1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 February 08, 2022
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.
How to Participate
The Sacramento County Health Order dated January 6, 2022 has ordered that all in-person council and commission public meetings be suspended, and that those meetings be conducted virtually.The next page of the agenda provides details describing how to participate in this meeting via Zoom.
How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides several ways to watch a City Council meeting:
Online On TV
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14
Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda
2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Council Chambers
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, February 08, 2022 6:30 PM
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
In association with the Governor’s proclamation of a State of Emergency due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency and Assembly Bill 361, the Sacramento County Health Order dated January 6, 2022 has ordered that all in-person council and commission public meetings be suspended, and that those meetings be conducted virtually.
Join the meeting by Zoom online: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85349631082 To make a public comment using the Zoom online platform, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. Please make sure to enable audio controls once access has been given by the City Clerk to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Join the meeting by Zoom telephone: Dial +1 408 638 0968 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 646 876 9923 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 853 4963 1082
To make a public comment by phone, please press *9 to raise your hand. Please make sure to enable audio controls once access has been given by the City Clerk to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Verbal comments via virtual meeting must adhere to the principles of the three-minute speaking time permitted for public comment at City Council meetings.
CALL TO ORDER
3 ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers: Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the i tem will be continued to a future Council Meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City C ouncil is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. City Manager's Financial Report Including ACFR Findings for Fiscal Year 2021 and the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Second Quarter Financial Report
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
2. Approval of January 11, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes
3. Approval of January 25, 2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Ordinance No. 1323 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approvement Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California LLC relative to the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project (Seconding Reading and Adoption)
5. Resolution No. 10792 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288S21 for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project
6. Resolution No. 10793 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project and Appropriation of Funds
7. Resolution No. 10794 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Condition Investigation and Rehabilitation Analysis
8. Resolution No. 10795 – A Resolution Revising the Boundary of the Pilot Residential Permit Parking Program in the Historic District
9. Resolution No. 10796 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Doug VeerKamp General Engineering Inc. for Construction of the 405 Natoma Station Drive Exterior ADA Upgrades and Appropriation of Funds
4 10. Resolution No. 10797 – A Resolution of the City Council Making Findings to Continue Teleconferencing Options for Public Meetings Under AB 361
11. Resolution No. 10798 - A Resolution Authorizing an Additional Appropriation in the Police Department Operating Budget for the Purchase of Police Equipment PUBLIC HEARING:
12. Public Hearing No. 4 Under the California Voting Rights Act Regarding the Composition of the City’s Voting Districts Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010 CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please raise your hand. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.
NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.
As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using p rofanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.
PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, Calif ornia during normal business hours.
Folsom City Council
Staff Reoort
-*'ft fl"6i fllu.
MEETING DATE: 21812022
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: City Manager's Financial Report Including ACFR Findings for Fiscal Year 2021 and the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Second Quarter Financial Report
F'ROM: Finance Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2021,-22 Second Quarter Financial Report.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.
The Finance Director will present the audited City of Folsom Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) findings, for the year ended June 30, 2021, during the February 8ft Council Meeting.
The Quarterly Financial Report for the second quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 is an analysis of the unaudited financial status of the City's major funds, covering the six-month period from July 2021through December 2021. Please refer to the Appendices of the report for detailed schedules of the City's key funds for the period ended December 3I,2021.
I
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
POLICY / RULE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.
Section 3.02.050 (b) of the Folsom Municipal Code states ".... within 30 days after the end of each quarter during the fiscal year, and more often if required by the City Council, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a financial and management report."
ANALYSIS
Economic Update:
As of December 202I, unemployment was 5.0o/o and 4.8% in California and Sacramento County respectively and in Folsom, the unemployment rate was 2.8%. As a comparison, in December 2020, the unemployment rates were 9 J% in California, 83% in Sacramento County and 4.9%o in Folsom. A comparison of home sales during the second quarter of FY 2021-22 and FY 2020-21shows the number of homes sold decreased by 139 or 23.76%. The average median sales price through the second quarter of FY 2021-22 was $730,000 which is an increase of 19.45% over FY 2020-21.
General Fund:
Fiscal Year 2021-22 is cunently projected to end the year with a General Fund unassigned fund balance of $20.75 million. As a comparison, the unassigned fund balance in FY 2020-21 was $19.20 million (audited). The unassigned fund balance as a percentage of expenditures is projected at2l.02% for FY 2021-22 and for FY 2020-21, it was 21.38%. Although the total unassigned fund balance is increasing, as a percentage of expenditures it is expected to decrease.
Fiscal Year202I-22totalprojected revenues of $100.22 million is an increase of $4.64 million, or 4.85o/o over the prior fiscal year, and a projected increase of $5.24 million, or 5.48Yo over FY 202I-22 budgeted revenues of $94.98 million. The increase is seen mostly in charges for services and sales tax and is due to continued recovery from the COVID-I9 related impacts.
Property tax received in the first half of the fiscal year was $13.40 million and compared to the prior fiscal year is an increase of $ 1 .08 million or 8 .8 1 %. The current proj ection is for property tax to end the fiscal year with a slight increase of $500,000 over the budgeted amount of $32.49 million, which would be an increase of $1.74 million from FY 2020-21 or 5.56Yo.
Sales tax is projected to end the fiscal year at $26.50 million, an increase of $ 1 .95 million over the budgeted amount of $24.55 million or 7.93oh. This is due to a better than expected recovery from the impacts of COVID-19. However, when compared to the results for FY 2020-21 sales tax revenues of $25.85 million, this is only a 2.52% increase year over year. 2
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Through the second quarter, charges for services were $6.83 million and the current projection for the end of FY 2021-22 is $13.30 million. The projection of $13.30 million is an increase from the $9.90 million budgeted and a decrease from the $14.17 million received in the prior year. The increase over the budgeted amount is mostly related to better than expected Parks and Recreation revenues, up $1.60 million, due to increased program activity after recovering from the impacts of COVID-19. Also, development charges are projected to be up $280,000 overthe budgeted amount and charges inPolice and Fire are up $631,000. Charges inthe Public Safety Departments are estimated reimbursements from the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for wildfire strike teams. The decrease in charges for services when compared to the prior fiscal year is in development charges of approximately $1.13 million, related to a slowing of engineering fee revenue related to the Plan Area development compared to the prior year and a decrease in Fire Department charges related to prior year reimbursements from CaIOES of approximately $700,000 which should also be reflected in a reduction in overtime expenses when compared to the prior fiscal year.
Fiscal Year 202I-22 total projected General Fund expenditures are $98.73 million, $3.74 million (3.94%) more than the appropriated amount of $94.98 million. The projected expenditure total includes increases in salaries and benefits of $1.39 million, an increase in contractsof$l.22millionandanincreaseincapitaloutlayof$533,000. Theprojectedincrease in salaries is primarily in the Police Department ($128,000) and the Fire Department ($1.95 million) and is mostly due to overtime. This will be partially offset by reimbursements from CaIOES for overtime due to wildfires (Police $300,000, Fire $750,000). A salary increases in Parks and Recreation, $39,000, is mainly due to increased temporary salaries as programs reopened from closures due to the pandemic. The increase to capital outlay is a cost carry over for renovations at the Aquatic Center.
Utility Enterprise Funds
All three Utility Operating Funds are projected to end the fiscal year with operating revenues exceeding operating expenses. Net assets in all three funds are projected to decrease once capital expenses are included. In the case of Water and Wastewater, the capital outlay is for capital projects and in Solid Waste, it is the purchase of replacement vehicles.
A year over year comparison of the fiscal year-end projection of expenses and revenues in the combined operating and capital funds shows charges for service revenues in Water are currently projected to decrease by $379,000 (2.08%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $1.5 million (1094%). The increase in operating expenses is mostly seen in maintenance and operations costs. Wastewater Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $ 150,000 (1.77%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $441,000 (8.71%). The increase in expense in Wastewater is seen mostly in supplies. Solid Waste Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $2.48 million (16.34%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $1.73 million (12.46%).
Increases in expenses are mainly due to employee and contract costs and the increase in the projected revenues is due to the recent increase in service rates. The increase in expenses and aJ
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
revenues in Solid Waste are both directly attributable to the regulations regarding food waste and the change in recyclables.
Expenses for capital improvements are currently projected to increase across all three enterprise funds when compared to the prior year. The increase is due to budgeted project and vehicle replacement costs.
Submitted,
Tamagni
Finance Director/CFO
V-
Elaine Andersen
City Manager
4
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
FOLSONI
C ITY O F
OISTINCTIVE !Y NATURE
City of Folsom
Quarterly Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Second Quarter
February 812022
Prepared by the Office of Management and Budget
Financial Analysis and Reporting Division
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Table of Contents
Section
Introduction.......
Page No
Executive Summary
Financial Results
a) General Fund......
b) Enterprise Funds
c) Other Funds......
Risk Management ...........
Lighting and Landscape Districts
Plan Area Impact Fees........
Appendix
Combined General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement 8 General Fund Departmental Expenditure Summary
I
1 ,2
.5
7 7
7 7
Housing Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement
Lighting and Landscaping District Statement
Water Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Wastewater Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Solid Waste Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
,,9
10 l1
t4
t5
l6
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Second Quarter Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2021-22 F ()Lg(}nfi
0t!tttcrrvt at {ar0nr
Introduction
This financial report provides an overview ofthe City's unaudited financial position through the second quarter offiscal year (FY) 2021-22 (October l,202l,through December 31, 2021) for (1) the General Fund, (2) Housing Special Revenue Fund and L&L Districts, (3) the major enterprise operating funds, and (4) the Risk Management Internal Service Fund.
Notable cumulative second quarter to second quarter and budget to actual comparisons are included in this report in addition to year-end projections.
Executive Summa
Through the first two quarters of FY 2021-22, the COVID- l9 public health emergency has relaxed some restrictions, but it has continued to cause uncertainty in the economy. Restrictions that effected Parks and Recreation programming revenues have become less restrictive compared to a year ago and the department has found ways to provide programming while continuing to follow health guidelines. Parks and Recreation programming revenues are now projected to end FY 2021-22 with an inoease of $1.60 million when compared to the budget and $750,000 when compared to the prior fiscal year. The City has received $4.19 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding of which approximately $2.2 has been approved to be used for public safety, facilities and health and welfare, within the category of Provision of Government Services. The total projected year-end General Fund revenues are $ 100.22 million and projected expenditures are $98.73 million.
We project the General Fund's unassigned fund balance will increase from $ 19.20 million to $20.75 million at the fiscal year end. Below is a chart of the unassigned fund balance over the last ten years and displays the projected change from FY 2020-21 to FY 2021-22.
Unassigned General Fund Balance
$24,000,000
$22,000,000
$20,000,000
$ I 8,000,000
$ I 6,000,000
$ l 4,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
30.00o/o
25.00%
20.00o/o
15.00o/o
10.00%
5.00o/o
0.00%
FY13
Actual
FY14
Actual
FY15
Actual
FY16
Actual
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY2O
Actual
FY21
Actual
FY22
Projected
$20,754,333
$t3,776,t14
21.02o/o
14.44o/o
$5,020,885
7.70 $19,200,703
21.380hs17,397,043
20.O9o/o$15,529,576
19.9o/o
I
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
General Fund: Operating Revenues
The following table includes cumulative revenue comparisons through the second quarter of FY 2020-21 andFY 2021- 22 and a revenue budget comparison for FY 2021-22 with year-end projections.
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Charges for Services
License. Permits & VLF
Transfers In
All Other
Subtotal Rerenue
CARES Act / ARPA
Total Rewnuc
$ 30,930,,141
1,007,649
s 34,699,982
2,195,s00
$ 92,787,54r
2,19s,s00
$ 98.027,128
2,r95,500
FY20-21 Actual
Dec.31,2020
$ 12,314,3'10
8,208,867
352,936
4"942.132
2,233.435
2,102,178
776.523
Fl'21-22 Actual
Dec,3l,202l
$ 13,398,9s2
8,690,268
8t6,724
6.832,s26
2,0s3,12s
r,974,390
933,996
FY2t-22
Bu@et
32,491,949
24,551,790
2,000,000
9.893,940
I 1,91 I,184
8,393, l 78
3,545,500
w2t-22
Projected
s 32,99r,949
26,498,472
2,000,000
13,299,97s
I 1,960,984
7,730,248
3.545,500
Orrcr/flnder
Budget
$ s00,000
t,946.682
3"406.035
49,800
(662,930)
o/" of
Budget
102Yo
l08yo
lO0Yo
134Yo
100Vo
9204
t000
$
$ 5,2q587 105.65v"
$ 31.938.090 $ 36.895.482 $ 94.983.M1 S t0f.22L628 $ 5.239.587 t05.520/o General Fund operating revenues through the second quarter are $36.90 million, and 15.52yo above the same period in FY 2020-21 . Revenues are at 38.84oh of the budget through the second quarter of the current year, primarily due to the timing associated with receiving some of the larger revenue sources. For instance, property tax is the largest General Fund revenue source, but funding is received in two installments. The second installment will be received during the fourth quarter ofthe fiscal year.
The following is an explanation of the notable vanances . Property tax revenues exceeded last year's cumulative second quarter by 8.81% or $1,085,000. The number of honre sales from July through December was 446 and a decrease from the prior year of 139 sales (23.76%).
The median sales price has increased by approxim alely 19 .45o/o. The property tax revenue proj ection for Fiscal Year 2021-22year-end is $500,000 greater than the budgeted amount of $32.49 million, which would exceed the prior year by S1.74 million or 5.560/o.
. Sales tax revenues also exceeded last year's cumulative second quarter by 5.86% or $481,000. During the time frame of July through September the categories of construction, business to business and the countywide pool show a decrease, all other categories show an increase when compared to the same quafter in the prior year. The categories of apparel stores and restaurants show increases due to closures in the prior year that caused a deep decline. Compared to December 2020, business are able to be open however some businesses are still finding it difficult to hire enough staff to be open with hours similar to pre-pandemic.
Based on the latest sales tax forecast, sales tax is trending to end the year slightly above the budget at $26.50 million, an increase from the prior year of 565 1,000 or 2.520 . Below is a graph showing sales tax revenue for the cunent fiscal year and the past five fiscal years. )
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Sales Tax
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,0000000
10,000,000
5,000,000
721,293
Actual
FY17
s22,294,827
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
$22,616,404
Actual
FY2O
Actual
FY21
Budget
FY22
Projection
FY22
. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections are at $817,000 through the second quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at the budgeted amount of $2 million, an increase of $642,500, 47.32% when compared to the FY 2021 amount The increase is attributed to the continued reduction of travel restrictions and the desire to travel.
. Charges for services, including Building and Engineering fees, Parks and Recreation user fees, and Ambulance fees are at $6.8 million through the second quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at $13.30 million, Thecurentprojectionis$86g,000lessthantheprioryearamountof$14.17million. TherevenuesfromParks and Recreation fees through the second quarter have begun to increase due to the programs resuming. The Parks and Recreation charges through the second quarter were $1.85 million and a comparison to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year shows an increase of $ I .44 million. Ambulance fees through the second quarter were $ 1.76 million and compared to the prior fiscal year this is an increase of $81,000 or 4.83Yo, The projection for Ambulance Fees at fiscal year-end is $3.80 million, which will be a decrease from the prior year of $489,000 or ll.4lo/o. Community Development charges are at5234 million through the second quarter and are curently projected to end the fiscal year at $3.l7 million. Compared to the prior fiscal year this would be a decrease of $ I . l3 million or 26.24Yu The projected decrease in Community Development charges is due to a decrease in engineering activity, mostly in the plan area, through the second quarter. Activity may resume the second halfofthe fiscal year.
. License and permit fees and Vehicle License Fees (VLF) quarter to quarter decreased $180,000 and are projected to end the fiscal year at $11.96 million which would be an increase of $49,800 compared to the budget and a decrease of $654,070 when compared to the prior year. The year over year decrease is due to a projected decrease in building permit activity as well as a decrease in business certificates due to an approved business certificate suspension for small business in the cunent fiscal year. . Other revenues increased 20.28% or $ I 57,000, over the second quarter FY 2020-21 .
General Fund: Department Operating Expenditures
The following table includes cumulative second quarter actual expenditure comparisons for FY 2020-21 andFY 2021- 22 and an expenditure budget-to-actual comparison for FY 2021-22.
J
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Salaries
Benefits
o&M
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
FY20-21 Actual
Dec.31,2020
$ 19,836,842
13,288,747
9,m,354
693,895
494,381
FY2l-22 Actuil
Dec.3l,2021
$ 20,766,12s
13,100,700
l 1,586 631
t,tt7,46l
201,686
Fr{2t42
BuQet
s 40,271,7s7
27,s69,67t
23,595,724
2,762,740
783,t49
Yr2t-22
Projected
42,374,057
26,855,771
25,416,28t
3,296,840
783,149
(her/thder
Bu{et
$ 2,roz3oo
(713,900)
1,820,5s7
534100
o/o oI
Bu@et
105.2%
97.4o/o
r07.7%
l19.3o/o
100.0%
$
Overall, cumulative second quarter General Fund expenditures increased 7.69% compared to the prior year. This is in part due to the increased appropriation from the ARPA funding and an increase in temporary salaries in Parks and Recreation due to programs resuming. General Fund expenditures are coming in at 49 .24% percent of the budget through the second quarter of FY 2021-22. The projection for the end of the fiscal year is for expenditures to be at $98.73 million which would be $3.74 million more than the budgeted amount or 103.94% of budget. The projected increase to expenditures is primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits, contracts and capital outlay. The increase in salaries and benefits will be partially offset by reimbursements for wildfire strike teams.
The table below shows a comparison for FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 for each General Fund Department.
The following is an explanation of the department specific variances of year-end projections as compared to the budget:
. Community Development department is projected to end the fiscal year $1.80 million (31.94%) over the budgeted amount, which is mostly due to anticipated increases in contract costs that are mostly offset by increased revenues.
. Fire department is projected to end the fiscal year $2.69 million (11.96%) over the budgeted amount, which is mainly seen in overtime costs, vehicle maintenance and capital outlay. Overtime costs have been impacted by employees out after an exposure to COVID-I9, wildfire strike teams and retirements. Capital outlay costs are due to the purchase of an additional two ambulances and will depend on if those ambulances are completed during the current fiscal year. Due to shortages of parts and computer chips, these costs may not materialize until next fiscal year.
. Parks and Recreation department is projected to end the fiscal year $285,000 (1.82%) over the budgeted amount, which is mostly in capital outlay costs of approximately $140,000 for the repairs to the Community Center roof which was appropriated in prior fiscal year and expended in the curent fiscal year. Services and 4 City Council
City Manager
City Clerk
City Attomey
Mgmt &Budget
Human Resources
Police
Fire
Community Dev
Parks & Recreation
Library
Public Works
Non-Deptartmental
FY20Al Actual
Dec. 31,2020
$ 50,492
579,853
372,252
478,075
2,689,696
304,217
11,695,493
11,837,465
3,126,315
6,333,217
871,362
3,416,087
1,676,694
FV2lA2 Actual
Dec.3l,2021
$ 52,751
562,411
294,914
482,287
2,570,132
329,169
12,174,1&
12,725,060
3,630,703
7,3W,626
816,994
3,897,290
2,526,IU
YY2t-22
BuQet
$ 116,14l
1,303,034
596,133
1,058,985
5,399,729
846,494
25,313,486
22,526,257
5,629,217
15,688,345
l,g3o,3g7
9,355,071
6,219,753
w2l-22
Projectcd
$ 106,14l
1,226,034
589,633
977,485
5,o7g,l2g
736,494
25,362,986
25,219,757
7,427,017
l5,g73,lu
1,761,397
g,o4g,17l
6,219,753
0wr/thder
BuQet
$ (l0,0oo)
Q7,n0)
(6,500)
(81,500)
(321,ffi})
(l 10,000)
49,500
2,693,500
l,7g7,goo
284,757
(16q000)
(306e00)
Vo oI
BuQet
91.4o/o
94.1%
98.9%
92.3%
94.0o/o
87.0o/o
100.2%
l12.0o/o
13t.9%
101.8%
91.2o/o
96.3o/o
100.0%
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
supplies is projected to exceed the appropriated amount by approximately $241 ,800 mainly due to supply costs increasing.
Overall General Fund departments' expenditures are trending at budget (in line with the 50oh expectalion) at this point in the fiscal year.
Enterprise Funds:
Water Fund
The Water Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the following funds: Water Impact, Water Operating, Water Capital and Water Meters.
The table below includes cumulative second quarter actual revenue and expense comparisons for FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 and a budget to actual comparison for FY 2021-22 for the Water Operating Fund.
The Water Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $17.87 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out and debt service are projected to end the year at $ 15.40 million, or 99.2%o of budget. This reduction from budgeted amounts is mostly due to savings from budgeted contracts not anticipated to be fully needed this fiscal year. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $4.76 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $18.73 million.
Wastewater Fund
The Wastewater Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Wastewater and Wastewater Capital Funds.
ProgramRevenues $ 9,882,111 $ 8,655,286 $ 17,865,000 $ 17,865,000 $ Capital E4enses 29.2o/o
$
$
100.0%
Owr/thder
Budget
99.8o/o
99.8o/o
98.4o/o
100.0%
100.0%
99.2%
(5,858)
(4,142)
(l 13,100)
5,451,027
955,871
$ 5,669,001
5 728,606
$ 15,526,362
$ 16,375,793
$ 15,403,262
g 4,775,793
$ (123,100)
$ (11,600,000)
I'lI20-21Actual
Dec.3l,2020
1,500,176
1,115,225
2,381,2N
M4,303
10,123
Ft2l42 Actual
Dec.3l,202l
1,397,814
l,o3l,73g
2,788,886
450,563
nt2t-22
Bu@et
3,215,801
2,273,759
7,o3g,ol g
l,l05,goo
1,892,995
nt2l-22
Projected
3,209,943
2,269,616
6,gu,glg
1,105,900
l,gg2,gg5
o/o ol
Buftet
Salaries
Benefits
Operating Eryenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
5
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
ProgramRevenues $ 4,228,558 $ 5,000,319 $ 8,525,154 $ 8,625,154 $ 100,000 101.17% 3,476,123Capital Erpenses
92.60%5,506,880
20.58o/o
$
$
98.680/o
98.68%
81.74%
100.00%
$ 2,18q815
$ 101,466
$ 2,166,813
$ 977,688
$ 5,946,880
$ 16,891,123
$ (,l4o,ooo)
$ (13,415,000)
F"Y20-21Actual
Dec.3l,2020
791,964
597,990
462,928
327,933
FY2l-22 Actual
Dcc. 31,2021
765,356
598,465
462,670
340,322
nt2b22
Budget
1,733,916
1,296,782
2,lgl,o84
725,198
w2t-22
Projected
l,7lo,g32
\n9,666
l,7gl,o84
725,198
Orcr/Ih&r
Bu{et
Q2,884)
(l7,lto
(400,000)
Vo oI
Budget
Salaries
Benefits
Operating Eryenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
The Wastewater Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $8.63 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $5.51 million, or 92.6% of budget. This reduction from budgeted amounts is mostly due to savings in supply and maintenance costs. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $3.48 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $16.34 million.
Solid Waste Fund
The Solid Waste Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital.
The Solid Waste Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $17.69 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $15.64 million, or l0l.7Yo of budget. The fund is currently projected to be slightly over budget mainly due to the increase in contract costs related to recycling and organics changes.
Total expenditures for capital outlay costs are estimated to be $4.09 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $4.54 million.
6 Revenues $ 7,315,838 $ 10,191,474 $ 16,241,410 $ 17,691,410 $ 1,450,000 1089% 103.8%Capital Bpenses
$
$
Salaries
Benefits
Operating E>penses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
94.2%
94.2%
109.8o/o
100.0%
0.0%
r01.7%$ 6,043,708
$ 988,952
$ 6,662,137
$ 799,495
$ 15,377,430
$ 3,943,709
$ 15,635,330
$ 4,093,709
257,900
150,000
mt20Al Actual
Dec,31,2020
1,596,706
1,255,458
2,492,133
709,411
rY2l-22lrcnt l
Dec.3l,202l
1,529,619
1,334,508
2,969,533
828,477
w2t-22
BuQet
3,971,924
3,069,920
6,693,409
1,742,377
w2t-22
Projected
3,&8,717
2,992,927
7,351,309
1,742,377
(hpr/Lh&r
BuQet
Q23,107)
(176,893)
657,900
Vo of
Buftet
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
Other Funds
City Housing Fund
The City Housing Fund as of December 31,2021had a cash balance of $9,533,357. The City Council had also previously approved housing project loans in an amount up to $3.5 million for the Scholar Way project of which $2,75 million has now been expended.
Risk Management Internal Service Fund
The Risk Management Fund captures the activity associated with employee and retiree health, dental and vision insurance, workers' compensation, and liability insurance expense.
As of December 31, 2021,the City has paid $3.65 million for health, vision, and dental insurance for active employees and $2.31 million for retired employees and $1.21 million for workers' compensation. Liability insurance payments were $2.44 million. The total expenditures for FY 2022 are projected at$19.97 million, which is an increase from the prior fiscal year of $326,000, which is rnostly seen in health and liability costs.
The projected ending unrestricted net position is $7.13 million, a $248,000 increase from FY 2020-21.
Lighting and Landscape Funds
There are 29 Lighting and Landscape (L&L) Districts in the City of Folsom. Each District has its own budget and maintenance requirements to maintain various types of assets ranging from shrub beds, mini parks, walls, fences, monument signs, streetlights, bollards, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, artwork, a waterfall, walkways/trails, open space, trees, and electrical services.
Some activities that have taken place in the L&L's during this time period include District Proiect Date Cost
Broadstone 1,2 &4 lands cap e Lisht Rep lacement October $1,901 Willow Creek Estates
South Median Renovation as S. kxington October $3,570
Briggs Ranch Fence Replacement December $2,58s
los Cerros
landscape Light Replacement and
Replanting October $1,581
Plan Area Impact Fees
Total Plan Area Impact Fees received through the 2nd Quarter of FY 2022 was $7.12 million. In July 202l,the City made the final payment on the Corporation Yard property that is just south of the Plan Area. 7
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX A
City of F'olsom, California
Combined General Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 3 l, 2021
F\ 2021
As of
t2l3t/2020
w 2022
As of
ASSETS
Ctrh md Invcstments
lntcryovcmmenhl/Statc
Intcrfund Reccivable/ Advdccs/Loes
Fixcd Assets (less AccDep)
Inventory
Prcpaid ltems
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Accounts Pa!"blc md Accrucd liabilitics
Wagcs Payablc
Acorucd Compensatcd Absenccs
Duc to Other Funds
Intcrfund Advmces / Loms
Dcfcrrcd rev/ Roirndablc Dcposils
Dcbt Serice/Curcnt Note Pa)'able
Dcbt Seryice/Long Tem Notc Palable
Rcscrvcd for AdvuccsBudgotcd Prcjccb
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND BALANCE
Rc$ned for Inventory ud Prcpaids
Re$ryed forencumbruces
UnrcseNed (deficit)
REVENUES:
Taaesl
Propcrt),
Sales And Usc
Tmsient Occupecy
Rcal Propeny Tmsfer
Fmchisc Fcos
Otlrcr
Liccnscs And Pemits
Intcrgovemmental
Charges For Curcnt Senices
Fincs And Forfeiturcs
Intcrest
Nliscellmsous
Opcrating Tmsfcts Itr
273,483
485,048
636,158
4,824
$ I 3,365,6?9
t,247
641,750
t4,767,201
5,018,860
3,521,114
208,847
2,014,861
1,t66,223
4,942,132
6t,949
92,E05
4t2,922
$
43,43t,219
( r 1,493,129)
t5,69't,621
4,204,493
(758,530)
(550,325)
$ 2,895,637
20,4t2.576
t,241
267,5s5
640,982
r,5?0,641
9.380,682
t3,398,952
8,690,268
8t6,724
408,695
1,878,600
2,370,025
6.832,526
26,807
49,946
448,548
2E,328.683
1,378,534
I,485,377
F\ 2021
450,E04
4,E24
3t,253,436
25,E46,9E5
1,357.550
799,t93
738,256
710,605
4,187,836
I,434,867
14.168.865
125,4t3
69,5 l9
$
w 2022
BUDGET
FY22 Forccst
As of
32,991,949
26,498,4'12
2,000,000
685,000
75 1,800
1,000,000
3,259,500
r0,896,964
13,299,91s
135,300
230,000
143,400
1,496,530
VARIANCE
Foreet vs Budget
VARIANCE
Acutal vs Budgct
7.332,597
(3,042,973)
8.536.021
4.249,279
2.022,136 5,440,43t 3,393,496
t0,562,710
?58,530
550,325
2,895.641
455,629
1,813,094
t9.200,104
TOTAL LIABILITIFf & FUND BALANCE t4,767,201
$ 12,3t4.370
8,208,861
352,936
$ 32,491,949
24,55 t,790
2,000,000
6E5,000
751,800
1,000,000
3,265,'100
10,840,984
9,893,940
135,300
230,000
143,400
8,393,178
500,000
t,946,682
(6,200)
56,000
3,406,035
t020/0
t08%
to00/o
100%
|t0%
t00%
t00%
t0tyo
t340/o
r000/o
103.90/o
(t9 ,092,997\
(15,861,522)
(t,t83,2761
(685,000)
(75 1,800)
(591,305)
(1,387,100)
(8,470,959)
(3,061,4r4)
(108,493)
(180,054)
(294,852\
4t%
35%
4t%
0%
4t%
s80/o
69%
60%
39%
49%
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
2,102,178
3 I,938,090
6,039,354
23,428,0E5
3,416,0E1
3,t26,3ts
5,144,684
t,616,694
6,126,624
24,175.2t9
3,897.290
3,630,703
6,4t6.665
2,526,t02
94,983,041
94,983,041
Curcnt Ope6tingl
GcncEl Covcmment
Public Safeq
Public Wals dd Facilities
Comhunity Seniccs
Culturc md Recreation
Non-Dcparhncntal
Opemting TrdsfeF Out
'i.tl
iJ
$
$I 1,785,16I
47.t03.373
7,044,507
6,825,605
13.19E.419
3,855,48',1
(9,871,t2t) 5.11r,805
(455,629\
t3,986,204
47,561,942
8,35s,071
5,629,21'l
13,230.854
6,2t9,7 53
t3,2t3,504
50.311142
8,048,171
"t,42'1,0t7
13,506,21 I
6,2t9,753
(772,700)
2,149,500
(306,900)
|,197,800
275,357
94%
t06%
96%
132%
102%
1000/"
440/o
5t%
470/o
64%
480/0
4to/.
7,859,580
23,3E6.123
4,451,181
1,998,5 14
6,814,189
3,693,651
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE, JULY 1
FUND BALANCE
2t,469,426
2t,469,426
(640,982)NONSPENDABLE FUND BALANCE
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
COMMTTTED FUND BALANCE
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE
8 UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
(640,982)
704 $ 20,828,444
(640,982)
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX B
City of Folsom, California
Expenditure Summary - General Fund Departrnents
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
FY 2021
As of
t2/3U2020
FY 2022
As of
t2131/2021
FY 2021
ACTUAL
FY22 Forecmt
As of
l2/31/2021
VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budset
s
VARIANCE
Actual vs. BudgetFY 2022
BUDGET
I 16,141
1,303,034
596,t33
s,399,728
1,058,985
846,494
25,3t3,486
22,526,257
5,629,2t7
15,688,345
1,930,397
8,355,07 t
9t.39%
94.09o/o
98.9tv"
94.04yo
92.30yo
87.Qlo/o
t00.200/"
ll1.96o/o
131.940/0
t0l.82yo
91.25o/"
96.330/"
$ o/o
45%
43%
49%
48Yo
46Yo
39%
48o/o
54o/o
640/o
47o/o
42Yo
47Yo
EXPENDITURES:
City Comcil
City Mmager
City Clerk
Office of Mgrnt & Budget
City Attomey
Hmm Resouces
Police
Fire
Colmuity Development
Puks & Recreation
Library
Public Works
Other
Non Departsnmtal
Opuating Trmsfen Out
TOTAL EXPENDITIJRES:
s$ s0,492
579,853
11) ) \7
2,689,696
478,075
304,217
11,695,493
11,837,465
3,126,315
6,333,2t7
871,362
3,4t6,087
1,676,694
52,751
562,411
294,914
2,570,132
482,287
329,t69
12,t74,164
12,t26,060
3,630,703
7,309,625
816,994
3,897,290
104,t52
1,t82339
647,613
5,000,741
953,138
622,t82
23,564,627
23,77t,961
6,825,605
14,401,303
1,838,898
7,044,507
3,8s5,487
106,141
t,226,034
589,633
s,078,128
977,485
736,494
25,362,986
2s,219,757
7,427,0t7
1s,973,102
1,761,397
8,048,171
(r0,000)
(77,000\
(6,500)
(321,600)
(8 1,s00)
(l 10,000)
49,500
2,693,500
t,797,800
284,757
(169,000)
(306,900)
(63,390)
(740,623)
(30 I,2 l9)
(2,829,s96)
(576,698)
(st7,325)
(t3,139,322)
(10,400,197)
(1,998,5 r4)
(8,378,720)
(l,l 13,403)
(4,457,781)
$ $ $ $ $
$ 43.431219 $ 46-772-603 $ 89.812_5s2
6,2t9,7s3 6,219,7s3 100.000/o (3,693,651) 41o/"
s 94,983,041 $ 98,726,098 $ 3,743,0s7 103.940/. $ (48,210,438) 49yo 2,526,102
9
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX C
City of Folsom, California
Housing Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31, 2021
REVENUES:
Tues
Intergovernmental
Chages for Cunent Seruices
Impact Fee Revenue
Interest Revenue
Other Revenue
Opemting Trmsfers In
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
Salary & Benefits
Seruices & Supplies
Contracts
Insunnce
Other Operating Expenses
Capital Outlay
Extroudinary Loss on Dissolution ofRDAs
Operating Tresfers Out
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE, JULY 1
FI]ND BALANCE
FY 2022
As of
t2t3t/2021
FY 2021
ACTUAL
Fv 2022
BUDGET
FY22 Forerct VARIANCE VARIANCE
As of Fore€st vs Budget Actual vs Budget
t2/3t/202t -----T------ % -----5 %
$
35,659
2,324,907
tt4,4't I
$
2,'7',?5,254
4,800
$ 28,850,170
(2,261,87s)
5t,446
4,'733,226
344,537
2,456,t21
20,000
250,000
50,000
55,385
375,385
36,000
4,600,000
230,000
2,810,000
10,300
2,045,700
730
3t,213,430
(3t,2t3,430)
16,000
4,350,000
180,000
(55,38s)
2,500,000
(30,000)
I 5,659
2,0'14,90',7
64,4'7 t
(ss,385)
(2,46s,2_s4)
35,500
180%
1840%
460%
0%
t78%
930%
229o/o
0%
7 5 1296% 659%
797%
$ $ $ $
(3 17,s60) 3,891,979
167 '730 '75t
3 10,000
40,300
350,300
25.085
29,167,'730
$ 29,192,815
Q9,t92,815)
3,564,5'73
16,418
29,t6'1,',130
(2,26r,875)
906%
26%
895%
t2%
805o/o
$
NONSPENDABLE FUND BALANCE
RESTRICTED TUND BALANCE
COMMITTED FUND BALANCE
ASSIGNED TUND BALANCE
UNRESTRICTED TUND EALANCE (DEFICIT) $ $$
10
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
Fund 204
Los Cerros
182
524
6,410
1,523
1 5,1 16
225
1,82s
Briggs
Ranch
Natoma
Station
Cobble Hills
Reflect
Sierra
Estates
tat
Natoma
Valley
792
2,082
2,209
15,392
205 Fund 207 Fund 208 Fund 209 Fund Fund 212 Fund 213 Fund 214 Fund 231 Folsom Broadstone Hannaford
Cross
Lake Natome
ShoresUnit3 Broadstone
Revenues:
Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:
Communications
Utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
9,60s
3,782
24,827
4,914
39,799
8,s0 r
47,481
1,864
I 1,101
56 t22
714
350
15,390
951
93,809
t4,078
699
2,492
1,294
5,463
465
1,316
2,013
1,065
2,910
1,187
113
7,392
2,638
t7,901
3,262
878
636
t,202
183 1,743 7l
96 134
336
182
8t
Total Revenue $ 706 $ 183 S 1,743 $ 167 $ t78 $
3,541
9sl $ 3,s41 $ s20 $ 113$ 263$ 792
4,$;
701
757
394
412 7t8 18,515 396 2,703
TotalExpenditures$25,099$43,128$108,74656,799$17,172$127,101$11,030$7,20s$31,193$3,112$22,386 11
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPEIIDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
Revenues
Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:
Communications
Utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 234 Fund 236 Fund 237 250 Fund251 Fund252 Fund253 Fund Cobble Praire Oaks Willow Creek Blue Ravine Willow Am River Ridge Ranch Silverbrook East Oaks Steeplechase CreekSo. CanyonNo.
Willow
Springs
Fund262 Fund266
Willow Broadstone 3
Spres CFD#ll CFD #12
397
320
39,686
27,918
66,052
2,942
345
241
13,792
350
12,403
851
772
tu:
797158
262352 2,238 t5
3s0
1,286
3,392
238
1,t92
10,265
3,2t0
41,958
1,779
5,509
2,t21
5,3t6
63,171
16,928
138,383
3,509
21.374
TotalRevenue $ 397 $ 320 $ 345 $ 241 $ 352 $ 420 $ 3,035 $ 936 $ 15 $ 1,192 S 7,437 45;
608
7222,
320
636
4,558
37,690
1,677
36,466
1,861
4,126
7,747
350
1,161
2,830
1,355
10,34s
20,522
350
3,968
469 18,280 510 r,220 748 t,425 2,483
TotalExpenditures $ 4,2s6 $ 154,878 $ 6,024 $ 28,616 $ 10,006 $ 15,9ss S s1,820 $ 27,323 $ s,266 $ 62,721 $ 243,365 12
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
Revenues:
Special Assessment
Interest
Other Revenue
Expenditures:
Communications
Utilities
Contracts
Maintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 267 Fund 270 Fund 271 Fund 275 Fund278 Fund 281 Fund 282 Fund 283 Fund 284 Fund 285 Fund 288 Fund 289 Maint Dist Maint Dist
CFD#18 CFD#I9 TOTAL
ARC No.2
CF'D #13
8,687
6,385
2s,900
ARC
No.2
Residences
ATARC
ARC
North #3
Blue Ravine
Oaks No.2
Folsom
Hts #2
Willow Creek
Estates #2
Prospect
Ridse
Broadstone Islands
#4 CFD#16
t,624
2t3
268
217
233
s81
r,573
3,607 6ll
208
947 l.4l I
5,l6l
3,336
27,49t
293
478
3,798
9r,007
375
t97
,o:
I,081
1,656
3,000
82,817
5,3 13
64,308
1,957
6,01I
34 6,248
L2,470
2s,,48
472,055
I23,120
877321
29223
s2 3,067 t,484
TotalRevenue $ 1,837 $ 814 $ 485 $ 5,180 $ 6ll $ 1,155 $ 545 $ l,4ll $ 77t $ 52 $ 3,067 $ 1,484 $ 41,259 131
350
t,842
124
5,288
48,133
t,045
1,370
4,112
1,277
2s,279
254
1,804
1,704
7,158
335
2,100
106,403
7,975
6,s02 316 1,515 t4 378 137
TotalExpenditwes$ 47,474 $ 2,639 S 12,462 $ 6l,12l $ 6,997 $ 28,633 $12t,748 $ 40,332 $ 99,113 $ 7,151 $155,469 $ tZ,6'tL $1,639,016 13
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX E
City of Folsom, California
Combined Water Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31, 2021
OPERATINC REVENUES:
Chtrgs For Seryicg
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPERATING EX}ENSES:
Emplq€e Servic6
Utilities
Supplies
Msintenmce and Operstion
Contactual Seruic4
Deprsiation
Other Operating ExperoB
TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPENSE)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
CIIANGE IN NETASSETS
NETASSETS, JULY 1
rt 2021
As of
t213112020
FY 2022
As of
taau202l
FY 2021
ACTUAL
Fy 2022
BUDGET
FY2l Forec6t
As of
t2l3ll202l
VARIANCE
(10,000)
136,900
(100,000)
20q000
(35q000)
4,450J02
VARIANCE
s
9,88a11 I
9,882,1 ll
2,6t5,401
4t2,4t3
504,687
2t3,1|
?91,981
2,229,233
458,407
(lo,l23)
(9s5,E?r)
(652,061)
2,004,210
(444,303)
(M4,303'
1,559,908
t02,364,566
t03,924.,414
(4145,191)
_!_rr:t7r,r83_
2,429,552
4u,l4E
466,385
694,360
807,832
2,336,45t
5,301,163
879,169
983,110
520,035
2,089,956
4,450,102
268,879
5,068,660
15,069
455,908
17,865,000
17,865,000
5,489,559
713,100
I,197,390
1,245,060
3,034,037
n,sn,517
5,331,423
s,479,559
850,000
1,097,390
1,445,060
2,684,037
4,450,102
1000/0
lgvo
92Vo
tt6%
88o/o
1000/0
4\o/o
44%
58o/o
396/0
56Vo
27r/o
48vo
6004
48lo
(3,06q007)
(301,952)
(731,00s)
(550,700)
(2,226,205)
2,336,45t
TOTAL OPERATING EXPT]NSES 1,225,834
oPERAT|NC TNCOMI 2,656,n7
NONOPERATING RDVENUE (EXTENSES)I
Impnct Fes
Other
lnvstmenl Income
Intgrgovemmental
Procads ofFirocing
Debt Senic€ Experuo
Other Reimbwemonts
Capitsl Outlay - Projects
208,714
1,684
t03,529
1u,523
10,933
79,821
690,225
12,774,930
272,000
100,000
13504
190/o 329,055
290,225
25,000
272,000
100,000
(400.000) 42vo
(12,149,930) oVo
- t00%
_ 100%
(s65,702)
(t2,163,997)
(192,179)
(100,000)
tM% 1,8929E5
100% (209000) oo/o
4t%
t8%
0Yo
29yo
0%
Oo/t
4%
120/0
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:
TrmfeB In
Trrufers Out
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS
94,486
136,505 7,6t3,537
I l0,l 14,609 109,978,103
(836,898) (1,E92,985)
(16,315,1q3)
(4,43t,623')
200,000
(1,105,800)
(905,800)
109,978,103
20q000
(5,877,532)
104,100,571NET ASSETS
RESTRICTED NETASSETS
UNRf, STRICTED NET ASSETS _q_10?,0r4r:.1_
I Includs the following fi.nds: Water Impact Feg Water Operatin& Water Capital md Wator MeteB Prior yetr includB prior period adjEtment for GASB 68
'14
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX F
City of Folsom, California
Combined Wastewater Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
OPERATING REVENUESI
Charges For Senices
Prison Seruices
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPf,RATING EXPENSES:
Employee Senices
Utilities
Supplies
Maintenance and Opention
Conlmctual SeNices
Depreciation
Other Openting Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES):
Impaot Fees
Investment Income
other
Debt Service
C.pital Outlay - Projects
TOTAL NONOPf, RATING Rf, VENUE
(EXPENSE)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS
NET ASSETS, JULY I
FY 2021
As of
t2l3t/2020
FY 2022
As of
t2l3u202t
FY 202t
ACTUAI
Fv 2022
BUDGET
FY21 Foreest
As of
t2/3t/2021
VARIANCE VARIANCE
Foremst w Budget Actual w Budget
$ % s
4,194,958
33,600
4,228,558
1,389,954
41,3'71
131,809
67,301
37,662
1,104,599
t84,779
2,957,481
t,271,077
29,496
7? Sr'1
6,052
(101,466)
'1,624
1,278,70t
(32't,933)
(327,933)
950,768
65,009,255
65,960,022
(344,433)
_!__95,6t s,5Ee
4,961,l I 9 8,407,529 8,451,954
67,200
8,525,t54
67 2,926,471
95,81 8
275,144
194,t84
475,823
2,227,348
39,835
102,884
3,t72,450
3,030,598
90,000
530,464
376,1 50
782,760
4t 'no
5,22r,682
3,303,472
8,557,954
2,990,598
90,000
330,464
276,t50
682,760
2,227,348
4ll 7r0
66,920
135,000
(2,383,271)
66,586,418
100,000
(40,000)
(200,000)
(100,000)
000,000)
2,227,348
(120,000)
(13,990,929)
(3,496,835)
(t,666,711)
(s4,t57)
(396,104)
(26s,288)
(741,834)
1,163,2t6
32,226
(167,329\
(70,220)
(13,e84,785)
tol,%
100%
l0t%
t00%
l34o/t
49/o
zl,%
127%
59%
586/o
59o/o
45%
40%
25yo
29o/o
4%
36%
57Vn
%
88%
t,363,821
35,843
134,360
1 10,862
34,926
1,161,216
99%
tjff/o
62%
73%
8'7o/o
707
19,591
64,780
6,t44
186,920
135,000
t3,990,929
(16,891,r23)
(2,578,274)
725,t98
(725,t98)
Q25,t98)
68,969,695
68,969,695
Q4,05'7)
$ 6E,895,638
36%
100%
0%
10.5o/o
48%
0%
60/0
l0l 34o/o
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:
Tmnsfers In
Transfer Out
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS
30,133
'7a3,116 3,960,440
69,752,8t1 68,969,695
0%
NET ASSETS
RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS
Includes the following funds: Sewer Opemting and Sewer Capital Prior y€r inoludes prior peiiod adjuslment for GASB 68
15
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
APPENDIX G
City of Folsom, California
Combined Solid Waste Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended December 31,2021
OPERATING REVENUESI
Chargc For Serie
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPERATINC DCENSES:
Employee Servics
Utiliti6
Supplie
Msintenance and Operation
Confachul Seryices
Depreciation
Othor Openting Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REYENUE (EXPENSE):
Impact Fees
Invqtment Income
Int glgovemmmtal Rsvenus
Other
Debt ServicsExpeme
capitsl outlay
TOTAL NONOPERATING Rf, VENUE
(EXPENSE)
INCOME (LOSS) BDFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AIID TRANSFERS
CIIANCE IN NET ASSETS
NET ASSETS, JULY I
Fv 202t
As of
12t31t2020
FY 2022
As of
12Rv202t
FY 2022
BIJDGET
VARIANCE VARIANCE
ForcGt w Budget Actul vs Budget
$%$o/o
9l
9l
FY2l Foreest
As ofFY 2021
5,879,538
38,943
909,956
r,l 10,328
3,63t,672
802,574
456,683
t9,706
30,286
242,438
ta3
t7
7,315,838
7,315,838
2,852,164
18,296
390,500
437,758
L,410,204
383,107
225,375
t69,361
30,546
498
t20,955
930,84',1
4,400
(709,41 1)
(70s,01 r)
225,836
(5,649,39t)
(5,423,5s5)
(213,019)
-!__(5,636,5zI
2,864,t2't
18,813
402,373
417,793
1,850,407
386,656
219,369
26,188
40,627
161,562
t6,u1,4t0
16,Ut,410
6,94t,U4
20,500
1,219,t02
538,133
4,285,387
630,287
51 1,340
82,000
158,097
2,328,292
t,'t42,317
(1,142,371)
(t,742,377)
(3,912,020)
Q,972,020)
6,54t,644
23,400
t,224,102
788,133
4,685,38',1
802,514
(400,000)
2,900
5,000
250,000
400,000
802,574
(20,000)
(t,673,366)
(4,017,st7)
0,687)
(8t6,729)
020,340)
Q,434,980)
386,656
502,911
(29t,97t)
(55,812)
(tL'7,470)
(2,r66,730)
9l
n4%
l00o/o
l460/o
lO9/o
630/o
63%
4t%
92o/o
33o/o
78o/o
43o/o
44%
460/o
430/0
32%
26o/o
10/.
2Wo
4lo/o
t00%
tog%
49t,340
82,000
158,097
654,926
(1,453,840)
(5,425,860)
96.ro/o
l00o/o
t00%
2*/o
l04Yo
313%
CAPITAL CONTRIBIITIONS ANI' TRANSFERS:
Tnnsfors In
Tnnsfers Out
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIAUTIONS
ANI' TRANSFERS
427,089
2,790,933 1,677,370
(1,181,090) (3,9',12,023)
-9lo/o
NETASSETS
RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
UNRESTRICTED ITET ASSETS
* Inoludq the following funds: Solid Waste Operating, Solid Wste Capiirl, snd Solid Waste Plan Ar€ Capitsl Prior yar includes prior pedod adjusbnent for GASB 68
8l $ (3,972,020)
16
02/08/2022 Item No.1.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.2.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
02/08/2022 Item No.3.
Folsom City Council
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: 2t8t2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1323 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and
Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California, LLC Relative to the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project (Second Reading and Adoption)
FROM: Community Development Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to hold the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1323 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California, LLC Relative to the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project (Second Reading and Adoption)
BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Project. No members of the public provided comments. The Commission voted 6-0-0 to recommend to the City Council approval of the Project as proposed, with findings and conditions.
On January 25,2022, the City Council held a public hearing where Ordinance No. 1323 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California, LLC Relative to the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project (Second Reading and Adoption)
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
was introduced and the first hearing was held. The City Council expressed support for the Project and voted 5-0-0 to approve the amendments.
POLICY/RULE
As set forth in the State Planning and Zoning Law, approval of, or amendments to, a Development Agreement is a legislative act which requires approval by the City Council following review and recommendation by the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS
On May 15,2015, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Large-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Planned Development Permit, Design Guidelines, lnclusionary Housing Plan, and Amended and Restated Development Agreement Amendment for development of an 879-unit single-family residential subdivision known as the Russell Ranch Subdivision within the eastern portion of the Folsom Plan Area. ln March 2018, the City Council approved a Large Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, a Small LotVesting Tentative Subdivision Map and DevelopmentAgreementAmendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement.
The Development Agreement Amendment is proposed to the Russell Ranch Phase 2, Lots 24-32 Development Agreement including Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes LLC.
The recommended changes are minor in nature and include referencing recent entitlements and do not change the unit count within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.
City staff conducted a thorough review of the proposed modifications to the development agreement and is supportive of the Development Agreement Amendment.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact is anticipated with approval of the Development Agreement amendment associated Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project, as the project will not result in any changes in the total number of residential units or the total amount of commercial square footage within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan. The Development Agreement amendment simply reflects recent entitlements.
ENVIORNMENTAL REVIEW
Ascent Environmental Consultants prepared an analysis of the Project dated November 16,2021. The City certified the FPASP EIR/EIS on June 28,2011. Several addendums and subsequent environmental documents have been approved since 2011. The FPASP was updated in 2018 to include all the various approved plan amendments and mapping
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
1 modifications made since the first approval in2011. As amended, the FPASP provides for additional residential development, up to a total of 11,461 housing units.
Although the Project would result in a population increase from what was approved in 2018, the population for the Russell Ranch development overall would remain less than what was originally approved when the FPASP was adopted. Based on the analysis, the impacts of the Project are determined to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, the Russell Ranch ElR, and the Russell Ranch Lots 24-32 Environmental Checklist and Addendum. No new impacts as a result of the Project have been identified.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance No. 1323 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California, LLC Relative to the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Lots 24-32 Project (Second Reading and Adoption) Submitted,
PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
ORDINANCE NO. 1323
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.3 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF'F'OLSOM AND LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFOR|IIA, LLC RELATM TO THE RUSSELL RANCH PHASE 2 LOTS 24-32
PROJECT
WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan was prepared and certilied by the City Council on June 11, 2011, and the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission approved the City's annexation of the Folsom Plan Area on January 18,2012; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority in Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the Government Code, the City Council, following a duly notified public hearing on May 12,2015, approved the Tier 1 Development Agreement relative to the Folsom Area Specific Plan (Tier 1 DA) for the Russell Ranch Phases l-3.; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Russell Ranch Phase 2Lots24-32 Project consists of the development of 208 unit traditional residential community located within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City, the developer of the Russell Ranch Lots24-32 Project desire to amend the DA in order to provide a minor update to reflect recent entitlements to provide greater certainty and clarity to matters that are common, necessary and essential for the development ofthe project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on December 15, 2021, considered Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California,LLC relative to the Russell Ranch Lots24-32 Project at a duly noticed public hearing as presuibed by law, and recommended that the City Council approve said Amendment No. 3; and WHEREAS' all notices have been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and the Folsom Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby does ordain as follows:
Ordinance No. 1323
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
SECTION 1 FINDINGS
A. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
B. The Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement by and between the City of Folsom and Lennar Homes, LLC is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City's General Plan and the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan.
C. The Amendment No.3 to the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices.
D. The Amendment No. 3 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the immediate area, nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or to the general welfare of the residents of the City as a whole.
E. The Amendment No. 3 will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.
F. The Amendment No. 3 has been prepared in accordance with, and is consistent with, Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5, and City Council Resolution No. 2370.
G. All notices have been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and the Folsom Municipal Code.
H. The Amendment No. 3 is consistent with the Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Impact Statement for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan certified by the City Council on June 1I,2011. Based on the analysis, the impacts of the Project are determined to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, the Russell Ranch EIR, and the Russell Ranch Lots24-32 Environmental Checklist and Addendum. No new impacts as a result of the Project have been identified, which are incorporated herein by reference. None of the events in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines exists which warrant the preparation of a subsequent EIR or supplemental EIR.
SECTION 2 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Tier lDevelopment Agreement by andbetweenthe City of Folsom and Lennar Homes of California,LLC on behalf of the City after the effective date of this Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 1323
Page2 of3 Page 43
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
SECTION 3 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council declares that it would have passed each section inespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.
SECTION 4 EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in full or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.
This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on January 25,2022 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 8,2022.
On a motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this 8th day of February 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1323
02/08/2022 Item No.4.
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10792 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288521 for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST) was signed into law on December 4,2015. Under FAST, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core federal-aid program to States for the purpose of achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Local Assistance (DLA) manages Califomia's local agency share ofHSIP funds. Califomia's Local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with nationally recognized crash reduction factors (CRFs). Local HSIP projects must be identified based on crash experience, crash potential, crash rate, or other data-supported means. , Using the data-based conclusions and recommendations of the draft2}Zl Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), the Public Works Department applied for and received funding for the HSIP funded project identified in the table below:
MEETING DATE: 21812022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10792 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to
Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288521 for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project
FROM: Public Works Department
02/08/2022 Item No.5.
Location of Work Description of Work HSIP
Funds
(State)
Local
Match
Funds
Folsom BoulevardA.latoma Station Drive
Blue Ravine Road/Flower Drive
Natoma Station Drivc
E. Bidwell Street/Blue Ravine Road
Oak Ave Parkway
Broadstone Parkway
Glenn Drive
Creekside Drive
Folsom Auburn Road/Oak Avenue Parkway Folsom Lake
Crossing
E. Natoma Street/Prison Road
Green Valley Road
lron Point Road/Willard Drive
a
a
a
a
a
a
Improve signal
hardware and signal
timing and install
raised pavement
markers and striping.
$ 792,300 8792,300
Caltrans requires a Program Supplement Agreement to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for projects administered through Caltrans. Prior to invoicing Caltrans for reimbursable costs, the city must retum the fully executed Program Supplement Agreements.
Staffrecently advertised Requests for Proposals to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the Signal Hardware. The contract for those professional services will be presented to City Council in a separate staff report during tonight's City Council meeting for review and approval.
POLICY / RULE
Caltrans requires that the executed Program Supplement Agreement is accompanied with a certified Resolution that clearly identifies the representative who is authorized to sign on the Agency's behalf.
ANALYSIS
The City of Folsom is required to execute the Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans Local Assistance prior to invoicing Caltrans for any reimbursable costs.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City was awarded HSIP funds in the amount of $1,584,600 for this project. The City's match is reimbursed at a percentage of 50% or $792,300. The matching funds will utilize Local Transportation Improvement funds from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446). 2
02/08/2022 Item No.5.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
As part of the Preliminary Engineering phase of this project, an analysis will be performed to determine compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ATTACIIMENT
Resolution No. 10792 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288521 for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffrc Safety Project Submitted,
&,r-
WORKS DIRECTOR
3
02/08/2022 Item No.5.
RESOLUTION NO. 10792
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT 03.5288521 F'OR THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CYCLE 10 TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department applied for and received Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funds for the Signal Hardware and Timing Project; and WHEREAS, the executed Supplement Agreement must be returned to Caltrans prior to invoicing for any reimbursable expenses; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans requires that the signed Program Supplement Agreement is accompanied with a certified Resolution that clearly identifies the representative who is authorized to sign on the Agency's behalf; and
WHEREAS, the matching funds for Highway Safety Improvement Program will utilize Local Transportation Improvement funds from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, funds received will be credited to the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288521 for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8ft day of February 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10792
Page I of 1 Page 48
02/08/2022 Item No.5.
Folsom City Council
Staff
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10793 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle l0 Traffic Safety Project and Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST) was signed into law on December 4,2015. Under FAST, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core federal-aid program to States for the purpose ofachieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. California's Local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with nationally recognized crash reduction factors (CRFs). Local HSIP projects must be identified based on crash experience, crash potential, crash rate, or other data-supported means.
Using the data-based conclusions and recommendations of the draftZ}Zl Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), the Public Works Department applied for and received funding for three separate HSIP funded projects.
In October 202l,City Council approved ResolutionNo. 10730 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Program Supplement Agreements to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03'5288521. One of the three projects that received HSIP funding, identified in I
MEETING DATE: 21812022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. 10793 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle l0 Traffic Safety Project and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Public Works Department
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
Resolution No. 10730 as the HSIP Cycle 10 Traffrc Safety Project, is the subject of this engineering design. Due to the project's reimbursement rate of 50%, a resolution specific to this project needs to be signed, and the agreement will be presented to City Council in a separate staff report during tonight's City Council meeting for review and approval, Project specifics are shown in the table below:
The scope of the Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Hom will consist of field investigations, preparing base maps and utility research, new traffic counts at project intersections to support evaluation of operational improvements such as flashing yellow arrow implementation and to collect 85th percentile speeds data for advanced dilemma zone detection consideration and evaluation. Additionally, project plans, specifications, and estimates, bidding and construction support services will be provided by this project.
Staff publicly advertised a Request for Proposals to provide Professional Engineering Services on September 20, 2021 and received three proposals on December 7,2Q21, Proposals were received from TJKM, Dokken Engineering, and Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. (Kimley Horn).
POLICY / RULE
Section 2,36.080 of the Folsorn Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
The proposal reviewpanel consisted of three Public Works staff members. Eachpanel member individually reviewed and scored the proposals as described in the Proposal Evaluation/Consultant Selection section of the RFP. Each panel member was given a scoring matrix, with the results of those reviews shown below
2 Location of Work Description of Work HSIP
Funds
(State)
Local
Match
Funds
Folsom Boulevard & Natoma Station Drive
Blue Ravine Drive & Flower Drive
Blue Ravine Drive & Natoma Station Drive
Blue Ravine Drive & East Bidwell Street
East Bidwell Street & Oak Avenue Parkway
East Bidwell Sheet & Broadstone Parkway
East Bidwell Street & Glenn Drive
East Bidwell Street & Creekside Drive
Folsom Auburn Road & Oak Ave Parkway
Folsom Auburn Road & Folsom Lake Crossing
Improve signal hardware,
signal timing, and installation
of raised pavement markers
and striping.
$ 792,300 s792,300
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
Reviewer A Reviewer B Reviewer C
TJKM Dokken Kimley
Hom TJKM Dokken Kimley
Horn TJKM Dokken Kimley
Horn
Understanding
of Work
(30 Points)
25 18 27 28 28 29 15 25 28
Experience
with Similar
Work
(20 Points)
13 l0 l5 t9 18 19 18 15 18
Project Team
(20 Points) l5 8 15 18 t7 18 20 20 20
Familiarity
with State
Procedures
(10 Points)
10 l0 l0 7 10 8 l0 10 10
Financial
Responsibility
(10 Points)
) 7 10 9 9 9 t0 l0 t0
Proposal
Quality
(10 Points)
5 5 10 9 8 9 5 6 t0
Scorins Total 70 s8 87 90 90 92 78 86 96
Kimley IIom was unanimously scored as the top ranked candidate, scoring high marks in their understanding of the work to be completed, similar experience with similar projects and proposal quality, City Staff is very comfortable recommending Kimley Hom for the award of this contract based on their submitted proposal for this project and their prior experience with the City of Folsom producing high quality and cost-effective projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City was awarded State HSIP funds in the amount of $1,584,600 for this project. The City's match is reimbursed at a percentage of 50% or $792,300. The design portion of this project has been allocated for $264,200 with up to $132,100 in HSIP funds and $132,100 in City matching funds. The design contract with Kimley Hom would be authorized for a not to exceed amount of $95,364.75. Staff is requesting an appropriation in the amount of $95,365 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) for this project, which 5070 or $47,682.37 will be reimbursed to that fund through Caltrans invoicing.
It should be noted that the cost estimate from Kimley Hom to provide these services was 507o to 60Yo less than the cost of the other two proposals. Staff determined that Kimley Horn was J
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
able to utilize their past experience with the City of Folsom's traflic signal network to accomplish cost savings in the preliminary and design phase of this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL RDVIEW
The scope of Kimley . Horn's professional services includes providing environmental evaluations and a technical memorandum that will be submitted to Caltrans for approval of the project as it perlains to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10793 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Conhact with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project and Appropriation of Funds l"u
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
4
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
RESOLUTION NO. 10793
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A DESIGN
AND CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES,INC. FOR THE HIGHWAY SAF'ETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CYCLE 10 TRAF'FIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND APPROPRIATION
OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, using recommendations of the 2021 Local Road Safety Plan, the Public Works Department applied for and received Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 funds in the amount of $1,584,600 for the design and construction of roadway safety countermeasures and signal timing changes at various signalized intersections throughout Folsom; and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services was publicly advertised on September 20,2021 and on December 7,2021proposals were received from TJKM, Dokken Engineering, and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the proposals were individually reviewed by a proposal review panel consisting of three Public Works Employees, with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. being chosen as the most qualified firm by all reviewers; and
WHEREAS, there are matching funds of 50% required to utilize these HSIP funds; and WHEREAS, there is sufficient funding available for the matching funds in the Local Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Improvements Project for the not-to-exceed amount of $95,364.75.
NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $95,365 from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) as contract cost along with additional revenue of $47,682.37 with the remainder to be from fund balance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8ft day of February 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Resolution No. 10793
Page I of2
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10793
Page2 of2 Page 54
02/08/2022 Item No.6.
Folsom City Council
Staff
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10794 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Condition Investigation and Rehabilitation Analysis.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Public Works Deparhnent manages the City of Folsom's Pavement Management Program, which includes funding for the inspection, condition analysis, repair, resurfacing and maintenance of roadways in the City.
This project will analyze the pavement on Blue Ravine Road between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a numerical index between 0 and 100 which is used to indicate the general condition of a pavement section, with 0 representing the worst possible oondition and 100 representing the best possible condition. On this section of roadway, the PCI ranges between 34 and 85, with most of the pavement in the 40 to 60 range, which equates to fair and poor conditions.
The pavement analysis will consist of a visual inspection, various locations of pavement cores to determine asphalt/subbase thickness, materials testing for asphalt composition and the use of a Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) to determine actual pavement strength. Utilizing this data, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley Horn) will provide a iehabilitation I
MEETING DATE: 21812022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10794 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley-Hom and Associates, [nc. for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Condition Investigation and Rehabilitation Analysis FROM: Public Works Department
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
recommendation report and will work with City staff to develop project Plans, Specifications and Estimate for a Summer 2022 Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The award for a construction contract will be presented to City Council at that time.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080 of the F'olsom Munisipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
ANALYSIS
A Request for Proposals to provide Professional Engineering Services was publicly advertised on December 2,2021. On January 12,2022, five proposals were received from the following firms: Kimley Horn, REY Engineers, Geocon, NCE and crawford & Associates.
The proposals were reviewed and analyzed based on the following criteria: understanding of work, experience with similar work, project team and proposal quality.
Although all firms are qualified to perform this type of work, Kimley Horn was ultimately chosen due to their outstanding project team, which consists of Geocon, Quality Engineering Solutions and Unico Engineering. Geocon will perform pavement coring and materials testing; Quality Engineering Solutions will perform the FWD Non-Destructive Testing and Unico Engineering will perform any needed project surveying.
In addition, Kimley Horn has experience with Cold In-Place Recycling as a pavement rehabilitation method, which this project may likely be a candidate for.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City Council's approval of Resolution No. 10794 would authorize the execution of a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley Horn for a total, not-to-exceed contract amount of $126,322.
Funds for this contract are budgeted and available in the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project No. 80i7, utilizing Measure A and Road Maintenance and Repair funds,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has been deemed categorically exempt from environmental review due to the following exemption: Class 1: Existing Facilities (c) Existing Street Resurfacing. 2
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10794 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Confract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. forthe Blue Ravine Road Pavement Condition Investigation and Rehabilitation Analysis
DIRECTOR
$b
3
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
RESOLUTION NO. 10794
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A DESIGN AND CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY.HORN AND
ASSOCIATES,INC. FOR THE BLUE RAVINE ROAD PAVEMENT CONDITION
INVESTIGATION AND REHABILITATION ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has identified Blue Ravine Road between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway as needing pavement rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, Blue Ravine Road is a major regional arterial and due to the severe pavement distresses a detailed pavement analysis should be performed to assist in determining the correct pavement rehabilitation method(s); and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services was publicly advertised on December 2,2021and on January 12,2022 proposals were received from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., REY Engineers, Geocon, NCE and Crawford & Associates.; and
WHEREAS, the proposals were reviewed and analyzed based on the criteria outlined in the Request for Proposals with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. being chosen as the most qualified firm; and
WHEREAS, funds for the contract are budgeted and available in the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project No. S}IT,utilizing Measure A and Road Maintenance and Repair funds; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be for the not to exceed amount of $126,322; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Condition Investigation and Rehabilitation Analysis in the amount of $126,322
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8ft day of February 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Resolution No. 10794
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10794
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
This page is intentionally left blank.
02/08/2022 Item No.7.
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10795 - A Resolution Revising the Boundary of the Pilot Residential Permit Parking Program in the Historic District.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
At the September 28,2021 meeting, the City Council approved Resolution No. 10707, which authorized staff to implement a temporary residential permit parking program in the Historic District. The boundaries of the permit program were limited to Figueroa Street between Scott Street and Reading Street, Scott Street between Sutter Street and Figueroa Street, and the half- blocks along Wool Street and Decatur Street between Figueroa Street and the Sutter/Figueroa alley. The temporary residential permit parking program took effect on December 17, 2021 and will be in effect for six months, ending inMay 2022.
At the January 25,2022 meeting, resident Joe Gagliardi addressed the City Council under the Business From the Floor portion of the agenda to request that the boundary of the permit parking zone be extended all the way to Sutter Street to make residents that live on Sutter Street eligible to receive permits
POLICY / RULE
Section 22507(a) of the California Vehicle Code authorizes local goveming bodies to prohibit or restrict the parking ofvehicles on certain streets, or portions ofthereof, during all or certain 1 MEETING DATE: 2/8/2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10795 - A Resolution Revising the Boundary of the Pilot Residential Permit Parking Program in the Historic District
FROM: Public Works Department
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
hours of the day, and to designate certain streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents adjacent to the streets for their us and the use of their guests, under which the residents may be issued a permit that exempt them from the parking restrictions.
ANALYSIS
fhe cunent boundary of the permit parking program includes the following road segments:
o Figueroa Strcct bctwceu ScoLt. Street and Rcading Street r Scott Street between Sutter Street and Figueroa Street r Wool Street between the Sutter/Figueroa alley and Figueroa Street r Decatur Street between the Sutter/Figueroa alley and Figueroa Street With the proposed adjustment, the resulting permit parking program boundary would be:
r Figueroa Street between Scott Street and Reading Street o Scott Street between Sutter Street and Figueroa Street o Wool Street between Sutter Street and Figueroa Street (extended) o Decatur street between sutter Street and Figueroa street (extended) The proposed boundary adjustment is depicted in the attached Figure l.
FINAI\CIAL IMPACT
There is no significant financial impact associated with this item.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
None required,
ATTACHMENTS
1. Figure l: Historic District Residential Parking Permit Boundary
2. Resolution No. 10795 - A Resolution Revising the Boundary of the Pilot Residential Permit Parking Program in the Historic District
Submitted.
-^h/0 &^
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
2
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
Attachment 1
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
Figure 1. Historic District Residential Permit Parking Boundary m FON-SOI\4
Legend
Yellow: Current Permit
Boundary
Red: Proposed Addition
to Permit Boundary
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
Attachment 2
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
RESOLUTION NO. T0795
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE BOUNDARY OF THE PILOT RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARIflNG PROGRAM IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on September 28,202I the City Council approved Resolution No 10707, which established a temporary residential permit parking program; and WHEREAS, the approved boundary of the temporary permit program was limited to Figueroa Street between Scott Street and Reading Street, Scott Street between Sutter Street and Figueroa Street, Wool Street between Figueroa Street and the Sutter/Figueroa alley and Decatur Street between Figueroa Street and the Sutter/Figueroa alley; and WHEREAS, at the January 25, 2022 Council meeting a resident requested that the boundary be extended to Sutter Street in order to make Sutter Street residents eligible to receive parking permits; and
WHEREAS, the boundary would be extended along Wool Street and Decatur Street from the Sutter/Figueroa alley to Sutter Street:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves the revised boundary of the pilot residential permit parking program in the Historic District as set forth in this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8ft day of February 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10795
02/08/2022 Item No.8.
iF#Jtr"Ei.Lt]bl.
O ltraGll.a lr IAY!Ltl
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Parks and Recreation Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10796 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. for Construction of the 405 Natoma Station Drive Exterior ADA Upgrades and Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the maintenance of existing infrastructure (building and parking lot) located at 405 Natoma Station Drive. The Exterior ADA Upgrades project focuses on correcting non-compliant exterior building access issues that were identified in a2021CASp (Certified Access Specialist) report to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the City of Folsom's ADA Transition Plan.
This project can be broken down into five main categories of work:
Maintaining Building Access - The contractor shall ensure that all entrances allow safe travel under the work zone and measures will be taken to protect pedestrian and vehicle traffic from falling debris, tools, materials, and any other hazards. The contractor shall plan to address these issues 5 days prior to commencing any work.
1 MEETING DATE: 2t8t2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10796 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering Inc. for Construction of the 405 Natoma Station Drive Exterior ADA Upgrades and Appropriation of Funds
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department
02/08/2022 Item No.9.
Site Striping and Signage - Under this item of work, the contractor shall perform all items of parking lot and accessibility paths striping and signage as shown in the project documents and CASp report.
Demolition - This portion of the project involves safe removal of concrete walkways, stairs, ramps, asphalt, signage, landscaping, and drinking fountain in the project drawings and CASp report
PCC Walkways/CurbslRetaining walls/Handrails - Under this item, the walkways, curbs, retaining walls, and handrails will be replaced according to the specifications listed in the project documents and the City of Folsom Standard Construction Specifications.
Repave Asphalt - This portion of the project involves replacing out of compliance areas of asphalt noted in the CASp report to the specifications called out in the project documents.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.
ANALYSIS
Parks and Recreation staff prepared the bid package, and the Project was publicly advertised on January 6,2022. Bids were opened on January 20,2022, with the following bids received:
1. Doue Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc $ 131,970
2. Seesert Construction $ 160,965
3. Biondi Paving and Engineering, Inc. $ 167,850
4. Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. $ 173,269
5. B&R Contracting. $ 175,000
6. B&M Builders. s 193.423
7. Sierra Asphalt, Inc. $ 214.s00
The staff estimate for this project was $140,000. Staff has reviewed the bid presented by Doug Veerkamp General Engineering and find it to be responsive to the City's request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City Council's approval of Resolution No. 00000 would authorize the execution of a Construction Contract with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $131,970 with a total project budget of $145,167, which includes a ten percent contingency of $13,197 for potential change orders.
2
02/08/2022 Item No.9.
The funding for the Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. contract was included in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 General Fund (Fund 010) Budget in the amount of $150,000, which is currently available for this contract.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has been deemed categorically exempt from environmental review.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10796 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Contract with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. for Construction of the 405 Natoma Station Drive Exterior ADA Upgrades and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks and Recreation Director
J
02/08/2022 Item No.9.
RESOLUTION NO. 10796
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH DOUG VEERKAMP GENERAL ENGINEERING,INC. F''OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 405 NATOMA STATION DRIVE EXTERIOR ADA
UPGRADES AND APPROPRIATION OF F'UNDS
WHEREAS' the City of Folsom desires to replace existing concrete, asphalt, retaining walls, and drinking fountains identified as non-compliant in a 2021 CASp (Certified Access Specialist) report at a city-owned property located at 405 Natoma Station Drive; and WHEREAS, the City of nolsom desires to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the City of Folsom's ADA Transition Plan; and WHEREAS, this project was publicly advertised on January 6,2022, and the bids were received on January 20, 2022 with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, funds were budgeted in Fiscal Year202l-22for this project and are currently available ; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREF'ORE' BE IT RESOLVED thatthe City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the Cify Manager to execute a construction agreement with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. for the ADA Upgrades at 405 Natoma Station Drive in the amount of $ I 3 I ,97 0, with the budgeted amount to include a ten percent contingency of $13,9197, for a total project budget of$145,167.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of February 2022,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10796
Page I of I Page 70
02/08/2022 Item No.9.
[,r{-lLs$sI
(i tt r r crr, , &1 l'itr:{ a
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council pass and adopt the following Resolution:
Resolution No 10797 - A Resolution of the City Council Making Findings to Continue Teleconferencing Options for Public Meetings Under AB 361.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Pursuant to AB 361, the City Council passed Resolution No. 10737 on October 26,2021 to allow public meetings to continue offer teleconferencing as an option. In order to continue offering teleconferencing as an option for public meetings, City Council action is required every 30 days.
The rapid spread of the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) throughout California and the United States caused Governor Newsom to declare a state of emergency on March 4,2020.
The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors ratified the declaration of a state of emergency by the County Health Officer on March 10,2020, and the Folsom City Council made a similar declaration of a local emergency on March 16,2020.
In an effort to promote social distancing and reduce the rapid spread of COVID-l9, Califomia Legislature passed Assembly Bill 361 to allow teleconferencing as an option for public meetings. AB 361 was signed into law by Governor Newsom and becomes operative on October 1,2021.
I
MEETING DATE: 2/812022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10797 - A Resolution of the City Council Making Findings to Continue Teleconferencing Options for Public Meetings Under AB 361
F'ROM: City Attomey's Office
02/08/2022 Item No.10.
POLICY / RULE
In order for the City to offer teleconferencing as an option in public meetings, AB 361 requires findings be made every 30 days that the nature of the emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safely in person, or that the State or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing.
ANALYSIS
Calitbrnia Legislature passed Assembly tsill 361 as an urgency measure to allow public meetings to offer teleconferencing as an option, provided that the local legislative body makes findings every 30 days that the nature of the emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safely in person, or that the State or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing.
Notwithstanding national and local vaccination efforts, new variants of COVID-19 have continued the wide spread of COVID-19 throughout communities. The COVID-19 public health emergency continues to pose a threat to the public's health and safety, and the circumstances of the State of Emergency proclaimed by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020have not yet been abated.
Due to the fact that the COVID-I9 public health emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safety in person, and that state and local officials continue to recommend social distancing, the City Council has the ability to make necessary findings under AB 361 to allow the City to continue offer teleconferencing as an option for City public meetings.
F'INANCIAL IMPACT
Negligible.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(bX3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review.
ATTACHMENT
l. Resolution No. 10797 - A Resolution of the City Council Making Findings to Continue Teleconferencing Options for Public Meetings Under AB 361 Respectfully submitted,
2 Steven W*g, City Attorney
02/08/2022 Item No.10.
RESOLUTION NO. 10797
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING FINDINGS TO CONTINUE TELECONFERENCING OPTIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS UNDER AB 361 WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed on March 4,2020 a State of Emergency to exist in California as a result of the threat from the rapid spread of a respiratory illness caused by novel coronavirus2019 (COVID-19); and WHEREAS, on March10,2020 the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors ratified the County Public Health Officer's Proclamation of Local Public Health Emergency in Sacramento County due to the threat to public health and safety from COVID-I9; and WHEREAS, on March 16,2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10408 and proclaimed the existence of a local emergency in the City of Folsom; and WHEREAS, Sacramento County has documented community transmission of COVID- 19, with multiple cases of diagnosed patients and fatalities, and the County Health Officer has recommended measures to promote social distancing to prevent rapid transmission of COVID-l9; and
WHEREAS, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 361 on September 16, 2021 to allow meetings of legislative bodies to be conducted via teleconference, starting October I,202I, provided that findings are made every 30 days to continue teleconference meetings under AB 361.
NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby finds that it has reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency, that the COVID- 19 public health emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safely in person, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that public meetings of the City of Folsom may continue to offer teleconferencing as an option under AB 361.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8ft day of February,2}22,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
Resolution No. 10797
Page I of2
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
02/08/2022 Item No.10.
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10797
Page2 of2 Page 74
02/08/2022 Item No.10.
r'f,in,F3t!trt
(! all latl.a 11 lJ.tal st
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 2t812022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10798 - A Resolution Authorizing AnAdditional Appropriation in the Police Department Operating Budget for the Purchase of Police Equipment
FROM: Police Department
RECOMMENDATION / COIINCII, ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 10798 -A Resolution Authorizing an Additional Appropriation in the Police Department Operating Budget for the Purchase of Police Equipment.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In fiscal year 1996197 the State of California first enacted the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program under Assembly BilI3229. Under this program, cities and counties receive state funds to augment frontline police services. Grant awards are based on per capita population, with $100,000 being the minimum guaranteed award. Government Code Section 30061 requires that these funds shall be appropriated pursuant to a request from the Police Chief or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for the respective city. The request for use of this funding shall speciff the front-line law enforcement needs of the requesting entity including the personnel, equipment, and programs that arc necessary to meet those needs.
The Department currently has approximately $140,600 of COPS funds still available for use and the department has identified several items to be purchased that would make use of these additional funds. Staff is requesting to purchase a replacement audio/video recording system for the investigations interview room, a computerized voice stress analysis system and training, replacement ballistic helmets, drone equipment, a replacement intercom system for the counter area, a plotter, and a replacement awning for the Mobile Command and Control Vehicle. These 1
02/08/2022 Item No.11.
purchases will greatly enhance the effective and safe implementation of the Department's mlsslon.
POLICY / RULE
The Citizen's Option for Public Safety program is an on-going state program, but it requires a separate budget appropriation for continued funding. The funds must be used to supplement and not supplant existing local funding for law enforcement services.
ANALYSIS
The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds cannot be used for administrative overhead allocations in excess of 0.5 percent, nor can the allocation be used to fund the costs of any capital project or construction project that does not directly support front-line law enforcement services.
The City of Folsom and the Folsom Police Department are committed to utilizing technology to identifr and deter criminals. The Folsom Police Department is also committed to updating equipment in the department in order to provide better services to the public as well as to be as efficient with staff time as possible.
The Chief of Police requests approval to utilize AB3229 Citizen's Option for Public Safety state funds in the amount of $127,939 for the purchase of equipment to improve police operations.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to the General Fund. The projected cost of this proposal is $127,939.33. An additional appropriation will be required for the use of the COPS funding.
Staff is requesting an additional appropriation to be applied to the Police Department's FY 2021-22 Operating Budget in the amount of $I27 ,939 for the purchase of equipment.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10798 - A Resolution Authorizing an Additional Appropriation in the Police Department Operating Budget for the Purchase of Police Equipment Submitted,
2 Richard Hillman, Chief of Police
02/08/2022 Item No.11.
RESOLUTION NO. 10798
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION IN THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATING BUDGET F'OR THE PURCHASE OF POLICE
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS' the State of California enacted the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) program, under Assembly Bill3229, to fund front-line law enforcement services; and WHEREAS, these state funds are separate and apart from the proposed allocations from the City's General Fund and an additional appropriation is needed; and WHEREAS, the department is in need of equipment and items to be purchased will include audio/video recording equipment, computerized voice stress analysis and training, ballistic helmets, drone equipment, a plotter, intercom system and a replacement awning; and WHEREAS' sufficient previously received COPS funds are available for use in the amount of $127,939.
NOW' THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the Finance Director to appropriate an additional $127,939 of COPS funding receipts to the Police Department Operating Budget in the General Fund (Fund 010) to be used for the purchase of equipment
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of February, 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10798
Page I of I Page 77
02/08/2022 Item No.11.
This page is intentionally left blank.
02/08/2022 Item No.11.
"[-r{*ltr 8f}-sl,
(ri llllall.a at r^t0tl
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the fourth of five public hearings to: (1) receive community input on the eight "focus" maps selected by the City Council on January 11,2022, (2) select one oopreferred" map for further consideration, (3) discuss election sequencing, and (4) provide direction for the next public hearing scheduled for February 22, 2022.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On July 27,2021, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to transition from at- large to by-district elections. This is the fourth of five required public hearings to start the transition process.
POLICY / RULE
California Government Code Section 34886 authorizes the legislative body of a city to adopt an ordinance that requires the members of the legislative body to be elected "by district".
The change must be made in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act.
