Fairfield City Council
June 9, 2026

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, June 9, 2026, 5:00 p.m.

Harry T. Price Memorial Council Chamber
1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, CA 94533 or Via Zoom

NOTICE TO PUBLIC
The City of Fairfield is committed to providing meeting facilities that are accessible to persons with disabilities and/or have language barriers. To request meeting materials in alternative formats, or to request a sign language interpreter, realtime captioning, or other accommodation, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting at (707) 428-7400.

For individuals with hearing or speaking limitations, dial 711 or (800) 735-2922 (English). For Spanish, Tagalog or other language, please dial (800) 855-3000 and provide the communication assistant with the following City telephone number: (707) 399-4010.

DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS:

Pursuant to Government Code 84308, City Council Members are disqualified and not able to participate in any agenda item involving contracts (other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), franchises, discretionary land use permits and other entitlements if the City Council Member received more than $500 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant who actively supports or opposes the City's decision on the agenda item in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda. Members of the City Council who have received, and applicants, contractors or their agents who have made, campaign contributions totaling more than $500 to a City Council Member in the 12 months prior to the date the item is on the agenda are required to disclose that fact for the official record of the subject proceedings. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution and identify the recipient City Council Member and may be made either in writing to the City Clerk before the agenda item or by verbal disclosure during consideration.

REMOTE APPEARANCE
Members of the public can observe the meeting on Roku City of Fairfield, Xfinity Channel 26, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99, and web streamed live at www.youtube.com/FFCATV . The public may join the meeting via Zoom at: https://fairfield.ca.gov/zoomcitycouncil or via phone (408) 638-0968, Webinar ID: 814 7538 5275, Passcode: 7074287400
Pages
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
Councilmember Doug Carr
Councilmember Doriss Panduro
Councilmember Manveer Sandhu
Councilmember Scott Tonnesen
Councilmember K. Patrice Williams
Vice Mayor Pam Bertani

Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy
C. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects not on the agenda but within the jurisdiction of the council may do so at this time. The council cannot discuss or take action on matters not on the agenda for this meeting, but councilmembers may briefly respond to statements made or questions raised by the public, ask for clarification from staff, refer the matter to staff, request staff to report back to the council at a subsequent meeting, or place the matter on a future agenda. To speak on an agenda item please use the "raise your hand" feature or press *9 on your phone. Speakers are limited up to three minutes per item, as determined by the mayor.

D. NEW BUSINESS
D.1 CM Outside Counsel Investigation Report on Mayor's Residency Under Quo 3 Warranto
Council Discussion and Direction Regarding the Report Submitted by Outside Legal Counsel Investigating the Mayor's Residency Status Under the Quo Warranto Process
Funding Source: $66,170; General Fund
Contact: David Gassaway, (707) 428-7400
D.2 CM Request for Reimbursement by Mayor Moy for Legal Fees Related to Quo 141 Warranto Process
Discussion and Direction on Mayor Moy's Request for Reimbursement of Her Legal Fees Related to the Quo Warranto Process
Funding Source: General Fund
Contact: David Gassaway, (707) 428-7400
E. ADJOURN
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the City of Fairfield to all or a majority of the Fairfield City Council less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at City Hall, in the 4th floor lobby, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California during normal business hours.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
I, Esther Beavers, Deputy City Clerk, do hereby certify that I have caused a true copy of the above notice and agenda to be delivered to each of the members of the Fairfield City Council, at the time and in the manner prescribed by law and that this agenda was posted at City Hall, 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California on Wednesday, May 27, 2026.

Agenda Item No: D.1
I//r
Oit
F

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 9, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT: CM Outside Counsel Investigation Report on Mayor's Residency Under Quo Warranto
Council Discussion and Direction Regarding the Report Submitted by Outside Legal Counsel Investigating the Mayor's Residency Status Under the Quo Warranto Process Funding Source: $66,170; General Fund
Contact: David Gassaway, (707) 428-7400

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
City Council voted unanimously 6-0 (with Mayor Moy absent) to release reports investigating Mayor Catherin "Cat" Moy's residency in Fairfield under the quo warranto process under California Code of Civil Procedure.
nlSri jvunN
In December 2025, the council retained outside legal counsel Gary Winuk from the Kaufman Legal Group. Mr. Winuk presented in closed session on January 20, 2026, about the quo warranto process and relevant case law. On direction from council, Mr. Winuk produced an initial report in March 2026, on information submitted to him through an encrypted and secure email address.

On March 10, 2026, the council met in Closed Session to review the report. At that meeting, the council voted 4-3 to procced with further proactive investigation by Mr. Winuk. The council set 60 days and a budget of $25,000 for additional investigation by Mr. Winuk.

On May 20, 2026, the council again met for Closed Session. However, before entering closed session, and after public comments, the council discussed releasing the reports to the public. The

council voted unanimously to release the reports and schedule a special meeting on June 9, 2026, for public discussion.

Attached are the two reports produced by Mr. Winuk, along with all exhibits.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Prior to the March 10, 2026, Closed Session meeting, the invoices for Kauffman Law Group for Mr. Winuk's time totaled $32,665. Since March 10, invoices received total $18,417.50 for total expenditure through April 2026 (last month of invoice) of $51,082.50. The council authorized a cap of $25,000 after March 10, leaving $6,582.50 to be invoiced for services rendered in May 2026.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
N/A

COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney's Office

STAFF CONTACT
David Gassaway, City Manager
(707) 428-7400
ugassawayL-i airfieId.ca.goy

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2: Memo from Outside Counsel dated March 9, 2026 Attachment 3: Investigative Report from Outside Counsel dated May 20, 2026 Attachment 4: Exhibits to Investigative Report

KAUFMAN LEGAL GROUP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

MEMORANDUM
To:

Mayor and City Councilmembers
City of Fairfield
From:

Gary S. Winuk, Outside Counsel
Kaufinan Legal Group, APC �-
Re:

Residency Status of Mayor Catherine Moy
File No.:

COF6509.001
Date:

March 9, 2026
You have requested advice regarding whether the evidence submitted to outside counsel about whether City of Fairfield ("City") Mayor Catherine Moy meets the residency requirements articulated under State law to remain eligible to continue her term as Mayor and, if not, what remedies are available to the City Council.

Procedural Background
Outside counsel was retained by the City of Fairfield in November 2025 to provide advice to the City Council and Mayor regarding the quo warranto process found in State law to potentially challenge the eligibility of Mayor Catherine Moy to continue to serve as Mayor of the City due to questions about her residency within the City limits. A closed session meeting of the City Council was scheduled and conducted on January 20, 2026, for outside counsel to provide a presentation on the residency requirements for elected officials contained in State law, and the quo warranto process for potential removal of a public official who no longer qualifies for their elected office.

At the conclusion of the closed session meeting, outside counsel was directed to gather relevant and verified information related to the residency of Mayor Moy. This information was to come from two sources. First, any member of the public, or any member of the Council, would be permitted to submit relevant and verified information to outside counsel via e-mail. To facilitate this process, a Proton e-mail account was set up by outside counsel to receive such information.

The date by which the public could send such information was February 4, 2026. To further solicit such information, an email was drafted for distribution by Councilmembers to anyone in the public with information, which included the Proton e-mail address and the February 4, 2026, deadline. No information was submitted to outside counsel's Proton e-mail address either before or after (as of the date of this memorandum) the February 4 deadline.

Mayor Moy was also required to provide any relevant and verified information regarding her residency to outside counsel by February 4, 2026. Mayor Moy provided a packet of information, detailed below, by the February 4 deadline. Mayor Moy's information was forwarded to outside counsel via overnight mail by the City staff.
777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 4050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 main 213.452.6565 fax 213.452.6575 www.kauftnanlegalgroup.com

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Outside counsel was required to provide a draft of this memorandum to Mayor Moy by February 16, 2026. Outside counsel provided the draft memorandum on that date. Mayor Moy was then required to provide any comments or responses to the draft memorandum by February 27, 2026.

Mayor Moy provided her comments on the draft memorandum by that date, On March 1, 2026, Council Member Williams sent an e-mail to City Attorney David Lim requesting that outside counsel review the candidate papers filed by Mayor Moy to run for County Supervisor in the 2026 election cycle. Mr. Lim sent this message to outside counsel the same day. This request for additional information was outside the February 4, 2026, deadline established by the City Council for the receipt of information. However, outside counsel requested Mayor Moy's permission to access these records, in order to provide a more complete factual record. Mayor Moy granted her permission to the Registrar to provide the requested information, which greatly sped up the ability for outside counsel to obtain it. Outside counsel then spoke with the Registrar, who provided the relevant information via telephone.

All relevant, verified information was included in the preparation of this memorandum.

Relevant Legal Standard to Determine Residency
The City of Fairfield is a General Law City. General Law Cities, as opposed to Charter Cities, are required to follow State statues, and may not adopt ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of State law. Therefore, State law regarding the residency requirements of City elected officials, including the Mayor and City Councilmembers, must be followed, along with any Municipal ordinances that are not in conflict with State law.

The City's Municipal Code provides that Members of the City Council shall be elected "by District" as defined in California Government Code Section 34871. It also states that the Mayor shall be elected by a city-wide election of eligible voters residing in the City of Fairfield. Further, it states that "(a) person shall not be eligible to be elected to be a Member of the City Council unless he or she is otherwise qualified as required by law, resides in the geographical area making up the district from which he or she is nominated to be elected and is a registered voter of the City of Fairfield at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate." (Municipal Code Section 2A.03.)
Government Code Section 34871 provides that "(t)he term "by districts" shall mean election of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone. "Geographical area making up the district" is defined to mean the district, and in the case of elections from districts shall mean the entire city except with respect to the residence requirements imposed by Government Code Section 34882. Section 34882 states that "(a) person is not eligible to hold office as a member of a municipal legislative body unless he or she is otherwise qualified, resides in the district and both resided in the geographical area making up the district from which he or she is elected and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate."

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Residency is also referred to in Government Code Section 36502. This Section, which identifies when a vacancy occurs in a local elected City office, provides that a person is not eligible to hold office as councilmember unless she is at the time of assuming the office an elector of the city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers were issued to the candidate.

It also states that "(i)f, during his or her term of office, he or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her office shall immediately become vacant."
The Government Code provides certain "rules" for residency, as follows:
(a) It is the place where one remains when not called elsewhere for labor or other special or temporary purpose, and to which he or she returns in seasons of repose. (b) There can only be one residence.
(c) A residence cannot be lost until another is gained. (d) The residence of the parent with whom an unmarried minor child maintains his or her place of abode is the residence of such unmarried minor child. (e) The residence of an unmarried minor who has a parent living cannot be changed by his or her own act.
(f) The residence can be changed only by the union of act and intent. (g) A married person shall have the right to retain his or her legal residence in the State of California notwithstanding the legal residence or domicile of his or her spouse. (Government Code Section 244.)
Residency is further defined for voter registration purposes under Elections Code Section 349, which states that:
"a) "Residence" for voting purposes means a person's domicile. (b) The domicile of a person is that place in which his or her habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining, and to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given time, a person may have only one domicile."
(c) The residence of a person is that place in which the person's habitation is fixed for some period of time, but wherein he or she does not have the intention of remaining. At a given time, a person may have more than one residence.
(Elections Code Section 349.)
Both sections require the union of act and intent to determine residence. California courts and the Attorney General's office have applied this basic principle when considering the residence of public officials. For example, courts have held that "[d]espite the fact that the terms residence and domicile are often used synonymously, residence is not a synonym for domicile, and its meaning in particular statutes is subject to differing construction, depending on the context and

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

purpose of the statute in which it is used. (Kirk v. Board of Regents (1969) 273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 434-435.) In Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc., 206 Cal. 515, 520, the Court ruled that "The question of residence is largely dependent upon the intent of the person whose residence is the subject of inquiry."
Similarly, in Chambers v. Hathaway, (1921) 187 Cal. 104, 105, the Court found that "Where a person has two dwellings in different places and resides a part of his time in one place and a part of the time in another alternatively, the question which of the two places is his legal residence is almost altogether a question of his intent. If a parry has two residences, that will be esteemed his domicile which he himself selects or deems to be his home, or which appears to be the center of his affairs, or where he votes or exercises the rights and duties of a citizen." In interpreting the term "residency" found in Government Code Section 244, the California State Supreme Court has ruled that the term "residence" as used in section 244 means "legal residence" or "domicile." (Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Ca1.3d 1, 7; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239; see also Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107, 1113.) The test for determining a person's domicile is physical presence coupled with an intention to make that place his or her permanent home. (Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at 116.) A domicile, once acquired, continues until it is shown that a new domicile has been acquired. (DiMiglio v. Machore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1268.) The Attorney General's office has opined on this issue as well. In 72 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 8, (1989), the Attorney General's office stated that:
"... While the question of domicile is a mixed question of law and fact, many factors enter into the equation, including where an individual is registered to vote and his or her address for mail, where tax returns are filed, where an automobile is registered, and where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. However, the critical element is that of intent. While declarations of intent are significant, they are not determinative.

The acts must be examined as well."
(Id., at p. 14.)
In short, the determination of residency is a very fact specific question. It must be undertaken with an eye towards determining the public official's intent, when matched with the factual scenario presented. Relevant factors in other cases that have either been pursued criminally or civilly, have included: voter registration; address for mail; where tax returns are filed; where an automobile is registered; where children go to school; where the public official spends their time; and where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. Again, however, this is not an exhaustive list, and other facts may help to determine intent.

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Residency Facts
As mentioned previously, the only facts that were provided to outside counsel were those provided by Mayor Moy, and those provided by the County Registrar. Thus, these are the only facts that were considered in making the outside counsel's finding. No outside research was conducted by the outside counsel, with two exceptions. First, the residency addresses provided by the Mayor was searched online to: (1) confirm that they were within the boundaries of the City of Fairfield and (2) view an online picture of the Mayor's stated current residence on Google to confirm that it was an apartment building and appeared to be currently occupied and not an abandoned property. Second, in response to Councilmember Williams' request for outside counsel to review the relevant information contained in Mayor Moy's County Supervisor candidate paperwork, outside counsel obtained the residence disclosed by Mayor Moy in those documents.

The Mayor provided outside counsel several documents and a cover letter that were related to three properties. All properties are located within the City boundaries of the City of Fairfield. In the Mayor's response to outside counsel's draft report, the only comment provided by the Mayor requested outside counsel to protect the confidentiality of her property addresses to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, the properties are referred to in this memorandum as "Property One," "Property Two," and "Property Three." Further discussion regarding the specific location of these properties can be had, at the Council's discretion, during the closed session meeting on March 10, 2026. However, the Council should exercise caution with this information, given the Brown Act's restrictions on the release of information obtained during a Council's closed session meeting.

For Property One, the Mayor states that this she and her husband owned this property and it was her residence at the time she became a candidate for Mayor. She states that this property was vacated by her and her husband in 2025. In support of this contention, the Mayor provided three utility bills (two with her name and one with Ken Moy's name) from November and December 2022 that reflect the address she provided for Property One. Property One is located within the City of Fairfield.

Property Two has been owned by the Mayor since 2001 and is described by her as an investment property. She states that she rents this property to tenants and does not and has not resided there during the relevant period of 2022 through present. However, the property has a walnut farm which she and her family maintain. She has also spent some nights there in an office space she and her husband built for her husband's business and have held family functions and parties there through the present day. The Mayor states that she does much of her business there, but it is not her residence. In support of this the Mayor provided tax documents from 2023 and 2024, including Supplemental Income and Loss statements reflecting the status of the property as not being her residence. The Mayor states that she pays insurance rates and loan rates consistent with the property being used as a commercial space. Further, the Mayor provided a copy of her 2024 Statement of Economic Interests ("SEI"), which discloses the property on Schedule B, along with the required tenant and rental income disclosures. Primary residences are not disclosable on

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

SEIs, only other properties such as investment properties located within the City's boundaries, or two miles outside the City's boundaries. No other properties were disclosed on her 2024 SEI.

Property Three is where the Mayor states that she resides and is her domicile. It is located within the City of Fairfield. Mayor Moy states that, when vacating Property One, her family had intended to purchase a condominium within the City of Fairfield. However, economic conditions were not favorable to a purchase, so she and her family moved in with a family member at Property Three. She states that many of the family's possessions are in a storage container that they rent that is currently located on Property Two. A receipt for the cost of this rental was provided by the Mayor in support of this contention.

The Mayor states that she intends to purchase another property in Fairfield as her next residence and intends to remain a resident of Fairfield. She further states that she purposely chose to stay with the family member on Property Three because that family member resides in Fairfield, which reflect her intent to remain in the City and continue to be eligible for the office of Mayor.

She also provided confirmation of her voter registration at Property Three, and a document from the City of Fairfield that indicates she receives correspondence from the City at that address and has notified the City that this is her residence. The County Registrar also confirmed that this was the address that Mayor Moy declared as her residence in her candidate paperwork for County Supervisor.

Last, the Mayor states her unequivocal intent to remain a resident of the City of Fairfield.

Outside Counsel's Determination of Residency
Outside counsel makes this determination based solely on the facts presented. While there may or may not be other relevant facts that exist, counsel can only consider the relevant and verified information presented, per the instructions of the City Council at the January 20, 2026, closed session meeting. Note that Counsel is not aware of any other relevant facts related to the topic.

Consideration of the potential removal from office of a public official is a serious topic that should be handled with care. The California Supreme Court has recognized this. In Carter v.

Com. on Qualifications etc., (1939) 14 Cal.2d 179, 182, the court held that:
"[T]he right to hold public office, either by election or appointment, is one of the valuable rights of citizenship ... The exercise of this right should not be declared prohibited or curtailed except by plain provisions of law. Ambiguities are to be resolved in favor of eligibility to office...."
Here the facts presented weigh clearly in favor of determining that Mayor Moy is a resident of the City of Fairfield and has been so continuously since her election in 2022. She has provided unrefuted evidence to support that her residence was at Property One in Fairfield from 2022 through 2025. She further provided unref ited evidence that her current residence is at Property Three, and that she has resided there from the time she left Property One through the present.

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

As noted previously, the confluence of fact and intent must be used to determine residency.

Here, the Mayor has stated her unequivocal intent to remain a resident of the City of Fairfield.

This intent is matched with all the available facts to make the determination. The Mayor is registered to vote at Property Three, has provided the City that address as her residence, and receives her City correspondence there.

Further, there is no evidence in the record to support the contention that she lives anywhere else.

Absent any evidence whatsoever that she maintains her residence outside the City of Fairfield, the only conclusion that can be drawn from the record presented is that the Mayor resides in Fairfield, has done so for many years, and permanently intends to remain as a resident of the City, where she is domiciled.

Options for City Council
Outside counsel does not believe there currently is evidence to support a finding that the Mayor is not a resident of the City of Fairfield. However, the ultimate decision of how to proceed lies with the City Council. Therefore, the City has the following options available to it:

1. Close the matter. The Council may deem the outside counsel's report and findings sufficient to resolve the issue and take no further action.

2. Direct further investigation of the issue by outside counsel or another parry to gather additional relevant information. The City has the authority to investigate the residency of one of its members and take action consistent with the factual findings.

3. Seek a quo warranto action from the Attorney General. As described at the January 20, 2026, closed session meeting, the Council has the authority to vote to request the Attorney General to give the City the ability to file a civil lawsuit to challenge Mayor Moy's residency status and eligibility for office. It is outside counsel's recommendation that further investigation be undertaken before such a submission, as it is likely to be rejected by the Attorney General's office based on the current factual record.

4. Declare a vacancy in the Mayor's elected office. Government Code Section 36502 states that, if, during her term of office, a public official moves her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, her office shall immediately become vacant. The City Council could vote to declare a vacancy and could then fill the vacant seat with a special election or appointment. There is some legal question as to whether this can be used to remove a public official where the residency issue occurs during the public official's term (rather than at the time of nomination) (See 79 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen.

21.). It is outside counsel's recommendation that further investigation be undertaken before such an action is taken, as the current factual record does not support declaring a vacancy based on the residency issue.

KAUFMAN LEGAL GROUP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

INVESTIGATIVE REPORT

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

HEART OF SOLANO COUNTY
C A L 1 f O R N 1 A
OUTSIDE COUNSEL GARY S. WINUK
May 20, 2026
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

INTRODUCTION
In a closed session meeting on March 10th, 2026, the Fairfield City Council directed Outside Counsel Gary Winuk to conduct an investigation and report back to the City Council within 60 days. The investigation was to determine the residency of Fairfield Mayor Catherine Moy from the time she took out papers from the City Clerk's office to run for Mayor in 2022 through the present. This Investigative Report covers the evidence that was gathered throughout the course of the investigation, along with applicable law and options for the Council to consider as next steps, if any are desired.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Outside counsel was retained by the City of Fairfield in November 2025 to provide advice to the City Council and Mayor regarding the quo warranto process found in State law to potentially challenge the eligibility of Mayor Catherine Moy to continue to serve as Mayor of the City due to questions about her residency within the City limits. A closed session meeting of the City Council was scheduled and conducted on January 20, 2026, for outside counsel to provide a presentation on the residency requirements for elected officials contained in State law, and the quo warranto process for potential removal of a public official who no longer qualifies for their elected office.

At the conclusion of the closed session meeting, outside counsel was directed to gather relevant and verified information related to the residency of Mayor Moy. This information was to come from two sources. First, any member of the public, or any member of the Council, would be permitted to submit relevant and verified information to outside counsel via e-mail. To facilitate this process, a Proton e-mail account was set up by outside counsel to receive such information. The date by which the public could send such information was February 4, 2026. To further solicit such information, an email was drafted for distribution by Councilmembers to anyone in the public with information, which included the Proton e-mail address and the February 4, 2026, deadline. No information was submitted to outside counsel's Proton e-mail address either before or after the February 4 deadline. No information has been sent to the Proton e-mail address as a part of this investigation either.

K
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

Mayor Moy was also required to provide any relevant and verified information regarding her residency to outside counsel by February 4, 2026. Mayor Moy provided a packet of information by the February 4 deadline. Mayor Moy's information was forwarded to outside counsel via overnight mail by the City staff.

Outside counsel provided a draft of this first memorandum to Mayor Moy by February 16, 2026. Outside counsel provided the draft memorandum on that date. Mayor Moy was then required to provide any comments or responses to the draft memorandum by February 27, 2026. Mayor Moy provided her comments on the draft memorandum by that date.

On March 1, 2026, Councilmember Williams sent an e-mail to City Attorney David Lim requesting that outside counsel review the candidate papers filed by Mayor Moy to run for County Supervisor in the 2026 election cycle. Mr. Lim sent this message to outside counsel the same day. This request for additional information was outside the February 4, 2026, deadline established by the City Council for the receipt of information. However, outside counsel requested Mayor Moy's permission to access these records, in order to provide a more complete factual record.

All relevant, verified information was included in the preparation of the initial memorandum from outside counsel to the City Council. The initial memorandum is attached to this Investigative Report as Exhibit A. The finding of the initial memorandum was that there was unrefuted evidence that the Mayor resided at Property Three, based on the limited scope of the information received by outside counsel on the issue of the Mayor's residency.

On March 10, 2026, the City Council held a closed session meting to consider the initial memorandum. At that meeting the Council voted to direct outside counsel to conduct a further investigation of the Mayor's residency. The direction included consideration of the Mayor's residency from the time she acquired candidate nomination papers from the Fairfield City Clerk through the present. The City Council directed the Investigative Report to the City Council to be provided within 60 days. The Report was provided to the City Council on May 10, 2026.

SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATIVE PLAN
Outside Counsel developed an Investigative Plan in response to the March 10, 2026, direction from the City Council. The Investigative Plan is attached as Exhibit B. 3 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

The City Council authorized outside counsel to utilize an investigator to assist with gathering the evidence required for the Investigative Report. Outside counsel used a highly trained investigator to assist with the investigation. The personnel that worked to gather evidence for this report, along with their profession backgrounds, are as follows:

Gary Winuk, Outside Counsel - Gary Winuk served as the Chief of the Enforcement Division of the Fair Political Practices Commission, a Deputy District Attorney, a military prosecutor and a special advisor to the San Diego District Attorney's office's public corruption unit. In his current practice, he advises public agencies and officials on government ethics issues and serves as outside counsel for the San Bernadino County campaign ethics commission, and the City of Chula Vista's Campaign Contribution Enforcement Authority Panel.

Elizabeth Lai, Investigator- Elizabeth Lai is a retired agent from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). She served in many assignments for the FBI, including human trafficking investigations, fraud investigations and, most recently, political corruption investigations with the Public Corruption Unit of the Sacramento office.

The investigation consisted of the following:
• Gathering of relevant, verified documents and records. • Witness interviews.
• Receipt of information from Mayor Moy.
• Legal analysis to outline courses of action for the City Council as to the residency of Mayor Moy during the relevant periods.
• In -person unscheduled observation of the relevant properties. • Review of information provided to outside counsel at the a -mail address garywinuk _proton.me. Note that no information was received at the e-mail address and is, thus, not referred to in this Report.

The following specific investigation methods were used:

Review of prior materials - Continued review of documents gathered in the first phase of the investigation, in context of any relevant new information gathered in the course of the investigation.

T
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

Witness Interviews with Relevant Witnesses -Outside counsel and Investigator sought to conduct interviews, administered under penalty of perjury, with the Mayor and any other relevant witnesses.

Gather Additional Documents - Outside Counsel and Investigator sought to gather additional documents from the Mayor and any other relevant party that would assist in making the determination of the Mayor's residence(s) during the applicable time period.

Follow Up with Information Provided to Proton E-mail Account - Outside Counsel worked with the City to establish a dedicated e-mail account through the Proton e-mail service ([email protected]) to receive any information or documents from the public.

No public information was provided, however.

In Person Observation - Outside counsel and the Investigator conducted in -person observations of the relevant properties.

RESIDENCY FACTS AS DETERMINED BY THE INVESTIGATION
In the initial memorandum, the only facts that were provided to outside counsel were those provided by Mayor Moy, and those provided by the County Registrar. Thus, these were the only facts that were considered in making the initial findings and recommendations of the outside counsel. No additional research was conducted by the outside counsel for the initial memorandum, with two exceptions. First, the residency addresses provided by the Mayor was searched online to: (1) confirm that they were within the boundaries of the City of Fairfield and (2) view an online picture of the Mayor's stated current residence on Google to confirm that it was an apartment building and appeared to be currently occupied and not an abandoned property. Second, in response to Councilmember Williams' request for outside counsel to review the relevant information contained in Mayor Moy's County Supervisor candidate paperwork, outside counsel obtained the residence disclosed by Mayor Moy in those documents.

In the initial memorandum, the Mayor provided outside counsel several documents and a cover letter that were related to three properties. In the Mayor's response to outside counsel's draft initial memorandum, the only comment provided by the Mayor requested outside counsel to protect the confidentiality of her property addresses to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, the properties are referred were referred to in the initial memorandum as "Property One," "Property Two," and "Property Three." Two additional relevant properties have since been identified by the Mayor and are included as part of this 5 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

investigation, which will be referred to as "Property Four" and "Property Five." The redacted documents obtained as a part of the initial memorandum are attached to this Report as Exhibit C. This Report follows the practice of the initial memorandum by making efforts to protect confidential and other sensitive information.

Substantive additional information has been obtained through the subsequent investigation that is disclosed in this Investigative Report. As detailed below, some of the additional information obtained is inconsistent with the information obtained in the initial memorandum as provided by the Mayor.

Mayor's Residence in 2022
Regarding Property One, the Mayor states that she and her husband owned this property and it was her residence at the time she became a candidate for Mayor in 2022. This property is located within the City of Fairfield. She states that this property was vacated by her and her husband in March 2025. In support of this contention, the Mayor provided three utility bills (two with her name and one with her husband's name) from November and December 2022 that reflect the address she provided for Property One. This information was provided as part of the initial memorandum.

Also provided in the initial memorandum is the statement from the Mayor that she left her Property One home in response to her negative economic circumstances. She intended to buy another property in the City of Fairfield but was unable to qualify for a home purchase due to her low income. This required her to seek to live with friends and relatives so she could remain a resident of the City.

The investigator conducted several interviews regarding this property and the issue of the Mayor's residence there. Specifically, she conducted three recorded interviews with neighbors to Property One.' Each neighbor lived in one of three separate residences that were either adjacent to or in close proximity of Property One. These interviews were conducted under penalty of perjury. No notice was given to any of the neighbors in advance of the interviews.

Each of the three neighbors stated under the penalty of perjury that Mayor Moy and her husband lived at the property in 2022 and continued to live there through early 2025. The ' The recordings of witness interviews are in the possession of the outside counsel and are available for review. If requested, a professional transcription of the recordings can be obtained and provided to the Council.
l:

Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

witnesses also stated that they saw the Mayor and her husband frequently at the home and in the neighborhood. Two of the three witnesses recalled that the Mayor and her husband had a dog while they lived at Property One and would see them walking the dog. This is consistent with the Mayor's statement that she lived at Property One in 2022 and moved out in early 2025. Last, the Mayor provided a copy of her driver's license to outside counsel, which reflected an address at Property One.

Mayor's Residence After Leaving Property One in Early2025 In her initial statement for the initial memorandum, which was made via letter to outside counsel and not submitted under penalty of perjury,2 the Mayor stated that she moved into Property Three, an apartment located in the City of Fairfield, after she moved out of Property One. The Mayor, as part of her response to this investigation, has since provided significant additional information that was not included as part of her initial responses that is at least partially inconsistent with her initial statement.

On March 26, 2026, outside counsel e-mailed the Mayor a series of questions. (attached as Exhibit D).) The Mayor provided responses through her counsel on April 23, 2026. (attached as Exhibit E.) In her response, the Mayor stated that she lived with a friend in a home in the City of Fairfield (Property Four) from March 2025 through June 2025. She also stated that she moved into the Property Three apartment at the end of June 2025 and had a lease agreement for another property in January 2026 (Property Five) and, in fact, received the keys to Property Five on April 9, 2026. Property Five is located within the City of Fairfield. Her declaration states that she "signed a lease to live at another house in the City of Fairfield in January 2026 but did not move in until April 2026." She further states in her declaration that she "told City Manager David Gassaway that I would temporarily stay at the Suisun Valley property (Property Three) while searching for a new Fairfield home. He said "OK."" She also states that "For a few weeks, Ken and I stayed together in the office space at the Suisun Valley property. During this time, we both continued to search for properties in Fairfield for sale." She continued: "In March 2025, 1 moved in with my friend, , and her adult daughter, _, on _ Court in Fairfield. Ken stayed at the office. We have a French bulldog, and = has a dog who can't share a home with other dogs. We decided our bulldog and Ken would stay 2 See Exhibit C.
a Certain names and addresses have been redacted to protect confidential information.

VA
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

at the Suisun Valley property. It also gave us space apart to think and heal. and I lived together at the apartment, sharing in household duties, such as cooking, grocery shopping, and cleaning. I regularly conducted all of my ordinary day-to-day living activities at M's house. I had a key to the house. I spent time there when I was not at work, visiting Ken from time to time to make sure he was taken care of. Sometimes I would work remotely from the Suisun Valley office space to spend time with him. At about the end of June 2025,1 moved into my daughter's two -bedroom apartment on — _ in Fairfield. I lived in the spare bedroom; my daughter and her boyfriend were in the main bedroom. Since we're family, I didn't sign a "lease," but because I was living with them, I contributed to the household in other ways."
She continues in the declaration to state that "From June 2025 until March 2026, 1 occupied their spare bedroom — hung my clothes in the closet, kept belongings in the dresser, and generally conducted my ordinary day-to-day living activities there. I was planning on staying there as long as it took to find a new Fairfield house, and I even changed myvoter registration and official city documents to this address." Mayor Moy submitted two witness declarations in support of these contentions. The first was from the person with whom she states she resided with at Property Four from March 2025 through June 2025. Second is a declaration from the person from whom the Mayor states she is renting Property Five. These statements are attached as Exhibit F. One of the declaration submitted states that the owners of Property Five gave the keys to the Mayor on April 9 and that, as of April 22, 2026, the Property Five owners had moved into their new house. The declaration further stated they were "happy to be in our new home, but some of our things still remain at = Drive."
Mayor Moy made no mention of Property Four or Property Five, or the existence of the January 2026 Property Five lease, in her initial statement to outside counsel before the March 10, 2026, City Council closed session meeting. Nor did she disclose that she lived at Property Four for a period of time in 2025 during the initial review period. Thus, the outside counsel's initial memorandum did not reflect this information and the Council did not have this information at the March 10, 2026, closed session meeting.

Mayor Moy first provided outside counsel with information about Properties Four and Five on April 23, 2026, nearly one week after the planned deadline for receipt of investigative information. Mayor Moy had been notified by outside counsel of this requested deadline. l:3
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Outside counsel accepted the information from Mayor Moy despite its late submission in order to ensure the Mayor had a full opportunity to participate in the investigation.

However, this accommodation caused significant delays in the preparation of the Investigative Report and, given the significant new information provided, required further investigation before the Report could be prepared. The results of the further investigation are detailed below.

Investigative Efforts Regarding Property Three and Property Two Before receipt of the additional information regarding Property Four and Property Five, outside counsel and the Investigator made additional investigative efforts beyond just the requests for information and cooperation from the Mayor. Specifically, outside counsel and the investigator conducted in -person observations of the property and interviews with witnesses at Property Two and at the Property Three apartment.

Outside counsel and the investigator made an initial request for information to the Mayor on March 26, 2026. Again, this request made before obtaining knowledge of Property Four or Property Five. Outside counsel requested the following information:
• An Interview with the Mayor and, separately, with her husband, conducted in person with outside counsel and the investigator under penalty of perjury. • Interviews with the other residents of the Property Three apartment. • A site visit at the Property Three Apartment.
• A list of the names of all individuals who reside at Property Three (the apartment). • A list of the Mayor's, the Mayor's spouse's and anyone else residing at Property Three's vehicles including make, model, color, license plate number and model year and how long each person has owned the vehicle(s). • A list of any witnesses who live at Property Three that should be contacted to verify that the Mayor resides there.

The Mayor declined to participate in an in -person interview and did not arrange interviews with other residents at Property Three. She did not permit a site visit at Property Three and did not provide any information regarding her vehicles. Last, she did not identify any witnesses at Property Three for outside counsel and the investigator to contact.

The Investigator interviewed the on -site property manager at the Property Three apartment on April 1, 2026. The property manager provided a sworn, recorded interview. In the sr'
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

interview, the property manager stated that she had worked and lived on Property Three for many years. She knew all of the tenants in the Apartment in which the Mayor stated she lived. She did not know Mayor Moy and said she had never seen her on the property. She said the apartment was a two -bedroom apartment in which three people live. A woman (not the Mayor), her son and the Mayor's daughter.' She stated that she had been trying to contact the residents to have them sign a new lease, which would disclose current occupants and their vehicles. She said that the tenants had not come to the apartment office to see her to sign the lease and eventually stated, via text message, that they would be vacating the apartment in June 2026. The investigator viewed text messages between the witness and the tenants that confirmed this statement.

The witness further stated that the Mayor was not listed on the lease and had never paid the rent for the apartment. She showed the lease to the Investigator, who confirmed that the Mayor's name was not on the lease. A copy of the lease is attached as Exhibit H. She further stated that, to park at the apartment complex, residents needed to register their vehicles and park in assigned spots. She stated that the vehicles registered for the relevant apartment were a Blue Nissan Rogue and a Blue Nissan Versa. The relevant license plate numbers were provided to the Investigator, along with the name of the person to whom the car belonged. The assigned spots for the apartment complex were observed by the investigator and outside counsel. One spot contained a blue Nissan. The other contained another vehicle that was not the Mayor's vehicle. The Mayor's vehicle is a tan Chevy Suburban.

Neither of the cars registered with the apartment were listed as belonging to the Mayor but rather were listed as belonging to two of the listed tenants. The witness also stated that dogs were not permitted at the apartments, unless the dogs were service dogs.

Also on April 1, 2026, outside counsel and the investigator conducted an in -person observation of Property Three and Property Two. Specifically, outside counsel and the investigator observed all people and cars coming from and arriving from the Property Three apartment from 7:30 a.m. through 9:00 a.m. The Mayor was not observed coming to or Leaving the property, nor washer vehicle observed in the parking lot. 'The on -site manager identified the names of the tenants, but their names, and the name of the on -site manager are not specifically listed in the report to protect confidentiality. 10 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Outside counsel and the investigator then went on the same day at 9:00 a.m. to observe Property Two in Suisun Valley. Outside counsel and the investigator drove onto a road adjacent to the property. The Mayor immediately came out of the "office" building on the property, which had the appearance of a small dwelling unit. Outside counsel and the investigator greeted the Mayor verbally. The Mayor instructed outside counsel and the investigator that they were on private property and needed to leave immediately. She further stated that she had retained counsel and that any communications should be made through her counsel. This was the first time the Mayor had notified outside counsel that she was represented by counsel, and all future communicators were conducted through the Mayor's counsel.

The Mayor appeared to have come out of the "office" building before approaching the outside counsel's vehicle. She stated to outside counsel and the investigator; "I'm here, as I'm here every morning." The Mayor, in her unsworn statement for the initial memorandum, had stated that she worked in the office at Property Two everyday. However, she was not observed leaving her stated residence at the Property Three apartment from 6:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. that day to drive to the Suisun Valley property. Once outside counsel and the investigator left Property Two, the Mayor entered her vehicle, a tan Chevrolet Suburban, and drove off the property as well. This interaction was documented by the investigator via an investigative report. (See Exhibit G).

Outside counsel and the investigator conducted a second day of unannounced, in -person observation on April 10, 2026. At approximately 6:30 a.m. the Mayor's vehicle was observed parked by the "office" building on Property Two, under an outdoor carport.

Outside counsel and the investigator then observed the Property Three apartment until 9:00 am, and the Mayor did not come to the apartment complex. This was documented by the investigator in a report with photos. (See Exhibit 1).

Property Two has been owned by the Mayor since 2001 and is described by her as an investment property. She states that she rents this property to tenants and claimed in her statement for the initial memorandum that she does not and has not resided there during the relevant period of 2022 through present. She initially stated that she has also spent some nights there in an office space she and her husband built for her husband's business and have held family functions and parties there through the present day.

The Mayor initially stated that she does much of her business there, but it is not her residence. In support of this the Mayor for the initial memorandum provided tax documents 11 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

from 2023 and 2024, including Supplemental Income and Loss statements she contends reflect the status of the property as not being her residence. The Mayor stated that she pays insurance rates and loan rates consistent with the property being used as a commercial space. Further, the Mayor initially provided a copy of her 2024 Statement of Economic Interests ("SEI"), which disclosed the property on Schedule B, along with the required tenant and rental income disclosures.

The Mayor did not provide any additional documents related to Property Two as part of this investigation. As noted previously, the Mayor now states that her husband resided at Property Two in Suisun Valley for a period of time. However, her statement provided on April 23, 2026, states that she resided at the Property Three apartment through April 9, 2026, when she moved into Property Five, despite her vehicle being observed at the Suisun Valley Property Two early in the morning on April 1 and April 10.

Investigative Efforts Regarding Property Five
On April 23, 2026, outside counsel was informed by the Mayor that she contends she had a signed lease for Property Five in place in January 2026 and moved into Property Five on April 9, 2026. In support of this statement, the Mayor submitted a copy of a lease between her and the property owner with the signatures redacted. On April 24, 2026, outside counsel requested the following information from the Mayor through her counsel:
• A copy of the lease for the property without signatures redacted. • A complete list of any vehicles owned by the Mayor and her husband, along with make, model, year, color and license plate number.
• A copy of proof that the utilities that the Mayor is now required to pay per the Property Five lease that are now in her name.
• A copy of the first rent check paid by the Mayor to the Property Five owner.

Specifically, the check as processed by the bank.
• Identification of any specific nights she recalls staying at Property Three since January 1, 2026.
• Whether the Mayor had notified the City of her change of address and if she has changed her voter registration information with the County. If she had changed her voter registration information, (as she did during the first stage of this inquiry) authorization to contact the County Registrar to confirm the change. 12 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

• Whether the Mayor had acquired property insurance for Property Five, per paragraph 9 of the Lease agreement.
• Whether the Mayor would permit an in -person site visit of the property by outside counsel and the investigator.

The Mayor, through her counsel, provided responses to these questions. (See Exhibit J).

Despite initially agreeing to allow an in -person site visit at Property Five, the Mayor changed her position on this and subsequently declined to allow the visit. Specifically, her counsel stated that "she' is not comfortable with the walkthrough until her move out and the transition of her animal rescue to her new home is completed, so as to avoid disturbing the animals, maintain the privacy of her husband while he recovers (he just had another surgery on Monday and is also spending time at — as the property is easier to access than his new home), and protect her own privacy as she completes their moveout with her daughters. Mayor Moy regrets that she made the walkthrough offer to you before confirming that Ms. _ was comfortable with it. To protect her personal and professional relationship with her landlord, Mayor Moy has to respect Ms. _'s wishes."
Mayor Moy also declined to provide outside counsel with an unredacted copy of the lease, stating personal privacy reasons. She further declined to provide information regarding her vehicles, stating that the request as "cumbersome" and "invasive" of her privacy and stated it could lead to safety concerns for her and her family.

The Mayor did provide a copy of a utility in her name. Her counsel stated that she only had garbage service in her name at Property Five and provide a "start of service" document from Republic Services. (Exhibit K). The document provided, however, does not have a property address listed on it. The document is dated April 21, 2026.

In response to outside counsel's request for a copy of the rent check paid by the Mayor, her counsel responded that "The landlord, , has not yet cashed the check Mayor Moy provided to her. Mayor Moy has full use of the home, but Ms. _ does not wish to cash the check until she and her husband have completely moved out their belongings. "'She" in this context is referring to the Mayor's new landlord. s This redaction refers to the Property Five address.
13 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

In response to outside counsel's request for identification of any specific nights the Mayor recalls staying at Property Three, the Mayor's counsel replied as follows:
"The Mayor cannot recall specific dates she spent at the Suisun Valley property.

Accordingly, the statement of Mayor Moy did not include the specific dates since she cannot attest to exactly what dates she stayed there. With the stress of the close of the sale of her property and moving out, she can only recall the general time frames. Moreover, the fact that Mayor Moy spent time at another property does not reflect a change in her domicile; as she has explained consistently, Fairfield has always been her home, and it is where she intends to remain. State law does not prohibit officials from owning multiple properties and visiting them; to the contrary, it expressly contemplates this possibility and specifies that this does not change a person's domicile unless intent changes too."
The Mayor's counsel also stated that Mayor Moy has notified the City of her address change and provided a screenshot of a document purporting to reflect this change. (Exhibit L).

Counsel also stated that the Mayor has changed her voter registration to the address at Property Five. However, despite outside counsel's request that the Mayor authorize the County Registrar to verify this with outside counsel, the Mayor did not provide the requested permission.

In response to the question of whether the Mayor acquired property insurance for Property Five, her counsel responded that she had and provide a copy of an insurance policy confirmation with the listed address of Property Five and a recent date on the start of the policy's coverage. A copy of this confirmation is attached s Exhibit M. The policy states its coverage is for one year.

Outside counsel and the investigator also conducted unannounced, in -person observations of Property Five. On Sunday April 26, outside counsel observed Property Five at 6:20 a.m. The Mayor's vehicle was not in the property's driveway, or on any of the surrounding surface streets. In fact, there were virtually no cars parked on the street in the immediate area of the property. Further, the driveway to Property Five was blocked by a boat and trailer, which made access to the home's garage impossible without moving the boat and trailer. Outside counsel then drove to Property Two in Suisun Valley and, at 6:30 a.m. observed the Mayor's vehicle parked in the outside carport by the "office" structure.

These observations were documented with photos, which are attached as Exhibit N. 14 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

On Tuesday April 28, 2026, outside counsel and the investigator again conducted an in - person observation of Property Five and Property Two. At 6:16 a.m. no cars, including the Mayor's vehicle, were located in the driveway or in the vicinity of Property Five. At 6:30 a.m., the Mayor's vehicle was observed parked in the outdoor carport at Property Two. A report with photos reflecting this activity is attached as Exhibit O.

MAYOR'S INTENT REGARDING RESIDENCY
The Mayor has stated unequivocally that she intends to remain a resident of the City of Fairfield. In both her initial unsworn statement and in her additional statement she has clearly and emphatically stated this intent. She has said that she intends to purchase another property in Fairfield as her next residence and has stayed at or leased properties in the City of Fairfield to maintain her residency. She has written in her declaration that she is registered to vote in the City of Fairfield (at Property Three from March 2025 through April 9, 2026, and at Property Five from April 9, 2026, though present). She also contends she notified the City staff of her address at Property Three and of her new address at Property Five.

The Mayor contends that she has provided the necessary information to demonstrate this intent. She stated that responding to the additional requests from outside counsel, in general, would be burdensome, an invasion of her and her family's privacy, and may create safety risks for her family.

As detailed below, intent is a key element in determining residency. However, intent must be coupled with actions to fully assess the issue.

MAYOR'S COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO DRAFT INVESTIGATIVE REPORT The Draft Investigative Report was provided to the Mayor and all Councilmembers on Sunday, May 10, 2026. Because the Mayor did not respond to outside counsel's questions until after the requested deadline and in order to provide the Report as close to the 60 days directed by the Council, a deadline for comments was set for close of business on May 12, 2026. The Mayor, through her counsel, provide comments on the draft Investigative Report.

The comments on the factual issues raised in the Draft Investigative Report are below, along with the responses of outside counsel.

Comment 1: "The report omits key facts that explain why the Mayor has been staying with family and friends in Fairfield in the first place. California's housing crisis is a seemingly 15 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

intractable public policy problem and Fairfield, like much of the greater Bay Area, has been seriously impacted. Because housing stock is limited, home prices and rents have been surging notwithstanding efforts to accelerate development of affordable housing. This is particularly true in Fairfield, which has historically been a more affordable community in the greater Bay Area and has therefore attracted commuters and others priced out of the more expensive Bay Area cities. At the same time, 30-year home mortgage rates were approximately 6% in 2025 and have remained above 6%. Not even the Mayor was immune from this reality. Yet, nowhere does the draft report acknowledge that in 2024, the Mayor and her husband began to experience chronic financial strain or that her main compensation is her $700 biweekly payment she receives from serving as Mayor. The draft report makes no reference to the fact that her husband cannot work due to a disability and that financial strain forced them to sell the Fairfield home where they raised their daughter.

The draft report does not acknowledge the fact that during the weeks after the sale of the Potrero house concluded, the Mayor and Ken searched for a new Fairfield residence to buy, constantly looked at online property sale websites, and contacted a realtor." Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel included the initial memorandum to the Council and the Mayor's Declaration as attachments to the Investigative Report, which both provide this information. However, based on the Mayor's counsel's request, this information was added into the Residency Facts and Summary of Key Evidence sections of this Report.

Comment 2: "Mayor Moy can address every piece of "evidence" the report relies on to undermine her and vociferously denies all "evidence" against her. She has consistently offered to answer any questions and provide clarification as necessary. What Mayor Moy cannot do, however, is compel other individuals — particularly her family members, friends, acquaintances, or associates — to be subjected to this investigation." Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel requested an in -person, sworn interview with the Mayor, which was not granted. Outside counsel provided written questions to the Mayor on two occasions, but the responses provided by the Mayor did not address many of the questions posed. The Mayor never responded to outside counsel's request to arrange witness interviews with those with whom she claimed to live. This request was made to the Mayor directly due to her continued stated concerns about privacy and perceived harassment of her and her family and friends.
16 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Comment 3: "During past conversations with Mr. Winuk on February 4, 2026, and the Council on March 10, Mayor Moy disclosed the fact of the = Drive lease. It is inaccurate to say that this information was withheld until the late stages of this investigation." Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel denies that the Mayor disclosed the Property Five lease to him on February 4, 2026. Further, outside counsel does not recall the Mayor referencing the Property Five lease during the March 10, 2026, City Council meeting, but welcomes further input from City Councilmembers on this issue. It is undisputed that the Mayor did not reference the lease or Property Five (or Property Four) in her initial written statement that was provided to outside counsel.

Comment 4: "Mayor Moy already changed her voter registration to this address, and you may confirm that with the Registrar of Voters."
Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel requested, in writing, that the Mayor send an e-mail to the County Registrar to allow him to confirm this information. Such permission is required by the County Registrar to release it. The Mayor provided this e-mail during the initial memorandum process but did not send a similar e-mail in response to outside counsel's request to confirm the current information.

Comment 5: "the draft report asserts that Mayor Moy contends she already participated in a formal interview with Mr. Winuk. Draft Report at 22. Not so. Mayor Moy spoke with Mr.

Winuk in early 2026. During that conversation, she provided information to him, and he asked questions and she answered them, but there is no dispute that this conversation with Mr. Winuk was not an interview under oath."
Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel denies that the Mayor provided any information regarding her residency in any oral conversation at any time. The Mayor specifically refused to submit to an in -person interview with outside counsel. Outside counsel's conversation with the Mayor in early 2026 consisted of responding to a question about the use of campaign funds for legal services and about making referrals for the Mayor to seek her own counsel. Outside counsel provided the Mayor, via e-mail, with referrals for her to seek her own counsel in response to this request.

Comment 6: "You state that you and Ms. Lai conducted unannounced observations at Property Three on April 1 and April 10, 2026, incorrectly implying that the Mayor was living there at that time. See Draft Report at 12. As Mayor Moy has already explained, however, 17 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

she was not living there consistently at that time. Instead, she had to split time between Property Three and Property Two while her move -in to Property Five was delayed." Outside Counsel's Response: The Declaration from the property owner of Property Five states that the Mayor was given the keys to the property on April 9, 2026, and began moving in that day. (See Exhibit F for full statement.) The property owner's declaration further states that, as of April 22, 2026, at the latest, the property owner moved to a different property. The Mayor declined to provide information about where she stayed during this period when asked via written questions by outside counsel.

Comment 7: "To suggest that the Mayor was present at Property Two, you rely on the presence of a tan Chevy Suburban at that site. You improperly assume that the Mayor drives only that car. See Draft Report at 10. But the Mayor drives various vehicles from time to time, some of which are not registered in her name. These vehicles include: a Saturn, Ford truck, Chevrolet truck, a Subaru, and her sister's Cadillac SUV. The tan 25-year old Chevy Suburban requires significant maintenance; it has broken down recently and has been regularly parked at Property Two. One of the vehicles registered at Property Three belongs to her daughter and was driven by the Mayor when she lived there. We understand Ms. Lai received the identifying information regarding this vehicle when she interviewed the property manager at Property Three. The Mayor also regularly drives her sister's car, a Cadillac SUV."
Outside Counsel's Response: Outside counsel and the investigator observed the Mayor driving the tan Suburban when observing Property Two on April 1, 2026. Therefore, the vehicle was functional at least on that day. Further, the Mayor twice declined to provide a List of the vehicles she and others used when asked in writing by outside counsel. Further, the Mayor's comment does not provide any specificity as to which vehicle she was driving on the dates of the in -person observations.

Comment 8: "The report states that Property Three's property manager says she never saw the Mayor there. Draft Report at 9-10. The Mayor strenuously disputes the accuracy of that statement. The property manager made the comment before she had been sworn in because the investigator forgot to do so until the very end. The fact that the property manager suggested the lease needed to be updated to list out each tenant in the apartment undermines the statement that the property manager actually knew who lived in the apartment, which could house up to 5 individuals."
iiRl
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Outside Counsel's Response: A statement may be sworn either at the beginning or the end of an interview- in either case the witness is still stating under penalty of perjury that the information provided is accurate. The Mayor's declaration, by contrast, is not sworn under penalty of perjury. Further, it is inaccurate to state that the property owner said that the lease needed to be updated because she felt there were additional residents.

Comment 9: "The report mentions the investigator was unable to see cars parked at = Drive. Draft Report at 14. As the Mayor explained in her statement and as her landlord - _ confirmed, Mr. _ has been recovering in the = Drive property following additional medical procedures, and therefore the Pedriolis' moveout has been substantially delayed. The Mayor has keys to the home but is still moving her belongings in, as the Pedriolis are still moving out."
Outside Counsel's Response: The Property Five owner's declaration, as submitted by the Mayor, states that as of April 22, 2026, the Property Five owners had moved into their new house. They stated they are "happy to be in our new home, but some of our things still remain at = Drive." The in -person observations by outside counsel and the investigator occurred on April 26, 2026, and April 28, 2026.

RELEVANT LEGAL STANDARD TO DETERMINE RESIDENCY
The City of Fairfield is a General Law City. General Law Cities, as opposed to Charter Cities, are required to follow State statues, and may not adopt ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of State law. Therefore, State law regarding the residency requirements of City elected officials, including the Mayor and City Councilmembers, must be followed, along with any Municipal ordinances that are not in conflict with State law.

The City's Municipal Code provides that Members of the City Council shall be elected "by District" as defined in California Government Code Section 34871. It also states that the Mayor shall be elected by a city-wide election of eligible voters residing in the City of Fairfield. Further, it states that "(a) person shall not be eligible to be elected to be a Member of the City Council unless he or she is otherwise qualified as required by law, resides in the geographical area making up the district from which he or she is nominated to be elected and is a registered voter of the City of Fairfield at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate." (Municipal Code Section 2A.03.) 19 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

Government Code Section 34871 provides that "(t)he term "by districts" shall mean election of members of the legislative body byvoters of the district alone. "Geographical area making up the district" is defined to mean the district, and in the case of elections from districts shall mean the entire city except with respect to the residence requirements imposed by Government Code Section 34882. Section 34882 states that "(a) person is not eligible to hold office as a member of a municipal legislative body unless he or she is otherwise qualified, resides in the district and both resided in the geographical area making up the district from which he or she is elected and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate."
Residency is also referred to in Government Code Section 36502. This Section, which identifies when a vacancy occurs in a local elected City office, provides that a person is not eligible to hold office as councilmember unless she is at the time of assuming the office an elector of the city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers were issued to the candidate. It also states that "(i)f, during his or her term of office, he or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her office shall immediately become vacant." The Government Code provides certain "rules" for residency, as follows:
(a) It is the place where one remains when not called elsewhere for labor or other special or temporary purpose, and to which he or she returns in seasons of repose. (b) There can only be one residence.
(c) A residence cannot be lost until another is gained. (d) The residence of the parent with whom an unmarried minor child maintains his or her place of abode is the residence of such unmarried minor child. (e) The residence of an unmarried minor who has a parent living cannot be changed by his or her own act.
(f) The residence can be changed only by the union of act and intent. (g) A married person shall have the right to retain his or her legal residence in the State of California notwithstanding the legal residence or domicile of his or her spouse.
(Government Code Section 244.)
K11
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Residency is further defined for voter registration purposes under Elections Code Section 349, which states that:
"a) "Residence" for voting purposes means a person's domicile. (b) The domicile of a person is that place in which his or her habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining, and to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given time, a person may have only one domicile."
(c) The residence of a person is that place in which the person's habitation is fixed for some period of time, but wherein he or she does not have the intention of remaining. At a given time, a person may have more than one residence. (Elections Code Section 349.)
Both sections require the union of act and intent to determine residence. California courts and the Attorney General's office have applied this basic principle when considering the residence of public officials. For example, courts have held that "[d]espite the fact that the terms residence and domicile are often used synonymously, residence is not a synonym for domicile, and its meaning in particular statutes is subject to differing construction, depending on the context and purpose of the statute in which it is used. (Kirk v. Board of Regents (1969) 273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 434-435.) In Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc., 206 Cal. 515, 520, the Court ruled that "The question of residence is largely dependent upon the intent of the person whose residence is the subject of inquiry." Similarly, in Chambers v. Hathaway, (1921) 187 Cal. 104, 105, the Court found that "Where a person has two dwellings in different places and resides a part of his time in one place and a part of the time in another alternatively, the question which of the two places is his legal residence is almost altogether a question of his intent. If a party has two residences, that will be esteemed his domicile which he himself selects or deems to be his home, or which appears to be the center of his affairs, or where he votes or exercises the rights and duties of a citizen:'
In interpreting the term "residency" found in Government Code Section 244, the California State Supreme Court has ruled that the term "residence" as used in section 244 means "Legal residence" or "domicile:' (Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1, 7; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239; see also Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 21 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

1107, 1113.) The test for determining a person's domicile is physical presence coupled with an intention to make that place his or her permanent home. (Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at 116.) A domicile, once acquired, continues until it is shown that a new domicile has been acquired. (DiMiglio v. Machore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1268.) The Attorney General's office has opined on this issue as well. In 72 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 8, (1989), the Attorney General's office stated that:
"... While the question of domicile is a mixed question of law and fact, many factors enter into the equation, including where an individual is registered to vote and his or her address for mail, where tax returns are filed, where an automobile is registered, and where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. However, the critical element is that of intent. While declarations of intent are significant, they are not determinative. The acts must be examined as well:"
(Id., at p. 14.)
In 2018, the Attorney General denied a quo warranto action against a Costa Mesa City Councilmember. 101 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 42 (2018). There the Councilmember had moved out of Costa Mesa to his in-laws' home in Newport Beach for a few months. The Councilmember stated he never intended to give up his domicile in Costa Mesa. He actively looked for new rental housing in Costa Mesa and ultimately leased a Costa Mesa apartment. The Attorney General concluded that "temporarily staying with relatives for a few months while making efforts to secure permanent housing" was not sufficient to have changed the official's domicile. Id. The Attorney General also explained there was "no evidence he intended to remain in Newport Beach any longer than it took to acquire a new Costa Mesa domicile." Id.

In 1989, the Attorney General denied a quo warranto application submitted against a Lancaster City Councilmember. 72 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 63, 63 (1989). In that case, the official moved his family and his furniture in February 1988 to a home he purchased outside of the jurisdiction in Palmdale. The next month, he rented an apartment in Lancaster and publicly stated that he intended to maintain "dual residences." The official was a sales representative for the Palmdale development; he purchased the Palmdale house solely as an investment and moved there to be present while improvements were being made. He moved a portion of his possessions into the Lancaster apartment, which he shared with his daughter, before moving temporarily to the Palmdale house. His "voting 22 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

residency" remained in Lancaster during this period, though his car registration and his wife's voter registration were briefly switched to the Palmdale house. Id. at 64, 71. Finally, in December 1988, while the Attorney General was considering the quo warranto request, the official stated he had sold the Palmdale house and moved into a newly purchased Lancaster home, ending his dual residency. The Attorney General concluded that these facts amounted to "very strong direct evidence" of his intent to keep his domicile in Lancaster. Id. at 71. The Attorney General also stated suing the official would not be in the public interest, and the the official's sale of the Palmdale property and his "complete return" to Lancaster made a successful civil prosecution "extremely doubtful," as it effectively rendered the issue moot. Id.

In short, the determination of residency is a very fact specific question. It must be undertaken with an eye towards determining the public official's intent, when matched with the factual scenario presented. Relevant factors in other cases that have either been pursued criminally or civilly, have included: voter registration; address for mail; where tax returns are filed; where an automobile is registered; where children go to school; where the public official spends their time; whether a residency outside the jurisdiction in temporary and where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. Again, however, this is not an exhaustive list, and other facts may help to determine intent.

SUMMARY OF KEY EVIDENCE FOR CONSIDERATION
The Council should make a full assessment of the evidence in making its determination.

The following summary of key evidence points is provided as a tool for the Council as an overview of the evidence gathered for this Report.

Mayor's Intent
• The Mayor has clearly stated her intent to remain a resident of the City of Fairfield on numerous occasions.
• The Mayor has stated that she is a lifelong resident of the City of Fairfield and her intent to continue as a lifelong resident of the City.
• The Mayor left her Property One home in response to her negative economic circumstances. She intended to buy another property in the City of Fairfield but was unable to qualify for a home purchase due to her low income. This required her to seek to live with friends and relatives so she could remain a resident of the City. 23 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

Residence at Property One
• The Mayor has stated she lived at Property One when she ran for the office of Mayor in 2022 and resided at that residence through March 2025. • The Mayor provided sworn witness statements in support of her position that she resided at Property One through the relevant period, and this evidence was corroborated by the independent witnesses interviewed under penalty of perjury by the investigator.
• The Mayor provided a copy of her driver's license, which reflected an address at Property One.

Residence at Property Four (Houseguest with Friend)
• The Mayor provided a declaration that she lived at Property Four from March 2025 through June 2025.
• The Mayor provided a declaration from a corroborating witness that she lived at Property Four from March 2025 through June 2025.
• The Mayor did not disclose that she resided at Property Four during the initial memorandum process but only disclosed it near the end of this investigation.

Residence at Property Three (Apartment with Daughter)
• The Mayor provided a declaration that she stayed in a guest bedroom at the apartment from June 2025 through April 9, 2025.
• The Mayor was registered to vote at Property Three and allowed outside counsel to verify that fact with the County Registrar.
• The Mayor notified the City that she was residing at Property Three and received City mail there.
• The Mayor listed Property Two as a business property on her Form 700 and on her taxes, which would be accurate if she resided at Property Three and used Property Two for business purposes.
• The Mayor would not permit a site visit by outside counsel and investigator at the apartment.
• The Mayor stated that only she, her daughter and son-in-law resided at the apartment. This was contradicted by the on -site apartment manager, who stated that the male resident's mother lived in one of the bedrooms and the other two tenants lived in the other bedroom.

Pz!
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

• The Mayor's statement of residency at the apartment was contradicted by the apartment manager, who stated that she had never seen the Mayor there, was never notified the Mayor was staying there, and did not have the Mayor's vehicle registered there.
• The on -site manager stated that she could not get the tenants to sign a new lease, where they would have had to disclose all occupants and their vehicles. • In person, unannounced early -morning observations of the property on two occasions by the outside counsel and investigator found the Mayor's vehicle on the site of Property Two (Suisun Valley) both times and, on the first occasion found the Mayor herself present at Property Two.
• The Mayor told outside counsel and the investigator not to enter the property again during the first visit.
• The Mayor did not arrange interviews with corroborating witnesses or other tenants. • The Mayor did not provide outside counsel with dates she had not stayed at the apartment.
• The Mayor did not provide outside counsel with the requested information regarding her vehicles.

Residence at Property Five
• The Mayor provided a copy of a lease for rental of the property, albeit without unredacted signatures as requested by outside counsel.
• The Mayor provided a copy of the property insurance she purchased for the property. • The Mayor provided a copy of a request for commencement of garbage service at Property Five, although the request did not list a specific address, but was consistent with the time the Mayor stated she moved into the property. • The Mayor provided a declaration that stated that Property Five is her residence as of April 9, 2026.
• The Mayor did not mention the January 2026 lease she signed in her initial statement to outside counsel. The lease was only mentioned on April 23, 2026, weeks after the investigation had begun.
• In -person unannounced early morning observation of the property on two occasions found the Mayor's vehicle parked at Property Two, not Property Five. • The Mayor initially agreed to, then declined an in -person site visit, expressing privacy concerns and being considerate of her landlord.

P499
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

• The Mayor did not provide a copy of a processed rent check, instead stating that the landlord was holding it until the landlord completely moved out of the house.

Other Evidence
• The Mayor stated in her declaration that she participated in an interview with outside counsel. This is inaccurate as she has only submitted written information to outside counsel despite outside counsel's request for an in -person, recorded interview conducted under penalty of perjury.
• The Mayor has expressed that she is suffering from financial difficulties which prevented her from purchasing or leasing a new home in Fairfield, until her contention she was able to enter into a lease to rent her friend's property at Property Five.

OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL
The City Council must consider the evidence gathered and presented in the Investigative Report and determine if there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the Mayor is or is not a resident of the City of Fairfield under the applicable law. The investigation revealed evidence that is subject to interpretation and must be weighed by the decision -making body, the City Council. The ultimate decision of how to proceed lies with the City Council.

Therefore, the City has the following options available to it:

1. Close the matter. The Council may deem the outside counsel's Investigative Report sufficient to resolve the issue and take no further action.

2. Direct further investigation of the issue by outside counselor another party to gather additional relevant information. The City has the authority to investigate the residency of one of its members and take action consistent with the factual findings.

3. Seek a quo warranto action from the Attorney General. As described at the January 20, 2026, closed session meeting, the Council has the authority to vote to request the Attorney General give the City the ability to file a civil lawsuit to challenge Mayor Moy's residency status and eligibility for office. The Council must determine if the evidence gathered is sufficient to seek the Attorney General's review of a potential quo warranto claim.
26 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials — Do Not Disseminate

4. Declare a vacancy in the Mayor's elected office. Government Code Section 36502 states that, if, during her term of office, a public official moves her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, her office shall immediately become vacant. The City Council could vote to declare a vacancy and could then fill the vacant seat with a special election or appointment. There is some legal question as to whether this can be used to remove a public official where the residency issue occurs during the public official's term (rather than at the time of nomination) (See 79 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 21.). The question is whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of vacancy in the office of the Mayor. If the Council pursues this action, it may consider holding a public hearing on the issue.

However, the issue could be discussed and decided in a closed session.

GUIDANCE FOR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE
Consideration of the potential removal from office of a public official is a serious topic that should be handled with care. The California Supreme Court has recognized this. In Carter v. Com. on Qualifications etc., (1939) 14 Cal.2d 179, 182, the court held that:
"[T]he right to hold public office, either by election or appointment, is one of the valuable rights of citizenship ... The exercise of this right should not be declared prohibited or curtailed except by plain provisions of law. Ambiguities are to be resolved in favor of eligibility to office...:"
Here the Council is presented with evidence gathered in the course of the investigation, which the Council must weigh, make a determination as to its meaning and decide upon a course of action. The Council, in making its determination of the evidence and its implications, may consider the guidance provided by the State's Judicial Council in its' Civil Jury Instructions. These Instructions are used in California civil trials to guide civiljurors on how to approach the evaluation of evidence. Several may be considered by the Council, as follows:

Direct and Indirect Evidence -Evidence can come in many forms. It can be testimony about what someone saw or heard or smelled. It can be an exhibit admitted into evidence.

It can be someone's opinion. Direct evidence can prove a fact by itself. For example, if a witness testifies she saw a jet plane flying across the sky, that testimony is direct evidence that a plane flew across the sky. Some evidence proves a fact indirectly. For example, a 27 Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

witness testifies that he saw only the white trail that jet planes often leave. This indirect evidence is sometimes referred to as "circumstantial evidence." In either instance, the witness's testimony is evidence that a jet plane flew across the sky. As far as the law is concerned, it makes no difference whether evidence is direct or indirect. You may choose to believe or disbelieve either kind. Whether it is direct or indirect, you should give every piece of evidence whatever weight you think it deserves. CACI No. 202.

Party Having Power to Produce Better Evidence - You may consider the ability of each party to provide evidence. If a party provided weaker evidence when it could have provided stronger evidence, you may distrust the weaker evidence. CACI No. 203.

Willful Suppression of Evidence - You may consider whether one party intentionally concealed or destroyed evidence. If you decide that a party did so, you may decide that the evidence would have been unfavorable to that party.

Failure to Explain or Deny Evidence - If a party failed to explain or deny evidence against her when she could reasonably be expected to have done so based on what she knew, you may consider her failure to explain or deny in evaluating that evidence. It is up to you to decide the meaning and importance of the failure to explain or deny evidence against the party. CACI No. 205.

CONCLUSION
Outside counsel submits this Report to the City Council for review and consideration.

Outside counsel used the limited tools available to him to conduct an investigation that required the voluntary submission of evidence and testimony from witnesses. Outside counsel did not have the power to compel production of evidence or testimony.

The evidence that was gathered, as contained in the Report, is subject to interpretation and must be weighed as to which pieces of evidence should be given more value than others.

Since the City Council ultimately must decide on a course of action, how the Council weighs the evidence is most relevant to the decision -making process.

KV
Attorney/Client Privileged Information, Exempt from Public Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act, Closed Session Materials - Do Not Disseminate

Exhibit A

A Pi OrESSiONAL CORPORATION

MEMORANDUM
To. Mayor and City Councilmembers
City of Fairfield
From: Gary S. Winuk, Outside Counsel
Kaufman Legal Groins, APC
Inc: Residency Status of Mayor Catherine Moy
Attorney -Client Privileged Doeament
File Pecs.: C0176509.001
Cate: March 9, 2026
You have requested advice regarding whether the evidence submitted to outside counsel about whether City of Fairfield ("City") Mayor Catherine Moy meets the residency requirements articulated under State law to remain eligible to continue her terns as Mayor and, if not, what remedies are available to the City Council.

Pr�raagd-ur aI 13_crchI
Outside counsel was retained by the City! of Fairfield in Nave inber 2025 to provides advice to the City Council and Mayor regarding the: quo warranto process found in State law to potentially challenge the eligibility of Mayor Catherine Moy to continue to serve as Mayor of the City due to questions about her residency within the City limits. A closed session meeting of the City Council was scheduled and conducted can January 20, 2026, for outside counsel to provide a presentation on the residency requirements for elected officials contained in State law, and. the quo warranto process for potential removal of a public official who no longer qualifies for their elected office,
At the conclusion of the closed. session meeting, outside counsel was directed to gather relevant and verified information related to the residency of Mayor Moy. This information was to come from two sources. First, Any rn=ber of the public, or any member of the Council, would be permitted to submit relevant and verified information to outside counsel via e-mail. To .facilitate this process, a Proton e-mail account was setup by outride counsel to receive such in carmation.

The date by which the public could send such information was February 4, 2026, To further solicit such information, an email was drafted for distribution by Councilmembers to anyone in the public with information, which included the Proton e-mail address and the February 4,2026, deadline, No information was submitted to outside counsel's Proton e-mail address either before or after (as of the date of this memorandum) the February 4 deadline.

Mayor Moy was also required to provide any relevant anti verified information regarding her residency to outside counsel by February 4, 2026. Mayor Moy provided a packet of information, detailed below, by the February 4 deadline. Mayor Moy's information was forwarded to outside counsel vier overnight snail by the City staff,
777 S. Figueroa StrLet, Saute 405O Us Angelvs, CA 90017 main 213 ,452,65G5 fax '212.452.G575 w�+=�v.k ��fin�Exlcgtu � ot�p.co�n

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Outside counsel was required to provide a draft of this memorandum to Mayor Moy by February 16, 2026. Outside counsel provided the draft memorandum on that date. Mayor Moy was then required to provide tiny comments or responses to the draft memorandum by February 27, 2026.

