Fairfield City Council
July 15, 2025

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL

MEETING AGENDA

Tuesday, July 15, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom
Notice to Public
The City of Fairfield is committed to providing meeting facilities that are accessible to persons with disabilities and/or have language barriers. To request meeting materials in alternative formats, or to request a sign language interpreter, realtime captioning, or other accommodation, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting at (707) 428-7400.

For individuals with hearing or speaking limitations, dial 711 or (800) 735-2922 (English). For Spanish, Tagalog or other language, please dial (800) 855-3000 and provide the communication assistant with the following City telephone number: (707) 399-4010.

DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS:

Pursuant to Government Code 84308, City Council Members are disqualified and not able to participate in any agenda item involving contracts (other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), franchises, discretionary land use permits and other entitlements if the City Council Member received more than $250 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant who actively supports or opposes the City's decision on the agenda item in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda. Members of the City Council who have received, and applicants, contractors or their agents who have made, campaign contributions totaling more than $250 to a City Council Member in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda are required to disclose that fact for the official record of the subject proceedings. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution and identify the recipient City Council Member and may be made either in writing to the City Clerk before the agenda item or by verbal disclosure during consideration.

Members of the public can observe the meeting on Roku City of Fairfield, Xfinity Channel 26, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99, and web streamed live at www.youtube.com/FFCATV. The public may join the meeting via Zoom at: https://fairfieldca.zoom.us/j/89060213840?pwd=UUd0WlpEMStLemcxbld4dzVMK3Z5dz09 or via phone (408) 638-0968, Webinar ID: 890 6021 3840, Passcode: 7074287400 Pages
A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
B. ROLL CALL
Councilmember Doug Carr
Councilmember Doriss Panduro
Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Councilmember Scott Tonnesen
Councilmember K. Patrice Williams
Vice Mayor Pam Bertani
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy
C. INVOCATION - Pastor David Cobb of The Love Community D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
E. COUNCIL REPORTS
F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
H. CITY CLERK REPORT
I. PRESENTATIONS
I.1 4th of July Parade Awards Presented by Parks & Recreation Program Coordinator Juan Segura
J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects not on the agenda but within the jurisdiction of the council may do so at this time. The council cannot discuss or take action on matters, not on the agenda for this meeting, but councilmembers may briefly respond to statements made or questions raised by the public, ask for clarification from staff, refer the matter to staff, request staff to report back To the council at a subsequent meeting, or place the matter on a future agenda. To speak on an agenda item please use the “raise your hand” feature or press *9 on your phone. Speakers are limited to three minutes per item, as determined by the mayor.

K. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are to be approved with one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests that separate action be taken on a specific item.

Recommended Action:

To approve the consent calendar.

K.1 CM Approval of Meeting Minutes for June 2025 7
Approval of Meeting Minutes for June 2025
Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Esther Beavers, (707) 428-7402
Recommended Action:

Approve the meeting minutes.

K.2 Resolution 2025-148 PW West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project Acceptance
24 Accepting the West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project as Complete Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Roger Dunham, (707) 428-7478
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.3 Resolution 2025-149 PW Professional Service Agreement for Design of Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades
27 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Fairfield and Schaaf and Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers for the Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades Funding Source: $374,583; Capital Water Fund
Contact: Michael Hether, (707) 428-7493
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.4 Resolution 2025-150 PW Solano Express Intercity Transit Funding and Cost- Sharing Agreement
80 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Solano Express Intercity Transit Funding and Cost-Sharing Agreement By and Among the Solano Transportation Authority, the County of Solano, Solano County Transit, the City of Dixon, the City of Fairfield, the City of Suisun City, and the City of Vacaville Funding Source: $537,074; Transportation Development Act Funding Contact: Melissa Minton, (707) 434-3804
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.5 Resolution 2025-151 PW Funding Agreement for Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant New Entrance Project
116
Approving a Funding Agreement between the City of Fairfield and Suisun- Solano Water Authority for the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant Improvements and Manuel Campos Parkway Extension Phase 2 Project, and Authorizing an Update to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Ryan Panganiban, (707) 428-7017
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.6 Resolution 2025-152 PD PMAM False Alarm Program 164 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Services Contract with PMAM Corporation for the Outsourcing of the False Alarm Program Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Dan Marshall, (707) 428-7374
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.7 Resolution 2025-153 PD Approving Acceptance of the California Highway Patrol Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program 2025-26
199
Approving Acceptance of the California Highway Patrol Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program 2025-26 to Reduce Impaired Driving Traffic Collisions and Proactively Remove Impaired Drivers from the Roadway
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Dan Marshall, (707) 428-7374
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.8 Resolution 2025-154 PR Travis Unified School District After School Program 215 Approving an Independent Contractor Service Agreement Between the City of Fairfield and Travis Unified School District Authorizing the City to Provide Contract Services for After-School Program Services
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Kristina Kaunzinger, (707) 428-7470
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.9 Resolution 2025-155 CD Fairfield Forward 2050 Implementation Phase 1 Professional Services Agreement
233
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Dyett & Bhatia to Provide Planning and Consulting Services for Fairfield Forward 2050 Implementation Phase 1
Funding Source: $689,324; ($578,836, Intergovernmental Loan Fund; $110,488, Reimbursement Agreement)
Contact: Jessie Hernandez, (707) 428-7450

Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.10 Resolution 2025-156 CD Approving an Amendment to the City Naming Policy 288 Approving an Amendment to the Naming City Facilities, Donations, Sponsorships, and Capital Campaigns Policy
Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Dave Zellers, (707) 428-7436
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

K.11 Resolution 2025-157 IT Approving Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group
303
Approving an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group to Provide Post-Implementation Services for EnerGov (EPL), Enterprise Permitting and Licensing Software
Funding Source: $42,600; Computer Fund
Contact: Jeff Bertany, (707) 428-7531
Recommended Action:

Adopt resolution.

L. NEW BUSINESS
L.1 CM Minute Action Approving the Mayor’s Appointments 309 Minute Action Approving Mayor’s Appointments to the Planning Commission Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Esther Beavers, (707) 428-7402
Recommended Action:

Approve appointments. Perform oath of office.

L.2 CM Animal Control and Animal Care Services Report 311 Discussion and Direction Regarding Animal Control and Animal Care Services Funding Source: General Fund
Contact: Liz Aptekar (707) 428-7389
Recommended Action:

Receive presentation, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
M.1 Ordinance 2025-06 CD Vista Ridge Zone Change 313

Amending Chapter 25 of the Fairfield City Code, Article I, Section 25.12.3, also Known as the City of Fairfield Zoning Map, to Redesignate the Zoning of 3331 North Texas Street (APN: 0167-130-240) from Regional Commercial (CR) to Mixed Commercial (CM), Consistent with the Fairfield General Plan Funding Source: N/A
Contact: Yee-Lynn Wong, (707) 428-7449
Recommended Action:

Hold public hearing; waive full reading, read by title only, and introduce ordinance for first reading.

N. ADJOURN
ADJOURN TO TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2025, 6:00 P.M., HARRY T. PRICE MEMORIAL COUNCIL CHAMBER.

Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the City of Fairfield to all or a majority of the Fairfield City Council less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at City Hall, in the 4th floor lobby, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California during normal business hours.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
I, Kelly Ballard, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that I have caused a true copy of the above notice and agenda to be delivered to each of the members of the Fairfield City Council, at the time and in the manner prescribed by law and that this agenda was posted at City Hall, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

Agenda Item No: K.1

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: CM Approval of Meeting Minutes for June 2025

Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Esther Beavers, (707) 428-7402

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the meeting minutes.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Minutes need approval by the City Council.

DISCUSSION
The City Council Minutes for June 2025 have been approved by the city attorney and need council approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
N/A

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose to modify the minutes , which will result in bringing this item back at a future date.

COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney’s Office

STAFF CONTACT
Esther Beavers, Deputy City Clerk
(707) 428-7402
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: 2025-06-03 Closed Session Minutes
Attachment 3: 2025-06-03 City Council Minutes
Attachment 4: 2025-06-17 Closed Session Minutes
Attachment 5: 2025-06-17 City Council Minutes

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL

CLOSED SESSION MEETING

TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 2025; 5:30 PM

CITY HALL, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM
1000 WEBSTER STREET, 4TH FLOOR, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533

OR VIA ZOOM

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Catherine “Cat” Moy called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. City Attorney David Lim called roll.

Present in person were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, Vice Mayor Pam Bertani, and Mayor Cat Moy.

No members of the public wished to speak at public comment.

The City Council went into closed session on the following items with the listed people present:

F.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Government Code 54956.8) Property: Red Top Road (City of Fairfield) – APN: 0180-010-190 Agency negotiator(s): Jennifer Rice, Dave Zellers
Negotiating parties: PW Fund B, LP (Buzz Oates)
Under negotiation: Letter of Intent

Present were City Attorney David Lim, City Manager David Gassaway, Community Development Director David Zellers, Jennifer Rice, and Shirfa deBenedictis-Kessner

F.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2-4))
Re: Authentic Fairfield LLC
Commercial Cannabis Retail Business Permit

Vice Mayor Bertani and Councilmember Tonnesen recused themselves after disclosing receiving $5,000 donations each from Jim Englebright of Bright Spot.

Present were City Manager David Gassaway, City Attorney David Lim, and Community Development Director David Zellers.

The City Council came out of closed session.

Mayor Moy adjourned the meeting at 5:45 p.m.

2 ______________________________
City Attorney
________________________________
Mayor

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

June 3, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

_____________________________________________________________________

A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy called the meeting to order at 6:04 pm.

B. ROLL CALL
On roll call were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, Vice Mayor Pam Bertani, and Mayor Moy.

C. INVOCATION - Reverend Brian Levingston of Bethel Community Church Vice Mayor Bertani gave an invocation.

D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
City Attorney David Lim led the Pledge of Allegiance.

E. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Williams reported she took a tour of Meals on Wheels (MOW) at 1000 Union Avenue. She shared that at one time her father received meals from MOW , and what a great organization it is. Next, she reported she took her second tour of The Producers Dairy Foods off of I-80 with the Economic Development staff, and City Manager Gassaway. She said the unique thing about The Producers is that they do not store the milk as it is immediately shipped to distributors, one of the largest ones is Green Valley Costco--"from the cow to the consumer!" She added that she loves to tour local businesses as one of her goals is business retention.

Councilmember Tonnesen reported he had been ill and was hospitalized at North Bay. He thanked the hospital staff and those who sent well wishes.

Councilmember Carr had nothing to report as he was at a work conference out of state.

Councilmember Panduro reported that she and Councilmember Carr sit on the CAP Solano JPA, which is a regional board for homelessness. She and Carr are the two representatives from Fairieeld each city in Solano County has two reps, and the County also has two. The Board also called the "2 x 2 Committee," and is a collaborative effort

2 between local cities and Solano County to address homelessness. The 2x2 meets monthly - the next meeting will be held on June 26 at 6:30 pm at the County Events Center.

Meetings are open to the public. They have a new Executive Director - Deshawn Waters, who gave a presentation at the May 29 meeting on his priorities and future goals.

Lastly, Councilmember Panduro shared that she was proud to read the proclamation for Pride Month at the pride flag raising on June 1 in front of City Hall and to present it to Will McGarvey, Executive Director of Solano Pride, along with fellow Councilmembers Tonnesen and Williams. She said inclusion matters and that she is proud to support the LGBTQ+ community.

Vice Mayor Bertani thanked volunteers, Fairieeld Clergy Action Network (CAN) members, and city staff for assisting with another successful Fresh Food Festival in May at David Weir K-8 Preparatory Academy. They were able to serve 276 households (783 people)! She reported that a town hall meeting would be held June 4 at 6 pm at the Rancho Solano clubhouse regarding forming a Lighting, Landscaping, Maintenance D istrict (LLMD) or other alternatives for the Rancho Solano neighborhood. She urged residents of that area to attend. She reported that another LLMD meeting would be held for the Rolling Hills neighborhood on June 10 at 6 pm at Dunnell Nature Park & Educati on Center and encouraged residents to attend.

Councilmember Sandhu reported that he spoke to Phillip Thompson, a Parliamentarian in Townsville City, Australia, about a possible Sister City partnership. He stated that Townsville City has one of the largest military bases in Australia, is located close to the Great Barrier Reef, and is a thriving commercial center in Northern Australia.

Mayor Moy thanked the Fairieeld Fire and all ierst responders of the Vista Grande iere that occurred on June 2 and burned 6 2 acres. She also thanked the residents for complying with the evacuation notices and CAL FIRE for their assistance with engines, hand crews, dozers, and aircraft. The iere was contained very quickly. Next, she reported that she and City staff attended Fai rieeld High School's culinary program feast, "Falcons Grill," where they were treated to delicious food prepared and served by the students. She shared that one of the students will be attending the Culinary Institute of America in Napa County to become a professional chef. Mayor Moy reported she attended the Glorious Golden Girls event at the Downtown Theatre, a tribute to women between the ages of 85 and 100 who have contributed to the community. She thanked staff for preparing the certiiecates and said it was a "glorious" event!
F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Gassaway did not have a report.

G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney David Lim had nothing to report.

H. CITY CLERK REPORT

3 City Clerk Karen Rees reported that the Landscape Oversight Comm ittee is still seeking applications from residents in District 2. She stated there is also one Planning Commission seat open, and three seats open on the Measure P Oversight Committee.

I. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Tim Dowling spoke about iere hazards.

Elizabeth Harr ison, Phil Stewart, Aaron Gadow, Matthew Kett, James Frye, and Will Sprague spoke about budget cuts and the lack of cost-of-living raises for FEA members of SEIU 1021.

J. CONSENT CALENDAR
The motion carried unanimously (7-0).

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
To approve the consent calendar.

Motion Carried Unanimously

J.1 CM Approval of Meeting Minutes for April 2025
Approve the meeting minutes.

J.2 Resolution 2025-77 PW Increase in Appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget for the Solid Waste Fund
Adopt resolution.

J.3 Resolution 2025-78 PW Updates to the Landscape Oversight Committee Guidelines and Duties
Adopt resolution.

J.4 Resolution 2025-79 PW Professional Services Agreement for Daily and Special Inspections
Adopt resolution.

J.5 Resolutions 2025-80 Through 2025-97 PW Granting Preliminary Approval of Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Engineer’s Reports and Assessments
Adopt resolutions.

J.6 Resolution 2025-98 PW Planning Area 5 – NBR Culvert Crossing Improvement Agreement
Adopt resolution.

4 J.7 Resolution 2025-99 PW Authorization to Increase Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget in Transportation Fund
Adopt resolution.

J.8 Resolution 2025-100 PR Contract Services for Afterschool Programs with Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District
Adopt resolution.

J.9 Resolution 2025-101 FD Requesting Industrial Emergency Council Budget Adjustment
Adopt resolution.

K. NEW BUSINESS
K.1 CD Consultant Services Agreement for a New Downtown Fairfield Property- Based Improvement District or Community Benefit Improvement District President of New City America, Inc. Marco Li Mandri gave a presentation.

Council received the report. Deana Morad spoke on Item K.1.

After a lengthy discussion, council decided to move forward with the contract with New City America, Inc. The motion carried 7-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Manveer Sandhu
Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

Motion Carried Unanimously

K.2 CM City Council Fiscal Year 2025-2027 Strategic Goals and Priorities City Manager David Gassaway gave a presentation. There were no requests to speak.

Council received the report. Mayor Moy made a motion to approve the City Council Goals & Priorities for 2025 -2027, with two amendments: 1) under Housing, she would like to add the need for executive and workforce housing 2) under Values, she would like to add safety.

Councilmember Tonnesen seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0.

Moved by: Mayor Moy
Seconded by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

5 Motion Carried Unanimously

L. PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.1 HR Public Hearing Regarding Vacancies for Calendar Year 2024 Mayor Moy opened the public hearing. Human Resources Manager Angela Broaddus of Operations and Recruitment gave a presentation regarding vacancies for calendar year 2024. There were no requests to speak. Mayor Moy closed the public hearing.

Motion carried 7-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Panduro
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Receive report and hold public hearing.

Motion Carried Unanimously

L.2 Resolution 2025-102 PD Parking Fee Schedule
Police Sergeant Robert Piro gave a presentation. Mayor Moy opened the public hearing. Deana Morad spoke on Item L.2. Mayor Moy closed the public hearing.

Motion carried 7-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Tonnesen
Seconded by: Vice Mayor Bertani
Hold Public Hearing and adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

L.3 Ordinance 2025-04 FD Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Fire Marshal Steven Conti gave a presentation. Mayor Moy opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak. Mayor Moy closed the public hearing.

Vice Mayor Bertani made a motion to waive the full reading of O rdinance 2025- 04, read by title only, and introduce the ordinance for ierst reading.

Councilmember Carr seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0.

Moved by: Vice Mayor Bertani
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Hold public hearing waive full reading, read by title only and introduce ordinance for ierst reading.

6 Motion Carried Unanimously

M. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:11 p.m. until June 17, 2025, at 6 p.m., at the Harry T.

Price Memorial Council Chamber.

Mayor City Clerk

CITY OF FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL

CLOSED SESSION MEETING

TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2025; 5:00 PM

CITY HALL, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM
1000 WEBSTER STREET, 4TH FLOOR, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533

OR VIA ZOOM

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER

Vice Mayor Pam Bertani called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. City Attorney David Lim called roll.

Present in person were Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu (5:07 p.m.), Scott Tonnesen, K. Patrice Williams, and Vice Mayor Pam Bertani. Mayor Cat Moy was absent.

No members of the public wished to speak at public comment.

The City Council went into closed session on the following items with the listed people present:

F.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9) Workers Compensation Claim by Warren Ducioame
Claim No. 21019885

Present were City Attorney David Lim, City Manager David Gassaway, Angela Broaddus, Human Resources Director Farbod Pirouzmand, and Assistant City Manager Savita Chaudhary.

F.2. Labor Negotiations
Contact: Farbod Pirouzmand

Present were City Manager David Gassaway, City Attorney David Lim, Human Resources Director Farbod Pirouzmand, and Assistant City Manager Savita Chaudhary.

The City Council came out of closed session.

Vice Mayor Moy adjourned the meeting at 5:57 p.m.

______________________________
City Attorney
________________________________
Mayor

1 CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

June 17, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

_____________________________________________________________________

A. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy called the meeting to order at 6:05 pm.

B. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Doug Carr, Doriss Panduro, Manveer Sandhu, Scott Tonnesen, and K.

Patrice Williams, and Vice Mayor Pam Bertani were on roll call. Mayor Moy was absent.

Councilmember Sandhu indicated he would be leaving at 6:30 p.m.

C. INVOCATION - Dr. Michelle King, M.D. of Freedom from Religion Foundation and the Satanic Temple
Dr. Michelle King, M.D., of Freedom from Religion Foundation and the Satanic Temple gave an invocation.

D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance.

E. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Williams reported she attended the grand opening of Highflier Coffee at 680 Parker Road and encouraged the community to pay them a visit. She shared that she attended the recent "Lunch Mob" with Community Development staff at El Pitayo at 620 Jackson Street. She s aid the food is delicious and all made from scratch. Lastly, she attended the Trucks of the Trade event at the Cordelia Library on June 7, which was a fun experience for all!
Councilmember Tonnesen reported that downtown Fairfield construction is close to completion. The trees have been planted, and the sidewalks have been installed. He shared that the old Pepper Belly site will become a beer garden and will hopefully open later this year. Last week, the contractor installed new Bigbelly waste receptacles at each intersection throughout the downtown corridor.

2 Councilmember Carr reminded everyone that the Farmers Market happens every Thursday afternoon, 3-7 pm, on the County Lawn at Jefferson and Texas Streets. He invited the community to attend the second free music concert of the series on June 20 at Rolling Hills Park to hear Papa Joe and the New Deal perform!
Councilmember Panduro reported that she attended the groundbreaking for the new recreation center at 2030 N. Texas Street in District 5 on June 4. T he center is primarily leased by First 5 Solano (an early education program for ages 0 -5) and will include new play courts for pickleball and soccer fields. It is expected to be completed in 2026 and will be a great addition to that area of town.

Councilmember Sandhu reported attending the Summer Music Series concert in Green Valley Vintage Park on June 6. For the third year, he attended the Safequest Fashion Show, a fundraiser for victims of domestic violence. He also enjoyed the Fairfield -Suisun Visual Arts Association annual art fair in Green Valley.

Vice Mayor Bertani thanked City Manager Gassaway and City staff who assisted with hosting two LLMD meetings: Rancho Solano on June 4; and Rollings Hills on June 10. The next LLMD meeting for Rolling Hills wi ll be held July 16 at Dunnell Nature Park and Education Center from 5-7 pm. The next Fairfield Clergy Action Network (CAN) meeting is on June 24 in Vista Conference Room at the Community Center from 3 -4:30 pm, where they will discuss upcoming Fresh Food Festivals at elementary schools in Fairfield (the first two events were very successful!) and they will also discuss holding a Juneteenth celebration in 2026.

F. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Gassaway thanked Assistant City Manager / IT Director Savita Ch audhary for her dedicated service to Fairfield. She has accepted a position as City Manager of Vacaville, and her last day is June 18. She will be missed. Everyone gave her a round of applause! He stated there were no changes to the agenda.

G. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney David Lim had nothing to report.

H. CITY CLERK REPORT
City Clerk Karen Rees reported that the Landscape Oversight Committee is still seeking applicants for District 2, and that there are three seats open for the Measure P Oversight Committee.

I. PRESENTATIONS
I.1 Proclamation Declaring Juneteenth National Independence Day Presented by Councilmember K. Patrice Williams
Councilmember Williams presented a proclamation celebrating Juneteenth to Pastor Vernon Burroughs of Community United Methodist Church.

3 J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jeff Trager spoke about upcoming events at the Downtown Theatre and the Vineyard Jam Festival on June 28 at Solano College.

Ron Bremer, Phil Stewart, Aaron Gadow, and Joe Ortiz, employees and members of SEIU 1021, spoke about budget cuts and the lack of cost -of-living raises for FEA members of SEIU 1021.

K. CONVENE MEETING OF THE PARADISE VALLEY MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING

DISTRICT
The meeting convened at 6:31 pm. Councilmember Sandhu left the meeting to catch a flight.

L. PVMMD PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.1 Resolution PVMMD 2025-02 PW Approving FY 2025-2026 PVMMD Budget and Assessments
Senior Management Analyst Chris Lewis gave a presentation.

Theda Peck, John Egnor, Rick Johnson, and Dr. Mark Carmody spoke on Item L.1.

After a dis cussion, Vice Chair Bertani made a motion to continue the hearing to July 1, 2025. Councilmember Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-2. Ayes - Panduro, Williams, and Bertani. Noes - Tonnesen and Carr.

The PVMMD meeting adjourned at 7:05 pm.

Hold public hearing and adopt resolution.

M. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY N. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY The Joint Public Hearing of City Council and the Housing Authority convened at 7:05 pm.

N.1 Resolutions 2025-103 Through 2025-108 and Resolution HA2025-03 FN Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Adoption
Director of Finance John Furtado gave a presentation. Vice Mayor Bertani opened the public hearing. There were no requests t o speak. Vice Mayor Bertani closed the public hearing.

The motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm.

Moved by: Councilmember Williams
Seconded by: Councilmember Panduro
Hold public hearing and adopt resolutions.

4 Motion Carried Unanimously

O. RECONVENE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:30 pm.

P. CONSENT CALENDAR
The motion carried 5-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Carr
Seconded by: Councilmember Tonnesen
To approve the consent calendar.

Motion Carried Unanimously

P.1 Resolution 2025-109 PW Canon Station Planning Area 5 – Neighborhood C Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Adopt Resolution.

P.2 Resolution 2025-110 PW Water Enterprise Capital Budget Adjustment Adopt resolution.

P.3 Resolution 2025-111 PW 2030 N. Texas Design Agreement Amendment No. 7 Adopt Resolution.

P.4 Resolution 2025-112 PW East Tabor and Tolenas Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Gap Closure and Union Pacific Railroad Agreement
Adopt resolution.

P.5 Resolution 2025-113 PW Resolution to Terminate Reimbursement Agreement for Fairfield Baptist Church
Adopt resolution.

P.6 Resolution 2025-114 PW Linear Park Conservation Easement Agreement and Restatement
Adopt resolution.

P.7 Resolution 2025-115 PD Authorizing Flock Safety Drones for Analysis and Real Time Intelligence Center
Adopt resolution.

P.8 Resolution 2025-116 PD Authorizing the Addition of Two Limited-Term Police Sergeant Positions

5 Adopt resolution.

P.9 CM Minute Action Approving Park Naming to Honor Robbieburr Berger Approve park naming honoring former councilmember Robbieburr Berger.

P.10 Resolution 2025-117 CM Budget Adjustment for Legal Services Adopt resolution.

P.11 Ordinance 2025-04 FD Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Provide second reading and adopt Ordinance 2025-04.

Q. NEW BUSINESS
Q.1 Resolutions 2025-118 and 2025-119 PW Proposed Water Rate Increases and Adopting Procedures for Proposition 218
Assistant Public Works Director (Utilities) Michael Hether and Principal Alex Handlers of Bartle Well Associates gave a presentation.

There were no requests to speak. The motion carried 5-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Panduro
Seconded by: Councilmember Carr
Adopt the resolutions.

Motion Carried Unanimously

R. PUBLIC HEARINGS
R.1 Resolution 2025-120 PW Approving Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Smith Ranch Assessments District
Senior Management Analyst Chris Lewis gave a presentation.

Vice Mayor Bertani opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak.

Vice Mayor Bertani closed the public hearing. The motion carries 5-0.

Moved by: Councilmember Carr
Seconded by: Councilmember Williams
Hold public hearing and adopt resolution.

Motion Carried Unanimously

S. ADJOURN
Adjourned meeting at 8:11 pm to July 1, 2025, 6 pm, at the Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber.

6 Mayor City Clerk

Agenda Item No: K.2

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-148 PW West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project Acceptance

Accepting the West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project as Complete

Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Roger Dunham, (707) 428-7478

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The adoption of the resolution accepts the West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project (CPW090044) as complete.

DISCUSSION
On July 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-187, approving a contract with Cratus Inc. (Cratus) to replace the aging 12-inch water main along West Texas Street between Curtis Drive and Pennsylvania Avenue. The new 12-inch water main will be installed on the north side of the street. As part of the planned improvements for the West Texas Complete Streets Project (Complete Streets Project), City staff identified the existing water main as a conflict due to its locati on within the proposed right -of-way improvements. Given that the existing water main was nearing the end of its useful life, and its relocation was required to facilitate construction of the Complete Streets Project, staff determined that replacement and r elocation of this segment of the water main was necessary.

Construction in West Texas began on September 30, 2024. During construction of the Project, one change order and one administrative change order were issued, resulting in a total contract adjustment of $39,348. The change order addressed the replacement of a 16-inch tee and valves at the intersection of West Texas Street and Pennsylvania Avenue to prevent potential damage during the upcoming phase of the Complete Streets Project, as the existing valves were found to

be inoperable. Upon completion of construction, an administrative change order was processed to reconcile the final contract amount, reflecting quantity reductions in various bid items. The final punch list items for the Project were completed in March 2025.

The construction authorization for the Project was approved for $2,295,678. This amount included a total bid of $2,086,980 and a 10% contingency of $208,698. The final cost for the Project was $ 2,126,328, which is approximately 7.38% below the amount authorized for construction.

Following the council’s acceptance of the project as complete, a notice of completion will be filed with the County of Solano’s Recorder's Office.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Public Works Operati ons Division will manage expenses associated with the ongoing maintenance of the West Texas Street water main, which will be funded by the Water Utility Fund (Fund 461).

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
If the council has any questions, acceptance may be delayed so that staff may provide the necessary additional information.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
Roger Dunham, Public Works Construction Manager
(707) 428-7478
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-148

ACCEPTING THE WEST TEXAS STREET UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE

WHEREAS, the City Council approved a contract with Cratus, Inc. (Cratus) for the West Texas Street Utility Relocation Project (CPW090044) on July 16, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-187; and

WHEREAS, Cratus has completed the Project in accordance with the contract approved by the council.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The City hereby accepts the Project as complete pursuant to the agreement between the City and Cratus approved by the council on July 16, 2024.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

Agenda Item No: K.3

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-149 PW Professional Service Agreement for Design of Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades

Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Fairfield and Schaaf and Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers for the Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades

Funding Source: $374,583; Capital Water Fund

Contact: Michael Hether, (707) 428-7493

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Fairfield Municipal Utility (FMU) provides water to city residents on a continuous basis and is responsible for maintaining the existing water system, while ensuring that the system is designed to meet future growth . On May 6, 2025, the City Council executed Resolution No. 2025 -70 to adopt the Public Utility Master Plan (PUMP). PUMP contains condition assessments of all the City’s pump stations, and the Rolling Hills Pump Station (Pump Station) is considered a medium risk. The proposed professional services agreement will provide professional design services for the Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades project (CPW090068).

DISCUSSION
The Pump Station was originally constructed as an outdoor facility in 1989, with an enclosure added in 2006. The pumps and equipment are nearing the end of their operational life and are scheduled for replacement, and i t is prudent to begin design activities well before an asset progresses to high risk.

In March 2025 , a request for proposals for the Project's design was posted online and on job boards. Two consulting firms submitted proposals for the Project design. Pursuant to Chapter

28.31 of the Fairfield Municipal Code, professional services shall be let on the basis of demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. Following a review process, City staff selected Schaaf and Wheeler Consulting Engineers (Schaaf and Wheeler) as the design engineers.

Once the agreement has been executed, City staff will advertise the Project for bid. Construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2026.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The professional service agreement with Schaaf and Wheeler for design will authorize a contract for a total base fee of $340,530 plus a 10% management reserve in the amount of $34,053. Total authorization for this contract would be an amount not -to-exceed $374,583. Funding for this Project is captured in the Capital Improvement Program through Capital Water Fund (Fund 462; Project No. CPW090068). Schaaf and Wheeler’s proposed design fee for this work is in line wit h similar sized projects.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may delay approval of the professional services agreement so that staff can address any council concerns.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
Bryan Heinzelman, Associate Civil Engineer
(707) 434-6157
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: Proposed Agreement

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-149

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD AND SCHAAF AND WHEELER CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS

FOR THE ROLLING HILLS PUMP STATION PUMP AND POWER UPGRADES

WHEREAS, the Rolling Hills Pump Station is considered critical infrastructure and is essential to providing clean drinking water to city businesses and residents; and WHEREAS, the pumps and equipment at Rolling Hills Pump Station have reached the end of their operational life and are scheduled for a replacement; and WHEREAS, in March 2025, a request for proposals for design of the Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades was posted online and on job boards; and WHEREAS, two consulting firms submitted proposals for the design project pursuant to Chapter

28.31 of the Fairfield Municipal Code; and

WHEREAS, Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers is a well-established engineering firm that has extensive knowledge in pump station design; and WHEREAS, City staff seek to enter into an agreement with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers to design Rolling Hills Pump Station Pump and Power Upgrades.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The city manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Fairfield a professional services agreement between the City of Fairfield and Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers for a contract amount not to exceed $374,583, which is the total proposed fee plus a 10% management reserve ($340,530 total base fee + $34,053 management reserve).

Section 2. The city manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to do all things necessary to implement the above-mentioned contract.

RES. NO. 2025-149

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

1 Revised 1/09/2025

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made at Fairfield, California, as of ________________, 20____, by and between the City of Fairfield, a municipal corporation (the “CI TY") and Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Engineers ("CONSULTANT"), who agree as follows:
1) SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY the services described in Exhib it “A,” which consists of the proposal submitted by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit “A.”
2) PAYMENT. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for services ren dered pursuant to this Agreement at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit “B .” The payments specified in Exhibit “B” shall be the only payments to be made to CONSULTANT for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall submit all billings for said services to the CITY in the manner specified in Exhibit “B.” 3) FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. 4) GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set for th in Exhibit “C” are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency betwe en said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the provisions set forth in Exhibit “C” shall control. 5) INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. The insurance requirements set forth in Exhibit “D” are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the requirements set forth in Exhibit “D” shall control. 6) BUSINESS LICENSE. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep current a business license for work within the City of Fairfield pursuant to Chapter 10B of the Fairfield City Code, with respect to the gross receipts received pursuant to this Agreement. No payments shall be made to any SERVICE PROVIDER until such business license has been obtained, and all fees paid therefore, by the CONSULTANT. Business license applications and information may be obtained from the Community Development Department, Fairfield City Hall, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533-4883, (707-428- 7509) and online at www.fairfield.ca.gov/biz .

7) EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are atta ched hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein.
8) TERM. This agreement shall be in effect through December 31, 2026. 9) GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. Should either Party to th is Agreement bring legal action against the other, the validity, interpretation, and performance of this Contract shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of California, excluding C alifornia’s choice of law rules. Venue for any suc h action relating to this Agreement shall be in the Solano County Superior Court. 10) Where applicable, vehicles with a GVWR greater than 8,500 lbs. and light-duty package delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may therefore be subject to requirements to reduce emissions of

2 Revised 1/09/2025
air pollutants. For more information, please visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-fleets

11) ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including any ot her documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represents the entire and in tegrated agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT.

This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor any p rovision or breach waived, except in a writing signed by both parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. 12) COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in c ounterpart originals, duplicate originals, or both, each of which is deemed to be an original for all purposes. 13) NOTICES. This Agreement is managed and administere d on the CITY’s behalf by the individual named below. All invoices must be submit ted and approved by this individual and all notices shall be given to the CITY using the following contact information:

CITY Contact: Bryan Heinzelman
E-mail: [email protected]
Address: 2900 Vista Grande, Fairfield, CA 94534
Telephone: (707) 434-6157
Notices must be given to CONSULTANT at the following:

CONSULTANT Contact: Lawrence Johnson
E-mail: [email protected]
Address: 4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350, San ta Clara, CA 95054 Telephone: (408) 246-4848

EXECUTED as of the day first above-stated.

City of Fairfield, a municipal corporation

By:__________________________________

CONSULTANT

By:___________________________________
5/30/25
Glen Anderson, Vice President

Schaaf & Wheeler

CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
1171 Homestead Rd., Ste. 255
Santa Clara, CA 95050
(408) 246-4848

April 17, 2025

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR
City of Fairfield
Rolling Hills Pump Station Power and Pump Improvements

EXHIBIT A

Schaaf & Wheeler

CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 246-4848
April 17, 2025
Bryan Heinzelman, Associate Civil Engineer
Public Works, 3rd Floor
1000 Webster Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
Subject: Proposal for Rolling Hills Pump Station Power and Pump Improvements Dear Mr. Heinzelman:

Schaaf & Wheeler is pleased to submit the enclosed proposal to provide professional design services for the Rolling Hills Pump Station Power and Pump Improvements project to the City of Fairfield. Our team is positioned to provide all of the requested professional services to prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the project.

Our firm has worked closely with dozens of public agencies on projects including booster stations, domestic water systems and the intricacies of variable frequency drives, including their impacts to hydraulic systems. We are knowledgeable in applicable federal, state, and local codes and other regulatory requirements that apply to this project. Recently, we completed the Newell Booster Station design for the City of American Canyon to serve their upper water zone for the Watson Ranch Specific Plan.

Lawrence D. Johnson, PE will be the project manager. Lawrence has more than 12 years of experience working on pump station improvement projects throughout Northern California. I will be the principal-in-charge, bringing more than 18 years of experience.

As a vice president and an owner of Schaaf & Wheeler, I am authorized to solicit business and enter into contracts for our firm. Lawrence and I will be supported by Leif M. Coponen, PE, who has more than 20 years of experience. Leif will provide QA/QC services for deliverables before they are submitted to the City. Schaaf & Wheeler has reviewed the City’s Sample Consultant Services Agreement and takes no exceptions.

The enclosed proposal outlines our project approach, work plan, and team qualifications. We welcome the opportunity to meet with the City to discuss our proposal further. If you need any further information or have any questions, please contact Lawrence at (408) 398-7746 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Schaaf & Wheeler

Glen M. Anderson, PE, Vice President
(408) 246-4848 x 217; [email protected]

Table of Contents
Schaaf & Wheeler
Table of Contents
Project Personnel .......................................................................................................... 1 Consultant Staff Commitments .................................................................................... 4 Experience and References ......................................................................................... 5 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................... 9 Appendix A: Project Schedule
Appendix B: Resumes
Cost Proposal (included separately)

Table of Contents
Schaaf & Wheeler 1
Project Personnel
Schaaf & Wheeler has assembled a dedicated team of in-house engineers and subconsultants to complete the proposed project for the City, as outlined in our organization chart. Summaries of individual qualifications and project responsibilities are included below, with full resumes listed in Appendix B. A chart of key personnel commitments is included in the following section.

Schaaf & Wheeler Team
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE: Project Manager, 234 hours
Larry is a senior project manager at Schaaf & Wheeler. He has more than 12 years of experience in pump stations assessment, hydraulic systems, urban water systems, groundwater hydraulics, open-channel hydraulics, water wells and pumps and GIS applications to water resources. He has assessed more than 200 pump stations in the last six years and has recommended improvements and prepared design of improvements for many of them. As project manager, Larry will delegate project tasks to the team while maintaining the schedule and budget. He will meet regularly with City as needed for project updates and to resolve any issues that arise during development.

Glen M. Anderson, PE, PSAP: Principal-in-Charge, 36 hours Glen is a vice president and owner at Schaaf & Wheeler. He has 18 years of experience in potable water, sanitary sewer system, and storm water assessment and design, as well as the associated construction support and management associated with those projects. Glen has worked on numerous sanitary sewer pump station rehabilitation Principal
-
in
-
Charge
Glen M. Anderson, PE
QA/QC
Leif M. Coponen, PE
Project Manager
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Project Engineer
Brett F. Crews, PE
Assistant Engineer
Sandy E. Carroll
Electrical and
Structural
Engineering
TJCAA
Cathodic
Protection
JDH Corrosion
Topographic
Survey
Cinquini &
Passarino

Table of Contents
Schaaf & Wheeler 2
projects throughout the Bay Area. Additionally, Glen has performed condition assessments for more than 120 sanitary sewer and storm water pump stations. Glen has also provided construction support and management services for a variety of projects, including wells, pipelines, storage tanks, pump stations, and generator installations. He is currently managing multiple sewer upgrade projects for the Port of Oakland. As principal-in-charge, Glen will be responsible for contract negotiation and will work with Larry to maintain the project schedule and budget. He will work with City staff to make sure contractual issues are resolved.

Leif M. Coponen, PE: QA/QC, 12 hours
Leif is a vice president and owner at Schaaf & Wheeler. He has more than 20 years of experience leading multi-disciplinary teams for potable water projects from assessment through design and construction. He has planned and designed cost-effective water supply distribution systems for public agencies and private developments across California. Leif regularly provides CEQA support for water and wastewater CIPs and public works projects. He has completed several utility impact studies and water supply assessments for new developments, including the development of a conservation center for the Saratoga Wildlife Care Center. Leif has expertise in modeling water and sewer systems with Bentley’s WaterCAD, Innovyze’s InfoWorks ICM, InfoWATER, and InfoSWMM software platforms. Leif will oversee our quality assurance and quality control efforts.

Brett F. Crews, PE: Project Engineer, 200 hours
Brett is an associate engineer with more than five years of experience in design and construction support for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. He has successfully completed several multidisciplinary projects for public and private company clients in and around the Bay Area. Brett is also experienced in pressurized systems hydraulics, open-channel hydraulics, and GIS applications in water resources. Brett is proficient in AutoCAD, ArcGIS, WaterCAD, InfoWater, InfoWater PRO, and InfoSWMM.

Brett will assist Larry with day-to-day engineering tasks.

Sandy E. Carroll, EIT: Assistant Engineer, 156 hours
Sandy is an assistant engineer at Schaaf & Wheeler with over four years of experience in planning, design, and construction support for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. She acts as a primary modeler for the development and analysis of CIPs with respect to developments, precise plans, and master plans. Sandy regularly assists with development/construction reviews, C3 SWMP reviews and inspections, and CEQA support for private development projects in San Joaquin, San Mateo, and Santa Clara County. She has also completed CEQA utility impact studies and on-call sanitary sewer modeling support for the City of Mountain View. Sandy will assist Larry with day- to-day engineering tasks.

Table of Contents
Schaaf & Wheeler 3
About Our Subconsultants
Electrical and Structural Engineering
TJC and Associates, Inc. (TJCAA) is a small business enterprise providing engineering services to local Bay Area clients, as well as clients throughout the United States. TJCAA provides expertise in the design of infrastructure for water and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, and reservoirs/tanks, as well as flood control structures, bridges, and support facilities. Their head designers, Terry Cavanagh and Paul Giorsetto, each provide over 35 years of experience in delivering creative solutions for special districts, municipalities, and commercial/industrial clients. In 2012, Mike Erwin joined the TJCAA group, bringing his 30-plus years of experience as a designer and system integrator working on control systems in the water and wastewater industry. For more than a decade, Schaaf & Wheeler and TJCAA have teamed on numerous pump station projects for potable water, stormwater, and wastewater.

Cathodic Protection
JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. is an engineering
company specializing in providing corrosion consulting
services to clients in the fields of water and wastewater treatment and transmission, storage tanks, bridges, pier, piling and other off-shore marine structures, sheet pile walls, mining and minerals, aerospace, petroleum refining and distribution, electric power generation, transportation industry, municipalities and state and federal government agencies. They recently provided the City with cathodic protection design for the Oakland Hill Pump Station. They also assisted with the City’s Water Utility Master Plan by performing condition assessments and corrosion testing of reservoirs as well as the North Bay Regional Water Treatment Plant. JDH has collaborated with Schaaf & Wheeler on several infrastructure projects in Northern California, including the Clemente Pump Station Outfall Pipe Repair and Rehabilitation project for the Town of Corte Madera and the Wilson Storm Drain Pump Station Rehabilitation Project for the City of Petaluma.

Topographic Survey
Cinquini & Passarino, Inc. (C&P) was established in 1954 and is headquartered in Sonoma County with offices in Santa Rosa, Healdsburg, Napa, and Oakland. They have extensive experience providing federal, state, local agency, special districts, consulting engineers and private clients with reliable surveying services ranging from topographic surveys, right-of-way surveys, railroad surveys, boundary surveys, remote sensing surveys, hydrographic surveys, GIS services and construction surveys. C&P’s staff utilize the latest technologies in land surveying, hydrography and mapping to increase efficiency while maintaining the high accuracy and quality of survey deliverables for which they are known. They have worked closely with Schaaf & Wheeler on several projects involving pump stations.

Consultant Staff Commitments
Schaaf & Wheeler 4
Consultant Staff Commitments
The below matrix outlines personnel roles and committed time for this project, as well as the locations from which each team member will be working.

Key Personnel Name and
Location
Assigned Project Role Availability
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Santa Clara, CA
Project Manager 20%
Glen M. Anderson, PE, PSAP
Santa Clara, CA
Principal-in-Charge 10%
Leif M. Coponen, PE
Santa Clara, CA
QA/QC 10%
Brett F. Crews, PE
San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer 25%
Sandy E. Carroll, EIT
San Francisco, CA
Assistant Engineer 30%
Jacqueline Arama, PE
Concord, CA
Electrical Engineer 20%
Andrew Calma, EIT
Concord, CA
Electrical Engineer 45%
Ronald Migdal, SE
Oakland, CA
Structural Engineer 30%
Hernando Montoya, PE
Concord, CA
Structural Designer 40%
J. Darby Howard, Jr., PE
Concord, CA
Cathodic Protection

10%
Brandon Olsen, EIT
Concord, CA
Cathodic Protection

25%
Mark P. Andrilla, PE, PLS
Napa, CA
Topographic Survey 30%

Experience and References
Schaaf & Wheeler 5
Experience and References
Schaaf & Wheeler has completed numerous projects similar in size and scope to the City’s proposed project in the last 10 years. Examples of those projects are included below, including reference information.

Client and Contact:

Steve Reilly
330 Land Company, LLC
16381 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618
(925) 365-3128
[email protected]
Project Owner:

City of American Canyon
Contract Value: $157,515
Construction Cost: TBD
Duration: 2024 – 2025
Team Members:

PM: Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Staff: Glen M. Anderson, PE;
Garrett Chick, EIT
Subcontractors:

Biggs Cardosa Associates;
Fehr Engineering
Watson Ranch Newell Booster Pump Station
Schaaf & Wheeler was contracted by 330 Land
Company to design the required publicly
owned/operated fire and domestic booster pump
station for the Watson Ranch Canyon Estates
development located in American Canyon, California.

Multiple developments are currently planned within
the Watson Ranch Specific Plan Area, each requiring
domestic and fire service from the City’s proposed
high-pressure zone. To serve these areas, a booster
pump station has been proposed near the Canyon
Estates development, containing a domestic booster
pump skid and a fire flow skid.

The booster station serves as an interim condition
allowing for early development within the Watson
Ranch Specific Plan to be serviced with domestic and
fire water. Considerations for future gravity tanks
were also vetted during planning of this station to
allow for transitioning of the booster station
operations once gravity storage is built per the City’s Water Master Plan.

Experience and References
Schaaf & Wheeler 6

Client and Contact:

Patrick Breen
Water Resources Manager
Marina Coast Water District
920 Second Ave, Suite A
Marina, CA 93933
(831) 384-6131
[email protected]
Contract Value: $975,000
Construction Cost: $13M
Duration: 2019 – 2025
Team Members:

PM: Andrew A. Sterbenz, PE
Staff: Leif M. Coponen, PE;
Joshua C. Tabije, EIT
Subcontractors:

Denise Duffy & Associates;
Cornerstone Earth Group; TJC
& Associates; The Paul Davis
Partnership; Whitson
Engineers; H.T. Harvey &
Associates
A1/A2 Reservoirs and B/C Booster Pump Station
Schaaf & Wheeler designed the Marina Coast Water
District A1/A2 Reservoir and B/C Booster Station
located on the CSU Monterey Bay campus on the
former Fort Ord. Schaaf & Wheeler had prepared a
Basis of Design report for the project in 2007, but the project was shelved due to the economic downturn.

An updated basis of design report was prepared in
2019, reflecting changes in the pumping targets and
relocating the project site to accommodate the
updated CSUMB master plan.

The project collocates the main B/C Zone booster
pump station with the new A-Zone water tanks. This
change requires extending the wellfield pipeline,
which terminates at the existing B/C Zone booster
pumping station. The project included 5,600-LF of
new pipelines, 12- through 30-inch in diameter, to
connect the new booster pump station to the system
and reroute a portion of the wellfield transmission
main. The design included a shut-down plan to
facilitate making these pipeline connections while
minimizing the outage duration.

During construction, an additional 1,700-LF of a 24-
inch transmission main was added to the project.

Schaaf & Wheeler completed the additional design in
60 days so the pipeline construction would not delay
the system start-up.

Experience and References
Schaaf & Wheeler 7

Reference:

Carlos Sempere
Alameda County Water District
43885 S. Grimmer Blvd
PO Box 5110
Fremont, CA 94537
(510) 668-4200
[email protected]
Contract Value: $810,806.82
Construction Cost: $6M
Duration: 2019 – 2023
Team Members:

PM: Glen M. Anderson, PE
Staff: Logan N. Fox, PE; Brett
F. Crews, PE
Subcontractor:

TJCAA; David J. Powers
Curtner Road Booster Station Rehabilitation
Curtner Road Booster Station is a critical potable
water booster station owned and operated by
Alameda County Water District. The station operates
as an altitude valve vault for Alameda Reservoir and
as a booster station to pump water to the higher
zones in their system. The current rehabilitation
project increases safety and accessibility to the
station and its appurtenances.

Schaaf & Wheeler was hired to prepare design plans
and project specifications to address the concerns of
the District. The design removed all piping, pumps,
valves, structures, and appurtenances and were
replaced to accomplish the design goals.

The design successfully increased accessibility,
safety, and efficiency within the station. Significant
complications in the design stemmed from the limited
space within the station. However, the design
included additional structural improvements and
piping, valves, and pumps to create additional space
within the station to meet the District’s design criteria.

Station construction was completed in 2023. Project
bid prices were substantially impacted by electrical
and mechanical supply chain shortages associated
with Covid.

Experience and References
Schaaf & Wheeler 8
Client and Contact:

Chris Hayes, Kier & Wright
250 Cherry Lane
Manteca, CA 95337
(209) 328-1123 x 3109
[email protected]
Project Owner:

A Government Secure Facility
Contract Value: $310,000
Construction Cost: ~$6M
Project Duration: 2022 –
Present
Team Members:

PM: Glen M. Anderson, PE
Staff: Sandra E. Carroll, EIT
Subcontractors:

DCM Consulting
Site 300 Water System Design
As a subconsultant to Kier + Wright, Schaaf &
Wheeler analyzed a water system for a government
secure facility to size domestic and fire water
pipelines to identified buildings. Our firm also
designed new pipelines using traditional and
trenchless solutions (cable plow, HDD, and open
trenching) across hilly terrain, sensitive habitat and
known contamination sites.

As part of the project, Schaaf & Wheeler analyzed
two existing booster pump stations, which operate in
series. We identified the need to add a
hydropneumatic tank to one station to mitigate
pressure surges. We also added a buffer tank
between the two stations to minimize coordination
issues.

Lastly, we designed pump replacements to replace
one of two large pumps at each station with two
smaller pumps. This gave the station the flexibility to meet the typically small domestic demands of the
system while maintaining the ability to meet fire flow
needs.

Our firm provided all design details, calculations, and specifications to Kier + Wright in order for them to
prepare plans for the project. We are currently
providing construction support for the project. Due to
the security requirements of the client, drawings and
photos are not available.

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 9
Scope of Work
Project Understanding and Design Approach
The Rolling Hills Pump Station (Pump Station) is a domestic booster station housing three PACO end-suction centrifugal pumps. These pumps boost domestic water from the City’s Zone I pressure zone to the Zone II pressure zone. Pump operations are controlled via level monitoring within the Zone II Rolling Hills Water Tank (Tank). The Pump Station was constructed in 1989 as an outdoor station with abovegrade piping and outdoor rated electrical enclosures. The Pump Station was later enclosed in a split- faced CMU building with a timber-frame roof. The existing control panels were left as outdoor rated enclosures at the time the building was constructed. The station is in close proximity to City Fire Station 41 (south side of the station) and an inspector building to the east. The Putah South Canal runs along the northern edge of the Booster Station site, separated by an existing fence.

Since the station’s mechanical and electrical equipment is currently beyond its design life, the City has expressed interest in rehabilitating the station. The rehabilitation includes replacement of all above grade piping, valves, pumps, supports along with electrical cabinets, conduit, conductor and lighting. While internal station improvements are requested for this project, the City would like to keep the existing split-faced CMU building and roof since it was constructed fairly recently in 2006. Therefore, accessibility will be a key component during the initial planning phase of the project. Adjustments to grading around the station, particularly at the station entry driveway will be critical to providing ease of access for maintenance vehicles along with updating the site’s overall drainage.

Surge and Water Hammer
The station’s original pumps were outfitted with reduced voltage soft starters designed to limit both current inrush to the pump motors but also to slowly start the pumps, mitigating large pressure spikes from being initiated into the distribution system. A power failure, or even a normal pump shutoff would still induce potential surge or transient pressure waves into the system. The booster station was originally constructed with a surge anticipator valve, to provide surge/transient protection during an anticipated power failure or sudden pump shutdown. The valve operates hydraulically and senses a low pressure wave, caused by an instantaneous pump shutdown, and opens the valve bonnet. This allows the returning high pressure wave to be relieved instead of rebounding against a closed valve. The surge anticipator valve then slowly closes to reduce additional pressure surge generation.

While the surge anticipator valve assists in relieving pressure spikes during a surge event, vacuum pressures should also be assessed since the initial downsurge can result in vacuum pressures large enough to damage existing pipe. Combination air release and vacuum valves would be assessed at the station high points to alleviate atmospheric vacuum potential. Similar to Schaaf & Wheeler’s recent experience working with Sacramento Area Sewer District and Mountain View, Schaaf & Wheeler

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 10
would analyze site-specific surge potential based on the method of characteristics to confirm any proposed surge mitigation.

Variable Frequency Drives
The existing pumps are also outfitted with Booster Pump Control Valves, however the City has expressed interest in confirming if the BPCVs would still be required if the station were run on variable frequency drives (VFDs). The BPCVs are intended to slowly open and slowly close when a pump is called to start and stop, respectively.

These BPCVs operate once a signal is provided from the MCC to the onboard BPCV solenoid. The solenoid initiates the valve to begin its opening/closing process, which occurs hydraulically. A correctly functioning BPCV will mitigate most surge events under normal operations. A power failure being the one exception, as the valve does not have adequate time to slowly close.

VFDs can be programmed to perform a similar function as the BPCVs, however VFD turndown ability can be impacted by a system’s hydraulic makeup. Systems with a majority of the Total Dynamic Head (TDH) comprised of static head, for example, are limited in terms of how far they can be turned down before shutoff head is reached. The figure below illustrates some assumed values of static and friction losses for the Zone II water system based on the Rolling Hills Tank elevations, distribution main sizes, lengths and assumed pipe roughness.

If suction pressures are high in Zone I (assume 80 psi), then the VFD is shown to be appropriate and operates fairly closely with the best efficiency point. This is due to .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

PSI PSI Design low Required
PAC Type , Imp o. D Pump D Pump

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 11
dynamic friction loss accounting for a majority of the TDH. However, when suction pressures are low in Zone I (assume 40 psi), the pumps are required to overcome much more static lift. This results in static head now accounting for a majority of the TDH in the system. As can be seen from the chart above, at psi suction pressure, the D’s would not be appropriate and would not allow for any turndown. Since Zone I pressures are diurnal and fluctuate throughout the day, S&W will work with the City to confirm boundary conditions at the station to assess applicability of VFDs and any limitations present. If D’s are not selected, then it is important to note that BPCVs or soft starters would be recommended. Schaaf & Wheeler will leverage its extensive experience in VFD hydraulics to ensure the booster station operates as intended and as required by the City.

Building Fire Resistance
The existing building, constructed in 2006, is comprised of split-faced CMU walls and a standing seam metal roof supported on a timber frame. The City has indicated that they would like to explore alternatives to improve the building’s fire resistance. Since the building’s CMU and metal roof already provide robust fire resistance, exploring internal coatings, insulation and/or gypsum board finish for the underside of the roof will be assessed to bolster the building’s fire resiliency.

Communications
Schaaf & Wheeler and our subconsultant TJC and Associates will work with the City to catalog and provide the requested remote signal monitoring and operational capabilities. Analog and digital I/O, and preferred equipment will be coordinated early on with the City to confirm the preferred instrumentation and operability is accounted for in the communications design. Communications for remote generator testing and a dedicated fiber connection to the adjacent Fire Station are currently assumed for project improvements.

Fencing and Security
The site is bounded by existing PVC-coated chain-link fencing with security barb wire with the exception of the driveway access point. While the west and south fence lines are intended to remain unchanged, the northern fenceline will be raised to match the west and south fenceline overall height. This will help raise the existing barb wire along the northern perimeter to prevent accidental injury to operations/maintenance personnel. Schaaf & Wheeler will coordinate project improvements along this property line with the Putah South Canal Authority having jurisdiction as a project stakeholder for early project buyoff and approval. Additionally, existing fencing adjacent to the inspector’s building will be modified to accommodate and enclose the proposed generator.

Detailed Scope of Work
Specific scope items include designing the following improvements as identified in the City’s request for proposal:

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 12
Electrical
▪ Motor Control Center Replacement
▪ Incorporation of Variable Frequency Drives for pumps. Hydraulic assessment to confirm minimum turndown speed.
▪ Relocated existing Meter Main, MCC, ATS, RTU as necessary ▪ Add backup diesel generator, load bank, equipment pad, with ALC and ATS ▪ New conduit and conductor for all electrical inside and outside the building. CMU building to remain.
▪ New interior and exterior lighting.
▪ Evaluate power feed to the adjacent inspector building.

Controls/Telemetry
▪ Include 12 fiber Single Mode network cable from PLC to Fire Station communications room.
▪ Include new Allen Bradley 5380 PLC and IO
▪ Include MDS Orbit Radio (220 Mhz)
▪ Include UPS supporting PLC cabinet, I/O, DKS system, Telemetry and VFD interfaces.
▪ Provide ethernet interface to Generator and ATS (Modbus or E/IP) ▪ Initiate Generator exercise via PLC output
Instrumentation
▪ Replace Flow meter with McCrometer or E&H Mag Flow Meter with integrated display, ethernet/modbus & 4-20mA outputs.
▪ Include Rosemont/Emerson 2088 Pressure Transmitters, 4-20mA output with local display.
▪ Include Surge Anticipator Valve status feedback, physical and electrical ▪ Include Mechanical Pressure Gauges
▪ Include Power Monitoring, AB PM5000 series.

Mechanical
▪ Replace pumps and motors
▪ Eliminate Existing Bypass
▪ Replace all Valves inside the station
▪ Replace the existing AR ’s
▪ Add ARV to suction side pipes
▪ Replace Surge Anticipator Valve, including position monitoring. ▪ Evaluate need for booster pump control valves versus mechanical check valves. ▪ Include floor drains if BPCV are retained to drain wasted water from normal valve operation.

Cathodic Protection
▪ Evaluate need for cathodic protection
Building
▪ Break out concrete slab and repour with new conduit runs, pump pads, and electrical pad.

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 13
▪ Confirm adequate ventilation within the building.
▪ Improve Fire Resistance of the building
▪ Redirect drainage inside of the building to the local storm drain system.

Grading, Access, Fencing
▪ Demo asphalt and concrete between pump station building and inspector building and repour new yard conduits. Construct new concrete around the pump station with appropriate grading to drain away from the buildings. ▪ Demo existing concrete and repour area between records building and fence for installation of generator.
▪ Add storm drain inlets as required for drainage.
▪ Replace fence from the northeast corner of the pump station building along the northern property line to encapsulate the proposed generator.

Gate Controller
▪ Bring existing gate access enclosure up to code
▪ Move DKS system to inside of the Pump Building
▪ Repair Keypad Pedestals
The proposed detailed scope of services and assumptions are included below:

Task 1. Project Management
Project management will be ongoing for the duration of the project. Key components of Schaaf & Wheeler’s project management activities will include the following:

A. Manage its team and overall project activities consistent with direction from the City to meet the project schedule and budget. This includes managing sub- consultants, maintaining the schedule and budget, anticipating and mitigating potential issues and delays, and updating the City on the overall project progress.

B. Coordinate with the City, design team members, consultants, utility companies, other government agencies, and other affected parties as required and manage QA/QC activities for the project deliverables.

C. Organize and attend project meetings with the City to discuss project progress, decisions, and direction of coordinated activities. Meetings will be held at the following project phases:
a. Kick Off Meeting
b. 35% Design Review Meeting
c. 65% Design Review Meeting
d. 95% Design Review Meeting
D. Prepare, monitor, and update progress schedule in Microsoft Project format beginning at the kickoff meeting and ending at contract award for the last submittal package. Schedule updates will be provided for each deliverable milestone listed above (3 total).

E. Provide monthly progress reports.

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 14
Deliverables

1. Progress schedules in MS Project format submitted electronically as an ” x ” PD file and in native MS Project format

2. Meeting agendas, preparation materials, and meeting minutes for each project meeting (in PDF file)

3. Monthly progress reports and invoices (in PDF file)
Task 2. Topographic Survey and Corrosion Assessment
Schaaf & Wheeler’s subconsultant Cinquini & Passarino will perform topographic surveying of the existing station to identify existing utilities, grades, and pertinent surface features for use and incorporation into the subsequent design document deliverables. JDH will perform on-site inspection of in-situ soil resistivities at select locations at the booster station, including inspection of any exposed sections of pipe that will remain. An engineering report will be prepared which will summarize the field data and analysis.

Deliverables

1. Topographic Survey of site features and utilities (AutoCAD DWG)

2. Corrosion Assessment Report (PDF)
Task 3. 35% Design
construction documents will follow the City’s design standards and criteria and will include plans, specifications, cost estimates, and probable project construction schedule. Schaaf & Wheeler’s subconsultants BCA and TJCAA will design the structural and electrical elements listed in this scope of work.

1. Prepare 35% level design plans for city review and comment. Provide design plans to affected utility owners as required.

2. Prepare 35% level technical specifications for city review and comment.

3. Prepare level engineer’s cost estimate for City review.

4. Perform a QC review of the design documents in accordance with the QC program.

5. Conduct a 35% comments review meeting with the City to discuss the comments on the submittal package, identify any significant issues, and gain concurrence as to how the submittal shall be revised as appropriate to incorporate the City’s comments.

Deliverables

1. 35% design submittal package (plans, specifications, cost estimate, and probable project construction schedule)
Task 4. 65% Design
construction documents will follow the City’s design standards and criteria and will include plans, specifications, cost estimates, and probable project construction schedule.

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 15

1. Prepare 65% level design plans for city review and comment. Provide design plans to affected utility owners as required.

2. Prepare 65% level technical specifications for city review and comment.

3. Prepare level engineer’s cost estimate for City review.

4. Perform a QC review of the design documents in accordance with the QC program.

5. Provide written comment responses to all comments received, including written responses for redline drawings.

6. Conduct a 65% comments review meeting with the City to discuss the comments on the submittal package, identify any significant issues, and gain concurrence as to how the submittal shall be revised as appropriate to incorporate the City’s comments.

Deliverables

1. 65% design submittal package (plans, specifications, cost estimate, and probable project construction schedule)

2. Written responses to comments and redlines from the 35% review.

Task 5. 95% Design
Construction documents will follow the City’s design standards and criteria and will include plans, specifications, cost estimates, and probable project construction schedule.

1. Prepare 95% level design plans for city review and comment. Provide design plans to affected utility owners as required.

2. Prepare 95% level technical specifications for city review and comment.

3. Prepare level engineer’s cost estimate for City review.

4. Perform a QC review of the design documents in accordance with the QC program.

5. Provide written comment responses to all comments received, including written responses for redline drawings.

6. Conduct a 95% comments review meeting with the City to discuss the comments on the submittal package, identify any significant issues, and gain concurrence as to how the submittal shall be revised as appropriate to incorporate the City’s comments.

Deliverables

1. 95% design submittal package (plans, specifications, cost estimate, and probable project construction schedule)

2. Written responses to comments and redlines from the 65% review.

Task 6. Final Design
inal signed construction documents will follow the City’s design standards and criteria and will include plans, specifications, cost estimates, and probable project construction schedule.

Scope of Work
Schaaf & Wheeler 16

1. Prepare final, bid-ready design plans for city review and comment. Provide design plans to affected utility owners as required.

2. Prepare final technical specifications.

3. Prepare final engineer’s cost estimate.

4. Perform a QC review of the design documents in accordance with the QC program.

5. Provide written comment responses to all comments received, including written responses for redline drawings.

Deliverables

1. Final, bid-ready design submittal package (plans, specifications, cost estimate, and probable project construction schedule)

2. Written responses to comments and redlines from the 95% review.

Assumptions
▪ Fire Alarm Design is not included in this scope of services. ▪ Bid period assistance, construction support services including RFI review/responses and submittal review/response are not included herein but can be provided for an additional fee if requested by the City. ▪ City to provide records of the existing facilities including drawings, reports, basis of design, geotechnical information, etc.
▪ Design will comply with the 2025 CBC and Public Works Standards. ▪ New PG&E service is not anticipated for this project as pump motor horsepower is not anticipated to increase as part of this project. ▪ City will assist in coordination efforts with the Putah South Canal Authority having jurisdiction for coordinating project improvements.
▪ Survey and project drawings will be provided on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
▪ Survey and project drawings will be related to the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 2, Epoch 2017.50.

Appendix A: Project Schedule
Schaaf & Wheeler
Appendix A: Project Schedule
Early and proactive coordination will drive the project’s success and the timeline overall.

S&W will plan to have a summary list of coordination items prepared for the City at the time of the kickoff meeting to expedite data coordination. Early coordination efforts with the adjacent Fire Station, City integration personnel, operators and the South Putah Canal Authority will also be critical in getting early buyoff on proposed project activities, particularly along the shared fenceline on the northern edge of the project. Timely reviews by the City will also be paramount in keeping project deliverables on schedule as much as feasible.

A detailed schedule broken down by task is included on the following page.

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Project Management and Coordination 195 days Mon 8/11/25 Fri 5/8/26 2 TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 15 days Mon 8/11/25 Fri 8/29/25 3 A. Kickoff Meeting 0 days Mon 8/11/25 Mon 8/11/25
4 B. Data Collection and Coordination 15 days Mon 8/11/25 Fri 8/29/25 5 TASK 2. SURVEYING AND SOIL CORROSIVITY TESTING 25 days Mon 9/1/25 Fri 10/3/25 6 A. Survey of Existing Pump Station Site and Utilities 25 days Mon 9/1/25 Fri 10/3/25 7 B. Soil Corrosivity Inspection and Report Preparation 25 days Mon 9/1/25 Fri 10/3/25 8 TASK 3. 35% DESIGN 50 days Mon 9/1/25 Fri 11/7/25
9 A. 35% Plans, Specifications and and Engineer's Estimate 35 days Mon 9/1/25 Fri 10/17/25 10 B. Cost Estimating 10 days Mon 10/6/25 Fri 10/17/25
11 C. QAQC 5 days Mon 10/13/25 Fri 10/17/25
12 D. City Review of 35% Plans 15 days Mon 10/20/25 Fri 11/7/25 13 E. 35% Review Meeting 0 days Fri 11/7/25 Fri 11/7/25 14 TASK 4. 65% DESIGN 55 days Mon 11/10/25 Fri 1/23/26
15 A. 65% Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate 40 days Mon 11/10/25 Fri 1/2/26 16 B. Cost Estimating 10 days Mon 12/22/25 Fri 1/2/26
17 C. QAQC 5 days Mon 12/29/25 Fri 1/2/26
18 D. City Review of 65% Plans 15 days Mon 1/5/26 Fri 1/23/26 19 E. 65% Review Meeting 0 days Fri 1/23/26 Fri 1/23/26 20 TASK 5. 95% DESIGN 55 days Mon 1/26/26 Fri 4/10/26
21 A. 95% Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate 40 days Mon 1/26/26 Fri 3/20/26 22 B. Cost Estimating 10 days Mon 3/9/26 Fri 3/20/26
23 C. QAQC 5 days Mon 3/16/26 Fri 3/20/26
24 D. City Review of 95% Plans 15 days Mon 3/23/26 Fri 4/10/26 25 E. 95% Review Meeting 0 days Fri 4/10/26 Fri 4/10/26 26 TASK 6. FINAL DESIGN 20 days Mon 4/13/26 Fri 5/8/26
27 A. Final Design Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate 20 days Mon 4/13/26 Fri 5/8/26 28 B. Final Cost Estimate 10 days Mon 4/27/26 Fri 5/8/26 29 C. QAQC 5 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 5/8/26
Project Management
Task 1
Kickoff Meeting
Data Collection
Task 2
Survey
Corrosion Inspection
Task 3
35% Design
Cost Estimating
QAQC
City Review of 35% Plans
35% Review Meeting
Task 4
65% Design
Cost Estimating
QAQC
City Review of 65% Plans
65% Review Meeting
Task 5
95% Design Preparation
Cost Estimating
QAQC
City Review of 95% Plans
95% Review Meeting
Task 6
Preparation of Final Signed Plans
Cost Estimating
QAQC
27 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 Aug '25 Sep '25 Oct '25 Nov '25 Dec '25 Jan '26 Feb '26 Mar '26 Apr '26 May '26 Jun '26 Jul '26 Aug '26 Se

Appendix B: Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Appendix B: Resumes

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE has more than 12 years of experience with hydraulic systems, urban water systems, groundwater hydraulics, open-channel hydraulics, water wells, and GIS applications to water resources. In addition, Larry has extensive knowledge in pump station design and assessment. Larry also has experience in floodplain hydraulics, mapping, CLOMR/LOMR applications, and floodplain impact assessments.

Selected Project Experience
Pump Stations
Redwood Shores SSPS 22
and 23
City of Redwood City
Paradise SSPS
Town of Corte Madera
Shoreline IPS Design
City of Mountain View
Wilson SDPS
City of Petaluma
PS1 and Soquel SDPS
City of Santa Cruz
599 Airpark SDPS
Kier & Wright/ Stockton
Mariposa N4 SDPS
Kier & Wright/ Stockton
Ferry Point Lift Station
City of Richmond
Kings Village Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Devcon
Vista Cove Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Sancerra/City of Vallejo
NEI Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
NEI Sanitary Sewer Pump
Station
Prologis
Duke Realty Stormwater
Pump Station
Kier & Wright
Napa Logistics Building 4
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Design
Kier & Wright
Sanchez Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright
Napa Logistics Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Design
City of American Canyon
Mountain View Shoreline
Sewer Pump Station
Improvements Design
City of Mountain View
Stanford Codiga Resource
Center Sewer Pump Station
Assessment
Stanford University
Stanford East Campus
Stormwater Pump Station
Stanford University
Stanford Lakehouse Pump
Station Design
Stanford University
Facebook MPK 21 Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/Facebook
Infomart Building B Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/Infomart Data
Centers
Stevenson Place Mid Pen
Storm Drain Pump Station
Design
Civil Engineering
Associates/City of Fremont
Wren Avenue / Cambridge
Place Stormwater Pump
Stations
RJA/City of Gilroy
CenterCal “The Veranda”
Stormwater and Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
Kier & Wright/City of Concord
Education
BSCE, California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis
Obispo
MSCE California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis
Obispo
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California 84183
Software
WaterCAD, StormCAD,
InfoWater, InfoSWMM,
AutoCAD, ArcGIS, FLO-
2D, EPANET, EPASWMM,

HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS,
HEC1, HEC2
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Senior Project Manager

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
DCT Industrial Stormwater
Pump Station
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
Santa Clara Square Phase 2
Stormwater Pump Stations
Preston Pipelines/City of
Santa Clara
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
& Trunk Alternative Study
City of Mountain View
Home Ranch Pump Station
Gippetti Pump Stations
RJA/City of Gilroy
Bass Lake Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Rehabilitation
CSA 2A and 2B, County of
Madera
Santa Clara Gateway Pump
Station Review (2 Pump
Stations)
Santa Clara
Watson Ranch Sewer Pump
Station
ECSC Corp.

Hydraulics and Hydrology

BART SVBII
VTA/Mott McDonald Wong
Main Street Flood Study
City of Milpitas
Ciolino Trash Capture Design
Mark Thomas/City of Morgan
Hill
New Horizons Hydrology
RJA/City of Morgan Hill
16720 Monterey Road Flood
Study
RAMCAM/City of Morgan Hill
Tarob Court Flood Study
True Life Company/City of
Milpitas
The Crossings at Monterey
Flood Study
Hanna Brunetti/City of
Morgan Hill
Rancho Vista Flood Study
VVH Consulting/City of San
Juan Bautista
Lower Penitencia Creek
Improvements Project
Wood Rogers/SCVWD
16770 Monterey Road Flood
Study
City of Morgan Hill
Laurel Creek Hydraulic
Modeling
City of Hillsdale
Centre Point Drive Flood
Analysis and FEMA
Applications
City of Milpitas
McCandless Drive Flood
Analysis and CLOMR
Appliation
City of Milpitas
KB Homes, Piper Drive
Floodplain Analysis and
FEMA Applications
City of Milpitas
Lennar Homes, 450
Montague Flood Analysis and
FEMA Applications
City of Milpitas
Saratoga Creek Trail
Hydraulics Impacts
City of Santa Clara
Upper Llagas Creek Flood
Protection Project
Santa Clara Valley Water
District
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Modeling
City of Belmont
Airport Flood Protection
Study
City of Livermore
San Tomas Aquino Creek
Flood Study
SCVWD
Permanente Creek and
McKelvey Park Pump Station
Mott MacDonald/SCVWD
Zone 7 Watershed Hydrology
and Hydraulics
Zone 7 Water Agency
Silicon Valley BART
Extension Phase II
Floodplain Analysis
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority
Silicon Valley BART
Extension Floodplain
Analysis
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority
Water Delivery Systems
Reservoir 2 Improvements
MCWD
Fontenay, Sequoia, Mt.

Roberta, and El Pueblo Tank
Improvements
SVWD
Communications Hill Phase 3

SJWC/HMH
Watson Ranch Newell
Booster Station
CBG/ City of American
Canyon
Geomax II Onsite Water
RJA/City of Milpitas
Geomax Onsite Water
RJA/City of Milpitas
Fairfield Onsite Water
RJA/City of Fairfield
Piercy Fire Flow Analysis
Kier & Wright/San Jose
Point Richmond Onsite Water
Analysis
RJA/City of Richmond
Memorex Fire Flow Analysis
HMH/Santa Clara
Evergreen Circle Onsite
Water Analysis
Kier & Wright/San Jose
4th and Grant Onsite Water
Analysis
Novato
Jones and Oak Onsite Water
Analysis
RJA/Walnut Creek
Springhill Suites Fire Flow
Analysis
RJA/Pleasanton

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Glen M. Anderson, PE has more than 18 years of experience in sanitary sewer systems, potable water, and stormwater planning, assessment and design as well as the construction support and management associated with those projects. Glen has completed work on several sanitary sewer main and trunk rehabilitation projects. He has worked on sanitary sewer pump station rehabilitation projects throughout California.

Additionally, Glen has performed condition assessments for more than 150 sanitary sewer and stormwater pump stations. Glen’s potable water experience projects include the assessment and rehabilitation of booster pump stations, design of water tanks and planning and design for potable water wells and pipelines. In addition to design, Glen has provided construction support and management services for a variety of projects, including wells, pipelines, storage tanks, pump stations, and generator installations.

Selected Project Experience
Water Delivery Systems
Irene Drive Water Main
Replacement
Contra Costa Water District
Curtner Road Booster Station
Rehabilitation
Alameda County Water
District
Oak and Jones Water
System Planning
Summerhill Homes
Water System Planning and
Design
Confidential Client
Country Club and Victoria
Water Booster Pump Stations
City of Petaluma
Cherry Creek Water Pump
Station
City of Hillsborough
Assessment of City Wells
City of Santa Clara
Water System Modeling and
Design
Great Oaks Water Company
Watkins Gate Well and
Pipeline Project
Marina Coast Water District
Well 34 Site Improvements
Marina Coast Water District
Shady Lane Water System
Improvement
San Jose Water Company
Stonegate Water Supply
Project
County of San Benito
San Jerardo Water System
Improvements
County of Monterey
Segunda Pump Station Pump
replacement
California American Water
El Torro Wells
California American Water
Valley Christian School Pump
Station Rehabilitation
Valley Christian School

Wastewater Systems
Lincoln St. SSPS and
Forcemain
City of Stockton
Oil/Water Separator
Inventory and Assessment
Port of Oakland
Gate 24 and Gate 26 Grease
Interceptor Design
Turner Construction
Pipeline Condition
Assessment and Compliance
Evaluation
Port of Oakland
Sanitary Sewer System
Assessment and Inventory
Port of Oakland
Sanitary Sewer System
Compliance Improvement
Design
Glen M. Anderson, PE
Vice President
Education
BSCE, Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
University of California,
Davis
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California C76720
Colorado 0065621
Certifications
Certified Pump System
Assessment Professional
NASSCO PACP, MACP, and
LACP Certified, Cert. No. U-
714-06021855
Affiliations
American Water Works
Association

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Port of Oakland
Crestmoor and Lomita Pump
Stations and Forcemain
City of San Bruno
City of San Mateo Basin 2/3
– Pump Station
Rehabilitations
Stantec/City of San Mateo
Lift Stations J, K, D, F, and W
City of Morgan Hill
PSQ Reserve Flow and URD
Project
East Bay Municipal Utility
District
Assessment and Engineering
for Sanitary Sewer Main
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Force Main Appurtenance
Projects ESDC
Ross Valley Sanitary District
Cabrillo Avenue Sewer Main
Abandonment and
Replacement
City of Santa Clara
South Trunk Sewer Relief
Line
City of San Mateo
Madera Lift Stations (11 Lift
Stations
County of Madera
Mariner’s Island No. 5 and
No. 6 Pump Station
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Repairs
City of Fontana
Pump Station Rehabilitations
City of Alameda
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station M
City of Morgan Hill
S. San Francisco Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station No. 8
Rehabilitation
City of S. San Francisco
City of San Mateo Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
Assessment
City of San Mateo
Morgan Hill Trunk Sewer No.
2 City of Morgan Hill
Stormwater Systems
Misc. Stormwater System
Improvements
City of San Carlos
East Bayshore and West
Bayshore Pump Stations
City of Palo Alto
MAR12,17, and 19 Large
Trash Capture Devices
Port of Oakland
Anza Pump Station
Rehabilitation
City of Pacifica
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 2
City of Sunnyvale
Rehabilitation of Failed 96”
Stormwater Corrugated Metal
Pipe
Town of Moraga
O’Connor Pump Station
Improvement Feasibility
Study and Design
City of East Palo Alto
Vista Bella Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Half Moon
Bay
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Citrix Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Santa Clara
Kier & Wright
Silviera Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Gilroy
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Sears Point Stormwater
Pump Stations Design, 2
Stations
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.

Marsten Pump Station
City of Burlingame
San Francisquito Creek
Stormwater Pump Station
City of Palo Alto
Blanco Drain Stormwater
Pump Station
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Hope Street Stormwater
Pump Station
City of San Jose
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 1
City of Sunnyvale

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Leif M. Coponen, PE has more than 20 years of experience in water, wastewater, and storm water systems engineering. He has designed cost-effective water supply and wastewater systems for public agencies and private developments across the Bay Area.

Leif regularly provides CEQA support for water and wastewater CIPs and public works projects. His project management skills and in-depth knowledge of the design and analysis of both new and rehabilitated potable water, stormwater, and sanitary sewage systems and pumping stations has always been a major factor for repeat clientele.

Leif is also skilled at preparing detailed plans and specifications for bidding and construction of infrastructure projects for public agencies and providing construction support services.

Selected Project Experience
Potable Water Planning and
Design
Old County Road Water Main
Improvements
Mid-Peninsula Water District
Leong Drive Water and
Sewer Main Improvements
City of Mountain View
Modeling, Sizing, and Design
of San Juan Oaks Water
System
Whitson Engineers
750 Moffett Boulevard –
Moffett Gateway Water
Supply Assessment
David J. Powers & City of
Mountain View
El Camino Hospital Campus
Project – Water Supply
Assessment
David J. Powers & City of
Mountain View
North Bayshore Specific Plan
– Water & Wastewater
System Planning
City of Mountain View
East Whisman Precise Plan
Water Supply Assessment
and UIS
David J. Powers/City of
Mountain View
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Support
City of Mountain View
Stanford Next GUP Water
Supply Assessment
Leland Stanford Junior
University
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Support
Marina Coast Water District
Reservation Road Pipeline
Project
Marina Coast Water District
Watkins Gate Well and
Pipeline Project
Marina Coast Water District
Well 34 Site Improvements
Marina Coast Water District
California Avenue Extension
Pipeline Project
Marina Coast Water District
Bayer Tank
Structural/Marina-Ord Inter-
Tie Project
Marina Coast Water District
Communications Hill Water
Distribution System
KB Home/San Jose Water
Company
Coyote Road Pump Station
Great Oaks Water Co.

East Palo Alto General Plan
Update
City of East Palo Alto
Service Area 3 Planning
Study
Soquel Creek Water District
Sanitary Sewer Planning and
Design
Belmont Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation Projects
Modeling
City of Belmont
Education
BSCE, Michigan
Technological University,
Michigan
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California C70139
Affiliations
American Water Works
Association
North American Society of
Trenchless Technology
Leif M. Coponen, PE
Vice President

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Shoreline Sewage Pump
Station Assessment and
Trunk Sewer Alignment
Study
City of Mountain View
Shoreline Sewage Pump
Station Improvements
City of Mountain View
Vallco Specific Plan Sewer
Study
David J. Powers &
Associates
South Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Relief Line Capital Project
City of San Mateo
Sanitary Sewer Master
Planning and Design Review
Marina Coast Water District
Aquatic Park, Mariner’s
Island #5 and #6 Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Rehab
City of San Mateo
Spreckels Subdivision
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Standard Pacific Homes
Mariner’s Island No.2
Sanitary Sewage Pump
Station Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
South San Francisco
Industrial Sewage Pumping
Stations No.3 and No.4
Rehabilitation
Wilsey Ham
Stormwater Pump Stations
Laurelwood Storm Drain
Pump Station Rehabilitation
City of Santa Clara
Westside Storm Drain Pump
Station Pump Replacement
Project
City of Santa Clara
Matadero Creek Pump
Station, Adobe Creek Pump
Station, Airport Pump Station
Improvements
City of Palo Alto
Coyote Point and Poplar
Avenue Stormwater Pump
Station Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Marsten Storm Drain Pump
Station
City of Burlingame
Commonwealth Pump
Stations Evaluation for
Design Build Project
Preston Pipelines
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No.1 Rehabilitation
City of Sunnyvale
San Francisquito Creek
Stormwater Pump Station
City of Palo Alto
Santa Rita Storm Water
Pump Station
Monterey County Flood
Control
Spreckels Subdivision
Stormwater Pump Station
Standard Pacific Homes
Recycled Water Systems
Vallco Specific Plan Recycled
Water Study
David J. Powers &
Associates
CSIP – Espinosa Booster
Pump Station Modifications &
System Assessments
MCWRA
Pico Power Plant Recycled
Water Distribution
Silicon Valley Power
Smurfit-Stone Recycled
Water Retrofit
City of Santa Clara
Intel Co. Recycled Water
Retrofit
City of Santa Clara
River and Stream
Enhancement
Glenwood Wetlands Repair
Ruggeri, Jensen, Azar &
Associates
Monterra Ranch Wetlands
Restoration and Hydraulic
Design
Denise Duffy & Associates
Southern California Wildfires
FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping
FEMA
Floodplain Management
Westside Basin Hydraulic
Analysis and Desilting
City of Santa Clara
Big Creek Floodplain
Analysis
UCSC
Storm Drain Master Plan
Update
City of Livermore
O’Neil Tide Gate
Reconstruction
City of San Mateo
Planning and Design
Storm Drain Master Plan
City of Carmel

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Brett F. Crews has over five years of experience in the assessment, design, and construction support of pump stations for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. He has successfully managed and completed several multidisciplinary water, sewer, and stormwater projects for public and private company clients throughout the Bay Area.

Brett is skilled in the preparation of detailed plans, specifications, and estimates for bidding and construction of pump stations, wells, tanks, pipelines, and generator installations for public agencies.

Brett is also experienced in providing CEQA support for public water and wastewater systems. He has provided lead modeling for analysis of capital improvement projects with respect to developments, precise plans, and master plans.

Selected Project Experience
Design & Construction
La Honda Corporation Yard
SSPS Improvements
Town of Hillsborough
Bowers Sewer Pump Station
Improvements
City of Santa Clara
Lincoln St Sewer Pump
Station Improvements
City of Stockton
Ferry Point Sewer Pump
Station Improvements
City of Richmond
Sanitary Sewer System
Compliance Improvement
Design
Port of Oakland
Utility Assessment and
Inventory
Port of Oakland
Trash Capture Improvements
Port of Oakland
60” Sewer Main Extension
City of Redwood City
Laurelwood Stormwater
Pump Station
City of Santa Clara
Canon Sewer Pump Station
Stege Sanitary District
Broadway Terrace I/I
Reduction Stormdrain
Improvements
City of Oakland
Curtner Road Booster Station
Rehabilitation
Alameda County Water
District
Country Club and Victoria
Water Booster Pump Stations
City of Petaluma
Kings Village Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Devcon Construction Inc.

Napa Logistics Sewer Pump
Station Replacement
Kier & Wright/City of
American Canyon
NEI Detention Basin Pump
Station
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
Planning and Modeling
CEQA Support Utility Impact
Studies
City of Mountain View
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Support
City of Mountain View
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Marina Coast Water District
CEQA Specific Plan Utility
Impact Study
City of East Palo Alto
Water Supply Assessment
City of Mountain View
Water Supply Assessment
City of Sunnyvale
Water Supply Assessment
City of East Palo Alto
Education
BSCE, California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo
Licenses
California Registered
Engineer #94676
Software
AutoCAD, ArcGIS,
InfoSWMM, InfoWater,
InfoWater Pro
Brett F. Crews, PE
Associate Engineer

Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Sandra Carroll has over four years of experience in planning, design, and construction support for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. She consistently acts as a project engineer and modeler assisting in assessments of existing wet utility systems as well as development of Capital Improvement Projects with respect to developments, precise plans, and master plans.

Sandra also regularly assists with development/construction reviews, C3 SWMP reviews and inspections, and CEQA support for private development projects in San Joaquin, San Mateo, and Santa Clara County.

Selected Project Experience
Potable Water Planning and
Design
Castroville Seawater
Intrusion Project Water
System Analysis
E2 Consulting Engineers/
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
LLNL Site 300 Zone 3 Water
System Improvement Design
and Modeling Support
Kier + Wright/ Lawrence
Livermore National
Laboratory
Sandia National Laboratories
Campus Water System
Modeling and Planning
Kier + Wright/ Sandia
National Laboratories
Jones and Oak Road Water
System Design
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar/
Summerhill Homes
Pump Station Design and
Assessment
Mariposa Industrial Park
SDPS – Design and
Construction Support
Kier + Wright/ City of
Stockton
Fairfield Industrial Center
SDPS
Kier + Wright
Redwood Tech SSPS
Kier + Wright
Facebook Dumbarton
Campus SDPS
Kier + Wright
Vista Cove SSPS
Sansara
CEQA Utility Impact Studies
Central Arquez Precise Plan
Ascent/City of Mountain View
Redwood Life Precise Plan
Raimi + Associates/City of
Redwood City
Redwood City Downtown
Central Plan
David J. Powers Inc/City of
Redwood City
CEQA Utility Impact Studies
and On-Call Sanitary Sewer
Modeling Support
City of Mountain View, City of
Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Planning and
Design
Sewer System Capacity
Confirmation – 388 Vintage
Park, Foster City
City of Foster City
CEQA Utility Impact Studies
and On-Call Sanitary Sewer
Modeling Support
City of Mountain View
Sources of Storm Water
Inflow into Sanitary System
Study
City of Sunnyvale
Development Review and
Management
Third Party C3 SWMP
Reviews and Inspections
Numerous Clients
Foster City on-call
Development Review and
Construction Review
City of Foster City
Foster City Water, Sewer,
and Storm Drain Standard
Detail Updates
City of Foster City

Education
BSCE, University of
California, Davis
Licenses
Engineer-in-Training 173398
Software
InfoWorks ICM, WaterCAD,
AutoCAD Civil 3D, ArcGIS
Pro
Sandra Carroll, EIT
Assistant Engineer

TJC and Associates, Inc. Jacqueline N. Arama, P.E.

Jacqueline N. Arama, P.E., PMP
Electrical Engineer
Experience
Jacqueline Arama is an electrical engineer and certified PMP (Project Management Professional®) with a wide variety of experience in I&C and electrical analysis and design. Her experience includes feasibility studies and electrical design for water and wastewater treatment plants and associated communication facilities. She has developed designs including electrical load and voltage drop calculations, equipment layouts, panel elevations, electrical plans, lighting, detailed control loop descriptions, and electrical power distribution, as well as remote monitoring and controls.

Ms. Arama is experienced at performing field verification of plant conditions and documentation, and with developing electrical models and performing power system analyses using SKM PowerTools
©. She is familiar with fiber-optic cable
allocation, electrical load studies, and P&ID layouts and development, including coordination with process engineers. Ms. Arama’s certification by the Project Management Institute as a PMP recognizes her extensive experience leading and directing cross-functional teams to deliver projects on schedule and within budget, delivering quality work products, and being responsible for all aspects of projects. Her specific experience includes the following:
 Shoreline Irrigation Pump Station Improvements; City of Mountain View, CA; Engineer of Record. Providing electrical and I&C engineering services to upgrade controls and replace equipment that has reached the end of its useful life at the pump station, which was built in the 1980s to meet irrigation needs of the Shoreline area. Electrical and I&C design elements include new PG&E service, switchboard and MCC; upsized variable frequency- driven pumps to replace existing pumps on soft starters, new conductors for new and existing equipment via intercepted conduits; and new control panel with upgraded PLC and remote communication to match the City’s SCADA standards. Work performed includes field investigations, development of a Basis of Design Report, and development of drawings and specifications.  PS D Stormwater Pump Station D, Component Upgrade Project; City of San Diego, CA, Project Electrical Lead. The City of San Diego Stormwater Pump Station D (PS D) facility conveys storm water to the San Diego River. The objective of the Project is to increase capacity to address potential flooding from anticipated more severe storm events. The design reflects the requirements for higher rated equipment to power the larger pumps as well as incorporate modern technology for increased safety and performance. The upgraded PS D final build-out will be based on seven, 1,250 hp pump motors and variable frequency drives operating at 4,160V.

Arc resistant switchgear and arc flash mitigation technologies are incorporated for improved safety. A 12 KV service will be provided by SDG&E with a City-owned step-down transformer providing the station’s 4,160V supply. The control system and SCADA design incorporates an expandable system architecture that will allow integration with other City stormwater facilities for a system wide SCADA implementation. Pump protection will be provided with vibration and temperature monitoring and incorporated into an advanced motor protection relay.
 Water Quality Research Facility; East Bay Municipal Utility District, Walnut Creek, CA; Project Engineer. Engineering services including alternatives analysis and design for a pilot plant to provide key testing results and design criteria for EBMUD treatment plant improvement projects.

Providing I&C and electrical infrastructure support for the pilot facility interfacing to the District’s existing Walnut Creek WTP systems. Pilot plant package elements were integrated together for facility overall functionality.

Education
BS, Electrical
Engineering;
University of CA,
Davis; 2012
Professional
Registration
Electrical: CA 21270
AZ 72627
NV 28370
Professional
Certification
Project Management
Professional®
Professional
Memberships
Institute of Electrical
and Electronics
Engineers
National Society of
Black Engineers
Project Management
Institute
Office Address
2300 Clayton Road
Suite 1450
Concord, CA 94520

TJC and Associates, Inc. Jacqueline N. Arama, P.E.

 Ferry Point Sewer Pump Station Improvements Project; City of Richmond, CA; TJCAA Project Manager. Electrical, instrumentation, and controls design for a replacement pump station. Field investigations, development of a Basis of Design Report, and development of drawings and specifications. Electrical design elements included new PG&E service, distribution, instrumentation, and control for three 23 hp pumps, new odor control system, new control panel, PLC, and remote communication to the City’s SCADA.  Pump Station Improvements; City of Oakland, CA; Project Engineer. Provided electrical and control system improvements for replacement of two wastewater pump stations and retrofits at four wastewater pump stations. The design included pedestal-style utility service entrance panels, standby generators, automatic transfer switches, pump control panels with RTU-based controllers, and instrumentation. Provided ESDC.  Coral Street Pump Station Relocation Project; Monterey One Water, Marina, CA:

Project Manager. M1W selected TJCAA to develop approaches to relocate critical electrical equipment at the Coral Street wastewater pump station to dry, higher ground. Specifically, M1W’s Coral Street Pump Station is located less than 40 feet from the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean, making this critical infrastructure vulnerable to rising sea levels and increased severity of storm surges. Electrical equipment failures make the station inoperable and create a risk of sewage spilling into the ocean’s Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and Pacific Grove Area of Special Biological Significance. In addition, the town of Pacific Grove and neighborhood stakeholders are particularly sensitive to the aesthetic impacts of the pump station infrastructure. The critical stakeholders selected a remote site located on the City of Pacific Grove Golf course located roughly 1300 ft away from the submersible pumps that will remain in the existing structure. The proposed location is presently under environmental review prior to developing a final project design scheme.
 WWTP Phase II Expansion; City of Brentwood, CA; Project Engineer. Electrical and I&C design services for expansion of a WWTP to 12.8 mgd. This project also includes process revisions and additions to activated sludge, aeration, sludge drying and handling, and disinfection facilities. Electrical design elements included replacing the existing 480 V main service with a new 21 kV primary distribution service and coordinating with PG&E to support the new processes. Control system work included replacing Modicon quantum PLCs with redundant pair Modicon M580 platforms. Providing ESDC.
 White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility, Electrical Improvements; City of Lodi, CA; Project Engineer. Designing upgrades to the electrical and plant-wide control system for the majority of plant processes. Project includes new medium-voltage (12 kV and 13.3 kV) distribution with new pad-mount distribution transformers, new 480 V main-tie-main source transfer switchgear, new main-tie-main MCCs, allocation of process load trains on split-bus MCCs, feasibility analysis, and final design for contingency standby power source. Control system upgrades included replacement of end-of-life Rockwell Automation PLC-5 platforms with new CompactLogix units in a highly distributed control topology and connection of new controllers with a new plant-wide, single-mode, fiber-optic network backbone and wireless access. TJCAA providing ESDC.

 Hypochlorite Building Replacement Project; Dublin San Ramon Services District; Pleasanton, CA; Engineer of Record. Providing electrical and I&C engineering services for the replacement of the sodium hypochlorite storage facility at the WWTP that has significant deterioration. The new hypochlorite facility consists of a covered open-air structure (canopy) with five storage tanks, and provision for one future tank. Specific elements of the project include a new power distribution panel, skid-mounted chemical metering pumps with integral VFDs, lighting, fire alarm system, and provision for interconnection into the future fiber-optic network backbone to be provided under the SCADA upgrades project. Control system upgrades include replacement of the Opto-22 RTU with new CompactLogix unit.

 Lift Station 7 and 8 Ventilation and Lighting System; City of Pleasanton, CA; Engineer of Record. Electrical and mechanical design of improvements to address inoperable ventilation, inadequate and/or inoperable lighting, corroded conduits, and inoperable gas monitoring systems. Provided condition assessment, recommendations for improvements, final design, bid-period services, and ESDC. Improvements included development of ventilation improvements to allow reduction of hazardous classification levels within each facility’s wet well (to Class I Division 2) and dry well (to Unclassified) as per the requirements of NFPA 820.

Provided ESDC.

TJC and Associates, Inc. Andrew F. Calma, EIT

Andrew F. Calma, EIT
Electrical Designer
Experience
Andrew Calma is an Electrical Designer working with our Instrumentation, Controls, and Electrical group. Mr. Calma has 10 years of electrical engineering design experience in refineries, oil and gas facilities, chemical facilities, food and beverage facilities, residential buildings, office buildings, commercial establishments, and airport buildings.

In support of our senior and staff engineers, he focuses on designing electrical and control systems; preparing electrical load calculations; developing single line diagrams; developing design layouts for conduit, circuiting, and lighting plans; preparing conduit schedules; preparing engineering calculations used for equipment sizing and specifications; and developing engineer’s opinion of probable costs. His specific experience includes the following:
 Hypochlorite Building Replacement Project; Dublin San Ramon Services District; Pleasanton, CA; Electrical Designer. Providing electrical and I&C engineering services for the replacement of the sodium hypochlorite storage facility at the WWTP that has significant deterioration.

The new hypochlorite facility consists of a covered open-air structure (canopy) with five storage tanks, and provision for one future tank. Specific elements of the project include a new power distribution panel, skid- mounted chemical metering pumps with integral VFDs, lighting, fire alarm system, and provision for interconnection into the future fiber-optic network backbone to be provided under the SCADA upgrades project. Control system upgrades include replacement of the Opto-22 RTU with new CompactLogix unit.

 Shoreline Irrigation Pump Station Improvements; City of Mountain View, CA; Electrical Designer. Providing electrical and I&C engineering services to upgrade controls and replace equipment that has reached the end of its useful life at the pump station, which was built in the 1980s to meet irrigation needs of the Shoreline area. Electrical and I&C design elements include new PG&E service, switchboard and MCC; upsized variable frequency-driven pumps to replace existing pumps on soft starters, new conductors for new and existing equipment via intercepted conduits; and new control panel with upgraded PLC and remote communication to match the City’s SCADA standards. Work performed includes field investigations, development of a Basis of Design Report, and development of drawings and specifications.
 Monterey and Seaside Pump Stations Upgrade Project; Monterey One Water, Marina, CA; Electrical Designer. Electrical design for replacement of 480 Volt electrical equipment, including power distribution, motor control centers, switchgear, variable frequency drives, and controls at the Monterey and Seaside Pump Stations. Electrical design for replacement of two 1,200 kW standby generators for the Seaside pump station and a portable generator connection at the Monterey Pump Station.
 Aeration Diffuser System Replacement Design; City of Lodi, CA; Electrical Designer. The project included the replacement of aeration diffusers and associated piping, and valve replacement following a condition assessment and Basis of Design Report addressing various deficiencies with the aeration process at the City’s White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility. Electrical and I&C components of the project included new dissolved oxygen probes (furnished and installed by the City), aeration control valves, air flow meters, and integration of the existing PLC hardware in the design.

TJCAA also supported the process engineer in preparation of the process control narratives for the new aeration system and in preparing the electrical component specifications for the bid package. TJCAA is providing ESDC.

Education
BS, Electrical
Engineering;
University of the East;
Manila, Philippines;
2008
Professional
Certification
Engineer In Training,
CA
Office Address
2300 Clayton Road
Suite 1450
Concord, CA 94520

TJC and Associates, Inc. Andrew F. Calma, EIT

 Santa Anita Booster Pump Station Upgrades, Pasadena Water and Power, Pasadena, CA; Project Manager. Comprehensive evaluation of electrical and instrumentation and control systems to verify existing conditions and document rehabilitation or replacement recommendations. Components evaluated included motor control center, pump motors, and electrical service from San Diego Gas and Electric.
 Eagle Rock Pump Station Upgrades Conceptual Design, Pasadena Water and Power, Pasadena, CA; Project Manager. Evaluation of electrical and instrumentation and control elements for a 100-year-old pump station, including pump motors, MCC, and electrical service.
 Water Treatment Facility Communications Room Improvements, Contra Costa Water District, Oakley, CA; Electrical Designer. Design of improvements to protect server and communication network equipment by enhancing temperature controls and reducing impacts of dust in the room.
 WTP Filter Improvements and Hypochlorite Conversion, City of Pittsburg, CA; Electrical Designer. This $47 million WTP filter and chemical systems modernization project incorporated replacing aged electrical infrastructure, replacing filtration system, migrating to new chemical processes and updates to existing pump stations. Developed P&IDs and specifications to maintain the plant in operation throughout the estimated 3.5-year construction period. I&C design incorporated a new distributed PLC architecture coordinated with construction phasing and replacement processes. Providing ESDC.  Rinconada WTP Reliability Improvement Project; Valley Water, Los Gatos, CA; Electrical Designer. Electrical engineering and control systems design work for a $180 million WTP modernization. This project incorporates capacity increases to raise plant output to 100 mgd and incorporates new ozone treatment trains, multiple new and retrofitted chemical systems, filters, and floc-sed basins. The design was developed to maintain the plant in operation throughout the estimated 5-year construction period. Design included new 12 kV distribution, arc flash protection strategies, a new 3 MW diesel standby generator, and new distributed motor control centers with smart motor starters and VFD equipment. I&C design incorporated a new distributed PLC architecture, using six process area-based, hot-standby PLC pairs coordinated with construction phasing and new processes. Final design included over 400 electrical, instrumentation, and controls design drawings. Providing engineering services during construction.

 Foothill Pump Station Rehabilitation Project; Stanford University Sustainability and Energy Management, Utilities Division, Civil Infrastructure Group; Electrical Designer. Electrical engineering design and technical assistance for new electrical distribution, new variable speed drives, lighting, modified electrical utility service, and other electrical infrastructure improvements to address outdated mechanical, electrical, control equipment. Design included new SCADA/RTU system based on Stanford’s XIO cloud-based SCADA/telemetry to be integrated with the University’s SCADA Central and communications infrastructure. Providing ESDC.
 Arc Flash Study; Alameda County Water District; 84 Sites in CA; Electrical Designer.

Providing an arc flash hazard analysis for treatment plants, well fields, water production plants, booster stations, distribution and diversion facilities, tanks/reservoirs, regulator stations, and cathodic protection stations. The 84 sites included in this study vary in age, size, and complexity and have electrical distribution ranging from 240 to 2,400 V. Site reconnaissance, SKM PowerTools© modeling for each site, and analysis of existing equipment ratings, protection, device coordination, and arc flash levels.

Making recommendations for
equipment upgrades and protective device settings to improve coordination and/or reduce arc flash energy and establish documentation. Project work also includes preparation and assistance with installation of arc flash labels by District staff to achieve compliance with NFPA 70E.

“Protecting the infrastructure through innovative
Corrosion Engineering Solutions”

SUMMARY

Over thirty-nine (39) years of experience in all phases of corrosion projects including design engineering, manufacturing, research and development, construction inspection services, construction management, sales and marketing and litigation expert witness. Have successfully worked with clients in the fields of aerospace, marine, petroleum, chemical, mining and minerals, water and wastewater treatment and transmission, electric power industry, transportation systems, municipalities and state and federal government agencies. Established a proven track record for the ability to manage and direct complex research and design projects, requiring the coordination of strict budgets and demanding schedules with engineering staff and project teams.

Special areas of expertise include cathodic protection design, installation, monitoring, troubleshooting, surveying, adjusting and repairing for underground pipelines, pile supported structures, seawalls, retaining structures, marine vessels, storage tanks, condenser water boxes, cooling water lines, intake structures, traveling screens and water wells. Additional expertise in the diagnosis of internal and external corrosion problems associated with copper piping systems such as thermogalvanic corrosion, high temperature corrosion, velocity related corrosion and corrosion related to cold water pitting phenomena, failure analysis of building plumbing systems, conducting soil corrosivity studies, expert witness for litigation support.

PUBLICATIONS & SEMINARS

► Ali, M. & Howard Jr., J.D. Corrosion Investigation of Steel H -Piles. NACE Corrosion Conference 1990.
► California State Water Resources Control Board, Seminars throughout state, “ Corrosion and Corrosion Control for Underground Storage Tanks”, 1994-1995. ► Cal/Nev Section of AWWA, Fall Conference, 1994 -1995, “Corrosion Control for Water Wells”.
► San Francisco Bay Area NACE Conference, August, 1996, “ Corrosion Concerns of the Water Industry”.
► California Water Environment Association, Northern Regional Conference, Sept., 1996, “Metal Selection and Corrosion Control for Water and Soil Environments ”. ► American Society of Civil Engineers, Bay Area Geotechnical Committee, April 1999, “Guidelines for Soil Corrosivity Testing and Laboratory Analysis ”. ► East Bay Engineers Society, Fairfield, CA, Spring 2004 “ What All Civil Engineers Should Know About Corrosion and Corrosion Control”.
► NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “How to Conduct an Evaluation of Asbestos-Cement Pipe”.
► NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “Case Study of Prestressed Precast Concrete Pile Failures”.

EDUCATION

Bachelor of Science –
Civil/Structural Engineering,
University of Florida
1977

MBA Courses (2 years) -
Northern Illinois University

REGISTRATIONS

► Registered Professional Civil Engineer, CA
(C44435)
► Registered Professional Corrosion
Engineer, CA (CR1055)
► Registered Professional Civil Engineer, NV
(019295)
► Registered Professional Engineer, IL
(inactive)

EXPERIENCE

President/Owner
JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc.

Concord, CA
1995 – Present

District Manager
Corrpro Companies
Hayward, CA
1992 – 1995

President
Corrosion Engineering & Research Co.

Concord, CA
1987 – 1992

Design/Project Engineer
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
Oakbrook, IL & San Francisco, CA
1977 – 1985

Mark P. Andrilla, P.E., P.L.S.
1804 Soscol Avenue, Suite 202, Napa, CA
T:(707) 690-9025 F: (707) 542-2106 C: (707) 363- 1936

PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Licensed Professional Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor with the State of California with 35 years of experience in civil engineering project management and design, land surveying, and associated technologies, all from the municipal government perspective. His land surveying experience includes responsibility for boundary surveys, topographic surveys, and construction surveys.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Plant Overflow Basin, Vallejo, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed a boundary survey and Record of Survey of the District’s Plant Overflow Basin parcel and an adjoining parcel in preparation of a land transaction between the District and the City of Vallejo. Mr. Andrilla also prepared legal descriptions and exhibits in support of the transaction.

Vallejo Flood & Wastewater District Plant Control and
Topographic Survey. Vallejo, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed a horizontal and vertical control survey to establish permanent control points within the District’s plant site. The survey was also used to perform topographic mapping of select areas of the plant as well as a photogrammetric survey of the plant site.

Record of Survey, Blair Park, Piedmont, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed a survey of a 1,100-foot portion of the south line of a public park along Moraga Avenue in the City of Piedmont. The work included retracements of deeds and subdivision block resolutions based on documents dating to the 1920s.

Skibbereen Lane, Vallejo, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed a boundary and topographic survey of Skibbereen Lane for the purpose of siting a new sanitary sewer and storm drain easement in favor of the Vallejo Flood & Wastewater District through a privately-owned street. The work also included the filing of a Record of Survey with Solano County.

Sears Point Sewer Pump Station Settlement Monitoring, Vallejo, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed settlement monitoring over a nine-month period at the Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District’s Sears Point Pump Station to determine if ground settlement was continuing to affect structures and aboveground piping at the facility.

Lincoln Avenue Rehabilitation, Napa, CA. Mr. Andrilla performed a topographic survey of a 8,300-foot long segment of Lincoln Avenue, a major arterial in the City of Napa. The work also included five major signalized intersections. The project was tied to the new City Survey Control Network and the prior Record of Survey of Lincoln Avenue (both developed by C&P). The survey was challenging due to the heavy vehicle traffic on Lincoln.

TITLE
Managing Project
Surveyor

ROLE
Project Manager

EXPERIENCE
35 Years

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science
Degree, Civil
Engineering (1989)
UC Irvine
Irvine, California
Master of Science
Degree, Civil
Engineering
(Construction
Engineering and
Management) (1999)
Stanford
University
Stanford,
California

LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer,
Civil, California, C 51317
Professional Land
Surveyor , California, PLS
8985

PROFESSIONAL

MEMBERSHIPS
California Land
Surveyors Association

4 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “B”

PAYMENT

1) The total contract price for services rendered by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed $340,530.

2) Payment shall be made to CONSULTANT in accordance w ith the CONSULTANT’S price proposal as accepted by the City, and CONSULTANT sh all submit monthly invoices to the CITY for the same.
3) Any additional meetings or work required beyond tha t set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be mutually agreed to in writing by the CITY and CONSU LTANT, and shall be billed on a time and materials basis to the City of Fairfield.

Hourly Charge Rate Schedule

Personnel Charges
Charges for personnel engaged in professional and/or technical work are based on the actual hours directly chargeable to the project.

Current rates by classification are listed below:

Classification Rate/Hr
Principal Project Manager $305
Senior Project Manager $280
Senior Engineer $255
Associate Engineer $225
Assistant Engineer $205
Junior Engineer $190
Designer $180
GIS Analyst $180
Technician $165
Engineering Trainee $140
Litigation Charges
Court or deposition time as an expert witness is charged at $ 500 per hour.

Materials and Services
Subcontractors, special equipment, outside reproduction, data processing, computer services, etc., will be charged at 1.10 times cost.

Effective 1/1/25

Schaaf & Wheeler

CONSULT ING CIVIL ENGINEERS
4699 Old Ironsides Dr., Suite 350
Santa Clara, CA 95054-1860
408-246-4848

EXHIBIT B

5 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “C”

GENERAL PROVISIONS
1) INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. At all times during the t erm of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of CITY. CITY shall have the right to control CONSULTANT only insofar as the results of C ONSULTANT's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, CITY shall not have the right t o control the means by which CONSULTANT accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. 2) LICENSES; PERMITS; ETC. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice CONSULTANT's profession. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, kee p in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, and approvals whi ch are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice his profession.
3) TIME. CONSULTANT shall devote such services pursua nt to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance o f CONSULTANT's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall adhere to the Schedule of Activities as described in their Executive Summary.
4) CONSULTANT NOT AN AGENT. Except as CITY may specify in writing, CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.

CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement, to bind CITY to any obligation whatsoever.
5) ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
6) PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that CITY , in its sole discretion, at any time during the te rm of this Agreement, desires the removal of any person o r persons assigned by CONSULTANT to perform services pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT sha ll remove any such person immediately upon receiving notice from CITY of the desire of CITY for the removal of such person or persons. 7) STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement. Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged in the geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices his profession. All products which CONSULTANT delivers to CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a workmanlik e manner, and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in CONSULTANT's profession. CITY shall be the sole judge as to whether the product of the CONSULTANT is satisfactory.
8) CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be canceled at any time by the CITY at its discretion upon written notification to CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT is entitled to receive full payment for all services performed and all costs incurred u p to and including the date of receipt of written n otice

6 Revised 1/09/2025
to cease work on the project. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to no further compensation for work performed after the date of receipt of written noti ce to cease work. All completed and incomplete products up to the date of receipt of written notice to cease work shall become the property of CITY. 9) PRODUCTS OF CONSULTING. All products of the CONSUL TANT provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the CITY.
10) INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS.
a) If AGREEMENT is an agreement for design professional services subject to California Civil Code § 2782.8(a) and CONSULTANT is a design profess ional, as defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c)(2), to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and designated volunteers (collectively “CITY Indemnitees”) from and against any and all cl aims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTA NT. CONSULTANT’s duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by CITY in direct proportion to the CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault. CONSULTANT’s percentage of fau lt shall be determined, as applicable, by a court o f law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, lia bility or damage is incurred by way of settlement o r resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator havi ng made a determination of the CONSULTANT’s percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the CITY.
b) If AGREEMENT is not an agreement for design professional services subject to California Civil Code § 2782.8(a) or CONSULTANT is not a desig n professional as defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c)(2), to the fullest extent allowed by la w, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY Indemnitees from all claims, suit s, or actions of every name, kind and description, brought forth on account of injuries to or death of any person or damage to property arising from or connected with the willful misconduct, negligent ac ts, errors or omissions, ultra-hazardous activities , activities giving rise to strict liability, or defe cts in design by CONSULTANT or any person directly or indirectly employed by or acting as agent for CONSU LTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including the concurrent or successive passive negligence of the CITY Indemnitees.

It is understood that the duty of CONSULTANT to ind emnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code.

Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve CONSULTANT from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any such damages or claims for damages.

CONSULTANT’S responsibility for such defense and in demnity shall survive termination or completion of this agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. 11) PROHIBITED INTERESTS. No employee of the CITY shal l have any direct financial interest in this agreement. This agreement shall be voidable at the option of the CITY if this provision is violated.

7 Revised 1/09/2025
12) LOCAL EMPLOYMENT POLICY. The CITY desires wherever possible, to hire qualified local residents to work on city projects. Local resident is defined as a person who resides in Solano Count y.

The CITY encourages an active affirmative action program on the part of its contractors, consultants, and developers. When local projects require, subcontra ctors, contractors, consultants and developers will solicit proposals from qualified local firms where possible.

As a way of responding to the provisions of the Dav is-Bacon Act and this program, contractor, consultants, and developers will be asked, to provi de no more frequently than monthly, a report which lists the employee's name, job class, hours worked, salary paid, city of residence, and ethnic origin. 13) CONSULTANT NOT A PUBLIC OFFICIAL. CONSULTANT is not a "public official" for purposes of Government Code §§ 87200 et seq. CONSULTANT conducts research and arrives at his or her conclusions, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of t he control and direction of the CITY or any CITY official, other than normal contract monitoring. I n addition, CONSULTANT possesses no authority with respect to any CITY decision beyond these conclusions, advice, recommendation, or counsel. 14) EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORTING REQUIRE MENTS. When the CITY executes an agreement for or makes payment to CONSULTANT in the amount of $600 (six hundred dollars) or more in any one calendar year, CONSULTANT shall provide the following information to CITY to comply with Employment Development Department (EDD) reporting requirements:
a) Whether CONSULTANT is doing business as a sole prop rietorship, partnership, limited liability partnership, corporation, limited liabili ty corporation, non-profit corporation or other for m of organization.
b) If CONSULTANT is doing business as a sole proprietorship, CONSULTANT shall provide the full name, address and social security number of the sole proprietor. c) If CONSULTANT is doing business as other than a sole proprietorship, CONSULTANT shall provide CONSULTANT’S federal tax identification number.

8 Revised 1/09/2025
EXHIBIT “D”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, or employees. 1) MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMITS OF INSURANCE
a) Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form CG 00 01) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, per sonal injury, products and completed operations, an d property damage. If Commercial General Liability o r other form with a general aggregate limit is used , either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability coverage (Form CA 00 01 with C ode 1 – any auto) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. c) Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employers’ Liability insurance, each in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 2) INDUSTRY SPECIFIC COVERAGES
If checked below, the following insurance is also required.

Professional Liability Insurance / Errors and Omissions Liability in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence.

Pollution Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence Garage Keepers Insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence Fidelity / Crime / Dishonesty Bond in the minimum amount of $____________ MCS-90 Endorsement to Business Automobile insurance for transportation of hazardous materials and pollutants
Builder’s Risk / Course of Construction Insurance in the minimum amount of $__________.

3) INSURANCE PROVISIONS
a) DEDUCTIBLES AND SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS. Any deduc tibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the op tion of the CITY, either the insurer shall reduce o r eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the CONSULTANT shall procure a b ond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. b) The general and automobile liability policies (and if applicable, pollution liability, garage keepers X

9 Revised 1/09/2025
liability and builder’s risk policies) are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
i) The CITY, its officers, officials, employees and vo lunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of work or operati ons performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT; products and completed operations of th e CONSULTANT; premises owned, occupied or used by the CONSULTANT; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the CONSULTANT. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. ii) For any claims related to this project, the CONSULTANT’S insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the CONSULTANT’S insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to th e CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
iv) The CONSULTANT’S insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. v) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the CITY.
vi) The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated above shall not serve to reduce the C ONSULTANT’S policy limits of coverage.

Therefore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement, or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured, whichever is greater. c) ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURER. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the CITY.

VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE. CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit D. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf; on forms eq uivalent to CG 20 10 11 85, subject to CITY approva l; and submitted electronically via email at [email protected] . All insurance certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. At the request of the CITY, CONSULTANT shall provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, includin g endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. d) SUB-CONTRACTORS. CONSULTANT shall require all subc ontractors to procure and maintain insurance policies subject to the requirements of Exhibit D. Failure of CONSULTANT to verify existence of sub- contractor’s insurance shall not relieve CONSULTANT from any claim arising from sub-contractors work on behalf of CONSULTANT.

Agenda Item No: K.4

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025 -150 PW Solano Express Intercity Transit Funding and Cost - Sharing Agreement

Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Solano Express Intercity Transit Funding and Cost - Sharing Agreement By and Among the Solano Transportation Authority, the County of Solano, Solano County Transit, the City of Dixon, the City of Fairfield, the City of Suisun City, and the City of Vacaville

Funding Source: $537,074; Transportation Development Act Funding

Contact: Melissa Minton, (707) 434-3804

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The proposed resolution authorizes the city manager to enter into a funding and cost -sharing agreement between the Solano Transportation Authority (STA), the County of Solano , Solano County Transit (SolTrans), the City of Dixon, the City of Fairfield, the City of Suisun City, and the City of Vacaville for intercity Solano Express services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026.

DISCUSSION
Solano Express provides intercity and inter -regional bus services that connect Solano County cities along the I-80 corridor to the University of California Davis, and the El Cerrito del Norte and Walnut Creek BART stations. As these routes provide transit services for residents throughout Solano County, participating cities and the county jointly fund Solano Express services through a funding and cost-sharing agreement.

Each contributing jurisdiction’s portion of the operating costs for the five Solano Express routes is determined annually using a cost -sharing formula recommended by the Intercity Transit

Funding Working Group (ITFWG), which is comprised of representatives from the STA, Solano County, and each participating city, and facilitated by the STA.

The cost-sharing formula is primarily based on two key factors: Solano Express ridership by residence and population data. Based on the cost-sharing formula, the City’s contribution for FY 2025-2026 is $537,074. In accordance with the conditions of th e funding and cost -sharing agreement, contributions for future fiscal years shall require formal approval by the STA Board by May of each year and will subsequently be brought to City Council for approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City’s contribution under the proposed funding and cost-sharing agreement for FY 2025-2026 is $537,074, which will be paid using Transportation Development Act funds . These funds are identified for transit purposes and will have no impact on the General Fund.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
The STA Board approved the funding and cost -sharing agreement during its regular meeting on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose not to authorize the execution of the funding and cost -sharing agreement. This is not recommended, however, as doing so would constitute a breach to the last intercity funding agreement approved by Resolution No. 2012 -281, which requires that a jurisdiction provide a year’s notice to opt out of the funding agreement.

COORDINATED WITH
Solano Transportation Authority

STAFF CONTACT
Melissa Minton, Transportation Planner
(707) 434-3804
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: Proposed Funding Agreement

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-150

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SOLANO EXPRESS INTERCITY TRANSIT

FUNDING AND COST-SHARING AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE SOLANO TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY, THE COUNTY OF SOLANO, SOLANO COUNTY TRANSIT, THE CITY OF DIXON, THE

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY, AND THE CITY OF VACAVILLE

WHEREAS, Solano Express provides intercity and inter -regional bus services connecting cities within Solano County to UC Davis and the El Cerrito del Norte and Walnut Creek BART stations; and

WHEREAS, the Solano Transportation Authority (STA) has sponsored, and other jurisdictions have joined, the Intercity Transit Funding Working Group (ITFWG) to facilitate shared funding of Solano Express transit services; and

WHEREAS, the Intercity Transit Funding Working Group ( ITFWG) has negotiated a new Intercity Transit Funding and Cost-Sharing Agreement for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The city manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the funding and cost- sharing agreement, under which the City of Fairfield will contribute $537,074 in Transportation Development Act funding.

Section 2. The city manager, director of public works, the transpo rtation manager, or designee is hereby authorized to do all things necessary to implement the above-mentioned agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

1 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

INTERCITY TRANSIT FUNDING AND COST SHARING AGREEMENT
(SOLANO EXPRESS) BY AND AMONG

THE SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE COUNTY OF SOLANO,

THE SOLANO COUNTY TRANSIT, THE CITY OF DIXON, THE CITY OF

FAIRFIELD, THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY, AND

THE CITY OF VACAVILLE
THIS AGREEMENT(“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this 1st day of July, 2025, by and among the SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a joint powers entity organized under Government Code section 6500 et seq., and the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) and the County Transportation Authority (CTA) for Solano County, hereinafter referred to as “STA”, and the governmental entities in Solano County providing intercity transit services to the citizens of Solano County: to wit:

THE COUNTY OF SOLANO (“County”), a political subdivision of the State of California; SOLANO COUNTY TRANSIT (“SolTrans”), a joint powers entity organized under Government Code section 6500 et seq.; and FOUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (“Cities”) in Solano County:

The City of Dixon,
The City of Fairfield,
The City of Suisun City, and
The City of Vacaville
Unless specifically identified, the various public agencies herein may be commonly referred to as the “Parties” or “County, City, and Cities” or “Jurisdictions· or “Intercity Transit Operators” as the context may require.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, STA is authorized by Public Utilities Code § 180152 to enter into agreements to provide public transport services and has historically exercised that authority with respect to intercity transit routes and paratransit services; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement establishes certain goals and principles for Intercity Transit Activities in Solano County; and
WHEREAS, the provision of transit services throughout Solano County has been developed on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis and, as a result, the provision of intercity transit services to the citizens of Solano County may be enhanced by the improved coordination of transit routes and other issues among the transit providers. Further, funding of transit services is a complex process which has been partially remedied by coordination of certain transit funds (including Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds, State Transit Assistance Funds (STAF), Regional Measure 2 and Regional Measure 3 ) through the STA for approval by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC); and

2 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final WHEREAS, STA has sponsored, and the County and Cities have joined and participated in, the Intercity Transit Funding Working Group (“ITFWG”) which is comprised of representatives that are Parties to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, STA’s I -80/I-680/I-780 Transit Corridor Study completed in 2004 identified seven intercity bus routes in Solano County, all of which are subsidized by more than one jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to a cost -sharing methodology and funding for these routes beginning in 2006; and
WHEREAS, in 2018 STA finalized the Intercity Corridor Study (Solano Express) and approved the transition from seven (7) routes to four (4) color system: Blue, Green, Red, and Yellow; and WHEREAS, STA’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for Solano County plans, directs, and prioritizes the transportation needs of Solano County , and incorporates various STA studies and plans into a 25-year planning document, and the Solano CTP 2040 was completed in June 2020; and
WHEREAS, STA, Solano County, the incorporated cities in Solano County providing transit services (Dixon, Fairfield, Suisun City, and Vacaville), and SolTrans have previously commenced, and have agreed to fund, express transit services as part of this Intercity Tran sit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement including express route transit service provided by SolTrans between Vallejo, Benicia and Walnut Creek BART station and return (collectively, “SERVICES”). The Solano Express routes are defined as the Yellow Line serving Vallejo, Benicia, Concord, and Walnut Creek BART; the Red Line serving Fairfield, Suisun City, Vallejo, and El Cerrito del Norte BART, which was expanded to include servicing San Francisco under Route 82; the Green Line serving Fairfield, Suisun City, and El Cerrito del Norte BART; and the Blue Line serving the I -80 corridor from UC Davis to Walnut Cr eek BART, serving the communities of UC Davis, Dixon, Vacaville, Fairfield, and Benicia , and a matrix of presently existing Intercity Transit Routes and the service areas covered by this Agreement is outlined in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, STA’s coordination of the annual multi-agency TDA matrix, the STAF project funding for the county, Regional Measure 2 (RM 2), and Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) funding has clarified and simplified the funding claims process locally and regionally; and WHEREAS, continuing to have a coordinated multi-year, multi -agency funding strategy with predictability and some flexibility would help to continue to stabilize intercity transit service funding in Solano County; and
WHEREAS, the Solano County Intercity Transit Operators and other funding partners participated in the aforementioned ITFWG which has, since its inception, met at least annually to review and refine data and funding formula, and to develop core concepts to guide the coordination and funding of intercity transit operations in the future.

3 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, STA, the County, SolTrans (representing the cities of Benicia and Vallejo) and the Cities of Dixon, Fairfield, Suisun City, and Vacaville in consideration of the mutual promises herein, agree as follows:

Part I
Transit Coordination and Guiding Principles
Principle 1:

To provide certainty to Intercity Transit Operators and funding partners, and to establish a consistent method and an agreement for sharing subsidies for all intercity transit routes by Solano Intercity Transit Operators based on a consensus of the participating jurisdictions.

Principle 2:

To focus limited financial resources and deliver productive, connective, and reliable intercity transit service and to develop a cost effective and affordable intercity route structure that will:
1) be implemented with the agreed upon subsidy sharing agreement; 2) meet the policy/coverage requirements agreed upon; and 3) be marketed jointly.

Principle 3:

To develop strategies to consistently evaluate, modify, and market intercity transit services with the implementation of this Agreement.

Principle 4:

To comply with all local, state, and federal rules and regulations, including Title VI.

Part II
Service Plan Review
In 2006, the Parties initially developed a set of criteria for evaluating intercity transit routes and service plans in order to provide consistency of analysis and a comprehensive, common, and uniform methodology for such evaluations:

1. Service Productivity Measures:
• Passengers per revenue hour.
• Passengers per trip.
• Passengers per revenue mile.

2. Cost Efficiency Measures:
• Cost per vehicle revenue hour.
• Cost per vehicle revenue mile.

3. Cost Effectiveness Measures:
• Cost per passenger trip.
• Farebox Recovery Ratio.

4 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

4. Policy/Coverage Requirements:
• Provides connectivity between cities.
• Provides regional transit connections.
• Meets unmet transit needs.
• Minimize stops in each city.
• Is user friendly.

The Solano Express Performance Benchmarks were initially developed in fiscal year (FY) 2012- 13 and updated in October 2016 in order to better monitor and evaluate the consolidated seven routes system into initially a four-route system and with the addition of Route 82 now a five-route system known as Solano Express and will specify the metrics and performance standards against which actual performance of the Intercity Routes will be measured.

Part Ill
Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement
A. Included Intercity Transit Routes/ Intercity Transit Route Definition To be included in this Agreement, a route must meet all five of the following criteria:

1. Operates between two cities; and

2. Has a monthly ridership of at least 2,000; and

3. Operates at least five (5) days per week; and

4. Has been operating for at least a year and is not scheduled for deletion within the fiscal year; and

5. Maintains service that meets at least one of the performance standards identified in the Coordinated Short Range Transit Plan ( SRTP) with regards to service productivity , cost efficiency, and cost effectiveness.

B. Baseline Cost Data Source
Annually each Intercity Transit Operator shall prepare a baseline cost estimate. The baseline cost estimate for the fiscal year shall be based on the Intercity Transit Operators’ preliminary budget for that fiscal year prepared in the Spring preceding the start of the fiscal year. The preliminary budget estimate shall include unit cost or line-item cost escalation (as appropriate), cost changes due to service changes (e.g., changes to service hours), changes due to contract changes and estimates of allocated overhead costs by mode. The preliminary budget estimate shall include a comparison to the most recent audited year’s actual expenses and revenues, and estimated budget vs. actual expenses and revenues for the preceding and any unaudited fiscal years.

The baseline cost estimate shall be submitted with the Intercity Transit Operators’ completed three variable cost allocation model that includes an estimate of fares by route and other subsidies by route. Sources for other subsidies shall be identified in the cost allocation model or by another means to make clear the amounts and sources of other subsidies.

C. Mid-Year Budget or Cost Changes
Each Intercity Transit Operator shall report to the ITFWG and Solano Express Intercity

5 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final Transit Consortium (“Transit Consortium”) variances from the planned/budgeted costs and revenues for each intercity transit route no later than February 1 st of each year. Budget variances and changes in subsidy requirements shall be considered by the ITFWG and Transit Consortium.

D. Baseline Data Definitions
The definitions for revenue service miles, and revenue service hours as used for the cost allocation model shall follow the definitions provided by the National Transit Database (NTD) and shall be consistent with the NTD data reported by the Intercity Transit Operators. In the event that routes are interlined, peak vehicles shall be allocated by the proportion of the peak period operated by each intercity transit bus. In any case, the total peak vehicles used in the cost allocation model shall not exceed the total peak fleet reported in NTD.

E. Cost Allocation Model
The ITFWG has agreed to use a three variable cost model for allocating intercity transit costs by route. This model is based on the NTD’s recommended approach for allocating transit costs by vehicle hours , and vehicle miles. The ITFWG uses this model to assign intercity transit costs by route. The results of the cost model form the basis for allocating subsidies to each jurisdiction. Each Intercity Transit Operator shall input data into the model and the models shall be submitted to STA and each jurisdiction for further use and review.

F. Net Costs to be Shared
The net cost of each intercity transit route is the total cost of the route minus farebox revenue, RM 2 and RM 3 funds, STAF, FTA, and other non-TDA operating funds that are applied to the route.

G. Ridership Survey Data
On-board ridership surveys have been taken periodically since 2006 to provide the ITFWG with data regarding the number of riders by jurisdiction of residence by intercity route. This data is assembled for use in establishing the cost sharing formula set forth in this Agreement.

The on-board survey will be conducted periodically and no less frequently than every three (3) years by STA for purposes of updating the ridership information in this Agreement. The last Solano Express Ridership Survey was completed during the Spring of 2022 and subsequently adopted by the STA Board in October 2022. The Ridership Survey update was completed as scheduled for 2024 and will be provided to the ITFWG in preparation for fiscal year 2025-26. The next Ridership Survey will be scheduled in 2026.

H. Population Data
City and County Unincorporated population data for Solano County shall be obtained from the most current publication of the State of California Department of Finance E-4 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties and State. This information shall be updated and incorporated into this Agreement’s cost sharing formula annually.

6 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final I. Intercity Transit Cost Sharing Formula
Intercity transit costs shall be shared among the jurisdictions based upon an agreed upon formula whereby the net cost of each route is further reduced by the County Unincorporated Area’s agreed upon proportionate share for each route, up to an agreed upon maximum for the County share. The County share is negotiated annually and is based on either the proportion of the County’s population share of the net subsidy required, or by increasing the prior year County share by the Consumer Price Index. The resulting net cost is shared twenty percent (20%) by population share and 80% by ridership by jurisdiction of residence. The subsidy amounts provided by each jurisdiction will be included in the annual TDA matrix prepared by STA and submitted to MTC.

J. Cost Estimates and Actual Costs -- Year End Reconciliation The baseline cost information used in the cost allocation model is based on preliminary budget information for the next fiscal year. As such, the costs are estimates only and are subject to change.

1. After annual audited financial statements are presented to and/or approved by the Intercity Transit Operators ’ governing body, transit operator staff will update the data in the Cost Allocation Model (“CAM”) for the audited fiscal year. Updated actual cost , revenue (fares and other revenue), hours, miles, and peak vehicle data shall be included in the cost allocation model, consistent with the data reported to NTD.

2. Using results of the CAM populated with actual audited data, STA will recalculate the subsidy shares owed by each jurisdiction for the fiscal year and compare the amounts to the amounts paid according to the cost sharing formula in the Agreement.

3. Differences between the planned/budgeted subsidies included in the Agreement and the actual subsidy requirements based on audited data will be identified and a “true-up” will be performed. Subsidy surpluses (overpayments by a jurisdiction for its formula share of intercity transit services) and deficits (underpayments by a jurisdiction for its formula share of intercity transit services) will be applied to the subsequent year’s amount due for intercity transit services. Based on the availability of audited data after the close of a fiscal year, there will be a two-year lag for applying actual results for a given fiscal year to the subsidy shares for the upcoming budget year. That is, reconciliation for Year 1 (for example, Fiscal Year 2023-24) will be applied to the subsidy shares due for Year 3 (for example, Fiscal Year 2025- 26). The Parties intend to begin this reconciliation process with FY 2022 -23, which will inform the amount to be contributed by each Party in FY 2024-25.

K. Application of the Intercity Transit Cost Sharing Formula The Intercity Transit Operator shall provide the actual mid-year cost for the current fiscal year and the estimated cost for the forthcoming fiscal year no later than March 15th. The intercity transit cost sharing formula shall be calculated and the results presented to the ITFWG, Transit Consortium, and Technical Advisory Committee ( “TAC”) no later than April annually, unless a different date is agreed-to by the parties to this Agreement . The results of these calculations are shown in Attachment A to this Agreement. Attachment A shall be modified administratively and recommendation of the ITFWG will be presented to the Transit

7 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final Consortium and TAC for consideration and approved by a vote of the STA Board no later than May each year.

L. Reporting
The Intercity Transit Operators shall report at least quarterly to the STA and ITFWG the following information by intercity route in accordance with the established benchmarks:
• Budget vs. actual cost for the quarter;
• Budget vs. actual cost per revenue service hour for the quarter; • Budget vs. actual fares for the quarter;
• Ridership;
• Service hours;
• Missed trips by route;
• Missed stops by route;
• Service design;
• Service productivity;
• Cost efficiency; and
• Cost effectiveness.

M. Role and Responsibility of the ITFWG
Recognizing that seven of eight local jurisdictions within Solano County participate in funding intercity transit routes, all proposed fare and service changes shall be presented by the Intercity Transit Operators to the ITFWG, Transit Consortium, TAC and approved by the STA Board at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to implementation and in sufficient time for the ITFWG’s consideration. All participating jurisdictions are responsible for participating in the ITFWG and for meeting their financial obligations under this Agreement.

Part IV
General Terms and Conditions

1. Term of Agreement
This Agreement is effective as of the date written above and shall continue through fiscal year 2025-26, with an option to renew, unless it is terminated or modified in writing with approval by the STA Board and a majority of the other signatories representing a majority of the population of Solano County.

2. Method for Claims
All funding claims for TDA, STAF, or RM 2 and RM 3 funds for intercity transit services identified under this Agreement shall be made by the eligible Parties to MTC and shall be consistent with the annual funding matrix prepared by STA in coordination with the Parties.

As required under current policy, TDA claims must be approved by the STA Paratransit Coordinating Council (PCC), Transit Consortium, TAC, and STA Board prior to approval by MTC.

8 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

3. Independent Contractors
STA shall perform this Agreement as an independent contractor. STA shall, at its own risk and expense, determine the method and manner by which duties imposed on STA by this Agreement shall be performed; provided however that the County and Cities may monitor the work performed by STA. For projects or studies undertaken pursuant to this Agreement by the County or any of the Cities, said County or City shall perform this Agreement as an independent contractor. Said County or City shall, at its own risk and expense, determine the method and manner by which duties imposed on them by this Agreement shall be performed; provided however, that the other Parties may monitor the work performed by said County or City.

4. Transit Services
STA contracts with Intercity Transit Operators to provide any and all labor, equipment, tools, fuel, material, management, data management, financial services, and operations services related to and necessary for implementation and operation of said SERVICES upon the terms and conditions set forth. Intercity Transit Operators shall provide the SERVICES pursuant to the provisions set forth in the attached exhibits which are incorporated into this Agreement as though set forth in full:

Exhibit A: (Scope of Services)
Exhibit B: (Routes, Schedule and Fares for Service)
Exhibit C: (Performance Measures)

5. Indemnification
The Parties and STA shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other and their respective officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors from any claim, loss or liability, including, without limitation, those for personal injury (including death) or damage to property, arising out of or connected with any aspect of the performance by any of the Parties or STA, or their respective officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of activities required under this Agreement, and any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by the staff attorneys or contract attorneys of the Party(ies) to be indemnified, and any and all costs, fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision.

6. Insurance
During the term of this Agreement, Intercity Transit Operators shall ensure their contractor maintains insurance coverage and lists STA and SolTrans as additional insured at least as broad as:
▪ Commercial General Liability Insurance
▪ Automobile Liability Insurance
▪ Workers’ Compensation insurance
Minimum Limits of Insurance:
(1) General Liability:
(Including operations,
$10,000,000
per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury, and property damage.

If Commercial General Liability
insurance or other form with a general

9 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final products and completed
operations.)
aggregate limit is used, either the
general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the
general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $10,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Workers’ Compensation: As required by the State of California.

The endorsements should be on forms provided by the STA or on other than the STA’s forms, provided those endorsements or policies conform to the requirements stated in this clause. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the STA. STA reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting coverage required by these specifications.

7. Termination
Any individual Party may terminate this Agreement at the end of the fiscal year for the future fiscal year upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Parties. Request for termination of the Agreement is to come from the policy board of the agency requesting termination of their participation in the Agreement.

8. Authority of STA
STA, following consultation with Parties, shall decide all questions which may arise as to the quality or acceptability of work performed and as to the manner of performance of the work performed and all questions as to the acceptable fulfillment of this Agreement on the part of Parties.

STA reserves the ri ght to assign its responsibilities under Agreement to a successor governmental entity for the provision of the public transportation services herein addressed.

Unless otherwise agreed, such assignment shall constitute a complete novation between STA and Parties and receipt by Parties from STA of sums then due and payable for services rendered pursuant to Agreement prior to assignment shall constitute a complete accord and satisfaction as between STA and Parties.

9. No Waiver
The waiver by any Party of any breach or violation of any requirement of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any such breach in the future, or of the breach of any other requirement of this Agreement.

10 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

10. Notices
All notices required or authorized by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, by e-mail, or by deposit in the United States mail, by certified mail, postage prepaid, return- receipt requested. Any mailed notice, demand , request, consent, approval, or communication that a Party desires to give to the other P arties shall be addressed to the other Parties at the addresses set forth below. A Party may change its address by notifying the other Parties of the change of address. Any notice sent by mail in the manner prescribed by this paragraph shall be deemed to have been received on the date noted on the return receipt or five (5) days following the date of deposit, whichever is earlier.

CITY OF DIXON
Louren Kotow
Public Works Director
600 East A Street
Dixon, CA 945620
[email protected]

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
Sanjay Mishra
Public Works Director
1000 Webster Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
[email protected]

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
Nouae Vue
Public Works Director
701 Civic Center Boulevard
Suisun City, CA 94585
[email protected]

CITY OF VACAVILLE
Brian McLean
Public Works Director
650 Merchant Street
Vacaville, CA 95688
[email protected]

COUNTY OF SOLANO
Matt Tuggle
Engineering Manager
675 Texas Street, Suite 5500
Fairfield, CA 94533
[email protected]

SOLANO COUNTY TRANSIT
Beth Kranda
Executive Director
311 Sacramento Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
[email protected]

SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Daryl K. Halls
Executive Director
423 Main Street
Suisun City, CA 94585
[email protected]

11. Subcontracts
Within the funds allocated to the Parties under this Agreement. All Parties are hereby given the authority to contract for any and all of the tasks necessary to undertake the projects or studies contemplated by this Agreement.

12. Amendment/Modification
Except as specifically provided herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended only in writing and with the prior written consent of STA and the Parties.

11 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

13. Interpretation
Each Party has reviewed this Agreement, and any question of doubtful interpretation shall not be resolved by any rule or interpretation providing for interpretation against the drafting Party.

This Agreement shall be construed as if all Parties drafted it. The headings used herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. The terms of the Agreement are set out in the text under the headings. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

14. Disputes and Dispute Resolution
If a dispute should arise between some or all of the P arties to this Agreement relative to the performance and/or enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, the dispute shall first be considered by the ITFWG. A recommended resolution based on the deliberations of the ITFWG will be presented to the Transit Consortium and TAC for their consideration. Final resolution of disputes will be determined by the STA Board of Directors following consideration of the Transit Consortium and TAC.

15. STA’s Remedies on Breach
It is understood and agreed that in the event the Intercity Transit Operators do not perform the SERVICES in the manner required by the terms of this Agreement, then, in addition to all other remedies, penalties and damages provided by law, STA may provide such SERVICES and deduct the cost of doing so from the fund sources contemplated by this Agreement, including TDA amounts or historical funding shares claimed, due, or to become due to the Intercity Transit Operators.

16. Status of Parties
Parties shall be independent contractors and neither Parties nor any of its employees, agents or volunteers shall be employees of STA for any purpose related to thi s Agreement. This Agreement is by and between independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or any type of association between and among the Parties.

17. Permits to Operate
At its sole cost and expense, Intercity Transit Operators shall obtain any and all permits, licenses, certifications, or entitlements to operate as are now or hereafter required by the State of California or any federal agency to enable Intercity Transit Operators to perform the SERVICES, and shall provide copies of all such entitlements to STA when received by Intercity Transit Operators. STA and Intercity Transit Operators shall cooperate and share equally in the cost and expense and process for obtaining any and all permits, licenses, certifications or entitlements required by any local agency for the provision of the SERVICES.

18. Severability
If any provision of this Agreement, or any portion thereof is found by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, such provision shall be severable and shall not in any way impair the enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

12 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

19. Local Law Compliance
The P arties shall observe and comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and Codes.

20. Non-Discrimination Clause
a) During the performance of this Agreement , the Parties and their subcontractors shall not deny the benefits thereof to any person on the basis of race, religion , color, ethnic group identification, national origin , ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, age, sex or sexual orientation, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race , religion, color, ethnic group identification, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap , mental disability, medical condition, marital status, age, sex or sexual orientation. STA shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. b) The Parties shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Ac t (Government Code section 12900. et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Title 2.

California Code of Regulations. section 7285.0, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter I, Part I, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (sections 11135-1139.5) and any state or local regulations adopted to implement any of the foregoing as such statutes and regulations may be amended from time to time.

21. Force Majeure
Parties shall not be held responsible for/losses, delays, failure to perform, or excess co sts caused by unforeseeable events beyond the control of Parties. Such events may include, but are not restricted to, the following: Acts of God, fire, epidemics, pandemic, quarantine, stay- at-home or shelter in place orders and unforeseen modification to those orders, earthquake, flood, or other natural disaster; riots, strike, war, and unavailability of fuel.

If the performance of this Agreement, or of any obligations hereunder, is prevented, restricted or interfered with by reason of natural disaster, war, civil disturbance, labor dispute or other cause beyond Parties’ reasonable control, Parties, upon giving prompt notice to STA, shall be excused from such performance on a day-to-day basis to the extent of such prevention, restriction, or interference and STA shall likewise be excused from performance of its obligations on a day-for-day basis where performance is so prevented, restricted or interfered with; provided that STA and Parties shall each use its best efforts to avoid or remove such causes of nonperformance and both parties shall proceed to perform with dispatch whenever such causes are removed or cease. In th e event of a delaying condition having more than ninety (90) days duration, the non-delaying party or parties may terminate this Agreement.

22. Audit
a) Parties shall permit the authorized representatives of STA, the MTC, the State of California, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and/or the Comptroller General of the United States to inspect and audit all data and records of the Parties relating to performance under this Agreement.
b) Parties agree to accept responsibility for receiving and replying to and/or complying with

13 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final the audit exceptions by appropriate STA, Solano County, State of Ca lifornia, or federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Agreement.

23. Financial Records/Separate Records
Intercity Transit Operators shall maintain accurate and complete books, records, data, and documents on generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with Uniform System of Accounts and records adopted by the State Controller pursuant to section 99243 of the Public Utilities Code and as required by MTC. Such records shall be kept in such detail and form to meet applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

A complete and separate se t of books, accounts, and/o r records shall be maintained by Intercity Transit Operators, which records shall show details of transactions pertaining to the management, maintenance, and operation of this service under the terms of this Agreement.

Intercity Transit Operators’ records shall be kept with sufficient detail to constitute an audit trail to verify that any and all costs charged to the system created by this Agreement are in fact due to operations pursuant in this Agreement and not due to other operations by Intercity Transit Operators.

24. Access to Records
STA, the MTC, any other agency responsible for funding or oversight of this operation, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Intercity Transit Operators which are directly pertinent to this Agreement, for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions of Intercity Transit Operators ’ files. Intercity Transit Operators shall maintain all these records for a period of at least four (4) years following contract closeout to allow for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions of Intercity Transit Operators’ files.

25. Conflict of Interest
The Parties hereby covenant that they presently have no interest not disclosed, and shall no t acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its obligations hereunder, except for such conflicts that the Parties may consent to in writing prior to the acquisition by a Party of such conflict.

26. Entirety of Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all previous agreements, promises, representations, understandings and negotiations, whether written or oral, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
[signatures on the next page]

14 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the Parties hereto as of the date first above written.

CITY OF DIXON
By: ______________________________
Jim Lindley, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
City Attorney

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
By: ______________________________
David Gassaway, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
City Attorney

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
By: ______________________________
Bret Prebula, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
City Attorney

CITY OF VACAVILLE
By: ______________________________
Savita Chaudry, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
City Attorney

COUNTY OF SOLANO
By: ______________________________
Bill Emlen, County Administrator

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
County Counsel

SOLANO COUNTY TRANSIT (SOLTRANS)
By: ______________________________
Beth Kranda, Executive Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
SolTrans Legal Counsel

SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (STA)
By: ______________________________
Daryl K. Halls, Executive Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________
STA Legal Counsel

15 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

ATTACHMENT A

INTERCITY TRANSIT FUNDING AND COST SHARING AGREEMENT
FY 2024-25 COST SHARING FORMULA CALCULATION

A. Included Intercity Transit Routes
The following intercity transit routes meet the definition and criteria described in Part III(A) of the Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement and thereby are qualified to be included in the cost sharing formula for FY 2024-25:

Transit Operator RT Dixon Fairfield SolTrans Suisun City Vacaville County SolTrans Blue Line x x x x x
SolTrans Green Line x x x
SolTrans Yellow Line x x
SolTrans Red Line x x x x
SolTrans Rt. 82 x x x

B. Cost Allocation Models
Cost allocation models provided by SolTrans used in the calculation of intercity cost shares will follow the definitions included in the Agreement.

C. Ridership Survey Data
Ridership Survey data collected in 2022 was used as input to the FY 2023-24 intercity cost sharing calculations. Ridership Survey dated collected in 2024 will be used as input to the FY 2025 -26 intercity cost sharing calculations.

D. County Share
The County agreed upon share for FY 2024-25 is based on the prior year share increased by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the previous year. CPI data for this calculation is based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Urban Consumers, San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose Urban Area. The maximum County share used in calculating the FY 2024-25 intercity cost sharing amounts will be $198,776.

E. FY 2024-25 Intercity Cost Sharing Formula Results
The Fiscal Year 202 4-25 Solano Express Intercity Operating Budge t and Cost Sharing Plan was approved by the STA Board on July 10, 2024, which is outlined below:

16 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

F. Annual Update to the Intercity Transit Cost Sharing Formula Calculation This attachment shall be modified administratively and shall be presented by the Intercity Transit Operators to the ITFWG, Transit Consortium, TAC and approved by the STA Board each year.

17 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

EXHIBIT A

BLUE LINE, GREEN LINE, YELLOW LINE, RED LINE, AND ROUTE 82

SCOPE OF WORK

I. SERVICES
A. Operations Generally
Intercity Transit Operators shall provide turnkey express route transportation services in compliance with the requirements outlined in this Scope of Work, the Routes and Schedule for the Services included as Exhibit B.

B. Personnel Generally
Intercity Transit Operators shall provide all administrative, operations, and maintenance personnel necessary to responsibly operate the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 of the Solano Express Transit system, including any required on-board security or supervision.

C. Items provided by Intercity Transit Operators

1. Intercity Transit Operators shall provide computer hardware and software necessary for dispatch, maintenance, administration, recordkeeping, on-board infrastructure, and reports required to operate the service, including a fully functioning automatic vehicle locator (AVL) and automatic passenger counts (APC) once certified, used to operate and dispatch the system, and a mechanism to communicate timely and accurate service information to passengers.

2. Intercity Transit Operators shall provide all facilities, buses, tools, equipment, fuel, oil, ti res, batteries, parts, cleaning supplies, office supplies, office equipment and such other items or materials required to professionally operate, maintain, and administer the Service.

3. Intercity Transit Operators shall provide:
i. All tools and equipment t o perform the preventive maintenance inspection and repair activities required in this Scope of Work.
ii. All tools and equipment necessary to perform, periodic service and adjustments and make mechanical repairs.
iii. All cleaning equipment and supplies necessary to clean th e buses and maintain equipment in accordance with this Scope of Work.

II. INTERCITY TRANSIT OPERATORS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Intercity Transit Operators shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and shall conform to all instructions and make all corrections required by the CHP, other applicable regulatory agencies regarding the use and maintenance of buses and overall operations of the service.

18 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final III. REPORTS; RECORDS; INSPECTIONS BY STA
A. Operating Reports: Each quarter, Intercity Transit Operators shall collect and after validation, submit by the twenty-fifth (25th) day of the following month to the STA operating, financial and user data for the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82.

The format of Intercity Transit Operators ’ reports shall be mutually agreed to by STA and Intercity Transit Operators. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. Reports submitted on a Quarterly basis:
a) Budget versus actual report for operating expenses, breakdown of actual fare revenue, actual cost, actual revenue hours, actual ridership, and fare box recovery ratio.
b) On-time performance by route.
c) Ridership by route, day, trip, and fare collection method and amount. d) Total revenue recorded from data reporting subsystem. e) Missed trips by route (partially or fully).
f) Summary log of all complaints whether valid or not.
g) Summary of Accident Reports (separated by collision/non-collision and preventable/non-preventable).
h) Summary of operational problems, if any, including a critique and evaluation of the system and the service, trends on vehicle reliability and maintenance costs and recommended corrective action(s) where appropriate.

2. Other Reports:

a) CHP Safety Compliance Reports - Submitted to STA a nnually after CHP submits said report(s) to Intercity Transit Operators.

B. On-Board Survey: STA shall fund, and Intercity Transit Operators shall help coordinate the conducting of ridership surveys in accordance with regulatory guidelines as set forth by the MTC requiring agencies to prepare an SRTP and furnish the data to STA.

The Intercity Transit Operator s shall cooperate to conduct boarding surveys on the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 summarizing and reporting to the STA boarding activity by stop, and trip. STA may conduct other surveys during the term of this Agreement. These surveys will determine matters such as socioeconomic, ridership patterns and fare-type characteristics of system users. Intercity Transit Operators shall cooperate in the conduct of these surveys including having its in-service drivers and supervisory personnel participate, where operationally possible, at no additional charge to STA.

C. State/Federal Reporting: Intercity Transit Operators shall prepar e and file a ll reports required by State and Federal authorities, to include as necessary those required by the California Transportation Development Act of 1971 and FTA’s National Transit Database. Intercity Transit Operators shall collect data required for TDA, State Controllers Report, NTD, and all other data required by funding and regulatory agencies and provide a copy of these reports to STA upon completion.

19 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final D. Data: Intercity Transit Operators agrees that all information required to be furnished by thi s Agreement shall be free from proprietary restrictions. Intercity Transit Operators further agrees that all such data is public and in the public domain.

E. Financial R ecords/Separate Record s: Intercity Transit Operators shall maint ain accurate and complete books, records, data and documents on generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with Uniform System of Accounts and records adopted by the State Controller pursuant to section 99243 of the Public Utilities Code and as required by MTC.

Such records shall be kept in such detail and form to meet applicable local, state and federal requirements.

A complete and separate set of books, accounts, and/or records shall be maintained by Intercity Transit Operators, which records shall show details of transactions pertaining to the management, maintenance, and operation of this service under the terms of this Agreement.

Intercity Transit Operators’ records shall be kept with sufficient detail to constitute an audit trail to verify that any and all costs charged to the system created by this Agreement are in fact due to operations pursuant in this Agreement and not due to other operations by Intercity Transit Operators.

F. Record Access: STA, MTC, any other agency responsible for funding or oversight of this operation, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Intercity Transit Operators which are directly pertinent to this Agreement, for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions of Intercity Transit Operators ’ files. Intercity Transit Operators shall maintain all these records for a period of at least four (4) years following contract closeout to allow for audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions of Intercity Transit Operators’ files.

IV. TELEPHONE INFORMATION SERVICE
A. Intercity Transit Operators shall provide telephone customer information service to the public during regular business hours, Monday through Sunday. Intercity Transit Operators will ensure STA has up-to-date information on the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 to ensure customer service provided by STA is accurate.

B. Intercity Transit Operators and STA shall also mutually establish processes and standards for responses to requests for service, complaints, and inquiries.

V. ROUTE, SCHEDULE, SERVICE AREAS
Intercity Transit Operators shall provide service in compliance with the bus routes, schedule, service a rea, and holidays d escribed in Exhibit B to this Agreement or any amendments thereto, providing service on schedule in a safe, professional, and courteous manner. Changes to vehicle revenue hours and bus stops shall be presented to the ITFWG, Transit Consortium, and TAC for consideration, and approved by the STA Board prior to implementation.

20 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final VI. COMMUNITY RELATIONS; USE OF BUS FOR COMMUNITY RELATIONS;

ADDITIONAL STA SERVICES
Intercity Transit Operators shall undertake the community outreach program to sustain and maintain good rapport with the public, including but not limited to: 1) printing and distributing the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 schedules in a timely manner and maintaining an adequate supply to the STA for outreach and customer service; 2) maintaining the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Lin e, and Route 82 schedules online and ensuring changes are made in a timely manner; 3) consulting with the STA on special outreach activities to promote Solano Express; and 4) schedules and marketing materials will include Solano Express logo. STA agrees to pay $45,000 for fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 exclusively for Solano Express marketing. Solano Express marketing f unding is contingent upon compliance with the above tasks one through four.

Pursuant to the STA ’s JPA, STA shall undertake countywide transportation planning, programming transportation funds, managing and providing transportation programs and services, delivering transportation projects, and setting transportation priorities. STA will provide Solano Mobility Commuter Information services to Intercity Transit Operators in support of the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82. Solano Mobility services will include personalized assistance for traveling within and beyond Solano County as well as community outreach, incentive programs, individual commute ass istance, and emergency ride home and emergency ride programs. STA’s Solano Mobility program staff will provide general marketing service for the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 throughout Solano County and in coordination with agencies outside Solano County. The Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 will be promoted and marketed with available funding and grants. STA will pursue available and appropriate funding opportunities for replacement of the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 vehicles and for marketing of the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 service. STA will distribute the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 Comment Cards to the operators for display on all their intercity buses for passenger ’s feedback, compile feedback received, and distribute to Intercity Transit Operators.

STA will be responsible for development of a funding plan for the operation of the Blue Line, Green Line, Yellow Line, Red Line, and Route 82 as part of the update of the Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement, which covers the operating costs for Solano Express routes given in each fiscal year, in partnership with Intercity Transit Operators and the other Parties in the Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement.

21 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

EXHIBIT B

LATEST ROUTE SCHEDULE AND THE LATEST FARE SCHEDULE FOR THE BLUE LINE, GREEN LINE, YELLOW LINE, RED LINE, AND ROUTE 82

ADOPTED BY STA AND SOLTRANS

Solano Express Fare Table

Fare Type
Trips
Within
Solano
County
(Blue,
Green,
Red, and
Yellow}
Trips Outside Solano
County (Blue, Green,
Red, and Yellow,
Route 82

Adult $2.75 $5.00 $6.00
Youth $2.00 $4.00 $5.00
Reduced $1.35 $2.50 $3.00
31 Day Passes
Adult $70.00 $114.00 1 Pass Swipe +
Upcharge
SOM/Reduced $35.00 $57.00

Adult $5.50 $10.00
Youth $4.00 $8.00
SOM/Reduced $2.75 $5.00 $5.00

22 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

23 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

24 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

25 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

26 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

27 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

28 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

29 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

30 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

31 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

32 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

33 Intercity Transit Funding and Cost Sharing Agreement updated 06 -17-25.Final

EXHIBIT C PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Solano Express Performance Benchmarks for Fiscal Year 2024-25

Measures FY 2024-25
SERVICE DESIGN Benchmark
Speed - MPH 35
SERVICE PROD UCTIVITY Benchmark
Passengers per Vehicle Revenue Hour 25.0
Passengers per Trip 15.0
Capacity Utilization 35.00%
COST EFFICIENCY Benchmark
Cost per Vehicle Revenue Hour $230.07
Cost per Vehicle Revenue Mile $3.87
COST EFFECTIVENESS Benchmark
Subsidy per Passenger Trip $3.71
Farebox Recovery Ratio 20%

Agenda Item No: K.5

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council

FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager

SUBJECT: Resolution 2025 -151 PW Funding Agreement for Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant New Entrance Project

Approving a Funding Agreement between the City of Fairfield and Suisun-Solano Water Authority for the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant Improvements and Manuel Campos Parkway Extension Phase 2 Project, and Authorizing an Update to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget

Funding Source: N/A

Contact: Ryan Panganiban, (707) 428-7017

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
On April 15, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-56, which authorized the award of a construction contract to Ghilotti Bros. Inc., (Ghilotti Bros.) to complete access and frontage improvements to the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant leased to and operated by the Suisun- Solano Water Authority (SSWA). These improvements are being completed in conjunction with the road-widening occurring along Manuel Campos Parkway. The attached resolution provides for SSWA’s reimbursement of the costs for this work to the city.

DISCUSSION
In 2016, the City and Solano Irrigation District (SID) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing the framework for constructing the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant New Entryway ( CPW070123). SID owns, and SSWA leases and operates the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant. Completion of the Project is a pr erequisite for the planned widening of Manuel Campos Parkway eastward to Clay Bank Road.

In 2022, the City and SSWA agreed that it would be beneficial if the City performed the work.

Over the past several years, the City and SSWA staff have collaborated on the design, permitting,

and bid phases for the project. A preconstruction meeting with Ghilotti Bros. was held on June 24, and construction is scheduled to begin in mid -July, with completion anticipated by winter 2025.

Pursuant to the 2016 MOU and the contract with Ghilotti Bros., the Project will receive $411,859 from SSWA. Additional City contributions identified in the funding agreement include a $10,000 payment to SSWA for electric gate improvements previously completed by SSWA, as outlined in the MOU. The MOU also commits the City to reimbursing SSWA for additional on -site pond grading work, up to a maximum of $55,680 —the bid amount for the work. This reimbursement will be provided once the work is completed and documented, with SSWA having up to t hree years to complete the grading.

As with any construction project, field modifications may necessitate adjustments to the contract amount. To ensure timely reimbursement from SSWA, City staff recommends authorizing amendments to the funding agreement , which includes the Ghilotti Bros. contract amount of $991,401.72 plus a 15% contingency ($148,710.11). The total full construction authorization will be $1,140,110.83. The proposed resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute the funding agreement between the City and SSWA for the Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
A total of $346,178 in SSWA reimbursements will be received for the Project (CPW070123) and deposited in the Capital Streets Fund (Fund 252) . The reimbursed amount of $ 346,178, representing the SSWA’s share of the total Project cost ($411,859) less than the incidental costs identified in the funding agreement ($10,000 for an electric gate and $55,680 for pond grading).

This will require a budget adjustment of $346,178 to change the funding source, which was previously funded with AB1600 Streets Fund ( $115,381; Fund 261) and Northeast District ($230,797; Fund 290) to SSWA reimbursement. This funding will offset a portion of Fairfield’s local contribution and allow the City to utilize local funding on other capital improvements.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
The funding agreement was approved at the June 9, 2025, SSWA Board Meeting.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
If the council has any questions, this request may be delayed so that staff can provide the necessary information later.

COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney

STAFF CONTACT
Ryan Panganiban Assistant Public Works Director and City Engineer (707) 428-7017
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution
Attachment 3: Proposed Agreement

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-151

APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN-SOLANO

WATER AUTHORITY FOR THE CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AND MANUEL CAMPOS PARKWAY EXTENSION PHASE 2 PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING AN UPDATE TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 BUDGET

WHEREAS, the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant New Entryway Project (Project) is required for the City to continue the Manuel Campos Road Widening Project; and

WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Understanding between the City, Solano Irrigation District (SID) , and Suisun-Solano Water Authority (SSWA) was executed and describes the scope of work and parties' cost share for constructing the Project; and

WHEREAS, the City Council executed a construction contract with Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for an amount of $991,401.72 to complete the Project; and

WHEREAS, the City and SSWA desire to enter into a Funding Agreement to more particularly describe the cost share and reimbursement process to City for completing the Project; and

WHEREAS, a change in funding from AB1600 Streets Fund (Fund 261) and Northeast District (Fund 290) to SSWA Reimbursement of $346,178; and

WHEREAS, the revised appropriation constitutes an update to the FY 202 5-2026 Budget approved pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-103.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The attached Funding Agreement between SSWA and City is hereby approved.

Section 2. The city manager is authorized to sign said Funding Agreement.

Section 3. The city manager is authorized to execute amendment s to said Funding Agreement, in a form approved by the city attorney, which modify the reimbursement amount and other elements of the Funding Agreement upon Project completion.

Section 4. The city manager is hereby authorized to do all things necessary to implement the above-mentioned Funding Agreement.

RES. NO. 2025-151

Section 5. The council hereby approved a budget adjustment of $346,178 to release previously allocated fund ing for CPW070123 from Fund 261 ($115,381) and Fund 290 ($230,797) and update funding to SSWA Reimbursement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY/BERTANI/CARR/PANDURO/SANDHU/TONNESEN/WILLIAMS NOES: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: _________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CITY CLERK

-1-
4925-1105-5693.2 014900.001 Error! Unknown document property name.

FUNDING AGREEMENT

(Manuel Campos Parkway Extension Phase 2 and
Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant Improvements)

This Funding Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the ____ day of _______, 2025, by and between the Suisun-Solano Water Authority (“SSWA”), a California joint powers authority formed by the City of Suis un City ("Suisun City") and Solano Irrigation District (“SID” or the "District"), and the City of Fairfield, a California municipal corporation (the “City”), referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. SID owns, and SSWA leases and operates, the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant and appurtenant facilities, located at 1200 Manuel Campos Parkway, Fairfield, CA, generally de scribed as Assessor Parcel Numbers 0167-180-040, 0167-180-110, and 0167-180-120 (the "Cement Hill Plant").

SSWA uses the Cement Hill Plant to provide drinking water to the residents in Suisun City.

B. The City is in the process of ma king certain improvements to Manual Campos Parkway. On March 25, 2016, SID and the City entered a Memorandum of Understanding (the “M OU”), attached as Exhibit B, pursuant to which the City shall make certain improvements to the Cement Hill Plant on behalf of SID (the “SID Upgrades”) and either SID or SSWA shall reimburse the City its proportionate share of costs for those upgrades.

C. The City has commenced Phase 2 of Manual Campos Parkway construction adjacent to the Cement Hill Plant (the “Construction Project”) and agrees to make improvements to the entrance and fencing of the Cement Hill Plant on behalf of SID.

D. On March 25, 2025 the City opened bids for the Construction Project, in accordance with the scope of work set forth in Exhibit A. The lowest responsive bidder was determined to be Ghilotti Bros, Inc. (the "Contractor").

E. On April 15, 2025, the City Council approved the Construction Project plans and specifications and awarded a contra ct to Contractor to complete the work identified in Exhibit A for an amount not to exceed $991,401.72.

F. Under the terms of the SSWA Joint Powers Agreement, upgrades to leased facilities are funded by SSWA. Accord ingly, funds expended by the City to finance the SID Upgrades to the Cement Hill Plant shall be reimbursed by SSWA.

-2-
4925-1105-5693.2 014900.001 Error! Unknown document property name.

G. The City and SSWA desire to enter into this Agreement to more particularly describe the reimbursement process for those SID Upgrades.

Now therefore, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and henceforth incorporated into this Agreement.

2. Term. This Agreement shall terminate upon receipt by the City of the full payment required by Section 4 of this Agreement.

3. City Obligations.

A. The City shall provide for the construction of, and do all things necessary to implement, the SID Upgrades, as well as t hose improvements more fully described in Exhibit A, and as agreed upon in this Agreement.

B. Notwithstanding the agreed upon proportionate responsibility for the Construction Project as stated in the MOU, the City shall provide the following additional funding to SSWA:
1) The City shall contribute $10,000 to SSWA to help fund a new electric gate at the Cement Hill Plant. This contribution is consideration for, and in recognition of, past improvements made by SSWA to an existing driveway used to access the Cement Hill Plant that is no longer available for SSWA use. 2) For work involving and relat ed to grading at the north end of Pond 3, which will be completed by SSWA, the City shall reimburse SSWA up to $55,680. SSWA shall complete this work within three years of the date of execution of this Agreement. Upon completion of the work involving and related to grading at the north end of Pond 3, SSWA shall send an invoice to the City, and the City shall provide reimbursement for all undisputed sums within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice.

C. Upon receipt of all responsive bids for construction of SID Upgrades, and prior to awarding any contracts, the City shall present the bids to SSWA. SSWA shall have ten (10) business days from the City’s notice of the bids to review the projected construction costs, determine whether awarding the contra ct would fall within SSWA's budget, and confirm its consent for the City to proceed. SSWA may withhold its consent only if the award would exceed its available budget. If SSWA determines the bids exceed its budget for its proportionate share, and if an agreeable alternative is infeasible between City and SSWA, then SSWA may terminate this Agreement.

D. To ensure uninterrupted water service to SSWA customers, the City will maintain safe and legal left-turn and right-turn vehicular access to the Cement

-3-
4925-1105-5693.2 014900.001 Error! Unknown document property name.

Hill Plant to allow SSWA staff and its agents safe access to the plant at all times during construction activities.

E. Within five (5) calendar days after City Council accepts the Construction Project as complete, the City shall submit to SSWA an itemized invoice substantiating the actual cost of the SID Upgrades, which wi ll include the total cost for design, bidding, award, construction inspecti on, administration, and construction of SID Upgrades, and as consistent with the City a nd SSWA's agreement to the bids as more particularly described in Section 3(C), above.

F. SSWA shall coordinate with the Contractor and cause for construction of the SID Upgrades to commence within a reasonable amount of time after acceptance of the bids. City and Contractor will be responsible for maintenance and development of the SID Upgrades until SSWA accepts the work as complete. Such acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. After acceptance, each Party will be responsible for maintenance to the improvements on their own property, as such maintenance may be required from time to time.

4. SSWA Reimbursement. Within thirty (30) calendar days after SSWA receives an invoice from the City for the SID Upgrades, SSWA shall reimburse the City in an amount equal to the total cost for the SID Upgrades reflected on the invoice. The cost will include SSWA's proportionate share of design, bidding, award, and construction costs; provided, however, SSWA retains the right to refuse payment of any cost incurred without Parties' prior written and signed consent.

5. Joint Liability and Indemnification.

A. SSWA agrees to indemnify, defend, protect, hold harmless, and release City, their elected bodies, agents, officers and employees (collectively referred to in this paragraph as “City”) from and against any and all claims, losses, proceedings, damages, causes of action, liability, costs, or expense (including attorneys’ fees and witness costs) arising from or in connection with, or caused solely by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of SSWA. This indemnification obligation shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for the indemnifying party under workers’ compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefit acts.

B. City agrees to indemnify, def end, protect, hold harmless, and release SSWA, their elected bodies, agents, officers and employees (collectively referred to in this paragraph as “SSWA”) from and against any and all claims, losses, proceedings, damages, causes of action, liability, costs, or expense (including attorneys’ fees and witness costs) arising from or in connection with, or caused solely by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of City. This indemnification obligation shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for the indemnifying party under workers’ compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefit acts.

-4-
4925-1105-5693.2 014900.001 Error! Unknown document property name.

C. City warrants that SSWA shall be named as an additional indemnitee and insured in those certain agreements between the City and Contractor governing the construction, execution, or completion of the SID Upgrades such that Contractor will indemnify, hold harmless and assume defense of, in any actions of law or in equity, SSWA, its officers, employees, agents, and elective and appointive boards from all claims, losses, damage, including property damage, personal injury, including death, and liability of every kind, nature and description, directly or indirectly arising from the operations of Contractor, their general contractor or any subcontractor, or of any person directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for Contractor any subcontractor but not including the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of SSWA on and within any and all property owned by SID.

D. The obligations of this Section 5 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

6. Insurance.

A. Each Party agrees to maintain in surance or self-insured public entity coverage for general, auto and professional liabilit y insurance coverage with limits of no less than $2,000,000 per occurr ence and no less than four million dollars ($4,000,000) aggregate. Each Party’s insurance will be considered primary for all claims arising out of acts of that Party. Each Party agrees to endorse the other Party, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 20 10 or its equivalent for general liability and auto coverage.

B. Each Party who contracts work to accomplish the Required Improvements or SID Upgrades shall require the contractor to obtain and maintain Worker's Compensation insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Neither Party’s insurance shall be called upon to satisfy any claim for workers’ compensation filed by an employee or contractor of the other Party.

7. Notice. All notices required or authorized by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or by deposit in the United States mail, by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Any mailed notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that a Party desire s to give to the other Party shall be addressed to the other Party at the addresses set forth below. A Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address. Any notice sent by mail in the manner prescribed by this Paragraph shall be deemed to have been received on the date noted on the return receipt or five (5) calendar days following the date of deposit, whichever is earlier.

TO SSWA:

Cary Keaten, General Manager
Solano Irrigation District/Suisun-Solano Water Authority 810 Vaca Valley Parkway, Suite #201
Vacaville, CA 95688

-5-
4925-1105-5693.2 014900.001 Error! Unknown document property name.

TO CITY:

David Gassaway, City Manager
City of Fairfield
1000 Webster Street
Fairfield, CA 94533

8. Cooperation. SSWA and City agree to promptly take whatever steps are necessary to execute, acknowledge, and deliver the documents necessary to effectuate the terms and purpose of this Agreement.

9. Force Majeure. Neither SSWA nor City shall be liable or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Agreement or for any interruption of services, directly or indirectly, from acts of god, civil or military aut hority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, shorta ges of suitable parts, materials, labor or transportation, pandemics, or any similar c ause beyond the reasonable control of the Parties.

10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with and governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California, Solano County.

11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties with regard to the matters set forth in this Agreement and is intended to be and is a final integration of it. There are no representations, warranties, agreements, arrangements, undertakings, oral or written between or among the parties relating to the terms and conditions of this Agreement which are not fully expressed here. The terms are contractual and not a mere recital and it is understood that no alterations, modifications or changes may be effected except by a writing duly executed by all the parties to this Agreement.

12. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties.

The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

SSWA
Suisun-Solano Water Authority

By: ______________________________
General Manager

Approved as to Form:

By: ______________________________
SSWA Counsel
City
City of Fairfield

By: ______________________________
City Manager

Approved as to Form:

By: ______________________________
City Attorney

Exhibit A Print Date: 6/30/2025
Item Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Item Price Total MOU Cost
Sharing
Fairfield
%
Fairfield Cost SID % SID Cost
1 Mobilization LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 17 80% $40,000.00 20% $10,000.00 2 Erosion Control LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2 80% $16,000.00 20% $4,000.00 3 Demolition and Removal LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 21 100% $20,000.00 0% $0.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $185,000.00 $185,000.00 2 80% $148,000.00 20% $37,000.00 5a Grading, Roadway, Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant 2
(Net Cut, See Item 9a for Export) CY 1,215 $35.00 $42,525.00 2 80% $34,020.00 20% $8,505.00 5b Grading, Roadway, Plant 2 to PSC (Net Cut, See Item
9b for Export) CY 50 $35.00 $1,750.00 2 100% $1,750.00 0% $0.00 5c Grading, Sludge Pond 1 (100% Import) - 17' Wide Road (Net Fill) CY 200 $35.00 $7,000.00 4 100% $7,000.00 0% $0.00 5d Grading, Sludge Pond 1 (100% Import) - Add 5' to
Road, 22' total road width (Net Fill) CY 100 $35.00 $3,500.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $3,500.00 5e Grading, South End of Sludge Pond 3 (Net Cut, See
Item 9c for Export) CY 510 $35.00 $17,850.00 2 80% $14,280.00 20% $3,570.00 6a Fine Grading, Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant 2 SF 9,978 $0.75 $7,483.50 2 80% $5,986.80 20% $1,496.70 6b Fine Grading, Plant 2 to PSC SF 2,916 $0.75 $2,187.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $2,187.00 7a Earthwork, Export to Stockpile, Grading Roadway,
Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant 2 CY 1,215 $6.50 $7,897.50 2 80% $6,318.00 20% $1,579.50 7b Earthwork, Export to Stockpile, Grading Roadway,
Plant 2 to PSC CY 50.0 $6.50 $325.00 2 80% $260.00 20% $65.00 7c Earthwork, Export to Stockpile, Grading Pond 3 CY 510.0 $6.50 $3,315.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $3,315.00 8 3" Road Aggregate Base, Sludge Pond 1 SF 2,150 $3.90 $8,385.00 4 100% $8,385.00 0% $0.00 9a 4" Asphalt Concrete, Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant
2 SF 7,982 $5.00 $39,910.00 17 80% $31,928.00 20% $7,982.00 9b 4" Asphalt Concrete, Plant 2 to PSC SF 2,333 $5.00 $11,665.00 20 0% $0.00 100% $11,665.00 10a 14" Aggregate Base, Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant
2 SF 7,982 $6.50 $51,883.00 17 80% $41,506.40 20% $10,376.60 10b 14" Aggregate Base, Plant 2 to PSC SF 2,333 $6.50 $15,164.50 20 0% $0.00 100% $15,164.50 11 AC Dike LF 20 $90.00 $1,800.00 17 80% $1,440.00 20% $360.00 12 Bioretention Swale (includes excavation, 6" perforated pipe, AB, bio retention mix, geotextile fabric), Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant 2 LF 236 $125.00 $29,500.00 7 100% $29,500.00 0% $0.00 13 Grouted Riprap, Manuel Campos Parkway to Plant 2 SF
356 $8.00 $2,848.00 7 100% $2,848.00 0% $0.00
14a 3.5' Concrete Valley Gutter (includes AB), Manuel
Campos Parkway to Plant 2 SF 630 $20.00 $12,600.00 7 100% $12,600.00 0% $0.00 14b 3.5' Concrete Valley Gutter (includes AB), Plant 2 to PSC SF 400 $20.00 $8,000.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $8,000.00
15 Double-Swing Entrance Gate EA 1 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 23 8% $520.00 92% $5,980.00 16 Fencing (Entrance Sides) - MC Parkway LF 108 $162.09 $17,505.72 24 100% $17,505.72 0% $0.00 17 Junction Box on Existing 48" SD EA 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 7 100% $15,000.00 0% $0.00 Suisun-Solano Water Authority Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant - New Access Road

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SSWA-Fairfield MOU Cost Sharing of Ghilotti Bros., Inc. Bid, dated 3/25/25 City of Fairfield

BID SCHEDULE A
250326-SSWA_CH_NewEntrance-MOU_Share-Bid_GhilottiBrosInc_UR Edits_rnp.xlsx Kjeldsen, Sinnock Neudeck, Inc.Page 126 of 326 Exhibit A Print Date: 6/30/2025
Item Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Item Price Total MOU Cost
Sharing
Fairfield
%
Fairfield Cost SID % SID Cost
Suisun-Solano Water Authority Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant - New Access Road

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SSWA-Fairfield MOU Cost Sharing of Ghilotti Bros., Inc. Bid, dated 3/25/25 City of Fairfield
18a 12" PVC Storm Drain Pipe, Manuel Campos Parkway to
Plant 2 LF 208 $160.00 $33,280.00 7 100% $33,280.00 0% $0.00 18b 12" PVC Storm Drain Pipe, Plant 2 to PSC LF 96 $160.00 $15,360.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $15,360.00 19 12" DIP Storm Drain Pipe, Manuel Campos Parkway to
Plant 2 LF 82 $240.00 $19,680.00 7 100% $19,680.00 0% $0.00 20 6" PVC Storm Drain Pipe, Manuel Campos Parkway to
Plant 2 (Sludge pond 1) LF 52 $125.00 $6,500.00 7 100% $6,500.00 0% $0.00 21 Field Inlet - 24" x 24", Manuel Campos Parkway to
Plant 2 EA 7 $7,000.00 $49,000.00 7 100% $49,000.00 0% $0.00 22 Relocate Sign EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 29 0% $0.00 100% $500.00 23 Sawcut Asphalt Concrete LF 65 $11.00 $715.00 17 80% $572.00 20% $143.00 24 Cut and cap 1 1/2" Water Line EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 11 100% $2,500.00 0% $0.00 25 Cut, Relocate & Reconnect 2" Sonitrol Line EA 1 $6,282.00 $6,282.00 11 100% $6,282.00 0% $0.00 26 Bollard EA 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $4,000.00 27 Hydroseed LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 80% $4,000.00 20% $1,000.00 28 Electrical Raceways and Wiring, Gate to Plant 2 LS 1 $163,512.50 $163,512.50 13 0% $0.00 100% $163,512.50 29 Pole Light Fixture including install (one fixture) LS 1 $4,565.00 $4,565.00 15 0% $0.00 100% $4,565.00 30 Sludge Line LF 273 $260.00 $70,980.00 9 0% $0.00 100% $70,980.00 31 AB Transition From New AC Road to Existing AB SF 550 $12.00 $6,600.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $6,600.00 32 Drainage Ditch (include excavation, compaction and
placement of AB) SF 80 $45.00 $3,600.00 3 80% $2,880.00 20% $720.00 33 10" Storm Drain Yard Drain EA 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $1,300.00 34 10" Corrugated Storm Drain Pipe LF 34 $248.00 $8,432.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $8,432.00 $991,400.72 $579,542 $411,859
$991,401 $579,542 $411,859
Gate = $10,000.00
Pond Grading = $55,680.00
TOTAL SID/SSWA = $346,178.80

SUBTOTAL, BID SCHEDULE A

BID SCHEDULE A TOTAL
250326-SSWA_CH_NewEntrance-MOU_Share-Bid_GhilottiBrosInc_UR Edits_rnp.xlsx Kjeldsen, Sinnock Neudeck, Inc.Page 127 of 326 Exhibit A Print Date: 6/30/2025
Item Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Item Price Total MOU Cost
Sharing
Fairfield
%
Fairfield Cost SID % SID Cost
Suisun-Solano Water Authority Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant - New Access Road

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SSWA-Fairfield MOU Cost Sharing of Ghilotti Bros., Inc. Bid, dated 3/25/25 City of Fairfield
1a Grading, Roadway, Plant 2 to PSC (Net Fill) CY 120 $120.00 $14,400.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $14,400.00 1b Grading, North End of Sludge Pond 3 (Net Cut, See
Item 3 for Export) CY 580 $120.00 $69,600.00 2 80% $55,680.00 20% $13,920.00 2 Fine Grading, Plant 2 to PSC SF 7,838 $0.75 $5,878.50 3 0% $0.00 100% $5,878.50 3 Earthwork, Export to Stockpile, Grading North End of
Pond 3 CY 580 $6.50 $3,770.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $3,770.00 4 3" Road Aggregate Base, Sludge Pond 3 SF 7,620.0 $2.25 $17,145.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $17,145.00 5 4" Asphalt Concrete, Plant 2 to PSC SF 6,270 $6.00 $37,620.00 20 0% $0.00 100% $37,620.00 6 14" Aggregate Base, Plant 2 to PSC SF 6,270 $6.60 $41,382.00 20 0% $0.00 100% $41,382.00 7 Bioretention Swale (includes excavation, 6" perforated pipe, AB, bio retention mix, geotextile fabric), Plant 2 to PSC LF 152 $145.00 $22,040.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $22,040.00 8 Grouted Riprap, Plant 2 to PSC SF 115 $6.50 $747.50 8 0% $0.00 100% $747.50 9 3.5' Concrete Valley Gutter (includes AB), Plant 2 to PSC SF 740 $20.00 $14,800.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $14,800.00 10 3' Concrete Valley Gutter (includes AB), Plant 2 to PSC SF 180 $40.00 $7,200.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $7,200.00 11 12" PVC Storm Drain Pipe, Plant 2 to PSC LF 118 $140.00 $16,520.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $16,520.00 12 Field Inlet - 24" x 24", Plant 2 to PSC EA 2 $8,000.00 $16,000.00 8 0% $0.00 100% $16,000.00 13 Deduction, AB Transition From New AC Road to
Existing AB Road SF -550.0 $11.00 -$6,050.00 3 0% $0.00 100% -$6,050.00 14 Deduction, Drainage Ditch (include excavation,
compaction and placement of AB) SF -80.0 $45.00 -$3,600.00 3 0% $0.00 100% -$3,600.00 15 Deduction, 10" Storm Drain Yard Drain EA -1 $1,200.00 -$1,200.00 8 0% $0.00 100% -$1,200.00 16 Deduction, 10" Corrugated Storm Drain Pipe LF -34 $220.00 -$7,480.00 8 0% $0.00 100% -$7,480.00 $248,773 $55,680 $193,093
$248,773 $55,680 $193,093
$1,240,174 $635,222 $604,952

ALTERNATE ITEMS
OVERALL TOTAL, BID SCHEDULE A + BID SCHEDULE B

SUBTOTAL, BID SCHEDULE B

BID SCHEDULE B

BID SCHEDULE B TOTAL
250326-SSWA_CH_NewEntrance-MOU_Share-Bid_GhilottiBrosInc_UR Edits_rnp.xlsx Kjeldsen, Sinnock Neudeck, Inc.

Bid Schedule B & C Not Awarded Page 128 of 326
Exhibit A Print Date: 6/30/2025
Item Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Item Price Total MOU Cost
Sharing
Fairfield
%
Fairfield Cost SID % SID Cost
Suisun-Solano Water Authority Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant - New Access Road

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SSWA-Fairfield MOU Cost Sharing of Ghilotti Bros., Inc. Bid, dated 3/25/25 City of Fairfield
1 Cleaning CY 2,000 $18.00 $36,000.00 3 0% $0.00 100% $36,000.00 $36,000 $0 $36,000
$36,000 $0 $36,000
$1,276,173.72 $635,222 $640,952
NOTES:

1. Above items & quantities are based on Bid Level Plans dated January 14, 2025

2. Costs are per the bid provided by Ghilotti Bros., Inc. on March 25, 2025.

BID SCHEDULE C
OVERALL TOTAL, BID SCHEDULE A + BID SCHEDULE B + BID SCHEDULE C

SUBTOTAL, ALTERNATE ITEMS

BID SCHEDULE C TOTAL

ALTERNATE ITEMS
250326-SSWA_CH_NewEntrance-MOU_Share-Bid_GhilottiBrosInc_UR Edits_rnp.xlsx Kjeldsen, Sinnock Neudeck, Inc.

Bid Schedule B & C Not Awarded Page 129 of 326

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

GENERAL NOTES
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C22

CIVIL GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES

TRAFFIC CONTROL

CLEANUP

SURVEY NOTES

EXCAVATION, BACKFILL & COMPACTION

TESTING

OWNERDUST AND MUD CONTROL

ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES

AGENCY CONTACTS

STORM
SEWER

SECTION A-A SECTION B-B

PLAN VIEW

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010
DETAIL PLAN 1
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C33
B.

B
A
A

SECTION B-B

SECTION A-A
SEWER

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010
5 DETAIL PLAN 2
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C44

CONFIGURATION IS FOR ENTRANCE

SIDE OF DOUBLE-SWING GATE

MIRROR THE ABOVE CONFIGURATION
FOR THE EXIT SIDE OF DOUBLE-SWING GATE w/ EXCEPTION:

MOTOR IS INSTALLED INSIDE THE FENCED AREA.

BOTH ENTRANCE AND EXIT GATE TO OPEN AT THE
SAME TIME TOWARD THE SITE.
(SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
CL

CHWTP SIGN
(SEE NOTE 12)

CHWTP SIGN
(SEE NOTE 8)

CHRISTY VALVE BOX MARKED
"SEWER" OR APPROVED EQUAL 8" MIN.
24" MAX.

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SLOPE SLOPE
6" DEEP, 3
PLUG
4" CRUSHED
ROCK BENEATH BOX.

EXTEND MIN. 4" AROUND BOX

CLEANOUT
45° BEND
WYE

REMOVE (E) PLUG

SERVICE
(E) LATERAL

SEWER CLEANOUT
N.T.S.

BUILDING CITY

CITY OF FAIRFIELDDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DETAIL NAME:

GENERAL NOTES:

1. WYE, 45° BEND AND CLEANOUT SHALL BE
VCP.

2. APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN SERVICE LINE
SIZE IS LESS THAN 8".

APPROVED
BY

CITY ENGINEER
DATE: DECEMBER 2020
R.C.E. 74795 SS5

SPECIAL CASE INDUSTRIAL /

COMMERCIAL SEWER CLEANOUT

1+00
4+00

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010
DETAIL PLAN 3
PX
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C4B5

D
S
S
ELEC
E
E
W
W
BO
D
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00 6+006+00
PLANT 2

WASHWATER POND
SLUDGE POND 3
CLARIFIER 3
SLUDGE POND 1
1+00
E

MATCHLINESEEABOVELEFT

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

LAYOUT PLAN
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C56

MATCHLINESEEBELOWRIGHT

MATCHLINE SEE LEFT

MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT

1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00
SLUDGE POND 1

SECTION D-D

SECTION C-C
6 C3
5 C3
5 C3
6 C3

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

GRADING PLAN
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C67

SECTION A-A
5 C3

SECTION B-B
6 C3
6 C3
5 C3
16 C4
16 C4
16 C4
16 C4
16 C4
1 C4B

PLANT 2

WASHWATER POND
SLUDGE POND 3
CLARIFIER 3 CLARIFIER 2
SLUDGE POND 1
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

UTILITY PLAN
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C78

D
S
ELEC
E
E
E
D
SLUDGE POND 1
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

EROSION CONTROL
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C89

D
S
S
ELEC
E
E
E
W
W
BO
D
PLANT 2

WASHWATER POND
SLUDGE POND 3
CLARIFIER 3 CLARIFIER 2
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00
1+00 2+00 2+24
1+00 1+81
2+00
3+00
4+00 5+00 6+006+00
SLUDGSLUDGE POND 1

PROJECT SURVEYOR

PROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OF
KSN PROJECT FILE NO.

SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

CEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANT

NEW ACCESS ROAD
CCS83, ZONE 2

LOCAL CONTROL
DECEMBER 2024
21 2524-0010

MATCHLINE SEE ABOVE RIGHT

PAVING PLAN
JDK
PX
ERS

AS NOTED
C910

MATCHLINE SEE BELOW LEFT

SECTION 16010: ELECTRICAL GENERAL PROVISIONSPART I: GENERAL

1.01 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
A.

B. THIS SECTION SUPPLEMENTS ALL SECTIONS OF DIVISION 16AND SHALL APPLY TO ALL PHASES OF WORK HEREINAFTERSPECIFIED, SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, OR REQUIRED, TOPROVIDE A COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICALSYSTEMS FOR THIS PROJECT.

REFER TO THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTARYGENERAL CONDITIONS, CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS ANDDIVISION 1, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

1.02 DEFINITIONS (APPLICABLE TO DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS) ABOVE GRADE:

BELOW GRADE:

CONCEALED:

NOT BURIED IN GROUND AND NOT EMBEDDED INCONCRETE SLAB ON GROUND.

BURIED IN GROUND OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETESLAB IN GROUND.

INSIDE BUILDING ABOVE GRADE AND LOCATEDWITHIN WALLS, FURRED SPACES, CRAWLSPACES, ATTIC AND ABOVE SUSPENDED CEI-LINGS, ETC. IN GENERAL, ANY ITEM NOTVISIBLE OR DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE.

CONNECT:COMPLETE HOOKUP OF ITEM WITH REQUIREDSERVICES, INCLUDING CONDUIT, WIRES ANDOTHER ACCESSORIES.

CONTRACTOR:ELECTRICAL SUB-CONTRACTOR UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.

EXPOSED:EITHER VISIBLE OR SUBJECT TO MECHANICALOR WEATHER DAMAGE, INDOORS OR OUTDOORS,INCLUDING AREAS SUCH AS MECHANICAL ANDSTORAGE ROOMS. IN GENERAL, ANY ITEM THAT ISDIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT REMOVING PANELS,WALLS, CEILING OR OTHER PARTS OF STRUCTURE.

FURNISH:

INSTALL:

PROVIDE:

UNDERGROUND:

USE (VERB):

WIRING:

SUPPLY AND DELIVER COMPLETE.

PLACE, SECURE AND CONNECT AS REQUIRED TOMAKE FULLY OPERATIONAL.

FURNISH AND INSTALL AS DEFINED ABOVE;PERFORM WORK.

BURIED IN GROUND, INCLUDING UNDERBUILDING SLABS.

FURNISH AND INSTALL AS DEFINED ABOVE.

ELECTRICAL RACEWAY, CONDUCTOR ANDCONNECTION

1.03 SCOPE OF WORK
A. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ANDPROVIDE ALL LABOR REQUIRED AND NECESSARY TO COMPLETETHE WORK SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND /OR SPECIFIED INDIVISION 16 AND ALL OTHER WORK AND MISCELLANEOUS INITEMS, NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED, BUT REASONABLYINFERRED FOR A COMPLETE INSTALLATION, INCLUDING ALLACCESSORIES AND APPURTENANCES REQUIRED FOR TESTINGTHE SYSTEM. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS ANDSPECIFICATIONS THAT ALL SYSTEMS BE COMPLETE ANDREADY FOR OPERATION.

B. RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE1. SEE HVAC: DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. SEE PLUMBING: DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

1.04 CODE COMPLIANCE
A. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATESTRULES, CODES AND REGULATIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOTLIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING.

1. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT STANDARDS (OSHA).2. NFPA #70: NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC).3. NFPA #101: LIFE SAFETY CODE.4. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

B. CODE COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY. NOTHING IN THESEDRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PERMITS WORK NOTCONFORMING TO THESE CODES. WHERE WORK IS SHOWN TOEXCEED MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS, COMPLY WITH DRAWINGSAND SPECIFICATIONS.

C. NO WORK SHALL BE CONCEALED UNTIL AFTER INSPECTIONAND APPROVAL BY PROPER AUTHORITIES. IF WORK ISCONCEALED WITHOUT INSPECTION AND APPROVAL, THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK REQUIREDTO OPEN AND RESTORE THE CONCEALED AREAS IN ADDITION TOALL REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS.

1.05 LICENSE, FEES AND PERMITS
A. ARRANGE FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND PAY ALLLICENSE, PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES.

1.06 CONDITIONS AT SITE
A. VISIT TO SITE IS REQUIRED OF ALL BIDDERS PRIOR TOSUBMISSION OF BID. ALL WILL BE HELD TO HAVE FAMILIARIZEDTHEMSELVES WITH ALL DISCERNIBLE CONDITIONS AND NO EXTRAPAYMENT WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK REQUIRED BECAUSE OFTHESE CONDITIONS, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED OR NOT.

B. LINES OF OTHER SERVICES THAT ARE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OFTHIS WORK SHALL PROMPTLY BE REPAIRED AT NOEXPENSE TO THE OWNER TO COMPLETE SATISFACTION OF THEOWNER.

1.07 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. ALL DRAWINGS AND ALL DIVISIONS OF THESE SPECIFICATIONSSHALL BE CONSIDERED AS A WHOLE AND WORK OF THIS DIVISIONSHOWN ANYWHERE THEREIN SHALL BE FURNISHED UNDER THISDIVISION.

B. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE THEGENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF EQUIPMENT AND WIRING MOST DIRECTROUTING OF CONDUITS AND WIRING IS NOT ASSURED. EXACTREQUIREMENTS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY ARCHITECTURAL,STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL CONDITIONS OF THE JOB. CONSULTALL OTHER DRAWINGS IN PREPARATION OF THE BID. EXTRA LENGTHSOF WIRING OR ADDITION OF PULL OR JUNCTION BOXES, ETC.,NECESSITATED BY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID.CHECK ALL INFORMATION AND REPORT ANY APPARENTDISCREPANCIES BEFORE SUBMITTING BID.

C. RIGHT IS RESERVED TO MAKE CHANGE. UP TO TEN FEET INLOCATION OF ANY OUTLET OR EQUIPMENT PRIOR TOROUGHING-IN WITHOUT INCREASING CONTRACT COST.

D. EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES SHALL BE CONNECTED TO PROVIDECIRCUIT CONTINUITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES,WHETHER OR NOT EACH PIECE OF CONDUCTOR, CONDUIT ORPROTECTIVE DEVICE IS SHOWN BETWEEN ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT ORFIXTURES AND THE POINT OF CIRCUIT ORIGIN.

1.08 SAFETY AND INDEMNITY
A. SAFETY: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELYRESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS OF THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETYOF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THEWORK . THIS THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOTBE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS.

B. NO ACT, SERVICE, DRAWING REVIEW OR CONSTRUCTION REVIEW BYOWNER, THE ARCHITECT, THE ENGINEERS OR THEIR CONSULTANTS, ISINTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THECONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES, IN, ON OR NEAR THECONSTRUCTION SITE.

1.09 RECORD DRAWINGS
A. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COMPLETE RECORD SET OFREPRODUCIBLE TRANSPARENCIES FROM THE ARCHITECT. THIS SHALLBE CORRECTED DAILY TO SHOW ALL CHANGES FROM ORIGINALCONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE KEPT ON THE JOB. THIS SET OFREPRODUCIBLES, CLEARLY AND NEATLY MARKED, SHALL BEDELIVERED TO THE ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION OF THE JOB.

1.10 GUARANTEE
A. GUARANTEE THE INSTALLATION FREE FROM DEFECTS OFWORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTERDATE OF CERTIFICATE OF FINAL PAYMENT AND PROMPTLY REMEDYANY DEFECTS DEVELOPING DURING THIS PERIOD, WITHOUT CHARGE.

PART II:PRODUCTS

2.01 MATERIAL APPROVAL
A. ALL MATERIALS MUST BE NEW AND BEAR UNDERWRITERS'LABORATORIES LABEL. MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY ULTESTING STANDARDS SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY ANINDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY OR A GOVERNMENTALAGENCY.

B. MATERIAL NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS MAYBE REJECTED EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER INSTALLATION.

2.02 SUBSTITUTIONS
A. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, MORE THAN ONE MANUFACTURER HAS BEENLISTED FOR VARIOUS ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT, ANY ONE OF WHICH WILL BEACCEPTABLE. BASE THE BID ON USE OF MATERIALS SPECIFIED. IF, AFTERAWARD OF THE CONTRACT, A SUBSTITUTE IS PROPOSED, THE REQUESTFOR PERMISSION TO SUBSTITUTE SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED WITH ASTATEMENT OF THE AMOUNT OF MONEY TO BE RETURNED TO THECONTRACT IF THE SUBSTITUTION IS PERMITTED. THE ARCHITECT IS THESOLE JUDGE OF ACCEPTABILITY OF PREFERRED SUBSTITUTIONS. IF ASUBSTITUTE IS PERMITTED, AND ANY RE-DESIGN EFFORT IS THEREBYNECESSITATED, THE REQUIRED RE-DESIGN SHALL BE AT THECONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

2.03 SUBMITTALS
A. SUBMIT TO ARCHITECT SEVEN (7) COPIES OF COMPLETE SHOPDRAWINGS AND MATERIALS LISTS, AS NOTED BELOW , FOR REVIEWWITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT. ALL PROPOSEDDEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE CLEARLY LISTED UNDER APROMINENT HEADING ENTITLED "DEVIATIONS." B. SUBMITTALS REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS:

1. MATERIALS LIST: IDENTIFYING INFORMATION COVERING ALL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS.2. SPLICE BOXES AND MANHOLES: DETAILED DRAWINGS INCLUDING ALL DIMENSIONS.3. PANELBOARDS AND SWITCHBOARDS: COMPLETE SHOP DRAWINGS.4. LIGHTING FIXTURES: CATALOG CUTS AND PHOTOMETRIC DATA.

2.04 OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
A. SUBMIT OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS OFEQUIPMENT AS SPECIFIED UNDER DIVISION 1. VERIFYEXACT QUANTITY WITH ARCHITECT.

2.05 PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING
A. DELIVER AND HANDLE MATERIALS IN A MANNER TOPREVENT DAMAGE.

B. STORE AND PROTECT EQUIPMENT FROM WEATHERAND DAMPNESS.

PART III:EXECUTION

3.01 WORKMANSHIP AND CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS
A. ONLY QUALITY WORKMANSHIP WILL BE ACCEPTED.HAPHAZARD OR POOR INSTALLATION PRACTICE WILL BECAUSE FOR REJECTION OF WORK.

B. PROVIDE FOREMAN IN CHARGE OF THIS WORK AT ALLTIMES.

3.02 COORDINATION
A. COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHER TRADES TO AVOID CONFLICT ANDTO PROVIDE CORRECT ROUGH-IN AND CONNECTION FOR EQUIPMENTFURNISHED UNDER OTHER TRADES THAT REQUIRE ELECTRICALCONNECTIONS. INFORM CONTRACTORS OF OTHER TRADES OF THEREQUIRED ACCESS TO AND CLEARANCES AROUND ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT TO MAINTAIN SER-VICABILITY AND CODE COMPLIANCE.

B. VERIFY EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND REQUIREMENTS WITHPROVISIONS SPECIFIED UNDER THIS SECTION. CHECK ACTUAL JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE FABRICATING WORK. REPORT NECESSARYCHANGES IN TIME TO PREVENT NEEDLESS WORK. CHANGES ORADDITIONS SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION AND AGREEDPRICE, SHALL BE AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE.

C. VERIFY WITH UTILITIES COMPANY AND TELEPHONE COMPANY FORALL REQUIREMENTS. ARRANGE WITH THEM SCHEDULING ANDCOORDINATION NECESSARY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE AND MAKINGCONNECTIONS.

3.03 CUTTING AND PATCHING
A. ALL CUTTING AND PATCHING REQUIRED FOR WORK OF THIS DIVISIONIS INCLUDED HEREIN. COORDINATION WITH GENERAL CONTRACTORAND OTHER TRADES IS IMPERATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR THERESPONSIBILITY FOR AND THE ADDED EXPENSE OF ADJUSTING FORIMPROPER HOLES, SUPPORTS, ETC.

3.04 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL
A. ALL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THIS WORKSHALL BE INCLUDED. TRENCHES SHALL BE CUT STRAIGHT AND TRUEAND SHALL BE SHORED AND BRACED WHERE REQUIRED.

3.05 EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SERVICES
A. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, WHERE SHOWN, WEREESTABLISHED FROM BEST POSSIBLE INFORMATION. ASSUME THATTHIS INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFYEXACT LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS BEFORE STARTING WORK. SHOULD,DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, CONDITIONS ARISE THATINDICATE CONDITIONS ARE OTHER THAN INDICATED, NOTIFYARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. USE EXTREME CAUTION SO AS NOT TODAMAGE OR BREAK LINES THAT ARE IN USE. IF BREAKAGE DOESOCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGEAND REPAIRS RESULTING THEREFROM. ALL UNUSUAL CONDITIONSWITH RESPECT TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TOARCHITECT'S ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY.

3.06 CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WORK
A. INSTALL NEW WORK AND CONNECT TO EXISTING WORK WITH MINIMUMINTERFERENCE TO EXISTING FACILITIES. ALL EXISTING SERVICEINTERRUPTIONS MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ADVANCE WITH OWNER TOSUIT HIS CONVENIENCE. DURATION OF INTERRUPTIONS SHALL BE ASAGREE WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHTTO REQUIRE THAT NECESSARY INTERRUPTIONS BE AT TIMES OTHERTHAN USUAL BUSINESS HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THEAPPROVED WORK PHASING SEQUENCE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERAND ARCHITECT. MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS OPERATIONS OF EXISTINGFACILITIES AS REQUIRED WITH NECESSARY TEMPORARYCONNECTIONS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING WORK.RESTOREEXISTING DISTURBED WORK TO ORIGINAL CONDITION, INCLUDINGMAINTENANCE OF WIRING CONTINUITY AS REQUIRED.

3.07 ACCEPTANCE DEMONSTRATION
A. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, AT A TIME TO BE DESIGNATED BYTHE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMONSTRATE FOR THEOWNER THE OPERATION OF THE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION,INCLUDING ANY AND ALL SPECIAL ITEMS INSTALLED BY HIM ORINSTALLED UNDER HIS SUPERVISION.

3.08 FIELD TEST AND OPERATIONAL CHECK
A. ARRANGEMENTS FOR A FINAL TEST AND INSPECTION OF COMPLETEDSYSTEMS BY THE ARCHITECT SHALL INCLUDE:

1. DEMONSTRATION THAT ALL CIRCUITS, LIGHTS AND EQUIPMENT OPERATE SATISFACTORILY AND AS CALLED FOR, WITH FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT/DEVICES CONNECTED.

2. VERIFICATION OF PROPER DIRECTION OF ROTATION OF ALLMOTORS.

3. INSPECTION OF ALL EQUIPMENT AND INTERIOR OF ALL SWITCHBOARDS, PANELS, CABINETS, HANDHOLES ANDOTHER ITEMS AS APPLICABLE.

4. SPOT CHECK VERIFICATION OF COLOR CODING, TAGGING,NUMBERING AND SPLICE MAKE UP.

B. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM INSULATION TEST OF ALL BRANCHCIRCUITS AND OPERATIONAL CHECK OF ALL SYSTEMS.

C. PERFORM UNDER FULL LOAD CONDITIONS AND IN PRESENCE OFARCHITECT OR OWNER.

D. GROUND RESISTANCE TEST: SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH AGROUND RESISTANCE DIRECT -READING SINGLE TEST METERUTILIZING THE FALL-OF-POTENTIAL METHOD AND TOW REFERENCEELECTRODES. PERFORM TEST PRIOR TO INTERCONNECTION OF THEGROUND RODS TO OTHER GROUNDING SYSTEMS. GROUNDRESISTANCE SHOULD BE 5 OHMS MAXIMUM. PROVIDE ADDITIONALGROUND RODS IF REQUIRED.

END OF SECTION
SECTION 16040FIELD TEST AND OPERATIONAL CHECK
PART 1:GENERAL

1.01 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
A. REFER TO THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY GENERALCONDITIONS, CONTROL REQUIREMENTS AND DIVISION 1 -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

B. REFER TO SECTION 16010, ELECTRICAL GENERAL PROVISIONS.

1.02 DESCRIPTION
A. WORK INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION:

1. GROUND RESISTANCE TEST.

2. TRANSFORMER AND EXISTING SWITCHBOARD OPERATIONALCHECK.1.03 GENERAL SCOPE A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENGAGE AND PAY FOR THE SERVICES OF ARECOGNIZED INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY FOR THEPURPOSE OF PERFORMING INSPECTIONS AND TESTS AS HEREINSPECIFIED.

B. THE TESTING LABORATORY SHALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIAL,EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND TECHNICAL SUPERVISION TO PERFORMSWITCH TESTS AND INSPECTIONS.

C. IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE TESTS TO ASSURE THAT ALL ELECTRICALEQUIPMENTS, BOTH CONTRACTOR AND OWNER-SUPPLIED, ISOPERATIONAL AND IS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGNSPECIFICATIONS.

D. THE TESTS AND INSPECTIONS SHALL DETERMINE THE SUITABILITYFOR ENERGIZATION.

E. SCHEDULE TESTS AND GIVE A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS ADVANCENOTICE TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

1.04 QUALIFICATIONS OF TESTING AGENCY
A. THE TESTING AGENCY SHALL MEET FEDERAL 0SHA CRITERIA FORACCREDITATION OF TESTING LABORATORIES, TITLE 29, PART 1907.MEMBERSHIP IN THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL TESTING ASSOCIATIONCONSTITUTES PROOF OF MEETING SUCH CRITERIA.

1.05 TEST INSTRUMENT TRACEABILITY
A. THE TESTING LABORATORY SHALL HAVE A CALIBRATION WHICHMAINTAINS ALL APPLICABLE TEST INSTRUMENTATION WITHIN RATEDACCURACY.

B. THE ACCURACY SHALL BE TRACEABLE TO THE NATIONAL BUREAU OFSTANDARDS IN AN UNBROKEN CHAIN.

C. INSTRUMENTS SHALL BE CALIBRATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEFOLLOWING FREQUENCY SCHEDULE:

1. FIELD INSTRUMENTS:6 MONTHS MAXIMUM.

2. LABORATORY INSTRUMENTS: 12 MONTHS.

3. LEASED SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT: 12 MONTHS, (WHERE ACCURACY IS GUARANTEED BY LESSOR, I.E., DOBLE).

D. DATED CALIBRATION LABELS SHALL BE VISIBLE ON ALL TESTEQUIPMENT.

2.02 WIRES AND CABLES
A. FOR POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS 600V OR LESS:

1. CONDUCTOR: #12 AND #10 AWG SOLID COPPER. #8 AWG ANDLARGER SHALL BE STRANDED COPPER.

2. INSULATION TYPE: #12 TO #1 AWG SHALL BE THWN FOR WET ORUNDERGROUND LOCATIONS AND THHN FOR DRY LOCATIONS.#1/0 THROUGH #4/0 AWG SHALL BE TYPE XHHW (55 MILS).#250 MCM AND LARGER SHALL BE TYPE XHHW (65 MILS).GROUNDING WIRE SHALL BE TYPE THWN.3. MINIMUM CONDUCTOR SIZE:

A. MINIMUM SIZE. #12 AWG FOR 120/208V CIRCUIT RUNS LESS THAN 100 FEET (200 FEET FOR 277/480V SYSTEMS).

B. RUNS OVER 100 FEET FOR 120/208V SYSTEM (OR 200 FEET FOR 277/480V SYSTEM) SHALL BE #10 AWG OR LARGER AS DIRECTEDBY NEC VOLTAGE DROP RESTRICTIONS.

C.UNDERGROUND CIRCUITS SHALL USE #10 AWG MINIMUM WIRES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON ELECTRICALOR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING, MOUNTING HEIGHTS OFDEVICES FROM CENTER LINE TO FINISHED FLOOR SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

3.07 MOUNTING HEIGHTS OF DEVICES
SWITCHES:RECEPTACLES:TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLETS:
44"15"15"
NOTE: ALL DEVICE HEIGHTS FOR CONNECTION OFMACHINERY SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH OWNER.

END OF SECTION
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION.

NOTE:

1. 2.UNDERGROUND: USE RIGID STEEL OR PLASTIC.

RIGID STEEL CONDUIT SHALL BE ENCASEDIN 3" MINIMUM CONCRETE ENVELOPE AND MAYBE USED ALL SERVICES.

A.

B.PLASTIC CONDUIT 2" OR GREATER SHALL BE INSTALLEDAS DIRECTED ON PLANS.

C.PLASTIC CONDUIT 1-1/2" SIZE ANDSMALLER SHALL BE INSTALLED ON 3" SAND BASE ANDCOVERED BY 3" SAND BACKFILL. IN PLANTING AREAS.PROVIDE 2" CONCRETE CAP. MULTIPLE RUNS SHALLMAINTAIN 3" MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN RUNS.

BURIAL DEPTH OF CONDUITS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:4.

3.MAKE ALL RISERS TO GRADE WITH PVC COATED RIGID STEELCONDUIT AND ELBOW FITTINGS ONLY. CONCRETE ENCASE.UNDERGROUND PORTION OF STEEL CONDUIT OR FITTINGS.

CONCRETE ENCASED: 24" MINIMUM FOR600V OR LOWER SYSTEMS TO TOP OF CONCRETE ENCASEMENT.

CONCRETE CAPPED: 24" MINIMUM TO TOPOF CONDUIT.

CONDUITS WITHOUT CONCRETE ENCASEMENTOR CAP: 24" MINIMUM TO TOP OF CONDUIT.

WHEN INSTALLED UNDER BUILDINGS THE ABOVE MINIMUM DEPTHSHALL BE 18" BELOW BOTTOM OF FLOOR SLAB AND PROVIDE METELDETECTION TAPE ABOVE UNDERGROUND DUCT BANK.

A.

B.

C.

D.

PROVIDE ALL JUNCTION BOXES AS REQUIRED TOLIMIT ANY POWER SYSTEM CONDUIT RUN TO A MAXIMUM OF FOUR90 DEGREE BENDS (TWO90 DEGREE BENDS FOR TELEVISIONCABLE CONDUIT RUNS) OR TO AVOID "U" BENDS.

D.

INSTALLATION OF CONDUITS
GENERAL:A.

3.03 RUN ALL CONDUITS CONCEALED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ORSHOWN.RUN EXPOSED CONDUIT PARALLEL TO OR RIGHT ANGLES TOCENTER LINES OF COLUMNS AND BEAMS RUN NO CONDUIT IN CONCRETE SLABS OR FLOORS EXCEPT ATPOINT OF PENETRATION. ALL PENETRATION SHALL BE ATRIGHT ANGLES TO SLAB SURFACES.

INSTALL CONDUITS ABOVE CEILINGS TO AVOID OBSTRUCTINGREMOVAL OF CEILING TILES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, AIRDIFFUSERS,ETC.CONDUITS SHALL NOT CROSS ANY DUCT SHAFT OR AREADESIGNATED AS FUTURE DUCT SHAFT HORIZONTALLY. CONDUITRISES WHEN ALLOWED IN DUCT SHAFT MUST BE COORDINATEDWITH MECHANICAL WORK TO AVOID ANY CONFLICT.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. SUPPORT CONDUITS WITH UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES LISTEDSTEEL CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERVALS REQUIRED BY THENATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. WIRES OR SHEET METAL STRIPSARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR CONDUIT SUPPORT. USE CONDUITHANGERS FOR ALL CONDUITS NOT DIRECTLY FASTENED TOSTRUCTURE AND FOR ALL MULTIPLE CONDUIT RUNS.

CONDUIT SUPPORTS:B.

INDIVIDUAL CONDUIT 1/2" AND 3/4" SIZE MAY BESUPPORTED FROM CEILING SUPPORT WIRES WITH CADDY CLIPSONLY IF ACCEPTABLE TO LOCAL CODE. ONLY ONE CONDUIT ISPERMITTED TO BE ATTACHED TO ANY CEILING SUPPORT WIRE.HANG SUCH CONDUIT SO AS NOT TO AFFECT LEVEL OF CEILING.

AVOID ATTACHING CONDUIT TO FAN PLENUMS. WHEN IT ISNECESSARY TO SUPPORT CONDUIT FROM FAN PLENUM, PROVIDE ALENGTH OF FLEXIBLE CONDUIT BETWEEN PORTION ATTACHED TOTHE FAN PLENUM AND PORTION ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING TOMINIMIZE TRANSMISSION OF VIBRATION TO THE BUILDING STRUCTURE.

CONDUIT PENETRATION CONDUIT PENETRATIONS OF ROOF.WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE SEALED TO PRESERVETHE INTEGRITY OF WATERPROOFING, FIRE RATING ANDSOUNDPROOFING FOR WHICH THE ROOF, WALL FLOOR OR CEILINGIS DESIGNED, MATERIALS AND METHODS USED SHALL CONFORM TOTHAT SPECIFIED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL SECTIONS.

2. 1.

3. C.

ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND DUCTS 2" AND LARGER SHALLBE PROVEN CLEAR BY PILLING THROUGH A MANDREL 1/4"SMALLER THAN THE INSIDE DIAMETER.

WHERE FLUSH BRANCH CIRCUIT PLANELOADS OR TERMINALCABINETS ARE SHOWN ON WALLS, STUB A MINIMUM OF FOUR 1"EMPTY CONDUITS INTO OVERHEAD CEILING SPACES AND FOUT 1"ADDITION TO CONDUITS REQUIRED FOR CIRCUIT WIRING D.

E.

CONCRETE DUCT BANK CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE PLASTIC SPACERS AT MAXIMUM 5"-0" CENTERS TOMAINTAIN 3" SPACING BETWEEN CONDUITS, DRIVE TWOREIL\NFORCING BARS TO ANCHOR THE CONDUITS AT 10"-0" ONCENTERS TO PREVENT FLOATING DURING CONCRETE POUR WHENINSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS, PROVIDE REINFORCING BARS ASSHOWN ON DRAWINGS.

3.04A.

INSTALLATION OF WIRES

PULL NO WIRE INTO ANY OF THE CONDUIT SYSTEMUNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK WHICH MAY DAMAGE THE WIRE HASBEEN COMPLETED

3.05A.

INSTALL ALL WIRE CONTINUOUS FROM OUTLET TO OUTLET ORTERMINAL TO TERMINAL, SPLICES IN CABLES WHEN REQUIREDSHALL BE MADE IN HANDHOLDS , PULL BOXES OR JUNCTION BOXES.MAKE BRANCH CIRCUIT SPLICES IN OUTLET BOXES WITH 8" OFCORRECTLY COLOR-CODE TAILS LEFT IN THE BOX.

B.

SPLICE IN WIRES AND CABLES SHALL BE MADE UTILIZING MATERIALSAND METHODS DESCRIBED HEREIN BEFORE.C.

ALL CABLES AND WIRES PASSING THROUGH MANHOLES ANDHANDHOLDS SHALL BE FULL LOOPED INSIDE THE MANHOLES ANDHANDHOLDS AND SUPPORTED ON GALVANIZED STEEL RACKS.

D.

MAKE ALL GROUND, NEUTRAL AND LINE CONNECTIONS TORECEPTACLE AND WIRING DEVICE TERMINAL AS RECOMMENDED BYMANUFACTURER, PROVIDE GROUND JUMPER FROM OUTLET BOX TOGROUND TERMINAL OF DEVICES WHEN THE DEVICE IS NOTAPPROVED FOR GROUNDING THROUGH THE MOUNTING SCREWS.

E.

PROVIDE BRADY WIRE MARKERS WHERE OF CONDUCTORSIN A BOX EXCEEDS FOUR.E.

COLOR CODE WIRES AS FOLLOWS:B.

PHASE A
WIRE COLOR CODECOLOR CODE ALL CONDUCTORS. WIRE SIZES #8 AWG ANDSMALLER SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL COLOR CODED INSULATION. WIRESIZES #6 AWG AND LARGER MAY HAVE BLACK INSULATION BUTIDENTIFIED BY COLOR CODED ELECTRICAL TAPE AT ALLJUNCTION, SPLICE PULL OR TERMINATION POINTS. COLOR TAPESHALL BE APPLIED 1/2 LAP TO AT LEAST 6" OF THE CONDUCTOR.

3.06A.

PHASE BPHASE CNEUTRALGROUND

BROWNORANGEYELLOWWHITE OR GRAYGREEN

BLACKBLUE OR RED

WHITE OR GRAY

BLACKORANGE

WHITE OR GRAYBLUE

BLACKREDBLUEWHITEGREEN
FOR SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATIONS CIRCUITS:

C. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS: GENERAL ELECTRIC, ANACONDA,OKONITE, PARANITE, PIRELLI-GENERAL OR TRIANGLE PRODUCTSCONFORMING TO OR EXCEEDING APPLICABLE IPCEA STANDARDS.

1. 2. CONDUCTORS FOR GENERAL USE SHALL BE STRANDED COPPERCONDUCTOR, #16 AWG MINIMUM, WITH THWN INSULATION FORUNDERGROUND OR WET LOCATIONS AND THWN INSULATION FORDRY LOCATIONS.

SPECIAL CABLES SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON DRAWINGS.

OUTLET BOXES: HOT-DIPPED, GALVANIZED OR SHERARDIZEDOF REQUIRED SIZE, 4" SQUARE, MINIMUM, FOR FLUSH MOUNTEDDEVICES AND LIGHTING FIXTURES. CAST TYPE WITH CASKETEDCOVERS FOR OUTDOORS OR WET LOCATIONS

CONDUIT HANGERS
JUNCTION AND PULL BOXES: USE OUTLET BOXES WITHAPPROPRIATE COVERS AS JUNCTION BOXES WHEREVER POSSIBLE.LARGER JUNCTION AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE FABRICATED FROMSHEET STEEL, SIZED ACCORDING TO CODE, WITH SCREW-ONCOVERS, FINISHED GRAY BAKED ENAMEL A.

B.

2.03 OUTLET BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES AND PULL BOXES

WIRE CONNECTORS

TERMINAL CABINETS
WIRE DEVICES2.04

2.05 2.06

2.07 MISCELLANEOUS MATFRIALS2.08
EXECUTIONPART III:

GENERAL3.01
WIRING METHOD3.02
A.

B.

A.

B.

A.

A.

B.

A.

DEVICE PLATES: NYLON "STYLE-LINE" SERIES FOR FLUSHWITH COLOR AS SELECTED BY ARCHITECT AND GALVANIZED STEELFOR SURFACE MOUNTED DEVICES EXCEPT CERTAIN AREAS MAYREQUIRE IVORY OR BROWN BACKELIGHT PLATES AND DEVICES.CONFIRM FINISHED PLATES SHALL BE WITH HINGED COVER, HUBBELL"RCV" SERIES.

DUPLEX CONVENIENCE RECEPTACLES: 3-POLE GROUNDED"STYLE-LINE" SERIES 21, RATED 20 AMPERES, 125V HUBBELL#2162 SERIES.

FOR MULTIPLE CONDUIT RUNS, USE UNISTRUT OR POWERSTRUTTRAPEZE TYPE CONDUIT SUPPORT DESIGNED FOR MAXIMUMDEFLECTION NOT GREATER THAN 1/8".

FOR INDIVIDUAL CONDUIT RUNS NOT DIRECTLY FASTENED TOTHE STRUCTURE, USE ROD HANGERS MANGERS MANUFACTURED BY CADDY,UNISTRUT OR POWERSTRUT.

FABRICATED FROM CODE GAUGE STEEL, SIZE AS INDICATED ONDRAWINGS, WITH FLUSH LATCH AND CONCEALED HINGES. WHERESIZE IS NOT INDICATED, MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE 24"W X 30"HX 5"D. FINISH SHALL BE ANSI 61 LIGHT GRAY ENAMEL.

FOR WIRES SIZE #8 AWG AND SMALLER: INSULATED PRESSURETYPE (WITH LIVE SPRING) RATED 105 DEGREES C, 600V FORBUILDING WIRING AND 1000V IN SIGNS OR FIXTURES.SCOTCHLOK OF IDEAL PROVIDE INSIDE TERMINAL CABINET 3/4" THICK PLYWOODBACKBOARD AND TERMINAL STRIPS, ONE TERMINAL POINT FOREACH WIRE WITHIN THE TERMINAL CABINET HANDHOLDS: SHALL BE SIZED AS INDICATED, PRE-CASTCONCRETE TYPE WITH STRUCTURALLY REINFORCED ROADWAY TYPEBOLT-DOWN GALVANIZED STEEL COVERS AND REQUIRED EXTENSIONCOLLARS. UNITS SHELL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE BOTTOMSAND SUMPS. HANDHOLDS SHALL BE LEFT IN A CLEAN CONDITIONWITH ALL DEBRIS REMOVED AND WITH ALL CABLES SUPPORTED ONAPPROVED CABLE SUPPORTS. ALL STUBS FOR HANDHOLDS SHALLBE CONCRETE ENCASED, CHRISTY OR QUICKSET.

CONSULT ALL OTHER DRAWINGS. VERIFY SCALES AND REPORTANY DIMENSIONS DISCREPANCIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS TOARCHITECT BEFORE SUBMITTING BID.

ELECTRIC SYSTEM LAYOUTS INDICATED ON THE DRAWING AREGENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC, BUT SHALL BE FOLLOWED CLOSELY ASACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AND WORK OF OTHER TRADES WILL PERMIT.GOVERN EXACT ROUTING OF CABLE AND WIRING AND THELOCATIONS OF OUTLETS BY THE STRUCTURE AND EQUIPMENTSERVED. TAKE ALL DIMENSIONS FROM ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.

ALL HOME RUNS TO PANELBOARDS ARE INDICATED AS STARTINGFROM THE OUTLET NEAREST THE PANEL AND CONTINUING IN THEGENERAL DIRECTION OF THAT PANEL, CONTINUE SUCH CIRCUITSTO THE PANEL AS THOUGH THE ROUTES WERE COMPLETELYINDICATED. TERMINAL HOME-RUNS OF SIGNAL, ALARM ANDCOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS IN A SIMILAR MANNER.AVOID CUTTING AND BORING HOLES THROUGH STRUCTURE ORSTRUCTURAL MEMBERS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. OBTAIN PRIORAPPROVAL OF ARCHITECT AND CONFORM TO ALL STRUCTURALREQUIREMENTS WHEN CUTTING OR BORING THE STRUCTURE ISNECESSARY AND PERMITTED.

PROVIDE NECESSARY BACKING REQUIRED TO INSURE RIGIDMOUNTING OF OUTLET BOXES.

FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY HARDWARE, HANGERS,BLOCKING, BRACKETS, BARKING RUNNERS, ETC., REQUIRED FOREQUIPMENT SPECIFIED UNDER THIS SECTION.

INSTALL ALL WIRING IN RACEWAY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLYSHOWN OTHERWISE.

MINIMUM CONDUIT SIZE SHALL BE 1/2" WHEN INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND AND 3/4" WHEN INSTALLED UNDERGROUND OR UNDERBUILDING SLABS. INCREASE CONDUIT SIZE AS REQUIRED FORWIRING, SIZE FOR CONDUIT, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWNOTHERWISE, SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM TABLE 3A FORCONDUCTORS #16 THROUGH #4/ AWG AND TABLE 3C FORCONDUCTORS 250 MCM OR LARGER, CHAPTER 9 OF LATESTNOTIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.

ABOVE GROUND: USE RIGID STEEL OR IMC ONLY.

CONDUIT SHALL BE RIGID STEEL, IMC EMT OR PLASTIC ASFOLLOWS:

WET LOCATIONS: RIGID STEEL OR IMCONLY.

HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS: RIGID STEELCONFORMING TO NEC REQUIREMENTS.

LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO MECHANICALNJURY: RIGID STEEL OR IMC ONLY.

IN CONCRETE WALLS OR BLOCK WALLS:RIGID STEEL OR IMC ONLY.

DRY LOCATIONS AND SUBJECT TOMECHANICAL INJURY: EMT, IMC OR RIGID STEEL CONDUIT.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

A.

B.

C.

A.

B.

C.

D.

1. THE TEST REPORT SHALL INCLUF\DE THE FOLLOWING:FINAL SETTINGS SUMMARY OF PROJECT,DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT TESTED.DESCRIPTION OF TEST.LIST OF TEST EQUIPMENT USED IN CALIBRATION ANDCALIBRATION DATE.TEST RESULTS.CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.APPENDIX, INCLUDING APPROPRIATE TEST FORMS.

1.2.3.4. 5.6.7.

1.06 A.

SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF THE COMPLETED REPORT TO THEOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE NO LATER THAN FIFTEEN DAYS AFTERCOMPLETION OF TEST, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED.

THE TEST REPORT SHALL BE BOUND AND ITS CONTENTSCERTIFIED.

FAILURE TO TEST

PRODUCTS
ANY SYSTEM MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP WHICH IS FOUNDDEFECTIVE ON THE BASIS OF ACCEPTANCE TESTS SHALL BEREPORTED DIRECTLY TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE MATERIAL OREQUIPMENT AND HAVE TEST REPEATED UNTIL TEST PROVESSATISFACTORY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

EXECUTION

GROUND RESISTANCE TEST
BUILDING GROUND ELECTRODE RESISTANCE TESTING SHALL BEACCOMPLISHED WITH A GROUND RESISTANCE, DIRECT-READING,SINGLE TEST METER UTILIZING THE FULL-OF-POTENTIAL METHODAND TWO REFERENCED ELECTRODES. PERFORM TEXT PRIOR TOINTERCONNECTION TO OTHER GROUNDING SYSTEM. ORIENT THECONCRETE-ENCASED GROUND ELECTRODE TO BE TESTED AND THETWO REFERENCED ELECTRODES IN STRAIGHT LINE SPACES FIFTY(50) FEET APART. DRIVE THE TWO REFERECE ELECTRODES TEN(10)FEET DEEP.

TEST RESULTS SHALL BE WRITING, AND SHALL SHOWTEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND CONDITION OF THE SOIL AT THETIME OF THE TESTS. IN THE CASE WHERE THE GROUNDRESISTANCE EXCEEDS 2 OHMS, OWNER WILL ISSUE ADDITIONALINSTRUCTIONS.

TRANSFORMER AND BREAKER OPERATIONL CHECK
CHECK CLEANLINESS OF ALL INTERIORS AND ALL PARTS. REMOVEANY EXCESS PACKING, SHIPPING BOLTS, ETC TIGHTEN ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION WITH TORQUE WRENCH TOVALUES RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.

VERIFY PROPER OPERATING CONDITION OF ALL EQUIPMENTMECHANICALLY AND ELECTRICALLY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITEDTO:

IF ANY EQUIPMENT IS FOUND DEFECTIVE DURING OPERATIONALCHECK, IT SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHOUTCOST TO THE OWNER, THE TESTS REPEATED BY THE CONTRACTORWITHOUT COST TO THE OWNER AND REPEATED UNTIL SATISFACTORYRESULTS ARE OBTAINED.

WIRING FOR ALL METERS AND INSTRUMENTATION.

VERIFY RELAY OPERATIONS BY INTRODUCTION OF ACCURATELYMETERED CURRENTS INTO BOTH OVER- CURRENT AND GROUNDFAULT CIRCUITRY AT VALUES WHICH WILL ENABLE ACCURATEDETERMINATION OF THE TRIPPING CHARACTERISTICS.

END OF SECTION
SECTION 16050BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS
PART 1:GENERAL

1.01 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY GENERALCONDITIONS, CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND DIVISION 1,GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

A.

D.

2. 1.

C.

B.

A.

3.02 B.

A.

3.01 PART 3:

PART 2:

B.

A.

1.07 C.

B.

REFER TO SECTION 16010, ELECTRICAL GENERAL PROVISIONS.B.

1.02 DESCRIPTION
A. WORK INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION IS CONDUITS, WIRES ANDOTHER MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONEDIN OTHER SECTIONS OF DIVISION 16, BUT NECESSARY ORREQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT OR SYSTEM OPERATION OR FUNCTION,AND THE LABOR TO INSTALL THEM.RELATED WORK: OTHER SECTIONS OF DIVISION 16.B.

PART 2:PRODUCTS

2.01 CONDUITS AND OTHER RACEWAYS
RIGID STEEL: HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED OR SHERARDIZED.

INTERMEDIATE METAL CONDUIT (IMC): ELECTRO-GALVANIZEDOR SHERARDIZED ELECTRICAL METEL TUBING (EMT): ELECTRO-GALVANIZEDOR SHERARDIZED PLASTIC: SCHEDULE 40 PVC, APPROVED FOR USE AS NON-METALLIC RACEWAY FOR 90 DEGREE C. CONDUCTORS. CARLTON,CERTAINTEED OR KALROY PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES APPROVED FOR THEPURPOSE EQUAL IN ALL RESPECTS TO THE CONDUIT OR RACEWAY,EMT CONNECTORS AND COUPLINGS SHALL BE STEEL COMPRESSIONTYPE.

WIREWAY: CODE GAUGE STEEL, WITH KNOCKOUTS AND HINGEDCOVER. CORROSION RESISTANT GRAY BAKED ENAMEL FINISH.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

B.

SHEET NOTES, GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILSSHOWNON OTHER PARTS OF THIS SET OF DRAWINGSSHALLSUPERSEDE THIS SPECIFICATION SHEET UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.

2. CONDUCTORS 120/208V 277/480V 120/240V, 1 120/240V, 3ØØ PROVIDE AND INSTALL A METALLIC WARNING TAPE ABOVE ADUCT BANK.E.

FILE SPEC:PLOT DATE:\\CONSVR88\SAC2 Quotes and Jobs\Solano ID\42343 SID CHWTP New Entrance\Telstar-Generated Documents\30-42343 Electrical Drawings CAD\E1 Electrical - Construction Notes.dwg May 20, 2024 - 10:58am

PROJECT SURVEYORPROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BYDRAWN BY

CHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OFKSN PROJECT FILE NO.SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing AvenueStockton, CA 95203209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANTNEW ACCESS ROAD

MGFMGFMGF

AS NOTED
CCS83, ZONE 3

LOCAL CONTROL
MAY 2024
2524-0010

PROJECT ENGINEER

ELECTRICAL - CONSTRUCTION NOTES
E111 21

RESISTOR

POTENTIOMETER

CAPACITOR, FIXED

CAPACITOR, ADJUSTABLE
DIODE

DIODE,ZENER

VARISTOR TRANSIENTVOLTAGE SUPPRESSOR

VOLTAGE SURGE SUPPRESSOR,AC

METAL OXIDE VARISTOR

COMPONENTS SWITCHES-PROCESSDEVICES- RELAYWIRING - CONNECTIONS

SYMBOL SYMBOL SYMBOLDESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONSYMBOLDESCRIPTION

DEVICES - MISCELLANEOUS

AUDIBLE ALARM

BATTERY
HEATER
3 PHASE MOTOR = MOTOR HP
3 PHASE MOTOR

SINGLE PHASE MOTOR

TRANSFORMER SIZE AND VOLTAGE AS SHOWN

UTILITY POWER METER

SWITCHES - OPERATOR

TOGGLE OR DISCONNECT SWITCH

PUSHBUTTON -NORMALLY OPEN, MOMENTARYACTION

PUSHBUTTON -NORMALLY CLOSED, MOMENTARYACTION

PUSHBUTTON, MECHANICALLYINTERLOCKED, DOUBLE CIRCUIT -NORMALLY CLOSED AND NORMALLYOPEN, MAINTAINED ACTION SELECTOR SWITCH, 3 POSITION -CONTACT STATUS SHOWN EXISTSAT POSITION OF H-HAND,O-OFF, OR A-AUTO SELECTOR SWITCH, 2 POSITION -CONTACT STATUS SHOWN EXISTSAT POSITION AS SHOWN

FLOW SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASING FLOW

FLOW SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASING FLOW

LEVEL SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASING LEVEL

LEVEL SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASING LEVEL

PRESSURE SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

PRESSURE SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

TEMPERATURE SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

TEMPERATURE SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASINGTEMPERATURE

LIMIT SWITCH-CLOSES AT SET LIMIT

LIMIT SWITCH -OPENS AT SET LIMIT

PROXIMITY SWITCH -CLOSES UPON DECREASINGDISTANCE

PROXIMITY SWITCH -OPENS UPON DECREASINGDISTANCE

TORQUE SWITCH -CLOSES UPON INCREASING TORQUE

TORQUE SWITCH -OPENS UPON INCREASING TORQUE
INDICATING LIGHT, LETTER ``X"INDICATING COLOR: R=REDG=GREEN, A=AMBER, W=WHITEY=YELLOW, B=BLUE

INDICATING LIGHT, PUSH TO TEST

AMP METER

VOLT METER

ELAPSED TIME METER
MULTI-POSITION SWITCHWHERE LETTER ``X" IS FUNCTION:A=AMP, V=VOLT CONTACTOR OR STARTER M1
CONTROL RELAY CR1
TIME DELAY RELAY TR2-ADJUSTABLE TIME DELAYRANGE & SETTING AS SHOWN

TIME DELAY ON ENERGIZATIONTIME DELAY ON DE-ENERGIZATION REFERENCED RELAY WITHN.O. CONTACT ON LINE 107N.O. CONTACT ON LINE 121 NORMALLY OPEN,RELAY CONTACT-ACTUATED BY RELAY CR1COIL LOCATED ON LINE 105 NORMALLY CLOSED,RELAY CONTACT-ACTUATED BY RELAY CR1
NORMALLY OPEN,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS ENERGIZED NORMALLY CLOSED,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED NORMALLY OPEN,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT OPENS AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED NORMALLY CLOSED,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED

CONTACT OPENS AND CLOSESIN A TIMED REPEAT CYCLE

SOLENOID COIL

DEVICES - FRONT PANELDEVICES - PROTECTIVE
CIRCUIT BREAKER, WITH AMPS OR POLES AS SHOWN OR NOTED PROVIDE TRIP UNIT AS SHOWNMCP- MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTORTM- THERMAL MAGNETICLSIG- LONG. SHORT, INST, GFIMCS- MOLDED CASE SWITCH, NO TRIP

THERMAL OVERLOAD CONTACT

THERMAL OVERLOAD ELEMENT

FUSE WITH BLOWN FUSEINDICATING LIGHT
FUSE

KIRK-KEY INTERLOCK

DISCONNECT SWITCH, WITHPOLES AS SHOWN OR NOTEDPROVIDE AMP RATING OR HPRATING AS SHOWN

PLAN - SYMBOLS

PANEL OR EQUIPMENT WIRING

FIELD WIRING

CONDUCTORS-NOT CONNECTED

CONDUCTORS-CONNECTED
GROUND

PLUG AND RECEPTACLE

INCOMING LINE

TERMINAL BLOCKSWITH TERMINAL NUMBER AS SHOWN

TERMINAL BLOCKSWITH TERMINAL NUMBER DETERMINED BY SUBMITTAL

SHIELDED CABLE

CONDUIT, EXPOSED

CONDUIT,IN SLABOR BELOW GRADE

CONDUIT, CONCEALED IN WALLOR CEILING

CONDUIT, STUBBED OUT & CAPPED

CONDUIT, BENDS TOWARDOBSERVER

CONDUIT BENDS AWAYFROM OBSERVER

CONDUIT ENDS

FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONNECTION FROM J-BOX TO EQUIPMENT

CONDUIT CHANGE IN ELEVATION

BARE COPPER GROUND WIRE

GROUND CONNECTION BOLTED TYPE

GROUND CONNECTION EXOTHERMICWELD TYPE

DISCONNECT SWITCH

FIELD MOUNTED DEVICE

SPECIAL RECEPTACLE
TELEPHONE/DATA RECEPTACLE2 PORT TA568A, 2CAT 6 CABLES

CONDUIT NUMBER

THERMOSTAT

EYS SEAL

JUNCTION BOX

PULL BOX OF SIZE SHOWN(CHRISTY BOX SIZE MINIMUM)
LIGHTING FIXTURE# - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBERA - FIXTURE SCHEDULE REF.a - CONTROL SWITCH REFERENCE DUPLEX AND QUADPLEX RECEPTACLE # - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBER TOGGLE SWITCH# - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBERSUBSCRIPT - CIRCUIT CONTROLLEDSUBSCRIPT - BLANK = 1 POLE2 = 2 POLE3 = 3 WAYOTHER - M = MOTION DETECTORT = TIMER SWITCH MISCELLANEOUS ABBREVIATIONS AND&@ ATA AMBER, AMPERESAC ALTERNATING CURRENTACK ACKNOWLEDGEAFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADEAH AMP HOURAI ANALOG INPUTAIC AMP INTERRUPTING CAPACITY SYMMETRICALALTERNATORALT AMMETERAMAO ANALOG OUTPUTAWG AMERICAN WIRE GUAGEBATT BATTERY(B) PROVIDED BY OWNER - INSTALLED BY CONTRACTORBFC BELOW FINISHED CEILING BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMANDBAND PASS FILTERBODBPFBYP BYPASSC CONDUITCAP CAPACITORCB CIRCUIT BREAKERCKT CIRCUITCOAX COAXIAL CABLECOMM COMMUNICATION CR CONTROL RELAYCT CURRENT TRANSFORMER CT CONSTANT SPEEDCU COPPERDC DIRECT CURRENTDET DETAILDI DIGITAL INPUT DISC DISCONNECTDO DIGITAL OUTPUTDPDT DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROWDWG DRAWINGE-DTL ELECTRICAL DRAWING DETAILELEV ELEVATIONENET ETHERNETENET ELAPSED TIME METERESW ETHERNET SWITCH(E) EXISTINGFCS FIELD CONTROL STATIONFLA FULL LOAD AMPSFLEX FLEXIBLE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUITFLOW METERFS FULL SPEEDFVNR FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSINGFVR FULL VOLTAGE REVERSINGFWD FORWARD(F) FUTUREGALV GALVANIZEDGFI GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GND GROUNDGRS GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT GRS-PVVCPVC COATED GRS CONDUITHI HIGHHIM HUMAN INTERFACE MODULEHOA HAND OFF AUTO HP HORSE POWERHPS HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM HS HAND SWITCH

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SURGE SUPPRESSOR
TWISTED AND SHIELDED PAIRTEMPERATURE SWITCHTWISTED AND SHIELDED 3 CONDUCTOR

TIME DELAY RELAYTEMPERATURETHERMAL MAGNETICTELEPHONE COMPANY

TIME DELAY ON DE-ENERGIZATIONTIME DELAY ON ENERGIZATION

TYPICAL

ULTRA LOW HARMONICUNDERGROUND

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDUNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY

VOLT AMPSVOLTAGE

VOLT AMPS REACTIVEVARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVEVALVEVOLTMETER

VOLTAGE MONITOR RELAYVOLTAGE RELAYWATTS
WATER TREATMENT PLANTWEATHER PROOF, NEMA 3R

WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTTRANSFORMER

LIMIT SWITCIIIMPEDANCE

TIME CLOCKTERMINAL BLOCK

SWITCHBOARDSYMMETRICAL
SWITCHS0LENOID VALVESTOPSTARTSOLID STATE STARTERSTAINLESS STEEL RIGID CONDUIT

SPECIFICATIONSTAINLESS STEEL

SERVICE FACTOR AMPSSELECTORSECONDS

SECONDARY, SECONDSCHEDULE

REWIRE, RELOCATE, REVISE, REUSEREMOTE TERMINAL UNITREDUCE VOLTAGE AUTO TRANSFORMER

RESETRESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTORROOT MEAN SQUARERADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCEREFERENCEPOWERPOLYVINYLCHLORIDE

POTENTIAL TRANSFORMER

PRESSURE SWITCH

PUSH TO TEST

FURNISH, INSTALL, AND CONNECTPRIMARY

PAIR, TWISTED AND SHIELDED

POTENTIOMETERPRESSURE

PANELPOWER MONITORPRO RAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERHYDROGEN ION CONCENTRATIONPOWER FAIL RELAY

PULL BOXPUSHBUTTON

POWER FACTOR

POLEOXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIALOVERLOADOPERATOR INTERFACEON CENTERNEWNOT TO SCALENORMALLY OPEN

NIGHT LIGHTNOT IN CONTRACTNORMALLY HELD OPENNORMALLY HELD CLOSEDNORMALLY CLOSED

NEUTRALMERCURY VAPOR, MEDIUM VOLTAGEMULTIPLEXER
MOTOR

MODEMMINMHM SMCPMCM

MAXMAGMLS
LOSLR
L0
LCEL
LAKJIS

I/OINSTISR

I-DTLIHZD
HTRHZ

XFMRWWTP
ZSZ

VRWWPWTP
VMR

VMVLVVFD
VVA
VAR
UPSUON
UG
TYP
ULH
TVSS
TS
TRIAD
TSPR

TRTEMPTMTELCOTDOD
TBTC
SYMM
TDOE
SVSTP
SWSWBD
SSSSTT
SSRCSS
SELSFA
SECS
SPEC
(R)
SECSCH

RTURVAT

RSTRTDRMSRFIREFPWRPVCPTTPT

PSPROVIDEPRIPRPRESSPOTPNLPM
PHPLC
PFPBX
PFR
PPB
ORP
0I0L

OC(N)NTS
NL
NO
NICNHO
N
NC
MV
NHC
MTR
MUX

HEATERHERTZHAZARD

INSTANTANEOUSINPUT/OUTPUT

INTERLOCKINSTRUMENTATION DRAWING DETAIL

INTRINSICALLY SAFE RELAY

INTRINSICALLY SAFE

LIGHTING CONTACTORLOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT

LIGHTNING ARRESTORKILO, PREFIXJUNCTION BOX
LOW

LATCHING RELAYLIMIT SWITCH

LOCK OUT STOP

MOTOR CONTACTORMAGNETIC FLOWMETERMAXIMUM

THOUSAND CIRCULAR MILSMOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR

MOLDED CASE SWITCHMANHOLEMINIMUM, MINUTEMODEMMOTOR OPERATED VALVE C
L
PS
FS
FS
LS
LS
PS
TS
TS
ZS
ZS
ZS
ZS
WS
M
M
M
HTR
RES
MOV
PB
SW
PB
PB
H AO
X
PTT
X
AM
VM
ETM
XS
2-1 1-2
AOH
1-22-1
500A/3PLSI
M1
CR1
TR2
CR1
(105)
CR1
TR2
TR2
TR2
TR2
TR2
SV
OL
K
500A/3PDISC
J
# aA
# #
WS
# $2
a

TDOETDOD
107,121
G
G
G

SHIELDCONDUCTOR

RESISTOR

POTENTIOMETER

CAPACITOR, FIXED

CAPACITOR, ADJUSTABLE
DIODE

DIODE,ZENER

VARISTOR TRANSIENTVOLTAGE SUPPRESSOR

VOLTAGE SURGE SUPPRESSOR,AC

METAL OXIDE VARISTOR

COMPONENTS SWITCHES-PROCESSDEVICES- RELAYWIRING - CONNECTIONS

SYMBOL SYMBOL SYMBOLDESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONSYMBOLDESCRIPTION

DEVICES - MISCELLANEOUS

AUDIBLE ALARM

BATTERY
HEATER
3 PHASE MOTOR = MOTOR HP
3 PHASE MOTOR

SINGLE PHASE MOTOR

TRANSFORMER SIZE AND VOLTAGE AS SHOWN

UTILITY POWER METER

SWITCHES - OPERATOR

TOGGLE OR DISCONNECT SWITCH

PUSHBUTTON -NORMALLY OPEN, MOMENTARYACTION

PUSHBUTTON -NORMALLY CLOSED, MOMENTARYACTION

PUSHBUTTON, MECHANICALLYINTERLOCKED, DOUBLE CIRCUIT -NORMALLY CLOSED AND NORMALLYOPEN, MAINTAINED ACTION SELECTOR SWITCH, 3 POSITION -CONTACT STATUS SHOWN EXISTSAT POSITION OF H-HAND,O-OFF, OR A-AUTO SELECTOR SWITCH, 2 POSITION -CONTACT STATUS SHOWN EXISTSAT POSITION AS SHOWN

FLOW SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASING FLOW

FLOW SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASING FLOW

LEVEL SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASING LEVEL

LEVEL SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASING LEVEL

PRESSURE SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

PRESSURE SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

TEMPERATURE SWITCH-CLOSES UPON INCREASINGPRESSURE (DECREASING VACUUM)

TEMPERATURE SWITCH-OPENS UPON INCREASINGTEMPERATURE

LIMIT SWITCH-CLOSES AT SET LIMIT

LIMIT SWITCH -OPENS AT SET LIMIT

PROXIMITY SWITCH -CLOSES UPON DECREASINGDISTANCE

PROXIMITY SWITCH -OPENS UPON DECREASINGDISTANCE

TORQUE SWITCH -CLOSES UPON INCREASING TORQUE

TORQUE SWITCH -OPENS UPON INCREASING TORQUE
INDICATING LIGHT, LETTER ``X"INDICATING COLOR: R=REDG=GREEN, A=AMBER, W=WHITEY=YELLOW, B=BLUE

INDICATING LIGHT, PUSH TO TEST

AMP METER

VOLT METER

ELAPSED TIME METER
MULTI-POSITION SWITCHWHERE LETTER ``X" IS FUNCTION:A=AMP, V=VOLT CONTACTOR OR STARTER M1
CONTROL RELAY CR1
TIME DELAY RELAY TR2-ADJUSTABLE TIME DELAYRANGE & SETTING AS SHOWN

TIME DELAY ON ENERGIZATIONTIME DELAY ON DE-ENERGIZATION REFERENCED RELAY WITHN.O. CONTACT ON LINE 107N.O. CONTACT ON LINE 121 NORMALLY OPEN,RELAY CONTACT-ACTUATED BY RELAY CR1COIL LOCATED ON LINE 105 NORMALLY CLOSED,RELAY CONTACT-ACTUATED BY RELAY CR1
NORMALLY OPEN,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS ENERGIZED NORMALLY CLOSED,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED NORMALLY OPEN,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT OPENS AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED NORMALLY CLOSED,TIME DELAY RELAY CONTACT-CONTACT CLOSES AFTERTR2 IS DE-ENERGIZED

CONTACT OPENS AND CLOSESIN A TIMED REPEAT CYCLE

SOLENOID COIL

DEVICES - FRONT PANELDEVICES - PROTECTIVE
CIRCUIT BREAKER, WITH AMPS OR POLES AS SHOWN OR NOTED PROVIDE TRIP UNIT AS SHOWNMCP- MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTORTM- THERMAL MAGNETICLSIG- LONG. SHORT, INST, GFIMCS- MOLDED CASE SWITCH, NO TRIP

THERMAL OVERLOAD CONTACT

THERMAL OVERLOAD ELEMENT

FUSE WITH BLOWN FUSEINDICATING LIGHT
FUSE

KIRK-KEY INTERLOCK

DISCONNECT SWITCH, WITHPOLES AS SHOWN OR NOTEDPROVIDE AMP RATING OR HPRATING AS SHOWN

PLAN - SYMBOLS

PANEL OR EQUIPMENT WIRING

FIELD WIRING

CONDUCTORS-NOT CONNECTED

CONDUCTORS-CONNECTED
GROUND

PLUG AND RECEPTACLE

INCOMING LINE

TERMINAL BLOCKSWITH TERMINAL NUMBER AS SHOWN

TERMINAL BLOCKSWITH TERMINAL NUMBER DETERMINED BY SUBMITTAL

SHIELDED CABLE

CONDUIT, EXPOSED

CONDUIT,IN SLABOR BELOW GRADE

CONDUIT, CONCEALED IN WALLOR CEILING

CONDUIT, STUBBED OUT & CAPPED

CONDUIT, BENDS TOWARDOBSERVER

CONDUIT BENDS AWAYFROM OBSERVER

CONDUIT ENDS

FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONNECTION FROM J-BOX TO EQUIPMENT

CONDUIT CHANGE IN ELEVATION

BARE COPPER GROUND WIRE

GROUND CONNECTION BOLTED TYPE

GROUND CONNECTION EXOTHERMICWELD TYPE

DISCONNECT SWITCH

FIELD MOUNTED DEVICE

SPECIAL RECEPTACLE
TELEPHONE/DATA RECEPTACLE2 PORT TA568A, 2CAT 6 CABLES

CONDUIT NUMBER

THERMOSTAT

EYS SEAL

JUNCTION BOX

PULL BOX OF SIZE SHOWN(CHRISTY BOX SIZE MINIMUM)
LIGHTING FIXTURE# - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBERA - FIXTURE SCHEDULE REF.a - CONTROL SWITCH REFERENCE DUPLEX AND QUADPLEX RECEPTACLE # - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBER TOGGLE SWITCH# - CIRCUIT BREAKER NUMBERSUBSCRIPT - CIRCUIT CONTROLLEDSUBSCRIPT - BLANK = 1 POLE2 = 2 POLE3 = 3 WAYOTHER - M = MOTION DETECTORT = TIMER SWITCH MISCELLANEOUS ABBREVIATIONS AND&@ ATA AMBER, AMPERESAC ALTERNATING CURRENTACK ACKNOWLEDGEAFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADEAH AMP HOURAI ANALOG INPUTAIC AMP INTERRUPTING CAPACITY SYMMETRICALALTERNATORALT AMMETERAMAO ANALOG OUTPUTAWG AMERICAN WIRE GUAGEBATT BATTERY(B) PROVIDED BY OWNER - INSTALLED BY CONTRACTORBFC BELOW FINISHED CEILING BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMANDBAND PASS FILTERBODBPFBYP BYPASSC CONDUITCAP CAPACITORCB CIRCUIT BREAKERCKT CIRCUITCOAX COAXIAL CABLECOMM COMMUNICATION CR CONTROL RELAYCT CURRENT TRANSFORMER CT CONSTANT SPEEDCU COPPERDC DIRECT CURRENTDET DETAILDI DIGITAL INPUT DISC DISCONNECTDO DIGITAL OUTPUTDPDT DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROWDWG DRAWINGE-DTL ELECTRICAL DRAWING DETAILELEV ELEVATIONENET ETHERNETENET ELAPSED TIME METERESW ETHERNET SWITCH(E) EXISTINGFCS FIELD CONTROL STATIONFLA FULL LOAD AMPSFLEX FLEXIBLE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUITFMFS FULL SPEEDFVNR FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSINGFVR FULL VOLTAGE REVERSINGFWD FORWARD(F) FUTUREGALV GALVANIZEDGFI GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GND GROUNDGRS GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT GRS-PVVCPVC COATED GRS CONDUITHI HIGHHIM HUMAN INTERFACE MODULEHOA HAND OFF AUTO HP HORSE POWERHPS HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM HS HAND SWITCH

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SURGE SUPPRESSOR
TWISTED AND SHIELDED PAIRTEMPERATURE SWITCHTWISTED AND SHIELDED 3 CONDUCTOR

TIME DELAY RELAYTEMPERATURETHERMAL MAGNETICTELEPHONE COMPANY

TIME DELAY ON DE-ENERGIZATIONTIME DELAY ON ENERGIZATION

TYPICAL

ULTRA LOW HARMONICUNDERGROUND

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDUNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY

VOLT AMPSVOLTAGE

VOLT AMPS REACTIVEVARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVEVALVEVOLTMETER

VOLTAGE MONITOR RELAYVOLTAGE RELAYWATTS
WATER TREATMENT PLANTWEATHER PROOF, NEMA 3R

WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTTRANSFORMER

LIMIT SWITCIIIMPEDANCE

TIME CLOCKTERMINAL BLOCK

SWITCHBOARDSYMMETRICAL
SWITCHS0LENOID VALVESTOPSTARTSOLID STATE STARTERSTAINLESS STEEL RIGID CONDUIT

SPECIFICATIONSTAINLESS STEEL

SERVICE FACTOR AMPSSELECTORSECONDS

SECONDARY, SECONDSCHEDULE

REWIRE, RELOCATE, REVISE, REUSEREMOTE TERMINAL UNITREDUCE VOLTAGE AUTO TRANSFORMER

RESETRESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTORROOT MEAN SQUARERADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCEREFERENCEPOWERPOLYVINYLCHLORIDE

POTENTIAL TRANSFORMER

PRESSURE SWITCH

PUSH TO TEST

FURNISH, INSTALL, AND CONNECTPRIMARY

PAIR, TWISTED AND SHIELDED

POTENTIOMETERPRESSURE

PANELPOWER MONITORPRO RAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERHYDROGEN ION CONCENTRATIONPOWER FAIL RELAY

PULL BOXPUSHBUTTON

POWER FACTOR

POLEOXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIALOVERLOADOPERATOR INTERFACEON CENTERNEWNOT TO SCALENORMALLY OPEN

NIGHT LIGHTNOT IN CONTRACTNORMALLY HELD OPENNORMALLY HELD CLOSEDNORMALLY CLOSED

NEUTRALMERCURY VAPOR, MEDIUM VOLTAGEMULTIPLEXER
MOTOR

MODEMMV

MINMHM SMCPMCM

MAXMAGMLS
LOSLR
L0
LCEL
LAKJIS

I/OINSTISR

I-DTLIHZD
HTRHZ

XFMRWWTP
ZSZ

VRWWPWTP
VMR

VMVLVVFD
VVA
VAR
UPSUON
UG
TYP
ULH
TVSS
TS
TRIAD
TSPR

TRTEMPTMTELCOTDOD
TBTC
SYMM
TDOE
SVSTP
SWSWBD
SSSSTT
SSRCSS
SELSFA
SECS
SPEC
(R)
SECSCH

RTURVAT

RSTRTDRMSRFIREFPWRPVCPTTPT

PSPROVIDEPRIPRPRESSPOTPNLPM
PHPLC
PFPBX
PFR
PPB
ORP
0I0L

OC(N)NTS
NL
NO
NICNHO
N
NC
MV
NHC
MTR
MUX

HEATERHERTZHAZARD

INSTANTANEOUSINPUT/OUTPUT

INTERLOCKINSTRUMENTATION DRAWING DETAIL

INTRINSICALLY SAFE RELAY

INTRINSICALLY SAFE

LIGHTING CONTACTORLOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT

LIGHTNING ARRESTORKILO, PREFIXJUNCTION BOX
LOW

LATCHING RELAYLIMIT SWITCH

LOCK OUT STOP

MOTOR CONTACTORMAGNETIC FLOWMETERMAXIMUM

THOUSAND CIRCULAR MILSMOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR

MOLDED CASE SWITCHMANHOLEMINIMUM, MINUTEMODEMMOTOR OPERATED VALVE C
L
PS
FS
FS
LS
LS
PS
TS
TS
ZS
ZS
ZS
ZS
WS
M
M
M
HTR
RES
MOV
PB
SW
PB
PB
H AO
X
PTT
X
AM
VM
ETM
XS
2-1 1-2
AOH
1-22-1
500A/3PLSI
M1
CR1
TR2
CR1
(105)
CR1
TR2
TR2
TR2
TR2
TR2
SV
OL
K
500A/3PDISC
123123 123
J
T
E
J
# aA
# #
WS
# $2
a

TDOETDOD
107,121
G
G
G

SHIELDCONDUCTOR
FILE SPEC:PLOT DATE:\\CONSVR88\SAC2 Quotes and Jobs\Solano ID\42343 SID CHWTP New Entrance\Telstar-Generated Documents\30-42343 Electrical Drawings CAD\E2 Electrical - Symbols Legend.dwg May 20, 2024 - 10:58am

PROJECT SURVEYORPROJECT ENGINEER

DESIGN BY

DRAWN BYCHECK BY
DATE

SHEET IDENTIFICATION
OFKSN PROJECT FILE NO.SHEET
www.ksninc.com
711 N. Pershing AvenueStockton, CA 95203209-946-0268
916-403-5900
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212West Sacramento, CA 95691

VERTICAL DATUM

HORIZONTAL DATUM

DRAWING SCALE
1"½"0

ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. APPR.

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCEMENT HILL WATER TREATMENT PLANTNEW ACCESS ROAD

MGFMGFMGF

AS NOTED
CCS83, ZONE 3

LOCAL CONTROL
MAY 2024
2524-0010

PROJECT ENGINEER

ELECTRICAL - SYMBOLS LEGEND
E212 21