1 16498.00150\32126437.1
CITY OF FONTANA
DRAFT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
SP-93-DE-23
This Agreement is made and entered into as of May 9, 2023 by and between the City of Fontana, a public agency organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California 92335 (“City”), and Engineering Resources of Southern California Inc, a Corporation with its principal place of business at 1861 W. Redlands Blvd., Redlands. CA 92373 (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.
RECITALS
A. City is a public agenc y of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project:
Date Elementary School Street Improvements Project (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).
B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services.
C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Services.
Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
2. Compensation.
a. Subject to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit “B.” b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of $ 160,310.00. This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis.
3. Additional Work.
If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall
2 16498.00150\32126437.1
be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement.
4. Maintenance of Records.
Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaini ng to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City.
5. Term
The term of this Agreement shall be from May 9, 2023 to May 9, 2025 , unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Project. Consultant shall perfo rm its services in a prompt and timely manner within the term of this Agreement and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed (“Notice to Proceed”). The Notice to Proceed shall set forth the date of commencement of work.
6. Delays in Performance.
a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non - performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint.
b. Should such circumstances occur, the non -performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement.
7. Compliance with Law.
a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement.
8. Standard of Care
3 16498.00150\32126437.1
Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions.
9. Assignment and Subconsultant
Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates, and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder.
10. Independent Contractor
Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Commercial General Liability
(i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance mu st include coverage for the following:
(1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage
(2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury
(3) Premises/Operations Liability
(4) Products/Completed Operations Liability
(5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project
(6) Explosion, Col lapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted
(7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage
(9) Independent Contractors Coverage
4 16498.00150\32126437.1
(iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4 ) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(v) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either d eductibles or provide coverage excess of a self -insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. b. Automobile Liability
(i) At all times during the perform ance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City.
(ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto).
(iii) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention.
c. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability
(i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement.
(ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Ag reement, all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act,” Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section.
d. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant shall
5 16498.00150\32126437.1
maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein.
This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. e. Minimum Policy Limits Required
(i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement:
Combined Single Limit
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/ $2,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property
damage
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions)
(ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. f. Evidence Required
Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25 -S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance.
g. Policy Provisions Required
(i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior writte n notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General
6 16498.00150\32126437.1
Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration.
(ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss.
(iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroa ctive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement.
(iv) All required insurance coverages , except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability.
Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law.
h. Qualifying Insurers
(i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements:
(1) Each such policy shall be f rom a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.
i. Additional Insurance Provisions
(i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(ii) If at any time durin g the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is
7 16498.00150\32126437.1
canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any li ability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement.
j. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements . Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section.
Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants.
12. Indemnification.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consul tant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
b. If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance of “design professional” services (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782. 8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a fi nal adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
13. California Labor Code Requirements.
a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects (“Prevailing Wage Laws”). If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total
8 16498.00150\32126437.1
compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws . It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1) . The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. c. This Agreement may al so be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Dep artment of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issue d by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor.
14. Verification of Employment Eligibility.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and f ederal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same.
15. Reserved.
16. Laws and Venue.
This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 17 Termination or Abandonment
9 16498.00150\32126437.1
a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasona ble value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed duri ng such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the c harges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work.
b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provid e further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant.
18 Documents. Except as otherwise provided in “Termination or Abandonment,” above, all original field notes, written reports, Drawings and Specifications and other documents, produced or developed for the Project shall, upon payment in full for the services described in this Agreement, be furnished to and become the property of the City.
19. Organization
Consultant shall assign Lori J. Askew as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City.
20. Limitation of Agreement.
This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described above.
21. Notice
Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to:
CITY:
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, California 92335
Attn: Jeffrey Kim, Department of Engineering
CONSULTANT:
Engineering Resources of Southern
California, Inc.
1861 W. Redlands Blvd.
Redlands, CA 92373
Attn: Lori J. Askew
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.
10 16498.00150\32126437.1
22. Third Party Rights
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant.
23. Equal Opportunity Employment.
Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.
24. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with resp ect to those ma tters covered hereunder. Each P arty acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may n ot be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement.
25. Severability
The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the remaining provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal.
26. Successors and Assigns
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, admi nistrators and assigns of each P arty to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void.
27. Non-Waiver
None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either P arty, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.
28. Time of Essence
Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
29. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants
City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects.
30. Prohibited Interests
11 16498.00150\32126437.1
Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtai n any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
31. Federal Requirements
When funding for the services is provided, in whole or in part, by an agency of the federal government, Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with the p rovisions included in Exhibit “D ” (Federal Requirements) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Federal Requirements”). With respect to any conflict between such Federal Requirements and the terms of this Agreement and/or the provisions of state law, the more stringent requirement shall control.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
12 16498.00150\32126437.1
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF FONTANA
By:
Matthew C. Ballantyne
City Manager
Engineering Resources of Southern
California Inc.
By:
[INSERT NAME]
[INSERT TITLE]
Attest:
By:
Germaine McClellan Key
City Clerk
By:
[INSERT NAME]
[INSERT TITLE]
Approved as to form:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
By: ______________________________
Rakesha Thomas
Human Resources & Risk Management Director
IN COMPLIANCE WITH PURCHASING AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION POLICIES/PROCEDURES
___________________________________
Chief Financial Officer
Purchasing Office
13 16498.00150\32126437.1
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
Proposal for Design Services - Date Elementary
School Street Improvements Project
Submitted: February 28, 2023
Revised per Negotiation Meeting with City on 4/18/2023
Local Office:
1861 W. Redlands Blvd.
Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 890-1255, [email protected]
Evaluation Period Contact:
Lori Askew
Project Manager
(909) 890-1255 x110
[email protected]
1861 W . Redlands Blvd. | Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 890-1255 | [email protected] | www.erscinc.com
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
February 28, 2023
City of Fontana
Purchasing Office
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Attn: Elia Alvarez
RE: Proposal for Design Services for Date Elementary School Street Improvement Project (SP- 93-DE-23)
Dear Ms. Alvarez:
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. (ERSC) is pleased to have the opportunity to submit our qualifications, in addition to those of our subconsultant, to the City of Fontana (City) as qualified and experienced consultants to provide Professional Civil Engineering Services. Based upon our review of the RFP , knowledge of civil engineering, and consultation of available supporting documents we have developed a thorough understanding of the scope of services in order to provide outstanding service to the City.
Matt Brudin, P .E. - Principal-in-Charge
Matt Brudin will serve as ERSC’s Principal-in-Charge during the term of a potential agreement with the City. Mr. Brudin brings over 25 years of civil engineering experience in complex planning, design, and construction projects. His ability to effectively communicate with agency personnel and team members provides the vital link between client and consultant and ensures that the goals of each project are met. Mr. Brudin has a broad base of experience in various disciplines including site development, streets and roads, grading and drainage, and flood control facilities. Matt will provide design guidance, QA/QC, and industry expertise to the ERSC team.
Lori Askew, Project Manager
Lori Askew will serve as ERSC’s Project Manager during the term of a potential agreement with the City. She has over 30 years of Civil Engineering design and management experience in Public Works projects. She spent 20 of those years as a municipal employee, so she understands the intricacies of working in a local agency. The City can be confident that this project is to be executed under the supervision and guidance of highly trained professionals while under Lori’s leadership.
ERSC understands that the City wants to select the firm that best fits the goals of the City. In selecting ERSC, the City will benefit from the following:
• Familiarity – ERSC has served numerous municipal agencies and our Project Manager has intimate knowledge of the workings of multiple municipalities.
• Experience – ERSC’s familiarity with all civil engineering disciplines. Our firm focuses solely on the public sector and public works projects.
• Partnerships – ERSC has worked closely with the partners listed in this proposal and has selected them based on expertise and experience in the discipline.
By selecting ERSC, the City will benefit from the wealth of knowledge and experience that our team possesses, and we are confident in our abilities to go above and beyond to deliver exceptional service to the City.
