Agenda packet — Folsom City Council, April 22, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
April 22, 2025, 6:30 PM

Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.

Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
 Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table.  Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins.  When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium.  Speakers generally have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.

Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:

In Person Online On TV

City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14

More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda

Page 1 ends

2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Hall | City Council Chambers, First Floor
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 6:30 PM

Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember Barbara Leary, Councilmember Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers: Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Raithel, Aquino The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council meeting.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are generally limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

Page 2 ends

3 CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

1. Approval of March 25, 2025 Special, Regular, and Joint Meeting Minutes

2. Approval of April 8, 2025 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

3. Resolution No. 11350- A Resolution Accepting Funding from the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for 9-1-1 Equipment Maintenance and Appropriation of Funds

4. Resolution No. 11358 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan

5. Resolution No. 11359 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Folsom and Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area

6. Resolution No. 11360 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288F15 for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project

7. Resolution No. 11361 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017) FY 2024-25

8. Resolution No. 11363 - A Resolution Updating the City of Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual

9. Resolution No. 11367- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. for the Lease of 405 Natoma Station Drive, APN 072-0850-029-0000

10. Resolution No. 11368- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Pour Leadership Inc. DBA Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew for the Lease of Retail Space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070-0052-023- 0000

11. Resolution No. 11369 - A Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit Grant Applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the 2024-25 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding Round

Page 3 ends

4 PUBLIC HEARING:

12. Resolutions Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees i. Resolution No. 11364 – A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11219 and Resolution No. 11235 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Selected City Services
ii. Resolution No. 11365- A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11186 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for Selected Community Development User Fees

13. Resolution No. 11366- A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11233 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees

14. Resolution No. 11356 – A Resolution to Amend Resolution No. 11186 and 11235 and Adopt an Amended User Fee Schedule for Community Development Planning and Engineering Services NEW BUSINESS:

15. Ordinance No. 1349 - An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Amending Subsection E(4) and adding Subsection (E)(7) to Section 17.52.510 of the Folsom Municipal Code Pertaining to Minor Illuminated Open Signs in the Historic District Sutter Street Subarea (Introduction and First Reading)

16. Ordinance No. 1350 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom to Designate Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area (LRA) – (Introduction and First Reading)

17. Ordinance No. 1351 – An Ordinance of the City of Folsom Amending Sections 5.20.050(C) and

5.20.070(A)(2) of the Folsom Municipal Code to Increase the Number of Card Tables and Specify the Number of Cardrooms and Card Tables in the City (Introduction and First Reading)

18. Resolution No. 11357 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with HF&H Consultants, LLC for the Water and Wastewater Rate Studies

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concernin g any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding

Page 4 ends

5 planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks , using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.

PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

This meeting of the City Council is recorded with closed captioning. The recording will be cablecast on Metro Cable Channel 14, the local government affairs channel on the Comcast and DirecTV U -Verse cable system, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The recording will also be video streamed at metro14live.saccounty.gov.The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made availabl e at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.

Page 5 ends

6 This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 6 ends

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Special Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The special City Council meeting was called to order at 5:30 pm with Mayor Aquino presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present:

Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember (arrived at 5:40 pm) Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiator- Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: Vance Piggott. Employee Organization: Various Bargaining Groups

Motion by Mayor Aquino second by Vice Mayor Raithel to adjourn to closed session. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski, Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session.

Page 7 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official until Approved by the City Council Page 2

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:30 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Page 8 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Regular and Joint City Council/ Folsom
Ranch Financing Authority Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, March 25, 2025 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm with Mayor Sarah Aquino presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang advised that there were agenda updates for items 1 and 15.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

There were no speakers under this item.

PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Resolution No. 11341 – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Declaring Results of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025-1 Ballot Proceeding, Approving the Final Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Diagram and Assessments, and Ordering the Levying of Assessments for the Maintenance and Servicing of Improvements Within Said District
Parks and Recreation Department Senior Management Analyst Jamison Larson made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information and clarification.

Page 9 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2

Mayor Aquino opened the public hearing at 6:44 pm.

The following speaker addressed the City Council:

1. Sandra Lunceford
Mayor Aquino announced that all assessment ballots must be received by the City Clerk before the public hearing is closed and ballots received after the public hearing is closed will not be tabulated.

She reminded the audience to submit their ballots now to Deputy City Clerk Jennifer Jimenez or City Clerk Specialist Christina Kelley.

The public hearing was closed at 6:48 pm.

The City Council tabled the matter and continued with the remainder of the agenda during the ballot tabulation.

The Joint Meeting was called to order at 6:49 pm with Mayor Sarah Aquino presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember

JOINT MEETING PUBLIC HEARING:

2. Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 7 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

The public hearing was opened at 6:53 pm. Hearing no requests to speak, the public hearing was closed.
i. Resolution No. 11344 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizing the Issuance of the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 7 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2025, the Execution of an Indenture Providing therefor, Authorizing the Execution of a Local Obligation Purchase Contract, and Authorizing Necessary Actions and the Execution of other Documents in Connection Therewith Motion by Vice Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11344. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

Page 10 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 3

ii. Resolution No. 014-Folsom Ranch FA – A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Authorizing the Issuance, Sale and Delivery of not to exceed $12,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) Improvement Area No. 7 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025; Approving the Form and Substance of a Trust Agreement, Authorizing Modifications thereof and Execution and Delivery as Modified; Approving a Preliminary Official Statement, Authorizing Changes thereto and Execution and Delivery of an Official Statement to be Derived therefrom; Approving a Local Obligation Purchase Contract and a Bond Purchase Contract and Execution and Delivery of Each; and Authorizing Related Actions Necessary to Implement the Proposed Financing Motion by Vice Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 014 Folsom Ranch FA. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

The joint meeting was adjourned to the regular meeting at 6:54 pm.

SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

3. City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 Second Quarter Financial Report (Continued from 03/11/2025)
Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer further responded and thanked Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni and her team for compiling the report. He also read a statement from Councilmember Rohrbough regarding this item.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

4. Approval of February 25, 2025 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes

5. Approval of February 28, 2025 Special Meeting Minutes

6. Approval of March 11, 2025 Special, Regular and Joint Meeting Minutes

7. Pulled for discussion

8. Pulled for discussion

9. Pulled for discussion

10. Resolution No. 11342 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 20-031) with HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for Design

Page 11 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 4

Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 1 (Project WA 2101) and Appropriation of Funds

11. Resolution No. 11343 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No. 173-21 23-034) with West Yost & Associates, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Ashland Water Rehabilitation Project No. 1 (WA2101) and Appropriation of Funds

12. Resolution No. 11345 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City’s Allocation of up to $810,000 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Funds Received Through the Allocation Agreement with Sacramento County to Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento for the Construction of the 10 Affordable Housing Units for the Persifer Street Project and Appropriation of Funds

13. Resolution No. 11349 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2D Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Phase 2D Subdivision

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Raithel to approve the Consent Calendar item nos. 4-6 and 10-13. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION

7. Resolution No. 11335 – A Resolution Directing the Finance Director to Make a Transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund for the Amount in Excess of the General Fund Reserve (Continued from 03/11/2025)
Mayor Aquino pulled this item to ask Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni to explain the risk management fund and the reason for the inflation of the unassigned fund balance. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information.

8. Resolution No. 11339 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with S & S Fence Company Inc. for the Replacement of the Existing Wrought Iron Fence at the Natoma Sluice Diggings Site and Use of General Fund (Fund 010) Contingency Budget The City Manager Bryan Whitemyer made a presentation.

The following speaker addressed the City Council:

1. James Tedford

Page 12 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 5

The City Council discussed the item and City Manager Bryan Whitemyer provided additional information.

City Attorney Steven Wang advised that an action must be taken on the resolution. City Manager Bryan Whitemyer stated that staff recommends that council reject the resolution.

Motion by Councilmember Leary, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to reject Resolution No. 11339. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

9. Resolution No. 11340 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with KSI an Aquafinity Company for the Replacement of the Sand Filters at the Steve Miklos Aquatics Center and Use of General of Fund (Fund 010) Contingency Budget This item was pulled for discussion by the public, but comments were already made when addressing item no. 8 so there were no additional comments.

Parks and Recreation Director Kelly Gonzalez introduced Aquatics Supervisor Chad Gunter who spoke about this item.

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11340. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

NEW BUSINESS:

14. Resolution No. 11346 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Approving Revisions to the Repayment Terms of an Approved Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City’s Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc., for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units at the Harrington Grove Multifamily Affordable Housing Development Community Development Department Senior Planner Stephanie Henry made a presentation.

Motion by Vice Mayor Raithel, second by Councilmember Leary to approve Resolution No. 11346. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Leary, Raithel, Kozlowski, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rohrbough
ABSTAIN: None

Page 13 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 6

15. 2024 General Plan (and Housing Element) Annual Progress Report

Community Development Department Planning Manager Desmond Parrington made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer thanked Communications Director Christine Brainerd for assisting with the preparation of his remarks. He provided an update on the recent budget meetings, during which each department presented their budget requests, and noted the opportunity to further connect with City staff. He informed the Council that some Folsom residents have received notices from insurance providers requiring tree removal or trimming for policy renewal purposes and encouraged affected residents to contact City Arborist Aimee Nunez for guidance.

Mr. Whitemyer announced the release of the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, and expressed appreciation to Chief Financial Officer Stacey Tamagni and her team for their work. He recognized the 13 residents who recently graduated from the Folsom CERT Basic Training Academy and noted that the Folsom Fire Department is currently hiring firefighters and paramedics. Mr. Whitemyer addressed a recent alert related to a vehicle crash at Riley and Natoma Streets, acknowledging the lack of clarity in public messaging and thanking the community for their understanding. He also reported on a routine traffic stop that resulted in a significant arrest.

He extended condolences on behalf of the City to the family, friends, and colleagues of El Dorado County Fire Marshal Lucas Shepard following his passing. Lastly, he encouraged community participation in several upcoming events, including Earth Day, the community tree planting at Beacon Hill Park, and the exhibition at The Gallery at 48 Natoma.

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Kozlowski reported on the recent Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) meeting hosted in Rocklin, which included a regional bus tour. He also announced the upcoming SACOG Land Use and Natural Resources Subcommittee meeting, where general plans will be discussed. He encouraged residents to purchase Folsom Pro Rodeo tickets early due to high demand.

Vice Mayor Raithel provided an update on the Sacramento Transportation Authority meeting, which included discussion of a Memorandum of Understanding related to State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding for transportation projects. He also toured the EchoWater Resource Recovery Facility with SacSewer and noted that public tours are available.

Councilmember Leary continued to encourage community participation in the Habitat for Humanity building project on Persifer Street. She also shared efforts to connect struggling small businesses in her district with Chamber of Commerce resources.

Mayor Aquino spoke about attending the Girl Scout Gold Award ceremony and highlighted the community service projects of three recipients. She announced the upcoming Folsom Cordova Unified School District Town Hall regarding school overcrowding and facilities, and a joint meeting with San Juan Unified to discuss changes affecting interdistrict transfers in the American River Canyon area.

She also shared that she recently threw the ceremonial first pitch at the opening Folsom Little League game.

Mayor Aquino inquired with City Clerk Christa Freemantle about the status of the ballot tabulation related to agenda item no. 1. The City Clerk reported that the tabulation process is still underway to

Page 14 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
March 25, 2025

Draft Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 7

ensure accuracy, and no time estimate is currently available. The item will be continued to the next City Council meeting for announcement of the results.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:46 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Page 15 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 16 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.1.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Special Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, April 8, 2025 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The special City Council meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm with Mayor Aquino presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present:

Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent: Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember (arrived at 5:10 pm) Barbara Leary, Councilmember (arrived at 5:01 pm)

ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6. Agency Negotiator: Vance Piggott. Employee Organization: Various Bargaining Groups

2. Conference with Real Property Negotiator – Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8:

Real Property Located at 1 Natoma Street in Folsom, APN 071-0310-014-0000. Negotiating Parties: City Manager Bryan Whitemyer on behalf of the City of Folsom, and Mallory Gonzalez on behalf of the Property Owner. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Sale

Motion by Vice Mayor Raithel second by Councilmember Leary to adjourn to closed session.

Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kozlowski
ABSTAIN: None

RECONVENE
City Attorney Steven Wang announced that no final action was taken during closed session.

Page 17 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official until Approved by the City Council Page 2

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 6:30 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Page 18 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 1

City Council Regular Meeting

MINUTES

Tuesday, April 8, 2025 6:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER

The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm with Mayor Sarah Aquino presiding.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers Present: Justin Raithel, Vice Mayor
Anna Rohrbough, Councilmember
Michael Kozlowski, Councilmember
Barbara Leary, Councilmember
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Councilmembers Absent None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The pledge of allegiance was recited.

AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steven Wang advised that there were no agenda updates.

BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:

The following speakers spoke under this item.

1. Michael Harris

2. Bonnie London
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming April 13-19, 2025 as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week in the City of Folsom
Vice Mayor Raithel presented the proclamation.

2. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming April 22, 2025 as Earth Day, Celebrated on April 26, 2025
Councilmember Rohrbough presented the proclamation.

Page 19 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 2

3. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Encouraging the Community to Become Involved in Arbor Day
Councilmember Leary presented the proclamation.

4. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming April 6-12, 2025 as National Library Week in the City of Folsom
Mayor Aquino presented the proclamation.

5. Presentation from HART of Folsom (Homeless Assistance Resource Team) Regarding the 2025 Winter Shelter
HART Winter Shelter Director Bev Siess made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

6. Folsom Plan Area Semi-Annual Report
Community Development Department Director Pam Johns made a presentatio n. City Engineer Rebecca Neves also made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion.

Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.

7. Resolution No. 11351 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Folsom Lake Ford for the Purchase of One Ford Vehicle and Appropriation of Funds from the Park Capital Equipment Fund for the Purchase and Outfitting of Said Vehicle

8. Resolution No. 11354- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Folsom and the Folsom Police Officers Association (FPOA) Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Councilmember Leary to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

OLD BUSINESS:

9. Resolution No. 11341– A Resolution of the City Council Declaring Results of the Natoma Station Maintenance Assessment District No. 2025 -1 Ballot Proceeding, And Abandoning District Formation Proceedings
Parks and Recreation Department Senior Management Analyst Jamison Larson made a presentation.

The following speakers spoke under this item:

1. Tracey McKinney

Page 20 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 3

2. Wes Jigour

3. Kevin Goddard
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer thanked the speakers and addressed the questions regarding Natoma Station District’s deficit and the challenges with the limited budget. In response to inquiries, City Attorney Steven Wang described the process to repeat the ballot process again if the community decides to do so. Parks and Recreation Department Senior Management Analyst Jamison Larson and the City Attorney Steven Wang responded to further questions from the City Council.

Motion by Vice Mayor Raithel, second by Mayor Aquino to approve Resolution No. 11341.

Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Mayor Aquino thanked everyone for coming to the last meetings. She encouraged everyone to watch for news about the upcoming community meeting regarding next steps for the district.

NEW BUSINESS:

10. Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority (SPTC-JPA) Updated Joint Powers Agreement

i. Resolution No. 11352- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for the Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority

ii. Resolution No. 11353 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amended and Restated Continuing Agreement to Advance Funds for the Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority

Public Works Department Senior Engineer Ryan Neves made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Raithel to approve Resolution No. 11352. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Motion by Councilmember Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Raithel to approve Resolution No. 11353. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None

Page 21 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 4

ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

11. Resolution No. 11355- A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract with Bob Murray & Associates for Executive Recruitment Services for the Public Works Director

Human Resources Director Allison Garcia made a presentation.

Motion by Councilmember Leary, second by Councilmember Kozlowski to approve Resolution No. 11355. Motion passed by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Raithel, Rohrbough, Kozlowski, Leary, Aquino
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bryan Whitemyer recognized the City of Folsom staff for their dedication and energy in serving the community. He expressed appreciation for their continued patience as he works through various ongoing documents and initiatives. He provided an update on the federal grant funding secured for bridge maintenance projects and announced the reopening of the Historic Train Depot. He extended his thanks to FHDA Board Member Jerry Berneau and the broader community for their support in making the project a reality.

Mr. Whitemyer also discussed the release of the updated 2025 Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps by the California Office of the State Fire Marshal. He thanked Fire Chief Ken Cusano for his proactive efforts to keep the public informed. He also shared several recent highlights from public safety teams, including firefighters from Engine and Medic 36 assisting with the delivery of a baby boy and rescuing a group of ducklings. He expressed gratitude to the Folsom Police Department for their support and intervention during two recent juvenile-related incidents.

Finally, he previewed several upcoming community events, including the Festival of Eggs, Community Service Day, and the National Prescription Drug Take Back Day.

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Kozlowski had no comments.

Vice Mayor Raithel highlighted several recent activities, including recognizing Eliza Philip from Vista del Lago High School for winning the Rotary District 5180 speech contest. He also shared his experience judging the Folsom High School Architecture program, discussed the Sac Sewer Harvest Water Program grant, and provided an update from the recent Folsom Cordova Unified School District 2x2 meeting.

Councilmember Rohrbough spoke about a citizen tip that led to the Police Department responding to a juvenile house party. She emphasized the importance of community members reporting suspicious activity. She also shared insights from a recent conference she attended in Monterey.

Page 22 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

File 034-21 25-001
Folsom City Council Minutes
April 8, 2025

Draft- Not Official Until Approved by the City Council Page 5

Councilmember Leary recounted her involvement in a separate instance of baby ducklings and expressed her enthusiasm for the upcoming Community Service Day.

Mayor Aquino had no comments.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:29 pm.

SUBMITTED BY:

_______________________________
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:

______________________________
Sarah Aquino, Mayor

Page 23 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 24 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.2.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11350- A Resolution Accepting Funding from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for 9-1-1 Equipment Maintenance and Appropriation of Funds

FROM: Police Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11350- A Resolution Accepting Funding from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for 9-1-1 Equipment Maintenance and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The current maintenance term for the emergency telecommunication equipment will expire in April of 2025. Additionally, the eight Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) units are at the end of their lifecycle and need to be replaced. The cost for the FY25 maintenance and eight Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) units totals $71,430.15.

Additionally, the cost of the FY26 maintenance term which begins in April 2025 and end in April 2026 is $46,384.74. The total cost of both agreements is $117,814.89, which are presently not budgeted for in the Police Department’s operating budget. Staff recommends the funding from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services be used for these maintenance costs.

POLICY / RULE
City Council Resolution 8367 states that all grants received from the Federal or State government for operating or capital purposes shall be recognized in separate grant project resolutions. A balanced grant project resolution must be adopted prior to beginning the project

ANALYSIS
The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) maintenance contract totals $46,384.74. This maintenance agreement also includes the non-recurring cost of replacing eight

Page 25 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.3.
2 Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) units ensuring 9-1-1 communications work without fail during the interval between when commercial power fails and the police department’s emergency power comes on-line, totaling $23,244.00 plus $1,801.41 of sales tax. These UPS units are at the end of their reliable lifespan and must be replaced. The UPS units are a requirement of the CPE system as outlined by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CAL OES).

The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) maintenance contract agreement totals $46,384.74.

CAL OES has provided the police department with completed and approved “Commitment to Fund 9-1-1 Equipment and Services” form for both the FY25 and FY26 maintenance periods to be utilized for the reimbursement of these expenses.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CAL OES) approved funding for the City of Folsom in the amount of $117,814.89 for 9-1-1 equipment maintenance and does not require a financial match. If accepted the funding award would increase revenue estimates and appropriations by $117,814.89 in the General Fund (Fund 010). Costs would be funded initially through the General Fund (Fund 010) and reimbursed by CAL OES.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
N/A

ATTACHMENTS

Resolution No. 11350- A Resolution Accepting Funding from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for 9-1-1 Equipment Maintenance and Appropriation of Funds.

Submitted,

Rick Hillman, Chief of Police

Page 26 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.3.

Resolution No. 11350

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11350

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FUNDING FROM THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR 9-1-1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE

AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2024-25 maintenance term for the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) is scheduled to expire in April 2025; and

WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 maintenance term will begin in April 2025 and end in April 2026; and

WHEREAS, the cost for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 and Fiscal Year 2025 -26 maintenance totals $117,814.89; and

WHEREAS, the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services has authorized funding for the City in the amount of $117,814.89 for 9-1-1 equipment maintenance; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the General Fund (Fund 010) and will be fully reimbursed by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves the acceptance of the funding from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for 9-1-1 Equipment Maintenance in the amount of $117,814.89, and that the Chief Financial Officer is authorized to increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations by $117,814.89 in the General Fund (Fund 010).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 27 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.3.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 28 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.3.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11358 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan

FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11358 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

In 2017 the City of Folsom updated its Sewer Collection System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Plan (SECAP). The evaluation included a significant expansion of the earlier hydraulic model to include approximately 252 miles of the City sewer system. The hydraulic model used the City’s standard design storm with a 10-year return, 6-hr duration and is used to evaluate both pump and pipeline capacity to ensure the sewer system has the necessary capacity to operate without impacts to the public or the environment.

The intent of the SECAP is to prevent sewer spills by identifying system hydraulic capacity deficiencies including identification of areas with high inflow and infiltration into the sewer system. Steps are then taken to establish short- and long-term capital improvement projects (CIPs) to address identified hydraulic deficiencies and develop a schedule for implementing the CIP.

The updated State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Waste Discharge Requirements (GWDR) Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ for Sanitary Sewer Systems, which went into effect on June 5, 2023, requires the City to update the SECAP and develop a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. In addition to developing the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan, the City is required to develop a

Page 29 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.
2 process that assists the City in prioritizing projects based on the potential consequence of a sewer spill.

In February 2025, the City issued a request for proposal s for Consulting Services for the Preparation of a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The scope of work request included the following:

1. Review Existing City Information.

2. Develop Land Use Planning Information.

3. Update land-use information based on recently adopted General Plan Amendments.

4. Identify various infrastructure funding opportunities for sewer projects.

5. Evaluate funding mechanisms for the specific overla y areas included in the 2024 amendments to the General Plan and Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan related to increased residential density.

6. Develop Design Flow and Hydraulic Criteria.

7. Hydraulic Model Flow Loading and Initial Model Run.

8. Wastewater Flow Data Analysis and Model Calibration.

9. Capacity Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis.

10. Update the SECAP.

11. Develop Project Prioritization based upon severity of consequences of potential spills.

12. Develop a Five-Year Capital Improvement Project Plan and Cost Estimate.

13. Develop Flow Monitoring locations for the Folsom Plan Area.

14. Prepare and Submit Draft and Final Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.

POLICY / RULE

In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $75,049 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS

On February 3, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to provide consulting services for the preparation of a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The City publicly advertised on February 3, 2025 for the Request for Proposal through the Sacramento Bee. Additionally, the RFP was made available on www.virtual-bid.com, www.publicpurchase.com, the City’s website and the RFP notification was also e-mailed directly to twenty-five consultants.

The City received one proposal for the City’s Sewer Master Plan. After reviewing the proposal for project understanding, deliverables, and project team staffing , the proposal was reviewed for project cost. The fee schedule for the scope of work outlined in the RFP from the consultant is shown in the table below:

Consultant Total
Water Works Engineers, LLC $399,938

Page 30 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.
3 Water Works Engineers, LLC was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the scope of work provided in their proposal, the project team, their expertise for these types of projects, and the fee amount. Water Works Engineers, LLC included a detailed and thorough project understanding as well as past relevant hydraulic modeling, system evaluation and capacity assurance planning, and various master plans for multiple clients across the Western United States including two agencies within the greater Sacramento Region (City of Roseville and El Dorado Irrigation District). In addition to this, Water Works, LLC has completed multiple design projects for the City as well as several sewer capacity studies both north and south of Highway 50, including hydraulic modeling work associated with recent General Plan Amendments.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement w ith Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan in the amount of $399,938.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Sufficient funds are budgeted and are available in the Wastewater Operating Fund (Fund 530) in FY 2024-25 to provide for this agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Citywide sewer conveyance facilities have previously been evaluated at various levels of detail through previous environmental studies associated with the Folsom Area Plan, General Plan and recent amendments to the General Plan.

As part of the scope of work, the project team will prepare an administrative Initial Study (IS) based on State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G that will be the basis of the environmental document to be prepared. The incorporate the previous environmental analyses from the Folsom Area Plan, General Plan, and recent amendments to the General Plan to determine if the Sewer Master Plan improvements would create greater or new impacts to the environmental.

Should the results of the preparation of the administrativ e draft initial study identify that the environmental impacts of the Sewer Master Plan are adequately addressed in the environmental documents for the Folsom Plan Area , General Plan and recent amendments to the General Plan , an addendum to the General Plan EIR (as provided in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164) will be prepared.

However, if land areas and/or sewer conveyance corridors where technical analysis of future proposed improvements result in new or greater environmental impacts than identified in previous environmental documents identified above, an Initial Study based on State CEQA Guidelines will be the basis of the environmental document to be prepared and is accounted for in the current scope of work . Upon receiving comments and edits of the I nitial Study, a n Initial Study Negative Declaration (IS/ND) or Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will be prepared.

Page 31 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.
4 ATTACHMENT

Resolution No. 11358 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan

Submitted,

Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Page 32 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.

Resolution No. 11358

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11358

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH WATER WORKS ENGINEERS, LLC FOR THE CITY’S

SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN

WHEREAS, the City is required to update the System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) to develop a broader Sewer Collection System Master Plan that will comply with the updated State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Waste Discharge Requirements (GWDR) Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ for Sanitary Sewer Systems; and

WHEREAS, under the new GWDR, the City is required to develop a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan and prioritize capital improvement projects based on the potential consequence of a sewer spill; and

WHEREAS, Water Works Engineers, LLC by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services are qualified to perform the required consulting services for the project; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Wastewater Operating Fund (Fund 530) for this agreement; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan for a not-to-exceed amount of $399,938.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 33 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 34 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.4.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11359 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Folsom and
Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area

FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11359 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Folsom and Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City of Folsom currently supplies treated and untreated water to an array of residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial users for over 25,000 connections. Based on land use, water demand, and water supply detailed in the City’s Water Master Plan, the ultimate Folsom Plan Area (FPA) maximum daily demand is 8.8 million gallons per day (MGD), which does not include the 0.4 MGD demand within the El Dorado Irrigation District service area.

The Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities includes a ne w 24” diameter water transmission pipeline that extends from an existing manifold located at the intersection of East Bidwell and Iron Point, on the northerly side of US 50, and extends north to the City’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) by ways of the rail an d trail shoulder located on East Bidwell to Oak Avenue Parkway and placement within Oak Avenue Parkway. The project generally consists of the following:
 Additional potholing as needed to identify utility conflicts.  Development of Traffic Control Plans for work covered in the project plans and specifications.

Page 35 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
2  Construction of approximately 18,500 L.F. of new 24” pipeline along the Oak Avenue and East Bidwell corridors.
 Construction of tie -ins to existing pipelines at the WTP, Scholar Way and Broadstone Parkway.
 Trail modifications, grading, paving, drainage system modifications, and tree protection.

POLICY / RULE

In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $75,049 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS

The City solicited bids for the construction of the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities in August 2024 and entered into a construction contract with Mozingo Construction, Inc., who submitted the lowest responsive responsible bid based upon a guaranteed maximum price procurement approach in November 2024. On October 23, 2024, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority issued and sold $26,735,000 in aggregate principal amount Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Fo lsom Community Facilities District No. 18 (Folsom Plan Area – Area-Wide Improvements and Services) Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 (Series 2024 Bonds) to finance certain Authorized Facilities consisting primarily of 18,500 linear feet of 24 -inch wat er transmission pipeline to provide expanded water transmission conveyance capabilities to deliver water from City’s water treatment plant to the Folsom Plan Area (Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities).

The attached agreement memorializes the Land Owner’s rights to certain reimbursements related to design work completed at the sole cost and expense of the Land Owners for the construction of Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities. Following completion and acceptance of the construction work by City, the reimbursements shall be paid by City to the Land Owners as specified in the agreement within thirty (30) days with remaining proceeds of the Bonds (Bond Proceeds), pay-as- you-go (PAYGO) funds, and/or special taxes becoming available to fund the direct payment of the reimbursements and not required to fund debt service or administrative expenses in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment . Effectively, the agreement requires that the construction of the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities be accepted and complete prior to reimbursing the Land Owners for previous project costs and expenses.

This resolution will authorize City Manager to execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Folsom and Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area.

FISCAL IMPACT

This reimbursement agreement is funded by PAYGO funds from the established Community Facilities District No. 17 (Fund 737) and special tax revenue bond proceeds and PAYGO funds from Community Facilities District No. 18 (Fund 738). Thus, no ratepayer funding will be used for the reimbursements included in this agreement.

Page 36 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

On December 11, 2012, through Resolution No. 9096, the Folsom City Council approved and certified an addendum to the Environmental Impact Report , along with its related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, for the Folsom Plan Area (FPA) Specific Plan Project for purposes of analyzing an alternative water supply for the Project. The Addendum concluded that the use of the FPA Water Supply and the changes in the facilities to treat and convey that water supply to the FPA will not (1) result in new significant impacts not identified in the FPA EIR/EIS; (2) substantially increase the severity of impacts previously disclosed in the FPA EIR/EIS; or (3) involve any of the other conditions related to new information that can require a subsequent or supplemental EIR under Public Resources Cod e section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162, and that therefore the use of the FPA Water Supply and changes in the facilities to treat and convey that supply will not have any incrementally significant effects on the environment and that the impacts of the use of the FPA Water Supply are within the range of potential impacts identified in the FPA EIR/EIS.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11359 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement A greement between the City of Folsom and Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area

2. Folsom Plan Area Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement

Submitted,

Stacey Tamagni

FINANCE DIRECTOR/CFO

Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Page 37 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

Attachment 1

Page 38 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 11359

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11359

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
THE PHASE 2 WATER TRANSMISSION FACILTIES REIMBURSEMENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND

CERTAIN LAND OWNERS IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA

WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water distribution system; and

WHEREAS, certain Land Owners advanced all necessary project planning and design costs; and

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2024, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority issued and sold $26,735,000 in aggregate principal amount Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 18 special tax revenue bonds to finance construction of the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities and other related costs; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available as PAYGO in the Community Facilities District No. 17 Fund (Fund 737) and Community Facilities District No. 18 Fund (Fund 738); and

WHEREAS, reimbursements will not be issued by the City to the Land Owners until the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities are completed and accepted; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Folsom and Certain Land Owners in the Folsom Plan Area.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 39 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

Attachment 2

Page 40 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
1 CITY OF FOLSOM

FOLSOM PLAN AREA
PHASE 2 WATER TRANSMISSION FACILITIES

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities Reimbursement Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Folsom , a municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), on the one hand, and Arcadian Improvement Company, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Arcadian”), CMB Improvement Company, LLC , a California limited liability company (“CMB”), Dignity Health, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (“Dignity Health”), Eagle Commercial Partners , LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ECP”), Eagle Office Properties, LLC , a Delaware limited liability company (“EOP”), East Carpenter Improvement Company, a California limited liability company (“ECIC”), Easton Valley Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Easton”), Elliott Homes, Inc., an Arizona corporation (“Elliott”), Folsom Real Estate South, L LC, a Delaware limited liability company (“FRES”), Gragg Ranch Recovery Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Gragg”), Hillsborough North, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Hillsborough”), J&Z Property, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“J&Z”), Lennar Homes of California, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Lennar”) , TCS Improvement Company, LLC , a California limited liability company (“ TCS”), University of California Davis Health (“UC Davis”) , West Prairie Estates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“WPE”), and Woodside 05N, LP, a California limited partnership (“Woodside”) on the other hand (individually, Arcadian, CMB, Dignity Health, ECP, EOP, ECIC, Easton, Elliott, FRES, Gragg , Hillsborough, J&Z, Lennar, TCS, UC Davis, WPE, and Woodside are referred to herein as an “Owner”, and, collectively, as the “Owners”) as of the 30th day of April 2025 (the “Effective Date”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, City adoped Resolution No. 9692 to form City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 18 (Folsom Plan Area – Area-Wide Improvements and Services) (the “District”) within the Folsom Plan Area to fund the acquisition, construction, and improvement of public facilities authorized u nder the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, constituting Section 53311, et seq. of the California Government Code, including, certain water facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, an aquatic center, quarry road improvements, certain tr ails, interchanges and roadway widenings, and other backbone infrastructure needed to serve the Folsom Plan Area (“Authorized Facilities”); and WHEREAS, the District levies special taxes to fund, among other things, the Authorized Facilities; and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2024, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority (the “Authority”) issued and sold $26,735,000 in aggregate principal amount Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 18 (Folsom Plan Area – Area-Wide Improvements and Services) Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 (the “ Series 2024 Bonds”) to finance certain Authorized Facilities consisting primarily of 18,500 linear feet of 24-inch water transmission pipeline to provide expanded water transmission conveyanc e capabilities to deliver water from City’s water treatment plant to the Folsom Plan Area (the “Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities”); and
WHEREAS, the District intends to cause the Authority to issue and sell additional series of Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 18 (Folsom Plan Area – Area-Wide Improvements and Services) Special Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 41 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
2 (together with the Series 2024 Bonds, the “Bonds”) to fund, among other things, the Authorized Facilities; and
WHEREAS, City solicited bids for the construction of the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities in August 2024 and enter ed into a construction contract with the contractor submitting the lowest responsive responsible bid based upon a guaranteed maximum price procurement approach in November 2024 (“Construction Work”); and
WHEREAS, City expects to commence the Construction Work using proceeds of the 2024 Series Bonds in the first quarter of 2025 and for construction to last approximately 18 months; and
WHEREAS, Owners advanced all necessary costs to plan and design the Phase 2 Water Transmission Facilities (“Design Work”); and
WHEREAS, City and Owner s desire to memorialize (1) Owners’ rights to reimbursements equal to the Total Eligible Costs (as defined herein) of the Design Work (“Reimbursements”) as provided herein, and (2) City’s right to use proceeds of the 2024 Series Bonds to finance the Construction Work prior to paying Owners the Reimbursements; and WHEREAS, any and all monetary obligations of City arising out of this Agreement with respect to the Reimbursements are the special and limited obligations of City payable only from special taxes and proceeds of the Bonds and no other funds whatsoever of the District, the Authority, or City shall be obligated therefor under any circumstances.

NOW, THERFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Owners agree as follows:

SECTION 1 DESIGN AND PLANNING WORK
Owners have caused the completion of the Design Work, at their sole cost and expense, and delivered the same to City for City’s use in the Construction Work. The Design Work was prepared by licensed third party consultants and professionals and not the Owners.

Owners make no, and expressly disclaim and negate any, representation, warranty, guaranty , or assurance, express or implied, oral or written, made directly or through any employee or agent, with respect t o the Design Work or its use for the Construction Work, including, without limitation, as to the accuracy, adequacy, fitness, or completeness of the Design Work or its use for the Construction Work.

SECTION 2 REIMBURSEMENT
City and Owners agree that the amount of Reimbursements owed to each Owner for the Design Work is as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Total Eligible Costs”). Following completion and acceptance of the Construction Work by City and further expressly subject to Section 3 below, t he Reimbursements shall be paid by City to Owners as specified and in the amounts or percentages, as applicable, listed on Exhibit A within thirty (30) days of p roceeds of the Bonds (“Bond Proceeds”) and/or special taxes becoming available to fund the direct payment of the Reimbursements and not required to fund debt service or Administrative Expenses as defined in and determined in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the District (the "Available Pay -Go Proceed s" and together with the Bond Proceeds, the “Available CFD Amount”). The Reimbursements shall be paid by City based on the percentages listed on Exhibit A only if the Available CFD Amount is

Page 42 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
3 insufficient to pay the Reimbursements owed to each owner in the amounts listed in Exhibit A at the time of any such payment.

SECTION 3 PRIORITY ORDER OF REIMBURSEMENT
As between the Construction Work and the Design Work, the Available CFD Amount shall be used first to fund City’s Construction Work, and second to pay Owners the Reimbursements.

For the avoidance of doubt, City shall pay Owners the Reimbursements only after completion and acceptance of the Construction Work by City , if there is any Available CFD Amount remaining after paying for the Const ruction Work, and prior to using any Available CFD Amount to finance any Authorized Facilities other than the Construction Work , including but not limited to the Zone 4 water facilities (consisting of a zone -specific water tank and booster pump station) an d the remaining phase 2 water facilities not included in the Construction Work (consisting of another zone -specific water tank and booster pump station) . Nothing herein is intended or shall be construed to amend or otherwise affect any Acquisition and Sho rtfall Agreement previously entered into and approved by City with respect to the District , including but not limited to the reimbursement priority provided thereunder.

SECTION 4 “TRUE UP” OF REIMBURSEMENT
City acknowledges and agrees that Owners have provided the following items to the City for purposes of determining the Total Eligible Costs incurred by Owners for the Design Work that qualifies for Reimbursement: (i) copies of the original contract and any change orders that have been agreed to by Owners, consultant, and City; (ii) copies of all invoices; (iii) copies of all checks issued by Owners with related invoices indicated; and (iv) a summary tabulation of all invoices and payments by Owners.

SECTION 5 ATTORNEY’S FEES
If any suit, action or proceeding in law or equity is brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party (ies) shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees.

SECTION 6 AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT
Owners and City certify that they have the authority and are legally empowered to enter into this Agreement on behalf of their entity and to bind their party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

SECTION 7 NOTICES
Any notices, requests, demands , or other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement may be sent to the parties at the addresses below by (a) personal delivery, (b) a nationally recognized overnight courier for overnight delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered one (1) business day after deposit with such courier, or (c) electronic mail (email) transmission (followed by hard copy deposited the same day for delivery pursuant to subparts (a) or (b)), in which case notice shall be deemed delivered u pon verification that transmission to recipient was completed; provided that any notice given by electronic mail on a non -business day or after 5:00 p.m. (local time in Folsom, CA ) on a business day shall be effective on the immediately succeeding business day. Verification that notices sent by electronic mail have been completed shall occur through any one of the following means: (i) confirmation of receipt sent by the recipient by any means; (ii) a response from the recipient referring to the particular notice or specific contents of the notice; or (iii) any other method clearly establishing the actual receipt of the notice by the addressee. The below

Page 43 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
4 mailing addresses and email addresses may be changed by written notice to the other part ies; provided that no notice of a change of address or email address shall be effective until actual receipt of such notice.
(a) If to City:

City of Folsom
Attn: Rebecca Neves, City Engineer
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
E-mail: [email protected]

With a copy to:

City of Folsom
Attn: Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director/SPIF Fee Program Administrator 50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
E-mail: [email protected]

City of Folsom
Attn: Marcus Yasutake, Director, Environmental and Water Resources Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
E-mail: [email protected]

(b) If to Owners:

See Exhibit B
Each party may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such changes to the other party in the manner provided herein.

SECTION 8 TERM
The term of this Agreement shall start on the day and year duly executed by all parties and shall remain in effect until all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement have been satisfied.

SECTION 9 SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

SECTION 10 EXHIBITS
The Exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 11 ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. The Agreement may be amended only by writing executed by all parties.

Page 44 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
5 SECTION 12 COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and taken together shall constitute one document.

SECTION 13 EFFECTIVE DATE
The date of City’s execution of this Agreement shall be deemed to be the “Effective Date” of this Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement by City, City shall insert the Effective Date in the Preamble to this Agreement and provide a copy of this fully executed and dated Agreement to Owners on or before March 1, 2025.

SECTION 14 THIRD PARTY LIABILITY
City does not assume any liability, duty , or obligation to Owners’ consultants, contractors, subcontractors, agents , or any person or entity not a party to this Agreement by execution or performance of this Agreement . There are no third party beneficiaries of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above-written.

CITY:

CITY OF FOLSOM,
a municipal corporation

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: City Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: Community Development Department
Director

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: Finance Director/SPIF Administrator

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: City Engineer

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Its: City Attorney

Page 45 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
6 OWNERS:

ARCADIAN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY,
LLC, a California limited liability company

By: HBT 1C, LLC,
a California limited liability
company
Its: Manager

By:

William B. Bunce, Member

CMB IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
a California limited liability company

By: HBT CMB, LLC,
a California limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By:

Name: William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

DIGNITY HEALTH, a California nonprofit
public benefit corporation

By:

Name: Travis Messina
Its: Senior Vice President

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(Outside Counsel for Dignity Health)

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD
LLP

By:

Name: R. Brooks Whitehead
Title: Partner

EAGLE COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By:

Name:

Its:

EAGLE OFFICE PROPERTIES, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By:

Name:

Its:

EAST CARPENTER IMPROVEMENT
COMPANY, a California limited liability
company

By: HBT ECIC, LLC,
a California limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By:

Name: William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

EASTON VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: HBT Carpenter, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By: ____________________________
William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

ELLIOTT HOMES, INC.,
an Arizona corporation

By:

Name:

Its:

Page 46 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
7 FOLSOM REAL ESTATE SOUTH, LLC,
Delaware limited liability company

By: HBT Mangini, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By: ____________________________,
William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

GRAGG RANCH RECOVERY
ACQUISITION, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company

By:

Name:

Its:

HILLSBOROUGH NORTH, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: HBT Hillsborough, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By: ____________________________
William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

J&Z PROPERTY, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: HBT J&Z, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By: ____________________________
William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC,
a California limited liability company

By:

Name:

Its:

TCS IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
a California limited liability company

By: HBT Town Center, LLC,
a California limited liability company
Its: Manager

By:

William B. Bunce, Member

Page 47 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.
8 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
HEALTH

By:

Name:

Its:

WEST PRAIRIE ESTATES, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: HBT Carpenter, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Managing Member

By:

William B. Bunce
Its: Manager

WOODSIDE 05N, LP,
a California limited partnership

By: WDS GP, Inc.,
a California corporation
Its: General Partner

By:

Michael LaFortune
Its: Authorized Signer

Page 48 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

A-1

Exhibit A

Total Eligible Costs

ENTITY AMOUNT %
Arcadian Improvement Company, LLC 70,905.43$ 3.01% CMB Improvement Company, LLC 116,840.83$ 4.96%
Dignity Health 55,760.50$ 2.37%
Eagle Commercial Partners, LLC 196,087.96$ 8.32%
Eagle Office Properties, LLC 45,525.52$ 1.93%
East Carpenter Improvement Company, LLC 149,820.11$ 6.36% Easton Valley Holdings, LLC 277,968.12$ 11.80%
Elliott Homes, Inc. 29,162.25$ 1.24%
Folsom Real Estate South, LLC 372,194.60$ 15.80%
Gragg Ranch Recovery Acquisition, LLC 72,257.58$ 3.07% Hillsborough North, LLC 469,209.62$ 19.92%
J&Z Properties, LLC 32,508.14$ 1.38%
Lennar Homes of California, LLC 211,264.32$ 8.97%
TCS Improvement Company, LLC 66,900.80$ 2.84%
UC Davis Health 40,422.12$ 1.72%
West Prairie Estates, LLC 147,700.01$ 6.27%
Woodside 05N, LP 1,134.09$ 0.05%
Total: 2,355,662.00$ 100.00%

Page 49 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

B-1
Exhibit B

Onwer Notice Information

[See Attached]

Page 50 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

B-2

Entity Contact Address Email
Arcadian Improvement
Company, LLC
William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd.,
Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
CMB Improvement
Company, LLC
William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd.,
Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
Dignity Health Corporate Real
Estate
CommonSpirit Health
Attn: SSVP NRES
198 Inverness Drive West
Englewood, CO 80112

With copy to:

CommonSpirit Health
Attn: Legal Team
3200 N. Central Avenue,
23rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85012
robert.o'[email protected]
Eagle Commercial Partners,
LLC
Jim Galovan 100 Pine Street, Floor 29,
San Francisco, CA
94111

[email protected]
Eagle Office Properties,
LLC
Jim Galovan 100 Pine Street, Floor 29,
San Francisco, CA
94111

[email protected]
Easton Valley Holdings, LLC William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd., Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
East Carpenter
Improvement Company,
LLC
William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd.,
Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
Elliott Homes, Inc. Price Walker 340 Palladio Parkway,
Suite 521,
Folsom, CA 95630

[email protected]
Folsom Real Estate South,
LLC
William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd.,
Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
Gragg Ranch Recovery
Acquisition, LLC
Patrick Parker c/o Raintree Investment.,
10421 S. Jordan
Gateway, Suite 200,
[email protected]

Page 51 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

B-3
Entity Contact Address Email
South Jordan, UT 84095

Hillsborough North, LLC William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd., Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
J&Z Property, LLC William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd., Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
Lennar Homes of California,
LLC
Larry Gualco 1025 Creekside Ridge
Drive, Suite 240,
Roseville, CA 95678

[email protected]
TCS Improvement
Company, LLC
William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd.,
Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
UC Davis Health Lisa Hinton 4620 V Street,
Sacramento, CA 95817

[email protected]
West Prairie Estates, LLC William Bunce 4370 Town Center Blvd., Suite 100,
El Dorado Hills, CA
95762

[email protected]
Woodside 05N, LP Michael
LaFortune
1130 Iron Point Road,
Suite 200
Folsom, CA 95630
[email protected]

Page 52 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.5.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11360 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to
Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288F15 for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11360 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288F15 for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Folsom Lake Crossing Median Barrier Phase 2 Project aims to enhance roadway safety along the segment of Folsom Lake Crossing between Folsom Dam Road and Folsom Auburn Road. This corridor serves as a high-volume arterial route. Phase 1 safety improvements were completed in 2023 , including open-grade friction course resurfacing, a thrie-beam median barrier, dynamic speed warning signs, and updated striping.

Despite these efforts, further en hancements are needed to address ongoing safety concerns, particularly regarding head -on collisions, nighttime visibility, and turning conflicts at the intersection with Gun Range Road. The Phase 2 scope analyz es and desig ns additional roadway safety improvements, including new or modified median barriers, enhanced lighting options (wired and solar), dynamic signage, reduced lane width configurations, and increased use of delineators, reflectors, and retro-reflective object markers.

In response to Congressman Kiley's call for Congressionally Directed Spending projects, the City of Folsom Public Works Department submitted the Phase 2 project and was awarded

Page 53 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.
2 $1.04 million in federal funding. Local matching funds of $ 134,743, so urced from the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446), will supplement the total project cost.

To access these federal funds, the City must execute a Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans. This agreement is required before the City can invoice Ca ltrans for reimbursable project expenses. Once executed, the City will initiate the Preliminary Engineering phase by advertising a Request for Proposals (RFP). This phase includes the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E), right -of-way coordination, utility relocation analysis, environmental clearance (CEQA/NEPA), and public engagement.

POLICY / RULE

Caltrans requires that the executed Program Supplement Agreement be accompanied by a certified Resolution clearly identif ying the repre sentative who is authorized to sign on the Agency’s behalf.

ANALYSIS

The City of Folsom is required to execute the Program Supplement Agreement with Caltrans Local Assistance before invoicing Caltrans for any reimbursable costs.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City of Folsom was awarded $1,040,000 in Congressionally Directed Spending to support the design and construction phases of the project. In accordance with federal funding requirements, the City must provide an 11.47% local match, which equates to $134,743, for a total funding amount of 1,174,743.

Sufficient matching funds are available in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446 ) to meet the local match required. During the design phase, a cost estimate will be produced to determine the actual costs of the project. These combined funding sources will likely fully fund the Preliminary Engineering phase and possibly the Construction Phase, subject to future City Council approval of consultant agreements and construction contracts.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

As part of the Preliminary Engineering phase of this project, an analysis will be performed to determine compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11360 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03 - 5288F15 for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project.

Page 54 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.
3 2. Program Supplement Agreement F035 to Administer Agency -State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 03-5288F15

3. Map of Project Location

Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Page 55 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

Attachment 1

Page 56 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

Resolution No. 11360

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11360

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT 03-5288F15 FOR THE FOLSOM LAKE CROSSING SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2 PROJECT

WHEREAS, the Public Works Department responded to a call for projects for Congressionally Directed Spending funds for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvement Phase 2 Project; and

WHEREAS, the project was selected to receive $1.04 million in Congressionally Directed Spending funds; and

WHEREAS, the executed Program Supplement Agreement must be returned to Caltrans before invoicing for any reimbursable expenses; and

WHEREAS, Caltrans requires t hat the signed Program Supplement Agreement is accompanied by a certified Resolution that identifies the representative who is authorized to sign on the Agency’s behalf; and

WHEREAS, the local matching funds required are 11.47% of received federal funds, or $134,743, and funds are available in the Transportation Improvement Fund (Fund 446); and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes t he City Manager to execute a Program Supplement Agreement to Administering Agency-State Agreement 03-5288F15 for the Folsom Lake Crossing Safety Improvement Phase 2 Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

____________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 57 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

Attachment 2

Page 58 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

F035
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO 03-5288F15
0325000141
March 21, 2025
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)
5288
This Program Supplement hereby adopts and incorporates the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Administering Agency and the State on 10/18/2016 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the Administering Agency on (See copy attached).

The Administering Agency further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below obligated to this PROJECT, the Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the special covenants or remarks set forth on the following pages.

In the City of Folsom, on Folsom Lake Crossing between Folsom Auburn Road and Folsom Dam Road
Construct Roadway Safety Improvements including a Median Barrier and Pavement Resurfacing

0.0(MILES)
Federal Funds
Estimated Cost Matching Funds
Y603 $400,000.00

CITY OF FOLSOM
By ________________________________ By ________________________________ Title _______________________________
Date _______________________________
Attest _______________________________ Date _______________________________ Division of Local Assistance
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:

Accounting Officer _______________________ Date _______________ PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO.
to

ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
Adv. Project ID Date:

Location:

Project Number:

E.A. Number:

Locode:

PROJECT LOCATION:

TYPE OF WORK: LENGTH:

LOCAL OTHER
$451,824.00 $51,824.00 $0.00
Chief, Office of Project Management Oversight

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
$400,000.00
1 Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEA
03/21/2025Page 59
04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)

1. A. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

B. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds are needed for those future phase(s).

C. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that any additional funds which might be made available by future Federal obligations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE-approved "Authorization to Proceed" and Finance Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that Federal funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amounts obligated by the Federal Highway Administration.

D. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to the District Local Assistance Engineer within 60 days of project contract award and prior to the submittal of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S first invoice for the construction contract.

Failure to do so will cause a delay in the State processing invoices for the construction phase.

Attention is directed to Section 15.6 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

E. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this Project Program Supplement Agreement, or by STATE's approval of an applicable Finance Letter. STATE reserves the right to suspend future authorizations/obligations for Federal aid projects, or encumbrances for State funded projects, as well as to suspend invoice payments for any on-going or future project by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period.

If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit for each phase a written explanation of the absence of PROJECT activity along with target billing date and target billing amount.

ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of PROJECT completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
2Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 60 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)
F. Administering Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, age, disability, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any Federal-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program Implementation Agreement. The Administering Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of Federal-assisted contracts. The Administering Agency's DBE Implementation Agreement is incorporated by reference in this Agreement. Implementation of the DBE Implementation Agreement, including but not limited to timely reporting of DBE commitments and utilization, is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this Agreement. Upon notification to the Administering Agency of its failure to carry out its DBE Implementation Agreement, the State may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).

G. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are available for disbursement for limited periods of time. For each fund encumbrance the limited period is from the start of the fiscal year that the specific fund was appropriated within the State Budget Act to the applicable fund Reversion Date shown on the State approved project finance letter. Per Government Code Section 16304, all project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance.

ADMINISTERING AGENCY should ensure that invoices are submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer at least 75 days prior to the applicable fund Reversion Date to avoid the lapse of applicable funds. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance; in order for payment to be made, the last date the District Local Assistance Engineer can forward an invoice for payment to the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office for reimbursable work for funds that are going to revert at the end of a particular fiscal year is May 15th of the particular fiscal year. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement involving applicable funds that is not received by the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office at least 45 days prior to the applicable fixed fund Reversion Date will not be paid. These unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on the applicable fund Reversion Date.

H. As a condition for receiving federal-aid highway funds for the PROJECT, the Administering Agency certifies that NO members of the elected board, council, or other key decision makers are on the Federal Government Exclusion List. Exclusions can be found at www.sam.gov. 3Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 61 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)

2. A. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all State statutes, regulations and procedures (including those set forth in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines, hereafter collectively referred to as "LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES") relating to the federal-aid program, all Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) and 2 CFR Part 200 federal requirements, and all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional memoranda, unless otherwise specifically waived as designated in the executed project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT.

B. Invoices shall be formatted in accordance with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES.

C. ADMINISTERING AGENCY must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit supporting backup documentation with invoices if requested by State. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs.

D. Indirect Cost Allocation Plan/Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICAP/ICRP), Central Service Cost Allocation Plans and related documentation are to be prepared and provided to STATE (Caltrans Audits & Investigations) for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect costs incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for State and federal reimbursement. ICAPs/ICRPs must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedural Manual, and the ICAP/ICRP approval procedures established by STATE.

E. STATE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all federal funds encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT.

F. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT-related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid rank and file STATE employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess of DPA rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand within thirty (30) days of such invoice. 4Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 62 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)
G. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards.

H. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items.

I. Every sub-recipient receiving PROJECT funds under this AGREEMENT shall comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR Chapter 1, Part 31, Local Assistance Procedures, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300-10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations.

J. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE.

K. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT WORK and records and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by the following paragraph:

ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit by STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested.

All of the above referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT, PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and contract materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the STATE to the FHWA.

L. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain a financial management system and records that properly accumulate and segregate reasonable, allowable, and allocable incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The financial management system
5Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 63 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)
of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices set to or paid by STATE.

M. ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 2 CFR 200 if it expends $750,000 or more in Federal Funds in a single fiscal year of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance.

N. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to include all PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTS adopting the terms of this AGREEMENT in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY's annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200.

O. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a non-A&E contract over $5,000, construction contracts over $10,000, or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code sections 4525 (d), (e) and (f)] on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. Contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY, if intended as local match credit, must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding local match funds.

P. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain provisions B, C, F, H, I, K, and L under Section 2 of this agreement.

3. Appendix E of the Title VI Assurances (US DOT Order 1050.2A) During the performance of this agreement, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractor, (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees to comply with the following nondiscrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:

Pertinent Nondiscrimination Authorities:

A. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21.

B. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); C. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex);
D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as 6Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 64 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-SAC-0-FOL
CPFL-5288(055)
amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; E. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
F. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. 4 71, Section 4 7123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); G. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or
activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);
H. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; I. The Federal Aviation Administration's Nondiscrimination statute (49 U.S.C. 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); J. Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures nondiscrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; K. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100);
L. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq).

4. In the event that construction of this project of the initial federal authorization for right of way is not started by the close of the twentieth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the right of way is authorized, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall repay the Federal Highway Administration through Caltrans the sum of Federal funds paid under the terms of this agreement.

Authorizing the ROW phase of a project as Advance Construction does not exempt the project from the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 108(a)(2), and 23 CFR 630.112(c)(1). 7Page of 7Program Supplement 03-5288F15-F035- ISTEAPage 65 04/22/2025 Item No.6.

Attachment 3

Page 66 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

East Natoma StreetPlanned Limits of Project
(Subject to Funds Available)
Previous Phase of Safety
Improvements

MAP OF PROJECT LOCATION AND EXPECTED LIMITS OF WORK
Previously installed guard rail style
Anticipated to match new section

Page 67 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 68 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.6.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11361 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017) FY 2024-25

FROM: Public Works Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11361 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017) FY 2024-25.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City of Folsom Public Works Department maintains a Pavement Management Program (PMP) that is updated every five years. This program serves to identify road maintenance and repair needs throughout the city. The goal of the program is to maintain the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the city using Measure A and SB1 Gas Tax funds.

This project aims to address many of the road maintenance and rehabilitation needs of the city as outlined in the PMP. This involves a three-pronged approach of preventative maintenance, repairs, and rehabilitation. The scope of work includes milling and replacement of asphalt, crack filling, slurry sealing, installation of concrete gutters, sidewalks , and curbs, removal and replac ement of ADA ramps and manholes, curb painting, pavement markings, and thermoplastic striping.

Construction is anticipated to begin in early May and be completed by August 2025.

Page 69 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.
2 POLICY / RULE

Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $75,049 or greater shall be awarded by the City Council.

ANALYSIS

Public Works staff prepared the bid package, and the project was publicly advertised on February 12, 2025. On April 2, 2025, the Public Works Department received the following bids:

 Consolidated Engineering, Inc. $ 1,408,999.00
 ALL Phase Construction, Inc. $ 1,429,985.00
 Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. $ 1,585,669.00  Doug Veerkamp General Engineering, Inc. $ 1,676,705.00  All American Construction, Inc. $ 1,695,730.00
 VSS International $ 1,750,120.00
 B&M Civil LLC $ 2,011,300.00
 Martin Brothers Construction, Inc. $ 2,108,890.00
 Pavement Coatings Co. $ 2,182,635.00

The Engineer’s Estimate for this project was $1,900,000.00. The Public Works Department has evaluated the bids received and recommends that the contract be awarded to the low -bidder, Consolidated Engineering, Inc.

Staff will use the City’s standard Construction Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The contract with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. would be authorized for $1,408,999.00 with the project budgeted for a total of $1,549,898.90 which will include a 10% contingency amount of $140,899.90 for potential change orders.

Sufficient funding is currently budgeted and available in the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017), with allocations from SB-1 funds (Fund 235) and Measure A funds (Fund 276), to fully cover the $1,549,898.90 cost of the contract and 10% contingency.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.

Page 70 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.
3 ATTACHMENT

Resolution No. 11361 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017) FY 2024-25

Exhibit A – Map of Proposed Work
Exhibit B – Project Details

Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Page 71 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11361
Inclusive of Exhibits A and B
RESOLUTION NO. 11361

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR THE PAVEMENT REPAIR AND RESURFACING PROJECT
(PROJECT 8017) FY 2024-25

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to repair and rehabilitate the existing pavement and asphalt on various roadways within the City; and

WHEREAS, a map identifying the proposed work can be found in Exhibit A and the details of the proposed work can be found in Exhibit B; and

WHEREAS, the project was publicly advertised, and the bids were received on April 2, 2025, with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. being the lowest responsible bidder; and

WHEREAS, sufficient funding is currently budgeted and available in the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017), with allocations from SB -1 funds (Fund 235) and Measure A funds (Fund 276), to ful ly cover the $1,549,898.90 cost of the contract and 10% contingency; and

WHEREAS, the contract will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute a Construction Agreement with Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the Pavement Repair and Resurfacing Project (Project 8017) FY 2024- 25 in the amount of $1,408,999, with the budgeted amount to include a 10% contingency for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,549,898.90.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR
ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 72 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11361
Exhibit A – Map of Proposed Work

Page 73 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Trail OvercrossingPatches & StripingOak Avenue PkwyDigout PatchesE Bidwell StPatch MHGolf Links DrMill & Replace Patches,Minor StripingCity Hall DrivewayMill & ReplaceHistoric DistrictDigouts & StripingLembi ParkSlurry SealLos CerrosPatches & Slurry SealIron Point RdPatches,Slurry Seal,& RestripingMcAdoo DrDigouts at MH'sHalidon WayPatch Manholes E Natoma StMill & Replace Patch,Minor StripingBriggs RanchDigouts & Slurry Seal 2025 Pavement Project Details
E Bidwell StMill & ReplaceCostco DrivewaysMill & Replace, StripingStonemill CirclePatch Around Manholes,Minor Striping

Page 74 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Resolution No. 11361
Exhibit B – Project Details

Page 75 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Pavement Repair & Resurfacing
Project FY 24-25
The City of Folsom
CA, 95630

Page 76 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

City Hall Driveway - From Natoma Street to 300’ Into the Property Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
driveway.
12,000 SF
~150 Tons
2-Coat Paint Striping -
Crosswalk
Restripe impacted crosswalk
with 2-coat paint.

Match existing layout.
(4” white lines)
50 SF
2-Coat Paint Striping -
White Parking
Brackets
Restripe impacted white parking
brackets with 2-coat paint.

Match existing layout.
110 SF

Page 77 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Reading Street - From Bidwell Street to Natoma Street Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
3” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
roadway.
25,000 SF
~500 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping - Stop
Bars
Restripe stop bars along
Reading St as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications,
according to existing
layout. 12” wide and 20’
long each.
60 SF
Thermoplastic
Striping - STOP
Legends
Restripe thermoplastic
STOP legends along
Reading St as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications,
according to existing
layout.
4 (~90 SF)
Thermoplastic
Striping - Basic
Crosswalk
Restripe basic-style
crosswalk at N approach
of the intersection at
Natoma St as per Section
A24F of the 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications.

Match existing layout.
100 SF

Page 78 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Persifer Street - From Sibley Street to Reading Street Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
3” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
roadway.
14,000 SF
~280 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping - Stop
Bars
Restripe stop bars along
Reading St according to
existing layout, as per
2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans and Specifications.
12” wide and 30’ long
each.
2 (~60 SF)
Thermoplastic
Striping - STOP
Legends
Restripe STOP legends
along Persifer St
according to existing
layout. See 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications,
Section A24D.
2 (~50 SF)

Page 79 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Halidon Way Near Pinder Court Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’ mill and
replace asphalt around
manholes.
800 SF
~12 Tons
MH
MH

Page 80 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Halidon Way at Parsons Way Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 15’x15’ mill and
replace asphalt around
manhole and at dip.
450 SF
~8 Tons
Patch
MH

Page 81 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

McAdoo Drive - Around Manholes Item Description Quantity Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’
mill and replace
asphalt around
manholes.
2,000 SF
~28 Tons
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH

Page 82 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Golf Links Drive at Sturbridge Dr Item Description Quantity Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
roadway.
4,000 SF
~58 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Ladder X-Walk
Stripe impacted crosswalks
as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans Section
A24F. Use 24” stripes,
spaced 24” apart. Match
existing layout.
620 SF
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail
22 Restripe impacted two way
no passing zone lines and
reflectors. Use 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
110 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail
39 Restripe impacted bike lane
lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
220 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping - Stop
Bar
Restripe impacted stop bar
as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
1 (~30 SF)
Thermoplastic
Striping - STOP
Legend
Restripe impacted STOP
legend at Sturbridge Dr. as
per 2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans and Specifications.

Match existing layout.
1 (~22 SF)
1 2
3 1
2 3
Golf Links Drive at
Morningside Dr
Golf Links Drive at Arlington St

Page 83 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Item Description Quantity
Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 10’x10’ milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manhole.
100 SF
~2 Tons
Golf Links Dr South of Woodglen Dr
MH

Page 84 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Riley Street at Bidwell Street
*Night Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace Asphalt 2” depth milling and replacement of asphalt roadway.

Avoid existing loop detectors.

Night work only.
11,000 SF
~150 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 12
Restripe impacted lane lines and reflectors.

Use 2024 Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing layout.

Night work only.
300 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 22
Restripe impacted two way no passing zone
lines and reflectors. Use 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and Specifications. Match
existing layout.

Night work only.
200 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 38
Restripe impacted channelizing lines and
reflectors as per 2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans and Specifications. Match existing
layout.

Night work only.
100 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 39
Restripe impacted bike lane lines as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications.

Match existing layout.

Night work only.
100 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Type VI Arrows
Restripe impacted type VI lane drop arrows
as per 2024 Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing layout.

Night work only.
1 (~42 SF)
Existing Loop
Detectors

Page 85 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Oak Avenue Parkway at
Pembury Way
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling and replacement
of asphalt around manhole.
15’x15’ patch.
225 SF
~5 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping
- Detail 12
Restripe impacted lane lines and
reflectors. Use 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing
layout.
20 LF
Thermoplastic Striping
- Detail 26
Replace impacted left edge line
reflectors as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing
layout.
20 LF
MH

Page 86 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Oak Avenue Parkway - Between
Haverhill Drive and Riley Street
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 30’x50’ milling and
replacement of asphalt at dip.
1,500 SF
~40 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping
- Detail 12
Restripe impacted lane lines and
reflectors. Use 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and Specifications.

Match existing layout.
60 LF
Thermoplastic Striping
- Detail 26
Replace impacted left edge line
reflectors as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and Specifications.

Match existing layout.
60 LF
Thermoplastic Striping
- Detail 39
Restripe impacted bike lane lines
as per 2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans and Specifications. Match
existing layout.
60 LF
Patch

Page 87 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Iron Point Road EB - Between Folsom High
and Barnhill Dr
Item Description Quantity
Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x30’ milling
and replacement of asphalt
around manhole.
600 SF
~8 Tons

Page 88 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Nisenan Park Entryway Improvements Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” milling and
replacement
of asphalt
roadway.
4,000 SF
~60 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping - Ladder
Style Crosswalk
Restripe
impacted
ladder-style
crosswalk as
per 2024
Caltrans
Standard Plans
Section A24F.

Use 24”
stripes, spaced
24” apart.

Match existing
layout.
260 SF
2-Coat Curb
Painting
Repaint red
fire lane curbs
with 2-coat
paint.
140 LF

Page 89 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Black Powder Circle from
Woodsmoke Way to Emigrant Court
Item Description Quantity
Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’
milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manholes and
at dips.
800 SF
~12 Tons
Remove and
Replace ADA
Ramp
Remove and replace
ADA ramp at South
corner of the
intersection of Black
Powder Circle and
Emigrant Court. Match
existing stamped
concrete finish.

Adhere to City
Construction Detail
RD-06 for ramp design.
*City to stain concrete
1 MH
Dip
ADA
Ramp

Page 90 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Black Powder Circle between
Emigrant Court and Russler Lane
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’ milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manhole.
400 SF
~6 Tons
MH

Page 91 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Black Powder Circle between Black
Gold Lane and Woodsmoke Way
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’ milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manhole.
400 SF
~6 Tons
MH

Page 92 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Woodsmoke Way at Pestle Court Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 30’x30’ milling and
replacement of asphalt at
dip.
900 SF
~15 Tons
Patch

Page 93 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Woodsmoke Way between Black
Powder Circle and Soukup Court
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace
Asphalt
2” depth 20’x20’ milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manhole.
400 SF
~6 Tons
MH

Page 94 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

E Natoma St between Esplanade Cir
and Picasso Way
Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace Asphalt 2” depth 60’x60’ milling
and replacement of
asphalt at dip on
southbound and
northbound E Natoma St.
3,600 SF
~50 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 22
Restripe impacted lane
lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
60 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 39
Restripe impacted bike
lane lines as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications. Match
existing layout
60 LF
Patch

Page 95 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Bridge Street from
Figueroa St to
Natoma St
Item Description Quantity
Concrete
Cross Gutter
Install 24” wide concrete
cross gutters across Bridge
St. Use provided “Section
A-A” for gutter design.
60 LF
Mill and
Replace
Asphalt
3” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
roadway.
*Conform to new cross
gutters.
27,000 SF
~550 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Pavement
Markings
Restripe all pavement
markings impacted by
milling and replacement of
asphalt. Use thermoplastic
striping, as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications. Match
existing layout.
3 Stop Bars
4 Stop Legends
1 Crosswalk
(~450 SF)
Section A-A
10” O.C.
2’
2”

Page 96 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Scott Street from Natoma St to Mormon St Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace Asphalt 3” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt.
11,000 SF
~240 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping -
Pavement Markings
Restripe all pavement
markings impacted by
milling and replacement
of asphalt as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans
and Specifications. Match
existing layout and colors.
1 Stop Bar
2 Stop Legends
1 Crosswalk
(~300 SF)

Page 97 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Oak Avenue Parkway Near Coverdale Court Item Description Quantity Mill and Replace Asphalt 2” depth 20’x20’ milling and
replacement of asphalt at
dip.
400 SF
~5 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 12
Restripe impacted lane lines
as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
20 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 26
Restripe impacted left edge
lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
20 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 39
Restripe impacted bike lane
lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
20 LF
Patch

Page 98 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Darrington Drive Item Description Quantity
Mill and
Replace Asphalt
2” depth milling
and replacement
of asphalt at dips
and around
manholes.
10’x10’ patches
around manholes.
6000 SF
~80 Tons
MH
MH
MH
Patch
Patch
Patch
Patch
Patch
Patch
MH
MH

Page 99 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Flood Court Item Description Quantity
Remove &
Replace Curb,
Gutter, &
Sidewalk
Remove & replace
damaged curb,
gutter, and sidewalk
at 104 Flood Ct.
240 SF
Remove & Replace Concrete
Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk

Page 100 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

East Bidwell St Overcrossing Item Description Quantity
Mill and Replace Asphalt 2” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt.
150 SF
~2 Tons
Striping - 2 Coat Paint Restripe impacted 12”
yellow trail center line with
2-coat paint. Match
existing layout.
60 LF

Page 101 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Stonemill Dr Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
around manholes. 10’x10’
area around each
manhole.
400 SF
~6 Tons
MH
MH
MH
MH

Page 102 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Stockman Circle Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling and
replacement of
asphalt around
manholes. 10’x10’
area around each
manhole.
1,400 SF
~20 Tons
Thermoplastic
Pavement
Markings - Stop
Bars
Restripe all stop bars
impacted by milling
and replacement of
asphalt as per 2024
Caltrans Standard
Plans and
Specifications.

Match existing
layout and colors.
1 (~20 SF)
Thermoplastic
Pavement
Markings - STOP
Legends
Restripe all STOP
legends impacted by
milling and
replacement of
asphalt as per 2024
Caltrans Standard
Plans and
Specifications.

Match existing
layout and colors.
1 (~22 SF)

Page 103 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Serpa Ct at Healthy Way
*Night Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace Asphalt 2” depth milling and
replacement of asphalt
roadway.
2,500 SF
~35 Tons
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 22
Restripe center line as per
2024 Caltrans Standard Plans.

Match existing layout.
55 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 38
Restripe lane lines impacted
by milling and replacement of
asphalt as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans. Match
existing layout.
55 LF
Thermoplastic Striping -
Detail 39
Restripe bike lane lines
impacted by milling and
replacement as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans.

Match existing layout.
80 LF
Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings - STOP Legend
Restripe STOP legends as per
2024 Caltrans Standard Plans.

Match existing layout.
2 (~45 SF)
Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings - Stop Bars
Restripe stop bars as per
2024 Caltrans Standard Plans.

Match existing layout.
2 (~25 SF)
Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings - Basic
Crosswalk
Restripe basic crosswalk as
per 2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans. Match existing layout.
80 SF
Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings - Type III Arrow
Restripe left turn arrow as
per 2024 Caltrans Standard
Plans. Match existing layout.
1 (~42 SF)
Mill and
Replace

Page 104 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Cavitt Dr Between Iron Point
Rd and Costco Parking Lot
*Night Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling
and replacement
of asphalt
roadway.
3,200 SF
~45 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail 31
Restripe lane lines
impacted by
milling and
replacement of
asphalt as per
2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans
and Specifications.

Match existing
layout.
350 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail 39
Restripe bike lane
lines impacted by
milling and
replacement of
asphalt as per
2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans
and Specifications.

Match existing
layout.
250 LF
Mill and
Replace

Page 105 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

EB East Bidwell St Between Blue
Ravine Rd and Montrose Dr
*Night Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace
Asphalt
2” depth milling
and replacement
of asphalt
roadway.
28,000 SF
~380 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail 12
Restripe lane lines
impacted by
milling and
replacement of
asphalt as per
2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans
and Specifications.

Match existing
layout.
770 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail 38
Restripe impacted
lane lines, as per
2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans.

Match existing
layout.
620 LF
Thermoplastic
Pavement Markings
- Type III Arrows
Restripe impacted
turn arrows as per
2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans.

Match existing
layout.
3 (~130 SF)
Mill and
Replace

Page 106 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

East Bidwell Street - SE of Oak
Avenue Parkway
Item Description Quantity
Mill & Replace
Asphalt
2” depth, 12’x12’
milling and
replacement of
asphalt around
manhole.
144 SF
~3 Tons
Remove and
Replace Manhole
Frame & Cover
Remove and replace
manhole frame and
cover as per City of
Folsom Standard
Details, Section SD-

28. 1
Thermoplastic
Striping - Detail 12
Restripe lane lines
impacted by milling
and replacement of
asphalt as per 2024
Caltrans Standard
Plans and
Specifications. Match
existing layout.
20 LFMH

Page 107 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Los Cerros Neighborhood Item Description Quantity
Crack Fill Seal existing asphalt cracks according to
2024 Caltrans Standard Specifications,
Section 37-6.
13,000 Pounds
Slurry Seal Type II Slurry Seal:
• 15 lbs/SY Aggregate
• Emulsion at 18% of dry aggregate
*To be performed only AFTER completion of
asphalt repairs, concrete work, and crack
filling.
250 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Pavement
Markings
Restripe all pavement markings impacted by
slurry seal. Match existing layout. Adhere
to 2024 Caltrans Standard Plans, Section
A24.
2 Stop Bars
2 Stop Legends
(~90 SF)

Page 108 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Briggs Ranch Neighborhood Item Description Quantity
Crack Fill Seal existing asphalt
cracks according to
2024 Caltrans Standard
Specifications, Section
37-6.
20,000 Pounds
Slurry Seal Type II Slurry Seal:
• 15 lbs/SY Aggregate
• Emulsion at 18% of
dry aggregate
*To be performed only
AFTER completion of
asphalt repairs,
concrete work, and
crack filling.
350 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 39
Match existing layout.

Adhere to 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications, Section
A24.
2,100 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 39A
Match existing layout.

Adhere to 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications, Section
A24.
700 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Pavement
Markings
Restripe all pavement
markings impacted by
slurry seal. Match
existing layout. Adhere
to 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and
Specifications, Section
A24.
7 Stop Bars
7 Stop Legends
7 Bike Lane Legends
1 Type IV Arrow
1 Type VII Arrow
1 “No. 25” Marking
1 Crosswalk
(~650 SF)

Page 109 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Iron Point Road Between Prairie City Rd & Willow Bridge Dr *Summer Break Construction Required (May 30 - August 6) *Day Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Slurry Seal Type II Slurry Seal:
• 15 lbs/SY Aggregate
• Emulsion at 18% of dry aggregate
• *To be performed only AFTER
completion of asphalt repairs.
400 Tons
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 12
Restripe impacted thermoplastic
lane lines and reflectors as per 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing layout.
16,000 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 38
Restripe impacted thermoplastic
channelizing lines and reflectors as
per 2024 Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications. Match existing layout.
1,400 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 39
Restripe impacted thermoplastic bike
lane lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and Specifications.

Mimic buffered bike lanes to the
east, otherwise match existing
layout.
10,000 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Detail 39A
Restripe impacted thermoplastic bike
lane drop lines as per 2024 Caltrans
Standard Plans and Specifications.

Match existing layout.
400 LF
Thermoplastic
Striping -
Pavement
Markings
Restripe all pavement markings
impacted by slurry seal. Match
existing layout. Adhere to 2024
Caltrans Standard Plans and
Specifications, Section A24.
4 Bike Lane Legends
1 Type III Arrow
11 Type IV Arrows
3 Type VI Arrows
4 Crosswalks
(~1,400 SF)

Page 110 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Lembi Park Parking Lot
*Night Work Only
Item Description Quantity
Crack Fill Seal existing asphalt cracks
according to 2024 Caltrans
Standard Specifications, Section
37-6.
8,000 Pounds
Slurry Seal Type II Slurry Seal:
• 15 lbs/SY Aggregate
• Emulsion at 18% of dry
aggregate
• *All work to be performed in
a minimum of three phases
of similar quantity to
accommodate parking.
150 Tons
2-Coat Paint
Striping -
Pavement
Markings
Restripe all pavement markings
impacted by slurry seal. Use 2-
coat paint. Match existing
layout and colors.
6,000 SF
2-Coat Paint -
Repaint Painted
Curbs
Repaint all painted curbs within
the outlined area. Match
existing layout and colors.
2,000 LF

Page 111 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 112 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.7.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025

AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11363 – A Resolution Updating the City of Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual

FROM: City Clerk's Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 11363 – A Resolution Updating the City of Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City has a longstanding practice of collaborating with lobbyists, as well as state and federal representatives, on legislative matters of importance. To effectively advocate for the City’s legislative priorities, it is essential to establish a clear legislative platform on current issues and to define roles and responsibilities within the advocacy process.

In 2021, the City Council approved its first Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual. This document was subsequently updated in 2023, and staff is now proposing a further update for 2025 to ensure it reflects current issues and aligns with the City's evolving legislative needs.

ANALYSIS

A Legislative Platform defines the City Council's position on current issues that may impact the City. The Advocacy Manual outlines the City's approach to legislative activity and clarifies the roles and responsibilities of individuals involved in the advocacy process.

Page 113 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.
2 To advocate effectively and in the City’s best interest, it is important to establish clear procedures and defined roles. Well-crafted policies ensure that the City's stance on potentially impactful state and federal legislation is clearly communicated to policymakers.

Additionally, a formalized advocacy system is vital for responding quickly when urgent legislative action is required.

Department heads have reviewed the 2023 document and recommended certain adjustments to policy statements. The proposed new or amended policy statements are as follows:

Fire and Emergency Medical Services

1. Support efforts to increase fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition resistant building construction within the City of Folsom.

Libraries

1. Support federal legislation and funding for the Library Services and Technology Act and the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which provide grants to states that support local library initiatives.

2. Support renewed state funding of the California Library Services Act that fosters physical and digital resource sharing among libraries.

3. Support renewed funding for the Building Forward Library Improvement Grant Program that supports local agencies in constructing and maintaining library facilities.

4. Support renewed funding for online educational and workforce development programs.

5. Support legislation that preserves libraries’ right to purchase digital content, including eBooks and eAudiobooks, at the same price as consumers.

6. Support legislation defending freedom to read and unrestricted access to materials that encompass diverse points of view.

POLICY / RULE

The City of Folsom Charter vests the City Council with the powers necessary for the performance of all duties and obligations (§ 2.02).

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The update of the Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual will not result in any direct financial impact. However, actions aligned with the City's strategic use of assets and resources are expected to help control costs, support the implementation of the City Council’s policies and goals, and safeguard the interests of Folsom residents.

Page 114 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.
3 ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11363 – A Resolution Updating the City of Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual

2. Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual - redline of changes to 2023 document

Submitted,

Christa Freemantle, CMC
City Clerk

Page 115 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

Attachment 1

Page 116 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

Resolution No. 11363

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11363

A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE

CITY OF FOLSOM

LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL

WHEREAS, the City has a long-standing practice of collaborating with state and federal legislative representatives; and

WHEREAS, to effectively advocate for the City’s legislative priorities, it is beneficial to clearly define the City’s legislative platform on current issues and to outline roles and responsibilities within the advocacy process; and

WHEREAS, a Legislative Platform establishes the City Council’s positions on key issues that may impact the City; and

WHEREAS, an Advocacy Manual outlines the City’s approach to legislative activities and clarifies individual roles and responsibilities; and

WHEREAS, establishing a well-defined process enables the City to work efficiently with legislative representatives to advocate for the City’s best interests; and

WHEREAS, a Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual were initially approved in 2021 and updated in 2023, and should continue to be regularly updated to reflect current issues;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves the 2025 update to the City of Folsom Legislative Platform and Advocacy Manual.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

Sarah Aquino, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 117 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

Attachment 2

Page 118 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

1 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto
DRAFT 2025 UPDATE – PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL

CITY OF FOLSOM

LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
and

ADVOCACY MANUAL

Adopted: June 2021
Updated: May 2023; April 2025

Page 119 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

2 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM

The City of Folsom is a full-service charter city, providing a wide range of quality programs, services, and amenities to residents, with excellence as a top priority. Protecting the high quality and distinctive character of Folsom calls for an active and engaged legislative advocacy program, which guides how Folsom advocates for its legislative and policy interests by enabling the City Council and City staff to address legislative and regulatory issues promptly.

FOUNDATIONAL LEGISLATIVE PRINCIPLES

The below principles create the foundation for the City’s policy interests.

Preserve Local Control
Preserve and protect the City’s powers to enact local legislation, set policy direction concerning local affairs, and oppose legislation that preempts local authority. Local agencies should preserve authority and accountability for revenues raised and services provided.

Promote Fiscal Stability
Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, financial independence, and preserve the City’s revenue base and maximize local control over local government budgeting. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the county, state or federal governments and make cities more dependent on the county, state, or federal governments for financial stability, such as unfunded mandates or mandated costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits.

Support Diverse Funding Opportunities
Support opportunities for the City to compete for its share of regional, state, and federal funding. Support funding for programs with benefits to air quality, water quality, affordable housing, infrastructure, multi-modal transportation systems, public safety, and public health.

Page 120 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

3 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

Enhance Quality of Life Through Adequate Public Safety

Support criminal justice laws that reinforce public safety protection for Folsom residents. Support legislation that reduces access to firearms for individuals who have been identified as potentially dangerous through civil measures such as extreme risk protection orders or red flag laws. Support measures that protect city authority and ability to deliver local emergency services.

POLICY STATEMENTS

Administration

1. Oppose State or Federal efforts to “borrow” local revenues and encourage the State to find other methods of balancing its budget.

2. Support local government control, rather than the imposition of state, federal or regional mandates upon local governments.

3. Support maximum flexibility for local government in contracting and contract negotiations.

4. Support reasonable legislation that sustains the principles of the open meetings provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act without creating onerous burdens on local government.

5. Support legislation that preserves the ability of local governments to determine the appropriate type of election for their jurisdiction.

6. Oppose any amendment to the redistribution of sales and use taxes which will negatively affect the City and its ability to provide city services and thereby cause a negative fiscal impact.

7. Oppose legislation that creates unfunded mandates or that creates mandates which adversely impact the affordability of City services.

Page 121 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

4 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

Air Quality

8. Support continued funding and incentives to local agencies to work together to improve air quality through the reduction of emissions and advancing economic and technical developments.

9. Oppose any policy or guidelines that restricts the introduction of mixed-use development projects near multi-modal transportation centers.

10. Support policies, guidelines, incentives, and funding for programs with combined benefits to air quality, water quality, housing, infrastructure (including multi-modal transportation systems), and public health.

Building

11. Support policies and guidelines to facilitate options for alternative building methods, materials, and technologies.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

12. Support all efforts to create efficiencies within CEQA and support efforts to limit delays in the local planning and development process.

13. Support legislation that allows state agencies and local governments to continue to retain full authority to reject projects or to condition project approvals and impose mitigation measures.

Economic Development

14. Support international, statewide, regional, and local efforts to attract, retain and provide resources for current and future businesses.

15. Support efforts to provide funding mechanisms for economic development tools including infrastructure investment, housing, and economic development.

Page 122 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

5 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

16. Support policies and programs that encourage working with other cities, counties, and government agencies to jointly leverage resources and assets to create and strengthen economic clusters within the region.

17. Support policies, projects, programs, and regulations for diversifying Folsom’s economic base and facilitating investment that will result in maintaining or growing local jobs and creating an environment that is attractive to current and emerging industries.

18. Support economic development initiatives that preserve and enhance a positive business climate and maintain and grow the business tax base.

Environment

19. Support legislation that provides funding opportunities focused on coordinating sustainable planning in transportation, housing, and economic development.

Fire and Emergency Medical Services

20. Support local control of emergency medical services and ambulance services, including pre-hospital care and transport.

21. Support efforts to streamline and coordinate hazardous materials regulations.

22. Support legislation increasing resources and local authority for the appropriate abatement of homeless camps to mitigate public health risks, including fire risks in open space.

22.23. Support efforts to increase fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition resistant building construction within the City of Folsom.

Human Resources and Risk Management

23.24. Oppose measures that reduce local control over employee relations issues or mandate new or enhanced local government employee benefits.

24.25. Oppose measures that impose compulsory and binding arbitration with respect to employees.

Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Space After: 17 pt, Line
spacing: single, Pattern: Clear (White), Tab stops: Not at 0.56"
Formatted: Font: (Default) Georgia, 11 pt, Font color:

Black

Page 123 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

6 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

Land Use Planning and Housing

25.26. Support efforts to strengthen the legal and fiscal capability of local agencies to prepare, adopt and implement plans for orderly growth, development, beautification, and conservation of local planning areas.

26.27. Support housing measures that promote the development and enhancement of safe and affordable housing and accessible housing within the City for all economic segments of the population.

27.28. Support funding opportunities that are provided to local jurisdictions through statewide bond efforts.

28.29. Monitor local, state, and federal actions related to medical and recreational marijuana regulatory changes.

29.30. Oppose measures to withhold funding dedicated to transportation funding unless proposed housing goals are being met.

30.31. Oppose measures that restrict local discretion over physical development and design in keeping with adopted plans and policies.

31.32. Support measures that recognize and promote preservation of the unique development and design patterns of the City’s Historic District.

32.33. Support legislation increasing resources for services and shelters for those experiencing homelessness.

Libraries

34. Support federal legislation and funding for the Library Services and Technology Act and the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which provide grants to states that support local library initiatives.

35. Support renewed state funding of the California Library Services Act that fosters physical and digital resource sharing among libraries.

36. Support renewed funding for the Building Forward Library Improvement Grant Program that supports local agencies in constructing and maintaining library facilities.

Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

Page 124 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

7 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

37. Support renewed funding for online educational and workforce development programs.

38. Support legislation that preserves libraries’ right to purchase digital content, including eBooks and eAudiobooks, at the same price as consumers.

39. Support legislation defending the freedom to read and unrestricted access to materials that encompass diverse points of view.

Libraries
Support legislation and funding of local public libraries and their programs.

Support funding of the California Library Services Act that fosters physical and digital resource sharing among libraries.

Support legislation that preserves libraries’ right to purchase digital content, including eBooks and eAudiobooks, at the same price as consumers.

Support continued funding of online educational and workforce development programs.

Support legislation defending the freedom to read and unrestricted access to materials that encompass diverse points of view.

Support ongoing funding of the Building Forward Library Improvement Grant Program to supports local agencies in constructing and maintaining library facilities.

Natural Hazards

1.40. Support programs which provide funding to hazard mitigation projects including those identified in a FEMA-approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

2.41. Support funding of state efforts to update and prepare earthquake hazard mapping.

3.42. Support legislation and funding that would create an earthquake early warning system.

Parks and Recreation
Formatted: Font: Georgia, 11 pt
Formatted: List Paragraph, Space After: 0 pt,
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +
Indent at: 0.5", Tab stops: Not at 0.25"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

Page 125 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

8 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

4.43. Oppose efforts that erode funding for vital regional and community services that negatively impact Californian's access to parks, open space, bike lanes, after school programming, senior services, facilities that promote physical activity, protect natural resources, and strengthen safety and security.

5.44. Support legislation and funding opportunities (e.g., federal and state park grant funds, conservancy grant funds, project mitigation funds, etc.) that helps cities build better, stronger communities by providing funding to improve air, water, parks, open space, natural resources, historic preservation, and arts and cultural resources.

6.45. Promote local agency control over policies that recognize the benefits of parks and recreation facilities.

Police Public Safety

7.46. Support measures that encourage community safety and well-being including those which support state and federal reimbursement of homeland security related expenses.

8.47. Support the use of Homeland Security Funds for local law enforcement agencies as first responders.

9.48. Support local control over adult entertainment facilities, problem alcohol establishments and properties where illegal drugs are sold.

10.49. Support local control for the regulation of cultivation, storage, manufacture, transport and use of marijuana.

11.50. Support legislation increasing resources and local authority for abatement of public vandalism, especially graffiti.

12.51. Support use of Homeland Security Funds for local public safety agencies.

13.52. Monitor and review statewide actions to reform the California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act, commonly referred to as POBR.

14.53. Support legislation that preserves non-lethal options for law enforcement officers when apprehending suspects.

Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

Page 126 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

9 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

Solid Waste and Recycling

15.54. Support measures that maintain and enhance local authority and economic flexibility to regulate solid waste and recyclables.

16.55. Oppose any measures that invalidate AB 939 (California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989) indemnification and prevent cities from negotiating indemnification clauses with waste haulers as well as support measures that would mandate state agencies to comply with AB 939 in the same manner as required of cities and counties.

Transportation and Public Works

17.56. Support legislation that would increase funding for local transportation projects including road resurfacing projects, local transit projects, adding bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and trails throughout the city where appropriate, programs that facilitate development-oriented transit and transit-oriented development and enhancing pedestrian safety.

18.57. Support increased State and Federal funding of transportation improvements with regional or sub-regional benefits for all modes of transportation.

19.58. Support protection of dedicated transportation-related tax revenues and enhance the ability of local agencies to finance local transportation programs and facilities.

20.59. Support joint planning efforts and projects with Folsom’s border cities on traffic congestion relief projects.

21.60. Support the reallocation of state or federal transportation dollars to fund local rail and transit projects.

22.61. Support commuter public transportation hubs to be located in areas in populated areas where there will be a large public benefit.

Wastewater
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

Page 127 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

10 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

23.62. Support legislation or regulations that discourage the flushing of wipes through the sewer system unless they meet certain performance standards.

24.63. Support and monitor legislation that would increase the availability of funding for infrastructure improvements and wastewater treatment.

25.64. Oppose legislation or regulations that mandate volumetric pricing of wastewater.

26.65. Support legislation that allows State agencies and local governments to continue to retain full authority to reject projects or to condition project approvals and impose mitigation measures.

Water Quality and Water Supply

27.66. Support and monitor legislation that would increase the availability of, and funding for, water conservation, water use efficiency, water reuse technologies, water recycling, local water storage stormwater capture, and other projects, programs, or technologies that improve water supply or water quality.

28.67. Support the enhancement of a reliable, resilient, and sustainable water supply for California.

29.68. Support measures to increase water supply and improve water quality in the region, including drought relief legislation.

30.69. Support funding opportunities that are provided to local jurisdictions through state or federal legislation.

31.70. Support legislative and regulatory measures that enhance local agencies’ ability to share regional water resources and the ability to implement regional conjunctive use.

32.71. Support legislation that protects the security of, and access to, water rights’ water and Central Valley Project contract water at Folsom Reservoir.

Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

Page 128 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

11 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY MANUAL

PURPOSE
The goals of the City of Folsom’s Legislative Advocacy Program are to:
 Describe the City’s internal procedures related to federal, state, and local advocacy
 Ensure potentially impactful federal, state, and local legislation is identified, analyzed, tracked, and that the City’s legislative position is communicated to legislators

COORDINATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
When City staff learns of governmental action potentially affecting the City, internal communication and coordination to analyze the action begins.

