CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
1 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
2 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
3 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
4 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
5 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
620 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER CITY, CALIFORNIA
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO ATTEND AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING MAY DO SO IN PERSON OR BY JOINING THE ZOOM MEETING HTTPS://FOSTERCITY ORG.ZOOM.US/J/82592136594 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND VIA ZOOM MEETING. ANY EMAILS SENT TO [email protected] WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: 620 Foster City Blvd, Foster City, California, 94404 To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a Request to Speak Form. Forms will be accepted until the staff presentation on an agenda item ends, or until the public comment period on non agenda items is closed. For special meetings, public comment is limited to item(s) on the agenda only.
To Observe the Meeting via Teleconference/Video Conference:
To access the meeting by computer / smartphone, go to: https://fostercityorg.zoom.us/j/82592136594 To dialin via phone:
16694449171 or
14086380968
And enter Webinar ID: 825 9213 6594
To Participate in the Meeting by Providing Public Comment via Teleconference/Video Conference:
During the Meeting: Live verbal public comments may be made by members of the public joining the meeting via Zoom. Zoom access information is provided above. Use the “raise hand” feature (for those joining by phone, press *9 to “raise hand”) during the public comment period for the agenda item you wish to address. The Zoom Host will call on people to speak by name provided or last 4 digits of phone number for dialin attendees. Please clearly state your full name for the record at the start of your public comment.
Before the Meeting: Written public comments for the record may be submitted in advance by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by email to: [email protected] and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda Include the submitter’s full name (Recommended but not required) Written public comments received by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided in their entirety to the City Council prior to the meeting and will be made part of the written record but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
Written public comments will be posted to the City’s website for review prior to the meeting.
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2025 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AS CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.1. Proclamation Honoring the Life and Service of Dan Lee
4.2. A Proclamation Recognizing April 2025 as “Parkinson’s Awareness Month”
5. PUBLIC
Government Code Section 54954.2 E (3) precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during the “Public” portion of the agenda.
Information may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the appropriate City staff. FCMC 2.08.240 Addressing the Council. "...Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the public rostrum after being recognized to speak by the presiding officer, shall state his/her name and address for the record, state the subject he/she wishes to discuss, state who he/she is representing if he/she represents an organization or other persons and, unless further time is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his/her remarks to three minutes. The City Council may vary the time limit for any speaker, if it deems this necessary." Speakers may join the Zoom meeting via the meeting link and using the “raise hand” feature and the Zoom host will call on people.
6. CITY/EMID CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council/EMID Board of Directors and will be enacted by one motion unless removed by a member of the Council/Board, staff, or public. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a citizen or a Council/Board member so requests.
This section includes minutes, ordinances for adoption, resolutions for adoption, and other business as needed. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately after approval of the remaining items on the Consent Calendar. Vote may be by roll call.
6.1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2025
6.2. City/EMID Regular Meeting and FCJPA Special Meeting Minutes of April 7, 2025
6.3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Renewing Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et. Seq. and Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy a) Staff Report
b) Adopt Resolution
6.4. Foster City Council Liaisons List Dated April 21, 2025 a) Action – By Minute Order, Approve List
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.1. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments Regarding Revisions to the City/District Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 20252026
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526 f) Action – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Amending the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 202526
7.2. A Public Hearing to Hear and Consider Comments and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, Anti Displacement Strategy and Program HG2E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant To CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
a) Staff Report
b) Open Public Hearing
c) Receive Public Testimony
d) Close Public Hearing
e) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to Add New Sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and
17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to Implement Housing Element Program HC3B, AntiDisplacement Strategy and Program HG2 E, Rental Registry, and Finding Ordinance Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)
i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Consideration of Amendment to Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Foster City Municipal Code and Amending the City’s Purchasing Policy
a) Staff Report
b) Action – An Ordinance of the City of Foster City Amending Section
3.04.080, “Formal Bid Procedures for Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized Purchasing Alternatives for Supplies, Services and Equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of Professional Services”; and Section 3.04.170 “Public ProjectsDefinitions” of Chapter 3.04, “Purchasing System,” within Title 3, of the Foster City Municipal Code to Make Administrative Revisions to the City’s Purchasing System i) Introduce Ordinance by title only, by motion waive further reading ii) By motion, pass ordinance to second reading
c) Action A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving an Amendment to the City’s Purchasing Policy Related to Contract Awards and Administrative Changes
9. REPORTS
9.1. Recreation Center Rebuild Project (CIP 301678) Project Update a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept Report
9.2. Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Implementation Plan Update and Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
a) Staff Report
b) Action – By Minute Order, Receive and Accept and Provide Policy Direction Regarding Responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan
10. COMMUNICATIONS
10.1. City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 27, 2025
a) Information Item Only
b) No Action Required
11. CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
City/District Manager and Council/EMID Board Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council/EMID Board requests for scheduling future items.