I have read, understood, and agree to all statements in this Request for Proposal and acknowledge receipt of all addendum/amendments as well as to the terms, conditions, and attachments referenced. This proposal shall be valid for a period of not less than 120 calendar days from the closing date and time of the Request for Proposal.
We look forward to the possibility of working with the City and thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at [email protected] or (909) 890-1255, ext. 103; or Ms. Askew at ext. 110.
Respectfully submitted,
John M. Brudin, PE, QSD Lori J. Askew
President Principal Engineer
T able of Contents
Work Plan ................................................................................................................. 1 Firm Information & Background ............................................................................... 6 Appendix - Resumes
Work Plan
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
It is understood the City of Fontana (City) desires to have sidewalk constructed where none currently exists along Fontana Avenue between Athol Street and Merrill Avenue and on the southside of Merrill Avenue from Fontana Avenue westerly for around 350’ to where sidewalk currently exists. The sidewalk will provide a safe walking surface for pedestrians where there currently is none causing pedestrians to be forced to walk within the vehicular travel lanes or dirt shoulder. The sidewalk will be constructed within existing City right-of-way and where possible will be constructed at its ultimate location. Where ultimate right-of-way does not currently exist, the sidewalk will be constructed within current right-of-way limits with the street section being approved by the City prior to commencing design. The street section will be designed to be constructed with asphalt pavement, concrete curb and gutter, and concrete sidewalk. Improvements will also include
access ramps conforming to current ADA
standards, street signing and striping,
which will include a Class II bike lane, and
traffic signal modifications at Fontana
Avenue and Merrill Avenue. Both
Fontana Avenue and Merrill Avenue are
classified as Primary Highways with up to
4 lanes and up to 104-foot right of way,
per the City’s Hierarchy of Streets, dated
September 10, 2019. City Std. Plan No.
401 and 402 identify Primary Highways
with 104-foot right of way, 80-foot curb
to curb dimension, 12-foot parkway with
6-foot sidewalk. ERSC will adhere to
these guidelines as much as possible and
practical.
It is understood there is no intent to
acquire property within the scope of this
project.
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK A - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ERSC will work with the City to schedule a project kick-off meeting. The intent of this meeting will be to introduce both sides of the Team and understand the varying roles of team members. This meeting will allow our team to review any changes in project scope, ask and answer questions that either side may have on the Project and understand any special requirements the City may request as a part of the project. This task also includes attendance at monthly progress/milestone meetings, whether held in the field, office or via teleconference, as directed by the City, occurring throughout the duration of the project design. In addition, this task will include the management of the project for ERSC design services, but not limited to: invoicing, filing, schedule updates and various administrative tasks.
TASK B – DATA COLLECTION
As-Built Research, Investigation & Review
ERSC will perform research of all record data available, including as-built documents, traffic data and any other available record data by utilizing the city of Fontana’s Public Records Portal. Our team will coordinate with the City to obtain any record drawings for the project area, including, but not limited to: Street Improvements, Signing and Striping, Street Lights, Storm Drainage, Water, Sewer, Traffic Signals and other Utilities. Our team will utilize this data in the design of the project, and will incorporate it into the project drawings for records purposes.
Utility Coordination, Research & Notification
ERSC will perform utility research by obtaining all utility information within the project limits. This will include, but not be limited to: Southern California Gas, Verizon, Southern California Edison and Spectrum. Several of these utilities have visible appurtenances located within the current street right-of-way. Our team will perform an initial notice via email (with return receipt) or certified mail Deliverables:
• Meeting Agenda and Minutes
• Monthly Invoices with Progress
Reports
• Schedule Updates
1 Work Plan
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
return receipt depending on the organization. Correspondence is recommended to be on City letterhead, sent from a City email account in order to avoid fees from the various carriers, and will be documented and filed in the project files. Record maps will be used to show locations on the plans.
ERSC will provide further field investigations to locate, identify, verify locations, and determine the status of existing utilities. In addition, our team will obtain and review all applicable base map plans, atlas maps, substructure maps, specifications, reports, and record data
for all existing utilities, agencies, and
companies involved in the project area.
All utility research shall be incorporated on
plan and profile drawings and applicable
details as part of a Comprehensive Utility
Plan.
Upon completion of the final design
drawings and approval by the City, ERSC
will provide all affected utility agencies final
plans as well as a construction schedule.
Survey and Mapping
ERSC will provide the aerial targets required for Inland Aerial Surveys, Inc., who will fly the project and produce the survey at a 1” = 40’ scale with a 1’ contour interval. ERSC will research available record information pertaining to the project area including Tract Maps, Records of Survey, Parcel Maps, and Right of Way maps in order to prepare the base maps for which the street design will be based upon. The project site will be flown to have survey provided that extends minimally 50-feet beyond the project limits and width of minimally 120-feet.
ERSC will perform office and field work required to prepare the background for the design. Staff will research and review available survey records at the County of San Bernardino and City of Fontana. Survey control will be established to confirm horizontal and vertical control. ERSC will perform a field topographic survey of the project limits identifying all surface topography as shown in the aerial and collecting elevations for such topography.
Survey for surface topography will be gathered for both sides of Fontana Avenue from Athol Street to Merrill Avenue, and the south side of Merrill Avenue from Fontana Avenue westerly to where curb, gutter and sidewalk currently exist. Survey will locate right of way, curb, gutter, sidewalk, edge of pavement, trees, streetlights, signage, and surface utilities, with the specific intention of identifying obstructions in the way for installation of the street widening and construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk. Data will be collected to provide for plotting cross sections at 25-foot intervals. Elevations at all proposed join points will be obtained and all existing ADA ramps will be checked to confirm they meet current standards.
Geotechnical Investigation and Report
Geotechnical Investigation is not required for this project.
TASK C - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PREPARATION & COORDINATION
With information gathered in prior tasks, ERSC will create base maps for the plans to be designed upon. The record drawings obtained from the City and utility information received will be meshed with the surface items obtained from the survey to create a comprehensive base plan in which to prepare demolition and improvement plans. It is anticipated that all to scale plans will be prepared at 1”=40’ scale (except for the Traffic Signal Plans), unless a larger scale is necessary to provide clarity. All submittals shall include electronic versions of the documents in a format acceptable to the City.
Street Improvement Plans
With the base maps created for the various plans, street improvement plans will provide plan and profile. The plan will show both sides of the street from right of way lines and all existing surface and below grade topography. Curb and gutter will be placed at ultimate location where right of way allows. This is anticipated on the northwesterly side of Fontana Avenue where the half-street right-of-way appears to be 50 or 52-feet. And also on the southeasterly side of Fontana Ave. from Lemon St. to Merrill Avenue where the half-street right-of-way varies from 50 to 52-feet. The portion of Fontana Ave. between Athol St. and Lemon St. is consistent at a half street right-of-way of 35-feet. The southside of Merrill Avenue appears to have a half-street right-of-way of 44-feet west of Deliverables:
• Topographic Base Map at 40’ scale
with 1’ contour intervals (Autocad
format)
• Digital Terrain Model (DTM surface)
• Survey Control Plan & Corner Record
Deliverables:
• Copies of all correspondence/notices with affected utility agencies • Copies of maps and record data provided from the affected utility agencies.
Assumptions:
• Based on a review of the location and scope of work, our team anticipates there may be a necessity for potholing various utilities appurtenances where grade changes occur and also Traffic Signal appurtenances. Potholing will be further defined below and included in the Fee Proposal.
Deliverables:
• 60%, 90% and 100% Progress Plans – 24” x 36” size bond paper ○ Plans include Stree t, Signing & Striping, Traffic Signal Modification, Fiber Optic (Optional) – All plans at 40’ scale, except Traffic Signal at 20’ scale.
