Cities Index.
Agenda

Firebaugh City Council
March 6, 2023

Document
Agenda
Meeting
March 6, 2023
Body
Firebaugh City Council
Pages
2
Original file
4.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on firebaugh.org. That file is the official record.

MEETING AGENDA
The City Council/Successor Agency of the City of Firebaugh Vol. No. 23/03-06 ______________________________________________________________________ Location of Meeting: Andrew Firebaugh Community Center
1655 13th Street, Firebaugh, CA 93622
Date/Time: March 6, 2023/6:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL Mayor Felipe Perez
Mayor Pro Tem Elsa Lopez
Council Member Freddy Valdez
Council Member Silvia Renteria
Council Member Brady Jenkins
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to access the Andrew Firebaugh Community Center to participate at this meeting, please contact the Deputy City Clerk at (559) 659-2043. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the city to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the Andrew Firebaugh Community Center.

Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the Deputy City Clerk’s office, during normal business hours.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

PRESENTATION

PUBLIC COMMENT

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed on the calendar are considered routine and are acted upon by one motion unless any Council member requests separate action. Typical items include minutes, claims, adoption of ordinances previously introduced and discussed, execution of agreements and other similar items.

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – The City Council regular meeting on February 6, 2023.

PUBLIC HEARING
None

NEW BUSINESS

2. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER USE OF THE RODEO GROUNDS

AND WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES BY FIREBAUGH-MENDOTA METHODIST CHURCH, FOR A DINNER DANCE ON MARCH 18, 2023.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & takes action.

3. RESOLUTION NO. 23-07 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH

APPOINTMENT OF CITY MEMBERS TO THE SPECIAL CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & approves Res. No. 23-07.

City Council Agenda
March 6, 2023

Page 2 ends

4. RESOLUTION NO. 23-08 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH OPPOSING INITIATIVE 21-0042A1, LIMITS ABILITY OF VOTERS AND STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO RAISE REVENUES FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & approves Res. No. 23-08.

5. RESOLUTION NO. 23-09 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO TERRA WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 22/23 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AND STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & approves Res. No. 23-09.

6. UPDATE ON ORDINANCE NO. 21-04 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH REPEALING SECTIONS 9-1.1, 9-1.2, 9-1.3, AND 9-1.4 OF CHAPTER 9 [TRAILERS AND TRAILER PARKS] OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, REPLACING THE HEADING OF CHAPTER 9 WITH THE TITLE “MOBILE HOME PARKS ACT”, AND ADDING SECTIONS 9-1.1 THROUGH 9-1.11

RELATING TO THE ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY OF ENFORCING THE MOBILE HOME

PARKS ACT AND SPECIAL OCCUPANCY PARKS ACT OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & gives staff direction.

7. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS THE DEDICATION OF THE FIREBAUGH FIRE DEPARTMENT TO THE BORBOA FAMILY.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & gives staff direction.

8. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS THE SELECTION OF A SOLAR COMPANY FOR THE NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE STATION AND VFW HALL.

Recommended Action: Council receives public comment & gives staff direction.

STAFF REPORTS

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM ONLY

CLOSED SESSION

9. Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) - Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation - One potential case

10. Government Code Section 54957.6.

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS: ALL REPRESENTED & UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES City Negotiator: Ben Gallegos
Employee Organizations: Police & Public Works bargaining units and all unrepresented positions.

ANNOUNCEMENT AFTER CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
Certification of posting the agenda
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Firebaugh and that I posted this agenda on the bulletin boards at City Hall, March 3, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. by Rita Lozano Deputy City Clerk.

MEETING MINUTES
The City Council/Successor Agency of the City of Firebaugh Vol. No. 23102-03
Location of Meeting:

Date/Time:

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
Andrew Firebaugh Community Center
1655 13th Street, Firebaugh, CA 93622
February 6, 2023 I 6 :00 p.m.

Meeting called to order by Mayor Perez at 6:00 p.m.

Mayor Felipe P6rez
Mayor Pro Tem Elsa Lopez
Council Member Freddy Valdez
Council Member Silvia Renteria
Council Member Brady Jenkins
ABSENT:

OTHERS: City Attorney James McCann; City Manager Ben Gallegos; Deputy Clerk, Rita Lozano; Public Works Director, Miohael Molina; Finance Director, Pio Martin; Fire Chief John Borboa; City Clerk, Amanda Fleming; City Engineer, Mario Gouveia; Fernando Campa, Chris Gutierrez & others.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Memher Lopez led pledge of AllegianceAPPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Motion to approve agenda by Council Member Valdez, second by Council Member Jenkins, motion passed by 5'0 vote.

PRESENTATION
. Syserco Energy Solutions, Inc.
r SiteloglQ's Central Valley Local Government Energy Team

PUBLIC COMMENT
None

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. APPROvAL oF MINUTES - The Citv Council reeular meetins on December 19.2022'

2. WARRANT REGISTER - Period startins December I and ending on December 31. 2022.

December 2022 General Warrants #43649 - #43829 $ 1,326,409.03 Payroll Warrants #71925 - #71937 $ 145.376.81
TOTAL $ r,+717*t.*O

3. WARRANT REGISTER- Period startine Januarv 1 and endins on January 31.2023.

January 2023 General Warrants #43830 -#43932 $ 920'014'19 Payroll Warrants #71938 - #71955 $ 143.396.15
TOTAL $ 1,063,410.34
Motion to approve Consent Cslendar with the following checks pulled: #43710-43730, #43805' #43873, #43889, #43894, by Council Member Valdez, second by Council Member Lopez, motion passed by 5-0 vote.

4. City Council Minutcs
Fcbruary 6,2023
Motion to approve the fotlowing checks palled: #43710-43730 - ARPA funds approved by Res. 22-56, #43805 - Petty Cash for Dog Pound food supplies, #43873 - Supersaver portable table for Maldonado Park, #43889 - Senior Citizens Lunch paid from their funding, which the ci6t manages , #43894 - Donaghy Beer Purchase bill from the 2022 carnival, by Council Memher Valdez, second hy Council Member Jenkins, motion passed by 5'0 vote.

PUBLIC HEARING - None

NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO.23-01 - A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'FIREBAUGH ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO EMMETT VALLEY CONSTRUCTION.INC. FOR THE J STITEET AND 1OTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS" FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. CML-5224(O2N AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECU@

6. Motion to approve Resolation No. 23-01 by Council Member Jenkins, second by Council Member Lope;, motion passed by 5-0 vote.

RESOLUTION NO. 23.02 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FII{EBAUGH OF ADOPTING AND RECERTIFYING THE UPDATED SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP).

Motion to approve Resolation No. 23-02 by Council Member Lopez, second by Council Member Jenkins, motion passed by 5-0 vote.

RESOLUTION NO. 23.03 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH ACCEPTTNG COMPLETTON OF 22123 SBl SLURRY SEALS PROJECT. AUTHORTZING THE CITY CLERK

TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH FRESNO COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE FINAL PAYMENT OF RETENTION MONIES TO VSS INTERNATIONAL" INC.

Motion to appruve Resolution No. 23-03 by Council Member Jenkins, second by Council Member Lopez, motion passed by 5-0 vote.
5 7
8 PAYROLL CHECKS.

Motion to approve Resolution No. 23-04, removing "acting" on citlt mansger, removing Marciq Sablan, and adding Elsa Lopez by Council Member Jenkins, second by Council Member Renteria, motion passed by 5-0 vote.

RESOLUTION NO. 23-05 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' FITTEBAUGH

APPROVING A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF FRESNO AND THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH FOR REPLACEMENT OF LAS DELTAS WATER STORAGE TANK.

Motion to approve Resolution No. 23-05, agreement between County of Fresno & City for the HUD tank replacement by Council Member Lopez, second by Council Member Jenkins, motion passed hy 5-0 vote.

9. RESOLUTION NO. 23.06 - A RESOLI]TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH

SUPPORTING AND G THE APPROVAL AND FUNDING OF THE GRANT APPLICATION

SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF HURON TO THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR A LOCAL AGENCY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANT.

Public Utilities Commission for broadband, grant funding of $5,000, no funding available at this time but additional funding maybe allocated.

Motion to approve Resolution No. 23-06 by Council Member Vuldea second by Council Member Jenkins, motion passed by 5-0 vote.

City Coucil Minutes
Fcbruay 6,2023

10. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS THE REOUEST FROM CEN CAL BUILDERS RE: DEL RIO ESIATES HOUSING DEVEL
Contractor's representative requested to be on agenda to ask council to consider amendments to their project from cement wall to wood fence, and to not have to develop Diaz Street. Staff advised the request must go before the Planning Commission for consideration not the City Council. A public hearing announcing the Planning Meeting would be required for the consideration of the requested amendments.

No action taken,

11. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS THE BUSINESS LICENSE FEES.

Recommendation for staff to amend business license fees by categories or types of business, verse gross earnings, present newfees to councilfor consideration at afuture council meeting.

12. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS NAMING THE NEW FIRE STATION.

Motion to nsme the new Jire station the Borboa Fire Station, after the 55 years plus of volunteer Fire Chief service from the Borboafamily members by Councit Member Lopez, second by Council Member Renteria, motion passes 2-1-2.

Council Member Valdez- no, Council Member Jenkins and Mayor Perez- sbstsined,

13. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS PROCEEDING WITH AN RFO FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES.

Motion to proceed with the RFP for City Attorney Services by Council Member Valdea second by Coancil Memher Ienkins; motion passes by 3-2 vote, Council Member Lopez and Council Member Renteris - no.

STAFF REPORTS
D Police Chief SaI Ravsozs - working on annual report and the ordinance on trailer parks to provide an update.

Y Fire Chiet,, John Borbos - nothing to report.

Y Public Works Director. Michael Molina - nothing to report.

Y Citv Manaser, Ben Gsllesos - working with Retail Strategies on recruiting new businesses, they stated the city has been doing everything that they would recommend in succeeding on getting new businesses to our town.

Y Citv Ensineer Mario Gouveia - alley project on 8'h through 9m Street is stalled due to the weather. HWY 33 beautification permit is moving forward and is scheduled to go out in April. Caltrans is potholing on Morris to Lyon on Hwy 33 to prepare for the project, they're also working with the railroad company to start work there later this year. Council Member Lopez asked what we are doing with Cen Cal, Cen Cal must meet the city standards, any amendments request must go be the planning commission for consideration.

Y Deoutv Citv Clerk. Rita Lozano - please submit your Form 700 before the deadline to avoid fines, members that have served on COG committees, need to complete a Form 700 for each committee served, I will be on vacation all next week.

Y Finance Pio Martin - hoping the have the audit report to present soon.

Y Citv Attornev, Iames McCann - nothing to report.

D Council Memher Lopez- suggested a Josh Allen Memorial that was requested by Council Member Jenkins, be placed at 13s St, place on a future agenda for consideration.

City Council Minutcs
February 6,2023
Y Council Member Renteria - attended the League of Cities Conference, learned how many rules we do/can break, we should all go to training as a refresher course to avoid bigger issues' Y Council Member Valdez - Saturday, attended meeting with State Assembly woman Esmeralda Soria held for the westside communities to discuss the issues of our towns, still seeking Prop 68 funding for parks, as well as funding to hire kids.

Y Council Member Perez- attended the last COG meeting, the Director said we have a city app to provide information, city stro.ttO Et a charger for Tesla vehicles, their brining an agency from LA, I informed them we are a community of low income, we should hir locally, instead of bring agency from big cities like LA. Requested the lines on Clyde Fannon be painted, since there hard to see, and address the truck parking issue in that area too. City Manager replied, he attended a meeting on the grid, and believes they want to place a charging station at the park on 166.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None
Motion to enter close session at 8:25 pm by Council Memher Jenkins, second by Council Member Vuldez, motion passes by q 5-0 vote.

CLOSED SESSION

14. Government Code Section 54957
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION: City Manager
Motion to entil open session at 9:18 pm by Council Member Valdez, second by Council Member Jenkins, motion passes by a 5-0 vote.

ANNOUNCEMENT AFTER CLOSED SESSION
No action taken.

ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn at 9:19 pm by Council Member Valdez, second by Council Member Lopezo motion passes by a 5'0 vote- freea*u6U - Vlnrd"nn Vl Er-r-rorpr Clluecv+
DlMAttiz{nN :
.fyE5y3ntrtN6- r' Deulst Pn<oe
Orq
61q=€t4ea Bt>{zg
'g>6
DFrrE q
grlarr- D3'lB'%fls
LoCrtlt>sl ' -rl)so 6eoutoo:

Pqu5- ?qumnsO re finut- Qea
+,e-
\,ui \\
?€\Y*IAL Utr !:nuLaY
be \-.l-1-q3Trd6 A DrNSe?
$DS Tb %t\Y gAC'(
[,AIUCD
-*+e c+ilgL+
DA{$C"L
-fb 'Wt6€ Tu
.TUL
t4
bua
Ctru€eH A-o'rD 'PQqtc Aur
Tk€ M ET+toT)si &ti t)Mr
Ay Fect
s:dn\r{
At\ ?PPzPd) l'^ t t\ ca"
QronL of BuYrtu6 rkl € CN?41
RESOLUTION NO. 23.07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH APPOINTMENT

OF CITY MEMBERS TO THE SPECIAL CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SAN

JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 40600.5 created a Special City Selection Committee for the appointment of city members of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) Governing Board, and
WHEREAS, the Special City Selection Committee has adopted procedures and a rotation schedule for making their appointments, and based upon the adopted rotation schedule a city council member representing a city with a population of less than 100,000 from Fresno County shall be appointed to the District Governing Board, and
WHEREAS, in selecting a nominee for appointment by the Special City Selection Committee to the District Goveming Board, the City Council considered the application materials for the eligible candidates, and
WHEREAS, the Vote to select a nominee took place as an item on the publicly noticed agenda and was discussed during the normal city council meeting with time for public comment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Firebaugh nominates City Council Member Felipe Perez as the City of Firebaugh's representative and Council Member Elsa Lopez as an alternate to the Special City Selection Committee for appointment to the District Governing Board.

The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Firebaugh on the 6'h day of March, 2023 by the following call vote:

AYES
NOES
ABSENT

ABSTAIN
APPROVED:

Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
Council Member(s)
ATTEST:

Felipe Perez
Mayor
Rita Lozano
Deputy City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 23.08

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH OPPOSING INITIATIVE 21.0042AI, LIMITS ABILITY OF VOTERS AND STATE AND

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO RAISE REVENUES FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, an association representing California's wealthiest corporations and developers is spending millions to push a deceptive proposition aimed for the November 2024 statewide ballot; and WHEREAS, the measure includes undemocratic provisions that would make it more difficult for local voters to pass measures needed to fund local services and infrastructure, and would limit voter input by prohibiting local advisory measures where voters provide direction on how they want their local tax dollars spent; and
WHEREAS, the measure creates new constitutional loopholes that allow corporations to pay far less than their fair share for the impacts they have on our communities, including local infrastructure and ow environment; and
WHEREAS, the measure may make it much more difficult for state and local regulators to issue fines and levies on corporations that violate laws intended to protect our environment, public health and safety, and our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the measure puts billions of dollars currently dedicated to local services at risk and could force cuts to fire and emergency response, law enforcement, public health, parks, libraries, affordable housing, services to support homeless residents, mental health services, and more; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Firebaugh opposes Initiative 2l-0042A1; and THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Cify of Firebaugh will join the No on Initiative 2I-0042A1coalition, a growing coalition of public safety, education, labor, local government, and infrastructure groups throughout the state.

We direct staff to email a copy of this adopted resolution to the League of California Cities at Bal [email protected].

The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Firebaugh on the 6'h day of March 2023by the following call vote:

AYES: Council Member(s)
NOES: Council Member(s)
ABSENT: Council Member(s)
ABSTAIN: Council Member(s)
APPROVED: ATTEST:

Felipe Perez, Mayor Rita Lozano, Deputy City Clerk

LEAGUE OF
CI\LIFORNIA
ctTtEs
The Toxpoyer Prolection qnd Government Accounlobility Act lniliqlive No. 2l -0042A1'l
Feb. I,2023
Effective dqle: Any new or increosed tqx or fee odopted by the Legisloture, o city council, or the locol voters ofter Jqnuory l, 2022, must comply wiih the Act's new rules.

Volers
Locol odvisory meosures ore prohibited. No meosUre moy oppeor on the bollot osking for opprovol of o generol tox thot would ollow the voters to express o preference for how the revenue from the generol tox will, could, or should be used.

Overturns tJptond decision which upheld o speciol tox thot hod been ploced on the bqllot by the voters to be opproved by o mojority vote. Toxes proposed by initiotive will be subject to the some rules os toxes ploced on the bqlloi by o city council.

Voters moy not omend o city chorter to impose, extend, or increose o tox or fee.
a
o
a
a
Locqllqxes
. Requires voter opprovol in order to opply on existing tox:
o to teniiory thot is onnexed.
o to o new service or product, for exomple when o utility user tox is opplied to o new service.

All new or increosed toxes odopted ofter Jon. 1 , 2022, must include o sunset dote.

Stqte lqxes
. All new or increosed stote toxes require stotewide voter opprovol. . Prohibiis o properiy tox "surchorge" (increose). Prohibits ony ollocotion of property tox to the stote.
r This is o summory of some of lhe more significonl provisions of lhe Act. Pleose review the Acl for o complete understonding of the chonges it mokes to the constiluiion.

LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA ctilEs
Fees qnd chorges
. Fees ond chorges for services ond permits moy not exceed the "octuol cost" of providing the product or service for which the fee is chorged. "Actuol cost" is the "minimum omouni necessory." Exomples include plonning services, excqvotion ond encroochment permits, preporotion of condidote stotement, ond permit Porking.
o Stote ond cities hove the burden of proving by "cleor ond convincing evidence" thot o fee/chorge is not o tox, thot the omounf is reosonoble, ond thot it does not exceed "octuol cost."
. Fronchise fees
-
historicolly considered fees, not toxes
-
will more likely be
considered toxes due to the eliminotion of on existing coiegory of "fee" ond the requiremeni thot chorges to entronce, purchose, rentql, or leqse of government property be "reosonoble." The stote ond cities issue fronchises to oil componies, utilities, gos componies, roilroods, gorboge componies, cqble componies, ond other corporotions.
. No fee or chorge or exoction reguloting vehicle miles troveled con be imposed qs o condition of property development or occuponcy.

Fines ond penollies (odministrqlive enforcement of slote lqw ond municipol codes)
o Moy require voter opprovol of fines ond penolties for corporotions ond property owners thot violote stote ond locol lows unless o new, undefined odjudicotory process is used to impose ihe fines ond penolties. Exomples include nuisonce oboiement, orgonic wqste reduction requirements, ond foilure to mointoin q vocqnt property.
2 LEAGUE OF

CALIFORNIA
ctTtEs

ACTION ALERT
Stqte Bollot Meqsure
Reslricting Voters' lnpul qnd locql Toxing Authority
'r'{c{' clTY RESOTUTIONS NEEDED {e{'{'
ACTION:

The onti-locol control Colifornio Business Roundtoble meosure hos quolified for the November 2024 bollot. Col Cities requests cities odopl o city resolulion io demonslrote how hormful this meosure would be lo lheir community ond the people of Colifornio.

Send odopted city resolutions to [email protected] os soon os possible. A somp/e cify resolution is offoched.

BACKGROUND
On Feb. 1,2023, the "Toxpoyer Protection ond Government Accountobility Act," or AG# 21-0042A1 , quolified for the November 2024 bollot. This onti-locol control meosure will decimote vitol locol ond stote services to the benefit of weolthy corporotions. The meosure is sponsored by the Colifornio Business Roundtoble (CBRT)
-
lhe lobbying orm of the lorgest ond weolthiest corporotions in Colifornio.

Col Cities, olong with o brood coolition of locol governments, lobor, public sofety, educotion, ond infrostructure odvocotes, strongly oppose this initiotive

SUMMARY
The initiotive limits voters' outhority, odopis new ond stricter rules for roising toxes ond fees, ond moy moke it more difficult to hold violotors of stote ond locol lows occountoble.

Effeclive dole
. All new or increosed toxes or fees odopted by the Legisloture, o city council, or the locol voters ofter Jon. I ,2022, must comply with the Act's new rules.

Slote lqxes
o All new or increosed stote toxes will require mojority voter opprovol.

Locol toxes
. New requirements for voter cpprovol:
o when on existing tox is opplied to o newly onnexed territory. o when on existing tox is opplied to o new service or product, for exomple when o utility user tox is opplied to o new service.

All new or increosed toxes odopted ofter Jon. I ,2022, must include o sunset dote.
a
Fees ond chorges
. Requires thot chorges for occess, use ond rentol of government property be "reosonoble" such os fees chorged for use of government focilities ond public works infrostructure to oil componies, utilities, gos componies, coble componies, ond other corporotions.
. Fees ond chorges for services ond permits moy not exceed the "octuol cost" of providing the product or service for which the fee is chorged. "Actuol cost" is the "minimum Omount necessory." Exomples inclUde plonning seryices, excovotion ond encroochment permits, preporotion of condidote stotement, ond permit porking.
. Stote ond cities hove burden of proving by "cleor ond convincing evidence" thot o fee/chorge is not o tox, thot the omount is reosonoble, ond thot it does not exceed the "octuol cosi."
. No fee or chorge or exociion reguloting vehicle miles troveled con be imposed on new development.

Fines ond penolties [odminislrolive enforcemenl of slqte low ond municipol codesl
. Moy require voter opprovol of fines ond penolties for corporotions ond property owners thot violote stote ond locol lows unless o new, undefined odjudicotory process is used to impose the fines ond penolties. Exomples include nuisonce obotement, orgonic woste reduction requirements, ond foilure to mointoin o vocont property.

Voters
. Locol odvisory meosures ore prohibited. No meosure moy oppeor on the bollot osking for opprovol of o generol tox thot would express the voters' preference for how the tox revenue should be used.
. Overturns Uplond decision so toxes proposed by initiotive ore subject to the some rules os toxes ploced on the bollot by o city council. . Voters moy not omend o city chorter to impose, extend, or increose o tox or fee.

Fiscol
Puts opproximotely $2 billion from fees ond chorges of risk eoch yeor, subject to legol peril.

Puts opproximotely $2 billion of onnuol tox revenue of risk. Mony tox meosures opproved between 2022-2024 will need to be resubmitted to voters to comply ond be reopproved.

TATKING POINTS
Jeopordizes vilol locol ond stole services
. This for-reoching meosure puts of risk billions of dollors currently dedicoted to criticol stote ond locol services.
. lt could force cuts to fire ond emergency response, low enforcement, public heolth, porks, librories, offordoble housing, seryices to support homeless residenis, mentol heolth seryices, ond more.

Undermines voler righls, lronsporency, ond occounlobility . This misleoding meosure chonges our Constitution to moke it more difficult for locol voters to poss meosures needed to fund locol services ond projects.
. lt olso includes o provision thot would retrooctively concel meosures thot were possed by locol voters
-
effectively undermining the rights
of voters to decide for themselves whot their communities need. . lt would limit voter input by prohibiting locol odvisory meosures, where voters provide direction to politicions on how they wont their locol tox dollors spent.
a
a
Opens the door for lowsuils, bureoucrocy. ond red lope thot will cosi toxpoyers ond hurl our communilies
. The meosure would encouroge lowsuits, bureoucrocy, ond red tope thot would cost locol toxpoyers millions
-
while significontly deloying
ond stopping investments in vitol services.

Gives weollhy corporolions o mojor loophole lo ovoid poying their foir shore -
forcing locol residenls ond loxpoyers to poy more
. The meosure would creote new constitutionol loopholes thot ollow corporotions to poy for less thon their foir shore for the impocts they hove on our communities, including locol infrostructure ond our environment
-
shifiing ihe burden ond moking individuol toxpoyers
poy more.

Allows corporolions lo dodge enforcemenl when they violote environmenlol, heolfh, public sofety, ond olher lows
. The deceptive scheme moy creote new loopholes thot moke it much more difficult for stote ond locol regulotors to issue fines ond levies on corporotions thot violote lows intended to protect our environment, public heolth ond sofety, ond our neighborhoods.

C al i f o rni aC it g F I nanc e. C o vvt
Rev.January 74,2023
Fiscal and Program Effects of
lnitiative 21-0042A1 on Local Governments
lf lnitiative 21-OO42A1 is placed on the ballot and passed by voters, it will result in:
. Over $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues over 10 years placed at heightened legal peril. Related public service reductions across virtually every aspect of city, county, special district, and school services especially for drinking water, sewer sanitation, and public health and safety. . About $2 billion of revenues each year from fees and charges adopted after January 1,2021 subiect to legal peril.l
. Over 92 billion dollars of annual revenues from dozens of tax measures approved by voters between January 1, 2022 and the efiective date of the act2 subject to additional voter approval if not in compliance with the initiative.
. lndeterminable legal and administrative burdens and costs on local government from new and more empowered legal challenges, and bureaucratic cost tracking requirements. . The delay and deterrence of municipal annexations.
r Substantially higher legal and administrative cost of public infrastructure financing which will delay and deter new residential and commercial development.
. Service and infrastructure declines including in fire and emergency response, law enforcement, public health, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, public schools, affordable housing, homelessness prevention and mental health services.