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: Diane Pitman and Austris Rungis Employee Organization: POA and Management Group
12.2. Report Out from Closed Session
13. ADJOURNMENT
The public is invited to attend.
Any attendee wishing special accommodations at the meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Department at (650) 2863250 or [email protected] at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The City has a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and resolving any doubt in favor of accessibility.
That procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation is available at the City Clerk’s Office. All meetings are conducted in a manner consistent with applicable civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council or EMID Board regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda packet was distributed will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk Department at City Hall located at 610 Foster City Boulevard during normal business hours and at the meeting.
City Council meetings on FCTV on Comcast Channel 27 and AT&T Channel 99:
LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
REPLAY next day at 1:00 pm (that week only)
REPLAY Saturday at 5:00 pm (only on Saturday the week the actual meeting occurs) City Council meetings on https://www.fostercity.org/community/page/fctvlivestream:
STREAMED LIVE every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month
City Council meetings ondemand:
https://www.fostercity.org/agendasandminutes
6 4.1
4.1 Proclamation
7 4.2
4.2 Proclamation
8 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 24, 2025
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER OF CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The duly called and noticed Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Foster City sitting as said Council and as ex officio the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) of March 24, 2025 was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor/President Jimenez.
ROLL CALL
The Deputy City Clerk called the roll:
PRESENT: Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President Stacy Jimenez.
ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Stefan Chatwin, City/District Manager; Benjamin Stock, City Attorney/District Legal Counsel; Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City/District Manager; Cory Call, Police Chief; Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director; Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director; Nate Cruz, Finance Director; Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director; Rob Lasky, IT Manager; Dawud Brewer, Human Resources Manager; Yelena Capello, Management Analyst; Kurt Zander, Building and Vehicles Maintenance Manager; ‘Andra Lorenz, Principal Management Analyst; Francine Magno, Senior Civil Engineer; Ryan Marquez, Senior Civil Engineer; Justin Lai, Senior Civil Engineer; Zaheed Danish, Public Works Superintendent; Maricar Dupaya, Principal Management Analyst; Chuck Venook, Chief Building Official; Shuli Chen, Video Technician; and Katherine Estrada, Deputy City Clerk.
STUDY SESSION
Mayor/President Jimenez recessed the meeting into Study Session for the following:
1. Five Year Capital Improvement Program FY 2025-2026 to FY 2029-2030;
6.1 6.1 Minutes
9 2. Fifteen Year General Fund Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding Plan for the Preparation of the City’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget and Five-Year Financial Plan;
3. Fifteen Year Water and Wastewater Funds Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding Plan for the Preparation of the District’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget and Five-Year Financial Plan;
4. Review of Projected Water Rates for FY 2025-2026 to FY 2029-2030 and Policy Direction for Rate Notification Under Proposition 218 and AB 2257;
5. Review of Projected Wastewater Rates for FY 2025-2026 to FY 2029-2030 and Policy Direction for Rate Notification Under Proposition 218 and AB 2257;
6. Updates To Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 2025-2026;
7. Internal Service Funds Summary;
8. Equipment Replacement Fund and Internal Service Fund Allocations for FY 2025- 2026;
9. Vehicle Replacement Fund Overview and Internal Service Fund Allocations for FY 2025-2026;
10.Building Maintenance Fund Budget and Internal Service Charges for FY 2025- 2026;
11.Longevity Recognition Benefits Plan and Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) Benefits Plan Internal Service Funds;
12.Compensated Absences Internal Service Fund;
13.Self-Insurance Fund Budget for FY 2025-2026; and
14.Information Technology Internal Service Fund Budget for FY 2025-2026.