• Final Plan - (24” x 36” Size Mylars)
○ Plans include all submitted fr om 100%, at scales identified. 2 Work Plan
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Fontana Avenue. ERSC will propose a street section for approval by the City prior to commencing with design for the areas that are not at ultimate right-of-way. The profile will show the existing grade at the centerline, possibly where edge of existing pavement is to be joined and where proposed curb will be located. The proposed top of curb profile will also be shown. Street Improvement Plans will also provide street typical sections, cross-sections, horizontal control, join points, off-site grading (if necessary) and any other information deemed necessary to produce a comprehensive construction plan.
Sheets containing cross-sections at 25-foot intervals shall be plotted at 8-foot horizontal and 0.8-foot vertical scales for the entire length of the project.
Signing and Striping Plans
STC will prepare the signing and striping plans at a scale of 1” = 40’. The plans will include full geometry of Fontana Avenue between Athol Street and Merrill Avenue, and extend a minimum of 50 feet beyond the advance detection on Fontana Avenue on each end of the corridor. The plans will show existing signing, striping, pavement, and curb markings, required removals, required signs to be protected in place, and proposed improvements for ultimate alignment. Pavement delineation will include appropriate turn pocket lengths based on available traffic counts and queuing analysis with transitional areas to join into existing lanes. Plans will identify the location and type of all existing/proposed signs by CA-MUTCD sign code. Plans will include provisions to remove and replace existing signs with new and improved signs to meet the latest retro-reflectivity requirements, as needed. STC is aware that the City of Fontana’s Design Standards require that there shall be no breaks in the plan layout occurring within 500 feet of any intersection.
Traffic Signal Modification Plans
STC will prepare a traffic signal modification plan for Merrill Avenue and Fontana Avenue at a scale of 1” = 20’. The base plan will show existing right of way lines, roadway centerlines, curb, gutter and sidewalk, existing signs and traffic controls, and utilities of record. All traffic signal components will be drafted using the latest CAD standards for traffic signal design. Plans will include general notes, construction notes, phase diagrams, pole and equipment schedules, conduit and conductor schedules, legend listing each utility symbol, and details for traffic signal controller cabinet assembly location, type of controller, pole locations and foundations, pull boxes, conduits, loops, and splicing.
Other elements of design will include EVP systems, pole and mast-arm signage, APS and countdown signal heads, battery back-up systems within the controller cabinet, license plate reader cameras, and LED safety lighting.
Advertisement/Construction Support
ERSC’s Project Manager and STC key personnel will work closely with City staff to respond to bid RFI’s. Should addenda be required, the ERSC team will assist the City with preparation. All written responses to Bidder inquiries will be provided within two working days of receipt. During the construction phase, ERSC’ Team will provide review of shop drawings and materials/product submittals for conformance with the plans and
specifications. ERSC staff will be available
to review change orders and provide
clarification of design intent when
necessary.
Fiber Optic Interconnect Plans
STC will prepare separate traffic signal interconnect plans at 1” = 40’ scale to achieve fiber optic interconnect between Athol Street and Merrill Avenue on Fontana Avenue. STC will coordinate with the City to determine if a single conduit or multiple conduit duct bank will be installed between the signals. The Design will include the locations of conduit and pull box installation, call out for necessary equipment in each of the two existing traffic signal cabinets, and fiber optic splice diagrams.
Potholing for Traffic Signal
If potholing new traffic signal pole locations is deemed necessary during preliminary design, competitive quotes will be requested from three (3) companies to complete potholing utilizing the “X-Trench” method. This work will include potholing traffic signal pole using “X-Trench” method, to full depth and width of the respective foundation plus 10%; removal of sidewalk panels for pothole operations and permanent replacement of sidewalk panels as needed; Dig Alert coordination and delineation; encroachment permit; vacuum excavation to top of utility, encasement or stop depth; vacuum excavation spoil removal and dumping; standard traffic control.; 1-sack PCC slurry backfill or concrete class 100E-100; engineered traffic control plans; permanent cold patch; removal of debris; and, detailed pothole report with photographs. Potholing will take place at the 100% design process, following the 90% review and revision. STC will produce an exhibit detailing traffic signal pole foundations, width, and depth along with station and offset to aid in locating each pole location in the field. STC’s design engineer will be present during potholing to observe and verify each pothole location is correct before potholing operations begin. The design engineer will be available if any issues arise and if any new potholing locations are required. The fee included for this task is an estimate of the anticipated quote based upon two potholes for traffic signals and on previous experience but is subject to change when quotes are received.
Deliverables:
• Written responses to RFI’s, process shop drawings and submittals, and construction design changes.
Deliverables:
• Pothole Map and Final Report
3 Work Plan
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
TASK D - COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN, UTILITY COORDINATION &
POTHOLING
Using the base sheets created for the prior tasks, ERSC’s team will create a comprehensive utility plan indicating all utilities’ current and ultimate disposition (remain, remove, relocate). Utilities included will be all above and below grade, wet and dry, overhead power poles, lines and other appurtenances, manholes, valves, laterals and any other identified utilities. The plan will identify each utility size, material and any identifying information for the item. Utility owner with contact information will be included in a matrix on the plan with responsibility for removals and/or relocations and the design for any new utility required to be constructed.
Utility potholing for this plan will occur once all utilities have been mapped, site verified at the surface and included on the Composite Utility Plan. The proposed design will be overlayed on the Utility Plan and areas of conflict will be identified. Besides looking for physical conflicts, grade change will be looked at to see if minimum/maximum cover criteria for the various utility is compromised. Once areas of conflict are determined, a map will be generated for pothole location and submitted to at least three Pothole companies to obtain competitive bids. ERSC will work with the pothole contractor to pull a City No-Fee Encroachment Permit.
Our fee estimate includes a lump sum cost for potholing work by a utility pothole company and/ or contractor. The fee is based upon the assumption of 10 potholes to locate existing utilities.
TASK E - CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE & SPECIFICATIONS
ERSC will prepare the Technical Provisions of the Specifications and the Bidding Schedule which will identify all Civil Engineering related bid items for the project for incorporation into the General Provisions part of the Specifications which will be supplied by the City of Fontana. Specifications will be
prepared, based upon the latest edition
of the Greenbook and Caltrans, in Word
format and Engineer’s Estimate will be
prepared in Excel format, unless requested
differently.
TASK F - RECORD DRAWINGS
ERSC will revise the necessary construction plans to incorporate plan revisions due to construction changes. Within thirty (30) days following the completion and acceptance of the Project, ERSC will furnish a complete set of As-Builts on Bond paper to the City.
Revisions will be solely based upon as-built information provided to the City and ERSC by the City’s Construction Manager and the Contractor. Upon approval of bond copy of plans by the City, ERSC will plot the As-Builts on Mylar for submittal to the City for their records.
EXCLUSIONS
This proposal does not include preparation of Hydrology/Hydraulic Analysis or Reports, WQMP or SWPPP Plans/Reports.
SCHEDULE
Please see the following page.
Deliverables:
• Composite Utility Plan – 24” x 36” size bond paper
○ Plan at 40’ scale or 20’ scale if needed for clarity
○ Pothole Map and Final Report
○ Submitted within 60 calendar days of NTP
Deliverables:
• Bid Schedule and Engineer’s Estimate for Civil Engineering related items at 65% Submittal
• Technical Provisions, Bid Schedule and Engineer’s Estimate at 90% Submittal • Final Technical Provisions, Bid Schedule and Engineer’s Estimate at 100% Submittal Deliverables:
• Final “as-built” drawings reflecting
construction changes
4 Work Plan
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Schedule
5 Firm Information & Background
Executive Summary
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. (ERSC) was formed in 1996 with the asset purchase of NBS/Lowry, Inc. Since formation, ERSC has been committed to serving Special Districts, Regional Agencies, and Municipalities in Southern California’s public sector. Our team provides a comprehensive set of professional services and solutions for the life of any potential project.
ERSC Professionals
The strength behind ERSC is our qualified and experienced engineers, designers, construction observation personnel, and administrative support staff. We excel at matching the exceptional skills, technical abilities, character, and attitude of our team members to the needs of our clients. ERSC staff works daily to create client partnerships and transform projects from the broadest level of general scope to final planning, design, implementation, and construction resolution.
Project Contact
Lori Askew
Principal Engineer
1861 W. Redlands Blvd.
Redlands, CA 92373
Phone: (909) 890-1255
Fax: (909) 890-0995
[email protected]
Construction
Management &
Inspection
Survey & Mapping
Environmental
Services
Civil Site Design
T ransportation/
T raffic Engineering
Independent Plan
Review
Water/Wastewater
Engineering
Water Quality/NPDES
Flood Control &
Drainage Engineering
Professional &
General Liability $1.0m Per Occurrence; $2.0m Aggregate Automobile $1.0m Combined Single Limit
Worker’s Comp Maintained as Required by Law
ERSC Insurance Coverage Levels
Vital Information
CA Corporation
25 Y ears in Business
37 Employees
FEIN: 33-0718153
CA DIR: 1000017460
Corporate Officers
John M. Brudin, PE - President
Moe Ahmadi, PE - Vice President
T rent Brudin, PE - Secretary
Craig Brudin - T reasurer
Our Locations
Redlands
(Corporate Office)
1861 W. Redlands Blvd.
Redlands, CA 92373
R
T
P
T emecula
41593 Winchester Rd., Suite 200
T emecula, CA 92590
Palm Desert
77-564 Country Club Dr.
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Many ERSC professionals have experience as municipal and public agency employees and can approach your project with first-hand knowledge of agency culture and how any agency envisions the planning and processing of a well-executed project.
ERSC Reliability
Our 25-year service record is a testimony to the quality of services we provide. Many of our clients continue to seek our services, and have done so since our first year of business. ERSC has also developed significant financial resources and organizational efficiencies that allow us to consistently exceed client expectations.
6 Firm Information & Background
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Subconsultants
John M. Brudin, PE
Principal in Charge
Lori Askew
Project Manager
STC Traffic, Inc.
Traffic Engineering Trent Budin, PE
Project Engineer
Katherine Hernandez
Project Designer
Proposed Project Team
References
PW 19-11 Bike Lane & Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail | Project Term: 2020 - Ongoing | Contract Value (to date): $550,286
Under an on-call engineering agreement, the City of Temecula contracted with ERSC for the preliminary and final engineering services necessary to provide project scoping and final design for the Temecula Creek South Side Trail Project. The Temecula Creek South Side Trail is part of a larger trail loop identified in the City’s Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update (Master Plan) as the Temecula Loop.
More specifically identified as Gap Closure Alternative 15(GCA 15). Services required to complete the project will be provided in two (2) phases, including an investigation and summary of the potential issues affecting the project and the development of contract documents including plans, specifications and estimates.
Overland Drive Widening | Project Term: 2020 - Ongoing | Contract Value (to date): $273,445 In early 2020, ERSC began and completed an analysis of the impacts related to the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive. The project included mapping and an evaluation of the effects of a roadway widening project on private and public improvements within the project area.
ERSC will coordinate with the Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts for relocation and adjustment of water and sewer facilities, as well as various power and communications companies for the relocation of dry utilities impacted by the project (pad mount transformers, underground vaults, and service pedestals).
At Overland Drive and Commerce Center Drive, a previous project resulted in the installation of conduit and pull boxes associated with future traffic signal construction and the previously installed conduit and pull boxes, and the easterly leg of Overland Drive, require reconstruction. The widening project will include the installation of a new traffic signal and striping modifications, and installation of new street lighting including street light plans developed per industry standards and City of Temecula standards and guidelines. ERSC’s project team will also prepare legal descriptions and plats in support of the right-of- way acquisition effort.
PW20-02 Fifth Street Improvements | Project Term: 2020 | Contract Value: $37,589 Under an on-call engineering agreement, ERSC provided survey and engineering services for preparation of street improvement plans for the north of side of Fifth Street from Front Street to the Murrieta Creek.
This project is subject to the elements of the Old Town Specific plan and the design criteria therein. The specific plan requires on-street parking, a 12-foot pedestrian mall, and a round-a-bout. ERSC collected record data, performed survey data collection in the field with 25-foot street cross sections, drafted a conceptual design for approval, and prepared plan specifications and estimates for the project
CITY OF TEMECULA, CA
ERSC Project Team:
John M. Brudin, PE
Lori Askew
Katherine Hernandez
Nino Abad, PE, Project
Manager
(951) 308-6385
[email protected]
Chris White, Associate
Enginer II
(951) 308-6388
[email protected]
7 Firm Information & Background
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Murrieta Creek Bridge | Project Term: 2019 - Ongoing | Contract Value (to date):
$316,092
As a partner to the CNS Engineers’ team, ERSC is providing engineering design services to the City of Temecula’s Overland/Murrieta Creek Bridge Project. The project will extend Overland Drive through Commerce Center Drive, Enterprise Circle West, over the Murrieta Creek, and connecting to the Avenida Alvarado at the Diaz Road intersection, including the construction of two traffic signals at each of the intersections.
This ongoing project holds many challenges due to the consolidation and incorporation of several City projects that have been either designed or partially developed. Hydraulic modeling of the creek was prepare to analyze the pre- and post-improvement conditions and impacts as part of the work. ERSC is also responsible for navigating permitting/coordination challenges through various agencies including the Army Corps of Engineers, Riverside County Flood Control District, Rancho California Water District, and Eastern Municipal Water District.
Traffic Signal System – Rancho California Road & Tee Drive | Project Term: 2020-21 | Contract Value:
$27,379
Under an on-call engineering agreement, the City of Temecula contracted with ERSC for the design a new traffic signal system at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, including a new power source. Aside from typical utilities, ERSC’s work will include exploration and evaluation of several blow offs, valves and manholes valves within or adjacent the intersection that indicating there is water, recycled water and sewer in the vicinity, as well as overhead electrical lines along the south side of the intersection. Staff are also exploring removing existing streetlights in the intersection and replacing them with traffic signal safety lighting. The City is also currently undergoing streetlight conversions to LED as a part of the WRCOG Regional Streetlight Program. In addition to the utilities, the proposed design will incorporate necessary features to facilitate bicycle crossings at the intersection per the City of Temecula’s Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan.
Rehabilitation of Alicia Parkway
The City of Aliso Viejo contracted with ERSC for the rehabilitation of Alicia Parkway from Pacific Park Drive to City limits. Alicia Parkway is classified as a Major Arterial (6-Lanes, Divided) per the City of Aliso Viejo General Plan, Circulation Element. In addition, the Circulation Element calls for a Class II “bike lane” along this segment of roadway. To assist the City of Aliso Viejo in maintaining the condition and riding surface of Alicia Parkway, ERSC prepared all necessary survey, roadway improvement plans and specifications, as well as signing and striping and traffic control plans.
Rehabilitation of Pacific Park Drive
The City of Aliso Viejo contracted with ERSC for the rehabilitation of Pacific Park Drive from Aliso Viejo Parkway to Aliso Creek Road. Pacific Park Drive is classified as a Major Arterial (6-Lanes, Divided) per the City of Aliso Viejo General Plan, Circulation Element. In addition, the Circulation Element calls for a Class II “bike lane” along this segment of roadway. To assist the City of Aliso Viejo in maintaining the condition and riding surface of Pacific Park, ERSC will prepare roadway improvement plans and specifications, as well as signing and striping and traffic control plans for full depth replacement of failed pavement and base, sidewalk improvements, and ADA improvements.
ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
Project Term: 2021 - Ongoing | Contract Value (to date): $403,865 ERSC Project Team:
John M. Brudin, PE
Trent Brudin, PE
Shaun S. Pelletier, P .E.,
Public Works Director/City
Engineer
(949) 425-2533
[email protected]
5th Street/Greenspot Road Bikeway Improvements | Project Term: 2013-2019 | Contract Value: $143,860 ERSC was retained by the City of Highland to engineering and construction services for the City’s widening of 5th Street/Greenspot road and bikeway improvements. As the City completed the new Greenspot Bridge over the Santa Ana River, it was necessary to widen the road and the old iron bridge would be access restricted to bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
Upon completion 5th Street/Greenspot Road would be widened to accommodate 2 travel lanes in each direction with a painted center median and bike lanes. Total length of the widening was approximately 6,000LF.
At Santa Ana Canyon Road, the Bikeway would be taken out of the Greenspot Road alignment and onto a new trail system. This trail would include a fully signed and striped bike/pedestrian trail that followed the previous alignment of Greenspot Road. This trail includes the historic Iron Bridge at Santa Ana Canyon Road. As a part of the project, ERSC designed the trail, signing/striping, and 30 way finding signs/access points along the alignment.
CITY OF HIGHLAND, CA
ERSC Project Team:
John M. Brudin, PE
Trent Brudin, PE
Lori Askew
Carlos Zamano, P .E.
Assistant Public Works
Director
(909) 864-6861
[email protected]
8 Firm Information & Background
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Tippecanoe Pavement Rehabilitation | Project Term: 2021 - Ongoing | Contract Value: $150,535 (to date)
ERSC provided professional engineering services related to Cooperative City/County Pavement Rehabilitation Project, str20003 pavement rehabilitation of five street reaches covering four streets. For Tippecanoe Avenue, existing AC and native material was pulverized in place, a portion of the pulverized material removed, cement added to the remaining pulverized material, followed by placement of HMA and RHMA for the reach from 3rd to 6th.
Sector E Pavement Rehabilitation | Project Term: 2020 - Ongoing | Contract Value: $203,595 (to date) ERSC was retained by the City of Highland to provide engineering services related to the City’s proposed Pavement Management Program, Sector E, Pavement Rehabilitation, str20001. The City has proposed rehabilitation of 15 streets in Sector E, located in the southeast portion of the City in an effort to complete implementation of its comprehensive 5-Year Pavement Management Program (PMP). The project is funded with SB – 1, local Measure I, and RAC grant funds.
The scope of work will also likely include design for features and/or replacements not yet identified nor quantified to protect the pavement investment from drainage damage and assure ADA compliance.
Additionally, formal striping/marking plans are anticipated to be required for the single arterial street, Greenspot Road. A flood channel crossing of Webster Street is located in SBCFCD right-of-way, and therefore may also entail coordination/permitting from that agency.
ERSC will conduct site visits to assess condition/location of the drainage related issues and of ADA compliance issues concerning damaged or missing ramps. To further assist we will contract with a subconsultant geotechnical firm for a visual inspection of all streets and additional subsurface investigation for the single arterial, Greenspot Road.
2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 CDBG Pavement Improvement Projects | Project Term: 2018-22 | Contract Value: $95,442
ERSC was retained by the City of Highland to provide engineering services for two CDBG-funded projects, for years 2018-19 and 2019-20. Both projects involve site inspection, pavement evaluation, review of drainage and ADA issues and preparation of construction documents for rehabilitation and repair. That for ola2018-2019 involves two streets, Elmwood Road, from Baseline to Fisher Street (1,800 linear feet); and Walker Street from Sterling Avenue to East end, (960 linear feet). Ola 2019-2020 includes two streets also, Del Rosa Avenue from 4th Street to 5th Street (720 linear feet), and Elm Street, from 6th Street to 9th Street (2,040 linear feet).
Funding will be provided by the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) administered by the County of San Bernardino Development and Housing Department. Specification document, therefore, will include applicable federal requirements. ERSC will coordinate with a subconsultant firm to conduct field investigations and provide recommendations for pavement and rehabilitation methods and costs.
A preliminary site inspection and recent experience and City practice indicate that rehabilitation is expected to include repair of severely distressed areas by pavement removal and replacement, crack repair/seal, bump grind, edge repair, header cut and cold planing, repair of drainage issues that would compromise new paving, repair of soft or wet subgrade, and HMA overlay. 9 Appendix
Over the past 25 years, Mr. Brudin has been
involved in a number of complex planning,
design and construction projects. His ability
to effectively communicate with agency
personnel and team members provides
the vital link between client and consultant
and ensures that the goals of each project
are met. Mr. Brudin has a broad base of
experience in various disciplines including
water resources, site development, streets
and roads, grading and drainage and flood
control facilities.
Mr. Brudin has served as a District
Engineer for the Lake Hemet Municipal
Water District, City Engineer for the City
of Hemet, and 1as a Project Manager for
“as-needed” professional engineering
plan check services for several cities in
the Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino
County areas. Under these contracts, he
has managed construction inspection/
administration, development review, and
plan check services for land development
and capital projects, including grading,
water, sewer, drainage, traffic signal and
street improvement plans.
CA, Civil Engineer No. C41836
QSD/QSP No. 00707
BS, Civil Engineering, Loyola Marymount
University, Los Angeles, CA
American Public Works Assc.
Floodplain Management Assc.
Water/Wastewater Engineering
Flood Control Engineering
Project Management
Quality Control
Education
Affiliations
Areas of Expertise
Similar Project Experience:
Overland Bridge at Murrieta Creek, CNS Engineers, Temecula, CA, 2020-Present, $316k to date - Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment. Design of a bridge structure over and across Murrieta Creek connecting Avenida Alvarado at the intersection of Diaz to the west of the creek, with Overland Drive at the intersection of Enterprise Circle to the east of the creek.
State Street Gap Closure Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, 2019-Present, $540k to date – Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment.
Roadway design and environmental clearance for the Street; a vital transportation corridor. State Street will be a four-lane roadway with a center median and bike lanes connecting Baseline Street to State Route 210.
40th Street Widening Project, City of San Bernardino, CA, 2017-18, $245k – Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment. Design of the 40th Street Widening Project in San Bernardino. 40th Street is to be widened to allow 4 travel lanes, new sidewalk, and drainage improvements. The project stretches from Victoria Ave to Kendall Drive. Also included is traffic signal modifications at Electric Ave. and drainage modifications.
Golden Avenue Bridge Replacement Project, Biggs Cardoza Associates, Placentia, CA, 2017-19, $107k - Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment. Development of plans for the bridge replacement project in Orange County. ERSC coordinated plans for channel modification and permitting with ACOE.
Riverside Drive Street Widening, Signal Modifications, Signing and Striping, Lake Elsinore, CA, 2016-17, $258k - Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment. Development of program documents and planning and design activities related to the reconstruction of an existing campground located along Riverside Drive on the westerly end of Lake Elsinore. Coordinated completion of all CalTrans requirements to facilitate completion of the project.
Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City of La Quinta, La Quinta, CA, 2019-21, $165k – Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment.
Design of intersection modifications incorporating a third left turn lane in each direction to reduce traffic during peak hours. The scope also included CEAQ document preparation, utility coordination and PS&E.
Traffic Signal System – Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, City of Temecula, Temecula, CA, 2020-21, $27k – Principal in Charge responsible for technical and budget oversight, resource allocation and contract management throughout the assignment. Design and utility coordination for a new traffic signal system, including a new power source.
Exploration and evaluation of several blow offs, valves and manholes valves, as well as overhead electrical lines along the south side of the intersection. Staff are also exploring removing existing streetlights in the intersection and replacing with traffic signal safety lighting. The City is also currently undergoing streetlight conversions to LED as a part of the WRCOG Regional Streetlight Program. The proposed design will incorporate necessary features to facilitate bicycle crossings at the intersection per the City of Temecula’s Multi- use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan.
John M. Brudin, PE | President
Ms. Askew has over 30 years of experience
in design and management of public and
private improvement projects. She has
spent the past 20 years as a local municipal
employee in Public Works with the last
eight years in an executive management
position overseeing various levels of
staff and consultants. She has managed
Capital Improvement Program projects
for streets, storm drains, water and sewer
in addition to large land development
projects with significant grading
challenges. She is very knowledgeable in
understanding the workings and challenges
of local government and comprehends the
constraints of various City funding sources
such as Gas Tax, Measure A and SB1.
