Folsom City Council
September 13, 2022

1 Agenda
City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom
Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public
Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority
/ South of 50 Parking Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 September 13, 2022
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular and Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Meeting

Folsom City Council Chambers
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA

www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, September 13, 2022 6:30 PM

Kerri Howell, Mayor

Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Effective July 7, 2022, the City of Folsom returned to all in-person City Council, Commission, and Committee meetings. Remote participation for the public will no longer be offered.

Everyone is invited and encouraged to attend and participate in City meetings in person.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are ent itled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from dis cussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

3 SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming September 17 through 23, 2022 as Constitution Week in the City of Folsom

2. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming the Month of September 2022 as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Folsom

3. Presentation of 2022 Community Service Day
CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

4. Approval of August 23, 2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

5. Resolution No. 10910 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Oil Index Increase with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174-21 20-060) for the Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3(A), Project No. PW1607, Federal Project No. 5288(046)

6. Resolution No. 10912 – A Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants for Which the City of Folsom is Eligible

7. Resolution No. 10913 - A Resolution Amending Resolution Nos. 10478 and 10786 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City Impact and Connection Fees for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact

8. Resolution No 10914 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection Agreement

9. Resolution No. 10915 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for Two Type 1 Fire Engines from Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. and Appropriation of Funds

10. Grant Funds Associated with Development of Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street

1. Resolution No. 10916 - A Resolution Authorizing an Application for the SACOG 2022 Green Means Go Funding Program for Infrastructure and Planning Activities Associated with the Development of 300 Persifer Street

2. Resolution No. 10917 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City’s Allocation of $800,000 in Home Funds Received Through Participation in the SHRA HOME Consortium to Habitat for Humanity for the Construction of 10 Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street

11. Resolution No. 10918 - A Resolution Authorizing and Accepting a Grant Award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and California Office of Emergency Services for the Implementation of the City of Folsom Defensible Space and Vegetation Management Plan
OLD BUSINESS:

12. Resolution No. 10911 – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Proclaiming Termination of COVID-19 Local Emergency

4 NEW BUSINESS:

13. Ordinance No. 1332 – An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adding Chapter 12.25, “Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit”, to the Folsom Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use of Parking Space on City Streets and City-owned Public Properties for Outdoor Dining (Introduction and First Reading)

14. Potential Modifications to City of Folsom Cardroom Ordinance and Direction to City Staff

15. Zoning Code Update – Workshop on Proposed Zoning Administration and Review Process Changes and Direction to Staff

CONVENE JOINT MEETING

JOINT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Joint City Council / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency / Folsom Public Financing Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority / South of 50 Parking Meeting ROLL CALL: Council / Board Members: Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell CONSENT CALENDAR:

16. Approval of the July 12, 2022 Joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes

17. Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly Investment Reports for the Month of June 2022

ADJOURNMENT

RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

COUNCIL COMMENTS:

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow th e same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

5 As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

6 This page is intentionally left blank.

PROCLAMATION

OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING SEPTEMBER 17 THROUGH 23,2022
AS

CONSTITUTION WEEK

IN THE CITY OF FOLSOM
WHEREAS, on September 17, 1787, after four months of debate highlighted by sharp differences of view and by wise compromises, the outstanding leaders of our Republic, who were meeting in convention at Philadelphia, signed the Constitution of the United States of America; and
WHEREAS, the story of the framing, signing, and adoption of that document constitutes one of the most significant chapters in the history of our country; and WHEREAS, it is fitting that every American should reflect upon the vision and fortitude of our forebears in creating a charter designed "to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty" for themselves and for the fortunate millions who were to follow them as citizens of this Nation; and
WHEREAS, for 235 years, America's Constitution has guided our growth and defined us as a Nation of sacred laws and fundamental values; and
WHEREAS, Congress has requested the President to set aside the week beginning September 17 of each year as Constitution Week as a time for the contemplation and commemoration of the historic acts which resulted in the formation of our Constitution.

NOW, THEREFORE, l, Kerri M. Howell, Mayor of the City of Folsom, on behalf of the Folsom City Council, do hereby proclaim September 17 through 23, 2022 as Gonstitution Week in the City of Folsom. During this week, we celebrate our Constitution and the rights of citizenship that together we enjoy as the people of this proud Nation.

PROCLAIMED this 13th day of September 2022
ATTEST:

Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

09/13/2022 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.1.

PROCLAMATION

OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2022
AS

OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS MONTH

IN THE CITY OF FOLSOM
WHEREAS, ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States; and
WHEREAS, ovarian cancer is called the "silent disease" because its symptoms are often vague or subtle; and
WHEREAS, according to the National Cancer Institute, ovarian cancer may not cause early signs or symptoms and it is difficult to screen for the disease; and WHEREAS, because ovarian cancer often goes undetected until advanced stages, increasing awareness of risk factors is critical to fighting this disease; and WHEREAS, the good health and well-being of women is enhanced by increased awareness about ovarian cancers and their symptoms and treatments; and WHEREAS, it is critical for women and healthcare providers to recognize the risk factors and symptoms of ovarian and gynecologic cancers and to remember the importance of early detection in preventing and treating these diseases; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom joins communities across our nation to increase the awareness about the importance of early detection, testing, and treatment for ovarian cancer.

NOW, THEREFORE, l, Kerri M. Howell, Mayor of the City of Folsom on behalf of the Folsom City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of September 2022 as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Folsom to increase awareness about the importance of early detection and treatment of this disease.

PROCLAIMED this 13th day of September 2022.

ATTEST:

Kerri M. Howell, Mayor Christa Freemantle, City Clerk

09/13/2022 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Community Service Day Steering Committee will provide a brief overview of the2022 Folsom Community Service Day taking place on Saturday, September 17,2022.

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
No action is required of the City Council at this time.

Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks & Recreation Director
MEETING DATE: 9n312022
AGENDA SECTION: S cheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentationof 2022 Community Service Day
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department
1

09/13/2022 Item No.3.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.3.

Book 76 Page 290
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
City Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, August 23, 2022
5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding ROLL GALL:

CITY COUNCIL PRESENT
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski
Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez
Councilmember Sarah Aquino
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla
Mayor Kerri Howell
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN

STAFF PRESENT
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
ADJOURNMENT TO GLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Threat to Public Services or Facilities Pursuant to Government Codd Section 54957(a).

Consultation with: Folsom Police Department, Chief of Police Rick Hillman

2. Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8: A portion of the Folsom Historic District Station Plaza located at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070- 0052-023 for temporary use as an lce Rink. Negotiating Parties: City Manager Elaine Andersen on behalf of the City of Folsom, and Jim Snook on behalf of the Folsom Historic District Association. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Lease

3. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: lnterim Human Resources Director John Spittler. Employee Organization: Various Bargaining Groups
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to adjourn to Closed Session for the above referenced items. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Howell Councilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): None
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 13 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page291
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022

REGONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during Closed Session

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:31 p.m

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 14 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page292
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
City Gouncil Regular Meeting

MINUTES
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, August 23, 2022
6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at632 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding ROLL CALL:

CITY COUNCIL PRESENT
Councilmember M ike Kozlowski
Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez
Councilmember Sarah Aquino
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla
Mayor Kerri Howell

STAFF PRESENT
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Public Works Director Mark Rackovan

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang advised that additional information was available for item 23 BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speaker(s) addressed the City Council

1. Jason Davis, regarding unhoused residents

2. Jim Harville, regarding railroad signals

3. Rick Brebrick, regarding local bars' practice of scanning drivers licenses SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming the Month of September 2022 as Prostate Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Folsom
Councilmember Sarah Aquino presented the proclamation.

2. lnformational Briefing from the Sacramento Area Council of Goveinments (SACOG) Regarding the Blueprint Project (formerly known as the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy)
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 15 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page 293
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski introduced the item, and SACOG Executive Director James Corless made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

3. Report from Ad Hoc City Council Subcommittee on City Properties Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriquez and Councilmember Sarah Aquino presented a report from the Ad Hoc Committee. They presented recommendations for next steps. lt was the City Council's consensus to move forward with the following recommendations:

General Recommendations:
. Establish a real estate fund
. Consider retaining a commercial real estate professional . lnvestigate Surplus Land Act process
. Reappoint committee and expand scope
Property #0 Recommendation:
o Sell
Properties #1 and #2 Recommendation:
. Continue to study and explore possible uses
o Consider lot line adjustments of parcels to create usable parcels . Consider a design to complement Johnny Cash Legacy Park . Consider some parcels for oak tree mitigation
Property #3 Recommendation:
. Great potential for a unique development
o lnitiate conversation with owner of adjacent lot
r lnvestigate Surplus Land Act process
. Good example of how a dedicated real estate fund could allow city to sell or acquire key properties
Property #4 Recommendation :
. Retain for possible trail connection to Sutter St
o Rezone to park / open space
Property #5 Recommendation:
o Rezone to park / open space
Properties #7 and #8 Recommendation:
o lnitiate conversation with Kikkoman regarding larger vision for this area . Possible tree mitigation area
Property #9 Recommendation:
. Relocate corp yard annex to existing or new corp yard o Activate non-leased portion of property
o Restore / activate Superintendent's House (HistoriCorps) . Develop longterm vision
Property #1 0 Recommendation:
o lssue RFQ for transit-oriented development
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 16 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page294
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
Property #1 1 Recommendation:
. Ask WAPA about interest in purchasing
o Property has no access from street
. Possible River District opportunity?
Property #1 2 Recommendation:
. Ask adjacent property owner about interest in northern parcel (smaller parcel) . Retain southern parcel as it contains existing trail and Willow Creek corridor Property #1 3 Recommendation:
. Refer to Library Commission for their input on how best to activate the space and generate revenue with potential uses not limited to food vendors. Report back to Council with recommendation within 90 days.

Property #1 4 Recommendation:
. Refer to Parks & Rec Commission for their input on how best to activate the space and the surrounding district and possibly generate additional revenue o Consider whether it would be better to outsource all operations to a third party, or continue existing partnership with FHDA with possible limitation on the number of free uses per year
. Report back to council with recommendations within 90 days Property #1 5 Recommendation:
r Refer to Parks & Rec Commission for their input on how best to activate the space and generate revenue
. Consider a public/private partnership or issuing an RFP for promoter to manage and operate venue
e Explore other uses
. Report back to Council with recommendation within 90 days Next Steps Recommendations:
o Refer Einstein Caf6 Space to Library Commission
. Refer Zittel Family Amphitheater and Dan RussellArena to Parks & Rec Commission . City Manager to return to council with:
. Plan and timeline for selling Property #0 (Fong Street) . lnfo regarding Surplus Land Act as it relates to key properties such as 906 Leidesdorff and Glenn Station
. Plan for activation of unleased portion of Wye Property o Plan to engage adjacent property owners on Parkshore and Glenn and determine fair market value of city properties
GONSENT GALENDAR:

4. Re-Approval of July 12,2022 Regular Meeting Minutes

5. Approval of July 26,2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 17 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page 295
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022

6. Designation of Primary and Alternate Voting Delegates for the League of California Cities 2022 Annual Conference Business Meeting
7 . Ordinance No. 1330 - An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to lmprovement Area No. 6 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)

8. Resolution No. 10856 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 1 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 1 Subdivision

9. Resolution No. '10857 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 4 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map forthe Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 4 Subdivision

10. Resolution No. 10858 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 2 & 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 3 Village No. 2 & 3 Subdivision
1 1 . Resolution No. 10885 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans for the lntelligent Transportation Systems (lTS) Master Plan lmplementation Project, Project No. 2480, Federal Project No. 5288(052)

12. Resolution No. 10897 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Pape Machinery for the Purchase of a Wheel Loader Tractor

13. Resolution No. 10899 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, lnc. for the Fire Station No. 34 Phase-1 Project
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski pulled item 13 to recuse himself from the vote due to a potential conflict of interest.

Motion made by Mayor Kerri Howell, seconded by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to approve Resolution No 10899. Motion carried with the following roll callvote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski (recused)
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None

14. Resolution No. 10900 -A Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 10527 and Designating Conflict of lnterest Filing Positions and Disclosure Categories

15. Resolution No. 10901 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Russell Ranch Phase 2, Village Nos. 1 , 2 & 4 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Village Nos. 1,2&4 Subdivision
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 18 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page 296
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022

16. Resolution No. 10902 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Russell Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision

17. Resolution No. 10903 - A Resolution of the City Council Approving an Acquisition and Shortfall Agreement for the Community Facilities District No. 23 lmprovement Area No. 3 (Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch)

18. Resolution No. 10904 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Kimley Horn and Associates, lnc. for the lntelligent Transportation Systems (lTS) Master Plan lmplementation Project, Federal Project No. 5288(052)
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla pulled item 18 to talk about other cities' intelligent transportation systems.

Motion made by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember YK Chalamcherla to approve Resolution No. 10904. Motion carried with the following roll callvote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Howell Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s

19. Resolution No. 10905 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Western Truck Parts and Equipment Company, LLC. for the Purchase of 14 Solid Waste Collection Vehicles

20. Resolution No. 10907 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for a Grant for the Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher lncentive Project (HVIP) Funding through Western Truck Parts and Equipment Company, LLC for the Purchase of Two Electric Refuse Collection Vehicles

21. Resolution No. 10908 - A Resolution Authorizing Submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2022-23 to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments

22. Resolution No. 10909 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Western Truck Parts and Equipment Company, LLC for the Purchase of Two Electric Refuse Collection Vehicles and Appropriation of Funds
Motion made by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember YK Ghalamcherla to approve the Consent Galendar except for items 13 and 18.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
ouncilmember(s
ouncilmember(s
ouncilmember(s
c
c
c
: Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Howell
: None
: None
: None
)
)
)
)
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 19 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page 297
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
NEW BUSINESS:

23. Ordinance No. 1331 - An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adding Sections 10.20.290,

10.20.295, and 10.20.300 to the Folsom Municipal Code to Establish a Residential Permit Parking Program in Designated Areas of the Historic District (lntroduction and First Reading) Public Works Director Mark Rackovan made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

The following speakers addressed the City Council:

1. Robert Holderness

2. Mike Reynolds
It was the City Council's consensus to allow:
o Two permits per address; if an applicant wants more than two permits, the vehicles must be registered at the address.
. $50 per permit for a two-year period (Staff to evaluate administration cost and the fee may be adjusted in the future).

Motion made by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, seconded by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowskito introduce Ordinance No. 1331.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
OLD BUSINESS:

24. Review Proclamation of COVID-19 Local Emergency Under City Council Resolution No. 10408 and Direction to Staff
City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation detailing the content of each emergency ordered issued since March2020. She responded to questions from the City Council.

It was the City Council's consensus to direct staff to return with items rescinding prior emergency orders and allowing certain parklets for outdoor dining.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

City Manager Elaine Andersen spoke of the status of the East Bidwell Street widening project and advised that an accessory dwelling unit design workbook is available on the City's website. She announced upcoming events including the Rolling Hills Blue Star Mom's donation drive and Community Service Day.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 20 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Book 76 Page 298
Folsom City Council
August 23,2022
COUNCIL GOMMENTS:

Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez provided a summary from the recent study mission to St. Louis. She commented regarding the Homeless Council meeting and the City Council Candidate Forum she attended. She spoke about upcoming high school football games and asked for a status of the Folsom Lake Crossing barrier.

Councilmember YK Chalamcherla said he will be visiting schools to observe traffic and that he is exploring technology companies to bring to Folsom. He commented about meeting with the Friends of Lake Natoma and a Folsom Lake volunteer group and said that volunteers are still needed for Community Service Day.

Councilmember Mike Kozlowski spoke of the trip to St. Louis. He commented regarding the Friends of Folsom Parkway and Hinkle Creek Nature Center meeting and indicated interest in annexing a strip of county property in the area.

Councilmember Sarah Aquino spoke of her visit to Lancaster to tour the BYD Company to look at electric transit options.

Mayor Kerri Howell noted upcoming regional meetings she will be attending and encouraged everyone to slow down when driving.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Kerri Howell adjourned the meeting at 9:23 pm.

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 21 09/13/2022 Item No.4.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10910 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Oil Index Increase with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174-21 20-060) for the Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3(A), Project No. PWl607, Federal Project No. 5288(046)
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10910 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Oil Index Increase with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174-2120-060) for the Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3(A), Project No. PW1607, Federal Project No. s288(046).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The planned Capital Southeast Connector is a 34-mile limited access roadway spanning from U.S. 50 at Silva Valley Parkway interchange in El Dorado County to Interstate 5 at the Hood- Franklin Interchange in Elk Grove. The Connector is planned to be constructed in segments as funding and priorities allow. Segment D3 includes the length of the Connector that borders the City of Folsom and Sacramento County from Prairie City Road to the El Dorado County Line.

Segment El is the El Dorado County Segment that Segment D3 ties into.

Segment D3 has been further segmented into two additional segments: D3(A) and D3(B).

Segment D3(A) will upgrade the existing White Rock Road to a four-lane expressway beginning near the intersection of Prairie City Road and continuing through the intersection of East Bidwell Street. The project involves constructing four lanes between these two major 1

09/13/2022 Item No.5.
intersections, including a bridge over Alder Creek. The bridge also serves as a "wildlife crossing," as contemplated in the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan.

The project is a complete reconstruction that will create a new alignment of White Rock Road adjacent to and immediately south of the existing White Rock Road. The existing White Rock Road will remain open to traffic during construction. The project was initially designed to include a Class 1 Bike Trail and interconnection between traffic signals. These two items of work had been removed from the project due to funding constraints.

The City of Folsom is leading the construction ofthis project on behalf of the Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and in collaboration with Sacramento County.

The City has secured State Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) and SB1 funding from Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) in partnership with the Capital Southeast Connector JPA. A request for authorization to proceed with construction was submitted to Caltrans on May 15,2020. The Authoizationto Proceed (E-76) was received on June 25, 2020, and the subsequent Supplemental Agreement was received on August 8,2020.

Per contract, Special Provision Section 9-I.07, payment adjustments for Price Index Fluctuations are allowed for asphalt binder oil based on the published Caltrans Statewide Crude Oil Price Index. At bid time the index was227.8. The Southeast Connector paving dates from July through December 202I shows the Oil Index range was 373.7 to 456.2 where the difference between the index at the time of paving compared to the index at the bid opening provides the value needed to calculate the compensation. The additional cost per the previous Oil Price Index change order was $354,766.26. The Oil Index range from March2022 to June 2022 was 507.2 to 622 with an additional cost to the project of $316,592.88 for a total of $671,359.14 to date. It is expected that additional compensation will be required after the final paving of the bike trail is complete. In the event that the index is lower than the index on the day of bid opening the City would be due a credit.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
This project was publicly advertised on July 13, 2020, and bids were opened publicly on September 9,2020, at2:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber.

Six bids were received with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC being the lowest responsive responsible bid as follows:
2 Page 24
09/13/2022 Item No.5.

Contractor Rankine Bid Amount
Goodfellow Brothers, LLC Lowest Responsive
Responsible Bid
$22,368,765.00
The Lowest Responsive Responsible Bid Proposal provided by Goodfellow Brothers, LLC was reviewed by staff and found to be in good order.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
The Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3(A) is eligible to receive funds from FAST Act funding based on a SACOG Regional Surface Transportation Program Grant and SB-1 Funding. Funding for construction and construction engineering is shown below:

Fund Fund Type Amount
FAST Act Surface Transportation Block Grant
to match SB-1 Funding I to 1 at
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
SBl Competitive $1,0,000,000
Local
Transportation
Fund (446)
To match Surface Transportation
Block Grant of $15,000,000 at
tI.47%
$1,720,500
Local
Transportation
Fund (446)
To Cover Balance of Project
Funding
sL,195,147
Local
Transportation
Fund (446)
SouthEast Connector Joint Powers
Authority Contribution to Bike Trail
CCO (Added to Contingency)
$400,000
Project Budget for Construction $28,315,396
The FAST Act funding requires a local match of lI.47Yo. The Transportation Fund (Fund 446) will be utilized to meet the required match of $1,720,500. The SBl funding requires a $100% match, of which $10,000,000 of the FAST Act funding will be utilized as the match.

The agreement with Goodfellow previously approved is in the amount of $22,368 ,765 with a budgeted contingency of $2,236,876.50 (10%) for a total contract budget amount of $24,605,641.50. The agreement with Goodfellow was also adjusted by the costs for the Pedestrian/Bike trail that was included per Resolution 10845 dated May 10, 2022 and was included as a change order with Goodfellow for a total change order amount of $2,636,876.50. aJ

09/13/2022 Item No.5.

The contract costs for construction and construction management have been previously approved by City Council in separate resolutions as follows:

Company Description Cost
Doug Veerkamp General
Engineering; Inc.

Contract for Utility Pole
Relocation Gradine
$127,353.22
Goodfellow Brothers, LLC Construction $22,368,765.00
l0% Contingency for
Construction
$2,236,876.50
Additional funding provided by
SouthEast Connector JPA for
Bike Trail
$400,000.00
Salaber Associates, Inc. Construction Engineering,
Inspection, and Materials Testing
$2,992,848.00
Dokken Engineering, Inc Design Support and
Environmental Services
$317,157.28
Project Budget for Construction $28,443,000
The Contract Change Order for the changes in the Oil Index will utilize the existing Contingency in the amount of $316,592.88. The current contingency utilized including this request is $22,292,92I.80,Ieaving a balance of $343,954.20. No adjustments to the project budget will be required. The current approved project budget is $28,443,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ln 2016 the Capital Southeast Connector JPA approved a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Tiered Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3 lEI.

Caltrans approved the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorical Exclusion for Segment D3/E1.

The project is not located in an environmentally sensitive area andwould not result in potential impacts to the environment, including traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality.

ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 10910 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Oil Index Increase with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174- 21 20-060) for the Capital Southeast Connector Segment D3(A), Project No. PW1607, Federal Project No. 5288(046)
4

09/13/2022 Item No.5.

Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
5

09/13/2022 Item No.5.

RESOLUTION NO. 10910

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER FOR THE OIL INDEX INCRE,ASE WITH
GOODFELLOW BROTHERS, LLC (CONTRACT NO. 174-2120-060) FOR THE CAPTTAL SOUTHEAST CONNECTOR SEGMENT D3(A), PROJECT NO. PW1607, FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 5288(046)
WHEREAS, the Capital SouthEast Connector Project is the Sacramento region's largest single transportation project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom is a Member Jurisdiction of the Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority and will implement the Project; and WHEREAS, the Capital SouthEast Connector Project has, to date, been funded primarily through a Sacramento County sales-tax measure approved in2004by 75 percent of voters; and WHEREAS, the Capital SouthEast Connector Project has established a program development budget that requires the use of Federal and State funds to advance the project towards timely construction; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to construct the Capital SouthEast Connector Project Segment D3(A) along the City's border to four lanes with two eight-foot shoulders; and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom received Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funding, and is eligible for federal reimbursement, up to $15,000,000; and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom received SB-l funding, and is eligible for state reimbursement up to $10,000,000; and
WHEREAS, this project was publicly advertised on July 13,2020, with six bids received on September 9,2020, with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC being the lowest responsive responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom entered into a contract with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC for construction of the Capital SouthEast Connector Segment D3(A); and WHEREAS, a Contract Change Order will be utilized to compensate Goodfellow Brothers, LLC for adjustments in Caltrans Statewide Crude Oil Price Index; and WHEREAS, the cost of changes to the Caltrans Statewide Crude Oil Price Index of $316,592.88 is within the existing project budget contingency; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

Resolution No. 10910
Page I of2 Page 28
09/13/2022 Item No.5.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Oil Index Increase with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174-21 20-060) for the Capital SouthEast Connector SegmentD3(A), ProjectNo. PWl60T,FederalProjectNo. 5288(046),inthe amountof $316,592.

88. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13ft day of September 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10910
Page2 ofZ Page 29
09/13/2022 Item No.5.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.5.
r I f ;, --: I i:\'i
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 91t312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: ResolutionNo. 10912 - A Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants for Which the City of Folsom is Eligible
FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10912 - A Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants for Which the City of Folsom is Eligible.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) offers funding opportunities authorized by legislation to assist public and private entities in the safe and effective management of the waste stream in an effort to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste.

The grant opportunities that CalRecycle provides consist of rubberized pavement, solid waste cleanup, greenhouse gas reduction, beverage container recycling, household hazardous waste, and used oil recycling grants. Each of the grant opportunities hab varying requirements and funding possibilities depending upon the applied grant.

POLICY / RULE
In order for the City of Folsom to submit a grartt application, CalRecycle requires that a resolution be passed by the governing body authorizing such application submifials and that the resolution may be valid for a period of up to five years.

I

09/13/2022 Item No.6.

ANALYSIS
On October 24, 2017, City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 10027, a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or hisftrer designee, to submit applications to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Folsom is eligible for a period of five years from the date of adoption. The five-year period is set to expire in October and this resolution will extend the authoizalion period for another five years.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The award of these grant funds does not require a local funding match. However, in most cases, the grant funds are supplemental to a project's primary funding source. Any grants that require a local funding match will be brought to the City Council for consideration as required.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 10912 - A Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants for Which the City of Folsom is Eligible Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
2 Page 32
09/13/2022 Item No.6.

RESOLUTION NO. IO9I2

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATIONS F'OR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS F'OR WHICH THE CITY OF FOLSOM IS ELIGIBLE WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California's (state) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the state thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment; and
WHEREAS' in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS' CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant's governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe City Council authorizes the submittal of applications to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Folsom is eligible and that do not require local funding match.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or hislher designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the rulme of the City of Folsom all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these authorizations are effective for five years from the date of adoption of this resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13ft day of September 2022, by the following roll-call vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10912
Page I ofl Page 33
09/13/2022 Item No.6.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff requests the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10913 - A Resolution Amending Resolution Nos. 10478 and 10786 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City Impact and Connection Fees for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail lmpact

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In May 2006,the City Council adopted ResolutionNo. 7812 which established new city impact and connection fees for law enforcement, fire suppression, general facilities, vehicles and equipment, park improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, housing trust, water, sanitary sewer, transportation improvement, drainage, and light rail. Resolution No. 7812 also approved an annual infl ationary adj ustment.

POLICY / RULE
1 MEETING DATE: 91t312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10913 - A Resolution Amending Resolution Nos. 10478 and 10786 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City Impact and Connection Fees for Law
Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek,
Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste,
Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact F'ROM: Finance Department
Folsom Municipal Code

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

The Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows:
. Section 03.20.045 - Solid Waste Fee
. Section 03.80.040 - Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement . Section 03.90.010 - Housing Trust Fee
. Section 04.10.010 - Park Improvement
. Section 04.12.010 - Humbug-Willow Creek Fee
. Section 10.50.040 - Light Rail
. Section 12.04.060 - Transportation Improvement
. Section 13.24.050 - Water Connection
. Section 13.25.010 - Sewer Connection
. Section 13.30.010 - Water Impact Fee
. Section I7.95.010 - Drainage Improvement

ANALYSIS
In accordance with ResolutionNo. 7812, adopted May 23,2006, Staff has calculated proposed fee schedules to be effective October 1,2022 and effective January 1,2023 for the Housing Trust Fund Fee. The annual inflationary adjustment to be appliedis 5.82Yo. This percentage adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 202I. The proposed fee schedules were derived by applying the annual inflationary adjustment to the current fee.

The proposed October l, 2022, fee schedules are included in Resolution No. 00000 as Attachment 1 and the Construction Cost Index obtained from the Engineering News Record is included as Attachmerft 2.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10913 - A Resolution Amending Resolution Nos. 10478 and 10786 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City Impact and Connection Fees for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact

2. Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index
I
2 Tamagni, Finance Director

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 1

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

RESOLUTION NO. 10913
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NOS. 10478 AND 10786 ANI)

ENACTING THE ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY IMPACT

AND CONNECTION FEES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE SUPPRESSION,

GENERAL FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT, PARK IMPROVEMENT, HUMBUG.WILLOW CREEKO HOUSING TRUSTO WATER' SANITARY SEWERO

SOLID WASTE, TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT, DRAINAGEN AND LIGHT

RAIL IMPACT
WHEREAS, the Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows:
1). Section 03.20.045 - Solid Waste Fee
2). Section 03.80.040 - Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement 3). Section 03.90.010 - Housing Trust Fee
4). Section 04.10.010 - Park Improvement
5). Section 04.12.010 - Humbug-Willow Creek
6). Section 10.50.040-LightRail
7). Section 12.04.060 - Transportation Improvement
S). Section 13.24.050 - Water Connection
9). Section 13.25.010 - Sewer Connection
10). Section 13.30.010 - Water Impact Fee
11). Section 17.95.010 - Drainage Improvement; and
WHEREAS' ResolutionNo. 7812 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 23,2006, allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to selected City Impact and Connection fees each fiscal year, and
WHEREAS, the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 2021 and the annual adjustment to be applied is 5.82%o; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom Enacts the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City Impact and Connection Fees as of October 1,2022 for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees as set forth in the fee schedules attached hereto and enacts the Annual Inflationary Adjustment as of January l, 2023 for the Housing Trust Fee.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this l3th day of September 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

Resolution No. 10913
Page I of8 Page 38
09/13/2022 Item No.7.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 10913

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

City of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule as of October 1", 2022 r'EE DESCRIPTION BASIS F'EE
Tlol/2020
Reso 10478
Annual
fnflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPII
F'EE
t0/ou2022
Proposed
Police, Fire, & Gen Fac (FMc 3.8o.01o)
POLICE
S ingle Fami$ ResiJential
Muhi- F amily Res ilential
Mobile Dwellings
Corrrnercbl t odging
C ornrnercial Developrnent
Industrial Developrnent
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

X'TRE
Single Fami$ Resilential
Muhi-Family Resilentbl
Mobile Dwellings
Cornnrerciallrdging
C ornrrrercbl Developrent
Industrial Developrrrcnt
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

GENERALF'ACILITIES
S ingle F amily ResirJential
Mufti- Family Res ilential
Mobile Dwellings
Corrnrercbl Indging
C ornnrercbl Development
Industrial Developrnent
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

GENERAL PARK EQUIPMENT
Single Famfu Residential
Multi- Family Res ilential
Mobile Dwellings
C orrrnercbl Deve loprrent
Industial Devebprrrcnt
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.
$
$
$
$
$
$
601
681
156
35 1.012

0.875
1,086
1,050
1,083
939

0.634
o.276
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,596
r,596
1,589
228

0.498

0.495
$
$
$
$
$
94 94
44 0.018

0.018
35 40
9 2

0.0s9

0.051
$
$
$
$
$
$
63 6T
63 55

0.037

0.016
$
$
$
$
$
$
93 93
92 13

0.029

0.029
$
$
$
$
$

0.00 0.00
5 5
J
1 1
636
721
165
37 t.o7t

0.926
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,149
1,111
1,146
994

0.671

0.292
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,689
1,689
1,681
241
o.527

0.524
$
$
$
$
$
99 99
47 0.019

0.019
Resolution No. 10913

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

Cify of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule as of October L, 2022

FEEDESCRIPTION BASIS F'EE
7t0u2020
Reso 10478
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPIr
FEE
10t0U2022
Proposed
Drainase (rNIc tz.gs.oso)
S ingle Family Resitlential
Muhi Family Re silential
Mobile Dwellings
C ommercial DevelopmenVOffce
Industrial Development
Unit
Unit
Unit
Acre
Acre
Light RaiI Impact Fee (FMc to.so.onot
S ingle F amily ResiJential
MuhiFami$ResiCential
Mobile Dwellings
C ommerc ial Development/O ff ce
Industrial Development
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Tmnsportation ImpIov Fee (rruc rz.oa.ooot
S ingle Family ResiCential
MuhiFami} ResiCential
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial
IndustriaVOfice
Other
Additional Land Uses
HidrTlry Commercial
Gas Stationsl
' per fireling statbn
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq Ft.

Sq Ft.

Sq Ft.

Sq
Sq
Ft.

Ft.
$
$
$
$
$
1,037
1,037
1,037
6,302
6,302
724
498
498

0.230

0.095
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
9,168
5,717
5,777
t2.27

5.33 s.33

48.67 10,914
$
$
$
$
$
60 60
60 367
367
$
$
$
$
$
42 29
29 0.013

0.006
$
$
$
$
$
s
$
$
475
JJJ
JJJ

0.714

0.310

0.310

2.83 63s
$
$
$
s
$
1,097
1,097
1,097
6,669
6,669
$
$
$
$
$
766
527
527

0.243

0.101
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,643
6,050
6,050

12.98 5.64

5.64 $ s 1.s0
$ 11,549
Resolution No, 10913

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

City of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule as of October 1, 2022

FEE DESCRIPTION BASIS F'EE
7tou2020
Reso 10478
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPII
F'EE
10t0U2022
Proposed
Waterfmpact Fees (FMc 13.30.010)
Single Famry Resilential
Mufti F amily Resllential
Commercbl
Indusfial/Ofice
Unit
Unit
Acre
Acre
Water Connection Fees (rMC 13.24.010)
S ingle Fami$ Resilential
Mufti Famib/ Resijential
L,exington Hills
Mobile Home
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Commercial
3/4" meter
1" metef
I ID" metet
2" metgt
3" meter
4" meter
6" metef
8" meter
10" meter
$
$
$
$
985
s30
1,326
1,326
$
$
$
$
3,361
2,185
2,082
2,185
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,353
8,360
16,726
26,766
53,547
83,695
167,449
268,010
385,608
$
$
$
$
57 31
77 77
$
$
$
$
t96
t27
72t
r27
s
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
195
487
973
1,558
3,116
4,871
9,746
15,598
22,442
$
$
$
$
r,042
561.
1,403
r,403
$
$
$
$
3,557
2,312
2,203
2,312
$ 3,548
$ 8,847
s 17,699
$ 28,324
$ 56,663
$ 88,566
$ 177,196
$ 283,608
$ 408,050
Resolution No. 10913

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

City of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule as of October 1, 2022 FEEDESCRIPTION BASIS r.EE
71ou2020
Reso 10478
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPf
r.EE
t0/01t2022
Proposed
SewerConnection X'ees fi'MC 13.25.010)
Single Family Resilential
Muhi- Family Res ilential
Lexington Hills
Mobile llome
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Commercial
3/4" meter
1" meter
I l/2" meter
2" meter
3" meter
4" rtreter
6" meter
8" meter
10" meter
$
$
$
$
1,073
839
83s
949
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,073
1,073
2"r49
3,438
6,446
r0,744
21,487
34,379
49,419
$
$
$
$
62 49
49 55
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
62 62
t25
200
375
625
1,251
2,OOl
2,976
$
$
$
$
1,135
888
884
I,OO4
$ 1,135
$ 1,135
$ 2,274
$ 3,638
$ 6,821
$ 11,369
$ 22,738
$ 36,380
$ 52,295
Solid Waste Capital Improvement Fee (rllc r.zo.oao
S ingle Family ResiJential
Mobile Homes
Unit
Unit
CommerciaYMulti Famity
2yatd dumpster
3 yard dumpster
4 yatd dumpster
6yard dumpster
15 yard roll-off
20 yard roll
30 yard roll
40 yard roll
$
$
363
r66
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,064
4,O92
4,149
4,319
73,3O4
13,661
7421r
-1.4,519
$
$
2I
10 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
237
238
24t
251
774
795
827
845
$
$
384
176
$ 4,301
$ 4,330
$ 4,390
$ 4,570
$ 14,078
$ 14,456
$ 15,038
$ 15,364
Resolution No. 10913

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

City of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule as of October 1, 2022 I Engineering Ne,us Record Consnucfion Cost Index - 202 1 Annual Average Resolution No. 10913

F'EEDESCRIPTION BASIS F'EE
7tou2020
Reso 10478
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPII
FEE
t0tOl/2022
Proposed
Part Construction Capital Impact (FMc 4.10)'z
S ingle Family Resijential
Muft i Family Resllential
S enbr Re s ilential Hous ing
Mobile Dwellings
C onrmercial Development
Industrial Development
Unit
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,037
4,675
3,614
2,701

0.476

0.476
$
$
$
$
$
$
41,0
272
210
t57

0.028

0.028
$
$
$
$
s
$
7,447
4,947
3,824
2,858

0.504

0.504
Humbus-Willow Cree k (PNIc n.rzt
S ingle Family Resilential
Mufti F amily Re silential
Mobile Dwellings
C ornmercial Development
Industrial Development
Unit
Unit
Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.
$
$
$
$
$
276
174
151

0.067

0.067
t6
10 9

0.004

0.004
$
$
s
$
$
292
184
160

0.071

0.071

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

City of X'olsom
fmpact and Connection X'ee Schedule As of January 1r2023 I Engineering News Record Constructian Cost Indq. - 2021 Annual Average Resolution No. 10913

FEE DESCRIPTION BASIS FEE
2/01t2022
Reso 10786
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
2021 Annual CPI
FEE
U0u2023
Proposed
Housinq Trust (FMc a.go.olo)
Offce
Retail
Light Industrial
Heavy IndustriallManufacturing
Ligfut IndusfiaVManuficturing
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.
$
$
$
$
$

1.76 t.76
r.76

1.76 1.76
$
$
$
$
$

0.103

0.103

0.1 03

0.103

0.103
$
$
$
$
$
1 I
1 I
1 .86
.86
.86
.86
.86

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 2

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

Construction Cost lndex History - As of
August 2022
HOW ENR BUILDS THE INDEX: 200 hours of common labor at the 2O-city average of common labor rates, ptus 25 cwtof standard structuralsteel shapes atthe mitl price priorto 1996 and the fabricated 20-city price from 1996, plus 1.128 tons of portland cement atthe 2O-city price, plus L,088 board ft of 2 x 4 lumber at the 20-city price.

View the ANNUAL AVERAGE FOR ENR'S CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX.

ENR'S CONSTRUCTTON COST TNDEX HTSTORY (L9Oe-20221
2022
:
', 2021
l
'2020
12,555.55
11,627
t1,392
11,206
I 0,878
lo,s42
10,132
9,972
9,664
9,437
9,176
12,898.96
11,849'
11,412
11,228 t
10,971
10,678
10,279
9,992
9,7s0
9,484 ,
9,273
13,004.47
11,989,
I 1,418
:
11,230 i
11,013
9,'196
:
9,s16
9,290
13,1 10.50
12,1t2
11,436
11,268
I 1,069
10,703
10,337
1 0,039
9,800
9,s42
92,9t
t3,167.84
12,237
t1,439
11,293
I I,l l6
10,789
10,379
10,037
9,835
9,552
9,324
13,171.07
: 12,463
11,455
. 11,31I
tt,t24
I
10,826
10,385
I to,oss
9,846
q 545
9,351
i
12,464 ,
11,499
tt,gtt i
I r,170
10,823 j
10,403
10,065 I
I
9,870
9,552 |
9,341
I 1,539
11,326 '
a
I 1,183
10,817
10,434
:

I 0,128
9,886
:
9,689
,)
9,376
11,465.67
ll,281
11,062
10,737
10,338
10,035
9,806
12,683.97 12,791.43
11,698 11,749 :
11,396 1r,397
11,213 . 11,228
10,889
1 0,559
10,181
9,962
9,681
9,453
I
9,198
'l12,464 12,467 i 12,481i1
12,133
2019
2018
2017
2016
201s
2014
0,959
0,667
0,242
10,692
10,315
o 07<
11,579 11,626
11,381 : 11,381
1 1,184 I 1,186
l
10,870 I 10,873
10,442 10,530
t0,092
9,9t2
10,152
9,936
9,972
9,702
9,4s6
9,268
I 2013
2012
9,666 9,668 9,547
93,98 9,412 9,308

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

This page is intentionally lefr blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
The Finance Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10914 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection Agreement.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In Novemb er, l974,the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD) Board executed the Master Interagency Agreement (MIA) with agencies receiving wastewater service from SRCSD. In a subsequent amendment, the MIA identified SRCSD (then County Sanitation District No. 1), the City of Sacramento, and the City of Folsom as contributing agencies. The primary pulpose of the MIA is to speciff the responsibilities between SRCSD and its Contributing Agencies on the financing, maintenance and operation of wastewater collection, conveyance, and treatment facilities and collection of sewer rates and sewer impact fees.

The updated MIA was adopted by ResolutionNo. 10591 on February 23,2021. This is the subsequent Billing and Collection Agreement, which identifies the terms to which the City of Folsom will be reimbursed for the billing and collection of SRCSD rates on behalf of SRCSD, and assumption of debt by SRCSD.
1 2MEETING DATE: 9n312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: ResolutionNo 10914 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection
Agreement
FROM: Finance Department

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $62,657 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
This agreement does not have any impact on City operations or City customers. The City will continue to bill and collect SRCSD rates, and SRCSD will reimburse the City for the avoided cost of billing. The reimbursed amount is based on an average annual cost per account SRCSD would have to pay to directly bill sewer rates. Additionally, the assumption of bad debt that is billed on behalf of SRCSD will be absorbed by SRCSD.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
This agreement estimates that the City will receive approximately $107,000 annually from SRCSD for the avoided cost of billing.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Execution of this agreement is not considered a project and therefore not subject to CEQA.

ATTACHMENTS

1. ResolutionNo 10914 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection Agreement

2. Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection Agreement
Submitted,
Stacey Tamagni, Chief Financial Officer
2 Page 50
09/13/2022 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 1

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. IO9I4

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF

FOLSOM BILLING AND COLLECTION AGREEMENT
WHEREAS' in November, 1974, the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD) executed the Master Interagency Agreement (MlA) with agencies receiving wastewater service from the SRCSD, and in a subsequent Amendment, identified the City of Folsom as a contributing agency; and
WHEREAS, the current MIA specifies the responsibilities between SRCSD and its Contributing Agencies on the financing, maintenance and operation of wastewater collection, conveyance, and treatment facilities and collection of sewer rates and impact fees and was approved by ResolutionNo. 10591 on February 23,2021; ard WHEREAS' the SRCSD Board established a subcommittee to meet with the City of Folsom to come to an agreement on the proposed Billing and Collection Agreement; and WHEREAS, the SRCSD Board approved this Agreement on August 24,2022; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and the City of Folsom Billing and Collection Agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13ft day of September,2022, by the following roll-call vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10914
Page I of 1 Page 52
09/13/2022 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 2

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND

THE CITY OF X'OLSOM

BILLING AND COLLECTION
Date

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228

BILLING AND COLLECTION AGREEMENT
THIS BILLING AND COLLECTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as on , by and between the SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as "REGIONAL SAN"), a political subdivision of the State of California and CITY OF FOLSOM (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), a municipal corporation.

RECITALS
A. Regional San and City are both signatory to the Master Interagency Agreement (MIA), last updated November 15, 2021 ;
B. Pursuant to the MlA,Regional San may agree to allow City to assume the responsibility of billing and collection of Regional San's sewer rates and sewer impact fees; and C. City wishes to bill and collect for Regional San Services provided within the Local Sewer Service Area pursuant to the terms contained herein.

D.

AGREEMENT
Now therefore, the parties agree as follows
Section 1. Definitions.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1 shall for all purposes of this Agreement have the meanings hereinafter specified:

AVOIDED COST: The estimated cost per account Regional San would have incurred to collect sewer rates in the portions of Regional San service area, which pursuant to this Agreement are collected by City.

CITY: The City of Folsom.

COMMERCIAL USER: Any nonresidential user that the District Engineer determines does not meet the definition of an industrial user as set forth in the Regional San's Consolidated Ordinance.

CONSOLIDATED ORDINANCE: An ordinance, originally adopted by Regional San on February 10, 2010 as Ordinance #SRSD-O109, and as subsequently amended, regulating the use of the Regional System and providing the authority to set and collect sewer rates and sewer impact fees.

DISTRICT ENGINEER: The chief executive of the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District.

INDUSTRIAL USER: Any person who discharges or causes a discharge of industrial wastewater Billingand CollectionAgreement 2lP a ge

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
directly or indirectly to the Regional System, as categorizedinthe Consolidated Ordinance. This term specifically includes any categorical users connected to the Regional System, whether or not they discharge process wastewater.

LOCAL SERVICES: All services within City that are necessary for the collection, conveyance, treatment, and transfer to the Regional System of wastewater originating within City that are not to be performed by Regional San pursuant to the MIA.

LOCAL SEWER SERVICE AREA: That area in which City has the exclusive authority to perform local sewer services.

MASTER INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT (MIA): An Agreement, last amended on November 15, 2021, and as subsequently amended, which specifies the responsibilities between Regional San, City and the other contributing agencies on the financing, operations and maintenance of wastewater collection, conveyance, treatment facilities, and collection of sewer rates and sewer impact fees.

OPERATING AGREEMENTS: All agreements between Regional San and City for the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities.

REGIONAL SAN: The Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District.

REGIONAL SAN SERVICES: All services required for the collection, conveyance, treatment, and discharge of wastewater that are to be performed by Regional San pursuant to the MIA.

REGIONAL SYSTEM: All facilities for the conveyance, treatment, and discharge of wastewater that are owned or operated by Regional San.

RESIDENTIAL USER: A user whose premises are used solely for nontransient human habitation.

SYSTEM: All facilities for the collection, conveyance, treatment, and discharge of wastewater owned or operated by Regional San or City, as indicated by the context in which it is used.

WASTEWATER: The liquid and water-carried industrial or domestic wastes from dwellings, commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and institutions, whether treated or untreated, which is contributed into or permitted to enter the Regional San's facilities. This also includes infiltration, inflow, and combined flow.

Section 2. Effective Date.

The effective date of this Agreement is _,2022
Billing and Collection Agreement 3lPage

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

Section 3.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
City Collection of Sewer Rates for Regional San Services.

Upon the effective date of this Agreement, City shall assume the responsibility of billing and collection of Regional San's sewer rates.

City will bill and collect monthly sewer rates for Regional San for residential and commercial users that conform to the schedule of user rates adopted by Regional San that is in effect upon the date of billing.

City will remit to Regional San sewer rate charges due for all accounts billed (collected or uncollected).

City shall periodically levy, bill, and use reasonable efforts to collect from delinquent accounts.

With respect to industrial users, Regional San shall be responsible for:
(a) Collecting all information needed to compute user sewer rates, (b) The computation of such sewer rates, and
(c) Periodically billing the computed Regional San sewer rates directly to the industrial user without regard to the user's location within the territorial jurisdiction of Regional San.

By mutual agreement, the charge for Regional San Services may be collected with the rates, tolls, and charges for local services or other utility services. If Regional San charges are collected with the rates, tolls, and charges of another utility, the Regional San charge shall be shown on the billing as such and shall not be combined with any other rate, toll, or charge appearing on the billing.

Adequate records for the collection of sewer rates and sewer impact fees shall be maintained by City to issuJpermits , differentiate between Regional San Services and local user charges, amounts received, and payments made to Regional San.

City shall establish and maintain a billing system for the collection of user charges for Regional San Services. The billing system must conform to the classification and categorization of sewer rates established and adopted by Regional San in its Consolidated Ordinance. The City shall establish, produce, and maintain adequate reports from its billing system for Regional San to veriff the billing and transfers of billed amounts are representative of the customer base being provided services.

Section 4. Payment of Sewer Rates and Sewer Impact Fees to Regional San.

City shall pay Regional San no later than 60 days following City's regular periodic billing a sum that equals the total of all sewer rates due for all accounts billed by City for Regional San Services in said billing period.

CiW shall pay Regional San a sum that equals the total of all sewer impact fees collected on no less than a quarterly basis.

Payments of all charges (sewer rates and sewer impact fees) shall be accompanied with a sunmary BillingandCollectionAgreement 4lP a ge

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
identification by billing categories that reconciles billings with payments. section 5. city collection of sewer Impact Fees for Regional san.

City shall provide such services as are necessary for collection, documentation, and transfer of such sewer impact fees without cost to Regional San'
City will bill and collect sewer impact fees for single-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings including duplexes.

Regional San will compute, bill, and collect sewer impact fees for commercial, industrial, and multi- family dwellings excluding duplexes.

Section 6. Reimbursement of Avoided Cost of Billing.

Regional San will reimburse City for Regional San's Avoided Cost of billing. The reimbursed amount shall be based on an average annual cost Regional San would have to pay to directly bill sewer rates.

Regional San may review the annual average cost per account and based on the review, the District Engineer has the authority to revise the reimbursement amount for Avoided Cost of billing.

The Avoided Cost of billing reimbursement remains in effect through the term of this Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement Regional San will reimburse the Avoided Cost of billing retroactively to City beginning November 15, 2021.

As an option, City can deduct reimbursement from sewer rate payments to Regional San. The number of accognts used by City to calculate the Avoided Cost reimbursement shall be from the beginning point of the remittance period and shown on the remittance payment to Regional San. City will prorate the average annual Avoided Cost based on the reimbursement period mutually agreed upon.

Section 7. Reimbursement of Unrecoverable Sewer Rates.

For billings on or after November 15, 2021, City may request reimbursement from Regional San, and Regional San will pay, for any sewer rate charges that have been determined to be ultimately unrecoverable. City must provide documentation for unrecoverable sewer rates to Regional San.

Section 8. Auditing Records.

Regional San shall have the authority to appoint auditors as it deems necessary to examine City's financial records to determine compliance with this Agreement. City shall make available to such auditors all requested records and will assist and cooperate with the auditors in their efforts. Types of required documentation include reasonable efforts to collect delinquent charges; details of uncollectable and n*.roverable charges; and account billing information by parcel along with classification of use of parcel, property addresses, and any changes in ownership of parcels.

Regional San shall have the authority to conduct field audits to verifu the accounts and billing BillingandCollectionAgreement 5lP a ge

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
periodically.

Regional San shall have the authority to request back verification of issues identified in previous audits to ensure that they were corrected.

When it is determined a previous error in billing occurred, City and Regional San will seek to correct errors as provided in the Regional San Consolidated Ordinance.

Section9. PerformanceExpectations.

Regional San acknowledges that all billing and collection cannot be without erors; however, due diligence that results in reasonably accurate billing and collection is required.

Regional San reserves the right to take over billing and collection of sewer rates and sewer impact fees if it determines in its sole discretion that City is not meeting performance expectations.

City shall provide the following services:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Retain and make available accurate records for parcels, classification of use of parcel, changes in use and ownership of parcel, addresses of properties and current billing information.

Cooperate and collaborate to reduce inaccuracies in billing and collection.

Provide records to auditors when requested.

Remit collected sewer rates and sewer impact fees at the agreed upon frequency.

Section 10. Historical Billing Data Submittal For Permit Services.

Current Regional San Consolidated Ordinance, Section 4.3.4 - Sewer Impact Fee Credits, states:

All credits are parcel based. As such they do not belong to a specific user but to the parcel.

Credits may not be transferred unless parcels are adjacent and have the same owner.

All Residential and Commercial Users that have paidfor their connection and use to Regional San's sewer system as of July l, 2001, will be grandfathered as to their existing use as of that date. As such these users ore subject to the payment of Incremental Sewer Impact Fees for any expansion beyond their JuIy I, 2001, usage. The Incremental Sewer Impact Fee will be based upon the dffirence between their July l, 2001, usage (credit) and the present usage Sewer Impact Fee requiredfor a totally new development of their type.

In order to comply with the intent of the Consolidated Ordinance, the City shall provide a one time historical billing data submittal that includes all Regional San billing information for all residential and commercial users that existed in City billing system as of July 1,2001.

The historical data submittal shall include, but not be limited to, the following account details:

Commercial Users: Assessor Parcel Number (APN); addresses of businesses; names of businesses; suite numbers; classification of commercial use and either the appropriate square footage, bed count, chair count, etc.; and equivalent family dwellings (ESDs) billed for the individual businesses/suites.

BillingandCollectionAgreement 6lP a ge

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
Residential Users: APN, addresses of residences, classification of use of the parcel (example; residential user or multi-family user), total ESDs billed per parcel.

Regional San recognizes that at this time the City does not have the technical capabilities to provide APNs linked to billing accounts; however, City is in process of updating its billing system to accommodate this request. City will make a reasonable effort to provide the APNs linked to billing accounts within ayear of this agreement being executed.

Section LL. Current Billing Data Submittal For Permit Services.

Current Regional San Consolidated Ordinance, Section 4.3.4 - Sewer Impact Fee Credits,states:

Additionally, changes in types of commercial usage may also require the payment of Incremental Sewer Impact Fees whenever the new usage exceeds the Sewer Impact Fee Credit grandfathered or previously purchased.

In order to comply with the intent of the Consolidated Ordinance, the City shall provide a current billing data submittal that includes all Regional San billing information for all residential and commercial users that exist in City billing system at the time this Agreement is executed.

The current data submittal shall include, but not be limited to, the following account details:

Commercial Users: APN; addresses of businesses; names of businesses; suite numbers; classification of commercial use and either the appropriate square footage, bed count, chair count, etc.; and ESDs billed for the individual businesses/suites.

Residential Users: APN, addresses of residences, classification of use of the parcel (example; residential user or multi-family user), and total ESDs billed per parcel.

Regional San recognizes that at this time the City does not have the technical capabilities to provide APNs linked to billing accounts; however, City is in process of updating its billing system to accommodate this request. City will make a reasonable effort to provide the APNs linked to billing accounts within ayear of the Effective Date of this Agreement.

Section 12. Updates to Current Billing Data Submittal X'or Permit Services.

The City shall submit updates to the Current Billing Data Submittal (Section 11) on a weekly basis or mutually agreed upon frequency for any billing accounts that have changed.

Section 13. Datzto Determine Converting New Fee Area to Infill Fee Area.

On an annual basis (first day of June), City will provide Regional San with atable that includes APN and ESD billing data for all parcels. This data will be used by Regional San to determine when the New Fee Area reaches 70%o of cowrected ESD growth and considered with the percentage of connected acreage. Portions of the New Fee Area can be changed to the Infill Fee Area as defined in the Regional San Consolidated Ordinance.

Billing and Collection Agreement TlPage

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
Regional San recognizes that at this time the City does not have the technical capabilities to provide APNs linked to billing accounts; however, City is in process of updating its billing system to accommodate this request. City will make a reasonable effort to provide the APNs linked to billing accounts within ayear.

Section 14. Delayed Payments.

Whenever any party to this Agreement shall have failed to make any payment required of it by the provisions of this Agreement on or before the date provided for such payment, such party shall pay, in addition to said payment, interest thereon at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum for and during the period of such delay. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to authorize or condone any delay in making any such payments.

Section 15. Notice.

Notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall be sufficiently given to aparty if in writing and if either served personally upon or mailed by registered or certified mail to the clerk of its governing body.

Section 16. Amendments to the Agreement.

Modifications and amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by all parties.

Additionally, this Agreement may be amended if there are amendments or revisions to the MIA that are related to the billing and collection language.

Section 17. Term of Agreement.

This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by Regional San in writing.

Section 1.8. Transition Period.

Upon termination of this Agreement by Regional San, a reasonable transition period shall be in effect until City has exchanged the information needed to accommodate the transfer of billing and collection services to Regional San.

This Agreement remains in full effect during the transition period.

Section 19. Successors and Assigns.

It is mutually agreed by all the parties hereto that the agreements, covenants, conditions, limitations, BillingandCollectionAgreement 8lP a ge

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

I
DCS Contract No. 50000228
restrictions, and undertakings herein contained shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto as if they were in all cases named.

Section20. Mutuallndemnification.

No party to this Agreement nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by any other party to this Agreement under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to said other party under this Agreement. It isalso understood and agreed that, pursuant to California Government Code Section 895.4, each party to this Agreement shall fully indemniff and hold each other party to this Agreement harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by California Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by said indemnifring party under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to said party under this Agreement.

Section 21. Document Precedence.

In the event of a conflict between any of the agreements or ordinances listed below, the following sequence govems, with each agreement or ordinance superior to the agreement or ordinance listed thereafter.

This Agreement
The Master Interagency Agreement
Regional San Consolidated Ordinance
Operating Agreements
Other agreements between Regional San and City
(STGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)

2. J.

4. 5.

Billing and Collection Agreement 9lPage

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
IN WITNESS WHEREOX', the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed.

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT, a county sanitation
district pursuant to and operating under the
authority of the County Sanitation District Act,
commencing at Health and Safety Code section
4700
By:

Christoph Dobson, District Engineer
Date:

Areement Approved by the Board of Directors
with Authority Delegated to the District
Engineer to execute the Agreement on behalf
of REGIONAL SAN.

Agenda Date:

Item Number:

Resolution No.:

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: Date
Krista C. Whitman
Assista nt County Cou nsel
Prepared by:

Billing and Collection Agreement l0 lPage

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

DCS Contract No. 50000228
CITY OF FOLSOM, A Municipal Corporation:

Date
ATTEST:

Elaine Andersen, City Manager
FUNDING AVAILABLE:

Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Date Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director Date Steven W*g, City Attorney Date NOTICE: SIGNATURE(S) ON BEHALF OF CONSULTANT MUST BE NOTARIZED.

A certificate of acknowledgment in accordance with the provisions of California Civil Code section I 189 must be attached for each person executing this agreement on behalf of consultant. This section provides, at part (b): "Any certificate of acknowledgment taken in another place shall be sufficient in this state if it is taken in accordance with the laws of the place where the acknowledgment is made.

Billing and Collection Agreement 11 lPage

09/13/2022 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Fire Department recommends that the City Council move and adopt Resolution No. 1 091 5 - A Resolution Authorizinglhe City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for Two Type 1 Fire Engines from Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. and Appropriation of Funds

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Fire engines are the front line vehicles used by the Fire Department to carry hose, water, tools, and the pump to extinguish fires. The Fire Department requires a replacement Type 1 fire engine for Station 38 and an additional Type 1 fire engine for Station 34. These purchases were approved in the Fire Department Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget and the Folsom Plan Area Capital Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget. These fire engines will take approximately 24 months to build with an estimated delivery date of August2024. One fire engine will replace City Vehicle # 1036 (2006 Pierce Arrow XT) and the other will be an addition to the Fire Department fleet inventory.

Staff is recommending that the City of Folsom enter into a cooperative purchase agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. of Sacramento, California using the Houston-Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program (HGACBuy) to purchase two Type 1 fire engines. The total price to purchase these fire engines is $2,002,505.12. 1 MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10915 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for Two Type 1 Fire Engines from Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Fire Department

09/13/2022 Item No.9.

POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code. Section 2.36.170, Cooperative Purchasing, describes the procedures to enter into a cooperative purchase agreement with another public agency for the procurement of supplies, equipment, or service.

Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
The Fire Department currently staffs four Type 1 fire engines daily. One Type I engine is maintained at Station 35 as a ready reserve, and two additional Type I fire engines are maintained as mechanical reserves. The City of Folsom replaces fleet based on age and maintenance costs.

The Fire Department has conducted extensive research and determined that cooperative purchase through the HGACBuy would provide the City of Folsom with the best product at the best price. HGACBuy has for 30 years assisted local government members nationally in reducing competitive bid costs associated with procuring products and services. There are several Califomia municipalities who participate in the HGACBuy program. They include the Cities of Auburn, Roseville, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento, Vacaville, and Woodland. The County of Sacramento and the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District are also participants in the program.

Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. has been awarded a contract through HGACBuy to supply fire apparatus on behalf of Pierce Manufacturing Inc. The City of Folsom will save an additional 5Yo over the lowest bid price that Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. can offer by utilizing HGACBuy. The City Attorney's office has reviewed the HGACBuy process and determined its use to be consistent with City Policy
This purchase would replace our oldest in-service engine and add one additional engine to our fleet. These engines would be a Type 1, full size fire engine. They would be equipped with seating for four, a five-hundred-gallon water tank, a 1,500 gallon per minute pump, and all required equipment. They would respond as an in-service apparatus on medical aids, public assists, structure fires, fire alarms, andhazardous materials incidents. 2 Page 66
09/13/2022 Item No.9.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget includes $950,000 in the General Fund (Fund 010) for the purchase of the fire engine to be housed at Station 35, and $1,535,000 was included in the Folsom Plan Area Impact Fund (Fund 472) for fire apparatus for Station 34. Both appropriations include the necessary standard equipment.

The General Fund will require an additional appropriation in the amount of $51,253 for a total appropriation for the Type 1 engine of $ I ,001 ,253. Staff is proposing to appropriate $5 1 ,253 from the Capital Replacement Fund (Fund 602),there are sufficient funds available.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review.

ATTACHMENTS
1 Resolution No. I 091 5 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for two Type 1 fire engines from Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,
J
Two (2) Velocity PUC Type I Fire Engines sr.794.536.42
(HGAC contract number FS12-19, CODE FSl9VC08)
Discount For 100% Pre-Payment at Time of Order $94,834.30 Fire Fiehting Equipment $128J90.44
Performance Bond $4,305.38
One (1) Factory Inspection Trip $13,456.00
Delivery I Dealer Preparation $12,800.00
Total Apparatus Cost $1,858,453.94
Sales Tax @7.75%
California Tire Fee
$144,030.18
$21.00
Total Ensine Cost to Citv of Folsom $2,002,505.12
Ken Cusano, Fire Chief

09/13/2022 Item No.9.

RESOLUTION NO. 10915

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH GOLDEN STATE FIRE APPARATUS INC. FOR TWO TYPE 1 FIRE ENGINES FROM GOLDEN STATE FIRE APPARATUS INC. AND

APPROPRIATION OF T'UNDS
WHEREAS' the Fire Department staff has completed extensive research and validated the need to acquire an additional Type I fire engine; and replace an aging Type 1 fire engine; and WHEREAS' two Type 1 fire engines were approved in the Fire Department Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budgets; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed and recommended participation in a cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston-Galveston Area Council utilizing Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc., for purchase ofa new fire engine to ensure purchase ofthe best product at the best price; and WHEREAS, staff complied with the provisions of Folsom Municipal Code Section

2.36.170; and,
WHEREAS, Golden State Fire Apparatus will manufacture, supply, and deliver two Type 1 fire engines meeting the Fire Department's specifications for a total sum of $2,002,505.12; and WHEREAS, an additional appropriation will be required in the General Fund (Fund 010) for the Type I engine that will be housed at Station 35 in the amount of $51,253; and WHEREAS' sufftcient funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 602) for the additional appropriation which will be a transfer to the General Fund; and WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds budgeted and available in the Folsom Plan Area Improvement Fund (Fund 472) for the Type I engine for Station 34 in the amount of $ 1 ,001 ,253; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a purchase agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc., for two Type 1 fire engines from Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc., in the amount of $2,002,505.72.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate an additional $51,253 in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Replacement Fund (Fund 602) as a transfer to the General Fund (Fund 010) and as an additional appropriation in the Fire Department FY 2022-23 Operating Budget.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of September 2022, by the following roll-call Resolution No. 10915
Page I of2 Page 68
09/13/2022 Item No.9.
vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 10915
Page2 of2 Page 69
09/13/2022 Item No.9.

This page is intentionally treft blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.9.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Resolution No. 10916 - A Resolution Authorizing an Application for the SACOG 2022 Green Means Go Funding Program for Infrastructure and Planning Activities Associated with the Development of 300 Persifer Street

2. Resolution 10917 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City's Allocation of $800,000 in Home Funds Received Through Participation in the SHRA HOME Consortium to Habitat for Humanity for the Construction of 10 Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street
1 MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Grant Funds Associated with Development of Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street

1. Resolution No. 10916- A Resolution Authorizing an
Application for the SACOG 2022 Green Means Go
Funding Program for Infrastructure and Planning
Activities Associated with the Development of 300
Persifer Street

2. ResolutionNo. 10917 - A Resolution of the City of
Folsom Authorizing the City's Allocation of $800,000 in Home Funds Received Through Participation in the
SHRA HOME Consortium to Habitat for Humanity for
the Construction of l0 Affordable Housing Units at 300
Persifer Street
FROM: Community Development Department

09/13/2022 Item No.10.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On December 14,2021 and in compliance with the State's Surplus Land Act, the City Council approved the sale of surplus land located at 300 Persifer Street to Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento, Inc. for the purpose of developing affordable housing. The 0.91-acre Persifer Street site is located on the northeast corner of Persifer Street and Coloma Street as shown on the exhibit below.

Through the good faith negotiation process, the following terms were settled upon:
l. The vacant surplus property will be subdivided by the City into five individual residential lots in keeping with the historic Theodore Judah lotting pattern each with 7,000 square foot lot size, 50-foot lot width, and 140-foot lot depth.

2. The vacant surplus property will be sold to Habitat for a total sum of $10,000 for the purpose ofcreating at least one for-sale affordable housing unit on each ofthe five lots, with an additional smaller secondary or accessory dwelling unit on each lot along the adjoining alley consistent with local zoning and State housing law.

3. Transfer of ownership of the Property to Habitat is subject to Habitat entering into a Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to ensure affordability of the units for 55 years as required by law.

4. The City will support Habitat's efforts to secure future grant funding and/or fee reductions for off-site infrastructure improvements, design, and permitting.

POLICY / RULE
Financial support of affordable housing projects is consistent with the Crty's Housing Element Goal of facilitating affordable housing.

ANALYSIS
As indicated in the background section of this report, part of the property sale negotiations included city support efforts to assist Habitat in securing future grant funding and/or fee 2 Page 72
09/13/2022 Item No.10.
reductions for infrastructure improvements, design, and permiuing associated with the project.

Over the last several months, staff and Habitat have identified two promising grant opportunities:

1. Sacramento Area Council of Government (SACOG) 2022 Early Activation Green Means Go grant; and

2. Federal HOME funds grant from Sacramento Housing Redevelopment Agency (sHRA).

Grant Analysis
Grant #1 - SACOG Green Means Go Early Activation Grant - The 2022 Green Means Go program is designed to fund non-transportation infrastructure and planning that accelerates infill housing within locally adopted Green Zones and supports housing affordability. Eligible project sponsors (i.e., lead applicants) are the 22 cities and six counties within the SACOG region; however, partnerships between lead agencies and other public agencies, nonprofits, or community groups are highly encouraged. There are three competitive grant categories associated with this funding: Early Activation, Planning, and Capital. City staff and the Habitat team have identified the first category, Early Activation, as a great opportunity to apply for funding some of the Project's non-transportation infrastructure and design planning. The $3 million Early Activation category (Category A) is designed to fund either planning and/or infrastructure activities that accelerate infill residential development in the near term (grant funds must be expended by October 2024). Furthermore, project scopes submitted to this Early Activation category must be for specific non-transportation (defined as water, wastewater, stormwater, electricity/dry utilities, and/or broadband) infrastructure components and can include site-specific activities. Based on Habitat's most recent Project budget, approximately $550,000 in non-transportation infrastructure costs and $105,000 in planning design costs would be eligible to receive this grant funding. In addition, because the storm drain in the alley adjacent to the project site is not to current standards and results in a conflict with standard sewer ties-ins for the project, staff also proposes to request an additional $40,000 for a hydraulic analysis and evaluation of the existing storm drain system to identi$ any necessary improvements to resolve potential sewer tie-in issues for the project and bring the storm drain system up to current standards. With City Council's authorization, staff will submit a timely Green Means Go application to SACOG in an amount not to exceed $750,000 (non- transportation infrastructure costs, planning design costs, storm drain/hydraulic study costs, planning design costs, and a 5%o coftingency allowance and rounded to the nearest $50,000).

The grant application has a due date of September 15,2022, and all grant funds must be fully expended by October 2024.

Grant #2 - HOME - The Federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) provides grants to fund a wide range of activities including construction, acquisition, andlor rehabilitation of affordable housing. SHRA administers these funds on Sacramento County's behalf as an entitlement jurisdiction. The County of Sacramento is part of a HOME Consortium, which allows local governments that would not otherwise quali$ for federal funding to join with other contiguous units of local government to directly participate in the HOME program.

J Page 73
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

The Cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, Isleton, Galt, and Rancho Cordova are members of the County of Sacramento's HOME Consortium.

Four affordable housing projects in Folsom previously received HOME funds. These projects include Mercy Village Folsom, Creekview Manor Senior Apartments, Forestwood Apartments and Bidwell Oaks Apartments. In addition, the Sage Senior apartment project, which is currently under construction, received HOME funding approval in202l, however, because the developer later was able to secure Tax Credit funding, the developer withdrew the request to receive the HOME funds and therefore these funds are still available for a Folsom affordable housing project.

In order to meet the September 1, 2022 application deadline, Habitat submitted a timely application to SHRA for $800,000 in HOME funds as the only currently qualified project in the City of Folsom. If awarded, the total $800,000 amount includes a forward commitment of the City's HOME funding allocation through 2025. Given constraints associated with this funding, few projects quali$ for these funds. Habitat is uniquely qualified and well positioned for the funding in the current multi-year cycle. SHRA supports this project and intends to take this request to the SHRA Board and the County Board of Supervisors for consideration and action in early 2023.

Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize both grant opportunities (SACOG Green Means Go and HOME funds), presented in Resolution No. 10916 and Resolution No. 10917.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Neither of the grant applications require a financial match. For the SACOG Green Means Go granl, the project would receive funding initially through the City Housing Fund (Fund 238) and the city would be reimbursed by the Green Means Go Grants Program funds in accordance with the reimbursement schedule. As such, an appropriation up to $750,000 would be required.

For the HOME grant, funding would be provided to Habitat directly from SHRA.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15194 (Affordable Housing Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 10916 - A Resolution Authorizing an Application for the SACOG 2022 Green Means Go Funding Program for Infrastructure and Planning Activities Associated with the Development of 300 Persifer Street

2. Resolution 10917 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City's Allocation of $800,000 in Home Funds Received Through Participation in the SHRA HOME Consortium to Habitat for Humanity for the Construction of 10 Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street
4 Page 74
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
5 Page 75
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

Attachment I
Resolution 10916 - A Resolution Authorizing an Application for the SACOG 2022 Green Means Go Funding Program for lnfrastructure and Planning Activities Associated with the Development of 300 Persifer Street

09/13/2022 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. 10916
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SACOG 2022 GREEN

MEANS GO FUNDING PROGRAM FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF 3OO PERSIFER STREET WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity of the proposed Persifer Street Affordable Housing project, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Persifer Street and Coloma Street, is in the process of securing the majority of funding necessary to build the 1O-unit 100% affordable housing project in which units will be affordable to low income households; and WHEREAS, providing financial assistance to affordable housing projects is consistent with the Goal H-3: Facilitating Affordable Housing in the City's Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City (as a lead agency) is eligible to apply for the Sacramento Area Council of Government (SACOG) 2022 Green Means Go Early Activation grant for non- transportation infrastructure and planning activities that accelerate infill housing within locally adopted Green Zones and supports housing affordability: and WHEREAS, partnerships between lead agencies and other public agencies, nonprofits, or community groups are highly encouraged; and WHEREAS, based on Habitat's most recent budget for the Persifer Street project, approximately $550,000 in non-transportation infrastructure costs and $105,000 in planning design costs would be eligible to receive this grant fundings; and WHEREAS, staff also proposes to request an additional $40,000 for a hydraulic analysis and evaluation of the existing storm drain system to identi$ any necessary improvements to bring the storm drain system adjacentto the project site up to current standards; and WHEREAS, the total combined funding request is an amount up to $750,000, with no city match required; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15194 (Affordable Housing Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the application to the Sacramento Area Council of Government for the 2022 Green Means Go Funding Grant for eligible infrastructure and planning activities associated with the development of 300 Persifer Street.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit
AYES: Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 10916
Page I of2 Page 77
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10916
Page2 of2 Page 78
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

Attachment2
Resolution No. 10917 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City's Allocation of $800,000 in Home Funds Received Through Participation in the SHRA HOME Consortium to Habitat for Humanity for the Construction of 10 Affordable Housing Units at 300 Persifer Street

09/13/2022 Item No.10.

RE,SOLUTION NO. IO9I7

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF'FOLSOM AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ALLOCATTON OF $800,000IN HOME FUNDS RECEIVED THROUGH

PARTICIPATION IN THE SHRA HOME CONSORTIUM TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 10 AFF'ORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AT 3OO PERSIFER STREET
WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity of the proposed 300 Persifer Affordable Housing project, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Persifer Street and Coloma Street, is in the process of securing the majority of funding necessary to build the l0-unit I00% affordable housing project in which units will be affordable to low income households; and WHEREAS, providing financial assistance to affordable housing projects is consistent with the Goal H-3: Facilitating Affordable Housing in the City's Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City is allocated HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funding annually or through a three-year cycle by the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) HOME Consortium for the purpose of supporting low- income housing creation; and
WHEREAS, Habitat has submitted a HOME application to SHRA requesting a $800,000 commitment of the Crty's HOME allocation to the project which includes a forward commitment of and will utilize the City's Home funds through 2025; and WHEREAS' Habitat's request for a grant of $800,000 in HOME funds is appropriate given project costs and development fees; and
WHEREAS, funding for the requested affordable housing grant will not impact the City's General Fund; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15194 (Affordable Housing Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City of Folsom does hereby authorize commitment of $800,000 in HOME funds received through SHRA to Habitat of Humanity of Greater Sacramento to construct the affordable housing project at 300 Persifer Street.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmember(s)
NOES: Councilmember(s)
Resolution No. 10917
Page I of2 Page 80
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

ATTEST
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10917
Page2 of2 Page 81
09/13/2022 Item No.10.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.10.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10918 - A Resolution Authorizing and Accepting a Grant Award from the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and California Office of Emergency Services for the Implementation of the City of Folsom Defensible Space and Vegetation Management Plan F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapproveResolutionNo. 10918-AResolutionAuthorizing and Accepting a Grant Award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and California Office of Emergency Services for the Implementation of the City of Folsom Defensible Space and Vegetation Management Plan

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On June l2th,2018, the Folsom City Council approved Resolution No. 10137 A Resolution Authorizing the Application for Grant Funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for the Folsom Defensible Space and Vegetation Management Plan. City staff has since taken part in working with both California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to identiff and clarifu the areas to receive treatment, identifu sensitive and protected species, and coordinate administrative tasks. On June 23'd,2022, Staff was made aware of the approval of our grant application and was provided the Subapplicantion Approval / Post-Obligation Document Package checklist of which this resolution is a requirement of. 1 POLICY / RULE

09/13/2022 Item No.11.

Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYS$
The City of Folsom Hazard Identification Assessment, a part of the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), has found the probability of future occuffences of wildfire is "Likely," with a "Critical," magnitude. According to the Cal-Fire Fire Threat Data, Folsom contains areas with "High" and "Very High" fire threat classes. A wildfire within the City could lead to the evacuation of large portions of the population and the potential foq significant loss of personal property, structures, and rangeland. With a total population of approximately 79,584, roughly 57%o of Folsom's residents have been identified to be at moderate to very high wildfire risk.

There are also multiple critical facilities in Folsom that intersect a fire threat zone in the moderate to very high areas, as determined by the Cal-Fire Fire Threat Data map. These facilities include elderly residential care facilities, public schools, acute care hospitals, public safety and government facilities, and a prison. For this grant project, the City of Folsom proposes to create a 30-to-100-foot defensible space around structures that are in or adjacent to City-owned properties, and will consist of abating annual grasses, the thinning and limbing of trees and bushes, and the removal or chipping of dead or downed trees. Focus areas will be within the perimeter of City-owned properties and areas adjacent to structures or critical infrastructure.

The grant project must be completed by June 16rh,2025.

AL REVIEW
Part of the grant award process for FEMA was to conduct an environmental review, their Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) is included below:

FEMA has determined that the Proposed Action is covered by the Region IX Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Recurring Actions in Arizona, Califomia, and Nevada (PEA) under Section 2.5.1, Mechanical or Hand Clearing of Vegetation. This category covers the implementation of the above project elements and, therefore, the Proposed Action is consistent with this PEA category.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Per the City of Folsom's application this grant is reimbursable for a 75125 match. Upon completion of FEMA's review, it was deemed that the City is eligible for a maximum federal grant award of $279,000 with a match obligation of $93,000 for a total project value of $372,000. Funding for the match was allocated in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 General Fund (Fund 010) Operating Budget in the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget as the City's match obligation.
2 Page 84
09/13/2022 Item No.11.

The remainder of the project costs and the grant revenue that will occur beyond Fiscal Year 2022-23 will be appropriated in future years during the budget process.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10918 - A Resolution Authorizing and Accepting a Grant Award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and California Office of Emergency Services for the Implementation of the City of Folsom Defensible Space and Vegetation Management Plan
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione,
Parks & Recreation Director
J Page 85
09/13/2022 Item No.11.

RESOLUTION NO. 10918

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S HAZARD MITIGATION

GRANT PROGRAM AND CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMEREGENCY SERVICES

FOR THE IMPLIMENTATION OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM DEFENSIBLE SPACE

AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, on June l2th, 2018, the City Council of the City of Folsom approved Resolution 10137 - A Resolution Authorizing The Application For Grant Funds From The Federal Emergency Management Agency'sHazard Mitigation Grant Program For The Folsom Defensible Space And Vegetation Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 23'd 2022 the City of Folsom was notified of the approval of the grant application; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom is eligible to receive upto $279,000 in federal grant funds through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and Califomia Office of Emergency Services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom's match to the grant is $93,000, which was allocated and included in the approved budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 in the General Fund (Fund 010) in the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the City of Folsom accepts the grant award from FEMA and CalOES, authorizes the City Manager or their designee to execute for and on behalf of the City of Folsom a public entity established under the laws of the State of California.

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby

1. Approves the acceptance of a grant award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's HazardMitigation Grant Program in the amount of $279,000.

2. Appoints the Parks and Recreation Department Director, as agent of the City of Folsom to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this l3th day of September 2022 by the following roll-call vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Resolution No.l09l8
Page I of2
Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

09/13/2022 Item No.11.

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

ATTEST:

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No.10918
Page2 of2 Page 87
09/13/2022 Item No.11.

This page is intentionally left blank"

09/13/2022 Item No.11.

I i:.1 '-.:;i'r'i
t 1,!ir:i-.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10911 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Proclaiming Termination of COVID- 19 Local Emergency.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Following proclamation of a state of emergency by Califomia's Governor on March4,2020 and Sacramento County's Public Health Officer on March 5,202Q (ratified by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors on March 10,2020), the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 10408 and proclaimed the existence of a local emergency due to conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property in the City caused by the rapid spread of COVID- 1 9 in Sacramento County and throughout the State of California.

Following a review of the proclamation of the COVID-19 local emergency at its regular meeting on August 23,2022, the City Council directed staff to bring an action item at this Council meeting to terminate the local emergency.

POLICY / RULE
The California Emergency Services Act and the Folsom Municipal Code empower the City Council to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity. The City Council shall proclaim termination of the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant per Folsom Municipal Code Secti on 2.28.040(A).
1 MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: Old Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1091 1- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Proclaiming Termination of COVID-l9 Local Emergency
FROM: City Manager's Office

09/13/2022 Item No.12.

ANALYSIS
Since the declarations of public health emergency in2020, advancement in medical treatment, vaccination, and public health protocols have reduced the transmission, severity, and deadliness of COVID-l9 to Folsom residents.

Terminating the local emergency will also terminate all seven Emergency Orders issued by the City's Director of Emergency Services (City Manager). The City Council has directed staff that the termination of the local emergency shall coincide with the expiration of the California COVID-I9 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave on September 30, 2022. The proposed Resolution, therefore, terminates the COVID-I9 local emergency effective October 1,2022.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
Terminating the proclamation of the COVID-I9 local emergency has no impact on the Crty's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10911 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Proclaiming Termination of COVID-l9 Local Emergency
Respectfu lly submitted,
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
) Page 90
09/13/2022 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. 10911

A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAMING TERMINATION OF COVID-l9 LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a State of Emergency in Califomia as a result of the rapid spread of a respiratory illness caused by novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-I 9); and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2020, the Sacramento County Public Health Officer proclaimed a public health emergency in Sacramento County due to the threat to public health and safety from COVID-l9; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors ratified the County's Proclamation of Local Public Health Emergency on March 10,2020; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 10408 and proclaimed the existence of a local emergency due to conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property in the City caused by the rapid spread of COVID-I9 in Sacramento County and throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, since the declarations of public health emergency in2020, advancement in medical treatment, vaccination, and public health protocols have reduced the transmission, severity, and deadliness of COVID-19 to Folsom residents; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the conditions of extreme peril previously posed by COVID-I9 no longer exist in the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom proclaiming that the COVID-I9 local emergency in the City of Folsom shall be terminated as of October 1,2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this l3th day of September 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10911
Page I of I
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR

09/13/2022 Item No.12.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.12.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council introduce and conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 1332 - An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adding Chapter 12.25, "Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit", to the Folsom Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use of Parking Space on City Streets and City-owned Public Properties for Outdoor Dining

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Following proclamation by the State and the County of the COVID-I9 public health emergency, the Folsom City Council proclaimed a local emergency caused by the rapid spread of COVID-19 in Sacramento County and throughout California.

The City's Director of Emergency Services (City Manager) issued Emergency Order DES- 04-20 on May 1,2020 which included, among other things, permission for temporary use of certain City-owned public properties for outdoor dining until termination of the local emergency. Thereafter, several restaurants in the City fronting public streets with on-street parking obtained temporary permits to use designated on-street parking areas (the "parklets") as well as City-owned public property for outdoor dining.

Following a review of the proclamation of the COVID-19 local emergency on August 23, 2022, the City Council directed staff to bring an action item to this Council meeting to terminate the local emergency but keep the temporary outdoor dining permit process in place 1 MEETING DATE: 91t312022
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1332 - An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adding Chapter 12.25, ooTemporary Outdoor Dining Permit", to the Folsom Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use of
Parking Space on City Streets and City-owned Public Properties for Outdoor Dining (Introduction and First Reading)
FROM: Community Development Department

09/13/2022 Item No.13.

POLICY / RULE
The City Council has authority to enact or repeal ordinances pursuant to Section 2.12(A) of the Folsom City Charter.

ANALYSIS
For over two years since allowing temporary use of parking spaces on City streets and City- owned public properties for outdoor dining, the City has received no complaint except one recently where an individual brought to the City's attention that the 'opatklet" outdoor dining areas lack ADA accessibility. The City promptly notified all permittees to review and evaluate ADA accessibility in their parklet areas under the permit condition prohibiting interference with access under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The proposed Ordinance will make the temporary outdoor dining permit on City Streets and City-owned public properties process permanent in the Folsom Municipal Code and not dependent on the COVID-19 local emergency. The following are'some of the key provisions for the Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit:

1. Permit valid for 12 months and may be renewed

2. Permit requires approval of an encroachment permit

3. Permit not transferrable to another location

4. Permit subject to cancelation with written determination of danger or noncompliance by Community Development Director

5. Permittee required to provide liability insurance and indemnity to City The permit application will be reviewed and evaluated by the Community Development Department, in consultation with the Public Works Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Fire Department and Police Department, for suitability of using the proposed on-street parking space or City-owned public property for outdoor dining. Upon receiving necessary plans submitted with the application, City staff will work collaboratively with the applicant to make the outdoor dining area safe and enjoyable for everyone.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City Council will utilize the Site Design Review fee previously adopted by City Council Resolution for the Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit. The financial impact on the Crty's general fund will be negligible.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(bX3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review ) Page 94
09/13/2022 Item No.13.

ATTACHMENT
Ordinance No. 1332 - An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adding Chapter 12.25, 'oTemporary Outdoor Dining Permit", to the Folscim Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use of Parking Space on City Streets and City-owned Public Properties for Outdoor Dining (Introduction and First Reading)
Respectfully submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
J Page 95
09/13/2022 Item No.13.

ORDINANCE NO. 1332

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF'FOLSOM
ADDING CHAPTER 12.25, (TEMPORARY OUTDOOR DINING PERMIT',,

TO THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TEMPORARY USE OF PARIilNG SPACE ON CITY STREETS AND CITY-OWNED PUBLIC PROPERTIES

FOR OUTDOOR DINING
The City Council of the City of Folsom does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Ordinance is to allow temporary use of parking space on City street and City-owned public property for outdoor dining by adding Chapter 12.25, "Temporary Outdoor Dining Permif', to the Folsom Municipal Code.

SECTION 2 ADDITION TO CODE
Chapter 12.25 is hereby added to the Folsom Municipal Code to read as follows:

Chapter 12.25
Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit
Sections:

12.25.0r0

12.25.020

12.25.030

12.25.040

12.25.050
Temporary use of parking space on city street and city-owned public property for outdoor dining.

Permit required.

Permit not transferable.

Modification or cancelation of permit.

Insurance and indemnity.

12.25.010 Temporary use of parking space on city street and city-owned public property for outdoor dining.

A. Restaurants desiring to use parking space on City street or City-owned public property for outdoor dining may apply for a Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit from the Community Development Department.

B. If approved through issuance of a Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit under this Chapter, the use of parking space on City street or City-owned public property for outdoor dining shall be temporary and subject to modification or cancelation by the City at any time with notice to the permittee.

Ordinance No. 1332
Page I of5 Page 96
09/13/2022 Item No.13.

C. No real property interest or right is provided, given, or otherwise conveyed to any person or entity using parking space on City street or City-ownedpublic property for outdoor dining under this Chapter.

D. The use of parking space on City street or City-owned public property for outdoor dining shall not interfere with vehicular and pedestrian traffic, or access under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

12.25.020 Permit required.

A. No outdoor dining in parking space on City street or City-owned public property shall be allowed without a valid Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit.

B. The permit application shall be on a form prescribed by the Community Development Department and shall include necessary plans and supporting materials of the proposed location and layout and any information deemed necessary by the Department to determine compliance with applicable building and fire codes and accessibihty requirements.

C. The permit application shall be deemed incomplete without payment of a non-refundable permit fee (Site Design Review fee) established by resolution of the City Council.

D. All Temporary Outdoor Dining Permits also require approval of an Encroachment Permit and payment of applicable fee adopted by resolution of the City Council.

E. The Community Development Department shall, in consultation with the Public Works Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Fire Department and Police Department determine the suitability and appropriateness of the proposed use of parking space on City street or City- owned public property requested by the restaurant for outdoor dining.

F. The permittee shall comply with the requirements of this Chapter and all conditions specified in the permit.

G. Temporary fencing not exceeding 3 feet tall to separate the outdoor dining area from vehicular and pedestrian traffic shall be placed in a safe manner around the outdoor dining area.

Exceptions may be granted for taller fencing if required by other outside agency such as Alcohol and Beverage Control (ABC).

H. No permanent item or structure may be installed on City streets or City-owned public property.

I. Permittee shall comply with all applicable State and County laws and regulations pertaining to outdoor dining, including but not limited to sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages.

Ordinance No. 1332

09/13/2022 Item No.13.

J. Permit issued under this Chapter is temporary, modifiable and cancelable at arry time upon notice to the permittee, valid for 12 months upon issuance unless canceled, and renewable subject to verification of compliance of the permit conditions by the Community Development Department. Application for a Temporary Outdoor Dining Permit and Encroachment Permit is required for permit renewal, along with payment of applicable permit fees.

K. The use permitted under this Chapter shall cease upon cancelation of the permit, and the permittee shall return public property to the condition existing at the time of permit issuance within seven calendar days ofreceiving cancelation notice.

L. For purpose of this Chapter, 'opermittee" shall include the person or entity receiving the permit and the restaurant entity, business, or organization operating under the permit.

12.25.030 Permitnottransferable.

Permits issued pursuant to this Chapter are not transferable to another location.

12.25.040 Modification or cancelation of permit.

A. The Community Development Director may modi$ conditions imposed on permits issued under this Chapter with notice to the permittee.

B. The Community Development Director may cancel any permit issued under this Chapter for the following reasons:

1. Failure to comply with any condition imposed on the permit.

2. Failure to comply with any provision under this Chapter.

3. The outdoor dining has been conducted in a manner contrary to the application and approval granted in the permit.

4. The outdoor dining operation poses a danger orhazardto vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or the public, or interferes with access under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

5. The permittee or his/herlits employees or agents have failed to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, or regulations in connection with the outdoor dining operation.

6. The applicant has knowingly made a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted a material fact in the application.

C. The Director's determination to cancel the permit shall be in writing, setting forth the reasons for said determination.

Ordinance No. 1332

09/13/2022 Item No.13.

12.25.050 Insuranceandindemnity.

A. The permittee shall maintain in full force and effect, at its sole cost and expense, commercial general liability insurance coverage for claims of bodily injury and property damage liability not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and provide the City with an additional insured endorsement and primary and non-contributory endorsement naming the City of Folsom and its officers, agents and employees as additional insured.

B. The permittee shall protect, defend, indemniff, save and hold the City and its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, or causes of action for death or injury to persons, or damage to property resulting from intention or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the permittee or its employees, contractors, and agents, or from any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct, negligent acts, or omissions of the permittee or its employees, contractors, or agents, or by the permittee's operation under the permit.

SECTION 3 SCOPE
Except as set forth in this Ordinance, all other provisions of the Folsom Municipal Code shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 4 NO MANDATORY DUTY OF CARE
This Ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care towards persons and property within or without the City, so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

SECTION 5 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness,of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council declares that it would have passed each section irrespective of the factthatany one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 6 EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in full or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

Ordinance No. 1332

09/13/2022 Item No.13.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on September 13, 2022 andthe second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on September 27, 2022.

On a motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this2Tth day of September 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1332

09/13/2022 Item No.13.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL_AEIIQII
Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction regarding potential modifications to the City's Cardroom Ordinance (FMC, Chapter 5.20 Cardrooms) including but not limited to increases in the number of permitted card tables in any cardroom and allowing for the practice of Backline Betting in any cardroom.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Legal gambling establishments, popularly referred to as cardrooms, have existed in California since the 1850s, and for the majority of that time, regulation of cardroom activities was left almost exclusively to local governments. The Folsom City Council formally began regulating cardrooms in 1988 with the approval of Ordinance No. 618, which enacted Chapter

5.20 Cardrooms of the Folsom Municipal Code.

Control of cardrooms began to shift to the State of California in 1995 when the Legislature enacted a 5-year moratorium that restricted the licensing of new cardrooms within the state.

The original intent of the moratorium was to temporarily freeze the expansion of gambling in California while the State Legislature crafted what would eventually become the Gambling Control Act ("Act") in 1997 ,legislation that requires the licensure and regulation of cardrooms on a statewide level.

Passage of the Act ultimately extended the moratorium on issuing any new cardroom licenses and expanded the definition of "expansion of gambling" to also include the number of tables in a local jurisdiction. Under this definition, a local governmental body is prohibited from amending its Ordinance in a manner that would result in an increase of 25%o or more (when compared to that authorized on January l,1996) in either the number of gambling tables in the I
MEETING DATE: 9^312022
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Potential Modifications to City of Folsom Cardroom Ordinance and Direction to City Staff
FROM: Community Development Department

09/13/2022 Item No.14.
jurisdiction or in the number of gambling tables operated in a cardroom in that jurisdiction.

In the 20 plus years since the Act's passage, the Legislature has enacted several exceptions to the moratorium that allow for a modest increase in the number of tables operated in a licensed gambling establishment (e.g., 2-3 tables). The city of Folsom utilized one of these statutes to increase the number of tables that could be operated in a cardroom from 6 to 9 in 2010. Under the most recent statute enacted in20l3, the City is eligible to add 2 additional tables to its Ordinance increasing the number of card tables from 9 to I 1.

In addition to the State legislation, the Folsom Municipal Code (FMC. Chapter 5.20 Cardrooms) includes provisions regarding the number of cardrooms permitted within the City and the number of card players allowed at atable. Specifically, the Folsom Municipal Code (FMC Section 5.20.050 (C)) states that no cardroom license shall be granted when the number of cardroom licenses in the City exceeds the ratio of on cardroom for each two thousand five hundred persons in the City according to the last preceding federal census. The 2020 United States Census estimated the population of Folsom at 80,454 persons, thus a maximum of 32 cardrooms would be permitted if consistent with state law. The Folsom Municipal Code (FMC" Section 5.20.070 (.AX4)) also dictates that no more than l0 players be permitted at a single card table within a cardroom.

The City currently only has one authorized cardroom (Lake Bowl Cardroom) which is situated within the FLB Entertainment Center located at 511 East Bidwell Street. The owners of Lake Bowl Cardroom have entered into negotiations for the sale of the cardroom's physical assets to Delta C,LP. in consideration of FLB's agreement to surrender both its local cardroom license and State gaming license so that Delta C, LP may apply for a new cardroom license with both the City and the State. Delta C, LP has extensive experience in operating cardrooms and own 3 cardrooms, all of which are located in the City of Stockton. The Folsom Municipal Code GMC. Section 5.20.080(BX1)) states that the assignment or transfer of a cardroom license from a partnership to one or more of the individual partners, or the addition of a new partner is prohibited. As a result, Delta C, LP would be required to apply for a new cardroom license to operate within the City as Lake Bowl's cardroom license is not transferrable (FMC.

Section. 5.20.080).

On June 1,2022, Delta C, LP submitted an application to the City requesting approval of a Municipal Code Amendment to amend the City of Folsom Cardroom Ordinance with the purposes of (l) increasing the number of permitted card tables in any cardroom from 9 to 1 1; and (2) allowing the practice of Backline Betting to occur in any cardroom. Delta C, LP stated in their application that these amendments to the City's Cardroom Ordinance are necessary for the cardroom to be able to compete with cardrooms in other local jurisdictions in the Sacramento area.
2 Page 102
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

The following are the specific amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance being proposed by Delta C, LP:
a Amend s.20. to
increase the number of card tables in the City from 9 to 11, pursuant to the allowance provided by Business and Professions Code $ 19961.06(b), and add language to this Section that would allow the City to take advantage of any future table increases authorized by the Legislature without amending the Cardroom Ordinance as follows:

5.20.070 Cardroom regulations.

A. No person shall operate a cardroom in violation of any of the following regulations: '

2. No more than +ne eleven (l I) card tables shall be permitted in any cardroom. alter the res
the Gamblinp C Act. Business and Professions Code section 19800 et sea.. to allow for an increase in the current number of tables without voter annroval. the maximum number o.f tables permitted in an)t cardroom mav be increased, subiect to citv council allo un to the amount such iudicial or lesislative action allows. not a
to exceed a maximum of lifteen 5) tables.

Delete Section 5.20.070(A.X13.Xd.) of the Folsom Municipal Code, which currently prohibits the practice of "backline betting" within the City as follows:

13. The following provisions shall govem wagering limits: It is unlawful for any person to bet or wager at or against any card game held at a licensed gaming club except as allowed by this chapter. In addition to any conditions that may be imposed on a license, the following restrictions shall apply:

Backline Betting is the practice of placing a bet behind any seated player's bet on a California table game such as Baccarat, California Blackjack, and Pai Gow Poker. A backline bettor does not occupy a seat at the gaming table, regardless of whether the table has seats available, and may place bets behind multiple seated players. The Gambling Control Act expressly authorizes backline betting and states that "The Commission shall not prohibit, on a statewide basis, the placing of a wager on a controlled game by a person at a gaming table, if the person is present at the table and actively participating in the hand with a single-seated player upon whose hand the wagers are placed". (Business and Professions Code section 19843.) When more than one patron participates in the player-dealer position-by, for example, sharing the seated player-dealer's wager, or taking any excess wagers the seated player-dealer's wager does not cover-no one person is taking on all comers, paying all winners, and collecting from all losers (e.g., "banking" as that term has been authoritatively defined). Backline Betting is a J Page 103
09/13/2022 Item No.14.
common practice in both cardrooms and casinos that allows for more action and the sharing of risk, which is not only appreciated by players, but consistent with the legislative intention to eliminate banking.

POLICY / RIII,E
Under Section 2.I2 of the City Charter, amendments to the Folsom Municipal Code require review and approval by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
As referenced in the Background section of this report, the City received an application requesting approval of a Municipal Code Amendment to amend the City of Folsom's Cardroom Ordinance with the goals of (1) increasing the number of permitted card tables in any cardroom from 9 to 11; and (2) allowing the practice of Backline Betting to occur in any cardroom. It is important to acknowledge that the scope of the request is fairly limited given that there is currently only one authorized cardroom within the City, and that the number of authorized cardrooms would not change with this particular Amendment. Prior to commencing a detailed analysis of the potential impacts associated with the proposed Cardroom Ordinance, City staff is requesting the City Council provide policy direction to better assist City staff with the ultimate evaluation.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
While it is difficult to quantiff the direct and indirect financial impacts the proposed Cardroom Amendments will have, the modifications to the Ordinance may allowthe City's only cardroom to compete more effectively with cardrooms located in other nearby jurisdictions. Attached to this staff report is a2019 Economic Impact Report (Attachment l) provided byDelta C, LP, detailing the expected financial contributions of the Lake Bowl Cardroom to the City of Folsom's economy as commissioned by the California Gaming Association.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is categorically exempt under Section 15061(bX3) Review for Exemption of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Cardroom Ordinance Modification Language

2. 2019 Economic Impact Report: The Economic Impact of Cardrooms to Folsom 4Page 104
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
5 Page 105
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

Attachment I
Proposed Cardroom Ordinance Modification
6 Page 106
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

Chapter 520
CARIIROOMS*

5.20.0?0 Cerilrnom rnegulations.

A- No person shall onrerate a cardroorn in violation of any of ttre follouring regulaticns:
2- No more tlranaia*efwefi l card tables shall be permitterl in asy cardroorn- shoald iwdicial or artiam atrter the resfr"r'c*sltc or limitatieors tke {}awhlivts Contral ,{cf, Bu"rffiass srnd Code section J980CI et sea.. ro affow frr inr,rea.ce in the turrent tables wrfftouf number
eandraom fo council
legislative action allows, nct to sxceed a mffiir&um qf frfreen {15} tables. 13- The following provisions sbalt govern gragering limits: It is rrnlaudrl for any person to bet orwager * or against aay card garne held at a licensed gaflrtf,g club excep as alloured by this chapter- In addition to arty conditions that may be imposed on a license, the foltowing reskictions shall apply:
or
Beffiiitsd tB pk€e n suager 6a n
I
7 Page 107
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

Attachment 2
2019 Economic Impact Report:

The Economic Impact of Cardrooins to Folsom
8 Page 108
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

CREfiTIHG JOBS
ETiJIPOWERil{G
c(}runiluillTlE$
JII I .:!.;iiirl;ir j,rt{t.ti:j lir lliil,li;r;;:.;.: i,l:,rl;lrui;itr l; Ths Ecnnrmic lmpatl of Gardraome
to Folsom
Economrc lnrpactJoLrs
[}irect
Totel Direct
$7r4,700l8
$784,600z?
40 $1,55S,300
700
o $100
o $o
o $10,300
o $48,m0
o $1S,500
$5.S00o
0 $51,300
$541.80010
$548,S0
1 $45.700
o $7.000
ts $1.271.SS0
Construction
Wl}olesale
Hetail
& Communication
Finance lnsurance & Real Estate
Business & Personal
Travel & Entertainment
Govemrnen!
Total
$3m
$o
$26,SOO
s'r87
$ 200
s1
lndueed
construction
Wholesale
Trang & Communication
lnsurance & Real Estate
Buginess & Personal Services
& Entenainment
Other
Total lnduced
o $200
o $o
0 $10,300
0 $€3,S00
o $r7,200
$162.6004
#I7.100o
$176.6003
6 $361.900
4 $10s.700
o $6.000
0 $15,500
$s70.40017
$27
$1
$s00
$o
700
100
100
700
Toial Economic lurpactl I $r s,245,6o0
9 Page 109
09/13/2022 Item No.14.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.14.
a.'
F()r-S()NI
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff is seeking early Council direction on key changes proposed to the current administrative and review processes as part of the current Zoning Code update effort (Title 17 of the Folsom Municipal Code or FMC). Specifically, questions and recommendations in this report address the appropriate level of design review for smaller projects, public noticing and outreach, minor modifications to design and development standards, and the appeals process.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
City staff and its consultant team (Mintier Harnish) are in the process of updating the City's Zoning Code, which has not been comprehensively updated for decades. .Based on staff s review of the current zoning administrative and review processes in the code, several of the processes are time-consuming, costly, and inefficient. There are four key areas of the current administrative and review processes that staff reviewed and are recommending process changes. These include:

1. Design Review

2. Permits and Variances

3. Public Hearings, Notices and Outreach

4. Appeals
The proposed concepts, as described in the Analysis section of this report, would apply to all areas of Folsom except the Historic District and those areas of the City within a specific plan.

I
MEETING DATE: 911312022
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Zoning Code Update - Workshop on Proposed Zoning Administration and Review Process Changes and Direction to Staff
FROM: Community Development Department

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Some of the proposed changes are the result of staff and community input that has been received over the past few years. In addition, changes in State law are removing jurisdictions' discretion as it relates to housing approvals. As a result, some of the proposed changes are reflective of those amendments to State law.

The changes to zoning for the Historic District will be handled separately after completion of the rest of the Zoning Code. Based on feedback about the Historic District and the number of issues raised in this area, staff will be completing the Historic District portion of the Zoning Code update separately after the update and adoption of the rest of the Zoning Code. This is so that staff can spend more time and hold more workshops to discuss major design and use issues in this area. As a result, staff will conduct a separate hearing for the Historic District to review and provide recommendations on the administrative and review processes for that area later next year.

With Council direction staff will complete the administrative sections of the Zoning Code and along with the other sections present those as a public review draft. The public review draft will be made available for 30 days for public input and staff will host workshops with the Planning Commission and City Council on the draft document in early 2023.

POLICY / RIII,E
There are several important goals, policies, and programs from the City's 2035 General Plan and the 2021-2029 Housing Element that relate either directly or indirectly to the Zoning Code update and the review process. These policies are:

General Plan:
. Policv LU 1.1.1 Zoning Ordinance: Ensure that the Folsom Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the 2035 General Plan.
o Policy LU 1.1.12 Infill Development: Coordinate with the real estate development community to encourage infill development in key parcels north of U.S. Highway 50.

Infill development should follow these guidelines:

1. Respect the local context. New development should improve the character and connectivity of the neighborhoods in which it occurs. Physical design should respond to the scale and features of the surrounding community, while improving critical elements such as transparency and permeability.

2. Work with neighbors. Infill development requires neighborhood consultation to understand the concerns, goals, and needs ofexisting neighborhoods.

Ensure the planning and design process provides proper avenues for neighborhood input while fulfilling the community's larger goals for walkability and compact development.
o Goal LU 9.1 Communitv Desien: Encourage community design that results in a 2 Page 112
09/13/2022 Item No.15.
distinctive, high-quality built environment with a character that creates memorable places and enriches the quality of life of Folsom's residents.

Housing Element:
o Policy H-2.1 Permit Processins and Review Times: The City shall continually strive to shorten permit processing and review times to the greatest extent possible and will consider allowing concurrent processing for affordable housing projects. o Policy H-2.5 Objective Standards: The City shall endeavor through its development and design standards and decision making to provide consistent and predictable policy direction based on objective standards for multi-family residential project applicants.
o Implementation Program H-8 Objective Design Standards for Multifamily Housing: The City shall rescind the Design Guidelines for Multifamily Development upon adoption of the Housing Element and shall adopt objective design standards for multifamily development, as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update.
o Policy H-3.7 By-right Housing on Previously Identified Housing Sites: The City shall allow housing developments with at least 20 percent affordable housing by- right, consistent with objective design standards, on lower-income housing sites that have been counted in previous housing element cycles, consistent with AB 1397.

ANALYSIS
As part of the Zoning Code update, staff has reviewed the administrative processes including the permit process, design review process, and the appeals process. In addition, staff has also reviewed the current public hearing, public noticing, and outreach process. Staff evaluated the different processes based on input from the public, applicants, City staff and the Commissions. Staff compared the existing processes in the Zoning Code with those of other jurisdictions in our region. The analysis below looks at each of the four issue areas (design review, permits and variances, public hearings and noticing, and appeals), asks key questions, and provides recommendations for improvement as well as background information explaining the reasons for the recommendations.

Issue # 1: Design Review Process:

Back in August 2018, the City Council approved the2035 General Plan, which in the Land Use Element, identifies what type of development (single-unit residential, multi-unit residential, commercial development, etc.) should occur in each area of Folsom. In addition, the Land Use Element established Community Design goals and policies. Furthermore, the City Council will be required to adopt objective design standards for all residential development in accordance with State law. Once these documents and design standards are reviewed, adopted and in place, the first question is:

J Page 113
09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Design Question I: Should the City continue to require homeowners, businesses, property owners, and developers to obtain Planning Commission approval for their design if they comply with adopted City development and design stqndards? The current thresholds for Planning Commission-level design review (outside of the Historic District) are as follows:
o Non-residential projects larger than 1,000 square feet o Residential projects with more than 2 units
o Significant exterior modifications that include changes in exterior building materials For example, under the current thresholds a four-unit apartment project would be subject to Planning Commission approval. However, because Planning Commission review is longer than director-level review this threshold could be considered inconsistent with Housing Element Policy H-2.1, which committed the City to reduce permit processing and review times for housing development.

In another example, if a store that is 1,500 sq. ft. changes the exterior materials on the building from brick to stone that project currently must go to Planning Commission for approval. As a result, that process includes preparation of a staff report, presentation, applicant and designer attendance at the meeting, and this adds anywhere from one to three months to the review process.

To provide some context for a change to the thresholds, most new apartment projects in new development areas like the Folsom Plan Area are typically 100 units or more, while infill apartment projects are often smaller in scale and have fewer units due to the smaller lot sizes typical in infill areas. Commercial projects vary in size depending on the type of use. The table below show the building sizes for some typical retailers (refer to Table 1).

Table I
of Commercial Sizes
* N ot e : C omm er ci al s qu ar e fo ot age fi gur es ar e r ounde d.

Source: Net Lease Advisor (www.netleaseadvisor.com), August 2022. 4 Retailer Type of Use Tynical Buitdins Size*
Starbucks Coffee chain 1,500 -2.000 sq. ft.

Chipotle Fast food restaurant 2,000 - 3,500 sq. ft.

Panera Bread Fast food restaurant 4,000 - 5,000 sq. ft.

Bank of America Bank 4,000 - 5,000 sq. ft.

AutoZone Automotive parts store 7,000 sq. ft.

Dollar General Discount store 9,000 - 10,000 sq. ft.

Walgreens Pharmacy 14,500 sq. ft.

Safeway Grocery store 45,000 - 60,000 sq. ft
Bie box hobbv store 55.000 - 64.000 sq. ft.Hobby Lobby

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Design Question 2: What does the City hope to achieve by requiring Planning Commission review for projects that comply with the General Plon, the Zoning Code, and objective design standards or guidelines?
In our region, there is no uniform threshold for what is handled at director level versus what is handled at the Commission or Council level. As shown in Table 2, some jurisdictions like Rocklin and Roseville only allow minor design modifications to be heard at the director level while other jurisdictions like Sacramento and Elk Grove allow much larger projects to be handled by the director. For example, in the City of Elk Grove, the Development Services Director handles design review for apartment projects with less than 150 units and non- residential projects under 10,000 square feet.

Staff Recommendation.' Increase thresholds for directorlevel design review. For commercial projects consider a new threshold of5,000 square feet and for residential projects consider a new threshold of l0 units.
5

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Table 2
Summ of or Thresholds for Review
*Note: This is q summctry table of major criteria triggering design review. All jurisdictions exempt small accessory structures, repair and maintenance, and repainting, and ADUs less than 800 sf and 16 feet tall or less, etc. 6 Commission Level
o Residential: Projects with more than 2 units.
o Commercial: New buildings greater than 1,000 sf or
. Major modifications or site changes
o Residential: Projects with l0 or more units
o Commercial: 5,000 sf ormore
o Residential: Multi-family projects with 150 units or
more and residential subdivisions
o Commercial: Projects 10,000 sf or more and
additions of 10,000 sf or more
o Residential Single-family subdivisions and master
plans
o Commercial: Projects over 5,000 sf or additions
beyond that amount
o Industrial: Projects over 10,000 sfand additions
beyond that amount
o Inteemted developments
o Residential: Projects with 5 or more lots
o Commercial: New projects
o Maior modifications
o New buildings or projects involving significant site
alterations
o Project involving change to or construction on an
existing landmark or historic resource as determined
by Director
. Any project elevated to this level by Director
Director Level
o Residential: Custom homes and duplexes
(2 units or less)
o Commercial: 1,000 sf orless
o Minor modifications
o Residential: Projects with 5 to 9 units
o Commercial: 5,000 sf orless
o Residential: Multi-family with less than
150 units
o Commercial: Projects less than 10,000 sf
and additions of less than 10,000 sf
o Commercial: Less than 5,000 sf
o Industrial: Less than 10,000 sf
o Residential: Remodels of multi-family
o Residential: Projects of 4 or fewer lots;
small additions, minor modifications
. Minor improvements or alternations only
o Projects consistent with Downtown
Specific Plan
r Projects involving deviations from design
guidelines or development standards
o Development project involving a
landmark or historic resource
o Project elevated by to this level by
Director
Staff
Level
Review
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
All
projects
Custom single-family
homes
Custom single-family
homes; additions of
less than 1,000 sf
Custom single-family
homes; additions of
less than 1,000 sf
New single-family
homes outside of
certain districts
Custom single-family
homes and duplexes
Alterations to existing
structure or site that
does not change the
function or appearance
Exempt*
Residential changes
that don't require a
building permit
Jurisdiction
Folsom
(Existing)
Citrus
Heights
Elk Grove
Rancho
Cordova
Rocklin
Roseville
Sacramento
(Crty)

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Issue #2: Permitting and Minor Modification Process
While the City has a variety of planning permits most are granted by the Planning Commission and there is no flexibility granted to the Community Development Director for projects with unique situations requesting minor deviations from development standards. Under the current situation, this can result in an expensive and time-consuming process for applicants.

Permitting Process Question: Should the City change its current process to allow for some use permits and requests for deviations to be handled at the director level? Under the current zoning regulations in the case of use permits, there is very little difference between the major and minor conditional use permit. The only difference between these is the fee ($2,683 vs. $5,528). Both require staff reports, public hearings and noticing, and both go to Planning Commission for review and approval. There is no use permit handled at the director- level. As shown in Table 3 below, Folsom is one of the few jurisdictions that does not have an administrative use permit or minor use permit that is handled at the director-level.

Com
Table 3
of Level of Use Permit roval
If an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) is added to the new Zoning Code, it would be used in cases where the use is appropriate for the zoning district but there are additional standard conditions needed to ensure its compatibility with surrounding uses that would be applied by the director. An example would be a major automotive repair facility in the C-3 (General Commercial) zone. Major automotive repair is an appropriate use in the C-3 zone, but certain standard conditions would apply such as hours of operation, loading and delivery activities, limitation on vehicle idling if near residential, etc. In another example, a wine tasting room in the C-l (Neighborhood Business) zone is an appropriate use, but staff would use an AUP to impose standard conditions such as hours of operation, prohibition on outdoor entertainment, compliance with any Folsom Police and State Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) requirements, limit on hours for outdoor seating areas, etc.

In addition to the lack of an administrative use permit process, the City also lacks the ability to handle requests for minor deviations from existing standards without an expensive and time- consuming process for the property owner as noted above. The only tools that the City offers is the Variance or the Planned Development (PD) permit. However, the Variance process includes findings that are diffrcult to meet, both permits are very expensive ($1,567 for a Variance and 7 Jurisdiction
Administrative/
Minor Use Permits Conditional Use Permit
Folsom (Existine) Commission Commission
Citrus Heiehts Plannine Director Commission
Elk Grove Zoning, Administrator Commission
Rancho Cordova Planning Director Commission
Rocklin N/A Commission
Plannine Manaser Commission/CommiueeRoseville
Sacramento (CiW) Plannine Director Director or Commissron

09/13/2022 Item No.15.
$8,525 + $426lacre for the PD permit), and the process is time consuming as these both require Planning Commission approval. Examples of these kinds of minor deviation requests include the following:

1. Minor Front Yard Encroachment: When a small portion of a proposed addition or new structure encroaches one or two feet into the front setback due to site conditions (e.g., avoiding a protected tree).

2. Minor Rear Yard Encroachment: An unusual lot shape that necessitates partial encroachment into the rear yard setback.

3. Minor Height Increase: A minor increase in rear building height to compensate for a slope issue, but no change to appearance of home at street level.

4. Existing Nonconformity: Allowing applicant to do a small addition to their home even though it has an existing non-conforming condition (e.g., one-car garage) that normally would prevent any work on the home without resolution of the non-conformity.

5. Minor Parking Reduction: Request for a parking reduction of one or two spaces for a commercial use that improved their building including adding parking lot shading trees, but the trees prevented the applicant from meeting its parking obligations.

When comparing Folsom with other jurisdictions in our region (refer to Table 4), the City stands apart since Folsom is the only jurisdiction that requires all requests for minor modifications or deviations to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval.

Com
Table 4
of Allowed Minor Deviations
Staff Recommendation.' Two changes are recommended: l) create a new director-level Administrative Use Permit (AUP) process for appropriate uses in the zone that require certain standard conditions; and2) create a minor modification process that is handled at the director 8 Jurisdiction
Amount of
Deviation Areas of Allowed Deviation
Approval
Level
Folsom (Existins)
No
threshold Any area except density and use
Planning
Commission
Citrus Heights Upto 30%o
to 40o/o
Setbacks, parking, lot coverage and
heieht
Planning
Director
Elk Grove Up to l0% Height, setback, lot coverage,
maximum allowed signage area,
sign height, sign setbacks, sign
proi ections. and parking provisions
Development
Director
Rancho Cordova Up to 30Yo
to 40%;o
Parking, setbacks, height Planning
Director
Rocklin Up to 10% Lot area, depth, or width; setbacks;
heieht; lot coverage
Planning
Director
Roseville Up to 35o/o Any modification to permit and up to 35o/o deviation from development
standards
Planning
Manager
Sacramento (City) No
threshold
All development standards and
design guidelines
Planning
Director

09/13/2022 Item No.15.
level and allows for minor deviations (such as a l|Yo deviation) from existing development standards (e.g., height, setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, parking, etc.).

Issue #3: Public Hearings, Notices and Outreach Process Under the City's current process for development projects, which requires a public hearing, Planning staff sends out a request for comments to other City departments, outside agencies, and any business or community groups that have requested reviews. This is generally done within the first few weeks of receipt of the application. For design review applications only, City staff also posts the site at least five days prior to the hearing, requires the applicant to provide notices that City staff mails to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site ten days beforehand, and places a notice in the Folsom Telegraph or Sacramento Bee at least ten days prior to the hearing consistent with the current requirements of the Zoning Code and State law (Govemment Code Section 65090 et seq.). For larger or controversial projects, Planning staff encourages applicants to reach out to neighborhood andlor business groups that may be affected by the project or have an interest in the project. Large project applications are also posted on CDD's Pending Development Apolications webpage while director-level design review projects are uploaded to the Active Staff-Level Design Review Submittals webpaee.

Outreach Question: As the Council considers the recommendations to shift more minor reviews to director level and as the State makes mole review processes ministerial (i.e., handled at stafflevel with no discretion), should staffincrease outreach and noticing e spe cially for lar ge pr oj e cts ?
If the answer to the question above is yes, there are several different approaches that jurisdictions in our region have taken to increase transparency and create opportunities for public input and involvement. These include :

Early Notification:
o Email Notification: Early email notices to neighborhood and business associations (within 2 to 4 weeks of application receipt) (City of Sacramento) o Site Posting: Early site posting after design review application receipt (Sacramento County and City of Sacramento) in addition to normal posting of site before the public hearing.

Director Reports:
o Expand the director's report to the Planning Commission to identifu all projects approved at the director-level and where information on those projects can be found on the CDD's website.

Public Hearins Notices:
a
a
a
o Increasing the distance from the project site for mailed public notices (refer to table below)
o Requiring the public hearing notices be mailed to both property owners and tenants (Elk Grove)
Development Activiqv Website: Use of development activity webpage and activity tracker that shows active projects including both applications and projects under construction on an interactive map (Elk Grove, Davis, City of Sacramento) 9 Page 119
09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Communitv Outreach:
o Encouraging applicants to hold community meeting on their project and/or reach out to neighborhood and business groups (Citrus Heights, City of Sacramento) o Granting authority to the Community Development Director to require community meeting when appropriate (City of Sacramento) As shown in Table 5, more than half of the jurisdictions listed below now require notices for public hearings to be sent to property owners within 500 feet or more of the project site compared to the existing 300-foot requirement set forth in State law (Government Code Section 650e1(a)(a).

Table 5
of Public Distance
*Note: In Elk Grove, certain other projects require noticing I 000' or 2000' from the project site
StaffRecommendation: Improve the level of outreach and transparency by including the following approaches in the new Zoning Code:
. Early notification emails
o Provide expanded director reports with information on staff-level projects o Expand the public hearing notice radius from 300 to 500 feet o Set up a development activity webpage
o Encourage conrmunity meetings for larger projects and grant the director the authority to require a meeting
Issue #4: Appeals Process
Folsom's existing Zoning Code provides for two levels of appeal. For example, a design review of a custom home by the Community Development Director can be appealed to the Planning Commission and the Commission's decision can be appealed againto the City Council.

However, over the past ten years no more than five director-level decisions have been appealed all the way to the City Council. Typically, those have involved the design review of custom home projects focusing on the design and scale of the custom home. The key questions for considering updates to the City's appeal process are as follows Appeal Question l: With so few director-level projects that are appealed to Commission and then Council, what is the benefit of the two-level appeal process? NC
Jurisdiction Required Noticine Area
Folsom (Existins) 300'
Citrus Heiehts 300'
Elk Grove 500'*
Rancho Cordova 500'
Rocklin 600'
Roseville 300'
Sacramento (City) 500'
10 Page 120
09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Appeal Question 2: If the City changes to allow only one level of appeal, does the Council support having the Commission be the final hearing body for the appeals of director-level decisions or does the Council want that role? As shown in Table 6, while some jurisdictions such as Rocklin and Rancho Cordova still allow two levels of appeal, the rest do not. Jurisdictions that have reduced the number of appeals from two to one have done so in order to reduce the time and cost of the review process for the applicant, appellant, and staff. Larger and more controversial projects would still go the Planning Commission and then would continue to be appealed to the City Council. The Council would remain the final decision-making body in those cases.

Table 6
Com of Levels of
Staff Recommendation: One-level of appeal with director-level decisions appealed to the Planning Commission for final decision and Planning Commission decisions appealed to the City Council for final decision.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial changes are proposed as part of this workshop.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Public Resources Code, this activity will not have a significant effect on the environment and as such the project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA. Environmental review for the Zoning Code update will be conducted prior to the adoption hearings.

ATTACHMENTS
None
Submitted,
Level ofApncal:Jurisdiction
Two levelsFolsom (Existine)
One levelCitrus Heights
One levelElk Grove
Two levelsRancho Cordova
Two levelsRocklin
Roseville One level
Sacramento (City) One level
Pam Johns, C ty Development Director
11

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.15.

Book 1 Page 89
Folsom Public Financing Authority
July 12,2022
Meetins Minutes
Joint Gitv Gouncil / Folsom Redevelopment Successor Asencv / Folsom Public Financinq Authoritv / Folsom Ranch Financins Authoritv / South of 50 Parkinq Authoritv Meetinq Julv 12.2022
ROLL GALL:

Council/Boardmembers

Present:

Council/Boardmembers

Absent:

Participating Staff:

Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor
Kerri Howell, Mayor
None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
CONSENT GALENDAR:

9. Approval of the April 12,2022 Joint City Council and Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes

10. Approval of the May 24, 2022 Joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes
Motion by Vice Ghair Rosario Rodriguez second by Boardmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Gonsent Calendar.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Boardmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell NOES: Boardmember(s): None
ABSENT: Boardmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Boardmember(s): None
PUBLIG HEARING:

11. Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No. 3 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 DRAFT - Not fficial until approved Page 123
09/13/2022 Item No.16.

Folsom n'oo.
"t,L',l| HrX#;
JvIy 1.2,2022
i. Resolution No. 10884 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizing the lssuance of the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No. 3 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2022, the Execution of an lndenture Providing therefor, Authorizing the Execution of a Local Obligation Purchase Contract, and Authorizing Necessary Actions and the Execution of Other Documents in Connection therewith ii. Resolution No. O09-Folsom Ranch FA - A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Authorizing the lssuance, Sale and Delivery of Not to Exceed $12,000,000 Aggregate PrincipalAmount of City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No. 3 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022; Approving the Form and Substance of a Trust Agreement, Authorizing Modifications thereof and Execution and Delivery as Modified;Approving a Preliminary Official Statement, Authorizing Changes thereto and Execution and Delivery thereof and of an Official Statement to be Derived therefrom; Approving a Local Obligation Purchase Contract and a Bond Purchase Contract and Execution and Delivery of Each; and Authorizing Related Actions Necessary to lmplement the Proposed Financing
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni made a presentation.

Mayor Kerri Howell opened the public hearing. Hearing no public comments, the public hearing was closed.

Motion by Vice Ghair Rosario Rodriguez second by Boardmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 10884.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Boardmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell NOES: Boardmember(s): None
ABSENT: Boardmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Boardmember(s): None
Motion by Boardmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Vice Chair Rosario Rodriguez to approve Resolution No. 009-Folsom Ranch FA.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Boardmember(s): Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell NOES: Boardmember(s): None
ABSENT: Boardmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Boardmember(s): None

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, the meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 7:19 pm.

DMFT - Not fficial until approved

09/13/2022 Item No.16.

Book 1 Page 91
Folsom Public Financing Authority
JttlY 72,2022

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk/Board Secretary
ATTEST
Kerri Howell, Mayor/Board Chair
DMFT - Not fficial until approved

09/13/2022 Item No.16.

This page is intentionally lefr blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.16.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Finance Department recommends that the Crty Council receive and file the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority monthly Investment Reports for the month of June 2022.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Under the Charter of the City of Folsom and the authority granted by the City Council, the Finance Director is responsible for investing the unexpended cash of the City Treasury. The primary objectives of the City's investment policy are to maintain the safety of investment principal, provide liquidity to meet the short and long-term cash flow needs of the City, and earn a market-average yield on investments. The City's portfolio is managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and is consistent with state and local laws and the City's investment policy. The Finance Department hereby submits the investment reports for the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority for the month of June 2022.

MEETING DATE: 91t312022
AGENDA SECTION: Joint Meeting Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, arid the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly Investment Reports for the Month of June 2022
FROM: Finance Department
I

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

POLICY / RULE

1. Section 3.30.010(a) of the Folsom Municipal Code states'othe term'city' shall encompass the city of Folsom, the Folsom community redevelopment agency, and all other agencies and instrumentalities of the city under either the direct or indirect control of the city council, and this chapter regulates the investment of all moneys of those agencies."

2. Section 3.30.030(0 of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "the city's chief investment officer shall each month submit an investment report to the city council, which report shall include all required elements as prescribed by California Govemment code section 53646."

3. California Government Code, Sections 53601 through 53659 sets forth the state law governing investments for municipal governments in Califomia.

4. Section 3.30.020(9) of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "all city cash shall be consolidated into one general bank account as set out in this code and invested on a pooled concept basis. Interest earnings shall be allocated to all city funds and subfunds according to fund and subfund cash and investment balance on at least a quarterly basis."

ANALYSN
Overview
The City has diversified investments in accordance with the City Investment Policy and Government Code. The City of Folsom's total cash and investments are invested on a pooled basis as required by the Folsom Municipal Code.

The Portfolio Summary of the City's current report includes a "Pooled Equity Section" identifuing the Redevelopment Successor Agency's (RDSA) and Folsom Public Financing Authority's (FPFA) portion of the investment pool. The RDSA and FPFA list these amounts under "Cash" in their respective sections. Currently, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority (FRFA) has no funds invested in Pooled Equity.

Cily of Folsom
Total Cash and Investments
The following graph illustrates the City's monthly cash and investment balances for fiscal years 2018 through 2022. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.

As of June 30, 2022, the City's cash and investments totaled $219,600,015; an increase of 845,340,251 (26%) from June 30,2021.
2 Page 128
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

City of Folsom Total Cash and Investments
(Fiscal Year)
-*-2or7ha -.,>2o7817e
-2o1el2o -2o2o/2r

AUG NOV JAN
-.-2u!22
APRFEB
Monthly
Chanee
MAR
s22o
S20o
180
g
s160
S14o
S12o
9100
s80
The following chart shows the City's monthly cash and investment balances and percentage change for Fiscal Year 2021-22 along with the yearly dollar and percentage changes.

Total City Cash and Investments
Monthly
2021-22 Chanse 2020-21
Yearly $
Chanse
Yearly Vo
Change
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
8 163,280,753
$ t49,509,252
s 146,444,211
$ 146,610,398
s 147,062,416
$ 161,954,751
$ 173,392,655
$ 181,302,338
$ 183,902,215
g 199,71s,442
s 214,741,017
$ 219,600,015
$ 148,832,109
$ 140,982,833
$ 136,560,020
$ 138,527,756
$ 132,111,422
s 143,343,763
$ 157,682,958
$ 156,040,724
s 151,601,388
$ 164,329,898
$ 174,655,617
$ 174,259,764
s 14,448,645
$ 8,526,419
$ 9,884,190
I 8,082,642
$ 14,950,994
s 18,610,988
$ 15,709,697
$ 25,261,614
s 32,300,827
$ 35,385,544
$ 40,085,400
$ 4s,340,2st
-8%
-2%
0%
0%
l0%
70h
5%
l%
9%
8%
2%
-5%
-3%
t%
-5%
9%
t0%
-l%
-3%
8%
6%
0%
l0%
6%
7%
6%
ll%
r3%
l0%
r6%
2t%
22%
23%
26%
The City's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments. In addition, in accordance with Section 3.30.020(c) of the Municipal Code, less than 50o/o of the City's total cash is invested for a period longer than one year.

J

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

To Maturityas of June 30,2022
4-5 Yrs
L9,437,067
0 Days
24,602,466
3-4 Yrs
22,043,669
to.7%
1 Day
50,900/452
22,7%
2-3 Yrs
29,226,769
12,7%
1-2 Yrs
26,297,822
L7.4%
184-365
2-183 Days
40,920,298

17.8%16,425,319

7.7%
Investment Performance
The City's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of June 2022 is presented in Attachment 1 to this report. Portfolio investment earnings (including pooled equtty earnings for the RDSA and FPFA) for the three-month quarter ended June 30, 2022 totaled$673,176.

The total rate of return of the investment portfolio for the same period was 1.26%.

The following graph illustrates the total dollar amount and allocation percentages for June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2022. The percentages in this graph are based on book value. 4Page 130
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

City of Folsom Portfolio Allocation
$120,000,000
$1 00,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$-
Cash - MoneyMarket Local
Government
lnvestment
Pool
Commercial
Paper
Certificates of Corporate US Agencies & Municipal
Deposit Bonds Treasuries BondsChecking
oJune 30, 2021 City Portfolio lJune 30, 2022 City Portfolio A detailed listing of the portfolio holdings as of June 30, 2022 is included in Attachment 2 to this report.

The Local Government Investment Pool (LAIF) yield typically moves in the same direction as market yields, but is less volatile, lagging somewhat behind market moves. This can be seen in the chart on the next page, illustrating the historical monthly change in yield from July 2019 through June2022 for LAIF and two-year US Treasury securities. The effective rate of return for the City Portfolio is also included.

The Federal Funds rate had been at 0.0%-0.25% from March 15,2020 to March 16,2022 in an effort to help consumers and businesses handle the financial challenges posed by the economic slowdown due to the onset of the Covid-I9 pandemic. Since that time the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has increased the Federal Funds rate four times, most recently on July 27,2022, to a rate of 2.25Yo-250%. Earlier projections anticipated to end the year at the 2.50Yo range; now the forecast is to be at least at 3.00% and perhaps substantially higher in an attempt to curb inflation. Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled recently that the Fed will continue to raise interest rates and keep them at higher levels until inflation is closer to a

2.0%o target inflation rate. The most recent year over year inflation rate as of July 2022 was

8.5yo, a modest improvement over June 2022 which was at a 40 year high of 9.I%. This improvement in July was mostly due to lower gasoline prices; however, natural gas prices spiked to their highest levels since 2008, the cost of food and shelter continued to rise, and many industries are experiencing shortages caused by supply chain delays that exert upward pressure on prices.
5 Page 131
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

Yield Comparison
July 2019 - June 2022

3.000h

2.50V"

2.000h

1.500h

1.000h

0.500h

0.00%
$C{drt'"$f$F1$r8+$.f+et"s$r$rs+$/+fsr1
+I,AIF +2 YrTrsy _-_CrtV
,J
I
I
A listing of transactions for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 is included in Attachment 3 to this report.

Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency
Total Cash and Investments
The RDSA had total cash and investments of $10,124,367 as of June 30, 2022. This is a decrease of $311,386 (3%) since June 30, 2021. The cash held by the RDSA is comprised of city-held funds, as well as 20Il bond proceeds to be utilized for housing and non-housing projects. These proceeds held by the Agency are broken out individually in the Portfolio Management Summary in Attachment L
The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipf of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.
6 Page 132
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

Folsom Redeve lopment Success or Agency
2021-22
Monthly
Change 2020-21
Monthly
Chanse
Yearly $
Chanse
Yearly oh
Change
Jul
Aug
sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
10,454,334
7,474,685
7 ,47 4,87 5
7,474,989
7,474,989
11,07 4,605
10,330,729
10,325,593
10,317,959
70,289,943
10,290,132
10,124,367
-29%
0%
0%
0%
54%
0%
-7%
0%
0%
0%
4%
-29%
0%
0%
0%
48%
-7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
ao/-
$ 10,002,863
s 7,059,737
$ 7,059,862
$ 7,056,132
$ 7,051,717
$ 10,861,946
$ 10,862,106
$ 10,077,418
$ 10,077,532
$ 10,039,788
$ 10,065,017
$ 10,435,754
451,471
414,948
415,013
418,857
423,273
212,659
(531,377)
248,175
240,426
250,155
225,115
(3 I 1,3 86)
$
$
s
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5%
6%
6%
6%
6%
2%
-5%
2%
2%
2%
2%
-3%
Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency Total Cash and Investments $15,000,000
s10,000,000
$5,000,000
s0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
s2019-20
'12020-21
.2021',2
The RDSA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The RDSA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of June 2022 is presented in Attachment 1. The RDSA's investment eamings for the three-month quarter ended June 30, 2022 totaled $32,065. The effective rate of return for the RDSA investment portfolio for the same time period is l.26Yo.
7 Page 133
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

Folsom Public Financing Authority
Total Cash and Investments
The FPFA cash and investments totaled $38,742,525 as of June 30, 2022. This is a decrease of $5,248,499 (12%) from June 30,2022. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of debt service repayment revenues and the subsequent debt service expenditures. The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period.

Folsom Public Financing Authority
2021-22
Monthly
Change 2020-21
Monthly
Chanse
Yearly $
Change
Yearly oh
Change
Jul
Aug
sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
$
$
$
s
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
s
43,982,425
43,982,425
38,732,656
38,623,009
38,623,010
39,623,011
38,623,020
39,623,021
38,637,684
3 8,528,05 I
38,725,372
38,742,525
$ 58,623,181
$ 61,219,871
$ 43,955,323
g 43,845,768
$ 43,845,770
$ 44,064,764
$ 44,064,765
$ 44,179,572
$ 44,085,165
$ 43,975,649
$ 43,975,651
$ 43,991,025
$ (14,640,756)
s (17,237,446)
$ (5,222,667)
$ (5,222,759)
$ (5,222,760)
$ (5,441,753)
$ (5,441,745)
$ (5,556,551)
$ (5,447,481)
$ (5,447,599)
$ (5,250,279)
$ (5,248,499)
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
t%
0%
4Yo
-28%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
-25%
-28%
-t2%
:12Yo
-12%
-12%
-l2Yo
-13%
-12%
-t2%
-12%
-t2%
Folsom Public Financing Authority Total Cash and Investments s75,000,000
$65,000,000
s55,000,000
$45,000,000
$35,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
tr 2019-20 D 2020-21 a2021-22
8 Page 134
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

The FPFA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FPFA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of June 2022 is presented in attachment l. The FPFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended June 30, 2022 totaled$284,413. The effective rate of return for the FPFA investment portfolio for the same time period is2.98%.

Folsom Ranch Financing Authority
Total Cash and Investments
The FRFA cash and investments totaled $107,145,000 as of June 30, 2022, an increase of $11,300,000 from the prior year. This increase is due to the issuance of $11,855,000 Community Facilities District No .23IAl (Folsom Ranch) Local Obligations on May 1I,2022.

The only other activity within FRFA was the maturing of $555,000 of local obligations held by FRFA on September 1, 2021.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FRFA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of June 2022 is presented in attachment l. The FRFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended June 30, 2022 totaled $1,173,916. The effective rate of return for the FRFA investment portfolio for the same time period is 4.69%.

South of 50 Parking Aathority
Total Cash and Investments
The South of 50 Parking Authority cash and investments totaled $0 as of June30,2022.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
There is no investment activity for the South of 50 Parking Authority 9 Page 135
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENTS

1. City of Folsom, Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, Folsom Public Financing Authority, and Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Portfolio Management Summary June2022

2. City of Folsom Portfolio Holdings as of June 30,2022

3. City of Folsom Transaction Summary, Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2022 Submitted,
Finance Director
Agency Finance Officer
Folsom Public Financing Authority Treasurer
Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Treasurer
South of 50 Parking Authority Treasurer
10Page 136
09/13/2022 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 1

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

W
Gity of Folsom
Gombined City of Folsom, Redevelopment
Successor Agency, FPFA & FRFA
Portfolio Summaries
June 30, 2022
Faco Amount
Sharsg
Book
Value
50 Naloma Sl.

Folsom, CA 95630
(918) 461-60E0
]FO]LSON{T
City of Folsom
Cash
Certiticate Of Deposit
Comm€rcial Paper
Corporate Bond
FFCB Bond
FHLB Bofld
FHLMC Bond
FNMA Bdd
Local GovEmment lnvestment Pool
Money Market
Municipal Bond
Treasury Note
Total , AveEge
YTM rOCort Cort Velue
2,622,O52.O0
9,878,335"19
34,710,851.37
23,025,329.64
8,961,1 70"00
15,838,400"05
5,473,i1t|6,50
1,84{t,240,00
66,423,466.0E
4,457,357"2E
52,576,338 15
L963.750.00
CoEt Value
3,020,193.04
2,591,295.00
4,512,477 17

2.17 Cost Valuo
129,179.57
16E.0,+5.80
38,445,000-00
Marl(ei
Value
Markal
Value
Msrkot
Value
Mer*et
Value
Day! to
Maturlty
1 831
10t
808
849
1243
388
1152
'l
1 790
533
Days to
Meturlty
AcErusd
lnteBet
Accrued
lntoreEt
Accrued
lntarcst
Accruod
lntemt
%ot
Portfol'lo
%ol
Portfolio

0.747%
2Affi

1.529%

2.086'%

2.2'13%
2"032%
212%

2.7N%
o"751

0.gEO%
't.7N%
'l-102%

1.350%
1"350%

1.360%
1,34lJEo
1,350%
13d,W.

2.9a7%
2,622,08.zfi
9,880,000.00
35,000,000,m
22,9118,000.00
9,(xD,000.00
15,850,000.00
5,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
68,423,,+60.08
4,457,357.24
52,790,000,00

2.O00.000_00
3,020,193.04
2,591,295.00
4,512.577 17

2.77 Book
Vrlue
olr ol
Portfollo
2,622,@2_@
9,878,691 10
u,749,732.il
22,991,971,01
8,965,,t89,71
15,835,762.24
5,479,O52.7A
I,659,628.71
68,423,46E_@
4,457,357.28
52,578,779"58
1-S71.834.91
s 219,600,015.26
10,124,365.21
129,479.57
3 229.653.880.01
2,An,WZ.0O
9,719,2ol8
34,775,300.00
21,7n,83f,.44
8,831,250.00
15,272,523.50
5,435,955.00
'l,836,8/10.00
98,423,'168.08
4,457,557 .28
50,914,686.20

1.91 9.060_00
36,779.10
101,608.01
22,350.00
8,109"22
I 0,120,84
2,@1.'17
269,338..13
102_46
100.00
tnte?€st Tot l Rate
of Rltum

1.14 4.29

15.19 s.96

3.91 6.88

2.39 0.87

29.69 1.93

22.91 0.E7
i 223,779,788.88 $ 229,853,860.04 I 225,9C7,571.06 455 0 191,012.21 Pooled
Cily of Folsom Cash and lnvestmsnts (€)dudng RDSA, FPFA & FRFA amounts) Redevelopmsnt Sucessor Agency (included in RDSA lnvestment Repott, Pr.6lic Finaneing Authority (induded in PFA lnvestment Report) Fdsom Ranch Financing Auihority (inclrded in FRFA lnveslment Report) Total Pooled Equlty

95.54%
4,.40%

0.06%
0 000/6
100.00%
Faco Anrount
Sherc8
Bool
Valus
Book
Valus
Book
Value
RedeyeloomentSucceasorAoencv YTMlaCost
Castr
Non-Housing 201 'l A Proceeds
HoG'rrE 20l lB Prce(b
Money lr/brkei
Totrl , Avorugo
Folsoln Public Financinq Autho.ity YTM @ Cort
Castr
i/bney ilarl(6t
Muniipal Bqd
Tohl / Awrage
Folsom Ranch Financinq Authorlty YTM Oco3l
Municfral Bond
Totrl t Average

1.350% $ 10,1u,3,67.ag S 10,124,367.38 I 10,12't,387.3E t 10,124,367.tE 3,020,193-04
2,50't,295.m
4,512,577.17

2.77 3,020,193-04
2,591,295.00
4,512,877.17

2.17 1l
2S.83

25.59 44.57

0.00 100.00
t00.m
lm oo
Fae Anount
Sheffi
t ayc to
Maturitft
chol
Porttollo
125,475.57
168,045-80
3E,445.0{n.00
125,479.57
16E,0/15.80

38.445.mo00
1?3,479"57
168,045.80
38,445,0m,00 14 379.594.12
Day! to

0.33 0.43
s.23

2.974% $ 1A,742,525.3f J 3A,712,525.t7 j 9a,712,525.a7 J 3,'.112p25.tf 2i|95 $ 379,59{.12 Face Amounu
Sham
"hot
PortfolbC6t Value Maturltv

1.679V. t07,1.t5.(X)0.00 107,145.000"00 107,t45.00O,00 107.145,0m.(X) rcS8 1,542,612,59

4.67996 I 107,1a5,00o.00 i 107,t45,00o.00 $ 107,1/15,000.00 t 107,1/15,000.00 739E 0 1,542,612.59 A)nvsl24-z}22

0.95%$ 1,703,704.51
86,441.80
1,174,235.70
Staey Tamagni, Finane Director Date
100.00

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 2

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

City of Folsom
Portfolio Holdings
Portfolio Holdings for lnv. Report
Report Format: By Transaction
Portfolio / Report Group: City of Folsom
Group By: Security Type
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
Asol613012022
Deecrlptlon lsglrol Coupon
Rlt
F!CG
AmUSharl3
%of
Pot{ollo
Cash
Wells Faroo Cash Wells Faroo 0.000 622,092.001 0-27
Wells Faroo Cash Alells Faroo 0.980 2.000,000.001 0.87
Sub Total / Average Cash o.747 2.622.092.001 1.14
Ally Bank 2.Ss 1219t2025 Allv Bank 2.950 246,000.00 0.11 Ameilcan ExDress National Bank 3.15 5111t2027 American Express National Bank 3.1 50 246,000.00 0.11 ADole Bank for Savinqs 2.4 4l2gl2o24 Aoole Bank for Savinqs 2.400 246,000.00 0.1'1 Belmont Savinos Bank 2.75 311412023 Belmont Savinos Bank 2.750 246:000.00 0.11 Beneficial Bank 2.15 10fi812022 eneficial Bank 2.1 50 247.000.00 0.11 BMW Bank of North America 2.5 412512025 BMw Bank of North America 2.500 246.000.00 0.11 Comenity Capital Bank 2.6 411412026 omenity Capital Bank 2,600 249.000.00 0.11 Discover Bank 3.2 511912027 Discover Bank 3-200 246.000.00 0.11 Eaqlemark Savinqs Bank 2.9 611312025 Eaqlemark Savinqs Bank 2.900 246.000.00 0.11 Ess€ntial FCU 3.55 121512023 Essential FCU 3.550 245,000.00 0.11 Farmeis & Merchants Bank3.3 5t27t2023 Farme/s & Merchants Bank 3.300 245,000.00 0-1 1 First Benk of Hiohland Park 2.2 812312022 First Bank of Hiohland Park 2.204 247.000.0( 0.'t l First National Bank Paraoould 2.6 611012024 First National Bank Paragould 2.600 249.000.00 0.'11 Greenstate CU 3.1 611412027 GreenState CU 3.100 24S.000.0 0.11 Jefferson Financial FCU 2.45 1111012022 Jefferson Financial FCU 2.450 245.000.00 0.1 Jonesboro State Bank 1.1 '121812026 Jonesboro State Bank 1 .10( 249,000.00 0.l l Kearney Bank 2.45 1113012023 Keamey Bank 2.454 247.000.0( 0.1t Lafayetle FCU 3.2 512612026 .afevette FCU 3.200 249.000.00 0.'l l Leader Bank NA2.55 412212025 Leader Bank NA 2.550 246.000.00 0.11 Medallion Bank 2.15 10/,1'112022 l\4edallion Bank 2,154 247.000.00 0.11 Moroan Slanlev Bank. NA 2.2712512A24 l\iloroan Stanlev Bank. NA 2.200 247,000.00 0.11 Moroan Slanlev Private Bank. NA2.2711812024 Moroan Stanlev Private Bank. NA 2.200 247.000.0r 0.11 National Coooerative Bank. NA 3.4 1212112023 National Coooerative Bank. NA 3.400 245.000.00 0.11 Neiqhboc FCU 3.3 9l'1912023 Neiqhbors FCU 3.300 245.000.00 0.11 New York Community Bank 0,65 5h012024 New York Communitv Bank 0.650 249.000.00 0.11 Oceanfi rst Bank NA 3.25 7 I 1 12024 Oceanflrst Bank NA 3.250 246,000.00 0.11 Pentaoon FCU 1.4 2fi812025 Pentaoon FCU 1.400 249,000.r 0.11 Procrowth Bank 1.2 812212024 ProGrowth Bank 1.200 24S,000.00 0.11 Ravmond James Bank, NA 1.95 8/23/2023 aymond James Bank, NA 't.950 247,000.00 0.11 Safra National Bank of NY 2 312412025-22 Safra National Bank of NY 2.000 247.000.04 0.11 State Bank of lndia NY 3.35 61112027 State Bank of lndia NY 3.350 245.000-0c 0.11 Svnchronv Bank 3.1 512012025 Svnchronv Bank 3.1 00 246.000.0c 0.1'l Svnovus Bank 1.45 1011712022 Svnovus Bank 1.450 248,000.0c 0.11 Texas Exchanoe Bank. SSB 1.25 1211012026 Texas Exchanoe Bank. SSB 1.250 249,000.( 0.11 Third Federal S&L of Cleveland 3.5 612812027 Third Federal S&L of Cleveland 3.500 245,000. 0.11 TtM. FSB 2.2416t2022 TIAA, FSB 2.200 247.000.0 0.11
)vota Financial Savinqs Bank 0,65 91912024 )vota Financial Savinqs Bank 0.650 24S,000.00 0.11 UBS Bank USA 2.9 41312024 UBS Bank USA 2.900 24S.000.00 0.11 Uinta Countv Bank 2.6 211612023 Uinla Countv Bank 2.600 246.000.00 0.11 Wells Farqo Natlonal Bank Wesl LV 1.9'112912023 Wells Fargo National Bank West LV 1.900 249,000.00 0.11 Sub Total / Averase Cerlificate of Deposit 2.439 9.880.000.00 4.29 BofA Securities lnc. 0 1012012022 BofA Securities lnc. 0.000 5,000,000.00 2.17 Ciliorouo Global Markets 0 31112023 )itiorouo Global Markets 0.000 5.000,000.00 2.17 Credit Aoricole CIB NY 0 1'111812022 Credit Aoricole CIB NY 0-000 2.500.000.00 1"08 Credit Aoricole CIB NY 0 8125/2022 lredit Aoricole CIB NY 0.000 5.000.000.00 2.17 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY 0 712512022 MUFG BanK Ltd/NY 0.000 5.000.000.00 2.17 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY 0 911912022 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY 0.000 2.500.000.00 1.08 Natixis NY O 111912023 Natixis NY 0.000 2.500.000.00 1 .08

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

0.000 5.000.000.00 2.17Natixis NYt19t2022

2.500.000.00 1.08Toyota Motor Credit Corp 0.00()redit Corp 0 712012022

15.1o.000 35,000,000.00
Bank of America Gorp 0.8 212412026-22 Bank of America CorD 0.800 2.000.000.00 0.87 Bank ol America Cory 4 51512026-22 Bank of America Coro 4.000 2,000,000.0 0.87 Bank of Montreal 1.22311712026-22 Bank of Montreal 1.220 2.000.000.00 0.87 Bank of Montreal Slep 7l3ol2o25-21 Bank of Montreal 1.000 2.000.000.00 0.87 Bank of NY Mellon 3.5 412U2023 Bank of NY Mellon 3.500 1,000,000.00 0.43 Barclavs Bank PLC 3'1011712023-22 Barclavs Bank PLC 3.000 2,000,000.00 0_87 lnll. Finance Com.2.65 6t2412O24 lntl. Finance Com. 2.650 2.000.000.00 0.87 Pacific Life GF ll 1.2 612412025 Pacmc Life GF ll 1.20A 1.500.000.00 0.65 PNC Bank NA2.7 111112022-22 PNC Bank NA 2.700 2.000.000.00 0.87 Roval Bank of Canada Var. Corp 311812025 Roval Bank of Canada 3.321 3.000,000.00 1.30 US Bank NA Cincinnati 2.85't12312023-22 US Bank NA Cincinnati 2.650 2.446,000.00 1.06 Wells Faroo & Co 2.625 712212022 Wells Faroo & Co 2.625 1.000,000.00 0.43 Sub Total / Avereoe CorDorate Bond 2.423 22.S,{6.000.00 9.96 FFCB Boncl
FFCB 0.68 12t20t2023 FFCB 0.680
FFCB t.75 2t25t2025 FFCB 1.750 2.000,000.001 0.87
FFCB 2.625 6t10t2024 FFGB 2.625 3.000,000.001 1.30
FFCB 2.8 11t25t2025 FFCB 2.800 2.000,000.001 0.87
Sub Total / Averaoe FFCB Bond 2.O37 9.000.000.001 3.91
FHLB Bond
FHLB 0.8 12t17t2024-21 IFHLB 0.600 2.000.000.001 0.87
FHLB 0.7 4t2412025-22 IFHLB 0.700 500.000.001 o.22
FHLB 1.375 8126t2026-22 IFHLB 1.375 2.000.000.001 0.87
FHLB 2.97 7t27t2026-23 IFHLB 2.970 2,000,000.001 0.87
FHLB37t22t2026-22 IFHLB 3.000 2.000.000.001 0.87
FHLB 3.05 7t28t2023-23 3.050 2.000.000.00t 0.E7
FHLB Steo 112712027-23 IFHLB 1.000 2.000.000.001 0.87
FHLB Step 211812025-22 IFHLB 0.875 1,350,000.001 0.59
FHLB Step 712912026-21 IFHLB 0.600 2.000,000.001 0.87
rHLB Bond 1.686 15.850,000.001 6.88
FHLMC Bond
FHLMC 0.25 812412023 FHLMC 0.250 1.500.000.001 0.65
FHLMC 2.3 5t't7 I 2023-22 FHLMC 2,300 3.000.000.001 1.30 FH LMC 2. 55 1 2 t2212023-22 FHLMC 2.550 1,000,000.001 0.43

1.781 5.500.000.001 2.39
FNMA Bond
FNMA 0.375 8t25t202s FNMA 0.375 2.000.000.001 0.87
Sub Total / Averase FNMA Bond 0.375 2.000.000.001 0.87
Local Governmenl lnvestment Pool
LAIF Citv LGIP LAIF Citv o.751 48,390,874.81 21.00
LAIF FPFA LGIP LAIF FPFA 0.751 20.o32.593.27 8.6S

0.751 68.423.468.( 29.6S
Monev Markel
Wells Farqo MM Wells Fargo 0.980 476.983.461 0.21
Wells Farqo MM Wells Farqo 0.s8c 3.980.373.821 1.73

0.980 4,457,357.281 1.93
Alvord USD GOBs 1.062 81112025 Alvord USD GOBs 1.062 1.280.000.00 0.5€ Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.269 81112022 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.269 300.000.00 0.13 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.638 81112024 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.638 250,000.00 0.1 1 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.269 E/112022 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.26S 140,000.00 0.06 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.369 8/1/2023 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.369 170,000.00 0.07 Beverlv Hills PFA Lease Rev 0.499 61112023 leverly Hills PFA Lease Rev 0.499 300.000.00 0.13 Beverlv Hills PFA Lease Rev 0.73 A112024 Beverly Hills PFA Lease Rev 0.73( 300.000.00 0.13 Beverlv Hills USD 2.45 81112024 Beverlv Hills USD 2.450 I 00 0.43 B€verlv Hills USD 2.65 81112025 Beverlv Hills USD 2.650 0.34 Bev€rlv Hills USD 2.7 81112026 Beverlv Hills USD 2.700 1,000,000.00 0-43 CA St DWR Cent Val Proi 1.051 121112026-21 CA St DWR Cent Val Proj 1.051 1.625.000.00 o.71

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

Cebrillo CCD 1.913 81112022 Cabrillo CCD 1 .913 230.000.00 0.1 0 Carson RDASA TABs 0.909 81112022 Carson RDASA TABs 0.909 400.000.0 o.17 Carson RDASATABS 0.981 81112023 Carson RDASA TABs 0.981 300.000.00 0.13 Carson RDASA TABs 1.188 8t112024 Carson RDASA TABS 1 .188 400.000.00 o.17 Carson RDASA TABs 1.288 81112025 Carson RDASA TABs 1.288 300.000.00 0.13 Citrus CCD GOBs 0.669 81112024 Citrus CCD GOBS 0.66( 400,000.0 o.17 Citrus CCD GOBS 0.819 81112025 Oitrus CCD GOBS 0.819 400.000.00 o.17 Coast CCD GOBS 1.975 8fi12023 Coast CCD GOBs 1.975 1.265.000.00 0.51 Colton LJSD 0.7 02 A 1 12023 Colton USD o.702 1.000.000.00 0.43 Colton USD 0.882 81112024 Colton USD 0.882 1.000.000.00 0.43 CSU Revenue Bonds 0.563 111112024 CSU Revenue Bonds 0.563 615.000.00 0.27 CSU Revenue Bonds 0.685 111112024 SU Revenue Bonds 0.685 500,000.00 0.22 Davis RDA-SA TABI 1.72 91112022 Davis RDA-SA TABs 1.724 1,225,000.00 0.53 Davis RDA-SA TA gs'|.7 5 gl'U2023 Davls RDA-SA TABs 1.75Q 625,000.00 o.27 Davis RDA-SA TAB' 2 91112025 Davis RDA-SA TABs 2.000 435.000.00 0.19 Dixon USD A.953 81112025 Dixon USD 0.953 1 00.000.00 0.04 Folsom Cordova USD lmp Dis122101112022 Folsom Cordova USD lmp Dist 2 2.000 160.000.00 0.07 Folsom Cordova USD lmp Disl221ol1l202g Folsom Cordova USD lmp Dist 2 2.000 165,000.00 0.07 Folsom Cordova USD lmp Disl2 2 101112024 Folsom Cordova USD lmD Dlst 2 2.000 1.000,000.00 0.43 Folsom Cordova USD lmo Dist2 2 1ol1l2o25 Folsom Cordova USD lmo Dist 2 2.000 1.040.000.00 0.45 Hope ESD 0.97 81112025 Hope ESD 0.970 300.000.0 0.13
Hope ESD 1.17 81112026 Hope ESD 1.170 285.000.0 Q.12
LA Cnty RDA Ref Aulh 2 91112022 L,q Cnty RDA Ref Auth 2.000 1.235.000.00 0.54 Los Altos SD 1 10/1/2024 Los Altos SD 1.000 2.000,000.0i 0.87 Marin CCD GOs 0.679 81112026 Marin CCD GOs I t79 900.000.00 0.39 Moreno Vallev USD 1.671 8t112023 tloreno Valley USD 1.871 140.000.00 0.06 Moreno Vallev USD 1.941 81112024 Moreno Valley USD 1.941 195.000.00 0.( Moreno Valley USD 2.203 81112025 Moreno Vallev USD 2.203 100.000.00 0.04 Moreno Vallev USD 2.328 8/112026 Moreno Vallev USD 2.32E 1'10.000,00 0.05 vlunieta RDA-SA TABS 2.5 8l'll2g22 Murriete RDA-SA TABs 2.500 250.000.00 0.11 Oak Grove SD 0.561 81112024 Oak Grove SD 0.561 600.000.00 0.26 Oxnard SD GOBS 0.587 81112022 Oxnard SD GOBS 0.587 700.000.00 0.3r Oxnard SD GOBs 0.82 81112024 Oxnard SD GOBS 0.820 345.000.00 0.15 Oxnard UHSD 0.372 811 12022 Oxnard UHSD 0.372 250.000.0r 0.11 Oxnard UHSD 1.256 811 12025 Oxnard UHSD 500,000.0( o.22 Palomar CCD 0.881 8|112025 Palomar CCD 0.881 300,000.00 0.13 Plttsburg USD 0.67 811t2024 rittsburo USD 0.670 680,000.00 0.30 Rancho Santiaoo CCD GOBs a.6Ugl1l2024 Rancho Santiago CCD GOBS 0.634 1.000.000.00 0.43 Riverside Cnty PFA 1.8471112025 iverside Cntv PFA 1.840 195.000.r 0.08 Sacramento Res" Sanitation Dlstrict 1.042 12111202 acramento Reo. Sanitation District 1-042 2.305.000.00 1.00 San Bernardino CCD 0.335 8i t/2023 San Bemardino CCD 0.335 1.500.000^00 0.65 San Bemardino CCD 0.605 81112024 San Bemardlno CCD 0-605 1.000.000.00 0.43 San Jose Everoreen CCD 0.921 91112025 San Jose Evemreen CCD 0.921 1,000,000.00 0.43 San Jose RDA-SA 2.63 8/1/2022 Sen Jose RDA-SA 2.630 1,000,000.00 0.43 San Jose RDA-SA 2.63 81112022 San Jose RDA-SA 2.630 1.000,000.00 0.r lan Jose RDASA TABS 2.828 81112023 San Jose RDASA TABS 2.828 500.000.00 o,2i Santa clarita PFA Lease Rev 0.976 611!2024-20 Santa Clarita PFA Lease Rev 0.976 355,000.00 0.15 Santa Clarita PFA Lease Rev 1.176 61112025-20 Santa Clarita PFA Lease Rev 1.176 360,000.00 0.16 SF BART Rev Bonds 2.62'1 71112023-17 SF BART Rev Bonds 2.621 735,000.00 0.32 St. of Texas GOB's 3.011 '101112026-25 St. of Texas GOB's 3.011 2.000.000.00 0.87 State of CA GO 2.5 101112022 State of CA GO 2.500 1.000.000.00 0.4i State of Callfornla GO 2.375 10tl12028 Stete of California GO aaa 1.600.000.00 0.69 Univ of CA Revenue 0.628 511512023-23 Univ of CA Revenue 0.628 1 25,000.00 0.05 Univ of CA Revenue 0.833 511512024-24 Llniv of CA Revenue 0.83t 250.000.00 0.11 Univ of CA Revenue 2.657 511512023-19 Univ of CA Revenue 2.657 500.000.00 o.22 Univ of CA Revenue 3.063 71112025 Univ of CA Revenue 3.063 985.000.00 0.4i Univ of CA Revenue 3,06371112025 Univ of CA Revenue 3-063 2.000,000.00 o.87 West Contra Costa USD 1.4U 8t112O22 Wesl Contra Costa USD 1.434 360,000.00 0.16 west contra costa usD 1.761 81112024 West Contra Costa USD 1.741 1.000,000.0 0.43 West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agy '1.847 91112 West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agy 1.847 200.000.00 0,09 osemite CCD 0.561 8l'i.12023 Yosemite CCD 0.561 1.000.000.00 0.43 Yosemite CCD O.7 S I I 1 12022 Yosemite CCD 290 550.000.00 o.24 Yosemite CCD 0.804 81112024 Yosemite CCD 0.804 500.000.00 0.22 Yosemlte CCD 1.14 81112023 Yosemite CCD 1.',t40 750,000.00 0.33 Yosemite CCD 1.rt4 81112024 Yosemite CCD 1.44( 300.000.00 0.'13 Yosemite CCD 1.68 750,000,0( 0.33

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

ATTACHMENT 3

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

City of Folsom
Transactions Summary
Transaction Summary - lnv€stment Report
Portblio / Report Group: Clty of Folsom
Group By: Action
Begin Date: o4lo1l2o22, End Date: 0613012022
Dercrlptlon Securlty Typ. Sattlenent
Date
Itrturlry
Dde
Frce
AmUSh8mB Prlnclp.l YTr@
' Coct
uy
Allv Bank 295 12;i912025 Certificate Of DeDosit 619t2022 121912025 246.000.00 246.000.00 2.950 American Express National Bank 3.15 5/11/2027 Certificate Of Deposit 5t1112022 il1il2A2? 246.000.00 246.000.00 3.150 Aoole Bank for Savinos2.4 412912024 Certificate Of Deposit 4t29n022 4t29t2024 246,000.00 246,000.00 2.444 Bank ofAmedca Com 4 gg2026-22 Corporate Bond 5t5f2022 5t5t2026 2,000,000.00 2,000.000.00 4.000 Beverly Hills USD 2.45 81112024 Municioal Bond 4t13t2022 811t20.24 1.000.000.00 1.000.000.00 2.4s0 Beverly Hills USD 2.65 81112025 Municipal Eond 4t13t2o22 8t1t2025 780,000.00 780.000.00 2 650 lev€rlv Hills USD 2.7 U1nO26 Municioal Bond 411312022 81112026 1,000,000 00 1,000.780.00 2.641 BMW Bank of North America 2.5 412512025 Certilicate Of DeDosit 4t8t2t 245.000.00 246.000.00 2 500 CA St DWR Cent Val Proj 1.051 12112026-21 Municipal Bond 414t2022 121112026 1,625.000.00 1.511.006.25 2.662 itiorouo Global Markets 0 3/112023 ommercial Peoer 6n2t2022 3/1t2023 5,000,000.00 4,888,000.00 3.273 Comenitv CeDital Bank26 411412026 Certificate Of Deoosit 411412022 411412026 249.000_00 249.000.00 2,600 Crsdit Aqricole CIB NY 0 11/'18/2022 Commercial Papsr 6t17nO22 11t't8t2022 2.500.000.00 2.473.156.U 2 537 Credit Aoricole CIB NY 0 812512022 Commercial Paper 5t18t2022 812512022 5,000,000.00 4.979.747.51 1_476 Davis RDA-SA TAB9 2 91 1 nO25 ilunicioal Bond 6t8t2022 g1t2a25 435.000.00 413.685.00 3.620 )iscover Bank 3.2 511912027 certificate of Deposit 5ne|2022 sl't912027 246.000_00 246.000.00 3.2m aolemark Sevinos Bank 2.9 5/13/2025 Certlficete Of Deoosit 6t15t2022 6t't3t2025 246,000.00 246,000.00 2_9m FFCB 2.625 611012024 FFCB Bond 6t10t202 6t'tot2024 3.000.000,00 2.9S6.790.00 2.680 FFCB 2.8 1112512025 FFCB Bond 6m2022 11t25t2025 2.000.000.00 1.987.240.00 2.94 ,HLB 0.7 4124t2025-22 FHLB Bond 61612022 4t24t2025 500,000 00 468.460.65 2,999 FHLB 2.97 7t27t2026-29 FHLB Bond 41?iil2022 7t27t2026 2.000.000.00 2.000.000.00 2.974 FHLB 3 7 t22t2026-22 FHLB Bond 4D2t2022 712212026 2,000.000.0c 2,000.000.00 3.000 FHLB 3 05 7t28t2023-23 FHLB Bond 612812022 7128t2023 2,000,000.00 2.000.000.00 3.050 FHLMC 2.3 5t1712023-22 FHLMC Bond 5t17t2022 5t't7t2023 3,000,000 0c 3,000.000.0 2.300 FHLMC 2. 55 1 2J2212023-22 FHLMC Bond 6t22t2 1.000.o00.oo 1.000.000.00 2.550 First National Bank Parasould 2.6 611012024 Certificate Of Deposit 611012022 6t10t2024 249.000.0c 249.000.00 2.600 :NMA 0.375 8t25t2025 FNMA Bond 4t6no22 8t25t2025 2,000.000.00 1.849.240.00 2.720 Greenstate CU 3.1 511412027 )eriificate Of DeDosit 511612022 5t14t2027 249,000.0C 249.000_00 3.'t00 lntl. Finance Corp. 2.65 61241m24 Coroorate Bond 6t24t2022 612412024 2.000.000.0c 1.998.620.00 2.686 srmev Bank 2.45 1113012023 Certificate Of Deposit 81112022 1113012023 247.000.00 247.000.00 2.450 Laf;evatte FCU 3.2 512612026 C€rtificate Of Deoosit 5t25t2022 5t26t2026 249,000.01 249,000.00 3.200 Leader Bank NA2,55 412212025 Certificate Of Deoosit 4l 4t22t2025 246.000.00 246.000.00 2.550 Marin CCD GOs O.67s thm26 MuniciDal Bond 5t27t2022 8t1t2026 900.000.00 812.583,00 3.1 80 MUFG Benk Ltd/NY 0 9/19/2022 Commercial Peper 411A12022 thst2022 2,500,000 00 2,486,097.22 1 307 Natixis NY 0 111912023 ;ommercial PaDer 4t27t202i 1t1912023 2.500.000.00 2.459.208 3i:t 2,26 Oceanfi rst Bank N A 3.25 7 I 1 12024 Certific€le Of Deposit 612912022 71112024 24€,000.00 246.000,00 3^250 Secremento Reo Sanilalion District 1.042 1?,/11202 Municloel Bond 4t2212022 1A112025 2.305,000.00 2.139.70E.45 3 160 San Bemardino CCD 0.335 81112023 l\Iunicioal Bond il1912422 8t1t2023 I,500,000.00 I .461.825.00 2.501 Stste Bank of lndia NY 3.35 61112027 certificat€ of D€Dosit 6t1no22 d1no27 245.000.00 245.000.00 3 350 State of California GO 2.375 1ol'l12026
of
41a/2022 10t'U2026 1,600,000.00 1,567 2.866

3.100
Third Federal S&L of Cleveland 3.5 612812027
ugt$Iq(g vt usPvltr
Certificete Of DeDosit 6/24t2022 6t2812027 245.000.00 245.000.00 3.500 ljniv of CA Revenue 3"063 7/1/2025 Municipal Bond 5t4t2022 7t1t2025 2,000.000.00 1.985.820.0 3.300 Sub Total /Averaoe Buv 55,206.176.34
Celled
State Street Coro 2.653 511512023-22 corporate Bond 5t15t2022 5t15t2023 2.530.000.00 2,530,000.00 0.000 Sub Total / Averaoe Called 2.530.000.00 2,530,000.00
Matured
CA Si DWR Pwr SuDo Rev 2 51112022 Municipal Bond 5t1t2022 5t1t2022 1.000.000.001 1,000.000 00t 0.000 CA St DWR Pwr SUDD Rav 2 51112022 rlunicioal Bond 5t1t202:, 5t1t2022 1.000,000.001 1,000,000.001 0"000 Cal St Hlth Fao Fin Auth Rev 1.693 6/1/2022 Municioal Eond 611t2022 4t1t2022 1.000.000.001 1.000.000.001 0.000 Citizens Deposit Bank ofArlinglon, lnc. 3-1 6/29/ Certificate Of Deposit 8t2912022 6t29t2022 246.000.001 246.000.001 0-000 Sallie Mae Benk2.6 411812022 Cortiftcate Of Deposit 4t1812022 4t18t2022 246,000.001 246.000.001 0.000 Svnchronv Bank 2.4 511912022 certificete of Deoosit 5t19t2022 il19nO22 240,000.001 240,000.001 0.000 Univ of CA R€venue 3.263 511512022-18 Municipal Bond 5t15t2022 5t1512022 500.000.001 500.000.001 0.000 VisionBank of lowe2j5 5lg1l2O22 Certificate Of Deposit 5t3112022 513112022 247.000.001 247.000 001 0.000 WexBank144lgl2022 Certifcate Of Deoosit 4t8t2022 4t8t202t 248,000.001 248,000-001 0-000 Sub Total / Average Matur€d 4.727.OOO.OOI 4.727.OOO.OOI

09/13/2022 Item No.17.

This page is intentionally left blank.

09/13/2022 Item No.17.