Firms Total Score
Public Sector Personnel Consultants
Los Angeles, CA
$250,000
86%
The Segal Group
Glendale, CA
$270,000
61%
Evergreen Solutions
Tallahassee, FL
$94,000
59%
Classification and Compensation Study
SP-04-HR-23
FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)
WEIGHT SCORE
1. QUALIFICATIONS OF
COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm 20% 2.0 10%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 5% 2.0 3%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 25% 2.5 16%
2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 25% 3.0 19%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
10% 2.0 5%
3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 15% 2.0 8%
TOTAL 100% 2.3 59%
SCORING MATRIX
Classification and Compensation Study
SP-04-HR-23
Evergreen Solutions
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.
SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent
FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)
WEIGHT SCORE
1. QUALIFICATIONS OF
COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm 20% 4.0 20%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 5% 4.0 5%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 25% 3.5 22%
2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 25% 3.5 22%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
10% 3.0 8%
3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 15% 2.5 9%
TOTAL 100% 3.4 86%
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.
SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent Public Sector Personnel Consultants
SCORING MATRIX
Classification and Compensation Study
SP-04-HR-23
FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)
WEIGHT SCORE
1. QUALIFICATIONS OF
COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm 20% 2.0 10%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 5% 2.0 3%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 25% 2.5 16%
2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 25% 3.0 19%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
10% 2.0 5%
3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 15% 2.5 9%
TOTAL 100% 2.3 61%
The Segal Group
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.
SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent
SCORING MATRIX
Classification and Compensation Study
SP-04-HR-23