By consensus of the City Council/EMID Board, direction was given regarding the preparation of the FY 2025-2026 Annual Budget for the following:
1. Proceed with the proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Program – FY 2025- 2026 to FY 2029-2030 and authorize staff to include the program in the FY 2024- 2025 budget;
2. Proceed with the proposed Fifteen Year General Fund CIP and Funding Plan that includes $5 million of annual transfers from the General Fund to the City Capital Fund for FY 2025-2026 through FY 2031-2032;
3. Proceed with the Fifteen-Year Water and Wastewater Funds CIP and Funding Plan that includes annual transfers from the Water Operating Fund to the Water CIP Fund of $2.6 million in years 1 and 2, followed by $2.5 million in years 3 and 4, $1.75 million in year 5, then leveling off at $1.5 million for the remaining 10 years of the 15-year plan and annual transfers from the Wastewater CIP Fund of $16.0 million for in year 1, $3.5 million annually for six years and leveling off at $2.5 million for the remaining 8 years of the 15-year CIP Plan for the preparation of the Enterprise Funds’ Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget and Five-Year Financial Plan as presented;
4. Proceed with the water rate adoption based on the Draft Water Rate Study Update Results Memo dated March 19, 2025 prepared by Bartle Wells Associates.
Approve the proposed Rate Setting Procedures. Proceed with the distribution of public noticing to all ratepayers as required by Proposition 218 and AB 2257 for a
6.1 6.1 Minutes
10 Public Hearing to be held on June 2, 2025, regarding Water Rates for FY 2025- 2026 to FY 2029-2030;
5. Proceed with the wastewater rates based on the Draft Wastewater Rate Study Update Results Memo dated March 11, 2025 prepared by Bartle Wells Associates (BWA). Approve the proposed Rate Setting Procedures. Proceed with the distribution of public noticing to all rate payers under the requirements of Proposition 218 and AB 2257 for a public hearing to be held on June 2, 2025, regarding Wastewater Rates for FY 2025-2026 to FY 2029-2030;
6. Proceed with adopting the recommended changes and updates to the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for the FY 2025-2026 budget;
7. Proceed with the reserve levels policy and funding methodologies for all Internal Services Funds for the preparation of the FY 2025-2026 budget;
8. Proceed with preparing the Equipment Replacement Fund budget for FY 2025- 2026 based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report and removing the replacement for the Council Chambers dais chairs;
9. Proceed with preparing the Vehicle Replacement Internal Service Fund budget for FY 2025-26 based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;
10.Proceed with preparing the Building Maintenance Internal Service Fund budget for FY 2025-2026 based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;
11.Proceed with preparing the Longevity Recognition Benefits Plan and Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) Benefits Plan based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report;
12.Proceed with increasing the current rate of 2.11% to 2.33% in FY 2025-2026 for the Compensated Absence Internal Service Fund (CA ISF) to maintain a full reserve balance through FY 2025-2026. Proceed with providing an assessment holiday in FY 2025-2026;
13.Proceed with preparing the Self Insurance Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report; and
14.Proceed with preparing the Information Technology Fund budget based on the recommendations and allocations contained in the staff report.
Meeting recessed into study session at 6:34 p.m. and reconvened at 8:57 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no objection from the City Council/EMID Board, Mayor/President Jimenez adjourned the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
6.1 6.1 Minutes
11 CITY OF FOSTER CITY/
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 7, 2025
FOSTER CITY JOINT POWERS AUTHOURITY
SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 2025
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER OF CITY COUNCIL/EMID BOARD OF DIRECTORS/FOSTER CITY
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Regular Meeting of April 7, 2025 of the City Council of the City of Foster City, sitting as said Council and as ex officio the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID), and Special Meeting of April 7, 2025 of the Foster City Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor/President/Chair Stacy Jimenez.
This meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.
ROLL CALL
The Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary/Recording Secretary called the roll:
PRESENT: Councilmembers/ex officio EMID Directors/FCJPA Directors Art Kiesel, Suzy Niederhofer, Patrick Sullivan, Phoebe Venkat, and Mayor/President/Chair Stacy Jimenez.
ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Stefan Chatwin, City/District Manager/Executive Director; Denise Bazzano, Assistant City Attorney/District Legal Counsel/General Counsel; Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City/District Manager; Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director; Sofia Mangalam,
Community Development Director; William Sandri, Police Captain; Nate Cruz, Finance Director/Treasurer; Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director; Dawud Brewer, Human Resources
Manager; Nori Jabba, Housing Coordinator; Rob Lasky, IT Manager; Kristina Muratori, Dispatch Supervisor; Daniel Weber, Parks Lead Maintenance Worker; Katherine Estrada, Deputy City Clerk; Shuli Chen, Video Technician; and Priscilla Schaus, Communications Director/City Clerk/District Secretary/Recording Secretary.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6.2 6.2 Minutes
12 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 13-19, 2025 AS “NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEEK”.
Vice Mayor Kiesel presented the Proclamation declaring the week of April 13-19, 2025 as “National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week” to Dispatch Supervisor Kristina Muratori.
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 20-26, 2025 AS “NATIONAL VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION WEEK”.
Councilmember Niederhofer presented the Proclamation declaring the week of April 20- 26, 2025 as “National Volunteer Appreciation Week” to Police Volunteer Matthew Pangalos.
PRESENTATION BY ONESHORELINE CEO LEN MATERMAN REGARDING SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD AND SEA LEVEL RISE RESILIENCY DISTRICT.
OneShoreline CEO Len Materman gave the presentation regarding OneShoreline.
PUBLIC
Evan Adams addressed the City Council via email regarding the US 101/SR 92 Direct Connector Project.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember/Director/Director Niederhofer, seconded by Vice Mayor/Vice President/Vice Chair Kiesel, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, approving the following items on the City/District/Authority Consent Calendar:
City/EMID Consent Calendar
1. City/EMID Special Meeting Minutes of March 10, 2025;
2. City/EMID Regular Meeting Minutes of March 17, 2025;
3. City Resolution No.2025-18, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Contract Amendment No. One (1) to Extend the Term an Additional Year (From May 1, 2025 to April 30, 2026) for an Amount Not to Exceed $35,000 With Pen Media, LLC for Video Technician Services;”
4. City Resolution No. 2025-19, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Contract Amendment No. One (1) in the Amount Of $75,000 with 4LEAF Inc. for On-Call Building Services;”
5. EMID Resolution No. 3795, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing the President to Execute Contract Amendment No. One (1) to the Vendor Agreement with Bay City Electric Works in the Amount of $127,978 for the Emergency Generator Replacements Project (CIP 455-705); and Finding Project Exempt from Review Under the California
6.2 6.2 Minutes
13 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15032 (Class 2-Existing Facilities);”
6. City Resolution No.2025-20, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Memorandum of Understanding of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829;”
7. EMID Resolution No. 3796, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving the Memorandum of Understanding for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829;”
8. City Resolution No.2025-21, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund;”
9. EMID Resolution No.3797, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund”; and
10.Foster City Joint Powers Authority Resolution No. 2025-01, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Foster City Joint Powers Authority Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund.”
Daniel Weber, AFSCME Council 57, Local 829 President, addressed the City Council in person regarding “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Memorandum of Understanding of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829” and “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving the Memorandum of Understanding for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829.”
