1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 July 25, 2023
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.
Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table. Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins. When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium. Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.
Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:
In Person Online On TV
City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14
More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda
2 City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, July 25, 2023 6:30 PM
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers: Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no mo re than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. Folsom Water – A Presentation Detailing the City’s Water Rights, Contracts, Supplies, and Demands for Current and Future Water Customers
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
2. Approval of June 27, 2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
3. Approval of July 11, 2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
3 4. Resolution No. 11071 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Pacific Excavation, Inc for the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, at Various Locations Throughout the City as Identified in the Local Road Safety Plan
5. Resolution No. 11077 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom
6. Resolution No. 11079 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works, Inc. for the Folsom Zoo Perimeter Fence Project and Appropriation of Funds
7. Resolution No. 11080 – A Resolution Authorizing Submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2023-24 to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments
8. Resolution No. 11081 – A Resolution Accepting the Grant Award from the Regional Active Transportation Program for the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure Project and Appropriation of Funds
9. Resolution No. 11083 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Design Consulting Services with M. Neils Engineering, Inc. for an Electric Vehicle Charging System at the Corporation Yard
PUBLIC HEARING:
10. Resolution No. 11078 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect Such Charges on the Tax Roll
11. Resolution No. 11082 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the Following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
NEW BUSINESS:
12. Consideration of Establishment of Community Priorities Advisory Committee and Direction to Staff
COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will be in recess during the first half of August.
The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 22, 2023.
NOTICE: Members of the p ublic are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item
4 that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.
NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisio ns (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.
As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.
PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 S tafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Environmental and Water Resources Director, Marcus Yasutake, will present information related to the City's water supplies. The presentation will include a discussion onthe following:
. Folsom's water supplies
o Folsom Dam and Reservoir
o Water rights and assets
o Water usage (current and future)
o Challenges
o Opportunities
o 2023 water supply outlook
o State and City actions
. City messaging and outreach
Submitted,
Plww'*
Marcus Director
ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
1 MEETING DATE: 712512023
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentatrons
SUBJECT Folsom Water - A Presentation Detailing the City's Water Rights, Contracts, Supplies, and Demands for Current and Future Water Customers
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department
07/25/2023 Item No.1.
This page intentionallY Ieft blank
to facilitqte double- sided printing .
CITY OF
FOLS(}l\{
OISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
07/25/2023 Item No.1.
Book77 Page 118
Folsom City Council
June27,2023
Gity Gouncil Special Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, June 27,2023 3:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.m. with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.
ROLL GALL:
Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember (anived at 3:33 pm) Participating Staff: City Manager Elaine Andersen
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Parks and Recreation Director Kelly Gonzalez
ADJOURNMENT CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOL NG PURPOSES:
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8: Retail Space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070-0052-023. Negotiating Parties: City Manager Elaine Andersen on behalf of the City of Folsom, and Taryn Grows and Charlie Grows, of Pour Leadership lnc., DBA Uncle Charlie's Firehouse & Brew. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Lease
2. Performance Evaluation of Public Employee Pursuant to Government Code section 54957(bX1): Position Title: City Manager
Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, to adjourn to closed session for the above referenced items. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 7 07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book77 Page 1 19
Folsom City Council
June 27,2023
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rohrbough, Rodriguez Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): Kozlowski
Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski arrived at 3:33 pm and participated in the entire closed session discussion.
RECONVENE
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking announced that no final action was taken during closed session
ADJOURNMENT
The special meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 6:32 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 8 07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book77 Page 120
Folsom City Council
June 27,2023
Gity Council Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, June 27,2023 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at6:32 pm with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Present Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent:
Participating Staff:
None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Landscaping and Lighting Manager Zach Perras
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
AGENDA UPDATE
None
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
None
SGHEDULED PRESENTATIONS :
1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming July as "Parks Make Life Betted' Month
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 9 07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book 77 Page 121
Folsom City Council
June 27 ,2023
Councilmember Sarah Aquino presented the proclamation to Folsom Lifeguards Connor, Avery, and Lexi Schoonmaker.
2. Presentation from Hope Cooperative Regarding Homeless Services in Folsom CEO of Hope Cooperative Erin Johansen and Director of Program Services Alexander Sopp made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
3. Folsom Tourism and Economic Development Corporation (TEDCorp) Quarterly Report CEO of Choose Folsom Joe Gagliardi introduced Sally Buchanan and Laura Fickle who made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
CONSENT GALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
4. Approval of May 23,2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
5. Resolution No. 11054 - A Resolution Authorizing Public Fireworks Displays During the Annual Folsom Pro Rodeo Activities
6. Resolution No. 1 1055 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Loan Purchase Agreement Amendment with USA Properties Fund lnc.
7 . Resolution No. 1 1057 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Central Valley Engineering and Asphalt, lnc. for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Rehabilitation Fiscal Year 2022-23 Prolect PW8017 and Appropriation of Funds
8. pulled for comment
L Resolution No. 11059 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No.2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflections ll, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
10. Resolution No. 1 1060 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Certification Form for the Folsom Fire Department to Participate in a Medi-Cal Intergovernmental Transfer (lGT) Program with the California Department of Health Services (DHCS) for Reimbursement of PP-GEMT IGT Services for the Service Period of January 1, 2023, Through December 31 , 2023 and Make Transfers Not to Exceed $300,738
DMFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 10 07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book77 Page 122
Folsom City Council
June 27,2023
1 1 . Resolution No. 1 1061 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Midstate Barrier, lnc. for the Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street Safety lmprovements Project
12. Receive Annual Report Regarding Police Use of Military Type Equipment and Approve Resolution No. 11063 - A Resolution Renewing Ordinance No. 1326 and Determining that Specified "Military Equipment" Used by the Folsom Police Department has Complied with Standards for Approval Set Forth in State Law
Motion by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve items 4-7 and9-12 of the Consent Galendar.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION:
8. Resolution No. 11058 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Loggers Unlimited lnc. for Shaded Fuel Break Creation and Ladder Fuel Removal Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla asked for clarification regarding the bidding process. Landscaping and Lighting Manager Zach Perras responded.
Motion by Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, to approve Resolution No. 11058.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rohrbough, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
NEW BUSINESS:
13. Consideration of Economic Development Consultant (Scope of Work and Goals) and Direction to Staff
City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council regarding the scope of work for a consultant. City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council regarding the scope of work for a consultant. The City Council directed the City Manager to move forward with a request for proposal process to obtain an economic development consultant.
DMFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 11 07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book77 Page 123
Folsom City Council
June 27, 2023
COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Elaine Andersen announced the following: groundbreaking of Prospector Park and Fire Station 34 in Folsom Ranch, road closures due to a sink hole on Folsom Boulevard, National Night Out on August 1, traffic safety improvement project at Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma Street and the community emergency response team (CERT) academy course. She wished happy birthday to Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla.
COUNCIL GOMMENTS:
Councilmember Anna Rohrbough thanked City Manager Elaine Andersen for meeting with her to discuss their communication. She thanked Officer Mike Gruenberg and the Folsom Police Association for attending the last City Council meeting regarding Police Department efforts with homelessness. She commented regarding the Folsom Hometown Parade and that her son graduated from college and is starting a job.
Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla wished himself a happy birthday. He commended the Historic District on a successful Hometown Parade and spoke about the Rodeo, Juneteenth and attending the Folsom High School Career Technical Education program ceremony.
Councilmember Sarah Aquino shared about visiting Alaska and their walking signs and split trails which might be something to consider in Folsom. She asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of former Councilmember Lindsey Goodell.
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski spoke of attending the Blueprint Presentation and commented regarding the overlay pavement on East Natoma, the shuttle program in Historic District, a traffic circle in Esparto and the rodeo.
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez commented regarding summer concerts, Heart of Folsom art pieces, an update to the River District Ad Hoc resolution and the rodeo mutton busting.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Rosario Rodriguez adjourned the meeting in memory of Lindsey Goodell at 8:33 pm.
SUBMITTED BY
ATTEST:
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
07/25/2023 Item No.2.
Book 77 Page 125
Folsom Gity Council
July 11 ,2023
City Gouncil Special Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, July 11,2023 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.
ROLL GALL:
Councilmembers Present Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmem bers Absent: Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember (arrived at 5:06 pm)
Participating Staff: City Manager Elaine Andersen
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Parks and Recreation Director Kelly Gonzalez
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:
1. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: Human Resources Advisor John Spittler. Employee Organization: Folsom Police M anagement Association
2. Performance Evaluation of Public Employee Pursuant to Government Code section 54957(bX1): Position Title: City Manager
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, to adjourn to closed session for the above referenced items. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski arrived at 5:06 pm and participated in the entire closed session discussion.
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 13 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book 77 Page 126
Folsom City Council
July 11,2023
RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session
ADJOURNMENT
The special meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 6:36 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DMFT - Not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 14 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book77 Page 127
Folsom City Council
July 11 ,2023
Gity Gouncil Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, July 11,2023 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:36 pm with Mayor Rosario Rodriguez presiding.
ROLL GALL:
Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Vice Mayor
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent:
Participating Staff:
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steven Wang
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
Library Director Thomas Gruneisen
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited
City Manager Elaine Andersen read a statement from Councilmember Anna Rohrbough regarding her absence.
AGENDA UPDATE
None
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
The following speaker addressed the City Council
1. Anita Bogdanoff regarding cardrooms
DMFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 15 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book 77 Page 128
Folsom City Council
July 11,2023
SGHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming July 16-22,2023 as National Zookeeper Week in the City of Folsom
Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla presented the proclamation to zoo staff Amy Van der Molen, Rocky Marshall, Helen Chu, Nichole Lemcke and Jocelyn Smeltzer' GONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
2. Approval of June 8,2023 Special Joint City Council / FCUSD / Rancho Cordova City Council Meeting Minutes
3. Approval of June 13,2023 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Appointment of At-Large Member to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to Represent the Briggs Ranch District
5. Resolution No. 1 1053 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with NTU Technologies, lnc. for the Purchase of Chemicals for the Water Treatment Plant
6. Resolution No. 11062-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept a Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program offered by the California Highway Patrol in the Amount of $92,772.60 to Reduce and Mitigate the lmpacts of lmpaired Driving and Appropriation of Funds 7 . Resolution No. 1 1064 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for the Design of the Water Treatment Plant Caustic Soda System Project
8. Resolution No. 1 1065 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Crafco, lnc. for the Purchase of a Crack Sealing Machine g. Resolution No. 1 1066 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Altec lndustries, lnc. for the Purchase of a Boom Truck
10. Resolution No. 11067 -A Resolution Authoring the City Managerto Execute an Agreementwith TYMCO, lnc. for the Purchase of a Street Sweeper
1 1. Resolution No. 1 1068 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Special Facilities and As-Available Distribution Service Agreement with Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Appropriation of Funds
12. Resolution No. 11070 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consultant and Professional Services Agreement with Unico Engineering for Construction lnspection and Materials Testing for the Blue Ravine Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project and Appropriation of Funds
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 16 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book77 Page 129
Folsom City Council
July 11 ,2023
13. Resolution No. 11072 -A Resolution Electing the Population and lnflation Factors and Establishing the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Appropriations Limit
14. Resolution No. 11073 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Economic & Planning Systems, lnc. for Professional Consultant Services to Update the Developmental Nexus and lmpact Fee Study for Public Facilities in the Folsom Plan Area
15. Resolution No. 11074 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement with Pour Leadership lnc., dba Uncle Charlie's Firehouse & Brew
16. Resolution No. 11075 -A Resolution Authorizing the City Managerto Execute an Agreement with Advanced Chemical Transport, lnc. for Hazardous Waste Management Services and Appropriation of Funds
17. Resolution No. 11076 - A Resolution Adding a Stakeholder Representative to the River District Master Plan Citizens Advisory Committee
Motion by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, to approve the Gonsent Galendar.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
NEW BUSINESS:
18. Resolution No. 1 1 069 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 10479 to Revise the Master Fee Schedule for Library Services to Remove Fines and Adjust the Fee for Selected Library Services as of 711112023
Library Director Thomas Gruneisen made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
The following speakers addressed the City Council:
1. Rupin Jonnalagadda
2. YiiaV Jonnalagadda
Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, to approve Resolution No. 11069.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez Gouncilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): Rohrbough
Gouncilmember(s): None
Gouncilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez Councilmember(s): None
Councilmember(s): Rohrbough
Gouncilmember(s): None
DRAFT - Not of/icial until approved by City Council Page 17 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book77 Page 130
Folsom City Council
July 11 ,2023
19. Consideration of Execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with Folsom Cordova Unified School District and the City of Rancho Cordova to Share the Cost of a Folsom Cordova Unified School District Reorganization Feasibility Study and Direction to Staff City Manager Elaine Andersen made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
The City Councilmembers each commented and discussed the item.
The following speaker addressed the City Council:
1. Colleen Shannon
Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor YK Ghalamcherla, to pay a third of the School District's consultant cost for a feasibility study.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s): Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez
Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski
Gouncilmember(s): Rohrbough
Gouncilmember(s): None
COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Elaine Andersen announced the following: Assemblyman Josh Hoover secured funding for the Johnny Cash art piece in Folsom, groundbreaking of Prospector Park and Fire Station 34 in Folsom Ranch, passing of police canine Reno, free summer concerts and the City's Green Bin Program first anniversary.
COUNCIL GOMMENTS:
Councilmember Aquino commended the Parks and Recreation Department for pursuing funds for the Johnny Cash art and the Folsom Ranch groundbreakings. She asked that this meeting be adjourned in memory of Keoni Hubbard and John Snook in addition to police canine Reno.
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski commented regarding school starting back.
Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla thanked Colleen Shannon for speaking at the meeting. He commented regarding attending the eagle scout court of honor for Kristijan Lezaic and encouraged residents to apply for vacant seats on the Landscaping Lighting Committee. He spoke of the grand opening of Poppy Bank and thanked everyone involved in a successful rodeo.
DRAFT - Not official until approved by City Council Page 18 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
Book77 Page 131
Folsom City Council
July 11 ,2023
Mayor Rosario Rodriguez commented regarding the rodeo, summer concerts, Assemblyman Josh Hoover funds for the art piece and National Night Out. She wished a happy birthday to City Manager Elaine Andersen.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Rosario Rodriguez adjourned the meeting in memory of John Snook, police canine Reno, Keoni Hubbard and Kirsten Davis at 7:33 pm.
SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Rosario Rodriguez, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approved by City Council Page 19 07/25/2023 Item No.3.
This poge intentionally left blonk
to focilitate double- sided printing .
CITY OF
F OLSOl\f
DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
07/25/2023 Item No.3.
h
Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 1 1 071 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Pacific Excavation,Inc for the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, at Various Locations Throughout the City as Identified in the Local Road Safety Plan.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Public Works Department is responsible for the operation, safety, and maintenance of roadways throughout Folsom. In June 2021, aLocalRoad Safety Plan (LRSP) was developed, which is a data-driven report that systematically identifies and analyzes roadway safety issues and recommends improvements. The LRSP utilized accident data between 2015 and2019 to determine locations and causes of traffic accidents, allowing engineers to implement specific countermeasures to address the causes of accidents, leading to a safer roadway network for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.
The LRSP identified thirteen (13) specific signalized intersections to upgrade signal hardware and to update signal timing, amap of these locations is attached as Appendix A. Utilizing the data and recommendations from the LRSP, the city was successful in receiving Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds for those improvements. 1 MEETING DATE: 712512023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: ResolutionNo. 11071 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Pacific Excavation, Inc for the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, at Various Locations Throughout the City as Identified in the Local Road Safety Plan
F'ROM: Public Works Department
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
In February 2022,the crty contracted with Kimley Horn and Associates to perform the project design and produce the plans, specifications, and estimate. The project components consist of the lnstallation of Accessible Pedestrian Systems (APS), High Visibility signal head backplates, advanced dilemma zone detections, replacement of 8" signal heads wrthl2" signal heads and updating of signal timing and phasing.
The project is expected to begin in August 2023 and be completed by September 2023.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by Ctty Council.
ANALYSIS
Public Works staff prepared the bid package and publicly advertised the project onMay 25, 2023. Bids were received on June 22,2023.
The four bids received are as follows:
o PacificExcavation,Inc.
o Bear Electrical Solutions
o M&M Electric
o St. Francis Electric LLC
$1,280,683.00
$1,336,500.00
$1,869,000.00
$1,894,000.00
The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $1,320,770. The Public Works Department has found the bids to be in order and recommends that the contract be awarded to the low-bidder, Pacific Excavation, Inc. Staff will use the city's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City was awarded State HSIP funds inthe amount of $1,584,600 for this project. The city's match is reimbursed as a percentage of 50o/o or $792,300. The design contract with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. was approved in the amount of $95,365, with $1,489,235 remaining in the project budget for construction.
The contract with Pacific Excavation, Inc. would be authorized for $1,280,683 with a total project budget of $1,408,751, which includes a ten percent contingency amount of $128,068. for potential change orders.
Funds in the amount of $1,408,751 are budgeted and available in the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, utilizing the Transportation Improvement Fund 2 Page 22
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
(Fund 446) for Fiscal Year2023-24. Reimbursements received through Caltrans invoicing will be credited to the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446).
The construction agreement includes non-participation cost work in the amount of $102,519, which is not eligible for reimbursement. This work includes installing video detection equipment at intersections included in the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project 8017 for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The scope of this portion of work was added to this contract due to the cost savings for similar nature of work and better pricing for materials required. The non-participation costs will be fimded from the Street Overlay/Pavement Management Project, Project 8017 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 utilizing Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund aa6).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project has been deemed Categorically Exempt from Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review based on Class 1: Existing Facilities.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11071 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Pacific Excavation, Inc. for the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, at Various Locations Throughout the City as Identified in the Local Road Safety Plan
2. Exhibit A - Project Map
3. Notice of Exemption, California Environmental Quality Act Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
aJ Page 23
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Attachment 1
Resolution No. LI07l
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
RESOLUTION NO. IIOTI
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC EXCAVATION, INC.O FOR THE HIGHWAY SAF'ETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS, PROJECT PW2202, AT
VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS IDENTIF'IED IN THE LOCAL ROAD SAF'ETY PLAI\
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department desires to install traffic safety improvements to thirteen intersections throughout the City of Folsom; and WHEREAS, this project consists of engineering countermeasures identified by the Local Road Safety Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City was successful in receiving Highway Safety Improvement Program funds for these improvements; and
WHEREAS, Public Works staff prepared the bid package, publicly advertised the project, and received bids on June 22,2023,with Pacific Excavation, Inc., being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, funds in the amount of $ 1 ,408,75 I are budgeted and available in the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, utilizing the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446) for Fiscal Year 2023-24; and
WHEREAS, reimbursements received through Caltrans invoicing will be credited to the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attomey:
NOW, THEREF"ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Construction Agreement with Pacific Excavation, Inc., for the Highway Safety Improvements Projects, Project PW2202, at various locations throughout the city as identified in the Local Road Safety Plan, in the amount of $1,280,683, with a total not- to-exceed project budget of $1,408,751, which includes a ten percent contingency amount of $128,068.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25tr day of July 2023,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
ATTEST:
Resolution No. I l07l
Page I of2
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 11071
Page2 of2 Page 26
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Attachmerfi.2
ExhibitA-ProjectMap
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
HSIP Cycle 10 Traffic Signal
Safety lmprovement Project
I ntersection Locations
L. Folsom-Auburn Road & Folsom Lake Crossing
2. Folsom-Auburn Road & Oak Ave Pkwy
3. Folsom Blvd & Natoma Station Drive
4. Blue Ravine & Natoma Station Drive
5. lron Point Road & Willard Drive
6. East Bidwell Street & Glenn Drive
7. East Bidwell Street & Blue Ravine Drive
8. East BidwellStreet & Creekside Drive
9. East BidwellStreet & Oak Ave Pkwy
L0. East BidwellStreet & Broadstone Pkwy
LL. Blue Ravine Rd & Flower Drive
L2. E Natoma St & Prison Road
13. E Natoma St & Blue Ravine Road
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Attachment 3
Notice of Exemption
Califo rnia Environmental Quality Act
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Print Form
'f2023 -0093
Notice of Exemption
lilililililillilililililliltll]t
23869993
Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044, Room 113
Sacramento, CA 9581 2-3044
County Clerk
From: (Public Agency)
50 Natoma St
City of Folsom
Folsom, CA 95630
County of; Sacramento (Address)
600 Eth Str@t
Sacramento, CA 95824
Project Title: HSIP Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project
Proiect Applicant: City of Folsom
Project Location - Specific:
Signal lmprovements at 13 intersections (see Project Description) Project Location - City: Folsom Project Location - County: Sacramento Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project SACR]qMENTO COUNTY
FIB ? 4 ?.023
gia*gi Sh.f st g-r'd"iono P.d(w.y: g) Esd Btdwoll SEt and GtFn Orivn;9) Fol6m Aubum R@d at Ook Avonuo Pa*myi l0) Folsm Aubutn Road ot Fol&m llks C@sin!; 11) EBit Nabme AtEd|mont A),
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Folsom Name ol Person or Agency Carrying Out Projecl City of Folsom Exempt Status: (check one):
tr Ministerial (Sec. 21080(bX1); 15268);
tr Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(bX3); 15269(a));
tr Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
E Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Section (S) 15301 tr Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reasons why project is exempt:
The proposed pro;ect is consistent with State CEQA Exemptions Class 1 - Existing Facilities 15301 , in accordance with Cal. Code Regs., til. 14, S 15300 et seq. The proposed project would reduce collisions and improve safety by installing cost effective signal improvements to improve pedestrian and vehicle and reduce conflicts. Safety would be improved with with new signal hardware such as video detection radar, replacement of signal heads, and flashing beacons to provide advance warning to motorists, (See attachment A).
Lead Agency
Contact Person: Zach Bosch Area Codeffelephone/Extension: 916-461-6710 ll filed by appllcant:
1. Atlach certified document of exemption tinding,
2. Has a filed by the public agency approving the proiect? . Yes No Signature: Darc.02123123 rile: Senior Civil Engineer
ned by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority oited: Sections 21083 and 21 1.10, Public Resources Code' Reference: Sections 21108,21152, and21152,1, Public Resources Code FOJ|ID lv co.
Date Received lor filing at OPR
Revised 2011
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
Attachment A -
CEQA Exemption Information X'orm
City of Folsom Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10)
Project tocation
The City of Folsom Highway Safety lmprovement Project (HSIP) (proposed project) is located in the City of Folsom (City) at 13 intersections (project sites). The projects proposed improvements would occur within the following intersections: 1) Folsom Boulevard at Natoma Station Drive; 2) Blue Ravine Road at Flower Drive; 3) Blue Ravine Road at Natoma Station;4) Blue Ravine Road at East BidwellStreet; 5) East Bidwell Street at Oak Avenue Parkway ; 5) East Bidwell at Broadstone Parkway 7) East Bidwell Street at Broadstone Parkway; 8) East Bidwell Street and Glenn Drive; 9) Folsom Auburn Road at Oak Avenue Parkway; 10) Folsom Auburn Road at Folsom Lake Crossing; 11) East Natoma Street at Prison Road; 12) East Natoma Street at Green Valley Road; and 13) lron Point Road at Willard Drive' The project sites have been improved with existing roadways, sidewalks, and infrastructure, and have been completely modified from the native environment. No work would occur in or directly disturb any natural habitats. The project sites are surrounded by urbanized land uses including residential, commercial, public facllities, recreational areas (trails) and transportation routes.
Proposed lmprovements/Description
The purpose of the project is consistent with the City's efforts to improve both vehicle and pedestrian safety at the thirteen signalized intersections listed above. The proposed project would enhance the multi- modal transportation network. The proposed treatments at each of these locations are anticipated to improve intersection safety and increase signal visibility for drivers, The project would modify traffic control signal timing, updated signal timing technology, video detection systems, upgraded intersection striping and markings, accessible pedestrian signals (APS), countdown pedestrian signals, upgraded signal heads, and retroreflective borders on signal backplates, The improvements are based on an analysis of city-wide crash data that included intersections that were not previously funded for improvements.
Additionally, the installation of upgraded video detection will provide dilemma zone detection capabilities and includes hi-resolution data collection for automated traffic signaling performance. The described minor improvements would minimize pedestrianlvehicle conflicts. As discussed, improvements are based on evaluation of the existing roadway and intersection configurations and reviewed safety data.
The proposed project does not include any roadway improvements such as additional lanes or alignment changes. The proposed improvements would not require removals of existing hardscape or soil removal as all improvements would occur above ground. Accordingly, no underground utility relocations would be needed.
Specific improvements at the intersection are provided immediately below.
HSIP Cycle l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Project -
City of Folsom
Notice of Exemption - Attachment A
January 2023A-l
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
L. lntersection of Folsom Boulevard and Natoma Station Drive - lmprovements include installation retroflected borders on signal head plates, replacement of signal hardware {signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), and vehicle detection upgrades.
2. lntersection of Blue Ravine Road and Flower Drive - lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), vehicle detection upgrades, and new or replaced cross walk striping and markings.
3. Blue Ravine Road and Natoma Station Drive - lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), and vehicle detection upgrades.
4. lntersection of Blue Ravine Road and East Bidwell Street * lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, vehicle detection upgrades, and new or replaced cross walk striping and markings.
5. lntersection of East Bidwell Street and Oak Avenue Parkwav - lmprovements include replacement of 8-inch signal heads with 12-inch heads, installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, and replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS).
6. lntersection of East Bidwell Street and Broadstone Parkwav - lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, and replacement of signal hardware (signal, heads countdown ped heads, and APS).
7. lntersection of East Bidwell Street and Glenn Drive - lmprovements include installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal, heads countdown ped heads, and APS), vehicle detection upgrades, and signal timing improvements.
8. lntersection of East Bidwell Street and Creekside Drlve- lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, and vehicle detection upgrades.
9. lntersection of Folsom-Auburn Road and Folsom Lake Crossine- lmprovements include replacement of 8-inch signal heads with 12-inch heads, installation of additional and supplemental signal headt retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal, heads countdown ped heads, and APS), vehicle detection upgrades, and new or replaced crosswalk striping and markings.
L0. lntersection of Folsom-Auburn Road and Folsom Lake Crossing - lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), and vehicle detection upgrades.
HSIP Cycle l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Project -
City of Folsom
Notice of Exemption - Attachment A
January 2023A-2
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
1.1. lntersectiol of East Natoma Street and Folsom Prison Road - lmprovements include installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), vehicle detection upgrades, and new or replaced crosswalk striping and markings.
12. lntersection of East Natoma Street and Blue Ravine and Green Vallev Road - lmprovements include installation of additional and supplemental signal heads, retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), and vehicle detection upgrades.
13. lntersection of lron Point Road and Willard Drive - lmprovements include installation of retroreflective borders on signal head backplates, replacement of signal hardware (signal heads, countdown ped heads, and APS), and vehicle detection upgrades.
Project Site Access
Primary access to the project site is via the existing listed roadways and minor access via adjacent sidewalks would be needed to install the accessible pedestrian signals (APS).
Land Uses
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing roadways and sidewalks with existing signalization and traffic control devices. No improvements would occur within previously undisturbed areas or sites with native vegetation. The City of Folsom General Plan land use map shows the project areas as existing roadway corridors. Surrounding and adjacent land uses include SFHD - (Single Family High Density), SF - (Single Family), MLD - (Multi Family Low Density), MMD - (Multi Family Medium Density), MHD - (Multi Family High Density), GC - (General Commercial), CC - (Community Commercial), RCC - (Regional Commercial Center), PQP - (Public and Quasi-Public Facility), P - (Parks), and OS - (Open Space).
Reasons Why Proiect is ExemPt
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1).
Section 15301. Class 1, is a categorical exemption and as it pertains to the proposed project and consists of maintenance, permitting, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. ln regard to the proposed project, subsection c) would be directly applicable as it states as follows:
c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety), and other alterations such as the addition of bicycle facilities, including but not limited to bicycle parking, bicycle-share facilities and bicycle lanes, transit improvements such as bus lanes, pedestrian crossings, street trees, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes); The proposed project would be permitted by the City for the minor improvements. lssuance of the permit(s) would be consistent with all applicable land use policy and guidance documents including the City Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. The proposed project would occur entirely within existing HSIP Cycle l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Project -
City of Folsom
of Exemption - Attachment A
A-3
Notice
Ianuary 2023
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
disturbed and improved areas within the existing roadways and right-of-way. The proposed project consists of improvements to enhance vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle safety and is consistent with this exemption.
Exceptions to Exemptions
The proposed project does not meet any of the exceptions to use of an exemption listed in CEQA Section 15300.2 per the following:
Location. Classes 3, 4,5,6, and LL are qualified by consideration of where the proposed project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may be in a particularly sensitive environment be significant, Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.
a) The proposed project does not occur within a hazardous waste site. Review of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker tool and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor Database revealed no evidence of hazardous materials sites on the project site. ln addition, none of the project sites are on the DTSC as CORTESE List. The proposed project would not use, handle, store, or dispose of substantial volumes of any acutely hazardous materials. All construction activities that would require the handling of potentially hazardous materials (i.e. fuels, solvents, paints, lubricants, etc), are commonly used for these types of work efforts and would be in conformance with all applicable regulations. The nearest sites listed in the SWRCB and DTSC databases to the project intersections include:
r Chevron (Concophillips) Station #26LLL7A - tO24 East Bidwell Street - This site is approximately 100-feet northeast of the Blue Ravine and East BidwellStreet intersection and would not be affected by or have an affect the proposed project. This record listed a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) (dieselfuel)The case was closed/completed in 2009. This site has a current permitted underground storage tank that would not affect the proposed project.
r Chevron Station #209216 - !024 East Bidwell Street - This site is approximately 485-feet northeast of the Glenn Drive East Bidwell Street lntersection. This site has a permitted underground storage tank that would not affect the proposed project. r Bank of America - 521 East Bidwell Street - This site is approximately 50 feet from the intersection of E. Bidwell Street and Glenn Drive. Dry cleaning solvents were detected in groundwater samples in 1994 from a former gas station that was upgradient. This site was listed as a gasoline LUST cleanup site and has been closed/completed as of 1996. This site would not affect the proposed project'
o Folsom Dam Market - 7620 Folsom Auburn Road - This site has a permitted underground storage tank at, approximately 180-feet northeast of the intersection of Folsom-Auburn Road and Folsom Lake Crossing. This site would not affect the proposed project, o Aisle 7#2450 - 25045 Blue Ravine Road -This site has a permitted underground storage tank approximately 350-feet northeast of the intersection of East Natoma Street and Blue Ravine and Green Valley Road. This site would not affect the proposed project.
HSIP Cycle l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Project -
City of Folsom
Notice of Exemption - Attachment A
Ianuary 2023A-4
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
As discussed above, the project site and its vicinity were evaluated for the presence of hazardous materials, the potential presence of hazardous materials in soil underlying areas, and for permitted underground storage tanks. No presence of hazardous materials was found at the intersections of the project site. Additionally, the project would not result in any removals of hardscape or underling soils that have the potential to result in upset.
b) Cumulative lmpact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. r The proposed project would not have an impact on surrounding areas, adjoining sites, or combine with other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable project to result in a cumulative impact over time. No additional lanes or increased vehicle trips would occur. The proposed project consists of intersection pedestrian and traffic safety improvements and is consistent with the existing planning efforts of the City to improve safety of intersections with pedestrian/bicycle corridors and associated roadways. The proposed project would not result in any impacts to the environment and would not make a cumulative contribution to any environmental impact,
c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
e The proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed project would occur within areas with existing hardscape including roadways and adjacent pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and minor areas with decorative non-native ground level landscaping (i.e. grass) abutting sidewalks. The project site does not contain any sensitive habitat for federal or state listed species, and would not affect any h istoric, cu ltural, or triba I cultural resources. There are no unusual circumstances related to the project sites or surrounding areas that would result in the potential for impacts. d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.
o The proposed project would occur within an roadways, adjacent pedestrian and bicycle facilities and areas with decorative non-native ground level landscaping (i.e. grass), There are no scenic highways within any of the project site or adjacent to the project site. The nearest state scenic highway is Route 49, approximately 17 miles northwest of the city. The proposed area of disturbance does not contain any trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources and there is no potential for significant impacts to occur. e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, r See response to (a) above.
HSIP Cycle l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Project -
City of Folsom
Notice of Exemption - Attachment A
January2023A-5
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. r No Historical resources would be affected. The proposed project includes removals and improvements to existing hardscape that overlay previously disturbed areas that have been filled and compacted as part of previous construction activities. The proposed project would not result in excavations that would result in disturbance of historical or archeological resources.
Conclusion
The proposed project is consistent with State CEQA Exemptions Class 1 - Existing Facilities in accordance with Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, S 15300 et seq. No exceptions to either Exemption detailed in 515300.2 would be applicable.
HSIP Cyclc l0 Traffic Signal Improvements Projeot -
City of Folsom
Notice of Exemption - Attachment A
January 2023A-6
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
State of California - Department of Fish and Wildlife
2023 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEE
CASH RECEIPT
DFW 753.5a (REV.01/0'1/23) Previously DFG 753.5a
ON REVERSE. TYPE ORPRNT
Clty of Folsom
COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILI NG
PROJECT TITLE
HSIP Cycle 10 Traffic Safety Project
PROJECTAPPLICANT NAME
City of Folsom
PROJECT ADORESS
. 50 Natoma Street
PROJECT APPLIGANT (Qheck appropriate box)
[l Local Public Agency E School District
RECEIPT NUMBER:
34- 02124n023 -080
CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER
0212412023
NUMBER
2023-0093
NUMBER
(gte ) aor-ozro
CODE
I other Special Dishict ! state Agency E Private Entity Prlnt
nffi
SEE
LEADAGENCY EMAIL
PROJECT APPLICANT EMAIL
STATE
CA
CITY
Folsom
CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
! Environmental lmpact Report (ElR)
E Mitigated/Negative Declaratlon (MNDXND)
E Cedified Regulatory Program (CRP) document - payment due direclly to CDFW $3,839.25
$2,764.00
$1,305,25
TOTALRECEIVED $
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
50.00 50.00
$
$
$
E Exempt from fee
E Notice of Exemption (attach)
E CDFW No Effect Determination (attach)
fl Fee previously paid (attach previously issued cash receipt copy) E Water Right Application or Petition Fee (State Water Rosources Control Board only) $850.00 @ County documentary handling fee
fl ottre,
PAYMENT METHOD:
D Casn E Credit D Check E other
OF FILING PRINTED NAME AND TITLE
Sacra mento Cou nty Clerk/Recorder-Jessica Jensen- Clerk $
$
$
x
ORIGINAL - PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-COFWASB COPY - LEAD AGENCY COPY - COUNTY CLERK OFW 753.5a (R€v, 01/01/2023)
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
This page intenti.onally left blonk
to focilitote double- sided printing .
CITY OF
FOLSOnfl
DISTINCTIVE BY NAYURE
07/25/2023 Item No.4.
t.'1.:i ili.;'rrr,'l
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 7t2s12023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11077 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 l8-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11077 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City has been working with San Juan Water District (SJWD) pertaining to federal water- related advocacy services. Our agencies continue to work together as direct diverters from Folsom Dam and Reservoir on federal legislative advocacy related to funding and water supply. As direct diverters from Folsom Dam and Reservoir, our agencies share many common federal legislative advocacy interests that can impact federal funding and local water supplies.
In November 201 8, the City of Folsom entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with San Juan Water District to engage The Ferguson Group (TFG) to continue lobbying efforts on behalf of the two partner agencies for a not to exceed fee of $30,000. In August 2020, the City executed Amendment No. 3 to the MOA, bringing the total contract amount to $36,000. The terms of the MOA have expired; however legislative advocacy is still necessary to address unforeseen Federal issues related to the Delta Plan, proposed Central Valley Project (CVP) re- I
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
operational plans, and policy renewal processes with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Municipal and Industrial allocations. All these issues may impact the operations and water system allocations at Folsom Dam and Reservoir.
In May 2016, the partner agencies began a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for federal lobbying services for Fiscal Year 2017 through 2019. Three proposals were received and reviewed. Through the RFP process, the Water Purveyors selected The Ferguson Group, LLC as the most qualified and experienced federal lobbying group to perform these services. The Ferguson Groups remains the most qualified and experienced federal lobbying group to represent the City's federal water related interests. Amendment No. 6 to the MOA will allow the partner agencies to continue to share financial and staff resources in Fiscal Year 2023'24 for federal advocacy water issues important to Folsom and San Juan Water District.
POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of theFolsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.
ANALYSIS
During the past decade, City Council and staff have been continually involved in working with Federal elected officials and agencies on a number of issues of significant importance to the cities of Folsom and Roseville and the region. The Ferguson Group (TFG) has been under contract since 2002 with SJWD and the City of Folsom to represent issues related to water reliability projects at the Folsom Reservoir. This effort has been very successful in having our concerns heard at the Federal level. This amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement will provide water-related federal advocacy services through Fiscal Year 2022-23.
In January 20l6,the City of Folsom and San Juan Water District began a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for federal lobbying services for Fiscal Year 2017. The RFP allowed the agencies to continue to share financial and staffresources for federal advocacy issues important to Folsom and its partners. As agencies who share a common interest in water supply from Folsom Reservoir, federal advocacy remains a critical component to having the City's issues related to water supply reliability heard at the federal level. Through the RFP process, the partner agencies selected The Ferguson Group, LLC as the most qualified and experienced federal lobbying group to perform these services.
The Ferguson Group interacts regularly with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and a myriad of other federal departments, bureaus, and agencies on behalf of the City
-
both in Washington, D.C. and locally. The Ferguson Group's strong relationships with key officials and staff members in these agencies are critical to the success of the Crty's federal lobbying program.
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement 2 Page 40
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
(Contract No. 174-21 I 3-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom.
FINAIICIAL IMPACT
The City's cost share for continuing support of the lobbying effort is for an amount not to exceed $36,000 for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Funding for this work is budgeted and available in the FY 2023-24 Water Operating Fund (Fund 520). AmendmentNo. 6 to the MOA will cover the City's share of services through June 30, 2024.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines $15061(b)(3). The Ferguson Group's contract work scope does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11077 - A Resolution Authorinng the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom
2. Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director
ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
aJ Page 41
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
ATTACHMENT 1
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
RESOLUTION NO. IIO77
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO.6 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (CONTRACT NO. 174-2113-037) REGARDING SHARTNG OF COSTS FOR LEGTSLATM ADVOCACY SERVICES N-NTWBEN SAi\ JUAN WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FOLSOM WHEREAS, the City has been working with San Juan Water District pertaining to federal water-related advocacy services; and
WHEREAS, San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom selected The Ferguson Group, LLC as the most qualified and experienced federal lobbying grolP thrgug! a competitive seleciion process and remain the most qualified and experienced with City related federal water issues; and
WHEREAS, Federal legislative advocacy services are still important and needed to address federal water issues; and
WHEREAS, the agreement with San Juan Water District will be for a not to exceed fee of $36,000; and
WHEREAS' the funds have been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2023-24 and funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520); and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandum of Agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizes the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 6 to the Memorandqn of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-037) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25ft day of July 2023,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11077
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
MOA-Amendment #6
AMENDMENT NO.6 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
REGARDING SHARING OF COSTS FOR LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES
BETWEEN THE SAN JUAN WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FOLSOM This is the sixth Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services ("MOA") that is made between the San Juan Water District ("Districf') and the City of Folsom ("Party") as of July 1,2023. The District and the City of Folsom are hereinafter collectively referred to as the ooParties."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the MOA dated Sepember I,2018, for the cost sharing of federal legislative advocacy services, by The Ferguson Group.
WHEREAS' this amendment will extend the amended MOA to and through June 30, 2024, at the not to exceed expenditure of $72,000 (inclusive of regular business expenses).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Section 3 of the MOA is amended to read that it "shall remain in fullforce and effect through June 30, 2024,'instead of June 30,2019, while retaining all other language in the Section.
2. The previously amended Section 4 of the MOA is amended again, retaining all language except the following, to read:
4. Ceiling Price: In no event shall the total cost of lobbying and support services procured pursuant to this MOA over the fiscal year beginning July 1,2023 and ending June 30, 2024, exceed seventy-two thousand dollars to be paid by the Parties...."
3. All other terms and conditions in the MOA shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.
4. The signatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties execute this Amendment, effective as of July 1,2023.
Page I of2
Sixth Amendment to MOA
SJWD and City of Folsom - TFG Advocacy
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
SAN JUAN WATER DISTRICT
A Community Services District
BY
Paul Helliker, General Manager
SixthAmendmentto MOA
SJWD and City of Folsom - TFG Advocacy
MOA-Amendment #6
CITY OF F'OLSOM
a Municipal Corporation
BY:
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
Funding Available:
BY:
Stacey Tamagnin Finance Director
ORIGINAL APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
BY:
Marcus Yasutake, Environmental &
Water Resources Director
ORIGINAL APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Steven Wang, City Attorney
ATTEST:
BY:
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
Page2 of2
07/25/2023 Item No.5.
Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort
MEETING DATE: 712512023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1079 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works, Inc. for the Folsom ZooPerimeter Fence Project And Appropriation of Funds
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Parks and Recreation Department recommend that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 1 1079- A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works, Inc. for the Folsom Zoo Perimeter Fence Project And Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Folsom Zoo Sanctuary (Zoo) encompasses 6.7 acres. The perimeter of the Zoo has an existing fence that has a main purpose of containing animals should they escape from their enclosures. Fencing around the Zoo also provides additional security by precluding unwanted trespassing of people andlor other animals that may attempt to enter the Zoo. The perimeter fence includes four gates that allow for maintenance vehicle access. There is also the main entry which provides a control point for guest entry/exit into the Zoo.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is responsible for enforcing the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which was passed by the United States Congress in 1966. The AWA sets general standards for humane care and treatment of animals exhibited to the public. The USDA also issues licenses which allow zoos to operate. The USDA issued license for the Zoo is renewed every year.
I
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
In November of 2022, an inspector visited the Zoo and conducted a perimeter walk of the facility. The inspector gave a verbal notice to Jocelyn Smeltzer, the Zoo Manager, that the perimeter fence did not meet the height requirement and necessary tree and shrub clearance from perimeter fence zone requirements. The existing perimeter fence is as low as 6' in many locations, including near the front entry. It was stated that the required height of the perimeter fencing should be 8' and that all trees and shrubs within three feet of the fence must be removed or trimmed per the requirement. The verbal notice was provided, and the inspector indicated that an extremely thorough inspection would occur in early 2024to assess whether compliance had been achieved. If the perimeter fence is not changed to 8' feet high around the entire facility, a written notice of failure to comply would be issued.
Once the first inspection occurs, USDA provides up to two (2) additional inspections within a 60- day period. If the Zoo is still not in compliance, the License will not be issued, and a penalty of $10,000 will be levied for each day of non-compliance. In addition, a cease-and- desist order will be issued, which means the Zoo would be required to close its doors and not be open to the public. Even thoughthe Zoo would be shut down, the penalty fee would still be applied since animals are still housed inthe Zoo'
USDA has launched a new 3^year licensing cycle. Based on the cohort the Zoo is in, the upcoming 2024 inspection is now treated as an extremely strict pre-license inspection.
There is an appeal process, which would allow the Zoo to contest the inspection findings. The appeal process, in the non-compliant perimeter fence case, is not applicable since the fence, in fact, does not physically meet the requirements.
The perimeter fence requirement for the Zoo is a USDA mandate, and therefore, a responsibility of the City to meet the requirement.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of 570,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.
ANALYSIS
The initial rough order of magnitude cost estimate for the perimeter fence, prepared in December 2022, was $1,200,000. At the January 24,2023 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to reserve the $507,700 of remaining American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) money for the Zoo Perimeter Fence Project. There was also discussion from the City Council for staff to discuss this project with the Parks & Recreation Commission. This discussion was to include how best to proceed with the project and to review potential funding sources to cover the unidentified project funding balance of $692,300. 2 Page 48
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
Staff worked diligently since January and modified the project scope and corresponding design to meet USDA requirements, and more importantly, bring the estimated cost down to $710,000.
Parks & Recreation Department staff prepared the bid package and solicited bids via the City website and www.CIPLIST.com. Staff notified contractors, who previously completed fencing projects successfully for the City, that the project was out to bid and available to download on the aforementioned sites. The project was issued for bid on June 6,2023. A total of six bids were received on June 29,2023. Two of the bids were considered non-responsive, i.e., bid package was incomplete or bidder lacks the ability to satisfactorily perform the work.
The remaining four bids with add alternates are identified below. Add alternates are portions of the project which are bid separately. This allows staff to manage costs in case costs come in higher than expected.
As described in the "Notice to Contractors" section of the bid package, the Contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive responsible Bidder based on any combination of Base Bid and Alternates as determined by the City. The responsive responsible bidders are as follows:
Contractor Base Bid Add Alt #l Add Alt#2 Add Alt #3 Total Golden Bay
Fence Plus
Ironworks,
Inc.
$563,841.00 $7,317.00 $9,063.00 $10,070.00 $590,291.00
Arrow
Creative
Solutions
$556,897.84 s17,179.77 $24,970.74 $27,665.07 $626,7t3.42 North State
General
Engineering
$586,183.00 $33,840.00 $43,560.00 $29,400.00 $692,983.00 Crusader
Fence
$863,622.85 $13,480.00 $26,960.00 $29,956.00 $934,018.85 Staff reviewed the submittal from Golden Bay Fence Plus lronworks, Inc. and found their bid to be responsive to the Request for Bids. The Engineer's estimate for this project was $710,000.
The Parks & Recreation Department has found the bid and submittal to be in order and recommends that the contract, including base bid and all three add alternates be awarded to the responsive low-bidder, Golden Bay Fence Plus lronworks, Inc. Staff will use the Crty's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
F'INANCIAL IMPACT
At the January 24, 2023 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to reserve the $507,700 of remaining American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) money for the Zoo Perimeter Fence Project. There is also an additional $123,982 available in funding from other Parks and J Page 49
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
Recreation ARPA-funded projects that came in under budget. The total funding available in ARPA tunds for this project is $631,682.
The total project budget, including a I|Yo contingency of $59,029, brings the total project to 5649,320. Funds are available in the general fund to cover the additional $17,638 for the contingency and will be appropriated to this project.
EIWIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, 1500.1 - Relation to Ministerial Projects.
ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 11079 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works, Inc. for the Folsom Zoo Perimeter Fence Project And Appropriation of Funds.
Submitted,
Kelly Gotuilez,PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
4 Page 50
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
RESOLUTION NO. IIO79
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH GOLDEN BAY FENCE PLUS IRON WORKSO INC. FOR THE FOLSOM ZOO PERIMETER FENCE PROJECT AND
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to replace the perimeter fence of the Folsom Zoo Sanctuary to be in compliance with United States Department of Agriculture requirements; and WHEREAS' Parks & Recreation Staff prepared the bid package, solicited sealed bids, and received five bids on June 29,2023,with Golden Bay Fence Plus Ironworks, Inc. being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, $631,682 is currently available in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding; and
WHEREAS' an additional appropriation in the amount of $17,638 is needed, for a revised project budget of $649,320; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Golden Bay Fence Plus Ironworks, Inc. for the Folsom Zoo Perimeter Fence Project in the amount of $590,291; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $17 ,231 , for a total proj ect budget of $649 ,320 .
PASSED Af[D ADOPTED this 25ft day of July 2023,by the following roll-call vote AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11079
Page I of I Page 51
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
This page intenttonally Ieft blank
to facilitqte double- sided printing .
CITY OF
FOLSOl\{
DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
07/25/2023 Item No.6.
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 712s12023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11080 - A Resolution Authorizing Submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2023-24 to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Parks and Recreation Department recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 11080 - A Resolution Authorizing Submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2023-24 to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.
BACKGROT]ND / ISSUE
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) requires annual submission of funding claims regarding the use of Transportation Development Act (TDA) firnds in the form of Local Transportation Funds (LTF). These funds are used by the City of Folsom for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
POLICY / RULE
SACOG requires City Council approval for Transportation Development Act Claim submissions.
ANALYSIS
The portion of LTF funds for pedestrian and bicycle facilities available to the City of Folsom is calculated each year on a percentage of sales tax based on population. The amount of $115,636, which includes all LTF pedestrian and bicycle funds, is the amount estimated by SACOG to be available for Fiscal Year 2023-24.
1
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
F'INANCIAL IMPACT
Appr"*l"f th" Fiscal Year 2022-23 TDA claim, inthe amount of $115,636, by the City of f'onom and the SACOG Board of Directors will provide additional funding for pedestrian and bicycle facility projects without reliance on the Crty's General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 11080 - A Resolution Authorizing Submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2023-24 to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2. Transportation Development Act Claim Packet
Submitted,
Kelly Gor:.r;alez, Parks and Recreation Department Director 2 Page 54
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
ATTACHMENT 1
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
RE,SOLUTION NO. 11080
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF FOLSOM TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE F'ACILITIES FY 2023-24 TO THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF'GOVERNMENTS WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1974 allows two percent (2%) of the Local Transportation Fund apportionment to be made available exclusively for pedestrian and bicycle facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to utilize these authorized TDA fund for construction, maintenance, and repair of existing and future bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout the City of Folsom; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments has estimated the amount of TDA funds available to the City of Folsom for bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Fiscal Year 2023-24 to be $115,636; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments requires a claim package be submitted to receive the TDA allocation, including a resolution approved by the City Council authorizing the filing of the claim; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe City Council ofthe City of Folsom authorizes submission of Folsom Transportation Development Act Claim for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Year 2023-24 inthe amount of $115,636, along with any subsequent amendments should the amount of requested funds be adjusted.
PASSED Al[D ADOPTED this 25ft day of July 2023,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11080
Page I of I Page 56
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
4 Page 57
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
SAIOG
TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT
CLAIM PACKE1
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
I4l5 L Street. Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
TRANSPORTATION DNVNT,OPNNNNT ACT
Cwvr Cnncrr,rsr
please check the following items as either included with the attached TDA claim package or on file at SACOG Item Claimant Attached On File
TDA-I Annual Transportation Development Claim All Claimants X N/A TDA-2 Project and Expenditure Plan (for the fiscal
year of this claim and prior fiscal year) All Claimants X N/A TDA-3 Status of Previously Approved Projects All Claimants X N/A TDA-4 Statement of Conformance All Claimants X N/A
TDA-5 TDA Claim Certification All Claimants X N/A
Resolution by governing body that authorized the claim All Claimants X N/A CHP Safety Compliance Report (completed within the
last 13 months)
Claimants for transit service
Adopted or proposed budget for the fiscal year of the
claim
Claimants for transit service
Signed copy of transit service contract Claimants for transit service Area wide transfer agreement and resolution Claimants that allow inter- system transfers
Information establishing eligibility under effi ciency
criteria - STA Operator Qualifring Criteria calculation based on Section 99314.6
Claimants for revenue-
based STA funds
Certification that claim is consistent with Capital
Improvement Program
Claimants for bike/ped
facilities X N/A
Compliance with PUC Sections 99155 and99155.5 Claimants for transit service Copy of Ten-Year Capital & Operations Program Claimants for transit service
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
TO
TDA_I.
TRANSPORTATION DNVNT,OPMENT ACT CT,I,NN
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
l4l5 L Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
F'ROM:
Claimant City of Folsom,
Parks and Recreation Department
Address
City
Contact Person
Telephone
E-Mail
50 Natoma Street
Folsom Zip Code 95630
Brett Bollinger
(e16) 461-6632
[email protected]
The above claimant hereby requests, in accordance with authority granted under the Transportation Development Act and applicable rules and regulations adopted by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), that its request for funding be approved as follows:
LTF':
$
s
10,038 Amended
I15.636
F'Y
FY
2022-23
2023-24
$ 125,674 Total Claim
STA: None
Kelly GonzalezSubmiued by:
Title:
Date:
Parks and Recreation Director
Jruly 25,2023
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
Claimanfi City of Folsom Fiscal Year: BY 23-24
TotalGeneIaltrtmd
trlrrd Balance-
Tnmlt Fedesdlstste
Othcrhcome
and Intercst
TDASTA.SGR
E t2l-22 TnnsitFarcs
lDALM
f,.23-24
lDASTA
Yr2ta2
PrujectTtth and
TDA Article Nurnber
$115,636.00Artblo 8 Section 9923(o)
Pedesuainard Bftes
$1 15,636.00
$0.00 $1r 5,636.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Totrl $l 15,636,00 $0.00
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
TDA_3
Srnrus or PnnvrouslY APPRovEn Pno.rncrs
Instructions
-
Describe the status of all prior fiscal year TDA claim projects and any projects from previous years that are still active, as follows:
r Include both operating and capital budgets
r Approved amounts should be specified in TDA claims approved by SACOG r Expenditures should be to date
r Project status should be either "Complete" or "Active" Fiscal Year Project Title Amount
Approved Expenditures Project
Status
FY 2023-24
Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail
(PKl604) $200,000 $o Active
FY 2020-21 Trail Connection Projects Design $110,000 $110,000 Complete FY 2018-19
Lake Natoma Class I Trail - Phase II
(PK0e02) $124,900 $124,900 Complete
FY 2018-19
Johnny Cash Trail - Phase II
(PK27rt) $96,660 $96,660 Complete
TOTAL $531,560 $367,560
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
TDA-4
Sr,lrnunNT oF Coxronvnxcn
Form TDA-4 must be completed and signed by the Administrative Office of the submitting claimant' Certified by the Finance Director
Stacey Tamagni
Date
Certified by City Clerk
Christa Freemantle
Date
The City of Folsom hereby certifies that the Transportation Development Act claim for fiscal year FY 2l-22 (revised) and22-23 in the amount of $115.636 (LTF) and $0 (STA) for a total of $115'636 conforms to the requirements of the Transportation Development Act and applicable rules and regulations. (See Attachment A for listing of conformance requirements)
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
TDA_5
TDA Cr,arna CnnrrrrcATloN Fonnn
Signature of Finance Director
Stacey Tamagni
Agency Name City of Folsom
Date
I, Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director for the of Folsom
do hereby attest, as required under the California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Division3, Chapter 2, Section 6632,to the reasonableness and accuracy of the following:
(a) The attached budget or proposed budget for FY 2023-2024 (b) The attached certification by the Department of the California Highway Patrol veriffing that The City of Folsom is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the (c)
Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section9925l.
The revised amount of FY 2022-2023 maximum eligibility for moneys from the Local Transportation Fund and State Assistance Fund, as defined in Section 6634 is $10 038
(d) The estimated amount of FY 2023-2024 maximum eligibility for moneys from the Local Transportation Fund and State Assistance Fund, as defined in Section 6634 is $ I 15,636
07/25/2023 Item No.7.
L Jrtril:r! l. t.':.r!:i
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 11081 - A Resolution Accepting the Grant Award from the Regional Active Transportation Program for the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure Project and Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan (adopted by City Council June2022) identifies a Class I bike trail, referred to as the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail, extending from the Humbug-Willow Creek Trail near Mercy Hospital to Iron Point Road. The proposed project will provide Class I trail improvements for bicycles and pedestrians for approximately 1.6 miles from Humbug-Willow Creek Trail, which is between Creekside Drive and Oak Avenue Parkway on the west, to Iron Point Road on the east. Most of the proposed project would parallel East Bidwell Street along the Southern Pacific Placerville Branch right-of-way and would be within the existing Sauamento-Placerville Transportation Corridor (SPTC) Joint Powers Authority (JPA).
In June 2015, Parks and Recreation Department staff prepared and submitted a grant application to the Regional Active Transportation Funding Program in the amount of $1,048,036 to provide the necessary funds for design and construction of the Folsom Placerville Rail Trail. On December 3,2015, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Board approved the City's proposal for the full amount of the grant request. The City Council, at the March 8,2016 meeting, approved the grant award acceptance for the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Project. In March 2017, the City Council awarded a contract to Kimley-Horn and 1 MEETING DATE: 712512023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1 081 - A Resolution Accepting the Grant Award from the Regional Active Transportation Program for the Folsom- Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure Project and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
Associates to prepare the environmental analysis and design/engineering plans (up to 30o/o complete) for the Folsom Placerville Rail Trail Project.
On March 3,2023,the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Board approved the City's proposal for the full amount of the grant request. Staff is now seeking City Council approval for acceptance and use of the grant. Parks and Recreation Department staff is requesting approval from City Council for accepting the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Regional Active Transportation Program Grant funds.
ANALYSIS
fhe Folrom-Placerville Rail Trait project is estimated to be approximately 1.6-miles in length and will be constructed within the JPA corridor. The trail will be l2-feetwide with shoulders and will extending from the Humbug-Willow Creek Trail near Mercy Hospital to Iron Point Road.
East Bidwell Street experiences heavy traffic volumes and cyclists and pedestrians currently have very limited facilities to move within this conidor. This new trail would provide a facility physically separated from East Bidwell Street, providing direct connections to the many destinations along the East Bidwell Street corridor, specifically Folsom Lake College and businesses along the corridor. The proposed project is consistent with the Active Transportation Plan (ATP adopted by City Council June2022), SACOG Final Regional Trail Network (adopted April 2022), and East Bidwell Street Complete Streets Conidor Plan (adopted by City Council in February 2015).
F'INANCIAL IMPACT
The total grant funding requested was $1,700,000. There is no required local match for this project's grant application because it is considered a Small Infrastructure project per the Active Transportation Program Guidelines. However, leveraging local matching funds is looked on favorably for the project's application. The total local match for this project would be $300,000, or l5Yo of the total grant funding request. The total project funding from this grant would be $2,000,000 ($1,700,000 grant + $300,000 match). The total project budget would increase from $1,233,838 to $3,233,838, which would be enough funds to complete design and construction of the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail.
The City designated $300,000 in matching funds to be divided between Transportation Demand Management Fund (Fund 248) andTransportation System Management Fund (Fund 206). TheDepartmentrecommendsappropriating$175,000fromFund206and$125,000from Fund 248. There are sufficient funds available to cover these matches. 2 Page 66
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The requested action is not considered a project under CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(bX3).
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11081 - A Resolution Accepting the Grant Award from the Regional Active Transportation Program for the Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure Project and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,
Kelly Gor.zalez,
Parks and Recreation Department Director
J Page 67
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
RESOLUTION NO. 11081
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE GRANT AWARD F'ROM THE REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FOR THE F'OLSOM.PLACERVILLE RAIL
TRAIL GAP CLOSURE PROJECT AND APPROPRIATION OF F'UNDS
WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 in 2013 to fund projects and programs that will increase biking and walking. SACOG must submit a final funding recommendation to the CTC in May to be adopted by the June CTC meeting; and WHEREAS, The ATP is a highly competitive program jointly managed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Transportation Commission (CTC).
Metropolitan planning orgarizations like SACOG distribute a portion of these funds through a competitive process, with all final regional recommendations subject to approval from the CTC; and
WHEREAS, in May 2022, the City Council approved the submittal of the Regional Active Transportation Program Grant application for the Folsom Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure Project; and
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2023, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Board approved the full grant amount of $1,700,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom Approves the acceptance of a grarfi. award from the Regional Active Transportation Funding Program in the amount of $1,700,000; and
Appoints the Parks and Recreation Department Director, as agent of the City of Folsom to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; and
Authorizes the Chief Financial Officer to increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations by $1,700,000, the grant award, to the Humbug-Willow Creek Fund (Fund 223); and
Authorizes the Chief Financial Officer to appropriate matching funds in the amount of $300,000 split between the Transportation System Management Fund (Fund 206) $ 175,000 and Transportation Demand Act (Fund 248) $125,000.
Resolution No. 11081
Page I ofZ
hereby
1. 2
J
4
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PASSED Al[D ADOPTED onthis 25thday of July 2023by the following roll call vote:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 11081
Page2 of2
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
This page intenttonally left blCInk
to facilitote double- sided printing .
CIT Y OF
FOLS(}l\{
DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
07/25/2023 Item No.8.
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 712s12023
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. I 1083 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Design Consulting
Services with M. Neils Engineering, Inc. for an Electric Vehicle Charging System at the Corporation Yard
FROM: Public Works Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11083 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Design Consulting Services with M. Neils Engineering, Inc. for an Electric Vehicle Charging System at the Corporation Yard.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved a new set of rules, known as Advanced Clean Fleet, requiring the phase-in of zero-emissions vehicles (ZBV),banning the sale of diesel trucks by 2036 and requiring large fleets to be all-electric by 2045.
To begin the transition to a fuIl fleet of ZEV's the Solid Waste Department has ordered two electric refuse trucks which are expected to be delivered in2024.In addition to the buildout of electric refuse trucks, the city also has various other miscellaneous electric vehicles that require electric charging stations.
The Public Works Department has been working with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) to determine electricity needs and the most beneficial way to implement the electric vehicle charging system for the corporation yard fleet as the city moves into this new era of fully electric vehicles.
I
07/25/2023 Item No.9.
Staff has determined that this initial buildout phase of the corporation yard electric vehicle charging system should be able to accommodate 30 electric refuse trucks and20 miscellaneous vehicles.
M. Neils, Inc. was chosen to design the charging system layout, electric design, charging and monitoring software and constructable bid documents for a system that can grow with the city as additional electric refuse trucks and vehicles are purchased. The plan is to install a new dedicated transformer and all underground conduit that can easily be used to expand as the ZEY fleetgrows.
Regarding the city's anticipated plan to relocate the corporation yard to a new location, it is anticipated that the new transformer and electric vehicle chargers will be able to be relocated and utilized at the new location. All other underground infrastructure installed will not be able to be relocated.
POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $70,952 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.
ANALYSIS
On May 15,2023, Public Works staff prepared and publicly advertised a Request for Proposal (RFP) for interested firms to provide Professional Engineering for the design of an Electric Vehicle Charging System. On June 8,2023, two proposals were received. A review panel consisting of a Public Works Engineer, the General Services Manager, and the Fleet Manager separately evaluated and scored the received proposals. The summary of the review scores is as follows:
X'irm Name
o M. Neils Engineering, Inc.
o Steady Solutions
Total Score
100
35 M. Neils Engineering, Inc. submitted a comprehensive and informative proposal detailing their relevant and local experience providing similar services for other local municipalities in the Sacramento region. The cost of the scope and fee provided by M. Neils Engineering, Inc. is $68,900.
Staff will use the City's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The electric vehicle charging system project was anticipated and included in the approved Fiscal Year 2023-24 Solid Waste Operating Budget in the amount of $200,000. The design 2 Page 72
07/25/2023 Item No.9.
consulting services contract would be authorized for a not to exceed amount of $68,900. Staff will be preparing a bid package for the construction phase of the project later this year and will be presenting that contract to Council for review and approval. It is anticipated that an additional appropriation will be required to fund the construction phase of the project.
Staff is requesting that an agreement for Design Consulting Services in the amount of $68,900 be authorized with M. Neils Engineering, Inc. for an Electric Vehicle Charging System.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Design contracts are not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. It is anticipated that the construction of this electric vehicle charging facility will be deemed categorically exempt under multiple exemption categories.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11083 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Design Consulting Services with M. Neils Engineering, Inc. for an Electric Vehicle Charging System at the Corporation Yard
Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
a
-t Page 73
07/25/2023 Item No.9.
RESOLUTION NO. 11083
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT F'OR DESIGN CONSULTING SERVICES WITH M. NEILS ENGINEERING,INC. FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SYSTEM AT THE
CORPORATION YARD
WHEREAS, the city is required to transition their fleet of vehicles to be all-electric by 2045; and
WHEREAS, the Solid Waste Division has ordered two electric refuse trucks that are expected to be delivered in 2024 andwill require charging capabilities; and WHEREAS, on May 25,2023, Public Works staff prepared and publicly advertised a Request for Proposal to provide Professional Engineering for design of an electric vehicle charging system; and
WHEREAS, on June 8,2023, two proposals were received and a review panel consisting of Public Works Department staff separately evaluated and scored the proposals; and WHEREAS, staff selected M. Neils Engineering, Inc. to provide design consulting services for a not to exceed contract amount of $68,900; and WHEREAS, the electric vehicle charging system project was anticipated and included in the approved Fiscal Year 2023-24 Solid Waste Operating Budget in the amount of $200,000; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attomey:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement for Design Consulting Services with M.
Neils Engineering, Inc. for an electric vehicle charging system at the corporation yard in the amount of $68,900.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25ft day of July 2023,by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
Councilmember(s):
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 11083
Page I ofl
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
07/25/2023 Item No.9.
h
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends, that the City Council review the attached Report of utilities delinquencies, hold a public hearing on the Report and accept any oral or written public comment, and adopt Resolution No. 11078 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect such Charges on the Tax Roll.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City provides various utilities services to properties throughout the City, including sewer, water, and garbage services, for which the City charges a fee for service. While most accounts within the City are current, there are some delinquent utilities accounts. A Delinquent Utilities Charge Report ("Report") speciffing the delinquency by parcel number and type of property is attached showing delinquencies totaling $387,686.99.
Following notice and a public hearing, the City Council may pass a resolution,by il least a two-thirds vote, requesting that the County Auditor/Tax Collector transfer the City's delinquent utilities charges to the property tax roll for collection with property taxes. Staff recommends the City Council consider the attached Report, hold a public hearing, and accept public comments on this matter, and authorize transfer of any delinquent utilities' charges to the County for collection on the property tax roll.
I
MEETING DATE: 712s12023
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1078 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of
Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect Such on the Tax Roll
F'ROM: Finance Department
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
Despite some delinquencies, the City has had remarkable success in utility collections.
Utility billing collections average $45,607,707 annually. These collections include water, city sewer, and solid waste services. The total utility delinquency amount is approximately $515,000. The City has a total of 26,523 open accounts. The total number of delinquent open accounts is 460. The delinquency dollar amount represents al.lVo utility delinquency rate for the City.
POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code and state law provide that, following notice and a public hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution transferring delinquent utilities charges to the County tax roll for collection with property taxes. (Cal. Gov't Code 25831, 38790.1; Cal. Health and Safety Code gg 5470 et seq.; Folsom Municipal Code Chapters 3.20 (collection of municipal service charges generally) 13.12 (collection of sewer charges). The resolution authorizing the transfer must be passed by the City Council by a two-thirds vote. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473).
ANALYSN
The City provides sewer, water, and garbage services to properties within the City, for which it charges the users. While the vast majority of accounts throughout the City are current, there are some accounts that are more than 60 days delinquent in payment and appropriate for transfer to the County tax ro11 for collection. The total amount of these eligible delinquent accounts is $387,686.99 as indicated on the attached Report. The Report captures accounts that were noticed with a delinquent amount of $500 or greater. The City has not charged any penalties or shut off water on delinquent accounts since March of 2020. The last time a request was made to transfer delinquent utilities to the tax roll was July of 2020.
State law authorizes the City Council, by resolution adopted by at least a two-thirds vote, to request that the County Auditor/Tax Collector transfer these delinquent amounts to the properly tax roll for collection with general property taxes. Prior notice of the hearing is to be mailed to the property owners not less than ten days before the hearing. (Cal. Gov't Code $$ 38790.1 ,25831). Notice is also to be published in a newspaper of general circulation for \two consecutive weeks prior to the hearing. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473.1; Cal.
Gov't Code $ 6066). City staff has satisfied these notice requirements by mailing notice to affected property owners on June 22,2023. A public hearing notice was published in the Folsom Telegraph on July 6,2023, and July 13,2023.
Following a public hearing, the City Council has discretion to adopt the Report as presented, modifu the Report, or decline to adopt the Report. However, if the City Council finds that valid protests are made by the owners of a majority of separate parcels of property described 2 Page 76
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
in the Report, the Council may not adopt the Report and may not transfer the delinquencies to the tax roll. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473.2). Upon passage of the resolution confirming the Report of delinquencies, as presented, or modified, the Revenue Division will transmit the Report to the Auditor/Tax Collector for placement of the charges on the tax rolls for collection with property taxes. County staff has advised City staff that in order to have the matters placed on the tax ro11 for this year, the Report must be transmitted to the County no later thanAugust 4' 2023.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City currently has $387,686.99 in delinquent charges that are appropriate for transfer to the tax rolls. Approving this item and authorizing the transfer will help toward collection of these amounts. Should the County accept these amounts, the City will receive payment directly from the County for these amounts and the County will pursue collection through the tax rolls.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a ooprojecf'under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and does not require environmental review.
ATTACHMENTS
l. Resolution No. 11078 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect such Charges on the Tax Roll Submitted,
Stacey Tamagni, CPA
Director of Finance
J Page 77
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
RESOLUTION NO. 11078
A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'F'OLSOM APPROVING
AND CONF'IRMING THE REPORT OF'DELINQUENT UTILITIES CHARGES AND
REQUESTING SACRAMENTO COUNTY TO COLLECT SUCH CHARGES ON THE
TAX ROLL
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom (the "City") provides certain solid waste, water, and sewer services to its residents and occupants; and
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 25831and 38790.1, California Health and Safety Code sections 5473 et seq. and Chapters 3.20 and 13.12 of the Folsom Municipal Code authorize the City to have the delinquent charges for the above services (the "Charges") collected on the tax roll by Sacramento County on the relevant parcels; and
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared a Delinquent Utilities Charge Report (the "Report") identifuing the delinquent charges by Assessor's Parcel Number; and WHEREAS, a hearing was held on July 25,2023, at which the City Council reviewed and considered the Report and any protests related thereto, with prior notice of the hearing being provided as required by law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom:
l. Findings. In reviewing and considering the delinquent Charges and the Report, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:
a. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least once a week for two consecutive weeks prior to the City Councii public hearing, and notice was mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to each affected property owners at addresses as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll or as known to the City; and,
b. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council included the date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, and a general explanation of the matter to be considered; and,
c. Upon considering all objections and protests received at the time of the hearing on this matter, the City Council finds that protest by owners of a majority of the parcels of property described in the Report does not exist.
Z. Confirming the Report. The City Council hereby approves, confirms, and adopts the Report, as directed and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and determines that thi Charges are proper and correct. The City Council directs the Finance Director to make any amendments to the Report as were directed by the City Council and as necessary to remove ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
parcels from the Report for which payment has been made before transfer of the amounts to Sacramento County for collection on the tax roll, subject to the same penalties, procedure, and sale in case of delinquency as provided for those taxes.
3. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk to deliver a certified copy of the finalized Report to the Sacramento County Department of Finance - Auditor Division and to submit a certified copy of this Resolution and Report to the County Recorder for recordation.
4. Services of Sacramento Countv. The Offices of the Sacramento County Department of Finance - Auditor Division is requested for the placement of the Charges on the Annual Secured property tax roll with the Ad Valorem taxes.
5. General Authorization. The City Manager, City Finance Director, City Clerk, City Attorney and the other officers and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed, individually and collectively, to do any and all things and to execute, deliver, and perform any and all agreements and documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the City that are in conformity with the purposes and intent of this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed, and approved in all respects.
6. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25ft day of Juty 2023,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Member(s)
NOES: Council Member(s)
ABSENT: Council Member(s)
ABSTAIN: CouncilMember(s)
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
City of Folsom Delinquent Utilify Charges
as of 7/1912023
Parcel Number
07L-0020-t11-0000
072-t190-L17-0000
070-0105-011-0000
077-OO20-L03-0000
072-20to-o38-0000
072-0870-028-0000
072-L730-005-0000
072-12sO-O89-0000
072-7190-L54-0000
072-Ls60-013-0000
071-0650-060-0000
072-1040-054-0000
071-0101-00s-0000
071-0920-008-0000
07L-0470-O06-0000
072-LL90-r09-0000
072-LL90-LL1-0000
072-L6LO-O28-0000
227-0520-007-0000
069-07L0-031-0000
07t-1440-o69-0000
07t-0460-o20-0000
213-0s80-013-0000
072-1060-032-0000
071-1400-045-0000
227-0280-033-0000
072-24tO-037-0000
072-L380-O45-0000
072-t720-037-0000
072-LL90-L53-0000
072-t790-L52-0000
072-1250-042-0000
072-0850-013-0000
072-37tO-025-0000
07L-O243-O42-0000
071-0510-011-0000
071-1850-007-0000
Amount
5 27,95L.74
s 20,950.96
5 t6,9sz.t7
s 6,152.55
S s,zg+.gg
s 5,583.62
s 5,45t.!7
5 5,371.87
5 5,244.50
s 4,995.80
s 4,863.68
s 4,803.54
$ 4,676.44
s 4,601.68
s 4,500.09
5 4,424.06
5 4,248.34
5 ,Lzg.Lo
s 4,!27.72
$ 4,052.94
s 4,042.38
s 3,858.74
s 3,820.66
s 3,775.50
$ 3,762.87
s 3,698.90
s 3,695.71
S 3,647.50
s 3,633.41
$ 3,422.80
5 3,397.7L
$ 3,391.96
s 3,280.16
5 3,257.5L
s 3,236.85
s 3,198.70
S 3,tge.zg
ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
070-0146-003-0000
07L-0290-034-0000
071-0950-021-0000
070-0052-01s-0000
071-0390-032-0000
072-LLO0-031-0000
072-L8[O-O01-0000
070-0116-022-0000
071-0750-009-0000
072-3L70-O19-0000
07L-O23L-O03-0000
072-1370-024-0000
07r-L460-017-0000
070-oL20-o02-0000
071-1500-012-0000
071-0950-053-0000
072-Lt90-710-0000
072-O700-007-0000
227-0390-097-0000
071-0390-016-0000
071-0300-053-0000
070-0210-028-0000
071-0600-014-0000
227-0420-006-0000
071-1840-008-0009
072-3630-01s-0000
070-01ss-006-0000
071-0290-006-0000
072-L740-019-0000
07L-L200-O29-0000
072-L2LO-L06-0000
072-1050-050-0000
071-1810-027-0049
2L3-OO7r-O32-0000
07L-OL72-011-0000
072-2320-015-0000
071-1030-027-OO00
070-0052-015-0000
071-1600-076-0000
072-3870-070-0000
07L-O700-047-0000
071-1810-049-0037
072-3660-071-0000
5 3,r75.tL
s 3,L14.74
s 3,091.60
s 3,009.70
s 3,003.13
s 2,997.80
5 2,974.00
5 2,9L8.94
5 2,9t7.4o
s 2,898.98
5 2,889.74
s 2,839.32
$ 2,801.03
5 2,788.26
5 2,775.67
5 2,729.22
s 2,722.49
5 2,69L.LL
s 2,686.95
s 2,626.86
5 2,543.2L
s 2,469.33
5 2,4L6.34
5 2,394.57
s 2,352.29
5 2,302.39
5 2,29L.47
5 2,284.32
5 2,220.07
s 2,208.81
5 2,L5t.47
5 2,t37.r3
s 2,LL5.74
s 2,109.06
5 2,067.04
5 2,023.72
s 2,018.70
s 1,993.73
S 1,938.75
s 1,919.60
s 1,856.87
S r,944.64
s 1,835.25
ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
070-0193-004-0000
072-3530-018-0000
071-0660-060-0000
072-0940-045-0000
071-0510-044-0000
072-2930-155-0000
072-2670-028-0000
213-0820-023-0000
077-L490-O01-0000
072-2L70-O30-0000
07L-2060-O13-0000
072-2790-008-0005
07L-t200-o2s-0000
071-0890-001-0000
072-0940-021-0000
072-2830-004-0029
o72-t740-024-0000
071-0163-024-0000
071.-O760-023-0000
072-0740-013-0000
071-0091-008-0000
071-0093-005-0000
213-0630-004-0000
072-3rso-013-0000
071-L300-021-0000
072-L390-O50-0000
072-3810-054-0000
072-2830-005-0025
071-1810-032-0017
071-1840-007-0003
072-3970-027-0000
072-t620-O64-0000
071-0350-014-0000
071-1300-046-0000
072-1880-042-0000
072-3760-035-0000
072-4000-032-0000
072-2780-063-0000
07t-o2t4-o07-0000
077-7470-O27-0000
072-3780-02s-0000
07L-I420-O24-OOO0
072-0890-031-0000
s 1,819.05
$ L,796.92
5 7,704.42
s L,686.36
$ t,677.39
s 1,673.58
S 1,609.52
s 1,583.62
s 1,578.39
S 1,562.10
s 1,553.86
5 t,s43.46
s 1,540.60
s 1,506.99
s 1,466.33
5 r,440.34
5 L,4rs.97
5 L,375.42
s 1,359.92
S 1,3s9.14
s 1,355.41
S 1,309.26
5 L,289.67
s 1,285.06
s 1,254.76
5 L,2s4.2L
5 L,237.82
5 1,234.69
5 7,2L7.92
s 1,185.32
5 t,L84.92
s 1,181.92
$ L,r73.2s
S L,Lzg.47
5 !,L26.97
s 1,103.37
s 1,062.58
5 r,o49.87
s 1,037.83
s 1,025.81
s 1,005.05
s 981.61
s 96s.19
ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
07L-7730-003-0000
223-0560-001-0000
071-0410-0L3-OOOO
071-1800-068-0000
072-4000-028-0000
072-0750-017-0000
072-2500-027-0000
071-0930-057-0000
2L3-O740-055-0000
227-0550-012-0000
071-1810-074-0052
07t-0290-o22-0000
072-2660-034-0000
07t-0212-003-0000
072-3650-047-0000
072-2030-035-0000
070-0203-018-0000
072-3470-O91-0000
07t-0073-020-0000
227-0600-009-0000
07L-7430-O28-0000
070-0r.54-014-0000
227-0540-003-0000
07L-O620-O13-0000
072-t270-O39-0000
072-0700-035-0000
071-0073-023-0000
072-t990-O20-0000
$
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
S
s
5 s
940.94
911.80
908.87
894.79
830.63
824.O9
809.39
788.46
777.45
746.02
720.5t
702.97
696.88
693.91
669.4s
654.90
642.62
606.92
601.09
597.44
588.96
557.67
s51.80
549.20
538.91
526.2t
518.30
500.87
ResolutionNo. 11078
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
This page intentionally left blsnk
to focilitote double- sided printing .
FOLSOM
CITY OF
DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
07/25/2023 Item No.10.
: i ') ; a:i :.i l|i
r 1!r,';,;{ r.a t.r! ri
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 712s12023
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11082 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council conduct the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 11082 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 American River CanyonNorth, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone UnitNo. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
On June 25,2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. I1059 - Resolution No. 1 1059 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge lliReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs. The Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting (L&L) Districts addresses the annual assessment for each of the City's 30 existing Landscaping and Lighting Districts.
As was the case in Fiscal Year 2022-2023,Natoma Station-Union Square L&L will not be assessed for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 since the Homeowners' Association has elected to cover maintenance costs at this time.
POLICY / RULE
Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22586, an annual Engineer's Report shall be filed with the City Clerk. The City Council is also required to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment pursuant to Section 22631of the Streets and Highway Code.
ANALYSIS
The Preliminary Engineer's Report approved by Resolution No. 11059 described the maintenance and servicing to be performed in the City's 30 Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. The establishment of annual assessments for each of the L&L Districts requires a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment. The Engineer's Report is in compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; including but not limited to Sections 22565 et seq (preparing a report that complies with the article); and Sections 22660 and 226 62 (regarding annual installments procedures/proces s).
Assessment to Properties
This year's assessments to properties have been broken up into three categories and are depicted in the provided table below. Districts that are showing an increase in assessments this year are districts that were formed with provisions for CPI (consumer price index) otherwise known as an escalator, or cost of living increase. Many of these districts are newer districts or overlay districts that either still do not have an adequate fund balance or need the additional assessments to achieve a balanced budget. The next category is static or no increase. These are the districts that do not have provisions for CPI's or have CPI's but do not need to utilize them currently to achieve a balanced budget. The last category is decrease, these are districts that have an adequate fund balance and do not need to levy the fuIl assessment to achieve a balanced budget. There was also one (1) district being removed from the tax roll, Union Square because it has an HOA that manages their landscape areas.
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Difference lncrease /
Decrease
FY 2023124'
Maximum
Authorized Rate
FY 202212? FY zOZZlZqDistrict
i ncreased s sos.84s 25s.86 27L.22$ s 1.36American River Canyon North No. 3 N,Us 5 12.77 i ncreased 40.uss 28.07Broadstone No. 3
S r.rs i ncreased 4r.77sS gg.gs 4!.L6sBroadstone No. 4-Zone A S gg.zr39.20s S r.rq i ncreased$ sa.osBroadstone No.4-Zone B s L.12 i ncreased 38.65sS gz.sz 38.54sBroadstone No. ul-Zone C s 1.10 i ncreased 37.91ss 35.80 37.905Broadstone No.4-Zone D s 234.ss208.58s s o.2o i ncre ase dS 208.38Folsom Heights No. 2 S zo.gg i ncreased s 1"012.06S sso.sz 877.36sNatoma Valley S ssg.ozs 313.91 333.02s s 19.11 i ncreasedPrairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 s 7,269.82 S gs.go i ncreased s 1,269.83s 1,173,86Prospect Ridge $ os.ro i ncreased s 429.79S 363.68 429.78sSierra Estates $ 732.32s r32.27s s L32.27 i ncreasedSilverbrook
728.24s s 191.s7 i ncreased S 728.24S sso.ozThe Residences at American River Canyon S 342.s3 i ncreased S 1,512.50s 1"159.97 s 1"512.50The Residences at American River Canyon ll s 107.6sto7.Ms s 4.13 i ncreasedS rog.srWillow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone A&B S s.er i ncreased 98.96ss ss.1s 98.95sWillow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone C reduced 77.70s5 77.70 55.48s s Q2.22l.American River Canyon North No. 2
74.86s s $43.74l. reduced $ 218.50s 218,50Blue Ravine Oaks s (213.26) reduced s 107.705 zB.za sBlue Ravine Oaks No. 2 s 164.99s 154.99 7&.98s s (0.01) reducedBroadstone
139.48s S (o,rs) reduced $ 2s!.22S rsg.64Cobble Ridge
s (0.01) reduced s 213.61s 213.61 213.60sPrairie Oaks Ranch s 109.88s 109.88 [email protected] s (0.01) reducedWillow Creek Estates South s static s 102.94s 102.94 r02.94sAmerican River Canyon North static 5 L22.28s 122.28 122.28s sBriggs Ranch
s 113.14s 113.14 L73.74s s staticCobble Hills lllReflections ll
70.88s s static 70.88ss 70.88Folsom Heights
s static s 195.78s 19s.78 195.78sHannaford Cross
s 183.s8183.58s s static$ rss.saLake Natoma Shores
LzI.L8s s static $ 121.18s 121.18Los Cerros
static S 91.71S gr.zo 97.70s sNatoma Station
s 1s7.58757.68s s statics 1s7.68Stee plechase
s static 80.40ss 80,40 80.40sWillow Creek Estates East
static 28.74ss 28.L4 28.L4s sWillow Springs
Assessment to Properties by District
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Installment Summar.v
The installment summaries describe short-term installments collected pursuant to Section 22660 of the Streets and Highways Code to meet the districts' future repair and replacement needs anticipated to occur within an approximate five-year time frame, as well as long-term installments collected to meet those future needs anticipated to occur within 5 to 3O-year time frames.
Comparison to Last Year
District budgets for this upcoming year will continue focusing on improvements and restorations that enhance each district's commitment to water conservation, prolonging assets life, drought tolerant landscaping improvements, fire safety, and tree stewardship. As such, some districts will be retrofitting and centralizing inigation controllers, inventorying street trees, changing out plant materials to water wise varietals, and converting over to LED Streetlights. Many of the City's districts are over 25 years old and do not have escalators built into their rates to track with cost- of-living increases and economic changes. As such, districts being monitored for future outreach regarding a new assessment overlay district are Briggs Ranch (32 years old), Hannaford Cross (32yearsold), and Cobble Ridge II i Reflections II (29 yearc old). Lastly the City will be continuing outreach for an increase in Natoma Station in the 2023-2024 Fiscal Years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Each Landscaping and Lighting District levies and collects funds to cover operating and maintenance costs attributed to district assets. There is no fiscal impact to the City of Folsom General Fund.
ENVIR AI, REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ATTACHMENTS
l. Resolution No. 11082 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Siena Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
2 Submitted,
Kelly Gonzalez, Parks & Recreation Director
Final Engineer's Report - The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, July 2023
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
ATTACHMENT 1
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
RESOLUTION NO. 1I.082
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S RE,PORT FOR THE FOLLOWING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023. 2024 AMiERICAN RrVER CANYON NORTH, AMERICAi\ RMR CANYON NORTH NO. 2, AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO. 3, BLUE RAVINE OAKS, BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO. 2, BRIGGS RANCH, BROADSTONE, BROADSTONE NO. 4' BROADSTONE UNIT NO. 3, COBBLE RIDGE, COBBLE HILLS RIDGE II/REFLECTIONS rr, FOLSOM IIEIGHTS, FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO. 2, HANNAFORI) cRosso LAKE NATOMA SHORES, LOS CERROS, NATOMA STATION, NATOMA VALLEY, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2, PROSPECT
RIDGE, SIERRA ESTATESO SILVERBROOKO STEEPLECHASE' THE RESIDENCES
AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON, THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER
CANYON II, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH' AND WILLOW SPRTNGS
WHEREAS, On June25,2023,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11059 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IliReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2,Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates EastNo. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs; and
WHEREAS, July 25,2023 at 6:30 p.m. is the day and time set for hearing objections to the levying of said assessments as identified in Exhibit A attached to this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Final Engineer's Report for the Assessment Districts has been made, filed with the City Clerk and considered by the City Council and is deemed sufficient and approved. The Final Engineer's Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this resolution, Section 22500, et. seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council finds that the Final Engineer's Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Districts in full compliance withthe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and,based on said Report, adopt and approve the following actions:
Resolution No. I1082
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Approve as submitted, the Final Engineer's Report filed with this City Clerk for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.
Confirm and approve the diagrams and assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Continue to order the levy of assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Yen2023-2024.
Order the maintenance and servicing of improvements as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Reportfor Fiscal Year2023-2024.
Declare that the assessments set forth in the Final Engineer's Report now constitute liens upon the lots or parcels of land described in said report.
Direct the City Clerk to file a certified copy of said diagrams and assessments with the Auditor of Sacramento County no later than the third Monday in August2023.
Request that the Auditor of Sacramento County enter on the Sacramento County Assessment Roll the assessment for each lot or parcel of land in the amount indicated in the Final Engineer's Report.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25ft day of July 2023by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
Rosario Rodriguez, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1082
Page2 of4
1 2.
a
J
4 5
6 7
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Exhibit A
OF' RESOLUTION No. 11082
CITY OF'F'OLSOM
LANDSCPAING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS
f,'ISCAL YEAR 2023.2024
ResolutionNo. 11082
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
FY 2s22123
assessment per sFE
credit or increase
forFY2SlA
FY 2023124
assessment per SFE
District
s 27r.22269.86s 1.36sAmerican River Canyon North No. 3
72.7/s s 4A.UBroadstone No. 3 28.07s
39.98s 1,18s s 41.16Broadstone No.4-Zone A
L.t4s s 39.20Broadstone No.4-Zone B 38.06s
37.52s 1.72s s 38.64Broadstone No.4-Zone C
1.10s 37.90s35.80sBroadstone No,4-Zone D
208.38s s 0.20 s 208.58Folsom Heights No. 2
877.36s856.37s 20.99sNatoma Valley
313.91s 19.11s s 333.02Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
7.269.82s1,173.86s 95.95sProspect Ridge
66.10s 429.78sSierra Estates 353.58s
s t32.27s s L32.27Silverbrook
197.57s s 728.24The Residences at American River Canyon s36.67s r,L69.97s 342.53s s 1,512.50The Residences at American River Canyon ll 107.ils103.51s 4.13sWillow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone A&B
95.15s 3.81s 98.95sWillow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone C
s 55.4877.70s (22.221sAmerican River Canyon North No. 2 218.60s s 143.741 s 74.86Blue Ravine Oaks
213.26s s (213.25) sBlue Ravine Oaks No. 2
(0.01)s 154.98sBroadstone 164.99s
L39.Us (0.16)s s 139.48Cobble Ridge
s (0.01) 213.ffisPrairie Oaks Ranch 2r3.6rs
109.88s (0.01)s 109.87sWillow Creek Estates South
r02.94s102.94s sAmerican River Canyon North
r22.28s s 122.28sBriggs Ranch
713.14s173.t4s sCobble Hills lllReflections ll
70.88s s 70.88sFolsom Heights
r95.78s s r95.78sHannaford Cross
183.58s s s 183.s8Lake Natoma Shores
s 727.18127.18s sLos Cerros
97.70s s 91.70sNatoma Station
r57.68s157.68s sStee plechase
80.40s s s 80.40Willow Creek Estates East
s 28.t428.74s sWillow Springs
Assessment to Properties by District
Resolution No. 11082
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
F'inal Engineer's Report
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
crw oF FoLsoM
Engineer's Report For: Fiscol Yesr 2023/24
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts
C'NBS
June 2023
Prepared by:
hrlplng oommunltlct
tund tomorrow
Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, cA 92592
Tcll lree: 800.676.7516
nbsgov.com Page 96
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Engineer'sletter..........
2.L Background
2.2 Process for Annual Assessment
2.3 LegislativeContext
3. PlansandSpecifications..............
3.1- Description of lmprovements
4. Estimate of Costs and Budgets.........,.....
5. Method of Apportionment.......
5.1 Discussion of Benefit
5.2 Generalversus Special Benefit
5.3 Quantification of General Benefit
L
2 2
3 6
7 5.4
5.5 5.6
5.7 Method of Apportionment........
Assessment Apportion ment.............
Maximum Assessment lncrease.....
Fiscal Year 2023/24 Maximum Assessment'...
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023124 Engineer's Report 18 19
L9
2t
22 23
23 37
37 39
40 42
6. AssessmentDiagram..
7. Budgets
8. Assessment Rolls
CINBS Page 97
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
1. ENGINEER,S LEfiER
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Folsom (the 'Cit/'), State of California, under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the '?ct"), directed NBS to prepare and file an Enginee/s Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2023124, in accordance with Article 4 of chapter 1 of the Act and Article xlll D of the california constitution. The report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the administration, maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2023124, the diagram for the Districts, showing the area and properties to be assessed, and assessing the net amount upon the assessable lots and/or parcels within the Districts in proportion to the special benefit received.
NOW THEREFORE, the assessments as detailed in this Engineer's Report and as summarized in the table below are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real propefi within the Dlstricts in proportion to the special benefit received.
Summary Cost Estimates
(1) Total amount levied may differ slightly due to installment rounding. (2) A list of Districts, the total proposed Fiscal Year 2023124 assessments, the number of parcets assessed, and assessment rates are detailed in section 8 of this Enginee/s Report.
l, the undersigned, respectfully submit this Engineer/s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Enginee/s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared, computed and levied in accordance with the assessment methodologiy adopted, approved and ordered by the City Council of the City of Folsom at the time of each District formation. t
G. Egan, P, E.
Engineer zolat
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts' Fiscal Year 2023/24 Enginee/s Report l
s2,788,834.95lmprovement Costs
351,610.86lncidental Costs
s3,140,445.81Total lmprovement Costs
(s761,610.95)Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
$2,378,8:]4.86Total Balance t6 fl$essel
Total Costs(1)Description
so. 14863
clvll
6. tlrNBS 1
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
2. INTRODUCTION
2.L Background
The City has previously formed 30 Landscaping and Lighting Districts to provide funding for the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, sidewalks, fences, walls, parks, open space, signage, soundwalls, street lighting, and other public improvements in the City. The 30 Landscape and Lighting Districts are as follows:
o American River Canyon North
o American River Canyon North No. 2
o American River Canyon North No. 3
r Blue Ravine Oaks
o Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
o Briggs Ranch
o Broadstone
o Broadstone No.3
r Broadstone No.4
. Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
o Cobble Ridge
o Folsom Heights
o Folsom Heights No. 2
. Hannaford Cross
r Lake Natoma Shores
2.2 Process for Annual Assessment
The Districts were formed and assessments were established in previous fiscal years. As required by the procedures specified in the Act, an Engineer's Report must be prepared on an annual basis which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. The Engineer's Report may also identify future planned projects.
The City council must also annually adopt a resolution of intention which:
r Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein'
o Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements'
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report r Los Cerros
. Natoma Station
o Natoma Valley
o Prairie Oaks Ranch
r Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
o Prospect Ridge
o Sierra Estates
o Silverbrook
o Steeplechase
r The Residences at American River Canyon
. The Residences at American River Canyon ll
. Willow Creek Estates East
. Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
o Willow Creek Estates South
. Willow Springs
2(]INBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
. Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicates the general location of the assessment district.
o Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. r Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
r States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. lf the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment allowed, the City Clerk shall give notice of the public hearing by causing the resolution of intention to be published at |east 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest.
During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. lf the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment allowed, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article Xlll D and Proposition 218.
The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. lf confirmed, the assessments would be submitted to the County Auditor Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll.
2.3 Legislative Context
ln 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, known as the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," which added Articles Xlll C and Xlll D to the California Constitution. Article Xlll D established new substantive and procedural requirements on agencies for levying assessments, being levies on real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. "special benefit" is defined in Article Xlll D as "a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on a real property located in the district or to the public at large."
Article Xlll D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:
. All parcels that will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed must be identified;
r The general benefits must be distinguished from the special benefits conferred on the parcels; r The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel must be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, orthe cost of the property related service being provided;
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 3CINBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
. The amount assessed to a parcel must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and must not include any costs attributable to the general benefiU and
o parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.
Since the initial passage of Proposition 218, several court rulings have helped provide context and direction with respect to the procedures and requirements of Article Xlll D for levying assessments. Several of the key concepts from these rulings are summarized below.
GENERAL BENEFIT
Article Xlll D requires an agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on the identified parcels because only special benefits are assessable.
The Court of Appeal in Golden Hitls Neighborhood Assn., tnc. v. City of San Diego (2OtI) ("Golden Hills"l clarified this concept by stating, "seporotion and quantification of generol and speciol benefits must be occomplished by opportioning the cost of a service or improvement between the two and ossessing property owners onty for the portion of the cost representing special benefits." TheCourtof Appeal inBeutzv.Countyof Riverside (2010) ("Beutz"l notedthatthetrialcourttookjudicial notice of the Legislative Analyst's Office pamphlet titled "Understanding Proposition 218" which states an agency must, "esfim ate the omount of speciol benefit londowners would receive from the proiect or service, os well as the amount of 'generol benefit.'This step is needed because Proposition 2L8 allows local government to recoup from ossessments only the proportionote share of cost to provide the speciol benefit."
The Court in Beutz furthered this idea stating, "separating the generol from the speciol benefits of a public improvement project and estimating the quantity of eoch in relotion to the other is essentiol if on ossessment is to be limited to the speciol benefits'"
The Court of Appeal in Silicon Votley Toxpoyers' Association lncorporoted v. Sonta Clara County Open Space Authority (2008) ("SWA")clarified that general benefits are not restricted to benefits conferred only on persons and property outside the assessment district but can include benefits both conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. The "public at large" includes all members of the public, including those who live, work, and shop within the district, and not simply transient visitors' The Court of Appeal again reiterated the need to separate, quantify and apportion costs to general benefits from the improvemenlsin Brood Beoch Geologic Hozard Abatement District v 3L506 Victoria Point LLC (2022), stating, "The District cites no authority, and we ore owore of none, suggesting that an ogency's subjective intent determines the need to occount for generol benefits-"
BEN EFIT-BASED NOT COST-BASED
ln Town of Tiburon v. Bononder (2009) ("Tiburon"), the Court of Appeal clarified the idea that assessments must be apportioned based upon benefit ratherthan cost. The Court stated, "Proportionate special benefit is the basis upon which o project's totol assessable costs ore apportioned among parcels within an ossessment district."
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 4CINBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
The assessment on a particular property cannot be based on the relative cost of the improvements to the property, but rather on the special benefit conferred on such property. The Court inTiburon also stated, "sn ossessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvement or property-related service, less any omount attributable to general benefits (which may not be ossessed), allocated to individual properties in proportion to the relative special benefit conferred on the property'"
MEASURING AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL BENEFIT
The Court in Tiburon acknowledged the difficulty of trying to precisely assign and measure special benefit, stating, "Any attempt to classify special benefits conferred on particular properties ond to assign relotive weights to those benefits will necessorily involve some degree of imprecision." The Court in Tiburon went on to say that a formula assigning equal weight to different special benefits "moy be a tegolly justifioble approach to meosuring and opportioning speciol benefits, [but] it,s nof necessorily the only volid opprooch. Whichever approoch is token to meosuring ond apportioning speciol benefits, however, it must be both defensible and consistently applied'" City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 5{]INBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The work and improvements proposed to be undertaken by the City and the cost thereof paid from the continuation of the annual assessment provide special benefit to parcels within the Districts as defined in the Method of Assessment herein. Consistent with the Act, the Districts' work and improvements are generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, sidewalks, monuments, statuary, fountains, water quality ponds, park facilities, open space, bike trails, walkways, drainage swales, other ornamental structures and facilities, entry signage, street pavers, art work, and monuments, as well as all necessary appurtenances, labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment, as applicable, for property owned or maintained by the City. Any plans and specifications for these improvements have been filed with the City and are incorporated herein by reference.
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinaryand usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. b) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. c) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. d) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graff iti.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of:
a) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.
b) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.
Plans and Specifications forthe improvements are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Engineer's Report. The Plans and Specifications for each District are on file with the City and are available for public inspection.
lncluded is a separate but integral tool: the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District lmprovement plan ("lmprovement Plan"). lt is a separate planning document that identifies the type of upcoming improvements (e.g. re-landscaping a corridor or painting a wall); the estimated cost; any installments required for short-term (less than five years) and/or long term (not greater than 30 years) improvements, and the approximate schedule for completion of the improvements. The City intends to continually update and revise the lmprovement Plan throughout each year to reflect the current status of improvement projects, budget updates and/or changes in priorities'
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 5(]INBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
The concept of the lmprovement Plan arose from the City's commitment to comply with the requirements of the Act as well as produce a valuable instrument that enables the City to schedule, prioritize, and plan for needed maintenance and servicing improvements in the districts. lt also serves as a user-friendly means for members of the public to review and understand the use of the assessment revenues generated from each District.
The assessment proceeds from each District will be exclusively used for improvements within that District plus incidental expenses. Reference is made to Section 4 - Estimate of Costs and Budgets, Section 7 - Budgets, and the additional plans and specifications, including District specific expenditure and improvement plans, which are on file with the City.
3.1 Description of lmprovements
The following are descriptions of the improvements for each of the Districts.
AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians, corridors, and open spaces. . Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. o Maintenance of irrigation system, entry fountain, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Sign rehabilitation and ladder fuel removal'
Future I mprovement Projects:
r Waterfall pumps, autofill, filters, and chlorination system. o Waterfall pond liner (concrete and other).
AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.2
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Paint and replace streetlight poles.
AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.3
. Purchase of electric power.
o Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. r Maintenance of landscaping, open space, lighting, signs, sidewalk and walls, waterfalls, including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, and signs.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 7CINBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Landscapelmprovements,
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Centralized irrigation controller upgrade.
o Signage replacement.
o Mystic Hills replacement of missing landscape'
r Waterfall rock repair,
r Baldwin Dam path repair.
o Tree and landscape improvements (or replacements).
o American River Canyon Drive/Canyon Falls (Cascade perimeter) landscaping, remove/replace trees, mow band replacement.
o Main Walking Trail landscaping, irrigation, stairs and clean up.
BLUE RAVINE OAKS AND BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO.2
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from City.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls, and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Treeremoval/replacement.
o Blue Ravine Road wall repair
o Riley Street fence replacement.
o Signage rePlacement.
BRIGGS RANCH
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, walls, fences, open space area, signage, and streetlights.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 8CINBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Shrub and tree upgrades (Blue Ravine Road/East Natoma Street). o Fence/wall repair/replacement'
r Fence repair/replacement (East Natoma Street partial). o Petstations repair/replacement.
o Bollardrepair/replacement.
o Fence repair/replacement (Blue Ravine Road partial)'
. Entry sign replacement (brass lettering).
o lrrigation upgrades/replacement (three controllers)'
o Landscape lighting upgrades or replacement'
r Tree and landscape improvements (partial collection).
BROADSTONE AND BROADSTONE NO.4
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, sound walls, water quality ponds, and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Finish Year 1 tree pruning / removal.
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Landscape light repair/replacement (60 lights)'
o Tree and landscape improvements (panial fund collection)' o Bollardrepair/replacement.
o Light pole/fixture replacement of KW'
. Repair irrigation, replace shrubs (lron Point Road median, Rathbone Circle, Knopfler Circle, and other interior areas).
r Tree and landscape improvements or replacements.
. Shrub replacement throughout (some irrigation repair) 28 acres, r Pet station replacement (7).
o SignagerePair/rePlacement.
e Turf removal/irrigation retrofit.
o lrrigation upgrades and flow (15 controllers)'
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report 9CINBS
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
BROADSTONE NO.3
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street light fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o LED conversion.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Paint streetlight poles (350 poles).
coBBLE HrLLS RIDGE lll REFLECTIONS ll
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, soundwalls, signage, parks, park facilities, open space, and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power from Sacramento Municipal Utility District. o Maintenance of public lighting fixtures'
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
r No planned improvement projects'
Future I mprovement Projects:
r Tree and landscape improvements or replacement'
o Turf and shrub repair/replacement (Mini park and path to Lembi Drive). r Fence repair/replacement (225 feet).
o Wall repairs and painting (628 feet).
. Shrub replacement (Glenn Drive/Oxburough Drive and Sibly Street and Corner)' e SignagerePair/rePlacement'
COBBLE RIDGE
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
e Maintenance of the irrigation system and plantings in a useful and workable condition, together with maintaining walls, and open space areas'
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape corridors.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
r No planned improvement projects'
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Fence repair/replacement and painting (340 feet)'
r Shrub replacement.
. Tubularfencerepair/replacement'
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportCINBS 10
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
. Tree and landscape improvements or replacements'
FOSOM HEIGHTS AND FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO. 2
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks, and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Open space, tree work, ladder fuel removal.
r Tree pruning.
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Ladder fuel work.
o Tree pruning and tree care in open space'
r Fence work.
e Glenn Drive wall repair.
o Tree and landscape improvements (Vierra Circle)'
r New landscape (Glenn Drive).
HANNAFORD CROSS
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, o Purchase of irrigation water and electric power for the two mini parks in a7O%/3O% (City/District) contribution (based on maintenance assignments)'
o Maintenance of irrigation system, bike trails, walkways, fences, walls, guard shack, drainage swale, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights'
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
e No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Lakeside fence repair.
. Repairs at guard shack.
r Tree pruning.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportQNBS 11
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
IAKE NATOMA SHORES
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Maintenance of irrigation system, soundwalls, signage, street pavers, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o LED conversion.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
. Signagerepair/rePlacement.
o Turf repair, irrigation upgrades.
e Tree and landscape improvements or replacement.
LOS CERROS
r Maintenance of landscape medians and corridors'
. Purchase of irrigation,water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures,
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
o Tree pruning.
o Paint street light poles.
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Ladder fuel work.
r Tree replacement.
. Upgrade irrigation controllers.
o lnstall flow package and master valve.
NATOMA STATION
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, artwork, open space areas, parks, plantings, and streetlights.
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportCINBS t2
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
. Ladder fuel work.
r Light pole rePlacement.
o Shrub and tree replacement / concrete work on turnpike' o lron Point Road shrub and tree replacement'
. Bigfoot mini park tree replacement.
r Tree replacement / wall damage on Black Diamond Drive. o Shrub and tree replacement on Blue Ravine Road.
o Tree pruning.
r Tree and landscape improvements or replacements'
. Wetland area improvements.
. Wall repair and painting (7,800 linear feet).
o Mini park replanting / bark (two parks @ 0'5 acre).
o Road paver replacement'
o Signage re?air / rePlacement
o Sidewalk repair.
o lrrigation upgrades.
r Art repair.
Union Square: A Benefit Zone within Natoma Station will be providing its own landscaping and lighting maintenance via an existing homeowner's association for Fiscal Year 2023/24'
NATOMA VALLEY
r lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, soundwalls, retaining walls, fencing and all necessary appurtenances, labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
r lnteriorlandscapeimprovements'
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning,
. Wallrepair/replacement.
PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH AND PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2
o Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportCINBS 13
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street, and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
o Year 3 tree pruning.
r Blue Ravine Road entry relandscape.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Tree and landscape replacement.
o Fence replacement.
o LED landscape lights.
o Ladder fuel removal.
o Repair damaged walls (stucco half walls).
o Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine Road'
r Landscape Replacement on Riley Street.
r Landscape Replacement on Prairie City Road.
o Landscape replacement on lron Point Road.
o Post and cable replacement.
PROSPECT RIDGE
r Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, open space areas, parks, plantings, and streetlights.
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
r Maintenance of landscape corridors.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
r No planned improvement projects.
Future I mprovement Projects:
r Tree pruning.
SIERRA ESTATES
o Maintenance of landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along Rowland Court, Dolan Court and Riley Street including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, monuments, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry monuments, and all necessary appurtenances.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportCINBS !4
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
. Purchase of water from the City.
. Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Tree replacement.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o No planned improvement projects.
SILVERBROOK
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures'
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree replacement.
o Medianrelandscaping.
STEEPLECHASE
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City'
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Year 4 tree pruning.
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Fence replacements near park.
THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON
o Maintenance landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along American River Canyon Drive and Oak Avenue including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, sound-walls, and all necessary appurtenances. o Purchase of water from San Juan Water District.
o Purchase of electric power.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportSNBS 15
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Landscapereplacement.
THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN CANYON II
o lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs, and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signage and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O23/24:
r No planned improvement projects.
Future lmprovement Projects:
r Landscapereplacement.
WITLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST AND WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO. 2 r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City'
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o Year 4 tree pruning.
o Oleander planting.
. Flow sensor.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Two flow packages and master valve installation.
. Light pole replacement (three).
o Tree pruning.
o Oleander replacement on Blue Ravine Road frontage'
. Landscape replacement on Oak Avenue'
r Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine Road'
o lrrigation controller upgrade (four controllers).
r Tree and landscape improvement or replacement.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportCINBS 15
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, entry signage, drainage way, parks, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
. Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
. Year 4 tree pruning.
o New planting around replaced signs.
Future lmprovement Projects:
o lnterior sign replacement.
WILLOW SPRINGS
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2023/24:
o No planned improvement projects.
Future I mprovement Projects:
r LED retrofits.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2O23/24 Engineer's ReportSNBS T7
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND BUDGETS
The Fiscal Year 2023/24 estimated costs of maintenance and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications of this Engineer's Report are summarized below. Refer to Section 7 - Budgets, for detailed budgets for each District.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report s65,ooo.oo Ss,zss.zs 5137,755.78567,500.00American River Canyon North
0.00 1,,529.40 8,879.407,350.00American River Canyon North No. 2 250,000.00 20,956.78 383,121.78112,165.00American River Canyon North No. 3
0.00 2,054.85 12,354.8510,300.00Blue Ravine Oaks
44,770.850.00 6,390.8538,380.00Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
0.00 17,096.52 715,389.4798,292.95Briggs Ranch
225,346.7t0.00 62,346.11163,000.00Broadstone
4L,929.6710,000.00 2,129.6729,800.00Broadstone No. 3
90,000.00 15,631.7L 489,535.71383,904.00Broadstone No.4 59,62',1,.6L0.00 LL,553.6148,068.00Cobble Hills lllReflections ll 15,669.020.00 2,407.O2L3,262.00Cobble Ridge
43,764.9228,000.00 1,,614.9214,150.00Folsom Heights
94,382.9237,000.00 7,037.9250,351.00Folsom Heights No.2 30,7L7.470.00 5,905.4724,8!2.O0Hannaford Cross
39,833.377,500.00 4,445.3727,888.00Lake Natoma Shores
76,806.r315,000.00 7,064.L354,742.00Los Cerros
40,o1,3.28 258,956.28218,943.OO 0.00Natoma Station
9,580.71 69,3L1.7r52,231.00 7,500.00Natoma Valley
62,O75.42 !40,615.4278,600.00 0.00Prairie Oaks Ranch
6,447.42 247,890.42L4!,443.O0 100,000.00Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 6,678.L5 32,698.1526,020.00 0.00Prospect Ridge
5,O73.67 29,428.6723,355.00 0.00The Residences at American River Canyon 5,071.95 28,426.9523,355.00 0.00The Residences at American River Canyon ll 2,349.25 L6,9t8.2512,069.00 2,500.00Sierra Estates
2,669.69 13,399.69L0,730.00 0.00Silverbrook
5,908.46 42,558.4629,150.00 7,500.00Steeplechase
0.00 3,t24.03 27,L24.O324,000.00Willow Creek Estates East 50,000.00 76,294.O3 150,625.0394,33L.00Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 40,000.00 1,',J,,1.54.76 250,797.76L99,643.00Willow Creek Estates South 12,755.330.00 1,755.3311,000.00Willow Springs
s3,140,445.81s710,000.00 $gst,eto.ges2,078,834.95Total lmprovement Costs lmprovement
Costs
Current Year
Projects
lncidental
Costs
Total
lmprovement
CostsDistrict
(}NBS 18
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The following section of the Engineer's Report includes an explanation of the benefits to be derived from the installation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements throughout the Districts, as well as a description of the assessment methodology used to apportion the total assessment to properties within each District.
The previous annual Engineer's Reports were prepored by a dillerent engineer of record and specific language lrom the prior yeafs Engineer's Report has been referenced to describe the Method ol Apportionment within the following section of this report.
The Districts consist of all assessor parcels within the boundaries as defined by the Assessment Diagram included with this report. Further, all assessor parcels, including all privately and publicly owned parcels, are identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers listed within the included assessment levy roll. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based on the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the Districts over and above general benefits conferred on real property orto the public at large.
The apportionment of special benefit is a two-step process: the first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements, and the second step is to allocate the assessments to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property.
5.1 Discussion of Benefit
ln summary, the assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 of the Act states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon londs within an ossessment district moy be apportioned by ony formula or method which fairly distributes the net omount omong all ossessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcelfrom the improvements."
Proposition 218, as codified in Article Xlll D of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and the assessment must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional benefit upon the assessed parcel:
"No ossessrn ent shall be imposed on any porcel which exceeds the reasonoble cost of the proportional speciol benefit conferred on thot porcel." The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential, commercial, industrial and other lots and parcels resulting from the improvements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These categories of special benefit are supported by various California legislation and supporting studies which describe the types of special benefit received by property from improvements such as those proposed by the Districts. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:
o Proximity to improved landscaped areas within each District. o Access to improved landscaped areas within each District.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportQNBs 19
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
. lmproved views within each District.
o Extension of property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximityto the improvements.
e Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the District and the services provided by the District, would not have been created.
The SVTA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties in three distinct areas: proximity, expanded or improved access, and views. The SVTA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel, and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SVTA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park improved by an assessment:
The characterization of o benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives o direct odvantoge from the improvement (e.g. proximity to o park) or receives on indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall pubtic benefits of the improvement (e.9. generol enhoncement of the district's property values).
Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed above, further strengthen the basis ofthese assessments.
The special benefits from the improvements are further detailed below.
PROXIMITY TO IMPROVED TANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE DISTRICT Only the specific properties within close proximity to the improvements are included in each District.
Therefore, property in each District enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the improvements that the public at large and property outside of each District do not share. ln absence of the assessments, the improvements would not be provided and the landscaping areas within each District would be degraded due to insufficient funding for maintenance, upkeep and repair.
Therefore, the assessments provide improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity and access enjoyed by parcels in the Districts, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property within each District.
ACCESS TO IMPROVED LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE DISTRICT Since the parcels in each District are the only parcels that enjoy close access to the improvements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas that are provided by the assessments. This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in that District.
IMPROVED VIEWS WITHIN THE DISTRICT
The Districts, by maintaining these landscaped areas, provides improved views to properties in each District. The properties in a District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the improvements. Therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon the property within each District.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportQNBS 20
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
EXTENSION OF A PROPERTY'S OUTDOOR AREAS AND GREEN SPACES FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN CLOSE
PROXIMITY TO THE IMPROVEMENTS
ln large part, because it is generally cost prohibitive to provide large open land areas in development projects, the residential, commercial and other benefiting properties in each District do not have large outdoor areas and green spaces. The landscaped areas within each District provide additional outdoor areasthat serve as an effective extension of the land area for propertiesthat are in close proximitytothe improvements. The improvements, therefore, provide an important, valuable and desirable extension of usable land area, which confers a direct advantage and special benefit to properties in close proximity to the improvements.
CREATION OF INDIVIDUAT LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE THAT, IN ABSENCE OF THE
ASSESSMENTS, WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CREATED
Typically, the original owner/developer of the property within the Districts can petition the City to establish the assessment districts. As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through the Department of Real Estate "White Paper" reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. The purchase of property was also an "agreement" to pay the assessment. ln absence of the assessments, the lots within the Districts would probably not have been subdivided and created. These lots, and the improvements they support, are a special benefit to the property owners.
5.2 General versus Special Benefit
The assessments from the Districts are used to fund improvements and increased levels of maintenance to the grounds adjoiningthe properties in the Districts. ln absence of those Districts, such improvements would not be provided and the properties would not have been subdivided and improved to the same extent. The Districts were specifically proposed for formation to provide additional and improved improvements, and services in the Districts. ln absence of the assessments, these public resources could not be created and revenues would not be available for their continued maintenance and improvement' Therefore, the assessments solely provide special benefit to property in the Districts over and above the general benefits conferred by the general facilities of the City.
Although these improvements may be available to the general public at large because the Districts are accessible by members of the public, the improvements within each District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for property inside the Districts, and not the public at large. Other properties that are either outside the Districts or within the Districts and not assessed, do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. These improvements are of special benefit to properties located within the Districts because they provide a direct advantage to properties in the Districts that would not be provided in absence of the assessments.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and LightingDistricts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report(]lNBS 21
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
5.3 Quantification of General Benefit
Although the analysis used to support these assessments concludes that the benefits are solely special, as described above, consideration is made for the suggestion that a portion of the benefits are general.
General benefits cannot be funded by District assessments and the.funding must come from other sources.
The maintenance and servicing of the improvements is also partially funded, directly and indirectly from other sources including the City, the County of Sacramento and the State of California. This funding comes in the form of grants, development fees, special programs, and general funds, as well as direct maintenance and servicing of facilities (e.g. curbs, gutters, streets, drainage systems, and other infrastructure maintenance items such as pond clean outs and street sweeping, etc.). This funding from other sources more than compensates for general benefits, if any, received by the properties within the Districts.
STEP 1: CAICUIATION OF THE GENERAL BENEFIT
The general benefits from the assessment may be quantified as illustrated in the following table.
Calculation of General Benefit {11
Benefit Factor Relative Weieht
GeneralBenefit
Contribution
Relative General
Benefit
Creation of parcels
Multi-Family Residential
Commercial
90 0%
70%
20%
0.0 0.5
1.0 5
5 100
Total Calculated General Benefit
1_.5
L.s%
(1) Perthe prior Engineer's Report.
As a result, the City will contribute at least 1.5% of the total budget from sources other than the assessment. The contribution offsets any general benefits from the assessment services.
STEP 2: CALCULATION OF CURRENT GENERAL BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION FROM CIW pursuant to the prior Engineer's Report, the overall general benefit contribution is the sum of the following components:
The City owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Districts improvements. This curb and gutter maintenance serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the City toward general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb gutter is conservatively estimated lo be 1%.
The City owns and maintains storm drainage systems along the border of the Districts improvements. This system serves to prevent flooding and associated damage to the improvements, and manage urban runoff, including local pollutants loading from the improvements. The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance, and operation of the local storm drainage systems is conservatively estimated to be 1%.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportQNBS 22
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
The City owns and maintains local public streets along the border of the Districts improvements. These public streets provide access to the improvements for its enjoyment as well as efficient maintenance. The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance of local public streets is conservatively estimated to contribute 1%.
The improvements were constructed by the original owner/developer(s) as a condition of development.
The value of the construction of the improvements can be quantified and monetized as an annuity' Since this construction was performed and paid by non-assessment funds, this "annuity" can be used to offset general benefit costs and is conservatively estimated to contribute 25%.
Therefore, the total general benefit that is conservatively quantified al1'.5% is more than offset by the total non-assessment contribution towards general benefit of 28%.
5.4 Method of Apportionment
The second step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property.
This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE). This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are assigned a SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling which is assigned one SFE.
5.5 AssessmentApportionment
The improved properties within the Districts consist primarily of single family, multi-family, commercial and non-assessed parcels, with the vast majority being single family parcels. Since all single family parcels in the Districts are deemed to have good proximity to the improvements, such single family properties receive similar benefit from the proposed improvements and are assigned 1.0 SFE unit. The special benefit assignment for other types of properties is further defined as follows.
Many of the Districts contain only single family residences and non-assessed properties such as parks and green spaces. These Districts are:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report !,022American River Canyon North
160American River Canyon North No. 2
'J,,O22American River Canyon North No. 3(1)
165Blue Ravine Oaks
155Blue Ravine Oaks ll
389Cobble Hills Ridge lll Reflections ll
98Cobble Ridge
308Folsom Heights
308Folsom Heights No. 2
103Hannaford Cross
Residential LotsDistrict
CINBS 23
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
113Lake Natoma Shores
337Los Cerros
79Natoma Valley
35Prospect Ridge
25Sierra Estates
154Steeplechase
77The Residences at American River Canyon
10The Residences at American River Canyon ll
747Willow Creek East
747Willow Creek East No. 2(2)
517Willow Springs
Residential LotsDistrict
(1) See the American River Canyon No. 3 section below for further information on zones of benefit.
(2) See the Willow Creek East No. 2 section below for further information on zones of benefit.
Single family residential properties in the aforementioned Districts are assigned 1.0 SFE per parcel and condominiums are assigned 0.67 SFEs per residential unit. District properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
(1) ln 2OO5/07, a general case SFE rate was established for condominiums in Districts in which the original Engineer's Report did not anticipate condominium development. The rate is 0'67 SFEs per unit.
AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.3
There are 1,022 residential lots in American River Canyon North No. 3. Each assessable parcel receives a special and direct benefit from the improvements in the District. Since the District is comprised of residential single family improved properties and all properties have good proximity to the improvements, all assessable parcels are estimated to benefit equally from the improvements associated with the District, and the costs associated with the improvements are apportioned equally to all parcels on the basis of current or proposed dwelling units. Each parcel is assigned SFE units relative to the number of current or proposed dwelling units on the parcel.
There are three Zones of Benefit within American River Canyon North District No. 3. ln Zone A each single family parcel is assigned 1.00 SFE, in Zone B, each single family parcel is assigned 0.83 SFE, and in Zone C each single family parcel is assigned 0.50 SFE. Properties in Zone B and Zone C receive lower benefit units because they currently pay for common open space areas within their zone. h 2A07, when the American River Canyon North District No. 3 was formed, an analysis of the associated landscaping improvements was performed to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. lt was estimated that City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
0.6700Condominiu'1{t) (per unit)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land, etc.)
SFEsDescription
CINBS 24
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Zone B receives t7% of the special benefit, and Zone C receives 50% of the special benefit. Therefore, the SFE units for Zone B and Zone C have been adjusted accordingly. American River Canyon North District No' 3 properties are assessed per the table below:
American River CanYon No. 3
BR]GGS RANCH
There are 642 residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE. Non-residential parcels within Briggs Ranch (APNs: 071-1190-007, -OO8, -O1lO, -012, -013, and -01.4) are assigned 2.20 SFEs per acre, per the original formation documents. Briggs Ranch properties are assessed per the table below:
Briggs Ranch
BROADSTONE
According to the Method of Spread in Broadstone's original formation documents, there were 895.30L original acres in Broadstone. Of this original acreage, 416.145 acres subdivided into 1,530 single family residential lots (average of 4.2 lots per acre) and 479.156 acres divided into multi-family and commercial lots. The multi-family parcels are designated into two development areas; Bentley Square West and Bentley Square East. Bentley Square West (APNs O72-1O70-002-0000 through APN 072-1070-100-0000) includes 99 units and Bentley Square East (APNs 072-1670-001-0000 through APN 072-1610-053-0000) includes 53 units. The 152 Bentley Square units are each assigned 0.096 SFEs per unit. Due to the small lot density being consistent with the multi-family land use designation, the Vessona and Halidon developments are considered condominiums. These projects are consistent with both the Multi-Family Low Density General Plan Land Use Designation and the Multi-Family zoning of the project site. Parcels within the Vessona and Halidon developments are assigned 0.67 SFEs per unit.
There are 1-,530 single family residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE. Developed non- single family parcels within Broadstone are assigned 2.10 SFEs per acre, unrecorded single family residential lots are assigned 0.65 SFEs per parcel, and undeveloped non-single family residential parcels are assigned 0.704 SFEs per acre. Broadstone properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
1.0000Zone A - Original American River Canyon North Area (per parcel)
0.8300Zone B - Canyon Falls Village Area (per parcel)
0.5000Zone C - American River Canyon North No. 2 Area (per parcel) SFEsDescription
L.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
2.2000Non-Residential Parcel (per acre)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs
(jINBS 25
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Broadstone
BROADSTONE NO.3
According to the Method of Spread in Broadstone No. 3's original formation documents there were 559.36 acres in Broadstone No. 3. Of this acreage, 325.00 acres are single family residential lots (average of 2'034 lots per acrel,2O7.43 acres are industrial, commercial and other uses, and 26.93 acres are non-assessed for use as parks, open space, etc.
There are 523 single family residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE. Developed non- single family parcels within Broadstone No. 3 are assigned 2.034 SFEs per acre, unrecorded single family residential lots are assigned 0.326 SFEs per parcet, and undeveloped non-single family residential parcels are assigned 0.663 SFEs per acre. Broadstone No. 3 properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Broadstone No. 3
BROADSTONE NO.4
Residential
Certain residential properties in Broadstone No. 4 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned one 1.00 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. lf there is more than one single family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.00 SFE per single family detached dwelling. properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties' These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit' City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
0.6500Unrecorded Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
0.0960Bentley Square Multi-Family Parcel (per parcel)
0.6700Vessona and Halidon Condominium (per unit)
2.1000Developed Non-single Family Parcel (per acre)
0.7040Undeveloped Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc')
Description SFEs
1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
0.3260Unrecorded Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
2.0340Developed Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre)
0.6530Undeveloped Non-single Family Parcel (per acre)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
CINBS 26
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Broadstone No' 4, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties.
Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2OL0 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.91persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.12 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.91people on average for a single family residence and 2.t2 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit' A similar calculation is used for the SFE assignments for other residential property types. Broadstone No' 4 residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Broadstone No. 4 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units'
Commercial/lndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property' The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties. ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.91. Since the average lot size for a single family home in Broadstone No. 4 is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.
The employee density per acre is generally 1-.65 times the population density of single family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 14.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial/ industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident, This factor of equivalence of benefit between L resident to 4.8 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report L.00 1.00001.00Single Family Residential
0.4000o.73 0.55Condominium
o.42 o.27000.64Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex
o.22000.54 0.34Multi-Family Residential (5+ Units;{t)
0.45 0.45 0.2000Mobile Home on Separate Lot
Pop. Density
Equivalent
SqFt
Factor
SFE
FactorType of Residential
{]INBS 27
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category' Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres. lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Broadstone No. 4 non-residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Broadstone No. 4 Commercia/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (1) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above.
Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property' A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to improvements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel' The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property' A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property' Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.500 0.s00024Commercial
t.420068 \.420Office
0.500 0.500024Shopping Center
0.500024 0.500Office
o.o2t N/ATSelf Storage or Parking Lot
0.033 N/A0.80Golf Course
N/A0.10 0.004Cemeteries
.0002 N/A0.05Agriculture
Type of Commercial/lndustrial
Property
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre(1)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5
(3lNBs 2a
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.
Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.
Other property land uses in Broadstone No. 4 are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Broadstone No. 4 Other Property Assessment Factors
Zones of Benefit
ln 2015, when Broadstone No. 4 was formed, an analysis was performed of the associated lighting and landscaping improvements to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. As a result, four Zones of Benefit were created within Broadstone No. 4. Parcels in Zone B are determined to receive 95.25% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 93.87% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, and parcels in Zone D are determined to receive 92.23% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A'
NATOMA STATION
There are 1,271 single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1 SFEs. There are 94.99 acres of Commercial and each one is assign ed 4.2487 SFEs per acre, with the exception of those properties originally located within Lot X. There are 21.03 acres of Multi Family and each one is assigned 3.2337 SFEs per acre.
There are L,27! single family residential lots within Natoma Station and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. Condominium parcels are assigne d O.67 SFEs per unit, multi-family parcels are assigned 3.2337 SFEs per acre, commercial properties located outside of Lot X are assigned 4.2487 SFEs per acre, commercial properties within Lot X are assigned 0.6299 SFEs per parcel. Natoma Station properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.2500Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
QNBS 29
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Natoma Station
(1) lncludes APNs:072-0840-045, -047 and a portion of -O57.
PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH
There are 855 single family residential lots within Prairie Oaks Ranch and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. The one multi-family property is assigned 57.0 SFEs and the school site is assigned 5.53 SFEs to pay for the cost of maintaining the school sites' frontage. Prairie Oaks Ranch properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Prairie Oaks Ranch
PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO.2
Residential
Certain residential properties in Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned 1.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single-family residential property. lf there is more than one single-family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.0 SFE per single-family detached dwelling.
Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single- family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single-family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit.
The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2019 ACS 5 Year estimate and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2'66 persons occupy each single-family residence, whereas an average of 1.94 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.56 people on average for a single-family residence and 1.94 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
1.0000Single Family Parcel (per Parcel)
0.6700Condominium Parcel (per unit)
3.2337Multi-Family Parcel (per acre)
4.2487Commercial Parcel Excluding Lot X (per acre)
0.6299Lot X Commercial Parcel(l)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc')
Description SFEs
1.0000Single Family Parcel (per Parcel)
57.0000Multi-Family Parcel (per Parcel)
5.6300School Site Parcel (per Parcel)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc')
SFEsDescription
QNBS 30
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of O.42 per dwelling unit. Should ADUs be developed within Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, the assessment would be 1 SFE for the primary SFR and .42 f or the ADU. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types. Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units'
Commercial/lndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single-family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property.
The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties. ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, Census data shows that the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.66. Since the average lot size for a single-family home in Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 13.30.
The employee density per acre is generally 1.80 times the population density of single-family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 13.30 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category.
Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
1.00 1.00 1.0000Single Family Residential
0.58 0.4200o.73Condominium
0.3200o.77 o.42Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex
0.30 o.2200o.72Multi-Family Residential (5+ Unit5;trt
0.25000.58 0.43Mobile Home on Separate Lot
of Residential Property
SqFt
Factor
SFE
Factor
Pop. Density
valent
GNBS 31
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre forthe first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres. lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed atthe appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Prairie Oaks Ranch No.2 non- residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Commercia/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (1) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above.
Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and -15% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property' Using this ratio, the sFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.
Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property,
Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.500 0.500024Commercial
1..420058 t.420Office
0.500 0.500024Shopping Center
0.500024 0.500Office
N/A0.o2rLSelf Storage or Parking Lot
0.033 N/A0.80Golf Course
N/A0.10 0.004Cemeteries
0.002 N/A0.05Agriculture
Type of CommerciaUlndustrial
PropertY
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre(1)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5
GINBS 32
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Other property land uses in Prairie Oaks No.2 are assessed perthe original formation documents, perthe table below:
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Other Property Assessment Factors
SILVERBROOK
The non-residential properties in Silverbrook are assigned 1.0 SFE per acre and the remaining 273 single family residential lots within Silverbrook are assigned 0.1259 SFEs per residential lot. Silverbrook properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Silverbrook
(1) Based on 34.39 acres that developed into 273 single family parcels.
WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2
Residential
Certain residential properties in Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned 1.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single-family residential property. lf there is more than one single-family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.0 SFE per single-family detached dwelling.
Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single- family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single-family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit.
The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.91 persons occupy each single-family residence, whereas an average of 2.I2 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2'9t people on average for a single-family residence and 2.12 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0'40 per dwelling unit. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types' Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 residential properties are assessed perthe original formation documents, perthe table below:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.2500Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
1.0000Non-Residential Parcel (per acre)
0.1259Single Family Parcel (per parcel)(1)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc')
SFEsDescription
{GlNBS 33
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units an d 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units.
Commercial/l ndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single-family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property' The SFE values forvarious commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties. ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, Census data shows that the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.91 Since the average lot size for a single-family home in Prospect Ridge is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.
The employee density per acre is generally 1.65 times the population density of single-family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / t4.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefitto commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category' Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios)' As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre forthe first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres. lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Willow Creek Estates East No' 2 non- residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report L.00001.001.00Single Family Residential
0.55 0.40000.73Condominium
0.27000.64 o.42Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex
0.34 o.2200o.64Multi-Family Residential (5+ Unit5l{tt
0.20000.45 0.45Mobile Home on Separate Lot
Pop. Density
Equivalent
SqFt
Factor
SFE
Factorof Residential Pro
(CNBS 34
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Commercial/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (L) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above' Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75%o are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property' Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.
Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned proPerty.
Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.
Other property land uses in Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.500 0.s00024Commercial
1.420068 7.420Office
0.500 0.500024Shopping Center
0.500024 0.500Office
o.o2t N/A1Self Storage or Parking Lot
N/A0.80 0.033Golf Course
N/A0.0040.10Cemeteries
0.002 N/A0.05Agriculture
Type of
Commercial/lndustrial PropertY
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre{1)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5
{]rNBS 35
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Other Property Assessment Factors Zones of Benefit
As part of the engineering work for this assessment, an analysis was conducted on the relationship (including proximity, level of service, etc.), between properties and the primary improvements located throughout Willow Creek Estates East No. 2. Parcels in Zone A (on Garrett Drive, Ferrera Drive and Whitmer Drive) receive direct special benefit from the proximate landscaping and trees adjacent to the properties as well as less proximate streetlighting. Parcels in Zone B receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting as well as landscaping particularly along the street entrances into the neighborhood. Parcels in Zone C receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting but less benefit from the landscaping because they are less proximate to the landscaped areas.
Thus, three zones (A, B, and C) were created. Parcels in Zone A are determined to receive same level of the level of special benefit of those within Zone B and parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 9I.92% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A and Zone B'
WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH
There are 1,101 single family residential lots within Willow Creek Estates South's Villages 1, 2, 3 (lots 1-40 and 94-154), 4 through 7, and 9A and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. There are 243 single family residential lots in Villages 8, 9b and 9c and each residential lot is assigned 1.086 SFEs. There are 64 single family residential lots in Village 3 (lots 4L-93 and 155-165) and each one is assigned 1.255 SFEs.
Additionally, there are L3 Lexington Business Park parcels assigned 0.618 SFEs per parcel and three Lexington Square parcels assigned 2.47t0 SFEs per parcel. Willow Creek Estates South properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
Willow Creek Estates South
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report
0.2500Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g.open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs
1.0000Single Family Parcel Villages !,2,3 (Lots 1-40 and 94-1541, 4 through 7, and 9A (per parcel)
1.0860Single Family Parcel Villages 8, 9b and 9c (per parcel)
1.2560Single Family Parcel Village 3 (lots 41-93 and 155-165) (per parcel)
0.6180Lexington Business Park Parcel (per parcel)
2.4710Lexington Square Parcel (per parcel)
0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land, etc')
SFEsDescription
QNBS 36
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
FIETDSTONE MEADOWS
On April g,2Ot3 by Resolution No. 9137, the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District was dissolved. The City will no longer be responsible for maintaining the improvements nor providing services within the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District'
5.6 Maximum Assessment Increase
Annually, the maximum assessment rates for Broadstone No. 3 and Cobble Ridge are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with no maximum annual adjustment.
The maximum assessment rates for Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, and Willow Creek Estates East No' 2 are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 4%.
The maximum assessment rates for American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Broadstone No. 4, Folsom Heights No. 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 3%'
Any change in the Consumer Price lndex in excess of the maximum annual assessment increase shall be cumulatively reserved as the "Unused CPl" and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less lhan 4% for Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, and Willow Creek Estates East No. 2. The "Unused CPl" shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than 3% for American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Broadstone No. 4, Folsom Heights No. 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2'
5.7 Fiscal Year 2O23l24Maximum Assessment
The Fiscal Year 2023/24 maximum authorized and proposed assessment rates are shown below No lnflatorStoz.s4 sro2.e4American River Canyon North
No lnflator77.70 55.48American River CanYon North No. 2 271.22 CPI NTE 3%303.84American River Canyon North No. 3
74.86 No lnflator278.60Blue Ravine Oaks
0.00 CPI NTE 3%107.70Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
722.28 No lnflator122.28Briggs Ranch
154.98 No lnflator164.99Broadstone
40.84 cPr40.84Broadstone No. 3
CPI NTE 3%4t.1641..17Broadstone No. 4-Zone A
39.20 CPI NTE 3%39.2LBroadstone No.4-Zone B
FY 2023124
Maximum
Authorized Rate
FY 2023124
Proposed Rate
Maximum
Assessment
lnflatorDistrict
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report{jINBS 37
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
CPI NTE 3%38.65 38.64Broadstone No.4-Zone C
CPI NTE 3%37.91 37.90Broadstone No. 4-Zone D
No lnflatorr13.1.4 1r3.1.4Cobble Hills lllReflections ll cPt25r.22 139.48Cobble Ridge
No lnflator70.88 70.88Folsom Heights
CPI NTE 3%234.55 208.58Folsom Heights No, 2
195.78 No lnflator195.78Hannaford Cross
No lnflator183.58 183.58Lake Natoma Shores
No lnflator121.78 r2r.78Los Cerros
No lnflator9I.7I 97.70Natoma Station
CPI NTE 4%t,o\2.06 877.36Natoma Valley
No lnflator2L3.61. 213.60Prairie Oaks Ranch
333.02 CPI NTE 3%333.02Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
CPI NTE 4%1,259.83 t,269.82Prospect Ridge
429.78 CPI NTE 4%429.79Sierra Estates
132.27 No lnflator132.32Silverbrook
L57.68 No lnflator157.68Steeplechase
728.24 CPI NTE 4%728.24The Residences at American River Canyon L,512.50 CPI NTE 4%1,512.50The Residences at American River Canyon ll
80.40 No lnflator80.40Willow Creek Estates East
LO1.64 CPI NTE 4%107.65Willow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone A&B
98.96 CPI NTE 4%98.96Willow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone C
109.87 No lnflator109.88Willow Creek Estates South
28.I4 No lnflator28.74Willow Springs
FY 2023/24
Maximum
Authorized Rate
Maximum
Assessment
lnf latorDistrict P
FY 2023124
ed Rate
Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the cost estimate and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per benefit point will be based on the estimated costs, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and operational condition. The actual assessment amount may be equal to or lower than the maximum allowable assessmeng however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 21-8.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report{$NBS 38
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
6. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of the Districts are displayed on the following Assessment Diagram. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Districts are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Sacramento, at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report' City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report &l
t
t eri
l8
1rS I
l
t'i.li
15 t Itdtb a
ldl!idge
H- H-
^^,NORTH
raeo A h€ fffd€ ff if brY ciEfix of rH[
crl) !r tBlo9. arlllr u !*:R4&16
e&*tra lBg ,--, , l*r s
i€c6&g * Td afFtt s l4 {lrr {LEFh
s ;N€ctlr !i a{v* lrnu{r.!. l.LaacEhT!
i:{rroFffh1* -.trArrF
tu4ErBh b:
tmB $igreltuErT h.t !dd&l! NrEsf!
!Y tf Flt!+r*a d rd{rl.6 rdth
k:8.+l! m{€!4fi!iq&! (€LM* nr6 sgtssx:ot,dru
ta rf _*, -- oAv ta ._ -, .,., -. - ,-.*
u F* F&! rgs tur al4 s6aastBstlol.&M i* i#isEn.a&!fd srtu YE$ ffitaE!&16SFf!tr lE i&ft&r?q{a lE a+*rrS ira.,i€{rdtd 9€ -. --,.-- -- tu,t g :inl-tiiiai:{ o *;tnr kn6 le &!tttffiDss!tr{rFB! ts E MraMt !f, b* s*5QT E\{!i&Haih* rs-ELt' lS td! rtra - ilr s ... ,di.r!hEnsnf; --___ .o:r&[ fu tHidad€G ld adrfl\ ;i@ rd af tE L'hsY, q srasxr4
5raE $ Ctug{hlA iI f* E{GSI Ftr tr!{Rrr*rl!1:# :e ld arrl f F!Lt:* .'MFy rldrt$ tt4t!g WrIa
Ps*erhdh$:
MEittrt 6dqclf M lor€ffsM161
dktr {r sEasrrul Li 4E!&EDGilxr1ffii f:4 lt€g $0 Mtuss g &r laicrt qlhft *trfr 1k!4 YS! 5N! {6€*rad {! ST6!5
ffiMd lf rMisq€rd{at f trnFmfiit
hGP^Eir S SifED {r S Wt 8i tlB
dir{?rd r!!e!9D09!F&g! sff
crw oF FoLsoM
LAIIDSCAPII-IG ANO LIGHIING ASSESSMEiIT DISTRICTS
ASSESSIIENT DIAGRAilI
r}NBS 39
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
7 I BUDGETS
The Fiscal Year 2O23/24 budgets for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in Section 3 - Plans and Specifications of this report are shown below.
GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS
. Scheduled: monthly landscape maintenance and service. . Unscheduled: unscheduled but potential costs for repairs (i.e. broken sprinklers and irrigation systems), replacements (i.e. remove and replace dead tree or irrigation controller), and other services (i.e. repair fence post or treat for a specific pest) not included in monthly maintenance and service costs.
r streetlights: repair and replace bulbs and ballasts in streetlights.
SERVICE COSTS
r Electrical: electric costs for streetlight maintenance and power to irrigation controllers. o Water: water costs to irrigate landscaping.
CURRENT YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Funded capital improvements planned to occur in the upcoming fiscal year.
INCIDENTAT COSTS
r professional Services: consultant cost for Engineer's Report and lmprovement Plan' r Contract Services: other contracts or professional services such as backflow testing (yearly tests), vector control, graffiti removal, and streetlight pole replacement' r Publications/Mailings/Communications: yearly notices in public hearings, mailings to Advisory Committee Members, and telephone expenses.
r Staff: Landscaping and Lighting District Manager and/or inspector, clerical support, and/or other city staff.
o Overhead: General overhead (Districts share of general overhead categories such as City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager, etc.) and Department overhead (Districts share of department overhead categories such as City Attorney, City Clerk and Finance Dept' Costs)' r County Auditor Fee: Per Parcel Fee charged by County to put levy on tax bills.
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS
This is the total of all improvement costs budgeted for the upcoming year. This cost includes current improvements that are funded by fund balance monies. Fund balance monies are monies that have been collected in prior years in anticipation of being used for specific improvements and/or intended for replacement or improvement of capital items within a district.
RESERVE FUND COLLECTION / (CONTRIBUTION)
This item includes the amount to be collected from or credited to the annual assessment' When the total lmprovement Costs exceed the total maximum assessment revenue to be collected, and there are sufficient City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's Report(DNBs 40
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
reserves, a credit may be applied to the total annual costs. When the total lmprovement Costs are less than the total maximum assessment revenue, an amount may be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessment collections from the County, whichever is later.
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER SOURCES
This item includes any amount contributed to the District from any source of funds other than the annual assessments.
ROUNDING ADJUSTMENT
This item includes any amount necessary to round the actual assessment amount for each parcel to an even cent as the County requires that the total levy amount submitted be even so that the amount can be divided into two equal installments on the tax roll.
BALANCE TO ASSESS DISTRICT PROPERTIES
This calculation takes the number of single-family equivalent benefit units and multiplies it by the amount that each property within a district will be assessed for the upcoming year. This is the total assessment amount that will be generated by the properties within each district.
RESERVE FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS
This calculation determines funds available in a district. This calculation includes the included funds remaining after being allocated to the estimated reserves, short-term installments and long-term installments.
ESTIMATED RESERVES
Estimated reserve needed for the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessment collections from the County, whichever is later'
SHORT-TERM INSTALLMENTS
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within the next five years.
LONG-TERM INSTATTMENTS
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within five to thirty years.
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2023/24 Engineer's ReportT}NBS 41
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
American River Canyon North
Fiscaf Year 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Sign Rehab, Ladder Fuel Removal
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 31,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
So.oo
0.00 13,500.00
L1,000.00
17,000.00
26,000.00
65,000.00
s132,500.00
s1,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 3,728.00
527.78
Ss,zss.z8
5t37,755.78
705,204.68
(32,551.10)
0.00 s105,204.68
S1o2.s4
5to2.94
r,022
t,o22.oo
(s17,2s8.02)
(48,503.85)
(26,351.00)
lssz,t22.87l
0.00 (32.551.10)
15124,673.971
so.oo
20,528.00
0.00 5,833.00
s26,361.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term Installment Summary
Project
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
Waterfall Pond Liner (Concreate and Other)
Waterfall Pumps, Autofill, Filters, Chlorination System Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
lnstallment Summary
American River Canyon North
2023-24
Yearly
tnstalhBent
PriorYearc
Cslleetions
Year 1
mla
YeanL
20tr8
S3,933
52,500
Year 2
2019
Yers2-5
20lS-2tr,2j2
s13,332
Slo,ooo
Year 3
agm
Y,ear 5-tr'0
2{l23t20x27
s16,665
s12,s00
Year4
m2t
Years 10-20
m2&zogv
Sgg,3go
$25,ooo
Vear5
min
5o
Years 20-!3tl
N*m47
s33,330
s2s,o00
Approt,
TotalReqdred
Appr"o&
ToralReqriled
Sloo,ooo
Szs,ooo
so 5o
PrtorYears
Collectbm
Srs,ozs
S2,5oo
$o so $o $oso
Yearly
lnstallmer.rt
s3,333
s2,5oo
ss,ggg $20,528 s5,833 s23,332 s29,165 s58,330 s58,330 s175,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
American River Canyon North No. 2
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 31,2023),
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
so.oo
0.00 7,000.00
N/A
350.00
0.00 0.00
s7,35o.oo
51,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
0.00 424.0O
105.40
S1,529.40
s8,879.40
12,432.00
0.00 (2.60)
$8,876.80
sss.48
$tt.to
L60
160.00
5L77,967.39
(5,919.60)
(143,588.00)
528,259.79
0.00 0.00
528,259.79
So.oo
133,688.00
0.00 L0,000.00
s143,688.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term Installment Summary
Prolet
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Paint Light Poles (Approximately 250 Poles)
Pole Replacement
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Installment Summary
American River Canyon North No. 2
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
Prior Years
Collectiions
Year 1
2018
Year I
zo18
52,ooo
Ss,ooo
Year 2
2019
Years,2€
mt9-2o22
s8,ooo
s32,000
Year3
2{r:m
Years 5-10
2A2t-20'27
slo,ooo
S40,ooo
Yeor4
zim
Years tr0-20
2lI,f,"zo,3-l
s20,oo0
580,ooo
Year5
2922
so
Years 2O-30
2es8.m47
s2o,ooo
s80,oo0
Appror
T@lReSuired
so
Approx.
Total Required
s60,ooo
S240,ooo
so so So So soSo
Yearly
lrstdl,ment
S2,ooo
s8,oo0
Prior Years
Collections
$sg,sgz
574,L}t
s1O,O00 $133,588 S1O,0OO S40,OOO s50,000 s100,000 stoo,ooo 5300,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
American River Canyon North No. 3
FiscalYear 2023124 €ost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Landscape lm provements
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance AnalYsis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3'J,, 20231
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance {June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
s58,515.00
50,000.00
0.00 3,300.00
350.00
0.00 250.000.00
$362,165.00
s1,000.00
0.00 0.00
1.5,351.00
4,078.00
527.78
s20,956.78
s383,121.78
279,399.48
(L33,722.30)
0.32 s249,399.80
s271.22
$303.8s
'J,,022
919.56
St,066,z3z.o3
188,747.85)
(482,000.001
s495,484.18
(30,000.00)
ft03.722.301
$3St,ZSt.gg
SEo,ooo.oo
420,000.00
9,000.00
23,000.00
s482,000.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
lrrigation Controller Upgrade - Centralized (1 Controller) Signage Replacement
Mystic Hills-Replace Missing Landscape
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals;
Installment Summary
American River Canyon North No. 3
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
S4,ooo
S3,ooo
s2,ooo
s9,oo0
Prior Years
Collections
Sq,ooo
s16,ooo
$to,ooo
S30,ooo
Year 1
20L8
s4,ooo
53,ooo
$z,ooo
s9,o0o
Year 1
2018
s1,ooo
Ss,ooo
Ss,ooo
Year 2
2019
S4,ooo
S3,ooo
S2,ooo
s9,ooo
Years 2-5
2At9-2022
$4,ooo
Szo,ooo
s20,oo0
Year 3
2020
s4,000
S3,ooo
Sz,ooo
s9,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
S5,ooo
$25,ooo
s2s,oo0
Year 4
2021
s4,0oo
Ss,ooo
S2,ooo
s9,ooo
Years 10-20
2028-2037
s10,oo0
$5o,ooo
ss0,oo0
Year 5
2022
s4,ooo
S3,ooo
s2,ooo
Se,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
Sls,ooo
Soo,ooo
s2s,ooo
Sloo,ooo
Yearly
lnstallment
Sr,ooo
Ss,ooo
55,000
Prior Years
Collections
s13,000
S65,ooo
s65,ooo
Years 20-30
2038-2047
s10,oo0
S5o,ooo
s50,oo0
Approx.
Total Required
S75,ooo
s3so,ooo
s3oo,0oo
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Waterfall Rock Repair
Daldwin Dam Path Repair
Tree and Landscape lmprovements or Replacement
ARC Drive / Canyon Falls (Cascade Perimeter), Landscape, Remove, Replace Trees, Mow Band Replacement
Main Walking Trail Landscaping, lrrigation, Stairs, Clean- Up
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
s2,000 s165,000 s2,000 sg,ooo s10,000 s20,000 s20,000 s135,ooo s10,000 s112,000 s10,oo0 s40,000 ss0,000 s100,000 s100,000 s1so,00o s23,O0O s420,000 s23,000 s92,oo0 s115,000 s23o,0oo $230,000 s1,010,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Blue Ravine Oaks
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Pu bl ications/M a i I i ngs/Com m u n ications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment Per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30, 2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
so.oo
0.00 1,200.00
0.00 2,500.00
6,500.00
s10,300.00
0.00 s1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
0.00 947.OO
107.85
s2,054.85
s12,354.85
36,069.00
0.00 (2.9s)
$12,351.90
$74.86
s218.60
165
165.00
Srss,++o.rs
(8,236.57)
(1s.000.00)
$110,203.58
0.00 0.00
s110,203.58
$0.00
10,000.00
0.00 5,000.00
$1s,ooo.oo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Froject
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
Blue Ravine Wall Repair
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Blue Ravine Oaks
2023-24
Yeaily
lnstallmefi
PriorYears
Cotlectbrs
Year 2
20t9
So so
Year 3
2N2A
Years S-trO
292*ZAi27
S25,ooo
Year 4
m2!
