Fairfield City Council
November 18, 2025

LMNO
Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd Portland Dr
LMNO
Horizon Dr
Clay Bank Rd
Horizon Cir
Clay Bank Rd
LMNO
Gulf Dr Gulf Dr Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
LMNO
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
ill Rd Evergr een Dr
Peppertree Dr
urel Creek
School
Cement Hill Rd
Clay
Ban
k
Rd
Clay Bank
Rd
Hickory Ave
Willow Ln Rebecca
Dr
Gulf Dr
Candleberry Way
Wood
mont Dr
Horizon
Cir
Jamboree Dr
Nightfall Ln
Cement Hill Rd Manuel Campos Pkwy
Laurel Creek
Park
!(
!(
!(
!(
1 2
3 4
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy 1
Existing Plus Background Lane Geometrics and Control
August 2025
Figure 2
NORTH
0 500 1,000 250
Feet
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr 2 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Cir 3 Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/
Cement Hill Rd
4 Fairfield, CA
Villages at Fairfield Parkside TIA
Legend
LMNO Stoplight
!(# Intersection Location
Turning Movement
Project Area

EXHIBIT A

8(5)
3(8)
1(3)3(2)
Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd Portland Dr
47(30)
158(103) 1(4) 52(164)
4(3)
16(48)
Horizon Dr
Clay Bank Rd
Horizon Cir
Clay Bank Rd
5(3) 41(27) 2(5)
14(42)
Gulf Dr Gulf Dr Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
1(2)
13(39)
2(1)
4(12)12(7)
38(24)
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Laurel Creek
Rd
son Hill Rd
Redwood
Dr
Evergr een Dr
Pe
ppertree Dr
Gulf Dr
Baltic Dr
Atlantic Ave
Goldcoast Dr
Laurel Creek
School
Cement Hill Rd
Clay
Bank
R
d
Clay
Bank Rd
Hickory Ave
Willow Ln Rebecca
Dr
Gulf Dr
Candleberry Way
Woodmont
Dr
Horizon
Cir
Western St
Nightfall Ln
Cement Hill Rd
Air Base Pkwy
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Laurel Creek
Park
!(
!(
!(
!(
&&
&&
&&
&
&
1 2
3 4
73%
15%
5%
7%
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy 1
Background Project Trips and Distributions
August 2025
Figure 3
NORTH
0 600 1,200
Feet
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr 2 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Cir 3 Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/
Cement Hill Rd
4 Fairfield, CA
Villages at Fairfield Parkside TIA
Legend
& &VAF Village 1, Village 2, Lago Vista Trip Distribution !(# Intersection Location
XX(XX)AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turning Movement
Project Area

EXHIBIT A

323(595)
14(20)
564(429)
28(34) 39(24)
19(9)
Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd Portland Dr
1(8)
11(23)
24(57)
4(1)
89(42)
277(164) 329(444) 90(248)
80(84)
41(37)
540(373)
63(86)
Horizon Dr
Clay Bank Rd
Horizon Cir
Clay Bank Rd
31(14)
32(23)
61(29) 289(448)
37(60)
28(40)
31(33)
338(337)
22(39)
30(9)
31(25)
33(31)
Gulf Dr Gulf Dr Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
190(294)
146(198)
11(3)
345(229)
9(9)
229(200) 6(24)
215(166)
133(312)
10(0)
16(11)
14(9)
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Laurel Creek
kson Hill Rd
Evergr een Dr
Pe
ppertree Dr
Baltic Dr
Dr
Laurel Creek
School
Cement Hill Rd
Clay
Bank
R
d
Clay Bank Rd
Hickory Ave
Willow Ln Rebecca
Dr
Gulf Dr
Candleberry Way
Woodmont
Dr
Horizon
Cir
Western St
Nightfall Ln
Cement Hill Rd
Air Base Pkwy
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Laurel Creek
Park
Air Base Pkwy Air Base Pkwy
!(
!(
!(
!(
1 2
3 4
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy 1
Existing Plus Background Traffic Volumes
August 2025
Figure 4
NORTH
0 600 1,200
Feet
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr 2 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Cir 3 Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/
Cement Hill Rd
4 Fairfield, CA
Villages at Fairfield Parkside TIA
Legend
!(# Intersection Location
XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turning Movement
Project Area

EXHIBIT A

1(2)2(1)
Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd Portland Dr
13(9) 6(21) 5(15)
19(12)
Horizon Dr
Clay Bank Rd
Horizon Cir
Clay Bank Rd
7(4)
9(6)3(10)
2(7)
Gulf Dr Gulf Dr Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd2(7) 7(4)
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Laurel Creek
kson Hill Rd
Evergr een Dr
Pe
ppertree Dr
Baltic Dr
Dr
Laurel Creek
School
Cement Hill Rd
Clay
Bank
R
d
Clay Bank Rd
Hickory Ave
Willow Ln Rebecca
Dr
Gulf Dr
Candleberry Way
Woodmont
Dr
Horizon
Cir
Western St
Nightfall Ln
Cement Hill Rd
Air Base Pkwy
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Laurel Creek
Park
Air Base Pkwy Air Base Pkwy
!(
!(
!(
!(
&&
&&
&&
&
&
1 2
3 4
15%
5%
73%
7%
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy 1
Project Trips and Distribution
August 2025
Figure 5
NORTH
0 600 1,200 300
Feet
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr 2 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Cir 3 Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/
Cement Hill Rd
4 Fairfield, CA
Villages at Fairfield Parkside TIA
Legend
& & Parkside Trip Distribution
!(# Intersection Location
XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turning Movement
Project Area

EXHIBIT A

323(595)
14(20)
564(429)
29(36) 41(25)
19(9)
Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd Portland Dr
1(8)
11(23)
24(57)
4(1)
89(42)
290(173) 335(465) 95(263)
80(84)
41(37)
559(385)
63(86)
Horizon Dr
Clay Bank Rd
Horizon Cir
Clay Bank Rd
31(14)
39(27)
70(35) 289(448)
37(60)
31(50)
31(33)
338(337)
24(46)
30(9)
31(25)
33(31)
Gulf Dr Gulf Dr Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
190(294)
148(205)
11(3)
345(229)
9(9)
229(200) 6(24)
222(170)
133(312)
10(0)
16(11)
14(9)
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Clay Bank Rd
Laurel Creek
kson Hill Rd
Evergr een Dr
Pe
ppertree Dr
Baltic Dr
Dr
Laurel Creek
School
Cement Hill Rd
Clay
Bank
R
d
Clay Bank Rd
Hickory Ave
Willow Ln Rebecca
Dr
Gulf Dr
Candleberry Way
Woodmont
Dr
Horizon
Cir
Western St
Nightfall Ln
Cement Hill Rd
Air Base Pkwy
Manuel Campos Pkwy
Laurel Creek
Park
Air Base Pkwy Air Base Pkwy
!(
!(
!(
!(
1 2
3 4
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy 1
Existing Plus Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes
August 2025
Figure 6
NORTH
0 600 1,200
Feet
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr 2 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Cir 3 Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/
Cement Hill Rd
4 Fairfield, CA
Villages at Fairfield Parkside TIA
Legend
!(# Intersection Location
XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turning Movement
Project Area

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 12 of 17

INTERSECTION LOS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS
Intersection Level of Service
Table 3 presents a summary of the intersection LOS operations under weekday AM and PM peak hour Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions.

Table 3. Intersection Level of Service
#
Intersection Control
Type
LOS
Criteria
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus
Background
Existing Plus Background
Plus Project
Delay
(sec/veh)
1 LOS Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 Clay Bank Rd & Manuel
Campos Pkwy Signal D
AM 25.2 C 25.3 C
PM 29.5 C 29.7 C
2 Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr Signal D
AM 13.7 B 13.9 B
PM 12.6 B 13.0 B
3 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon
Rd/Horizon Circle Signal D
AM 19.3 B 19.7 B
PM 16.9 B 17.3 B
4 Portland Drive & Manual
Campos Pkwy/ Cement
Hill Rd
Signal D
AM 6.6 A 6.7 A
PM 6.9 A 7.0 A
Notes:
1 For Signals, average delay and LOS are reported.

As shown in Table 3, all study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS under Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions. Synchro software HCM 7th Edition intersection LOS output reports are included in Attachment E.

Intersection Queueing
95th Percentile queues for movements with turn pockets were evaluated using SimTraffic software to determine if currently proposed storage lengths would accommodate near-term future queues. Intersection queueing results are shown in Table 4.

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 13 of 17 Table 4. Intersection Queueing
# Intersection Movement Storage
(ft)
Peak
Hour
95th Percentile Queue (ft)
Existing Plus
Background
Existing Plus
Background
Plus Project
1 Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos
Pkwy
NBL 205
AM 161 156
PM 125 138
SBL 160
AM 43 40
PM 31 29
EBL 340
AM 26 28
PM 13 13
WBL 215
AM 151 158
PM 144 137
2 Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
NBL 215
AM 53 55
PM 64 69
SBL 200
AM 44 49
PM 57 59
EBL 70
AM 54 48
PM 52 54
WBL 95
AM 64 68
PM 48 56
3 Clay Bank Rd & Horizon
Rd/Horizon Circle
NBL 155
AM 83 86
PM 80 85
SBL 200
AM 74 76
PM 89 93
EBL 155
AM 50 50
PM 67 69
WBL 130
AM 165 177
PM 114 125
4 Portland Drive & Manual
Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd WBL 100
AM 47 46
PM 48 49
Notes: Bold values indicate queues exceed storage length.

As shown in Table 4, all queues are projected to fit within storage except for the westbound left-turn queue at Clay Bank Road & Horizon Road/Horizon Circle, which would exceed storage during the AM peak hour under Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions.

The westbound left-turn queue at Clay Bank Road & Horizon Road/Horizon Circle would exceed storage by up to 47 feet (approximately two vehicle lengths) during the AM peak hour under Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions. Westbound left-turn storage at this location is limited by the Ambrosia Way cross street. A potential improvement at this location could be to re-stripe the westbound approach to include a left-turn lane and shared left-through-right-turn lane and implement split phasing for the westbound and eastbound approaches.

SimTraffic queueing reports are included in Attachment F.

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 14 of 17

SITE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION
The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local road extensions of Hideaway Lane and Clementine Lane. Internal circulation of the site would be provided by new local residential streets. The new residential streets would typically be 46 feet wide including one travel lane in each direction, on-street parking, curb, gutter, and sidewalks. There would be one (1) cul-de-sac on the south side of the project to be designed consistent with City standards.

3. CEQA TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS

MULTIMODAL FACILITIES
The Project residential streets would include new sidewalks on both sides of the road which would serve Project residents. The increase in pedestrian, bicycle, and transit demand from the Project is not projected to put existing facilities over capacity or adversely affect existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities in a way that would discourage their use. The Project would not result in unsafe conditions for bicyclists or pedestrians or result in unsafe bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle conflicts. The Project would remain generally consistent with multimodal facilities studied in the VAF EIR for Village I.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) POLICY ANALYSIS
Approved Environmental Document
As stated in the Project History section of this TIA, the certified 2005 VAF EIR originally included a total of 1,102 units in Villages I and II, as well as 24.3 acres of mixed-use development in Village II. Subsequently, the approved final maps for Villages I and II included only 806 residential units and no mixed-use area.

Therefore, the certified 2005 VAF EIR analyzed the impact of trips from 296 residential units and 24.3 acres of mixed-use development beyond what is currently included in the approved final maps for Villages I and II. As a result, the VAF project as originally approved and studied under CEQA can accommodate additional units within the trip generation budget already studied for Villages I and II.

Trip Generation Comparison
The land uses proposed by the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development, and Parkside Project are different than those that were proposed and studied for VAF Villages I and II under the VAF EIR. However, a comparison of the trip generation shows that the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development (located east of Village II), and proposed Parkside Project, would generally generate less trips than the land uses studied for VAF Villages I, II under the VAF EIR.

The VAF EIR project description included development of 204 low-medium density units and 628 high density units in Village I and 270 low-medium density units with a 24.3-acre mixed-use lot (assumed to be 77% commercial use with half the intensity of typical commercial use in Appendix 3 of the VAF EIR)in Village II. The previously approved Villages I, and II trip generation was obtained from Chapter 4 of the VAF EIR Appendix 3: Traffic Analysis for The Villages at Fairfield (TJKM, February 4, 2005).

Currently proposed build-out of Village I includes 432 single-family dwelling units and currently proposed build-out of Village II includes 374 single-family dwelling units. The currently proposed Lago Vista development, which is an extension of Village II, includes 151 single-family dwelling units and 224 condominium/duplex dwelling units. The currently proposed Parkside Project includes 76 single-family dwelling units. Trip generation for the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development, and Parkside Project was estimated using industry standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition trip generation rates.

Table 5 summarizes the trip generation comparison of the land uses studied for VAF Villages I and II under the VAF EIR (VAF EIR Conditions) and the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development, and Parkside Project (Currently Proposed Conditions).

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 15 of 17 Table 5. VAF Villages I and II EIR vs Currently Proposed Trip Generation Comparison Location Description Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
In Out Total In Out Total

VAF EIR
Conditions1
Village I 204 Low-Med Density Units,
628 High Density Units 6,115 89 384 473 393 203 596
Village II 270 Low-Med Density Units,

24.3 Acres Mixed-Use 6,978 115 193 308 359 297 656
Total 13,093 204 577 781 752 500 1,252
Currently
Proposed
Conditions2
Village I 432 Single-Family Detached
DU3
3,878 71 211 282 248 145 393
Village II 374 Single-Family Detached
DU 3,396 62 185 247 216 127 343
Lago Vista
151 Single-Family Detached
DU, 224 Single-Family
Attached (Duplex) DU
3,130 55 164 219 169 107 276
Parkside 76 Single-Family Detached
DU 784 15 43 58 49 28 77
Total 11,188 203 603 806 682 407 1,089
Difference (EIR – Final Buildout) 1,905 1 -26 -25 70 93 163 Notes:
1 Source: Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report, Table 4-6 and VAF EIR Appendix 3: Traffic Analysis for The Villages at Fairfield (TJKM, February 4, 2005), Tables IX and X.. The VAF EIR trip generation is based on rates found in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition.
2 Trip rates based on fitted curve equations for the proposed land use consistent with information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition
3DU = Dwelling Units
As shown in Table 5, the Currently Proposed Conditions of Village I and Village II, with the addition of the proposed Lago Vista development and Parkside Project trips would generate 1,905 fewer daily trips, 25 more AM peak hour trips, and 163 fewer PM peak hour trips than the VAF EIR Conditions trip generation for Villages I and II.

The Currently Proposed Conditions of VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development, and Parkside Project have similar access points to the surrounding local roadway network as the VAF EIR Conditions project layouts did, including direct access to Clay Bank Road and Manual Campos Parkway. The similar access points means that traffic generated by the combined current VAF Village I, Village II, Lago Vista development, and Parkside Project would generally distribute to study intersections similar to the project distribution assumed in the VAF EIR.

Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 25 more AM peak hour trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in AM peak hour trips would not be large enough to affect traffic operations at nearby intersections or result in new traffic impacts or mitigations beyond those studied in the VAF EIR.

Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 163 less PM peak hour trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in PM peak hour trips means that PM traffic operations at nearby intersections would be the same or better than operations studied in the VAF EIR. Currently Proposed Conditions are estimated to generate 1,905 less daily trips than VAF EIR conditions. The slight difference in daily trips means that VMT generated by the Currently Proposed Conditions overall VAF development would be the same or less than studied in the VAF EIR.

Since the background land use and transportation context in the Project area has not changed substantially such that new environmental impacts are anticipated from development of the Project site, reliance on the approved EIR is generally acceptable as established in Concerned Dublin Citizens (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1318–1320 and Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) Cal.App.5th. These court decisions found that a change in the CEQA Guidelines is not new information triggering new CEQA analysis so long as the impacts of the project were considered in the initial EIR. Since VMT was included in the air quality analysis section of the approved VAF EIR, it can be argued that VMT was considered for development of the Project

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 16 of 17 site. Since the proposed Project site has a previously approved EIR that considered VMT, reliance on the approved EIR is acceptable and the Project would not be required to reevaluate transportation CEQA impacts.

VAF EIR Mitigation Measures at Offsite Intersections
The approved VAF EIR included implementation of several transportation mitigation measures at nearby intersections, including improvements at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway. Since the improvements identified by the VAF EIR have already been installed at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway, the intersection is projected to have sufficient capacity to serve VAF development trips, including trips from Lago Vista and Parkside.

4. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
The closest elementary school to the Project is Laurel Creek Elementary School, located approximately one (1) mile from the Project site. Students would walk or bike to this school primarily along Gulf Drive.

Sidewalks are present along the entire walking route to this school. There are no marked bike lanes on the route; however, travel to/from the school would take place on residential fronted streets where bikes could share the road.

The closest middle school to the Project is Grange Middle School, located approximately two (2) miles from the Project site. Students would walk or bike to this school primarily along Passion Lane, Horizon Circle, Clay Bank Road, Tabor Avenue, and Blossom Avenue. Sidewalks are present along the entire walking route to this school. Class II striped bike lanes are present on Tabor Avenue and on Clay Bank Road between Horizon Circle and Air Base Parkway, and a Class III marked bike route is present on Clay Bank Road between Quail Drive and Tabor Avenue. Travel on Horizon Circle and Passion Lane between Clay Bank Road and the Project site would take place on residential fronted streets where bikes could share the road.

The closest high school to the Project site is Fairfield High School, located approximately two (2) miles from the Project site. Students would walk or bike to this school primarily along Gulf Drive and Cement Hill Road.

Sidewalks are present along the entire walking route to this school. There are no marked bike lanes on Gulf Drive; however, travel to/from the school would take place on residential fronted streets where bikes could share the road. Class II striped bike lanes are present on Cement Hill Road between Gulf Road and the school.

As described above, no major gaps were identified for existing walking and biking facilities on routes between the Project site and local schools.

5. CONCLUSION
Project Description
The Project would develop up to 76 single-family detached dwelling units. The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local roadway connections to Passion Lane across from Hideaway Lane and Clementine Lane.

LOCAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Project Trip Generation
The proposed Project is anticipated to generate a total of 784 daily trips, 58 AM peak hour trips (15 inbound and 43 outbound), and 77 PM peak hour trips (49 inbound and 28 outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions.

Intersection LOS and Queueing Analysis
The following four (4) existing intersections were evaluated for LOS and queueing:

1. Clay Bank Road & Manuel Campos Parkway/Cement Hill Road

2. Clay Bank Road & Gulf Drive

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis 17 of 17

3. Clay Bank Road & Horizon Road/Horizon Circle (South)

4. Portland Drive & Cement Hill Road/Manual Campos Parkway All study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS under Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions. All queues are projected to fit within storage except for the westbound left-turn queue at Clay Bank Road & Horizon Road/Horizon Circle, which would exceed storage during the AM peak hour under Existing Plus Background and Existing Plus Background Plus Project conditions. A potential improvement at the Clay Bank Road & Horizon Road/Horizon Circle intersection could be to re-stripe the westbound approach to include a left-turn lane and shared left-through-right-turn lane and implement split phasing for the westbound and eastbound approaches.

Site Access and Internal Circulation
The Project would gain access to the existing roadway network via new local road extensions of Hideaway Lane and Clementine Lane. Internal circulation of the site would be provided by new local residential streets.

The new residential streets would typically be 46 feet wide including one travel lane in each direction, onstreet parking, curb, gutter, and sidewalks. There would be one (1) cul-de-sac on the south side of the project to be designed consistent with City standards.

CEQA TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
Multimodal Facilities
The Project residential streets would include new sidewalks on both sides of the road which would serve Project residents. The increase in pedestrian, bicycle, and transit demand from the Project is not projected to put existing facilities over capacity or adversely affect existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities in a way that would discourage their use. The Project would not result in unsafe conditions for bicyclists or pedestrians or result in unsafe bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle conflicts. The Project would remain generally consistent with multimodal facilities studied in the VAF EIR for Village I.

VMT Policy Analysis
The Currently Proposed Conditions of Village I, Village II, and Lago Vista development with the addition of the proposed Parkside Project trips would generate 1,905 fewer daily trips, 25 more AM peak hour trips, and 163 fewer PM peak hour trips than the VAF EIR Conditions trip generation for Villages I and II. The slight difference in AM peak hour trips would not be large enough to affect traffic operations at nearby intersections or result in new traffic impacts or mitigations beyond those studied in the VAF EIR. Therefore the Parkside Project would not be projected to result in any new transportation impacts beyond those studied in the VAF EIR. Since the proposed Project site has a previously approved EIR that considered VMT, and the background land use and transportation context in the Project area has not changed substantially such that new environmental impacts are anticipated from development of the Project site, reliance on the approved EIR is acceptable and the Project would not be required to reevaluate transportation CEQA impacts.

The approved VAF EIR included implementation of several transportation mitigation measures at nearby intersections, including improvements at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway. Since the improvements identified by the VAF EIR have already been installed at the intersection of Clay Bank Road and Air Base Parkway, the intersection is projected to have sufficient capacity to serve VAF development trips, including trips from Lago Vista and Parkside.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
The Project is located such that no major gaps were identified for existing walking and biking facilities on routes between the Project site and local schools.

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT A

PROJECT SITE PLAN

EXHIBIT A

A/C
PAD
PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C

A/C PAD A/C PAD
A/C

PAD A/C PAD A/C PAD
A/C

PAD PAD

A/C PAD
A/C

A/C PAD

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD
PAD

A/C PAD A/C
PADA/C

PADA/C PAD

A/C PAD
A/C
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD
A/C

PAD A/C PAD

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD A/C PAD PAD A/C PAD A/C PAD A/C PAD A/C
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD A/C PAD

A/C PAD PAD
A/C
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD
A/C

PAD PAD
A/C

A/C PAD A/C PAD

A/C PAD
PAD
A/C

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C
PAD
PAD
A/C

A/C PAD
A/C
PAD
PAD
A/C
PAD
A/C
A/C
PAD

A/C PAD

A/C PAD A/C PAD

A/C PAD
PADA/C

A/C PAD

A/C PAD PAD A/C A/C PAD
LARA APN: 0170-331-011 TAGULAO APN: 0170-331-012
CHAN
APN:
0170-332-007
CRUZ
APN:
0170-332-008

AFICIAL
APN:
0170-333-006
GRAHAM
APN:
0170-333-006
TAGUINOD APN: 0170-334-007 GUNDRAN APN: 0170-334-008
RAMOS APN: 0170-351-013 AUGUSTIN APN: 0170-351-014
CABRERA APN: 0170-352-013 ESLAVA APN: 0170-351-014

FAIRFIELD SUISUN

SCHOOL DISTRICT
APN: 0170-010-051
CITY OF FAIRFIELD APN: 0170-010-019
KUMLER 0170-332-040 APN:

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD
29 30
28 21
25 23
24 27
19 31
18 47
44 49
20 22
46 26
48 35
36 65
63 33
1 2
3 74
75 71
72 73
70 69
16 14
13 12
11 10
7 8
9 53
62 54
76 55
57 58
50 59
51 60
52 61
34 56
67 68
66 43
45 42
64 15
32 17
38 37
6 40
41 4
5 39

COURT A

STREET B

STREET C STREET B

STREET B

STREET A

STREET C

LOT A WATER QUALITY

0.35± AC.

