Attachment 5: Exhibit C Water Rate Study Summary of Findings and Recommendations Attachment 6: Exhibit D Draft Notice of Public Hearing for Proposed Water Rate Adjustments

11245-0001\3120849v2.doc

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-118

AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO DIRECT STAFF TO INITIATE THE PROPOSITION 218 PROCESS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING RELATING TO PROPOSED INCREASES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY’S WATER RATES AND MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL

FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the City of Fairfield has a Municipal Water Utility that provides water services to residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Water Utility operational, maintenance, and capital improvement costs have increased substantially since the last rate increase in 2021, and are estimated to continue increasing significantly; and
WHEREAS, the City’s currently established water rates are not adequate to meet increasing operating, maintenance, and capital improvements costs and required debt service coverage ratios in connection with the City’s water bonds; and WHEREAS, the City’s consultant, Bartle Wells Associates, has conducted a Water Rate Study for the Water Utility Enterprise fundsto ensure the financial health of the Municipal Water Utility; and
WHEREAS, an overview of the water rate study, including recommendationsfor proposed increases and modifications to the City’s water rates, was presented at the June 17, 2025, City Council meeting and the draft Water Rate Study will be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection; and WHEREAS, in order to increase and modify the City’s water rates, the City must comply with Article XIII D of the California Constitution, more commonly known as Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the actions proposed to be taken in connection with the proposed water rates and has determined that those actions are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) because CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of water rates under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8). The proposed water rates are proposed to meet operating expenses, purchase necessary supplies and equipment, meet financial reserve needs, and fund capital projects necessary to maintain service within the existing service area.

Furthermore, the actions are not a “project” as defined under California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15378(b)(4). The actions are also exempt from CEQA

RES. NO. 2025-118

pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the approval of water rates will not have a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The council hereby authorizes and directs staff to initiate the Proposition 218 majority protest process for the proposed increases and modifications to the City’s water rates.

Section 2. The council hereby sets a Public Hearing to consider the proposed increases and modifications to the City’s water rates on November 4, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in the City Council Chamber, or such other date and time selected by the city manager, in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 3. The council hereby authorizes and directs the city clerk, or the city clerk’s designee, to provide a mailed notice of the Public Hearing in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 4. The council hereby authorizes staff of the City to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution and any such actions previously taken by such staff are hereby ratified.

Section 5. City staff has evaluated the actions proposed to be taken in connection with the proposed water rates and has determined that those actions are not subject to CEQA because CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of water rates under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8). The proposed water rates are proposed to meet operating expenses, purchase necessary supplies and equipment, meet financial reserve needs, and fund capital projects necessary to maintain service within the existing service area.

Furthermore, the actions are not a “project” as defined under California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15378(b)(4). The actions are also exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the approval of water rates will not have a significant effect on the environment. The city council concurs with the determinations of staff. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.

RES. NO. 2025-118

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR / PANDURO / SANDHU / TONNESEN / WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-119

ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAJORITY PROTEST PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO PROPOSED INCREASES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY’S

WATER RATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, THE PROPOSITION 218 OMNIBUS IMPLEMENTATION ACT, AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 53759.1 AND 53759.2
WHEREAS, Article XIII D of the California Constitution and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750, et seq.) (Implementation Act) impose certain procedural and substantive requirements for imposing new or increased property-related fees and charges, as defined in Article XIII D (rates), including the requirement to conduct a public hearing and majority protest proceedings for consideration of new or increased rates; and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 53759.1 and 53759.2 provide for an optional exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement in connection with imposing new or increased water rates if the City complies with certain requirements; and WHEREAS, neither Article XIII D of the California Constitution nor the Implementation Act provide specific guidance for the conduct of the public hearing and majority protest proceedings; and WHEREAS, consistent with Article XIII D, the Implementation Act, and Government Code Sections 53759.1 and 53759.2, the City Council desires to adopt procedures for the conduct of a public hearing and majority protest proceedings and provide for an exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement in connection with proposed increases and modifications to the City’s water rates.

NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. In accordance with Article XIII D, the Implementation Act, and Government Code Sections 53759.1 and 53759.2 the council hereby approves the Procedures for the Conduct of a public hearing and majority protest Proceedings Relating to Proposed Increases and Modifications to the City’s Water Rates, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the “Procedures”).

Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17thday of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF A

PUBLIC HEARING AND MAJORITY PROTEST PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO PROPOSED INCREASES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY’S

WATER RATES
The following procedures have been adopted by the City Council of the City of Fairfield for the purpose of conducting a public hearing and majority protest proceedings required by Article XIII D of the California Constitution for consideration of proposed increases and modifications to the City’s water rates and for the purpose of establishing an exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement pursuant to Government Code Sections 54759.1 and 54759.2.

June 17, 2025

11245-0001\3114354v1.doc 1
I. Definitions

1. “Customer of Record” means the person whose name appears on the City’s records as the person who contracted for, and became obligated to pay for, water service for the Identified Parcel, and includes tenants of Identified Parcels who are directly liable to pay the City’s water rates.

2. “Identified Parcel” means the parcel of real property to which the City’s Proposed Water rates will apply.

3. “Proposed Water Rates” means the City’s water rates, as proposed to be increased and modified.

4. “Record Owner” means the owner of an Identified Parcel whose name and address appears on the last Solano County equalized secured property tax assessment roll (the “Assessment Roll”), or in the case of any public entity, the State of California, or the United States, means the representative of that public entity at the address of that entity known to the City.

5. “Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Requirement” means the written objection requirement under Section III.

II. Conduct of Public Hearing - Majority Protest Proceedings A. Eligibility to File a Written Protest

1. Any Customer of Record or Record Owner may file a written protest against the Proposed Water Rates.

2. If the owner of an Identified Parcel is not shown on the Assessment Roll, such owner may file a written protest for such parcel by filing with the City Clerk a proxy from the Record Owner in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney or evidence of ownership satisfactory to the City Attorney. Any such proxy or evidence must be received by the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on the Proposed Water Rates (“Public Hearing”).

3. When an Identified Parcel is held by a partnership, as community property, in joint tenancy, or as a tenancy in common, any partner, spouse, joint tenant, or tenant in common, as the case may be, may file a written protest for such parcel.

4. An executor, administrator, or guardian may file a written protest for an Identified Parcel on behalf of the estate it represents. If such representative is shown on the Assessment Roll as paying taxes and assessments levied against the parcel, that fact shall establish the right of such representative to file the written protest. If such representative is not shown on the Assessment Roll, the representative must file with the City Clerk written

documentation satisfactory to the City Attorney establishing the legal representation. Any such documentation must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

5. When the Customer of Record is, or an Identified Parcel is held by, a corporation or unincorporated association, a written protest may be filed by any person authorized in writing by the board of directors or trustees or other managing body thereof to take such action. The corporation or unincorporated association must file with the City Clerk written authorization satisfactory to the City Attorney. Any such written authorization must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

B. Submission of Written Protests

1. Written protests against the Proposed Water Rates must be emailed, mailed or delivered in person to the City Clerk at City Hall or delivered in person to the city clerk at the public hearing prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

2. To be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest against the Proposed Water Rates (“Majority Protest”), each written protest must: (i) clearly state opposition to the Proposed Water Rates, (ii) identify the property(ies) covered by the protest either by street address(es), assessor’s parcel number(s), or other clear identification of the property(ies); and (iii) include the legibly printed name and a signature of the Customer of Record or Record Owner that is filing the written protest. No protest submitted orally or by fax will be counted in determining the existence of a Majority Protest.

A separate written protest may be submitted for each Identified Parcel, or a written protest may be submitted that identifies multiple Identified Parcels.

3. No protest received after the close of the public hearing shall be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest. The last pick-up by the city clerk of protests emailed, mailed or delivered to the city clerk at City Hall will occur at 5 p.m. on the date scheduled for the public hearing. To ensure that protests which are emailed, mailed or delivered to the city clerk at City Hall are received by the city clerk prior to the close of the public hearing, such protests must be received by the city clerk at City Hall prior to 5 p.m. on the date scheduled for the public hearing. The city clerk shall endorse on each written protest the date it is filed with the City. The city clerk shall identify any written protests which are received after the closure of the public hearing.

4. Written protests may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing by the person who submitted the written protest.

C. Conduct of the Public Hearing; Determination of the Existence of a Majority Protest

1. At the time, date and place fixed for the public hearing, the council shall:

Hear a staff presentation pertaining to the proposed water rates.

Hear all persons interested in the matter of the proposed Water rates; and
Receive all written protests regarding the proposed water rates.

2. The existence of a majority protest will be determined for the proposed water rates. For the purpose of determining whether a majority protest exists, only one written protest for each Identified Parcel will be counted. This means that if a Customer of Record and a Record Owner each file a written protest with respect to the same parcel, only one written protest will be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest.

3. The public hearing may be continued from time to time, as the council determines is necessary to complete its consideration of the proposed water rates.

4. If the council determines at the close of the public hearing that valid written protests have been presented, and not withdrawn, representing over 50% of the Identified Parcels subject to the proposed water rates, then the council shall not approve the proposed water rates.

5. If the council determines at the close of the public hearing that a majority protest does not exist, then the council may adopt the Proposed Water Rates.

III. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Requirement
A. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Procedures
If the City complies with the procedures described in subparagraphs (1) through (6) of this Paragraph A prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, a person or entity shall be prohibited from bringing a judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance of the proposed water rates with Article XIII D of the California Constitution, unless that person or entity has timely submitted to the City a written objection to the proposed water rates that specifies the grounds for alleging noncompliance:

1. Make available to the public the proposed water rates no less than 45 days prior to the deadline for a ratepayer to submit a written objection, as established by the City pursuant to subparagraph 4.

2. Posts on its internet website a written basis for the proposed water rates and include a link to the internet website in the written notice of the public hearing.

3. Mails the written basis for the proposed water rates to a property owner upon request.

4. Provides at least 45 days for a property owner to review the proposed water rates and to timely submit to the City a written objection to the Proposed Water Rates that specifies the grounds for alleging noncompliance.

5. Considers and responds in writing, including the grounds for which a challenge is not resulting in amendments to the proposed water rates, to any timely submitted written objections prior to the closing of the public hearing.

The City’s response shall explain the substantive basis for retaining or altering the proposed water rates in response to the written objection. Timely submitted written objections and City responses shall be presented to the council for consideration prior to or during the public hearing.

6. Includes in the written notice of the public hearing, a prominently displayed statement that contains the following information:

That all written objections must be submitted within the written objection period set by the City and that a failure to timely object in writing bars any right to challenge the proposed water rates through a legal proceeding.

All substantive and procedural requirements for submitting a written objection to the proposed water rates.

B. City Council Responses
In exercising its legislative discretion, the council shall determine any of the following:

1. Whether the written objections and the council’s response warrant clarifications to the proposed water rates.

2. Whether to reduce the proposed water rates.

3. Whether to further review before making a determination on whether clarification or reduction is needed.

4. Whether to proceed with the public hearing.

C. Submission of Written Objections

1. Written objections must be emailed or mailed to the city clerk at City Hall or delivered in person to the city clerk at City Hall and must be received by 5 p.m. on the day of the deadline for submitting written objections established by the City pursuant to subparagraph 4 of Paragraph A.

2. Each written objection must clearly specify the grounds for alleging noncompliance of the proposed water rates with Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

2025 Water Rate Study
Summary of Findings & Recommendations
& Selected Tables
City of Fairfield

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 1
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
City of Fairfield
Water Rate Study
Summary of Findings & Recommendations
Background
 The City of Fairfield provides water service to roughly 120,000 residents and 2,000 commercial, institutional and industrial customers via approximately 33,700 metered water connections.

Residential customers account for a little over 90% of total connections and about 60% of total annual water use.
 The City owns and operates a water distribution system that includes over 375 miles of pipelines, 12 water storage tanks with a combined capacity of 78 million gallons, and 14 pump stations.

Sources of water supply include untreated water purchased from Solano County Water Agency and the State Water Project (via Solano Irrigation District). The City operates two water treatment plants including the Waterman Water Treatment Plant and the North Bay Regional Treatment Plant, which is jointly owned by the Cities of Fairfield and Vacaville. Many facilities are old and will need to be rehabilitated and/or replaced in upcoming years.

Water Rates & Finances
 The City has not implemented any water rate increases since January 2021, almost 4-1/2 years ago. Water rates from 2021 are still in eƯect despite substantial increases in operating expenses and capital funding needs of the City’s aging water system infrastructure.  Fairfield’s water rates are currently among the lowest in the region based on a survey of 16 regional water agencies. The monthly water bill for a typical single family home using 10 hundred cubic feet (hcf) of water (about 250 gallons per day) is $54.00, which is about 30% below the regional average of $76.65.
 The City’s water utility is a self-supporting enterprise that relies predominantly on revenues from water rates to fund the costs of providing service. As such, rates need to be set at adequate levels to support operations, maintenance, and capital improvements needed to support safe and reliable service.
 Fairfield historically provided strong financial management via adoption of small annual water rate adjustments to keep revenues in line with the cost of providing service. However, the City temporarily stopped raising rates after 2021 as it was embarking on an updated water master plan to evaluate the condition of water system infrastructure and identify capital improvement funding needs.
 The water master plan (aka PUMP) was recently completed by West Yost, a water resource management and engineering firm, and adopted by City Council in May, 2025. PUMP identifies over $340 million of capital improvements to address existing system deficiencies, replace aging infrastructure, and support safe and reliable service.

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 2
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
Water Rate Study
 In conjunction with the development of the PUMP water master plan, Bartle Wells Associates (BWA) was retained to develop an updated water rate study. Key goals of the rate study include:
 Develop updated water enterprise financial projections to identify future funding needs and evaluate rate increases
 Evaluate the City’s water rates and recommend modifications to improve the rate structure and reflect the cost of providing service
 Develop updated water rates that:
a. recover the City’s costs of providing water service
b. are fair and equitable to all customers
c. are easy to understand and implement
d. comply with the legal requirements of Proposition 218 and other California law e. provide adequate funding for capital improvement needs including high-priority nearterm needs and long-term rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure  Aim for steady, gradual annual rate increases to the extent possible in order to help minimize the annual impact on ratepayers while supporting the funding needs of the City’s water enterprise.
 BWA worked closely with City staƯ throughout the rate study process to evaluate alternatives and develop rate recommendations for the next 5 years.

Key Factors Impacting Rate Increases
 Key factors impacting the need for rate increases include:
 Operating Cost Inflation – The City has experienced substantial increases in operating and maintenance expenses over the past 4+ years with no corresponding rate increases. Costs have increased for staƯing, materials, electricity, insurance, PERS funding requirements, and professional services. Utilities historically face higher inflationary cost increases than CPI, which more a measure of consumer inflation. The proposed rates are designed to both catch up with cost inflation from recent years and account for projected operating cost inflation in future years.
 Capital Improvement Needs of Aging Facilities – Like many regional agencies, the City has a lot of aging water infrastructure that will require rehabilitation and replacement in upcoming years. Many of the City’s water pipelines have been in service from 50 to over 80 years and have reached or are approaching the end of their useful lives. Other infrastructure, including both water treatment plants, are old and in need of substantial improvements to address existing deficiencies and support safe and reliable service.

The recently-completed PUMP water master plan identifies $341 million of capital improvements (in current $) needed over the next 25 years including $147 million of highpriority near-term needs recommended for completion over the next 5-6 years (through 2030) and $194 million of longer-term funding needs over the subsequent 20 years.

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 3
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
The $147 million of near-term funding needs include almost $80 million of water system storage and distribution improvements, $15 million of Waterman Treatment Plant improvements, and $53 million for Fairfield’s share of capital needs for upgrading and expanding the aging North Bay Regional (NBR) Water Treatment Plant.  Support Compliance with Debt Service Legal Covenants– The deferral of rate increases in recent years has diminished the City’s ability to meet debt service coverage covenants that secure outstanding water debt. The City is legally obligated to increase water rates to maintain compliance with its debt covenants.

Financial & Rate Projections
 Bartle Wells Associates worked closely with City staƯ to develop updated water enterprise financial projections to identify funding needs and evaluate rate increases. The projections incorporate the latest financial information and engineering cost estimates for capital improvement needs. After almost 4-1/2 years since rates were last adjusted, the City needs to resume raising water rates to support its operating, capital and debt service funding needs.  BWA developed 3 financial and rate scenarios diƯerentiated by the level of water system capital improvement funding targeted over the next 5 years. All scenarios assume the City would draw down a substantial amount of fund reserves to help fund near-term capital needs while rate increase are phased in. All scenarios also assume issuance of debt in the next 4 to 5 years to support $50-$60 million of capital needs including Fairfield’s share of cost for rehabilitation and expansion of the North Bay Regional (NBR) Water Treatment Plant. Costs of NBR expansion are projected to be repaid in future years by new development.  All scenarios assume projected rate increases are phased in over 5 years to help minimize the annual impact on ratepayers. The alternative would be a substantially larger up-front rate increase.
 After proposed rates are fully phased in over 5 years, the City can re-evaluate future funding needs and rate increases for subsequent years. In general, more rate increases over the next 5 years will result in the subsequent need for less rate increases in future years, and vice versa.

Near-Term Long-Term Total
2025 - 2030 2031 - 2050 2025 - 2050
City Water System Improvements $93.7 $193.2 $286.9
NBR Water Treatment Plant 53.1 1.0 54.1 ______ ______ ______ Total 146.8 194.2 341.0
Note: Project costs are shown in current dollars and exclude construction cost inflation.

PUMP Water Master Plan Capital Improvement Projects (Millions $)

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 4
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
 Scenario A: Fully Support PUMP Capital Funding Needs
This scenario supports projected operating expenses and completion of $94 million (current $) of near-term, high-priority water system improvements and Fairfield’s $53 million (current $) share of NBR water treatment plant rehabilitation and expansion as recommended in the PUMP water master plan for completion over the next roughly 5 years through 2029/30. After the 5-year phase in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support average annual long-term funding needs of approximately $10 million per year (current $) as identified in PUMP to address ongoing future funding needs for rehabilitation and replacement.
 Scenario B: Reduced Rate Increases & Deferred PUMP Capital Funding This scenario assumes 5-year, high-priority water system improvements identified in the PUMP water master plan are partially deferred and instead spread over approximately 7-8 years resulting in reduced capital funding levels. After the 5-year phase in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support approximately $8 million (current $) per year of annual funding needed to help address longer-term capital funding needs.  Scenario C: Minimum Recommended Rate Increases
This scenario assumes 5-year, high-priority water system improvements identified in the Master Plan are partially deferred and instead spread over approximately 9-10 years resulting in further reduced capital funding levels. After the 5-year phase in of rate increases, the City’s water rates would support approximately $5 million per year of annual funding needed to address ongoing, longer-term capital funding needs.

