Foster City City Council
November 18, 2024

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

DRAFT PARKS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT

FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

502

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

Table of Contents

Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 3 System-Wide Results ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Access & Connectivity ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Comfort and Sense of Safety ............................................................................................................................. 9 Functionality ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Condition............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Combined Scores ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Park Specific Results .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A: Park Assessment Methodology Memo ...................................................................................... 20 Appendix B: Park Assessment Scoring Spreadsheet ............................................. (See Separate Document)

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

503

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

INTRODUCTION
Foster City is a relatively small community with a dense park system. The parks are clean, well - maintained, and consist of lush plantings and water-front views of the San Francisco Bay and F oster City Lagoon. Generally, the parks are safe, quiet, and well-used – kids, adults, and seniors alike engage with the spaces. While typical amenities such as playgrounds, sports courts, and picnic areas are available, many City parks are uniquely located and designed to facilitate water-related activities such as kayaking, boating, and windsurfing.

As part of the of the Foster City Parks Master Plan, WRT assessed existing conditions of City parks to better understand how they are serving residents. This assessment, in addition to other analyses and engagement results, will be used to inform park recommendations that will be included in the Foster City Parks Master Plan.

Table 1 indicates the assessed parks by type and size. Park types are defined as follows:
• Community Parks are large parks (typically 10-30 acres) that provide a wide variety of active and passive recreational opportunities that serve a substantial portion of the City. • Neighborhood Parks are medium-sized parks (typically 2 to 10 acres) that provide a small range of amenities that meet the daily recreational needs for one or more neighborhoods. • Mini-Parks are small parks (typically less than 2 acres) that provide basic recreation amenities for nearby residents in a specific neighborhood or subdivision. • Special Use Parks are designed around a specialized use which serves a specifi c recreational need or population group (such as a dog- owners or windsurfers).

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

504

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Table 1: Assessed City of Foster City Parks
Park Name Park Type Park Acres
Boothbay Community 11.2
Edgewater Community 8.5
Leo J. Ryan Community 20.7
Sea Cloud Community 23.9
Catamaran Neighborhood 5.9
Erckenbrack Neighborhood 3.5
Farragut Neighborhood 3.8
Gull Neighborhood 3.1
Killdeer Neighborhood 2.4
Marlin Neighborhood 3.1
Port Royal Neighborhood 3.9
Shad Neighborhood 2.2
Shorebird Neighborhood 3.5
Sunfish Neighborhood 2.4
Arcturus Mini 0.8
Gateshead Mini 0.1
Ketch Mini 1.6
Leo Mini 0.02
Pompano Mini 0.6
Turnstone Mini 1.5
Baywinds Special Use 1.3
Boat Park* Special Use 1.6
Bridgeview Special Use 3.2
Dog Park* Special Use 1.6
* Boat Park and Dog Park are considered two separate Foster City Parks. However, since they are part of one cohesive site, they were assessed together in this analysis.

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

505

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Map 1: City of Foster City Parks & Recreation System

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

506

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Methodology
This assessment’s methodology has been tried and tested by WRT and has been tailored specifically to the unique conditions within Foster City. It should be noted that t his assessment is meant to be a tool to better understand the parks system and is not a prescriptive scoring mechanism. Since this is a qualitative assessment, the scores and weights contained in this report are based on the planning team’s perspectives and are inevitably subjective to a degree.

The assessment was conducted by WRT in August 2024. The project team assessed the parks according to a set of criteria that fall into the following four categories (see Appendix A for detailed assessment criteria):
• Access & Connectivity refers to the general accessibility of amenities for users of all abilities1.

This includes factors such as signage, internal/external path connectivity , safe pedestrian crossings, parking and more.
• Comfort & Sense of Safety refers to the presence or absence of comfort amenities such as seating, shade, drinking fountains, and restrooms. It also assesses criteria that affect the feeling of safety within a park, such as unobstructed sightlines, signs of vandalism, and lighting. • Functionality refers to how well the park functions for serving recreational needs. It includes criteria such as the presence and arrangement of amenities, appropriateness of vegetation, and compatibility with neighboring land uses .
• Condition refers to the physical condition of park assets and amenities and identifies signs of deferred maintenance2.

A rating scale of 1-10 was used for scoring each criterion. This scale was broken down as follows:

Poor (0 - 4.0)
Fair (4.1 - 6.0)
Good (6.1 – 8.0)
Great (8.1 – 10)

Additionally, criteria were weighted in accordance with their level of importance for achieving each category’s objective. For example, presence of amenities was highly weighted for the Functionality Category, while criteria such as erosion had a low weight. Criteria weights are indicated in Appendix A .

Leo J. Ryan Park was identified as a benchmark to help establish a baseline for which to measure other City parks. The park was selected for its overall success within all the assessed categories and overall popularity within the community. In addition to the score, descriptive field notes were added and photos were taken throughout to illustrate the findings.

1 Note: this is not a detailed ADA assessment. For such, refer to the City of Foster City’s 2022 Park Accessibility Reports 2 Note: this is a general qualitative analysis and not a detailed assessment of every park feature.

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

507

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

SYSTEM-WIDE RESULTS
This section provides further detail about the assessment’s key system-wide findings in the areas of Access & Connectivity, Comfort & Sense of Safety, Functionality, and Condition. For each category, park scores are presented followed by a list of key takeaways .

Access & Connectivity
Access & Connectivity refers to the general accessibility of park amenities for users of all abilities 3. This includes factors such as signage, internal/external path connectivity, safe pedestrian crossings, parking and more. Figure 1 illustrates the park scores for Access & Connectivity. In general, Foster City parks score highest in this category with an average score of 8.1. The highest scoring parks included Leo J.

Ryan, Shorebird, and Gateshead, which generally have great internal and external path connectivity.

Parks such as Pompano, Baywinds, Turnstone, Shad, and Edgewater scored lower in this category particularly due to their lack of internal pathways , signage and clear edge permeability.

Figure 1: Park Access & Connectivity Scores

3 Note: this is not a detailed ADA assessment. For such, refer to the City of Foster City’s 2022 Park Accessibility Reports

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

508

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Key Takeaways for Access & Connectivity:

1. Variable Path Connectivity
Pathways within parks are not always intuitive nor do they always connect to park amenities. Within some of the City’s larger parks, there is a need for secondary paths to connect amenities and provide a contiguous walking experience. In parks with many amenities ( i.e. Edgewater and Sea Cloud), the path network is less intuitive, hidden and divided by fencing.

2. Some Parks are Difficult to Find
Many Foster City parks have open boundaries and clearly define d entrances that can be seen immediately from the roads. Others, however, are located in the interior or residential neighborhoods at the end of long drives, which makes parks difficult to find and access.

3. Inconsistent Signage
Many Foster City parks have large, blue entrance signs, with a few of the interior-facing neighborhood parks having logos painted on the pavement to signify the entrance (Killdeer, Ketch). However, s ome parks have little to no signage save for small plaques that state regulations.

4. Well-Connected Bike/Pedestrian Network, but Lack of Supportive Amenities Bicycle and pedestrian connectivity rated high, especially for parks directly connected to the Bay Trail or thoughtfully integrated into pedestrian path networks (Leo J. Ryan, Boat/Dog). However, there is a general lack of bike amenities, especially bike racks.

5. Heavily-Used Parks Lack Off-Street Parking
Street parking for most parks seems sufficient. However, parks (Catamaran and Edgewater) where larger events are hosted, or containing many amenities may require additional parking.

Lack Path Connectivity in Edgewater Park Well-Connected Bike/Pedestrian Network in Leo J. Ryan

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

509

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Comfort and Sense of Safety
Comfort & Sense of Safety refers to the presence or absence of comfort amenities such as seating, shade, drinking fountains, and restrooms. It also assesses criteria that affect the feeling of safety within a park, such as unobstructed sightlines, signs of vandalism, and lighting. Figure 2 illustrates the park scores for Comfort & Sense of Safety. In general, Foster City parks scored well in this category though slightly lower than the other categories (average score 6.7). In general, the City’s Community and Neighborhood parks scored better in this category compared to the City’s mini and special use parks. The lowest rated parks (including Pompano, Bridgeview, Gateshead, and Baywinds ) generally lack adequate shade and/or comfort amenities.

Figure 2: Park Comfort & Sense of Safety Scores

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

510

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Key Takeaways for Comfort & Sense of Safety

1. More Shade
Though parks are generally well-shaded, more shade is needed around seating and active amenity areas. The selection of shade trees should take mature height and canopy foliage into consideration, to provide a comfortable experience.

2. Additional Comfort Amenities
Generally, mini parks had less comfort amenities such benches, water fountains and trash receptacle available. In Foster City’s larger parks, comfort amenities tend to be consolidated in one area rather than consistently spread throughout the park. In both instances, additional facilities might be warranted. Additional bathrooms may also be warranted in some park to provide a more comfortable experience.

