Folsom City Council
July 12, 2022

1 Agenda
City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom
Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public
Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority
/ South of 50 Parking Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 July 12, 2022
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Meeting

Folsom City Council Chambers
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA

www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, July 12, 2022 6:30 PM

Kerri Howell, Mayor

Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Effective July 7, 2022, the City of Folsom is returning to all in-person City Council, Commission, and Committee meetings. Remote participation for the public will no longer be offered.

Everyone is invited and encouraged to attend and participate in City meetings in person.

NOTE: Councilmember YK Chalamcherla will be participating in this meeting via teleconference from the following location:

1755 Abbeyfeale Court
Folsom, CA 95630

Pursuant to Section 54953 et al. of the California Government Code, members of the public shall be provided an opportunity to directly address the legislative body at the teleconference location.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

3 Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Presentation from HART of Folsom (Homeless Assistance Resource Team) Regarding the Winter Shelter
CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

2. Approval of June 28, 2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

3. Appointment of Representatives to the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) Governing Board

4. Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to Represent the Willow Springs District

5. Resolution No. 10883 - A Resolution Electing the Population and Inflation Factors and Establishing the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Appropriations Limit

6. Resolution No. 10886 - A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 10860 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Project

7. Resolution No. 10888 - A Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Completed Annual State Mandated Fire Inspections
PUBLIC HEARING:

8. Resolution No. 10887 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer’s Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge II/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs

CONVENE JOINT MEETING

JOINT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Meeting ROLL CALL: Council / Board Members: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell

4 CONSENT CALENDAR:

9. Approval of the April 12, 2022 Joint City Council and Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes

10. Approval of the May 24, 2022 Joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes
PUBLIC HEARING:

11. Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 3 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 i. Resolution No. 10884 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizing the Issuance of the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 3 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2022, the Execution of an Indenture Providing therefor, Authorizing the Execution of a Local Obligation Purchase Contract, and Authorizing Necessary Actions and the Execution of Other Documents in Connection therewith ii. Resolution No. 009-Folsom Ranch FA - A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Authorizing the Issuance, Sale and Delivery of Not to Exceed $12,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 3 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022; Approving the Form and Substance of a Trust Agreement, Authorizing Modifications thereof and Execution and Delivery as Modified; Approving a Preliminary Official Statement, Authorizing Changes thereto and Execution and Delivery thereof and of an Official Statement to be Derived therefrom; Approving a Local Obligation Purchase Contract and a Bond Purchase Contract and Execution and Delivery of Each; and Authorizing Related Actions Necessary to Implement the Proposed Financing

ADJOURNMENT

RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NEW BUSINESS:

12. General Municipal Election – November 8, 2022

1. A. Resolution No. 10889 - A Resolution Authorizing the Submission of a Ballot Measure to the Qualified Voters of the City to Add a Transactions and Use Tax at the Rate of One-Half Percent (0.5%), Authorizing the Filing of Written Arguments Regarding the City’s Revenue Measure, and Directing the City Attorney to Prepare an Impartial Analysis for Said Measure; or B. Resolution No. 10890 - A Resolution Authorizing the Submission of a Ballot Measure to the Qualified Voters of the City to Add a Transactions and Use Tax at the Rate of One Percent (1%), Authorizing the Filing of Written Arguments Regarding the City’s Revenue Measure, and Directing the City Attorney to Prepare an Impartial Analysis for Said Measure

2. A. Ordinance No. 1328 - An Ordinance of the People of the City of Folsom Imposing a One- Half Percent (0.5%) Transactions and Use Tax by Adding Chapter 3.140, “Folsom Essential City Services Maintenance and Investment Measure”, to the Folsom Municipal Code to be Administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (Approve Submission to Voters); or

5 B. Ordinance No. 1329 - An Ordinance of the People of the City of Folsom Imposing a One Percent (1%) Transactions and Use Tax by Adding Chapter 3.140, “Folsom Essential City Services Maintenance and Investment Measure”, to the Folsom Municipal Code to be Administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (Approve Submission to Voters)
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

COUNCIL COMMENTS:

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA S HOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Coun cil meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

6 This page is intentionally left blank.

[H
-il,;'{}r,F-4{t-*'tr
a &ttrGt,4a rt "lY$.ia
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

CITY COUNCII, ACTION
Representatives from HART of Folsom will make a presentation regarding their winter shelter.

Respectfu lly submitted,
Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk
I
MEETING DATE: 7/1212022
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation from HART of Folsom (Homeless Assistance Resource Team) regarding the Winter Shelter
FROM: City Clerk's Department

07/12/2022 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank.

07/12/2022 Item No.1.

Book 76 Page 265
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
Gity Council Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, June 28,2022 6:00 PM

CALL T ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Rosario Rodriguez, Vice MaYor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent
Participating Staff:

None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
lnterim Human Resources Director John Spittler
Human Resources Manager Allison Garcia
ApJOURNMENT TO qLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: lnterim Human Resources Director John Spittler. Employee Organization: Various Bargaining Groups
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to adjourn to Glosed Session for the above referenced item. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AyES: Gouncilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council' Page 9 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page 266
Folsom City Council
June28,2022

RECONVENE
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking announced that no final action was taken during Closed Session.

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:36 p.m

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council' Page 10 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page267
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
City Council Regular Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, June 28,2022 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:36 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor'
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Council mem bers Absent: None
Participating Staff: City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione
Landscaping and Lighting Manager Zach Perras

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited

AGENDA UPDATE
City Clerk Christa Freemantle announced that there were no agenda updates.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speakers addressed the City Council via teleconference:
o Scott Rafferty regarding by-district elections
. Jason Davis regarding the Folsom Navigator and Animal Control DRAFT - Not oficial until approaed b1t the Ciry Council. Page 11 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page 268
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
SCHEDULED P SENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming July 2022 as "Parks Make Life Better" Month
Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presented the proclamation to Parks and Recreation Commissioner Samantha Davidson, Management Analyst Cindy Spradlin and Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione.

2. Presentation of City Survey Results and Direction to Staff Mayor Kerri Howell invited the following speaker to address the City Council:
r Loretta Hettinger
City Manager Elaine Andersen introduced the item and Brian Godbe from Godbe Research made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Bonnie Moss from Clifford Moss Consulting made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

City Manager Elaine Andersen asked the City Councilto provide any comments and direction to staff for the next steps in the process.

The City Council agreed that an agenda item should be scheduled for the July 12 City Council meeting for the City Council to discuss if a sales tax measure should be placed on the November ballot.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

3. Approval of June 14,2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

4. pulled for comment

5. Resolution No. 10874 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 5 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom

6. pulled for comment
7 . Resolution No. 10876 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Communications Site License Agreement with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, at BT Collins Park

8. Resolution No. 10877 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Communications Site License Agreement with T-Mobile US, LLC, at BT Collins Park DRAFT - Not oficial until approued fut the Ciry Council. Page 12 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page 269
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
g. Resolution No. 10878 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Communications Site License Agreement with T-Mobile West LLC, at Cummings Family Park

10. Resolution No. 10879 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-032) with HydroScience Engineers, lnc. for Design Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 2 1 1 . Resolution No. 10880 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with HydroScience Engineers, lnc. for Construction Management Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 2

12. Resolution No. 10881 -A Resolution Authorizing the City Managerto Execute an Agreement with Caggiano General Engineering, lnc. for the Construction of the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 2 and Appropriation of Funds

13. Resolution No. 10882 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Pavement Coatings Co. for the Pavement Resurfacing Fiscal Year 2021-22 Prqect No. 8017
Motion by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez' to approve Gonsent Galendar items 3, 5 and 7-13.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
CONSENT LENDAR IT PULLED COMMENT:EM

4. Resolution No. '10873 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla pulled this item for clarification and requested that the Parks and Recreation Department consider hiring a volunteer coordinator who could find volunteers to use for landscaping and other department needs. Councilmember Sarah Aquino asked if the Landscaping and Lighting District Citizens'Advisory Committee should consider this item before the City Council approves the contract. Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione and Landscaping and Lighting Manager ZachPerras responded to Councilmember questions.

Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking provided clarification in response to questions.

Gouncilmember YK Chalamcherla made a motion to approve Resolution No. 10873 with amendments to have volunteers help with maintenance, have Parks and Recreation Commission be involved, and approve the agreement for one-year increments.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approued fui the Ciry Council. Page 13 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page270
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione explained the infeasibility of depending upon volunteers for highly skilled work and the complications of limiting the contract to one year.

Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking and Landscaping and Lighting Manager Zach Perras provided additional clarification.

Councilmember YK Ghalamcherla withdrew his motion.

Councilmember Sarah Aquino commented she would like this item to go to the Landscaping and Lighting District Citizens'Advisory Committee, so they are informed. She also concurred with using volunteers to help when appropriate, such as volunteer efforts that are part of Community Service Day Projects.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 10873.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None

6. Resolution No. 10875 - A Resolution Accepting Donated Furniture ltems for City Use Mayor Kerri Howell explained that she pulled this item to thank former Mayor Steve Miklos for donating furniture.

Motion by Mayor Kerri Howell second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, to approve Resolution No. 10875.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
GITY MANAGER REPORTS:

City Manager Elaine Andersen made announcements regarding the new food waste recycling program, the annual national night out, the new session of the Police Department's citizens academy and illegal fireworks penalties.

DRAFT - Not ofidal until approued fut the Ciry Council' Page 14 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Book 76 Page271
Folsom City Council
June28,2022
GITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:

Councilmember Sarah Aquino commented regarding roundabouts for traffic calming. She mentioned difficulties with technology at public meetings and suggested phasing out teleconferencing at the meetings.

Councilmember Mike Kozlowski said he is looking forward to hearing the results of the parking pilot program in the Historic District. He commented about the success of the Folsom Hometown Parade and invited everyone to attend the upcoming Folsom Pro Rodeo.

Councilmember YK Chalamcherla concurred with the success of the parade and expressed his support of roundabouts for traffic calming. He mentioned he will be attending the Cal Cities conference, and he thanked the City for having cooling station locations.

Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez also praised the Folsom Hometown Parade and invited everyone to the Folsom Pro Rodeo.

Mayor Kerri Howell spoke about a recent car accident and encouraged everyone to drive safely and to be careful with fireworks over the holiday weekend.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Kerri Howell adjourned the meeting at 8:21 pm.

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST
Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approued bit the Ciry Council. Page 15 07/12/2022 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank.

07/12/2022 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff R ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COIINCII, ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint Environmental and Water Resources Development Director Marcus Yasutake as the City of Folsom's primary representative, with Mayor Kerri Howell and Utilities Section Manager Todd Eising serving as the altemate representatives to the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) Governing Board for four-year terms.

BACKGROUND / ISST]E
The City of Folsom was involved as a stakeholder in the Sacramento Area Water Forum and the subsequent Water Forum Successor Effort. City staff participated in the development of the Central Sacramento Groundwater Management Plan and recommendations as to how the basin would be managed. In2006, the City Council authorized a newly updated Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of Elk Grove, Folsom, Sacramento and Rancho Cordova and the County of Sacramento creating the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority. The SCGA's purpose is to implement groundwater management policies embodied in the Groundwater Management Element and to maintain the sustainable yield of the North Area Basin.

POLICY / RTJLE
Pursuant to the 2006 Joint Powers Agreement, the City of Folsom's representative on the SCGA's Governing Board shall be appointed by the City Council and shall serve a four-year term. 1 MEETING DATE: 0711212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Appointment of Representatives to the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) Governing Board
F'ROM: City Clerk's Department

07/12/2022 Item No.3.

ANALYSIS
Continued participation on the SCGA Goveming Board will help ensure that the City of Folsom remains an active participant in the groundwater planning efforts in the region. Environmental and Water Resources Development Director Marcus Yasutake has served as the City of Folsom's primary representative, with Mayor Kerri Howell and Utilities Section Manager Todd Eising serving as the alternate representatives to the SCGA Governing Board.

Submitted,
Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk
2 Page 18
07/12/2022 Item No.3.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff requests that the Mayor appoint Ajit Natu (with approval from the City Council) to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to represent the Willow Springs District for the term ending in December 2024.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 16.56 establishes the Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee (L&L Committee) and defines the Committee's purpose as helping to enhance the line of communication between city staff and elected/appointed city bodies. The citizens' committee may also make recommendations to the Landscaping and Lighting District Manager, the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director concerning the maintenance and associated costs to maintain and improve landscaping and lighting districts.

The Committee is comprised of one person from each landscaping and lighting district. The members shall be registered voters and residents or owners within their respective landscaping and lighting district and serve for a period of four years.

POLICY/ RULE
Folsom Municipal Code Section 16.56.030(8) states that the mayor shall appoint each of the members, subject to the approval of the City Council.
1 MEETING DATE: 71t212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to Represent the Willow Springs District
FROM: City Clerk's Department

07/12/2022 Item No.4.

ANALYSIS
The L&L Committee continues to have vacancies for certain districts, and staff maintains an open recruitment for these vacancies. One application has recently been received for the Willow Springs District vacant seat:

Staff has confirmed that the applicant's address is within the Willow Springs District and that the applicant is a registered voter and they are therefore eligible to be appointed.

ATTACHMENT
Application from Aj it Natu
Respectfully submitted,
Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk
2 Page 20
07/12/2022 Item No.4.
. : ' '1",:'. i . :i -i ,1- i.1:1.11,
i .l:,tai.f ar r,ltr Pa
Folsom Commission and Committee

APPLICATION
Thankyou foryour interest in serving on a Folsom commission or committee.

BeforeYouBegin:
. Please read this form and instructions carefully.
. Complete all pages and sign the application.
. Applications remain active for six months after submittal.

Return completed applications to:

City Clerk's Department, Folsom City Hall, 5o Natoma Street, Folsom, CA gS6go Applicant Information: (All information is required)
Name: Ajit Natu
Residence Address: Folsom, CA, 95630
Email: [email protected]
Phone:

Employer and Occupation: lBM, Service
Currently Serving on a Commission/Committee? If yes, please specifr:

No
Folsom Residency / Registered Voter Verification: Commission and Committee members must be residents and registered voters of Folsom.

Registered to vote? Indicate Yes / No Yes
Financial Disclosure / Ethics Training:

I understand that commission and committee members must file statements disclosing financial information.

I understand that commission and committee members must complete ethics and harassment training.

Indicate Yes / No:

Yes
Indicate Yes / No:

Yes
Truth and Accuracy: I certiff that the information contained on this form is true and accurate:

Signature Ajit D Natu
Digitally signed by Ajit D Natu
Dale: 2O22.06.23 1 0: 1 9:36 -07'00' Date: 0612312022
Important Public Records fnformation: The city may receive requests from the public to review documents such as this form and the city is obligated to release these public records, including all information contained on the form.

Updated January 2022

07/12/2022 Item No.4.

FOLSOM COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION
ApplicantName: Ajit Natu
Choice of Commissionor Committee:
(If you are interested in multiple commissions, please rank them numerically according to your preference) Arts and Culture Commission
Historic District Commission"
Please identiff which seat you qualiff for:
representative who is actively involved with historic preservation representative who is a resident of the Historic District representativewho owns a business within the Sutter Street Subarea Planning Commissioners
representative from a Historic District business outside the Sutter Street Subarea architect, landscape architect, or other design professional with expertise in historic preservation x Landscaping and Lighting DistrictAdvisory Committee"
Please advise which L&L District you live in:

Districtof Residence' Willow Springs Neighborhood
LibraryCommission
Parks and Recreation Commission
Planning Commission
Traffi c Safety Committee*
Please identifr which seat you qualifu for:
representative representing a wide cross section of interests representative who has demonstrated an interest in or a concern for pedestrian and bicycle safety Utility Commission
Other:
*Application Supplement Required:

Supplemental information is required for the Historic District Commission, Landscape and Lighting District Advisory Committee, and the Traffic Safety Committee. These boards have special qualification requirements for certain seats.

Continueto nextpage
Page2 of 4

07/12/2022 Item No.4.

FOLSOM COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION
ApplicantName: Ajit Natu
fnformational Questions: (you must answer all four questions, for all commissions or committees you are applying for):
r. Why do you want to serve on this commission or committee:

I am a Folsom Residence for last 15 years and I love Folsom. My goal is to help my city to be clean, beautiful, and improve the living of its residence and also importantly be mindful about the cost saving, unnecessary waste of energy and overall decor and functioning of the city, roads, road lighting that help traffic. Optimum lighting of the roads reduces risk of accidents.

At the same time, the City and neighborhoods should be clean where residents look fonrvard to be on the road, feel pleasant while driving and walking, especially when children are accompanied. We teach children through our own action - and cleanliness, tidiness of roads is an indirect teaching. z. What do you think is(are) the top issue(s) facing this commission or committee:

1. Optimum Road Lighting - When I go for a walk, agreed that City has taken lot of efforts to have roads lighted but still we encounter sudden portion of a longer road section that is dark which could be a risk to residents. lt may due to light bulb worn out, damaged or not in place. Sometimes, I do observe that.

2. Adequate lighting and proper signals and stop signs, speed breakers help the traffic flow but more importantly the safety of residents and reducing the accidents. I understand the analysis must be done to evaluate if a STOP sign is needed or signal is needed or a speed breaker is needed but depending on the traffic, location, it proves to be a safety and a good investment because even one life saved is worth the expenses.

3. Landscaping is very important though not many people realize it. A broken sprinkler can waste lot of water and can cause annoyance to the people who walk by. City workers may not be able to cover every small area for such observation and this is where the Activist or volunteers help as they can report such occurrences more easily and promptly. ln today's day and age where water is scarce and fear of drought is around. such local help is advisable and it is a great initiative by City to name such volunteers. Some residents have sprinklers every day, multiple times and over watering is done which also can be reported back.

Continueto nextpage

07/12/2022 Item No.4.

FOLSOM COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION
ApplicantName: Ajit Natu

3. Briefly describe how your experiences qualifu you to serve on the commission or committee:

I am very active in social life; I have been involved in the local lndian Association of Sacramento (lAS) for last 17 years and was its President and currently the Chairman, board of trustee. We serve the local community, invite local civil leadership to our events and I have attended several city meetings to see how the working is. Why I am saying this? To show that I am a concerned US citizen, a proud Folsom resident who have been doing work in social arena and want to improve the living standards of the locality. From time to time, I observe few items that I described above (such as lights not adequate or sprinkler issues etc), and I always wanted to do something about it. With this position, I will be able to be the medium to take the local issues to the city, I will be the 'can-do-it'for the local neighborhood residents if they want to report any issues. I want to help them and the city. My experience in social arena and also my mindset, character to help entities where we live will come in handy and it does qualify me for this position.

4. Which commission or committee meetings have you attended? I have attended several City consul meetings at the City Hall. I was/am impressed how Folsom city consul works, very systematic, with all due diligence and mainly I enjoyed the question by citizens (l think each Tuesday). One of the meeting had one issue discussed about the need for Signals on Empire Ranch road. City had done such a thorough analysis, data-driven, accident records, money required and so on due to which the city leaders were able to judge the issue not just qualitatively but also quantitatively and take the decision based on real data. Today, when I drive on that road, I see why it was important to have signals (people used to drive at crazy speeds before). Though this is one example that has stuck in my mind but I enjoyed several such meetings. I attended such meetings out of self interest and to be a responsible Folsomite!

END OFAPPLICATIONFORM
Return completed applications to:

City Clerk's Department, Folsom City Hall, 5o Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 9563o

07/12/2022 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10883 - A Resolution Electing the Population and Inflation Factors and Establishing the FY 2022-23 Appropriations Limit.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Gann Spending Limitation Initiative (Article XIII B of the State Constitution) adopted as Proposition 4 in June 1979 (and subsequently modified by Proposition 111 in June 1990), requires the City to annually adopt a resolution setting an appropriations limit for the upcoming fiscal year. The Gann Spending Limitation was intended to provide citizen control of government spending and taxation.

The City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operuting Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CP) was adopted by the City Council on June 14,2022.

POLICY / RULE
California Government Code. Section 7910 (a) "each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit and make other necessary determinations for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution at aregularly scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting...." 1 MEETING DATE: 71t212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10883 - A Resolution Electing the Population and Inflation Factors and Establishing the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Appropriations Limit
FROM: Finance Department

07/12/2022 Item No.5.
(-olifnmi a (-nncfifrrfinn A*1nlo XIIIB Qan 1 "The total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior year adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population, except as otherwise provided in this article.

Folsom Municipal Code, Section 3.02.030. Budeet
"An Annual Budget shall be prepared by the City Manager, with the assistance of the Finance Director. . . . (G) The City Council shall adopt the annual budget by Resolution by fund and program by affirmative vote of at least three members, on or before the last working day of the last month of the current fiscal year. If the City Council fails to adopt the budget by the last working day of the current fiscal year, the budget as presented by the City Manager shall be deemed adopted."

ANALYSIS
Information from the California Department of Finance regarding population and per capita personal income has now been received and the calculation for the Gann Spending Limitation is attached. The establishment of the 2022-23 Appropriations Limit ("Gann Limit") is necessary to comply with Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. The Gann Limit limits the amount of revenue classified as proceeds of taxes that can be appropriated in any fiscal year by a government entity. Certain exclusions are allowed including transfers, capital outlay and payments for debt service. The maximum allowable appropriation of revenues subject to limitations for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is $123,204,502, and the FY 2022-23 Budget with the exclusions, referenced above, is within this limit. This maximum amount increases or decreases each year depending on the percentage change in the per capita personal income (7.55%) and the percentage change in population (1.33%). The California Department of Finance has estimated the total population for the City of Folsom as of January 1, 2022 .as 84,592, and after deducting prison population the estimated populationis79,758. The formula for calculating the limits was based on the Fiscal Year 1978-79 "base year" revenues. For Fiscal Year 2022-23 the budgeted revenues subject to limitation total $78,987,577, which is $44,216,925 less than the maximum allowed.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10883 - A Resolution Electing the Population and Inflation Factors and Establishing the FY 2022-23 Appropriations Limit

2. Gann Appropriations Limit for FY 2022-23
Submitted,
2 Tamagni, Finance Director/CFO

07/12/2022 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 1

07/12/2022 Item No.5.

RESOLUTION NO. 10883

A RESOLUTION ELECTING THE POPULATION AND INFLATION FACTORS AND ESTABLISHING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022.23 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WHEREAS, Section 3.02.030 of the Folsom Municipal Code states "An Annual Budget shall be prepared by the City Manager, with the assistance of the Finance Director . . ."; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required by Government code 7910 to establish its appropriations limit by resolution and approve the appropriate inflation and population factors used in the calculation of the limit; and
WIIERDAS, oh the l4th day of June 2022, the City Council approved the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Budget sets forth the "Proposition 4 Appropriations Limitation Schedule", computed using the City population growth factor of 1.33%o and the California Per Capita personal income change factor of 7 .55% as determined by the State of California, Department of Finance, for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 of the City of Folsom; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit has been available to the public in the City Clerk's Office for fifteen days prior to the meeting; and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom's appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2022-23 shall be $123,204,502.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom that the Gann Appropriations Limit is approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of July 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10883
Page I of I

07/12/2022 Item No.5.

ATTACHMENT 2

07/12/2022 Item No.5.

RESOURGES

PROCEEDS OF TA)GS
Property Taxes
Sales Taxes
Special Taxes
State Subrcntions
Franchise Taxes
Business Licenses
$ 36,050,672
27,900,289
4,200,000
9,116,898
722,OOO
801,850

APPROPRIATIONS
SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS:
$ 78,791,709
195,868
NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS:

TOTAL PROCEEDS OF TA)GS
lnterest lncome
TOTAL SUBJECTTO LIMITATIONS $ 78,987,577 $ 78,987,577
$ 78,791,7O9
195,868

NON-PROCEEDS OF TA)GS
$ 2,982,587
13,724,606
29,048,244
52,475,276
21,680,299
18,514,259
TOTAL NON.PROCEEDS OF ALL
TA)GS 138,425,271 138,425,271
$217,412,848TOTAL ALL RESOURCES g 217, 412,U8
Maximum allowable appropriation subject to limitations 2022-2023 fiscal year Less: Total appropriation subject to limitation lor 2022-2O23 fiscal year BALANCE UNDER ARTICLE XIIB LIMlr
General Fund not financed
with proceeds of taxes
Special Rerenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise Funds
lnternal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Miscellaneous General Funds
$123,204,502
(78,987,577\
44,216,925$

07/12/2022 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 10886 - A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 10860 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On May 24,2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 10860, which authorized the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with Cooper Oats Air Conditioning (COAC) for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Project.

Due to a discrepancy, the bidders were not specifically notified that the contract was being considered for award by the City Council at its meeting on May 24,2022.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, City Council approval is required for contracts in excess of $66,141.

In accordance with Section 2.18 of the City of Folsom's Standard Construction Specifications and as stated in the Request for Proposals on this project, all bidders must be provided with notice of the date and time of the City Council meeting at which the award of the contract for the project will be considered. All bidders must be provided with an I
MEETING DATE: 7n212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10886 - A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 10860 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Cooper Oates Air
Conditioning for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC
Replacement Design-Build Proj ect
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

07/12/2022 Item No.6.
opportunity to bring to the City Council's attention disputes and/or protests regarding the bidding process.

ANALYSIS
In order to address the discrepancy in notiffing all bidders about the date and time of the City Council meeting at which the award of the contract for this project was considered, it is necessary to rescind Resolution No. 10860 at this time. Staff will bring this item back to the City Council at its regular meeting on July 26,2022, for consideration of the award of the contract for this project after providing proper notice of that meeting to all bidders.

On June 20,2022, COAC was notified in writing that the City suspended the award of the contract pending further action by the City Council.

Also on June 20, 2022, all bidders were notified that the Council will consider award of the contract on July 26,2022.

On June 27,2022, a bid protest was received on this project. Any protesting bidder will be given the opportunity to bring its disputes and protests to the City Council for consideration on July 26,2022.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact on the general fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action by the City Council is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Review for Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10886 - A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 10860 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Project

2. Resolution No. 10860 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning, Inc. for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Proj ect
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Director
Parks & Recreation Department
2 Page 32
07/12/2022 Item No.6.

ATTACHMENT 1

07/12/2022 Item No.6.

RESOLUTION NO. 10886
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 108600 A RESOLUTION

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION

AGREEMENT WITH COOPER OATES AIR CONDITIONING FOR THE F'OLSOM CITY HALL BOILER AND HVAC REPLACEMENT DESIGN.BUILD PROJECT WHEREAS, on May 24, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No 10860 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning for the Folsom City Hall Boiler and HVAC Replacement Design-Build Project; and
WHEREAS, due to a discrepmcy, the bidders were not specifically notified that the contract was being considered for award by the City Council at its meeting on May 24,2022; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 2.18 of the City of Folsom's Standard Construction Specifications and the Request for Proposals on this project, all bidders must be provided an opportunity to bring to the City Council's attention disputes and/or protests regarding the bidding process.

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom that Resolution No. 10860 is hereby rescinded in its entirety.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of July 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10886
Page I of I Page 34
07/12/2022 Item No.6.

ATTACHMENT 2

07/12/2022 Item No.6.

RESOLUTION NO. TOE6O

A RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH COOPER OATES AIR CONDITIONING, INC. FOR THE FOLSOM

CITY HALL BOILER AND HVAC REPLACEMENT DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has validated the need to replace the existing HVAC, Boiler, and HVAC control systems that have reached the end of their useful life; and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom HVAC and Boiler Replacement Project will not add any new or significant adverse rmpacts and is therefore exempt under Article 19 Section 1500.1 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS' this project was publicly advertised on April 14, 2022, and the bids were received on May 3,2022,withCooper Oates Air Conditioning,Inc. being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, funds were budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021-22, withfunds received from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for this project and are currently available; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RXSOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes:

1. The City Manager to execute a contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of $947,825 with Cooper Oates Air Conditioning, Inc. for the City Hall HVAC and Boiler Replacement Project.

2. The City Manager, or designee, to approve project change orders not-to-exceed $142,173 for work associated with unanticipated HVAC infrastructure or structural conditions. The total project budget will be for a not to exceed amount of $1,089,998.; pASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Howell
None
None
None
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Resolution No, 10860
Page I of I
Freemantle, CITY CLERK

07/12/2022 Item No.6.

Folsom Clty Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Fire Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10888 - A Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Completed Annual State Mandated Fire Inspections.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Existing law (CA Health & Safety Code $ 13146.3) requires the Chief of Folsom Fire Department and/or their authorized representatives to inspect every building used as a public or private school within the City of Folsom not less than once each year, for the purpose of enforcing Califomia fire code building standards.

Existing law (CA Health & Safety Code $ 13146.2) requires the City of Folsom Fire Department to annually inspect certain structures, including hotels, motels, lodging houses, and apartment houses, for compliance with fire code building standards.

Senate Bill 1205 requires that the mandated annual inspections be reported to the "administering authority" (City of Folsom City Council).

POLICY / RULE
Section 13146.4 has been added to the California Health & Safety Code requiring the City of Folsom Fire Department to report its compliance with Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 annually to the City Council.

I
MEETING DATE: 711212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10888 - A Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Completed Annual State Mandated Fire Inspections
FROM: Fire Department

ANALYSIS

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

Fire Department prevention Division has completed all initial inspections pursuant to Sections Bl46.t and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety Code as outlined in Auachment2.

Those occupancies found to be in violation of the Folsom Fire Code have either made the necessary corrections or are in the process of correcting applicable Fire Code violations; re- inspections will continue until all Fire Code violations are corrected.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is nominal fiscal impact as fire prevention staff are required, through state mandates, to inspect the specified buildings as described.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review.

ATTACHMENTS
l. ResolutionNo. 10888 - A Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Completed Annual State Mandated Fire Inspections

2. Completed State Mandated Inspections List
Submitted,
Ken Cusano, Fire Chief
2 Page 38
07/12/2022 Item No.7.

Attachment I
Resolution No. 10888 - A Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Completed Annual State Mandated Fire InsPections

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

RESOLUTION NO. 10888

A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF COMPLETED ANNUAL STATE

MANDATED FIRE INSPECTIONS
WHEREAS, CA Health & Safety Code $ 13146.3 requires the Chief of Folsom Fire Department and/or their authorized representatives to inspect every building used as a public or private school within the City of Folsom not less than once each year, for the purpose of enforcing California fire code building standards; and
WHEREAS, CA Health & Safety Code $ 13146.2 requires the City of Folsom Fire Department to annually inspect certain structures, including hotels, motels, lodging houses, and apartment houses, for compliance with fire code building standards; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Senate Bill 1205, Section 13146.4 of the Health & Safety Code requires the City of Folsom Fire Department to report its compliance with Sections 13146'2 and 13146.3 annually to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, City of Folsom Fire Department Prevention Division completed all State mandated fire inspections including hotels, motels, lodging houses, apartment houses, and public or private schools; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom Fire Department annual report of compliance with inspection requirements is submitted to City Council,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council acknowledges receipt of this report from the Fire Chief.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this 12ft day of July 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10888
Page I ofl Page 40
07/12/2022 Item No.7.

Attachment 2
Completed State Mandated Inspections List

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

FOLSOM FIRE

DEPARTMENT
535 Glenn Drive.Folsom, CA 95630
Office (gt6) +6t-6goo Fax (g16) 984-7o8r CITY OF
rtr()rLsc)N4t
Completed State Mandated Inspections List:

RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES :

Business Name: Address
Lake Natoma Inn 7oz Gold Lake Dr.

Hilton Garden Inn 221Iron Point Rd.

CourWardby Marriott z575hon Point Rd.

Staybridge Suites rz4s Cavitt Dr
Larkspur Landing tzr Iron Point Rd.

Hampton Inn and Suites rss Placerville Rd.

Folsom Hotel 7o3 Sutter St.

Fairfield Inn and Suites rzss Cavitt Dr.

Residence Inn 2555 Iron Point Rd.

Folsom Care Center sro Mill St.

Empire Ranch Alzheimer's S Care rSor E Natoma St.

Oakmont of Folsom 1574 Creekside Dr.

Prairie City Landing 6+s Willard Dr.

Brookdale Folsom 7Bo Harrington Wy.

Park Folsom zss Wales Dr
Creekside Oaks r7r5 Creekside Dr.

Falls at Willow Creek rBTo Creekside Dr
Folsom Ranch Apartments looo Folsom Ranch Rd.

Forestwood Apartments g48S Greenback Ln
Regan Trust Apartments 27o Montrose Dr.

Iron Point at Prairie Oaks Apartments tsso Iron Point Rd.

Dabkoski Apartments z6z Montrose Dr.

Montrose Apartments 264 Montrose Dr
Montrose Apartments 268 Montrose Dr.

Montrose Apartments 266 Montrose Dr.

Garrett Apartments 272Montrose Dr.

Overlook at Blue Ravine 12oo Creekside Dr
Preserve at Blue Ravine roo5 Blue Ravine Rd.

Talisman Apartment Building zoo Talisman Dr
Talisman B zoz Talisman Dr.

Talisman Apartment Building zo4 Talisman Dr.

Talisman Apartment Building zo5 Talismian Dr.

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

FOLSOM FIRE

DEPARTMENT
bg5 Glenn Drive.Folsom, CA 95630
Office (gt6) 46t-6goo Fax (916) 984-7o8t CITY OF
rtrOrLs(0N4I
Talisman Apartment Building zo3 Talisman Dr.

Talisman Apartment Building zor Talisman Dr
Talisman Apartment Building zo7 Talisman Dr.

Talisman Apartment Building zo9 Talisman Dr.

Talisman Apartment Building zrr Talisman Dr.

Sherwood Apartments 23oo Iron Point Rd.

Willow Springs Apartments z5o McAdoo Dr.

Legends at Willow Creek r8o S. Lexington Dr.

Canyon Terrace Apartments 16oo Canyon Terrace Ln.

The Park on RileyApartments gg Cable Cir
Waterford Place 24o Natoma Station Dr.

Fairmont Apartments 2oo S. Lexington Dr.
rzrz Bidwell Apartments rzrz Bidwell St.

Bidwell Apartments 7o5 Bidwell St.

Bidwell Apartments zoz Bidwell St.

Bidwell Apartments 7o9 Bidwell St.

Court Yard Apartments 4rz Figueroa St.

Folsom Garden Apartments 7g Stafford St.

Folsom Oaks Apartments Bog Bidwell St.

Garrett Apartments Building 272Montrose Dr.

Gas Light Apartments Sr Dean Way
Marshal Apartments 6rz Stafford St.

Mercy Villaee Apartments 1110 DuchowWay
Mercy Village Apartments rr3o DuchowWay
Mercy Village Apartments 116o DuchowWay
Lake Point Apartments 7550 FolsomAuburn Rd.

Natoma Arms Apartments ror Natoma St
Raintree Apartments looo Sibley St.

Montecito Commons 67oo OakAve.

Hub Apartments szs Willard Dr.

Bidwell Point Apartments rz5 E. Bidwell St.

Talavera Ridge Apartments 1S5o Broadstone Pkvry.

Pique at Iron Point lol Pique Loop.

Granite CiWApartments rrso Sibley Street
Creekview Manor rTzo Creekside Drive
Vintage Willow Creek rTor Creekside Drive

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

FOLSOM FIRE

DEPARTMENT
S3b Glenn Drive.Folsom, CA 95630
Office (g16) +6r-6goo Fax (916) 984-7o8t
]F0)]LS(0N4T
ctlY or

DISTINCTIVE AY NATURE
SCHOOLS:

School Name: Address
HOSPITALS:

Hospital Name:

Mercy Folsom Hospital r6so Creekside Dr.

Vibra 3oo Montrose Dr.

Address:

DETENTION FACILITIES:

Detention Facility Name: Address:

Blanche Sprentz z4g Flower Dr
Carl Sundahl ggs2lnwood Rd.

Empire Oaks r83o Bonhill Dr.

Folsom Hills ro6 Manseau Dr
Gold Ridee 735 Halidon Way
Natoma Station Soo Turn Pike
Oak Chan lol Prewett Dr.

Russell Ranch g7lDry Creek Rd
Sandra J Gallardo zzs Russi Rd.

Theodore Judah 1o1 Dean Way
Folsom Middle Soo Blue Ravine Way
Sutter Middle 7r5 Riley St.

Folsom High 1655 Iron Point Rd.

Vista del Lago rg7oBroadstone Pk *y.

St. John Notre Dame 3o9 Montrose Dr.
46 Natoma St.Folsom Police

07/12/2022 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 7n212022
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10887 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates EastNo. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.

F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10887 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

On May 10,2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10844 - Resolution No. 10844 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs. The Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting (L&L) Districts addresses the annual assessment for each of the City's 30 existing Landscaping and Lighting Districts.

As was the case in Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Natoma Station-Union Square L&L will not be assessed for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 since the Homeowners' Association has elected to cover maintenance costs at this time. In addition, Silverbrook L&L is receiving a credit as was the case last year due to available funds in the fund balance.

POLICY / RULE
Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22586, an annual Engineer's Report shall be filed with the City Clerk. The City Council is also required to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment pursuant to Section 22631of the Streets and Highway Code.

ANALYSIS
The Preliminary Engineer's Report approved by Resolution No. 10844 described the maintenance and servicing to be performed in the City's 30 Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The establishment of annual assessments for each of the L&L Districts requires a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment. The Engineer's Report is in compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; including but not limited to Sections 22565 et seq (preparing a report that complies with the article); and Sections22660 and 22662 (regarding annual installments procedures/process). Budgetary adjustments were made between the Preliminary and Final Engineers Report as a result of increased scheduled landscape maintenance costs stemming from negotiations of a new landscape maintenance contract.

Assessment to Properties
Assessments to properties within each district are the same as FY 202I-22, with the exception of two districts; Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, and Broadstone 4, both of which had CPI's incorporated into the district when they were formed. Willow Creek Estates East No. 2has 3 zones, zones A & B have an increase of $3.98 from $99.53 last year to $103.51 this year. Zone C has an increase of $3 .66 over last year bringing their rate from $91 .49 last year to $95. 1 5 this year. Broadstone 4 has 4 zones, zone A has an increase of $1.17 this year from $38.81 last year to $39.98 this year. ZoneB has an increase of $1.10 over last years rate and increased from 36.96 last year to 38.06 this year. Zone C has an increase of $1.10 over last years rate and increased from $36.42 to $37 .52. Zone D had an increase of $1.06 this year and increased from $35.74 last year to $36.80 this year. There are another ten districts that have escalators and are eligible for CPI increases that will not be utilized this year as they have an ample fund balance and do not need to capture the CPI. Those districts are American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Oaks No. 2, Broadstone 3, Cobble Ridge, Folsom Heights No.2, Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, The Residences, The Residences II, and Sierra Estates.

Installment Summarv
The installment summaries describe short-term installments collected pursuant to Section 22660 of the Streets and Highways Code to meet the districts' future repair and replacement needs anticipated to occur within an approximate five-year time frame, as well as long-term installments collected to meet those future needs anticipated to occur within 5 to 3O-year time frames.

Comparison to Last Year
District budgets for this upcoming year will continue focusing on improvements and restorations that enhance each district's commitment to water conservation, prolonging assets life, drought tolerant landscaping improvements, fire safety, and tree stewardship. As such, some districts will be retrofitting and centralizing inigation controllers, inventorying street trees, changing out plant materials to water wise varietals, and converting over to LED Streetlights. Many of the City's districts are over 20 years old and do not have escalators built into their rates to track with cost- of-living increases and economic changes. As such, districts being monitored for future outreach regarding a new assessment overlay district are Briggs Ranch (31 years old), Hannaford Cross (31 years old), and Cobble Ridge II / Reflections II (28 years old). Lastly the City started the first stages of outreach for an increase in Natoma Station in the 202I-22 Fiscal Year, and will continue in the 2022-2023 Fiscal Years.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
Each Landscaping and Lighting District levies and collects funds to cover operating and maintenance costs. There is no fiscal impact to the City of Folsom General Fund. Below is a sunmary of the proposed assessments for FY 2022-23. There are twenty-eight (28) districts in which the assessments remain the same, two (2) districts with increased assessments, and two (2) districts that are being removed from the tax roll (Union Square because it has an HOA that manages the landscape areas and Silverbrook because there is capacity in the fund balance).

District
Annual
Assessment
per unit
Credit
or increase*
Annual
Net
Assessment
American River Canyon North s102.94 0 $r02.94
$77.70
$269.86
$2r8.60

13.26 8122.28
164.99
$28.07
$39.98
$38.06
American fuver Canyon North
No.2
$77.70 0
American River Canyon North
No.3
$269.86 0
Blue Ravine Oaks $218.60 0
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 $213.26 0
Briess Ranch $122.28 0
Broadstone $164.99 0
Broadstone Unit No. 3 $28.07 0
Broadstone No. 4
o Zone A
o ZoneB
$3 8.81
$36.96
$1.17*
$ 1.10*

07/12/2022 Item No.8.
. Zone C
. ZoneD
$36.42
$3s.74
$ l.l0*
$ 1.06*
$37.s2
$36.80
Cobble Ridee $139.64 0 s139.64
Cobble Hills Ridge
IllReflections II
$113.14 0 $113.14
Folsom Heiehts $70.88 0 $70.88
Folsom Heights No. 2*
o California Hills
o Folsom Heights No. 2
(Enclave)
$196.42
$208.38
0 0
9196.42
s208.38
Hannaford Cross $195.78 0 $19s.78
Lake Natoma Shores $ 183.s 8 0 $183.58
Los Cerros $ 12 r.18 0 $12r.18
Natoma Station
o Natoma Station
o Union Square
$91.71
$228.88
0 (taking off tax roll)
$91.71
$0.00
Natoma Valley $8s6.37 0 $8s6.37
Prairie Oaks Ranch $2t3.61 0 $213.6r
Prosnect Ridee $1,173.86 0 s 1.173.86
The Residences at ARC
r The Residences at ARC
r The Residences at ARC
II
$s36.67
$1,169.97
0 0
ss36.67
$1,169.97
Sierra Estates $363.68 0 $363.68
Silverbrook $138.32 (takins off tax roll) 0.00
Steeplechase $157.68 0 $157.68
Willow Creek Estates East $80.40 0 $80.40
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
o ZoneA
o ZoneB
o ZoneC
$99.53
$99.53
$91.49
s3.98*
$3.98*
$3.66*
$ 103.s r
$103.s 1
$95.1 s
Willow Creek Estates South s109.88 0 $r09.88
Willow Sorines $28. l4 0 s28. l4
PursuanttotheapprovedResolutionNo. 10873-4ResolutionAuthorizingtheCityManagerto Execute an Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds, this Final Engineer's Report is re-allocating funds within 21 districts/CFD's as noted in the table below. The assessments shown above do not change. The funds were derived from fund balances in the district or from other budgeted areas within that district with the capacity to fund the additional maintenance costs as showr below. The following district's scheduled maintenance line items will be adjusted by the amounts shown below. This adjustment is also included within each district's budget as shown in the attached Final Engineer's Report.

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

District Fund Number (s) New Schedlued
Maintenance Budget
Estimated Scheduled
Maintenance Budsets New Allocation Prior Total District Budget
New Total District
Budset
ARC North #2 267 s 105,094.58 s s6,500.00 S 48.s94.s8 s 48,s94.58 Blue Ravine Oaks 278 s 22,080.06 s 17.500.00 s 4,s80.06 S 19,397.00 s 23,977.06 Broadstone #3 266 S 390,ss5.61 s 22s,000.00 s 16s,555.61 S L,244,24o.0o s 1.409.795.61 Broadstone 1,2 270 s 29L.404.LO s 180,000.00 S 111.404.10 s 255.161.00 s 366,s5s.10 Cobble Hills Ridee ll 2t4 s 25,2t8.38 s 20.000.00 s s.218.38 S 54.046.00 S 59.264.38 Natoma Station 207 s L9t,443.36 s 9s,000.00 S 6.443.36 s 24t,174.OO S 247,6L7.36 Willow Creek Estates South 252 s 76.442.54 s 2s,000.00 S sL,442.s4 s 255.790.00 s 318.232.54 Willow Sprinss 262 s 89,488.L7 s 58.0s0.00 s 21.438.t7 S 177.750.00 S 199.188.17 Brisss Ranch 205 s 66,042.95 s 4s.000.00 S 2r.042.9s S Lo2,6L2.oo S 123,654.9s Cobble Ridee 234 s 8.186.67 s 7,s00.00 5 oao.oz S 17,s92.00 s 18.278.67 Folsom Plan Area- (CFD 18) 288 s 304.082.rL s 300,000.00 S 4.082.11 s 901.369.00 s 905.451.11 Hannaford Cross 2L2 s t6,96L.76 s 11.500.00 S s.461.76 S 28.438.00 s 33,899.76 [ake Natoma Shores/Preserve 2t3 s t7,637.84 s 7,000.00 S 10,637.84 S 23,173.00 s 33.810.84 Los Cerros 204 s 27,64r.70 s 26,500.00 S r.r4r.7o s 91.632.00 s 92.773.70 Natoma Vallev/The Knolls 232 s 39,8s5.36 s 39,000.00 S 8s6.36 s 57.500.00 S 58,3s6.36 Prosoect Ridse 285 s 14,669.94 s 8.000.00 S 6.669.94 s 27,769.00 S 34,438.94 Sierra Estates 23r s L532.70 s 4,s00.00 S 4.o32.7o S 17.44s.00 s 21.477.70 Silverbrook 237 s 6,380.44 s 3,1s5,00 S ?.22s.44 s 10.770.00 s 13.995.44 Steeplechase 25L s 14300.28 s 14.000.00 s 300.28 S 46.366.00 s 46.666.28 The Residences at ARC/ ARC 2 27L s 14,905.05 s 14.000.00 S 9os.o6 S 31,866.00 S 32,77r.06 Willow Creek Estates East 284 s 55.830.68 s ss,000.00 S sso.ss s 28.481.00 s 29.311.58 Total: S 474.sso.28 s 3.643.571.00 S 4.LL8.t2t.28

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines $15061(bX3). The Ferguson Group's contract work scope does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10887 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, BroadstoneNo. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs

2. Final Engineer's Report - The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, June 2022
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks & Recreation Director

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. I 0887{'. {"'*

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. 10887

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE

FOLLOWING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.2023 AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH, AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.2, AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO. 3, BLUE RAVINE OAKS, BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO.2, BRTGGS RANCH' BROADSTONE' BROADSTONE NO. 4, BROADSTONE UNIT NO.3, COBBLE RIDGEO COBBLE HILLS RIDGE IIIREFLECTIONS IIo FOLSOM HETGHTS, FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO. 2, HANNAFORD cRosso LAKE NATOMA SHORES, LOS CERROS, NATOMA STATION' NATOMA VALLEY, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2, PROSPECT

RIDGE, SIERRA ESTATES, SILVERBROOK, STEEPLECHASE, THE RESIDENCES

AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYONO THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER

CANYON II, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH, AND WILLOW SPRTNGS
WHEREAS, On May 10, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10844 - Resolution No. 10844 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks RanchNo. 2, Prospect Ridge, Siena Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs; and
WHEREAS, on June 28,2022, City Council approved Resolution No. 10873-4 Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Brightview Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds. This Resolution appropriated funds to twenty-one (21) districts to reflect contract costs for scheduled maintenance received in the new bid process that occurred subsequent to the approval of the Preliminary Engineer's Report on May 10,2022. The assessments will not change as a result of this appropriation. The adjusted amounts are included in this staff report and this Final Engineer's Report; and WHEREAS, July 12,2022 at 6:30 p.m. is the day and time set for hearing objections to the levying of said assessments as identified in Exhibit A attached to this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Final Engineer's Report for the Assessment Districts has been made, filed with the City Clerk and considered by the City Council and is deemed sufficient and approved. The Final Engineer's Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings Resolution No. 10887
Page I of4

07/12/2022 Item No.8.
under and pursuant to this resolution, Section 22500, et. seq,, of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

The City Council finds that the Final Engineer's Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Districts is in full compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and, based on said Report, adopts and approves the following actions:

1. Approve as submitted, the Final Engineer's Report filed with this City Clerk for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

Confirm and approve the diagrams and assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Y ear 2022-2023 .

Continue to order the levy of assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer' s Report for Fiscal Y ear 2022-2023 .

Order the maintenance and servicing of improvements as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

Declare that the assessments set forth in the Final Engineer's Report now constitute liens upon the lots or parcels of land described in said report.

Direct the City Clerk to file a certified copy of said diagrams and assessments with the Auditor of Sacramento County no later than the third Monday in August2022.

Request that the Auditor of Sacramento County enter on the Sacramento County Assessment Roll the assessment for each lot or parcel of land in the amount indicated in the Final Engineer's Report.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12ft day of July 2022by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

Resolution No. 10887

2 -f
4 5
6 7

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10887

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Exhibit A
oF RESOLUTION No. 'sr(t(,t*10887

CITY OF FOLSOM

LANDSCPAING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS
F'ISCAL YEAR 2022.2023
Annual
Assessment
per unit
Annual
District Credit
or increase*
Net
Assessment
American River Canyon North $102.94 0 $r02.94
American River Canyon North
No.2
s77.70 0 $77.70
American River Canyon North
No.3
$269.86 0 $269.86
Blue Ravine Oaks s2r8.60 0 $218.60
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 92t3.26 0 $213.26
Briess Ranch st22.28 0 $122.28
Broadstone $164.99 0 $164.99
Broadstone Unit No. 3 s28.07 0 $28.07
Broadstone No. 4
o Zone A
o ZoneB
o Zone C
c ZoneD
$3 8.81
$36.96
$36.42
$3s.74
$ 1.17*
$ l. l0x
$ 1. l0x
$1.06*
$39.98
$38.06
$37.s2
$36.80
Cobble Ridee s139.64 0 $139.64
Cobble Hills Ridge
IllReflections II
sr r3.14 0 $l 13.14
Folsom Heiehts $70.88 0 $70.88
Folsom Heights No. 2*
o California Hills
o Folsom Heights No. 2
(Enclave)
$196.42
$208.38
0 0
$196.42
$208.38
Hannaford Cross $19s.78 0 $19s.78
Lake Natoma Shores s183.s8 0 $ 183.58
Los Cerros $121. r 8 0 $121.18
Natoma Station
o Natoma Station
r Union Square
$91.71
$228.88
0 (taking off tax roll)
$91.71
$0.00
Natoma Valley $8s6.37 0 $856.37
Prairie Oaks Ranch $213.61 0 s2r3.6t
Prospect Ridge s1.173.86 0 $1,r73.86
The Residences at ARC
o The Residences at ARC
o The Residences at ARC
II
$536.67
$1,169.97
0 0
ss36.6',7
$1,169.97
Sierra Estates $363.68 0 $363.68
Silverbrook $r38.32 (takine off tax roll) 0.00
Steeplechase $1s7.68 0 $1s7.68
Willow Creek Estates East $80.40 0 $80.40
Resolution No. 10887

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
o Zone A
c ZoneB
o ZoneC
$99.s3
$99.53
$91.49
s3.98*
$3.98*
$3.66*
$r03.s1
$r03.sl
$9s. ls
Willow Creek Estates South s109.88 0 $109.88
Willow Sprinss $28.14 0 $28.14
ResolutionNo. 10887

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 2
Final Engineeros Report

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

FY 2422-23 EIUGINEER's RTPoRT
City of Folsom
La ndsca ping a nd Lighting Assessment Districts
July 2022
Fina I Report
Engineer of Work
SClConsultingGroup
Public Financ€ Consulting Services
47 4l: Ma n gels Bculeva rd
Farrf ield, California 94534
707.430.4300
wwr,v,sci-cg.con1

07/12/2022 Item No.8.
(This Page lntentionally Left Blank)

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page i
City of Folsom
City Council
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Member
YK Chalamcherla, Member
Mike Koslowski, Member
City Manager
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
City Attorney
Steve Wang, City Attorney
Folsom Parks & Recreation Director
Lorraine Poggione
Municipal Landscape Services Manager
Tachary Perras
Engineer of Work
SCI Consulting Group
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page ii
Table of Contents
Overview........

Legal Analysis.

Plans & Specification.......

Estimate of Cost and Budget
Description of lmprovements....

Budgets....

Method of Apportionment.......

Discussion of Benefit
General versus Special Benefit
Method of Assessment...............

Assessment Apportionment.......

Assessment .........,......

Assessment Diagram
Appendix A - Budgets.......

Category Descriptions
lmprovement Costs
Current Year lmprovement Projects
Appendix B - Assessment Roll, FY 2022-2?
1 t
3 7
8 8
3 ..........47
50 51
.........,....51
.............. 51
.............. 52
. tL4
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

lntrod uction
Overview
The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") provides funding for the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, sidewalks, fences, walls, parks, open space, signage, soundwalls, street lighting, and other public improvements in the City of Folsom.

Thirty such districts exist as follows:

American River Canyon North
American River Canyon North No. 2
American River Canyon North No. 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No.3
Broadstone No.4
Cobble Ridge
Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No. 2
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Los Cerros
Natoma Station (lncluding Union Square Annexation)
Natoma Valley (Formerly Lakeridge Estates)
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No, 2
Prospect Ridge
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
The Residences at American River Canyon
The Residences at American River Canyon ll
Steeplechase
Willow Creek Estates East
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Willow Creek Estates South
Willow Springs
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

These assessments were established in previous fiscal years. ln each subsequent year for which the assessments will be continued, the City Council ("Council") must direct the preparation of an Engineer's Report, budgets and proposed assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. The Engineer's Report also identifies future planned projects. After the Engineer's Report is completed, the Council may preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report and proposed assessments and establish the date for a public hearing on the continuation of the assessments.

This Engineer's Report ("Report") was prepared pursuant to the direction of the Council.

This Report was prepared to establish the budget for the improvements that would be funded by the proposed 2022-23 assessments and to define the benefits received from the improvements by property within the Districts and the method of assessment apportionment to lots and parcels.

This Report and the proposed assessments have been made pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of L972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") and Article XlllD of the California Constitution (the "Article"). lf the Council approves this Engineer's Report and the proposed assessments by resolution, a notice of the proposed assessment levies must be published in a local paper at least 1"0 days prior to the date of the public hearing. The resolution preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report and establishing the date for a public hearing typically directs that this notice be published.

Following the minimum L0-day time period after publishing the notice, a public hearing is held for the purpose of allowing public testimony about the proposed continuation of the assessments.

This hearing is currently scheduled for July t2,2022. At this hearing, the Council would consider approval of a resolution confirming the assessments for fiscal year 2022-23. lf so confirmed and approved, the assessments would be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
lncluded is a separate but integral tool: the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District lmprovement Plan ("lmprovement Plan"). lt is a separate planning document that identifies the type of upcoming improvement (e.g. re-landscaping a corridor or painting a wall); the estimated cosq any installments required for short-term (less than five years) and/or long term (not greater than 30 years) improvements, and the approximate schedule for completion of the improvement.

The City intends to continually update and revise the lmprovement Plan throughout each year to reflect the current status of improvement projects, budget updates and/or changes in priorities.

The concept of the lmprovement Plan arose from the City's commitment to comply with the requirements of the Act as well as produce a valuable instrument that enables the City to schedule, prioritize, and plan for needed maintenance and servicing improvements in the districts.

It also serves as a user-friendly means for members of the public to review and understand the use of the assessment revenues generated from each district.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Legal Analysis
Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, lnc. v Santa Clara County Open Space Auth ority
ln July of 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, lnc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority ("SVTA vs. SCCOSA"). This ruling is the most significant court case in further legally clarifying the substantive assessment requirements of Proposition 21-8 which was approved by California voters in 1996. Several of the most important elements of the ruling included further emphasis that:
r Benefit assessments are for special, not general, benefit r The services and/or improvements funded by assessments must be clearly defined . Special benefits are directly received by and provide a direct advantage to property in each district
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision and with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution based on the following factors:

1. Most of the Districts were formed prior to the passage of Proposition 21"8 and/or with unanimous approval of property owners. Although these assessments are consistent with Proposition 218, the California judiciary has generally referred to pre-Proposition 2L8 assessments as "grandfathered assessments" and held them to a different standard than post Proposition 218 assessments.

2. The Districts are narrowly drawn to only include the specially benefiting parcels, and the assessment revenue derived from real property in each District is expended only on specifically identified improvements and/or maintenance and servicing of those improvements in that District that confer special benefits to property in that District.

3. The use of unique and narrowly drawn Districts ensures that the improvements constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment, and that such improvements provide direct and special benefit to the property in that District.

4. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the improvements and maintenance thereof financed with assessment revenues in the District provide a direct advantage to properties in that District, and the benefits conferred on such property in each District are more extensive and direct than a general increase in property values.

5. The assessments paid in each District are proportional to the special benefit that.each parcel within that District receives from such improvements and the maintenance thereof because:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2A22-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The specific improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in each District and their respective costs are specified in this Engineer's Report; and b. Such improvement and maintenance costs in each District are allocated among different types of property located within each District, and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics and receive similar special benefits.

Therefore, given the factors highlighted above, this Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision and with the requirements of Article Xlllc & XlllD of the California Constitution.

Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property
On June 8,2009, the 4th District Court of Appeal upheld a benefit assessment for property in the downtown area of the City of Pomona. On July 22,2OO9, the California Supreme Court denied review. ln Dahms the court upheld an assessment that was L00% special benefit (i.e.0% general benefit) on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were directly provided to property in the assessment district. The Court also upheld discounts and exemptions from the assessment for certain properties.

Bonander v, Town of Tiburon
On Decembe r 31.,2009, the 1't District Court of Appeal overturned a benefit assessment approved by property owners to pay for placing overhead utility lines underground in an area of the Town of Tiburon. The Court invalidated the assessments on the grounds that the assessments had been apportioned to assessed property based in part on relative costs within sub-areas of the assessment district instead of proportional special benefits.

Beutz v. County of Riverside
On May 26,2OLO the 4th District Court of Appeals issued a decision on the Steven Beutz v. County of Riverside ("Beutz") appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for park maintenance in Wildomar, California, primarily because the general benefit associated with improvements and services were not explicitly calculated and quantified and separated from the special benefits. a
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego On September22,2O77, the Court of Appeal issued a decision on the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association V. City of San Diego appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for street and landscaping maintenance in the Greater Golden Hill neighborhood of San Diego, California. The court described two primary reasons for its decision. First, like in Beutz, the court found the general benefits associated with services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits. Second, the court found that the City had failed to record the basis for the assessment on its own parcels.

Compliance with Current Law
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution and with the SVIA decision because the lmprovements to be funded are clearly defined; the lmprovements are directly available to and will directly benefit property in the Assessment Districts; and the lmprovements provide a direct advantage to property in each of the Assessment Districts that would not be received in absence of the Assessments.

This Engineer's Report is consistent with Beutz, Dohms and Greater Golden Hil/ because the lmprovements will directly benefit property in each of the Assessment Districts and the general benefits have been explicitly calculated and quantified and excluded from the Assessments. The Engineer's Report is consistent with Bononder because the Assessments have been apportioned based on the overall cost of the lmprovements and proportional special benefit to each property. lmpact of Recent Proposition 218 Decisions
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA, Dahms, Bonander - Beutz and Greater Golden Hill decisions and with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution based on the following factors:
1,. The assessment revenue derived from real property in each assessment District within the City of Folsom is extended only on specific landscaping and other improvements and/or maintenance and servicing of those improvements in that assessment district

2. The use of various assessment districts ensures that the landscaping and other improvements constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment, and that such improvements provide a direct advantage to the property in the assessment district.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

3. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the improvements and maintenance thereof financed with assessment revenues in each assessment district benefits the properties in that assessment district in a manner different in kind from the benefit that other parcels of real property in the City of Folsom derive from such improvements, and the benefits conferred on such property in each assessment district are more extensive and direct than a general increase in property values.

4. The assessments paid in each assessment district are proportional to the special benefit that each parcel within that assessment district receives from such improvements and the maintenance thereof because:

The specific landscaping and other improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in each assessment district and the costs thereof are specified in this Engineer's Report; and
b. Such improvement and maintenance costs in each assessment district are allocated among different types of property located within each assessment district, and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics and receive similar special benefits.

There have been a number of clarifications made to the analysis, findings and supporting text in this Report to ensure that this consistency is well communicated. a
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Plans & Specification
The work and improvements proposed to be undertaken by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") and the cost thereof paid from the continuation of the annual assessment provide special benefit to parcels within the Districts defined in the Method of Assessment herein. Consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, (lhe "Act") the work and improvements (the "lmprovements") are generally described as follows:

Within these districts, the existing and proposed improvements are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, sidewalks, monuments, statuary, fountains, water quality ponds, park facilities, open space, bike trails, walkways, drainage swales and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry signage, street pavers, art work, and monuments and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned or maintained by the City of Folsom. Any plans and specifications for these improvements have been filed with the City of Folsom and are incorporated herein by reference.
"Maintain" or "mointenonce" means the furnishing of services and moteriols for the ordinary and usual mointenance, operotion, ond servicing of any improvement, including:
(o) Repair, removol, or replacement of all or any part of any impravement. (b) Providing for the life, growth, health, ond beouty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or iniury. (c) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. (d) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and ather improvements to remove ar cover groffiti.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of:
(a) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements' (b) Water for the irrigotion of any landscaping, the operatian of ony fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

The assessment proceeds from each District will be exclusively used for lmprovements within that District plus lncidental expenses. Reference is made to the Estimate of Cost and Budget, Appendix A and to the additional plans and specifications, including specific expenditure and improvement plans by District, which are on file with the City.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Estimate of Cost and Budget
Description of fmprovements
Following are descriptions of improvements for the various City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts.

American River Canyon North
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians, corridors, and open spaces . Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, entry fountain, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects
Water fall pump, autofill, filters, chlorination systems.

Waterfall pond liner.
t
American River Canyon North No. 2
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23:
' No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. Paint and replace streetlight poles.

American River Canyon North No. 3
I Purchase of electric power.
. Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. r Maintenance of landscaping, open space, lighting, signs, sidewalk and walls, waterfalls, including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signs.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Centralized irrigation controller upgrade
Signage replacement.

Mystic Hills replace missing landscape.

Future lmprovement Projects:

Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).

ARC Drive/Canyon Falls (Cascade Perimeter) landscape remove/replace trees, mow band replacement.

Main Walking Trail - landscaping, irrigation, stairs and clean up.

Baldwin Dam path repair.

Waterfall rock repair.

Blue Ravine Oaks
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
r No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. Blue ravine wall repair.

Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls and streetlights r Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
I Tree removal/replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page L0
Riley Street Fence Replacement
Tree remova l/replacement.

Signage replacement.

Briggs Ranch
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
. Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, walls, fences, open space area, signage and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Shrub and tree upgrades (Blue Ravine/E. Natoma)
Fence/Wall repa ir/replacem ent.

Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial).

Pet station repair/replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects
' Bollardrepair/replacement.
r Fence repair/replacement (Blue Ravine/E Natoma)
r Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial).
r Entry sign replacement (brass lettering)
r lrrigation upgrades/replacement (3 controllers).
. Landscape lighting upgrades or replacement.
r Tree and Landscape lmprovements (partial collection)
I
I
Broa dston e
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks,trails, sound walls, water quality ponds and streetlights.
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Tree and Landscape lmprovements (partial fund collection).

Bollard repair/replacement.

Light pole/fixture replacement of KW.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Future I mprovement Projects:

Repair irrigation/replace shrubs - lron Point median.

Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).

Shrub replacement throughout (some irrigation repair) 28 acres Landscape light replacement.

Pet station replacement (7).

Signage repair/replacement.

Turf removal/irrigation retrofit.
lrrigation upgrades and flow (15 controllers).

Broadstone Unit No, 3
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street light fixtures
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23:
r No planned projects.

Future I mprovement Projects:
r Paint streetlight poles (350 poles)
Broadstone No.4
Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors.

Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.

Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, sound walls, water quality ponds and streetlights.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lishting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
. Repair irrigation, replant shrubs: Rathbone, Knofler, other interior areas r Landscape light repair/replacement (60 lights).

Future lmprovement Projects
r No planned projects.

I
Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Maintenance of lrrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, soundwalls, signage, parks, park facilities, open space and streetlights.

Purchase of Electric Power from SMUD.

Maintenance of public lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).
r Mini Park and path to Lembi turf and shrub repair/replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects:
r Fence repair/replacement (225 feet)
r Wall repairs and painting.

I Signageimprovement/replacement.
r Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).
. Shrub replacement - Sibley/Corner, Glenn/oxburough
Cobble Ridge
r Maintenance of shrubs and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, open space areas, soundwalls, sidewalks and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
r Fence repair and paiting.
r Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects
r No planned projects,
Folsom Heights
r Maintenance of shrubs and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks and streetlights r Purchase of Electric Power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page L3
r Ladder fuel work.

Future I mprovement Projects
I No planned projects.

Folsom Heights No. 2
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks and streetlights. r Purchase of Electric Power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
r Tree care in open space.
r Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects (if funded with new District) No planned projects
Hannaford Cross
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water and electric power for the two mini parks in a 7O%/30%:

City/District contribution. (based on maintenance assignments) . Maintenance of lrrigation system, bike trails, walkways, fences, walls, guard shack, drainage swale, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Lakeside fence repair.

Repairs at guard shack.

Tree pruning.

Future I mprovement Projects
No planned projects.I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Lake Natoma Shores
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Maintenance of lrrigation system, soundwalls, signage, street pavers, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.
r Purchase of lrrigation water from the City of Folsom' . Purchase of electric Power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23:

LED conversion
Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects
r No planned projects.

Los Cerros
. Maintenance of landscape medians and corridors.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights r Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:

Ladder fuel work.

Tree replacement.

Tree pruning
Paint street light poles.

Future I mprovement Projects:
lnstall flow package and master valve.

Upgrade irrigation controllers
Natoma Station
r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, art work, open space areas, parks, plantings and streetlights.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
. Ladder fuel work
' Light pole replacement
r Shrub & tree replacement & concrete work on turnpike
r lron Point Rd shrub & tree replacement
r Bigfoot mini park tree replacement
r Tree replacement / wall damage on back diamond
I Shrub / tree replacement on Blue Ravine
r Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects:

Tree & Landscape lmprovements ( or replacements)
Wetland area improvements
Wall repair and painting (7800 linear feet)
Mini park replanting / bark ( 2 parks @ .5 acre)
Road paver replacement
Signage repair / replacement
Sidewalk repair
lrrigation upgrades
Art repair
Natoma Station-Union Square
Note: Union Square which is a Benefit zone of Natoma Station will be providing its own landscaping and lighting maintenance via an existing homeowner's association and servicing for 2022-23.

Natoma Valley
. lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, soundwalls, retaining walls, fencing and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r lnteriorlandscapeimprovements.
r Tree pruning.

Future I mprovement Projects:
r No planned projects.

I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Prairie Oaks Ranch
r Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom' r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions'
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
No planned projects
Future lmprovement Projects:

No planned projects
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
r Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. ' Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom' r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover'Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions.
. Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
r Grover entry at lron Point.

Future lmprovement Projects
. Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine
. Landscape Replacement on Riley
. Landscape Replacement on Prairie City
r Landscape replacement on lron Point
r Fence replacement
r Post and cable replacement
. Repair damaged wall
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page L7
Prospect Ridge
r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, open space areas, parks, plantings and streetlights.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
r Maintenance of landscape corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects:

I Plant replacement.

Sierra Estates
Maintenance of landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along Rowland Court, Dolan Court and Riley Street including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, monuments, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry monuments and all necessary appurtenances
Purchase of water from the City of Folsom
Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:

Tree replacement
Future lmprovement Projects:

No planned projects
I
Silverbrook
Note: Silverbrook will not be levied for fiscal year 2022-23, due to a surplus in revenue Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape median, Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.

Maintenance of lrrigation system, entry median, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
r Tree replacement.

Future I mprovement Projects:
r No planned projects.

Steeplechase
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of lrrigation system, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
. Fence replacement near park
r Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects:

No planned projects
The Residences at American River Canyon
r Maintenance landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along American River Canyon Drive and Oak Avenue including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, sound-walls, and all necessary appurtenances. . Purchase of water from San Juan Water District.
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Landscape replacement.

Futu re lmprovement Projects
No planned projects.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The Residences at American River Canyon ll
r lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs, and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signage and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment Planned lmprovement Projects tor 2022-23:
r Landscapereplacement.

Future lmprovement Projects:
r No planned projects.

Willow Creek Estates East
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects: (if funding available)
r No planned projects.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.

Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
2 flow packages & Master Valve lnstall
Light pole replacement (3)
Tree pruning
Oleander replacement on Blue Ravine frontage.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Future lmprovement Projects
. Landscape replacement on Oak Avenue.
. Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine.
r lrrigation controller upgrade (4 controllers).
r Tree and landscape improvement / replacement
Willow Creek Estates South
Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, entry signage, drainage way, parks, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
r Tree pruning.
r New planting around replaced signs
. lnterior sign replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects
No planned projects
Willow Springs
. Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23:
r LED retrofits..

Future I mprovement Projects:
r Paint/repair Lamp Posts.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Budgets
Below is a summary of the Budgets for the various districts. Refer to Appendix A - Budgets, for detailed budgets for each district.
lmprovement
Gosts
lncidental
Costs
Total
lmprovernent CostsDistrict
River Canyon North
River Canyon North 2
River Canyon North 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No.3
Broadstone No.4
Cobble Hills ll/Reflections ll
Cobble Ridge
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No, 2
Hannaford Gross
Lake Natoma Shores
Natoma Valley (formerly) Lakerid ge
Los Cenos
Natoma Station
Prospect Ridge
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No.2
The Residences at ARC
e Residences at ARC I I
Estates
llow Creek East
llowGreek East Estates No 2
illow Creek South
illow Springs
TOTALS
$146,500.00
$56,000.00
$373,600.00
$17,700.00
$53,380,06
$105,542.95
$303,904.00
$24,500 00
$347,500.00
$46,568.38
$14,586.67
$42,150.00
$63,275,00
$26,361 76
$36,087.84
$47,481.36
$85,541.70
$206,943.36
$26,944.94
$80,000.00
$275,000.00
$25,855.06
$25,855.06
$17,807.70
$12,738.61
$39,500.28
$26,000.00
$125,830.68
$208,330.68
$14,000.00
$6,309.54
$1,475.40
$542.54
$2,343,35
$5,917.35
$16,831.41
$66,632,70
$2,885.00
$15,210.38
$12,078.51
$2,259.82
$1,754.72
$6,952.00
$5,329.77
$4,619.67
$9,919.61
$6,943.83
$40,371.37
$6,208.65
$67,593.99
$5,950.00
$5,312.03
$0.00
$2,127.75
$2,508 17
$6,493.00
$3,190.00
$15,950.00
$12,517.57
$1,530.03
$152,809,54
$57,475.40
$374,142.54
$20,043.35
$59,297.41
$122,374.36
$370,536.70
$27,385.00
$362,710.38
$58,646.89
$16,846.49
$43,904.72
$70,227.00
$31,691.53
$40,707.51
$57,400.97
$92,485.53
$247,314.73
$33, I 53.59
$147,593.99
$280,950.00
$31,167.09
$25,855.06
$19,935.45
$15,246.77
$45,993.28
$29,190.00
$141 ,780.68
9220,848.25
$15,530.03
$2,875,486.09 $337,758,1 5 $3,213,244.24
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Gurent
Projects
Benefit Units
(SFEs)
Rate Total Assessment
District
rorAts
$65,000.00
$25,000.00
$250,000.00
$0.00
$15,000.00
$0,00
$0.00
$10,000.00
$75,000.00
$0.00
$500.00
$28,000.00
$37,000.00
$0.00
$8,000.00
$0.00
$35,500.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$6,000.00
$0.00
$10,000.00
$0.00
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
$0.00
$77.70
$269.86 .
$218.60
$213.26 .
$122.28
$164.99
$28.07 .
$39.98 -
$113,14
$139.64.
$70.88
$208.38 .
$195.78
$183 58
$856.37 .
$121.18
$91.70
$ 1 ,1 73.86
$213.61
$313.91 .
$536.67 .
$1 ,169.97 .
$363.68 .
$0.00
$157 68
$80.40
$103.51 .
$109.88
$28.14
$105,204.68
$12,432.00
$275,796.92
$36,069.00
$35,187.90
$80,706.02
$390,859.66
$22]79,65
$82,560.53
$44,011.46
$1 3,684 72
$21,831 04
$62,386.89
$20,165.34
$20,744.54
$67,653.23
$40,837.66
$173,976.36
$31,400,76
$196,228.55
$288,367.14
$9,123.39
$11,699.70
$9,092.00
$0.00
$24,282.72
$60,058.80
$76,748.01
$160,642.36
$14,548.38
River Canyon Nodh
River Canyon North 2
River Ganyon North 3
1,022
160
1,022
165
'165
660
2,369
812
2,065
389
98 308
299
103
113
70 337
1,897
27 919
919
17 10
25 114
154
747
741
1462
517
$102.94
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No.2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No.3
Broadstone No,4
Gobble Hills ll/Reflections ll
Cobble Ridge
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No. 2
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Natoma Valley (fo rmerly) Lakerid ge
Los Cenos
Natoma Station
Prospect Ridge
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
The Residences at ARC
The Residences at ARC I I
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
Steeplechase
Willow Creek East
Willow Creek East Estates No 2
Willow Creek South
Willow Springs
$639,000.00 $2,389,079.41
* Subject to CPI increase
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Method of Apportionment
This section of the Engineer's Report includes an explanation of the benefits to be derived from the installation, maintenance and servicing of the lmprovements throughout the Districts, and the methodology used to apportion the total assessment to properties within the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts,
The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts consist of all Assessor Parcels within the boundaries of each District defined as defined by Assessment Diagram included within this report and the Assessor Parcel Numbers listed within the included Levy roll. The parcels include all privately or publicly owned parcels within said boundaries. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large. The apportionment of special benefit is a two-step process: the first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements, and the second step is to allocate the assessments to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property.

Discussion of Benefit
ln summary, the assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting AcI of 1972 states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within on ossessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net omount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by eoch such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Proposition 21.8, as codified in Article XlllD of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and the assessment must not exceed the reasonable cost ofthe proportional benefit upon the assessed parcel:
"No ossessrnent shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel." The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential, commercial, industrial and other lots and parcels resulting from the lmprovements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These categories of special benefit are supported by various California legislation and supporting studies which describe the types of special benefit received by property from lmprovements such as those proposed by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Proximity to improved landscaped areas within each District.

Access to improved landscaped areas within each District. lmproved Views within each District.

Extension of a property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the lmprovements.

Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the District and the services provided bythe District, would not have been created. ln this regard, the recent the SVTA v. SCCOSA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties in three distinct areas:

Proximity
Expanded or improved access
Views
The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel, and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SVTA v.

SCCOSA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park improved by an assessment:

The characterization of a benefit may depend on whether the porcel receives o direct advantage from the improvement (e.9, proximity to a park) or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.9. generol enhancement of the district's property values).

Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed above further strengthen the basis of these assessments.

Benefit Factors
The special benefits from the lmprovements are further detailed below:

Proximity to improved landscaped areas within the District Only the specific properties within close proximity to the lmprovements are included in each District. Therefore, property in the Districts enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the lmprovements that the public at large and property outside the Districts do not share.

I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

ln absence of the assessments, the lmprovements would not be provided and the landscaping areas in the Districts would be degraded due to insufficient funding for maintenance, upkeep and repair. Therefore, the assessments provide lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity and access enjoyed by parcels in the Districts, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the Districts.

Access to improved landscaped areas within the District Since the parcels in each District are the only parcels that enjoy close access to the lmprovements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas that are provided by the Assessments. This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in that District.
lmproved views within the District
The District, by maintaining these landscaped areas, provides improved views to properties in each District. The properties in a District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the lmprovements; therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the Assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon property in a District.

Extension of a property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the lmprovements
ln large part because it is generally cost prohibitive to provide large open land areas in development projects, the residential, commercial and other benefiting properties in each District do not have large outdoor areas and green spaces. The landscaped areas within each District provide additional outdoor areas that serve as an effective extension of the land area for properties that are in close proximity to the lmprovements. The lmprovements, therefore, provide an important, valuable and desirable extension of usable land area, which confers a direct advantage and special benefit to properties in close proximity to the lmprovements.

Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the assessments, would not have been created
Typically, the original owner/developer of the property within the Districts can petition the City to establish the assessment districts. As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through Department of Real Estate "White Paper" reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. Purchase of property was also an "agreement" to pay the assessment. ln absence of the assessments, the lots within the Districts would probably not have been subdivided and created. These lots, and the improvements they support, are a special benefit to the property owners.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

General versus Special Benefit
The assessments from the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts are used to fund improvements and increased levels of maintenance to the grounds adjoining the properties in the Districts. ln absence of those Districts, such lmprovements would not be provided and the properties would not have been subdivided and improved to the same extent. The Districts were specifically proposed for formation to provide additional and improved improvements, and services in the Districts. ln absence of the assessments, these public resources could not be created and revenues would not be available for their continued maintenance and improvement.

Therefore, the assessments solely provide special benefit to property in the Districts over and above the general benefits conferred by the general facilities of the City.

Although these lmprovements may be available to the general public at large because the Districts are accessible by members of the public, the lmprovements within each District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for property inside the Districts, and not the public at large.. Other properties that are either outside the Districts or within the Districts and not assessed, do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. These lmprovements are of special benefit to properties located within the Districts because they provide a direct advantage to properties in the Districts that would not be provided in absence of the assessments.

Although the analysis used to support these assessments concludes that the benefits are solely special, as described above, consideration is made for the suggestion that a portion of the benefits are general. General benefits cannot be funded by these assessments - the funding must come from other sources.

The maintenance and servicing of these improvements is also partially funded, directly and indirectly from other sources including City of Folsom, the County of Sacramento and the State of California. This funding comes in the form of grants, development fees, special programs, and general funds, as well as direct maintenance and servicing of facilities (e.g. curbs, gutters, streets, drainage systems, and other infrastructure maintenance items such as pond clean outs and street sweeping, etc.) This funding from other sources more than compensates for general benefits, if any, received by the properties within the districts.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

ln the 2009 Dahms case, the court upheld an assessment that was 100% special benefit on the rationale that the services funded by the assessments were directly provided within the assessment district over and above the services already provided by the City within the boundaries of the assessment district. lt is also important to note that certain services funded by the assessments in Pomona are similar to the services funded by the Assessments described in this Engineer's Report and the Court found these services to be 100% special benefit. Similar to the assessments in Pomona, the Assessments described in this Engineer's Report fund improvements and services directly provided within the Assessment District to benefit properties within the assessment district and not to the public at large, and these properties enjoy close proximity and access to the lmprovements. Therefore, Dahms establishes a basis for minimal or zero general benefits from the Assessments.

Step 1: Calculation of the General Benefit
The general benefits from this assessment may be quantified as illustrated in the following table.

Benefit Factor
Relative
Weieht
General Benefit
Contribution
Relative
General
Benefit
Creation of parcels
lmproved views
lmproved nighttime visibility and safety from streetlights 90 5
5 o%
ro%
20%
0 0.5
1 100
Total Calculated General Benefit =

1.5 L5%
As a result, the City of Folsom will contribute at least L.5% of the total budget from sources other than the assessment. The contribution offsets any general benefits from the Assessment Services.

Step 2: Calculation of Current General Benefit Contribution from City The general benefit contribution is satisfied from the sum of the following components:

The City of Folsom owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Assessment Districts improvements. This curb and gutter serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the City of Folsom toward general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb gutter is conservatively estimated to be 1%.

The City of Folsom owns and maintains storm drainage systems along the border of the Assessment Districts improvements. This system serves to prevent flooding and associated damage to the improvements, and manage urban runoff including local pollutants loading from the improvements. The contribution from the City of Folsom towards general benefit from the maintenance, and operation of the local storm drainage systems are conservatively estimated to be 1%.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The City of Folsom owns and maintains local public streets along the border of the Assessment District improvements. These public streets proved access to the improvements for its enjoyment as well as efficient maintenance. The contribution from the City of Folsom towards general benefit from the maintenance of local public streets is conservatively estimated to contribute 7%.

The lmprovements were constructed by the original owner/developer(s) as a condition of development. The value of the construction of the improvements can be quantified and monetized as an annuity. Since this construction was performed and paid by non-assessment funds, this "annuity" can be used to offset general benefit costs, and is conservatively estimated to contribute 25%.

Therefore, the total General Benefit that is conservatively quantified at1..5% is more than offset by the total non-assessment contribution towards general benefit of 28%.

Method of Assessment
The second step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE).

This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated a SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE.

Assessment Apportionment
The improved properties within the Districts consist of primarily of single family, multi-family, commercial and non-assessed parcels, with the vast majority being single family. Since all single family residential parcels in the Districts are deemed to have good proximity to the improvements, such single family properties receive similar benefit from the proposed improvements and are assigned 1.0 SFE units. The benefits for other types of properties are further defined as follows.

General Case
Many of the City of Folsom Districts contain only single family residences and non-assessed properties such as parks and green spaces. These districts are:

Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Cobble Ridge
155 residential lots
165 residential lots
98 residential lots
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Los Cerros
Natoma Station - {Union Square Annexation)
Natoma Valley
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
Steeplechase
The Residences at American River Canyon
The Residences at ARC ll Annexation
Willow Creek East
Willow Springs
Total
389 residential lots
103 residential lots
11"3 residential lots
337 residential lots
116 residential lots
72 residential lots
25 residential lots
122 residential lots
l-54 residential lots
17 residential lots
10 residential lots
747 residential lots
517 residential lots
3,150
These Districts are assessed per Assessment Table 1
Assessment Table 1
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.00
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.00
Note: ln 2006-07, a general case SFE rate was established for condominiums in districts in which the original Engineer's Report did not anticipate condominium development. This rate is 0.67 SFEs.

American River Canyon North
There are 41,0.124 acres in American River Canyon North. There are 1006 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) The 2.00 acres of currently undeveloped property is assigned 2.63 SFEs per acre from a rate determined at the time of formation of this district:

American River Canyon North properties are assessed per Assessment Table 2, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Table 2
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.00
Undeveloped Property, per acre 2.63
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.00
American River Canyon North No. 2
There are 130.305 acres in American River Canyon North No. 2. American River Canyon No. 2 lies completely within American River Canyon North. There are L6l. residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE).

American River Canyon North No. 2 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 3, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 3
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Residential Property, per lot o.3273
Non Assessed (e.9. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
American River Canyon North No 3
There are 4t}.t24 acres in American River Canyon North. There are L006 residential lots Each assessable parcel in the Assessment District receives a special and direct benefit from the improvements in the Assessment District. Since the Assessment District is comprised of residential single family improved properties and all properties have good proximity to the improvements, all assessable parcels within the Assessment District are estimated to benefit equally from the improvements associated with the Assessment District, and the costs associated with the improvements are apportioned equally to all parcels on the basis of current or proposed dwelling units. Each parcel is assigned SFE units relative to the number of current or proposed dwelling units on the parcel.

The procedure used to arrive at each parcel's annual levy amount is Balance to Levy / Total SFE Benefit Units in District = Assessment Amount Per Benefit Unit City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

There are three Zones of Benefit. ln Zone A each parcel is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE), in Zone B, each parcel is assigned 0.83 benefit unit (SFE) and Zone C each parcel is assigned 0.50 benefit unit (SFE.) Properties in Zone B and Zone C receive lower benefit units because they currently pay for common open space areas within their zone. ln2OO7, when the American River Canyon North District No. 3 was formed, an analysis of the associated landscaping improvements was performed to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. lt was estimated that Zone B receives t7% of the special benefit, and Zone C receives 5O% of the special benefit.

Therefore, the SFE units for Zone B and Zone C have been adjusted accordingly.

American River Canyon North properties are assessed per Assessment Table 4, below Assessment Table 4
Description SFEs
Zone A - Original ARCN Area 1.0000
Zone B - Canyon Falls Village Area 0.8300
Zone C-ARCN No.2 Area 0.5000
Broa dstone
According to the Broadstone Landscaping and Lighting "Method of Spread," there are 895.301 assessable acres in Broadstone. Of these, 416.7455 acres are divided into 1,582 single family residential lots (4.2 lots per acre average) and 479.156 acres are divided into multi-family and commercial lots. The multi-family parcels are APN O72[O7OOO2 through APN 0721070100 are known as Bentley Square West (99 units); and APN OT2L6IOOOI through APN 072151053 are known as Bentley Square East (53 units). [ln addition to these properties listed in the "Method of Spread," other multi-family complexes are also assessed, including Vessona, Sherwood, Haildon.] Although these projects were designed as single family small lot divisions, the density is consistent with the multi-family land use designation. These projects are consistent with both the Multi- Family Low Density General Plan Land Use Designation (MLD) and the Multi-Family zoning (R- M_PD) of the project site. There are 1530 single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1 SFEs. There are 312.555 developed, non-single family acres and each is assigned 2.1 SFEs per acre [This is the rate applied to commercial properties, as implicitly indicated in the Method of Spreadl. (4.2 units * 0.5). Unrecorded single family residential lots are assigned .65 SFEs.

There are 134.387undeveloped, non-single family residential acres and each one with be assigned

0.704 SFEs per acre. (4.2 units *.0.5 * 0.335). There are 1"52 lots with Bentley Square East and West and each is assigned .0962 SFEs per lot.

Broadstone properties are assessed per Assessment Table 5, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Table 5
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel L.0000
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit 0.0962
Developed Non-Single Family, per acre 2.1000
Undeveloped Non-Single Family, per acre 0.7040
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Broadstone No.3
There are 559.36 acres in Broadstone No.3. Of these,325 acres are single family residential lots (2.034lots per acre average)and 11.48 acres are divided into multi-family residential and 26.93 acres are non-assessed for use as parks, open space, etc. There are 382 single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1 SFE. There are 28.09 developed, non-single family residential acres and each one is assigned 2.034 SFEs per acre. There are 283 undeveloped, single family lots and each one is assigned 0.326 SFEs. There are t7t.7L undeveloped, non-single family residential acres and each one is assigned 0.325 x 2.034 SFEs.

Broadstone No.3 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 5, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 5
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Single Family Parcel 0.3260
Developed Non-Single Family, per acre 2.0340
Undeveloped Non-Single Family, per acre 0.6630
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Broadstone No.4
Residential
Certain residential properties in the Assessment District that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned one Single Family Equivalent or 1.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. lf there is more than one single family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged one SFE per single family detached dwelling.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Properties with more than one residential unit (otherthan parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties.

These properties benefit from the lmprovements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit. The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing the Assessment District, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2S1 persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.L2 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.9L people on average for a single family residence and 2.72 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types.

Commercial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property. The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties.
ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (the "SANDAG Study") are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24.
ln comparison, the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.91.

Since the average lot size for a single family home in the Assessment District is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The employee density per acre is generally 1,.65 times the population density of single family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 14.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. Table 2 below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category.

Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres.
lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate.

Vacant
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proport[onal to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed. ln 201"5, when the Broadstone No. 4 was formed, an analysis was performed of the associated lighting and landscaping improvements to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. As a result, four Zones of Benefit were created within Broadstone No. 4. Parcels in Zone B are determined to receive 95.25% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 93.87% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, and parcels in Zone D are determined to receive 92.23% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A.

Broadstone No. 4 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 7, below:

Assessment Table 7
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.00
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit (2 to 4 units) 0.27
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit (5+ units) 0.22
Condo 0.40
Mobile Home (separate lot) o.20
Commercial, shopping center 0.50
Office L.42
Vacant 0.25
Briggs Ranch
There are 642 residential lots and each one is assigned l- benefit unit (SFE). Undeveloped residential parcels APN: 071-L1-90-007, 008, 010, 01L and 012 are assessed based on 2.2 SFEs per acre.

Briggs Ranch properties are assessed per Assessment Table 8, on the next page, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Table 8
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Single Family, per acre 2.2000
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Folsom Heights
There are 288 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) APN 071-1050-050 is assessed 4,1 SFEs per acre.

Folsom Heights properties are assessed per Assessment Table 9, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 9
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Single Family, per acre 4.1000
Multi Family, per unit 0.5000
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Natoma Station
There are 1.272single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1SFEs. There are 94,99 acres of Commercial and each one is assigned .6299 SFEs per acre. There are 21.03 acres of Multi Family and each one is assign ed 3.2337 SFEs per acre.

Natoma Station properties are assessed per Assessment Table L0, on the next page, as per the original formation documents;
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Table 10
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Commercial outside of Lot X, per acre 0.6299
Commercial inside of Lot X, per acre 4.2487
Multi Family, per acre 3.2337
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Prospect Ridge
The assessments provide comprehensive lmprovements that will clearly confer special benefits to properties in the Assessment District. The allocation of special benefits to property is partially based on the type of property and the size of property. These benefits can also partially be measured by the occupants on property in the Assessment District because such parcel population density is a measure of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the lmprovements.

It should be noted that many other types of "traditional" assessments also use parcel population densities to apportion the assessments. For example, the assessments for sewer systems, roads and water systems are typically allocated based on the population density of the parcels assessed.

Therefore, the apportionment of benefit is reasonably based the type of parcel, the size of parcels ad the population density of parcels.

The primary step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE).

This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated a SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE.
ln the process of determining the appropriate method of assessment, the Engineer considered various alternatives. For example, an assessment only for all residential improved property was considered but was determined to be inappropriate because commercial, industrial and other properties also receive direct benefits from the lmprovements.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Moreover, a fixed or flat assessment for all properties of similar type was deemed to be inappropriate because larger properties receive a higher degree of benefit than other similarly used properties that are significantly smaller, (For two properties used for commercial purposes, there is clearly a higher benefit provided to the larger property in comparison to a smaller commercial property because the larger property generally supports a larger building and has higher numbers of employees, customers and guests that would benefit from proximity and improved access to well maintained and improved landscaped areas. So the potential population of employees or residents is a measure of the special benefits received by the property.) Larger parcels, therefore, receive an increased benefit from the assessments.

Finally, the special benefits to be derived from the proposed assessments will be conferred on property and are not based on a specific property owner's use of the improvements, or a specific property owner's occupancy of property or the property owner's demographic status such as age or number of dependents, However, it is ultimately people who value the special benefits described above and use and enjoy the Assessment District's landscaped areas. ln other words, the benefits derived to property are related to the average number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or otherwise could use a property, not how the property is currently used by the present owner. Therefore, the number of people who could or potentially live on, work at or otherwise use a property is one indicator of the relative level of benefit received by a property.
ln conclusion, the Assessment Engineer determined that the appropriate method of assessment apportionment should be based on the type and use of property, the relative size of the property, its relative population and usage potential and its proximity to landscaped areas. This method is further described below.

Residential
Assessment Table 11
Tvpe of Residential Property
Pop. Density
Equivalent
SqFt
Factor
Proposed
Rate
Single Family Residential
Condominium
Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex
Multi-Family Residential (5+ Units)
Mobile Home on Separate Lot

1.00 4.73

0.64 0.64
o.45

1.00 0.55
o.42

0.34 0.45

1.00 0.40
o.27
o.22
o.20
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Commercial/l ndustrial Properties
Assessment Table 12
Vacant Properties
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type -developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.
0ther Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property, City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
Type of Com m erci al /ln d udri al
Land U*
Average
Employees
Per Acre 1
SFE Units
per
Quafter Acre 2
SFE Units
per
Acre After 5
Commercial
Ofice
Shopping Center
Offce
Self Storage or Parking Lot

0.500

1.420
0"500

0.500

0.o21
24 68
24 24
1 0.500

1.420

0.500

0.500

0.033

0.004

0.002
Golf Course
Cemeteries 0.10

0.05 SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Prairie Oaks Ranch
There are 855 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE). There is one multi- family parcel and it is being assessed 57 SFEs. There is one proposed school site and it is being assessed 5.62 SFEs, or the cost of maintaining its' frontage.

Prairie Oaks Ranch properties are assessed per Assessment Table 13, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 13
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Proposed School Site, per parcel 5.6300
Multi Family, per unit 1.0000
Non Assessed (e.g, open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
The proposed assessments will provide additional maintenance and servicing of existing improvements that will clearly confer special benefits to properties in the Assessment District.

The allocation of special benefits to property is partially based on the type of property and the size of property. These benefits can also partially be measured by the occupants on property in the Assessment District because such parcel population density is a measure of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the improvements. lt should be noted that many other types of "traditional" assessments also use parcel population densities to apportion the assessments. For example, the assessments for sewer systems, roads and water systems are typically allocated based on the population density of the parcels assessed. Therefore, the apportionment of benefit is reasonably based the type of parcel, the size of parcels and the population density of parcels.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The primary step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single-family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE).

This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated an SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single-family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single-family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE that currently total to 899.4.

Moreover, a fixed or flat assessment for all commercial properties of similar type was deemed to be inappropriate because larger commercial properties receive a higher degree of benefit than other similarly used properties that are significantly smaller. (For two properties used for commercial purposes, there is clearly a higher benefit provided to the larger property in comparison to a smaller commercial property because the larger property generally supports a larger building and has higher numbers of employees, customers and guests that would benefit from proximity and improved access to well maintained and improved landscaped areas. So the potential population of employees or residents is a measure of the special benefits received by the property.) Larger parcels, therefore, receive an increased benefit from the assessments.

Finally, the special benefits to be derived from the proposed assessments will be conferred on property and are not based on a specific property owner's use of the improvements, or a specific property owner's occupancy of property or the property owner's demographic status such as age or number of dependents. However, it is ultimately people who value the special benefits described above and use and enjoy the Assessment District's landscaped areas. ln other words, the benefits derived to property are related to the average number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or otherwise could use a property, not how the property is currently used by the present owner. Therefore, the number of people who could or potentially live on, work at or otherwise use a property is one indicator of the relative level of benefit received by a property.
ln conclusion, the Assessment Engineer determined that the appropriate method of assessment apportionment should be based on the type and use of property, the relative size of the property, its relative population and usage potential and its proximity to landscaped areas. This method is further described on the next page.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Residential Properties
Assessment Table 14
Commercial/l ndustrial Properties
Assessment Table 15
Type ol Com m erct al/hclu*l at
Lend L&
Avera'ge
Emplolle,€6
furActg I
SFE Untts
pQr
Quarfrr Aere 2
SFE {.lrrits
per
Acra Altbr 5
Comm6rcial
Ofrice
Shopping Center
Ofice
Sslf Storao€ or Parklno Lot
24 68
24 24
1 0.500

1.420

0.500

0.500

0.021

0.500

1.420

0.500

0.500
Golf Course
C€m€l6rles
Agrlcultur€

0.80 0.10

0.05 0.033

0.004

0.002
Vacant Properties
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to improvements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
Pop. Denslty
Equlvalent
SqR SFE
Factor1}me of Resldentlal Properly Faclor
Single Family Residential
Condominium
Duplax Triplex, Fourplex
Multi-Family Residenlial (5+ Units)
Mobile Home on Separab Lot

1.00 0.73

0.77 0.72

0.58 1.00

0.58 0.42

0.30 0.43

1.00 042

0.32 022
025
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Zones of Benefit
As part of the engineering work for this assessment, an analysis was conducted on the relationship (including proximity, level of service, etc.), between properties and the primary improvements located throughout the Assessment District. Parcels in Zone A (on Garrett Drive, Ferrera Drive and Whitmer Drive) receive direct special benefit from the proximate landscaping and trees adjacent to the properties as well as less proximate streetlighting. Parcels in Zone B receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting as well as landscaping particularly along the street entrances into the neighborhood. Zone C receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting but lees benefit from the landscaping because they are less proximate to the landscaped areas.

Thus, three zones (A, B, and C) were created as shown on the assessment diagram. Parcels in Zone A are determined to receive same level of the level of special benefit of those within Zone B and parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 92.08% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A and Zone B.

The SVIA decision indicates
ln a well-drawn district - limited to only porcels receiving special benefits from the improvement - every parcel within that district receives o shared special benefit. Under section 2, subdivision (i), these benefits can be construed as being general benefits since they are not "particular and distinct" ond ore not "over and sbove" the benefits received by other properties "located in the district."
We do not believe thot the voters intended to invalidote on qssessment district that is norrowly drawn to include only properties directly benefiting from an improvement. lndeed, the ballot materials reflect atherwise. Thus, if dn assessment district is narrowly drawn, the fact that a benefit is conferred throughout the district does not make it general rather thon special. tn that circumstance, the characterizotion of a benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives a direct advantoge from the improvement (e.9., proximity to park) or receives on indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.g., general enhancement of the district's property values). ln the Assessment District, the advantage that each parcel receives from the lmprovements is direct, and the boundaries are narrowly drawn to include only parcels that benefit from the assessment. Therefore, the even spread of assessment throughout each narrowly drawn Zone of Benefit is indeed consistent with the SVIA decision and satisfies the "direct relationship to the "locality of the improvement" standard.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Residential Properties
Assessment Table 15
Commercial/l ndustrial Properties
Assessment Table 17
Vacant Properties
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
Tvne of Recklential Prooertv
Pop. Densfty
Eouivalent
SqFt
Factor
Proposed
Rate
Single Fanily Residential
Condominium
Dupbx Triplex Fourpbx
Mulli-Fanily Residential (5+ Units)
Mobih Home on Separaie Lot

1.00 0.73

0.64 0.64

0.45 1.00

0.55 0.42
034

0.45 1.00

0.40 0.27

0.22 0.20
TWe o, @ m merci atlhtd u&rial
Ldrd U&
Avqage
Employee6
fur Acre I
SFE UDitS
pQr
Quartq Acre '
SF€ Units
per
Acre After 5
Commcrcial
Offce
Shopftnq Cerler
Oflicc
Sclt Storide or Pdrkino Lot
24 58
24 24
1 0.500

1.420

0.s00

0.500

0.021

0.500

1.420

0.500

0.500
gricdturc
Course
enes 0.10

0.0s

0.00.1 0.002
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property' Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Willow Creek Estates South
There are 1102 residential lots in Village 1, 2, 3 (lots 41-93 and 155-165), 4-7 and 9A and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) There are 243 residential lots in Village 8 and 9b and each one is assigned 1.086 benefit unit (SFE). There are 64 residential lots in Village 3 (lots 41-93 and 155- 155), and each one is assigned 1.256 benefit unit (SFE). There are 10 Lexington Business Park parcels and they are assessed at 0.618 SFEs per parcel. There are 3 Lexington Square parcels and they are assessed at2.47!0 SFEs per parcel.

Willow Creek Estates South properties are assessed per Assessment Table L8, on the next page, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Table 18
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel Village L,2,3 (lots 41-93 and 155-165),4-7 and 9A 1.0000 Single Family Parcel Village 8 and 9b 1.0870
Single Family Parcel Village 3 (lots 4L-93 and 155-155) 1.2550 Business Park Parcel 0.6180
Commercial Parcel 2.4710
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Other Property Types
Public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific lmprovement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom, County of Sacramento, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XlllD of the California Constitution (collectively "the Act"), initiated the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts;
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom directed the undersigned Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report presenting an estimate of costs, a diagram for the Districts and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements upon all assessable parcels within the Districts, to which the description of said proposed improvements therein contained; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City of Folsom, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of said improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the Districts.

The amount to be paid for said improvements and the expense incidental thereto, to be paid by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for the fiscal year 2022-23 is generally as follows:

SummarV Cost Estimates
lmprovement Costs
lncidental Costs
Other Costs
Sz,ss,qsa.w
5337,758.15
563g,ooo.oo
Total lmprove ment Costs 53,8s2,244.24
As required by the Act, an Assessment Diagram is hereto attached and made a part hereof showing the exterior boundaries of said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts. The distinctive number of each parcel or lot of land in the said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts is its Assessor Parcel Number appearing on the Assessment Roll.

And I do hereby assess and apportion said net amount of the cost and expenses of said improvements, including the costs and expenses incident thereto, upon the parcels and lots of land within said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot, from the improvements, and more particularly set forth in the Cost Estimate and Method of Assessment hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The assessments are made upon the parcels or lots of land within the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts in proportion to the special benefits to be received by the parcels or lots of land, from said improvements.

The Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American Canyon ll Annexation to the Residences at American River Canyon, Cobble Ridge, Broadstone 3, and Natoma Valley, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Prospect Ridge are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Area, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 4% and American River Canyon North 3, Blue Ravine No. 2, Folsom Heights No. 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No.2 are subject a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 3%.

Any change in the CPI in excess of the maximum annual increase shall be cumulatively reserved as the "Unused CPl" and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than 4% for Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American Canyon ll Annexation to the Residences at American River Canyon, Cobble Ridge, Broadstone 3, and Natoma Valley, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Prospect Ridge; and is less than 3% for American River Canyon North 3, Blue Ravine No. 2, Folsom Heights No. 2 and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2.

The proposed assessments for the Districts that are eligible for the CPI increase will be assessed at the rate used in fiscal year 202L-2022 but are less than the maximum authorized rates.

Broadstone No.4 and Willow Creek East Estates No. 2 will be assessed at the maximum authorized rate for fiscal year 2022-23.

District
Authorized
Rate
Proposed
Rate22-23
American River Canyon North No. 3 s294.90 s269.86
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 s232.eo s2r3.26
Broadstone 3 sse.sg 528.07
Broadstone No. 4-Zone A s3s.s8 s3s.s8
Broadstone No. 4-Zone B sas.o0 s38.06
Broadstone No. 4-Zone C s37.s2 SEZ.SZ
Broadstone No.4-Zone D sso.so s36.80
Cobble Ridge 5227.73 Srag.e+
Folsom Heights No.2 5227.70 5208.38
Natoma Vallev 5972.s6 S8s6.37
Prospect Ridge $t,zzo.n S1,173.86
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 s323.32 SSZS.SZ
The Residences s722.63 ss36.67
The Residences ll s1,499.93 sL,169.97
Sierra Estates s413.02 s363.68
Willow Creek East Eastates No 2-Zone A&B s1o3.s1 s1o3.s1 Willow Creek East Eastates No 2-Zone C sgs.rs sss.1s
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Silverbrook is subject to an annual assessment for S132.32. However, there will be a credit in 2022-23 due to sufficiency of fund balance for current maintenance needs.

On April g, 2Ot3 by Resolution No. 9137, the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District was dissolved. The City will no longer be responsible for maintain the improvements nor providing services within the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District.

Union Square a benefit zone of Natoma Station will be maintained and serviced by their Home Owner's Association and has not been levied since fiscal year 2009-10.

Each parcel or lot of land is described in the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Sacramento for the fiscal year 2022-23. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County' I hereby place opposite the Assessor Parcel Number for each parcel or lot within the Assessment Roll, the amount of the assessment for the fiscal year 2022-23 for each parcel or lot of land within the said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts.

Dated: June30,2O22
I
Engineer Work
John W. Bliss, License No. C52091
c 52091
**
4 c
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Assessment Diagram
The boundaries of the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts are displayed on the following Assessment Diagram.

The specific lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel are on file at the City.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

American
River
Canyon No. 3
^A,

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE

CITY OF FOLSOM, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

CALIFORNIA,THIS
-
DAY OF
2022.

NORTH CITY CLERK
American
River
Canyon No. 2

RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK

OF THECITY OF FOLSOM, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

CALIFORNIA, THIS
-
DAY OF
_,2022.

Wllow Creek
East Estates No. 2
Zone A
Zone B
Zone C

CITY CLERK
The

AN ASSESSMENT WAS CONFIRIVIED AND LEVIED

BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOIVI
ON THE LOTS. PIECES AND

PARCELS OF LAND ON THIS ASSESSIVIENT DIAGRAIU
ON THE
-
DAY OF
-,
2022FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.23 AND SAID
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ASSESSI\iIENT

ROLL FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR WERE FILED IN THE

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF THE COUNTY

OF SACRAMENTO ON THE DAY OF
at American
River Canyon
Lake
Natoma
Shores
2022. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO SAID

RECORDED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE EXACT

AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIED
AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND.

CITY CLERK
FTLED TH|S _ DAY OF _,
2022, AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK
-,
M. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY

AUDITOR OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF
THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF FOLSOIVI.
ffiEruro
Pairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
Prospect Ridge Note:

REFERFNCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE IVIAPS AND DEEDS

OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR OF THE
COUNTY OF SACRAI\iIENTO FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANY PARCELS SHOWN
HEREIN. THOSE I\4APS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS

CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH PARCELS,

EACH PARECL IS IDENTIFIED IN SAID MAPS BY ITS
DISTINCTIVE ASSESSORS'S PARCEL NUI\4BER.

Sierra Estates

CITY OF FOLSOM

LANDSGAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Hannaford
C ross
River
Natoma Valley
/_ __ s!/Brioos I
naiirr I
Hills Ridge ll/
Cobble
Ridge
Folsom
Heights
& Folsom
Blue
Ravine
Oaks
Blue
Ravine
Oaks
No. 2 Willow Creek
SouthNo. 2
'-
_i--
BroadstonJ- 'r
Broadstone
No.1&2andNo.4
No. 3
Natoma
Station
Wllow
SCI Consulting Group
4745 Mangels Btud
Falfield CA S4534
707-4304300 Page 111
07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Appendix A -- Budgets
The attached budgets for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are included for each of the Districts Category Descriptions
Fund Balance Calculation:

This calculation determines funds available in a district. This calculation includes the included funds remaining after being allocated to the estimated reserve.

Estimated Reserves
Estimated Reserve to finance approximately 6 months of the following year: This is approximately 45% of the operating and incidental costs of a Landscaping and Lighting District to fund the operations until collected revenue is received from the County.

Short-Term lnstallments
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within the next five years. [ong-Term I nstallments
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within five to thirty years.

Improvement Costs
General Maintenance Costs
. Scheduled: monthly landscape maintenance and service
r Unscheduled: unscheduled but potential costs for repairs (i.e. broken sprinklers and irrigation systems), replacements (i.e. remove and replace dead tree or irrigation controller), and other services (i.e. repair fence post or treat for a specific pest) not included in monthly maintenance and service costs
r Streetlights: repair and replace bulbs and ballasts in streetlights City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Service Costs
. Electrical: electric costs for streetlight maintenance and power to irrigation controllers r Water: water costs to irrigate landscaping
Current Year fmprovement Projects
Funded improvements planned to occur in the upcoming fiscal year lncidental Costs
Professional Services: consultant cost for Engineer's Report and lmprovement Plan Contract Services: other contracts or professional services such as backflow testing (yearly tests), vector control, graffiti removal, and streetlight pole replacement Publications/Mailings/Communications: yearly notices in public hearings, mailings to Advisory Committee Members, and telephone expenses
Staff: Landscaping and Lighting District Manager and/or inspector, clerical support, and/or other city staff.

Overhead: General overhead (Landscaping and Lighting Districts' share of general overhead categories such as City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager, etc,) and Department overhead (Landscaping and Lighting Districts' share of department overhead categories such as City Attorney, City Clerk and Finance Dept. Costs).

County Auditor Fee: Per Parcel Fee charged by County to put levy on tax bills Total lmprovement Costs
This is the total of all improvement costs budgeted for the upcoming year. This cost includes current improvements that are funded by fund balance monies. Fund balance monies are monies that have been collected in prior years in anticipation of being used for specific improvements and/or intended for replacement or improvement of capital items within a district.

Assessment to Property (Current)
This calculation takes the number of single-family equivalent benefit units and multiplies it by the amount that each property within a district is will be assessed for the upcoming year. This is the total assessment amount that will be generated by the properties within the District.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2A22-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

District Balance
The purpose of this calculation is to describe all costs expected to occur in the upcoming year, any installments being collected as part of the upcoming year's assessment and contributions from other sources. The outcome of the calculation is the total assessment for the district. A surplus would be applied and/or credited to the upcoming year's assessment. lf there are insufficient funds in the fund balance to cover the 6-month reserve, or the current and/or proposed improvements, then a deficit would exist. A deficit generally indicates that an increase in assessment may be necessary (requiring voter approval with a simple majority), however there may be a one-time reason for the deficit and an increase may not be necessary. Deficit situations are reviewed and analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Net Assessment Calculation
This calculation determines the net assessment after the surplus or deficit is factored into the calculation. lf a deficit exists, the net assessment will indicate that the assessment for the district might be too low. lf a surplus exists, the net assessment will indicate that the assessment for the district might be too high. Any increased adjustments require voter approval (simple majority).

Allocated Net Assessment to Property
This calculation takes the net assessment for the district that was calculated above (i.e. factoring in a surplus or deficit) and divides it by the number of single-family equivalent benefit units. The outcome of the calculation is the total allocated net assessment per single-family equivalent benefit unit. This calculation is generally the same as the allocated assessment however if there is a deficit it will indicate the revised amount that would be required to eliminate the deficit.

Conversely if there is a surplus the calculation would show the amount that the assessment could be reduced by and still cover the anticipated costs for current and future years.

Comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Shows a comparison of the net assessment and the current assessment and indicates a per parcel deficit or surplus.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Stortinq Fund Bdlance (as otApril 2022)
Estimated ReseNe to Jinonce approx. JiBt 6 months of 22-23 S106,2o4.19
(546,e81.82)
Clty of Folsom
herican Rlver Nonh bnds€aping and Lithtint Dlstrld
Fund 253
2022-29
lmorovement &ss
General Mainten.nce CoSs

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduledr
3- Streetlights*

4. lrdgation
9o.oo
So-oo
ss,s00.oo
s11,OOO.OO
SsryEclEE

5. ElecFical* s3O,O0O.OO
53s,000.00
current Year lmbrovement Prolects

7. sien rehab, ladderfuel removal s65,0OO.OO
subtotdl of ltem 7 S6s,m.m
subtotal s146,sO0.OO
bdCel!3!.less

8. Professional Seruices (EnClneer's Repod and lP)
L Contract Seruices {all oth€r contra€ts and seruices)* 1o. Publications/Mailings/communications
11- staff

12. overh€ad

13. county Auditor Fee
57so.oo
So.oo
9o.oo

50.oo
s4,966.OO
ss93.s4
$8,309.54
Total lmprovement Cosis Srs2,8o9.54
A$esrment to Propefrv lcur.€ntl
Asessment per Sinele Familv Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Unlts
s102.94
7,O22
$1O5,2O4.6a
n$allment Cois lsee installmeht Plan and Summaru n€t oase) Shod-Term lnstallment Plan {previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colle€ted)
shod-Term tnstallment Plan {colle€ted this year)
LonB-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
ToEl lnsallm€ht 6$s
so.oo
s14,695.OO
So.oo
So oo
s14,595.O0
Dl*rl.t Balance
Total Assessment to propeny
Total Improvement Cosb
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cosc
conFibutions f rom other sources
Net Balance
S1o5,2o4.6a
(s1s2,8O9.s4)
(s47,604.86)
ssg,222.31
s11,617.51
{sx4,695.o0)
So.oo
153,071.49)
District Balanc€ lsurplus is +; deticit is 0) l$3,077.49) Net Assessment Glc!lation
Surplus or Deficit {surplus is sublracted; deficit is added} Net Assessment
$1o5,2o4.08
33,077.49
sroa,2a2,77
Alss!c!L!e!-AEe!:4edls.L@!v
Net Assessment
Single Family Equival€nt Benefit Unib
Allocaled Net Asessment to Property
91O8,282.U
4 S10s.9s
Comparlson ot Net Assessmeht and Assesiment
Allocated Nel As.essment to Propefry
Allocated Ass€ssm€ht to Propedy
Per P.r.el Surplus {+} or D€tlclt G)
($1os'9s)
-tgc3-
(S3'o1)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

American River Canyon North - lnstallment Summary
American River Canyon NorthDistrict:
2022-2tFiscal Year:
s6s.179Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
So s0 So So SoSo So $oTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
s33.333 Sloo.ooos1.200 S14,69s s3,333 S13,333 s16,667 S33,333Waterfall Pond Liner (concrete and other) s2.500 Slo.ooo s12,s00 S2s,ooo s2s,000 s7s,000S2,soo soWaterfall pumps, autofill, filters, clorination systern s175.000S14.69s ss.833 S23.333 s29,167 SsB,333 s58,333fotals: S3,7oo i rl,r'r r.,.rr 'i V,-, :i "/, lrl ,l
,) i:l lt'.) '):t) )t.)
r,',f i1 ''
) (1 ).1
rrlil ti''i:l
ir iir; illl til,iiilt.i il:l:ii rr
.lil l.;rilft r,i...i1i(irji), ll,irlii,l{:ltt,, ;:j ilrr-t, City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Stortins Fund Balance (os of April 2022)
Estimoted Reseve to ftnance opprox.JiEt 6 monttu of 22-23 $168,618.22
(Ss,ss1.82)
€lty of Folsom
Merlcan River Cahyoh Nonh No. 2 Landscaping and LiShtinA Dlstrlct Fund 27O - llShts OhlY
2022-23
lmprovement Co*s
General Malntenanc€ Co*s

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlishts
so.oo
So.oo
53O,OOO.OO
Seruice Costs

4. Electracal s1,OOO.OO
So.oo
Orr€nt Year lmprovement Proiects

6. LED conversion s2s,000.00
Subtotal oJ ltem 6 S2s,ooo.oo
s56,0OO.OO
lhcld€ntal Coss

7. Professional seruices (Ensineer's Repod and lP)
a. Contract Seruices (3ll other contracts and services)

9. Publications/Mailings/communications

10. Staff

11. overhead

12. countyAuditor Fee
s75O.OO
So.oo
so.oo
So.oo
S631.oo
S94.4o
Subtotal
Total lmprov€ment cods
s1.475.40
ss?,475.40
\ssesment to Probetv lcurrent)
Assessment oer Sinsle Famaly €quivalent
Sinsie Famllv Equlvalent Benefit Units
S7t.1o
150
S12,432.o0
niallmenr cods lsee in$allmcnt Plan and Summarv nen baee) Shod-T€rm lnstallment Pian (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shofr-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total ln$allment 6sts
So.oo
S203,688.o0

50.o0
s16,OOO.O0
s219,68a.O0
)lstrict Balance
Total ksessment
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment costs
Contributions from other sources
s12,432.0O
(ss7,47s.4O)
(s4s,043.40)
5163,055.4O
s118,023.0o
(s219,638.00)
so.oo
(s101,665.00)
Distrlct aalance (surplus is +; dellcit is 0) {5101,66s.00) s12,432.m
suplus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) -i1@-$114,097.m
s114,O97.@
J
s713.11
Allocated Nei Assessment to ProDeitv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
Qmbarlson of Net Assessment and Ass€ssment
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
Per Parcel surplus {+) or Deflclt G)
(S713.11)
-w9-
(9G3s.41)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

American River Canyon North No' 2 - Installment Summary llishts)American River Canyon North #2Distrist:
2022-23Fiscal Year:

S170,4s8Fund Balance
Short Term lnstallment Summary
So SO 5o soSO So $o$oTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
s10.000 s20,000 s20,000 s6o,oooSs7.s87 S2,ooo s8,oooS2,oooles 250 Sso.ooo Sso,ooo S24o,ooos66.101 S8,ooo S32,ooo S4o,ooos8,000Pole Replacement Sloo,ooo S3oo,oooSlo.ooo S4o,ooo Sso,ooo sloo,oooSlo,ooo S123,G88Totals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGrouP

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23

stoding Fund Balonce (ds ol Aptil 2022)
Estimoted Reserue to Jinance dpptox. litst 6 months oJ 22-23 51,O11,292.O1
(s110,8X8.77)
6€n.ral Maintehance Cosis
s2so,m.m _
s373,600.00
s250,OOO.OO
Subtotal

1. S€heduled

2. Unscheduled

3. StreetlighB

4. lriigation Pads
Sgrv!!919$s

5. Electrical
$7so.oo
5o.oo
So.oo
s1s,3s1.OO
ss,387.OO
s542.54
subtotal
Total lmprovement costs
s22,030.s4
s395,630.54
STo,ooo.oo
sso,o0o.oo
so.oo
S3,3oo.oo
s300.oo
so.oo
Current Year lmorovemeht Proiects

7. Landscapeimprovements
a. Professionai seruices (Engineer's Repoft ahd lP)

9. Contract seruices (all othercontBcts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailinas/communications

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
Assessment per Single Family Equivalent
Slngle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total Asessment 524a,752.46
s269.86
91S 56
Short-Term lnstallmeht Plan lpreviously collected)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shoft-Term lnstallment Plan {collected this yea.)
Long-Term lnstallmeht Plan (collected this year)
Total lhstallm€nt coss 3769,[email protected]
5128,OOO.OO
s597,OOO.OO
s12,0O0.o0
s32,OOO.OO
Total Assessm€nt
Total lmprovement costs
Subtota I
Total Available Funds
Annual lnstallment (collected this year)
contributions lrom other sources
Dlstrlct Balance (surplus ls +r defi.li ls ())
s24B,1s2.46
{s39s,630.54)
lst47 ,47a.oal
(s16,0&.841
59OO,473.24
s752,995.16
{s759,OOO.OO)
So.oo
(s16,0O4.84)
surplus or Deficit {surplus ls subtractedj deficit is added) s248,152.45
-!1144
s254,1s7.30
Clty ot Folsom
Ameri6n Rlver Canyon North No. 3 LandscaplnA and Llghting Distrid Fund 27S
2022-2e
allocat€d Net assessment to Proo€dv
Net Asessment
single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
s2641s7.30
-- s287.26
Combarison of Net Asse$ment and Ass€ssmeht
(9287.25)
---t4gg-($17.4o)
Allocated Assessment to PropertY
Per Parc€l surplos (+) or D€tlclt G)
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

American River Canyon North No, 3 - lnstallment Summary District: American River Canyon North S3
2022-2?Fiscal Year:

Fund Balance 12022) S1,078,365
Short Term lnstallment summarv
s3.000 S 1s.ooolrrisation controller uoErade-centralized {1 controller) S4.ooo So s4,000 s4,000 s4,ooo S4,ooo s13.000 s3.000 s3.000 s3.000 s3.000 s3.000 s60,000SisnaPe ReDlacement S2,ooo s2.000 s2.000 S25.oooS4,ooo S8.ooo s2,000 S2,ooo S2,oooMvstic Hills replace missing landscape s8.000 s100.000s10.000 s21,000 59,ooo S9,ooo 59,ooo $9,oooTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
s1.000 s12.000 s1.000 s1.000 S1.ooo s1.000 s1.000 STs,oooWaterfall Rock Repair ss.000 ss.000 s350.000Ss,ooo s60,000 Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss,oooBaldwin Dam Path Repair S5.ooo s60.000 Ss.ooo S5.ooo ss.000 ss,000 s5.000 s300,000Tree and landscape imDrovement (or replacement) E2.000 s2.000 S2.ooo s135.000S2,ooo s163,000 92,000 s2,000ARC Drive/Canyon Falls (Cascade perimeter), landscape/ remove, reDlace trees,mow band replacement
s10.000 s10-000 Slo.ooo s10-000 Slso.oooMain Walkins Trail landscaDins. irrieation. stairs. clean-up s10,000 s102,000 Slo,ooo s23.000 323.ooo s23.000 s23.000 323.ooo s1,010,000Totals: s23,000 s397,000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

startins Fund Bolonce (as oJ Aptil 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to linonce apprcx. fitst 5 montht oJ 22-23 S1oo,274.sg
(s16,107.s3)
ciry of Folsom
Blue Ravlne Oaks landscapln8 and lithtint Distrld
Fund 25O
2022-2t
General Maintehahce Costs

1. Scheduled

2. Uns€heduled

3. Streetlights
so.oo
so-oo
S1,zoo.oo
S€ruice ftsts

4. Electrical S4,ooo.oo
512,sOO.OO
Curreht Year lmErov€ment Proi€cts
6- No Planned Prcjects so.oo
subtotdl oJ ltem 6 Sm
917,7O0,OO

7. Professional seruices (Engineer's R€poft and lP)
a- contract SeNlces (all other contracts and servlces)
e. Pu bl icati ons/Ma i I i nss/c ommu ni.a ti ons

10. Staff

12. county Auditor Fee
s750.OO
So.oo
so.oo
so.oo
s1,496.00
Ss7.3s
subtotal
Total lmprovement Co*s
Sr"3#
$zo,q3.3s
Assessment per Sinsle Family Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
s218.50
155
$35,059.O0
ln*allm€nt Costs lsee installment Plan and Summarv ned paee) short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Lohg-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
short-Term lnstallment Plan {collected thas year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan {coilected this year)
Toial lnstallment co*s
S11,ooo.oo
so.oo
s1,OOO.OO
so.oo
312,000,OO
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallmeht cost
Contdbutions from other sources
s36,069.00
(s20,043.3s)
$16,025.6s
S84,167.0s
s1O0,192.70
(sx2,ooo.oo)
So.oo
saa,!92.7O
Distrlct Balance (surplus ts +; deficit ls 0) s8&192.70 s35,059.OO
Surplus or Deficit (surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) 1s88.192.701 (ss2,123.70)
Allocated Net Assessment to Propertv
SihBle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
($s2,123.7O)
J
l$31s.9o)
comoarison of N€t Assssment and Assersment
Allo.ated Net Assesshent to Propenv
Allocated Assessment to ProPerty
Per Parcel surFlus (+) or Deticit (-)
s31s.9O
,,1?!9.!o
s534.sO
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Blue Ravine Oaks - lnstallment Summary
District: Blue Ravine Oaks (The Shores)
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance {2022) S108,044
Short Term lnstallment Summary
So s0 s0 So So Sofotals: $o $o
Long Term lnstallment Summary
ss.000 Sso.ooo Ss,ooo Ss.ooo S5,ooo s130,000Blue Ravine wall renair Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss.ooo s5.000 Ss,ooo s130,000Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Sso,oooTotals:
i ;il,tl"ll./,.r tJ j
:i .t:, iii, I rilr,r; I'
'\i;rr rr', tiil ii
)i:\) :)
' ,.|,t'ii ,
i. !i, i;
{"lrtlti:rrr,
)i,,.\t \')i) )\j;rl,tI ,, i
1t lii lli,lrlitfl,
'ri,r.liil,- 'irrt,1'.,.rr ,', '1
"r,, ; ' I t'r
:;ijl.):\ift,.t). '.)t().:).r ,tttt,)..,t',1 ,iL) I'j tri,l 1, 'i' i.-i, I
i ,')1:rj,)r irl:i
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
stortins fund Bdtonce (as oJ Aptil 2022)
Estlmated ReseNetoJindnce apprcx. fhst 6months oJ 22'23 s180,575.m
(s1s,714.Os)
CliYol Folsom
Blue Ravine Oak No.2bndscaplngand UAhtina Distrid
Fund 27a
2022-23
€elEElM3i4glsE€leslt

1. 2.

3. Streetlights
S22,@o.06
s15,@0.@
so.s
s1,3m-@
5erul.e Cosb

5. 6.

Eledrical So.m
So.@
Curent Year lmorovement Proleds

7. Dripconve.sion/F€ncereplacefrent s15,W.m
SubtotaloJ lkm a S15,O0O.m
Subtotal s$,3e.06
a. Professional Seruices (Enelneer's Report and lP)

9. Contract Seruices (all other contracts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailinss/communicatiohs

11. Statf

12. overhead

13. CountyAuditorFee
s7so.m
so.@
so.oo
s4,O8O.@
s99O.@
s97.35
Subtoral s5,917.3s
s59,297.41Total lmprovement Costs
Assessment per sincle Family Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
5213.26
165
s3t187.S
lnstallmenr Costs ls€€ installmeht Plah and Summ.ryhext oa!€l shod Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleded)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plah {previously collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan {colleded this year)
Total lnsiallmehtcosis
s6,@0.@
s33,@O.OO
S1,mo.oo
54,2@.@
54,U.@
qi$d4E3fc@
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Costs
subtotal
Total available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
contributions from oth€r sources
N€t Balance
s35,187.s
(ssg,297.41)
{s24,109.s1)
91fl,9m.95
s14,851.4
(s4,8m.OO)
So.m
596,051.e
Dlstild Balanle lsurFlus ls+; dellcltis ()) S$,0s1.4
Surplus or Deficit {surplus is subtradedi deficit is added) $35,r87.s
(ss,051.{l
(s@,863.v)
Allo.ated Net Assessmehtto ProDenv
Single Family Equivaleht Benefit Units
allo€ated Net assessment to Propedy
(ss,s3.e)
155
($34.87)
Comoailsonof NeiAsse.smentandAssessmeht
allocated Net Assessmeni to Property
Allocated Assessmentto PropetY
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Deficit (-)
s3S.87
s2A.26
ss82.13
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 - lnstallment Summary
Blue Ravine Oaks No,2District:
2022-23Fiscal Year:
s180,67sFund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
S1.ooo s1.000 51,000 S1.ooo S3s,ooos1.000 S1,ooo s1,oooTree Removal/Replacement (Blue Ravine Road) S1.ooo s3s.00031.000 s1,000 S1.ooo s1,000 $1,ooo$1,oooTotals:
[ong Term lnstallment Summary
S1.2oo s1.200 s1,200 S1,zoo s1,200 s6s,000S1,2oo s3.600Fence Replacement on Rilev s80.000S7.5oo S2.soo s2,s00 S2,soo S2,soo S2,sooS2,sooIree RemovaUReplacement ss00 Ssoo S4,oooss00 s1,s00 Ssoo Ssoo SsoosiEnaee Reolacement s4.200 s4.200 S149.ooo312.600 s4.200 S4,20o S4,2oo$4,200fotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

staning Fund Bolan.e (os oJAptil2022)
Estimated BeseNeto lhone apptox. Jirst 6months of 22-a
{s9,396.@)
(s36,s1.32)
Cltyof Folsom
Brlgs ench bndscapingand Uthting Distrid
Fuhd il5
m22-2?
General Maintenanc€ Costs

1. 2.

3. 4.

Streetlights
ItriAation
s66,s2.9s
915,@.@
54,s@.@
s2,soo.oo
Serulce Costs

5. 6.

Electrical s9,mo-oo
sa,soo.m
Currcnt Year horovement Proied5
7- No planned projeds so.@
subtotoloJ ltem 7 so.m _
s105,s2.9sSubtotal
a. Professional serulces (Engin€er's Repodand lP)

9. contract Services (all othercontrads and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailings/conmunications

11. Staff

12. overhead

13. countyAuditorFee
STso.oo
So.oo
So'@
st2,727.@
s2,96s.OO
s389.41
Subtotal s16,a31.41
3L2,374.36Total lmprov€ment Costs
&sessment to Propenv {cutrent}
Assessment per sintle Famlly Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Srz2.za
560.01
Ss.7s.02
nsbllmenr costs lsee insiallm€nt Plan and SummaB n€xt barel shot-Term lnstallment Pl.h {previously colleded)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleded)
shod-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plan {collected this year)
Total lhstallment cosc
sso,5m.@
59s,o7o.m
s2,Om.m
53,410.@
91s,9e,e
Distrid Balance
Total Assessment
Total lmprov€ment costs
subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total Installment cost
Contributions f rom other sources
Net Balance
sao,706.02
{s122,374.36)
(s41,668.33)
{s4s,437_32)
{587, los- 6s)
(s1so,98O-OO)
sooo
(s238,o85.65)
Dlstdd Balance (surylus ls +; deficit is 0) (s2S,085.5s) Ne!4!:@!!eEclegs!
s&,7S,02
slrplus or Deficit (surplus is subtractedj deficit is added) -*@E-
s31&791.ff
Allocated NetAssessment to Probefl
NetAssessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefil Units
Allocated N€t Assessment to Prop€fty
s38,791.@
S€3.01
Comparisonol NetAssessmentandAsressment
Allocated Net Assessment to Prop€rty
allocated asessmentto Property
PerParc€l surplus l+) or Dellclt {-}
(S43.01)
s122.8
(5350.73t
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Briggs Ranch - Installment Summary
District: Briggs Ranch
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) (ss,3e6l
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Aporox,
Proiect Yearlv Prior Years Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total lnstallment Collections 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Required Shrub and tree upgrades (E. Natoma & Blue Ravine) Slo.ooo S17,ooo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Sso.ooo Fence/Wall repair/replacement Slo,ooo S17,ooo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo ss00 Ssoo Sso,ooo Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma partial) S2.ooo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s50,000 Pet Stations repair/replacement S2,ooo S6,ooo S5oo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo S6,ooo Totals: s24,000 s40,s00 S2,ooo S2,ooo s2.000 s2.000 s2.000 S1s6.ooo Long Term lnstallment Summary
AbDrox.

Proiect Yearly Prior Years Year 1 Years 2-5 Years 5-10 Years 10-20 Years 20-30 Total lnstallment Collections 2018 20L9-2022 2022-2027 2027-2037 2037-2047 Required Bollard repair/replacement 52,000 S3s,o2o s410 S41o s410 541o $410 S6o,ooo Fence repair/replacement (Blue Ravine Partial) s4,000 S8,ooo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo ssoo S6o.ooo Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial) S4,ooo 58,ooo ss00 ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Sso,ooo Entrv Sisn Replacement (brass lettering) s1,000 S3,soo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s10,000 irrigation upgrades/replacement (3 controllers) Sz,ooo Ss,ooo ssoo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,ooo Landscape lighting uperades or replacement Ss,ooo S9,soo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s7s,000 Tree and landscape improvement (partial collection) Sz,ooo Ss,ooo Ssoo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s10,000 Totals: S2o,ooo S7s,o2o S3,410 s3.410 S3.410 s3.410 S3.410 s28s,000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
.lClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Clty oI Folsom
Broeditone tandscaping and Ughting Distrid
fund 210
ao22-23
!Ese!rDc$l9$!
General Malntenan6€co5ts

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlight.
sx11,404.m
s0.00
So.oo
servic€ Coss
547,soo.oo
s145,000.00
Current Y€ar lmprov€ment Prolects

6. No Planned Prcjects So.m

0.00 Subtotal Ss3.9re
lncld€ntal cods

7. Professional SeNices (Enginee/s Repofr and lP)

8. conhact SeNic€s {all other€onvacts and seMc€s)

9. Publications/Mailings/communication5

10. staff

11. ovefi€ad

12. County Alditor Fee
s7so.00

90.oo

50.oo
ss4,909.00
59,s76.00
$1,397.70
Subtotal s65,632.70
Totai lmprovement costs S370,s36.70
Assessment per single Family Equivalent
Slngle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
S164.s9
2,368.99
s390,859.65
nstallm€nl cofs lsee ln*allmeni Plah and Summarv nen oaiel Shod-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment PIan {previously collected)
Shon-Term lnstallment Plan {collected this yead
tong-Term lhstallrent Plan {collected this Year)
total lndallment hds
s7,500.00
s72,s00.00
$1,soo.oo
s14,500.00
$96,000.00
Di$ri.t Salance
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Tdal Available Funds
Iotal Funds
Total lnstallmentcost
contributions f rom oth€r sources
Net Balance
s390,859.66
(5370,s36.701
s20,322.96
{9285,870.29)
{s255,s47.33)
{s96,000.Oo)
So.oo
(S362,s47.33)
Dlsiri.t Balance lsurplus is +; delicil is l)) (S352,547.r3) Net Assesrment 6lculation
s390,8s9.66
Surplus orDeficit {sunlus is subtEct€d; deficit b added) __l!!?.!1?!3 s753,405.99
allocated N€t Asse$ment to Propenv
9753,405.99
Single Family Equivalent Eenefit Units
Allocated Net ksessmentto Propeny s318.03
stanins Fund Bolance (as oJ Aptil 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to Jinance approx. Jitst 6 months oJ 22-23 {s112,322.00)
(s174,s48.29)
Comparisn of Net Ass.$m€nt and A$essment
Allocated N€t Assrrm€nr ro Property
Allocated Ass€ssm€nt to ProPerty
Per Parc€l surplus (+l or Deficit l-l
(s318.03)
s164.99
ts153.04)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Broadstone 1 and 2 - Installment Summary
BroadstoneDistrict:
2022-21Fis6lYear:
$L12,322)Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
ss00 So ss00 S5oo Ssoo Ssoo ssoo s25,000free & Landscaoe lmDrovements (partial fund collection) s0 sso0 ss00 ss00 ss00 Ssoo Sls,oooBollar reoair/reolacement {40) ssoo ssoo ss00 ss00 ss00 ss00 s10,000Ssoo StLisht polefixture replacement of KW ss0.00031.500 So S1.50o s1,s00 s1,s00 s1,500 91,soofotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
s1.000 S1.ooo s1.000 ss0.000s1.000 So s1,ooo s1,oooRepair irrisation/replace shrubs lron Point median ss.000 s150.000ss.000 So Ss,ooo ss,000 Ss,ooo ss,ooofree & landscape imDrovement (or replacement) ss.000 So ss.000 ss,000 Ss,ooo Ss,ooo S5,ooo s1,000,000shrub reblacement - throushout (some irrisation repair) 28 acres s0 ss00 ss00 ss00 S5oo ss00 slo,oooLandscaDe light reolacement sso0 s500 s500 ss00 s500 ss00 S11,oooSsoo SoPet station replacement (7) ssoo s500 ss00 S4o.oooss00 So Ssoo SsooSienase repair/replacement s200.000s1.500 So S1.soo S1,soo s1,500 s1,soo s1,5ooTurf removal/irrisation retrofit s4s,oooEs00 So ss00 S5oo Ssoo Ssoo sso0lrrisation uDsrades and flow {15 controllers) S14-soo s14.s00 s14.S00 s14.500 s14.500 s1.515.000s14,s00 9oTotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Stortihs Fund Bolance (as ol Aptil 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to lihonce opprox. lirst 6 months oJ 22 23 557,73a.13
(S10,172.83)
City of Folsom
Broadstone 3 Lands.aping and Lighting District
Fund 2O9 - StreetllShts Ohly
2022-23
!.!!p!s!e.!!!.!ll9$!
Gen€ral Maintenahc€ CoSs

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights
5o.oo
$o.oo
512,5O0.00
Servlce Costs

4. Electri€al s2,OO0.O0
So.oo
Current Year lmprovement Proiects

6. LED conveEion Slo,ooo.oo
Subtotol ol ltem 6 1O,OOO.OO _
s24sO0.00
hcidental 6sts

7. Professional seruiEes (En8iheer's Repod and lP)

8. contract Seruices (all other contracts and seruices)

9. PubliEations/Mailinss/Communications

10. Staff

11. Overhead

12. county Auditor Fee
STso.oo
So.oo
So.oo
5o.oo
51,435.00
S599.oo
Subtotal
Total lmprovement Costs
9r.8m
-G6t
qssessment to Propertv lcurrent)
Sinale Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total Assescmeni
s28.07
411.53
s22,779.65
nnallm€nt Costs lsee lhstallheht Plan and Summarv ne* pa.el Shod-Term hstallment Plan {previously collected)
tons-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shon-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
LonC-Term lnstallment Plan (collected rhis year)
Total lnstallment &sts
So.oo
Ss,ooo.oo
So.oo
9o.oo
Ss,ooo.oo
Dlstrlct Salance
Totai Asessmenr
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Avallable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
contdbutions from other sources
Net Balance
522,779.65
(S27,38s.0o)
(54,60s,3s)
5s8,10s.90
$s3,soo.ss
lSS,ooo.oo)
So oo
S48,5oo.ss
District Salan.e (5urplus is +; deficit is 0l s48.500,55 Net Assessment Calculation
s22,779.53
Surplus or Deficit (surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) -{@I
(s2s,720,90)
Alloceted N€t Asessment to Propedv
5ingle Family Equivalent Behefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
ts2s,720.90)
-
(S31.5s)
5s9.76
Comparlson of Net Assessment and A$essm€nt
s31.69
--$492-Allocated Assessment to Properly
Per Parcel surplus (+) or D€flclt (-)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Broadstone 3 - lnstallment Summary
Broadstone #3District:
2022-29Fiscal Year:

S39,886Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
So SO 9o So So So$o soTotal
Long Term lnstallment Summary
s8,333 sr6,667 s15,667 Sso,oooss.000 Ss,ooo s1,667 56,667Paint Streetlieht Poles (350 poles) S16.667 ss0.000s5.000 s1,667 s6,657 s8,333 s16,667Total $s,ooo City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlGonsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23

gdhq Fund Belilce la ol AFil n22)
EsIinM Mee b fnace qNox frBl 6 n$lhs d 22-23
AvailablsFundE
s166,588.00
(S6,m.s)
mprcvmenl&d6
Genenl Malnlonanco6*

1. Scheduled
2 Unschdulsd

3. Sbetighb

4. hgaljon
$1S,000.00
$15,000.00
142,500.00
$5,m0.00
SrryE Adg

5. Elechcal

6. Wabr
$0.00
$o.oo
Cumnl Yoil lnpmvamonl Preie*

7. Tee pruning 075,000.00
il&old of ten 6 $75@.@
lg7,sqO
lnddonhl &d!

8. Pohssiond S€ruices (Engin6o/s Ropoiland lP)
L ContactS€flices (all ohr contub and seruices)

10. PSlicatonilailingY&mmunicatons

11. Shff

12. Ov€frsad
13 CounlyAdiuFee
$750.00
$0.00
$0.00
$6.39S.00
$7,90.00
g2l.s
Tolal lmpreremcnl &dB
315.210S
rs-dF
Es6smenl to PreFtu lcumnl)
tusesmenlper Singl€ Fmily Equtualenl
Single Fmily Equivalenl Beref t Unib
$3.s8
2,065.05
$2,5m.53
n$llhonlQsl6(slndallm6ilPlanandSummaryns{p4s}
ShoruTem lrehllmentPla (pr€viousv collecbd)
Long'Tem lnsbllmenl Plan (pEviously collocbd)
Shod-Tem lmbllment Pld (collecbd his yer)
loE-Tem lnsHlmenl Pla[ (collecbd his yee)
Told lnshllmMtCods
$7,ffi.m
&.m
$1,ffi.00
$.oo
s,mo00
Tobl A$osm€nl
Tobl hpmvem6nt&sb
Subbbl
Tobl Availdl€ Funds
Tohl Flnds
Tohl hshllmentCost
ft nhbutons fom oher sorc€s
NetBdance
$e.s0.s
($$2,710.S)
($280,149.S)
$12S,718.S
($150,4ffi)
(@,000.00)
$0.00
($fJ'43ffi)
Di*jd Balane (surylus ls +; dof cil is 0) (tl59,{i.3q
ftlk6sm6d &lculalion
t82,$0.53
SuplosorDefcil(s$plusissubhcbd;defcilisadded) t159,41.S 12t1,991.S
12t1,991.S
265
tl17.i8
Clty ol Foliom
Ero.drton. ltlo.4 Lrnd3ceping rnd Lighting District
Fund 202
2022-23
Alo6led llel Ass6smsnt 1o Prcpoft
Single Family Eqdvabnl Beref t Unib
Alo€bd MlAss€ssmenlb Pmp€ry
ompadson of lLl Asssmsnl and assmont
Alodod Mkesmlnllo PreFdy
Alo6ted b6m€nt 10 Prcpoiy
P6r Pa@l SurplG (+) or hticil ( )
(1117.1E
11998
lnl 2q
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

PageTL
Broadstone 4 - Installment Summary
Broadstone No.4District:
2022-2?Fiscal Year:
s166.588Fund Balance (2022)
s1.000 s1.000 s1.000 ss0.000s1.000 So S1,ooo S1,oooReoair irrisation/reolant shrubs Rathbone, Knofler, other interior areas S5oo So Ssoo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo ssoo S6,oooLandscaoe lipht reoair/reolacement (60 lishts) So s1.500 s1.s00 s1.s00 91.soo s1,s00 ss6,000fotal Sl,soo Lons Term lnstallment Summarv
So so s0So So So So 5oTotal
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page72
stanins Fund Bdldnce (as oJ April 2022)
Estimated Resetue to Jinance approx-JiRt 6 months oJ 22 23 (s1s,8O7.OO)
(s19,5s4.43)
City ofFolsom
cobble Hllls lllRetledions ll tandscaping and Liahtina Dlsrrid Fund 214
2022-23
lmprov€ment 6ds
G€n€ral Malntenanc€ 6fs

2. Unscheduled

3. StreetlighG

4. lrdgation
525,218.38
$5,ooo.oo
s1,250.OO
s2,50O.OO
lcryisslgllg

5. Electri€al $2,ooo.oo
s1O,5OO.OO
curr€nt Year lmprovem€nt Proi€cts

7. No Planned Projects So.oo
subbtol of ltem 7 So.@
Subtotal s46,558.3a
lncid€ntal &ns
a. Professional Seruices (Eneineer's Repod and lP)

9. contract seruices {all other contracts and seruices} 1o. Publi€ations/Mailings/communications
U. Staff
X2. ovetread
X3. county Auditor Fee
5750.OO
so.oo
So.oo
s9,151.00
$1,948.00
S229.s1
Subtotal 312,O78.51
Total lmprovemeht 6sts Ss8,66,89
Asse$ment to Propertv lCuirent)
Assessment per single Family Equivalent
SinEle Famlly Equlvalent Beneflt Units
sx13.14
s4,o[.46
ln$allment Co*s (see installment Plan and Summarv net pasel shod-Term lhstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
shofr-Term lnstallment Plan (colle€ted this year)
Lone-Term lnstallment Plan (€oll€cted this year)
Total lnstallmenr costs
s93,8s6.O0
s109,OOO.OO
So.oo
Su,ooo.oo
S213,a56.0o
Toial ksessment
Total lmprovement costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions fiom oth€r sources
Net Balance
s44,011.46
(ss8,646.89)
{S14,63s.43}
(S3s,461.43)
{ss0,096.86)
(s213,8s6.00)
5s,0oo.oo
(5258,9s2.85)
Dlsrlct Balancc lsurplus ls +; deflclt ls {}} {925E,952.66) Surplus or Deficit {surplus is subt€cted, defi.it is added) S{,o11,46
___5?E!,eE349-
s302,964.32
Allocated Net Asersment to ProEertv
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Asessment to Property
5302,964.32
349
S778.83
Comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Allocated Net As.essment to Propeny
Per Pareel Surplus {+} or Deficlt {-}
1s778.83)
-$s11
(9665.69)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Cobble Hills Ridge - lnstallment Summary
Cobble Hills lllReflections llDistrict:
2022-21Fiscal Year:
(s1s,807)Fund Balance {2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summarv
s0 So So ss0,000ss.000 S38,8s6 Ss,ooo Ss,ooolree & landscape improvements (or replacement) So s40,000s10.000 $s,ooo s10,000 Slo,ooo s10,000 Slo,oooMini Park & Path to Lembi Turf and Shrub Repair/Replacement s10.000 So Sgo,oooSls.ooo S43,8sG Sls,ooo Sls,ooo Slo,oooTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
s1.000 s1.000 Slo,oooS1,ooo s6,500 S1,ooo s1,000 S1,oooFence Repair/Replacment (225 ft) s40.000S1.ooo s3s,s00 S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,oooWall Reoairs and Paintinp {628 ft} S7.soo S5.ooo Ss.ooo S5,ooo Ss,ooo S5,ooo s65,000Ss,ooo s1.000 S1,ooo s1.000 S1,ooo Sls,oooS1,ooo So S1,oooShrub Replacement-Siblev and Corner s1.000 s1.000 S8,oooS1.ooo S 1,soo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,oooSisnase Repair/Reolacement ss3.600S2.ooo s3,000 s2.000 S2,ooo S2,ooo s2,000 S2,oooTree & landscaoe imorovements (or replacement) S11.ooo s11.000 S11.ooo S191,600S11,ooo ss4,000 S11,ooo 511,oooTotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page74
stdrtins Fund Roldnce (ds oJ April 2022)
Estimated Resetue to linonce apprcx. fltst 6 months ot22 23 s177,ss9.OO
(55,111.25)
City ot Folsom
cobble Rldge Landscaplng ahd Lighting Distrid
Fund 234
2022-23
General Maintehanc€ coss

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. lrrigation
s8,186.67
s3,OOO.OO
575O.OO
s4OO.OO
Servlce Costs

5. Electrical S5oo.oo
51,250.00
current Year lmprovement Paole.ts

7. Fence repair/Plant & bark s500.oo
s5@.@ _
$14586.67Subtotal

8. Professional Seruices (Ensineels Repod and lP)

9. Contract seruices (all other contracts and services) 1O. Publications/Mailings/communications

11. Staff

12. Overhead
s750.00
so.oo
So.oo
51,03O.OO
5422.oo
Ss7.B213. county Auditor Fee
5ubtotal
Total lmprovement 6sts
s2,259.A2
s16,846.49
Ass€ssment to Pro!€rtv {Currentl
Assessment per stngle Family Equivalent
Slngle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total A$essment
S139.64
s13,6&.72
Shon Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
Long-Term lhstallment Plan (previously collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan {collected this year)
tong-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnnallment costs
so2so.oo
s3qooo.oo
S1,25o.oo
s1,000.o0
s38,Sm,OO
ol$rlct Balahce
Total Asessment
Total lmprovement Costs
subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Fuhds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions f rom other sources
Net Balance
st3,6a4.72
(s16,846.49)
{s3,161.77)
9atL,447.14
s158,28s.97
(s38,sOO.OO)
9o,oo
sa29,7A5.97
Dldrict Balance (surplus is +; deflclt ls ()l S129,785.97 Net As*srment Glculatioh
surplus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) Net Assessment
s13,684.72
tsr29,785.97)
($116,1o1.2s)
Allocated Net Assessment to ProE€rtv
Net Assessment
Single FamllV Equlvalent Benefit Units
Allo€ated Net Asessment to Property
(s115,1O1.25)
9a
(s1,184.71)
Comparison of Net A$essment and Assessment
Allocared Net Assessment to Property
Allocated Ass€ssment to Prop€rtv
Per Par(el surplus (+l or oeficit G)
s1,184.71
-$ry-
sr,324.35
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Cobble Ridge - lnstallment Summary
District: Cobble Ridee
2022-23Fiscal Year:

Fund Balance {2022) 5t77,ssg
Short Term lnstallment Summarv
vear 2 Drunins S2so So Szso Szso Szso Szso s2s0 S3,ooo
So S2so Szso S2so S25o S2so S3,ooovear 3 Drunins s2s0
S3.ooovear 4 orunins S2so So Szso S2so S2so S2so S2so
s250 So Szso s2s0 s2s0 S25o S2so S3,ooovear 5 pruning
ss.000Fence reoair and oaintinp s2s0 5o S2so s2s0 s2s0 52so 52so S1.2so S1.2so S1.250 S17.oooTotals: S1,2so $o S1,2so S1,2so Lons Term lnstallment Summary
S2,ooo st4,7so S2so S2so S2so Szso 52so S2o,oooFence Repair/Replacement (340 ft) s4.7s0 S2so S2so S2so S25o s2s0 S2o,oooShrub Replacement S2,ooo S4oo S3,ooo 52so S2so S2so S2so 52so S4,ooof ubular Fence repair/replacement S2so s2s0 s250 s2s0 s2s0 S3,oooIree & landscaoe imorovements (or replacements) ssoo S2,soo s25.000 s1.000 s1.000 S1.ooo S1.ooo S1.ooo s47.000fotals: S4,9oo City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Stonihs Fund Balance (as ol Aptil 2022)
Estimoted Reserye to finonce opprox. Jitst 6 months of 22-23 525,081.07
(S9,749.20)
mprov€mEnt 6sts
6eneral Maintenance Costs

1. scheduled'+

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. ldgalion
So.oo
So.oo
s2,OOO.0O
s2,7sO.OO
s!!!l!clgE!!5. Electdcal s3,650.0o
5s,7so.oo
curreht Year lmprovement Prol€cts

7. open spacefree wo*/Ladder fuel removal s28,OOO.OO
subtotat ofltem ? Srsn@s
subtotal
84c3!$L!e$!
s42,1sO.OO

8. Professional Serulces (Eneineer's Repod and lP)

9. Contract Seruices (all other contracts and services)

10. Publications/Mailings/communications
1X. staff

12. overhead

13. county Auditor Fee
STso.oo
So.oo

50.0o
so.oo
s823.OO
S181.72
Total lmprouemeht Costs
31,754.72
943,9o4.72
Assessment per Single Family Equivaleht
Slngle Famlly Equiv.lent Beneflt Units
s70.88
308
s21,831.O4
lndallment costs lsee in$allmeht Plah and summarv nen ba{e} Shot-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plan {previously €ollected)
shod-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Term Installment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstallm€nt coss
5o.oo
s56,OOO.OO
so.oo
so.oo
356,ooo.oo
giS4!!-EEElle
Total lmprovement CosE
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s21,831.04
1543,9O4.721
(s22,073.68)
S15,331.87
(s6,741.81)
(s56,OOO.OO)
So.oo
l$62.7 4L.aL)
Dlstrict Ealance {surplus is +; deficit is 0) (562,741,81) Net Assessment qt€ulatloh
sualus or Deficlt (surplus js subtractedj defi€it
's
added)
Net Assessment
s21,a31.9
-w-
s84572.85
sa4,s72.as
304
5274.s9
city of Folsom
Folsom Helghts bhdscaplng ahd Li8htlng Distrid
Fund 2o8
2022-23
Als$lsglelllEcEEEllls ry
Net tusessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
6mbarlsn of Net Asessment ahd A$essment
Allocated N.t Asesrment to Property
allocat€d A$€sshent to Property
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Deflclt (-)
(s274.59)
--$4c!-(S2o3.7r)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Page77
Folsom Heights - lnstallment Summary
District: Folsom Heiehts
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) $31,40s
Short Term lnstallment Summary
So Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo S2s,oooLadder fuel work ssoo s500 s500 ss00 Ssoo s2s.000Totals: ssoo 5o $soo
Long Term lnstallment Summary
SOSo $o $o So $o $o $oTotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SclGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

startins Fund Balance (os oJ Aptil 2022)
Estinoted Resetue to finance opprox. li6t 6 months of 22-23 s265,432.27
(s27,850.45)
Clty of Folsom
Folsom Heights No. 2 bndscaping and LightinB Distrid
Fund 281
2022-21
losEvcEe4lgEE
General Maint€nanc€ Costs

2. Unscheduled

3. streetlishts
s16,275.0O
SlO,OOO.OO
so.oo
sgryisele$!

4. Electdcal So.oo
So.oo
gse!!-YeedEEsE4edllelellr

6. Tree pruning/tadder fuel removal s37,OOO.oO
subtotdl oJ ltem 6 s37,m.@
963,27s.o0
lncid€ntel Costs

7. Professional Seruices (Ehginee/s Repod and lP)
a. contract seruices (all other contracts and seruices)

9. Publications/Mailings/Communications
10- Staff

11. Overhead

12. County Auditor Fee
STso.oo
So.oo
So.oo
S5,1oo.oo
s1,102.OO
So.oo
Total lmprovement tu*s
s5,m
$?qm;
Assessment to Prooedv {Curr€ntl
Assessment per Single Family Equivalent
slngle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total A$essment
s208.38
299.39
962,385.a9
lnstallment coss lsee In*allment Plah and Summarv neft paqe) short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
lons-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shod'T€rm lnstallment Plan {collected this year)
long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstallment costs
So.oo
So.oo
so.oo
so.oo
so.@
Dlstrld aalance
Total Assessmeht
Total lmprovement costs
subtdtal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contrib0tions from other sources
Net Balan.e
s62,386.89
1s7o,227 ,OOl
(s7,84o.XX)
5237,s7!.a2
5229,731.71
9o.oo
So.oo
s229,73t.7r
District aalance lsurplus is +; dettclt is {)) s229,73L.7a {€t Assessment Glculatlon
Sumlus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) Net AssEssm€nt
s52,3a5.a9
1s229.73L.7Ll
(s157,34.82)
(s167,34.82)
299
(Sss8.ss)
Allocated Nel Assesment ro Properiv
Net ksessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Ner As(essment to Property
&mparison of Net A$esrhent and assessment
Allocared Net Assessmeht to Prop€rty
Allocat€d Asre$ment lo Propedy
Per Parc€l surFlus {+) or Detlclt (-)
ss5a.9s
-$43!-
s767.3t
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Folsom Heights No. 2 - lnstallment Summary
District: Folsom Heights No.2
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
S290.736Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
s2s0 S2so S25o S8.ooovear 3 oruning S2so so S2so s2so
S2so Szso S2so s2s0 S8,ooovear 4 orunins s2s0 so S2so
S2so S25o s2s0 s2s0 S2so S8,ooovear 5 orunins $zso $o
s2s0 s2s0 S2so S2so S2so s2,000fence work S2so So
So s2s0 S2so S2so Szso S2so S3,oooTree care in open space s2so S1.250 So s1,2s0 s1,2s0 S1,2so Sr,2so S1,2so S29,oooTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
So s0 s0 s0 s0Glenn wall reoair so
So So So SoIree and landscaoe imprv (Vierra Cir) so So
s0 So SO s0 So SoNew landscape (Glenn)
So So So $o So So SOfotals: $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
SGlConsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

startins FDnd Balance (as oJ Aptil 2022)
Estimoted Reserye to Jinonce opprox. Jitst 6 months oJ 22-23 (Ss,s71.oo)
(59,O0s.34)
City of Folsom
Hannaford cross tandscaping and liShtint Distrld
Fund 212
2022-23
morov€ment @ds
General Malntenance Co$s

1. scheduled

2. Unsch€duled
3- Streetliehts

4. lrdgation
s16,961.76
s2,5OO.OO
s1,25O.OO
S65o.oo
Sgvjsslgsls
s. Electdcal s2,5OO.OO
s2,5OO.OO
Current Year lmprovem€nt Proie.ls

7. No Planned Projects 50.oo
Subtotol oJ ltem a so.@ _
926,361.76
lh.ldenral cods
L Professional seruices (Ensineer's Repod and lP)

9. contmct seruices (all other contracts and services)

10. Publicalions/Mailings/communications

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. county Audltor Fee
57so.oo
5o.oo
So.oo
s3,776.00
S743.oo
560.77
subtotal 5s329.a7
s31,691,53Total lmprovement &*s
Asiessment to Prooertv lcurrentl
Assessment per Singl€ Family Iquivalent
sinale Family Equivalent aenefit units
Total As$ment
s19s-7a
103
S20,165.34
lnstallment co$s lsee installmeni Plan and Summarv net pare) Shod'Term lnsrallment Plan {previously collected)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plah (previously collected)
shofr-Ierm lnstallment Plan (€ollected this Year)
Lons-Term lnstallment Plan lcollected this year)
Total ln.tallm€nt cods
s3s,ooo.oo
9o.oo
S7,ooo.oo
s0.o0
s42,OOO.OO
olstrlct Balanc€
Total Asse5sment
Total lmprovement Cosc
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Cont.ibutions from other sources
Net Balance
s20,16s.34
{s31,591.s3)
{s11,526.19)
{S12,416.34)
(s23,942.s3)
(S42,ooo.oo)
so.oo
(s6s,942,s3)
Dlstrlct Balance (surplu3 ls +; deficlt is ()) {S6s,e42.s3) !€t Aselsment Glcutatlon
s20,165.34
Surplls or Deficit (su.plus is subtracted; delicit i5 added) -tg!:-
s85,107.a7
Alloc?ted Net A$essment to Ptopertv
Net Assessment
sinEle Famlly Equivalent Beneflt Unlts
Allocated Net Asessment to Property
$8O1O7.87
10!
3836.oo
comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Allocated Assessmeht to Property
P€r Parcel Surplus (+) or Deflclt (-)
{s835.0o}
s19s.78
(s640.22)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Hannaford Cross - lnstallment Summary
District: Hannaford Cross
2022-23Fiscal Year:

Fund Balance (2022) (Ss,s71)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
S1.ooo s1.000 s2s,000S1,ooo So s1,ooo s1,000 s1,000Lakeside fense repair SO S2so Szso Szso s2so s2so ss,ooovear 2 pruning s2so
S2so S25o S2so s2s0 Szso Ss,ooovear 3 orunine s2s0 5o
Ss.ooo Ss,ooo s50,000Ss,ooo 5o Ss,ooo ss,ooo ss,ooovear 4 pruning SO S2so Szso S2so s2so Szso ss,ooovear 5 pruning s2so
S2so s2s0 S2so s2s0 Szso S3,sooReoairs at suardshack s2so So S93.sooSo S7,ooo $7,ooo $7,ooo S7,ooo $7,000Totals: s7,ooo Long Term lnstallment Summary
SO5o $o $o So $o SoTotals: so
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

storting Fund Balonce (as ol April 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to Jinonce opptox. litst 6 months of22-23 s1O1,21a.OO
1s9,264.0O)
CitY oI Folsom
lake Natoma Shores Landscaping and U8htlhg Distrld
Fund 213
2022-23
G€neral Maihtenance costs

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. lrrigation
517,87.A4
ss,ooo.oo
s75O.OO
51,000.00
Ssvicele$!
s. Electrical SToo.oo
s3,OO0.OO
Current Y€ar lmorovement Proiects

7. LED conversion/rree work $8.ooo.oo
subtotol ol ttem 7 9a,m.m _
s35,087.84Subtotal
a. Professional Seruices (Ensineer's Repod and lP)

9. contract Setuices {all other contracts and seNices)

10. Publications/MailinAs/Communications
X1. staff
X2. overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
s750.OO
So.oo
so.oo
s2,86O.OO
s943.OO
s65.57
subtotal 54,ffi
54o,7o7.5aTotal lmprovement costs
Assessment to Probertv (currentl
Assessment per SinAle Family Equivalent
Sinsle Famlly Equivalent Eenefit Untrs
Total Ass€ssmeht
s183.s8
113 _
52o,74.s4
shofr-Term lnstaliment Plan (previously collectedl
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shod-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (colle.ted this year)
Total lnstallment costs
ss,ooo.o0
S2a,107.oo
S1,[email protected]
S1,2so.oo
S3s,357.o0
Dlialat Ealance
Total lmprovement costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions from other sources
Net Balance
52o,744.s4
(S40,707.s1)
(S19,962.s7)
s91,954.00
S71,991.03
(S3s,357.00)
So.oo
S36,634.o3
oiirlct aalance (surplus is +; deficit is 0) S36,634.03 Net Assessmenl &lculation
s20,74.54
Surplus or Deficit (surplus is !ubtccted; defacit is added) (s35,534.03) ($1s,889.49)
allocated Net As*ssment to Probenv
(s1s,E89.49)
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units 113
{s140.61)Allocated Net Assessment to PropeE
comoarisoh ol Net Assesmeht and Assessment
allocated Net Assessment to Property
Allocated Assessment to PtoP€frY
Per Parcel surplus {+) o' Deficit G}
$14O,61
-99:L
s324.19
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Lake Natoma Shores - Installment Summary
District: Lake Natoma Shores
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
s101.218Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Szso Szso Szso s2so S2so s2so ss,o0oLED landscape lights S2so s2s0 s2s0 S2so S2so ss,000vear 3 pruninq s2so
Ss.oooS2so $zso Szso 52so $zso S2sovear 4 pruning
s2s0 s2s0 s2s0 S2so 52so ss,000vear 5 oruninq s2so
So S1.ooo S1.ooo s1.000 S1.ooo S1.ooo s20.000Totals: Sl,ooo Long Term lnstallment Summary
Sls.ooos1,000 S14.607 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo SsooSignage Repair/Replacement s2.7s0 S2so S25o s2s0 s2s0 S2so S22,oooTurf repair/irrisation upqrades S1,ooo S1,ooo s4,s00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo ssoo SlG,oooTree & landscape improvements (or replacements) Ss3.oooS3.ooo S21,8s7 51,2s0 S1,2so S1,2so Sr,2so $1,2s0Iotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
city of Folsom
Los Cerros Landscaping and Lighting District
Fund 204
2022-23
q5sessment to Prooertv lCu(entl
Assessment per Single Family Equivaleht
single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total Assessment
S121.18
S40,837.66
Net Assesiment Calculation
Assessment
surplus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit i5 added) Net Assessment
$40,837.55
{s7,833.04}
---3$"0-0a6-t
Allocated Net Assessmentto Plopenv
Net Assessmeht
single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
933,004.62
117
s97.94
S101,218.00
6 months of 22-23 ($18,237.09)Resewe toEstimdted
mDrovement Costs
General Malntenance Costs

1. scheduled 527,64r.7o

2. Uns.heduled

3. Streetlights
S7,soo.oo
$3,ooo.oo
Seryice Costs

4. Electrical

5. Water
S7,1so.oo
s4,750.00
Current Year lmorovement Proiects

6. Paint light poles/tree pruning
Subtotal
Subtotol oI ltem 6
$33,soo.oo
--*3"5o-olo
J8-3,s4-i3d-
lncidental Costs

7. Professional serui.es (EnEineer's Report and lP)
L Cohtract Seruices {all other contracts and services)

9. Publications/Mailings/communications

10. Staff

11. overhead

12. CountyAuditorFee
STso.oo
So.oo
So.oo
S4,69o.oo
S1,3os.oo
S198.83
Subtotal
Total lmprovement Costs
---Te6asr3
$90,48s.53
Short-Term lnstallment Plah (previously collected)
Long-Term lhstallment Plan {previously collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plah (collected this year)
Long-Term lnsiallmeht Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstallment Costs
$1G,2so.oo
Ss,ooo.oo
S3,2so.oo
S1,ooo.oo
s2s,500.00
District Balance
Total Assessment
Total lmprovemeht Costs
subtotal
Total Available Fuhds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
contributions from other souraes
Net Balance
540,837,G6
(s90,48s,s3)
(s4s,647.87)
S82.980.91
S33,333.04
(s2s,soo.oo)
So.oo
$7,833.04
District Balance (surplus is +; deticlt ii 0) S7,833.04 Comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Allocated Net Ass€ssment to Property
allocated Assessmentto Property
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Oelicit {-)
(se7.e4)
$121.18
------Tt5:t-
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Los Cerros - lnstallment Summary
District: Los Cerros
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Fund Balance {2022) S101,218
ss00 So ss00 Ssoo S5oo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,oooLadder fuel work ss00 So Ssoo Ssoo S5oo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,ooolree replacement ss00 So Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,oooyear 3 prunina
ss00 So Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,oooyear 4 pruning
ss00 So Ssoo S5oo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Slo,oooyear 5 pruning
s7s0 $o STso STso STso S75o s7s0 S27.3ooPaint street light poles s3.2s0 So $3.zso S3.2so S3.250 S3,2so s3.2s0 S77,30oIotals:

Lons Term lnstallment Summary
ss00 Ssoo ss00 ss00 ss00 S3o,ooolnstall flow Dackase and master valve $soo $o ss00 Ssoo ss00 ss00 Ssoo s3s,000Upgrade irrisation controllers Ssoo So s0 S1.ooo S1.ooo s1.000 s1,000 Sr,ooo s6s.000Totals: Sl,ooo City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

storting fund Balonce (as ol Aptil 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to Jinance apptox- ftrst 6 months ol 22-23 {s246,857.00)
(s77,693.ss)
City of Folsom
Natoma Statlon bndscaplng and Ughting District
Fund 2O7
2022-23
lmprovement Costs
ge!!El!&l$9!3!S!e$s

1. scheduled

3. Streetlights

4. lrirgation
S101,443.36
512,500.O0
s12,OOO.OO
517,sOO.OO
Seelc€ 6ss

5. Electrical sla,soo.oo
s45,OOO.OO
Curr€nt Year lmprov€meht Prolects

7. No planned prciects So.oo
so.@ _
S2o0,943.38
Subbtol of ltem 7
Subtotal
!!dCs!3l!e!!!
a. Professional Seruices {Engineer's Repon and lP)
L contract Seruices (all other contEcts and seruices)
1o. Publications/Mailinss/Communications

11. Staff

12. Ovetread

13. county Auditor Fee
s75O.OO
$o.oo
So.oo
s32,602.O0
s5,9OO.OO
91,119.37
Total lmprov€ment tusts
54qsffi
5247,3!4.73
A$essment to Propertv {Currentl
Assessment per singl€ Family Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Total Asse$ment
s91.70
La91.23
s173,976.36
lnstallment 6sts {see ln*allment Plan and Summa.v nen oaeel shon-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Lons-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shod'Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Lona-Term Installment Plan (collected this year)
Total lhstallm€nt 6sts
s40,000.o0
s240,0o0.o0
s8,OOO.OO
s48,OOO.OO
9i3E,oo0.m
)lstrict Balance
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Costs
subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s!73,976.36
1s247,314.73)
{s73,338.37)
{s243,O2O.ss)
{s315,3s8.92)
{$336,OOO.OO)
so.oo
(9552,3s8.92)
Disrrict Balance (surplus is +; deficit is 0) (S552,3s8.92) !€t Assessment Glculation
Surplus or Deficit (surplus is subtEct€dj deficit is added) N€t Assessment
s173,976.35
-t@93-s826,335.28
Allocated N€t Asse$ment to Prooenv
Net A<<essmeht
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
S826,33s.28
"-----------1!9Zs435-5S
Comparlson ot N€t A$essment and Assessneht
Allocared Net A$essment to Prop€rty
Allocat€d As€ssment io Propedv
Pcr Parcel Surplus (+) or oetlclt {-)
(S43s.ss)
$91.70
($343,85)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Natoma Station - lnstallment Summary
District: Natoma Station
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) (s245,8s7)
5hort Term lnstallment Summary
Approx,
Pro.iect Yearlv Prior Years Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total lnstallment Collections 2018 2019 2920 2021- 2022 Reouired Ladder fule work S1,ooo so S1,ooo S1.ooo S1.ooo S1.ooo S1,ooo Slo,ooo Lieht pole replacement S1,ooo So S1,ooo 51,ooo 51,000 S1,ooo 51,000 S25,ooo Shrub & tree replacement and concrete work on turnpike S1,ooo 5o S1,ooo s1,000 S1,ooo $1,ooo S1,ooo S4o,ooo Iron Point Rd shrub & tree replacement S1,ooo so S1,ooo s1,000 S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo 54o,ooo Bigfood mini park tree replacement S1,ooo so s1,ooo 51,ooo S1,ooo S1.ooo s1,000 Slo,ooo Tree replacement/wall damage on back diamond S1,ooo So S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo s1,ooo s1,ooo Slo.ooo Shrub/Tree replacement on Blue Ravine s1,ooo So S1.ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S 1,ooo s4o,ooo year 1 tree pruning 51,000 5o 51,000 S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S25,ooo Totals: s8.000 So s8,000 S8,ooo S8,ooo S8,ooo s8,ooo s200.000 Lone Term lnstallment Summarv
ADorox.

Proiect Yearlv Prior Years Year 1 Years 2-5 Years 5-10 Years 10:20 Years 20-30 Total lnstallment Collections 20!a 2079-2022 2022-2027 2027-2037 2037-2047 Required Tree & landscape improvements (or replacements) s10.000 So Slo,ooo Slo,ooo 510,000 51o,ooo Slo,ooo s 160.000 Wetland area improvement S1,ooo So S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo s3o,ooo Wall Repair/Paintine (7800 feet) s10,0oo 5o 510,000 s1"0.000 Slo.ooo s10.000 s10,000 S234,ooo Mini Park-replantine/bark (2 parks at 1/2 acre) Ss,ooo So Ss,ooo ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss,ooo ss.000 s60,000 Road Paver replacement s1.000 So S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo s40.000 Sienaee Reoair Replacement S1,ooo So S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo 51,ooo 51,ooo S23,ooo Sidewalk reoair Ss,ooo So ss.000 Ss.ooo ss,000 S5,ooo Ss,ooo S8o,ooo lrrisation upgrades Ss,ooo 5o Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss,ooo 5s,ooo Ss,ooo ss6.000 Art repair Slo.ooo 5o s10,000 Slo,ooo Slo,ooo Slo,ooo $1o,ooo s100.000 Totals: S48,ooo So s48.000 s48.000 S48.ooo s48.000 s48.000 s783.000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
i:l f-l I Gonsu lti n g G ro u p

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

CitY ol Folsom
Ndoma Valley l.ndsepina and Lighting Disvid
Fund 232
2022-2t
General Maihtenan.e Co*s

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled
3- StreetliShts

4. lrriEation
s39,856-36
s1,OOO.O0
s37s.OO
s1,OOO.OO
servle Co<ts

6. Electrical s1,5OO.OO
S3,7so.oo
Curreni Year lhprov€ment Proieds

7. No planned prcjects so.oo
subtotal oJ ltem a so.oo
s47,4a!36
a.
9-

10. 11.
12,

13. Professional servi€es (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services {all other contra€ts and services)
Publ ications/Mai lings/communications
staff
county Auditor Fee
sTso.oo
so.0o
so.oo
s7,436.OO
S1,587.00
S46.61
$tffi
Total lmprovemeni cosis s57,4oo-9?
Asessmeht per Single Fa mily Equivalent
Slnale Familv Equivalent Benefit Units
s8s6.37
79 s57,553.23
lhstallmeht costr ls€E installhent Plan and summarv ne{ o.Ee} shortTirm lnstallment Pla n {previously col lected)
bna-Term lnstallment Pla n (prEviouslY coll ected)
short-Term lnstallment Plan {col lected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected rhls year)
Total ln.tallment cosls
ss,ooo.oo
$2o,ooo.oo
s1,OOO.OO
s5,OOO.OO
s31,OOO.OO
Dl$dc-Eal@
Totai ssessment
Total lmprovement cosB
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s67,653.23
{Ss7,4o0.97)
slo,252.26
s2OA,7 46.7 4
521a,999.00
{s31,OOO.OO)
so.oo
S187,999.00
Distrid aabnce lsurpius is i detidt is l)) s1a7,999.O0
Nel3'Ismdcdqlrli@
tusessment s67,6s3.23
surplus or Deficit (surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) -__-lll.ez.rrl.qqt($120,345.77) alcErr!3st3rrrlr@ilef]@$
Net Asessment
Si nale Family Equivalent B€nefit Unib
Al located N€t &sessment to Properv
612O.34s-7r)
79 rs1.523.36t
31,523.36
@
Allo6ted Net Assessment to ProP€rly
Per Parel surplus (+l or Delidt (-)
*Funds from fund balance
________l!50,L
92,379.73
stadtns Fund Balance (os oJApil 2o22)
Estimated ReseNe to Jinan@ approx. litst 6 months of 22 23 s238,9s9.0O
(s30,212.26)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Natoma Valley - lnstallment Summary
Natoma VallevDistrict:

Fiscal Year: 2022-2?
S238,9s9Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
S2so S2so ss,s00S2so So s2so Szso s2soyear 3 pruning
s2s0 Szso Szso s2so s2so Ss,soovear 4 orunins s2so $o
S2so S2so Ss,soos2s0 So s2so s2so s2soyear 5 pruning
S2so S2so S2so Szso s2so ss,soolnterior landscape imorovements s2so So s1.000 s1,000 S1,ooo s1,000 S1,ooo $22,oooTotals: S1,ooo $o Lone Term lnstallment Summary
s50,000SO ss,000 ss,000 Ss,ooo ss,000 Ss,oooWall Reoair/Replacement Ss,ooo Sso.ooos0 Ss.ooo ss.000 5o ss,000 Ss,oooTotals: Ss,ooo
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

starting Fund Boldnce (os oJ Aptil 2022)
Estimoted BeseNe to Jinonce opptox. Jirst 6 months ol 22-23 s23,213.00
{s14,022.801
Clty ot folsom
Prosped Ridge bhdscaplhg and tighting District
Fund 285
2022-23
lmprovement Co$s
General Malntenance coss

1. scheduled

2. Unschedul€d

3. StreetliAhts

4. Vtigation
sL4,659.94
s8,3OO.OO
ssoo.oo
s600.OO
Sedice 6sts

5. Electrical s375.OO
s2,5OO.OO
Current Year lmprovement Proiects

7. No Planned Prolects So.oo
subtotal oJ ltem 6 $*
Subrolal s26p4.94
E!iCe!!3!ee$!

8. Prolessiohal Seruices (Ensaneer's Report and lPl

9. contract Seruices (all other contracts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailings/communications
U- staff
12- Overhead
X3. countyAuditorFee
subrotal
s75O.OO
So.oo
So.oo
55,219.00
s219.OO
s2O.6s
s6,2Oa.5s
Total lmprov€hent @ds s33,153.s9
Assessment per Sinale Famlly Equivalent
Slngle Family Equlvalent Beneflt Unib
Total Assessm€nt
s1,173.86

26.75 s31,4m.75
Shod-Term lnstallment PIan (previously collected)
Lona-Term lnstallment Plan {previously collected)
shod-Term lnstallment Plan (collected rhis Year)
Lona-Term lnstallment Plan (colle.ted this year)
Total lhnallment costs
So.oo
So.oo
$o.oo
So.oo
so.oo
DiSrlct Balahce
Total Assessment
Total hprovement costs
Subtotal
s31,400.75
{s33,1s3-s9)
lsa,7s2.a4)
Total lnstallment cost
contributions from other sources
Net galance
s9,190.20
s7,437.36
So.oo
So.oo
57,437.36
Di3trict aalance {surplus ls +; deficit is (}) s7,437.35 Net Ass€ssment Glculation
Surplus or Deficit (surplus i3 subtEcted; d€ficit is added) Net Assessment
s31,400,76
ts7,437.35)
923,953.39
Allocai€d Net Asse$ment to Prob€rtv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equivalent Behefit UniB
Allocated Net Assessment to Propedy
s23,953.39
2a
S89s.83
Comparlson ol Net Assessmeht and Assessment
Allocated N€t Ass€ssmehr to Property
Allocated A$e5sm€nt to ProPedY
P€r Parcel Surplus (+) or Delicit G)
(SEss.83)
_$,1?3.88
s278.O3
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Prospect Ridge - lnstallment Summary
District: Prospect Ridse
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance {2022) S23,213
Short Term lnstallment Summary
year 1 pruning
year 2 pruning
year 3 pruning
vear 4 pruning
vear 5 pruning
s0 So So $o $o so$o $oTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
So s0 So so $oSo $o $oIotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23

startinq Fund Balance (os oJ Apttl 2022)
Estimated Reserue tolinonce apptox. litst 6 months ot22'23 (5458,a29.72)
{sa7,630.83)
Clty of Folsom
Prairle Oaks Ranch bndscaplng and LiShting District
Fuhd 236
2022-23
!ggqve!9dls!!!
ceheral Maintenan.e Cogts
X. scheduled