Action can then proceed in either of two ways:

1. If the Council has previously adopted a legislative policy statement relevant to the legislation, the City Manager may act by engaging in established advocacy methods.

2. If there is no relevant legislative policy statement or Council direction related to a potentially impactful bill, if the issue is politically controversial, or if there is significant local interest in the issue, the proposed legislation will be referred to Council for direction.

THE ROLE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council has ultimate responsibility for determining the City’s position on legislative issues. The Council's specific responsibilities include:

1. Establish legislative priorities

2. Meet with the City's state and federal legislative advocates as needed or desired to best represent the interests of Folsom

3. Work with external entities on issues of shared regional policy concern

Page 129 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

12 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

4. Determine positions on resolutions proposed for adoption by the League of California Cities, the National League of Cities, and similar regional entities, as requested

5. Assume an active advocacy role with legislators on behalf of the City. This may include travel, and any such travel will be consistent with current City travel policies

THE ROLE OF THE CITY MANAGER
The City Manager is the central coordinator of the City's legislative program. The City Manager may designate a legislative liaison to assist with coordinating the City’s legislative program. The responsibilities and activities of the City Manager include:

1. Ensuring the consistency of legislative action throughout the City

2. Coordinating contacts and communications with legislators and their staff

3. With departmental assistance, evaluating proposed legislation that may affect the City

4. Disseminating information on public policy items of interest to City departments

5. Directing and overseeing the City’s lobbyists, including setting priorities for action that are consistent with Council direction

6. Preparing advocacy letters for the Mayor or Vice Mayor’s signature. If neither the Mayor nor Vice Mayor are available to sign advocacy letters, the City Manager shall sign on behalf of the City. Copies of the communication will be distributed immediately to the City Council.

7. Serving, as needed, as the liaison to stakeholder groups, legislative offices, and local jurisdictions concerning legislative activities

8. Coordinating, briefing, and providing support to Council members for visits with state and/or federal legislators, as requested

THE ROLE OF CITY DEPARTMENTS
Active departmental participation is essential to the success of the Legislative Program.

Departmental employees can provide technical assistance and unique insight into issues

Page 130 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

13 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto
potentially impacting the City. Responsibilities of the departments include, but are not limited to:

1. Informing the City Manager of policy issues of importance to the City and any specific bills they become aware of that may impact the department

2. Designating key contacts within the department or division who are responsible for evaluating legislation and/or assisting with legislative analysis and advocacy letters

3. Suggesting organizations, individuals, publications, and/or legislators who may be allies in advocating the City's position on certain legislation

CITY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
City employees who are staff or liaison to Council appointed advisory commissions and committees should encourage those bodies to bring to the City Manager’s attention any proposed legislation for which they recommend a position or wish the City Manager to track.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
The Environmental and Water Resources Department carefully monitors legislative developments, due to the heavily and separately regulated nature of the utilities.

Advocacy actions that squarely and solely affect the Environmental and Water Resources Department (i.e.: an increase in utility rates, a change in departmental operations or policies, or additional work for staff of only the Environmental and Water Resources Department) and that conform with approved legislative guidelines, may be approved by the Director of the Environmental and Water Resources Department.

LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY IN SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
The City Council is the official voice of the City of Folsom and the final authority for determining legislative positions. The processes outlined below reflect instances when staff has no prior Council authority, the issue is controversial, or is a current item of significant community interest, or time constraints preclude action by the City Council.

Page 131 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

14 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto
Staff will place the item on a City Council agenda, including a specific bill number, if any, an analysis of the item, and a recommendation if warranted, for Council deliberation. Staff will follow the direction from Council related to the specific item.

If there is no relevant legislative platform guideline and time limits preclude action by the City Council, the Mayor and Vice Mayor shall coordinate with the City Manager to determine the City’s position on proposed legislation and communicate the position as appropriate. Copies of the communication will be distributed to the City Council and presented for ratification at the earliest possible Council meeting. In the event that a majority of the City Council disagrees with the position expressed by the Mayor, Vice Mayor and/or City Council, clarifying communication will be sent as appropriate.

SIGNATURES ON LEGISLATIVE COMMUNICATION
Letters and other communications expressing the City's position will customarily bear the signature of the Mayor. However, if the legislation's principal impact is on the City’s operating procedures, the communication may be signed by the City Manager. In order to keep the Council and others informed of all City communication on legislation, copies of the letters will be distributed to the City Council.

COMMUNICATION WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS
From time to time, Councilmembers may meet with the City’s local, state, and/or federal representatives. These meetings are an important component of building legislative relationships and sharing issues of significance to Folsom. Any meetings or communication with local, state, or federal elected officials must be done in a coordinated way to ensure consistency of messaging, accurate information and record keeping, and sharing of resources. Therefore, any communication with a local, state, or federal elected official or legislative staff shall be coordinated through the City Manager.

Page 132 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

15 | Page LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM AND ADVOCACY MANUAL Redline Draft for 2025 Update

Formatted: Font color: Auto

ADVOCACY METHODS
Drafting position letters is one advocacy tool, best used in conjunction with others. The City Council, City Manager, and lobbyists may use any, or a combination of the below additional advocacy methods:

1. Calls to policymakers, their staff, or legislative committee staff

2. Meeting with legislators and their staff, stakeholders, and other groups active on the same issue or bill

3. Testifying at a committee hearing regarding the City’s position and/or concerns

4. Building coalitions with like-minded entities
####

Page 133 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 134 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11367-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. for the Lease of 405 Natoma Station Drive, APN 072-0850-029-0000

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council Approve Resolution No. 11367-A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. for the Lease of 405 Natoma Station Drive, APN 072-0850-029-0000.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. entered into a 10-year lease agreement with two optional extensions of 5 years, commencing on April 1, 2022.

Kids Inc.(tenant) Rent Per Month:

April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 - $20,000
April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 - $20,600
April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025 - $21,218.

On March 6, 2025, the City received a letter from the tenant asking that the City reduce its monthly rent amount by $2,000. The justification for the rent reduction was related to the property taxes that the tenant needs to pay for the facility. Although the lease agreement mentions that the tenant would be responsible for the taxes, the tenant indicates that they didn’t realize it was their responsibility. The tenant has spent a significant amount of money to make improvements to the building and the property tax cost has become burdensome for the tenant.

Page 135 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.
2 Due to the tenant’s significant investment and the additional property tax burden the tenant has requested the city consider a $2,000 monthly reduction in rent. Staff recommend that the council grant this reduction.

POLICY / RULE

The City Manager shall receive City Council authority to execute contracts in excess of $75,049

ANALYSIS

The City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. entered into a 10-year lease agreement with two optional extensions of 5 years, commencing on April 1, 2022. Since entering into the lease, the lessee has made several improvements to the city-owned facility and has more improvements planned in the future. Improvements include:

Completed
 Nearly $200,000 in building improvements to update the facility to better serve children and families.
 Landscape care due to issues between the facility and the city landscape contractor.  Landscape shrub removal to enhance safety.

Planned
 Painting of the building exterior.
 Re-striping the parking lot.
 Replacement of rain gutters.

The lessee has taken great care of the facility and is up to date on payments.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The current monthly rate of $21,218 equates to annual revenues of $254,616. The $2,000 monthly reduction will reduce the annual revenues by $24,000. The City will still receive $230,616 annually under this agreement. The new monthly rental rate will still have an annual increase of 3% per year.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed lease of an existing public facility is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11367-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro, DBA Kids Inc. for the Lease of 405 Natoma Station Drive, APN 072-0850-029-0000

2. Lease agreement dated December 15, 2021

Page 136 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.
3 3. Letter from Kelli Vaccaro dated March 6, 2025

4. Sample rate schedule

Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez, Parks & Recreation Director

Page 137 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Attachment 1

Page 138 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Resolution No. 11367

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11367

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND KELLI VACCARO, DBA KIDS INC, FOR THE LEASE OF 405 NATOMA STATION DRIVE, APN 072-0850-029-0000

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom and Kelli Vaccaro , DBA Kids Inc. entered into a n agreement to lease the city owned facility at 405 Natoma Station Drive, commencing on April 1, 2022; and

WHEREAS, since the start of the lease the lessee has made substantial impr ovements to the city owned facility; and

WHEREAS, the lessee has requested a reduction of rent in the amount of $2,000 monthly; and

WHEREAS, staff believe the request is reasonable and will result in further enhancements to the city owned facility; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to the lease agreement and reduce the monthly rent by $2,0 00 effective May 1, 2025, and include a 3% escalator each year ef fective April 1, 2026 and every year thereafter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 139 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Attachment 2

Page 140 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 141 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 142 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 143 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 144 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 145 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 146 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 147 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 148 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 149 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 150 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 151 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 152 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 153 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 154 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 155 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 156 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 157 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 158 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Attachment 3

Page 159 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 160 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 161 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 162 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 163 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 164 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 165 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 166 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 167 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 168 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 169 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 170 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 171 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 172 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 173 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 174 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 175 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 176 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 177 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 178 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 179 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 180 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 181 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 182 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 183 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 184 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 185 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 186 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 187 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 188 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Page 189 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Attachment 4

Page 190 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

April 1, 2022 -
March 31, 2023 $ 2.00 / RSF 20,000$ plus NNN April 1, 2023 -
March 31, 2024 $ 2.06 / RSF 20,600$ plus NNN April 1, 2024 -
March 31, 2025 $ 2.12 / RSF 21,218$ plus NNN April 1, 2025 -
March 31, 2026 $ 2.19 / RSF 21,855$ plus NNN April 1, 2026 -
March 31, 2027 $ 2.25 / RSF 22,510$ plus NNN April 1, 2027 -
March 31, 2028 $ 2.32 / RSF 23,185$ plus NNN April 1, 2028 -
March 31, 2029 $ 2.39 / RSF 23,881$ plus NNN April 1, 2029 -
March 31, 2030 $ 2.46 / RSF 24,597$ plus NNN April 1, 2030 -
March 31, 2031 $ 2.53 / RSF 25,335$ plus NNN April 1, 2031 -
March 31, 2032 $ 2.61 / RSF 26,095$ plus NNN 2,751,331$
Time Period
April 1, 2022 -
March 31, 2023 $ 2.00 / RSF 20,000$ plus NNN April 1, 2023 -
March 31, 2024 $ 2.06 / RSF 20,600$ plus NNN April 1, 2024 -
March 31, 2025 $ 2.12 / RSF 21,218$ plus NNN April 1, 2025 -
April 30, 2025 $ 2.19 / RSF 21,855$ plus NNN May 1, 2025 -
March 31, 2026 $ 1.92 / RSF 19,218$ plus NNN April 1, 2026 -
March 31, 2027 $ 1.98 / RSF 19,795$ plus NNN April 1, 2027 -
March 31, 2028 $ 2.04 / RSF 20,388$ plus NNN April 1, 2028 -
March 31, 2029 $ 2.10 / RSF 21,000$ plus NNN April 1, 2029 -
March 31, 2030 $ 2.16 / RSF 21,630$ plus NNN April 1, 2030 -
March 31, 2031 $ 2.23 / RSF 22,279$ plus NNN April 1, 2031 -
March 31, 2032 $ 2.29 / RSF 22,947$ plus NNN 2,511,538.92$
Current
Lease total
Original Total
Proposed
$/RSF/MO $/MONTH

Page 191 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 192 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.9.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11368-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Pour Leadership Inc. DBA Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew for the Lease of Retail Space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070-0052-023-0000

FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 11368-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Pour Leadership Inc. DBA Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew for the Lease of Retail Space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070-0052-023-0000

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The parking garage and retail space were constructed in 2008 and transferred from the Redevelopment Agency to the City of Folsom in 2012. In 2014 the city entered into a 3-year lease of the retail space to the Folsom Historic Society for their Museum of Wonder and Delight.

The lease between the city and the Folsom Historic Society was for an amount of $1 per month for the three-year term. After the expiration of the Folsom Historic Society lease, the site sat vacant for over three years.

In June of 2021 the city posted a request for proposals and received three proposals. Six staff and one member of the Folsom Chamber of Commerce reviewed and ranked the proposals. Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse Brew scored the highest on the review. The City Council approved entering into a 10-year lease agreement with two optional extensions of 5 years, commencing on July 5, 2023, the first six months of the agreement were rent free to allow the lessee to obtain permits to make facility improvements, followed by a 10-month rent free period for a total of 16 months’ rent free. The lessee has been working through the permitting and buildout process which has added additional time to the buildout of the facility. There was extra engineering and testing necessary due to the size of equipment that will be housed in the facility and the post and tension

Page 193 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
2 slab that makes up the floor of the facility. Uncle Charlie’s has been working through the building process since their original submittal in March of 2024. Attachment 4 shows the permitting and plan review process.

The lessee has requested the city extend the rent-free period to 24 months. The lessee has paid rent starting after their rent-free period for the months of November, December, January, and February for a total of $26,600. They are requesting that this initial rent be applied to future rent and be credited to the months of July, August, September, October, and begin paying regular rent in November 2025.

POLICY / RULE
The City Manager shall receive City Council authority to execute contracts in excess of $75,049.

ANALYSIS
Based on the rental history and the amount of time the site has sat vacant, there is a need for a strong long-standing business to further complement the garage and plaza area in the Historic District. After reviewing the request seen in attachment 3, staff agree that an extension of the rent-free period is reasonable and warranted. Staff recommends that the short-term reductions is warranted in order to help this business get off the ground.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
This request will delay the collection of rent for an additional 8-month period. The City has never received more than $1 to rent out this facility and believes that it is worth waiting a few extra months to start receiving consistent rental payments for the facility. Once the rental payments begin the City will receive annual payments starting at $75,600 a year escalating each year thereafter.

Eight months of rent at $6,650 a month totals $53,200. The long-term lease is expected to bring well over a million dollars in rent revenue to the City of the first 10 years of the agreement.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11368-A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Lease Agreement Between the City of Folsom and Pour Leadership Inc. DBA Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew for the Lease of Retail Space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, APN 070-0052-023-0000

2. Lease agreement dated July 5, 2023

3. Email from Taryn Grows dated February 25, 2025

4. Planning workflow

5. Sample rate schedule

Page 194 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
3 Submitted,

Kelly Gonzalez, Parks & Recreation Director

Page 195 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Attachment 1

Page 196 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Resolution No. 11368

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11368

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND POUR LEADERSHIP INC. DBA UNCLE CHARLIE’S FIREHOUSE & BREW FOR THE LEASE OF RETAIL SPACE AT 905 LEIDESDORFF STREET, APN 070- 0052-023-0000

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom and Pour Leadership Inc. DBA Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew entered into an agreement to lease the city owned re tail space at 905 Leidesdorff Street, commencing on July 5, 2025; and

WHEREAS, the lessee is working to make improvements to the city owned facility; and

WHEREAS, the lessee has requested an extension of the rent-free period; and

WHEREAS, staff believe the request is reasonable and will result in further enhancements to the city owned facility; and

WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to the lease agreement to extend the rent free period to July of 2025, and use previously received rent to pay the future rent for the months of July, August, September, October, and the lessee begin paying regular rent in November 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

__________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 197 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Attachment 2

Page 198 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 199 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 200 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 201 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 202 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 203 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 204 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 205 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 206 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 207 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 208 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 209 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 210 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 211 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 212 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 213 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 214 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 215 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 216 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 217 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 218 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 219 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 220 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 221 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 222 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 223 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 224 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 225 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 226 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 227 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 228 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 229 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 230 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 231 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Page 232 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Attachment 3

Page 233 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
1 Jamison Larson
From: Taryn Grows <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:42 PM
To: Kelly Gonzalez
Cc: Dan Haverty
Subject: Re: UCFB Amended Lease Request
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

You are all fantastic. This truly takes a village to raise a business ;-)

Cheers!
Taryn

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:19 PM Kelly Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Taryn,
I have everything we need to move forward with your request. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions. You can get ahold of me on my cell phone 916 870-6165.

Kelly

Kelly Gonzalez
Parks & Recreation Director
City of Folsom
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630
[email protected]
o:916-461-6635
www.folsom.ca.us

Page 234 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
2 From: Taryn Grows <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 8:15 PM
To: Dan Haverty <[email protected]>
Cc: Kelly Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: UCFB Amended Lease Request

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dan your support is greatly appreciated!

Kelly, we look forward to hearing back :-)

Please let me know if you require anything further

Cheers!
Taryn and Charlie

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:13 PM Dan Haverty <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you, Taryn. I've spoken with our City Attorney, Parks Director and the Mayor about your circumstance. I've given Kelly Gonzalez authority to work with the City Attorney to bring your ask to a Closed Session Council Meeting. We all wish to support you and your father in the start-up of your business. As I am leaving City service soon, I ask that you direct future inquiries to Kelly, who will be taking point on your Amended Lease Agreement.

Kindly, Dan

From: Taryn Grows <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:30 AM

Page 235 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
3 To: Dan Haverty <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Gagliardi <[email protected]>
Subject: UCFB Amended Lease Request

[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Dan-

Thank you for the call.

Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew is requesting a lease amendment for a 24 month extension on free rent versus the original 16months.

We are requesting our Lease that was signed July 2022 and gave us 10 months free rent with an additional 6 months to get our building permit before we started paying rent, Which started November 2024- be extended to 24 free rent which would start July 2025.

We are asking for a credit of the $6650 per month we have paid for November, December, January, February, for a total of ($26,600) be credited to July, August, September, October and restart paying in November 2025.

We feel with the delayed buildout and monies already paid we are running risk of burning through capital before we are open. We are asking the city to help meet us with this request so we can be successful and thriving and good stewards of the space and as the city’s tenant.

Cheers!
Taryn Grows
Co-founder
Uncle Charlie’s Firehouse & Brew

--
Cheers!
Charlie & Taryn, Founders
Uncle Charlie's Firehouse & Brew
905 Leidesdorff St, Suite 100 Folsom, CA (opening Summer 2025)

Page 236 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.
4 Cell: 916-835-8188

--
Cheers!
Charlie & Taryn, Founders
Uncle Charlie's Firehouse & Brew
905 Leidesdorff St, Suite 100 Folsom, CA (opening Summer 2025) Cell: 916-835-8188

Page 237 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Attachment 4

Page 238 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

TASK

TASK STATUS

REVIEW STATUS
CYCLE

ASSIGNED

ACCEPTED

COMPLETED
GROUP
USER

SUB TOTAL
Upload and Submit Task
Completed
0 03/20/2024
10:08 AM
03/22/2024
02:52 PM
03/22/2024
03:06 PM
Applicant
Curt Taras
2 days 5 hrs
Prescreen Review Task
Completed
0 03/22/2024
03:06 PM
03/27/2024
09:22 AM
03/27/2024
09:57 AM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
2 days 19 hrs
Assign Reviewers Task
Completed
0 03/27/2024
09:57 AM
03/27/2024
09:58 AM
03/27/2024
10:03 AM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
0 days 0 hrs
Structural Department Review cycle #1
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
03/27/2024
10:21 AM
04/25/2024
11:17 AM
Structural
Allison Konwinski
21 days 1 hr
Fire Department Review cycle #1
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
03/27/2024
01:25 PM
04/02/2024
08:18 AM
Fire
Michelle Toledo
3 days 22 hrs
Planning Department Review cycle #1
Reassigned
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
03/27/2024
10:12 AM
Planning
Nathan Stroud
0 days 0 hrs
Arborist Department Review cycle #1
Completed
Approved
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
04/29/2024
09:01 AM
04/29/2024
12:45 PM
Arborist
Aimee Nunez
23 days 2.5 hrs
Engineering Department Review cycle #1
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
03/27/2024
03:00 PM
04/01/2024
09:49 AM
Engineering
Daniel Wolfe
2 days 24 hrs
Building Department Review cycle #1
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
10:03 AM
03/27/2024
10:22 AM
04/25/2024
11:17 AM
Building
Allison Konwinski
21 days 1 hr
Planning Department Review cycle #1
(Reassigned from Nathan Stroud)
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
10:12 AM
03/27/2024
01:28 PM
04/02/2024
08:54 AM
Planning
Steven Banks
3 days 22.5 hrs
Fire - Contract Reviewers Department
Review cycle #1
Completed
Corrections Required
1 03/27/2024
01:25 PM
03/28/2024
07:45 AM
04/01/2024
02:51 PM
Fire - Contract
Reviewers
Augie Cerdan
3 days 1.5 hrs
Review Type:

Building
Number of Files:
89 Project Name:

COAL24-07304
Workflow:

COAL24-07304 - Building - 3/20/2024 10:08:22 AM
Total Review Comments:
41 Time Elapsed:
239 days 0.5 hrs
Time with Jurisdiction:
57 days 23 hrs
Time with Applicant:
181 days 1.5 hrs
Completed Submission (Prescreen):
4 days 24 hrs
Completed Plan Review:
239 days 0.5 hrs
report from

Project
Dox
by
Avolve Software
Plan Review - Workflow Routing Slip
Report Generated:
04/02/2025 07:22 AM

Page 239 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

TASK

TASK STATUS

REVIEW STATUS
CYCLE

ASSIGNED

ACCEPTED

COMPLETED
GROUP
USER

SUB TOTAL
Review Complete Task
Completed
1 04/29/2024
12:45 PM
04/29/2024
01:43 PM
04/29/2024
01:43 PM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
0 days 1 hr
Respond and Resubmit Task
Completed
1 04/29/2024
01:43 PM
04/30/2024
11:39 AM
06/19/2024
10:22 AM
Applicant
Curt Taras
35 days 20.5 hrs
Resubmit Received Task
Completed
1 06/19/2024
10:23 AM
06/20/2024
10:34 AM
06/20/2024
05:45 PM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
1 day 7.5 hrs
Fire Department Review cycle #2
Completed
Corrections Required
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
06/21/2024
09:20 AM
07/03/2024
02:02 PM
Fire
Michelle Toledo
8 days 20.5 hrs
Engineering Department Review cycle #2
Completed
Approved
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
06/27/2024
10:08 AM
07/01/2024
03:14 PM
Engineering
Daniel Wolfe
6 days 21.5 hrs
Planning Department Review cycle #2
Reassigned
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
06/28/2024
04:14 PM
Planning
Steven Banks
5 days 22.5 hrs
Fire - Contract Reviewers Department
Review cycle #2
Completed
Corrections Required
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
06/21/2024
06:08 AM
06/26/2024
07:18 AM
Fire - Contract
Reviewers
Augie Cerdan
3 days 13.5 hrs
Structural Department Review cycle #2
Completed
Corrections Required
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
07/03/2024
10:34 AM
07/03/2024
10:35 AM
Structural
Allison Konwinski
8 days 17 hrs
Building Department Review cycle #2
Completed
Corrections Required
2 06/20/2024
05:46 PM
06/21/2024
10:21 AM
07/02/2024
07:02 AM
Building
Allison Konwinski
7 days 13.5 hrs
Planning Department Review cycle #2
(Reassigned from Steven Banks)
Completed
Approved
2 06/28/2024
04:14 PM
07/01/2024
04:54 PM
07/03/2024
10:56 AM
Planning
Jessica Brandt
2 days 18.5 hrs
Review Complete Task
Completed
2 07/03/2024
02:02 PM
07/09/2024
03:44 PM
07/09/2024
03:44 PM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
3 days 1.5 hrs
Respond and Resubmit Task
Completed
2 07/09/2024
03:44 PM
07/09/2024
04:50 PM
02/06/2025
04:15 PM
Applicant
Curt Taras
142 days 0.5 hrs
Resubmit Received Task
Completed
2 02/06/2025
04:15 PM
02/10/2025
02:55 PM
02/10/2025
03:07 PM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
1 day 23 hrs
Building Department Review cycle #3
Completed
Approved
3 02/10/2025
03:07 PM
02/13/2025
11:20 AM
02/26/2025
12:12 PM
Building
Allison Konwinski
10 days 21 hrs
Structural Department Review cycle #3
Completed
Approved
3 02/10/2025
03:07 PM
02/13/2025
11:20 AM
02/26/2025
12:13 PM
Structural
Allison Konwinski
10 days 21 hrs
report from

Project
Dox
by
Avolve Software
Plan Review - Workflow Routing Slip
Report Generated:
04/02/2025 07:22 AM

Page 240 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

TASK

TASK STATUS

REVIEW STATUS
CYCLE

ASSIGNED

ACCEPTED

COMPLETED
GROUP
USER

SUB TOTAL
Fire Department Review cycle #3
Completed
Approved
3 02/10/2025
03:07 PM
02/11/2025
07:52 AM
03/04/2025
08:34 AM
Fire
Michelle Toledo
14 days 17.5 hrs
Fire - Contract Reviewers Department
Review cycle #3
Reassigned
3 02/10/2025
03:07 PM
02/27/2025
11:01 AM
Fire - Contract
Reviewers
Augie Cerdan
11 days 20 hrs
Fire - Contract Reviewers Department
Review cycle #3 (Reassigned from Augie
Cerdan)
Completed
Approved
3 02/27/2025
11:01 AM
02/27/2025
11:03 AM
03/03/2025
04:22 PM
Fire - Contract
Reviewers
4LEAF Inc.
2 days 5.5 hrs
Review Complete Task
Completed
3 03/04/2025
08:34 AM
03/04/2025
11:37 AM
03/04/2025
11:37 AM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
0 days 3 hrs
Awaiting Final Payment Task
Completed
3 03/04/2025
11:37 AM
03/04/2025
11:38 AM
03/04/2025
01:16 PM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
0 days 1.5 hrs
Outstanding Items
Completed
3 03/04/2025
01:16 PM
03/05/2025
08:34 AM
03/05/2025
12:37 PM
Applicant
Curt Taras
0 days 23.5 hrs
Awaiting Final Payment Task
Completed
3 03/05/2025
12:37 PM
03/07/2025
10:27 AM
03/07/2025
10:27 AM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
1 day 22 hrs
Scheduled Batch Stamp
Completed
3 03/07/2025
10:27 AM
03/07/2025
10:27 AM
03/07/2025
10:38 AM
Coordinator
Layla Hubbard
0 days 0 hrs
Total Completion Time:
239 days 1.5 hrs
report from

Project
Dox
by
Avolve Software
Plan Review - Workflow Routing Slip
Report Generated:
04/02/2025 07:22 AM

Page 241 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Attachment 5

Page 242 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Requested
Rental Fees
Waiver
Change in
Rental
Revenue
Total Total Difference
Time Period Annual Rent Annual Rent Annual Rent
Months 1 - 10 No Change
Year 1 $1.75 / RSF $6,300 plus NNN 75,600$ 25,200$ (50,400)$ Year 2 $2.50 / RSF $9,000 plus NNN 108,000$ 108,000$ No Change Year 3 $2.58 / RSF $9,270 plus NNN 111,240$ 111,240$ No Change Year 4 $2.65 / RSF $9,548 plus NNN 114,577$ 114,577$ No Change Year 5 $2.73 / RSF $9,835 plus NNN 118,015$ 118,015$ No Change Year 6 $2.81 / RSF $10,130 plus NNN 121,555$ 121,555$ No Change Year 7 $2.90 / RSF $10,433 plus NNN 125,202$ 125,202$ No Change Year 8 $2.99 / RSF $10,746 plus NNN 128,958$ 128,958$ No Change Year 9 $3.07 / RSF $11,069 plus NNN 132,826$ 132,826$ No Change Year 10 $3.17 / RSF $11,401 plus NNN 136,811$ 136,811$ No Change Year 11 $3.26 / RSF $11,743 plus NNN 140,916$ 140,916$ No Change Year 12 $3.36 / RSF $12,095 plus NNN 145,143$ 145,143$ No Change Year 13 $3.46 / RSF $12,458 plus NNN 149,497$ 149,497$ No Change Year 14 $3.56 / RSF $12,832 plus NNN 153,982$ 153,982$ No Change Year 15 $3.67 / RSF $13,217 plus NNN 158,602$ 158,602$ No Change Year 16 $3.78 / RSF $13,613 plus NNN 163,360$ 163,360$ No Change Year 17 $3.89 / RSF $14,022 plus NNN 168,260$ 168,260$ No Change Year 18 $4.01 / RSF $14,442 plus NNN 173,308$ 173,308$ No Change Year 19 $4.13 / RSF $14,876 plus NNN 178,508$ 178,508$ No Change Year 20 $4.26 / RSF $15,322 plus NNN 183,863$ 183,863$ No Change TOTAL 2,788,222$ 2,737,822$ (50,400)$
Difference
Time Period Annual Rent
Months 1 - 10
Year 1 $0.88 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 2 $1.25 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 3 $1.29 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 4 $1.33 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 5 $1.37 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 6 $1.41 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 7 $1.45 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 8 $1.49 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 9 $1.54 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 10 $1.58 / RSF $0 plus NNN -$ -$ No Change Year 11 $1.63 / RSF $326 plus NNN 3,914$ 3,914$ No Change Year 12 $1.68 / RSF $336 plus NNN 4,032$ 4,032$ No Change Year 13 $1.73 / RSF $346 plus NNN 4,153$ 4,153$ No Change Year 14 $1.78 / RSF $356 plus NNN 4,277$ 4,277$ No Change Year 15 $1.84 / RSF $367 plus NNN 4,406$ 4,406$ No Change Year 16 $1.89 / RSF $378 plus NNN 4,538$ 4,538$ No Change Year 17 $1.95 / RSF $389 plus NNN 4,674$ 4,674$ No Change Year 18 $2.01 / RSF $401 plus NNN 4,814$ 4,814$ No Change Year 19 $2.07 / RSF $413 plus NNN 4,959$ 4,959$ No Change Year 20 $2.13 / RSF $426 plus NNN 5,107$ 5,107$ No Change TOTAL 44,873$ 44,873$ No Change Difference
Time Period Annual Rent
Months 1 - 10
Year 1 $0.88 / RSF $350 plus NNN 4,200$ 1,400$ 2,800$ Year 2 $1.25 / RSF $500 plus NNN 6,000$ 6,000$ -$ Year 3 $1.29 / RSF $515 plus NNN 6,180$ 6,180$ -$ Year 4 $1.33 / RSF $530 plus NNN 6,365$ 6,365$ -$ Year 5 $1.37 / RSF $546 plus NNN 6,556$ 6,556$ -$ Year 6 $1.41 / RSF $563 plus NNN 6,753$ 6,753$ -$ Year 7 $1.45 / RSF $580 plus NNN 6,956$ 6,956$ -$ Year 8 $1.49 / RSF $597 plus NNN 7,164$ 7,164$ -$ Year 9 $1.54 / RSF $615 plus NNN 7,379$ 7,379$ -$ Year 10 $1.58 / RSF $633 plus NNN 7,601$ 7,601$ -$ Year 11 $1.63 / RSF $652 plus NNN 7,829$ 7,829$ -$ Year 12 $1.68 / RSF $672 plus NNN 8,063$ 8,063$ -$ Year 13 $1.73 / RSF $692 plus NNN 8,305$ 8,305$ -$ Year 14 $1.78 / RSF $713 plus NNN 8,555$ 8,555$ -$ Year 15 $1.84 / RSF $734 plus NNN 8,811$ 8,811$ -$ Year 16 $1.89 / RSF $756 plus NNN 9,076$ 9,076$ -$ Year 17 $1.95 / RSF $779 plus NNN 9,348$ 9,348$ -$ Year 18 $2.01 / RSF $802 plus NNN 9,628$ 9,628$ -$ Year 19 $2.07 / RSF $826 plus NNN 9,917$ 9,917$ -$ Year 20 $2.13 / RSF $851 plus NNN 10,215$ 10,215$ -$ 154,901$ 152,101$ (2,800)$
Total Rental Income TOTAL 2,987,996$ 2,934,796$ (53,200)$ $/RSF/MO $/MONTH
No Rent No Rent
Patio
$/RSF/MO $/MONTH
No Rent No Rent
Storage in Garage
Approved and Proposed Rental Fees for Lease Space at
905 Leidesdorff by Uncle Charlie's Firehouse & Brew
Approved by City Council
Base Lease
$/RSF/MO $/MONTH
No Rent No Rent

Page 243 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

This page is intentionally left blank
to facilitate double-sided printing
and minimize paper use.

Page 244 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.10.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11369 - A Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit Grant Applications to the Sacramento Area Council of
Governments for the 2024 -25 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding Round

FROM: Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

The Public Works and Parks & Recreation Departments recommend that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 11369 - A Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit Grant Applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the 2024 -25 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding Round.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, is responsible for preparing and submitting the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), which programs each county’s share of STIP funds.

In February 2024, SACOG adopted a new STIP framework that split county shares into two categories:

1. A regional pool for competitive projects across all counties (10%), and

2. Individual intra-county competitive programs, which would manage the majority (90%) of each county’s share.

In October 2024, SACOG formalized funding guidelines under this revised framework, emphasizing collaborative planning among regiona l stakeholders. Most recently, in February 2025, SACOG issued a call for projects, confirmed STIP fund estimates, and reaffirmed that

Page 245 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.
90% of each county’s STIP share would be allocated through intra -competitive county programs.

In response to SACOG’s revised framework for STIP funding, the Sacramento Transportation Authority has proposed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to fulfill the requests among local transportation agencies within Sacramento County to strategically coordinate a collectively beneficial approach to the 2025 SACOG Four-County STIP Funding Program and future funding programs to reduce the number of applications submitted, improve coordination, and to increase the funding predictability within their respective 90% county share allocation. Through the partnership, Member Agencies increase predictability in how much funding will be available each funding cycle. This MOU will be presented to City Council for approval in the near future.

The member agencies for this MOU consist of the County of Sacramento, the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, Rancho Cordova, Isleton, and Sacramento, the Capital SouthEast Connector JPA, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Paratransit Inc., Sacramento Regional Transi t District, and San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission.

The anticipated 2025 allocations for Individual intra-county competitive programs based on population (75%) and lane miles (25%) are as follows:

Folsom $ 1,274,000
Citrus Heights $ 1,109,000
Elk Grove $ 2,400,000
Galt $ 363,000
Isleton $ 100,000
Rancho Cordova $ 1,168,000
Sacramento $ 6,889,000
Sacramento County $ 8,712,000

The Empire Ranch Interchange Project was considered for this funding opportunity however it was determined that the project does not meet the criteria for STIP funding due to the project’s classification as a capacity-increasing project as well as the funding criteria that any project funded through this STIP funding round must be scheduled t o begin construction no later than June 2029. Staff does not think this is a reasonable schedule based on recent attempts to obtain Caltrans approval and the anticipated timeline for project design. If Council chooses to direct staff to submit a funding request for the Empire Ranch Interchange project , and the project is deemed to not meet the eligibility criteria, there would be no risk of losing these available funds however the funds wouldn’t be available to apply for again until the 2027 STIP call for projects.

The Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department are proposing to submit grant applications for this STIP funding round for the two projects listed below. Staff attended

Page 246 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.
a pre-application meeting with SACOG staff and received positive feedback that both projects below align well with the STIP guidelines.

Riley Street Complete Streets (Public Works)
On Riley Street, between E ast Bidwell Street and Wales Drive: This pro ject will consist of complete street improvements that will include transitioning from a four lane, two-way street to a single lane in each direction, creation of dedicated bike facilities, pedestrian improvements, and the development of four roundabouts at E ast Bidwell Street, Walmart/Kohls Driveway, Glenn Drive, a nd Wales Drive. The implementation of roundabouts, bicycle lanes, and crosswalks in the project area will slow traffic, reducing the risk for pedestrians and allowing safer vehicle access into and out of the commercial properties along the corridor. These roundabouts were identified and received the highest composite benefit scores in the Roundabout Screening Evaluation that was recently presented to City Council. The requested funding for this project would be utilized for the Project Approval/Environmental Document Phase.

Highway 50 Class I Trail Undercrossing & Trail Improvements (Parks & Recreation) Located along the Sacramento -Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority (SPTC-JPA) railroad track corridor between Iron Point Road and the southside of the US Highway 50 overcrossing of Old Placerville Road.

The Highway 50 Class I Trail Undercrossing & Trail Improvements project would complete the critical gap in Folsom's only planned Class I trail connection to the Folsom Plan Area (FPA). The project would connect the existing Class I trail that runs from Iron Point Road to just before the Highway 50 undercrossing to the existing trail that parallels Old Placerville Road on the south side of Highway 50. Currently , there is no Class I trail facility under Highway 50.

The project would also improve the existing trail that runs from Iron Point Road to just before Highway 50 undercrossing (parallels the S PTC-JPA railroad tracks) and the trail adjacent to the In -N-Out parking lot. Currently, the existing Class I trail parallel to the tracks begins approximately 175 feet east of the East Bidwell/Iron Point intersection crosswalks requiring bicyclists and pedestrians to use a narrow sidewalk to access the Class I trail. The proposed trail improvements include widening the existing Class I trail (10 feet to 12 feet), adding 2 - foot shoulders on each side, and constructing a new Class I trail connection from the existing Class I trail, parallel to the railroad tracks, to the existing trail that runs behind In -N-Out, connecting trail users to the East Bidwell sidewalk approximately 80 feet south of the East Bidwell/Iron Point intersection crosswalks. The staging ar ea for bicyclists and pedestrians adjacent to the East Bidwell/Iron Point intersection crosswalks would be widened to accommodate additional trail users queuing to cross the intersection.

Page 247 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.

POLICY / RULE

The City Council adopted Resolution No. 10405 Amending Financial Policies of the City of Folsom regarding grant administration on April 14, 2020. Section D – Intergovernmental Revenues, Paragraph A – Grant Applications states, “Grant application shall be the responsibility of the department seeking the grant. Grant applications that require an expenditure of funds by the City of less than or equal to the City Manager contract authority amount may be approved by the City Manager prior to submittal to the grantor. All other grant applications, including any requiring an ongoing commitment of resources or staff, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to submittal. In circumstances where it is not possible for the City Council to approve the grant application prior to submittal, the City Manager may approve the application subject to the City Council ratification as soon as practicable to do so.

Requests to the City Council or the City Manager for approval of a grant application shall identify anticipated long -term maintenance and/or renovation costs, required City matching funds, and additional personnel that may be needed if the grant is awarded for a capital project.

Concerning grants for staffing, the source of funds for long -term staffing after the expiration of the grant shall also be identified in the request for approval of the grant application.

All grant applications on behalf of the Cit y shall be reviewed by the Finance Director before submittal to the City Council or the grantor.”

ANALYSIS

Staff from the Public Works and Parks & Recreation Departments collaborated on priority projects that meet STIP funding eligibility to compile a list of candidate projects for possible grant funds.

Staff is requesting that Council provide prioritization between these two projects, which could consist of proceeding with only one of the projects or a split funding request (e.g., 60/40), with the understanding that the most Folsom can receive this funding round is $1,274,000. Staff is requesting approval to submit both projects for funding consideration, proposing a request of $974,000 for the Riley Street Complete Streets project and a $300,000 request for the Highway 50 Class I Trail Undercrossing and Trail Improvements project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

There is no direct financial impact associated with this action at this point. Should the City be awarded grant funding for any of these projects, the City would be required to provide local matching funds of approximately 11 % of the amount granted. Once any of the projects are awarded grant funding staff will return to Council to identify the source of the match required, request Council accept the grant award, and request an increase to revenue estimates and appropriations for the amount awarded..

Page 248 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

ATTACHMENT

Resolution No. 11369 - A Resolution Authorizing Staff to Submit Grant Applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the 2024-25 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding Round.

Submitted,

Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Kelly Gonzalez, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR

Page 249 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.

Resolution No. 11369

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11369

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE 2024-25

STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) FUNDING ROUND

WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the metropolitan planning organization responsible for allocating State transportation funds; and

WHEREAS, SACOG has issued a ca ll for applications for the 202 4-25 transportation funding round; and

WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has identified tw o projects, the Riley Street Complete Streets Project, and the Highway 50 Class I Trail Undercrossing & Trail Improvements Project, that are both candidates for State transportation funds; and

WHEREAS, staff is requesting direction from City Council on a prioritization ranking of the two projects, which could consist of prioritizing only one of the projects, or a combination of both projects; and

WHEREAS, once the projects that are grant funded are identified, staff will return to Council for approval of the source of the required match funding , accept the grant award, and request an increase to revenue estimates and appropriations for the amount awarded.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes staff to submit grant applications to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the 2024-25 funding round.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 250 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.11.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolutions Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees
i. Resolution No. 11364 – A Resolution Replacing
Resolution No. 11219 and Resolution No. 11235 and
Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City
User Fees for Selected City Services

ii. Resolution No. 11365- A Resolution Replacing
Resolution No. 11186 and Enacting the Annual
Inflationary Adjustment for Selected Community
Development User Fees
FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council conduct the public hearing and approve the below resolutions enacting the annual inflationary adjustment for city user fees:
i. Resolution No. 11364– A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11219 and Resolution No. 11235 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Selected City Services

ii. Resolution No. 11365- A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11186 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for Selected Community Development User Fees

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

In May 2006, the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 7815 which established a new user fee schedule for selected city services and also adopted an annual inflationary adjustment.

City User Fees for Selected City Services had the inflationary adjustment last applied on July

Page 251 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.
2 1, 202 4, adopted with Resolution No. 11219. Planning User Fees had the inflationary adjustment last applied on September 21, 2024, adopted with Resolution No. 11235.

In May 2024, the Folsom City Council adopted Resolution No. 11186 which established an amended user fee schedule for Community Devel opment Engineering and Building Services User Fees. This fee schedule became effective August 1, 2024.

POLICY / RULE

City of Folsom Municipal Code Section 3.50.020 states, “The city manager is hereby directed to recommend to the council the adjustment of fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in this chapter and on the schedule of rate review as hereinafter established in this chapter. Costs reasonably borne shall be as are defined in Section 3.50.030.”

City Council Resolution No. 7815 adopted on May 23, 2006, approved an annual inflationary adjustment to be applied each fiscal year for selected city user fees along with fee increases based on a fee study.

City Council Resolution No. 11186 adopted on May 28, 2024, adopted a n amended user fee schedule for Community Development Engineering and Building Services based on a fee study. This study included a fee schedule with identified fees assessing and annual CPI increase.

ANALYSIS

The annual inflationary adjustment to be applied is 2.38%. This is based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI -West Urban Consumers, all items, San Francisco CMSA, Annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year as set forth in Resolution No. 7815. The proposed fee schedules were derived by applying the annual inflationary adjustment to the current fees if allowed.

The proposed April 22, 2025, City user fee schedule for selected City Services is included as part of Resolution No. 11364 and will be effective July 1, 2025.

The proposed April 22, 2025, fee schedule for selected Community Development User Fees is included as part of Resolution No. 11365 and will be effective July 1, 2025.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

This inflationary adjustment will enable the City to improve cost recovery and reduce the financial burden on the General Fund as long as User Fee activity continues.

ATTACHMENTS

Page 252 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.
3 1. Resolution No. 11364– A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11219 and Resolution No. 11235 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Selected City Services

2. Resolution No. 11365- A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11186 and Enacting the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for Selected Community Development User Fees

3. United States Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-West Urban consumers, all items, San Francisco CMSA as of December 2024

Submitted,

Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director

Page 253 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Attachment 1

Page 254 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 1 of 10 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11364

A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 11219 AND RESOLUTION NO. 11235 AND ENACTING THE ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY

USER FEES FOR SELECTED CITY SERVICES

WHEREAS, City of Folsom Municipal Code Section 3.50.020 states “The city manager is hereby directed to recommend to the council the adjustment of fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in this chapter and on the schedule of rate review as hereinafter established in this chapter. Costs reasonably borne shall be as are defined in Section 3.50.030.”; and

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 7815 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 23, 2006, allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to User Fees each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11219 adopted by City Council on June 25, 2024, set the most recent User Fee schedule for selected City Services; and

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11235 adopted by City Council on July 23, 2024, set the most recent User Fee schedule for Planning; and

WHEREAS, the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI -West Urban Cons umers, all items, San Francisco CMSA annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year; and

WHEREAS, as of December 31, 2024 the annual inflationary adjustment to be applied is

2.38%;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom Replaces Resolution No. 11219 and Resolution No. 11235 and Enacts the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for City User Fees for Selected City Services as of July 1, 2025 as set forth in the fee schedules attached hereto;

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

Page 255 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 2 of 10 ends

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 256 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 3 of 10 ends

City of Folsom
Master Fee Schedule as of July 1, 2025

DEPARTMENT/SERVICE
FEE
07/01/2024
ANNUAL

INFLATION

ADJUSTMENT

FEE
07/01/2025
Reso 11219 Annual CPI 1 Proposed

Finance
FN-1a Returned Check Fee - Initial $25 $ - $25 FN-1b Returned Check Fee - Additional $35 $ - $35 FN-2 Lien/Delinquency Admin Fee $125 $ - $125 FN-2a Admin/Disconnect Fee $75 $ - $75 FN-2b Reconnect Fee - during business hours $50 $ - $50 FN-2c Reconnect Fee - after business hours

$135 $ - $135
Business License Certificate
FN-4 New License Review Fee $28 $ 1 $29 PE-65 New Home Occupation Review Permit $31 N/A Reso 11356 FN-5 License Reprint Fee $14 $ 0.33 $14 FN-7 Customer Business Lists - Year $21 $ 0.50 $21 FN-8 Customer Business Lists - 1 month $21 $ 0.50 $21 Annual Historic District Surcharge Tax $60 - $60
Home Occupation Annual Certificate $40 - $40
Business License Certificate Fee Table Class. A-C Class. A-C Specialty Operations Class. D Class. D

Cardroom Business License Fees
FN-9 Application and investigation $708 $ 17 $725 FN-10 Annual License Renewal $94 $ 2 $96 FN-12 PER Table Fee per QUARTER $280 $ 7 $287 FN-13 Alternative Method of Payment 2.75% - 3% 2.75% - 3%

Water
W-3 Construction Meter Rental Rate per
Month
$100 $ - $100
W-4 Security Deposit for 2.5 inch
Construction Meter
$900 $ - $900
W-5 Security Deposit for 4 inch Construction
Meter
$2,700 $ - $2,700
W-6 Relocation of Construction Meter $25 $ - $25 W-7 Repeat Disinfection Testing of New
Facilities
$200 $ - $200

Page 257 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 4 of 10 ends

W-8 Backflow Testing Tag $15 $ - $15 W-9 Testing of Backflow Device $100 $ - $100

Wastewater

WW-1 Emergency Call Out (After
Hours/Hourly Rate)
$135 $ - $135
WW-2 Clean up of Sanitary Sewer Overflow
From Private Lateral or collection
system (Hourly rate)
$200 $ - $200
WW-3 Inspection of Private Collection Systems
to Include Manholes, Maines and
Laterals (Hourly Rate)
$150 $ - $150
Police
P-1 Vehicle Release $183 $ 4 $187 P-2 Livescan $27 $ 1 $28
P-3 Alarm Permit (New) $47 $ 1 $48 P-3b Alarm Permit (Renewal - Commercial) $18 $ 1 $19 P-4 False Alarm (2nd false alarm - infor. not
updated)
$101 $ 2 $103
P-4b False Alarm (3rd false alarm) $101 $ 2 $103 P-4c False Alarm (4th false alarm) $114 $ 3 $117 P-4d False Alarm (5th+ false alarm) $174 $ 4 $178 P-6 Repossessions $15 $ 1 $16
P-7 VIN Verification $46 $ 1 $47 P-8 Clearance Letter-Clear $41 $ 1 $42 P-9 Vehicle Sign-Off $46 $ 1 $47 P-10 Firearms Permit $492 $ 12 $504 P-15 Adult Businesses $149 $ 4 $153 P-17 HS 11590 Registration $27 $ 1 $28 P-18 Police report copy $5 - $5

Fire
FR-1 California Fire Code Inspection - HSC
13146.2 and 13146.3
$205 $ 5 $210
Pre-license Inspection < 25 - HSC 13235 $53 $ 1 $54 Pre-license Inspection > 25 - HSC 13235 $107 $ 3 $110 FR-2 Re-Inspection (2nd and subsequent
reinspections)
$253 $ 6 $259
FR-3 Fire Stand Pipe System Plan Review bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val FR-4 Fire Hydrant System PC bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val FR-5 Fire Sprinkler System Plan Review bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val FR-6 Fire Pump Plan Review bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val

Page 258 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 5 of 10 ends

FR-7 Fire Alarm System Plan Review bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val FR-10 Fixed Fire Protection System Plan
Review
bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val
FR-11 Gas System Plan Review (Medical, LPG,
Compressed, etc.)
bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val
FR-14 Public Fireworks Display PC bldg pmt val bldg pmt val bldg pmt val FR-15 Special Fire Inspection (after hours or by
request)
$273 $ 6 $279
FR-23 Safe & Sane Fireworks Stand Inspection $361 $ 9 $370 FR-24 Incident/Inspection Report Copy $20 $ - $20 FR-25 Patient Care Report (PCR) and/or
Medical Billing
$32 $ - $32
FR-26 Fire Hazard/Vegetation Management
Administrative fee per Re Inspection
$169 $ 4 $173
Weed Abatement Cost - City's cost $1000
Minimum
$1000
Minimum
FR-28 False Alarm (2nd false alarm - infor. not
updated)
$101 $ 2 $103
FR-28b False Alarm (3rd false alarm) $101 $ 2 $103 FR-28c False Alarm (4th false alarm) $120 $ 3 $123 FR-28d False Alarm (5th+ false alarm) $178 $ 4 $182 FR-36 Fire Hydrant Flow Test $223 $ 5 $228 FR-39 Fire Photograph(s) Flash Drive $33 $ 1 $34 FR-42 Expedited Services Fee 1.5 X Reg
Fee

1.5 X Reg
Fee
FR-43 Fire Safety Officer Standby, Third Party
review or Inspection
Actual Cost Actual Cost

Ambulance Services
Base Rate Within Corporate City Limits $2,158 $ - $2,158 Base Rate Outside Corporate City Limits $2,158 $ - $2,158 Patient Assessment/Treatment - No
Transport
$425 $ - $425
Milage (per mile) $39 $ - $39
ALS Supplies $105 $ - $105
Oxygen $165 $ - $165
Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator $168 $ - $168 Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
(CPAP)
$225 $ - $225
Bone Drill $305 $ - $305

Community Development
PE-75 Expedited Services Fee 1.5 X Regular
Fee
$
-

1.5 X Regular
Fee
PE-76 Technical Assistance / Third Party Actual Cost $ Actual Cost

Page 259 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 6 of 10 ends

review or Inspection -
PE-77 Protected Tree removed or impacted
within the buildable area of a residential
lot (DSH-diameter per inch)
125.00 (DSH) $
-
125.00
(DSH)
PE-78 Protected Tree removed or impacted
(DSH-diameter per inch)
250.00 (DSH) $
-
250.00
(DSH)

City Clerk
CC-2a Document Printing & Copying (First 10
pages free)
$0.10 $ 0.00 $0.10
CC-3 Document Printing Pages greater than
17x14 or color copies (per side/per page)
$5 $ 0 $5
CC-6 Copy DVD $5 $ 0 $5
CC-8 Folsom Municipal Code Cost to
Produce
Cost to Produce Cost to
Produce
CC-9 Updates to Folsom Municipal Code Cost to
Produce
Cost to Produce Cost to
Produce
CC-10 Planning Commission Decision Appeal -
Owner occupied, single family dwelling
$264 N/A Reso 11356
CC-11 Planning Commission Decision Appeal -
All others
$536 N/A Reso 11356
CC-13 Code Enforcement Administrative
Hearing
$198 $ 5 $203

Library
LB-8a Self service copy charges - (B & W) $0.15 $ - $0.15 LB-8b Self service copy charges - (Color) $.50/page $ - $.50/page LB-10 Interlibrary loan/item (plus add'l lending
library fees)
$5 $ - $5
LB-11 Lost or damaged books in Folsom
collection
Up to cost of
item plus
$5.00
processing fee
$ - Up to cost of
item plus $5.00
processing fee
LB-12 Lost or damaged materials from
interlibrary loan
Up to cost of
item, plus
charges form
lending
library, plus
$5.00 local
processing fee
$ - Up to cost of
item, plus
charges form
lending library,
plus $5.00 local
processing fee
LB-13 Referral fee for material and fee recovery
services (for accounts with billed
overdue materials and total outstanding
charges of $25 or more)
$10 $ - $10
1 Annual inflationary adjustment based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI -West Urban Consumers, all items San Francisco CMSA, Annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year.

Page 260 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 7 of 10 ends

# DEPARTMENT/SERVICE FEE
9/21/2024
ANNUAL

INFLATION

ADJUSTMENT
FEE
7/1/2025
Reso 11235 Annual CPI 1 Proposed
Planning
PE-1 Preliminary Project Review (deposit) $656 N/A Reso 11356 PE-2 Tentative Parcel Map Review (deposit) $5,710 N/A Reso 11356 PE-3 Tentative Subdivision Map Review (deposit)
$6,718+$34/Lot N/A Reso 11356
PE-4 Tentative Map Amendment Review (deposit) $9,515 N/A Reso 11356 PE-6 Tentative Map Extension Review (deposit) $4,087 N/A Reso 11356 PE-7
Site Design Review - Planning Comm.
(deposit) $4,794 N/A Reso 11356
PE-7b Site Design Review $302 N/A Reso 11356
PE-8 Planned Development review (deposit) $9175 +
$458/acre N/A Reso 11356
PE-9
Planned Development Mod. Review
(deposit) $9,162 N/A Reso 11356
PE-10 Planned Development Ext. Review (deposit) $3,217 N/A Reso 11356 PE-11 Specific Plan Review (deposit) $6,432 N/A Reso 11356 PE-12 Specific Plan Amend. Review (deposit) $7,076 N/A Reso 11356 PE-13
Initial Environmental Study/Assmnt
(deposit) $6,512 N/A Reso 11356
PE-15 Environmental Impact Review & Report $8,748 N/A Reso 11356 PE-16 Notice of CEQA determination $304 N/A Reso 11356 PE-18 Environmental Mitigation Prog. Monitoring $6,449 N/A Reso 11356 PE-20 Historic Dist SFD Design Rvw (deposit) $63 N/A Reso 11356 PE-21 H.D. Mult Fam/Comm Design Rvw (deposit) $2,210 N/A Reso 11356 PE-22 Arch Review - SFD (deposit) $63 N/A Reso 11356 PE-23 Arch Review - Mult Fam/Comm. (deposit) $2,210 N/A Reso 11356 PE-24 Historic Dist Sign Review (deposit) $63 N/A Reso 11356 PE-25 Sign Permit - Staff $129 N/A Reso 11356
PE-
25b Sign Permit Extension $60 N/A Reso 11356
PE-26 PD Permit Sign Only (deposit) $1,286 N/A Reso 11356 PE-27 Zoning Verification Review (deposit) $310 N/A Reso 11356 PE-28
Rezoning Request Review - 5 acres or less
(deposit) $3,005 N/A Reso 11356
PE-29
Rezoning Request Review- 5+ acres
(deposit) $6,000 N/A Reso 11356
PE-30
Lot Line Adj./Parcel Merger (planning)
(deposit) $1,015 N/A Reso 11356
PE-31 Annexation Processing (deposit) $5,789 N/A Reso 11356 PE-32 Variance Review- SFD (deposit) $1,686 N/A Reso 11356 PE-33 Variance Review- Other (deposit) $1,686 N/A Reso 11356 PE-35 Appeal - Admin $258 N/A Reso 11356
PE-36 Appeal - by other (deposit) $515 N/A Reso 11356 PE-37 Code Amendment (deposit) $2,297 N/A Reso 11356 PE-38 General Plan Amendment <5 acres (deposit) $4,384 N/A Reso 11356

Page 261 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 8 of 10 ends

PE-39 General Plan Amendment >5 acres (deposit) $8,768 N/A Reso 11356 PE-40 Temporary Use Permit Review $65 N/A Reso 11356 PE-41
Conditional Use Permit Review (Major)
(deposit) $5,950 N/A Reso 11356
PE-
41b
Conditional Use Permit Review (Minor)
(deposit) $2,821 N/A Reso 11356
PE-42
Conditional Use Permit Modification
(deposit) $1,647 N/A Reso 11356
PE-43 Street Name Review/Change (deposit) $1,256 N/A Reso 11356 PE-44 Devl. Agreemnt Processing (deposit) $5,405 N/A Reso 11356 PE-64 Condominium Conversion Fee $11,709 N/A Reso 11356 PE-65 Home Occupation Permit Fee $31 N/A Reso 11356
PE-66 Unattended Donation Box
$201 + $49
Renewal N/A Reso 11356
PE-67 Opinion on a Planning Matter $258 N/A Reso 11356 PE-68 Landmark Tree $295 N/A Reso 11356
PE-69 Off-Site Weekend Directional Signs $175 N/A Reso 11356 PE-70 Uniform Sign Program $295 N/A Reso 11356
PE-71 Temporary Sign Permit $10 N/A Reso 11356
PE-72 Non-residential Plan Check Fee (Planning) 10% of building permit
fee N/A Reso 11356
PE-74 Entertainment Permit $46 N/A Reso 11356

Page 262 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 9 of 10 ends

Page 263 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11364

Page 10 of 10 ends

Page 264 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Attachment 2

Page 265 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11365

Page 1 of 5 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11365

A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 11186 AND ENACTING THE

ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT FOR SELECTED COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT USER FEES

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11186 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 28, 2024, set the most recent User Fee schedule for selected Community Development User Fees and allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to specified fees each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the US Bureau of Labor Statistics & CA Department of Finance CPI -West Urban Consumers, all items, San Francisco CMSA annual amount as of December of the previous calendar year; and

WHEREAS, as of December 31, 2024 the annual inflationary adjustment to be applied is

2.38%;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom Replaces Resolution No. 11186 and Enacts the Annual Inflationary Adjustment for Selected Community Development User Fees as of July 1, 2025 as set forth in the fee schedule attached hereto;

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22
nd day of April, 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 266 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11365

Page 2 of 5 ends

CITY OF FOLSOM
BUILDING FEES – PLAN REVIEW, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025

[a] Total fees shall not exceed amounts outlined in California Government Code 66015(a)(1). [b] The City will not collect additional permit processing fees. Amounts shown are total amount due for permit processing, plan review, and permit.

Activity Description Fee
CPI
Increase
Proposed
Fee
7/01/2025
Charge
Basis Note CPI
1 HVAC Change-Out - Residential $230 $5 $235 per permit Y 2 Water Heater Change-Out - Residential $184 $4 $188 per permit Y 3 Residential Re-Roof $368 $9 $377 per permit Y
4 Siding Replacement $322 $8 $330 per permit Y
5 Service Panel Upgrade - Residential $276 $7 $283 per permit Y 6 Battery Backup Storage $368 $9 $377 per permit Y
7 Electric Vehicle Charger $368 $9 $377 per permit Y
8 Generator $368 $9 $377 per permit Y
9 Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar
Permit
a) Plan Review
i) Base Fee for 15kW or Less $200 $0.00 $200 per permit [a],[b] N ii) Fee for Each Additional kW above 15kW $15 $0.00 $15 per permit [a],[b] N b) Permit $250 $0.00 $250 per permit [a],[b] N
10 Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar
Permit
a) Plan Review
i) Base Fee 50kW or Less $444 $0.00 $444 per permit [a],[b] N ii) Fee for Each Add'l kW above 50kW up to 250kW $7 $0.00 $7 per permit [a],[b] N ii) Fee for Each Add'l kW above 250kW $5 $0.00 $5 per permit [a],[b] N b) Permit $556 $0.00 $555 per permit [a],[b] N
11 Pool Solar $184 $4.38 $188 per permit Y
12 Swimming Pool Replaster / Equipment Change-Out $460 $10.95 $470 per permit Y 13 Swimming Pool Remodel (e.g., Changing Pool
Shape, Adding Cabo Shelf, etc.) $920 $21.90 $941 per permit Y 14 Retaining Wall
a) One Type of Retaining Wall Type/Configuration $552 $13.14 $565 per permit Y b) Each Additional Wall Type/Configuration $276 $6.57 $282 per permit Y 15 Window / Sliding Glass Door - Retrofit / Repair
a) Up to 5 $184 $4.38 $188 per permit Y
b) Per Window Over 5 Windows $37 $0.88 $37 per permit Y 16 Fences Requiring a Building Permit $368 $8.76 $376 per permit Y 17 Electrical and Irrigation Pedestals per pedestal $276 $6.57 $282 per permit Y 18 Detached and Attached ADUs $4,600 $109.48 $4,709 per permit Y 19 Junior ADUs $2,208 $52.55 $2,260 per permit Y

Page 267 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11365

Page 3 of 5 ends

CITY OF FOLSOM
BUILDING FEES – PLAN REVIEW, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025

Activity Description Fee
CPI
Increase
Proposed Fee
7/01/2025 Note CPI
1 Building Plan Check Fees - Building
a) Plan Review Fee, if applicable 80% $0 80% [a] N

b) Expedited Plan Check - At
Application Submittal (when
applicable)

1.5x standard
plan check fee
$0 1.5x standard plan
check fee N

c) Tract Home / Master Plan
Construction (Production Units)
20% of
standard plan
check fee
$0 20% of standard
plan check fee [b] N

d) Production Permit for Multi-family
permit $1,472 $35 $1,507 Y
e) Production Permit for Fire permits
and other misc. permits
$460 $11 $471

Y
f) Alternate Materials and Methods
Review (per hour)
$184 $4 $188

Y
g) Excess Plan Review Fee (4th and
subsequent) (per hour)
$184 $4 $188

Y
h) Revisions to an Approved Permit
(per hour)
$184 $4 $188

Y
i) Deferred Submittal (per hour) $184 $4 $188

Y
When applicable, plan check fees shall be paid at the time of application for a building permit.

The plan checking fee is in addition to the building permit fee

[a] Includes up to three plan checks. The City will bill hourly for additional plan review required. [b] For identical buildings built by the same builder on the same lot or in the same tract and for which building permits are issued at the same time.

Page 268 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11365

Page 4 of 5 ends

CITY OF FOLSOM
BUILDING FEES – OTHER, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025

Activity Description Fee
CPI
Increase
Proposed
Fee
7/01/2025 Note CPI
1 Permit Processing Fee $77 $2 $79

Y
2 Strong Motion Instrumentation (SMI) Fee
Calculation

[a]

a) Residential $0.50 or
valuation x
.00013
- $0.50 or
valuation x
.00013
[a] N

b) Commercial $0.50 or
valuation x
.00028
- $0.50 or
valuation x
.00028
[a] N
3 Building Standards (SB 1473) Fee
Calculation (Valuation)

[a]

a) $1 - $25,000 $1 - $1 [a] N
b) $25,001 - $50,000 $2 - $2 [a] N
c) $50,001 - $75,000 $3 - $3 [a] N
d) $75,001 - $100,000 $4 - $4 [a] N
e) Each Add'l $25,000 or fraction thereof Add $1 - Add $1 [a] N 4 Business License Fee $25 - $25

N
5 CASP Training Fund Fee $3.60 - $3.60

N
6 State Disability Access Fee $0.40 - $0.40

N
7 General Plan/Zoning Code Update Fee
(percent of building permit fee)
5% - 5% [b] N
8 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
(Phasing Plan) Fee
$920 $22 $942

Y
9 Permit Extension $0 $0 $0

Y
10 Permit Reactivation Fee

a) Reactivation Fee if All Inspections
Have Been Performed and Approved Up to
But Not Including Final Inspection
$184 $0 $
184

b) Reactivation Fee - All Other Scenarios

i) Permit Expired Up to One Year 50% of Original
Base Building
Permit Fee
- 50% of
Original Base
Building
Permit Fee

ii) Permit Expired More than One Year 100% of Original
Base Building
Permit Fee
- 100% of
Original Base
Building
Permit Fee

N
11 Permit Reissuance Fee $184 $4 $188

Page 269 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Resolution No. 11365

Page 5 of 5 ends

12 Damaged Building Survey (Fire, Flood,
Vehicle Damage, Etc.) (per hour)
$184 $4 $188

Other Fees

13 Phased Inspection Fee (per inspection) $184 $4 $188

Y
14 After Hours Inspection (per hour) (4-hour
minimum)
$221 $5 $226

Y
15 Re-inspection Fee (2nd Time or More)
(each)
$184 $4 $188 [c] Y
16 Missed Inspection Fee $184 $4 $188

Y
17 Duplicate Copy of Permit $77 $2 $79

Y
18 Duplicate Copy of Certificate of
Occupancy
$77 $2 $79

Y
19 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee
Schedule (per 1/2 hour)
$92 $2 $94

Violation Fees

20 Investigation Fee For Work Done Without
Permits
(In addition to applicable permit fees)
equal to
permit fee
- equal to
permit fee

[a] Amounts established by State of California. In the case of discrepancy between this schedule and amounts established by the State, State amounts shall supersede these amounts. [b] Fee applies to new construction, additions, tenant improvements, and residential remodels requiring building permits. [c] Reinspection fee applies after the first re-inspection.

Page 270 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Attachment 3

Page 271 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 272 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.12.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11366 – A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11233 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement,
Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees

FROM: Finance Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Staff requests the City Council conduct the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 11366 – A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11233 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug -Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE

In May 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7812 which established new city impact and connection fees for law enforcement, fire suppression, general facilities, vehicles and equipment, park improvement, Humbug -Willow Creek, housing trust, water, sanitary sewer, transportation improvement, drainage, and light rail. Resolution No. 7812 also approved an annual inflationary adjustment.

POLICY / RULE

Folsom Municipal Code

Page 273 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.
2 The Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows:

 Section 03.20.045 – Solid Waste Fee
 Section 03.80.040 – Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement  Section 03.90.010 – Housing Trust Fee
 Section 04.10.010 – Park Improvement
 Section 04.12.010 – Humbug-Willow Creek Fee
 Section 10.50.040 – Light Rail
 Section 12.04.060 – Transportation Improvement
 Section 13.24.050 – Water Connection
 Section 13.25.010 – Sewer Connection
 Section 13.30.010 – Water Impact Fee
 Section 17.95.010 – Drainage Improvement

ANALYSIS

In accordance with Resolution No. 7812, adopted May 23, 2006, Staff has calculated proposed fee schedules to be effective July 1, 2025. The annual inflationary adjustment to be applied is

1.60%. This percentage adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 2024. The proposed fee schedules were derived by applying the annual inflationary adjustment to the current fee.

Government Code section 66018 require s a public hearing for certain fee increases.

Government Code section 66017 states fees may be effective no sooner than 60 days following the adoption of the increase in the fee or charge.

The proposed July 1, 2025, fee schedules are included in Resolution No. 11366 as Attachment 1 and the Construction Cost Index obtained from the Engineering News Record is included as Attachment 2.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11366 – A Resolution Replacing Resolution No. 11233 and Approving the Updated City Impact and Connection Fee Schedule for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug-Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees.

2. Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index

3. Resolution No. 7812 - A Resolution Rescinding Resolution Nos. 6222 And 6684 And Establishing New City Impact and Connection Fees for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail

Page 274 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.
3 Submitted,

Stacey Tamagni, Finance Director

Page 275 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Attachment 1

Page 276 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 1 of 7 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 11366

A RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 11233 AND APPROVING THE

UPDATED CITY IMPACT AND CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE FOR LAW

ENFORCEMENT, FIRE SUPPRESSION, GENERAL FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND

EQUIPMENT, PARK IMPROVEMENT, HUMBUG-WILLOW CREEK, HOUSING

TRUST, WATER, SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, TRANSPORTATION

IMPROVEMENT, DRAINAGE, AND LIGHT RAIL IMPACT FEES

WHEREAS, the Folsom Municipal Code sets impact fees in various code sections as follows:
1). Section 03.20.045 – Solid Waste Fee
2). Section 03.80.040 – Police, Fire, and General Government Improvement 3). Section 03.90.010 – Housing Trust Fee
4). Section 04.10.010 – Park Improvement
5). Section 04.12.010 – Humbug-Willow Creek
6). Section 10.50.040 – Light Rail
7). Section 12.04.060 – Transportation Improvement
8). Section 13.24.050 – Water Connection
9). Section 13.25.010 – Sewer Connection
10). Section 13.30.010 – Water Impact Fee
11). Section 17.95.010 – Drainage Improvement; and

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 7812 adopted by the Folsom City Council on May 23, 2006, allowed for an annual inflationary adjustment to selected City Impact and Connection fees each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the City Council on April 22, 2025 , held a public hearing on the proposed fee updates and considered public comment; and

WHEREAS, the annual inflationary adjustment is based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for January through December 20 24 and the annual adjustment to be applied is 1.60%; and

WHEREAS, notice has been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and City Code;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom replaces Resolution No 11233 and approves the updated City Impact and Connection Fees as of July 1, 2025 for Law Enforcement, Fire Suppression, General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment, Park Improvement, Humbug -Willow Creek, Housing Trust, Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Transportation Improvement, Drainage, and Light Rail Impact Fees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of April 2025, by the following roll-call vote:

Page 277 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 2 of 7 ends

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

___________________________________
Sarah Aquino, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK

Page 278 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 3 of 7 ends

City of Folsom
Impact and Connection Fee Schedule As of July 1, 2025

FEE DESCRIPTION BASIS FEE
9/21/2024
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
FEE
7/1/2025
Reso 11233
2024 Annual
CCI1 Proposed
Police (FMC 3.80.010)
Single Family Residential Unit $700 $11 $711
Multi-Family Residential Unit $794 $13 $807
Mobile Dwellings Unit $182 $3 $184
Commercial Lodging Unit $40 $1 $41
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $1.179 $0.02 $1.198
Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $1.019 $0.02 $1.035

Fire (FMC 3.80.010)
Single Family Residential Unit $1,265 $20 $1,285
Multi-Family Residential Unit $1,223 $20 $1,243
Mobile Dwellings Unit $1,261 $20 $1,281
Commercial Lodging Unit $1,095 $18 $1,112
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $0.74 $0.01 $0.75
Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.32 $0.01 $0.33

General Facilities (FMC 3.80.010)
Single Family Residential Unit $1,860 $30 $1,890
Multi-Family Residential Unit $1,860 $30 $1,890
Mobile Dwellings Unit $1,851 $30 $1,881
Commercial Lodging Unit $265 $4 $269
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $0.58 $0.01 $0.59
Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.58 $0.01 $0.59

General Park Equip (FMC 3.80.010)
Single Family Residential Unit $109 $2 $111
Multi-Family Residential Unit $109 $2 $111
Mobile Dwellings Unit $51 $1 $52
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $0.021 $0.000 $0.022

Page 279 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 4 of 7 ends

Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.021 $0.000 $0.022

Drainage (FMC 17.95.030)
Single Family Residential Unit $1,208 $19 $1,227
Multi-Family Residential Unit $1,208 $19 $1,227
Mobile Dwellings Unit $1,208 $19 $1,227
Commercial Development/Office Acre $7,342 $117 $7,459
Industrial Development Acre $7,342 $117 $7,459

Light Rail Impact Fee (FMC 10.50.040)
Single Family Residential Unit $844 $13 $857
Multi-Family Residential Unit $580 $9 $589
Mobile Dwellings Unit $580 $9 $589
Commercial Development/Office Sq. Ft. $0.267 $0.004 $0.272 Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.111 $0.002 $0.113

Transportation Improv Fee (FMC

12.04.060)

Single Family Residential Unit $9,515.90 $152.25 $9,668.16 Multi-Family Residential Unit $6,660.88 $106.57 $6,767.45 Mobile Dwellings Unit $6,660.88 $106.57 $6,767.45
Commercial Sq Ft. $14.29 $0.23 $14.52
Industrial/Office Sq Ft. $6.21 $0.10 $6.30
Other Sq Ft. $6.21 $0.10 $6.30
Additional Land Uses
High Trip Commercial Sq Ft. $56.70 $0.91 $57.61
Gas Stations¹ Sq Ft. $12,715 $203 $12,919
¹ per fueling station

Water Impact Fees (FMC 13.30.010)
Single Family Residential Unit $1,148 $18 $1,166
Multi-Family Residential Unit $618 $10 $628
Commercial Acre $1,545 $25 $1,570
Industrial/Office Acre $1,545 $25 $1,570

Water Connection Fees (FMC 13.24.010)
Residential
Single Family Residential Unit $3,916 $63 $3,978
Multi-Family Residential Unit $2,545 $41 $2,586

Page 280 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 5 of 7 ends

Lexington Hills Unit $2,425 $39 $2,464
Mobile Home Unit $2,545 $41 $2,586
Commercial
3/4” meter $3,906 $62 $3,968
1” meter $9,740 $156 $9,896
1 1/2” meter $19,486 $312 $19,798
2” meter $31,183 $499 $31,682
3” meter $62,383 $998 $63,381
4” meter $97,506 $1,560 $99,066
6” meter $195,083 $3,121 $198,204
8” meter $312,236 $4,996 $317,232
10” meter $449,240 $7,188 $456,428

Sewer Connection Fees (FMC 13.25.010)
Residential
Single Family Residential Unit $1,250 $20 $1,270
Multi-Family Residential Unit $977 $16 $993
Lexington Hills Unit $973 $16 $989
Mobile Home Unit $1,105 $18 $1,123
Commercial
3/4” meter $1,250 $20 $1,270
1” meter $1,250 $20 $1,270
1 1/2” meter $2,503 $40 $2,543
2” meter $4,005 $64 $4,069
3” meter $7,510 $120 $7,630
4” meter $12,517 $200 $12,717
6” meter $25,033 $401 $25,434
8” meter $40,052 $641 $40,693
10” meter $57,574 $921 $58,495

Solid Waste Capital Improvement Fee
(FMC 3.20.045)

Residential
Single Family Residential Unit $422 $7 $429
Mobile Homes Unit $194 $3 $197
Commercial/ Multi Family
2 yard dumpster $4,735 $76 $4,811
3 yard dumpster $4,767 $76 $4,843
4 yard dumpster $4,834 $77 $4,911

Page 281 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 6 of 7 ends

6 yard dumpster $5,032 $81 $5,112
15 yard roll-off $15,500 $248 $15,748
20 yard roll $15,916 $255 $16,170
30 yard roll $16,556 $265 $16,821
40 yard roll $16,914 $271 $17,185

Park Construction Capital Impact (FMC

4.10)

Single Family Residential Unit $8,199 $131 $8,330
Multi-Family Residential Unit $5,446 $87 $5,534
Senior Residential Housing Unit $4,210 $67 $4,277
Mobile Dwellings Unit $3,146 $50 $3,197
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $0.555 $0.009 $0.564
Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.555 $0.009 $0.564

Humbug-Willow Creek (FMC 4.12)
Single Family Residential Unit $322 $5 $327
Multi-Family Residential Unit $203 $3 $206
Mobile Dwellings Unit $176 $3 $179
Commercial Development Sq. Ft. $0.078 $0.001 $0.079
Industrial Development Sq. Ft. $0.078 $0.001 $0.079

1 Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index - 2024 Annual Average

Page 282 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Resolution No. 11366

Page 7 of 7 ends

FEE DESCRIPTION BASIS FEE
9/21/2024
Annual
Inflation
Adjustment
FEE
7/1/2025
Reso 11233
2024 Annual
CCI1 Proposed
Housing Trust (FMC 3.90.010)

Office Sq. Ft. $2.05 $ 0.033 $2.08
Retail Sq. Ft. $2.05 $ 0.033 $2.08
Light Industrial Sq. Ft. $2.05 $ 0.033 $2.08
Heavy Industrial/Manufacturing Sq. Ft. $2.05 $ 0.033 $2.08 Light Industrial/Manufacturing Sq. Ft. $2.05 $ 0.033 $2.08

1 Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index - 2024 Annual Average

Page 283 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Attachment 2

Page 284 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 285 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 286 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 287 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 288 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 289 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 290 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 291 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Page 292 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.13.

Folsom City Council
Staff Report

1 MEETING DATE:

4/22/2025
AGENDA SECTION:

Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11356 – A Resolution to Amend Resolution No. 11186 and 11235 and Adopt an Amended User Fee Schedule for Community Development Planning and Engineering Services

FROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommend that the City Council conduct the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 11356 to amend Resolution No. 11186 and 11235 and adopt an amended user fee schedule for Community Development Planning and Engineering services.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
User and processing fees for the Community Development Department’s services , including Building, Engineering and Planning, have not been comprehensively evaluated since at least 2006.

Using a grant received from the State, the Department hired ClearSource Financial Consulting to analyze existing user fees, hourly rates, and staff time needed to perform fee -based tasks for Building, Engineering, and Planning services as well as for Special Event Permits. The study found that existing fees did not adequately cover the amount of staff time and resources associated with those processes and services. The study proposed a new fee schedule, with some modifications to the structure itself, to better capture the costs associated with fee -based services. New fees for Building and Engineering services were adopted by City Council Resolution on May 28, 2024 and went into effect on August 1, 2024. At that time, City Council recommended staff delay updating Planning and Special Event Permit fees until a later date for the reasons described below.

Councilmembers noted that proposed Special Event Permit fees were potentially too high and that more research was needed to determine what types of events and organizations, such as non - profits, should be charged for events with community or economic d evelopment benefit.

Additionally, the special event process facilitated by Community Development Department may be better managed through other departments with clear thresholds and requirements . Staff have not yet had the capacity to do research on how to more fairly charge for special events or potentially improve the process, and so the current Special Event Permit fee is not proposed to be changed at

Page 293 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
2 this time. Staff expect to bring forward recommendations on the Special Event Permit process and fees in the second half of this year depending on Council priorities.

For the proposed changes to the processing fees for Planning services, which include appeal fees, some Councilmembers stated that better explanations were needed for the various Planning processes and how often they are utilized to determine if all listed fees are still necessary. Some Council members also stated that the proposed appeal fees were too high even though they captured staff’s level of effort involved in recent appeals . Based on these concerns, s taff determined that it would be most effective to discuss Planning fees in tandem with the upcoming Zoning Code update . This update may come with modifications to, or even the elimination of , existing Planning processes that could in t urn have effects on staff time and Planning fees. Staff believe that discussing proposed changes to processes in the Zoning Code update should go hand in hand with discussions of the fees associated with those processes to improve efficiency.

However, the Zoning Code update has not progressed on its original schedule due to other pressing projects taking precedence. As such, in order to avoid further delays, and so that Planning can start collecting fees that better reflect the time required to process applications, staff are now proposing to update the Planning fees using current fee types, with the intent of coming back to the City Council to recommend adjusting fee types at a later date once processes are modified under t he Zoning Code update.

Finally, after implementation of the Building and Engineering services updated fee schedule from May 28, 2024 , Engineering and City Arborist staff found that a small number of their newly modified fees were not working as intended i n terms of reflecting either the amount of staff time or the proposed cost recovery . As such, staff have also proposed a few minor updates to the Engineering fee schedule to adjust those fees accordingly.

POLICY / RULE
The objectives of the fee study, the methodology used to complete the study, and the formulation of outcomes and recommended fee updates were significantly influenced by Article XIII C of the California Constitution, Propositions 218 (1996) and 26 (2010), and Section 66014 of the California Government Code.

Article XIII C states that, “the local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. ” Additionally, Article XIII C identifies the following development processing fees as items that are not defined as taxes:

● A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reaso nable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege [Art. XIII, C, 1(e)(1)].

Page 294 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
3 ● A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product [Art. XIII, C, 1(e)(2)].

● A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investi gations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof [Art. XIII, C, 1(e)(3)].

Section 66014(a) of the California Government Code includes the following, “ Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use permits; building inspections; building permits; ...the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act...; or planning services...; thos e fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submit ted to, and approved by, a popular vote of two -thirds of those electors voting on the issue”.

The outcomes and recommendations of the fee study were intended to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws including providing confirmation that the proposed fees (“charges”) recommended as a result of the fee study are not taxes as defined in Article XIII C of the California Constitution and th at the proposed fees are no more than necessary to the cover the reasonable costs of the City’s activities and services addressed in the fees. Additionally, the Planning fee study and modified Engineering Fee Schedule (refer to Attachments 2 and 4 respectively) show that the manner in which the costs are allocated to a pay or bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and services provided by the City.

ANALYSIS

PLANNING CHANGES
The Planning Division made several proposed modifications to the fee schedule to reflect costs associated with the permit and project reviews including:

 Flat Fees : Implementing flat fees for most Planning services rather than the existing deposit-based fees to better reflect the necessary level of staff effort to support review of the proposed projects and permits.
 Higher Fees for Complex Entitlements : Substantially increasing fees for larger Commission-level Planning entitlements (including Annexations, D evelopment Agreement processing, Code Amendments, General Plan Amendments, Rezones, Specific Plans, Condominium Conversions, Multi-Family/Commercial Variances, and Landmark Tree Declassifications) to cover full costs.

Page 295 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
4  Lower Fees : L owering fees that did not fall in line with estimated staff time spent (including Planned Development Modifications and Tentative Map Amendments), while still recovering full costs.
 Design Review Fee Changes : Increasing the cost for Design Review of new pr imary structures to recover full costs and increasing the cost of Design Review of existing primary structures and new accessory structures to recover partial costs.  Appeal Fees: Increasing the fees for appeals to cover a more significant portion of staff time that goes into preparing appeals for Planning Commission and City Council and ensuring that the appeal fees are similar to those fees of comparable jurisdictions in the region.
 New Fee: Adding a new fee for staff-level Minor Administrative Modifications.

Flat Fees vs. Deposit-Based Fees
Staff considered using mostly deposit-based fees that would reflect the actual staff time spent on each project or permit for Planning and Engineering fees. There are several jurisdictions in the area that utilize deposit-based fees, including Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove and Roseville. The City of Folsom’s existing fee schedule currently lists the majority of fees for Planning services as deposit-based fees. However, CDD is not currently set up with the staffing, accounti ng bookkeeping, and monitoring resources to track both departmental hours and hours from other departments and process the refunds and invoices for the volume of project entitlements and permits that are seen annually. As such, it has not been feasible for staff to collect funds beyond the amount collected for the initial deposit. In accordance with these limitations, the majority of fees proposed are flat fees. These flat fees were developed based on the estimated time it takes to process an “average” project or permit of that type. Furthermore, the additional fee sub-types and fee schedule restructuring described above help provide a more realistic set of fees that better capture staff time spent processing and reviewing permits and projects.

While deposit-based fees were not deemed feasible for most permits and projects, staff did identify certain more complex projects to be administered using a “time and materials” billing approach.

For these fees, staff would collect an initial deposit and bill against that deposit for the costs of outside consultant review and support, and in-house labor efforts, and either request replenishment of funds or refund the unused deposit amount as appropr iate. Examples of deposit -based fees include annexation s, development agreement s, and specific plan processing, as well as environmental (CEQA) review. Staff has also included “time and materials” fees for costs associated with outside agency review/servic es, and outside expertise related to appeals that require additional resources beyond those covered in the scope of the fee schedule. These are considered pass-through fees with administrative oversight. If it’s the Council’s desire to pursue implementing a deposit-based fee structure, additional staffing would be needed to support that effort.

Page 296 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
5 Appeal Fees
For staff-level and Commission -level decisions, staff performed a regional analysis to see how other similarly sized jurisdictions were charging for Planning appeals. Staff found that the City of Elk Grove has a $2,500 flat fee for third -party appeals and a $3,000 deposit fee for applicant appeals with time -and-materials costs billed to the applicant. The Cites of Rocklin and Rancho Cordova and both utilize flat appeal fees in the $4, 300 to $5,300 range, and do not differentiate between applicants and third parties. The City of Roseville utilizes relatively low appeal fees, but those fees are meant to cover administrative costs only, and the project applicant is responsible for paying any subsequent time and material costs incurred by staff. Actual appeal fees for Roseville typically range from $2,080 to $5,530.

In addition to the fee adjustment for Planning appeals, staff also recommend consolidating the fee categories for the type of appellants. Currently, there are two categories of appellants: Owner - occupied and Developer/Other. These categories have occasionally led to confusion. As a result, staff recommend eliminating the two different categor ies for appellants and instead using one appeal fee based on the type of appeal (i.e., staff -level decision appeal or Commission -level appeal) as Roseville, Rocklin and Rancho Cordova have done.

TABLE 1- REGIONAL FEE COMPARISON
Jurisdiction Appeal of Staff-Level
Decision
Appeal of Commission-Level
Decision
City of Folsom (current) $258 (admin)/$515 (other)
(flat)
$257 (admin)/$522 (other)
(flat)
City of Folsom (proposed) $2,500 (flat) $4,200 (flat)
City of Elk Grove $2,500 (flat) for third parties/
$3,000 (deposit) for applicants
$2,500 (flat) for third parties/
$5,000 (deposit) for applicants
City of Roseville $1,747 (deposit- applicant pays
for additional T&M costs)
$1,636 (deposit- applicant pays
for additional T&M costs)
City of Rocklin $5,392 (flat) $4,682 (flat)
City of Rancho Cordova $4,383 (flat) $4,373 (flat)

Minor Administrative Modification Fee
Along with the changes to the Appeal fees, Planning staff added a new fe e for Minor Administrative Modifications (M AMs). As described in Section 13 of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, MAMs are minor adjustments to the land use locations and parcel boundaries that are subject to a staff -level analysis . However, no specific fee had been established for these projects. Historically, staff c harged applicants the site design review fee, but this new fee will make it clear to applicants and the public what the review cost is.

Balancing Full Cost Recovery with Other City Objectives Consistent with Section 3.50.040 of the Folsom Municipal Code (FMC), most of the Planning fee levels are now set at or near full cost recovery. However, there are a few exceptions as described below with the percentage of cost recovery listed in parentheses:

Page 297 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
6 1. Appeal of a Staff Decision (58% cost recovery) and Appeal of a Commission Decision (69% cost recovery): Based on the feedback from Council and the public, staff reduced the amount of the fee. As shown in Table 1, the proposed City appeal fees are well within the range of appeal fees for other jurisdictions.

2. Design Review (62% to 85% cost recovery): Design review is important because the built environment as well as the natural environment make Folsom what it is. However, the challenge with design reviews, particularly those that require Commission review and approval, is that they do involve ample staff time, but keeping the fee at full cost recovery would result in fee levels that could discourage homeowners and small businesses from obtaining design review approval. It would also result in fees that are substantially higher than those of surrounding jurisdictions. As discussed below, this points to a need to change the City’s design review process to bring staff time in line with design review fees. This is one of the objectives of the Zoning Code update that is underway.

3. Historic District Design Review Fees : Most projects in the Historic District require Commission-level design review which means that staff have to do research, prepare a staff report and presentation for each design review or demolition project. As a result, the amount of staff time is significant. Charging full cost recovery would deter most homeowners and small businesses from seeking design review. Instead, applicants may either avoid making improvements or may simply try to submit for bu ilding permits without getting design review approval first or avoid going through the City for approval altogether. When that happens, it actually takes staff and the applicant more time and effort.

Instead, staff have set the Planning fees to be the same citywide regardless of whether the project is in the Historic District or not.
a. Existing Historic District Single- and Two-Family Dwelling/Accessory Structure/Demolition (15% cost recovery)
b. New Historic District Single Family, Two-Family Dwelling and Non-Exempted ADU (23% cost recovery)
c. Existing Historic District Multi-Family/Commercial Structure (64% cost recovery)

4. Entertainment Permit (46% cost recovery ): Entertainment permits are required for businesses in the Sutter Street subarea of the Historic District that have live amplified music, dancing, karaoke, etc. The Entertainment Permit was put in place to set uninform rules and better manage nightclub -related activities, which have been problematic in the past. Typically, processing entertainment permit applications takes about 2 hours of staff time, which includes Planning staff and City Manager review, resulting in a full cost recovery fee of $432. Sin ce the City wants to encourage businesses to obtain an entertainment permit whenever they have nightclub-related activities, the fee was reduced to $200. If the fee is set too high, businesses will likely avoid getting the permit , which then becomes a Code Enforcement matter, leading to additional staff costs.

Page 298 ends

04/22/2025 Item No.14.
7 5. Landmark Tree Classification (25% cost recovery): Given the City’s motto of “distinctive by nature”, its focus on tree preservation, and its General Plan policy goals, the Landmark Tree Classification fee was set at about 25% of actual staff time to encourage property owners to nominate more trees for landmark status and protection.

6. Opinion on a Planning Matter (46% cost recovery): The purpose of both the Opinion on a Planning Matter fee and the Preliminary Project Review fee is to provide applicants with early input to ensure that they prepare a complete application. This benefits not only the applicant but CDD staff, since staff are more likely to receive a complete and comprehensive application. As a result, staff are proposing to actually lower this fee from $258 to $200 as we want to encourage applicants to reach out to us early to reduce staff time later in the process after they’ve applied for their entitlements.

7. Preliminary Projec t Review (39% cost recovery ): As noted above, Preliminary Project Reviews are very helpful to staff and applicants on complex entitlement projects. These reviews are something that the Community Development Department wants to encourage because it reduces the amount of work involved after application submittal. Nonetheless, staff is proposing to increase the fee from $656 to $1,000; however, raising the fee further to cover 100% of staff costs would result in few projects using this beneficial early review process.

8. Sidewalk Vendor Permit (12% cost recovery ): This permit was created as a result of Council direction due to community concerns over unlicensed street vendors that were selling food and merchandise on City sidewalks. To encourage vendors to apply, the fee was initially set to $0. Staff are now proposing to raise the permit to $50. While this covers only a fraction of staff time, a fee that is any higher would discourage vendors from applying. As it is, few vendors have applied for this since this permit was created in 2021.

Most vendors are handled by Code Enforcement instead.

9. Variance Review – Single Family Dwelling (48% cost recovery): The fee for a variance for single-family home has been increased from $1,686 to $2,500. However, this still does not cover the entire cost of staff time given that this involves research, preparation of a staff report and a presentation to either the Historic District Commission or the Planning Commission. While staff proposes full cost recovery for variances on non-single-family properties, we are proposing a decreased cost for single -family properties to avoid over - burdening individual homeowners that are attempting to improve a property that may have unique physical characteristics that could warrant a variance.

Overall, staff has tried to strike a balance between full cost recovery and encouraging homeowners and developers to follow City regulations. Increasing fees beyond those of other similar jurisdictions to cover staff times risks deterring individuals from doing business in Folsom, but more importantly it raises important questions about the City’s development processe s. For example, one of the biggest factors affecting the amount of staff time involved in development

Page 299 ends

Folsom City CouncilApril 22, 2025

Folsom City Council
April 22, 2025