MEETING DATE: 21812022
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Public Hearing No. 4 Under the California Voting Rights Act Regarding the Composition of the City's Voting Districts Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010
F'ROM: City Attomey's Office
1
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
ANALYSIS
1. SUMMARY OF PAST PUBLIC HEARINGS
The process to transition to by-district election requires five public hearings where the community is invited to provide input regarding the composition of future City Council districts. Pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010, the first two public hearings to inform the public about the districting process (held on September 14 and October 12, 2021) are required before any map of district boundaries for the proposed voting districts can be drawn. The Council reviewed proposed maps at the third public hearing on January 11, 2022 and identified 8 focus maps.
At this fourth public hearing, the City Council is requested to further review the focus maps, receive public input and comment, identiff a oopreferred" map, as well as to discuss election sequencing. The City Council will adopt a final district map at the fifth public hearing. 2, ELECTION SEOUENCING
As the City transitions from at-large to by-district elections, the City Council must set a "sequence of elections" as required by the Elections Code so that the terms of the Councilmembers remain staggered pursuant to the City Charter, with 3 Councilmembers elected for a four-year term in2022 and every 4 years thereafter, and2 Councilmembers elected for a four-year term in2024 and every 4 years thereafter.
Accordingly, when the City Council adopts afinal district map, the Council will also have to identiff which 3 Council Districts will be up for election in2022 and which 2 Council Districts will be up for election in2024. In determining the sequence of the district elections, the City Council is required to give special consideration to the pulpose of the Califomia Voting Rights Act (i.e., not to impair the ability of voters who are members of a race, color or language minority group to elect candidates of their choice or their ability to influence the outcome of an election) and shall take into account the preferences expressed by members of the districts.
In a Council District sequenced for election in2022 or 2024 that has no currently serving Councilmember, any eligible registered voter in that Council District may mn for election in that District.
A Councilmember whose term ends in2022 residing in a Council District sequenced for the 2022 election can run for election in2022 to represent that Council District. Similarly, a Councilmember whose term ends in 2024 residing in a Council District sequenced for the 2024 election can run for election in2024 to represent that Council District.
A Councilmember whose term ends in2022 residing in a Council District sequenced for the 2024 election will leave office at the end of his or her term in 2022, and can run for election when that District is up for election in2024.
2 Page 80
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
A Councilmember whose term ends in2024 residing in a Council District sequenced for the 2022 election has the option to either serye out his or her term representing the City at-large until2024, or run for election in2022 to represent that Council District for a new four-year term. If the Councilmember chooses to run in2022 and wins a new four-year term representing the District, avacancy for the remaining two years of that Councilmember's at- large term will be filled by the City Council by appointment or special election.
3. MAPPING CRITERIA
Cities must comply with the following legally required criteria under federal and state law:
1. Each district must have substantially equal population as determined by the census,
2. Race cannot be the predominant factor or criteria when drawing districts.
3. Council districts shall not be adopted for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political pat'ry.
4. Incarcerated persons may not be counted toward a city's population, except if their last known place of residence is assigned to a census block in the city.
5. The districting plan must comply with the Federal Voting Rights Act, which prohibits districts from diluting minority voting rights and encourages a majority-minority district if the minority group is sufficiently large and such a district can be drawn without race being the predominant factor.
6. The City Council shall adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:
A. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be geographically contiguous.
Areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry service are not contiguous.
B. To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A "community of interest" is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation (e.g., school district boundaries, neighborhood boundaries, homeowners' associations, retail/commercial districts, etc.).
Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.
C. Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city.
J Page 81
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
D. To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.
4. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
The City has scheduled the required public hearings as follows:
To increase public awareness of the transition to district elections, the City has activated a variety of public communication channels to engage the Folsom community. Districting information is featured on the City's website and City newsletters. Numerous frequently asked questions have been posted on the dedicated districting webpages on the City's website.
4 Date Meeting Type Public
Hearing
Item Topic at Meeting
9ll4l202l Public Hearing 1 Completed. Public input on
composition of districts (before
maps are drawn, hold2 public
hearings on composition of
districts over period of no more
than 30 days)
tulr2l202r Public Hearing 2 Completed. Continue to receive public input on composition of
districts (must be held within 30
days of Public Hearing No. 1)
UtU2022 Public Hearing 3 Completed. Discussion of
proposed district maps. First draft
of map must be published 7 days
before Public Hearing No. 3
21812022 Public Hearing 4 Public input and identiff
preferred District
Map (hold 2 public hearings
within 45 days of Public Hearing
No. 3). Discuss sequence of
elections
212212022 Public Hearing 5 Adoption of District Map,
transition to district elections
Ordinance introduced
31812022 Regular Meeting Second reading of Ordinance
(effective 30 days after)
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
5. NEXT PUBLIC HEARING
At the fifth public hearing scheduled for February 22,2022, the City Council will adopt a final district map and introduce an Ordinance to complete the transition process. The public is encouraged to provide input via emails to [email protected]. Input may also be dropped off at City Hall. The City Council is the final decision-making body on adopting district boundaries.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The services of a demographer are required to assist the City transition to a by-district election system under specific aggressive timelines as required by the California Elections Code. Staff anticipates the cost to be approximately $40,000.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines $15061(c)(3)), or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by Public Resources Code $21065 and CEQA Guidelines $15060(c)(3) and $15378. The Council's decision regarding by-district elections meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No environmental review is required.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Two maps prepared by the City's demographer based on City Council guidance at the January I l, 2022, meeting
2. Eight focus maps selected by the City Council at the January 11,2022, meeting
3. Sequencing Scenarios
4. Public comment on review of 8 district maps
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Wang, City Attorney
5 Page 83
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
ATTACHMENT 1
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
Folsom 2022 Districting Map layers
1.-l Noc zot
Landmark Area
ij i lw.trar""
-o- Pipeline/Power Line
* Railtoad
Rivet
' Streete
" LandmarL Point
NDC 2AI
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
NDC 201
Dlrlricl 2 3 4 5 Totrl
Total Pop 14,8€6 15,033 14,636 15,352 1!.,t31 76,030
Doviation iom ldrsl
% DeviEtion
-122
-0.81% l
25 0,17t6
-372
a,46%
31'l
210%
123
0.829r
716
1,?7%
Totsl Pop
% Hl8p
% NH vlllllo
% NH Bleck
% Asian-Amcd€n
ta.3le
60tT
2*
tt*
11%
72gl
2V.
gVo
9% 10%
52%
2%
32%
12,
6016
2%
23.to
t19t
5S%
2%
2?Vo
50%
2!a
35%
Citizen Volin0 Age Pop
Tql.al 10,167 12,085 7,le0 5,782 0,553 1E E
804
78%
1o/o
120h
11Vo
8t%
1%
69o
I
67%
1 22%
11%
670h
2%
t8%
8%
73Vo
1%
18%
rolt
t3!t
r16
tala
% Hisp
% NH l /hitt
% NH Slack
V6 Aal€nlPsc.lil.
Volu Rs0irtElion
(Nov 2020)
Tohl t,ll{ t0,897 e,u2 0.t60 t,!6t 48,28s
I lruno ot
.,189J$h.qrmrfild
* Aarn Sunuird
tt Rfitioc.smrmld
tl t*l Whilr dl
l| tiH Elrct
e*
9ra
C*
ilt
e:t*
t$
lq
t*
3n
$t
878
l*
Eoh
6 'ttlo
2ga
720/r
1q"
0ta
6tt
t0t0
2*
78n
2'L
7%
't
896
1%
821/0
1%
$o/t
80 8'/o
16/6
alvo
t.h
VotorTumout
(Nov 2020)
Total 7,S55 9,7E6 8A20 8,11S ' 8,691 12,0tX
* L!!no 6!t
* Splnlrh$urnrmrd
t{&bFsumffrrd
9tFfiptloslllffird
tt NH Writ. lrt
* l{H 6bct
goa
9%
6%
1%
63%
104
7o/o
3Vo
1Vo
8g%
1%
|Yo
8%
13%
2ra
73%
1%
a%
t?t
8ll
2$
t0t6
2*
7|to
l*
8ra
lta
t3r6
Itt
8!6
89t
ttt
ilt
cltg
Itt
Volor Tumoul
(Nov 2018)
Totsl 5,€55 ?,652 : 5,251 5,836 6.551 30,085
!i Lrtno rlt
l$ Sp.d$asutfirtnld
LAdllrSurilmrd
!6 FitFhesumn.d
.t NB Vvt{t! 6l
.t tlH g8d(!L
8%
80/"
5%
10h
85%
1 8%
5%
2V.
1 89%
1%
6%
E%
2*
7gVr
'tv.
816
7%
8%
1%
8l%
2y"
lts
tt6
8t6
ltt
E4t3
tt3
7%
7C,
1%
u%
1q"
ACS Pop- Est. Told 15,630 15,14a 12,287 1,1,83,0 15,143 73.33S Age
sgso-'lg
ag!20{0
8qs60plu3
zgv.
530/0
16%
204/.
49Va
31%
33%
54.h
13%
2SV"
57%
15%
2AEr
s1u.
1A'fr
28%
93%
190h
lmmlgration
immigr!ntr
nelurellzed
15V.
47%
11%
u./.
22fo 16lo
5A%
2'loa 17V.
65% 50% 55t6
LEngusg! ipoksn at home
anglish
!psnirh
8C8n.18n0
olherlsno
80oto
Ao/t
7%
50h
gltl
5T
394
6t
?2./o
5%
12Vo
14"h
710h
4.t
119o
1 16/0
71%
3%
120/n
11%
77./6
5%
904
g%
Lan0urgo Fluoncy Speskr Enq, 'Lctr thrn Vory W€ll 70/. 3% 5.h 87o 5lo 5lo Edumtion
(amono those 696 25+)
h8-grsd
bBchelor
gradust€degree
SSV,
?86h
16%
3S%
30%
15%
21%
3EVo
299o
270/o
340h
270,/.
270h
310/o
2A%
tlVo
$eh
22%
Child in Houshold child-underlE 38% 25% 510h 410/o 4lo/" 3A% Pct ot Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 60% 70% 720/" 69% 670/o 1?0t6
16%
13%
449a
14 120/"
14%
14%
14%
1€%
4%
60/a
8%
1g!/1
340/r
7lt
9%
1AVo
53%
17%
7'to
90h
't0%
21V.
9%
1 10h
12oto
18 t€%
Household lMme
in@mo O25k
lf,6me 2$50k
ln@m6 50"75k
lncoms 7$200k
lnaom€ 20ok-plus
Housing Strt8
BInglr lrmlly
multl.family
rsnted
ryned
740to
260/.
39%
6r%
82%
I 8it
2e%
71%
slvo
e%
1E%
62%
TSYr
21%
32%
68%
74r$
26%
30%
7lga
79V1
2101"
30%
70%
Totrlpopldalion d.h tromlhE 2020 D.cilni€l Cen.6
Sumtm+blld Vole.RElslralion and Tumout dda kom the calllornh sld#d. oalek urfirg c€hls Popdetl$ Oepsdhenl lndor@untdiid! NH mito end NH Blaok lmmbratld, ,d dh.r d.mo!Ephl6 lim lhc 201t2018 Amadc.n Communly Sldey .nd EFdal T€hlrlion ty€er data
Ctizen Voling 48. Pop, Agc,
Maotltude'ro'nffi4 01/31/2O22 14:14 Page 1 of 'l
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
Folsom 2022 Districting Map layers
[-- rrtoc zoz
LandmatkArea
ll I l7at"t Ar."
+ Pipeline/Powerline
* Railroad
Rivet
Streets
, Landmark Point
NDC 202
rf
5 12021 CALIPER
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
NDC 202
Dslrict
Tolal Pop
2 3 Totsl4 5
30015,t2| I 15,343 15,259 1
Deviatlon lrom id€sl
% Deviation
-ss3 251 252
-a.a20a 1.a7Eo 1.95%
113
o-75%
,l,328
8.85%
335
2,230h
Totrl Pop
% Hisp
% NH Wtlle
% NH Bleck
% AElan.Amiridn
11,1%
58%
30/t
18%
12 72%
2%
Ola
9o/r
51%
2 35%
l07o
50%
2lo
31%
12%
5t%
2%
20%
11Vo
Serh
2%
23%
Totrl 10,512 12,217 7,011 S,715 9,800 49,288
Citizen Votlng Ag6 Fop
* Hlrp
% NH $rhlta
* NH 8aC(
tt AdtrvAald.
11q6
73%
2 12%
11%
a10a
1%
6%
8%
76%
't%
1304
100h
73%
,1Vo
110h
I 0%
85% 67%
1% 1%
2,oh 20%
Totsl 9,347 11,161 A,757 9,131 9,E63 48,2s9
Votrr RagiElrrtlon
(Nov 2020)
% Lstino $t,
% Spanjsh-Sumwrd
t6 ArlrFsrln.rtror,
Y. Filiplno-9umamed
% NH mit€ s8l.
% NH Blrck
9ql
g%
6%
1%
a20h
2%
r
ttt
3*
i!i
6lr
1*
80h
7%
13%
20h
73lo
10/"
s%
av
1 10/o
zVo
77vo
1V.
704
7%
a%
10/o
83%
1%
8%
a%
8%
104
81%
1'/o
Totd 6,116 5,927 7,963 8,122 6,654 42,9A2
(Nov 2020)
VolerTumoul
% LsUno ell
V' Spanish.9umem€d
t{Adan€uminld
% Filipino"Sum6m€d
% NH Vliit€ est.
% NH Elack
9p/.
9%
5%
1%
82%
2%
7. 7%
30/o
10t
88%
1o/o
80/o
a%
120/"
2./r
74%
1%
9Vo
8%
l10h
2%
7A%
'lvo
7%
7%
8%
1 83%
10/"
aoh
8%
6%
10 81%
1%
Tot8l 5,552 7,771 4,957 5.888 6.7A7 30.985
Vot€r Tumout
(Nov 2018)
% Lqtlno €.t.
o/o Spanish-Sumsmed
',t Aai8n-gurrumd
% FilipinGSummcd
% NH Whilo e8i.
Yo NH Blad( e8l,
6%
E%
50/.
10h
uv,
20A
5%
6%
3%
1lo
89%
1 adyo
a%
10%
20/a
TSoh
t%
6%
Ao/r
9o/o
1%
00%
1lo
tv
7*
6t6
r9t
r5*
I
7%
704
6%
I
utr
1%
ACS Pop- Ert. Tot6l 15,775 11,l2l 11,701 14,711 15,125 73,339 Age
8grG19
sge20-ll0
8o880Dlus
290/.
51ro
1E%
34%
53%
130/o
29olo
57Vo
14%
20.vo
530/o
't9%
28%
53%
leto
2n'*
aB*
3r*
lmmlgretlon
immiOrsntg
natuaelized
22o/o
a4%
14%
40%
12%
64ola
20%
eo%
210h
50%
17%
557o
Languagq gpoken at home
onglish
Epanish
asian-lang
olh€r lanq
a2%
7Vo
gvo
50/,
85%
5%
410
690
3%
16%
13%
72qo
3Vo
12Vo
12lo
76%
5%
9vo
11 7704
5o/o
9%
9%
Lsnguage fluency Sprrlc Eng.'Lcrr lh.n Very W.ll" Solo 3Yo 5% 6Vo 6% 5% Edustlon
(.mong thor6 eg6 25+)
h&gr8d
bechelor
graduatodogroc
40%
28V4
16Vo
390/6
30%
16%
19lo
41%
29Vo
25lo
34%
27V6
28%
35%
27%
31%
339i
22 Child ln Housahold child.underlS 41uth 38% 3E%3S% 260/.
Pct ot Pop. AgE 16+ rmployed 6896 87!66896 6096 70% 't00/.
Hous€hold lncome
lnm&26t
hmr25-601
lncqio 5O75k
ncsn! 7t20dr
hcmc 2ookdur
12%
13%
12%
4A.h
'160/o
129.
'r4%
110
44%
lAoh
4%
6%
9j6
516/o
31%
60/o
7%
11%
51%
20%
8%
t396
1t%
4SVn
lgoa
9%
r1%
12%
ilS%
1e%
Housing Slst!
sin0l€ family
multi.tamlly
rentod
owned
alYo
lSVr
340/.
66%
62%
1A%
8%
71%
glv.
7%
140/.
a8'/6
78 22tto
x1%
69%
68%
u%
40.h
800h
7Ao/t
21%
30v6
70v6
fobl FBLllon dlla lrom lhr 2020 Orohnld 9016
Blhtma.b.Ed Voltr F!!lrbalbn.nd T!r^o!tdd. ltoh lha Cdllohh SlC.wid! o.ltbal dt
tromlh.2015-201S Ancrliln Communlty Suey ddftunla.rlldlad by can!6
CilzM Vollr.f Atr PoF. A!..
Q'f, 0rpdmrnl und!rcounl
Maotlftde'r.rffihl 01/31/2022 14:16 Page 1 of 1
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
B. Cline ,. ,i il
l:: , -i. .
ri.i '
Fl Dorarll Hri[:;
i:nl5ii:: i.
l?{'r rnr rrn rl
'lluti
i"" '
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
H lro l,s()il'l
Yorjr t{rnr(, flih frrfor) vrrrrr tmarl .rn(t/dr phone Number:
An orrlrne verilorl of thls rrrap witll
more detarl rs avarlable ai
www,l ol s om. co, us /di st ri cte le cti ons.
tJss a tltrr k. d.:rk-col(,retl pen to draw
yot.lr fnap.
Drop oIf or rtlatl your rrrnt;rlclcd tnap
to the Iolsotn Cily Attorrtey's Offic0,
fjolsotrt Ciry ll.tll,50 N,rtonta Streel or
enrdil lo otlYdePt@lotsom. co,u5.
CIT Y OF
Ot:TlNCTtvE 6Y NAIURE
Use this m6p to outline the Rve distrirtr you feel would best reprcsent each area's population^ The number in each outllned area indlcates the total population of that "population unit." Each disrrici rnrJst be as close as possibie to ttre same population' with no nrore than a 1,Soo-person difference between the largest and smallesi districts. lf perfectly divided, each district in Folsom would have 15,008 people.
Bv-District Elections
ftpet-M-F Drawing Kit
Populatlon Eoscd Ccnsus Arcas
(T) Aneri"* E,vc'o finyon / o ld Fote otr
: tS,1Os
@ ent" I Fllson
6 " Htq6l
Froi,z 6n ht
liJn'to-.1 Sta
= tr lg6
/
BraJsl"e
' ld) 466
Itmote o
E"iI
z ldz2Z
I t,tlri,, ,,,'-' \r r'r,, r1.,, ri
1896
2258
11:t7
386
f+tr;rr -\litt
02 0
20t8
;
2{47
6 o
2170
!
c
I
.?.4
6 ,
t
..cf'.
2 a
a
t8g82
aa
704&
t380
1f82
7nt32t
2209
2845
lt38
w2
762
tlf,8
2U
tt60
r266
1912
1880
t!,.
1el1
tt00
60r
tcar888
3071
1696
t390
Porar {it.ir-
2576
878
-1o'* --t
820
0$4tI
2t
0 l2a2
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
D:150
R
ea6
t:
f
't':1,07r
a7E
R 665
t t,175
0301
R tr'g
tet:]l
D!42a$66
0:557
e/$tltl'ft
OtZE
R 1!lC
R. Goss,
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
W F() I,IJ()N,I
CIT Y OF
OISTI}ICTIVE SY NATURE
Your Name: R. Bulaoa
0 2018
By-District Elections
_Papqr Map Drawing Kit
Population Essed Census Areos
Use this map to outline the five districts you feel would best represent each area'spopulation. The number in each outlinedarea indicates the totbl population of that"population unit." Each dlstrict must be as close as possible to thi sbme population,wlth no more than a 1,s0o-person dlfference betwein the largest and smallestdlstricts. lf perfectly divlded, each dlstrlct in Folsom would hdve t5,008 people.
Your Email and/or Phone Number:
385
1g0e
t04
StI
l, ."v'
IIItII
1942 r
1880
234
IIf
rlrr
r0e8
579 1841
1390
IIi 2678
ta-artia
878
(ir.rphrr,s 202 I ( Al ll)l ll ( orpr)r,ttio,),
Nalioildl [)cnro Or:tohr"-r ?t], 2 O) I
Pn nt X6...
aa'/""t'
An onllne version of this map with
more detail is available at
www,f o I s o m, cs, us / d i s t r i cte le ct io n s, Use a thick, dark-colored pen to draw
your tnap.
Drop off or mail your completeci nlap
to f he Folsom Clty Attorney's Offlcc,
Folsont City Hall, 50 Natorna Streel or
erna i I to ottyde pt@folso m, co, us.
a
I
a
o
.c
Fo
I
IIII
a
II
)t
2t
ltlt
,
i.-L
tt21
1l8S
7t0
1131
Srra
1182
2258 781
3182
777
7e22846
2n8
\
r9it8
tu
1886
1806
3071
820
a
It80
t'1000
861
!rrr
t'! nnz 15341 0
50 --a.aa-"!ttt'
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
N. Dooley
fi;r,:',',rl
{:| []oi,rrirr llill',
'a
1.,
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
ti
H
.''}
\:
3 (;
'(_
I
|.
'/.<
r(
4 ti
it
,l
'
f--,
50 Folsom 2022 Districting Map layers
l-- I Noc ror
Landmarkfuea
, I I ,WaterArea
-+ Pipeline/Powerline
* Railroad
Rivet
Streets
* Landmark Point
NDC 101
i
I r'
,/
o^
I
F
,..1. .t'./
't
\ \
.2OPI CATIPER
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
Folsom 2022 Districting Map layers
l- -l Noc rom
Landmarkfuea
I7ater Area
----+- Pipeline/Power Line
* Railroad
River
SEeets
' Landmark Point
NDC 1O1A
I
Statd'&&tl
r{96
'.O\.r? '\
,i\
!
c
,]
E Natoma St
i.,'
'"'ir !
):
/
sau\ne
I' I
, \t
,.1 -
-i
]J
ir
- g\-9
$d \
I.l
ti
lrr
l_
'f
I
I
l
I
I
t
.l
T.,, 'rL
1-t
ji
'/'l
',| o
it j'.i )
50 1on
I
,. 1l
I
'\
12021 CALIPER
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
2 r ri
I
+'
4 50
Folsom 2022 Districting Map layers ;
ll rrroc rorn
Landmarkfuea
'lWater Arca
-+ Pipeline/Pou'erline
* Raikoad
Rivet
Stteets
- Landmark Point
NDC 1O1B
3I Dr
1"
I
J. \
i
,,
I
'l
I
t_- o
I
tt;ir
I
t\
I
,l
t
n
_ ,.,.o.{
02021 CALIPE
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
ATTACHMENT 3
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
NDC Sequencing Scenarios
Natiornl Demographics Corporation
E
Tlerm ends in 2022
Term ends in 2024
Runs for election in district at end of
curfent tefm
Option 1: Leaves office at end of curent
term n 2024. Can run @ut not as
incumbent) when district is up for
election agiln n 2026.
Option 2: In 2022, runs for by-district
seat. If elected, is sworn into by-district 4
yer term, ceating a :;'acattcy fot
remaining two years of at-large term,
which is filled by appoinffnent or special
election.
Leaves office at end of current term in
2422. Can run (but not as incumbent)
when district is up for electio n tn 2A24.
Runs for election in district at end of
cuffent tefm
-fanuary 1,?,2022
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
AfiACHMENT 4
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
Lvnn Gonzales
From:
Sent:
To:
Cheryl Davis <[email protected]>
Monday, January 31, 2022 5:50 PM
Rosario Rodrigue4 Sarah Aquino;YK Chalamcherla; [email protected]; AttorneyCitywebsiteMail; [email protected]
Robert Dresser
PUBLIC COMMENT ON REVIEW OF 8 DISTRICT N4APS
District Election Petition supportersjpg
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization, Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Mayor Howell, Members of the City Council and City Attorney Wang, We appreciate the opportunity to review the eight selected drafi district maps.
And we were pleased that Mayor Howell proposed including the Dooley map in the final review. This map is the work product of a group of Folsom residents from five ditferent neighborhoods across the city. We are two of those residents. Our group held four Zoom get-togethers between Thanksgiving and New Year's to draft a submission.
We believe the Dooley map ditfers from the other submissions in several important respects. Our group varied population only to the extent justified by the exclusive factors set forth in the statute. We did not seek to advantage any political party. We did not split communities of interest for any reason other than equalizing current population, maintaining contiguity, or respecting the integrity of a more compelling community of interest. Therefore, we did not consider where current council members reside.
The move to neighborhood elections has broad support from residents of every political afliliation from every corner of the city. Districting cannot become a partisan exercise. We took exception to a comment by former city attorney Bruce Cline at the January 11 public hearing, dismissing this map as the creation of "Dooley and her little Democratic club." We do not know the position of local Republican clubs but are aware that the Folsom Area Democratic Club circulated a petition last year at farmers' markets. We have attached a map of the registration addresses of those who signed, showing how broad the support is. The petition did feature a big blue donkey, which makes it even more remarkable that more than 40% of the signatories were NOT Democrats. The Dooley map is not a partisan map because the law does not allow drawing a map to favor a political party.
Afier the close of the recent public hearing, Councilmembers shared their thoughts about features of a district map they found important. Our group then met twice after the January 11 public hearing to review the eight flnal draft maps using Councilmember comments as a guide. Below is a review of the Dooley map in relation to the comments Councilmembers made:
District 1: The Dooley map does keep neighborhoods north ofthe river in one district. To provide enough population, we include adjacent neighborhoods in the norlh e)dending through Briggs Ranch.
District 2: The Dooley map does keep Historic Folsom in a separate district which includes surrounding older neighborhoods down through Natoma Station. The original town and neighborhoods of Folsom have unique concerns such as through traffic, parking, older infrastructure.
Disirict 3: The Dooley map keeps The Parkway and Lexington Hills together as one district.
District 4: The Dooley map groups Prairie Oaks, Wllow Springs, Broadstone to East Bidwell plus the new South of 50 neighborhoods District 5: The Dooley map does keep Empire Ranch intact.
Wth appropriate revisions to address your approach to South of 50, the Dooley map meets the Council's desired features and does the best job of respecting neighborhoods and communities of interest, consistent with other legal criteria.
Finally, we are concerned that all three consultant maps are designed to retain each current councilmember in separate districts because this appears to be at the expense of FAIR MAPS Act criteria. All three maps split neighborhoods such as Empire Ranch, Prairie Oaks and Broadstone.
Two do not create a dishict in which Asian-American voters, who are a protected class, will have strong influence. An area's relationship to an incumbent does not define a community of interest, so dividing neighborhoods or crossing major roads to separate incumbents is not appropriate. The purposes of the CVRA require lhat the high-Asian district chooses its councilmember in the same year as the presidential election, when Asian turnout has historically been higher.
We look foMard to the public hearing on February 8.
Thank you,
Cheryl Davis Robert Dresser
Hildebrand Circle Sprig Circle
Folsom Folsom
02/08/2022 Item No.12.
f*}rtltat
t8!lg6
t
O
.-- ra.6fFor !(\
txg
8t9
z}ti;JtJ
O T a
a
oOo
. {,:asi s,
I
i
i
.".t
a
o
299q6
I
!
-.i **-e.- * "
\
rt996
- 9'tg6
02/08/2022 Item No.12.