Mayor Moy provided her comments on the draft memorandum by that date, On March 1, 2026, Council Member Williams sent an e-mail to City Attorney David Fill) requesting that outside counsel review the candidate papers filed by Mayor Moy to run for County Supervisor in the 2026 election cycle. Mr, Lim sent this message to outside counsel the same day. This request for additional information was outside the February 4, 2026, deadline established by the City Council for the receipt of information. However, outside counsel requested Mayor Moy's permission to access these records, in order to provide a more complete factual record. Mayor Moy granted her permission to the Registrar to provide: the requested, information, which greatly sped up the ability for outside counsel to obtain it. Outside counsel then spoke with the Registrar, who provided,tiie relevant infornntation via telephonne.

All relevant, verified information was included in the preparation of this memorandum.

The City of Fairfield is a General Law City, General Law Cities, as opposed to Charter Cities, are required to fallow State statues, and may not adopt ordinances that tyre in conflict with the provisions of State law. Therefore, State law regarding the residency requirements of City elected officials, including the Mayor and City C:ou nc€imembeers, must be followed, along with any Municipal ordinances that are not in conflict with State law.

The City's Municipal Code provides that. Members of the City Council shall be elected "by District" as defined in California Government Code Section 34871. It also states that the Mayor shall be elected by a citywide election of eligible voters residing, inn'the City of Fairfield. Further, it states that "(a) person shall not be eligible to be elected to be a Member of the City Council unless he or she is otherwise qualified as Required by law, resides in the geographical area making up the district froin which he or she is nominated to be elected and is a registeredvoter of the City of Fairfield at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate," (Municipal Code Section 2A.03.)
Government Code Section 34871 provides that "(t)he tearrrn "by districts" shall mean election. of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone. "Geographical area inaking tip the district" is de;i'ined to mean (lie district, and in. the case or elections from districts shall mean the entire city except with respect to the residence. requirements imposed. by Government Code Section 34892, Section 34882 states that "(a) person is not eligible to hold office as a member of a municipal legislative body unless he or she is otherwise qualified, resides in the district and both resided in the geographical area making up the district fnonn which he: or she is elected and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate."

Memorandunx to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Residency is also referred to in Government Code Section 36502. This Section, which identifies when a vacancy occurs in a local elected City office, provides that a person is not eligible to hold office as councihnember unless she is at the time ofassunx AS the Office an elector Of tile city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers were issued to the candidate.

It also states that "(i)f, during his or her terns of office, he or she .moves his or her place of residence outside of the city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her office Shall immediately become vacant."
The Government Code provides certain "rules" for residency, as follows:
(a) It is the place where one remains when .not called elsewhere for lalxor or othor special or -temporary purpose, and to which. he or she returns in seasons Ofrapose• (b) There can only be one residence.
(c) A residence cannot be lost until another .is gained. (d) 'The residerxce of the parent with whom an utunarried imiixor clxild maintains his or her place of abode is the residence of such uninarded minor child. (e) The residence of an unmarried minor who has a parent living cannot be changed by his or her owl•. act.
(f The residence can be changed only by the union of act and intent. (g) A married person shall have the right to retain his or her legal residence in the State of California notwithstanding the legal residence or domicile of his or her spouse. (Government Code Section 244.)
Residency is further defmcd for voter registration purposes under Elections Code Section 349, which states that:
"a) "Residence" for voting purposes .means a person's domicile. (b) The domicile of a person is that place in which his or liar habitation is fixed, Wherein the person has the intention of remaining, acid to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given tine, a person may have only one domicile."
(c) The residence of a person is that place in which the person's Habitation is fixed for some period of time, but wherein he or site does not have the intention of remaining. At a given there, a person may have more than one residence. (Elections Code Section 349.)
Both sections require the u�xioil of act and intent to determine resiciencv. C f€�rnia courts and the Attorney General's office have applied this basic principle when considering; the residence of public officials. For example, courts have hold that'"(djespite the fact that the terms residence and domicile are often used synonymously, residence is not a synonym fbr domicile, and its Meaning in particular statutes is subject to difi'ering construction, depending on the context and

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026
Pale 4
purpose of the statute in which it is used. (Kirlr. v. Board of'Rugents (1969) 273 Cal, App. 2d 430, 434435.) In Brown v. Happy Malley Fruit Growers, Inc., 206 Cal. 515, 520, the Court ruled that "The question of residence is largely dependent upon the intent of the person. whose residence is the subject of inquiry."
Similarly, in Chainbers v. Hathaway, (1921),187 Cal. 104, 105, the Court found. that "'Where a person has two dwellings in different places and resides a part of'his tine in one place and a part of the time in another alternatively, the question which of the two places is his legal. residence is almost altogether a question of his intent. If a pasty has two residences, that will be esteemed his domicile which he himself selects or deems to be his home, or which appears to be the center of his affairs, or where he votes or exorcises the rights and duties of;a citizen." In interpreting the term "residency" found in Government Code Section 244, the California State Supreme Court has ruled that the term "residence" as used in section 244 means "legal residence" or "domicile." (Malters v I'Vood (1988) 45 ULM 1, 7; Smith v. iSadth (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239; Sec' also Fenton v. Board of Dtractor.s (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107, 1113.) `Flie test for determining a person's domicile is physical presence coupled with an intention to make that place his or her permanent home. (Penton v. Board of Dfr°ectors, sulrra,156 Cal.App.3d at 116.) A domicile, once acquired, continues until it is shown that a new domicile has been acquired. (l IMIgllo v Ma(,hore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1268.) The Attorney General's office has opined on this issue as well. In 72 Ops.Cal.Attyken. 8, (1989), the Attorney General's office stated that.-
". . I While the question of domicile is a mixed question of law and fact, many factors enter into the equation, including where an individual is registered to vote and his or her address for mail, where tax returns are filed, where an automobile is registered, and. where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. However, the critical element is that of intent. While declarations of intent are significant, they are not determinative.

The acts must be examined as weal."
(Id., at p. 14.)
In short, the determination of residency is a very fact specific question. It must be undertaken with an eye towards determining the public official's intent, when matched with the factual scenario presented. Relevant factors in other cases that have either been pursued criminally or civilly, have included: voter registration; address for mail; where tax returns are filed, where an automobile is regstered; where children go to school; where the public official spends their time; and where a homeowner's exemption or rentds credit is taken. Again, however, this is not an exhaustive list, raid other facts may help to determine intont.

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

Resldencv .tiacts
As mentioned previously, the only facts that were, provided to outside counsel were those provided by Mayor May, and those provided. by the County Registrar. Thus, these are the only facts that were considered in malting the outside counsel's finding. No outside research was conducted by the outside counsel, with two exceptions. First, the residency addresses provided by the Mayor was searched online to: (1) confirm that they were within the boundaries of the City of Fairfield and (2) view an online picture of the Mayor's stated current, residence oil Google to coni'irnl that it was an apat-tment building and appeared to be currently occupied and, not an abandoned property. Second, in response to Councilmember Williams' request for outside counsel to review the relevant information contained in Mayor Moy's Comity Supervisor candidate paperwork, outside counsel obtained the residence disclosed by Mayor lvfoy in those documotits.

The Mayor provided outside counsel several documents and a cover letter that were related to three properties. All properties are located within the City boundaries of the City of Fairfield. In the Mayor's response to outside counsel's draft report, the only comment provided. by the Mayor requested outside counsel to protect the confidentiality of her property addresses to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, the properties tire referred to in this inemoranduni as "property One," "Property Two," and "Property Three." Fuil-her discussion regarding the specific location of these properties can be had, at the Council's discretion, during the closed. session meeting on March 10, 2026. However, the Council should exercise caution with this information, given the Brown Act's restrictions on the release o'f information. obtained during a Council's closed session meeting.

For Property One, the Mayor. states that this :she and her husband owned this property and it was her residence at the time she became a candidate for Mayor. She states -that this property was vacated by her and her husband in 2025. In support of this contention, the Mayor provided three utility bills (two with her naive and one with Ken Moy's name) from November and December 2022 that reflect the address she provided For Property One. Property One is located within the City of Fairfield.

Property Two has been owned, by the Mayor since 2001 and is described by her as an investment property. She states that she rents this property to tenants And does not and has not resided there during the relevant period of 2022 through present. However, the property has a walnut farm which she and her fainily maintain. She has also spent some nights there in an office space she and her husband built for her husband's business and have held family functions and parties there through the present day. The Mayor states that she does much of her business there, but it is not her residence. In support of this the Mayor provided tar documents from 2023 and 2024, including Supplemental Income and Loss statements reflecting the status.of the property as not feint; her residence. The Mayor states that she pays insurance rates and loari rates consistent with the property being; used as a commercial space. Further, the Mayor provided a copy of her 2024 Statement of Economic Interests (``SFl"), whichdiscloses the property on Schedule B, along with the required tenant and rental income disclosures. Primary residences fire not disclosable on

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 2026

SEIs, only other properties such as investment properties located within the City's boundaries, or two miles outside the City's boundaries. No other properties were disclosed on her 2024 SI: L Property Three: is where tho Mayor states than she resides and is tier domicile. It is located within. the City of Fairfield. mayor Moy states that, when vacating Property One, her fancily had intended to purchase a condominium within the Cite of Fairfield. Howover•, economic conditions were not favorable to a purchase, so site and her family moved in with a fancily member at Property Three. She states that many of the farnily's posscssians are in a storage container that they rent that is currently located on Proper•ty'1•wo. A recelpt'for the cost of this rental was provided by the Mayor in support ofthis contention.

The Mayor states that she intends to purchase another, property in. Fairfield as her next residence and intends to remain a resident of Fairrield. She further states that she purposely chose to stay with the fancily member on Property Three because that l:amily member resides in Fairfield, which reflect her intent to remain in the City and continue to be eligible for the offee of Mayor.

She also provided confirmation of her voter registration at Property j•hree, and a document from the City of Fairfield that indicates she :receives correspondence from the City at that address and has notified the City that this is her residence. The County Registrar also confirmed that this was the address that Mayor Moy declared as her .residence in her candidate paperwork for County Supervisor.

Last, the Mayor states her unequivocal intent to retrain a resident of the City of Fairfield.

Qusici+e Cotr el's Deter nt ra 'oar a 'Reside c
Outside counsel Snakes this determination baked solely on the facts presented. While there may or may not be other relevant facts that exist, counsel can only consider the relevant and verified information presented, per the instructions of the City Council at the January 20, 2026, closed session meeting, Note that Counsel is not aware of any other relevant facts related to the topic.

Consideration of the potential removal from office of a public official is az serious topic that should be handled with care. The California. Supreme Court has recognized this. In Carter v.

Com. on Qualifications etc., (1939)14 Cal.2d 179,182, the court held that:
"[T]he right to hold public office, either by election or appointment, is one of the valuable rights ofcsb=iship ... The exercise of this right should not be declared prohibited or curtailed except by plain provisions of law. Ambiguities are to Ise resolved in favor of eligibility to office...."
Here the -acts presented weigh clearly in favor of determining that Mayor Moy is a .rm'rdent of the City of Fairfield and has been so continuously sines her election in 2022. She has provided unrefuted evidence to support that her residence was at Property one inFairfield from 2022 through 2025. ,She further provided un e;filtr d evidence that her current residence is at Property Three, and that she has resided there from the tirnne she left Property One through the present.

Memorandum to City of Fairfield
March 9, 202fi

As noted previously, the confluence of fact and intent must be used to determine residen.ey, Here, the Mayor has stated her unequivocal intent to remain a resident of the City of Fairfield.

This intent is matched with all the available facts to wake the determination. The Mayor is registered to vote at Property Three, has provided the City that address as her residence, and receives her City correspondence there.

Further, there is no evidence in the record to support the contention that she lives anywhere else Absent any evidence whatsoever that she maintains her residence outside the City of Fairfield, the only conclusion that can be drawn from the record presented is that the Mayor resides in Fairlieid, has done so for inany years, and: permanently intends to reinain as a resident. of the City, where she is domiciled.

O t orr, or• Cit Council
Outside counsel does not believe; there currently is evidence to support a finding that the Mayor is not a resident ofthe City of Fairfield. However, the ultimate decision of how to proceed lies with the City Council, Therefore, the City has the following captions available to it:

1. Close the natter. The Council may demo the outside counsel's report and findings sufficient to resolve the issue and take no further anion.

2. Direct further investigation of the issue by outside counsel or another party to ;gather additional relevant information. The City has the authority to investigate the residency of one of its members and tape action consistent with the factual findings.

3. Seek a quo warranto action from the Attorney General, As described at the January 20, 2026, closed session meeting, ilia Council Jigs the authority to vote to request the Attorney General to give the City the ability to file a civil lawsuit to challenge Mayor May's residency status and eligibility for office. It is outside counsel's recommendation that further investigation be und.ertakeen before such. a submission, as it is likely to be rejected by the Attorney General's office based on the current factual record.

4. Declare a vacancy in the Mayor's elected office, Government Code Section 36502 states that, if, during her term of office, a public official nnoves her place of residence outside of the; city limits or ceases to be an elector of the city, her office shall immediately become vacant. The City Council could vote to declare a vacancy and could then. fill the vacant seat with a special election or appointment. There is some legal question as to whether this can be used to remove a public official .inhere the residency issue occurs during the public official's tern. (rather than at the time of nomination) (Sect 79 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen,

21.). It is outside counsel's recommendation that further investigation be undertaken before such an action is taken, as the current factual record does not support declaring a vacancy biased on the residency issue.

Exhibit B

AUIFMAN LE, GAL GROUP
A PROrESSIONAL CORPORATION
Attorney/Client Privileged .trzformationn, Attoi-ney Ifork Product, Exempt f tom Public Disclosure Under the CaliforniaPublic Records Act
March 24, 202d
Investigative Plzen
City of Fairfield Investigation of 1lesidelncy of Mayor Catherine Moy Gary Winuk, Outside Counsel
biveti've
The objective of the investigation is to conduct a timely, fair and impartial investigation to determine Mayor Catherine Moy's legal residence at the time she drew candidate .nomination papers in 2022 for the position of Mayor of the City of Fairfield, and during her service as Mayor through the present day,
tnvesti tive,i'erscinneI
+Carer l llnuk, Outside Counsel — Cary Winulc served as the Chief of the Enforcement Division of the Fair Political Practices Commission, a :Deputy District Attorney, a military prosecutor and a special advisor to the San Diego District Attorney's offices public corruption unit. In his current practice, he advises public agencies aid officials oil government ethics issues and serves as outside counsel for the San Bernadino County campaign ethics commission, and. the City of Chula Vista's Campaign Contribution Enforcement Authority Panel.

Elizabeth Lai, Investigator -- Elizabeth Lai is a retired agent 1=rom the Federal Bureau of .Investigation C TBI"). She served in .malty assignments for the FBI, including human trafficking investigations, fraud investigations and, most recently, political corruption investigations with the Public Corruption Unit of the Sacramento office.
,145 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2400 L,os Angeles, CA 9007I =M 213. 452,6565 Pnx 213.=452.G575 %Yww-kautitta01eba18r0ur.c0n1

Investigative Plan
March 24, 2026

General Investigation Nlethods to Achieve Objective
The investigation will consist of the following:
• Gathering of relevant, verified documents and records. • Witness interviews.
• Interview and receipt of information from Mayor Moy.
• Legal analysis of relevant, verified information by outside counsel to make a recommendation to the City Council as to the residency of Mayor Moy during the relevant periods.
• Review of information provided to outside counsel at the e-mail address aarvwinuknproton.me.

Specific Investigation Methods to Achieve Obiective
Review prior materials - Continued review of documents gathered in the first phase of the investigation, in context of any relevant new information gathered in the course of the investigation.

I-i'itness Interviews with Mayor and Other Residents at Property Three — Outside counsel and Investigator will seek to arrange an interview, administered under penalty of perjury, with the Mayor and any other residents of Property Three.

Witness Interviews with Other Residents of the Apartment Complex Located at Property Three and Other Residents in the Neighborhoods of ftperty One and Property Two -Outside counsel and Investigator will seek to arrange witness interviews, administered under penalty of perjury, with both individuals and parties who come forward with relevant information, and those identified through the Investigator's efforts to contact nearby residents to the relevant properties.

Outside Counsel and Investigator shall conduct a preliminary assessment of the property sites to determine the appropriate range of contact to seek witness statements.

Gather Additional Documents — Outside Counsel and Investigator shall seek to gather additional documents from the City, the Mayor and any other relevant party, that would assist in making the determination of the Mayor's residence(s) during the applicable time period.

Follow Up with Information Provided to Proton E-mail Account — Outside Counsel worked with the City to establish a dedicated e-mail account through the Proton e-mail service (&-aroton.m ) to receive any information or documents from the public. Outside Counsel and the Investigator will conduct follow up interviews and requests for information from the public, where appropriate.

lnvestiaative flan
March 24, 2026

Timeline Target Pates
March 10, 2026 — Council Directs Owside Counsel to conduct further investigation of the Mayor's residency issue and provide a report back within 60 days.

April 17, 2026 — Conclusion of investigation process. Additional. information received at discretion of Outside Counsel.

April 24, 2026 -- Draft final investigative report provided to Mayor and. Council Members.

Investigative materials made available for viewing by Mayor and Council Members May 1, 2026 — Deadline for receipt of comtn.ent and additional information from Mayor and Council Members.

May 8, 2026 — Outside Counsel provides eonridential and attorticylclient privilege protected .final report of investigation to the City.

Amaliehie Law
The City of Fairfield is a General, Low City. General Law Cities, as opposed to Charter Cities, are required to follow State statues, and may not. adopt ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of State law. Therefore, State law regarding the residency requirements of City elected officials, including the Mayor and City Counoilmenabers, must be followed, along with any Municipal ordinances that are not in conflict with State law.

The City's Municipal Code provides that Members of the City Council Shall be elected "by District" os defined in California Government Code Section 34871. It also states that the Mayor shall be elected by it. city-wide election of eligible voters residing, in the City of Fairfield. Further, it states that "(a) person shall not he eligible to be elected to be a Member of the City Council unless he or she is otherwise qualified as required by law, resides in the: geographical area snaking; up the district froth which he or she is nominated to be elected and is a registered voter of the City of Fairfield at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate.'' (Municipal Code Section 2A.03.)
Government Code Section 34871 provides that "(t)he terra "by districts" shall mean election of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone, I*Cieographical aream6king; up the district" is defined to mean the district, and in the case of elections front'. distdots shall r etas the entire city except with respect to the residence requirements imposed by Government Code Section 34882.. Section 34882 states that "(a) person is not eligible to hold office as a' -member of a municipal legislative body unless he or she is otherwise qualified, resides iit the district and both resided in the geographical. area making up the district from which he or she is elected and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination papers are issued to the candidate."

Investigative Plan
Marcia 24, 2026

Residency is also referred to in Government Coda Section 36502. This Section, which identifies when a vacancy occurs in a local elected City office, provides that a person is not eligible to hold office as councilmernber unless she is at the time of assuming the office an elector of the city, and was a registered voter of the city at the time nomination. rapers were issued to the candidate.

It also states that "(i)f, during his or her terns of office, lie or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the city Rmits or ceases to be an elector of the city, his or her off -ice shall immediately become vacant."
The Government Code provides certain "rules" for residency, as follows:
(a) It is the place where one remains wheel not called elsewhere for labor or other special or temporary purpose, and to whicbhe or she returns in seasons of repose. (b) There can only be one residence.
(c) A residence cannot be lost untilanother is gained.
(d) The residence of the parent with: whom an utunarried ininor child maintains his or her place of abode is the residence of such unmarried minor child. (e) The residence of an unmarried rninor who has a parent living cannot be changed by his or her own act.
(1) The residence can be changed only by the union of act and hitent. (g) A married person shall. have the right to retain his or her legal residence in the State of California notwithstanding the legal residence or domicile of his or her spouse. (Government Code Section 244.)
Residency is further defined for voter registration purposes under Blections Cade Section 349, which states that:
"(a) "Residence" for voting, purposes means a.person's domicile. (b) The domicile of a person is that plaice in which his or her habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining, and to which, whenever lie or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given tine, a person may have only one domicile,"
(c) The residence of a person is that place in which the persoifs habitation is fixed for some period of time, but wherein he or she does not have the intention of remaining. At a given time, a person may have more than one residence.
(Elections Code Section 349.)
4

Investigative Flan
March 24, 2026

Both sections require the union of act and intent to determine residence. California courts and the Attorney General's office have applied this basic principle when considering the residence of public officials. For example, courts have held that "(d]easplte the fact that the terms residence and domicile are often used synonymously, residence is not a synonym for domicile, and its meaning in particular statutes is subject to differing. construction, depending on the context and purpose of the statute in which it is used. (Kira u Bo aml of Regants (1969) 273 Cal. Epp, 2d 430, 434-435.) In Brown it Happy Valley 1ruh Gmivet s, .Inc., 206 Cal. 515, 520, the Court ruled that "(t)he question of residence: is largely dependent upon the intent of the person. whose residence is the subject of inquiry."
Similarly, in Chambers a Holhempay, (1921)187 Cal.104, 105, the Court found that "Where a person has two dwellings in different places and resides a part of his tinge in one; place and a part of the dine in another alternatively, the question which of the two places is his legal residence is almost altogether a question of his intent. If a party has two residences, that will be esteemed his domicile which he himself selects or deems to be his home, or which appears to be the center of his affairs, or where he votes or exercises the rights and duties of a citizen." In interpreting the term "residency" found in Government Code Section 2441 the California state Supreme Court has ruled that. the term "residence" as used in section 244, means "legal residence" or "domicile." (Makers a H-leed (1988) 45 Ca1.3d 1, 7; ,:Smith a Smalh (1955) 45 06I.2d 235, 239; see also Fenton v Boaid qj'Dir�ectors (1984) 1.56 CaLApp.3d 1107, 1113.) The test for determining a person's domicile is physical presence coupled with an intention to awake that place his or her permanent home. (T* enlon ak Board of Dircctorx, supra,156 Cal..El:pp.3d nt 11G.) A domicile, once acquired, continues until it is•shown that anew domicile has been acquired. (Dibligllo it Machore (1992) 4 Cal.AppAth 1260,1268.)
The Attorney General's office has opined onthis issue as well. In 72 Ops,Cal.A.tty.GerL 8, (1989), the Attorney General's office stated that:
".. , While the question of domicile is a niixed.question of law and fact, many factors enter into the equation, including where an individual is registered to vote and.his or liar address for snail, where tax returns are filed, where tan automobile is registered, and where a homeowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken, however, the critical element is that of intent. While declarations of intent are significant, they are not determinative.

The acts must be examined as well."
(Id., at p. 14.)
In short, the determination of residency is a very fact specific question. It must be undertaken with an eye towards determining the public offlicial's intent, when matched with the :factual scenario presented. Releve t factors in other cases that have either been pursued criminally or 5

Investigative flan
March 24, 2026
Page d
civilly, have included: voter registration; address for mail; where tax returns are filed; where an automobile is registered; where children go to school; where the public official spends their time; and where a horncowner's exemption or renter's credit is taken. Again, however, this is not an exhaustive list; and ether facts may help to determine intent.

Confiden#ia ty
Confidential personal and Briancial informa€i,on gathered in the course of the investigation shall not be provided to any party, including members of the City Council. Such information shall also he excluded from the Outside Counsel's written investigative report. Redacted versions o:f documents containing such infornrailon may be prn6ded to the City Council at their direction.

