Folsom City Council
July 23, 2024

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
July 23, 2024, 6:30 PM

Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers generally have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, July 23, 2024 6:30 PM

Mike Kozlowski, Mayor

Sarah Aquino, Vice Mayor YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember Rosario Rodriguez, Councilmember Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Rohrbough, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez, Kozlowski The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as th e item will be continued to a future Council meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are generally limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

AGENDA UPDATE
CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

1. Approval of July 9, 2024 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

2. Appointment of Two At-Large Members to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to Represent the American River Canyon North #2 District and the Willow Springs District

3 3. Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to Amend the Zoning District for a 2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1) from R-1-ML and A-1-A to R-1-ML and to Amend the Zoning District for a 2.14- acre parcel (Lot 2) from A-1-A to R-1-ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential Project (Second Reading and Adoption)

4. Resolution No. 11237 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power for Replacement of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator
PUBLIC HEARING:

5. Ordinance No. 1347 – An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adopting Prima Facie Speed Limits on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway (Introduction and First Reading)

6. Resolution No. 11232 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect Such Charges on the Tax Roll

7. Resolution No. 11233 – A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 11172 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees

8. Resolution No. 11235 – A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 11219 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Planning

9. Resolution No. 11236 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer’s Report for the Following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge II/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
NEW BUSINESS:

10. Resolution No. 11234 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Conditionally Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City’s Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc. Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Loan Agreement and Related Documents for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units at the Proposed Harrington Grove Multifamily Affordable Housing Development, and Appropriation of Funds

COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will be in recess the first half of August.

The Council's next regular meeting
will be August 27, 2024.

4 NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGEND A SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City C ouncil meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Lib rary located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024
Gity Gouncil Special Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, July 09, 2024 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm with Mayor Kozlowski presiding ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Vice Mayor
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: None
ADJOURNMENT TO GLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(e)(3): Application for Leave to File a Late Claim by Larry Matias

2. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(e)(3): Application for Leave to File a Late Claim by Jude Chabot
Motion by Vice Mayor Aquino, second by Gouncilmember Rodriguez to adjourn to closed session. Motion passed by the following roll-callvote:

AYES: Aquino,Chalamcherla,Rodriguez,Rohrbough,Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session Draft - Not Official until Approved by the City Council Poge 1

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:30 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Mike Kozlowski, Mayor
Draft - Not Officiol until Approved by the City Council Poge 2

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024
Gity Gouncil Regular Meeting

MINUTES
Tuesday, July 09, 2024 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm with Mayor Mike Kozlowski presiding.

ROLL GALL:

Councilmembers Present: Sarah Aquino, Vice Mayor
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Councilmember
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was recited

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang advised that there was additional information for items 13 and 14.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speaker addressed the City Council:

1. Justin Raithel
SCH EDU LED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming July 21-27 ,2024 as National Zookeeper Week in the City of Folsom
Mayor Kozlowski presented the proclamation.

2. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming July 2024 as "Parks Make Life Better" Month
Mayor Kozlowski presented the proclamation.

Droft- Not Official until Approved by the City Council Page 7

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024
GONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

3. Approval of June 25, 2024 Special and Regular/Joint Meeting Minutes

4. Pulled for discussion

5. Resolution No. 11220 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 7 to the Memorandum of Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 18-087) Regarding Sharing of Costs for Legislative Advocacy Services Between San Juan Water District and the City of Folsom

6. Resolution No. 1 1221 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Renewal of the Service Agreement with Dropcountr, lnc. for Use of the Dropcountr Base Platform, Dropcountr Business and the HOME+ lrrigation Module for Two Years

7. Pulled for discussion

8. Resolution No. 1 1 226 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with NTU Technologies, lnc. for the Purchase of Chemicals for the Water Treatment Plant g. Resolution No. 11228 -A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 4 to the Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. for Additional National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Studies for the Folsom Placerville Rail Trail Project (Contract No. 173-21 17-013) and Appropriation of Funds

10. Resolution No. 11229 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. for Mangini Ranch Trails Project Design and Engineering (Contract No. 173-21 17-054)

11. Pulled for discussion

12. Receive Annual Report regarding Police Use of Military Type Equipment and Approve Resolution No. 11231 - A Resolution Renewing Ordinance No. 1326 and Determining That Specified "Military Equipment" Used by the Folsom Police Department has Complied with Standards for Approval Set Forth in State Law
Motion by Gouncilmember Rodriguez, second by Gouncilmember Chalamcherla, to approve item no. i, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12. Motion passed by the fotlowing roll-callvote:

AYES: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez, Rohrbough, Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR DISGUSSION:

4. Resolution No. 1 1218 - A Resolution to Declassify Five Landmark Trees Within the Joint Powers Authority Landmark Grove to Allow for Removal as Part of the Sacramento Regional Transit Light Rail Modernization 15 Minutes to Folsom Project The following speakers addressed the City Council:

Droft- Not Officiol untit Approved by the City Council Page 2

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024

1. Barbara Leary

2. Bruce Cline
Mayor Kozlowski spoke about walking the tree locations with the Vice Mayor, City Arborist and staff from RT. Councilmember Rohrbough commented about the removal of the trees, expressing concern about RT's continuing additional requests to remove additional trees beyond what was approved as part of the original project.

Motion by Councilmember Rodriguez, second by Vice Mayor Aquino, to approve Resolution No. 11218. Motion passed by the following roll-callvote:

AYES: Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez, Kozlowski
NOES: Rohrbough
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

7. Resolution No. 11224 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Systems Consulting, lnc. for Consulting Services for the Water Conservation Needs Assessment
Councilmember Chalamcherla pulled this item to comment about proposal evaluations.

Motion by Gouncilmember Ghalamcherla, second by Gouncilmember Rodriguez, to approve Resolution No.11224. Motion passed by the following roll'call vote:

AYES: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Rodriguez, Rohrbough, Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
1 1 . Resolution No. 11230 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Communications Site License Agreement with Dish Wireless, LLC at B.T. Collins Park Councilmember Rohrbough pulled this item for clarification about the placement of equipment, fees and maintenance. Parks and Recreation Senior Management Analyst Liz Vaage responded.

Motion by Councilmember Rohrbough, second by Gouncilmember Rodriguez, to approve Resolution No. 11230. Motion passed by the following roll-callvote:

AYES: Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez, Rohrbough, Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
PUBLIC HEARING:

13. Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to Amend the Zoning District for a2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1) from R-1-ML and A-1-A to R-1-ML and to Amend the Zoning District for a2.14-acre parcel (Lot 2) from A-1-A to R-1-ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project (lntroduction and First Reading)
Draft- Not Official until Approved by the City Council Poge 3

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-2124-001
Folsom Ci$ Council Minutes
July 9,2024
Community Development Department Principal Planner Jessica Brandt made a presentation to the City Council.

The public hearing was opened al7:12 pm. Receiving no requests to speak, the public hearing was closed al7:12 pm.

Motion by Councilmember Rodriguez, second by Gouncilmember Ghalamcherla to introduce Ordinance No. 1346. Motion passed by the following roll'callvote:

AYES: Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez, Rohrbough, Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Foundation Lutheran Pastor Dave Koelpin spoke briefly about their organization.

OLD BUSINESS:

14. Resolution No. 11227 - A Resolution Accepting a Progress Report to Date from the First River District Master Plan Citizens Advisory Committee and Authorizing the Formation of a Second River District Master Plan Citizens Advisory Committee
City Consultant Robert Goss made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Motion by Councilmember Rodriguez, second by Vice Mayor Aquino to pass Resolution No. 11227. Motion passed by the following roll-callvote:

AYES: Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Rodriguez, Rohrbough, Kozlowski NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Elaine Andersen spoke of cooling centers, the Folsom Zoo Sanctuary early closures due to the heat, waste collection schedule change for some residents, free Friday evening concerts series in the park, and National Night Out.

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Rodriguez spoke about the Chamber of Commerce Choose Folsom Rodeo, wished the City Manager a Happy Birthday, acknowledged Justin Raithel's recommendation regarding See Click Fix, and suggested recognition for the CERT team for volunteering at the Rodeo.

Councilmember Rohrbough thanked volunteers at the Rodeo, the CERT Team, CAPS and the Police and Fire Departments. Alio thanked the Fire Department for responding quickly to a fire during the 4th of July.

Droft- Not Official until Approved by the City Council Poge 4

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

File 034-21 24-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
July 9,2024
Councilmember Chalamcherla spoke about illegal fireworks in Folsom and additional help for pets during July 4th.

Vice Mayor Aquino had no comments.

Mayor Kozlowski spoke about the volunteers that worked in the fireworks booth, thanked the CERT Team, CAPS, the Police and Fire Departments and Rodeo volunteers, thanked the Vice Mayor for doing an outstanding job during the budget discussion. He explained that his absence from the last meeting was due to an out of town presentation he gave as a Regional Transit Board member, the upcoming graduation and promotion ceremony for the Fire Department, and an interview by ABC 10.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 7:31 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Mike Kozlowski, Mayor
Droft- Not Officiol until Approved by the City Council Poge 5

07/23/2024 Item No.1.

This poge is intentionolly Ieft blank
to fo,cilitate double- sided printtng
qnd minimize paper trse.

CITY OF
OISTINCTIVE 8Y NATURE
FOLSOl\{

07/23/2024 Item No.1.
t .::.r:1;r t: 1.I..i r:

Folsom Clty Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTIQN
Staff requests that the Mayor appoint two members (with approval from the City Council) to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to represent the American fuver Canyon North #2Dislrict and the Willow Springs District for terms ending in December 2024.

BACKGROI IND / ISSIIE
Folsom Municipal Code Chapter 16.56 establishes the Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee (L&L Committee) and defines the Committee's purpose as helping to enhance the line of communication between city staff and elected/appointed city bodies. The citizens' committee may also make recommendations to the Landscaping and Lighting District Manager, the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director concerning the maintenance and associated costs to maintain and improve landscaping and lighting districts.

The Committee is comprised of one person from each landscaping and lighting district. The members shall be registered voters and residents or owners within their respective landscaping and lighting district and serve for a period offour years (unless they are appointed to serve the remainder of an unfilled term).
1 MEETING DATE: 712312024
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Appointment of Two At-Large Members to the Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee to Represent the American River Canyon North #2 District and the Willow Springs District
FROM: City Clerk's Department

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

POLICY/ RULE
Folsom Municipal Code Section 16.56.030(8) states that the mayor shall appoint each of the Landscaping and Lighting District Advisory Committee members, subject to the approval of the City Council.

ANALYSIS
The L&L Committee continues to have vacancies for certain districts, and staff maintains an open recruitment for these vacancies. Applications have recently been received for the American River Canyon North #2vacant seat from Mark Klovee and for the Willow Springs vacant seat from Paul Romero.

Staff has confirmed that the applicants' addresses are within the identified districts and that they are registered voters; therefore, they are eligible to be appointed.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Application from Mark Klovee - American River Canyon North #2 District

2. Application from Paul Romero - Willow Springs District Respectfully submitted,
Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk
2 Page 14
07/23/2024 Item No.2.

ATTACHMENT 1
Application from Mark Klovee
American River Canyon North #2

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FOLSI}M CIT? CLERK'S DEPT
5 JUL'24 pu2:45
a\{Folsom Commission and Committee

APPLICATTON
lhank pn for your intcrest ln eerving on a Fobom ommlcclon or commltte.

BcfonoYou Bcglnr
. Please rcad this form and instructions car€ftlly.
. Comileteall pagcc and sign the applicadon.
. lpplicetionsrcmainactiveforsix monthsaftersubmittal-
Retum complc*cd applicrdonr to:

City Oerk's Departnent, Foloom City Hall, 5o Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630 Appltcrnt Infonmadon: (All infrrmation ir required)
Namc:

Residenc€ Addr€sg:

Email:

Phone:

Employer and Occupation:
4rc -dfl - qwb
r^8 klo
Crrrruntly Serving on a Commi*rion/Commlttee? If 1nr, plerse rpecify:

Fofuom1pri enqf / ncgfutcrcdVotcrVcr{f,ordon; Commirsionand0ommlttcmcmbcrumugtbe regidentg and regietered rloterr of Folsom.

Registeredtovote? IndicateYe/No y?/<,
Ftnanclal Dtcdosutc / Elhlcc Thtntng:

Indlcate Yon /No:

I understandthatcommissionand committee membersmust file statements disclosing financial information.

I understand that commission and committee members must complete ethics and harassment training.
thrth and Accuracy: I certi& that the infornration contained on this fotm is tme and accurate:
ladicrteYor/ I'b:
yes
Dats: *Slgnrturu:
lmportrnt hrbllc Rccordr Informrtlonr ltc clty mey rccclvc IGqlcEtt-FB the public to ruview documentg ouch ac t1t -form ina ttri ctry f oHlgptad to relcaga thsrc pubfic rciordr, including all informstion contalned on the fonn.

Updatod Fcbnary zoee
Page l of tl

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FOI,SOM COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE APPLICAIION
/rt AKI< /4nV6€ApplicantName:

Cholcc of Commtmlon or Commlttee:
(If you ane intererted in nultiple commiasione , please rank them numerically according to your prefer€nce) Arts anal Culturc Commiscion
Hietodc Disdct Commlsslonr
PlcasE idcnti$ which seat you qudify for:
representativewhoisactivelyinvolved-withhistoricpreservation ""p'*'"ot"tio"whoisaresidentoftheHistoricDishictrepresentativewho owns a business within the Sutter Street Subarer Pl gqni n g Commissione_rs
*p*it"tiu"from a Histodc Dishict business outside the Sutter Street Subarea archltect, landscape architecg or other design professional with experdse in hletoric preservation & Landscaping anrl Lighting Dishict Advisory Commlttee* Please advise which L&L Distdct ]'ou live in:
oPtL
u2
Districtof Residence:

LibraryCommission
Parks and Recreation Commission
PlanrringCommiseion
Ttaffi c SafctY Committee*
Pleaee identify which sert you qudify forl
representativerepresentingawidecrosssectionofinterests
representatve who has demonstrated an interest in or r concern for pedestrian and bicyde safety UtilitYCommission
Other:
rApplication Supplement Reqrrir- ed: .
ri##:*rffi rff#Hn:Ifr':*',m1trffi ilil,ffi *ffi ,el'*Jsim$$*Hs @ndnucto n€xtPrgc

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FOISOM COMMISSION AI{D COMMITTEE APPUC'ATION
ApplicantName:
fnfomradonal quectionsr (you must answer all four questions, for all commissions or committees you are applying for):
r. Whydopuwantto cerve on thts commlesionorornrnittee;
ftty t"€/t4ba* Dttve v4m' te'*vd- i't L+L 'f}vfuu'
&o ft rtpt/e< >4f***: *r& fho"d*+ L woql/ be
h 5roo8 {;i 4,r hfs Pyl*el+e,MY
a. What do you think is(are) the top lssue(s) frcing tlds commission or committee:

L weulA lt t^4/ # /e**p Bbau/ *l'rG+-
Contlnucto ncxt Prgo
!
Pagc 3 of4

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FOISOM COMMISSION AriID COMMITTEE APPLICATION
ApplicantName: //, fl-il( KLovte
S. Brieflydescribchowyourexperiencecqualifyyouto8srveonthecommissionorcomm)@' b, t { il*VA { fiPYa ho ttr'[ ryf"*tdt'e )ru fLis **u
/t- lc-e-e.u lnte*et'l 'r I vwl
^**'n,
ft'|/ t'wulA /)b
+? le'n*at * tl *['d't X d''rv'

4. Which commission or eommlttec mcetingc havc you attended? .

NCN7 fr;';';*;'#,"* i"i Viiit wpt^ti bc''tu thu Nqf
FNv d bu/(e"* )* s?f

ENDOFAPPIJCATTONFORM
Grwocrrcsp"prrtrloffi "?triTt:it,1tfll$1"'T#,,Forcom,c,Aps6eo

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Application from Paul Romero
Willow Springs

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FNL5Oh.1 T1TY CLERI('S OEPT
1? tilfiV !?q AHS:42
[\uFolsom Commission and Committee

APPLICATION
Thank you for your interest in serving on a Folsom commission or committee.

BeforeYouBegln:
. Please read this form and instructions carefully'
. Complete all pages and sign the application.
. Applications remain active for slx months after submittal.

Rerturn completed appHcations to:

City Clerk's peparmrent, folsom City Hall, 5o Natoma Street, Folsom, C'A gS6go Applicarrt Information: (All information is required)
Name PaulRomero
Residence Address:

Emsil: paulromerolorr@ gmall.com
Phone:916 221-8895
Employer and Ocorpation: Retireil Manager/Profeseional
Currently Serving on a Commission/Committee? [f yes, please Folcom Rccldency/ ReglcteredVoterVerflfrcadon: Commission and Committee members mustbe residents and registered voters of Folsom.

Registered to vote? Indicate Yes I No
financtal Dlsdosure / Ethlcc Traintng:

IndicateYes / No: Yes
I understandthat and commiftee members must file statements disdosing financial
I understand that commtsslon and committee members must cornplete ethics and harassment Ifnrth and Aeuracyr I certify that the information contained on this form is true and acsurate:
sudr as

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

Updated february eoea
FOIIIOM COMMISSION AT.ID COMMITTEE
APPLICATION Applicant Name: Paul Romero
Cholcc of Commi,ecion or Committee;
(If you are interested in multiple commissions, please rank them numerically according to your prefercnce) ;trts and Culture Cornmission
Jlistorlc District Commission"
Please identi$ which seat you qualifr for:
_ representative who is actively involvedwith historic preservation -
reprcsentadve who is a resident of the Historic District representative who owns a business within the Sutter Street Subarea -
Planning Commissioners
_ represen-tative from a Historic District business ouBide the Sutter Street Subarea -.."Uitect,
landscape architect, or other desrgn professional with expertise in historic preservetion and Lighting Dishict Advisory Committee*
Please advise whidr I&L District you live in: Willow Springs District of Residence: Council District TWo (Marsh Hawk Drive) -Library Commission
-Parks and Recreation Commission
.Plennurg Commisslon
-Traf fi c Safety Committe€r
Pleas€ identify wtrich seat you quali$ for:
-
representative representing a wide cross sectlon oflnterests _ rrepresentative wio has demonstrated an interest in or a concern for pedestrian and bicycle safety UtilityCommission
Other:
tApplicadon $upplement Requlred I
Suiilemental information is requircd for the Historic District Commission, Landscape and Lighting District - Advisory Committee, and the trifrc Safety Committee. Ttrese boards have special qualification requirements for certain seats.

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

Condnue to nextpage
Page?of 4
FOISOM COMMISSION ANID COMMI]:IEE
APPTICATION Applicant Name: Paul Romero
Infomrtional Question$ (you must answer all four questions, for all commissions or committees you are applying for):
r. Why do you want to serm on this comrnission or comrnittee: I sened on the Parks and Recreation Commission for nine years and forurd it to be very rewarding. I personally believe that people need to give back to their community snd sinae I can uo longer offer grridance in the hekl where I spent most of my career, I think that the landscape and tightiug Dfotrict Committee would be most akin to my primary inteitst and knowleilge. I sened es a top adininiitrator in eoveral potiticel jurisdicdons and the CAO of a mrjor metropolitan wator dietrict so I beliEve that knowledge and oxperience can bs an asset to ths Committce. a. What do you think is(are) tho top ixue(e) fadng this commission or committee: Most likely the nee{1o d9 mo-re with ltmiteri/restrictod income, I also suepee thafeffiectirte management is e challenge with junior 9laffJgadingthe committee insteail of a top manager. Sho*-term and long-term planning is critical when <lealing with a limited funding source and my erperience in leaderehip and top-lovel management may be an asset.

Continueto ncxtpage

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

FOLSOM COMMISSION AIID COMMITTEE
APPLICATION Applicant Name Paul Romero
g. Briefly descrlbe how yoru elEeriences qualify you to seryc on the commission or comrnittee:
previous employment as: Chief Deputy Director of the California $tate Park System; Chief Administrative Offrcer of the Santa c:lira Vallev W"i"r nirtri.t, birector of the Environmental Resources Agency, County of Santa Clara, Parks Director, Counry of S-anta Clara, General Manager of the Riverside County Parks and Open $pace pishict, and Executive Director, California Association of Park and Recreation Commissioners and Board Members.

Lifetime Cornmunity College Credential, #89g5z, Public Servlces andAdministradon; Certiffcate UC Berkeley' Str"t"Ci.Ivtanagement and-publis Policy; and numerous awards and certiffcates including Certificge of Recognition from *esidentbeorge H.W. Sush for dxcellence in Environment and Conservation Initiatives and $olutions.

I klieve myhistory and orperience, noted above, makes rne qualified to sente on the Committee. 4, Which commission or committee meetings have you attended? Park and Recreation Commission meeting for nine V""o. f have notyet attendedthe tandscape and Lighting District C,ommittee meetings. I frequentlyattend meetings of the city Council and as the Chair of the Park and Recreation Commission, I presented at the Council meetings.

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

ENDOFAPPUCATION FORM
Return completed appllcatione to:

City Clerk's Department, Folsom City Hall, 5o Natoma Street, Folsom, CA gS63o

07/23/2024 Item No.2.

This page is intentionqllA Ieft blank
to focilitote double- sided printtng
and minimize paper ttse.

CITY OF

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE
FOLSON{

07/23/2024 Item No.2.
, :, : ,' - .1 ;, 'r':1
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 712312024
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential - 1000 and 1010 East Natoma Street (ZCAM24-001 1 2)
i. Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to Amend the Zoning District for a2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1) from R-l- ML and A- I -A to R- I -ML and to Amend the Zoning District for a2.14-acre parcel (Lot2) from A-1-A to R-I-ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project (Second
Reading and Adoption)
FROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Conduct a second reading of and move to adopt Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to amend the zoning district for a2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1, Assessor Parcel Number 071-1970-003) from R-I-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A-l-A (Agricultural-Reserve District) to R-I-ML and to amend the zoning district for a2.14-acre parcel (Lot2,Assessor Parcel Number 071-1970-004) from A-1-A to R-I-ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project (Second Reading and Adoption).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The subject parcels are located at 1000 and 1010 EastNatoma Street, onthe north side of East Natoma Street, east of the intersection of Briggs Ranch RoadiFolsom Point Road and EastNatoma Street. Single-family residential development is located to the south and east, with a church use to the west across Folsom Point Road, and the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area abuts the parcels to the north. The parcels have rolling topography, with driveways from both Folsom Point Road and East Natoma Street serving the parcels. 1000 East Natoma is developed with a3,870 square foot single-family residence built in 1980 and 1010 East Natoma with a 1,200 square foot garage with an unknown build date.

I

07/23/2024 Item No.3.
ln 2003, a Director-level Design Review for minor improvements to the residence at 1000 East Natoma was approved (Project Number AR03-00236). Minor building permits have been approved orr"r th" ensuing 20 years for general residential maintenance. The parcels were sold to the cunent owners in 2018 and used as rental property. In2020, City staff were made aware that the residence at 1000 East Natoma was being used as a short-term rental and event venue, though their business license for that location was only for a property rental. Multiple violation notices were issued over the next few years for noise and use complaints.ln2023, the owners were informed by staff that continued use of the property as a vacation rental and/or event center would require rezoning the property and approval of a Conditional Use Permit' Rather than pursue entitlements to legitimize current uses, the owners decided to place the parcels up for sale. City staff were approached by representatives of a religious congregation (Foundation Lutheran) in early 2024 to discuss whether a church could be established on the site. Staff informed the representatives that the current zoning of A-l-A that covers most of the site does not allow church use. However, a rezoning to a residential zone, such as R-l-ML, which does permit churches with a use permit, would be supported as it would make the zoning consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation of SF (Single Family). The representatives moved forward with submitting a request to rezone the parcels to R-I-ML and are undergoing pre-application review for a proposed church facility on the site. If Council approves the rezone, the applicant would still be required to obtain a separate Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Commission.

On May 15,2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project. The Commission asked if this rezoning would impact any active agricultural uses or require a rezoning of other properties to make up for the loss of agriculturally zoned land. Staff confirmed that the properties are not used for agricultural pu{poses, *d tttut there is no requirement to rezor:re other properties to make up for the reduction of agriculturally zoned land. Staff further clarified that the intent of the A-1-A zoning district is to piovide areas for interim agricultural or livestock grazing uses until services are available to iupport urban development, which is the case in this situation. There were no public comments on the proposal, and the Planning Commission voted 6-0-1 (one Commissioner absent) to recommend approval of the request, based on the findings included in the Planning Commission report.

POLICY / RULE
Per the requirements of Govemment Code Section 65860, a city's zoning ordinance must be consistent with its general plan. If a zoning ordinance is inconsistent with a general plan, the zoning ordinance should be amended within a reasonable time so that it is consistent with the general plan.