While this scenario supports substantially less than the funding levels recommended in the PUMP master plan over the next 5 years, this scenario supports substantial steps in the right direction. As noted, with less increases over the next 5 years, additional rate increases would be needed in future years to support completion of the near-term PUMP master plan projects and eventually also support long-term capital needs. The level of rate increases in this scenario is recommended as the minimum prudent level of rate increases needed over the next 5 years.

Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
12% 12% 12% 10% 10%
Scenario A: Projected Rate Increases
Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Scenario B: Projected Rate Increases
Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Scenario C: Projected Rate Increases

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 5
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
Water Rate Increase Recommendation: Scenario C
 Based on evaluation and input from City staƯ, rate increases under Scenario C: Minimum Recommended Rate Increases are proposed for Council consideration. While the water enterprise would be able to more aggressively address its capital funding needs with Scenarios A or B, the level of rate increase in Scenario C balances the competing objectives of a) providing adequate funding for operating and capital needs, and b) minimizing the impact on ratepayers and keeping rates as aƯordable as possible.
 Rate increases are projected to become eƯective starting January 1, 2026, a full 5 years after rates were last increased. The proposed phase-in of 8% overall annual rate increases for the next 5 years results in rates that are equivalent to the City’s 2021 rates with 4.37% annual escalation.

Hence, with full implementation of proposed rate increases, the City’s water rates will be only little higher than if the City had continued with 4% annual rate adjustments since rates were last increased in 2021.

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 6
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
Water Rate Structure Recommendations
 The City’s water rate structure has not been independently reviewed or updated in many years.

Based on review of existing rates, BWA generally recommends cleaning up, simplifying, and standardizing the City’s water rates, realigning rates with cost of service, and charging the rates consistently for all water customers.
 BWA developed updated water rates based on a cost-of-service analysis that accounts for both a) the recommended 8% overall annual water rate increases, and b) a number of proposed modifications to the City’s water rate structure and related billing practices.  The proposed rate structure modifications would be implemented concurrently with the firstyear rate increase on January 1, 2026. This will result in first-year rate impacts that will vary for each customer based on their customer class and amount of water use. After the rate structure adjustments are implemented the first year, future rate increases starting January 1, 2027 would be applied on an across-the-board basis with the same percentage rate increases for all customers.
 Proposed water rates include:
o Fixed Service Charges billed per residential dwelling unit or based on each non-residential customer’s meter size. The city’s Fixed Service Charges are billed per day in each billing period independent of the amount of water used and help recover the City’s fixed costs of providing service.
o Volume Charges based on metered water use. The City’s Volume Charges are billed per hundred cubic feet (hcf) with 1 hcf equal to approximately 748 gallons. o A small number of customers pay elevation zone or hydropneumatics pump surcharges to account for the additional costs of pumping to these zones. o The City bills monthly for water service.
 Key water rate structure recommendations are summarizes as follows.

Fixed Service Charge Recommendations
o Residential Accounts: Maintain fixed charges per residential dwelling unit. o Non-Residential Accounts: BWA recommends the non-residential accounts including commercial, institutional and irrigation customers, BWAransition to a uniform set of fixed charges by meter size, with one charge for each meter size proportionally based on meter capacity. This will result in lower fixed charges for a relatively small number of customers with larger meters. The City no longer has need for diƯerent fixed charges for diƯerent types of meters as almost all of the City’s turbine meters have been replaced by single-jet meters. o Irrigation Accounts: Unlike other customer classes, irrigation customers (including customers currently classified as Irrigation, Special Landscape Irrigation, and Reclaimed Landscape Irrigation) currently are not billed any Fixed Charges and instead pay Volume Charges which are set a slightly higher rate than General Service commercial rates. BWA recommends transitioning to charging all customers a standard set of fixed and volumetric water rates. This would result in irrigation customers starting to pay Fixed Monthly Charges consistent with other customer classes. At the same time, irrigation customers would only be charged the same Volume Charges as other customers (not higher charges), which will partially oƯset the impact of starting to pay Fixed Charges.

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 7
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
Volume Charge Recommendations for Metered Water Use
o Uniform Rate for Residential and Non-Residential Water Use: The City’s Volume Charges currently vary a little based on customer class. BWA recommends the City transition to a uniform rate for all potable water use for Residential and Non-Residential customers (including commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts) o Residential Pumping Zone Charges: BWA updated these surcharges based on analysis of the costs of pumping to higher elevation zones. In addition to updating the charges, BWA recommends consolidation of the two higher residential elevation zone rate classes into a single class, particularly since less than 5 accounts are in one of the zones. o Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharges: BWA updated these surcharges based on analysis of the costs of pumping water to higher elevation and pressure zones.

Other Water Rate Structure Recommendations
o Large Industrial Rates for Anheuser Busch: Large Industrial customer class charges for Anheuser Busch were updated and reflect only very minor adjustments from current charges.

However, Anheuser Busch would be subject to the same overall water rate increases as all other City customers.
o Unbilled Accounts: Some accounts have historically not been billed for water service.

Pursuant to legal requirements established by Proposition 218, BWA believes the City needs to start billing these accounts to help ensure that costs funded by other customers do not exceed their proportionate cost of service.
o Willotta Oaks Subdivision Pass-Through Charges: 33 homes in the Willotta Oaks Subdivision receive water service from Vallejo’s Lake Area water system but are currently customers of Fairfield pursuant to a legal agreement from the 1970s. Fairfield pays Vallejo for providing water service to these customers based on Vallejo’s Lake Area water rates. In turn, Fairfield bills these customers at significantly lower rates set at 150% of Fairfield’s general service charges pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code, resulting in a revenue shortfall for serving the Willotta Oaks Subdivision customers.

BWA recommends that Fairfield’s customers in the Willotta Oaks Subdivision be transitioned to become customers of Vallejo, which serves as the customers’ water service provider. Until this transition takes place, BWA recommends the City bill customers in Willotta Oaks charges that reflect the cost of service by passing through Vallejo’s charges for water service to these accounts. Authorization for this pass-through would need to be authorized via the Proposition 218 process.

BWA also recommends the City review the historical agreement with Vallejo to confirm if Vallejo’s charges comply with the agreement’s provisions in order to ensure that Fairfield is not being overcharged.
o Pass-Through Authorization for Wholesale Water Charges: The City purchases untreated wholesale water supply from the Solano County Water Agency (SCWA) and Solano Irrigation District (SID). Wholesale water charges from these agencies may be subject to unanticipated increases that are outside the City’s control. To provide financial projection for these unanticipated cost increases, BWA recommends the City authorize the ability to pass through future adopted increases in wholesale water supply charges via the Proposition 218 process.

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 8
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
The financial and rate projections already account for 4% annual increases in operating costs including the costs of wholesale water supply. As such, the pass through would only apply to increases in the weighted average wholesale water supply charges per hundred cubic feet adopted by SCWA and SID in excess of 4% per year. The pass through would be calculated as a charge per hundred cubic feet of water that would be in addition to the adopted charge in eƯect and would be applied consistently to all of the City’s Water Volume Charges other than Reclaimed Landscape Irrigation Rates.

Rate Impacts & Economic Hardship Discount
 The following table shows a projection of monthly residential bills with the proposed rate increases. Note that the first year rate increase accounts for both an overall rate increase as well as a number of rate structure modifications, resulting in a range of impacts the first year that can vary based on customer class and water use.
 With the proposed rate increases, the City’s water rates are projected to remain in the lowerrange compared to other regional agencies. Other regional agencies have adopted or are anticipating water rate increases in upcoming years.
 Economic Hardship Discount: City oƯers a water rate discount of $158 per year, equal to about $13.17 per month. Eligibility is based on Very Low Income Limits for Solano County established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City has historically adjusted the discount roughly corresponding with the level of adopted water rate increases. BWA recommends the City continue to increase the discount corresponding with the City’s future water rate increases.

Percentile Monthly Current
of Use Monthly Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Bills (hcf) Bill 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Overall Rate Increases 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Single Family Residential Bills
Low 25% 4 $39.30 $42.79 $46.11 $49.80 $53.89 $58.05
Median 50% 7 46.65 51.16 55.14 59.55 64.42 69.42
Average 67% 10 54.00 59.53 64.17 69.30 74.95 80.79
2x Average Top 10% 20 78.50 87.43 94.27 101.80 110.05 118.69 Projected Monthly Bills
Scenario C - Minimum Recommended Rate Increases

BA RT LE WE L LS ASS OC IATE S 9
City of Fairfield - Water Rate Study Summary
Schedule of Proposed Water Rates
DRAFT
Current
Water Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Rates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Residential Units
Per Dwelling Unit 39,867 $0.97 $1.04 $1.12 $1.21 $1.31 $1.41 Monthly Equiv (30 days) 29.10 31.20 33.60 36.30 39.30 42.30 Non-Residential Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Meter Size Accounts
Up to 3/4" 1,247 $1.46 $1.56 $1.68 $1.82 $1.97 $2.12
1" 574 2.55 2.60 2.80 3.03 3.28 3.53 1-1/2" 430 5.63 5.20 5.60 6.05 6.55 7.05 2" 334 9.91 8.32 8.96 9.68 10.48 11.28 3" 94 22.33 16.64 17.92 19.36 20.96 22.56 4" 36 39.59 26.00 28.00 30.25 32.75 35.25 6" 9 89.09 52.00 56.00 60.50 65.50 70.50 8" 0 158.76 83.20 89.60 96.80 104.80 112.80 Large Industrial 1 1,699.94 1,825.68 1,971.73 2,129.47 2,299.83 2,483.82 Residential Zones 1-2 $2.45 $2.79 $3.01 $3.25 $3.51 $3.79
Zones 3-5 3.04 - 3.63 3.82 4.13 4.46 4.82 5.21 Non-Residential 2.59 - 3.05 2.79 3.01 3.25 3.51 3.79 Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.40 0.68 0.73 0.79 0.85 0.92 Large Industrial 1.99 1.84 2.15 2.32 2.51 2.71 ECONOMIC HARDSHIP DISCOUNT Eligibility based on US Dept of Housing & Urban Development Very Low Income Limits for Solano County Annual Discount/Rebate $158.00 $171.00 $185.00 $200.00 $216.00 $233.00 * 1 hundred cubic feet (hcf) = approximately 748 gallons Note: Rates for customers outside City of Fairfield boundaries in the Willotta Oaks Subdivision shall not exceed the costs of service based on rates adopted by the City of Vallejo.

Proposed Water Rates
Proposed Rates Effective

FIXED SERVICE CHARGES
Fixed service charges per day

VOLUME CHARGES
Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet)*

17.45 21.13 23.39 29.50 31.83 24.40 13.07 34.34 29.14 29.46 34.30 29.35 28.59 35.02 26.56 53.28 48.00 17.50 18.32 19.60 24.50 25.10 37.80 50.10 30.50 47.16 53.57 51.60 62.80 66.40 60.20 77.84 57.28 74.30

34.95 39.45

42.99 54.00 56.93

62.20 63.17 64.84

76.30 83.03 85.90

92.15 94.99 95.22
104.40
110.56
122.30
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150
Fixed Monthly Charges
Water Usage Charges
Survey of Single Family Residential Monthly Water Charges Base meter size with 10 hcf of monthly water use
Rates Effective January 2025
* Agencies located in Solano County
Survey assumes rates for lowest elevation zone when applicable.

Many other agencies previously adopted or are anticipating rate increases in upcoming years.

Average of All Agencies Surveyed: $76.65
Current Avg of Solano County Agencies: $68.43

10 Table 1 No Rate Increases Since January 2021
City of Fairfield
Historidal Water Rates
July 1 July 1 July 1 July 1 Jan 1 Jan 1 Jan 1 Jan 1
2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 2021
Rate Increase % 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
FIXED SERVICE CHARGES Currently Monthly
Fixed service charges per day per Residential dwelling unit or based on meter size in effect Charge Residential (30 Days)
Per Dwelling Unit $0.77 $0.79 $0.81 $0.83 $0.86 $0.89 $0.93 $0.97 $29.10 Monthly Equivalent (30 days) 23.10 23.70 24.30 24.90 25.80 26.70 27.90 29.10 General Service
Meter Size Meter Type
5/8" to 3/4" Displacement $1.16 $1.19 $1.22 $1.25 $1.30 $1.35 $1.40 $1.46 $43.80 1" Displacement 2.03 2.08 2.13 2.18 2.27 2.36 2.45 2.55 76.50 1-1/2" Displacement 4.47 4.58 4.69 4.81 5.00 5.20 5.41 5.63 168.90 2" Compound 7.86 8.06 8.26 8.47 8.81 9.16 9.53 9.91 297.30 1-1/2" Turbine 13.05 13.35 13.68 14.02 14.58 15.16 15.77 16.40 492.00 2" Turbine 17.73 18.17 18.62 19.09 19.85 20.64 21.47 22.33 669.90 3" Compound 17.73 18.17 18.62 19.09 19.85 20.64 21.47 22.33 669.90 4" Compound 31.52 32.21 33.02 33.85 35.20 36.61 38.07 39.59 1,187.70 3" Turbine 47.24 48.42 49.63 50.87 52.90 55.02 57.22 59.51 1,785.30 6" Compound 70.71 72.48 74.29 76.15 79.20 82.37 85.66 89.09 2,672.70 8" Compound 126.01 129.16 132.39 135.70 141.13 146.78 152.65 158.76 4,762.80 4" Turbine 168.28 172.49 176.80 181.22 188.47 196.01 203.85 212.00 6,360.00 10" Compound 199.26 204.24 209.35 214.58 223.16 232.09 241.37 251.02 7,530.60 6" Turbine 389.19 398.92 408.89 419.11 435.87 453.30 471.43 490.29 14,708.70 8" Turbine 766.23 785.39 805.02 825.15 858.16 892.49 928.19 965.32 28,959.60 10" Turbine 1,323.54 1,356.63 1,390.55 1,425.31 1,482.32 1,541.61 1,603.27 1,667.40 50,022.00 Large Industrial
Per Unit 1,363.62 1,397.71 1,432.65 1,468.47 1,511.24 1,571.69 1,634.56 1,699.94 50,998.20 VOLUME CHARGES Equivalent
Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet or hcf) Charge per Residential 100 gallons
Zones 1-2 $1.95 $2.00 $2.05 $2.10 $2.18 $2.27 $2.36 $2.45 $0.33 Zones 3-4 2.42 2.48 2.54 2.60 2.70 2.81 2.92 3.04 0.41
Zones 5+ 2.89 2.96 3.03 3.11 3.23 3.36 3.49 3.63 0.49
General Service 2.06 2.11 2.16 2.21 2.30 2.39 2.49 2.59 0.35 Hydroneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.05 Large Industrial 1.51 1.47 1.55 1.57 1.63 1.70 1.77 1.84 0.25 Irrigation 2.49 2.43 2.55 2.61 2.71 2.82 2.93 3.05 0.41 Special Landscape Irrigation 2.16 2.11 2.21 2.27 2.36 2.45 2.55 2.65 0.35 Reclaimed Landscape Irrigation 2.00 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.18 2.27 2.36 2.45 0.33 ECONOMIC HARDSHIP DISCOUNT Monthly
Eligibility based on 2016 HUD Very Low Income Limits for Solano County Discount Annual Discount/Rebate $135.00 $140.00 $146.00 $152.00 $158.00 $13.17 Historical Water Rates

11 Table 2
City of Fairfield
PUMP Water Master Plan CIP Summary
Near-Term Long-Term Total
2025 - 2030 2031 - 2050 2025 - 2050
PUMP Water Master Plan CIP Summary (Current $)
City Water System
Adopted City Capital Budget $62,596,000 $60,450,000 $123,046,000 Waterman Water Treatment Plant 15,208,000 1,641,000 16,849,000 Storage Reservoirs 1,706,000 5,968,000 7,674,000
Water Distribution System 500,000 103,029,000 103,529,000 Service Laterals 9,234,000 14,153,000 23,387,000
Transmission Valves 1,500,000 5,000,000 6,500,000
Pump Stations 2,937,000 2,948,000 5,885,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 93,681,000 193,189,000 286,870,000
NBR Water Treatment Plant
City of Fairfield Share of Costs Only
Condition/Perf Improvements (2/3rds of ttl) 31,700,000 1,014,000 32,714,000 Plant Expansion (3.0 mgd share for Fairfield) 21,400,000 - 21,400,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 53,100,000 1,014,000 54,114,000
Total (Current $) 146,781,000 194,203,000 340,984,000
Costs shown in current $ and exclude future construction cost inflation.

Costs shown for Adopted City Capital Budget are net of anticipated grants

12 Table 3
City of Fairfield
Comparison of Financial & Rate Scenarios
Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C
Fully Support PUMP Reduced Rate Increases & Minimum Recommended Capital Funding Needs Deferred PUMP Capital Funding Rate Increases 12% 12% 12% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
6 Years (Includes Current FY) 8 Years (Includes Current FY) 10 Years (Includes Current FY) Through FY 2029/30 Through FY 2031/32 Through FY 2033/24 Drawdown of Fund Reserves Drawdown of Fund Reserves Drawdown of Fund Reserves $50.7 Million $41.9 Million $40.3 Million
New Debt Financing New Debt Financing New Debt Financing $60.0 Million $50.0 Million $50.0 Million
Pay-As-You-Go Rate Funding Pay-As-You-Go Rate Funding Pay-As-You-Go Rate Funding $33.0 Million $25.1 Million $14.4 Million
Total Capital Funding Total Capital Funding Total Capital Funding $143.7 Million $117.0 Million $104.7 Million
(Annual Revenues Less Operating & Debt Service Expenses) $11.7 Million (in 5 Years) $9.3 Million (in 5 Years) $5.0 Million (in 5 Years) $10.1 Million (Current $) $8.1 Million (Current $) $4.3 Million (Current $) Sources of Capital Funding Over Next 5 Years (FY 2025/26 - FY 2029/30) Annual Rate Increases
Annual CIP Funding Supported by Rates With 5-Year Phase In Through FY 2029/30 Effective January 1 each year 2026 - 2030
5-Year High-Priority PUMP Capital Projects Completed Over

13 Table 4
City of Fairfield
Single Family Monthly Bill Comparison
Percentile Monthly Current
of Use Monthly Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Bills (hcf) Bill 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Overall Rate Increases 12% 12% 12% 10% 10%
Single Family Residential Bills
Low 25% 4 $39.30 $44.45 $49.80 $55.93 $61.63 $67.79
Median 50% 7 46.65 53.15 59.55 66.85 73.63 80.99
Average 67% 10 54.00 61.85 69.30 77.77 85.63 94.19
2x Average Top 10% 20 78.50 90.85 101.80 114.17 125.63 138.19 Overall Rate Increases 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Single Family Residential Bills
Low 25% 4 $39.30 $43.60 $48.07 $52.96 $58.27 $64.05
Median 50% 7 46.65 52.12 57.43 63.25 69.58 76.50
Average 67% 10 54.00 60.64 66.79 73.54 80.89 88.95
2x Average Top 10% 20 78.50 89.04 97.99 107.84 118.59 130.45 Overall Rate Increases 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Single Family Residential Bills
Low 25% 4 $39.30 $42.79 $46.11 $49.80 $53.89 $58.05
Median 50% 7 46.65 51.16 55.14 59.55 64.42 69.42
Average 67% 10 54.00 59.53 64.17 69.30 74.95 80.79
2x Average Top 10% 20 78.50 87.43 94.27 101.80 110.05 118.69 Projected Monthly Bills
Scenario A - Fully Support PUMP Capital Funding Needs
Scenario B - Reduced Rate Increases & Deferred PUMP Capital Funding Scenario C - Minimum Recommended Rate Increases

14 Scenario A
Rate Increases: 12% 12% 12% 10% 10%
Fund 2025 PUMP Water Master Plan Projects on Schedule
$53M (current $) NBR Conditions Improvement & Expansion in Years 4 & 5 $94M (current $) of High-Priority Water System CIP Through Current + Next 5 Years Fully Support PUMP Capital Funding Needs
Assumes $60 Million Debt Issuance in 2028/29 to help fund NBR Improvements & Water System CIP
Assumes $50 Million Drawdown of Water Fund Reserves Through 2029/30 and $18 Million Drawdown of NBR Maint/Repl Reserves
Rate Increases Support Full Funding of Long-Term Average Annual Master Plan CIP After 5 Years

15 Table 5A Years 1 - 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cost Esc 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 Effective Date of Rate Increases tbd Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Overall Rate Adjustment % 0.0% 12% 12% 12% 10% 10% 4% 3% 3% 3% Annual % Change in Water Sales 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Interest Earnings Rate 4.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Beginning Fund Balances $83,157,000 $75,608,000 $58,437,000 $43,949,000 $32,106,000 $31,808,000 $32,453,000 $33,038,000 $34,138,000 $35,185,000

REVENUES
Water Rate Revenues 34,800,000 38,050,000 42,616,000 47,730,000 53,001,000 58,301,000 62,474,000 64,685,000 66,626,000 68,625,000 Construction Rate Revenues 200,000 212,000 237,000 265,000 294,000 323,000 346,000 358,000 369,000 380,000 Investment Income 3,326,000 2,268,000 1,461,000 879,000 642,000 636,000 649,000 661,000 683,000 704,000 Connection Fees 3.0% 3,000,000 3,090,000 3,183,000 3,278,000 3,376,000 3,477,000 3,581,000 3,688,000 3,799,000 3,913,000 Other/Miscellaneous 3.0% 1,100,000 1,133,000 1,167,000 1,202,000 1,238,000 1,275,000 1,313,000 1,352,000 1,393,000 1,435,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Total Revenues 42,426,000 44,753,000 48,664,000 53,354,000 58,551,000 64,012,000 68,363,000 70,744,000 72,870,000 75,057,000 Projected Debt Proceeds 30,000,000 30,000,000

EXPENSES
Operating & Maintenance Budget Budget+ Budget+
Personnel 4.0% 11,689,000 11,374,000 11,884,000 12,359,000 12,853,000 13,367,000 13,902,000 14,458,000 15,036,000 15,637,000 Addl Staffing (Needed for CIP) 4.0% 0 300,000 600,000 624,000 649,000 675,000 702,000 730,000 759,000 789,000 Operating Materials/Supplies 4.0% 3,012,000 3,817,000 3,811,000 3,963,000 4,122,000 4,287,000 4,458,000 4,636,000 4,821,000 5,014,000 Repairs & Maintenance 4.0% 3,052,000 3,387,000 3,370,000 3,505,000 3,645,000 3,791,000 3,943,000 4,101,000 4,265,000 4,436,000 Utilities 4.0% 1,384,000 1,952,000 2,029,000 2,110,000 2,194,000 2,282,000 2,373,000 2,468,000 2,567,000 2,670,000 Internal Service Charges 4.0% 5,496,000 5,822,000 6,032,000 6,273,000 6,524,000 6,785,000 7,056,000 7,338,000 7,632,000 7,937,000 Capital Outlay & Vehicle Maint 4.0% 879,000 879,000 879,000 914,000 951,000 989,000 1,029,000 1,070,000 1,113,000 1,158,000 ContractuaI Svcs & Other Expenses 4.0% 2,195,000 3,641,000 3,041,000 3,163,000 3,290,000 3,422,000 3,559,000 3,701,000 3,849,000 4,003,000 Expense Credits for NBR Admin 4.0% (754,000) (916,000) (916,000) (953,000) (991,000) (1,031,000) (1,072,000) (1,115,000) (1,160,000) (1,206,000) Fairfield Share of NBR O&M (no CIP) 4.0% 5,950,000 5,916,000 6,109,000 6,353,000 6,607,000 6,871,000 7,146,000 7,432,000 7,729,000 8,038,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 32,903,000 36,172,000 36,839,000 38,311,000 39,844,000 41,438,000 43,096,000 44,819,000 46,611,000 48,476,000 Debt Service
2007 Water Certificates 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 2017 Water Revenue Bonds 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,355,000 1,356,000 1,355,000 1,359,000 1,357,000 1,355,000 1,355,000 Projected 2028 Bonds (5%, 30-Yr, 1.5Yrs Int Only) - - - - 1,518,000 3,036,000 4,010,000 4,010,000 4,010,000 4,010,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,835,000 9,354,000 10,871,000 11,849,000 11,847,000 11,845,000 11,845,000 Capital Improvements Long-Term Annual CIP Target
Water System Capital Projects 3.0% 8,000,000 17,650,000 18,180,000 18,725,000 19,287,000 19,865,000 11,600,000 11,948,000 12,306,000 12,675,000 Fairfield Share of NBR CIP 3.0% 1,000,000 1,030,000 1,061,000 1,093,000 27,631,000 28,460,000 1,000,000 1,030,000 1,061,000 1,093,000 Drawdown of City's NBR Repl Rsrvs tbd (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (7,500,000) (7,500,000) 0 0 0 0 Repayment of Loan from NBR Rsrvs 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 0 0 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 9,233,000 17,913,000 18,474,000 19,051,000 39,651,000 41,058,000 12,833,000 12,978,000 13,367,000 13,768,000 Total Expenses 49,975,000 61,924,000 63,152,000 65,197,000 88,849,000 93,367,000 67,778,000 69,644,000 71,823,000 74,089,000 Revenues Less Expenses (7,549,000) (17,171,000) (14,488,000) (11,843,000) (298,000) 645,000 585,000 1,100,000 1,047,000 968,000 Ending Fund Balances 75,608,000 58,437,000 43,949,000 32,106,000 31,808,000 32,453,000 33,038,000 34,138,000 35,185,000 36,153,000 Min Rsrv Target:50%O&M&D+ $5MCIP 25,370,000 27,010,000 27,340,000 28,070,000 29,600,000 31,150,000 32,470,000 33,330,000 34,230,000 35,160,000 Debt Service Coverage (Min >1.25x) 1.21 1.09 1.51 1.92 2.00 2.08 2.13 2.19 2.22 2.24 Covg Excl Conn Fees (Min >1.00x) 0.83 0.70 1.10 1.50 1.64 1.76 1.83 1.88 1.90 1.91 Pay-Go Funding Generated for CIP 1,684,000 742,000 3,986,000 7,208,000 9,353,000 11,703,000 13,418,000 14,078,000 14,414,000 14,736,000 City of Fairfield Water Cash Flow Projections
2028 Water Bonds $60M tbd
Near-Term High-Priority CIP Completed by 2030

16 27.0 30.3 30.7 32.0 33.2 34.6 36.0 37.4 38.9 40.4 42.1

6.0 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.6 6.9 7.1 7.4 7.7 8.0 8.4

7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 9.4 10.9 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8

8.2 17.9 18.4 19.0 9.5 10.1

11.8 11.9 12.3 12.7 13.1

1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1

7.6 8.5 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1

50.0 62.9 64.2 66.2 66.3 70.9 67.8 69.6 71.8 74.1 76.4
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/25 Cash-Funded NBR CIP
Cash-Funded Water CIP
Debt Service
City Share of NBR WTP
Operations & Maintenance
Revenues
City of Fairfield Water Fund
10-Year Revenue & Expense Projections ($ Millions)
Assumes ~$50 million drawdown of Water Fund
reserves and $18 million drawdown of NBR Fund
reserves to help fund high-priority capital needs
over next 5 years.

Projected future rate increases phased in to
support long-term capital funding needs.

Assumes $60 million of debt
financing for Water System CIP
and NBR Improvements
Total
Expenses
Scenario A

17 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Historical & Projected Water Rate Increases
Projected Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
Historical Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
2021 Rates with

6.1% Escalation
4% 4% 4% 4% 0% 0%
12%
4 Years No Rate Increases
Last Increase Effective
January 1, 2021
0%

2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
12%
12%
10%
10%
0%
With implementation of proposed rates, the average
annual rate increase from 2014 - 2029 = 4.87%
Scenario A

18 Table 6A
City of Fairfield
Projected Water Rates
Scenario A
Current Updated
Meter Water Base Year Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Ratio Rates Rates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Rate Increase % 12% 12% 12% 10% 10%
Residential Units
Per Dwelling Unit 39,867 1.0 $0.97 $0.96 $1.08 $1.21 $1.36 $1.50 $1.65 Monthly Equiv (30 days) 29.10 28.80 32.40 36.30 40.80 45.00 49.50 Non-Residential
Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Meter Size Accounts
Up to 3/4" 1,247 1.5 $1.46 $1.44 $1.62 $1.82 $2.04 $2.25 $2.48 1" 574 2.5 2.55 2.40 2.70 3.03 3.40 3.75 4.13
1-1/2" 430 5.0 5.63 4.80 5.40 6.05 6.80 7.50 8.25
2" 334 8.0 9.91 7.68 8.64 9.68 10.88 12.00 13.20
3" 94 16.0 22.33 15.36 17.28 19.36 21.76 24.00 26.40
4" 36 25.0 39.59 24.00 27.00 30.25 34.00 37.50 41.25
6" 9 50.0 89.09 48.00 54.00 60.50 68.00 75.00 82.50
8" 0 80.0 158.76 76.80 86.40 96.80 108.80 120.00 132.00 Large Industrial 1 1,699.94 1,690.44 1,893.29 2,120.48 2,374.94 2,612.43 2,873.67 Large industrial accounts served by contract, charges may vary on a case-by-case basis.

Residential
Zones 1-2 $2.45 $2.59 $2.90 $3.25 $3.64 $4.00 $4.40
Zones 3-5 3.04 - 3.63 3.54 3.96 4.44 4.97 5.47 6.02
Non-Residential 2.59 - 3.05 2.59 2.90 3.25 3.64 4.00 4.40 Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.40 0.63 0.71 0.80 0.90 0.99 1.09 Large Industrial 1.84 1.84 2.06 2.31 2.59 2.85 3.14
* 1 hundred cubic feet (hcf) = approximately 748 gallons Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet)* Projected Water Rates
Projected Rates Effective

FIXED SERVICE CHARGES
Fixed service charges per day

VOLUME CHARGES

19 Table 7A Scenario A
City of Fairfield
Residential Bill Impacts
Monthly Current
Use Monthly Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
(hcf) Bill 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $/month % $/day
Overall Rate Increase 12% 12% 12% 10% 10% 70.0%
0 $29.50 $32.85 $36.80 $41.37 $45.63 $50.19 $20.68 70.1% $0.68 1 31.95 35.75 40.05 45.01 49.63 54.59 22.63 70.8% 0.74
2 34.40 38.65 43.30 48.65 53.63 58.99 24.58 71.5% 0.81
3 36.85 41.55 46.55 52.29 57.63 63.39 26.53 72.0% 0.87
4 39.30 44.45 49.80 55.93 61.63 67.79 28.48 72.5% 0.94
5 41.75 47.35 53.05 59.57 65.63 72.19 30.43 72.9% 1.00
6 44.20 50.25 56.30 63.21 69.63 76.59 32.38 73.3% 1.06
7 46.65 53.15 59.55 66.85 73.63 80.99 34.33 73.6% 1.13
8 49.10 56.05 62.80 70.49 77.63 85.39 36.28 73.9% 1.19
9 51.55 58.95 66.05 74.13 81.63 89.79 38.23 74.2% 1.26
10 54.00 61.85 69.30 77.77 85.63 94.19 40.18 74.4% 1.32 11 56.45 64.75 72.55 81.41 89.63 98.59 42.13 74.6% 1.39 12 58.90 67.65 75.80 85.05 93.63 102.99 44.08 74.8% 1.45 13 61.35 70.55 79.05 88.69 97.63 107.39 46.03 75.0% 1.51 14 63.80 73.45 82.30 92.33 101.63 111.79 47.98 75.2% 1.58 15 66.25 76.35 85.55 95.97 105.63 116.19 49.93 75.4% 1.64 16 68.70 79.25 88.80 99.61 109.63 120.59 51.88 75.5% 1.71 17 71.15 82.15 92.05 103.25 113.63 124.99 53.83 75.7% 1.77 18 73.60 85.05 95.30 106.89 117.63 129.39 55.78 75.8% 1.83 19 76.05 87.95 98.55 110.53 121.63 133.79 57.73 75.9% 1.90 20 78.50 90.85 101.80 114.17 125.63 138.19 59.68 76.0% 1.96 21 80.95 93.75 105.05 117.81 129.63 142.59 61.63 76.1% 2.03 22 83.40 96.65 108.30 121.45 133.63 146.99 63.58 76.2% 2.09 23 85.85 99.55 111.55 125.09 137.63 151.39 65.53 76.3% 2.15 24 88.30 102.45 114.80 128.73 141.63 155.79 67.48 76.4% 2.22 25 90.75 105.35 118.05 132.37 145.63 160.19 69.43 76.5% 2.28 Projected Monthly Bills 5-Year Impact
Median 50%
Average
Lowest 25%
2x Average

20 $53M (current $) NBR Conditions Improvement & Expansion in Years 4 & 5 Assumes $42 Million Drawdown of Water Fund Reserves Through 2029/30 Assumes $50 Million Debt Issuance in 2028/29 to help fund NBR Improvements & Water System CIP
Rate Increases Support Full Funding of Long-Term Average Annual Master Plan CIP After 8 Years
Scenario B
Rate Increases: 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Deferred Implementation of 2025 PUMP Water Master Plan Projects $94M (current $) of High-Priority Water System CIP Through Current + Next 7 Years and $18 Million Drawdown of NBR Maint/Repl Reserves
Reduced Rate Increases & Deferred PUMP Capital Funding

21 Table 5B Years 1 - 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cost Esc 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 Effective Date of Rate Increases tbd Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Overall Rate Adjustment % 0.0% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 3% Annual % Change in Water Sales 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Interest Earnings Rate 4.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Beginning Fund Balances $83,157,000 $75,608,000 $63,153,000 $52,854,000 $44,445,000 $42,352,000 $41,302,000 $36,672,000 $33,157,000 $33,826,000

REVENUES
Water Rate Revenues 34,800,000 37,725,000 41,498,000 45,647,000 50,212,000 55,233,000 59,448,000 62,420,000 65,541,000 68,213,000 Construction Mtr Rate Revenues 200,000 210,000 231,000 254,000 279,000 307,000 330,000 347,000 364,000 379,000 Investment Income 3,326,000 2,268,000 1,579,000 1,057,000 889,000 847,000 826,000 733,000 663,000 677,000 Connection Fees 3.0% 3,000,000 3,090,000 3,183,000 3,278,000 3,376,000 3,477,000 3,581,000 3,688,000 3,799,000 3,913,000 Other/Miscellaneous 3.0% 1,100,000 1,133,000 1,167,000 1,202,000 1,238,000 1,275,000 1,313,000 1,352,000 1,393,000 1,435,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Total Revenues 42,426,000 44,426,000 47,658,000 51,438,000 55,994,000 61,139,000 65,498,000 68,540,000 71,760,000 74,617,000 Projected Debt Proceeds 25,000,000 25,000,000

EXPENSES
Operating & Maintenance Budget Budget+ Budget+
Personnel 4.0% 11,689,000 11,374,000 11,884,000 12,359,000 12,853,000 13,367,000 13,902,000 14,458,000 15,036,000 15,637,000 Addl Staffing (Needed for CIP) 4.0% 0 300,000 600,000 624,000 649,000 675,000 702,000 730,000 759,000 789,000 Operating Materials/Supplies 4.0% 3,012,000 3,817,000 3,811,000 3,963,000 4,122,000 4,287,000 4,458,000 4,636,000 4,821,000 5,014,000 Repairs & Maintenance 4.0% 3,052,000 3,387,000 3,370,000 3,505,000 3,645,000 3,791,000 3,943,000 4,101,000 4,265,000 4,436,000 Utilities 4.0% 1,384,000 1,952,000 2,029,000 2,110,000 2,194,000 2,282,000 2,373,000 2,468,000 2,567,000 2,670,000 Internal Service Charges 4.0% 5,496,000 5,822,000 6,032,000 6,273,000 6,524,000 6,785,000 7,056,000 7,338,000 7,632,000 7,937,000 Capital Outlay & Vehicle Maint 4.0% 879,000 879,000 879,000 914,000 951,000 989,000 1,029,000 1,070,000 1,113,000 1,158,000 ContractuaI Svcs & Other Expenses 4.0% 2,195,000 3,641,000 3,041,000 3,163,000 3,290,000 3,422,000 3,559,000 3,701,000 3,849,000 4,003,000 Expense Credits for NBR Admin 4.0% (754,000) (916,000) (916,000) (953,000) (991,000) (1,031,000) (1,072,000) (1,115,000) (1,160,000) (1,206,000) Fairfield Share of NBR O&M (no CIP) 4.0% 5,950,000 5,916,000 6,109,000 6,353,000 6,607,000 6,871,000 7,146,000 7,432,000 7,729,000 8,038,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 32,903,000 36,172,000 36,839,000 38,311,000 39,844,000 41,438,000 43,096,000 44,819,000 46,611,000 48,476,000 Debt Service
2007 Water Certificates 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 2017 Water Revenue Bonds 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,355,000 1,356,000 1,355,000 1,359,000 1,357,000 1,355,000 1,355,000 Projected 2028 Bonds (5%, 30-Yr, 1.5Yrs Int Only) - - - - 1,267,000 2,533,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,835,000 9,103,000 10,368,000 11,184,000 11,182,000 11,180,000 11,180,000 Capital Improvements Long-Term Annual CIP Target
Water System Capital Projects 3.0% 8,000,000 12,607,000 12,985,000 13,375,000 13,776,000 14,190,000 14,615,000 15,054,000 12,300,000 12,669,000 Fairfield Share of NBR CIP 3.0% 1,000,000 1,030,000 1,061,000 1,093,000 27,631,000 28,460,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,030,000 Drawdown of City's NBR Repl Rsrvs tbd (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (7,500,000) (7,500,000) 0 0 0 0 Repayment of Loan from NBR Rsrvs 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 0 0 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 9,233,000 12,870,000 13,279,000 13,701,000 34,140,000 35,383,000 15,848,000 16,054,000 13,300,000 13,699,000 Total Expenses 49,975,000 56,881,000 57,957,000 59,847,000 83,087,000 87,189,000 70,128,000 72,055,000 71,091,000 73,355,000 Revenues Less Expenses (7,549,000) (12,455,000) (10,299,000) (8,409,000) (2,093,000) (1,050,000) (4,630,000) (3,515,000) 669,000 1,262,000 Ending Fund Balances 75,608,000 63,153,000 52,854,000 44,445,000 42,352,000 41,302,000 36,672,000 33,157,000 33,826,000 35,088,000 Min Rsrv Target:50%O&M&D+ $5MCIP 25,370,000 27,010,000 27,340,000 28,070,000 29,470,000 30,900,000 32,140,000 33,000,000 33,900,000 34,830,000 Debt Service Coverage (Min >1.25x) 1.21 1.05 1.38 1.68 1.77 1.90 2.00 2.12 2.25 2.34 Covg Excl Conn Fees (Min >1.00x) 0.83 0.66 0.97 1.26 1.40 1.56 1.68 1.79 1.91 1.99 Pay-Go Funding Generated for CIP 1,684,000 415,000 2,980,000 5,292,000 7,047,000 9,333,000 11,218,000 12,539,000 13,969,000 14,961,000 City of Fairfield Water Cash Flow Projections
2028 Water Bonds $50M tbd
Near-Term High-Priority CIP Spread Over Years 1 - 8

