Cities Index.
Scoring Matrix.pdf

Fontana City Council
February 14, 2023

Document
Scoring Matrix.pdf
Meeting
February 14, 2023
Body
Fontana City Council
Original file
124 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on fontana.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Firms Rank
JT2 Integrated Resources
Oakland, CA 1
Innovative Claim Solutions
San Ramon, CA 2
Pegasus Risk Management
Modesto, CA 3
Third Party Administrator
SP-90-HR-22
Final - Review
Firms Total Score
JT2 Integrated Resources
Oakland, CA 96%
Innovative Claim Solutions
San Ramon, CA 81%
Pegasus Risk Management
Modesto, CA 50%
Third Party Administrator
SP-90-HR-22
Final - Review

FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)

WEIGHT SCORE

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF

COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm
20% 4.0 20%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 10% 4.0 10%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 10% 3.3 8%

2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 15% 3.3 13%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
15% 4.0 15%

3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 30% 4.0 30%
TOTAL 100% 3.8 96%
JT2 integrated Resources
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.

SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent

SCORING MATRIX
Third Party Administator
SP-90-HR-22

FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)

WEIGHT SCORE

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF

COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm
20% 3.3 17%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 10% 3.3 8%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 10% 3.3 8%

2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 15% 3.3 13%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
15% 3.3 13%

3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 30% 3.0 23%
TOTAL 100% 3.3 81%
Innovative Claim Solutions
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.

SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent

SCORING MATRIX
Third Party Administator
SP-90-HR-22

FACTOR WEIGHT SCORE
(0-4)

WEIGHT SCORE

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF

COMPANY/CONSULTANT
Relevant Experience of Firm
20% 2.3 12%
Reputation of Firm (Based on
references) 10% 2.3 6%
Qualifications of Personnel
(Experience, training, etc.) 10% 2.0 5%

2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
Responsiveness to meet or
exceed scope of services 15% 1.7 6%
Ability to communicate service
in an organized, clear, and
concise manner
15% 1.7 6%

3. SERVICE SCHEDULE
List of Ancillary Services they
Provided are Disclosed 30% 2.0 15%
TOTAL 100% 2.0 50%
Pegasus Risk Management
Please rate the proposal for each criterion below, using a scale of 0 through 4, where 0=unacceptable; 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=excellent. Provide details on each criterion scored 0 or 1.

SCORE: 0=Unacceptable 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4= Excellent

SCORING MATRIX
Third Party Administator
SP-90-HR-22

← All documents from this meeting