Agenda packet — Fontana City Council, July 14, 2026 (part 7 of 8)

with the surrounding area. The Project Site is physically suitable in size and shape to support the new retail shopping center which will be built in accordance with the zoning and fire codes, that will make for a safe, attractive, and well-designed Project.

Architectural relief utilized for the buildings will feature a smooth stucco coated exterior, varied roof line, metal elements, decorative lighting, and other features appropriate to the style. The use of a variety of colors and materials such as stucco finish and stone veneer further adds architectural diversity to each building. The Project enhances the surrounding neighborhood by incorporating architectural style that complements the surrounding area. The Project Site is suitable in size and shape to support the new retail shopping center which will be built in accordance with the FMC and will result in a safe, attractive, and welldesigned Project.

Finding No. 4. The site improvements are appropriate and will result in a safe, well-designed facility.

Findings of Fact: The development includes appropriate site improvements consisting of new landscaping, parking areas, sidewalks, drainage, perimeter walls lighting, and fencing all designed in compliance with the Zoning and Development Code.

Section 12. Approvals. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby finds that SPA No. 26-0001 substantially promotes the goals of the City’s General Plan and recommends that the City Council of the City of Fontana Adopt an ordinance approving SPA No. 26-0001 and a resolution approving CUP No.26-0001, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit A”, CUP No. 26-0002, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit B”, CUP No. 26-0003, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit C”, CUP No. 26-0011, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as “Exhibit D”, and Design Review No. 26-0002, subject to the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto as “Exhibit E” all of which are incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein, whereby the resolution will not become effective unless and until the accompanying ordinance is adopted.

Section 13. Resolution Regarding Custodian of Record: The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at the Planning Department, 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335.

This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6.

Section 14. Certification. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

Section 16. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect 165956
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 12 of 44 ends

other provisions or application of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Fontana, California, at a regular meeting held on this 16th day of June 2026.

City of Fontana
Joseph Armendarez, Chair
ATTEST:

I, Torrie Lozano, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Fontana, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote, to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Torrie Lozano, Secretary
166057
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 13 of 44 ends

Exhibit “A”

CITYOF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE: Master Case No. 26-0004
Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0001
Gas Station/Type 20 ABC License
DATE: June 16, 2026
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue (APN: 1107- 262-07 and -65)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of the final building plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

2. This Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void two (2) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, has commenced within this period.

3. The rights and privileges granted by this project shall not become effective, nor shall the Applicant commence the use for which this project is granted, until both of the following have occurred:
a. All of the improvements, construction, alteration and other work set forth in this project have been completed and have been accepted by the City, as evidenced by the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or other document evidencing the City’s final inspection and acceptance of the work; and
b. All other Conditions of Approval imposed by this project have been fulfilled.

4. This project will comply with all applicable provisions, regulations and development standards of the City of Fontana Municipal Code.

5. The occupants of this facility shall comply with applicable provisions of local, state and federal laws and regulations with respect to noise, vibration, smoke, odors, fire and explosive hazards, including, but not limited to the City’s adopted Hazardous Materials Management Plan and Industrial Wastewater/Discharge requirements.

6. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any and all actual or alleged claims, actions or 166158
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 14 of 44 ends

proceedings against the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, annul or seek monetary damages arising out of any challenge to the applicant’s proposed project or to any approvals of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning this project, including but not limited to actions challenging CEQA actions, permits, variances, plot plans, design plans, maps, licenses, and amendments. The City of Fontana shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City of Fontana shall cooperate in the defense.

In the event of any such third party action or proceeding, the City shall have the right to retain legal counsel. The applicant shall be responsible and reimburse the City for such legal fees and costs, in their entirety, including actual attorneys’ fees, which may be incurred by the City in defense of such action or proceeding. This indemnification shall also include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, the City and/or any parties bringing such forth.

Except as required under applicable State and Federal law, the City of Fontana and the applicant acknowledge that the City would not have approved this project if the City were to be liable to applicant in damages under or with respect to all or any part of this application or this condition of approval. Accordingly, applicant shall not sue the City for damages or monetary relief for any matter arising from or related to this condition of approval. Applicant’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be limited to declaratory/injunctive relief, mandate, and/or specific performance.

7. In the event that one or more of the Conditions of Approval for this project needs to be amended and/or deleted due to health, safety or welfare concerns, the City Manager is authorized to approve or conditionally approve such amendment/deletion, provided that City manager shall bring such proposed amendment/deletion to the City Council at the next available meeting for City Council ratification, but in no event later than sixty (60) days following the City Manger’s decision. The noticing of such City Council meeting for possible ratification shall be pursuant to Sections 30-30 and 30-31 of the Municipal Code.

8. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void two (2) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, has commenced within this period.

9. Exterior lighting compatible with the design of the building shall be provided for the parking lot.

The lighting shall be directed and shielded so as to illuminate only the parking area and to avoid glare impacts on adjacent properties.

10. All roof-mounted equipment and ground mounted equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and streets with colors and materials that are compatible with the architecture of the building(s).

11. The applicant/developer shall comply with the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

12. The applicant shall have fully provided, constructed, or otherwise meet all Planning Department’s requirements per approved plans, and shall have addressed all punch list items to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
166259
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 15 of 44 ends

13. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on a sheet in the final building or grading plans prior to issuance of any building or grading permits.

14. Applicant shall pay all applicable service fees pursuant to the City of Fontana Municipal Code.

15.The operation of the business shall not violate any federal, state, or local laws or ordinances, including the rules, regulations and orders of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Department and conditions of this Conditional Use Permit. Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute grounds for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.

16.All tobacco products shall remain under the control of the management, behind the cashier’s counter.

17.If licensed premise operates twenty-four (24) hours a day, the business owner/licensee shall keep all beer and wine within a lockable, permanently affixed cooler, lockable permanently affixed display case, or under the control of the management behind the cashier’s counter. The coolers and display cases shall be locked during the hours of 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. daily. Additionally, no alcoholic beverages shall be sold during the hours of 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. daily.

18.Employees engaged in the sale distribution of alcoholic beverages shall be at least 18 years of age. If the business owner, licensee, or management choose to employ a salesperson between the ages of 18 to 20, that salesperson must be under the continuous supervision of at least one salesperson who is 21 years old or older.

19.The sale of malt liquor or fortified wine products with an alcoholic content greater than 17 percent by volume is prohibited.

20.The licensee shall not sell single bottles of wine in less than 750 milliliters containers. Specialty or dessert wines packaged in 375 milliliter bottles or more shall be permitted.

21.The sale of beer or malt beverages in single size containers less than 40 ounces is prohibited.

22.The licensed premise shall not sell individual units of beer or wine from the manufacturer’s multiunit packages. (Two- Packs, Three-packs, four-packs, six-packs, etc.)

23.The licensee shall not allocate more than half of the cooler doors for the sale of alcoholic beverages. All designated coolers for alcoholic beverages shall be located furthest away from the entrance doors. Any display or storage of alcoholic beverages on the public floor area of the convenience store is prohibited. All alcoholic beverages shall be displayed in coolers, or on shelving units. All alcoholic beverages shall be stored within a storage room, only accessible to employees.

24.The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the licensed premises.

25.In the event that adult merchandise (books, magazines, videos, and CDs) is offered for sale, all such merchandise shall be kept under the control of the management behind the cashier’s 166360
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 16 of 44 ends

counter and must be segregated from other reading material and screened from the view of minors.

26.On a regular and reasonable basis, litter shall be removed daily from the premises, including adjacent public sidewalks, and all parking areas under the control of the business owner/licensee. These areas shall be swept or cleaned, either mechanically or manually, on a weekly basis to control debris.

27.The business owner/licensee shall comply with the City False Alarm Ordinance. Excessive false alarms will require replacement of the alarm system prior to the extension of any conditional use permit.

28.Graffiti abatement by the business owner/licensee, or management shall be immediate and ongoing on the premises, but in no event shall graffiti be allowed unabated on the premises for more than 48 hours. Abatement shall take the form or removal or shall be covered/painted over with a color reasonably matching the color of the existing building, structure, or other surface being abated. Additionally, the business owner/licensee, or management shall notify the City within 24 hours (at 909-350-GONE) of any graffiti elsewhere on the property not under the business owner/licensee’s or management control so that it may be abated by the property owner and/or the City’s Graffiti Team.

29.The business owner/licensee or management shall prevent on-site loitering. The management shall regularly police the area under its control to prevent the loitering of persons about the premises.

30.Sales of alcoholic beverages will be restricted to, and within the confines of, the building portion of the licensed premises.

31.A digital video surveillance system is required at the premise. It is recommended to be an internet-based system and shall be maintained in proper working order at all times. The surveillance video/visual media shall be maintained for a minimum of sixty (60) days and upon request, shall be accessible to law enforcement personnel for viewing, copying and collection purposes during regular business hours.

32.Signs shall comply with all City of Fontana sign requirements. No more than 25% of the total window area and clear doors shall bear advertising or signs of any sort. Window signs shall be placed and maintained in a manner so that there is a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises from the public sidewalk or entrance to the premises (this applies to all windows of this location).

33.The exterior of the premise, including all entrances, walkways, adjacent public sidewalks, alleyways, and parking lots under the control of the licensee, shall be illuminated at a minimum of one (1) foot candle of light during all hours of darkness, so that persons standing in those areas at night are identifiable by law enforcement personnel. All luminaries utilized are required to have vandal resistant light fixtures.

34.A prominent, permanent sign or signs stating, “NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES” shall be posted on the building and shall be clearly visible to patrons of the licensee. The size, format, placement, and languages of the sign or signs shall be determined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Generally, the signs should be 24 inches length and 14 inches in width with the print of sufficient size to make them clearly readable. 166461
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 17 of 44 ends

35.A prominent, permanent sign or signs stating, “NO OPEN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTAINERS ARE ALLOWED ON THE PREMISES” shall be posted on the building and shall be clearly visible to patrons of the licensee. The size, format, placement, and languages of the sign or signs shall be determined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Generally, the signs should be 24 inches length and 14 inches in width with the print of sufficient size to make them clearly readable.

36.No electronic arcade or amusement games are permitted on the licensed premises at any time.

37.In the event security problems occur, the Police Department (Chief of Police) will issue a letter to the owner requesting a meeting to discuss said security problems. If security problems are not resolved by owner in the timeframe mutually agreed upon in said meeting, at the discretion of the Chief of Police, the business owner/licensee or management, at his or her own expense, shall provide a California licensed, uniformed security guard(s) on the premises, during such guards shall comply with Fontana City Code section 22-62, and shall be registered with the State of California’s Bureau of Security and Investigative Services as a security guard prior to employment within the City of Fontana.

38.The licensee shall attend a L.E.A.D. training (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs provided by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control) or a responsible beverage service training (RBS) from a provider listed on the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control’s website, within six (6) months, and any employee engaged in the sale of alcohol shall attend the LEAD or RBS training within 90 days of employment.

39.The approved set of Conditions of Approval, and the ABC license shall be posted at all times at a visible location behind the cashier’s counter in the facility and shall remain legible at all times.

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE HAZMAT DEPARTMENT

40. Any business or facility that handles hazardous materials in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time or generates any amount of hazardous waste shall obtain hazardous material permits from this department. Prior to occupancy the business operator shall apply for permits (Hazardous Material Permit, Hazardous Waste Permit, Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, Underground Storage Tank Permit) or apply for exemption from permitting requirements.

41. Application for one or more of these permits shall occur by submitting a hazardous materials business plan using the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/

42. Businesses or facilities handling greater than 1320 gallons of petroleum products in aboveground storage tanks (shell capacity) shall prepare and implement a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) in accordance with 40 CFR 1 112.3 and CHSC 25270.4.5(a). The SPCC plan shall be submitted via the CERS system and maintained on site.

43. Underground storage tank (UST) systems storing hazardous substances in the County of San Bernardino shall conform to standards issued by the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District. Written approval shall be obtained from this Department prior to the installation of any new UST system(s) and/or modifications to an existing UST system. Prior to installation, plans 166562
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 18 of 44 ends

for underground storage tank systems shall be reviewed and approved by Office of the Fire Marshal, Hazardous Materials Division. For additional information please contact (909) 386- 8401.
166663
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 19 of 44 ends

Exhibit “B”

CITYOF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE: Master Case No. 26-0004
Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0002
DATE: June 16, 2026
Grocery Store Type 21 and Type 86 ABC License
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue (APN:
1107-262-07 and -65)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of final buildings plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any and all actual or alleged claims, actions or proceedings against the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, annul or seek monetary damages arising out of any challenge to the applicant’s proposed project or to any approvals of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning this project, including but not limited to actions challenging CEQA actions, permits, variances, plot plans, design plans, maps, licenses, and amendments. The City of Fontana shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City of Fontana shall cooperate in the defense.

In the event of any such third-party action or proceeding, the City shall have the right to retain its own separate legal counsel to defend the interests of the City. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursing the City for such legal fees and costs, in their entirety, including actual attorneys’ fees, which may be incurred by the City in defense of such action or proceeding. This indemnification shall also include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, the City and/or any parties bringing such forth.

The City of Fontana and the applicant acknowledge that the City would not have approved this project if the City were to be liable to applicant in damages under or with respect to all or any part of this application or this condition of approval. Accordingly, applicant shall not sue the City for damages or monetary relief for any matter arising from or related to this 166764
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 20 of 44 ends

condition of approval. Applicant’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be limited to declaratory/injunctive relief, mandate, and/or specific performance.

3. The rights and privileges granted by this project shall not become effective, nor shall the Applicant commence the use for which this project is granted, until all of the following have occurred:
a. All requirements of the Fontana Municipal Code shall be complied with. b. All Conditions of Approval imposed on this project have been fulfilled.

4. In the event that one or more of the Conditions of Approval for this project needs to be amended and/or deleted due to health, safety or welfare concerns, the City Manager is authorized to approve or conditionally approve such amendment/deletion, provided that City Manager shall bring such proposed amendment/deletion to the City Council at the next available meeting for City Council ratification, but in no event later than sixty (60) days following the City Manager’s decision. The noticing of such City Council meeting for possible ratification shall be pursuant to Sections 30-30 and 30-31 of the Municipal Code.

5. At any time, the Director of Planning may bring a status report to the Planning Commission identifying impacts or failure to comply with conditions resulting from the Conditional Use Permit approval. Such status report may contain a police report regarding calls for service at the location. Nothing herein shall modify or limit the City’s authority to regulate the business or modify or revoke the permit upon the City’s determination that the business is being operated in a manner adverse to the public’s health, safety, and welfare.

6. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void two (2) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, has commenced within this period.

7. In addition to sign identifying the business, no sign shall be placed in or upon the window of any structure utilized for commercial purposes in the upper or lower one third of the total transparent area of any window. Window signage shall be limited to 25 percent of the total window and clear door area. Window signs shall be placed and maintained in a manner so that there is a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises from the adjacent sidewalk or entrance to the premises.

8. The operation of the business shall not violate any federal, state, or local laws or ordinances, including the rules, regulations and orders of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Department and all conditions of the City of Fontana’s Conditional Use Permit. Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute grounds for revocation of a conditional use permit.

9. All tobacco products shall remain under the control of the management, behind the cashier’s counter.

10.Employees engaged in the sale or distribution of alcoholic beverages shall be at least 18 years of age. If the business owner, licensee, or management choose to employ a 166865
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 21 of 44 ends

salesperson between the ages of 18 to 20, that salesperson must be under the continuous supervision of at least one salesperson who is 21 years old or older.

11.No beer, wine or distilled spirits shall be displayed within five feet of the front door or between the register and the front door unless it is under the control of the management within locked shelving units.

12.No display or sale of beer, wine or distilled spirits, shall be made from an ice tub.

13.No alcoholic beverages shall be stored, sold or displayed (even for special events) within any aisle-way of the main sales floor or vestibule.

14.The sale of malt liquor or fortified wine products with an alcoholic content greater than 17 percent by volume is prohibited.

15.The licensee shall not sell single bottles of wine in less than 750 ml. containers. Specialty or dessert wines which are only packaged in 375 milliliter bottles shall be permitted.

16.No distilled spirits shall be sold in bottles or containers smaller than 375 ml.

17.The sale of beer or malt beverages in single size containers of 40 ounces or less is prohibited.

18.The licensed premise shall not sell individual units of beer or wine from the manufacturer’s multi-unit packages (three-packs, four-packs, six-packs, etc.).

19.The licensee shall not allocate more than half of the cooler doors for the sale of alcoholic beverages. All designated coolers for alcoholic beverages shall be located furthest away from the entrance doors.

20.The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the licensed premises.

21.On a regular and reasonable basis litter shall be removed daily from the premises, including adjacent public sidewalks and all parking areas under the control of the business owner/licensee. These areas shall be swept or cleaned, either mechanically or manually, on a weekly basis to control debris.

22.The business owner/licensee shall comply with the City False Alarm Ordinances.

23.Graffiti abatement by the business owner/licensee shall be immediate and ongoing on the licensed premises, but in no event shall graffiti be allowed unabated on the premises for more than 48 hours. Abatement shall take the form of removal or shall be covered/painted over with a color reasonably matching the color of the existing building, structure, or other surface being abated. Additionally, the business owner/licensee shall notify the City within 24 hours (at 909.350-GONE) of any graffiti elsewhere on the property not under the business owner/licensee’s control so that it may be abated by the property owner and/or the City’s Graffiti Enforcement Team.

24.The management and employees of the licensed premise shall be required to prevent loitering in the parking lot of the site. The management and employees of the licensed premise shall regularly police the area under its control to prevent the loitering of persons 166966
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 22 of 44 ends

about the premises.

25.Sales of alcoholic beverages will be restricted to, and within the confines of, the building portion of the licensed premises.

26.A digital video surveillance system is required at the premise. It is recommended to be an internet-based system and shall be maintained in proper working order at all times. The surveillance video/visual media shall be maintained for a minimum of sixty (60) days and upon request, shall be accessible to law enforcement personnel for viewing, copying and collection purposes during regular business hours.

27.Signs shall comply with all City of Fontana sign requirements. No more than 25% of the total window area and clear doors shall bear advertising, signs or obstructions of any sort.

Window signs or other obstructions shall be placed and maintained in a manner so that there is a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises from the public sidewalk or entrance to the premises (this applies to all windows and glass doors of this location).

28.The exterior of the premise, including all entrances, walkways, adjacent public sidewalks, alleyways and parking lots under the control of the licensee, shall be illuminated at a minimum of one (1) foot candle of light during all hours of darkness, so that persons standing in those areas at night are identifiable by law enforcement personnel. All luminaries utilized are required to have vandal resistant light fixtures.

29.The exterior of the licensed premises, including adjacent public sidewalks and all parking lots under the control of the licensee, shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness, at all entrances, sidewalks or parking surfaces, at a minimum of one foot candle of light.

30.A prominent, permanent sign or signs stating “NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES” shall be posted on the front of the building or in the front windows of the business, and shall be clearly visible to patrons of the licensee. The size, format, placement, and languages of the sign or signs shall be determined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Generally, the signs should be 24 inches in length and 14 inches in width with the print of sufficient size to make them clearly readable.

31.A prominent, permanent sign or signs stating “NO OPEN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTAINERS ARE ALLOWED ON THE PREMISES” shall be posted on the front of the building or in the front windows of the business, and shall be clearly visible to patrons of the licensee. The size, format, placement and languages of the sign or signs shall be determined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Generally, the signs should be 24 inches in length and 14 inches in width with the print of sufficient size to make them clearly readable.

32.No electronic arcade or amusement games are permitted on the licensed premises at any time.

33.In the event security problems occur, the Police Department (Chief of Police) will issue a letter to the owner requesting a meeting to discuss said security problems. If security problems are not resolved by the owner in the timeframe mutually agreed upon in said meeting, at the discretion of the Chief of Police, the business owner/licensee or management, at his or her own expense, shall provide a California licensed, uniformed security guard(s) on the premises, during such hours as requested and directed by the Police Department. All uniformed security guards shall comply with Fontana City Code 167067
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 23 of 44 ends

section 22-62, and shall be registered with the State of California’s Bureau of Security and Investigative Services as a security guard prior to employment within the City of Fontana.

34.Responsible Beverage Service Training: All persons engaged in the sale or service of alcohol shall abide by the following requirements. If compliance with Item B (AB 1221 of 2017) is achieved, the requirement for Item A is void.

35.The licensee, business owner, all managers and employees engaged in the sale of alcohol, shall attend a L.E.A.D. training (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs provided by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control) or an alternative responsible beverage service training (RBS), within 90 days of employment.

36.Comply with California Assembly Bill 1221 of 2017, Responsible Beverage Service Training Act. Details can be found on the website for the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

37.The approved set of Conditions of Approval, and the ABC license shall be posted at all times at a visible location behind the cashier’s counter in the facility and shall remain legible at all times.

38.At all times during an instructional tasting event, the instructional tasting event area shall be separated from the remainder of the off-sale licensed premises by a rope, cable, cord, or other barrier.

39.The license holder shall display signage prohibiting persons under 21 years of age from entering the instructional tasting event area.

40.No charge of any sort shall be made for tastings at instructional tasting events within the establishment.

41.A person under 21 years of age shall not serve, or be served, wine, beer, or distilled spirits at instructional tasting events within the establishment.

42.The instructional tasting events shall only take place between the hours of 10 am and 9pm, seven (7) days a week.

43.There shall be no on-sale retail sales to consumers attending the instructional tasting events within the establishment.

44.The license holder shall not permit any consumer to leave the instructional tasting area with an open container of alcohol.

45.An instructional tasting event shall be limited to a single type of alcoholic beverage. “Type of alcoholic beverage” means distilled spirits, wine, or beer.

46.A single tasting of distilled spirits shall not exceed one-fourth of one ounce and a single tasting of wine shall not exceed one ounce. No more than three tastings of distilled spirits or wine shall be provided to any person on any day. The tasting of beer is limited to eight ounces of beer per day. The wine, beer, or distilled spirits tasted shall be limited to the products that are authorized to be sold by the holder of the Type 86 license under its requisite off-sale license.
167168
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 24 of 44 ends

47.All tastes shall be served by an employee or the designated representative of the “authorized licensee” over the age of 21 years old.

48.Any unused wine, beer, or distilled spirits remaining from the tasting shall be removed from the off-sale license licensed premises by the “authorized licensee” or its designated representative.
167269
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 25 of 44 ends

Exhibit “C”

CITYOF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE: Master Case No. 26-0004
Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0003
DATE: June 16, 2026
Drive through (Pad A Building)
LOCATION: Southwest of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue (APN: 1107- 262-07 and -65)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of final buildings plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

Page 26 of 44 ends

condition of approval. Applicant’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be limited to declaratory/injunctive relief, mandate, and/or specific performance.

7. The project shall incorporate graffiti resistant materials. The property owner shall at all times maintain an adequate amount of paint, matching the project, and shall abate any graffiti at the project within 48 hours of appearance of such graffiti.

8. All landscaping shall be healthy and maintained in a reasonable manner as determined by the Director of the Planning Department or his/her designee.

9. All signs shall be reviewed under a separate Design Review Sign application.

10.Operation of the drive-thru shall not result in stacking of vehicles on the public streets at any time.

11.Operation of the drive-thru shall not result in stacking of vehicles in such a manner that would result in obstruction to any access aisle of parking spaces for other tenants in the retail center, or the main drive aisles for the retail center.

12.The landlord shall stipulate in the lease for the tenant using the drive-thru land that should conflicts occur between vehicles parking and/or circulating in the parking areas and vehicles queuing for the drive-thru, staff of the drive-thru operation shall provide traffic control, take orders ahead of the menu boards, and/or utilize all require methods to eliminate those 167471
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 27 of 44 ends

conflicts.

13.The drive-through operation shall adhere to the approved traffic queuing study in the event that cars stack up outside of the designated drive-through lane.

14.The drive-through operation shall comply with the Special Use Regulations in Chapter 30 of the Municipal Code.
167572
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 28 of 44 ends

Exhibit “D”

CITYOF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE: Master Case No. 26-0004
Conditional Use Permit No. 26-00011
DATE: June 16, 2026
Drive-Through (Shops C Building)
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue (APN:
1107-262-07 and -65)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of final buildings plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

Page 29 of 44 ends

condition of approval. Applicant’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be limited to declaratory/injunctive relief, mandate, and/or specific performance.

5. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void two (2) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, has commenced within this period.

6. The project shall incorporate graffiti resistant materials. The property owner shall at all times maintain an adequate amount of paint, matching the project, and shall abate any graffiti at the project within 48 hours of appearance of such graffiti.

7. All landscaping shall be healthy and maintained in a reasonable manner as determined by the Director of the Planning Department or his/her designee.

8. All signs shall be reviewed under a separate Design Review Sign application.

9. Operation of the drive-thru shall not result in stacking of vehicles on the public streets at any time.

10.Operation of the drive-thru shall not result in stacking of vehicles in such a manner that would result in obstruction to any access aisle of parking spaces for other tenants in the retail center, or the main drive aisles for the retail center.

11.The landlord shall stipulate in the lease for the tenant using the drive-thru land that should conflicts occur between vehicles parking and/or circulating in the parking areas and vehicles queuing for the drive-thru, staff of the drive-thru operation shall provide traffic control, take orders ahead of the menu boards, and/or utilize all require methods to eliminate those conflicts.

12.The drive-through operation shall adhere to the approved traffic queuing study in the event that cars stack up outside of the designated drive-through lane.

13.The drive-through operation shall comply with the Special Use Regulations in Chapter 30 of the Municipal Code.
167774
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 30 of 44 ends

Exhibit “E”

CITYOF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE: Master Case No. 26-0004
Design Review No. 26-0002
DATE: June 16, 2026
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue (APN:
1107-262-07 and -65)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of final buildings plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

2. The rights and privileges granted by this project shall not become effective, nor shall the Applicant commence the use for which this project is granted, until both of the following have occurred.
a. This project will comply with all applicable provisions, regulations and development standards of the Fontana City Code.
b. All of the improvements, construction, alteration and other work set forth in this project have been completed and have been accepted by the City, as evidenced by the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or other document evidencing the City’s final inspection and acceptance of the work; and, c. All other Conditions of Approval imposed by this project have been fulfilled.

3. Prior to the construction of any modifications, all structural and aesthetic changes to the project design must be requested and approved in writing by the Director of Planning or his/her designee. Major structural and aesthetic changes exceeding the codified parameters of administrative policy shall be presented to the Planning Commission for approval. Changes made without approval as stated herein, will prevent the occupancy of the subject structure until corrections are approved in writing by all appropriate staff.

4. The project shall comply with all applicable provisions, regulations and development standards of the City of Fontana Municipal Code.
167875
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 31 of 44 ends

5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any and all actual or alleged claims, actions or proceedings against the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, annul or seek monetary damages arising out of any challenge to the applicant’s proposed project or to any approvals of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning this project, including but not limited to actions challenging CEQA actions, permits, variances, plot plans, design plans, maps, licenses, and amendments. The City of Fontana shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City of Fontana shall cooperate in the defense.

6. In the event that one or more of the Conditions of Approval for this project needs to be amended and/or deleted due to health, safety or welfare concerns, the City Manager is authorized to approve or conditionally approve such amendment/deletion, provided that City Manager shall bring such proposed amendment/deletion to the City Council at the next available meeting for City Council ratification, but in no event later than sixty (60) days following the City Manager’s decision. The noticing of such City Council meeting for possible ratification shall be pursuant to Section No. 30-30 of the Municipal Code.

7. Color combinations and color schemes shall not be modified or changed without prior approval from the original approving body by a revision to the original application. Minor hue color changes may be approved by the Director of Planning. The Director of Planning shall have the authority to refer minor hue color changes to the Planning Commission for consideration under a revision to the original application if deemed necessary. Appeals shall follow provisions of the Municipal Code.

8. Foam treatment used for architecture features and/or projections located on the first floor (under 14 feet) shall be covered with concrete or similar durable material a minimum of ¼ inch thick, or as determined by the Director of Planning.

9. Graffiti and unauthorized markings on any wall, sign, or structure must be removed within twenty-four (24) hours.

10.All landscaping must be adequately maintained at all times. 167976
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 32 of 44 ends

11.All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions shall be placed on a sheet in the final building or grading plans prior to issuance of any building or grading permits.

12.The construction contractor shall use the following source controls at all times:
a. Construction shall be limited to 7:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm on Saturdays, and no construction on Sundays and Holidays unless it is approved by the building inspector for cases that are considered urgently necessary as defined in Section 18-63(b7) of the Municipal Code. b. For all noise-producing equipment, use types and models that have the lowest horsepower and the lowest noise generating potential practical for their intended use.
c. The construction contractor will ensure that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, is properly operating (tuned-up) and lubricated, and that mufflers are working adequately.
d. Have only necessary equipment onsite.
e. Use manually adjustable or ambient-sensitive backup alarms. When working adjacent to residential use(s), the construction contractor will also use the following path controls, except where not physically feasible, when necessary:
f. Temporarily enclose localized and stationary noise sources. g. Store and maintain equipment, building materials, and waste materials as far as practical from as many sensitive receivers as practical.

13.The applicant shall post a publicly visible sign on the project site with the telephone number and 24-hour point of contact for dust, noise and construction complaints. The 24-hour point of contact shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and have authority to commit additional assets to control dust, or respond to construction complaints after hours, on weekends and holidays. Construction shall be limited to 7:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm on Saturdays, and no construction on Sundays and holidays.

14.Historical Archaeological Resources
a. Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant. If the resources are Native American in origin, interested Tribes (as a result of correspondence with area Tribes) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes.

Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation takes place. b. Preservation in place shall be the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavation to remove the resource along the subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All Tribal Cultural Resources shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be 168077
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 33 of 44 ends

offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.
c. Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects shall be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken.

Principal personnel shall meet the Secretary of the Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified.

15.The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).

16.The applicant/developer shall install a full height freestanding block wall along the freeway side of the project site of any developed areas. The block wall shall be constructed per the approved fence and wall plan.

17.Adhere to the City standard of one foot candle minimum for all entrances, exits, pedestrian paths, parking lots, and activity areas. Reflect all light fixtures on the site plan. All areas shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness and all luminaries utilized shall be vandalresistant fixtures. The type of lighting shall be fluorescent, white L.E.D.s or metal halide.

18.Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant. If the resources are Native American in origin, interested Tribes (as a result of correspondence with area Tribes) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources.

Typically, the Tribe will request preservation in place of recovery for educational purposes.

Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation takes place.

Preservation in place shall be the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavation to remove the resource along the subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All Tribal Cultural Resources shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, is such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects shall be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel shall me the Secretary of the Interior Standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern 168178
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 34 of 44 ends

California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

19.Development fees and Planning Department final inspection fee must be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy.

20.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall underground all utilities, which for the purpose of this condition shall include all boxes, structures and/or other equipment located in the public rights-of-way, any public utility easement(s), and on any private property, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.

BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT

21.The applicant shall design the project to show compliance with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. City of Fontana Ordinance
i. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations.

22.This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with most current edition of the Fire Code and California Building Code including all local ordinances and standards.

23.The applicant shall verify that any temporary building, trailer, commercial coach, etc. installed and/or used in connection with a construction project complies with FMC Chapter 5 Article XIV.

24.The applicant shall verify that all perimeter/boundary walls are designed and constructed so that the outer/exterior face of the wall is as close as possible to the lot line. In any case, the outer/exterior face of the wall shall be within two (2) inches of the lot line. Distances greater than two (2) inches may be approved prior to construction by the Building Official on a case by case basis for extenuating circumstances.

25.The applicant shall verify that all lot lines, easement lines, etc. will be located and/or relocated in such a manner as to not cause any existing structure to become nonconforming with the requirements of the latest adopted edition of the Building Code, or any other applicable law, ordinance, or code.

26.The applicant shall have the tract or parcel map recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
168279
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 35 of 44 ends

27.The applicant shall comply with the following grading requirements:
a. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by Building & Safety. The grading plans shall indicate all site improvements and shall indicate complete drainage paths of all drainage water run-offs.
b. All drainage water shall drain via approved methods to an approved location, such as a public street, a public drainage system, etc. c. Drainage water shall not cross over a public sidewalk. Drainage water may, however, cross under a sidewalk if an approved drainage structure is used. d. A recorded drainage acceptance agreement is required from adjoining property(s) receiving flows from this property.
e. No water course or natural drainage shall be obstructed. f. Minimum slope or grade for ALL drainage structures shall be one half (0.50) percent for concrete and one (1.0) percent for all other, or as otherwise approved by the Building Official.
g. Drainage water shall not pass from an ‘improved’ type of drainage structure to an ‘unimproved’ type of drainage structure (e.g., concrete swale to a dirt swale) unless otherwise approved by the Building Official.
h. A complete hydrology study using the latest edition of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Hydrology Manual, and complete hydraulic calculations justifying the size, slope, capacity, etc. of any and all drainage structures being utilized, shall be submitted to and approved by Building & Safety.

The on-site drainage system shall, as a minimum, be designed to handle the run-off generated by a ten (10) year storm. Check for flooding of all on-site structures (buildings) and all adjacent properties during a hundred (100) year storm.
i. The grading plans shall, as a minimum, contain sections at all lot lines and/or permit boundary lines. These sections shall clearly indicate:
i. The relationship between the proposed finished on-site grade elevations and the existing adjacent property grade elevations (Indicate any additional drainage water that may come from an adjacent property.); and
ii. The ground cover/finished surface material being proposed (e.g., type of pavement, plant material, etc.); and
iii. All proposed drainage structures; and
iv. Any proposed and/or required walls or fencing

28.The applicant is required to obtain permits for the removal and/or demolition of structures.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

29.The following items (as applicable) shall be completed by the applicant and submitted to Building & Safety prior to the issuance of building permits for this project:
a. Precise grading plans shall be approved
b. Rough grading completed
c. Compaction certification
d. Pad elevation certification
e. Rough grade inspection signed off by a City Building Inspector

30.When the entitlement review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance 168380
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 36 of 44 ends

with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards.

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

31.The Project shall be served by the City’s sanitary sewer system, all sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the City Standards. Main trunk sewer line shall be in accordance with master sanitary sewer plan or as approved by the City Engineer.

Onsite sewer shall be privately maintained.

32.The Applicant shall obtain design and plan approval from all utility providers having jurisdiction over the on-site and off-site utilities. Completion of all undergrounding of on-site and off-site utilities is required by Section 27-52 of the City Municipal Code and in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer.

33.The Applicant shall maintain all improvements and utilities within the public right-ofway, including street sweeping, prior to issuance of final certificate of occupancy by the City.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS

34.The Applicant shall obtain approval of the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) for the entire project. Approval of the PWQMP shall occur prior to submitting the Final Water Quality Management Plan.

35.The Applicant shall obtain approval of the Preliminary Drainage Study for the entire project. Approval of the Preliminary Drainage Study shall occur prior to submitting the Final Drainage Study.

36.The Applicant shall submit engineered Rough Grading Plans and obtain full approval.

Rough Grading Plans shall conform to the California Building Code, the California Residential Code, Fontana Municipal Code, and Fontana Standard Plans and Specifications.

37.The Applicant shall submit engineered Precise Grading Plans and obtain full approval.

Precise Grading Plans shall conform to the California Building Code, the California Residential Code, Fontana Municipal Code, and Fontana Standard Plans and Specifications. Rough Grading Pad Certification is required to be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to precise grading permit issuance.

38.The Applicant shall prepare and obtain approval for a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the County of San Bernardino Technical Guidance Document and the most current template. All outstanding comments from the Preliminary WQMP must be resolved and incorporated into the Final WQMP.

39.The Applicant shall submit and obtain approval for a Final Drainage Study and comprehensive hydraulic analysis prepared in accordance with the County of San Bernardino Hydrology Manual and the City of Fontana Master Plan of Drainage. This study must resolve all outstanding comments from the preliminary report and evaluate both the project site and all affected off-site improvements.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS

40.Address conditions of approval for PC Resolution No. 2026-003 as required and record 168481
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 37 of 44 ends

Tentative Parcel Map No. 25-0012 (TPM 21013).

41.The Applicant shall submit a Community Facility District (CFD) maintenance map that meets Engineering requirements for size and format as required for the development showing the CFD boundary and maintenance requirements, obtain approval of the map and complete the first public hearing for formation of the CFD. If a CFD is not created, the project ownership shall be responsible for maintenance of all perimeter landscaping for Planning Area 4 by Property Management Association, Maintenance Agreement, or other approved association by the City.

42.As required by the City Engineer or City Traffic Engineer, dedicate an easement for traffic signal equipment at the main John Previti Avenue vehicular entrance.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OTHER CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

43.The Applicant shall record All map’s, lot line adjustments, right-of-way dedications, easements, reciprocal access agreement as required for the development.

44.The Applicant shall submit and obtain full approval of engineered improvement plans.

Engineered improvement plans include, but are not limited to, all required public improvements, including but not limited to streets, storm drainage systems, sewers, traffic signals, streetlights, striping, signs, landscape, and any required traffic control and/or detour plans. For a full list of traffic requirements, refer to the Traffic Division’s conditions of approval. All plans shall conform to City Standards and Specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

45.The Applicant/Engineer of Record shall submit a conforming copy of the recorded Memorandum of Agreement for the Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Water Best Management Practice transfer. The Access, Maintenance, and the WQMP Certification for BMP Completion must be submitted to the City Project Engineer.

46.The applicant shall construct all street, streetlight, traffic signal, signing and striping, and storm drain improvements on Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue along the project frontage in accordance with the Ventana Specific Plan and project plans. The John Previti Avenue connection to Lytle Creek Road shall be open to traffic.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

47.Complete all public improvements required of the project. Underground utilities required of the project. Ensure streetlights are energized and operating properly.

48.The Applicant/Engineer to provide the City of Fontana with As Built/Record Drawings for all public improvement plans. The Applicant/Developer shall provide a copy of the streetlight electric bill.

49.Slurry seal roads affected by the development as directed by the inspector. Slurry seal limits may extend past the project frontage to address existing striping/pavement markings that conflict with new striping/pavement markings, repair trenches, and other areas as determined by the inspector.

50.The Surveyor of Record shall provide centerline ties to the City of Fontana reflecting proper setting of all survey monuments within the project limits and replace any existing 168582
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 38 of 44 ends

survey monuments damaged or removed during construction.

51.The Surveyor of Record shall set survey monuments as required by the map and corner records must be recorded with the County. The Surveyor of Record shall notify the City in writing that monuments have been set in accordance with the recorded subdivision map and he/she has been paid in full for doing so.

52.All sewers shall be video inspected by applicant/contractor. Sewer video shall include clean-out connection, clean-out to lateral segment, lateral, and main line. Contractor performing the video inspection must have a NASSCO PACP, LACP, and MACP certification. Applicant shall provide a copy of the video on DVD or flash drive to inspection staff with an accompanying full report. Videos to be inspected and approved by City Inspector. If removal and replacement of any utility is required, a subsequent video of the repair will be required.

53.All storm drains shall be video inspected by applicant/contractor. Storm drain video shall include main lines and laterals. Applicant shall provide a copy of the video on DVD or flash drive to inspection staff. Videos to be inspected and approved by City Inspector. If removal and replacement of any utility is required, a subsequent video of the repair will be required.

54.The Engineer of Record shall submit a Final Grade Certification to the City Project Engineer for each building that a Certificate of Occupancy is being requested.

ENGINEERING – TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT

55.Project ingress and egress locations and restrictions shall be as follows, with additional or lesser restrictions being necessitated subject to changes in the site plan and approval of the City Engineer:
a. The Project may have a single ingress/egress point along Duncan Canyon Road that shall be designed, constructed, and signed to restrict ingress to right-turn inbound movements only and to restrict egress to right-turn outbound movements only.
b. The Project may have up to two ingress/egress points along John Previti Avenue. The northernmost access point may allow for full access (i.e., left- and right-turning inbound and outbound) movements. The southernmost access point shall be designed, constructed, and signed to restrict ingress to right-turn inbound movements only and to restrict egress to right-turn outbound movements only. The ingress and egress restrictions at the southernmost access point shall be reinforced with appropriate signage and pavement markings. The southernmost access point shall be designed, constructed, and signed to permit passenger vehicle ingress/egress only. c. Should emergency vehicle access to the public Right-of-Way be required or provided, such access points shall be designed and constructed to permit emergency vehicle ingress/egress only. Regular ingress/egress shall not be permitted at emergency vehicle access points.

56.Left-turn ingress and/or egress at all access locations may be restricted in the future due to traffic operational or safety concerns. Alternatives to such restrictions may be considered, subject to approval of the City Engineer.
168683
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 39 of 44 ends

57.Pedestrian access shall be provided between the residential parcel to the south and the commercial parcel via a pedestrian paseo as identified in the Pedestrian Circulation Plan of the Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan Amendment (July 26, 2022).

58.Intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance must be shown to meet the required standards both horizontally and vertically at all ingress/egress locations including consideration for walls, landscaping, grading, and vegetation. Sight distances shall comply with current AASHTO requirements.

59.The site plan shall identify the on-site vehicular traffic flow patterns and circulation, onsite signing and striping, and any restricted, reserved, or other pre-designated parking areas.

60.The location of bicycle parking shall be depicted on the site plan. The number of bicycle parking spaces shall be determined in compliance with the City of Fontana Zoning and Development Code. Bicycle parking shall comply with the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals’ (APBP) bicycle parking design guidance. In the event that the Fontana Zoning and Development Code and the APBP guidance differ, the Fontana Zoning and Development Code requirements shall prevail.

61.The site plan shall identify all pedestrian access ways and traffic crossings. Crossings shall be clearly marked, lighted, and identified throughout the interior of the project.

Pedestrian walkways shall have sufficient pathway lighting.

62.The site plan shall identify the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant path(s) of travel to/from the public right of way and from all ADA accessible parking spaces.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

63.The Applicant shall submit and obtain full approval of street improvement plans for all roadway improvements within the following extents, including such distance as required to tie-in to existing conditions:
a. Duncan Canyon Road between the I-15 Freeway Northbound Off-Ramp and John Previti Avenue
b. John Previti Avenue between Duncan Canyon Road and Lytle Creek Road

64.The Applicant shall submit and obtain full approval of signing and striping plans for all roadway improvements within the following extents, including such distance as required to tie-in to existing conditions:
a. Duncan Canyon Road between the I-15 Freeway Northbound Off-Ramp and John Previti Avenue
b. John Previti Avenue between Duncan Canyon Road and Lytle Creek Road

65.The Applicant shall design a raised and landscaped median along John Previti Avenue across the full length of the Project’s frontage and extending 100 feet south of the southern Project boundary, except as necessary to accommodate the ingress and egress movements described in Condition 55B.

66.If Project construction or design impacts the location of traffic signal poles or other traffic signal equipment in the public right-of-way in such a manner that the equipment requires relocation, the Applicant shall provide signal modification plans, and shall be responsible for all necessary improvements associated with the modifications at the 168784
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 40 of 44 ends

subject intersection.

67.The Project shall design and obtain full approval of a new traffic signal at the intersection of John Previti Avenue and the Commercial Driveway-Planning Area 3 Driveway.
a. The intersection and traffic signal shall be designed to accommodate at minimum the following lane configurations:
i. Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane
ii. Southbound: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane
iii. Eastbound: One shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane iv. Westbound: One shared left-/through/right-turn lane b. The intersection may be required to accommodate additional or reduced lane configuration, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. c. The length of each turn lane shall be of sufficient length to accommodate at minimum the vehicular queues identified in the Project’s traffic analysis (“Ventana Master Plan (MCN26-0004) Focused Traffic Assessment,” Urban Crossroads, Inc., March 31, 2026), subject to the approval of the City Engineer. d. The traffic signal shall be designed to provide sufficient line of sight for the northbound and southbound left-turn maneuvers from John Previti Avenue. If sufficient line of sight cannot be provided, the signal shall be designed to provide protected only left-turn phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches; otherwise, the signal shall be designed to provide protectivepermissive left-turn phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches. e. The eastbound approach shall be restricted to no right-turn maneuvers on red signal indications (No Right-Turn On Red) due to insufficient line of sight from the Project’s Commercial Driveway along John Previti Avenue. f. The project shall design the related signal fiber interconnect to connect this signal to the City’s Traffic Management Center (TMC).

68.The Project shall design and obtain full approval of signing and striping modifications and traffic signal modifications at the intersection of John Previti Avenue and Duncan Canyon Road.
a. The intersection and traffic signal shall be designed to accommodate at minimum the following lane configurations:
i. Northbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, one (1) through lane, and one (1) right-turn lane
ii. Southbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, two (2) through lanes, and one (1) right-turn lane
iii. Eastbound: one (1) left-turn lane, two (2) through lanes, and one (1) rightturn lane iv. Westbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, three (3) through lanes, and one (1) right-turn lane

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

69.The Applicant shall construct all street improvements with the following extents, including such distance as required to tie-in to existing conditions. a. Duncan Canyon Road between the I-15 Freeway Northbound Off-Ramp and John Previti Avenue
b. John Previti Avenue between Duncan Canyon Road and Lytle Creek Road 168885
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 41 of 44 ends

70.The applicant shall construct a raised and landscaped median along John Previti Avenue across the full length of the Project’s frontage and extending 100 feet south of the southern Project boundary, except as necessary to accommodate the ingress and egress movements described in Condition 55B.

71.John Previti Avenue between Duncan Canyon Road and Lytle Creek Road shall be fully constructed and opened for public access prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.

72.If Project construction or design impacts the location of traffic signal poles or other traffic signal equipment in the public right-of-way in such a manner that the equipment requires relocation the Applicant shall construct any necessary signal modifications, and shall be responsible for all necessary improvements associated with the modifications at the subject intersection.

73.The Applicant shall prepare and file queue management plans with the City which outlines the planned operation and management for all drive-through queues. The City may require changes to the queue management plans in the future due to traffic operational or safety concerns.
a. Any future change in tenant or land use that may alter demand or queuing characteristics, as determined by the City Engineer, shall require preparation of an updated drive-through queuing study and/or revisions to the queue management plan prior to Occupancy.

74.The Project shall construct a new traffic signal at the intersection of John Previti Avenue and the Commercial Driveway-Planning Area 3 Driveway. The signal shall be operational prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. a. The intersection and traffic signal shall be constructed to accommodate at minimum the following lane configurations:
i. Northbound: One left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane
ii. Southbound: One left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane
iii. Eastbound: One shared left-turn/through lane and one right turn lane iv. Westbound: One shared left-/through/right-turn lane b. The intersection may be required to accommodate additional or reduced lane configuration, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. c. The length of each turn lane shall be of sufficient length to accommodate at minimum the vehicular queues identified in the Project’s traffic analysis (“Ventana Master Plan (MCN26-0004) Focused Traffic Assessment,” Urban Crossroads, Inc., March 31, 2026), subject to the approval of the City Engineer. d. The traffic signal shall be constructed to provide sufficient line of sight for the northbound and southbound left-turn maneuvers from John Previti Avenue. If sufficient line of sight cannot be provided, the signal shall be constructed to provide protected only left-turn phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches; otherwise, the signal shall be constructed to provide protectivepermissive left-turn phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches. e. The eastbound approach shall be restricted to no right-turn maneuvers on red traffic signal indications (No Right-Turn On Red) due to insufficient line of sight from the Project’s Commercial Driveway along John Previti Avenue. f. The project shall construct the related signal fiber interconnect to connect this 168986
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 42 of 44 ends

signal to the City’s Traffic Management Center (TMC).

