.
Parks and Recreation Department
650 Shell Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404
SUBJECT: Request for Proposal: CIP 301-682 FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN (FNA PARKS
SYSTEM MASTER PLAN) CONSULTANT
All those interested and qualified are invited to submit a proposal to develop a comprehensive Plan that re-envisions the City’s Parks System, as outlined in the scope of work that is outlined and delineated on the enclosed Request for Proposal (RFP).
PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: FRIDAY, February 2, 2024, at 2:00 PM RETURN PROPOSAL TO:
City of Foster City
Parks and Recreation Department
Attn: Derek Schweigart, Director
650 Shell Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404
The City will evaluate qualifications and references and may conduct interviews with the proposers to provide an opportunity for proposers to demonstrate their qualifications for the services.
Schedule
Release date: January 4, 2024
Deadline for Questions January 26, 2024
Proposals due: February 2, 2024
Interviews: February 19-22, 2024
Final deliberations: March 4-8, 2024
Submit to City Council for Approval: April 1, 2024
The City reserves the right to make changes to any of the foregoing dates in the Schedule or any other dates identified in the Request for Proposal, as may be necessary.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
129
Request for Proposal
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
CIP 301-682 FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT
PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: FRIDAY, February 2, 2024, at 2:00 PM RETURN PROPOSAL TO:
City of Foster City
Parks and Recreation Department
Attn: Derek Schweigart, Director
650 Shell Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
130
Request for Proposal
INDEX
SECTION
I. INTRODUCTION
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
V. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
VI. DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT
AND PROJECT CONTROLS
VII. STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHMENTS
A. DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES
B. STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AND SAMPLE INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS
C. COVID-19 AMENDMENT/ATTACHMENT
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
131
Request for Proposal
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR
CIP 301-682 FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT
SECTION I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Foster City (CITY) is seeking a qualified consulting firm to provide professional design services for CIP 301-682 Foster City Parks Master Plan. To that end, the CITY invites qualified consulting firms to submit proposals.
Consultants shall examine all information in this Request for Proposal (RFP), including the attachments.
The deadline for submitting questions about the proposal is Friday, January 26, 2024, at 5:00 pm.
The CITY will consider proposals received on or before the proposal submittal deadline of Friday, February 2, 2024, at 2:00 pm.
SECTION II. GENERAL INFORMATION
The City is seeking an experienced consulting firm to submit proposals to develop a comprehensive Plan that re-envisions the City’s Parks System. Consultant shall provide a proposal for professional design services for Foster City Parks Master Plan as described in Attachment A: Draft Scope of Services, Part II Description of Required Services.
Staff anticipates recommending approval for the award of the agreement for professional design services for CIP 301-682 Foster City Parks Master Plan at a City Council meeting in April 2024.
Consultant shall bear all costs and assume all liability associated with developing and/or submitting proposals. CITY shall bear no costs and/or assume no liability for developing and/or submitting proposals.
Consultants should be aware that any proposal submitted may be subject to a request for records and produced to a member of the public, if requested, in accordance with the California Public Records Act.
SECTION III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
To demonstrate the qualifications and experience necessary to perform the professional design services for the project, as described in Attachment A, Draft Scope of Services, Consultant shall submit a proposal that includes the information described in this section.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
132
Request for Proposal
If Consultants have questions regarding the proposal, submit questions to Derek Schweigart, Director of Parks and Recreation at [email protected] on or before Friday, January 26, 2024, at 5:00 pm.
The proposal shall be comprised of:
•Part 1 is comprised of electronic copy of document containing sections A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H described below.
•Part 2 is comprised of hard copy of document containing section J, Consultant Fee Schedule and Reimbursable Expenses.
The proposal should be concise and address qualifications and experience. Consultant shall not include superfluous information or analytical work that would otherwise be performed during the course of work in the proposal. The body of the proposal, excluding appendices, should not exceed 15 pages. As an appendix, provide resumes for the proposed team members. Proposals should be bound with tabs identifying each section herein specified.
PART 1
A. Cover Letter
Consultant shall provide a cover letter. The person who signs the cover letter shall be authorized to contractually bind the Consultant. The cover letter shall include the following:
1) A statement that all the information in the Request for Proposal was examined. 2) A statement that the proposal is binding for a 90-calendar day period. 3) The name, title, address, email, and telephone number of the individual to whom correspondence and other communications should be directed during the consultant selection process.
4) The name, title, address, email, and telephone number of the individual who will negotiate the consulting agreement with CITY, if selected, and is authorized to contractually bind the firm.
B. Executive Summary
Consultant shall provide an executive summary. The executive summary shall include a statement that Consultant reviewed the Draft Scope of Services and is able to provide the required professional services. The summary shall briefly summarize those Consultant qualifications and experience, contained in the proposal, which best highlights its ability to successfully deliver the work.
C. Project Approach
A summary presentation of the proposed approach for performing the services, describing how the firm would be organized and an approach structured to ensure:
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
133
Request for Proposal
1) Clearly specifying the scope of work; not to exceed amount; and schedule for the work that will be included in the contract for professional engineering services. 2) Monitoring and controlling the scope of work, communicating potential scope of work changes prior to performing that work, and managing the change in scope of work. 3) Monitoring the schedule and ensuring deliverables are completed on or before schedule milestones.
4) Monitoring the progress of the work to ensure that each submittal is complete and has been adequately reviewed prior to submitting deliverables. 5) Monitoring the quality of consultant’s deliverables to reduce the amount of City resources required to review the submittal.
6) Responsiveness to CITY Staff.
7) Facilitating communications.
8) No substituting of staff listed in the proposal and adding staff not listed in the proposal.
D. Proposal Schedule
The purpose of the proposal schedule is to ensure Consultant completes work in a timely manner and to ensure that labor projections are consistent with the proposal schedule.
Consultant shall prepare a schedule for the work described in Attachment A, Draft Scope of Services and shall show the key activities, their start dates, and end dates. The schedule should include a milestone for each Authorization to Proceed and each submittal identified in Attachment A, Draft Scope of Service. The durations required to reach milestones shown in the schedule will be incorporated into Tasks 1 and 2 of Scope of Services for the Professional Services Agreement.
The proposal schedule shall have sufficient details to achieve the above goals. CITY will request additional details from the highest ranked consultant which will be incorporated into the Professional Services Agreement.
Consultant shall use May 1, 2024, as the start date for the schedule.
E. Labor Projections
Consultant shall provide a schedule of hourly rates and an estimate of the number of hours by staff type to complete the work described in Attachment A, Draft Scope of Service that is consistent with the schedule created as part of Section D above. Provide descriptions of assumptions made in developing the labor hours.
F. Consultant Information
Consultant shall provide the following information for it and each of its sub- consultants, if any:
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
134
Request for Proposal
1) Legal name of firm.
2) Type of organization (partnership, corporation, etc.) and where incorporated, if applicable.
3) Firm’s Officers.
4) Date firm was established.
5) Address of firm’s headquarters.
6) Current number of people employed by the firm.
7) Name of consultant’s parent company, if any.
8) Name of consultant’s subsidiaries wholly owned or fractionally owned, if any. 9) List of companies associated with the consultant whose work on the project may potentially give rise to a conflict of interest, if any. 10) List of contracts terminated for convenience or default within the past three (3) years, if any. Include contract value, description of work, client's name and telephone number.
G. Consultant Experience and References
Consultant shall provide for it and each of its sub-consultants, if any, details of its experience working on similar projects over the last five (5) years.
Consultant shall provide for it and each of its sub-consultants, if any, details of not less than three (3) similar projects and the details shall include the following:
1) Project name.
2) Project Owner and contact information.
3) Project description including total project cost and location. 4) Description of the consultant’s role (Prime Consultant or sub-consultant to Prime Consultant’s Name).
5) Project Manager and other key personnel involved.
6) Sub-consultants on the proposed team that worked on the project, if any. 7) Contact information for the project owner.
If Consultant has a standard resume for projects, Consultant may provide the standard resumes with supplemental project information on a separate sheet. Providing supplemental project information on a separate sheet will have no effect on the evaluation process.
CITY will contact Project Owners to discuss the Consultant’s current and/or past performance.
For Project Owners’ contact information, provide Project Owner’s name and address, the name of a contact with knowledge of Consultant’s performance, as well as contact’s phone number and email.
H. Project Team Experience and References
The consulting team is key to delivering a successful project.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
135
Request for Proposal
For purposes of the proposal and the selection process, the following terms are used to identify consulting team members: Project Manager, Other Key Personnel, and Other Team Members. The Project Manager is responsible for Consultant’s work and is CITY’s principal contact after the professional services contract is awarded, (2) Other Key Personnel are the keys to Consultant successfully executing the work; and (3) Other Team Members who will play a significant role in successfully executing the work.
Consultant shall provide the following information regarding the consulting team and its team members:
1) Consultant shall provide an organization chart showing the proposed relationships and the various roles and/or disciplines required to deliver the work. Within the organization chart, Consultant shall identify the project manager, other key personnel, and other team members. If a team member works for a sub-consultant, identify the sub- consultant. Consultant shall identify at least one person for each role and/or discipline. 2) Provide a list of office(s) in which the proposed team members will work. Provide its address, its general phone number, and the name of the principal(s) overseeing proposed staff at the office. Identify the proposed team members working at the office and their roles.
3)Project Manager. Provide the qualifications and experience of the Project Manager, his/her current commitments to other projects to confirm Consultant's ability to commit resources to the work, and not less than three (3) references for the Project Manager. 4)Other Key Personnel. Provide the qualifications and experience of the Other Key Personnel; their current commitments to other projects to confirm Consultant's ability to commit resources to the work; and not less than three (3) reference for each person who is identified as Other Key Personnel.
5)Other Team Members. Provide the qualifications and experience of the Other Team Members.
CITY will contact project owners who have worked with the project manager and other key personnel to discuss their current and/or past performance. For each reference, list the proposed team member, project name, project owner, project owner’s address, the name of contact with knowledge of performance, contact’s phone number, and contact’s email address. Provide references from different owners, if possible.
SECTION IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Consultant shall submit its proposal in accordance with the following requirements:
A. CITY will only consider proposals received by City at or before the proposal submittal deadline of Friday, February 2, 2024, at 2:00 pm.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
136
Request for Proposal
B. Consultant shall submit proposals to the following address:
City of Foster City
Parks and Recreation Department
Attn: Derek Schweigart, Director
650 Shell Blvd.
Foster City, CA 94404
C. For e-mailed proposals, CITY encourages each Consultant to confirm that its proposal was received by CITY at or before the proposal submittal deadline. Contact the Parks and Recreation Department Director, Derek Schweigart at [email protected] to confirm City’s receipt of the proposal.
D. For hand-delivered proposals, Consultant shall deliver the proposal to the reception desk in the building lobby. Consultant shall ensure the proposal is time and date stamped by the attendant prior to leaving the building.
SECTION V. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
CITY will review proposals and perform reference checks to evaluate consultants.
CITY may or may not conduct consultant interviews to evaluate Consultants. If CITY chooses to hold interviews as part of the selection process, CITY will notify Consultants approximately three (3) weeks after the proposal submittal deadline.
Principle criteria used to evaluate Consultants will include the following:
1) Experience/Qualifications: Firm’s experience on similar projects in the last five years. a. Consultant’s and sub-consultant’s, if any, experience successfully providing professional services on similar projects in the last five (5) years. 2) Personnel Assigned: Experience of key personnel assigned to the project, and experience of key team members who will be assigned to the project for its full duration. a. Project Manager’s experience successfully providing professional consultant services and/or other related work on similar projects and their availability to perform work required by his/her role.
b. Other Key Personnel’s experience successfully providing professional services and/or other related work on similar projects and their availability to perform the work required by his/her role.
c. Other Team Members’ experience providing professional services and/or other related work on similar projects.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
137
Request for Proposal
3) Quality and Completeness of Proposal:
a. Clarity and relevance of information contained in the proposal. b. Consultant’s understanding of work.
c. Consultant’s approach to the work.
4) References
CITY may waive irregularities in any proposal, accept or reject all or any part of any proposal, or waive any requirements of the request for proposals, as may be deemed to be in the best interest of CITY. The CITY may also at any time during the review process decide not to proceed with the project.
After final evaluation, CITY will identify the highest ranked consultant, which appears to best meet the qualification criteria. CITY will attempt to negotiate a contract with the selected consultant prior to final approval of the contract by the CITY Council. If the highest ranked consultant and CITY cannot reach agreement, CITY will terminate negotiations and, at its option, negotiate with the next ranked consultant.
Consultants shall bear all costs and assume all liability associated with negotiating a consultant agreement. CITY shall bear no costs and/or assume no liability for negotiating a consultant agreement.
SECTION VI. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Scope of Services:
A general Draft Scope of Services is given in Attachment A. A more detailed Scope of Services will be developed during negotiations. The Draft Scope of Services is intended to cover the basic services necessary and/or other related work for proposal for professional consulting services for the Foster City Parks Master Plan project (CIP 301-682) identified herein and shall be used as the basis of negotiations. In addition, Consultant shall agree to perform the management and project controls specified in the Draft Scope of Services.
Consultant is encouraged to include in the proposal any additional tasks beyond the Draft Scope of Services that the Consultant may find necessary or beneficial in order to deliver a successful project.
CITY reserves the right to enter into agreements for none, a portion, modified portions, or all of the work listed in this Request for Proposal. CITY reserves the right to issue notice(s) to proceed for some or all the work up to 90 days after the CITY Council approves the agreement.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
138
Request for Proposal
SECTION VII. STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AND INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS
The standard professional services agreement is attached as Attachment B.
The insurance requirements are described in Section 12 Insurance of CITY’s Standard Professional Services Agreement. All policies, endorsements, certificates, and/or binders shall be subject to approval by CITY as to form and content. The selected consultant shall agree to provide CITY with a copy of said policies, certificates, and/or endorsements.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
139
Request for Proposal
ATTACHMENT A – Scope of Services
RFP #
Foster City Parks Master Plan CIP 301-682
Scope of Services to be Completed by Consultant for the Parks Master Plan I. Project Overview
The City of Foster City (City) was incorporated in 1971 and encompasses approximately (4) four-square miles and is located approximately 25 miles south of San Francisco and 30 miles north of Silicon Valley with easy access from HWY 101 and HWY 92. It is a culturally diverse community of roughly 32,000 residents. Unique to Foster City is the beauty and access to water, both the San Francisco Bay and its manmade lagoon system.
The City’s Parks System consists of 24 parks, eight miles of levee pedway (Bay Trail); 68 medians, 49 cul-de-sacs, 14 easements containing ice plants, sound walls, walkways, and bridges (hereto referred to as Parks System). There are 16 playgrounds, and 9 park sites with at least one court sport activity, 9 synthetic turf sports fields, and 14 park restrooms.
The City has maintained and made continuous improvements to the existing parks infrastructure, ensuring that components meet legal and City standards on a regular basis.
Even so, some of the City’s parks are over 50 years old, requiring attention to the aging infrastructure as well as ensuring that the Parks System remains relevant and continues to meet user needs now and in the future.
The Master Plan (Plan) is a planning and visioning tool that will guide City decision-makers in the planning, development and/or rehabilitation, maintenance, and funding of Foster City’s parks for the next 20-30 years. Foster City’s existing parks infrastructure needs rehabilitation or redesign to better meet current and future recreational needs of its residents and visitors.
The selected firm shall have experience and knowledge in park and recreation planning, master plan preparation, project management, and effective public involvement processes. The consultant will work closely with City staff in preparing the Plan and creating a document for distribution to the public.
II. Description of Required Services
The City is seeking an experienced consulting firm to submit proposals to develop a comprehensive Plan and help re-envision the City’s Parks System. The Plan will provide valuable information for both short-term and long-term planning for current and future improvements, renovation, maintenance, programing, scheduling, strategies, and funding sources.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
140
Request for Proposal
The following general description of the scope of services is not fully complete and only intended as a guide to illustrate the minimum project requirements. Applicants are encouraged to present their own path in producing a comprehensive Plan.
The Consultant shall, at a minimum, provide an inventory and assessment report for all City parks which includes an evaluation and assessment of park amenities. For each park site, the Consultant shall review relevant documents, and prepare a comprehensive Plan that includes design and construction recommendations. The Consultant shall review and evaluate safety concerns, code compliance, upgrade requirements, and constructability.
Potential improvements or upgrades shall include, but are not limited to, access routes, pathways, lighting, irrigation, landscaping, hardscape/paving, playgrounds, play surfaces, turf, picnic area and shelters, sports fields, fencing, restrooms, site amenities, park buildings and parking areas. The table below shows all parks, trails and recreational areas that shall be included as part of this Master Plan study. (Amenity site map attached) Park Name Acres
1 Arcturus Park .75
2 Bay Winds Park .95
3 Boat/Dog Park 3.18
4 Boothbay Park 11.21
5 Bridgeview Park 1.73
6 Catamaran Park 5.88
7 Edgewater Park 8.53
8 Erckenbrack Park 3.48
9 Farragut Park 3.86
10 Gateshead Park .12
11 Gull Park 3.14
12 Ketch Park 1.6
13 Killdeer Park 2.42
14 Leo J. Ryan Park 20.73
15 Leo Park .15
16 Levee Pedway 11.2
17 Marlin Park 3.13
18 Pompano Park .56
19 Port Royal Park 3.98
20 Sea Cloud Park 23.9
21 Shad Park 2.16
22 Shorebird Park 1.57
23 Sunfish Park 2.41
24 Turnstone Park 1.53
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
141
Request for Proposal
TASKS
A. Establish Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives
1. Incorporate themes such as accessible, active, equity, inclusion, environmental stewardship, financial sustainability, operational efficiency, unique and distinctive.
2. Consider future trends and best practices for use of public spaces for recreation, health and wellness, and building community.
B. Existing Conditions Assessment and Facilities Study
1. Review existing plans and policies which are relevant to the City’s Park system. This includes the City’s General Plan, Climate Action Plan, Recreation Center Boardwalk Master Plan, Goose Population Management Plan, Foster City’s Age Friendly City (AFC) Initiative Strategic Plan, previous work on Parks Master Plan.
2. Compile an inventory and assessment of the existing parks, athletic fields, trails, medians, cul-de-sacs, and easements. The analysis should consider the capacity of each amenity (playgrounds, ball fields, sports courts, trails, natural areas, amenities, etc.) as well as their use, functionality, accessibility, condition, comfort, and convenience.
3. Conduct meetings and/or interviews with City staff and other stakeholders to identify existing site challenges, desired improvements, opportunities for activation, and visioning for the parks and recreational spaces.
4. Evaluate opportunities that exist in the City’s undeveloped parks and recreational spaces, including ways to activate the City’s lagoon and waterways that are adjacent to many of the City’s parks.
5. Evaluate opportunities to leverage or connect with the school district, and other park and open space agencies.
C. Outreach and Public Participation
1. Develop and coordinate a robust public participation plan that should include but not be limited to open houses, workshops, intercept events, pop-up kiosks, and online surveys. In coordination with the City, schedule public meetings with the community, focus groups and stakeholders to gather all information needed. Recommend to the City the most effective
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
142
Request for Proposal
way to reach as many people as possible including users and non-users of the existing parks and recreational areas.
2. In coordination with the City, administer a project website and other online engagement tools to share ideas with the community members and keep them apprised of project updates.
3. Prepare handouts, flyers, posters, press releases and other media for distribution including posting on the City’s website and social media.
4. Consult will provide recommendations to a Parks Master Plan Task Force that may be created by the CITY which may include representatives from a wide cross section of community groups and advisory committees, such as the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Committee, City staff, and key stakeholder groups. The group will serve as a sounding board to vet options and strategies based on their inherent community knowledge and work as project ambassadors who will provide updates to their constituents and promote public participation.
5. Conduct formal presentations to the City Council, Parks and Recreation Committee, Planning Commission, and other key stakeholder groups, in addition to providing support for written staff reports and other important written documents.
D. Needs Assessment
1. Perform a comparative analysis of the Parks System with the surrounding Cities of San Mateo, Belmont, San Carlos, Burlingame including similar sized cities in the Bay Area and recommend any improvement opportunity to industry standards and trends.
2. Analyze the Park System usage, needs, desires, and interests of the community today and 20 years from today based on anticipated demographic, economic, and sociologic changes. General Plan growth projections and level of service standards will provide some of the framework for this analysis. Consultant shall use information received from surveys and other public outreach to identify the community’s needs for active and passive recreation opportunities and any forthcoming trends that could possibly impact the of the parks. Use City’s registration data for recreational programming statistics. Conduct a park usage study. Deploy analytics technology for determining and assessing foot traffic to various parks which may be used in assessing usage by the community.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
143
Request for Proposal
3. Identify emerging trends and needs from national and regional studies, regional collaborations, and stakeholder input to ensure parks and recreational spaces meet current and future needs of the community while exploring ways to activate them fully.
4. Seek opportunities to enhance inclusion at existing and new amenities.
5. Evaluate the City’s Park System including various amenities, facilities and sports fields and provide comparative analysis with similar cities in terms of the fee and charges schedule, how they are managed and operated and look for improvement opportunities to meet industry standards and trends.
E. Recommendations
1. Document goals and criteria for evaluating and prioritizing recommended projects to achieve stated goals.
2. Identify and prioritize modifications to existing parks, sports fields, cul-de- sacs, and other City maintained open spaces, incorporating the existing conditions and the costs of all recommended modifications.
3. Identify and prioritize opportunities for acquisition and/or development of new park spaces.
4. Identify and prioritize implementation of new projects in existing park spaces.
5. Identify new or recommended changes to citywide or specific park and field policies.
6. Recommended implementation action plan.
F. Implementation
1. Establish a detailed, prioritized implementation plan that will achieve the Plan’s goal and vision for the City.
2. Provide estimates of annual costs (capital, operating, maintenance, and replacement) and funding sources.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
144
Request for Proposal
III.Deliverables
Work products at a minimum will include the following. This is a sample list and not intended to be a complete listing.
A. A timeline with milestones for completion of the Plan.
B. Periodic status reports to the City and presentations before City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Committee as required.
C. Community questionnaires and surveys administered online and through various outreach media.
D. Project website which includes all the project information, updates and is created and maintained by the consultant and other flyers or outreach material.
E. Public workshops, open houses and intercept activities including all the necessary materials.
F. Technical reports which include information on existing conditions, needs assessments and other analysis.
G. Copies of the Master Plan Administrative Draft, Final Draft incorporating all revisions and of the Final Plan.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
145
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 18
ATTACHMENT B
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the _____ day of ____________, 20___ by and between the City of Foster City hereinafter called "CITY" and ____________________ hereinafter called "CONSULTANT".
RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into with reference to the following facts and circumstances:
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide professional services in the CITY;
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to provide such services to the CITY and; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Services. The services to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall include those services set forth in Exhibit A, which is, by this reference, incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though it were fully set forth herein.
Performance of the work specified in said Exhibit A is hereby made an obligation of CONSULTANT under this Agreement, subject to any changes that may be made subsequently hereto upon the mutual written agreement of the said parties.
Where in conflict, the terms of this Agreement supersede and prevail over any terms set forth in Exhibit A.
2. Term; Termination. (a) The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the date hereinabove written and shall expire upon completion of performance of services hereunder by CONSULTANT. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of (a) above, CITY may with or without cause, direct CONSULTANT to suspend, delay or interrupt Services, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as CITY may determine in its sole discretion. (c) CITY may terminate performance of the Services under this Agreement in whole, or from time to time in part, for default, should CONSULTANT commit a material breach of this Agreement, or part thereof, and not cure
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
146
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 19 such breach within ten (10) calendar days of the date of CITY’s written notice to CONSULTANT demanding such cure, in which case CONSULTANT shall be liable to CITY for all loss, cost, expense, damage and liability resulting from such breach and termination. (d) CITY may terminate performance of the Services under this Agreement in whole, or from time to time in part, for convenience, whenever CITY determines that such termination is in CITY’s best interests, in which case CONSULTANT shall be entitled to recover its costs expended up to the termination date plus reasonable profit thereon to the termination date as this Agreement would otherwise provide, but may recover no other cost, damage or expense. CONSULTANT shall continue its work throughout the course of any dispute, and CONSULTANT’s failure to continue work during a dispute shall be a material breach of this Agreement.
3. Compensation; Expenses; Payment. CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for all services performed by CONSULTANT hereunder in an amount based upon CONSULTANT’s hourly rates during the time of the performance of said services. A copy of CONSULTANT’s hourly rates for which services hereunder shall be performed are set forth in CONSULTANT’s fee schedule marked Exhibit “B” hereof, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the combined total of compensation and reimbursement of costs payable hereunder shall not exceed the sum _____________________ ($________________). Invoices for amounts in excess of _____________________ ($________________) shall not be paid unless the performance of services and/or reimbursement of costs and expenses in excess of said amounts have been approved in advance of performing such services or incurring such costs and expenses by the City Manager (for contracts less than $50,000) or City Council (for contracts $50,000 or more) evidenced by motion duly made and carried and a written contract amendment having been executed.
Compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses hereunder shall be payable upon monthly billing therefor by CONSULTANT to CITY, which billing shall include an itemized statement, briefly describing by task and labor category or cost/expense items billed. Final payment will be made when all Services required under this Agreement have been completed to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY including, without limitation, CONSULTANT's transmittal of all deliverables to CITY required by EXHIBIT A.
CITY shall not incur any charges under this Agreement, nor shall any payments become due to CONSULTANT for any payment period on the Project, until CITY receives all deliverables required under Exhibit A, SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE, for the payment period (if any) and
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
147
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 20 reasonably accepts such deliverables as meeting the requirements of this Agreement. In cases where CONSULTANT has partially completed one or more deliverables due during a payment period, and if CONSULTANT demonstrates diligent progress thereon, then CITY may make a partial progress payment based upon percentage completion of the partially completed deliverables and diligent progress but taking into account any adverse impacts upon CITY. CITY shall not be liable for, and CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to, any payment for Services performed before this Agreement's execution.
4. Additional Services. In the event CITY desires the performance of additional services not otherwise included within the services described in Exhibit A, such services shall be authorized in advance of the performance thereof by the City Manager (for contracts less than $50,000) or City Council (for contracts $50,000 or more) by motion duly made and carried. Such amendment to this Agreement shall include a description of the services to be performed thereunder, the maximum compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses payable therefor, the time of performance thereof, and such other matters as the parties deem appropriate for the accomplishment of such services. Except to the extent modified by written amendment, all other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed incorporated in each such amendment.
5. Records. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain accurate records of all time expended and costs and expenses incurred relating to services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. Said records shall be available to CITY for review and copying during regular business hours at CONSULTANT’s place of business or as otherwise agreed upon by the parties.
6. Authorization. This Agreement becomes effective when endorsed by both parties in the space provided below.
7. Reliance on Professional Skill of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT represents that it has the necessary professional skills to perform the services required and the CITY shall rely on such skills of the CONSULTANT to do and perform the work. In performing services hereunder CONSULTANT shall adhere to the standards generally prevailing for the performance of expert consulting services similar to those to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder.
CONSULTANT represents that it has reviewed Exhibit A and that in its professional judgment the Services to be performed under this Agreement can be performed for a fee within the maximum amount set forth in the
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
148
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 21 Compensation Schedule established in Exhibit A and within the times specified for each individual Project.
CONSULTANT represents that it possesses all necessary training, licenses and permits to perform the Services and that its performance of the Services will conform to the standards of practice of a professional having experience and expertise in performing professional services of like nature and complexity of the Services working on similar, successfully completed projects.
The granting of any progress payment by CITY, or the receipt thereof by CONSULTANT, or any inspection, review, approval or oral statement by any representative of CITY or any other governmental entity, shall in no way waive or limit the obligations in this Paragraph 7 or lessen the liability of CONSULTANT for unsatisfactory Services, including but not limited to cases where the defective or below standard Services may not have been apparent or detected at the time of such payment, inspection, review or approval.
8. Documents. All documents, plans, drawings, renderings, and other papers, or copies thereof, as finally rendered, prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall, upon preparation and delivery to CITY, become the property of CITY.
9. Relationship of Parties. CONSULTANT is an independent Contractor and does not act as City’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. CONSULTANT is not entitled to any benefits that CITY provides to CITY employees, including, without limitation, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within this Agreement regarding direction apply to and concern the result of the CONSULTANT’s provision of Services, not the means, methods, or scheduling of the CONSULTANT’s work. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Services under this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by any governmental entity and shall pay all other taxes not specifically identified in this Agreement as CITY’s responsibility.
10. Schedule. CONSULTANT shall adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A; provided, that CITY shall grant reasonable extensions of time for the performance of such services occasioned by governmental reviews of CONSULTANT’s work product or other unavoidable delays; provided, further, that such unavoidable delay shall not include strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, or other labor disturbances conducted by, or on behalf of, CONSULTANT’s officers or employees.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
149
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 22 CONSULTANT acknowledges the importance to CITY of CITY’s Project schedule and agrees to put forth its best professional efforts to perform its services under this Agreement in a manner consistent with that schedule.
11. Indemnity. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and save harmless CITY, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees, directors, volunteers and agents, from and against any and all claims, suits, actions liability, loss, damage, expense, injury (including, without limitation, economic harm, injury to or death of any person, including an employee of CONSULTANT or its Subconsultants), cost (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation) of every nature, kind or description, at law or equity, which may be brought against, or suffered or sustained by, City of Foster City, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees, directors, volunteers or agents that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to any negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, any Subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed or retained by them, or anyone that they control. In the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the CONSULTANT shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs.
The duty of CONSULTANT to indemnify and save harmless, as set forth herein, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to require CONSULTANT to indemnify City of Foster City, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees and agents against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code.
CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law.
The defense and indemnification obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained within this Agreement.
If CONSULTANT is a “design professional,” as defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Indemnitees harmless against Liability only to the extent such Liability arises out of, pertains to, or relates to CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. In such an event, the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT shall not exceed CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
150
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 23
12. Insurance. Prior to execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY Certificates of Insurance showing satisfactory proof that it maintains the insurance required by this Contract as set forth in EXHIBIT C, Insurance, which are attached and made a part of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall maintain all required insurance throughout the term of this Agreement and as otherwise provided in EXHIBIT C. In the event CONSULTANT fails to maintain any required insurance, and notwithstanding Paragraph 3 above, CITY may (but is not obligated to) purchase such insurance and deduct or retain premium amounts from any sums due CONSULTANT under this Agreement (or CONSULTANT shall promptly reimburse CITY for such expense).
CONSULTANT shall maintain insurance as required by this Agreement to the fullest amount allowed by law and shall maintain insurance for a minimum of five (5) years following completion of this project or service. In the event CONSULTANT fails to obtain or maintain completed operations coverage as required by this Agreement, the CITY at its sole discretion may purchase the coverage required and the cost will be paid by CONSULTANT.
13. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. CONSULTANT certifies that he is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and CONSULTANT certifies that he will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this agreement.
14. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and the employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, advancement, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall at all times be in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Americans With Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
15. Notice. All notices required by this Agreement shall be given to the CITY and CONSULTANT in writing, by first class mail, postage prepaid,
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
151
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 24 addressed as follows:
CITY: City of Foster City
610 Foster City Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404-2299
Attention: ____________________
CONSULTANT: ____________________________
(Fill in CONSULTANT Name, Address, Phone Number, Project Manager and Email Address for CONSULTANT)
16. Non-Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable either in whole or in part.
17. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by both parties.
18. Validity. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.
19. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in the County of San Mateo, California. The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Any suit or action initiated by either party shall be brought in the County of San Mateo, California unless the parties agree otherwise in a written amendment to this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto to enforce any provision of the Agreement, the unsuccessful party will pay the reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation of the successful party.
20. Mediation. Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, the parties shall meet in mediation and attempt to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator. Neither party shall be permitted to file legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated resolution. The costs of the mediator, if any, shall be paid equally by the parties. If a mediated settlement is reached neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party for purposes of the settlement and each party shall bear its own legal costs.
21. Conflict of Interest. CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it presently has no interest, and shall not have any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of work and services required under this Agreement. Without limitation, CONSULTANT represents to and agrees with CITY that CONSULTANT has disclosed any
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
152
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 25 potential conflict of interest, and will have no future conflict of interest, in providing CITY services hereunder, including but not limited to, any interest (financial, share ownership, shared management, shared directors, or reporting responsibilities) CONSULTANT may presently have, or will have in the future, with respect to any other person or entity (including but not limited to potential suppliers, vendors, consultants, contractors, or regulatory agency) which may have an interest in the subject matter of the Services.
22. Liability of CITY.
Except as provided in Exhibit A, Services to be Provided by CONSULTANT and Exhibit C, Insurance, CITY's obligations under this Agreement shall be limited to the payment of the compensation provided for in Paragraphs 1, 3, and 4 of this Agreement,
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall CITY be liable, regardless of whether any claim is based on contract, tort or otherwise, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages, lost profits or revenue, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the Services, or the Project.
CITY shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by CONSULTANT, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to CONSULTANT by CITY. The acceptance or use of such equipment by CONSULTANT or any of its employees shall be construed to mean that CONSULTANT accepts full responsibility for and shall exonerate, indemnify, defend and save harmless CITY from and against any and all claims for any damage or injury of any type, including attorneys' fees, arising from the use, misuse or failure of such equipment, whether such damage be to the CONSULTANT, its employees, CITY employees or third parties, or to property belonging to any of the above.
Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any right or remedy, whether in equity or at law, which CITY or CONSULTANT may have under this Agreement or any applicable law. All rights and remedies of CITY or CONSULTANT, whether under this Agreement or other applicable law, shall be cumulative.
23. Waiver of Default. Waiver of any default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default.
Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided below.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
153
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 26
24. Force Majeure. Except for defaults of subconsultants at any tier, CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the Agreement arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including without limitation failure to reasonably mitigate any adverse impacts (Force Majeure). Force Majeure events include the following:
Acts of God, fires, floods, earthquake, other natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics (other than COVID-19 or variants), abnormal weather conditions beyond the parameters otherwise set forth in this Article, nuclear accidents, strikes, lockouts, freight embargos, interruptions in service by a regulated utility, or governmental statutes or regulations enacted or imposed after the fact (together, “force majeure events”).
Any Force Majeure event with a duration in excess of thirty (30)days entitles either party to terminate this Agreement with written notice to the other party, without further penalty or compensation.
25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Exhibits A, B, C, and D comprise the entire Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first above written by their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf.
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
Dated: _________________________________ Patrick Sullivan, Mayor
(for contracts $50,000 or more)
[REMOVE signature line if less than $50,000]
ATTEST:
Dated: ________________________________ Priscilla Schaus, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Dated:
Benjamin Stock, City Attorney
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
154
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 27
CONSULTANT
Dated:
Type Name & Title of CONSULTANT
Authorized to Sign
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
155
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 28
EXHIBIT A
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED, PAYMENTS, PROJECTS AND SCHEDULE, AND
DELIVERABLES FOR
CIP 301-682 FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT
[EITHER COMPLETE EXHIBIT A OR ATTACH A PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK THAT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION BELOW AND DELETE THE TEXT BELOW]
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
This is an Exhibit attached to, and made a part of and incorporated by reference to the Agreement dated Date of Agreement, by and between Consultant Name, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT" and the City of Foster City, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" providing for professional services.
1.Description of the Project:
1.1 DESCRIPTION: Description of Project
2.Basic Services:
The CITY has developed a general scope of work as described below.
2.1 Task 1 – Description of Task 1
2.2 Task 2 – Description of Task 2
2.3 Task 3 – Description of Task 3
PAYMENTS
1. The maximum payment to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for the Project shall be:
Maximum Payment Amount
2. METHODS OF PAYMENT FOR CONSULTANT’S SERVICES AND EXPENSES:
List Methods of Payment
3. TIMES OF PAYMENTS.
List Times of Payments
PROJECTS AND SCHEDULE
List Project Schedule
DELIVERABLES
CONSULTANT’s deliverables under the Agreement are enunciated throughout the Professional Services Agreement and include but are not limited to the following:
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
156
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 29
1. PROJECT DELIVERABLES
1.1DELIVERABLES: List of Deliverables
1.2OTHER:
2.CONSULTANT SERVICES. The deliverables considered part of CONSULTANT’s professional services are defined as, but are not limited to, the following deliverables:
2.1SERVICES: List of Services
END OF EXHIBIT A
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
157
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 30
EXHIBIT B
FEE SCHEDULE
[Specify Consultant’s hourly rates for which services hereunder shall be performed]
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
158
Parks Master Plan Updated 1/18/2022 31
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE FORMS
CONSULTANT shall provide, in addition to the Certificates of Insurance, original Endorsement affecting the coverages specified in herein on the attached form. No substitute form will be accepted.
This is an Exhibit to, and made a part of and incorporated by reference to the Agreement dated Date of Agreement, by and between Consultant Name, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant”, and the City of Foster City, hereinafter referred to as "City", providing for professional services.
1.Consultant's Duty to Show Proof of Insurance. Consultant, in order to protect City and its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees against all claims and liability for death, injury, loss and damage as a result of Consultant's acts, errors, or omissions in connection with the performance of Consultant's obligations, as required in this Agreement, shall secure and maintain insurance as described below. Consultant shall not perform any work under this Agreement until Consultant has obtained all insurance required under this section and the required certificates of insurance and all required endorsements have been filed with the City's authorized insurance representative, insurance Tracking Services Inc. (ITS). Receipt of evidence of insurance that does not comply with all applicable insurance requirements shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements set forth herein. The required documents must be signed by the authorized representative of the insurance company shown on the certificate. Upon request, Consultant shall supply proof that such person is an authorized representative thereof, and is authorized to bind the named underwriter(s) and their company to the coverage, limits and termination provisions shown thereon, Consultant shall promptly deliver to ITS a certificate of insurance, and all required endorsements, with respect to each renewal policy, as necessary to demonstrate the maintenance of the required insurance coverage for the term specified herein. Such certificates and endorsements shall be delivered to ITS prior to the expiration date of any policy and bear a notation evidencing payment of the premium thereof if so requested. Consultant shall immediately pay any deductibles and self-insured retentions under all required insurance policies upon the submission of any claim by Consultant or City as an additional insured.
1.1 Insurance Requirements
☒ Commercial General Liability Insurance
Commercial General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Contractual Liability Insurance (specifically concerning the indemnity provisions of this Agreement with the City ), Products-Completed Operations Hazard, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy arising out of professional services rendered hereunder, Personal Injury (including bodily injury and death), and Property Damage for liability arising out of Consultant's performance of services under this Agreement. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain no exclusions or limitation for independent contractors working on the behalf of the named insured. Consultant shall maintain the Products-Completed Operations Hazard coverage for the longest period allowed by law following termination of this Agreement. The amount of said insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be the policy limits, which shall be at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence and five million dollars ($5,000,000) aggregate.
*Please note, the City will require a separate additional insured endorsement for the Commercial General Liability policy, listing the “City of Foster City, its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees”.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
159
[FOR THE FOLLOWING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE CONSIDER IF EACH IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED AND FOR THE CONSULTANT.
UNCHECK THE CHECKBOX FOR ANY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT THAT IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE WITH ANY QUESTIONS.] ☒ Business Automobile Liability Insurance
Automobile Liability Insurance against claims of Personal Injury (including bodily injury and death) and Property Damage covering any vehicle and/or all owned, leased, hired and non- owned vehicles used in the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall be at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence.
☒ Workers' Compensation Insurance
Consultant shall submit written proof that Consultant is insured against liability for workers' compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code.
Consultant shall require any Subconsultants to provide workers' compensation for all of the Subconsultants' employees, unless the Subconsultants' employees are covered by the insurance afforded by Consultant. If any class of employees engaged in work or services performed under this Agreement is not covered by California Labor Code section 3700, Consultant shall provide and/or require each Subconsultant to provide adequate insurance for the coverage of employees not otherwise covered. Consultant shall also maintain employer's liability insurance with limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury or disease. ☒ Professional Liability Insurance
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, for liability arising out of, or in connection with, all negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with services to be provided under this Agreement, with no exclusion for claims of one insured against another insured, with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall not be less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and four million dollars ($4,000,000) aggregate.
Installation Floater
Installation Floater, covering the work performed under this Contract, against all risks of direct physical loss. The policy shall cover the Contractor’s labor, materials and equipment, including materials and equipment in transit or away from the project site, to be installed in the existing structure(s). The coverage shall be written for an amount equal to the initial contract amount plus the value of any subsequent change orders, subject to a deductible of not more than [$10,000] payable by Contractor.
Cyber Liability Insurance
Cyber Liability Insurance, covering network risk and cyber liability (including coverage for unauthorized access, failure of security, breach of privacy perils, as well at notification costs and regulatory defense) in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. Such insurance shall be maintained in force at all times during the term of the Contract and for a period of two years thereafter for services completed during the term of the Contract.
1.2 Self-Insured Retention
Any self-insured retentions in excess of $100,000 must be declared on the Certificate of insurance or other documentation provided to City and must be approved by the City Risk Manager. ☒
☒
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
160
1.3 Claims-Made Basis Coverage
If any of the insurance coverages required under this Agreement is written on a claims-made basis, Consultant, at Consultant's option, shall either (i) maintain said coverage for at least five (5) years following the termination of this Agreement with coverage extending back to the effective date of this Agreement; (ii) purchase an extended reporting period of not less than five (5) years following the termination of this Agreement; or (iii) acquire a full prior acts provision on any renewal or replacement policy.
2.City as Additional Insured
On Consultant's Commercial General Liability and Automobile policies, the City, its Council members, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insured's, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured. Any endorsement shall be provided using one of the following three options: (i) on ISO form CG 20 10 1 1 85; or (ii) on ISO form CG 20 37 10 01 plus either ISO form CG 20 10 10 01 or CG 20 33 10 01; or (iii) on such other forms which provide coverage at least equal to or better than form CG 20 10 1 1 85.
3.Insurance terms and conditions:
3.1 Cancellation of Insurance
The above stated insurance coverages required to be maintained by Consultant shall be maintained until the completion of all of Consultant's obligations under this Agreement except as otherwise indicated herein. Each insurance policy supplied by Consultant shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after ten (10) days written notice by Consultant in the case of non-payment of premiums, or thirty (30) days written notice in all other cases. This notice requirement does not waive the insurance requirements stated herein.
Consultant shall immediately obtain replacement coverage for any insurance policy that is terminated, canceled, non-renewed, or whose policy limits have been exhausted or upon insolvency of the insurer that issued the policy.
3.2 All insurance shall be issued by a company or companies admitted to do business in California and listed in the current "Best's Key Rating Guide" publication with a minimum rating of A-; VII Any exception to these requirements must be approved by the City Risk Manager.
3.3 If Consultant is, or becomes during the term of this Agreement, self-insured or a member of a self-insurance pool, Consultant shall provide coverage equivalent to the insurance coverages and endorsements required above. The City will not accept such coverage unless the City determines, in its sole discretion and by written acceptance, that the coverage proposed to be provided by Consultant is equivalent to the above-required coverages.
3.4 For any claims related to the Agreement, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3.5 Insurance coverages in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Consultant for any liability, whether within, outside, or in excess of such coverage, and regardless of solvency or insolvency of the insurer that issues the coverage; nor shall it preclude the City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provision of this Agreement or otherwise in law.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
161
3.6 Failure by Consultant to maintain all such insurance in effect at all times required by this Agreement shall be a material breach of this Agreement by Consultant. City, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from Consultant resulting from said breach.
Alternatively, City may purchase such required insurance coverage, and without further notice to Consultant, City shall deduct from sums due to Consultant any premiums and associated costs advanced or paid by City for such insurance. If the balance of monies obligated to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are insufficient to reimburse City for the premiums and any associated costs, Consultant agrees to reimburse City for the premiums and pay for all costs associated with the purchase of said insurance. Any failure by City to take this alternative action shall not relieve Consultant of its obligation to obtain and maintain the insurance coverages required by this Agreement.
3.7 Should any of the required insurance (other than errors and omissions insurance) be provided under a form of coverage that includes a general annual aggregate limit or provides that claims investigation or legal defenses costs be included in such general aggregate limit, such general annual aggregate limit shall be double the occurrence or claims limit specified above.
3.8 City may (but is under no obligation to) secure project-specific insurance, wrap-up insurance, or administer an owner controlled insurance program ("OCIP"), in which case Consultant and its subconsultants shall communicate this fact to their insurance carriers and request that the risk of this project be excluded from their practice policies. Consultant's fees under this Agreement (and the fee of its subconsultants under subconsultant agreements) shall be reduced by the amount of insurance premiums that may be avoided by Consultant and its subconsultants by virtue of the City's obtaining the project-specific insurance, wrap-up insurance or administering an OCIP, and the exclusion of this project from coverage of Consultant's and subconsultants policies. Construction Manager and its subconsultants shall afford City access to their books and records and cooperate with City in verifying the amount of savings realized.
ATTACHED
1. Insurance Coverage Form
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
162
EXHIBIT C
This INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM modifies or documents insurance provided under the following:
Named Insured: Effective Work Date(s):
Description of Work/Locations/Vehicles:
ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Foster City (CITY)
610 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, CA 94404
Attention: _________________________________
Contract Administrator
Endorsement and Certificates of Insurance Required
The Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (Check all that apply)
Insurer Policy
No.
General Liability: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, (c) premises owned, leased occupied or used by the Named Insured, and/or (d) permits issued for operations performed by the Named Insured. {Note:
MEETS OR EXCEEDS ISO Form # CG 20 10 11 85}
Auto Liability: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
Other: [Cyber Liability, Installation Floater, etc.]
Certificates of Insurance Required (no endorsement needed) (Check all that apply) Insurer Policy No.
Workers Compensation: work performed by employees of the Named Insured while those employees are engaged in work under the simultaneous directions and control of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured.
Professional Liability:
PRIMARY/NON-CONTRIBUTORY: This insurance is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of Additional Insureds.
SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST: The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limit of liability.
PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED'S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS: Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.
CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice (ten (10) days if canceled due to non-payment) by regular mail return receipt requested has been given to the Additional Insured. Such notice shall be addressed as shown above.
WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: The insurer(s) named above agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the CITY.
Nothing herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any provision or condition of the Policy other than as above stated.
SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER I, ______________________________________________________________(print/type name), warrant that I have authority to bind the above-named insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
163
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (original signature required) ORGANIZATION: TITLE:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: ( ) DATE ISSUED:
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
164
ATTACHMENT B
EXHIBIT D
COVID-19 AMENDMENT/ATTACHMENT
(Consulting Agreement Form)
This COVID-19 Amendment/Attachment amends the Agreement between ____________________ (“City”) and ____________________________ (“Consultant”) dated ___________________________.
1. Definitions
A. The 2019 novel coronavirus and the disease it causes are collectively referred to herein as “COVID-19”.
B. A “COVID-19 Condition” is something attributable to COVID-19 not caused by the Consultant (which for purposes herein includes all subconsultants) and beyond its reasonable control including but not limited to COVID-19 Proclamations and supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19, and other circumstances concerning COVID-19 not caused by the Consultant and which are beyond its reasonable control.
C. A “COVID-19 Proclamation” includes but is not limited to orders, directives and guidance concerning COVID-19 that have been issued, and which may be issued from time to time, by public agencies or regulatory bodies, the CDC or OSHA or Cal/OSHA, including without limitation the Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards. Consultant acknowledges that those orders, directives and guidance may require the Project to shut down or otherwise increase the Consultant’s cost or time of performance by calling for things such as social distancing and the use of personal protective equipment. In the event of conflicting COVID-19 Proclamations, the Consultant shall follow the most applicable, restrictive and newest COVID-19 Proclamations.
D. An “Unknown COVID-19 Condition” is a COVID-19 Condition the Consultant did not know about, and reasonably should not have known about, as of the date the Consultant submitted its proposal. The requirements contained in COVID-19 Proclamations issued before submission of a proposal are not Unknown COVID-19 Conditions, and the Consultant will be deemed to have knowledge of those requirements.
E. An “Unknown COVID-19 Cost” is a cost that: (i) is solely attributable to an Unknown COVID-19 Condition; (ii) is reasonable and unavoidable under the circumstances; (iii) is not the result of the Consultant’s failure to comply with the contract documents or a COVID-19 Proclamation; and (iv) is not the result of a subconsultants failure to comply with a COVID-19 Proclamation in connection with the performance of the Services.
2. COVID-19 Conditions and Proposal. Consultant is expected to know and is deemed to have known about COVID-19 Conditions when it submits its proposal, and COVID-19 Conditions must be accounted for in the Consultant’s price and schedule. In order to be entitled to any relief from a COVID-19 Condition, the Consultant must demonstrate that the issue, cost or delay is due to an Unknown COVID-19 Condition.
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
165
3. Compliance with COVID-19 Proclamations.
A. Consultant shall comply with COVID-19 Proclamations in the performance of the Services, irrespective of when the COVID-19 Proclamations are issued, and as they pertains to performance of the Services. The cost of such compliance is non-compensable, except as otherwise expressly stated herein.
B. Consultant is responsible to ensure that its subconsultants and suppliers comply with COVID-19 Proclamations at all times in connection with the performance of their Services.
4. Delay. The Consultant is entitled to a reasonable time extension for an Unknown COVID-19 Condition. Such time extension is non-compensable.
5. City Directed Suspension. The City may suspend Services due to COVID-19 health concerns, even though the Consultant may be allowed to proceed with the Services based on COVID-19 Proclamations. The City may suspend the Services for its convenience. The Consultant is entitled to a time extension for a City Directed Suspension, and the contract amount will be equitably adjusted if and to the extent Consultant incurs increased costs that are Unknown COVID-19 Costs.
6. Compensation for COVID-19 Costs. City will reimburse the Consultant for Unknown COVID-19 Costs that are not included in the schedule of values.
7. Safe Work Practices. Consultant shall implement safe work practices recommended by CDC or OSHA or Cal/OSHA, which may include, inter alia, screening all employees, subconsultants, or others (“worker(s)”) at all locations where Services are performed for signs and symptoms of COVID-19; adopting staggered work schedules, e.g., providing alternating workdays or extra shifts, to reduce the total number of employees on a site at any given time and to ensure physical distancing; identifying choke points where workers are forced to stand together, such as hallways and elevators, ingress and egress points, break areas, and buses, and implement policies to maintain social distancing; coordinating deliveries in line with the employer's minimal contact and cleaning protocols; and instituting a rigorous housekeeping program to reduce dust levels at all exterior locations. Consultant remains fully responsible for following and complying with changes to recommended safe work practices from time to time.
8. Monitoring and Reporting. City may require the Consultant to actively monitor the health of its workers through temperature checks and questionnaires of major COVID-19 symptoms, including but not limited to cough, fever above 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit and shortness of breath. Consultant shall immediately report to City any outbreaks of COVID-19 among its workers. The Consultant shall not knowingly allow any worker who has tested positive with COVID-19 to enter a City building. In the event of an outbreak or an exposure to COVID-19, the City may impose appropriate mitigation strategies which may be in consultation with the public health officer.
9. Conflicts. In the event of an inconsistency between this COVID-19 Amendment and the Agreement, this Addendum shall control.
[Signatures on Next Page]
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
166
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Covid-19 Amendment as of the date set forth above.
CONSULTANT: CITY:
________________________ ____________________________
Signature Signature
________________________ ______________________________ Print Name & Title Print Name & Title
6.6 Attachment 2 - RFP
167
City of Foster City Parks & Recreation Department
Park Amenity Grid
BALLFIELD BEACH CHILDREN’S
PLAY AREA
PICNIC
AREA
TENNIS
COURTS
BASKETBALL
COURTS BIKE PATH PICKLE BALL
COURTS RESTROOM VOLLEYBALL
COURTS
BARBECUE BOAT
LAUNCH
BOCCE
BALL
SOCCER
FIELDS
DOG
PLAYGROUND
PARKS/ACRES
ARCTURUS/.75
BAYWINDS/ 1.3
BOAT /DOG/3.18
BOOTHBAY/11.21
BRIDGEVIEW/3.2
CATAMARAN/5.88
EDGEWATER/8.53
ERCKENBRACK/3.48
FARRAGUT/3.86
GATESHEAD/.12
GULL/3.14
KETCH/1.6
KILLDEER/2.42
LEO J. RYAN/20.73
LEO PARK/.015
LEVEE PEDWAY/11.2
MARLIN/3.13
POMPANO/.56
PORT ROYAL/3.98
SEA CLOUD/23.9
SHAD/2.16
SHOREBIRD/ 3.5
SUNFISH/2.41
TURNSTONE/1.53
6.6 Attachment 3 - 2023 Park Amenities Map
168
City Map
Amphitheater ........... D-3
Arcturus Park ........... E-2
Audubon School ........ B-5
Bay Winds .............. A-2
Boat Park............... D-4
Boothbay Park .......... G-2
Bowditch ............... C-6
Brewer Island School.... C-4
Bridgeview Park ........ A-4
Catamaran Park....... E-3/4
Chamber of Commerce.. C-3
Corporation Yard........ A-3
City Hall ................ C-3
Council Chambers ...... C-3
Dog Park ............... D-4
Edgewater Park......... E-2
Erckenbrack Park ....... C-4
Farragut Park ........... F-3
Fire Department ........ C-3
Foster City School ...... F-2
Gull Park ............... B-4
Hillbarn Theatre......... B-3
Ketch Park.............. E-5
Killdeer Park ............ B-4
Leo J. Ryan Park ..... D- 2/3
Library/Comm. Center .. D-3
Marlin Park ............. D-5
Police Department ...... C-3
Port Royal Park ......... H-3
Post Office............ E-3/4
Recreation Center....... D-3
Sea Cloud Park ..... F/G-4/5
Senior Wing ............ D-3
Shad Park .............. C-5
Shorebird Park........ D/E-6
Sunfish Park ............ D-5
Turnstone Park.......... B-5
VIBE Teen Center . . . . . . . D-3
City of Foster City Parks & Recreation Department
6.6 Attachment 3 - 2023 Park Amenities Map
169
5 1
3 DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Frank Fanara, Parks Maintenance Manager
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,300 WITH CAGWIN AND DORWARD LLC. FOR
GATESHEAD PARK RESTORATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 (CA #1) to the agreement with Cagwin and Dorward, in an amount not to exceed $21,300, to expand the scope of work in the original contract agreement to provide restoration services at Gateshead Park.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As part of the Levee Protection Planning and Improvements Project CIP 327-657 (Levee Project), pathways and landscape elements within various Parks along the levee were improved to conform to the new raised levee elevation. Gateshead Park received new pathways, handrails and drainage elements and was used by Shimmick as a staging area for spoils and supplies for the project, which resulted in significant damage to its irrigation system as well as the passive turf area.
In November 2022, to prevent delays and ensure progress of the Levee Project, an agreement was executed with Cagwin and Dorward by the City Manager to restore Gateshead Park to its preconstruction condition. The construction work was tentatively scheduled for the next open bird nesting restriction window, which was September 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024.
6.7 6.7 Staff Report
170
5 1
3 In October 2023, staff met with Cagwin and Dorward at the park site to prepare for the landscaping work that was planned and scheduled. During the site walk, several issues were identified and discussed pertaining to the park’s present condition which would require more extensive grading and supplies in order to return the Park to its fully restored condition. CA #1, in the amount of $21,300, will provide the necessary services to fully restore Gateshead Park. Funding is available in the approved Levee Improvements Project (CIP 327-657) budget for CA #1.
BACKGROUND
Gateshead Park is a small neighborhood park along Baffin Street that was opened to the public in 1980. It is located adjacent to the levee/pedway near the Belmont Slough and provides public access to the pedway. The park provides picnic tables, a drinking fountain and passive natural turf areas.
The Levee Project is designed to improve the City’s existing levee system and provide flood protection in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines, allow the City to retain FEMA accreditation for the levee, and protect against future sea level rise. This is achieved by raising the levee/Bay Trail. As part of the Levee Project, pathways and landscape elements within various parks adjacent to the levee were improved to conform to the new levee elevation. One of these parks included Gateshead Park.
During construction for the Levee Project, various portions of the irrigation system at Gateshead Park, unidentified on the project plans, sustained damage. Sections of the passive turf areas were damaged as well. Various discussions occurred between the City and the contractor in which there were disputes over the responsibility for the park repairs, namely due to the fact that the irrigation system at Gateshead Park was not shown on the plans. Ongoing discussions involving Tanner Pacific (TPI) and Shimmick pertain to the provision of credits by Shimmick subcontractor, BrightView, for the non- placement of sod and a straight row of irrigation between the park and trail. Due to the park’s location, it is subject to the requirements of the Levee Project’s San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) permit, including the bird nesting restriction window that limits construction activities between September 1 – January 31 each year. In November 2022, based on the progress and pace of work on the levee project known at the time, it was anticipated that the project could be completed by summer 2023. To prevent delay claims on the project, by having Shimmick waiting to perform work in the next bird window, staff removed the restoration work from the scope of the project, directed TPI to seek credits from Shimmick for the damages, and sought informal proposals with third party landscape contractors to restore Gateshead Park to its preconstruction condition. Staff received quotes from three (3) separate landscaping companies and selected Cagwin and Dorward to perform the work.
On February 7, 2023, the City Manager executed an agreement with Cagwin and Dorward, in an amount not-to-exceed $49,050 for the Repair and Landscaping for
6.7 6.7 Staff Report
171
5 1
3 Gateshead Park Restoration. The scope of work consisted of: Detail existing grass and grade areas to the selected level, maintaining a grade of 3”, install three new irrigation control valves and standard NDS valve boxes. Trench and lay appropriately sized PVC schedule 40 pipe in each zone, incorporating up to seventy new Rainbird 1804 sprinklers with Hunter MP rotating nozzles across multiple irrigation zones to ensure optimal coverage. Additionally, provide and install twenty cubic yards of compost and approximately 14,800 sf of Tall Fescue Sod.
ANALYSIS
CA #1 provides for an expanded scope of work including the following tasks:
•Install a 4” Drain line from a new channel drain to an existing sidewalk drain. •Furnish and install an additional 20 cubic yards of amended topsoil where necessary throughout the project to bring site to within 3” of final grade. •Furnish and install 10 cubic yards of compost, rototill, and bring to new grade in north area of new pathway.
•Furnish and install new lateral irrigation line and eleven (11) Rainbird 1806 sprinkler heads with Hunter MPR nozzles along the new pathway into the existing zone.
In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.030, the City Manager has authority to execute contracts up to $50,000. For purchases in excess of $50,000, City Council approval is required.
It is the City’s understanding that any work that was not completed by Shimmick as required by the plans and specifications would be applied as credits towards the Project. Staff will continue to work with TPI to seek credits by the Shimmick subcontractor, BrightView, for the non-placement of sod and a straight row of irrigation which were a part of the original contract specifications.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Approval of this Amendment with Cagwin and Dorward is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as said approval is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.
6.7 6.7 Staff Report
172
5 1
3 FISCAL IMPACT
With the execution of CA #1, the revised contract amount is $71,350.
Current Contract Contract
Amendment
Revised
Contract
Park Rehabilitation 49,050 - 49,050
Additional Soil and Grading 21,300 21,300
Total 49,050 21,300 71,350
CA #1 in the amount of $21,300 to the agreement with Cagwin and Dorward will provide the necessary services to restore Gateshead Park. Funding is available in the approved Levee Improvements Project (CIP 327-657) budget for CA #1.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Contract Amendment No. 1
Attachment 3 – Proposal
6.7 6.7 Staff Report
173
1 5
3 6
RESOLUTION NO. __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,300 WITH CAGWIN AND DORWARD INC. FOR EXPANDED SCOPE
OF WORK FOR RESTORATION OF GATESHEAD PARK AND FINDING THE
PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15304
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2023 the City Manager executed a Professional Services Agreement with Cagwin and Dorward for the Repair, and Landscaping for Gateshead Park Restoration for the City of Foster City for a maximum amount not to exceed $49,050 (“Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the original amount of the Agreement was within the City Manager’s authority under the City’s Purchasing Policy; and
WHEREAS, following the execution of the agreement dated February 8, 2023 Cagwin and Dorward has identified the need to further expand the scope of work to restore Gateshead Park due to unanticipated drainage work necessary to maintain Gateshead Park; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby finds that the approval of this amendment is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15304 (Class 4), minor alterations in the conditions of land not involving removal of trees.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor to execute Contract Amendment No. 1, dated December 18, 2023, to the current Agreement with Cagwin and Dorward Inc. for an additional amount of $21,300 and a total not to exceed amount of $71,350.
6.7 Attachment 1 - Resolution
174
1 5
3 6
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the18th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PATRICK SULLIVAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
6.7 Attachment 1 - Resolution
175
1 5
3 7
ORIGINAL
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
AMENDMENT NO.1
DATE: December 18, 2023 ACCT NO. 327-0910-657-4251
PROJECT NAME: GATESHEAD PARK RESTORATION
TO: CAGWIN & DORWARD LLC.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Cagwin & Dorward LLC. and City of Foster City Based on mutual agreement, Cagwin & Dorward LLC and City of Foster City agree to amend the original Agreement dated February 8th, 2023. (“Agreement”) pursuant to Section 3 of the Agreement to add additional work for specified amounts, which are identified as follows:
ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT $49,050.00
AMOUNT OF AMENDMENT NO.1 $21,300.00
REVISED AGREEMENT AMOUNT $71,350.00
Additional work included in the contract amendment shall be as follows:
Task #1 Install New Drain Line
1. Install 4” drain line from channel
drain at new sidewalk to drain inlet
at street.
2. Backfill with Drain Rock
3. Reinstall soil and repair turf
$5,240.00
Task #2 Furnish and Install Amended top
soil where necessary to bring
grade within 3” of final grade
$3,450.00
Task #3 Furnish and Install Compost
1. Install 10 cubic yards of compost in
area north of new walkway.
2. Rototill and grade
$6,250.00
Task #4 Install new irrigation.
1. Furnish and install new lateral
irrigation line with eleven (11)
Rainbird 1806 sprinkler heads and
tie into existing line.
2. Install eleven (11) Hunter MPR
nozzles.
$6,360.00
Subtotal $21,300.00
REVISED TOTAL AGREEMENT
AMOUNT
$71,350.00
6.7 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 1
176
1 5
3 7
Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
Cagwin & Dorward LLC. have given careful consideration to the work proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, to provide all equipment, furnish all materials as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and to accept as full payment for the prices shown above.
SUBMITTED BY:
Frank Fanara DATE:
PROJECT MANAGER
ACCEPTED BY:
Delanie Boss DATE:
CAGWIN & DORWARD LLC.
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
Derek Schweigart DATE:
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR DISTRICT:
Patrick Sullivan DATE:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
BY: _________________________________________
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: __________________________________________
BENJAMIN L. STOCK, CITY ATTORNEY
6.7 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 1
177
5 1
4 DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Tiffany Oren, Recreation Manager
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $123,286 TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 003-0534-451-4251 IN FY 2023-2024 FOR YOUTH
CAMPS CONTRACT SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the supplemental appropriation of $123,286 to Account Number 003-0534-451-4251 for Youth Camps Contract Services for Fiscal Year 2023-24 for youth camps and enrichment programs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As per the original budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the Recreation Division budgeted $430,668 in total for the Youth Camp program, with $63,200 earmarked specifically for contract services. However, there has been a significant increase in the demand for enrichment contract services since the pandemic as well as an increase in camp- related costs. Projected program revenue is adequate to cover these additional costs, however, the appropriation for youth camp contract services has been exceeded, which necessitates the appropriation of an additional $105,286 for enrichment instructors and $18,000 for camp contract expenses (total $123,286).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Recreation Division provides afterschool care, youth camps, and enrichment programs to students in Foster City through its Youth Camps Program. For Fiscal Year
6.8 6.8 Staff Report
178
5 1
4 2023-24, the Recreation Youth Camps budgeted $63,200 for youth contract services based on participation at the time of the budget preparation and prior years’ average costs and services.
Foster City's youth programs play a crucial role in providing childcare, fostering development, and enhancing the available services for students within the city.
Specifically, our Wednesday afterschool enrichment program caters to 1st-5th graders in all public Foster City elementary schools during the school year. These enrichment classes are offered on minimum school days, providing parents with a valuable option for their children to engage in educational, sports, or recreational activities after school.
This fiscal year there has been a significant increase in participation in these classes.
The program was also on a two-and-a-half-year hiatus during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Staff did not anticipate the sudden increased popularity and demand for the program due to the uncertainty of the market at the time the budget was formulated. The cost for contract instructors to expand class sizes has exceeded the budget appropriation for this line item, which necessitates additional funding to cover the cost. The Session 1 expense for enrichment instructors was $35,531. Staff anticipates an additional $105,286 will be necessary to fund the remainder of the school year for enrichment and $18,000 for seasonal camp contract expenses. This amount should be more than offset by revenue: Sessions 1 and 2 of enrichment so far total $99,364; the total from Sessions 3 and 4 is expected to meet or exceed this.
FY 22/23 Enrichment Revenue FY 23/24 Enrichment
Revenue
Session 1 $18,341 Session 1 $49,498
Session 2 $33,393 Session 2 $49,866
Session 3 $33,190 Session 3 $53,811*
Session 4 $82,688 Session 4 $53,811*
Total $167,612 Est. Total $208,364
*Anticipated revenue based on average of past 4 sessions FY 22/23 Camp Revenue FY 23/24 Camp Revenue
Total $290,060 YTD Total $42,229**
**Reflects revenue received July 1-August 30, 2023 only. Most of the FY 2023-2024 camp revenue will be collected in March to June 2024.
Staff evaluated three options, as noted below, for fully funding, modifying, or pausing the enrichment program. Staff believes Option 1 is the optimal solution since the
6.8 6.8 Staff Report
179
5 1
4 program is still generating revenue for the City and will continue to be a major revenue source when the Recreation Center closes. Seasonal youth camps and enrichment classes are popular programs with families in Foster City as they provide supplemental childcare and educational opportunities.
Option 1
Approve an appropriation for an additional $123,286 to account number 003-0534-451- 4251 for Youth Programs Contract Services for Fiscal Year 2023-24 to continue to offer the program at current levels and capacity.
Option 2
Modify the enrichment program to reduce overall expenditures by putting a cap on the number of students who can register for enrichment classes. This option would not meet the current demand for afterschool programming and could potentially result in the loss of contractors willing to provide instructors for classes based on the reduced opportunity to generate program revenue. Reduce appropriation amount to $70,643 ($52,643 for enrichment classes and $18,000 for camp expenses).
Option 3
Pause enrichment program for remaining school year and resume in fall 2024, reduce appropriation request to $18,000 to fund camp expenses only.
California Environmental Quality Act
Not Applicable
FISCAL IMPACT
The additional appropriation of $123,286 is expected to be offset 100% by increased camp and enrichment program revenues in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Therefore, no additional burden on the General Fund is expected due to this additional appropriation.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Staff Empowerment and Operational Excellence
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution
6.8 6.8 Staff Report
180
1 5
0 6
RESOLUTION NO. __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $123,286 TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 003-0534-451-4251 IN FY 2023-2024 FOR YOUTH CAMPS CONTRACT
SERVICES
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a budget appropriation of $63,200 towards Youth Camps Contracts Services (003-0534-451-4251) in Fiscal Year 2023-2024; and WHEREAS, there has been a significant increase in demand for enrichment contract services as well increased seasonal camp-related costs, such that the forecast upon which the Youth Camps services budget was based has been exceeded; and WHEREAS, incoming Youth Camp program revenue is more than adequate to cover the cost of these additional contract expenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby authorize a supplemental appropriation of $123,286 in Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 to account number 003-0534-451-4251 for Youth Camps Contracts Services.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 18th day of December 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PATRICK SULLIVAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
6.8 Attachment 1 - Resolution
181
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
Justin Lai, Public Works Senior Civil Engineer
Amy Zhou, Public Works Assistant Engineer
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE SPEED LIMITS IN THE 2023
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) AND
DIRECTING STAFF TO FILE THE 2023 E&TS WITH THE
TRAFFIC COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing:
1. The acceptance of the speed limits recommended in the 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (commonly called a “Speed Survey”) prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc; and
2. The direction for staff to file the 2023 Speed Survey sheets for the 34 roadway sections with the Traffic Commission.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) are required to be conducted every five (5) years in order to support posted speed limits for valid speed enforcement by radar. The last E&TS was conducted in 2016, and per the California Vehicle Code (CVC), was extended to be valid for seven (7) years based on certain conditions being met, with an expiry date of December 19, 2023. City Resolution No. 2023-85 executed a Task Order
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
182
with Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. (Hexagon) to conduct a new E&TS.
Based on the speed data collected, an analysis of the collision rate for each study segment, and review of other physical and traffic conditions at each location, and in accordance with the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA- MUTCD), Hexagon recommends reducing the existing speed limit by 5 miles per hour (mph) on one segment of Foster City Blvd., between E. Hillsdale Blvd. and Bounty Dr., while keeping the existing speed limits on all other roadway sections the same. Public Works and Police staff have reviewed the report and recommend the proposed speed limits be accepted, adopted, and filed with the Traffic Commission.
BACKGROUND
The State of California has a mandated process for the establishment of speed limits on public streets. Speed limits are supported by conducting an E&TS or Speed Survey following the procedures listed in the 2014 California Manual for Setting Speed Limits published by the Division of Traffic Operations, California Department of Transportation.
Per the CVC, the speed surveys are good for a period of 5, 7, or 10 years depending on roadway conditions and enforcement procedures.
The E&TS for Foster City streets was last conducted in 2016 and served as a basis to establish the current posted speed limits as accepted and adopted per City Resolution No. 2016-94 on December 19, 2016.
Per the renewal provisions outlined in CVC Section 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I) and the CA- MUTCD, the official standard for traffic control devices the CVC, the renewal time may be extended to seven (7) years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
•The citing officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24-hours of certified radar operator course training.
•The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
In October 2021, upon confirming with the Police Department that the above criteria would be met, the survey was extended by two years, at the discretion of former Interim Public Works Director Ray Towne. The E&TS renewal time extension was transmitted to the Superior Court, Traffic Division on October 25, 2021.
Since the last speed survey is expiring on December 19, 2023, a new survey is needed to maintain or modify speed limits for valid speed enforcement. On August 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-85 authorizing the execution of a Task Order with Hexagon to perform the 2023 E&TS.
Hexagon conducted the survey in compliance with the CA-MUTCD and CVC and produced a final report (Attachment 2) containing the following items:
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
183
•A table describing the existing speed zones in the City; •A description of the methodology used for the engineering and traffic surveys; •A summary of the results of the engineering and traffic surveys; •A table describing the proposed speed zones in the City; and •A copy of the E&TS worksheet for each location.
ANALYSIS
The setting of speed limits requires a rational and defensible procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal system. Speed limit determinations rely on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of drivers (i.e., a speed limit will be able to be selected that is both reasonable and effective by measuring driver’s speeds. Speed limits set by an E&TS are normally set near the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving, and statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed.
Hexagon established speed limit recommendations in accordance with CA-MUTCD, which call for the following actions:
1) Rounding to the nearest 5 miles per hour (mph) increment from the 85 th percentile speed determined by the E&TS for the segment, or 2) Reducing by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, or
3) Rounding down to the nearest 5 mph increment speed below the 85 th percentile speed when rounding up from the 85th percentile speed is required, if no further speed reduction is used per CVC Section 21400 (b).
Additional factors considered per segment, as required by the CA-MUTCD, include prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, collision records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Hexagon conducted speed surveys on 34 segments, spanning the same study locations as the 2016 E&TS with a minor change to split the section of Beach Park Blvd from East Hillsdale Blvd to Foster City Blvd into two segments, at Marlin Ave. Beach Park Blvd was assessed in two segments because of the length of the roadway and to investigate speed limit needs by Bowditch Middle School. In addition to Bowditch Middle School, City Staff identified the segment by Farragut Park as an area of interest due to residential concerns for pedestrian safety.
Staff would also like to acknowledge concerns from residents related to the crosswalk on Gull Ave near Audubon Elementary School. In recent years, implemented improvements include new fluorescent signage, a high visibility crosswalk, and a partially City-funded crossing guard. The Foster City Police Department continues to patrol this area during peak hours and will be providing additional presence during
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
184
school pick-up hours. Staff is collecting speed data at this specific crossing for review.
Furthermore, staff will work with a traffic engineer to review the areas around Audubon and other schools and recommend improvements as part of the upcoming comprehensive citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 2023 Speed Survey Results:
Based on the speed data and collision history, and in accordance with the CA-MUTCD, Hexagon recommends reducing the existing speed limit by 5 mph on one roadway section: Foster City Blvd. between E. Hillsdale Blvd. and Bounty Dr. The specified segment of Foster City Blvd. has a posted speed limit of 40mph. During the study period between 2017 and 2021, there were ten (10) reported collisions on this segment.
Additionally, the segments of Foster City Blvd. north and south of the identified segment have a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Thus, to establish a continuous speed limit across adjacent segments of Foster City Blvd., it is reasonable and prudent to reduce the posted speed limit of Foster City Blvd. between E. Hillsdale Blvd. and Bounty Dr. from 40 to 35 mph, as seen below.
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
185
If accepted, new signage will be installed by the Public Works Department. Public Works will work with the Foster City Police Department to provide outreach and warnings to the public regarding the new speed limit.
Hexagon recommends keeping the existing speed limits on all other roadway sections the same, as permitted by the 85th percentile speeds, roadway conditions, and speed limit recommendation, action 2 of the CA-MUTCD. In the segments by Bowditch Middle School and Farragut Park, radar speed counts, collision records, and physical characteristics of the location do not indicate a need to reduce the posted speed limit.
Although a speed reduction at Bowditch Middle School is not recommended as a result of this study, traffic patterns around Bowditch as well as other schools will be further evaluated as part of the upcoming comprehensive citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. On a broader scale within Foster City, maintaining the same speed limits in the remaining segments is beneficial for eliminating confusion that would arise if speed limits were changed.
It should be noted that, for the purpose of the E&TS, evaluated road segments are long in length to ensure consistent speed limits over reasonable distances. Since school zones only comprise a small section of a segment, school zone needs may be underrepresented in the E&TS. School needs are better evaluated in efforts such as the upcoming City Master Pedestrian and Bicycle plan next year.
Public Works and Police staff have reviewed the report and determined the results to be reasonable. Staff recommends accepting the speeds as listed in the 2023 Speed Survey (Attachment 2), which will lower the existing speed limit on one segment of Foster City Blvd. between E. Hillsdale Blvd. and Bounty Dr., by 5 mph, while keeping the existing speed limits on all other roadway sections the same. It is also recommended that the City Council direct staff to file the 2023 Speed Survey sheets for the 34 roadway sections with the Traffic Commission. Court acceptance of these speeds will depend on the reasons cited in the 2023 Speed Surveys. The speed limits for all streets surveyed will be enforceable for the next 5 years.
CEQA
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “common sense” exemption, the E&TS is an activity that can be seen with certainty to have no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact in adopting and filing the speed limits recommended by the 2023 E&TS.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
186
Public Safety and Social Equity
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
6.9 6.9 Staff Report
187
RESOLUTION NO.____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE SPEED LIMITS IN THE 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS OR ‘SPEED SURVEY’) AND DIRECTING STAFF TO FILE THE 2023 E&TS WITH THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code requires that an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) be conducted every five, seven or ten years, depending on roadway conditions and enforcement procedures, so that speeding tickets issued by the Police, based on the use of radar, can be upheld in Traffic Court; and WHEREAS, the last E&TS for the City of Foster City was adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2016, and per the California Vehicle Code, was extended two additional years based on certain conditions being met, with an expiry date of December 19, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-85, authorizing the award of a Task Order with Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. to perform the new 2023 E&TS; and
WHEREAS, based on the speed data collected, an analysis of the collision rate for each study segment, and review of other physical and traffic conditions at each location, Hexagon recommends reducing the existing speed limit by 5 miles per hour (mph) to 35 mph on the segment of Foster City Blvd., between E. Hillsdale Blvd. and Bounty Dr., while keeping the existing speed limits on all other roadway sections the same; and
WHEREAS, Public Works and Police staff reviewed the E&TS report, found the results to be reasonable, and recommend that the proposed speed limits be accepted, adopted, and filed with the Traffic Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby authorize:
1. The acceptance of the speed limits recommended in the 2023 E&TS Report (commonly called a “Speed Survey”) prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc; and
2. Staff to file the 2023 Speed Survey sheets for the 34 roadway sections with the Traffic Commission.
6.9 Attachment 1 - Resolution
188
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 18th day of December, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PATRICK SULLIVAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
6.9 Attachment 1 - Resolution
189
Reviewed By: Memorandum
Date: November 20, 2023
To: Amy Zhou, Foster City Public Works
From: Rueben Rodriguez, Gary Black, Jocelyn Lee
Subject: Foster City 2023 Engineering and Tr affic Survey (E&TS) Study Report
Introduction
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) study on 34 study locations in Foster City, California. This study has been conducted in accordance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) for the establishment of posted speed zones. The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for maintaining or modifying the posted speed limits on each of the study locations.
The study segments, along with the current posted speed limit at each location, are listed below and are shown on Figure 1.
Study Segments
1. Altair Avenue from East Hillsdale Bo ulevard to Edgewater Boulevard (25 mph)
2. Baffin Street from Edgewater Boulevard to Cornwallis Lane (35 mph)
3. Balclutha Drive from Foster City Boul evard to Flying Cloud Drive (30 mph)
4. Beach Park Boulevard from Polaris Av enue to Edgewater Boulevard (25 mph)
5. Beach Park Boulevard from Edgewater Bo ulevard to Foster City Boulevard (35 mph) 6a. Beach Park Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Marlin Avenue (35 mph) 6b. Beach Park Boulevard from Marlin Avenue to Foster City Boulevard (35 mph)
7. Boothbay Avenue from Edgewater Boul evard to Port Royal Avenue (30 mph)
8. Bounty Drive from Shell Boulevar d to Foster City Boulevard (30 mph)
9. Catamaran Street from Shell Boulev ard to Beach Park Boulevard (30 mph)
10. Catamaran Street from Shell Boulevard to Marlin Avenue (30 mph)
11. Chess Drive from City Limits to Foster City Boulevard (30 mph)
12. East Third Avenue from City Limits to Foster City Boulevard (45 mph)
13. East Third Avenue from Foster City Boulevard to Easterly Limit (40 mph)
14. East Hillsdale Boulevard from City Limits to Edgewater Boulevard (40 mph)
15. East Hillsdale Boulevard from Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard (35 mph)
16. East Hillsdale Boulevard from Foster City Boulevard to Gull Avenue (35 mph)
17. Edgewater Boulevard from City Limits to Beach Park Boulevard (40 mph)
18. Edgewater Boulevard from Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin Street (35 mph)
19. Farragut/Halsey Boulevards from Beach Park Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard (25 mph)
20. Foster City Boulevard from East Third Avenue to East Hillsdale Boulevard (35 mph)
21. Foster City Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive (40 mph)
22. Foster City Boulevard from Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard (35 mph)
23. Gull Avenue from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard (30 mph)
24. Marlin Avenue from Catamaran Street to Beach Park Boulevard (30 mph)
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
190
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 2
25. Metro Center Boulevard from Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard (35 mph)
26. Pitcairn Drive from Edgewater Boulevard to Aruba Lane (35 mph)
27. Polaris Avenue from Altair Avenue to Beach Park Boulevard (25 mph)
28. Polynesia Drive from Foster City Boulevard to Flying Mist Isle (30 mph)
29. Port Royal Avenue from Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard (30 mph)
30. Shell Boulevard from Metro Center Boulevard to East Hillsdale Boulevard (35 mph)
31. Shell Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive (35 mph)
32. Shell Boulevard from Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard (35 mph)
33. Vintage Park Drive from Foster City Boulevard to Metro Center Boulevard (30 mph)
For consistency, the labeling above matches the labeling from the Foster City 2016 E&TS report prepared by others. However, per City staff recommendation, location 6 was split into two sections as labeled above.
Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Setting Posted Speed Limits Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) are required by the State of California to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed-measuring devices.
CVC Section 627 defines an “engineering and traffic survey” and requires that such surveys be conducted in accordance with the methodology prescribed in the current edition of the CA MUTCD.
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD discusses speed limits, speed limit signage, and the procedures required for the engineering and traffic surveys necessary to establish speed limits. Hexagon’s approach to speed zone surveys has been developed to satisfy the requirements of the CVC and the CA MUTCD.
The CA MUTCD states that all engineering and traffic surveys are to include consideration of the following:
x Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, x Collision records, and
x Highway, traffic, and roadside conditio ns not readily apparent to the driver.
Speed data are to be collected by a radar gun or other device that is capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free-flowing vehicles. The speed data that are collected in the field are then processed to determine the critical speed. The critical speed, or 85th percentile speed, is the speed at or below which 85 percent of motorists drive on a given roadway segment. In other words, 85 percent of traffic moves at or below the critical speed in a specified location in free-flowing conditions. The CVC and CA MUTCD state that the 85th percentile speed is the primary factor for setting speed limits. Speed limits established on the basis of 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the actions of one or a few individuals.
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
191
San Mateo Bridge
San
Mateo
Redwood
City
Belmont
Foster
City
= 35 MPH
= 45 MPH
= 25 MPH
= 30 MPH
= 40 MPH
Existing Posted
Speed Limits
XX = Study Segment
Number
= Foster City
1 2
18 29
7 4 27
311
25 30
31 16 23
21 28
22 24
2033
14 15
17 12
13 8
9 10
32 19
26 5
6B
6A
E 3rd Ave
E Hillsdale Blvd
Foster City Blvd
Shell Blvd
Edgewater Blvd
Gull Ave
Beach Park Blvd
Marlin Ave
Baffin St
Chess Dr
Catamaran St
Pitcairn Dr
Vintage Park Dr
Polaris Ave
Port Royal Ave
Metro Center Blvd
Boothbay Ave
Polynesia Dr
Altair Ave
Hal
sey BlvdFarragut Blvd
101
92 Balclutha DrBalclutha
Dr
Bounty DrBounty Dr
Balclutha Dr
Bounty Dr
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study
Figure 1
Study Locations and Existing Posted Speed Limits
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
192
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 4
Other factors that may be considered when determining the appropriate posted speed limit for a particular street segment include collision experience, road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, sight distance, parking practices, bicycle and pedestrian activity, and the roadside environment.
The CA MUTCD notes that “other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
x Road characteristics, shoulder conditio n, grade, alignment, and sight distance; x The pace; *
x Roadside development and environment;
x Parking practices and pe destrian activity, and
x Reported collision experience for at least a 12- month period.”
* The CA MUTCD defines the pace speed “as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles.”
After defining the requirements for an E&TS, the CA MUTCD further states that “When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
x Residential density…[specific criteria for de termining residential density are provided, however, these are not used as part of this E&TS]
x Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.”
The CA MUTCD also states that “Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.” There are ten segments in this study that are less than one-half mile long, and three segments that are only slightly longer than one-half mile (between 0.5 and 0.6 miles). In cases where a segment is less than 0.5 mile long, consideration is sometimes also given to the appropriate speed limit for contiguous segments, so as to avoid very short speed zones.
Data Collection
Speed and average daily traffic (ADT) volume data were collected in September and October 2023, at each of the study locations. Speed data were gathered through radar. Road tubes were used to collect vehicle counts in both directions for a 24-hour period, which was utilized in the calculation of collision rates. The radar speed data is provided as Attachment 1 and the ADT volume data is provided as Attachment 2.
Speed data were collected to represent the prevailing speeds of each study segment. The locations where speeds were collected were chosen away from traffic control devices, along straight sections, and away from driveways. As prescribed in the CA MUTCD, speed measurements were taken during off-peak hours and while the weather was dry and had no unusual conditions. For each location, there were 150 speed data points collected per direction of travel, for a total of 300 speed data points for each study location.
Table 1 presents the existing posted speed limit, the combined 85th percentile speed for both directions, and Hexagon’s recommended posted speed limit for each of the study locations. Note that the recommended posted speed limit is the same as the existing posted speed limit for each study segment, except location 21 as described below.
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
193
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 5
Collision Records
As prescribed in the CA MUTCD, collision records for each of the study segments were reviewed.
Collision records for the study area were obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) online database for the 5- year period from January 2017 through December 2021.
The collision rates for the study locations are expressed in collisions per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment.
This information was then entered into the following formula, obtained from the Caltrans Crash Data on California State Highways report, to determine the collision rate:
ͳǡͲͲͲǡͲͲͲ
ݏݕܽ݀
ݎܽ݁ݕݒכ݈כ
R = collision rate (collisions/million vehicle miles)
C = collisions (number of collisions over the time period) t = time period covered (in years)
l = length of segment (in miles)
v = traffic volume (average daily traffic)
During the 5-year period examined, there were 139 total reported collisions on the street segments included in this study. The average collision rate for the study locations was 0.567 collisions per million vehicle miles for the 5-year period examined.
Table 2 presents the number of collisions on each street segment, the length of the segment, the average daily traffic (ADT) on each segment, and the calculated number of collisions per million vehicle miles for each segment. Note that the CA MUTCD and CVC do not provide a standard threshold for collision rates nor guidance for the consideration of speed reduction based on collision rate only, but rather the collision rates are to be considered in conjunction with the radar data and field review.
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
194
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 6
Table 1 (Segments 1 through 23)
2023 Existing Posted Speed Limits, Measured Speeds, and Recommended Posted Speed Limits
Existing Recommended
Posted 85th Posted
Speed Percentile Speed
ID # Street Segment Limit Speed 1 Limit2
Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City
Boulevard 35 39 35
1 Altair Avenue East Hillsdale Boulevard to
Edgewater Boulevard 25 29 25
4 Beach Park Boulevard Polaris Avenue to Edgewater
Boulevard 25 33 25
3 Balclutha Drive Foster City Boulevard to Flying
Cloud Drive 30 34 30
2 Baffin Street
7 Boothbay Avenue Edgewater Boulevard to Port Royal
Avenue 30 34 30
Edgewater Boulevard to Cornwallis
Lane 35 39 35
6B Beach Park Boulevard Marlin Avenue to Foster City
Boulevard 35 38 35
6A Beach Park Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Marlin Avenue 35 39 35
5 Beach Park Boulevard
9 Catamaran Street Shell Boulevard to Beach Park
Boulevard 30 34 30
8 Bounty Drive Shell Boulevard to Foster City
Boulevard 30 33 30
11 Chess Driv e City Limits to Foster City Boulev ard 30 34 30 10 Catamaran Street Shell Boulevard to Marlin Avenue 30 34 30 13 East Third Avenue Foster City Boulevard to Easterly
Limit 40 44 40
12 East Third Avenue City Limits to Foster City Boulev ard 45 49 45 15 East Hillsdale Boulevard Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard 35 39 35
14 East Hillsdale Boulevard City Limits to Edgewater Boulevard 40 43 40 17 Edgewater Boulevard City Limits to Beach Park Boulevard 40 44 40 16 East Hillsdale Boulevard Foster City Boulevard to Gull Avenue 35 39 35
19 Farragut/Halsey Boulevards Beach Park Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard 25 29 25
18 Edgewater Boulevard Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin
Street 35 39 35
21 Foster City Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive 40 44
20 Foster City Boulevard East Third Avenue to East Hillsdale Boulevard 35 39 35
35 23 Gull Avenue East Hillsdale Boulevard to Beach
Park Boulevard 30 34 30
22 Foster City Boulevard Bounty Drive to Beach Park
Boulevard 35 39 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
195
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 7
Table 1 (Continued, Segments 24 through 33)
2023 Existing Posted Speed Limits, Measured Speeds, and Recommended Posted Speed Limits
Existing Recommended
Posted 85th Posted
Speed Percentile Speed
ID # Street Segment Limit Speed 1 Limit2
Notes:
1 Based on radar speed data collected in September and October 2023. 33 Vintage Park Drive Foster City Boulev ard to Metro
Center Boulevard 30 34 30
32 Shell Boulevard Bounty Drive to Beach Park
Boulevard 35 39 35
31 Shell Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty
Drive 35 39 35
30 Shell Boulevard Metro Center Boulevard to East
Hillsdale Boulevard 35 39 35
29 Port Royal Avenue Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater
Boulevard 30 34 30
28 Polynesia Drive Foster City Boulevard to Flying Mist Isle 30 34 30
27 Polaris Avenue Altair Av enue to Beach Park
Boulevard 25 29 25
26 Pitcairn Driv e Edgewater Boulevard to Aruba Lane 35 39 35 25 Metro Center Boulevard Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard 35 39 35
24 Marlin Avenue Catamaran Street to Beach Park
Boulevard 30 34 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
196
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 8
Table 2 (Segments 1 through 23)
Collision Rates for the 5-Year Period from January 2017 through December 2021
Average
Daily Length of Number of Collision > Avg.
Traffic Segment Reported Rate Rate
ID # Street Segment (ADT)1 (in miles) Collisions C/MVM2 of 0.567 No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
14 10
3 0
1 13 0.503
0.822
0.467
0.370
0.249
1.286
0.238
0.417
0.527
0.641
0.000
15 3
1 0
1 0
6 3
1 Yes
No
Yes
No
No
0.967
No
No
0.61 0.000
1.568
0.000
0.544
0.452
0.261
2.646
0.000
2.202
0.000
0.352
0.278
2 2
0 4
0 2
4 19
6 23 Gull Avenue East Hillsdale Boulevard to Beach
Park Boulevard 2,850 0.91
22 Foster City Boulevard Bounty Drive to Beach Park
Boulevard 4,070 0.63
21 Foster City Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive 18,570 0.56
20 Foster City Boulevard East Third Avenue to East Hillsdale Boulevard 23,282 0.79
19 Farragut/Halsey Boulevards
16 East Hillsdale Boulevard Foster City Boulevard to Gull Avenue 11,534 0.61
15 East Hillsdale Boulevard Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard 18,914 0.67
18 Edgewater Boulevard Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin
Street 6,816 0.97
17 Edgewater Boulevard City Limits to Beach Park Boulev ard 19,130 1.16 Beach Park Boulevard to Beach
Park Boulevard 1,397
12 East Third Avenue City Limits to Foster City Boulev ard 8,227 0.96 11 Chess Driv e City Limits to Foster City Boulev ard 11,547 0.27 14 East Hillsdale Boulevard City Limits to Edgewater Boulev ard 22,126 0.64 13 East Third Avenue Foster City Boulevard to Easterly
Limit 4,045 0.57
8 Bounty Drive Shell Boulevard to Foster City
Boulevard 2,219 0.29
7 Boothbay Avenue Edgewater Boulevard to Port Royal
Avenue 863 0.48
10 Catamaran Street Shell Boulevard to Marlin Avenue 3,531 0.41 9 Catamaran Street Shell Boulevard to Beach Park
Boulevard 1,531 0.65
5 Beach Park Boulevard Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard 4,650 1.30
4 Beach Park Boulevard Polaris Avenue to Edgewater
Boulevard 1,442 0.71
6B Beach Park Boulevard Marlin Avenue to Foster City
Boulevard 2,185 0.96
6A Beach Park Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Marlin Avenue 3,218 1.13
1 Altair Avenue East Hillsdale Boulevard to
Edgewater Boulevard 2,023 0.28
3 Balclutha Drive Foster City Boulevard to Flying
Cloud Drive 832 0.42
2 Baffin Street Edgewater Boulevard to Cornwallis
Lane 625 0.34
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
197
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 9
Table 2 (Continued, Segments 24 through 33)
Collision Rates for the 5-Year Period from January 2017 through December 2021
Field Review and Other Considerations
The E&TS is intended to identify any conditions that a driver may not be aware of that would warrant a different speed limit, such as crosswalks or driveways behind blind curves. A review of field conditions for each study segment was conducted to determine if there are other factors that may or may not be readily apparent to the driver, which would affect the selection of an appropriate speed limit. These include:
x Pedestrian and bicyclist facilities
x Road characteristics (includi ng number of lanes and lane striping patterns), shoulder condition, grade, and alignment
x Sight distance defici encies and other factors related to visibility x Roadside development and environment
x Number, spacing and offsets of intersections and driveways x Presence and frequency of on-street parking
x Other unusual conditions not readily apparent to motorists that could affect traffic flow and safety
Hexagon reviewed the field conditions of each study location and noted all such conditions in the E&TS worksheets included in Attachment 3. In addition, Hexagon highlighted other considerations for the study locations listed below.
Average
Daily Length of Number of Collision > Avg.
Traffic Segment Reported Rate Rate
ID # Street Segment (ADT)1 (in miles) Collisions C/MVM2 of 0.567 Notes:
1 Based on tube count data collected in September and October 2023. 2 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
26 Pitcairn Driv e Edgewater Boulevard to Aruba Lane 3,022 0.69 0 0.000 No 20 . 2 5 1 No
25 Metro Center Boulevard Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard 11,450 0.72 10 0.665 Yes
24 Marlin Avenue Catamaran Street to Beach Park
Boulevard 4,452 0.98
27 Polaris Av enue Altair Avenue to Beach Park
Boulevard 1,984 0.57 0 0.000 No
28 Polynesia Drive Foster City Boulevard to Flying Mist Isle 1,340 0.43 0 0.000 No
29 Port Royal Av enue Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater
Boulevard 1,137 1.45 2 0.665 Yes
30 Shell Boulevard Metro Center Boulevard to East
Hillsdale Boulevard 6,194 0.24 3 1.106 Yes
31 Shell Boulevard East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty
Drive 10,588 0.42 9 1.109 Yes
Yes
33 Vintage Park Drive Foster City Boulevard to Metro
Center Boulevard 10,938 0.75 1 0.067 No
32 Shell Boulevard Bounty Driv e to Beach Park
Boulevard 3,748 0.47 2 0.622
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
198
Foster City 2023 E&TS Study November 20, 2023
Page | 10
Location 5 - Beach Park Boulevard from Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
As part of the E&TS process, City staff requested a review of Beach Park Boulevard near Farragut Park, which is along location 5. This section of Beach Park Boulevard is four lanes, divided, includes bike lanes in both directions, and has a posted speed of 35 mph. There were two reported collisions along this section, both at the intersection of Farragut Boulevard and Beach Park Boulevard, during the study period from January 2017 through December 2021. The radar speed data showed 85th percentile speeds of 38 mph eastbound and 39 mph westbound. The radar speed counts, collision records, and physical characteristics of this location do not indicate a need to reduce the posted speed limit.
Location 6b - Beach Park Boulevard from Marlin Avenue to Foster City Boulevard As part of the E&TS process, City staff requested a review of Beach Park Boulevard near Bowditch Middle School, which is along location 6b. This section of Beach Park Boulevard is four lanes, undivided, includes bike lanes in both directions, includes parking on the west side, and has a posted speed of 35 mph. There were no reported collisions on Beach Park Boulevard near Bowditch Middle School during the study period from January 2017 through December 2021. The radar speed data showed 85th percentile speeds of 38 mph northbound and 39 mph southbound.
The radar speed counts, collision records, and physical characteristics of this location do not indicate a need to reduce the posted speed limit.
Location 17 - Edgewater Boulevard from City Limits to Beach Park Boulevard At the intersection of Edgewater Boulevard and Regulus Street, which is along location 17, there were four reported collisions during the study period from January 2017 through December 2021, three of which had a southbound vehicle as the at fault vehicle. Hexagon recommends that the City monitor this location and consider increasing the length of the red curb in the northwest corner of the intersection to increase the sight distance.
Location 21 - Foster City Boulevard from East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive This section of Foster City Boulevard is four lanes, divided, includes some on-street parking and bicycle facilities, and has a posted speed of 40 mph. There were ten reported collisions along this section during the study period from January 2017 through December 2021. The adjacent sections of Foster City Boulevard (study locations 20 and 22) have an existing posted speed of 35 mph. In order to remain consistent with the adjacent segments, it is recommended that the posted speed limit be reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph.
Recommended Posted Speed Limits
Based on the speed data collected, an analysis of the collision rate for each study segment, and Hexagon’s review of other physical and traffic conditions at each study location, a recommendation for maintaining or modifying the existing posted speed limit has been made, as shown in Table 1.
Note that we recommend maintaining the existing posted speed limit at each study segment, except location 21 as described above. An E&TS worksheet that includes a summary of the analysis for each study location along with the signature and stamp of the engineer of record is provided in Attachment 3.
Attachments: Attachment 1 – Radar Speed Data
Attachment 2 – ADT Volume Data
Attachment 3 – E&TS Worksheets
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
199
Attachment 1
Radar Speed Data
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
200
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
23 25 30 30 27 29
29 25 24 25 25 26
26 23 29 22 23 30
21 30 29 26 29 25
23 23 26 20 30 28
25 26 26 30 27 24
22 28 26 26 27 30
30 22 28 28 24 27
26 26 24 26 20 21
24 27 21 29 27 26
28 23 22 26 20 20
30 22 30 25 29 30
26 21 23 30 21 29
28 24 24 21 21 21
27 20 25 26 23 27
20 22 21 23 29 26
26 20 25 25 21 22
23 27 27 26 29 30
22 23 27 22 27 25
20 27 22 28 23 26
20 23 24 21 27 26
28 23 25 28 26 21
24 20 29 27 25 20
26 20 25 24 26 27
30 29 28 28 21 30
29 24 29 30 22 27
22 26 22 21 25 20
21 25 22 27 24 30
25 30 26 28 22 26
30 23 21 29 29 21
30 23 26 22 26 24
22 29 30 24 25 24
25 25 30 25 20 25
30 28 28 30 30 20
24 21 27 20 22 29
30 30 21 30 23 29
21 22 26 23 20 21
24 22 23 23 30 30
28 23 27 27 22 26
27 20 30 25 22 26
29 29 21 26 25 26
20 30 25 28 28 30
29 27 22 30 29 29
25 28 28 20 22 30
30 26 24 28 25 27
26 25 29 26 22 27
25 28 24 28 26 30
24 26 28 22 27 28
28 28 28 24 28 20
22 28 26 27 21 23
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 1. Altair Ave E.O Polaris Ave
Posted MPH: 25
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
201
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
36 36 30 30 40 38
34 31 37 36 30 31
35 38 31 33 39 39
38 35 39 32 34 37
36 34 36 32 33 36
35 30 38 31 34 38
33 40 35 38 40 40
39 36 33 36 39 37
30 30 30 35 40 40
40 39 36 37 33 33
32 34 30 31 34 38
30 37 40 35 40 38
38 35 35 37 35 32
39 38 38 38 39 33
32 33 37 35 34 33
39 35 34 38 33 38
35 33 34 33 36 39
39 36 32 35 38 31
32 33 36 31 37 36
30 33 39 36 35 39
31 39 31 31 35 33
38 33 30 30 31 37
31 38 40 31 37 36
39 35 30 34 34 34
38 37 32 34 31 34
30 37 40 35 31 35
35 35 30 38 40 30
40 35 30 34 36 33
35 32 35 33 35 31
33 34 40 33 33 34
40 37 38 40 35 35
30 30 33 35 32 38
40 30 38 31 38 35
40 30 33 30 40 38
33 32 30 36 33 39
33 33 33 32 34 33
37 35 30 37 35 39
39 33 30 34 37 31
37 38 31 35 38 37
35 40 36 33 36 40
38 36 40 30 39 32
36 35 30 34 30 40
34 40 30 31 39 33
34 36 32 30 35 40
35 38 32 34 32 32
37 32 38 38 38 36
35 36 37 38 37 30
31 34 37 39 40 35
32 37 36 40 39 30
39 35 39 40 36 38
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 2. Baffin St N.O Antigua Ln
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
202
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
30 25 32 31 29 32
31 26 28 26 30 30
25 26 25 35 31 34
25 28 27 33 33 31
27 26 35 34 30 28
25 25 25 31 33 35
34 26 26 26 25 26
34 28 35 34 29 32
33 25 26 28 28 30
25 27 35 26 27 33
27 33 32 33 33 26
35 25 29 31 33 35
26 31 30 35 29 31
32 29 25 33 32 33
33 28 35 30 35 33
30 34 30 33 28 34
30 30 26 25 27 30
25 27 28 33 27 31
33 25 26 32 28 27
30 28 35 32 30 32
28 33 31 35 34 34
26 31 33 31 34 34
28 34 26 33 27 26
34 31 27 29 31 35
31 25 33 27 25 32
29 28 32 33 28 27
33 35 34 29 33 30
30 34 31 33 34 28
25 28 28 26 35 29
28 35 29 33 31 33
26 26 29 29 28 34
26 31 25 35 25 33
27 31 25 27 29 25
29 34 33 34 33 33
30 30 25 31 32 35
35 27 26 26 27 26
33 35 32 26 25 27
25 33 34 31 26 26
27 28 35 32 33 27
26 35 35 26 30 26
27 26 27 26 29 33
29 28 32 30 32 27
34 26 29 29 28 25
27 29 27 33 30 28
34 30 27 31 33 27
29 31 28 30 25 32
30 32 34 30 30 30
32 26 30 28 30 33
32 31 28 31 34 33
28 28 28 26 28 32
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 3. Balclutha Dr N.O Nina Ln
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
203
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
25 33 32 28 31 26
33 26 35 25 28 28
32 32 29 25 27 28
26 30 34 33 27 25
31 28 27 33 32 31
29 26 30 28 29 32
29 30 34 33 32 32
28 34 26 25 28 25
30 33 27 28 28 32
27 33 31 26 27 33
31 31 30 26 26 32
25 34 27 26 29 29
31 32 34 27 34 26
25 33 34 35 27 26
28 34 29 25 29 29
28 32 35 30 26 31
28 32 29 30 31 26
26 31 30 34 31 34
33 35 33 29 28 33
33 26 28 30 30 35
34 25 32 31 27 35
32 31 27 35 29 35
31 28 25 27 32 26
31 33 29 35 32 27
32 33 26 35 32 34
27 27 35 32 25 25
34 35 31 31 25 31
32 30 27 27 33 28
29 32 29 31 27 30
35 35 28 31 34 29
25 34 25 31 25 27
25 31 31 32 28 34
33 29 32 30 27 29
26 31 34 33 28 30
30 26 35 27 32 30
32 29 26 34 28 31
25 29 31 31 27 34
31 30 33 32 34 27
25 33 27 29 27 31
27 33 26 27 30 28
31 31 30 35 26 25
28 35 31 32 30 29
31 27 35 27 27 35
29 32 33 28 30 32
33 32 25 26 30 32
30 35 33 30 33 28
29 33 29 34 31 27
28 30 33 28 26 26
29 30 34 28 33 33
30 27 32 34 32 31
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 4. Beach Park Blvd N.O Vega Cir
Posted MPH: 25
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
204
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
35 37 38 39 34 33
33 40 34 40 40 37
34 38 36 30 31 38
40 39 35 34 33 35
33 38 38 40 37 32
38 37 40 40 39 39
30 36 30 38 32 37
36 34 36 32 36 34
37 33 31 35 36 35
37 33 37 33 38 30
31 34 34 40 34 32
31 35 39 33 36 34
37 36 38 39 37 35
34 35 40 39 36 30
38 37 35 35 38 33
30 40 31 40 38 38
35 35 35 35 33 32
37 39 37 39 35 38
36 33 37 37 36 30
34 34 32 37 37 34
34 32 31 40 33 37
38 35 39 33 30 32
40 34 40 36 37 30
35 38 38 39 30 37
36 32 36 38 38 40
38 38 33 37 31 40
31 36 39 40 34 35
39 30 36 33 35 37
37 33 34 37 38 40
33 36 36 40 39 32
34 34 31 37 31 39
35 33 30 30 36 36
37 35 39 35 33 35
36 38 33 33 36 33
39 32 39 34 32 30
39 31 33 34 37 40
39 39 30 37 35 31
32 33 33 31 32 40
34 40 35 37 36 35
38 36 39 31 37 38
39 31 40 35 31 30
37 31 30 38 30 32
31 30 32 36 33 34
37 37 36 31 32 31
37 34 37 39 38 37
30 33 30 30 34 38
31 32 34 38 30 36
35 32 31 39 35 38
36 37 39 31 31 31
32 35 30 40 36 30
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 5. Beach Park Blvd E.O Lord Ivelson Ln
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
205
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
31 40 36 34 31 37
34 39 39 40 36 34
30 38 32 30 34 32
38 34 37 38 35 33
37 32 32 30 30 32
38 35 36 31 37 39
36 38 40 32 39 38
40 38 33 31 34 34
35 37 35 32 39 35
33 37 32 30 40 37
39 34 34 38 39 39
30 35 35 39 32 30
30 33 33 33 31 38
38 33 30 36 38 32
40 33 33 39 37 37
35 35 34 40 37 40
37 36 30 31 40 37
38 40 33 39 36 36
35 40 40 37 39 35
30 38 32 35 31 31
38 32 35 40 31 38
32 35 31 39 36 31
31 35 31 33 32 35
34 32 39 35 33 30
40 31 34 37 36 36
39 35 36 30 32 37
32 32 36 35 35 31
31 39 38 37 37 32
32 37 38 30 36 35
36 36 33 34 35 32
35 30 33 38 37 31
32 34 36 34 40 40
36 40 33 36 39 40
40 39 39 34 39 36
30 31 37 33 35 40
35 40 36 34 40 38
38 33 40 40 32 34
40 38 39 31 38 32
31 34 32 30 30 36
31 34 30 34 37 39
39 40 35 35 40 30
30 39 39 33 31 39
31 39 34 39 31 38
34 37 36 35 31 36
37 32 31 33 30 32
38 36 34 34 34 36
32 35 36 35 35 33
36 33 37 31 37 33
31 37 31 40 36 36
37 35 30 34 35 35
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 6. Beach Park Blvd S.O Egret St
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
206
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
38 31 30 35 31 34
33 40 34 36 40 35
31 39 39 32 39 38
34 31 33 39 38 30
30 37 31 40 32 33
39 37 35 39 34 30
31 32 34 30 33 37
40 30 36 39 37 30
30 30 30 30 31 37
34 36 40 40 32 36
35 37 38 35 36 32
37 39 34 33 30 32
32 34 36 38 31 38
40 39 36 31 35 35
39 35 36 30 37 31
33 32 40 40 38 31
36 36 30 36 31 33
37 31 32 33 30 31
34 32 34 30 36 39
30 40 34 32 31 32
34 39 39 32 38 30
36 33 40 30 37 34
32 36 30 38 31 31
37 39 30 35 34 36
39 30 37 36 37 35
37 34 31 32 38 34
38 35 32 30 33 39
30 36 30 36 32 38
30 36 37 32 30 40
33 40 37 34 37 35
35 37 40 40 38 38
34 33 39 34 31 32
37 33 30 30 34 31
34 37 36 39 35 33
31 40 31 34 30 37
32 37 30 33 32 32
30 40 30 40 37 33
30 33 37 36 32 34
38 38 37 40 31 38
36 31 36 34 30 33
35 35 30 34 38 38
38 30 34 38 40 37
34 40 35 34 31 32
38 32 32 31 36 33
31 31 30 31 30 30
35 37 33 33 31 36
30 38 38 40 30 34
30 34 39 32 32 30
37 38 37 36 30 40
39 30 31 36 39 35
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 6B. Beach Park Blvd S.O Swordfish St
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
207
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
34 31 30 29 26 29
28 35 28 28 32 30
33 30 34 28 31 34
26 35 29 29 29 30
30 32 29 34 32 26
32 35 25 29 31 31
28 33 28 32 29 31
34 31 33 32 35 25
34 30 33 35 32 26
26 33 33 25 32 26
25 25 30 35 33 35
25 35 25 29 31 32
32 34 31 26 30 35
34 33 27 35 34 33
31 26 33 25 28 25
32 29 30 26 26 25
29 28 28 27 33 26
30 33 32 27 29 29
31 32 30 30 26 32
29 26 25 27 31 35
26 29 25 31 27 28
27 26 32 33 34 28
25 28 34 32 34 29
28 30 32 26 34 32
31 30 33 34 30 30
26 25 35 35 33 30
27 27 34 28 33 25
30 25 32 27 30 35
34 25 31 26 31 30
33 26 29 32 26 28
26 34 34 35 25 33
34 26 27 31 29 25
35 26 25 25 31 34
29 31 34 26 25 27
35 29 25 26 34 33
35 27 32 30 35 29
30 27 32 34 29 34
26 34 26 27 26 26
27 29 28 26 25 29
30 27 25 34 27 27
26 28 34 25 35 30
26 28 35 29 31 34
30 25 33 28 34 26
28 25 34 25 34 27
27 26 25 32 31 32
35 25 32 33 27 27
30 27 31 28 26 30
26 33 25 28 31 27
35 34 29 29 35 31
29 34 25 25 25 25
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 7. Boothbay Ave S.O Galveston St
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
208
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
29 29 25 28 34 26
33 30 35 32 33 26
28 35 33 28 34 29
35 25 28 27 26 28
32 30 30 34 28 26
30 26 25 34 32 25
28 28 32 32 32 26
32 28 27 34 29 33
30 31 31 29 34 27
29 33 27 29 32 35
27 32 30 31 31 25
35 25 32 26 30 33
25 26 28 32 25 28
30 32 26 32 25 25
25 32 27 34 29 25
27 31 25 29 29 27
26 34 33 27 34 32
31 28 34 31 29 26
32 33 28 31 25 30
32 27 32 34 28 35
28 26 32 26 33 25
35 29 28 27 29 27
31 29 33 27 27 26
27 35 32 27 28 30
32 31 31 27 35 29
30 26 28 28 30 35
30 35 28 29 35 34
34 26 25 26 34 27
26 30 27 30 30 33
33 35 34 31 26 25
31 35 32 33 33 27
30 35 26 31 27 27
33 28 32 29 25 32
25 28 28 29 30 25
32 26 30 32 32 31
27 31 28 27 30 26
25 31 31 27 34 28
25 25 29 31 32 35
26 25 31 30 26 33
27 28 25 33 32 34
25 29 29 30 32 27
35 35 29 28 30 26
35 31 35 29 26 29
32 27 25 28 26 32
27 31 30 30 26 30
34 32 32 33 33 33
34 31 34 35 26 30
28 28 26 26 25 27
26 25 35 27 26 30
33 29 26 27 35 31
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 8. Bounty Dr E.O Shell Blvd
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
209
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
27 29 26 28 27 25
26 30 35 34 27 26
29 34 29 30 27 32
29 34 30 32 33 33
28 32 35 28 31 31
28 35 26 30 32 34
32 34 33 29 30 30
35 28 30 28 34 31
30 27 29 35 31 32
27 26 30 31 25 27
26 30 31 35 27 25
25 31 26 28 27 25
34 32 35 28 35 25
32 26 31 33 28 27
25 30 33 35 33 29
28 34 34 25 32 29
31 30 35 27 28 27
29 27 27 27 28 33
28 33 29 33 25 32
30 26 26 26 26 34
31 33 31 32 26 27
32 34 33 27 34 31
25 28 35 27 31 29
34 34 32 33 32 35
26 30 30 27 32 29
29 27 29 29 31 29
29 30 32 29 32 35
32 26 25 30 35 25
31 29 34 29 29 26
29 33 34 32 33 34
33 30 35 29 28 29
35 25 30 34 29 29
31 30 26 26 31 25
34 27 35 25 25 31
33 25 34 29 30 26
25 35 30 34 34 28
27 30 32 33 29 25
34 30 29 31 34 25
32 32 25 27 31 32
30 32 30 27 32 30
30 25 32 33 27 30
29 25 31 35 31 27
25 25 28 35 29 30
27 27 29 28 31 30
30 30 27 35 30 27
35 28 35 29 28 26
34 32 26 27 35 29
28 33 34 35 35 30
35 35 26 33 28 28
30 34 30 30 34 29
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 9. Catamaran St N.O Balboa St
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
210
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
29 32 32 26 26 34
27 25 30 34 25 34
33 34 33 29 27 27
30 34 29 27 33 33
25 35 28 26 35 27
33 28 33 34 25 31
26 26 30 31 25 27
32 30 33 26 25 29
28 26 29 35 30 25
31 30 27 28 32 25
32 31 30 34 35 26
35 28 26 34 28 29
30 29 34 35 35 32
32 25 35 26 29 29
28 28 33 29 29 34
28 26 32 32 30 32
33 35 32 25 26 26
26 26 25 34 32 28
28 35 27 27 29 25
29 26 31 25 26 30
34 29 30 35 27 33
34 28 35 33 35 29
34 27 29 32 33 29
33 26 31 32 25 26
32 30 26 32 33 31
28 30 35 34 31 30
32 29 25 25 28 34
29 31 27 32 34 29
35 32 25 33 34 33
33 27 31 26 27 26
35 32 31 33 35 29
35 33 34 26 34 27
26 33 31 29 33 34
34 33 30 31 26 27
25 28 29 28 32 35
30 25 35 28 26 31
27 30 35 26 29 29
28 31 32 33 28 35
32 35 26 35 28 34
32 26 31 27 28 31
30 32 33 30 28 28
27 35 26 34 28 27
26 25 25 25 27 25
26 26 28 33 29 29
35 26 28 28 27 28
26 26 29 30 33 35
28 30 33 31 31 27
32 26 31 33 30 27
30 35 33 31 31 34
30 31 25 33 29 34
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 10. Catamaran St E.O Clipper Ln
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
211
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
35 35 31 30 35 28
31 34 26 31 26 35
27 35 34 29 30 32
29 26 26 25 34 31
30 32 29 30 35 32
32 26 28 28 33 25
33 34 28 29 28 31
31 25 31 33 26 28
27 28 28 29 26 25
32 26 26 30 25 32
32 32 35 32 34 35
25 29 28 27 29 29
29 32 31 30 27 26
30 35 28 27 32 29
27 28 34 35 34 26
33 34 26 27 29 25
25 32 33 31 33 26
32 26 30 27 29 29
27 31 32 31 34 27
35 30 30 31 32 26
30 30 28 26 30 30
26 35 25 34 34 35
29 34 30 35 28 32
32 31 25 31 25 33
25 31 29 31 25 30
27 28 32 32 28 28
30 31 31 28 30 28
27 33 28 29 33 32
28 27 29 25 33 30
26 26 32 31 33 30
26 33 34 35 31 27
26 31 26 26 27 27
34 31 34 32 29 28
34 25 28 29 27 31
27 29 29 34 30 30
25 35 35 31 27 33
35 27 26 26 33 31
28 31 30 25 30 26
29 27 32 31 25 32
28 35 29 32 33 33
27 27 31 27 30 31
29 25 25 28 29 29
31 27 27 30 34 34
34 32 27 35 28 34
31 35 25 35 25 29
26 28 29 29 30 27
32 34 33 26 26 33
30 25 32 28 28 33
25 30 34 30 29 34
31 35 32 33 35 32
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 11. Chess Dr E.O Vintage Park Dr
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
212
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
42 46 48 43 44 43
49 47 41 46 42 47
48 48 44 40 43 47
44 46 44 49 50 42
42 45 45 43 45 45
48 50 49 47 44 49
46 45 40 45 49 50
50 46 49 46 44 47
50 48 41 40 48 47
46 48 40 50 40 43
49 46 44 50 42 44
43 41 41 43 40 49
50 40 48 45 41 50
50 44 47 45 47 40
50 40 41 42 48 45
43 44 47 40 49 41
44 42 49 49 48 40
47 49 45 46 44 41
40 50 44 43 50 45
43 46 47 50 44 50
44 49 41 40 47 46
48 45 45 50 45 50
43 50 45 48 50 41
40 41 47 42 49 41
49 49 50 44 41 50
40 48 45 43 43 49
45 50 41 47 50 41
46 48 46 46 46 50
40 44 40 45 40 45
41 40 40 48 48 50
46 40 42 45 48 50
42 41 45 45 48 47
41 50 48 50 47 48
50 46 50 49 41 46
41 48 43 40 48 50
45 44 44 48 46 49
43 47 42 42 40 47
50 44 45 41 40 48
42 41 41 40 41 50
43 42 41 40 48 47
40 41 42 47 41 48
41 48 41 48 45 42
44 48 43 40 43 50
42 42 45 41 41 43
40 45 48 46 50 40
49 41 49 42 44 46
47 48 42 45 44 50
43 40 49 48 46 40
40 43 40 49 49 43
43 41 49 40 48 44
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 12. E 3rd Ave E.O Lakeside Dr
Posted MPH: 45
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
213
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
38 40 45 38 39 45
39 45 41 39 35 35
38 42 41 43 37 40
41 37 37 40 43 45
45 39 45 36 37 37
42 43 44 38 37 44
35 39 37 45 41 41
43 39 35 37 39 37
36 37 40 45 41 37
40 36 42 39 43 45
40 43 42 39 36 43
44 36 36 36 35 35
42 40 42 44 35 45
45 42 44 35 36 39
41 42 35 38 37 41
44 42 40 41 40 44
38 36 38 45 45 35
43 41 45 38 41 38
45 39 38 43 42 44
42 39 45 41 41 39
36 40 42 42 45 44
39 41 35 43 41 39
44 35 36 41 40 38
41 43 40 40 42 42
36 36 36 37 36 45
35 43 36 35 39 42
44 37 36 43 42 40
42 40 35 45 39 38
40 44 41 44 39 40
44 40 40 45 41 43
45 35 35 41 42 42
39 45 45 45 36 39
45 37 43 41 43 45
37 44 45 35 35 42
43 42 42 45 40 37
37 40 40 40 37 43
38 40 39 42 39 37
41 44 43 43 44 42
36 40 38 44 41 40
37 44 44 39 38 43
40 40 36 41 42 36
45 43 43 37 41 45
38 43 45 43 43 40
39 36 40 44 39 38
42 43 43 43 44 42
41 42 37 37 44 39
41 41 38 39 41 36
39 43 36 40 39 44
40 42 36 43 42 42
38 44 43 41 43 39
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 13. E 3rd Ave W.O Lincoln Centre Dr
Posted MPH: 40
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
214
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
38 45 38 35 41 45
36 40 35 42 41 43
41 43 40 45 36 43
42 43 38 41 35 36
42 41 37 41 42 43
44 43 44 39 44 44
42 41 36 39 37 38
39 37 41 42 35 39
42 35 45 42 40 36
41 41 40 39 35 44
45 41 45 41 40 38
38 38 43 36 37 45
39 35 45 36 37 40
35 35 36 39 42 44
36 42 41 41 38 37
39 45 37 41 43 35
35 35 36 36 35 39
35 38 37 37 42 35
36 35 39 41 39 43
38 39 40 39 35 37
44 43 39 40 40 38
41 42 42 35 43 37
39 37 43 45 40 35
39 45 43 42 39 39
45 36 42 38 38 36
43 39 41 35 42 39
37 45 42 40 43 38
40 45 43 35 45 43
38 38 43 37 35 41
40 44 42 36 36 39
39 38 36 41 35 37
41 38 43 43 43 45
39 43 38 44 37 39
40 35 35 40 37 39
38 42 40 39 35 40
40 39 40 41 37 42
42 45 44 45 39 45
37 40 38 38 38 39
39 37 42 42 35 37
36 43 37 39 43 38
45 40 45 36 36 35
36 38 39 38 40 42
37 45 42 38 35 36
41 39 36 44 36 37
36 41 36 45 39 43
41 44 44 45 35 39
39 35 42 45 39 39
43 39 45 43 42 45
36 36 40 45 41 43
39 45 38 35 44 45
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 14. E Hillsdale Blvd W.O Sea Spray Ln
Posted MPH: 40
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
215
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
38 30 33 34 31 35
32 30 33 38 32 39
30 40 32 34 31 30
39 35 33 32 31 36
32 40 35 40 30 34
33 39 31 35 31 30
33 35 33 37 31 30
34 34 36 31 33 36
39 38 32 33 36 34
31 37 38 31 30 40
36 40 38 36 38 34
36 38 40 34 35 32
38 34 36 39 34 40
35 40 32 39 37 31
34 34 30 36 38 36
32 30 40 36 38 40
36 36 31 33 36 38
33 39 35 35 39 38
38 30 40 39 33 37
39 35 38 30 36 35
40 30 36 35 31 31
34 40 37 31 40 35
40 32 30 36 33 38
31 35 35 32 39 32
32 32 39 30 30 34
36 35 34 35 40 34
33 39 35 39 34 36
36 39 38 38 39 32
35 39 37 39 36 32
40 36 31 40 30 40
33 39 30 37 35 30
38 36 33 39 35 38
36 30 39 35 38 39
34 32 40 36 34 40
31 37 40 36 37 35
35 38 39 40 31 32
38 40 37 34 34 31
36 31 40 30 30 31
37 30 37 37 40 36
40 32 35 31 39 31
34 33 32 39 32 31
34 36 30 31 34 33
37 32 32 36 33 37
30 33 30 37 32 35
39 30 30 30 37 35
31 40 40 33 40 40
38 33 34 34 30 38
35 33 36 37 32 38
32 33 30 40 37 36
37 38 40 40 34 40
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 15. E Hillsdale Blvd E.O Portal Ln
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
216
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
30 35 36 37 40 38
38 32 32 34 37 30
31 30 37 40 32 31
38 35 40 40 36 37
39 40 35 35 31 33
32 35 32 39 34 31
39 38 34 35 40 32
30 32 39 35 30 35
30 37 30 35 32 40
39 40 31 40 40 38
32 33 36 39 35 37
40 38 35 40 35 35
32 31 31 32 30 32
32 35 38 35 39 39
36 32 39 36 38 32
37 35 35 37 36 39
37 34 37 39 39 40
39 38 40 37 34 36
39 33 31 36 35 32
40 33 32 38 37 32
37 31 39 39 30 38
39 33 38 38 32 32
40 39 35 39 34 36
32 34 33 33 36 38
40 33 38 40 36 32
36 34 38 32 31 31
36 32 38 36 31 32
37 36 32 37 37 39
39 39 33 36 37 40
36 33 34 36 31 30
40 31 39 37 37 30
37 32 33 34 34 38
31 31 36 40 33 36
40 35 30 32 35 31
37 40 40 38 36 35
40 32 36 37 35 33
31 35 36 36 40 38
39 33 30 36 30 32
38 39 37 38 32 30
39 33 34 33 38 32
30 40 33 37 30 36
37 36 39 38 34 37
30 39 39 31 30 32
35 38 34 32 34 38
30 32 30 38 35 32
32 34 37 39 38 31
32 39 33 37 35 30
35 40 40 39 30 36
34 30 31 30 39 31
39 31 32 38 36 31
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 16. E Hillsdale Blvd N.O Calypso Ln
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
217
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
40 38 35 38 36 40
41 35 43 41 38 39
35 39 40 39 36 44
40 42 43 37 38 43
36 43 35 39 36 43
39 45 42 41 37 41
45 38 39 45 38 36
35 38 39 44 35 35
42 45 36 36 38 36
42 43 35 38 45 43
45 43 43 44 37 45
37 40 37 41 43 43
37 42 44 44 40 39
44 44 37 39 38 42
45 36 40 43 44 36
42 35 36 42 40 36
43 40 38 38 38 36
38 36 43 36 35 38
35 40 43 37 41 45
42 44 37 39 41 38
44 45 45 45 35 36
37 45 44 40 37 41
42 41 38 43 38 38
44 41 42 38 39 44
36 45 38 45 42 38
35 43 45 37 38 38
36 40 43 39 43 37
35 36 41 45 36 42
39 43 39 35 37 37
35 36 39 41 43 45
38 40 39 37 37 35
40 42 38 40 41 36
40 45 38 37 41 35
42 43 39 40 40 43
44 41 41 35 43 44
37 40 44 44 44 39
36 41 36 40 39 39
37 38 38 37 37 38
41 43 36 41 41 35
44 45 38 39 38 45
45 45 36 40 45 39
35 43 44 39 43 45
45 45 36 43 43 35
38 39 41 38 45 42
43 42 36 41 35 44
43 41 43 37 37 44
43 44 45 42 41 44
36 44 40 37 38 44
37 41 44 38 35 44
45 36 39 45 37 35
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 17. Edgewater Blvd N.O Orion Ln
Posted MPH: 40
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
218
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
37 34 32 34 30 34
40 40 32 37 32 38
31 33 30 31 40 37
39 33 32 35 36 36
30 34 30 40 39 40
35 40 34 31 30 30
32 39 35 32 30 40
31 35 40 34 40 32
33 38 30 40 40 35
30 36 33 37 39 33
38 30 34 31 35 35
30 40 35 31 30 30
38 35 30 39 40 39
31 40 37 37 35 35
38 30 31 35 30 32
35 39 37 36 37 39
36 40 34 30 35 40
33 36 38 33 33 30
38 35 31 39 40 36
33 30 40 37 34 35
32 33 40 35 37 31
37 40 40 31 30 32
38 31 31 34 36 33
32 34 30 34 31 31
40 40 33 36 34 33
38 37 40 30 40 34
33 36 36 37 39 32
38 34 38 31 38 31
31 30 31 33 31 34
36 32 40 40 35 39
34 38 35 40 34 32
37 32 30 32 33 37
40 38 39 39 31 32
32 37 36 30 34 36
30 38 34 31 37 30
32 32 35 34 39 40
36 34 39 34 30 39
32 33 40 35 40 33
30 32 39 32 30 37
30 32 31 36 39 40
40 35 39 39 30 36
36 34 33 40 32 36
38 40 33 36 39 35
40 36 37 31 34 30
35 37 34 37 31 39
31 31 32 33 33 36
32 31 31 35 36 35
35 39 39 38 31 40
31 31 33 34 34 30
37 32 32 31 32 36
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 18. Edgewater Blvd N.O Boothbay Ave
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
219
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
20 21 22 20 23 29
21 27 25 27 20 21
28 22 22 22 25 25
23 20 22 21 20 25
21 21 22 28 20 28
29 20 21 22 27 30
25 22 27 29 20 28
22 27 21 28 26 20
27 22 23 27 25 26
22 23 29 30 28 20
27 28 24 30 30 26
22 20 23 20 29 29
23 27 26 30 28 28
22 28 29 21 25 26
29 23 20 28 25 24
30 24 29 23 29 30
27 21 25 24 25 29
23 21 24 22 23 30
24 25 24 23 20 25
23 28 21 24 29 24
29 21 27 25 30 23
26 22 24 22 21 25
27 21 21 20 27 24
25 25 27 21 22 22
28 23 27 20 21 23
27 26 27 27 28 29
23 22 28 28 21 21
25 29 30 26 22 29
29 28 20 27 30 27
30 27 20 27 28 30
23 26 28 21 27 27
20 28 29 21 30 21
25 29 26 28 26 28
29 26 30 22 27 29
30 29 21 28 23 23
30 27 26 23 28 27
22 30 23 28 26 23
28 28 29 21 26 22
28 23 20 23 21 21
27 21 26 29 27 20
28 21 20 24 28 22
28 25 28 25 26 29
29 20 29 24 26 23
20 21 26 26 22 28
28 25 21 21 26 29
28 23 22 27 20 22
26 21 20 20 24 22
27 28 28 27 26 29
23 21 28 27 21 25
27 24 24 21 30 29
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 19. Halsey Blvd N.O Burrows St
Posted MPH: 25
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
220
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
30 40 37 34 37 38
33 36 31 36 39 40
40 39 34 38 38 32
35 40 32 35 32 30
37 30 36 30 34 37
33 30 39 36 40 38
35 35 38 32 30 32
39 38 34 33 34 34
34 33 31 31 40 36
30 38 40 37 32 34
32 30 39 31 32 37
37 40 36 36 34 31
38 40 31 36 40 38
37 39 40 30 31 33
32 40 39 38 30 32
32 35 38 31 33 39
33 40 33 36 40 34
31 34 40 39 34 39
39 37 32 32 37 33
38 32 35 35 38 31
31 37 40 39 34 37
30 39 31 31 30 30
31 34 39 35 36 30
35 32 36 32 40 40
31 34 32 35 40 30
31 33 40 33 38 30
38 34 34 34 31 38
36 33 39 35 32 34
34 38 40 34 38 39
37 39 35 40 40 35
40 37 33 39 33 31
31 34 34 31 30 31
31 35 35 36 33 38
40 37 37 37 30 35
33 37 36 32 35 34
40 37 39 34 30 40
37 32 31 38 35 36
40 31 39 32 39 38
30 39 32 35 30 30
39 32 40 30 33 31
38 36 31 35 33 38
31 31 39 34 32 35
39 30 34 33 37 39
35 30 38 40 39 31
33 37 35 30 37 31
39 33 36 30 37 33
31 34 32 33 40 33
37 38 37 36 33 34
40 38 32 30 32 30
40 39 39 30 36 40
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 20. Foster City Blvd S.O Chess Dr
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
221
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
35 36 36 43 44 38
38 35 43 35 44 39
38 37 40 38 35 40
44 37 35 42 37 35
41 44 42 36 44 35
44 36 45 40 44 40
40 40 41 45 42 39
45 44 37 45 36 39
37 36 44 37 37 41
40 42 39 43 37 36
36 36 44 39 36 36
41 45 38 42 45 40
42 38 37 35 39 40
39 42 45 40 44 38
42 36 36 43 42 38
40 42 35 42 38 45
43 44 38 38 36 35
41 36 40 39 38 43
38 37 45 38 41 35
39 39 37 43 39 43
37 44 35 39 36 39
40 40 40 39 42 40
44 40 36 44 35 43
41 36 37 38 42 35
45 43 40 39 36 38
36 35 36 40 37 43
43 37 38 44 37 36
41 35 35 45 43 44
43 42 37 40 36 35
38 40 36 38 43 43
45 35 35 39 35 36
40 37 36 39 37 36
41 41 36 38 35 45
37 40 37 40 41 41
35 36 35 41 37 38
43 41 44 38 37 42
37 44 37 38 41 39
36 36 36 41 36 44
42 37 43 44 36 38
39 43 36 36 42 37
44 40 36 37 38 39
39 44 35 43 43 45
38 37 44 39 39 44
45 41 44 36 35 38
36 35 39 39 45 35
45 38 38 35 42 45
36 44 40 36 38 41
39 44 43 36 44 43
41 38 42 37 38 37
40 38 39 41 37 37
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 21. Foster City Blvd S.O Civic Center Dr
Posted MPH: 40
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
222
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
37 32 40 34 30 34
33 33 31 36 37 34
34 35 35 37 31 37
31 34 35 34 31 35
30 34 38 35 40 37
38 38 36 33 38 39
30 32 34 35 36 30
32 37 31 39 31 38
35 40 38 40 35 37
32 30 32 40 31 31
31 34 38 30 39 40
40 31 30 35 35 34
34 40 35 40 36 32
32 35 30 40 30 31
32 36 33 39 35 38
30 40 32 39 33 34
34 35 40 39 38 32
39 37 30 33 36 39
39 32 31 36 37 37
38 33 34 33 30 36
34 40 40 36 36 40
31 31 33 32 31 32
36 33 32 39 36 33
39 38 39 40 40 39
30 40 36 31 34 35
34 32 37 37 36 40
40 38 40 40 30 32
39 36 31 31 34 31
39 30 38 35 36 39
34 30 34 34 33 32
35 32 36 34 32 33
40 35 38 32 38 35
31 33 34 33 30 38
40 37 40 32 40 35
40 33 40 36 38 36
38 31 37 37 35 32
40 32 31 39 31 32
36 38 33 31 33 38
30 31 36 37 30 36
37 40 38 35 35 30
32 33 37 30 37 33
35 33 31 31 36 40
36 34 35 35 32 40
33 39 36 35 38 33
36 35 35 34 33 30
36 34 36 33 37 33
36 40 35 30 39 34
30 38 30 34 35 39
32 32 39 32 30 33
39 39 39 33 37 38
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 22. Foster City Blvd S.O Marlin Ave
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
223
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
26 35 32 27 30 32
27 31 25 29 29 32
26 29 35 25 35 26
30 35 31 27 35 25
27 32 31 34 34 25
28 33 29 26 26 27
32 31 28 28 35 27
27 26 27 28 34 32
26 35 34 26 29 28
35 27 29 34 30 28
30 27 34 31 31 35
27 25 34 34 34 28
30 34 26 34 27 30
30 32 30 32 31 30
30 34 33 25 32 28
31 32 27 31 30 27
26 32 29 35 27 33
31 26 29 31 35 32
31 28 27 35 30 35
33 29 26 35 31 33
33 33 25 25 26 26
30 29 35 31 31 32
31 31 26 27 35 32
33 33 29 35 28 27
26 28 31 26 35 28
31 35 34 32 26 25
29 31 27 34 27 32
31 30 25 33 32 27
27 35 30 31 35 30
35 34 26 28 31 32
26 25 35 32 27 26
31 28 31 35 30 26
29 31 30 34 25 32
32 32 29 33 35 25
33 25 25 31 35 31
32 30 33 25 35 26
34 28 35 25 31 27
33 34 29 32 27 28
29 32 32 31 29 33
35 30 26 35 30 35
29 25 31 34 27 33
34 26 30 31 32 26
34 33 31 29 31 27
25 30 33 30 28 34
33 31 28 28 26 25
35 31 30 33 33 31
26 31 33 34 28 25
35 25 35 33 26 25
29 25 31 34 29 33
35 28 25 25 25 28
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 23. Gull Ave E.O Mallard St
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
224
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
29 32 25 32 30 32
29 26 28 28 33 35
26 29 33 28 31 26
34 33 33 32 28 28
32 29 27 31 32 35
28 31 35 32 32 28
31 28 30 31 28 34
32 32 33 28 30 27
29 32 28 32 34 34
32 27 30 27 31 26
30 25 27 35 33 34
29 27 32 28 28 27
30 31 29 28 31 26
30 31 34 35 27 35
27 26 28 31 29 32
27 29 25 35 32 27
33 34 27 26 29 30
26 33 32 25 30 26
31 32 32 30 34 34
25 34 31 30 28 25
30 30 27 27 32 34
30 30 34 32 31 28
30 34 25 33 33 30
34 29 26 33 33 31
29 28 28 27 25 34
26 33 30 27 28 31
25 27 33 32 35 32
35 26 34 27 35 31
32 26 26 29 30 33
34 25 25 29 34 34
33 31 30 32 26 31
34 31 33 28 34 26
28 32 25 25 26 35
35 27 33 32 34 31
28 25 33 30 29 25
27 27 35 34 31 33
27 35 27 27 25 31
28 31 33 31 30 30
29 25 26 27 31 28
35 35 35 28 34 31
33 26 34 34 28 32
33 35 30 28 26 32
34 26 32 34 31 31
26 34 25 34 27 28
29 29 30 34 31 30
26 35 35 27 29 32
26 25 30 34 30 25
30 34 30 27 30 30
26 35 26 25 25 29
29 32 28 27 27 27
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 24. Marlin Ave E.O Halibut St
Posted MPH: 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
225
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
35 36 38 35 30 40
40 34 35 30 35 40
35 40 39 30 34 35
37 39 34 34 37 32
40 35 40 32 32 30
37 33 33 30 34 38
39 40 36 34 36 32
36 36 33 32 32 34
30 32 34 38 35 32
30 36 34 35 39 35
31 33 33 33 37 35
32 36 33 35 34 33
36 35 36 33 37 35
32 33 31 40 36 35
34 30 31 34 38 33
40 33 30 37 39 36
36 34 39 34 39 37
38 40 36 37 40 39
31 40 35 35 32 32
38 39 39 31 35 33
33 35 39 35 30 36
30 34 39 32 40 36
38 35 32 33 37 30
31 32 38 31 35 36
31 30 34 32 38 36
30 31 37 30 38 36
32 33 34 35 30 34
30 34 38 35 30 34
39 34 39 35 31 39
39 39 39 37 31 35
37 38 31 30 32 38
35 38 30 36 31 40
31 34 30 37 33 40
37 31 37 31 34 34
31 37 32 34 30 38
31 33 39 38 33 34
30 39 39 38 40 32
33 36 38 31 40 39
31 37 34 35 30 36
40 37 34 30 39 30
31 39 39 37 35 34
32 40 33 32 38 34
33 35 36 33 37 30
35 34 30 39 37 33
39 32 33 33 32 38
32 30 36 35 30 33
36 30 33 38 40 38
40 39 38 31 34 36
36 36 32 34 33 39
36 37 30 38 32 36
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 25. Metro Center Blvd E.O Vintage Park Dr
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
226
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
34 35 36 32 33 31
34 36 37 37 38 38
33 36 40 31 38 38
34 30 32 30 38 30
36 32 40 37 34 34
40 36 32 38 38 37
32 33 32 33 31 35
36 34 38 34 35 34
35 37 39 30 30 36
30 39 34 30 33 38
32 37 32 31 39 37
35 35 34 30 35 31
39 38 34 39 37 40
39 30 33 39 39 40
32 38 34 32 40 40
38 35 32 33 33 33
34 32 36 39 40 31
34 37 30 37 38 35
35 31 36 35 38 34
35 39 31 31 34 38
30 30 38 33 30 37
33 35 40 31 38 35
34 31 31 34 36 38
35 40 34 31 34 33
31 36 36 39 37 40
30 33 30 33 30 30
37 38 36 30 30 34
34 32 38 39 34 40
40 39 36 31 37 33
37 32 36 36 39 33
40 34 34 32 33 34
34 40 31 33 34 32
30 30 37 31 36 40
39 36 38 37 33 31
33 33 37 36 36 39
34 40 30 38 38 39
36 33 40 32 30 40
31 39 36 39 30 32
39 40 35 40 34 39
34 37 38 34 39 40
32 38 37 35 31 37
35 33 35 31 30 30
33 36 38 40 36 35
31 34 40 33 30 33
32 34 34 37 35 31
33 39 35 38 30 31
33 40 36 31 35 40
39 33 39 32 37 40
30 30 37 34 31 35
39 35 35 40 35 33
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 26. Pitcairn Dr W.O Santa Catalina Ln
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
227
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
23 25 21 28 25 22
23 23 24 30 27 22
29 28 27 27 27 24
21 30 27 20 22 22
24 20 26 20 25 24
20 25 20 23 21 25
26 24 22 28 25 20
27 24 21 20 20 30
20 22 23 20 23 30
25 22 20 25 30 29
25 30 26 27 24 29
20 22 29 26 23 24
25 27 29 21 20 26
22 24 28 22 22 22
24 23 30 30 24 29
27 21 26 26 25 30
29 21 26 20 22 26
21 21 27 21 20 25
26 27 30 24 24 29
28 20 20 25 26 20
26 21 26 21 30 28
20 20 29 28 27 29
28 23 20 24 29 30
29 30 30 28 24 24
20 27 22 24 26 22
27 30 23 24 27 25
23 23 21 23 20 26
20 23 30 21 30 27
30 29 26 30 22 22
21 29 20 30 25 23
20 29 25 20 24 25
30 22 30 30 21 24
24 25 23 20 28 22
22 24 25 30 27 29
22 27 22 21 28 20
28 25 22 22 25 21
24 24 20 20 30 27
27 27 23 22 29 20
26 20 24 27 22 28
22 27 22 23 27 25
24 29 22 22 21 28
30 26 26 21 29 29
23 26 22 24 29 24
30 30 25 24 27 20
26 30 30 28 20 21
28 27 22 22 24 28
27 30 28 29 22 25
29 23 20 29 23 29
30 26 21 30 27 25
25 20 30 20 27 23
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 27. Polaris Ave S.O Argus Ct
Posted MPH: 25
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
228
Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt
ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϬ Ϯϳ ϯϮ Ϯϲ
Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϮ
ϯϯ ϯϮ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϬ Ϯϲ
ϯϬ Ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϮ
ϯϯ Ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϮ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ
ϯϰ Ϯϴ Ϯϴ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϬ
ϯϰ Ϯϳ Ϯϱ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ ϯϮ
ϯϮ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ
ϯϰ Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϰ Ϯϵ ϯϬ
Ϯϴ ϯϱ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϴ
ϯϰ Ϯϴ ϯϯ Ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϭ
ϯϭ ϯϮ Ϯϴ ϯϯ Ϯϲ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ ϯϰ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ Ϯϲ Ϯϴ
ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϯ Ϯϱ
ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϯ Ϯϳ
ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϱ Ϯϵ ϯϯ Ϯϴ
ϯϰ ϯϱ Ϯϳ Ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϯ
Ϯϵ ϯϰ ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϱ ϯϯ
Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϭ
Ϯϱ Ϯϱ Ϯϵ ϯϯ Ϯϵ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϲ
Ϯϳ ϯϬ ϯϬ Ϯϲ Ϯϴ ϯϮ
ϯϭ ϯϱ Ϯϱ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ
Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϯ Ϯϵ ϯϱ Ϯϴ
ϯϮ ϯϯ ϯϭ Ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ Ϯϵ Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϱ ϯϯ
ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϲ ϯϰ ϯϮ
ϯϰ ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϵ
ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϵ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ ϯϰ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ ϯϯ Ϯϴ
ϯϮ Ϯϴ ϯϮ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ ϯϱ
ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϯ
Ϯϲ ϯϱ Ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϯ
ϯϯ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϮ
Ϯϳ Ϯϱ Ϯϳ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϬ
ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϭ
ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϰ
Ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϱ ϯϬ
Ϯϳ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϳ ϯϭ
ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϮ
ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϭ Ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϴ
Ϯϲ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϱ Ϯϱ Ϯϵ
Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϲ Ϯϴ
Ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϬ ϯϰ Ϯϱ
ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϱ
ϯϯ ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϯ Ϯϵ
Ϯϳ ϯϮ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ Ϯϲ
ϯϱ Ϯϲ ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϬ
Ϯϲ ϯϭ Ϯϲ ϯϰ ϯϮ Ϯϳ
/Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE
^/d
͗Ϯϴ͘WŽůLJŶĞƐŝĂƌ
͘KŚƌLJƐŽƉŽůŝƐƌ
WŽƐƚĞĚDW,͗ϯϬ
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
229
Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt
ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϴ Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϰ
Ϯϳ Ϯϲ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϱ Ϯϲ
Ϯϲ ϯϭ Ϯϴ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϱ
ϯϰ ϯϭ Ϯϳ ϯϰ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ
ϯϰ Ϯϲ ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϳ
Ϯϲ Ϯϵ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϵ
ϯϭ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϱ
ϯϯ ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϴ Ϯϴ ϯϱ
ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϵ Ϯϴ Ϯϵ ϯϬ
Ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϱ ϯϯ Ϯϴ ϯϮ
Ϯϵ Ϯϲ ϯϰ Ϯϳ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ
ϯϬ Ϯϲ ϯϯ Ϯϳ ϯϯ ϯϬ
ϯϰ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϱ
Ϯϳ ϯϱ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϮ Ϯϴ
Ϯϱ ϯϯ ϯϮ Ϯϱ Ϯϱ ϯϮ
Ϯϳ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϮ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ
ϯϯ Ϯϵ ϯϯ Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϯ
ϯϯ Ϯϱ ϯϯ ϯϭ Ϯϴ Ϯϴ
ϯϬ ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϯ Ϯϲ Ϯϱ
ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϬ ϯϱ
Ϯϲ Ϯϲ ϯϰ Ϯϳ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ
ϯϱ ϯϰ Ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϯ ϯϰ
ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϬ
ϯϭ ϯϭ Ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϬ Ϯϳ
Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϭ Ϯϳ ϯϭ
Ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϯ Ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϰ
Ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϲ
Ϯϵ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϭ Ϯϲ
ϯϬ ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϯ
Ϯϴ ϯϰ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ ϯϭ ϯϯ
ϯϬ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ
Ϯϵ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϯ Ϯϴ
Ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϯ Ϯϲ
ϯϬ Ϯϵ ϯϬ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϰ
ϯϯ Ϯϳ Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϮ Ϯϱ
ϯϭ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϭ
Ϯϵ Ϯϲ ϯϭ Ϯϵ ϯϬ ϯϰ
Ϯϱ ϯϯ Ϯϲ ϯϯ ϯϭ Ϯϳ
Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϯ Ϯϵ ϯϱ
ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϱ Ϯϱ
ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϰ Ϯϳ
ϯϱ Ϯϲ ϯϱ Ϯϱ Ϯϳ Ϯϲ
ϯϯ Ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϯ Ϯϴ
Ϯϲ ϯϮ ϯϯ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ ϯϰ
ϯϬ Ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϬ Ϯϵ Ϯϴ
Ϯϴ Ϯϱ Ϯϵ ϯϮ Ϯϳ ϯϭ
ϯϱ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϬ
ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ
ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϬ
Ϯϲ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϬ
/Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE
^/d
͗Ϯϵ͘WŽƌƚZŽLJĂůǀĞE͘K:ĂŵĂŝĐĂ^ƚ
WŽƐƚĞĚDW,͗ϯϬ
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
230
Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt
ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϵ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϴ
ϯϭ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϴ ϯϴ
ϯϴ ϯϮ ϰϬ ϯϳ ϯϵ ϰϬ
ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϵ
ϯϮ ϯϲ ϯϯ ϰϬ ϯϯ ϯϳ
ϯϵ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϵ ϰϬ ϰϬ
ϯϱ ϰϬ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϮ
ϯϯ ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϳ ϯϮ ϯϭ
ϯϵ ϰϬ ϯϵ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϳ
ϯϳ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϯϯ ϯϲ ϯϰ
ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϬ ϰϬ
ϯϳ ϯϳ ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϯ ϯϳ
ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϯ ϰϬ ϯϴ ϯϭ
ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϰ ϯϴ
ϯϯ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϰ
ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϬ ϯϲ ϯϬ
ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϳ ϯϭ ϯϱ
ϯϱ ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϳ
ϯϭ ϯϴ ϰϬ ϯϲ ϰϬ ϰϬ
ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϱ ϯϳ ϯϴ ϰϬ
ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϯ
ϯϬ ϯϭ ϯϯ ϯϴ ϯϵ ϯϴ
ϯϮ ϯϳ ϯϲ ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϯ
ϯϮ ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϰϬ ϯϴ
ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϱ
ϯϮ ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϱ ϯϲ ϯϯ
ϯϴ ϰϬ ϯϰ ϰϬ ϯϯ ϯϲ
ϯϵ ϯϱ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϵ
ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϱ ϯϳ
ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϭ ϰϬ ϯϳ ϯϰ
ϯϳ ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϵ ϯϭ
ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϲ ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϱ
ϰϬ ϯϱ ϯϮ ϰϬ ϯϬ ϯϴ
ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϲ ϯϲ ϯϭ
ϯϯ ϰϬ ϯϮ ϯϲ ϯϬ ϰϬ
ϯϳ ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϵ
ϯϳ ϯϲ ϯϬ ϰϬ ϯϭ ϯϲ
ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϮ ϯϵ ϰϬ ϯϮ
ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϲ
ϯϵ ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϮ
ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϬ
ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϮ
ϯϭ ϯϲ ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϲ ϰϬ
ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϵ ϯϲ ϯϵ
ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϲ ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϱ
ϯϰ ϯϯ ϯϳ ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϭ
ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϬ
ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϯ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϰϬ
ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϬ ϯϱ ϯϯ
ϯϯ ϯϬ ϯϯ ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϲ
/Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE
^/d
͗ϯϬ͘^ŚĞůůůǀĚ^͘K
ŽƵƌƚ>Ŷ
WŽƐƚĞĚDW,͗ϯϱ
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
231
NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB
37 38 38 34 39 34
30 33 36 31 37 36
36 37 36 39 40 38
32 30 33 32 34 33
34 38 33 34 33 39
32 40 39 34 40 30
30 32 38 34 37 38
40 33 34 40 33 38
33 35 40 36 33 36
32 36 39 38 31 39
31 38 38 33 38 38
39 34 40 31 32 36
30 37 31 38 30 35
35 31 37 33 33 32
31 32 36 40 38 36
32 38 30 33 30 31
40 39 30 31 38 32
39 36 39 35 32 31
40 35 39 40 40 34
31 35 40 33 35 35
31 39 36 33 34 40
37 40 39 36 36 38
40 32 33 39 31 39
36 38 39 30 30 36
40 40 38 35 31 36
34 32 32 36 30 33
35 40 31 30 32 35
32 31 37 36 34 31
37 39 33 30 37 38
31 40 31 38 37 32
35 39 39 40 34 30
31 33 34 36 32 40
30 32 37 30 35 34
35 36 40 39 33 31
38 39 32 30 31 32
34 34 32 32 38 33
32 33 37 38 30 32
37 36 37 38 32 35
37 35 40 34 37 39
39 37 39 37 37 33
38 35 39 33 37 35
35 37 36 30 31 36
32 40 36 32 36 40
34 35 31 39 40 35
33 35 32 34 36 33
38 40 35 33 33 31
30 39 33 39 32 30
36 40 31 30 40 36
40 33 34 38 39 35
38 39 40 30 36 38
DIRECTION DIRECTION DIRECTION
SITE: 31. Shell Blvd N.O South Rd
Posted MPH: 35
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
232
Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt
ϯϳ ϰϬ ϯϭ ϯϲ ϯϴ ϯϬ
ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϬ ϰϬ ϯϵ
ϯϰ ϯϱ ϯϵ ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϳ
ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϵ ϯϵ
ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϵ ϰϬ ϯϬ ϯϰ
ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϴ ϯϵ
ϯϵ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϯ
ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϯ ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϯ
ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϴ
ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϳ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϱ
ϯϵ ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϰϬ ϰϬ
ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϰϬ ϯϳ ϯϵ
ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϭ ϯϯ ϯϳ
ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϰ ϯϬ ϯϲ ϯϬ
ϯϵ ϯϲ ϰϬ ϯϳ ϯϵ ϯϴ
ϯϵ ϯϵ ϯϵ ϯϴ ϯϯ ϰϬ
ϯϮ ϰϬ ϯϮ ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϴ
ϯϳ ϯϲ ϯϭ ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϴ
ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϳ ϯϬ ϯϲ
ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϴ ϰϬ ϯϯ
ϯϬ ϰϬ ϯϯ ϯϬ ϯϵ ϯϱ
ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϬ
ϯϮ ϯϵ ϯϰ ϰϬ ϯϯ ϯϴ
ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϴ ϯϯ ϰϬ ϯϯ
ϯϴ ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϴ ϯϳ
ϯϳ ϯϮ ϯϵ ϯϬ ϯϲ ϯϴ
ϯϮ ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϵ ϯϵ ϯϲ
ϯϯ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϭ ϯϳ ϯϯ
ϯϮ ϯϬ ϯϵ ϯϵ ϯϴ ϯϮ
ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϬ ϯϳ ϯϰ
ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϭ ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϯ
ϯϬ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϯϰ
ϯϵ ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϱ ϰϬ ϯϭ
ϯϰ ϯϰ ϯϲ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϯϱ
ϯϮ ϯϰ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϯϰ ϰϬ
ϯϲ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϴ
ϯϯ ϯϲ ϯϵ ϯϳ ϰϬ ϰϬ
ϯϬ ϯϴ ϯϴ ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϭ
ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϲ ϯϱ ϯϵ ϯϯ
ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϲ ϯϵ ϯϬ ϯϭ
ϯϵ ϯϯ ϯϲ ϰϬ ϯϲ ϯϳ
ϯϭ ϯϰ ϯϲ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϭ
ϯϯ ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϭ ϯϬ ϯϲ
ϯϬ ϯϳ ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϱ
ϯϰ ϯϯ ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϬ
ϯϳ ϯϲ ϯϴ ϯϳ ϯϯ ϯϴ
ϯϳ ϯϰ ϰϬ ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϳ
ϯϳ ϰϬ ϯϵ ϯϰ ϯϲ ϯϱ
ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϲ ϯϯ ϯϯ
ϰϬ ϯϲ ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϬ
/Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE
^/d
͗ϯϮ͘^ŚĞůůůǀĚ^͘KĂƚĂŵĂƌĂŶ^ƚ
WŽƐƚĞĚDW,͗ϯϱ
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
233
Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt Eͬ
^ͬt
Ϯϴ ϯϰ ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϵ
Ϯϵ Ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϯ
Ϯϲ ϯϯ ϯϬ Ϯϴ Ϯϲ Ϯϴ
ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϯ
Ϯϳ Ϯϲ Ϯϲ ϯϬ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ
ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϮ
ϯϮ Ϯϵ Ϯϲ ϯϬ ϯϯ ϯϯ
ϯϯ ϯϰ Ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϱ ϯϱ
ϯϬ Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϳ Ϯϵ ϯϯ
Ϯϵ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϰ
ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϯ ϯϮ Ϯϲ Ϯϱ
ϯϬ ϯϯ ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϵ Ϯϴ
Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϳ ϯϭ Ϯϳ ϯϬ
ϯϮ ϯϭ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ Ϯϳ
Ϯϵ ϯϯ Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϬ Ϯϴ
ϯϮ Ϯϲ Ϯϱ ϯϯ ϯϭ ϯϬ
Ϯϱ Ϯϲ ϯϯ Ϯϵ Ϯϵ ϯϯ
ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϮ Ϯϱ
ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϬ ϯϮ ϯϱ Ϯϳ
ϯϰ Ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϰ ϯϮ ϯϯ
Ϯϱ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϮ Ϯϱ ϯϬ
ϯϬ Ϯϴ Ϯϲ ϯϰ Ϯϱ ϯϭ
Ϯϱ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϰ Ϯϲ Ϯϲ
Ϯϳ Ϯϲ ϯϭ Ϯϳ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ
Ϯϱ Ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϰ
ϯϮ Ϯϳ Ϯϵ ϯϱ ϯϮ Ϯϴ
Ϯϳ ϯϬ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϱ
Ϯϲ Ϯϲ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϰ Ϯϵ
ϯϬ ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϳ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ
Ϯϵ Ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϰ ϯϮ Ϯϵ
ϯϮ Ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϳ ϯϭ
Ϯϱ ϯϱ Ϯϳ ϯϯ Ϯϳ ϯϯ
Ϯϵ Ϯϲ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϮ
ϯϯ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϰ Ϯϲ ϯϬ
ϯϮ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϰ Ϯϵ
Ϯϴ ϯϮ ϯϬ ϯϭ ϯϮ ϯϮ
Ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ ϯϰ
Ϯϵ Ϯϳ ϯϱ ϯϭ Ϯϵ Ϯϳ
ϯϮ ϯϱ ϯϭ ϯϰ Ϯϱ ϯϰ
Ϯϳ ϯϰ ϯϱ ϯϮ Ϯϲ Ϯϲ
Ϯϵ ϯϮ ϯϮ Ϯϲ ϯϭ Ϯϱ
Ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϬ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϱ
ϯϰ ϯϭ Ϯϴ Ϯϲ ϯϰ ϯϰ
ϯϬ ϯϬ Ϯϱ ϯϮ Ϯϳ Ϯϱ
ϯϱ ϯϬ Ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϱ ϯϯ
ϯϮ ϯϭ ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϱ
ϯϱ ϯϱ ϯϰ ϯϰ Ϯϲ ϯϭ
ϯϮ Ϯϵ Ϯϱ Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϱ
Ϯϳ Ϯϴ Ϯϵ ϯϭ ϯϭ ϯϭ
Ϯϳ ϯϱ Ϯϴ ϯϯ ϯϯ ϯϬ
/Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE /Z
d/KE
^/d
͗ϯϯ͘sŝŶƚĂŐĞWĂƌŬƌE͘KDĞƚƌŽĞŶƚĞƌůǀĚ
WŽƐƚĞĚDW,͗ϯϬ
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
234
Attachment 2
ADT Volume Data
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
235
Site Code: 1
1. Altair Ave E.O Polaris Ave
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 4 2 6
01:00 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 2 4 6
04:00 1 16 17
05:00 1 31 32
06:00 9 29 38
07:00 37 60 97
08:00 67 53 120
09:00 54 77 131
10:00 37 73 110
11:00 53 66 119
12:00 PM 74 63 137
01:00 61 54 115
02:00 50 68 118
03:00 52 80 132
04:00 51 148 199
05:00 53 153 206
06:00 54 123 177
07:00 41 56 97
08:00 28 52 80
09:00 30 22 52
10:00 9 11 20
11:00 10 4 14
Total 778 1245 2023
Percent 38.5% 61.5%
AM Peak - 08:00 09:00 - - - - - - 09:00
V o l .- 6 7 7 7------ 1 3 1
PM Peak - 12:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 74 153 - - - - - - 206
Grand Total 778 1245 2023
Percent 38.5% 61.5%
ADT ADT 2,023 AADT 2,023
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
236
Site Code: 2
2. Baffin St N.O Antigua Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 0 1
01:00 2 1 3
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 2 0 2
04:00 0 0 0
05:00 1 5 6
06:00 1 6 7
07:00 13 32 45
08:00 24 40 64
09:00 13 26 39
10:00 8 22 30
11:00 13 17 30
12:00 PM 17 21 38
01:00 25 20 45
02:00 18 19 37
03:00 24 14 38
04:00 26 19 45
05:00 37 22 59
06:00 34 18 52
07:00 18 18 36
08:00 16 8 24
09:00 5 5 10
10:00 7 1 8
11:00 4 2 6
Total 309 316 625
Percent 49.4% 50.6%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 2 4 4 0------ 6 4
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
V o l .- 3 7 2 2------ 5 9
Grand Total 309 316 625
Percent 49.4% 50.6%
ADT ADT 625 AADT 625
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
237
Site Code: 3
3. Balclutha Dr N.O Nina Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 1 2
01:00 1 0 1
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0
05:00 0 2 2
06:00 4 4 8
07:00 25 37 62
08:00 26 82 108
09:00 20 25 45
10:00 13 23 36
11:00 18 32 50
12:00 PM 33 24 57
01:00 33 18 51
02:00 40 65 105
03:00 32 31 63
04:00 23 17 40
05:00 42 32 74
06:00 24 25 49
07:00 22 14 36
08:00 11 7 18
09:00 12 2 14
10:00 6 4 10
11:00 1 0 1
Total 387 445 832
Percent 46.5% 53.5%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 2 6 8 2------ 1 0 8
PM Peak - 17:00 14:00 - - - - - - 14:00
V o l .- 4 2 6 5------ 1 0 5
Grand Total 387 445 832
Percent 46.5% 53.5%
ADT ADT 832 AADT 832
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
238
Site Code: 4
4. Beach Park Blvd N.O Vega Cir
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 2 3
01:00 0 1 1
02:00 1 0 1
03:00 3 2 5
04:00 4 0 4
05:00 13 3 16
06:00 21 4 25
07:00 75 15 90
08:00 112 37 149
09:00 55 24 79
10:00 46 28 74
11:00 54 34 88
12:00 PM 45 43 88
01:00 46 38 84
02:00 55 48 103
03:00 42 46 88
04:00 43 64 107
05:00 49 91 140
06:00 39 62 101
07:00 35 45 80
08:00 20 27 47
09:00 16 31 47
10:00 7 8 15
11:00 0 7 7
Total 782 660 1442
Percent 54.2% 45.8%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 112 37 - - - - - - 149
PM Peak - 14:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
V o l .- 5 5 9 1------ 1 4 0
Grand Total 782 660 1442
Percent 54.2% 45.8%
ADT ADT 1,442 AADT 1,442
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
239
Site Code: 5
5. Beach Park Blvd E.O Lord Ivelson Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 1 2 3
01:00 3 3 6
02:00 0 1 1
03:00 0 3 3
04:00 0 3 3
05:00 2 14 16
06:00 13 33 46
07:00 105 154 259
08:00 218 282 500
09:00 68 119 187
10:00 64 107 171
11:00 101 112 213
12:00 PM 258 251 509
01:00 141 146 287
02:00 133 128 261
03:00 198 153 351
04:00 185 149 334
05:00 285 218 503
06:00 239 162 401
07:00 164 104 268
08:00 92 67 159
09:00 56 42 98
10:00 26 23 49
11:00 18 4 22
Total 2370 2280 4650
Percent 51.0% 49.0%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 218 282 - - - - - - 500
PM Peak - 17:00 12:00 - - - - - - 12:00
Vol. - 285 251 - - - - - - 509
Grand Total 2370 2280 4650
Percent 51.0% 49.0%
ADT ADT 4,650 AADT 4,650
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
240
Site Code: 6
6. Beach Park Blvd S.O Egret St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu NB SB Total
12:00 AM 4 7 11
01:00 3 4 7
02:00 0 1 1
03:00 0 1 1
04:00 9 3 12
05:00 20 2 22
06:00 23 12 35
07:00 117 69 186
08:00 196 170 366
09:00 80 51 131
10:00 70 57 127
11:00 85 77 162
12:00 PM 136 192 328
01:00 99 94 193
02:00 86 104 190
03:00 105 96 201
04:00 79 127 206
05:00 99 161 260
06:00 108 139 247
07:00 109 111 220
08:00 58 76 134
09:00 56 48 104
10:00 17 26 43
11:00 12 19 31
Total 1571 1647 3218
Percent 48.8% 51.2%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 196 170 - - - - - - 366
PM Peak - 12:00 12:00 - - - - - - 12:00
Vol. - 136 192 - - - - - - 328
Grand Total 1571 1647 3218
Percent 48.8% 51.2%
ADT ADT 3,218 AADT 3,218
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
241
Site Code: 6B
6B. Beach Park Blvd S.O Swordfish St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 0 1
01:00 1 2 3
02:00 0 1 1
03:00 0 1 1
04:00 0 1 1
05:00 1 1 2
06:00 13 4 17
07:00 71 53 124
08:00 170 193 363
09:00 20 16 36
10:00 39 21 60
11:00 58 30 88
12:00 PM 170 210 380
01:00 73 44 117
02:00 62 52 114
03:00 70 69 139
04:00 88 51 139
05:00 174 89 263
06:00 82 45 127
07:00 59 25 84
08:00 39 21 60
09:00 20 16 36
10:00 11 8 19
11:00 7 3 10
Total 1229 956 2185
Percent 56.2% 43.8%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 170 193 - - - - - - 363
PM Peak - 17:00 12:00 - - - - - - 12:00
Vol. - 174 210 - - - - - - 380
Grand Total 1229 956 2185
Percent 56.2% 43.8%
ADT ADT 2,185 AADT 2,185
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
242
Site Code: 5
7. Boothbay Ave S.O Galveston St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 4 3 7
01:00 0 1 1
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0
04:00 3 2 5
05:00 3 0 3
06:00 12 4 16
07:00 44 11 55
08:00 42 28 70
09:00 32 24 56
10:00 27 20 47
11:00 22 31 53
12:00 PM 24 26 50
01:00 21 17 38
02:00 17 27 44
03:00 29 40 69
04:00 29 53 82
05:00 29 47 76
06:00 27 51 78
07:00 11 32 43
08:00 9 22 31
09:00 7 22 29
10:00 1 8 9
11:00 0 1 1
Total 393 470 863
Percent 45.5% 54.5%
AM Peak - 07:00 11:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 4 4 3 1------ 7 0
PM Peak - 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - 16:00
V o l .- 2 9 5 3------ 8 2
Grand Total 393 470 863
Percent 45.5% 54.5%
ADT ADT 863 AADT 863
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
243
Site Code: 8
8. Bounty Dr E.O Shell Blvd
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 10 4 14
01:00 3 3 6
02:00 3 0 3
03:00 3 0 3
04:00 3 2 5
05:00 2 3 5
06:00 10 12 22
07:00 67 39 106
08:00 88 65 153
09:00 61 43 104
10:00 47 39 86
11:00 65 43 108
12:00 PM 88 63 151
01:00 77 37 114
02:00 74 37 111
03:00 108 72 180
04:00 156 65 221
05:00 162 85 247
06:00 148 74 222
07:00 101 55 156
08:00 65 29 94
09:00 43 16 59
10:00 19 11 30
11:00 10 9 19
Total 1413 806 2219
Percent 63.7% 36.3%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 8 8 6 5------ 1 5 3
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 162 85 - - - - - - 247
Grand Total 1413 806 2219
Percent 63.7% 36.3%
ADT ADT 2,219 AADT 2,219
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
244
Site Code: 9
9. Catamaran St N.O Balboa St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 4 5
01:00 0 1 1
02:00 1 0 1
03:00 2 0 2
04:00 2 2 4
05:00 2 1 3
06:00 9 6 15
07:00 59 37 96
08:00 81 53 134
09:00 42 40 82
10:00 33 43 76
11:00 26 41 67
12:00 PM 52 60 112
01:00 31 52 83
02:00 34 38 72
03:00 58 54 112
04:00 47 64 111
05:00 84 110 194
06:00 66 82 148
07:00 43 64 107
08:00 21 36 57
09:00 10 24 34
10:00 1 11 12
11:00 2 1 3
Total 707 824 1531
Percent 46.2% 53.8%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 8 1 5 3------ 1 3 4
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 84 110 - - - - - - 194
Grand Total 707 824 1531
Percent 46.2% 53.8%
ADT ADT 1,531 AADT 1,531
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
245
Site Code: 10
10. Catamaran St E.O Clipper Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 11 8 19
01:00 3 3 6
02:00 2 1 3
03:00 3 1 4
04:00 4 4 8
05:00 3 12 15
06:00 12 44 56
07:00 79 131 210
08:00 94 181 275
09:00 83 112 195
10:00 61 96 157
11:00 78 109 187
12:00 PM 130 121 251
01:00 91 102 193
02:00 94 100 194
03:00 136 118 254
04:00 170 121 291
05:00 190 141 331
06:00 169 140 309
07:00 163 112 275
08:00 91 59 150
09:00 49 35 84
10:00 27 11 38
11:00 18 8 26
Total 1761 1770 3531
Percent 49.9% 50.1%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 94 181 - - - - - - 275
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 190 141 - - - - - - 331
Grand Total 1761 1770 3531
Percent 49.9% 50.1%
ADT ADT 3,531 AADT 3,531
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
246
Site Code: 11
11. Chess Dr E.O Vintage Park Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 11-Oct-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 25 6 31
01:00 9 2 11
02:00 19 5 24
03:00 7 9 16
04:00 13 49 62
05:00 31 88 119
06:00 73 149 222
07:00 165 262 427
08:00 201 446 647
09:00 265 451 716
10:00 339 310 649
11:00 447 280 727
12:00 PM 562 273 835
01:00 591 206 797
02:00 645 212 857
03:00 718 193 911
04:00 827 213 1040
05:00 821 213 1034
06:00 644 214 858
07:00 533 135 668
08:00 340 101 441
09:00 173 60 233
10:00 114 38 152
11:00 59 11 70
Total 7621 3926 11547
Percent 66.0% 34.0%
AM Peak - 11:00 09:00 - - - - - - 11:00
Vol. - 447 451 - - - - - - 727
PM Peak - 16:00 12:00 - - - - - - 16:00
Vol. - 827 273 - - - - - - 1040
Grand Total 7621 3926 11547
Percent 66.0% 34.0%
ADT ADT 11,547 AADT 11,547
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
247
Site Code: 12
12. E 3rd Ave E.O Lakeside Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu EB WB Total
12:00 AM 11 8 19
01:00 2 5 7
02:00 6 4 10
03:00 3 5 8
04:00 12 13 25
05:00 40 37 77
06:00 91 111 202
07:00 221 336 557
08:00 364 559 923
09:00 278 321 599
10:00 185 166 351
11:00 203 174 377
12:00 PM 203 149 352
01:00 226 167 393
02:00 300 221 521
03:00 449 229 678
04:00 550 297 847
05:00 679 300 979
06:00 360 189 549
07:00 173 117 290
08:00 94 79 173
09:00 83 64 147
10:00 48 41 89
11:00 29 25 54
Total 4610 3617 8227
Percent 56.0% 44.0%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 364 559 - - - - - - 923
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 679 300 - - - - - - 979
Grand Total 4610 3617 8227
Percent 56.0% 44.0%
ADT ADT 8,227 AADT 8,227
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
248
Site Code: 13
13. E 3rd Ave W.O Lincoln Centre Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu EB WB Total
12:00 AM 1 10 11
01:00 5 9 14
02:00 3 2 5
03:00 3 2 5
04:00 6 3 9
05:00 25 4 29
06:00 82 15 97
07:00 123 34 157
08:00 277 65 342
09:00 320 116 436
10:00 170 77 247
11:00 147 128 275
12:00 PM 119 119 238
01:00 117 124 241
02:00 105 149 254
03:00 100 195 295
04:00 86 238 324
05:00 83 295 378
06:00 56 145 201
07:00 55 107 162
08:00 26 42 68
09:00 44 58 102
10:00 37 49 86
11:00 31 38 69
Total 2021 2024 4045
Percent 50.0% 50.0%
AM Peak - 09:00 11:00 - - - - - - 09:00
Vol. - 320 128 - - - - - - 436
PM Peak - 12:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 119 295 - - - - - - 378
Grand Total 2021 2024 4045
Percent 50.0% 50.0%
ADT ADT 4,045 AADT 4,045
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
249
Site Code: 14
14. E Hillsdale Blvd W.O Sea Spray Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 73 28 101
01:00 32 34 66
02:00 19 21 40
03:00 19 13 32
04:00 46 12 58
05:00 96 21 117
06:00 199 9 208
07:00 564 11 575
08:00 1008 31 1039
09:00 873 42 915
10:00 708 49 757
11:00 764 122 886
12:00 PM 941 166 1107
01:00 805 299 1104
02:00 1092 501 1593
03:00 1349 692 2041
04:00 1532 737 2269
05:00 1530 660 2190
06:00 1392 541 1933
07:00 944 588 1532
08:00 708 496 1204
09:00 440 517 957
10:00 236 502 738
11:00 162 502 664
Total 15532 6594 22126
Percent 70.2% 29.8%
AM Peak - 08:00 11:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 1008 122 - - - - - - 1039
PM Peak - 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - 16:00
Vol. - 1532 737 - - - - - - 2269
Grand Total 15532 6594 22126
Percent 70.2% 29.8%
ADT ADT 22,126 AADT 22,126
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
250
Site Code: 15
15. E Hillsdale Blvd E.O Portal Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu EB WB Total
12:00 AM 32 52 84
01:00 24 28 52
02:00 19 19 38
03:00 11 15 26
04:00 32 26 58
05:00 68 55 123
06:00 250 122 372
07:00 619 362 981
08:00 852 646 1498
09:00 603 445 1048
10:00 524 415 939
11:00 548 535 1083
12:00 PM 619 570 1189
01:00 555 509 1064
02:00 601 665 1266
03:00 526 770 1296
04:00 652 885 1537
05:00 740 1022 1762
06:00 617 887 1504
07:00 513 605 1118
08:00 376 425 801
09:00 265 320 585
10:00 132 172 304
11:00 72 114 186
Total 9250 9664 18914
Percent 48.9% 51.1%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 852 646 - - - - - - 1498
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 740 1022 - - - - - - 1762
Grand Total 9250 9664 18914
Percent 48.9% 51.1%
ADT ADT 18,914 AADT 18,914
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
251
Site Code: 16
16. E Hillsdale Blvd N.O Calypso Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu NB SB Total
12:00 AM 23 11 34
01:00 12 9 21
02:00 3 2 5
03:00 9 10 19
04:00 10 26 36
05:00 13 59 72
06:00 57 134 191
07:00 276 429 705
08:00 571 731 1302
09:00 253 368 621
10:00 251 338 589
11:00 256 353 609
12:00 PM 464 449 913
01:00 324 336 660
02:00 463 411 874
03:00 411 463 874
04:00 457 367 824
05:00 490 459 949
06:00 413 326 739
07:00 361 230 591
08:00 251 142 393
09:00 169 124 293
10:00 91 48 139
11:00 56 25 81
Total 5684 5850 11534
Percent 49.3% 50.7%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 571 731 - - - - - - 1302
PM Peak - 17:00 15:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 490 463 - - - - - - 949
Grand Total 5684 5850 11534
Percent 49.3% 50.7%
ADT ADT 11,534 AADT 11,534
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
252
Site Code: 17
17. Edgewater Blvd N.O Orion Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 18 42 60
01:00 8 14 22
02:00 3 2 5
03:00 15 11 26
04:00 37 15 52
05:00 86 22 108
06:00 246 78 324
07:00 739 286 1025
08:00 892 532 1424
09:00 692 445 1137
10:00 571 450 1021
11:00 577 516 1093
12:00 PM 617 689 1306
01:00 606 590 1196
02:00 559 685 1244
03:00 594 797 1391
04:00 604 893 1497
05:00 746 1089 1835
06:00 570 999 1569
07:00 500 650 1150
08:00 272 502 774
09:00 181 313 494
10:00 90 164 254
11:00 28 95 123
Total 9251 9879 19130
Percent 48.4% 51.6%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 892 532 - - - - - - 1424
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 746 1089 - - - - - - 1835
Grand Total 9251 9879 19130
Percent 48.4% 51.6%
ADT ADT 19,130 AADT 19,130
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
253
Site Code: 18
18. Edgewater Blvd N.O Boothbay Ave
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 11 17 28
01:00 5 8 13
02:00 3 0 3
03:00 6 1 7
04:00 20 7 27
05:00 50 13 63
06:00 127 33 160
07:00 489 117 606
08:00 503 330 833
09:00 365 228 593
10:00 336 221 557
11:00 145 259 404
12:00 PM 2 319 321
01:00 0 246 246
02:00 2 322 324
03:00 4 448 452
04:00 3 462 465
05:00 7 739 746
06:00 1 435 436
07:00 1 240 241
08:00 0 108 108
09:00 0 52 52
10:00 0 88 88
11:00 0 43 43
Total 2080 4736 6816
Percent 30.5% 69.5%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 503 330 - - - - - - 833
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 7 739 - - - - - - 746
Grand Total 2080 4736 6816
Percent 30.5% 69.5%
ADT ADT 6,816 AADT 6,816
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
254
Site Code: 19
19. Halsey Blvd N.O Burrows St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 2 3
01:00 0 1 1
02:00 1 1 2
03:00 1 1 2
04:00 1 0 1
05:00 3 1 4
06:00 11 5 16
07:00 46 32 78
08:00 68 45 113
09:00 51 27 78
10:00 39 34 73
11:00 50 47 97
12:00 PM 63 50 113
01:00 44 61 105
02:00 50 52 102
03:00 47 47 94
04:00 52 58 110
05:00 44 65 109
06:00 47 61 108
07:00 35 39 74
08:00 21 37 58
09:00 12 22 34
10:00 1 12 13
11:00 2 7 9
Total 690 707 1397
Percent 49.4% 50.6%
AM Peak - 08:00 11:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 6 8 4 7------ 1 1 3
PM Peak - 12:00 17:00 - - - - - - 12:00
V o l .- 6 3 6 5------ 1 1 3
Grand Total 690 707 1397
Percent 49.4% 50.6%
ADT ADT 1,397 AADT 1,397
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
255
Site Code: 20
20. Foster City Blvd S.O Chess Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu NB SB Total
12:00 AM 47 50 97
01:00 39 23 62
02:00 25 33 58
03:00 45 21 66
04:00 94 27 121
05:00 230 74 304
06:00 501 181 682
07:00 1183 315 1498
08:00 1497 463 1960
09:00 1159 430 1589
10:00 930 389 1319
11:00 898 434 1332
12:00 PM 947 479 1426
01:00 834 525 1359
02:00 788 654 1442
03:00 893 778 1671
04:00 783 1004 1787
05:00 880 1116 1996
06:00 803 752 1555
07:00 672 442 1114
08:00 494 286 780
09:00 361 198 559
10:00 186 139 325
11:00 90 90 180
Total 14379 8903 23282
Percent 61.8% 38.2%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 1497 463 - - - - - - 1960
PM Peak - 12:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 947 1116 - - - - - - 1996
Grand Total 14379 8903 23282
Percent 61.8% 38.2%
ADT ADT 23,282 AADT 23,282
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
256
Site Code: 21
Foster City Blvd S.O Civic Center Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 11-Oct-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 23 48 71
01:00 13 31 44
02:00 10 18 28
03:00 13 4 17
04:00 45 29 74
05:00 113 41 154
06:00 275 120 395
07:00 739 316 1055
08:00 894 597 1491
09:00 646 421 1067
10:00 553 414 967
11:00 572 458 1030
12:00 PM 627 580 1207
01:00 577 577 1154
02:00 631 583 1214
03:00 627 741 1368
04:00 669 713 1382
05:00 603 871 1474
06:00 595 813 1408
07:00 471 643 1114
08:00 377 485 862
09:00 239 287 526
10:00 107 198 305
11:00 61 102 163
Total 9480 9090 18570
Percent 51.1% 48.9%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 894 597 - - - - - - 1491
PM Peak - 16:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 669 871 - - - - - - 1474
Grand Total 9480 9090 18570
Percent 51.1% 48.9%
ADT ADT 18,570 AADT 18,570
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
257
Site Code: 22
22. Foster City Blvd S.O Marlin Ave
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 10 11 21
01:00 8 5 13
02:00 6 6 12
03:00 0 0 0
04:00 4 2 6
05:00 19 2 21
06:00 49 18 67
07:00 173 68 241
08:00 287 113 400
09:00 150 81 231
10:00 94 65 159
11:00 109 84 193
12:00 PM 203 138 341
01:00 133 120 253
02:00 106 105 211
03:00 131 142 273
04:00 133 146 279
05:00 156 196 352
06:00 146 200 346
07:00 119 132 251
08:00 75 115 190
09:00 44 75 119
10:00 20 44 64
11:00 7 20 27
Total 2182 1888 4070
Percent 53.6% 46.4%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 287 113 - - - - - - 400
PM Peak - 12:00 18:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 203 200 - - - - - - 352
Grand Total 2182 1888 4070
Percent 53.6% 46.4%
ADT ADT 4,070 AADT 4,070
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
258
Site Code: 23
23. Gull Ave E.O Mallard St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu EB WB Total
12:00 AM 4 1 5
01:00 2 0 2
02:00 2 0 2
03:00 0 1 1
04:00 3 7 10
05:00 3 11 14
06:00 18 37 55
07:00 62 130 192
08:00 137 212 349
09:00 51 85 136
10:00 56 85 141
11:00 54 73 127
12:00 PM 105 117 222
01:00 68 76 144
02:00 124 106 230
03:00 109 139 248
04:00 124 101 225
05:00 116 81 197
06:00 112 79 191
07:00 103 45 148
08:00 63 31 94
09:00 43 23 66
10:00 22 11 33
11:00 15 3 18
Total 1396 1454 2850
Percent 49.0% 51.0%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 137 212 - - - - - - 349
PM Peak - 14:00 15:00 - - - - - - 15:00
Vol. - 124 139 - - - - - - 248
Grand Total 1396 1454 2850
Percent 49.0% 51.0%
ADT ADT 2,850 AADT 2,850
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
259
Site Code: 24
24. Marlin Ave E.O Halibut St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 9 5 14
01:00 1 2 3
02:00 1 1 2
03:00 4 4 8
04:00 2 3 5
05:00 3 21 24
06:00 31 43 74
07:00 131 176 307
08:00 196 252 448
09:00 89 136 225
10:00 99 108 207
11:00 91 117 208
12:00 PM 273 213 486
01:00 151 135 286
02:00 121 147 268
03:00 139 165 304
04:00 181 117 298
05:00 194 159 353
06:00 205 140 345
07:00 159 92 251
08:00 111 55 166
09:00 62 37 99
10:00 30 15 45
11:00 12 14 26
Total 2295 2157 4452
Percent 51.5% 48.5%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 196 252 - - - - - - 448
PM Peak - 12:00 12:00 - - - - - - 12:00
Vol. - 273 213 - - - - - - 486
Grand Total 2295 2157 4452
Percent 51.5% 48.5%
ADT ADT 4,452 AADT 4,452
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
260
Site Code: 25
25. Metro Center Blvd E.O Vintage Park D
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu EB WB Total
12:00 AM 10 15 25
01:00 3 6 9
02:00 18 13 31
03:00 5 6 11
04:00 11 21 32
05:00 28 52 80
06:00 53 109 162
07:00 79 249 328
08:00 160 471 631
09:00 234 519 753
10:00 262 491 753
11:00 300 601 901
12:00 PM 319 576 895
01:00 301 569 870
02:00 357 539 896
03:00 360 538 898
04:00 456 488 944
05:00 501 518 1019
06:00 376 453 829
07:00 251 413 664
08:00 115 300 415
09:00 60 100 160
10:00 41 53 94
11:00 13 37 50
Total 4313 7137 11450
Percent 37.7% 62.3%
AM Peak - 11:00 11:00 - - - - - - 11:00
Vol. - 300 601 - - - - - - 901
PM Peak - 17:00 12:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 501 576 - - - - - - 1019
Grand Total 4313 7137 11450
Percent 37.7% 62.3%
ADT ADT 11,450 AADT 11,450
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
261
Site Code: 26
26. Pitcairn Dr W.O Santa Catalina Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 6 2 8
01:00 1 0 1
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 0 3 3
04:00 0 6 6
05:00 1 6 7
06:00 8 22 30
07:00 27 105 132
08:00 94 124 218
09:00 55 88 143
10:00 63 73 136
11:00 67 68 135
12:00 PM 93 81 174
01:00 71 88 159
02:00 104 110 214
03:00 134 92 226
04:00 130 111 241
05:00 287 193 480
06:00 143 115 258
07:00 107 164 271
08:00 50 33 83
09:00 38 15 53
10:00 20 11 31
11:00 8 5 13
Total 1507 1515 3022
Percent 49.9% 50.1%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 94 124 - - - - - - 218
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 287 193 - - - - - - 480
Grand Total 1507 1515 3022
Percent 49.9% 50.1%
ADT ADT 3,022 AADT 3,022
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
262
Site Code: 27
27. Polaris Ave S.O Argus Ct
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 2 0 2
01:00 1 0 1
02:00 3 0 3
03:00 1 1 2
04:00 0 2 2
05:00 2 11 13
06:00 3 31 34
07:00 45 119 164
08:00 54 171 225
09:00 26 67 93
10:00 24 52 76
11:00 20 53 73
12:00 PM 59 79 138
01:00 32 44 76
02:00 63 62 125
03:00 57 80 137
04:00 88 58 146
05:00 106 84 190
06:00 106 72 178
07:00 73 43 116
08:00 50 39 89
09:00 18 27 45
10:00 12 36 48
11:00 6 2 8
Total 851 1133 1984
Percent 42.9% 57.1%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 54 171 - - - - - - 225
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 106 84 - - - - - - 190
Grand Total 851 1133 1984
Percent 42.9% 57.1%
ADT ADT 1,984 AADT 1,984
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
263
Site Code: 28
28. Polynesia Dr E.O Chrysopolis Dr
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed EB WB Total
12:00 AM 3 2 5
01:00 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0
03:00 0 2 2
04:00 1 1 2
05:00 1 3 4
06:00 7 13 20
07:00 86 72 158
08:00 107 125 232
09:00 25 32 57
10:00 25 18 43
11:00 33 25 58
12:00 PM 123 103 226
01:00 40 41 81
02:00 25 28 53
03:00 42 20 62
04:00 46 26 72
05:00 52 34 86
06:00 37 19 56
07:00 20 25 45
08:00 26 17 43
09:00 14 4 18
10:00 7 1 8
11:00 5 4 9
Total 725 615 1340
Percent 54.1% 45.9%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 107 125 - - - - - - 232
PM Peak - 12:00 12:00 - - - - - - 12:00
Vol. - 123 103 - - - - - - 226
Grand Total 725 615 1340
Percent 54.1% 45.9%
ADT ADT 1,340 AADT 1,340
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
264
Site Code: 29
29. Port Royal Ave N.O Jamaica St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 1 3 4
01:00 0 1 1
02:00 0 1 1
03:00 1 3 4
04:00 1 1 2
05:00 10 2 12
06:00 25 4 29
07:00 75 14 89
08:00 64 37 101
09:00 46 23 69
10:00 21 14 35
11:00 36 22 58
12:00 PM 35 40 75
01:00 38 38 76
02:00 38 38 76
03:00 31 32 63
04:00 35 54 89
05:00 46 62 108
06:00 30 48 78
07:00 33 43 76
08:00 11 26 37
09:00 12 17 29
10:00 4 13 17
11:00 4 4 8
Total 597 540 1137
Percent 52.5% 47.5%
AM Peak - 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
V o l .- 7 5 3 7------ 1 0 1
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
V o l .- 4 6 6 2------ 1 0 8
Grand Total 597 540 1137
Percent 52.5% 47.5%
ADT ADT 1,137 AADT 1,137
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
265
Site Code: 30
Shell Blvd S.O E Court Ln
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 11-Oct-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 4 11 15
01:00 2 11 13
02:00 3 4 7
03:00 6 3 9
04:00 15 9 24
05:00 25 23 48
06:00 43 45 88
07:00 118 93 211
08:00 207 142 349
09:00 190 173 363
10:00 177 195 372
11:00 195 213 408
12:00 PM 224 218 442
01:00 227 225 452
02:00 217 247 464
03:00 282 234 516
04:00 252 255 507
05:00 252 257 509
06:00 202 288 490
07:00 203 233 436
08:00 91 170 261
09:00 32 76 108
10:00 25 54 79
11:00 6 17 23
Total 2998 3196 6194
Percent 48.4% 51.6%
AM Peak - 08:00 11:00 - - - - - - 11:00
Vol. - 207 213 - - - - - - 408
PM Peak - 15:00 18:00 - - - - - - 15:00
Vol. - 282 288 - - - - - - 516
Grand Total 2998 3196 6194
Percent 48.4% 51.6%
ADT ADT 6,194 AADT 6,194
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
266
Site Code: 31
Shell Blvd N.O South Rd
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 11-Oct-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 11 37 48
01:00 4 11 15
02:00 4 6 10
03:00 4 6 10
04:00 20 9 29
05:00 51 5 56
06:00 132 37 169
07:00 347 128 475
08:00 611 255 866
09:00 420 237 657
10:00 287 195 482
11:00 287 255 542
12:00 PM 331 277 608
01:00 320 302 622
02:00 283 308 591
03:00 399 366 765
04:00 373 492 865
05:00 560 676 1236
06:00 374 555 929
07:00 257 416 673
08:00 191 279 470
09:00 73 193 266
10:00 36 97 133
11:00 22 49 71
Total 5397 5191 10588
Percent 51.0% 49.0%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 611 255 - - - - - - 866
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 560 676 - - - - - - 1236
Grand Total 5397 5191 10588
Percent 51.0% 49.0%
ADT ADT 10,588 AADT 10,588
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
267
Site Code: 32
32. Shell Blvd S.O Catamaran St
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 27-Sep-23
Time Wed NB SB Total
12:00 AM 4 4 8
01:00 1 3 4
02:00 1 2 3
03:00 4 2 6
04:00 3 2 5
05:00 8 2 10
06:00 22 12 34
07:00 87 68 155
08:00 182 112 294
09:00 129 72 201
10:00 108 80 188
11:00 103 96 199
12:00 PM 154 142 296
01:00 123 120 243
02:00 112 126 238
03:00 137 114 251
04:00 150 137 287
05:00 182 245 427
06:00 165 171 336
07:00 132 144 276
08:00 62 102 164
09:00 28 50 78
10:00 14 17 31
11:00 4 10 14
Total 1915 1833 3748
Percent 51.1% 48.9%
AM Peak - 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00
Vol. - 182 112 - - - - - - 294
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 182 245 - - - - - - 427
Grand Total 1915 1833 3748
Percent 51.1% 48.9%
ADT ADT 3,748 AADT 3,748
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
268
Site Code: 33
33. Vintage Park Dr N.O Metro Center Blv
All Traffic Data Services, LLC
www.alltrafficdata.net
Start 28-Sep-23
Time Thu NB SB Total
12:00 AM 6 14 20
01:00 5 8 13
02:00 6 13 19
03:00 4 7 11
04:00 14 25 39
05:00 37 58 95
06:00 67 109 176
07:00 109 264 373
08:00 198 510 708
09:00 233 447 680
10:00 214 433 647
11:00 252 569 821
12:00 PM 275 589 864
01:00 239 529 768
02:00 240 559 799
03:00 268 582 850
04:00 303 574 877
05:00 380 599 979
06:00 319 495 814
07:00 220 412 632
08:00 132 271 403
09:00 91 109 200
10:00 44 52 96
11:00 17 37 54
Total 3673 7265 10938
Percent 33.6% 66.4%
AM Peak - 11:00 11:00 - - - - - - 11:00
Vol. - 252 569 - - - - - - 821
PM Peak - 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - 17:00
Vol. - 380 599 - - - - - - 979
Grand Total 3673 7265 10938
Percent 33.6% 66.4%
ADT ADT 10,938 AADT 10,938
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
269
Attachment 3
E&TS Worksheets
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
270
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 1
Street: Altair Avenue
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.28 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Residential
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
1 SPEED DATA
25 mph
Eastbound
29 mph
Westbound
29 mph
29 mph
21 to 30 mph
93%
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic:
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
0.967
2,023
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.):
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
15 20 25 30 35
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 1
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
271
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 1
Street: Altair Avenue
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 1
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
272
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 2
Street: Baffin Street
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Cornwallis Lane
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.34 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Residential
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
39 mph
Westbound
38 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
91%
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.):
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Sight Distance:
Average Daily Traffic:
Collision Review Period:
625
n/a
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 2
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
273
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 2
Street: Baffin Street
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Cornwallis Lane
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 2
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
274
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 3
Street: Balclutha Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Flying Cloud Drive
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.42 mi.
2 Straight, flat
Adequate
Residential
Divided on the western portion, undivided for the remainder On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
1 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
25 to 34 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 832
Collision Review Period:
1.568
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.):
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 3
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
275
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 3
Street: Balclutha Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Flying Cloud Drive
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 3
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
276
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 4
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Polaris Avenue to Edgewater Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.71 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Education
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
25 mph
Eastbound
33 mph
Westbound
34 mph
33 mph
25 to 34 mph
93%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,442
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 4
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
277
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 4
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Polaris Avenue to Edgewater Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data and allowable 5 mph reduction, the 85th percentile speed rounds to a posted speed limit of 30 mph (i.e., 5 mph higher than the existing posted speed limit). However, it is recommended that the posted speed limit should remain unchanged due to the adjacent land uses (single family homes and elementary school) and the associated pedestrian activity.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 4
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
278
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 5
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
1.3 mi.
4 Curvilinear, rolling but no steep grades
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Education
Divided
On-street bike facilities on the western portion, no shoulder on the eastern portion None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III) on eastern portion and bike lane (Class II) on the western portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
6 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
38 mph
Westbound
39 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
92%
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
4,650
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.544
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Segment Length:
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 5
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
279
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 5
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 5
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
280
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 6a
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Marlin Avenue
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
1.13 mi.
Varies, 2 to 4
Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street bike facilities (both sides) and parking (west side) On-street, parallel (both sides in the north, west side in the south) Bike route (Class III) on the northern portion, bike lane (Class II) on the southern portion TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 6
2017 through 2021
3 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
92%
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.452
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 3,218
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Segment Length:
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 6a
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
281
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 6a
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Marlin Avenue
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 6a
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
282
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 6b
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Marlin Avenue to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.96 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Education, and Open Space
Undivided
On-street bike facilities (both sides) and parking (west side) On-street, parallel (one side, west only)
Bike lane (Class II)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 34
2017 through 2021
1 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
38 mph
Southbound
39 mph
38 mph
30 to 39 mph
92%Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.261
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 2,185
Collision Review Period:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 6b
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
283
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 6b
Street: Beach Park Boulevard
Segment: Marlin Avenue to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 6b
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
284
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 7
Street: Boothbay Avenue
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Port Royal Avenue
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.48 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
25 to 34 mph
92%
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 2.646
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 863
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 7
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
285
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 7
Street: Boothbay Avenue
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Port Royal Avenue
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 7
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
286
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 8
Street: Bounty Drive
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.29 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
33 mph
33 mph
25 to 34 mph
92%
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Average Daily Traffic: 2,219
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 8
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
287
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 8
Street: Bounty Drive
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 8
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
288
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 9
Street: Catamaran Street
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.65 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
4 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
92%
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 2.202
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,531
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Segment Length:
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 9
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
289
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 9
Street: Catamaran Street
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 9
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
290
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 10
Street: Catamaran Street
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Marlin Avenue
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.41 mi.
2 Straight, flat
Adequate
Residential
Undivided
On-street parking (one side, north only), shoulder 5+ feet (one side, south only) On-street, parallel (one side, north only)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
92%Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 3,531
Collision Review Period:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 10
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
291
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 10
Street: Catamaran Street
Segment: Shell Boulevard to Marlin Avenue
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 10
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
292
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 11
Street: Chess Drive
Segment: City Limits to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.27 mi.
Varies, 3 to 5
Straight, flat
Adequate
Commercial
Divided
None
None
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
33 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
25 to 34 mph
26 to 35 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 11,547
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.352
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 11
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
293
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 11
Street: Chess Drive
Segment: City Limits to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 11
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
294
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 12
Street: East Third Avenue
Segment: City Limits to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.96 mi.
4 Straight, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Office and Open Space
Divided
5+ feet on western portion on the north side, none on the remainder None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III) on the western portion only
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
4 SPEED DATA
45 mph
Eastbound
49 mph
Westbound
49 mph
49 mph
41 to 50 mph
88%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 8,227
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.278
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
35 40 45 50 55
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 12
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
295
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 12
Street: East Third Avenue
Segment: City Limits to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 12
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
296
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 13
Street: East Third Avenue
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Easterly Limit
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.57 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Office, Industrial, and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
1 SPEED DATA
40 mph
Eastbound
44 mph
Westbound
44 mph
44 mph
36 to 45 mph
94%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 4,045
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.238
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35 40 45 50
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 13
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
297
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 13
Street: East Third Avenue
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Easterly Limit
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 13
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
298
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 14
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: City Limits to Edgewater Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.64 mi.
6 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Residential
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides)
None
Bike lane (Class II)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
13 SPEED DATA
40 mph
Eastbound
43 mph
Westbound
44 mph
43 mph
35 to 44 mph
90%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 22,126
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.503
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35 40 45 50
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 14
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
299
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 14
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: City Limits to Edgewater Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 14
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
300
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 15
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.67 mi.
Varies, 4 to 6
Straight, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides)
None
Bike lane (Class II)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
19 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
39 mph
Westbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
90%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 18,914
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.822
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 15
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
301
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 15
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 15
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
302
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 16
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Gull Avenue
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.61 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Industrial, and Office
TWLTL on the eastern portion, divided on the remainder
5+ feet and on-street bike facilities on the western portion, no shoulder on the eastern portion On-street, parallel (both sides) on the south side of the western portion only Shared-road/bike route (Class III) on the eastern portion, bike lane (Class II) on the western portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
6 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
39 mph
Westbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 11,534
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.467
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 16
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
303
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 16
Street: East Hillsdale Boulevard
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Gull Avenue
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 16
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
304
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 17
Street: Edgewater Boulevard
Segment: City Limits to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
1.16 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Education, Open Space, and Office
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides), on-street parallel parking (both sides) on the southern portion On-street, parallel (both sides) on the southern portion, none on the northern portion Bike lane with buffer (Class II) on the southern portion, bike lane (Class II) on the northern portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
15 SPEED DATA
40 mph
Northbound
44 mph
Southbound
44 mph
44 mph
36 to 45 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 19,130
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.370
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35 40 45 50
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 17
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
305
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 17
Street: Edgewater Boulevard
Segment: City Limits to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 17
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
306
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 18
Street: Edgewater Boulevard
Segment: Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin Street
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.97 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides), on-street parallel parking (west side) on northern portion On-street, parallel (one side, west only) on northern portion Bike lane (Class II)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
3 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
89%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 6,816
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.249
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 18
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
307
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 18
Street: Edgewater Boulevard
Segment: Beach Park Boulevard to Baffin Street
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 18
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
308
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 19
Street: Farragut/Halsey Boulevards
Segment: Beach Park Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.61 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
25 mph
Northbound
29 mph
Southbound
29 mph
29 mph
20 to 29 mph
94%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,397
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 1.286
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
15 20 25 30 35
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 19
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
309
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 19
Street: Farragut/Halsey Boulevards
Segment: Beach Park Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 19
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
310
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 20
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: East Third Avenue to East Hillsdale Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.79 mi.
Varies, 4 to 6
Curvilinear, flat to rolling
Mostly adequate, a few places with grades and curves that restrict sight distance Mixed - Commercial and Industrial
Varies, divided and TWLTL
None
None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
14 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
90%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 23,282
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.417
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 20
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
311
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 20
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: East Third Avenue to East Hillsdale Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 20
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
312
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 21
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.56 mi.
4 Straight, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Divided
On-street parking (one side, east only), 5+ feet shoulder (west side) on southern portion On-street, parallel (one side, east only)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III) on the west side of the southern portion only
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
10 SPEED DATA
40 mph
Northbound
44 mph
Southbound
43 mph
44 mph
35 to 44 mph
94%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 18,570
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.527
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35 40 45 50
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 21
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
313
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 21
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data and allowable 5 mph reduction, the 85th percentile speed rounds to a posted speed limit of 40 mph (i.e.,the existing posted speed limit). However, it is recommended that the posted speed limit be reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph to remain consistent with the adjacent segments on Foster City Boulevard (locations 20 and 22).
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 21
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
314
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 22
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.63 mi.
4 Straight, flat to rolling
Mostly adequate, a few places with grades and curves that restrict sight distance Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Divided
None
None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
3 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
91%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 4,070
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.641
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 22
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
315
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 22
Street: Foster City Boulevard
Segment: Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 22
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
316
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 23
Street: Gull Avenue
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.91 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Northbound
34 mph
Southbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
91%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 2,850
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 23
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
317
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 23
Street: Gull Avenue
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 23
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
318
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 24
Street: Marlin Avenue
Segment: Catamaran Street to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.98 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III), except on the southern portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Northbound
34 mph
Southbound
34 mph
34 mph
25 to 34 mph
93%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 4,452
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.251
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 24
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
319
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 24
Street: Marlin Avenue
Segment: Catamaran Street to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 24
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
320
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 25
Street: Metro Center Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.72 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Office, and Commercial
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides)
None
Bike lane (Class II), except on the east portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
10 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
39 mph
Westbound
38 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
93%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 11,450
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.665
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 25
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
321
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 25
Street: Metro Center Boulevard
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Foster City Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 25
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
322
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 26
Street: Pitcairn Drive
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Aruba Lane
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.69 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Eastbound
38 mph
Westbound
39 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
91%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 3,022
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 26
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
323
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 26
Street: Pitcairn Drive
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Aruba Lane
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 26
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
324
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 27
Street: Polaris Avenue
Segment: Altair Avenue to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.57 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Restricted at one location
Mixed - Residential, Education, and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
25 mph
Northbound
29 mph
Southbound
29 mph
29 mph
20 to 29 mph
89%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,984
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 15 20 25 30 35
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 27
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
325
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 27
Street: Polaris Avenue
Segment: Altair Avenue to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 27
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
326
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 28
Street: Polynesia Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Flying Mist Isle
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.43 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Education
Undivided on the eastern portion, divided on the western portion On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
0 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Eastbound
34 mph
Westbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
25 to 34 mph
91%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,340
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): n/a
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Westbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 28
Eastbound
Westbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
327
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 28
Street: Polynesia Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Flying Mist Isle
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 28
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
328
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 29
Street: Port Royal Avenue
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
1.45 mi.
2 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Undivided
On-street parking (both sides)
On-street, parallel (both sides)
None
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Northbound
34 mph
Southbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 1,137
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.665
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 29
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
329
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 29
Street: Port Royal Avenue
Segment: Edgewater Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 29
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
330
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 30
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: Metro Center Boulevard to East Hillsdale Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.24 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential, Commercial, and Open Space
Divided
0 to 5 feet on the northern portion
None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III) on the northern portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
3 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
38 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 6,194
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 1.106
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 30
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
331
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 30
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: Metro Center Boulevard to East Hillsdale Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 30
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
332
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 31
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.42 mi.
4 Straight, flat
Adequate
Mixed - Residential and Open Space
Divided
On-street parking (one side, west only), on-street bike facilities (both sides) On-street, parallel (one side, west only)
Bike lane with buffer (Class II) on east side, bike lane (Class II) on west side
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
9 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
31 to 40 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 10,588
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 1.109
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 31
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
333
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 31
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: East Hillsdale Boulevard to Bounty Drive
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 31
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
334
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 32
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.47 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat to rolling
Mostly adequate, a few places with grades and curves that restrict sight distance Mixed - Residential, Education, and Open Space
Divided
On-street bike facilities (both sides) on northern portion None
Bike lane (Class II) on northern portion
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
2 SPEED DATA
35 mph
Northbound
39 mph
Southbound
39 mph
39 mph
30 to 39 mph
93%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 3,748
Collision Review Period:
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.622
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
0 5
10 15
20 25
25 30 35 40 45
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 32
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
335
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 32
Street: Shell Boulevard
Segment: Bounty Drive to Beach Park Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 32
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
336
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 33
Street: Vintage Park Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Metro Center Boulevard
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
0.75 mi.
4 Curvilinear, flat to rolling
Mostly adequate, a few places with grades and curves that restrict sight distance Mixed - Office, Industrial, and Open Space
Divided
None
None
Shared-road/bike route (Class III)
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
2017 through 2021
1 SPEED DATA
30 mph
Northbound
34 mph
Southbound
34 mph
34 mph
26 to 35 mph
92%
Segment Length:
# of Travel Lanes:
Alignment, Grade:
Sight Distance:
Adjacent Land Uses:
Median Type:
Shoulder:
Parking:
Bike Facilities:
Average Daily Traffic: 10,938
Collision Review Period:
Combined Pace (Both Directions):
Percent in Pace Speed (Both Directions):
Reported Collisions During Review Period:
Collision Rate (collisions/million veh. mi.): 0.067
Existing Posted Speed Limit:
Direction 1:
Northbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Direction 2:
Southbound 85th Percentile Speed:
Combined 85th Percentile Speed (Both Directions):
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20 20 25 30 35 40
Number of Observations
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 33
Northbound
Southbound
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
337
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Foster City, California
LOCATION 33
Street: Vintage Park Drive
Segment: Foster City Boulevard to Metro Center Boulevard
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDED POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) specify that the posted speed limits are to be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, and the CVC and CA MUTCD allow for the posted speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph thereafter. Based on the collected speed radar data, the 85th percentile speed falls within the range to keep the existing posted speed limit, and, therefore, it is recommended that the posted speed limit remain unchanged.
0.00 0.10
0.20 0.30
0.40 0.50
0.60 0.70
0.80 0.90
1.00 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0
Cumulative Percentage
Speed (mph)
LOCATION 33
6.9 Attachment 2 - 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
338
4 9
3 DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: APPROPRIATION OF $573,629 TO ACCOUNT NO. 301-0910- 635-4251 AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $1,549,000 TO
ACCOUNT NO. 301-0910-637-4251 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF MEDIAN MODIFICATIONS – FOSTER CITY BLVD AT CHESS
DRIVE – MP#3 (CIP 301-635) AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT
FOSTER CITY BLVD AT CHESS DRIVE – MP #4, #7, AND #8
(CIP 301-637)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $573,629 to Account No. 301-0910-635-4251 and the appropriation of $1,549,000 to Account No. 301-0910-637-4251 for the construction of Median Modifications – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – MP#3 (CIP 301-635) and Improvements at Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – MP #4, #7, and #8 (CIP 301-637).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2009, the City commissioned a Multi-Project Traffic Analysis (MPTA) analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with four (4) development projects in the City. Four (4) of the eleven (11) recommended traffic improvement projects were combined into the scope of CIP 301-635 – Median Modifications – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – MP#3 and CIP 301-637 – Road Widening-Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – MP #4, #7, and #8.
6.10 6.10 Staff Report
339
4 9
3 The anticipated costs of the recommended projects were assigned to each of the four (4) developments based upon their pro rata anticipated impact on the identified traffic conditions. Approving the attached Resolution will appropriate the funding remaining in the development funds to the projects the funds were intended, which are $573,629 to CIP 301-635 and $1,549,000 to CIP 301-637. These funds were originally received as a result of development agreement for the Multi-Project Traffic Plan and are currently recorded in developers’ deposits accounts in Fund 301.
BACKGROUND
In 2009, the City commissioned an analysis to assess the potential impacts associated with four (4) development projects in the City, as well as other potential long-term development. The purpose of the study was to identify a comprehensive set of improvements that would address the individual and cumulative effects of additional traffic on the local and regional roadway network related to development. The findings from that study were consolidated into eleven (11) recommended projects that are known collectively as the Multi-Project Traffic Analysis or MPTA.
Four (4) specific developments were studied in the analysis – Gilead Sciences Campus Master Plan (300-368 Lakeside Drive), Chess Drive Office Buildings (3 buildings at 1155- 1191 Chess Drive), Foster Square/Atria (formerly Mirabella), and Pilgrim Triton. The anticipated costs of the MPTA recommendations for improvements were assigned to each of the four (4) developments based upon their pro rata anticipated impact to the identified traffic conditions. Later a fifth development, Lincoln Centre Life Sciences Campus (Biomed), similarly contributed funds to the projects based on its traffic impacts.
Of the eleven recommendations, seven (7) were either completed or determined to be infeasible. The remaining four (4) recommendations were combined into the following two (2) active and current CIPs:
•CIP 301-635 – Median Modifications – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – which consists of the following project from the MPTA – (#3) Lengthen northbound left-turn lanes on Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive to 650 feet. •CIP 301-637 – Road Widening – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive – which consists of the following three (3) projects from the MPTA – (#4) Lengthen westbound left-turn lane on Chess Drive at Foster City Boulevard; (#7) Construct northbound right-turn lane from Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive; and (#8) Construct second westbound through lane on Chess Drive at Foster City Boulevard.
ANALYSIS
6.10 6.10 Staff Report
340
4 9
3 The two projects, CIP 301-635 and CIP 301-637, were designed and will be constructed concurrently in order to achieve a shorter duration of disruption around this very busy intersection. Design is complete for both projects and the Call for Bids is scheduled for Spring 2024 following selection of a construction management firm (construction management proposals were received November 9, 2023). Award of contract and construction are planned in summer 2024.
Partial funding was appropriated to these projects for the design phase. At this time, staff is recommending appropriation of the remaining funding from the collected development funds that were designated for these projects for project construction. •The amount of development funding available for CIP 301-635 is $573,629 •The amount of development funding available for CIP 301-637 is $1,549,000 If any development funding remains in either project after project close-out, it will be returned to the contributing developer.
Action on this item will formalize the City’s intention to utilize these restricted developer contributions for construction of these two (2) projects.
California Environmental Quality Act
Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301(b) – Existing Facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action will appropriate $573,629 in restricted funding available to CIP 301-635 and will appropriate $1,549,000 in restricted funding available to CIP 301-637. Additional funding may be recommended for appropriation during the CIP budget preparation process based upon actual bid prices for the project. If any development funds remain in either project after the project close-out, it will be returned to the contributing developer.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Smart Planning, Development, and the Local Economy
Facilities And Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - CIP Project Descriptions for CIP 301-635 and CIP 301-637 (Excerpt from Adopted Annual Budget for FY 2023-2024)
6.10 6.10 Staff Report
341
1 5
5 1
RESOLUTION NO.____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY APPROPRIATING $573,629 TO ACCOUNT NO. 301-0910-635-4251 AND APPROPRIATING $1,549,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 301-0910-637-4251 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN MODIFICATIONS-FOSTER CITY BLVD. AT CHESS DRIVE- MP#3 (CIP 301-635) AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT FOSTER CITY BLVD AT CHESS DRIVE – MP #4, #7, AND #8 (CIP 301-637) AND FINDING THE APPROVAL
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15301(B)
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a Multi-Project Traffic Analysis (MPTA) analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with four development projects in the City identified recommended improvement projects, four (4) of which were combined into the scope of CIP 301-635 – Median Modifications – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive and CIP 301-637 - Road Widening-Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive; and
WHEREAS, CIP 301-635 – Median Modifications – Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive consists of the following project from the MPTA – (#3) Lengthen northbound left- turn lanes on Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive to 650 feet; and WHEREAS, CIP 301-637 –Road Widening-Foster City Blvd. at Chess Drive consists of the following three (3) projects from the MPTA – (#4) Lengthen westbound left-turn lane on Chess Drive at Foster City Boulevard; (#7) Construct northbound right- turn lane from Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive; and (#8) Construct second westbound through lane on Chess Drive at Foster City Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the anticipated costs of the recommendations were originally assessed to four (4) developments (Gilead Sciences Campus Master Plan, Chess Drive Office Buildings, Foster Square/Atria, Pilgrim Triton) based upon their pro rata share of the anticipated impact to the identified traffic conditions; and WHEREAS, subsequently, a fifth development, Biomed, similarly contributed funds to the projects based on its traffic impacts; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to appropriate the remaining funding available in order to formalize the City’s intention to utilize these restricted developer contributions for construction of these two projects and utilize the funds for the construction of the improvements as planned for 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council appropriates $573,629 to Account No. 301-0910-635-4251 and appropriates $1,549,000 to Account No. 301-0910-637-4251 for the construction of multi-project traffic improvements.
6.10 Attachment 1 - Resolution
342
1 5
5 1
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 18th day of December, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PATRICK SULLIVAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
6.10 Attachment 1 - Resolution
343
Excerpt from Adopted Annual Budget for FY 2023-2024
Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) consists of projects to maintain and enhance the City/District’s infrastructure of roadways, sidewalks, utilities, structures, and facilities for the benefit of the community.
The primary objective of the CIP is to develop and implement projects to ensure continued and reliable delivery of service to meet the City/District’s needs. The following is a summary of active projects to be managed during Fiscal Year 2023-2024.
Ongoing Projects:
(CIP 301-635, Budget $345,540) Median Modifications – Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive – Multi-Project #3 (2013-2014)
The project addresses improvements at the intersection of Foster City Boulevard and Chess Drive. The project includes lengthening the northbound left-turn lanes on northbound Foster City Boulevard at Chess Drive to reduce the likelihood of traffic queues extending out of the turn lanes into the through traffic lanes on Foster City Boulevard.
On August 4, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-86 authorizing an agreement with BKF Engineers, Inc. to prepare construction contract documents and provide construction support services for both CIP 301-635 and CIP 301-637 (described later in this document). The design and construction of these projects were combined to maximize efficiency. Design is complete and the Caltrans encroachment permit has been issued to the City. An easement agreement has been executed between Gilead Sciences and the City to allow for the construction of the improvements.
The Multi-Project Roadway Improvements were funded by four large developments based on each development's contribution to traffic impacts. The funds were identified in each development's Master Development Agreement and were allocated to CIP 301-635 and CIP 301-637. Staff is in the process of reviewing proposals for Construction Management services. Construction is anticipated to commence following selection of a CM Firm.
Project Timeline:
Design: Completed
Construction: FY 2023-2024
City of Foster City's FY 2023-24 Final Budget