Years 10-2O
2023*m37
Sso,ooo
Year 5
2(n2
So
Years20-An
m38-z047
$5o,ooo
ABprox.
ToblReqtrired
Appolc
TohlRequird
Srso,ooo
Year 1
2018
Year 1
2fit3
Ss,ooo
5o so $ososo
Yeatly
lnstallm€nt
Ss,ooo
PriorYears
eolhctiqrs
Sro,ooo
Years 2-5
2fl9'20i2i2
Szo,ooo
55,000 510,000 SS,00O S20,0OO S25,OOO SSO,OOO 550,000 5130,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term I nstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
S22,o8o.oo
L5,000.00
0.00 1,300.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 $38,380.00
sl",ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
4,080.00
1,203.00
107.85
SG,39o.8s
544,770.85
77,770.50
(44,77O.85)
0.00 so.oo
So.oo
$tot.tt
165
165.00
s158,497.88
(29,847.23)
(24,000.00)
$to+,eso.ss
(L7,770.501
(27,000.35)
s59,879.80
s2,ooo.00
l_6,800.00
1,000.00
4,200.00
s24,000.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Tree Removal/Replacement (Blue Ravine Road)
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Fence Replacement on RileY Street
Tree Removal/Replacment
Signage Replacement
Long Term Installment Summary Totals:
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
Sr,ooo
Prior Years
Collections
s2,ooo
Year 1
20L8
s1,ooo
Year 1
2018
s1,2oo
s2,5oo
sso0
Year 2
2019
s1,ooo
Years 2-5
2At9-2022
S4,8oo
s1o,o00
S2,ooo
Year 3
2020
S1,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
S6,ooo
S12,soo
s2,5oo
Year 4
2021
s1,o0o
Years 10-20
2028-2097
s12,ooo
$25,000
Ss,ooo
Year 5
2022
$1,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
S3s,ooo
sr,ooo s2,000 $1,ooo s1,000 s1,000 s1,000 s1,000 s35,ooo Yearly
lnstallment
s1,2oo
s2,5oo
Ssoo
Prior Years
Collections
s4,8oo
$to,ooo
s2,ooo
Years 20-30
2038-2047
Srz,ooo
s2s,o0o
S5,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
s65,oo0
s80,o00
S+,ooo
s4,200 s16,800 s4,200 s16,800 s2l,ooo s42,000 542,000 s149,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Briggs Ranch
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance AnalYsis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30, 2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 37,2023)'
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total Installment Costs
s66,042.95
5,000.00
5,750.00
2,750.00
10,250.00
8,500.00
0.00 s98,292.95
s1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
73,727.00
2,O25.00
344.s2
s17,095.52
s115,389.47
80,575.15
134,8L4.32)
(0.0s)
s80,575.10
5122.28
Srzz.zg
648
558.94
(s100,326.79)
(76,926.37)
(129.340.00)
($305,593.10)
0.00 {34,8r4.321
1s34t,407.421
s42,500.00
81,430.00
2,000.00
3,410.00
s129,340.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Shrub and Tree Upgrades (E. Natoma & Blue Ravine)
Fence/Wall Repair/Replacement
Fence Repair/Replacement (E. Natoma Partial)
Pet Stations Repair/Replacement
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Bollard Repair/Replacement
Fence Repair/Replacement (Blue Ravine Partial)
Fence Repair/Replacement (E. Natoma Partial)
Entry Sign Replacement (Brass Lettering)
lrrigation Upgrades/Replacement (3 Controllers)
Landscape Lighting Upgrades or Replacement
Tree and Landscape lmprovement (Partial Collection)
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Briggs Ranch
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
$soo
Ssoo
$soo
Ssoo
s2,ooo
Prior Years
Collections
s17,5oo
S17,5oo
$1,ooo
55,500
54z,5oo
Year 1
20t8
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
s2,ooo
Year 2
2019
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
s2,ooo
Year 3
2020
Ssoo
$soo
ssoo
Ssoo
s2,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
s2,o5o
s2,s0o
s2,500
$z,soo
S2,5oo
$2,500
$2,500
s17,050
Year 4
2g2t
Ssoo
$soo
Ssoo
Ssoo
s2,ooo
Years 10-20
2028-2037
$4,100
ss,o00
Ss,ooo
Ss,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
$5,ooo
S34,1oo
Year 5
2022
ss00
Ssoo
ssoo
Ssoo
s2,0oo
Approx.
Total Required
Sso,ooo
s5o,o00
sso,ooo
56,ooo
s156,ooo
Yearly
lnstallment
s410
ss00
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
$soo
s3,410
Prior Years
Collections
Ssg,+go
S8,soo
s8,5oo
s4,000
Ss,soo
slo,ooo
s5,5oo
S81,430
Year 1
2018
s41o
Ssoo
ssoo
$soo
ssoo
ssoo
Ssoo
$9,+to
Years 2-5
2019-2022
s1,640
s2,ooo
s2,000
S2,ooo
Sz,ooo
s2,ooo
Sz,ooo
St3,640
Years 20-30
2038-2047
54,100
Ss,ooo
Ss,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
S34,too
Approx.
Total Required
s60,ooo
Seo,ooo
s60,000
Slo,ooo
s10,o0o
s7s,o00
slo,ooo
s285,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Broadstone
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment Per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June tO,2O24l
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
so.oo
0.00 0.00
0.00 48,000.00
115,000.00
0.00 s163,000.00
s1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
54,909.00
5,392.00
L,045.7t
562,346.71
5225,345.7L
392,275.70
165,928.99
(18.16)
s392,257.54
s154.e8
$164.es
2,O79
2,377.59
S81,G78.83
(150,231.14)
(32,000.00)
(s100,552.31)
0.00 t66,928.99
SGG,376.68
Sr,soo.oo
14,500.00
1,500.00
14,500.00
s32,000.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Installment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Tree and Landscape lmprovements (Partial Fund
Collection)
Bollard Repair/Replacement (40)
Light Pole/Fixture Replacement of KW
Short Term Installment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Repair lrrigation/Replace Shrubs (lron Point Median)
Tree and Landscape lmprovement or Replacement
Shrub Replacement and lrrigation Repair (28 Acres)
Landscape Lighting Replacement
Pet Station Replacement (7)
Signage Repair/Replacement
Turf Removal and lrrigation Retrofit
lrrigation Upgrades and Flow (15 Controllers)
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Broadstone
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
ssoo
ssoo
ssoo
Prior Years
Collections
Ssoo
ssoo
Ssoo
Year 1
2018
Ssoo
Ssoo
ssoo
Year 2
2019
$soo
Ssoo
$soo
Year 4
202!
Ssoo
Ssoo
ssoo
Year 5
2022
$soo
ssoo
Ssoo
Approx.
Total Required
Szs,ooo
sls,ooo
s10,000
Year 3
2020
Ssoo
ssoo
Ssoo
s1,5OO s1,5OO s1,5OO s1,500 s1,500 s1,500 s1,500 S50,ooo Yearly
lnstallment
S1,ooo
Ss,ooo
Ss,ooo
Ssoo
Ssoo
ssoo
s1,5oo
Ssoo
S14,5oo
Prior Years
Collections
s1,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
S1,soo
Ssoo
s14,5oo
Year 1
2018
$r,ooo
ss,oo0
5s,ooo
Ssoo
Ssoo
Ssoo
s1,5oo
ssoo
s14,5oo
Years 2-5
2019-2022
s4,000
s2o,ooo
s20,ooo
s2,000
s2,ooo
s2,ooo
S6,ooo
$2,ooo
S58,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
s5,000
525,ooo
S25,ooo
s2,5oo
Sz,5oo
s2,soo
$7,500
Sz,soo
S72,5oo
Years 10-20
20?,8-2037
slo,ooo
S5o,ooo
$5o,ooo
S5,ooo
$s,ooo
$5,ooo
s15,ooo
s5,ooo
s145,ooo
Years 20-30
2038-2047
Slo,ooo
$5o,ooo
Sso,ooo
$s,ooo
$5,ooo
S5,ooo
S15,ooo
Ss,ooo
s145,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
Sso,ooo
S160,000
Sl,ooo,ooo
Slo,ooo
s11,000
s40,ooo
S2oo,ooo
S45,ooo
S1,516,000
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Broadstone No. 3
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
LED Conversion
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance AnalYsis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30, 2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,20231
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30'20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total I nstallment Costs
So.oo
0.00 28,000.00
0.00 1,900.00
0.00 L0.000.00
$g9,goo.oo
s1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
0.00 817.00
312.67
52,t29.61
54L,929.67
34,488.62
(7,441.05)
(0.36)
$34,488.26
$40.84
s40.84
583
844.49
s18,629.59
(2L,286.45l'
(8.334.00)
($10,990.85)
0.00 (7,44r.Osl
($18,431.91)
So.oo
6,667.00
0.00 1,667.00
$g,gga.oo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term Installment Summary
Prsiect
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
Paint Streetlight Poles (350 Poles)
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Broadstone No.3
2023-24
YearS
lnstallment
PriorYears
Collections
Years
mixz
Years Z&lltl
w.&2w7
S16,670
Approx.
Tstal Re$ired
Appro*
Total@uired
Sso,ooo
Year 1
2018
so
Year 1
z,me
5L,667
Year 2
2019
Years 2:5
mtg-zaaT
s6,668
Year 3
2020
So so
Years 5-10
2A23,2A27
$8,335
Year4
2g2t
So
Years 1O-20
2U28-20t7
S16,670
so so Soso
Yearly
lnstallment
sL,667
Prior Yearc
Collections
56,667
s1,557 56,657 s1,667 s5,568 s8,335 s16,670 $ts,szo S50,ooo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Broadstone No.4
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Finish Year 1 Tree Pruning / Removal
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment Per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance AnalYsis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3t,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance {June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
Szgt,4o4.oo
15,000.00
42,500.00
35,000.00
0.00 0.00
90,000.00
s473,904.00
S1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
5,999.00
5,587.00
L,O45.71.
S15,631.71
S489,53s.71
97,604.66
(391,931.05)
{23.721
Sgz,sgo.gc
$sg.zs
s3e.28
2,079
2,484.15
(53tL,220.02)
(266,357.1.41
(3.000.00)
(s580,577.16)
0.00 (391.931.05)
(s972,508.21)
S1,5oo.oo
0.00 L,500.00
0.00 St,ooo.oo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Repair lrrigation/Replant Shrubs (Rathbone, Knopfler,
Other lnterior Areas)
Landscape Light Repair/Replacement (50 Lights)
Short Term Installment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
None
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
s1,500 $1,500 s1,500 s1,500 $1,500 $1,500 s1,500
Broadstone No.4
2023-24
Yearly
lnstalflilent
S1,ooo
Ssoo
Prior Years
Cdlections
S1,ooo
ssoo
Year 2
2otl,
S1,ooo
$soo
Y.ears 2.5
mLg4A22
Vear 3
2gz{J
s1,000
$soo
Years 5-1O
x)23-ixl;27
Yea,r4
2$2t
sL,000
ssoo
Years 10-20
2A2A-m37
Year5
2o22
s1,ooo
ssoo
AFproil.
ToblReguird
s5o,o00
S6,ooo
YearlV
lnshlhrent
Prior Years
Gollections
Year 1
2018
s1,ooo
ssoo
Year 1
2018
Years 2O-30
w*204fl
S56,000
Appro[
TstalRG$rired
so So so soso so so so
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Cobble Hills ll / Reflections ll
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment Per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 31,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
Installment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
s25,218.00
5,000.00
7,700.o0
2,600.00
2,050.00
1_1,500.00
s48,068.00
0.00 S1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
9,151.00
1.,185.00
2r7.61
$11,553.61
s59,621.61
44,OlL.45
(15,610.15)
0.00 s44,011.46
S113.14
$113.14
389
389.00
(s59,143.88)
(39,747.74],
(149.8s5.00)
(s248,747.621
5,000.00
(1s,610.1s)
ls25s,ts7.77l
S58,856.00
55,000.00
15,000.00
11,000.00
s149,855.00
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Tree and Landscape lmprovements or Replacement
Turf and Shrub Repair/Replacement (Mini Park and Path
to Lembi)
Short Term Installment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Fence Repair/Replacement (225 Feet)
Wall Repairs and Painting (628 Feet)
Shrub Replacement (Glenn/Oxburough)
Shrub Replacement (Sibley and Corner)
Signage Repair/Replacement
Tree and Landscape lmprovements or Replacement
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Cobble Hills lUReflections ll
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
55,ooo
Yearly
lnstallment
Sr,ooo
S1,ooo
S5,ooo
S1,ooo
Sr,ooo
s2,ooo
s11,000
Prior Years
Collections
s43,855
Prior Years
Collections
S7,soo
S36,5oo
s12,5oo
S1,ooo
s2,5oo
S5,ooo
$es,ooo
Year 1
2018
ss,o00
Year 2
20t9
ss,oo0
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
$q,ooo
S4,ooo
Szo,ooo
S4,ooo
S4,ooo
$8,ooo
S44,ooo
Year 3
2020
ss,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
Ss,ooo
55,ooo
Szs,ooo
S5,ooo
S5,ooo
Sto,ooo
$ss,ooo
Year 4
2021
Ss,ooo
Years 10-20
2028-2037
Slo,ooo
s10,o00
55o,ooo
Slo,ooo
$10,ooo
520,ooo
Suo,ooo
Year 5
2022
5s,o0o
Years 20-30
2A38-2047
Slo,ooo
Slo,ooo
Sso,ooo
Slo,ooo
slo,ooo
s20,ooo
Sl1o,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
$so,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
Slo,ooo
s40,o00
s65,ooo
$rs,ooo
S8,ooo
5s3,600
s191,600
sro,ooo s1s,000 510,000 S10,0oo S10,ooo 510,000 510,000 S40,ooo s15,000 s58,856 s15,000 s15,000 s15,000 s15,000 s15,000 Sgo,ooo Year 1
2018
s1,ooo
5t-,ooo
Ss,ooo
$r,ooo
S1,ooo
$2,ooo
S11,ooo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Cobble Ridge
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,20231
Estimated Reserve (through December 3I,20231
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs {see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total Installment Costs
$8,187.00
3,000.00
575.00
400.00
0.00 1,1.00.00
0.00 s13,262.00
s1,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,030.00
302.00
75.02 s2,4O7.O2
s15,569.02
24,6t9.56
(2,000.00)
0.02 $13,669.04
s139.48
$zst.zz
98 98.00
$t22,9s6.47
(10,446.01)
(29.s00.00)
s83,010.45
0.00 (2,000.00)
s81,010.45
s1,250.00
26,000.00
1,250.00
1,000.00
s29,5oo.oo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Year 2 Tree Pruning
Year 3 Tree Pruning
Year 4 Tree Pruning
Year 5 Tree Pruning
Fence Repair and Painting
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Fence Repair/Replacement (340 Feet)
Shrub Replacement
Tubular Fence Repair/Replacement
Tree and Landscape lmprovements or Replacement
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Cobble Ridge
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
s2so
S2so
s2so
s2so
$2so
s1,250
Prior Years
Collections
s2s0
s2so
s2so
$zso
s2so
s1,250
Year 1
2018
s2so
s2so
S2so
s2so
s2so
S1,2so
Year 1
20t8
s2s0
s2so
s2so
s2s0
Year 2
20t9
s2so
s2so
s2so
52s0
s2so
S1,2so
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
s1,oo0
Sl-,ooo
s1,ooo
s1,000
Year 3
2020
s2so
s2so
Szso
s2s0
s2so
$1,250
Years 5-10
2023-2027
s1,2so
S1,250
$1,2s0
s1,250
Year 4
2021
s2so
s2so
Szso
g2so
S2so
S1,2so
Years 10-20
2028-2037
$z,soo
s2,so0
52,500
s2,500
Year 5
2022
s2so
52so
Szso
52s0
S2so
S1,2so
Approx.
Total Required
53,000
S3,ooo
s3,ooo
s3,ooo
$s,ooo
Su,ooo
Approx.
Total Required
s2o,ooo
s2o,o00
s4,ooo
s3,000
Yearly
lnstallment
s2s0
s2so
52so
$2so
Prior Years
Collections
Srs,ooo
S5,ooo
S3,2so
5z,tso
Years 20-30
2038-2047
Sz,soo
s2,s00
S2,5oo
$2,soo
51,000 525,000 51,000 S4,OO0 S5,000 510,000 510,000 S47,ooo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Folsom Heights
FiscalYear 202tl24 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Open Space, Tree Work, Ladder Fuel Removal
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications.
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance AnalYsis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3'J', 2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
so.oo
0.00 2,500.00
2,750.OO
4,150.00
4,750.O0
28,000.00
s42,150.00
s1,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 437.OO
177.92
st,6L4.92
543,764.92
21,83L.04
(21,933.88)
0.00 s21,831.04
s70.88
S7o.s8
308
308.00
S40,48i..19
(10,509.95)
(1.000.00)
528,97t.24
0.00 (21,933.88)
s7,O37.36
Ssoo.oo
0.00 s00.00
0.00 s1,oo0.oo
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Ladder Fuel Work
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Projept
None
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Folsom Heights
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
Ssoo
Prior Years
Collections
Ssoo
Year 1
2018
Ssoo
Year 1
2018
so
Year2
2019
ssoo
Yearc2-5
20t9-2022
Year 3
2024
Ssoo
Years 5-10
2023"2027
Year 4
2021
$soo
Years 10-20
2028-2037
Year 5
2022
ssoo
Approx.
Total Required
S2s,ooo
Yearly
lnstallment
Prior Years
Collections
Ssoo
Years 20-30
2A38-2047
$25,000
Approx.
Total Required
So
$soo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo ssoo
$o so $o So So $o
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Folsom Heights No.2
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Tree Pruning, Ladder Fuel Removal
Subtotal:
lncidenta I Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment Per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3I,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
Installment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term I nsta I I ment Plan (Previously Col lected ) Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
s40,351,.00
10,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
37.000.00
S87,3s1.00
s1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
5,105.00
748.00
t77.92
s7,O3t.92
594,382.92
72,241.40
(30,141.52)
t.24
564,242.64
s2o8.s8
s234.s6
308
308.00
5283,423.26
(38,255.28)
(2,s00.00)
$242,667.98
(8,000.00)
(22.741.521
52t2,526.46
s1,250.00
0.00 1,250.00
0.00 s2,5oo.0o
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Installment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment SummarY
Project
Year 3 Tree Pruning
Year 4 Tree Pruning
Year 5 Tree Pruning
Fence Work
Tree Care in Open Space
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Glenn Wall Repair
Tree and Landscape lmprovements (Vierra Circle)
New Landscape (Glenn Drive)
long Term lnsta]lment Summary Totals:
Folsom Heights No.2
2023-24
Yearly
lnstallment
s2so
52so
s2so
$2so
S2so
s1,250
Prior Years
Collections
s2s0
s2so
Szso
s2so
s2so
S1,250
Year 1
2018
s2so
$2so
s2so
s2s0
S2so
s1,250
Year 1
2018
Year 2
20L9
$2so
52so
s2so
S2so
S2so
s1,250
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
so
so
So
Year 3
2020
$2s0
s2so
s2so
s2s0
S2so
St,25o
Years 5-10
2023-2027
So
so
5o
Year 4
202t
s2so
s2so
S2so
s2so
$2so
s1,250
Year 5
2022
s2so
s2so
Szso
s2so
s2so
S1,2so
Approx.
Total Required
Se,ooo
Sg,ooo
S8,ooo
s2,ooo
s3,ooo
s29,000
Yearly
lnstallment
so
$o
So
Prior Years
Collections
So
so
So
Years 10-20
2028-2037
so
so
So
Years 20-30
2038-2047
so
so
So
Approx.
Total Required
So
So
so
so So
So
so
so
so soso $o So so
07/25/2023 Item No.11.
Hannaford Cross
FiscalYear 2023124 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No lmprovement Projects Planned
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:
Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:
Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2023)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3I,2023)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20241
lnstaltment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total Installment Costs
Si.6,962.00
2,500.00
400.00
1,250.00
2,100.00
1,600.00
0.00 s24,812.00
$1,ooo.oo
0.00 0.00
3,776.00
1,052.00
77.47 $s,9os.+z
s30,7t7.47
20,t65.34
(10,552.13)
0.00 s20,155.34
$1es.78
s1ss.78
103
103.00
(s20,814.50)
(20,478.3r1
(14.000.00)
(s5s,292.81)
0.00 (10.552.13)
($65,S44.94)
s7,000.00
0.00 7,000.00
0.00 s14,000.00