Exhibit C

Feb. 4, 2026
bear GaM
As I disamed in an earlier Unail, I am dow merds that show fw residency inside the city of Fairfield.

I ant oaring a narrative fbr context concerning the documents.

The council wanted to know where I was Hvin w came a candidate for Mayor in 2022.

My address wm, ��� Ivty husband fMd 1 hau&hi WA hqM§ ill 1993 and lived. there into 2025.

Please see a Fairfield Municipal Utilities bill from 1216122; a Republic Service's Bill paid on 11/17122; and a PG,& E bill paid 12/6/22 — all fbr the previous months, showing residency.

My husband and 1 in 2001 bought — Y9rf1eld, California 94534 as an investment property, We bad other rea4l estatb as snvestment in Fairfield, My husband, daughter and I have always spent an incrodibl a amount of time at the prey as 1t Q a lot of A waso we*Ang ut-raaeh that wi had to tehd to oily, and, we enjoy our time together there with our dogs. We have never lived there, but have stayed some nights there in an office spare my husband built for his roofing businsss. We celebrated anniversaries, hirthdays, ►d.�d BQs Iters, ;; cQnk noes :today. In £act,.l do,.my.busings there unless I'm at City Hall. Again, this has always been the case during my time as a council MOOPT.

The properly has one home on it and we have always leased it but. We never lived there. May tali4itzrnia Form 700, Sohedule Cs going bad to nur ptuciwe of this propel show this. My upcoming Form 700 will show the same. (See copy of my Form 700. It shows that the lease on the home brings in S14Q1 to $10,W iamally.his year's number will be 1 kha The Tsehedale 8, Interests in deal Property show that the property `s fair market value Is between $100,001,to S1.million. This year's value has znorettsed. (These documents ,are publio.record, of course).

Also please sea or tatr rehm, Suplemental faeome end Less -statements for 2023 and 2424.

These are confidential documents, Both show that ad:365 Wr rental days.

When we complete this year's taxes, the same -will be true.

When we sold our Primary Residence at , we intended to t*e the profit and buy a condominium inside Fa{tfleld. U'ntfoatinstely, the loses rateswere and eontittue to be too high.

We still have the f=ds to i>Yvest in a now primary residence and folly itund to do so.

We rented a large container that we keep at theproperty that has all of our household t� in it, save a couple of pans and some oiothw. (Please see Allied Storage Container rewiptfar $162.56 monthly.) This is a temporary expense as we won't need the container when we get our new home in lti "eld.

Meanwhile, because I must live inside the city limits as Mayor, we moved into a family menrber's plane in Fairfield. Bemuse this is her iurtgt me home, all utilities were set up.

I am providing the address via City of Fairfield offtgiIowa ayroll Statement and my voter
rogiinli�n, which Ari llow 00011941 fOr §I4�i��.(990 dOCU liOO), ail§ Rniam of Voters Roll shows i voted from the Fairfield precinct in the last election.

My husband and I continue paying higher insurance rates on our Immoad Property because it is not our residence, but a rental and business property, as we always intended (See LimOlgidg Protoolor DWATO&H PA_Q.fTOM FOMOM �n prano far current year. This is confidential id6ftatift).

We also pay a higher loan amount because it's an investment property. If we intended to lave at the IM address, we would.,ehange both of those things, As longtime real estate investors, W 4ndormo fhq gainplai itgg irlyoftnt Bfqpqr�o lull wg on't into JUA throwing money away.

Thank you for considering what I have, written and the accompanying documents. I look forward to resolving what is a political attack against ray family°s good name.

Thank you,
CA�4
Catherine May
Mayor of Fairfield ,

f�� r„
29al lndustrlals tr
Falrf[old CA 0453MBOODO
Gustomar5ervice (707)437-8900
RepubticServices.com/SUP P art
important Information
Effective January 1,2023 there is a 7.78% rate inorease for all customers.

Payntant- Ttrank.Ysru QQ1:21 102o
Accour'tNumber
Invoice Number
0846-111869039
invoice Crate
October 31, 2022
Previous Balance
$03.06
Payments/Adjusiments
-$83.9e
Current lnvolaeCharges
563.86
Totai Amount Diie
Payment Due 66te
$63.96
November 20, 2022
CURRENT INVOICE CHATtC3E9
L7 or ic,0 i3fare4,�@. �,1�1�1' n i ,r/ic.c��.crarr� tr.►rf:y°. ,�:,y.,-.••�..{` 0

x,finity
H eilo Catherine MOYq
Thank you for choosing Minity.

Account Number Billing Date i Services From page
Dec 07, 2022 Dec 17. 2022 to Jan 16, 2023 1 of 7
You,- bilkat a glarWti
Fo 94534-3332
Previous balance S303 V
Payment - tFark yoJ rtor 20-S303.es
Balance frxwafd SU.00.

Regu'ar mcrthy charges Pa;a 3 S281.91
Taxes, fees and other 014rges Pain 3 S2t.97
NP• charges S303.86
Need help?
Visit ximity.cnm custonlersupport cr see page 2 for other ways to contact us.

Your biii expiained
• Pl��ss se. the important Information enclasad with this bill about price changes to services In ycur area, effective January 1, 2023.
• This page gives you. a quick summary of your monthl;
till. A detailed breakdown of your charges begins on
page 3.
• Any payments received or account activity after Dec 07, 2022 will show uo on your next bill. View your most up- to-date account balance at xiinity.com/my'account.

Get#
P aase wrae : ac=it nurnbct of yuu: cWX or rr:c�; Wass ram_ Detach the CAitt+n ; crtcn 01 Iris bJ and anC.'ilsa vrth ya r ps}rart M— + -- Y�+ - —

AACCOU1it RQ:

ENERGY STATEMENT Statement Date:
11 /17/2022
www.Pge.comlMyEner9y
Due DatO:
1210812022
Your AGc-QurlL,9ucl M8rY
service For.,
Atnauflt Due on previous Statement
$193.61
.193.61

CATHERINE MOY
Payments) Received Since Last Statement
$0.00
FAIRFIELD, CA 94534
Previous unpaid Balance
$85,76
Curfent PG&E Electric Delivery Charges

43.68 C ileetltrn bout your bill?
Electric Generation Charges
92,255
Current Gas Charges
Mon. rl 7 o,m.-7 part.

Saturday 8 Wrrl.4 PM
Total Arf aunt Due by 12106/2022
• :

Ahone;1-300.743.5000
wyuw,p9e.cott3tf�yEnefgy .

Waj-� To .Pay
www.pge'CoM1way-qtQpay
CompetWA �.
�rtii$Pttr,sl}ltzOHtst�iry M _ »__. -I Year Lael Currant $460
1,3�T1. 1
•
VAA
f $3[iQ .

Elaotric k4+q�
v�
f
1 stunt n
2oz2
111131 GasIl��rmlony
j 6n6 p3�ttri31 S# 1f12 71ki 3fi5 Vld �16 7/3 EdeEB 91f911541 f
sae
s � E1ecEric l�
........ VletftiV�tRv.pgc,comfMYenergy r�ra rielsllcd wo COMparrsun E
-.

Important Messages EOGuromentchargtes frorrt:sn.eaergytprevldE�► .

Your charges an this page are separated into delivery charges from PG&E and icategeneAlar s p other than PG&E. These two charges are for Moran
t services andAre not duplicate oh�rges.
the
The W ntor 710r 1 (lfaaelinal season u daily, winter nteo baseline a I wake starling Na ember 1 will gndrya r tiatEy stumt ter base na allowanourtotal ce 1 r any days I lgs wore aafoue ted period beta using your
overnber t.
days In your billing p
..«.-«...c:g.YGt;1ka:°. t1c:M,iyt�Y.;'•i,•.�y,•-v,*9-"*u9'iiei+.v�of+r r:•-Xietibi:SY� t�?i7'w�Y'L�-...1'.'St

102100395-NVH-0395

SCHEDULE B
Interests In Beal Property
(Inoluding Rental Income)
P ASOEBSOR'8 PARCgL.NUPABER OR STRSETALIDRESs
CITY
PAirtiold
FAIR MARKET VALUE IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATC:

52.QW 410,000
sio,001- $100,000 _ _ /_ )24--j--jn-
S100.otl1-S1,0no09 AOQUIRED DISPOSM
over Sa,oecmo
NATURE OF INTERE911'
(] Ovmer OPIDeod of Trust Q udum m
0 Leaeolow �}
yre.=fig 0(1{fll
IF RENTAL PROIi&RYY, GROSS INCOME REOSIV90
(] So - S40D r Sst1p-s1,090 (34I'O01- 510,o00
M $10,001 - sico" Q OVER S wx0o
SOURCES OF RENTAL INCOME: if you Mvn a 109E or granter
Interest, lkt the name of each tenant that N B slnole source of Inoome of 310,000 or mono.

WAS
Vamajo) redacted
CITY
00 hEarne
Ffoy, Cnth rSno'•H 't,
8 PARCEL NUMBER OR STRBETADORESS
FAIR MARKET VALUE IF APPLICABLE; LIST DATC-:
❑ $Z000 - SID,=
�$10,001 - 5100.000-
51o0.e01 •S1.Woow ACQUIRED nlspaskp
a Over EI,ODD,000
NATURE OF INT£RBST
rj 0ww4IPR7ead dt Truat NaeemeM
yn. rewwre 0wor
IF RENTAL PROPERTY GROB$ INCOME RECEIVED
[130 - UN 0 d60D-SIX) © $1.001 - $10,000
❑ 310,001 - simow L] OVER 310D,OD0
SOURCES OF RENTAL INCOME: It You own a 10% or greater
Interest, list the name of each tenant that is a single smirce of Income of.STO.DOD or more,
[J Nona
* Yau are not required to report loans from a commercial fending institution trade in the lender's re9ularcaurse of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to your official status. Personal: loans and loans received not in a lender's regular course of business Must be disclosed as follows:

NAME OF Lr.NoFa* I t NAME OF LENDER'
ADDRESS fgodhowAd*#wAcuptam) I

BUSINBSBACTIVITY, IF ANY, OFLINDOR
INTERS0 RATE TERM (14onthuWyeare)
_% () Nerve
HIGHEST BALANCtr DURINa.REPORTINO FORtdo
[] um - $1,000 ❑ SIAM - $ I0,09O
Q 31%001 - StoO.ariO ovgR 3100,0W
❑ tauemrda, If epAmbio
I ADDRESS .(Sueln =Addre38A0MPI0b1e)
BUSINESS AO MTY. IF ANY, OF LENDER
INTEREST RATE TERM (MonbialYearal.
_% QNone
HIGHEST DALANCE bURIM RSPORTIN© PERIOD
❑ SSW -$LODO [JW03I-810,0W
0$1D,O01.31co.O00 0OVER510),Doo
❑ t3unrrnw R apptubfa
comments:
iD PC iemr 700 - Schedule a I1e14AN%]
advke@k+Fc.ea.gov•Rda•k7rrgTZ•wunb.f�rei.{av

102100395-1IFH-0395

SCHEDULE C
Income, Loans, &t Business
Positions
(other than Gifts and Travel Payments)

NAME OF SOURCE OF INCOME
City of Fairfield
1000 Webster St. ---
ADDRESS (Business AddressAccepteble)
Fairfield, CA 94533
BUSINESS ACTIVITY. IF ANY, OF SOURCE
Policv

YOUR BUSINESS POSITION
Ha oz
GROSS INCOME RECEIVED ❑ No Income - Business Position Only ❑ $500 - S1,000 ❑X S1,001 - $10,000
❑ $10,001 - 3100,000 ❑ OVER S100,0DO

CONSIDERATION FOR WHICH INCOME WAS RECEIVED
❑X Saary ❑ Spouses or registered domestic partnar's Income (For selkniployed use Schedule A-2)
Partnership (Less than 10% ownership. For 10% or greater use Schedule A•2)
❑ Sale of (P.0 , ar boot WJ
❑ Loan repayment
u Commission or G R_-wl in:zne, is: oxn -o--� J s rc Ica ns�-, (Derufde)
CALIFORNIA FORM 700
FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES CO:.IrtISSION
Name
May, Catherine H

NAME OF SOURCE OF INCOME
ADDRESS (Sus-teu^sAddrassAaoepfebte)

BUSINESS ACTIVITY, IF ANY, OF SOURCE

YOUR BUSINESS POSITION
GROSS INCOME RECEIVED No Income - Business Position Only ❑ swo - s1,000 ❑ $1,001 - 310,0D0
❑ 310,001 - $100,0Do ❑ OVER S100.000

CONSIDERATION FOR WHICH INCOME WAS RECEIVED
Salary ❑ Spouse's or repistorad domestic partner's income (For seHamployed use Schelde A-2)
L� Partnership (Less than 10% owriership. For 10% or greater use Schedule A4.)
❑ Sale o1 tom, p pwy, car, eat etc.)
❑ Loan repayment
I--j Commission or ❑ Rental Income, Is! e h seats d S10,000 o, mcre I I Other r oe)
❑ Other f
tlJo:c+ve)
rol7S1
* You are not required to report loans from a commercial lending institution, or any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to your official status. Personal loans and loans received not in a lender's regular course of business must be disclosed as follows:

I I:i-REST RATE iERld (!,1on;hsa'car;)

NAME OF LENDER'
% C t:orc
ADDRESS (Business Address Acceptable)

SECURITY FOR LOAN
❑ None ❑personal residence

BUSINESS ACTIVITY, IF ANY, OF LENDER
❑ Real Property a— ee3—

HIGHEST BALANCE DURING REPORTING PERIOD
❑ $5w - S1,ow
City
❑ $1,001 - $10,000
❑ Guarantor
❑ S10,001 - $100.000
❑ OVER $100.000
❑ Other
Comments:

FPPC Form 700 -Schedule C (2024/2025)
[email protected] • ee0.175.3772 • www•rppc.ce.eov

Supplemental Income and Loss 2023
.PULE E partnerships, S corporations, estates, trusts, REMICS, etc.) 1040) (From rental real estate. royalties, pa Arr,u,men:

Attach to Form 1 t140, 1040-SA,1 s and , or l test seionce no. 13 y'unern d Ne 7recswj
Go to www.irs.9ov/ScheduleE for Instrueuons and the latest Information•. ya., scc!d security number ins! Revere* Service
mats) sho-n
r ee `K"
!IETH J. AND CATlit.tur", °1' Royalties
�cl income or Loss From Rental Real Estate and
Note: If you are s the business of renting persoatoper 40. use schedule C. See instructions. If you are an individual, rePoQNo farm rental income or loss from Form 4835 on page .. -
in 2023 that would require you to file Fonn(s) 1099? See instructions... ....... .... ❑Yes �No A Did you make any Payments "'
Be It'Yes; did you or wilt you file �(st
orms) 1099.
.................
1 a P I address of each prop; city,^tale, ZIP code) ri oaR'14 e ' Ilstea
4ewerty:
2 above creparrtt the number of fapirerental and
Check the Q!Y Cox
personal use days•only d•yyoou oint ventut the re. See Insuctions, o file as
a 4uahiled j 3 Vacationishort-Term Rental
t Single Family Residence 4 Commercial
2 ,.lull! -Family Residence
Fair Rental Days Personal Use' D"
g I QJY
A 365
13 C
5 Land 7 seif•Rental — — — — — —
6 Royalties a Othar (describe)
A
Income:
a
.............
3 Rents receive ... - -
4 q Royalties receiveo-.,............ -
Expenses:
5 Advertising ...... ............................. .... 5 7
6 Auto and travel (see tnSWctforas). • • • • •' . "' ........ .
. ..
7 Cleaning and maintenance......... .
.....
a
...............

B Commissions ......... • .. ..
. . 9
9 insurance .......................................... ....... 10 Legal and other Professionaitees'........ _...
10 11
......
11 Management fees ...... .... ...........
tAenOage Interest qa:d to banks, etc. (see instrucUans) ... 12 13
12 .. - .. • ........
13 Other interest ..............
14 14 Repairs .........................
15 15 Supplies ............................
16s
is Taxes ........................................... .. 17 17 Utiiities.. • ...... ...... ......
18 Depreciation expense or depletion ................... 19 • 19
19 other (list) 5EE 514-5-__-------------
. 20
20 Total expenses. Add lines 5 through 19... . • • • ......... 21 Subtract line 20 from line 3 (rents) and/
must fd®
instructionlseto tintd ourt h' yu
.... 2't r
Form 6198 ................. .
22 Deductible rental real estate loss after limitation, if any. on 22 29e
Form 8582 (see lnstru,ported n . e r rties - . - ...... 23b 23a Total of all amounts re on line 3 for all rental properties rties • • -
b Total of all amounts reported on line 4 for all royalty tie . 23c c Total of all amounts reported on line 12 for all properties ............. 23d I, oral of all amounts reported on line 18 for all properties .. • • • • • • ... ' '' 29a e Total of all amounts reported on line 20 for all Properties 24 income. Add positive amounts shown on li^° 21 • Do net include any losses. . 25 Losses. Add royalty losses from line 21 and rental real estate losses from line 22. Enter total losses )+are- - . 25 26 T°UI rental real tale and royalty income o�(loss). Combine Imes ly to )vj. also enter 26 j the rerett here. N etts N, III. and L , and .hne on pace 2 do not ap p' i ) .....

Quin 1 line i 0thanYi", include lhs amouat m lit_
• Schedule E
this amount on Schedule t (F 0�, ......... . ............. . ... . . fatal ontine Cl cr paCe 2 .'
SAA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions.

u';B to IS:��J74
MULE E Supplemental Income and Loss®��
1040) (From rental real estate, royalties, partnerships, S corporations, estates. trusts, REMICs, etc.) Attach to Form 1040, 1040•SR, 1040•NR, or 1041. Acea­en:
mitt um Treaswy Go to vvWv.lrs.gov1SeheduIcE for instructions and the latest information. se,u nee No. 13 teremm seti%ee ' Ycui $oi<at sbebtlty ii 1181
shown On fetLm
EfGlta r.rc� —..,....�.._ ---
_.tl Income or Loss From Rental Real Estate and Royalties Note: It you are m the business of renE ng personal properly, use Schedule C. See instructions. If you are an individual, report farm renal income or lass frcm Form 4835 on page 2, line 40. , ©Yes �No A Did you make any payments in 2024 that would require you to (ire Farms) 1099? See insuucUons ................. . . ❑ No
1099?.. ...... ............... ❑ Ycs
nr 4`II You file required Form(s) • .
e It 'Yes,' die y'..
1 a physical aadress of etch ^rep rty (street, city, state, ZIP code) A FAIRFIELD CA 94534
C
tyrpp�e� t . 2 For each rental real estate property listed 1 Fair Rental Days ii Parsons! Use Days _ Qd 1 b tktrnlete6c"+ ' above, report the number of fair rental and A personal use days. Check the QJV box A 365
only d YYou meet the requirements to file as 8
B a qualified joint venture. See msVuctions. C
c Mr
Type of PFraperty
1 Stng!e y Residence 3 Vacationlshort•Term Rental 6 Royalties B Other (describe) — — — — — — — — — 2 C: uftrFam:ry Residence 4 Commercial ' — — — — — — —
n..,n.rftasr —
A I_ B
Income:
3 3 Rents received .........................
4 4 Ro 21ues.ceceived......................---............... .

Expenses:
5 5 Advertising ........ ................................... . 6
6 Auto and travel (see instructions)...... • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • 7
7 Cleaning and maintenance.........- ..••• .••••• -•
8 ..................... .
a Commissions ..... ..... • • • • •
• • "
9 Insurance ..........................................

Legal and other professional fees ...........................

TO
11 Management lees .......................................... 11 12
12 Mortgage irtteresl paid to banks, etc (See ina"Ut:flora)................... 13 13 Otheiinterest.............................................. 14 14 Repairs ................ ...........
15 15 Supplies ....................... ..................... .......

1.6 16 Taxes ........................... ......................... 17 17 Utilities .................... .............. .......... 18 Depreciation expense or depletian .......................... 18 19 Other (list) ,$IF, STM 5----_-----------
20 20 Total expenses. Add lines 5 through 19.. . ......... .... .
21 Subtractt line 20 from line 3 (rents) andf
Insttrruct artso* It find OuuttlIf you Must 01uee
Form6198........................................,
21 22 Deductible rental real estate loss after limitation, if any, on 1( Form 8582 (see instructions)..
23 a Total of ail amounts reported on line 3 for all rental properties ................... . 281b b Total of all amounts reported on line 4 for all royalty properties ............... • • . 23c 23d
c Total of all amounts reported on line 12 for all properties ........... . . d Totat of all amounts reported on line 18 for all properties • • .. • . • 23e e Total of all amounts reported on line 20 for all properties ......................... . 24 Income. Add positive amounts shown on line 21. Do not include any losses ........ , . 25 Losses. Adc royalty losses tfrrom line 21 and rental real estate losses from line 22, Enter total losses here ... `6 the its ie� 11 Pa(u II II �snd117,1and linof
40(on pap Combine
donnot apply to24 nYou, alsoteenler
his amount an S<haEula 1 (Fenn 160), line 5. Werwise, include this amount in the total to line :1 on page 2 .... . ................................. . .............. .............

BAA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions.

POIZ2301L 070125r24

Allied Storage Containers
PO BOX 12684
FRESNO, CA 93778
Phone: 559.268-2501
Received From
i:en Kfoq
Date
1/23/2026
Payment Method
Mastcr Card
Check.+Ref No
Invoices Paid
Payment Receipt
PaymentAmourtt $162.56
Total Amount Due $0.00
Date
Invoice Number
Amount Due
Amount Applied
1 /72026
R200103186
S 162.56
S 162 5G

CATHERINE MARIE MG', 753'32 PEP".' 44
.... (CM)
I I
I
County Info'
Name l Fria Nswa
Ilama
ID: MW
PreX.

ACTIVE
Fe.: Cm.ThEPIIIE
IIFI DEi M-4 ST -71jS •-,Lril,
ReAton: [�-n —
IIdcg,': MARE
AJfjdavR:- F-ACII-SE1525
Lea: 140Y
--SIq:- 114,27,32.

A."'o
Stew
Dt.14y Lc: 100— 3SN:
_-__:2715
P,64.%,.cc
z -
Q tar
cnljy: I Uhi-i Er, STATES OF AIERICA
Frac;
Dir!
camof:
i�^
Ty;c
11 ril
swBx; IMSENTERST
pur. = Ems:

CIV. F.-AIRFIELD 4' Cti: FAIRFIELD V: Zp: 94511
Fw-:

Cla ate per*
Amcnal Aedrep
Ok Camcd
i--: --- -

Advicu nnvunt• '363.23
:iblo'FclnrcM-Fayrdl6�,�rorant707-A2�-7u1:

COUNCIL. CITY CLERK. TREASURER 9J 6,EEK! Y
1'-�_m5
12 t?f 0?5-1J?-'QO2o
510CJ
30113

CATHOW I M MOY
(1010)
E;
R.,TE DAYSIRRS
Cuf:ZENT
`yTD DEDUCTIONS
CURAEN-1
VTO V.1PLR
Et.i?LRYTD
RES tARN
0 00 E0.00
f1memlso Tx.,
600*0 MEDICARE TA;4
low"

AUTO ALLOW
SO.00 O.W
Soon
IO.DO 0�
WOO
imalm
BdEDICAL
*me
TOTAL
�
DENTAL
goo
wo
�
WOOD woo
011ow

PERS ELECEEI

PERS ELECERI
000

PERSSURVIVOR
TOTAL
DEP031'i 8
t
SIC;;

0.4:00 OCLOC
00000
0,CG70 O.CC{0 0.010
D.CJCO 00000
FMIG TU3 �tE6iP-' 0118
Fell
E::TRAA

VACATION
O.rl;x 0C'M
O.C:'CJ
OCCCO
PERSVIAl
O.=O 0G000
0DY_J

0.CCO 007C0 0.0mo
SG++
VAL

0.C:00 0rrlm

0.00m
O.C400 0.4OOD 0.0000
F.GLIL

0.CvCO 0N00

0.06%10
OCOOO OO 0.0140
TYCE
CU�LTEi3T
lib
Tz ,e!a Pay
muft
Gars ?a,
Dedw.om
6000
t•13t Pay
avow
"ewe
ndv.-.aovb
I:.r.-,�-t
Atli CTi Y��'!�C'i L1
1J31PQ^.G
51050
Ii�OG `;Jabscat 5�; ea:
faie!r,CAS".533
�� I- �Gp,4Jn�r
Ih•

xltyllt;,•
r:•;..,..
024'12i01 AM
ry t�;l,:•�.;1
5/30/20M12:01AM
%KennethMo
Fairfl453A�3�32
!x: •'netts Gr+:}fl�i!
Falrfleld, CA94594.1445
:t:t,texvniva'iI;
Fire lnsurance.exchange
6301 owensmouth Ave.