75.The Project shall construct the signing and striping modifications and traffic signal modifications at the intersection of John Previti Avenue and Duncan Canyon Road.

The signing and striping and signal modifications shall be installed and operational prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.
a. The intersection and traffic signal shall be designed to accommodate at minimum the following lane configurations:
i. Northbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, one (1) through lane, and one (1) right-turn lane
ii. Southbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, two (2) through lanes, and one (1) right-turn lane
iii. Eastbound: one (1) left-turn lane, two (2) through lanes, and one (1) rightturn lane iv. Westbound: two (2) left-turn lanes, three (3) through lanes, and one (1) right-turn lane

76.The Project shall design and construct the signal modifications needed at the intersection of Citrus Avenue and Duncan Canyon Road to implement an eastbound right-turn overlap phase, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Type 15 or larger poles shall be required for any five-section signal heads. The overlap phase shall be operational prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.

FIRE DEPARTMENT

77.Jurisdiction: The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the Fontana fire Protection District (herein “Fire Department”). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current California Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances, and standards of the Fire Department.

78.Fire Access Road Width: Prior to map recordation, all fire access roadways shall be designed to meet the requirements for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty-six (26) foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-1.

79.Turnaround: An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12% grade and have a minimum of nineteen (19) foot inside radius and forty-five (45) foot outside radius for all turns. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-1.

80.Fire Lanes: The applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for review and approval of all proposed signage and striping for all fire access roadways. All curbs adjacent to fire lanes shall be painted red and “No Parking, Fire Lane” signs shall be installed on public and private roads in accordance with approved standards. SBCoFD Standard A-2.

81.Water System Commercial: All water supply systems shall be designed to meet the 169087
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 43 of 44 ends

required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department.

The required fire flow shall be determined by using Appendix BB of the California Fire Code. A minimum of one new six (6) inch fire hydrant assembly with two (2) two and one half (2 1/2) inch and one (1) four (4) inch outlet (4”x2.5”x2.5”) shall be provided.

All fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart as measured along vehicular travel-ways. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard W-2. The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 3,250 GPM for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow is based on a 57,185 Square Foot structure.

82.Hydrant Marking: Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire Department. SBCoFD Standard W-2.

83.Water Improvement Plan: The applicant shall submit “Water Improvement Plans” to Fontana Fire Prevention. W.I.P. to include site plan, existing & proposed PUBLIC fire hydrant locations, building construction type, square foot details of the largest building, total square foot of ALL floors in a multifloored building, square foot size of entire site, and description of what is being constructed/occupancy type. Once approved by Fire Department, applicant will provide stamped/approved W.I.P to water purveyor for their construction needs. ON-SITE PRIVATE FIRE WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE

INSPECTED AND IN WORKING CONDITION PRIOR TO PLACING COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS ON THE JOBSITE. California Fire Code Chapter 5.

84.Combustible Protection: Prior to combustibles being placed on the project site an approved paved roadway providing fire access and fire hydrants providing an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. California Fire Code Chapter 5.

85.Fire Sprinkler-NFPA #13: An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA 13 and Fire Department standards is required. A fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The plans shall include hydraulic calculations and manufacturer specification sheets. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9 & SBCoFD Standard F-1.

86.Fire Sprinkler-NFPA #13D: An automatic life safety fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA 13D and Fire Department standards is required. A fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans with hydraulic calculations and manufacturer specification sheets to the Fire Department for approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9 & SBCoFD Standard F-2.

87.Hood and Duct Extinguishing system: An automatic hood and duct fire extinguishing system is required. A licensed contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans (minimum 1/8” scale) with manufactures’ specification sheets to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

California Fire Code Chapter 9, NFPA 17A, & NFPA 96.

88.Fire Alarm, Manual or Automatic: A manual, automatic or manual and automatic fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA 72 and all applicable codes is required. A fire alarm contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the 169188
Resolution No. PC 2026-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4

Page 44 of 44 ends

time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9, SBCFD Standard F-5, & NFPA

72. 89.Fire Extinguishers: Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire Department. California Fire Code Chapter 9.

90.Commercial Addressing: Commercial, industrial, and multi-family developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum eight (8) inches in height and with a one (1) inch stroke.

The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.

California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard B-1

91.Key Box: An approved Fire Department key box is required. The key box shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-4

92.Security Gates: In commercial, industrial, and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department override switch is required.

California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-3

93.Material Identification Placards: The applicant shall install, in all locations deemed appropriate by the Fire Department, approved material identification placards on the outside of all buildings and/or storage tanks that store hazardous or flammable materials. Additional placards shall be required inside the buildings when chemicals are segregated into separate areas. California Fire Code Chapter 50 & NFPA 704.

94.High-Piled Storage: The applicant shall submit an application for a High-Piled Storage permit for storage of over 12’ in height of Class I-IV commodities and/or over 6’ in height of high hazard commodities. Three (3) sets of detailed plans and a commodity analysis report shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. The applicant shall submit to the Fire Department concurrently with any racking permits to the Building and Safety division. California Fire Code Chapter 32 & SBCoFD Standard S-1.

95.Secondary Access: The development shall have a minimum of two points of vehicular access during each phase of construction for fire and emergency access purposes and for evacuation routes. SBCoFD Standard A-1

96.San Bernardino County Fire Standards/Codes: Items not directly called out on these Conditions of Approval, shall also adhere to currently adopted San Bernardino County Fire Standards, California Fire Code, & NFPA.
169289
Ventana
at Duncan Canyon
Revised May 2026
Prepared For:

Prepared By:

The Previti Group
SWA Group
Architects Orange
Fuscoe Engineering
The City of Fontana
Specific Plan Amendment
169390
53 Development Standards
Walls and Fences:

1. All perimeter walls and fences shall be
designed to be consistent with The Ventana
at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan Design
Guidelines set forth herein.

2. Freestanding walls and fences constructed
on interior lot lines, or at the rear of the
required landscape setback area shall not
exceed eight feet (8’) in height.

3. Combined retaining walls and wall(s) and
fence(s) shall not exceed a combined total
height of sixteen feet (16’) as measured
from the future adjoining grade. Combined
retaining walls and wall(s) and fence(s)
that exceed eight feet (8’) in height shall
be constructed with a decorative block or
finish, or screened with landscape.

4. These height limitations may be exceeded
with the approval of an administrative
variance.

5. All trash and storage areas shall be screened
with a decorative block wall that consists of
split-face or slump-stone block, or a stucco
finish.

6. All types of barbed or razor wire are
prohibited. Chain link fencing is only allowed
as a temporary use during construction for
security purposes.

7. All service, trash and storage areas shall be
screened from view from public streets by
walls and approved fencing.

Lighting:

1. Lighting fixtures shall be properly shielded
to prevent off-site glare. Spot fixtures shall
be directed downward and/or upward, but
not outward from the project area.

2. Lighting is required to accent buildings,
monumentation and specimen trees within
this Planning Area.

Accessory Structures:

1. Accessory structures located in private
patio areas, including, but not limited to
spas, patio trellis and covers, permanent
barbecues, remote garages, carports
and storage buildings shall adhere to the
requirements defined in the Fontana Zoning
Code and California Building Code.

5.4 Planning Area 4
Planning Area 4 is adjacent to the Interstate
15 Freeway and has excellent visibility from
the Freeway in both directions. Additionally,
Planning Area 4 is located at the community’s
entry along Duncan Canyon Road. The MixedUse designation is intended to create a unique, village scale, pedestrian-oriented core.

Planning Area 4 contains approximately 25 net
acres and would allow up to 104,000 square feet
of commercial and office uses, and up to 600
residential units. It is located adjacent to the
major entry into the Specific Plan project area
from the 15 Freeway. It consists of a Tuscaninspired commercial center focused around a large “Piazza” surrounded by residential
and commercial buildings. A tall “campanile”
tower feature would be attached to one of
the buildings on the Piazza which will serve
as a significant visual monument from the
surrounding area.

The net maximum residential density is 24 units
per acre. Units could be for-sale or for-rent and
consist of studios to four bedroom dwelling
units. The intent is to allow the flexibility to
offer a range of housing types that appeal to a
range of market segments, including singles,
young couples, families and seniors. Flexibility
is provided in the development regulations to
allow a variety of densities while maintaining
the overall limit on the total number of allowed
dwelling units.

The streets would be private and maintained
through a Homeowners Association or similar
entity. This area should have approximately 6.3
acres of open space and contain a recreation
center, swimming pool, a tot lot and other
village amenities.
169491
54 Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan Amendment

5.4.1 Permitted Uses
Land Use: Mixed-Use
Principal Permitted Uses:

1. Vertically Mixed Uses that include Retail
Commercial, Office Professional and
Residential

2. Attached Condominiums and Townhomes

3. Multi-family Attached Residential

4. Sit Down Restaurants

5. Offices, Corporate and Professional Services

6. Grocery Store/Specialty Market

7. Hotels

8. Fast Food Restaurants

9. Food Courts

10. Retail Shops

11. Kiosk and Small Cart Retail

12. Arcades with Video Games

13. Book Stores

14. Art Galleries and Auctions associated with
the Art Gallery Use

15. Sports Clubs, Gyms and Athletic Facilities

16. Music and Vocational Instruction

17. Salons and Spas

18. Any other use not specifically identified as
a conditionally permitted or prohibited use,
deemed compatible with other permitted
uses by the Director of Planning.

Accessory Permitted Uses:

1. Utility Facilities

2. Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs)

3. Kiosk and Small Cart Retail

4. Parking Structures

5. Construction Trailers and Containers
(Temporary)

6. Leasing Office

7. Private Recreation Facilities

8. Recreation Centers

9. Swimming Pools

10. Tot Lots

11. Spas

12. Court Games (Basketball, Volleyball,
Handball, etc)

13. Other accessory uses as determined by
the Director of Planning to be substantially
compatible with principal permitted uses.

Conditionally Permitted Uses:

1. Restaurants and Cafes with Entertainment
and/or Dancing (Alcoholic beverages
allowed)

2. Night Clubs (Alcoholic beverages allowed)

3. Winery and Micro-brewery (Alcoholic
beverages allowed)

4. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities that
are fully integrated into the architecture of
structures, as a stealth facility

5. Gas Stations

6. Only two (2) Drive-Throughs associated with
any kind of use are allowed in Planning Area

4. Application of the Drive-Through must
comply with the Special Use Regulations in
Chapter 30 of the Municipal Code.

7. Other conditionally permitted uses as
determined by the Director of Planning to
be substantially compatible with principal
permitted uses
Prohibited Uses:

1. Car Washes

2. Storage Facilities

3. Gas Stations

4. Free-standing Drive-through Fast Food and
Coffee Shops

5. Auctions not associated with a permitted
use

6. New and Used Automobile Sales

7. Pawn Shops

8. Tattoo Parlors

9. Freestanding Wireless Facilities that are not
camouflaged or fully integrated into the
architecture of structures

10. Any other uses not specifically identified
as a principal, accessory, or conditionally
permitted use, and uses deemed
incompatible by the Director of Planning

5.4.2 Development Standards
Commercial Floor Area Ratio Maximum:
1 FAR
Maximum Residential Density:
24 Dwelling Units per Acre
Revised May 2026 169592
55 Development Standards
Minimum Building and Parking Setbacks*:

Min. Building & Parking
Setbacks Building Parking
Setback from Duncan
Canyon Rd. Twenty Feet (20’) Ten Feet (10’)
Setback from Lytle Creek
Rd. Ten Feet (10’) Ten Feet (10’)
Setback from Interstate 15 Twenty Feet (20’) Five Feet (5’) Setback from Adjacent
Commercial Use Twenty Feet (20’) Five Feet (5’)
* From Right-of-way.

Maximum Building Height:

1. Buildings and other structures shall not
exceed sixty-five feet (65’) in height.

2. Tower features, architectural features,
chimneys, and other architectural
projections may exceed the maximum
building height, up to seventy-five feet (75’).

Features exceeding seventy-five feet (75’)
shall be subject to the approval through
Fontana’s Design Review Application
process set forth in Chapter 30, Article II,
Division 11, Subdivision I of the Fontana
Zoning Code.

Residential Unit Size Requirements:

1. Minimum Unit Size: 550 square feet

2. Minimum Number of Bedrooms: Studio

3. Unit Mix shall be within the following:

Unit Type Percentage Mix
Studio 10% Max
1-bedroom 60% Max
2-bedrooms or more 40% Min
Residential Lot Requirements:

1. Minimum Lot Size: 1,000 square feet

2. Minimum Lot Width: 21 feet

3. Minimum Lot Depth: 45 feet

4. Maximum Lot Coverage: 100%
Recreational Amenities:

1. Developments consisting of 50 to 79 units
shall provide a minimum of four of the
following recreational facilities:
• Enhanced Public Realm with Dedicated
Pedestrian Circulation Network of
Paseos and Plazas
• Indoor Gym/Fitness Facility
• Tot-lot with Multiple Activities
• Pool and Spa, with Cabana Building
(Restrooms/Showers)
• BBQ Area and Picnic Benches

2. Developments consisting of 80 to 200 units
shall provide all of the recreational amenities
listed above

3. For each 100 units above the first 200 units,
another recreational amenity as described
below, or equivalent, shall be provided.
• Community Multi-Purpose Room
equipped with Kitchen, Restrooms and
Shower
• Fire Feature with Seating Area
• Community Picnic Area
• Lap Pool
• Off-leash Dog Park
• Community Garden
• Additional BBQ Areas and Picnic
Benches
• Court facility (e.g. Bocce, Tennis,
Volleyball, Basketball, etc.)

4. Other recreational facilities not listed above
may be considered subject to the Planning
Commission review and approval.

5. Related recreational activities may be
grouped together and located at any one
area of the common open space.

Minimum Open Space:

1. Private Open Space: A minimum of fifty (50)
square feet of open space shall be provided
for each dwelling unit. The minimum
dimension shall be six feet (6’) in any
direction. Private open space may include
ground floor patios or courtyards, second
and third floor balconies or decks, and
rooftop decks. Private open space may be
covered, but must be open on at least one
169693
56 Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan Amendment
side.

2. Common Open Space: A minimum of twentyfive percent (25%) shall be provided for common open space. Common open space
may include all areas that are not building
footprints, trash/waste enclosures, parking
or drive aisles. Enclosed common amenities/
areas (recreational buildings, lounge and
business center, etc.) may be included in
the common open space calculation.

Parking and Circulation:

1. 1.8 spaces per unit of which one space shall
be covered. Spaces can be provided as onstreet parking so long as the total number of spaces can be included entirely within the
planning area.

2. Parking for retail commercial and dining
areas totaling over 20,000 square feet of
gross leasable area within a planning area
shall provide parking at a rate of 1 space per
200 square feet of gross leasable area.

3. Except as specified herein, parking within
the Specific Plan project area is required per
Zoning and Development Code Article XI,
Division 2., Table 30-314.A.

4. For Uses not specified in the Specific Plan
or the Zoning Code, the Director of Planning
shall establish the required number of
spaces based upon standards for similar
uses

5. The Director of Planning shall have the
authority to grant the joint use of parking
facilities for two or more uses. Joint, or
reciprocal use of parking facilities may
only occur when the uses/parties sharing
the parking demonstrate that there is not
a significant overlap in demand, and that
the total number of spaces are sufficient
to meet the peak parking demand of any
combination of simultaneous uses.

6. Driveway aisle widths are required per the
Zoning and Development Code Article IX,
Division 2, Section 30-221, Table 30-221.A.

7. Minimum size parking stalls for open and
covered parking are nine feet (9’) by eighteen
feet (18’).

Landscaping:

1. Required setback areas shall be landscaped
with trees shrubs, plants, grasses and
hardscape as recommended within The
Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan
Design Guidelines and Plant Palette.

2. All areas shall have a minimum of fifteenpercent (15%) landscaping of the net project site, minus the building area footprint.

Walls and Fences:

1. All perimeter walls and fences shall be
designed to be consistent with The Ventana
at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan Design
Guidelines set forth herein.

2. Freestanding walls and fences constructed
on interior lot lines, or at the rear of the
required landscape setback area shall not
exceed eight feet (8’) in height. Sound walls
adjacent to the I-15 Freeway right-of-way
may exceed this height limit.

4. These height limitations may be exceeded
with the approval of an administrative
variance.

5. All trash and storage areas shall be screened
with a decorative block wall that consists of
split-face or slump-stone block, or a stucco
finish.

6. All types of barbed or razor wire are
prohibited. Chain link fencing is only allowed
as a temporary use during construction for
security purposes.

7. All service, trash and storage areas shall be
screened from view from public streets by
walls and approved fencing.
169794
57 Development Standards

5.5 Planning Area 5
Planning Area 5 is located adjacent to the
Interstate 15 Freeway and has excellent
visibility from the Freeway from both directions.

Planning Area 5 is currently owned by two
separate entities and have sub-designations of
5A and 5B based on this ownership. Each subplanning area may be developed independently.

Planning Area 5A contains approximately 2.4
net acres and would allow up to 60,000 square
feet of office and commercial development.

Planning Area 5B contains approximately 4.8
net acres and would allow up to 32,500 square
feet of office and commercial development.

Alternatively, Planning Areas 5A and 5B may
be developed as a joint venture. Should this
occur, the approximately 7.2 net acre site would
allow up to 92,500 square feet of office and
commercial development.

Other related uses that may be allowed in these
areas include Research and Development, Light
Manufacturing/High Tech Assembly, Retail and
similar uses.

5.5.1 Permitted Uses
Land Use: Commercial
Principal Permitted Uses:

1. Offices, Corporate and Professional Services

2. Hotel

3. Sit-down Restaurants

4. Banks and Savings and Loan Institutions

5. Credit Unions

6. Fast Food Restaurants

7. Research and Development

8. Light Manufacturing*

9. High Tech Assembly*

10. Food Courts

11. Retail Shops

12. Sports Clubs, Gyms and Athletic Facilities

13. Salons and Spas
Lighting:

1. Lighting fixtures shall be properly shielded
to prevent off-site glare. Spot fixtures shall
be directed downward and/or upward, but
not outward from the project area.

2. Lighting is required on the tower features,
as accents on buildings, on monumentation,
and on specimen trees within this planning
area.

3. Unique lighting is encouraged within, and
radiating out from the Piazza.

Accessory Structures:

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
TO: ☐ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
or
X County Clerk Address:
222 W Hospitality Lane 1
st Floor,
San Bernardino, CA 92415
FROM: Public Agency/Lead Agency Name:

City of Fontana
Address:
8353 Sierra Ave, Fontana CA 92335
Contact: Alexia Barberena
Phone: (909) 350-6568
Email: [email protected]
TO: X Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation
State Clearinghouse
1400 Tenth Street, Rm. 113
Sacramento, CA 95814
Lead Agency (if different from above)
Address:

Contact:

Phone:

SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.

State Clearinghouse Number
(If submitted to SCH):
2021100400
Project Title: Master Case No. 26-0004; Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0002, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0003, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0011 and Design Review No. 26-0002
Project Applicant (include address, telephone number and email address):

Stephen King, Senior Project Manager, The Previti Group, 2151 E. Convention Center Way, Suite 114, Ontario, CA 91764, (909) 354-8092, [email protected]
Specific Project Location – Identify street address and cross street or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 ½’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name):

Located on the southwest corner of Duncan Canyon Road and John Previti Avenue General Project Location (City and/or County): City of Fontana, County: San Bernardino Project Description: Master Case No. 26-0004, Specific Plan Amendment No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit No. 25-0001, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0002, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0003 Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0011 and Design Review No. 26-0002, a request to add two usesto Planning Area 4 of the Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan specifically adding gas stations and drive-through uses as conditionally permitted uses;
169996
Notice of Determination
ATTACHMENTNO.6
Clerk’s File Stamp:
request to establish a gas station and , request to establish an ABC Type 20 license for a proposed convenience store as part of the gas station; request to establish an ABC Type 21 and Type 86 License for a proposed grocery store, request to establish two drive-through uses, and request for site and architectural review of the development of a new retail shopping center and the associated site improvements on 11.55 acres located on property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 1107-262-07 and -65.

Identify the person or entity undertaking the project, including any private applicant, any other person undertaking an activity that receives financial assistance from the Public Agency as part of the project, and any person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the project.

Stephen King, Senior Project Manager, The Previti Group, 2151 E. Convention Center Way, Suite 114, Ontario, CA 91764, (909) 354-8092, [email protected]
This is to advise that the (☒ Lead Agency or ☐ Responsible Agency) has approved the above described project on June 16, 2026 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project:

1. The project [ ☐ will ☒ will not] have a significant effect on the environment.

2. ☒ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164, an addendum to the Ventana Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2021100400) has been prepared for this proposed project. The aforementioned EIR was adopted by the City Council on September 13, 2022.
☐ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.
☐ A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

3. ☐ Mitigation measures[☒ were ☐ were not ]made a condition of the approval of the project.

4. ☐ A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Plan [☒ was ☐ was not] adopted for this project.

5. ☐ A Statement of Overriding Considerations[ ☐ was ☒ was not] adopted for this project.

6. ☐ Findings[ ☒ were ☐ were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

This is to certify that the Final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval, or the Negative Declaration, is available to General Public at:

Custodian: Location:

Date: Patty Nevins
Director of Planning
170097
Notice of Determination
ATTACHMENTNO.6
Authority cited: Sections 21083, Public Resources Code.

Reference Section 21000-21174, Public Resources Code.
170198
ATTACHMENT NO. 7

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SI DESEA INFORMACION EN ESPAÑOL REFERENTE A ESTA NOTIFICACION O PROYECTO, FAVOR DE COMUNICARSE AL (909) 350-6728.

In compliance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof, the Agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Should you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Department by calling (909) 350-7602. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FONTANA FOR THE FOLLOWING:

Master Case (MCN) No. 26-0004, Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 26-0002, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 26-0003, Design Review (DRP) No. 26-0002
A Specific Plan Amendment request to amend Planning Area 4 of the Ventana Specific Plan to allow for gas stations and drive-throughs as Conditionally Permitted Uses, a Conditional use permit request to establish a new gas station use, a Conditional Use Permit request to establish an Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 21(General, Off-Sale) and Type 86 (Sampling) licenses for a proposed grocery store, a Conditional Use Permit request to establish an Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 20 (Beer & Wine, Off-Sale) license for a proposed convenience store, and a Design Review request to approve the site and architectural design of an approximately 98,783 square foot retail shopping center and associated site improvements on 11.55 acres.

Environmental
Determination:

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164, an Addendum to the Ventana at Duncan Canyon Specific Plan FEIR (SCH No. 2021100400) was prepared. Staff has determined that the adopted FEIR addressed issues of potential concern of the proposed development based on CEQA sections 15162 and 15164 and the City of Fontana's 2019 Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Based on this evaluation it was determined an Addendum was the appropriate document for this Project. Additionally, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred and as a result, an Addendum to the Ventana Specific Plan Final EIR (SCH No. 2021100400) was prepared.

Location of
Property:
170299
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
South of Duncan Canyon Road and west of
John Previti Avenue (APN: 1107-262-07 and
-65)
Date of Hearing: June 16, 2026
Place of Hearing: Steelworkers Auditorium
8437 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Time of Hearing: 6:00 P.M.

Should you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Alexia Barberena, at (909) 350-6568. Email: [email protected]

ANY INTERESTED PARTY MAY PROVIDE INFORMATION BY LETTER OR EMAIL WHICH MAY BE OF ASSISTANCE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. A COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNER LISTED ABOVE.

IF YOU CHALLENGE IN COURT ANY ACTION TAKEN CONCERNING A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, YOU MAY

BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC

HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.

Publish date: 5/27/2026
1703 100
June 16, 2026 PC Minutes
1704
ATTACHMENT NO. 5

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SI DESEA INFORMACION EN ESPAÑOL REFERENTE A ESTA NOTIFICACION O PROYECTO, FAVOR DE COMUNICARSE AL (909) 350-6728.

A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FONTANA FOR THE FOLLOWING:

Master Case (MCN) No. 26-0004, Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 26-0001, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 26-0002, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 26-0003, Conditional Use Permit No. 26-0011, and Design Review (DRP) No. 26-0002 A request to amend the text to Planning Area 4 of the Ventana Specific Plan to add gas stations and drivethroughs as conditionally permitted uses; a request to establish a gas station as a conditionally permitted use within the retail shopping center project, and request to establish an Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 20 (Beer & Wine, Off-Sale) license for the proposed convenience store as part of the gas station; a request to establish an Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 21 License (General, Off-Sale), and Type 86 ABC License (Sampling) for a proposed grocery store; a request to establish a drive-through use for a standalone building within the proposed retail shopping center; a request to establish a drive-through use for a suite as part of a multi-tenant building within the proposed retail shopping center; and a request for site and architectural approval for the development of a new commercial shopping center and associated site improvements on 11.55 acres.

Environmental
Determination:

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162
and 15164, an Addendum to the Ventana at
Duncan Canyon Specific Plan FEIR (SCH No.
2021100400) was prepared. Staff has
determined that the adopted FEIR addressed
issues of potential concern of the proposed
development based on CEQA sections 15162
and 15164 and the City of Fontana's 2019 Local
Guidelines for Implementing CEQA. Based on
this evaluation it was determined an Addendum
was the appropriate document for this Project.

Additionally, none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 have occurred and as a result,
an Addendum to the Ventana Specific Plan
Final EIR (SCH No. 2021100400) was
prepared.

Location of
Property: South of Duncan Canyon Road and west of
John Previti Avenue (APN: 1107-262-07 and
-65)
1705
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
Date of Hearing: July 14, 2026
Place of Hearing: Steelworkers’ Auditorium
8437 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Time of Hearing: 2:00 P.M.

Should you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Cecily Session-Goins, at (909) 350-6723.

E-mail: [email protected].

ANY INTERESTED PARTY MAY PROVIDE INFORMATION BY LETTER OR EMAIL WHICH MAY BE OF ASSISTANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. A COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNER LISTED ABOVE.

IF YOU CHALLENGE IN COURT ANY ACTION TAKEN CONCERNING A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, YOU MAY

BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC

HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.

Publish date: July 3, 2026
1/8 Page
1706
1 Maria Torres
From: Planning
Subject: FW: Ventana Public Comment
From: HOLMES BASSETTE
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 6:52 PM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Ventana Public Comment

CAUTION - EXTERNAL SENDER - THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE CITY'S EMAIL SYSTEM Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Ventana development agenda item July 7, 2026.

I'd like to recommend that gas stations be limited to one or less since gas stations are available at the exits north and south of Duncan Canyon. I'd suggest a charging station for electric vehicles.

Also, please consider that this is an upscale neighborhood and amenities should be consistent with that condition.

It also appears that the graders being used do not have legible EINs as required by the state.

Thank you for your time.
sincerely,
Holmes Bassette
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
1707
City of Fontana
Action Report
City Council Meeting
8437 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
File #: 26-1017 Agenda Date: 7/14/2026
Agenda #: C. Category: Public Hearing
FROM:

Engineering
SUBJECT:

Adopt Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Updated Development Impact Fees RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2026-078, adopting a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, the findings contained therein, and revising the amount of Development Impact Fees to finance certain public facilities and taking certain other actions related thereto.

COUNCIL GOALS:
· To practice sound fiscal management by living within our means while investing in the future. · To invest in the City’s infrastructure (streets, sewers, parks, etc.) by providing for the development of new infrastructure.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Fontana recently completed a comprehensive Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) update for public facilities, police facilities, fire facilities, library facilities, park facilities, landscape medians, local arterials, active transportation, traffic signals, storm drain, and sewer systems. The CIP has been requested for the City Council’s approval separately and it will continue to be updated annually.

Based on these significant and ongoing updates, staff retained David Taussig and Associates (DTA) to prepare an impact fee nexus study (“Study”) which analyzed and provided recommendations of potential modifications to the City’s Development Impact Fee Schedule (“DIF”). The Study was prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 1600 and the requirements of AB 602.

As part of the Study, DTA evaluated the City’s needs across multiple infrastructure and service categories. These evaluations were based on service levels identified by the respective City departments as necessary to support future development.

DTA utilized a range of data, assumptions, and planning documents in its analysis, including existing City facilities, property and equipment valuations, the current funded Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and identified unfunded CIP needs to calculate the maximum justifiable fee for each DIF category. The Study also considered anticipated infrastructure, equipment, and capital investments required to accommodate future growth, as well as relevant master plans for sewer and storm drain systems and the City’s most recent General Plan.

In addition to the specific recommendation noted below, as described in the Study, affected residential fees have been updated to a calculation based on the square footage of the homes, rather than a fixed “per unit” cost in compliance with AB 602. Storm drain fees are proposed to be assessed City of Fontana Page 1 of 3 Printed on 7/7/2026
powered by Legistar™1708
File #: 26-1017 Agenda Date: 7/14/2026
Agenda #: C. Category: Public Hearing
based on a citywide rate, rather than a zone-by-zone calculation as prior studies included.

Based on the findings of the Study and internal analysis of the recommendations included, staff recommends adoption of the updated DIF schedule for public facilities, police, fire, library, landscape medians, local arterials, active transportation, traffic signals, sewer, and storm drain systems, as depicted below. Fees not shown on the table below are not impacted by this recommendation.

Please note that the below table includes a recommendation for imposition of only 50% of the maximum legally justifiable storm drain fee identified in the Study for Single Family Detached Residential units, as well as Commercial and Industrial uses to maintain development activity and support continued economic investment. The City will, as needed, seek grant opportunities or contribute funding from unrestricted revenue sources to ensure timely completion of storm drain facilities.

To ensure the fee schedule remains current with increases in construction and service delivery costs, staff also recommends incorporating an annual inflationary adjustment to all DIF based on the annual percentage increase in the California Construction Cost Index. This provision, included in the adopting Resolution, would authorize the City Manager or their designee to implement annual inflationary fee adjustments without further action from the City Council.

In preparation for the public hearing, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Bernardino County Sun on June 12th, 2026, and again on June 29th, 2026, providing notice of the Updates to the Development Impact Fees. Additionally, written notice, including the Development Impact Fee Study (Exhibit “A”), was provided to all interested parties who requested such notice at least 14 days prior to the public hearing.

Approval of this report and adoption of the attached Resolution will establish the updated DIF program and provide a structured mechanism for future DIF adjustments. If approved, the new DIF City of Fontana Page 2 of 3 Printed on 7/7/2026
powered by Legistar™1709
File #: 26-1017 Agenda Date: 7/14/2026
Agenda #: C. Category: Public Hearing
schedule shall be effective immediately but shall not be assessed to new development until July 1, 2027. The annual inflationary adjustment shall be effective July 1, 2028, and each July 1 thereafter.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact associated with the approval of this item will result in fee revenue increases that will be better estimated as activity occurs. Actual revenue will be dependent upon fee related activities.

MOTION:

Approve staff recommendation.

City of Fontana Page 3 of 3 Printed on 7/7/2026
powered by Legistar™1710
1 of 8
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-078

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FONTANA,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS

STUDY, THE FINDINGS CONTAINED THEREIN, AND INCREASING THE

AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO FINANCE CERTAIN

PUBLIC FACILITIES AND TAKING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS
RELATED THERETO.

WHEREAS, the City of Fontana (the “City”) City Council (the “City Council”) recognizes the need to adequately finance certain public facilities including general use public facilities, police, fire, library, parks and recreation, transportation, storm drain, and sewer facilities (collectively, the “Facilities”) made necessary by the impacts from new development occurring within the City and desires to ensure that new development mitigates its impacts on such Facilities in compliance with Chapter 5, Division 1, Title 7 of the California Government Code commencing with section 66000 et seq. known as the Mitigation Fee Act (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the City has identified the need for new and/or expanded facilities to accommodate expected population growth and new development; and WHEREAS, it is the City’s policy that future new development should pay its fair share of public facilities in accordance with good fiscal management as determined by the City Council, including the current costs for providing the Facilities in direct proportion to the demand for these Facilities generated by new development through the payment of development impact fees (“DIF”); and
WHEREAS, the City retained an independent third-party consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of the Facilities needed to accommodate new development and prepare a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (“Study”) in accordance with the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Study provided the City with information and data regarding the nexus between the planned public improvements and the benefiting land uses that would pay the DIF; and
WHEREAS, the Study also provides the City with the findings necessary to impose the proposed increased DIF in accordance with section 66001 of the Act; and WHEREAS, certain of the impact fees for sewer facilities are “capacity charges” within the meaning of Government Code section 66013, and the Study provides evidence that such capacity charges do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the services for which they are imposed; and
1711
Resolution No. 2026-078
2 of 6
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the adoption of the proposed Study and DIF and provided an opportunity for the public to be heard, pursuant to the provisions of sections 66016.5, 66018, and 66019 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Study has been made available for public review and comment pursuant to the provisions of section 66016.5 and 66019 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the Study and the findings contained therein as the findings of the City Council, which Study is attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and to adopt the DIF schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined, and ordered by the City Council of the City of Fontana, California, as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and made an operative part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that the Study complies with the Act by establishing the basis for the imposition of the DIF on new development. The City Council hereby adopts the findings set forth in the Study attached hereto as Exhibit “A” as the findings of the City Council, which contain the following information with respect to each development impact fee, which by this reference are incorporated herein as if fully stated herein.
(a) Identifies the purpose of the fee;
(b) Identifies the use to which the fee will be put;
(c) Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed;
(d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development projects on which the fee is imposed; and
(e) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

Detailed descriptions of the required findings are contained in the Study within the description of each fee.

Further, the City Council finds that, based on the evidence set forth in the Study, the impact fees that are “capacity charges” within the meaning of Government Code section 1712
Resolution No. 2026-078
3 of 6
66013 do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the services for which such capacity charges are imposed.

Section 3. The City Council hereby determines that the DIF collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public improvements described or identified in the Study, or such other public facility master plan(s) or capital improvement program(s) as may from time to time be adopted by the City Council.

Section 4. The City Council has considered the specific project descriptions and the cost estimates identified in the Study and hereby approves such project descriptions and cost estimates and finds them reasonable as the basis for calculating and imposing the DIF.

Section 5. The City Council finds that the projects and fee methodology identified in the Study are consistent with the City's General Plan and the requirements of the Act.

Section 6. The City Council approves the schedule of DIF contained in and attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” The DIF shall be imposed upon property owners or developers when applying for a building permit or due at final inspection or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, as provided in the Act.

Section 7. The City Council further finds that an annual inflation adjustment is a necessary component of the DIF to ensure the revenue collected keeps pace with the costs of constructing the Facilities defined in the Study. Keeping pace with inflation ensures projects can be timely completed as needed to accommodate new development.

Timely completion of projects also ensures those who have paid the DIF receive the benefit of their contributions towards the Facilities while at the same time mitigating the expected impacts to the existing community, as authorized in the Act. Without an annual inflationary adjustment projects could become delayed, underfunded, and potentially infeasible due to insufficient funds available to complete such projects. As such, the DIF shall be annually adjusted pursuant to the following provisions:
(a) Commencing July 1, 2028, and each July 1 thereafter, the DIF schedule shall be increased by the percentage increase in the California Construction Cost Index calculated by the year-over-year annual change in the California Construction Cost Index, or a comparable index if such California Construction Cost Index is discontinued or is otherwise not available. In the event the calculated percentage change in the California Construction Cost Index is negative for any year, the DIF schedule from the immediate preceding fiscal year shall serve as the current fiscal year’s DIF schedule without adjustment;
(b) The annual inflation adjustments shall be imposed each July 1 without further action of the City Council or need for future public hearings, until such time as a new impact fee nexus study and DIF are adopted pursuant to the Act, or this authorization is revoked by the City Council; and 1713
Resolution No. 2026-078
4 of 6
(c) The City Manager, or their designee, is hereby authorized to apply the annual inflation adjustment to the DIF schedule each year.

Section 8. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

Section 9. a. The City, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has evaluated the potential environmental impacts of adopting the Study and DIF. As the decision making body for the City, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for the adoption of the Study and DIF.
b. The City Council finds that the Study and DIF are intended to fund future projects, programs, and capital improvement projects related to the City’s need to finance capital improvements to provide adequate infrastructure to meet growth-related needs. The Study and DIF do not commit the City to approve any particular project, program, or capital improvement, and the DIF, as collected, will be deposited into separate funds for potential future projects. The DIF is in response to the City’s projected need for additional facilities and infrastructure to provide services to new development. Any activities, including infrastructure improvements, to be funded by the DIF will be subject to applicable law, including but not limited to future environmental review under CEQA, as applicable, prior to City approval.
c. The City Council therefore finds that the Study and DIF are not subject to environmental review under CEQA. First, the Study and DIF, in and of themselves, do not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and therefore are not considered a “project” under CEQA. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065, 14 Cal.

Code Regs., § 15378, subd. (a).) Second, the Study and DIF are covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment; here, there is no possibility that the Study and DIF, in and of themselves, may have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15061, subd. (b)(3).) And third, the Study and DIF are considered a government funding mechanism that do not involve any commitment on behalf of the City to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15378, subd. (b)(4).)
d. The City Council has considered any comments received at the public hearing on July 14, 2026, prior to adoption of this Resolution.
e. The determination that the Study and DIF are not subject to CEQA review reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis.
1714
Resolution No. 2026-078
5 of 6
f. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at City of Fontana City Hall, 16860 Valencia Ave., Fontana, CA 92335. The custodians for these records are the City Clerk and Public Works Director.

Section 10. The City Manager, or designee thereof, is authorized to take all actions necessary or convenient to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption, and all resolutions, ordinances, or administrative actions by the City Council, or parts thereof, that are inconsistent or in conflict with any provision of this Resolution are hereby superseded only to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. The new DIF schedule attached hereto shall become effective July 1, 2027, a period which is at least sixty (60) days following the adoption of this Resolution by the City Council.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 2026.

READ AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

City Attorney
I, Germaine Key, City Clerk of the City of Fontana, and Ex-Officio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the actual resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on the 14th day of July, 2026, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

City Clerk of the City of Fontana
Mayor of the City of Fontana
1715
Resolution No. 2026-078
6 of 6
ATTEST:

City Clerk
1716
Exhibit “A”
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study
1717
Exhibit “B”
Development Impact Fee Schedule
1718
Irvine | San Jose | San Francisco | Riverside
Dallas | El Paso | Raleigh | Tampa
www.F inance DTA .com
Public Finance
Public - Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT

IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION
STUDY

CITY OF FONTANA
Report Date : May 26 , 202 6
1719
www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 220
Irvine, CA 92612

CITY OF FONTANA

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE
Prepared for:

City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Ave.

Fontana , CA 9 2335
Attention: Gia Kim
1720
TABLE

OF CONTENT S

SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................1 A Organization of the Fee Study .........................................1 B DIF Summary .......................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................4

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ......................................6 DEMOGRAPHICS ...........................................................11 A Existing Residential Land Uses ......................................12 B Existing Non - Residential Land Uses .............................13 C Future Residential Land Uses (2044) ............................14 D Future Non - Residential Land Uses (2044) ..................15 METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE FEES ........16
A Standards - Based Fee Methodology ..............................16 B Plan - Based Fee Methodology ........................................16 C Capacity - Based Fee Methodology ................................16 D Summary of Fee Methodology .......................................17 E Allocation of Benefit ........................................................18 CALCULATION OF FEES ...............................................21 A Public Facilities ..................................................................21 B Police ...................................................................................27 C Fire DIFs ..............................................................................33 D Library DIFs ........................................................................39 E Parks and Recreation DIFs ..............................................45 F Landscape Medians .........................................................50 G Local Arterials ....................................................................57 H Active Transportation Plan .............................................64 I Traffic Signals ....................................................................71 J Sewer DIFs ..........................................................................78 1721
K Storm Drain Fees ...............................................................85 IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE SCHEDULE ....................91
A The Collection of DIFs .....................................................91 B The Assignment and Expenditure of Fee Revenue ...92
C Exemptions, Reductions, and Waivers .........................92 D Developer Improvement Credits ...................................93 E Existing Development Credit .........................................93 F Annual Reporting and Accounting of Fees. ................93 G Refunding Policy ...............................................................94 H Annual Update of the CIP ...............................................95 I Administration Costs of Fee Implementation ............96 J Indexing of Impact Fee Rates. ........................................96 K Updating the Impact Fee Study .....................................96 L Administering an Impact Fee Program. .......................96 SUMMARY OF FEES .......................................................98

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A FEE DERIVATION WORKSHEETS

APPENDIX B INVENTORY AND FACILITIES NEEDS
LIST

APPENDIX C CITY OF FONTANA CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT LIST
1722
1 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In order to adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA Public Finance, Inc. (“DTA”) , was retained by the City of Fontana , CA (the “City”) to update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new Assembly Bill (“ AB ”) 1600 fee justification study (the “Fee Study”). The previous fee justification s tudy was completed in December 20 19, and the current fees are based on its findings . Th e categories of Development Impact F ees (“DIFs” or “Fees”) to be determined by this Fee Study include Public Facilities , Police, Fire, Library, Parks, Landscape Maintenance, Local Arterials, Active Transportation Plan , Traffic Signals , Sewer, and Storm Drain at levels identified by the various City departments as being necessary to meet the needs of new development.

The purpose of this Fee Study will be to establish a nexus between the anticipated development and the City's public facilities needs through 204 4. Th is Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66000 et seq . of the Government Code, which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities required by new development (“Future Facilities”) and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified in the Facilities Inventory and Needs List, which is included in Appendix B of the Fee Study. A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section V. The purpose of this Fee Study is to ensure that all new development is required to pay its “fair share” of the cost of new infrastructure through the development fee program.

A Organization of the Fee Study
This Fee Study will be presented in the following seven sections:

Section I contains an Executive Summary and provides a brief introduction to the Fee Study and includes an overview of the proposed DIFs .

Section II is an Introduction that includ es a brief description of City surroundings and background information on DIF funding .

Section III provides an overview of the legal requirements for implementing and imposing the DIF amounts identified in the Fee Study and satisfies the nexus requirements for each facility included as part of this Fee Study . Included is a discussion of the findings and requirements necessary to be satisfied when establishing, increasing , or imposing a fee as a condition of new development .

Section IV includes a discussion of land use characteristics and demand variables of projected new development such as the number of housing units and the number of non -residential building square feet , assuming current growth trends in residential and non -residential development projected through 20 44.

Section V contains a description of the methodology used to determine the Fees for Future Facilities and presents the fees for each of the land use types. 1723
2 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Section VI presents the calculation of the Fees for each land use .

Section VII presents a summary of the Fees .

This Fee Study also include s an appendix section presenting the calculations and other relevant material used to determine the findings presented in this Fee Study , as noted below :

Appendix A includes the calculations used to determine the various Fee levels.

Appendix B includes the Facilities Inventory and Needs List used to determine the various Fee levels .

B DIF Summary
Per the results of this Fee Study, the total fee amounts required to finance new development’s share of Future Facilities are identified in Table ES - 1 below. Fees presented in this Fee Study represent the maximum DIFs that may be imposed by the City under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . Residential fees are listed on a per -square -foot basis . Both Residential an d non -residential fees are listed on a per-square -foot basis . Based on the findin gs in th is Fee Study, the following recommendations are presented.

Table ES - 1: DIF Summary
Land Use 1 2 Public
Facilities Police Fire Library Parks Landscape Medians
Local
Arterials
Active
Trans.

Plan
Traffic
Signals Sewer
Residential $0.57 $0.55 $0.13 $0.04 $1.26 $0.07 $0.08 $0.22 $0.10 $0.36 Commercial $0.42 $0.41 $0.10 $0.03 - $0.39 $0.44 $1.17 $0.53 $0.18 Industrial $0.12 $0.11 $0.03 $0.01 - $0.13 $0.15 $0.39 $0.18 $0.12 Note s:

1. Residential fees are for single -family residences, multi -family residences, and mobile homes and are per square foot to comply with California AB 602.

2. Non -Residential fees are per 1,000 square feet .

The Storm Drain fees presented in Table ES - 2 below are calculated based on the amount of surface area on a property. Surfaces , such as buildings, driveways, patios, and parking lots, are hard surfaces that prevent rainwater from soaking into the ground, increas ing stormwater runoff. This runoff needs to be managed to prevent flooding and protect water quality. In this analysis, storm drain fees are based on the number of acres.

Table ES - 2: Proposed Storm Drain DIF Summary
Land Use Category Fee per Impervious Acre
Residential $77,138
Commercial/Retail $122,136
Industrial $102,851
1724
3 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
The cost estimates for facilities used in this Fee Study are in 202 5 dollars. Therefore, DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an annual inflationary adjustment based upon the California Construction Cost Index (“CCCI”). This construction cost index is based on the average of the Building Cost Index (“BCI”) cost indices for Los Angeles, as produced by Engineering News -Record (“ENR”).
1725
4 SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

INTRODUCTION
Located in the County of San Bernardino, about 50 miles east of Los Angeles, the City of Fontana (“the City”) and its Sphere of Influence (“SOI”) encompasses an area of approximately 52 square miles and is currently home to an estimated population of over 214,000 people. It is considered a regional hub of the trucking industry, with the east – west Interstate 10 and State Route 210 crossing the city and Interstate 15 passing diagonally through its northwestern quadrant.

In order to adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA Public Finance, Inc. (“DTA”), was retained by the City of Fontana, CA (the “City”) to update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1600 fee justification study (the “Fee Study”). The previous fee justification study was completed in December 2019 , and the current fees are based on its findings . Th e categories of Development Impact Fee s (“DIFs” or “Fees”) to be determined by this Fee Study include Public Facilities, Police, Fire, Library, Parks, Landscape Maintenance, Local Arterials, Active Transportation Plan, Traffic Signals , Sewer, and Storm Drain at levels identified by the various City departments as being necessary to meet the needs of new development.

The purpose of this Fee Study will be to establish a nexus between the anticipated development and the City's public facilities needs through 2044.

This Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities required by new development (“Future Facilities”) and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Futur e Facilities. The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified in the Facilities Inventory and Needs List, which is included in Appendix B of the Fee Study. A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section V. The purpose of this Fee Study is to ensure that all new development is required to pay its “fair share” of the cost of new infrastructure through the development fee program.

The purpose of this Fee Study is to ensure that all new development is required to pay its “fair share” of the cost of new infrastructure through the DIF program . The Fees generated in this Fee Study are one -time fees , typically paid prior to the issuance of a building permit, imposed on development projects by local agencies that regulate land use. The se Fee amounts , to be determined , will be set at levels identified as necessary to meet the needs of new development through 204 4.

Fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities required to support new development.

The steps followed in the Fee Study include:

1. Demographic Assumptions : Identify future growth that represents the increased demand for Future F acilities ;
1726
5 SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

2. Facility Needs and Costs : Identify current facilities inventory to determine Level of Service (“LOS ”) requirements and d etermine the Future Facilities required to support new development and the costs of such facilities ;

3. Cost Allocation : Allocate costs of Future Facilities on a per-equivalent -dwelling - unit or equivalent - benefit -unit basis ; and

4. Fee Schedule : Calculate the Fee amount per square foot for residential development, and the Fee amounts per thousand square f eet for non -residential development .
1727
6 SECTION I II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The City has identified the need to levy DIFs to pay for Public Facilities, Police, Fire, Library, Parks, Landscape Medians, Local Arterials, Active Transportation Plan, Traffic Signals , Sewer, and Storm Drain . The Fees will finance facilities on the Needs Lists at levels identified by the City as appropriate for new development. Upon the City Council's adoption of the Fee Study and the required legal documents , all new development will be required to pay its “fair share” of the cost of facilities on the Needs Lists through these Fees. The Fees are established pursuant to AB 1600, as described below.

Prior to World War II, development in California was held responsible for very little of the cost of public infrastructure. Public improvements were financed primarily through jurisdictional General Funds and utility charges. It was not uncommon during t his period for speculators to subdivide tracts of land without providing any public improvements, expecting the closest city to eventually annex a project and provide public improvements and services.

However, starting in the late 1940s, the use of impact fees grew as planning and regulation of new development increased . During the 1960s and 1970s, the California Courts broadened the right of local governments to impose fees on developers for public improvements not located on project sites. More recently, with the passage of Proposition 13, limits on general revenues for new infrastructure have resulted in new development being held responsible for a greater share of public improvements, and both the use of impact fees and their levels have grown substantially. Higher fee levels were undoubtedly driven , in part, by the need to offset the decline in funding for infrastructure development from other sources.

The levy of impact fees is an authorized method of financing the public facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development, as it provides funding to maintain an agency's existing LOS for an increased service population. A fee is “a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a develop ment project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the develop ment project...” (California Government Code, Section 66000). A fee may be levied for each type of capital improvement required for new development, with payment due prior to the start of construction of a dwelling unit or non - residential building (or prior to the expansion of existing buildings of these types). Fees are often levied at final map recordation, at the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or, more commonly, at the issuance of a building permit .

AB 1600, which created Section 66000 et. seq. of the Government Code, was enacted by the State of California in 1987. This Fee Study is intended to meet the Nexus or Benefit Requirements of AB 1600, which mandates a nexus between the fees imposed, their use, and the development projects on which they are imposed.
1728
7 SECTION I II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
A Government Code Section 66001
In 2006, Government Code Section 66001 was amended to clarify that a fee cannot include costs attributable to existing deficiencies but may fund costs to maintain the existing LOS or to meet an adopted LOS consistent with the General Plan. Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code requires all public agencies to satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)];

2. Identify the use to which the fee will be put [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)];

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is to be imposed [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)];

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is to be imposed [Government Code Section 66001(a)(4)]; and

5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

The sections below present each of the five requirements listed above as they relate to imposing the proposed fees.

A.1 Purpose of the Fee [Government Code Section 66001(A)(1)] New residential and non -residential development within the City will generate additional residents and employees who will require additional public facilities. Land for these facilities will have to be acquired , and public facilities and equipment will have to be expanded, constructed, or purchased to meet this increased demand.

This Fee Study has been prepared in response to the projected direct and cumulative effects of future development. Each new development will contribute to the need for new public facilities. Without future development, many of the new public facilities on the Needs Lists would not be necessary , as the existing facilities are adequate for the City’s present population. In instances where facilities would be built regardless of new development, the costs of such facilities have been allocated to new and ex isting development based on their respective level of benefit.

The proposed impact fee will be charged on all future development in the City, irrespective of location . Even future “infill” development projects contribute to impacts on public facilities because they are an integral part of a much larger network of development throughout the City. First, the property owners and/or the tenants associated with any new development in the City can be expected to place additional demands on City facilities funded by the fee. Second, these property owners and tenants are de pendent on , and, in fact, may not have chosen to utilize, 1729
8 SECTION I II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
their development, except for residential, retail, employment, and recreational opportunities located nearby on other existing and future developments . Third, the availability of residents, employees, and customers throughout the City has a growth -inducing impact , without which some of the “infill” development would not occur. As a result, all development projects in the City contribute to cumulative development impacts .

The impact fees will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of public facilities identified on the Needs Lists and appropriate administrative costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City.

A.2 The Use to Which the Fee is to be Put [Government Code Section 66001(A)(2)]
The fee will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs Lists, included in Section IV of the Fee Study, and other appropriate costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new devel opment in the City. The fee will provide a source of revenue to the City to allow for the acquisition, installation, and construction of public facilities, which in turn will maintain the current standard of service, preserve the quality of life in the Ci ty, and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future residents, visitors, and employees.

A.3 Determine That There is a Reasonable Relationship Between the Fee’s Use and the Type of Development Project Upon Which the Fee is Imposed (Benefit Relationship) [Government Code Section 66001(A)(3)] The reasonable relationship findings required by Government Cose section 66001 are satisfied by category -specific demand metrics selected to reflect how different forms of development consume public facility capacity. Depending on the fee category, the Fe e Study allocates costs based on building area, dwelling -unit characteristics, service population, hotel rooms, utility meter size, wastewater connection demand, traffic demand, impervious area, or other measures reasonably correlated with facility impacts , Although no single metric is appropriate for all public facility systems, each metric used in this Fee Study is intended to serve as a reasonable proxy for the burden the applicable type of development places on the corresponding facility category.

A.4 Determine How There is a Reasonable Relationship Between the Need for the Public Facility and the Type of Development Project Upon Which the Fee is Imposed (Impact Relationship) [Government Code Section 66001(A)(4)]
The reasonable relationship findings required by Government Code section 66001 are satisfied through category -specific demand metrics selected to reflect the manner in which different forms of development consume public Facility capacity. 1730
9 SECTION I II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Depending on the fee category, the Fee Study allocates costs based on building area, dwelling -unit characteristics, service population, hotel room, utility meter size, wastewater connection demand, traffic demand, impervious area, or other measures reasona bly correlated with facility impacts, Although no single metric is appropriate for all public facility systems, each metric used in this Fee Study is intended to serve as a reasonable proxy for the burden the applicable type of development places on the c orresponding facility category.

A.5 The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the Public Facilities Attributable to the Development Upon Which the Fee is Imposed (“Rough Proportionality” Relationship) [Government Code Section 66001(A)]
The reasonable relationship findings required by Government Code section 66001 are satisfied through category -specific demand metrics that reflect how different forms of development consume public facility capacity. Depending on the fee category, the Fee Study allocates costs based on building area, dwelling -unit characteristics, service population, hotel rooms, utility meter size, wastewater connection demand, traffic demand, impervious area, or other measures reasonably correlated with facility impacts. Although no single metric is appropriate for all public facility systems, each metric used in this Fee Study is intended to serve as a reasonable proxy for the burden the applicable type of development places on the corresponding facility category.

B AB 602
The impact fees included herein were circumscribed by the requirements of AB 602, which was approved by the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom in 2021.

Among the significant impacts of AB 602 are the following:

On or after January 1, 2022, fee justification studies must identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and (if the proposed new LOS is greater than the existing LOS) include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary.

For housing development projects, Nexus Studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate the amount of fees based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate. T he bill would require that a “local agency that calculated fees proportionally to the square footage of the proposed units be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by developm ent.” This would also apply to multi -family residences.

The bill also requires the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”), on or before January 1, 2024, to create an impact fee Nexus Study template 1731
10 SECTION I II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
that may be used by local jurisdictions to calculate their fees. The bill requires the template to include a method to assess the feasibility of building housing at a specified fee level. The template must be completed by 2024. Local jurisdictions will have the option (it will not be required) to use the HCD template.

The bill authorizes any member of the public, including an applicant for a development project, to submit evidence that the city, county, or other local agency had failed to comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The bill requires the legislative body of the city, county, or other local agency to consider any timely -submitted evidence and to authorize the legislative body to change or adjust the proposed fee or fee increase, as specified.

If a Nexus Study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumption of the Nexus Study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of the fees collected under the original fee.

Large jurisdictions (county population greater than 250,000) and cities within those counties must adopt a Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) as part of the Nexus Study.

Nexus Studies shall be updated at least every 8 years from the period beginning January 1, 2023.

Importantly, AB 602 does not apply to (i) water and sewer connection and capacity charges, (ii) school fees, and (iii) Mello -Roos or other taxes. These other fees, taxes, and charges are subject to their own statutory accountability measures. 1732
11 SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

DEMOGRAPHICS
To determine the facilities needed to serve new development and establish fee amounts to fund such facilities, DTA has researched and reviewed material containing information on future land use development within the City through 204 4. For the purposes of this Fee Study, DTA categorized developable residential land uses as single -family, multi -family, and mobile -home residences. Developable non -residential land uses within the City are categorized as commercial and industrial zones and are summarized in det ail in the following section.

Elements from the City’s 2015 - 2035 General Plan Update (the “General Plan”) , numbers from the California Department of Finance, US Census, and total square footage generated by the CoStar Real Estate Software Platform (“CoStar”) were used as estimates for the number of housing units and non -residential building square feet to be built within the City. The City’s land use decisions will also affect properties within its sphere of influence (“SOI ”). California law requires that a General Plan “cover the territory within the boundaries of an adopted City , as well as any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its planning.”
In addition, information from the General Plan and estimates produced by DTA were used to project the additional land use s resulting from new developments . Notably, DTA attempted to use metrics (e.g., average household size, square footage) to standardize existing demographics against the General Plan projections . Future residents and employees will create additional demand for facilities that existing public facilities cannot adequately service. To accommodate new development in an orderly manner while maintaining the current quality of life in the City, the facilities on the Inventory and Facility Needs List (presented throughout Section VI and in Appendix B ), as reviewed and approved by City staff , must be constructed.

For facilities needed to mitigate demand from new development, facility costs have been allocated solely to new development . In those instances when it has been determined that the new facilities will serve both existing and new development, facility costs have been allocated based on proportionate benefit [see the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) and Equ ivalent Benefit Unit (“EBU ”) discussion in Section V ].

In addition, DTA has determined that utilizing a Persons Served population, comprised of all residents and 50% of employees , is common practice in quantifying the impact of a new development in a given service area, and this metric will be used in both residential and non -residential employee populations and calculations throughout this Fee Study .

Table 1 presents a summary of the land uses covered in this Fee Study. As previously indicated, the Fee Study will determine the Fees for three (3) specific land -use categories :
residential , commercial , and industrial. Notably, t he table below illustrates typical land uses in each category and is not a comprehensive list of all the City’s potential land uses . 1733
12 SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
A Existing Residential Land Use s
Demographic data from the Nielsen Company (a leading information, measurement, and data analytics company), the California Department of Finance, and the US Census Bureau were used to estimate the existing number of housing units and the City's population .

Notably, DTA attempted to use metrics (e.g., average household size, square footage) to standardize existing demographics with DTA’s projections.

Table 1: Summary of Land Use Categories
Land Use Classification Fee
Study Definition
Residential
Includes single -family detached homes and single -family attached homes. Also includes buildings with attached residential units , including apartments, town homes, condominiums, mobile homes, and all other residential units not classified as Single - Family . For purposes of determining the impact fees due, any "second unit" or "accessory dwelling unit" (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code) shall be considered a separate residential unit and shall be subject to this fee.

Commercial
Includes but is not limited to buildings used for the following:

Retail and commercial lodging;
Service -oriented business activities, wineries/vineyards, and car washes; Department stores, discount stores, furniture/appliance outlets, home improvement centers;
Shopping Centers;
Entertainment centers;
Assisted Living, houses of worship;
Subregional and regional shopping centers;
Hotel. Motels, spas , and resorts; and
Grocery stores, storage facilities.

Business/professional office;
Medical/dental office;
Office park , research park, business park; and
General office buildings
Industrial
Includes but is not limited to buildings used for the following:

Light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, and logistics wholesaling; Wholesale and warehouse retail;
Food processing;
Industrial park; and
Industrial/light industrial.
1734
13 SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
According to the California Department of Finance, the US Census Bureau, and the Nielsen Company, there are currently 214,223 residents in 58,993 single -family, multi -family, and mobile home housing units in the City. The residential persons -per-unit figure of 3.70 was also derived from 202 5 data published by the California Department of Finance. Notably, the 3.63 residents -per-unit estimate for the City included units that are currently vacant. As a result, this figure is lower than the California Department of Finance' s 3.63 residents -perunit figure, which includes only occupied housing units. Table 2 , presented below, summarizes the existing demographics for the City’s residential land uses.

Table 2: Estimated Existing Residential Development 1
Residential Land Use Existing
Residents Existing Housing Units Residents per Unit
Residential 214,223 58,993 3.63
Total 214,223 58,993 3.63
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

B Existing Non -Residential Land Use s
The existing non -residential square footage was compiled and estimated using the CoStar Real Estate Software Platform. In addition , the employees per square foot for non - residential land uses was based on information published in Nielsen Company Employment Profiles by NAICS Codes 202 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business eco nomy . T he number of non -residential building square footage presented below in Table 3 is considered “existing non -residential development”.

As reflected in Table 3 below , the City has approximately 33,885,549 total square feet of existing non -residential development, including approximately 13,076,718 square feet of commercial development and 20,808,831 square feet of industrial development .

Per Nielsen Company’s Employment Profiles (202 5), the City has 81,745 employees in these non -residential sectors, specifically 45,590 commercial and 36,155 industrial employees .

T hese numbers were based on existing employee and square footage data, yielding employees -per-thousand -square -foot factors (“EPSFs”) of 2.75 for the commercial sector and 0.75 for the industrial sector. These EPSF numbers are presented in detail in Appendix A.

1735
14 SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 3: Estimated Existing Non -Residential Development Non -Residential Land Use Existing
Employees
Persons
Served
Existing Building
Square Footage
Commercial 45,590 22,795 13,882,988
Industrial 36,155 18,077 72,309,782
Total 81,745 40,873 86,192,770
C Future Residential Land Uses ( 204 4)
Using population projections from the City’s 2015 -2035 General Plan updated in September 2022 , DTA determined that the City is expected to grow by 20,462 residential units by the end of the 204 4 build -out period in this Fee Study . The projected residential growth rates by the General Plan were used over the build -out period to generate the number of future housing units shown below. As indicated in Table 4 , based on the assumed projected growth rates, DTA determined that the City is expected to add 20,462 residential units by the end of the 204 4 build -out period.

Table 4: Projected Residential Development over Build -Out Period 1 Residential Land Use Future
Residents Future Housing Units Residents per Unit
Residential 74,304 20,462 3.63
Total 74,304 20,462 3.63
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

To comply with AB 602 , DTA worked with the City staff to determine the average square footage for both single -family and multi -family residences. Using building permit information from 201 8 to 202 3, DTA calculated that the combined average residential square foot unit was 1,951 square feet across single -family and multi -family residences .

Based on the anticipated total future residential development of 20,462, the total area amounts to 39,912,787 sq. ft. , as shown in the table below .

Table 5: Future Residential Development Sq. Ft.

Category Total
Total Residential Units 20,462
Average Sq. Ft. per Unit 1,951
Total Residential Sq. Ft. 39,912,787
1736
15 SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
D Fu ture Non -Residential Land Uses (204 4)
Using employment projections from the City’s General Plan cited earlier , DTA determined that the City ’s non -residential sector is assumed to grow at an average annualized growth rate of 0.49%. Based on the EPSF derived above, t his translates to approximately 27,492,779 square feet of non -residential development over the build -out period . This includes approximately 6,893,730 square feet of commercial and 20,599,049 square feet of industrial development .

Table 6: Projected Non -Residential Development over Build -Out Period Non -Residential Land Use Future
Employees
Persons
Served
Future Building
Square Feet
Commercial 11,546 5,773 6,893,730
Industrial 33,527 16,763 20,599,049
Total 45,072 22,536 27,492,779
1737
16 SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULAT E FEES
There are several accepted methodologies for calculating fees, but they all rely on determining the cost of needed improvements and assigning those costs equitably across various types of development. In determining a reasonable nexus for each specific type of public facility, DTA utilized the methodologies described below, depending upon the data and information available from the City and its current infrastructure policies.

A Standards -Based Fee Methodology
The methodology for establishing the DIFs is based on the existing LOS . This Standards -Based Methodology establishes a generic unit cost for capacity , which is then applied to each land use in accordance with the existing LOS. The LOS is based on the existing number of applicable units, such as square feet of building space , acres of land, or residents per facility . This standard is not based on cost but rather on a standard of service.

The Standards -Based Methodology ensures that City facilities are app ropriately developed and sized so that future residents and employees do not reduce LOS by unduly burdening the infrastructure system, which could lead to decay and deterioration. This methodology provides several advantages, including not needing to know the cost of a specific facility, how much capacity or service the current system provides, or committing to a specific facility size . Although this methodology is not used to calculate the fees generated in this Fee Study, the description is provided to help the City understands the various methodologies available for calculating fees.

B Plan -Based Fee Methodology
The methodology used to establish the DIFs outlined in this Fee Study for Public Facilities, Police, Fire, Library, Parks, Storm Drain, Landscape M edians , Local Arterials, Active Transportation Plan, Traffic Signals , Sewer and Storm Drain is based on a “plan,” such as a Master Plan of Facilities, Capital Improvement Plan , or General Plan, which identifies a finite set of improvements to be implemented . These Facility Plans generally identify a finite set of facilities needed by the public agency and are de veloped based on assessments of facility needs prepared by staff and/or outside consultants and adopted by the public agency’s legislative body. Using this plan -based approach, specific costs can be projected and assigned to all planned land uses, often with a time horizon that reflects projected new development . Using population, units, and residential and non -residential square footage , it is possible to assign a cost allocation percentage for both new and existing development.

In preparing an impact fee analysis, facility costs attributable to future development can be allocated to each land - use class in proportion to the demand generated by each developm ent type .

C Capacity -Based Fee Methodology
Another method of fee assessment used is based on the “capacity” of a service or system, such as a water tank , a sewer plant , or a storm drain. This kind of fee is not dependent on a particular land use plan (i.e., amount or intensity) but rather is based on a rate or cost per unit of capacity that can be applied to any type of development, as long as the system has 1738
17 SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
adequate capacity. This fee is useful when the costs of the facility or system are unknown at the outset . However, it requires that the capacity used by a particular land - use type be measurable or estimable and that the information be available . Capacity -based impact fees are assessed based on the demand rate per unit. Although this methodology is not used to calculate any fees in this Fee Study, the description is provided so that the City understands the various methodologies available for calculating fees.

D Summary of Fee Methodology
In this Fee Study , the Plan -based methodology is used to generate the fees for Public Facilities, Police, Fire, Library, Parks and Recreation , Landscape Maintenance, Local Arterials, Active Transportation Plan, and Traffic Signals , Sewer, and Storm Drain . This is summarized in Table 7 below.

Table 7: Fee Methodology (by Fee Category Type)
Fee Category Methodology Basis of Methodology
Public Facilities
Plan - Based
Needs List
Police Needs List
Fire Needs List
Library Needs List
Parks and Recreation Needs List
Landscape Medians Needs List
Local Arterials Needs List
Active Transportation Needs List
Traffic Signals Needs List
Sewer Needs List
Storm Drain Needs List
For Fee calculat ions using the Plan -Based approach, t he City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). For the purposes of the City’s DIF program, the Needs List is intended to be the official public document identifying the facilities eligible for financing , in whole or in part, through the imposition of a DIF on new development within the City. The Needs List is organized by facility element (or type) and includes cost information, as outlined in Table 8 below. 1739
18 SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 8: Description of Needs List Cost Section s
Column Title Contents Source
Total Cost for Facility
The total estimated facility cost , including engineering, design, construction, land acquisition, and equipment (as applicable) .

City
Offsetting Revenues
to New and Existing
Development
Share of total offsetting revenues allocated to new and existing development .

City
Net Cost to City The difference between the total cost and the offsetting revenues (column 1 plus column 2) .

Calculated by
DTA
Percent of Cost
Allocated to New
Development
Net cost is allocated to new development based on its share of facilities .

Calculated by
DTA and the City
Net Cost Allocated to
New Development
The net cost to the City is multiplied by the percentage cost allocated to new development .

Calculated by
DTA
Policy Background or
Objective Identifies the policy source or rationale for facility need .

City General Plan ,
CIP, City Staff
The facilities included on the Needs List for each Fee (presented in Appendix B ) are provided by the City and reflect either the Cit y’s goals of maintaining and improving a specific area, or they are part of a more formal policy document, such as a General Plan, Master Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, or other official policy or document , etc. Specific estimated facility costs are provided by the City and used as a basis for determining the allocation of revenues between new and existing development. DTA surveyed City staff and comparable developments to determine the required facili ties to serve new development, as a starting point for its fee calculations.

E Allocation of Benefit
E.1 EDUs and EBUs
The methodologies employed in this Fee Study use EDUs and EBUs to identify and quantify the benefits of certain facilities and to ensure that an equitable portion of the total facilities costs is allocated to future growth, based on the proportion of need generated by that growth. Specifically, EDUs are generated in the demographic portion of this Fee Study and are used to generate the land use calculations. EDUs are a means of quantifying differ ent land uses by their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, with equivalence measured by the potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility. In this Fee Study, EDUs are used as the basis for allocating Public Facilities , Police , Fire, Library , Parks and Sewer . In contrast, for Landscape Medians, Local Arterial Streets, Active Transportation , Traffic Signals and Storm Drain, EBUs are used to allocate costs to future growth and to generate fees.

This is explained further in this section and in detail in Appendix A. 1740
19 SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 9: Basis of Allocation (by Fee Category Type)
Fee Category Basis of Allocation of Benefit (EBU Factor) Public Facilities Persons Served
Police Persons Served
Fire Persons Served
Parks Persons Served
Landscape Medians Average Daily Trips (“ADTs”)
Local Arterials ADTs
Active Transportation ADTs
Traffic Signals ADTs
Sewer Sewer Generation Rates (Gallons per Day )
Storm Drain Stormwater Acres
E.2 Persons Served
For many of the facilities considered in this Fee Study, service population (or Persons Served) will be used to allocate benefits among fee categories. For the purposes of this Fee Study, the Persons Served calculations are based on the number of residents per dwelling unit (i.e., persons per household) and the number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. generated by each land use class. Based on years of performing a variety of fiscal and economic impact studies and with experience in a variety of both public and private sectors, DTA has determined that utilizing a s ervice population, or Persons Served population, comprised of all residents and 50% of employees , is a common fiscal practice in quantifying the impact of a new development in each service area. This number suggests that a resident generally has twice the fiscal impact of an employee.

E.3 ADTs
Landscape Medians, Local Arterial Streets, Active Transportation and Traffic Signal Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number of ADTs generated by each land use. ADTs are published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (“ITE”) Publication Trips Generation, 1 1 th Edition. The ADT
generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units), per 1,000 square feet of building area for each category of non -residential development, and per room for hotels. Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single , one -directional person or vehicle movement in which either the origin or the destina tion is entered or exited inside a study site. In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip. For trip site generation, the focus is on the trips entering and exiting a single site. Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, within a 24 -hour weekday period, generated by a particular use or development .
1741
20 SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
E.4 Stormwater Runoff Coefficients
The methodology used to allocate drainage costs to future development is relative runoff contribution. Storm Drain Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the runoff rates, measured in terms of the relative contribution of runoff (i.e., the EBU factor - see Section V) generated by each land use. Specifically, the reasonable relationship used to allocate storm drain costs between existing, converted use, and future development is relative runoff contribution. The Ration al Method of computing runoff rates was used in the form of Q = C x I x A, where “Q” is equal to runoff volume, “C” is the ratio of area to total area studied, “I” is rainfall intensity, and “A” is Area, in acres of the Fee S tudy area. A runoff factor, “C” of 1.00, indicates a total site, where every drop of rain would find its way to the public streets as runoff. However, it can be shown that only the relative contribution of runoff needs to be considered when computing a unit of runoff (Q/A), where only the runoff factor and acreage are considered . This is the assumption used in this calculation.

Finally, a summary of the EDUs/EBUs applied in the Fee Study is presented in the table below.

Table 10 : EDUs/ EBUs
Facility Type EBU/EDU EBU/EDU Existing Projected Total
Public Facilities Persons Served EDU 71,717 25,200 96,917 Police Persons Served EDU 71,717 25,200 96,917
Fire Persons Served EDU 71,717 25,200 96,917
Library Persons Served EDU 58,993 20,462 79,455
Parks Persons Served EDU 910,344 324,853 1,235,197
Landscape Medians ADTs EBU 910,344 324,853 1,235,197
Local Arterials ADTs EBU 910,344 324,853 1,235,197
Active Trans. ADTs EBU 71,979 25,200 96,917
Traffic Signals ADTs EBU 71,919 25,200 96,917
Sewer 1
Sewer
Generation Rates
(Gallons per Day)
EBU 71,919 25,200 96,917
Storm Drain 1
Stormwater
Acres EBU 58,993 20,462 79,455
Note :

1. Sewer usage rates per gallon and storm drains used runoff coefficients to determine fee calculations, so this methodology dif fers from the projected EDU/EBUs presented in the other categories.

The following sections present the reasonable relationship of benefit, impact, and proportionality tests for each fee element (i.e., Public Facilities, Police , Fire, Library Parks , Landscape Medians, Local Arterials, Active Transportation, Traffic Signal , Sewer, and Storm Drain) as well as the analysis undertaken to apportion costs for each type of facility. More detailed fee calculation worksheets for each facility type are included in Appendix A.
1742
21 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

CALCULATION OF FEES
A Public Fac ilities
A.1 Public Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Public Facilities element includes the facilities necessary to provide basic governmental services and public facilities maintenance services , exclusive of public safety, throughout the City. The fees collected from the new development will be used exclusively for Public Facilities purposes. All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Public Facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. Thus, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the impact of residential and non -residential development. Table 11 below illustrates how the Public Facilities Fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the Fee, the types of development funded o r partially funded by Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for the facilities, and the proportionality requirements. The proposed DIF discussed in this section, if adopted, would be imposed, collected, and spent on the acquisition of land, construction of new public buildings, and expansion of existing City facilities to accommodate new growth.

Table 11 below illustrates how the Public Facilities Fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.
1743
22 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 11: Public Facilities Element
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct general facilities that will mitigate the
impacts of new residential and non -residential
development on the City’s general public facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Construction and replacement of new city hall
buildings, supporting general facilities, public works
office, libraries, garage facilitie s, vehicles, equipment , and parking facilities.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees, thus increasing the need for general
facilities and services. The equipment, vehicles,
buildings , and parking facilities used to provide these services will have to be expanded, constructed, or
purchased to meet this increased demand and
maintain the current LOS to the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional residents and employees from the new
development will impact the demand for general
administration facilities. New city hall buildings,
supporting government administrative facilities, public works offices, libraries, garage facilities, vehicles,
equipment, and parking facilities are needed to
mitigate the impacts of additional residents and
employees. If additional general facilities are not
constructed, general services for City residents and
employees will suffer.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

The general facilities fee is based on the cost of
providing new city hall buildings, supporting
government administration facilities, the public works
office, libraries, garage facilities , equipment, vehicles, field operations buildings, and parking facilities. The fee is based on the cost of providing new materials at
the same levels as provided to existing residents.

For Public Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 12 below summarizes the Needs List. The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1744
23 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 12: Public Facilities Costs
Public Facilities Facility Cost
Corporate Yard Expansion (Three phases of expansion) $30,000,000 Proposed Parking Structure (Omni Trans - 1,500 spaces) $70,000,000 City Hall Construction (Phase II) $10,000,000
Public Facilities Subtotal $110,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $1,915,624
Public Facilities Total $108,084,376
A.1 Offsetting Revenues
In calculating DIFs , it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the Public Facilities calculation total, as any existing account balance or other offsetting funds must be subtracted from the cost total. Currently, $1,915,624 is in the Public Facilities account and must be subtracted as offsetting revenue.

A.2 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section looks at the LOS for Public facilities to ensure that there will be sufficient system -wide capacity to accommodate new development
The list of projects to be built by the City details the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and outlines the criteria for designing a system to serve both existing and future development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

A.3 Calculation Methodology
The proposed Public Facilities projects are to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. To determine the Public Facilities Fees, DTA calculated the EDUs through 204 4 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City. Total current EDUs across all land uses were 77,717, with 22,781 projected EDUs. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A.

T he costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E DUs. As illustrated in Table 13 below , 73.99% of the costs will be allocated to existing development , and

26.01 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing 1745
24 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
development, $28,103,305 of the planned public facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $79,981,071 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 13: Public Facilities Cost Allocation Summary 1
Development Type EDUs Percentage
Allocated Facility Cost Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 73.99 % $79,981,071
New Development 25,200 26.01 % $28,103,305
Total 96,917 100.00% $108,084,376
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Table 14, presented below, summarizes the EDU, calculated as the cost of new development ($ 28,103,305 ) divided by the projected 25,200 EDUs . When accounting for the anticipated growth from new development, the cost per EDU totals $ 1,115 as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total development to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 14: Public Facilities Cost per EDU 1
Public Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $28,103,305
Projected EDUs (New Development) 25,200
Cost per E DU $1,115
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

A.4 Public Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

T he residential Fee per Sq. Ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU ($1,115) by the total number of residential EDUs ( 25,200 ), resulting in a total amount funded from residential property of $ 28,103,305 . This result was then divided by the total projected residential square footage (39,912,787) , yielding a per-square -foot fee of $ 0.57. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below . 1746
25 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 15: Residential Public Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per
Unit Number of Projected Units Conversion Formula Total EDUs Residential 1.00 20,462 20,462
Total Residential 20,462 a 20,462
Total cost per EDU b $1,115
Total Fees c = a * b $22,819,869
Total Residential Sq. Ft. d 39,912,787
Total cost per Residential Sq. Ft. e = c/d $0. 57
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, the Non -Residential Fee per 1,000 sq. ft . was calculated by multiplying the per- EDU cost of $ 1,115 by the total number of non -residential EDUs applicable to each land use type. Table 16, shown below, summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 sq. ft . and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 16: Non -Residential Public Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per 1,000 Non -
Res. Sq. Ft.

Fee per 1,000 Non -
Res Sq. Ft.

Rooms /
Non - Res. Sq. Ft.

Costs Financed by
Fees
a b = ax c [e] = ([c] /1,000) x [b]
Commercial 0.38 $422 6,893,730 $2,911,093
Industrial 0.10 $115 20,599,049 $2,373,343
Total Costs $5,283,436
A.5 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Public Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 17 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 17: Public Facilities C osts Financed by Fee Summary per Land Use Category Land Type
Residential /
Non -Residential Fee
per 1,000 SF /Room
Number of Projected
Res SF /Non - Res
SF /Rooms
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.5 7 39,912,787 $22,819,869
Commercial Retail $422 $6,893,730 $2,911,093
Industrial $115 $20,599,049 $2,373,343
Total $28,103,305
City Publi c Facilities DIFs for both residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Table 18 below . 1747
26 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 18: Public Facilities DIF Summary (Maximum Supportable Fees) Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.5 7
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.4 2
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.12
A.6 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1748
27 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
B Police
B.1 Police Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Police Fac ilities element includes those facilities used by the City Police Department to maintain police services . Th e fees collected from the new development will be used exclusively for Police Department purposes . All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Police Department facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth . The facilities, equipment, and vehicles used to provide these services will have to be purchased or replaced to meet this increased demand .

Thus, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for Police Facilities and the impact of residential and non -residential development .

Table 19 below illustrates how the police fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.
1749
28 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 19: Police Facilities Element
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
acquire vehicles, property , and equipment, and
additional facilities that will mitigate the impacts of new residential and non -residential development on
the City’s Police facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Acquisition of additional police headquarters, police
vehicles, property , and equipment.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees, thus increasing the need for trained
police personnel. Buildings, v ehicles, property , and
equipment used to provide these services will have to
be purchased to meet this increased demand and
maintain the same LOS as the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional residents and employees from the
new development will impact on the demand for
police vehicles, property, and equipment. New Police
headquarters, vehicles , and equipment are needed to
mitigate the impact of the additional residents and
employees. If additional buildings, vehicles , and
equipment are not acquired, then overall public
safety in the City will suffer.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the
amount of the Fee and the cost
of the public facility.

The police fee is based on the cost of providing new
buildings, vehicles, property, equipment, and
additional facilities. The fee is based on the cost of
providing new materials at the same levels as
provided to existing residents.

For Police Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 20 below summarizes the Needs List. The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1750
29 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 20 : Police Facilities Costs
Police Facilities Facility Cost
Police Department - 12,000 sq ft. with furniture and fixtures ($3,300/sq ft) $40,000,000 Police Department Secure Parking Structure $40,000,000
Police Sub Station - North end of town, 2,000 sq ft $5,000,000 Police Hangar for Helicopter storage $6,000,00 0
Command Post 50 ft motor home, increase the size $650,000 Police Black & White Vehicles - Fleet increase 1 vehicle per 3 officers (30 officers) $1,000,000
Armored Vehicle $400,000
Helicopter (need; the existing one doesn't work) $5,000,000 Motorcycles ($45,000 each x 10) $450,000
Police Substation (Metrolink) $10,000,000
Police Facilities Subtotal $108,500,000
Offsetting Revenues $4,079,433
Police Facilities Total $104,420,567
B.2 Offse tting Revenues
In calculating DIFs , it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the Police Facilities calculation total, as any existing account balance or other offsetting funds must be subtracted from the cost total. Currently, $4,079,433 is in the Police Facilities account and must be subtracted as offsetting revenue.

B.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section looks at the LOS for Police facilities to ensure that there will be sufficient system -wide capacity to accommodate new development
The list of projects to be built by the City details the planned facilities necessary to provide the required Police services and outlines the criteria for designing a system to serve both existing and future development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

B.4 Calculation Methodology
The proposed Police Facilities projects are to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. To determine the Police Fees, DTA calculated the 1751
30 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
EDUs through 204 4 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City . Total current EDUs across all land uses were 71,717, with 28,974 projected EDUs. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A .

T he costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E DUs. As illustrated in Table 21 below , 73.99% of the costs will be allocated to existing development , and

26.01 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $27,150,668 of the planned Police facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $77,269,899 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 21: Police Cost Allocation Summary 1
Development Type EDUs 2 Percentage
Allocated Facility Cost Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 73.99 % $77,269,899
New Development 25,200 26.01 % $27,150,668
Total 96,917 100.00% $104,420,567
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Table 22, presented below, summarizes the EDU, calculated as the cost of new development ($ 27,150,668 ) divided by the projected 25,200 EDUs . When accounting for anticipated growth from new development, the cost per EDU is $1,077, as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total development to determine the proposed Fee.

Table 22 : Police Cost per EDU 1
Proposed Police Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $27,150,668
Projected EDUs (New Development) 25,200
Cost per E DU $1,0 77
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

B.5 Police Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

T he residential Fee per Sq. Ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU 1752
31 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
($1,0 77) by the total number of residential EDUs ( 20,462 ), resulting in a total amount funded from residential property of $ 22,046,328 . This result was then divided by the total projected residential square footage (39,912,787) , yielding a per-square -foot fee of $ 0.55. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below .

Table 23 : Police Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per Unit Number of Projected
Units
Conversion
Formula T otal EDUs
Residential 1.00 20,462 20,462
Total Residential 20,462 a 20,462
Total cost per EDU b $1,077
Total Fees c = a * b $22,046,328
Total Residential Sq. Ft. d 39,912,787
Total cost per Residential Sq. Ft. e = c/d $0. 55
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, the Non -Residential Fee per 1,000 sq. ft . was calculated by multiplying the per- EDU cost of $ 1,077 by the total number of non -residential EDUs applicable to each land use type. Table 24 , shown below, summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 sq. ft . and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 24 : Non -Residential Police Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per 1,000 Non -
Res. Sq. Ft.

Fee per 1,000 Non -
Res Sq. Ft.

Rooms /
Non - Res. Sq. Ft.

Costs Financed by
Fees
a b = ax c [e] = ([c] /1,000) x [b]
Commercial 0.38 $408 6,893,730 $2,812,414
Industrial 0.10 $107 20,599,049 $2,291,926
Total Costs $5,104,340
B.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Public Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 25 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development , subject to the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 25 : Police Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Land Use Category Land Type
Residential /Non -
Residential Fee per
1,000 SF /Room
Number of Projected
Res SF /Non - Res
SF /Rooms
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.5 5 39,912,787 $22,046,328
Commercial Retail $408 6,893,730 $2,812,414
Industrial $111 20,599,049 $2,291,926
1753
32 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Total $27,150,668
City Police Facilities DIFs for both residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Table 26 below .

Table 26 : Police DIF Summary (Maximum Supportable Fees) Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.5 5
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.41
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.11
B.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1754
33 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
C Fire DIFs
C.1 Fire Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Fire Facilities element includes those facilities used by the City to maintain Fire services. The Fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for Fire Department purposes. All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Fire Department facilities a nd creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. The facilities, equipment, and vehicles used to provide these services will have to be purchased or replaced to meet this i ncreased demand. Thus, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for Fire Facilities and the impact of residential and non -residential development.

Table 27 below illustrates how the fire fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the Fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.
1755
34 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 27: Fire Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct , expand , or enhance fire facilities, acquire equipment , property, and a variety of specialized fire and emergency vehicles that will mitigate the impacts
of new residential and non -residential development
on the City’s Fire facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Expansion/construction/acquisition of fire facilities,
purchase of property and equipment, and vehicles.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees, thus increasing the need for trained fire
personnel. Buildings will need to be expanded or
enhanced , and property , equipment, and vehicles
used to provide these services will have to be
purchased to meet this increased demand and
maintain the current LOS to the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional residents and employees from the new
development will impact demand for fire facilities.

New, expanded, or enhanced f ire facilities , along with additional vehicles and equipment, would be needed
to mitigate the impact of the increased number of
residents and employees. If fire facilities are not
constructed , expanded, or enhanced, and equipment
and vehicles are not acquired, then the overall LOS of
public safety in the City w ould suffer.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

The Fire Fee is based on the cost of expanding or
enhancing facilities and purchasing property,
equipment, and vehicles at the same levels provided
to existing residents.

For Fire Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 28 below summarizes the Needs List. The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1756
35 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 28 : Fire Facilities Costs
Fire Facilities Facility Cost
Station 77 Expansion to the neighboring lot, including apparatus bays and dorm rooms. $5,000,000
Construction of the Phase 2 station 80 fire station, once development begins in the Westgate Specific Plan area $15,000,000
Two High - End Ladder Fire Trucks $2 mil each, total $4 mil $4,000,000 Purchase a Firecat Swat Vehicle for firefighting $1,000,000 Fire Facilities Subtotal $25,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $0
Fire Facilities Total $25,000,000
C.2 Offsetting Revenues
In calculating DIFs , it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the Fire Facilities calculation total, as any existing account balance or other offsetting funds must be subtracted from the cost total. Currently, there is no balance in the current Fire Facilities account that must be subtracted as offsetting revenue.

C.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section looks at the LOS for Fire facilities to ensure that there will be sufficient system -wide capacity to accommodate new development
The list of projects to be built by the City details the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and outlines the criteria for designing a system to serve both existing and future development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as those required to serve both new and existing development, and therefore any increase in LOS beyond the current LOS would be necessary to meet the plan approved by the City .

C.4 Calculation Methodology
The proposed Fire Department Facilities projects are to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. To determine the Fire Fees, DTA calculated the EDUs through 204 4 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City . Total current EDUs across all land uses were 71,717, with 25,200 projected EDUs. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A .

T he costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new 1757
36 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E DUs. As illustrated in Table 29 below , 73.99% of the costs will be allocated to existing development , and

26.01 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $7,193,738 of the planned Fire facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $18,499,684 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 29 : Fire Cost Allocation Summary 1
Development Type EDUs 2 Percentage
Allocated Facility Cost Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 73.99 % $18,499,684
New Development 25,200 26.01 % $6,500,316
Total 96,917 100.00% $25,000,000
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Table 30, presented below, summarizes the EDU, calculated as the cost of new development ($ 6,500,316 ) divided by the projected 25,200 EDUs . When accounting for the anticipated growth from new development, the cost per EDU totals $ 258 as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total development to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 30 : Fire Cost per EDU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $6,500,316
Projected EDUs (New Development) 25,200
Cost per E DU $258
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

C.5 Fire Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

T he residential Fee per Sq. Ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU ($2 58) by the total number of residential EDUs ( 20,462 ), resulting in a total amount funded from residential property of $ 5,727,253 . This result was then divided by the total projected residential square footage (39,912,787) , yielding a per -square -foot fee of $0.13. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below . 1758
37 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 31: Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per Unit Number of
Projected Units
Conversion
Formula T otal EDUs
Residential 1.00 20,462 20,462
Total Residential 20,462 a 20,462
Total cost per EDU b $258
Total Fees c = a * b $5, 278 ,253
Total Residential Sq. Ft. d 39,912,787
Total cost per Residential Sq. Ft. e = c/d $0.13
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, the Non -Residential Fee per 1,000 sq. ft . was calculated by multiplying the per- EDU cost of $ 258 by the total number of non -residential EDUs applicable to each land use type. Table 32, shown below, summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 sq. ft . and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 32 : Non - Residential Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per 1,000 Non -
Res. Sq. Ft.

Fee per 1,000 Non -
Res Sq. Ft.

Rooms /
Non - Res. Sq. Ft.

Costs Financed by
Fees
a b = ax c [e] = ([c] /1,000) x [b]
Commercial 0.38 $98 6,893,730 $673,338
Industrial 0.10 $27 20,599,049 $548,725
Total Costs $1,222,063
C.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Fire Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 33 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 33: Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Land Use Category Land Type
Residential /Non -
Residential Fee per
1,000 SF /Room
Number of Projected
Res SF /Non - Res
SF /Rooms
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.13 39,912,787 $5,278,253
Commercial Retail $98 6,893,730 $673,338
Industrial $27 20,599,049 $548,725
Total $6,500,316
City Fire Facilities DIFs for both residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Table 34 below 1759
38 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 34 : Fire DIF Summary (Maximum Supportable Fees)
Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.13
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.10
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.03
C.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1760
39 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
D Library DIFs
D.1 Library Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Library Facilities element includes facilities used by the City Library Department to maintain Library services, such as facility modernization, infrastructure upgrades, and building system improvements necessary to sustain the City’s adopted library service levels as the community grows . Costs allocated to new development are limited to the proportion attributable to growth and increased demand generated by future residents and businesses . Th e fees collected from the new development will be used exclusively for Library Department purposes. All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Library Department facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth . The facilities in this section are defined as buildin gs, land, vehicles, property, and equipment; basically, any capital asset with a life of 5 years or longer. The proposed DIF discussed in this section, if adopted, would be imposed, collected, and spent on the acquisition of land, construction, and expansion of existing City facilities to accommodate new growth. The fees collected from the new deve lopment will be used exclusively for Library Department purposes. All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of devel opment on Library facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. The Library element includes the facilities necessary to provide basic Library services and facilities services throughout the City.

Table 35 below illustrates how the Library Fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of fees, the type of development on which the Fee is imposed, a reasonable relationship to the need for collection items, and proportionality requirements.
1761
40 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 35 : Library Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
acquire/construct new library facilities and buildings, remodel/refurbish existing facilities and buildings,
vehicles, property , and equipment, and acquire various library collection items that will mitigate the impacts of new residential development on the City’s Library
facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Construction /expansion of new library facilities,
remodel/refurbishment of existing facilities, and the
purchase of vehicles and equipment
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential development in the City will generate
additional residents who will become library patrons.

In addition to equipment , property, and vehicles, new
facilities will need to be acquired/constructed; existing facilities will need to be remodeled/ refurbished or
expanded; and collections will have to be expanded to
meet this increased demand. Fees collected from new
residential development will be used for the
acquisition/construction of new facilities, the
remodeling or refurbishment of existing facilities, and the purchase of vehicles and equipment to maintain
the City's current LOS .
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional residents from the new development
will affect demand for library space and library
collections . New facility space will need to be
expanded or acquired/constructed , and existing facility space will need to be remodeled/refurbished. If
additional facilities are not acquired/constructed, and vehicles and equipment are not purchased, then the
overall LOS in the City would suffer.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

The library fee is based on the cost to provide new
facilities, property , equipment, and vehicles. The fee is based on the cost of providing new materials at the
same levels as provided to existing residents.

For Library Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 36 below summarizes the Needs List. The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1762
41 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 36 : Library Facilities Costs
Library Facilities Facility Cost
Library Facility Modernization and Expansion $1,004,936 Facility Improvements and Reconfiguration $797,568
Site Circulation $103,684
Technology, Infrastructure, and Building
enhancements $7,178,112
Growth -servicing library facilities $311,052
Library Facilities Subtotal $9,395,351
Offsetting Revenues $1,464,571
Library Facilities Total $7,930,780
D.2 Offsetting Revenues
In calculating DIFs , it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the Fire Facilities calculation total, as any existing account balance or other offsetting funds must be subtracted from the cost total. Currently, $1,464,571 is in the Library Facilities account and must be subtracted as offsetting revenue.

D.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section looks at the LOS for Library facilities to ensure that there will be sufficient syste m-wide capacity to accommodate new development The list of projects to be built by the City details the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and outlines the criteria for designing a system to serve both existing and future development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

D.4 Calculation Methodology
The proposed Library Facilities projects are to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. To determine the Library Fees, DTA calculated the EDUs through 204 4 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City . Total current EDUs across all land uses were 71,717, with 25,200 projected EDUs. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A . 1763
42 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
T he costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E DUs. As illustrated in Table 37 below , 73.99 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development , and

26.01 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $2,062,103 of the planned Library facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $5,868,677 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 37: Library Cost Allocation Summary 1
Development Type EDUs 2 Percentage
Allocated Facility Cost Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 73.99 % $5,868,677
New Development 25,200 26.01 % $2,062,103
Total 96,917 100.00% $7,930,780
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Table 38, presented below, summarizes the EDU, calculated as the cost of new development ($2, 062,103 ) divided by the projected 25,200 EDUs . When accounting for anticipated growth from new development, the cost per EDU is $82, as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total development to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 38 : Library Cost per EDU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $2,062,103
Projected EDUs (New Development) 25,200
Cost per E DU $82
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

D.5 Library Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

T he residential Fee per Sq. The ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU ($82 ) by the total number of residential EDUs ( 20,462 ), resulting in a total amount funded from residential property of $ 1,674,427 . This result was then divided by the total projected residential square footage (39,912,787) , yielding a per-square -foot fee of $ 0.04 . Details of this calculation are shown in the table below . 1764
43 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 39 : Library Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per Unit Number of Projected
Units
Conversion
Formula Total EDUs
Residential 1.00 20,462 20,462
Total Residential 20,462 a 20,462
Total cost per EDU b $82
Total Fees c = a * b $1,674,427
Total Residential Sq. Ft. d 39,912,787
Total cost per Residential Sq. Ft. e = c/d $0.04
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, the Non -Residential Fee per 1,000 sq. ft . was calculated by multiplying the EDU cost of $ 82 by the total number of non -residential EDUs applicable to each land use type. Table 40, shown below, summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 sq. ft . and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 40 : Non -Residential Library Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per 1,000 Non -
Res. Sq. Ft.

Fee per 1,000 Non -
Res Sq. Ft.

Rooms/Non -
Res. Sq. Ft.

Costs Financed by
Fees
a b = ax c [e] = ([c]/1,000) x [b]
Commercial 0.38 $31 6,893,730 $213,604
Industrial 0.10 $8 20,599,049 $174,073
Total Costs $387,676
D.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Fire Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 41 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development , subject to the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 41: Library Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Land Use Category Land Type
Residential /Non -
Residential Fee per
1,000 SF /Room
Number of Projected
Res SF /Non - Res
SF /Rooms
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.04 39,912,787 $1,674,427
Commercial Retail $31 $6,893,730 $213,604
Industrial $8 $20,599,049 $174,073
Total $2, 062,103
City Library Facilities DIFs for both residential and non -residential development (using a per-square -foot metric) are summarized in Table 42 below . 1765
44 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 42 : Library DIF Summary (Maximum Supportable Fees) Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.04
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.03
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.01
D.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1766
45 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
E Park s and Recreation DIFs
E.1 Park s and Recreation Development Facilities Fees (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Park s Development Facilities element will serve Fontana residents by providing recreational facilities while enhancing the community’s appeal and quality of life.

The facilities described in this section include Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks. The Fee Study includes a component for the development of new park facilities to serve the City's new residential development through 204 4. This fee section covers park improvements, land acquisition, and park s and recreation renovation. In contrast to the fees covered earlier in this Fee Study, non -resi dential development will be excluded from the fee calculation.

According to the City’s General Plan, in addition to improving the overall quality of life for residents, excellent park programs are important for the well -being of a city's business community. Not only do parks make the community more attractive to residents (providing a stronger market base for local businesses), but they can also directly influence a city's fiscal base by attracting commercial and industrial businesses.

Table 43 below illustrates how the Parks Fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the Fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.
1767
46 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 43 : Parks and Recreation Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
acquire land and construct parks and recreation
facilities, senior centers, trail facilities, vehicles , and equipment that will mitigate the impacts of new
residential development on the City’s Parks and
recreation facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Acquisition of land and development of parks and
recreation facilities, the construction of senior
centers , vehicles, and equipment.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential development in the City will generate
additional residents, thereby increasing the need for
parks and recreational facilities. Park and recreational facilities and community centers, along with vehicles
and equipment used to provide these services , will
have to be expanded or constructed to meet this
increased demand and maintain the same LOS to the
City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional residents from the new development
will impact demand for parks and recreational
facilities. New parks , recreational facilities, and senior centers are needed to mitigate the impact of the
additional residents. If additional park and recreation facilities are not constructed, the LOS will decline, and the overall quality of life for City residents will suffer. 66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

The parks and recreation facilities fee is based on the cost of providing park and recreation facilities, land, vehicles , equipment, and community centers. The fee
is based on the cost of providing new materials at the
same levels as those provided to existing residents.

For Park Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 44 below summarizes the Needs List. The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1768
47 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 44 : Parks and Recreation Facilities Costs
Parks Facilities Facility Cost
New South Fontana Community Center (Don Day) $35,000,000 Park Improvements $35,000,000
Recreational Trails $35,000,000
Sports Park $30,000,000
New Community Center in the Core of the City (Miller) $30,000,000 Action Park $7,500,000
Security Camera Upgrades $6,500,000
Action Park – Martin Tudor 10,000,000
Miller Amphitheater $15,000,000
Parks Facilities Subtotal $204,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $9,323,185
Parks Facilities Total $194,676,815
E.2 Offs etting Revenues
When calculating DIFs, it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the total for the Fire Facilities calculation , as any existing account balance or other offsetting funds must be subtracted from the cost total. Currently, $9,323,185 is in the Parks Facilities account and must be subtracted as offsetting revenue.

E.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section looks at the LOS for Parks and Recreation facilities to ensure that there will be suf ficient system -wide capacity to accommodate new development The list of Parks projects to be built by the City details the planned facilities necessary to provide the required services to the City and outlines the criteria used to design a system that serves both existing and future development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as those required to serve both new and existing development, and therefore any increase in LOS beyond the current LOS would be necessary to meet the plan approved by the City .

E.4 Calculation Methodology
The proposed Park Facilities projects are to meet the needs of both existing and future residents. To determine the Parks Fees, DTA calculated the EDUs through 204 4 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City . 1769
48 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Total current EDUs for all land uses were determined to be 58,993, with 20,462 projected EDUs. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A .

T he costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E DUs. As illustrated in Table 45 below , 74.25 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development , and

25.75 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $50,135,039 of the planned Park facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $144,541,776 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 45 : Parks and Recreation Cost Allocation Summary 1 Development Type EDUs 2 Percentage
Allocated Facility Cost Allocated
Existing Development 58,993 74.25% $144,541,776
New Development 20,462 25.75% $50,135,039
Total 79,455 100.00% $194,676,815
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

Table 46, presented below, summarizes the EDU, calculated as the cost of new development ($50,135,039) divided by the projected 20,462 EDUs . When accounting for the anticipated growth from new development, the cost per EDU totals $ 2,450 as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total development to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 46 : Parks and Recreation Cost per EDU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $50,135,039
Projected EDUs (New Development) 20,462
Cost per E DU $2,450
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

E.5 Park and Recreation Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
1770
49 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
The residential Fee per sq. ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per EDU of $2,450 by the total number of residential EDUs ( 20,462 ), resulting in a total amount funded from residential property of $ 50,135,039 . This result was then divided by the total projected residential square footage (39,912,787) to yield a fee per square foot of $ 1.26 . Details of this calculation are shown in the table below .

Table 47: Parks and Recreation Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary 1 Land Type EDUs per Unit Number of Projected
Units
Conversion
Formula T otal EDUs
Residential 1.00 20,462 20,462
Total Residential 20,462 a 20,462
Total cost per EDU b $2,450
Total Fees c = a * b $50,135,039
Total Residential Sq. Ft. d 39,912,787
Total cost per Residential Sq. Ft. e = c/d $1.26
Note :

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

E.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Fire Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 48 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 48 : Parks and Recreation DIF Summary (Maximum Supportable Fees) Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $1.26
E.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1771
50 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
F Landscape Medians
F.1 Landscape Medians Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The City ’s goal is to improve the street s on a prioritized list over the build -out horizon. Improvements for e ach street will focus on Landscape Medians . This additional infrastructure support is necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular access throughout the City. The proposed DIF is to help meet the transportation demand of new development through 204 4. The City identified the need for the landscape median infrastructure and equipment, as described in Table 49 below.

The DIF will provide the City with revenue to fund the acquisition, installation, and construction of necessary transportation facilities, which, in turn, will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of existing and future residents and employees.

The table below illustrates how the transportation fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding use of fees, type of development funded or partially funded by the Fee revenue, reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and proportionality requirements
1772
51 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 49 : Landscape Medians Facilities Nexus Requirement AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various Landscape Median projects and
other infrastructure that will mitigate the impacts of
new development on the City's transportation system.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Fund or partially fund the construction of landscape
medians and other infrastructure projects within the
City limits.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development will
generate additional traffic on City streets. The Fee
revenue will be used to construct new landscape
median projects that new residents and employees
will travel on . A Fee imposed on new residential and
non -residential development is a reasonable method
for mitigating the impacts of such development and
any resulting increase in LOS above and beyond the
current LOS required to meet the plan approved by
the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional traffic volumes generated by the new
development will affect current congestion levels .

New landscape medians and other infrastructure are
needed to mitigate the impacts of the increased traffic volumes. If the proposed projects are not constructed
in concert with new development, the City's
transportation system will experience higher traffic
volumes , increasing congestion to a level well below
City standards.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

Project costs are allocated to new development based
on the percentage of total traffic volume at build -out generated by new development . The specific fee
imposed on various land uses is based on the relative
trip - generation rate compared with a residential unit (the baseline rate, or EDU factor).

Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any DIF program. In the broadest sense, the purpose of impact fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing adequate public facilities. Notably, for Landscape Median Facilities, t he City provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on th e Needs List.
1773
52 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 50 below summarizes the Landscape Median Needs List . The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table 50 : Landscape Median Facilities Costs
Landscape Median Facilities Facility Cost
S Highland Ave - 600' Past Citrus to Auto Center Drive Heading East: Construct Raised Landscape Median $2,400,000
Valley Blvd. from Bananah Ave. to Cherry Ave. $1,500,000 Mulberry Ave. from Santa Ana Ave. to Slover Ave. $1,500,000 Arrow Blvd. from Citrus Ave. to Jurupa Ave. $2,400,000
Arrow Blvd. from Palmetto Ave. to Alder Ave. $1,500,000 Slover Ave. from Jasmine St to Sierra Ave $14,889,600
Beech Ave. from Slover to Jurupa Ave. $3,168,000
Beech Ave. from Baseline Ave. to Miller Ave. $1,500,000 Beech Ave. from PE Trail to Foothill Blvd $630,000
Sierra Lakes from San Sevaine to Beach $1,560,000
Sierra Lakes from Lytle Creek to Catawba $1,560,000
Transportation Facilities Subtotal $32,607,600
Offsetting Revenue $848,043
Total $31,759,557
F.2 Offsetting Revenues
According to City Staff, offsetting revenues need to be considered in total for the Landscape Medians Facilities calculation . As of the end of September 2025 , the City had $ 848,043 in its current Landscape Medians Facilities account that needed to be subtracted from the total facilities cost, as indicated in Table 50 above.

F.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

LOS for streets and intersections is commonly defined in terms of LOS (LOS) categories A through F as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board . LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors , including speed, travel time, delay , and freedom to maneuver. Six levels of LOS are typically defined, ranging from LOS A , representing completely free - flow conditions, to LOS F, representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop - and - go conditions. LOS E represented operations at or near capacity, an unstable level where vehicles operate with the minimum spacing required to maintain uniform flow.

The City’s Landscape Medians facilities built to date are consistent with the existing 1774
53 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
LOS required by the City to meet the population's needs . The list of projects to be built by the City ( presented in detail in Appendix B of this Fee Study) outlines the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and the criteria used to design a system to serve both existing and future development. The portion of the fee associated with existing transportation facilities reflects the current LOS that would be applied to new development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

F.4 Calculation Methodology
Landscape Median Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number of ADTs. ADTs are published by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11
th Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units), per 1,000 square feet of building area for each category of non -residential development, and per room for hotels. Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single , one - directional movement of a person or vehicle in which either the origin or the destination is at or enters a study site. In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip.

For trip site generation, the focus is on the trips entering and exiting a single site.

Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound , within a 24 -hour weekday period, generated by a particular use or development.

All proposed Landscape Medians facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out EBUs. As illustrated in Table 5 1 below, 73.70 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development, and 26.30 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development , $8,352,665 of the $31,759,557 in Landsc ape Medians facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development . The rem ain ing amount must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.

Table 51: Landscape Median Facilities Cost Allocation Summary Development Type ADTs (EBUs) Percentage Allocated Facility Cost Allocation Existing Development 910,344 73.70 % $23,406,892
New Development 324,853 26.30 % $8,352,665
Total 1,253,197 100.00% $31,759,557
1775
54 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
To calculate the Fee s, DTA determined the number of AD Ts expected through 204 4 based on the expected residential and non -residential growth in the City. The analysis estimates that up to 324,853 additional ADTs would be generated by land use growth, as detailed in Table 52 below.

Table 52 : Landscape Medians Number of Trip Calculations Land Use Type
Projected
Development
(Units)
Projected
Development
(Sq. Ft.)
ADT Generation
Rate 1
Total ADTs
(EBUs) 2
Residential 20,462 5.64 115,406
Commercial 6,893,730 15.28 105,319
Industrial 20,599,049 5.06 104,128
Total 324,853
Note s:

1. Projected AD Ts per unit for residential and per 1,000 Square Feet for non -residential.

2. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Table 53, presented below, summarizes the cost per ADT, calculated by dividing the cost of new development ($ 8,352,665 ) by the number of ADTs generated by new development ( 324,853 ). When accounting for the 324,583 planned AD Ts in the City, the cost per PHT totals $ 26 as shown in the table below. Th e cost per AD T of $ 26 was then applied to the various land uses and their respective AD T trip generation rates to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 53 : Landscape Medians Cost per EBU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $8,352,665
Total ADTs Added by New Development 324,853
DIF Cost Per ADT $26
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

F.5 Landscape Medians Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.

The residential fee per sq. ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per E DU of $ 26 by the total number of residential E BUs ( 115,406 ), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $ 2,967,330 . This result was then divided by the 1776
55 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
total anticipated residential square footage of 39,912,787 , yielding a fee per square foot of $ 0.0 7. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below .

Table 54 : Residential Landscape Median Costs Financed by Fee s per Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type ADT s per Unit Number of
Projected Units Calculation Total EDUs
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Total Residential 20,462 [a] 115,406
Total Cost per EDU [b] $26
Total Fees [c] = [a] x [b] $2,967,330
Total Residential Sq. Ft. [d] 39,912,787
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft. [e] = [c]/[d] $0.07
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, t he non -residential f ee per sq. ft. was calculated by multiplying the cost per EBU ($2 6) by the total number of non -residential EBUs applicable to each land -use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 55 : Non -Residential Landscape Median Facilities Costs Financed by Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type EBUs per
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. 1
Non -Residential
Fee per 1,000 SF.

Number of
Projected
Non -Res. SF
Costs Financed
by Fees
[a] [b] = [a] x $26 [c] [e] = [c] x [b]
Commercial 15.28 $393 6,893,730 $2,707,976
Industrial 5.06 $130 20,599,049 $2,677,359
Total $5,385,334
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

F.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Landscape Medians Facilities Fee calculation is presented in Table 56 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non - residential development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq . Landscape Medians Facilities DIFs for residential and non - residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized below . 1777
56 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 56 : Landscape Medians Facilities Costs Financed by Fee s Summary per Land Use Category Land Use Type
Residential Fee per
Sq. Ft./ per 1,000
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.

Number of Projected
Units /
Non -Res. Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.07 20,462 $2,967,330
Commercial $353 6,893,730 $2,707,976
Industrial $130 20,599,049 $2,677,359
Total $8,352,665
Table 57 : Landscape Median Fee Summary
Land Use Fees
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.) $0.07
Commercial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.3 9
Industrial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.13
F.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1778
57 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
G Local Arterials
G.1 Local Arterials Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The City’s goal is to improve the street s on a prioritized list over the build -out horizon. Improvements for e ach street will focus on Local Arterials. This additional infrastructure support is necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular access throughout the City. The proposed DIF is to help meet the transportation demand of new development through 204 4. The City identified the need for the landscape median infrastructure and equipment, as described in Table 58 below.

The DIF will provide the City with revenue to fund the acquisition, installation, and construction of the necessary arterial transportation facilities, which in turn will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of existing and future residents and employees.

The table below illustrates how the Local Arterials fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 with regard to the use of fees, the type of development funded or partially funded by the Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements .
1779
58 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 58 : Local Arterials Medians Facilities Nexus Requirement AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various transp ortation projects , including
local arterials , and other infrastructure that will
mitigate the impacts of new development on the
City's transportation system.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Fund or partially fund the construction of local
arterials and other infrastructure projects within the
City limits.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development will
generate additional traffic on City streets. The Fee
revenue will be used to construct new local arterial
projects that new residents and employees will use . A
Fee imposed on new residential and non -residential
development is a reasonable method for mitigating
the impacts of such development and any resulting
increase in LOS above and beyond the current LOS
required to meet the plan approved by the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional traffic volumes generated by new
development will affect current congestion levels .

New local arterials and other infrastructure are
needed to mitigate the impacts of the increased traffic volumes. If the proposed projects are not constructed
in concert with new development, the City's
transportation system will experience higher traffic
volumes , increasing congestion to a level well below
City standards.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

Project costs are allocated to new development based
on the percentage of total traffic volume at build -out generated by new development . The specific fee
imposed on various land uses is based on the relative
trip - generation rate compared to that of a residential unit (the baseline rate, or EDU factor).

Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any DIF program. In the broadest sense, the purpose of impact fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing adequate public facilities . Notably, for Local Arterial Facilities, the City provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List.

Table 59 below summarizes the Local Arterials Needs List . The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
1780
59 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 59 : Local Arterial Facilities Costs
Local Arterials Facilities Facility Cost
Alder Ave - from 650 feet north of Miller Ave to Miller Ave $338,000 Alder Ave - from 460 feet south of Marygold Ave to Valley Blvd (West Side) $405,600
Fontana Ave from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $5,168,000
Fontana Ave from Poplar Ave to San Bernardino Ave $3,600,000 Fontana Ave from San Bernardino Ave to Valley Ave $4,586,000 Knox Ave - from Sierra Lakes Pkwy to S. Highland Ave $2,448,000 Locust Ave - from San Jacinto to 320 feet north of Miller Ave $496,400 Locust Ave - from Miller Ave to Foothill Blvd $1,346,400 Locust Ave - from Foothill Blvd to 275 feet north of PE Trail $3,300,000 Locust Ave - from Arrow Blvd to Metrolink RR $1,950,000 Locust Ave - from Metrolink RR to Merrill Ave $770,000
Locust Ave - from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $4,080,000 Miller Ave - Date Ave to Cypress Ave $306,000
Miller Ave - 230 feet west of Laurel Ave to Laurel Ave $156,400 Miller Ave - 150 feet east of Laurel Ave to Texas Way $210,000 Miller Ave - Locust Ave to Maple Ave $980,000
Randall Ave. from Lime Ave. to Fontana Ave. $2,590,000
Randall Ave from Laurel Ave to Locust Ave (North side) $1,280,000 Randall Ave from 650 feet east of Locust Ave to Maple Ave (North side) $650,000 Valley Blvd. Banana to Almond $1,088,000
Transportation Facilities Subtotal $35,748,800
Offsetting Revenue $97,229
Total $35,651,571
G.2 Offsetting Revenues
According to City Staff, offsetting revenues need to be considered in total for the Local Arterials Facilities calculation . As of the end of September 2025 , the City had $97,229 in its current Local Arterials Facilities account that needed to be subtracted from the total facilities cost, as indicated in Table 59 above.

G.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

LOS for streets and intersections is commonly defined in terms of LOS categories A through F as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board . LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based 1781
60 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
on several factors , including speed, travel time, delay , and freedom to maneuver. Six levels of LOS are typically defined, ranging from LOS A , representing completely free - flow conditions, to LOS F, representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop - and - go conditions. LOS E represented operations at or near capacity, an unstable level where vehicles operate with the minimum spacing required to maintain uniform flow.

The City’s Local Arterials facilities built to date are consistent with the existing LOS required by the City to meet population needs . The list of projects to be built by the City ( presented in detail in Appendix B of this Fee Study) outlines the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and the criteria used to design a system to serve both existing and future development. The portion of the fee associated with existing transportation facilities reflects the current LOS that would be applied to new development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

G.4 Calculation Methodology
Local Arterials Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number of ADT. ADTs are published by the ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11 th Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units), per 1,000 square feet of building area for each category of non -residential development, and per room for hotels. Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single , one - directional movement of a person or vehicle in which either the origin or the destination is entered or exited. inside a study site. In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip. For trip site generation, the focus is on the trips entering and exiting a single site. Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, generated by a particular use or development within a 24 -hour weekday period .

All proposed Local Arterial facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E BUs. As illustrated in Table 6 0 below, 73.70 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development, and 26.30 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $9,376,253 of the $26,274,318 in Local Art erial facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining amount must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.
1782
61 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 60 : Local Arterials Facilities Cost Allocation Summary Development Type ADTs (EBUs) Percentage Allocated Facility Cost Allocation Existing Development 910,344 73.70 % $26,275,318
New Development 324,853 26,30 % $9,376,253
Total 1,235,197 100.00% $35,651,571
To calculate the Fee s, DTA determined the number of AD Ts expected through 204 4 based on the expected residential and non -residential growth in the City. The analysis estimates that up to 464,956 additional ADTs would be generated by land - use growth, as detailed in Table 61 below.

Table 61: Local Arterials Number of Trip Calculations
Land Use Type
Projected
Development
(Units)
Projected
Development
(Sq. Ft.)
ADT Generation
Rate 1
Total ADTs
(EBUs) 2
Residential 20,462 5.64 115,406
Commercial 6,893,730 15.28 105,319
Industrial 20,599,049 5.06 104,128
Total 324,853
Note s:

1. Projected AD Ts per unit for residential and per 1,000 Square Feet for non -residential.

2. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Table 62, presented below, summarizes the cost per ADT, calculated by dividing the cost of new development ($ 9,376,253 ) by the number of ADTs generated by new development ( 324,853 ). When accounting for the 324,853 planned ADTs in the City, the cost per PHT totals $ 29 as shown in the table below. Th e cost per ADT of $ 29 was then applied to the various land uses and their respective ADT trip generation rates to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 62 : Local Arterials Cost per EBU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $9,376,253
Total ADTs Added by New Development 324,853
DIF Cost Per ADT $2 9
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
1783
62 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
G.5 Local Arterials Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU of $ 29 by the total number of residential EBUs (115,406), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $ 3,330,965 . This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square footage of 39,912,787 , yielding a per-square -foot fee of $ 0.0 8. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.

Table 63 : Residential Local Arterials Costs Financed by Fee s per Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type ADT s per Unit Number of
Projected Units Calculation Total EDUs
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Total Residential 20,462 [a] 115,406
Total Cost per EDU [b] $29
Total Fees [c] = [a] x [b] $3,330,965
Total Residential Sq. Ft. [d] 39,912,787
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft. [e] = [c]/[d] $0.0 8 Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, t he non -residential f ee per sq. ft. was calculated by multiplying the cost per EBU ($2 9) by the total number of non -residential EBUs applicable to each land -use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.

Table 64 : Non -Residential Local Arterials Facilities Costs Financed by Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type EBUs per
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. 1
Non -Residential
Fee per 1,000 SF.

Number of
Projected
Non -Res. SF
Costs Financed
by Fees
[a] [b] = [a] x EBU [c] [e] = [c] x [b]
Commercial 15.28 $441 6,893,730 $30,039,829
Industrial 5.06 $146 20,599,049 $3,005,459
Total $6,045,288
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
1784
63 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
G.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed Local Arterial Facilities Fee is presented in Table 65 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq . Local Arterials Facilities DIFs for residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Tables 65 and 66 below .

Table 65 : Local Arterials Facilities Costs Financed by Fee s Summary per Land Use Category Land Use Type
Residential Fee per
Sq. Ft./ per 1,000
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.

Number of Projected
Units /
Non -Res. Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.0 8 20,462 $2,967,330
Commercial $441 6,893,730 $3,039,829
Industrial $146 20,599,049 $3,005,459
Total $9,012,618
Table 66 : Local Arterials Median Fee Summary
Land Use Fees
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.) $0.0 8
Commercial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.4 4
Industrial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.1 5
G.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed an nually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index average for Los Angeles as produced by ENR.
1785
64 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
H Active Transportation Plan
H.1 Active Transportation Plan Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The City’s goal is to improve the street s on a prioritized list over the build -out horizon. Improvements for e ach street will focus on the Active T ransportation Plan .

The Active Transportation Plan , released in 2017, is a Citywide plan that provides a clear and comprehensive framework for new, safer connectivity for non -motorized transportation, such as walking, bicycling, transit, and other rolling devices, throughout the City. This additional infrastructure support is necessary to provide safe and efficient non -motorized access throughout the City. The proposed DIF is to help meet the transportation demand of new development through 204 4. The City identified the need for the Active Transportation infrastructure and equipment, as described in Table 67 below.

The DIF will provide the City with revenue to acquire, install, and construct the necessary active transportation facilities, thereby preserving the quality of life in the City and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of existing and future residents and employees.

The table below illustrates how the Active Transportation fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding use of fees, type of development funded or partially funded by the Fee revenue, reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and proportionality requirements .
1786
65 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 67 : Active Transportation Plan Facilities Nexus Requirement AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct active transportation projects , including
interchange improvements, and other infrastructure
that will mitigate the impacts of new development on
the City's transportation system.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Fund or partially fund the construction of active
transportation and other infrastructure projects within the City limits.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development will
generate additional traffic on City streets. The Fee
revenue will be used to construct new transportation
projects for new residents and employees . A Fee
imposed on new residential and non -residential
development is a reasonable means of mitigating the
impacts of such development and any resulting
increase in LOS, above and beyond the current LOS
required to meet the plan approved by the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional traffic volumes generated by the new
development will affect current congestion levels .

New active transportation and other infrastructure are
needed to mitigate the impact of the increased traffic
volumes. If the proposed projects are not constructed
in concert with new development, the City's
transportation system will experience higher traffic
volumes , increasing congestion to a level well below
City standards.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the amount
of the Fee and the cost of the
public facility.

Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any DIF program. In the broadest sense, the purpose of impact fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing adequate public facilities . Notably, for the Active Transportation Facilities, the City provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List.

Table 68 below summarizes the Active Transportation Needs List . The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City. 1787
66 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 68 : Active Transportation Plan Facilities Costs
Active Transportation Facilities Facility Cost
Class I Shared - Use Path $85,279,551
Class II Bike Lanes $8,419,984
Class IV Separated Bikeway Construction $1,329,185
Transportation Facilities Subtotal $95,028,721
Offsetting Revenue $173,776
Total $94,854,945
H.2 Offsetting Revenues
According to City Staff, offsetting revenues need to be considered in the total for the Active Transportation Facilities calculation . As of the end of September 2025 , the City had $173,776 in its current Active Transportation Facilities account that needed to be subtracted from the cost total as indicated in Table 68 above.

H.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

The City’s Active Transportation facilities, built to date , are consistent with the existing LOS required by the City to meet the needs of the population. The list of projects to be built by the City (and presented in detail in Appendix B to this Fee Study) details the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and outlines the criteria used to design a system needed to serve both existing and future development. The portion of the fee associated with existing Active T ransportat ion facilities reflects the current LOS that would be applied to new development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

H.4 Calculation Methodology
Local Active Transportation fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number o f ADTs. ADTs are published by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11
th Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units), and daily trip generation is per 1,000 square feet of building area for each category of non -residential development . Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single , one -directional movement of a person or vehicle in which either the origin 1788
67 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
or the destination is entered or exited . In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip.

For trip site generation, the focus is on the trips entering and exiting a single site.

Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, generated by a particular use or development within a 24 -hour weekday period .

All proposed Active Transportation facilities were designed to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E BUs. As illustrated in Table 69 below, 73.70 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development, and 26.30 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $24,946,558 of the $94,854,945 in Active Transportation facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining amount must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.

Table 69 : Active Transportation Plan Cost Allocation Summary Development Type ADTs (EBUs) Percentage Allocated Facility Cost Allocation Existing Development 910,344 73.70 % $69,908,387
New Development 324,853 26.30 % $24,946,558
Total 1,235,197 100.00% $94,854,945
To calculate the Fee s, DTA determined the number of AD Ts expected through 204 4 based on the expected residential and non -residential growth in the City. The analysis estimates that up to 324,853 additional ADTs would be generated by land - use growth, as detailed in Table 70 below.

Table 70 : Active Transportation Number of Trip Calculations Land Use Type
Projected
Development
(Units)
Projected
Development
(Sq. Ft.)
ADT Generation
Rate 1
Total ADTs
(EBUs) 2
Residential 20,462 5.64 115,406
Commercial 6,893,730 15.28 105,319
Industrial 20,599,049 5.06 104,128
Total 324,853
Note s:
1 Projected ADTs per unit for residential and per 1,000 Square Feet for non -residential. 2 Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Table 71, presented below, summarizes the cost per ADT, calculated by dividing the cost of new development ($ 24,946,558 ) by the number of ADTs generated by new development ( 324,853 ). When accounting for the City's planned 324,853 ADTs, the cost per ADT is $ 77, as shown in the table below. Th e cost per ADT of $ 77 was then 1789
68 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
applied to the various land uses and their respective ADT trip generation rates to determine the proposed Fee .

Table 71: Active Transportation Cost per EBU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $24,946,558
Total ADTs Added by New Development 324,853
DIF Cost Per ADT $77
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

H.5 Active Transportation Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU of $ 77 by the total number of residential EBUs (115,406), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $ 8,862,401 . This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square footage of 39,912,787 , yielding a per-square -foot fee of $ 0.22. Details of this calculation are shown in Ta ble 72 below.

Table 72: Residential Active Transportation Plan Costs Financed by Fee s per Land Use Category 1
Land Use Type ADT s per Unit Number of
Projected Units Calculation Total EDUs
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Total Residential 20,462 [a] 115,406
Total Cost per EDU [b] $77
Total Fees [c] = [a] x [b] $8,862,401
Total Residential Sq. Ft. [d] 39,912,787
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft. [e] = [c]/[d] $0.2 2 Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, t he non -residential f ee per sq. ft. was calculated by multiplying the cost per EBU ($ 77) by the total number of non -residential EBUs applicable to each land -use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses. 1790
69 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 73: Non - Residential Active Transportation Plan Facilities Costs Financed by Land Use Category 1
Land Use Type EBUs per
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. 1
Non -Residential
Fee per 1,000 SF.

Number of
Projected
Non -Res. SF
Costs Financed
by Fees
[a] [b] = [a] x $77 [c] [e] = [c] x [b]
Commercial 15.28 $1,173 6,893,730 $8,087,800
Industrial 5.06 $388 20,599,049 $7,996,357
Total $16,084,157
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

H.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed calculation of the Active Transportation Facilities Fee is presented in Table 74 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non - residential development , subject to the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 74: Active Transportation Plan Facilities Costs Financed by Fee s Summary per Land Use Category
Land Use Type
Residential Fee per
Sq. Ft./ per 1,000
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.

Number of Projected
Units /
Non -Res. Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.2 2 20,462 $8,862,401
Commercial $1,173 6,893,730 $8,087,800
Industrial $349 20,599,049 $7,996,357
Total $24,946,558
Active Transportation Facilities DIFs for residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Table 7 5 below Table 75 : Active Transportation Plan Fee Summary
Land Use Fees
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.) $0.2 2
Commercial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $1.17
Industrial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.3 9
H.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study 1791
70 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based on the average of the BCI cost indices for Los Angeles , as produced by ENR.
1792
71 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
I Traffic Signals
I.1 Traffic Signal Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The City’s goal is to improve the street s on a prioritized list over the build -out horizon. Improvements for e ach street will focus on the Active Transportation Plan.

The Active Transportation Plan, released in 2017, is a Citywide plan that provides a clear and comprehensive framework for new, safer connectivity for non -motorized transportation, such as walking, bicycling, transit, and other rolling devices, throughout the City. This additional infrastructure support is necessary to provide safe and effici ent non -motorized access throughout the City. The proposed DIF is to help meet the transportation demand of new development through 204 4. The City identified the need for the Traffic Signal infrastructure and equipment, as described in Table 76 below.

The DIF will provide the City with revenue to acquire, install, and construct the necessary Traffic Signal facilities, thereby preserving the quality of life in the City and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of existing and future residents and employees.

The table below illustrates how the Traffic Signal Facilities fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 regarding use of fees, type of development funded or partially funded by the Fee revenue, reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and proportionality requirements .
1793
72 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 76: Traffic Sign al Facilities Nexus Requirement
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct Traffic Signal Facilities projects , including interchange improvements, and other infrastructure
that will mitigate the impacts of new development on
the City's transportation system.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Fund or partially fund the construction of Traffic
Signal Facilities and other infrastructure projects
within the City limits.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development will
generate additional traffic on City streets. The Fee
revenue will be used to construct new Traffic Signal
Facilities for new residents and employees . A Fee
imposed on new residential and non -residential
development is a reasonable means of mitigating the
impacts of such development and any resulting
increase in LOS, above and beyond the current LOS
required to meet the plan approved by the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

The additional traffic volumes generated by the new
development will affect current congestion levels .

New Traffic Signal Facilities are needed to mitigate the impact of the increased traffic volumes. If the
proposed projects are not constructed in concert with
new development, the City's transportation system
will experience higher traffic volumes , increasing
congestion to a level well below City standards.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the Fee
amount and the cost of the
public facility.

Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any DIF program. In the broadest sense, the purpose of impact fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing adequate public facilities . Notably, for the Traffic Signal Facilities, the City provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List.

Table 77 below summarizes the Traffic Signal Facilties Needs List . The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City. 1794
73 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 77: Traffic Signal Facilities Costs
Traffic Signal Facilities Facility Cost
Traffic Signals $43,000,000
Traffic Signal Facilities Subtotal $43,000,000
Offsetting Revenue $45,315
Total $42,954,685
I.2 Offsetting Revenues
According to City Staff, offsetting revenues need to be considered in the total for the Traffic Signal Facilities calculation . As of the end of September 2025 , the City had $45,315 in its current Traffic Signal Facilities account that needed to be subtracted from the cost total as indicated in Table 77 above.

I.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

The City’s Traffic Signal f acilities, built to date, are consistent with the existing LOS required by the City to meet population needs . The list of projects to be built by the City ( presented in detail in Appendix B of this Fee Study) outlines the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City and the criteria used to design a system to serve both existing and future development. The portion of the fee associated with existing Traffic Signal facilities reflects the current LOS that would be applied to new development. Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

I.4 Calculation Methodology
Traffic Signal Facilities fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number o f ADTs. ADTs are published by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11
th Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units), and daily trip generation is per 1,000 square feet of building area for each category of non -residential development . Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single , one -directional movement of a person or vehicle in which either the origin or the des tination is entered or exited . In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip.

For trip site generation, the focus is on the trips entering and exiting a single site. 1795
74 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, generated by a particular use or development within a 24 -hour weekday period .

All proposed Traffic Signal facilities were designed to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E BUs. As illustrated in Table 69 below, 73.70% of the costs will be allocated to existing development, and 26.30% to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $11,296,950 of the $42,954,685 in Traffic Signal facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining amount must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.

Table 78: Traffic Signal Facilities Cost Allocation Summary Development Type ADTs (EBUs) Percentage Allocated Facility Cost Allocation Existing Development 910,344 73.70 % $31,657,735
New Development 324,853 26.30 % $11,296,950
Total 1,235,197 100.00% $42,954,685
To calculate the Fee s, DTA determined the number of AD Ts expected through 204 4 based on the expected residential and non -residential growth in the City. The analysis estimates that up to 324,853 additional ADTs would be generated by land - use growth, as detailed in Table 79 below.

Table 76: Traffic Signal Number of Trip Calculations
Land Use Type
Projected
Development
(Units)
Projected
Development
(Sq. Ft.)
ADT Generation
Rate 1
Total ADTs
(EBUs) 2
Residential 20,462 5.64 115,406
Commercial 6,893,730 15.28 105,319
Industrial 20,599,049 5.06 104,128
Total 324,853
Note s:

1. Projected ADTs per unit for residential and per 1,000 Square Feet for non -residential.

2. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Table 80 , presented below, summarizes the cost per ADT, calculated by dividing the cost of new development ($ 11,296,950 ) by the number of ADTs generated by new development (324,853). When accounting for the City's planned 324,853 ADTs, the cost per ADT is $ 35, as shown in the table below. Th e cost per ADT of $ 35 was then applied to the various land uses and their respective ADT trip generation rates to determine the proposed Fee .
1796
75 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 80 : Traffic Signal Facilities Cost per EBU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Total
Cost Allocated to New Development $11,296,950
Total ADTs Added by New Development 324,853
DIF Cost Per ADT $35
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

I.5 Traffic Signal Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per-unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate .

The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU of $ 35 by the total number of residential EBUs (115,406), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $ 4,013,303 . This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square footage of 39,912,787, yielding a per -square -foot fee of $ 0.10. Details of this calculation are shown in Table 81 below.

Table 81: Residential Traffic Signal Facilities Costs Financed by Fee s per Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type ADT s per Unit Number of
Projected Units Calculation Total EDUs
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Total Residential 20,462 [a] 115,406
Total Cost per EDU [b] $35
Total Fees [c] = [a] x [b] $4,013,303
Total Residential Sq. Ft. [d] 39,912,787
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft. [e] = [c]/[d] $0.10
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, t he non -residential f ee per sq. ft. was calculated by multiplying the cost per EBU ($77) by the total number of non -residential EBUs applicable to each land -use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses. 1797
76 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 82 : Non - Residential Traffic Signal Facilities Costs Financed by Land Use Category 1 Land Use Type EBUs per
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. 1
Non -Residential
Fee per 1,000 SF.

Number of
Projected
Non -Res. SF
Costs Financed
by Fees
[a] [b] = [a] x $77 [c] [e] = [c] x [b]
Commercial 15.28 $513 6,893,730 $3,622,528
Industrial 5.06 $176 20,599,049 $3,621,118
Total $7,283,647
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

I.6 Proposed Fees
A summary of the proposed calculation of the Traffic Signal f acilities Fee is presented in Table 83 below. The Fees recommended in this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable Fee level that the City may impose on new residential and non -residential development, subject to the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq .

Table 83 : Traffic Signal Facilities Costs Financed by Fee s Summary per Land Use Category Land Use Type
Residential Fee per
Sq. Ft./ per 1,000
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.

Number of Projected
Units /
Non -Res. Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.10 20,462 $4,013,303
Commercial $531 6,893,730 $3,662,528
Industrial $176 20,599,049 $3,621,118
Total $11,296,950
Traffic Signal Facilities DIFs for residential and non -residential development (using a per square foot metric) are summarized in Table 84 below Table 84 : Traffic Signal Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use Fees
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.) $0.10
Commercial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.53
Industrial (Per Sf. Ft. ) $0.18
I.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et. seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and 1798
77 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This construction cost index is based on the average of the BCI cost indices for Los Angeles , as produced by ENR.
1799
78 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
J Sewer DIF s
J.1 Sewer Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Sewer Facilities category encompasses the facilities utilized by the City to deliver basic sanitary sewer services to residents and employees within the City . These element s consist of downstream collectors that convey wastewater from local drainage areas, such as residential tracts and business parks, to county trunk sewer lines and treatment facilities. These proposed facilities provide a Citywide benefit by ensuring sufficient system -wide capacity to collect wastewater from new and existing developments through 2040. This section of the Fee S tudy considers existing and future needs to accommodate City staf f at build -out and to expand City sewer facilities.

To support future development through General Plan build -out, the City has identified the need to combine projects , basins, and other facilities. Table 76 below illustrates how the Sewer Facilities Fee meet s the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the Fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for the facilities, and the proportionality requirements.
1800
79 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 85 : Sewer Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source to pay for the
construction/expansion of sewer facilities such as trunk mains, basins, a nd equipment that will mitigate the
impacts of new development on the City’s Sewer
facilities.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the Fee
is to be put.

Revenue from this fee will be used to construct and
expand /enhance new sewer facilities , such as landfill flare modifications, trunk mains, basins, and equipment to provide general sewer collection and treatment
services.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the Fee’s use and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential developments will
generate additional residents and employees , thereby
increasing demand for Sewer facilities. Sewer Fees
collected from new development will be used
exclusively for construction -related costs associated
with these projects. Fees imposed on new residential
and non -residential development are a reasonable
means of mitigating the impacts of new development
and any resulting increase in LOS beyond the current
LOS required to meet the plan approved by the Ci ty.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the Fee is
imposed.

New residential and non -residential development in
the City’s Sewer Service Area will generate additional
residents and employees, who will increase the need to
collect and treat sewage generated by such new
development. New sewer infrastructure , such as trunk
mains, basins, and equipment, is needed to collect and
treat sewer generated from new developments in the
City’s Sewer Service Area.
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the Fee
amount and the cost of the public
facility.

The cost of the proposed facilities is based on
projected sewer generation from the various land uses.

The fee for each land use is calculated based on its
relative contribution to the Citywide sewer flow .

It’s important to note that for Sewer Facilities, the City provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 86 below summarizes the Needs List.

The facilities presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.

1801
80 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 86 : Sewer Facilities Needs List
Sewer Facilities Facility Cost
Diversion Structures $297,600
Pipelines $58,727,175
Lift Stations $11,625,000
Subtotal $70,649,775
Offsetting Revenues $0.00
Sewer Facilities Total $70,649,775
J.2 Offsetting Revenues
In calculating DIFs, it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the total of the Sewer facilities calculations , as any existing account balance or other offsetting revenue funds must be subtracted from the facilities cost total . Currently , the City has $0.00 in its Sewer Facilities account , which can be subtracted from the total facilities cost , as indicated in Table 77 above.

J.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section examines the LOS for water facilities, a system that encompasses several key consider ations, including water supply, gallons per day, water quality, storage capacity, water pressure , and citywide reliability .

The City’s latest Capital Improvement Plan update identifies and itemizes the planned sewer facilities necessary to accommodate new growth and provide required service to the City.

J.4 Calculation Methodology
Sewer generation is directly related to water demand. Interior water use (excluding landscape irrigation, which is considered part of water demand) generally accounts for half (and often more) of the total water demand for a residential unit. Sewer Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on wastewater generation measured in GPD; i.e., the EBU factor (see Section V) generated by each land use. Total GPDs were calculated by applying these wastewater generation rates to the vario us dwelling unit counts and non -residential square feet identified in the demographics section of this Fee Study. Calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A .
1802
81 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
All proposed sewer facilities will serve both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities are typically allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of build -out EBUs .

All proposed sewer facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out EBUs. As illustrated in Table 87 , below, 74.45 % of the costs will be allocated to existing development, and 25.55 % to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $18,054,029 of the $70,649,775 in sewer facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $52,595,746 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.

Table 87: Sewer Facilities Cost Allocation Summary
Development Type Percentage Allocated to New
Development Facility Cost Allocation
Existing Development 74.45% $52,595,746
New Development 25. 55% $18,054,029
Total $70,649,775
To determine the Sewer Fees, DTA calculated the number of gallons per day (GPDs) generated by sewer service through 2040, based on anticipated residential and non - residential growth in the City. As shown in Table 88 below, the analysis estimates that land -use growth would generate 5,440,652 additional EDUs . This is presented in detail in Appendix A
Table 88 : Sewer Generation by Land Use 1
Land Use Sewer Generated
GPD Unit Category Units /Sq. Ft. Total EDUs Total Costs Residential 208.81 Per Unit 4,272,684 $14,178,293
Commercial 55.10 Per 1000 sq. ft. 6,893,730 379,820 $1,260,378 Industrial 38.26 Per 1000 sq. ft. 20,599,049 788,148 $2,615,358 Total 5,440,652 $18,054,029
Table 89 below summarizes the cost per $1,000 GPD (note: per 1,000 GPD is used to avoid rounding significant figures) , calculated by dividing the total cost of new development ($ 18,054,029 ) by the number of GPDs generated by new development (5,440,652) and multiplying by 1,000 GPD, resulting in a total of $3,318, as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective GPD generation rates to dete rmine the proposed Fee. 1803
82 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 89 : Sewer Cost per EBU 1
Proposed Facilities Costs Calculation Total
Cost Allocation to New Development [a] $18,054,029
Total GPDs added by New Development [b] $5,440,652
Multiplier [c ] 1,000
DIF Cost Per 1,000 GPDs ([a]/[b]) x [c] $3,318
Cost per EBU [c]/1,000 $3.32
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

J.5 Sewer Fee Calculation
The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per EBU of $3.32 by the total number of residential EBUs (4,272,684), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $14,178,293. This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential sq. ft. (39,912,787) to generate the Fee per sq. ft. of $0.36.

Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.

Table 90 : Residential Sewer Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Land Use Type GPD s per Unit Number of
Projected Units Calculation Total EDUs
Residential 208.81 20,462 4,272,684
Total Residential 20,462 [a] 4,272,684
Total Cost per E BU [b] $3.32
Total Fees [c] = [a] x [b] $14,178,293
Total Residential Sq. Ft. [d] 39,912,787
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft. [e] = [c]/[d] $0.36
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Similarly, t he fee per 1,000 s q. ft. was calculated by multiplying the cost per EBU ($3.32 ) by the total number of non -residential EBUs applicable to each land -use type.

The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non -residential land uses.
1804
83 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 91: Non -Residential Sewer Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Land Use Category 1
Land Use Type EBUs per 1,000
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. 1
Fee per 1,000 SF.

Number of
Projected
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.

Costs Financed
by Fees
[a] [b] = [a] x $3.32 [c] [e] = [c] x [b]
Commercial 55 $182.83 6,893,730 $1,260,378
Industrial 38 $126.97 20,599,049 $2,615,358
Total $3,875,736
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

J.6 Proposed Fees
The proposed Sewer Fee amounts are summarized in Table 92 below.

Table 77: Non -Residential Sewer DIF by Meter 1
Land Use Type
Residential Fee per Sq.

Ft./per 1,000 Non - Res.

Sq. Ft.

Number of Project Units
/ Non - Res. St. Ft.

Costs Financed by
Fees
Residential $0.36 39,912,787 $14,178,293
Commercial $182.83 6,893,730 $1,260,378
Industrial $126.97 20,599,049 $2,615,358
Total $18,054,029
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Sewer Facilities DIFs for residential and non -residential development (using per sq foot metric are summarized in Table 93 below.

Table 93 : Sewer Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use
Costs
Financed by
Fees
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.) $0.36
Commercial (Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $0.18
Industrial (Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $013
1805
84 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
J.7 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This CCI is based on the BCI average for Los Angeles, as reported by ENR.
1806
85 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
K Storm Drain Fees
K.1 Storm Drain Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Storm Drain Facilities element will serve the residents of the City by providing infrastructure that ensures proper drainage in areas susceptible to stormwater runoff. Storm Drain Facilities include those used by the City to provide storm drainage services to residents and employees within the City's boundaries . The Storm Drain Fee will include the facilities and expansion necessary to handle storm drain runoff generated by new development through build -out by the year 2040.

Table 94 below illustrates how the Storm Drain Facilities Fee meets the requirements of AB 1600 regarding the use of the Fee, the types of development funded or partially funded by Fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for the facilities, and proportionality requirements.
1807
86 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 78: Storm Drain Facilities Nexus Requirement
AB 1600 Code
Section Description Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct and expand /enhance storm drain improvements
that will mitigate the impacts of new development on the City's storm drain system.
66001(a)(2) Identify the use to which the
Fee is to be put.

Fund or partially fund the construction and expansion of storm basins , laterals, tributary drains, and related projects within the City limits.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship
between the Fee’s use and the
type of development project
on which the fee is imposed.