PROJECT
SITE
NORTH

LOCATION MAP
JUNE 2025

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD - PARKSIDE

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME 3875 HOPYARD ROAD STE 345 TEL 925.847.1556 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 FAX 925.847.1557
200
100
50 0
NORTH
REVISED JULY 3, 2025

SITE PLAN

HOUSING SUMMARY
PLAN 1
PLAN 2
PLAN 3
UNIT COUNT HOUSE SIZE (SQ. FT.)
19 19
19 1,654
2,062
2,129
TOTAL 76 -

PARKING SPACE TYPE
STREET
DRIVEWAY*
GARAGE
UNIT
NO. OF SPACE/
SPACES
83 1.1
114 1.5
152 2.0
TOTAL 349 4.6 SPACES/UNIT

PARKING SUMMARY

50.0'x54.5' PERCENT MIX*
25%
25%
25%
100%
PLAN 4 19 2,195 25%
*HOUSE PLANS 1 AND 4 CONTAIN A ONE-CAR DRIVEWAY SPACE. PLANS 2 AND 3 CONTAIN TWO-CAR DRIVEWAY SPACES.
*HOUSE PLAN MIX IS APPROXIMATE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 3 OF 9

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT B

VAF ILLUSTRATIVE MAP

EXHIBIT A

Project Site Lago Vista
Village I Lot
2 Remainder
Village II Lot
4 Remainder
Village II Lot
3 Remainder

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT C

TRAFFIC COUNTS

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:

0.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.5 1 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 23 2 22 0 2 5 0 0 0 42 30 0 30 81 0 0 237
7:15 AM 30 0 25 0 2 4 5 0 2 38 40 0 69 77 2 0 294
7:30 AM 45 0 33 0 4 3 2 0 3 46 26 2 58 91 2 0 315
7:45 AM 45 4 30 0 4 5 0 0 1 48 33 1 46 81 3 0 301
8:00 AM 53 2 31 0 4 4 3 0 1 57 34 1 47 87 2 0 326
8:15 AM 23 1 32 0 5 5 1 0 1 55 29 0 42 63 3 0 260
8:30 AM 31 0 27 0 2 2 0 0 2 38 30 0 45 68 1 0 246
8:45 AM 25 4 30 0 1 4 3 0 2 50 24 1 44 63 2 0 253

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 275 13 230 0 24 32 14 0 12 374 246 5 381 611 15 0 2232 APPROACH %'s : 53.09% 2.51% 44.40% 0.00% 34.29% 45.71% 20.00% 0.00% 1.88% 58.71% 38.62% 0.78% 37.84% 60.68% 1.49% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 173 6 119 0 14 16 10 0 7 189 133 4 220 336 9 0 1236 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.816 0.375 0.902 0.000 0.875 0.800 0.500 0.000 0.583 0.829 0.831 0.500 0.797 0.923 0.750 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU

0.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.5 1 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 44 3 68 0 5 5 1 0 0 60 46 0 36 73 4 0 345
4:15 PM 44 8 82 0 2 1 0 0 1 54 46 0 57 56 2 0 353
4:30 PM 30 7 74 0 1 1 0 0 0 70 35 0 44 50 4 0 316
4:45 PM 39 3 63 0 4 4 0 0 2 72 37 0 44 52 0 0 320
5:00 PM 29 6 71 0 1 5 0 0 0 82 41 0 43 70 3 0 351
5:15 PM 42 2 64 0 1 1 1 0 0 74 47 0 38 44 7 0 321
5:30 PM 26 3 81 0 0 1 0 0 0 73 39 0 43 38 3 0 307
5:45 PM 24 5 59 0 3 4 0 0 1 64 36 0 39 55 1 0 291

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 278 37 562 0 17 22 2 0 4 549 327 0 344 438 24 0 2604 APPROACH %'s : 31.70% 4.22% 64.08% 0.00% 41.46% 53.66% 4.88% 0.00% 0.45% 62.39% 37.16% 0.00% 42.68% 54.34% 2.98% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:15 PM 290 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 142 24 290 0 8 11 0 0 3 278 159 0 188 228 9 0 1340 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.807 0.750 0.884 0.000 0.500 0.550 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.848 0.864 0.000 0.825 0.814 0.563 0.000 Data - Totals
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Manuel Campos Pkwy Manuel Campos Pkwy

0.866 0.909 0.895 0.935
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
24-080057-001
3/14/2024
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM

0.949 0.851 0.594 0.894 0.916
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

0.948

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:

0.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.5 1 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU

0.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.5 1 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 4:15 PM 290 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Manuel Campos Pkwy Manuel Campos Pkwy AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
24-080057-001
3/14/2024
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy Project ID:

City: Fairfield Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00%
PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 37 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 4
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 100.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 4:15 PM 287 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.250
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Manuel Campos Pkwy Manuel Campos Pkwy 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
24-080057-001
3/14/2024

0.375 0.500 0.250
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM

0.250 0.250

EXHIBIT A

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-080057-001 Day:

City: Fairfield Date:

AM 10 16 14 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 11 8 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 1 0 0.5 9 0 9
1 228 0 336
4 0 0 0 0.5 188 0 220
7 0 3 0.3 TEV 1236 0 1340 0 0 0 0
189 0 278 0.3 PHF 0.95 0.95
133 0 159 0.3 0 0.5 0.5 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 142 24 290 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 173 6 119 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 369

NORTHBOUND
Clay Bank Rd
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
NONE
576 0 322
Totals (AM) 358 Total Bikes (AM) Manuel Campos Pkwy EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Manuel Campos Pkwy 523 0 370

CONTROL
Signalized
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 36
Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Clay Bank Rd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 3/14/2024 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 22 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
0 0
0 1
0 0
00 000 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
00 010 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
9 228
159 188
278
3 0118 142 24290
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
9 336
133 220
189
7 101614 173
6119

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 5 44 7 0 5 48 2 0 4 0 3 0 7 0 9 0 134
7:15 AM 3 43 6 0 3 63 11 0 7 2 12 0 15 3 9 0 177
7:30 AM 5 48 2 0 2 80 8 0 9 1 7 0 14 8 13 0 197
7:45 AM 15 80 6 1 6 68 10 0 7 9 8 0 18 17 6 0 251
8:00 AM 7 61 10 2 8 73 4 0 8 18 6 0 10 3 7 0 217
8:15 AM 7 59 8 0 3 58 5 0 9 2 10 0 14 3 6 0 184
8:30 AM 8 50 9 2 7 69 6 0 9 3 8 0 9 1 7 0 188
8:45 AM 5 54 3 0 4 55 4 1 7 6 6 0 3 1 8 0 157

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 55 439 51 5 38 514 50 1 60 41 60 0 90 36 65 0 1505 APPROACH %'s : 10.00% 79.82% 9.27% 0.91% 6.30% 85.24% 8.29% 0.17% 37.27% 25.47% 37.27% 0.00% 47.12% 18.85% 34.03% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 34 248 26 3 19 279 27 0 33 30 31 0 56 31 32 0 849 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.567 0.775 0.650 0.375 0.594 0.872 0.675 0.000 0.917 0.417 0.775 0.000 0.778 0.456 0.615 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 13 74 10 3 7 70 17 0 9 3 5 0 6 3 4 0 224
4:15 PM 10 73 13 5 15 62 11 0 8 3 7 0 8 2 3 0 220
4:30 PM 11 72 10 2 6 59 8 1 7 4 7 0 2 3 1 0 193
4:45 PM 16 78 3 0 12 68 11 0 4 2 6 0 10 4 4 0 218
5:00 PM 11 89 11 2 10 72 5 1 6 3 4 0 7 3 8 0 232
5:15 PM 16 76 11 2 6 70 10 0 7 0 8 0 7 4 4 0 221
5:30 PM 11 72 13 0 7 50 9 1 8 2 2 0 6 1 8 0 190
5:45 PM 10 82 8 2 7 56 5 0 5 3 5 0 14 1 3 0 201

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 98 616 79 16 70 507 76 3 54 20 44 0 60 21 35 0 1699 APPROACH %'s : 12.11% 76.14% 9.77% 1.98% 10.67% 77.29% 11.59% 0.46% 45.76% 16.95% 37.29% 0.00% 51.72% 18.10% 30.17% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 54 315 35 6 34 269 34 2 24 9 25 0 26 14 17 0 864 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.844 0.885 0.795 0.750 0.708 0.934 0.773 0.500 0.857 0.563 0.781 0.000 0.650 0.875 0.531 0.000 Data - Totals
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Gulf Dr Gulf Dr

0.762 0.903 0.734 0.726
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-001
2/11/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.931 0.907 0.931 0.806 0.792
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.846

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Gulf Dr Gulf Dr
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-001
2/11/2025
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.500 0.250 0.250
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr Project ID:

City: Fairfield Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 1 7
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 80.00% 20.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 5
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.375 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 6
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 288 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Gulf Dr Gulf Dr

0.250 0.500
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
25-080051-001
2/11/2025

0.250 0.250
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.625

EXHIBIT A

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-080051-001 Day:

City: Fairfield Date:

AM 27 279 19 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 34 269 34 2 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0 0 17 0 32
1 14 0 31
0 0 0 0 1 26 0 56
33 0 24 1 TEV 849 0 864 0 0 0 0
30 0 9 1 PHF 0.85 0.93
31 0 25 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 6 54 315 35 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 3 34 248 26 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 358
Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Clay Bank Rd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/11/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 313 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS NONE 78 0 75
Totals (AM) 326 Total Bikes (AM) Gulf Dr EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Gulf Dr 92 0 102

CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 369

NORTHBOUND
Clay Bank Rd
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
0 0
1 2
0 3
00 100 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
010
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
17 14
25 26
9 24 34269 34 54315 35
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
32 31
31 56
30 33 27279 19 34248 26

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 6 57 9 2 2 71 10 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 4 0 172
7:15 AM 10 58 6 2 3 120 8 0 2 0 0 0 32 0 4 0 245
7:30 AM 11 66 1 5 6 148 12 2 4 0 2 0 50 1 7 0 315
7:45 AM 22 99 11 5 8 134 8 0 6 0 0 0 27 2 22 0 344
8:00 AM 15 93 12 7 16 132 14 2 8 0 5 0 23 0 4 0 331
8:15 AM 13 70 14 2 13 122 7 0 6 1 4 0 18 1 9 0 280
8:30 AM 10 88 17 4 2 129 10 1 3 1 4 0 24 0 1 0 294
8:45 AM 18 77 10 2 4 108 9 4 8 0 3 0 19 1 3 0 266

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 105 608 80 29 54 964 78 9 38 2 18 0 203 5 54 0 2247 APPROACH %'s : 12.77% 73.97% 9.73% 3.53% 4.89% 87.24% 7.06% 0.81% 65.52% 3.45% 31.03% 0.00% 77.48% 1.91% 20.61% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 61 328 38 19 43 536 41 4 24 1 11 0 118 4 42 0 1270 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.693 0.828 0.679 0.679 0.672 0.905 0.732 0.500 0.750 0.250 0.550 0.000 0.590 0.500 0.477 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 10 111 8 1 5 94 8 1 17 0 6 0 19 0 3 0 283
4:15 PM 8 119 24 3 6 79 4 0 10 1 1 0 7 0 5 0 267
4:30 PM 12 111 21 3 5 87 9 1 12 2 2 0 17 1 1 0 284
4:45 PM 23 104 22 3 4 95 9 3 17 4 6 0 13 1 3 0 307
5:00 PM 20 109 24 4 10 85 15 1 21 2 6 0 10 0 4 0 311
5:15 PM 8 114 23 3 11 98 8 1 11 2 8 0 18 0 3 0 308
5:30 PM 17 113 15 6 8 92 5 0 8 0 3 0 20 0 2 0 289
5:45 PM 15 96 34 4 3 83 11 1 8 2 3 0 11 1 1 0 273

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 113 877 171 27 52 713 69 8 104 13 35 0 115 3 22 0 2322 APPROACH %'s : 9.51% 73.82% 14.39% 2.27% 6.18% 84.68% 8.19% 0.95% 68.42% 8.55% 23.03% 0.00% 82.14% 2.14% 15.71% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 68 440 84 16 33 370 37 5 57 8 23 0 61 1 12 0 1215 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.739 0.965 0.875 0.667 0.750 0.944 0.617 0.417 0.679 0.500 0.719 0.000 0.763 0.250 0.750 0.000 Data - Totals
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr

0.814 0.929 0.692 0.707
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-002
2/11/2025
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.977 0.968 0.943 0.759 0.841
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.923

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr
City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.5 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 6
APPROACH %'s : 66.67% 0.00% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr

0.250
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-002
2/11/2025
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.500 0.500 0.250 0.250
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.250

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr Project ID:

City: Fairfield Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4
7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 6
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 4:45 PM 289 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr

0.250
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
25-080051-002
2/11/2025

0.500 0.500
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM

0.250

EXHIBIT A

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-080051-002 Day:

City: Fairfield Date:

AM 41 536 43 4 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 37 370 33 5 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0 0.5 12 0 42

0.5 1 0 4
0 0 0 0 1 61 0 118
24 0 57 1 TEV 1270 0 1215 0 0 0 0
1 0 8 0.5 PHF 0.92 0.98
11 0 23 0.5 0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 16 68 440 84 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 19 61 328 38 AM
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 514
Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Clay Bank Rd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/11/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 398 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS NONE 125 0 82
Totals (AM) 470 Total Bikes (AM) Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr EASTBOUND 106 0 106 WESTBOUND Horizon Cir/Horizon Dr CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 684

NORTHBOUND
Clay Bank Rd
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
0 0
0 2
0 0
00 200 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
000
200
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
010
000
12 1
23 61
8 57 37370 33 68440 84
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
42 4
11 118
1 24 41536 43 61328 38

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Portland Dr & Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:

0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 5 0 4 115 0 0 193
7:15 AM 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 4 0 2 162 0 0 245
7:30 AM 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 3 0 10 154 0 0 240
7:45 AM 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 3 0 4 136 0 0 237
8:00 AM 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 3 0 8 141 0 0 236
8:15 AM 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 5 0 5 130 0 0 258
8:30 AM 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 4 0 5 120 0 0 213
8:45 AM 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 2 0 6 117 0 0 214

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 40 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 583 29 0 44 1075 0 0 1836 APPROACH %'s : 38.10% 0.00% 61.90% 0.00% 0.00% 95.26% 4.74% 0.00% 3.93% 96.07% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 19 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 314 14 0 27 561 0 0 971 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.528 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.748 0.700 0.000 0.675 0.911 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU

0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 4 0 4 107 0 0 255
4:15 PM 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 3 0 4 99 0 0 248
4:30 PM 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 4 0 5 96 0 1 243
4:45 PM 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 5 0 10 74 0 0 230
5:00 PM 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 4 0 11 118 0 0 286
5:15 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 7 0 5 90 0 0 247
5:30 PM 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 5 0 4 74 0 0 265
5:45 PM 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 4 0 11 83 0 0 238

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 19 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 1108 36 0 54 741 0 1 2012 APPROACH %'s : 26.39% 0.00% 73.61% 0.00% 0.00% 96.85% 3.15% 0.00% 6.78% 93.09% 0.00% 0.13% PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 8 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 590 20 0 31 365 0 0 1036 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.667 0.000 0.611 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.843 0.714 0.000 0.705 0.773 0.000 0.000 Data - Totals
Portland Dr Portland Dr Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy

0.859 0.745 0.896
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-003
2/11/2025
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

0.906 0.625 0.847 0.767
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.941

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Portland Dr & Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy City: Fairfield Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:

0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU

0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Portland Dr Portland Dr Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
25-080051-003
2/11/2025
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

EXHIBIT A

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Portland Dr & Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy Project ID:

City: Fairfield Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 7:30 AM 38 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR :

Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 5:00 PM 290 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HR FACTOR :

Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Portland Dr Portland Dr Cement Hill Rd/Manuel
Campos Pkwy
Cement Hill Rd/Manuel
Campos Pkwy
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
25-080051-003
2/11/2025
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM

EXHIBIT A

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-080051-003 Day:

City: Fairfield Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 365 0 561
0 0 0 0 0 31 0 27
0 0 0 0 TEV 971 0 1036 0 0 0 0
314 0 590 0.5 PHF 0.94 0.91
14 0 20 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 8 0 22 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 19 0 36 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0
Portland Dr & Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Portland Dr Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 2/11/2025 PEAK HOURS 4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS NONE 612 0 350
Totals (AM) 51 Total Bikes (AM) Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND Cement Hill Rd/Manuel Campos Pkwy 580 0 373

CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 41

NORTHBOUND
Portland Dr
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM

NOON PMNOON AMAMNOON PM PMNOON AMAMNOON PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 365
20 31
590
0 000
8022
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 561
14 27
314
0 000 19
036

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT D

BACKGROUND TRIP GENERATION

EXHIBIT A

Background Project Trip Generations
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 9 DU2 110 2 6 8 6 4 10 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 52 DU2 553 10 31 41 34 20 54 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 33 DU2 364 7 20 27 22 13 35 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 49 DU2 523 10 29 39 32 19 51 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 77 DU2 793 15 44 59 49 29 78 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 58 DU2 611 11 34 45 38 22 60 In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 150 DU 1,465 27 81 108 91 54 145 Single-Family Attached Housing (Duplex) 215 226 DU 1,672 28 84 112 78 54 132 3,137 55 165 220 169 108 277
Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1
Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Village II Lot 4 Remainder - as of 05/15/2024
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 Village I Lot 2 Remainder - as of 05/15/2024
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 Village I Lot 2 Remainder - as of 02/24/2025
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Village II Lot 3 Remainder - as of 02/24/2025
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Village II Lot 4 Remainder - as of 02/24/2025
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1 AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1 Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Land Use Quantity Units
Lago Vista
AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1
ITE Code Daily1
Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Village II Lot 3 Remainder - as of 05/15/2024
Land Use ITE Code Quantity Units Daily1
Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations or average rates. 2DU = Dwelling Units
Total
\\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\1000-s\1135-Villages_at_Faifield\VAF-OA\Traffic\Parkside\Analysis\VAF_Parkside_Trip_Gen_20250327.xlsx

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT E
SYNCHRO HCM 7

TH EDITION LOS REPORTS

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 190 146 229 345 9 215 6 133 14 16 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 190 146 229 345 9 215 6 133 14 16 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 200 154 241 363 9 226 6 140 15 17 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 236 281 206 293 621 15 297 317 269 309 178 115 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1958 1431 1781 3543 88 1781 1870 1585 1781 1061 686 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 181 173 241 182 190 226 6 140 15 0 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1613 1781 1777 1854 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1747 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 5.9 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.4 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 5.9 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.4 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 236 255 232 293 312 325 297 317 269 309 0 294 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.71 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.59 0.76 0.02 0.52 0.05 0.00 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 875 1164 1056 875 1164 1215 875 1133 960 875 0 1087 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.1 24.9 25.1 24.7 23.1 23.1 24.3 21.1 23.1 21.0 0.0 21.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.3 1.8 2.2 0.6 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 2.3 2.2 3.1 2.2 2.3 3.0 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.2 26.3 26.9 26.9 23.8 23.8 25.8 21.1 23.7 21.1 0.0 21.5 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 366 613 372 43
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 25.0 24.9 21.4
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 14.6 15.3 15.4 13.9 16.5 15.2 15.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 8.3 9.4 2.8 2.4 7.8 2.4 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.2
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 33 30 31 61 31 32 37 289 28 22 338 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 33 30 31 61 31 32 37 289 28 22 338 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 39 35 36 72 36 38 44 340 33 26 398 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 169 80 82 184 86 91 87 941 91 56 890 80
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 844 868 1781 833 879 1781 3275 316 1781 3295 297 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 39 0 71 72 0 74 44 184 189 26 214 220 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1712 1781 0 1712 1781 1777 1814 1781 1777 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.0 1.5 0.9 3.1 3.2 0.5 3.8 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.0 1.5 0.9 3.1 3.2 0.5 3.8 3.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 0 162 184 0 177 87 511 521 56 480 490 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.44 0.39 0.00 0.42 0.51 0.36 0.36 0.46 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1683 0 1617 1683 0 1617 935 1632 1666 935 1632 1666 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 0.0 16.3 16.0 0.0 16.0 17.7 10.8 10.8 18.1 11.5 11.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 1.8 1.4 0.0 1.6 4.5 0.4 0.4 5.8 0.6 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.3 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.6 0.0 18.1 17.3 0.0 17.6 22.2 11.2 11.2 23.9 12.2 12.2 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 110 146 417 460
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 17.5 12.4 12.9
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 6.5 14.9 8.5 5.8 15.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 20.0 35.0 36.0 20.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.9 5.8 3.5 2.5 5.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.1 2.9 0.6 0.0 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.7
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 24 1 11 277 4 89 80 329 90 63 540 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 24 1 11 277 4 89 80 329 90 63 540 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 1 12 301 4 97 87 358 98 68 587 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 54 11 138 375 17 419 125 767 207 109 896 69
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 123 1472 1781 63 1532 1781 2766 747 1781 3339 256 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 13 301 0 101 87 228 228 68 312 320 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1595 1781 0 1595 1781 1777 1736 1781 1777 1818 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.0 0.4 8.1 0.0 2.5 2.4 5.4 5.5 1.9 7.8 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.4 8.1 0.0 2.5 2.4 5.4 5.5 1.9 7.8 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 54 0 149 375 0 436 125 493 481 109 477 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.09 0.80 0.00 0.23 0.70 0.46 0.47 0.63 0.65 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 708 0 1047 708 0 983 708 1166 1139 248 883 904 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.0 0.0 20.8 18.9 0.0 14.2 22.9 15.1 15.1 23.0 16.3 16.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 0.0 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.3 6.9 0.7 0.7 5.8 1.5 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.9 0.9 3.1 3.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.5 0.0 21.1 22.9 0.0 14.4 29.7 15.8 15.8 28.8 17.9 17.8 LnGrp LOS C C C B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 39 402 543 700
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.4 20.8 18.0 18.9
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.8 9.3 8.1 18.1 5.7 18.4 7.7 18.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 33.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 31.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 2.4 4.4 9.9 2.7 4.5 3.9 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.3
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 323 14 28 564 19 39
Future Volume (veh/h) 323 14 28 564 19 39
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 344 15 30 600 20 41
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 827 36 67 1788 37 76
Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.50 0.07 0.07
Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 151 1781 3647 532 1090
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 176 183 30 600 62 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1843 1781 1777 1648 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 2.1 0.4 2.6 0.9 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 2.1 0.4 2.6 0.9 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.08 1.00 0.32 0.66
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 424 440 67 1788 115 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.42 0.45 0.34 0.54 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2785 2889 3280 5569 1937 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.2 8.2 12.0 3.8 11.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.6 4.6 0.1 3.9 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.9 8.8 16.7 3.9 15.4 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 359 630 62
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.9 4.5 15.4
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 11.9 18.6 6.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.0 40.0 40.0 30.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 4.1 4.6 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.9 4.0 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.6
HCM 7th LOS A