3. Noise Mitigation Design that can be Applied Elsewhere Noise mitigation methods such as berms, plantings and offset sidewalks were observed (particularly at Leo J. Ryan), which can be applied to other parks located next to busy roads ( such as Boat & Dog and Bridgeview). Many of the City’s smaller parks are quietly nested in residential areas and are not in need of noise mitigation.

4. Inconsistent Lighting
Though some parks have their main paths and amenities lit, lighting is inconsistent throughout the park system and could be further studied to increase sense of safety within parks at night.

Berms to Mitigate Noise at Leo J. Ryan Lack of Shade at Bridgeview Lack of Amenities at Pompano

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

511

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Functionality
Functionality refers to how well the park functions for serving recreational needs. It includes criteria such as the presence and arrangement of amenities, appropriateness of vegetation, and compatibility with neighboring land uses. Figure 3 illustrates the park scores for Functionality. In general, Foster City parks scored well in this category though slightly lower than the other categories (average score 6. 8). High scoring parks tend to have a variety of amenities (such as Port Royal, Sea Cloud, Leo J. Ryan, Catamaran, and Ketch). Parks with limited amenities scored lower, including Pompano, Leo, and Bridgeview Park.

Figure 3: Park Functionality Scores

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

512

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Key Takeaways

1. Variety of Amenities
Foster City parks offer a range of amenities , including extensive sports fields (Catamaran Park, Sea Cloud Park, and Edgewater Park), water/beach access (Leo J. Ryan, Gull Park, Erkenbrack Park, Marlin Park, and Boat/Dog). However, some of the City’s smaller parks significantly lack amenities, such as Pompano, Bridgeview, and Little Leo.

2. Functional Park Layouts
Most amenities are strategically located, with restrooms situated near sports fields and courts, in easily accessible areas, or at trail entrances. Sports fields/courts and play facilities are typically situated at a distance from residential neighborhoods which mitigates noise concerns.

3. Water-Loving Landscapes
Water-intensive trees such as Redwoods, Willows, and Agapanthus are consistently planted throughout the park system. Turf areas are generally ubiquitous across the park system with only a few of the parks having distinct planting areas (i.e. a rose garden, salvia-lined fencing, and shrub/grassy edges at Farragut Park and Killdeer). The planting at Shorebird P ark is noticeably different from other parks, as it incorporates a thoughtful selection of low-water, low-maintenance planting into its landscape.

4. Compatible with Neighbors
Parks are generally located within quiet residential areas ; fencing and vegetation screening provides additional privacy for nearby homes. Particularly, parks integrated with recreation facilities (Leo J.

Ryan) or school facilities (Killdeer) rated high in this category.

Variety of Amenities at Port Royal Fencing and Vegetation at Killdeer Vegetation at Shorebird

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

513

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Condition
Condition refers to the physical condition of park assets and amenities and identifies signs of deferred maintenance. Figure 4 illustrates the park scores for Condition. On average, City parks scored high in this category (average score of 7.4). Unlike the other categories, the City’s mini parks condition score was highest of all the park types. Variation in condition is minimal, showing that the City consistently delivers a high standard of maintenance.

Figure 4: Park Condition Scores

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

514

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Key Takeaways

1. Geese Impacts on Cleanliness
Many water-adjacent parks’ condition is heavily impacted by the presence of geese (Marlin, Erckenbrack, Boat/Dog, Gull). Droppings and feathers diminish the overall cleanliness of the site, and many geese seem to evade current mitigation methods – such as fencing.

2. Variable Amenity Condition
The sports fields and courts in Foster City are generally well -maintained – though some rubber surfaces could benefit from cleaning and maintenance due to stains or residue (Turnstone Park, Shad Park). The overall condition of playgrounds ranges from fair to good, with several in need of replacement. Likewise, the design of play facilities varies, with the most memorable defined by vibrant color and form (Killdeer, Arturus).

3. Inconsistent Furnishings
Park site furnishings are generally well-maintained, clean and in good condition, with only a few specific instances of damaged. Furnishing design and finishes varies from park to park. Establishing amenity standards would create a more consistent aesthetic or brand in City parks and would help streamline maintenance efforts.

4. Variable Vegetative Condition
Foster City's parks are home to a variety of large, mature trees in variable condition, with several park trees struggling to thrive. Other vegetation, such as Lily of the Nile, Rose Laurel, Pride of Madeira, and Common Boxwood are frequently used to enhance entrances or line fences and are also generally in good condition. Some Lily of the Nile appear withered. Though the current vegetation at Bridgeview is in good condition, there is a general lack of plants as many were recently removed.

The native planting at Shorebird Park represents a promising initiative, although some boxwood plants have been removed due to poor performance. The selection of planting ma terial should be carefully considered to ensure species are well -suited for Foster City’s climatic and soil conditions.

Geese in Marlin Park Vegetation at Erckenbrack Park Quality Furniture at Bridgeview

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

515

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Combined Scores
Figure 5, Map 2, and Table 2 illustrate and compare the overall scores for each Foster City Park . The combined score indicates the average of the four categories and represents a complete assessment of each park. Highly rated parks include Leo J. Ryan, Port Royal, Catamaran, and Ketch. Bridgeview, Pompano, and Baywinds Parks were the lowest rat ed parks, indicating a need for improvement. Overall, the City’s Community and Neighborhood parks tended to score slightly higher than its Mini and Special Use parks.

Figure 5: Park Combined Assessment Scores

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

516

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Map 2: Park Combined Assessment Score

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

517

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Table 2: Assessment Score Summary

Park Name Park Type
Access +
Connectivity
Score
Comfort +
Sense of Safety
Functionality
Score
Condition
Score
Combined
Score
Boothbay Community 8.2 6.7 7.6 7.0 7.4
Edgewater Park Community 6.7 6.6 7.1 8.1 7.1
Leo J. Ryan Community 9.7 7.8 8.2 8.3 8.5
Sea Cloud Park Community 7.3 6.8 8.3 7.3 7.4
Catamaran Park Neighborhood 8.6 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.2
Erckenbrack Park Neighborhood 8.2 7.5 7.6 6.7 7.5
Farragut Park Neighborhood 8.4 7.2 7.0 7.0 7.4
Gull Park Neighborhood 8.3 7.2 7.4 6.7 7.4
Killdeer Park Neighborhood 8.1 6.6 7.5 7.3 7.4
Marlin Park Neighborhood 8.3 6.6 7.1 6.4 7.1
Port Royal Neighborhood 9.2 7.8 8.5 8.0 8.4
Shad Park Neighborhood 7.0 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.9
Shorebird Park Neighborhood 9.6 6.9 6.4 7.7 7.6
Sunfish Park Neighborhood 7.4 7.0 6.8 7.3 7.1
Arcturus Park Mini 7.9 6.2 6.1 6.6 6.7
Gateshead Mini 9.6 5.8 5.3 8.3 7.2
Ketch Park Mini 9.1 6.2 8.4 8.3 8.0
Leo Park Mini 8.3 6.9 4.6 8.8 7.1
Pompano Park Mini 5.1 4.4 3.7 8.0 5.3
Turnstone Park Mini 7.2 6.2 7.3 7.1 7.0
Baywinds Park Special Use 6.9 5.9 5.4 6.5 6.2
Boat/Dog Park Special Use 8.8 6.9 7.3 7.2 7.5
Bridgeview Park Special Use 8.1 5.6 3.9 7.4 6.2

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

518

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

PARK SPECIFIC RESULTS
Table 3 outlines specific takeaways from the Park Assessment for each individual park, highligh ting each’s key areas of strength and improvement. The recommendations in the master plan will capitalize on park strengths and strengthen areas where improvement is needed.

Table 3: Park-Specific Strengths and Areas of Improvement Park Name Park Type Overall
Score Key Strengths Key Areas of Improvement
Boothbay Community 7.4 a variety of amenities available, site is well- connected
Additional shade, updated amenities,
lighting
Edgewater Community 7.1 Many amenities available in good condition Better path connectivity and amenity
placement, better use of underutilized
open lawn areas
Leo J. Ryan Community 8.5
Water access; well connected to
neighborhoods; a variety of unique amenities;
great condition, event spaces
Additional signage and benches, external
path connectivity, lighting
Sea Cloud Community 7.4 Many types of sports amenities; adjacent to Bay Trail
Additional signage, improve layout and
path system, lighting
Catamaran Neighborhood 8.2 Well-connected to surroundings; variety in amenities Additional shade
Erckenbrack Neighborhood 7.5 Lagoon beach access; diverse plantings, good visibility from street
Life-cycle replacement of paving and
comfort amenities
Farragut Neighborhood 7.4 Mature trees and diverse planting, well- connected to neighborhood
Additional recreation and comfort
amenities
Gull Neighborhood 7.4 Lagoon beach access; good visibility from street
Better internal path connectivity; life-cycle
amenity replacement
Killdeer Neighborhood 7.4 Connectivity to adjacent school, good entry signage, well-shaded seating areas
Better use of underutilized lawn areas,
additional comfort amenities
Marlin Neighborhood 7.1 Lagoon beach access; good visibility from street
Additional shade and recreational/comfort
amenities
Port Royal Neighborhood 8.4 Well-connected to Bay Trail; good layout with shaded play area Additional shade
Shad Neighborhood 6.9 Quiet location; shaded by large redwoods; major amenities located near entry
Life-cycle amenity replacement; additional
signage and seating; lacks a bathroom
Shorebird Neighborhood 7.6 Thoughtful low-water use plantings; adjacent to Bay Trail; educational signage throughout
Additional recreation and comfort
amenities
Sunfish Neighborhood 7.1 Well-connected to neighborhood; quiet location
Additional signage, shade, and comfort
amenities; better use of underutilized
open lawn areas
Arcturus Mini 6.7 Connects to nearby Edgewater Park; well- shaded by mature trees
Additional signage, improve entrance
visibility, additional recreation and comfort
amenities
Gateshead Mini 7.2 Well-connected to the Bay Trail; intuitive path network; great condition
Lacks signage, comfort amenities, and
recreational amenities
Ketch Mini 8.0 Good entry signage on paving; quiet located, planting variety
Life-cycle amenity replacement, better
distribution of comfort amenities
Leo Mini 7.1 Open and quiet Need for basic amenities and identifying features and signage
Pompano Mini 5.3 Open and quiet Needs internal circulation, shade, amenities, and signage.

Turnstone Mini 7.0 Quiet location, diverse planting Need signage/identifying entry features, and comfort and recreation amenities
Baywinds Special Use 6.2 Located next to the Bay Trail; serves windsurfers, dogwalkers, walkers, bikers
Improved visibility and signage from street,
additional amenities; layout is divided by
parking lot
Boat/Dog Special Use 7.5 Accessible boat launch; shaded and fenced dog area Traffic noise mitigation
Bridgeview Special Use 6.2 Trailhead to the Bay Trail Additional trees/shade; additional amenities

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

519

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the Foster City Parks Assessment offers a thorough evaluation of the city's parks, highlighting both their strengths and areas for improvement. Overall, the assessment underscores that Foster City has a high-quality park system, but targeted enhancements are needed to better meet community needs.

One key takeaway is that access and connectivity within the park system are generally strong, particularly in parks like Leo J. Ryan and Shorebird, which have well -integrated pathways. However, parks like Edgewater and Baywinds have challenges within this category and need some accessibility and navigation improvements, such as additional signage and improved visibility or path connectivity.

A second major insight regards comfort and safety within City of Foster City parks. While many of the parks are comfortable and provide a sense of security, inconsistent lighting and the need for additional shade, seating, and restrooms are noted as recurring issues. Expanding these amenities will enhance user comfort and make the parks more welcoming for all visitors.

The City’s parks generally have good functionality, though some areas need improvement. Parks like Leo J. Ryan and Port Royal offer a diverse range of amenities and well -placed features that meet various recreational needs. However, smaller parks like Pompano and Bridgeview lack sufficient amenities, limiting their overall function. Additionally, many parks rely on water -intensive vegetation. Enhancing amenities and adopting more sustainable landsc aping would improve the overall functionality of the park system.

Lastly, the condition of the parks is notable, with many parks offering well-maintained amenities and landscapes. However, challenges such as geese impacts on water -adjacent parks and variability in the condition of playgrounds and sports fields were observed. Addressing these issues through enhanced maintenance strategies and vegetation management will ensure that the parks continue to serve the community effectively.

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

520

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
APPENDIX A:

PARK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY MEMO

FOSTER CITY PARKS MASTER PLAN

The following methodology indicates the criteria for how the Park Assessment will be conducted in Foster City.

Score Categories

1. Access & Connectivity

2. Comfort + Sense of Safety

3. Condition

4. Functionality

Scoring Instructions

All items should be scored on a 1 to 10 scale
• Poor (0 - 4.0)
• Fair (4.1 - 6.0)
• Good (6.1 – 8.0)
• Great (8.1 – 10)

Access + Connectivity

Edge Permeability
Weight: 2
Visibility of the park from the street. Considers the design of edges and entrances and how they distinguish the park from its surroundings.

1. Entrances/Access obscured and entrances are difficult to find

5. Entrances/Access defined and can be identified from at least 300 feet away

10. Entrances/Access clearly defined - able to be distinguished from 300 feet away and has multiple entrances not inhibiting access; park activities are visible from the street

Signage, Maps, and City Branding
Weight: 3
Presence of wayfinding signs with information regarding park name, park hours, allowed uses (including pet related), maps with trail information if applicable, non- English languages where relevant, and location of signage for high visibility.

1. No park signage

5. Entrance sign and minimal secondary signs, limited information

10.Well-designed signage system – unobtrusive, understandable

Accessibility
Weight: 3
General observations for accessible features that accommodate users of various abilities.

Features to consider includes accessible surfacing, gradual slopes, presence of all -abilities amenities (accessible playgrounds, picnic tables, loop paths, etc.).

1. Poor accessible circulation and does not include any all -ability amenities

5. Limited accessible circulation and amenities

10.Park has generally accessible circulation and includes amenities for all -abilities.

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

521

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Internal Path Connectivity
Weight: 5
Presence of continuous pathways connecting all activities in the park.

1. Pathways circuitous/confusing, missing connections

5. Pathways adequate

10. Destinations clearly connected and intuitive - circulation very easy to understand

Pedestrian Connectivity
Weight: 4
Presence of trails or sidewalks in good condition connecting the park to the surrounding community. Safe crosswalks at intersections near the park (n/a when park entrance is located along a small, low -traffic street)

1. No trails or sidewalks connect the park to the surrounding community.

5. Trails or sidewalks exist in the vicinity but are not well -integrated with the park or have limited connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods.

10.Trails or sidewalks are integrated into and enhance park circulation and connect to the broader community and activity areas.

Safe Pedestrian Crossings
Weight: 2
Presence of clearly marked crosswalks at intersections near the park, especially on high traffic streets. (n/a when park entrance is located along a small, low -traffic street)

1. Unsafe crossing relative to street width/traffic volume

5. Standard crossing treatment present

10. Crossing treatment prioritizes pedestrian and/or is directly integrated into park circulation

Bicycle Connectivity
Weight: 1
Availability of dedicated/clearly marked bike lanes/paths leading to the park (unless parks are located on quiet residential streets),, and availability of bike parking/bike- racks either on the street or in the park. Bike parking quantity per size of park and appropriatel y located.

1. No marked bike route connecting near park (within 100 yards), no bike parking observed on site

5. Adequate bike route connects directly to park (Class II, III, or IV), bike parking observed / but not conveniently located or adequate

10. Safe, low-stress bike route connects directly to park (Class I , IV/ Fully Separated), ample bike parking for park and neighboring areas

Parking
Weight: 1
Adequate on-site parking or on-street parking for park’s size/function. Parking has good connectivity with park elements.

1. Insufficient parking, very poor connectivity

5. Adequate parking, adequate connectivity

10. Sufficient parking and connectivity

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

522

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Comfort + Sense of Safety

Availability of Shade
Weight: 5
Presence of shaded areas which provide relief from the sun.

1. No available structures or trees which provide shade

5. Some amenities are shaded

10. Large trees or structures are present throughout park, especially at noon

Availability of comfort amenities (seating, water fountains, trash receptacles, etc.) Weight: 5
Ample places to rest, access drinking water, and dispose of waste.

1. Limited comfort amenities available

5. A few available comfort amenities in select locations

10. Comfort amenities available at consistent intervals in park

Availability of restrooms (if applicable)
Weight: 4
Public restrooms are open for public use and easily accessible.

1. No available restrooms

5. Restrooms available, but limited in number or hours

10. Adequate number of restrooms that serve the park

Mitigation of Views / Noise from Surrounding Land Uses
Weight: 1
Effective mitigation of unappealing surrounding land uses, such as industrial facilities, derelict structures, etc. (n/a if no such adjacent uses)

1.Park does not mitigate unappealing surrounding land uses or noise

5.Park has some screening of unappealing surrounding land uses or noise

10. Park completely screens unappealing surrounding land uses, unappealing surroundings or noise imperceptible

No Signs of Unauthorized Activity
Weight: 2
Presence of intentionally damaged features such as broken furniture or graffiti.

1. Significant signs of unauthorized activity

5. Some signs of unauthorized activity

10. No signs of unauthorized activity

Line of Sight + Openness
Weight: 1
Evaluation will only apply to use zones of park (i.e., parks next to open spaces or creeks will not be negatively scored by the presence of taller/un- maintained vegetation)

1. Overgrown vegetation within 3’-8’, or hidden areas present near use zones

5. Some overgrown vegetation but generally open near use zones within 3’ -8’

10. No overgrown vegetation inhibiting clear sightlines throughout park

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

523

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

Lighting
Weight: 3
Visual inspection to occur during the day, light levels will not be evaluated

1. No light fixtures at major amenity area(s) or major pathways

5. Light fixtures present but not at all major amenity area(s) or major pathways

10. All major amenity areas and major pathways appear to have appropriate quantity of light fixtures

Functionality

Presence and/or Diversity of Activities / Amenities
Weight: 5
Variety of amenities serving different user types (characterized by interests, age, passive/active activities) that is appropriate for the park’s size

1. Few amenities and programming available for users.

5. Standard programming, such as playground, seating, area, and lawn are available.

10. Diversity of passive/active activities, serving people of different ages, and different interests.

Appropriate Amenity Adjacencies
Weight: 3
Are amenities placed in a logical and balanced way to minimize any disruption

1. Amenities are not logically placed

5. Amenities are somewhat logically placed

10. All amenity areas are placed in the most logical place on site

Diversity + Appropriateness of Vegetation
Weight: 2
Variety of tree, shrub, and groundcover vegetation that is functionally and climatically appropriate. Turf areas have recreational value and purpose.

1. Limited vegetation variety, less than 50% of turf areas are purposeful.

5. Some vegetation variety, at least 50% of turf areas are purposeful

10. Significant variety of vegetation, at least 75% of turf areas are purposeful

Absence of Visible Drainage Issues or Erosion
Weight: 1
Visual inspection of puddling, flooding issues, or areas that are being eroded

1. There is significant signs of flooding or erosions throughout the park

5. There are some areas with flooding or erosion issues

10. There is no presence of flooding or erosion issues

Compatibility with Neighbors
Weight: 1
The adjacent residential, commercial, or educational uses benefit or do not disturb park users; vice ver sa.

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

524

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT

1. Adjacent uses are not appropriate

5. Adjacent uses could raise concerns

10.Adjacent uses are appropriate

Condition

Paving Condition
Weight: 3
Potholes / cracks, looser pavers, deterioration, overall attractiveness, and relevance.

1. Poor condition, tripping concerns, not in appropriate locations

5. Fair condition, in appropriate locations

10. Excellent condition and in appropriate locations

Vegetation Condition
Weight: 3
No overgrown grass or dirt patches, overall maintenance of planted areas, appropriate pruning, presence of weeds.

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Tree Condition
Weight: 3
Ample amount of distribution throughout site and overall attractiveness

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Playground Condition
Weight: 3
Equipment condition (broken/protruding parts, rust), mulch, rubber, etc. Relevance of play equipment, variety of play equipment.

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Sport Field Condition
Weight: 3
Weeds, low spots, lighting, equipment condition.

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Sport Court Condition
Weight: 3

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

525

Parks Assessment Summary Report
Foster City Parks Master plan
November 13, 2024 DRAFT
Cracks, weeds, lighting, equipment condition.

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Restroom Facilities Condition
Weight: 3
Only parks with a restroom / building will be evaluated. Usable (not locked), sufficient provision for scale of the park, reasonably maintained (no severe maintenance issues)

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Comfort Amenities Condition (Benches, Tables, Water Fountains, Trash Receptacles) Weight: 3
Fixture condition (broken/protruding parts, rust, cracking, graffiti/vandalism)

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Beaches Condition
Weight: 3
Beach condition (vegetation growth, presence of rocks, quality and depth of sand)

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

Lighting Condition
Weight: 3
Fixture condition (broken/protruding parts, rust, cracking, graffiti/vandalism)

1. Poor condition

5. Fair condition

10. Excellent condition

8.1 Attachment 1 - WRT Parks Assessment Summary Report

526

DATE: November 18, 2024

TO: President and Members of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Board of Directors
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, District Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant District Manager

FROM: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director/District Engineer Laura Galli, Engineering Manager
Francine Magno, Senior Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 455-652) – CLEAN WATER
PROGRAM – UPDATE FOR QUARTER 3 – JULY THROUGH
SEPTEMBER 2024

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) by minute order, receive and accept this Q3 progress update on the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Master Plan Improvements Project (CIP 455- 652) – Clean Water Program (CWP). No further action is required by the EMID Board of Directors.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the progress-to-date of the WWTP Master Plan Improvements Project (CIP 455-652) - Clean Water Program (CWP) for the City of San Mateo/EMID WWTP for the months of July 2024 through September 2024. The report includes summary information about construction and other project activities over the third quarter of the calendar year.

8.2 8.2 Staff Report

527

BACKGROUND
The CWP is a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program to rehabilitate the sanitary sewer collection system in the City of San Mateo and the treatment systems at the San Mateo WWTP. EMID has 24.12% ownership of the WWTP. In October 2014, the City of San Mateo retained Jacobs to serve as the Program Manager responsible for overseeing the management of the approximately $1 billion-dollar combined program, including the coordination of the design, construction, and start-up activities of this multi-year project.

The EMID Board of Directors has requested that staff provide updates on a regular basis. The WWTP Expansion Project is being performed using a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) delivery method, whereby the contractor is involved in the project early in the design process and the City benefits from the contractor providing constructability input and insight to inform the design development.

The Program Manager and Construction Manager is Jacobs. The WWTP Expansion Project Design Engineer is HDR. HDR is also providing Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC). The CMAR is Sundt Construction Inc. (Sundt).

ANALYSIS
Construction Package 1 – Site Preparation (Original Agreement with Sundt - $33,098,178) – Project is complete and project closeout activities are continuing.

Construction Package 2 – Foundation Piles (Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Sundt - $17,716,049) – Project is complete and closed out.

Construction Package 3 – WWTP Facilities (Amendment No. 2 to Sundt Agreement) is over 90% complete and is in its final stages.

Construction Package 3 Progress
Construction of the Primary Clarifiers is substantially complete. Installation of yard piping is complete, except for final connection of the force mains to the Headworks building which is scheduled for January 2025. Electrical equipment (gear including cabinets, breakers, switches, conduit and wiring) and mechanical equipment (piping with structural supports, motors, and pumps) continues to be installed in Areas 51 (Headworks), 53 (Bio-Actiflo), 55 (BNR), and 56 (MBR), with the major remaining items primarily in Areas 53, 55, and 56. Improvements to the following existing facilities continues: sodium hypochlorite day and bulk storage tanks and pumping systems; sodium bisulfate tanks and pumping systems; and chlorine contact basins. General sitewide work, such as site lighting, irrigation, landscaping, signage, and parking lot work, is still ongoing.

8.2 8.2 Staff Report

528

Administration Building and Maintenance Warehouse
Construction of the Administration Building and Maintenance Warehouse is substantially complete, and both buildings are now furnished. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) commissioning activities for the Administration Building are nearing completion. The project team is still working on final punch list items and is working with San Mateo’s Building and Fire Departments to obtain Temporary Occupancy for both buildings. The City/WWTP Operations staff is planning to occupy the building by the end of the year.

Plant Commissioning
Construction of the new treatment facilities is still anticipated to be complete in late November 2024. Clean water testing, process seeding (the introduction of microorganisms into the wastewater being treated), startup, and functional demonstration is still expected to occur in the December 2024 to February 2025 timeframe. The new liquid treatment processes are still anticipated to be in full service by March 2025.

Final Project Completion
The current final completion is projected to be October 2025 (as of the end of September 2024). The overall schedule has not changed since last quarter’s update.

Efforts by the contractor to mitigate prior schedule impacts from multiple change events are ongoing.

QUARTERLY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
Attachment #1 consists of selected portions of the Quarterly Progress Report for July through September 2024 published by the Program Management Team on October 21, 2024, summarizing the budget, schedule, and project activities that have occurred during the third quarter of 2024 and activities that are anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter of 2024 for the following projects:
•WWTP Expansion Project (comprised of GMP-1, GMP-2, and GMP-3), •Immediate Action Projects (IAPs)- supercritical major infrastructure projects, and •Annual Major Component Projects (AMCs)- ongoing annual maintenance projects.

Attachment #2 consists of a site plan showing the locations of the various process units being constructed as part of the projects.

Attachment #3 includes photographs of construction activities at the site over the past 3 months.

8.2 8.2 Staff Report

529

Attachment #4 includes a history of the Project financing.

More detailed information including additional photographs and architectural renderings of the completed WWTP Expansion Project as well as real time video of the active construction, are available on the Clean Water Program Project site:
https://cleanwaterprogramsanmateo.org/wwtp/.

CEQA
A Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the WWTP Master Plan Improvements Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2015032006).

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with receiving this update.

As described in the Quarterly Report provided as Attachment #1, the total forecast Estimate at Completion (EAC) for the WWTP Expansion Project is approximately $572.24 million, which is an increase of approximately $60,000 (EMID share:
approximately $14,000) from the last quarterly update.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Portions of Quarterly Progress Report – 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024
Attachment 2 – Wastewater Treatment Plant Site Plan
Attachment 3 – Construction Photographs
Attachment 4 – Project Financing

8.2 8.2 Staff Report

530

Progress Through: September 30, 2024

Quarterly Progress Report
San Mateo Clean
Water Program
for the
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Projects

3rd Quarter Report July 1, 2024
to September 30, 2024

Submitted on: October 21, 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

531

Active Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects
46T003 WWTP Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow
Management Upgrade
Project Description:

The WWTP Upgrade and Expansion Project will replace aging infrastructure, provide capacity for wet weather flows, comply with regulatory requirements, enhance reliability, and produce a higher quality effluent that meets current and future permit requirements and Title 22 recycled water quality. Producing a higher quality effluent will enable the City to develop a water reuse Program.

GMP3 – Contract
Contractor Sundt
Award Date 9/21/2020
Construction NTP 9/22/2020
Duration (calendar days) 1584
Contracted Completion Date 1/23/2025
Total Original Contract Amount $379,880,747.00
Revised Contract Amount $383,790,833.00
Original Contingency Amount $13,900,000.00
Revised Contingency Amount $38,986,910.00
Forecast Completion Date 10/23/2025
Current Contracted Amount $407,751,364.23
Actual Expended $378,195,689.71

Current Period Activities
Project/Construction Management

• Coordinating the Special Inspections Services
• Providing Construction Inspection Services
• Reviewing and recommending approval of change orders
• Administering the Consultant and Subconsultants contracts • Assisting with the Startup and Commissioning training of Plant Staff • Monthly WWTP update meeting with Foster City management team.

July through September 20 24 P A G E 10

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024
Project Inside
Project Manager Leswin DCunha
Project Type Wastewater System
Phase Construction

GMP1 – Contract
Contractor Sundt
Award Date 5/6/2019
Construction NTP 6/4/2019
Duration (calendar days) 1124
Contracted Completion Date 7/1/2022
Total Original Contract Amount $33,098,178.00
Contingency Amount $1,725,000.00
Substantial Completion Date 2/1/2023
Current Contracted Amount $34,783,550.00
Actual Expended $31,630,697.00

GMP2 – Contract
Contractor Sundt
Award Date 5/4/2020
Construction NTP 5/5/2020
Duration (calendar days) 619
Contracted Completion Date 01/14/2022
Total Original Contract Amount $17,716,049.00
Contingency Amount $1,645,000.00
Acceptance Date 3/6//2024
Current Contracted Amount $17,963,767.00
Actual Expended $17,206,534.00

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

532

Engineering Design/ Services During Construction
• Interpretive Signage -:Contractor is in the process of procuring the signage. • ESDC: HDR continued review of submittals and RFIs on GMP 3; development of design change notices; onsite and remote support by Resident Engineer. .HDR continuing the preparation of electronic Operations and Maintenance Manuals
Permitting:

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)

A/C 30448 (Liquid Processes)

Because the A/C renewal request has been submitted, the City can continue construction/operation under the conditions of the existing permit until a new A/C permit is issued.

A/C 30449 (Generators)

Because construction is complete and source test data submitted, the City does not need to renew the A/C. The Source Test data was approved 10/26/23. The next step, issue the Permit to Operate (P/O). In the interim, the City can operate the generators under the conditions of the A/C permit.

Public Outreach
• PM/CM and the CWP Public Outreach Lead coordinated on regular project updates to the website, newsletter, social media, etc.

Construction
GMP1
 Project close out is almost completed.

GMP-2
 Project is closed out and accepted.

GMP-3
 The contracted completion date for GMP3 has been adjusted to March 26,2025 to account for additional time to incorporate additional scope added for the back-up fuel system.

However, the City was informed by the contractor that the procurement of the electrical panels required for programming the SCADA have been impacted by the supply change issues as a result of the Covid pandemic, and the leak testing of the basins took longer than originally planned, the project end date is now projected to be October 2025. The Contractor and the City are working together to minimize the potential delays and reduce this potential completion date extension. The Contractor and the City are also discussing the responsibility of the Contractor in covering the increase in management costs as a result of this schedule change.
 Commissioning meetings were held to continue discussing start-up activities, including roles and responsibilities.
 Yard piping is complete except for final connection of the force mains to the Headworks schedule for January 2025.
 Continued to install Electrical (gear including cabinets, breakers, switches, conduit and wiring) and Mechanical Equipment (piping with structural supports, motors and pumps),53 (Bio- Actiflo), 55 (BNR) and 56 (MBR).

July through September 2024 P A G E 11

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

533

 Admin Building and Warehouse are pending final approval from Building and Fire Departments and completion of the final punch list items.
 Continued improvements to the existing Sodium Hypochlorite Day and Bulk Storage Tanks, and pumping systems.
 Continued improvements to the existing Sodium Bisulfite Tanks and Pumping system.  Continued improvements to the existing Chlorine Contact Basins.  Parcel Map Recorded April 11, 2024
Next Period Activities
Project/Construction Management
• HDR’s to continue to provide ESDC services including development of process O&M manuals, process training, expanded discipline-specific Resident Engineer services, and related known scope reflected in the contingency budget.

Engineering Design/Services During Construction
• ESDC: HDR to continue to provide onsite resident engineering services.

Permitting
• Coordination with Building and Fire Departments for Temporary Occupancy for Admin Building and Warehouse
Public Outreach
• Provide project updates to the CWP Public Outreach Lead for monthly newsletter, website, and social media updates.
• Continue as-needed support in response to resident queries via the communication hotline.

Construction
GMP-1
• Close out project
GMP-2
• Completed.

GMP-3
 Continue to install Electrical (gear including cabinets, breakers, switches, conduit and wiring) and Mechanical Equipment (piping with structural supports, motors and pumps) in Areas 53 (Bio-Actiflo), 55 (BNR) and 56 (MBR).
 Continue coordination with Building and Fire Department for Temporary Occupancy .for Admin. Building.

Work on final punch list items.
 Continue coordination with Building and Fire Department for Temporary Occupancy .for Warehouse. Work on final punch list items
 Continue the improvements to the existing Sodium Hypochlorite and Sodium Bisulfite systems.  Continue improvements to the Chlorine Contact Basins

July through September 2024 P A G E 12

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

534

Risks and Opportunities
• Cal Water’s New Potable Water Main Extension: Completed • PG&E’s New Primary Service: Completed
• Relocation of PG&E’s Utilities from Detroit Drive: Completed

Financial Status
 Current update shows an overrun ($39.53M) of original budget.

Millions

Budget $532.71

Actual Cost to date $19.952

Estimate at Completion $572.24

Schedule Status
 T he current forecast as of September 2024, shows project completion to be in October 2025.

July through September 2024 P A G E 13

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

535

46T009 IAP Package II
Project Description:

Replace and repair aging infrastructure at the WWTP by adding screening, flexibility, and redundancy for WWTP solids processes. The project includes: (1) Mechanical bar screen and repair of concrete wall at the IJB; (2) Effluent PS #1 pumping and piping improvements; (3) replace two of the oldest pumps in PS #1; (4) Cake pumping system: add second cake pumping system; and (5) Second cake hopper system: add a second cake hopper, slide gate, access walkway, and platform.

Current Period Activities
Project/Construction Management
• Coordinated City negotiations with Contractor for time extension / delays.
 Worked with Contractor on Cake pump issues.

Engineering Design/ Services During Construction
(Various)
• Stantec ESDC is ongoing through the remainder of its construction period.

Permitting
 No activities this period.

Public Outreach
 No activities this period.

Construction
Immediate Action Projects, Package II (IAP II)
 Replaced one of the mitered pipes and added pipe supports, Analyzing if additional measures to resolve the pressure issue are needed.
 Replaced Sensors in Hopper.
 Next Period Activities
Project/Construction Management
 Continued change management support.

Engineering Design and Engineering Services During Construction  Stantec ESDC is ongoing through the remainder of its construction period.  Continue review of submittals and RFI.

Permitting
 No activities this period.

July through September 2024 Page 35

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024
Project Inside
Project Manager Tyler Kirkendall
Project Type Wastewater System
Phase Construction
Design Firm Stantec, HDR

IAP II – Contract
Contractor Myers & Sons
Award Date 2/11/2019
Construction NTP 2/19/2019
Duration (calendar days) 848
Contracted Completion Date 6/14/2021
Contract Amount $6,340,000
Contingency Amount $1,144,000
Forecast Completion Date 1/21/2025
Current Contracted Amount $7,167,599
Actual Expended $7,142,099

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

536

Public Outreach
 No activities this period.

Construction
Immediate Action Projects, Package II (IAP II)
 Analyze if additional measures such as a polymer ring is needed in order to resolve the pressure issue.

Risks and Opportunities
 Sludge Cake Hopper No. 1 has not successfully completed start-up testing. Contractor working to identify issue affecting Cake Pump No. 1 and requested both design engineer and Vendor assistance in their troubleshooting of Cake Pump No. 1. Design Engineer provided new sludge cake measurement technology selection in DC 8, which was issued to the Contractor in September. City contracted with a third party to provide recommendations for fixing the Cake pump. The third party has recommended removal of welded pipe and installation of new piping. The contractor has replaced the miter welded pipe for one of the pumps and added pipe supports. Analysis is ongoing to determine if additional measures are needed.  Delays to the project by sludge cake pumping system will result in significant delays to the project.

Financial Status
 Current update shows an overrun ($5.73 M) of original budget.

Millions

Budget $13.02

Actual Cost to date $13.27

Estimate at
Completion

$18.68
Schedule Status
Project schedule temporary on hold while issues are being resolved. Anticipat es construction to be completed by April 14 , 2025

July through September 2024 P A G E 36

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

537

46T010 IAP Package III
Project Description:

Upgrade aging infrastructure and increase reliability for the effluent PS at the WWTP. Improvements include perform hydraulic analysis on the effluent PS and flow meters; replace MCCs P1, P2, P3, and P4 in the Main Structure Building; add variable-frequency drives (VFDs) and check valves on stormwater pumps; replace check valves (3) for dry weather pumps; replace MCCs/VFDs (4) and control panels (4) for dry weather pumps; and replace doors (3) and windows (10), repair roof, and add HVAC for the PS.

Current Period Activities
Project/Construction Management (Jacobs -Riva Mitra/Tanner Pacific)  Project Bid opened on April 6, 2023
 Project awarded to Mountain Cascade for $11,703,696
 EAC revised to $17,711,486.
 Project Management by Jacobs with assistance from the City  Construction Management by Tanner Pacific
Engineering Design/ Services During Construction (HDR)
 Review of Submittals and RFI’s
Construction
 Started construction of Site Waste Pump Station, Valve Vault and associated piping  Started construction of the Effluent Pump Station expansion and associated piping  Started replacements of the HVAC units in the Solids Handling Building  Started replacement of Digester 1 piping.
 Completed structural repairs of concrete in the Effluent Pump Station Building.  Completed Valve Replacement in the Effluent Pump Station Next Period Activities
Project/Construction Management (City/Tanner Pacific)
 Construction Management by Tanner Pacific.

Engineering Design/ Services During Construction
 HDR to continue EDSC.

Construction
 Continue construction of Site Waste Pump Station and Improvements to the Effluent Pump Station and associated piping
 Complete replacement of Digester 1 piping.
 Start connection to the Effluent Pump Station discharge piping  Complete the installation of the HVAC units in the Solids Handling B7uilding Risks and Opportunities
 Rescoping the project pushed out the completion date of the project.

July through September 2024 P A G E 39

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024
Project Inside
Project Manager TBD
Project Type Wastewater System
Phase Engineering

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

538

Financial Status
 The current update shows an overrun ($16.17 M) of the original budget. The original budget was an estimate to be used as a place holder that was set prior to having any knowledge of the project scope of work. The overall program carried a large contingency to compensate for this unknown and a portion of those contingencies are being used to offset this overrun. The current estimate is based on a defined scope of work. 

Budget
$2.47
million

Actual Cost to
date
$5.92
million

Estimate at
Completion

$18.64
million

Schedule Status
 Current forecast shows final completion in May 2025.

July through September 2024 P A G E 40

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

539

46T090 Annual Major Component WWTP
Project Description:

Maintain reliable plant operations to meet regulatory permit requirements and repair and replace critical WWTP
infrastructure. The operations and maintenance team maintain an active list of potential projects that are implemented as funds are available.

Current Period Activities
Project/Construction Management (Jacobs- Riva Mitra/ Tanner Pacific)  Jacobs to manage the Project Management with assistance from the City staff  AMC project
 Update WWTP Biosolids and Energy Management Plan – Selected Brown and Caldwell plan to award November 2024. Study to be completed late 2025.
 Digester 1 Improvements - waiting for biosolids report to be completed.  Centrifuge and Centrifuge Feed Pump Replacement - waiting for biosolids report to be completed.  Solids Handling Systems I&C Improvements - waiting for biosolids report to be completed.  Digester Transfer Pump Project – Awarded contractor currently procuring equipment. VFD’s will arrive in December 2024, Project completion March 2025.
 3 Water Pumping Improvements – design ongoing anticipated start of construction summer 2025.  DAFT Corrosion Improvements – Study to evaluate alternatives to repairing DAFT will be awarded to Carollo in October 2024.
 Digest 2 Mixer Repair/Replacement – SPX was awarded the repair of the mixer in September 2024. Mixer will take approximately 6 months to repair
Permitting (Various)
None
Construction
 Digester Transfer Pump Project was awarded in November 2023. The contractor is currently procuring equipment. Minor electrical work has started/ VFDs are scheduled to arrive in December 2024.

Next Period Activities
Project/Construction Management (City/ Tanner Pacific)
 Continue CM on the Digester Transfer Pump Project
Engineering Design/ Services During Construction
• Design Consultants providing EDSC for the Digester Transfer Pump project. • . Monthly WWTP update meeting with Foster City management team. for the AMC projects.

July through September 2024 P A G E 43

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024
Project Inside
Project Manager Riva Mitra
Project Type Wastewater System
Phase Engineering

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

540

Permitting
 None
Construction
 Continue the Construction on the Digester Transfer Pump project with the procurement of the VFDs Risks and Opportunities
 AMC 36 Centrifuge Conveyor Replacement is on hold.

Financial Status
 Project shows EAC over budget.by $4.23 million The original budget was an estimate to be used as a place holder that was set prior to having any knowledge of the project scope of work. The overall program carried a large contingency to compensate for this unknown and a portion of those contingencies are being used to offset this overrun. The current estimate is based on a defined scope of work. 

Millions

Budget $8.92

Actual Cost to date $1.91

Estimate at Completion $13.15

Schedule Status

 AMC 6 +23 was completed in November 2022.
 AMC Digester 2 Mixer Repair/Replace, Awarded to SPX in September 2024; will take approximately 6 months Digester 2 will be offline until the repair is completed.  AMC Digester Transfer Pump was awarded in November 2023 .Contractor has begun minor electrical work but VFDs will not arrive until December 2024. Scheduled to be co0mpleted in March 2025...  All other AMC projects are in the design or predesign phase.

July through September 2024 P A G E 44

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

541

Completed Projects

Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects
Updated to latest values from EDEN (January 2020)

Name

Start Date
Finish
Date

Actual Cost
469948: SCADA Immediate Projects: Phase 2 (IAP) 1/2/2015 11/25/2015 $1,524,717 469962: Short-Term MCC Replacement Project (IAP) 1/2/2015 11/25/2015 $49,628 469973: Secondary System: Immediate Projects: SCs 1-4 and return- activated sludge Pump Values (IAP)
1/2/2015 11/25/2015 $426,918
469975: Solids: Immediate Projects: GT 1&2 (IAP) 1/2/2015 11/25/2015 $372,358 469976: Immediate Projects: Boiler Replacement 1/2/2015 4/29/2016 $475,296 469978: Solids Building: Immediate. Projects: Centrifuge Hoist Project (IAP) 1/2/2015 11/25/2015 $2,410 46T002 IAP Package I 8/1/2018 8/28/19 $18,621,868
TOTAL $21,472,951

July through September 2024 P A G E 45

SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM

QUARTERLY REPORT
Q3 2024

8.2 Attachment 1 - Portions of Quarterly Progress Report - 3rd Quarter Report, July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024

542

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE PLAN
Attachment 2
Area 64
Area 52
Area 80
Area 51Area 51
Area 53
Area 55
Area 56

8.2 Attachment 2 - Wastewater Treatment Plant Site Plan

543

Area 51 Headworks Piping
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 14

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

544

Area 51 Preliminary Screens Area
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 15

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

545

Area 51 Electrical Room
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 1 6

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

546

Area 51 Dumpster Bay
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 1 7

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

547

Area 51 Grit Washers
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 18

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

548

Area 64 Odor Control Area
October 102024

July 5,2024

July through September 2024 PAGE 19

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

549

Area 52 Primary Clarifiers
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through Septembe r 2024 P A G E 20

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

550

Area 52 Preliminary Effluent Pump Station Piping
October 10,2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 P A G E 21

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

551

View Inside the Electrical Room for Area 56
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 22

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

552

View inside the Membrane Permeate Pump Room Area 56
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 23

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

553

Area 56 MBR Cartridge Trains
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 24

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

554

Area 56 Blowers Room
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 25

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

555

View of Area 80 – Ongoing Work
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 26

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

556

Area 80 Admin Building Exterior North elevation.

October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 27

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

557

East Elevation
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 28

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

558

Area 80 Admin. Bldg. - South Elevation
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 29

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

559

Area 80 Admin. Bldg. - Operations Control Room
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 30

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

560

Area 80 Admin. Bldg. Laboratory
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 31

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

561

Reception Area
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 32

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

562

View of the Warehouse
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 33

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

563

Interior of the Warehouse
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 Page 34

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

564

IAP2
Hopper
October 10,2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 P A G E 37

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

565

Piping
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 P A G E 38

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

566

IAP3
Site Waste Station Site
October 10, 2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 P A G E 41

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

567

Effluent Pump Station Site- Drilling Wet Well
October 10,2024

July 5, 2024

July through September 2024 P A G E 42

8.2 Attachment 3 - Construction Photographs

568

ATTACHMENT #4

PROJECT FINANCING

In addition to cash from the District’s and City of San Mateo’s wastewater enterprises, financing for the project consists of the following funding sources:

Revenue Bonds – The San Mateo Foster City Public Financing Authority (“PFA”) sold $270 million in revenue bonds in 2019 for Clean Water Program costs. The District’s share of the proceeds from that bond issue was $40,131,000. The WWTP 2019 bond funds were fully expended in July 2021.

The Program through the San Mateo-Foster City PFA is obtaining additional financing through the two programs as described below:

Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) - The PFA approved the close of the WIFIA loan in November 2020 in the total amount of $277.2 million (San Mateo share is $210.4 million and EMID share is $67.8 million). The WIFIA loan has excellent rates (1.32% for San Mateo and 1.14% for EMID). We have until 8/1/25 to start drawing on the WIFIA loan.

2021 Wastewater Revenue Notes, Series A (Estero Municipal Improvement District) - On July 1, 2021, the San Mateo-Foster City PFA issued $62.76 million of 2021 Wastewater Revenue Notes, Series A (EMID) to attain a cost savings (from lower interest rates than the WIFIA loan) of approximately $1.1 million for the financing of EMID’s share of WWTP project costs. These notes have a maturity date of 8/1/25 when the City will draw on the WIFIA Loan to pay off the notes.

State Revolving Fund (SRF) –The SRF loan package, for a maximum loan amount of $137,000,000, was approved by the State with an interest rate not to exceed

1.6% (EMID’s share of the loan is $33,044,400). These funds are now available as part of the financial strategy for the project.

8.2 Attachment 4 - Project Financing

569

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153268
153269
153270
153271
153272

AAA BUSINESS SUPPLIES & INTERIORS

ABDUL HAKEEM
OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.80
189.00CLASS REFUND: MULTI-SPORT TOTS
INSTRUCTOR FEE: AFTER SCHOOL HOOPS

DRINKING WATER
AFTER SCHOOL HOOPS 5,564.63
141.83ALHAMBRA & SIERRA SPRINGS
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. AMAZON BUSINESS PRIME MEMBERSHIP FEE,

MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - PARKS AND VEHICLE

PROGRAM
1,254.12
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153273
153274
ANIMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.

APPLIANCE PARTS DISTRIBUTORS
GROUND SQUIRREL CONTROL 350.00
ALL IN ONE WASHER/DRYER FOR 501 PILGRIM #213 AND
ELECTRIC STOVE FOR 501 PILGRIM #211
2,461.98
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153275
153276
153277
153278
AT&T MOBILITY CELLULAR SERVICES - POLICE CARS 528.35
3,830.39
430.91

B&H PHOTO-VIDEO PANASONIC CAMERA FOR FCTV UPGRADE PROJECT

CITATION AMENDMENTS FORMSBANNER PRINTING & BUSINESS FORMS BARKER BLUE DIGITAL IMAGING ADVERTISEMENT FOR REBID - CIP695: LIFT STATION 59

EFFLUENT LINE IMPROVEMENTS
531.54
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153279
153280

BAY REPROGRAPHIC & SUPPLY INC

BKF ENGINEERS
HEAVYWEIGHT PRINTER PAPER 476.37
CIP635: MEDIAN MODIFICATIONS AT FOSTER CITY BLVD
& CHESS DR - ENGINEERING SERVICES: JULY 29, 2024 -
AUGUST 25, 2024 AND CIP716: STREET REHABILITATION

AND PARK PATHWAY - MASTER ENGINEERING
SERVICES: AUGUST 26, 2024 - SEPTEMBER 29, 2024
30, 2024
7,349.25
10/30/2024 153281 BLANKINSHIP & ASSOCIATES, INC. WATER QUALITY CONSULTING SERVICES: SEPTEMBER 1,341.25 2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153282
153283
BRONISLAV SLEPNYOV PLANNING DEPOSIT REFUND 492.50
BUBBA'S FIRE EXTINGUISHER COMPANY FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 2,732.00

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

570

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024 153284 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP CIP657: LEVEE PROTECTION PLANNING & 4,717.50 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND CIP678: RECREATION

CENTER PROJECT SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES: AUGUST 2024
10/30/2024 153285 CAL-WEST LIGHTING & SIGNAL MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHT, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR
13,114.29
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153286
153287

CALIFORNIA WATER EFFICIENCY PARTNERSHIP

CAUSEY CONSULTING
CALWEP MEMBERSHIP DUES 3,330.00
760.80SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN AUDIT

PREPARATION
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153288
153289
153290
CHEMSEARCH ECOFLOW BIOAMP TREATMENT FOR LIFT STATIONS 2,069.76 598.58
900.00

CINTAS CORPORATION

CITY OF LOS ANGELES

UNIFORM/LAUNDRY SERVICES
POST TRAINING REGISTRATION FOR 1 POLICE

EMPLOYEE
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153291
153292

CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STOCKTON INC

CODE FOR FUN
PEST AWAY SERVICES 1,260.00
196.00INSTRUCTOR FEE: HTML HEROES - DESIGN YOUR

WEBSITE
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153293
153294
CODE PUBLISHING, LLC MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 188.00
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA INC CIP660: WATER TANK IMPROVEMENTS AND CIP690:

SEISMIC IMPROVEMENTS AT LAGOON PUMP STATION -
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: JULY 2024 & AUGUST 2024
40,083.65
10/30/2024 153295 CONTRA COSTA CO. SHERIFF'S OFFICE POST TRAINING REGISTRATION FOR 1 POLICE

EMPLOYEE
529.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153296
153297

CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES

CORE & MAIN LP
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES - SEPTEMBER 2024 10,500.00
10,472.66MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - STREET, LAGOON, AND

WATER PROGRAM
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153298
153299
153300

CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC
CREATIVE SECURITY COMPANY INC.

CS NOW INC
OFF-SITE RECORDS STORAGE 135.51
1,946.84
1,065.40

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
INSTRUCTOR FEE: CREATE & LEARN

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

571

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024 153301 CSG CONSULTANTS INC. CIP716: ST REHAB & PARK PATH - CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES, D548 551-581 FOSTER CITY BLVD, D561
GILEAD NRC - 331 LAKESIDE, D548 FAMILY DENTAL,
GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW, CIP705:
50,618.50
EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENT, CIP704:

WATER METER REPLACEMENT - PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES: AUGUST 31, 2024 - SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153302
153303

CUMMINS SALES & SERVICE
CWEA
IRRIGATION PUMPS MAINTENANCE SERVICE 4,718.19
801.00CERTIFICATION & MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FOR PUBLIC

WORKS EMPLOYEES
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153304
153305
CYGNET ENTERPRISES INC. POND DYE FOR LAGOON MANAGEMENT 5,750.24 1,417.07DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION NOTICE OF NOMINEES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE ELECTION:

FILIPINO AND SPANISH TRANSLATION
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153306
153307
DAVID ORLANDO EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT: POST MANAGEMENT
COURSE MODULE C: 9/29/24 - 10/3/24 AND SUNRIDGE
CONFERENCE: 10/6/24-10/11/24
2,699.08
7,500.00DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS CONSULTING SERVICES: SEPTEMBER 2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153308
153309
DOUGLAS NIX POST TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT 42.08
EARL'S PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL - 501 PILGRIM 325.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153310
153311

EFUEL, LLC
ERLER & KALINOWSKI, INC.

FUEL POLISHING FOR LIFT STATIONS
CIP652: WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAN MASTER PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS - ENGINEERING OVERSIGHT:

SEPTEMBER 2024
8,906.45
2,300.48
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153312
153313
153314

ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

EVERON LLC
WATER SERVICES: SEPTEMBER 2024 122,495.04

42.66DOOR LOCKS/HARDWARE

EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS & IRRIGATION SUPPLIES -

PARKS PROGRAM
1,680.47
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153315
153316
153317

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC

ROGER FISHER
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - SEWER PROGRAM 6,029.84
646.00RESERVE OFFICER PAY
FOLGERGRAPHICS ACTIVITY GUIDE - WINTER 2025 3,828.13

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

572

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153318
153319
FORELAND PARTS INC.

FOSTER CITY ISLANDER
AUTO PARTS 277.94
ADVERTISEMENT: NOTICE OF NOMINEES FOR PUBLIC
OFFICE AND FILING DEADLINES FOR ARGUMENTS;
RZ2024-0010, AR2023-0004, AR2024-0030, UP2024-0012,
RZ2024-0010, AND RZ2024-0012
1,815.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153320
153321
FREYER & LAURETA, INC. CIP705: EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLACEMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES: AUGUST 2024
CIP716: STREET REHAB AND PARK PATHWAY
RESTORATION - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES:

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 - OCTOBER 5, 2024
1,871.00
G. BORTOLOTTO & COMPANY, INC. 697,992.22
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153322
153323
153324
153325
153326

GARDENLAND POWER EQUIPMENT

GP CRANE & HOIST SERVICES

GRAINGER
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - VEHICLE PROGRAM 58.60
424.95CAL/OSHA CRANES SERVICES

MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - STREET PROGRAM

MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - STREET PROGRAM
467.74

GRANITE ROCK COMPANY

GREENTECH LANDSCAPE SERVICES
868.43
WORKFORCE HOUSING LANDSCAPING SERVICES: JULY
2024 - OCTOBER 2024
3,000.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153327
153328
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES: CIP678 - RECREATION CENTER REPLACEMENT PROJECT:

SEPTEMBER 2024
36,258.95
35,736.83GROUP4 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH +PLAN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES: CIP678 - RECREATION CENTER REPLACEMENT PROJECT:

SEPTEMBER 2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153329
153330
153331

HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE

HIP HOUSING AFFORDABLE VENTURES INC

HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
BLANK KEYS AND BIRD SPIKES FOR 501 PILGRIM 369.47

76.35MATERIALS REIMBURSEMENT - 501 PILGRIM

MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL & SUPPLIES - PARKS,

BUILDING, VEHICLE, SEWER, STREETS & WATER

PROGRAMS
5,932.74
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153332
153333
153334
IT'S PERSONNEL P.C.

JANEL LAO
HR SUPPORT - AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2024 350.00
453.00
453.00
CLASS REFUND: BAKING 101
CLASS REFUND: BAKING 101JESSICA BESSLER

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

573

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153335
153336
153337
153338
153339
JOY MAO SYNTHETIC TURF REBATE 5,000.00
23,406.00

42.08 JULIO CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES

KATHERINE PEREZ
JANITORIAL SERVICES: OCTOBER 2024

POST TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT
KOCREATION DESIGN LLC INSTRUCTOR FEE: ARTS AND CRAFTS FOR STEM 354.00 LORAL LANDSCAPING INC. LANDSCAPE, MEDIANS AND EASEMENTS MAINTENANCE FEE: OCTOBER 2024
19,032.62
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153340
153341
153342
153343
LORI SU VISION REIMBURSEMENT 200.00
116.15LOUIS MEDINA POST TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT
LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS, INC.

MANITO CONSTRUCTION, INC.

LANDSCAPE MATERIALS - PARKS PROGRAM 222.91
CIP660: WATER TANK IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES: SEPTEMBER 2024
272,620.55
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153344
153345
153346
153347
MARK LEE POST TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT 806.78
265.00MCCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL, INC

MCMASTER-CARR

WATER TESTING
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - LAGOON PROGRAM 2,607.47
1,660.90MISSION CLOUD SERVICES, INC CALOPPS SUPPORT - AMAZON WEB SERVICES:

SEPTEMBER 2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153348
153349

MISSION LINEN SUPPLY-UNIFORM

MUNICIPAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC
LAUNDRY SERVICES 663.72

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFFING NEEDS

ASSESSMENT
1,690.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153350
153351
153352
153353
153354
153355
153356
153357
NBC SUPPLY CORP LATEX EXAM GLOVES 2,953.13

71.93OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES
OGAWA-MUNE INC PLANT MATERIALS 1,195.11
2,192.01
2,820.00
5,532.98
135,299.55

28.18 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

PACIFIC AUXILIARY FIRE ALARM COMPANY

PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
PBM SUPPLY & MFG, INC.

ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE: 10/1/2024 - 12/31/2024

FIRE ALARM INSPECTION

FLOOR SCRUBBER FOR BUILDING PROGRAM

ELECTRICITY & GAS

PARTS FOR EQUIPMENT REPAIR

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

574

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024 153358 PEN MEDIA CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS VIDEO SERVICES: JULY & AUGUST 2024

ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRES
4,584.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153359
153360
153361
153362
153363
153364
153365
153366
153367
PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS ASSOC.

PREFERRED ALLIANCE
784.00
290.07"DOT" COMPLIANCE EXPENSES - SEPTEMBER 2024

TOWEL/UNIFORM LAUNDRY SERVICESPRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY

RAVI TEJA BODDU
307.70
CLASS REFUND: MULTI-SPORT STEM & PLAY

COMMERCIAL WASTE & ORGANICS
199.00

RECOLOGY SAN MATEO COUNTY
RIGHT ON CONSTRUCTION, INC.

SFPUC - WATER
612.75

HANDICAP RAMP WORK ON BEACH PARK BLVD
WATER PURCHASE: 09/13/24 - 10/10/24
5,400.00
1,010,430.38
1,203.70
246.76

SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER'S OFFICE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
PARKING CITATION PROCESSING - SEPTEMBER 2024

CA LAW ENFORCEMENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEM ACCESS - AUGUST 2024
10/30/2024 153368 SAN MATEO CONSOLIDATED FIRE DEPARTMENT

SAN MATEO COUNTY

FIRE PLAN REVIEW FEES COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF
SMC FIRE - SEPTEMBER 2024
MOSQUITO ABATEMENT SERVICES - SEPTEMBER 2024
7,838.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153369
153370
4,912.30
1,500.00SAN MATEO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING

DEPARTMENT

SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP

SFO AIRPORT/COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION -
ROUNDTABLE OPERATING FUND FY24/25

MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - VEHICLE AND PARKS

PROGRAM
10/30/2024 153371 2,769.76
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153372
153373
153374
153375
153376
153377
SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS INC.

SERVICE PRESS INC.

LOCKS AND KEYS 981.14
305.21
205.00
871.50
658.00
2,115.50

BUSINESS CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLASS REFUND: INDIAN FUSION DANCE

MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS FOR PARKS

FINGERPRINTING SERVICES

SHAMMI PEREIRA
SPEEDPRO IMAGING OF S.F. PENINSULA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING

ASSOCIATES

RADIO EQUIPMENT FEES
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153378
153379
THE CONSULTING TEAM, LLC MANAGEMENT TEAM TRAINING 10/9/24: BUILDING TRUST PAINT
2,000.00
901.55THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

575

Prepared Date 10/30/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 14
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/30/2024 153380 THERMAL MECHANICAL INC. HVAC SYSTEM PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND PARTS
5,006.96
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153381
153382
153383
153384
TIFCO INDUSTRIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES - VEHICLE PROGRAM 567.89 900.20
209.00

TOWNE FORD SALES

HENRY TRUONG

AUTO PARTS

RESERVE OFFICER PAY
TRUSTED GEAR COMPANY LLC WINTER JACKETS FOR PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 599.80 10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153385
153386
TURBO DATA SYSTEM, INC.

VERDE DESIGN INC
CITATION PROCESSING - SEPTEMBER 2024 125.54
CIP712: EDGEWATER SYNTHETIC TURF RESURFACING -
BID SUPPORT AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN SERVICES:

AUGUST 26, 2024 - SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
3,230.00
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
10/30/2024
153387
153388
153389
153390
153391

VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY

WE GO LOGO
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 4,554.83
2,553.68
3,360.17
491.40

CIVICS ACADEMY GRADUATION PRESENT
LIFT STATION #674 DEGREASER
INSTRUCTOR FEE: SOCCER

WINZER CORPORATION

WORLD CUP SOCCER CAMPS & CLINICS
WRT CIP682: PARKS SYSTEM MASTER PLAN - CONSULTING
SERVICES: SEPTEMBER 2024
25,897.08
10/30/2024 153392 4LEAF, INC. BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES: JULY & AUGUST 2024 41,300.00 2,742,506.30
Submitted for Information:
____________________________________________
Waqas Hassan, Assistant Finance Director
(For Edmund Suen, City Treasurer)
CHECKS ON THIS REGISTER PROCESSED AND MAILED ON OCTOBER 30, 2024

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 14 - October 30, 2024

576

Prepared Date 10/14/2024 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register

Accounting Period 2025/4
Report Number 13
Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Description Check Amount 10/24/2024 153267 KAITLYN ELIZABETH SCRIBNER SETTLEMENT 10,000.00 10,000.00
Submitted for Information:
____________________________________________
Waqas Hassan, Assistant Finance Director
(For Edmund Suen, City Treasurer)
CHECKS ON THIS REGISTER PROCESSED AND MAILED ON OCTOBER 24, 2024

9.1 Warrant Register Report FY 2024-2025 Number 13 - October 24, 2024

577