New residential and non -residential development will
increase the City's storm drain needs . The Fee revenue will be used to construct and expand storm drain basins ,
laterals, tributary drains , and related improvements. Storm Drain fees collected from new development will be used
exclusively for construction -related costs associated with these projects . Fees imposed on new residential and non - residential development are a reasonable means of
mitigating the impacts of such development and any
resulting inc rease in LOS beyond the current LOS required to meet the plan s approved by the City.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship
between the need for the
public facilities and the type of
development project on which
the Fee is imposed.

Storm Drain Fee revenue will go towards new facilities and improvements necessary to mitigate storm drain runoff
from new development. The construction and expansion
of storm drain basins, laterals, tributary drains, and related improvements are needed to ensure proper drainage of
stormwater runoff and protect the City from flooding .
66001(b)
Demonstrate a reasonable
relationship between the
amount of the Fee and the cost
of the public facility.

Project costs are allocated to new development based on the stormwater and impervious runoff generated per acre .

The specific Fee imposed on various land uses is based on stormwater runoff coefficients relative to a residential unit (baseline rate or EDU factor).

For Storm Drain Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the “Needs List”). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 95 below summarizes the Needs List. The facility costs presented below are based on estimates provided by the City. 1808
87 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 95 : Storm Drain Facilities Costs
Storm Drain Facilities Facility Cost
AOS 1 $898,928,000
AOS 2 $131,702,000
AOS 3 $137,433,000
Storm Drain Facilities Subtotal $1,168,063,000
Offsetting Revenues $13,869,013
Storm Drain Facilities Total $1,154,193,987
K.2 Offsetting Revenues
In calculating DIFs, it is important to consider any offsetting revenue in the City Storm Drain calculations total, as any existing account balance or other offsetting revenue funds must be subtracted from the facilities cost total. Currently, there is a balance of $13,869,013 in the Storm Drain Facilities account to subtract from the total facilities cost, as indicated in Table 95 above.

K.3 LOS
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 , the Governor of California signed AB 602, which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that , when applicable, a Nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS , and explain why the new LOS is necessary.

This section examines the LOS for Storm Drain facilities to ensure sufficient system - wide capacity to direct storm drain runoff at storm recurrence intervals as dictated by City policy, from both new and existing developments .

Although the Storm Drain facilities fee is a plan -based calculation, the list of projects to be built by the City (and presented in detail in Appendix B to this Fee Study) details the planned facilities necessary to provide required services to the City, and it also outlines the criteria used to design a system needed to serve both existing and future development. The portion of the fee associated with existing Storm Drain facilities represents the current LOS , which would be applied to new developments . Notably, the future facilities have been identified by the City ( in its Capital Improvement Plan) as necessary to serve both new and existing development; therefore, any increase in the LOS beyond the current level would be required to meet the City - approved plan .

K.4 Calculation Methodology
Storm Drain Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the runoff rates, measured in terms of the relative contribution of runoff (i.e., the EBU factor - see Section V) generated by each land use. Specifically, the reasonable relationship used to allocate storm drain costs among existing, converted use, and future development is based on relative runoff contribution. The Rational M ethod of computing runoff rates was used in the form of Q = C x I x A , where “Q” is equal to 1809
88 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
runoff volume, “C” is the ratio of area to total area studied, “I” is rainfall intensity , and “A” is Area, in acres of the Fee S tudy area. A runoff factor, “C” of 1.00, indicates a totally site, where every drop of rain would find its way to the public streets as runoff.

However, it can be shown that only the relative contribution of runoff needs to be considered when computing runoff (Q/A), using only the runoff factor and acreage .

This is the assumption used in this calculation.

Total Runoff was calculated by applying these runoff factors to the estimated acreage attributable to the various dwelling unit counts and non -residential square feet identified in the demographics section of this Fee Study . As discussed in Section V, runoff factors per acre for residential units and non -residential development are based on guidelines provided by the City Staff and from the 2020 Cal Trans Design Highway Design Manual Chapter 810 Hydrology , and reviewed with City staff. In addition, runoff factors were taken from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) guidelines .

All proposed Storm Drain facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing and new development based on their respective percentages of buil d-out E BUs. As illustrated in Table 96 below , based on the allocation of 6,802 existing runoff EBUs and 1,934 new development EBUs, 75.77% of costs will be allocated to existing development and 22.14 % to new development.

Based on this allocation be tween new and existing development, $255,556,461 of the $1,154,193,987 in Storm Drain facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $ 898,637,526 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City
Table 96 : Storm Drain Facilities Cost Allocation Summary 1 Development Type
Allocation by
Total Unit
Runoff (EBUs)
Percentage Allocations Facility Cost
Allocation
Existing Development 6,802 75.77% $874,492,265
New Development 2,176 24.23 % $279,701,722
Total 8,978 100.00% $1,154,193,987
Note :

1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Table 97, presented below , summarizes the cost per unit runoff, calculated by dividing the cost of new development ($ 279,701,722 ) by the unit runoff generated by new development ( 2,176). When accounting for the anticipated unit runoff (EBUs) from new development, the cost per unit runoff totals $ 128,564 as shown in the table below. This per-unit runoff cost will be applied to the various land uses and their respective total runoff rates to determine the proposed Fee. This is presented in detail in Appendix A . 1810
89 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 97 : Storm Drain Facilities Cost per Unit Runoff 1 Land Use Total
Cost Allocated to New Development [a] $279,701,722
Total Runoff Added by New Development [b] 2,176
DIF Cost per Unit Runoff [a]/[b] $128,564
K.5 Floor Area Ratios (FARs) and Runoff Coefficients
To generate the Storm Drain Fees, DTA calculated the total runoff expected through 2040 based on the anticipated residential and non -residential growth in the City. To do this, residential development was calculated using dwelling units per acre, and non -residential development was calculated using FAR s listed in the City’s General Plan, with information reviewed and provided by the City.

In addition, runoff coefficients were estimated for each land use . Runoff coefficients are used to calculat e the volume of water that will flow from the surface during a storm event. They represent the fraction of rainfall that becomes surface runoff and are used to estimate peak flow rates for drainage systems. A coefficient of 0 means all rainfall is absorbed or lost, while a coefficient of 1 signifies all rainfall becomes runoff. Essentially, runoff coefficients help determine how much water a draina ge system needs to handle. Runoff coefficients generally vary by project , but under current Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) guidelines, most new developments are in the 0.75 range. The calculations explaining this in detail are presented in Appendix A at the end of this Fee S tudy.

K.6 Storm Drain Facilities Fee Calculation
The Storm Drain fees are calculated based on the amount of surface area on a property. Hard surfaces , such as buildings, driveways, patios, and parking lots, prevent rainwater from soaking into the ground, leading to increased stormwater runoff. This runoff needs to be managed to prevent flooding and protect water quality. In this analysis, the storm drain fees are based on impervious acres.

Table 98 : Projected Storm Drain Usage by Land Use
Land Use Category Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C"
Cost per Unit Runoff
Allocation Rate per
Impervious Acre
Total Acres Cost Financed
[a] [b] = [a] x $ 128,564 [c] [d] = [b] x [c]
Residential 0.6 0 $77,138 1,023 $78,920,173
Commercial 0.95 $122,136 316 $38,657,907
Industrial 0.80 $102,851 1,576 $162,123,642
Total New Development $279,701,722
1811
90 SECTION VI

CALCULATION OF FEES
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
As indicated in Table 98 above, the residential Storm Drain Fee per acre. wa s determined by multiplying the runoff coefficient of 0.60 by the cost per unit runoff, resulting in a residential fee of $ 79,268 per impervious acre. This calculation is repeated for each non -residential land use listed and summarized in Table 99 below .

K.7 Proposed fees
Storm Drain Facilities DIFs for residential and non -residential development, per acre, are summarized below.

Table 99 : Storm Drain Fee Summary
Land Use Fee per
Impervious Acre
Residential $77,138
Commercial Retail $122,136
Industrial $102,851
K.8 DIF Annual Cost Escalation Recommendations
The fees recommended within this Fee Study reflect the maximum justifiable fee level that may be imposed on new development under the statutory requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq . As the DIFs proposed in this Fee Study are based on Facilities costs in 202 5 dollars, it is appropriate for the City to apply an annual escalator to these fee levels to account for inflation in acquisition and construction costs. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed annually and include a provision for an adjustment based on the current CCCI. This CCI is based on the BCI average for Los Angeles, as reported by ENR.
1812
91 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE SCHEDULE
In addition to the legal requirements covered in Section III , this report presents several recommendations for the adoption and administration of the DIFs . All recommendations presented in this section are based on the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §66000 et seq.) , also referred to as the “Act,” which provides specific requirements for establishing and administering DIF programs. The Act also mandates procedures for administering impact fee programs , such as the collection and accounting of impact f ees, refunds, mandatory updates, and reporting requirements .

At the time the City imposes an impact fee, Government Code 66020 requires a written statement of the fee amount and a written notice of a 90 -day period during which the fee can be protested. Prior to the enactment of Section 66020, a developer could not challenge the validity of fees imposed on a residential development without refusing to pay them.

Under these circumstances, developers were required to pay the disputed fees before they could challenge them . Section 66020 was drafted to correct that pro blem.

The various subparts of Section 66020 allow a developer to pay the fees under protest, obtain the relevant building permit, and proceed with the project while pursuing an action to challenge the fees. If the action is successful, the fees will be refunded with interest.

However, failure to protest the imposition of the fee within the allowed period may deprive the fee payer of the right to pursue any subsequent legal challenge . Any challenges must be filed within 90 days of enactment. The subsequent sec tions provide specific guidelines for implementing DIFs.

A The Collection of DIFs
According to Government Code Section 66007, any local agency that imposes any fees or charges on a residential development for the construction of public improvements or facilities shall not require the payment of those fees or charges, notwithstanding any other provision of law, unti l the date of the final inspection, or the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first.

However, utility service fees may be collected upon receipt of a utility service application .

If the residential development contains more than one dwelling, the local agency may determine whether the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro rata basis for each dwelling when (i) it receives its final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy , (ii) on a pro rata basis when a certain percentage of the dwellings have received their final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, or (iii) on a lump sum basis when the first dwelling in the development receives its final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy , whichever of the three occur first.

An exception allows DIFs to be collected earlier if they are used to reimburse the agency for expenditures previously incurred or for public improvements or facilities for which funds have already been appropriated. If any fee or charge specified is not fully paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction, the local agency issuing the building permit may require the property owner, or lessee if the lessee’s interest appears of record, as a 1813
92 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
condition of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion.

Statutory restrictions in place for residential development at the time at which fees may be collected do not apply to non -residential development. In cases where the fees are not collected upon the issuance of building permits, Sections 6607(c)(1) and (2 ) provide that the City may require the property owner of a non -residential development to execute a contract to pay the fee and subsequently record that contract as a lien against the property owner.

In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2(f), ADUs are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water corporations if such a unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the ADU to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. Furthermore, the water capital improvem ent fee, water supply fee, and sewer capital improvement fee shall not be appli cable to any ADU created within the existing space of a single -family residence or accessory structure, including, but not limited to, a studio, pool house, or other similar structure. Please note that for purposes of this Fee Study, future ADUs are included in the build -out projections, but some of these units may not be required to pay an impact fee. As a result, the City may not collect the full amount of costs as shown in the Needs Lists included herein.

B The Assignment and Expenditure of Fee Revenue
According to Section 66006, if a local agency requires the payment of a fee specified in connection with the approval of a development project, the local agency receiving the fee shall deposit it with the other fees for the improvement to be funded in a separate capital facilities account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except for temporary investments, and expend those fees solely for the purpose for which the fee was collec ted.

Any interest income earned in the capital facilities account or fund shall also be deposited in that account or fund and shall be expended only for the purpose for which the fee was originally collected.

Common practice is to maintain separate funds or accounts for impact fee revenues by facility category ( e.g., streets and park improvements), but not for individual projects . DTA recommends continuing that approach.

DIF revenue should not be spent on any infrastructure, property , or equipment needed to mitigate an existing deficiency.

C Exemptions, Reductions , and Waivers
If a project has characteristics that indicate its impact on a particular public facility or infrastructure system will be significantly and permanently smaller than the average impact used to calculate impact fees in this Fee S tudy, the fees should be reduced accordingly. The City may voluntarily waive or reduce fees that would otherwise apply to a project to 1814
93 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
promote goals such as affordable housing or economic development. However, implementing this policy may not increase costs for other development projects and is permitted only if any such costs are offset by other revenue sources.

D Developer Improvement Credits
If the City maintain s a policy that requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities for which impact fees have been or will be charged , the impact fee imposed on that development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a credit for such dedication or construction. Furthermore, the impact fee imposed on that development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the facilities or improvements constructed by the developer. If circu mstances allow a developer to dedicate land, buildings, or other valuable considerations in lieu of paying fees, the City maintains the discretion to accept or reject such offers and may negotiate the terms under which an offer would be accepted.

E Existing Development Credit
If a project involves replacement , redevelopment , or intensification of existing development, impact fees should be applied only to the portion of the project that represents a net increase in demand for relevant facilities, using the demand measure used in this Fee S tudy to calculate that fee. Since residential service demand is typically estimated per dwelling unit, an addition to a single -family dwelling unit would typically not be subject to an impact fee if it does not increase the number of dwelling units in the structure. In any project that results in a net increase in the number of dwelling units, the added units would normally be subjected to impact fees. A similar analysis can be applied to non -residential development using a demand measure on which impact fees are based.

F Annual Reporting and Accounting of Fees.

AB 1600 requires that both general law and charter cities account for every fee that they collect under its terms. Funds collected for each capital facility or service shall be deposited in separate accounts and not commingled with any other funds for other impact fees. While funds are accrued for individual capital facilities, the City must keep track of each fund and provide an annual report. Section 66006 requires that for each separate account or fund established, the local agency shall , within 180 d ays after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund ;

2. The amount of the fee ;

3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund ;

4. The amount of the fees collected, and the interest earned ;

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditure on each improvement, including the total percentage of 1815
94 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees ;

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete ;

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan ; and

8. The amount of refunds made pursuant to Subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

The City must review the information at the next regularly scheduled public meeting, not less than 15 days after it is made available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting, including the address where this information may be reviewed, should be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice.

G Refunding Policy
Under the Mitigation Fee Act, the Government Code §66000 et seq., each DIF must be deposited in a separate capital facilities account and may be expended only for the purposes for which it was collected. For all unexpended fees, the agency must make findings every 5 years that:

1. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put ;

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the unexpended balance and the purpose for which the fee was charged;

3. Ascertain the sources and funding for any as - yet-incomplete public improvements; and

4. Designate the approximate date the agency expects the funding for uncompleted improvements to be deposited in the account [§66001(d)(1) ]. The Act provides that “if the findings are not made as required by [the Act], the local agency shall refund the moneys in the account” to the current owners of the properties for which the fees were paid [§66001(d)(2) ].

Failure to make the findings specified in the Mitigation Fee Act requires a refund of all unexpe nd ed DIFs . When sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing of the public improvements contained in the CIP, the public agency shall identify "an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will be commenced" within 180 days of collecting the required funds (Gov. Code §66001(e) ]. Failure to comply with this 1816
95 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
requirement also mandates the return of the collected funds, as stated above.

In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2(f), ADUs are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water corporations if such a unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the ADU to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. Furthermore, as mentioned earlier, t he water improvement fee , water supply fee, and sewer fee shall not be applicable to any accessory dwelling unit created within the existing space of a single -family residence or accessory structure, including, but not limited to, a studio, pool house, or other similar structure .

This report does not address, nor has DTA been asked to determine, whether any current or proposed DIFs are valid under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment Takings Clause. In Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (2024) ___U.S.___, the U.S. Supreme Court held that its decisions in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825 and Dolan v.

City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374 apply to legislatively imposed condition s on land -use permits. But the Supreme Court left it to the California appellate court on remand to address the validity of the traffic impact fee at issue and to determine how to apply Nollan/Dolan in this context. DTA cannot predict how courts will resolve such issues in the future and is providing no services or guarantees of any kind concerning the validity of any impact fees under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.

H Annual Update of the CIP
It is common for jurisdictions to prepare a CIP in conjunction with a fee program. In fact, AB 1600 encourages the use of a CIP to assist in scheduling and implementing the services and improvements funded through impact fees (Gov. Code §66002) . A good CIP establishes a schedule of improvements necessary to accommodate the projected growth. The CIP must indicate the approximate size, location, time of availability, and estimated costs of all improvements to be financed through fees [Gov. Code §66002(a) ]. To create a usable CIP, a municipality must have an accurate understanding of its current service baseline and projected growth. This requires an understanding of when, where, and how growth may occur within the area . The more information collected about future growth, the more comprehensive and accurate the CIP will be. A CIP can also help a municipality determine when new public improvements or the expansion of existing public improvements are needed relative to the timing of new development.

If the public agency adopts a CIP, it must be updated annually [Gov. Code §66002(b) ]. A 10 - day published notice is provided pursuant to Government Code §65090 and is also provided to any city or county that may be significantly affected by the CIP . If a CIP is adopted and is use d as a basis for identifying the use of impact fees, the CIP must be adopted and updated annually by a resolution of the governing body at a public hearing. In the absence of a CIP, an alternative is to identify improvements in ot her public documents , such as General Plans, land studies , and other documents.
1817
96 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
I Administration Costs of Fee Implementation
The cost of implementing the DIFs is not included in the fees themselves and must be determined by the City . To recover the periodic costs of updating the fee studies, implementing the program, ongoing staff costs, managing the updates , and preparing annual and five - year updates required by the Mitigation Fee Act, an administration fee may be added to the impact fees calculated in this Fee Study. DTA recommends that these expenses be handled administratively and passed on to applicants through application processing fees . The calculation of the administrative cost for each fee in this Fee S tudy is presented in each respective fee section and in the Executive Summary .

J Indexing of Impact Fee Rates.

The DIFs presented in this report are based on current facility costs provided by the City and should be adjusted annually to account for inflation. The purpose of the adjustment is to account for future cost escalations in land , equipment, vehicles, and construction. DTA recommends that , after adoption, the fee be reviewed each year and adjusted using a reliable index, such as the ENR BCI, which is generally used as the primary basis for indexing construction costs. Ordinarily, land costs make up a significant portion of the fees and do not lend themselves to traditional cost indexes. As su ch, land costs should be adjusted to changes in local land prices.

K Updating the Impact Fee Study
As stated in Section III, AB 602 was signed into law in September of 2021 by the Governor of California , and it provides new Statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these requirements is the requirement that Nexus Studies be updated at least every 8 years , effective January 1, 2023. However, DTA concurs with the generally accepted policy that 5 years is a good rule of thumb for impact fee updates, particularly because the required 5 - Year Finding s (see above) can be approved at the same time. In some instances, fees may remain valid for a longer period of time if the City ’s land use and facility plans do not change . A case in point is a municipality at or near full build -out capacity . However, a dynamic , growing municipality facing significant land - use changes would do itself a disservice by maintaining the current fee structure for too long without a fee study to update the rates.

L Administering an Impact Fee Program.

Creating and administering an impact fee program can be a labor -intensive process requiring considerable preparation and training that should not be undertaken more often than necessary. A well -planned fee program can generate sufficient funds to enable the City to adequately mitigate the impacts of future development. Conversely, a poorly planned fee can result in either collecting too little money and being forced to pay for public facilities required as a result of future development through its Genera l Fund or collecting too much money based on an unsupported fee program, thus exposing the City to a fee challenge or a requirement to refund unexpected proceeds. 1818
97 SECTION VII

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE

SCHEDULE
City of Fontana May 26 , 2026
DRAFT Develop ment Impact Fee Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com
All personnel involved in the process , including accounting, capital budgeting, and project management in any other area, must be fully aware of the difference between impact fees and other fees, such as user fees, and of the guidelines and restrictions governing the expenditure of impact fee revenues. The building impact fees generated in this report are tied to specific facility improvements and cost estimates provided by the City . The fees must be expended accordingly , withstand any challenges, and demonstrate that the funds have been properly directed in accordance with AB 1600 guidelines. 1819
98 SECTION VIII

SUMMARY OF FEES
City of Fontana, CA March 11, 2026
DRAFT Development Impact Justification Study
www.FinanceDTA.com

SUMMARY OF FEES
The total proposed fee is intended to finance the new development’s share of the costs of new facilities, as summarized below.

Table 100 : DIF Summary
Land Use 1 2 Public
Facilities Police Fire Library Parks Landscape Medians
Local
Arterials
Active
Trans.

1. Residential fees are for single -family residences, multi -family residences, and mobile homes and are per square foot to comply with California AB 602.

2. Non -Residential fees are per 1,000 square feet.

The Storm Drain fees presented in Table 101 below are calculated based on the amount of surface area on a property. Surfaces such as buildings, driveways, patios, and parking lots are hard surfaces that prevent rainwater from soaking into the ground, increasing stormwater runoff. This runoff need s to be managed to prevent flooding and protect water quality. In this analysis, storm drain fees are based on the number of acres.

Table 101 : Proposed Sewer DIF (Maximum Allowable Fee)
Land Use Fee per
Impervious Acre
Residential $77,138
Commercial Retail $122,136
Industrial $102,851
The cost estimates for facilities used in this Fee Study are in 2025 dollars. Therefore, DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed each year and include a provision for an annual inflationary adjustment based on the CCCI. This construction cost index is based upon the BCI cost index for Los Angeles as produced by the ENR. 1820

APPENDIX A
City of Fontana
DRAFT Development Impact Fee Justification Study

FEE DERIVATION

WORKSHEETS
1821
I. Existing EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 214,223 3.63 1.00 58,993 58,993
Commercial 22,795 1.38 0.38 13,882,988 5,257
Industrial 18,077 0.38 0.10 72,309,782 7,467
Total 255,096 71,717
II. Projected EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 74,304 3.63 1.00 20,462 20,462
Commercial 5,773 1.38 0.38 6,893,730 2,610
Industrial 16,763 0.38 0.10 20,599,049 2,127
Total 96,840 25,200
III. Projected Facilities Costs
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Costs $110,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $1,915,624
Total Facilities Cost $108,084,376
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing Facilities Development EDU's Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 74.00% $79,981,071
New Development 25,200 26.00% $28,103,305
Total 96,917 100.00% $108,084,376
`
V. Allocation of New Development
Facility
Number of
Projected EDUs Cost to New Development Cost per EDU
Public Facilities 25,200 $28,103,305 $1,115
VI. Calculated Fee
Land Use Type Sq. Ft/ 1,000 Sq. Ft. Units/ Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.57 20,462 $22,819,869
Commercial $422 6,893,730 $2,911,093
Industrial $115 20,599,049 $2,372,343
Total $28,103,305
VII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.57
Commercial Retail (per Sq. Ft.) $0.42
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.12

APPENDIX A

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
1822
I. Existing EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 214,223 3.63 1.00 58,993 58,993
Commercial 22,795 1.38 0.38 13,882,988 5,257
Industrial 18,077 0.38 0.10 72,309,782 7,467
Total 255,096 71,717
II. Projected EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 74,304 3.63 1.00 20,462 20,462
Commercial 5,773 1.38 0.38 6,893,730 2,610
Industrial 16,763 0.38 0.10 20,599,049 2,127
Total 96,840 25,200
III. Projected Facilities Costs
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Cost $108,500,000
Offsetting Revenues $4,079,433
Total Facilities Cost $104,420,567
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing Facilities Development EDU's Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 74.00% $77,269,899
New Development 25,200 26.00% $27,150,668
Total 96,917 100.00% $104,420,567
`
V. Allocation of New Development
Facility
Number of
Projected EDUs
Cost to New
Development Cost per EDU
Facilities Costs 25,200 $27,150,668 $1,077
VI. Calculated Fee
Land Use Type Sq. Ft/ 1,000 Sq. Ft. Units/ Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.55 20,462 $22,046,328
Commercial $408 6,893,730 $2,812,414
Industrial $111 20,599,049 $2,291,926
Total $27,150,668
VII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.55
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.41
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.11

APPENDIX A

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

POLICE FEE CALCULATION
1823
I. Existing EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 214,223 3.63 1.00 58,993 58,993
Commercial 22,795 1.38 0.38 13,882,988 5,257
Industrial 18,077 0.38 0.10 72,309,782 7,467
Total 255,096 71,717
II. Projected EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 74,304 3.63 1.00 20,462 20,462
Commercial 5,773 1.38 0.38 6,893,730 2,610
Industrial 16,763 0.38 0.10 20,599,049 2,127
Total 96,840 25,200
III. Projected Facilities Costs
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Costs $25,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $0
Total Facilities Cost $25,000,000
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing Facilities Development EDU's Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 74.00% $18,499,684
New Development 25,200 26.00% $6,500,316
Total 96,917 100.00% $25,000,000
`
V. Allocation of New Development
Facility
Number of
Projected EDUs Cost to New Developmen Cost per EDU
Facilities Costs 25,200 $6,500,316 $258
VI. Calculated Fee
Land Use Type Sq. Ft/ 1,000 Sq. Ft. Units/ Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.13 20,462 $5,278,253
Commercial $98 6,893,730 $673,338
Industrial $27 20,599,049 $548,725
Total $6,500,316
VII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.13
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.10
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.03

APPENDIX A

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

FIRE FEE CALCULATION
1824
I. Existing EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 214,223 3.63 1.00 58,993 58,993
Commercial 22,795 1.38 0.38 13,882,988 5,257
Industrial 18,077 0.38 0.10 72,309,782 7,467
Total 255,096 71,717
II. Projected EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Served 1,000 Non-Res. SF per 1,000 Non-Res. S Non-Res. SF Number of EDUs Residential 74,304 3.63 1.00 20,462 20,462
Commercial 5,773 1.38 0.38 6,893,730 2,610
Industrial 16,763 0.38 0.10 20,599,049 2,127
Total 96,840 25,200
III. Projected Facilities Costs
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Costs $9,395,351
Offsetting Revenues $1,464,571
Total Facilities Cost $7,930,780
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing Facilities Development EDU's Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Existing Development 71,717 74.00% $5,868,677
New Development 25,200 26.00% $2,062,103
Total 96,917 100.00% $7,930,780
`
V. Allocation of New Development
Facility
Number of
Projected EDUs Cost to New Developmen Cost per EDU
Facilities Costs 25,200 $2,062,103 $82
VI. Calculated Fee
Land Use Type Sq. Ft/ 1,000 Sq. Ft. Units/ Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.04 20,462 $1,674,427
Commercial $31 6,893,730 $213,604
Industrial $8 20,599,049 $174,073
Total $2,062,103
VII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.04
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.03
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.01

APPENDIX A

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

LIBRARY FEE CALCULATION
1825
I. Existing EDU Calcul
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Serve 1,000 Non-Res. per 1,000 Non-Res Non-Res. S Number of EDUs Residential 214,223 3.63 1.00 58,993 58,993
Commercial
Industri
Total 214,223 58,993
II. Projected EDU Calcul
Residents per Unit/
Number of Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Number of Units/ Total Land Use Type Persons Serve 1,000 Non-Res. per 1,000 Non-Res Non-Res. S Number of EDUs Residential 74,304 3.63 1.00 20,462 20,462
Commercial
Industri
Total 74,304 20,462
III. Projected Facilitie
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Costs 204,000,000 $
Offsetting Revenu $ 9,323,18
Total Facilities 194,676,8 $ 1
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing
Development EDU's Percentage of Cost
Allocated
Percentage of Co
Allocated
Existing Development 58,993 74.25% $144,541,776
New Development 25.75 20,462 % $50,135,03
Total 100.00 79,455 % $194,676,81
`
V. Allocation of New Developm
Facility
Number of
Projected EDUs ost to New Developme Cost per EDU
Facilities C $50,135,0 20,462 3 $2,450
VI. Calculated
Land Use Type Sq. Ft/ 1,000 Sq. Ft.Units/ Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $1.26 20,462 $50,135,039
Commercial $0 0 $0
Industri $0 0 $0
Total $50,135,03
VI. Calculated Fee per S
Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $1.26
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.00
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.00

APPENDIX A

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

PARK FEE CALCULATION
1826
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 58,993 332,721
Commercial 15.28 13,882,988 212,097
Industrial 5.06 72,309,782 365,526
Total 910,344
II. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Commercial 15.28 6,893,730 105,319
Industrial 5.06 20,599,049 104,128
Total 324,853
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Cost
Facilities Cost $32,607,600
Offsetting Revenues $848,043
Total Facilities Cost $31,759,557

IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development (based on Daily Trips) Average Daily Percentage of Facility
Trips (EBUs) Cost Allocated Cost
Existing Development 910,344 73.70% $23,406,892
New Development 324,853 26.30% $8,352,665
Total Facilities Cost 1,235,197 100.00% $31,759,557
V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development (based on New EDUs) Facility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Facility Daily Trips ew Development Daily Trip
Facilities Cost 324,853 $8,352,665 $26
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 324,853 $26
VI. Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Land Use Type
Estimated Trip
Generation Rate
per Unit/
per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F.

Fee per Unit Fees per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F. Cost Financed by
Impact Fees
Residential 5.64 $145 $2,967,330
Commercial 15.28 $393 $2,707,976
Industrial 5.06 $130 $2,677,359
Initial Allocation to New Development $8,352,665
Total Allocated to Existing Development $23,406,892
Total Facilities Costs $31,759,557
VII. Fees
Land Use Fees Units / Sq. Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.07 20,462 $2,967,330
Commercial $393 6,893,730 $2,707,976
Industrial $130 20,599,049 $2,677,359
Total $8,352,665
VIII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.07
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.393
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.130
APPENDIX A-1

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

LANDSCAPE MEDIAN FEE CALCULATION
Facility
Development
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Existing Units
Existing NonResidential S.F.Average Daily EBUs
(Per Unit/1,000 SF)
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Projected Units
Projected NonResidential S.F.Average Daily EBUs
(Per Unit/1,000 SF)
1827
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 58,993 332,721
Commercial 15.28 13,882,988 212,097
Industrial 5.06 72,309,782 365,526
Total 910,344
II. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Commercial 15.28 6,893,730 105,319
Industrial 5.06 20,599,049 104,128
Total 324,853
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Cost
Facilities Cost $35,748,800
Offsetting Revenues $97,229
Total Facilities Cost $35,651,571

IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development (based on Daily Trips) Average Daily Percentage of Facility
Trips (EBUs) Cost Allocated Cost
Existing Development 910,344 73.70% $26,275,318
New Development 324,853 26.30% $9,376,253
Total Facilities Cost 1,235,197 100.00% $35,651,571
V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development (based on New EDUs) Facility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Facility Daily Trips ew Development Daily Trip
Facilities Cost 324,853 $9,376,253 $29
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 324,853 $29
VI. Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Land Use Type
Estimated Trip
Generation Rate
per Unit/
per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F.

Fee per Unit Fees per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Cost Financed by
Impact Fees
Residential 5.64 $163 $3,330,965
Commercial 15.28 $441 $3,039,829
Industrial 5.06 $146 $3,005,459
Initial Allocation to New Development $9,376,253
Total Allocated to Existing Development $26,275,318
Total Facilities Costs $35,651,571
VII. Fees
Land Use Fees Units / Sq. Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.08 20,462 $3,330,965
Commercial $441 6,893,730 $3,039,829
Industrial $146 20,599,049 $3,005,459
Total $9,376,253
VIII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.08
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.441
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.146
APPENDIX A-1

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

LOCAL ARTERIALS FEE CALCULATION
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Existing Units Existing Non-Residential S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Projected Units
Projected Non-Residential
S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
Facility
Development
1828
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 58,993 332,721
Commercial 15.28 13,882,988 212,097
Industrial 5.06 72,309,782 365,526
Total 910,344
II. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Commercial 15.28 6,893,730 105,319
Industrial 5.06 20,599,049 104,128
Total 324,853
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Cost
Facilities Cost $95,028,721
Offsetting Revenues $173,776
Total Facilities Cost $94,854,945

IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development (based on Daily Trips) Average Daily Percentage of Facility
Trips (EBUs) Cost Allocated Cost
Existing Development 910,344 73.70% $69,908,387
New Development 324,853 26.30% $24,946,558
Total Facilities Cost 1,235,197 100.00% $94,854,945
V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development (based on New EDUs) Facility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Facility Daily Trips ew Development Daily Trip
Facilities Costs 324,853 $24,946,558 $77
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 324,853 $77
VI. Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Land Use Type
Estimated Trip
Generation Rate
per Unit/
per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F.

Fee per Unit Fees per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Cost Financed by
Impact Fees
Residential 5.64 $433 $8,862,401
Commercial 15.28 $1,173 $8,087,800
Industrial 5.06 $388 $7,996,357
Initial Allocation to New Development $24,946,558
Total Allocated to Existing Development $69,908,387
Total Facilities Costs $94,854,945
VII. Fees
Land Use Fees Units / Sq. Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.22 20,462 $8,862,401
Commercial $1,173 6,893,730 $8,087,800
Industrial $388 20599048.73 $7,996,357
Total $24,946,558
VIII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.22
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $1.173
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.388
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Projected Units
Projected Non-Residential
S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
Facility
Development
APPENDIX A-1

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FEE CALCULATION
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Existing Units Existing Non-Residential S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
1829
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 58,993 332,721
Commercial 15.28 13,882,988 212,097
Industrial 5.06 72,309,782 365,526
Total 910,344
II. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 5.64 20,462 115,406
Commercial 15.28 6,893,730 105,319
Industrial 5.06 20,599,049 104,128
Total 324,853
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Cost
Facilities Cost $43,000,000
Offsetting Revenues $45,315
Total Facilities Cost $42,954,685

IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development (based on Daily Trips) Average Daily Percentage of Facility
Trips (EBUs) Cost Allocated Cost
Existing Development 910,344 73.70% $31,657,735
New Development 324,853 26.30% $11,296,950
Total Facilities Cost 1,235,197 100.00% $42,954,685
V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development (based on New EDUs) Facility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Facility Daily Trips ew Development Daily Trip
Facilities Costs 324,853 $11,296,950 $35
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 324,853 $35
VI. Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Land Use Type
Estimated Trip
Generation Rate
per Unit/
per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F.

Fee per Unit Fees per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Cost Financed by
Impact Fees
Residential 5.64 $196 $4,013,303
Commercial 15.28 $531 $3,662,528
Industrial 5.06 $176 $3,621,118
Initial Allocation to New Development $11,296,950
Total Allocated to Existing Development $31,657,735
Total Facilities Costs $42,954,685
VII. Fees
Land Use Fees Units / Sq. Ft Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $0.10 20,462 $4,013,303
Commercial $531 6,893,730 $3,662,528
Industrial $176 20,599,049 $3,621,118
Total $11,296,950
VIII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.10
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.531
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.176
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Projected Units
Projected Non-Residential
S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
Facility
Development
APPENDIX A-1

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

TRAFFIC SIGNALS FEE CALCULATION
Trip Generation
Rate per Unit/ per
1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Number of
Existing Units Existing Non-Residential S.F.

Average Daily Trips
EBUs (Per Unit/1,000
SF)
1830
I. Existing EDU Calculation
Runoff Rate Current
Land Use Type Units/Sq. Ft. Units per Acre / FAR Developed Acreage Coefficient "C" Total Unit Runoff Residential 58,993 20.0 2,950 0.60 1,770
Commercial 13,882,988 0.50 637.4 0.95 606
Industrial 72,309,782 0.30 5,533.3 0.80 4,427
Total 6,802
II. Projected EDU Calculation
Runoff Rate Current
Land Use Type Units/Sq. Ft. Units per Acre / FAR Developed Acreage Coefficient "C" Total Unit Runoff Residential 20,462 20.0 1,023 0.60 614
Commercial 6,893,730 0.50 316.5 0.95 301
Industrial 20,599,049 0.30 1,576.3 0.80 1,261
Total 2,176
III. Projected Facilities Costs
Facility Facility Cost
Facilities Costs $1,168,063,000
Offsetting Revenues $13,869,013
Total Facilities Cost $1,154,193,987
IV. Allocation of New Development to New and Existing Facilities Land Use Category
Allocation by
Total Unit Runoff
(EBUs)
Percentage New Development
Costs
Existing Development 6,802 75.77% $874,492,265
New Development 2,176 24.23% $279,701,722
Total 8,978 100.00% $1,154,193,987
V. Allocation of New Development
Facility
Number of
Projected EBUs
Cost to New
Development Cost per EBU
Facilities Costs 8,978 $1,154,193,987 $128,564
VI. Calculated Fee
Residential 0.60 $77,138 1,023 $78,920,173
Commercial 0.95 $122,136 317 $38,657,907
Industrial 0.80 $102,851 1,576 $162,123,642
Total $279,701,722
VII. Calculated Fee per Acre
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $77,138
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $122,136
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $102,851

STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
APPENDIX A-1
Total Acres Cost Financed
Land Use Category Fee
Land Use Category Rubinoff Rate
Coefficient "C"
Cost per Unit Runoff
Allocation Rate per
Acre
1831
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 208.81 58,993 12,318,358
Commercial 55.10 13,882,988 764,903
Industrial 38.26 72,309,782 2,766,674
Total 15,849,935
II. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Residential 208.81 20,462 4,272,684
Commercial 55.10 6,893,730 379,820
Industrial 38.26 20,599,049 788,148
Total 5,440,652
III. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Cost
Facilities Cost $70,649,775
Offsetting Revenues $0
Total Facilities Cost $70,649,775

IV. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Total GPDs Percentage of Facility
(EBUs) Cost Allocated Cost
Existing Development 15,849,935 74.45% $52,595,746
New Development 5,440,652 25.55% $18,054,029
Total Facilities Cost 21,290,587 100.00% $70,649,775
V. Allocation of Facilities to New Development
Facility Cost Facilities
Projected Allocated to Cost Per
Facility GPDs New Development GPD
Facilities Costs 5,440,652 $18,054,029 $3.32
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 5,440,652 $3.32
VI. Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Land Use Type
Sewer Generation Rate
per Unit/
per 1,000 Non-Res. S.F.

Fee per Unit Fees per 1,000 Non-Res.

S.F. Cost Financed by Impact
Fees
Residential 208.81 $693 $14,178,293
Commercial 55.10 $183 $1,260,378
Industrial 38.26 $127 $2,615,358
Initial Allocation to New Development $18,054,029
Total Allocated to Existing Development $52,595,746
Total Facilities Costs $70,649,775
VII. Fees
Land Use
Fees per Unit / Per 1,000
Sq. Ft. Units / Sq. Ft Sq. Ft. Costs Financed by DIF
Residential $693 20,462 39,912,787 $14,178,293
Commercial $183 6,893,730 6,893,730 $1,260,378
Industrial $127 20,599,049 20,599,049 $2,615,358
Total $18,054,029
VIII. Calculated Fee per Sq. Ft.

Land Use Fees
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) $0.36
Commercial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.183
Industrial (per Sq. Ft.) $0.127
Backup to Sewer Generation Rate - Residential
Calculation Amount
Water Usage (Gallons per Day per
Person) [a] 123
Adjustment: 85% of Total Water Usage
is Non-Irrigation [b] 0.85
Adjustment: 55% Water becomes
Wastewater [c] 0.55
Sewage Flow per Person [d] = [a] x [b] x [c] 57.50
Persons per Unit 3.63
GPD per Unit 208.81
Backup to Sewer Generation Rate - Non-Residential
Calculation Commercial Indusrial
GDP/Ac [1] [a] 1,200 500
FAR [1] [b] 0.50 0.30
Ac/Sq. Ft. [c] 43,560 43,560
GDP/Sq. Ft. [d] = [a] /([b] x [c]) 0.055 0.038
GDP/1000 Sq. Ft. [e] = [d] x 1000 55.10 38.26
[1] Fontana 2023 Sewer Master Plan
Sewer Generation Rate
per Unit/ per 1,000 NonRes. S.F.

Number of Projected
Units
Projected Non-Residential
S.F.

Total GPD "EBUs" (Per
Unit/1,000 SF)
Metric
Facility
Development
Metric
APPENDIX A-1

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

SEWER FEE CALCULATION
Sewer Generation Rate
per Unit/ per 1,000 NonRes. S.F.

Number of Existing Units Existing Non-Residential
S.F.

Total GPD "EBUs" (Per
Unit/1,000 SF)
1832

APPENDIX B
City of Fontana
DRAFT Development Impact Fee Justification Study

INVENTORY AND

FACILITIES NEEDS
LIST
1833
Facility Name Total Cost f Facility Off-setti Revenues Net Cost to City Percent of Cos
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background o
Objective
Corporate Yard Expansion (III phases of expansion) $30,000,000 $0 $30,000,000 26.00% $7,800,379CIP - North Yard/Fleet
and Facilities Building
Proposed Parking Structure (OmniTrans - 1,500 spaces) $70,000,000 $0 $70,000,000 26.00% $18,200,885
Future CIP - based
the latest parking structure costs
City Hall Improvement (Phase III Expansion) $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 26.00% $2,600,126City's General Plan 12, Goal 2Offsetting Revenue $0 $1,915,624 ($1,915,624) 26.00% ($498,086) Total $110,000,00 $1,915,62 $108,084,37 $28,103,30
Source: City of Fontana

APPENDIX B
Public Facilities (Projects over next 20 years)

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS LIST
1834

APPENDIX B
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy
Background or
Objective
Police Department - 12,000 sq ft. with furniture and fixtures ($3,300/sq ft) $40,000,000 $0 $40,000,000 26.00% $10,400,506 CIP Police Department Secure Parking Structure $40,000,000 $0 $40,000,000 26.00% $10,400,506 CIP Police Sub Station - North end of town 2000 sq ft $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 26.00% $1,300,063 CIP Police Hangar for Helicopter storage $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 26.00% $1,560,076 CIP Command Post 50 ft motor home increase the size $650,000 $0 $650,000 26.00% $169,008 CIP Police Black & White Vehicles - Fleet increase 1 vehicle per every 3 officers (30 officer) $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.00% $260,013 CIP
Armored Vehicle $400,000 $0 $400,000 26.00% $104,005 CIP Helicopter (need to have a better one due to high wind, the existing doesn't work) $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 26.00% $1,300,063 CIP Motorcycles ($45,000 each x 10) $450,000 $0 $450,000 26.00% $117,006 CIP Property Office Site Storage facility 2500 sq ft $0 $0 26.00% $0 CIP Police Substation (Metrolink) $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Offsetting Revenue $4,079,433 ($4,079,433) 26.00% ($1,060,704) Total $108,500,000 $4,079,433 $104,420,567 $24,550,542
Source: City of Fontana

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
POLICE FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Police Facilities (Projects over next 20 years)
1835
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or Objective
Station 77 Expansion to the neighboring lot with addition of apparatus bays and dorm rooms. $5,000,000 $5,000,000 26.00% $1,300,063 To assist needs for new residents based on the GP
Construction of Phase 2 station 80 fire station once development begins in Westgate Specific Plan area $15,000,000
$15,000,000 26.00% $3,900,190 GP zoning - will serve the future residents based on the GP
Two High-End Ladder Fire Trucks $2 mil each total $4 mil $4,000,000 $4,000,000 26.00% $1,040,051 Fire Department's projection to fight fire
Purchase Firecat Swat Vehicle for fire fighting $1,000,000 $1,000,000 26.00% $260,013 Fire Department's projection to fight fire
Offsetting Revenue $0 $0 26.00% $0
Total $25,000,000 $0 $25,000,000 $6,500,316
Source: City of Fontana

APPENDIX B

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Fire Facilities (Projects over next 20 years)
1836
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or
Objective
Library Facility Modernization and Expansion $1,004,936 $0 $1,004,936 26.00% $261,296 Facility Improvements and Reconfiguration $797,568 $0 $797,568 26.00% $207,378 Site Circulation $103,684 $0 $103,684 26.00% $26,959
Technology, Infrastructure, and Building
enhancements $7,178,112 $0 $7,178,112 26.00% $1,866,400 Growth-servicing library facilities $311,052 $0 $311,052 26.00% $80,877 Offsetting Revenue $1,464,571 ($1,464,571) 26.00% ($380,807) Total $9,395,351 $1,464,571 $7,930,780 $2,062,103
Source: City of Fontana

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
Library Service Facilities (Projects over next 20 years) LIBRARY FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

APPENDIX B
1837
Facility N am e Total C ost for Facility O ff-setting Revenues N et C ost to City Percent of C ost Allocated to N ew D evelopm ent C ost Allocated to N ew D evelopm ent Policy Background or O bjective N ew South Fontana Com m unity Center (Don Day) $35,000,000 $0 $35,000,000 25.75% $9,013,535 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Park Im provem ents $35,000,000 $0 $35,000,000 25.75% $9,013,535 Parks and TrailM aster Plan RecreationalTrails $35,000,000 $0 $35,000,000 25.75% $9,013,535 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Fontana Com m ons $30,000,000 $0 $30,000,000 25.75% $7,725,887 Parks and TrailM aster Plan N ew Com m unity Center in Core ofCity (Miller) $30,000,000 $0 $30,000,000 25.75% $7,725,887 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Action Park $7,500,000 $0 $7,500,000 25.75% $1,931,472 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Security Cam era U pgrades $6,500,000 $0 $6,500,000 25.75% $1,673,942 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Action Park - M artin Tudor $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 25.75% $2,575,296 Parks and TrailM aster Plan Millar Am phitheater $15,000,000 $15,000,000 25.75% $3,862,944 Parks and TrailM aster Plan O ffsetting Revenue $9,323,185 ($9,323,185) 25.75%
Total $204,000,000 $9,323,185 $194,676,815 $52,536,035
Source:City ofFontana

D EVELO PM EN T IM PACT FEES

FO N TAN A, C ALIFO RN IA
PARK FAC ILITIES N EED S LIST TH RO UGH 2043
Park Facilities (Projects over next 20 years)

APPEN D IX B
1838
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or
Objective
Landscape Medians
S Highland Ave - 600' Past Citrus to Auto Center Drive
Heading East: Construct Raised Landscape Median $2,400,000 $0 $2,400,000 26.30% $631,193 Capital Improvement Plan Valley Blvd. from Bananah Ave. to Cherry Ave. $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 26.30% $394,495 Capital Improvement Plan Mulberry Ave. from Santa Ana Ave. to Slover Ave. $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 26.30% $394,495 Capital Improvement Plan Arrow Blvd. from Citrus Ave. to Jurupa Ave. $2,400,000 $0 $2,400,000 26.30% $631,193 Capital Improvement Plan Arrow Blvd. from Palmetto Ave. to Alder Ave. $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 26.30% $394,495 Capital Improvement Plan Slover Ave. from Jasmine St to Sierra Ave $14,889,600 $0 $14,889,600 26.30% $3,915,919 Capital Improvement Plan Beech Ave. from Slover to Jurupa Ave. $3,168,000 $0 $3,168,000 26.30% $833,174 Capital Improvement Plan Beech Ave. from Baseline Ave. to Miller Ave. $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 26.30% $394,495 Capital Improvement Plan Beech Ave. from PE Trail to Foothill Blvd $630,000 $0 $630,000 26.30% $165,688 Capital Improvement Plan Sierra Lakes from San Sevaine to Beach $1,560,000 $0 $1,560,000 26.30% $410,275 Capital Improvement Plan Sierra Lakes from Lytle Creek to Catawba $1,560,000 $0 $1,560,000 26.30% $410,275 Capital Improvement Plan Offsetting Revenue $848,043 ($848,043) 26.30% ($223,033) Total $32,607,600 $848,043 $31,759,557 #REF! $8,352,665 Source: City of Fontana

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPE MEDIANS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043

APPENDIX B
1839
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or
Objective
Local Arterials
Alder Ave - from 650 feet north of Miller Ave to Miller Ave $338,000 $0 $338,000 26.30% $88,893 Capital Improvement Plan Alder Ave - from 460 feet south of Marygold Ave to Valley Blvd (West Side) $405,600 $0 $405,600 26.30% $106,672 Capital Improvement Plan Fontana Ave from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $5,168,000 $0 $5,168,000 26.30% $1,359,168 Capital Improvement Plan Fontana Ave from Poplar Ave to San Bernardino Ave $3,600,000 $0 $3,600,000 26.30% $946,789 Capital Improvement Plan Fontana Ave from San Bernardino Ave to Valley Ave $4,586,000 $0 $4,586,000 26.30% $1,206,104 Capital Improvement Plan Knox Ave - from Sierra Lakes Pkwy to S. Highland Ave $2,448,000 $0 $2,448,000 26.30% $643,816 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from San Jacinto to 320 feet north of Miller Ave $496,400 $0 $496,400 26.30% $130,552 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from Miller Ave to Foothill Blvd $1,346,400 $0 $1,346,400 26.30% $354,099 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from Foothill Blvd to 275 feet north of PE Trail $3,300,000 $0 $3,300,000 26.30% $867,890 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from Arrow Blvd to Metrolink RR $1,950,000 $0 $1,950,000 26.30% $512,844 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from Metrolink RR to Merrill Ave $770,000 $0 $770,000 26.30% $202,508 Capital Improvement Plan Locust Ave - from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $4,080,000 $0 $4,080,000 26.30% $1,073,027 Capital Improvement Plan Miller Ave - Date Ave to Cypress Ave $306,000 $0 $306,000 26.30% $80,477 Capital Improvement Plan Miller Ave - 230 feet west of Laurel Ave to Laurel Ave $156,400 $0 $156,400 26.30% $41,133 Capital Improvement Plan Miller Ave - 150 feet east of Laurel Ave to Texas Way $210,000 $0 $210,000 26.30% $55,229 Capital Improvement Plan Miller Ave - Locust Ave to Maple Ave $980,000 $0 $980,000 26.30% $257,737 Capital Improvement Plan Randall Ave. from Lime Ave. to Fontana Ave. $2,590,000 $0 $2,590,000 26.30% $681,162 Capital Improvement Plan Randall Ave from Laurel Ave to Locust Ave (North side) $1,280,000 $0 $1,280,000 26.30% $336,636 Capital Improvement Plan Randall Ave from 650 feet east of Locust Ave to Maple Ave (North side) $650,000 $0 $650,000 26.30% $170,948 Capital Improvement Plan Valley Blvd. Banana to Almond $1,088,000 $0 $1,088,000 26.30% $286,141 Capital Improvement Plan Offsetting Revenue $97,229 ($97,229) 26.30% ($25,571)
Subtotal $35,748,800 $97,229 $35,651,571 $9,376,253
Source: City of Fontana

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
LOCAL ARTERIALS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043

APPENDIX B
1840
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or
Objective
Local Arterials

CLASS I SHARED-USE PATHS
San Bernardino County Parcel from Southern California Edison Utility North to Riverside Ave $10,240,112 $0 $10,240,112 26.30% $2,693,118 Capital Improvement Plan Southern California Edison Utility North Spur I from Bridlepath Dr to SCE Utility North Spur II $5,217,850 $0 $5,217,850 26.30% $1,372,279 Capital Improvement Plan Connector Path from Wilson Ave to Southern California Edison Utility North Spur I $1,630,542 $0 $1,630,542 26.30% $428,827 Capital Improvement Plan Southern California Edison Utility North from East Ave to Sierra Ave $21,197,626 $0 $21,197,626 26.30% $5,574,910 Capital Improvement Plan SR-210 Drainage (South) from Victoria Ave to Knox Ave $8,087,756 $0 $8,087,756 26.30% $2,127,055 Capital Improvement Plan SR-210 Drainage (North) from San Sevaine Rd to Knox Ave $3,261,230 $0 $3,261,230 26.30% $857,693 Capital Improvement Plan San Sevaine Trail Extension from Pacific Electric Trail to Victoria Ave $1,630,542 $0 $1,630,542 26.30% $428,827 Capital Improvement Plan Metrolink Trail from Catawba Ave to Maple Ave $9,881,264 $0 $9,881,264 26.30% $2,598,742 Capital Improvement Plan San Sevaine Trail (South) from Philadelphia Ave to 1-10 Freeway $8,152,854 $0 $8,152,854 26.30% $2,144,176 Capital Improvement Plan Southern California Edison Utility South I from San Sevaine Trail to Rancherias Dr $2,608,925 $0 $2,608,925 26.30% $686,139 Capital Improvement Plan Southern California Edison Utility South II from Live Oak Ave to Poplar Ave $3,587,309 $0 $3,587,309 26.30% $943,451 Capital Improvement Plan Southern California Edison Utility South III form Catawba Park to Locust Av $9,783,542 $0 $9,783,542 26.30% $2,573,041 Capital Improvement Plan Subtotal $85,279,551

CLASS II BIKE LANES
Sierra Ave (Central) from Foothill Blvd to Merrill Ave $347,437 $0 $347,437 26.30% $91,375 Capital Improvement Plan Valley Blvd from Banana Ave to Alder Ave $781,771 $0 $781,771 26.30% $205,603 Capital Improvement Plan Alder Ave (North) from Shamrock to Randall Ave $437,844 $0 $437,844 26.30% $115,152 Capital Improvement Plan Cypress Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Southern California Edison Utility P $86,896 $0 $86,896 26.30% $22,853 Capital Improvement Plan Juniper Ave (Central) from Foothill Ave to Merrill Ave $173,792 $0 $173,792 26.30% $45,707 Capital Improvement Plan Jurupa Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Like Oak Ave $564,677 $0 $564,677 26.30% $148,508 Capital Improvement Plan Merrill Ave from Catawba Ave to Maple Ave $521,229 $0 $521,229 26.30% $137,082 Capital Improvement Plan Miller Ave from Beech Ave to Maple Ave $654,938 $0 $654,938 26.30% $172,247 Capital Improvement Plan Fontana Ave from Athol Ave to Randall Ave $65,977 $0 $65,977 26.30% $17,352 Capital Improvement Plan Live Oak Ave from Jurupa Ave to Fernwood Way $52,079 $0 $52,079 26.30% $13,697 Capital Improvement Plan Mulberry Ave from Jurupa Ave to Philadelphia Ave $175,547 $0 $175,547 26.30% $46,168 Capital Improvement Plan Poplar Ave (South) from Boyle St to Beech Ave $303,989 $0 $303,989 26.30% $79,948 Capital Improvement Plan Randall Ave from Lime Ave to Catawba Ave $477,781 $0 $477,781 26.30% $125,655 Capital Improvement Plan Randall Ave from Juniper Ave to Palmetto Ave $955,658 $0 $955,658 26.30% $251,335 Capital Improvement Plan San Bernardino Ave from Fontana Ave to Catawba Ave $483,048 $0 $483,048 26.30% $127,040 Capital Improvement Plan San Bernardino Ave from Juniper Ave to Alder Ave $1,209,723 $0 $1,209,723 26.30% $318,153 Capital Improvement Plan Sierra Ave from Jurupa Ave to South City Border $172,036 $0 $172,036 26.30% $45,245 Capital Improvement Plan Slover Ave from San Sevaine Trail to Sierra Ave $781,771 $0 $781,771 26.30% $205,603 Capital Improvement Plan Mango Ave (Central) from Foothill Blvd to Merrill Ave $173,792 $0 $173,792 26.30% $45,707 Capital Improvement Plan Subtotal $8,419,984

CLASS IV SEPARATED BIKEWAY CONSTRUCTION
Slover Ave from Sierra Ave to Tamarind Ave $151,995 $0 $151,995 26.30% $39,974 Capital Improvement Plan Sierra Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Jurupa Ave $407,270 $0 $407,270 26.30% $107,111 Capital Improvement Plan Jurupa Ave from Live Oak Ave to Sierra Ave $526,788 $0 $526,788 26.30% $138,544 Capital Improvement Plan Citrus Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Jurupa Ave $243,133 $0 $243,133 26.30% $63,943 Capital Improvement Plan Subtotal $1,329,185
Offsetting Revenue $173,776 ($173,776) 26.30% ($45,703) Total $95,028,721 $173,776 $94,854,945 $24,946,558
Source: City of Fontana

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043

APPENDIX B
1841
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or Objective
Traffic Signals
SIERRA RIVERSIDE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan MERRILL AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan VALLEY BLVD BEECH AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan BASELINE AVE TAMARIND AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan VALLEY BLVD ELM AVENUE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SLOVER AVE HEMLOCK AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan LIVE OAK AVE VILLAGE DR $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan FOOTHILL BLVD BEECH AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan BEECH AVE SR-210 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan CHERRY AVE BANANA AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan BEECH AVE MILLER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan ARROW BLVD LAUREL AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan ALDER AVE MARYGOLD AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SANTA ANA AVEALMOND AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SAN BERNARDINO OLEANDER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SAN BERNARDINO MANGO AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SAN BERNARDINO CATAWBA AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan CHERRY AVE VILLAGE DR $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SOUTH HIGHLAND JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SLOVER AVE POPLAR AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan MILLER AVE LOCUST AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SLOVER AVE BANANA AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan CHERRY AVE SUMMIT AVENUE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan RANDALL AVE MANGO AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan RANDALL AVE FONTANA AVE/CATAWBA $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan JUNIPER AVE VALENCIA AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan MILLER AVE MANGO AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SLOVER AVE ELM AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SOUTH HIGHLAND ALMERIA AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SOUTH HIGHLAND KNOX AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan MILLER AVE JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan RANDALL AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan BEECH AVE WALNUT AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan WALNUT AVE JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan RANDALL AVE OLEANDER AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan BEECH AVE KRISTINE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SUMMIT AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SANTA ANA AVE ALMOND AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan MARLAY AVE PACIFIC AVE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan CYPRESS AVE WALNUT STREET $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SOUTH HERITAGE WEST LIBERTY PKWY $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan SOUTH HERITAGE EAST LIBERTY PKWY $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan RANDALL AVE PEPPER ST $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 26.30% $262,997 Future Traffic Signals Master Plan Offsetting Revenue $45,315 ($45,315) 26.30% ($11,918) Future Traffic Signals Master Plan Total $43,000,000 $45,315 $42,954,685 $11,296,950
Source: City of Fontana

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
TRAFFIC SIGNALS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043

APPENDIX B
1842
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of
Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy
Background
or Objective
AOS 1 $898,928,000 $0 $898,928,000 24.23% $217,841,812
AOS 2 $131,702,000 $0 $131,702,000 24.23% $31,916,018
AOS 3 $137,433,000 $0 $137,433,000 24.23% $33,304,841
Offsetting Revenue $13,869,013 ($13,869,013) 24.23% ($3,360,949) Total $1,168,063,000 $13,869,013 $1,154,193,987 $279,701,722 Source: City of Fontana
Storm Drain Facilities

APPENDIX B

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
1843
Facility Name Total Cost for
Facility [1]
Off-setting
Revenues Net Cost to City
Percent of Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Policy Background or
Objective
Sewer Facilities
Diversion Structures
San Bernardino Ave and Citrus Ave $0 $0 $0 26.30% $0
San Bernardino Ave and Poplar Ave $0 $0 $0 26.30% $0
Cypress Ave and Baseline Ave $0 $0 $0 26.30% $0
Palmetto Ave and Valley Blvd $148,800 $0 $148,800 26.30% $39,134 Alder Ave and Hawthorne Ave $148,800 $0 $148,800 26.30% $39,134 Subtotal $297,600
Pipelines
Alder Ave. and Hawthorne Ave $777,713 $0 $777,713 26.30% $204,536 Granada Ave. and Alder Ave. $2,831,850 $0 $2,831,850 26.30% $744,768 Marygold Ave. and Palmetto Ave. $906,750 $0 $906,750 26.30% $238,472 Juniper Ave. and Randall Ave. $2,480,775 $0 $2,480,775 26.30% $652,436 Oleander Ave. and Orange Way $830,025 $0 $830,025 26.30% $218,294 Gravity Collectors and Local Street Sewer Improvements $13,078,125 $0 $13,078,125 26.30% $3,439,506 Downtown Core $9,150,038 $0 $9,150,038 26.30% $2,406,432 Westgate SP Phase 1 $2,501,700 $0 $2,501,700 26.30% $657,939 Westgate SP Phase 2 $1,970,438 $0 $1,970,438 26.30% $518,219 Arboretum SP $754,463 $0 $754,463 26.30% $198,421
Tamarind Ave. and Grevillea St. $1,479,863 $0 $1,479,863 26.30% $389,199 Alder Ave. and Pine Ave. $1,499,625 $0 $1,499,625 26.30% $394,397 Maple Ave $7,387,688 $0 $7,387,688 26.30% $1,942,939
Gravity Collectors and Local Street Sewer Improvements $13,078,125 $0 $13,078,125 26.30% $3,439,506 Subtotal $58,727,175
Lift Stations
Southridge Lift Station $4,650,000 $0 $4,650,000 26.30% $1,222,936 Tamarind $3,487,500 $0 $3,487,500 26.30% $917,202
11th St and Linden Lift Station $3,487,500 $0 $3,487,500 26.30% $917,202 Subtotal $11,625,000
Offsetting Revenue $0 $0 26.30% $0
Total $70,649,775 $0 $70,649,775 $18,580,673
Source: City of Fontana
[1] Includes 6.25% to account for cost increase from Dec 2023 to Dec 2025 per California Construction Cost Index, and 10% to account for Administration and Environmental costs related to the project.

APPENDIX B

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
SEWER NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
1844

APPENDIX C
City of Fontana
DRAFT Development Impact Fee Justification Study

C ITY OF FONTA NA

CA PITAL

IMPR OVEMENT LIST
1845
City of Fontana Capital Improvement List
2026-2027
The City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies the public infrastructure necessary to accommodate future growth while maintaining the level of service established by the City Council. The CIP serves as the planning and implementation framework for the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program and identifies the public facilities reasonably required to mitigate the impacts generated by future development.

The projects included in this Capital Improvement Program (CIP) have been evaluated to determine whether they are reasonably related to the anticipated growth identified in the City's General Plan, Specific Plans, Housing Element, Transportation Plans, Storm Drain and Sewer Master Plans, Parks Master Plan, and other adopted planning documents. The CIP also incorporates recommendations derived from engineering studies, traƯic analyses, utility and infrastructure assessments, and other technical and administrative information developed by City staƯ and professional consultants. Following review and consideration by the City Council, this CIP serves as the City's oƯicial longrange planning document for identifying public infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate future growth, maintain adopted levels of service, preserve public assets, enhance public safety, and support the community's long-term development objectives.

The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is intended to serve as the technical foundation supporting the City's Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and will be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changes in development projections, construction costs, adopted planning documents, completed projects, funding availability, and applicable legal requirements. Because future development patterns, travel demand, funding opportunities, and infrastructure needs are inherently uncertain, the CIP does not identify specific construction schedules or anticipated completion dates for individual projects. Project implementation will be prioritized and scheduled based on development activity, available funding, operational needs, engineering evaluations, and City Council direction.

The inclusion of a project in this CIP does not constitute a determination that the project currently satisfies all applicable engineering criteria, operational thresholds, regulatory requirements, or warrants for construction. Rather, the CIP identifies public infrastructure improvements that may become necessary to accommodate future growth and maintain the City's adopted level-of-service objectives.

Individual projects—including, but not limited to, traƯic signals, intersection improvements, roadway widenings, and other transportation facilities—will be subject to separate engineering analyses, warrant evaluations, environmental review, funding availability, and all applicable federal, state, and local approval requirements before design or construction is authorized. 1846
PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility Corporate Yard Expansion (Public Works North yard) $30,000,000 Proposed Parking Structure (Metro Station - 1,500 spaces) $70,000,000 City Hall (Phase III Expansion – Energy EƯiciency & Sustainability Project) $10,000,000 POLICE FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility Police Department – add 3,300/sq ft TI work for additional PDs $40,000 Police Department Secure Parking Structure $40,000
Police Sub Station - North end of town 2000 sq ft $5,000,000 Police Hangar for Helicopter storage $6,000,000
Command Post 50 ft motor home increase the size $650,000 Police Black & White Vehicles - Fleet increase 1 vehicle per every 3 oƯicers (30 oƯicers) $1,000,000 Armored Vehicle $400,000
Helicopter (for high wind situation) $5,000,000
Motorcycles ($45,000 each x 10) $450,000
Property OƯice Site Storage facility 2500 sq ft $0
Police Substation (Metrolink) $10,000,000
FIRE FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility Station 77 Expansion to the neighboring lot with addition of apparatus bays and dorm rooms $5,000,000 1847
Construction of Phase 2 station 80 fire station once development begins in Westgate Specific Plan area $12,000,000 Two High-End Ladder Fire Trucks $2 mil each total $4 mil to support additional population $4,000,000 Purchase Firecat Swat Vehicle for fire fighting $1,000,000 LIBRARY FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility Library Facility Modernization and Expansion (STEAM Learning Center) $1,004,936 Facility Improvements and Reconfiguration (STEAM Learning Center) $797,568 Site Circulation $103,684
Technology, Infrastructure, and Building enhancements (STEAM Learning Center) $7,178,112 Growth-servicing library facilities $311,052
PARKS FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility New South Fontana Community Center (Don Day) $35,000,000 Park Improvements – See Park and Recreational Trail Master Plan $35,000,000 Recreational Trails – See Park and Recreational Trail Master Plan $35,000,000 New Community Center in Core of City (Miller) $30,000,000 Action Park - North or Mid portion of Fontana $7,500,000 Security Camera Upgrades $6,500,000
Action Park – Martin Tudor $10,000,000
Millar Amphitheater $15,000,000
1848
LANDSCAPE MEDIANS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility S Highland Ave - 600' Past Citrus to Auto Center Drive Heading East: Construct Raised Landscape Median $2,400,000 Valley Blvd. from Banana Ave. to Cherry Ave. $1,500,000 Mulberry Ave. from Santa Ana Ave. to Slover Ave. $1,500,000 Arrow Blvd. from Citrus Ave. to Jurupa Ave. $2,400,000
Arrow Blvd. from Palmetto Ave. to Alder Ave. $1,500,000 Slover Ave. from Jasmine St to Sierra Ave $14,889,600
Beech Ave. from Slover to Jurupa Ave. $3,168,000
Beech Ave. from Baseline Ave. to Miller Ave. $1,500,000 Beech Ave. from PE Trail to Foothill Blvd $630,000
Sierra Lakes from San Sevaine to Beach $1,560,000
Sierra Lakes from Lytle Creek to Catawba $1,560,000
LOCAL ARTERIALS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name Total Cost for Facility
Alder Ave - from 650 feet north of Miller Ave to Miller Ave $338,000 Alder Ave - from 460 feet south of Marygold Ave to Valley Blvd (West Side) $405,600 Fontana Ave from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $5,168,000
Fontana Ave from Poplar Ave to San Bernardino Ave $3,600,000 Fontana Ave from San Bernardino Ave to Valley Ave $4,586,000 Knox Ave - from Sierra Lakes Pkwy to S. Highland Ave $2,448,000 Locust Ave - from San Jacinto to 320 feet north of Miller Ave $496,400 1849
Locust Ave - from Miller Ave to Foothill Blvd $1,346,400 Locust Ave - from Foothill Blvd to 275 feet north of PE Trail $3,300,000 Locust Ave - from Arrow Blvd to Metrolink RR $1,950,000 Locust Ave - from Metrolink RR to Merrill Ave $770,000
Locust Ave - from Merrill Ave to Randall Ave $4,080,000 Miller Ave - Date Ave to Cypress Ave $306,000
Miller Ave - 230 feet west of Laurel Ave to Laurel Ave $156,400 Miller Ave - 150 feet east of Laurel Ave to Texas Way $210,000 Miller Ave - Locust Ave to Maple Ave $980,000
Randall Ave. from Lime Ave. to Fontana Ave. $2,590,000
Randall Ave from Laurel Ave to Locust Ave (North side) $1,280,000 Randall Ave from 650 feet east of Locust Ave to Maple Ave (North side) $650,000 Valley Blvd. Banana to Almond $1,088,000
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name (Projects over next 20 yrs) Total Cost for Facility

CLASS I SHARED-USE PATHS
San Bernardino County Parcel from Southern California Edison Utility North to Riverside Ave $10,240,112 Southern California Edison Utility North Spur I from Bridlepath Dr to SCE Utility North Spur II $5,217,850 Connector Path from Wilson Ave to Southern California Edison Utility North Spur I $1,630,542 Southern California Edison Utility North from East Ave to Sierra Ave $21,197,626 SR-210 Drainage (South) from Victoria Ave to Knox Ave $8,087,756 SR-210 Drainage (North) from San Sevaine Rd to Knox Ave $3,261,230 San Sevaine Trail Extension from Pacific Electric Trail to Victoria Ave $1,630,542 1850
Metrolink Trail from Catawba Ave to Maple Ave $9,881,264 San Sevaine Trail (South) from Philadelphia Ave to 1-10 Freeway $8,152,854 Southern California Edison Utility South I from San Sevaine Trail to Rancherias Dr $2,608,925 Southern California Edison Utility South II from Live Oak Ave to Poplar Ave $3,587,309 Southern California Edison Utility South III from Catawba Park to Locust Ave $9,783,542

CLASS II BIKE LANES
Sierra Ave (Central) from Foothill Blvd to Merrill Ave $347,437 Valley Blvd from Banana Ave to Alder Ave $781,771
Alder Ave (North) from Shamrock to Randall Ave $437,844 Cypress Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Southern California Edison Utility Path $86,896 Juniper Ave (Central) from Foothill Ave to Merrill Ave $173,792 Jurupa Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Live Oak Ave $564,677
Merrill Ave from Catawba Ave to Maple Ave $521,229
Miller Ave from Beech Ave to Maple Ave $654,938
Fontana Ave from Athol Ave to Randall Ave $65,977
Live Oak Ave from Jurupa Ave to Fernwood Way $52,079
Mulberry Ave from Jurupa Ave to Philadelphia Ave $175,547 Poplar Ave (South) from Boyle St to Beech Ave $303,989
Randall Ave from Lime Ave to Catawba Ave $477,781
Randall Ave from Juniper Ave to Palmetto Ave $955,658
San Bernardino Ave from Fontana Ave to Catawba Ave $483,048 San Bernardino Ave from Juniper Ave to Alder Ave $1,209,723 Sierra Ave from Jurupa Ave to South City Border $172,036 1851
Slover Ave from San Sevaine Trail to Sierra Ave $781,771 Mango Ave (Central) from Foothill Blvd to Merrill Ave $173,792

CLASS IV SEPARATED BIKEWAY CONSTRUCTION
Slover Ave from Sierra Ave to Tamarind Ave $151,995
Sierra Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Jurupa Ave $407,270 Jurupa Ave from Live Oak Ave to Sierra Ave $526,788
Citrus Ave (South) from Slover Ave to Jurupa Ave $243,133 TRAFFIC SIGNALS NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
Facility Name Total Cost for Facility
SIERRA RIVERSIDE $1,000,000
MERRILL AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000
VALLEY BLVD BEECH AVE $1,000,000
BASELINE AVE TAMARIND AVE $1,000,000
VALLEY BLVD ELM AVENUE $1,000,000
SLOVER AVE HEMLOCK AVE $1,000,000
LIVE OAK AVE VILLAGE DR $1,000,000
FOOTHILL BLVD BEECH AVE $1,000,000
BEECH AVE SR-210 $1,000,000
CHERRY AVE BANANA AVE $1,000,000
BEECH AVE MILLER AVE $1,000,000
ARROW BLVD LAUREL AVE $1,000,000
ALDER AVE MARYGOLD AVE $1,000,000
1852
SANTA ANA AVE ALMOND AVE $1,000,000
SAN BERNARDINO OLEANDER AVE $1,000,000
SAN BERNARDINO MANGO AVE $1,000,000
SAN BERNARDINO CATAWBA AVE $1,000,000
CHERRY AVE VILLAGE DR $1,000,000
SOUTH HIGHLAND JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000
SLOVER AVE POPLAR AVE $1,000,000
MILLER AVE LOCUST AVE $1,000,000
SLOVER AVE BANANA AVE $1,000,000
CHERRY AVE SUMMIT AVENUE $1,000,000
RANDALL AVE MANGO AVE $1,000,000
RANDALL AVE FONTANA AVE/CATAWBA $1,000,000
JUNIPER AVE VALENCIA AVE $1,000,000
MILLER AVE MANGO AVE $1,000,000
SLOVER AVE ELM AVE $1,000,000
SOUTH HIGHLAND ALMERIA AVE $1,000,000
SOUTH HIGHLAND KNOX AVE $1,000,000
MILLER AVE JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000
RANDALL AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000
BEECH AVE WALNUT AVE $1,000,000
WALNUT AVE JUNIPER AVE $1,000,000
RANDALL AVE OLEANDER AVE $1,000,000
BEECH AVE KRISTINE $1,000,000
SUMMIT AVE CYPRESS AVE $1,000,000
1853
SANTA ANA AVE ALMOND AVE $1,000,000
MARLAY AVE PACIFIC AVE $1,000,000
CYPRESS AVE WALNUT STREET $1,000,000
SOUTH HERITAGE WEST LIBERTY PKWY $1,000,000
SOUTH HERITAGE EAST LIBERTY PKWY $1,000,000
RANDALL AVE PEPPER ST $1,000,000
SEWER NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
YEAR 0 TO YEAR 5
Facility Name Proj. ID Description of Improvement Est. Proj. Cost Diversion Structures
San Bernardino Ave and Citrus Ave (1) - Change diversion of splitter box. Reconfigure flow direction westerly (MH ID: I24_70) $0 San Bernardino Ave and Poplar Ave (1) - Change diversion of splitter box. Reconfigure flow direction westerly (MH ID: H24_88) $0 Cypress Ave and Baseline Ave (1) - Change diversion of splitter box. Reconfigure flow direction westerly (MH ID: I26_28) $0 Palmetto Ave and Valley Blvd H-1 Install diversion stop plate to divert flow into southerly parallel line $128,000 Alder Ave and Hawthorne Ave H-3 Install diversion structure to split half flow into Hawthorne Ave and half into Alder Ave $128,000 Pipelines
Alder Ave and Hawthorne Ave H-2 Replace ±1,350 LF of 6" dia. pipe with 10" dia. pipe $669,000 Granada Ave and Alder Ave H-4 Replace ±2,400 LF of 8"-12" dia. pipe with 12" and 15" dia. pipe $2,436,000 Marygold Ave and Palmetto Ave H-5 Replace ±1,300 LF of 10" dia. pipe with 15" dia. pipe $780,000 Juniper Ave and Randall Ave H-6 Replace ±2,650 LF of 18" dia. pipe with 24" dia. pipe $2,134,000 Oleander Ave and Orange Way H-7 Lower invert elevation of manhole L21_22 to increase slope and $714,000 maximize pipe capacity prior to RR crossing. Replace ±1,000 LF of 12" 1854
dia. pipe and ±300 LF of 10" dia. pipe.

Gravity Collectors and Local Street Sewer Imprv. - Proposed 25,000 LF of 8" dia. Pipe $11,250,000 Downtown Core - Refer to Appendix A $7,871,000
* Apply 10% of Admin and Env Cost to the project
* Apply 6.25% of cost increase from Dec 2023 to Dec 2025 per California Construction Cost Index SEWER NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2043
YEAR 6 TO YEAR 20
Facility Name Proj. ID Description of Improvement Est. Proj. Cost Pipelines
Westgate SP Phase 1 H-8 Proposed ±2,520 of 10" dia. and 1,600± of 12" dia. backbone piping for Westgate SP $2,152,000 Westgate SP Phase 2 H-9 Proposed ±3,000 of 12" dia. backbone piping for Westgate SP $1,695,000 Arboretum SP H-10 Proposed ±1,310 of 10" dia. backbone piping for Arboretum Specific Plan $649,000 Tamarind Ave. and Grevillea St. H-11 Replace ±1,900 LF of 15" dia. pipe with 18" dia. pipe $1,273,000 Alder Ave and Pine Ave H-12 Replace ±2,150 LF of 12" dia. pipe with 15" dia. pipe $1,290,000 Maple Ave S-2 Proposed ±2,650 LF of 15" dia. pipe, ±2,650 LF of 12" dia. pipe, $6,355,000 and ±6,600 of 10" dia. pipe
Gravity Collectors and Local Street Sewer Improv. - Proposed 25,000 LF of 8" dia. Pipe $11,250,000 Lift Stations
Southridge Lift Station - Proposed 2.0 MGD LS (1.7 MGD firm capacity) $4,000,000 Tamarind L-1 Proposed 1.7 MGD LS (1.3 MGD firm capacity) $3,000,000 11th St and Linden Lift Station IDI development Treating IDI development Sewer - Lift Station $3,000,000 1855
* Apply 10% of Admin and Env Cost to the project
* Apply 6.25% of cost increase from Dec 2023 to Dec 2025 per California Construction Cost Index 1856
City of Fontana

PARKS FACILITIES NEEDS LIST T
THROUGH 2043
I. Park Improvements (Existing Parks)
Construction Costs A&E Costs Total Costs Priority Level Almeria Park $385,000
2 new ADA inclusive Playground Structures $350,000 $35,000 High Cambria Park $605,000
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low New Park Gazebo $150,000 $15,000 Low
Catawba Park $440,000
New Restrooms $300,000 $30,000 High
Resurface Parking $100,000 $10,000 Low
Chaparral Park $753,500
Shelter Roof Renovation $85,000 $8,500 Moderate
New Restroom $300,000 $30,000 High
New ADA Inclusive Playground w/ shade Structure $300,000 $30,000 Moderate Condor Park $165,000
Full coverage playground shade structure $150,000 $15,000 Moderate Coyote Canyon Park $1,419,000
Add shade at ballfield dugouts (6) $150,000 $15,000 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low Replace rubber playground safety surfacing $80,000 $8,000 Low Add shade for ballfield spectator areas (6) $360,000 $36,000 Low Ballfield Score Boards (3) $450,000 $45,000 Moderate
Fiesta Park $412,500
Playground Shade Structure $100,000 $10,000 High
Replace rubber playground safety surfacing $75,000 $7,500 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $200,000 $20,000 Low Fontana Park $330,000
Shaded spectator areas for the pool deck (2) $300,000 $30,000 Low Dr. Charles Koehler Park $572,000
ADA Playground w/ shade & Improvements $400,000 $40,000 Moderate Resurface Parking Lot $120,000 $12,000 Low
Heritage Circle Park $731,000
Security Lighting $200,000 $20,000 High
Renovate Restroom $150,000 $15,000 High
Fitness Trail $200,000 $36,000 Moderaate
New Park Gazebo $100,000 $10,000 High
Heritage Tot Lot West $385,000
Playground Shade Structure $100,000 $10,000 High
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low Hunter's Ridge $632,500
Snack Bar Roof Improvement $100,000 $10,000 Moderate
Resurface Parking Lot $120,000 $12,000 Low
Add Shade at Ballfield Dugouts (2) $30,000 $3,000 High
Full Coverage Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 Low Add shade for ballfield spectator areas (2) $175,000 $17,500 Low Martin Tudor Regional Park $3,135,000
Park Rehabilitation $450,000 $45,000 High
Resurface Parking Lot $100,000 $10,000 High
Sewer Extension $300,000 $30,000 High
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
Replace rubber playground safety surfacing $100,000 $10,000 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 High Bicycle Pump Track Action Park $1,500,000 $150,000 High Jurupa Hills Open space Park $330,000
Hillside Stabilization above the splash Pad $200,000 $20,000 Low Wilderness Trails $100,000 $10,000 Moderate
1857

PARKS FACILITIES NEEDS LIST T
THROUGH 2043
Mary Vagle Museum and Nature Center $165,000
Resurface Existing Parking Lot $150,000 $15,000 High
McDermott Sports Park $385,000
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
ADA Playground Structure $200,000 $20,000 High
McDermott Soccer Park $2,787,500
Replace Fence $225,000 $22,500 High
Resurface Parking Lot $150,000 $15,000 Low
Shade Structures $250,000 $25,000 Moderate
Artifical Turf $2,000,000 $100,000 Low
Miller Park $20,460,000
New outdoor pool facility $2,500,000 $250,000 Low
New Indoor Pool Facility $400,000 $40,000 Low
Gymnasium with two indoor basketball courts Courts $15,000,000 $1,500,000 Low Indoor racketball courts $300,000 $30,000 Low
Amphitheature seating with Dance Area $400,000 $40,000 Low North Heritage Park $687,500
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
Replace rubber playground safety surfacing $75,000 $7,500 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low Lighting $150,000 $15,000 High
North Tamarind Park $110,000
ADA sidewalk improvements $100,000 $10,000 High
Oak Park $825,000
Restroom Improvement $150,000 $15,000 High
Security Lights $150,000 $15,000 High
Shelter Roof $50,000 $5,000 Moderate
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 Moderate
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Moderate Patricia Marrujo Park $770,000
Playground Shade Structures (2) $200,000 $20,000 Moderate New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Moderate New Park Gazebos (2) $250,000 $25,000 Moderate
Patricia Murry Park $550,000
Playground Shade Structure $100,000 $10,000 High
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Moderate New Park Gazebo (2) $150,000 $15,000 Moderate
Ralph M. Lewis Park $704,000
New Football Goal Posts with Catch Net Systems(8) $640,000 $64,000 High Rosena East Park $1,210,000
Playground Shade Structures (2) $400,000 $40,000 High
New Park Gazebo $100,000 $10,000 Low
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structures (2) $600,000 $60,000 Low Rosena West Park $528,000
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
Replace rubber playground safety surfacing $80,000 $8,000 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low San Sevaine $715,000
Resurface Parking Lot $200,000 $20,000 Low
Full Coverage Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 Low Upgrade Existing Park Exercise Equipment $150,000 $15,000 Low New Park Gazebo $150,000 $15,000 Low
Seville Park $880,000
Resurface Parking Lot $100,000 $10,000 Low
Remove the old amphitheater and stage $150,000 $15,000 Low New Pickle Ball Courts (4) $400,000 $40,000 Low
ADA sidewalk improvements $150,000 $15,000 Low
Shadow Park $440,000
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 Moderate
New ADA Playground Improvements $250,000 $25,000 Moderate 1858

PARKS FACILITIES NEEDS LIST T
THROUGH 2043
Southridge Park and Don Day Community Center $715,000
Resurface Existing Parking Lot $100,000 $10,000 Low
Shade for Ballfield Spectator Areas (4) $300,000 $30,000 Low New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Low Sycamore Hills Park $605,000
Playground Shade Structure (2) $300,000 $30,000 High
New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 High Village Park $1,630,000
Playground Shade Structure $150,000 $15,000 High
Replace roof on Park Gazebo $100,000 $10,000 High
Shade for Ballfield Spectator Areas (4) $250,000 $25,000 High New ADA Inclusive Playground Structure $250,000 $25,000 Moderate Expand Parking $250,000 $25,000 Moderate
ADA sidewalk improvements $50,000 $150,000 Moderate
Ballfield Score Boards(3) $300,000 $30,000 Moderate
VOH Pool Facility $330,000
Spectator Shade Structure (2) $300,000 $30,000 High
General Park Camera Based Security for Parks $165,000
Annual Security up grades to parks $150,000 $15,000 High $40,815,000 $4,142,500 $44,957,500
1859

PARKS FACILITIES NEEDS LIST T
THROUGH 2043
II. New Community Facilities
Sq. Ft. Construction
Costs A&E Costs Total Costs Priority Level
$650.00 /SF
Renovated Don Day Community Center $28,080,000
40,000 $26,000,000 $2,080,000 Moderate
$28,080,000
4-2
IV. New Parks
Acres Land Costs Construction
Costs A&E Costs Total Costs Priority Level
$600,000 /Acre $750,000 /Acre
Arboretum Parks $7,722,000
13 $7,150,000 $572,000 Moderate
Downtown Linear Park on P.E. Trail $1,603,800

2.7 $1,485,000 $118,800 Moderate
Sierra Lakes Sports Park $35,820,000
30 $18,000,000 $16,500,000 $1,320,000 Moderate
Westgate Parks $11,309,760

19.04 $10,472,000 $837,760 Moderate
$56,455,560
III. Recreation Trails
Acres Construction
Costs A&E Costs Total Costs Priority Level
$450,000 /Acre
Hiking and Biking Trails (12" Wide)
Sec Utility Corridor 8.73 $3,928,500 $392,850 $4,321,350 Low Joint Use Trail (27' Wide)
San Sevaine Creek Channel 33.71 $15,169,500 $758,475 $15,927,975 Low $20,249,325
1860

STORM DRAIN FACILITIES NEEDS LIST
THROUGH 2043
1861
Path: P:\F\FONT00000121\0600INFO\GS\Maps\ProposedCapitalImprovementProjects.aprx Capital Improvement Project Prioritization Scores
All Areas of Study
Fontana
Alamo Dr
Day Creek Blvd Day Creek Blvd
Bluegrass Ave
Stoneview Rd
Wilson Ave
Altura Dr
Alvarado Pl
Dapple Dr
Melon Dr
Indian Wells Pl
John L. Golden
Day Creek
Vintage Dr
Sugargum St
Carob Ave
Banyan St
Day Creek Blvd
Arbor Ln
Hess Pl
Day Creek
Blvd
Victoria
Gardens
Fire Station No.
3 Historic Winery
(Regina/Filippi)
Cultural
Center/Biane
Library
66 Day Creek Blvd
Juneberry Dr
Foothill
Marketplace
Concours St
6th St
Southe rn Pacific RR
Shea Center Dr
Santa Ana St
Union Pacific
Railroad
Up
Railroad
S Vintage
Ave
S Vintage
Ave
E Francis St
Universe Dr
Forest Service Rd Decliff Dr
Encino Ct
East Etiwanda Creek
East Ave
Etiwanda A
ve
Etiwanda Ave
Etiwanda
Ave
Daycreek Blvd
N Overlook Dr
23rd St
Amber Ln
Altura Dr
Arena Dr
Parke Cir
Stil wl ater Pl
W Wilson Ave
ilson Ave Wilson Ave
Summit
Intermediate
Etiwanda
Colony
Fire Station No.
6 210
Copley Dr
Victoria St
Pecan Ave
Carnesi Dr
N Victoria
Windrows Lo po
Highland Ave
Countrywood Pl
Blue Gum Dr
Arapaho Rd
Cherokee Rd
Laurel Blosso
m Pl
Fisher Dr
DiCarlo Pl
Pistache St
Plum
Way
Silver Sky Rd
Victoria
Park Ln
East Ave
Eti
wanda Ave
Banyan St
Etiwanda
15 W
Liberty
Pkwy
Miller Ave
Sutter Ct
Church St
Kew
Ave
Pecan
Ave
Pinot Pl
Mosaic Dr Colonial Dr
Garcia Dr
East Ave East Ave
Baseline Rd
Victoria
Gardens Ln
Victoria Arbors
Park
Perdew
Etiwanda Depot
Chaffey-Garcia
House
Post Office
Police
Substation
66 66
Ilex St
Cotton
wood
Ave
Napa St
Ivy Ave
Chatham Dr
Hickory Ave
Flagstaff Dr
Joliet Dr
Cornwall
Ave
Whittram Ave
Arrow Rte
Etiwanda Ave
Foothill Blvd
Kaiser Way
Transportation Way
Access Rd
Access Rd
Barrington Ave
Vip Rd
6th St
San Bernardino Ave
Valley Blvd
N
Etiwanda Ave
Com
merce Dr
4th St
Etiwanda
Ave
Southern Pacific RR Union Pacific
10 10 10
Jasmine St
Commerce Way
Commerce Way
Santa Ana St
Valley Blvd
Slover Ave
N Etiwanda Ave
E Airport Dr
S Et wi anda Ave
Fontana
Gateway
Dahlia St
Industry Ave
Champagne Ave E Francis St Marlay Ave
Chablis Ave
Jurupa St
Jurupa Ave
S Etiwanda Ave
V
Inland Ave
enture
Dr
Latour Ln
Philadelphia Ave Philadelphia Ave Philadelphia Ave
Colonbero Rd
Woodley Ridge Dr
Decliff Dr
Summit Ave
Regina Dr
East Etiwanda
Creek
Wardman Bullock Rd
Crescenta Way
San Sevaine
Rd
Rid
geline
Pl
Cres
tline Pl
Aggazzotti Rd
Frost Dr
Johnston Pl
Cherry A
ve
Wilson Ave
210
15 15
Victoria St
Smokestone St
Raindrop Pl
Copley Dr
Fisher Dr
Gypsum Dr
Highland Ave
Cherry
Ave
Banyan St
Westgate E Liberty Pkwy
W
Lincoln Loop Rd
E Lincoln Loop
Rd
Heritage Cir
W
Yosemite Loop Rd
E Grand
Ave
Del Norte St
Marbella St
W Liberty Pkwy
W Liberty
Pkwy
Quail Ct
Rideout Ct
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trl
Cherry Ave
Baseline Ave
Heritage
Intermediate
School
Village Of
Heritage
Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railroad
66 66
Calabash
Ave
Back Straight Rd
Ivy Ave
Owen St
Banana Ave
Almond Ave
W Perimeter Rd
Cherry Ave Cherry Ave
Cherry Ave
Whittram Ave
Arrow Rte Arrow Blvd
Foothill Blvd
Almond Ave
California Steel Way
Banana Ave
S Perimeter Rd
Iris Dr
Calabash
Ave
W Perimeter Rd
San Bernardino Ave
Auto Club
Speedway
Kaiser Park
10 10
Business Dr
Santa Ana AveBanana
Ave
Almond Ave
Almond Ave
Calabash Ave
Calabash Ave
Slover Ave
Valley Blvd Valley Blvd
Cherry
Ave
Mulberry Ave
Marlay Ave
Almond Ave
Calabash
Ave
Calabash Ave
Chaparral Ave
Cabernet Dr
El Contento Ave
Hillcrest Dr
Jurupa Ave
Mulberry Ave
Cherry Ave
Cherry Ave
Shadow Park
Chaparral Park
Oak Park
Kaiser High
School
Southridge
Middle School
Green Vista Dr
Vintage Pl
Chablis
Ave
Hadley Dr
Tamarack Way
Weeping Willow Ln
Duncan Canyon Rd
Tahan Way
Brookside
Ave
Coyote
Canyon Rd
Foxborough Dr
Bridlepath Dr
Coyote Canyon
15 Lytle Creek Rd
Coyote Canyon
Rd
S Bridlepath Dr
Summit Ave
Summit Ave
Cherry
Ave
Fox Ridge Dr
W
rangler Dr
San Sevaine Rd
Tenderfo
ot
Dr
Deer Dr
Hawk St
Half Dome Dr
Roosevelt Dr
Reagan Dr
Saddlepeak Dr
Beech Ave
Rosena Park
East
David W Long
Elementary
Summit Heights
Hunter's Ridge
Preston Dr
Hemlock Ave
San Sevaine Rd
Walnut St
Walnut St
Earhart Ave
Maine St Holiday Dr
Caroline St
Brant Dr
Curtis Ave
Larkstone St
Lytle Creek Rd
Rockwell Ave
Horizon St
Chantel Dr
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
Walnut Ave
Beech Ave
S Highland Ave
California
Landings
Beech Ave
Hilton Dr
Hemlock
Ave He
mlock Ave
Andrea St
Live Oak Ave San Seva
ine
Rd
Plumrose St
Sandhurst St
Bar Harbor Rd
M
cGuire Ave
Sea Salt Ave
Miller Ave
Arosia Dr
Montanez St
Myrtle Pl
Beech Ave Beech Ave
Sultana Ave
Begonia Dr
Village Pkwy
Miller Ave
Plumaria Dr
Baseline Ave Rancho
Fontana
Morningside
66 Sultana
Ave
Hemlock Ave
Redwood Ave Redwood Ave
Elm Ave
Ceres Ave
Yucca Ave
Live Oak
Ave
Live Oak Ave
Reseda
Ave
Heather Ave
Valencia Ave
Country Ln
Seville Ave
Orchid St
Upland Ave
Ivy Ave
Merrill Ave
Whittram Ave
Beech Ave
Beech Ave
Arrow Blvd
Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd Hemlock Ave
Randall Ave
Hibiscus Ave
Pine Ave
Redwood Ave
Elm Ave
Sequoia Ave
Live Oak Ave
Mallory Dr
Athol St
Iris Dr Iris Dr
Rosemary Dr
Hunter St
El Molino St
El Molino St
Sultana Ave
Carmel St
Carob Ave
Robinia St
Fontana Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Beech Ave
Sequoia Middle
School
10 Union Pacific
10 Beech Ave Beech Ave
Hemlock Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Elm Ave El
m Ave
Redwood Ave Red
wood Ave
Live Oak Ave Live Oak Ave
Washington Dr
Boyle Ave
Boyle Ave
Manila St
Aliso Dr
Slover Ave
Valley Blvd
Southwest
Industrial Park
Beech Ave
Hemlock Ave
Live Oak
Ave
Elm Ave El
m Ave
Village Dr
Coleen St
Canyon Crest Dr
Camellia Dr
L
oyola Ct
Redwood Ave
Jurupa Ave
Southridge
Plaza
Southridge Park
Southridge
Village
Weeping Willow Ln
15 15
Coyote Canyon Rd
Duncan Canyon Rd
Lytle Creek
Rd
Citrus
Ave
Agave Ave
Blue Iris St
Caterpillar Dr
Coyote Canyon
Park
Summit Ave Summit Ave
Summit Ave
Citrus Ave
Park House Dr Edward Ave
Casa Grande Ave
Cypress Ave
Pine Leaf Ave
3 Mile Rd
Parkside Way
Magnolia Way
Delamar Dr
Gardens St
Parry Peak Dr
Godinez Dr
Wibert Dr
Sierra Lakes
Golf Course
Fontana Park
Patricia Marrujo
Park
Summit High
School
Citrus Heights
North
Citrus Heights
South
210 210
Walnut St
Catawba Ave
Catawba Ave
Medinah St
Augusta
Dr
Citrus Ave
Los Cedros Ave
Cypress Ave
Knox Ave
Athena Dr
Maloof Ave
Allison Way
Oleander Ave
Plum St
Highland Ave Almeria St Jacaranda Ave
Curtis Ave
Tokay Ave
Walnut Ave Cooper Ave
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
Citrus Ave
S Highland Ave
AB Miller High
School
Sierra Lakes
Cypress Ave
Almeria Ave
Chase Rd
Lime Ave
Oleander Ave
Abigail Pl
Virginia Dr
Elsa Ct
Riley Dr
Celeste Ave
Harvey Dr
Concord Ave
San Jacinto Ave
Jackson Dr Ja ckson Dr
Montgomery Ave
Barbee St
Reed Dr
Date Ave
Toyon Ave
Paine St
Miller Ave
Citrus Ave Citrus Ave
Baseline Ave
Almeria Middle
School
66 66 Catawba Ave Tokay Ave
Ceres Ave
Ceres Ave
Poplar Ave
Date St Date St
Seville Ave
Lime Ave
Ivy Ave
Orange Way
Upland Ave
Valencia Ave
Citrus Ave
Merrill Ave
Almeria Ave
Fontana Ave
Foothill Blvd
Cypress Park
Catawba Ave
Dianthus Ave
Randall Ave
Poplar Ave
Date St
Hawthorne Ave
Mallory Dr
Mallory Dr
Athol St Athol St
Athol St
Pine Ave
Oleander Ave
Almeria Ave
Niagara Ave
Hunter St
Iris Dr
Iris Dr
Lime Ave
Li
me Ave
Briarwood Ave
Grevillea St
Citrus Ave
Fontana Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Cypress Ave
Fontana High
School
Truman Middle
School
Citrus
Elementary
10 Oleander Ave
Poplar Ave Poplar Ave
Catawba Ave Catawba Ave
Aliso Dr
Santa Ana Ave
Washington Dr
Boyle Ave
Boyle Ave
Rose Ave
Tyrol Dr
Citrus Ave Citrus Ave
Valley Blvd
Cypress Ave
Catawba Ave
Cypress Ave
Gala Ave Citrus
Ave
Windcrest Dr
Village Dr
Willow Dr
Oleander Ave
Jurupa Ave
Cypress Ave
Citrus Ave
Catawba Park
15 Lytle Creek
Rd
Sycamore Creek Dr
Bur Oak Rd
Sierra Ave
Nealeys Corner
15 W Terra Vista Dr
Mango Ave
Linde Vista Dr
Palmetto Ave
W Via Bello Dr Rima Dr
Yarrow Ln
Sierra Ave
N Riverside Ave
Clubhouse Dr
Colonial Dr
Wyndham Ln
Augusta
Dr
Escalon Dr
W Casa Grande Dr
Napa
Valley Rd
Three Mile Rd
W Sunrise Dr
Summit Ave Summit Ave
N Mango Ave
La Sierra Dr
Mango
A
ve
Almaden Dr
A
lder Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
210
Mango Ave
Kaiser Ave
Cambria Ave
Palmetto Ave
Sierra Ave
Walnut St
Augusta
Dr
N Tamarind Ave
W Walnut Ave
Cerritos St
Fern St Fern St
Sierra Ave
W Casmalia St
Ruble Middle
School
Walnut Village
Tamarind Ave
Elaine Dr
Pa ml etto Ave
Malaga St
Malaga St
Mango Ave
Ramona Ave
Ramona Ave
Reed St
Reed St
Juniper Ave
Paine St
Paine St
Fairview Rd
Kempster Ave
Blanchard
Ave
Micallef St
Fairfax St
Barbee St
Barbee St
Barbee St
Wabash Ave Wabash Ave
Miller Ave
Sierra Ave
Sierra Ave
Bill Martin Park
Metrolink
66 66
Tamarind Ave Tamarind Ave
Juniper Ave
Palmetto Ave
Pepper Ave
Sewell Ave
Ceres Ave
Ceres Ave
Owen St
Upland Ave
Bennett Ave
Nuevo
Ave
Kaiser Ave
Seville Ave
Seville Ave
Ivy Ave
Ivy Ave
Orchid Dr
Vine St
Spring St
Rosena Ave
Chantry Ave
Sierra Ave
Arrow Blvd
Foothill Blvd
Civic Center
Veterans' Park
Seville Park and
Amphitheater
Fontana Middle
School
Fontana
Metrolink Plaza
Central
Fontana
Fontana
Ta
marind Ave
Tamarind Ave
Pine Ave
Palmetto Ave
Marygold Ave
Randall AveMango Ave
Athol St
Athol St
Tullock St
Holly Dr
Hibiscus St
Olive St
Hawthorne Ave
Emerald
Ave
Pepper Ave
Tangelo Ave
Encina Ave
Mallory Dr
Acacia Ave
Manzanita Dr
Grevillea St
San Bernardino Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
Jack Bulik Park
Cypress
Elementary
School
Kaiser Hospital
10 Union Pacific
10 Tamarind Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Saffron St
Juniper Ave Juniper Ave
Production Ave
Bennett Dr
Boyle Ave
Valley Blvd
Slover Ave
Sierra Ave
Inland Empire
Center
Sycamore Hills
Elementary
Empire Center
Underwood Dr
Jurupa Ave
Juniper Ave
Volante
Dr
Tamarind Ave
Lacebark St
Eucalyptus St
Pear St
Sierra A
v
e
Jurupa Ave
Sierra
Ave
Obsidian
Rd
American Elm R
W
d
hite Ash Rd
Lapis
Ln
Quartzite Ln
Paakuma' Park
Lytle Creek Wash
Adler Ave
W Via Bello Dr
N Riverside Ave
Ethel Kucera
Middle School
W Casa Grande Dr
W Buena Vista Dr
N Linden Ave
Lowell St
Stonehurst Dr
W Coast Blvd
Summit Ave
N Maple
Ave
W Summit Ave
Maple Ave
W Via Bello Dr
Banyon Ave
N Riverside Ave
N Locust Ave
Fergusson Park
Wilmer A Carter
High School
210
210
Vineyard Ave
Alder
Ave
N Linden Ave
N Linden Ave
W Walnut Ave
Laurel Ave
Laurel Ave
W Bohnert Ave
Renaissance Pkwy
W Casmalia St
Locust Ave
Miro Way
Miro Way
Alder Ave
N Linden Ave
Laurel Ave
Spohn Ave
Willia
ms Rd Williams Rd
Fairfax St
Fairview Dr W Victoria St
Barbee St Barbee St
Grace Ave
N Maple Ave
Grove Pl
Laguna Pl
Montgomery Ave
Farney Ave
Dumond Dr
Ramona Ave
Maple Ave
Locust
Ave
Alder Ave
W Base Line Rd
Miller Ave
Alder Middle
School
Metrolink
Granada Ave Granada Ave Laurel Ave
Bonnie Ln
Citron Ave
Citron Ave
Spohn Dr
Upland Ave
Seville Ave
Dorsey Way
Ivy Ave
N Linden Ave
McCauley St
Maple Ave Maple Ave
Locust Ave
Merrill Ave
W Rialto Ave Alder Ave
Arrow Blvd
W Merrill Ave
Foothill Blvd W Foothill Blvd
Pine Ave
Evergreen Ln
Marygold Ave
Pinedale Ave
Randall Ave
Laurel Ave
Palm Ln
Hibiscus St
Athol St
Athol St
El Molino St
Filbert St
Linden Ave
Maple Ave
Alder Ave
Locust Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Union Pacific Rail road
10 Santa Ana Ave
Taylor Ave
Locust Ave
Linden Ave
Alder Ave
Mindanao St
Laurel Ave
Otilla St
Maple Ave
Ash St
Gregory St
Valley Blvd
Valley Blvd
Locust Ave
Slover Ave
Ayala Park
Walt
Zimmerman
School
Bloomington
High School
11th St
Alder Ave
10th St
Maple Ave
Birch St Birch St
9th St
Jurupa Ave
Jurupa Ave
7th St
Armstrong
Rd
Locust Ave
Kessler Park
Ruth O Harris
Middle School
Sandra Dr
Gail Dr
J C Rd
Armstrong
Rd
Verdemont Ranch Rd
Verdemont
Ranch
Rd
Glen Helen Regional P
Lytle Creek Wash
Institution Rd
N Riverside Ave
Sycamore Ave
N Orange Ave
N Cedar Ave
N Apple Ave
N
Apple Ave
N Palm Av
W Summit Ave e
N
Fillm ore Ave
Olive Ave
Ayala Dr
Trapp
Elementary
School
Sunrise
Christian
Elementary
School
W Casmalia St
N Arrowhead Ave
W La Gloria Dr
N Cedar Ave
W Bohnert Ave
Ayala Dr
W Casmalia St
Jerry Eaves
Park
Kolb Middle
School
N Fitzgerald Ave
W Rosewood St
N Beechwood Ave
W Grove St
N
Driftwood Ave
N Larch Ave
Mason St
N Brier
wood
Ave
N Cedar Ave
W Base Line Rd
W Etiwanda Ave
Ayala Dr
Renaissance
Center
Lorraine Pl
W 2nd St
S Larch Ave
N Larch Ave
S
Cedar
Ave S
Cedar Ave
W Rialto Ave
W Merrill Ave
N
Cedar Ave
W Foothill Blvd W Foothill Blvd
S Larch Ave
W Alru St
Orchard St
W Mallory Dr
Magnolia St
Magnolia St
W Hawthorne St
Vine St
W Gr anada St
Olive St Olive St
Pomona Ave
Larch Ave
Spruce Ave
Grove Pl
Grove Pl
W Randall Ave
Cedar
Ave
Bloomington Ave
S Cedar Ave
10 Larch Ave
Otilla St
Spruce Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Maple Ln
Orange St
Valencia St
Manila St
Gregory St
Cedar Ave
Cedar Ave
Valley Blvd
Bloomington
U
p
Railro
ad
Jurupa Ave
12th St 12th St
7th St
Appaloosa Ln
6th St
13th St
Pepper St
4th St
Pine St
14th St
8th St
Oak St
5th St
Touche Dr
Cedar Ave
7th St
Green Acres
Memorial Park
Crestmore
Elementary
School
El Rivino Rd
Castellano Rd
Rouner Dr
Crestmore
Heights
SCG Transmission Line
SCG Transmission Line
SCG Transmission Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
Victoria
Banana
San Sevaine 1
San Sevaine 3
San Sevaine 2
San Sevaine 5
Jurupa
Hickory
RP3-C1
Upper
Declez
(DZU)
Etiwanda
Conservation
RP3-C4 RP3-C3
Etiwanda
Debris
Basin
Rich
RP3-C2
Etiwanda
Conservation
San Sevaine 4
Merrill
Linden
36"
42"
60" 60"
48"
42"
6 6"
42"
48"
42"
60"
36"
72"
42"
36 "
36"
60"
36"
36"
7 8"
3 42"
6"
36"
42"
72"
36"
72"
36"
36"
36"
60"
66"
66"
48"
54"
42" 78"
42"
36"
8 4"
42"
48"
6 6"
48"
36"
36"
36"
54 "
42"
60"
54"
60"
36"
42"
42"
36"
36"
4 5 "
42"
36"
42"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
48 42"
78"
36"
66"
48 "
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
66"
72"
42"
42"
96"
66"
48"
48"
42"
42"
36"
36"
42"
42"
60"
36"
36"
66"
42"
48"
36"
36"
78"

6.5' x
2'
60"
42"
36"
57"
66"
60"
54"
36"
36"
42"
3 6
"
36"
36 "
36"
72"
54"
54"
66"
4 2"
54"
42"
36 "
36"
36"
54"
48"
66"
48"
54"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
42"
78"
36"
36"
42"
36"
60"
60"
91"
96"
36"
36"
36"
54"
48"
4 2"
48"
36"
36"
96"
48"
60"
48"
36"
36"
48 "
36"
60"
36"
4 2"
36"
48"
91"
36"
54"
54"
36"
36"
48 "
84"
42"
36"
48 "
36"
54"
54"
54"
2 x 18"
7 8"
42"
66"
36"
36"
36"
84"
36"
36"
42"
48"
42"
54"
78"
36"
42"
36"48"
36"
60"
60"
66"
2 x 30"
36"
36"
60"
60"
36"
78"
66"
36"
48"
72"
48"
54"
48 48"
60"
48"
36"
96"
54"
42"
66"
42"
42"
53"
60"
72"
36"
36"
72"
48"
36"
54"
60"
36"
36"
36"
84"
66"
66"
90"
42"
72"
78"
42"
54"
36"
66"
54"
66"
36"
48 "
36"
96"
60 "
66"
36"
B-6
C-6
A-3B
B-3
C-9
C-2
A-0D
B-7
B-2
B-5
B-1
A-0C
C-8A
HR-1
A-4
A-1A
A-0
B-8
C-5
A-1
C-8
A-2A
A-2
A-3A
C-7
C-4
A-0A
B-5A
A-0B
A-3C
C-0
C-8B
A-3
54"
42"
42"
36"
42" 36"
66"
36"
66"
36"
42"
36"
36"
72"
48"
54"
90"
72"
42"
42"
96"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
78"
36"
36"
36"
42"
48"
36"
9' x 12'
48"
42"
42"
54"
42"
54" 48"
60" 72"
96"
36"
60"
42"
42"
96"
48"
10' x 9'
48"
60"
84"
78"
72"
84"
72"
66"
90"
DZ-8
SS-10
SS-6
JH-1
SS-9A
SR-4
SR-1
SS-9
SS-7
JH-2
SS-5
SS-11
DZ-13
DZ-4
DZ-15A
SS-8
DZ-9
DZ-11B
DZ-12
DZ-7
DZ-14 DZ-11
DZ-16A
SR-3
DZ-14A DZ-12A
DZ-11A
DZ-10
DZ-16
SR-2
6' x 7'
36"
36"
36"
48"
84"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36" 48"
36"
48"
48" 36"
14' x 6'
66"
108"
48"
48"
36"
66"
60"
96"
48"
36"
42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
48"
84"
72"
84"
60"
60"
60"
42"
54"
48"
54"
54"
2, 66"
84"
60"
42"
42"
8' x 5'
66"
2, 66"
60"
84"
48"
66"
96"
42"
72"
42"
42"
60"
78"
60"
66"
84"
36"
66"
78"
3' x 4'
54"
7 2 "
14' x 9'
36"
5' x 10'
102"
48"
102"
48"
42"
42"
36"
39"
78"
48"
60"
36"
48"
36"
36"
60"
66"
36"
48"
48"
54"
72"
36"
90"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
36"
54"
36"
39"
36"
36"
48"
36"
72"
36"
54"
36"
36"
36"
48"
42"
48"
66"
60"
36"
42"
54"
66"
54"
36"
36"
48"
36"
29" x 45"
36"
48"
36"
14' x 9'
36"
39"
45"
48"
14' x 9'
72"
48"
36"
60"
45"
108"
54"
36"
48"
36"
54"
36 "
72"
66"
60"
7 2"
4 2"
60"
36"
72 "
60"
102"
54"
54"
60"
3 6"
45"
60"
39"
3 6"
54"
72 "
3 9"
54"
36"
78"
8' x
6'
78"
48"
72"
66"
5' x1
0'
36"
54"
48"
42"
45"
96"
54"
54"
42"
78"
4 2" 36"
36"
36"
14' x 9'
48"
66"
78"
48"
60"
45"
60"
42"
42"
48"
60"
48"
54"
84"
78"
78"
36"
72"
42"
42"
78"
42"
42"
63"
7' x
12 '
39"
2,
8' x
4'
45"
48"
66"
66"
48"
42"
48"
48"
8'
x
5'
60"
48"
42"
36"
42"
42"
6' x 10'
60"
75"
60"
36"
54"
66"
78"
42"
66"
36"
66"
42"
36"
51"
48"
48"
39"
42"
48"
36"
36"
42"
66"
66"
54"
66"
54"
60"
54"
78"
42"
54" 48"
39"
78" 78"
36"
45" 51"
60"
60"
108"
72 "
72"
14' x 9'
108" 48"
39"
90"
36"
42"
36"
36"
69"
48"
60"
66"
48 "
72"
42"
54"
54"
48"
42"
36"
42"
96"
54"
36"
42"
72"
54"
54"
66"
72"
72"
96"
90"
48"
36"
75"
90"
36"
42"
72"
96"
96"
90"
66" 60"
72"
54"
84"
96"
48"
72"
42"
66"
54"
48"
42"
54"
78"
36"
48" 30"
36"
42"
102"
72"
90"
42"
90"
68" x 43"
48"
36"
7 3
2"
6 "
48"
54"
60"
36"
2, 14' x 8'
54"
36"
81"
2, 10' x 8.5'
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
48"
7 8 "
42 "
72"
9' x 8'
3 6
"
48"
42"
54"
2, 12' x 9'
42"
66"
48"
2, 12' x 9'
42"
36"
57"
45"
36"
42"
36"
45"
42"
2, 12' x 6'
7 2
"
4' x 6'
48"
48"
4 8"
60"
36"
42"
72"
36"
36"
72"
42"
36"
54"
36"
12' x 6'
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
2, 8' x 8'
54"
36" 54"
66"
7 2"
36"
66"
2, 10' x 8.5'
36"
36"
57"
36"
2, 10' x 7'
54"
48"
39"
75"
42"
75"
48"
48"
96"
2, 10' x 8'
54"
38"
48"
2, 10' x 8'
96"
36"
6 6"
54"
36"
48"
42"
39"
42"
54"
42"
42 "
36"
48"
39"
42"
7 8"
3' x 3'
5 4"
54"
36"
72"
36"
36"
72"
2, 10' x 8'
42"
5 4 "
36"
78"
36"
42 "
42"
42"
54"
36"
42"
42"
66"
48"
72"
2, 10' x 8'
42"
36"
66"
72"
36"
36"
42"
54"
48"
51"
66"
42"
36"
48"
42"
57"
72"
36"
36"
42"
36"
54"
36"
36"
36"
8' x 8'
2, 10' x 8'
48"
36"
72"
36"
45"
48"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
42"
48"
42"
36"
22" x 36"
69"
42"
42"
39"
36"
66"
4 8"
36"
3 9 "
48"
57"
48"
42"
42"
36"
42"
54"
48"
60"
36"
42"
42"
36"
48"
48"
66"
48"
90"
48"
10' x 8'
81"
4, 12' x12'
72"
60"
54"
36"
36"
84"
48"
48 2, 10' x 8'
36"
42"
60"
48"
36"
96"
48"
36"
48"
36"
36"
42"
72"
36"
108"
36"
36"
66"
36"
36"
2, 12' x 8'
42"
36"
2, 10' x 8'
60"
36"
3 6"
42"
2, 12' x 8'
75"
36"
72"
60"
3 9"
42"
54 "
45"
36"
96"
2, 10' x 8'
48"
54"
36"
48"
2, 10' x 6'
9 0 "
45"
30"
36"
36"
36"
42"
48"
78"
36"
54"
42"
54"
60 "
48"
48"
60"
36"
36"
42"
42"
42"
72"
39" 36"
60"
51"
7' x 4'
42"
54"
54"
2, 10' x 8'
42"
45"
36"
48"
36"
60"
36"
36"
102"
39"
42"
2, 8' x 8'
36"
54"
48"
81"
72"
51"
45"
57"
36"
60"
72"
96"
36"
42"
78"
66"
45"
42"
5' x 12'
72"
51"
39"
48"
8' x 8'
42"
60"
36"
84"
36"
72"
96"
60"
54"
9' x 8'
78"
60"
51"
54"
1 08 "
42"
51"
39"
78"
51"
36"
48"
5' x 10'
78"
69"
51 "
60"
36"
51"
48"
72"
42"
36"
66"
2, 12' x 8' 2, 12' x 8'
36"
2, 10' x 8' 2, 10' x 8' 2, 9' x 8' 2, 9' x 8' 2, 8' x 8' 60"
M-5B-A
D-1A
WG-3
J-1A
E-7
E-6
H-0A
M-5-E
M-4
E-2
M-5D
E-1
T-6B
E-4 E-5
SS-1
M-2
M-1
J-4
M-5G-A
M-3
T-5C
WG-1
F-6
D-6C
SS-0
T-3A
T-7A
M-5E-A
F-1
F-3
M-5-A
F-2
G-6
G-4
G-2
E-3
M-5E-C M-5E-D M-5E-E M-5E-F
T-7B
M-5E-B
M-2A
M-0
T-0
F-4
J-1C J-3A
G-2A
M-5A
J-4A
SS-2C
SS-2B
J-4B
M-1A
G-4A
D-6
G-6A
T-2B
J-2A
T-1B
M-5B-C
M-3A
T-2C
M-5B-B
M-5G-C
M-5B-D
M-5G-B
D-7
T-7
G-1
T-2A
G-3
SS-2A-3
G-5
T-1A
T-6A
D-6B
F-1B
T-5B
J-1
F-5A
M-5H
WG-2
T-8A
M-5C
F-1A
T-9
T-8B
J-1B
SS-2A-2
M-6C
T-8C
SS-0A SS-0B
M-7C
T-8D
M-5B-E
G-7
T-11 T-10
M-7D
J-3
F-5
D-6A
M-5-B
M-5-C
M-7A
M-5G
M-6A
J-2
T-5 T-3
T-9A
M-6D M-5F-A
T-6
M-7E
T-8
T-5A
T-4
SS-2D
SS-2A-1
M-7B M-6B M-5F
H-0
M-5B
T-2
SS-2A
M-5-D
E-0
G-0
M-5E
60"
66"
60"
60"
6' x 4'
60"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
54"
48"
78"
78"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
36"
36"
54"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
72"
78"
36"
36"
36"
36"
66"
48"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
36"
48"
36"
36"
36"
66"
54"
48"
36"
36"
72"
54"
66"
36"
42"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
60"
66"
36"
48"
36"
42"
36"
42"
42"
54"
42"
36"
66"
42"
42"
60"
36"
36"
72"
60"
42"
72"
72"
48"
42"
54"
48"
42"
66"
60"
42"
36"
42"
42"
48"
42"
42"
54"
42"
48"
36"
54"
54"
42"
42"
48"
42"
60"
42"
36"
42"
54" 42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42" 54"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
54"
54"
42"
60"
42"
54"
48"
72"
42"
54"
96"
54"
48"
42"
36"
42"
42"
48"
48"
60"
48"
48"
48"
66"
42"
42"
48"
54"
42"
66"
48"
48"
42"
54"
42"
60"
36"
42"
42"
36"
54"
48"
42"
42" 42"
42"
60"
42"
42"
54"
42"
42"
54"
36"
72" 78"
42"
54"
36"
48"
42"
66"
42"
42"
54"
42"
54"
66"
48"
48"
72"
72"
48"
54"
48"
42"
66"
54"
60"
42"
48"
42"
48"
42"
42"
2, 14' x 6'
42"
66"
54"
48"
54"
78"
42"
42"
42"
48"
54"
54"
42"
42"
66"
66"
60"
42"
42"
42"
60"
42"
42"
66"
42"
54"
66"
66"
72"
72"
42"
36"
42"
54"
42"
54"
54"
48"
48"
10' x 10'
54"
42"
60"
72"
72"
48"
42"
48"
36"
42"
42"
48"
36"
48"
2, 14' x 6'
96"
14' x 8'
96"
54" 72"
10' x 8'
54"
60"
78"
78"
78"
78"
48"
54"
84"
54"
72"
66"
66"
66"
78"
72" 84"
60"
72"
72"
72"
42"
54"
48"
66"
84"
72"
96"
120"
102"
F-0
San Sevaine Channel
Etiwanda Creek Channel
Summit Avenue Storm Drain
Nealey'
s Corner
Drain
Etiwanda
Spreading Grounds
Lytle Creek Wash
Riverside Groin #2, COE
Mulberry Channel
Henderson Channel
Riverside Groin #5, COE
Riverside Groin #3, COE
Riverside Groin #4, COE
Sa
n
Sevaine
Spreadi
n
g
G
ro
u
n
d
s
East Fontana Storm Drain
Lower Etiwanda Creek Channel
Hawker-Crawford Channel
I-10 Channel
24th Street Storm Drain
Declez Channel
Highland Channel
West Fontana Channel
Cactus Channel
48 36
60 48
54 54
36 48
36 36
48 60
36 72
48 60
84 36
66 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Feet
Map Disclaimer:

The data provided hereon may be inaccurate or out of date and any person or entity who relies on said information for any purpose whatsoever does so solely at their own risk.

Neither the City of Fontana nor any agency, officer, or employee or either nor of any information provider warrants the accuracy, reliability of timeliness of any of the data provided hereon.

THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING BY WAY OF ILLUSTRATION AND NOT OF LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.

REFER TO CITY OF RIALTO

MASTER PLAN OF
DRAINAGE, AREA 3-3
AOS Boundary
Fontana Sphere of Influence
Existing Pipes (36-inch diameter and larger)
Regional Flood Control Channels
Metropolitan Water District Feeders
Gas Transmission Lines
Proposed Projects
100-Year
25-Year
Proposed Pipe Sizes (inches or feet)
Proposed Projects on Regional Facilities
Proposed Private Development Projects
Proposed Detention Basins
Existing Detention Basins
Existing Recharge Basins 36"
36"

REFER TO CITY OF RIALTO

MASTER PLAN OF
DRAINAGE, AREA 3-3
Legend
1862
Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Fontana, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, City of Fontana, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS, Esri, USGS Victoria St
Vintage Dr
Blue Gum Dr
Arapaho Rd
Park Ln
East Av
D
e
ay Creek Blvd
Etiwanda Ave
Etiwanda
15 W L bi erty
Pkwy
Miller Ave
Ilex St
Napa St
Cottonwood Ave
N Mainstreet
Pecan Ave
Arbor Ln
Garcia Dr
Whittram Ave
Arrow Rte
East Ave East Ave
Baseline Rd
Day Creek Blvd
Etiwanda Ave
Victoria Gardens Ln
Foothill Blvd
Foothill
Marketplace
Victoria
Gardens
East Etiwanda Creek
10 Shea Center Dr
Concours St
Kaiser Way
Access Rd
Barrington Ave
6th St
San Bernardino Ave
o Mills Pkwy
Valley Blvd
Slover Ave
N Etiwanda Ave
Airport Dr
4th St
Etiwanda Ave
15 Hemlock Ave
Walnut St
Victoria St
S Highland Ave
Cherry Ave
66 Sultana Ave
E Liberty
Pkwy
Hemlock Ave
Calabash Ave
Back Straight Rd
W L ni coln Loop Rd
E
Lincoln Loop Rd
W
Yosemite Loop
Rd
W
Grand Ave
Redwood Ave
Miller Ave
Hilton Dr
Elm
Ave
Live Oak Ave
Banana Ave
W Liberty Pkwy
Bar Harbor Rd
Almond Ave
W Perimeter Rd
Beech Ave
Beech Ave
Sultana Ave
Cherry Ave
Merrill Ave
Whittram Ave
Miller Ave
Baseline Ave
Arrow Rte Arrow Blvd
Foothill Blvd
McDermott Park
10 Hemlock Ave
Randall Ave
Almond Ave
Hibiscus Ave
Pine Ave
California Steel Way
Banana Ave
Elm
Ave
Marcona Ave
Calabash Ave
Live Oak Ave
S Perimeter Rd
Athol St
Rosemary Dr
Washington Dr
Boyle Ave
Fontana Ave
Slover Ave
Beech Ave
S San Bernardino Ave
an Bernardino Ave
Cherry Ave Cherry Ave
Valley Blvd
Auto Club
Speedway
210
Walnut St
Mango Ave
Palmetto Ave
Juniper Ave
Maloof Av
Oleander Ave
Almeria St
Walnut Ave
Cooper Av
Sierra Ave
Citrus Ave
S Highland Ave
S Highland Ave
W Casmalia St
Tamarind Ave
Cypress Ave
Oleander Ave
Juniper Ave Juniper Ave
Palmetto Ave
Ceres Ave
Ceres Ave
Lime Ave L mi e Ave
Owen St
Upland Ave Upland Ave
Reed St
Ivy Ave
Ivy Ave
Paine St
Almeria Ave
Miller Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
Sierra Ave
Citrus Ave
Arrow Blvd
Merrill Ave
Baseline Ave
Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd
Fontana
Tamarind Ave
Juniper Ave Juniper Ave
Catawba Ave
Pine Ave
Palmetto Ave
Oleander Ave Oleander Ave
Marygold Ave
Randall Ave Mango Ave
Poplar Ave
Athol St
Olive St
Date St
Washington Dr
Mallory Dr
Filbert St
Boyle Ave Boyle Ave Boyle Ave
Iris Dr
Lime Ave
Acacia Ave
Valley Blvd
Citrus A
ve
Fontana Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
Slover Ave
Palm Court
Shopping
Center
Inland Empire
Center
Cypress
Elementary
School
Kaiser Hospital
210
Alder Ave Alder Ave
N Linden Ave
Laurel Ave Laurel A
Ayala Dr
W Casmalia St
Renaissance Pkwy
Locust Ave
Miro Way
N Linden Ave
Laurel Ave
W 2n
S Linden Ave
Upland Ave
W Grove S
Grace Ave
Maple Ave Maple Ave
N
Cedar Ave
Locust Ave
Merrill Ave
Alder Ave
W Base Line Rd W Base Line Rd
W Etiwanda Av
S
Cedar Ave
W Rialto Ave
W Merrill Av
Arrow Blvd
Miller Ave
Foothill Blvd W Foothill Blv
10 Pine Ave
Taylor Ave
Evergreen Ln
Marygold Ave
Larch Ave
Pinedale Ave
Randall Ave
Laurel Ave
Palm Ln
Linden Ave Linden Ave
S Larch Ave
W A
Orange St
Grace Ave
Valley Blvd Valley Blvd
Locust Ave
Alder Ave
Bloomington
SCG Transmission Line
SCG Transmission Line
SCG Transmission Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
Victoria
Banana
San
Sevaine 5
Hickory
Etiwanda
Conservation
Etiwanda
Conservation
Merrill
Linden
42"
36"
66"
66 "
42"
36"
42"
36"
36"
66"
42"
96"
36"
4 8"
60"
66"
36"
36"
48"
66"
36"
36"
60"
36"
36"
60"
54"
42"
36"
66"
96"
42"
53"
36"
36 "
66"
72"
60"
66"
C-7 C-5
C-2
C-4
C-8B
C-8A C-8 C-0 60" 48"60" 66"
66"
42"
72"
72"
72"
54"
42"
72"
78"
SS-9A DZ-10 DZ-9 DZ-7
DZ-16A DZ-15A
DZ-12A
DZ-14A
DZ-11A
SS-5 DZ-11B
42"
36"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
60"
42"
36"
39"
42"
36"
3 9
4 "
2"
42"
42"
42"
60"
42"
48"
36"
7 2"
3 "
6 48"
72"
36"
2, 14' x 8'
54"
36"
81" 2, 10' x 8.5'
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
48"
78"
4 2
"
72"
9' x 8'
36"
4 8"
54"
2, 12' x 9'
42"
66"
48"
2, 12' x 9'
42"
36"
57"
45"
36"
42"
36"
45"
72"
48"
4' x 6'
48"
4 8"
60"
36"
42"
72"
36"
36"
42"
36"
54"
12' x 6'
42"
36"
36"
36"
36 "
2, 8' x 8'
54"
54"
66"
36"
72"
36"
66"
36 "
57"
2, 10' x 7'
48"
54"
48"
39"
75"
42"
42"
48"
75"
48"
54"
96"
2, 10' x 8'
66"
48"
2, 10' x 8'
96"
36"
54"
36"
48"
42"
39"
42"
42"
42 "
36"
39"
42"
78"
3' x 3'
54"
54"
36"
72"
36"
72"
2, 10' x 8'
42"
5 4 " 36"
78"
36"
4 2"
42"
42"
54"
36"
42"
42"
66"
72"
2, 10' x 8'
42"
36"
36"
66"
72"
36 "
42"
48"
42"
51"
66"
42"
48"
36"
42"
57"
72"
36"
54"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
8' x 8'
36"
36"
45"
48"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
48"
42"
36"
22" x 36"
69"
42"
39"
48"
36"
66"
36"
39 "
48"
57"
48"
42"
42"
36"
42"
54"
48"
60"
36"
42"
42"
36"
48"
48"
66"
48"
90"
48"
10' x 8'
81"
60"
4, 12' x12'
72"
54"
3 6"
36"
84"
48"
2, 10' x 8'
60"
42"
36"
96"
48"
36"
48"
48"
3 6"
36"
42"
72"
48" x 42"
108"
36"
36"
36"
66"
36"
36"
2, 12' x 8'
36"
42"
2, 10' x 8'
60"
36"
36"
42"
2, 12' x 8'
75"
36"
72"
60"
54"
3 9"
42"
45"
36"
96"
48"
54"
36"
48"
2, 10' x 6'
9 0"
45"
30"
36"
36"
36"
42"
48"
78"
36"
54"
42"
54"
60"
48"
48"
60"
36"
36"
42"
42"
42"
72"
60"
51"
54"
7' x 4'
42"
54"
42"
2, 10' x 8'
45"
36"
48"
60"
36"
36"
36"
102"
39"
42"
2, 8' x 8'
36"
54"
81"
72"
51"
45"
36"
57"
60"
72"
96"
36"
42"
78"
66"
45"
42"
5' x 12'
72"
51"
39"
48"
8' x 8' 36"
60"
42"
84"
36"
72"
96"
60"
54"
9' x 8'
78"
51"
54"
1 0 8"
42"
51"
39"
78"
51"
36"
48"
5' x 10'
78"
69"
51 "
60"
36"
51"
48"
72"
42"
36"
66"
2, 12' x 8' 2, 12' x 8'
36"
2, 10' x 8' 2, 10' x 8' 2, 9' x 8' 2, 9' x 8' 2, 8' x 8' 60" M-5B-A
D-1A
WG-3
J-1A
E-7 E-6
H-0A
M-5-E
M-4
E-2
M-5D
E-1
T-6B
E-4 E-5
SS-1
M-2
M-1
J-4
M-5G-A
M-3
WG-1
T-5C
F-6
D-6C
SS-0
T-3A
T-7A
M-5E-A
F-1
F-3
M-5-A
F-2
G-6 G-2 G-4
E-3
M-5E-C M-5E-D M-5E-E M-5E-F
T-7B
M-5E-B
M-2A
M-0
T-0
F-4
J-1C
J-3A
G-2A M-5A
J-4A
SS-2C
SS-2B
J-4B
M-1A
G-4A
D-6
G-6A
T-2B
J-2A
T-1B
M-5B-C
M-3A
T-2C
M-5B-B
M-5G-C
M-5B-D
M-5G-B
D-7
T-7
G-1
T-2A
G-3
SS-2A-3
G-5
T-1A
T-6A
D-6B
F-1B
T-5B
J-1
F-5A
M-5H
WG-2
T-8A
M-5C
F-1A
T-9
T-8B
J-1B
SS-2A-2
M-6C
T-8C
SS-0A SS-0B
M-7C
T-8D
M-5B-E
G-7
T-11 T-10
M-7D
J-3
F-5
D-6A
M-5-B
M-5-C
M-7A
M-5G
M-6A
J-2
T-5 T-3
T-9A
M-6D
M-5F-A
T-6
M-7E
T-8
T-5A
SS-2D
T-4
SS-2A-1
M-6B M-5F
M-7B
H-0
M-5B
T-2
SS-2A
M-5-D
E-0
G-0
M-5E
60"
66"
60"
60"
6' x 4'
60"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
54"
48"
78"
78"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
36"
36"
54"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
72"
78"
36"
36"
36"
36"
66"
48"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
36"
48"
36"
36"
66"
36"
54"
48"
36"
36"
72"
54"
66"
36"
36"
42"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
60"
66"
36"
48"
36"
42"
36"
42"
42"
54"
42"
36"
66"
42"
42"
60"
36"
36"
72"
60"
72"
42"
72"
48"
42"
54"
48"
42"
66"
60"
42"
36"
42"
42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
54"
48"
36"
54"
54"
42"
42"
48"
42"
60"
42"
36"
42"
54" 42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42" 54"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
54"
54"
42"
60"
54"
42"
48"
72"
42"
54"
96"
54"
48"
42"
36"
42"
42"
48"
48"
60"
48"
48"
48"
66"
42"
54"
48"
42"
42"
66"
48"
48"
42"
54"
42"
36"
60"
36"
42"
42"
54"
48"
42"
42" 42"
42"
60"
42"
42"
54"
42"
42"
54"
36"
72"
42"
78"
54"
36"
48"
42"
42"
66"
42"
54"
42"
54"
48"
66"
48"
72"
72"
48"
54"
48"
42"
66"
54"
60"
42"
48"
42"
48"
42"
42"
2, 14' x 6'
42"
66"
54"
48"
78"
54"
42"
42"
42"
48"
42"
54"
54"
42"
66"
66"
60"
42"
42"
42"
60"
42"
42"
66"
42"
54"
66"
66"
72"
72"
42"
36"
42"
54"
42"
54"
54"
48"
48"
10' x 10'
54"
42"
60"
72"
72"
48"
42"
48"
36"
42"
42"
48"
36"
48"
2, 14' x 6'
96"
14' x 8'
96"
54" 72"
10' x 8'
54"
60"
78"
78"
78"
78"
48"
54"
84"
54"
72"
66"
66"
66"
78"
72" 84"
60"
72"
72"
72"
42"
54"
48"
66"
84"
72"
96"
120"
102"
F-0
San Sevaine Channel
Etiwanda
Cre
e
k
C
h
a
n
n
el
Lowe
r
E
ti
wa
n
d
a
Cree
k
Ch
a
n
n
el
Mulberry Channel
East Fontana Storm Drain
I-10 Channel
Cactus Channel
Highland Channel
West Fontana Channel
Path: P:\F\FONT00000121\0600INFO\GS\Maps\ProposedCapitalImprovementProjects.aprx AOS Boundary
Fontana Sphere of Influence
Existing Pipes (36-inch diameter and larger)
Regional Flood Control Channels
Proposed Projects
100-Year
25-Year
Proposed Pipe Sizes (inches or feet)
Proposed Projects on Regional Facilities
Existing Detention Basins
Existing Recharge Basins
Metropolitan Water District Feeders
Gas Transmission Lines
AOS 1 Capital Projects
City of Fontana Storm Drain Master Plan
0 3,000 6,000 12,000 Feet
36"
36"
1863
Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Fontana, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS, City of Fontana, County of Riverside, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Esri, USGS East Etiwanda Creek
10 na St
Kaiser Way
Access Rd
Barrington Ave
6th St
San Bernardino Ave
Valley Blvd
Slover Ave
N Etiwanda Ave S Etiwanda Ave
Etiwanda Ave
60 Dahlia St
Industry Ave
Marlay Ave
e Dr
Inland Ave
C St
B St
Grapevine St
7th St
Dulles Dr
De Forest Cir
Jurupa Ave
Etiwanda Ave
S Etiwanda Ave
10 Hemlock Ave Hemlock Ave
Randall Ave
Almond Ave
Almond Ave
Business Dr
Beech Ave
Pine Ave
Santa Ana Ave Santa Ana Ave
Redwood Ave
California Steel Way
Banana Ave
Banana Ave
Elm
Ave Elm
Ave
Marcona Ave
Calabash Ave
Calabash Ave
Live Oak Ave
Live Oak Ave
S Perimeter Rd
Rosemary Dr
Washington Dr
Boyle Ave
Fontana Ave
Slover Ave
Beech Ave
S San Bernardino Ave
an Bernardino Ave
Cherry Ave Cherry Ave
Valley Blvd
Mulberry Ave
60 60
Beech Ave
Banana Ave
Marlay Ave
Elm
Ave
Canyon Crest
Dr
Cabernet Dr
Glenoak Pl
Ben Nevis Blvd
Campbell St
Granite Hill Dr
Philadelphia Ave
Jurupa Ave
Mulberry Ave
Country
Village Rd
Southridge Park
Campbell St
Hastings Blvd
10 Tamarind Ave Tamarind Ave
Juniper Ave Juniper Ave
Catawba Ave
Catawba Ave
Santa Ana Ave Santa Ana Ave
Palmetto Ave
Oleander Ave Oleander Ave
Marygold Ave
Randall Ave
Mango Ave
Poplar Ave Poplar Ave
Olive St
Date St
Washington Dr
Mallory Dr
Filbert St
Boyle Ave Boyle Ave Boyle Ave
Iris Dr
Lime Ave
Acacia Ave
Valley Blvd
Citrus A
ve
Fontana Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
Slover Ave
Palm Court
Shopping
Center
Inland Empire
Center
Cypress
Elementary
School
Kaiser Hospital
60 Jurupa Ave
Underwood Dr
Citrus Ave
Village Dr
Willow Dr
Karen
Ln
27th St
Scenic Dr
Pyrite
St
Jurupa Ave
Sierra
Ave
Armstrong
Rd

OAK QUARRY
Catawba Park
Jurupa
Mountains
Cultural Center
60 Granite Hill Dr
Florine
Ave
34th St
36th
St
10 Santa Ana Ave
Pine Ave
Taylor Ave
Evergreen Ln
Alder Ave
Marygold Ave
Pinedale Ave
Randall Ave
Laurel Ave Laurel Ave
Palm Ln
Linden Ave Linden Ave
Orange St
Maple Ave
Grace Ave
Valley Blvd Valley Blvd
Cedar Ave
Locust Ave
Locust Ave
Alder Ave
Slover Ave Bloomington
Jurupa
8th St
6th St
13th St
11th St
Alder Ave
9th St
14th St
10th St
Oak St
Karen Ln
20th St
20th S
Sierra Ave
Gail Dr
Loveland Dr
Rorimer Dr
Locust Ave
Cedar Ave
7th St
Armstrong
Rd
Crestmo
Height
Sierra Ave
SCG Transmission Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
Jurupa
RP3-C1
Upper
Declez
(DZU)
Etiwanda
Conservation
RP3-C4 RP3-C3
RP3-C2
Etiwanda
Conservation
DZ-8
SS-10
SS-6
JH-1
SS-9A
SR-4
SR-1
SS-9
SS-7
JH-2
SS-5
SS-11
DZ-13
DZ-4
DZ-15A
SS-8
DZ-9
DZ-11B
DZ-12
DZ-7
DZ-14 DZ-11
DZ-16A
SR-3
DZ-14A DZ-12A
DZ-11A
DZ-10
DZ-16
SR-2
36"
36"
36"
48"
84"
42"
36"
36"
36"
36" 48"
36"
48"
48" 36"
14' x 6'
66"
108"
48"
48"
36"
66"
60"
96"
48"
36"
42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
48"
84"
72"
84"
60"
60"
60"
42"
54"
48"
54"
54"
2, 66"
84"
60"
42"
42"
8' x 5'
66"
2, 66"
60"
84"
48"
66"
96"
42"
72"
42"
42"
60"
78"
60"
66"
84"
36"
66"
78"
3' x 4'
54"
7 2"
14' x 9'
36"
5' x 10'
102"
102 "
42" 36"
42"
36"
39"
78"
60"
48"
60"
48"
36"
36"
60"
36"
4 8"
48"
54"
90"
36"
36"
36"
48"
42"
36"
54"
36"
39"
36"
48"
72"
36"
54"
36"
36"
36"
72"
48"
42"
48"
66"
60"
36"
42"
54"
66"
36"
48"
36"
36"
48"
36"
14' x 9'
36"
39"
72"
45"
48"
48"
14' x 9'
36"
60"
45"
54"
108"
36"
48"
36"
54"
60"
36 "
72"
66"
60"
7 2"
42"
60"
36"
72"
60"
102"
54"
54"
24" x 36"
60"
36"
45"
60"
36"
39"
5 4 "
72"
39"
54"
36"
36"
78"
8 ' x
6'
78"
66"
48"
72"
5' x
1 0'
36"
54"
48 "
45"
96"
54"
42 "
4 2"
78"
36"
36"
36"
14' x 9'
48"
66"
78"
48"
60"
45"
42"
42"
60"
48"
48"
54"
84"
78"
78"
36"
72"
42"
42"
78"
42"
42"
63"
7' x
12 '
39"
2,
8' x
4'
45"
66"
66"
48"
42"
48"
48"
8 ' x
5'
60"
48"
42"
36"
42"
42"
6' x 10'
60"
75"
60"
3 6"
54"
78"
66"
4 2"
66"
36"
66"
42"
36"
51"
48"
48"
39"
42"
48 3
"
6 "
36"
42"
66"
66"
54"
66"
54"
60"
54"
78"
42"
54" 48"
39"
78"
36"
78" 45" 51"
60"
60"
108"
7 2
"
72"
14' x 9'
108" 48"
39"
90"
36"
42"
36"
69"
36"
48"
60"
66"
48"
72"
42"
54" 54"
48"
42"
36"
42"
96"
54"
36"
42"
72 "
54"
54"
66"
72"
72"
96"
90"
48"
36"
75"
90"
36"
42"
72"
96"
96"
90" 66" 60" 72" 54"
84"
96"
48"
72"
42"
66"
54"
48"
42"
60"
54"
7 8"
36"
48" 30"
36"
42"
102"
72"
90"
42"
90"
36"
54"
4' x 6'
12' x 6'
36"
48"
66"
38"
3' x 3'
36"
54"
42"
42"
51"
36" 54"
42"
84"
4 8
48" 48"
48" x 42"
66"
36" 42"
48"
48"
48"
60"
36"
36"
39"
78"
39" 36"
5' x 10'
M-5B-A
M-5B-C M-5B-D M-5B-E
G-1 G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7
M-5B-B
M-5C
J-1A
M-4
M-5D
M-5-D
SS-2A-2 SS-2A-3
M-2
M-1
J-4
M-5G-A
M-3
M-5E-A
M-5-A
M-5E-C M-5E-D M-5E-E M-5E-F M-5E-B
M-2A
M-0
M-5H J-1C J-3A J-4A
SS-2C
SS-2B
J-4B
M-1A
M-5F-A
J-2A
M-6D
M-5G-B M-5G-C M-3A
M-7E
J-1
J-1B
M-6C
M-6B M-5F
M-7C
M-7B
M-7D
J-3
M-5-B
M-5-C
M-7A
M-5G
M-6A
J-2
SS-2D
M-5B
SS-2A
G-0
M-5E
60"
6' x 4'
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
60"
36"
42"
66"
36"
66"
42"
36"
72"
66"
42"
36"
36"
48"
36"
36"
42"
36"
42"
42"
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
36"
36"
36"
54"
36"
36"
36"
48"
48"
42"
48"
36"
48"
36"
48"
48"
36"
36"
36" 42"
60"
60"
72"
42"
42"
42"
42"
48"
72"
42"
54"
48"
48"
54"
60"
42"
48"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
42"
96"
42"
66"
42"
42"
48"
54"
60"
54"
42"
42"
60"
54"
54"
72" 78"
54"
42"
66"
54" 66"
54" 66"
60"
42"
2, 14' x 6'
66"
54"
78"
42"
54"
54"
42"
42"
42"
66"
72"
42"
10' x 10'
60"
2, 14' x 6'
96"
14' x 8'
96"
78"
78"
78"
72" 66"
66"
78"
72" 84"
72"
72"
72"
42"
66"
72"
120"
Lower
E
tiwa
n
d
a
C
re
e
k
Ch
a
n
n
el
Mulberry Channel
E
tiwa
n
d
a
C
ree
k
Ch
a
n
nel
San Sevaine Channel
I-10 Channel
Declez Channel
36 36
36 60
36 72
84 36
66 Path: P:\F\FONT00000121\0600INFO\GS\Maps\ProposedCapitalImprovementProjects.aprx AOS Boundary
Fontana Sphere of Influence
Existing Pipes (36-inch diameter and larger)
Regional Flood Control Channels
Proposed Projects
100-Year
25-Year
Proposed Pipe Sizes (inches or feet)
Proposed Private Development Projects
Proposed Detention Basins
Existing Detention Basins
Existing Recharge Basins
Metropolitan Water District Feeders
Gas Transmission Lines
AOS 2 Capital Projects
City of Fontana Storm Drain Master Plan
0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet
36"
36"
1864
Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Fontana, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS, Esri, USGS Decliff Dr
East Etiwanda Creek
East Ave
Wilson Ave
Summit
Intermediate
tation No.
6 Copley Dr
Highland Ave
Fisher Dr
Silver Sky Rd
East Ave
Colonbero
Rd
Woodley Ridge Dr
Decliff Dr
Summit Ave
Regina Dr
East Etiwanda
Creek
Wardman Bullock Rd
Crescenta Way
San Sevaine
Rd
Rid
geline
Pl
Aggazzotti Rd
Frost Dr
Johnston Pl
Cherry A
ve
Wilson Ave
210
15 Copley Dr
Fisher Dr
Gypsum Dr
Highland Ave
Cherry Ave
Banyan St
Duncan Canyon Rd
Tahan Way
Brookside Ave
Coyote Canyon Rd
Foxborough Dr
Bridlepath Dr
Coyote Canyon
15 Lytle Creek Rd
Coyote Canyon
Rd
S Bridlepath Dr
Summit Ave
Fox Ridge Dr
Wrangler Dr
San Sevaine Rd
Tenderfoot Dr
Deer Dr
Hawk St
Roosevelt Dr
Reagan
Dr
Saddlepeak Dr
Beech Ave
Rosena Park
East
David W Long
Elementary
Summit Heights
Hunter's Ridge
San Sevaine Rd
Brant Dr
Curtis Ave
Larkstone St
Lytle Creek Rd
Rockwell Ave
Horizon St
Chantel Dr
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
S Highland Ave
15 15
Coyote Canyon Rd
Duncan Canyon Rd
Lytle
Creek
Rd
Citrus Ave
Agave Ave
Blue Iris St
Caterpillar Dr
Coyote Canyon
Park
Summit Ave Summit Ave Summit Ave
Citrus Ave
Park House Dr
Edward Ave
Casa Grande Ave
Cypress Ave
Pine Leaf Ave
3 Mile Rd
Parkside Way
Magnolia Way
Delamar Dr
Gardens St
Parry Peak Dr
Godinez
Dr
Wibert Dr
Sierra Lakes
Golf Course
Fontana Park
Patricia Marrujo
Park
Summit High
School
Citrus Heights
North
Citrus Heights
South
210
Medinah St
Augusta Dr
Citrus Ave
Knox Ave
Maloof Ave
Highland Ave
Curtis Ave
Tokay Ave
Cooper Ave
Sierra Lakes Pkwy
S Highland Ave
Sierra Lakes
15 Lytle Creek
Rd
Sycamore Creek Dr
Sierra
Ave
Nealeys Corner
15 W Terra Vista Dr
Mango Ave
Linde Vista Dr
Palmetto
Ave
W Via Bello Dr Rima Dr
Yarrow Ln
Sierra Ave
N Riverside Ave
Clubhouse Dr
Colonial Dr
Wyndham Ln
Augusta
Dr
Escalon Dr
W Casa Grande Dr
Napa Valley Rd
Three Mile Rd
W Sunrise Dr
Summit Ave Summit Ave
N Mango Ave
La Sierra Dr
Mango Ave
Almaden Dr
Alder Ave
Sierra Ave Sierra Ave
Kaiser Ave
Sierra Ave
Augusta Dr
Sierra Ave
W Casmalia St
American Elm R
W
d
hite Ash Rd
Lytle Creek Wash
Adler Ave
N Riverside Ave
Ethel Kucera
Middle School
W Casa Grand
W Buena Vista D
Lowell St
Stonehurst Dr
Summit Ave
Fergusson Park
210
Alder Ave
Laurel Ave
Ren
W
SCG Transmission Line
12 ft. MWD Line
12 ft. MWD Line
San Sevaine 1
San
Sevaine 3
San Sevaine 2
San Sevaine 5
Etiwanda
Debris
Basin
Rich
San Sevaine 4 36"
42"
60" 60"
48"
42"
6 6"
42"
48"
42"
60"
36"
72"
42"
36 "
36"
60"
36"
36"
7 8"
42"
3 6"
36"
42"
72"
36"
72"
36"
36"
36"
60"
66"
66"
48"
54"
42" 78"
42"
36"
8 4"
48"
6 6"
36"
48"
36"
36"
36"
54 "
42"
60"
54"
60"
36"
42"
36"
36"
4 5 "
42"
36"
42"
36"
42"
36"
36"
48 36"
48 "
42"
78"
36"
66"
36"
66"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
72"
42"
42"
96"
66"
48"
48"
42"
42"
36"
36"
36"
42"
42"
60"
36"
36"
36"
66"
42"
48"
36"
36"
78"

6.5' x 2'
60"
42"
36"
57"
66"
60"
54"
36"
36"
42"
3 6
"
36"
36 "
36"
72"
54"
54"
66"
4 2"
42"
3 6
"
36"
36"
54"
48"
66"
48"
54"
60"
36"
36"
36"
36"
36"
42"
42"
78"
36"
36"
42"
36"
60"
60"
91"
96"
36"
36"
36"
54"
48"
4 2"
36"
36"
96"
48"
60"
48"
36"
36"
48"
36"
42"
60"
36"
42 "
36"
48"
91 "
36"
54"
54"
36"
48 "
84"
42"
36"
48 "
36"
54"
54"
54"
2 x 18"
7 8"
42"
66"
36"
36"
36"
84"
36"
36"
42"
48"
42"
54"
78"
36"
42"
36"
48"
48"
36"
60"
60"
66"
2 x 30"
36"
36"
60"
60"
36"
78"
66"
3 "
6 48"
72"
48"
54"
48 48"
60"
48"
36"
96"
54"
42"
66"
42"
42"
53"
60"
72"
36"
36"
72"
48"
36"
54"
36"
36"
36"
84"
66"
66" 42"
90"
72"
78"
42"
54"
36"
66"
54"
66"
36"
48"
36"
96"
60"
66"
36"
B-6
C-6
A-3B
B-3
C-9
C-2
A-0D
B-7
B-2
B-5
B-1
A-0C
C-8A
HR-1
A-4
A-1A
A-0
B-8
C-5
A-1
C-8
A-2A
A-2
A-3A
C-7
C-4
A-0A
B-5A
A-0B
A-3C
C-0
C-8B
A-3
54"
42"
42"
36"
42" 36"
66"
36"
66"
36"
42"
36"
36"
72"
48"
54"
90"
72"
42"
42"
96"
36"
36"
36"
36"
48"
78"
36"
36"
36"
42"
48"
36"
9' x 12'
48"
42"
42"
54"
42"
54" 48"
60" 72"
96"
36"
60"
42"
42"
96"
48"
10' x 9'
48"
60"
84"
78"
72"
84"
72"
66"
90"
36"
42"
48"
36"
Lytle Creek Wash
E
tiwa
n
d
a
C
re
e
k
Cha
n
nel
Summit Avenue Storm Drain
Etiwanda Spreading
Grounds
Riverside Groin #2, COE
S
a
n
S
e
v
ain
e
Channel
Riverside Groin #4, COE
24th Street Storm Drain
Henderson Channel
Riverside Groin #3, COE
Sa
n
Se
v
a
ni e
Sp
rea
d
i
ng
G
ro
u
n
d
s
Cactus Channel
Hawker-Crawford
Channel
Highland Channel
48 60
48 54
54 36
48 48
48 60
Path: P:\F\FONT00000121\0600INFO\GS\Maps\ProposedCapitalImprovementProjects.aprx AOS 3 Capital Projects
City of Fontana Storm Drain Master Plan
AOS Boundary
Fontana Sphere of Influence
Existing Pipes (36-inch diameter and larger)
Regional Flood Control Channels
Proposed Projects
100-Year
25-Year
Proposed Pipe Sizes (inches or feet)
Proposed Private Development Projects
Proposed Detention Basins
Existing Detention Basins
Existing Recharge Basins
Metropolitan Water District Feeders
Gas Transmission Lines
0 2,000 4,000 8,000 Feet
36"
36"
1865
AOS 1 Capital Project Cost Estimates 1866
City of Fontana Storm Drain Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Project Cost Project Cost Project Cost Project Cost
D-1A $638,000.00 H-0 $16,558,000.00 M-5D $883,000.00 SS-2D $4,625,000.00 D-6 $20,519,000.00 H-0A $1,376,000.00 M-5E $27,493,000.00 T-0 $6,570,000.00 D-6A $4,675,000.00 J-1 $5,558,000.00 M-5E-A $1,543,000.00 T-10 $4,439,000.00 D-6B $3,028,000.00 J-1A $3,660,000.00 M-5E-B $1,985,000.00 T-11 $4,489,000.00 D-6C $1,459,000.00 J-1B $4,074,000.00 M-5E-C $1,960,000.00 T-1A $3,929,000.00 D-7 $3,131,000.00 J-1C $2,140,000.00 M-5E-D $1,931,000.00 T-1B $2,342,000.00 E-0 $27,459,000.00 J-2 $7,918,000.00 M-5E-E $1,936,000.00 T-2 $20,035,000.00 E-1 $10,120,000.00 J-2A $2,425,000.00 M-5E-F $1,914,000.00 T-2A $7,649,000.00 E-2 $6,511,000.00 J-3 $6,428,000.00 M-5F $8,724,000.00 T-2B $6,375,000.00 E-3 $6,394,000.00 J-3A $2,178,000.00 M-5F-A $5,968,000.00 T-2C $6,388,000.00 E-4 $6,764,000.00 J-4 $1,528,000.00 M-5G $7,041,000.00 T-3 $9,259,000.00 E-5 $6,409,000.00 J-4A $2,248,000.00 M-5G-A $1,450,000.00 T-3A $11,376,000.00 E-6 $6,249,000.00 J-4B $2,255,000.00 M-5G-B $2,428,000.00 T-4 $5,880,000.00 E-7 $6,321,000.00 M-0 $3,064,000.00 M-5G-C $2,473,000.00 T-5 $8,995,000.00 F-1 $2,821,000.00 M-1 $2,254,000.00 M-5H $11,553,000.00 T-5A $5,790,000.00 F-1A $4,093,000.00 M-1A $2,228,000.00 M-6A $8,300,000.00 T-5B $5,614,000.00 F-1B $2,986,000.00 M-2 $1,528,000.00 M-6B $8,904,000.00 T-5C $7,346,000.00 F-2 $4,982,000.00 M-2A $1,980,000.00 M-6C $4,254,000.00 T-6 $7,250,000.00 F-3 $4,898,000.00 M-3 $1,604,000.00 M-6D $6,021,000.00 T-6A $2,584,000.00 F-4 $2,134,000.00 M-3A $2,490,000.00 M-7A $10,749,000.00 T-6B $3,350,000.00 F-5 $5,824,000.00 M-4 $775,000.00 M-7B $9,501,000.00 T-7 $12,064,000.00 F-5A $3,272,000.00 M-5-A $42,209,000.00 M-7C $4,550,000.00 T-7A $1,434,000.00 F-6 $4,530,000.00 M-5-B $87,343,000.00 M-7D $4,736,000.00 T-7B $2,069,000.00 G-0 $31,966,000.00 M-5-C $11,275,000.00 M-7E $6,074,000.00 T-8 $10,190,000.00 G-1 $2,509,000.00 M-5-D $10,714,000.00 SS-0 $3,850,000.00 T-8A $3,685,000.00 G-2 $5,221,000.00 M-5-E $807,000.00 SS-0A $3,800,000.00 T-8B $3,920,000.00 G-2A $2,275,000.00 M-5A $2,295,000.00 SS-0B $4,371,000.00 T-8C $3,768,000.00 G-3 $2,518,000.00 M-5B $13,584,000.00 SS-1 $1,130,000.00 T-8D $5,920,000.00 G-4 $5,360,000.00 M-5B-A $377,000.00 SS-2A-1 $7,183,000.00 T-9 $4,593,000.00 G-4A $2,411,000.00 M-5B-B $2,380,000.00 SS-2A $28,483,000.00 T-9A $5,871,000.00 G-5 $2,514,000.00 M-5B-C $2,359,000.00 SS-2A-2 $4,513,000.00 WG-1 $1,625,000.00 G-6 $5,496,000.00 M-5B-D $2,398,000.00 SS-2A-3 $6,658,000.00 WG-2 $3,643,000.00 G-6A $2,435,000.00 M-5B-E $4,419,000.00 SS-2B $15,071,000.00 WG-3 $828,000.00 G-7 $5,223,000.00 M-5C $3,936,000.00 SS-2C $16,093,000.00 1867
City of Fontana Storm Drain Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-1A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 42" RCP FT 540 $588 $ 318,000
2 Manhole EA 1 $20,322 $ 20,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 3,180 $2.66 $ 8,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 3,180 $4 $ 13,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 3,180 $2 $ 6,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 18,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 4,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 39,000
$ 426,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 42,600
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 21,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 42,600
$ 106,000
$ 532,000
20% $ 106,000
$ 638,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
2 of 136 1868
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-6
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 10' x 8' RCB FT 1,990 $4,491 $ 8,937,000
2 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
3 Remove 14' x 8' RCB FT 850 $910 $ 773,000
4 Remove 12' x 8' RCB FT 1,990 $639 $ 1,272,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 19,900 $2.66 $ 53,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 19,900 $4 $ 80,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 19,900 $2 $ 40,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 563,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 118,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 1,194,000
$ 13,132,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 1,313,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 657,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 1,313,000
$ 3,283,000
$ 16,415,000
25% $ 4,104,000
$ 20,519,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
3 of 136 1869
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-6A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 1,320 $527 $ 696,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,700 $588 $ 1,000,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 680 $732 $ 498,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 21,740 $2.66 $ 58,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 21,740 $4 $ 87,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 21,740 $2 $ 43,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 128,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 27,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 272,000
$ 2,992,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 299,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 150,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 299,000
$ 748,000
$ 3,740,000
25% $ 935,000
$ 4,675,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway, 12' water main, and SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
4 of 136 1870
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-6B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 380 $527 $ 200,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 620 $588 $ 365,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 1,300 $656 $ 853,000
4 Manhole EA 6 $20,322 $ 122,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 14,020 $2.66 $ 37,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 14,020 $4 $ 56,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 14,020 $2 $ 28,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 83,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 17,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 176,000
$ 1,937,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 194,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 97,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 194,000
$ 485,000
$ 2,422,000
25% $ 606,000
$ 3,028,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Project Total
Item No. Item Description

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
5 of 136 1871
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-6C
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 1,290 $527 $ 680,000
2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 6,880 $2.66 $ 18,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 6,880 $4 $ 28,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 6,880 $2 $ 14,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 40,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 8,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 85,000
$ 934,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 93,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 47,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 93,000
$ 233,000
$ 1,167,000
25% $ 292,000
$ 1,459,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Project Total
Item No. Item Description

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
6 of 136 1872
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name D-7
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 48" RCP FT 450 $656 $ 295,000
2 Install 54" RCP FT 670 $732 $ 490,000
3 Install 60" RCP FT 950 $816 $ 775,000
4 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 14,680 $2.66 $ 39,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 14,680 $4 $ 59,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 14,680 $2 $ 29,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 89,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 19,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 190,000
$ 2,087,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 209,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 104,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 209,000
$ 522,000
$ 2,609,000
20% $ 522,000
$ 3,131,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
7 of 136 1873
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-0
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 102" RCP FT 7,920 $1,753 $ 13,884,000
2 Manhole EA 20 $20,322 $ 406,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 89,430 $2.66 $ 238,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 89,430 $4 $ 358,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 89,430 $2 $ 179,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 753,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 158,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 1,598,000
$ 17,574,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 1,757,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 879,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 1,757,000
$ 4,393,000
$ 21,967,000
25% $ 5,492,000
$ 27,459,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
8 of 136 1874
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-1
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 790 $527 $ 416,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,170 $588 $ 688,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 2,650 $656 $ 1,738,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 2,650 $732 $ 1,940,000
5 Manhole EA 18 $20,322 $ 366,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 46,540 $2.66 $ 124,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 46,540 $4 $ 186,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 46,540 $2 $ 93,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 278,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 58,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 589,000
$ 6,476,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 648,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 324,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 648,000
$ 1,620,000
$ 8,096,000
25% $ 2,024,000
$ 10,120,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
9 of 136 1875
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-2
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 690 $527 $ 364,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,150 $588 $ 676,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 520 $656 $ 341,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 1,340 $732 $ 981,000
5 Install 66" RCP FT 800 $911 $ 729,000
6 Manhole EA 11 $20,322 $ 224,000
7 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 29,540 $2.66 $ 79,000 8 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 29,540 $4 $ 118,000
9 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 29,540 $2 $ 59,000 10 Traffic Control % 5% $ 179,000
11 Erosion Control % 1% $ 38,000
12 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 379,000
$ 4,167,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 417,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 208,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 417,000
$ 1,042,000
$ 5,209,000
25% $ 1,302,000
$ 6,511,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
10 of 136 1876
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-3
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 890 $527 $ 469,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,150 $588 $ 676,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 1,000 $656 $ 656,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 1,650 $732 $ 1,208,000
5 Manhole EA 12 $20,322 $ 244,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 29,410 $2.66 $ 78,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 29,410 $4 $ 118,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 29,410 $2 $ 59,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 175,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 37,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 372,000
$ 4,092,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 409,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 205,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 409,000
$ 1,023,000
$ 5,115,000
25% $ 1,279,000
$ 6,394,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
11 of 136 1877
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-4
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 650 $527 $ 343,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,140 $588 $ 670,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,690 $732 $ 1,237,000
4 Install 72" RCP FT 960 $1,016 $ 975,000
5 Manhole EA 11 $20,322 $ 224,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 30,170 $2.66 $ 80,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 30,170 $4 $ 121,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 30,170 $2 $ 60,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 186,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 39,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 394,000
$ 4,329,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 433,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 216,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 433,000
$ 1,082,000
$ 5,411,000
25% $ 1,353,000
$ 6,764,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
12 of 136 1878
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-5
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 480 $527 $ 253,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,140 $588 $ 670,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,650 $732 $ 1,208,000
4 Install 66" RCP FT 1,000 $911 $ 911,000
5 Manhole EA 11 $20,322 $ 224,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 28,790 $2.66 $ 77,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 28,790 $4 $ 115,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 28,790 $2 $ 58,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 176,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 37,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 373,000
$ 4,102,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 410,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 205,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 410,000
$ 1,025,000
$ 5,127,000
25% $ 1,282,000
$ 6,409,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
13 of 136 1879
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-6
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 320 $527 $ 169,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,180 $588 $ 694,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,970 $732 $ 1,442,000
4 Install 72" RCP FT 680 $1,016 $ 691,000
5 Manhole EA 10 $20,322 $ 203,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 26,450 $2.66 $ 70,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 26,450 $4 $ 106,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 26,450 $2 $ 53,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 171,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 36,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 364,000
$ 3,999,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 400,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 200,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 400,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 4,999,000
25% $ 1,250,000
$ 6,249,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
14 of 136 1880
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name E-7
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 560 $527 $ 295,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,070 $588 $ 629,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,990 $732 $ 1,457,000
4 Install 66" RCP FT 670 $911 $ 610,000
5 Manhole EA 11 $20,322 $ 224,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 29,240 $2.66 $ 78,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 29,240 $4 $ 117,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 29,240 $2 $ 58,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 173,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 36,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 368,000
$ 4,045,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 405,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 202,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 405,000
$ 1,012,000
$ 5,057,000
25% $ 1,264,000
$ 6,321,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
15 of 136 1881
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-1
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 72" RCP FT 1,340 $1,016 $ 1,361,000
2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Remove 48" RCP FT 530 $71 $ 38,000
4 Remove 54" RCP FT 650 $80 $ 52,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,510 $2.66 $ 31,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,510 $4 $ 46,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,510 $2 $ 23,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 81,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 17,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 171,000
$ 1,881,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 188,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 94,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 188,000
$ 470,000
$ 2,351,000
20% $ 470,000
$ 2,821,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
16 of 136 1882
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-1A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 730 $527 $ 385,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 690 $588 $ 406,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 650 $656 $ 426,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 1,000 $732 $ 732,000
5 Manhole EA 8 $20,322 $ 163,000
6 Remove 42" RCP FT 980 $62 $ 61,000
7 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 19,210 $2.66 $ 51,000 8 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 19,210 $4 $ 77,000
9 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 19,210 $2 $ 38,000 10 Traffic Control % 5% $ 117,000
11 Erosion Control % 1% $ 25,000
12 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 248,000
$ 2,729,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 273,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 136,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 273,000
$ 682,000
$ 3,411,000
20% $ 682,000
$ 4,093,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
17 of 136 1883
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-1B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 710 $527 $ 374,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 690 $588 $ 406,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 970 $656 $ 636,000
4 Manhole EA 6 $20,322 $ 122,000
5 Remove 24" RCP FT 200 $35 $ 7,000
6 Remove 30" RCP FT 920 $44 $ 40,000
7 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 14,070 $2.66 $ 37,000 8 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 14,070 $4 $ 56,000
9 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 14,070 $2 $ 28,000 10 Traffic Control % 5% $ 85,000
11 Erosion Control % 1% $ 18,000
12 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 181,000
$ 1,990,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 199,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 100,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 199,000
$ 498,000
$ 2,488,000
20% $ 498,000
$ 2,986,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
18 of 136 1884
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-2
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 820 $527 $ 432,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 650 $588 $ 382,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 660 $656 $ 433,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 1,110 $732 $ 813,000
5 Install 60" RCP FT 280 $816 $ 228,000
6 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
7 Remove 36" RCP FT 720 $53 $ 38,000
8 Remove 39" RCP FT 850 $58 $ 49,000
9 Remove 42" RCP FT 320 $62 $ 20,000
10 Remove 48" RCP FT 1,080 $71 $ 77,000
11 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 22,260 $2.66 $ 59,000 12 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 22,260 $4 $ 89,000
13 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 22,260 $2 $ 45,000 14 Traffic Control % 5% $ 142,000
15 Erosion Control % 1% $ 30,000
16 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 302,000
$ 3,322,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 332,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 166,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 332,000
$ 830,000
$ 4,152,000
20% $ 830,000
$ 4,982,000
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

SUBTOTAL COST

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)
19 of 136 1885
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-3
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 850 $527 $ 448,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 640 $588 $ 376,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 670 $656 $ 440,000
4 Install 54" RCP FT 530 $732 $ 388,000
5 Install 66" RCP FT 840 $911 $ 765,000
6 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
7 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,040 $2.66 $ 61,000 8 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,040 $4 $ 92,000
9 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,040 $2 $ 46,000 10 Traffic Control % 5% $ 140,000
11 Erosion Control % 1% $ 29,000
12 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 297,000
$ 3,265,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 327,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 163,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 327,000
$ 817,000
$ 4,082,000
20% $ 816,000
$ 4,898,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
20 of 136 1886
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-4
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 480 $527 $ 253,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,320 $2.66 $ 27,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,320 $4 $ 41,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,320 $2 $ 21,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 61,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 129,000
$ 1,423,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 142,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 71,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 142,000
$ 355,000
$ 1,778,000
20% $ 356,000
$ 2,134,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
21 of 136 1887
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-5
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 890 $527 $ 469,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 710 $588 $ 417,000
3 Install 72" RCP FT 1,970 $1,016 $ 2,002,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Remove 39" RCP FT 590 $58 $ 34,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 25,830 $2.66 $ 69,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 25,830 $4 $ 103,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 25,830 $2 $ 52,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 166,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 35,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 353,000
$ 3,883,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 388,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 194,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 388,000
$ 970,000
$ 4,853,000
20% $ 971,000
$ 5,824,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
22 of 136 1888
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-5A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 830 $527 $ 437,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 610 $588 $ 359,000
3 Install 42" RCP FT 1,330 $588 $ 782,000
4 Manhole EA 7 $20,322 $ 142,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 17,270 $2.66 $ 46,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 17,270 $4 $ 69,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 17,270 $2 $ 35,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 94,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 20,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 198,000
$ 2,182,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 218,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 109,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 218,000
$ 545,000
$ 2,727,000
20% $ 545,000
$ 3,272,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
23 of 136 1889
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name F-6
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 630 $527 $ 332,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,650 $588 $ 970,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,250 $732 $ 915,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 21,760 $2.66 $ 58,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 21,760 $4 $ 87,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 21,760 $2 $ 44,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 129,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 27,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 275,000
$ 3,020,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 302,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 151,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 302,000
$ 755,000
$ 3,775,000
20% $ 755,000
$ 4,530,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
24 of 136 1890
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-0
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 54" RCP FT 1,320 $732 $ 966,000
2 Install 120" RCP FT 6,610 $2,433 $ 16,082,000
3 Manhole EA 20 $20,322 $ 406,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 94,020 $2.66 $ 250,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 94,020 $4 $ 376,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 94,020 $2 $ 188,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 913,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 192,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 1,937,000
$ 21,310,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 2,131,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 1,066,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 2,131,000
$ 5,328,000
$ 26,638,000
20% $ 5,328,000
$ 31,966,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
25 of 136 1891
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-1
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 650 $527 $ 343,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,500 $588 $ 882,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 12,280 $2.66 $ 33,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 12,280 $4 $ 49,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 12,280 $2 $ 25,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 72,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 15,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 152,000
$ 1,673,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 167,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 84,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 167,000
$ 418,000
$ 2,091,000
20% $ 418,000
$ 2,509,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
26 of 136 1892
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-2
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 550 $527 $ 290,000
2 Install 54" RCP FT 1,170 $732 $ 856,000
3 Install 66" RCP FT 1,490 $911 $ 1,357,000
4 Manhole EA 8 $20,322 $ 163,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,060 $2.66 $ 61,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,060 $4 $ 92,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,060 $2 $ 46,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 143,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 30,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 304,000
$ 3,342,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 334,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 167,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 334,000
$ 835,000
$ 4,177,000
25% $ 1,044,000
$ 5,221,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
27 of 136 1893
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-2A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 530 $527 $ 279,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,590 $2.66 $ 28,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,590 $4 $ 42,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,590 $2 $ 21,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 62,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 132,000
$ 1,455,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 146,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 73,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 146,000
$ 365,000
$ 1,820,000
25% $ 455,000
$ 2,275,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
28 of 136 1894
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-3
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 670 $527 $ 353,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,490 $588 $ 876,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 12,330 $2.66 $ 33,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 12,330 $4 $ 49,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 12,330 $2 $ 25,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 72,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 15,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 153,000
$ 1,678,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 168,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 84,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 168,000
$ 420,000
$ 2,098,000
20% $ 420,000
$ 2,518,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
29 of 136 1895
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-4
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 690 $527 $ 364,000
2 Install 54" RCP FT 1,210 $732 $ 886,000
3 Install 66" RCP FT 1,450 $911 $ 1,321,000
4 Manhole EA 8 $20,322 $ 163,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,760 $2.66 $ 63,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,760 $4 $ 95,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,760 $2 $ 48,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 147,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 31,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 312,000
$ 3,430,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 343,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 172,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 343,000
$ 858,000
$ 4,288,000
25% $ 1,072,000
$ 5,360,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
30 of 136 1896
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-4A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 660 $527 $ 348,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,280 $2.66 $ 30,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,280 $4 $ 45,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,280 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 66,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 140,000
$ 1,544,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 154,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 77,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 154,000
$ 385,000
$ 1,929,000
25% $ 482,000
$ 2,411,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
31 of 136 1897
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-5
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 710 $527 $ 374,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,450 $588 $ 853,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 12,310 $2.66 $ 33,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 12,310 $4 $ 49,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 12,310 $2 $ 25,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 72,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 15,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 152,000
$ 1,675,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 168,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 84,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 168,000
$ 420,000
$ 2,095,000
20% $ 419,000
$ 2,514,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
32 of 136 1898
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-6
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 810 $527 $ 427,000
2 Install 54" RCP FT 1,220 $732 $ 893,000
3 Install 66" RCP FT 1,440 $911 $ 1,312,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,050 $2.66 $ 61,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,050 $4 $ 92,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,050 $2 $ 46,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 151,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 32,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 320,000
$ 3,517,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 352,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 176,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 352,000
$ 880,000
$ 4,397,000
25% $ 1,099,000
$ 5,496,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
33 of 136 1899
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-6A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 680 $527 $ 358,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,390 $2.66 $ 30,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,390 $4 $ 46,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,390 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 67,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 142,000
$ 1,558,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 156,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 78,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 156,000
$ 390,000
$ 1,948,000
25% $ 487,000
$ 2,435,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
34 of 136 1900
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name G-7
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 780 $527 $ 411,000
2 Install 54" RCP FT 1,200 $732 $ 878,000
3 Install 60" RCP FT 1,460 $816 $ 1,191,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,460 $2.66 $ 62,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,460 $4 $ 94,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,460 $2 $ 47,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 143,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 30,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 304,000
$ 3,343,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 334,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 167,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 334,000
$ 835,000
$ 4,178,000
25% $ 1,045,000
$ 5,223,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
35 of 136 1901
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name H-0
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 72" RCP FT 1,330 $1,016 $ 1,351,000
2 Install 78" RCP FT 1,330 $1,133 $ 1,507,000
3 Install 84" RCP FT 3,900 $1,264 $ 4,930,000
4 Manhole EA 16 $20,322 $ 325,000
5 Remove 42" RCP FT 420 $62 $ 26,000
6 Remove 66" RCP FT 730 $99 $ 72,000
7 Remove 72" RCP FT 3,170 $108 $ 342,000
8 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 61,260 $2.66 $ 163,000 9 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 61,260 $4 $ 245,000
10 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 61,260 $2 $ 123,000 11 Traffic Control % 5% $ 454,000
12 Erosion Control % 1% $ 95,000
13 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 963,000
$ 10,596,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 1,060,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 530,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 1,060,000
$ 2,650,000
$ 13,246,000
25% $ 3,312,000
$ 16,558,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
36 of 136 1902
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name H-0A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 66" RCP FT 690 $911 $ 629,000
2 Manhole EA 2 $20,322 $ 41,000
3 Remove 36" RCP FT 690 $53 $ 37,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 5,550 $2.66 $ 15,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 5,550 $4 $ 22,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 5,550 $2 $ 11,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 38,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 8,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 80,000
$ 881,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 88,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 44,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 88,000
$ 220,000
$ 1,101,000
25% $ 275,000
$ 1,376,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
37 of 136 1903
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-1
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 78" RCP FT 2,520 $1,133 $ 2,855,000
2 Manhole EA 6 $20,322 $ 122,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 23,000 $2.66 $ 61,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 23,000 $4 $ 92,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 23,000 $2 $ 46,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 159,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 33,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 337,000
$ 3,705,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 371,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 185,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 371,000
$ 927,000
$ 4,632,000
20% $ 926,000
$ 5,558,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
38 of 136 1904
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-1A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 660 $527 $ 348,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 2,330 $588 $ 1,370,000
3 Manhole EA 7 $20,322 $ 142,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 17,210 $2.66 $ 46,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 17,210 $4 $ 69,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 17,210 $2 $ 34,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 100,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 21,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 213,000
$ 2,343,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 234,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 117,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 234,000
$ 585,000
$ 2,928,000
25% $ 732,000
$ 3,660,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
39 of 136 1905
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-1B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 800 $527 $ 422,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,020 $588 $ 600,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 1,330 $732 $ 974,000
4 Manhole EA 8 $20,322 $ 163,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 19,520 $2.66 $ 52,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 19,520 $4 $ 78,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 19,520 $2 $ 39,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 116,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 24,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 247,000
$ 2,715,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 272,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 136,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 272,000
$ 680,000
$ 3,395,000
20% $ 679,000
$ 4,074,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
40 of 136 1906
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-1C
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 660 $527 $ 348,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,160 $588 $ 682,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,340 $2.66 $ 28,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,340 $4 $ 41,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,340 $2 $ 21,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 61,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 130,000
$ 1,426,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 143,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 71,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 143,000
$ 357,000
$ 1,783,000
20% $ 357,000
$ 2,140,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
41 of 136 1907
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-2
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 66" RCP FT 3,570 $911 $ 3,252,000
2 Install 72" RCP FT 560 $1,016 $ 569,000
3 Manhole EA 10 $20,322 $ 203,000
4 Remove 24" RCP FT 400 $35 $ 14,000
5 Remove 30" RCP FT 340 $44 $ 15,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 33,520 $2.66 $ 89,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 33,520 $4 $ 134,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 33,520 $2 $ 67,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 217,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 46,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 461,000
$ 5,067,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 507,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 253,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 507,000
$ 1,267,000
$ 6,334,000
25% $ 1,584,000
$ 7,918,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
42 of 136 1908
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-2A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 650 $527 $ 343,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,150 $588 $ 676,000
3 Install 60" RCP FT 200 $816 $ 163,000
4 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,730 $2.66 $ 31,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,730 $4 $ 47,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,730 $2 $ 23,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 69,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 15,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 147,000
$ 1,616,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 162,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 81,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 162,000
$ 405,000
$ 2,021,000
20% $ 404,000
$ 2,425,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
43 of 136 1909
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-3
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 54" RCP FT 1,320 $732 $ 966,000
2 Install 66" RCP FT 1,310 $911 $ 1,193,000
3 Install 72" RCP FT 930 $1,016 $ 945,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 27,670 $2.66 $ 74,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 27,670 $4 $ 111,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 27,670 $2 $ 55,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 176,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 37,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 374,000
$ 4,114,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 411,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 206,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 411,000
$ 1,028,000
$ 5,142,000
25% $ 1,286,000
$ 6,428,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
44 of 136 1910
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-3A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 490 $527 $ 258,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,350 $588 $ 794,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,550 $2.66 $ 28,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,550 $4 $ 42,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,550 $2 $ 21,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 62,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 132,000
$ 1,452,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 145,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 73,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 145,000
$ 363,000
$ 1,815,000
20% $ 363,000
$ 2,178,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
45 of 136 1911
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-4
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 48" RCP FT 1,140 $656 $ 748,000
2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 7,320 $2.66 $ 19,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 7,320 $4 $ 29,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 7,320 $2 $ 15,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 44,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 9,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 93,000
$ 1,018,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 102,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 51,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 102,000
$ 255,000
$ 1,273,000
20% $ 255,000
$ 1,528,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
46 of 136 1912
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-4A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 580 $527 $ 306,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,330 $588 $ 782,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,910 $2.66 $ 29,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,910 $4 $ 44,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,910 $2 $ 22,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 64,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 136,000
$ 1,498,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 150,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 75,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 150,000
$ 375,000
$ 1,873,000
20% $ 375,000
$ 2,248,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
47 of 136 1913
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name J-4B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 600 $527 $ 316,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,960 $2.66 $ 29,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,960 $4 $ 44,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,960 $2 $ 22,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 64,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 137,000
$ 1,504,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 150,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 75,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 150,000
$ 375,000
$ 1,879,000
20% $ 376,000
$ 2,255,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
48 of 136 1914
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-0
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 60" RCP FT 1,700 $816 $ 1,387,000
2 Manhole EA 4 $20,322 $ 81,000
3 Remove 42" RCP FT 910 $62 $ 56,000
4 Remove 48" RCP FT 650 $71 $ 46,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 12,750 $2.66 $ 34,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 12,750 $4 $ 51,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 12,750 $2 $ 26,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 84,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 18,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 178,000
$ 1,961,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 196,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 98,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 196,000
$ 490,000
$ 2,451,000
25% $ 613,000
$ 3,064,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
49 of 136 1915
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-1
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 60" RCP FT 870 $816 $ 710,000
2 Install 6' x 4' RCB FT 250 $1,323 $ 331,000
3 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
4 Remove 48" RCP FT 840 $71 $ 60,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 8,680 $2.66 $ 23,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 8,680 $4 $ 35,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 8,680 $2 $ 17,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 62,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 131,000
$ 1,443,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 144,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 72,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 144,000
$ 360,000
$ 1,803,000
25% $ 451,000
$ 2,254,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
50 of 136 1916
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-1A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 660 $527 $ 348,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,240 $588 $ 729,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,810 $2.66 $ 29,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,810 $4 $ 43,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,810 $2 $ 22,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 64,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 135,000
$ 1,485,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 149,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 74,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 149,000
$ 372,000
$ 1,857,000
20% $ 371,000
$ 2,228,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
51 of 136 1917
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-2
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 48" RCP FT 1,090 $656 $ 715,000
2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 7,000 $2.66 $ 19,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 7,000 $4 $ 28,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 7,000 $2 $ 14,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 42,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 9,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 89,000
$ 977,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 98,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 49,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 98,000
$ 245,000
$ 1,222,000
25% $ 306,000
$ 1,528,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
52 of 136 1918
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-2A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 550 $527 $ 290,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,150 $588 $ 676,000
3 Manhole EA 4 $20,322 $ 81,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 9,690 $2.66 $ 26,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 9,690 $4 $ 39,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 9,690 $2 $ 19,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 57,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 12,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 120,000
$ 1,320,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 132,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 66,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 132,000
$ 330,000
$ 1,650,000
20% $ 330,000
$ 1,980,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
53 of 136 1919
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-3
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 48" RCP FT 1,150 $656 $ 754,000
2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 7,380 $2.66 $ 20,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 7,380 $4 $ 30,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 7,380 $2 $ 15,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 44,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 9,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 93,000
$ 1,026,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 103,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 51,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 103,000
$ 257,000
$ 1,283,000
25% $ 321,000
$ 1,604,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
54 of 136 1920
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-3A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 580 $527 $ 306,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,460 $588 $ 858,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,680 $2.66 $ 31,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,680 $4 $ 47,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,680 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 68,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 145,000
$ 1,594,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 159,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 80,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 159,000
$ 398,000
$ 1,992,000
25% $ 498,000
$ 2,490,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
55 of 136 1921
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-4
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 700 $527 $ 369,000
2 Manhole EA 2 $20,322 $ 41,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 3,740 $2.66 $ 10,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 3,740 $4 $ 15,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 3,740 $2 $ 7,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 22,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 5,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 47,000
$ 516,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 51,600
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 26,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 52,000
$ 129,600
$ 645,600
20% $ 129,000
$ 774,600
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
56 of 136 1922
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5-A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install Double 14' x 6' RCB FT 1,360 $16,722 $ 22,742,000 2 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 40,800 $2.66 $ 109,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 40,800 $4 $ 163,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 40,800 $2 $ 82,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 1,158,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 243,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 2,456,000
$ 27,014,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 2,701,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 1,351,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 2,701,000
$ 6,753,000
$ 33,767,000
25% $ 8,442,000
$ 42,209,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
57 of 136 1923
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5-B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 14' x 8' RCB FT 1,880 $8,361 $ 15,719,000
2 Install Double 14' x 6' RCB FT 1,870 $16,722 $ 31,270,000 3 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 86,180 $2.66 $ 229,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 86,180 $4 $ 345,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 86,180 $2 $ 172,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 2,396,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 503,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 5,082,000
$ 55,899,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 5,590,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 2,795,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 5,590,000
$ 13,975,000
$ 69,874,000
25% $ 17,469,000
$ 87,343,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to 12' water main conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
58 of 136 1924
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5-C
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 96" RCP FT 3,760 $1,572 $ 5,911,000
2 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 40,270 $2.66 $ 107,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 40,270 $4 $ 161,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 40,270 $2 $ 81,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 322,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 68,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 683,000
$ 7,516,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 752,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 376,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 752,000
$ 1,880,000
$ 9,396,000
20% $ 1,879,000
$ 11,275,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
59 of 136 1925
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5-D
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 670 $527 $ 353,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,310 $588 $ 770,000
3 Install 54" RCP FT 3,180 $732 $ 2,328,000
4 Install 60" RCP FT 2,010 $816 $ 1,640,000
5 Manhole EA 18 $20,322 $ 366,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 48,560 $2.66 $ 129,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 48,560 $4 $ 194,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 48,560 $2 $ 97,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 294,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 62,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 623,000
$ 6,856,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 686,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 343,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 686,000
$ 1,715,000
$ 8,571,000
25% $ 2,143,000
$ 10,714,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
60 of 136 1926
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5-E
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 700 $527 $ 369,000
2 Manhole EA 2 $20,322 $ 41,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 3,740 $2.66 $ 10,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 3,740 $4 $ 15,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 3,740 $2 $ 7,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 22,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 5,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 47,000
$ 516,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 51,600
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 26,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 52,000
$ 129,600
$ 645,600
25% $ 161,000
$ 806,600
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
61 of 136 1927
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 460 $527 $ 242,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,400 $588 $ 823,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 10,680 $2.66 $ 28,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 10,680 $4 $ 43,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 10,680 $2 $ 21,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 63,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 13,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 134,000
$ 1,469,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 147,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 73,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 147,000
$ 367,000
$ 1,836,000
25% $ 459,000
$ 2,295,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
62 of 136 1928
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 66" RCP FT 1,330 $911 $ 1,212,000
2 Install 72" RCP FT 4,130 $1,016 $ 4,196,000
3 Install 78" RCP FT 1,330 $1,133 $ 1,507,000
4 Manhole EA 17 $20,322 $ 345,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 58,000 $2.66 $ 154,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 58,000 $4 $ 232,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 58,000 $2 $ 116,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 388,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 82,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 823,000
$ 9,055,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 906,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 453,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 906,000
$ 2,265,000
$ 11,320,000
20% $ 2,264,000
$ 13,584,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
63 of 136 1929
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B-A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 340 $527 $ 179,000
2 Manhole EA 1 $20,322 $ 20,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 1,820 $2.66 $ 5,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 1,820 $4 $ 7,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 1,820 $2 $ 4,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 11,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 2,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 23,000
$ 251,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 25,100
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 13,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 25,000
$ 63,100
$ 314,100
20% $ 63,000
$ 377,100
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
64 of 136 1930
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B-B
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 690 $527 $ 364,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,350 $588 $ 794,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,620 $2.66 $ 31,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,620 $4 $ 46,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,620 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 68,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 144,000
$ 1,586,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 159,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 79,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 159,000
$ 397,000
$ 1,983,000
20% $ 397,000
$ 2,380,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
65 of 136 1931
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B-C
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 670 $527 $ 353,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,350 $588 $ 794,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,510 $2.66 $ 31,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,510 $4 $ 46,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,510 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 67,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 143,000
$ 1,573,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 157,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 79,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 157,000
$ 393,000
$ 1,966,000
20% $ 393,000
$ 2,359,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

Item No. Item Description
Project Total

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
66 of 136 1932
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B-D 100
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 730 $527 $ 385,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,330 $588 $ 782,000
3 Manhole EA 5 $20,322 $ 102,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 11,710 $2.66 $ 31,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 11,710 $4 $ 47,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 11,710 $2 $ 23,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 69,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 14,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 145,000
$ 1,598,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 160,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 80,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 160,000
$ 400,000
$ 1,998,000
20% $ 400,000
$ 2,398,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
67 of 136 1933
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5B-E
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 790 $527 $ 416,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 1,330 $656 $ 872,000
4 Manhole EA 9 $20,322 $ 183,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 20,510 $2.66 $ 55,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 20,510 $4 $ 82,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 20,510 $2 $ 41,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 121,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 25,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 257,000
$ 2,828,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 283,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 141,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 283,000
$ 707,000
$ 3,535,000
25% $ 884,000
$ 4,419,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to major highway and SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
68 of 136 1934
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5C
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 350 $527 $ 184,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 1,320 $588 $ 776,000
3 Install 48" RCP FT 1,340 $656 $ 879,000
4 Manhole EA 8 $20,322 $ 163,000
5 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 18,220 $2.66 $ 48,000 6 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 18,220 $4 $ 73,000
7 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 18,220 $2 $ 36,000 8 Traffic Control % 5% $ 108,000
9 Erosion Control % 1% $ 23,000
10 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 229,000
$ 2,519,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 252,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 126,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 252,000
$ 630,000
$ 3,149,000
25% $ 787,000
$ 3,936,000
+ Contingency increased to 25% due to SCG transmisson line conflict * All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY +

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
69 of 136 1935
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5D
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 810 $527 $ 427,000
2 Manhole EA 2 $20,322 $ 41,000
3 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 4,320 $2.66 $ 11,000 4 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 4,320 $4 $ 17,000
5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 4,320 $2 $ 9,000 6 Traffic Control % 5% $ 25,000
7 Erosion Control % 1% $ 5,000
8 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 54,000
$ 589,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 58,900
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 29,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 59,000
$ 146,900
$ 735,900
20% $ 147,000
$ 882,900
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
70 of 136 1936
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5E
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 60" RCP FT 1,320 $816 $ 1,077,000
2 Install 66" RCP FT 1,330 $911 $ 1,212,000
3 Install 72" RCP FT 5,480 $1,016 $ 5,568,000
4 Install 78" RCP FT 5,480 $1,133 $ 6,209,000
5 Manhole EA 34 $20,322 $ 691,000
6 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 110,270 $2.66 $ 293,000 7 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 110,270 $4 $ 441,000
8 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 110,270 $2 $ 221,000 9 Traffic Control % 5% $ 786,000
10 Erosion Control % 1% $ 165,000
11 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 1,666,000
$ 18,329,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 1,833,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 916,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 1,833,000
$ 4,582,000
$ 22,911,000
20% $ 4,582,000
$ 27,493,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION)

SUBTOTAL (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION)

SUBTOTAL COST
71 of 136 1937
City of Fontana Master Plan
FONT-0121
CIP Cost Estimates
AOS 1
Name M-5E-A
Units Quantities Unit Price * Item Total
1 Install 36" RCP FT 520 $527 $ 274,000
2 Install 42" RCP FT 820 $588 $ 482,000
3 Manhole EA 3 $20,322 $ 61,000
4 Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement SF 7,600 $2.66 $ 20,000 5 Crushed Miscellaneous Base SF 7,600 $4 $ 30,000
6 Replace Asphalt Concrete Pavement SF 7,600 $2 $ 15,000 7 Traffic Control % 5% $ 44,000
8 Erosion Control % 1% $ 9,000
9 Moblilization/Demobilization % 10% $ 94,000
$ 1,029,000
Engineering and Design % 10% $ 103,000
Surveying & Staking & Geotechnical % 5% $ 51,000
Construction Management/Staff % 10% $ 103,000
$ 257,000
$ 1,286,000
20% $ 257,000
$ 1,543,000
* All unit prices reflect 2024 costs.

CONTINGENCY

TOTAL PROJECT
Item No. Item Description
Project Total

Fontana City CouncilJuly 14, 2026

Fontana City Council
July 14, 2026