Ms. Askew has been city liaison to Western
Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG),
Riverside County Flood Control & Water
Conservation District, Caltrans, Riverside
County Transportation Commission (RCTC),
several water districts and school boards.
Land Development
Municipal Engineering
Traffic and Transportation
Areas of Expertise
BS, Civil Engineering, Michigan Technological
University, Houghton, MI
Education
Similar Project Experience:
County Line Road Transportation Corridor Improvement Project: Project Manager for design and construction of street improvements including pavement widening to include bike lanes, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and construction of round-abouts at 4 intersections. Project is joint improvement project with adjacent city, as street centerline is City and County boundary. Project challenges include various funding sources through grants, coordination with adjacent city/county, right-of-way acquisitions, and construction in phases.
Calimesa Creek Storm Drain Improvements: Project manager overseeing design and construction for nearly 2,000 lf of 18” – 78” RCP storm drain pipe, 200lf of 6’ x 6’ concrete box structure and 53-acre-foot detention basin. Project will minimize erosion of Calimesa Creek by transitioning from an open channel system which currently discharges into Calimesa Creek, to a closed system. Only low flows will remain in the Creek, thus eliminating the need to mitigate significant acreage. Detention Basin upstream eliminates the need for existing pipe at downstream end of system to be enlarged under the I-10 freeway. Project is funded with EPA grant, Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Funds and City Development Impact Fees.
Third Street Improvement Project: Project Manager responsible for overseeing design and construction of 3,300 linear feet of Third Street from Valley View Avenue to Corona Avenue which includes removal of existing asphalt street and replacement with full street improvements, within existing right-of-way, consisting of curb, gutter, asphalt pavement, equestrian trail with fence, replacement of private improvements to match new grades.
Also included were storm drain improvements on Reservoir Drive, north and south of Third Street which involved installation of over 1,800 linear feet of 30-inch HDPE pipe and 400 linear feet of smaller size HDPE pipe. Funding for this portion of the project was through Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as one of their Master Drainage Plan projects.
Navy to Norco College (RCC) Sewer Improvements: Project designer and project manager overseeing construction of 1,100 linear feet of 8-inch VCP sewer line and related appurtenances from a lift station located on Navy property to a city owned SSMH located on the Norco College Campus. The biggest challenges for the project was finding a route through the Norco College Campus that allowed the sewer line to flow by gravity and a construction schedule that minimized disruption to the Campus.
Hamner Avenue Widening Project: Project Manager responsible for overseeing the design and construction of 3,600 linear feet of Hamner Avenue from the north City boundary to north of the Hamner Avenue Bridge. Hamner Avenue was widened from a two-lane street to three lanes in each direction but currently striped for two in each direction. Improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt pavement, relocation of a City of Norco 20-inch potable waterline, installation of a 30-inch waterline owned by the Chino Desalter Authority (as part of their future expansion), and storm drain improvements. The traffic signal at Citrus Street was modified for a four-way intersection to accommodate the future Silverlakes Equestrian and Sports Park. A 42-foot-wide by 15-foot-high causeway was constructed under Hamner Avenue south of Citrus Street to provide flood relief from the adjacent Santa Ana River and also provide access to the adjacent park on the west side of Hamner Avenue located in the City of Eastvale. A detention basin was constructed as part of the project and resides on the west side of Hamner Avenue, south of Citrus Street and acts as a desilting basin for the 72” storm drain that discharges to it. Hamner Avenue design took into consideration the future replacement of the Hamner Avenue Bridge.
Second Street Improvement Project: Project Manager overseeing the design portion of the project which was done by a contract engineer beginning in late 2004. The project consisted of widening Second Street, a designated collector street, to its ultimate right- of-way between the I-15 Freeway and Corona Avenue, with full street improvement consisting of curb, gutter, asphalt pavement, pedestrian-equestrian trail with fence, realignment of the intersection with Valley View Avenue, storm drain improvements and utility relocations. Design also included pavement rehabilitation of Second Street from Corona Avenue to Hillside Avenue. Land acquisition and coordination with Caltrans delayed construction of the project which did not begin until early 2011. Additional Lori Askew | Principal Engineer
Lori Askew | Principal Engineer
responsibilities for this project include construction management where I was responsible for overseeing all aspects of construction.
Auger/Grinder Sewage System Project: Responsible for the design of a wastewater system which incorporated a packaged wastewater auger/grinder system to be installed on California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) property. The system removed unwanted solids and sludge discharged from CRC prior to entering the collection system owned by the City of Norco and ultimately the treatment facility owned by Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA).
Cherry Valley Boulevard/I-10 Interchange: City Liaison to Riverside County Transportation Department who is acting as lead for the City of Calimesa on this project. The Project is the reconstruction of an interstate freeway interchange to accommodate significant residential and commercial growth surrounding the interchange. The Project is being processed through Caltrans with the Project Study Report having been completed and approved in 2018. It is now in the PA/ED phase. Interchange configuration alternatives being considered are Round-Abouts, Diverging Diamond and Partial Cloverleaf. Funding is secured up to the construction phase through Developer Impact Fees and credit agreements with the Western Riverside Council of Government’s (WRCOG) Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program.
Silverlakes Equestrian and Sports Park: Project Manager overseeing the concept creation, planning and construction of a City owned 122-acre parcel of land with a federal deed restriction over it for Park use only. Challenges included parcel being located in a flood zone adjacent to the Santa Ana River, working with the Army Corp of Engineers after a flooding of the property occurred during construction, development being funded privately by developer and crafting a 99-year lease to developer. Project has 25 soccer fields including natural and synthetic turf, competition horse arenas, paved and porous parking lots and eating facilities.
Mr. Brudin was introduced to the industry
in 2012 as an intern at Lake Hemet
Municipal Water District. Since then, he
has held positions as Assistant Project
Engineer and Project Engineer at C.W.
Driver, a general contracting firm, until
shortly after his graduation in 2015 when
he took a position as Associate Civil
Engineer at Parsons Corporation. Trent
joined the ERSC team as Engineer II in
early 2016.
Mr. Brudin’s time in the industry has been
spent providing hydrology studies, drainage
design, site grading, geometric site layout,
WQMP and SWPPP documentation,
intersection improvements, traffic signal
modifications, water and wastewater
pipeline design, water feasibility studies,
and so on.
CA, Professional Engineer No.90924
AZ, Professional Engineer No. 73812
QSD No. C90924
BS, Civil Engineering, Loyola Marymount
University, Los Angeles, CA
Site Layout & Geometrics
Hydrology & Drainage
AutoCAD Civil 3D
Traffic and Transportation
Water and Wastewater
SWPPP Compliance
SWPPP Development
Education
Areas of Expertise
Similar Project Experience:
Riverside Drive Street Widening, Signal Modifications, Signing and Striping, City of Lake Elsinore, Lake Elsinore, CA – Project Engineer in the development of program documents and planning and design activities related to the reconstruction of an existing campground located along Riverside Drive on the westerly end of Lake Elsinore. Steven coordinated completion of all CalTrans requirements to facilitate completion of the project.
Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive Triple Left Turn Lanes, City of La Quinta, La Quinta, CA – Project Engineer assisting in design of improvements to this high traffic intersection by adding a third, left turn lane in each direction of the intersection in order to alleviate traffic congestion and improve traffic flow. Ms. Hernandez also assisted on the detailed project description, plans, bid schedules, bid item descriptions, payment methods, engineer’s estimate, special provisions, technical specifications, and any specification detail sheets and relevant standard plans.