Ryan Shannon, AFSCME Council 57 representative, addressed the City Council via teleconference regarding “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Approving the Memorandum of Understanding of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829” and “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District Approving the Memorandum of Understanding for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 57, Local 829.”
RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTIONS
AUTHORIZE (1) SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $35,000 TO ACCOUNT 124- 0832-463-4297 FOR THE MEASURE K EMERGENCY RENT RELIEF PILOT PROGRAM; (2) THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT FUNDS FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; AND (3) FIND
THE REQUEST EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3). CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2025-22.
Housing Coordinator Jabba presented the staff report.
6.2 6.2 Minutes
14 Discussion ensued.
Motion by Councilmember Sullivan, seconded by Councilmember Venkat, and carried unanimously, 5-0-0, adopting City Resolution 2025-22, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City Authorizing (1) Supplemental Appropriation of $35,000 to Account 124-0832-463-4297 for the Measure K Emergency Rent Relief Pilot Program; (2) the City Manager to Accept Funds for Reimbursement of Program Expenditures from the County of San Mateo; and (3) Find the Request Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3).”
COMMUNICATIONS
CITY/DISTRICT WARRANT OF DEMANDS. NO ACTION TAKEN.
City/District Warrants of Demands were Processed and Issued on March 5, 2025, March 13, 2025, March 18, 2025, and ACH were processed on March 5, 2025.
CITY/DISTRICT MANAGER REPORTS, COUNCIL/BOARD STATEMENTS AND
REQUESTS, AND COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
Councilmember/Director Venkat stated she attended the NAACP San Mateo 99th Anniversary Celebration & Freedom Fund Gala held in Foster City on March 23. On March 27, she attended the San Mateo-Foster City School District Board meeting where they discussed workforce housing and also attended their online study session regarding early language and literacy.
Councilmember/Director Sullivan stated he attended the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) meeting and San Mateo Union High School District Board meeting on March 27.
Councilmember/Director Niederhofer stated she attended the SFO Airport/Community Roundtable meeting on April 2, and suggested the public visit https://sforoundtable.org to learn more through their informational videos. She commended the City and the Foster City Rotary Club for recently repurposing one of the City’s playground structures and reinstalling it in the Hoopa Tribe Neighborhood Facility.
Vice Mayor/Vice President Kiesel stated he attended the Rethink Waste Board of Directors/Technical Advisory Committee Retreat on March 27. On March 28, he attended the Peninsula Council of Lions Clubs 60th Annual Police, Sheriff, and Firefighters Awards Banquet to honor the local first responders and their acts of service.
Mayor/President/Chair Jimenez reminded the community that April is Earth Month and encouraged everyone to participate in the Wyland Foundation’s 2025 Mayor’s Challenge for Water Conservation. She requested to agendize a discussion on lowering the speed limit to 20mph within 1000ft of a school zone and received the support of Councilmember/Director Venkat and Councilmember/Director Sullivan. She also
6.2 6.2 Minutes
15 requested to agendize a discussion to explore a commercial vacancy tax, which received the support of Councilmember/Director Niederhofer and Councilmember/Director Venkat.
ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no objection from the City Council/EMID Board/FCJPA Board, Mayor/President/Chair Jimenez adjourned the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 7:54 p.m.
6.2 6.2 Minutes
16 8
6 9
DATE: April 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
FROM: Cory Call, Police Chief
DEPARTMENT: Police
SUBJECT: AB 481 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and review the Foster City Police Department's 2024 Military Equipment Use Annual Report (Attachment 2) and adopt a resolution renewing Ordinance No. 647 regarding Police Department acquisition and use of military equipment pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Government Code Section 7070 et seq. and approving the Military Equipment Use Policy ("Policy 709").
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) and the California Government Code requires a law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment use policy pursuant to Gov. Code Section 7071 to submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use.
In addition, Gov. Code Section 7071(e)(1) requires that the legislative body review the ordinance that adopted Policy 709 and vote on whether to renew it annually.
BACKGROUND
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
17 8
6 9
On September 30, 2021, AB 481 was signed into law. