NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
TO: X County Clerk, County of FROM: City of Fontana San Bernardino Department of Engineering
8353 Sierra Avenue
___ Office of Planning and Research Fontana, CA 92335
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title: Master Case No. 2 0-050, General Plan Amendment No. 20 -014, Zone Change No. 20 -014, Development Agreement No. 21-001, and Design Review No. 20-020.
State Clearinghouse Number: N/A
Name of Person or Agency carrying out project: Esmeralda Gomez – Associate Engineer, City of Fontana (Lead Agency) 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335.
Project Location: 16171 Slover Avenue, located in the vicinity of SE corner of Slover Avenue and Citrus Avenue, Fontana, CA, San Bernardino County (APN: 0255-011-36; previously known as APN’s 0255- 011-01, 0255-011-02, and 0255-01-03).
Project Description: Vacation of a public easement located in the vicinity of SE corner of Slover Avenue and Citrus Avenue that was a part of the project that included a development of an approximately 194,212 square foot warehouse building on approximately 8.75 -acres that was approved along with the adoption of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negated Declaration on March 16, 2021 by the Planning Commission of the City of Fontana.
Project Proponent & Address: Duke Realty Citrus & Slover LP, a Delaware limited partnership, 3546 Concours Street, Suite 100, Ontario, CA 91764.
Contact Name & Phone: Christian Conchrun - (562) 376-9239
This is to certify that on March 16, 20 21, the Planning Commission of the City of Fontana approved the above- described project along with the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration , and made the following determinations:
1. The project ____ will X will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously prepared and approved and fully analyzed the effects of the project. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration thoroughly analyzed and discussed all potential environmental impacts. None of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND have occurred. Additionally, this action doesnot include any addi tional impacts beyond those impacts already disclosed in the previous Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and no further environmental review is required.
3. Mitigation measures X were were not made a condition of the approval of the project.
4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations __ was X was not adopted for this project.
5. Findings X were were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
6. The location and custodian of the documents which comprise the record of proceedings for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration are specified as follows:
Custodian: City of Fontana, Department of Engineering
Location: 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335
____________________________
Ricardo Garay
Senior Engineer
Date Received for Filing