Folsom City Council
April 11, 2023

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 April 11, 2023
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, April 11, 2023 6:30 PM

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor

YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be conti nued to a future Council Meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming April 9-15, 2023 as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week in the City of Folsom

2. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Encouraging the Community to Become Involved in Arbor Day

3. Results of Historic Architectural Analysis for the Southern Pacific Railroad Depot Building and the Southern Pacific Railroad Superintendent House and Direction to Staff

4. Presentation of the Folsom Tourism Bureau Annual Report

3 CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

5. Approval of March 28, 2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

6. Ordinance No. 1338 – An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023- 24 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)

7. Resolution No. 11016 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring its Intention to Renew the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District

8. Resolution No. 11018 – A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to Install All-Way Stop Sign Control at the Intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street

9. Resolution No. 11019 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project

10. Resolution No. 11020 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project

11. Resolution No. 11022 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the Construction of Fire Station 34 Phase-2 Project No.

FD2234
NEW BUSINESS:

12. Resolution No. 11012 – A Resolution to Dually Name the Existing Green Room within the Historic Depot Building at 200 Wool Street the “Peter T. Lewis Green Room” and Recognition of Donation of Funds for Interior Improvements by the Lewis Family PUBLIC HEARING:

13. Appeal by Bob Delp of Decisions by the Historic District Commission Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for the Uncle Charlie's Firehouse and Brew Project (PN22-158) Located at 905 Leidesdorff Street and Determination that the Project is Exempt from CEQA OLD BUSINESS:

14. Study Session: Public Works Department’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Program COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:

CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

COUNCIL COMMENTS:

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If

4 you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of t he above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHO ULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Counci l meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

PROCLAMATION

OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING APril 09-15, 2023
as

NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEEK

IN THE CITY OF FOLSOM
WHEREAS, even in times of crisis, the communications dispatchers of the City of Folsom are responsible for answering incoming calls for emergency seruices and dispatching assistance to help save the lives and property of our citizens; and WHEREAT Folsom's communications dispatchers are the first, first responders and a vital t link to our police officers, monitoring radio activity, providing information, and enhancing their safetY; and
WHEREAS, the safety of our emergency responders is dependent on the quality and accuracy of information obtained from citizens who call the City of Folsom Public SafetY Answering Point; and
WHEREAS, in 2022, Folsom's communications dispatchers handled 88,247 telephone calls and dispatched 53,0t7 events; and
WHEREAS, in 2022, Folsom's communications dispatchers answered 99o/o of all 9-1-1 calls in 15 seconds or less; and
WHEREAS, Folsom's communications dispatchers contribute substantially to the apprehension of criminals and the quality of life of our citizens; and WHEREAS, Folsom's communications dispatchers exhibited compassion, understanding, and professionalism during the performance of their job in the past year.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ Mayor of the city of Folsom on behalf of the Folsom City Council do hereby proclaim the week of April 09-15, 2023, as NATIONAL qIIBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMTTNICATORS WEEK in the city of Folsom and extend our gratitude to Folsom's Communications Dispatchers for their dedicated seryice to our iommunity, their diligence and commitment to keeping our City and citizens safe.

PROCLAIMED this 11th day of April 2023.

Rosario Rodrig MAYOR
ATTEST
Cnnlsrn
uezl
Ctw Clrm
t' ' "r''9'l''
t'r.1, , 1i.il'
1,
,lI'\t r;el
,I {'t:fl

04/11/2023 Item No.1.

This page intentionollY Ieft blqnk
to facilitote double- sided printing .

CITY OF
FOLSOl\{

DISTIXCTIVE BY NATURE

04/11/2023 Item No.1.

PROCLAMATION

OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM

ENCOURAGING THE COMMUNITY TO BECOME INVOLVED
tn

ARBOR DAY
WHEREAS, in 1 g72, J. Sterling Morton proposed that a specialday be set aside forthe planting of trees; and
WHEREAS, in 1g07, president Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed this as a nationaltime to plant trees; and
WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughou! the nation and the world and will be celebrated in Folsom on Saturday, April 15,2023; and
WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating anO cooting costs, moderate the temperature city wide, catch rainwater, clean the air, produc-e life-giving oxygen, provide habitat for wildlife, and protect us from the harmful effects of the sun on our skin; and
WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource, giving us paper, wood for our homes and furniture, and sequestering air and soil-borne carbon; and
WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and
WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal; and WHEREAS, w€ will be engaging in tree care and maintenance activities of young trees along Folsom trails in celebration of Arbor Day'
NOW, THEREFORE, l, Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor of the City of Folsom, do hereby proclaim April 15, 2023 asAtO6r Day in the city-of Folsom, and urge all citizens to.celebrate Arbor Day by supporting efforts to protect our treei and woodlands, planting a tree of their own or joining in our City Arbor DaY event and;
FURTHER, I urge all citizens to enjoy the cool shade of trees and promote the well-being of this and future generations as Folsom becomes a Tree City USA for the seventeenth year in a row' PROCLAIMED this 11th day of April 2023
Rosario Rodrig ,MA
i\
ATTEST
Christa Freem CITY CLERK

04/11/2023 Item No.2.

This page intenti.onally left blonk
to focilitate double- sided printing .

CITY OF
F()LSOl\f

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE

04/11/2023 Item No.2.
,i ; 'i.1 'i'; i rt:\'J
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Staff will be making a brief presentation about the results of the Historic Architectural Analyses completed for the Pacific Railroad Depot Building and the Southern Pacific Railroad Superintendent House. The presentation will include a description of the recommended repairs to each building along with the associated costs. Staff will be asking for direction from the City Council on the scopes of work desired to be completed in the upcoming fiscal year as well as the funding source for these currently unfunded repair needs.

Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Director of Parks and Recreation
MEETING DATE: 41rU2023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentailons
SUBJECT: Results of Historic Architectural Analysis for the Southern Pacific Railroad Depot Building and the Southem Pacific Railroad Superintendent House and Direction to Staff
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
1

04/11/2023 Item No.3.

This pnge intentionallY Ieft blonk
to focilitate double- sided printing .

CITY OF
F(}LSON{

DISTIXCTIVE BY NATURE

04/11/2023 Item No.3.
:i .i rr . , , ;"-; i-i r'r'[
! ::i!i:lra l. !',Ii
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Representatives from the Folsom Tourism Bureau (FTB) will provide an annual report. No action is requested of the City Council.

AUTHORITY / RULE
The agreement between the City of Folsom and the FTB relative to the Folsom Business Improvement District requires the FTB to prepare a report for the City Council for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied.

Folsom Municipal Code section 3.100.100 specifies that the annual report shall include:

A. A description of the activities conducted during the previous fiscal year; B. An accounting of the revenue and expenditures by program for the previous fiscal year in a form and manner required by the city finance department; C. A proposed scope of activities to be provided for the next fiscal year, along with the designated staff to administer the proposed programs; D. A budget outlining the revenue and expenses for the scope of activities proposed for the next fiscal year; and
1 MEETING DATE: 4lrl12023
AGENDA SECTION: S cheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation of the Folsom Tourism Bureau Annual Report FROM: City Manager's Office

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

E. The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year and a proposal to address the surplus or deficit in the next fiscal year(s).

In addition to the information required in Folsom Municipal Code section 3.100.100, section 2(B) of the agreement requires that the following information and detail shall be provided as part ofthe annual report:
(a) A detailed description of the activities to be pursued by the FTB with FTBID funds for the coming fiscal year.

A detailed breakdown of expenses for the prior fiscal year by program type and administrative expenses and costs.
(b)
(c) A copy of the bi-annual audited financial report for the FTBID

ATTACHMENTS

1. Memo from President/CEO of Folsom Tourism Bureau Joe Gagliardi

2. Statement of Activities

3. Audited Financial Statements
Respectfu lly submitted,
Elaine Andersen
City Manager
2 Page 12
04/11/2023 Item No.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F @visitolsom
TO Elaine Andersen
City Manager
City of Folsom
FROM Joseph P. Gagliardi
PresidenVCEO
Folsom Tourism Bureau
Folsom Tourism Bureau lmprovement District
Fiscal Y ear: 7 -1 -2021 through 6-30-2022
ln accordance with the Agreement between the City of Folsom and the Folsom Tourism Bureau dated November 27 ,2012, the following Annual Report describes the activities undertaken during the fiscal year July 1,2021, through June 30,2022.

Organizational Background: The Folsom Tourism Bureau was formed in the year 2000 to focus on the growing local market for tourism development. ln 2002 the Tourism Bureau pursued forming a business improvement district (BlD) to strategically grow tourism in Folsom while providing a sustainable funding source to market Folsom as a destination. The Tourism Bureau immediately engaged all its hotel partners to seek their input and developed a strategy to accomplish that objective. The Tourism BID (TBID) was formed in 2003 at a rate of 2 percent for an initialS-yeartimeframe and then renewed foran additional5 years. |n2012, the Tourism BID was renewed al4o/o for an additional 2O-year term.
ln 2016, the Greater Folsom Partnership, now known as Choose Folsom, was formed to leverage the efforts of the Folsom Tourism Bureau in conjunction with the Folsom Chamber of Commerce and Folsom Economic Development brands. This structure facilitates an integrated marketing and communication strategy for Folsom and promotes a strong connection between the business and hospitality communities.

The ultimate goal of the Folsom Tourism Bureau programs and services is to promote positive economic benefit for the City of Folsom through increasing occupancy and ADR (Average Daily Rate) in Folsom hotels. lncreased activity increases TOT (Transit Occupancy Tax) and sales tax revenue as well as a residual economic benefit for related market segments in dining, retail, outdoor recreation and entertainment. ln addition, it has become increasingly apparent that destination promotion is a crucial tool that is used to assist in broader economic development issues - not just marketing to the end traveler. Promoting Folsom raises our community profile, opens the door for enhanced opportunities for traditional business relocation, expansion, and new startups to occur. Our destination promotion will also contribute substantially to highlighting the quality-of-life issues critical to the relocation decision as well as our residents' attitude about where they live.

RE
I

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F @visitolsom
Description of the Activities conducted durinq the previous fiscal vear: (7/1/2021 to 6t30t221
Groups & Events Supported with Concierge Service: Visit Folsom actively supports community events that bring outof-town guests. This support included a combination of marketing staff support and financial support in event underwriting and trades. We supported several events last year; a few are listed below. Events that are well run and compatible with the assets and venues in Folsom are essentialto our brand development and increase tax revenue in the region.
a
July 2021 Paddle Splash Festival
August 2021 - Wildfire Support (supported Back Bistro dinner, gift baskets, gift cards, ice cream social at each hotel property)
September 2021 - Hangtown Motocross (usually in May)
October 2021 - Folsom Blues Breakout Half Marathon
November 2021 - Rio del Lago '1OO-Mile Run
November 2021 - Folsom Women's Conference
November 2021 - Foothill Wine Festival
December 2021 - California lnternational Marathon
May 2022 - California Community College Baseball Championship Chanqes ln Personal December & Naviqatinq the New Normal o The first part of the 2021-2Q22fiscal year was spent navigating back to a new normal after the pandemic. Events were slow to resume, and corporate travel has been even slower to return. Tourism in Folsom is an integral part of the economy. While the economic benefit started to rebound, it was clear the changing marketplace with various forces at play had presented our destination with new realities. At the end of December 2021, Mary Ann McAlea retired from the Folsom Tourism Bureau after eighteen years of service, and Sally Buchanan was hired in late March 2022. Sally spent the first couple of months on a listening tour with Folsom's eight hotel partners and worked with Choose Folsom to understand the market and needs of our stakeholders.

After gathering data and feedback, Visit Folsom determined the need for a review of existing programs and a new strategy to guide marketing and organizational efforts going forward. ln July of 2Q22, the TEDCorp Board approved a strategic planning project. This project started in August 2022 and is designed to develop an organizational strategy that finds a balance between tourism, residents, and the experience for both, as well as to elevate the role of tourism in Folsom. This process also includes an analysis of tourism amenities and technology, and investment in these areas is expected to require an increase in funding. Visit Folsom held four stakeholder focus groups in August and September and is currently working on a visitor survey. The process will be wrapped up with a strategic plan report due in early December.
2

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F @visitolsom
New ln itiatives Starte d in 2022-2023
. Strategic Visioning: Planning for Visit Folsom marketing and organizational efforts is under way and will be finished in early December of 2022' New website and content: The website is undergoing a major overhaul including a new back-end system, new content, navigation and technology that will allow a better user experience.

Online Booking Engine: RootRez technology will allow Visit Folsom to seamlessly integrate a branded booking engine into our website and highlight destination-specific attributes through custom promotions, packages, maps, content, filters, and more.

Data: The Zartico Destination Operating System@ takes intelligence, analytics, and data visualizations and combines it with context and strategic input to support a Destination Management Organization's data-driven decisions in realtime. Zartico's Destination Operating System@ has the capability to track tourism effects on locally owned businesses to foster community and improve resident satisfaction. 50 Economic Alliance: Choose Folsom has partnered with our partners along the eastern Highway 50 corridor, Rancho Cordova, El Dorado County, El Dorado Hills, and Placerville. We work together to showcase everything our region offers for existing and new businesses, their employees, and their customers. This alliance naturally extends to Tourism, and we will continue to foster alignment in these areas using data points received from Zartico.

Bandwango: The Foothill Wine Passport features 37 wineries in one pass and the opportunity to taste allthe amazing wine the region has to offer. The Foothill Wine Tasting Pass is the gateway to the Sierra Foothillwineries. The pass is a digital ticket to custom tours and discounted tastings throughout the foothills. Each pass is delivered instantly via text message or email. There is no need to download an app because the pass is accessible on the user's phone at any time. ln just seconds, the purchaser will have their pass in hand and ready to taste wine!
Visitor Center Experience: This generation of travelers do not see the value in traditional visitor centers as did previous generations. The traditional model of maps, brochures, and friendly staff does not drive traffic. Given this, we have decided to create an experiential space for our visitors and customers to enjoy. The space is presently being referred to as the Visit Folsom General Store & Foothill Makers Market. Guests will not only be able to find out about Folsom, but they will also be able to grab a to-go snack, purchase high-quality Folsom souvenirs and support local makers by buying homemade wares from Folsom or the surrounding foothill region.
a
o
a
a
a
-)

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F @visitolsom
a
a
HootBoard Kiosk: The new Visitor Center & General Store will include an interactive digital kiosk meant to engage visitors and help visitors and residents find attractions, information, and more. The kiosks may eventually be placed in all Folsom hotels if the first proves successful.

Economic Development Team: Choose Folsom brought on Laura Fickle to help support Economic Development and Tourism.

Continued lnitiatives
Expanded Network of Event Promoters: Visit Folsom has devoted additional staff resources to extending the outreach for new events that complement our existing resources and hotel mix.

For events that meet our criteria of "fit" and potentialfor generating room nights, we enter a short-term underwriting sponsorship agreement to assist in the launch process for a new event. Building strong relationships with event promoters requires a willingness to support them as they work through the permitting and planning process with local partners.

Leverage the Marketing Efforts of Choose Folsom: Folsom's primary message in both economic development and tourism is the outstanding quality of life in Folsom and easy access to the best outdoor recreation in the region. This allows us to commit staff resources and dollars to add to our digital asset portfolio, public relations, and overall marketing for content that can be shared across both platforms. This gives us a tremendous advantage that would not be available if these organizations were siloed and limited by their respective areas of focus.

Coordination of Tourism & Economic Development Activities: The Choose Folsom team conducts corporate calling, identifies all potential inventory in the commercial realestate market, and serves as the primary point of communication for all new business inquiries.

The Choose Folsom teams actively participate with the Greater Sacramento Economic Councilto elevate Folsom's profile in the region.

Granite School & the Northern California lnnovation District: Choose Folsom has established the Northern California lnnovation District (NCID). This project empowers innovation, growth, and education with respect to all sectors of the Region and our communities, leveraging the reinvention of existing resources to support the sustainable future growth of the Region. NCID strives to connect, educate, develop, and promote the region and our community. With the spirit of groMh alive in NCID's headquarters at the historic Granite School, NCID ensures that education, innovation, and growth... past, present, and future... come together for a bright future for our Region.

Acquire Additional Digital Assets to use Across all Platforms: Folsom is a highly visual destination, and high-quality photos and videos are more powerful than any narrative we can provide. As social media and websites are the primary vehicles for outreach, the caliber of the content defines the perception of Folsom and effectively answers the "why" a
a
4 a

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

Visitor Services
o Visitor Collateral: The Choose Folsom team creates, writes, and produces a wide variety of print materials that are the cornerstone of our visitor outreach for all market segments including business, leisure, and residents. During this fiscalyear much of what we 6aO on hand had been depleted during COVID. Collateralwill be a major focus in 2022-2023. ltems to be redesigned include the Dining Guide and the Getting Around Folsom map. We will also continue to work with our partners to showcase other popular pieces of collateral, such as the Folsom Trail map. the 2023 edition of Folsom Magazine hit the shelves on October 31. The magazine is mailed to all homes in the region and showcased in our 1000 hotel rooms.
a
a
a
F @visitolsom
(why would I visit, why would I consider moving my business) through visual storytelling.

We freely share these assets with our partners as well as businesses for their respective platforms. We continue to acquire digital assets and have recently cataloged allvideo in a software program called Muse, which allows us to more readily find what assets we have. This facilitates using the video more effectively.

Social Media: Facebook, Linkedln, and lnstagram continue as valuable platforms for the Visit Folsom social media presence. We also share content on our Choose Folsom- sponsored event pages to maximize our investment in content development. We also use these sites and the audience we have built to support non-profit partners in their efforts to reach a larger local audience. The budget is allocated for social media advertising and boosted posts to ensure engagement.

Visitor Services Highlights: Visit Folsom is proud of the resources available in the Visitor Center. As mentioned, the Visitor Center is currently undergoing a remodel and will reopen in the new year to offer an even better experience for our guests.

Throughout the course of the year, Visit Folsom receives requests from stakeholders to provide customized welcome packets for incoming groups with maps, dining guides, Folsom swag, etc. Custom visitor packets are prepared for incoming groups at the request of hoteliers, groups, new residents and major employers.

Visit Folsom Concierge Services: \Mile Visit Folsom is a relatively small bureau, we do offer a high level of service for incoming groups who are seeking support to plan their conference or meeting. Our initial point of contact can come directly through a group considering Folsom as a host city or through a hotel partner looking for some additional support to win a piece of business that is desirable for Folsom Services include:

Itinerary development
Recommendations for ancillary venues such as banquet dining, group meeting space, etc.

Resources such as our transportation incentive, which will allow a group to recoup a portion of their shuttle expense
5

04/11/2023 Item No.4.
a
F @visitolsom
lntroductions to partners such as FHDA, zoo staff, or others for event development
Underwriting food/drink options like Snooks, Happy Hours or other hospitality opportunities
Visit Folsom Marketing Committee: The Visit Folsom team meets monthly with the Director of Sales/General Managers from our eight partner properties. The meeting is an opportunity to share trends in the market, review questions on Folsom developments and create strategic plans to continue to grow the tourism revenue. We move the meeting location monthly to restaurants or entertainment venues to showcase new producfs and share what is new in Folsom. This group discusses economic development news and businesses which are considering moving into our market, as this is a big area of interest for our hotels. These monthly meetings were finally resumed in person this past July.

Regional Collaboration: Folsom's partnership with the Gold Country Visitor's AssociationA/isit CA continues to bring increased visibility for Folsom as a highlight on regional itineraries and provides access to marketing opportunities that would be beyond the reach of our local budget. Access to international visitor markets, collaboration on regional tours and representation in the CA State Visitor Guides are just a few of the benefits of this partnership.

Additionally, paftnerships with Rancho Cordova Travel & Tourism, Visit El Dorado County, and now the 50 Economic Alliance are a great benefit as collaboration often allows us to host larger groups than any one market can handle alone' The Folsom Transportation Program: This campaign has started to heat up again as we come out of COVID and continues to perform wellfor our local hotels. Weddings, fami[ reunions, and large business team building which meet the 1O-rooml0ight minimum are utilizing this shuttle incentive. The promotion is supported by social media and print ads in Real Weddings Magazine, as well as sales kits for each hotel partner. There is also a tremendous referral base from satisfied customers. We continue to allocate the budget for this campaign with the objective of driving more leisure travel. We are now also experimenting with a shuttle program that helps small business groups get to and from the airport and around town.

An accountinq of the revenue and expenditures for the previous fiscal vear: (7/1/21 to 6r30t221
. During this fiscal year funds were collected from the eight Folsom hotels (Lake Natoma lnn, Fairfield lnn & Suites, Hampton lnn, Hilton Garden, Larkspur Landing, Marriott Residence lnn and Marriott Courtyard, Staybridge lnn & Suites). The total amount of revenue for FY 21-22 was $1 ,247,213. The total projected expenditures through June 30,2022, for this fiscal year is $788,594.
a
6

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F Gvisitolsom
An estimate of the cost of the activities for '22-'23 fiscal vear: (7/{/22 to 6/30/23) o The Folsom Tourism Bureau expects proceeds from the BID to be $1,309,500 for the timeframe of 711122-6130123. The contributors include eight hotels (Lake Natoma lnn, Fairfield lnn & Suites, Hampton lnn, Hilton Garden, Larkspur Landing, Marriott Residence lnn, Marriott Gourtyard, and Staybridge lnn & Suites). Expenditures are anticipated to be approximately $1,088,000.

The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year: The Folsom Tourism Bureau is currently analyzing tourism amenities and technology through a strategic planning process, and investment in these areas is expected to rise.
7

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

Folsom Tourism and
Econom ic Development Gorporation
Statement of Activities
June 30,2022
WD Actual
FY 21-22
Approved
Budget
Revenue
2021-22 Fundino
BID - Q1 (Jan-Mar 22 from CitY)
BID - Q2 (Apr-Jun 22lrom CitY)
BID - Q3 (Jul-Sept 21 from City)
BID - Q4 (Oct-Dec 21 from City)
Total BID Revenue
lnterest income
Other lncome:

Event Board lncome
Other lncome
Total Revenue
Expenses
Business & Event Attraction
Contract LaboriPayroll
Cost of Sales - Event Boards & Visitors Center
Depreciation Expense
Facilities
Marketing
Office Expenses
Professional Fees
Events, SponsorshiPs, Studies
Transportation
Total Expenses
lncrease/(Decrease) ln Net Assets
Add back non-cash expense - depreciation
lncrease/(Decrease) ln Net Assets (before non-cash expense) 265,045
315,885
348,352
310,431
187,700
240,700
238,300
231 000
1,239,713
4,263
1,330
907
897,700
100
1,000
1,247.213 898,800
50,000
249,956
6,653
5,456
10,000
34,408
64,023
41,829
319,737
6,532
50,000
233,500
5,000
8,000
10,000
106,500
75,000
40,000
350,000
12,500
788.594 990,500
$ 458,619 $ 8,300
$ 5,+56 $ 8,ooo
$ 464,075 $ 16,300

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

Folsom Tourism ond Economic
Developmenl Corporolion
Audited Finonciql Slqlemenls
For the yeor ended June 30, 2022
.:L : : I l:j* il i:::i i. j :.:: | ! i'r i::::

YOUR NEEDS OUR BUSINESS

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Financial Statements
Table of Contents
Page
lndependent Auditor's Report
Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Position
Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets
Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
L
3 5
7 8

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

F

YOUR NEEDS OUR BUSINESS
lndependent Auditor's Report
To the Board of Directors
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Folsom, California
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (a nonprofit organization), which comprise the statement of financial position as of June 30, 2022, and the related statements of activities and changes in net assets and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements' ln our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation as of June 30,2022, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation and to meet our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
ln preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whetherthere are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued.
950 Glenn Drive, suite 125 | Folsom, cA 95630 | Phonel 9L6.400.0022 | www.apcpagroup.com

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control, Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
ln performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, we c Exercise professionaljudgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. o ldentify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
o Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. o Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
o Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internalcontrol related matters that we identified during the audit.

AP I Groupl lnc
Folsom, California
<REPORT DATE>
2

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Statement of Financial Position
lune3O,2O22
Assets
Current assets
Cash
Contributions receiva ble
Related party receivables
Current portion of note receivable - related party
Prepaid expenses
Prepaid rent - related party
Total current assets
Noncurrent assets
Equipment, net
Note receivable - related party, net of current portion Prepaid rent - related party
Total noncurrent assets
Total assets
s 930,515
347,129
8,045
17,595
t,3t5
9,000
1,313,500
76,557
61,318
70,L85
r48,O6t
s L,46r,66t
3 See accompanying notes and accountant's report.

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Statement of Financial Position
lune3O,2O22
tiabilities and Net Assets
Current liabilities
Related party payable
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current portion
Total liabilities
Net assets
With donor restrictions
Total liabilities and net assets
s 73,461
3,375
76,836
154,986
23r,822
L,229,839
$ L,46L,66t
4 See accompanying notes and accountant's report.

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Net assets released from restrictions
Expenses
Program expenses
Business and event attraction
Contract labor
Event underwriting
Marketing
Office expenses
Transportation
Total program expenses
General and administrative expenses
Contract labor
Depreciation
Dues and subscriptions
Education and seminars
lnterest expense
Licenses and permits
Office expenses
Professional fees
Rent
Total general and administrative expenses
Total expenses
Change in net assets without donor restrictions
s 788,594
50,000
395,527
L6L,948
85,810
4,694
6,532
704,505
L7,4t3
5,456
2,800
550
4,056
44 3,174
41,346
9,250
84,089
788,594
5 See accompanying notes and accountant's report'

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets
For the year ended lune 30, 2O22
Net assets with donor restrictions
Business improvement district revenue
Event board revenue
Visitor center sales
Other income
Less net assets released from restrictions
Change in net assets with donor restrictions
lncrease in total net assets
Net assets, luly L,2O2l
Net assets, June 30, 2022
r,243,976
1,330
51 1,855
788,594
458,6L9
458,519
77L,22O
S t,zzg,839
6 See accompanying notes and accountant's report.

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Cash flows from operating activities
Change in net assets
Adjustments to reconcile net assets to net cash
provided by operating activities:

Depreciation expense
Accrued interest expense
(lncrease) decrease in assets:

Contributions receivable
Related party receivables
Prepaid expenses
Prepaid rent - related PartY
lncrease (decrease) in liabilities:

Related party payables
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments received on note receivable - related party
Net increase in cash
Cash at beginning of year
Cash at end of year
s 458,619
5,456
4,056
(10,320)
(8,046)
(1,315)
9,000
(3,5471
453,903
19,598
473,501
457,0I4
s 930,515
7 See accompanying notes and accountant's report.

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the Financial Statements
lune3O,2022

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations: The Organization's purpose is to encourage sound and beneficial tourism development in the City of Folsom by promoting the growth and development of tourism. The Organization will also encourage sound and beneficial economic development to improve business conditions and promote the common interests of Folsom businesses.

Basis of Accounting: The Organization records income using the accrual method of accounting for both financial reporting and income tax purposes. Under this method, income is recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred.

Use of Estimates: Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differfrom these estimates.
@[: For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Organization considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Contribution Receivables: Contribution receivables are recognized when the donor makes a contribution to the Organization that is, in substance, unconditional. Contribution receivables that are restricted by the donor are reported as increases in temporarily restricted net assets or permanently restricted net assets depending on the existence or nature of any donor restrictions, When a restriction expires, temporarily restricted assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets. Contribution receivables are due in less than one year.

Equipment: The Organization capitalizes equipment over St,00O. Equipment is carried at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset using the straight-line method. Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. Upon retirement or disposal of equipment and leasehold improvements, the costs and related depreciation are removed from the accounts, and gain or loss, if any, is reflected in the earnings. The estimated useful lives used for calculating depreciation are as follows:

Computer equipment
Furniture and fixtures
5 years
3 - 7 years
8

04/11/2023 Item No.4.
ffiffiATT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the FinancialStatements
lune3O,2O22
lmpairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carry amount of such assets may not be recoverable.

Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount, lf the operation is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount of its assets, then the assets are written down first, followed by other long-lived assets of the operation to fair value, Fairvalue is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets. There were no impairment losses recognized for long-lived assets as of June 30,2022.

Contributions: Contributions received are recorded as net assets with donor restrictions or net assets without donor restrictions depending on the absence or existence and nature of any donor restrictions. lncome Taxes: The Organization is exempt from federal income taxes under Section 501(cX6) of the lnternal Revenue Code, except on net income derived from unrelated business activities. The Organization may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. Examples of tax positions include the tax-exempt status of the Organization and various positions related to the potential sources of unrelated business taxable income. The Organization's open audit periods are 2018, 2OIg,2O2O and 202t. The Organization has analyzed its tax positions taken for filings with the lnternal Revenue Service and the state of California. The Organization believes that its income tax filing positions will be sustained upon examination and does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material adverse effect on the Organization's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Organization to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash ihvestments and receivables. The Organization places its temporary cash investments with financial institutions, and those balances may exceed the federally insured limit on occasion.

Contributions receivable from one city represented approximately all of total contributions receivable as of June 30,2022. Revenue from one city represented approximately all of total revenue forthe year ended June 30,2022.

Functional Expenses: Expenses are charged to programs and general and administrative expenses based on their natural classification. Accordingly, certain costs have been allocated among various programs and general and administrative expenses based on estimates made by the Organization. General administrative expenses include those expenses that are not directly identifiable with any other specific function but provide overallsupport and direction of the Organization. Allocation methods are based on contract labor time incurred and on resource usage.
9

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the Financial Statements
lune3O,2O22
Recent Accountins Pronouncements: ln February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which, among other things, requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the statement of financial position of lessees, along with the disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements.

The Organization is currently evaluating the effects of this ASU on its financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Organization's year ending June 30, 2023, with early adoption permitted.

Subsequent Events: Management has evaluated subsequent events through xxxxxxx, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

2. Liquidity and Availability of FinancialAssets
The following reflects the Organization's financial assets as of the financial position date, reduced by amounts not available for general use because of contractual or donor-imposed restrictions within one year of the statement of financial position date.

Cash
Contributions receivable
Related party receivables
Less net assets with donor restrictions
5 930,515
347,129
8,046
!,229,839
Financial assets available to meet cash needs for general expenditures within one year s 55,851
As part of the Organization's liquidity management, it invests cash in excess of daily requirements in checking accounts,
10

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the Financial Statements
lune3O,2O22

3. Note Receivable - Related PartY
Note receivable - related party represents amounts due from Folsom Community Development Corporation totaling $78,9L3 as of June 30, 2022. Monthly payments receivable under the note are S1,887. The note accrues interest at 5.00% per annum and is due May 31, 2O26.The Organization received 54,204 of interest on this note for the year ended June 30,2022.

4. Equipment
Equipment consists of the following as of June 30,2022:

Computer equipment
Furniture and fixtures
s 7,260
79,529
Total equipment 86,789
Less accumulated depreciation 70,232
Equipment, net s 16,557
Depreciation expense charged to general and administrative expenses amounted to 55,455 for the year ended June30,2O22.

L1"

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the Financial Statements
lune3O,2O22

5. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:

SBA Economic lnjury Disaster Loan, secured by
all assets, monthly payments of 5641, including
principal and interest, due in May 2050
Payable
lnterest
Rate
Within
One Year
After
One Year
Aggregate maturities on long-term debt over the next five years are as follows:

Year endins June 30:

2.7s% s 3,375 s 154,986
s 3,375
3,474
3,570
3,570
3,772
140,500
s L58,361
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
After 2027
t2

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

DRAFT
Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation
Notes to the FinancialStatements
lune3O,2O22

5. leasing
The Organization leases warehouse space under a non-cancelable operating lease with Folsom Community Development Corporation expiring in June 2025. Rent expense included in general and administrative expenses amounted to 59,250 forthe year ended June 30, 2022.fhe Organization has prepaid future lease payments totaling S79,186 as of June 30,2022.

7. Net Assets with Donor Restrictions
Net assets with donor restrictions as of June 30, 2022 represent the unexpended portion of business improvement district income received from the City of Folsom.

8. Related Party Transactions
During the year ended June 30,2o22,the Organization paid 53+3,9S6 to a related entity, Folsom Chamber of Commerce, for reimbursement of personnel and office expenses and 585,000 for expenses related to supporting community events, including labor costs, consulting, marketing, and event support expenses.

The Organization also paid 5213,797 to Folsom Community Development Corporation for expenses related to economic development.
lncluded in related party receivables and payables as of June 30,2122is 58,045 due from Folsom Chamber of Commerce and 573,461 due to Folsom Community Development Corporation.

The Organization has a note receivable due from Folsom Community Development Corporation totaling 578,913 as ofJune 30,2022 (see note 3).

The Organization has a non-cancelable operating lease with Folsom Community Development Corporation (see note 5).

9. Contingency
The Organization's agreement with the City of Folsom relative to the Folsom Tourism Business lmprovement District expired on Decembe r 37,2022. The five year extension has not been approved and management expects the agreement to be extended upon review of the annual report.

L3

04/11/2023 Item No.4.

Book77 Page 61
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023
Gity Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, March 28,2023 6:00 PM

GALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent:

Participating Staff:

None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steve Wang
Deputy City Clerk Lydia Konopka
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: Human Resources Advisor John Spittler. Employee Organization: City of Folsom Police Department Middle Management Employees
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, to adjourn to closed session for the above referenced item. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 39 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 62
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023

ADJOURNMENT
The special meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m SUBMITTED BY:

Lydia Konopka, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 40 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book 77 Page 63
Folsom Ci$ Council
March 28,2023
City Gouncil Regular Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, March 28,2023 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent
Participating Staff:

None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
Deputy City Clerk Lydia Konopka
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
Environmental and Water Resources Director Marcus Yasutake Communications Director Christine Brainerd
Senior Planner Stephanie Henry
Community Development Director Pam Johns
Principal Planner Steve Banks
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
Public Works Director Mark Rackovan

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that there was a revised staff report and additional information for item 13.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 41 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book 77 Page 64
Folsom City Gouncil
March 28,2023
BUSINESS THE FLOOR:

The following speakers addressed the City Council

1. Beverly Siess regarding the winter shelter

2. Jennifer Lane regarding River District Ad Hoc Committee

3. Ethan Walker regarding SB54
SGHEDULED PRESENTATIONS :

1. Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (TEDCorp) Quarterly Report TEDCorp CEO Joe Gagliardi introduced the item. Choose Folsom representatives Laura Fickle, Phil Scott, and Daniel Kaye of Bekonix made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

GONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

2. Approval of March 14,2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

3. Ordinance No. 1337 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Eagle Commercial Properties, LLC Relative to the Folsom South Specific Plan (Second Reading and Adoption)

4. pulled for comment

5. Resolution No. 11008 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Folsom and the City of Folsom Fire Department Middle Management Employees (CFFDMM E)

6. Resolution No. 11009 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Folsom and the Folsom Middle Management Group (FMMG) 7 . Resolution No. 1 1013 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with NBS Government Financing Group for Assessment Engineering Services

8. Resolution No. 11014 - A Resolution Directing the Preparation of Engineer's Report for the Following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflections ll, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 42 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 65
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023

9. pulled for comment
Motion by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, to approve items 2-3 and 5-8 of the Consent Galendar.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
GONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION:

9. 2022 General Plan (and Housing Element) Annual Progress Report Mayor Rosario Rodriguez pulled item 9 at the request of Loretta Hettinger who addressed the City Council regarding the history of Folsom.

Motion by Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, second by Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, to approve the Annual Progress Report.

Motion carried with the following roll callvote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None

4. Resolution No. 1 1006 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with McGuire and Hester for the Construction of the Greenback Sewer and Lift Station No. 3 Project and Appropriation of Funds
Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla pulled the item for clarification and to make a motion. Environmental and Water Resources Director Marcus Yasutake responded. City Attorney Steve Wang provided additional clarification.

Motion by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to reiect all bids.

Motion failed with the following roll callvote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Gouncilmember(s): Ghalamcherla
Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Rodriguez Gouncilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): None
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council

04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book 77 Page 66
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023
Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 11006.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Rodriguez Gouncilmember(s): Chalamcherla
Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): None
PUBLIC HEARING:

10. Amendment to City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No.2
i. Resolution No. 1 1010 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Calling a Special Mailed-Ballot Election Related to Change Proceedings for lmprovement Area No. 2 within City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) ii. Resolution No. 11011 - A Resolution of Change of the City Council of the City of Folsom Relating to lmprovement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch)
iii. Ordinance No. 1338 -An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax forthe Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to lmprovement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (lntroduction and First Reading)
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni made a presentation.

Mayor Rosario Rodriguez opened the public hearing and asked if there were any protests or public comments. There were none.

Mayor Rosario Rodriguez asked if there was a majority protest for CFD No. 23. Deputy City Clerk Lydia Konopka confirmed that there was no majority protest. Mayor Rodriguez stated that because there is no majority protest the City Council may consider the resolution.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 11010.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez asked the City Clerk to conduct the election and proceed to canvas. Deputy DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council

04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 67
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023
City Clerk Lydia Konopka stated she received the ballots, and declared the election closed. She read the canvas results and explained that the votes are one hundred percent in favor of the measure.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 11011.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, to introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1338.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez closed the public hearing
NEW BUSINESS:

11. Proposed Historic Folsom Property & Business lmprovement District i. Resolution 11007 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Sign the Petition and Ballot on Behalf of the City of Folsom in Support of the Renewal of the Historic Folsom Property and Business lmprovement District
Communications Director Christine Brainerd introduced the item and Folsom Historic District Association President Jim Snook made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowskito approve Resolution No. 11007.

Motion carried with the following roll callvote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 45 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book 77 Page 68
Folsom Ci$ Council
March 28,2023

12. Housing Element Program H-2 - Additional Housing Capacity Buildout Assumptions Analysis and Recommendations
Senior Planner Stephanie Henry made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. Additional clariflcation was provided by City Attorney Steve Wang.

The following speaker addressed the City Council:
o JudiAlexander
Community Development Director Pam Johns confirmed that City Council direction to staff was to proceed with the assumptions which staff will study and bring back to the City Council.

13. Appeal by Katharine Gray of Decisions by the Planning Commission Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Approving a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, and Density Bonus for Development of the 136-unit Vintage Senior Apartments project (PN 21-259) Located at 103 East Natoma Street Mayor Rosario Rodriguez opened the public hearing and summarized the proceedings of the appeal hearing.

Principal Planner Steve Banks made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

City Attorney Steven Wang provided additional clarification.

The appellant team consisting of Kat Gray, Erin Sergeant and Henry Sundermier made a presentation.

The applicant team consisting of attorney Robert Holderness, project manager Jennifer VanGerpen and civil engineer Chris Schulze made a presentation and responded to questions of the City Council.

The following speakers addressed the City Council:

1. Kandi Jones in opposition

2. JudiAlexander in oPPosition

3. Bob Maechler in opposition

4. Nancy Coe in opposition

5. Art Jones in opposition
6 Jean Sundermier in oPPosition

7. Henry Sundermier in opPosition

8. Eli in opposition

9. Teresa Golden-Okson in opposition
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez called for a five-minute recess at 9:19 pm and reconvened the City Council meeting at 9:25 pm.

Appellant Erin Sergeant made rebuttal comments.

Applicant representative Bob Holderness made rebuttal comments.

At the request of Councilmember Sarah Aquino, Principal Planner Steve Banks responded to questions asked by the speakers during public comment. City Attorney Steven Wang provided legal clarification.

Applicant Jennifer VanGerpen responded to questions from the City Council.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 46 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book77 Page 69
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023
The City Council commented and discussed the project. City staff and the applicant's team responded to questions from the City Council and provided clarification.

Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski to deny the appeal with changes to conditions No. 3 to change the approval length of the project entitlements from three years to two years, and Condition No. 54 to eliminate the requirement for specially designated guest parking spaces.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): Rohrbough
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
OLD BUSINESS:

14. Resolution No. 11015 - A Resolution Adopting the City of Folsom Strategic Plan, FY2023-24 through FY2027-28
City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation. and responded to questions from the City Council Councilmember Sarah Aquino requested changes to the Goal C: Economic and Community Development Strategies section: change no. 9 to begin sooner and change no. 13 to begin later. City Manager Elaine Andersen received consensus from the City Council for those changes.

There was more discussion between the City Council and clarification with City Manager Elaine Andersen.

Motion by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino to approve Resolution No. 11015.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None

COUNGIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez requested a future agenda item to consider formation of an ad hoc committee for budget oversight and future financial needs.

DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 47 04/11/2023 Item No.5.

Book 77 Page 70
Folsom City Council
March 28,2023
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:

City Manager Elaine Andersen announced that the Landscape Festival was a successful event and thanked everyone involved.

GOUNGIL GOMMENTS:

Councilmember Sarah Aquino thanked everyone involved in the Landscape Festival. She thanked Police Lieutenant Chris Emery for joining her at the State Capitol regarding Assembly Bill 742. She asked that City Manager Elaine Andersen send a letter opposing the bill.

Councilmember Mike Kozlowski discussed meetings he attended of the Regional Transit and SACOG boards and encouraged everyone to attend the upcoming track meet at Folsom High School.

Councilmember Anna Rohrbough thanked Councilmember Kozlowski for sending her information regarding one of his committees.

Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla commented regarding meeting with Regional Transit members and that he is going on the Cap to Cap trip next month.

Mayor Rosario Rodriguez spoke of attending upcoming events of the kick-off for the American River 50 Mile Endurance Run and the Arts Academy Jazz Festival. She commended Deputy Fire Marshal Michelle Toledo for a great job with her recent business inspection and thanked the Deputy City Clerk for clerking the meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Rosario Rodriguez adjourned the meeting at 11:05 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

Lydia Konopka, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not of.ficiql until approved by the City Council Page 48 04/11/2023 Item No.5.
'I i l. 'r'f
lt t:Jr'?:

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNEIL AEIIQN
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the second reading and move to adopt the following ordinance:

Ordinance No. 1338 - An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan ("PFFP"), approved by the City Council on January 28, 2014 via Resolution 9298, is an $877 million plan that describes the backbone infrastructure and facility requirements, presents a comprehensive financing strategy, and sets forth the estimated time horizon for the development of the Folsom Plan Area ("FPA").

The City Council previously approved the Resolution of Formation (Resolution No. 10435) and the Resolution Deeming it Necessary to Incur Bonded Indebtedness (Resolution No. 10437) on May 26,2020 to form Community Facilities DistrictNo. 23 (Folsom Ranch) ("CFD No. 23"), designate Improvement Area No. 2, authorize a special tax to finance the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities and certain public services, authorize the issuance MEETING DATE: 4^U2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1338 - An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)
FROM: Finance Department
1

04/11/2023 Item No.6.
of debt to finance the public facilities, and establish the appropriations limit and maximum bonded indebtedness for Improvement Area No. 2.

The landowners within Improvement AreaNo .2haverequested to amend the Rate and Method of Apportionment to adjust the maximum special tax rates based on the planned development of property within Improvement AreaNo .2.The proposed development plan for Improvement Area No. 2 includes 291 units zoned as multi-family low density and 5.1 acres of non- residential use.

On February 14, 2023 this City Council considered to amend the Rate and Method of Apportionment for Improvement Area No. 2 by passage of Resolution No. 10988.

A Public Hearing and landowner election was conducted March 28,2023. At that time, the following resolutions were approved by the Council:
1 . Resolution No. 1 1 0l 0 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Calling a Special Mailed-Ballot Election Related to Change Proceedings for Improvement Area No. 2 within City of Folsom Community facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch)

2. Resolution No. 1 101 1 - A Resolution of Change of the City Council of the City of Folsom Relating to Improvement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch)
The results of the landowner election was 32 votes in favor of the ballot measure and zeto opposed.

POLICY / RULE
Chapter 5 of the Folsom Plan Area Public Facilities Financing Plan authorizes the formation of CFDs to finance the construction, acquisition, and servicing of FPA backbone infrastructure and public facilities
Section 2.5.3 of the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement authorizes the formation of infrastructure CFDs
Resolution No. 9282 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Acl of 1982

ANALYSIS
CFD No. 23 is structured as an extended-term CFD and will provide the necessary funding to help fund all or a portion of the project's share of PFFP backbone infrastructure and facilities, including related environmental mitigation obligations. The PFFP backbone infrastructure and 2 Page 50
04/11/2023 Item No.6.
facilities will be financed using both bond proceeds and PAYGO special tax revenues. The extended-term CFD structure is proposed to help to meet the challenge of high-cost infrastructure and facilities while also aligning the timing of future funding availability with the need for such funding.

The proposed amendment to the Rate and Method of Apportionment for Improvement Area No. 2 increases the maximum facilities special tax rates for single-family detached property.

The special tax revenue generated from taxable parcels within Improvement Area No. 2 will be comprised of a special tax to fund facilities and a special tax to fund services. The amended 2022123 maximum facilities special tax rates and maximum services special tax rates, for each land use category, are provided in the table below:

Land Use
2022123
Maximum
Facilities
Special Tax
Rate
2022123
Maximum
Services
Special Tax
Rate Per
Single-Family Detached Property - SF/SFHD
All Residential Floor Sizes $2,559.87 s2r4.s6 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
Zonins, (> 3,600 square feet) 2,559.87 110.49 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
a
J 99
2,559.87 ttO.49 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
-3 r99 2,559.87 110.49 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
799 feet 2,559.87 110.49 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
Zonins. Q.000-2.399 square feet) 2,359.41 110.49 Unit
Single-Family Detached Property - MLD
000 feet 2,123.92 t10.49 Unit
MMD Multi-Family Attached Property 31,212.00 536.40 Acre MHD Multi-Family Attached Property 12,172.68 1,072.80 Acre Non-Residential Property 12,172.68 1,072.80 Acre
The facilities special tax can be levied and collected through Fiscal Year 2079180. Each fiscal year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2023124, the maximum facilities special tax rate will be increased by 2% annually. The services special tax can be levied and collected in perpetuity for Improvement Area No. 2. Each fiscal year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2023124, the maximum services special taxrate will be increased by the June annualized percentage change of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area, notto exceed4Yo.
a
J Page 51
04/11/2023 Item No.6.

Ordinance 1338 authorizes the special tax to be levied on CFD No. 23 Improvement Area2 for Fiscal Year 2023124 and all subsequent years, and was introduced on March 28, 2023. No changes have been made to the ordinance since the first reading.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no direct General Fund impact on the City of Folsom. The Improvement Area No. 2 amendment and expenses are solely the responsibility of Improvement Area No. 2. The General Fund is not impacted by the Improvement Area No. 2 Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Folsom Plan Area Backbone Infrastructure Project were previously prepared for, and adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2015, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(c), the term "project" does not mean each separate govemmental approval for an approved activity which may be subject to several discretionary approvals by governmental agencies. Additionally, the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment is not defined as a ,,project,,under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(bX4) and 15061(bX3).

ATTACHMENTS
l. Ordinance No. 1338 - An Uncodified Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Following Fiscal Years Solely within and Relating to Improvement Area No. 2 within the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (Second Reading and Adoption)
Submitted,
Tamagni
Finance Director
4 Page 52
04/11/2023 Item No.6.

ORDINANCE NO. 1338

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 AND FOLLOWING FISCAL YEARS SOLELY WITHIN AND RELATING TO IMPROVEMENT AREA NO.2 WITHIN THE CITY OF FOLSOM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.23 (FOLSOM RANCH)
The City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California ordains as follows:

SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby finds, determines and declares based on the record before it that:

1. The City is authorized to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the terms of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 53311 (the "Act"); and

2. Pursuant to Section 53350 of the Act, the City is authorized to designate improvement areas within the community facilities district; and

3. Pursuant to Government Code section 53340 and Resolution No. 10435, adopted by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Folsom (the "City") on May 26,2020 (the "Resolution of Formation"), the City Council formed its Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) (the "Community Facilities District") and a rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (as amended, the "special Tax") for Improvement Area No. 2 (;Improvement Area No. 2") established therein was approved by an election of the qualified electors within Improvement Area No. 2 on such date; and

4. Pursuant to Resolution No. 10988, adopted by the City Council on February 14, 2023 (the "Resolution of Consideration") and Resolution No. 11011 adopted by the City Council on March 28, 2023 (the "Resolution of Change" and, collectively with the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Consideration, the "Resolutions"), the City Council approved an Amended Rate and Method of Apportionment for City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 2 (the "Amended Rate and Method"), which changes were approved by an election of the qualified electors within Improvement Area No. 2 on such date; and

5. The City Council desires to levy and impose the Special Tax and to take other related actions.

SECTION 2

NOW' THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
RESOLVES:

1. The recitals set forth in Section I are true and correct.

Ordinance No. 1338
Page I of3 Page 53
04/11/2023 Item No.6.

2. A special tax is hereby levied on all Taxable Property (as defined in the Amended Rate anil Method) within Improvement Area No. 2 for the 2023-24 fiscal year and for all subsequent fiscal years in the amount of the maximum authorized tax, provided that this amount may be adjusted annually, subject to the maximum authorized special tax limit, by resolution of the CitY Council.

3. The Finance Director of the City of Folsom or designee thereof (the .'CFD Administrator") is authorized and directed, to determine each year, without further action of the City Council, the Special Tax, to prepare the annual Special Tax roll in the amount of the Splcial Tax in accordance with the related exhibit and, without further action of the City Council, to provide all necessary and appropriate information to the Sacramento County Auditor-Controller's Office (the "County") in propet form, and in proper time, necessary to effect the correct and timely billing and collection of the Special Tax on the secured property tax roll of the County; provided, that as provided in the Resolutions and Section 53340 of the California Government Code, the City has reserved the right to utilize any method of collecting the Special Tax which it shall, from time to time, determine to be in the best interests of the City of Folsom (the "City"), including but not limited to, direct billing by the City to the property owners and supplemental billing.

4. The appropriate officers and agents of the City are authorized to make adjustments to the Speciai Tax roll prior to the final posting of the Special Tax to the County tax roll each fiscal year, as may be necessary to achieve a correct match of the Special Tax levy with the assessor's parcel numbers finally utilized by the County in sending out property tax bills.

5. The City agrees that, in the event the Special Tax for Improvement Area No' 2 is collected orrthe secured tax ro11 of the County, the County may deduct its reasonable and agreed charges for collecting the Special Tax from the amounts collected, prior to remitting the Special Tax collections to the City.

6. Taxpayers who have requested changes or corrections of the Special Tax pursuant to Section I of the Amended Rate and Method and who are not satisfied with the decision of the CFD Administrator (whether the CFD Administrator disagrees with the taxpayer or concludes that the City is not authorizedto consider the change requested), may appeal to the City Council. The appeal must be in writing, fully explain the grounds of appeal and must be based solely on the correction of mistakes in the levy based upon the status of the property, and no other appeals will be allowed. The CFD Administrator shall schedule the appeal for consideration within a reasonable time at aCity Council meeting.

SECTION 3 SEVERABILITY
If for any cause any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inappfitable to any particular parcel by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance, and the appiication of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels, shall not be affected.

Ordinance No. 1338

04/11/2023 Item No.6.

SECTTON 4 EFFECTIVE DATE; EFFECT ON ORDINANCE NO. 1305
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force as a tax measure thirty (30) days following its second reading and adoption at a meeting of the City Council; and before the expiration of twenty (20) days after its passage the same shall be published, with the names of the members voting for and against the same, at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the Community Facilities District.

Ordinance No. 1305 adopted by the City Council on June 9,2020, shall be superseded, solely with respect to Improvement Area No. 2, to the extent it is inconsistent with this ordinance, upon the date that this ordinance takes effect, as described in the immediately preceding paragraph.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on March 28,2023, and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on April ll,2023.
{< r! *
On a motion by seconded by the foregoing
ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this l lth day of April,2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1338

04/11/2023 Item No.6.

This page intentionallY Ieft blank
to facilitate double- side d printing .

FOLSOl\{
CI?Y OF

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE

04/11/2023 Item No.6.

Folsom Ctty Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 4/tU2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11016 - Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring its Intention to Renew the Historic Folsom Propeffy and Business Improvement District
FROM: City Manager's Office

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends approving Resolution I1016-A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring its Intention to Renew the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement Dishict (HFPBTD).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District (HFPBID) is a benefit assessment district whose main goal is to provide improvements and activities which constitute and convey a special benefit to assessed parcels. This approach has been used successfully in Historic Folsom and elsewhere throughout the country to provide special benefits to property owners, namely increased sales, attraction ofnew tenants, increased occupancies, and specifically increased property values.

The FIFPBID was created in 2008 pursuantto provisions ofthe Streets and Highway Code and City Council Resolution No. 83 l7. By statute, the initial term was limited to five years, and the City Council renewed the District for the maximum allowable term of ten years in 2013 at the request of the Folsom Historic District Association (FHDA). With the current term ending on December 31, 2023,lffPBID property owners and FHDA now wish to renew the District for another ten-year term.

I{FPBID property owners decided to pursue renewal of the FIFPBID in order to continue a revenue source devoted to providing special benefits to assessed property owners. If renewed, the F{FPBID would generate approximately $170,757.12 in assessment revenue on an annual basis for improvements and activities that are above and beyond those provided by the City and other government agencies. The assessment funds will be supplemented by non-assessment funds, so that the total budget for the initial year is estimated at $179,663 .27 .
1

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Staff is seeking adoption of the Resolution of Intention to Renew the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District (HFPBID), resulting in a public hearing on June 13,2023, to renew the I{FPBID and levy the assessments.

MANAGEMENT DISTNCT P LAN
The Management District Plan (Attachment l) includes the proposed boundary of the IIFPBID, a service plan, assessment methodology, budget, a proposed means of governance, and Engineer's Report. The ienewed HFPBID is generally bound by the Folsom Lake State Recreation area on the north and west, the Sutter Street / Figueroa Street Alley on the south, and Scott Street on the east, as shown in the map in the Management District Plan.

The FIFPBID will have a ten (10)-year-life, beginning January 1,2024, through December 31, 2033. Near the end of the term, the petition, ballot, and City Council hearing process must be repeated for the ItrPBID to be renewed for another term of up to ten ( l0) years. Once per year, beginning on the anniversary of HFPBID renewal, there is a thirty (30) day period in which property owners paying fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessment may protest and begin proceedings to terminate the ttrPBID.

As provided by State law, the HFPBID assessment will appear as a separate line item on annual property tax-bills prepared by the County of Sacramento. Parcels which do not receive property tax bills will be invoiced by the City. Property tax bills are generally distributed in the fall, and payment is expected by lump sum or installment. The County of Sacramento shall distribute funds collected to the City of Folsom, which shall forward them to the FIFPBID. Existing laws for enforcement and appeal of property taxes, including penalties and interest, apply to the HFPBID assessments.

HFPBID RENEWAL PROCESS
April 11,2023 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION HEARING
Upon the submission of a written petition, signed by the property owners in the proposed HFPBID who will pay more than 50 percent (50%) of the assessments proposed to be levied, the City Council may initiate proceedings to renew a district by the adoption ofa resolution expressing its intention to renew a district.

By April 22,2023 NOTICE & PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT
The Property and Business Improvement District L aw of 7994 and Proposition 2 1 8 require the City mail written notice and assessment ballots to the owners of all property proposed to be assessed within the renewed HFPBID. Mailing the notice and assessment ballot begins a mandatory forty-five (5) day period in which owners may cast ballots.

June 13,2023 FINAL PUBLIC FIEARING
Council will open a public hearing and receive public testimony. At the end of the testimony, Council will close the public hearing and direct tabulation of assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn to determine whether there is a majority protest against the assessment. A majority protest exists if the ballots in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the ballots in support of the proposed assessment, weighted by the amount each owner will pay. If there is no majority protest, Council may adopt a resolution declaring the results of the majority protest proceedings and renewing the HFPBID.
2 Page 58
04/11/2023 Item No.7.

POLICY / RULE
The Property and Business Improvement Law of 1994, California Streets and Highways Code section 36600
"l ,"q., authorizes cities to renew propeffy and business improvement districts for the purposes of promoting eionomic revitalization and financing activities and services to improve the overall economic climate in said districts.

ANALYSIS
Adoption of this resolution declares the City Council of the City of Folsom's intention to renew the I{FPBID.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
If the HFPBID renewal is successful, then the City's annual contribution is estimated at$82,644'22 beginning in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The Crty's assessment is a General Fund (Fund 010) expense' Future assessment rates may be subject to an increase of no more than three percent (3%) annually.

EIYVIROIIMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines $ 1 506 1(bX3).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Staff recommends approving Resolution 11016-4. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring its Intention to Renew the Historic Folsom Properly and Business Improvement District (HFPBID)

2. Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District Management District Plan and Engineer's Report
Respectfully Submitted,
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
J Page 59
04/11/2023 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT ].

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

RESOLUTION NO. 11016

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO RE,NEW THE HISTORIC FOLSOM

PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code $36600 et seq., authorizes cities to establish and renew property and business improvement districts to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities which specially benefit assessed properties; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District (HFPBID) was created in 2008, and was subsequently renewed in20l4 for a ten (10) year term; and WHEREAS, property owners now wish to renew the HFPBID for another ten (10) year term; and
WHEREAS, incorporated herein by this reference is the HFPBID Management District Plan (Plan), which provides for advocacy & program coordination, enhanced maintenance services, and an enhanced maintenance program with the intent of increasing the commercial activity and overall image of Historic Folsom; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, owners of properties within the renewed HFPBID have submitted petitions asking that City Council renew the HFPBID for a ten (10) year term. Included with each petition was a Plan summary, including a map showing the boundaries of the HFPBID' The petitions, the boundary map, and the Plan are on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Plan provides for the following improvements, maintenance, and services within the HFPBID, all of which are intended to provide and constitute special benefits to assessed properties: Advocacy & Program Coordination, Image Enhancement & Marketing, Enhanced Maintenance services, and related administration. The Plan proposes to fund these improvements, maintenance, and services through the levy of a benefit assessment on real property within the HFPBID.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes:

Section 1. The recitals set forth herein are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council finds that property owners who will pay more than fifty percent (50%) of the assessment proposed in the Plan have signed petitions. The City Council accepts the petitions and intends to renew the HFPBID and to levy an assessment on real property within the HFPBID boundaries in accordance with the Property and Business Improvement District Law of l994.lnthe first year of the ten (10) year term, the Resolution No. I 1016
Page I of4

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
total proposed assessment budget is $170,757.12. The assessment funds will be supplemented by non-assessment funds, so that the total budget for the initial year is estimated at $17 9,663.27 .

Section 3. The cost to the parcel owner is based on parcel size, benefitzone, and parcel use, as shown in the table below. Property tax-exempt parcels owned by non-profit entities and religious institutions will be assessed at fifty percent (50%) of the standard commercial assessment rate. Parcels with single-family residential uses shall not be assessed.

Assessment rates are subject to a cost-of-living increase of no more than three percent (3%) per year. The annual increase will be based on the Consumer Price Index.

Parcel Type
Annual Assessment Rate ($/sq ft)
Zone lA Zone lB Zone2 Zone 3 Zone 4
Commercial Uses $0.1 s $0.17 $0.17 $0.08s $0.07s
Non-Profit/Religious $0.07s $0.08s $0.08s $0.0425 $0.037s Section 4. The City Council finds that the Plan satisfies all requirements of Streets and Highway Code section 36622.

Section 5. The City Council declares its intention to renew the HFPBID and to levy and collect assessments on certain properties within the HFPBID boundaries pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994.

Section 6. The exterior boundaries and benefit zones of the HFPBID are shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 7. Bonds shall not be issued for the HFPBID
Section 8. The time and place for the public hearing on the renewal of the HFPBID and the levy of the proposed assessment are set for 6:30 PM on June 13, 2023, at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630. The City Council may continue the public hearing from time to time.

Section 9. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the time and place of the public hearing in accordance with Streets and Highways Code section 36623. The City Clerk is to do this by mailing (or causing to be mailed) written notices and assessment ballots in the time, form, and manner provided by Government Code section 53753 to all persons who own real property within the renewed HFPBID and will be subject to the proposed assessment, no later than April 22, 2023. The City Clerk is further directed to file an affidavit with the City Council when all notices and ballots have been mailed, setting forth the time and manner of his or her compliance with the requirements of law for mailing the notices and ballots.

Section 10. At the public hearing, the City Council will consider all objections or protests to HFPBID the proposed assessment, and any interested person will be permitted Resolution No. I1016
Page2 of 4

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
to present written or oral testimony. At the conclusion of the public hearing, all ballots submitted and not withdrawn will be tabulated in accordance with Government Code section 53753.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this llth day of April 2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I 1016

Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

EXHIBIT A _ MAP
H isto rlc Fo lso m P B lD
tory
I'o
Int
I,f-l r
ilo
t*..1
+'
t\s. {.t
t\'
%
o&*6
pf
aP
F,l5yel"*
ud*
*$s+* b+
**"
h*,u, Nalonn $1
""%do
"% .F*eu
+
Forf
<r
€ *l ", i
o
tgt
ind CIVITAS
Resolution No. 11016

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 2

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
2Ai24-2033

HISTORIC FOLSOM

PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN AND ENGINEER'S REPORT
Prepared panuant to the Prope@ and Business Improuement District Iu* of / 994, Streets and Highway Code rcction 36500 et seq.

Febnmqy 2212023

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Contents
V
T Impetus
IV. History and Accomplishments.....

Boundaries
J
5 6
7 VI. Service Plan & Budget.........
10 72
17 18
32 VIIL Govemance
IX. Engineer's Report.........

Appendix 1 -Maximum Annual Assessment Rates
Appendix 3 -Map JJ
Appendix 4 - ParcelAssessment Calculations 45
Appendix 5 -Total Estimated Maximum Cost of Improvements, Maintenance, andActivities ..'...,.....49 Appendix 6 - Baseline Services Ptovided..... """"""" 50 Prepared by Civitas
artaa
crvlTAspARTNEISt{lpS' pnOGRESS' pnOSpEPITV
www. civitasadvisors. com
(Boo)eee-7781
.,r=, tre]/

1.,ii,,,!l
FOLSOMHtsroRlc
Dlsr Rtc r AssoclAlloN
11Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

I. OVERVIEW
Developed by a growing coalition of propetty owners, the Historic Folsom Ptoperty and Business Improvement District (HFPBID) is a benefit assessment district whose main goal is to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities which constitute and convey a special benefit to assessed parcels. This approach has been used successfi-rlly in other cities throughout the country to provide special benefits to property owners, namely increased sales, attraction of new tenants, increased occupancies, and specifically increased propetty values. The HPBID was cteated in 2008 and was subsequendy renewed in 2014 for a ten (10) year tem. The HPBID has reached the end of this term, and property owners now vrish to renev/ the HPBID for another ten (10) year term. The renewed HFPBID will continue to provide seru'ices above and beyond those furnished by the City of Folsom, fot the direct benefit of assessed parcels. As required by state law, property owners have created this Management District Plan (Plan) to renew the HFPBID.

Location: The HFPBID is located in the histotic commercial atea of the City of Folsom. It is bound by the Folsom Lake State Recreation ^re^ on the north and west, the Sutter Street / Figueroa Street Alley on the south, and Scott Street on the east. A map is provided in Section V.

Purpose The purpose of the HF'PBID is to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities which constitute and convey a special benefit to assessed parcels. The HtrPBID will provide Advocacy & Program Coordination, Image Enhancement & Marketing, Enhanced Maintenance sefitices, and telated administration direcdy and only to assessed parcels within its boundaries.

Budget: The HFPBID annual assessment budget fot the initial year of its ten (10) year operation is anticipated to be $170,757.12. The annual budget may be subject to an increase in assessmentratesofnomotethanthreepercent(3%o)peryeaf. Theassessmentfundswill be supplemented by non-assessment funds (such as grants and eventincome), so that the total budget for the intdLal year is estimated at ff1,79,663.27. The amount of non- assessment funds is the minimum amount necessaq/ to pay for the general benefit provided by District programs. Further detail on the separation of special and geneml benefit is provided in Section IX.

Cost: The cost to the parcel owner is based on patcel size,benefrt zone, and parcel use as shown in the table below. Property tax-exempt parcels owned by non-profit entities and teligious institutions vdll be assessed at fifty percent (5070) of the standard commercial assessment rate. Parcels with single-family tesidential uses shall not be assessed. Assessment rates are subject to a cost-of-living increase of no more than three percent (3o/o) pet year. The annualincrease will be based on the Consumer Pdce Index.

Patcel Type
Annual Assessment Rate ($/sq ft)
ZoneT,Ft Zorl.elB Zone2 Zone3 Zone4
Commercial Uses $0.15 $0.17 $0.17 $o.o8s $0.075
Non-Profrt/Religious $0.075 $0.085 $o.o8s $0.0425 $0.0375 JHistoric Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Renewal: HFPBID renewal requires submittal of petitions from property ovmers tepresenung more than 50% of the total assessment. The "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" (also known as Propositio n21,8) requites a ballot vote in which more than 50% of the ballots teceived, weighted by assessment, be in support of the HFPBID.

Dumtion: The HFPBID will haveaten (10)-year-life, beginningJanuary 1.,2024 though December 37,2033. Neat the end of the term, the petition, ballog and City Council hearing process must be repeated fot the HtrPBID to be tenewed for another term of up to ten (10) years.

Management The Folsom Histotic DistrictAssociation (FHDA) will continue to serve as the Ownets' Association for the HFPBID, with oversight ftom the Folsom City Council. 4Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
il. IMPETUS
There are several reasoris why now is the time to renew the HFPBiD. The most compelling reasons are as follows.

1. The Need to be Proactive in Determining the Future of Historic Folsom.

In order to pfotect their investrnent, parcel ov/nefs must be partnefs in the ptocess that determines the level and frequency of services, and how new improvements and development ptojects are implemented. The HFPBID will allow these owners to lead and shape future services and improvements through the HFPBID.

2. The Need to Attract New Business and Investment Thtoughout Historic Folsom.

If Historic Folsom is to compete as a successful commercial district it must develop its own well- financed, proactive strategy to retain businesses and tenants as well ^s affract new business and investrneni. The HFPBID provides the financial resources to develop and implement a focused strategy that will work to prevent and fill vacancies and aLtact new tenants to all areas of Historic Folsom.

3. An Opportunity to Create a PtivatefPublic Patnerchip with a Unified Voice for Historic Folsom.

Because parcel owners would be investing frnancid, resources through the HFPBID, they will be looked ,rpor, ,, a strong p^ftnr.rin negotiations with the City. This partnetship -ill have the ability to levetage the parcel owner's investment with additional public investment in Historic Folsom.

4. An Opportunity to Establish Private Sectot Management and Accountability.

A non-profit, private organizatton formed fot the sole purpose of improving Histotic Folsom will ^un^gi the services provided and the HFPBID. Annual HFPBiD work plans and budgets are developed by a board composed of stakeholders that ov/n property in the Historic Folsom.

Improvements and activities provided by the HFPBID are subiect to private sector performance standards, conffols, and accountability'
5Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
ilI. BACKGROUND
The International Downtown Association estimates that mote than 1,500 Propetty and Business Improvement Districts (PBIDs) currendy operate throughout the United States and Canada. PBIDs are a time-tested tool for property ov/ners who wish to come together and obtain collective services which benefit their properties.

PBIDs provide supplemental services in addition to those ptovided by local govemment. They may also finance physical and capitat improvements. These improvements and activities are concentrated within a distinct geographic area and are funded by a special parcel assessment. Services and improvements are only provided to those who pay the assessment.

Although funds are collected by the local govemment, they are then directed to a private nonprofit. The nonprofit implements services and provides day-to-day oversight. The nonprofit is managed by a Board of Directors representing those who pay the assessment, to he$ erisute the serrices meet the needs of property ov/ners and arc tesponsive to changing conditions within the PBID.

PBIDs all over the globe have been proven to work by providing services that improve the overall viability of commercial districts, resulting in higher prcperty values, lease rates, occupancy rates, and sales volumes.

The HFPBID will be renewed pursuant to a state law that took effect rnJanuary of 1995. The "Propetty and Business Improvement Distlict Law of 1.994," which was signed into law by Govemot Pete Wilson, ushered in a new geneation of Property and Business Improvement Districts in California. I{ey provisions of the lavr include:
properties in each individual PBID;
of proposed assessments;
programs, with oversight ftom property ownerc and the Ciry are willing to pay; and
propefty ov/nefs.

The "Property and Business Improvement Business District Las, of 1994' is provided in Appendix 2 of this document.
6Historic Folsom PBID Management Disttict Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

IV. HISTORYANDACCOMPLISHMENTS
A. History
Folsom's Historic Disttict is the City's original central business disttict, with a vast amount of history and unique character that is beloved by the community. Folsom has experienced significant growth and the Folsom Historic District pfopefty ownefs embraced the need for the district to be clean, safe, ^fft^ct1ve,
and matketable. lfith the growth of new shopping centefs, Historic Folsom propefiy owners felt it vital to continue to attr^ctvisitors with enhanced beautification and professional management. The mission of the Folsom Historic District Association is to ptesewe, and independently shape the unique qualities that make it attractive, safer, cleaner, and more marketable.

In 7997 the City of Folsom designated a defined area known as the Suttet Street Histoflc Commercial Subarea in the Historic District Specific Plan, with a goal to maintain, restore, and reconstruct sites which represent the history of the Folsom area. These are the boundaries which encompass the PBID.

In 2006 the Folsom Historic Distict Association began the process of establishing a PBID' The goal was to provide for the maintenance, beautification, marketing, and management of a completed Streetscape Project funded by the Folsom Redevelopment Agency. The PBID was established fot its initial five (5) year term beginning in 2008 and was subsequendy tenewed in 201'4 fot ^ ten (10) year term.

B. Accomplishments
The Historic District of Folsom is a thdving, vibtant place to be proud of. It is without question that since its inception in 2008, the PBID has been pivotal in making a difference in the development of this special part of Folsom. Listed below are some key points in which this valuable program is working:

Advocagv and Program Cootdination
o Routine programs thatate encoutaged and ptomoted:
o Monthly Merchant Meetings/netwotking
I Fosters a sense of community and good neighbors
I Merchant Meetings have included meetings with Safety Officers, Ftee CPR Training, Community Leader discussions
r Important tevieurs of upcoming, recendy passed, ol current events o Marketing and Instagram classes, etc .
o Monthly marketing meeting with City, Chamber, Museums o Neighbor and Stakeholder quartedy meetings
o Regular updates between meetings to all businesses within the District o Regular updates to the community via Constant Contact, e-blasts, Website updates
o Professional Management
o 1 firll-time execudve directot
7Historic Folsom PBID Management Disttict Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
o 2 seasonal Part time emPloYees
o 60 on-call seasonal event staff
o Services also include accounting, legal, telephone, postage, and insurance costs.

Image Enhancement and Matketing
r Public Plaza Activation
o Year-round Saturday Farmers Market drawing in 800-1000 visitors weekly o 65+ days Seasonal Ice rink drawing in22,000 skaters and additional 45,000 observets
o AmphitheaterActivation
o Year-roundactivation
o Concerts
o Dance Performances
o Graduations
o Locai High School SPirit Parades
o Fashion Shows
o Award Ceremonies for local sporting events
o Marketing and Promotion of the Historic District
o Increased
s'l*;:1*,:t"t::t"T
through new events
o Sip and Stroll
o Spidts, Brews, and Bites
o Hometown Parade
o Art Hop
o Folsom Lake Symphony Performance
o Peter Irwis Memodal Blood Ddve
o Soap Box D.tby
o trestifall
o Spring and Fall Concert Series
o Twilight Concert Series (August)
o Holiday Light Promenade - 6 week Christrnas Light Stroll in the District, Santa Visits, Horse and Carriage rides
o Pedestr{an Promenade - Road closures, live music, pop up events r Partner Events - F'HDA Handles the scheduling, permits, communications and assists with marketing for these annual everits:
o Shakespeate (Iake Note TrouPe)
o Peach Festival (Living Smart)
o Ught up the Datk (Powerhouse Ministries)
o Eggcellent Adventure PassPort
o One-Off Events
o Heto Recognition @olsom Fire Departrnent)
o Rainbow Bridge 100 Year Centennial Event
o VW and Exotic Cat shows
8Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
a
a
o and too many more to list
Branding
o New Logos for FHDA - Regulat
o New Logo for FHDA - Holiday Season
o New District banners (Spdng and Winter)
Video Production
o Videos featuring Histotic District merchants dudng Covid o Videos featuring dancing merchants for Reopening Celebration o Sponsor thank you videos for major events
o Videos featuring highlights from the C'mas Ttee Lighting, Holiday Promenade, and Hometown Pande
Enhanced Maintenance
o Maintenance and beautification program that strives to keep the Histotic District neat and tidy, as well as make aesthetic improvements
o ""T"
#ilfrir;ffi1'""','a
on 3 brocks
' Shade Structure over amphitheater
I Cameras at Parking Garage,Amphitheater and Suttet St
: t'#^I.?:T;;il"-f
llT*jln'".'
o 15 ambassadors trained to provide support on weekends and during events
Lincoln Highway signage in disttict
c Denotes Folsom's part in the eady 1900 highway system Continsencv and Renewal
r Part of the PBID plan is a fiscal reserve to account for changes in anticipated revenue andf or expenses. This is a.vety small part of the overall budget (4'/")butvery prudent to plan for. o At the end of the PBID term, if thete are over ges in this portion of the budget, the funds can be used toward renewal of the PBID.
9Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

V. BOUNDARIES
A. HFPBID Boundaties
The HFPBID is located in the historic commercial area of the City of Folsom. It is bound by the Folsom Lake State Recreation ^re
orr the north and west, the Sutter Street / Figueroa Street Alley on the south, and Scott Street on the east.

The service area includes approximately 81 properties with 46 propetty owners. The HFPBID boundary is illustrated by the map below A larger map is ava:lable on request by calling Civitas ^t (91'6) 437-4300.

I,o
Itt
J,ffi,I,
Historic Folsom PBID
(
. .la
et
"$ato
@ %o*
hs
Rnu.Br*"
-'t
oo(qvs;o
t'o*
%o*
,.1t9
*"%-
do,
*"'"'i?l*.uzuo"
a sivirAs
trresa st
g*
.o"tt"
Historic Folsom PBID Management Disttict Plan 10

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

B. Benefit Zones
The Historic Folsom PBID will have fortZones of service. Zone 1. includes parcels within the HFPBID boundaries in the Historic Folsom Station, the Regional Ttansit Lrght Rail Station, and the Leidesdodf Plaza next to the Light Rail Station. Zone 2 includes all patcels within the HFPBID boundaries along Sutter Street that ate bounded by Folsom Boulevard to the west, Scott Street to the east, the Sutter Sfteet I trigaeroa Street Alley to the south, and (with the exception of Zone 1 parcels) by Leidesdotff Street on the north. Zone3 includes all parcels within the HFPBiD boundaries north of kidesdorff Street that are bounded by Folsom Boulevard to the west, the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area (FLSRA) to the north, and Riley Stteet to the east, Zone 4 includes all patcels within the HFPBID boundaries located in the Corporation Yard, west of Folsom Boulevard.

The HFPBID boundary is illustrated by the boundary map included in Appendix 3. Parcels in the map are identified by Map ID numbers cortesponding to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers, included in the Assessment Calculation Table which can be found in Appendix 4.

It is the intent of the Engineer's Report that each parcel included in the HFPBID can be cleady identified.

Every effort has been made to ensure that oJl, parcels included in the HFPBID are consistent in the boundary description, the boundary map (included as Appendi" 3), and the Assessment Calculation Table (included as Appendix 4). However, if inconsistencies arise, the order of precedence shall be: 1) the Assessment Calculation Table, 2) the District Boundary Map, and 3) this boundary description.

If the development, ov/nership, size, or zonng of a parcel changes during the term of this District, the assessment calculation may be modified accordingly.

Historic Folsom PBID Management Disuict Plan 11

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

VI. SERVICE PLAN & BUDGET
A. Renewal
Property and business owners in Historic Folsom had been concemed about the need for cootdinated supplemental services in the atea fot several years. City serr.ices and efforts in the area have been welcomed, but limited resources have not allowed for a more comptehensive apptoach to managing the commercial area. As a result of the need for services the HFPBID was formed in 2008, and subsequently renewed ln201,4, and property owners now wish to renew the HFPBID for another ten (10) year term.

A service plan to provide special benefits to assessed properties was developed using several methods. A series of propefty owner meetings, a survey of property ownets, and an analysis of current property conditjons and needs were conducted. The pimary needs identified were: Advocacy & Program Coordination, Image Enhancement & Matketing, and Enhanced Maintenance. To meet those needs, the renewed HF'PBID will continue to generate funds to provide these services, and related administration to assessed parcels within its boundaries.

B. Improvements, Maintenance and Activities
The HFPBID will provide supplemental improvements, maintenance and activities that are above and beyond those provided by the City and other govemment agencies. None of the services to be provided by the HFPBID are provided by the City or other govemment agencies. The improvements and activities will be provided directly and only to assessed parcels; they will not be provided to parcels that are not assessed. Each and every service is unique to the HF'PBID, thus the benefits provided arcpafttcttlar and distinct to each assessed parcel.

1. Advocacy and Program Coordination
To provide Historic Folsom propefiy owners udth an effective, clear voice in government decisions, the advocacy will include an administrator to speak for the owners within the HFPBID.

The administrator will ensure the delivery of quality services of the HFPBID and act as the unified voice to represent the interests of assessed parcels within the HFPBID. The HtrPBID will focus on ways to garner additional funding and services ftom public entities specifically for Historic Folsom improvements. These programs rvill work to specially benefit assessed patcels by increasing cotfinerce and making them more desirable for shoppers and potential tenants and will be a service provided direcdy to assessed parcels that is not provided to the public-at-large or parcels surrounding the District. The program coordination budget also includes genetal administtative costs, such as accoundng, legal, telephone, postage, and insurance costs.

2. Image Enhancement and Marketing
Image enhancement will include marketing and promotions to promote Historic Folsom as a destination with a rich set of unique oppotunities. In ordet to draw customers to Historic Folsom, the District needs to market itself as a single locality for a wide vane|y of atttacdons, events, and services. The HtrPBID will coordinate exciting and fun events for the historic area.

Further, the marketing program will gatner positive media coverage of Historic Folsom, and the good things happening in the area.Intemally, it will be important to facilitate consistent and frequent communications with parcel owners and tenants. The Historic Folsom PBID will work closely with the Folsom Chamber of Commerce, the Folsom Tourism Buteau, and othet stakeholders in the Historic District, as well as Folsom's City Government, to coordinate marketing efforts to make this ptogram as efficient and possible. These programs will work to Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 12

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
specially benefit assessed parcels by increasing commerce and making them mote desirable fot .hopp.t. and potential tenants, and will be a service provided direcdy to assessed parcels that is not provided to the public-at-latge or parcels surrounding the District.

3. EnhancedMaintenance
A maintenance and beautification program will keep Historic Folsom clean as well as wotk to make aesthetic improvements. A landscaping progmm will maintain trees and cut back any weeds along the sidewalks and in public ateas. In order to establish and maintain a uniform standard of cl.^nline., throughout the HFPBID, a maintenance patrol will provide additional debds and garbage collection beyond existing City services. The HFPBID v/ill condnue to wotk with the -ity t" enforce ordinances which encourage a cleanand aesthetically pleasing environment' These programs will work to specially benefit assessed parcels by increasing corrllnerce and making them more desirable fol shoppers and potential tenants.

4. Contingency and Renewal
The budget includes a prudent fiscal reserve. Changes in data and other issues may change the anticipated revenue and expenses. In order to buffer the otgarization for unexpected changes in reven;e, andf or allow the HF'PBID to fund other ovethead or renewal costs, the reserve is included as a budget item. At the expiration of the HFPBID, if there ate contingency funds remaining and owners vdsh to renew, the remaining funds could be used fot the costs of tenewal.

5. County and City Administration Fee
The City of Folsom shall retain a fee equal to three percent (3%.) of the amount of the assessment collected to cover the costs of collection and adminisftation for the City of Folsom and the County of Sacramento.

C. Annual Assessment Budget
A projected ten (10)-year budget for the HFPBID is provided below in sub-section E. The overall assessment budget shall remain consistent vdth this Plan. In the event of alegall challenge, assessment funds may be used to defend the HFPBID. The annual assessment budget is based on the followrng assumptions and guidelines:
1,. The cost of providing improvements, maintenance and activities m^y vary depending upon the market cost for those improvements, maintenance, and activities. Expenditutes may require adjustrnent up or down to continue the intended level of improvements, maintenance, and activities. The FHDA and their board shall have the authority to adjust budget allocations between the categories by no more than fifteen percent (157o) of the total budget per year' Any change will be approved by the FHDA and submitted with the Annual Report.

2. Funds not spent tn any $ven yeat may be rolled over to the next yeat.

3. The assessment rate will be subject to annual incteases that will not exceed three petcent (3'/") per ye t. The annual increase will be based on the Consumer Price Index fot All Items for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jos6 Area published by the United States Departrnent of Labor Buteau of Labor Statistics or, if no longer published, the City may select as a reference another index published by either the State of Califomia or a federal depattment or agency charged with the responsibility of measuring the cost of living in the local geogtaphical area. The City Council may delay or reject the annual increase in its discretion. The projections below in sub-section E illustrate the maximum annual three percent (3W increase fot all budget items.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 13

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

D. Service Budget
The total improvement, maintenance, and activity budget for 2024 that is funded by property assessments is $170,757. 1,2. In addition to the assessment revenue, the programs will be supplemented by non- assessment funds. The total of non-assessment funds, and the detetmination of special and genetal benefit, is included in the Engineer's Report. The total of assessment and non-assessment funds is provided in Appendix 5. Below is an illustration of the estimated total assessment budget allocations for each budget .it gory for the initial year of the of the District. Non-assessment funds may be shifted between budget categories as needed by the Boatd of the Ownets'Association.

County/City
Administration Fee,
ss,t23,3%
lnitial Annuat Assessment Budget i 5t7O,757 .L2
Contingency/ Renewal,
& Programs6,830 ,4% Coordination,
$s9,76s, 3s%
Enhanced
Maintenance,
540,982,24%
lmage Enhancement,
$s8,0s7,34%
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 1,4

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

E. Annual Ma:<imum Assessment Budget
The budget below assulnes ttre maximum annual increase of three percent (3o/) is enacted and that there are no changes to the categorical budget allocations.

Year
Advocacy &
Program
Coordination
Image
Enhancement
Enhanced
Maintenance
Contingency/
Reserve
County/
City
Fee
Total
2024 fi59,764.99 $58,057.42 $40,981.71 $6,830.29 $5,122.71 fi170,757.1,2 2025 $61,557.94 fi59,799.1,4 $42,211..16 $7,035.20 fi5,276.39 $175,879.83 2026 fi63,404.68 fi61.,593.1.2 $43,477.49 fi7,246.25 $5,434.68 fi181,,156.22 2027 $65,306.82 fi63,440.91 fi44,78t.82 fi7,463.64 fi5,591.72 $186,590.91 2028 fi67,266.03 $65,344.14 fi46,125.27 $7,687.55 $5,765.66 $192,188.65 2029 fi69,284.0"r $67,304.46 $47,509.03 $7,918.18 $5,938.62 fi1,97,954.30 2030 $71,362.53 fi69,323.59 $48,934.30 $8,155.72 $6,116.78 $203,892.92 2031 $73,503.40 fi71,403.30 fi50,402.33 $8,400.40 $6,300.29 fi210,009.72 2032 $75,708.50 fi73,545.40 $57,914.40 fig,652.4r $6,489.30 $216,310.0r 2033 fi77,97e.76 ff75,751,.76 fi53,471,.83 $8,911.98 $6,683.97 fi222,799.30 Total $685,138.66 fi665,563.24 $469,809.34 $78,301.62 fi58,726.1,2 $1,957,538.98 Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 15

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

VII. ASSESSMENT RATE
A. Assessment Formula
Individual assessed parcels shall be assessed an assessment rate accofding to each assessed parcel's proportionate special benefit derived from the services provided to each assessed parcel, as shown in the table below.

Parcel Type
Annual Assessment Rate ($/sq ft)
ZoneTA ZoneTB Zone2 ZoneS Zone4
Commercial Uses $0.15 $0.17 $0.17 $o.o8s $0.07s
Non-Profit/Religious $0.07s $o.o8s $0.085 $0.0425 $0.0375 B. Changes in Development, OwnerchiprZoning, or Parcel Size If the development, ownership, size, or zonrngof aparcelwithin the HFPBID boundary changes during the term of the HFPBID the assessment amount may be modified accotding to the assessment methodology detailed in this Plan that is applicable to the parcel. These changes may be a result of land adjustments (including but not limited to lot splits, consolidations, dght away setbacks, etc.), new construction, new ownership, ot changes in zoning.

C. Assessment Ballot and Public Notice
During the hearing process, an Assessment Notice will be sent to owners of each parcel in the HFPBID.

The Assessment Notice provides an estimated assessment. The final individual assessment fot any particular parcel may change, up or down, if the parcel squate footage, patcel type, benefit zofle, ot development status differ from those used to calculate the amount shown on the Assessment Notice. A Iist of parcels to be included in the HFPBiD is provided within Appendix 4.

D. Time and Manner fot Collecting Assessments
As provided by State Law, the HFPBID assessment uzill
^ppe r as a sep^rate line item on annual propefty
tax bills prepared by the County of Sacramento. Parcels which do not receive properly tax bills udll be invoiced by the City. Propefty tax bills are generally distributed in the fall, and payment is expected by lump sum or installment. The County of Sactamento shall distribute funds collected to the City of Folsom,which shall forward them to the HFPBID. Existinglaws for enforcement and appealofproperty taxes, including penalties and interest, apply to the HFPBID assessments.

E. Bonds
Bonds shall not be issued.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan I6

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

VIII. GOVERNANCE
A. Ovrners'Association
The HFPBID shall condnue to be govemed by the Folsom Historic District Assocation (FHDA), vrith oversight ftom the Folsom City Council. The FHDA shall serve as the Owners'Association described in the Streets and Highways Code 536651. The Board of Directors of FHDA and its staff arc chatged with the day-to-day operations of the HFPBID.

A majority of the Board of Directors of Folsom Historic District Assocation must be parcel ownerc patrng the assessment. The Board may also include representation fiom business owners, the City of Folsom, and the County of Sacramento. The Board of Ditectors must represent ^ v^iely of interests within the HFPBID and respond to the needs of ptoperty and business owners from various "commercial nerghbothoods" within the HFPBID.

B. BrownAct & Public Records Act Compliance
An Owners'Association is a private entity and may riot be considered a public entity for any pulpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials fot any pu{pose. The Owners' Association is, however, subject to govemment regulations telating to transparency, namely the Ralph M.

Brown Act and the Califomia Public Records Act. These regulations are designed to promote pubJic accountability. The Owners'Association must act as a legislative body under the Ratph M. Brown Act (Govemment Code 554950 et seq.). Thus, meetings of the FHDA Boatd of Directors and certain committees must be held in compliance with the public notice and other requitements of the Brown Act.

The Owners' Association is also subject to the tecord keeping and disclosure requirements of the Cahforrria Public Records Act.

C. Annual Report
The FHDA shall present an annual report at the end of each year of operation to the City Council pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 536650 (see Appendix 2). The annual report is a prospective report for the upcoming yeat and must include:
1,. Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the HF'PBID ot in any benefit zones or classification of property within the district;

2. The improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year;

3. The estimated cost of providing the improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year;

4. The method and basis of ler,ying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each real property owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his ot her property fot that fiscd,year;

5. The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal yeag and

6. The estimated amount of any cont'ibutions to be made from sources othet than assessments levied pursuant to this Plan.

Flistoric Folsom PBID Management District Plan 17

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

IX. ENGINEER'S REPORT
The HFPBID's parcel assessments will be imposed in accotdance with the provisions of Article XIIID of the CahfonttaConstitution. Article XIIID ptovides that "only special benefits are assessable,"l and requires the City to "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferted on a parceI."2 Special benefits are a"pardcular and distinct benefit over and above genetal benefits confeffed on teal property located in the district or to the public-at-1arge."3 Conversely, a genenl benefit is "conferred on real property located in the district or to the public-at-large."a Assessment law also mandates that "no assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the teasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferted on that parcel."s
The Engineer determined the total cost of the improvements and activities, quantified the general benefit accruing to the public-at-latge and non-assessed parcels adjacent to and within the HFPBID, and separated that amount from the special benefit accruing to the assessed parcels. Then, the Engineer determined the proportional special benefit derived by each parcel and allocated the special benefit value of the improvemerits and activities accotdingly. The Engineet's determinations and detailed calculations ate summadzedin this repoft.

A. Separation of General and Special Benefits
Each of the improvements and activities, and the associated costs and assessments within the HFPBID, were reviewed, identified, and allocated based on special and genetal benefits pursuant to Article XIIID of the Cahfonia Constitution. The assessment has been appottioned based on the proportional special benefits conferred to the assessed parcels located within the HFPBID boundaries as determined below.
l. General Benefits
Unlike special benefits, which are conferred ditecdy and only upon assessed parcels, a genenl benefit is conferred on the general public or lrori-assessed parcels. Existing City and othet public sentices, which are provided to every person and patcel, everywhere within the City, ^re^n ex mple of a general benefit. Although the HFPBID's boundar{es have been narrowly drawn and programs have been carefully designed to provide special benefits, and activities and improvements will only be provided direcdy to assessed parcels, it is acknowledged that there vdll be general benefits as a tesult of the District's activities and imptovements.

The Catfotnia Constitution mandates that "only special benefits ate assessable, and an agency shall separate the general benefits ftom the special benefits."6 "Genetally, this sepatation and quantification of general and special benefits must be accomplished by apportioning the cost of a service or improvement between the two and assessing properry owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits."7 The first step that must be undertaken to separate general and special benefits provided by the District's activities and improvements is to identify and quantify the general benefits. There are two bodies who can receive general benefits: the public-at-large within the HFPBID, and non-assessed parcels within and suffounding the HF'PBiD. 1 Cal. ConsL, arL XIll D, 54[a')
z Cal. Consl, arL XIII D, 54[a)
3 rd, s2fil
a Cal CorisL, artXlll D SZtil
s Cal. Const, arl XIII D, S4[a]
o Cal. Consl. artXlll D {4fel
z Golden Hiil NeighborTrobd Association v. City of San Diego (2071) 199 CalApp.4tt 416 Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 18

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
a. General Benefit to the Public-at-Large
Although the activities and improvements are narowly designed and carefully implemented to specially benefit the assessed parcels, and only provided direcdy to assessed parcels, they will generate a genetal benefit to the public -at-large within the HtrPBID. State law indicates that "Activities undertaken for the purpose of conferring special benefi.ts upon properry to be assessed inherendy produce incidental ot .ollat rrl effects that benefit property or pefsons not assessed."s Howevef, "the mere fact that special benefits produce incidenal or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed does not convert any portion of those special benefits or theit incidental ot collateml effects into genetal beneflts."e Further, "the value of any incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance or activities of a property-based district and that benefit propefty or persons not assessed shall not be deducted ftom the entirety of the cost of any special benefit or a{fect the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel."1o Thus, although fhete may be some incidental benefit to persons engaged in business on the assessed parcels, that incidental benefit is not considered general benefit because it is inherently produced by activities and improvements that provide special benefits to the assedsed parcels. There is, however, a generalbenefit to persons not engaged in business on the assessed patcels.

Intercept surveys conducted in similar districts have found that approximately 98.60/o of pedestdan traffic within the district boundaries is engaged in business on assessed patcels, while the remaining approximately 1,.4ohis simply passing through and not enggingin business on the assessed parcelslt. To ensure that the assessment dollars do not fund general benefits to the public-at-Iarge, that portion of the cost of services will be paid for with funds not obtained thtough assessments. Out of an abundance of caution, the 1.4o/o figure was rounded to 2o/o for the pu{poses of this Engineers Report. The 2o/o of taffrc passing through does not have any connecdon to the assessed parcels, and thetefore does not represent a special benefit to the assessed parcels. The 2o/o will, however, receive a derivative and indirect general benefit as a result of the activities and improvements being provided in the HFPBID. Therefore, it is estimate d that 2ok of the benefit created by the HFPBID's services is general benefit provided to the public-at-large. To ensure that the assessment dollars do not fund general benefits to the public-at-large, that portion of the cost of activities and improvements will be paid for with funds not obtained through assessments. Using the2oh figure, based on the initial year activity and imptovement budget, the value of this general benefit to the public -at-large is $3,593.27 (fi17 9,662.27 *0.02). b. General Benefit to Non-Assessed Parcels
Although they are only provided directly to the assessed parcels, the HFPBID's activities and improvements may also confer general benefits upon non-assessed parcels within and surrounding the HFPBID. One srudy examining ptoperty values in PBID ateas found "no evidence of spill-over impacts (either good or bad) on commercial ptoperties located just outside the BID's boundades;"l2 however, the California Court of Appeals has stated that "services specifically intended for assessed parcels concomitantly confer collateral general benefits to surrounding properties."l3 It is reasonable to conclude that activities and improvements within the HFPBID will have an incidental impact on non-assessed parcels surrounding ot within the HFPBID boundaries. Although the legislature has B Streets and Highways Code seaion 36601(h)(2)
e tbid
10 Streets and Highways Code Section 36622(kJ[2)
rr Surveys conducted in: North Park, San Diego (fanuary 2015); Downtown Burbank (October 201-7); Downtown Pomona (April 20181: and Sunrise MarketPlace, Citrus Heiehts [December 2019') . eu-imitrCenter for Real Estate & Urban Policy; ihe Impact of Bu6iness Improvement Districts on Properly Values: Evidence from New York Citv [20071 o.4
rs Beutz v. Riieiside fl010J 184 CalApp.4s 1516
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 19

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
indicated that "the value of any incidental or collateral effects that arise ftom the improvements, maintenance, or activities of a property-based district and that benefit property or persons not assessed shall not be deducted ftom the entirety of the cost of any special beneflt,"14 the California Court of Appeals has noted that "the charactetrzation of a beneht may depend on whether the patcel teceives a direct advantage from the improvement. ..of teceives an inditect, dedvative advantage resulting from the overall public benehts of the improvement."ls Those derivative and indirect impacts are considered general benefits and will be quantified and sepatated.

In this Engineer's opinion, because activities and improvements are provided only within the HFPBID and on its perimeter, parcels separated from the HFPBID by eithet at least one intervening parcel or an impassable physical barier such as awa)l,ralload track, freeway, or ditch will not receive spill ovet benefits. Parcels separated from the HFPBID will not benefit because they are physically removed from the actual location of activities and imptovements provided, and do not face serviced parcels.

Therefore, this analysis considers non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID's boundades and suffounding parcels that are immediately adjacent to and accessible ftom the HFPBID's boundaries.

The total HFPBID activity and improvement budget for the first yeat is $179,663.27. Aftet reducing the activity and improvement budget by the genetal benefit to the public-atJarge ($3,593.27), the remaining benefit to parcels is $176,070.00. This benefit has been distributed to both assessed and rron-assessed parcels using the following methodology. The general benefit to the public-atJarge has been proportionally allocated to the HFPBID's activity and improvement categories as shown in the following table.

Category Benefit to Parcels
Benefit to
Public-at-
Latge
Total
Advocacy & Program Cootdination $61.890.36 fi1,,263.07 fi63,153.43 Image Enhancement fi59.707.94 $1,218.53 fi60.926.47
Enhanced Maintenance fi42.1,46.79 $860.14 $43,006.93
Contingency/Renewal $7,042.81 fi143.13 $7,186.54
County/ City Administrauon Fee fis.282.10 $107.80 $5,389.90 TOTAL $176,070.00 $3,593.27 $179,663.27
To determine the general benefit to parcels, the Engineer assigned each parcel Soup a benefit factor, determined the appropriate parcel characteristic to use in the calculation, multipLied the benefit factor by the benefit characteristic to determine the benefit units attributable to each parcel group, and apportioned the remaining service cost (service cost minus general benefit to the public) in accordance with the benefit units derived by each parcel group.
i. Benefit Factors
All parcels within and adjacent to the HF'PBID have been assigned a benefit factot to mathematically represent the proportional special and general benefit and quantify the value of each. The determination of benefit factors for each type of activity follows. r+ Streets and Hishwavs Code section 36622[k)[2]
rs Tiburon v. Bonander (20091 180 CalApp.4k 1057,1077
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 20

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Tangible Actiuities
The tangible activities (those that ate physically provided via a person or people worfing throughout the district) to be provided by the HFPBID generate three types of special benefits:

Seraice - The pirnary special benefit provided by the HFPBID's physical activities is the actual service.

Presence - The HFPBID's physical activities also provide the special benefit of an individual's pfesence on the assessed parcel as the activities are provided, which can have a detettent effect and creates a positive impression that the area is well-maintained and safe. The "Disneyland effect" is the benefit the parcels receive from the observation that patcels ate being maintained. There are studies which link the perception of cleanliness to a perception of increased security.

Proxinifl - The HFPBID's physical activities also provide the special benefit of being in proximity to a cleaner, safer parcel. Neighboring parcels enjoy the spillover benefits of being adlacent to increased safety and cleanliness.

The majority of the benefit received by the patcels is the tesults of the district's services; onsite presence and proximity are lesset benefits. It is thrs Engineer's estimation that seventy-five percent (75"/") of the special benefit from the HtrPBID's physical activities is the service,while the presence and proximity benefits each account for twelve and one-half petcent (12.5% presence, 1.2.5o/o proximiry) of the special benefit. Assessed parcels will teceive all three benefits; flon-assessed parcels within and adjacent to the HF'PBID will not be direcdy serviced and therefore only teceive the general benefit of ptoximity.

Intangibk Actiuiti€s
Some of the HFPBID's activities, such as marketing, are distinct in that they are not provided to a targeted area within the HtrPBID, rather they ate provided via Internet, radio, and other forms of media and targeted at an audience outside the HFPBID in an effot to bring the audience into the HFPBID. These activities provide two types of special benefits:

Direct Exposure - The pimary special benefit provided by the HFPBID's intangible activities is exposure. The intangible activities increase awarerless of the HFPBID as a commercial and business destination and lead to increased patronage.

Irucidental Exposure - The HFPBID's intangible activities will also have a secondary special benefit of incidental exposure, such as word-of-mouth exposure, that results from the direct exposure and increases awareness of the HFPBID as a commercial and business destination.

The majority of the benefit from these activities is the direct exposure; the incidental exposure is a lesset benefit. It is this Engineer's estimation that ninety petcent (90ok) of the special benefit from the intangible activities is direct exposure, while ten percent (107r) is incidental exposure. Assessed parcels will receive both as special benefits; non-assessed patcels within and adjacent to the HFPBID will not be directly marketed and therefore only receive the general benefit of incidental exposure.

Factors Deterrnined
Based on the foregoing analysis, all assessed parcels within the HtrPBID specially beneFtt ftom the HFPBID's activities and improvements, and have been assigned a benefit factor of 1.0. Parcels that Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 21

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
are not assessed have been assigned benefit factots based on the portion of the beneht they will receive, as described above. The non-assessed parcels will benefit from 12.5%o of the tangible activities and1,0o/o of the intangible activities; therefore they have been assigned benefit factors of 0.725 and

0.10, respectively.
ii. Non-Assessed Benefit Characteristics
There are two types of parcels that are not assessed; those within the HFPBID and those immediately adjacent to and accessible from the HFPBID. Because they generally benefit in a differing manner, distinct parcel characterisdcs are used to quantift the general benefit to each type.

Inside-Non-assessed parcels inside of the HFPBID are suffounded by patcels thatateassessed and receiving the full special benefits; they will, thetefore, receive the general benefits of proximity and indirect exposure. These parcels are impacted on mote than one side by the HFPBID's activities, marketing has a direct impact all around them, and activities are ptovided all around them. Because these parcels are surrounded by specially benefitted parcels, it is appropriate that parcel square footage be used to measure the general benefit they teceive.

Afiacent - Adjacent parcels are those lhat are immediately adjacent to or directly across the street from specially benefitted parcels, and accessible from specially benefitted parcels. These parcels generally benefit differendy than those inside the district, because these parcels are adjacent to, rather than surrounded by, specially benefitted patcels. Square footage is not an appropriate measure of benefit to these parcels. Because the patcels are not surrounded by serviced parcels, a long, shallow parcel with the satne square footage as a deep, narrow patcel will receive a different level of general benefit. Likewise, two parcels with the same depth but a different .r'idth adjacent to sewiced parcels will benefit differently. To account fot this difference, it is appropriate that parcel linear frontage be used to measure the general benefit the adjacent parcels receive.
iii. Calculations
To quantify and separate the general benefit to non-assessed parcels, the following calculations were undertaken for each budget category.

1.. The total service budget for each category was determined and the amount of general benefit to the public-at-large was subttacted from the category budget.

2. The benefit factor applicable to each activity or imptovement was multiplied by the parcel square footage or linear frontage of assessed and non-assessed parcels, to determine the number of beneht units received by each parcel group.

3. The benefit units for allparcel groups were sufrrned, and the percentage of benefit units attributable to each parcel group was calculated.

4. The total remaining activity and improvement budget, less the amount aheady determined to be general benefit to the public-atJarge, was allocated to general and special benefit categories for each patcel group using the calculated benefit percent and applicable benefit chatacteristic methodology'

5. The special and general benefit resulting from the administrative and contingency portions of the budget were determined based on the propottional allocation of benefits derived from activities and improvements'
Historic Folsom PBID Management Disuict Plan 22

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Aduocacy dz Program Coordination
The advocacy & program coordination budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public-at- large, is $61,890.36. The calculations below detetmine the amount of general benefit to non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID. The advocacy & program coordination budget category contains tangible activities; the Engineer used the 0.125 benefit factor to quantify the general benefit.

The advocacy & program coordination budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public and non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID, is $60,009.03. The calculadons below determine the amount of genetal benefit to parcels adjacent to the HFPBID.

Therefore, the allocation of the advocacy & program coordination budget is as follows General Benefit - Public-At-Latge ffl,263.07
General Benefit - Inside Parcels $1,881.33
General Benefit - Adjacent Patcels fi244.04
Special Benefit ff59,164.99
Total $63,153.43
Image Enhancement
The image enhancement budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public-at-large, is ff59,707.94. The calculations below determine the amount of general benefit to non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID. The image enhancement budget category contains intangible activities; the Engineer used the 0.10 benefit factor to quantiS' the general benefit.

Parcel
Twe
Squate
Footaqe
Benefit
Factor Benefit Units Benefit
Percent
Remaining
Budqet
Assessed 1,.483.391, x 1.000 = 1,483,391.00 96.960% x $61.890.36 = $60,009.03 Non-
Assessed 372.044 x 0.125 46,505.50 3.040% x $61.890.36 = $1,881.33 Parcel
Twe
Linear
Ftontage
Benefit
Factor Benefit Units Benefit
Percent
Rematning
Budqet
Inside 20.786 x 1.000 = 20,786.00 99.593o/o $60.009.03 = 959764.99 Adiacent 679 x 0.125 = 84.88 0.4070/0 $60,009.03 ff244.04 Patcel
Tvpe
Square
Footage
Benefit
Factot Beneht Units
Benefit
Percent
Remaining
Budeet
Assessed 1,.483,39r x 1.000 = 1,483,391.00 97.553o/o x $59,707.94 = 958,247.07 Non-
Assessed 372,044 x 0.100 = 37,204.40 2.447% x $59,707.94 = 91,460.87 Flistoric Folsom PBID Management Disttict Plan 23

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

The image enhancement budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public and non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID, is $58,247.07. The calculations below determine the amount of genetal benefit to patcels adjacent to the HFPBID.

Therefore, the allocation of the image enhancement budget is as follows General Benefit - Public-At-Large $1,218.53
General Benefi.t - Inside Parcels $1,460.87
General Benefit - Adjacent Parcels $189.65
Special Benefit $58,057.42
Total $60,926.47
E nhanced Maintenance
The enhanced maintenance budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public-at-large, is fi42,1,46.79. The calculations below determine the amount of genetal benefit to non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID. The enhanced maintenance budget c tegory contains intangible activities; the Engineet used the 0.10 benefit factor to quantify the general benefit.

The enhanced maintenance budget, minus the amount of general benefit to the public and non- assessed parcels within the HFPBID, is $41,115.58. The calculations below determine the amount of general benefit to parcels adjacent to the HFPBID.

Parcel
Tvp.

Ltneat
Frontage
Benefit
Factot Benefit Units
Benefit
Percent
Remarrring
Budset
Inside 20,786 x 1.000 = 20,786.00 99.674% x $58,247.07 = $58.057.42 Adiacent 679 x 0.100 = 67.90 0.326% xfi58.247.07 = $189.65 Parcel
Tyre
Square
Footage
Benefit
Factot Benefit Units
Benefit
Percent
Remarning
Budget
Assessed 1,,483,391 x 1.000 = 1,483,391.00 97.553% x$42,146.79 = $41,115.58 Non-
Assessed 372,044 x 0.100 = 37,204.40 2.447% xfi42,146.79 = $1,031.21 Parcel
Twe
Lineat
Frontaqe
Benefit
Factor Benefit Units
Benefit
Percent
Remaining
Budqet
Inside 20,786 x 1.000 = 20,786.00 99.6740h $41,115.58 = $40.981.71 Adjacent 679 x 0.100 = 67.90 0.326% $41,115.58 = $133.87 Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 24

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Therefore, the allocation of the enhanced maintenance budget is as follows:

General Benefit - Public-At-Large $860.14
General Benefit - Inside Parcels fi1,,031,.21
Genetal Benefit - Adjacent Patcels $133.87
Special Benefit $40,981.71
Total $43.006.93
ContingenE/Renewal
The contingency/renewal budget lines items telate to the activities and improvements provided.

These costs have been allocated proportionally based on the special and general benefit provided by each category.

County/ CiE Adninistration Fee
The County/City administration fee budget lines items relate to the activities and imptovements provided. These costs have been allocated proportionally based on the special and general benefit ptovided by each category.
iv. Total Benefits
Based on the foregoing calculations, the total benefits to assessed parcels, non-assessed parcels, and the general public are:

Special Benefit to
Parcels
General Benefit
to Patcels
Advocacv & Ptosram Coordination fi59,764.99 fi2,125.37
Image Enhancemerit $58.0s7.42 $1.650.52
Enhanced Maintenance $40,981.71 $1.165.08
Activity Totals $158.804.12 fi4.940.97
Percent 96.98250h 3.01,75%o
Contingencv/Renewal $6,830.29 ff21,2.51
Counry/ City Administrauon Fee fi5.122.71 $159.39
Total Parcel Benefits ff170.7s7.12 $5,312.87
Special Parcel General Public Total
Advocacy & Program
Coordination $59.764.99 ff2,125.37 fi1.,263.07 fi63,153.43 Image Enhancement $58.057.42 $1,650.52 $1.218.53 fi60.926.47 Enhanced Maintenance $40,981.71 $1.165.08 $860.14 $43.006.93 Continsencv/Renewal $6,830.29 fi21,2.52 ff1,43.73 $7,186.54 County/ City Administration
Fee $5.122.71 $159.39 $107.80 $5,389.90
Total $110.757.12 $5,312.88 $3,593.27 $179,663.27
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 25

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
c. Non-Assessment Funding
The programs funded by the HFPBID receive additional non-assessment funding in the form of grants, corporate sponsorships, event income, city general fund contributions, and other miscellaneous funds. These funding sources are antjcipated to equal or exceed the amount of general benefit confetred annually by the HFPBID's activities and improvements, $8,906.15. These non- assessment funds will be used to pay for the general benefit provided by the HFPBID's activities and improvements, ensudng that parcel assessments will only be used to provide special benefits and"any additional costs of providing general benefits [ate] not included in the amounts assessed."16

2. Special Benefit
The activities and improvements to be provided by the HFPBID constitute and convey special benefits directly to the assessed parcels. Assessment law tequires that "the ptopottionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be detetmined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the properry related service being ptovided."li Futther, "no assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the teasonable cost of the propottional special benefit conferted on that parcel."18 Special benefit "includes incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of ptoperty-based districts even if those incidental ot collateral effects benefit property or persons ftot assessed."le To determine the total special benefit value to be conveyed to the assessed parcels, we deduct the general benefit value ($8,906.15) fiom the total value of the activities and imptovements (fi179,663.27).

The remaining $170,757.1,2 is considered the special benefit to assessed parcels (the "Total Assessment"). The Total Assessment represents the total value of the special benefit to be ptor,'rded by the activities and improvements. The Total Assessment has been proportionally dMded among the assessed parcels so that no assessment exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on a parcel. The assessment fate has been desrgned to ensute that "ptopetties that receive the same proportionate special benefit Pa)t the same assessment."20 Service Ptovided
Total Benefit
Value
General
Benefit
Value to
Public
Benefit Value
to Patcels
(Special &
Genetal)
Special Benefit
to Assessed
Parcels
Advocacy & Ptogram
Cootdination $63,r53.43 fi1.263.07 $61,890.36 ffs9,764.99 Imaqe Enhancement fi60,926.47 $1,218.53 $59,707.94 $58,057.42 Enhanced Maintenance $43.006.93 $860.14 $42.1.46.78 $40,981.71 Continqency/Renewal $7.186.54 fi143.73 fi7,042.81, $6,830.2e County/ City Admimstratron Fee $5.389.90 $107.80 fi5,282.10 ffs,122.7r TOTAL $179,663.21 $3,593.27 $176,069.99 $770,757.12
16 Streets and Highways Code section 36632(a)
17 Cal. Const, artXlll D $4[al18 lbid
1q Sfteets and Hiehwavs Code section 36615.5
20 Tiburonv. Bonhndei 1zoos}1B0 CalApp.4tr 1057
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 26

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

B. Assessment Methodology

1. Base Formula
Each parcel will be assessed based on proportional special benefits received. The variables used for the annual assessment formula arc parceltype, parcel size, benefit zone, and level of development. These vadables arc all appropriate measures of the proportional special benefit because the need fot services, level of services, and quantity of services are all telative to these variables; thus the special benefit provided to each parcel by the services can be proportionally measuted using these variables.

Determination of Assessment Rates
"Because not all patceis in the distnct ate identical in size...some will receive mote special benefit than others."21 Each of the variables used relates direcdy to the service level and special benefit provided to each parcel. Parcel square footage is the size of the parcel, measured in square feet. Size is an appropriate measure of proportional special benefit because it relates direcdy to the quantity of services provided to the parcel, the highest and best use of a parcel, and reflects the long-term value implications of the HF'PBID. The latget aparcel, the mote services and benefit the parcel will teceive.

Because not all parcels in the HFPBID are identical in use, some will receive more special benefit than others. Fot example, a. non-profit owned patcel will benefit to a lesser degree than a commercial parcel, because it will not enjoy the benefits of incteased commerce resulting from the services.

Futher detail on the benefit to each parcel type is in the following pages. To determine the assessment rates, the assessed parcels were classified by the estimated benefit each type of parcel receives, the estjmated special benefit value of the activities and improvements provided to each type was determined based on approximate cost of service provision, and an assessmeflt rate that is proportional to the estimated proporti.onal benefit received by each patcel type was determined.

To determine the assessment rates, the estimated special benefit value for each parcel type was divided by the total assessable parcel square footage, patcel type, and benefit zor'e as shown in the tables below.

ParulT1pe
Parcel types were categoirzed based on the typical amount of foot and vehicle traffic on the various commercial and apartment complex patcels. Parcels with hear,y traffic, such as commercial parcels, will receive the highest level of services. Patcels with lower trafftc, such as apattment complex parcels will receive the lowest level of services. The approximate cost of services by patcel type was determined. Then, the cost of setvices by Tp. was divided by the parcel square footage of those parcels to determine the assessment rates.

Parcel Siry
The HFPBID's sen'ices will benefit each assessed parcel as a whole. The service budget which, in this Engineer's estimation, represents special beneltts to the parcels, has been allocated based on patcel size.
zt Dahms v. Downtnwn Pomona (2009) 17 4 CalApp.4t' 708
Flistoric Folsom PBID Management District Plan 27

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Parcel Type
Initial
Patcel Size
Budget
Patcel Squate
Footage
Initial Parcel
Assessment
Rate
($/sqft/yr)
Zone 1.A Commercial
Zone 1B Commetcial
Zone2 Commercial
Zone3 Commercial
Zone 4 Commercial
fi52,002.45 +
$1,351.84 +
$53,798.80 +
$24,138.81 +
ff39.465.23 +
346,683 =
7,952 =
338,777 =
283,986 =
526,203 =
$0.1s
$0.17
$0.1 7
$0.08s
$0.07s
Property tax-exempt parcels owned by non-profit entities 2nd lsligious institutions will be assessed at ltftJ percent (507.) of the standard commercial assessment rate.

Summary of Assessment Rates
Therefore, for the intnalyear, the maximum annual assessment fates to parcels are as shown below and in Appendix 1. Maximum ann:ual assessment rates may be subject to an inctease of no mote than three (3ok) percent per year as shown in Appendix 1.

Parcel Type
Annual Assessment Rate ($/sq ft)
ZonelA ZonetB Zone2 Zolae3 Zone 4
Commercial Uses $0.1 5 $0.17 $0.17 $o.o8s $0.07s
Non-Profit/Relis,ious $0.075 $o.o8s $0.085 $0.0425 $0.037s Sample assessment calculations are shown in Appendix 4

2. Zonel
Parcels inZone 1 receive and benefit ftom all HFPBID sen'ices' Zone l parcels include the Historic Folsom Station, Light Rail Station, Leidesdorff Plaza, amphltheater, parking gat^ge, and a small number of tetail-oriented or undeveloped patcels. These patcels receive a significant level of pedestrian traffic mainly due to their function and proximiLy to Zone2. i. ZoneTA
Parcels inZone 1 which are not fully developed and have not been issued a Certificate of Occupancy are designated Zone 1A. Because these parcels are not developed, they have a low ratio of building square footage to lot square footage and receive approximately 80Yo of pedestrian traffic comparcd to Zone 2.

For these reasons, the assessment rate for Zone 1A parcels is equal to approximately B0o/o of the assessment rateinZone2. \7hen the annual review of assessments is conducted, if development has been completed on a parcel in Zone 1A and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued fot the parcel, then theZone 1A parcel will be considered asZone 18 for all future assessments. ii. ZonelB
Parcels tn Zone 1 which are fully developed and have been issued a Cettificate of Occupancy ^re designated Zone 1B. Because these parcels are fully developed and occupied, they have a high mtio of building squarcfootageto lot square footage and receive apptoximately dre samelevel of pedesttianttaffrc compared toZone2. For these reasons, the assessment rate forZone 18 parcels is equal to the assessment rate in Zone 2.

Historic Folsom PBiD Management District Plan 28

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

3. ZoneL
Parcels tnZone 2 rcceive and benefit from all HF'PBID sen'ices.

These parcels are mostly commercial-odented and sit along the Sutter Street corridor which serves as the main location for events and other activities. Zone 2 parcels ate diffetent in character than the parcels in the other zones; the build out of the zone was based on historic standatds and is more intense than other zones. The tatio of building squate fooage to parcel size is significandy higher than in other zones.

As a result of the high ratio of building square footage and economic activity of the zone, Zone2 parcels have the highest levels of day and night pedestrian trafftc. For these reasons, the assessment rate forZone 2 is the highest.

4. Zone3
Parcels inZone 3 receive and benefit from all HFPBID services.

Parcels in Zone 3 have approximately half of the ratio of building square footage to lot square footage compared to Zones 1 and 2 and receive a lower pedestrian tradfic level comparcd to Zone 2, thetefore the assessmentrate for parcels inZone 3 is equal to half of the rate in Zone2.

5. Zone 4
Parcels inZone 4 receive limited HFPBID benefits compared to Zones 2, 1, and 3.

These parcels are pnmartly non-colrunercial, consisting mosdy of office and govemment buildings. The parcels in Zone 4 receive the lowest level of pedestrian traffic compared to Zones 2, 1,, and 3 patcels (approximately half of the pedestdan traffic level compared toZone 1), and a lour ratio of building square footage to lot square footage. For these teasons, Zone 4 is assessed at the lowest assessment rate.

6. Commercial Parcels
Commercial parcels will receive and benefit ftom all HtrPBID sentices (Advocacy & Program Coordination, Image Enhancement, and Enhanced Maintenance), services, which are aimed to attract and increase customers and visitors to assessed parcels. Commercial patcels include retail-use, office-use, industrial, school, park, mixed-use, tesidential hotel, motel, and resort parcels, road parcels , afld v^cant parcels & parking lots zoned or used for any the of the aforementioned uses. These parcels have a commercial component because their owners aim to benefit ftom tenant rents, now or in the future, increased customers, or increased use by visitors. The primary putpose of the HF'PBID is to provide property owner services which generate special benefits to parcels with commercial uses, and will therefote be assessed the firll rate.

Yacantparcels assessed at the commerciaJ. nteinclude patcels either zoned or used for the uses specified in the previous paragraph. These vacant parcels will teceive and benefit ftom all HFPBID services. These parcels are pfone to experlence nuisance issues because they are open spaces and are not frequently visited by property owners. The ease of access and infrequent visitation by ptoperty owners contributes to nuisance issues and have a high remediation cost for the owner. HFPBID Image Enhancement, and Enhanced Maintenance seryices will reduce nuisance behaviors and the occuffence of detrimental activities such as graffiti, littering, loitering, and criminal activity, which negatively impact the parcels. The Advocacy & Program Coordination provided by the HF'PBID will assist property owners with vacant patcels when they attempt to develop or sell the parcel by promoting the HFPBID as a desirable, clean and safe ateafor doingbusiness.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 29

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

7. Ptoperty Tax-Exempt Non-Profit and Religious Parcels As stated above, the primary purpose of the HFPBID is to benefit parcels with commetcial uses. Property tax-exempt parcels ovrned by non-profit endties and religrous institutions despite theit non-commetcial nature, will nonetheless benefit from the cleaner, safer envitonment the HFPBID will create. Therefore, property tax-exempt parcels owned by non-profit entities and religious institutions within the boundaries of the HFPBID will pay an assessment rate that is fifty percent (507o) of the standard commetcial assessment rate, which is commensurate to the benefit they receive. Vacant lots that are located on the premises of a property tax-exempt parcel will be assessed at the non-profit rate.

8. Government- Owned Parcels
Under "The Right to Vote on Taxes Act" (also known as Proposition2l,S) all public parcels are required to pay assessments unless they can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that their parcels do not receive benefit. Parcels owned by the City of F'olsom and other public entities will receive and benefit from all of the HFPBID's services, therefore they u'ilI pay the commercial rate which is commensurate with their "fafr share" of all assessments.

9. Non-Assessed Parcels
There are thirty-four (34) parcels within the HFPBID that will not be assessed. These parcels are neithet commercial nor non-profit/religious parcels and will not specially benefit from or direcdy receive the HFPBID's activities and improvements. These parcels are accounted fot in the analysis of general benefit provided to non-assessed parcels within the HFPBID. These parcels have the following uses:

Rrsidential Parcels: Califomia Streets and Highways Code Section 36632(c) states, "Propetties zoned soleiy for residential use, or that are zoned for agricultutal use, are conclusively presumed not to benefit fiom the improvements and seryices funded through these assessments and shall not be subject to ^nyassessment pursuant to this part." The pimary putpose of the HFPBID is to benefit parcels with commercial and non-profit uses; services have not been designed to benefit and will not be provided to single family residential parcels. Therefore, parcels within the boundaries of the HFPBID to the extent that they are zoned for single-family, multi-family, ot vacant lots zoned as having residential uses shall not be assessed.

10. Changes in Data
It is the intent of this Plan and Engineet's Report that each parcel included in the HFPBID can be cleady identified. Every effot has been made to ensure that all patcels included in the HFPBID are consistent in the bound^ry m^p and the assessment calculation table. However, if inconsistencies arise, the otder of precedence shall be: 1) the assessment calculation table and2) the boundary map.

If the parcel size or type of a parcel changes during the term of this HFPBID, the assessment calculation may be modified accordingly.

Categoiqation Appeals
The category determined for each parcel is shown in Appendix 4. The use for each patcel is established at formation and may be updated upon each tenewal. If a parcel owner believes their parcel has been mis-classified or has changed, they may appeal in writing to the City of Folsom fot re-consideration.

Appeals must be received by the City no later thanJune 1 of each yeat. Appeals must include the parcel number, cuffent classification, requested classification, and the evidence upon which the appeal is based.

Appeais will not provide retroacdve reductions.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 30

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Appeals should be made to:

Finance Director
City of F'olsom
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
916-461,-6080
C. Engineeds Cetification
I hereby certifr, to the best of my knowledge and experience, that each of the identified assessed parcels located within the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District will teceive a special benefit over and above the general benefits conferred and that the amount of the assessment is no greater than the proportional special benefits conferred on each parcel, as described in this Engineet's Report.

Review of this Histot'ic Folsom Properry and Business Improvement Disttict Management District Plan andpreparation of the Eng'ineer's Report was completed by:

Ross Peabody
State of Califomia
February 27,2023
Date
Thi"s Engineerl Repon is inteafud to be dittibuted at part of the Managenent Distit Plan in its entirefl, including the Asrcrnent Calmlation Tabk (Appendix 4) and the Boundagt ME. Repnductlon and distibution of on! Seaion IX of this Managenent Disfia Plan uioktes the intent of tbh starzp and ignaturc.

CI V\
[*p 9J023
c51
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 31

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX 1- MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATES
The table below illustrate the maximum annual assessment rates with the assumption that the rates will be increased annually by three percent (3"/"). The maximum rates listed are a required disclosute and not the anticipated course of action.

Yeat Commercial
ZonelA
Commercial
ZonelB
Commercial
Zone2
Commercial
Zone3
Commercial
Zone 4
2024 $0.1500 $0.1700 $0.1700 $0.0850 $0.0750
2025 $0.1545 $0.1751 $0.1751 $0.0876 $0.0773
2026 $0.1591 $0.1804 $0.1804 $0.0902 $0.0796
2027 $0.1639 $0.1858 $0.1 858 $0.0929 $0.0820
2028 $0.1688 $0.1913 $0.1913 $0.0957 $0.0844
2029 $0.173e $0.1971 $0.1971 $0.0985 $0.0869
2030 $0.1791 $0.2030 $0.2030 $0.1015 $0.0896
2037 $0.1845 $0.2091 $0.2091 $0.1045 fi}.0e22
2032 $0.1900 $0.21s4 $0.21s4 $0.1077 $0.0950
2033 $0.1957 fi}.221,8 $0.2218 $0.1109 $0.0979
Fiscal
Yeat
Non-Profit/
Religious
ZoneTA
Non-
Profit/Religious
ZonelB
Non-Profit/
Religious
Zone2
Non-
Profrt/
Religious
Zone3
Non-
Ptofrt/
Religious
Zone 4
2024 $o.075o $0.0850 $0.0850 $0.0425 $0.0375
2025 $0.0773 $0.0876 $0.0876 $0.0438 $0.0386
2026 $o.07e6 $0.0902 $0.0902 $0.04s1 $0.0398
2027 $0.0820 $0.0929 $0.0929 $0.0464 $0.0410
2028 $0.08,+4 $0.0957 $0.0957 $0.0478 fi}.0422
2029 $0.086e $0.0e85 $0.0e85 $0.0493 $0.0435
2030 $0.0896 $0.1015 $0.1015 $0.0s07 $0.0448
2031 $0.0e22 $0.1045 $0.1045 $0.0523 $0.0461
2032 $0.09s0 $0.1077 $0.i077 $0.0s38 $0.047s
2033 $0.0979 $0.1109 $0.1109 $0.05s5 $0.0489
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 32

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX2- PBID I-AW
*** THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH THE 2023 SUPPLEMENT *** (ALL2022 LEGISLATION)

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
DIVISION 18. PARKTNG
PART 7. PROPERTYAND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTR]CT I-AW OF 1994 CHAPTER 1. General Provisions
ARTICLE 1. Declarations
36600. Citation of oart
This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Property and Business Improvement District Law of 7994." 36601. Legislative frndings and declarations; Legislative guidance The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) Businesses located and operating within business districts in some of this state's communities are economically disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract customers due to inadequate facilities, serices, and activities in the business disuicts.
@) It is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of business districts in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and ptevent the erosion of the business districts. , G) It is of particular local benefit to allow business districts to fund business related imptovements, maintenance, and activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or real property that teceive benefits ftom those improvements.
(d) Assessments levied for the purpose ofconferdng special benefit upon the real property or a specific benefit upon the businesses in a business district are not taxes fot the general benefit of a city, even if property, businesses, or persons not assessed receive incidental or collateral effects that benefit them. (e) Property and business improvement districts fotmed throughout this state have conferred special benefits upon properties and businesses within their districts and have made those properties and businesses more useful by providing the following benefits:
(1) Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has confumed a L2-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes within the 30 districts studied.
(2) Job creation.
(3) Business altractjon.
(4) Business retention.
(5) Economic growth.
(6) New investrnents.
($ \7ith the dissolution of tedevelopment agencies throughout the state, ptoperty and business improvement distdcts have become even more important tools with which communities can combat blighg promote economic opportunities, and ueate a clean and safe environment.
(g) Since the enactment of this act, the people of Califomia have adopted Proposition 218, which added Article XIII D to the Constitution in order to place certain requirements and restrictions on the formation of, and activities, expenditures, and assessments by properq.based districts. Article XIII D of the Constitution provides that property- based districts may only levy assessments for special benefits. (h) The act amending this section is intended to provide the Legislatwe's guidance with regard to this act, its interaction with the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution, and the determination of special benefits in property-based districts.
(1) The lack of legislative gurdance has resr.rlted in uncetainty and inconsistent application of this acq which discourages t1le use of assessments to fund needed improvements, maintenance, and activities in property- based districts, contributing to blight and other undetutiLization of property. (2) Activities undertaken for the purpose of conferring special benefits upon property to be assessed inherendl' produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed. Therefore, Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan -)-)

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
for special benefits to exist as a separate and distinct categoly ftom general benefits, the incidental or collateral effects of those special benefits are inherendy part of those special benefits. The mere fact that special benefits produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit ptoperty or persons not assessed does not conveit afly portion ofthose special benefits or their incidental or coilateral effects into general benefits. (3) It is of the uffnost importance that property-based districts created under this act have clarity regarding restdctions ofl assessments they may lery and the proper determination of special benefits. Legislative clarity with regard to this act will provide districts with clear instructions and courts with legislative intent regrding restdctions on property-based assessments, and the mannet in which special benefits should be detetmined. 36602. Pumose of oart
The purpose of this part is to supplement previously enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to ler,y assessments within property and business improvement districts, to ensure that those assessments conform to all constitutional tequirements and are determined and assessed in accordance with the guidance set forth in this act. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the fi.rnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these pu4)oses.
36603. Preemption of authority or charter city to adopt ordinances Lrying assessments Nothing in this part is intended to preempt the authority of a chater city to adopt ordinances providing for a different method of ler.rying assessments for similar or additional pqposes ftom those set forth in this part. A property and business improvement district created pursuant to this partis expressly exempt ftom the provisions of the SpecialAssessment Investigation, Limitation and Maiority Protest Act of 1931 (Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800)). 36603.5. Part prevails over conflicting provisions
Any provision of this part that conflicts with any other provision of law shall ptevail ovet the other ptovision of law, as to districts created under dris pat.
36604. Severabiliw
This part is intended to be constmed liberally and,if any provision is held invalid, the remaining ptovisions shall remain in fi-rll force and effect. Assessments levied under this part are not special taxes.

ARTICLE 2. Definitions
36606. "Activities"
'i\ctivities" means, but is not limited to, all of the following that benefit businesses or real property in the district:
(a) Promotion of public events.
@) Furnishing of music in any public place.
(c) Promotion of tourism within the district.
(d) Marketing and economic development, including retail retention and recruifinent. (e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to those normally provided by the municipality. (f) Other services provided for the pwpose of conferring special beneflt upon assessed real property or specific benefits upon assessed businesses located in the district. 36606.5. "Assessment"
"Assessment" means a lelry for the purpose of acquidng, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements and ptoviding activities that wili provide cettain benefits to properties or businesses located vdthin a property and business improvement disttict.
f,Sfl[. t'Business"
"Business" means all types of businesses and includes financial institutions and professions.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 34

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
36608. "Ciw"
"City" means a city, county, city and county, ot an
^geflcy
or entity created pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Tide 1 of the Government Code, the public membet agencies of which inciudes only cities, counties, ot a city and county, or the State of California. 36609. "Citv councilt'
"Cit1' council" means the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county, ot the agency, commission, or board created pursuant to a ioint powers agreement and which is a city within the meaning of this part. 36609.4. "CIedC'
"Clerk" means the cierk of the legislative body
36609.5. "General benefit"
"General benefit" means, fot pu4)oses of a properq'-based disuict, any benef,t that is not a "special benefit" as defined in Section 3661.5.5.
36610. "Imnrovementtt
"Improvement" means the acquisition, constnrction, installation, ot maintenance of an1' tangible proPer6'with an estimated useful life of five years or more including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Parking facilities.
(b) Benches, booths, kiosks, display cases, pedestdan sheiters and signs. (c) Trash receptacles and public restrooms.
(d) Lighting and heating facilities.
(e) Decorations.
(fl Parks.
(g) Fountains.
ft) Planting areas.
(i) Closing, opening, widening, ot narrowing of existing streets. 0 Facilities or equipment, or both, to enhance security of persons and property within the district. (k) Ramps, sidewalks, plazas,and pedestdan malls.

Q Rehabilitation ot removal of existing structures.
366ll. "Management district plan"; ttPlantt
"A{anagement district plan" or "plan" meafls a proposal as defined in Section 36622. 36612. ttOwners' associationtt
"Owners' association" means a private nonprofit entity that is under contract with a city to administer or implement improvements, maintenance, and activities specified in the management disttict plan. An ownets' association may be an existing nonprofit entity or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners' association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity fot any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials fot any pu{pose.

Notwithstanding this section, an owners' association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 ofTtie 5 of the Govetnment Code), at all times when mattets within the subject matter of the district are heard, discussed, or deliberated, and with the Califomia Public Recotds Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) ofTide 1 of the GovernmentCode), foralltecordstelatingtoactivities of thedistrict. 36614. "Prooertv"
"Properq"'means real property situated within a district.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 35

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
36614.5. ttProperty and business improvement district"l ttDistrict" "Property and business imptovement district," or "district," means a ptoperqr and business improvement distlct established putsuant to this part.
36674.6. "Property-based assessmentt'
"Property-based assessment" means any assessment made pursuant to this part upon real propetty 36614,7 . "Prooertv-based district"
"Propetq'-based district" means afly disttict in which a city levies a property-based assessment. 36615. ttPropert5r owner"l "Business ownet'tl ttOmer"
"Property on'net" means afly person shown as the owner of land on the last equalized assessment toll or od-rerwise known to be the owner of land by dre city council. "Business owner" means an)' person recognized by the ciq' as the owner of the business. "Owner" means either a business owfler or a propefty owner. The city council has no obl-igation to obtain other information as to the ownership of land or businesses, and its determination of ownership shall be final and, conclusive for the pwposes of dtis part. Wherever this part requi-res the signature of the property ownet, the signature of the authorized agent of the property o.rvner shall be sufficient. !(/herever this part requfues the signature of the business owfler, the signatwe of the authodzed agent of the business owner shall be sufficient. 36615.5. "Special benefit"
(a) "special benefiC' means, fot pulposes of a property-based disttict, a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in a distict or to the public at large. Special benefit includes incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of properq'-based distticts even if those incidental or collateral effects benefit property or persons not assessed. Special benefit excludes general enhancement of property value. (b) "special benefiC' also includes, for pulposes of a property-based district, a particular and distinct benefit provided direcdy to each assessed parcel within the district. Merely because parcels thtoughout afl assessment distict share the same special benefits does not make the benefits general.
36616. "Tenanttt
"Tenant" means an occuparit pwsuant to a lease of commercial space or a dwelling unit, othet than an owner.

ARTICLE 3. Prior Law
36617. Altemate method of financing certain improvements and activities; Effect on other provisions This part provides an alternative method of financing cetain improvements and activities. The provisions of this part shall not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or ptoviding for the firnishing of improvements or activities ot the raising of revenue for these purposes. Every improvement area established putsuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 @art 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of this division) is valid and effective and is unaffected by this p^tt.

CHAPTER 2. Establishment
36620. Establishment of property and business improvement district A property and business imptovement district may be established as provided in this chapter. 36620.5. Requirement of consent of ciry council
Flistoric Folsom PBID Management District Plan 36

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

A county may riot form a district within the territoriai judsdiction of a city without the consent of the city council of that city.

A city may riot form a district u.ithin the unincorporated territory of a county without the consent of the board of supervisors of that county. A city may not form a disuict within the territorial jurisdiction of another city without the consent of the city council of the other city.
3662l.lntiation of proceedings; Petition of property or business owners in proposed district (a) Upon the submission of a wdtten petition, signed by the property or business owners in the proposed districtwho will pay more than 50 percent of the assessments proposed to be levied, the city council may initiate proceedings to form a distdct by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to form a district. The amount of assessment attributable to properfy or a business owned by the same property ot business ownet that is in excess of 40 petcent of the amount of ail assessments proposed to be levied, shall not be included in determining whether the pet-ition is srgned by property or business owners who will pay more than 50 percent of the total amount of assessments proposed to be levied.
0) Th. petition of property or business owriers required under subdivision (a) shall include a summary of the management district plan. That summaq' shall include ali of the following:
(1) A map showing the boundaries of the district.
(2) Information speci4'ing where the complete management district plan can be obtained. (3) Information speci$,ing that the complete mariagement district plan shall be furnished upon request. (c) The resolution of intention described in subdivision (a) shali contain all of the following:
(1) A brief descdption of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment wili be levied on Propefty or businesses within the district, a statement as to whether bonds wil be issued, and a description of the exterior boundades of the proposed district, which may !s rn24s by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable afl owner to generally identi4' the nature and extent of the improvements, fiuintenaflce, and activities, and the location and extent of the ptoposed district.
(2) A time and piace for a public hearing on the establishment of the property and business imptovement distdct and the lery of assessments, which shall be consistent urith the requirements of Section 36623. 36622, Contents of management district plan
The management district plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the disttict in suff,cient detail to locate each patcel of property and, if businesses aie to be assessed, each business within the district. If the assessmentwill be levied on businesses, ^ m^p th^t identifies the district boundades in sufficient detail to allow a business ownet to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. If the assessment will be levied on proPerty and businesses, a map of the district in suff,cient detail to locate each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably deterrnine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. @) The name of the proposed district.
(c) A descnption of the boundaries of the district, including the boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establ-ishment or extension 'tn a manner sufficient to identi$' the affected property and businesses included, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the cletk. The boundaries of a proposed property assessment district shall not ovedap with the boundaries of another exisring property assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundades of a district created pursuant to this part to ovedap with other assessment districts established pursuant to othet provisions of law, including but not limited to, the Parking and Business ImprovementArea Law of 1989 (?art 6 (commencingwith Section 36500)). This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to ovetlap with anotler business assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to ovedap with a property assessment disftict created Pursuant to this part. (d) The improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed fot each year of operation of the district and the estimated cost thereof. If the imptovements, maintenance, and activities proposed fot eachyear of operation are the same, a description of the first yeat's proposed imptovements, maintenance, and activities and a statement that the same improvements, firaintenance, and activities are proposed fot subsequent yeats shall satisfit the tequirements of this subdivision.
(e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance, or activities, and debt service in each year of operation of the district. If the assessment is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 37

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
upon the assessment rate. If the total annual amouot proposed to be expended in each year ofopetation of the district is not significantly different, the amount ptoposed to be expended in the iitialyear and a statement that a similar amount applies to subsequent yeats shall satis$r the requirements of this subdivision. (f) The proposed source or soulces of financing including the proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property or business ownet to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against their property or business. The plan also shall state whethet bonds will be issued to finance imptovements. fu) The time and manner of collecting the assessments.
(h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years. Notrvithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuarrt to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may lery assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The management district plan may set forth specific increases in assessments for each year of operation of the district.
(i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of the management district plan. 0 Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the disttict'

0.)
(1) A list of the propetties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessot's parcel numbets for properies to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property ot businesses, in propottion to the benef,t received by the property ot business, to deftay the cost theteof.

Q) ln a property-based district, the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined exclusively in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public imptovement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the activities. An assessment shall not be imposed on any parcei that exceeds the reasonable cost of the propottional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and a property-based distdct shall separate the general benefits, tf any,ftom the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a property-based distdct that are owned or used by zny ciq, public agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the governmental entity can demonsttate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. The value of any incidental, secondary, or collateral effects that arise ftom the improvements, maintenance, or activities of a property- based district and*'nt benefit propety or persons not assessed shall not be deducted ftom the entirety of rhe cost ofany special benefit or affect the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel. (3) In a pioperty-based district, properties thtoughout the district may share the same special benefits. In a district with boundaries that define which patcels are to teceive improvements, maintenance, or activities over and above those services provided by the crty, the imptovements, maintenance, or activities themselves may constitute a special benefit. The city may impose assessmeflts that are less than the proportional special benefit conferred, but shall not impose assessments that exceed the reasonable costs of the proportional special benefit conferted. Because one or more parcels pay less than the special benefit conferred does not necessatily mean that other parcels are assessed more than the teasonable cost of their special benefit.

Q In a property-based district, a detailed eng'ineer's report ptePared by a registered ptofessional engineer certified b;' the State of Califomia supporting all assessments contemplated by the management disttict plan. (*) A"y other item or matter required to be incorporated therein by the city council. 36623. P tocedrfe to levy assessment
(a) If a city council proposes to ievy a new or increased property assessment, the notice and protest and headng procedute shall comply with Section 53753 of the Government Code. (b) If a city council proposes to leq' a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedwe shall compl;' with Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, except that notice shall be mailed to dre owners of the businesses proposed to be assessed. A ptotest may be made otally or in writing by any interested person. Every written protest shall be filed with the clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. The city council may waive any irreguladty in the form or content of any written protest. A written ptotest ma)r be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. Each wdtten ptotest shall cofltain a description of the business in which the person subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identifi' the business and, if a petson subscribing is not shown on the official records of the city as the ownet of the business, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the ownet of the business ot the authorized reptesentative. A written protest that does not comply with this section shall not be counted jn detertnining a majority protest. Ifwritten protests ate received from the owners ot authorized reptesentatives ofbusinesses in the proposed Histotic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 38

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
district that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are flot \tiithdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no fi.rtther proceedings to levy the ptoposed assessment against such businesses, as contained in the resolution of intention, shall be taken fot a period of one yeat ftom the date of the finding of a majority protest by the city council
(c) Ifa ciq' council proposes to conduct a single proceeding to lerry both a new or incteased proPerty assessment and a new or: increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedute fot the property assessment shall comply with subdivision (a), and the notice and protest and hearing procedure fot the business assessment shall comply with subdivision (b). If a majolity protest is received ftom either the property ot business owners, that respective portion of the assessment shall not be levied. The remaining portion of the assessment may be levied unless the improvement or other special benef,t vzas proposed to be funded by assessing both property and business ownets. 36624. Changes to proposed assessments
At the conciusion of the public hearing to establish the district, the crty council may adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify the proposed assessment or the type or types of improvements, maintenance, and activities to be funded with the tevenues ftom the assessments. Proposed assessments may only be revised by reducing any or all of them. At the public hearing, the city council may only make changes in, to, or ftom the boundaries of the proposed property and business imptovement distdct that will exclude teritory that will not benef,t from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities. Any modifications, revisions, teductions, or changes to the proposed assessment district shall be teflected in the notice and map recotded pursuant to Section 36627.
36625. Resolution of formation
(a) If the city council, following the public hearing, decides to establish a proposed property and business improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of formation that shall include, but is not limited to, ail of the following:
(1) A brief descdption of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district, a statement on whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exteriot boundaries of the proposed district, which ma1' fs rn2ds by reference to any plan or map that is on &le with the clerk. The descriptions and statements need not be detailed and shall be sufficient if they gn2lls 2n owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenznce, and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district.
(2) The number, date of adoption, and tide of the resolution of intention. (3) The time and place where the public hearing was held concerning the establ-ishment of the district. (4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city shall not establish the district or levy assessments tf a maloiq protest was received.
(5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be subject to any amendments to this Part. (6) A statement that the improvements, maintenance, and activities to be conferred on businesses and properties in the district wili be funded by the levy of the assessments. The revenue ftom the ler'y of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide improvements, maintenance, or activities outside the district or fot any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resoiution of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing concerning establishment of the district. Notwithstanding the foregoing, improvements and activities that must be provided outside the district boundaries to create a special or specific benefit to the assessed parcels or businesses rnalr fs provided, but shall be limited to marketing or signage pointing to the district.
(7) A finding that the property or businesses within the arca of the property and business improvement district will be benefited by the improvements, maintenance, and activities funded by the proposed assessments, and, for a propefiy-based district, that propetty within the district will receive a special benefit. (8) In a property-based districg the total amourit of all special benefits to be conferred on the ptoperties within the propefiy-based district.
(b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if requLed, recordation of the notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 sha\. constjtute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years referred to in the management district plan.
36627. Notice and assessment diagram
Histotic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 39

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Folloudng adoption of the resolution establishing district assessments on properties pursuant to Section 36625, the clerk shall record a notice and an assessment diagram pursuant to Section 3114. No otler provision of Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100) applies to an assessment distdct cteated putsuant to this part. 36628. Establishment of separate benefit zones within district; Categories of businesses The city council may establish one or more separate benefit zones within the district based upon the degtee of benefit derived from the improvements or activities to be provided within the benef,t zone and may impose a different assessment within each benefit zone. If the assessment is to be levied on businesses, the city council may also define categodes of businesses based upon the degree of benefit that each will derive ftom the improvements or activities to be provided within the district and may impose a different assessmerit or rate of assessment on each c tegory of business, or on each category of business within each 36628.5. Assessments on businesses or ProPerty owners
The city council may ler,y assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to this part.

The city council shall structure the assessments in v/hatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, provided that any propefiy-based assessment conforms with the requirements set forth in p^t gr^ph (2) of subdivision (k) of Section 36622. 36629. Provisions and procedures applicable to benefit zones ,urd business categories ,{ll provisions of this part appl-icable to the establishment, modification, ot disestablishment of a property and business improvement district apply to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of benefit zones or categories of business.

The crq' council sha11, to establish, modiS, or disestablish a benefit zofle ot category of business, follow the procedure to establish, modify, or disestablish a propety and business improvement disttict. 36630. Expiration of district; Creation of new district If a property and business improvement district expires due to the time limit set pursuant to subdivision (r) of Section 36622, a new ffunagement district plan may be created and the district may be renewed pursuant to this part.

CHAPTER 3. Assessments
36631. Time and manner of collection of assessments; Delinquent Payments The collection of the assessments levied pursuarit to this part shall be rrnde zt the time and in the manner set forth by the city council in the resolution leryng the assessmeflt. Assessments levied on real property may be collected at the same time and in the same lnanner as for the ad valorem properry tax, and may provide for the same lien priority and penalties fot delinquent payment. All delinquent payments for assessments levied pursuant to this p^tt ffr^y be charged intetest and penalties. 36632. Assessments to be based on estimated benefit; Classification of real property and businesses; Exclusion of residential and agricultural property
(a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the real property within the property and business imptovement district. The city council may classi$, properties for purposes of determifling the benefit to property of the implovements and activities provided pursuant to this p^rt.
(b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses within the property and business imptovement district. The city council may classify businesses fot purposes of detetmining the benefit to the businesses of the improvements and activities provided putsuant to this p^rt.
(c) Ptoperties zoned solely fot residential use, or that are zoned for agricultural use, are conclusively ptesumed not to benefit ftom the improvements and service funded through these assessments, and shall not be subiect to any assessment pusuant to this part.

Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 40

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
36633. Time for contesting validity of assessment
The validity of an assessment levied under this part shall not be contested in an action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within 30 days after the resolution ievying the assessment is adopted pursuaflt to Section 36625. An appeal ftom a final judgment in an action or proceeding shall be perfected within 30 days after the entry of judgment. 36634. Service contracts authorized to establish levels ofcity services The city council rnay execute baseline service contracts that would establish levels of city services that would continue after a property and business improvement district has been formed. 36635. Request to modiry management districtplan
Tlre owners' association may, at ^rry time, tequest that the city couocil modrS' the management district plan. Ant' m66i6.uoott of the management distdct plan shall be made pursuant to this chapter. 36636. Modification of plan by resolution after public hearing; Adoption of resolution of intention (a) Upon the written request of the owners' association, dre city council may modiS' the management disttict plan after conducting one public headng on the proposed modifications. The city council may modify the improvements and activities to be funded with the revenue dedved from the levy of the assessments by adopting a resolution determining to make the modif,cations after holding a public hearing on the proposed modiflcations. If the modification includes the lery of a new or increased assessment, the city council shall comply with Section 36623.

Notice of all other public hearings pursuant to this section shall comply with both of the following:
(1) The resolution of intention shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city once at least seven days before the public hearing.
(2) A complete copy of the resolution of intention shall be mailed by fust class mail, at least 10 da1's lsf61s the public headng, to each business owner or properq/ ornner affected by the proposed modification. @) Th. city council shall adopt a tesolution of intention which states the proposed modification pdor to the public hearing required by this section. The public hearing shall be held not more than 90 days after the adoption of the resolution of .intention.
36637. Reflection of modification in notices recorded and maps Any subsequent modification of the tesolution shall be reflected in subsequent notices and maps recorded pursuant to Division

4.5 (commencing with Section 3100), in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 36627.

CHAPTER3.5. Financing
36640. Bonds authorizedl Procedure; Restriction on reduction or temination of assessments (a)The crq' council may, by resolution, determine and declare that bonds shall be issued to finance the estirnated cost of some or all of the proposed improvements described in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, tfthe resoiution of formation adopted pursuant to that section provides for the issuance of bonds, under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 pivision 10 (commencing with Section 8500)) or in conjunction with Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Tide 1 of the Government Code). Either act, as the case may be, shall govem the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds, although proceedings under the Bond Act of 1915 ma)' be modified by the city council as necessary to accommodate assessments levied upon business pursuant to this part. 0) Th. resolution adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall generally describe the proposed improvements specified in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, set forth the estimated cost of those improvements, speci!' the number of annual instalLments and the fiscal ysar5 during which they are to be collected. The amount of debt service to retire the bonds shali not exceed the amount of tevenue estimated to be raised ftom assessmeflts over 30 years.

Histotic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 41

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, assessments levied to pay the principal and interest on any bond issued pursuant to this section shall not be reduced or tetminated if doing so would interfere with the timely retfuement of the debt.

CHAPTER 4. Governance
36650. Report by owners' associationl Approval or modifiication by city council (a) The ownefs' association shall cause to be ptepated a report fot each fiscal year, except the first year, fot which assessmeflts are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvements, mairitenance, and activities described in the repott. The ownets' associatron's first report shall be due after the fust vear of operation of the district. The report may propose changes, including but not limited to, the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or an)' benefit zones within the district, the basis and method of levying the assessments, and any changes in the classification ofproperty, including an1' categories ofbusiness, ifa classification is used. @) The report shall be f,led with the clerk and shail refet to the property and business improvement district by name, speci!' the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with tespect to that fiscal year, shall contain a1l of the following information:
(1) Any proposed changes in the boundades of the property and business improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of property or businesses within the disrict. (2) The improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. (3) An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements, maintenance, and activities for that fiscal year. (4) The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each reai propetty or business owner, as appropriate, to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied aginst his ot her property or business fot that fiscal yeat.
(5) The estimated amount of an1. 5g1p6r or deficit revenues to be carried over ftom a previous fiscal year. (6) The estimated amount of any contributions to be made ftom sources other than assessments levied Prilsuant to this part.
(c) The city council may approve the report as filed by the owners' association or may modifi any particulal contained in the report and approve it as modified. Any modification shall be made pursuant to Sections 36635 and36636.

The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessments that would impair an authodzed or executed contract to be paid from the tevenues derived ftom the levy ofassessments, including any commitment to pay pdnctpal and interest on any bonds issued on behalf of the district. 36651. Designation of owners' association to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities Tlre management district plan rnay, but is not tequired to, state that an ownets' association wili provide the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in dre management disttict plan. If the managemeflt disttict plan designates an owtters' association, the city shail contract with the designated nonptofit corpotation to provide services.

CHAPTERS. Renewal
36660. Renewal of district; Transfer or refund of remaining revenues; District tetm Iimit (a) Any district previously established whose term has expired, or will expire, may be renewed by follovdng the procedures for establishment as provided in this chapter. @) Upon renewal, any remaining revenues derived from the levy of assessments, or any tevenues derived ftom the sale ofassets acquired with the revenues, shall be transferred to the renewed district. Ifthe renewed districtincludes additional parcels or businesses not included in the prior district, the remaining revenues shall be spent to benefit onll' the parcels or businesses in the priot district. If the renewed district does not include parcels or businesses included in the prior district, the remaining revenues attributable to these parcels shall be refunded to the owners of these parcels or businesses.
(c) Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 1's21s, or, if the district is authorized to issue bonds, until the maximum maturity of those bonds. There is no requirement that the boundaries, assessmeflts, improvements, or activities of a renewed district be the same as the original or pdor district.

CHAPTER 6. Disestablishment
Flistoric Folsom PBID Management Disttict Plan 42

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
36670. Circumstances permitting disestablishment of districtl Procedure (a) Any district estabiished or extended pursuant to the ptovisions of this parg whete there is no indebtedness, outstanding and unpaid, incured to accomplish any of the purposes of the district, may be disestablished byresolution by the city council in either of the following c.itcumstances:
(1) If the city council finds there has been misappropriation of funds, malfeasance, or a violation of law in connection with the management of the district, it shall notice aheaing on disestablishment. (2) During the operation of the disttic! thete shall be a 30-day period each year in which assessees nuy request disestablishment of the disttict. The fust such period shall begin one year after the date of establishment ofthe district and shali condnue for 30 days. The next such 30-day pedod shall begin nvo years after the date of the establishment of the district. Each successiveyear of operation of the district shall have such a 30-day period. Upon the wdtten petition of the owners or authodzed representatives of real property or the olilners or authorized rcpresentatives of businesses in the district who pay 50 percent or more of the assessments levied, the city council shall pass a resoludon of intention to disestablish the district.

The city council shall notice a headng on disestablishment. (b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention to disestablish the district priot to the public hearing required by this section. The resolution shall state the reason for the disestablishment, shall state the time and place of the public hearing and shall contain a proposal to dispose of any assets acquired with the revenues of the assessments levied within the property and business improvement district. The notice of the hearing on disestablishment required by this section shail be given by mail to the property owner of each parcel or to the owner of each business subject to assessment in the district, as appropriate. The city shall conduct the public headng not less than 30 days after mailing the notice to the property or business owners. The public hearing shall be held not more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention.
36671. Refund of remaining revenues upon disestablishment or expiration without tenewal of district; Calculation of refund; Use of outstanding revenue collected after disestablishment of district (a) Upon the disestablishment or expiration without renewal of a district, any temaining revenues, after all outstanding debts ate paid, derived ftom the levy of assessments, or derived ftom the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, or from bond reselve or construction funds, shall be refunded to the owners of the property or businesses then located and opetating within the district in which assessments were levied by applylng the same method and basis that was used to calculate tlle assessments levied in the fiscal year in which the district is disestablished or expires. All outstanding assessmerit revenue collected aftet disestablishment shall be spent on improvements and activities specified in the management district plan.
(b) If the disestablishment occurs before an assessment is Ievied for the fiscal lear, the method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the immediate prior fiscal year shall be used to calculate the amount of any refund.

Historic Folsom PBID Management Disttict PIan 43

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX 3 - MAP
Zone
IIInI
1A
'tB
2 3
4 Historic Folsom PBID
Q)
(
d
.l
o$
"(F,s
\o
.""t
F
RuurBrt"
d-
k
os\
d
.c
st *",ott i;"o*vrro
O'$vOooxio.

P.a
&cr
ttf a
VITAS
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan M

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX 4 - PARCEL ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
MapKey APN Lot SqFt Rate Assessment Zone COEF
1 07000100170000 38,180 0.15 $5,727.00 1A COM
2 07000320020000 1.2,632 0.075 ff947.40 4 COM
.) 07000320050000 62,726 0.075 fi4,704.45 4 COM
4 07000330020000 1.0,454 0.075 $784.05 4 COM
5 07000330030000 50,094 0.075 $3,757.05 4 COM
6 07000340010000 56,1.92 0.075 $4,21.4.40 4 COM
7 07000340020000 69,260 0.075 $5,194.50 4 COM
8 07000410010000 47,91.6 0.075 $3,593.70 4 COM
9 07000410020000 7,405 0.075 $ss5.38 4 COM
10 07000410030000 49,223 0.075 fi3,697.73 4 COM
1,1 07000420010000 27,007 0.075 fiz,025.53 4 COM
1,2 07000420020000 27,443 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
1,3 07000420030000 6,534 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
1,4 07000450030000 18,600 0 $0.00 4 sF'R / NA
15 07000450060000 2,800 0 $o.oo 4 SFR / NA

1.6 07000450070000 2,800 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
17 07000450080000 5,600 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
18 07000450090000 2,800 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
19 07000450100000 3,500 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
20 07000450130000 5,250 0 $o.oo 4 SF'R / NA
21 07000450140000 8,750 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
22 07000450150000 1.9,602 0.075 $1,470.15 4 COM
23 07000450170000 5,250 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
24 07000450190000 9,1.48 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
25 07000450200000 15,246 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
26 07000450230000 1,,750 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
27 07000450260000 52,708 0.075 $3,953.10 4 COM
28 07000450270000 54,01.4 0.075 $4,051.05 4 COM
29 07000450280000 6,970 0.075 fi522.75 4 COM
30 07000450290000 2,325 0 $o.oo 4 SFR / NA
31 07000450310000 5,250 0 $o.oo 4 SFR / NA
32 07000450320000 1.3,950 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
33 07000450370000 7,500 0 $o.oo 4 SF'R / NA
34 07000450380000 11,100 n $o.oo 4 SFR / NA
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 45

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
35 07000460140000 7,000 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
36 07000460150000 7,055 0 $o.oo 4 SFR / NA
37 07000460160000 4,565 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
3B 07000460210000 24,500 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
39 07000460220000 1.5,720 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
40 07000460230000 10,500 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
41 07000460240000 28,125 o $o.oo 4 SFR / NA
42 07000460260000 56J92 n $0.00 4 SFR / NA
43 07000460330000 6,052 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
44 07000460340000 1.0,376 0 $0.00 4 SFR / NA
45 07000510320000 1.6,840 0 $0.00 .) SFR / NA
46 07000510420000 96,703 0.085 fi8,219.76 J COM
47 07000510430000 3,277 0.085 fi273.45 J COM
48 07000510500000 15,489 0.085 ff1,,31,6.57 -) COM
49 07000510570000 1.68,577 0.085 fi1,4,329.05 J COM
50 07000510580000 9,913 0 $o.oo -) SFR / NA
51 07000520010000 1.,742 0.085 $148.07 2 TEINP/R
52 07000520020000 1,625 0.085 $138.13 2 TE,/NP/R
53 07000520050000 3,500 0.17 $ses.00 2 COM
54 07000520090000 4,200 0.17 $714.00 2 COM
55 07000520100000 4,900 0.77 $833.00 2 COM
56 07000520110000 9,921 0.17 $1,686.57 2 COM
57 07000520120000 1.,750 0.17 fi297.50 2 COM
58 07000520130000 1.,875 0.17 $318.75 2 COM
59 07000520140000 1,875 0.17 $318.75 2 COM
60 07000520150000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
61 07000520170000 1.,750 0.17 $2e7.50 2 COM
62 07000520180000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
63 07000520190000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
64 07000520220000 15,61.1 0.15 fiz,341.65 1A COM
65 07000520230000 1.92,700 0.15 $28,815.00 1A COM
66 07000520240000 21.,092 0.15 $3,163.80 1A COM
67 07000520250000 7,952 0.17 $1,351.84 1B COM
6B 07000520260000 23,943 0.15 $3,591.45 1A COM
69 07000520270000 55,757 0.15 $8,363.55 1A COM
70 07000610100000 26,060 0.17 fi4,430.20 2 COM
71 07000610110000 5,394 0.17 $916.98 2 COM
72 07000610130000 4,81.2 0.17 $818.04 2 COM
t3 07000610140000 5,527 0.17 $93e.5e 2 COM
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 46

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
74 07000610150000 14,000 0.17 $2,380.00 2 COM
75 07000940120000 5,473 0.17 $e30.41 2 COM
76 07001010010000 7,260 0.17 $1,234.20 2 COM
77 07001010020000 5,600 0.77 $952.00 2 COM
7B 07001010030000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
79 07001010040000 5,250 0.17 $892.s0 2 COM
BO 07001010050000 7,750 0.1,7 $2e7.s0 2 COM
81 07001010060000 2,660 0.17 ff452.20 2 COM
82 07001010070000 4,060 0.17 $690.20 2 COM
83 07001010290000 21,649 0.77 $3,680.33 2 COM
84 07001030050000 1.3,51.0 0.17 fi2,296.70 2 COM
B5 07001030060000 4,830 0.17 $821.10 2 COM
86 07001030070000 5,663 0.17 ffg62.71 2 COM
87 07001030080000 3,220 0.17 $547.40 2 COM
B8 07001030090000 2,800 0.17 $476.00 2 COM
89 07001030100000 3,640 0.77 $618.80 2 COM
90 07001030170000 13,440 0.17 fi2,284.80 2 COM
91 07001030190000 8,960 0.085 $761.60 2 TE,/NP/R
92 07001050020000 5,600 0.17 $es2.oo 2 COM
93 07001050030000 3,500 0.17 $5es.oo 2 COM
94 07001050040000 3,500 0.77 $ses.oo 2 COM
95 07001050050000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
96 07001050060000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
97 07001050070000 2,800 0.17 $476.00 2 COM
9B 07001050080000 2,800 0.17 $476.00 2 COM
99 07001050090000 2,800 0.17 $476.00 2 COM
100 07001050100000 3,906 0.17 ff664.02 2 COM
101 07001050110000 5,629 0.17 $956.76 2 COM
1,02 07001050120000 3,066 0.77 $521.22 2 COM
103 07001050180000 4,670 0.17 $783.70 2 COM
104 07001050190000 3,808 0.17 ff647.36 2 COM
105 07001110010000 1.,549 0.17 $263.33 2 COM

1.06 07001110020000 5,451 0.17 fie26.67 2 COM
1,07 07001110030000 7,000 0.17 $1,190.00 2 COM
108 07001 1 10040000 7,000 0.1,7 $1,190.00 2 COM
1,09 07001 1 10050000 1.,750 0.17 $297.s0 2 COM
110 07001110060000 1.,750 0.17 fi297.50 2 COM
1,1,1 07001 1 10090000 3,700 0.17 $629.00 2 COM
112 07001110100000 7,400 0.77 $1,258.00 2 COM
Histotic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 47

04/11/2023 Item No.7.
773 07001110110000 9,900 0 $o.oo 2 SFR/ NA
714 070011 10170000 4,313 0.77 ff733.21 2 COM
775 07001110190000 6,250 0 $o.oo 2 SFR / NA
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 48

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX 5 -TOTALESTIMATED MAXIMUM COST OF

IMPROVEMENTS, MAINTENANCE, AND ACTIVITIES
The estimated maximum cost of the line items below was developed based on the estimated costs of providing services in the proposed HFPBID. The costs below are esdmated; the actual line item costs will fluctuate. The table below shows expenditures from assessment and non-assessed funds.

Assessment funds are govemed by Section VI. There is no limit on reallocation of non-assessment funds by the Owners'Association. The total maximum budget may exceed the maximum listed in this table if parcel ownership changes result in parcels being assessed at a higher rate due to a highet estimated benefit.

Year Advocacy &
Program
Coordination
Image
Enhancement
Enhanced
Maintenance
Contingency
Reserve
County/C
ity
Fee
Total
2024 fi63,1,53.43 ff60,926.47 $43,006.93 $7,186.54 $5,389.90 fi179,663.27 2025 $65,048.03 fi62,754.26 fi44,297.1.4 $7,402.1.4 $5,551.60 $185,053.17 2026 fi66,999.47 fi64,636.89 fi45,626.05 fi7,624.20 $5,718.15 $190,604.76 2027 $69,009.45 $66,576.00 ff46,994.83 fi7,852.93 $5,889.69 ff1,96,322.90 2028 fi77,079.73 $68,573.28 $48,404.67 $8,088.52 $6,066.38 fi202,272.58 2029 fi73,21,2.1,2 $70,630.48 $49,856.81 $8,331.18 fi6,248.37 ff208,278.96 2030 $75,408.48 $72,749.39 fi51,,352.51. $8,581.12 fi6,435.82 fi21,4,521.32 2031, fi77,670.73 ff74,931..87 $52,893.09 $8,838.55 $6,628.89 ff220,963.1.3 2032 $80,000.85 ff77,179.83 $54,479.88 $9,103.71 fi6,827.76 fi227,592.03 2033 $82,400.88 $79,495.22 fi56,774.28 fig,376.82 $7,032.59 fi234,419.79 Total $723,983.17 $698,453.69 $493,026.19 $82,385.71 $61,789.15 $2,059,637.91 Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 49

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

APPENDIX 6 - BASELINE SERVICES PROVIDED
The City of Folsom will condnue to provide a baseline level of services throughout the District, consistent with services provided to parcels outside the District. The tables below show the baseline level of services as of August 2022; these services may only be reduced in the event of a city-wide sewice teduction.

Police: Patol City of Folsom
Police Department
Paftol services will be
provided as directed by
an established patrol
staffinq plan.

Police: Special
Problems Units
City of Folsom
Police Departrnent
Special enforcement
units handle issues
involvinggangs and the
selling of drugs in the
City of Folsom, as
needed
Police: Graffiti
Abatement
City of Folsom
Police Depattrnent
When observed,
officers advise City
crews of abatement
needed.

Private properry clean-
up is the responsibility
of the properfy owner.

Potce: Parking
Enforcement
City of Folsom
Police Department
Officers patrol the
Histotic District
^s
p^rt
of their standard tour of
duty. This includes
enforcement of patking
regulations for vehicles
utilizing public parking
lots and on-street
parking.

Historic District has
testricted parking (time
limits and residential
permits) and receives
regular patrols from
parking enforcement.

Provisions exist to
allow employee
patking in some time-
limited parkins lots
Police/Fire: Special
Events
City of Folsom
Police Department and Fire
Departrnent
Police and Fire
D epartrnent s taff review
request for special
events, and provide
personnel as
outlined/required in the
Special Event Permits.

Unless waived by the
City Council, special
events require the
promoter/sponsor to
pay Police andf or Fire
Department expenses.

None ProvidedSecurity Guards
Private Security Individual Property Ownets Hiring own secudty for localized security
services in parking lots,
gatages, building
interiors and perimeters.

SAFETY, POLICING & SECURTTY
Level of ServiceAc ible Comments
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 50

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Flistoric Folsom
Station Plaza
Ciw of Folsom Ongoing clean-up,
lands caping maintenance
Event impacts paid by
sponsor and as also
specified in Special Event
permit conditions
Parking Garage City of F'olsom Ongoing maintenance
Public Resffooms
Secudty Issues
City of Folsom Ongoing maintenance Event impacts paid by sponsor and as also
specified in Special Event
permit conditions
Signage - street signs
and intelpretive
amenities
City of Folsom Ongoing maintenance Changeable content of signage managed by
FHDA
Street Ughting City of Folsom Lights changed on an as-
needed basis. The Public
Iforks Department is
responsible for upkeep
and maintenance of
street lighting.

Graffiti Removal City of F'olsom
Code Enforcement
As identified and
response based.

On public property
Sidewalks General City of Folsom
Public Works Deparffnent
Make necessary rcpurs
when needed for safety
and aesthetics
Sidewalk Receptacles
and Benches
City of Folsom
Parks and Recreation
Departrnent
Install, replace &
maintain benches,
receptacles and recycling
receptacles in the historic
zte )as needed.

Drinking Fountains,
Public Art and other
Street furniture
City of Folsom
Parks and Recreation
Departrnent
Ongoing Maintenance
Alley City of Folsom
Public Works Department
Respond to service
requests on an as-needed
basis.

Maintenance: Vacant
lots
City of Folsom
Code Enforcement
Property owners can
report owners who do
not upkeep their lots.
(e.g. junk and debris,
weeds)
If delinquent, City may
pursue lawfirl means to
cotrecdon violation
Level of Service CornmentsP^.ty
Histotic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 51

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Parking: Off-street
Public Lots
City of F'olsom
Public \ilforks Departrnent
Street crews clean trash
and debds monthly or by
location with Service
Request. Potholes and
bumper repairs ate
performed on an as-
needed basis.

Parking: On-street City of Folsom
Public Works Departrnent
Maintain parking spaces.
, on as needed basis.

Cleaning scheduled to
avoid disrupting parking
demand.

Stteet General
Maintenance
City of Folsom
Public Works Departrnent
Respond to Service
Requests as needed for
trash, debds, accidents
and potholes. Skin
patching, base repairs
and as-scheduled or
coordinated with other
ptojects.

Routine pothole patching
with cold patch during
raining weather. Skin
patch and base repair
when clear and in wafiner
weather. City shall
continue to be
responsible for all street
maintenance.

Sfteet: Sweeping City of Folsom
Public Works Departrnent
Arterials and Collectors
Downtown:2 times per
yeat
Parking lots and alLeys: 2-
3 times perye t
Trash Collection:

Business
Propety Owners Each owner shall be
responsible for trash
collection to ensure a
clean and tidied trash
atea.

Trash Collection:

Sidewalk receptacles
City of Folsom
Public \X/orks Department
Provide trash collection
for sidewalk containers 3
days per week
Service is provided only
in Sutter Street
commercial core are
Trash Collection:

Removal of Signs on
Public Poles
City of Folsom
Code Enforcement
On an as-needed basis
on City owned Facilities
Code enforcement is the
responsible parq/ as most
signs are foryard and
garage sales, which is
covered by ordinance.

Landscaping: Planters City of Folsom
Parks and Recreation
Depattrnent
Maintain landscaping in
public ROW
Other landscaping is the
responsibfity of the
ptoperty ov/nef.

Level of SeruiceResponsible Cornments
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 52

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Landscaping: Tree
Tdmming
City of Folsom
Parks and Recteation
Department
Provide uee trimming
annually for trees in the
public RO\f. Respond
tohazard tree calls as
needed. Pedorm Right-
of -Way cleatance, as
needed. Perform tree
removals as needed.

Trees on private property
that encroach in RO\7,
ate ownet's tesponsibility
to maintain as needed or
requested by City Staff.

Street decotations FHDA Banners and other
seasonal elements (com
stalks, ribbons on poles,
etc)
Covered thru BID and
other FHDA fund
raising. Decorations and
banners to comply with
City codes, guidelines, or
Special Event permit
conditions.

Trash collection for
special events (Craft
fairs, TNM, Cattle
Drive, etc)
City of F'olsom
Public Works Departrnent
Event sponsor
responsible for placing
loose trash in receptacles
City responsible for
emptying receptacles
within 24 hours of event
Level of ServiceRe CommentsActiviq'
Decoradons:

Special Events
Event sponsors in
collabotation with FHDA
Seasonal decorations
provided by FHDA can
be supplemented for
special events
Decorations: Special
Events
Public Works:

Special Events
City of Folsom
Public Wotks Departrnent
Public Works Departrnent
staff review request for
special events, and
provide traffic control
personnel as
oudined/tequired in the
Special Event Pennits.

Unless waived by the
City Council, special
events requite the
promotet/sponsor to
pay Public Works
Department expenses.

OTHER SERVICES
Level of Service Comments
Historic Folsom PBID Management District Plan 53

04/11/2023 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11018 - A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to Install All-Way Stop Sign Control at the Intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In June 2022, during the Parks and Recreation Department's public outreach of Benevento Park, several complaints from community members about existing speeding issues were reported. The community members expressed concern regarding the proposed driveway access on Carpenter Hill Road and how they believed it would increase traffic and speeding along the roadway, specifically near the 90 degree turn near the northern end of Carpenter Hill Road between Owl Meadow Street and Fenceline Drive.

The project was taken to Parks and Recreation Commission on August 2,2022, and meeting minutes show that the Commission approve the Benevento Family Park Master Plan with an amendment with the following verbiage, "to continue to review potential traffic impacts and possible solutions to identifu problems."
Staff brought the item to the December 2022 Traffic Safety Committee meeting. The Committee recommended that the City Council approve an all-way stop at the corner of Owl Meadow Street and Carpenter Hill Road and relocation of the speed feedback sign contingent on the residents returning a petition that included at least ten signatures. Additionally, the 1 MEETING DATE: 411U2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11018 - A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to Install All-Way Stop Sign Control at the Intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street F'ROM: Public Works Department

04/11/2023 Item No.8.
signatures were to include the support of the property owners with homes located closest to the proposed all-way stop. On February 23,2023 the item returned to the Traffic Safety Committee with the completed petition showing neighborhood support for the proposed stop sign, satisffing the Traffic Safety Committee's recommended action from the December2022 meeting. The motion to recommend an all-way stop at the intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street to City Council was carried with unanimous support.

As with most residential intersections, the stop signs are not warranted based on traffic volume, safety, or right-of-way, and the petitioners were advised that the stop signs may not be an effective speed deterrent.

POLICY / RULE
Chapter 10.12 of the Folsom Municipal Code grants the City Council final authority with respect to the placement of new stop signs.

ANALYSIS
This item was considered by the Traffic Safety Committee at its December 8, 2022 and February 23,2023 meetings, and the Committee voted unanimously to recommend an all-way stop control. A copy of the Action Summaries from those meetings is attached to this report.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
Installation of new signs and markings should not exceed $6,000 and will be paid out of the Traffic Safety Projects, Project No. 8023, which was included in the Fiscal Yeat 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan and is funded through Measure A (Fund 276).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has been deemed categorically exempt from environmental review

ATTACHMENTS
l. Resolution No. 11018 - A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to Install All-Way Stop Sign Control at the Intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street.

2. Action Summary - Traffic Safety Committee, December 8,2022

3. Action Summary - Traffic Safety Committee, February 23,2023

4. Map of Intersection
2 Page 120
04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
J Page 121
04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Attachment I
Resolution No. 1 101 8

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. 11018

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL ALL.WAY STOP SIGN CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF'

CARPENTER HILL ROAD AND OWL MEADOW STREET
WHEREAS' the Public Works Department received a request to evaluate traffrc safety at the intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street; and WHEREAS, the intersection is currently side street stop controlled on Owl Meadow Street; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department assessed the intersection and determined that all-way stop control is not warranted on a traffic volume, safety, or right-of-way basis; and WHEREAS, the Traffrc Safety Committee reviewed the request at its December 8,2022 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend all-way stop control once a neighborhood petition had been completed; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the completed petition in support of the stop sign at its February 23,2023 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend all-way stop control; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Traffic Safety Projects, Project No. 8023, which was included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan, utilizing the Measure A Fund (Fund 276); and
NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the Public Works Department to install all-way stop sign control at the intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this 1lth day of April2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1018

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Attachment 2
Action Summary - Traffic Safety Committee,
December 8,2022

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

City of Folsom

TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
MEETING MIi\UTES
4:00 p.m., Thursday, December 9th,2022
Effective July 7, 2022, the City of Folsom is returning to all in-person City Council, Commission, and Commiftee meetings. Remote participation for the public will no longer be offered. Everyone is invited and encouraged to aftend and pafticipate in City meetings in person.

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Meeting called to order 4:05 pm

2. ROLL CALL:

Bailey, Bosch, Delp, Galovich, McGee, Soulsby, Washburn

Present: Bailey, Bosch, Delp, McGee, Soulsby, Washburn Absent: Galovich

3. APPROVE ACTION SUMMARY
Action Summary of the regular October 27th,2022, meeting will stand approved unless any Committee member requests a revision.

Committee decided not to approve October Action Summary and asked that discussion item 6a be amended to add the following: "Bosch agreed to asking TJKM to give a presentation at a future Traffic Safety Committee Meeting".

It was asked that the retention schedule of meeting recordings be on a future agenda.

4. BUSINESS FROM FLOOWGOOD OF THE ORDER
Discuss any items not on the agenda that a member of the public wishes to bring to the Commiffee's attention. The Committee cannot take formal action on the item but can request that it be placed on a future agenda for further discussion if necessary.

5. ACTION ITEMS

1. NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES
a. TOBRURRY WAY - SPEEDING ISSUE
Delp moved and Bailey seconded, committee unanimous. Committee recommended that neighborhood start a petition for no stopping signs. Recommended that Public Works Staff implement the staff recommendations identified in the staff report. b. NATOMA STATION DRIVE/ASIICAT- SCHOOL SAFETY &

NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES
Bosch moved and Delp seconded, committee unanimous. Committee recommends tabling the discussion pending further analysis by the Public Works Department and the School District to devise the feasibility of a double "Hug and Go Lane" and the feasibility of bulb outs at Natoma Station Drive and Turnpike. c. PARKSHORE DRM AND PLAZA DRIVE - STOP SIGN

REQUEST
Minutes.Dec.8

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Bosch Moved and Delp seconded, committee unanimous. Committee recommends an all- way stop at the intersection of Parkshore Drive andPlazaDrive. d. CARPENTER HILL ROAD - SPEEDING ISSUE
Bosch moved and Delp seconded, commiffee unanimous. Committee recommended that City Council approve an all-way stop at the corner of Owl Meadow and Carpenter Hill and relocation ofthe speed feedback sign contingent on the residents returning a petition that includes at least ten signatures. Included in the signatures must be the support of homes located closest to the proposed all-way stop.

6. ADJOURI\MENT
Meeting adjoumed at 6:16 pm
Minutes.Dec.S

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Attachment 3
Action Summary -
Traffic Safety Committee, February 23,2023

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Traffic Safety Gommittee Meeting
Minutes
Public Works Conference Room | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 February 23,2023
4:00 PMF()Lst()lVI

1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: S. Bailey, Z. Bosch, J. Brausch, T. Galovich, K. Goddard, M. McGee ABSENT: M. Washburn

3. MINUTES
Approval of the Minutes of the January 23,2023, Regular Meeting.

Bosch motioned to accept the minutes.

McGee seconded the motion.

Motion canied with the following vote:

AYES: Bailey, Brausch, Galovich, Goddard
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Washburn

4. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR/GOOD OF THE ORDER
Pat Soulsby, resident, requested that Traffic Safety Committee meetings be held at a time that is more convenient for the public to affend.

Chair Bailey committed to putting the meeting time on a future agenda for discussion.

5. ACTION/DISCUSSIONITEMS
Discussion Items
d. Roles and Relevancy of Traffic Safety Committee
To accommodate meeting attendees, this item was moved to the top of the agenda.

Chair Bailey acknowledged the following attendees: Mayor Rodriguez, Vice-Mayor Chalamcherla, Public Works Director Mark Rackovan, and Public Works Engineer Ryan Chance. He introduced the item. He explained the concerns that have been raised regarding the roles and responsibilities of the TSC and how it advises City Council and city staff. 1

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Public Works Director Rackovan spoke on the historical context of the committee. He referenced City of Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 10.02. He emphasized the importance of the TSC serving as a sounding board on traffic related matters for the community members of Folsom.

Mayor Rodriguez provided additional comments and gave her perspective regarding the TSC.

Additional discussion continued by TSC members and meeting attendees.

Chairperson Bailey concluded the discussion by requesting Mayor Rodriguez consider a City CounciVTSC joint session or workshop in the future.

Project Updates
a. East Natoma/Folsom Lake Crossing Median Barrier Project Chair Bailey asked before this update began that city staffprovide a document to track all projects from when they are presented to the TSC to project completion.

Public Works Engineer Chance presented an update and explained the process behind the project.

The barrier placement was explained. Final design of the project will be presented to council in the future. He presented the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis and Sight Distance Analysis at E.

Natoma Street and Gionata Way and agreed to send it to TSC members after the meeting.

Neishborhood Issues
b. Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street
The Traffic Safety Committee recommends that City Council install an all-way stop at the intersection of Carpenter Hill Road and Owl Meadow Street and that they relocate the speed feedback sign to a more appropriate location.

Brausch proposed the motion.

Goddard seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bailey, Bosch, Galovich, McGee
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Washburn
Discussion Items
c. Creekside Apartments Crosswalk
Discussion Item 5c and Informational ltem 6e were considered jointly and the action taken is shown under Informational Items.

6. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
e. Folsom Boulevard Overcrossing Focus Group Traffic Safety Committee 2

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

The Traffio Safety Committee tabled Action/Discussion Item 5c, Creekside Apartments Crosswalk, and Informational Item 6e, Folsom Boulevard Overcrossing Focus Group Traffic Safety Committee Participation, for a future meeting.

Bosch proposed the motion.

Brausch seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bailey, Galovich, Goddard, McGee
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Washburn

7. ADJOT]RNMENT
Meeting adjourned at6;45 p.m.

J

04/11/2023 Item No.8.

Attachment 4
Map of Intersection

04/11/2023 Item No.8.
nz\lv)l\-/
to
n
I
Proposed All Way Stop Sign Location

04/11/2023 Item No.8.
: i1:li.r i. : r: i:

Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 41tU2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11019 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project F'ROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department
RE,COMMENDATION / COI]NCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11019 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources @UfR) Department identifies water infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water master plans, ongoing water condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. Through these efforts, portions of the water system have been identified as needing rehabilitation or replacement in order to improve the water distribution system reliability.

The Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project involves improvements and repairs to seven of the CrW's water distribution system existing pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations due to aging infrastructure, relocating below grade pressure reducing stations to above grade to reduce the potential of groundwater intrusion, and the installation of one new PRV station.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for design and engineering services during construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $21 1,1 18.

I

04/11/2023 Item No.9.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firms Peterson Brustad, Inc., HydroScience Engineers, Inc., and Water Works, LLC were among a group of firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this previously completed pre-qualifi cation process.

On January lI ,2023 , the City requested proposals from consultants to provide contract documents including plans, front end specifications, technical specifications, and other miscellaneous items to complete the project manual for public bid of the construction project, as well as engineering services during construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project.

On February 15, 2023, EWR received proposals from Peterson Brustad, Inc., HydroScience Engineers, Inc., and Water Works, LLC.

The proposals were evaluated by three EWR staff members for technical evaluation prior to reviewing project costs. The proposals were reviewed and scored for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant experience. The technical evaluations were scored as shown in Table I based on a maximum technical score of 75.

Consultant EWR 1 EWR 2 EWR 3 Total Average
Peterson Brustad, Inc 68 70 62 200 66.7
HydroScience Engineers, Inc 72 69 66 207 69.0
Water Works, LLC 65 64.5 55 184.5 61.5
Table I: Consultant Technical Scores without Costs
After reviewing each proposal for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant project experience, the proposals were reviewed for project costs. The fee schedules for the scope of work outlined in the request for proposal from each consultant are shown in Table 2.

Consultant Fee Amount
Peterson Brustad, Inc. $21 1,1 1 8.00
HydroScience Engineers, Inc. $245,943.00
Water Works, LLC $279.888.00
Table 2: Consultant Project Costs
Peterson Brustad, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the fee amount, past municipal project experience involving work of similar scope and complexity including staff coordination and technical knowledge and expertise for these types of projects.

Peterson Brustad, Inc. included additional design detail and project understanding compared to the other two consultants for this project including previous PRV station design and water system 2 Page 134
04/11/2023 Item No.9.
modeling experience, specifically within the City of Folsom. Table 3 shows the overall total scores including project costs based on a maximum score of 100.

Consultant Technical
Score (Ave.)
Cost Score Total Score
Peterson Brustad, Inc. 66.7 25.0 91.7
HydroScience Engineers, Inc. 69.0 21.5 90.5
Water Works, LLC 61.5 18.9 80.4
Table 3: Consultant Overqll Scoring Including Project Costs This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for design and engineering services during construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $211,118.

F'ISCAL IMPACT
The Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capitat Improvement Plan with a total project budget of $2,005,000. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) andthe EWR Department recommends that the contract be awarded to Peterson Brustad, Inc' for $21 1 ,l 1 8.

ENVIRONMENTAL RSVTEW
This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), andlor 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATT
ResolutionNo. 11019-AResolutionAuthorizingtheCityManagertoExecuteanAgreementwith Peterson Brustad, Inc. for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
J Page 135
04/11/2023 Item No.9.

RESOLUTION NO. 11019

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH PETERSON BRUSTAD,INC. FOR DESIGN AND

ENGINEERING SERYICES DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WATER SYSTEM

FLOW CONTROL FACILITIES REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water distribution system; and
WHEREAS, the rehabilitation work identified to enhance the City's water distribution system includes rehabilitating existing water distribution pressure reducing valve stations, relocating below grade pressure reducing stations to above grade, and to continue to provide reliable water service to the City; and
WHEREAS, Peterson Brustad, Inc., by reason of their experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required consulting services for the project; and
WHEREAS, the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan with a total project budget of $2,005,000; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) in the amount of $211,1l8; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Peterson Brustad, Inc. for design and engineering services during construction for the Water System Flow Control Facilities Rehabilitation Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $21 1 , 1 I 8; and PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1lft day of April2023,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(
Councilmember(
Councilmember(
Councilmember(s ):
):
):
):

S
S
S
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1019
Page I of I Page 136
04/11/2023 Item No.9.
'i:,i ,..j ,: iit.i
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 4ltr12023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11020 - A Resolution Authotizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11020 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies sewer infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through sewer master plans and ongoing sewer condition assessment programs. As a condition of the City's State permit for its wastewater collection system, the EWR Department is required to perform ongoing condition assessments on the wastewater system and correct any defects/deficiencies identified through this process. Through these efforts, EWR staff identified the Basin 4 Sewer Phase 2 Project as a priority project' The Basin 4 Sewer Phase 2 Project consists of rehabilitating and replacing approximately 8,145 lineal feet of sanitary sewer pipeline, the rehabilitation and repair of 37 manholes, and the reconnection of approximately 132 sanitary sewer laterals. The project includes rehabilitation along Leidesdorff Street, Canal Street, Figueroa Street and Mormon Street Alley, Natoma Street and Bidwell Street Alley, Sutter Street and Figueroa Street Alley, Figueroa Street, Figueroa Street and Mormon Street Alley, and Mormon Street and Natoma Street Alley.

I

04/11/2023 Item No.10.

This project will reduce inflow and infiltration, minimize arnualmaintenance costs, and minimize the risk of sewer overflows.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $280,438.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October 20!8, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for design and construction administration services for water and wastewater projects. The consulting firms Water Works, LLC, Peterson Brustad, Inc., and Domenichelli & Associates, Inc., were among a group of firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through this previously completed pre-qualification process.

On January 9,2023,the City requested proposals from consultants to provide contract documents including plans, front end specifications, technical specifications, and other miscellaneous items to complete the project manual for public bid of the construction project, as well as engineering services during construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project. On February 7, 2023,EWR received proposals from Water Works, LLC, Peterson Brustad, Inc., and Domenichelli & Associates, Inc.

The proposals were evaluated by three EWR staff members for technical evaluation prior to reviewing project costs. The proposals were reviewed and scored for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant experience. The technical evaluations were scored as shown in Table I based on a maximum technical score of 75.

Consultant EWR 1 EWR 2 EWR 3 Total Average
Water Works, LLC 63 66.5 65 t94.5 64.8
Peterson Brustad, Inc 63 65.5 6l 189.5 63.2
Domenichelli & Associates, Inc. 67 70 57 t94 64.7
Tqble I: Consultant Technical Scores without Costs
After reviewing each proposal for project understanding, project team staffing, and recent relevant project experience, the proposals were reviewed for project costs. The fee schedules for the scope of work outlined in the request for proposal from each consultant are shown in Table 2. 2 Page 138
04/11/2023 Item No.10.

Consultant Fee Amount
Water W LLC $280,438.00
Peterson Inc $389,377.00
Domenichelli & Associates, Inc $374,619.00
Table 2: Consultant Proiect Costs
Water Works, LLC was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the fee amount, past municipal project experience involving work of similar scope and complexity including staff coordination and technical knowledge and expertise for these types of projects. Water Works, LLC included additional design detail and project understanding compared to the other two consultants for this project. Table 3 shows the overall total scores including project costs based on a maximum score of 100.

Consultant Technical
Score (Avg.)
Cost Score Total Score
Water W LLC 64.8 25.0 89.8
Peterson Inc 63.2 18.0 81.2
Domenichelli & Associates, Inc. 64.7 18.7 83.4
Table 3: Consultant Overall Scoring Including Project Costs This resolution will authorizethe City Manager to execute an agreement with Water Works, LLC for design and engineering services during construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $280,438'

FISCAL IMPACT
The Basin 4 phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement plan with a total project budget of $2,273,000. Sufficient funds are available in the Sewer Operating Fund (Fund 530) and the EWR Department recommends that the contract be awarded to Water Works, LLC for $280,438.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implernentation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 11020 - A ResolutionAuthorizingtheCity Managerto Execute anAgreementwith Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project
J Page 139
04/11/2023 Item No.10.

Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
4 Page 140
04/11/2023 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. 11020

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH WATER WORKS, LLC FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BASIN 4 PHASE 2 SEWER

REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City is currently implementing its Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) which consists of condition assessment, as well as operation and system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the sanitary sewer collection system; and
WHEREAS, Water Works, LLC by reason of their knowledge and familiarity with the project, understanding of the background and requirements of the project, and qualifications and experience of the project team, are qualified to perform the design and construction administration services; and
WHEREAS, the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project was included in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Wastewater Operating Fund (Fund 530) in the amount of $280,438; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attomey:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Water Works, LLC for Design and Engineering Services During Construction for the Basin 4 Phase 2 Sewer Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $280,438.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1lth day of April2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11020
Page I of 1 Page 141
04/11/2023 Item No.10.

This page intenti,onally left blank
to focilitate double- sided printtng .

CITY OF
FOLSOl\[

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE

04/11/2023 Item No.10.
r::.:;ir.:.i. i1 i'i]. 1
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTIQII
The Fire Department and Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and approve Resolution No. 11022 - A Resolution authorizingthe City Manager to execute an agreement with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the construction Fire Station 34 Phase-2 Project FD2234.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom Fire Department is an "Al1-Risk/All-Hazard" prevention and emergency response organization. An effective and efficient emergency response deployment capability is primarily based on resources being spatially dispersed across a community. The Folsom Fire Department currently operates from five strategibally placed fire stations within the City.

As part of the City of Folsom Fire Department strategic plan, the Fire Department Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget included the Fire Station 34 project with a total project budget of $11,860,200.

Architectural services to develop a concept design for Fire Station 34 ne complete and the station will be located in the Folsom Plan Area at Westwood Drive between Old Ranch Way and Savannah Parkway. The Fire Department has carefully examined the service delivery needs of Folsom and determined that the location is optimal for a Fire Station.

Fire Station 34 project is divided into two distinct phases which will extend into Fiscal Year 2023-24. Phase-l of the Fire Station 34 project consisted of civil engineering site 1 MEETING DATE: 4/rU2023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. I 1022 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the Construction of Fire Station 34Phase-2 Project No.

FD2234
FROM: Fire Department

04/11/2023 Item No.11.
improvements including grading, drainage, utilities, and building pad construction. This phase of construction was approved through Resolution No. 10899 on August 23,2022, and then an additional appropriation due to a change order through Resolution No. 10984 on February 14, 2023.

Station 34 Phase-2 construction plans were submitted to the City of Folsom Building Department in October 2022 and have since been approved. Formal bid requests were advertised for a construction contractor with a closing date of Mar ch 29 , 2023 , when a public bid reading was completed. D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive responsible bid for the Folsom Fire Station 34 Phase-2 construction project.

Construction work for the project is anticipated to commence in May 2023 with a projected completion date of March2024.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
Public Works staff prepared the bid package, and the project was publicly advertised on February 28, 2023. Bids were opened on March 29, 2023, with the following submissions received:

1. D.L. Falk Inc. Bidder $8,894,632

2. Diede Construction, Inc. (2nd Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder) $9,616,000

3. D G Granade, Inc. (3'd Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder) $9,739,632

4. Bobo Construction, Inc. (4ft Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder) $9,788,288

5. CWS Construction Group, Inc. (5ft Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder) s10.87s.000

6. One Workplace Construction, Inc. (6ft Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder) $10"900"000 The Estimate of Probable Cost for this project was $10,400,000. The Fire Department and the Public Works Department have found the bids to be in order and recommends that the contract be awarded to the low-bidder, D.L.Falk Construction, Inc. Staff will use the City's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
This Council action will approve the construction contract with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. and utilize the Folsom Plan Area Capital Improvement Fund for the construction of Fire Station #34Phase-Z.
2 Page 144
04/11/2023 Item No.11.

The contract with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. would be authorized for $8,894,632. Staff is also requesting a 7.25% contingency be added to the construction project in the amount of $644,861. Any construction change orders will be reviewed and negotiated by the Construction Management Team and approved by the Fire Chief. Total project costs and sources are outlined below.

Architectural Services and Design
Environmental Analysis (Helix)
Design Consulting Services (Youngdahl)
Construction Management Services
Phase-l Civil Improvements (Doug Veerkamp)
Construction (D.L. Falk Construction, Inc.)
Construction contingency
WestNet Station Alerting System
Total cost to construct
$ 390,000
$ 18,982
$ 44,680
$ 130,200
$ 882,916
$ 8,894,632
$ 644,861
$ rr9^r22
$11,125,393
The project is included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan utilizing impact fees with a total project budget of $11,860,200. The Folsom Plan Area Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 472)has sufficient funds budgeted and available.

The costs included in the contract with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. include construction of the building, landscaping, and interior furnishings (e.g., appliances, lockers, beds platforms).

Items that arc not included in the above costs include: an ambulance, fire engine, mattresses, kitchen equipment (e.g., plates, pots, pans and utensils), station alerting system, base radio, and safety gear.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has completed a Notice of Determination and a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Review.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. I 1022 - A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with D.L. Falk Construction,Inc. for the construction of Fire Station 34 Phase-2 Project FD2234
Submitted,
J
Ken Cusano, Fire Chief

04/11/2023 Item No.11.

RESOLUTION NO. IIO22

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH D.L. FALK CONSTRUCTTON,INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTTON OF FIRE STATION 34 PHASE.2 PROJECT NO. FD2234
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to construct Fire Station 34 in the Folsom Plan Area; and
WHEREAS' this project was publicly advertised on February 28,2023, and the bids were received on March 29, 2023, with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. being the lowest responsive responsible bidder, with an amount of $8,894,632; and
WHEREAS, the project budget would include the low bid amount of $8,894,632 and a 7 )5% contingency in the amount of $644,861 for a total project budget for Phase-2 Construction of $9,539,493; and
WHEREAS, funds in the amount of $9,539,493 are budgeted and available in the Folsom Plan Area Improvement Fund (Fund 472); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the construction of Fire Station 34Phase-2 ProjectNo. FD2234 for the total not-to-exceed amount of $8,894,632 with the budgeted amount to include a 7 .25Yo contingency of $644,861 for a total of $9,539,493.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this l lth day of April2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11022
Page I of I Page 146
04/11/2023 Item No.11.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort
RECOMMENDATION / COI]NCIL ACTION
The Parks and Recreation Department recommends approval of Resolution No. 11012 - A Resolution to Dually Name the Existing Green Room within the Historic Depot Building at 200 Wool Street the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room" and Recognition of Donation of Funds for Interior Improvements by the Lewis Family.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Within the historic Southern Pacific Railroad Depot Building, there is a "Green Room" that is available to rent or use upon request. Typically, the room is used in conjunction with events held at the Zittel Amphitheater. Many years ago (approximately 40 years), the room was informally named The Bud Davies Ambassador Room. There is a sign on the outside of the entrance to the room and a sign and picture on the inside of the room. See Attachment 2. As background, later in the early 1990's, a park in American River Canyon North was formally named after Bud and Artie Davies.

In mid-February of this year, the Folsom Historic District Association (FHDA), who is the City's most frequent user of Zittel Amphitheater, received a request from the Lewis Family to name the existing green room, the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room", in honor of their deceased son. See Attachment 3 for the request letter. The FHDA, is also a sublessee to Folsom Chamber 1 MEETING DATE: 4nU2023
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 l0l2 - A Resolution to Dually Name the Existing Green Room within the Historic Depot Building at200 Wool Street the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room" and Recognition of Donation of Funds for Interior Improvements by the Lewis Family
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

04/11/2023 Item No.12.
of Commerce, for this space which will be used for offrce and green room uses. In addition, FHDA will be making several tenant improvements to the space of which the letter attached from the Lewis Family intends to fund $25,000 of the renovation expenses in exchange for the naming recognition to the green room.

POLICY / RU,LE
City Council Resolution No. 1 0696-"4 Resolution to Resend and Replace Resolution No. 5 177 and Resolution No. 3951 to Create a New Park and Facility Naming Policy", was adopted on September 14, 2021 and allows for sponsorships to take place in exchange for naming recognition.

ANALYSIS
While there is no formal record of the naming of o'The Bud Davies Ambassador Room" in the city archives, such naming provides historical context and speaks to the contributions made by a notable city leader, Bud Davies. It is the desire of both the FHDA and the Lewis Family to retain the existing name and signage and merely add another sign and picture to the interior of the room to recognize the contributions of Peter T. Lewis in recent times towards the many events he participated in at the Zittel Amphitheater'
The new park and facility naming policy (Resolution No. 10696) states the following under the heading, 'osponsorships for Existing and New Parks/Xacilities":
"This policy allows for sponsorship opportunities to fund amenities within a park or facility as well as fund a portion of a park or facility. Recognition would be commensurate with said donations or funding. Such recognition could be plaques, signage, andlor other name recognition opportunities within the park or facility." In reviewing the request, staff feels the donation and the additional naming of the room as the Peter T. Lewis Green Room is commensurate with the intent of the policy. In addition, the applicant has confirmed that the dual naming of the room will be tastefully done so as to maintain the history of the existing name and the recognition of the new additional name.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to the City

AL REVIEW
This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

ATTACHMENT
2 Page 148
04/11/2023 Item No.12.

I-. Resolution No. ll0l2 - A Resolution to Dually Name the Existing Green Room within the Historic Depot Building at200 Wool Street the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room" and Recognition of Donation of Funds for Interior Improvements by the Lewis Family

2. Photographs of Existing Signage and Name to Remain

3. L.tt., to Judy Collingsworth, Executive Director of Folsom Historic District Association from Tom and Suzanne Lewis and Families, dated February 7,2023 Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks and Recreation Director
J Page 149
04/11/2023 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT I.

04/11/2023 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. IIOI2

A RESOLUTION TO DUALLY NAME THE EXISTING GREEN ROOM WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BUILDING AT 2OO WOOL STREET THE "PETER T. LEWIS GREEN ROOM" AND RECOGNITION OF DONATION OF FUNDS FOR INTERIOR

IMPROVEMENTS BY THE LEWIS FAMILY
WHEREAS, the existing Southern Pacific Railroad Depot Building is owned by the City of Folsom and leased to the Folsom Chamber of Commerce ("Lessee"); and WHEREAS, an existing room within the building is currently referred to as the "Green Room" as well as "The Bud Davies Ambassador Room"; and
WHEREAS, the Folsom Historic District Association (FHDA) is a sublessee of the existing Green Room and intends to complete tenant improvements for the Green Room and office space; and
WHEREAS' ResolutionNo. 10696, adopted on September 14,202I, created a new policy for the naming of parks and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Lewis Family is requesting that the existing Green Room be named the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room" in honor of their deceased son and will donate $25,000 toward the planned interior improvements of the Green Room and office space; and WHEREAS, the existing name and signage for "The Bud Davies Ambassador Room" will remain and additional signage will be added inside the room to dually name the room the "Peter T. Lewis Green Room"; and
WHEREAS, this naming request is consistent with the intent of the new policy that allows a Sponsor to contribute to a facility in exchange for naming recognition, and WHEREAS, the City of Folsom, the lessee, and the sublessee, are appreciative of the donation and in-agreement to add the name, "Peter T. Lewis Green Room." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom dually names the existing Green Room, "The Bud Davies Ambassador Room" and the ooPeter T.

Lewis Green Room.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this 1lth day of ApriI2023, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 11012
Page I of2
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR

04/11/2023 Item No.12.

ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11012
Page2 of2 Page 152
04/11/2023 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT 2

04/11/2023 Item No.12.
r'ilF- \'j! \'\ a
I i.Il
I
: .i,,
t -t';jj
i .i..ti':r
iirll.l-ir.Jil!i!
. liti$L
' !'tal(

04/11/2023 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT 3

04/11/2023 Item No.12.
lDu*r*& Sro,rr*,,
P.O. Box 1694, Cameron Park, CA 95682
www. p ow er ands t aging. c om
CelVText (916) 221-2224
February 7,2023
Judy Collingsworth
Executive Director
Folsom Historic District Association
Historic Folsom, CA 95762
Hello,
Over the past 20 plus years my business, Power & Staging, has enjoyed the privilege of supporting Folsom events. Events large and small from the Folsom Pro Rodeo, concerts and street festivals to simple meetings and recitals. Collaborating with City leadership, the business community, Chamber of Commerce, FHDA and countless great citizens has been an honor beyond measure.

Back in the mid -1990's while working at the Folsom Pro Rodeo, I experienced the joy of bringing my son Peter (about 10 years old at the time) to help with the production tasks which I was employed to provide' Early memories include him helping install speakers, running wires and setting off fireworks in the arena after spectators were gone with the Rosser family and other kids... Later years saw Peter working in Folsom building events, decorating city Christmas trees, supporting music festivals, rigging lights into the Zittle Amphitheater and so many other tasks.

Unfortunately, in September 2018 we lost Peter due to a tragic accident. Peter will always live in our hearts as a wonderful son, family member, and outstanding citizen of the world. To help honor Peter's memory the Lewis Family; parents Tom and Suzanne, sisters Sandie and Kim and their families would like to contribute to the events community in Folsom.
peter always appreciated working with entertainers and other professionals in the industry' Special for Peter was time in green rooms backstage visiting, collaborating, and supporting that day's event. Recognizing this connection, we are considering the contribution of Twentv-Five Thousand dollars to the pending renovation to the Green Room behind the Zittle Amphitheater in Historic Downtown Folsom. Renaming this space to the "Peter T Lewis Green Room" would honor Peter's memory as a stagehand and special person in the events community. Hopefully this naming honor would remain as long as the space remains a green room for the attached performing areas.

04/11/2023 Item No.12.

Our hope would be that with help from this contribution the room could be substantially renovated as currently envisioned in time for this year's concert series starting in June. This contribution could be publicly announced at the FHDA fundraising event scheduled in March. At the first concert in June there could be a simple recognition ceremony and installation of a plaque in the room.

Please do consider our offer of this contribution, we could fund this immediately if accepted. Untilthis is finalized and publicly announced it is appreciated that this is held confidential to the FHDA management and Board of Directors.

Again, thanks for all the support.

Regards,
Tom & Suzanne Lewis and Families