Folsom Municipal Code GMq Sections 17.68.040 and 17.68.050 require that applications for rezones be forwarded to the City Council for final action with a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
2 Page 28
07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ANALYSIS
Conformance with Relevant General Plan Goals and Policies The City of Folsom General Plan (2035) outlines a number of goals, policies, and implementation programs designed to guide the physical, economic, and environmental growth of the City. Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan goals and policies as outlined and discussed below:

GP POLrcY LU 1.1.1 (Zoning Ordinance)
Ensure that the Folsom Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan.

Analysis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that it includes rezoning the project site from R-l-ML and A-1-A to R-l-ML. The General Plan designation of SF allows for 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre. The A-1-A zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 50 acres and restricts urban development. The R-I-ML zoning district, in contrast, requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, which would allow up to four dwelling units per acre. Changing the zoning on the project site to R-l-ML both cleans up the error of two zoning districts on one parcel and allows for the type of development density contemplated by the SF designation.

GP POLrcY LU 6.1.1 (Complete Neighborhoods)
Encourage the establishment of o'complete neighborhoods" that integrate schools, childcare centers, parks, shopping and employment centers, and other amenities.

Analysis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project includes rezoning the project site from R-I-ML and A-1-A to R-l-ML. The uses permitted in the A-1-A zoning district are limited to agricultural and livestock grazing and accessory residential. The R-l-ML zoning district, in contrast, allows single-family residential uses by right and conditionally permits uses such as schools, golf courses, and churches that can serve as amenities to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Changing the zoning on the project site to R-l-ML allows for the potential for a more "complete neighborhood" as encouraged by this General Plan policy.

General Plan and Zoning Consistency
The General Plan land use designation for the two parcels is SF (Single Family) and the zoning districts are R-l-ML and A-1-A for 1000 East Natoma Street, and A-1-A for 1010 East Natoma Street. The existing General Plan land use designation (SF) and the existing zoning district of A- l-A are not consistent with each other as the SF General Plan land use designation is intended to provide opportunities for development of single-family detached homes and single-family attached ho-es, wiiit" the A-1-A zoning district was established to provide areas for interim agricultural and livesto ck grazing uses until such time as cofilmunity services are available for urban development. As described in the background section of this staff report, the project site is developed with one single family residence on APN 071-1970-003 and an outbuilding on APN 07I-1970-004. The two parcels have been sold and used together, despite parcelization in 1981.

J Page 29
07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Adjacent parcels along East Natoma Street have General Plan land use (SF to the west and SFHD [Single Family High Density] to the east) and zoning (R-l-ML to the west and R-l-M (PD) fSingle Family Residential - Small Lot-Planned Development]) districts to the west that are consistent with each other. The proposed rezone to change the zoning for the subject parcels from R-l-ML/A- 1-A and A-1-A would result in the General Plan land use and the zoning districts being consistent with each other in the same mannef as adjacent properties to the west.

Further, residential development was contemplated for this site as demonstrated by the SF General Plan land use designation The proposed rezone is warranted to remove the split zoning on the project site and allow for the urban development called for in the parcel's existing SF General Plan designation. Staff determined that development allowed by the proposed R-I-ML zoning, either by right or with a Conditional Use Permit, would be compatible with existing land uses in the project arca and that the request is consistent with all relevant General Plan goals and policies.

Finally, urban services (water and sewer) are available to the property, which negates the need to retain the A-1-A zoning district. As a result, staff is supportive of the rezot:re.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact is anticipated with approval of the rezorLe.

ENVIRO AI, REVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report was previously approved for the City of Folsom General Plan on August 28,2018,in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has determined that no new impacts will result from the proposed project that were not already considered with the previous approval because the General Plan land use designation for both parcels is already SF. The project therefore does not require additional environmental review under Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zonng) of the CEQA Guidelines. Further, per the requirements of Government Code Section 65860, residential development is already allowed as permitted by the SF General Plan land use designation even though the current agricultural zoning conflicts with the SF designation.

This eliminates the need to analyze potential impacts from a possible increase in density due to the proposed rezone.Finally, any new site development is discretionary and would require subsequent proj ect-specifi c CEQA review.
4 Page 30
07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to amend the zoning district for a2.47- acre parcel (Lot l) from R-I-ML and A-1-A to R-I-ML and to amend the zoning district for a2.14-acre parcel (Lot2) from A-1-A to R-I-ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project (Second Reading and Adoption).

2. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated }l4lay 15,2024

3. Minutes from May 15,2024, Planning Commission Meeting

4. Vicinity Map
Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
5 Page 31
07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. 1346 - An Uncodified Ordinance to amend the zoningdistrict for a 2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1) from R-I-ML and A-1-A to R-I-ML and to amend the zoning district for a 2.L4-acre parcel (Lot2) from A-1-A to R-1- ML for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential project (Second Reading and Adoption).

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ORDINANCE NO. 1346
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 2.47.

ACRE PARCEL (LOT 1) FROM R-I-ML AND A-1-A TO R-I-ML AND TO AMEND THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR A2.14-ACRE PARCEL (LOT 2) FROM A-1-A TO R-1- ML FOR THE 1OOO EAST NATOMA REZONE TO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on May 75,2024, considered the proposed rezone of two parcels associated with the East Natoma Rezone to Residential project and determined that the proposed rezone was appropriate given the parcels' Single Family Residential General Plan land use designation and existing residential land uses in the project vicinity; and
WHEREAS' all notices have been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and the Folsom Municipal Code.

NOW' THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Folsom does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the zoning district for a2.47-acre parcel (Lot 1) from R-l-ML and A-1-A to R-l-ML and to amend the zoning district for a2.14-acre parcel (Lot 2) from A-1-A to R-I-ML, to bring the zoning districts into compliance with the properties' General Plan land use designation of SF (Single-Family).

SECTION 2 AMENDMENT
The Zoning Map districts for Assessor Parcel Numbers 071-1970-003 and 071-1970-004 are hereby amended from R-I-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A-1-A (Agricultural-Reserve District) to R-1-ML as set forth on Exhibit A.

SECTION 3 SCOPE
Except as set forth in this ordinance, all other provisions of the Folsom Municipal Code shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 4 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or arly part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council declares that it would have passed each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 5 EFFECTIVE DATE
Ordinance No. 1346

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in full or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 9,2024 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 23,2024.

On a motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this 23fiday of July, 2024, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1346
Page2 of4 Page 34
07/23/2024 Item No.3.

E,XHIBIT $A))
Ordinance No. 1346
Page3 of4 Page 35
07/23/2024 Item No.3.
:90
0a o.Otr'.F6
Y- ?)
5oz
9 UJ
so\
IOOO & lOlO E. Natoma Street - Rezone Exhibit
Erdsting Zoning DeaigRation Froposed Zonine Designation Iegend
; Ar1 A :_, osc
tc-1 PDmR-l-i'tPD
R-t-lrllL
ft{).Lf!(lll
R4{LR-t.tL

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 15,2024

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Type: Public Hearing
Date: May 1 5,2024

OITY OF
ti'oLsoll{
Project:

File #:

Request:

Location:

APN:

Staff Gontact:

Property Owner
Name: Benny Mathew
Address: 1000 East Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Planning Gommission Staff RePort
50 Natoma Street, Council Chambers
Folsom, CA 95630
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential
zcAM24-00112
Rezone
1000 and 1010 East Natoma Street
071-1970-003 and -004
Jessica Brandt, Principal Planner, 916-461 -6207
[email protected]
Applicant
Name: David Koelpin
Address: 1200 Eschelman Court
Folsom, CA 95630
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion recommend to the City Council approval of a Rezone to change the zoning forthe parcels located at 1000 East Natoma Street (currently split zoned R-1-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A-1-A (Agricultural-Reserve District)) and 1010 East Natoma Street (currently zoned A-1-A), to R-1-ML for both parcels, as illustrated on Attachment 5 based on the findings (Findings A-l) attached to this report.

Project Summary: The request is to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 4.3 acres at the northeast corner of East Natoma Street and Folsom Point Road from a split zone of R-1-ML and A-1-A for 1000 East Natoma Street, and A-1-A for 1010 East Natoma Street to R-1-ML for both parcels. This will make the zoning consistent with the parcels' Single (SF) Family General Plan designation and allow for the potential of a church use with a Conditional Use Permit. No site development is proposed as part of this request.

Table of Gontents:
1 - Description/Analysis
2 - Background
3 - Vicinity Map
4 - Site Photographs
5 - Draft Rezone Ordinance with Rezone Exhibit

07/23/2024 Item No.3.
ctlt ol
Dl!tlicttvS !Y NAluRl
FOLS()1rI
Submifted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
ATTACHMENT 1

DESCRIPTION/ ANALYSIS

APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
The applicant, David Koelpin, is requesting approval of a rezone for two parcels totaling approximately 4.3 acres at the northeast corner of East Natoma Street and Folsom Point Road from a split zone of R-1-ML and A-1-A for 1000 East Natoma Street, and A-1-A for 1010 East Natoma Street, to R-1-ML for both parcels. This will make the zoning consistent with the parcels' SF General Plan designation and allow for the potential of a church use with a Conditional Use Permit under Section 17.12.030 of the Folsom Municipal Code (FMC). No site development is proposed as part of this rezone request.

POLICY/RULE
Per the requirements of Government Code Section 65860, a city's zoning ordinances must be consistent with its general plan. lf a zoning ordinance is inconsistent with a general plan, the zoning ordinance should be amended within a reasonable time so that it is consistent with the general plan.

Folsom Municipal Code (EMC) Chapters 17.68.040 and 17.68.50 require that applications for rezones be fonrvarded to the City Council for final action with a recommendation from the Planning Commission.

ANALYSIS
Conformance with Relevant General Plan Goals and Policies The City of Folsom General Plan (2035) outlines a number of goals, policies, and implementation programs designed to guide the physical, economic, and environmental growth of the City. Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan goals and policies as outlined and discussed below:

GP POLICY LU 1.1.1 (Zoning Ordinance)
Ensure that the Folsom Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan.

Analvsis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that it includes rezoning the project site from R-1-ML and A-1-A to R-1-ML. The General Plan designation of SF allows lor 2lo 4 dwelling units per acre. The A-1-A zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 50 acres and restricts urban development. The R- 1-ML zoning district, in contrast, requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, which would allow up to four dwelling units per acre. Changing the zoning on the project site to R-1-ML both cleans up the error of two zoning designations on one lot and allows for the type of development density contemplated by the SF designation.

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
GP POLICY LU 6.1.1 (Complete Neighborhoods)
Encourage the establishment of "complete neighborhoods" that integrate schools, childcare centers, parks, shopping and employment centers, and other amenities.

Analysis: The proposed project is consistent with this policy in that the project includes rezoning the project site from R-1-ML and A-1-A to R-1-ML. The uses permitted in the A-1-A zoning district are limited to agricultural and livestock grazing and accessory residential. The R-1-ML zoning district, in contrast, allows iingle-family residential uses by right and conditionally permits uses such as schbols, golf courses, and churches that can serve as amenities to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Changing the zoning on the project site to R-1-ML allows for the potentialfor a more "complete neighborhood" as encouraged by this General Plan policy.

General Plan and Zoninq Consistencv
The General Plan land use designation for the two parcels is SF (Single Family) and the zoning designations are R-1-ML and A-1-A for 1000 East Natoma Street, and A-1-A for 1010 East Natoma Street. The existing General Plan land use designation (SF) and the existing zoning designation of A-1-A are not consistent with each other as the SF General Plan land usetesignation is intended to provide opportunities for development of single- family detached homes and single-family attached homes, while the A-1-A zoning designation was established to provide areas for interim agricultural and livestock grazing useJ until such time as community services are available for urban development. As described in the background section of this staff report, the project site is developed with one single family residence on APN 071-1970-003 and an outbuilding on APN 071-1970- 004. The two parcels have been sold and used together, despite parcelization in 1981.

Adjacent parcels along East Natoma Street have General Plan land use (SF to the west ani SfHO [Single Family High Density] to the east) and zoning (R-1-ML to the west and R-1-M (PD) tsingle Family Residential - Small LoUPlanned Developmentl) designations to the west that are consistent with each other. lmages of the site and the zoning designations of the surrounding parcels are provided in Attachments 4 and 5 respectively.

The proposed rezone to change the zoning for the subject parcels from R-1-ML/A-1-A and A-1-A would result in the General Plan land use and the zoning designations being consistent with each other in the same manner as adjacent properties to the west.

Further, residential development was contemplated for this site as demonstrated by the SF General Plan land use designation The proposed rezone is warranted to remove the split zoning on the project site and allow for the urban development called for in the parcel's existing SF General Plan designation. Staff determined that development allowed by the proposed R-1-ML zoning, either by right or with a Conditional Use Permit, would be compatible with existing land uses in the project area and that the request is consistent with all relevant General Plan goals and policies. Finally, urban services (water and sewer) are available to the property, which negates the need to retain the A-1-A zoning designation. As a result, staff is supportive of the rezone.

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 Eist Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental lmpact Report was previously approved for the City of Folsom General plan on August 28, 2018, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental euality Act (CEQA). Staff has determined that no new impacts will result from the proposed project that were not already considered with the previous approval because the General Plan land use designation for both parcels is already SF. The project therefore does not require additional environmental review under Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Further, per the requirements of Government Code Section 65860, residential development is already allowed as permitted by the SF General Plan land use designation even though the current agriculturalzoning conflicts with the SF designation' This negates the need io analyze potential impacts from a possible increase in density due to the proposed rezone. Finally, any new site development is discretionary and would require subsequent project-specific CEQA review'

RECOMMEN DATION/PLANNI NG COMMISSION ACTION
Move to recommend that the City Council approve a rezone for two parcels totaling approximately 4.3 acres at the northeast corner of East Natoma Street and Folsom Point Road from split zoning between R-1-ML and A-1-A (1000 East Natoma), and A-1-A (1010 East Natoma), to R-1-ML for both parcels as illustrated on Attachment 5 for the 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential Project (ZCAM24-0O112) based on the findings (Findings A-l) attached to this rePort.

GENERAL FINDINGS
A. NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

WITH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT, THE PARCEL ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY.

REZONE FINDING
C. FOR THE REASONS DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT, THE PUBLIC NECESSITY

AND CONVENIENCE AND THE GENERAL WELFARE REQUIRE A REZONE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM A.1-A TO R-1-ML.

CEQA FINDINGS
D. AN ENVTRONMENTAL tMpAcT REPORT (ElR) WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM GENERAL PLAN ON AUGUST 28, 2018, IN B

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
E.

F.

G
H
t.

ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVTRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEOA).

THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL RESULT IN PARCEL ZONING
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION.

THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL KEEP THE PARCEL CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DENSITY APPROVED IN THE GENERAL PLAN.

NO NEW IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM THE PROPOSED REZONE THAT

WERE NOT ALREADY CONSIDERED WITH THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN EIR.

ANY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED FOR THE SITE WILL BE

ANALYZED TO EVALUATE POTENTIAL PROJECT SPECIFIC
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OR EXEMPT STATUS.

NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR THIS APPLICATION.

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
ATTACHMENT 2

BACKGROUND

BACKGROUND
The subject parcels are located at 1000 and 1010 East Natoma Street, on the north side of East Natoma Street, east of the intersection of Briggs Ranch Road/Folsom Point Road and East Natoma Street. Single-Family residential property is located to the south and east, with a church use to the west across Folsom Point Road, and the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area abuts the parcels to the north. The parcels have rolling topography, with driveways from both Folsom Point Road and East Natoma Street serving both parcels. 1000 East Natoma is developed with a 3,870 square foot single-family residence built in 1g80 and 1010 East Natoma with a 1 ,200 square foot garage with an unknown build date. ln 2003, a Director Level Design Reviewwas approved at 1000 East Natoma (Project Number AR03-00236). Minor building permits have been approved over the ensuing 20 years for general residential maintenance. The parcels were sold to the current owners in 2O1A anO used as rental property. ln 2020, City staff were made aware that the residence at 1000 East Natoma was being used as a short-term rental and event venue, though their business license for that location was only for a property rental. Multiple violaiion notices were issued over the next few years for noise and use complaints' ln 2O2g, the owners were informed by staff that continued use of the property as a vacation rental and/or event center would require rezoning the property and approval of a Conditional Use Permit.

Rather than pursue entitlements to legitimize current uses, the owners decided to place the parcels up for sale. City staff were approached by representatives of a religious congregation (Foundation Lutheran) in early 2024 to discuss whether a church could be esta-ntiJfred on the site. Staff informed the representatives that the current zoning of A-1- A that covers most of the site does not allow church use. However, a rezoning to a residential zone, such as R-1-ML, which does permit churches with a use permit, would be supported as it would make the zoning consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation of SF. The representatives moved forward with submitting a request to rezone tlie parcels to R-1-ML and are undergoing pre-application review for a proposed church facility on the site.

GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION SF (Single Family)
ZONING R-1-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling,
Medium Lot District) and A-1-A (Agricultural-
Reserve District) for 1000 East Natoma Street,
and A-1-A for 1010 East Natoma Street.

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Planning Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024

ADJACENT LAND USES/ZONING

SITE CHARACTERISTICS

APPLICABLE CODES
North: Folsom Lake State Recreation Area
(A-1-A)
South: East Natoma Street with Residential
Property (R-1 -MlPDl) BeYond
East: Small Lot Residential Development
(R-1-MlPDl)
West: Folsom Point Road with a Church
Facility (R-1-M) Beyond
The site is comprised of two parcels that have
rolling topography, with driveways from both
Folsom Point Road and East Natoma Street.
1000 East Natoma is developed with a 3,870
square foot single-family residence built in
1980 and 1010 East Natoma Street with a
1,200 square foot garage with an unknown
build date.

FMC Chapter 17.12, R-1-ML, Residential,
Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District
FMC Chapter 17.35, A-1-A, Agricultural-
Reserve District
FMC Chapter 17.68.040 and 17.68.50,
Amendments
FMC Chapter 17.68, Amendments
Government Code Section 65860, Zoning
Consistency with General Plan, Enforcing
Consistency

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Historic District Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
Attachment 3
Vicinity Map

07/23/2024 Item No.3.
\,rt t1r r..r F
I i\) APN: 071 1 97000300S0
Frint dsle; #26/fl1f4
#i!.
'-'.itb.*".-
!' t': .-'.'ri*tr
3 I.AKE STATE
.s*
'f
4,.Jl
ftn
il.i' ' r
i- r '::---+..+r1:' . -.t-s i.,,..-;
:'*tr':; iFh,
.@
ATTACHMENT 3 . VICINITY MAP
i" = 3[$'
11$t'rlarunr,l tf,e flccJ.acl a. tonrl:l+':+r,*as *f th 9ltfii] tii,lLei arrl tl:er+fc'e Ji$*!ellls nll :i(i:iitl f.,r ile ltnssl of ute, F.l
l-l

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Historic District Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
Attachment 4
Site Photographs

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENT 4 SITE PHOTOS
Site from the intersection of E Natoma and Fotsom Point Road, facing northeast Search Google Mirps o,o
q 99 Ranch Markel
6^
.{ll
st
99 Randh
Site from E Natoma Street east of the Fotsom Point Road intersection, facing northwest.

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

F
fr
,#
fi
,SJ
A
a
#
ltrkt rlL\,; , ,j,'ri rl,li r,, I
t
!.) t;rtrrbr:r n l )l)1i{lu(' Ail.1ly';l ol}ll(llr.' vr('v/('l 3 lrrJ.!;,s :T 'i'?
'i.il.

Site obtique imagery from 2018, facing south

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Historic District Commission
1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential (ZCAM24-00112)
May 15,2024
Attachment 5
Draft Rezone Ordinance with Rezone Exhibit

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

DRAFT ORDINAI\CE NO. ####
AI\ UNCODIFIED ORDINAI{CE OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM TO AMEND THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR THE 4.3.ACRE PROJECT SITE FROM R-I.ML (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, MEDIUM LOT DISTRICT) AI\D A.1- A (AGRTCULTURAL-RESERVE DTSTRTCT) (APN 07 | -197 0 -003 -0000) AND A- 1 -A (ApN 071-1970-003-0000) To R-I-ML FOR THE 1000 EAST NATOMA REZONE TO

RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Ordinance is to rezone two adjacent parcels located at 1000 and 1010 East Natoma Street from R-I-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A- 1-A (Agricultural-Reserve District) (APN: 071-1970-003) and A-1-A (APN: 071-1970-003- 0000) to R-l-ML.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS
A. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the objectives, goals and policies of the Folsom General Plan.

B. The public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require the rezone in this case.

C. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on May 15, 2024.

D. An Environmental Impact Report was previously approved for the City of Folsom General Plan on August 28,2018, in accordance with the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has determined that no new impacts will result from the proposed project that were not already considered with the previous approval.

E. Notice of hearing before the City Council has been given in the form and in the manner required by State statute and Folsom Municipal Code.

SECTION 3. CHANGE OF ZONING MAP DESIGNATION
The ZoningMap designations for the subject parcels are hereby amended from R-1-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A-l-A (Agricultural-Reserve District), and A-1-A, to R-1-ML as set forth on Exhibit A' SECTION 4. NO MANDATORY DUTY OF CARE
This Ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care toward Ordinance No. ####
Page I of4

07/23/2024 Item No.3.
persons or propeffy within or without the City so as to provide a basis for civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in full or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 9,2024 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 23,2024.

On a motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member #,ff f':ilili*''lHT#T'Hil:i#ffi i,,h:ff ,'.Y'!lil1'"1J' AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. ####

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Exhibit A
Ordinance No. ####

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

R.'.TL
1OOO & lOlO E. Natoma Street - Rezone Exttibit
Existing Zoning Designation Proposed Zoning Designation I^egend
I A-1 A [: osc
Ic-l PD mR-l-MPD
R.l.ML
}'oL$(},\t
Ordinance No. ####

R.I{L

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENT 3
Minutes from May 15,2024 Planning Commission Meeting

07/23/2024 Item No.3.
|r()I-SO1}I

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
May 15,2024

CITY COUNGIL CHAMBERS
6:30 P.M.
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
CALL TO ORDER PLANNING GOMMISSION:

The regular Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. with Chair Eileen Reynolds presiding PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANGE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited ROLL GALL:

Commissioners Present:

Commissioners Absent
Mathew Herrera, Commissioner
DanielWest, Vice Chair
Bill Miklos, Commissioner
Bill Romanelli, Commissioner
James Ortega, Commissioner
Eileen Reynolds, Chair
Ralph Peffa, Commissioner
GITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None
MINUTES:

The minutes of the April 17 ,2024, Regular Meeting were approved as submitted

NEW BUSINESS

1. DRCL 24-00080: Shops at Folsom Ranch Pad 4 (Habit Burqer) Exterior Remodel and Determination that the Proiect is Exempt from CEQA
A public Meeting to consider a request from Josh Rupert of Hunter Properties for a modification to the approved exterior design f6r Pad 4 (Habit Burger) of The Shops at Folsom Ranch commercial center, located at 3290 East Bidwell Streel. The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site is GC (General Commercial), while the Specific Plan land use designation is SP-GC-PD (Specific Plan-General Commercial-Planned Development). The City, as lead agency, has determined that The Shops at Folsom Ranch Pad 4 project is entirely consistentwith tne folsom PtJn Arba Specific Plan (FPASP) EIR/EIS and the Addendum for the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment. As a result, the project qualifies for the streamlining provisions in Public Resources Code section Planning Commission Minutes
May 15,2024
Page I of3 Page 57
07/23/2024 Item No.3.
21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183. No further environmental review is required. (Project Planner:

Jessica Brandt / Applicant: Josh Rupert).

COMMISSIONER REYNOLDS MOVED TO APPROVE A COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEWAPPLICATION FOR MOD|F|CAT|ON TO THE EXTERTOR DESTGN FOR PAD 4 (HABIT BURGER) OF THE SHOPS AT FOLSOM RANCH COMMERCIAL CENTER AS ILLUSTRATED ON ATTACHMENT 7, BASED ON THE FINDINGS (FtND|NGS A-L) AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONS 1-6) ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.