2. Unschedul€d

3. StreetlighB

4. lrigation-Pafrs
so.@
So.oo
SlO,OOO.OO
so.oo
S€rvlc€ @ds

5. Electdcal $10,o00.oo
SEo,ooo.oo
current Year lmprovement Prolects
7- No pianned prciects so.oo
Subtotol of kem 7 Sm
subtotal s80,[email protected]
lh.ldental costs
a. Professional s€ruices (Engineer's Repod and lP)

9. Contract S€tuices {all other contracts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailings/Communi€ations
1X. Staff

12. Overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
sTso.oo
So.oo
so.oo
ss9,484.00
S6,818.00
ss41.99
subtotal s67,s93.99
Total lmprov€ment costs s147,593,99
Assessment to Prooedv lcurreht)
Assessmeht per single Family Equlvalent
Singl€ Family Equivalent Benefit Units
$213.51
918.63
s195,228.s5
lnnallment costs (se insallmeni Plan and Summarv net bare) shod-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Lon8-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shon-Term lnstallment Plan (.ollected this year)
Lons-lem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstallment @sts
s117,2O0.00
S97,711.00
so.oo
So.oo
$214,91r.o0
Dlstrlct Ealance
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement costs
subtob I
Total Available Fundg
Total Funds
Total lnstallrent cost
Contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s195,22a.55
1s147,593-99)
s48,634-56
(ss46,460.s5)
{$497,82s.99)
(S214,91x.0o)
so.oo
157L2,736.991
Dl$rict Balance (surpl!s is +; deficlt Is 0) (s712,735.99) $195,22E.55
Surplus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) _,-s74l3SB s908,95s.55
Allocated Net Asssment to Propedv
Net Assessment
Single Famlly Equivalent Benefit units
Allocated Net assessment to Property
S9o8,s65.55
-
3989.48
Comparibn of Net Assessm€nt and A$essment
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
Allocated Assessm€nt to ProPertv
Per Parcel surplus {+) or Deticit G)
{Se89.48)
-c491-
ls775.a7l
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Prairie Oaks Ranch - lnstallment Summary
Prairie Oaks RanchDisrict:

Fiscal Year: 2022-29
Fund Balance (2022! (s4s1,s38)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
5o $oSo SO 5o So $oTotals: So
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
So $o $oSo $o So $oTotals: $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGrouP

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Statting Fund Bolonce (as oJApril2022)
Estimoted Resetve to finance opprox. Jitst 6 months oJ 22'23 Available Frnds
S159,il7.18
1sx28,777.661
clty of Folsom
Pralile Oaks Ranch No.2 Landscaplngand Llghtlng Dlsttld Fund 215
2022-23
!4!IqE!!e!!19!E
Gene6l Maint€nance Costs

1. scheduled

2. Uns€heduled

3. streetljghb

4. kriSatlon-Pafrs
91l3,mo.oo
s20,000.00
5o.oo
s2o,ooo.oo
Service Costs

5. flecrical So.oo
$o.oo
Curr€nt Vear lmprovement Prol€ds

7. Grover Entryat lron Point Slm,ooo.oo
Subtoial
ncideilal Costs
Sr?sp()m
8 Professional Senices {Engineer's Repofr and IPJ
9 Contact Seruices (all othe.contracts and seruices)
10 Poblications/Mailings/communications
11 Staff
12 overhead
13 CountyAuditor F€€
57so.oo
So.oo
So.oo
So.oo
ss,2o0.oo
So.oo
subtotal ss,9s0.00
srsqMTotal lmprovement Costs
Assessment per single Family Equivalent
Single Family Equivalent aenefit Units
$313.91
918.63
Srs8p6ru
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleded)
LonS Term lnstallmentPlan (previouslycollectedl
Shod-Term lnstallm€nt Plan (colleded this yeat)
Long-T€rm ln*allment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstallment&!ts
5o.oo
So.oo
so.0o
So.oo
So.oo
)lstrict Balance
Total lmprovement costs
Subtotal
TotalAvailable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
Contributions froh other sources
Net Ealanc€
s2aa,361.14
(S280,9so.oo)
51,417.14
s30,869.s2
s38,286.67
So.oo
So.oo
s38,286.67
Dlstilct Balance {surplus ls+; detlclt ls (}l $38"rffi? {€t Asse$ment Calculatlon
s288,367.14
surplus or Deficitlsurplus is subtract€d; deficit is addedl (s38,285.57) S250,080.8
Allodt€d Net Assessment to Ptoo€rtv
9250,080.48
s272,23
Single Family Equivalent Senefit Units
Allocat€d Net Asessment to Property
com..dson ol Net &rEssment and Assessm€nt
Allorated NGt Aressm€ntto P.openy
Allo.ated tusesshent to Prop€dy
P€r Par.el Surplus (+) or Deficlt Gl
15272.2?l
$41.68
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 - lnstallment Summary
Disilict Piairie Oaks Ranch No,2
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) irss,647
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Aoorox.

Proiect Yearly Prior Years Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total lnstallment Collections 2018 2019 2020 2027 2022 Required vear 1 pruning s1,000 So S1,ooo 51,ooo S1,ooo s 1,000 s1,000 s2s,000 vear 2 pruning 51,ooo So S 1,ooo S1.ooo S1,ooo 51,ooo S1,ooo 52s,ooo vear 3 pruning S1,ooo So 51,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S2s,ooo vear 4 pruning S1,ooo So s1,000 S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo s1,000 s2s.000 vear 5 orunine S1,ooo So S1,ooo Si.,ooo S1,ooo s1,000 S1.ooo S2s,ooo free replacment (replace empty areas) S 1,ooo so s1.000 S1,ooo S1,ooo S 1,ooo S1,ooo Sls,ooo LED landscape liehts S1,ooo So Sr,ooo 51,ooo S1.ooo s1.000 S1,ooo S2s,ooo Landscaoe reolacement S1,ooo So S1.ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S 1,ooo S1,ooo s25.000 Fence replacement S1,ooo So $1,ooo S1,ooo s1.000 91.ooo S1,ooo s20,000 Ladder fuel Sr,ooo So S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo Sr,ooo STs.ooo Repair damage walls (stucco half walls) Ssoo $o ss00 ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo S8,ooo Totals: Slo,soo so Slo,soo s10.500 S1o.5oo Slo.soo Slo,soo s293,000 Long Term lnstallment Summary
Aoprox.

Proiect Yearly Prior Years Year 1 Years 2-5 Years 5-10 Years 10-20 Years 20-30 Total lnstallment Collections 20t8 2019-2022 2022-2027 2027-2037 2037-2047 Required Landscape reDlacement on Blue Ravine s10,000 5o Slo,ooo Slo,ooo slo,ooo Slo.ooo s10,000 s2s0,000 Landscape Replacement on Riley Slo,ooo So s10.000 s10,000 s10,000 Slo,ooo Slo,ooo S2so,ooo Landscape Replacement on Prairie City Slo.ooo So Slo,ooo Slo,ooo Slo,ooo s10,000 Slo,ooo S15o,ooo Landscape replacment on lron Point 510,000 so Slo,ooo s10,000 Slo,ooo Slo,ooo s 1o,ooo s100.000 Fence replacement Slo,ooo 5o Slo,ooo slo,ooo Slo.ooo s10.000 s10,000 s100,000 Post and cable replacement ss,ooo So Ss,ooo Ss.ooo Ss,ooo Ss,ooo Ss,ooo s75.000 Repair damaged walls S1,ooo So S1,ooo S1.ooo S1.ooo S1,ooo S1,ooo S4o,ooo fotals: ss6,000 So SsG.ooo s55.000 SsG.ooo SsG.ooo ss5,000 s96s,000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$t)lConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Sturtinq Fund Balahce (6ofAptil 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe b Jinon.e opptox.fitst 6 months of22-23 s67,680.OO
ls4,o14-2Al
CltY of Folsom
The Residen.e! At ARC (Oak Ave) Landscapint and ttAhtina Oistrid Fund 271
,o2a-a!
lmproveh€nt Cois
9c!€ELMEidE!3$s!9$r

3. st.eetliSht
4, ldgation Pans
s14,gos.06
s3,O0O.OO
sTso.oo
s1,200.@
SssllElg$c

5. Elect.ical 57O0.O0
s3,3Oo.m
Orrcnt Year lmprovement Proi6cts

7. Landscapereplacement s2,O0O.OO
subtorololkema sru
$r5"sffisubtotal
lncidental&ns

8. Professional SeNices (Ensinee/s Report and lP)

9. Contra.t SeNices {all oth€r contracts and seNlces)
10- Publications/Mailings/communications
11- Staff

12. overhead

13. county Auditor Fee
9375.oo
so.m
$0.00
54,O12.@
591s.0o
$10.03
$5,312,03
Total hprovement Costs s31,157,09
a*ssment ro Propedv l@rrentl
Assessment per Singl€ Family Equivalent
Slngle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Ros 1 - Assesment
ss35.67
17 s9,123.39
s9,123.39
ln*allment ests lsee insallment Pl.n and summarv nef oarel Shod Term lnstallment Plan (previouslv coll€cted)
lons-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colle.ted)
short'Term lnstallrent Plan (colle.ted this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total tdstallment Costs
s4,s0o.oo
so.oo
ssm.oo

90.oo
s5,OOO.O0
St$4!-gd!r
Total Asessment
Total lmprovement CosB
s9,123.39
(s31,157.09)
$22,O43.7O1
Total lnstallment cost
contributions from other sources
$63,505-72
54a,562.O2
{ss,o0o.@)
so.m
s36,552.02
oldrlct Balanc. {surpl{s is +; dellclt ls l)) $36,S62.O2 !€!-Algrellldscbtis
surolus or Deficit (surplus is suhracted; deficlt is added) Net &sessment
s9,123.39
{s35,562.o2)
(s27,8a-63)
(527,438.631
4 (s1,614.041
Allocated Net A$€sment to Prooen!
The Resldences at ARc I
NetAsses5ment
Singl€ Family Equivalent Benefit units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
tumDarlson ot Net A$essment and Ase$m€nl
Th€ R6ldences at ARC I
Allocated Assessment to Property
Pcr Parcel surplur {+) or Defi.lt G}
s1,614.@
ss36.67
s2,L5O.7t
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The Residences at ARC - lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARCDistrict:

Fiscal Year: 2022-23
s67,680Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC
s4.500Ssoo S2.ooo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo ssoo ssooLandscape replacement Ssoo S4,sooss00 s2.000 Ssoo Ssoo sso0 $sooTotals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC
5o$o SO So $o So so $oTotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClconsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

sbrtlns Fund Bolonce (os otAptil 20221
Estimoted Reseve tofindnce opptot. li6t 6 months oJ 22 23 s67,680.00
(95,224.80)
CltY ofFolsom
fre Residen.e3 Al ARc ll lfolsom-Auburn Blvd) LandscaPina and tishtang Distrid Fund 271
2022-23
mprovement 6*s
General Maintenance costs

3. Streetlights

4. trrigation Pats
s14,905-06
s3,00o.oo
sTso.oo
S1,2oo.oo
Servl.c Cods
s. Electdcal $7oo.oo
s3,3O0.00
turr€nt Year lmorovcm€ht Prole.ts

7. Landscapereplacem€nt 92,OOO.00
s2,m.@ _
s29,a5S.06
hcld€nral &is
8- Professional Seruices {Enginee/s Repod and lP)

9. contract seryices {all other.ontracts and seNices)
lo. Pdblications/Mailings/communi.atons
11- Staff

12. Ovefread

13. Counry Audltor Fee
5375.OO
so.0o
So.oo
94,012.00
591s.00
s5.90
ss.3oru
Total lmprov€ment cons S31,162.96
trs.!rment t6 Probertv {Curreni)
Assessment per single Family Equivalent
Single Famlly Equivalent Beneflt Unlts
Re.2 - A<e$ment
s1,169 97
10 511,699.70
s11,699.70
n*allment co5r5 (s€e lnstallment Plan and Summarv nen p.!el Shon^Term lnstallm€nt Plan (previously collected)
tons-Iem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shod-Term hstallment Plan (colle.ted this yeat
tong-Term lnstallment Plan {collected this yeat
Tot.l lnstallment @sts
s4,5OO.OO
so.oo
ss0o.oo
So.oo
ss,ooo.oo
Dlstrl.t BalEn.e
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Cosb
Total available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s11,699.70
(s31,162.96)
1s19,463-26)
s62,455.2O
942,991.94
(ss,o00.oo)
So.oo
s37,991-94
oistricr Balan.€ {sqrplu. is +; deficit is 0) s37,991.94 NetAsiesment calculatlon
su@lus o. Deficit (surplus is subtracted; defi.it i5 added) N€tAsessment
s1L599.70
1s37,991.941
lsz6,zez.24l
(s26,212.24)
---J(92,629-22)
Allocated Net Asse6smenl to Propertv
The Resld€nc€s at aRc il
Net Assessment
5ln8le Family Equivalent aenefit Units
Allocated Net assessmentto Propery
&mbarlsoh of N€t A$€ssment ahd Assessment
The Residehces at ARC ll
Allo.ated Net Ars€ssment to Propedy
Allocat€d Assessment to ProPerty
P€i Parcel surplus (+) or Detl(lt C)
s2,629.22
___lLi!9!i
s3,799.19
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

The Residences at ARC ll - lnstallment Summary
District: The Residences at ARC ll
2022-23Fiscal Year:
s67,680Fund Balance (2022)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARCII
s4,s00Ssoo s2,000 ss00 ssoo ss00 ss00 ssooLandscape replacement S4.sooss00 s2.000 Ssoo $s00 ssoo Ssoo ssooTotals:

Lone Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC ll
SO $o So $o $o So $oTotals: So
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGone ultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

stortinE Fund Bolonce (ds ol Aptil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe toJinonce dpptox. JiEt 6 months oJ22'23 s102,449.00
So.oo
Clty of Folsom
Sllveibrook tandscapinB and Lighting oistrid
fund 237
2022-23
lEp@e!!le$!
6eneral Maint€nance co*s

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled*

3. streetlights*

4. lrlgstion Patu
s6,3a0.44
S1,soo.o0
s1,2OO.OO
slso.oo
Servlc€ Co$s

5. Electrical* ssoo.oo
ssoo.oo
Current Y€ar lmprovem€nt Proi€cB

6. No planned prcjects So.oo
so@ _
91q230.4Subtotal
hgcg4ercesE

7. Professional Seruices {Engin€er's Repod and lP)
a. contm.tSeNices (all orh€r contmcts and seryices)*

9. Publications/Mailinss/Communications

10. Staff

11. Overhead

12. County Auditor Fee
sTso.oo
So.oo
s100.OO
s1,144.0O
s447.OO
s67.!7
subtotal
Total lmprov€ment co*s
s2,s08.17
s12,73a.51
Asresrmehi to Probertv (Currentl
Assessment per Single Family Equivalent
Single Family Equlvalent Senefit UniB
so.o0
113 a4
So.oo
lr*allmenr Plan G*s {s* indallment Plan and Sunmarv ne* oarel shod-Term lnstallment Plan {previously.ollected)
tons Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shod-Term lnstallment Plan lcollected this yea.)
LonA-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total ln*allment 6*s
s2,5OO.0O
982,000.o0
s5OO.OO
Ss,ooo.oo
sgo,ooo.m
Total Assessment to property
Total lmprovement costs
s!btotal
So.oo
{S12,738.61)
(s12,738.61)
Total lnstallmeht Costs
contdbutions from other sources
S102,449.oo
$a9,710.39
(s90,ooo.o0)
so.oo
(s289.51)
Di*rlct a.lance (surplus ls +; delicir is 0) (s28e.61)
!et Assiment Glculation
So.@
sunlus or Deficit (surplus is subtractedj deficit is added) -e49r-
$289.51
Allocated N€t Asressment to P.obertv
Net &sessment
Slnale Familv Equlvalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessm€nt to Property
S269.61
Sz.s4
&mparlson of N€t Assessment and Asse$ment
Allocated Net A$essment to Property
Allocated Assessment to Propedy
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Defl.lt {-)
l52.s4)
--t999-
{S2's4)
ar.€nrnated.on! bar€don pnorw.r!
Assessments will not be levied for 2022-23
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Silverbrook - lnstallment Summary
SilverbrookDistrict:

Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) sro2,449
Short Term lnstallment Summary
ss00 Ssoo Ssoo S7.sooSsoo So ss00 sso0Tree replacement
ss00 s7.s00Ssoo $o ssoo ss00 sso0 ssooTotals:

Lons Term lnstallment Summary
ss,000 ss,000 ss,000 ss,000 ss,000 s1s0,000Median Relandscapinq Ss,ooo ss7,000 ss.000 ss.000 ss.000 ss.000 ss,000 s1s0,000Totals Ss,ooo ssT,ooo City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Estimoted Resetue to Iinance dpprox. Jirst 6 months oJ 22-2s s83,778.0O
{510,844.06)
CitV ot Folsom
Sieeplechase bhdscaplng and Llghting District
Fund 251
2022-23
lmorovement &sts
General Malntenance Cois

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. lrdgation Pans
514,300.2A
s7,soo.oo
s1,25O.OO
560o.oo
Seryllsls$E
s2,1OO.OO
S3,75o.oo
Current Year lmprovement Proiects

7. Fence replacementfree work SlO,OOO.OO
Subtoto! oJ ttem 7 Src""""-
Subtotal s39,500.28
lncldental cods
8, Professional services (Ensineer's Report and lP)

9. Contract seruices (all other contracts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailings/communications

11. Staff

12. oveAead
97so.oo
So.oo
so.oo
$4,O19.00
s841.OO
s883.OO13. County Auditor Fee
Subtotal
T6tal lmprov€m€nt &*s
s5,493.0O
$4s,993.2a
{ssessment to Prooertv lcutrent)
Assessment per single Family Equivalent
Single Family Equlvalent Benefit Units
Total Ases.ment
sxs7.58
x54
s24,2a2-72
n*allment Coss lsee lnsallment Plan and s!mmarv nen oaqel Short-Term lnstallment Plan {pr€vaously collected}
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shofr-Term lnstallment PIan (collected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (coll€cted this year)
Total lnstallment Costs
57,soo.oo
so.oo
61,soo.oo
So.oo
$9,mo.o0
Dlstrict Balance
Total lmprovement Cosb
Subtotal
Total AvailEble Funds
Total lnstallm€nt cost
contributlons from other sources
Net Balance
s24,2a2.72
(S4s,993.28)
(S21,710.s6)
s72,933.94
9s1,223.38
(s9,OOO.OO)
So.oo
s42,223.3A
Didrict Balance (surplus ii +; d€licit is 0) 542,2233A
Net Asessment Glculatlon
s24,2A2.72
surplus or Deficit (sualus is subtracted, deticit is added) -{@:cr
{s17,940.651
Allocated Net Ass€$ment to Propertv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net ksessment to Property
(s17,940.65)
1g
lsr16.so)
Comparison of Net Assessment and Asse$ment
Allocated Net Assessment to Prope^y
Per Parcel surplus (+l or Deticit l-)
s116.sO
--tgg!-9274.1A
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Steeplechase - lnstallment Summary
SteeolechaseDistrict:

Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s83,778
Short Term lnstallment summarv
Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 Ssoo s8,000fence replacments near park $s00 So s2s0 SO s2s0 Szso Szso s2s0 s2so ss,000year 2 tree pruning s2s0 S2so ss,000vear 3 tree orunins Szso So s2s0 52so s2so s2s0 s2s0 S2so S2so s2s0 ss,000vear 4 tree pruning s2so 5o s250 $o S2so Szso s2s0 s2s0 s2so ss,00oyear 5 tree pruning s1.s00 s1.s00 s1.s00 s1.500 s1.s00 s28,000Totals: $r,soo $o Long Term lnstallment Summary
SoSo SO 5o $o So $o $oTotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2A22-23
SClGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

startins Fund Bolonce las oJ Aptil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe to linance approx. flBt 6 mohths of 22-23 S24,9x9.0o
($4,060.26)
City ot Folsom
Sierra Eslates Landscaping and Lithtlng Distrid
Fund 231
2022-23
lmprovem€nt 6is
G.neral Malntenance Co*s

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. str€etlighls

4. lrigatlon Pats
9a,s32.7O
51,soo.oo
s250.00
s35O.OO
Servlce 6$s

5. 6.

Electrical s32s.OO
58so,oo
current Year lmgrovement Prolects

7. Tree replacement S6,00o.oo
Subtotal oJ ltem 7 S6,m.@
sa7,ao7,7o
lncidental co$s

8. Professional Seruices lEnsinee/s Repon and lP)

9. Cont€ct Seruices (all other contracb and servi.es)

10. Publications/Mailings/communications

11. Slafi

12. overhead

13. Colhty Auditor Fee
$7so.oo
$o.oo
so.oo
s1,144.00
s2X9.OO
574.7s
Subtotal $r"w
Tot.l lmprovement 6$s s19,935.45
Assessment to Propertv lQrrent)
Assessment per Single Family Equivalent
SinCle Family Equivalent Benefit Unib
Total Assessment
s363.68
s9,O92.OO
Shoft-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallmeht Plan lpreviously collected)
Shod-Term lnstallment Plan {collected rhis year)
Lon8-Term lnstallment Plan (collected thas year)
Total lndallm€nt b$s
s2,soo.oo
$o.oo
$soo.oo
so.oo
$3,ooo.m
Dlstd.t Aalance
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
s9,O92.OO
(s19,93s.45)
(S10,843.4s)
S20,8s8.74
S1o,o15-29
(S3,ooo.oo)
So.oo
s7,O15.29
Total lnstallment cost
Conkibutaons from other sourc€s
Net Balance
Dlsrl.t Balance (surplus is +; deflclt ls 0) s7,Or5.29
s9,O92.OO
{s7,01s.291
52,076,77
surplus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; deficit as added) Allocated Net Assessmeht to Propedv
Net Assessment
Single Famlly Equivalent Benefit units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
s2,O75-77
2S
$83.o7
comparlson of Nel Assessment and Assessment
allocat€d Assesrment to Ptopedy
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Delicit G)
(S83.07)
-!ge!!-
s2ao.61
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Sierra Estates - Installment Summary
Distrlct: Sierra Estates
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance l2o22l s24.919
Short Term lnstallment Summaru
SSoo ss00 s7.500Tree reolacement S5oo So Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Totals: ss00 So Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo S50o S7,soo
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: s0 So So 3o So So So $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultlngGroup

07/12/2022 Item No.8.

Storting Fund Bolonce (as ofAptil 2022)
Estimoted Reserye tolinance apprcx. Jitst 6 months oJ 2-23 {$156,417.79)
li26,a2o.7a)
Cityof Folsom
WillowCreek Estates Eart bndscaplng and Li8hting Distrid Fund 249
2022-23
G€neral Maintenance costs

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. lrrjgation

50.m
So.m
so.m
So.m
Sedice costs

5. Electrical s11,m.m
s15,Om.@
Cur.€nt Year lfrprovement Proi€ds

7. No planned projeds So.m
subtotdlof ltem 7 So-m
sr5"otm
a. Professional seruices (En8ineer's Report and lP)
L Contrad SeNaces (all other contrads and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailings/communications

11. Staff
12- Overh€ad

13. countyAuditorFee
57so.m
So.m
so.m
So'@
s2,@.00

50.m
$,1m
s29,1s.@Total lmprovement costs
Assessmentto Propetu {Cuilentl
Assessment per Slngle Famlly Equlvalent
SinSle Family Equivalent Benefit Units
s80.{
$60,o58.S
lnstallment Cosb lsee installment Plan and Summarunexr parel shot-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleded)
tong-Term lnstallment Plan {previously colleded)
Shon Term lnstallment PIan (collect€d this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
total lhstallhehtcorrs
so.m
534mO.m
So.m
So.@
Sil,m.m
Dlstrict &lahce
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contributions f rom other sources
Net Balance
So,os8.80
(529,190.m)
S30,868.80
(51328s8.s7)
lilo7 ,o29.77)
{s34,Om.m)
So@
lst4!,o29.77)
Dlstrldgalance (surplus is +r deflclt is Ol |$ML,O?9.77) Surplus or Deficit {surplus as subtracted; deficit is added) S60,o58.e
s14t,o29.77
s201,0S,57
Allocated NetAssessmeht to Propefl
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net As5essment to Property
s2or"0s.5?
7&
s269.19
Comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Allo6ted Net Assessmeht to Propeny
Allodted Ass€ssment to Propedy
Per Parcel surplus l+) orDeficit {-}
(S25e.19)
-try-
(91S,?9)
from fund balance
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup