Folsom City Council
April 23, 2024

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for t-lEAtTl-f ond INDEPENDENCE
DOMA|F| S[Vf N I Health + fommuniiy Suppori
Beiltr Aac.-.jj:-;, Af ir:rr,ii:t:tiitY -. Eairaiii'y'

GUIDING PRINCIPLES
D7.1 | Neighborhoods should be designed to encouroge heolthy living which con prevent chronic diseose, lower heolth costs, ond promote community contribution.

DZ.2 | Neighborhoods should be designed lo offer lond use synergies cnd ploce heolthcore services in proximity to neighborhoods to provide betier occess to heolthcore.
k*xir*
**&
t
D7.3 | Neighborhoods should be designed to incorporote mixed-use with flexible development regulotions to ollow for emerging heolthcore ond housing trends ond moximize equolity in occess to core systems including occommodoiing residentiol core focilities ond skilled nursing core.

D7.4 | Neighborhoods should be designed to be integroted ond promote o sense of inclusion, cooperotion, equolity, ond support.

D7.S I Arecs within neighborhoods, open spoces, ond troil/londscope corridors should provide opportunities, where oppropriote, to hove community gcrdens to grow ond occess heolthy ond inexpensive food sources.

D7.6 | Porks ond open spaces should provide opportunities to exercise, reod, meditote, proy, etc to promote holistic wellness ond synergy between physicol ond mentolwell-being. rhe seifing in whictt one Jiyes hos o cleor impocl on heolfh ond menls/ well-being. lntenlionally plcnning a cammunity snd orchjfec ling the living spoces in such o way thal il incorpcroles evidence-bosed besl proctices, ihol olso includes fhe fcciliioticn of ossisijye iechnoiogies , can oplimize heolth <rnd independence, qnd odd "life lc ones lalet years"

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for IlEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
DOtulAlN e IGHT I Civic Foriicipation + Employmenl
Bellei igrvice + Work Cco:.;rrL-tr''tl:r:s
ti*xf*trs

GUIDING PRINCIPTES
D8.l I Neighborhoods should offer employment opporiunities such thot residents con live ond work in ihe some community ond cultivote community engogement.

D8.2 | Neighborhoods should be designed to optimize lond use synergies thoi promote opportunities io volunteer in the communily ond contribute to lhe community ot lorge.

D8.3 | SECOND PLACES should offer employmeni opportunities ottroclive to o ronge of skill ond educotion levels offering o ronge of incomes.

Dg.4 | THIRD pLACES should offer o voriety of recreotion, educotion, volunieerism. ond stewordship opportunities to promote leorning, wellness, ond sustoinobility.

D8.5 | Civic ond employmeni environments should include wolkoble spoces with proximity io commerciol services, business, ond tronsporlotion; green spoces ond shode; ond THIRD PLACES ossocioied with positive heclth ottributes.

Dg.6 | Civic ond employment environments should promote community inclusion by including woyfinding ond informotion gothering methods io guide ond inform residenis ond visitors' Far peaple with cjisobilifi es. employmenf apportunilies ore offen limiied in number and poarly molcirec' la lhek individualjnferesls ondiolenfs. Designing a cammunity lo ensure iipr.ovides arange oi employmeni, volvnleer, and learning opporlunilies is crificallo oddressing this prcbtem, and atlowing people with disobilifies fo live lheir besl iives' {

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTI--I ond INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE

I PART THREE I

PROJECT POSITIONING

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH onci INDEPENDENCE
LOCr\Ttoilt I The coMMUNtTy FoR HEALTH AND TNDEPENDENCE is strctegiccllv locoted odjccent to two highly recommended ploces to live in cclifornio. Both the city of Folsom ond the community of El Dorodo Hills hove moiured inio destinotions for high quolity of life, tremendous community services, sofety, ond sound governonce'
THE COMMUNITy stroddlestheSocromenioCounty/El DorodoCountyline justsouthof theCiiyof Folsom ond El Dorodo Hills. Regionol occess to the Plon Areo is from Highwoy 50' ond primory locol occess lo the Plon Areo is from white Rock Rood. THE COMMUNITY is locoted odjocent to existing ond plonned development to the north (Folsom Plon Areo specific Plcn) ond to the eost (corson creek Specific Plon).

The physicol ospects of the site provide no significont risks from eorthquokes, flooding, or wildfire' ond provide no loss of prime formlond to the region. The sile hos rolling terroin ollowing for locolvisfos' interesting rood ond mulli-use iroil design, ond creeks thot provide recreotionol opporiunities' c$MtnuljlTY LSCd\TlCIl: AllD Rn&le hiAL DTMCIGR'{Pflifs i The Project onticipotes o voriety of homes ond residences (including units in mixed-use designotions) os well os retoil ond service uses. Ambulotory heolihcore, porks' openspoce,tronsit,ondcommunitysupportserviceswillbeembeddedinthe development.
our populction continues io oge in colifornio ond the Sccromento region' The odult populotion oged 60 yeors ond older in the Socromento region is projected io increose 78%by 2030 (588,000 to 1,045,000). Those turning 65 yeors beiween 2015 ond 2ol9 are expected to live on overoge of 23.6 yeors with 4'5 yeors spent with one or more limitotions. There ore thousonds of odults with intellectuol ond/ordevelopmenioldisobilitiesihctliveinSocromenioCountyofwhich56% hove on intellectuol disobility ond 35% hove on Autism spectrum disorder' seveniy three percent of odults wiih intellectuol/ developmentol disobilities hove mild or moderofe intellectuol deficits ond moy be oble to live independently' About 75% ot young odults with intellectuol/developmeniol disobilities live with their porent/guordion, however, os ihey ond their porent's oge, only 25% (oged 51-62 yeors) remoin in their porent/guordion home'
Ihe proportion of the U.s. oged populotion is growing significonily; between 2021 and 2050 ihe number of colifornions oged 55+ yeors is expected to increose by 7o%. colifornions in this oge group will experience increosing rotes of oge-reloted disobilities cnd chronic heolth conditions thot ore ossocioted with longer lifesPons.
kxl'*ls
{
Adults overwhelmingly express interest in oging in plcce' which hos strong implicotions for supply ond demond in relotion to Colifornio's housing ir,ortoge. There is olso increosing interest in ond demond omong odulfs with intellectuol/developmentol disobilities ond their fomilies for more offordoble independent living ond supportive housing choices'
These trends represeni mojor oppodunities for innovotive design ond development of community projects thot encouroge heolihy oging ond prolong independeni living' ge#
.'Jl

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMI,JNITY f,-.,, HEALTl-l trlci INDEPTNDENCE
....:t...,'.,\.. i ",:::t ii:r,- l.,i:jriii:: .:.' : The COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND INDEPENDENCE is locoted odjocent to the existing ond plonned communilies of Folsom ond El Dorcdo Hills' !
t.
irf,
\l
&lli'
4i'.ri:t:

I
'Pa
Eroadston e
Erro i!'e'R.tnch
';.lnri 43
k\
'i
I
t -. .. {
El Doraidb
t'
nailaciio.P
i
.: r^!
-- FLJL
."t-*'
I sr,b ojcug h
a::E aston Valrey Yie?/
a.
, E 3 is Jc]
Pian A:ea
Sirecrtr:.Fiar:' !

1. I -E
i,
I
I
t
I i: amon
Aerol
I ! tea{
t
,"f,
sacram-ento
CountY
illtrtre tla t
I
I
I
t]Jr
I
i" -rr[]tlaa-3aa
tl
I
I
rl
I
Il;
tC,
I
";rrr
'L I
l-r.aq;11q:.11
itl..tt'
^ lt"
!
:!]ol
I
IlrP t
I
: i -'1
Lrr
t.

1.,-1-..-"1

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTF{ ond INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY tor HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE

PART FOUR

LAND USE MASTER PLAN

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
LAND USE REGUiATION i Discussed here is ihe coMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND TNDEPENDENCE MASIER PLAN for ihe entire plcnned community. For land use detoils specific to the Folsom ond El Dorodo County portions of the MASTFR PLAN' pleose refer to PART SEVEN of this documenf .

Ihe r.taiTER F-L&i'i lond use designotions minor lhose used in the Folsom Plon Area Specific Plon qnd cre described herein.

THECOMMUNJIY TON HgAIIH ANO
'NDfPENDFHCg
MA5?SRPIAN
5t
5rttD
MtD
MrulD
J *rxo
I
A? Sfli*
Al trllil
At &tti3
riti
$C
iNDIiiP
iCOtlFiaxi
INtli'lP
i?€SEARCtti
Pr to
ItCHOCIi
55-l.il
c5-iii{
O\.IC
R*nDwav
C C \r Art 'rr lr ;i '/
^.4 pnrN
In dtrHf Ao
Ci'JiC SAF!?Y
COMMUNITY for HEALTH
ONd INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH qnd INDEPENDENCE
A COLLECTION OF ptACES I Rs iniroduced in ihe Plon's Vision, the Plon is conceived os o well- connected collection of pLACES. These Ploces, together, occount for the locotions ihot support the sociol ond economic hobits of the diverse residents within the community of lorge. The C O M M U N ITY FoR HEALTH AND TNDEpENDENCE is designed to include FIRST PLACES, SECOND PLACES, ond THIRD pLACES which togetherform o complete community. Additionolly, ond unique toTHE COMMUNITY' the Plon includes EXCEPTIONAL PLACES,
FXCEPTIONAL pLACES I Ploces we Reseorch, Dlscover, Culfivafe, Adapt, Support Exceptionol Ploces refers
to the 200-ocre UC
Dovis Teoching,
Reseorch, ond Heolth
Complex locoted ot
the heort of the
MASTER PLAN. ThC UC
Dovis Site/ComPlex is
proposed to focilitote
leorning (for
reseorchers, students,
ond residents) ond
provide opportunities
to conduct lifesiYle
ond heolth reseorch
thot will expond
knowledge obout
effective communitY
design ond promote
heolthy oging ond
longevity.

The UC Dovis
Site/Complex is
oniicipoted to include
mony components,
which moy include but ore not limiied to ihe following. Detoils on the focilities ond services to be provided ore in ihe eorly stoges of plonning ond yet to be determined by the University' . Resecrch/Lecrning Fccililies
. HeolthccreFcciliiies
. ClinicclSpcce
. Perforrning Arts OPPcrlunlties
. Specicrlty Core Housing & Skilled l'lursing Ccre
. Alobile Lcborotory/Urgent Ccre Services
. Ccmmunily Cutreoch, Educotion, & Support Services (including At-Home Core-Giver Trcining) ' Reseclrl:h Gordens/CommL-.rnilyGordens
' CommunilY Cenier
' lnnovciive Trcnsit Oplions
rtt o
t FUTURE I'C
DAVIS
srTr/

COMPLEX

FUTUNE UC
DAVIS
tlTE/
cofinnEx

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY tor HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
FIRST pLACtS I plcrce:; rr'/e Live, Tl-rri're, Grc;ir.r I FIRST PLACES refers to our homes; ihis is where we begin ond end eoch doy, our'home bose'. FIRST PLACES cre the residentiolorecs of fhe Plon ihot provide sofe refuge ond spoces in which to nurture, core for, ond grow us ond our fomilies' Multi- generotionol, oge-torgeted ond neuro-diverse development ore ollowed in ollresidentiol lond uses. "AT" lobeled sites ore specificolly- designoted for Age-Torgeted developmeni.

Low Densily
Residenliol I Low
density residentiol
includes
designotions for
Single Fomily (SF I -
4duloc) ond
Single-Fomily High
Density (SFHD 4-
7dv/oc).

Medium Densily
Residentioll
Medium density
residentiol includes
designotions for
Multi-Fomily Low
Densiiy (MLD 7-
l2duloc) ond
Multi-Fomily
Medium DensitY
Residentiol (MMD
12-2odvloc).

SF
SFHD
MLD
MMD
MFID

AT-SFHD
AT.fuILD
AT-MHD
ttJU (lvlixed Use Village)
"'l,"cig
.. .- ..1
_l
.
*-t
{m
--;il
n
wfi
#
High Density
Residenliol I High
densiiy residentiol
includes o
designotion for
Multi Fomily High
Density (MHD 20'
3odu/oc). High density resideniiol is intended for multi-fomily ottoched units offered os morket-rote or offordoble housing.

Villoge Mixed Use I Mixed-use (MU) designoted sites include reloil, office, services (0.5 FAR), ond residentiol uses (9.30du/oc) in o supportive urbon setting to promote wolkcbility ond independence' Block lengths ore short, ond sites ore loid oui in o grid pottern to promote wolkobility ond woyfinding' Age-iorgeted ond physicol/neuro-diverse development ore ollowed in mixed-use oreos'

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH onct INDEPENDENCE
Si:COtlD pL/,,C1-5 I Ploces 'NeV,lorV., Do Bu:;iness, Shoc I SECOND PLACES refers to ourworkploces ond ploces of commerce; this is where we go when we leove our homes io eorn o living ond provide for ourselves ond our fcmilies. Second Ploces ore the employment, shopping, ond service oreos of the plon thot provide ihe economic engine of the community which, in turn, provides the finonciol meons to promote living.

Villoge Mixed Use I Mixed-use (MU)designcted sites include retoil, office, services (0'5 FAR), ond residentiol uses (9-30du/oc) in o supporiive urbon setting to promote wolkcbility ond independence' Block lengths ore short, ond sites ore loid out in o grid pottern io promote wolkobility ond woyfinding' Villoge core oreos with odjocent porks will be designed to creote synergies between lond uses, such os locoting coffee shops wiih outdoor seoting neor porks.
'.+,L,
Commerciol+ Reseorch I The Plon includes Generol
Commerciol (GC) ond Regionol Commerciol (RC) oreos
for neighborhood retoil ond o Lifestyle Center, os well os lndustriol/Office Pork (lND/OP) oreos intended for
Reseorch ond DeveloPment.

UC Dovis Sile/Complex I
The Plon includes c lorge
complex for UC Dovis
(lND/OP) ihol is proPosed
to serve os o center for
ihe study of oging ond
longevity. This complex
moy olso provide
outreoch ond support
services io the
communiiy.

Schools I Elementory
schools ond o middle
school (POP) ore sited
within neighborhoods ond
will provide on
employment oPPortunitY
within the community.

Civic Sofety I Low
enforcement ond fire
protection services ore
plonned in the MU Villoge
oreo ond provide
odditionol employmeni
opportuniiies in the Plon
Areo.
lvlU (lt/ixed Use Vlllage)
GC
RC (Lifestyle)
INDIOP (UCDH ComPlexi
INDiOP (Research)
P/QP (School)
imergency Services
-r::j
:n
il
-._.i
- .',
*
7

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEATTH oncl INDEPENDENCE
IHIRD PLACES I Picrcr:s We Plcry, Explore , Lecrn I THIRD PLACES refers to our ploces of recreotion, educotion, ond sociol interoction; this is where we go when we leove our homes ond workploces to goin enrichment of our minds, bodies, ond souls. Third Ploces ore the porks, open spoces, schools, ond community gothering oreos of the Plon thot provide the heolth, well-being, ond educotion meons to promote respect ond inclusion in the community.
porks + Open Spoce I porks (P) ore locoted throughout ihe Plon Areo ond provide ploces for possive ociivity ond octive progromming. open spoce (os) oreos ore provided to preserve noturolcreos for flood control ond species conservotion, os well os for detention ond retention bosins' Note: porks thot ore shown os 'circles' ore ploceholders in the MASTER PLAN; octuol pork size ond shope will be determined ct time of smoll lot tentotive mop for the surrounding neighborhood. Pork feotures ond ploygrounds will be designed to meet the universol needs of on oge, physicolly, ond neurologicolly diverse populotion. porks, open spoces, ond londscope corridors should provide opportunities, where oppropriote, for inclusion of edible londscope plonts to offer eosy occessibility to heolthy foods' Schools I Elementory schools ond o middle
school (PQP) ore sited within neighborhoods to
serve ihe
educotionol needs
of K-8 students.

High school
studenis ore
envisioned to
ottend existing
ond plonned high
schools in the locol
school districts.

Further
coordinotion with
the school districts
is necessory to
oddress the needs
of the communitY.

Ploces of Worship
I Ploces of
worship ore
proposed to be
permitted
ihroughout the
Plon Areo in
residentiol ond
commerciol uses
with o Conditionol
Use Permit.
-.__1
;IG
:i
I
: , ,i
---_1
PQP (School)
P (Park)
OS (Open Space)
OS-RR (SPTC Conidor)
O'S-l-C (Landscape Ccnidor)
OS-TC (TrailConidor)
#

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTFI oncl INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH oncl INDEPENDENCE

PART FIVE

MOBILITY PLAN

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
TRANSPORTATION SETTING I Key to the Plon is the development of on integroted opprooch to mobility ond circulotion such thot provided tronsportotion routes ore direct, efficieni, logicol, ond prociicol. Heolthy mobility offers olternotives to driving for doily goods ond services ond promotes wolking ond biking os o woY of life.

H1GHWAy 50 TNTERCHANGE ACCESS I Access to the COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND TNDEpENDENCE from Highwoy 50 is provided from multiple highwoy interchonges including Proirie City Rood, ook Avenue Porkwoy {plonned), Bidwell Sireet, Empire Ronch Rood (plonned), Lotrobe Rood' ond Silvo Volley PorkwoY.
cAptTAL SOUTHEAST CONNECTOR I White Rock Rood is locoted olong the northern boundory of TH E COMMU N ITY.

The Copitol
Southeost
Connector is
plonned to
extend from
Highwoy 99 in
Elk Grove to
Lotrobe Rood
in ElDorodo
County. This
expresswoy
feotures
troditionol
signol-
controlled
intersections
ond grode-
seporoted
urbon
interchonges
intended to
focilitote
efficient troffic
movements.

The Project
Proponent is
coordinoting
with the SE
Connector
gus Rapid transit (BRTI toute
CaPiial Southeasl Conn.(lor
-
LatrcbaloWhita Roel Connlcto{
? Rogional Park Sltt
JPA ond locol ogencies regording project occess detoils'

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNiTY ror l--IEALTH crncl INDEPENDENCE
LATROBF ROAD TO Wt-ilTE ROCK ROAD COhiNECIOR I Regionoltronsportotion plonning efforts identified the potentiol for o Loirobe Rood to white Rock Rood connector thot would fociliiote eost- west occess ond ultimotely improve occess to Highwoy 50, through THE COMMUNITY' Design of the plon Areo occommodotes the Lotrobe Rood to white Rock Rood connector by linking Plon Areo roodwoys ot the heori of the Plon Areo to on opproved off-site irrevocoble offer of dedicolion (lOD) for o roodwoy oi the south side of the proposed regionol pork site in the opproved Corson Creek project' BU5 RAptD lRANStT iBRT) I A Bus Ropid Tronsit (BRT) route is provided in the Folsom Plon Areo specific plon thol extends from Proirie City Rood to White Rock Rood. This BRT route is olso shown extending south of white Rock Rood in THE COMMUNITy olong the Socromento Plocerville Tronsportotion corridor (spTC roil corridor) to on undetermined locotion within the Plon Areo. Deioils of o po'tentiol future extension of BRT will be defined in the future.
iHADY TRT{ CANOPY CLASS IV 3IK::i\E\I LAi'iES "iHADY iRii :Ai\iCPY :
!,
FOLSAM ;'
1r:,at i
p,C$ I
i
I
f
t
-da:
:lt&
5,;lr
t-?:,: !r'
-t
I
a
al
n t) l t
?n
t
B
s*
o.-'nN*
,'
' .*,)o.", ' .,1;r' .'l]-rr*n.'f ',; ' " ;'i ;;.,*!1; ' -i,;,;'j,4 .i.;"" .rlt actl l/
al)r: J.:
3C rAliliCnPi
:cRt:**q'/J1lH
3!':tiAr" (
]t tc il r-Alio)c.qli c.]qRlf,ti
\rV;iil C'rASi I i?-Aliu
it4 ?.)/r
,,,;lLSOi'i r' lA rl
Z-1):T V,ILLAGE PAR(WAY 2' 't"l 'c.; -'Jte.')t ai6'll 5,f -1lrq;', 11 n',11:'J irce l:lg+ 14/poo^
"ctro.4o!,lTRCEE
atriliEl-l ICq
:/
H.:
rT
-S .;"'i .1'
ri,E{'
2'z
7z
:{)
.q)
O
og
',c
se
o
..rt
White Rock Road
Wilson Ranch Rcad
Empire RancI RoadiVillage Parkway
Latrobe Connector
Village Pariway
Lifestyle Drive
Village Parkway 2
Rural Parkivay
Urban Street
Primary Local Street
i-j
s
^u'
-aE
ee
z\-r.
() 1(11
oi!)o,'--

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH and INDEPENDENCE
PL,l\llFlHD toiOgiLlTY SYgT€M I The mobilitv plon
forthe COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND
I N DE P E N DEN CE incorporotes multiple
opportunities for trovel routes for outos'
pedestricns, bicyclists, ond other motorized
personcl vehicles.

COMMUNITY MICRO-TRANSIT I An on-demond
ride system is onticipoted in THE COMMUNITY
which will provide tronsportotion options thot
ollow residenis to continue io be mobile ond
cctive in ihe community which will help to
prevent isolotion ond help ollow residents to
remoin independently in their homes longer'
ROADWAYS I PrimorY occess to TH E
COMMUNITY is from White Rock Rocd on the
norih, ond Lotrobe Rood on the Eosi' The
Empire Ronch Rood interseciion of White Rock
Rood will be initiolly consiructed cs o signolized
ot-grode intersection; however, it is plonned to
occommodote c fuiure grode-seporoied
urbon inierchcnge. Additionol occess to the
Plon Areo is plonned of Whiie Rock Rood
between Wilson Ronch Rocd ond the SPTC
roilrocd crossing os well os vio o fuiure Lotrobe
Rocd Connector.

Aulonomous Vehicles I Autonomous vehicle
technology will continue to be developed ond
moy be occommodoted within the Plon Areo
roodwoy neiwork.

On-Streel Bike Lones I Closs lV buffered on-street
bike lones ore provided on mojor orteriol ond
collector roods. Additionolly, Closs ll bike lones
ore provided on minor collector ond primory
residentiolstreets. Clcss lll bike routes ore
provided on oll locol residentiol ond urbon streets'
NEV Lones I Neighborhood Eleciric Vehicles
(NEVs) moy be port of the Plcn Areo ond moy be
ollowed on ollPlon Areo roodwoys' Where
roodwoy speeds ore 35mph or greoter' the Closs
lV buffered bike lones will olso serye os shored
neighborhood eleciric vehicle (NEV) lones' Where
trovel speeds ore less thcn 35mph, NEVs will shore
the trovel lones with outo troffic'
*:.
"d

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH ancl INDEPENDENCE
TRAILS + BIKEWAYS I Troils ond bikewoys ploy o mojor role in the hCOIth Of thE COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND INDEPENDENCE
ond they ore proposed to be locoted within the Open Spoces foundinthisplon.Wolkingisreportedosthenumberoneformof
exercise in ihe United Sioies ond promoies both physicol ond mentolwellness. Creoting ploces in which to wolk cnd ensuring comfortoble ond efficient trovel encouroges people to wolk or bike lo work ond lo get their dcily goods ond services'
Benefiis from doily wolking include improved cordiovosculcr fitness, lower blood pressure, sironger muscles, ond bones (built up by wolking regulcrly), decreosed stress, improved sociol connectivity' ond increosed community involvement'
iCiSOlt,I
n{
FDI
t*
a
r
)?-'
i;i,AD? lti: CAliilP / :.. _: l
I
I
-!
I
I-l
I
..t -
p.cail 'l

1.,
i
#
.rl.4D i
:1r!
;j . ;rl l:ri;i. i:;q?:Dti'rjr:! :'nj'; : :?r'ii'
;;1i 1;,'t;ri i'.')Al
C LASS i RA|LROAD TRAIL
i;n:.brlrN ;l irli
',':il seJr.elt ia
ii4 ielerrrreil
" r \-DIPL
'' aa}',\iEi;;t{
1,-
*w Railroad Trail
Village Sidewalk Plaza
-
Urban Street Srdewalk
I LandscaPe Corrtdors tlith
Class I Trails
ir
Q" rf
l;\?
h\99'2
4a
a
\
I?
!

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
Londscope Corridors with Closs I Troils I A 30'-50'
londscope corridor is provided olong ihe mojor
roodwoys ond will incorporoie c wide sidewolk on
one side (within the 30' londscope conidor) ond o
Closs I troil on the other side (wiihin the 50'
londscope conidor). The Closs I troils ore cn extension of the Closs I troils provided in the Folsom Plon Areo
on Sovonnoh Porkwoy, Empire Ronch Rood, ond
White Rock Rood.

Roilrood Troil Corridor I A 30' 50' Closs I troil corridor is provided clong one side of the mojority of ihe
Socromento Plocerville Tronsporiotion Corridor (SPTC)
roilrood corridor. This troil corridor will offer
opportunities for recreotion ond sociol gothering, os
well os communitY gordens.

Mixed-Use Villoge Sidewolk Plozos I Wiihin mixed-
use oreos, troditionol streetside sidewclks will give
woy to wide 'sidewolk plozos' wilh iree wells which
will creote spoces for outdoor dining ond informol
gothering with bench seoting ond oiher outdoor
furniiure. Villoge streets ore intended io octivote
lively sforefronis ond creote possive gothering spoces
for wolkers, shoppers, ond residents.

Urbon Slreel Sidewolks I Urbon streets ore in ihe MU
Villoge oreos where block lengths ore short, ond
streels ore norrow ond wolkoble. These sireets
feoiure ottoched wide sidewolks with tree wells,
plonters. cnd fixed seoting.
:- .t
?. ,.-
jr(" .'
Sofe Roules to School I The Plon provides street-
odjocent sidewolks ond neighborhoods will be
designed io creote street loyouts thot leod lo schools
ond porks. Additionolly, Closs lll shored bike routes will be provided on cll residentiol streets where Closs ll
ond Closs lV on-street bike lones ore not designoted'

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH ono INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE

PART SIX I

UTILITY PLAN

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNTTY ror HEALTFI oncl INDEPENDENCE
uTlLlTl15 + sERVlcfrS Sf;TTlllG I Key to the pton is the development of on integroted cpprooch to utitity infrostructure ond public services such thot buildout of the COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND lN DEPENDENCE moy be occomplished sustoinobly.

WA1IR I With the proposed onnexotion of the Sccromento County portion of THE COMMUNITY to lhe Cify of Folsom, the Project Proponent willwork closely with the City io provide woter for its portion of the plcn Areo (WEST pLAN AREA). Woter demonds needed to serve the Wesi Plon Areo will hove no cdverse impoci to The City's existing surfoce woter rights.

To serye wcter to the El
Dorodo County portion of
THE COMMUNITY ,IhC
eostern poriion of the
project (EAST PLAN AREA)
is proposed to onnex to
EID through c LAFCO
process ond opprovol of
the EID Boord. q:.

Additionol woter service opiions for TH E CoMMU N ITY ore olso being investigoted, including utilizing the region's lorger woter supply system ihrough one or more cooperotive progroms by ond between the locol woter purveyors. lf feosible, o cooperotive wcter service progrom could ollow for more creotive ond efficient provision of woter service to the Plon Areo.

ToreducepotoblewoterdemondswithinthePlcnAreo,iiisenvisionedthotTHE COMMUNITY would include focilities to ollow recycled woier use within ihe Plon Areo. A "purple pipe" system could be insiolled in the Plon Areo to deliver recycled wcter to irrigoted oreos within the proiect' vVASj-[\ivA il-R i Wostewoter ond
recycled woter service opiions for TH E
COMMUNITY ore being studied.

Adjocent woslewoter purveyors
(including City of Folsom, Socrcmento
Regionol Sonitotion District, cnd El
Dorodo lrrigotion District) ore potentiol
service providers thot will be
oppropriotely onolyzed. ln oddition, o
cooperoiive wostewoter ond recycled
woier service progrom, by ond be'tween
the locol wostewoter purveyors, could
ollow for more creoiive ond efficient
provision of wostewcter service to the Plon Areo
'1,
.,1
I .2:it!-:

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH onci INDEPENDENCE
ILi:aIR jCiTY i SMUD is the eleciriciiy provider for
the Socrcmento CountVlCity of Folsom portion of
THE COMMUNITY ond PG&E is the electricity
provider for ihe El Dorodo County portion of the
Plon Areo. The Project Proponent will coordinote
with SMUD ond PG&E on innovotive woys to serve
the Plon Areo.
f.lAiUi<Ai GA:i i Noturol gos services, if provided
to the Plon Arec, would be provided by PG&E'
Provision of noturol gos services to lhe Plon Areo is
to be determined.

Pl-j(-);'lF, CABii, BROAf,'8Ai'iD, I lf"lIiRNl'r ; ln
cddition to providing high-speed internet,
troditionol phone, coble, ond broodbond services
will be provided to THE COMMUNITY' Eosy ond
occessible occess to the iniernet, ond other
technologies, ore key to the success of TH E
COMMUNITY doily woy of life. The Project
Proponent is working with UC Dovis cnd their
Portners, in colloborotion with locol internet service
providers, io idenlify relioble ond redundont
sources for internet ond technology services'
C\./]C:Al'il l'1 : Low enf orcement, fire, ond
ombulonce emergency response services will be
provided io the Plon Areo- Opporiunities exisi for
colloborotion with ond between vorious low
enforcement ogencies, fire districts, ond other
urgent responders. Concepiuol locotions for
sofeiy service response ore shown on the LAND
USE MASTER PLAN in the Mixed-Use oreos of the
Plon in both the West ond Eost oreos of the Plon;
detoils of which will be determined during the
developmeni of ihe Plon ihrough coordinoiion
with the opProPriote ogencies'
DRAII'nAGE i Droinoge will generolly be
monoged ihrough o series of onsiie droinoge
infrostructure (e.g., droinpipes, woter quolity
bosins. detention, ond retenJion bosins' etc')
such ihot the Project odheres to federol' stote'
ond locol regulotions. Locotions ond size needs
of droincge focilities ore being siudied ond ore
not yei shown on the LAND USE Moster Plon'
{ sllluo
l
..1
f.{
ili[i
ii11ii
r':1il
1:t'
rI f;*= ' : 'lr:.".-,""'
t,

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY tor FIEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH cno INDEPENDENCE

PART SEVEN

M PLEMENTATION DTTAILS

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

THE
WEST
PtAN
AREA
COMMUNTTY for HEALTH cnd INDEPENDENCE
ThC IONdS Of thE COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND INDEPENDENCE OTC iN bOth thc COUNTY Of socromento (wEST PLAN AREA) ond El Dorodo county (EAST PLAN AREA)' described seporotely below

THE COMMUNITY FOR HEALTH AND INDEPENDENCE
WEST PLAN ARrA I THE WEST PLAN AREA is proposed in the city of Folsom' CIWCIF
ForsoM
rHF WFSI

PIAN ARFA
lond Use Flon ftoAo
SF
SFHD
MLD
MMD
MHD
AT€FHD
AT-MLD
AI.MHD
MU (l'Iixed iJse Village)
U\,
RC
IND/OP (Research)
IND/OF (UCDH ComPlex)
PQP {School)
P (Park)
OS (Open SPace)
OS-RR (SPTC Corridor)
OS-LC (LandscaPe Corridor)
OS-TC (Trail Corridor)

ROADWAY
ROADWAY (White Rock Road)
Emergency Services
'4,
?
t4)
;T
1:5ff
I
77:4
rm
-il
i-:.i
^__J
tu
I
'I
.''_:
wti
*
"cr\:BJR
qio^
or,9.qrz'
Vrz-z^1
\
\

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

THE
WEST
PtAN
AREA
COMMUNTTY tor HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
IHF WFST PLAN ARFA Lsnd Use Summory Toble
ENTITLE/\/ENTS +

FNVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW I Project
eniitlements will be
sought in the CitY
of Folsom ond ore
onticipoied to include the following
. Generol Plon Amendments
' Prezone/Rezone
' Specific Plon
. Project-LevelEnvironmentol
lmpoct RePort
. Annexotion /Sphere of
lnfluence Amendment
(Londs)
. Annexotions/Detochments
from SPeciol District
GENERAL PLAN I At the time of initiol
project opplicotion, the porlion of
the Plon Areo in Socromento CouniY
wos designoted Generol Agriculture
(80oc.) os shown on the CountY
Assessors records. This oreo is
proposed io be onnexed to the CitY
of Folsom ond receive lond use
designotions os determined bY the
City.

ZONING I At the time of initiol
nonoiive submittol, the portion of
the Plon Areo in ihe CountY of
Socromento wos zoned Generol
Agriculture (80oc.) os shown on the
County Assessors records. This oreo is
proposed to be onnexed to the CitY
of Folsom ond receive zoning
designotions consistent with the City
of Folsom MunicipolCode, Specific Plon District'
LAFCo I LAFCo oclions will be required to omend ihe County of Socromenio boundory ond Ciiy of Folsom Sphere of lnfluence such thot the londs wiihin the county of socromento moy be onnexed into the city of Folsom. Addiiionol LAFCo octions will olso be required for ottochment/detochment to/from vorious speciol districts-
Gross Areo
(Acres)
I .ll .t
I
Dwelling
Unils
I
Use
{ l-4rlulr:lci 5irrgle :lrttil',
I 66tD (4 7(-Jr-r,/!,1r, I :!it;i-tl; :r-:t: rl1 Fi'-ili:)ifl!;l',' Jv,l
{/'' 2dului,) ill.,riii-F(:lirrii'; L:"* lre"i1,j1}
-ll1)5.5MMD ( I l-2Or 1L r/r(:. I I'Jr rlti- i,Jrr rit'r' l''if clir rrr' liefl lil7 4i).7D i2u-JCdui,1,: I rvlulti',:ri riiY i{i!il f)err5riv 644.7
l:j6 3
I

3.481
I
5DQ]c)rlleteii :"rriite ;1ln ril! Hrq-' tjirl9'tY
subfotol Itodirionol Residenlidl
I-5FHD lj-/rrljilt]il) Age-
I i,]
!,7 ', 2,.-h-t I t7r' I A{jE-Tt:rla:e:eiJ l'ltiirl-F.jnil! La:.! Liirr!it! | +.)I ii.i,lAT-MHD i2l!;ri,\,ltrl'lci Aile I,-:r:l;iirl i,1L lil-F :l-r l'. l- riiil arsrttit'i 92t
If,8
I
I 68-7

24. l
Srrbloloi Age-Iorgefed Residenliol
r?,,10{i.r/ii,- ,tr l.i.; lAFll i,l 'i.:-1 !. !i vjlial':.,i r;,.r-1i,-: .';,ir I tt.ttlft:j 'i r: : ' . f'rl =ii1:'l 5 F,qRl R=t;ir-,rrrri :, :irirrr er,:ic .ilitrria ii--rr1ij Subfof cd /ii{ixed- tis.e Vilfi s'ge
RC itr
24-t
,lli. l
I
1 )':: )IND/oP Cornplex i1.!; F4.F j l.,clUr':rifliii:i'il:+ F:rR Urltirl : ']::'i]-!ii *1 | :-'.ilIND/OP Reseotch i'1,r FAF i lr.-lliiirir:ll,t -\jtlJ' e Fc't Fli!;:r1::'r' t08
i!.,,jri..-i FAFI ] :'',rl,ria j':l!,ralr.- ;'.i l ! - Fr,r:-lii Jr-- iii-r{-, ji t75.1
i:rl..',
I
subfotcl Co{nrneralbf & Fjrnplof tneni
P l'irk:..

OS :L:lTr l[,i]i:e
lii_i: ipErr :F,i,,,{ - Fiallil 1r-1:l'.-i ;'rx;dh
rl'.i,'-')lldl, :iIit1-:a L'.:i rr.-lrit-:ii l;,iirc i i ' frl-laili:i 1r.8,
339"6
I
Subfedd F€ttks & OPefi Spoce
l,1.tj,rr {-r,: -ril;liir I
r E{- Fl. : J. ili. l'."{l'-+ E'''j.r+. R'lii{:l l

64.2suhfor€r{ Ciicu*nlfon & llilf$€
4,51I1.416.32

WEST PLAN AREA
A€Sd€tdd
i&d.lkg
rca&
Pdtrf @e*tPoeE

WEST PLAN AREA TOTAT
tond llla @ntffErs aftd Fat e FqF{ffion cd@l F6io{t Ge M sl f$oar 3*wlAH*F€etrc Plc&

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNTTY for HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
THE COMMUNITY FOR HEAI.TH AND INDEPENDENCE
EAST PtAN AREA I THE EAST PLAN AREA is proposed in El Dorodo countv THE EASI PLAN ,ARFA tond Use Plon
CIWOF
FOLSOM
c0ss
RO;{D
5r
SFHD
MLD
MMD
MHD
AT.SFHD
AT-MLD
AT.MHD
MU (Mixed Use Village)
GC
RC
INDiOP (Research)
IND/OP (UCDH ComPlex)
PQP (School)
P (Park)
OS (Open Space)
OS-RR (SPTC Corridor)
OS-LC (LandscaPe Corridor)
OS-TC (TrailCorridor)

ROADWAY
ROADWAY (White Rock Road)
Emergency Senrices
,,(a"
4u4n
I
:-- .:
|Eq;
ffi
I
7:Z
'&1it
I'in
-I
:ffi
,:-,:
:l
r
;-l
-:,--:l
,,
*
THE
EAST
PtAN
AREA

04/23/2024 Item No.11.
'HE
EAST
PLAN
AREA
COMMUNITY ror HEA.[_TH oncl TNDEPENDENCE
IHE EASI PLAN ARFA Land Use Summary lob/e
ENTITLEMEI'.]IS +
EI.IVIRCi!^IENTAL
REVIEW I Projecr
entitlements will be
sought in El Dorodo
County ond ore
oniicipoted to include, but ore not
limited io, the following.
. Generol Plon Amendments
. Rezone
. Specific Plon
. Project-LevelEnvironmentol
lmpoct Reporl.
. Annexotions/Detochments
from Speciol Districts
GINERAI PLAN I The EtDorodo
County Generol plon seis forth the
generol guidelines for orderly growth
ond development within the County
of El Dorodo. At the time of nonotive
submifiol opplicotion, the portion of
ihe Plon Areo in El Dorodo County
wcs designoted Agriculturol Londs
ond Rurol Residentiol on the El
Dorodo County Generol plon Lond
Use Diogrom. The proposed Generol
Plon designotion for the plon Areo is
onticipoied io be "Adopted plon,'
which defers lond use guidonce cnd
governonce to o Specific plon
regulotion.

ZONING I The El Dorodo County
Zoning Ordinonce (Tiile 130 El Dorodo
County Code) includes oil the
regulotory ordinonces ond cerfoin
odministrotive ordinonces of El
Dorodo Counly ond estoblishes the
stondords for ihe enforcement of vorious code orficles. The El Dorodo county Lond DevelopmentMonuol (LDM) provides design stondords ond informotion regording ihe development of lcnd in thecounty' At the time of norrotive submittol opplicoiion, the porlion of the plon Areo in El Dorodo countyis zoned Agriculturol Grozing (4ooc.), Rurol Lond (40oc.). ond Rurol Lond (g0oc.) os shown on thecounty Assessors records. The Proposed zoning reguloiion for the plon Areo is onticipoled lo defer londuse guidonce ond governonce to Specific plon regulotion. ti:.. .,. a::.t'/"/ )
lond Use
{ ) 4r,;r-r71;;1 :lit-rql- F.jlntilY
Dwelling
Unils
c5.3 2e-5
Gross Areo
{Acres)
SFHD 1.1 7i-:1-rl. :- I 5inryie Fr:rr,-,i17 Hr!ir [rer r!j t,,, .! ?D.i (7' I 2Jtr/'-cl i*lulii-Frrrnili' -.w Derrlitv a{,.4 317 i Ll-20dul,rcl I'lr.rlli iLlr',,1y ille::lir-'pr fr6,1;rt.; I 1;.J 232 MHD i20--i!r1u/r:j.t \tutii Fcntily Jign Det'rsiiv 1,i..i ,rI 3,332
I
:24
AT-SFHD ;1-7 lL,,i,rr : ^.J+-l.xJ+li,i
S v b tot o I lro ditionol ResidenlioJ
;ingle Fcrrril' tr,jh t'--.,:.;i:i
68t.1
,,4.5
I
-MlD i7-i 2 {.1,,r/o':l A;e-Trr,,-rel:cl 1,,1._,,i;-FalrniJ./ Las J[r.Lr ;J.l D { 2r'r-_iiclJlltc ) A,';-=,ir.llg rtiil in1r,,lii-FcatrjI Hirjl i [,g1151ii 'r,l.t_t : 6al

4.1 830
I
Sublol(,l A ge -Tdrgefed Fesidenfioi
ri;-itjr1:,'/,:lr: & tr.5 F.qRl t"1ir-=:.j U!e V,:r,:l{le ,
j!ifltfi l-:i\ R+rir:J+tr,,-ri i --i.-t i-1-,;;r1;.rc,1; 149-5
rl.l,
GC ll.t..5 FA R i i ;errar.,:)r il rrrrrrrer:: jl.

Subiofof Ailtixed- else 32.6
I
ir i'r
i--'Jr,!plr: i I .ir :-4.:.'l t--rCr r:,1-i,:rIr.{ jfi;,.'js p.::r,r t_rr . Lril i.lni;,re*: ,.j t-i . r F Reseorch {j: F{i.li lrr:_Jlr;iriiull.-_if:ic- Fr.:r( tj:Se!tfrtli i.!. J PQF ill--i 'All F .ii-- r: il,l -.,':;i : r_rl,ii,- lUt]l:: .:iijhrrar]', t r-il 144
sublolol Coinmerciol & Ernp{oyirnen}
F Farlij
t35" I
I
it, 4
:_\i)et! il.1a:+
',ii,err i,l,lre qr:;,r E:id F{_:J.tij:-, 4:
i:JpFri -iiii:,-- L:Jnl!r.{ra,',rJf ,:lri a--,rrf ,J(}{ ir_.1 $ubtol6f Pdrkc &, Opem Spcce
C jrrj ,J l!.- i iU tr
1X&..&
I
su&toto, Clrq$lcrrior? d,,t{fsc 4&"2
x"45?..9 4,306
EASI P1AN AREA
Ag€-Ieg€lb*l lcenffEfl
GswxreH, eryb$tlefric*dc
FCl('tOgSgcee
CLcu$qr
tordt*eDeSn&r!3 sadrur
EA$ PTAH ANEA IOTAT
!Fopffinee**cilur hcbr3asb6€d6!l'le E &rs{to Co*nrfy €enecl pkr

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH crnd INDEPENDENCE
NEXT STEPS I The Community for Heclth ond lndependence will implement on inlegroted Mosier Plon with Specific Plons in eoch jurisdiction. specific Plons ore onticipoted to be prepored ond processed within their respective oreos of jurisdiction. The lond oreo within socromenio county (WEST PLAN AREA) is proposed to be processed ihrough the city of Folsom (onnexed to Folsom) ond will comply wiih city of Folsom requirements ond reloted LAFCo process. The lond oreo within El Dorodo county (EASI PLAN AREA) will be processed by El Dorodo County ond will comply with El Dorodo county requirements' While odvoncing on integroted moster plonned community, the wesi Plon Areo specif ic Plon ond the Eost Plon Areo Specif ic Plon willbe designed to odvonce the Generol Plon' ordinonces' ond objectives of eoch jurisdiction. To ensure o comprehensive environmentol review thot considers the whole of the integroted moster plonned community, it is onticipoted thot the city of Folsom ond El Dorodo couniy will coordinote ond prepore o single environmentol impoct report' pREIMlt.1ARy REVTFW i- pRCJECt'I.EEDBAcK I The pRoJEcT NARRATIVE is intended to provide on overview of the project vision ond the reseorch underlying iis comprehensive ond innovotive design ond project objectives. Preliminory review opplicotions will be submitted with eoch jurisdiciion ond include initiol project exhibits ond informoiion. After incorporoiing feedbock received from eoch jurisdiction ond the public during the preliminory review process, subsequent opplicoiions os required by eoch jurisdiction will be submifted.

PUBL.ICOUTREACHPLAI..]tCor'l;r/rji'l|iYlliVCLVFMil..j.|lAgencyondcommunityfeedbockon ihe development pton will be sought throughout the opplicotion process. The preliminory opplicotion willinclude community outreoch plons to.nrrr" eorly, meoningful, ond tronsporent public oulreoch throughout ihe opplicotion process in colloborotion with the city of Folsom ond El Dorodo county' ln oddition to public heorings with the respective jurisdictions' the project will olso offer informol informotionol meetings with sunounding communities'
HOUSlt,tG DivER.:tTy L RtGlCi!A1- HCijjtr\.tc r.lrEDS ALLCCATIOI".i iRl-iFiA) i one of the project's core gools is to promote c holisiicolly-designed community thot willoccommodcte seniors ond individuols with disobilities, empower more independent living' foster inclusivity' ond integrote heolthcore ond services for residenis. The project proposes o diverse ond vibront mix of housing ond will fill criticol houslng needs wiihin both jurisdictions, including housing for seniors ond individuols with speciol needs ond physicol ond/or developmentol disobilities. The project will olso oddress the significont need for offordcble housing in eoch jurisdiction ond is committed to including offordoble housing for oll income levels. Housing opportunities oitrcctive to working fomilies' multi-generoiionol fomilies, ond first-time homebuyers ore olso plonned within the project' FlscAL Bff.JrFtIS I With o bolonced ond unique lond use plon, the project opplicont is committed to ensuring thot the project provides o nei fiscol benefit to the city of Folsom ond El Dorodo county' The commerciol ond mixed-use components of the projeci will provide o new, significont. diversified' ond sustoinoble retcil tox <rnd soles tox bose for the city of Folsom ond El Dorodo county ond odvonce locol retoil development policies ond objectives. ln oddition, strotegicolly ploced indusiriol/office pork opportunities ore plonned neor the 200-ocre uc Dovis reseorch complex thot will oltroct odditionol business integrotion. with design ond omenities focused on wellness, the project will ottroct retoil offerings ond provide o unique experience distinct from ond complimentory to the existing communities ond regionol reioil oPtions.

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNfTY for HEALTH anct TNDEPENDENCE
The project oppliconl will provide the necesscry improvements ond funding mechonisms to ensure thotthe infrostructure' focilities, ond services for the project ore provided without c negotive fiscol impoct toihe city of Folsom' county of El Dorodo, or their existing residenrs. These commitments include providingprivctely owned ond mointcined focilities wiihin certoin residentiol communiiies ond estoblishingcommunity Focilities Districts ond other funding mechonisms io ensure odequote mcintenonce ondservices of no cosi to the ciry of Forsom, Er Dorodo county, or their residents.

JCB oPPcRTU\llTlES + CoMMUNITY BEI'IEFiT I The UC Dovis reseorch comptex is envisioned tobecome o world-closs center for the study of heolthy oging thot will olso creote diverse employmentopportunities' including professionol, medicol, clinicol. ond reieorch opportunifies ond supporting nursingond odminisirotive positions, os well os employment opporiuniiies outside the medicol field wiihcomplimentory commerciol uses. The employment-generoting lond uses ore onticipcied to provide onopproximotely I .5:l jobs-to-housing rotio.

Beyond revenue ond job opportunities, lhe communiiy will become o cenier for wellness ond heolthyliving thot will ollow residents throughoul the city of Folsom ond El Dorodo couniy to obtoin sfote-of-the-orf medicol focilities closer to home ond enjoy public porks ond gothering ploces, interconnected troils.ond green spoces, formers morkets, ond unique commerciol ond culturol offerings.

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY ror HEALTH cnc INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY for HEALTH onci INDEPENDENCE
fXPfRT CONTRIBUTORS I Alphcbeiizecl by lcsi nome
len Abbedulo, ph.D. I professor, Deportment of Psychiotry & Behoviorol Sqiences Director, UC Dovis MIND lnstitute' Veronicq Ahumodo-Newhorl, M.A., Ph.D. I Assistont Professor, Deportment of Pediotrics, UC Dovis Heolth' Bernodetle Auslin, M.S. I Former Executive Director UCD Center for Regionol Chonge' UC Dovis' Desiree Bqckmon, Dr.pH, M.S., R.D. I Chief of the Prevention Policy & Proctice Group ot the University of Colifornio' Dovis. Cenler for Heolthcore Policy & Reseorch.

Michele (Mike) Borboto, ph.D., p.E. I professor Structurql Engineering ond Structurol Mechonics, UC Dovis l Director' Climote lnitiotive, CITRIS ond the Bonoloo lnstitute
Gole Berkowitz, Ph.D. I Associote Director of cITRIS Heolth, UC Berkeley. cqlherine Brlnkley, Ph.D. I Foculty Director UCD center for Regionol chonge, UC Dovis' cqrl Blumslein, ph.D. I Executive Director of clTRls climqte ond the colifornio lnstitute for Energy & Environment (CIEE), UC BerkeleY.

Gino Dokko, Ph.D. I Professor. Groduote School of Monogemeni' UC Dovis' Holly Jimison, ph.D., F.A.C.M.|. I professor, Bouv6 college of Heolth sciences I Professor, Northeostern University Consortium on Technology for Prooctive Core I Visiiing Professor in Public Heolth Sciences ot I'JC Dovis' Neql Kohqlsu, M.D., M.p.H., tAcpM I Heolth strotegist in the Prevention Policy & Proctice Group within the center for Heollhcore policy & Reseqrch I Volunteer Clinicol Foculty, Deportmeni of Fomily & Community Medicine' UC Dovis' Dovid luborsky, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.S.A. I Vice choncellor of Humon Heolth sciences ond cEo for uc Dovis Heolth Dovid Lindemon. ph.D., M.S.W. I Director, Heolth lnitiotive, The center for lnformotion Technology Reseorch in the lnterest of Society, UC BerkeleY.

Sobrino loureiro, B.S. I Project Policy Anolyst, Center for Heolthcore Policy & Reseorch' UC Dovis' Thomos S. Nesbifi, M.D., M.p.H. I Emeritus Associqte Vice Choncellor for Strotegic Technologies & Allionces I Founding Director, Center for Heolth & Technology.

Joy Melnikow, M.D., M.p.H. I professor, Fomily & Community Medicine I Former Director of the Center for Heolthcore poiicy a Reseorch I Professor of Fomily & Community Medicine' UC Dovis' Morykote Miller, M.S. I Heqlth Policy Anolyst, center for Heolthcqre Policy & Reseorch, UC Dovis' Mishq povel, ph.D. I professor, Khoury College of Computer Sciences I Professor, Bouve College of Heolth Sciences I professor, Northeostern Unlversity Consortium on Technology for Prooctive Core I Visiting Professor in Public Heolth Sciences, UC Dovis.

Iherese peffer, ph.D. I Associote Director ot the Colifornio lnstitute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) within the Center for lnformoiion Technology Reseorch in the lnterest of society (clTRls), UC Berkeley' Bohrom Rovoni, ph.D., 8.S., M.S. I professor, Deporfment of Mechonicol & Aerospoce Engineering, UC Dovis' Dominique Rlfley, M.p.H. I senior Heqlth Policy Reseorcher, Heolih Policy Anolysis & Project Monogemeni. center for Heqlthcore Policy & Reseorch, UC Dovis Heolth.

Heolher M. Young, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N. I Professor ond Deon Emerito I Notionol Director' Betty lrene Moore Fellowship Progrom for Nurse Leoders ond lnnovotors
Iod slollz, MBA. I Direcior of Business Developmeni, uc Dovis Heolih. "t wan! this Projecf to give people lhe chonce lo live longer ond healthier lives, in their own homes, ond in lheir own communifies'

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY tor HEALTH ond INDEPENDENCE
COMMUNITY foT HEALTH
ONd INDEPENDENCE

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

ATTACHMENT 2
Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Process
and Folsom Annexation History

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

LAFCO Annexation Process Overview
Local. Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) is a countywide commission, required in each Catifornia county. Sacramento County LAFCO has authority over any Sphere of lnftuence Amendments or Annexations in Sacramento County'
The broad goats of the Commission's directive are to ensure the orderty f ormation of local governmental, agencies, to preserve agriculturaI and open space l'ands, and to discourage urban sprawl. Commissions must, by taw, create Municipat Service Reviews and Update Spheres of lnftuence for each independent tocat governmentat jurisdiction within their countywide jurisdiction Retevant Definitions and Acronyms
Municipat Service Review (MSR). Municipat Service Review is a study conducted by the commission documenting and anatyzing the services in a particutar geographic region or jurisdictionat area pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 56430 and Sacramento LAFCO's adopted tocal, poticy as permitted pursuant to subsection (a)(7) of section 56430.
a
a
Sphere of lnftuence (SOl). Sphere of lnftuence is a ptan for the probabte uttimate physicat boundaries and service area of a locaI agency, as deterrnined by the commission consistent with Government Code Section 56425'
Pre-zoning. Prezoning is the adoption of an anticipated zoning category prior to annexation to be effective subsequent to annexation
o Annexation. Annexation is the inctusion, attachment, or addition of territory to a city or district which is Governed by Government code section 65668.

Process/Logistics for a City to Request Sphere of lnftuence Amendment/Annexation A city, a landowne r, and/or registered voters can request a modification to a Sphere of lnftuence (SOl). Landowners can initiate this on their own without the city but at some point the city has to state whether they are in favor of the Sphere of lnftuence change or not.

Municipat service Review(s) are required before a city can change/update a Sphere of lnftuence, one or to anatyze abitity to provide services now and in the future. The Municipal Service Review woutd accompany the Sphere of lnftuence apptication but can atso be done in advance of a Sphere of lnftuence appl,ication. Sacramento county LAFCO has a poticy that the sphere of lnfluence is heard at a diff erent meeting than the Municipal service Review.

Sphere of lnftuence Amendments and Annexation are subject to the Catifornia Environmentat Quatity Act (CEQA).
ln any Sphere of lnftuence Amendment, the city and county have to meet and confer. Before LAFCO can adopt a Sphere of lnftuence amendment, there has to be agreement/resotution between the city and the county.

A pubtic hearing with LAFCO is required for both Sphere of lnfluence requests as wetl as Annexation requests.
1 Page 207
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

LAFCO Annexation Process Overview
LAFCO must consider the fottowing factors in determining the Sphere of lnftuence of each governmentaI agencY:
1 . The maximum possibl,e service area of the agency is based upon present and possibte service capabitities of the agency'

2. The range of services the agency is providing or coutd provide'

3. The projected future poputation growth of the area'

4. The type of devetopment occurring or ptanned for the area, including, but not limited to' residentiat, commercia[, and industriaI devetopment'

5. The present and probabte future service needs of the area'

6. Locat governmentaI agencies presentty providing services to such area and the present tevet, range and adequacy of services provided by such existing locaI governmental agencles.

The existence of sociaI and economic interdependence and interaction between the areas within the boundaries of a [oca[ governmental agency and the area which surrounds it and which coutd be considered within the agency's sphere of influence.

The existence of agricutturaI preserves in the area which coutd be considered within the agency,s sphere of inf [uence and the eff ect on maintaining the physicaI and economic integrity of such preserves in the event that such preserves are within a sphere of inftuence of a tocaI governmentaI agencY.

LAFCO Commisslon may put poticy conditions onto Sphere of lnftuence amendment that coutd affect annexation. once a Sphere of lnfluence is amended through LAFCO, the city can appty for the Annexation at any time. The city would need to pre-zone the area prior to LAFCO',s approval of the annexation. Betow is a simple ftow chart for the above-described process 7 8
. city needs to pre-zone the area prior to LAFCO approval of the annexatlon r lf detav has occurred, may require another CEQA anatysis' . Public Hearing Conducted.Annexation
& CEQA
. Once the SOI is amended through LAFCO, City may apply for the annexation at any time' sot
Adopted
. SOI Amendment Drafted per GC 56425 and is Subject to CEQA' . City/County must meet and confer and come to an agreement prior to acloption of the SOI . Public Hearing Conductedsol&
CEQA
. Request to Modify sol can be sutrmitted by the city, Landowner, and/or Registered voters' Request
Made
. Compteted per GC 56430, timetine is approximatety 1 year . Can be completed in advance or concurrentty with the SOIMSR Process
2 Page 208
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom Annexation HistorY
When Folsom incorporated in L946, development was largely restricted to the Historic District. By 1980, 35 years later, development had expanded east and north of the Historic District on both sides of the American River and the city limits had expanded south to Highway 50. When the last General Plan was adopted in 1988, Folsom had gone through a massive expansion; the city grew from a population of 5,g00 in 1970 to 23,000 in 1988 - quadrupling in size in less than 20 years. The previous L988 General Plan guided Folsom's continued growth for 30 years.
ln 2018 with a population over 77,OOO residents and city limits largely developed north of Highway 50, City Council adopted Folsom General Plan 2035 creating a blueprint for the City's growth and development over the next 20 years. That current General Plan incorporated 3,585 acres south of Highway 50 that were annexe d in 20L2 in conjunction with the adoption of the Folsom Plan Area Specific plan (after more than a decade of study, planning, analysis, and agreements). See the City's annexation history map on the following page and the chronology for the most recent annexation south of Highway 50.

Folsom Annexation Process to here of lnfluence South of Hiand the 50 1999 City Growth and Annexation Consideration. Growth area designated in SACOG BluePrint.

Discussion about whether the or Co should lan it.
2001 Sacramento LAFCO approved the City's application to expan with the condition for a comprehensive planning process to ensure the area is efficiently served, its valuable natural resources protected, and that "piecemeal" development is d it's Sphere of lnfluence (SOl)
avoided
Measure W passed by Folsom voters with 3 primary stipulations:
r The city must secure a new water supply for the area
o Current residents not be required to pay fees for construction of new infrastructure, including schools and roads, in the new community
o 3oo/oof the gross land area be maintained as natural open space forthe preservation of oak woodlands and sensitive habitat
2004
2005 Vision/Land Plannin Process Commenced procesmulti
2011 Folsom Plan Area S cific Plan Adopted and EIR Certifi ent Agreement Ado dDevelo 2012 Prezoning and Annexation Approved
20L3 Specific Plan Refinements, Open Space Management Plan, Public facilities and Financing Plan, Tentative Subdivision MaPlan AmendGuideli S
2015 Construction of phase 1 Backbone lnfrastructure SZSOH investment in water, sewer and mentsinfrastructure and iroa
First residential buildi ermits issued2011
First residential home occ ied2018
3 Page 209
04/23/2024 Item No.11.
1972
1972
1 968
1970
1984
1984
1 967
1993
2012
Datet 4ll0l24
Legend
J tg+t - ts4s
I tgso - 1ss4
I rgss - 1e61
f rsoz - 1e66
l_) tgot - reTz
'_l tstz - 1993
1994 - 2018
W
Annexation Boundaries
Ciry of Folsom 1947 - 2O1B
N
A0

1.-{) t,Fi{).\1
2 4
4 Miles

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

ATTACHMENT 3
Staff Analysis of Project Narrative Relative to Folsom Adopted Plans and Policies

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) p
Guiding Principles #6: Enhance gateways into Folsom
Guiding Principle ff3: Promote town centers as soclal
gathering places
Guiding Principle #9: Provide all residents with opportunifies to live an active, healthy, and green lifestyle
Guiding Principle #10: Provide for a range of attractive and viable transportation options, such as bicycling, walking, rail, and transit
Guiding Principle #11: Provide a range of housing choices for all generations
lnformation
FOTSOM 2035 GENERAT PIAN
lnsufficient lnformation, lt is not clear from the proposal howthis project would enhance theinto Folsom
lnsufficient lnformation. There is not a lot of i
regarding the mixed-use village. Unlike the Folsom Town center, which is located in the center of Folsom Ranch, the mixed-use village is located at the north end of the land use plan away from the research complex and residential development in the south. HoweveL there is a proposed mixed-use village proposed in El Dorado County adjacent to the research complex and near the nformation in the ProPosal
southern residential area
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal provides a great deal of information on "Blue Zones" and healthy communities. However, there is insufficient information on how this type of development would be achieved. There is much discussion this topic but few concrete details other than the land use lan
I nco nsistent/l nsufficient lnformation. A variety of tra ns portation mo discussed and trails and streets with bike lanes are identified. However, there is no detailed information in the proposal about how this area would be served by transit. lt is outside of Sacramento Regional Transit's current service area and based on recent discussions with RT staff the proposed BRT line for the Folsom Plan Area (FPA) is unlikely to happen any time in the near future given the lower density development in the eastern half of the FPA and the lower density development that makes up the majority of the development in this des are
roposal
Consistent. As discussed later in this analysis, the proposed land use plan has a variety of land use designations for different housing types. Approximately 47% of the land is zoned for single-family housing. While this is higher than in the Folsom Plan Area (36%1, the proposed plan has more land for multi-family developmenl(12%l compared to the Folsom Plan Area (IO%1. lt also proposes to have a much higher level of acreage associated with age-restricted develos%l menttL%l compared to the Folsom Plan Area
1Page 212
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Guiding Principle #13: Foster economic growt
to become recognized as one of the smartest cities in the region
h and diversity
Guiding PrinciPle #14: Commit to high-quality design
Guiding Principle #15: Foster a sustainable community for the next generation's benefit

2. Land Use Element
Goal LU1.l Retain and Enhance Folsom's quality
unique identity, and sense of community while continuing to grow and change.
of life,
applying for annexation of lands to demonstrate the financial benefit to the CitY.

Policy 1U1.1.3 Annexation and Services. Requlre applicants Policy 1U1.1.5 Specific Plans. Require the adoption
lans for new growth areas specific
of
FOLSOM2035 GENERAT PIAN
and surt economicin Folsom
Consistent/l nsufficient lnformation.
rffu
split
llvd
across
eveo
the
ped
two
with
counties
researc
to
h
be
facil
T
own
itie
he
s,
ed
p
th
by
ts
UC
cou
roposal
td
DavS
nclud
beco
fo
m
es
a
ea
tota
resea
reglo
rch
of
na
200
com
dra
p
W
ex.
acres
lnsufficient lnformation. The design
at this time. The land use plan itself i
of the homes and buildings is not known
s similar to that of the Folsom Plan Area
and other master Planned communities
amount of lower-denshousi slle-fam
I nconsistent/l nsufficient lnformatio n
owever,
p
p
a
gen
rti
deve
e
c
lo
u
roposed
ration
rly
pl
s,
a
pment
n
grve
d
n
o
partic
featu
es
u
its
res
not
rly
th
locati
at
o
ho
have
n,
co
se
ul
ma
d
ack
ny
that
of
ben
deta
have
efit
Th
easy
s
e
ils
p
a
peci
existi
acce
a
rop
SS
ng
bout
os
e
to
al
ld
how
needs
ide
pub
t
erly
li
H
c
WO
resr
u
tra
ntifies
d
NS
b
it,
e
dents
many
SU
an
an
the
d
d
sta
pote
fu
tn
the
a
tu
b
ntial
re
le
Consistenconsistent/lnsufficientlnformation
the potential to enhance the quality of life for Folsom's seniors and other residents with cognitive or neurological challenges. However, it is unclear how this conceal annexation proI will achieve this unue id
I nsufficient lnformatio n.
nnovativeandmuchneeded
The
tn
"Bl
th
ue
e
Zon
regio
e"
notven
concept
th
p
e
re
agi
SC
ngp
nted
o
n
pulati
the
on.It
proposal
has
ts
lnsufficient lnformation. Requires detailed financial ana benefit. lf UC Davis owns the industrial/office park site, will it create any property tax revenue for the city? what will be the tax-sharing arrangement with Sacramento County upon annexation? Without a financial analysis it is unclear whether the project would be revenue neutral or revenue positive for the city. Regardless, the project applicant understands that no annexation will roved that results in a loss of revenue to the be
lysis to demonstrate
Consistent. The applicant understands that a Specific Plan would be required 2Page 213
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy LU1.1.10 Network of Open Spaces' Ensure
designated open space is connected whenever feasible with the larger community and regional network of natural
systems, recreational assets, and viewsheds'
Policy 1U1.1.15 SACOG Blueprint Principles. Strive to adhere to the Sacramento Regional Blueprint Principles.

FOLSOM 2035 GENERAL PLAN
Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The proposed project and open space, much of it centered around Carson Creek and Deer Creek. lt has a trail connection to White Rock Road/ Capital Southeast Connector and presumably to the Folsom Plan Area trail network, but it is unclear how that connection would be made given the width of the roadway there. The trails do connect to the open space in the part ofthe proposed development in El has connected trails
Dorado Co
lnconsistent. The Regional Blueprint Growth Principles include:
o TransportafionChoices
o Mixed-UseDevelopments
r Compact Development
o Housing Choice and DiversitY
o Use of Existing Assets
r Quality Design
r Natural Resources Conservation
While the proposed project has the potentral to be consistent with many of the principles, there is insufficient information in the proposal about how it will ensure it achieves these principles. However, since many of the principles focus on the reduction of auto trips, this project is inconsistent with several of the principles given that it is outside the urban services boundary of Sacramento County, not served by public transit, and is not identified as a growth area in the Blueprint or the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/sustainable Communities Strategy. ln addition, the southern portion of the area below Carson Creek is still under the Williamson Act (Contract # 69-AP-016), according to the Sacramento County Assessor. That means those parcels are currently being used for agricultural or grazing purposes and have not yet begun the lengthy non-renewal process. Finally, the area is included in the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan. Co
3Page 214
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Goal LU 5.1 Allow.a variety of housing types an
that provide choices for Folsom residents, create complete and livable neighborhoods, and encourage walking and
biking.
d mix of uses
esta blish ment of "compl ete neighborhoods" that i ntegrate schools, childcare centers, parks, shopping and employment centers, and other amenities.

Policy LU 6.l.1ComPlete Neighborhoods. Encourage the
Policy LU 6.1.5 Senior and Convalescent Hous
the development of independent living, assisted living, and convalescent housing facilities that provide health care for seniors. Proposed facilities shall be evaluated based on the location and impacts on services and neighboring properties, and not on a density basis. lndependent living facilities should be located in walkable environments to improve the ing. Encourage
health and access of residents.

Policy LU 6.1.7 Residential densities in Area Plans
Specific Plans. Allow residential densities within an area plan or specific plan to vary, provided that the overall dwelling unit buildout within the plan area shall not exceed that authorized by the General Plan
and
FOLSOM2035GENERAtPtAN
parks and open space may encourage walking and biking within the development including the portion of the proposal that is in El Dorado county However, outside of the project area most residents would be dependent on automobiles as this area is closest to the Capital Southeast connector and the future ,,Road to the west" that would connect to Latrobe Road in El Dorado I nconsistent/l nsufficient lnformation'
however,
u
is
fo
a
5e5
si
variety
ng
arge
with
of
tn
lan
le-fam
area
du
that
ilv
n
SC
(s
th
S
e
F)
rea
th
a
a
at
nd
pa
S
rt
WO
northeast
uld
a
from
SU
re
p
ngle-Fam
two
of
ilv
port
H
As
d
neig
he
h
igh
iffe
bo
pla
re
n
noted
Den
nt
rhood
hat
sity
hou
ls
st
bove,
SFH
ng
th
excl
parks.

D)
ty
us
p
pe
The
S;
with
ively
tra
ropos
d
il
a
no
s
es
inc
tgn
othe
lu
system
la
ated
des
the
a
nd
re
County
east of Payen Rd. (Village Parkway) and west of the Sacramento county boundary that is exclusively single-family and slngle-family high density without any other land uses except for two parks unlike the rest of the land use lnconsistent. While most of the proposed land use
neighborhoods including land for single-family, mu
office, mixed-use development, and parks and ope
plan show comPlete
Iti-family, commercial,
n space, there is a large area
plan
age-restricted development, the land use plan is similar to that of the Folsom Plan Area and other larger master plans in our region. Apart from the vision and guiding principles, the proposal lacks detailed informafion about how it Consistent/l nsuffi cient I nformatio n.
d
SC
is
conce
rvlces
pt
ities
of
are
"B
o
ncl
lue
udi
rgan
7o
ngn
ized
ne
EU
Co
around
mmuniti
the
ro-diverse
ne
es"
nd
Th
ed
w
s
e
tvtd
th
p
of
ua
co
se
ls
n
ropos
to
mm
a
u
rs
is
Apart
o
nity
and
rga
pe
n
from
design,
zed
rson
the
S
a
Wit
rou
168.
housi
h
7 nd
ng
c
an
he
d
resof
would satisfy this
Consistent. The proposed densities in the
consistent with those currently allowed in
land use plan for the area are
the City's 2035 General Plan.
4Page 215
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 201"8; Amended in 2021) Policy LU 8.1.1lndustrial Expansion. Promote an
the maintenance and expansion of Folsom's employment
sector in areas where services are readily available,
including: adequate water, wastewater, and storm drainage facilities as well as easy access to multiple modes of
transn.
d assist in
Policy LU 8.1.3 Clusters, Encourage complementary
businesses and businesses from the same industry to locate in Folsom. These business clusters will benefit from shared resources, a pool of skilled employees, secondary support and concentrated marketing efforts industries,
Policy LU 8.1.5 Transit' Encourage new employment uses to locate where they can be easily served by public transit.

Transit centers should be incorporated into the project, when appropriate
Goal LU 9.1 Encourage community design that results in a distinctive, high-quality built environment with a character that creates memorable places and enriches the quality of life of Folsom's residents.

FOTSOM 2035 GENERAT PTAN
is how this would affect the retention of existing medical, office and retail use in Folsom, particularly in the Folsom Plan Area, lt has the potential to complement those uses and provide additional land for expansion of existing businesses or new businesses. However, it is also possible that it could reduce or slow the development of subsequent phases of UC Davis' Folsom Center for Health on East Bidwell in the Folsom Plan Area in favor of the 200-acre location Goal LU 8.1 Encourage, facilitate, and supportthe location oflnsufficient lnformation. The proposal i facilities as well as sites for other comm
ncludes land for medical research
ercial and office uses. What is not clear
to the southeast.
office, creative industry, technology, and industrial uses and retention of existing industry in appropriate locations' available or where there is easy access to multiple modes of transportation lnconsistent.
sector, employment
while
it
the
doesn
propo
ot
saI
do
wo
soI
ul
n
dh
n
elp
re
p
a
ote
whe
ntial
re
ly
serV
expa
ces
nd
a
Fo
rere
so
ad
m's
ly
approximately 100 acres in the project on
additional 100 acres on the El Dorado
County side that would be owned by UC Davis for a medical research complex' This would add to the increasing concentration of health care facilities in the area and the lower densities of the proposed development, it anticipated Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. lf the Blue Zone concept is rea proposed in the land use plan, then this could result in a community that enriches the quality of life for future Folsom residents. However, since no development partner is identified in the proposal it is not clear how the Blue Zone concept will be achieved given that the applicant is not a housing deveer,
lized as
that most workers would commuteautomobile
lnconsistent. The proposed project is lo
Transit's service area. Given the limited
cated outside of Sacramento Regional
amount of development surrounding
Consistent. The proposal identifi es
the Sacramento CountY side and an
Folsom.
5Page 216
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy LU 9.1.10 Renewable and Alternative Energy
Generation Systems. Require the use of solar, wind, or
other on-site renewable energy generation systems as part of the design of new planned developments.

3. Goal M 1.1 Provide a comprehensive, integ
connected network of transportation facilities and services for all modes of travel that also incorporates emerging transportation technologies and services to increase
tra nsportation system efficiency'
rated, and
Policy M 1.1.1 Complete Streets. Develop its streets to serve the needs of all users, including bicyclists, public transit users, children, seniors, persons with disabilities, pedestria ns, motorists,and movers of commercialods
M 1.1.5 Connected Neighborhoods. Require the
continuation of the street network between adjacent
development projects to promote walkability and allow
easier access for evehicles
Policy M 1.1.3 Accessibility. Strive to ensure that all streets are safe and accessible to people with limited mobility and other disabilities. New and reconstructed facilities shall meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

FOI.SOM 2035 GENERAL PIAN
Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. Since t
Green Building Code require rooftop solar for new single-family homes, it is anticipated that many of the homes will be able to generate power to offset energy use. Additional opportunities for alternative energy generation may be ssible but would be dent on what individual develoPersro he California Building Code and
lnformation
lnconsistent. The project depicts major arterial street con Ranch Road and to Savannah Parkway. Savannah Parkway is intended to be a limited-access (right turns only) intersecfion at the capital southeast Connector in order to meetthe Connector's intent of being a limited access, high speed expressway. Both Savannah Parkway and Empire Ranch Road were planned and designed to meet the needs of the Folsom Plan Area and did not envision regional connections such as this.

The project also shows a major east-west facility that appears to extend past the project's western boundary but does not specify where that roadway goes or where it connects to.

These impacts would need to be assessed in a traffic study and environmental nections to EmPire
rt. Refer to thes below. oconsistea nal
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal discusses comp
would include sidewalks and bike lanes and it includes example street cross sections. However, more detailed information would be needed to ensure that complete streets are desed and built throuthe area
lete streets, which
Would need to review proposed subdivision plans to
assess connectivity, and/or have a policy statement in a Specific Plan lnsufficient lnfo
lnsufficient lnformation. A critical part of the "Blue Zone" concept is projects that serve the mobility needs of seniors and persons with disabilities The proposal discusses this, but additional details would be needed to understand how it will achieve the policy objective here particularly if public transit is not easiavailable
for
6Page 217
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 202L) M 1.1.5 lntermodal Connections' Provide con
between modes, including bicycle and pedestrian
connections to transit stops, buses that can accommodate bicycles, and park-and-ride lots.
nections
M 1.1.11 Historic Southern Pacific Rail Right-of-way
Facilitate use of the Southern Pacific Rail right-of-way for multi-modal transportation
Goal M 2.1 Maintain and expand facilities and programs
encourage people to walk and bike in safety and comfort and support the lifestyle and amenities that Folsom residents that
value
Policy M 2.1.2 New Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be built along all new arterial, collector, and local roads when ultimate street improvements are installed
Policy M'2.1.1 Pedestrian Master Plan' Maintain and
implement a pedestrian master plan that guides the
development of a network that links residential
developments with employment centers, public open
spaces, parks, schools, shopping districts, and other major destinations.

FOLSOM 2035 GENERAL PLAN
I nconsistent/l nsuffi cient lnformation. While the proposa transportation modes, as discussed elsewhere in this analysis, there are no details about how public transit would be provided to this area or where park- and-ride lots would be located. The plan discusses that an extension of bus rapid transit (BRT) would be defined in the future, but no time frame is provided. The proposal does include information on bike lanes and a helpful s section should Class lV and Class I bike trails cros
ldiscusses multiple
lnconsistent. City Council recently directed staff to re license agreement with the Placerville & Sacramento
on a portion of the sacramento Placerville Transportation corridor (sPTC), which runs directly through the middle of the proposed project. The proposed development is incompatible with the rail operation, and the developer should be required to install at-grade rail crossing equipment on all public street crossings of the SPTC and contribute towards the cost of a rail grade crossing or new an excursion rail
Valley Railroad (PSVRR),
den at theI Southeast Connector
Refer to the policy consistency analysis below I nsufficient lnformation lnsufficient information. Would need to review proposed roa sections for arterial and collector streets
dway cross
lnconsistent. The Active Transportation Plan would need to be updated to incorporate this development.
7Page 218
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Pedestrian and Bicycle Linkages in New
Require developers to provide a system of
ls, and bikeways that link all land uses, provide
accessibility to parks and schools, and connect to all existing or planned external street and trail facilities'
Policy M 2.1.3
Development.
sidewalks, trai
Policy M 2.1.5 Bikeway Master Plan Maintain a
implement a bikeway master plan that guides the
development of a network that links residential
developments with employment centers, public open
spaces, parks, schools, shopping districts, and other major nd
destinations
Policy M 2.1.6 Bicycle Facility Classifications
Maintain the following classification of bicycle facilities consisting of the following:

1. Class I bikeways: separated bicycle paths. These will be the preferred bikeway, whenever feasible.

2. Class ll bikeways: bike lanes. These will be required in areas where on-street parking is likely to occur and, in all collector; and arterial streets where feasible. Such areas would be in the vicinity of apartment complexes and
condominium comPlexes.

3. Class lll bikeways: bike routes' These will be required in low-traffic areas where it is safe for bicycles to share the lane with autos and a class 1 or class 2 facility is not.feasible'

4. Class lV bikeways: bicycle-only paths, or "cycle tracks'" These are a version of separated bicycle paths that are designed for and limited to bicycle use only and include a separation between bikeway and through traffic lanes. These will only be installed in special cases where right-of-way is constricted, or there is other significant need to provide a serate facilforuse
FOTSOM 2035 GENERAL PIAN
c Plan
Consistent/l nsufficient i nformation
S
Cou
ites
syste
system
m
nty
T
s
a
n
he
nd
de
the
bi
of
Fo
the
proposal
keways
som
t
P
rea
la
cks
hat
n
AS
co
wel
Area
nform
AS
an
nnect
ati
d
o
to
to
no
Th
the
thro
n
the
p
m
ugh
how
deve
ixed
su
it
b
-u
roposa
lop
wo
se
seq
me
ul
VI
d
nt
nclu
uent
llage
on
con
des
su
th
st
n
e
d
nect
p
EI
bdivis
to
D
dewa
lo
rop
o
n
the
I ks,
os
rad
a
an
o
ed
d
tra
tra
school
incorporate this develoPment.
nt. The Active Transportation Plan would need to be uPdated to lnsufficient information. Would need to review proposed roadway cross sections for arterial and collector streets
8Page 219
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy M z.L.tO Bicycle Parking. Require a
and long-term bicycle parking for all land uses, except for sifamiland sih density residential uses e-famih
dequate short-
Policy M 2.t.L4lntersections. Ensure new i
designed to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, alowith all other traortation modes.
ntersections are
Policy M z.l.t2TrailNetwork. Develop a
interconnected sYstemof trails and bi
continuous,
Policy M 2.1.t6 Safe Routes to School. Encourage
construcfion of facilities and provision of programs that ensure Folsom children can walk or bike to school safely through coordination with school administration and parent organizations and participation in State and Federal grant ms
the
Policy M 2.t.17 Pedestrian and Bicycle Overpasses. Pursue the development of pedestrian and bicycle overpasses in areas with limited connectivity, particularly to connect develoment north and south of Hhway 50.
and integrated transit system that responds to the needs of all residents and allow frequent and convenient travel
throughout the citY and region.

Goal M 3.1 Support and maintain a comprehensive, safe,
Policy M 3.1.1 Access to Public Transit' Strive to ensure that all residents have access to safe and convenient public transit options.

FOTSOM 2035 GENERAT PIAN
lnsufficient lnformation.
lnsuffi cient information.
lnsuffi cient information.
lnsufficient information.

Not applicable to proposed development. However, the project may n assess the need for, and potentially contribute to the cost of, a bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing of the capital southeast connector, eed to
micro-transit and a future extension of a planned BRT line from the Folsom Plan Area. Since this area is outside of Sacramento Regional Transit's current service area it is not clear whether RT has the capacity to serve this area with its SmaRT Ride micro-transit service. ln addition, as mentioned elsewhere in this analysis, RT staff have indicated that bus rapid transit or BRT is unlikely to be provided in the Folsom Plan Area particularly in the southeastern part of the route due to the low densities in the area. As a result, future extension of BRT to serve this area is unlikely. The applicant would need to prepare a transit master plan to identify transit needs and infrastructure, and connectivity to adjacent transit providers including El Dorado Transit, Sacramento Regional I nconsistent/l nsufficient I nformation. The p ro posal mentions co m mu nity Transit and Paratransit
lnsufficient information.

IPage 220
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy M 3.1.3 Regional Transit Connectivity' Coordinate with Sacramento Regional Transit and neighboring
jurisdictions on fixed route connectivity and transfers to the transitm.

Policy M 3.1.2 Transit for Elderly and Persons with
Disabilities. Continue to provide accessible, on-demand transit for the eldandns with disabilities
Goal M 4.1 Ensure a safe and efficient network of streets for cars and trucks, as well as provide an adequate supply of vehicle park
Policy M 3.1.7 Transit to Key Locations. Provide Folsom Stage Line transit stops and associated amenities at key destinations in Folsom
Policy M 3.1.5 "Hi-Bus" Transit Corridors. Require sufficient right-of-way for designated Hi-Bus transit corridors that connect to light rail stations, including the planned facility on Easton Valley Parkway, south of Highway 50. The City shall also evaluate the feasibility of Hi-Bus transit in designated "study corridors" and shall give priority to transit uses within the available right-of-way in those study corridors' The City shall coordinate with Regional Transit to provide services in the Hi-Bus corridors.

FOLSOM 2035 GENERAT PIAN
lnsufficient informafion
lnsufficientn.
lnconsistent. Would need to prepare a transit master plan to needs and infrastructure, and connectivity to adjacent transit providers includiional Transit and Paratransit. El Dorado TransSacramento idenfify transit
I nsufficient information.
lnsufficient lnformation.
10Page 221
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) M 4.1.1 Road Network Hierarchy. Establish a hi
roads consisting of the following:

1. Freeways or limited access highways. Such roads shall be grade separated at each intersection with another road' The major purpose of such roads is to route traffic around
Folsom, with as few interruptions to the surface street system as possible. Highway 50 currently meets the
definition of a freewaY.

2. Expressways. Allow for moderate- to high-speed travel within the city. The purpose of an expressway is to carry cross-town traffic from other communities or between
neighborhoods within the city. An expressway may contain some grade-separated intersections, but this type of road would mainly be a surface street. Expressways should be located to allow for controlled intersections spaced at one- half mile intervals or more. Only arterial and collector roads should intersect with an expressway'

3. Arterial roads (or major streets)' Serve to connect
neighborhoods within the city and the city with surrounding communities. Movement of people and goods, also known
as "mobility," rather than access to adjacent land uses, is the primary function of an arterial street' Arterials would normally define the boundaries of neighborhoods, not
provide internal access to a neighborhood. The city has two types: L) "major arterials", which are typically divided four or six-lane roadways, and 2) "minor arterials," which are
typically undivided four-lane roadways.

4. Collector (or secondary) roads. Serve to route traffic from local streets within a residential neighborhood or a
commercial area to an arterial road. Collector streets would not normally serve as "through" roads for more than one area, but would typically carrY
higher traffic volumes than local streets. The City has two " which arecatwo-lane
erarchy of
s; 1) "major coll
lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation' Project includes a major road intersecting with Capital Southeast Connector at Savannah Parkway, which is designed and intended as a limited access (right turn only) intersection.

Savannah Parkway is designed as a minor arterial to serve adjacent residential land uses and not to carry sub-regional traffic'
11Page 222
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Folsom which are typically two-lane roadways without center turn lanes.

5. Local (or tertiary) roads' Serve a portion of a
neighborhood only and, together with other local roads in a route traffic to a collector street. neorhood,
nd 2) "minor collectors," roadways with center turnlanes, a transit vehicles. The City shall implement a pavement
management plan that considers warmer temperatures'
heat waves, and urban heat island effects in material
selection, and emphasize preventative maintenance to
reduce costs associated with frequent road surface
foril
Policy
accord
U
in
M
5e
c
IS,
to

4.1.2 tnc
ndu
Roa
udi
stry
ng
dway
standard
pedestri
s
an
to
s,b
Maintenance
provi
rcyc
d
M
e
at
ists,
fo
d
ntain
the
nvers,
safe
and
roadways
trave
lacement.
traffic Level of Service "D" (or better) for local streets and roadways throughout the City. ln designing transportation improvements, the City will prioritize use of smart
technologies and innovative solutions that
maximize efficiencies and safety while minimizing the
physical footprint. During the course of Plan buildout, it may occur that temporarily higher Levels of Service result where roadway improvements have not been adequately phased as development proceeds' However, this situation will be
minimized based on annual traffic studies and monitoring programs. Staff will report to the City Council at regular intervals via the Capital lmprovement Program process for the Council to prioritize projects integral to achieving Level Policy M 4.1.3 Level of Service.Strive to achieve at least a of Service D or better,
FOTSOM2035GENERALPIAN
miles of new roads, trails, and sidewalk faci
maintenance. City does not currently have
on this additional maintenance burden'
staff,
owever, NotpplicabletoproposeddevelopmentH
lities
b
that
udget
the
WOU
o
td
pro
re
req
so
ject
u
uire
wo
rces
ul
on
d
to
-go
add
take
ng
lnsuffi cient I nformationPendlnca
at
detai
the
led
City
raffic
has
mpact
adoptedRou
analysisof
ndabo
key
ut intersections. lt should be noted th
Policy that should be applied here.
12Page 223
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy M 4.1.4 Capital Southeast Connector
planning and construction of the Capital Southeast
Connector
Support the
Policy M 4.1.5 Interchange lmprovements
Caltrans in planning for and funding freeway interchange improvements and additional interchanges along Highway

50. Coordinate with
Policy M 4.1.7 Landscape Maintenance
Agreements. Require the establishment of homeowner's
associations or landscaping and lighting districts for new developments adjacent to arterial roads to ensure that
ntinstrips are constructed andmaintained
Assessment
Policy M 4.1.8 Energy Efficiency. Use
efficient light fixtures and technology for all traffic signals, streetlights, roads, intersections, and bicycle and pedestrian slals
the most energy-
Policy M 4.1.10 Traffic Calming' Continue to implement
traffic calming measures in residential neighborhoods, as appropriate and in ways that accommodate emergency
access vehicles.

Policy M 7,1.1 New Development. Require new
development to contribute towards the construction of
offsite facilities and provision of services to achieve the City's mobials
Goal M 7.1 Provide sufficient funding to construct, mainta and operate transportation facilities and services needed to io,
mobil achieve thels
FOL.SOM 2035 GENERAT PIAN
access (right turn only) intersection. Project may need to be conditioned to contribute to cost of connector project and possibly to build some of the D3b ncludes a major road interse
h Parkway, which is designed
cting with CaPital Southeast
and intended as a limited
asaiment
lnconsistent. Project i
Connector at Savanna
lnsufficient lnformation. A detailed traffic a
to be conducted and include an assessment
nalysis of the project would need
of traffic imPacts to the EmPire
Ranch, and East Bidwell interchanges. lt is likely that the development would have considerable impacts to both, and the developer should be assessed an rovements to both fee to helfund i
lnsufficient lnformation.
lnsufficient lnformation.
lnsufficient lnformation.

I nsuffi cient I nformation. The a pplica nt u nderstands this area would be required to contribute to off-site facilities and construct backbone infrastructure to meet the city's mobility goals, mitigate traffic andctP fair share towardsrojects in the
that any develoPment in
Refer to policy consistency analysis below
13Page 224
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts {Adopted August 20L8; Amended in 202L}

4. Economic
Pof icy M 7.t.2 Fair Share for Transportation
lmprovements. Require all new development to dedicate
rights-of-way, construct facilities, or pay its fair share for needed tra nsportation i nfrastructu re i m prove ments that support all travel modes, including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities, roadway improvements, and ITS and
transportation demand management (TDM) programs and
servlceS
lnfrastructure
Goal EP 2.1 Support efforts to increase employment in
Folsom by encouraging the retention, attraction, and
nsion of privatesector businesses
Goal EP 3.2 Provide opportunities for expansion of
businesses by ensuring the availability of suitable sites, appropriate zoning, and access to infrastructure and
amenities
Policy EP 2.1.1 New Employment. Encourage
research and development, industrial, and office employers to locate in Folsom to provide more job opportunities for Folsom residents.
professional,
Policy EP 3.2.1 Land Supply lnventory. Maintain an
adequate land supply and facilitate preparation of buildable, ready-to-develop sites to meet projected employment and retail land demand. This shall include identifying a large site for the develoent of coa rters
Goal H-lTo provide an adequate supply of suitable sites for the development of a range of housing types to meet the housneeds of allments of the population

5. FOLSOM ZO35 GENERAI PLAN
nsufficient lnformation
I nsufficient I nformation. The a ppl icant understa
this area would be required to dedicate ROW co
to backbone infrastructure improvements. For example, this could include contributions to construction of the Empire Ranch interchange at US Highway 50, mitigate traffic impacts, and pay fair share towards projects in city clP the City ClP.
nds that any develoPment in
nstruct facilities, or contribute
Consistent. Refer to the policy consistency analysisbelow.

Consistent. The proposal includes 115 acres of land, of be owned by UC Davis, for a medical research complex
which 100 acres would
and office parks. Given
the large amount of land dedicated to these uses, it is anticipated that this would provide a significant number of job opportunities to Folsom residents as those elsewhere in Sacramento and El Dorado Cou well as Consistent. This would increase Folsom's supply of land available major employers and shopping. As noted above, the proposal includes l"L5 acres of land designated for medical research and office park uses as well as 30 acres for a lifestyle center with shopping, restaurants, and other retail. for both
Consistent. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below Refer to the policy consistency analysis below. lnsufficient I nformation lnformation
14Page 225
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy H-l.l Sufficient Land for Housing. The City shall ensure that sufficient land is designated and zoned in a range of residential densities to accommodate the City's regional share of housing.

Goal H-3 To facilitate affordable housing opportunities to serve the needs of people at all income levels who live and work in the community.

Policy H-l.3 Multi-family Housing Densities. The City shall encourage home builders to develop their projects on multi- family-designated land at the high end of the applicable densrange
Policy H-3.8 Development Agreements. Where appropriate, the City shall use development agreements to assist housing develoin comwith City affordable housils
Policy H-3.2 lnclusionary Housing. The City shall continue to require inclusionary housing on all new for-sale units. The City may also consider inclusionary housing as a community benefit for non-City-initiated General Plan and/or Specific Plan amendments that result in rental housi
Policy H-5.1 Affordable Housing for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities. The City shall strive to ensure adequate and affordable housing for seniors and persons with
disabilities, particularly in areas near public transportation, and other essential services and facilities ping, medica s Goal H-5 To provide a range of housing services for Folsom residents with special needs, including seniors, persons with disabilities, single parents, large families, the homeless, and residents with extremelow incomes.

FOLSOM 2035 GENERAL PIAN
I nconsistent/l nsufficient lnformation. The project does p for housing development. However, there are two issues of concern: First, any annexation will likely lead to an additional increase in the City's share of the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA). Second, to satisfy the RHNA, the City needs more multi-family zoned land and less single-family zoned land. rovide additional land
This land use plan does not do that.
lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below. lnsufficient lnformation. The City will continue to encourage this; however, it is worth noting that the City is working with the landowners in the Folsom Plan Area to increase densities in the Town Center area beyond 30 du/ac. This I has a maximum denfor multi-fami roent at 30 du/ac.

Consistent. The applicant understands that they will be subject to development agreements related to inclusionary housing.
lnsufficient lnformation. While the project will be subject to the City's inclusionary housing ordinance and related development agreements, it is not clear whether this housing will be built or whether developers will pay in-lieu fees to the City as most developers have done in the Folsom Plan Area. lnsufficient lnformation. No affordable housing plan was included with the proposal. The proposal would be subject to the City's inclusionary housing ordinance, but it is not clear whether developers would pay in-lieu fees or build affordable units.

Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below.
15Page 226
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy H-5.2 Support Service for Seniors' The City shall encourage community service and support actrvities that increase the ability of seniors to remain in their homes.

Goal H-6 To ensure equal housing opportunities for all
Folsom residents regardless race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial disabilior source of income.

Policy H-5.3 Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities' The City shall encourage private efforts to remove physical barriers and improve accessibility for housing units and residential neighborhoods to meet the needs of persons
with disabilities.

Goal H-7 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote conservation in residential deve
Policy H-5.3 Balance of Housing Types. The City shall
encourage residential projects affordable to a mix of
household incomes and disperse affordable housing projects throughout the city, including the Folsom Plan Area, to achieve a balance of housing in all neighborhoods and
communities.

Goal NCR 3.2 lmprove the sustainability of the community through continued local efforts to reduce GHG emissions.

6. Natural And Cultural Resources Cha
Policy H-7.2 Smart Growth, The City shall encourage "smart growth" that accommodates higher density residential uses near transit, bicycle-, and pedestrian-friendly areas of the city that encourage and facilitate the conservation of
resourcesreducithe need for automobile use
FOTSOM 2035 GENERAL PLAN
Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal is focused on development to serve the needs of seniors and persons with disabilities. More details are needed to understand how this will be accomplished.

Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal is focused development that would allow seniors to remain in their homes rather than have to move out to special care facilities. More details are needed to understand how this will be accoished.
lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below.
lnsufficient lnformation. There is no detailed information about housing affordability levels. Housing prices and rents will be determined by the market.

The plan does not include any sites for deed-restricted affordable housing though there is acreage set aside for age-restricted development. lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below lnconsistent. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below. nsufficient lnformation
lnconsistent. The project is likely to lead to greater automobile use given its location at the edge of Sacramento County and the predominance of lower density development proposed near White Rock Road.
16Page 227
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) NCR 3.1.3 Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Encourage
to reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). These efforts could include encouraging mixed-use development promoting a jobs/housing balance, and encouraging
alternative transportation such as walking, cycling, and efforts
public transit
NCR 3.2.3 6reenhouse Gas Reduction in New Development.

Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from new development by encouraging development that lowers vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and discouraging auto-dependent sprawl and
dependence on the private automobile; promoting
development that is compact, mixed-use, pedestrian
f rie ndly, a nd tra nsit oriented; p romoti ng e nergy-efficient building design and site planning; improving the
jobs/housing ratio; and other methods of reducing emissions while maintaining the balance of housing types Folsom is known for.

Goal PFS 2.1 Provide for the educational and literacy needs of Folsom residents.

7. Public Facilities And Services
Goal PFS 3.1 Maintain the City's water system to meet the needs of existing and future development while improving water system efficien
Policy PFS 2.1.2 School Capacity and Development' lf a new development will not contain a school site, the City shall require applicants of new development to show that a
school site has been dedicated, a school site will be
dedicated, or a school already exists with capacity to serve theect
Goal PFS 5.1 Ensure adequate flood control and stormwater drai
Policy PFS 3.1.7 Water Supply. Provide an adequate supply of water for all users in Folsom now and in the future.

FOTSOM ZO35 GENERAL PLAN
lnconsistent. Given the proposal's location at the eastern County and its distance from existing shopping centers, services and jobs in Folsom and El Dorado Hills, it is unlikely that the project will reduce VMT.

Based on previous analyses from SACOG, the further projects are from established areas, the higher the VMT.
edge of Sacramento
lnconsistent. Though the proposal includes a variety of land uses, t and distance from existing public transit make it very likely that residents and employees in the new area will be dependent on private automobile use. As a result, the project is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions. he location
Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below
Consistenconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below.

Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal includes sites for an elementary school and middle school, which would be dedicated to the school district. However, it is unclear whether the high school planned for the Folsom Ranch (aka Folsom Plan Area) would have sufficient capacity to accommodate high school students from this area. Additional analysis would be required. lnrUffietenl"lnfofma$p-n. Developer would need to prepare a drainage study of the site for City review.
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal does not identify a source of water ent. Additional information is the develoired
for
17Page 228
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy PFS 5.1.3 Urban Runoff. Strive to reduce the amount of urban runoff and seek to capture and treat runoff before it enters streams, lakes, and rivers, applicable only to new devement.

Policy PFS 5.1.1 Maintain Adequate Storm Drainage.

Develop and maintain an adequate storm draisystem.

Policy PFS 5.1.4 Green Stormwater lnfrastructure.

Encourage "green infrastructure" design and Low lmpact
Development (LlD) techniques for stormwater facilities (i.e., using vegetation and soil to manage stormwater) to preserve sce and imrunoff wateral and create
Policy PFS 6.1.1 Adequate Facilities. Strive to provide law enforcement facilities, equipment and vehicles, and services to adequately meet the needs of existing and future
development.

Goal PFS 5.1 Maintain a high level of police service as new development occurs to protect residents, visitors, and
pro
Policy PFS 7.1.1Adequate Facilities and Services. Strive to provide fire department facilities, equipment and vehicles, and services to adequately meet the needs of existing and future development.

Goal PFS 7,1 Prevent loss of life, injury, and property due to wildland and structural fires, while ensuring an adequate level of fire protection service is maintained for all.

Goal PFS 9.1: Reduce the amount of waste entering regional an effective waste man landfills throram ment
Policy PFS 7.1.8 New Development. Require that new
development provides all necessary water service, fire
hydrants, and roads consistent with Fire Department
standards.

FOTSOM 2035 GENERAT P]AN
lnsufficient lnformation.
lnsufficient Irmalion.
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal identifies the location for emergency services in the mixed-use village, but there is no information on how this would be provided and funded. The area is currently served by the Sacramento County Sheriff and would need to be brought into the City's police services a rea.
lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below l@Refertothepolicyconsistencyanalysisbelow'
lnconsistent. Project would generate additional waste and recyclables that will increase burden on regional landfill.

Consistent. The applicant understands that any development in this area would be required to meet City Fire Department standards.
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal identifies the location for emergency services in the mixed-use village, but there is no information on how this would be provided or funded. lt is important to note that this area would need to be annexed into the City of Folsom's fire service area as it is currently in Metro F ire'surisdiction.
18Page 229
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Policy PFS 9.1.2 Waste Reduction. Support efforts to re the amount of waste disposed of in landfills through reusing, reducing, and recycling solid waste; and using conversion technoriate. ifaro
duce

8. Parks And Recreation
Policy PFS 9.1.4 Composting. Provide green waste collection and offer compost education to divert organic material from local landfills.

Policy PFS 9.1.3 Recycling Target. Support efforts to
a citywide disposal rate of 1.5 pounds per person per day, exceeding statewide target of 2.7 pounds per person per day 2035
achieve
Goal PR 1.1 Develop and maintain quality parks that support the diverse needs of the community.

Policy PR 1.1.4 Park Acreage Service Level Goal. Strive to develop and maintain a minimum of five acres of
neighborhood and community parks and other recreational facilities/sites per Lulation
Policy PRl.1.1 Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Maintain and continue to implement a Parks and Recreation Master Plan to calicies of this General Plan. out thels and
Policy PR 1.1.5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Consistency Require parks and recreation facilities be consistent with Folsom's Bikeway Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan wheneverossible and connect to the bi
FOTSOM 2035 GENERAI. PTAN
lnsufficient lnformation. Refer to the policy consistency analysis below. lnformation
lnsufficient lnformation. Project would burden existing city services an such should be assessed the cost of new collection vehicles, drivers, an operational costs. Cross-jurisdictional service agreement will also be required crossiCounty line
das
d
due to
lnsufficient lnformation.

Consistent/l nsufficie nt I nformation. Wh i le the pro posa I d iscusses serve the needs of seniors and those with special needs, the proposal lacks rks and amenities that would be provided in eachrk details on theof parks to
Consistent. The 56.6 acres of parkland proposed in the land use plan is generally consistent with the City service level goal of 5 acres per thousand residents based on the persons per household calculations used in the Folsom c PlanFPASB Table 9-3 on9-9 Plan Area
lnconsistent. The project is not identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
lnconsistent. The project is not identified in the Active Transportation Plan 19Page 230
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Goal PR 2.1 Develop, maintain, and implement quality
recreation activities that meet the diverse needs of the community.

Policy PR 1.1.16 Alternative Funding Sources Develop
programs to identify and attain alternative sources of
funding for the acquisition, development, and renovation of parklands and financing of recreation programs.

Policy PR 1.1.15 Repair and Maintenance Maintain all
facilities and equipment to ensure that State and industry safety standards and guidelines are met. The City shall monitor, repair, and replace facilities and equipment as needed.

Policy PR 1.1.14 Parkways. Encourage the development of parkways and greenbelts to connect the citywide parks
system.

Policy PR t.t.12 Neighborhood Parks. Strive to ensure all neighborhoods, new and established, have parks that serve as community focal points.

Policy PR 1.1.7 Universal Access. Require new parks and open spaces be easily accessible to the public, including providing disabled access.

FOTSOM 2035 GENERAT PIAN
Recreation programming is not identified
No information is provided about park plans or development responsibility Responsibility, standards, and funding would need to be identified. lnsufficient lnformation. No information isprovided about park maintenance responsibility. Responsibility, standards for maintenance, and funding would need to be identified.

I nconsistent/l nsufficient I nformation. The la nd useplan includes landscape and trail corridors that connect to the open space area within the area. Though these parkways and corridors connect to open space and trail in the adjacent development in El Dorado County it is not clear how these will connect to those in the Folsom Plan Area and the project is lacking parkways in the north- south direction.

Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. There are multiple parks in the land use plans including 3 neighborhood parks and 5 other larger parks. However, parks do not appear to be equally dispersed throughout the plan area. Additional information is needed on the location, size, and funding sources for the parks.

Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The focus of the proposal is about providing accessible development, parks and open spaces to seniors and persons with disabilities. The proposal mentions that "Park features and playgrounds will be designed to meet the universal needs of an age, physically, a neurologically diverse population." However, more information is needed on how these parks would be paid for, how they would be maintained, and whether all or just a few parks will serve the needs of the population described above.
20Page 231
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Folsom General Plan Excerpts (Adopted August 2018; Amended in 2021) Goal PR 3.1 Encourage community mem
organizations to participate in the planning, development, maintenance of recreation facilihes and and
bers and
rams.

Policy PR 2.1.1 Diversity of Users Provide recreation
programming, special events and venues, and educational opportunities that hono4 interpret, and celebrate the
hicultural heritaand traditions of Folsom. di
Policy PR 4.1.2 School Cooperation Strive to maintain a use arrangement of park and school facilities with the
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
joint
And Noise 9.

Policy PR 4.1.4 Connections Coordinate wit
Regional Transit and the State Department of Parks and
Recreation on establishing trail Iinkages from light rail stations in Folsom to Lake Natoma, Folsom Lake, and the h Sacramento
American River ParkwaY.

Goal SN 4.1 Minimize the adverse impacts resulting from wildfires.

Goal SN 5.1 Protect the citizens of Folsom from the harmful effects of exposure to excessive noise and to protect the economic base of Folsom by preventing the encroachment
of incompatible land uses within areas affected by existing noise-producing uses,
TOTSOM 2035 GENERAL PiAN
lnsufficient lnformation. Project does not identify any communitY engagement for the planning and development of park and recreation facilities lnsuffi cient lnformation. Project ha
"universal needs of an age, PhYsica
s insufficient details to determine if
lly, and neurologically diverse population"
are met here
I nconsistent/l nsufficient I nformation' Project does not ide between the city and the school district in planning of park facilities. ntify any cooperation
Colnformation
lnconsistent. Regional trail connections are not considered in the project Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation' The area proposed for ann within a Moderate Fire Hazard severity Zone according to CAL FIRE (June 2023l'. while the project will be required to meet all city Fire Department standards, few details are mentioned regarding fire protection from wildfires.

More information will be reuired
exation is
Consistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The land use plan includes compati land uses. The two major sources of noise in the area include the Capital southeast connector (white Rock Road) when completed and the railroad tracks where the Placerville-Sacramento Valley Railroad Operates excursion rail on occasional weekends and holidays. Development adjacent to those noise ble
sources may be required to mthe effects of that noise.
1 2Page 232
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Open Space. Measure W required 30 percent of the area to be maintained as natural open space to preserve oak woodlands and sensitive habitat areas. Natural open space shall not include active parks sites, residential yard areas, golf courses, parking lots, and their associated landscaping.

Transportation. An infrastructure funding and phasing plan for the construction of roadways and transportation improvements that are necessary to mitigate traffic impacts caused by any development of the Area. The infrastructure funding and phasing plan shall identify the timing for construction of all transportation improvements, including any required improvements along the Highway 50 corridor, and the timing of the construction of those improvements shall be tied to the anticipated rate of growth and associated traffic impacts. Folsom residents north of Highway 50 shall not be required to pay fees for the construction of any new transportation improvements required to serve the Area.

Water Supply. ldentify and secure the source of water supply(ies) to serve the Area. This new water supply shall not cause a reduction in the water supplies designated to serve existing water users north of Highway 50 and the new water supply shall not be paid for by Folsom residents north of Highway 50.

MEASURE W
Folsom voters overwhelmingly approved Measure W in 2004, approving the city's annexation of the Folsom Plan Area and detailing conditions for development. This new community adheres to Measure W reguirements that stipulated:
lnconsistent. The proposal includes approximately 20 percent open space (283 acres of open space out of a total development area of I,41.6.32 acres).
lnsufficient lnformation. The proposal identifies the use of existing and planned Highway 50 interchanges and the use of the White Rock Road/Capital Southeast Connector as well as the development of new streets, trails, transit, and intersection traffic controls. However, no infrastructure financing plan has been prepared at this point. lnsufficient lnformation. The applicant has not yet identified water source(s) for their project. The area is currently outside of the City of Folsom's water service area boundary and has not been evaluated' Based on the City's 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the City anticipates water use to be approximately 25,52O acre-feet annually at build-out (assumed to occur by year 2045). Total surface water supplies available to the City under existing contracts total 34,000 acre-feet annually. The results in approximately 8,480 acre-feet of unused surface water supplies available to the water users north of Highway 50 under Measure W. Staff is not aware of whether the El Dorado lrrigation District (ElD) or other water purveyors have sufficient supplies to serve the project.

Consistent/lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
22

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

CommunityWest Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004)

MEASUREW
Folsom voters overwhelmingly approved Measure W in 2004, approving the city's annexation of the Folsom Plan Area and deiailing conditions for development. This new community adheres to Measure Wirements that sti
Schools. Submission of a plan to the Folsom Cordova Unified District providing for the funding and construction of all necessary school facilities for the Area, so that Folsom residents north of Highway 50 are not required to pay for the construction of new school facilities serving the Area and existing schools are not overcrowdeddevement in the Area.

School
Development Plan. Adoption of a General Plan Amendment by the City Council to serve as the blueprint for development in the Area.

The General Plan Amendment for this Area shall only be adopted after the completion and certification of an Environmental lmpact Report. The environmental review shall include an evaluation of caland cultural, archaresources.

Consistent/lnconsistentllnsuffident lnformation
lnsufficient lnformation. The plan identifies locations for an school and a middle school, but no additional information is provided There is no plan for a high school. Further coordination with Folsom Cordova Unified School District would be required.
elementary
23Page 234
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Planning Principle 3 - Mix of Compatible Land Uses:

Provide a variety of residential and commercial land uses, public facilities, parks and open spaces
Planning Principle 2 - Enhancing the Natural Environment Preserve and protect the natural habitat within open space areas that also provides opportunities for recreation and enjoyment.

Planning Principle 1- Comprehensively Planned Community Create a wel l-i ntegrated, com pre hensively pla n ned com munity.

FOISOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN {FPASPI - Planning Principles On June 28,z0l,1,,the City Council adopted the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), which included six key planning principles along with goals and objectives for each chapter. This analysis evaluates the proposed project for consistency with the FPASP Planning Principles.

Consistent. As proposed the project includes a variety of land uses all of which are compatible with each other.
lnconsistent. The area proposed for annexation and future development is within the County's South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Area (See attached map of the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Area). This area is meant for habitat conservation. While the proposed land use plan includes approximately 57 acres of parks and 283 acres of open space including trails oriented around Carson Creek and the Placerville-Sacramento Valley Railroad Rail Corridor, it conflicts with the County's habitat conservation plan for the area.

Consistent. The proposed land use plan includes a variety of land uses at different densities and intensities. lt also includes land for a major iob center as well as areas age-restricted restricted housing.

Consistent/lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
24Page 235
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W {Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Planning Principle 4 - Transportation Options:

Provide a public transportation system; a network of "Complete Streets" with bike lanes, sidewalks, and transit stops; and a Comprehensive system of Class I bike paths, sidewalks and pedestrian paths.

I nco nsistent/l nsufficie nt I nfo rmation. There is verylittle information about public transit service for this area. while the Folsom Plan Area specific Plan (FPASP) identifies a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line that would go down Payen Road (refer to FigureT.29 - Transit corridor Plan in the (FPASP) to the project area, recent discussions with Sacramento Regional Transit staff indicate that there is no funding source and no timeline for the BRT line. Furthermore, RT staff have indicated that the low-density development in the southeast part of the Folsom Plan Area would likely make a BRT line uncompetitive for federal funding. The proposal includes Guiding Principle D2.3 about how public transportation should be integrated, convenient and accessible, but there is no information in the plan that shows how that principal will be achieved.

The proposed plan does include class I bike lanes along with pedestrian trails and sidewalks along with Class ll, lll and lV bike lanes' Neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs), autonomous vehicles, and micro-transit are also discussed, but few details are provided regarding locations, funding, and service providers.

The lack of detailed information on transit and the project's location at the edge ofthe county have raised concerns by SACOG and others that the project could result in an increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled (V FOTSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN {FPASP} - PlanningPrintiplesCon sistent/lntonsistent/lnsufficient lnformation On June z8,2ALL,the City Council adopted the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), which included six key planning principles along with goals and objectives for each chapter. This analysis evaluates the proposed project for consistency with the FPASP Planles.
25Page 236
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Planning Principle 5 - Compact Development:

Provide compact walkable neighborhood development form, with vibrant, pedestrian-oriented centers and gathering places that are consistent with Smart Growth principles.
lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation. The proposed land use plan idenfifies Mixed-Use Village south of White Rock Road and east of Payen Road with approximately 24 acres. The density range is 9 to 30 du/ac similar to that of the Folsom Plan Area's Town Center. However, unlike the Town Center, the proposed Mixed-Use Village is located at the northeastern edge of the project far from the major employment center unlike the FPA Town CenteL which is in the center of the project area and close to the major employment centers.

With regard to the proposed project's compatibility with Smart Growth principles, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lists L0 key principles of smart growth. These include:

L. Mix of land uses

2. Take advantage of compact design

3. Create a range of housing opportunities and choices

4. Create walkable communities

5. Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of G. f [::r"" open space, farmland, natural beautv, and critical environmental areas
7 . Direct development toward existing communities

8. Provide a variety of transportation choices

9. Make development decisions predictable, fair and cost-effective

10. Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions
The proposed land use plan addresses many of these principles; howevel since it directs growth into previously undeveloped areas south of White Rock Road, the project is not consistent with smart growth principle #7. The area is also within the County's South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan boundary, which means the project may be in conflict with principle #6. lt is also outside of Sacramento Regional Transit's service area for public transit, which may mise the#8 ect's ability to meetncl co
26Page 237
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Planning Principle 6 - Sustainable Design:

Make use of sustainable design practices intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce water consumption, and energy use, and preserve valuable natural resources'
FOLSOM PIAN AREA SPECIfICPLAN (FPASP| - Planning Principles On June 28,zBLL,the City Council adopted the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), which included six key planning principles along with goals and objectives for each chapter. This analysis evaluates the proposed project for consistency with the FPASP Planns,
I nco nsistent/l nsufficie nt I nfo rmation. wh i le there is i nsufficient information to do a comprehensive evaluation of this principle, the relatively low densities of the project coupled with its remote location at the edge of Sacramento County as well as the amount of single- family development proposed, it is unlikely that the project would be able to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or water consumption compared to a higher density project closer to existing transit and services.

Consistent/lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
27Page 238
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

CommunityWest Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) FOTSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN{FPASP} - Ch. 7: €irculation Objective 7.1: Consistent with the California Comp
of 2008 and the Sustainable Communities and
Climate Protection Act (SB 375), create a safe and efficient leted Streets Act
circulationfor all modes of travel
Objective 7.3: Encourage non-vehicular travel options
sidewalks, trails and bikeway connectivity between neighborhoods and destination Points.
by providing
Objective 7.2: Provide parallel vehicular capacity to Highway 50 Objective 7.4: Consistent with the California G
Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) and the FPASP Operation Air Quality Plan, improve Plan Area air quality by reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through innovative site design and the inclusion of a lobalWarming
onal transit corridor
in a grid-like pattern of streets and blocks, except where topography and natural features make it infeasible, for the majority of the Plan Area in order to create neighborhoods that encourage walking, ublic transit and other alternative modes of tran
Policy 7.1: The roadway network in the Plan Area shall be organize bikirtation
d
Policy 7.2: Circulation within the Plan Area shall be ADA accessi and minimize barriers to access by pedestrians, the disabled, seniors and bicyclists. Physical barriers such as walls, berms, and landscaping that separate residential and nonresidential uses and impede bicycle or pedestrian access or circulation shall be minimized,
ble
Policy 7.3: The Plan Area shall apply for permanent membership in the 50 Corridor TMA. Funding to be provided by a Community Facilities District or other non-revocable funding mechanism. crRcutATloNOBJECTIVES AND POTICIES
Consistent/l nconsiste nt/lnsufficie ntlnformation
Not applicable to this project, although the project wi capital southeast Connector, which is the parallel capacity for Highway 50, and as such will likely need to pay a fair share contribution towards that facil
ll impact the
lnsufficient information: need to see typica
consistency. The Village Parkway 2 cross section shown on page 45 of the Project Narrative is consistent with the Complete Streets Act but the remaininstreet typesneed to be assessed as well.

I street sections to assess
lnsufficient information. The Village Parkway 2 and Class I Rai cross sections shown in the project narrative feature sidewalks and trails, but the remaining street types also need to be assessed for Consistent; the project appears to feature a mix of
residential land uses designed to minimize long-distance vehicular travel, and is geared towards an older residential population, which tends to have lower vehicle utilization overall.
residential and non-
lroad Trail
consiste
mixed-use areas of the development. Guiding Principle D2.4 on Page 24 of the Project Narrative states that the roadway network should utilize a grid-like pattern.
consistent. The project narrative depicts grid-like street patterns in the Consistent. Guiding Principle D4.2 on Page 25 of the Project Narrative states that the project will be designed to promote accessibility' Guiding Principle D2.3 on page 24 of the Project Narrative also states that public transportation should be accessible.
lnsufficient information
28Page 239
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

CommunityWest Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) FOTSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN tFPASPI - Ch. 7: Circulation Policy 7.4: Submit a General Plan Ame
General Plan Policy !7.I7 regarding Traffic Level of service 'c'. This level of service may not be achieved throughout the entire Plan ndment to the city to modify
Area at buildout.

Objective 7.6: Limit street widths to the minimum requi FMC and avoid backing homes on to low traffic volume collector streets.
red by the
Obiective 7.5: Provide multiple and direct street routing traditional rectilinear both macro- and micro-level grid patterns of street in the town center, mixed use neighborhood centers, multi- family residential neighborhoods and single-family high density residential neborhoods
based on a
Policy 7.5: A framework of arterial and collector roadways s developed that accommodate Plan Area traffic while
thareas. -traffic demands to be aining ci
hall be
accom
Objective 7.7: Minimize the need for soundwalls by
and collector streets adjacent to open space, public facilities, and commercial uses where feasible
locating arterial
Policy 7.5: Major and minor arterials, collectors, and minor collectors shall be provided with sidewalks that safely separate pedestrians from vehicular traffic and class ll bicycle lanes that encoutchoices within the Plan Area
Policy 7.72 Traffic calming measures shall be utilized, where appropriate, to minimize neighborhood cut-through traffic and excessive speeds in residential neighborhoods' Roundabouts and traffic circles shall be considered on low volume neighborhood streets as an alternative to four-way stops or where traffic signals will be required at project build-out. Traffic calming features included in the City of Folsom's Neighborhood Traffic Management m GuidelinesNTMP Palso be utilized in the Plan Area
Consistent/l nconsistent/lnsuffi cient lnformation
ROADWAYcLASStFICATIONOBJECTIVESANDPOuclES
Not applicable
lnsuffi cient information.

Consistent, The project narrative depicts
mixed-use areas of the development. Guiding Principle D2.4 on Page 24 of the Project Narrative states that the roadway network should utilize a grid-like pattern.
grid-like street Patterns in the
Consistent
I nsuffici ent information/l nconsistent. Pre li mi na ry site residential areas adjacent to arterial and collector streets but lacks sufficient detail to determine if soundwalls will be necessa plan shows
lnsufficient information: need to see typical street sections to assess consistency. The Village Parkway 2 cross section shown on page 45 of the Project Narrative depicts sidewalks but the remaining streets types need to be assessed as well.
lnsufficient information. The Project Narrative does not id intersections that are anticipated to have traffic controls, and does not mention if traffic controls will be consistent with City roundabout policies.
entify
29Page 240
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Objective 7.9: Plan transit-oriented development (TOD) projects that generate high potential transit use including a mix of commercial, mixed-use, office, and residential developments along thenal transit corridor
Objective 7.8: Promote the use of public transit in the Plan Area by providing a safe, secure, and cost-effective transit system that provides frequent and convenient transit service to local and regional destinations.

PUBTIC TRANSIT OBJECTIVES AND POI"ICIES
I
Policy 7.8A: Concurrent with development of the SP-RC and SP.CC parcels located at the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway, the following roadway improvements will be constructed:

Alder Creek Pkwy from Prairie City Rd to East Bidwell St.

E. Bidwell Street from White Rock Road to U.S. Highway 50.

Rowberry Dr (including the overcrossing of U.S. Highway 50) The timing, extent of improvements and interim improvements shall be predicated on the extent and type of development proposed for the above referenced
Policy 7.8: Roadway improvements shall be constructed to coincide with the demands of new development, as required to satisfy city minimum level of service standards.

FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN {FPASP} - Ch. 7: Circulation lnconsistent/lnsufficient information. Project does not appear to be planned as a TOD.

Consistent. The Project Narrative describes incorporation of, or access to transit opportunities such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and community micro-transit. Guiding Principle D2.3 on page24 of the Project Narrative states that public transportation should be integrated, convenient and accessible.

Not applicable
lnsufficient information. A detailed traffic analysis is necessary to determine potential traffic impacts and level of service issues' Consistent/lnconsistent/lnsuffi cient lnformation
30Page 241
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

CommunitYWest Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN{FPASPI - Ch. 7: Circulation Policy 7.9: Public transportation opportunities to,
the plan Area shall be coordinated with the city of Folsom Public works Transit Division and the sacramento Regional Transit District (RT). Regional and local fixed and circulator bus routes through the Plan Area shall be an integral part of the overall circulation network to guarantee public transportation service to major destinations for employment, shopping, public institutions, multi-family housing and other land uses Ito attractlic transit use
from, and within
Policy 7.10: Consistent with the most recent update of the RT master plan and the Plan Area Master Transit Plan, a transit corridor shall be provided through the Plan Area for future regional 'Hi-Bus' service (refer to Figure7.29 and the FPASP Transit Master Plan)' Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated for the transit corridor as described in Section 7.3 and Fires 77 .3, 7 .1,4 & 7. 1-5 . policy 7.12: Provide interim park-and-ride facilities for public transit use as shown in the FPASP Transit Master Plan
Policy 7.11: Future transit bus stops and associated amenities sha be placed at key locations in the Plan Area according to the recommendation of the FPASP Transit Master Plan.

Policy 7.14: The City of Folsom shall participate with the Sacramento Area Council of Government in a revision of the City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update Final Report, dated Seber 2005. The ushall include the Plan Area
Policy 7.13: The City of Folsom shall participate with the El Dorado County Transportation Commission in an update of the "Folsom El Dorado Corridor Transit Strategy Final Report dated December 2005, The update shall include the Plan Area and Sacramento Cou
Policy 7.15: The Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) "A Guide to Transit Oriented Development (TOD)" shall be used as a design guideline for subsequent project level approvals for all projects the Plan Area transit corridor
Consistent/l nconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
lnsufficient information, The Project Narrative does not whether or not the applicant intends to coordinate with sacramento RegionalTransit (City of Folsom no longer is a transit agency)' specify
Not applicable. Project is not subject to the FPASP Transit Master P but likely will require its own transit master plan.
lan
Not applicable. Project is not subject to the FPASP Transit Master but likely will require its own transit master plan
Plan
lnsufficient information. Project Narrative does not spec not applicant will coordinate with the jurisdictions but given that the project is proposed in both jurisdictions it will likely be required. ify whether or
Not applicable. Project is not subject to the FPASP Transit Master Plan ire its own transit master Plan but likewill requ
lnsufficient information
lnsuffi cient information
1 3Page 242
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Policy 7.21: All Plan Area land uses shall be located within approximately 1/2 mile of a Class I bike path or a Class ll bike lane.

Policy 7.20: Per state and federal programs, safe routes to schools shall be identified and signed
Policy 7.19: Class I bike path and trail crossings of Alder Creek and intermittent drainages channels shall be minimized and located and designed to cause the least amount of disturbance to the creek environment.

Policy 7.18: Traffic calming measures and signage shall be used to enhance the safety of sidewalk, trail, and bikeway crossings of arterial and collector streets.

Policy 7.17: Public accessibility to open space and scenic areas within the Plan Area shall be provided via roadway, sidewalks, trail, and bikeway connections, where appropriate.

Policy 7.15: A system of sidewalks, trails, and bikeways shall internally link all land uses and connect to all existing or planned external street and trail facilities contiguous with the Plan Area to provide safe routes of travel for pedestrians and bicyclists as depicted in Figure 7.32 and as indicated on the applicable roadway sections. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be designed in accordance with city design standards, including the latest version of the Bikeway Master Plan, the FPASP and the FPASP Community Design Guidelines.

Objective 7.10: Provide a continuous interconnected network of sidewalks, trails and bikeways throughout the Plan Area ranging from internal neighborhood connections to regional trail networks.

SIDEWAIKS, TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS OBJECNVES AND POLICIES
FOISOM PIAN AREA SPEGIFIC PLAN (FPASPI * Ch. 7: Circulation lnsufficient information.

Consistent. The Project Narrative includes several guiding principles related to safe and accessible pedestrian facilities, including Guiding Principle D5.6, which specifies that neighborhoods shall be designed to offer safe routes to school.

Not applicable
lnsuffi cient information.
lnsufficient information. The Project Narrative depicts several trails and contains guiding principles that describe a safe and interconnected trail and sidewalks system but lacks sufficient detail to determine consistency.
lnsufficient information. The Project Narrative depicts several trails and contains guiding principles that describe a safe and interconnected trail and sidewalks system but lacks sufficient detail to determine consistency.
lnsufficient information. The Project Narrative depicts several trails and contains guiding principles that describe a safe and interconnected trail and sidewalk system but lacks sufficient detail to determine consistency.

Consistent/l nconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
32Page 243
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Community West Review for Compliance with Measure W (Voter Ballot Measure Passed in 2004) Policy 7.23: Adequate short- and long-term bicycle parking shall be provided for all Plan Area land uses (except for single-family and single-family high density residentral uses) as specified in Table A.14.

Pdicy 7.22; Site design and building placement shall minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity' Physical barriers such as walls, berms, landscaping, and slopes between residential and non-residential land uses that unnecessarily impede bicycle or pedestrian circulation shallbe minimized. Clearly marked shaded paths shall be provided through commercial and mixed-use parking lots.

FOTSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PIAN {FPASP} - Ch. 7: Circulation I nsufficie nt i nformation.

I nsufficient i nformation. Project N a rrative contai ns n umerous guidi ng principles related to user-friendly, safe and accessible pedestrian facilities but lacks sufficient detail to determine consistency with this policy.

Consistent/lnconsistentlnsufficient lnfornration
33

04/23/2024 Item No.11.
coMMUNTTY WEST REVTEW FOR COMPLTANCE WITH ADOPTED STRATEGTC PLAN (2023) Strategy 7. Develop additional revenue sources for consideration to provide sufficient revenues to deliver services to the
community.

GoalB: Publicand lnfrastructure
Strategy 2. Develop a plan to meet future fire department needs including review of need for additional stations, apparatus, and administrative and training facilities.

The proposal claims this project would provide a net fiscal benefit to the city. This would need to be examined. I have concerns about the city's ability to provide services to serve the proposed project without adverse impact to existing or approved development.

A tax sharing agreement with the County will need to be developed - the results of this agreement will have an impact on the proposal's claim that thisect wouldrovide a net fiscal benefit
lnconsistent. The project area lacks Fire/EMS services within its boundaries. Establishing such services would necessitate fulfilling several fundamental requirements:

A centrally located fire station within the proposed
community.

Essential apparatus including Type 1 and Type 3 fire engines, along with an ambulance.

Staffing comprising 15 personnel trained in fire and
ememedicalnse.
a
a
a
Strategy 6. Develop new funding sources and strategies to build new facilities or expand and enhance existing facilities to meet the demands of a growing population.

GoalA: Financialand
Values
lntegrity: Demonstrating honesty and strong ethical principles in all actions and decisions.

Professionalism: Delivering high-quality services based on the skills and competence of trained employees, and best industry practices.

Financial stability: Planning for the long term and making decisions in the short term to ensure the necessary resources are available to deliver City services and achieve goals established by the Council.

Mission: The City of Folsom provides a safe, healthy, and vibrant community through innovative, responsive, and effective delivery of public services to maintain and enhance the quality of life of our residents.

Visionl The City of Folsom serves as a role model and regional leader that blends its rich historical roots and diverse cultural, recreational, and business resources into a great community.

FOLSOM STRATECIC PIAN FY23.2 4 - F.127 -28
Will their proposed facilities be city facilities or private? lf they are city facilities, we will need a nexus study and develop a fee program lf city, we will need a funding source for maintaining the facilities.

Consistent/lnconsistent/lnsufficient lnformation
34Page 245
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

COMMUNITY WEST REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ADOPTED STRATEGIC PLAN (2023) Strategy 4. ldentify funding to increase police department staffing to meet community needs.

Goal C: Economic and
Strategy 4. Evaluate market opportunities in Folsom to create opportunities to leverage existing high tech, healthcare, and otherificant local industries
lnconsistent. No plan for police services or facilities has been provided and the area is currently outside Folsom PD service boundaries.

Strategy 3. ldentify a funding plan to expand police department facilities to meet department needs.
lnconsistent. No plan for police services or facilities has been provided and the area is currently outside Folsom PD service boundaries.

These prerequisites primarily raise concerns regarding budget allocation and the sources for covering additional expenditures' Another vital aspect to address is the possible absence of adequate radio coverage, which currently may be outside the scope of the Sacra mento Regional Fire/EMS Comm unication Center, Addressin g this issue may require the installation of a radio tower/antenna or a communications repeater
35Page 246
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

HlGi!VAY 58
A.LOtR CRFEK PKlU\'
citu ci'Fciscrn'.. "v 50
HlGh\!r
'
tegend
-
fU noisom clw Bourncianv
Pnannlng ,Area Boundary
Froposed Annexation
l-andowners Bonndanles
EN Donado eount\r
cE
€
-
i
SAVANNAIJ 4.

Rar,-.C:. Z-
3€
2 a
Arcadian
Heights
LLC/MJ 3XE
Jr and EettYt
on-E
o9-;,Ti,SOTf'
i\riANGlNl PK'{vY
.t
'#.
a
I
I
I
I
I
e
F
H
rJ
cn
F
C\l
6l
a)
F
q)
bo
Wl'lite Rock Road
Properties [-LC
CJ
0 C
u
E
ffi!*
ffi
U)
State of
California
T
I
', Afe.ad'talt,
Sou,th,&liO,
It
t
1 'l
'I
f
0 Wilson Ranch
1400 r-LC
Katherine Tsakopoul,os
2Otr2 lrrevoeable
Famiiy/Etal
I
D$
r---r.-rT--T:--------r M i les
:.. i : r... 1; i.i -'i :
.JO
Date.1119124

04/23/2024 Item No.11.
s0urr
stErftttr0

HTTITTT
G0tStnulTl0t
Flril
{
it,
SSHCP PtAN AREA
I!!1 URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA
EPRoPoSED ANNEXATToN AREA
:l
':i:,

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

ATTACHMENT 4
Public Comments

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

IT
ECOS
ENVIRONPlENTAL
. COUNCIL}

OF SACRAMENTO
7 P.,,J. Box 1526, S:icracrt:nto, CA 95812- 1526
'\, i 6i 444'A*2'2
:rfti r oi?T) :'crr ;.1 il.-1i:' eat I J rlet
lvww. e{O5.1.e r?i'11 a ll Io. i] ei
INTO
March 29,2024
Mike Kozlowski, Mayor
mkozlowski @, fo 1s om. c a. us
Sarah Aquino, Vice-Mayor
Vice Mayor
[email protected]
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
[email protected]
Rosario Rodriguez, Councilmember
ca.us
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
[email protected]
Dear City Council representatives,
Habitat 2020, a coalition of Sacramento area environmental organizations, under the umbrella of the Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS), understand that your Council has received a request from AKT development to initiate hearings before Sacramento LAFCO to approve sphere of influence designation for a substantial area of land south of tn" city's current city limits (and extending well into El Dorado County), and that this request would likely be followed by an effort on the part of the City to proceed with the annexation of the portion of land currently within the boundaries of Sacramento County. We also understand that City staff are preparing a report for your consideration as to whether or not to proceed with the request.

As you well know, initiation of this process has significant implications for City residents as well as county, regional and state policies and programs. Of particular interest is how a supply of water to accommodate the proposed development might be rnade available. Place of use restrictions on Folsom's water rights will limit the u.t uituUitity of surface water use in the proposed development area. Folsom previously used conservation savings tolusti$' water availability development south of Highway 50, an option not available for the AKT project. Availability of water from El Dorado Irrigation District and the impacts of delivering any water to within Sacramento County are unknown. The City has previously experienced water delivery reductions during recent drought years. Climate assessments demonstrate that the region will face dryer atmospheric conditions and more frequent and severe droughts in the coming years. As a Water Forum member, the City has committed to help protect the Lower American River, including further restrictions on the availability of water under specified conditions.

We also have concems regarding the project's traffic impacts and increases in emissions resulting from the project's buildout. Under Califomia state law the Sacramento Region must meet mandated targets for www.ecosacramento.netPage 250
04/23/2024 Item No.11.
greenhouse gas reduction and air quality by 2030. The approval of a very large greenfield most certainly does not advance the long-term ability to meet these targets.

Given the very significant challenges associated with this proposed development' we strongly urge you to consider this matter in unhurried fashion with full and open forums for public input and discussion prior to your recommendation, and with time for subsequent analysis and response to issues raised. The issues are too important to leave to the end of the LAFCO hearing process, when the analysis of environmental impacts "nA
of public service availability will be released just a few weeks before a final decision' We would further strongly encourage your consideration of conducting this public discussion in joint meetings with the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors.

Sincerely,
hru,*-- Li*"''"*
Susan Herre, Board President, ECOS
,ri. / .
&,h
ti,-f
-. ' -/'.

Robert Butness, Cochair, Habrlat 2020
Barbara Leary,Executive Committee Chair, Sacramento Group Sierra Club David Zelinsky, Executive Committee Chair, Madrone Group Sierra Club Sean Wirth, Conservation Chair, Mother Lode Chapter Sierra Club c : Elaine Anderson, City Manager, eandersen@fol som. ca.us Pam Johns, Communify Development Director, piohns @.fol ca-us Desmond Parrington, P lanning Director, dparrin gton@ fo lsom. c a' us Marcus Yatsutakl, Environmental and Water Resources Director, myatsutake@,folsom.ca.us www.ecosacramento.netPage 251
04/23/2024 Item No.11.
intel,
March 2o'h,2024
Mayor Mike Kozlowski and Members of the Folsom City Council, c/o Pam Johns, Community Development Director
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
RE: "Community for Health and lndependence" proposal
Dear Mayor Mike Kozlowski and Members of the City Council, lntel Corporation has been a long-term member of the Folsom community since opening the campus on prairie city Road in 1984, and currently employs more than 5000 people in Folsom. we are committed to helping our community be a great place to live, and to developing and applying technology to make lives better.

We are pleased to indicate our support for further study of the "Community for Health and lndependence", as proposed by AKT, and for the proposed collaboration with UC Davis Health' From lntel's perspective, this projectwill provide a valuable housing resource to lntel employees, dependents, and retirees, and will provide an exceptionally valuable opportunity for research in the use of technology to improve the lives of individuals with special needs.

This project presents a very exciting opportunity for our community and our region. Further, with so many headlines about our senior population growing, the time for an idea like this is now' We encourage the city to initiate studies on this proposal' Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
,C , ,' ,o
,(.--"'iEa
Sandra Colner
GM/Director of Health & Life Sciences Center of Excellence lntel Corporation

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

April 5,2024
Folsom City Council
c/o Pom Johns, Community Development Director
50 Notomo Street
Folsom, CA 95630
RE: "Community for Heolth ond lndependence" proposol
Deor Moyor Mike Kozlowski ond Members of the City council:

Blue Shield of Colifornio is o non-profit heolth plon, with neorly 3,ooo employees in Roncho Cordovo ond El Dorodo Hills ond the surrounding Socromento region. Our mission is to creote o heolth core system worthy of our fomily ond friends ond sustoinobly offordoble. Reolizing this mission monifests in our willingness to toke on the stotus quo, to odvonce tronsformotive public policy ond invest in technology lt is with this perspective thot we ore pleosed to indicote our support for further study of the "Community for Heolth ond lndependence" proposed by ATK, ond colloborotion with UC Dovis Heolth' Ordinorily, Blue Shield of Colifornio does not typicolly weigh in on locol lond use decisions, but the Community for Heolth ond lndependence proposol envisions o public heolth benefit thot belies the typicol development proposol. The concept of o community thot oddresses the needs of individuols with intellectuol disobilities, ond the needs of seniors, in o diverse community setting is o novel concept ond oppropriote to oddress the oging of our communities.

The exciting ospect of the proposol is the creotion of o UC Dovis Heolth reseorch center' For o heolth plon dedicoted to tronsforming our heolth core system, we believe this proposol offers o unique opportunity to perform long term, systemic reseorch into methods of serving those with speciol needs ond hos the potentiol to moke our oreo o notionol center of excellence ond one thot benefits our members, our community ond beyond' We believe the proposed project offers importont benefits to the locol community, to Colifornio, ond to seniors ond individuols with speciol needs. We encouroge the city to initiote studies on this proposol.
blue
co lifo rn iow

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Thonk you for your considerotion
Sincerely,
Andrew Kiefer
Vice President, Stote Government Affoirs

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Fill qfll,lCITV LILERI{'S DEFT
'rf nPn;24 Ps$:06
$fr
Sein!
Voeational
Sor.vr++s
412124
Council Members - Folsom City Council
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN: Christa Freemantle - city clerk ([email protected]) Dear Council Members,
On behalf of Social Vocational Services (SVS), I am writing in support of initiating studies for the proposed.Community for Health and lndependence" as presented byAKT in collaboration with UC Davis (scheduled for hearing on April 23).

Social Vocational Services has been providing services to adults with intellectual and Jeuetopmental disabilities since its inception in 1977. Today SVS offers a wide range of quality, individualized programs for adults with lntellectual/Developmental Disabilities. These services include Adult Day-Services, Career Exploration, Supported Employment, Supported I lndependent Livhg and Residential Services. We look fonivard to providing services in the city of Folsom and its sunounding communities.

As a service provider with more than 80 locations across the state of California, we can tell you first-hand tnai there is a tremendous need for the kinds of housing, community, employment, and health care approaches that are envisioned by the AKT project, especially as people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their family's age.

We would welcome the opportunity to participate with you as you explore this proposal, and provide our expertise on ho* the iommunity, if ultimately approved, could best serve the population we serve.

We hope you will move forward with studying the proposal and we welcome the opportunity to work with you.

Thank you for your attention.

Best Regards,
elu^rl.?owso*
Edward T Dawson, Ph D
Executive Director
Social Vocational Service, lnc,
Social Vocationat Services - 3555 Torrance Blvd. - Torrance. CA 90503 Tel: (31 0) 944-3303 - Fax (31 0) 344-3304

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

M ERISTEM
AprilS,2024
Folsom City Council
c/o Pam Johns, Community Development Director
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95530
RE: "CommsniW for !'lealth and lndependence'Proposal
Dear Folsorn City Council,
I am writing to express Meristern's enthusiastic support for the "Community for Health & lndependence {CHl)" proposal offered by AKT and UC Davis Health and encourage the City of Folsom to proceed with the relevant studies to evaluate the Proposed project.

As a program dedicated lo preparing neurodiverse young adults for greater independence and fulfillment, we recognize the value of creating inclusive and intentional living communities that caterto the diverse needs of both our students and the aging population in the region.

I in 35 young people are now diagnosed with autisrn, and an estimated 70,000 graduate from high school each year. Now more than ever, it is critical that we have communities that can offer su pported, afforda ble I iving for this growing popu lation.

Located near Sacramento, on a 13-acre carnpus in Fair Oaks, Meristem serves young adults between the ages of 18-2S who demonstrate the potential for increased independence and self-sufficiency. Our str.ldents often have aspirations for careers and/or college and are commltted to discovering and working towards their passions and goals" We belleve that the proposed program aligns perfectly with hope that participants in our progrern would be able to find meaningfulwork, independent housing. and community oncethey leave our prograrn.

Pro.iects like this can brldge the gap between our students'aspirations and the available support services, ultimately leading to mcre futfilling and independent iives for our graduates. We believe that the CHI project is an interesting concept that merits the utmost consideration and that your staffwill begin a prompt evaluation of this forward-thinking proiect.

We are enthusiastic about the potential impact of this program on the lives of neurodiverse young adults in our community and beyond. Thanks in advance for your consideration' Sincerely,
Eric Schirm
Executive Director
Meristem
CC; Christa Freernantle, City Clerk
9:llo irt Oars &uifiird
ia'/ Aka arlilortr 1)38:8
)15 %3'r_EA

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

I
Gnrarrn SecnAMENTo
ECONOMiC COUNCIL
April3,2024
Members of the Folsom City Council
c/o Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Dear members of the Folsom City Council:

RE: "Community for Health and lndependence" proposal - Scheduled for April 23,2024 Meeting Agenda The Greater Sacramento Economic Partnership (GSEC) was established in 2015 to catalyze growth, prosperity, sustainability and equity by shifting the region one cohesive regional economic development strategy.

With this focus in mind, we are pleased to inform you of our support for further study of the "Community for Health and lndependence" proposed by AKT lnvestments, lnc, in collaboration with UC Davis Health.

This proposed community, which is envisioned to become a world-class center for the study of healthy aging in a digital world, is poised to be a magnet for local investment in healthcare, technology, construction and jobs.

As you know, our region's 6O and older population, is projected to increase by 78% by 2030.1That said, El Dorado and Placer counties are projected to experience higher rates of growth among this age group (IOg% and IO4%, respectively)2, and by 2060, Sacramento County's "Over 60" population is expected to increase L86%from 2010 levels, while El Dorado County's same population will increase by B8%'3 These facts present both a challenge and an opportunity. A challenge in that we cannot afford to overlook the needs of this population and an exciting opportunity to cement our region on the world stage by attracting the research, technology and skilled jobs to meet them.

We look forward to participating in any further discussions on this proposal and encourage the Council to begin studies on this proposal.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sjncerely, /l
lWlhm"a
Barry Brobme
President & CEO
l california Department of Aging, "california state Plan on Aeine 2017-2021." (2018) 2 California Department of Aging, "California State Plan on Aeine 2017-2021," (2018) 3 CA Dept. of Aging, "Facts About California's Elderlv"

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

E,S L @
April 1,6,2024
Mayor Mike Kozlowski and Members of the Folsom City Council, c/o Pam Johns, Community Development Director
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
RE: "Community for Health and lndependence" proposal
Dear Members of the Folsom City Council,
Eskaton, the largest regional nonprofit aging services provider, has been dedicated to enhancing the lives of older adults throughout Northern California for over 50 years. Eskaton seeks to better serve our community by offering diverse choices and integrating technological advancements into daily living. With a national reputation for innovation, Eskaton remains focused on creating a culture of purposeful living and being a catalyst for change.

With this focus in mind, we support and request you move ahead with further study of the ,,Communityfor Health and lndependence" proposed byAKT, in collaboration with UC Davis Health' From Eskaton's perspective this project fulfills several criticalgaps in our region offering extraordinary opportunities for Folsom and El Dorado County, specifically:
1,. The region's aging population is rapidly growing and new opportunities to live healthier, integrated and supported lives is imperative with well-designed age-friendly communities that incorPorate
'/ Staying active, connected and engaged
'/ Neighborhoods and housing with access to services
'/ Transportation and mobilitY
'/ Access to healthy activities, education and support'

2. Children and adults living with special needs, along with their parent caregivers are seeking opportunities to live, learn, work and serve in integrated communities'

3. With the proposed "hub" of research, education and technologicaladvances, this project could position Folsom and El Dorado County as a national innovative model exemplifying health and indePendence.

We ask that you support further studies of the proposed "Community for Health and lndependence", representing an exciting opportunity to bring forth a multi-generational community model with a hub of healthy living excellence.

Thank you for your consideration
Sincerely,
N"*
Sheri Peifer, President & Chief Executive Officer

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

IO:

Cc:

Subject:
ki m berlyannebuss@ g mail.com
Friday, April 12, 2024 4:50 PM
Pam Johns
City Clerk Dept
Community for Health and lndependence
,l so.u people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]' Learn whv this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments u nless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Fotsom City Councit
c/o Pam Johns, Community Devetopment Director
50 Natoma Street
Fotsom, CA 95630
Dear Ms. Johns and the Fol.som City Council,,
I am the mother of E1i Franket, a young aduLt with an intel.l,ectuat and deveLopmentatdisabitity. I am asking you to ptease study the proposed Community for Heatth and lndependence that witt be presented to your meeting on APril.23rd.

My famity and I are l,ong-standing members of the greater Sacramento Vatl.ey Community and ptan to stay here. I have been a famil,y physician with Sutter Heatth for my entire career. My 25-year-otd son ELi is sweet, funny, and Loving. As he enters aduLthood, he needs a safe community in our greater region that is designed to support his independence and wel.Lbeing. lf he is abLe find a ptace to tive, work, sociatize and grow - close to our fami1y so that we are abLe to be there to support him - he wil.t thrive and continue to be a wonderfut bl,essing to our whote community.

This potentiat new devetopment is a fabuLous opportunity for our region' We urge you to study the proposal, for the community for Heatth and lndependence and to do so on behatf of peopLe I'ike my son Eri.

Thank you for your consideration
Kim
Kimberly Eluss, MD, llilPl'l
916-397-2759 | Mobile
[email protected]
Physician Research Collaborator
Center for Health System Research, Sutter l-lealth
Kimberly. Buss3@sutterhealth. org
1 Page 259
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:
david hanson < hansonl [email protected]>
Thursday, April 1 1,2024 2:15 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk DepU [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l'[email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is im portant at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAboutSende rldentification l CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
David Hanson
119 Hopfield Drive,
Folsom
1

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Rosie Gonzales- Reiff < rgonzalesreiff@yahoo'com >
Thursday, April 1 1,2024 1:53 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla;Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcaov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; bosfive@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAbo utSenderldentification l
CAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
lamafamilymember and/orcaregiverof apersonwithdevelopmentaldisabilities. lamwritingtoyoutodaytoaskthat you please move forward with studies on the proposed Communityfor Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region' we urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration.

Rosie Gonzales-Reiff
9L6-738-9104
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 261
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Rich Zehring < [email protected]>
Thursday, April 1 1, 2024 12:33 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; [email protected]; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l.garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAbo utse nderldentificatio n l
cAUTloN: This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
lamtheparent of a24yearolddaughterwithdevelopmentaldisabilities.Weworryallthetimeaboutwhereour daughter will live should something happen to us and as we age. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for
Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23. lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 262
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:
lo:

Deborah Goldsmith <[email protected]>
Thursday, April 1 1, 2024 'lO:19 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ki [email protected]; edc.cob@edcgov'us; karen.l.garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/LearnAbo utSe nderldentification l
GAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
lamafamilymember and/orcaregiverof apersonwithdevelopmentaldisabilities. lamwritingtoyoutodaytoaskthat you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmentaldisabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities willonly be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residentialcommunities in the greater sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Gratefully,
Deb Goldsmith
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 263
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Janet Wininger <[email protected] >
Wednesday, APril 10, 20241'.19 PM
Mike Kozlowski; sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; bosfour@edcgov'us; bosfive@edcgov'us; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen'l'ga rner@edcgov'us please move forward with studies for the proposed community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn whv this is imoortan! CAUTIOI'I: This email originated from outside of the organization' Do not click lin ks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe'
I am the parent/caregiver/conservator of a person with devetopmentat disabil'ities and severe autism who is 30 years otd. I am writing to you today to ask that you pLease move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Heatth and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for ApriL 23' lndividuats with devel.opmental. disabil,ities deserve opportunities to live, work, sociatize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital' resources such as heatth care, and an improved quatity of Life. These opportunities will. onty be accessibl'e to a few, as there are no safe, affordabLe residentiaI communities in the greater sacramento area which are specificatty created for adutts with devel'opmentaI d isabil'ities'
It is a criticaI need, as most deve[opmentaLl.y disabted aduLts Live at home with aging caregivers due to the Lack of affordab1e housing options, Leaving them highty vulnerabl,e in their Later years of Life' we are presentty searching for a new Living situation for our bel.oved son since we are nearty 70 and have no ctose famil,y l,iving in the area. This has been a daunting task since options for peopl'e I'ike our son are severety Limited.

The Community for Heatth and lndependence, as envisioned, coul.d meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge you to study and exptore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and Long-overtooked PoPu Lation.

Thank you for you r consideration!
Janet Wininger
1 Get Outtookfor iOS

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Sally Dermenjian < sdermenjian@gmail'com >
Tuesday, April 9, 2024 9:14 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcaov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l.garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
, Sor" people who received this message don't often get emailfrom sdermenjian@gmail'com. Learn whv this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe
I am a famity member and/or caregiver of a person with deveLopmentat disabitities. I am writing to you today to ask that you ptease move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Heatth and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for ApriL 23. lndividuats with devetopmentaI disabitities deserve opportunities to live, work, sociatize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vitaL resources such as heaLth care, and an improved quaLity of Life. These opportunities wil.L onty be accessibte to a few, as there are no safe, affordab1e residential, communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifical'l'y created for adutts with deveLopmentatdisabitities. lt is a criticat need, as most deveLopmentatty disabl'ed aduLts 1ive at home with aging caregivers due to the tack of affordabte housing options, l,eaving them highty vul,nerabte in their later years of life,
The Community for Heatth and lndependence, as envisioned, coutd meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and exptore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and tong-over[ooked poputation.

Thank you for your consideration
Sal,l.y Teet Dermenjia n
1 Page 265
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jaime Krueger <jaime-8'l'1 @yahoo.com >
Tuesday, April 9, 2024 8:42 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla;Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; bosone@edcgoV'us; [email protected]; bosfour@edcgoV'us; [email protected]; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen'l'garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSende rldentification l
CAUTIoN: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge you to study and explore what the proposed community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPhone

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From
Sent:

To:
suesamue14 <[email protected] >
Tuesday, April 9, 2024 8:38 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; edc.cob@edcgov'us; karen'l'garner@edcgov'us please move forward with studies for the proposed community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
Subject:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSenderlde ntification l
GAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Dylan and I live in Granite Bay and we go to church at Trinity Folsom. My mom is a BCBA who helps kids in all counties. I am an ALTA regional center client. I want to live somewhere near my parents and be independent, work and thrive. There are no safe planned housing communities for me in your counties or mine for me. Nothing' society talks a lot about other vulnerable groups but why not me?
please move forward with studies on the proposed community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23. lt may give me a chance of my dream of living independently in a safe well designed community for people with disabilities, seniors, health care workers and others. we are always overlooked and it's just assumed our parents take care of us until they die. That is not a good plan but the community for Health and lndependence does have a good plan. Please agree to study it.

Thank you for your consideration on behalf of all my friends with disabilities who just need a chance' Dylan Samuel
Age 23 with autism
With help from my mom, Sue Samuelto compose this to you all (916)7e2-006s

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Elaine Linn < [email protected] >
Tuesday, April 9, 202411:36 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; city clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ka [email protected] please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
[You don't often get emailfrom [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutsenderlde ntificatio n l
GAUTION: This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities' lt is a critical need' as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region' we urge you to study and explore what the proposed community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration.

Elaine Linn

91.6-799-6438
[email protected]
Please excuse typing errors. Sent from my iPhone
1

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:
lo:

Cristine Cabrera < [email protected] >
Tuesday, April 9, 2024 10:10 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; city clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; bostwo@edcgov'us; bosfour@edcgov'us; bosfive@edcgov'us; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l'garner@edcaov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on APril 23
Subject:
[You don't often get emailfrom [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSe nde rldentificatio n l
cAUTloN:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life, These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge you to study and explore what the proposed community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPhonel4 Pro Max
1 Page 269
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

NANCY Ll BBY < [email protected]>
Monday, April 8, 2024 9:07 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l.garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAbo utSenderlde ntificatio n l
CAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links oropen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Communityfor Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greatersacramento area which are specificallycreated foradultswith developmentaldisabilities' lt isa critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and Independence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Nancy and Bart Libby's
Eldorado county
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 270
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

David Nisson <[email protected]>
Monday, April B, 2024 6:49 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; bosfour@edcgov'us; bosfive@edcgov'us; kim.dawson @ edcgov.us; [email protected]; karen.l'garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAbo utsenderldentificatio n l
CAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life' The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region' we urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPad
1 Page 271
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

ALISON BU RT <[email protected] >
Monday, April 8, 2024 4'.09 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];bosfive@edcgov'us; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen'l.9arner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSe nderldentification l
CAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region' we urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population.

Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 272
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Monica Newton < [email protected]>
Monday, April B, 2024 2:33 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; bosfive@edcgov'us; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen'l'garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSenderldentificatio n l
cAUTtON:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
please consider making the Sacramento region a model for helping people with disabilities live a better life ! My 10 year old will out live me and I hope I can die knowing she will have a safe place to live and good people looking after her' Thank you ,
Monica Newton
I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region' we urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration.

Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 273
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Teresa Trimble <ttrimblel 1 [email protected]>
Monday, April B, 202410:22 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is im porta nt at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAbo utSenderldentification l CAUTION: This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmentaldisabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population.

Thank you for your consideration
Teresa Trimble
1 Page 274
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:
lo:

Lisette Chan < [email protected]>
Monday, April 8,2024 10:15 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAboutSenderldentification l
GAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or careSiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities' lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population.

Thank you for your consideration
1 Page 275
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Nancy Fischer < [email protected] >
Monday, April B, 2024 9'.21 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; bosfive@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[you don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka.ms/Lea rnAboutSenderldentification l
CAUTIoN:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmentaldisabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life' The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPad
1 Page 276
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Rondii Colson < [email protected] >
Sunday, April 7, 2024 6:38 AM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez;YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcaov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ki [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l.garner@ edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
Subject:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSe nderlde ntification l
CAUTION:This emailoriginated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask that you please move forward with studies on the proposed Community for Health and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for April 23.
lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to live, work, socialize, and recreate in communities of their choice, encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved quality of life. These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities in the greater Sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmental disabilities. lt is a critical need, as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housing options, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The Community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population' Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iPhone
1 Page 277
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Betsy Katz < [email protected] >
Saturday, April 6, 2024 2:33 pM
Mike Kozlowski; sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; yK Charamcherra;Anna Rohrbough;Christa Freemantre; pam Johns; city Crerk Dept; [email protected]; bosone@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];kim.dawson @edcgov.us; [email protected]; karen. [email protected] Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Hearth andlndependence on April 23 [Some people who received this message don,t often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this isimpo rta nt at https://a ka.ms/LearnAboutsenderrdentifrcation l cAUTloN:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not crick rinks or open attachments unress yourecognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. r am writing to you today to ask thatyou please move forward with studies on the proposed community for Hearth and rndependence, on your meetingagenda for April 23. lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to rive, work, sociarize, and recreate in communities oftheir choice' encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved qualityof life' These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordable residential communities inthe greater sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with deveiopmental disabilities. lt is a critical need,as most developmentally disabled adults live at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housingoptions, leaving them highry vurnerabre in their rater years oitir..

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, could meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge youto study and explore what the proposed community has to offer this important and long-overlooked population.

Thank you for your consideration
Sent from my iphone
1 Page 278
04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sanabria
From:

Sent:

To:

Kimberly Christensen <[email protected]>
Friday, April 5, 2024 3:04 PM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; YK Chalamcherla; Anna Rohrbough; Christa Freemantle; Pam Johns; City Clerk Dept; bosthree@edcaov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; karen.l.garner@edcgov'us Please move forward with studies for the proposed Community for Health and lndependence on April 23
!
l
:

Subject:

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]' Learn whv this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hetto,
I am a famity member and caregiver of a 2syear otd daughter with autism and devel,opmental detays. I am writing to you today to ask that you pLease move forward with studies on the proposed Community for HeaLth and lndependence, on your meeting agenda for Aprit23. lndividuats with devetopmentat disabil,ities deserve the benefit of housing, emptoyment and community Living opportunities, attowing greater independence and a better quatity of tife. As it stands, there are no safe, affordabte residential communities in the greater Sacramento area specificatty incLusive of adul.ts with devel.opmentatdisabil,ities. lt is a criticat need, as most deveLopmental.ty disabl.ed adutts tive at home with aging caregivers since there are few to no viabte affordabte housing oPtions.

The Community for Heatth and lndependence, as envisioned, coutd meet a tremendous need in our region. We urge you to study and expLore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and [ong-overtooked poputation.

Thank you for your consideration
Thank you,
Kim Christensen, MBA
Founder/Executive Director
Pathwavs to Emplovment
Leadership Council
National Council on Severe Autism

04/23/2024 Item No.11.

Karen Sana bria
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thank you for your consideration
Jill Beams
119 Hopfield Dr.

Folsom, Ca 95630
(91_6)2r3-s797
Sent from my iphone
Jill Hanson < [email protected] >
Thursday. Aprit 1 1, 2OZ4 2:16 pM
Mike Kozlowski; Sarah Aquino; Rosario Rodriguez; yK charamcherra; Anna Rohrbough;Christa Freemantle; pam Johns; City Clerk DepU [email protected];bosone@edcgov'us; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; edc.cobdedcAov.us; [email protected] move forwaro y']! studies for tie proposed Community for Hearth andlndependence on April 23 [You don't often get emair from [email protected]. Learn why this is important athttps://a ka. ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification l :#i?l;l,::frX|il:'l::"JJ;:TJ"tll",,*:: organization Do not crick rinks or open attachments unress you I am a family member and/or caregiver of a person with developmental disabilities. I am writing to you today to ask thatyou please move forward with studies on the proposed community for Hearth and rndependence, on your meetingagenda for April 23. lndividuals with developmental disabilities deserve opportunities to rive, work, sociarize, and recreate in communities oftheir choice' encouraging greater independence, access to vital resources such as health care, and an improved qualityof life' These opportunities will only be accessible to a few, as there are no safe, affordabre residentiar communities inthe greater sacramento area which are specifically created for adults with developmentat disabilities. lt is a critical need,as most developmentally disabled adults liv.e at home with aging caregivers due to the lack of affordable housingoptions, leaving them highly vulnerable in their later years of life.

The community for Health and lndependence, as envisioned, courd meet a tremendous need in our region. we urge youto study and explore what the proposed Community has to offer this important and rong-overrooked popuration. 1 Page 280
04/23/2024 Item No.11.