COMMISSIONER ORTEGA SECONDED THE MOTION
AYES: HERRERA, WEST, MIKLOS, ROMANELLI, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: PENA

MOTION PASSED

2. DRCL 24-00122: Shops at Folsom Ranch Pad 3 (Starbucks) Exterior Remodeland Determination that the Proiect is Exempt from CEQA ,
A Public Meeting to consider a request from Josh Rupert of Hunter Properties for a modification to the approved exterior design for Pad 3 (Starbucks) of The Shops at Folsom Ranch commercial center, located at 3250 East Bidwell Street. The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site is GC (General Commercial), while the Specific Plan land use designation is SP-GC-PD (Specific Plan-General Commercial-Planned Development). The City, as lead agency, has determined that The Shops at Folsom Ranch Pad 3 project is entirely consistent with the Fotsom Ptan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) ElRyElS and the Addendum for the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment. As a result, the project qualifies for the streamlining provisions in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183. No further environmental review is required. (Project Planner:

Jessica Brandt / Applicant: Josh Rupert of Hunter Properties).

COMMISSIONER ROMANELLI MOVED TO APPROVE A COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEWAPPLICATION FOR MOD|F|CAT|ON TO THE EXTERTOR DESTGN FOR PAD 3 (STARBUCKS) OF THE SHOPS AT FOLSOM RANCH COMMERCIAL CENTER AS ILLUSTRATED ON ATTACHMENT 7, BASED ON THE FINDINGS (FINDINGS A-L) AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDTTTONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONS 1-6) ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.

COMMISSIONER HERRERA SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: HERRERA, WEST, MIKLOS, ROMANELLI, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: PENA

MOTION PASSED

3. ZCAM 24-00112: 1000 East Natoma Rezone to Residential and Determination that No Additional Environmental Review is Required
A Public Meeting to consider a request from David Koelpin for a Rezone to change the zoning for the parcels located at 1000 East Natoma Street (currently split zoned R-1-ML (Residential, Single-Family Dwelling, Medium Lot District) and A-1-A (Agricultural-Reserve District)) and 1010 East Natoma Street (currently zoned A-1-A), to R- 1-ML for both parcels. The City, as lead agency, has determined that no new impacts will result from the proposed project that were not already considered in the previously approved Environmental lmpact Report for the City of Folsom 2035 General Plan. The project therefore does not require additional environmental review under Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Project Planner: Jessica Brandt / Applicant: David Koelpin).

Planning Commission Minutes
May 75,2024

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

COMMISSIONER WEST MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A REZONE FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 4.3 ACRES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EAST NATOMA STREET AND FOLSOM pOrNT ROAD FROM SPL|T ZONTNG BETWEEN R-1-ML AND A-1-A (1000 EAST NATOMA), AND A-1-A (1010 EAST NATOMA), TO R-1-ML FOR BOTH PARCELS AS TLLUSTRATED ON ATTACHMENT 5 FOR THE 1000 EAST NATOMA REZONE TO RESTDENTTAL PROJECT (ZCAM24-00112) BASED ON THE FTNDtNGS (FINDTNGS A-r) ATTACHED TO THrS REPORT.

COMMISSIONER ROMANELLI SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: HERRERA, WEST, MIKLOS, ROMANELLI, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: PENA

MOTION PASSED

PLANNING COMMISSION / PLANNING MANAGER REPORT
Planning Manager, Desmond Parrington, shared the following with the Commission:
. Planning staff handled several design reviews since the Commission's last meeting on April 17 including:
o 4 custom homes
o 1 residential exterior remodel
o 1 celltower modification
o '1 commercial bank ATM
. There was an update on the Central Business District Master Plan at City Council on May 14 and an update on the River District Master Plan was presented previously to City Council on March 12. . The Community Development Department will be hosting a community meeting on Thursday, May 16 at 6:00 pm to discuss the proposed amendments to the General Plan and Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP)to increase housing capacity in Folsom as required by State law. More information is available at www.folsom.ca. us/housingstudy.
. The Commission's next meeting will be June 19 and there will be several items scheduled for that meeting.
. The Commission's July meeting will be moved from July 17 to July 24. . The July 24 meeting will be focused on the proposed amendments to the General Plan and FPASP. r There will be a special workshop on Tuesday, July 30 along with the Historic District Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission to review and discuss the draft River District Master Plan. . There will be another special meeting on August 28 to review and recommend adoption of the River District Master Plan.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom Planning Commission, Chair Eileen Reynolds adjourned the meeting al7:29 p.m.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Stephanie Hannum, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

APPROVED
Eileen Reynolds, CHAIR
Planning Commission Minutes
May 15,2024

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

ATTACHMENT 4
Vicinity Map

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

VICINITY MAP

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

This page is intenti.onallA left blonk
to facilitote double- sided printing
and minimize paper ttse.

CITY OF

DISTINCTIVE EY NATURE
FOLSO1r{

07/23/2024 Item No.3.

Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 7t23t2024
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. I1237 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power for Replacement of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Departments recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. I1237 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power for Replacement of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources Department has identified the need to purchase a new backup generator to piovide emergency power to the city's water treatment plant to replace the existing backup generator that has reached the end of its serviceable life. This atthorizalion is for the purchase and installation of a new backup generator capable of providing emergency power to the water treatment plant.

This resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power for replacement of the City of Folsom water treatment plant generator.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for gupplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $73,209 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.
1

07/23/2024 Item No.4.

ANALYSIS
The City completed the Request for Bids for the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator Replacement and publicly advertised for bids in the July 2nd, 2024 edition of the Sacramento Bee. In addition, the City provided these documents to www.ciplist.com on July 1"t,2024, which is picked up by several area builders' exchanges. The bid information was also posted on the City's website.

The Environmental and Water Resources Department received the following bids on July 16, 2024, for the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator Replacement:

The Design Build Inc.

Sierra National Construction, Inc.

Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power
$ 486,786
$ 416,800
$ 286,110
Staff has reviewed the bids submitted and has determined that Got Power Inc. DBA C D & Power is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder who meets the requirements and specifications set forth in the invitation for bids.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator replacement was included in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget. There are funds budgeted and available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) in the amount of $286,1 10 for this agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no eipansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the Cahfornia Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Qualif Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), andlor 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 11237 - A Resolution Authoridngthe City Manager to Execute an Agreement with GotPower Inc. DBA C D & Power for Replacement of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Replacement.

Submitted,
2 Marcus Yasutake, Director

07/23/2024 Item No.4.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
J Page 65
07/23/2024 Item No.4.

RESOLUTION NO. II237

A RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH GOT pOWERo INC. DBA C D & POWER FOR REPLACEMENT

OF'THE CITY OF FOLSOM WATER TREATMENT PLANT GENERATOR
WHEREAS, staff has identified the need to purchase a backup generator to provide emergency power to the water treatment plant to replace the existing backup generator that has reached the end of its serviceable life; and
WHEREAS, a Request for Bids for the backup generator was issued on July I't,2024; and WHEREAS, Got Power, Inc. DBA C D & Power submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid that met required specification for the backup generator outlined in the Bid Manual opened on July 16th,2024; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520), for this agreement in the amount of $286,110; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Got Power, Inc. DBA C D & Power for Replacement of the City of Folsom Water Treatment Plant Generator in the amount of $286,110. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 23'd day of July ,2024,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11237
Page I of I Page 66
07/23/2024 Item No.4.
r'{ : ;.:\^i
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1347 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adopting Prima Facia Speed Limits on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
State law requires local agencies to establish speed limits on public streets based on an Engineering and Traffic Study for Speed Zoning (ETS). The procedure for conducting such a study is defined in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Whenever a new roadway is opened to traffic or when traffic conditions have significantly changed on an existing roadway, then an ETS must be conducted by the local agency.

If the ETS concludes that a speed limit higher than the state minimum of 25 miles per hour (MPH) but less than the state maximum of 65 MPH is recommended, the speed limit must be adopted by City Council by ordinance, following a public hearing.

POLICY / RULE
Section 10.08.030 of the Folsom Municipal Code states that speed limits shall be established by an Engineering and Traffic Study and adopted by ordinance of the City Council. 1 MEETING DATE: 7t2312024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1347 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adopting Prima Facie Speed Limits on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway (Introduction and First Reading)
F'ROM: Public Works Department

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

ANALYSIS
Speed limits are set to establish a uniform speed that allows traffic to safely traverse a given road segment. The underlying theory is that a proper speed limit will improve traffic flow by reducing conflicts between vehicles traveling at greatly differing speeds. Artificially low limits can create safety problems (i.e., rear-end collisions, tailgating), while artificially high limits can be unsafe under typical roadway and environmental conditions. If a proper speed limit is posted, motorists who significantly exceed the posted limit are clearly unsafe compared to the general traffic flow and can be cited. Further, an ETS allows speed limits to be enforced with radar.

Speed surveys are necessary to determine speed limits in excess of the minimum speed limit of 25 MPH but less than the state maximum limit of either 55 or 65 MPH, depending on the roadway's functional classification. Certain roadways or sections of roadways have "prima facie" limits associated with them. A 'oprima facie" speed is one that does not require aradar survey, as long as the road segment in question meets specific requirements. Some examples of "prima facie" limits are as follows:
l. 25 MPH on residential streets that are less than 40 feet wide, not more than one-half mile between traffic control devices, and only one lane of traffic per direction.

2. 25 MPH in business districts, as defined by the California Vehicle Code.

3. 25 MPH when passing a senior care facility.

4. 25 MPH when passing a children's play area during times when children are typically present (usually dawn to dusk).

5. 25 MPH when passing a school while children are present, when the school is not separated from the roadway by a fence. When the school is fenced, then the 25 MPH limit only applies when children are going to or coming from school, if the roadway is used by school age pedestrians to access the campus.

6. 15 MPH in alleys.

On roadways that do not meet these criteria, an ETS must be performed to determine the proper prima facie speed. An ETS evaluates existing roadway geometric conditions, collision history, and ihe land uses adjacent to a given road segment. A radar survey is conducted to determine the 85th- percentile speed (the speed that is not exceeded by 85 percent ofvehicles surveyed), the average speed, and the 10 MPH pace (a 10 MPH range of speeds in which the majority of vehicles were traveling). The nearest 5 MPH increment to the 8Sth-percentile speed is typically deemed the appropriate speed limit, unless other conditions are present that, in the opinion of the traffic engineer, justi$ further reduction; in which case the engineer may cite a one-time, downward zoning of an additional five miles per hour.

The Public Works Department conducts speed surveys on a road-by-road basis, conducting several speed surveys along a given roadway wherever there are logical segments based on the road geometry and adjacent land use. The item before the Council currently focuses on three roadways:
2 Page 68
07/23/2024 Item No.5.

One newly created roadway, Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street to White Rock Road and two existing roadways that have recently undergone improvements which require it to be re- surveyed to establish a new 85th percentile speed; White Rock Road and Folsom Lake Crossing.

White Rock Road was redesigned in 2022 to expand the roadway from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four-lane divided roadway as part of the Capital SouthEast Connector Project. A median barrier was recently installed on Folsom Lake Crossing between East Natoma Street and Folsom Dam Road, which changed the conditions of the roadway enough to warrant a new ETS.

The recommended speed limit of 45 MPH on Folsom Lake Crossing between East Natoma Street and Folsom Dam Road would create a continuous speed limit of 45 MPH beginning at Empire Ranch Road and East Natoma Street to Folsom Lake Crossing and Dam Road. Folsom Lake Crossing from Dam Road to Folsom Auburn Road would continue to have its existing 55 MPH speed limit posted. In the future, the second phase of the Folsom Lake Crossing Median Barrier project would trigger the need to re-survey lhat section of roadway.

The results of the speed surveys conducted for these roadways are attached for your information.

The Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the recommended speed limits for Folsom Lake Crossing and Savannah Parkway at the May 23,2024 meeting and voted 6-0 to support the recommendation to establish the 45 MPH speed limit on Folsom Lake Crossing between East Natoma Street and Folsom Dam Road, and establish the 35 MPH speed limit on Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street to White Rock Road. The Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the recommended 60 MPH speed limit for White Rock Road between East Bidwell Street and Prairie City Road at the January 26,2023 meeting and approved the recommendation unanimously 5-0. A copy of each Action Summary from that meeting is attached.

This is the introduction and first reading of the ordinance

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
This item has no impact on the City's General Fund.

AL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 1347 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Adopting Prima Facie Speed Limits on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway

2. Action Summaries of the January 26,2023 and the May 23,2024Trafftc Safety Committee Meetings
J Page 69
07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
4 Page 70
07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Attachment I
Ordinance No. 1347

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

ORDINANCE NO. 1347

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM ADOPTING PRIMA

FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON FOLSOM LAKE CROSSINGO WHITE ROCK ROAD, AND

SAVANNAH PARKWAY
The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. PURPOSE
State law requires that local agencies establish speed limits on public streets within their jurisdictions using uiteria defined in the California Vehicle Code; and No previous adoption of speed limits on Savannah Parkway exists in the City of Folsom; and
White Rock Road and Folsom Lake Crossing have had significant roadway improvements completed since their last valid Engineering and Traffic Study performed; and,
The Public Works Department has conducted valid Engineering and Traffic Studies for speed zoning to determine prima facie speeds on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway; and
The proposed speed limits were reviewed and approved by the Traffic Safety Committee on January 26,2023 for White Rock Road and May 23,2024 for Folsom Lake Crossing and Savannah Parkway; and
Notice of hearing has been given in the form and in the manner required by State law and the Folsom Municipal Code.

SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
The Prima Facie speed limits on Folsom Lake Crossing, White Rock Road, and Savannah Parkway are summarized as set forth on Exhibit A.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the factthal any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. EF'FECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in full or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

Ordinance No. 1347
Page I of7
F

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 23,2024 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on August 27,2024.

On a motion by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember
of the City of Folsom, State
vote:
the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of California, this 27th day of August 2024 by the following roll-call AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1347
Page2 of7 Page 73
07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Exhibit A

CHART OF RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS
Ordinance No. 1347

07/23/2024 Item No.5.
76%
s7%
86%44-53
31-40
55-64

35.6 51.6

47.651.6

39.3 56.3
45*
35*
50*
Not
Posted
Not
Posted
55 White Rock Road between Prairie
City Road and East Bidwell Street
Folsom Lake Crossing between East
Natoma St and Folsom Dam Rd
Savannah Parkway between East
Bidwell St and White Rock Rd
Existing
Speed
Lirnit
{mph)
Recornmended
Speed Limit
{mph)
8s%
Speed
imph)
Median
Speed
(mph)
10 mph
Pace Range
(mph)
Street Segment
% of Veh.
ln Pace
Table 2 - Speed Survey Recommendations
Note:
* 5 MPH reduction applied. Refer to Speed Survey Worksheet for summary of roadway conditions in support of reduction.

Ordinance No. 1347

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

City of Folsom - Folsom Lake Crossing & Savannah Parkway - Speed Surveys

NOT TO SCALE
Figure 1
Folsom Lake Crossing VicinitY MaP
Project Segment
Existing Posted Speed Limit:55 MPH
Recommended Speed Limit 45 MPH
Ordinance No. 1347KimleyDHorn Pqco 5 of7

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Gity of Folsom - Folsom Lake Crossing & Savannah Parkway - Speed Surveys

NOT TO SCALE
Figure 2
Savannah Pafuway Vicinity MaP
Project Segment
-
Existing Posted Speed Limit: N/A
Recommended Speed Limit:35 MPH
Kimley D HOf n ordinance No. 1347
A ^€1

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

City of Folsom - White Rock Road - Speed Survey

NOT TO SCALE
Figure 3
lilhite Rock Road Vicinity Map
r Project Segment
Existing Posted Speed Limit: N/A
Recommended Speed Limit 60 MPH
Ordinance No. 1347
PageT of1Kimley>)Horn Page 78
07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Attachment 2
Action Summaries
Traffrc Safety Committee Meetings
January 26,2023, and May 23,2024

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

City of Folsorn

TRAF'F'IC SAFETY COMMITTEE

MEETING MINUTES
4:00 p.m., Thursday, January 26,2023

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 4:05 pm

2. ROLL CALL:

Bailey, Bosch, Brausch, Galovich, Goddard, McGee, Washburn

Present: Bailey, Bosch, Brausch, Galovich, Goddard Absent: McGee, Washburn

3. APPROVE ACTION SUMMARY
Action Summary of the October 27th,2022, and Dec 8th,2022 meeting will stand approved unless any Committee member requests a revision.

Bailey moved and Bosch seconded, committee uqanimous that both stand approved.

4. BUSINESS FROM FLOOR/GOOD OF THE ORDER
Discuss any items not on the agenda that a member of the public wishes to bring to the Committee's attention. The Committee cannot take formal action on the item but can request that it be placed on a future agenda for further discussion if necessary.

Daren Sandusky, a Folsom Ranch resident, requested that in the future a 3 way stop sign be considered at the intersection of East Bidwell and Old Ranch Way.

5. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
Administrative Business
a. Oath of Office for At-Large Representatives
Zach Bosch administered the Oath to all At-Large representatives and the documents were properly signed.
b. Selection of Chair/Vice Chair
Brausch moved and Goddard seconded, committee unanimous that Scott Bailey be selected as Chair. Brausch moved and Bosch seconded, committee unanimous that Kevin Goddard be selected as Vice Chair.
c. Meeting Schedule for2023 and2024
Bailey moved and Goddard seconded, committee unanimous. Committee voted to maintain a monthly schedule (on an as-needed basis) on the fourth Thursday of those months, at 4:00 pm.

Neighborhood Issues
d. Parkshore Drive RRFB request
Goddard moved and Bausch seconded, committee unanimous. Committee approves Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at both crosswalks on Parkshore Drive.

Minutes.Jan.26

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Action Items
e. Speed Limit on White Rock Road between East Bidwell and Prairie City Road Brausch moved and Goddard seconded, committee unanimous. The Committee recommends a posted speed limit of 60 MPH on White Rock Road between East Bidwell and Prairie City Road.

6. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. Retention of Traffic Safety Committee Records
o Bosch presented the City's newly approved retention schedule that requires the retention of Committee audio recordings of meetings for 2 years. r Committee informally discussed Folsom Lake Crossing and East Natoma barriers. Bailey asked Bosch for cost estimate information for this project to be provided at the February TSC meeting if Possible.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 5:30 pm
Minutes.Jan.26

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Traffic Safety Committee Meeting
Meeting Minutes
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 May 23,2024
4:00 PMcr?Y ot
r.(}LS()M

2. 1 CALL TO ORDER
Committee Member Goddard called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: S. Bailey, Z. Bosch, J. Brausch, T. Galovich, K. Goddard, C. Wilson, M' Washburn
ABSENT: M. McGee

3. MINUTES
Approval of the Minutes of the April4,2024,Regular Meeting.

Goddard motioned to accept the minutes.

Brausch seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bosch, Brausch, Galovich, Goddard
ABSTAN: Bailey, Washburn
ABSENT: McGee

BUSTNESS FROM,THE FLOOWGOOTI OF THE ORDER
None

ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
NOTE: 4:26 p.m; Sargent Galovich asked to be excused as he was called to an accident scene Five Committee Members remained.

Neighborhood Issues
a. Speed Limit Adoptions for Folsom Lake Crossing & Savannah Parkway Member Bosch presented the Kimley Horn speed study data and recommendations for these segments. The Traffic Safety Committee recommends the adoption of these speed limits:
45 MPH on the Folsom Lake Crossing segment between East Natoma Street and Folsom Dam Roadd and 35 MPH the entire length of Savannah Parkway (East Bidwell Street to White Rock Road).

4. 5.
1

07/23/2024 Item No.5.
6 Brausch proposed the motion.

Goddard seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bosch, Brausch, Bailey, Goddard, Washburn
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: McGee, Galovich
b. Folsom Boulevard Bike Ped Overcrossing Preferred Alternative Grant Application Brett Bollinger, Senior Trails Planner with the Parks and Recreation Department, presented information on this topic and concluded with a request that we give direction that it be submiued for grant consideration.

The Traffic Safety Committee recommends that the Folsom Boulevard Bike Pedesffian Overcrossing Project be submitted for consideration in the Active Transportation Cycle 7 round for both the statewide and regional programs.

Brausch proposed the motion.

Washburn seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bosch, Brausch, Goddard, Bailey, Washburn
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: McGee, Galovich

INFORMATIONAI ITEMS
a. FAQ's for CityiTraffic Safety Committee Website
Member Brausch created the discussed and proposed FAQs.

During the discussion, Chairman Bailey suggested some additions relative to school areas (buses, hug and go, etc.). Member Brausch will discuss these further with Member Washburn and develop that section further.

Member Brausch recognized a need to add scooters/e-bike section and she will further develop this section.

Generally, this document seems valuable and the Traffic Safety Committee recommends it be put into use as soon as it is updated/revised to include the above suggested additional information.
1

07/23/2024 Item No.5.
7 Bailey proposed the motion.

Bosch seconded the motion.

Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Bosch, Brausch, Bailey, Goddard, Washbum
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: McGee, Galovich
NOTE: At 4:44 p.m.; Matt Washburn asked to be excused as he needed to attend Folsom High School graduation ceremonies.
b. Project Update for Folsom Lake Crossing Median Barrier Phase 2 Member Bosch informed the committee that Caltrans is awaiting Federal release of the appropriations. Once released, they will flow quickly to the City of Folsom, and the project will get underway. Member Bosch anticipates it will be a one-year project.

Member Brausch asked that, during the official design phase of the project, a conversation take place regarding the collision activity in the Gun Range Road area, with consideration being given to potentially closing off the turn lanes in the middle of this segment so the barrier can be continuous/solid all the way through.
c. Traffic Safety Committee Action Item Updates
Member Bosch reported that most of the back-ordered items are in or due in and that many of our outstanding items will be cleared very soon.

Member Brausch asked for a quick Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) update. Member Bosch informed the committee that Kimley-Horn is in the process of developing the data for the update of this document. Member Brausch requested a discussion regarding the status/completion of the 2019 priorities as the 2024/25 priorities are developed. Member Bosch stated that staff has identified Folsom Boulevard, City limit Folsom/Auburn Road through to Highway 50 as a priority for improvements. Others suggested Blue Ravine Road and East Bidwell Steet. All will be discussed in the creation of the updated LRSP, which is needed before Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) applications are due in September. d. Upcoming Traffic Safety Committee Items
No right turn on red at Scott Street and Riley Street is still to be a future agenda item.

The next meeting is on June 27,2024.

ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjoumed at 5:09 p.m.
1

07/23/2024 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends, that the City Council review the attached Report of utilities delinquencies, hold a public hearing on the Report and accept any oral or written public comment, and adopt Resolution No. 1 1232 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect such Charges on the Tax Roll.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City provides various utilities services to properties throughout the City, including sewer, water, and solid waste services, for which the City charges a fee for service. While most accounts within the City are current, there are some delinquent utilities accounts. A Delinquent Utilities Charge Report ("Report") speciffing the delinquency by parcel number and type of property is attached showing delinquencies totaling 5277,654.00.

Following notice and apublic hearing, the City Council may pass a resolution,by at least a two-thirds vote, requesting that the County Auditor/Tax Collector transfer the City's delinquent utilities charges to the property tax roll for collection with property taxes. Staff recommends the City Council consider the attached Report, hold a public hearing, and accept public comments on this matter, and authorize transfer of any delinquent utilities' charges to the County for collection on the property tax roll.
1 MEETING DATE: 712312024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT ResolutionNo. 11232 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of
Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect Such Charges on the Tax Roll
FROM: Finance Department

07/23/2024 Item No.6.

Despite some delinquencies, the City has had remarkable success in utility collections. Utility billing collections average $54,533,397 annually. These collections include water, city sewer, and solid waste services, for a current total of 27,200 open municipal utility accounts. The delinquent amount of $277,654.00 is less than 1% of our annual collections.

POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code and state law provide that, following notice and a public hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution transferring delinquent utilities charges to the County tax ro11 for collection with property taxes. (Cal. Gov't Code 25831,38790.1; Cal. Health and Safety Code g$ 5470 et seq.; Folsom Municipal Code Chapters 3.20 (collection of municipal service charges generally) 13.12 (collection of sewer charges). The resolution authorizing the transfer must be passed by the City Council by a two-thirds vote. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473).

ANALYSIS
The City provides sewer, water, and solid waste services to properties within the City, for which it charges the users. While the vast majority of accounts throughout the City are current, there are some accounts that are more than 60 days delinquent in payment and appropriate for transfer to the County tax roll for collection. The total amount of these eligible delinquent accounts is 5277,654.00 as indicated on the attached Report. The Report captures accounts that were noticed with a delinquent amount of $150 or greater. The last time a request was made to transfer delinquent utilities to the tax roll was July of 2023.

State law authorizes the City Council, by resolution adopted by at least a two-thirds vote, to request that the County Auditor/Tax Collector transfer these delinquent amounts to the property tax roll for collection with general property taxes. Prior notice of the hearing is to be mailed to the property owners not less than ten days before the hearing. (Cal. Gov't Code $$ 33790.1 ,25831). Notice is also to be published in a newspaper of general circulation for two consecutive weeks prior to the hearing. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473.1; Cal. Gov't Code $ 6066). City staff has satisfied these notice requirements by mailing notice to affected property owners on June 20,2024. A public hearing notice was published in the Folsom Telegraph on July 5,2024, and July 12,2024.

Following a public hearing, the City Council has discretion to adopt the Report as presented, modift the Report, or decline to adopt the Report. However, if the City Council finds that valid protests are made by the owners of a majority of separate parcels of property described in the Report, the Council may not adopt the Report and may not transfer the delinquencies to the tax roll. (Cal. Health & Safety Code $ 5473.2). Upon passage of the resolution confirming the Report of delinquencies, as presented, or modified, the Revenue Division will transmit the Report to the Auditor/Tax Collector for placement of the charges on the tax rolls 2 Page 86
07/23/2024 Item No.6.
for collection with property taxes. County staff has advised City staff that in order to have the matters placed on the tax roll for this year, the Report must be transmitted to the County no later thanAugast 2,2024.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
The City currently has $277 ,654.00 in delinquent charges thal are appropriate for transfer to the tax rolls. Approving this item and authorizing the transfer will help toward collection of these amounts. Should the County accept these amounts, the City will receive payment directly from the County for these amounts and the County will pursue collection through the tax rolls.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and does not require environmental review.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 1 1232 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving and Confirming the Report of Delinquent Utilities Charges and Requesting Sacramento County to Collect such Charges on the Tax Roll Submitted,
Stacey Tamagni, CPA
Director of Finance
J Page 87
07/23/2024 Item No.6.

RESOLUTION NO. 11232

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF F'OLSOM APPROVING

AND CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF'DELINQUENT UTILITIES CHARGES AND

REQUESTING SACRAMENTO COUNTY TO COLLECT SUCH CHARGES ON THE

TAX ROLL
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom (the "City") provides certain solid waste, water, and sewer services to its residents and occupants; and
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 2583I and 38790.1, California Health and Safety Code sections 5473 et seq. and Chapters 3.20 and 13.I2 of the Folsom Municipal Code authorize the City to have the delinquent charges for the above services (the "Charges") collected on the tax roll by Sacramento County on the relevant parcels; and
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared a Delinquent Utilities Charges Report (the "Report") identiffing the delinquent charges by Assessor's Parcel Nurnber; and WHEREAS, a hearing was held on JuIy 23,2024, at which the City Council reviewed and considered the Report and any protests related thereto, with prior notice of the hearing being provided as required by law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom:

1. Findings. In reviewing and considering the delinquent Charges and the Report, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:
a. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least once a week for two consecutive weeks prior to the City Council public hearing, and notice was mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to each affected properfy owners at addresses as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll or as known to the City; and,
b. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council included the date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, and a general explanation of the matter to be considered; and,
c. Upon considering all objections and protests received at the time of the hearing on this matter, the City Council finds that protest by owners of a majority of the parcels of property described in the Report does not exist.

2. Confirming the Report. The City Council hereby approves, confirms, and adopts the Report, as directed and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and determines that the Charges are proper and correct. The City Council directs the Finance Director to make any amendments to the Report as were directed by the City Council and as necessary to remove ResolutionNo. 11232
Page I of9

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
parcels from the Report for which payment has been made before transfer of the amounts to Sacramento County for collection on the tax ro11, subject to the same penalties, procedure, and sale in case of delinquency as provided for those taxes.

3. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Finance Director to deliver a certified copy of the finalized Report to the Sacramento County Department of Finance - Auditor Division and to submit a certified copy of this Resolution and Report to the County Recorder for recordation.

4. Services of Sacramento Countv. The Offices of the Sacramento County Department of Finance - Auditor Division is requested for the placement of the Charges on the Annual Secured property tax roll with the Ad Valorem taxes.

5. General Authorization. The City Manager, City Finance Director, City Clerk, City Attorney and the other officers and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed, individually and collectively, to do any and all things and to execute, deliver, and perform any and all agreements and documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the City thal arc in conformity with the purposes and intent of this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 23'd day of July 2024,by the following roll call vote:

6. AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11232
Page2 of9

07/23/2024 Item No.6.

City of Folsom Delinquent Utilities Charge Report
as of 7123/2024
APN Amount
070-0166-009-0000 $ 22,498.00
07r-0020-1 1 1-0000 $ 10,420.00
070-0105-01 1-0000 $ 8,152.00
07 0-0203-01 8-0000 $ 3,023.00
072-0970-018-0000 $ 2,689.00
227-02t1-012-0000 $ 2,526.00
07 r-0020- 1 03-0000 $ 2,485.00
072-t2r0-039-0000 $ 2,449.00
227-0520-007-0000 $ 2,444.00
07z-rs50-010-0000 s 2,426.00
072-2010-038-0000 $ 2,346.00
213-0580-013-0000 $ 2,283.00
07t-1460-017-0000 $ 2,255.00
2r3-0590-016-0000 $ 2,181.00
072-1370-024-0000 $ 2,173.00
07t-1200-029-0000 $ 2,169.00
070-0 116-022-0000 $ 2,144.00
072-2410-037-0000 $ 2,128.00
072-t730-005-0000 $ 2,109.00
07 r-07 60-023-0000 $ 2,107.00
072-0750-017-0000 s 2,101.00
07t-0470-006-0000 $ 2,098.00
07r-2060-013-0000 $ 2,066.00
071-0700-047-0000 $ 2,058.00
072-0870-028-0000 $ 2,051.00
070-0r20-002-0000 $ 2,043.00
072-r0s0-050-0000 $ 2,038.00
072-2780-063-0000 $ 2,037.00
071-0930-057-0000 $ 2,035.00
07t-r440-069-0000 s 2,027.00
072-0940-021-0000 s 2,010.00
071-0600-014-0000 $ 1,998.00
072-3710-025-0000 $ 1,981.00
072-0740-013-0000 $ 1,972.00
072-t040-054-0000 $ 1,972.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
070-0193-004-0000 $ l,97l.oo
072-3870-070-0000 $ 1,959.00
07r-0231-003-0000 $ 1,954.00
072-r8 10-001-0000 $ 1,900.00
072-2930-1 55-0000 $ 1,883.00
072-0890-031-0000 $ 1,876.00
072-3780-025-0000 $ r,872.00
071-0510-044-0000 $ 1,869.00
07t-0290-034-0000 $ 1,866.00
070-0146-003-0000 $ 1,854.00
071-1030-027-0000 $ 1,841.00
07r-0660-060-0000 $ 1,820.00
07 r-0t72-01 1-0000 s 1,816.00
07r-0410-013-0000 $ 1,797.00
072-1380-045-0000 $ 1,795.00
071-0460-020-0000 $ 1,791.00
071-0950-053-0000 $ 1,782.00
072-0940-046-0000 $ 1,782.00
072-3530-034-0000 s r,769.00
07z-ts60-013-0000 $ r,759.00
071-0101-005-0000 $ 1,759.00
072-1740-024-0000 $ 7,752.00
071-0770-020-0000 $ 1,747.00
072-1620-064-0000 $ 1,735.00
070-0154-014-0000 $ 7,717.00
2t3-0071-032-0000 $ r,7r4.00
070-0103-01 1-0000 $ 1,698.00
072-3770-024-0000 s 1,653.00
2t3-0283-027-0000 $ r,652.00
072-t390-050-0000 $ 1,640.00
072-r780-006-0000 s 1,638.00
072-3490-008-0000 $ 1,601.00
2r3-0630-004-0000 $ 1,583.00
072-38t0-094-0000 $ 1,560.00
071-0154-001-0000 $ 1,559.00
227 -0420-006-0000 $ 1,540.00
070-0155-006-0000 s 1,540.00
07l-1840-007 -0026 $ r,537.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
07 t-t840-008-0009 $ 1,508.00
071-03s0-074-0000 $ 1,468.00
072-r 140-021-0000 $ 1,43 1.00
072-r760-003-0000 $ 1,413.00
227 -0600-009-0000 $ 1,408.00
227-0540-003-0000 $ 1,408.00
07r-0243-042-0000 $ 1,388.00
071-0780-033-0000 $ 1,300.00
07r-t810-014-0052 $ 1,297.00
071-r810-049-0037 s 1,297.00
071-0800-034-0000 $ 1,268.00
072-t290-046-0000 $ 1,243.00
072-t000-025-0000 $ 1,221.00
072-2330-037-0000 $ r,2o2.oo
07t-t470-027-0000 $ 1,179.00
072-3580-023-0000 $ 1,178.00
072-2830-007-0036 s 1,165.00
071-0780-01 8-0000 $ 1,156.00
072-3650-041-0000 $ 1,149.00
227 -0330-026-0000 $ 1,129.00
072-3760-066-0000 $ 1,125.00
072-0940-079-0000 $ 001,111
072-3530-018-0000 s 1,103.00
072-3850-005-0000 $ 1,099.00
072-r 160-082-0000 $ 1,098.00
072-3650-047-0000 $ I,083.00
072-2780-068-0002 $ 1,080.00
223-0560-001-0000 $ 1,058.00
072-2250-003-0000 $ 1,047.00
227-0320-035-0000 $ 999.00
07r-0r73-002-0000 $ 989.00
07 t-r880-007-0000 s 988.00
072-2790-008-0005 $ 986.00
072-3170-019-0000 $ 984.00
07r-r810-010-0030 $ 982.00
07 t-t840-007 -0023 $ 974.00
07 t-r800-021-0000 $ 956.00
072-2830-004-0029 s 9s4.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
071-1300-046-0000 $ 9s2.00
223-0500-034-0000 $ 92s.00
072-0700-007-0000 $ 918.00
072-3630-015-0000 $ 91s.00
072-2830-005-0025 $ 913.00
072-r880-042-0000 $ 896.00
07t-0214-007-0000 $ 890.00
071-0190-071-0000 $ 889.00
072-r9t0-030-0000 $ 875.00
072-0780-044-0000 s 872.00
072-38r0-054-0000 $ 843.00
227-0550-012-0000 $ 829.00
072-3280-024-0000 $ 824.00
072-3700-050-0000 $ 816.00
072-2280-016-0000 $ 815.00
072-3600-032-0000 $ 800.00
07t-0152-010-0000 s 774.00
072-2030-077-0000 $ 77t.00
071-0083-002-0000 $ 766.00
07r-1280-048-0000 $ 76r.00
227 -0480-056-0000 s 737.00
071-0530 -022-0000 s 730.00
072-3600-037-0000 $ 727.00
072-0940-098-0000 s 716.00
072-r880-013-0000 $ 716.00
071-0232-014-0000 $ 711.00
213-0820-023-0000 $ 710.00
072-4220-075-0000 $ 709.00
072-0720-0s8-0000 $ 702.00
07t-0750-039-0000 $ 694.00
072-2830-008-0018 $ 691.00
07r-0470-010-0000 $ 688.00
07r-0290-029-0000 $ 687.00
072-0870-018-0000 $ 686.00
072-2030-058-0000 $ 665.00
072-2030-078-0000 s 662.00
072-3760-022-0000 $ 6s6.00
072-2450-004-0000 $ 6s5.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
071-0820-01 1-0000 $ 6s3.00
071-03s0-037-0000 $ 6s2.00
07r-r1 10-003-0000 $ 623.00
07r-02t2-003-0000 $ 616.00
072-2150-035-0000 $ 602.00
072-4000-069-0000 $ s81.00
072-r090-005-0000 $ s70.00
227-0230-003-0000 $ ss9.00
07 t-t590-040-0000 s s44.00
227-0s80-081-0000 $ s2r.00
070-0111-014-0000 $ s 16.00
072-t 100-03 1-0000 s 503.00
072-1250-089-0000 $ 502.00
072-3790-009-0000 $ 498.00
2r3-0960-007-0000 $ 493.00
072-3660-071-0000 $ 476.00
070-0210-028-0000 s 468.00
072-2040-009-0000 $ 464.00
072-t290-007-0000 $ 448.00
072-3860-059-0000 $ 447.00
07r-02t2-001-0000 $ 440.00
071-0300-053-0000 $ 437.00
072-1040-061-0000 $ 429.00
2r3-0760-032-0000 $ 392.00
227-0s60-019-0000 $ 374.00
227-0390-097-0000 $ 374.00
07r-t920-035-0000 $ 363.00
072-2280-033-0000 $ 362.00
072-3660-040-0000 $ 355.00
072-r 150-077-0000 s 340.00
072-1740-014-0000 s 339.00
072-2710-028-0000 s 329.00
072-3470-029-0000 s 309.00
072-2340-008-0000 $ 307.00
072-3330-026-0000 $ 30s.00
07 t-t520-076-0000 $ 298.00
07t-r490-001-0000 $ 298.00
07 t-1680-041-0000 $ 294.00
ResolutionNo. 11232
PageT of9

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
07 I-1420-024-0000 $ 288.00
07 t-r440-019-0000 $ 288.00
072-3270-034-0000 $ 281.00
072-2030-035-0000 $ 263.00
072-0700-035-0000 $ 262.00
07t-t840-007-0003 $ 26r.00
071-0091-008-0000 $ 2s6.00
072-t430-049-0000 $ 2s2.00
072-t770-043-0000 $ 2s0.00
072-3150-026-0000 $ 246.00
07r-r870-060-0000 $ 246.00
072-3180-037-0000 $ 24s.00
072-3670-010-0000 $ 240.00
213-0800-015-0000 $ 237.00
072-3650-032-0000 $ 229.00
071-1730-003-0000 $ 226.00
071-0480-009-0000 $ 226.00
07 r-r8 1 0-006-0004 $ 218.00
07 t-0290-006-0000 $ 20s.00
072-2510-01 5-0000 $ 201.00
072-3740-004-0000 $ 199.00
07r-0252-007-0000 $ 18s.00
072-3030-012-0000 $ 179.00
072-I 100-002-0000 $ 169.00
072-t 140-051-0000 $ t67.00
072-3660-01 1-0000 $ 163.00
07t-0450-039-0000 $ 161.00
072-t250-061-0000 $ 1s9.00
072-4020-0 1 7-0000 $ 159.00
072-3850-051-0000 $ 1s8.00
071-0810-057-0000 s 1s8,00
227-0230-035-0000 s 1s8.00
07r-t 100-030-0000 $ 1s6.00
072-4100-065-0000 $ 1s6.00
072-3490-028-0000 s 15s.00
072-r490-036-0000 $ 1s3.00
07 r-t220-014-0000 $ 153.00
07 r-r500-007-0000 $ 153.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.
072-2030-057-0000 $ ls 1.00
071-0390-013-0000 $ 126.00
072-2660-034-0000 $ 124.00
072-2660-023-0000 $ 122.00
223-0560-002-0000 $ 104.00
ResolutionNo. 11232

07/23/2024 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 7t2312024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 1 1233 * A Resolution Amending Resolution No. lII72 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement,
Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees
FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff requests the City Council adopt Resolution No. 11233 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. I ll72 andApproving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and fight Rail lmpact Fees.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In May 2006,the City Council adopted ResolutionNo. 7812 which established new city impact and connection fees for law enforcement, fire suppression, general facilities, vehicles and equipment, park improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, housing trust, water, sanitary sewer, transportation improvement, drainage, and light rail. Resolution No. 7812 also approved an annual infl ationary adj ustment.

I

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code
The Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows . Section 03.20.045 - Solid Waste Fee
. Section 03.80.040 - Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement . Section 03.90.010 - Housing Trust Fee
. Section 04.10.010 - Park Improvement
. Section 04.12.010 - Humbug-Willow Creek Fee
. Section 10.50.040 - Light Rail
. Section 12.04.060 - Transportation Improvement
. Section 13.24.050 - Water Connection
. Section 13.25.010 - Sewer Connection
. Section 13.30.010 - Water Impact Fee
. Section 17.95.010 - Drainage Improvement

ANALYSIS
In accordance with Resolution No. 7812, adopted May 23,2006, Staff has calculated proposed fee schedules to be effective September 21,2024. The annual inflationary adjustment to be applied is 2.70%. This percentage adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 2023. The proposed fee schedules were derived by applying the annual inflationary adjustment to the current fee.

Government Code section 66018 requires a public hearing for certain fee increases.

Government Code section660l7 states fees may be effective no sooner than 60 days following the adoption of the increase in the fee or charge.

The proposed September 21,2024, fee schedules are included in Resolution No. 11233 as Attachment I and the Construction Cost Index obtained from the Engineering News Record is included as Attachmerrt 2.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. I 1233 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. lll72 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail lmpact Fees.

2. Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index
2 tted,

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director
J Page 99
07/23/2024 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 1

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

RESOLUTION NO. II233
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 11172 AND APPROVING THE

UPDATED CITY IMPACT AND CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE FOR LAW

ENF'ORCEMENTO F'IRE SUPPRESSION, GENERAL F'ACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT,' PARI( IMPROVEMENT, HUMBUG.WILLOW CREEK, HOUSING

TRUST, WATER, SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, TRANSPORTATION

IMPROVEMENTO DRAINAGE' AND LIGHT RAIL IMPACT F'EES
WHEREAS' the Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows:
1). Section 03.20.045 - Solid Waste Fee
2). Section 03.80.040 - Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement 3). Section 03.90.010 - Housing Trust Fee
4). Section 04.10.010 - Park Improvement
5). Section 04.12.010 - Humbug-Willow Creek
6). Section 10.50.040 - Light Rail
7). Section 12.04.060 - Transportation Improvement
8). Section t3.24.050 - Water Connection
9). Section 13.25.010 - Sewer Connection
10). Section 13.30.010 - Water Impact Fee
1l). Section 17.95.010 - Drainage Improvement; and
WHEREAS, ResolutionNo. 7812 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 23,2006, allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to selected City Impact and Connection fees each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on July 23,2024, held a public hearing on the proposed fee updates and considered public comment; and
WHEREAS' the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 2023 and the a4nual adjustment to be applied is2.70Yo; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and City Code; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom amends ResolutionNo 11 172 andapproves the updated City Impact and Connection Fees as of September 21, 2024 for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail lmpact Fees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23'd day of July 2024,by the following roll-call vote:

Resolution No. 11233
Page I of6 Page 101
07/23/2024 Item No.7.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
ResolutionNo. 11233
Page2 of6 Page 102
07/23/2024 Item No.7.

CltJ' af Folrorn
Inrprct nnd fonnsctlon F're Ecbedule A; nf $rptemhr ll' l0ld Fallm (FlllC l.Elt"0l[f
5!iSl sFamjlv H.csinlcntiul
Rr'cidcndul
ll-odging
I ttr:lr,rlugunmt
Iilr"tr:lrrpncnt
Flrs f FIhIC !,llll.0tlll
Fnnrily R*uidcntiul
&tridr'ndul
tlwcllings
[*dging
Dertlagrnenl
t}-t+r'[ogrndnt
6*npml Fucllltlqr {F*l(' .}'f;['0!01
FunnjlJ'Residcntiul
Ecciduntiill
Dwrllingr
I [-odging
Dcn'i]l,tr5rantnt
I tk+rlopnr'nt
ff'sncrrl Frrk F,ouh (flllC !'fi1.O!{ll
Funrily Rcsidrnliul
ulti-tiumily Rtridcnti$l
Ilwrllings
D*ltlopanmt
Dcrrlqrrrrlrl
llrulneu lFIlt( l?.9S.1!"Sl
Fumily llcsidcntiul
ulti-F"amily ltcsidr.'ntinl
tlvrtllin6;s
llcwlofxncnu,t)ffnr
lnd ustria I ftcw l,r: 5rncrr t
Llaht ltrl lnlnsei Fs[ {F*lC l0.!{l$,101
Frrndly Rrsiilentirl
R.sidrrrtirl
lc tlqrcllingF
Unit
Unit
Unit
t!3
tr5
315
[.Jnit
Llnit
[-tnit
[-lnit
$q. Ft.

Sq. Ft.
[.Jnit
[Jnit
Unit
i-lni,t
5q- Ft.
$q- Fl.
lJnit
t-lnit
unit
Unit
5q" Ft.

Sq" Ft.

Unit
[-lnit
tr-lni,t
Sq. Ft.
$q. lit.
5??
5t
3t. t
$$
s5
g!
ssll-1
50'fl1
$l;1
3l:
slJ
30"{t3
EU..CIl
t!
g5
lr
!$.rlu!
l0.i!0t
$]:
$t!
$-11
519i
$l9J
s!"
f,!"nt
5 SN
g!
lr
tr
, tYl
.l.lfi
5{!"7}
3tr.3t
gt.r*! I
tr.$t I
I t,$01
sfsll
t.:6
$$.
$
$
s
s
3I
t1
f t"r{5!
5l
5l
TI
$r
$0.tt:l
to-$]l
st. t
fi,I
st, I
5?,1
!7, r
s{r! I
55S5
35$5
55I
$CI"ft:!
$0"01[
LJnit
Unit
Unit
,,1cn'
Acru
$t
$[
CI
s?
t?
Resolution No. I1233

gislllTl
F"EE
,m,lll/!ll!{
,,lnns.*l
tuflrtlnr
,ldiurlmrrl
UEI .$rqrl
(fll Frryml
FF;I:
t/lNll{ll{I'EE IDESERIPTI{TFi SAfiI$

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

CltX,of Folmm
Inrprst rnd Cooswilon Fs€ $chedule A* of $tptcmber 21, l$l{ fJtrr: hrprren t,t) llice
Ilc'*r:lupanwrt
-I'rrnsmdrtlon lrnnmv ]'ts t FSI f I l.ll.l.$tff I
Fnnrily Rtrii&'ntiul
$q- Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Rrsidcntinrl
k thxllingp
lndustriali{r{lir,.c
Lrnd Urer
Trip f,hnrncrriul
$taliun:i'
per fueling rtnlimu
ll'rtlr lmqct l'rct {Flllf lfJ0,0l0l
Fanrily ltcridcntinl
Rr*idrrrdul
lTsler lConnsctlofl Fs[6 fFsr'c !i.t4.otol
Funrily Residcntinl
Rcsidrrrtiul
tlitls
llorn
" nrt{er
l" [rutr'"F
I l,"]* ntr.'ttr
IuctL'r
mctr'r
nutcr
mctcr
rilrtcr
I$'" rnclcr
lfrnsr Coonarthn Fcdr [F*l( l,]l.llJll0]
Family ftcridcntiul
Rcgidrntirl
I Iitlr
llonx
- ml'lcr
tr" nretr.'r
Unit
t-lnil
Unit
Sq Fl-
Srt ft"
Sq ri"
Sq Ft.

Sq ft.

Unit
Unil
Acrc
rlrrc
Unit
Unit
Unit
tr-lnit
Unit
[-lnit
Unit
Unit
Resolution No. I1233

s0.f$0
50"10n
s9,165"?J
ss.4s5"?0
5S,+S 5"?f
sr3,fl
5{!.0.1
5ti.0.l
155.1r
$ r t.lri I
5t" r t?
5dfl:

51.5S.1
ll.5$q
sl,{i I }
gr,4?fl
it.td !
s1.47[l
il.{r0J
5-t"4l{.
$ffi.$?.
s10.1{li
srlft,T{i
$9.1.9.1:
5t lts.$s.
sJo4.{E?
5417,4](
st,3t?
5$53
$g"il
fl.tl?t
lt.f l'
sr-l[]
c0.so?

50.0i01
$:5{r.17
$!15"tr:
$t75-t:
5fl-3fi
50"!n

50.1n
5 X "-t9
5-1$l
tltl
3tf
f4r
*{r
tfi
sdT
$d.f
i.s?
5 ! toi
slSn
55ll
5fi10
st.f}lCI
Sl.-5o-r

15. l:9
gfl.:0t
$! l.*t r
$3J
f:f
sl(
t1(
tr]
$35
t0.t6?
sfl.t I r
$u.515-$0
sh,Fns.+l$
5h,r[$il.$n
$t{.:r
t6.:l
ln.f I
s5fr.?{
5 t t"TI5
st.t4$
$fllI
lx.54I
I 1.s;lJ
s3.*t{
tt,54J
tr.4l:
s].54:
31"9i*
st"?.lt
3lt".l{tr
5J I.I$:
5$:,31{:
s$?,5$(
lt$s,thi:
gI t:,!r{
g+r9-tq{
s r.:5{
!s?:
s97:
st.lft:
$1.:5{
sl,l5,l

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

Clty o[ FuNrnm
Impact und Cnnnsctlnn Fsr Scbadult Ar o[ $nptrmh+r ll, I01"il s:.{l
g.r.

I l.if" nrcRl
mctcr
metcr
ntcldr
nrctrI
mel0r
!$'" rnclcr
,Solld ll'rilc Croltrl Nmprp'tqmrtrt JbG {Falt: !,tftit+5t Fanrily Rcr;idrnlirl
lLrnxg
lllulll Frmlly
lard ilumptcr
yrrd iluryrstrr
1rd tlumptcr
lard durnp;ncr
l5 jud roll-uff
prd rull
-rud rutl
lnrrJ nrll
Ijunri ly R{r id,.'ntinl
H*itlcnriul
Rr.'x iilrsrti*t I t !nrsing
tlwxllings
f,tcrehrgunr'nl
Oclrlupncnt
Family Rrsidcntiul
Rr.ridcnliul
llwrllingr
Dsrrchgrnml
Itclr:loFencnt
l-'nqrlxr.rin'g l;v.r rtrtr''snf t"rrncfr;afrrn (i;n; I*rrli:t - .tfcj.t -ir'fird . I tlrx# 557t
5&5fi
I | .{153
Er,5
s4t I $r!
s55l
${.{il I $
t?,1r
$t2.
s:dJ
5 tCIs
5 tlt7 $?,s l
5r1.5I
sfs.0l
5ll{.
st
Fl.?l
s+.
$.{,:

13.r
sr
[-lnit
LJnit
g{-7{1?
$t5.{!9:
5135
S ltl

5.1 3l
t
s
s
54tfr
5435

5.145 s 16.!
5:! sn.t
$
5 T
Unit
[-lnit
[Jnit
Unit
Sq. tt.

Sq" F't.

Unit
Llnit
Unit
Sq" f l,
Sq. Fl.
t6.l:t
$?,
5J ]J
f,ltfi
5l
5l4J
Sllt
!r!
!rl.{r x 5
s0,$n5
$0.003
gfi
55 $5
5CI,{!0:

Resolution No. 11233

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

FTf IIE$CRIPIION BATIIS FTf,
ffifrlntrtt
Esso lll?2
Aonurl
Inllrtisn
Mjurtnanl

20.2!
Annual
cclr
rEE
9nvttu
Proposrd
Eousins Inrst lrl'tc g.go-orot
CIffic€
Rftal
Light hdu$tbl
Haarly IndustiaUl\Ianufactluing
Light Industrial&Ianutbcturing
Sq. Ft.

SC-Fr-
Sq- Ft-
SC.Ft-
Sq. Ft.
$1-99
$r.99
$r-99
$l-99
$l-99
$ 0.054
$ 0.054
$ 0.054
$ 0.054
$ 0.054
$2.05
$z.os
$?-05
$a-os
$2.05
{ f,rgn rs.+.4rr1,&n,s&+'r:aridlmrru*l4rnf,+rtrdrdrv-,,&f,f3,tlnn*#'4rqr.+p ResolutionNo. 11233

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 2

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

ATTACHMENT 2
Horne , Construction Cost lndex History' As of May 2S24 Construction Cost lndex History - As of May 2024
HOW ENR BUILDS THE INDEX: 200 hours of common labor at the 20-city average of common tabor rates, ptus 25 cwt of standard structurat steet shapes at the mil,t price prior to 1996 and the fabricated Zl-city price from 1996, ptus L.128 tons of porttand cement at the 2O-city price, ptus 1,088 board ft of 2 x 4 lumber at the 20-city price.

View the ANNUAL AVERAGE FOR ENR'S CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX. 13515.02 13518.12 13532.01 13532.08 13532.44
13175.03 13175.93 13176.30 13229.57 r3288.27 13345.00 13424.98 13472.56 13485.67 13497.97 13510.57 13514.76 13358.05 12555.55 12683.97 12791.43 12898.96 13004.47 13110.50 13167.84 13171.07 13173.43 13174.92 13174.98 13175.00 13006.84 2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
'20L7
2016
t1627
11392
71206
10878
ro542
10t32
11698
1 1396
71213
10889
10559
10 181
9962
9681
11749
11397
t1224
10959
ro667
L0242
9972
9702
1 1849
114r2
1L224
1097t
10678
LO279
9992
9750
11989
11418
11230
11013
'L0692
10315
9975
9796
L2112
11436
1L268
11069
10703
LO337
10039
9800
12237
11439
L1293
11116
L0789
10379
1"0037
9835
t2463

11.455
1131L
LL!24
10826
10385
10039
9846
12464
11499
11311
LLLTO
10823
LO403
10065
9870
72464
11539
LL326
11X83
LO8L7
ro434
IOL28
9886
12467
LL579
11381
IIIA4
10870
1O442
10092
9972
12481
tL626
11381
1X186
10873
10530
LOL52
9936
12,133
LL465.67
tl2AL
1ro62
I0737
10338
10035
9806
2015 9972
2014 9664

07/23/2024 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff R ort
MEETING DATE: 7t2312024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT Resolution No. 11235 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. ll2l9 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Planning
F'ROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Resolution No. 11235 -A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 1I2I9 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Planning.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In May 2006, the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 7815 which established a new user fee schedule for selected city services and also adopted an annual inflationary adjustment.

The inflationary adjustment was last applied on November 1,2023.

POLICY / R TLE
City of Folsom Municipal Code Section 3.50.020 states, "The city manager is hereby directed to recommend to the council the adjustment of fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in this chapter and on the schedule of rate review as hereinafter established in this chapter. Costs reasonably borne shall be as defined in Section 3.50.030." City Council Resolution No. 7815 adopted on M;ay 23,2006, approved an annual inflationary adjustment to be applied each fiscal year for selected city user fees along with fee increases based on a fee study.
1

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

Government Code section 66018 requires a public hearing for certain fee increases.

Government Code section660l7 states fees may be effective no sooner than 60 days following the adoption of the increase in the fee or charge.

ANALYSIS
The annual inflationary adjustment to be appliedis2.62%o. This is based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI-West Urban Consumers, all items, San Francisco CMSA, Annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year as set forth in Resolution No. 7815.

The remaining Citywide User Fee schedule was approved by Council with Resolution No. ll2l9 on June 25,2024. Resolution No. 11235 is only pertaining to updating the Planning User Fees. The remaining user fee schedule for Resolution No. ll2l9 remains effective July r,2024.

Government Code section 66018 requires a public hearing for certain fbe increases.

Government Code section66017 states fees may be effective no sooner than 60 days following the adoption of the increase in the fee or charge. The Planning fees are proposed with Resolution No. 1 1235 as a separate Public Hearing item to meet this'requirement.

The proposed amendment to the Planning User Fees schedule is included as part of Resolution No. 11235 andwill be effective September 21,2024.

S

1. Resolution No. I1235 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. ll2l9 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Planning

2. United States Consumer Price Index - A11 Urban Consumers as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-West Urban consumers, all items, San Francisco CMSA as of December 2023
Finance DirectorS
2 Page 110
07/23/2024 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 1

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

RESOLUTION NO. II235
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 11219 AND

ENACTING THE ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FOR

CITY USER FEES FOR PLANNING
WHEREAS, City of Folsom Municipal Code Section 3.50.020 states "The city manager is hereby directed to recommend to the council the adjustment of fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in this chapter and on the schedule of rate review as hereinafter established in this chapter. Costs reasonably borne shall be as are defined in Section 3.50.030."; and WHEREAS, ResolutionNo. 7815 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 23,2006, allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to User Fees each fiscal year; and WHEREAS' Resolution No. ll2l9, adopted by Crty Council on June 25,2024, set the most recent User Fee schedule; and
WHEREAS, the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI-West Urban Consumers, all items, San Frqncisco CMSA annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year; and WHEREAS, as of December 31, 2023, the annual inflationary adjustment applied is

2.62%o; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and City Code; and
NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED thatthe Planning User Fees of the City-Wide User Fee Schedule in Resolution No. Il2l9 is hereby amended by enacting an Annual Inflationary Adjustment, effective September 2I,2024, as set forth in the fee schedule attached hereto.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as amended herein, all other User Fees in Resolution No. 11219 shall remain in force and effect.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of July 2024, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 11235

Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11235
Page2 of 4

07/23/2024 Item No.8.
ffst n t atl
lT.r,
I lltJl[l]
AIiNUJLI.
iltiFl.tno:{
,ttr.lf:s.TilIEtsr
Ird
Ff,Ti
{fl.;!rn.l# Ilf, PAflTIIE]|TISERtlCt:
(l$ olftlrum
Hrnnlr4 Urpr $'alr llffaclhs Fopt*rnhor ll';0!{
Tfi-I
Fl:J
t{i-l
FI.:J
Fili{t
pt.:.?
pti"?h
ItiJ{
FIi"il
Fli"lt!
xlli. I I
nr:- tl
$I:- r]
ru:-t5
Irt-lF
Ffr-ilr.

Fg-:{t
Pti-:l
Irl:-:l
Fr-:t
Fti-:.1
pl:l5
Fl:-r5b
FTJ$
XUJT
Ff:-:tpl:-I!i
IrL-}tt
xru-}1
ilfi-31
ni-}3
Iqi..!t
Nrli.SB
FIj.]?
Fl:-31{,
Itl:-l!r
FT:JD
ilti-t I
Fli."l,r b
Fl:.J]
t{i{l
trl:J.l
trtt1.Sl.

It'l:$4
IrIi,fr5
FtrJrb
Irti-ftT
H:{rB
Ftis!pf-?r!
pr-Tt
p[:-7]
Fnr'|ct lt*r'icw ldqtrnitl
F*r'.tt Llap Rrnicil' t*s{tr.rtil.}
b\rlrditisie$ l\trp Rcviln. lrlqrrxitl
!\lqr ;\nrr:nrlnu:nl Hn irrt lde$o*iti
lrtrip lir.urrrirm R.cvi*1r' hlcpuitl
DcriBn Reri<,n' . Fllnair:rg t'r*ntn ldc;rritl
Orsign lfut**r
llrtrlupnuu rslir:tr. irlc;uuitl
ll*rtihgnurru [hn[ R'n'ictt" {d$(v{ill
lltnrcilugnu:ru lirt.. Rrlir'*' liltprtitl
Flm fteriq'ldrpsirl
Flan ..lnurrrl. ltsritt' ldqrrxitl
linr,inrnmfitcl Stutt!"'..\cdartrl [rkFit*ill
lnrgnct ts*r-ir* .t RcJrrrrl
uf f'Ii$,1 dcr*nnirntirra
hl irignlinft lth:g. l\dmitrtitry
llir. SFF llcripr llr* {dultn*il1
*!unl l;asri{ilxrm Defnr f;lr+' {d.!F{t${ill
R+,r'icr*' - $f I1 {d$nritl
Rsuis* - lrlulr Funr!('rxrut. ilfuF *il I
Ili*r Eign S.mirr+ idcJuxitt
flcrnit - $tlff
Itcrrrit li*lcmirrn
Rrqrrc:r lt*l iq** - 5 ar.rur *rr lcrfr ldeprr5ilil
Rcqlr:rr Ri*'icrfi- 5 t-.rcrcc {dryr.,eit1
Line.,k{i.'fho{.1 lltcrpr fplnrurinsl Id$F{tti:il
{dWrsitl
tdrrffiitl,
Rciinr'- (htur t&ltr!.ill
.;r.dgnin
-hyr.th* Ld+Lrill
.ltnnfilEiffiI qrLpt lrit]
Flmr .l,nuruimnt - ! *'trl* ldrlxniil
ir..nrttl Flm,,tnrsrdtmurt .! lrilt {dqrtlnitl
ljs: trhm$t lt{rir"r\'
Urc Femdt S,eticrr, i ltlujnrl Id{F,$rill
tlsc Fcrnrir Ecti{$ {lrlinur} tdefttcit]
U.rs Ftrnrit hlrrlili*rtirll Nri:|l+rsil!
5 5
!
5 t
E
!
5 !
f
!
,5
t
ttt
I
tf
5 {
s
t
5 g
5 5
{
s
t!
E
c
tl
5 5
tt
s
5 T
5 t
ln.5.1.?
l$.9"ll r fil
3lTt l{h
l?l.ll,l-,ot
$ :rlI til4
r l:lg. ll.

51.!.1 i !1E,;rrrr
s. :l{trl5 lr.l.

I l:l{l
t lfin
( 1il
lll
s l*5
[]I50
tli5bitilr, I
tlllliI?TI l5.l
I:n
I l.tlt
$. {lt{}IT$ 13
[ 5'r
I lr:I l:{$1r l$l
1, ?l
I .ll
cllI llt{ca
!.rj
tI
!.l " 51 Rcnrrtll
gl
!. tt
!4t ll.
f. lt
I 656
3 5.? llt
sh"T I $ "tJ'l,X-$
t q,5 tS
I {.tx{?,
! {.?c{
t lrl!
Sill?t " l{Sjt,acrt
t .{t.!{tl
r 1..!l?
5 6.t3:
t ?.tr?b
t {r.il:
r tt.T{ti
5 -Ul't
t 6.4{!r
lfrl5 3.!l!l
t {t.t
r :,1lll
t {'J
J 13$
t {ill
5 |,glb
r Il0
5 -1,0{tJ
3 fr.nm
5 1,015
5 5,?ll1l
5 l,f,llb
5 Lell0
5 35rq
t -tls
5 !.1!?
5 {,}|fl
5 $,;lilt
s15r 5.r5lt
t !.{cl
! l,fi{?
{ l.!'b
! 5.-t{r5
t&l
5 !I.?llls
5 1l
5tfll i t4$ Scnerlrrl.
fr3t

5.5tlr
D aTt
l-rillJ
{.fTI
.lsl
FJI]fi
t, n5
r\:l{r
ItJl$-q
fr'-146
t{.5t-t
:{rf
fi-llt{
fi!
t-H.t
6t
t,l5*
rit
t:6
5il
tJlrl
tll:
l-{l$
5J{il:
tltt
5,6.t I
|,tr{J
l,{dJ
tl I
5lt!
t,!tF
rL5J.t
tLl
t"?-w
:"?.rq

1.60s
t"l:.1.
5-:E?
rbl
I t,llrl
1u
'i"n'litirrnrl
pu-?d.

IIL.?5
Ft:-?fr
F.Ii-T?
rfl.?n
Resolution No. I1235

I"*nr flrn iu,,l .t"hlnp" {rl,rpu*il}
i gnarnnnt Fnx.crsin g { rltplril 1
Hrsts lhnnit
('ffll\:r*iqn Fdr:
$n:npltion Fnnril F*i:
lfun*iua tlutt
rn l Flulrnin*c lltilt r
Tmc
ll e'*trd llirrnirrnll fiFtu
$lrrr (ll*rt l'cr tr Flanningtr
Fr:rnnit
Srrriscx FEr
"tl*irrrnr:e.i'lilrird F*rtr eurist+' ffi InsFrulihn
Trw ncsnuar*l or in{trr!61 wi{hin {hc huihkhle
nf l nxidrtnil lst {lHtr l-dirrnclcr Srcr insiltl
Tips rwnurqnl r.r inrgt.,.-ml lllSll-dhmcrr pcr
5l {fi t- $4S El:lrew.il
f t5t
t l!r.T
5 tTt
f :8?
s lfi
ItX.. rrf building
p*ilnit lpe
t 4-i

1.5 "t &cgulrr l'i,r:
.4rrurl (hrl
ll5.nl}{$.flll
;I
5 I
s.
l5r(
.tss
l?5
!r5
l0
lfll; ul'fruildiag
fuc
5 .llt
l5 ,t lirprlar fcc
.,lrilrl ffft
ll5.m iD6Itt
J5{r.rflt i0!ittNl_10.trfi{l}$ili

07/23/2024 Item No.8.
flg al Fdrnm
Shnnlng Urer Fear Elftttht Sofllmber ll' X[n{
[rtludcd lr lsrr frtr Frc Sdrfihh f un I I I lt rllmd* tf lflll.l ,t.tHo
!.d5 t
:IF
{!e
ti'i of{irat lllt
?1" arrt Slh
li;, nrlt t{lllh
dTl, n*t ItHk
It; rranuisdcr

5.?4:
ilL? t'i
.r#tt
Ifi.l
lflt
lJl4
l"5lf.

I "{tll'.}
lll
Irs
tlll + 5l-96',*1. S:.
!-e5l
lI;rr+{u aP:lf J-ilu.
s
T
5 x
I
II
!.
i
5 5
5 t
5 I
f.
t
s
ittI
t,
I
$
x
i
Rccu I I l[i
ftrsu llllti
[e*u llll{f
*eag l l lFd
tresu I llt{i
ftcsu I l.l[fr
fteo I ll116
*cruill116
Itrgu I llltf
*llu I llltt
*rgu ll ll{6
Rgu lllli6
Itsa lll116
Iteralt116
f;cla I llllfi
Sso I llHt
ftc* I I lBt
*rgo lll116
*urolll16
ftero I I lltf
ftero I lllt6
ftsu lllHG
ITtr,.-s
T}LJI
pl:-lti,
trrn-{?
I}TJl{
[rltJ!
Irt.Sll
pti--st
sr-ll
$tL53
ilfi-5.t
sfi.stpf-5fi
Ft-5?
n4i-$a
14:-5rt
m:Jill
Flidlr
Ffi.fr:h
FIi,fr3r
Ffi.63h
Diti-?l
iricll $llp '\rncn+1,{lctt
r,tf fnrnxiiuo f drpr*ill
Ri3ilrt rrf !\irp' Eui{srnt Ahundlotrnhtnt
frw fsnrn'll Flyn. Prrnrittrrl Rsnund
lmc [rnrrn'rl Fm. wto Fpnr*t
ling lt{' * hrqt . 5l hl 510.{ltll
tingFt"& ln"qI - tl{l,olll -*ll$.{i!l$
liug Xtt' & lnqrl - Sl{ll}ft.SN{!!}.{gir
ling Ft' & ln-tJr I - l.Sl0ll-tl:tl$,9!l{
fngnt{'" *Iuqr! -s.}{{tt-
Fur*l hlry tihr.ck
Fiarl Mapfha.&
!J,'1 fi cvir*' - llagin*rirg
t uarrh uf ling *r:arrr& llluudyl
His Eng 5m'ice [llurrlyi
Bcri*,*' rrf f, {}W.'lllrsmfi t lJu':x
Jtxrmt lli*,('f !l hynuru Prncrsring
luhditixiuo .{grfi mcrl Sntri**ing
firansFrlnliin, Ffinitr
fr,lr*prrutirrl lltnnit* | Innu:llt
liocn'rldrrurcol furnil*
liarrurhrnrmt Fr:rnrit { ;lnnsrl }
Ixi.latirl I:urls:lu Pntia' llihnl{trdflm ilrmdt
I
frerrtlrr f,tttr t,lmnrfuwul u q[ llttnt*6r{ttf.,pnrihrr ro&-rdnr;rur, .t ll lrnilrg rr,G nqsilfil lir ih. nnrnil tll&.

ResolutionNo. 11235

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 2

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

ATTACHMENT 2
Databases, Tables & Calculators by SubJect
u.a lrrnril, or t4gdn iTfitrftc3
ChrnlrOulDrl optL{rr!
*
rDornrcrdr
f$,*Ft
*",*Lr,l-b:J@
|Fnlrirtfishtt/olrl$tj
l|loruFomatlinr0utinml
-t
includegraphs olauel averages
9il6 elt.art€d on: Ap{il :15, Iil24 {4:?a:l? pi,l}
Gcnluinlr prlr! lhd?r lot Sl Uttrn Gonruln:ts {Cpt-Ul
fcltirld! cuuFStts$s$,cuusg49Bsil'
{ot S6asooslly Adlusts.l
Serlrrfhhc All items h Srn Francitm4alilrod-rlaywrd, {lA, r{l urhen sn*rmErs, ilot i€€ronrlly adjult€d An* $an Fnnci$r0aLl*n*Hryrrad, CA
lbm! Allilfins
luenrrlodr rg€1{4-100
U.5. EiJREAU OF ICEOR STATISIICS turt l Squar€ Birildtru ? Mfi{arjluriin$ A$e{rue ilf '.\h5fttngton, DC ?0?t?{0nr TeleFhoffi:1-tsz{91-5100_ Telemmnunifetu*li Flcl8|l g+flirci7-t-l_ nmbls*goil con{tdt Lic l|rr fit Frb llr T!f ,lltr Jrn Jd {rtr 3lT 6.i llft lrn lnnlnl rntFl H*ttt alu e48.6r5 15t,495 t53.lr7 151.t54 154.503 t32.173 15r,9€5 358,50? 253,1161 tolt l5r.9l0 257.64r l59,ll? 159-Sl? 261.0t9 t60.2Eg 15E.57t 256.?13 lEo.ltzl ill3 262.5U0 16{.tff5 It6,rNE 1$?.S.53 :rru,;{|d 1e9.rB3 lt6,3.{ 263,911 1$&lt? $rt f?r,616 t?{,$80 Itg.34{ lr$.0€t !?r,s?0 l?t,{!4 xr{,9}4 ??3,30d 176.5.I tatt lsl,ltl8 tr3.{lt t86,0Gl 10?,664 20s.G?3 t68.8t{ 19s,550 2r$t,666 t0B.it!5 lmD ltt.tt? il{,tot t33.t!l9 t95.400 lr€,4it3 ?9?.00t lq5.m4 2$3.t50 196.&D t0tD 108,690 tg8,D14 1{t0,03t 300,1s1 's01,716 302.9{8 3{0.094 tD9,l0d 30I.050 tiilr 30a,mr m0,4r9 ap.rtT 3u.167 3t!,16t 3r5,8fi3 $9,??r 30{.t14 ln.?rs ltltt ilo,1H t2t.8?8 l:r0,$3s :utB.[7t r3e.062 trt.2ut lil7.660 3tt.a0c $0"Ttr ttrtt tl?, ll3 !il.498 r{0.0t6 il10r00'l 14l,1t0 3$.0rr 3il.060 33r,6!0 t l0,{ll lslr E4J, t9t

07/23/2024 Item No.8.

This page is intentionallA Ieft blonk
to facilitate double- sided printing
ond minimize paper ttse.

CITY OF

DISTINCTIVE BY NATURE

FOLS()TI

07/23/2024 Item No.8.
i:r i
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 712312024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11236 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge Il/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates EastNo. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the'City Council adopt Resolution No. 1 1236 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On June ll, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. I I2l4 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Following Landscaping and Lighting Districts forPage 119 07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge Il/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Siena Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs. The Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting (L&L) Districts addresses the annual assessment for each of the city's 30 existing Landscaping and Lighting Districts.

As was the case in Fiscal Year 2023-2024,Natoma Station-Union Square L&L will not be assessed for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 since the Homeowners' Association has elected to cover maintenance costs at this time.

POLICY / RULE
Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22586, an annual Engineer's Report shall be filed with the City Clerk. The City Council is also required to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment pursuant to Section 22631of the Streets and Highway Code.

ANALYSIS
The Preliminary Engineer's Report approved by Resolution No. ll2l4 described the maintenance and servicing to be performed in the city's 30 Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The establishment of annual assessments for each of the L&L Districts requires a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment. The Engineer's Report is in compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; including but not limited to Sections 22565 et seq (preparing a report that complies with the article); and Sections 22660 and 226 62 (regarding annual installments procedure s/proce ss).

Assessment to Properties
This year's assessments to properties have been broken up into three categories and are depicted in the provided table below. Districts that are showing an increase in assessments this year are districts that were formed with provisions for CPI (consumer price index) otherwise known as an escalator, or cost of living increase. Many of these districts are newer districts or overlay districts that either still do not have an adequate fund balance or need the additional assessments to achieve a balanced budget. The next category is static or no increase. These are the districts that do not have provisions for CPI's or have CPI's but do not need to utilize them currently to achieve abalanced budget. The last category is decrease, these are districts that have an adequate fund balance and do not need to levy the full assessment to achieve a balanced budget. There was also one (1) district being removed from the tax roll, Union Squpre because it has an HOA that manages their landscape areas.

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

N 2024125
Asscssment
ler sFE Dlfferencc
lncreare /
Decrea3c
rlt2O24l25
Mexlmum
Authorlzcd RateDktrlct
rY2023124
Assessment
per SFE
Ameracan River Canvon North No. 2 S ss.48 S tt,to $ zz,zz lncrease 77.70 s 271,.22 s 312.96 S 41,.74 lncreage s ?t2,96American River Canvon North No. 3 s 218.60 s L43.74 lncrease s 2t8,60Elue Ravine Oaks $ ze.ge Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 s s 110.92 s 110,92 Increage 110.93 S 40.84 ; 41.90 S 1.06 lncrease 47.91Broadstone No. 3
S 41.16 S 42.40 S r.za lncrease s 42.40Broadstone No. 4 - Zone A Broadstone No. 4 - Zone I S 39.20 S rto.38 S r.rg lncrease s 40.38 S 38.64 ; 39.80 S 1.16 lncrease 39.80sBroadstone No. 4 - zone C s 37.90 s 39.04 S 1.14 lncrease s 39.04Broadstone No. 4 - Zone D Cobble Ridce S 139.48 s 191.96 S sz.ca lncrease 257.825 s 2s,s8 238.56 ; 29.98 lncrease 241.59Folsom Helghts No.2 s 333.02 s 343.00 s 9.98 lncrease s 343.01Pralrie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Prosnect Rldne i r,269.82 S 1,317.44 s 47.62 lncrease S 1,317.45 S 4t9.28 s 44s.90 S 16.12 lncrease r1,45.91sSlerra Estates S 228.24 s 75s.s6 s 27.32 lncrease s 755.56The Residences at Amerlcan River Canyon The Resldences at Amerlcan Rlver Canyon ll ; 1,512.50 s 1,s69.22 $ s6.72 lncreasa S 1,569.23 Wlllow Creek Estates East No. 2 - Zone A&8 s 107.64 s ru.68 s 4.04 lncreese s 111.69 s 98.96 s 102.62 s 3.66 lncrease s 102.67Wlllow Creek Estates East No. 2 - Zone C s l4s.42l Reduced s 183.58[ake Natoma Shores i 183.58 5 rsg.rs 877.36 s 397.44 s (479.92! Reduced s 1,050.02Natoma Valley s 102.94 s 102.94 s Static LO2.94sAmerican River Canyon North Static 3 722.28Brims Ranch S 122.28 $ 122.28 s
S 164.98 , 164.98 t static Lil.99Eroadstone
s 113.14 s 113.14 s Static s 1.13.L4Cobble Hllls lllReflections ll s 70.88Folsom Heirhts S 70.88 5 zo.ag t Static
S t95.78 5 t95.78 Static t95.78Hannaford Cross
s 121.18 s L21.L8 s Static s T2L,L8Los Cerros
Natoma Station ) 91.70 $ gr.zo I Static 91..71s
s 213.60 s 213.60 s Static s 2L3.6LPrairie Oaks Ranch
5 t32.27 s Static s t32.32Silverbrook S 132.27
Ste€Dlechase i 157.68 S 1s7.68 s Static 157.68s
s 80.tm s 80.40 s Static s 80.40Willow Creek Estates East s 109.88 s Static s 109.88Willow Creek Estates South i 109.88 Wlllow Sodnqs s 28.14 28.14 Statlc 28.14
Assessment to Properties by District
Installment Summary
The installment summaries describe short-term installments collected pursuant to Section 22660 of the Streets and Highways Code to meet the districts' future repair and replacement needs anticipated to occur within an approximate five-year time frame, as well as long-term installments collected to meet those future needs anticipated to occur within 5 to 30-year time frames.

Comparison to Last Year
District budgets for this upcoming year will continue focusing on improvements and restorations that enhance each district's commitment to water conservation, prolonging assets' life, drought- tolerant landscaping improvements, fire safety, and tree stewardship. As such, some districts will be retrofitting and centralizingirrigation controllers, inventorying street trees, changing out plant materials to water wise materials, and converting over to LED streetlights. Many of the city's districts are over 25 years old and do not have escalators built into their rates to track cost- of-living increases and economic changes. As such, districts being monitored for future outreach

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
regarding a new assessment overlay district are Briggs Ranch (32 yearc old), Hannaford Cross (32 years old), and Cobble Ridge II / Reflections II (29 years old). Additionally, Broadstone No.4 was approved by voters and adopted by the City Council in July ,2016. The budget for Broadstone No. 4 was structured to provide for immediate needs in the first five years by way of a higher assessment, then reduced to a lower assessment for maintenance in the following years.

This second (reduced) level of assessment is inadequate to address the long-term maintenance and renovation needs of the district. Lastly, the city will continue outreach for an increase in Natoma Station in the 2024-2025 Fiscal Years.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Each Landscaping and Lighting District levies and collects funds to cover operating and maintenance costs attributed to district assets. There is no fiscal impact to the City of Folsom General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11236 - A Resolution Approving the Final Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IliReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs

2. Final Engineer's Report - The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, May 2024
Submitted,
Kelly GoruaIez, Parks & Recreation Director

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 11236

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

RESOLUTION NO. 11236

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEEROS REPORT FOR THE

FOLLOWING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 AMERTCAN RrVER CANYON NORTH' AMERTCAN RrVER CANYON NORTH NO. 2, AMERTCAN RrVER CANYON NORTH NO. 3, BLUE RAVTNE OAKS' BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO.2, BRTGGS RANCH, BROADSTONE, BROADSTONE NO. 4, BROADSTONE UNIT NO. 3, COBBLE RIDGE, COBBLE HILLS RIDGE II/REFLECTIONS II, FOLSOM HETGHTS, FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO.2o HANNAFORD cRoss, LAKE NATOMA SHORES, LOS CERROS, NATOMA STATTON, NATOMA VALLEY, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2, PROSPECT

RIDGEO SIERRA ESTATES, SILVERBROOKO STEEPLECHASE, THE RESIDENCES

AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON, THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER

CANYON II, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EASTO WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH, AND WILLOW SPRTNGS
WHEREAS, On June 11,2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11214 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone UnitNo. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs; and
WHEREAS, July 23,2024 at 6:30 p.m. is the day and time set for hearing objections to the levying of said assessments as identified in Exhibit A attached to this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Final Engineer's Report for the Assessment Districts has been made, filed with the City Clerk and considered by the City Council and is deemed sufficient and approved. The Final Engineer's Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this resolution, Section 22500, et. seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

ResolutionNo. 11236
Page I of4

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

NOW' THEREFORE, THE CrTY COUNCTL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: The City Council finds that the Final Engineer's Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Districts in full compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and, based on said Report, adopt and approve the following actions:

Approve as submitted, the Final Engineer's Report filed with this City Clerk for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year2024-2025.

Confirm and approve the diagrams and assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Continue to order the levy of assessments as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

Order the maintenance and servicing of improvements as set forth in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts Final Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year2024-2025.

Request that the Auditor of Sacramento County enter on the Sacramento County Assessment Roll the assessment for each lot or parcel of land in the amount indicated in the Final Engineer's Report.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23'd day of July 2024by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
Michael D. Kozlowski, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 11236

1 2
3 4
5

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Exhibit A
OF RESOLUTION No. 11236

CITY OX'F'OISOM

LANDSCPAING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS
F'ISCAL YEAR 2024.2025
ResolutionNo. 11236

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Dlstrlct
iY202il24
Arsessment per
SFE
Credlt or
lncrease ior FY
2t124
w 2o24l2'
Assessment pcr
SFE
American Rlver Canyon North No.2 55.48s 22.22$ 77.705
American Rlver Canyon North No. 3 s 271.22 41.74s $ lrz.so Blue Ravine Oaks 74.86s S 143.24 $ zre.eo
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 $ S uo.gz S uo.gz
Broadstone No.3 s 40.84 s 1.06 4t.90s
Broadstone No. 4 - Zone A 4t.L6s t.24s s 42.40
Broadstone No. 4 - Zone B 39.20s 1,18s 40,38s
Broadstone No. 4 - Zone C s 38.64 1.16s 39,80$
Broadstone No.4 - Zone D 37,90s s L.l4 s 39,04
Cobble Ridge 5 rgg.aa s 52.48 S rgr.ge
Folsom Heishts No. 2 $ zos.sg 29.98s s 238.s6
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 5 ggg.oz 9.98s S 343.00
Prospect Ridge 5 t,269.82 47.625 5 t,3t7.a4
Slerra Estates S +zg.ze 16.12s S a+s.go
The Resldences at Amerlcan Rlver Canyon $ zrg.aa 27.37s $ zss.se The Resldences at Amerlcan Rlver Canyon ll S 1,512.50 55.72s S r.569.22 Wlllow Creek Estates East No. 2 - Zone A&B S 107.64 4.04s $ ur.ea Wlllow Creek Estates East No. 2 - Zone C s 98.96 3.66$ $ roz.ez Lake Natoma Shores s 183,s8 s {4s.42} s 138.16
Natoma Valley $ stz.ge s {47e.e2) S sgr.aa
American Rlver Canyon North S roa.ga s s 102.94
Briggs Ranch s 122.28 5 S nz.za
Broadstone 5 roc.gg s 5 rea.ge
Cobble Hills lllReflections ll s 113.14 s S ul.ra
Folsom Heights s 70.88 s 70.88s
Hannaford Cross 5 rgs.zs s S rgs.ze
Los Cerros S nr.$ s 5 rzr.rg
Natoma Station 9t.70s s 9t.70$
Pralrie Oaks Ranch s 213.60 s $ zrg.oo
Silverbrook S tgz.zt s S tgz.zt
Steeplechase S rsz.os s S rsz.sa
Willow Creek Estates East s 80.40 $ 80.40s
Willow Creek Estates South 5 rog.gg 5 $ rog.ae
Wlllow Springs 28.14s s s 28.14
Assessment to Properties by District
Resolution No. 11236

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 2

FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

CITY OF FOLSOM
Engineer's Report For: FiscalYear 2024/25
[andscape and Lighting Assessment Districts
May 2O24
STNBS
Prepared by:
hclplng oommunltl.!
tund tomorrow
Corporate Headquarters
32605 Ternecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516nbsgov.com Page 129
07/23/2024 Item No.9.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Engineer'sLetter........

2.L Background

2.2 Process for AnnualAssessment

4. Estimate of Costs and Budgets

5. Method of Apportionment.......

5.1 Discussion of Benefit

5.2 General versus Special Benefit....,

5.3 Quantification of General Benefit

5.4 Method of Apportionment..........,

5.5 Assessment Apportionment........,

5.6 MaximumAssessmentlncrease..,

5.7 Fiscal Year 2O24/2SMaximum Assessment..........

6. AssessmentDiagram..

8. Assessment Rolls
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024125 Engineer's Report t
...2
.,,..'''..2

2.3 LegislativeContext 3

3.1- Desription of lmprovements .........
.2L
.22
23 23
37 ','',.37
39 .7
18 19
L9
42 SNBs

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
3" ENGINEER'S LETTER
WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Folsom (the "ciq/'), state of california, under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Acf'), directed NBS to prepare and file an Enginee/s Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Distrlcts for Fiscal Year 2024125, in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act and Article Xlll D of the California Constitution. The report presents the plans and specificatlons describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the administration, maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2024/25, the diagram for the Districts, showing the area and properties to be assessed, and assessing the net amount upon the assessable lots and/or parcels within the Dlstricts in proportion to the special benefit received.

NOW THEREFORE, the assessments as detailed in this Englnee/s Report and as summarized in the table below are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the Districts in proportion to the special benefit received.

SummaryCost Estimate
(1) Total amount levied may differ slightly due to installment rounding. (2) A list of Districts, the total proposed Fiscal Year 2024125 assessments, the number of parcels assessed, and assessment rates are detailed in Section 8 ofthis Enginee/s Report.
l, the undersigned, respectfully submit this Enginee/s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Enginee/s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared, computed and levied in accordance with the assessment methodolog;y adopted, approved and ordered by the City Council of the City of Folsom at the time of each District formation.

G. Egan, P. ?pL
Engi neer
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Ughting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024125 Engineer's Report I
53,025,627.67lmprovement Costs
437,542.05lncidentalCosts
$3,463,L69.72Total lmprovement Costs
($L,0O7,763.47)Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution) s2AsSA06.25Total Balance to Assesslzl
fr0. l4BEl
ctrtr
G.
7l}NBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

2. INTRODUCTION

2.L Background
The City has previously formed 30 Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") to provide funding for the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, sidewalks, fences, walls, parks, open space, signage, soundwalls, street lighting, and other public improvements in the City. The 30 Districts are as follows:
o American River Canyon North o Los Cerros
r American RiverCanyon North No. I c Natoma Station
r American River Canyon North No. 3 o Natoma Valley
o Blue Ravine Oaks ' o Prairie Oaks Ranch
o Blue Ravine Oaks No. ) o Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
r Briggs Ranch o Prospect Ridge
o Broadstone r Sierra Estates
o Broadstone No,3 o Silverbrook
r Broadstone No, I o Steeplechase
o Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflections ll o The Residences at American River Canyon r Cobble Ridge o The Residences at American River Canyon ll o Folsom Heights o Willow Creek Estates East
o Folsom Heights No. 2 o Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 r Hannaford Cross o Willow Creek Estates South
o Lake Natoma Shores o Willow Springs

2.2 Process for Annual Assessment
The Districts were formed and assessments were established in previous fiscal years. As required by the procedures specified in the Act, an Engineer's Report must be prepared on an annual basis which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. The Engineer's Report may also identify future planned projects.

The City Council must also annually adopt a resolution of intention which:
o Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein.

Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report a
2QIVBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
a Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicates the general location of the assessment district.
o Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. o Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
o States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year, lf the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment allowed, the City Clerk shall give notice of the public hearing by causing the resolution of intention to be published at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest.

During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. lf the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment allowed, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article Xlll D and Proposition 218.

The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. lf confirmed, the assessments would be submitted to the County Auditor Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll.

2.3 Legislative Context
ln 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, known as the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," which added Articles Xlll C and Xlll D to the California Constitution. Article Xlll D established new substantive and procedural requirements on agencies for levying assessments, being levies on real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. "Special benefit" is defined in Article Xlll D as "a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on a real property located in the district or to the public at large.".

Article Xlll D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:
r All parcels that will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed must be identified;
o The general benefits must be distinguished from the special benefits conferred on the parcels; o The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel must be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, orthe cost of the property related service being provided;
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 3rCNBs

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
a The amount assessed to a parcel must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and must not include any costs attributable to the general benefit; and
o Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

Since the initial passage of Proposition 2L8, several court rulings have helped provide context and direction with respect to the procedures and requirements of Article Xlll D for levying assessments. Several of the key concepts from these rulings are summarized below. I

GENERAL BENEFIT
Article Xlll D requires an agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on the identified parcels because only special benefits are assessable.

The Court of Appeal in Golden Hills Neighborhood Assn., lnc. v. City of San Diego (2OtI) ("Golden Hills") clarified this concept by stating, "Seporation and quontification of general and special benefits must be accomplished by opportioning the cost of o service or improvement between the two ond ossessing property owners only for the portion of the cost representing speciol benefits." The Court of Appeal in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010) (" Beutz") noted that the trial court took judicial notice of the Legislative Analyst's Office pamphlet titled "Understanding Proposition 2L8" which states an agency must, "estirnate the omount of special benefit landowners would receive from the project or service, os well as the omount of 'generol benefit.'This step is needed becouse Proposition 218 qllows local government to recoup from ossessments only the proportionate share of cost to provide the speciol benefit."
The Court in Beutz furthered this idea stating, "Seporating the generalfrom the special benefits of a public improvement project ond estimoting the quontity of each in relation to the other is essentiol if an ossessment is to be limited to the speciol benefits."
The Court of Appeal in Silicon Valley Toxpoyers' Associotion Incorporated v. Santa Claro County Open Spoce Authority (2008) (SWA') clarified that general benefits are not restricted to benefits conferred only on persons and property outside the assessment district but can include benefits both conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. The "public at large" includes all members of the public, including those who live, work, and shop within the district, and not simply transient visitors.

The Court of Appeal again reiterated the need to separate, quantify and apportion costs to general benefits from the improvementsin Brood Beach Geologic Hazord Abatement District v 31.506 Victoria Point LLC (2022), stating, "The District cites no authority, and we are owore of none, suggesting that an ogency's subjective intent determines the need to occount for generol benefits."

BEN EFIT-BASED NOT COST-BASED
ln Town of Tiburon v. Bononder (2009) ("Tiburon"), the Court of Appeal clarified the idea that assessments must be apportioned based upon benefit rather than cost. The Court stated, "Proportionote special benefit is the basis upon which a project's totol assessoble costs are apportioned omong porcels within on assessment district."
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 4\)NBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

The assessment on a particular property cannot be based on the relative cost of the improvements to the property, but rather on the special benefit conferred on such property. The Court inTiburon also stated, "on ossessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvement or property-related service, Iess ony amount ottributable to general benefits (which may not be ossessed), allocated to individual properties in proportion to the relotive speciol benefit conferred on the property."

MEASURING AND APPORTIONING SPECIAT BENEFIT
The Court in Tiburon acknowledged the difficulty of trying to precisely assign and measure special benefit, stating, "Any attempt to classify speciol benefits conferred on particular properties ond to assign relotive weights to those benefits will necessarily involve some degree of imprecision." The Court in Tiburon went on to say that a formula assigning equal weight to different special benefits "may be a legolly justifiobte opproach to measuring and opportioning speciol benefits, [brit] it rs not necessarily the only valid approach. Whichever approach is taken to meosuring and apportioning speciol benefits, however, it must be both defensible ond consistently applied." City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 5GlNBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The work and improvements proposed to be undertaken by the City and the cost thereof paid from the continuation of the annual assessment provide special benefit to parcels within the Districts as defined in the Method of Assessment herein, Consistent with the Act, the Districts' work and improvements are generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundv{alls, sidewalks, monuments, statuary, fountains, water quality ponds, park facilities, open space, bike trails, walkways, drainage swales, other ornamental structures and facilities, entry signage, street pavers, art work, and monuments, as well as all necessary appurtenances, labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment, as applicable, for property owned or maintained by the City. Any plans and specifications for these improvements have been filed with the City and are incorporated herein by reference.
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinaryand usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. b) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. c) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. d) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of:
a) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.
b) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvement5.

Plans and Specifications for the improvements are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Engineer's Report. The Plans and Specifications for each District are on file with the City and are available for public inspection.
lncluded is a separate but integral tool: the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District lmprovement Plan ("lmprovement Plan"). lt is a separate planning document that identifies the type of upcoming improvements (e.g. re-landscaping a corridor or painting a wall); the estimated cost; any installments required for short-term (less than five years) and/ar long term (not greater than 30 years) improvements, and the approximate schedule for completion of the improvements. The City intends to continually update and revise the lmprovement Plan throughout each year to reflect the current status of improvement projects, budget updates and/or changes in priorities.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 6QNBs

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

The concept of the lmprovement Plan arose from the City's commitment to comply with the requirements of the Act as well as produce a valuable instrument that enables the City to schedule, prioritize, and plan for needed maintenance and servicing improvements in the districts. lt also serves as a user-friendly means for members of the public to review and understand the use of the assessment revenues generated from each District.

The assessment proceeds from each District will be exclusively used for improvements within that District plus incidental expenses. Reference is made to Section 4 - Estimate of Costs and Budgets, Section 7 - Budgets, and the additional plans and specifications, including District specific expenditure and improvement plans, which are on file with the City.

3.1 Description of lmprovements
The following are descriptions of the improvements for each of the Districts.

AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians, corridors, and open spaces. o Purchase of irrigation water from San luan Suburban Water District. o Maintenance of irrigation system, entry fountain, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
e Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Waterfall pumps, autofill, filters, and chlorination system. o Waterfall pond liner (concrete and other).

AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.2
o Purchase of electric power.
e Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Paint and replace streetlight poles.

AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO,3
o Purchase of electric power.
o Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. o Maintenance of landscaping, open space, lighting, signs, sidewalk and walls, waterfalls, including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, and signs,
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportGrwBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O24/25:
r Oak Avenue and American River Canyon Drive turf replacement. o East Side or American River Canyon Drive turf replacement.

Ladder fuel removal in open ipaces.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Centralized irrigation controller upgrade.
o Signage replacement.
e Waterfall rock repair.
o Baldwin Dam path repair.
o Tree and landscape improvements (or replacements).
o American River Canyon Drive/Canyon Falls (Cascade perimeter) landscaping, remove/replace trees, mow band replacement.
r Main Walking Trail landscaping, irrigation, stairs and clean up.

BLUE RAVINE OAKS AND BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO.2
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls, and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O24/25:
o Turf renovation Timson Drive and Riley Street.

Future I mprovement Projects:
r Blue Ravine Road wall repair.
o Riley Street fence replacement.
o Signage replacement
r Turf renovation Hazelmere Drive and Riley Street.
o Turf renovation between Hazelmere Drive and Timson Drive,

BRIGGS RANCH
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from City.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, walls, fences, open space area, signage, and streetlights.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 8C)NBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o Ladder fuel removal.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Shrub and tree upgrades (Blue Ravine Road/East Natoma Street). o Fence/wallrepair/replacement.
o Fence repair/replacement (East Natoma Street partial). o Trail repairs.
o Petstations repair/replacement.
o Bollardrepair/replacement.
o Fence repair/replacement (Blue Ravine Road partial).
r Entry sign replacement (brass lettering).
o lrrigation upgrades/replacement (three controllers).
o 'Landscape lighting upgrades or replacement.
o Tree and landscape improvements (partial collection)., BROADSTONE AND BROADSTONE NO.4
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
r Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, sound walls, water quality ponds, and streetlights.
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures,
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o Ladder fuel removal.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree and landscape improvements (partial fund collection). o Bollardrepair/replacement(40).
r Light polefixture replacement of KW.
o Trail repairs.
o Repair irrigation, replace shrubs (lron Point Road median, Rathbone Circle, Knopfler Circle, and other interior areas).
o Tree and landscape improvements or replacements.
o Shrub replacement throughout (some irrigation repair) 28 acres. o Landscape light repair/replacement (60 lights).
o Pet station replacement (7).
o Signagerepair/replacement.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 9GINBS

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
e Turf removal/irrigation retrofit.
o lrrigation upgrades and flow (15 controllers),
BROADSTONE NO.3
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street light fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects,
Future I mprovement Projects:
o Paint streetlight poles (350 poles).
coBBLE HTLLS RTDGE lll REFTECTIONS ll
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, soundwalls, signage, parks, park facilities, open space, and streetlights.
o Purchase of electric power from Sacramento Municipal Utility District. r Maintenance of public lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r No planned improvement projects,
Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree and landscape improvements or replacement.
o Turf and shrub repair/replacement (Mini Park and path to Lembi Drive). . Fence repair/replacement (225 feet).
r Wall repairs and painting (628 feet).
o Shrub replacement (Glenn Drive/Oxburough Drive and Sibly Street and Corner). o Signagerepair/rePlacement.

COBBLE RIDGE
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
r Maintenance of the irrigation system and plantings in a useful and workable condition, together with maintaining walls, and open space areas.
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r Fence repair and painting.

Future lmprovement Projects:

Tree pruning.
o Fence repair/replacement and painting.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportQNBS 10

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
r Shrub replacement
r Tubularfence repair/replacement.
o Tree and landscape improvements or replacement.

FOLSOM HEIGHTS AND FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO. 2
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
e Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks, and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
e Tree pruning.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning and tree care in open space.
o Fence work.
. Glenn Drive wall repair.
o Tree and landscape improvements (Vierra Circle).
o Landscape replacement (Glenn Drive).

HANNAFORD CROSS
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water and electric power for the two mini parks in a 7O%/30% (City/District) contribution (based on maintenance assignments).
o Maintenance of irrigation system, bike trails, walkways, fences, walls, guard shack, drainage swale, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r No planned improvement projects.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Lakeside fence repair,
o Repairs at guard shack.
o Tree pruning.

City of Folsom
Landsca'ping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS tt

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

IAKE NATOMA SHORES
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Maintenance of irrigation system, soundwalls, signage, street pavers, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights.
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o LED landscape lights.
o Tree pruning.
r Signagerepair/rePlacement.
o Turf repair and irrigation upgrades.
r Tree and landscape improvements or replacement.

LOS CERROS
o Maintenance of landscape medians and corridors.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r Ladder fuel removal.
r Paint streetlight poles.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree replacement.
r Tree pruning
. Upgrade irrigation controllers'
o lnstall flow package and master valve.

NATOMA STATION
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, artwork, open space areas, parks, plantings, and streetlights.
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS T2

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o Ladder fuel removal.

Future lmprovement Projects:
r Light pole replacement.
o Shrub and tree replacement / concrete work on turnpike. r lron Point Road shrub and tree replacement,
. Bigfoot mini park tree replacement.
r Tree replacement / wall damage on Black Diamond Drive. o Shrub and tree replacement on Blue Ravine Road.
r Tree pruning.
o Tree and landscape improvements or replacements.
o Wetland area improvements.
o Wall repair and painting (7,800 linear feet).
o Mini park replanting / b,ark (two parks @ 0.5 acre).
o Road paver replacement.
r Signage repair / replacement.
o Sidewalk repair.
o lrrigation upgrades.
r Art repair.

Union Square: A Benefit Zone within Natoma Station will be providing its own landscaping and lighting maintenance via an existing homeowner's association for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

NATOMA VATLEY
o lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, soundwalls, retaining walls, fencing and all necessary appurtenances, labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r lnteriorlandscapeimprovements.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Wallrepair/replacement.
o Landscape replacement on Upper Tier and Lower Tier.

PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH AND PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO.2
o Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report{.lINBS 13

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
. Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street, and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:

Year 1 tree pruning.
o Ladder fuel removal.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Tree and landscape replacement.
e Fence replacement.
o LED landscape lights.
o Repair damaged walls (stucco half walls).
o Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine Road.
o Landscape Replacement on Riley Street.
o Landscape Replacement on Prairie City Road.
o Landscape replacement on lron Point Road.
o Post and cable replacement.

PROSPECT RIDGE
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, signage, open space areas, parks, plantings, and streetlights.
o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
o Maintenance of landscape corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
e Wall replacement,
o Plant replacement.

SIERRA ESTATES
o Maintenance of landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along Rowland Court, Dolan Court and Riley Street including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report(3lNBS t4

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
lighting, fencing, soundwalls, monuments, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry monuments, and all necessary appurtenances. r Purchase of water from the City.
r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures,
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.

SILVERBROOK
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree replacement.
o Medianrelandscaping.

STEEPTECHASE
o Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, and streetlights. r Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2O24/25:
o Year4tree pruning.
o Trail repairs.

Future I mprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.

THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON
o Maintenance landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along American River Canyon Drive and Oak Avenue including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, sound-walls, and all necessary appurtenances.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 15

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
. Purchase of water from San Juan Water District.
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Vear ZOzi.q/zS:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future I mprovement Proiects:
o Landscapereplacement.
o Tree replacement,
r Drainage cleanup.

THE RESIDENCES ATAMERICAN CANYON II
r lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turl ground cover, shrubs, and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signage and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment
Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
r Landscapereplacement.
o Tree replacement
o Drainage cleanup.

WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST AND WITLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2 . Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. o Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
o Oleander replacement on Blue Ravine Road frontage.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Two flow packages and master valve installation.
. Light pole replacement (three).
o Tree pruning.
o Landscape replacement on Oak Avenue.
o Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine Road.
o lrrigation controller upgrade (four controllers).
o Tree and landscape improvement or replacement.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lightihg Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportclrvBs 16

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City.
o Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, entry signage, drainage way, parks, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
o Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
pianned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r Year 3 tree pruning.
o New planting around replaced signs.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o Tree pruning.
o Wall repair on Oak Avenue.
r Tree replpcement.
r Silberhorn Drive landscape renovation.
o Turf renovation on Scholar Way.

WITLOW SPRINGS
o Purchase of electric power.
o Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25:
r No planned improvement projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
o LED retrofits (Contempo).

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS T7

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND BUDGETS
The Fiscal Year 2024/25 estimated costs of maintenance and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications of this Engineer's Report are summarized below. Refer to Section 7 - Budgets, for detailed budgets for each District.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report S31,538.12 s109,338.12American River Canyon North S77,8oo.oo so.oo L,380.20 5,880.20American River Canyon North No. 2 4,500.00 0.00 35,700.I2 577,904.79American River Canyon North No. 3 191,510.00 350,694.67

0.00 12,733.96 47,683,96Blue Ravine Oaks 28,950.00
50,000.00 2,024.05 74,404.05Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 22,380.00 7,650.00 20,!L4.76 125,597.76Briggs Ranch 97,833.00

0.00 58,1L8.21 404,4r8.21Broadstone 346,300.00

0.00 1,'1,,793.25 39,068.25Broadstone No, 3 27,275.00
25,000.00 10,954.03 257,359.03Broadstone No.4 22r,405.O0

0.00 13,158.87 62,957.87Cobble Hills lllReflections ll 49,799.O0 L3,287.OO 20,000.00 4,337.32 37,624.32Cobble Ridge
15,000.00 '1.4,894.75 44,884.75Folsom Heights 14,990.00 70,852.00 0.00 2,629.56 73,481..56Folsom Heights No. 2
27,037.00 0.00 12,939.50 39,976.50Hannaford Cross
27,558.00 0.00 3,669.23 31,,227.23Lake Natoma Shores
52,7L2.OO 23,000.00 6,937.77 82,649.77Los Cerros
221,494.O0 6,200.00 85,555,35 313,250.35Natoma Station
49,357.00 10,000.00 3,438.99 62,795.99Natoma Valley
74,OOO.OO 0.00 3,535.06 77,535.06Prairie Oaks Ranch
t75,626.0O 125,000.00 37,741..80 338,367.80Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 27,t95.00 0.00 3,902.35 31,097.35Prospect Ridge
23,656.00 0.00 2,825.74 26,48',J..74The Residences at American River Canyon 23,656.00 0.00 2,82r.75 26,477.75The Residences at American River Canyon ll L1,728.O0 0.00 2,355.08 14,083.08Sierra Estates
9,396.00 0.00 2,265.42 1,t,667.42Silverbrook
48,O29.6928,651.00 t2,8t2.OO 6,566.69Steeplechase
31,432.7r22,450.O0 0.00 8,982.7LWillow Creek Estates East 92,12I.7979,43L.OO 10,000.00 2,690.79Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 25,867.86 365,250.86Willow Creek Estates South 189,393.00 150,000.00

0.00 6,067.76 t6,tL7.76Willow Springs 10,050.00
$gos,gse.ez 5497,s42.0s 53,463,L69,72Total lmprovement Costs s2,22O,27t.OO lmprovement
Costs
Current Year
Projects
lncidental
Costs
Total
lmprovement
CostsDistrict
{*)NBS 18

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The following section of the Engineer's Report includes an explanation of the benefits to be derived from the installation, maintenance and servicing of the improvem'ents throughout the Districts, as well as a description of the assessment methodology used to apportion the total assessment to properties within each District.

Historical onnuol Engineels Reports were prepored by a different engineer of record ond specific languoge from those historical Engineer's Reports have been referenced to describe the Method of Apportionment within the following section of this report.

The Districts consist of all assessor parcels within the boundaries as defined by the Assessment Diagram included with this report. Further, all assessor parcels, including all privately and publicly owned parcels, are identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers listed within the included assessment levy roll. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based on the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the Districts over and above general benefits conferred on real property orto the public at large.

The apportionment of special benefit is a two-step process: the first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements, and the second step is to allocate the assessments to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property.

5.1 Discussion of Benefit
ln summary, the assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 ofthe Act states;
"The net dmount to be assessed upon londs within dn assessment district may be opportioned by ony formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount qmong oll assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimoted benefits to be received by each such lot or parcelfrom the improvements."
Proposition 2L8, as codified in Article Xlll D of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and the assessment must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional benefit upon the assessed parcel:
"No ossessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional speciol benefit canferred on that porcel.

The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential, commercial, industrial and other lots and parcels resulting from the improvements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These categories of special benefit are supported by various California legislation and supporting studies which describe the types of special benefit received by property from improvements such as those proposed by the Districts. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:
r Proximity to improved landscaped areas within each District. r Access to improved landscaped areas within each District City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportGtruBS 19

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
. lmproved views within each District.
o Extension of property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the improvements.
r Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the District and the services provided by the District, would not have been created.

The SVTA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties in three distinct areas: proximity, expanded or improved access, and views. The SVTA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel, and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SVTA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park improved by an assessment:

The chorocterizotion of a benefit moy depend on whether the parcel receives o direct odvontoge from the improvement (e.g. proximity to o park) or receives on indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.9. generol enhoncement of the district's property volues).

Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed above, further strengthen the basis ofthese assessments.

The special benefits from the improvements are further detailed below.

PROXIMITY TO IMPROVED LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE DISTRICT Only the specific properties within close proximity to the improvements are included in each District.

Therefore, property in each District enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the improvements that the public at large and property outside of each District do not share. ln absence of the assessments, the improvements would not be provided and the landscaping areas within each District would be degraded due to insufficient funding for maintenance, upkeep and repair.

Therefore, the assessments provide improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity and access enjoyed by parcels in the Districts, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property within each District. .ACCESS TO IMPROVED.TANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE DISTRICT Since the parcels in each District are the only parcels that enjoy close access to the improvements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas that are provided by the assessments. This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in that District.

IMPROVED VIEWS WITHIN THE DISTRICT
The Districts, by maintaining these landscaped areas, provides improved views to properties in each District. The properties in a District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the improvements. Therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon the property within each District.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 20

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

EXTENSION OF A PROPERTY'S OUTDOOR AREAS AND GREEN SPACES FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN CTOSE

PROXIMITY TO THE IMPROVEMENTS
ln large part, because it is generally cost prohibitive to provide large open land areas in development projects, the residential, commercial and other benefiting properties in each District do not have large outdoor areas and green spaces. The landscaped areas within each District provide additional outdoor areas that serve as an effective extension of the land area for properties that are in close proximity to the improvements. The imprbvements, therefore, provide an important, valuable and desirable extension of usable land area, which confers a direct advantage and special benefit to properties in close proximity to the improvements.

CREATION OF INDIVIDUAT LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAT AND COMMERCIAI USE THAT, IN ABSENCE OF THE

ASSESSMENTS, WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CREATED
Typically, the original owner/developer of the property within the Districts can petition the City to establish the assessment districts. As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through the Department of Real Estate "White Paper" reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. The purchase of property was also an "agreement" to pay the assessment. ln absence of the assessments, the lots within the Districts would probably not have been subdivided and created. These lots, and the improvements they support, are a special benefit to the property owners.

5.2 General versus Special Benefit
The assessments from the Districts are used to fund improvements and increased levels of maintenance to the grounds adjoining the properties in the Districts. ln absence of those Districts, such improvements would not be provided and the properties would not have been subdivided and improved to the same extent. The Districts were specifically proposed for formation to provide additional and improved improvements, and services in the Districts. ln absence of the assessments, these public resources could not be created and revenues would not be available for their continued maintenance and improvement.

Therefore, the assessments solely provide special benefit to property in the Districts over and above the general benefits conferred Uy itre general facilities of the City.

Although these improvements may be available to the general public at large because the Districts are accessible by members of the public, the improvements within each District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for property inside the Districts, and not the public at large. Other properties that are either outside the Districts or within the Districts and not assessed, do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. These improvements are of special benefit to properties located within the Districts because they provide a direct advantage to properties in the Districts that would not be provided in absence of the assessments.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 2L

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

5.3 Quantification of General Benefit
Although the analysis used to support these assessments concludes that the benefits are solely special, as described above, consideration is made forthe suggestion that a portion of the benefits ard general.

General benefits cannot be funded by District assessments and the funding must come from other sources.

The maintenance and servicing of the improvements is also partially funded, directly and indirectly from other sources including the City, the County of Sacramento and the State of California. This funding comes in the form of grants, development fees, special programs, and general funds, as well as direct maintenance and servicingof facilities (e.g. curbs, gutters, streets, drainage systems, and other infrastructure maintenance items such as pond clean outs and street sweeping, etc.). This funding from other sources more than compensates for general benefits, if any, received by the properties within the Districts.

STEP 1: CALCULATION OF THE GENERAL BENEFIT
The general benefits from the assessment may be quantified as illustrated in the following table.

Calculation of General Benefit {1}
Benefit Factor Relative Weight
General Benefit
Contribution
Relative General
Benefit
Creation of parcels
Multi-Family Residential
Commercial
90 o%
10%
20%

0.0 0.5
L.0
5 5
100
Total Calculated General Benefit

1.5 1.5%
(1) Per the historical Engineer's Report.

As a result, the City will contribute at least 1.5% of the total budget from sources other than the assessment. The contribution offsets any general benefits from the assessment services.

STEP 2: CATCULATION OF CURRENT GENERAL BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION FROM CITY Pursuant to the prior Engineer's Report, the overall general benefit contribution is the sum of the following components:

The City owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Districts improvements. This curb and gutter maintenance serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the City toward general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the cur:b gutter is conservatively estimated Io be Lo/o.

The City owns and maintains storm drainage systems along the border of the Districts improvements. This system serves to prevent flooding and associated damage to the improvements, and manage urban runoff, including local pollutants loading from the improvements. The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance, and operation of the local storm drainage systems is conservatively estimated to be 1%.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 22

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

The City owns and maintains local public streets along the border of the Districts improvements. These public streets provide access to the improvements for its enjoyment as well as efficient maintenance. The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance of local public streets is conservatively estimated to contribute 1%.

The improvements were constructed by the original owner/developer(s) as a condition of development.

The value of the construction of the improvements can be quantified and monetized as an annuity. Since this construction was performed and paid by non-assessment funds, this "annuity" can be used to offset general benefit costs and is conservatively estimated to contribute25%.

Therefore, the total general benefit that is conservatively quantified att.5% is more than offset by the total non-assessment contribution towards general benefit of 28%'

5.4 Method of Apportionment
The second step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property.

This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE). This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are assigned a SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling which is assigned one SFE.

5.5 Assessment Apportionment
The improved properties within the Districts consist primarily of single family, multi-family, commercial and non-assessed parcels, with the vast majority being single family parcels. Since all single family parcels in the Districts are deemed to have good proximity to the improvements, such single family properties receive similar benefit from the proposed improvements and are assigned 1-.0 SFE unit. The special benefit assignment for other types of properties is further defined as follows' Many of the Districts contain only single family residences and non-assessed properties such as parks and green spaces. These Districts are:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report r,o22American River Canyon North
150American River Canyon North No. 2
L,022American River Canyon North No. 3t1)
165Blue Ravine Oaks
15sBlue Ravine Oaks ll
389Cobble Hills Ridge lll Reflections ll
98Cobble Ridge
308Folsom Heights
308Folsom Heights No. 2
103Hannaford Cross
Residential LotsDistrict
QIVBS 23

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
113Lake Natoma Shores
337Los Cerros
79Natoma Valley
35Prospect Ridge
25Sierra Estates
154Steeplechase
17The Residences at American River Canyon
10The Residences at American River Canyon ll
747Willow Creek East
747Willow Creek East No. 2(2)
5L7Willow Springs
Residential LotsDistrict
(1) See the American River Canyon No. 3 section below for further information on zones of benefit.
(2) See the Willow Creek East No. 2 section below for further information on zones of benefit.

Single family residential properties in the aforementioned Districts are assigned L.0 SFE per parcel and condominiums are assigned 0.67 SFEs per residential unit. District properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:
(1) ln 2006/07, a general case SFE rate was established for condominiums in Districts in which the original Engineer's Report did not anticipate 'condominium development. The rate is 0.67 SFEs per residential unit.

AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.3
There are L,022 residential lots in American River Canyon North No. 3. Each assessable parcel receives a special and direct benefit from the improvements in the District. Since the District is comprised of residential single family improved properties and all properties have good proximity to the improvements, all assessable parcels are estimated to benefit equally from the improvements associated with American River Canyon North No. 3, and the costs associated with the improvements are apportioned equally to all parcels on the basis of current or proposed dwelling units. Each parcel is assigned SFE units relative to the number of current or proposed dwelling units on the parcel.

There are three Zones of Benefit within American River Canyon North District No. 3. ln Zone A each single family parcel is assigned 1.00 SFE, in Zone B, each single family parcel is assigned 0.83 SFE, and in Zone C each single family parcel is assigned 0.50 SFE. Properties in Zone B and Zone C receive lower benefit units because they currently pay for common open space areas within their zone. ln2OO7, when the American River Canyon North District No. 3 was formed, an analysis of the associated landscaping improvements was performed to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment, lt was estimated that City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
Condominiur{t) (per unit) 0.6700

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g, open space, park land, etc.)
Description SFEs
QNBs 24

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Zone B receives 83% ol the special benefit, and Zone C receives 50% of the special benefit. Therefore, the SFE units for Zone B and Zone C have been adjusted accordingly. American River Canyon North District No, 3 properties are assessed per the table below:

American River Canyon No. 3

BRIGGS RANCH
There are 542 residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE, Non-residential parcels within Briggs Ranch (APNs: 071-1190-007 , -OO8, -OtO, -0I2, -013, and -014) are assigned 2.20 SFEs per acre, per the original formation documents. Briggs Ranch properties are assessed per the table below:

Briggs Ranch

BROADSTONE
According to the Method of Spread in Broadstone's original formation documents, there were 895.301 original acres in Broadstone. Of this original acreage, 4t6.t45 acres subdivided into 1,530 single family residential lots (average of 4.2 lots per acre) and 479.1,56 acres divided into multi-family and commercial lots. The multi-family parcels are designated into two development areas; Bentley Square West and Bentley Square East. Bentley Square West (APNs O72-L07O-OO2-0000 through APN 072-1070-100-0000) includes 99 units and Bentley Square East (APNs 072-1510-00L-0000 through APN 072-16L0-053-0000) includes 53 units. The 152 Bentley Square units are each assigned 0.096 SFEs per unit. Due to the small lot density being consistent with the multi-family land use designation, the Vessona and Halidon developments are considered condominiums. These projects are consistent with both the Multi-Family Low Density General Plan Land Use Designation and the Multi-Family zoning of the project site, Parcels within the Vessona and Halidon developments are assigned 0.67 SFEs per unit.

There are 1,530 single family residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE. Developed non- single family parcels within Broadstone are assigned 2.10 SFEs per acre, unrecorded single family residential lots are assigned 0.65 SFEs per parcel, and undeveloped non-single family residential parcels are assigned 0.704 SFEs per acre. Broadstone properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024125 Engineer's Report

1.0000Zone A - Original American River Canyon North Area (per parcel)

0.8300Zone B - Canyon Falls Village Area (per parcel)

0.s000Zone C - American River Canyon North No, 2 Area (per parcel)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g, open space, park land, etc.)
Description SFEs

1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)

2.2000Non-Residential Parcel (per acre)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
islNBs 25

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Broadstone
BROADSTONE NO.3
According to the Method of Spread in Broadstone No, 3's original formation documents there were 559.36 acres in Broadstone No. 3. Of this acreage, 325.00 acres are single family residential lots (average of 2.034 lots per acrel,2O7.43 acres are industrial, commercial and other uses, and 25.93 acres are non-assessed for use as parks, open space, etc.

There are 548 single family residential lots and each residential lot is assigned 1.00 SFE. Developed non- single family parcels within Broadstone No. 3 are assigned 2.034 SFEs per acre, unrecorded single family residential lots are assigned 0.326 SFEs per parcel, and undeveloped non-single family residential parcels are assigned 0.653 SFEs per acre. Broadstone No. 3 properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Broadstone No.3
BROADSTONE NO.4
Residential
Certain residential properties in Broadstone No. 4 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned one 1.00 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. lf there is more than one single family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.00 SFE per single family detached dwelling.

Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report Single Family Parcel (per parcel) 1.0000
Unrecorded Single Family Parcel (per parcel) 0.5500

0.0950Bentley Square Multi-Family Parcel (per parcel)
Vessona and Halidon Condominium (per unit) 0.6700

2.1000Developed Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre)
Undeveloped Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre) o.7040

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel (per parcel) 1.0000

0.3250Unrecorded Single Family Parcel (per parcel)
Developed Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre) 2.0340
Undeveloped Non-Single Family Parcel (per acre) 0,5530
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Description SFEs
QNBS 26

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Broadstone No. 4, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties.

Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.91. persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.12 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.91' people on average for a single family residence and 2.I2 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit.

A similar calculation is used for the SFE assignments for other residential property types. Broadstone No. 4 residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Broadstone No. 4 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units'
Commercial/lndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property.

The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties' ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study {SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2,91. Since the average lot size for a single family home in Broadstone No. 4 is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.

The employee density per acre is generally 1.65 times the population density of single family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 14.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefitto commercial/ industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

1.00 1.00 1.0000Single Family Residential

0.5s 0.4000o.73Condominium
o.64 o.42 o.2tooDuplex, Triplex, Fourplex

0.64 0.34 0.2200Multi-Family Residential (5+ Units;ttt
,0.45 0.20000.45Mobile Home on Separate Lot
of Residential Property
SqFt
Factor
SFE
FactorE uivalent
Pop. Density
QNBS 27

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category' Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres. lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Broadstone No. 4 non-residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Broadstone No. 4 Commercial/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (1) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above.

Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75/o are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 24 0.500 0.5000Commercial
'1..420 1..4200Office 68
24 0.500 0.5000Shopping Center
L 0.021 N/ASelf Storage or Parking Lot
N/A0.80 0.033Golf Course

0.10 0.004 N/ACemeteries
.0002 N/A0.05Agriculture
Type of Commercial/l ndustrial
Property
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre(1)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5
r}NBS 28

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not geneiate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Other property land uses in Broadstone No. 4 are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Broadstone No. 4 Other Property Assessment Factors
Zones of Benefit
ln 2015, when Broadstone No. 4 was formed, an analysis was performed of the associated lighting and landscaping improvements to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. As a result, four Zones of Benefit were created within Broadstone No. 4. Parcels in Zone B are determined to receive 95.25% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 93j7% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, and parcels in Zone D are determined to receive 92.23% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A.

NATOMA STATION
There are L,272 single family residential lots within Natoma Station and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. Condominium parcels are assigned 0.67 SFEs per unit, multi-family parcels are assigned 3.2337 SFEs per acre, commercial properties located outside of Lot X are assigned 4.2487 SFEs per acre, commercial properties within Lot X are assigned 0.6299 SFEs per parcel. Natoma Station properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Natoma Station
(1) lncludes APNs: 072-0840-045, -047 and a portion of -057.

PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH
There are 856 single family residential lots within Prairie Oaks Ranch and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. The one multi-family property is assigned 57.0 SFEs and the school site is assigned 5.53 SFEs to pay for City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

0.2500Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
L.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)

0.6700Condominium Parcel (per unit)

3.2337Multi-Family Parcel (per acre)

4.2487Commercial Parcel Excluding Lot X (per acre)

0.6299Lot X Commercial Parcel(1)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription
QruBS 29

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
the cost of maintaining the school sites' frontage. Prairie Oaks Ranch properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Prairie Oaks Ranch
PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO.2
Residential
Certain residential properties in Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned 1.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single-family residential property. lf there is more than one single-family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.0 SFE per single-family detached dwelling' Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single- family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single-family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit.

The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2019 ACS 5 Year estimate and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.66 persons occupy each single-family residence, whereas an average of L,94 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.65 people on average for a single-family residence and L.94 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums, Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.42 per dwelling unit. Should ADUs be developed within Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, the assessment would be 1 SFE for the primary SFR and O.42for the ADU. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types. Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

1.0000Single Family Parcel (per parcel)

57.0000Multi-Family Parcel (per parcel)
s.5300School Site Parcel (per parcel)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs
CTwBS .30

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units.

Commercial/l ndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single-family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property.

The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties. ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land. area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, Census data shows that the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.66. Since the average lot size for a single-family home in Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 13.30.

The employee density per acre is generally 1.80 times the population density of single-family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 13.30 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating beneiit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between L resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating corhmercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category, Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres. lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 non- residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

1.0000Single Family Residential 1.00 1.00

0.73 0.s8 0.4200Condominium

0.42 0.3200Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex o.77

0.72 0,30 o.2200Multi-Family Residential (5+ Units;{tr

0.58 0.43 0.2500Mobile Home on Separate Lot
Type of Residential
Pop. Density
Equivalent
SqFt
Factor
SFE
Factor
CINBS 31

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Commercial/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (1) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above.

Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An.analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property, Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment, All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed
Other property land uses in Prairie Oaks No. 2 are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 24 0.s00 0.5000Commercial
68 r.420 1..4200Office

0.5000Shopping Center 24 0.500
t 0.02r N/ASelf Storage or Parking Lot
N/AGolf Course 0.80 0.033

0.10 0.004 N/ACemeteries

0.002 N/AAgriculture 0.05
Type of CommerciaUln{ustrial
Property
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre(1)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5
QNBS ?2

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Other Property Assessment Factors

SILVERBROOK
The non-residential properties in Silverbrook are assigned 1.0 SFE per acre and the remaining 273 single family residential lots within Silverbrook are assigned 0.1259 SFEs per residential lot. Silverbrook properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Silverbrook
(1) Based on 34.39 acres that developed into 273 single family parcels.

WITLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO.2
Residential
Certain residential properties in Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned 1.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single-family residential property. lf there is more than one single-family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged 1.0 SFE per single-family detached dwelling.

Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single- family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single-family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit.

The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing Willow Creek Estates East No. 2,'as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.97 persons occupy each single-family residence, whereas an average of 2.I2 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2SI people on average for a single:family residence and 2.12 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types. Willow Creek Estates East No.2 residential properties are assessed perthe original formation documents, perthe table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel) 0.2500

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
SFEsDescription

1.0000Non-Residential Parcel (per acre)
Single Family Parcel (per parcel)(1) 0.1259

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs
CINBS 33

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Residential Density and Assessment Factors (1) Properties in excess of 20 units are assessed 0.22 SFEs per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFEs per each additional unit in excess of 20 units.

Commercial/lndustrial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single-family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property.

The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties. ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (SANDAG Study) are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. ln comparison, Census data shows that the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.91 Since the average lot size for a single-family home in Prospect Ridge is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.

The employee density per acre is generally 1.65 times the population density of single-family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 14.55 residents per acre), Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with L resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between L resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. The table below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category.

Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for comme.rcial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres, lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate. Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 non- residential properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

1.00001.00 1.00Single Family Residential
o.73 0.s5 0,4000Condominium

0.42 o.2700o.64Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex
o.64 0.34 0.2200Multi-Family Residential (5+ Unit5lttt

0.45 0.20000.45Mobile Home on Separate Lot
of Residential Property
Pop. Density
Equivalent
SqFt
Factor
SFE
Factor
I}NBs 34

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Commercial/lndustrial Density and Assessment Factors (1) The SFE factors are applied by the quarter acre of land area or portion thereof. Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE units listed above.

Undeveloped/Vacant
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel' Other
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Other property land uses in Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - iiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report 24 0.s00 0.5000Commercial
t.420058 1.420Office
24 0.500 0.5000Shopping Center

0.02L N/ALSelf Storage or Parking Lot

0.80 0.033 N/AGolf Course

0.004 N/A0.10Cemeteries
N/A0.05 0.002Agriculture
Average
Employees
Per Acre
SFE Units
Per
Quarter Acre{t)
SFE Units
Per
Acre After 5Commercia
Type of
ustrial Property
(3INBS 35

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 Other Property Assessment Factors Zones of Benefit
As part of the engineering work for this assessment, an analysis was conducted on the relationship (including proximity, level of service, etc,), between properties and the primary improvements located throughout Willow Creek Estates East No. 2. Parcels in Zone A (on Garrett Drive, Ferrera Drive and Whitmer Drive) receive direct special benefit from the proximate landscaping and trees adjacent to the properties as well as less proximate streetlighting, Parcels in Zone B receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting as well as landscaping particularly along the street entrances into the neighborhood. Parcels in Zone C receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting but less benefit from the landscaping because they are less proximate to the landscaped areas.

Thus, three zones (A, B, and C) were created. Parcels in Zone A are determined to receive same level of the level of special benefit of those within Zone B and parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 9L92% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A and Zone B.

WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH
There are 1,101 single family residential lots within Willow Creek Estates South's Villages 1, 2, 3 (lots 1-40 and 94-154), 4 through 7, and 9A and each residential lot is assigned 1.0 SFE. There are 243 single family residential lbts in Villages 8, 9b and 9c and each residential lot is assigned 1.086 SFEs. There are 64 single family residential lots in Village 3 (lots 41-93 and L55-165) and each one is assigned 1.256 SFEs.

Additionally, there are L3 Lexington Business Park parcels assigned 0,518 SFEs per parcel and three Lexington Square parcels assigned 2.4710 SFEs per parcel. Willow Creek Estates South properties are assessed per the original formation documents, per the table below:

Willow Creek Estates South
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report

0.2500Undeveloped/Vacant Parcel (per parcel)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.)
Description SFEs

1.0000Single Family ParcelVillages!,2,3 (Lots 1-40 and 94-L541, 4 through 7, and 9A (per parcel)

1.0850Single Family Parcel Villages 8, 9b and 9c (per parcel)

1.2560Single Family Parcel Village 3 (lots 4L-93 and 155-165) (per parcel)

0.5180Lexington Business Park Parcel (per parcel)

2.47L0Lexington Square Parcel (per parcel)

0.0000Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land, etc.)
Description SFEs
CINBS 36

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

FIELDSTONE MEADOWS
On April 9,20L3 by Resolution No. 9137, the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District was dissolved. The City will no longer be responsible for maintaining the improvements nor providing services within the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District.

5.5 Maximum Assessment lncrease
Annually, the maximum assessment rates for Broadstone No. 3 and Cobble Ridge are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with no maximum annual adjustment.

The maximum assessment rates for Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, and Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 4%, The maximum assessment rates for American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Broadstone No. 4, Folsom Heights No. 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Bay Area as of December of each succeeding year, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 3%.

Any change in the Consumer Price lndex in excess of the maximum annual assessment increase shall be cumulatively reserved as the "Unused CPl" and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than 4% for Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon ll, and Willow Creek Estates East No. 2. The "Unused CPl" shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than3% forAmerican River Canyon North No.3, Blue Ravine Oaks No.2, Broadstone No. 4, Folsom Heights No. 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2.

5.7 Fiscal Year 2O24/25 Maximum Assessment
The Fiscal Year 2024/25 maximum authorized and proposed assessment rates are shown below City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's Report No lnflators102,94 s1o2.s4American River Canyon North
No lnflator77.70 77.70American River Canyon North No. 2 312.96 CPI NTE 3%312.96American River Canyon North No. 3 218.60 No lnflator218.60Blue Ravine Oaks
L10.92 CPI NTE 3%110.93Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
122.28 No lnflatorBriggs Ranch L22.28
154.98 No lnflatorBroadstone 164.99

41.97 4r.90 cPtBroadstone No. 3

42.40 42.40 CPI NTE 3%Broadstone No. 4-Zone A

40.39 40.38 CPI NTE 3%Broadstone No,4-Zone B
FY ZO24l2s
Maximum
Authorized Rate
tY 2024l2s
Proposed Rate
Maximum
Assessment
lnflatorDistrict
CINBS 37

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

39.81 39.80 CPI NTE 3%Broadstone No, 4-Zone C

39.0s 39.04 CPI NTE 3%Broadstone No. 4-Zone D
tr3.L4 L13.r4 No lnflatorCobble Hills ll/Reflections ll 257.82 191.96 cPtCobble Ridge

70.88 70.88 No lnflatorFolsom Heights
241.59 238.56 CPI NTE 3%Folsom Heights No. 2
195.78 195.78 No lnflatorHannaford Cross
183.58 138.16 No lnflatorLake Natoma Shores
r2r.t8 r2r.78 No lnflatorLos Cerros
9t.7L 97.70 No lnflatorNatoma Station
1,050,02 397.44 CPI NTE 4%Natoma Valley
2r3.61. 213.60 No lnflatorPrairie Oaks Ranch
343.01 343.00 CPI NTE 3%Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
'1,,317.45 !,317.44 CPI NTE 4%Prospect Ridge
445.9r 445.90 CPI NTE 4%Sierra Estates
132.32 132.27 No lnflatorSilverbrook
157.58 157.68 No lnflatorSteeplechase
755.55 755.55 CPI NTE 4%The Residences at American River Canyon 1,569.23 1,569.22 CPI NTE 4%The Residences at American River Canyon ll

80.40 80.40 No lnflatorWillow Creek Estates East
L1.7.69 111.68 CPI NTE 4%Willow Creek'Estates No. 2-Zone A&B 102.67 L02.62 CPI NTE 4%Willow Creek Estates No. 2-Zone C No lnflatorL09.88 109.88Willow Creek Estates South

28.r4 28.t4 No lnflatorWillow Springs
FY 2024l2s
Maximum
Authorized Rate
FY 2O24/2s
Proposed Rate
Maximum
Assessment
lnflatorDistrict
Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the cost estimate and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per benefit point will be based on the estimated costs, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and operational condition. The actual assessment amount may be equal to or lower than the maximum allowable assessmenq however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 38

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

6. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of the Districts are displayed on the following Assessment Diagram. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Districts are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Sacramento, at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report' ti
,
Hb lu
kil
!mI
j-r
-.ffi
're I
i
{&hrd$
g6
&
E'
'!
ht*rt5'rrtrlll.
tder!9r
Csrn h ]
^^,NORTH
F[E! Alt€ ffry€ ff T* Cfri CiSidf lrE
erlrrdr tgtoU B!Ir S 6dRn&la
d[f,&rtrTB* -.... _ {*v F
-- *_* -,_-- d!?
RiCOhru.r Iddraf S l* crlYraEFi
* ;hEcfl r 6 a*y! 6Mrr 4a 3{ta!!alo
4&rrsKd.ld ._,,, !a!s
lffiE e nc*ltdtl *rt l@ ff! d 6*!
8r :E {i+C9r4 d l$irri F f hh* wlolB ffi96 ffi!nq*!{f LM*Ee Mts$o@*id_*- __ &r*, --_*.,_# ts Fd& rEd dr * @&Oltcf ,trato&M tE i*lqfrtiMrfi4Ftu vB&FIEO&ldfFr€., !E t&tr &dfi 4 rd oMlt6 5adffil8a lE .*_ - . kr d :E riafiat;tr-s #f itY lrM r+ eoltaffioda!ffilFcsrs t4mT4&rLT*i#:gi6$Dirylt@Pe{idlS iei!ft--
f4r! 116 ur Fdi. a: IHE haeff __*_-6us.
__ u a tH! f!4{f T* l&NtlrfrTs ?# rf glrtt ! r uruiT/-:q1*& C lxffn^ 11 t* ErS:T f hE ffftilD3lt1sg 16 i'!r slDl*
i-tui;7t;+iiFrfi;;i;F geriirerru
ar*Srtu S;
Eaa&Ht Eaftrw:! 7f wNFEr
(&Ti S g€rulr! I fi a Elil,t! Ct-nFT{q f
u 445*gMs& f *1 Fda€ll hffB*tri r*E @ sid &'a{r t* !r {T^i! M&& Itr LS3 N&ddrh9 i9 traiF&E6
aqPas{! *Brf,fo u w #s 6r rlt
Blr*:trf *aEaaoe9!Fdelr tWfi
ctw oF FoLsoM
L.ANDSCAPING AIID LIGHTI}IG ASSESS}IENT D}STRICTS
ASSESSIII EI{T DI,AO RAIII
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportQrNBS 39

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
7 BUDGETS
The Fiscal Year 2024/25 budgets for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in Section 3 - Plans and Specifications of this report are shown below.

G ENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS
o Scheduled: monthly landscape maintenance and service. o Unscheduled: unscheduled but potential costs for repairs (i.e. broken sprinklers and irrigation systems), replacements (i.e. remove and replace dead tree or irrigation controller), and other services (i.e. repair fence post or treat for a specific pest) not included in monthly maintenance and service costs.
o Streetlights: repair and replace bulbs and ballasts in streetlights.

SERVICE COSTS
o Electrical: electric costs for streetlight maintenance and power to irrigation controllers. r Water: water costs to irrigate landscaping.

CURRENT YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Funded capital improvements planned to occur in the upcoming fiscal year.

INCIDENTAL COSTS
r Professional Services: consultant cost for Engineer's Report and lmprovement Plan. r Contract Services: other contracts or professional services such as backflow testing (yearly tests), vector control, graffiti removal, and streetlight pole replacement. r Publications/Mailings/Communications: yearly notices in public hearings, mailings to Advisory Committee Members, and telephone expenses.
o Staff: Landscaping and Lighting District Manager and/or inspector, clerical support, and/or other city staff,
r Overhead: General overhead (Districts share of general overhead categories such as City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager, etc.) and Department overhead (Districts share of department overhead categories such as City Attorney, City Clerk and Finance Dept, Costs). o County Auditor Fee: Per Parcel Fee charged by County to put levy on tax bills.

TOTAT I MPROVEMENT COSTS
This is the total of all improvement costs budgeted for the upcoming year. This cost includes current improvements that are funded by fund balance monies. Fund balance monies are monies that have been collected in prior years in anticipation of being used for specific improvements and/or intended for replacement or improvement of capital items within a district.

RESERVE FUND COLLECTTON / (CONTRTBUTION)
This item includes the amount to be collected from or credited to the annual assessment. When the total lmprovement Costs exceed the total maximum assessment revenue to be collected, and there are sufficient City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 40

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
reserves, a credit may be applied to the total annual costs. When the total lmprovement Costs are less than the total maximum assessment revenue, an amount may be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year; or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessment collections from the County, whichever is later.

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER SOURCES
This item includes any amount contributed to the District from any source of funds other than the annual assessments.

ROUNDING ADJUSTMENT
This item includes any amount necessary to round the actual assessment amount for each parcel to an even cent as the County requires that the total levy amount submitted be even so that the amount can be divided into two equal installments on the tax roll.

BALANCE TO ASSESS DISTRICT PROPERTIES
This calculation takes the number of single-family equivalent benefit units and multiplies it by the amount that each property within a district will be assessed for the upcoming year. This is the total assessment amount that will be generated by the properties within each district.

RESERVE FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS
This calculation determines funds available in a district. This calculation includes the included funds remaining after being allocated to the estimated reserves, short-term installments and long-term installments.

ESTIMATED RESERVES
Estimated reserve needed for the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessment collections from the County, whichever is later.

SHORT.TERM INSTALLMENTS
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements ' projected to be completed within the next five years.

LONG.TERM INSTALLMENTS
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within five to thirty years'
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer's ReportCINBS 47

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

American River Canyon North
FiscalYear 2024125 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:

General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled .

Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No Planned lmprovement Projects
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:

Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:

Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:

Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30, 2024)
Estimated Reserve (through December 37,2024)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance {June 30, 2025)
Installment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total Installment Costs
So.oo

0.00 18,000.00
5,650.00
20,750.00
33,400.00

0.00 S77,8oo.oo
s1,ooo.oo

0.00 0.00
26,916.58
3,014.00
607.54
Sgt,sgg.tz
$109,338.12
105,204.68
(4,733.44)

0.00 s105,204.58
s102.94
Stoz.g+
r,o22
!,022.0O
(s167,285.99)
(72,892.08)
(s9,022.00)
(s299,200.07)

0.00 (4,133.441
(s303,333.51)
So.oo
s3,762.00

0.00 5,250.00
$s9,ozz.oo

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
None
Short Term Installment Summary Totals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
Projest
Waterfall Pond Liner
Waterfall Pumps, Autofill, Filters, Chlorination System Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:
lnstallment Summary
American River Canyon North
2024-25
Yearly
lnstallment
Prior Years
Csllections
Year 1
2024
so
Year tr
20tr8
s3,333
s2,5oo
Year 2
m25
Years2-5
20L9-2m2
513,333
slo,ooo
Year 3
mz6
Years 5-10
2023-20/27
S11,o4o
512,500
Yea.r4
2(,'27
Vears il'-Zo
2028-2s37
527,'se
Szs,ooo
Year 5
2m8
Years 2O-iX)
203A-20p.7
527,s99
s25,oo0
Approx"
ToaLRiquired
So
' Approc
Total Required
Sloo,ooo
s75,000
so $o $o so so 5o
Yearly
lnstallment
52,760
s2,soo
Prior Years
Collections
533,762
Szo,ooo
s5,250 553,752 s5,833 s23,333 s23,540 $SZ,Sgg s52,599 S175,ooo

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

American River Canyon North No. 2
FiscalYear 2024125 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:

General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No Planned lmprovement Projects
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:

Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:

Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:

Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2024)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3I,2024)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30, 2025)
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan {Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
So.oo

0.00 4,000.00
N/A
s00.00

0.00 0.00
s4,500.00
s1,ooo.oo

0.00 0.00

0.00 264.0O
tL6.20
s1,380.20
Ss,88o.20
t2,432.O0
6,551.80

0.00 Stz,4g2.oo
577.7o
577.7O
150
160.00
S1.88,021.62
(3,920.13)
l2L4.O79.OOl
(s29,977.51)

0.00 6,551.80
1s23,425.711
So.oo
208,355.00

0.00 5,724.O0
s2L4,O79.OO

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
Proiect
Paint Light Poles (Approximately 250 Poles)
Pole Replacement
Long Term Installment Summary Totals:
lnstallment Summary
American River Canyon North No. 2
2024-25
Yearly
lnstallment
Prior Years
Collections
Year 1
2024
Year 1
20ts
Sg,ggg
58,ooo
Year 2
2025
Years 2-5
201l -20?2
s13,333
s32,ooo
Year 3
2026
Years $10
2023-2A27
S4,836
5?'2,335
Year 4
2427
Years 10-20
2028-2037
S9,455
547,782
Year 5
2028
Years 2G30
m38-2047
S9,455
s47,782
Approx.

Total Required
So
Approx.

Total Required
sL00,000
S24o,ooo
So
Yearly
lnstallment
5e4s
s4,778
So
Prior Years
Collections
Sts,zsq
S130,101
so so $o so $o
55,724 5208,355 511,333 545,333 S27,L7t 557,237 SSl,Zgt S34o,ooo

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

American River Canyon North No. 3
FiscalYear 2024125 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:

General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Oak Avenue and American River Canyon Drive turf replacement, East Side or American River Canyon Drive turf replacement, Ladder fuel removal in open spaces Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:

Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:

Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:

Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2024)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,20241
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance {June 30, 2025)
lnstallment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
S113,610.00
73,000.00

0.00 4,500.00
400.00

0.00 350,694.67
5s42,204.67
s1,ooo.oo

0.00 0.00
26,916.58
7,L76.4O
607.54
S35,zoo.tz
s577,904.79
287,785.92
(290,r78.871,

0.00 5287,785.92
s312.e6
s312.96
7,O22
919.56
sL,L72,543.93
(L51,473.4t')
(938,19s.00)
s82,875.52

0.00 (290.118.87)
(s207,243.35)
s63,ooo.oo
494,000.00
359,695.00
21,500.00
s938,195.00Page 176
07/23/2024 Item No.9.

District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
lrrigation Controller Upgrade - Centralized (3 controllers) Signage Replacement
Oak and ARC Drive Turf Replacement
East Side or ARC Drive Turf Replacement
Ladder Fuel Removal in open Spaces
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Long Term Installment Summary
Project
Waterfall Rock Repair
Baldwin Dam Path Repair
Tree and Landscape lmprovements / Replacements
ARC Drive / Canyon Falls (Cascade Perimeter) Landscape Remove / Replace Trees
Main Walk Trail Landscaping, lrrigation, Stair, and Clean-up Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Installment Summary
American River Canyon North No. 3
2024-25
Yearly
lnstallment
s3,2oo
ss,8oo
so
so
so
Sg,ooo
Prior Years
Collections
S32,ooo
Sgr,ooo
so
So
So
s53,000
Year 1
2024
Ss,zoo
55,800
s1ss,846
s182,348
512,soo
s359,695
Year 1
2018
s1,ooo
ss,ooo
Ss,ooo
Year 2
2025
s3,2oo
ss,8oo
so
5o
So
S9,ooo
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
s4,000
s20,0oo
Szo,ooo
Year 3
2026
s3,200
$s,soo
So
5o
5o
s9,ooo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
s10,333
s47,soo
s3e,167
Year 4
2027
s3,2oo
ss,8oo
So
So
So
Sg,ooo
Years 10-20
2028-2037
523,333
S1o6,2so
58s,477
Year 5
2028
Ss,zoo
Ss,eoo
5o
So
So
s9,ooo
Approx.

Total Required
s48,ooo
s6o,ooo
S15s,846
S182,348
s12,soo
s458,695
Yearly
lnstallment
s2,333
Sro,ozs
Se,s+z
Prior Years
Collections
s1e,000
Sgs,ooo
sss,ooo
s135,000
Slso,ooo
5494,ooo
Years 20-30
2038-2047
S23,333
Sroe,zso
S8s,4t7
Approx.

Total Required
sTs,ooo
s3so,ooo
S3oo,ooo
So
So
So
So
So
5o
S2,ooo
Slo,ooo
s23,000
s8,000
S40,ooo
s92,ooo
Sz,ooo
510,ooo
S1o9,ooo
s13s,oo0
slso,ooo
S1,o1o,oooS21,soo s215,0005215,000

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Blue Ravine Oaks
FiscalYear 2024125 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:

General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
No Planned lmprovement Projects
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:

Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:

Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:

Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2024)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3'J', 2024)
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30, 2025)
Installment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term I nsta I I ment Pla n (Previously Col lected) Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
so.oo
15,000.00

0.00 1,000.00
4,000.00
8,950.00

0.00 $28,950.00
S1,ooo.oo

0.00 0.00
Lr,L22.91.
492.00
119.05
s12,733.96
$41,683.96
36,059.00
{5,514.96)

0.00 $3G,069.00
s218.50
S21s.60
165
165.00
St+z,otz.+a
(27,789.3r)
(67,708.00)
$46,515.15

0.00 (5,614.96)
s40,900.19
so.oo
65,000.00

0.00 2,708.00
s67,708.00

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
. Project
None
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Blue Ravine Wall Repair
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Blue Ravine Oaks
2024-25
Yearly
lnstallment
Prior Years
Collections
Year 1
2024
Year 1
2018
$5,ooo
Year 2
'2025
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
S5o,ooo
Year 3
2U26
Years 5-10
2023-2427
Srs,ass
Year 4
2027
Years 10-20
2A2,8-2037
Szz,osE
Year 5
2028
Years 20-30
2038-2047
527,083
Approx.

Total Required
so
Approx.

Total Required
sL3o,ooo
so so so$o so so so
Yearly
lnstallment
52,708
Prior Years
Collections
Sss,ooo
52,708 56S,OOO SS,OOO 550,000 515,833 SZZ,Ogg 527,083 S13o,ooo

07/23/2024 Item No.9.

Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
FiscalYear 2024125 Cost Estimate
lmprovement Costs:

General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlights
lrrigation
Service Costs
Electrical
Water
Current Year lmprovement Proiects
Turf Renovation Timson Drive and Riley Street
Subtotal:
lncidental Costs:

Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
Contract Services (All Other Contracts and Services)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
Overhead
County Auditor Fee
Subtotal:

Total lmprovement Costs
Total Maximum Assessment Revenue
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Rounding Adjustments
Balance to Assess to District Properties
Actual Assessment per SFE
Maximum Assessment per SFE
Parcels Levied
SFE Benefit Units
Reserve Fund Balance Analysis:

Beginning Reserve Fund Balance (April 30,2024)
Estimated Reserve (through December 3L,2024l,
lnstallment Costs Reserve
Net Available Fund Balance
Contributions from Other Sources
Reserve Fund Collection / (Contribution)
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance (June 30,20251
Installment Costs (see installment Plan and Summary next page) Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Previously Collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (Collected this Year)
Total lnstallment Costs
s22,o8o.oo

0.00 300.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 50,000.00
$72,380.00
s1,000.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 905.00
119.05
52,024.O5
574,404.05
18,303.45
(56,100.60)
(1.5s)
$18,301.80
S110.92
$rro.gg
165
155.00
stLt,94O.29
(L6,269.37)
(120,263.00)
($24,592.08)
(566.60)
(ss,434.00)
(s80,692.68)
s8,ooo.oo
29,400.00
77,400.00
5,463.00
s120,263.00

07/23/2024 Item No.9.
lnstallment Summary
District
Fiscal Year
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Tree Removal/ Replacement (Blue Ravine Road)
Turf Renovation Timson and Riley
Turf Renovation Hazelmere and Riley
Turf Renovation Between Hazelmere and Timson
Short Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Long Term lnstallment Summary
Project
Fence Replacement on Riley Street
Tree Removal / Replacement
Signage Replacement
Long Term lnstallment Summary Totals:

Blue Ravine Oaks No.2
2024-25
Yearly
lnstallment
s5,4oo
So
S6,ooo
s16,000
527,4OO
Prior Years
Collections
s8,ooo
So
so
$o
S8,ooo
Year 1
2024
S5,40o
s5o,ooo
s5,ooo
s15,ooo
577,4oo
Year 1
2018
S1,2oo
s2,soo
ssoo
Year 2
2025
s5,40o
so
s6,ooo
St-6,ooo
S27,4oo
Years 2-5
20t9-2022
s1,200
Sz,soo
Ssoo
Year 3
2026
ss,4oo
So
So,ooo
516,ooo
527,4oo
Years 5-10
2023-2027
s10,633
SLz,st7
s1,000
Year 4
2027
s5,4oo
So
so,ooo
$16,ooo
S2z,4oo
Yearc 10-20
2028-2037
Szs,sss
526,042
So
Year 5
2028
s5,4oo
5o
s6,ooo
S16,000
527,4OO
Approx.

Total Required
s3s,ooo
s5o,ooo
s3o,ooo
580,ooo
$195,000
Yearly
lnstallment
s2,358
5z,ooq
Ssoo
Prior Years
Collections
Se,+oo
s17,5oo
s3,soo
Years 20-!X)
2038-2047
523,583
526,042
So
Approx.

Total Required
56s,ooo
s8o,ooo
S4,ooo
s5,453 s29,400 s4,2OO s4,200 s24,550 s49,625 549,625 s149,000