22 27.0 30.3 30.7 32.0 33.2 34.6 36.0 37.4 38.9 40.4 42.1

6.0 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.6 6.9 7.1 7.4 7.7 8.0 8.4

7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2

8.2 12.8 13.2 13.6 4.0 4.4

14.8 15.1 12.3 12.7 13.0

1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1

7.6 8.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1

50.0 57.9 59.0 60.8 60.6 64.7

70.1 72.1 71.1 73.4 75.7
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/25 Cash-Funded NBR CIP
Cash-Funded Water CIP
Debt Service
City Share of NBR WTP
Operations & Maintenance
Revenues
City of Fairfield Water Fund
10-Year Revenue & Expense Projections ($ Millions)
Assumes ~$48 million drawdown of Water Fund
reserves and $18 million drawdown of NBR Fund
reserves to help fund high-priority capital needs
over next 7 years.

Projected future rate increases phased in to
support long-term capital funding needs.

Assumes $50 million of debt
financing for Water System CIP
and NBR Improvements
Total
Expenses
Scenario B

23 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Historical & Projected Water Rate Increases
Projected Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
Historical Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
2021 Rates with

5.44% Escalation
4% 4% 4% 4% 0% 0%
10%
4 Years No Rate Increases
Last Increase Effective
January 1, 2021
0%

2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
0%
With implementation of proposed rates, the average
annual rate increase from 2014 - 2029 = 4.52%
Scenario B

24 Table 6B
City of Fairfield
Projected Water Rates
Scenario B
Current Updated
Meter Water Base Year Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Ratio Rates Rates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Rate Increase % 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Residential Units
Per Dwelling Unit 39,867 1.0 $0.97 $0.96 $1.06 $1.17 $1.29 $1.42 $1.56 Monthly Equiv (30 days) 29.10 28.80 31.80 35.10 38.70 42.60 46.80 Non-Residential
Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Meter Size Accounts
Up to 3/4" 1,247 1.5 $1.46 $1.44 $1.59 $1.76 $1.94 $2.13 $2.34 1" 574 2.5 2.55 2.40 2.65 2.93 3.23 3.55 3.90
1-1/2" 430 5.0 5.63 4.80 5.30 5.85 6.45 7.10 7.80
2" 334 8.0 9.91 7.68 8.48 9.36 10.32 11.36 12.48
3" 94 16.0 22.33 15.36 16.96 18.72 20.64 22.72 24.96
4" 36 25.0 39.59 24.00 26.50 29.25 32.25 35.50 39.00
6" 9 50.0 89.09 48.00 53.00 58.50 64.50 71.00 78.00
8" 0 80.0 158.76 76.80 84.80 93.60 103.20 113.60 124.80 Large Industrial 1 1,699.94 1,690.44 1,859.48 2,045.43 2,249.97 2,474.97 2,722.47 Large industrial accounts served by contract, charges may vary on a case-by-case basis.

Residential
Zones 1-2 $2.45 $2.59 $2.84 $3.12 $3.43 $3.77 $4.15
Zones 3-5 3.04 - 3.63 3.54 3.89 4.28 4.71 5.18 5.70
Non-Residential 2.59 - 3.05 2.59 2.84 3.12 3.43 3.77 4.15 Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.40 0.63 0.70 0.77 0.85 0.94 1.03 Large Industrial 1.84 1.84 2.02 2.22 2.44 2.68 2.95
* 1 hundred cubic feet (hcf) = approximately 748 gallons Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet)* Projected Water Rates
Projected Rates Effective

FIXED SERVICE CHARGES
Fixed service charges per day

VOLUME CHARGES

25 Table 7B Scenario B
City of Fairfield
Residential Bill Impacts
Monthly Current
Use Monthly Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
(hcf) Bill 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $/month % $/day
Overall Rate Increase 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 61.1%
0 $29.50 $32.24 $35.59 $39.24 $43.19 $47.45 $17.95 60.8% $0.59 1 31.95 35.08 38.71 42.67 46.96 51.60 19.65 61.5% 0.65
2 34.40 37.92 41.83 46.10 50.73 55.75 21.35 62.0% 0.70
3 36.85 40.76 44.95 49.53 54.50 59.90 23.05 62.5% 0.76
4 39.30 43.60 48.07 52.96 58.27 64.05 24.75 63.0% 0.81
5 41.75 46.44 51.19 56.39 62.04 68.20 26.45 63.3% 0.87
6 44.20 49.28 54.31 59.82 65.81 72.35 28.15 63.7% 0.93
7 46.65 52.12 57.43 63.25 69.58 76.50 29.85 64.0% 0.98
8 49.10 54.96 60.55 66.68 73.35 80.65 31.55 64.2% 1.04
9 51.55 57.80 63.67 70.11 77.12 84.80 33.25 64.5% 1.09
10 54.00 60.64 66.79 73.54 80.89 88.95 34.95 64.7% 1.15 11 56.45 63.48 69.91 76.97 84.66 93.10 36.65 64.9% 1.20 12 58.90 66.32 73.03 80.40 88.43 97.25 38.35 65.1% 1.26 13 61.35 69.16 76.15 83.83 92.20 101.40 40.05 65.3% 1.32 14 63.80 72.00 79.27 87.26 95.97 105.55 41.75 65.4% 1.37 15 66.25 74.84 82.39 90.69 99.74 109.70 43.45 65.6% 1.43 16 68.70 77.68 85.51 94.12 103.51 113.85 45.15 65.7% 1.48 17 71.15 80.52 88.63 97.55 107.28 118.00 46.85 65.8% 1.54 18 73.60 83.36 91.75 100.98 111.05 122.15 48.55 66.0% 1.60 19 76.05 86.20 94.87 104.41 114.82 126.30 50.25 66.1% 1.65 20 78.50 89.04 97.99 107.84 118.59 130.45 51.95 66.2% 1.71 21 80.95 91.88 101.11 111.27 122.36 134.60 53.65 66.3% 1.76 22 83.40 94.72 104.23 114.70 126.13 138.75 55.35 66.4% 1.82 23 85.85 97.56 107.35 118.13 129.90 142.90 57.05 66.4% 1.88 24 88.30 100.40 110.47 121.56 133.67 147.05 58.75 66.5% 1.93 25 90.75 103.24 113.59 124.99 137.44 151.20 60.45 66.6% 1.99 Projected Monthly Bills 5-Year Impact
Median 50%
Average
Lowest 25%
2x Average

26 Assumes $40 Million Drawdown of Water Fund Reserves Through 2029/30 $53M (current $) NBR Conditions Improvement & Expansion in Years 4 & 5 and $18 Million Drawdown of NBR Maint/Repl Reserves
Assumes $50 Million Debt Issuance in 2028/29 to help fund NBR Improvements & Water System CIP
Rate Increases Support Full Funding of Long-Term Average Annual Master Plan CIP After 10 Years
Scenario C
Rate Increases: 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Further Implementation of 2025 PUMP Water Master Plan Projects $94M (current $) of High-Priority Water System CIP Through Current + Next 9 Years Minimum Recommended Rate Increases

27 Table 5C Years 1 - 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cost Esc 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 Effective Date of Rate Increases tbd Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Overall Rate Adjustment % 0.0% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 5% 5% Annual % Change in Water Sales 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Interest Earnings Rate 4.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Beginning Fund Balances $83,157,000 $75,608,000 $65,133,000 $56,147,000 $48,217,000 $45,604,000 $42,841,000 $37,687,000 $35,189,000 $34,607,000

REVENUES
Water Rate Revenues 34,800,000 37,400,000 40,392,000 43,623,000 47,113,000 50,882,000 54,953,000 59,349,000 63,262,000 66,425,000 Construction Mtr Rate Revenues 200,000 208,000 225,000 243,000 262,000 283,000 306,000 330,000 351,000 369,000 Investment Income 3,326,000 2,268,000 1,628,000 1,123,000 964,000 912,000 857,000 754,000 704,000 692,000 Connection Fees 3.0% 3,000,000 3,090,000 3,183,000 3,278,000 3,376,000 3,477,000 3,581,000 3,688,000 3,799,000 3,913,000 Other/Miscellaneous 3.0% 1,100,000 1,133,000 1,167,000 1,202,000 1,238,000 1,275,000 1,313,000 1,352,000 1,393,000 1,435,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Total Revenues 42,426,000 44,099,000 46,595,000 49,469,000 52,953,000 56,829,000 61,010,000 65,473,000 69,509,000 72,834,000 Projected Debt Proceeds 25,000,000 25,000,000

EXPENSES
Operating & Maintenance Budget Budget+ Budget+
Personnel 4.0% 11,689,000 11,374,000 11,884,000 12,359,000 12,853,000 13,367,000 13,902,000 14,458,000 15,036,000 15,637,000 Addl Staffing (Needed for CIP) 4.0% 0 300,000 600,000 624,000 649,000 675,000 702,000 730,000 759,000 789,000 Operating Materials/Supplies 4.0% 3,012,000 3,817,000 3,811,000 3,963,000 4,122,000 4,287,000 4,458,000 4,636,000 4,821,000 5,014,000 Repairs & Maintenance 4.0% 3,052,000 3,387,000 3,370,000 3,505,000 3,645,000 3,791,000 3,943,000 4,101,000 4,265,000 4,436,000 Utilities 4.0% 1,384,000 1,952,000 2,029,000 2,110,000 2,194,000 2,282,000 2,373,000 2,468,000 2,567,000 2,670,000 Internal Service Charges 4.0% 5,496,000 5,822,000 6,032,000 6,273,000 6,524,000 6,785,000 7,056,000 7,338,000 7,632,000 7,937,000 Capital Outlay & Vehicle Maint 4.0% 879,000 879,000 879,000 914,000 951,000 989,000 1,029,000 1,070,000 1,113,000 1,158,000 ContractuaI Svcs & Other Expenses 4.0% 2,195,000 3,641,000 3,041,000 3,163,000 3,290,000 3,422,000 3,559,000 3,701,000 3,849,000 4,003,000 Expense Credits for NBR Admin 4.0% (754,000) (916,000) (916,000) (953,000) (991,000) (1,031,000) (1,072,000) (1,115,000) (1,160,000) (1,206,000) Fairfield Share of NBR O&M (no CIP) 4.0% 5,950,000 5,916,000 6,109,000 6,353,000 6,607,000 6,871,000 7,146,000 7,432,000 7,729,000 8,038,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 32,903,000 36,172,000 36,839,000 38,311,000 39,844,000 41,438,000 43,096,000 44,819,000 46,611,000 48,476,000 Debt Service
2007 Water Certificates 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 6,480,000 2017 Water Revenue Bonds 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,359,000 1,355,000 1,356,000 1,355,000 1,359,000 1,357,000 1,355,000 1,355,000 Projected 2028 Bonds (5%, 30-Yr, 1.5Yrs Int Only) - - - - 1,267,000 2,533,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 3,345,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,839,000 7,835,000 9,103,000 10,368,000 11,184,000 11,182,000 11,180,000 11,180,000 Capital Improvements
Water System Capital Projects 3.0% 8,000,000 10,300,000 10,609,000 10,927,000 11,255,000 11,593,000 10,651,000 10,970,000 11,300,000 11,639,000 Fairfield Share of NBR CIP 3.0% 1,000,000 1,030,000 1,061,000 1,093,000 27,631,000 28,460,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Drawdown of City's NBR Repl Rsrvs tbd (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (7,500,000) (7,500,000) 0 0 0 0 Repayment of Loan from NBR Rsrvs 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 0 0 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ Subtotal 9,233,000 10,563,000 10,903,000 11,253,000 31,619,000 32,786,000 11,884,000 11,970,000 12,300,000 12,639,000 Total Expenses 49,975,000 54,574,000 55,581,000 57,399,000 80,566,000 84,592,000 66,164,000 67,971,000 70,091,000 72,295,000 Revenues Less Expenses (7,549,000) (10,475,000) (8,986,000) (7,930,000) (2,613,000) (2,763,000) (5,154,000) (2,498,000) (582,000) 539,000 Ending Fund Balances 75,608,000 65,133,000 56,147,000 48,217,000 45,604,000 42,841,000 37,687,000 35,189,000 34,607,000 35,146,000 Min Rsrv Target:50%O&M&D+ $5MCIP 25,370,000 27,010,000 27,340,000 28,070,000 29,470,000 30,900,000 32,140,000 33,000,000 33,900,000 34,830,000 Debt Service Coverage (Min >1.25x) 1.21 1.01 1.24 1.42 1.44 1.48 1.60 1.85 2.05 2.18 Covg Excl Conn Fees (Min >1.00x) 0.83 0.62 0.84 1.01 1.07 1.15 1.28 1.52 1.71 1.83 Pay-Go Funding Generated for CIP 1,684,000 88,000 1,917,000 3,323,000 4,006,000 5,023,000 6,730,000 9,472,000 11,718,000 13,178,000 City of Fairfield Water Cash Flow Projections
2028 Water Bonds $50M tbd
Near-Term High-Priority CIP Costs Spread Over Years 1 - 10

28 27.0 30.3 30.7 32.0 33.2 34.6 36.0 37.4 38.9 40.4 42.1

6.0 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.6 6.9 7.1 7.4 7.7 8.0 8.4

7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2

8.2 10.5 10.8 11.2 1.5 1.8

10.9 11.0 11.3 11.6

13.1 1.0

1.0 1.1 1.1

7.6 8.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.1 50.0

55.6 56.6 58.4 58.1 62.1

66.2 68.0 70.1 72.3

75.7 $0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/25 Cash-Funded NBR CIP
Cash-Funded Water CIP
Debt Service
City Share of NBR WTP
Operations & Maintenance
Revenues
City of Fairfield Water Fund
10-Year Revenue & Expense Projections ($ Millions)
Assumes ~$46 million drawdown of Water Fund
reserves and $18 million drawdown of NBR Fund
reserves to help fund high-priority capital needs
over next 7 years.

Projected future rate increases phased in to
support long-term capital funding needs.

Assumes $50 million of debt
financing for Water System CIP
and NBR Improvements
Total
Expenses
Scenario C

29 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Historical & Projected Water Rate Increases
Projected Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
Historical Rate Increases
(Effective January 1)
2021 Rates with

4.37% Escalation
4% 4% 4% 4% 0% 0%
8%
4 Years No Rate Increases
Last Increase Effective
January 1, 2021
0%

2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
8%
8%
8%
8%
0%
With implementation of proposed rates, the average
annual rate increase from 2014 - 2029 = 3.92%
Scenario C

30 Table 6C
City of Fairfield
Projected Water Rates
Scenario C
Current Updated
Meter Water Base Year Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Ratio Rates Rates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Rate Increase % 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Residential Units
Per Dwelling Unit 39,867 1.0 $0.97 $0.96 $1.04 $1.12 $1.21 $1.31 $1.41 Monthly Equiv (30 days) 29.10 28.80 31.20 33.60 36.30 39.30 42.30 Non-Residential
Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Meter Size Accounts
Up to 3/4" 1,247 1.5 $1.46 $1.44 $1.56 $1.68 $1.82 $1.97 $2.12 1" 574 2.5 2.55 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.03 3.28 3.53
1-1/2" 430 5.0 5.63 4.80 5.20 5.60 6.05 6.55 7.05
2" 334 8.0 9.91 7.68 8.32 8.96 9.68 10.48 11.28
3" 94 16.0 22.33 15.36 16.64 17.92 19.36 20.96 22.56
4" 36 25.0 39.59 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.25 32.75 35.25
6" 9 50.0 89.09 48.00 52.00 56.00 60.50 65.50 70.50
8" 0 80.0 158.76 76.80 83.20 89.60 96.80 104.80 112.80
Large Industrial 1 1,699.94 1,690.44 1,825.68 1,971.73 2,129.47 2,299.83 2,483.82 Large industrial accounts served by contract, charges may vary on a case-by-case basis.

Residential
Zones 1-2 $2.45 $2.59 $2.79 $3.01 $3.25 $3.51 $3.79
Zones 3-5 3.04 - 3.63 3.54 3.82 4.13 4.46 4.82 5.21
Non-Residential 2.59 - 3.05 2.59 2.79 3.01 3.25 3.51 3.79 Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.40 0.63 0.68 0.73 0.79 0.85 0.92 Large Industrial 1.84 1.84 1.99 2.15 2.32 2.51 2.71
* 1 hundred cubic feet (hcf) = approximately 748 gallons Projected Water Rates
Projected Rates Effective
Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet)*

FIXED SERVICE CHARGES
Fixed service charges per day

VOLUME CHARGES

31 Table 7C Scenario C
City of Fairfield
Residential Bill Impacts
Monthly Current
Use Monthly Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
(hcf) Bill 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $/month % $/day
Overall Rate Increase 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 46.9%
0 $29.50 $31.63 $34.07 $36.80 $39.85 $42.89 $13.38 45.4% $0.44 1 31.95 34.42 37.08 40.05 43.36 46.68 14.72 46.1% 0.48
2 34.40 37.21 40.09 43.30 46.87 50.47 16.06 46.7% 0.53
3 36.85 40.00 43.10 46.55 50.38 54.26 17.40 47.2% 0.57
4 39.30 42.79 46.11 49.80 53.89 58.05 18.74 47.7% 0.62
5 41.75 45.58 49.12 53.05 57.40 61.84 20.08 48.1% 0.66
6 44.20 48.37 52.13 56.30 60.91 65.63 21.42 48.5% 0.70
7 46.65 51.16 55.14 59.55 64.42 69.42 22.76 48.8% 0.75
8 49.10 53.95 58.15 62.80 67.93 73.21 24.10 49.1% 0.79
9 51.55 56.74 61.16 66.05 71.44 77.00 25.44 49.4% 0.84
10 54.00 59.53 64.17 69.30 74.95 80.79 26.78 49.6% 0.88 11 56.45 62.32 67.18 72.55 78.46 84.58 28.12 49.8% 0.92 12 58.90 65.11 70.19 75.80 81.97 88.37 29.46 50.0% 0.97 13 61.35 67.90 73.20 79.05 85.48 92.16 30.80 50.2% 1.01 14 63.80 70.69 76.21 82.30 88.99 95.95 32.14 50.4% 1.06 15 66.25 73.48 79.22 85.55 92.50 99.74 33.48 50.5% 1.10 16 68.70 76.27 82.23 88.80 96.01 103.53 34.82 50.7% 1.14 17 71.15 79.06 85.24 92.05 99.52 107.32 36.16 50.8% 1.19 18 73.60 81.85 88.25 95.30 103.03 111.11 37.50 51.0% 1.23 19 76.05 84.64 91.26 98.55 106.54 114.90 38.84 51.1% 1.28 20 78.50 87.43 94.27 101.80 110.05 118.69 40.18 51.2% 1.32 21 80.95 90.22 97.28 105.05 113.56 122.48 41.52 51.3% 1.37 22 83.40 93.01 100.29 108.30 117.07 126.27 42.86 51.4% 1.41 23 85.85 95.80 103.30 111.55 120.58 130.06 44.20 51.5% 1.45 24 88.30 98.59 106.31 114.80 124.09 133.85 45.54 51.6% 1.50 25 90.75 101.38 109.32 118.05 127.60 137.64 46.88 51.7% 1.54 Projected Monthly Bills 5-Year Impact
Median 50%
Average
Lowest 25%
2x Average

32 Water Use & Analysis

33 Table 8
City of Fairfield
Water Use (hcf)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Residential
Single Family Res 3,796,463 3,675,193 4,071,945 4,361,066 3,968,593 3,753,579 3,547,408 Multi Family Res 639,977 600,331 604,956 635,185 602,720 576,965 550,181 Mobile Home Park 65,647 56,894 49,835 56,896 59,561 71,426 65,622 Res Volume Charge - - 14,780 10,055 9,713 8,693 9,511
Subtotal 4,502,087 4,332,418 4,741,516 5,063,202 4,640,587 4,410,663 4,172,722 Commercial
General Commercial 239,823 256,498 232,611 226,620 253,558 245,974 221,904 Gas Stations 24,817 27,066 28,950 32,283 26,759 23,004 19,073 Hospitals 43,036 44,971 49,135 52,682 51,390 46,550 44,660 Hotel/Motel 55,437 66,714 62,124 67,149 67,218 67,406 65,933 Churches 15,745 14,663 14,424 11,474 12,148 13,082 10,414 City Offices 14,019 14,821 16,297 15,265 8,611 7,087 4,651 Public Offices 45,900 38,863 38,072 36,509 37,290 36,232 35,004 Restaurant/Bar 83,216 78,587 75,621 62,377 66,687 63,590 57,983 Retail 61,698 56,536 61,476 55,473 53,435 48,407 49,778 Schools 56,168 43,253 40,361 36,404 41,914 41,883 45,003 Misc commercial 2,972 2,165 6,737 4,140 4,175 1,087 1,277 Other commercial 103,385 101,524 109,220 128,948 123,964 118,088 102,904 Subtotal 746,216 745,661 735,028 729,324 747,149 712,390 658,584 Industrial
Industrial 91,324 113,505 109,323 120,986 120,479 123,390 118,332 Large Industrial 8,537 4,878 4,473 972 965 1,093 1,341
Light Industrial 193,712 202,675 251,048 242,348 232,005 262,890 249,475 Anheuser Busch 420,995 419,196 412,396 416,293 405,544 372,556 330,175 Subtotal 714,568 740,254 777,240 780,599 758,993 759,929 699,323 Irrigation
Irrigation 47,525 51,772 93,392 131,699 139,472 152,555 143,138 Landscape Irrigation 1,314,329 1,205,317 1,438,243 1,506,550 1,317,123 1,156,971 1,096,397 Spl Landscape Irr 262,914 267,142 291,048 321,906 239,989 224,912 304,408 Unbilled (est) 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 Subtotal 1,804,768 1,704,231 2,002,683 2,140,155 1,876,584 1,714,438 1,723,943 Other
Construction/Hydrant 427,003 321,927 127,092 34,945 40,851 32,636 14,792 Construction/Temp 1,143 2,523 3,132 4,888 5,169 8,255 11,252 Res Constr/No Meter 11,692 11,988 67 160 181 175 189
Fire Meters 4,890 4,368 15,594 9,188 8,749 8,638 8,816
(blank) 410 311 317 86 - - -
Subtotal 445,138 341,117 146,202 49,267 54,950 49,704 35,049 Total 8,212,777 7,863,681 8,402,669 8,762,547 8,078,263 7,647,124 7,289,621

34 4,502,087 4,332,418 4,741,516 5,063,202 4,640,587 4,410,663 4,172,722 746,216 745,661
735,028
729,324
747,149 712,390
658,584
714,568 740,254
777,240
780,599
758,993
759,929
699,323
1,804,768 1,704,231
2,002,683
2,140,155
1,876,584
1,714,438
1,723,943
445,138
341,117
146,202
49,267
54,950
49,704
35,049
8,212,777
7,863,681
8,402,669
8,762,547
8,078,263
7,647,124
7,289,621
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Residential Commercial Industrial Irrigation Other
City of Fairfield
Historical Water Sales (hcf)

35 Table 9
City of Fairfield
Projected Annual Water Use (hcf)
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Projected 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Use
Estimated
Residential
Zones 1-2 4,545,748 4,322,407 4,095,208 4,153,892 4,200,000 Zones 3-5 94,097 88,867 78,990 77,580 80,000 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Subtotal 4,639,845 4,411,274 4,174,198 4,231,472 4,280,000 Non-Residential
Comm'l/Institutional/Light Industrial 1,108,984 1,109,697 1,034,026 1,045,632 1,050,000 Irrigation 1,346,115 1,221,308 1,163,004 1,195,914 1,190,000 Est. Additional Irrigation 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Subtotal 2,635,099 2,511,005 2,377,030 2,421,546 2,420,000 Large Industrial (Anheuser Busch) 405,544 372,556 330,175 350,953 360,000 Construction/Other 52,848 45,537 34,002 26,923 20,000
Total 7,733,336 7,340,372 6,915,405 7,030,894 7,080,000

36 Table 10
City of Fairfield Median Monthly Use: 7.0 hcf
Single Family Residential Consumption Block Analysis Average Monthly Use: 10.3 hcf Monthly
Use (hcf) In Block % of Total Cumulative Cumulative % In Block % of Ttl Use (hcf) % of Ttl 0 12,000 3.5% 12,000 3.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
1 11,533 3.4% 23,533 6.9% 11,533 0.3% 330,401 9.3%
2 18,915 5.5% 42,448 12.4% 37,830 1.1% 649,269 18.3%
3 25,123 7.3% 67,571 19.7% 75,369 2.1% 949,222 26.8%
4 Low Use 28,576 8.3% 96,147 28.1% 114,304 3.2% 1,224,052 34.6% 5 29,221 8.5% 125,368 36.6% 146,105 4.1% 1,470,306 41.5% 6 27,176 7.9% 152,544 44.6% 163,056 4.6% 1,687,339 47.7% 7 Median 24,171 7.1% 176,715 51.6% 169,197 4.8% 1,877,196 53.0% 8 20,824 6.1% 197,539 57.7% 166,592 4.7% 2,042,882 57.7% 9 17,548 5.1% 215,087 62.8% 157,932 4.5% 2,187,744 61.8% 10 Average 15,084 4.4% 230,171 67.2% 150,840 4.3% 2,315,058 65.4% 11 13,022 3.8% 243,193 71.0% 143,242 4.0% 2,427,288 68.6% 12 11,104 3.2% 254,297 74.3% 133,248 3.8% 2,526,496 71.4% 13 9,408 2.7% 263,705 77.0% 122,304 3.5% 2,614,600 73.8% 14 8,377 2.4% 272,082 79.5% 117,278 3.3% 2,693,296 76.1% 15 7,221 2.1% 279,303 81.6% 108,315 3.1% 2,763,615 78.1% 16 6,297 1.8% 285,600 83.4% 100,752 2.8% 2,826,713 79.8% 17 5,479 1.6% 291,079 85.0% 93,143 2.6% 2,883,514 81.4% 18 5,026 1.5% 296,105 86.5% 90,468 2.6% 2,934,836 82.9% 19 4,410 1.3% 300,515 87.8% 83,790 2.4% 2,981,132 84.2% 20 3,894 1.1% 304,409 88.9% 77,880 2.2% 3,023,018 85.4% 21 Top 10% 3,522 1.0% 307,931 89.9% 73,962 2.1% 3,061,010 86.5% 22 3,157 0.9% 311,088 90.9% 69,454 2.0% 3,095,480 87.4% 23 2,828 0.8% 313,916 91.7% 65,044 1.8% 3,126,793 88.3% 24 2,499 0.7% 316,415 92.4% 59,976 1.7% 3,155,278 89.1% 25 2,313 0.7% 318,728 93.1% 57,825 1.6% 3,181,264 89.9% 26 1,972 0.6% 320,700 93.7% 51,272 1.4% 3,204,937 90.5% 27 1,798 0.5% 322,498 94.2% 48,546 1.4% 3,226,638 91.1% 28 1,705 0.5% 324,203 94.7% 47,740 1.3% 3,246,541 91.7% 29 Top 5% 1,487 0.4% 325,690 95.1% 43,123 1.2% 3,264,739 92.2% 30 1,330 0.4% 327,020 95.5% 39,900 1.1% 3,281,450 92.7% 31 1,207 0.4% 328,227 95.9% 37,417 1.1% 3,296,831 93.1% 32 1,144 0.3% 329,371 96.2% 36,608 1.0% 3,311,005 93.5% 33 953 0.3% 330,324 96.5% 31,449 0.9% 3,324,035 93.9%
34 930 0.3% 331,254 96.7% 31,620 0.9% 3,336,112 94.2%
35 822 0.2% 332,076 97.0% 28,770 0.8% 3,347,259 94.5%
36 754 0.2% 332,830 97.2% 27,144 0.8% 3,357,584 94.8%
37 713 0.2% 333,543 97.4% 26,381 0.7% 3,367,155 95.1%
38 618 0.2% 334,161 97.6% 23,484 0.7% 3,376,013 95.4%
39 562 0.2% 334,723 97.8% 21,918 0.6% 3,384,253 95.6%
40 486 0.1% 335,209 97.9% 19,440 0.5% 3,391,931 95.8%
41 489 0.1% 335,698 98.0% 20,049 0.6% 3,399,123 96.0%
42 443 0.1% 336,141 98.2% 18,606 0.5% 3,405,826 96.2%
43 393 0.1% 336,534 98.3% 16,899 0.5% 3,412,086 96.4%
44 344 0.1% 336,878 98.4% 15,136 0.4% 3,417,953 96.5%
45 330 0.1% 337,208 98.5% 14,850 0.4% 3,423,476 96.7%
46 303 0.1% 337,511 98.6% 13,938 0.4% 3,428,669 96.8%
47 285 0.1% 337,796 98.7% 13,395 0.4% 3,433,559 97.0%
48 277 0.1% 338,073 98.7% 13,296 0.4% 3,438,164 97.1%
49 243 0.1% 338,316 98.8% 11,907 0.3% 3,442,492 97.2%
50 237 0.1% 338,553 98.9% 11,850 0.3% 3,446,577 97.3%
51-100 3,367 1.0% 341,920 99.9% 217,549 6.1% 3,507,801 99.1% 101-200 439 0.1% 342,359 100.0% 56,054 1.6% 3,531,980 99.8% >200 _______ 42 _______ 0.0% 342,401 100.0% _______ 12,721 _______ 0.4% 3,540,501 100.0% Total 342,401 100.0% 3,540,501 100.0%
Number of Bills Water Use (hcf) Use Through Break

37 0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
0 est
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 % of Bills at Each Usage Level . Monthly Water Use (hcf) City of Fairfield
Distribution of Single Family Residential Monthly Bills 2023/24 Percentage of bills at each level of water use
~4.5% of bills
> 30 hcf
Median Monthly Bill: 7.0 hcf
Average Monthly Bill: 10.4 hcf

38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Fairfield will hold a Public Hearing on November 4, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, located at 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 to consider the adoption of proposed water rate increases. The City last adjusted water rates on January 1, 2021 and has not adopted any rate increases for over 4-1/2 years despite substantial increases in operating expenses over this period. The City is proposing to gradually increase its water rates over the next five years to provide adequate funding for operations, debt service and high-priority capital improvements needed to support safe and reliable service.

All interested persons are invited to attend the Public Hearing. The Fairfield City Council will hear and consider all written and oral comments regarding the proposed water rates at the Public Hearing. In the absence of a majority protest (described below), the City Council may adopt water rates up to the levels set forth in this Notice. If adopted, the proposed water rates would become effective starting January 1, 2026.

Llame al (707) 428-7465 para solicitar esta información en español https://www.fairfield.ca.gov/government/pump
History of Investment in Water System
The City has a long history of investing in its water system to ensure uninterrupted service and high-quality water for our community. The City has worked hard to secure a reliable supply of water and put into place the infrastructure and treatment capacity to serve our residents and businesses. The City’s water system includes over 375 miles of water transmission and distribution pipelines, 12 water storage tanks, 14 pump stations, and two water treatment plants including the North Bay Regional Treatment Plant, which is jointly owned by the Cities of Fairfield and Vacaville.

Sources of supply include untreated water purchased from Solano County Water Agency and the Solano Irrigation District. Like many regional agencies, the City has a lot of aging water infrastructure that will require rehabilitation and replacement in upcoming years.

Why Water Rate Increases are Necessary
Fairfield’s water service charges for a typical single family home are currently among the lowest in the region. Since water rates were last adjusted in 2021, the City has faced significant water system operating cost increases without any corresponding rate adjustments. Additionally, the City recently completed an independent engineering evaluation of the water system that identifies substantial funding needs of the City’s aging water system infrastructure. The proposed rate increases are needed to:
 Catch Up & Keep Up with Operating Cost Inflation – The City has experienced substantial increases in operating expenses over the past 4-1/2 years. Costs have increased for staffing, electricity, insurance, professional services and other expenses. The proposed rates are designed to both catch up with cost inflation from recent years and address escalating costs of service which are expected to rise by 3-4% per year.  Fund Capital Improvement Needs of Aging Facilities – Many of the City’s water pipelines have been in service from 50 to over 80 years and are approaching the end of their useful lives. Other infrastructure, including water storage tanks and treatment plants, are old and in need of substantial improvements to address existing deficiencies and support safe and reliable service. A recently-completed Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP) was developed by West Yost, an independent engineering firm that specializes in water resources and infrastructure.

The PUMP master plan identifies $340 million of capital improvements needed over the next 25 years including over $140 million of high-priority needs recommended for completion over the next 5-6 years. Near-term funding needs include almost $80 million of water system storage and distribution improvements, $15 million of Waterman Treatment Plant improvements, and $53 million for Fairfield’s share of capital needs for upgrading and expanding the aging North Bay Regional Water Treatment Plant. Information about the City’s PUMP water master plan is available on the City’s website at ___________________________.  Support Compliance with Debt Service Legal Covenants – Rate increases are also needed to support compliance with legal covenants that secure the water utility’s outstanding debt.

City of Fairfield
Notice of Public Hearing
For Proposed Water Rate Increases
DRAFT

Proposed Water Rates
The City is proposing to phase in water rate increases over the next five years and adopt a new water rate schedule as shown below. The proposed rates account for both overall annual rate increases as well as a number of modifications to the City’s water rate structure designed to align rates with the cost of providing service and ensure rates are equitably applied to all customers. The proposed rates reflect approximately 8% annual increases, however the impacts in the first year will vary based on customer class and water use due to the proposed modifications to the rate structure. The City bills monthly for water service. Proposed water rates include the following components:
 Fixed Service Charges: These charges are billed per day and help recover the City’s fixed costs of providing water service. Residential customers pay fixed service charges per dwelling unit. Non-Residential customers pay fixed charges based on the size of each customer’s water meter. Large Industrial accounts pay fixed charges determined on a case-by-case basis according to each customer’s contract and/or water demand.  Volume Charges: These charges are billed based on each customer’s metered water consumption. Residential Volume Charges vary based on elevation zone. Most residential customers are in Zones 1-2. As proposed, NonResidential customers would pay a uniform rate for all water use consistent with the Residential rate for Zones 1-2. The City’s Volume Charges are billed in units of one hundred cubic feet (hcf). One hcf equals approximately 748 gallons. For example, the proposed rate of $2.79 per hcf effective January 1, 2026 (for Residential Zones 1- 2 and Non-Residential accounts) equates to $0.37 per hundred gallons, or a little less than 4/10ths of a cent per gallon.
 Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge: This charge recovers costs for pumping to a pressurized zone that serves a small number of Non-Residential customers and is billed based on metered water use.

Note: Propose rates for customers outside Fairfield’s boundaries in the Willotta Oaks Subdivision shall not exceed the costs of service based on charges levied by the City of Vallejo for providing water service to these customers. See Current
Water Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Rates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

RESIDENTIAL
Per Dwelling Unit $0.97 $1.04 $1.12 $1.21 $1.31 $1.41

NON-RESIDENTIAL
Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Meter Size
Up to 3/4" $1.46 $1.56 $1.68 $1.82 $1.97 $2.12
1" 2.55 2.60 2.80 3.03 3.28 3.53
1-1/2" 5.63 5.20 5.60 6.05 6.55 7.05
2" 9.91 8.32 8.96 9.68 10.48 11.28
3" 22.33 16.64 17.92 19.36 20.96 22.56
4" 39.59 26.00 28.00 30.25 32.75 35.25
6" 89.09 52.00 56.00 60.50 65.50 70.50
8" 158.76 83.20 89.60 96.80 104.80 112.80
LARGE INDUSTRIAL 1,699.94 1,825.68 1,971.73 2,129.47 2,299.83 2,483.82

RESIDENTIAL
Zones 1-2 $2.45 $2.79 $3.01 $3.25 $3.51 $3.79
Zones 3-5 3.04 - 3.63 3.82 4.13 4.46 4.82 5.21
NON-RESIDENTIAL 2.59 - 3.05 2.79 3.01 3.25 3.51 3.79
Includes commercial, institutional, irrigation and other non-residential accounts Hydropneumatic Pump Surcharge 0.40 0.68 0.73 0.79 0.85 0.92 LARGE INDUSTRIAL 1.84 1.99 2.15 2.32 2.51 2.71
Proposed Water Rates
Proposed Water Rates Effective

FIXED SERVICE CHARGES
Fixed service charges per day

VOLUME CHARGES
Billed based on metered water consumption ($ per hundred cubic feet)

Proposed Water Rates & Pass-Through Adjustments for Customers in the Willotta Oaks Subdivision on the following page.

Sample Water Bill Calculation for a Typical Single Family Home (Effective January 1, 2026) Based on the proposed water rates effective January 1, 2026, the monthly water bill for a typical single family home in Residential Zones 1-2 using 10 hcf of water (about 250 gallons per day) in a 30-day month would be calculated as follows:

Economic Hardship Discount
The City provides an Economic Hardship discount to water service charges to customers that qualify based on income and apply to the City for the discount. Eligibility is currently based on US Dept. of Housing & Urban Development Very Low Income Limits for Solano County. The City is proposing to increase the discount corresponding with proposed water rate increases as follows:

Proposed Future Pass-Through Rate Adjustments for Wholesale Water Supply Charges The City purchases untreated wholesale water supply from the Solano County Water Agency and Solano Irrigation District. Wholesale water charges from these agencies may be subject to unanticipated increases that are outside the City’s control. [To provide financial protection for these unanticipated cost increases,] the City is proposing to authorize the pass-through of increases to future wholesale water supply charges via corresponding increases to the City’s Water Volume Charges pursuant to California Government Code 53756. However the City is only proposing to pass-through future cost increases to wholesale water supply charges in excess of 4% per year. Future passthroughs would be implemented by [increasing all of the City’s Water Volume Charges per hcf by the same amount (in cents per hcf) corresponding with the weighted average cost per hcf of water supply adopted by the City’s wholesale water suppliers]. Prior to passing through any wholesale water rate increase, the City will notify all customers at least 30 days prior to implementation. These pass-throughs would only apply to customers connected to the City’s water system.

Proposed Water Rates & Pass-Through Adjustments for Customers in Willotta Oaks The City currently bills a small number of water customers located in the Willotta Oaks subdivision, which is outside the City’s [water system service area]. These customers receive water service from the City of Vallejo’s Lake Area water system. The City of Vallejo charges Fairfield for providing water service to these customers. The City of Fairfield is proposing to pass through the cost of service to customers in Willotta Oaks by charging water rates that correspond with Vallejo’s charges to the City for providing water service, without markup. Fairfield’s proposed water rates for customers in the Willotta Oaks subdivision that [receive water supply from the City of Vallejo] are based on current charges levied by the City of Vallejo onto the City of Fairfield are as follows:

Proposed Water Rates Effective January 1, 2026
 Fixed Service Charge: $0.29 per day per residential dwelling unit or equivalent, plus  Volume Charge: $16.21 per hcf billed based on metered water consumption.

The City is also proposing to authorize the pass-through of future increases to the charges for water billed to Fairfield by the City of Vallejo for water service to customers in the Willotta Oaks subdivision, pursuant to California Government Code 53756. These pass-throughs would be applied by a) increasing Fixed Charges by the same percentage increase to applicable fixed charges adopted by the City of Vallejo for service customers in Willotta Oaks, and b) increasing Volume Charges by the same amount (in cents per hcf) corresponding with increases to usage charges adopted by the City of Vallejo for service to customers in Willotta Oaks.

How to Protest the Proposed Water Rate Increases - Written Protests The proposed water rate increases are subject to a majority written protest process under Article XIII D, Section 6 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). At the Public Hearing, the City Council will accept and consider all Written Protests and written comments and hear all oral comments on the water rates as proposed to be modified and increased. However, only Written Protests will be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest. Any record owner of a property that receives water service from the City or any tenant who is directly liable for payment of the City’s water service charges (a customer of record) may submit a Written Protest against the proposed water Fixed Service Charge Volume Charge Total Charge $1.04 x 30 days = $31.20 $2.79 x 10 hcf = $27.90 $59.10 Current Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1
Discount 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

ECONOMIC HARDSHIP DISCOUNT
Annual Discount/Rebate $158.00 $171.00 $185.00 $200.00 $216.00 $233.00

rates. Owners of multiple parcels in the City may file a Written Protest for each parcel owned within the City by filing a separate Written Protest for each parcel or by filing a single Written Protest that identifies multiple parcels. Only one Written Protest per parcel against the proposed water rates, submitted by the record owner of the parcel or a customer of record, will be counted in determining whether a majority protest exists.

Written Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk at 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533, emailed to the City Clerk at cityclerk.ca.gov, hand delivered to the City Clerk’s Office on the 4th floor of City Hall or hand delivered to the City Clerk in the Council Chamber at the Public Hearing prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing. Written Protests that are emailed, mailed or hand delivered to the City Clerk’s Office must be received by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on November 4, 2025.

To be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest, a Written Protest must include all of the following:

1. Clearly stated opposition to the proposed water rates;

2. Identification of the parcel(s) for which the Written Protest is made (by assessor’s parcel number or street address);

3. Legibly printed name of the record owner or customer of record submitting the Written Protest; and

4. Original signature of the record owner or customer of record submitting the Written Protest.

What is a Majority Protest?
A majority protest against the proposed water rates will exist if, at the end of the Public Hearing, there are written protests submitted, and not withdrawn, that represent a majority of the parcels (50% +1) that receive water service from the City. The City Council cannot adopt the proposed water rates if a majority protest exists.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies - Written Objections How do I preserve my ability to judicially challenge the proposed water rates? Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53759.1 and 53759.2, a person or entity will be prohibited from bringing a judicial action or proceeding alleging that the proposed water rates do not comply with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (adopted by Proposition 218) unless that person or entity has timely submitted a Written Objection to the proposed water rates. This is known as an Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies requirement and is separate from the Proposition 218 majority protest process described above.

To exhaust your administrative remedies, your Written Objection must include the specific grounds for alleging noncompliance of the proposed water rates with Article XIII D of the California Constitution .

Written Objections may be mailed to City Clerk at 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533, emailed to the City Clerk at [email protected], or hand delivered to the City Clerk’s Office on the 4th floor of City Hall and the must be received by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on August 27, 2025. Note that this deadline for submitting a Written Objection is earlier than the deadline for submitting a Written Protest to provide the City with time to respond.

A failure to timely object to the proposed water rates in writing bars any right to challenge the proposed water rates through a legal proceeding. The City will respond in writing to all Written Objections received by the deadline. The City Council is tentatively scheduled to consider written responses to Written Objections at the October 21, 2025 Council meeting.

A Written Objection that also complies with the requirements for a Written Protest (see “How to Protest The Proposed Water Rate Increases” above) will be also be counted as a Written Protest in determining whether a majority protest exists against the proposed water rate increases.

Statute of Limitations for Challenging The Proposed Water Rates If the City Council adopts the proposed water rates, then pursuant to California Government Code Section 53759, there is a 120-day statute of limitations for judicially challenging the water rates that runs from the date the City Council adopts a resolution approving the water rates.

Further Information
Additional information regarding the proposed modifications and increases to the water rates, including frequently asked questions, the reasons for the proposed modifications and increases to the water rates, the basis upon which they were calculated, and the amount of the proposed rates are described in more detail in the Water Rate Study posted at www.fairfield.ca.gov/waterrates and available for review at the City Clerk’s office (707) 428-7402 or City Manager’s office (707) 428-7400, both located at 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California 94533. The written basis upon which the proposed rates were calculated will be mailed or emailed to a property owner upon request.

Agenda Item No: R.1

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 17, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-120 PW Approving Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Smith Ranch Assessments District
Approving the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Boundaries and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the Smith Ranch Assessment District
Funding Source: $4,804,620; Smith Ranch Assessment District Fund Contact: Chris Lewis, (707) 428-7089

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Hold public hearing and adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The adoption of this resolution will approve the fiscal year (FY) 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report and provide for the levy and collection of assessments within the Smith Ranch Assessment District (District) for the maintenance of streets, storm drainage, and other infrastructure within the District.

DISCUSSION
The City formed the District in 1986. In addition to providing funding for some of the initial infrastructure improvements for the Rancho Solano subdivision, the District also provides for the collection of annual assessments to fund the ongoing maintenance or repair of the improvements and open space within the District.

The funding for maintenance projects in the District requires the accrual of funds over time. Since the formation of the District, several major maintenance projects have been completed.

The engineers’ report contains a complete description of the lots and parcels of land within the boundaries of the District, an estimate of maintenance and repair costs during the next FY and the assessment levies upon lots and parcels of land.

The FY 2025-2026 levy for the District is proposed to remain at the FY 2024-2025 levy of $325 per parcel, which does not exceed the District’s adopted assessment range maximum of $395 per parcel established in 1996.

The total proposed FY 2025-2026 revenue for the District is $468,833, which includes assessments of $389,925 and interest of $78,908. The total proposed FY 2025-2026 expenditure for the District is $4,804,620, which includes project costs of $4,800,000 and administrative costs of $4,620.

Funding for maintenance projects in the District requires the accrual of assessments over time.

Since the formation of the District, several major maintenance projects have been completed. As part of the City’s FY 2023-2024 to FY 2027-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the District will fund the 2025 Rancho Solano Pavement Maintenance Project ($2,400,000 by the end of FY 2024- 2025) and the 2026 Rancho Solano Pavement Maintenance Project ($300,000 by the end of FY 2024-2025 and $4,800,000 in FY 2025-2026). Both projects consist of pavement grinding, crack sealing, adjusting manholes/valves/monuments to grade, and application of an asphalt rubber cape seal, slurry seal, asphalt overlay, and pavement rehabilitation on various streets throughout the Rancho Solano community.

The adoption of this resolution will grant final approval of the FY 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report and order the levy and collection of FY 2025-2026 assessments for the Smith Ranch Assessment District.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total proposed expenditure for the District is $4,804,620, which will be paid from the Smith Ranch Assessment District Fund 178.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
If the City Council has any questions regarding the adoption of this resolution, this item may be rescheduled until the next council meeting to allow staff to provide the necessary supporting documents. However, not approving this resolution may prevent the City from collecting assessments for the 2025-2026 tax year.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
Chris Lewis, Sr. Management Analyst
(707) 428-7089
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: FY 2025-2026 Smith Ranch Assessment District Engineer’s Report

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-120
APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 2025-67, a Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report, Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments, and Providing Notice of a Hearing Thereon for the Smith Ranch Assessment District, this City Council found the Engineer’s Report for fiscal year (FY) 2025-2026 duly made and filed with the city clerk, to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that the report should stand as the 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to aforesaid resolution, and Tuesday, June 17, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of this council, Council Chamber, Civic Center, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California, or in the manner as specified on the regular meeting agenda, was appointed as the time and place for the hearing by this council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was duly and regularly published; and WHEREAS, at the appointed times and place the hearing was duly and regularly held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to said levy were fully heard and considered by this council, and all oral statements and all written protests or communications were duly heard, considered and overruled, and this council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order the levy of the assessments as contained in said 2025-2026 Engineer’s Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. Property owners owning more than fifty percent of the area of assessable lands within the Smith Ranch Assessment District (District) had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said proposed levy, as a whole or as to any part thereof, or against the District or the extent thereof to be assessed for the costs and expense of the levy as a whole, or as to any part thereof, or against the estimate of costs and expenses, in whole or in part, or against the maps and description, in whole or in part, or against the boundaries or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof, in whole or in part.

Section 2. The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that a levy be made.

Section 3. The District benefited by the improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the city clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto.

RES. NO. 2025-120

Section 4. The Engineer’s Report, as a whole and each part thereof, are hereby finally approved and confirmed, to wit:
a. The estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith. b. The boundaries showing the District, the description of the improvements to be maintained and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within the District.
c. The assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of the improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from the maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto.

Section 5. Final adoption and approval of the Engineer’s Report, as a whole and of the plans and specifications, estimate of the costs and expenses, and the assessment, as contained in the Engineer’s Report, as hereinabove determined and ordered, is intended to and shall refer and apply to the Engineer’s Report, or any portion thereof, as amended, modified, or revised or corrected by or pursuant to and in accordance with, any resolution or order, if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this council.

Section 6. The assessment shall be $325 per parcel, which does not exceed the District’s adopted assessment range maximum of $395 per parcel.

Section 7. The assessment to pay the costs and expenses of the maintenance of the improvements is hereby levied for the FY 2025-2026 pursuant to Section 10100.8 of the California Streets and Highway Code.

Section 8. Based on the oral and documentary evidence, including the Engineer’s Report offered and received at the hearing, this council expressly finds and determines:
a. That each of the several lots and parcels of land will be specially benefited by the maintenance of the improvements at least in the amount, if not more than the amount, of the assessment apportioned against said lots and parcels of land, respectively, and b. That there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of the evidence preponderates in favor of, the aforesaid finding and determination as to special benefits; and expenses of maintenance must be incurred at intervals of more frequent that every five years in order to maintain the level of benefit and the assessed parcels and that the level of benefit incurred otherwise decline more rapidly than usual for the other public

RES. NO. 2025-120

works of the type involved.

Section 9. Immediately upon the adoption of this resolution, but in no event later than the first Monday in August following such adoption, the city clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution with the Auditor of the County of Solano. Upon such filing, the county auditor shall enter on the county assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of assessment thereupon as shown in the assessment.

The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection by the County of Solano, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due to the county for collection, shall be paid to the Director of Finance of the City of Fairfield.

Section 10. Upon receipt of monies representing assessments collected by the County of Solano, the City of Fairfield shall deposit the monies in the city treasury to credit a separate maintenance fund, which maintenance fund the City of Fairfield is hereby directed to establish under the distinctive designation of the District. Monies in the maintenance fund shall be expended only for the maintenance of the improvements provided in these proceedings.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

CONTENTS

1. Assessment

2. Method of Apportionment

3. District Budget

4. Assessments for Each Parcel

1 ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on October 7, 1986, the City Council of the City of Fairfield, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, adopted Resolution No. 86-291, A Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements; WHEREAS, said resolution provided for the levy and collection of maintenance assessments under Section 10100.8 of said Act and reference is hereby made to the Engineer’s Report and diagram on file in the office of the Superintendent of Streets in the City of Fairfield for further particulars;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the council of said city, hereby makes the following assessment for the fiscal year 2025- 2026 to cover the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto.

The amount to be paid for the maintenance of said improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto, are as shown in section 3 of this report.

I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels, respectively, from the maintenance of said improvements.

Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the assessor's maps of the County of Solano for the fiscal year (FY) 2025- 2026 and includes all such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the county recorder of said County.

Dated: __________________ ____________________________
Ryan Panganiban
City Engineer/Asst. Director of Public Works
R.C.E. No. 74795
Expires 12/31/25

2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
The assessments are to be apportioned equally to all 1,200 assessable lots within the Rancho Solano Subdivision.

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FUND 178
FY 2025-2026 BUDGET PROJECTIONS
OBJECT FY23-24 Actual FY24-25 Actual* FY24-25 Revised FY24-25 Proj FY25-26 Proj FY26-27 Proj FY27-28 Proj FY28-29 Proj FY28-29 Proj 6106 - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 389,925 6401 - INT INC ON POOLED INVESTMENTS 90,000 281,743 90,000 101,044 78,908 35,550 37,758 39,988 42,240 TOTAL REVENUE 671,668 479,925 479,925 490,969 468,833 425,475 427,683 429,913 432,165 8441 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - -
8836 - COST ALLOCATION - - - - - - - - -
9003 - ADVERTISING 283 287 700 700 721 743 765 788 811
9038 - COUNTY ADMIN EXPENSES 1,950 3,899 3,899 3,899 3,899 3,899 3,899 3,899 3,899 9100 - TRANSFERS OUT 5,982 - 5,300,000 2,700,000 4,800,000 - - - - 9502 - PJCT CST-ENGNRNG-STUDY/DESIGN - - - - - - - - -
9505 - PJCT CST-CONSTRUCTION 58,753 7,093 1,300,000 - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 62,935 15,311 6,604,599 2,704,599 4,804,620 204,642 204,664 204,687 204,711 Revenue 671,668 479,925 479,925 490,969 468,833 425,475 427,683 429,913 432,165 Expenses 62,935 15,311 6,604,599 2,704,599 4,804,620 204,642 204,664 204,687 204,711 NET SURPLUS/DEFICIT 464,614 608,733 (6,124,674) (2,213,630) (4,335,788) 220,833 223,019 225,226 227,455 Beginning Fund Balance 9,332,909 10,104,390 10,104,390 10,104,390 7,890,760 3,554,972 3,775,805 3,998,824 4,224,050 Net Surplus/Deficit 608,733 464,614 (6,124,674) (2,213,630) (4,335,788) 220,833 223,019 225,226 227,455 Mkt Val-Unrealized Gain/Loss 162,748 - - - - - - - -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 10,104,390 10,569,004 3,979,716 7,890,760 3,554,972 3,775,805 3,998,824 4,224,050 4,451,505 *As of 02/28/25

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1 151 301 1 $325.00
2 151 301 2 $325.00
3 151 301 3 $325.00
4 151 301 4 $325.00
5 151 301 5 $325.00
6 151 301 6 $325.00
7 151 301 7 $325.00
8 151 301 8 $325.00
9 151 301 9 $325.00
10 151 301 10 $325.00
11 151 301 11 $325.00
12 151 301 13 $325.00
13 151 301 14 $325.00
14 151 301 15 $325.00
15 151 301 16 $325.00
16 151 301 17 $325.00
17 151 301 18 $325.00
18 151 301 19 $325.00
19 151 301 20 $325.00
20 151 301 21 $325.00
21 151 301 22 $325.00
22 151 301 23 $325.00
23 151 302 2 $325.00
24 151 302 3 $325.00
25 151 302 4 $325.00
26 151 302 5 $325.00
27 151 302 6 $325.00
28 151 302 7 $325.00
29 151 302 8 $325.00
30 151 302 9 $325.00
31 151 302 10 $325.00
32 151 302 11 $325.00
33 151 302 12 $325.00
34 151 302 13 $325.00
35 151 302 14 $325.00
36 151 302 15 $325.00
37 151 302 16 $325.00
38 151 302 17 $325.00
39 151 302 18 $325.00
40 151 302 19 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
41 151 302 20 $325.00
42 151 303 1 $325.00
43 151 303 2 $325.00
44 151 303 3 $325.00
45 151 303 4 $325.00
46 151 303 5 $325.00
47 151 303 6 $325.00
48 151 303 7 $325.00
49 151 312 1 $325.00
50 151 312 2 $325.00
51 151 313 1 $325.00
52 151 313 2 $325.00
53 151 313 3 $325.00
54 151 313 4 $325.00
55 151 313 5 $325.00
56 151 314 2 $325.00
57 151 314 3 $325.00
58 151 314 4 $325.00
59 151 314 5 $325.00
60 151 314 6 $325.00
61 151 314 7 $325.00
62 151 314 8 $325.00
63 151 314 9 $325.00
64 151 314 10 $325.00
65 151 314 11 $325.00
66 151 314 12 $325.00
67 151 314 13 $325.00
68 151 314 14 $325.00
69 151 314 15 $325.00
70 151 314 16 $325.00
71 151 314 18 $325.00
72 151 314 19 $325.00
73 151 314 20 $325.00
74 151 314 21 $325.00
75 151 314 22 $325.00
76 151 314 23 $325.00
77 151 314 24 $325.00
78 151 314 25 $325.00
79 151 314 26 $325.00
80 151 314 27 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
81 151 314 28 $325.00
82 151 314 29 $325.00
83 151 314 30 $325.00
84 151 314 32 $325.00
85 151 314 33 $325.00
86 151 314 34 $325.00
87 151 314 35 $325.00
88 151 314 36 $325.00
89 151 314 37 $325.00
90 151 314 38 $325.00
91 151 314 39 $325.00
92 151 314 40 $325.00
93 151 314 41 $325.00
94 151 314 42 $325.00
95 151 314 43 $325.00
96 151 314 44 $325.00
97 151 314 45 $325.00
98 151 314 46 $325.00
99 151 314 47 $325.00
100 151 314 48 $325.00
101 151 314 49 $325.00
102 151 314 50 $325.00
103 151 314 51 $325.00
104 151 314 52 $325.00
105 151 314 53 $325.00
106 151 314 54 $325.00
107 151 314 55 $325.00
108 151 321 2 $325.00
109 151 321 3 $325.00
110 151 321 4 $325.00
111 151 322 1 $325.00
112 151 322 2 $325.00
113 151 322 3 $325.00
114 151 322 4 $325.00
115 151 322 5 $325.00
116 151 322 6 $325.00
117 151 322 7 $325.00
118 151 322 8 $325.00
119 151 323 2 $325.00
120 151 323 3 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
121 151 323 4 $325.00
122 151 323 5 $325.00
123 151 323 6 $325.00
124 151 323 7 $325.00
125 151 323 8 $325.00
126 151 323 9 $325.00
127 151 323 10 $325.00
128 151 324 1 $325.00
129 151 324 2 $325.00
130 151 324 3 $325.00
131 151 324 4 $325.00
132 151 324 5 $325.00
133 151 324 6 $325.00
134 151 324 7 $325.00
135 151 324 8 $325.00
136 151 324 9 $325.00
137 151 324 10 $325.00
138 151 325 1 $325.00
139 151 325 2 $325.00
140 151 325 3 $325.00
141 151 325 4 $325.00
142 151 325 5 $325.00
143 151 325 6 $325.00
144 151 325 7 $325.00
145 151 325 8 $325.00
146 151 325 9 $325.00
147 151 331 2 $325.00
148 151 331 3 $325.00
149 151 331 4 $325.00
150 151 331 5 $325.00
151 151 331 6 $325.00
152 151 331 7 $325.00
153 151 331 8 $325.00
154 151 331 9 $325.00
155 151 331 10 $325.00
156 151 332 2 $325.00
157 151 332 3 $325.00
158 151 332 4 $325.00
159 151 332 5 $325.00
160 151 332 6 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
161 151 332 7 $325.00
162 151 332 8 $325.00
163 151 332 9 $325.00
164 151 332 10 $325.00
165 151 332 11 $325.00
166 151 332 12 $325.00
167 151 332 13 $325.00
168 151 332 14 $325.00
169 151 332 15 $325.00
170 151 332 16 $325.00
171 151 332 17 $325.00
172 151 332 18 $325.00
173 151 332 19 $325.00
174 151 332 20 $325.00
175 151 332 21 $325.00
176 151 332 22 $325.00
177 151 332 23 $325.00
178 151 332 24 $325.00
179 151 332 25 $325.00
180 151 332 26 $325.00
181 151 332 27 $325.00
182 151 332 28 $325.00
183 151 333 1 $325.00
184 151 333 2 $325.00
185 151 333 3 $325.00
186 151 341 2 $325.00
187 151 341 3 $325.00
188 151 341 4 $325.00
189 151 341 5 $325.00
190 151 341 6 $325.00
191 151 341 7 $325.00
192 151 341 8 $325.00
193 151 341 9 $325.00
194 151 341 10 $325.00
195 151 341 11 $325.00
196 151 341 12 $325.00
197 151 341 13 $325.00
198 151 341 14 $325.00
199 151 341 15 $325.00
200 151 341 16 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
201 151 341 17 $325.00
202 151 341 18 $325.00
203 151 341 19 $325.00
204 151 341 20 $325.00
205 151 341 21 $325.00
206 151 341 22 $325.00
207 151 341 23 $325.00
208 151 341 24 $325.00
209 151 351 1 $325.00
210 151 351 2 $325.00
211 151 353 2 $325.00
212 151 353 3 $325.00
213 151 353 4 $325.00
214 151 353 5 $325.00
215 151 353 6 $325.00
216 151 354 1 $325.00
217 151 354 2 $325.00
218 151 354 3 $325.00
219 151 355 1 $325.00
220 151 355 2 $325.00
221 151 355 3 $325.00
222 151 355 4 $325.00
223 151 355 5 $325.00
224 151 355 6 $325.00
225 151 355 7 $325.00
226 151 355 8 $325.00
227 151 355 9 $325.00
228 151 355 10 $325.00
229 151 355 11 $325.00
230 151 355 12 $325.00
231 151 355 13 $325.00
232 151 381 1 $325.00
233 151 381 2 $325.00
234 151 381 3 $325.00
235 151 381 4 $325.00
236 151 381 5 $325.00
237 151 382 1 $325.00
238 151 382 2 $325.00
239 151 382 3 $325.00
240 151 382 4 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
241 151 382 5 $325.00
242 151 382 6 $325.00
243 151 382 7 $325.00
244 151 382 8 $325.00
245 151 382 9 $325.00
246 151 382 10 $325.00
247 151 382 11 $325.00
248 151 382 12 $325.00
249 151 382 13 $325.00
250 151 382 14 $325.00
251 151 382 15 $325.00
252 151 391 1 $325.00
253 151 391 2 $325.00
254 151 391 3 $325.00
255 151 391 4 $325.00
256 151 391 5 $325.00
257 151 391 6 $325.00
258 151 391 7 $325.00
259 151 391 8 $325.00
260 151 391 9 $325.00
261 151 391 10 $325.00
262 151 391 11 $325.00
263 151 391 12 $325.00
264 151 391 13 $325.00
265 151 391 14 $325.00
266 151 391 15 $325.00
267 151 551 1 $325.00
268 151 551 2 $325.00
269 151 551 3 $325.00
270 151 551 4 $325.00
271 151 551 5 $325.00
272 151 551 6 $325.00
273 151 551 7 $325.00
274 151 551 8 $325.00
275 151 551 9 $325.00
276 151 551 10 $325.00
277 151 551 11 $325.00
278 151 551 12 $325.00
279 151 551 13 $325.00
280 151 551 14 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
281 151 551 15 $325.00
282 151 551 16 $325.00
283 151 551 17 $325.00
284 151 551 18 $325.00
285 151 551 19 $325.00
286 151 551 20 $325.00
287 151 551 21 $325.00
288 151 551 22 $325.00
289 151 552 1 $325.00
290 151 552 2 $325.00
291 151 552 3 $325.00
292 151 552 4 $325.00
293 151 552 5 $325.00
294 151 552 6 $325.00
295 151 552 7 $325.00
296 151 552 8 $325.00
297 151 552 9 $325.00
298 151 552 10 $325.00
299 151 552 11 $325.00
300 151 552 12 $325.00
301 151 552 13 $325.00
302 151 552 14 $325.00
303 151 552 15 $325.00
304 151 552 16 $325.00
305 151 552 17 $325.00
306 151 552 18 $325.00
307 151 552 19 $325.00
308 151 552 20 $325.00
309 151 552 21 $325.00
310 151 552 22 $325.00
311 151 552 23 $325.00
312 151 552 24 $325.00
313 151 553 1 $325.00
314 151 553 2 $325.00
315 151 553 3 $325.00
316 151 553 4 $325.00
317 151 553 5 $325.00
318 151 553 6 $325.00
319 151 554 1 $325.00
320 151 554 2 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
321 151 554 3 $325.00
322 151 554 4 $325.00
323 151 554 5 $325.00
324 151 554 6 $325.00
325 151 554 7 $325.00
326 151 554 8 $325.00
327 151 555 1 $325.00
328 151 555 2 $325.00
329 151 555 3 $325.00
330 151 555 4 $325.00
331 151 561 1 $325.00
332 151 562 1 $325.00
333 151 562 2 $325.00
334 151 562 3 $325.00
335 151 562 4 $325.00
336 151 562 5 $325.00
337 151 562 6 $325.00
338 151 562 7 $325.00
339 151 562 8 $325.00
340 151 562 9 $325.00
341 151 562 10 $325.00
342 151 562 11 $325.00
343 151 562 12 $325.00
344 151 562 13 $325.00
345 151 562 14 $325.00
346 151 562 15 $325.00
347 151 562 16 $325.00
348 151 562 17 $325.00
349 151 562 18 $325.00
350 151 562 19 $325.00
351 151 562 20 $325.00
352 151 562 21 $325.00
353 151 562 22 $325.00
354 151 562 23 $325.00
355 151 562 24 $325.00
356 151 562 25 $325.00
357 151 562 26 $325.00
358 151 562 27 $325.00
359 151 562 28 $325.00
360 151 562 29 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
361 151 562 30 $325.00
362 151 562 31 $325.00
363 151 562 32 $325.00
364 151 562 33 $325.00
365 151 562 34 $325.00
366 151 563 2 $325.00
367 151 563 3 $325.00
368 151 563 4 $325.00
369 151 563 5 $325.00
370 151 563 6 $325.00
371 151 563 7 $325.00
372 151 563 8 $325.00
373 151 563 9 $325.00
374 151 563 10 $325.00
375 151 563 11 $325.00
376 151 564 2 $325.00
377 151 564 3 $325.00
378 151 564 4 $325.00
379 151 564 5 $325.00
380 151 564 6 $325.00
381 151 564 7 $325.00
382 151 564 8 $325.00
383 151 564 9 $325.00
384 151 564 10 $325.00
385 151 564 11 $325.00
386 151 571 2 $325.00
387 151 571 3 $325.00
388 151 571 4 $325.00
389 151 571 5 $325.00
390 151 571 6 $325.00
391 151 571 7 $325.00
392 151 571 8 $325.00
393 151 571 9 $325.00
394 151 571 10 $325.00
395 151 571 11 $325.00
396 151 571 12 $325.00
397 151 571 13 $325.00
398 151 571 14 $325.00
399 151 571 15 $325.00
400 151 572 2 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
401 151 572 3 $325.00
402 151 572 4 $325.00
403 151 572 5 $325.00
404 151 572 6 $325.00
405 151 572 7 $325.00
406 151 572 8 $325.00
407 151 581 2 $325.00
408 151 581 3 $325.00
409 151 581 4 $325.00
410 151 581 5 $325.00
411 151 581 6 $325.00
412 151 581 7 $325.00
413 151 581 8 $325.00
414 151 581 9 $325.00
415 151 582 2 $325.00
416 151 582 3 $325.00
417 151 582 4 $325.00
418 151 582 5 $325.00
419 151 582 6 $325.00
420 151 582 7 $325.00
421 151 582 8 $325.00
422 151 582 9 $325.00
423 151 583 1 $325.00
424 151 583 2 $325.00
425 151 583 3 $325.00
426 151 591 1 $325.00
427 151 591 2 $325.00
428 151 591 3 $325.00
429 151 591 4 $325.00
430 151 591 5 $325.00
431 151 591 6 $325.00
432 151 591 7 $325.00
433 151 591 8 $325.00
434 151 591 9 $325.00
435 151 591 10 $325.00
436 151 591 11 $325.00
437 151 591 12 $325.00
438 151 591 13 $325.00
439 151 591 14 $325.00
440 151 591 15 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
441 151 592 1 $325.00
442 151 592 2 $325.00
443 151 592 3 $325.00
444 151 592 4 $325.00
445 151 592 5 $325.00
446 151 593 1 $325.00
447 151 593 2 $325.00
448 151 593 3 $325.00
449 151 593 4 $250.00
450 151 621 1 $325.00
451 151 621 2 $325.00
452 151 621 3 $325.00
453 151 621 4 $325.00
454 151 621 5 $325.00
455 151 621 6 $325.00
456 151 621 7 $325.00
457 151 621 8 $325.00
458 151 621 9 $325.00
459 151 621 10 $325.00
460 151 621 11 $325.00
461 151 621 12 $325.00
462 151 621 13 $325.00
463 151 621 14 $325.00
464 151 621 17 $325.00
465 151 621 18 $325.00
466 151 621 20 $325.00
467 151 621 21 $325.00
468 151 621 22 $325.00
469 151 621 23 $325.00
470 151 621 24 $325.00
471 151 621 25 $325.00
472 151 621 26 $325.00
473 151 621 27 $325.00
474 151 621 28 $325.00
475 151 621 29 $325.00
476 151 621 30 $325.00
477 151 621 32 $325.00
478 151 621 33 $325.00
479 151 621 34 $325.00
480 151 621 35 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
481 151 621 36 $325.00
482 151 621 37 $325.00
483 151 621 38 $325.00
484 151 621 39 $325.00
485 151 621 40 $325.00
486 151 621 41 $325.00
487 151 621 42 $325.00
488 151 622 1 $325.00
489 151 622 2 $325.00
490 151 622 3 $325.00
491 151 622 4 $325.00
492 151 622 5 $325.00
493 151 622 6 $325.00
494 151 622 7 $325.00
495 151 622 8 $325.00
496 151 622 9 $325.00
497 151 622 10 $325.00
498 151 622 11 $325.00
499 151 622 12 $325.00
500 151 622 13 $325.00
501 151 622 14 $325.00
502 151 631 3 $325.00
503 151 631 4 $325.00
504 151 631 5 $325.00
505 151 631 6 $325.00
506 151 631 7 $325.00
507 151 631 8 $325.00
508 151 631 9 $325.00
509 151 631 10 $325.00
510 151 631 11 $325.00
511 151 631 12 $325.00
512 151 631 13 $325.00
513 151 631 14 $325.00
514 151 632 1 $325.00
515 151 632 2 $325.00
516 151 632 3 $325.00
517 151 632 4 $325.00
518 151 632 5 $325.00
519 151 632 6 $325.00
520 151 632 7 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
521 151 632 8 $325.00
522 151 632 9 $325.00
523 151 632 10 $325.00
524 151 632 11 $325.00
525 151 633 1 $325.00
526 151 633 2 $325.00
527 151 633 3 $325.00
528 151 633 4 $325.00
529 151 633 5 $325.00
530 151 633 6 $325.00
531 151 633 7 $325.00
532 151 633 8 $325.00
533 151 633 9 $325.00
534 151 633 10 $325.00
535 151 633 11 $325.00
536 151 633 12 $325.00
537 151 633 13 $325.00
538 151 633 14 $325.00
539 151 633 15 $325.00
540 151 633 16 $325.00
541 151 633 17 $325.00
542 151 634 1 $325.00
543 151 634 2 $325.00
544 151 634 3 $325.00
545 151 634 4 $325.00
546 151 634 5 $325.00
547 151 634 6 $325.00
548 151 634 7 $325.00
549 151 634 8 $325.00
550 151 634 9 $325.00
551 151 634 10 $325.00
552 151 634 11 $325.00
553 151 634 12 $325.00
554 151 634 13 $325.00
555 151 635 1 $325.00
556 151 635 2 $325.00
557 151 635 3 $325.00
558 151 635 4 $325.00
559 151 635 5 $325.00
560 151 635 6 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
561 151 635 7 $325.00
562 151 641 1 $325.00
563 151 641 2 $325.00
564 151 641 3 $325.00
565 151 641 4 $325.00
566 151 641 5 $325.00
567 151 641 6 $325.00
568 151 641 11 $325.00
569 151 641 12 $325.00
570 151 641 13 $325.00
571 151 641 14 $325.00
572 151 642 1 $325.00
573 151 642 2 $325.00
574 151 642 3 $325.00
575 151 642 4 $325.00
576 151 642 5 $325.00
577 151 643 1 $325.00
578 151 643 2 $325.00
579 151 643 3 $325.00
580 151 643 4 $325.00
581 151 643 5 $325.00
582 151 643 6 $325.00
583 151 644 1 $325.00
584 151 644 2 $325.00
585 151 644 3 $325.00
586 151 644 4 $325.00
587 151 644 5 $325.00
588 151 645 1 $325.00
589 151 645 2 $325.00
590 151 645 3 $325.00
591 151 645 4 $325.00
592 151 645 5 $325.00
593 151 645 6 $325.00
594 151 652 3 $325.00
595 151 652 4 $325.00
596 151 652 5 $325.00
597 151 652 6 $325.00
598 151 652 7 $325.00
599 151 652 8 $325.00
600 151 652 9 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
601 151 652 10 $325.00
602 151 652 11 $325.00
603 151 652 12 $325.00
604 151 653 2 $325.00
605 151 653 3 $325.00
606 151 653 4 $325.00
607 151 653 5 $325.00
608 151 653 6 $325.00
609 151 653 7 $325.00
610 151 653 8 $325.00
611 151 653 9 $325.00
612 151 653 10 $325.00
613 151 653 11 $325.00
614 151 653 12 $325.00
615 151 654 3 $325.00
616 151 654 4 $325.00
617 151 654 5 $325.00
618 151 654 6 $325.00
619 151 654 7 $325.00
620 151 654 8 $325.00
621 151 654 9 $325.00
622 151 654 11 $325.00
623 151 654 16 $325.00
624 151 654 18 $325.00
625 151 692 1 $325.00
626 151 692 2 $325.00
627 151 692 3 $325.00
628 151 692 4 $325.00
629 151 692 5 $325.00
630 151 692 6 $325.00
631 151 692 7 $325.00
632 151 692 8 $325.00
633 151 692 9 $325.00
634 151 692 10 $325.00
635 151 692 11 $325.00
636 151 692 12 $325.00
637 151 702 1 $325.00
638 151 702 2 $325.00
639 151 702 3 $325.00
640 151 702 4 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
641 151 702 5 $325.00
642 151 702 6 $325.00
643 151 702 7 $325.00
644 151 702 8 $325.00
645 151 702 9 $325.00
646 151 702 10 $325.00
647 151 702 11 $325.00
648 151 702 12 $325.00
649 151 702 13 $325.00
650 151 702 14 $325.00
651 151 702 15 $325.00
652 151 702 16 $325.00
653 151 702 17 $325.00
654 151 702 18 $325.00
655 151 702 19 $325.00
656 151 702 20 $325.00
657 151 702 21 $325.00
658 151 702 22 $325.00
659 151 711 1 $325.00
660 151 711 2 $325.00
661 151 711 3 $325.00
662 151 711 4 $325.00
663 151 711 5 $325.00
664 151 711 6 $325.00
665 151 711 7 $325.00
666 151 711 8 $325.00
667 151 711 9 $325.00
668 151 711 10 $325.00
669 151 711 11 $325.00
670 151 711 12 $325.00
671 151 711 13 $325.00
672 151 711 14 $325.00
673 151 711 15 $325.00
674 151 711 16 $325.00
675 151 711 17 $325.00
676 151 711 18 $325.00
677 151 711 19 $325.00
678 151 711 20 $325.00
679 151 711 21 $325.00
680 151 711 22 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
681 151 711 23 $325.00
682 151 711 24 $325.00
683 151 712 2 $325.00
684 151 712 3 $325.00
685 151 712 4 $325.00
686 151 712 5 $325.00
687 151 712 6 $325.00
688 151 712 7 $325.00
689 151 712 8 $325.00
690 151 721 1 $325.00
691 151 721 2 $325.00
692 151 721 3 $325.00
693 151 721 4 $325.00
694 151 721 5 $325.00
695 151 722 1 $325.00
696 151 722 2 $325.00
697 151 722 3 $325.00
698 151 722 4 $325.00
699 151 722 5 $325.00
700 151 722 6 $325.00
701 151 722 7 $325.00
702 151 723 1 $325.00
703 151 723 2 $325.00
704 151 723 3 $325.00
705 151 723 4 $325.00
706 151 723 5 $325.00
707 151 723 6 $325.00
708 151 723 7 $325.00
709 151 723 8 $325.00
710 151 723 10 $325.00
711 151 723 11 $325.00
712 151 723 12 $325.00
713 151 723 13 $325.00
714 151 723 14 $325.00
715 151 723 15 $325.00
716 151 723 16 $325.00
717 151 731 1 $325.00
718 151 731 2 $325.00
719 151 731 3 $325.00
720 151 731 4 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
721 151 731 5 $325.00
722 151 731 6 $325.00
723 151 731 7 $325.00
724 151 731 8 $325.00
725 151 731 9 $325.00
726 151 731 10 $325.00
727 151 731 12 $325.00
728 151 731 13 $325.00
729 151 731 14 $325.00
730 151 731 15 $325.00
731 151 731 16 $325.00
732 151 731 17 $325.00
733 151 731 18 $325.00
734 151 731 19 $325.00
735 151 731 20 $325.00
736 151 731 21 $325.00
737 151 731 22 $325.00
738 151 731 23 $325.00
739 151 731 24 $325.00
740 151 732 1 $325.00
741 151 732 2 $325.00
742 151 732 3 $325.00
743 151 732 4 $325.00
744 151 732 5 $325.00
745 151 732 6 $325.00
746 151 732 7 $325.00
747 151 732 8 $325.00
748 151 732 9 $325.00
749 151 732 10 $325.00
750 151 732 11 $325.00
751 151 732 12 $325.00
752 151 732 13 $325.00
753 151 732 14 $325.00
754 151 733 1 $325.00
755 151 733 2 $325.00
756 151 733 3 $325.00
757 151 733 4 $325.00
758 151 733 5 $325.00
759 151 733 6 $325.00
760 151 733 7 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
761 151 742 1 $325.00
762 151 742 2 $325.00
763 151 742 3 $325.00
764 151 742 4 $325.00
765 151 742 5 $325.00
766 151 742 6 $325.00
767 151 742 7 $325.00
768 151 742 8 $325.00
769 151 742 9 $325.00
770 151 743 1 $325.00
771 151 743 2 $325.00
772 151 743 3 $325.00
773 151 743 4 $325.00
774 151 743 5 $325.00
775 151 743 6 $325.00
776 151 743 7 $325.00
777 151 743 8 $325.00
778 151 743 9 $325.00
779 151 743 10 $325.00
780 151 743 11 $325.00
781 151 743 12 $325.00
782 151 751 2 $325.00
783 151 751 3 $325.00
784 151 751 4 $325.00
785 151 751 5 $325.00
786 151 751 6 $325.00
787 151 751 7 $325.00
788 151 751 8 $325.00
789 151 751 9 $325.00
790 151 752 2 $325.00
791 151 752 3 $325.00
792 151 752 4 $325.00
793 151 760 4 $325.00
794 151 760 5 $325.00
795 151 760 6 $325.00
796 151 760 7 $325.00
797 151 760 8 $325.00
798 151 760 9 $325.00
799 151 760 10 $325.00
800 151 760 12 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
801 151 760 13 $325.00
802 151 760 14 $325.00
803 151 760 15 $325.00
804 151 760 16 $325.00
805 151 760 17 $325.00
806 151 770 2 $325.00
807 151 770 3 $325.00
808 151 770 4 $325.00
809 151 770 5 $325.00
810 151 770 6 $325.00
811 151 770 7 $325.00
812 151 770 8 $325.00
813 151 770 9 $325.00
814 151 770 10 $325.00
815 151 770 11 $325.00
816 151 770 12 $325.00
817 151 770 13 $325.00
818 151 770 14 $325.00
819 151 770 18 $325.00
820 151 770 19 $325.00
821 151 770 20 $325.00
822 151 770 21 $325.00
823 151 770 22 $325.00
824 151 770 23 $325.00
825 151 770 24 $325.00
826 151 770 25 $325.00
827 151 770 27 $325.00
828 151 770 28 $325.00
829 151 770 29 $325.00
830 151 770 30 $325.00
831 151 780 2 $325.00
832 151 780 3 $325.00
833 151 780 4 $325.00
834 151 780 5 $325.00
835 151 780 6 $325.00
836 151 780 7 $325.00
837 151 780 8 $325.00
838 151 780 9 $325.00
839 151 780 10 $325.00
840 151 780 11 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
841 151 780 12 $325.00
842 151 780 13 $325.00
843 151 780 14 $325.00
844 151 780 15 $325.00
845 151 780 16 $325.00
846 151 780 19 $325.00
847 151 780 20 $325.00
848 151 790 1 $325.00
849 151 790 2 $325.00
850 151 790 3 $325.00
851 151 790 4 $325.00
852 151 790 5 $325.00
853 151 790 6 $325.00
854 151 790 7 $325.00
855 151 790 8 $325.00
856 151 790 9 $325.00
857 151 790 11 $325.00
858 151 790 12 $325.00
859 151 790 13 $325.00
860 151 790 14 $325.00
861 151 790 15 $325.00
862 151 790 16 $325.00
863 151 790 17 $325.00
864 151 790 18 $325.00
865 151 790 19 $325.00
866 151 790 20 $325.00
867 151 790 23 $325.00
868 151 790 24 $325.00
869 151 790 25 $325.00
870 151 790 26 $325.00
871 151 790 27 $325.00
872 151 790 28 $325.00
873 151 790 29 $325.00
874 151 790 30 $325.00
875 151 790 31 $325.00
876 151 790 32 $325.00
877 151 790 39 $325.00
878 151 790 40 $325.00
879 151 790 41 $325.00
880 151 790 42 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
881 151 790 43 $325.00
882 151 790 44 $325.00
883 151 790 45 $325.00
884 151 790 46 $325.00
885 151 790 47 $325.00
886 151 790 48 $325.00
887 151 800 1 $325.00
888 151 800 2 $325.00
889 151 800 3 $325.00
890 151 800 4 $325.00
891 151 800 5 $325.00
892 151 800 6 $325.00
893 151 800 7 $325.00
894 151 800 8 $325.00
895 151 800 9 $325.00
896 151 800 10 $325.00
897 151 800 11 $325.00
898 151 800 12 $325.00
899 151 800 16 $325.00
900 151 800 17 $325.00
901 151 800 18 $325.00
902 151 800 19 $325.00
903 151 800 20 $325.00
904 151 800 21 $325.00
905 151 800 22 $325.00
906 151 800 23 $325.00
907 151 800 24 $325.00
908 151 800 25 $325.00
909 151 800 26 $325.00
910 151 800 27 $325.00
911 151 800 28 $325.00
912 151 800 29 $325.00
913 151 800 30 $325.00
914 151 800 31 $325.00
915 151 870 1 $325.00
916 151 870 3 $325.00
917 151 870 4 $325.00
918 151 870 5 $325.00
919 151 890 2 $325.00
920 151 890 3 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
921 151 890 4 $325.00
922 151 890 5 $325.00
923 151 890 6 $325.00
924 151 890 7 $325.00
925 151 890 8 $325.00
926 151 890 9 $325.00
927 151 890 10 $325.00
928 151 890 11 $325.00
929 151 890 12 $325.00
930 151 890 13 $325.00
931 151 890 14 $325.00
932 151 890 15 $325.00
933 151 890 16 $325.00
934 151 890 17 $325.00
935 151 890 18 $325.00
936 151 890 19 $325.00
937 151 890 20 $325.00
938 151 890 21 $325.00
939 151 890 22 $325.00
940 151 900 1 $325.00
941 151 900 2 $325.00
942 151 900 3 $325.00
943 151 900 4 $325.00
944 151 900 5 $325.00
945 151 900 6 $325.00
946 151 900 7 $325.00
947 151 900 8 $325.00
948 151 900 9 $325.00
949 151 900 10 $325.00
950 151 900 11 $325.00
951 151 900 12 $325.00
952 151 900 13 $325.00
953 151 900 14 $325.00
954 151 900 15 $325.00
955 151 900 16 $325.00
956 151 900 17 $325.00
957 151 900 18 $325.00
958 151 921 2 $325.00
959 151 921 3 $325.00
960 151 921 4 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
961 151 921 5 $325.00
962 151 921 6 $325.00
963 151 921 7 $325.00
964 151 921 8 $325.00
965 151 921 9 $325.00
966 151 921 10 $325.00
967 151 921 11 $325.00
968 151 922 1 $325.00
969 151 922 2 $325.00
970 151 922 3 $325.00
971 151 922 4 $325.00
972 151 922 5 $325.00
973 151 922 6 $325.00
974 151 922 7 $325.00
975 151 922 8 $325.00
976 151 922 9 $325.00
977 151 922 10 $325.00
978 151 923 1 $325.00
979 151 923 2 $325.00
980 151 923 4 $325.00
981 151 923 5 $325.00
982 151 923 6 $325.00
983 151 923 7 $325.00
984 151 930 1 $325.00
985 151 930 2 $325.00
986 151 930 3 $325.00
987 151 930 4 $325.00
988 151 930 6 $325.00
989 151 930 7 $325.00
990 151 930 8 $325.00
991 151 930 9 $325.00
992 151 930 10 $325.00
993 151 930 11 $325.00
994 151 930 12 $325.00
995 151 930 13 $325.00
996 151 930 14 $325.00
997 151 930 15 $325.00
998 151 930 16 $325.00
999 151 930 17 $325.00
1000 151 930 18 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1001 151 930 19 $325.00
1002 151 930 20 $325.00
1003 151 930 21 $325.00
1004 151 930 22 $325.00
1005 151 930 23 $325.00
1006 151 930 24 $325.00
1007 151 930 26 $325.00
1008 151 930 27 $325.00
1009 151 930 28 $325.00
1010 151 930 29 $325.00
1011 151 930 30 $325.00
1012 151 930 31 $325.00
1013 151 930 32 $325.00
1014 151 930 33 $325.00
1015 151 930 34 $325.00
1016 151 930 35 $325.00
1017 151 930 36 $325.00
1018 151 930 37 $325.00
1019 151 930 38 $325.00
1020 151 941 1 $325.00
1021 151 941 2 $325.00
1022 151 941 3 $325.00
1023 151 941 4 $325.00
1024 151 941 5 $325.00
1025 151 941 6 $325.00
1026 151 941 7 $325.00
1027 151 941 8 $325.00
1028 151 941 9 $325.00
1029 151 941 10 $325.00
1030 151 941 11 $325.00
1031 151 941 12 $325.00
1032 151 941 13 $325.00
1033 151 941 14 $325.00
1034 151 941 15 $325.00
1035 151 941 16 $325.00
1036 151 941 17 $325.00
1037 151 941 18 $325.00
1038 151 941 19 $325.00
1039 151 941 20 $325.00
1040 151 941 21 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1041 151 941 22 $325.00
1042 151 941 23 $325.00
1043 151 941 24 $325.00
1044 151 942 1 $325.00
1045 151 942 2 $325.00
1046 151 942 3 $325.00
1047 151 942 4 $325.00
1048 151 942 5 $325.00
1049 151 942 6 $325.00
1050 151 942 7 $325.00
1051 151 942 8 $325.00
1052 151 942 9 $325.00
1053 151 943 1 $325.00
1054 151 943 2 $325.00
1055 151 951 1 $325.00
1056 151 951 2 $325.00
1057 151 951 3 $325.00
1058 151 951 4 $325.00
1059 151 951 5 $325.00
1060 151 951 7 $325.00
1061 151 951 8 $325.00
1062 151 951 9 $325.00
1063 151 951 10 $325.00
1064 151 951 11 $325.00
1065 151 951 12 $325.00
1066 151 951 13 $325.00
1067 151 951 14 $325.00
1068 151 951 15 $325.00
1069 151 951 16 $325.00
1070 151 951 17 $325.00
1071 151 952 1 $325.00
1072 151 952 2 $325.00
1073 151 952 3 $325.00
1074 151 952 4 $325.00
1075 151 952 5 $325.00
1076 151 952 6 $325.00
1077 151 952 7 $325.00
1078 151 952 8 $325.00
1079 151 952 9 $325.00
1080 151 961 1 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1081 151 961 2 $325.00
1082 151 961 4 $325.00
1083 151 961 5 $325.00
1084 151 961 6 $325.00
1085 151 961 7 $325.00
1086 151 961 8 $325.00
1087 151 961 9 $325.00
1088 151 961 10 $325.00
1089 151 961 11 $325.00
1090 151 961 12 $325.00
1091 151 961 13 $325.00
1092 151 961 14 $325.00
1093 151 961 15 $325.00
1094 151 962 1 $325.00
1095 151 962 2 $325.00
1096 151 962 3 $325.00
1097 151 962 4 $325.00
1098 151 962 5 $325.00
1099 151 962 6 $325.00
1100 151 962 7 $325.00
1101 151 962 8 $325.00
1102 151 962 9 $325.00
1103 151 962 10 $325.00
1104 151 962 11 $325.00
1105 151 962 12 $325.00
1106 151 962 13 $325.00
1107 151 962 14 $325.00
1108 151 962 15 $325.00
1109 151 962 16 $325.00
1110 151 962 17 $325.00
1111 151 962 18 $325.00
1112 151 962 19 $325.00
1113 151 963 1 $325.00
1114 151 963 2 $325.00
1115 151 963 3 $325.00
1116 151 963 4 $325.00
1117 151 963 5 $325.00
1118 151 963 6 $325.00
1119 151 963 7 $325.00
1120 151 963 8 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1121 151 963 9 $325.00
1122 151 963 10 $325.00
1123 151 963 11 $325.00
1124 151 963 12 $325.00
1125 151 963 13 $325.00
1126 151 963 14 $325.00
1127 151 963 16 $325.00
1128 151 963 17 $325.00
1129 151 971 1 $325.00
1130 151 971 2 $325.00
1131 151 971 3 $325.00
1132 151 971 4 $325.00
1133 151 971 5 $325.00
1134 151 972 1 $325.00
1135 151 972 2 $325.00
1136 151 972 3 $325.00
1137 151 972 4 $325.00
1138 151 982 1 $325.00
1139 151 982 2 $325.00
1140 151 982 3 $325.00
1141 151 982 4 $325.00
1142 151 982 5 $325.00
1143 151 982 6 $325.00
1144 151 982 7 $325.00
1145 151 982 8 $325.00
1146 151 982 9 $325.00
1147 151 982 10 $325.00
1148 151 982 11 $325.00
1149 151 982 12 $325.00
1150 151 982 13 $325.00
1151 151 982 14 $325.00
1152 151 982 15 $325.00
1153 151 982 16 $325.00
1154 151 982 17 $325.00
1155 151 982 18 $325.00
1156 151 982 19 $325.00
1157 151 982 21 $325.00
1158 151 982 22 $325.00
1159 151 982 23 $325.00
1160 151 982 24 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
1161 151 982 25 $325.00
1162 151 982 26 $325.00
1163 151 983 1 $325.00
1164 151 983 2 $325.00
1165 151 983 3 $325.00
1166 151 983 4 $325.00
1167 151 983 5 $325.00
1168 151 983 6 $325.00
1169 151 983 7 $325.00
1170 151 983 8 $325.00
1171 151 983 9 $325.00
1172 151 983 10 $325.00
1173 151 983 11 $325.00
1174 151 983 12 $325.00
1175 151 983 13 $325.00
1176 151 983 14 $325.00
1177 151 983 15 $325.00
1178 151 983 16 $325.00
1179 151 983 17 $325.00
1180 151 983 18 $325.00
1181 151 983 19 $325.00
1182 151 983 20 $325.00
1183 151 983 21 $325.00
1184 151 983 22 $325.00
1185 151 983 23 $325.00
1186 151 983 24 $325.00
1187 151 983 25 $325.00
1188 151 983 26 $325.00
1189 151 983 27 $325.00
1190 151 983 28 $325.00
1191 151 983 29 $325.00
1192 151 983 30 $325.00
1193 151 983 31 $325.00
1194 151 983 32 $325.00
1195 151 983 33 $325.00
1196 151 983 34 $325.00
1197 151 983 35 $325.00
1198 151 983 36 $325.00
1199 151 983 37 $325.00
1200 151 984 1 $325.00

SMITH RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 LEVY

PARCEL COUNT BOOK PAGE PARCEL LEVY
TOTAL $389,925.00