1. Local Government Taxes and Services Threatened
\A/ith regard to taxes, lnitiative 21-004241:
. Prohibits advisory, non-binding measures as to use of tax proceeds on the same ballot. o Voters may be less informed and more likely to vote against measures. . Eliminates the ability of specialtax measures proposed by citizen initiative to be enacted by majority voter approval (UPland).3
o Because the case law regarding citizen initiative special taxes approved by majority vote (Upland) is so recent, it is unknown how common these sorts of measures might be in the future, This initiative would prohibit such measures afier the effective date of the initiative. Any such measures adopted after January 1,2022 through the effective date of the Act should it pass would be void a year after the effective date of the initiative. . Requires that tax measures include a specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed. This seems to require that all tax increases or extensions contain a sunset (end date). o This would require additional tax measures to extend previously approved taxes. . A city charter may not be amended to impose, extend, or increase a tax might interfere with the ability of citiei that do not already have such authority in their charters to adopt Property Transfer Taxes. o There are no more than a few of these every few years, but it is a valuable tax for those that adoPt it.
l Assumes fee increases sinceJanuary 1,2022would be subject to possible legal challenge if not adopted in compliance with the Initiative.
2 The effective date of the initiative would be sometime in December 2024,the date the California Secretary of State cert.ifies the election results of the Novembet 5,2024 election.
3 Unlike the initiative 17-0050, this initiative glqes nEl eliminate that ability of cities and counties to adopt general taxes by majodty voter approval.
2217 ls le Royale Lane ' Davis, CA ' 95616-6616
Phone: 530.758.3952' Fax: 530.758.3952
a
a
-2- revJanuary 14,2023
Requires that a tax measure adopted after January 1,2022 and before the effective date of the initiative that was not adopted in accordance with the measure be readopted in compliance with the measure or will be void twelve months after the efiective date of the initiative. o lf past election patterns and elections in 2022 are an indication, over 200 tax measures approving more than $2 billion annual revenues to support local public services would not be in compliance and would be subject to reenactment. Most will be taxes without a specific end date and special taxes (including parceltaxes). Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, the measures would each require declaration of emergency and unanimous vote of the governing board to be placed on a special election ballot within a year for approval or the tax will be void after that date. I would expect most to succeed, but some will not, in particular citizen initiative majority vote special taxes which would have to meet a higher voter approval threshold to continue.

Requires voter approvalto expand an existing tax to new territory (annexations). This would require additionaltax measures and would deter annexations and land development in cities. o lf a tax is "extended" to an annexed area without a vote after January 1,2022, it will be void 12 months later until brought into compliance. Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, such extensions would each require unanimous vote of the agency board to be placed on a special election ballot or would be void a year later.

1.a. Number of Measures and Value of Local Taxes at RislC Over a hundred local measures were approved in 2022 that likely do not comply with the provisions of lnitiative 21-0042A1. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter approved measures will cease a year after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures. We can expect a similar volume of measures in 2024 and a similar volume of non-compliance. So the combined total of annual localfunding directly affected by lnitiative 21-OO42A1due to its retroactivity provision is about $4 billion.

Citizen lnitiative Special Taxes in 2022.

Special taxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative and approved after January 1,2022 by a majority but less than twothirds of the voters are out of compliance with lnitiative 21-004241.

On June 7,2022, there were three local special tax measures placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Two failed to get majority voter approval. A one percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) for the John C. Fremont Hellthcare District in Mariposa County received 69.6 percent approval, over the two thirds needed for any special tax under California Constitution Article XlllC. So this measure was passed in compliance with lnitiative 21- 004241.

June 2022Initiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Estimated
Aqencv Name Countv Tax/Fee Rate Annual Revenue
John c' Fremont Marioosa Measure N T1ul:utt]ont I cent $ 150,000 Healthcare District -- & Use Tax
Use
hospital
Sunset YESTo
40yrs 69.6% PASS
County ofKings Kings Measure F
Transactions
& Use Tax
l/2 cenl $ 1 1,700,000 fire none J7.6% FAIL
Manhattan Beach
USD
los Angeles Measure A $1095/yr $ 12,000,000 schools l2yrs 3l'2% FAIL On November 8,2022, there were l4local specialtaxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Seven of these 4 Source: Compilation and summaty of data from County elections offices' C at if o rni a C it gF inanc e. co rn
School Parcel
Tax
- 3 - rev January 14,2023
measures failed with less than majority voter approval. The other seven measures received majority, but less than two-thirds, voter approval. These measures passed under current law but are out of compliance with lnitiative2l0042A1. Taken together these seven taxes will provide estimated annual revenues of from $900'000 to $1.4 billion in support of parks and recreation, zoo, library, affordable housing, transportation, homelessness prevention, and schools in these communities.

November 2O22lnitiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Esfimated
Aqencv Name Countv Tax/Fee Rate Annua! Revenue
Crockett Cornrnrnitv - :'"-:*" ::"-. *"'- Contra Costa Measure L Parcel Tax $50/parcel $ 60'000 Services District
Oakland
Uer Sunset YES%
parks/recr none ez.sZ PASS
Alarrpda Measure Y Parcel Tax $68/parcel $ 12,000,000 zoo 2Wn az.sv" PASS County of Mendocino Measure O
Transactions
& Use Tax
l/8 cent then l/4
cent in2027 $4,000,000 library none 60.s% PASS
l-os Angeles Ins Angeles Measure Ul-A Property 4/"tf>$Sm5.5V.

TransferTax if>$lOm $600mto $l.l b
affordable
hous ing
none s7J% PASS
County ofSacranrcnto Measure A
Trans actions
& Use Tax
sare l/2cent $212,512,5m transportati 4Wn 553% PASS
San Francisco Proposition M
Business $250C$5000/
Operations Tax vacant resid unit $ 20,000,000 housing 3Wrs 54.5% PASS Santa Monica los Angeles Measure GS
Property
Transfer Tax
$s6l$1000 if
>$8m $ 50,000,000
schools,
honelessne
ss, afford. none s33% PASS
Agencv Name Countv
County ofCalaveras Measure A
Tax/Fee
Transactions
& Use Tax
Rate
I cent
Estimated
Annual Revenue
$ s,000,000
hous
Use Sunset YES%
fire none 494%FAIL
Total $900,000 to
billion
South San Francisco
(for Schools)
San Mateo Measure DD School Parcel
Tax $2.50/sf $ 55,900,000 schools none 47.2% FAIL
County of Fresno (fbr CSU ) Measure E
Transactions
& Use Tax
1/5 ct,
1/40 ct (Reedley) $ 36.000,000
Calif State
Univ 2Qrs 46.q/" FAIL
vacant
Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Measure N Parcel Tax $6klvacant SFU )oo( )oo( 4/'.2%FAIL County of Monterey Measure Q Parcel Tax $49lparcel $ 5,500,000 childcare lQn 4l l% FAIL San Francisco City
College
San
Fmncisco
Measure O
School Parcel
Tax
$150/stu $ 37,000,000 schools l0yrs 36.7% FAIL
Morro Bay San l-uis Measure B Parcel rax $l2Gllparcel $ 680,m0 harbor none 36.U/" FAIL ob
Inverness Public
Utility District Marin Measure O Parcel Tax $ 276.000 fire none 27.0% FAIL Non€pecific Tax Durations in 2022
Voters approved 106 measures in June 2022 (10) and November 2022 (96) that do not provide a specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed (end date). Typically, the ballot titles for these measures state that the tax would be imposed "until ended by voters." Four of these measures also did not include any estimate of the annual revenues that the tax would generate, another violation of initiative 21-0042A1. Taken together, these approved local measures generate $561 million per year that will expire a year after the efiective date of the initiative if I nitiative 21 -0042A1 passes.

C al if o rni aC it gF inanc e. co vw
$0.20lst
$150/vacant
Measures in2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Measure T
Tax/Fee
Business Tax
Creneral
-4-
Rate
vanous
Annual
Revenue
$ 20,900,000
rev January 14,2023
Use Sunset YES%
none 71.4% PASS
Aqencv Name Countv
Oakland Alameda
Culver City [.os Angeles Measure BL Business Tax
Crneral
vanous s 10,000,000 none 60.s% PASS
E Segundo Ins Angeles Measure BT Business Tax
Ceneml various $ 3,000,000 none s1.20l" PASS
Pico Rivera Los Angeles Measure AB Business Tax
Ceneml
various $ 5,800,000 none 75.5% PASS
Santa Ana Orange Measure W
Business Tax
Crneral
various neutral none 64.3% PASS
Tracy San Joaquin Measure B
Business Tax
General
vanous $ 3,200,000 none 72.6% PASS
Burlingame San Mateo Measure X
Business Tax
Ceneral
vanous $ 2.500.000 none 75.I% PASS
los Catos Santa Clara Measure J
Business Tax
Creneral
vanous $ 1,100,000 none s3.4% PASS
Santa Clara Santa Clara Measure H
Business Tax $4Slemployee,
Crneral $I5/rentalunit $ 6,000.000 none se.s% PASS
Brisbane San Mateo Measure O
Business Tax
fgdging bu91
Business Tax
resid. rentals
$2.50/nr/day $ 250,000 none 69.2% PASS
Fast Palo Alto San Mateo Measure L
25%
srossRcots
$ 1,480.000 none 69.9% PASS
County of Santa Cruz Unincorporated Measure C
Busn Taxdisp cups
l2.5cents/cup $700,000 none 68.2% PASS
South lake Tahoe El Dorado Measure G
Busn Tax
Cannabis
60/o rq"ail,
manufacturing
$ 950,000 none 62.9% PASS
McFarland Kem Measure O
Busn Tax
Cannabis
8% ofgross
$25+/sfor
$ 1,800,000 none 63.5% PASS
Avenal Kings Measure C
Busn Tax
Cannabis $ 600,000 none 6l.s% PASSt5% g rcnls
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%
Baldwin Park [,os Angeles Measure CB $ 300,000 .none s13% PASS Rcpts
Claremont I-os Angeles Measure CT Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%.-7Yo gr
rcnts. $1-
$ 500,000 none 61.1% PASS
County oflos Angeles Unincorporated Measure C
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%:8rott
.. $
. .19.9"91pt1 .Ft?'!...... .
15"17q000 none 60.I% PASS
Cudahy l-os Angeles Measure BA Busn Tax
Cannabis
15%
Rcots
$ 3,600,000 none 54.0% PASS
El Segundo l-os Angeles Measure Y
Busn Tax
Cannabis
lV/o
GrossRcpt,
$ 1,500,000 none 72.s% PASS
Hermosa Beach
Lynwood
l,os Angeles
Los Angeles
Measure T
Measure TR
Busn Tax
Cannabis
Busn Tax
Cannabis
t0% $ 1,500.000
CrrossRcpt,
5YoIoljV" $3,000,000
none
none

67.60l" PASS

66.4% PASS
Santa Monica
South El Monte
los Angeles
l,os Angeles
Measure HM
Measure CM
Busn Tax
C3n1abi9
Busn Tax
Cannabis
l0% gross
n Plq
6% special
excise tax on
$ s,000.000
$ 126,000
none 66.4% PASS
none s3.7% PASS
Monterey
Pacific Crove
Monterey Measure J
Monterey Measure N
Busn Tax
. .9,,cl"luhir . ...