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 294 198 200 229 9 166 24 312 9 11 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 294 198 200 229 9 166 24 312 9 11 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 309 208 211 241 9 175 25 328 9 12 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 199 374 246 255 747 28 250 443 375 257 438 0 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2055 1349 1781 3494 130 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 266 251 211 122 128 175 25 328 9 12 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1627 1781 1777 1847 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 10.5 10.8 8.4 4.2 4.2 6.8 0.8 14.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 10.5 10.8 8.4 4.2 4.2 6.8 0.8 14.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 199 324 296 255 380 395 250 443 375 257 438 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.82 0.85 0.83 0.32 0.32 0.70 0.06 0.88 0.03 0.03 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 736 978 896 736 978 1017 736 953 805 736 978 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.7 28.6 28.7 30.2 24.1 24.1 29.8 21.4 26.7 26.7 21.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.2 4.1 3.5 1.6 1.7 2.9 0.3 5.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 28.7 30.6 31.3 32.8 24.3 24.3 31.1 21.5 29.3 26.7 21.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 520 461 528 21
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.9 28.2 29.5 23.7
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 19.0 15.3 22.1 13.9 21.3 15.1 22.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 12.8 8.8 2.4 2.1 6.2 2.3 16.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 29.5
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 9 25 29 14 23 60 448 40 39 337 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 9 25 29 14 23 60 448 40 39 337 33 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 10 27 31 15 25 65 482 43 42 362 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 125 31 84 126 45 74 118 992 88 85 921 88
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 447 1206 1781 630 1051 1781 3301 294 1781 3268 314 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 37 31 0 40 65 259 266 42 196 201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1653 1781 0 1681 1781 1777 1818 1781 1777 1804 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.8 1.3 4.3 4.3 0.8 3.2 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.8 1.3 4.3 4.3 0.8 3.2 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 125 0 116 126 0 119 118 534 546 85 501 508 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.00 0.32 0.25 0.00 0.34 0.55 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1782 0 1654 1782 0 1682 990 1728 1768 990 1728 1755 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.9 0.0 15.9 15.8 0.0 15.9 16.3 10.3 10.3 16.7 10.4 10.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.0 0.0 1.7 3.9 0.7 0.7 4.4 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.4 1.1 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.0 0.0 17.5 16.8 0.0 17.6 20.2 11.0 11.0 21.1 10.9 10.9 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 70 71 590 439
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.3 17.2 12.0 11.9
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 7.0 14.7 7.1 6.3 15.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 20.0 35.0 36.0 20.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 3.3 5.2 2.8 2.8 6.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.1 2.6 0.3 0.1 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.6
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 8 23 164 1 42 84 444 248 86 373 37 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 8 23 164 1 42 84 444 248 86 373 37 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 58 8 23 167 1 43 86 453 253 88 381 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 101 38 109 223 6 244 129 712 395 131 1057 105 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 426 1224 1781 36 1554 1781 2205 1223 1781 3264 324 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 0 31 167 0 44 86 364 342 88 206 213 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1650 1781 0 1591 1781 1777 1650 1781 1777 1811 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 0.8 4.2 0.0 1.1 2.2 8.1 8.2 2.2 4.1 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.8 4.2 0.0 1.1 2.2 8.1 8.2 2.2 4.1 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.18
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 0 146 223 0 250 129 574 533 131 576 587 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.21 0.75 0.00 0.18 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.36 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 772 0 1180 772 0 1068 772 1270 1180 270 962 981 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.2 0.0 19.5 19.5 0.0 16.9 20.9 13.3 13.3 20.9 11.9 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.0 0.0 0.7 5.0 0.0 0.3 5.8 1.2 1.3 5.9 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.4 1.0 2.7 2.6 1.1 1.5 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 26.2 0.0 20.2 24.5 0.0 17.2 26.7 14.5 14.6 26.8 12.3 12.3 LnGrp LOS C C C B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 89 211 792 507
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.2 23.0 15.9 14.8
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 8.7 7.9 19.6 6.8 11.8 8.0 19.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 33.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 31.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 2.8 4.2 6.2 3.5 3.1 4.2 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.1 0.2 2.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 4.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 16.9
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 595 20 34 429 9 24
Future Volume (veh/h) 595 20 34 429 9 24
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 654 22 37 471 10 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1230 41 79 2096 20 51
Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.59 0.04 0.04
Sat Flow, veh/h 3602 118 1781 3647 443 1153
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 345 37 471 37 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1849 1781 1777 1641 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 4.4 0.6 1.9 0.7 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 4.4 0.6 1.9 0.7 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.06 1.00 0.27 0.70
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 623 648 79 2096 73 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.53 0.47 0.22 0.51 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2387 2484 2812 4774 1653 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.7 7.7 13.9 2.9 13.9 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.7 4.3 0.1 5.4 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.4 8.4 18.2 2.9 19.3 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 676 508 37
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.4 4.1 19.3
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 16.2 23.4 6.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.0 40.0 40.0 30.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 6.4 3.9 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.0 3.0 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.9
HCM 7th LOS A

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 190 148 229 345 9 222 6 133 14 16 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 190 148 229 345 9 222 6 133 14 16 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 200 156 241 363 9 234 6 140 15 17 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 236 281 208 293 624 15 297 317 268 309 178 115 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1947 1441 1781 3543 88 1781 1870 1585 1781 1061 686 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 182 174 241 182 190 234 6 140 15 0 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1611 1781 1777 1854 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1747 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 6.0 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.7 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 6.0 6.3 8.0 5.7 5.8 7.7 0.2 4.9 0.4 0.0 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 236 256 232 293 313 327 297 317 268 309 0 293 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.71 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.58 0.79 0.02 0.52 0.05 0.00 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 874 1163 1054 874 1163 1214 874 1132 960 874 0 1086 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.2 24.9 25.1 24.7 23.1 23.1 24.4 21.2 23.1 21.1 0.0 21.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.4 1.8 2.2 0.6 0.6 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 2.3 2.3 3.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.2 26.3 26.9 26.9 23.7 23.7 26.2 21.2 23.7 21.1 0.0 21.6 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 368 613 380 43
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 25.0 25.2 21.4
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 14.6 15.3 15.4 13.9 16.6 15.2 15.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 8.3 9.7 2.8 2.4 7.8 2.4 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.3
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 33 30 31 70 31 39 37 289 31 24 338 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 33 30 31 70 31 39 37 289 31 24 338 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 39 35 36 82 36 46 44 340 36 28 398 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 169 80 82 192 80 103 87 921 97 60 885 80
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 844 868 1781 746 953 1781 3245 341 1781 3295 297 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 39 0 71 82 0 82 44 185 191 28 214 220 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1712 1781 0 1699 1781 1777 1809 1781 1777 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.9 3.2 3.2 0.6 3.8 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.0 1.7 0.9 3.2 3.2 0.6 3.8 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 0 162 192 0 183 87 504 514 60 478 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.00 0.45 0.51 0.37 0.37 0.47 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1673 0 1608 1673 0 1596 930 1623 1652 930 1623 1657 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.1 0.0 16.4 16.0 0.0 16.0 17.8 11.0 11.0 18.2 11.6 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 1.7 4.5 0.4 0.4 5.6 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.3 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.8 0.0 18.2 17.5 0.0 17.7 22.3 11.4 11.4 23.7 12.3 12.3 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 110 164 420 462
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 17.6 12.6 13.0
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 6.5 14.9 8.7 5.9 15.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 20.0 35.0 36.0 20.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.9 5.9 3.7 2.6 5.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.1 2.9 0.7 0.0 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.9
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 24 1 11 290 4 89 80 335 95 63 559 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 24 1 11 290 4 89 80 335 95 63 559 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 1 12 315 4 97 87 364 103 68 608 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 54 11 135 388 18 428 123 771 215 107 912 67
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 123 1472 1781 63 1532 1781 2743 766 1781 3349 247 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 13 315 0 101 87 234 233 68 322 331 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1595 1781 0 1595 1781 1777 1732 1781 1777 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.0 0.4 8.7 0.0 2.5 2.5 5.6 5.8 1.9 8.3 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.4 8.7 0.0 2.5 2.5 5.6 5.8 1.9 8.3 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 54 0 147 388 0 446 123 499 487 107 484 496 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.09 0.81 0.00 0.23 0.71 0.47 0.48 0.63 0.67 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 691 0 1020 691 0 958 691 1137 1108 242 861 882 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 21.4 19.2 0.0 14.3 23.5 15.4 15.4 23.7 16.7 16.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 0.0 0.3 4.1 0.0 0.3 7.2 0.7 0.7 6.0 1.6 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 0.9 1.2 2.0 2.0 0.9 3.3 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 31.2 0.0 21.7 23.3 0.0 14.6 30.7 16.0 16.1 29.7 18.3 18.3 LnGrp LOS C C C B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 39 416 554 721
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 21.2 18.4 19.3
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.4 9.3 8.2 18.6 5.8 19.0 7.7 19.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 33.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 31.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 2.4 4.5 10.3 2.7 4.5 3.9 7.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.7
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 323 14 29 564 19 41
Future Volume (veh/h) 323 14 29 564 19 41
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 344 15 31 600 20 44
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 825 36 69 1786 37 80
Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.50 0.07 0.07
Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 151 1781 3647 506 1113
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 176 183 31 600 65 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1843 1781 1777 1645 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 2.2 0.4 2.6 1.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 2.2 0.4 2.6 1.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.08 1.00 0.31 0.68
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 423 438 69 1786 119 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.34 0.55 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2772 2875 3265 5544 1924 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.3 8.3 12.1 3.8 11.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.6 4.5 0.1 3.9 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.9 8.9 16.6 3.9 15.4 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 359 631 65
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.9 4.5 15.4
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 11.9 18.7 7.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.0 40.0 40.0 30.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 4.2 4.6 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.9 4.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.7
HCM 7th LOS A

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 294 205 200 229 9 170 24 312 9 11 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 294 205 200 229 9 170 24 312 9 11 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 309 216 211 241 9 179 25 328 9 12 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 198 373 254 255 758 28 249 443 374 256 438 0 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2021 1378 1781 3494 130 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 271 254 211 122 128 179 25 328 9 12 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1622 1781 1777 1847 1781 1870 1581 1781 1870 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 10.7 11.1 8.4 4.2 4.3 7.0 0.8 14.6 0.3 0.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 10.7 11.1 8.4 4.2 4.3 7.0 0.8 14.6 0.3 0.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 198 328 299 255 385 401 249 443 374 256 438 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.83 0.85 0.83 0.32 0.32 0.72 0.06 0.88 0.04 0.03 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 732 973 888 732 973 1011 732 947 801 732 973 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.9 28.6 28.8 30.4 24.1 24.1 30.1 21.6 26.8 26.9 21.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.3 4.1 3.5 1.6 1.7 3.0 0.3 5.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 28.9 30.7 31.4 33.0 24.2 24.2 31.5 21.6 29.5 26.9 21.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 528 461 532 21
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.0 28.3 29.8 23.9
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.3 19.3 15.3 22.2 13.9 21.6 15.1 22.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.1 * 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 40.0 30.0 * 38 30.0 40.0 30.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 13.1 9.0 2.4 2.1 6.3 2.3 16.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 29.7
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 9 25 35 14 27 60 448 50 46 337 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 9 25 35 14 27 60 448 50 46 337 33 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 10 27 38 15 29 65 482 54 49 362 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 124 31 84 138 44 85 118 941 105 96 913 88
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 447 1206 1781 570 1102 1781 3223 360 1781 3267 314 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 37 38 0 44 65 265 271 49 196 201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1653 1781 0 1672 1781 1777 1806 1781 1777 1804 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.9 1.3 4.5 4.5 1.0 3.2 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.9 1.3 4.5 4.5 1.0 3.2 3.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 124 0 115 138 0 130 118 519 527 96 497 504 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.34 0.55 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.39 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1767 0 1640 1767 0 1659 982 1714 1741 982 1714 1740 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 0.0 16.1 15.8 0.0 15.9 16.4 10.7 10.7 16.7 10.6 10.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 1.5 4.0 0.8 0.8 4.2 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.5 1.1 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.1 0.0 17.6 16.8 0.0 17.4 20.4 11.5 11.5 20.9 11.1 11.1 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 70 82 601 446
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.4 17.1 12.4 12.2
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 7.0 14.7 7.4 6.5 15.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 20.0 35.0 36.0 20.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 3.3 5.3 2.9 3.0 6.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.1 2.6 0.3 0.1 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.0
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 8 23 173 1 42 84 465 263 86 385 37 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 8 23 173 1 42 84 465 263 86 385 37 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 58 8 23 177 1 43 86 474 268 88 393 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 100 37 106 235 6 253 127 728 409 129 1090 105 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 426 1224 1781 36 1554 1781 2192 1233 1781 3274 315 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 0 31 177 0 44 86 384 358 88 212 219 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1650 1781 0 1591 1781 1777 1648 1781 1777 1813 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 0.8 4.6 0.0 1.1 2.2 8.8 8.9 2.3 4.3 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.8 4.6 0.0 1.1 2.2 8.8 8.9 2.3 4.3 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 100 0 143 235 0 258 127 590 547 129 591 603 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.00 0.22 0.75 0.00 0.17 0.68 0.65 0.65 0.68 0.36 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 747 0 1141 747 0 1033 747 1229 1140 261 931 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 0.0 20.3 20.0 0.0 17.2 21.6 13.6 13.6 21.6 12.1 12.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.2 0.0 0.7 4.8 0.0 0.3 6.2 1.2 1.3 6.3 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 0.3 2.1 0.0 0.4 1.0 3.0 2.8 1.1 1.6 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 27.2 0.0 21.0 24.8 0.0 17.5 27.8 14.8 14.9 27.9 12.4 12.4 LnGrp LOS C C C B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 89 221 828 519
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.0 23.4 16.2 15.1
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 8.7 8.0 20.5 6.9 12.4 8.0 20.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 33.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 31.0 7.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 2.8 4.2 6.4 3.5 3.1 4.3 10.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.1 0.2 2.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 4.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 17.3
HCM 7th LOS B

EXHIBIT A

VAF Parkside TIA
4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Wood Rodgers, Inc
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 595 20 36 429 9 25
Future Volume (veh/h) 595 20 36 429 9 25
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 654 22 40 471 10 27
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1227 41 84 2099 20 53
Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.59 0.05 0.05
Sat Flow, veh/h 3602 118 1781 3647 431 1165
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 345 40 471 38 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1849 1781 1777 1639 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 4.5 0.7 1.9 0.7 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 4.5 0.7 1.9 0.7 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.06 1.00 0.26 0.71
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 621 647 84 2099 74 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.53 0.48 0.22 0.51 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2374 2470 2796 4748 1642 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.8 7.8 13.9 2.9 14.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.7 4.1 0.1 5.4 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.5 8.5 18.0 2.9 19.3 0.0
LnGrp LOS A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 676 511 38
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 4.1 19.3
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 16.3 23.5 6.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.1
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.0 40.0 40.0 30.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 6.5 3.9 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.0 3.0 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.0
HCM 7th LOS A

EXHIBIT A

Villages at Fairfield Parkside Traffic Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT F

SIMTRAFFIC QUEUING REPORTS

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour 04/30/2025
01_E+B_AM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 32 113 111 177 92 96 214 33 82 50 56 Average Queue (ft) 7 57 48 91 32 39 91 4 40 15 20
95th Queue (ft) 26 98 86 151 70 77 161 22 70 43 49
Link Distance (ft) 935 935 1755 1755 782 782 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Intersection: 2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 60 78 75 82 63 129 105 51 98 114
Average Queue (ft) 23 34 33 30 24 47 36 17 41 54
95th Queue (ft) 54 66 64 64 53 103 80 44 80 100
Link Distance (ft) 738 753 3203 3203 782 782
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 75 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Intersection: 3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 60 36 192 127 111 170 142 88 166 175 Average Queue (ft) 20 11 102 33 44 71 47 38 79 93
95th Queue (ft) 50 34 165 75 83 129 102 74 136 150
Link Distance (ft) 978 735 974 974 3203 3203
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 130 155 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 0 0 0

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
AM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour 04/30/2025
01_E+B_AM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection: 4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR L T T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 64 72 52 78 60 67
Average Queue (ft) 17 23 19 25 11 28
95th Queue (ft) 50 59 47 67 41 54
Link Distance (ft) 1755 1755 205 205 2457
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 5

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour 04/30/2025
02_E+B_PM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 28 153 151 163 100 82 153 62 131 41 50 Average Queue (ft) 2 79 65 83 23 28 74 15 68 8 12
95th Queue (ft) 13 133 117 144 59 62 125 46 112 31 39
Link Distance (ft) 935 935 1755 1755 782 782 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Intersection: 2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 66 52 56 56 77 97 139 67 94 118
Average Queue (ft) 22 21 20 23 34 37 57 27 35 49
95th Queue (ft) 52 49 48 50 64 84 119 57 74 92
Link Distance (ft) 738 753 3203 3203 782 782
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 75 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Intersection: 3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 78 50 136 72 102 143 162 119 121 137 Average Queue (ft) 36 21 69 23 44 75 69 47 51 68
95th Queue (ft) 67 46 114 53 80 124 124 89 99 114
Link Distance (ft) 978 735 974 974 3203 3203
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 130 155 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
PM Existing Plus Background Peak Hour 04/30/2025
02_E+B_PM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection: 4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR L T T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 84 98 58 59 40 50
Average Queue (ft) 22 32 22 13 5 20
95th Queue (ft) 63 78 48 42 24 45
Link Distance (ft) 1755 1755 205 205 2457
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour 04/30/2025 03_E+B+P_AM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 42 116 115 177 91 100 178 33 82 44 69 Average Queue (ft) 8 56 48 93 33 40 95 3 39 13 23
95th Queue (ft) 28 98 87 158 70 81 156 20 70 40 56
Link Distance (ft) 935 935 1755 1755 782 782 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Intersection: 2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 52 76 87 86 63 131 92 63 98 120
Average Queue (ft) 19 33 36 33 25 46 37 19 40 54
95th Queue (ft) 48 64 68 68 55 101 79 49 78 100
Link Distance (ft) 738 753 3203 3203 782 782
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 75 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 1 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 1 0
Intersection: 3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 54 40 200 196 102 159 138 103 201 223 Average Queue (ft) 21 10 109 42 48 71 52 38 87 99
95th Queue (ft) 50 34 177 119 86 126 105 76 158 168
Link Distance (ft) 978 735 974 974 3203 3203
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 130 155 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 0 0 0

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
AM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour 04/30/2025 03_E+B+P_AM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection: 4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR L T T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 67 74 53 84 54 70
Average Queue (ft) 17 22 20 27 11 29
95th Queue (ft) 50 58 46 69 39 55
Link Distance (ft) 1755 1755 205 205 2457
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 7

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour 04/30/2025 04_E+B+P_PM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection: 1: Clay Bank Rd & Manuel Campos Pkwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 23 166 168 172 68 78 175 54 138 33 41 Average Queue (ft) 2 82 70 81 21 28 77 14 67 7 10
95th Queue (ft) 13 141 129 137 52 62 138 43 110 29 35
Link Distance (ft) 935 935 1755 1755 782 782 788
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 215 205 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Intersection: 2: Clay Bank Rd & Gulf Dr
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 67 58 66 62 81 153 180 70 94 106
Average Queue (ft) 23 21 25 24 34 43 62 29 36 50
95th Queue (ft) 54 50 56 52 69 103 123 59 75 92
Link Distance (ft) 738 753 3203 3203 782 782
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 75 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Intersection: 3: Clay Bank Rd & Horizon Dr/Horizon Circle Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 82 55 148 104 103 155 185 111 124 138 Average Queue (ft) 36 21 74 23 47 83 77 50 54 71
95th Queue (ft) 69 49 125 61 85 140 140 93 101 118
Link Distance (ft) 978 735 974 974 3203 3203
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 130 155 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0

EXHIBIT A

Queuing and Blocking Report
PM Existing Plus Background Plus Project Peak Hour 04/30/2025 04_E+B+P_PM VAF Parkside TIA SimTraffic Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection: 4: Portland Dr & Manuel Campos Pkwy/Cement Hill Rd Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR L T T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 82 106 54 71 45 60
Average Queue (ft) 25 37 23 16 6 23
95th Queue (ft) 67 84 49 51 27 50
Link Distance (ft) 1755 1755 205 205 2457
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1

EXHIBIT A

PF

8.0± AC

GULF DR

PASSION LN

JAMBOREE DR

SPUR LN

FRIENDLY VALLEY LN

HIDEAWAY LN

CLEMENTINE LN

PASSION LN

GLEE LN

MUSE WAY

BALANCE CIRCENTER DR

GULF DR

PASSION LN

JAMBOREE DR

SPUR LN

FRIENDLY VALLEY LN

HIDEAWAY LN

CLEMENTINE LN

PASSION LN

GLEE LN

MUSE WAY

BALANCE CIRCENTER DR

FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME

VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD - PARKSIDE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT EXHIBIT DATE: OCTOBER 2024

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS

GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS EXISTING ACREAGE PROPOSED ACREAGE

0.0± 8.0±
TOTAL 8.0± 8.0±

RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM)

DIFFERENCE
+8.0±
0 PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) 8.0± 0.0± -8.0±
RM

8.0± AC

EXHIBIT B

CITY OF FAIRFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC2025-07

RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM PUBLIC

FACILITIES (PF) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) AND A CORRESPONDING ZONE CHANGE FROM PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM), AND AN ADDENDUM (ER2025-0024) TO THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH 2004032064); AND

GRANTING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT 7.99-ACRE SITE LOCATED EAST OF PASSION LANE, SOUTH OF GULF DRIVE, AND NORTH OF THE LINEAR PARK TRAIL (APN: 0170-010-052) FOR PARKSIDE, A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 76 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE; AND

GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY DESIGN

GUIDELINES
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. On February 11, 2025, applications for a General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002}, Zone Change (ZC2025-003}, Tentative Subdivision Map {TS2025-002}, Development Review Single Family (DR2025-005), Environmental Review {ER2025-0024), and an amendment to the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines for proposed 76 single-family residential units located east of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170-010-052) {the Project) were properly filed with the Department of Community Development in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the official filing of such applications.

Section 2. The Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2025.

The City staff presented substantial factual information regarding the proposed Project in staff reports and through oral presentations before the Commission. The Planning Commission considered all public testimony and information presented during the public hearing regarding this application.

Section 3. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report {ER2025-004} (2025 Addendum or ER2025-004) for the Project and all comments received, and has determined that the following findings support the adoption of the EIR Addendum, to wit:
(a) Based on the whole record before it, the Commission hereby finds and determines that the proposed Project, including the change in land use designation and zoning of 7.99 acres, and the addition of 76 residential units, will not result in new significant adverse impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. The 2025 Addendum appropriately incorporates all relevant mitigation measures from the VAF EIR to mitigate previously identified impacts to a less than significant level consistent with California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164. Therefore, the existing El Rs along with the Addendum adequately address PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 1

the potential environmental impacts of the Parkside Project, and no further environmental review is required.

Section 4. The commission adopts the following findings in recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests:
(a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. The proposed Parkside subdivision is consistent with the proposed amendment to the City's General Plan, which designates the area for Residential Medium (RM) development. This designation is intended for single-family housing, that is serviced by recreational activities and enhanced walkability. This subdivision fulfills this through the development of 76 single-family residential units, and its proximity to the Fairfield Linear Park trail and the proposed Village I park. The proposed subdivisions' design and improvement provisions align with several key General Plan policies and objectives: Objective LU-2.1 (Consistency with Density Ranges) The proposed 9.5 density development is consistent with the prescribed 9.0 to

18.0 density ranges in the General Plan. The Project's layout and design ensure that residential density is managed effectively, complying with the medium density residential requirements; Policy LU-1 (Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, well-balanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city's scale, services, and surrounding environment) The subdivision is part of the Villages Master Plan, a series of thoughtfully planned communities. The size and design of the subdivision are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the master-planned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-2 (Promote a variety of housing types to serve the diverse needs of the community and stimulate investment) The Project builds 76 small-lot single-family homes, a less common housing type within Fairfield's traditional single-family neighborhoods. This addition contributes to greater housing diversity and supports the City's goals for a balanced and inclusive housing mix; and Policy LU-16: (Ensure that new development is designed to optimize Fairfield's Linear Park, making the park a central feature that enhances quality of life, connectivity, and recreational opportunities for residents) The Project is located adjacent to the Fairfield Linear Park, offering residents convenient access. Housing along the southern boundary of the Project site is oriented toward the trail, with windows providing natural surveillance and "eyes on the trail." This design enhances safety, encourages passive monitoring, and promotes interaction between residents and trail users, fostering a more active and welcoming public space; (b) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed amendments would redesignate 7.99-acres of vacant land for 76 single-family residential units. The addition of more residential land will not jeopardize public interest, health, safety, convenience, or the welfare of the City in that the planned development will be subject to a collection of conditions of approval to ensure its safe and orderly development and operation. Future access to the site is provided via Passion Lane; PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 2

(c) The site is physically suitable (including, but not limited to access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/developments. The Parkside subdivision site has been thoroughly assessed and found ideal for residential development. The site is served by existing streets and utilities such as water, sewer, electricity, and road networks, which are sufficient to support the new development's increased demand. The pre-existing infrastructure ensures that residents will have access to all essential services. The site's relatively flat topography requires minimal grading and thus will preserve the natural landscape. Additionally, the Projects development plan intentionally avoids impacting sensitive habitats as much as possible;
(d) The proposed amendment is in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA). An Addendum to the previously certified Villages at Fairfield EIR has been prepared for the Project, as permitted under CEQA. The Addendum determined that all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project were previously analyzed in the certified £/Rs. No new significant impacts have been identified; therefore, no further environmental review is required.

Section 5. The Planning Commission adopts the following findings in support of the Tentative Subdivision Map request:
(a) The proposed subdivision, together with the provision for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City's General Plan in that the General Plan designates the area development. The proposed Parkside subdivision is consistent with the proposed amendment to the City's General Plan, which designates the area for Residential Medium {RM) development. This designation is intended for single-family housing, that is serviced by recreational activities and enhanced walkability. This subdivision fulfills this through the development of 76 single-family residential units, and its proximity to the Fairfield Linear Park trail and the proposed Village I park. The proposed subdivisions' design and improvement provisions align with several key General Plan policies and objectives:

Objective LU-2.1 {Consistency with Density Ranges) The proposed 9.5 density development is consistent with the prescribed 9.0 to 18.0 density ranges in the General Plan. The Project's layout and design ensure that residential density is managed effectively, complying with the medium density residential requirements; Policy LU-1 {Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, well-balanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city's scale, services, and surrounding environment) The subdivision is part of the Villages Master Plan, a series of thoughtfully planned communities. The size and design of the subdivision are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the master-planned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-2 {Promote a variety of housing types to serve the diverse needs of the community and stimulate investment) The Project builds 76 small-lot single-family PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 3

homes, a less common housing type within Fairfield's traditional single-family neighborhoods. This addition contributes to greater housing diversity and supports the City's goals for a balanced and inclusive housing mix; and Policy LU-16: (Ensure that new development is designed to optimize Fairfield's Linear Park, making the park a central feature that enhances quality of life, connectivity, and recreational opportunities for residents) The Project is located adjacent to the Fairfield Linear Park, offering residents convenient access. Housing along the southern boundary of the Project site is oriented toward the trail, with windows providing natural surveillance and "eyes on the trail." This design enhances safety, encourages passive monitoring, and promotes interaction between residents and trail users, fostering a more active and welcoming public space; (b) The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development and, with proper development techniques, may be developed into its intended use. The Parkside subdivision site has been thoroughly assessed and found ideal for residential development. The site is served by existing streets and utilities such as water, sewer, electricity, and road networks, which are sufficient to support the new development's increased demand. The pre-existing infrastructure ensures that residents will have access to all essential services. The site's relatively flat topography requires minimal grading and thus will preserve the natural landscape. Additionally, the Projects development plan intentionally avoids impacting sensitive habitats as much as possible; (c) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the Parkside subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably harm fish, wildlife, or their habitats. The development plan has been carefully crafted to avoid sensitive habitats whenever possible. A comprehensive environmental review was conducted as part of the proposed Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report {EIR}, ensuring that all potential impacts have been identified and addressed. Mitigation measures have been included to protect biological and cultural resources and minimize any negative effects on the natural environment. Additionally, the site is not located near any known fish and wildlife habitats, further reducing the likelihood of harm to any wildlife;
(d) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the community water and sewer systems are available to the site. The design and improvements of the subdivision are not likely to cause any public health issues. The proposed subdivision is located within a residential neighborhood and is served by pre-existing water and sewer systems. The existing utility infrastructure will be reviewed, and the Project will incorporate both standard and special conditions of approval to ensure these systems are evaluated and upgraded as needed to handle the additional demand from the new development. By providing dependable water and sewer services, the Project ensures the public health and safety of future residents; PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, T52025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE4

(e) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easement acquired by the public for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that there are no access easements for use by the public at large existing on the subject site. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, as there are no access easements for use by the public at large existing on the subject site;
(f) The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer serving said proposed subdivision will not result in or add to a violation of the waste discharge requirements applicable to said sewer system which were prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, in that the existing Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District treatment plant has adequate capacity. The discharge from the proposed Project will not create a condition exceeding the design capacity at the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District treatment plant. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in or contribute to a violation of the waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. The Project incorporates standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that the capacity of these systems is evaluated and upgraded as necessary to handle the increased demand from the new development.

Evaluations will confirm that the discharge from the subdivision will not exceed the design capacity of the treatment plant, ensuring continued compliance with regulatory standards and safeguarding public health and environmental quality.

Section 6. The Planning Commission adopts the following findings in support of the Development Review requests:
(a) The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and any applicable Areawide of Specific Plan. The Project will be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance following the City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment {GPA2025- 002) and Zone Change (ZC2025-002). The Project is consistent with several General Plan Policies and Objectives, such as Policy LU-1: (Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, wellbalanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city's scale, services, and surrounding environment) The size and design of the Project are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the masterplanned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-7: (Enhance and improve the built environment in Fairfield through site design that emphasizes cohesive, compact, connected, and "human-scaled" development, defined as neighborhoods, places, and streetscapes focused on the needs and experience of people) The Project enhances and improves the built environment in Fairfield through inclusive development typologies and site design that emphasizes cohesive, compact, connected, and human-scaled development. Additionally, the Project prioritizes walkability and circulation through a network of connected interior streets and aesthetically pleasing streetscapes. The uniform architectural design and smaller lot sizes PC Item No: H.l
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-00S, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 5

compliment the surrounding communities, contributing to a pedestrian-friendly neighborhood character; and Policy HS-2: (Prevent urban fires and protect the community from wildfire danger) Throughout the entitlement process, the applicant has coordinated closely with the Fire Department to receive feedback on the proposed Projects design, including making modifications to the Projects site design to address all departmental requests;
(b) The exterior design and appearance of the Project will not cause the nature of the neighborhood to economically, physically, or visually decline. The Project is located on an undeveloped lot within Village I. The development features high-quality architectural elements and materials that are aesthetically pleasing and consistent with the surrounding area. The Project includes thoughtful and environmentally friendly landscaping choices, featuring a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. These elements will enhance the visual appeal and create a harmonious blend with the existing neighborhood. The Project also incorporates standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that architectural integrity, site improvements, and lighting meet the city's design guidelines. These efforts help maintain the economic stability, physical upkeep, and visual character of the neighborhood;
(c) The Project is of high-quality design consistent with applicable design policies and standards of the City. The Project features a high-quality design consistent with the applicable design policies and standards of the City and the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines. It includes high-quality architectural elements and materials, utilizing a variety of textures, colors, and structural detailing. The development incorporates thoughtful landscaping with a mix of trees, shrubs, and ground cover, enhancing visual appeal and creating a harmonious blend with the existing neighborhood. Additionally, the Project includes standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that all site improvements, including lighting and infrastructure, meet the City's criteria for highquality development. These elements collectively ensure that the Project meets City standards and contributes positively to the surrounding neighborhood; (d) Any potentially significant negative impacts to environmental quality and natural resources have been properly mitigated. For this reason, the proposed Project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Potentially significant negative impacts to environmental quality and natural resources on the Project site have been properly mitigated. Comprehensive environmental reviews, including the Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report {EIR} have been conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA). These reviews have identified all potential environmental impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures have been incorporated to address issues such as biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and greenhouse gas emissions. These measures ensure that any adverse effects are minimized to a less than significant level, preserving the integrity of the natural environment and maintaining compliance with CEQA standards. As a result, the proposed PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 6

Project adheres to all regulatory requirements, safeguarding environmental quality and promoting sustainable development.

Section 7. Based upon the written findings set forth in sections 3 and 4 of this Resolution, the commission hereby recommends City Council approve:
(a) General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002);
(b) Zone Change (ZC2025-003);
(c) Environmental Review (ER2025-0024).

Section 8. Based upon the written findings set forth in sections 5 and 6 of this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby approves:
(a) Development Review Single Family (DR2025-005), and Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-003) subject to the conditions contained in the attached Exhibit A.

Section 9. The record of proceedings shall be located at the City's Community Development Department, and the Director of Community Development shall be the custodian of such documents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8
th day of October 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COM MISSIONERS: KENNEDY /ALI-SULLIVANf@RE'o'E/MA TTH EWS/PAUL/REESE/SINGH NOES: COMMISSIONERS: -N~o-n e-- -· ---------------
ABSENT: coMM1ss1ONERs: -'G'e,=-r(cv=-v~e ,.___ _
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ~N~=D~V\~e__ ~---------------
'-71- (kCHAIR
ATTEST:

PC Item No: H.1
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PAGE 7

PLANNING COMMISSION

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Project Name: PARKSIDE – THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD
Address: North of Air Base Parkway and East of Clay Bank Road Hearing Date: October 08, 2025
File No.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, ER2025-024, TS2025-002, DR2025-005 Development Review approval has been granted subject to compliance with the following conditions which must be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits, unless noted otherwise:

1.0 SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1.1 Applicant shall incorporate the following special conditions reflecting the modifications and/or needed information into their plans as part of their submittal to the Building Division of the Community Development Department:
a) Prior to recordation of the final map, the Applicant shall provide the following to the City of Fairfield’s Information Technology Department:
i) A CAD file (DWG) of the General Plan boundaries of APN 0170–010-052. The Applicant shall provide the CAD in the City’s requested coordinate system. ii) A CAD file (DWG) of the Zoning Map boundaries of APN 0170–010-052. The Applicant shall provide the CAD in the City’s requested coordinate system. iii) A Word file describing the General Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning Designations of APN 0170–010-052.
b) Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide documentation of Minor Development Review approval for any new or revised house plans (Parkside, Schematic Design, dated January 31, 2025). c) Prior to recordation of the final map, the Applicant shall demonstrate the provision of

0.23 acres of qualifying open space.

1.2 Applicant shall comply with the conditions of the Public Works Department as contained in the attached memo dated October 8, 2025. In the event that compliance with any of the referenced Conditions of Approval presents substantial challenges due to unforeseen or exceptional circumstances, the Developer may submit a formal written request on letterhead to the City of Fairfield outlining the specific issue and a proposed revision. The City will review the request and respond in writing. Approval of any revisions remains at the sole discretion of the City.;

1.3 Applicant shall comply with the conditions of the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District as contained in the attached memo dated March 13, 2025. In the event that compliance with any of the referenced Conditions of Approval presents substantial challenges due to unforeseen or exceptional circumstances, the Developer may submit a formal written request on letterhead to the City of Fairfield outlining the specific issue and a proposed revision. The City will review the

EXHIBIT A

request and respond in writing. Approval of any revisions remains at the sole discretion of the City.;

1.4 Development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans titled “Villages at Fairfield, Parkside” last revised July 3, 2025, and “Community Design Guidelines” dated September 17, 2025, except as may be modified by conditions stated herein.

2.0 APPROVAL TIME LIMITS/REVOCATION

2.1 Approval of this application shall run concurrent with the Development Agreement for The Villages at Fairfield. If building permits are not issued and diligently pursued toward completion prior to expiration of the Development Agreement, or if the approved use has not commenced prior to expiration of the Development Agreement and no permits are required, the approval shall be void.

2.2 This approval shall not be valid unless and until the following additional approval(s) are granted:
a) Planning Commission Approval of D.R. 2025-005, T.S. 2025-002; b) City Council Approval of G.P.A. 2025-002, Z.C. 2025-003, and E.R. 2025-024.

3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 The project shall proceed only in accordance with the approved tentative subdivision map plans titled “Villages at Fairfield, Parkside,” as prepared by Wood Rodgers, consisting of 9 sheets, dated "June 2025, revised July 3, 2025", architecture plans titled “Parkside - Schematic Design”,” as prepared by KTGY, consisting of 25 sheets, dated January 31, 2025, except as may be modified by the conditions contained herein and approved by the Planning Division pursuant to Section 3.2, and shall proceed in accordance with the Fairfield City Code. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval and required improvements, such as landscaping, shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City.

3.2 Approval of this project shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Fairfield City Code (Zoning, Subdivision, Building Codes, etc.), Fairfield General Plan, and applicable policy plans.

3.3 When submitting for Plan Check, the applicant must provide to the Community Development Department a copy of these Conditions of Development Review with a cover letter specifying how and where the revised plans address each of the conditions. Plan Check by the Community Development Department will not be completed without compliance with this condition.

3.4 All construction plans, including but not limited to, the site plan, building elevations, landscaping and irrigation plans, grading plan, mechanical drawings, street improvement plans, and detailed drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits shall be coordinated for consistency by the applicant prior to issuance of any permits or prior to final map approval as applicable, or commencement of the subject use, whichever comes first. Any change or modification to one particular plan shall require the corresponding revisions on other plans. All

plans shall be consistent with that approved by the Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for correcting any inconsistency which may occur through error or omission during plan preparation or construction.

3.5 The project is subject to the Solano County Public Facilities Development fee. The applicant will be required to pay such fee at the rate which is in effect at the time a building permit is issued.

3.6 The Applicant, and property owner(s), and their successors in interest, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents and employees (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any and all claims, actions, lawsuits, damages, losses and liabilities arising or resulting from the granting of this approval by the City or the exercise of the rights granted by this approval. This indemnification obligation shall include, but not be limited to, paying all fees and costs incurred by legal counsel of the City's choice in representing the Indemnitees in connection with any such claims, actions or lawsuits, any expert fees, and any award of damages, judgments, verdicts, court costs or attorneys' fees in any such claim, action or lawsuit. The City shall promptly notify Applicant and property owners of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. Applicant or property owners shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Applicant and property owners shall reimburse the City, and each of the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by it in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.

4.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT

4.1 A precise plan for all fences and retaining and screening walls shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits.

Such plan shall indicate the location, design and construction details. Fences or walls visible from public view on or off-site shall be provided with decorative treatment.

4.2 It shall be the applicant's responsibility to coordinate the location of all utility equipment with P.G. & E. Final locations of all above ground equipment must be approved by P.G. & E., the Community Development Department and Public Works Department prior to issuance of building permits.

4.3 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances on private residential properties such as air conditioning units shall be located out of public view and/or adequately screened through the use of fencing, concrete or masonry walls, decorative steel, berming, painting and/or landscaping. Said appurtenances shall be indicated on the plot plans prior to issuance of building permits.

4.4 If the project is to be phased, a phasing plan showing the sequence of site improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. Each phase shall function independently.

4.5 A block wall along shall be constructed along the eastern project site boundary. The

maintenance of the wall is subject to CFD funds.

4.6 An eight foot Public Utility Easement is to be located behind the back of the sidewalk along internal streets A,B, and C of the project site. In the event PG&E requests a 10-foot minimum Public Utility Easement, the City shall designate two feet of sidewalk closest to the residential unit to be counted in the 10 feet total.

4.7 Provide dry sack or painted tex-cote finish to concrete bases of exterior light poles.

5.0 BUILDING DESIGN
Residential Buildings

5.1 For single family and duplex projects, all corner dwellings and two-story buildings shall include architectural details (additional wood or built up stucco trim, plant-ons or other details) on the side and rear elevations facing streets and open space areas to match the detailing of the front elevation, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department.

Building Plans shall include separate sheets for these “enhanced” elevations and the site plan shall identify these units.

5.2 The veneer materials shall be wrapped around the side elevations up to either the fence lines or up to the first change in wall planes or other appropriate conclusion. The applicant shall request an inspection by the Community Development Department prior to stucco application to assure that this condition of approval has been satisfied.

5.3 All windows and doorways shall receive wood or stucco built-up trim, or other accent treatment, on all elevations.

5.4 Sectional roll-up garage doors shall be used on all house plans.

5.5 Where horizontal (e.g., “hardiplank”) siding is proposed on any single-family home, this siding shall continue through to the entire wall plane on which the siding is being affixed, unless otherwise allowed by the Community Development Department. On corner lots, all wall planes facing a street side-yard on which siding is proposed shall be completely sided with horizontal siding.

5.6 Where a fireplace or other heating system is vented to the side of any structure (i.e., no chimney or roof pipe is employed), the exterior portion of the vent and any related flashing shall be painted either a flat black color or a color that matches the surrounding wall.

5.7 Only the following woodburning appliances shall be installed in residential and commercial buildings: (1) a pellet-fueled wood heater; (2) an EPA certified wood heater; (3) a fireplace certified by EPA should EPA develop a fireplace certification program; or (4) a gas fireplace.

6.0 LANDSCAPING

6.1 The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval below as well as the Landscaping

requirements specified in the approved Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines, dated August 12, 2025. Where conflicts exist between the Landscaping Conditions of Approval and the approved Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines, the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines take precedent.

6.2 This project shall utilize water conservation techniques, such as drip irrigation and drought tolerant plant species, as required in accordance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

6.3 Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Such plans shall be prepared and stamped by a California licensed landscape architect or other equally educated and qualified experienced professional to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and accompanied by a statement or stamp by a California licensed landscape architect or other equally educated and qualified experienced professional that the plans meet or exceed the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

6.4 Landscape plans shall be scaled to a minimum of 1 inch = 20 feet and shall specify the following:
a) The location and size of all plant materials and shall include a plant legend specifying species type (botanical and common name), container size, and quantity of all plant materials;
b) Spacing for trees and shrubs, when a particular 'effect' (street canopy, hedges, barriers, screens...) is required shall be specified. Spacing for all groundcovers shall be specified; c) The locations of all pavements (vehicular and pedestrian), walls, fencing, buildings, roof overhangs and other structures, utility equipment (air conditioners, transformers, backflow preventers, etc.), property lines, and other pertinent site plan features.

6.5 Plant materials shall comply with the following:
a) Plant materials shall consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and groundcovers to provide design interest and as a protective measure against disease and insect infestation. Low maintenance plants are also encouraged; b) Only live groundcover is allowed in high visibility and pedestrian areas. Exceptions may be approved by the Community Development Department to include, but not be limited to, decorative gravel beds, decomposed granite paths or pedestrian spaces and areas to be covered by shrubs;
c) All landscape planting areas shall be mulched and/or covered with bark chips or other similar material, unless growth of live groundcovers would be impeded, or is necessary for weed control, as determined by the Community Development Department. Large areas of exposed soil are prohibited;
d) Drought tolerant species suitable for the Fairfield area are encouraged, as contained in the reference list prepared by the Public Works Department;

e) Plant material selections must consider the hardiness needs for the Fairfield area. Species particularly susceptible to, or potentially damaged by, disease, insects, winter freeze and other climatic conditions in Fairfield are discouraged. Species exhibiting particular problems in the Fairfield area may not be permitted and, as such, plant substitutions may be required by the Community Development Department to fulfill this condition.

6.6 Plant material size and spacing shall comply with the following:
a) Where plant materials are placed in two (2) or more rows, planting rows shall be staggered; b) Evergreen trees required for screening purposes shall not be less than six (6) feet in height at time of planting;
c) Large shrubs required for screening purposes shall not be less than twenty-four (24) inches in height at time of planting. Spacing shall be between four (4) and six (6) feet on-center, as determined by the Community Development Department;
d) Groundcovers shall be spaced such that full coverage is achieved at the end of one to two years.

6.7 Planting and staking details shall comply with the following:
a) Landscape plans shall include planting and staking details in text and/or drawing form to insure proper installation and establishment of proposed plant materials; b) Soils shall be tested to identify existing soil conditions and necessary amendments. All planting pits shall be twice the diameter of the diameter of the root container; c) All trees shall be double-staked, except that twenty-four (24) inch or larger box trees may require guy wires or triple- staking as determined by the Community Development Department. Guy wires are prohibited within pedestrian traffic areas. Protect trees from contact with any wire used in staking;
d) Provide root deflectors for all trees planted within eight (8) feet of paved surfaces. e) All planters in areas which have been compacted, such as adjacent to buildings and in parking lots, shall be de-compacted to the following depths: planters less than three (3) feet wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of twenty-four (24) inches below subgrade; planters three to ten (3 - 10) feet wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of 18 inches below subgrade; planters more than 10 feet' wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of 12 inches below subgrade; f) Planters 10 feet or less in width in locations that will not allow normal percolation of 24 to 36 hours maximum (such as adjacent to buildings) shall have drain pipes connected to the storm drain system or shall have dry wells installed as determined necessary by the Community Development Department;

g) The finished grade of planter islands or wells shall have a crown with a 2% slope down to surrounding grade or top of curb and a one (1) foot lip. Planters adjacent to buildings where a crown cannot be installed will require subdrains if adequate surface drainage will not be provided.

6.8 Stormwater treatment areas shall have an enhanced aesthetic design through the combination of appropriate shrubs/groundcover, perennial herbaceous species, and rounded aggregate such as 'river rock'.

6.9 Berms shall be illustrated according to slope, width, height above surrounding grade, and landscaping. Landscape berms shall be coordinated for consistency with the grading plan.

6.10 All landscaped areas shall be serviced by an automatic irrigation system.

6.11 All undeveloped building pads shall be fully landscaped and irrigated, or screened by perimeter shrubs to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and shall be incorporated into the required landscape and irrigation plans.