Woodland Hills, CA91367
Apr A�t��7w P;_ �n �T}[{�
IN"I'mku�'ti c
*0160 see -Information on Additlona! Feesbelaw
Thisit;naxakll#.
i:?~)::Yi'�.1'ktA'V'AKtNk:Su:Sl'Y.-AYA1Jlu:.'!,-YN S:cfal..rJ::SSL'J�+>.�'=ti:t �L :1zt:14KlY.C.tx.

Declar-�Jbn Page
• f,�5�r���1
,OvIE15
(�f1IIC±�'#Qt)ifi�xif:
f���•l�ii4�i�.'l�-��'. - .... ........ ........
1 AM
-,1r:±.rtlt:cn
5/30/202012:0I AM
"
Ken nethMoy
"dlski sets InfOrmtaota-o?s.Addltlotaal:Feeabelow
11K. 1 I..'.1�>. "
•Sic.'t. )x.�'.: iCCJd:J..:L'GL•!tl'S 47Ph'7.1.'.::Y:�Y7 ! 1T'i.., ..'�..w Fair#lald, C i 44
tr'::��r(rs+t•rr,?;,
Fire lnsuraneeecchanga
63o1a0wensnlouth Ave.

Woodland Hills, CA91367

Exhibit D

From, Gary Scott Winuk
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 202610:47 PM
To: Moy, Catherine
Subject: Request for Information and interview
Attorney -Client Privileged Information Not Subject to Disclosure Under the California Public Records Act
Mayor,
As part of the investigation, I am requestingyou provide me with the following initial information. I would also like to schedule an interview with you on either Wednesday April 15 or Thursday April 16 if you are witting and available. The interview will be conducted under penalty of perjury (as will all, interviews conducted In the course of the Investigation per the direction of the Council). It shouldn't take more than 2-3 hours, i would also fte to interview any other people that reside at the Property Three apartment, including your spouse. Please let me know If you are willing to help facilitate this. last, l would like to visit your current residence at Property Three at a mutually agreeable time.

Here are the initial information requests:

List of the names of all Individuals who reside at Property Three (the apartment).

List of your, your spouse's and anyone else residing at property Three's vehicles including make, model, color, license plate number and model year. (e.g. 2020 Blue Ford F150, license 7HUF123) and how long each person has owned the vehicle(s).

List of any witnesses who live at Property Three that you feet we should contact to verify that you reside there.

Also please let me know If you are now represented by counsel and I will be sure to communicate through your attorney for all requests.

Thankyou
Gary Winuk
Gary S. Winuk
Attorney
Kaufman legal Group, APC
4281 Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
213,452.6568
Celt 916-996-5455
gwinul(@kaufmantegalgroup.com

Exhibit E

1 2
3 4
5 G
8 9
10 11
12 13
lit
15 16
17 Is
19 20
21 22
23 24'
25 26
27 28
CONFIDENTIAL - FOIt CL S'ED SESL lQiN
1, Catherine Moystate as follows;

1. My legal name is Catherine Moy. I am the Mayor of the City of Fairfield and represent voters of the City of Fairfield at-lar};e on the City Council, I tam also fanl:iliar with the questions concerning the hatter of my residency raised by four members of the City Council. I slibinit this statement to inake clear that I ant, ha ve:always been, and intend to remain a 1"airf ieid resident, I have firsthand knowledge of the matters described herein, and if called upon to do so, I could and would testily competently thereto.
2, I have a lifelong connection. to Fairfield. My parents were; raised in Fairfield. I was born and raised in. Fairfield. After marrying, I started my family in Fairfield with my husband, Ken Moy, and we raised. our daughter here. I have lived niy entire life in Fairfield,.I. have every Intention of remaining a. proud resident of Fairfield; and I will be laid to rest here with illy. family,

3. Given my deep Fairfield community connections, in 2008, the City Council appointed. me to represent tiles people of the Fairfield all the City Council following the death of Councilmember rrank Kardos. I was subsequentbt elected to the City Council in 2009; 2014, and 201 S. In 2022, the voters of Fairfield elected sloe Mayor. 4, As Mayor, 11'aithflilly serve the people of Fairfield. Now, just months away froni the end of iay terns, political opponents are clainlitig that 1 ceased to be resident of the City of Fairfield and that it is not my domicile. Not only do these allegations lack evidence, butthis investigation. is unquestionablya. waste of taxpayer resources at a time when Fairfield is facing a significant $1,0,000,000 structural budget deficit and the City Council is trying to educate residents on the need to raise their own taxes this November. This cynical political attack also seeks to Offoetively disenfranchise the voters wlio elected me -to office.
5, To bring this cluestioning to an end, I am submitting this statement to clarify the facts that establish that I have always been domiciled in Fairfield.and intend to live here indefinitely. I have been willing to cooperate with tills investigation and made every effort to provido documents establishing my Fairfield domicile to Mr. Winuk, the outside investigator. Anions the doouinents I have providod are my veriftbleenergyy and cable bills, employment records, tax returns; W2 Forms; s-rivi,smam' ov CA"i'TunuNC Moy

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16

1.7 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
voting records with address; insurance records; and Form 700s signets under penalty of perjury that go back to 2008. 1 also spoke with Mr. Winuk in early 2026, where 1 explained much of the same inforimation in this statement to him in response to his questions. 1 am submitting this statement in lieu of sitting for another interview because the facts of my Fairfield domicile are straightforward.

6. In 1993, my husband Ken and l bought our family hoarse on Alsoin Fairliold. This is where Ken and I raised our daughter, and 1 lived there continuously until we sold the home in 2025. Our AMW house was always my primary residence; as my Dorm 700s filed with the Fair Political Practices Commission — which are sworn under penalty of perjury — show unequivocally. See Cxhi bit A for a copy of my Driver's License with my a" home as my atddruss.

7. Ken and 1 also own a rental proporly, located in Suisun Valley, California, 50 feet away :front the Fairfield city limits, which has one rental residence and a 400 square -foot office space, The residence has always been rented to a terlarit since we bought it in 2001. Attached at Exhibit 8 are checks reflecting rent payments our tenant made for the residence; in Suisun Valley. I have already sharers. evidence that I pay taxes on this rental incotno with Mr. Winuk, the outsido investigator. Because this property was not my primary residence {and never has been}, I never took a Homeowners Exemption on this property, and it was also reported oil ally Forin 700 Statement of 13conornle lnterests: The office space oil the property was used by Ken when he was still Nvorking, before two types of arthritis put hum in a wheelchair and left him disabled. I have always maintained commercial insurance on the Suisun Valley property, and the lean we received to purchase the property was as commercial lean.

8. Starting in 2024, Ken and I began to experience chronic financial strain.

Though our costs of living are modest, we found ourselves struggling to make ends meet every month.

Ken hasn't worked since he became disabled .16 years ago, and my compensation as Mayor is approximately $700 biweekly. Our only other source of income has been the rental income from our Suisun Valley. property, but any income generated goes towards paying off the mortgage on the property. Our biggest monthly expense was our mortgage on the Potrero house. 1n February 2025, we reluctantly closed on the sale of that home because of Our financial strain. 2 s' xrr5MPN,), or CA'1'nmr. tvtoY

2 3 f
4 t
5 '
G
7 S
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 2(
2'
fanned to tisc the rooeeds of the sale on tho IM property to g, we always p p
Ay a sinaller home in 1,aivfield with a lower mortgage piiy'rient. 1 knew it Quid take sat time to er David Gassaway that 'Would
nd the right place, so prior to closing the sdie, l told City Manab ley property while searching for a new Fairfield home. He said ,mporar'sly stay at the Suisun Val
,(�});I 1-Ie knew we were struggling financially, 1 told hint that, be ca;ise 1 work full�fii.irie for the city
�JK two weeks; l couldn't get another job•
out take home less than $704 every
10, For a few weeks, Ken and 1 stayed together in the Office space at ttie Suisun Ken
Valley property. I3uring this tune, we both continued to search .or properties in Fairfes laid sale
using
for
and t virtually toured a trailer on West Texas street, and constantly searchedd told herwe `were looking Redfin, 2:lllow, and liantes.cairr. 1n die spring of �ti��, I called tt realtoi ttn l what
for a new place in l-airfield. 1(an and I have purchased other rental houses and underst of pr lximately
public servant salary oi' pp
we could afford and not afford. With the interest rates high, MY p $700 every two weeks, the rental incaine being our only Othersource of incantir, and a entagl$gii can the t asked the realtor about r
rental, we wouldn't be able to buy something right away', So, Fairfield, jkg,ain, with my pay putting ine in the category of "extremely low income," she told n7e it would be tough even qualifying for an apartment.

11. This information threw all unexpected wrench into our plans, it n+�t only fairly straightforward plan to obtain new home ownership in Fairfield, but it also took a. upended our f Y 6
toil ai ina and Ken and Our relationship. , and her
12, in March 2025,1 moved in with my friend. office. W c have a French adult daughter, l on .in Fairfield, Ken stayed at the
a home with
as a dog wlta can't shale other daps. �,1je decided our bulldog and bulldog, and
Ken would stay at the Suisun Valley prapertY• It also gage us space apart to think and beat,

13. and I lived together at the apartment, sharing in household S duties, such as conking, grocery shopping and cleaning. 1 continued tnY tivork as Mayor. I regularly
Eo-day living au at�housc:. 1 had a key to the house,
!6 conducted all of illy ordinary dayw Y insulin in the rei'ri eratar, and stored z7 In addition to moving hi illy clothes and personal items, l kept my . h
runt )5, asthma medicine, and other critical iriedicaulons at the house. i spent tlirie th�F�vvh� was not
B l 4 3 _ _ -•.-
si,A'rgMlNr ot- cart-trtitrt%;�io�

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
II
12 13
14 15
16,
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
at work, visiting Ken from time to time to make sure he was taken care of. Sometimes I would work remotely from the Suisun Valley office space to spend time with him.

14. At about the end of June 2025, 1 moved into my daughter's two -bedroom apartment on in Fairfield. I lived in the spare bedroom; my daughter and her boyfriend were in the main bedroom. Since we're family, I didn't sign a "lease," but because I was living with them, I contributed to the household in other ways. I easily slipped back into "mom - mode," making dinners, doing dishes, and helping keep the house in good shape. For example, on my way home from work at City Hall or from the office in Suisun Valley, l would stop at Food 4 Less or Raley's and pick up groceries for everyone and make dinner. From June 2025 until March 2026, 1 occupied their spare bedroom — hung my clothes in the closet, kept belongings in the dresser, and generally conducted my ordinary day-to-day living activities there. I was planning on staying there as long as it took to find a new Fairfield house, and I even changed my voter registration and official city documents to this address.

15. Since selling th4wome, I never stopped trying to find a new home in Fairfield. In January 2026, a friend of mine, bought a new home in the unincorporated area of Fairfield. She and her husband decided they would keep their old home on in Fairfield and would rent it to me. Amy's offer was a lifeline for me and Ken. The home was a perfect Fit, and I quickly signed a lease on January 15, 2026. See Exhibit C.

16. 1 packed up my belongings in preparation for moving into th� house. But on January 22, 2026, just 9 days before 1 was scheduled to move in, a tractor ran over and crushed who was life -flighted in an attempt to save his life. He had many surgeries and was in a coma; thokobviously couldn't move out of their home given the circumstances. To give them time to recover from the accident, 1 delayed my move -in and temporarily stayed between my daughter's place — where some of my things remained — and the Suisun Valley office.

17. In April 2026, we began moving into the property. Sadly, Mr. Mad to have another operation on April 15, 2026, because his foot collapsed again and the surgeons had to reattach a tendon. Ken and I are happy to finally be setting up our new home and are

STATEMENT OF CATI IERINE MOY

I ` looking wi%% ud In lu►.tntg nui Ltmlly galhcringe Ihcrr WL We hopeful In muyt: hilly ndo the home I►tdine the grid ofthis month, l►cndmgEOM yei�
IR I•ur my entire lilt I Iwtic been.► I nnlu lil r cd onr daul!hlcr• mt is where hen i our daughlvr, and I went to,chuul, It•s tyhcie I work, and it is MY home I .ven yyhut uc soW � � t, it im intention to renunn domiciled in I'anihld In titer. We %411=yiih Urc swicd 7 purpose of buying another home in I airfield nn other city c%en crossed my mind 'I hough thi% past Y year presented uncslxxled cltmlh ngc�, one Ihmg hny rcmamed true I have never at no Iximl. for not j 9 one nionient had any mien ion to Ix nniuicnily live outside the City of I•airlield Fairiidd is m% Ili home and where I have ahyays lived When I die. my family and Inend, will bury me in FairlielJ with 1 I my Calmly.
1' it• I
Executed this 22nd day of April, 202o, at Fairfield. C ali6ornia 1,! i
I41 i
ICI �
16 171
1911,
,iil1 I!
i21 �
1411i
I
27 I•111-Atl'NI Urt AIt11•NINt-\n►1

EXHIBIT

California USA DRIVER LICENSE 4,111Jw

CLASS C

ERD NONE
MI OY

CATHERINE MARIE
qwf I -
—NONE
F BRN
[ T-03" 185 1b
ED 1112212022621371AAFQ27
CLASS: C - Veh w/GVWR 526000, No WC
ENDORSEMENTS, None
RESTRICTIONS: None
Fr�

4. 1'
C
ti
11281961
EYE£ BLU
IS5
11/22/2022
Tt`i &-ams bs hsuadas a tanss u
drMs a molar v%hbds; @ don not
satkb§mb s0;60y to r sxVJu
voter rapm Waton, or papt

-RIBI B

CHECK 0 OF 0 Front I &uk
POOH »
JVMoman Chm Bank /
fr
• oo+rr ord Bonn w.1v. CHECK 0 OF 0 From I ��
1 c4Assic 62430
POOH a►nomaa
� L
p 9d.maw
�, c
.,. \ • • oOo.n�ai�:•i+'+•wwrr.nX,:w�e►�wwn./kn•s.r.e\• 18x4
� CHECN 0 OF 0 Franc

CHECK 0 OF 0 FION I Gcl,
< CHECK 0 OF 0 From I Wei,
CHECK OOFO Front I Back

CLASSIC
POOH �64.,13
t!,V to do
So. 0 0
Chose G&n4;�k
SM Adals. Ti russ-im

EXHIBIT

LEASE
BASIC RENTAL Ai►KF;I';1'iENT OR RESEDENTim. i,F;,ksv
Tliis Rental Agreement or Residential Luce shall evidence the corn onditions under which the parties %those signatures appear below have agreed. Landlord/Lessor/Agen _ _ _ , shall he referred Ir as "OWNE'R" and Tcnant(spLessce, Cathenne Moy _ _ _ shall be: referred to as "RFSIDI?N"" As consideration for this agreement, OWNER agrees to rcntileasc to RESIDENT and RESIDENT use from OWNER for use solely as a private residence, the premises located at in the city of Fairfield i
I. TERNIS: RESIDENT agrees to pay in advance S 2.000 per month on the 1st ._ day of each month_ This agreement shall commence on Januar),ts and continue, (check one) : � _ untii _ w% a ieaschoid. Theteaftet it xitall bL unfe a ntuuth-to-ntuntit icnancv. if RESIDENT ,istuiei move from the premises prior to the expiration of this time period, he shall be liable for all rent due until such time that the Residence: is occupied by an OWNER approved paying RESIDENT and/or expiration of said time period, whichever is shorter.

B. until on a month -to -month tenancy until either party shall terminate this agreement by N , tend 'tn - t t a tc e .:On.

S::'t:7y II'..T.....A „0 ..,.. of tnwJJ.,On t0 .CirniJtateSi least �..�' j� j,T:C. C h� ,.a,,. GCri:JnBu

2. PAYMENTS: Rent and/or other charges arc to be paid at such place or method desipated by the owner as follows � All payments are to be made by check or money order and cash shall be acceptable. OWNER acknowledges receipt of the First Month's rent of S 2.000, and a Security Deposit of f Zero and idditinnnl c hnrPes;(eies for Nra fnr a total nnvment of S All payments are to be made payable t

3. SECURITY DEPOSITS: The total of the above deposits shall secure compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and shall be refunded to RESIDENT within wA days after the premises have been completely vacated less any amount necessm to pay OWNER, a) any unpaid rent, b) cleaning costs, c) key replacement costs, d) cost for repair of damages to premises and/or common areas above ordinary wear and tear, and c) any other amount legally allowable under the terms of this agreement. A written accounting of said charges shall be presented to RESIDENT within 30 days of move -out. If deposits do not cover such costs and damages, the RESIDENT shall immediately pay said additional costs for damages to OWNER.

4. LATE CI[ARGE: A late fee of S so, (not to exceed _% of the monthly rent), shall be added and due for any payment of rent made after the teth of the month. Any dishonored check shall be treated as unpaid rent, and subject to an additional fee of S NIA.

5. UTILITIES: RESIDENT agrees to pay all utilities and/or services based upon occupancy of the premises except Water, PGE. C�y��"

6. OCCUPANTS: Guest(s) staying over 15 days without the written consent of OWNER shall be considered a breach of this agreement ONLY the following individuals and/or animals, AND NO OTHERS shall occupy the subject residence for more than 15 days unless the expressed written consent of OWNER obtained in advance Ken and Cathenne Moy

7. PEPS: No animal, fowl, fish, reptile, and/or pet of any kind shall be, kept on or about the premises, for any amount of time, Nvithout obtaining the prior written consent and meeting the requirements of the OWNER. Such consent if granted, shall be revocable at OWNER'S option upon giving a 30 day written notice. in the event laws are passed or permission is granted to have a pet and/or animal of any kind, an additional deposit in the amount of S MA shall he rennired ninno with ndditinnnl monthly rent off NIA ninnp with the siunino of 0WrJFR'C Pest Ageement. RESIDENTalso agrees to carry insurance deemed appropriate by OWNER to cover possible liability and damages that may be caused by such animals.
a

8. I.IQVID FILLED FURNISHINGS: No liquid filled lurniturc, receptacle containing more than ten gallons of liquid is permitted without prior written consent and meeting the requirements of the OWNER. RFSIDF.NT also itglC<ea its cut ty ivautunce dimmed ulq►lupliatc by OW NFR to euvcl lxl,ailric luau laud luay [PC cauacd by welt iielna.

9. PARKING: When and if RESIDENT is assigned a parking arca/space on OWNER'S property, the parking nren/space shall he used exclusively for parking of passenger automobiles and/or those approvcd vehicles listed on RESIDL'N'I'S Application attached hereto. RESIDENT is hereby assigned or permitted to park only in the following area or space N.vwwy; street . The parking fee for this, space (if applticahlc is c ., WA macthly Said space shall not be used for the washing, painting, or repair of vehicles. No other parking space shall be used by RESIDENT or RESIDENTS guest(s). RESIDENT is responsible for oil leaks and other vehicle discharges for which RESIDENT shall be charged for cleaning if deemed necessary by OWNER. 10 NONE: RFSInFNT nloreec not to cause or allow any nnice or activity on the nremicec which might dict irh the peace and quiet ofanother RESIDENT and/or neighbor. Said noise and/or activity shall be a breach of this agreement.

11. DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: If the premises become totally or partially destroyed during the term of this Agreement so that RESIDENTS use is seriously impaired, OWNER or RESIDENT may terminate this Agreement immediately upon three day written notice to the other.

12. CONDITION OF PREMISES: RESIDENT acknowledges that he has examined the premises and that said premises, all furnishings, fixtures, furniture, plumbing, heating, electrical facilities, all items listed on the attached property condition checklist, if any, and/or all other items provided by OWNER are all clean, and in good satisfactory condition except as may be indicated elsewhere in this Agreement. RESIDENT agrees to keep the premises and all items in good order and good condition and to immediately pay for costs to repair and/or replace any portion of the above damaged by RESIDENT, his guests and/or invitees, except as provided by law. At the termination of this Agreement, all of above items in this provision shall be returned to OWNER in clean and good condition except for reasonable wear and tear and the premises shall be free of all personal property and trash not belonging to OWNER. It is agreed that all din, holes, tears, burns, and stains of any size or amount in the carpets, drapes, walls, fixtures, and/or uny uiilct Pali of the fnctuiatz, do nui cum6lutc lC<uunubIr aCal iuld Will.

13. ALTERATIONS: RESIDENT shall not paint, wallpaper, alter or redecorate, change or install locks, install antenna or other equipment, screws, fastening devices, large nails, or adhesive materials, place signs, displays, or other exhibits, on or in any portion of the premises without the written consent of the OWNER except as may be provided b.: !aw.
14: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE: RESIDENT shall deposit all garbage and waste in a clean and sanitary manner into the proper receptacles and shall cooperate in keeping the garbage area neat and clean. RESIDENT shall be responsible for disposing of items of such size and nature as are not normally acceptable by the garbage hauler.

RF';MFNT shall he recponcihle. for keeping the kitchen and bathroom drains free of think that may tend to ostuce clogging of the drains. RESIDENT shall pay for the cleaning out of any plumbing fixture that may need to be cleared of stoppage and for the expense or damage caused by stopping of waste pipes or overflow from bathtubs, wash basins, or sinks.

15. IIOUSE RULES: RESIDENT shall comply with all house rules as stated on separate addendum, but which are ducluCd pal t of tnlb rental VSl=m0nL, and a vidtutlun of any of the house I ics is cousidtacd a bmuch of this agreement.

16. CHANGE OF TERMS: The terms and conditions of this agreement are subject to future change by OWNER after the expiration of the agreed lease period upon 30-day written notice setting forth such change and delivered to T
nI"P ,T
F. iF., 1 r�nv chanNrs alr, suliiccl to laW\ Ill CAIStC11t C at 111C till le of flit: NUIIUC UI \ Irenri it Tel Ill`

8. I.,IQU1D FILLED FURNISHINGS: No liquid filled furniture, receptacle containing more than Ica gallons of liquid is permitted without prior written consent and meeting he requirements of the OWNER. RESIDENT also uglLes it, t:;uly inauuuu:e loaned allluuptiute 11v OWNER it)cnvel 11t1snible iva,t. iiutt nosy Ill cau.CJ Uy such ileula.

9. PARKING: When and if RESIDENT is assigned a parking area/space on OWNIR'S property, the parking nrealspace shall he used exclusively for parking of passenger automobiles and/or those approved vehicles listed on RESIDENT'S Application attached hereto. RESIDENT is hereby assigned or permitted to park only in the following ;ea or space Dr;vewins; street . Th.-parking fee ror this space (iI'applicabl: is i Said space shall not be used for the washing, painting, or repair ol'vehicics. No other parking space shall be used by RESIDENT or RESIDENTS guest(s). RESIDENT is responsible for oil leaks and other vehicle discharges for which RESIDENT shall be charged for cleaning if deemed necessary by OWNER. he
Ito N(11CF.: RFSinr-NT ngreec not to rslucr nr nllnw any nnice nr nrtivity con the nremicrc which mivht tiicnlrh m peace and quiet of another RESIDENT and/or neighbor. Said noise and/or activity shall be a breach of this agreement.

11. DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: If the premises become totally or partially destroyed during the term of this Agreement so that RESIDENTS use is seriously impaired, OWNER or RESIDENT may terminate this Agreement immediately upon three day written notice to the other.

12. CONDITION OF PREMISES: RESIDENT acknowledges that he has examined the premises and that said premises, all furnishings, fixtures, furniture, plumbing, ther items provided by OWNER are eating, electrical racilitics, alllcleantems lland in goodsted on the asaatisfactory property condition checklist, if any, and/or all o
condition except as may be indicated elsewhere in this Agreement. RESIDENT agrees to keep the preen portion of the items in good order and good condition and to immediately pay for costs to repair and/or replace any po above damaged by RESIDENT, his guests and/or invitees, except as provided by law. At the termination of this Agreement, all of above items in this provision sesshall be free of all tedio OWNER in persona p property and trash noand t belonging od to OcWN� It reasonable wear and tear and the preen
is agreed that all din, holes, tears, bums, and stains of any size or amount in the carpets, drapes, walls, fixtures, and/or ally Billet puts of ille 111cIllisCh, too Itllt t;011b"tata'cusullubic wCul wlU tcw-

13. ALTERATIONS: RESIDENT shall not paint, wallpaper, alter or redecorate, change or install locks, install antenna or other equipment, screws, fastening devices, large nails, or adhesive materials, place signs, displays, or other exhibits, on or in any portion of the premises without the written consent of the OWNER except as may be provided by law.
14: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE: RESIDENT shall deposit
all garbage and waste eli naREan and sanishah a manner
into the proper receptacles and shall cooperate in keeping garbage area responsible for disposing on ihle fnrf keepingthe. size natehen anature nd hathonm dras are not ine free of ly acceptable noc hAt many trend inlrniige
RFC1nF.NT chs111 he. , p for the cleaning out of any plumbing fixture that may need to be cleared clogging of the drains. RESIDENT shall pay of waste pipes or overflow from bathtubs, wash basins. of stoppage and for the expense or damage caused by stopping p Pe or sinks.

15. HOUSE RULES: RESIDENT shall comply with all houserules l s as ate a cepaivarerate addi u ondum,lbu which arc
t:a tillleti Null Of Lhis rclital agl=Mont, sotto a vWlallon O any Or agreement.

16. CHANGE OF TERMS: The terms and conditions of written notice setting forth such change and dereement are subject to future change by livered after the expiration of the agreed lease period upon 3t)-day RF11.II�F.IV 1 Any climpC- NIC \t Illic" 141 law" ill existolut: al ills 6111C of 111C IVt111cC 111 1.I11tI1V.0 �f TC11n\

17. TERMINA7 ION: Aller expiration of the leasing period, this agreement is autontaticully renewed from month to month, but may he terminated by either party giving to the other a 30•day written notice of intention to terminate Where Ia%r: require "lust cause". such just cause shall he so stated an said notice 'I he premises shall lit: considered vacated only alter all areas including storage areas are clear of ull RFSII )HN'I'S belongings, and keys and other property furnished lift USIDENT'S use are returned to OWNER. Should the RESIDENT hold over kyond the termination date or fail to vacate all possessions on or before the termination date, RESIDENT shall he liable for additional rent and damages which may include damages due to OWNIiR'S loss of prospective new renters

18. POSSESSION: if OWNER is unable to deliver possession of the residence to IZI . f.NTS on the agreed date, because of the loss or destruction of the residence or because of the failure of the prior residents to vacate or for any other reason. the RESIDENT and/or OWNER may immediately cancel and terminate this agreement upon written nonce to the other party at their last known address, whereupon neither party shall have liability to the other, and any sums paid under this Agreement shall be refunded in full. if neither party cancels, this Agreement shall he prorated and begin rnt the date of actual possession.

19. INSURANCE: RESIDENT acknowledges that OWNERS insurance does not cover personal property damage caused by fire, theft, rain, war, acts of God, acts of others, and/or any other causes, nor shall OWNER be held liable for such losses. RESIDENT is hereby advised to obtain his own insurance policy to cover any personal losses.

20. RIGHT OF E,,NTRY AND INSPECTION: OWNER may enter, inspect, and/or repair the premises at any time in case of emergency or suspected abandonment. OWNER shall give 24 hours advance notice and may enter for the purpose of showing the premises during normal business hours to prospective renters, buyers. lenders, for smoke alarm inspections, and/or for normal inspections and repairs. OWNER is permitted to make all alterations, repairs and maintenance that in OWNER'S judgment is necessary to perform.

21. ASSIGNMENT: RESIDENT agrees not to transfer, assign or sublet the premises or any part thereof.

22. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving any of the OWNER'S or RESIDENTS rights under the law. If any part of this Agreement shall be in conflict with the law, that part shall be void to the extent that It Is in conflict, but shall not invalidate this Agreement nor shall it affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

22. NO WAIR'ER: OW`NER'S acceptance of rent with knowledge of any default by RESIDENT or waiver by OWNER of any breach of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of subsequent breaches. Failure to require compliance or to exercise any right shall not be constituted as a waiver by OWNER of said term, condition, and/or right, and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement.

23. ATTORNEY FEES: If any legal action or proceedings be brought by either party of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed for all reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to other damages awarded.

24. JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY: The undersigned RESIDENTS are jointly and severally responsible and liable for all obligations under this agreement.

25. REPORT TO CREDIT/TENANT AGENCIES: You are hereby notified that a nonpayment, late payment or breach of any of the terms of this rental agreement may be submitted/reported to a credit and/or tenant reporting ilgellcy, and InSV create a Irevutive cledlt Iceold all yuul c►ed►t relmt.

26. LEAD NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: For rental dwellings built before 1978, RESIDENT acknowledges receipt of the following: (Please check)
Lead Based Paint Disclosure Form

27. ADDITIONS AND/OR EXCEP'11ONS

38. NOTICES: All UnINN
be served at RESIDEN-I'S premises and alI notices to OWNIiR shall be seined at New addres

29. INVENTORY: The premises contains the following items, that the RESIDENT may use.

Dishwasher, refrigerator. washertdryor solar heating,
30, KEYS AND ADDDENDUMS: RESIDENT acknowledges receipt of the following which shall he deurned part of this Agreement: (Please check)
-%C Keys Hof keys and purposes'Tjrlq_ —
_ House Rules _ Pet Agreement-__ Other-----

31. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between OWNER and RESIDENT-.

No oral agreements have been entered into, and all modifications or notices shall he in writing to be valid

32. RECEIPT OF AGREEMENT:1'he undersigned RESIDENTS have read and understand this Agreement and hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Rental Agreement.

RESIDENTS Signature
Datc0112612026
RESIDENTS Signature
Amon-
Date011i5a026
OWNER'S or Agent's Signature
Daleat/2612026

r

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 CONFIDENTIAL - FOR CLOSED SESSION ONLY
state as follows:

I . My legal name i l have firsthand knowledge of the
masers described herein, and if called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto.

2. I have been friends with Catherine "Cat" Moy for more than 34 years.

3. Cat has been a City Councilmember for the City of Fairfield since 2008 and was elected Mayor in 2022. She has lived her whole life in Fairfield and has deep roots in the City.

4. In February 2025, Cat and her husband Ken Moy sold their home o� -n the City of Fairfield. Cat shared with me that their plan was to use the sale proceeds to buy a 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 smaller home in Fairfield, perhaps a condominium with no regular yard upkeep.

5. In March 2025, 1 learned that Cat and Ken were unable to get a loan to buy a place in the City of Fairfield. I had just moved into afour-bedroom home on n Fairfield.

My adult daughter and nephew lived with me in the home, and we had plenty of space for another person.

6. So, I invited Cat to move in with me, and she accepted. She was a great housemate. The two of us shared primary household responsibilities, including cooking, grocery shopping, cleaning, taking out the trash, etc. We would grocery shop together at local stores. My daughter would assist with chores as well, but Cat and I were the primary caretakers of the household during the time Cat lived with me. Cat would conduct her day-to-day activities at my home when she was not at work. Cat brought some of her personal items and clothes, of course, to my home.

7. 1 knew Cat was going through financial issues and invited her to stay with me out of the kindness of my heart. Cat was bringing home less than S 1,400 a month working full-time as Fairfield's Mayor. She regularly worked weekends and nights, so she had no time to get another job.

She was fully committed to the citizens of Fairfield. I had no expectations that she would pay rent and I told her she was welcome to stay with me as long as she needed to. Cat told me she hoped to have her own permanent home in Fairfield shortly.

8. Cat and I are close friends and support each other, in good times and bad. Cat always helps others, putting herself last. When the City of Fairfield laid me off, I lost my house, my

STATEMENT

2 3I
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Il
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 car, my retirement, and almost my sanity. Cat invited me to live with her, at no charge. When my grandson passed away suddenly. Cat spoke with the hospital, cleaned my house, and held me until I fell asleep. She was by my side through the entire nightmare. After she sold her house, I knew Cat was in need. And I was happy to support her as she supported me. l would never ask her to pay rent for putting a roof over her head while she worked to get back on her feet, especially when I had the space for her in my home and she had done the same for me. Cat contributed to my home in plenty of other ways during the time we lived together.

9. Cat later moved out of my home to live with her daughter at her apartment on - in Fairfield, at the end of June or beginning of July 2025.

Executed this 22nd day of April, 2026, at Fairfield, California.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII VW
d

STATEMENT T

I CONFIDENTIAL - FOR CLOSED SESSION ONLY
2 tate as follows:
3 1. My legal name I have firsthand knowledge of the matters 4 described herein, and if called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto. 5 2. 1 have known Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy for 13 years. 6 3. 1 have lived in the City of Fairfield with my husband at our home a 7 until April 2026.
8 4. On January 13, 2026. my husband and 1 purchased a property in the 9 unincorporated area of Fairfield, which we intended to move into in March 2026. 10 5. 1 first met Cat when I asked for help as a resident of Fairfield. She was a 11 Fairfield Councilwoman at the time. She was the only councilmember to return my calls. She helped 12 my family and me address several issues, including safety concerns regarding registered sex offenders 13 living near our schools. Early in 2025,1 was again looking for help. I had information that a rescue 14 organization was killing animals it was supposed to be saving. I asked Councilman Doug Carr for 15 help, and he directed me to Mayor Moy. I contacted her and we met at City Hall. A usual, Fairfield and 16 helpful and professional. I told her that I was starting a new wildlife rescue nonprofit 17 she was excited, saying she wanted to help. When the State came to my home to interview me and 18 inspect the premises, Cat was there the entire time. She spoke with the State and told them the City 19 would benefit from having the only licensed wildlife rescue in Solano County. The State gave couldthe
we
20 license. Immediately, my husbandMand I began looking for a country property so ave
21 plenty of space for the animals. Cat asked me then if I would be renting out my home when we bought 22 a new place. I said we probably would. I told her she would get first shot at renting ourm 23 house.
24 6. Cat told me that, at the time, she had been living at her daughter's apartment in 25 Fairfield, while her husband was staying in Suisun Valley in a small office space on their rental 26 property. I was aware that Cat and Ken had been looking for a place to live permanently in the CitY had
Cat
27 Fairfield for nearly a year, but they were unable to find a place they could afford to purchase. 28 stayed with friends and family in Fairfield, Cat told me that because her daughter was planning I

STATEMENT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Il
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
2C
to move out of Fairfield, she needed to move out of her daughter's apartment too. I was aware that Ken had not worked for a long time due to a disabling medical condition, and that Cat and Ken suffered financial issues. Cat said she only makes S7 or $8 per hour as a full-time Mayor.

7. 1 decided to rent the property to Cat and Ken because I promised to give them the first opportunity. As part of living there, they agreed to work with me caring for our rescue animals at th ouse where we are licensed to hold rescue animals. Both Cat and Ken were raised around animals in the country and know how to handle them. They didn't mind that we would be in and out of the property at different hours. It was perfect for all of us. On January 15, 2026, Cat signed a lease to rent my Fairfield property with a starting date of February 1, 2026. See 21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Exhibit A.

8. My husband and I began to gather our belongings and move out of our Fairfield home. Tragically, on January 22, 2026, a tractor crushed my husband days before Cat and Ken were scheduled to move in. Our priority immediately shifted to my husband's health. He had multiple surgeries and was in ICU. This delayed our move out from the Fairfield home while he recovered from the accident. Cat kindly offered to temporarily stay elsewhere while we gave my husband time to recover and time for me to finalize our move out. She and Ken offered to clean the house, do yardwork, help the animals, and drive our daughters to activities, as my husband fought for his life.

Doctors didn't know if he would ever walk again.

9. As I write this, my husband is trying to heal from yet another surgery on his foot. Both feet were crushed in the accident. We have moved into our new house on - We are happy to be in our new home, but some of our things still remain a Cat
and Ken have been so understanding. She said that health comes first and she's had health issues that changed life plans before too. Cat is an amazing person and a great leader for Fairfield. We are so happy to have her as a tenant and a caretaker of some of our rescued animals. Cat and Ken were given the keys to the Fairfield property on April 9th and began moving in that day. My husband still can't help much physically, so my daughters and I are still struggling to get everything out o� Cat and Ken continue to be patient and understanding of our needs and limitations given the circumstances.

STATEMENT OF

I Executed this 22nd day of April, 2026, at Fairf
2 3
4 i
6 7
8 y
14 li
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
26 27
�8
3 STATEMENT OF AMY PEDRIOIJ

IEAHI1 I:i. A

LEASE
OR Rra>tar:`TIl\L, LF:ASF:
d conditions under which the
Parties +
_ shall be
This Rental Agreement or Itesidential Lease shall evidence the crnnpi • ' shall be referred to as �unl,
whose signatures appeal below have ago d. !.a Catherine MoyrtA6' t- sc to RESIDENT and RESIDENT referred It, as " 0WNiiit and Tenantls) I. �recmcnt, OWNER agrtx4 premises located at "RFSIDGN"f " As consideration for this ab Private residence, the p reni'ease trom OWNER for use solely as a P in the city of Fairfield _ — ---- _— - advance2,00o r month on the 151 _ day of each month. This

1. TF;RMS: RESIDENT agrec�anuto aa}tstl and continue'. (ch ck one) a,;rcemcnt shall commence on `� fable for all rent due until such time •C1LtiCIlUll1. I IICICafICI It 51lSll 11CCU111C a 111Unlll-lt�IlUntll tenancy. ii FcESiuEi"T'iluui _ 'Lsd 1 P period he shall be nod,
t� Ul►ltl __ _ _ --
move ftom the premises pour to the ex iration of this time y Residence is occupied by an OWNI�R approved paying RESIDfiN'1' and/or expiration of said time pe that the Res agreement by
whichever is shorter. shall terminate this
on a month to -month tenancy until tithe Apart' 'Crr.-i �atiOn.

B. until ---'. . 1,...., 10 da s riar is he ,,.c
bicin g a wrtten r,� .ce of.ntent.cn c Wrr.:ina.c a. .�, ' `" the owner as follows id at such place or method dcsilmated by the
and cash shall

2. PAVOENTS: Rent and/or other charges are by ymcnts are to be made by check and a Security Deposit of
for a total naymt'nt of
be acceptable. OWNER acknowledges receipt of the First Month's rent of S�— r, Zero, anr1 arirlitinnal rhart�ee,'fi'e�e for Nable t S—"r— All payments arc to be made paY
sits shall secure compliance with the terms and conditions of days after the premises have been complete)}'

3. SECURITY DEPOSITS: The total of the above deposits
this agreement and shall be refunded to RESIDENT within NIA } Wear and tear, and e> any other amount necessan' to Pay OWNER; a) any unpaid rent, ba cleaning costs. c 1 key replacement costs. 1 vacated less am• amount resented to
cost for repair of damages to Premises andr'Te common areas above or m ry d charges
legally allowable under the terms of this agr Bement. sits o not coen wer such costunting of s and damages the RESIDENT shall RESIDENT wahs ld additional costs foays of r damagesut. if OWNER. immediately pay
so (not to exceed _ °'a of the monthly rent), shall be added and aid Cent ny

4. LATE CHARGE: A late fee 51?____=— of the mon(h. Any dishonored check shall be treated as tarp payment of rent made after the
and subject to an additional fee of SteNIA. — c of the premises except

5. UTILITIES: RESIDENT agrees to pay all utilities and/or services based upon occupany Water; PGE,
sta in over 15 days without the written consent of OWNER shall be considered subject breach

6.00CUPAI\TS: Guests) Y g
expressed written consent of OWNER obtained in advance
residence for more than 15 days unless the f this agreement ONLY the following individuals and/or animals, AND NO OTHERS shalloccupy o g Ken and Catherine MY
t of any kind shall be kept on or about the Premises, Such conse►f amount

7. PETS: No animal, fowl `fish, oPwrittendconse t and meeting the requirements of the OWNS of time, without obtaining p giving a 30 day tmtten notice. in the event laws are passed or NIA
granted, shall be revocable at OWNER'S option upon g kind, an additional deposit in the amount of c PP_--- pt permission is granted to have a pet and/or animal of any nua alnnv with the. uonim� of CIWNFR a ro ate by OWNER to cover possible l,andity and
chill he rmoired alnno with arirlitinnal mnnthliv retance deemed PP Pn Agreement. RESIDENT also agrees to carry
damages that may be caused by such animals.

i

8. LIQUID FILLED FURNISHINGS: No liquid filled furniture, receptacle containing more than ten gallons of i
liquid is permitted without prior written consent and meeting the requirements of the OWNER. RESIDENT also ugitxa ill cat I iltaulunce deckled ulllllulniaic ily OWNER it) cuvel I)tJ- - I lc iu„e, illat clay In: caused by Sued iichla.

9. PARKING: When and if RESIDENT is assigned a parking area/space on OWNER'S property, the parking area/space shall be used exclusively for parking of passenger automobiles and lr those approved vehicles listed on
RESIDENT'S Application attached hereto. RESIDENT' is hereby assigned or permitted to park only n ly in theollo wing
area or space C"v"I'; !"el . The parking 1'ec for this: space (if applicable is S y Said space shall not be used for the washing, painting, or repair ofvchicics. No other parking space shall be used by SIDENT of RESIDENTS guest(s). RESIDENT is responsible for oil leaks and other vehicle discharges for which RESIDENT shall be charged for cleaning if deemed necessary by OWNER.

I(1 N(11CF.: RFCIIIFN'T a�reec not to raker or nllow any nnke or activity on the premicec which mioht dirmrh the peace and quiet of another RESIDENT and/or neighbor. Said noise and/or activity shall be a breach of this alrccmcnt

11. DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: If the premises become totally or partially destroyed during the term of this i Agreement so that RESIDENTS use is seriously impaired, OWNER or RESIDENT may terminate this Agreement immediately' upon three day written notice to the other.

12. CONDITION OF PREMISES: RESIDENT acknowledges that he has examined the premises and that said premises, all furnishings, fixtures, furniture, plumbing, heating, electrical facilities, all items listed on the attached property condition checklist, if any, and/or all other items provided by OWNER are all clean, and in good satisfactory condition except as may be indicated elsewhere in this Agreement. RESIDENT agrees to keep the premises and all items in good order and good condition and to immediately pay for costs to repair and/or replace any portion of the above damaged by RESIDENT, his guests and/or invitees, exceptas provided by law. At the termination of this I Agreement, all of above items in this provision shall be returned to OWNER in clean and good condition except for reasonable wear and tear and the premises shall be free of all personal property and trash not belonging to OWNER. It is agreed that all dirt, holes, tears, burns, and stains of any size or amount in the carpets, drapes, walls, fixtures, and/or ally ulliel Pali ul die plelllllel, do Ilui culibilitlie leasultabic Weal and ieal.

13. ALTERATIONS: RESIDENT shall not paint, wallpaper, alter or redecorate, change or install locks, install antenna or other equipment, screws, fastening devices, large nails, or adhesive materials, place signs, displays, or other exhibits, on or in any portion of the premises without the written consent of the OWNER except as may be prc': idcd by la::'.
14: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE: RESIDENT shall deposit all garbage and waste in a clean and sanitary manner into the proper receptacles and shall cooperate in keeping the garbage area neat and clean. RESIDENT shall be responsible for disposing of items of such size and nature as are not normally acceptable by the garbage hauler.

RFSIDFNT shall he recticlncihle fnr keeping the kitchen and hwhrnnm drains free of thinac that may tend to ranee for the cleaning out of any plumbing fixture that may need to be cleared clogging of the drains. RESIDENT shall pay
of stoppage and for the expense or damage caused by stopping of waste pipes or overflow from bathtubs, wash basins, or sinks.

15. HOUSE RULES: RESIDENT shall comply with all house rules as stated on separate addendum, but which are jitzillcU pat of this rental agreemClit, and a violation of any of the houbc iuiCS iJ culisidweu a breach of iltl." agreement.

16. CHANGE OF TERMS: The terms and conditions of this agreement are subject to future change by OWNER after the expiration of the agreed lease period upon 30-day written notice setting forth such change and delivered to riF.iliir i I NtIV C11QI14iC, a1C,IlI11Cl ill IaW� 111 CXI\ICIICC ai ille'title 01 111e Ntlilce q1 t 1111we l 11 1 etM% i

I T TERMINATION: Aller expiration of the leasing period, this agreement is automatically renewed from month to month, but may he; terminated by either party giving to the other a 30-day written notice of intention to terminate Where laws require "just cause", such just cause shall he so stated on said notice. The premises shall be considered vacated only after all areas including storage areas are clear of all RESIDENT'S belongings, and keys and other property furnished for RESIDENTS use are returned to OWNER. Should the RESIDENT hold over beyond the termination date or fail to vacate all possessions on or before the termination date, RESIDENT shall be liable for additional rent and damages which may include damages due to OWNFIR'S loss of prospective new renters.

18. POSSESSION: If OWNER is unable to deliver possession of the residence to RFSIDENTS on the agreed date, because of the loss or destruction of the residence or because of the failure of the prior residents to vacate or for any other reason, the RESIDENT and/or OWNER may immediately cancel and terminate this agreement upon written notice to the other party at their last known address, whereupon neither party shall have liability to the other, and any sums paid under this Agreement shall be refunded in full. If neither party cancels, this Agreement shall be prorated and begin on the: date of actual possession.

19. INSURANCE: RESIDENT acknowledges that OWNERS insurance does not cover personal property damage caused by fire, theft, rain, war, acts of God, acts of others, and/or any other causes, nor shall OWNER be held liable for such losses. RESIDENT is hereby advised to obtain his own insurance policy to cover any personal losses.

20. RIGHT OF ENTRY AND INSPECTION: OWNER may enter, inspect, and/or repair the premises at any time in case of emergency or suspected abandonment. OWNER shall give 24 hours advance notice and may enter for the purpose of showing the premises during normal business hours to prospective renters, buyers, lenders, for smoke alarm inspections, and/or for normal inspections and repairs. OWNER is permitted to make all alterations, repairs and maintenance that in OWNER'S judgment is necessary to perform.

21. ASSIGNMENT: RESIDENT agrees not to transfer, assignor sublet the premises or any part thereof.

22. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving any of the OWNER'S or RESIDENTS rights under the law. If any part of this Agreement shall be in conflict with the law, that part shall be void to the extent that it is in conflict, but shall not invalidate this Agreement nor shall it affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

22. NO WAIVER: OWNER'S acceptance of rent with knowledge of any default by RESIDENT or waiver by OWNER of any breach of any tern of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of subsequent breaches. Failure to require compliance or to exercise any right shall not be constituted as a waiver by OWNER of said term, condition, and/or right, and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement.

23. ATTORNEY FEES: If any legal action or proceedings be brought by either party of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed for all reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to other damages awarded.

24. JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. The undersigned RESIDENTS are jointly and severally responsible and liable for all obligations under this agreement.

25. REPORT TO CREDff/TENANT AGENCIES: You are hereby notified that a nonpayment, late payment or breach of any of the terms of this rental agreement may be submitted/reported to a credit and/or tenant reporting agency, and lllav c1-cuic a Ilegative Credit Iecoid oil you[ ctedlt report.

26. LEAD NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: For rental dwellings built before 1978, RESIDENT acknowledges receipt of the following: (Please check)
Lead Based Paint Disclosure Form
EDA Parnphllet

27. ADDITIONS AND/OR FXCF.P'1'I()NS
` :� )I :N'I' shrill he served at RLSIDI N,rs premises and all nruces to OWNER shall

28. NOTICES: All notices it) LI., I( --
be served at stew address , -- —

29. INVENTORY: The premises contains the following items, that the RLSID.V N I' ma)' use.

D,shw_ esher, refrigerator, wasmadryer voterheatingJ_ --- — • • �VD ADDDENDIiMS: RGSIDGN'I' acknawlecigs receipt of - the following which shall be deemed Pan of

30. KEYS .�.
this Agreement: (Please check)
�C heys aof keys and purposcs� .10_Ss.— —
House Rules_ Pet Agrixtnent _other
:�GREENENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between OWNER and RESIDENT.

31. ENTIRE
No oral aerecil�en�e have been entered into, and all modifications or notices shall be in writing to be valid 3AGREEMENT- undersigned RES

2. RECEIPT OF Dn
hereby acknowledNTS have read and understand this Agreement and ge receipt of a copy of this Rental A
RESIDENTS Signature
Date at12&2o26
RESIDENTS Signature
L--IMM
Date 01115202-6
OWNER'S or Agent's Signature
Date0112612026

Exhibit G

On April 1, 2026, Elizabeth Lai and Gary Winuk gathered the following information:
initiatedrtment compl x locate
Ield, CafliornWi;s weentere
ur vehicle proceeded to enter the apa men comp ex.

An unoccupied blue sedan (California license plat as parked in parking stall #12 located on the side of the apartment complex.

Approximately 0842 hours: Winuk and Lai walked through th_apartment complex.

The windows of Apartment ■were open, a fan was running inside, and a cat bed was visible through the window.

Approximately 0903 hours: Surveillance initiated infield, California 94534. An unoccupied white r < lifornia lice a black Cadillac SUV (California license plat re I y.

Approximately 0907 hours: Surveillance initiated at Fairfield, California 94534. A tan Chevrolet Suburban (California license plat as located on the property. An unidentified female was located in the front passenger seat of the vehicle preparing to leave the residence. The unidentified female exited her vehicle and approached the driver side of Winuk's vehicle where she was identified as Fairfield Mayor Catherine Moy.

Winuk and Moy exchanged morning greetings and Winuk introduced Moy to Lai. Moy stated that Winuk and Lai were on private property and needed to vacate the premises. Moy informed Winuk that she had retained legal counsel and that her counsel would be in contact with Winuk.

Moy further stated, "I'm here, as I'm here every morning." Winuk and Lai left the premises.

Approximately 0930 hours: Surveillance initiated (or drove past at Fairfield, California 94534AM"
te male was walking his dog on the side of the
property walking towards Fairfield, California 94534.

A atel 0942 hours: Surveillance initiated a partment complex located am Fairfield, California 945 3. As we entered
apartments the metal gate opened and our vehicle proceeded to enter the apartment complex.

Parking stall #12 was vacant.

Approximately 0945-1004 hours: Lai knocked oraepartment # Wice with n answer. The window was open and the fan was still on. Lai proceeded to apartim d knocked on the door twice. There was no answer. Lai then walked to apartment nd knocked on the door. An unidentified male peeked out the blind and said "hello". Lai requested the unidentified male to come to the door and continued to knock on the door. No one answered the door.

Approximately 1015-1120 hours: Surveillance initiated Paiie Fairfield, California 94534. Lai knocked on the door o 534 and
interviewe please see audio recording/transcription). Lai proceeded to knock on the door o Fairfield, Cal4ornia 94534 a*au
viewed s r
lease see audio recording/transcription). Lai knocked on Fairfield, California 94534 and interviewed (please se
recording/transcription). �.

Approximatel 1257 hours: Surveillance initiated atWornia apgrtment complex located at
ApartmenEwairfield, Ca i45h. Paring stall #12 was
vacant. As Lai entere partments a resident held open the door for Lai to enter. Lai walked to the managers office and interviewed manap lea§e Te audio recording/transcription). ;
`Please note that Lai showed ma'photo of Fairfield Mayor Cathe ine Moy"(photo was from the City of Fairfield website) and tated that she had never seen Moy before. t
,s

Exhibit H

4 1W Jo
Yes I*ey
11dyo&
• ••..., — I —L rnVMQiFS. THE PARTY AGREES AS FOLLOWS
I oe.notisduc—.h
nt ren�ts fro Owner for residem use only, the p-emiscs known ss te I v day of each and even month, at S �
per month hegmnmg on the _Lday of
/ — ANY RENT PiWnON OF RENi RECEIVED after the 9 00am on the am day OC nett) m whjCh it is due (including holidays and weekends) wilt be subject to a tale charge of 10% 1 Ten �iercrnt) s_�erC2 ew
NO PERSONAL CHECKS will be accepted after the I Sib of me month A l pa menu after the 15th must be Cashiers check or money order No two- 0) party cheeks accepted without pnur approval A S35.00 sernce Charge will be due on any check returned b% the bank If rwo checks are returned in anv one-year VIennd Me Resident's personal check will nt, longer be accepted and rent must be paid bs money order ur cashiers check

3. Resident will 1+c charged $35 00 if a 3-DAY NOTICE is issued for am reason. The late charge pernod isNUT A grace perial and a 3-DAY NOTICE may be issued any time after the 2nd day of the month in which am portion of the rent is due and unpaid
in the event the Resident locks themselves out or looses their keys there will be a $25.00 charge for reentry %cmtce by:his office anyl,me other than normal business hours are Monda. through Friday, 9•.am to 5'00pm.

CHARGE TO RESIDENT: An* charge billed to the Resident, i e . sewer clean out, trash hauling, unpaid sewer or garbage bills, damage late or 3-day notices, are due on the I st of the tollo-,� mg month. All work Performed and driving time µill be billed at $65.00 per man hour with a one hour minimum Administration fees m the amount of S65.00 per hour may be charged for processing all 3-day notices• going to the courthouse for processmg defaults as well as appearances in court. This fee will apply to any and all administration fees deemed necessary to assure tenants are in compliance with this rental agreement.

All charges will be deducted from the nex! payment made b•- Resident Rent twill m credited onh after all other charges have been paid. Any char es incurred bw the resident left unpaid will be conslderod additional rent due,
A. Except as prohibited b} law, this agreement may be temmnated bq either pan. after services upon the ot^et of a written 30 day nonce of termination of tenancy. Any holding over thereafter shall resuh in resident being liable to Owner for -rental damage" at the fair rental value which will be the daily rate based in the current rent at Lire time of the holdover.

S Premises shall be occupied ONLY the following persons. more rhap. 15 consecutive days ,,t Ahout the written consent Of Owner shall be greeaient b; Resident.

i
�e
0cr ytc
f using

NOTI OF CHANGES OF TERMS OF TENANCY
TO: and all others in possessions of the premises
commonly know as California.

You are hereby notified, in accordance With Civil Code Section 827 , that _9_ days after service upon you of this notice, or JljN 01. 2018 , whichever is later; your tenancy of the above - designated premises will be changed as fallow:

1. The monthly rent which is payable in advance on or before the first day of each month will be the sum of S 1,500 instead of S 1, 375 the cti rent monthly rent.

2. Other Changes:
1AL1
rplease note that your rent is not been increase more the 10% or the_l0 % therpfgre is no oar
You manda_ t�____ �n to provide residents 6N ith t 30 day Notice Of Chanae Of "TerOf Tenancy ms
� s� —
eY,
Yo; Except as herein prodded, all other terms of your tenancy shall remain in full force and effect. 1 As required by law, you are hereby notified that a negative credit report reflecting on your credit report may be submittecbto 4 credit reportirta agency if you fail to fulfill the terms of your credit

Exhibit

On April 10, 2026, Elizabeth Lai and Gary Winuk gathered the following information:

Approximately 0624 hours: Surveillance initiated atFairfield, California 94634. A white truck was located In front of the property.

Approximately 0633 hours: A tan Chevrolet Suburban was located in the back of AWFairfield, California 94334 (see attached photo),
Approxima i 0644-09 3 hours: Surveillance initiated atmpartment complex located at !"airfield, California 94533. A tan suburban nor Fairfield Mayor Catherine Moy were seen entering or exiting apartrnents.

Exhibit J

Gary S. Winuk
Attorney
...............................................

Kaufman Legal Group, APC
428 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
213.452.6568
Cell 916-996-5455
[email protected]
From: Quentin Barbosa
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2026 1:24 PM
To: Gary Scott Winuk
Cc: Kristen Rogers
Subject: RE: [EXTERNALJ:RE: Mayor Catherine Moy
Hi Gary,
Thank you for sharing the materials the Mayor produced prior to our engagement.

Please find responses to your questions regarding the Berry Drive property below.

At the outset, however, we note that Mayor Moy has endeavored to fully cooperate with this investigation, even as it has taken a serious toll on her and her family. This investigation is not a good faith use of public funds. Not only is this inquiry timed to inflict maximum harm on her ongoing campaign for County Supervisor (the primary election is only about a month away), it is consuming limited public resources to potentially override the expressed will of the people of Fairfield who elected her -- with only a few months left in her term.

The facts here cannot support a finding that Mayor Moy at any point ceased to be domiciled in Fairfield. Consistent with state law, the Attorney General has denied quo warranto on questions of residency even when officials must temporarily stay outside of their jurisdiction, so long as they have an intent to remain. See, e.g., Gov't Code § 244 (domicile "can be changed only by the union of act and intent"); DeMiglio v. Mashore. 4 Cal. App. 4th 1260, 1268 (1992) (explaining "our courts have held that two elements are indispensable to accomplishing a change of domicile: actual residence in the new locality plus the intent to remain there").

In 2018. the Attorney General denied a quo warranto action against a Costa Mesa Citv Councilmember. 101 ODs. Cal. Attv. Gen. 42 (2018). It was undisouted that the

Councilmember had moved out of Costa Mesa to his in-laws' home in Newport Beach for a few months in 2017. But the official never intended to give up his domicile in Costa Mesa; he actively looked for a new place to rent in Costa Mesa and ultimately obtained a Costa Mesa apartment. The Attorney General concluded that "temporarily staying with relatives for a few months while making efforts to secure permanent housing" was not sufficient to have changed the official's domicile. Id. The Attorney General also explained there was "no evidence he intended to remain in Newport Beach any longer than it took to acquire a new Costa Mesa domicile." Id. Similarly, Mayor Moy has explained she contacted brokers and viewed listings with her husband in the City of Fairfield, that she was unable to o
qualify for a new loan, and ultimately had to live with friends and eld until she was able to find a place to live in the City of Fairfield: th property. There is no question that Mayor Moy has always been domici ed in Fairfield. Indeed, Mayor Moy signed her new lease prior to your investigation.

Accordingly, her actions and her words establish that her domicile had always remained Fairfield, just as in the Costa Mesa case.

In 1989, the Attorney General denied quo warranto against a Lancaster City Councilmember. 72 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 63, 63 (1989). In that case, the official moved his family and his furniture in February 1988 to a home he purchased outside of the jurisdiction in Palmdale. The next month, he rented an apartment in Lancaster and publicly stated that he intended to maintain "dual residences." The official was a sales representative for the Palmdale development; he purchased the Palmdale house solely as an investment and moved there to be present while improvements were being made. He moved a portion of his possessions into the Lancaster apartment, which he shared with his daughter, before moving temporarily to the Palmdale house. He had discussed the matter with the city manager, the city attorney, his son-in-law (an attorney), his fellow council members, and the League of California Cities, all of whom agreed that he could temporarily move to the Palmdale house without giving up his domicile in Lancaster. His voting residency remained in Lancaster during this period, though his car registration and his wife's voter registration were briefly switched to the Palmdale house. Id. at 64, 71.

Finally, in December 1988, while the Attorney General was considering the quo warranto request, the official stated he had sold the Palmdale house and moved into a newly purchased Lancaster home, ending his dual residency. The Attorney General concluded that these facts amounted to "very strong direct evidence" of his intent to keep his domicile in Lancaster. Id. at 71. The Attorney General also stated suing the official would not be in the public interest. The official's sale of the Palmdale property and his "complete return" to Lancaster made a successful prosecution "extremely doubtful," as it effectively rendered the issue moot. Id. The facts here are even more in favor of Mayor Moy. Unlike the official in the Lancaster case, Mayor Moy has never entertained the prospect of a dual residency. She never expressed her intent to move her domicile to Suisun Valley or anywhere other than Fairfield.

Again, Mayor Moy requests a fair analysis in the report that references these rulings. There is no basis for effectively voiding the voters' will that she serve as

tneir mayor.

1. May I please have a copy of the lease for the property without signatures redacted. I will redact them again w en presenting to any other party in the future.

The signatures were redacted on the basis of personal privacy and are r,�j,(equired for the investigation. The names of the primary parties (Mayor Moy an he owner) are included in the lease. The signatures provide no additional in orma ion or insight that is not already
n aid ibody of the document. We will
not be providing an unredacted version oflease.
the

2. May I please have acomplete
fmodelvehicle
, yearscoloreandyl tense pate
and her husband, along with make
number.

This is a cumbersome and invasive ask when the Mayor and her husband are already strained and overwhelmed with �hoisinvestigation. 1The Mayor is concerned ned the rmation is
invasive and does not speak to Mayo y
release of the list of information of all vehicles and identifying information regarding these vehicles will jeopardize the safety of her family, particularly because individuals have trespassed on her property and at her daughter's apartment during the Council's investigation.

3. May I please have a copy of proof that the utilities that the Mayor is now required to pay per the lease are now in her name.

Presently, the Mayor only has garbage service in her name. Please find attached documentation to that effect.
4*Ma lease have a copy of the first rent check paid by the Mayor to Ms. pecifically I would like the check as processed by the bank — should be available online in a checking account,
not yet cashed th eck Mayor Moy provided to
The landlordces not wish to cash the
her. Mayor oy as Was
of the home, but Ms.
check until she and her husband have completely move out their belongings.

5. Can the Mayor please identify, per her declaration. any specific nights she recalls staying at the Suisun Valley property since January 1, 2026? The Mayor cannot recall specific dates she spent at the Suisun Valley property.

Accordingly, the statement of Mayor Moy did not include the specific dates since she cannot attest to exactly whaadatenoVh�gstoa�ed�e can onWith ly recallstress
the general
close of the sale of her property time at another property does time frames. Moreover, the fact that Mayor Moy spent
not reflect a change in her domicile; a she
naP explained trPma°n StaeP Ila Fairfield
Pieldrhas
alwav� i1PP.n hPr hnmP anrf it i.

prohibit officials from owning multiple properties and thatit is them; ochange aay it
expressly contemplates this possibility and specifies that c person's domicile unless intent changes too. See. e.g., Elec. Law § 349 ().

Please also refer to the AG opinions cited above, which show that to porainy staying outside the jurisdiction paired with actions displaying intent domiciled within the jurisdiction does not effect a change in domicile and is not a basis for removing an elected official from office.

6. Please let me know if the Mayor has notified the City of her change of address and if she has changed her voter registration information with the County. If she has changed her voter registration information, could she please (as she did during the first stage of this inquiry) authorize the County Registrar to confirm the change with me. Per the last time we did this, an email to the Registrar granting authorization to release the information to me will suffice.
hould now
Yes, Mayor Moy h tified the City of her address change, which updated with reflect she lives at Her new address at a
the Registrar of Voters.

7. ase let me know if the Mayor has acquired property insurance for the 6roperty, per paragraph 9 of the Lease agreement.

Mayor Moy has acquired property insurance for the full year. Please see attached.

8. Would this Wednesda morning, April 29th be convenient for the site visit at the ome? First thing in the morning around 9 or so would be apprecia a accommodate my schedule.

The landlord . is in the rocess of moving her licensed animal rescue facility from the property a to her new home. Accordingly, she is not sition of
comfortable with the walkthrough unti her move
out
tand the
traing the an malsr animal
rescue to her new home is completed, so as to avoid
maintain the privacy of her husband while recoverass(tt e just perty isad easierto surgery on Monday and is also spending time a as she completes their access than his new home), and protect her own privacy
moveout with her daughters. Mayo�Mo re*as
at she made comfortab comfortable
it. kThorprotect
offer to you before confirming thathas to
her person ofessional relations ip er landlord, Mayor Moy respect Mswishes.

Please let us know if you have any further questions we can answer on behalf of the Mayor.

Quentin Barbosa
Associate
Olson ReMChOLLP

Exhibit K

CCR 0 REPUBLIC
1V SERVICES
4/21/2026
Case:

Dear Catherine Moy,
Below is a summary of your purchased services. If you ever need additional services, or just need an extra pickup, please give us a call back @1-844-REPUBLIC. Thanks for your business.

Product
MSW - Solid Waste 65 Gallon
RCY - Recycling 35 Gallon
YW - Yard Waste 65 Gallon
Fuel
Environmental {°k;
Admin
Estimated Tax Total (%)
r--
Estimated Invoice (Total)
Rate per Billing
one Time Delivery
Service Frequency
Removal Fee Quantity
Cycle
Fee
1/WEEK
$69.0D

50.00 s0.co 1
1IWEEK

50.00 50.00
$0.00
1/WEEK
$0.00
S0.00
4Z0.0o 1
s0 00 (0.00%)
S0 00

50.00 569.00
$0.00
Next steps for Residential Customers
A $50.00 prepayment may be required to start services. This will be applied to your first invoice.

Next steps for Business Customers
After the quote is reviewed and accepted, an electronic Customer Service Agreement (eCSA) will be sent to your email for signature. Once the eCSA is signed, a delivery of the container(s) can be scheduled. If you have any questions, please contact me by replying to the email or calling the phone number listed on the Sales Proposal email. We look forward to hearing from you soon! Sincerely,
Elizabeth Noria Alvarado
The Total Estimated Amount is merely an estimate or your typical monthly invoice amount without one-time start-up charges (e,g., delivery). It may not include any applicable taxes or local fees, which would be additional charges on your,nvoice."FRF, ERF &

Admin: The Fuel Recovery Foe (FRF} is a variable charge that changes monthly. For more Informallon on the FRF, Environmental Recovery Fee (ERF) and Administrative Fee, please visit ilia links available on the 13111 fay page of ourwobslle, www.republiraervices.com . The proposed rates above are valid for 30 days. This proposal is not a contract or agreement or on offer to enter Into a contractor agreement. The purpose of this proposal is to set forth the proposed framework of service offerings and rate and fees for those offerings. Any transaction based upon this proposal is subject to and conditioned upon the execution by both parties of Republic Services` Customer Service Agreement.

Exhibit L

i
i
r
U1
Q
U
2 'o
-
a
-�
.W
Ll
M
0 c
C
%
Y
4 Or
LL
y
y
-
4 v
a
o
�
W

Exhibit M

4:56 11 5G
propertyservice.geico.com
Billing
This policy is paid in full
Total Premium $171.58
Remaining Balance $0.00
Auto Pay Status Enrolled
Previous Payment $171.58 on 04/24/2026
Stored Payment Mastercard ending in

MAKE PAYMENT

UPDATE BILLING

4:57 11 5G
propertyservice.geico.com
Named Insured 0 DOB:

CATHERINE MOY
Secondary Insured(s)
Interested Parties
Contact I nfo
Email
Phone Number
catmoy��
Home

EDIT EMAIL & PHONE
Property Address
Mailing Address
airfield
CA 94534
View & Edit
airfield
CA 94534
View & Edit

xhi
Ebit N

.1

1 bOpt
- - - —:=.- _.ten.••,..-.. �: '�.
i to►
' �`3„ ,l � 'd?' `ems � •e+
t

�,�,
. r
•� � d �
t�1 �� � � � Y v" �
i ,� ' <<
i
,` 'r
�' � • � /
1 � .. i
•, ��I � t"
� ,� �
•,
., _
• ,� {. � ..
{ .` � _
.�
r �
.i � , � '
C^ � �
� �:
� � �., '.
� �
. � �
"iry c.; �
� � li4
• �. .%»'
r� F��
—_ � �.�•
./-
- , � ■
• �� 14 :"
. ��
�.��� ..
7[

'CIS

1. - � / �1' -

Exhibit O

On April 28, 2026, Elizabeth Lai and Gary Winuk gathered the following information:

Approximately 0616 hours: Surveillance initiated at , Fairfield, California 94534. No vehicles were located at the residence (see attached photos).

Approximately 0630 hours: Surveillance initiated at" Fairfield, California 9453. A tan Chevrolet Suburban was located In the back of the residence (see attached photos).

74 T,
I

• --•tom r`�:,
Aw
y ^ ,7 n /
AL
LY +• 'ram• � :. �.6 t �114�:Att-' •. � c ..� ., •'�y�•�.. ple
I • ` 1 � N � . i
a�"'1�� li''. �- G C.'� • mid. y ; t i L lr,� VA
i ,(i..�►v ,. � r. ,�� ��,, ..li' .;�►� ra•� ti �,�,,_ .- � ' i `mil (( s� tiT. •vim a�.+••�'� •' y�.
t: 411.kw. LJs
;,!ti`�` ,,��, t' -i t�L''t �s�t� ti\ �' '•jai' •�•'`�l•'�.

Agenda Item No: D.2
I//r
Oit
F

AGENDA REPORT
DATE: June 9, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for Reimbursement by Mayor Moy for Legal Fees Related to Quo Warranto Process
Discussion and Direction on Mayor Moy's Request for Reimbursement of Her Legal Fees Related to the Quo Warranto Process
Funding Source: General Fund
Contact: David Gassaway, (707) 428-7400

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive report, open discussion, and provide direction to staff.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy has requested City Council consider reimbursing her for the costs of obtaining legal counsel in defense of her residency status related to the quo warranto investigation.
nicri iccinni
In response to the investigation into Mayor Moy's residency status conducted by outside legal counsel, Mr. Gary Winuk, Mayor Moy requested the council to consider reimbursing her for legal costs incurred. Mayor Moy retained the law firm Olson Remcho LLP to represent her in the investigation into her residency by Mr. Winuk. Mayor Moy incurred costs personally for retaining her lawyers and their subsequent work on her behalf. She has not confirmed an estimated cost for legal services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Unknown

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council has authority to take any action they deem appropriate in this request.

COORDINATED WITH
N/A

STAFF CONTACT
David Gassaway, City Manager
(707) 428-7400
[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
N/A