Busn Tax
Cannabis
60% grossRcpt $ 1,300,000 none 65.2% PASS
6% grossRcpt $ 300,000 none 70.s% PASS
Huntington Beach Orange Measure O
C al if o rni a C it g F i nanc e. c o un
none 54.?% PASS Busn Tax
Cannabis
6Yo retail, lYo
other
$ 600,000
Measures in2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Measure T
Tax/Fee
Busn Tax
Cannabis
Rate
4o/o-lE/o of
s receints
Annual
Revenue
$ 7s0,000
revJanuary 14,2023
Use Sunset YES%
none 6l.l% PASS
Agencv Name Countv
laguna Woods Orange
Corona Riverside Measure G
Busn Tax
Cannabis
9% ofgross
$ 5,000,000 none 61.6% PASS
for
Montclair San Bemardino Measure R
Busn Tax
Cannabis
7o/n
erossRcots
$ 3,500,000 none 703% PASS
County of San Diego Unincorporated Measure A
Busn Tax
Cannabis
60/o retail,3o/o
distnbution. $ 5,600,000 none s7.4% PASS
Fncinitas San Diego Measure L
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4o/o to'|Yo of
sross receiots
$ 1,400,000 none 65.1% PASS
Healdsburg Sonoma Measure M 8% grossRcpt $ 500,000 none 72.7% PASS Busn Tax Cannabis
Exeter Tulare Measure B
Busn Tax
Cannabis
lffZ retail and
other $10/sf
? none 66.s% PASS
Tulare Tulare Measure Y
Busn Tax
Cannabis
retail and
Sl 0/sf 2 none 65.2% PASS
Woodland Yolo Measure K
Busn Tax
Cannabis
t0%
srossRcDts
2 none 66.2% PASS
Redlands San Bemardino Measure J
Busn Tax tom $O.M?/sf
Distrib centers to $0.105/sf $ 530,000 none 53.5% PASS
Busn Tax
Sports Betting
5%
Arcadia lns Angeles Measure SW nla* none 63.e% PASS
Albany Alameda Measure K ParcelTax $0.074+/sf $ 1,950,000 fne/EMS none 76.0% PASS cameron Park Airport El Dorado Measure J parcelrax $ l 17,900 airPort/ none 282% PASS by $600 to
Districl $900/oarcel streets
Highlands Vllage
Lishtins Benefit Zone
El Dorado Measure L ParcelTax $l4GVparcel $ 10,920 streets none 863% PASS Knolls Property
Owners CSD
El Dorado Measure P ParcelTax
by $30Gr to
$60Gi-/parcel
$ 8,400 streets none 75.5% PASS
Sundance Trail Zone of
Benefit
E Dorado Measure C ParcelTax $600+/yr $ 2,000 roads none 73.2% PASS South Pasadena los Angeles Measure LL ParcelTax )oo( ? library none 86.2% PASS Rrver Delta Fne District Sacramento Measure H ParcelTax $90/yr $ 130,000 fire none 72.1% PASS Fmeryville
$15/$1000 if Alameda Measure O PropTransfTax lnr$2rn $ 5,000,000 none 71.6% PASS $
by lo/oto l.SVo
San Mateo San Mateo Measure CC PropTransfTax $ 4,800.000 none 7l.s% PASS if>Sl0m Alameda Alameda Measure F TOT by 4Vo lo l4%o $ 910,000 none se.2% PASS Clovis Fresno Measure B TOT by 2%oto l2Yo $ 500,000 none 6e.7% PASS Kerman Fresno Measure G TOT t0% $ 40,000 none 623% PASS Trinidad Humboldt Measure P TOT by 4y. to 12yo $ 65,000 none 77.6% PASS Imperial Imperial Measure G TOT by 4y.lo 12yo $ 600,000 none 56.2% PASS Arcadia l-os FIT TOT by 2Voro 12% $730,000 none s4.t% PASS Santa Monica [.os Angeles Measure CS TOT by lo/,,3%
home shares
$ 4.100,000 none 73.7% PASS
Notes
?= Ballot measure titie did not include an estimate of annual revenues, also not in compliance with Initiative 21-004241. nf a*= ArcadtaMeasure SW passed but sports betting remains illegal aftet the failute of Propositions 26 and27 on the November statewide ballot.

C al if o rni a C it gF inanc e. co trn
-6- rev January 14,2023
Use Sunset YES%
none 59.2% PASS
Measures in2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Aqencv Name Countv Tax/Fee Rate
Anaheim oranse Measure J ror "llTllT:t
Annual
Revenue
$ 3,000,000
la Palnra
Colfax
Measure P TOT by 4oA to lT/o $ 200,000
Measure B TOT by 2Y' tol}Yo $ 29,000
none 7I.I% PASS
Placer none 73.5Vo
Rocklin Placer Measure F TOT by 2%olo l9/o $ 300,000 none 59.8% PASS Roseville Placer Measure C TOT by 4Yoto lU/, $ 3,000,000 none 73.0% PASS Big Bear lake San Bemardino Measure P TOT by 2Voto lE/o $ 1,300,000 none 54.4% PASS Gand Terrace San Bemardino Measure M TOT new l07o $250,000 none 51.9% PASS Yucca Valley San Bemarduro Measure K TOT by S%oto l2Y' $ 1,300,000 none 71.e% PASS Imperial Beach San Diego Meas ure R TOT by 4%o to l4%, $ 400,000 none 67.4% PASS E Paso de Robles San Luis ObispcMeasure F TOT by l%oto llYo $750,000 none 61.2% PASS Belmont San Mateo Measure K TOT by ZYolo l4%o $ 600,000 none 7e3% PASS Millbrae San Mateo Measure N TOT by 2%Io l4yo $ 1,50q000 none 7s.s% PASS County of Humboldt Unincorporated Measure J TOT by 2Y,to l2%o $3,080,000 none 633% PASS County ofPlacer- Measure A TOT by 2Yo to ltr/o $ 4,000,000 none e0.0% PASS North Tahne TOT Area
County of Santa Cruz Unincorporated Measure B TOT by lYoto l2/' $ 2,300,000 none 6e.2% PASS County ofE Dorado -
East Slope Tahoe
Measure S TOT 2/3 by 4% to 14y, $ 2,500,000 none 81.8% PASS Chico Butte Measure H TrUT I cent $ 24,000,000 none s2.4% PASS Mendota Fresno Measure H TrUT 1.25 cent $ 493,498 none s7.2% PASS Blue Lake Humboldt Measure R TrUT I cent $ 30,000 none ss.4% PASS Rio Dell Humboldt Measure O TrUT 3/4cenI $ 400,000 none s33% PASS County of Kem unincorporated areas Measure K TrUT 1 cent $ 54,000.000 none 50.8% PASS McFarland Kem Measure M TrUT I cent $579,62 none 62.2% PASS Tehachapi Kem Measure S TrUT I cent $ 4,ooqooo none s7.2% PASS Avenal Kings Measure A TrUT 1 cent $ 500,000 none 72.s% PASS Susanville lassen Measure P TrUT I cent $ 1,750,000 none 54.7% PASS Baldwin Park Ins Angeles Measure BP TrUT 3l4cent $6,000,000 none ss.l% PASS Malibu Ins Angeles Measure MC TrUT l/2 cenl $ 3,000.000 none s2.6% PASS Monterey Park los Angeles Measure MP TrUT ]14 cenl $ 6,000,000 none s8.s% PASS Torrance los Angeles Measure SS'l TrUT ll2cent $ 18,000,000 none 55.0% PASS larkspur Marin Measure G TrUT l/4 cent $ 700,000 none 59.4% PASS Sand City Monterey Measure L TrUT
by l/2cent to

1.5cents
$ 1,400.000 none 68.7% PASS
Henret Riverside Measure H TrUT samo 1 cent $ 15,000,000 none s8.0% PASS Elk C;rove Sacramento Measure E TrUT I cent $21,000,000 none 54.1% PASS Galt Sacramento Measure Q TrUT I cent $ 3,600,000 none 52.4% PASS Colton San Bemardino Measure S TrUT I cent $ 9,500,000 none 66.s% PASS Ontario San Bemardino Measure Q TrUT 1 cent $ 9s,000,000 none s3.2% PASS Solana Beach San Diego Measure S TrUT I cent $ 3,000,000 none 66.7% PASS Brisbane San Mateo Measure U TrUT ll2cent $2,000,000 none 63.e% PASS Cnleta Santa Barbara Measure B TrUT I cent $ 10,600,000 none 64.7% PASS Solvang
C al if o rni aC it gF inanc e. co uw
Santa Barbara Measure U TrUT I cent $ 1,600.000 none 63.1% PASS Measures in2022 with Non-Specific Durations
revJanuary 14,2023
Use Sunset YES%
none 64.4% PASS
-7-
Agencv Name County
Watsonville Santa Cruz
Tax/Fee
Measure R TrUT
Rate
l/2 cent
Annual
Revenue
$ 5,000,000
Vallejo Solano Measure P TrUT 7/8 cent $ 18,000,000 none s4.7% PASS Modesto Stanislaus Measure H TrUT I cent $ 39,000,000 none 62.8% PASS County of Colusa Measure A Trl-]T 2/3 l/2 cent $ 2,400,000 EMS none 6e.4% PASS Atwater Merced Measure B TrUT 2/3 sanr I cent $ 4,000,000 police/fire none 73.7% PASS Truckee Nevada $ 3,000,000
open space
/ trails Measure U TIUT 213
by 1/4 cent to
l/2 cent
none 76.4% PASS
Palo Alto Santa Clara Measure L UtilityTransfer l8% gas $ 2000,000 none 77.7% PASS Santa Clara Santa Clara Measure G UtilityTransfer 5o/o $ 30,000.000 none s4.2% PASS Hercules Contra Costa Measure N ULIT 8o/o $ 3,600,000 none 6er% PASS Carson Los Angeles Measure IJU UUT 2%o electr,gas $ 8,000,000 none 78.4% PASS Sebastopol Sononra Meas ure N UUT 3.75%o (sann) $ 700,000 none 83.s% PASS Co-temporal Advisory Measures in 2022
At the November 2022 election, there was just one local general tax measure that was accompanied by an advisory measure as to the use of funds. The City of Santa Monica's Measure DT property transfer tax failed with just 34 percent approval as voters instead chose the citizen initiative Measure GS.

There was also just one such tax use advisory measure on the June 2022 election. Susanville-'s voters passed Measure P, a 1 percent transactions and use isales) tax that generates $1.75 million per years for general city services. The measure was accompanied by advisory Measure Q, accompanied the city's lt asked, "lf Measure P passes, should the revenues be used to balance the budget to maintain and enhance existing public safety services (police and fire), and provide funding to support street infrastructure improvements and provide funding to support economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs and visitors to Susanville?' Both measures passed. Under lnitiative 21-OO42AI, the tax will expire a year after the effective date of the initiative (i.e., in December 2025).

1.b. Additional Costs and Public Seruice Effects of the Tax Provisions Assuming a similar volume of local measures through 2024 as we saw in 2022, there will be over 200 local measurea that will need to be redrafted to comply with the lnitiative and placed back on the ballot for the taxes to continue after December 2025. The costs of re-drafting, re-placing and re-voting on these measures, previously legally approved by voters, will be in the tens of millions in total statewide.

2. "Exempt Gharqes" (fees and charqes that are not taxes) and Services Threatehed \A/ith regard to fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2022, lnitiative 21-0042A1:
. Subjects new fees and charges for a product or service to a new "actual and reasonable test." . Subjects fees and charges for entrance to local government property; and rental and sale of local government property to a new, undefined, "reasonable" test. . Allows legal challenge to any tax adopted before the effective date of the initiative and after January 1, 5 The Susanville measure also did not include a specific end date and so is included in the list and totals of those measutes.

C al if o rni a C it gF inanc e. co na
- I - rev January 14,2023
2022. Such a lawsuit could enjoin (stop) the enactment of the tax pending the outcome of the legal challenge.
. Subjects a challenged fee to new, higher burdens of proof if legally challenged.

2.a. Value on New Local Government Fees and Charges at Risk6 Mrtually every city, county, and special district must regularly (e.g., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and charges and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies and increases in those fees simply to accommodate inflation, the amount of local government fee and charge revenue placed at risk is about $2 billion per year including those adopted since January 1,2022. Of $2 billion, about $900 million {45 percent) is for special districts, $800 million (40 percenil is cities, and $300 million (15 percent) is counties.T Major examples of affected fees and charges are:

1. Certain water, sanitary sewer, wastewater, garbage, electric, gas service fees.

2. Nuisance abatement charges - such as for weed, rubbish and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs.

3. Emergency response fees - such as in connection with DUl.

4. Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport charges.

5. Business improvement district charges.

6. Fees for processing of land use and development applications such as plan check fees, use permits, design review, environmental assessment, plan amendment, subdivision map changes.

7. Document processing and duplication fees.

8. Facility use charges, parking fees, tolls.

L Fines, penalties.

10. Fees for parks and recreation services.

2.b. Additional Costs and Public Service Effects of the FeelGharge Provisions ln addition to service delays and disruptions due to fee and charge revenues placed at greater legal risk, there would be substantial additional costs for legal defense. The risk to fees and charges will make infrastructure financing more difficult and will deter new residential and commercial development. ***********
6 Source: California State Controllet Annual Reports of Financial Ttansactions concerrung ciues, counties and special distdcts, summa-rized with an assumed growth due to fee tate increases (not populauon) of 2 Percent annually. i School fees are also affected but the amount is negligible by compatison.

C al if o rni a C it gF inanc e. co vn
Business Roundtable Board
Aera Energy
Albertsons
Altria (tobacco)
Anthem Blue Cross
Automobile Club of Southern California
Bittle Enterprises (Enterprise
Rent-a-car)
Blackstone
Caruso Management (Rick Caruso)
Chevron
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons
Dart Container
DLA Piper (Law Firm)
Douglas Emmett
Eli Lilly & Company
Exxon
Farmers Group (lnsurance)
Fivepoint (Developer)
Global Medical Response Solution
Grimmway Farms
lrvine Company
KB Homes
Kilroy Realty
LevatoLaw
Majestic Realty
Marathon Petroleum Corp.

McKinsey & Company
National CORE
PepsiCo
PhRMA
Sempra
State Farm
Sutter Health
Union Pacific Railroad
United Airlines
UPS
Valero
Western National Group
Wells Fargo
Wellpoint (insurance)
Western National Group
TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

Felipe Perez and Council Members
Mario Gouveia, City Engineer
March 6,2023
Resolution No. 23-09

RECOMMENDATION
Council by motion adopt Resolution No. 23-09 - Accepting the low bid from Terra West Constnrction, Inc. for the 22123 Concrete Improvements and Street Rehabilitation project and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Firebaugh identified the need for concrete and pavement repairs in various areas of the city. The 22123 Concrete Improvements and Street Rehabilitation project addresses some of those needs and consists of constructing cwb and gutter, sidewalk, and concrete repairs at various locations in the downtown area. The work also includes pulverizing and repaving a portion of 9th and M Street, and planning and repaving on O Street.

Following a public bidding process, the project was advertised on February 1,2023, February 8,2023, and February 15, 2023. The City received a total of seven (7) bids that were opened and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on February 23, 2023, atthe City of Firebaugh City Hall, this being the advertised bid opening date and time. The lowest responsible and responsive bid was submitted by Tena West Construction, [nc. The bid results were as listed:

Terra West Construction, Inc.

Bush Engineering,Inc.

American Paving Co.

Emmett Valley Construction, Inc
R.J. Berry Jr., Inc.

Avison Construction, Inc.

TBS Contractors
$ 454,373.00
$ 473,732.00
s 528,132.70
$ 536,541.50
$ 576,101.50
$ 664,465.00
$ 686,998.80
Engineer's Estimate s 622,026.00
lt is recommended that a Contract be awarded to Terra West Construction, Inc. in the amount of four hundred fifty-four thousand three hundred seventy-three dollars and zero cents ($454,373.00).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Construction of 22123 Concrete Improvements and Street Rehabilitation will be funded using Local Funds ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 23-09

2. Abstract of Bids
RESOLUTION NO. 23-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO TERRA WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 22/23 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AND STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the lnvitation to Bid for the 22123 Concrete Improvements and Street Rehabilitation Project was advertised in the Firebaugh-Mendota Journal on February 1,2023; and WHEREAS, a total of seven (7) bids were opened and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on February 23,2023, at the City of Firebaugh City Hall, this being the advertised bid opening date and time. The bid results were as listed:

Engineer's Estimate s 622,026.00
WHEREAS, the bids have been reviewed and Terra West Construction, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and
NOW THEREF ORE, by the City Council of the City of Firebaugh, County of Fresno, California, resolves as follows:
l. Adopts a Resolution to award a contract to Tena West Construction, Inc. for four hundred fifty-four thousand three hundred seventy-three dollars and zero cents ($454,373.00).

2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement with Emmett Valley Construction, Inc. on behalf of the City of Firebaugh.

The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Firebaugh on the 6ft day of March, 2023by the following call vote:

Terra West Construction, Inc.

Bush Engineering, Inc.

American Paving Co.

Emmett Valley Construction, Inc
R.J. Berry Jr., Inc.

Avison Construction, Inc.

TBS Contractors
s 454,373.00 $ 473,732.00 $ 528,132.70 $ 536,541.50 $ 576,101.50 $ 664,465.00 $ 686,998.80 ATTEST:

AYES: Council Member(s)
NOES: Council Member(s)
ABSENT: Council Member(s)
ABSTAIN: Council Member(s)
APPROVED:

Felipe Perez, Mayor Rita Lozano, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

I, hereby certify that the forgoing resolution was regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of Firebaugh this 6th day ofFebruary 2023.

Rita Lozano, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Firebaugh

Page 1 ends

ABSTRACT OF BIDS FOR
City of Firebaugh
22123 Concrete lmprovements and Street Rehabilitafion
Bid Opening: February 23,2023 at 2:00 p.m.

TBS Conts&b6
1605 E. Cerdd Ave.

Merc€d CA 95341
l3_750.0c
7_500.0c
6,230.0t6,230.0(
76,t67.31
t7,2t7.5(
32,875.0t

12.380.0(
53,745.0030-834 5044.702.OO
208-362.0t

7.500.00
t-562.50
I-562.50
1E7.50

2.5E7.505,800.00
BIII TOTAL s622.025.00 ** s454J73.00 s473-7!2.00 s528.132.70 s536S41.50 sst5.t0r.s0 s65,r-lr6s.00 s686^99f,"80 Unlt PHc.
l3-750.0c
?-500.0(6.230.00
6,230.00
r36.5 l

30.07 t7,2t7 .51)t6.437.5012,380.00
?5 81

0.83 t.24
I57.85
t.875.00
l-562.50t-562.50

3.'t52.50

5.00 Avison Constrction, Ihc.
40434 Brickyrd Drive
Madem- CA 93636
20-0m.00
7-500.0c
I0,000.00

7.500.0c
88,655.0C
16,000.0c

4.000.0c
52,500.0{33-435.0C36-050.0c
198.000.0c

8.000.0t

1.200.0(
I-200.0t
300.0(
2,070.(X

5.800.0(
Urlt PHce
20-000.00
7-500.00
I0-000.00
7,500.00
r35.00

35.00 15,000.00
8-000.00
4,000.00
35m

0.90 1.00
150.00

2.000.00

1.20{.t.00
I.2LU.00

6.003.00
R.J. Bcrry J.., Inc.

PO Box468
Selmr CA 93662
20-000.0c
7-500.0{
I l-000.0{I 1.000.00

88.655.00
r8.000.0t12.000.00
45 0m oo
l4-860.00

54.075-00
I5 1.800.00

6.000.00

1.u.t0.00t.ux).00
175.00

1.552.50

3.48030
Urlt He

20.000.00
7-500.0c
I I^000.mI I,000.0{

90.0(3s.0(
r8.000.0c12.000.0(
iotr
o.4(
I.5(
I t5.0t
1,500.0{.
r.0{J0.0(
I.000.0t

3.5(

1.50 3.00
Emmeft Valley Const., Inc.
9662 w. Kem€y Blvd.

Fresno. CA 93706
Ahoort

8.500.007-500.m
E.000.006,500.0c
6t.243.0C
101,320.0c

4.s00.0c
6,000.0c2,000.0c
51 00000
l4-860.00
43260.00
167.640.00
J.UOU.OU
650.0{.}750.002U0.00

1.552.50
--- 338d66
Untt PHe

8.500.0t

7.500.00

8.000.00

6.500.00
9 1.0040.00
4,500.00
3,000.002_000.00
34 00

0.40 1.20
127-00
750.UU65U.00750.00

4.U0
1,50
Americe Paving Co.

PO Box2?58?
Fresno. CA 93729
Amout

10.000.00

7.500.00
t2-m0.m

64.338.20
20,000.0026,000.00
l0-000.00
36-000-00
I 6.7 17.50
2 1.630.00
15u.400.00
9,200.uu
l,6w.0u
1,600.00
25U.UU

3.105.00
Unta He

10.000.00

7.500.00

12.000.u012,000.00

90.0025.40
20,000.00

13.000.00
io.000-.66

24.OO

0.45u.60
l:u.00

2.300.00

1.60U.WI.600.00

5.003.00
BBh Engineering, lnc.
5 I 8 N. Redington St.

Hanford. CA 93230
AEoutrl
:0.000.0{J

7.500.0u

12.360.0u
47 50.660.00
l 1,000.00
t3.070.00
-ffi
39-000-0c
I523 I 50
32345.Ui
14E.500.u

9.020.0c2.192.0C2.t92.0t2,4r2.5(
3,r05.0t
Urtt Prh.

10.000.00

7.500.{r0
1t.360.0u12.360.0{J
? 1.0020_00
l r.000.00
6,535.00

4.247 _OA
?6.0c

0.41u.9(
I 12.5[

2.255.042,t92.N2,192.M

48.25 3.0(
Tena West Const., Inc.
1030 Gehbug Avc. Stc 107
Clovis. CA 93612
Am0nt
:0.000.u)

7.500.00E.I00.0{J6.000.o0

52.494.04

68.391.00
10,000.00
I4,000.00
3-000.00
33-000.00
I4J60JO
2l.6JU.0U
I 53.1 20.0U

8.400.0c
350.m
500.m
200.0c

2.070.0c
Utrtt Plde

20.000.00

7.5U).Ui
E.tu).txl

6.000.fii
--8ft 27.U

10.000.0c

7.000.0[
3-000.0c

22.0t

0.4(

0.6(
I l6.Ut
2,100.0c
350.0(500.0(

4.002.00
Engineer's Estimate
Amo!trt
20 000.00
? 500 00? 500 00? 500 00

63.325.O0

20.000.00
to (no 0n

45.000.0046 417 5A46_865.00
178200.00
5-600.00
900.00?00.0c200.00

3.622.54
udt Prl@

20.000.00

7.500.007.500.00

25.0C
20,000.00
I0.000.0c
30 0t
l.3[
r35.0(
l,4uu.ut
9UU.U(700.0(

4.U

3.50 QuaDdty
rnd Ihlt

I ILSI ILSI IEAI IEA
673lLF

2.533 ISF
I IEA
2IEA2IEA
'l*
3? r50lsF36.050tsF
r.320t r N
4IEA
JUILh
r,035lLFr rrolr.r
MobilizationTmtfic ContolConstut Twc A Catch BasinConsmd Circtrld Catch BasinRemove and Replace Curb and GuttcrConshrct Concrcft SidewalkRemove and Replace Valley GunerConstut Casc A Cub RampCoNmct Conorete Repairs at MaldoMdoParkAsDhalt Concreb PlaninsPulvcriz ild Gfrde PavementFumish ild Piee AsDhall ConcreteAdiust Mabholc CovcrAdiEt Watcr Mster BoxAdiut Elcchcal Pull BoxADDIV Sinslc E-lnch StnDrosAnnlv Sinrle 4-lnch ShipinsAhblv Double 4-Inch StriDinI ItemNo2
34 679
l0I
2 t3
\4
l5l6t7IEt9
20 Concrcte
Haydon Cosmction lnc.Made€ Concrete Co.T&T Pavcmctt Markings Coffected unit ptice per lnfotmotian to Bidders pg. 1'1, poragroph f, item (o) * * Corected bid tatol due ta correctian of bicl item * I T&T Pavefrent Makings
Network
Madm Concrete Co.T&T Pavement Markings
Frcsno Concrcte Const., lnc.Haydon Consmction Inc.

T&T Pavement Mdkings
None Hmsley Paving & Gen. Eng.

Womack Stiping, Inc.
745.36
Firebaugh Police Department
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Felipe Perez and Gity Councilmembers From: Chief Salvador Raygoza
GC: City Manager Benjamin Gallegos
Date: 0310112023
Re: Ordinance Mobile Home Parks
In late 2021, Council asked city staff to investigate the possibility of city code enforcement and the building department assumed the responsibility of enforcing Califomia's Mobile Home Park Act within the city limits. The California Department of Housing and Community Development is currently responsible for issuing permits and inspections of mobile home parks within the City of Firebaugh. The city has no authority to conduct code enforcement inspections or issue permits. City Council wanted to explore the idea due to none-response by state inspectors regarding repeated complaints of some of the substandard housing at some of the city's mobile home parks.

More than 20 million people live at mobile home parks within the U.S., largely due to its affordability. The City of Firebaugh currently has four mobile home parks within the city limits, two are privately owned by investors and the other two are owned by local long-time Firebaugh residents.

To comprehend the impact this would have on the city's building department and the police department's code enforcement officer, staff had two community meetings to hear some of the concerns from mobile home park owners and residents who live there. Code enforcement also began tooking into potential issues within the existing mobile home parks that would become city issues if a municipal code ordinance were adopted. During the meetings we discovered a mixture of opinions from the owners and residents relating to the city taking over mobile homes parks code enforcement.

Most of the residents are against the city taking over due to possible strict rules, existing violations, evictions, lack of local housing and permits. Residents are also concerned about rents and other utilities being raised by mobile home parks owners and the city not doing anything to protect them from their landlord. A resident asked about the city having rent control ordinance to protect them from the owners that are pushing for higher rents to get them to move out.

On the other hand, most of the mobile park owners would like the city to pass the Mobile Parks Ordinance and take over the code enforcement within the city's mobile parks. The owners see the ordinance as something that will be beneficial to the city, owners, and tenants due to local oversight.

Code enforcement discovered that a large number of mobile homes at certain locations will require lots of code enforcement attention requiring countless hours of work fi'om the building department and code enforcement officer. Some of the most noticeable violations that were noted is as follows:
alteration of existing mobile home.
accessory structures or additions.
exposed electrical and plumbing equipment.

Combustible debris next to mobile home.
appliances outside connected with extension cords.
stairways not safe or stable.

Unsafe attached catports and awnings.

We anticipate that some of the mobile homes are going to be inhabitable, based on mobile home code enforcement standards.

The Firebaugh Police Department is responsible for enforcing the city municipal code, which covers a broad range of things, such as animal control, unpermitted structures, parking enforcement and a variety of other cases ranging from public nuisance to zoning. The department currently has one Code Enforcement Officer that responds to municipal code complaints, and he addresses code violations that he observes while driving around the city. The officer works 24 to 30 hours a week, not enough time to address all the existing issues within the city. Code enforcement complaints and existing Issues are often addressed based on their priority level, with most dangerous cases getting the most urgent response. The police department and city hall does not have the staffing to deal with mobile home code enforcement and inspections.

I recommend that we do not adopt the Mobile Home Parks Ordinance introduced to council December of 2021 for the following reasons.

Staffing issues
Displaced Residents
Lack of local affordable housing
Allow mobile park owners time to get their tenants in compliance or they can get tenants evicted for none compliance
Report is submitted to council for discussion, consideration and provide staff direction on City Council wishes.
. Page 2
ORDINANCE NO.21-04

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'FIREBAUGH REPEALING SECTIONS 9-1.1, 9-1.2, 9-1.3, AND 9-1.4 OF CHAPTER 9 [TRAILERS AND TRAILER PARKSI OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, REPLACING THE HEADING OF CHAPTER 9 WITH THE TITLE *MOBILEHOME pARrG ACT", AND ADDING SECTIONS 9-1.1 THROUGH 9-1.11 RELATING TO

THE ASSUMPTION OF'RESPONSIBILITY OF ENFORCING THE MOBILEHOME PARKS ACT AND

SPECIAL OCCUPANCY PARKS ACT OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FIREBAUGH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Sections 9-l.1, 9-l.2, 9-1.3, and 9-l.4 of Chapter 9 fTrailers and Trailer Parks] of the Firebaugh Municipal Code are hereby repealed.

Section 2. The heading of Chapter 9 of the Firebaugh Municipal Code is hereby amended, and new sections 9-L 1 through9-l.12, are hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Firebaugh Municipal Code to read as follows:

Chapter 9 Mobilehome Parks Act
$ e-I.1
$ e-1.2
s e-I.3
$ e-l.4
$ e-l.s
$ e-r.6
$ 9-r.7
$ e-1.8
$ e-r.e
$ e-1.10
$ e-l.11
$ 9-1.12
Legislative F'indings.

Assumption of Responsibilities.

Delegation of Authority.

Schedule of Fees.

Statement of Objectives.

Description of Existing Mobilehome Parks.

Effective Date of Assumption.

Method of Enforcement.

Use of State Forms.

Permits to Operate and State Fees.

Transmittal of Ordinance.

Notice of Assumption of Enforcement.
$ e-r.r Legislative Findings.

The City Council finds and determines that:
a. The City of Firebaugh (City) currently has four (4) mobilehome parks operating within the City. b. The mobilehome parks within the City have not been inspected for compliance with state building regulations in several years.
c. Many of the buildings within the City's mobilehome parks are maintained in a substandard condition with noticeable structural issues and constitute fire hazards. d. The City currently lacks jurisdiction to inspect and enforce state building regulations relating to mobilehome parks, as the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) retains such authority.
e. HCD is responsible for approximately 83o/o of all mobilehome parks throughout the state. f. The City has significant need for timely inspection and enforcement of its mobilehorne parks in order to maintain the health and safety of its citizens. g. The rural character of the City necessitates a local enforcement focus. h. California Health and Safety Code section 18300 provides a mechanism for the City to assume responsibility of the enforcement of state law relating to mobilehome parks and special occupancy parks.

Ordinance 21-04
Firebaugh City Council
i. The City has the staff and ability to assume responsibility for the enforcement of its mobilehome parks.
j This Ordinance is necessary to provide the necessary public health and safety enforcement and regulatory tools to address the health and safety concerns affecting the City's mobilehome parks. $ 9-1.2 Assumption of Responsibilities.

Pursuant to Section 18300 of the California Health and Safety Code, and upon authorization from the HCD and subject to the acceptance of reasonable conditions of approval, if any, the City of Firebaugh hereby assumes responsibility for the enforcement of Division 13, Part 2.1, commencing with section 1 8200 (Mobilehome Parks Act) and Part 2.3 commencing with section I 8860 (Special Occupancy Parks Act), of the Health and Safety Code and their implementing regulations set forth in Title 25, California Code of Regulations Division 1, Chapters 2 and2.2, the building standards published in the California State Building Standards Code relating to mobilehome parks, special occupancy parks, travel trailer parks, recreational trailer parks, temporary trailer parks, incident camping areas, and tent camps and the related administrative regulations (collective referred to as "the Acts".) $ 9-1.3 Delegation of Authority.

Pursuant to HCD approval, the City shall be the enforcement agency as defined by section 18207 of the Health and Safety Code and will assign the responsibility for the enforcement of the Acts to the City's Police Department. The Police Department shall provide qualified personnel for the actual enforcement of the Acts. The Department will assign one (l) code enforcement officer to be dedicated to carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Acts, including but not limited to inspecting the City's mobilehome parks and issuing notices of violation when necessary. The Police Department may utilize other code enforcement officers to assist when necessary.

The City will assign the responsibility for the collection and issuance of permits and state fees, maintenance of mobilehome park records, and the monitoring of compliance of the mobilehome parks, to the City's Building Department.
$ 9-1.4 Schedule of Fees.

The City hereby adopts the fee schedules as contained in the Acts at Division 13, Parts 2.1 and2.3, and implementing regulations. Any increases or revisions of the fee schedules noted above will be enforceable within the City limits.
$ 9-1.5 Statement of Objectives.

The City hereby adopts the program and statement of objectives contained in the Acts. The City's specific local objectives, include but are not limited to providing timely and reliable enforcement of the Acts, reduction of threats of fire, and protections public health, safety, and welfare inside of Mobilehome and Special Occupancy Parks. The City intends to enforce and implement the program to include all parks now under HCD jurisdiction and any new parks that may be created within the City. $ 9-1.6 Description of Existing Mobilehome Parks.

According to statistics provided by HCD, there are cwrently four (4) mobilehome parks within the City, which includes ninety-eight (98) mobilehome spaces, nine (9) recreational vehicle spaces with drains, and four (4) recreational vehicle spaces without drains. Immediately upon assumption of enforcement responsibilities the City will initiate inspection pursuant to the requirements of the Acts. The occupancy and condition of mobilehome parks shall be substantiated upon approval by the HCD to assume responsibility for enforcing the Acts.
2 Ordinance 21-04
Firebaugh Cify Council
$ 9-1.7 Effective Date of Assumption.

The effective date of assumption of enforcement responsibilities shall be within thirty (30) days following adoption of this ordinance and HCD approval.
$ 9-1.8 Method of Enforcement.

Not later than thirty (30) days from the Effective Date of Assumption of Enforcement, as defined in section 9-L7, the City shall commence and thereafter diligently enforce the Acts as follows:
a. Review and maintain relevant files provided by HCD and compare same with records on file with the City.
b. Review pertinent state building standards relevant to mobilehomes, manufactured homes, and special occupancy parks.
c. Ascertain the status of all permits to operate, construction permits, and enforce relevant requirements.
d. Investigate and resolve complaints received from occupants, neighbors, other agencies, and all other sources of complaints.

Perform annual mobilehome park maintenance inspections consistent with the Acts as set forth in Health and Safety Code section 18400.1 and its implementing regulations. f. Take all other actions as are deemed appropriate in furtherance of state laws and regulations. $ 9-1.9 Use of State Forms.

When enforcing the Acts, the City shall utilize the following HCD forms:
a. HCD 500,4' - Application for Permit to Operate.
b. HCD 5038 - Annual Pemit to Operate.
c. HCD 5l3B - Manufactured Home or Mobilehome Installation Acceptance. d. HCD 513C - Certificate of Occupancy.
e. HCD 538 - Plot Plan.

S 9-1.10 Permits to Operate and State Fees.
a. The City shall bill each of the mobilehome parks within its jurisdiction for the state fees required for the annual permit to operate, and issue said permits upon collection of the state fees. b. The City shall send a copy of all permits to operate and state fees collected to the Administrative Office of the Division of Codes and Standards, no later than thirty (30) days after the City's issuance of such permits and receipt of such funds.
e.
3 Ordinance 21-04
Firebaugh City Council
$ 9-1.11 Transmittal of Ordinance.

The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit two (2) certified copies of this Ordinance to the Director of HCD and to the Administrative Office of the Division of Codes and Standards to P.O. Box 278180, Sacramento , CA 95827 -8 I 80, within ten ( I 0) days of the date of adoption which, in any event, shall not be less than thirty (30) days before the Effective Date of Assumption of Enforcement Responsibilities ($ e-1.7.)
$ 9-1.12 Notice of Assumption of Enforcement.

Upon HCD's approval of the City's assumption of enforcement of the Acts over the mobilehome parks, and no later than two (2) weeks prior to the Effective Date of Assumption of Enforcement Responsibilities ($ 9-1.7), the City shall notify inwriting each of the mobilehome parks and special occupancy parks within its jurisdiction of the change in enforcement and that the Building Department is now responsible for enforcement and issuance of permits.

Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this ordinance to be codified after its adoption.

Section 5. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to cause this ordinance, or a summary of this ordinance, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Firebaugh within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of this ordinance is published, then the City Clerk also shall cause a summary of the proposed ordinance to be published and a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the Office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the Council's meeting at which the ordinance is to be adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The City Attorney shall approve the summary. ***
The foregoing Ordinance No. 2I-04 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Firebaugh on the l't day of November 2021, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 20'h day of December,202l, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED ATTEST:

Rita Lozano, Deputy City Clerk
4 Freddy Valdez, Mayor

MEMORANDUM
DATE: 02/28/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor, Felipe Perez
City Council Members, City Manager and Staff
FROM: Councilmember Silvia Renteria
SUBJECT: Consider accepting the dedication of the Firebaugh Fire Department to the Borboa Family,
BACKGROUND: The Firebaugh Fire Department project is nearing complete and will replace the flre station currently located at 1575-11th Street, which was built around 1948. Between 1920 and 2023, many men and women have volunteered their time, and sacrificed their lives to protect life and property.

DISCUSSION: To dedicate the new Firebaugh Fire Department to the Borboa Family.

Since 1920, the Borboa family have been part of the Firebaugh Fire Department and have worked tirelessly to protect life and property. Their mission was to assure that the fire department would serve a greater purpose for the community and the citizens.

Their service, commitment and dedication has shown their loyalty to the City of Firebaugh.

Borboa Firemen: Ramon A. Borboa (First Fire Chief 1920 - approximatelyl935), Casey Borboa (Fire Chief 1940 - 1979), John G. Borboa (Fire Chief 1979 -2023), David Borboa, Cecil Borboa, Ramon Borboa, Jr., Tootie Borboa, Gilbert Borboa, Brad Borboa I ask that council put aside their personal preconceived opinions and recognize that the Borboa men have left a legacy, which has demonstrated their loyalty, commitment and dedication to the Firebaugh Volunteer Fire Department.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Dedication of the new Firebaugh Fire Department to the Borboa Family.

PROPOSED ENGRAVING:

This new building was made possible through a generous grant from the Community Development Block Grant and will replace
the originalfire station located at 1575-1lth Street.
ln gratitude, honor and recognition of the Borboa Family for seventy-five years of service, commitment and dedication to the Firebaugh Volunteer Fire Department
and the citizens of Firebaugh.

Dedicated Month DD, YYYY

MAYOR - FELIPE PEREZ
FIRE CHIEF - JOHN G. BORBOA

CITY COUNCIL

ELSA LOPEZ ALFREDVALDEZ

BRADY JENKINS MARCIA SABLAN
I wish to offer my proposal in honoring the Borboa Family. Certainly, it is a most fitting honor and one ofthe most deserved ones I know of.

John, I want to extend my deepest appreciation for the years, efforts, and service you and your family have dedicated to the communi$ of Firebaugh and surrounding areas Thank you. - Silvia Renteria, Councilmember
City of Firebaugh
Presented by:

Heather Roeme & Josh Sarpotdar
Syserco Energy Solutions, Inc.

ENERGY SOTUIIONSSYSERCO
Police Department & Fire Station 5-J SYSERCO f / FNrrcY SorurroNS \-/ * Engineering Helioscope design provided upon SES selection Confidential & Proprietary 2
Project Details
Purchase I Contract Price:

Estimated lnflation Reduction Act / lnvestment Tax Credit:

Net Purchase Price (Amount Needed to Finance):

Ongoing and Planned Expenses:

Performance Guarantee: Avaitable Under Separate Contract:

Estimated O&M:
(1x Panel Wash/Yr., lnspection and Minor Repairs if necessary) Budget for lnverter Replacement (Yea r I2):
@SYSERCO GNERGY SOTUIIONS
s628,923S tgg,6zz
Sqqo,2+6
Sz,z3s in Yr I
$t,soo in Yr 1S tz,soo
Confidential & Proprietary 3
Project Cash Flow Modet A
Modeled using Annual Savings of Sa2,224 - using CURRENT PG&E Rates ModeI A.)
CEC ECAA Loan at Lo/o lnterest - 13 Year Term
3VaAnnuaI Escalator for Utility Costs
3o/oAnnual Escatator for O&M and Performance Guarantee Costs @SYSERCO EtrEIGY SOTUTIONS
Confidential & Proprietary 4
628,923
188,677
Cost
lnflation Reduction Act
Cash Flow Analysis CEC ECAA 1olo Loan
Assumes 3o/o Annual Utility Escalation SYSERCO
Solar Pol Fire & VFW Aggregate
$ 440,246

1.00*i
13 Princioal (Net Proiect Costl
Rate tcEc ECA.A Loanl
Term [yrsl
Performance
Guarantee & O&M
Annual Escalator

3.O%
Annual Utility
Rate Escalation

3.096
Cumulative
Cumulative Cash Flow Cash Flow
lnverter
utility Replacement
5 Annual
Performance
Loan s
Annual O&M
Expense
Project Cash Flow Modet B
Modeled using Annual Savings of 542 ,224 - using CURRENT PG&E Rates Model B.)
CEC ECAA Loan at ta/o lnterest - 13 Year Term
6a/sAnnuaI Escalator for Utility Costs3o/oAnnuaI Escalator for O&M and Performance Guarantee Costs @SYSERCO ENERGY SOIU'IONS
Confidential & Proprietary 6
Performance
Guarantee & 0&M
Annual Escalator

3.OVD
Annual Utility
Rate Escalation

6.096
Cash Flow Analysis CEC ECAA 1olo Loan
Assumes 3o/o Annual Utility Escalation
Cumulative Savi Cash Flow
Utility Annual
Loan $
lnverter
Replacement
ent 5 s
Annual O&M
Expense
Performance
Gua

ENERGY SOLUIIONS

SYSERCO
CumulativeCash Flow
$ 628,923$ 188,67l
Froiect Cost $lnflation Reduction Act
5 'l{0,246

1.0096
13 Frincioal {t{et Proiect costlttate tcEc ECAA LoanlTerm (vrsl Solar Police, Fire & VFWAggregate
44224 (1235) $ (1,500) _*$@ 3&4se- t _*
Authorize City Manager to Finish Negotiations with SES
Submit Application to secure NEM2 Solar
lnterconnection (THIS lS URGENT! ! !)
SES Works With Pio to Secure Funding
City and SES Execute CA42I.7 Agreement March 2023
Kick off Project April 2023
Thank you for your time!
Please feel free to contact me.

Josh SarpotdarP roj ect Deve lo p m e nt M a n o g e r
i.sa [email protected] I 916.496.5389
Heather Roeme
Customer Core-Key Account Monager
h. ro em e@syse rco-es. co m I sss.zso.tzl I

ENERGY SOLUIIONS

SYSERCO
sitelo
rI /
-l*
Efticiency Powered bygrs
March 3,2023
Ben Gallegos
City Manager
City of Firebaugh
1133 P Street
Firebaugh, C493622
RE: Facility Solution Project Feasibility and Letter of Agreement (LOA) Dear Mr. Gallegos
This Letter of Agreement (LOA) is intended to briefly describe the manner in which SiteloglQ and the City of Firebaugh will work together during the engineering process, as well as the obligations of each party with respect to the engineering process.

Glient ldentification: City of Firebaugh
Facility Location(s):

Fire Department
Police Department
VFW Hall
Area of Focus:

SiteloglQ will provide a proposal and Facility Solution agreement for the implementation of facility improvements, energy conservation, energy generation, and/or energy management services.

Scope of Services:

A. SiteloglQ will conduct a site visit to the Facility(ies) to perform a physical audit and collect data. The Client will cooperate and collaborate with SiteloglQ during this phase by providing copies of requested data, including (if available): Site and/or system drawings, historical operating data produced or recorded by existing controls or meters, manual logs, and any other data that may be pertinent to this evaluation.

B. Client will also make operational personnel available at reasonable times for in-person and telephone interviews with SiteloglQ to answer questions about existing facilities conditions, operating profile and existing equipment operation.

C. Where operational data is not available to support the analysis, SiteloglQ will utilize standard CA Office: 1572 Silica Ave, Socrdmento, CA 95815
Phone: (976) 978-7375 . Fax: (976) 978-5813
www.sitelogiq.com . CA License #646794
sifgtg,g,iH
engineering practices and assumptions to provide a conservative analysis on the potential energy savings from installing the energy conservation measures.

D. SiteloglQ will also analyze the potential for energy generation measures.

E. SiteloglQ will recommend energy management and/or on-going monitoring services F. For each of the targeted Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs), estimated (projected) operating costs will be calculated and then compared to existing operating costs. Existing conditions will be evaluated using data-logged or stipulated and mutually agreed operational schedules.

G. SiteloglQ will prepare a return on investment analysis (consistent with the client's preferred evaluation methods based on agreed upon Economic Criteria noted below).

H. SiteloglQ will provide budgetary construction costs estimates and a summary Scope of Work for all recommended EGMs. Cost estimates will represent a "turnkey" solution. Refer to Attachment A for the list of discussed potential ECM's to be evaluated. l. All design engineering required for preparation and submittal of lnterconnection Application(s).

J. The results will be presented to client as a recommended Scope of Work and a financial proforma (such as a Cash Flow) which will include costs and energy savings for the next 30 years with escalation of no more than 6% and including future maintenance & repair costs. As a result, True Cost of Ownership is presented to the client for their review and consideration Client Responsibilities:
ln order for SiteloglQ to provide the services described in this LOA, the Client agrees to provide (or cause its energy suppliers to provide) SiteloglQ with utility billing and interval data.

Development Efforts:

Client acknowledges that SiteloglQ will incur considerable expense in developing the Project.

This expense includes the cost incurred by SiteloglQ's development team, the cost to visit the Site, and the cost to prepare the financial proforma. SiteloglQ is acting hereunder as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of the Client. SiteloglQ shall not represent or othena/se hold out itself or any of its directors, officers, partners, employees, or agents to be an agent or employee of the Client.
lnterconnection Application:
lf applicable, SiteloglQ may request important Distribution System information from the local utility regarding planned solar interconnection points, priorto submitting an lnterconnection Application during construction of a Solar Generation PV Array. The purpose is to avoid or address early in the design phase any existing utility infrastructure that may prohibit or delay the construction of a 2 sif,"gtg,g,iH
Solar Generation PV Array at any of the listed locations. lnterconnection Application(s) will be prepared and submitted prior to April 14th 2023.

Ownership of Work:

Allwork products, including all proforma's, schedules, and scope of work documentation provided by SiteloglQ, will only become the property of the Client upon execution of a binding, irrevocable contract between the Client and SiteloglQ for the implementation of the ECMs proposed by SiteloglQ. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any tangible work documentation produced by SiteloglQ contains SiteloglQ's pre-existing materials (including but not limited to templates, forms, and other SiteloglQ -created materials), SiteloglQ will remain the sole and exclusive owner of all such pre-existing materials.

Development Fee:

SiteloglQ will develop the Project for the firm, fixed fee/rate as listed below:

1. Total Fee not to exceed $15.000.00 broken down in phases as follows:
a. $7,500 Fixed Fee, lnterconnection Application Phase. lncludes one NEM 2.0 interconnection application for the PV system design chosen by Client. PG&E may require additional fees (not included in Total Fee) for additional studies and submittals (i.e. System lmpact Study, etc.). Client will be responsible for additional PG&E fees if Client decides to move forurrard with such studies. b. After the lnterconnection Application Submittal a $7,500 Fixed Fee, for Svstem Desiqn Phase Upon Notice to Proceed by client, SiteloglQ will complete a design packet for the purposes of finalizing scope and a fixed price Proposal for discussions with Client.

2. Client shall be entitled to terminate this agreement for convenience upon the occurrence of the following circumstances:
a. At any time prior to the Design Phase. Client shall only be responsible for paying the Fixed Fee amount for the lnterconnection Application Phase. ($7,500) b. After System Design Phase. Client shall be responsible for paying the Total Fee of the agreement. ($1S,OOO; as set forth herein.

3. ln the event that the Client enters into a contract with SiteloglQ for the implementation of the ECMs within 60 days after presenting the Proposal, then SiteloglQ's cost to develop the Proposal will not be billed. lf the Client enters into a contract with SiteloglQ at a later date, the Development Fee paid by the Client will be credited toward the project's total implementation cost.

4. lf SiteloglQ cannot meet the Economic Criteria as defined below, Client will not compensate SiteloglQ for its LOA fee.

Economic Griteria:

The Client has represented to SiteloglQ that Client agrees to move fonrvard with the project if the project is shown to reduce the operational expenses at the site over the useful life of the prolect.

The main financial objectives of the project are as follows:
3 silg,tg,g,is

1. Provide a self-funded program, which pays for itself through expense reductions and meets the requirements of California Government Code 4217.10 et seq'

2. Project, or component of project, will meet requirements of the California Energy Commission, Energy Conservation Act 1To Loan Program to fund a portion of this project. SiteloglQ shall assist the City in obtaining this funding.

3. SiteloglQ shall assist the City in soliciting private placement project funding in the form of a Tax Exempt Municipal Lease, taxable bank funding, or other appropriate finance options.

4. SiteloglQ shall assist the City in obtaining Federal lnflation Reduction Act incentives eligible to the City, as a result of this project.

This LOA shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to principles of conflicts of law.
lf you agree with the provisions set forth in this LOA, kindly sign and date the LOA below and return one fully-executed copy to my attention. Thank you again for providing SiteloglQ with the opportunity to work with the City of Firebaugh on this important initiative.

Acceptance of Letter of Agreement
This agreement is between the Gity of Firebaugh and SiteloglQ, Inc Client: SiteloglQ
Name
Title:

Date:

Name: Eddie Jordan
Title: Vice President
Date:
4 sitelo
Efficiency Powered by sh
Attachment A:

Potential Facility lmprovement, Energy Gonservation and Energy Generation Measures to be considered

1. Solar Generation
5 City of Firebaugh - Clean Energy Project
Presented By: Sitelog lQ's
Central Valle Local Government Ene Team
silslg,gis March 6,2023
O
' .- ,r-Jtrit'F i i:'
a
-,J1f-,.ri:i*...;t:jjErr:.r'liit:j:,ir.ri!,:-l::.-.:t:i.,.-..i:,r:-l:;.;lil::.".::":lt: t r,:::.,:,:1f,':

WHO WE ARE

OU R CALIFORN IA PRESENCE

PROCRAM OVERVIEW

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS & SAVINCSEN ERCY CONSERVATION M EASU RES

PROJ ECTED PROCRAM FI NANCIALS

ROADMAP TO EFFICIENCY
Q&A
logro P r opr ie to ry a nd ac nft dt I tial 2

WHO WE ARE
We deliver world-class energy, water, renewable and infrastructure programs for State anC Lncal tovernments.
t
I
I
I
,
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
a
I
,
t
I
4O0+
Employees
$s eittion
Constructed
ll,O00
Customer Sites
$ aillion Saved in Energy & Ops
U.S. Owned Organization
Single-source of aecountability and responsihility from conception to completion. logro P t opr iete ry a r)d Conf t deF tia I 3

OU R CALI FORN IA PRESENCE
SANIACR.TZ
Our largest client base is in California
Staffed by nearly-l5O energy professionals,engineers, and highly-trained technicians Extensive experience i m plementi ngFedera l, State, a nd Utility prog ra ms for California Local Covernments
:,1'r;L?ril;t.ir", !.,:.,4i:.1; . :-, ; 'l; ,;jr !.,kr*'j;i,jrd:iTf..ji -'.,".:i|. U.f/'!!,ii;ii::1.:, ri'r"" crrToF
cetFonNtr
a
a
a
*
o *\_rA,-
^;{\-
,_ AHADON COUXTY
CALIFORI{IA
o *-?a;w,* tqp- F .ALTF.RNTA
sh (')'#t,/r,
O a -
PROCRAM OVERVIEW . Cumulative positive cash flow
. Desig n/eu ild/o&M . ECA A1a/o Loa n fu n,Ced . CA Covern ment Cod e 4217 Debl Services
During Debt Services
(if financed)
Before Program After Pro.ject is Paid Ofi . Cuara nteed performa nce-based outcome Operoting
Costs
Operoling
Costs Operoting Costs
sitelogio P roprieto ry o nd Confidentiol 5

PRELIMINARY SOLUTIONS & SAVINCS
Solar Photovoltaic
Year I
Electric Savings
($)
30 Year
Net Savings
($)
Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Savings Equivalents
Efficiency Conservation Measures
$ssx $2.2M
homes' energy use for one year S ff 180
115?81065 pounds of coal burned @ ft$
soLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV)
aO
Pro ect Details:

98.2 kW System
178 Sola r Pa nels
Carport Structure &
Roof Mou nted
,d, a *
logro P I a p t i e te ry o ncl aa nfide rt i a I 7

PROJ ECTED PROC RAM FI NANCIALS
Esti mated Project Va lue $+sox
30 Year Net Project Savings $zzu
Year I Annual Utility Savings $sEx
IRA Direct Cash Payment3Oo/o $r3sK
r-)F^^Fi^+^'\' ^ ^'-J /-^^fi'-J^ ^+i- I

P ER FO R MANC E VALI DATI O N
Dd!d Avrrlzblc Frotrr: ldnudry,20iC ic May 20:2 All
Year Sclection
NEEN.awFa1",-,-r=q.:a@-lllL @@@t-i={,:J
L::i-jjjiJ - Electlc cost by slte ($) Eleddc Cost by Month and Year ($) CJrratcn aenier Ciu( Atrs Pliza vear ai!ti !,J1. a:v|/ al!i, :!lt \iatt I i|{ Hru:.clroid,lezardcus tslil aBniii Wi5ieyJa:er lre3inrcni P...

Slia!:

Total
$8.44M
(.rvra Ali! Pl;ra PJrkrig
Go.bei AilLll arn!Er !:;tk
t...-----.-./
lil lltlll
,,.tr .sd .,;r"
llllilllnr
.at;,J ..!"" -c. ^u,r.,i't
-iAnnual Electfic cost ($) Electric Cost by Date ($) 2N27 ?C?I 20r 9 2il8 2Ct 7 2ti6 2ala 74132!l )?41f,
)
:111-1i! I ir,{
.141i., j'i 1c
Electricity Cost Overview

ROADMAP TO EFFICIENCY
.;Yr.rtlJit}j';au$;{er;it!ie*.jil*t-:L:1,::1fi'{j4li'iir:!.&:1r";li::icf}if:.ra*i"d;:'1;'1.ti.tjllj,'; v Challenges/ trends
Y District profile'r ldentify objectives'/' Action plan /' Collect square
footages ofyourfacilities
",' collect and
analyze your utilitydata into an easyto-read SitelQ
Report
" ldentify any existing technical
issues or deferredmalntenance
scope.
r' Sustainability
initiatives
v' Future operating
plans
" Present prellminary model
of measures andcash flow
r' Estimated savings
/ Estimated first
costs
',' Estimated greenhouse gas
emissions
",' Letter of Agreement {LOA) presented
'/ Comprehensive audlt
', Verifo and detail
scope of work
v' APPIY for funding
solution
v ldentify and apply
for rebates, grants
and incentives
" Confirm schedule"/ Confirm scopeof work
/ Review financial
performance
I Finalize funding
solutions
* Post two-week
notice for CA
Covernment Code4217 compliance
v Public hearing
during regularlyscheduled board
meeting
/ Cuaranteed
savings
'/ Cuaranteed
fixedfiirm price
/ Draft program
contract review
/ District Board
public hearing
/ Execute contract"' lmplementation
r' Measurementand
verification
r' Energy
management
services (ElQ)
Preliminary Facility
& lnfrastructure
Analysis
Presentation of
Measu res
Concept
Meeting
Program
Verification
Final Program
Development
Contract &
lmplementation
logro Pr oprietory ar),1 Canfide.tiol 10
sitelogiA Jessica Ritter Local Government Relations M 559.547.1834 E [email protected]
Thank You
FULL PRAJECT PROFORMA CASH FLOW 12
bDc soLr O Fn srtlo[ hllc. O.F.nh.ht a ofisnhg U$e. at w H.ll $ 3J95
$ 1A4,9A7
3 189J63
$ 195,455
$ 205994
$ 211,917
$ 374$ 244,520
$ 263,52I
$ 285,553
$ 3O,AO4
$ 339,470
$ 37.:rA
$ 407,905
$ 4/A:82
$ 492,696$ 541,462
$ 595,912
3 6!0,739
$ 734,244
$ g<3,675
$ 939,87
$ l,o5t4t2
$ 1J70,541
$ v97gn
$ 1.431,454
$ 'ts74t6€
$ 1,725,722
6 t3a66t
$ 2,057 533
z23e
$ 3,395
$ 'r51,592$ 4177
$ 6,292
3 8534
$ 10,921
$ 13,49,
$ 16,145
$ l9,ool
$ 22032$ 252lo
$ 2A,666
$ u,B3
$ 36,142$ .1O227
$ 41,561$ .9;t66
$ 54,O50
$ 44.ezt
93549
I 9f]'3e7
$ l05,5a2f rzr55
$ n9,130
$ 'l25J30
$ ]tr4343
$ 14?;7.4
$ lsl,553
$ 160,93l
$ l70,aao
rar'43s
ctoasAmud Prejcct
silinq6
$ 3J95$ 35399
$ 37F?3
$ 39,77 4
$ 42160
$ 41,690
$ 473n
so2t4
g s3zt
$ 56,42O
$ 59€O5
$ 63,391
$ 67:tgV
$ 71229
$ 75503$ 80,o33
84835
$ 49,925$ 95J21
't01,o40
$ 1O7J02
$ tB,52A
$ !20.3to
$ 127,561
g 1352ll.
$ 143327$ $r9n
$ 161,O42
$ 17OJOs
14O,947
$ 19:t 804
lD6ntiv.6 {lRA} 3096
$ t35,OOO
Solar o&M Seryle &
Ene.gy Darhboard
$
$ 4,400$ 4,532
$ 1,66A
4,AOA
$ 1,952
$ 5,tol
$ s,E4
$ 5,4',1',1
$ 5,574
$ s,741
$
$ 6,O91
$ 6,273
$ 6,462
$ 5,655
$ 6,S55
$ 7,061
$ 7.273
$ 7,491
$ 7,7t5
$ 7,94',1$ a,las
$ a,131$ 8,684$ a,944
$ 9,213
$ 9,1e9
$ 9,774
$ lo,067
$ 10359
3 2O9.cl2
Estihatad Annual
TEML Financc
Paymrnt
$$$$$
$
$
$$
$$
$
$$$$
$$$$
$
$$
$$$$
$
i
Estlmatcd Annu.l
ECAA lo.n P.ymcnt
$ 14,407
$ 28,414$ 26,414
$ 28,8t4
$ 2A,AV$ 2a,A14$ 2a,414$ 2A,Al4
$ 28,814$ 2A,A14$ 28,A14
$ 28,414$ 2e,av$ 28,e14$ 2a,av$ zs,a14$ 2a,514
$ 43,221
$$$
$$$$$
$
$
$
3 514,652
Yrar
o
I
23 567a9
10 n
't2l3
14 t5t617
l8
t9
20 21
22 23
24 26
27 2A30
Totals
s
letst.) SiteloslQ is not a Municipal Financial Advisor and this tool is used to confim ifthe proposed project is Budget Neutral or better in compliancewith qGou. Code 42U.

2.) cash Flow is based on a Pretiminary Analysis using rough order of magnitude budgetary estlmates and other standard assumptions. Final analysis and results may vary.

3.) Scope ofwok includes Solar @ Fire station, Police Depadment & Oreetting usage at vM Hall sitelg,gis
lr th. b.r. cd ofth. projd
k the Fdion ofthe total cost that 6 proposed to be finan.edvia the Ene.g conseruation &5Bta.ceAd 1% loan ir rhe oonion ofihe total colt that B pioposed to be flnanced via Tat Exempt MuniciFI Lease.E the Annual Gross savins iroo the sol.r PV is an 6timated costfor Oper.tion & Maintenance ol the proposd eolar ana, as well as Steloglq3 enerw managenent reilicd da5hboard City oI Firebaugh Public Works Depdrtment
Stdff Report
To:

From:

Ddte:

Mayor Felipe Perez and City Council Members
Michael Molino, Public Works Director
March 6,2023 - CouncilMeeting
WaterAilastewater
The operation department has been working on the following:
l. Day to day operations of treatment plants.

2. Working on Well #12 Rehab
Streets
The Street Department has been working on the following:
l. Repairing Street Signs and install No Truck Parking signs on Clyde Fannon.

2. Filling potholes around town,

3. Assisted contractor with various construction jobsiissues at the new Police Station.

Parks
The Crew has been working on the following:

1. Installing new benches at Maldonado Park - Canopy area.

2. Routine maintenance at parks and city buildings.

3. Getting fields ready for the upcoming baseball season.

Citv Proiects:

L Emmett's Excavation, Inc. has about 80% of the new waterlines and services installed at the Zozayaproject.

2. Emmett's Vattly Excavation will began work on March 20,2023,at the J Street/l0tr' Street project.

FIREBAUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Memo
To:

From:

CG:

Date:

Re:

Honorable Mayor Felipe Perezand Council Members
Salvador Raygoza, Police Chief
Benjamin Gallegos, City Manager
03t02t2023
Staff Report
MONTHLY GRIME ANALYSIS:

During the last two months of 2023, Firebaugh officers took a total of 140 reports that can be classified as crime reports, incident reports and traffic accidents. The majority of reports taken were non-criminal and classified as incident reports. Officers issued 233 traffic citations and we only had 5 traffic accidents within the city limits.

Officers have been busy working traffic enforcement on an over-time basis paid by a grant ftom the California Office of Traffic Safety.

I have attached two graphs on the next page with a crime breakdown forthe last two months. Our city continues to be one of the safest communities in the valley due to the hard work of everyone at the police department and our citizens who report all suspicious activity.

PERSONNEL:

The department's personnelstrength stands at 26, including 13 sworn officers, 5 fulltime dispatcherc, 5 reserve officers and 3 part-time dispatchers.

We had a part-time dispatcher Ana Santos resign her position in January of 2023. Her position was filled by new hire and local resident Angel Cruz who will be sworn in and introduced to council at the March 20, 2023, meeting.

All Other Offenses
CA Traffic Misdemeanors
Vandalism of Property
Driving Under the lnfluence
Aggravated Assault
Simple Assault
Motor Vehicle Theft
lntimidation
Burglary/Breaking & Entering
Trespass of Real
Drug/Narcotic Violations
Jan & Feb 2O23
Breakdown Classification
I Misdemeanor
I Felony
t lnfraction
2 CITY OF FIREBAI,I3H
1133 "P" STREET
FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA 93622-25 47
(559) 659-2043
FAX (559) 659-3412

FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM
DATEI MARCH 01r 2023
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOHN G. BORBOA, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT
Attached is a picture of an AMKUS Combination cutter and spreader extrication tool purchased by the Fire Depaftment Association for $14,306.69. This tool is unique in the sense that it is a complete E-Tool that runs on batteries only without the need for auxiliary hydraulic power units and what can be hundreds of feet of hydraulic hose.

Also pictured are two fire apparatus, also purchased by the Association in the last twelve months. One was acquired from a dealer in Florida and the second was acquired from the City of Fresno.

The large Type 1 will replace our E-550 as a first out and E-550 which is 29 years old will be delegated to reserue status. The smaller four wheel drive will compliment our off road vehicles on vegetation/river bottom fires. As we found out this past year, the river is going to continue to be a extreme problem area. Both of these vehicles have a fair market value today of $130,000.00.

I
I
I
rlir
NY'
,tt
e I
I
{
w
Volunteer Firefighter's Association of Firebaugh
1575 llth,Street
Firebaugh,CA,93622
(559) 659-2073
Cascade Fire Equipment Company
UNITED SECUR]TY BANK
1067 O STREET
FIREBAUGH, CA, 93622
904149t1211
1949

PAY TO THE

ORDER OF
2139.20?3
-- i $ ..14,g06'69
Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred Six and 69/1 DOLLARS
.. i ir:-t::i,ir; d
o
o
I
o
n
o
t
6 t
!
o
{
I
o
g
i4t; :"1i-l
Company
Medford, 1
lNV957
Volunteer Association of Fi
Cascade Equipment pany
GeneralOperating I
Volunteer Fireflghter's Association of Firebaugh
Cascade Fire Equipment ComPanY
One (1)
2t28t2023
ICTT'1618 E-Tool Combi Tool with B
City of Firebaugh on SO10180
2t28t2023
One (1)Amkus |CT716LB E-Tool Combi'Toolwith B
Charged to City of Firebaugh qn SO10180 '
illilltillllll lllll
(-_-\ tl
1949
14,306.69
14,306.69
1949
14,306.69
*
GeneralOperating lNV957
1 008i 1
14,306.69
*

← All documents from this meeting