La Cadena and 8th Street Intersection Reconfiguration, City of Colton, CA – Project Engineer during reconfiguration of the La Cadena & 8th Street intersection. Staff created a concept considering the wishes of City staff and council members that would reconfigure the intersection. The new concept included a free right bypass lane protected by raised median for north west traffic on La Cadena. Traffic from surrounding residential streets would stop at the new intersection with turn restrictions and channeled through raised medians for additional traffic calming. The reconfiguration of the intersection also required reconfiguration of existing drainage improvements. 40th Street Widening Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA – Project Engineer for the design of the 40th Street Widening Project in San Bernardino. 40th Street is to be widened to allow 4 travel lanes, new sidewalk, and drainage improvements. The project stretches from Victoria Ave to Kendall Drive. The project requires ROW take from existing residences and businesses in the project vicinity to provide adequate length.
Also included is traffic signal modifications at Electric Ave. and drainage modifications.
State Street Gap Closure Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA – Project Engineer for roadway design and environmental clearance for the Street; a vital transportation corridor. The final four lane roadway will improve traffic circulation from Baseline Street to SR210 Freeway. State Street will be a four-lane roadway with a center median and bike lanes connecting Baseline Street to State Route 210. The design also includes a new roadway in the portion of the project where no transportation infrastructure exists, rehabilitating existing portions to updated standard, and connecting to existing portions to the north and south. ROW acquisition is required to complete the project.
Aliso Creek Road Rehab from Aliso Viejo Parkway to SR-73, City of Aliso Viejo, CA – Project Engineer on the design of the Aliso Creek Road Rehab project, which included the grind and overlay of the roadway, localized full depth replacements, signing and striping, traffic signal loops, traffic control and Caltrans Coordination. The project involved additional detailed design of ADA ramps at the SR-73 interchange and obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment permit.
Trent Brudin, PE, QSD | Engineer IV
Similar Project Experience:
State Street Gap Closure Project, City of San Bernardino, CA, 2019-Present, $540k to date - Project Engineer for roadway design and environmental clearance this vital transportation corridor. State Street will be a four-lane roadway with a center median and bike lanes connecting Baseline Street to State Route 210. The design includes a new roadway in the portion of the project where no transportation infrastructure exists, rehabilitating existing portions to updated standard, and ROW acquisition is also required.
Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive Triple Left Turn Lanes, City of La Quinta, CA, 2019-21, $165k – Project Engineer assisting in design of improvements to this high traffic intersection by adding a third, left turn lane in each direction of the intersection in order to alleviate traffic congestion and improve traffic flow. Ms. Hernandez also assisted on the detailed project description, plans, bid schedules, bid item descriptions, payment methods, engineer’s estimate, special provisions, technical specifications, and any specification detail sheets and relevant standard plans.
Traffic Signal System, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, City of Temecula, CA, 2020- 21, $27k - Project Engineer during the design and utility coordination for a new traffic signal system, including a new power source. Work includes exploration and evaluation of several blow offs, valves and manholes valves, as well as overhead electrical lines along the south side of the intersection. In addition to the utilities, the proposed design will incorporate necessary features to facilitate bicycle crossings at the intersection per the City of Temecula’s Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan.
Design of Murrieta Creek Bridge, City of Temecula, CA, 2020-Present, $316k to date – Assisting in the design of a bridge structure over Murrieta Creek connecting Overland Drive at the intersection of Enterprise Circle West on the east side of the Creek to Avenida Alvarado at the intersection of Diaz Road on the west side of the Creek. Ms. Hernandez also assists on the PS&E and utility research and coordination.
Aliso Creek Road Rehab from Aliso Viejo Parkway to SR-73, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2017-Present, $47k – Project Engineer on the design of this rehab project, which included the grind and overlay of the roadway, localized full depth replacements, signing and striping, traffic signal loops, traffic control and Caltrans Coordination. The project involved additional detailed design of ADA ramps at the SR-73 interchange and obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment permit.
Golden Avenue Bridge Replacement Project, Biggs Cardoza Associates, Placentia, CA, 2017-20, $107k - Project Engineer during the development of plans for the bridge replacement project in Orange County. ERSC coordinated plans for channel modification and permitting with ACOE. ERSC also provided geometric layout including aligning with existing streets, identification of existing utilities and storm drains, proposing new storm drain locations, an adequate bridge width to accommodate future traffic, pedestrian and bike flows, and the placement of the OC Bike Loop that is planned to run within the Carbon Creek channel.
Rancho Ave. A & N Street Intersection Improvements, City of Colton, CA, 2020-Present, $37k to date - Project Engineer during traffic and civil engineering services to the City of Colton to improve safety at the Rancho Avenue and N Street intersection. The new intersection will include reduced lanes from 2 to 1 approaching the intersection, signing/ striping improvements, permanent delineators, and a CalTrans High Tension Barrier System. Also provided services for design survey, pavement reconstruction, raised median, ADA, and curb and gutter improvements.
Katherine Hernandez | Engineer II
Ms. Hernandez is proficient in geographic
and environmental engineering, able to
identify and solve problems related to
environmental, geographical and territorial
resources, interrelated with social
processes and territorial ordering through
sustainable development. Qualified to make
cartography with modern technologies
related to geographic information systems
(GIS).
BS, Geographic and Environmental
Engineering, University of Applied and
Environmental Sciences (UDCA), Bogotà,
Colombia
Environmental Analysis
Water Resources
Planning
Education
Areas of Expertise
STC Traffic, Inc. | Traffic Engineering
STC Traffic, Inc.
Christian Lambarth, PE, TE, PTOE
Project Manager
Mr. Lambarth has over 1 3 years of experience in the management of traffic engineering projects in Southern California. He specializes in traffic signal design, signing and striping design, traffic control, traffic operational analysis, street lighting, and traffic signal interconnect. Mr.
Lambarth pulls from his years of experience in the transportation industry to develop PS&E that focuses on constructability , serving clients throughout Riverside County.
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services | Fontana, CA - As Project Manager, Mr. Lambarth was responsible for providing traffic signal modification for the intersection of N. Cherry Ave/Live Oak Ave. His ensured that the project deliverable exceeded expectations and conformed to City requirements and Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. The modified traffic signal will provide the intersection ultimate configuration and more efficient operations with permissive flashing yellow left turn movements. This project falls under STC’s on-call traffic engineering contract.
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services | Temecula, CA - Mr. Lambarth serves as Senior Project Engineer for task orders issued by the City, along with various other standalone traffic engineering design projects. As design engineer task manager for the HSIP Fiber Optic Communications System Upgrade Project, he leads design engineering task orders for utility coordination, preliminary and final engineering, specifications and estimates, bid assistance, as-builts, and QA/QC. He also served as senior project engineer for the Ynez and La Paz Traffic Signal Design Project and Murrieta Creek Bridge Project. Tasks led included a variety of civil plans, traffic signal design plans, signing and striping plans, lighting design, and preparation of traffic control plans.
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services | Menifee, CA - Serving as Senior Project Engineer, Mr. Lambarth is responsible for the development and delivery of task orders issued by the City, along with standalone traffic engineering design projects. Tasks completed to date include signing and striping, traffic signal modifications, median improvements, speed feedback signs, traffic control, construction support, and plan re view. He has been responsible for producing bid ready design packages for two traffic signal modifications and intersection improvements for Murrieta and Scott Road. This included specifications and estimates in accordance with the most recent Caltrans Standard Drawings.
SDCRAA, San Diego International Airport Support Facilitie s | San Diego, CA - Mr. Lambarth led specialized traffic engineering services for the multidisciplinary team that executed the Design -Build Services for the International Airport Support Facilities Project. He prepared PS&E for traffic signal modification plans, signage and striping plans, traffic control plans, and construction support services for proposed improvements along N. Harbor Drive, Admiral Boland Way, and Pacific Highway.
Years of Experience: 13
Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, Michigan State
University, East Lansing (2009)
License:
Professional Engineer (Civil) California, #86675
Professional Engineer (Traffic) California, #2927
Areas of Expertise:
Traffic Signal Design
Communications & ITS Design
Signing and Striping
Traffic Control
Traffic Calming
Traffic Impact Analysis
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
14 16498.00150\32126437.1
EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Charges/Payments
Consultant will invoice City on a monthly cycle. Consultant will include with each invoice a detailed progress report that indicates the amount of budget spent on each task. Consultant will inform City regarding any out-of-scope work being performed by Consultant. This is a time-and-materials contract.
DESCRIPTION
Principal in Charge,
President
Matt Brudin, PE, QSD
Project Manager,
Principal Engineer
Lori Askew
Project Engineer,
Engineer IV
Trent Brudin, PE
Design Engineer,
Engineer II
Katherine Hernandez
Sr. Principal Engineer
Erik Howard, PLS
2-Man Survey Crew
Senior Engineering
Associate
Craig Brudin
Engineering Associate I
Administrative Support
Administrative Assistant
II
ERSC SUBTOTAL
STK Architectue, Inc.
Inland Aerial Surveys,
Inc.
STC Traffic, Inc.
Potholing
SUBCONSULTANT
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
$285 $215 $165 $135 $240 $300 $175 $105 $85
2.00 36.00 12.00 - - 10,290.00 $ - $ -$ - $ 10,290.00 $ SUBTOTAL 570.00 $ 7,740.00 $ 1,980.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,290.00 $ -$ - $ - $ -$ 10,290.00 $ As-Built Research, Investigation & Review - 2.00 2.00 8.00 - 8.00 2,520.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,520.00 $ Utility Coordination, Research & Notification 1.00 2.00 2.00 16.00 2,175.00 $ - $ -$ 2,175.00 $ Survey & Mapping 1.00 2.00 4.00 16.00 36.00 24.00 64.00 26,645.00 $ 4,620.00 $ 4,620.00 $ 31,265.00 $ SUBTOTAL -$ 860.00 $ 990.00 $ 1,890.00 $ 3,840.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 6,720.00 $ 2,040.00 $ 31,340.00 $ 4,620.00 $ - $ - $ 4,620.00 $ 35,960.00 $
CONSTRUCTION PLAN PREPARATION
Street Improvement Plans 2.00 10.00 40.00 66.00 18,230.00 $ -$ 18,230.00 $ Signing & Striping Plans 4.00 540.00 $ 8,244.50 $ 8,244.50 $ 8,784.50 $ Traffic Signal Modification Plans 4.00 540.00 $ 19,305.00 $ 19,305.00 $ 19,845.00 $ Advertisement/Construction Support 8.00 24.00 8.00 6,760.00 $ 2,244.00 $ 2,244.00 $ 9,004.00 $ Fiber Optic Interconnect Plans -$ 8,244.50 $ 8,244.50 $ 8,244.50 $ SUBTOTAL 570.00 $ 3,870.00 $ 10,560.00 $ 11,070.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26,070.00 $ -$ 38,038.00 $ - $ 38,038.00 $ 64,108.00 $
COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN, UTILITY COORDINATION & POTHOLING Composite Utility Plan - 2.00 20.00 36.00 - 8,590.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,590.00 $ Potholing - 2 for TS Poles & 10 for Utility Locates 1.00 2.00 8.00 1,625.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 17,600.00 $ 19,250.00 $ 20,875.00 $ SUBTOTAL -$ 645.00 $ 3,630.00 $ 5,940.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,215.00 $ -$ 1,650.00 $ 17,600.00 $ 19,250.00 $ 29,465.00 $
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE & SPECIFICATIONS
Construction Cost Estimate & Specifications 1.00 4.00 40.00 24.00 10,985.00 $ - $ 4,059.00 $ - $ 4,059.00 $ 15,044.00 $ SUBTOTAL 285.00 $ 860.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 3,240.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,985.00 $ -$ 4,059.00 $ -$ 4,059.00 $ 15,044.00 $
RECORD DRAWINGS
Prepare Record Drawings 2.00 8.00 12.00 - 3,370.00 $ - $ 1,573.00 $ - $ 1,573.00 $ 4,943.00 $ SUBTOTAL -$ 430.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 1,620.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,370.00 $ -$ 1,573.00 $ - $ 1,573.00 $ 4,943.00 $ 500.00 $ -$ -$ - $ -$ 500.00 $ 92,770.00 $ 4,620.00 $ 45,320.00 $ 17,600.00 $ 67,540.00 $ 160,310.00 $ 160,310.00 $
DATA COLLECTION Task B
FEE SCHEDULE
City of Fontana
Design Services for Date Elementary School Street I mprovement Project SP-93-DE-23 TASK NO.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task A
Task C
Task D
Task E
PROJECT TOTAL/NOT - TO - EXCEED
Reimbursable Expenses (Repro, Plotting, Shipping, Mailing and Mileage) TOTALS
Task F
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. | Schedule of Rates Professional Staff
President ........................................................................... $285.00 Vice President ....................................................................$245.00 Sr. Principal Engineer ......................................................... $240.00 Principal Engineer ..............................................................$215.00 Assistant Principal Engineer .............................................. $200.00 Engineer V .........................................................................$180.00 Engineer IV ........................................................................$165.00 Engineer III ........................................................................ $150.00 Engineer II ......................................................................... $135.00 Engineer I .......................................................................... $120.00 Engineering Staff
Principal Engineering Associate .........................................$195.00 Senior Engineering Associate ............................................$175.00 Engineering Associate V .................................................... $155.00 Engineering Associate IV ................................................... $135.00 Engineering Associate III.................................................... $125.00 Engineering Associate II..................................................... $110.00 Engineering Associate I...................................................... $105.00 Engineering Aide II .............................................................. $60.00 Engineering Aide I ............................................................... $55.00 Survey Staff and Services
Principal Surveyor.............................................................. $200.00 Senior Surveyor .................................................................$165.00 Surveyor III ........................................................................ $130.00 Surveyor II ......................................................................... $115.00 Surveyor I .......................................................................... $100.00 2-Man Survey Crew (Std Equipment/Truck) ......................$300.00 1-Man Survey Crew (Std Equipment/Truck) ......................$235.00 3rd Man on Survey Crew ...................................................$130.00 Construction Support Staff
Construction Manager .......................................................$200.00 Chief Construction Inspector .............................................$155.00 Sr. Construction Inspector .................................................$145.00 Construction Inspector ......................................................$135.00 Inspector Overtime (Hours 8-12/Saturdays) ..................... $185.00 Inspector Overtime (Hours 12+/Sundays) .........................$220.00 Administrative Staff
Operations Manager ......................................................... $110.00 Operations Specialist ...........................................................$95.00 Administrative Assistant II ...................................................$85.00 Administrative Assistant I ....................................................$75.00 Other Direct Expenses
Vehicle Mileage ................................................ $0.70/Mile Subconsultant ...................................................Cost + 20% Reimbursable Expenses/Charges ..................... Cost + 15% Forensic Analysis ................................. Standard Rate X 2 Expert Witness .................................... Standard Rate X 3 NOTE: All rates hereon are subject to
automatic increase upon July 1st of each
year. Rates will be adjusted by the percent
increase in California Consumer Price Index-
All Urban Consumers for the twelve-month period
ending February as calculated by the California Department of Industrial Relations (CADIR) California Consumer Price Index Calculator. Prevailing Wage Rates are dictated by the CADIR.
All classifications which are subject to Prevailing Wages will be adjusted when revised determinations are published by the CADIR.
Unless otherwise established by contractual agreement,
payment is due and payable upon receipt. Payment is considered delinquent if not paid within 30 days of invoice date. If payment is not completed within agreed terms, Client agrees to pay a service charge on the amount past due at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum).
January 1, 2023
15 16498.00150\32126437.1
EXHIBIT C
Activity Schedule
Work Plan
Y ears of Service
Celebrating
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
Since 1996
Schedule
5 16
16498.00150\32126437.1
EXHIBIT D
Federal Requirements