6.12 During installation of landscaping and irrigation, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Division, the landscape architect or design professional responsible for preparing the required plans, or his/her designee, shall monitor installation and visit the site prior to completion of the landscape work and, thereafter, provide a written statement confirming compliance with approved plans and approval of materials to the Community Development Department.

7.0 MAINTENANCE

7.1 All landscape areas shall be maintained in a healthy, thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.

7.2 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed in public right-of-way shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted into a Community Facilities District (CFD).

7.3 All improvements on the site shall be constructed and continuously maintained in compliance with the approved plans.

8.0 SUBDIVISIONS

8.1 The required Community Design Plan shall at a minimum include, but not be limited to, the following:
a) Conceptual landscape plan for public and private streetscapes and other rights-of-way, and common areas;
b) Fencing/wall plan which specifies height, location, design, and materials for fencing and/or walls including interface fencing for pedestrian entries to open space areas;

c) Community identification signs or other entry features; d) An open space plan which describes how each type of open space will be utilized, improved, maintained, and phased with development;
e) Architectural design theme for the project as a whole. The intent is to establish general design concepts which will be followed throughout development. The theme may include, but not be limited to: design, roof pitch, materials, colors, fireplace detailing, trims, house numbering, and detailing of front doors. Architectural design theme shall incorporate colors (i.e., earth-tones or neutral colors) and building designs which are sensitive to off-site views to the project;
f) Conceptual lighting plan including decorative street lighting and lighting of special features.

Street lights should be chosen from the approved list available from the Community Development Department;
g) Conceptual mailbox plan;
h) Accent treatment to the driveways of individual homes.

8.2 Within single family subdivisions, submit a Plot Plan for each lot at the time a request is made for building permits. The Plot Plan shall include:
a) Table with the applicable minimum zoning setback dimensions; b) Property lines;
c) Curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations;
d) Dimensioned setbacks and separation between adjacent buildings; e) Dimensioned Private Open Space;
f) Water meter location;
g) Unit model, number, and elevation type;
h) Color scheme.

8.3 Subdivisions of 10 lots or more shall have a minimum of three (3) different floor plans and three (3) different elevations.
a) Architectural details on side and rear elevations facing streets and open space areas shall be enhanced to match the detailing of the front elevation. b) The same house plan shall not be permitted for units that are adjacent and along the same street or face each other across any street.

c) For subdivisions with four different floor plans, no single model (floor plan) shall exceed 28% of the total number of units on the same street or the project as a whole. For subdivisions with three different floor plans, no single model (floor plan) shall exceed 35% of the total number of units on the same street or the project as a whole. d) Any changes to the housing mix shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department Director.

8.4 Within single family subdivisions, submit a Minor Discretionary Review application to the Planning Division for the review and approval of a Master Development Plan (MDP). MDP shall identify lot-by-lot which house plans are proposed for development. The MDP shall include the following information:
a) Overall site plan for the subdivision;
b) Proposed phasing of development, indicated which streets are active for public traffic and emergency vehicles;
c) Typical setback dimensions for each floor plan;
d) Table providing distribution percentage of product mix; e) Property lines;
f) Curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations;
g) Lot number, unit model and elevation type;
i) Each unit model shall be identified by a different color; ii) Lots requiring enhanced elevations shall be identified; h) Retaining walls;
i) Water meter locations

8.5 The draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and a copy of a typical deed shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and the City Attorney. The approved CC&R's shall be recorded concurrently with the final map and a recorded copy provided to the City. A copy of the deed for the first dwelling unit shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to granting of a final inspection.

8.6 The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department reduction(s) (8-1/2" x 11") of each page of the recorded final map at a scale of 1 inch = 800 feet within two (2) weeks of the date of recordation. No building permits shall be issued until such time as the reduction(s) have been received.

9.0 SIGNS

9.1 Signs are not part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this project shall be designed in conformance with the Sign Ordinance and established Sign Policy and shall require separate application and approval by the Community Development Department prior to installation.

9.2 A uniform sign program for this project shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The sign program shall include type, size and locations, colors, materials, lettering style, etc. for all signs.

10.0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND FEES

10.1 Capital Improvement Fee: The City has adopted a Capital Improvement Fee (AB1600) to be paid as a part of the Building Permit Fees. All new development within the City is subject to this fee upon issuance of building permits, unless exempted by grandfather provisions. Contact the City’s Finance Department at (707) 428-7496.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

91. The following special conditions reflecting the modifications and/or needed information shall be incorporated into the subdivision plans as part of the Final Map submittal. All conditions shall be met to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to Final Map recordation.
a. Final Map submittals shall include a construction phasing plan. The phasing plan shall identify Emergency Vehicle Access subject to the review and approval of the Fire and Public Works Department.
b. Public access easement(s) shall be recorded as shown on “Tentative Subdivision/Condominium Map – Villages at Fairfield, Parkside”, dated July 03, 2025 and as conditioned.

92. The Developer has requested the City consider a variance to the City’s Standard 10’-wide Public Service Easement (PSE) along proposed public streets in this development. Any variances to easement width shall be reflected on the final subdivision map as approved by the City Engineer and City Land Surveyor.

Encroachment Permit:

93. Please note, the Developer shall apply for, and be issued, an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department prior to constructing any improvements in the public rightof-way, which may include: sidewalk modifications, constructing new driveways, relocating existing utilities, connecting new water and sewer services, installing new water meters and sewer cleanouts. This is a separate permit from the construction permit(s) issued by the City’s Building Department. During the first Building Department plan check, the Public Works Department shall provide Developer an encroachment permit application, including an assigned encroachment permit number (ex. PW22-00001). The developer or his contractor shall furnish the necessary insurance, bonds and pay all fees associated with the encroachment permit. A field investigation fee shall be charged if any work within the right-of-way is performed either without or prior to securing an encroachment permit.

Miscellaneous:

94. All public improvements shall be designed and constructed to current City of Fairfield standards.

95. Existing public facilities damaged during the course of construction shall be repaired by the developer, at his sole expense, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

96. Mailboxes shall be installed in accordance with City requirements and postal regulations.

97. Prior to the beginning construction of public improvements, the developer shall enter into an improvement agreement with the City. The developer shall furnish the necessary insurance, bonds and pay all fees associated with the improvement agreement.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Conditions of Development
Date: October 8, 2025
To: Meily Sheehan, Planning Manager
From: Daria Young, Kimley-Horn & Associates – Project Consultant Elizabeth Cobb, Kimley-Horn & Associates – Project Consultant on behalf of Alvin Lei, PE, Senior Civil Engineer – City of Fairfield, 707-428-7476 Project Name: Parkside – consists of approximately 7.99 acres, which includes 76 single-family residential units, a pollinator garden, and a bench.

Project Location: East of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Fairfield Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170–010-052)
Review Requested: General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002)
Zoning Change (ZC2025-003)
Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-002)
Environmental Review (ER2025-024)
Development Review (DR2025-005)
Copies To: Ryan N. Panganiban, Asst. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Michael Hether, Asst. Director of Public Works/Utilities Jason Riley, Assistant City Engineer
Garland Wong, City Traffic Engineer
Alvin Lei, Senior Civil Engineer (Development)
Christiana Lewis, Senior Management Analyst (Special Districts) Corey Beavers, Management Analyst (Solid Waste)

Helpful Phone Numbers
City of Fairfield Other Agencies
Finance Department (707) 428-7496 Army Corps of Engineers (916) 557-5250 Fire Department (707) 428-7550 California Department of Fish & Wildlife (707) 944-5500 Community Development (707) 428-7461 Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (707) 429-8930 Public Works (707) 428-7485 Federal Emergency Management Agency (415) 923-7190 Comcast Cable (800) 945-2288
SBC Communications (707) 258-5136
Pacific Gas and Electric (707) 449-5769
Regional Water Quality Control Board (510) 622-2300
Solano Irrigation District (707) 448-6847
For any questions or clarifications regarding the following conditions of development, please email [email protected] to request a meeting.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Site-Specific Development Conditions
General:

1. Any alteration to the final conditions of approval by the Developer shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether approval of the proposed alteration is permissible in accordance with Fairfield Municipal Code Section 25.42.6, Changes to an Approved Project.

Development Agreement:

2. Rancho Tolenas Corporation (“Developer”) is currently in the process of amending the “Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement,” (“DA”) executed between the City of Fairfield and Rancho Tolenas Corporation, et. al, recorded at Solano County as Document #201600000233, inclusive of subsequent amendments. The requirements and/or conditions found within the current DA, including those as otherwise amended by the City Council of the City of Fairfield, that pertain to this project, shall govern over these conditions of development in the event there are any conflicts found between these documents.

Traffic Study:

3. A traffic study has been prepared by Wood Rogers for the Parkside project, dated August 11, 2025. All proposed improvements shall be consistent with the findings of this study.

Please refer to the Streetssection for conditions related to street improvements required as part of this project.

The Developer shall conduct and submit a traffic impact study of key intersections, for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer, within one (1) calendar year following the issuance of half the building permits within this subdivision, being the 38th building permit, to validate the operation of the conditioned improvements. The traffic impact study shall assess traffic operations at select key intersections previously identified in the Development Agreement or VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans. The specific study intersections to be included in the analysis shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer and shall include but not be limited to trip generation, VMT, queuing analyses, and mitigation measures, if applicable. Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall validate and complete construction of all recommended intersection and roadway improvements resultant from this assessment to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Public Water Infrastructure Modifications:

4. With the first submittal of improvement plans, the Developer shall submit a fire flow model to the City of Fairfield’s Public Works Department to confirm the required flows necessary to serve the proposed development. The Developer shall pay for the City’s consultant to confirm required flows necessary to serve the proposed development

Parkside
October 08, 2025

through the City’s water model. All costs associated with the City’s water modeling shall be borne by the developer at their sole expense. The Developer shall provide a deposit to Public Works prior to City conducting water modeling. As part of the proposed development, the developer shall construct the improvements necessary to support the proposed development resulting from the updated water model at the developer’s sole cost and expense.

Tree Wells:

5. Prior to City’s execution of an improvement agreement, the Applicant shall notify the City Engineer, in writing, which of the following options Developer intends to satisfy for the intended landscaping along the Project’s frontage streets (Passion Lane and Gulf Drive).
a. Option 1: A Homeowners’ Association (HOA), or similar property association, shall be established for the ownership and maintenance of tree wells along Passion Lane and Gulf Drive, as shown on the Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated July 3, 2025. Prior to recordation of Final Map, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development and Public Works departments proof of HOA, or similar property association, formation.
b. Option 2: If the Applicant elects to not establish a HOA or similar property association for the ownership and maintenance of the tree wells, as shown on the Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated July 3, 2025, the Developer shall reduce the width of the attached sidewalk to 5’ to provide an additional 3’ of landscaped space to the front yard to meet the Project’s minimum landscape requirement and shall ensure maintenance funding is incorporated into an existing or newly created Community Facilities District. and shall ensure maintenance funding is incorporated into an existing or newly created Community Facilities District.

Domestic Water and Irrigation Services:

6. The developer shall extend existing water mains from Passion Lane to serve the proposed development.

7. The proposed development shall satisfy current state Minimum Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) requirements. All proposed dedicated landscape irrigation laterals, if any, shall be identified on the approved landscape plans. Public landscape meters, if any, shall be completed and installed, and accounts transferred to the appropriate public agency, prior to the City’s acceptance of any public landscape improvements.

Real-Time Kinematics (RTK):

8. The Developer shall provide an RTK Survey of all new City-owned utilities (water, sewer, storm drain, etc.) installed. The survey shall incorporate horizontal and vertical Global Positioning System (GPS) readings taken at the following locations: at every fifty (50) foot interval along each new utility, every horizontal and vertical bend, every utility line crossing, and every utility appurtenance (valves, manholes, inlets, etc.). Each reading shall

Parkside
October 08, 2025

include two (2) shots; one measuring top of pipe and the other measuring elevation the final grade surface elevation directly on top of the pipe. The reading output for each shot shall be in rectangular coordinates (latitude and longitude in feet) and shall be referenced to stationing along the utility.

The RTK data shall be listed in a summary table (using Microsoft Excel, Version2007) with the following column headers: pipe stationing, latitude coordinate, longitudinal coordinate, general location comment (bend, crossing, etc.). The data shall be formatted to print in a portrait view. The coordinate system shall be in accordance with NAD 83 State Plan California Zone II. The RTK Survey data summary shall be updated weekly and submitted in hard copy. An updated electronic copy shall be made available to the City Engineer at any time during the project. Final hard and electronic copies shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to City acceptance.

AutoCAD Civil 3D Files:

9. The developer’s Civil Engineer shall provide, with final subdivision package submittal, AutoCAD files containing water, storm, and sewer utility layouts as shown on the approved submittal. AutoCAD files shall be provided in a file format no later than AutoCAD Civil 3D 2016.

Street Moratorium:

10. Please note that Hideaway Lane, Friendly Valley Lane, Spur Lane, Clementine Lane, and Passion Lane are designated moratorium streets. The developer shall repair impacts, per City Standard Detail S24, Detail S24.1, and City’s standard specifications, to Hideaway Lane, Friendly Valley Lane, Spur Lane, Clementine Lane, and Passion Lane related to, including, but not limited to: utility trenching, utility connections to the public main, driveway installation, curb, gutter and sidewalk install. All costs to repair moratorium streets, along the project frontages, shall be the sole responsibility of the developer.

Stormwater Quality Improvements:

11. The developer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan (Report) prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with currently accepted design standards. Water Quality Improvement Plans (WQIP) shall be integrated with the grading plans and included as part of the grading plans. Prior to final approval of the grading plans, the grading plans shall be found in conformance with the Project-Specific WQMP.

12. A Final Project-Specific WQMP shall be submitted to the City for approval with the grading plan check application and approved by the City of Fairfield Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The WQMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Site design BMP’s,
b. Source control BMP’s,
c. Pollutant control BMP’s,

Parkside
October 08, 2025

d. Long term operation and maintenance requirements, inspection and maintenance checklist;
e. Record a restrictive covenant to ensure operation, maintenance, funding, and transfer of requirements.
f. The post-construction best management practices (BMPs) outlined in the approved Final project-specific WQMP shall be incorporated in the grading/improvement plans.

13. The developer shall incorporate the use of Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices to address the issue of ongoing post-construction stormwater quality for the project site. Examples of LID treatment measures include: bio-retention, harvesting and reuse, infiltration, and evapo-transpiration. The project engineer is strongly recommended to contact the Public Works Department in regard to the new design requirements.

14. The Developer shall install thermoplastic markers on all new catch basins. Markers may be purchased at the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (FSSD) office. Contact the FSSD at 707-429-8930 for additional details.

15. Prior to execution of a subdivision improvement agreement, the Developer shall submit and have approved a maintenance access plan to the City of Fairfield Public Works Department demonstrating how maintenance activities for the Lot A water quality basin will be accomplished. The basin shall be fully enclosed with a continuous fence or other protective landscaping element constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Developer shall work with City staff to update the pertinent Community Facilities District (CFD) to ensure maintenance funding for the public basin is incorporated into the CFD.

Storm Water:

16. Storm drainage for the 15-year storm shall be collected on-site and conveyed through storm drains to the public storm drain system. Show the size and location of existing and proposed storm drains and catch basins on the site plan. Show the size and location of public storm drain lines and the proposed points of connection for the on-site storm drain system. Hydraulic calculations (Drainage Study) will be provided by the developer’s engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of improvement plans.

17. With the first submittal of a mass/rough grading plan, a drainage analysis shall be submitted to the City for approval demonstrating how the basin will function as a

Parkside
October 08, 2025

stormwater quality facility. Design criteria shall be consistent with the current design standards of the City of Fairfield.

Streetlights:

18. City standard LED streetlights shall be installed along the public streets of the proposed development and shall be energized under Pacific Gas & Electric’s (PG&E) LS-2 Flat Rate Tariff. The developer shall submit documents demonstrating that PG&E has received an application for the proposed improvements. Streetlight(s) specifications and installation shall be per the most current City of Fairfield Specifications and Details.

Please note that Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) requires the developer submit an application, separate from the City, to their offices, satisfying all their submittal requirements, in order to assign a streetlight number and energize the utility. City requires assignment of this streetlight number and for the energization to have occurred prior to final acceptance. Please contact the City Traffic Engineer at 707-428-3800 for more information.

19. Ornamental aluminum LED streetlights, if any, shall be installed within neighborhood areas. Ornamental streetlight assemblies shall be approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development prior to approval of the streetlight plan for review.

The Developer shall submit photometric data verifying the adequacy of the layout.

20. The developer shall be responsible for all improvements needed to provide a point of connection to energize proposed streetlights, including any necessary improvements to existing streetlight infrastructure. Improvements may include, but shall not be limited to:
conduit extensions, conduit replacement, additional electrical wiring, additional pullboxes, and existing pull box replacement. All costs necessary for both public and private streetlight improvements shall be borne solely by the developer.

21. Streetlight(s) specifications and installation shall follow the most current City of Fairfield Specifications and Details. With first package submittal to the Building Department, the developer shall submit photometric data verifying the adequacy of the proposed layout.

The developer's lighting design consultant shall furnish complete streetlight plans including: streetlight wattages, fixture details, streetlight numbers, and locations of pull boxes, streetlights and service points.

22. The Developer shall submit proof of application to PG&E, including the assigned application number, as part of the Engineering Plan Review submittal.

23. Existing streetlights along the frontage of the proposed development shall be replaced with streetlights that match the surrounding streetlights if damaged and with the approval of the City Engineer, or City Standard streetlights/relocated to behind the proposed sidewalk.

Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Frontage Improvements:

Parkside
October 08, 2025

24. The developer shall install City standard vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk along the frontage streets of Passion Lane and Gulf Drive. The width of the sidewalk from face of curb to back of walk shall be 5 feet.

25. Curbs on the project’s interior streets may be constructed as rolled curb, provided such is designed with through-curb drainage and is to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Developer shall provide construction details for all rolled curbing on plan sets and ensure drainage and freeboard is consistent with City standards.

Ponding shall not be allowed at any time.

26. The developer shall remove and replace damaged or nonstandard curb and gutter along the Passion Lane and Gulf Drive street frontages of the project. All rolled curbs within streets A, B, C and, Court A are shall not be the responsibility of the City. Contact the Public Works Department, concurrent with the Public Works encroachment permit application, to mark the existing curb and gutter along the project frontage that will need to be removed and replaced.

Streets:

27. Longitudinal grades shall be a minimum of 0.23% and a maximum of 10%.

28. Vertical curves are required at grade breaks exceeding 1%. Vertical curves shall be 100 feet minimum. Actual design of vertical curves shall be based on design speed and stopping sight distance.

29. The developer shall provide a Signing and Striping plan, designed by a registered Civil Engineer and included with the street improvement plans for the project.

30. Prior to the first building permit issuance, the developer shall provide wayfinding signage at the intersection of Passion Lane and Gulf Drive, or location as approved by the City Engineer, and shall include wayfinding towards the Linear Park and Village I Park.

31. The improvement plans shall incorporate traffic calming measures along the project’s frontage streets in accordance with City of Fairfield standards. To ensure safe and effective traffic management, especially on street segments with straightaways, a discussion regarding the addition of traffic calming features (such as horizontal displacement measures) shall take place with the City's engineering department. Recommendations from this discussion will be provided to the developer’s civil engineer, who must address these in their final submittal. Traffic calming measures must be clearly identified and included in the application site plan and map. The final design of these measures shall be reviewed and approved as part of the improvement plans by the City Engineer.

32. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit a Safe Route to School (SRS) study for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. The SRS study shall identify gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle routes to schools and propose how these gaps

Parkside
October 08, 2025

will be addressed with other developments. Prior to the first issuance of any certificates of occupancy, the developer shall complete all recommended improvements identified in the SRS study to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Monuments:

33. Monuments shall be installed per current City standards, including, but not limited to: at all intersections, angle points, and curves for all proposed public streets. Please refer to the current City standards for additional information.

Open Space, Public Safety and Park Maintenance Mello Roos District:

34. The parcel is currently annexed into Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 17 – Woodlake and, as such, will be subject to special assessments and taxes. These assessments provide funding for various elements of operations, maintenance, and services, including but not limited to:
• Maintenance of roads, roadways, sidewalks, including traffic signals, streetlights, and soundwalls
• Storm protection (storm drain) services
• Maintenance, repair, and replacement of parks, open space, and public landscaping • Maintenance of architectural amenities, public fences, or barriers in the public right-ofway • Any other public services authorized to be funded under Section 22500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Property owners within the District will be required to pay ongoing annual special assessments, which are subject to an annual inflation adjustment. Per the Developer’s request to change the parcel’s proposed land-use from a public school to residential, the developer shall work with City staff to prepare the necessary Engineer’s Report, technical studies, and supporting information required to reflect and document this change. These proposed CFD updates shall begin prior to execution of the subdivision improvement agreement for this development and shall be completed prior to issuance of the first building permit for this subdivision. For additional information, contact Christiana Lewis at (707) 428-7089.

Other Approvals:

35. Approvals from other agencies may be required for this project. Developer shall receive all necessary permits and/or authorizations from the respective regulatory agency prior to City’s issuance of any Building permits. Failure to receive all pertinent permits and/or authorizations, if any, shall result in the City placing a stop-work order on any ongoing construction until the appropriate permits are issued. Pertinent agencies may include, but shall not be limited to:
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife for any work within or in close proximity to any environmental areas.
• California Regional Water Quality Control Board to file a Notice of Intent (NOI) indicating your plans to initiate project grading.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

Pre-construction Meeting:

36. The contractor is required to schedule a pre-construction meeting with a City Public Works inspector at least 48 hours prior to starting work. Please call the inspection line at (707) 428-7558 to schedule a pre-construction meeting.

Improvement Agreements:

37. Prior to beginning construction of public improvements, the developer shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City. The developer shall furnish the necessary insurance, bonds and pay all fees associated with the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

Geotechnical Investigation:

38. The developer shall retain a registered Geotechnical Engineer to conduct a Geotechnical Investigation of the project area. Two (2) copies of the project Geotechnical Report shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to submittal of Construction Plans.

The Geotechnical Report shall include details and recommendations regarding the following:
• Grading Limitations and Requirements
• Foundation Design and Settlement
• Settlement
• Retaining Wall Design as Required
• Street Sections

39. The Geotechnical Report, any subsequent geotechnical recommendations, and grading plans shall be reviewed by an independent Geotechnical Engineer selected by the Department of Public Works. All costs associated with the independent review shall be borne by the developer. Conflicting recommendations from the developer’s Geotechnical Engineer and the independent reviewing Geotechnical Engineer shall be presented to both the developer and the City for consideration and resolution.

Grading:

40. A grading plan shall be prepared by the developer's Civil Engineer and submitted concurrent with improvement plan submittal to the Building Department. The following information shall be shown on the Grading Plan:
• Existing contours, landscaping, fences, buildings, or other improvements • Existing trees to be saved in place or removed
• Furnish all necessary details to clearly convey recommendations outlined in the project geotechnical investigation
• Cut/Fill interfaces and limits of grading
• Lot boundaries and road rights-of-way
• Proposed pad elevations, finished contours and lot grading details • Top of curb elevations

Parkside
October 08, 2025

• Perimeter cross-sections along all sides of the project to show the proposed project’s interface with abutting properties and streets • Plan view of proposed drainage facilities including storm drains, catch basins, manholes and underdrains
• Details for proposed curb and gutter

41. The Project Engineer shall coordinate grading design closely with the project Geotechnical Engineer. Specifically, the Geotechnical Engineer shall be consulted to evaluate and address issues related to:
• Retaining Wall Design Parameters.
• Fills and Potential for Settlement
• Special Treatment at Cut/Fill Interfaces
• Street Pavement Sections

42. The grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the project Geotechnical Engineer prior to City approval. Provide a signature block for the project Geotechnical Engineer on the plan. The Geotechnical Engineer shall sign the plans prior to issuance of any Grading permits.

43. Slope grading shall comply with the Geotechnical Report. Slopes steeper than 3H:1V shall not be allowed in the public right-of-way. Slopes steeper than 2H:1V shall not be allowed on-site.

44. Prior to the City’s issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the City shall receive a selfcertification by the Engineer of Record (Registered Civil Engineer) which certifies that the project’s grading, drainage and stormwater treatment systems conform to the approved plans, permits and city codes. The self-certification shall be performed during construction and upon completion of the project by the Engineer of Record and documented on the appropriate city form.

45. Retaining walls over 18 inches tall shall be concrete or masonry. Retaining walls over 4 feet tall shall be designed by a Civil or Structural Engineer.

46. City-maintained drainage facilities located outside of city right-of-way shall be accompanied with proper public drainage easements to be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded on a city-approved format.

Dust Control:

47. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the developer shall work cooperatively with Public Works staff to implement a Dust Control Monitoring program and agree on appropriate thresholds and mitigation measures to address dust. The Dust Control Monitoring program shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer or a designated representative.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

Erosion Control:

48. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be included as a part of the grading plan package. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by the developer's Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. The erosion control plan shall include protection measures such as: sedimentation basins, check dams, straw wattles and hydroseeding details.

49. The project shall comply with the requirements of the most current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued to the Fairfield-Suisun Urban Runoff Management Program.

50. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits for storm water discharges, including but not limited to the State Water Resources Control Board Construction General Permit.

Developers whose projects disturb one or more acres of soil or whose projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, shall obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (State Water Resources Control Board Construction General Permit, 99-08-DWQ). Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation, but does not include regular maintenance activities performed to restore the original line, grade, or capacity of the facility.

51. The Developer shall be responsible for developing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Fairfield.

52. To limit pollutant generation, discharge and runoff to the maximum extent practicable, the project shall include stormwater pollution control measures listed within the document entitled “Storm Water Pollution Control Measures List”. This list is provided within Appendix B of the document entitled “Storm Water Requirements for Development Projects- Packet for Project Developers”. Each identified source of pollutants may have one or more appropriate control measures as determined by the City of Fairfield.

Water System:

53. Developers shall reimburse Fairfield Municipal Utility for any engineering/consultant costs borne by the City as a result of this project.

54. A hydraulic water model shall be prepared. Based on the results of the model, the Developer shall design, construct, and conform to a Master Utility Plan prepared for the overall project.

55. Water mains serving more than 100 lots, or more than two fire hydrants, shall be looped and connected to the existing water system in at least two locations.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

56. The developer shall install a separate water service to each parcel. Water services to each parcel shall be separately metered. The size and location of all services shall be shown on the improvement plans.

57. Proposed domestic water and irrigation services, within the public right-of-way, shall be constructed per current City Standard Details and Specifications.

58. Show the size and location of existing and proposed water services, meters and backflow prevention devices on the site plan. Show the size and location of water mains and the proposed points of connection for water services.

59. With the exception of water meters and meter boxes, if any water facilities on the site side utilize a reduced pressure backflow prevention device (including the backflow preventor) it shall be privately maintained by the property owner.

Water utilities between the public water main and the first structure off the public main (water meter, double detector check valve) shall be maintained by the City.

60. Irrigation services shall be stubbed to all landscaped areas. Irrigation and electrical control wire sleeves shall be installed as needed. Coordinate with the project Landscape Architect.

Sleeves shall be at least 12 inches below subgrade at any driveway, sidewalk, or any proposed hardscape crossings.

Fire System:

61. The City of Fairfield Fire Department requires issuance of an underground fire line permit for any private water lines, separate from permits issued by the Building or Public Works Department. Fire hydrants shall be installed along all public streets. Additional fire hydrants may be required along public street frontages. Hydrant spacing and locations shall be per current City standards and approved by both the Departments of Fire and Public Works.

Developer shall submit an application, shop drawings, all necessary documents to the Fairfield Fire Department for their review and approval.

62. Show the size and location of proposed fire lines, hydrants, fire sprinkler risers and backflow prevention devices on the plan. Show the size and location of water mains and the proposed points of connection for fire lines.

63. If a backflow preventor is required on dedicated fire lines, an above grade double check detector check valve is required on lines which serve building fire sprinklers. Specify the manufacturer, size and location of the fire line backflow preventor.

64. Coordinate with the City of Fairfield’s Fire Department to determine any required fire flow requirements for the project. Depending on the results of the fire flow modeling additional conditions of approval such as upsizing of existing pipes, extension of pipes, installation of parallel piping or installation of pumps, at the developer’s cost, may be required.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

Sewer System:

65. Proposed sewer services, within the public right-of-way, shall be constructed per current City Standard Details and Specifications.

66. Show the size and location of existing and proposed sewer laterals and cleanouts on the site plan. Show the size and location of sewer mains and the proposed points of connection for sewer laterals.

67. Sewer laterals shall be stubbed to all parcels, except where determined as not required for service (i.e. Open Space parcels). The size and location of laterals shall be shown on the improvement plans.

Storm Drain System:

68. With the first submittal of a mass/rough grading plan, the Developer shall provide a Hydrology & Hydraulics Reports prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with currently accepted design standards. The report shall show all existing and proposed onsite and/or offsite public and/or private drainage facilities intended to discharge the runoff.

The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of the drainage facilities.

Runoff from the development or partial phase of development of the property shall meet the following criteria:
a. Developer shall be responsible for mitigating impacts created to changes in drainage runoff course or quantity, for both on-site and off-site drainage, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b. Do not significantly exceed the existing natural discharge quantities. c. Street storm flows shall not exceed top of curb for the 10-year storm event. d. Must contain storm flows within the street right-of-way for the 100-year event. e. All inlets, outlets, pipes, channels, basins, etc. must be capable of conveying the 100-year storm.
f. Sump conditions shall be designed to convey the 100-year storm flows g. Secondary emergency escape path shall be provided.
h. If the project discharges/connects to an off-site detention basin, provide permission to drain/connect from the owner of basin or system. All detention measures shall have positive drainage with a minimum 48-hr draw-down time and be empty within 72 hours.
i. Standing water is not permitted.

The Hydrology & Hydraulics Reports must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the precise grading permit.

69. Developer shall connect proposed storm drainage utilities to existing public infrastructure per current City Standards and Specifications. Direct connections to public infrastructure

Parkside
October 08, 2025

shall not be allowed and connections shall only be at existing or proposed storm drain structures.

70. Storm drainage for the 15-year storm shall be collected on-site and conveyed through storm drains to the public storm drain system. Show the size and location of existing and proposed storm drains and catch basins on the site plan. Show the size and location of public storm drain lines and the proposed points of connection for the on-site storm drain system.

71. Grading and drainage shall be designed so that surplus drainage (above and beyond that of the 15-year storm) not collected in site catch basins, is directed overland so as not to jeopardize existing or proposed buildings with flooding.

72. Prior to the recordation of the final map, storm drain easements and maintenance roads shall be provided for all public storm drains, water quality basins, and/or ditches that are located on private property. The developer shall be responsible for the cost of acquisition of all storm drain easements required for the construction and maintenance of all offsite drainage improvements.

Landscaping:

73. The project architect and engineer shall coordinate design closely with the project landscape designer to evaluate and address issues related to:
• Fencing/wall layout and details
• Irrigation points of connection to the public water main • Locations and sizes for irrigation services
• Locations, depths and sizes for irrigation and control wire sleeves at driveways and street crossings
• Sight distance constraints for fencing and landscaping i. Landscape plans shall include sight-visibility triangles designed per City Standard Detail T1.
• Depth of cover and tree setbacks over water, sewer and storm drain lines in landscape areas

74. Landscaping plans shall be prepared by a registered Landscape Architect. Landscaping and irrigation plans shall be designed to comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. Use of turf and other water intensive landscaping shall be minimized.

Park Sites:

75. Parkside is required to dedicate 0.85 acres of parkland per the City of Fairfield Ordinance No. 1995-14 and Ordinance No. 2006-03. The approved conceptual Landscape Plan (dated July 03, 2025) provides 0.0 acres of qualifying parkland. The required parkland requirements and in-lieu fee contribution is 0.85 acres required with $212,500 in-lieu fee contribution.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

If the Developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the fee must be paid before the first building permit is issued. If the Developer elects to dedicate qualifying parkland, land dedication shall be complete and confirmed on the final map, prior to final map approval, or via an equivalent formal document. The total dedication of parkland shall all be owned and maintained by the city and fully open to the public and any design must meet city standards and guidelines as set forth in the Fairfield Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and city standard details.

If the Development Agreement is amended to include Parkside, the Development Agreement will supersede the conditioned park requirements for Parkside.

Parking:

76. A minimum of one on-street parking space, 20 feet in length measured along the curb (or as identified by the most current version of the CA MUTCD), shall be provided within 200 feet of each single-family lot. The developer shall furnish a parking diagram to demonstrated that the proposed lot and street layout will provide adequate parking in development areas with narrow lot frontages (less than 50 feet in width), or in areas where cul-de-sacs are predominant.

Subdivision Map and Easements:

77. All property lines, easements and right-of-way dedications shall be shown on the improvement plans. Water, sewer, and storm drain easements shall be dedicated to the City for any public utilities on private property.

78. Public Service Easements, no less than 8 -feet-wide, shall be granted to the City by the Developer along internal streets A,B, and C as shown on the approved Parkside Preliminary Tentative Subdivision Map, dated July 03, 2025.

79. There may be several existing easements located within the project parcels, including, but not limited to:
• 10-foot Public service Easement along the northerly and westerly property line No permanent structures will be allowed within the easement, in addition to possible restrictions to any landscaping and/or fencing.

80. The developer shall furnish documents to the City Public Works Department, for review, to vacate any easements that are unused. All documents vacating unnecessary easements shall be approved by the City and recorded with Solano County prior to issuance of any Building permits. Please note, the developer shall also contact and receive approval from existing utility stakeholders to vacate the existing Public Utility Easements. Stakeholders may include, and may not be limited to: AT&T, PG&E, Comcast, etc.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

81. Developer shall submit a title report, current within the past 90 days, to the City Public Works Department, concurrent with the first submittal to the Building Department for development review. In addition to a paper copy, the developer shall submit the title report in PDF format, including hyperlinks to the pertinent documents, on a USB flash drive or via e-mail to [email protected].

82. Concurrent with first improvement package submittal to the Building Department, the developer shall submit a draft Tract Map to the City for review and approval. Building permits shall not be issued prior to recordation of a Final Tract Map with Solano County.

Developer shall furnish to the City of Fairfield appropriate fees to garner a mylar copy of the County-recorded map.

83. The Tract map shall be prepared in accordance with the State Map Act and all local ordinances.

84. Upon recordation, or similar event legally recognizing the new tract map, the developer shall notify the City that the tract map is now complete and shall work with City staff to update addressing for any water meter, sewer cleanout, or similar facility.

85. All information shown on the map shall be directly verifiable by information shown on the closure calculation printout. The point of beginning shall be clearly identified and all lot acreage shall be shown and verifiable from information shown on the closure calculation printout. Additionally, the square footage of each lot shall be shown on the subdivision map. Appropriate easements shall be provided for public facilities located on private property.

86. Prior to approval of any final maps, the developer shall pay the City a fee to be used to purchase a recorded mylar copy of the map from the county.

87. The subdivider shall negotiate the abandonment of currently held City easements and dedications with the Department of Public Works.

88. Street easements and other public rights-of-way inside and outside the project limits which are necessary to serve the project shall be dedicated to the City.

89. Closure calculations shall be submitted with the initial map. All calculated points within the map shall be based upon one common set of coordinates. All information shown on the map shall be directly verifiable by information shown on the closure calculation printout.

The point of beginning shall be clearly identified and all lot acreage shall be shown and verifiable from information shown on the closure calculation printout. Additionally, the square footage of each lot shall be shown on the subdivision map. Appropriate easements shall be provided for public facilities located on private property

90. All property lines and easements shall be shown on the site plan.

Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District
1010 Chadbourne Road ● Fairfield, California 94534 ● (707) 429-8930 ● www.fssd.com 3/13/2025

MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Fairfield Community Development Department
ATTN: Elizabeth Cobb, Meily Sheehan
FROM: Kyle Broughton
SUBJECT: Parkside – Villages at Fairfield, APN No. 0170-010-052 ZC2025-003, TS2020-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-004
77 Lot Single-Family Unit Subdivision
In response to the application for the project named above, the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (FSSD) provides the following comments:
1) All FSSD fees applicable to the proposed project are required to be paid upon issuance of a building permit, including but not limited to capacity fees, plan check fees, encroachment, and inspection.

Please send your comments directly to Kyle Broughton ([email protected]) or at:

Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District
1010 Chadbourne Road
Fairfield, CA  94534-9700
Sent via email

Agenda Item No.: H.1

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: October 8, 2025
TO: Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Community and Economic Development Department
SUBJECT: Resolution PC2025-07 Parkside General Plan Amendment, Environmental Impact Report Addendum, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Development Review Recommending the City Council Approve a General Plan Amendment from Public Facilities (PF) to Residential Medium (RM) and a Corresponding Zone Change from Public Facilities (PF) to Residential Medium (RM), and an Addendum (ER2025-0024) to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2004032064); and Granting a Tentative Subdivision Map and Development Review Approval to Subdivide a Vacant 7.99-Acre Site Located East of Passion Lane, South of Gulf Drive, and North of the Linear Park Trail (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN]: 0170- 010-052) for Parkside, a Project Consisting of 76 Single-Family Units and Associated Infrastructure; and Granting an Amendment to the Villages at Fairfield Community Design Guidelines
A public hearing on the request of Rob White from Rancho Tolenas Corporation (Applicant or RTC), to develop 76 single-family residential units on an approximately 7.99-acres vacant property located east of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Linear Park Trail (APN 0170-010-052). The Project has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164 to the certified Villages at Fairfield EIR.

Contact:

Contract Planner: Daria Young, (714) 453-4316, [email protected] City Contact: Meily M Sheehan, (707) 428-7474, [email protected]

PROJECT RECORD
Resolution No.: PC2025-07
File No.: General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002); Zone Change (ZC2025-003); Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-002); Development Review Single-Family (DR2025-005); Environmental Review (ER2025-0024)

Location: East of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Fairfield Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170–010-052)
Applicant: Rob White, Lewis Management Corp.

Owner: Rancho Tolenas Corporation

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommend that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC2025-07, approving the Tentative Subdivision Map and Development Review applications and recommending City Council approve the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Environmental Review.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Rob White of Rancho Tolenas Corporation requests a General Plan Amendment from Public Facilities (PF) to Residential Medium (RM) to support the development of 76 single-family residential units on a vacant 7.99-acre parcel east of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Fairfield Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170–010-052).

DISCUSSION
Background: The Applicant is proposing the Parkside Project (Project) as an extension of the Villages at Fairfield (VAF) Master Plan, a master-planned community approved in 2005 in the City’s northeastern area. The VAF Master Plan was originally designed to support the development of up to 2,327 residential units and 311,000 square feet of commercial space distributed across four designated areas known as the Villages (I-IV).

The Project is situated at the southeast corner of Gulf Drive and Passion Lane and covers approximately 7.99 acres within Village I of the VAF Master Plan. It is bounded by existing residential developments to the north and west, a two-acre parcel owned by the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District (FSUSD) and Village I park to the east, and Fairfield Linear Park to the south.

The Project site was designated PF by the City to allow for the potential future development of a school. However, the designation does not obligate or guarantee development, as school site decisions rest solely with the FSUSD. In 2022, the District informed the Applicant that it does not need the property and does not intend to construct a school at this location. The District has consistently confirmed this determination over the past three years. It is also important to note that the FSUSD owns a separate 2-acre parcel directly east of the Project site. The City has engaged the District in discussions about potentially acquiring this parcel to expand the planned 5-acre Village 1 neighborhood park currently being designed at the southwest corner of Gulf Drive and Portland Drive.

The Applicant is seeking to make a fifth revision to the VAF Master Plan. Since 2005, the VAF Master Plan has been amended four times, altering the development to reflect current residential market considerations. As depicted in Table I, the proposed revised VAF Master Plan

would include 2,268 residential dwelling units amongst five Villages, including the development of 76 single-family homes within Parkside.

Table 1. Comparison of 2005 VAF Master Plan to Proposed 2025 VAF Master Plan Village
Approved 2005 VAF
Master Plan
Proposed 2025 VAF
Master Plan
Change
Unit
Count
Gross
Acreage
(AC)
Unit
Count
Gross
Acreage
(AC)
Unit
Count
Gross
Acreage
(AC)
Village 1 832 97.0 432 91.5 -400 -5.5
Village 2 269 89.0 374 85.5 +105 -3.5
Village 3 1,147 138.0 906 140.2 -241 +2.2
Village 4 79 96.0 480 133.6 +401 +0.3
Parkside -- -- 76 7.6 +76 +7.6
TOTAL 2,327 420.0 2,268 458.4 -59 +38.4
The VAF Master Plan entitlement history is summarized below:

Villages at Fairfield
 September 20, 2005 – City Council adopted Resolution 2005-296, certifying the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Resolution 2005-297, approving a General Plan Amendment for the Project, and Ordinance 2005-15 amending the Zoning Code, and adopted Ordinance 2005-14 approving a Development Agreement of the Villages at Fairfield. The EIR evaluated 2,327 residential units, approximately 311,000 square feet of commercial uses, an elementary school, parks, and other public facilities, including roadways, sewers, stormwater detention basins, and other utilities over 433 acres.  August 10, 2015 – The council adopted Resolution 2015-245, adopting an Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR in conjunction with its approval of the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement. The second Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR revised the total unit count to 1,830 units across all Villages.  January 15, 2019 – The council adopted Resolution 2019-14, adopting an Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR in conjunction with its First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement. The third Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR did not revise the total unit count within the Villages. Minor changes to the timing of Mitigation Measures were approved.
 September 2, 2025 – The council adopted Resolution 2025-174, adopting an Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR and the Hawthorne Mill EIR in conjunction with the approval of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to support the addition of the Lago Vista project, a fifth residential ‘Village’ to the overall VAF Master Plan.

The evaluation of the proposed Project is subject to the underlying VAF Master Plan approvals and the respective CEQA certification. This 2025 Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield EIR has been prepared pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 for the Project.

As outlined in the entitlement history, a Development Agreement (DA) exists between the City and the Applicant, establishing the terms for the overall project and associated off-site improvements. An amendment to the DA is required to support the proposed Parkside Project and is included as a condition of Project approval. This DA Amendment will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for future review and consideration. The amendment will address several key components, including an updated development plan, infrastructure timing and funding, revised park and open space calculations, impact fees, inclusionary housing provisions, and the overall agreement term. Additional information can be found in the attached Term Letter between the City and the Applicant (Attachment 4).

Project Site Information:

A. Location: East of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Fairfield Linear Park Trail (APN 0170–010-052).

B. Parcel Size: 7.99 AC
C. Zoning and Land Use:

Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Land Use
Project Site Public Facilities (PF) Residential Medium
(RM)
Undeveloped
North Residential Low Medium
(RLM:4.5)
N/A Single-family
Residential
South Recreation (REC) followed by
Residential Low Medium
(RLM:4.5)
N/A Fairfield Linear
Park Trail
East Recreation (REC) N/A Undeveloped
West Residential Low Medium
(RLM:4.5)
N/A Single-family
Residential
D. General Plan Designations:

Existing GP Designation Proposed GP Designation
Project Site Public Facilities Residential Medium (RM)
North Residential-Low Medium N/A
South Recreation (Linear Park Trail) followed
by Residential Low Medium
N/A
East Recreation N/A
West Residential-Low Medium N/A

E. Site Characteristics/Special Features: The Project site is currently undeveloped. It is situated at the southeast corner of Gulf Drive and Passion Lane. It is bounded by existing residential developments to the north and west, a two-acre parcel owned by the FSUSD and Village I park to the east, and Fairfield Linear Park to the south. The Project site is relatively flat, and a detention water basin is located along the southern boundary.

Project Description: The proposed Project is approximately 7.99 acres and includes 76 singlefamily residential units and a pollinator garden (approximately 0.35 SF) that will include public bench seating. The Project requires approval for the following discretionary actions: General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Subdivision Map, Development Review, and Environmental Review. Additionally, the Project aims to amend the Design Guidelines of the Villages at Fairfield Master Plan to include Parkside.

The proposed residential units are planned on lot sizes of 50 by 55 feet and are available in four distinct layout configurations. Floor plans range from 1,654 to 2,195 square feet, each featuring three bedrooms and two bathrooms as standard. Larger units offer the option for a fourth bedroom or a loft. Every home includes a two-car garage and driveway space for up to two additional vehicles. Each unit also features a private, fenced backyard, providing outdoor space for personal use and privacy.

A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are proposed to adjust land use designations and zoning classifications to accommodate the Project's target densities and allow for residential development. The General Plan Amendment will remove the Public Facility (PF) land use designation and will replace it with the Residential Medium (RM) land use designation. Likewise, the Zone Change will remove the current PF zoning classification and replace it with an RM zoning classification.

The proposed Project includes several improvements to pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The existing 8.5-foot-wide sidewalks along Passion Lane and Gulf Drive will be maintained; however, a 4-foot-wide tree well with metal grates will be integrated into the walkway design. These modifications will result in an effective walking surface of approximately 6 feet, consistent with the sidewalk width on the opposite side of the street. Additionally, the existing vertical face curbs along Passion Lane and Gulf Drive will be removed and replaced with rolled curbs and gutters to enhance accessibility and streetscape aesthetics. Within the interior of the Project site, all proposed sidewalks will be 5-feet in width and will also incorporate rolled curbs and gutters to maintain design consistency throughout the development.

A. Development Standards:

Required Proposed
Dwelling Units N/A 76
Gross Area (AC) 3 7.99
Density (DU/AC) 8 to 15 9.5
Lot Coverage 60% maximum 55%

Parking
On-Site Parking
Requirement
1 covered, 1 uncovered for homes larger than 960 square feet Onsite 152 266
Offsite Parking
Requirement
1 uncovered space per dwelling
Offsite 76 83
Setbacks
Front
To porch 10’ 8’ minimum from back-of-walk
To living area 10’ 8’ minimum from back-of-walk
To garage
18’ minimum from back-ofwalk if straight garage; 8’
minimum to forward garage
door if staggered garage
18-21.5’ for straight garage;
8’ to forward garage door for
staggered garage
Interior Setback
Interior 5’ minimum 5’
Street Side 5’ minimum 8’ minimum
Street yard at curb
return
6’ minimum 6’ minimum
Rear Setback
Living Area 5’ minimum 5.5’-6’
California Room 5’ minimum 5.5’-6’
Open Space
Public Space 280 sf 350 sf
Common Open Space
Three (3) percent of net
Project area
.35 acres1
Source: Table 25-5: RLM, RM, and RH Small Lot Development Regulations 1 Detention basins and stormwater quality features may not be counted towards common open space requirements unless usable for active recreational purposes. Applicant has agreed to address overall VAF park and open space calculations through a Development Agreement amendment, as outlined in the attached Term Letter.

Analysis for Planning Commission:

A. General Plan/Zoning Consistency: The Project site currently has a General Plan and Zoning designations of PF. To facilitate the Project proposal, the Applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to redesignated the site to RM. As designed and conditioned, the Project is consistent with the requested RM land use designation.

The Project was reviewed and approved by the Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). Under state law, ALUC is responsible for preparing and adopting airport land use plans to ensure land use compatibility with public and military airports.

In accordance with this authority, ALUC has adopted a compatibility plan for Travis Air

Force Base. Because the Project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zoning change, it was subject to review under ALUC’s compatibility plan. On August 14, 2025, ALUC found the Project to be consistent and adopted Resolution 25-08 (Attachment 5).

Furthermore, the Project is also consistent with the following General Plan objectives:
 Policy LU-1. Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, well-balanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city’s scale, services, and surrounding environment.
 Objective LU-1.1. Orderly Growth. Promote and prioritize orderly development and growth of Fairfield through the following: Promote infill development that makes efficient use of limited land supply, while ensuring compatibility and integration with adjacent uses. Maintain separation of urban and rural uses, including through maintaining strong urban growth boundaries; Any urban development requiring basic municipal services shall occur only within the urban boundaries established by the General Plan. Ensure that new development mitigates and provides for its fair share of impacts to the environment, public facilities, services, and infrastructure.  Policy LU-7. Enhance and improve the built environment in Fairfield through site design that emphasizes cohesive, compact, connected, and “human-scaled” development, defined as neighborhoods, places, and streetscapes focused on the needs and experience of people.
 Objective LU-7.1. Urban Design Standards. Develop and maintain urban design standards for specific areas or development types that focus on human-scale proportions to create an engaging and visually pleasing streetscape. Support community and public realm design that reflects the community’s diversity and meets the needs of persons of all ages and abilities.
 Objective LU-7.6: Pedestrian-Oriented Connections. Provide a network of safe, wellmaintained, interconnected streets, paseos, pathways, and bicycle routes onsite that facilitates travel through the site for pedestrians, cyclists, and other nonmotorized modes of transportation. Link these connections to amenities such as commercial corridors, parks, schools, and public transportation hubs.  Policy LU-16. Ensure that new development is designed to optimize Fairfield’s Linear Park, making the park a central feature that enhances quality of life, connectivity, and recreational opportunities for residents.
 Objective LU-16.3. Eyes on the Trail. Avoid blank facades along the trail. Windows, doors and transparent openings are encouraged to provide “eyes on the trail” and heighten sense of security. To the extent feasible, surface and structured parking should not front onto the trail.
 Policy PFS-7. Provide an adequate supply of quality water and water infrastructure to support current and future population and employment growth, as well as focused support of the region’s agritourism goals.

 Objective PFS-7.7. New Development. Require all new development located within City limits connect to the public water system, construct all potable water lines serving such development, and provide adequate funding for the development’s use of all potable water infrastructure and facilities.
 Policy PFS-8. Ensure provision of superior wastewater collection and treatment facilities to support current and future growth.
 Objective PFS-8.4. New Development. Require that all new development located within City limits connect to the public wastewater collection system, construct all sanitary sewer lines serving such development (including oversizing of sewers if requested by the Fairfield Suisun Sewer District or the City, and provide adequate funding for the development’s use of all wastewater infrastructure and facilities.

The costs of oversizing shall be borne by the beneficiary of the oversizing.  Policy HS-2. Prevent urban fires and protect the community from wildfire danger.  Objective HS-2.4: Fire Department Review. Ensure the Fire Department has opportunity to review and provide appropriate conditions prior to Project approval.

Incorporate Fire Department input on longer-range plans related to water supply and water systems, transportation Projects, and utilities.

B. Development Review: The proposed 76 single-family residential units are planned on lot sizes of 50 by 55 feet and are available in four distinct layout configurations. Floor plans range from 1,654 to 2,195 square feet, each featuring three bedrooms and two bathrooms as standard.

Larger units offer optional enhancements, including a fourth bedroom or a loft. Every home includes a two-car garage and driveway space for up to two additional vehicles. Each unit also features a private, fenced backyard, providing outdoor space for personal use and privacy.

The Applicant has submitted “placeholder” architectural plans to illustrate typical architecture and building footprints proposed for the Parkside development. Future home builders will have the option to either use these plans or submit new architectural plans, subject to substantial conformance review with the city code and the VAF Design Guidelines.

In addition to the residential lots, the Project includes Lot A, designated for water quality purposes. Lot A will function as a stormwater management basin serving the entire Project, collecting and treating runoff from the single-family residential areas. The basin will be dedicated to the City for ongoing maintenance through the City’s Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (LLMD). The area will be landscaped with a drought-tolerant pollinator garden and enhanced with public bench seating and educational signage, creating a feature that is both functional and passively enjoyable for residents.

As a part of the Project package, revisions to the existing VAF Community Design Guidelines are proposed to reflect the Parkside project. These guidelines establish design consistency for streets, parks and open spaces, landscaping, walls and fences, signage, and architecture throughout the VAF master plan. The Applicant has included proposed Parkside revisions as

redlines in Attachment 7, as part of this development review package. A comprehensive update to the guidelines will be included with the future DA Amendment.

The Project site can be accessed via two roadways; both located off Passion Lane on the western boundary. These access roads are designed to accommodate emergency vehicles, with adequate turn radius for fire trucks already assessed. Each unit in the Project offers up to four private parking spaces, with an additional 83 spaces offered on the street, totaling 349 parking spaces in the development.

The buildings within the Project adhere to safety standards with comprehensive environmental reviews ensuring that all impacts have been previously analyzed under the certified EIR for the Villages at Fairfield. Therefore, the project does not cause new, or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously analyzed.

As proposed and conditioned, the Project aligns with the City's General Plan objectives by promoting orderly growth, new housing opportunities, and pedestrian-oriented connections.

The proposed development complements the surrounding community with its design, blending seamlessly into the natural environment while adhering to fire protection standards and incorporating the safe routes to schools initiatives. Overall, the Parkside development is a well-planned continuation to Village I of the Villages at Fairfield Master Plan, providing new housing for the community while meeting all applicable standards and guidelines.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Addendum to a previously certified EIR has been prepared for the Project, as allowed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Since all potential environmental impacts were already studied in certified EIR for the Villages at Fairfield, and no new significant impacts have been identified, a new EIR is not required. The Addendum, included as Attachment 10, provides a detailed technical analysis and explains this conclusion with supporting evidence in accordance with CEQA guidelines.

CORRESPONDENCE
A public hearing notice was published in the Daily Republic newspaper on September 21, 2025, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Project site, as well as all property owners within Village 1, including properties east of Clay Bank Road, north of the Linear Park, south of Manuel Campos Parkway, and west of Portland Drive. The City also received email correspondence from a resident providing comments on the Project proposal, which included a link to an online petition with additional comments collected as of this writing (Attachment 13).

COORDINATED WITH
Public Works Department, Fire Department, Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, and Pacific Gas & Electric

STAFF CONTACT
Meily M Sheehan, Planning Division Manager
(707) 428-7474
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution with attached
Attachment 3: Exhibit A—Conditions of Approval
Attachment 4: Development Agreement Term Letter Dated August 4, 2025 Attachment 5: Solano County Airport Land Use Commission Resolution 25-08, dated August 14, 2025
Attachment 6: Proposed General Plan and Zoning Exhibits Attachment 7: Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines, dated September 17, 2025 Attachment 8: Tentative Subdivision Map, Villages at Fairfield – Parkside, dated Revised July 3, 2025
Attachment 9: Project Plans, Architecture, dated January 31, 2025 Attachment 10:CEQA Addendum for the Villages at Fairfield Project, dated September 2025 Attachment 11:Villages at Fairfield Parkside Transportation Impact Analysis, dated August 11, 2025
Attachment 12:EIR Addendum Biological Summary for Parkside Development Project, dated February 4, 2025
Attachment 13: Public Comments

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 1 PROJECT: PARKSIDE

CITY OF FAIRFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC2025-07

RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM PUBLIC

FACILITIES (PF) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) AND A CORRESPONDING ZONE CHANGE FROM PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM), AND AN ADDENDUM (ER2025-0024) TO THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH 2004032064); AND

GRANTING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT 7.99-ACRE SITE LOCATED EAST OF PASSION LANE, SOUTH OF GULF DRIVE, AND NORTH OF THE LINEAR PARK TRAIL (APN: 0170-010-052) FOR PARKSIDE, A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 76 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE; AND

GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY DESIGN

GUIDELINES
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. On February 11, 2025, applications for a General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002), Zone Change (ZC2025-003), Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-002), Development Review Single Family (DR2025-005), Environmental Review (ER2025-0024), and an amendment to the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines for proposed 76 single-family residential units located east of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170-010-052) (the Project) were properly filed with the Department of Community Development in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the official filing of such applications.

Section 2. The Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on October 8, 2025.

The City staff presented substantial factual information regarding the proposed Project in staff reports and through oral presentations before the Commission. The Planning Commission considered all public testimony and information presented during the public hearing regarding this application.

Section 3. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (ER2025-004) (2025 Addendum or ER2025-004) for the Project and all comments received, and has determined that the following findings support the adoption of the EIR Addendum, to wit:
(a) Based on the whole record before it, the Commission hereby finds and determines that the proposed Project, including the change in land use designation and zoning of 7.99 acres, and the addition of 76 residential units, will not result in new significant adverse impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. The 2025 Addendum appropriately incorporates all relevant mitigation measures from the VAF EIR to mitigate previously identified impacts to a less than significant level consistent with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164. Therefore, the existing EIRs along with the Addendum adequately address

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 2 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
the potential environmental impacts of the Parkside Project, and no further environmental review is required.

Section 4. The commission adopts the following findings in recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests:
(a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. The proposed Parkside subdivision is consistent with the proposed amendment to the City’s General Plan, which designates the area for Residential Medium (RM) development. This designation is intended for single-family housing, that is serviced by recreational activities and enhanced walkability. This subdivision fulfills this through the development of 76 single-family residential units, and its proximity to the Fairfield Linear Park trail and the proposed Village I park. The proposed subdivisions’ design and improvement provisions align with several key General Plan policies and objectives: Objective LU-2.1 (Consistency with Density Ranges) The proposed 9.5 density development is consistent with the prescribed 9.0 to

18.0 density ranges in the General Plan. The Project’s layout and design ensure that residential density is managed effectively, complying with the medium density residential requirements; Policy LU-1 (Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, well-balanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city’s scale, services, and surrounding environment) The subdivision is part of the Villages Master Plan, a series of thoughtfully planned communities. The size and design of the subdivision are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the master-planned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-2 (Promote a variety of housing types to serve the diverse needs of the community and stimulate investment) The Project builds 76 small-lot single-family homes, a less common housing type within Fairfield’s traditional single-family neighborhoods. This addition contributes to greater housing diversity and supports the City's goals for a balanced and inclusive housing mix; and Policy LU-16: (Ensure that new development is designed to optimize Fairfield’s Linear Park, making the park a central feature that enhances quality of life, connectivity, and recreational opportunities for residents) The Project is located adjacent to the Fairfield Linear Park, offering residents convenient access. Housing along the southern boundary of the Project site is oriented toward the trail, with windows providing natural surveillance and "eyes on the trail." This design enhances safety, encourages passive monitoring, and promotes interaction between residents and trail users, fostering a more active and welcoming public space; (b) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed amendments would redesignate 7.99-acres of vacant land for 76 single-family residential units. The addition of more residential land will not jeopardize public interest, health, safety, convenience, or the welfare of the City in that the planned development will be subject to a collection of conditions of approval to ensure its safe and orderly development and operation. Future access to the site is provided via Passion Lane;

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 3 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
(c) The site is physically suitable (including, but not limited to access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/developments. The Parkside subdivision site has been thoroughly assessed and found ideal for residential development. The site is served by existing streets and utilities such as water, sewer, electricity, and road networks, which are sufficient to support the new development's increased demand. The pre-existing infrastructure ensures that residents will have access to all essential services. The site’s relatively flat topography requires minimal grading and thus will preserve the natural landscape. Additionally, the Projects development plan intentionally avoids impacting sensitive habitats as much as possible;
(d) The proposed amendment is in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Addendum to the previously certified Villages at Fairfield EIR has been prepared for the Project, as permitted under CEQA. The Addendum determined that all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project were previously analyzed in the certified EIRs. No new significant impacts have been identified; therefore, no further environmental review is required.

Section 5. The Planning Commission adopts the following findings in support of the Tentative Subdivision Map request:
(a) The proposed subdivision, together with the provision for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City's General Plan in that the General Plan designates the area development. The proposed Parkside subdivision is consistent with the proposed amendment to the City’s General Plan, which designates the area for Residential Medium (RM) development. This designation is intended for single-family housing, that is serviced by recreational activities and enhanced walkability. This subdivision fulfills this through the development of 76 single-family residential units, and its proximity to the Fairfield Linear Park trail and the proposed Village I park. The proposed subdivisions’ design and improvement provisions align with several key General Plan policies and objectives:

Objective LU-2.1 (Consistency with Density Ranges) The proposed 9.5 density development is consistent with the prescribed 9.0 to 18.0 density ranges in the General Plan. The Project’s layout and design ensure that residential density is managed effectively, complying with the medium density residential requirements; Policy LU-1 (Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, well-balanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city’s scale, services, and surrounding environment) The subdivision is part of the Villages Master Plan, a series of thoughtfully planned communities. The size and design of the subdivision are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the master-planned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-2 (Promote a variety of housing types to serve the diverse needs of the community and stimulate investment) The Project builds 76 small-lot single-family

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 4 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
homes, a less common housing type within Fairfield’s traditional single-family neighborhoods. This addition contributes to greater housing diversity and supports the City's goals for a balanced and inclusive housing mix; and Policy LU-16: (Ensure that new development is designed to optimize Fairfield’s Linear Park, making the park a central feature that enhances quality of life, connectivity, and recreational opportunities for residents) The Project is located adjacent to the Fairfield Linear Park, offering residents convenient access. Housing along the southern boundary of the Project site is oriented toward the trail, with windows providing natural surveillance and "eyes on the trail." This design enhances safety, encourages passive monitoring, and promotes interaction between residents and trail users, fostering a more active and welcoming public space; (b) The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development and, with proper development techniques, may be developed into its intended use. The Parkside subdivision site has been thoroughly assessed and found ideal for residential development. The site is served by existing streets and utilities such as water, sewer, electricity, and road networks, which are sufficient to support the new development's increased demand. The pre-existing infrastructure ensures that residents will have access to all essential services. The site’s relatively flat topography requires minimal grading and thus will preserve the natural landscape. Additionally, the Projects development plan intentionally avoids impacting sensitive habitats as much as possible; (c) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the Parkside subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably harm fish, wildlife, or their habitats. The development plan has been carefully crafted to avoid sensitive habitats whenever possible. A comprehensive environmental review was conducted as part of the proposed Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (EIR), ensuring that all potential impacts have been identified and addressed. Mitigation measures have been included to protect biological and cultural resources and minimize any negative effects on the natural environment. Additionally, the site is not located near any known fish and wildlife habitats, further reducing the likelihood of harm to any wildlife;
(d) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the community water and sewer systems are available to the site. The design and improvements of the subdivision are not likely to cause any public health issues. The proposed subdivision is located within a residential neighborhood and is served by pre-existing water and sewer systems. The existing utility infrastructure will be reviewed, and the Project will incorporate both standard and special conditions of approval to ensure these systems are evaluated and upgraded as needed to handle the additional demand from the new development. By providing dependable water and sewer services, the Project ensures the public health and safety of future residents;

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 5 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
(e) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easement acquired by the public for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that there are no access easements for use by the public at large existing on the subject site. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, as there are no access easements for use by the public at large existing on the subject site;
(f) The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer serving said proposed subdivision will not result in or add to a violation of the waste discharge requirements applicable to said sewer system which were prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, in that the existing Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District treatment plant has adequate capacity. The discharge from the proposed Project will not create a condition exceeding the design capacity at the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District treatment plant. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in or contribute to a violation of the waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. The Project incorporates standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that the capacity of these systems is evaluated and upgraded as necessary to handle the increased demand from the new development.

Evaluations will confirm that the discharge from the subdivision will not exceed the design capacity of the treatment plant, ensuring continued compliance with regulatory standards and safeguarding public health and environmental quality.

Section 6. The Planning Commission adopts the following findings in support of the Development Review requests:
(a) The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and any applicable Areawide of Specific Plan. The Project will be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance following the City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment (GPA2025- 002) and Zone Change (ZC2025-002). The Project is consistent with several General Plan Policies and Objectives, such as Policy LU-1: (Maintain Fairfield as a distinct, wellbalanced, complete, and thoughtfully planned community in keeping with the city’s scale, services, and surrounding environment) The size and design of the Project are consistent with, and complementary to, adjacent residential development within the masterplanned community, maintaining the intended scale, character, and cohesiveness of the neighborhood; Policy LU-7: (Enhance and improve the built environment in Fairfield through site design that emphasizes cohesive, compact, connected, and “human-scaled” development, defined as neighborhoods, places, and streetscapes focused on the needs and experience of people) The Project enhances and improves the built environment in Fairfield through inclusive development typologies and site design that emphasizes cohesive, compact, connected, and human-scaled development. Additionally, the Project prioritizes walkability and circulation through a network of connected interior streets and aesthetically pleasing streetscapes. The uniform architectural design and smaller lot sizes

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 6 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
compliment the surrounding communities, contributing to a pedestrian-friendly neighborhood character; and Policy HS-2: (Prevent urban fires and protect the community from wildfire danger) Throughout the entitlement process, the applicant has coordinated closely with the Fire Department to receive feedback on the proposed Projects design, including making modifications to the Projects site design to address all departmental requests;
(b) The exterior design and appearance of the Project will not cause the nature of the neighborhood to economically, physically, or visually decline. The Project is located on an undeveloped lot within Village I. The development features high-quality architectural elements and materials that are aesthetically pleasing and consistent with the surrounding area. The Project includes thoughtful and environmentally friendly landscaping choices, featuring a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. These elements will enhance the visual appeal and create a harmonious blend with the existing neighborhood. The Project also incorporates standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that architectural integrity, site improvements, and lighting meet the city's design guidelines. These efforts help maintain the economic stability, physical upkeep, and visual character of the neighborhood;
(c) The Project is of high-quality design consistent with applicable design policies and standards of the City. The Project features a high-quality design consistent with the applicable design policies and standards of the City and the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines. It includes high-quality architectural elements and materials, utilizing a variety of textures, colors, and structural detailing. The development incorporates thoughtful landscaping with a mix of trees, shrubs, and ground cover, enhancing visual appeal and creating a harmonious blend with the existing neighborhood. Additionally, the Project includes standard and special conditions of approval to ensure that all site improvements, including lighting and infrastructure, meet the City's criteria for highquality development. These elements collectively ensure that the Project meets City standards and contributes positively to the surrounding neighborhood; (d) Any potentially significant negative impacts to environmental quality and natural resources have been properly mitigated. For this reason, the proposed Project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Potentially significant negative impacts to environmental quality and natural resources on the Project site have been properly mitigated. Comprehensive environmental reviews, including the Addendum to the Villages at Fairfield Environmental Impact Report (EIR) have been conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These reviews have identified all potential environmental impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures have been incorporated to address issues such as biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and greenhouse gas emissions. These measures ensure that any adverse effects are minimized to a less than significant level, preserving the integrity of the natural environment and maintaining compliance with CEQA standards. As a result, the proposed

PC Item No: H.1 PC DATE: October 08, 2025
PC File NO.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, TS2025-002, DR2025-005, ER2025-0024 PAGE 7 PROJECT: PARKSIDE
Project adheres to all regulatory requirements, safeguarding environmental quality and promoting sustainable development.

Section 7. Based upon the written findings set forth in sections 3 and 4 of this Resolution, the commission hereby recommends City Council approve:
(a) General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002);
(b) Zone Change (ZC2025-003);
(c) Environmental Review (ER2025-0024).

Section 8. Based upon the written findings set forth in sections 5 and 6 of this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby approves:
(a) Development Review Single Family (DR2025-005), and Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-003) subject to the conditions contained in the attached Exhibit A.

Section 9. The record of proceedings shall be located at the City’s Community Development Department, and the Director of Community Development shall be the custodian of such documents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8
th day of October 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS: KENNEDY/ALI-SULLIVAN/GREVE/MATTHEWS/PAUL/REESE/SINGH NOES: COMMISSIONERS: _________________________________________________ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: _________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
CHAIR
ATTEST:
___________________________

SECRETARY

PLANNING COMMISSION

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Project Name: PARKSIDE – THE VILLAGES AT FAIRFIELD
Address: North of Air Base Parkway and East of Clay Bank Road Hearing Date: October 08, 2025
File No.: GPA2025-002, ZC2025-003, ER2025-024, TS2025-002, DR2025-005 Development Review approval has been granted subject to compliance with the following conditions which must be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits, unless noted otherwise:

1.0 SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1.1 Applicant shall incorporate the following special conditions reflecting the modifications and/or needed information into their plans as part of their submittal to the Building Division of the Community Development Department:
a) Prior to recordation of the final map, the Applicant shall provide the following to the City of Fairfield’s Information Technology Department:
i) A CAD file (DWG) of the General Plan boundaries of APN 0170–010-052. The Applicant shall provide the CAD in the City’s requested coordinate system. ii) A CAD file (DWG) of the Zoning Map boundaries of APN 0170–010-052. The Applicant shall provide the CAD in the City’s requested coordinate system. iii) A Word file describing the General Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning Designations of APN 0170–010-052.
b) Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide documentation of Minor Development Review approval for any new or revised house plans (Parkside, Schematic Design, dated January 31, 2025). c) Prior to recordation of the final map, the Applicant shall demonstrate the provision of

0.23 acres of qualifying open space.

1.2 Applicant shall comply with the conditions of the Public Works Department as contained in the attached memo dated October 8, 2025. In the event that compliance with any of the referenced Conditions of Approval presents substantial challenges due to unforeseen or exceptional circumstances, the Developer may submit a formal written request on letterhead to the City of Fairfield outlining the specific issue and a proposed revision. The City will review the request and respond in writing. Approval of any revisions remains at the sole discretion of the City.;

1.3 Applicant shall comply with the conditions of the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District as contained in the attached memo dated March 13, 2025. In the event that compliance with any of the referenced Conditions of Approval presents substantial challenges due to unforeseen or exceptional circumstances, the Developer may submit a formal written request on letterhead to the City of Fairfield outlining the specific issue and a proposed revision. The City will review the

EXHIBIT A

request and respond in writing. Approval of any revisions remains at the sole discretion of the City.;

1.4 Development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans titled “Villages at Fairfield, Parkside” last revised July 3, 2025, and “Community Design Guidelines” dated September 17, 2025, except as may be modified by conditions stated herein.

2.0 APPROVAL TIME LIMITS/REVOCATION

2.1 Approval of this application shall run concurrent with the Development Agreement for The Villages at Fairfield. If building permits are not issued and diligently pursued toward completion prior to expiration of the Development Agreement, or if the approved use has not commenced prior to expiration of the Development Agreement and no permits are required, the approval shall be void.

2.2 This approval shall not be valid unless and until the following additional approval(s) are granted:
a) Planning Commission Approval of D.R. 2025-005, T.S. 2025-002; b) City Council Approval of G.P.A. 2025-002, Z.C. 2025-003, and E.R. 2025-024.

3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 The project shall proceed only in accordance with the approved tentative subdivision map plans titled “Villages at Fairfield, Parkside,” as prepared by Wood Rodgers, consisting of 9 sheets, dated "June 2025, revised July 3, 2025", architecture plans titled “Parkside - Schematic Design”,” as prepared by KTGY, consisting of 25 sheets, dated January 31, 2025, except as may be modified by the conditions contained herein and approved by the Planning Division pursuant to Section 3.2, and shall proceed in accordance with the Fairfield City Code. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval and required improvements, such as landscaping, shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City.

3.2 Approval of this project shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Fairfield City Code (Zoning, Subdivision, Building Codes, etc.), Fairfield General Plan, and applicable policy plans.

3.3 When submitting for Plan Check, the applicant must provide to the Community Development Department a copy of these Conditions of Development Review with a cover letter specifying how and where the revised plans address each of the conditions. Plan Check by the Community Development Department will not be completed without compliance with this condition.

3.4 All construction plans, including but not limited to, the site plan, building elevations, landscaping and irrigation plans, grading plan, mechanical drawings, street improvement plans, and detailed drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits shall be coordinated for consistency by the applicant prior to issuance of any permits or prior to final map approval as applicable, or commencement of the subject use, whichever comes first. Any change or modification to one particular plan shall require the corresponding revisions on other plans. All

plans shall be consistent with that approved by the Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for correcting any inconsistency which may occur through error or omission during plan preparation or construction.

3.5 The project is subject to the Solano County Public Facilities Development fee. The applicant will be required to pay such fee at the rate which is in effect at the time a building permit is issued.

3.6 The Applicant, and property owner(s), and their successors in interest, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents and employees (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any and all claims, actions, lawsuits, damages, losses and liabilities arising or resulting from the granting of this approval by the City or the exercise of the rights granted by this approval. This indemnification obligation shall include, but not be limited to, paying all fees and costs incurred by legal counsel of the City's choice in representing the Indemnitees in connection with any such claims, actions or lawsuits, any expert fees, and any award of damages, judgments, verdicts, court costs or attorneys' fees in any such claim, action or lawsuit. The City shall promptly notify Applicant and property owners of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. Applicant or property owners shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Applicant and property owners shall reimburse the City, and each of the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by it in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.

4.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT

4.1 A precise plan for all fences and retaining and screening walls shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits.

Such plan shall indicate the location, design and construction details. Fences or walls visible from public view on or off-site shall be provided with decorative treatment.

4.2 It shall be the applicant's responsibility to coordinate the location of all utility equipment with P.G. & E. Final locations of all above ground equipment must be approved by P.G. & E., the Community Development Department and Public Works Department prior to issuance of building permits.

4.3 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances on private residential properties such as air conditioning units shall be located out of public view and/or adequately screened through the use of fencing, concrete or masonry walls, decorative steel, berming, painting and/or landscaping. Said appurtenances shall be indicated on the plot plans prior to issuance of building permits.

4.4 If the project is to be phased, a phasing plan showing the sequence of site improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. Each phase shall function independently.

4.5 A block wall along shall be constructed along the eastern project site boundary. The

maintenance of the wall is subject to CFD funds.

4.6 An eight foot Public Utility Easement is to be located behind the back of the sidewalk along internal streets A,B, and C of the project site. In the event PG&E requests a 10-foot minimum Public Utility Easement, the City shall designate two feet of sidewalk closest to the residential unit to be counted in the 10 feet total.

4.7 Provide dry sack or painted tex-cote finish to concrete bases of exterior light poles.

5.0 BUILDING DESIGN
Residential Buildings

5.1 For single family and duplex projects, all corner dwellings and two-story buildings shall include architectural details (additional wood or built up stucco trim, plant-ons or other details) on the side and rear elevations facing streets and open space areas to match the detailing of the front elevation, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department.

Building Plans shall include separate sheets for these “enhanced” elevations and the site plan shall identify these units.

5.2 The veneer materials shall be wrapped around the side elevations up to either the fence lines or up to the first change in wall planes or other appropriate conclusion. The applicant shall request an inspection by the Community Development Department prior to stucco application to assure that this condition of approval has been satisfied.

5.3 All windows and doorways shall receive wood or stucco built-up trim, or other accent treatment, on all elevations.

5.4 Sectional roll-up garage doors shall be used on all house plans.

5.5 Where horizontal (e.g., “hardiplank”) siding is proposed on any single-family home, this siding shall continue through to the entire wall plane on which the siding is being affixed, unless otherwise allowed by the Community Development Department. On corner lots, all wall planes facing a street side-yard on which siding is proposed shall be completely sided with horizontal siding.

5.6 Where a fireplace or other heating system is vented to the side of any structure (i.e., no chimney or roof pipe is employed), the exterior portion of the vent and any related flashing shall be painted either a flat black color or a color that matches the surrounding wall.

5.7 Only the following woodburning appliances shall be installed in residential and commercial buildings: (1) a pellet-fueled wood heater; (2) an EPA certified wood heater; (3) a fireplace certified by EPA should EPA develop a fireplace certification program; or (4) a gas fireplace.

6.0 LANDSCAPING

6.1 The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval below as well as the Landscaping

requirements specified in the approved Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines, dated August 12, 2025. Where conflicts exist between the Landscaping Conditions of Approval and the approved Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines, the Villages at Fairfield Design Guidelines take precedent.

6.2 This project shall utilize water conservation techniques, such as drip irrigation and drought tolerant plant species, as required in accordance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

6.3 Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Such plans shall be prepared and stamped by a California licensed landscape architect or other equally educated and qualified experienced professional to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and accompanied by a statement or stamp by a California licensed landscape architect or other equally educated and qualified experienced professional that the plans meet or exceed the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

6.4 Landscape plans shall be scaled to a minimum of 1 inch = 20 feet and shall specify the following:
a) The location and size of all plant materials and shall include a plant legend specifying species type (botanical and common name), container size, and quantity of all plant materials;
b) Spacing for trees and shrubs, when a particular 'effect' (street canopy, hedges, barriers, screens...) is required shall be specified. Spacing for all groundcovers shall be specified; c) The locations of all pavements (vehicular and pedestrian), walls, fencing, buildings, roof overhangs and other structures, utility equipment (air conditioners, transformers, backflow preventers, etc.), property lines, and other pertinent site plan features.

6.5 Plant materials shall comply with the following:
a) Plant materials shall consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and groundcovers to provide design interest and as a protective measure against disease and insect infestation. Low maintenance plants are also encouraged; b) Only live groundcover is allowed in high visibility and pedestrian areas. Exceptions may be approved by the Community Development Department to include, but not be limited to, decorative gravel beds, decomposed granite paths or pedestrian spaces and areas to be covered by shrubs;
c) All landscape planting areas shall be mulched and/or covered with bark chips or other similar material, unless growth of live groundcovers would be impeded, or is necessary for weed control, as determined by the Community Development Department. Large areas of exposed soil are prohibited;
d) Drought tolerant species suitable for the Fairfield area are encouraged, as contained in the reference list prepared by the Public Works Department;

e) Plant material selections must consider the hardiness needs for the Fairfield area. Species particularly susceptible to, or potentially damaged by, disease, insects, winter freeze and other climatic conditions in Fairfield are discouraged. Species exhibiting particular problems in the Fairfield area may not be permitted and, as such, plant substitutions may be required by the Community Development Department to fulfill this condition.

6.6 Plant material size and spacing shall comply with the following:
a) Where plant materials are placed in two (2) or more rows, planting rows shall be staggered; b) Evergreen trees required for screening purposes shall not be less than six (6) feet in height at time of planting;
c) Large shrubs required for screening purposes shall not be less than twenty-four (24) inches in height at time of planting. Spacing shall be between four (4) and six (6) feet on-center, as determined by the Community Development Department;
d) Groundcovers shall be spaced such that full coverage is achieved at the end of one to two years.

6.7 Planting and staking details shall comply with the following:
a) Landscape plans shall include planting and staking details in text and/or drawing form to insure proper installation and establishment of proposed plant materials; b) Soils shall be tested to identify existing soil conditions and necessary amendments. All planting pits shall be twice the diameter of the diameter of the root container; c) All trees shall be double-staked, except that twenty-four (24) inch or larger box trees may require guy wires or triple- staking as determined by the Community Development Department. Guy wires are prohibited within pedestrian traffic areas. Protect trees from contact with any wire used in staking;
d) Provide root deflectors for all trees planted within eight (8) feet of paved surfaces. e) All planters in areas which have been compacted, such as adjacent to buildings and in parking lots, shall be de-compacted to the following depths: planters less than three (3) feet wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of twenty-four (24) inches below subgrade; planters three to ten (3 - 10) feet wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of 18 inches below subgrade; planters more than 10 feet' wide shall have compaction relieved to a minimum depth of 12 inches below subgrade; f) Planters 10 feet or less in width in locations that will not allow normal percolation of 24 to 36 hours maximum (such as adjacent to buildings) shall have drain pipes connected to the storm drain system or shall have dry wells installed as determined necessary by the Community Development Department;

g) The finished grade of planter islands or wells shall have a crown with a 2% slope down to surrounding grade or top of curb and a one (1) foot lip. Planters adjacent to buildings where a crown cannot be installed will require subdrains if adequate surface drainage will not be provided.

6.8 Stormwater treatment areas shall have an enhanced aesthetic design through the combination of appropriate shrubs/groundcover, perennial herbaceous species, and rounded aggregate such as 'river rock'.

6.9 Berms shall be illustrated according to slope, width, height above surrounding grade, and landscaping. Landscape berms shall be coordinated for consistency with the grading plan.

6.10 All landscaped areas shall be serviced by an automatic irrigation system.

6.11 All undeveloped building pads shall be fully landscaped and irrigated, or screened by perimeter shrubs to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and shall be incorporated into the required landscape and irrigation plans.

6.12 During installation of landscaping and irrigation, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Division, the landscape architect or design professional responsible for preparing the required plans, or his/her designee, shall monitor installation and visit the site prior to completion of the landscape work and, thereafter, provide a written statement confirming compliance with approved plans and approval of materials to the Community Development Department.

7.0 MAINTENANCE

7.1 All landscape areas shall be maintained in a healthy, thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.

7.2 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed in public right-of-way shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted into a Community Facilities District (CFD).

7.3 All improvements on the site shall be constructed and continuously maintained in compliance with the approved plans.

8.0 SUBDIVISIONS

8.1 The required Community Design Plan shall at a minimum include, but not be limited to, the following:
a) Conceptual landscape plan for public and private streetscapes and other rights-of-way, and common areas;
b) Fencing/wall plan which specifies height, location, design, and materials for fencing and/or walls including interface fencing for pedestrian entries to open space areas;

c) Community identification signs or other entry features; d) An open space plan which describes how each type of open space will be utilized, improved, maintained, and phased with development;
e) Architectural design theme for the project as a whole. The intent is to establish general design concepts which will be followed throughout development. The theme may include, but not be limited to: design, roof pitch, materials, colors, fireplace detailing, trims, house numbering, and detailing of front doors. Architectural design theme shall incorporate colors (i.e., earth-tones or neutral colors) and building designs which are sensitive to off-site views to the project;
f) Conceptual lighting plan including decorative street lighting and lighting of special features.

Street lights should be chosen from the approved list available from the Community Development Department;
g) Conceptual mailbox plan;
h) Accent treatment to the driveways of individual homes.

8.2 Within single family subdivisions, submit a Plot Plan for each lot at the time a request is made for building permits. The Plot Plan shall include:
a) Table with the applicable minimum zoning setback dimensions; b) Property lines;
c) Curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations;
d) Dimensioned setbacks and separation between adjacent buildings; e) Dimensioned Private Open Space;
f) Water meter location;
g) Unit model, number, and elevation type;
h) Color scheme.

8.3 Subdivisions of 10 lots or more shall have a minimum of three (3) different floor plans and three (3) different elevations.
a) Architectural details on side and rear elevations facing streets and open space areas shall be enhanced to match the detailing of the front elevation. b) The same house plan shall not be permitted for units that are adjacent and along the same street or face each other across any street.

c) For subdivisions with four different floor plans, no single model (floor plan) shall exceed 28% of the total number of units on the same street or the project as a whole. For subdivisions with three different floor plans, no single model (floor plan) shall exceed 35% of the total number of units on the same street or the project as a whole. d) Any changes to the housing mix shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department Director.

8.4 Within single family subdivisions, submit a Minor Discretionary Review application to the Planning Division for the review and approval of a Master Development Plan (MDP). MDP shall identify lot-by-lot which house plans are proposed for development. The MDP shall include the following information:
a) Overall site plan for the subdivision;
b) Proposed phasing of development, indicated which streets are active for public traffic and emergency vehicles;
c) Typical setback dimensions for each floor plan;
d) Table providing distribution percentage of product mix; e) Property lines;
f) Curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations;
g) Lot number, unit model and elevation type;
i) Each unit model shall be identified by a different color; ii) Lots requiring enhanced elevations shall be identified; h) Retaining walls;
i) Water meter locations

8.5 The draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and a copy of a typical deed shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and the City Attorney. The approved CC&R's shall be recorded concurrently with the final map and a recorded copy provided to the City. A copy of the deed for the first dwelling unit shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to granting of a final inspection.

8.6 The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department reduction(s) (8-1/2" x 11") of each page of the recorded final map at a scale of 1 inch = 800 feet within two (2) weeks of the date of recordation. No building permits shall be issued until such time as the reduction(s) have been received.

9.0 SIGNS

9.1 Signs are not part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this project shall be designed in conformance with the Sign Ordinance and established Sign Policy and shall require separate application and approval by the Community Development Department prior to installation.

9.2 A uniform sign program for this project shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The sign program shall include type, size and locations, colors, materials, lettering style, etc. for all signs.

10.0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND FEES

10.1 Capital Improvement Fee: The City has adopted a Capital Improvement Fee (AB1600) to be paid as a part of the Building Permit Fees. All new development within the City is subject to this fee upon issuance of building permits, unless exempted by grandfather provisions. Contact the City’s Finance Department at (707) 428-7496.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Conditions of Development
Date: October 8, 2025
To: Meily Sheehan, Planning Manager
From: Daria Young, Kimley-Horn & Associates – Project Consultant Elizabeth Cobb, Kimley-Horn & Associates – Project Consultant on behalf of Alvin Lei, PE, Senior Civil Engineer – City of Fairfield, 707-428-7476 Project Name: Parkside – consists of approximately 7.99 acres, which includes 76 single-family residential units, a pollinator garden, and a bench.

Project Location: East of Passion Lane, south of Gulf Drive, and north of the Fairfield Linear Park Trail (APN: 0170–010-052)
Review Requested: General Plan Amendment (GPA2025-002)
Zoning Change (ZC2025-003)
Tentative Subdivision Map (TS2025-002)
Environmental Review (ER2025-024)
Development Review (DR2025-005)
Copies To: Ryan N. Panganiban, Asst. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Michael Hether, Asst. Director of Public Works/Utilities Jason Riley, Assistant City Engineer
Garland Wong, City Traffic Engineer
Alvin Lei, Senior Civil Engineer (Development)
Christiana Lewis, Senior Management Analyst (Special Districts) Corey Beavers, Management Analyst (Solid Waste)

Helpful Phone Numbers
City of Fairfield Other Agencies
Finance Department (707) 428-7496 Army Corps of Engineers (916) 557-5250 Fire Department (707) 428-7550 California Department of Fish & Wildlife (707) 944-5500 Community Development (707) 428-7461 Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (707) 429-8930 Public Works (707) 428-7485 Federal Emergency Management Agency (415) 923-7190 Comcast Cable (800) 945-2288
SBC Communications (707) 258-5136
Pacific Gas and Electric (707) 449-5769
Regional Water Quality Control Board (510) 622-2300
Solano Irrigation District (707) 448-6847
For any questions or clarifications regarding the following conditions of development, please email [email protected] to request a meeting.

Parkside
October 08, 2025

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Site-Specific Development Conditions
General:

1. Any alteration to the final conditions of approval by the Developer shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether approval of the proposed alteration is permissible in accordance with Fairfield Municipal Code Section 25.42.6, Changes to an Approved Project.

Development Agreement:

2. Rancho Tolenas Corporation (“Developer”) is currently in the process of amending the “Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement,” (“DA”) executed between the City of Fairfield and Rancho Tolenas Corporation, et. al, recorded at Solano County as Document #201600000233, inclusive of subsequent amendments. The requirements and/or conditions found within the current DA, including those as otherwise amended by the City Council of the City of Fairfield, that pertain to this project, shall govern over these conditions of development in the event there are any conflicts found between these documents.

Traffic Study:

3. A traffic study has been prepared by Wood Rogers for the Parkside project, dated August 11, 2025. All proposed improvements shall be consistent with the findings of this study.

Please refer to the Streetssection for conditions related to street improvements required as part of this project.

The Developer shall conduct and submit a traffic impact study of key intersections, for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer, within one (1) calendar year following the issuance of half the building permits within this subdivision, being the 38th building permit, to validate the operation of the conditioned improvements. The traffic impact study shall assess traffic operations at select key intersections previously identified in the Development Agreement or VAF Village I Phase 3 Master Infrastructure Improvement Plans. The specific study intersections to be included in the analysis shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer and shall include but not be limited to trip generation, VMT, queuing analyses, and mitigation measures, if applicable. Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall validate and complete construction of all recommended intersection and roadway improvements resultant from this assessment to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Public Water Infrastructure Modifications:

4. With the first submittal of improvement plans, the Developer shall submit a fire flow model to the City of Fairfield’s Public Works Department to confirm the required flows necessary to serve the proposed development. The Developer shall pay for the City’s consultant to confirm required flows necessary to serve the proposed development

Parkside
October 08, 2025

through the City’s water model. All costs associated with the City’s water modeling shall be borne by the developer at their sole expense. The Developer shall provide a deposit to Public Works prior to City conducting water modeling. As part of the proposed development, the developer shall construct the improvements necessary to support the proposed development resulting from the updated water model at the developer’s sole cost and expense.

Tree Wells:

5. Prior to City’s execution of an improvement agreement, the Applicant shall notify the City Engineer, in writing, which of the following options Developer intends to satisfy for the intended landscaping along the Project’s frontage streets (Passion Lane and Gulf Drive). a. Option 1: A Homeowners’ Association (HOA), or similar property association, shall be established for the ownership and maintenance of tree wells along Passion Lane and Gulf Drive, as shown on the Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated July 3, 2025.

Prior to recordation of Final Map, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development and Public Works departments proof of HOA, or similar property association, formation.
b. Option 2: If the Applicant elects to not establish a HOA or similar property association for the ownership and maintenance of the tree wells, as shown on the Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated July 3, 2025, the Developer shall reduce the width of the attached sidewalk to 5.5’ to provide an additional 3.5’ of landscaped space to the front yard to meet the Project’s minimum landscape requirement and shall ensure maintenance funding is incorporated into an existing or newly created Community Facilities District. and shall ensure maintenance funding is incorporated into an existing or newly created Community Facilities District.

Domestic Water and Irrigation Services:

6. The developer shall extend existing water mains from Passion Lane to serve the proposed development.

7. The proposed development shall satisfy current state Minimum Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) requirements. All proposed dedicated landscape irrigation laterals, if any, shall be identified on the approved landscape plans. Public landscape meters, if any, shall be completed and installed, and accounts transferred to the appropriate public agency, prior to the City’s acceptance of any public landscape improvements.

Real-Time Kinematics (RTK):

8. The Developer shall provide an RTK Survey of all new City-owned utilities (water, sewer, storm drain, etc.) installed. The survey shall incorporate horizontal and vertical Global Positioning System (GPS) readings taken at the following locations: at every fifty (50) foot interval along each new utility, every horizontal and vertical bend, every utility line crossing, and every utility appurtenance (valves, manholes, inlets, etc.). Each reading shall

Parkside
October 08, 2025

include two (2) shots; one measuring top of pipe and the other measuring elevation the final grade surface elevation directly on top of the pipe. The reading output for each shot shall be in rectangular coordinates (latitude and longitude in feet) and shall be referenced to stationing along the utility.

The RTK data shall be listed in a summary table (using Microsoft Excel, Version2007) with the following column headers: pipe stationing, latitude coordinate, longitudinal coordinate, general location comment (bend, crossing, etc.). The data shall be formatted to print in a portrait view. The coordinate system shall be in accordance with NAD 83 State Plan California Zone II. The RTK Survey data summary shall be updated weekly and submitted in hard copy. An updated electronic copy shall be made available to the City Engineer at any time during the project. Final hard and electronic copies shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to City acceptance.

AutoCAD Civil 3D Files:

9. The developer’s Civil Engineer shall provide, with final subdivision package submittal, AutoCAD files containing water, storm, and sewer utility layouts as shown on the approved submittal. AutoCAD files shall be provided in a file format no later than AutoCAD Civil 3D 2016.

Street Moratorium:

10. Please note that Hideaway Lane, Friendly Valley Lane, Spur Lane, Clementine Lane, and Passion Lane are designated moratorium streets. The developer shall repair impacts, per City Standard Detail S24, Detail S24.1, and City’s standard specifications, to Hideaway Lane, Friendly Valley Lane, Spur Lane, Clementine Lane, and Passion Lane related to, including, but not limited to: utility trenching, utility connections to the public main, driveway installation, curb, gutter and sidewalk install. All costs to repair moratorium streets, along the project frontages, shall be the sole responsibility of the developer.

Stormwater Quality Improvements:

11. The developer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan (Report) prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with currently accepted design standards. Water Quality Improvement Plans (WQIP) shall be integrated with the grading plans and included as part of the grading plans. Prior to final approval of the grading plans, the grading plans shall be found in conformance with the Project-Specific WQMP.

12. A Final Project-Specific WQMP shall be submitted to the City for approval with the grading plan check application and approved by the City of Fairfield Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The WQMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Site design BMP’s,
b. Source control BMP’s,
c. Pollutant control BMP’s,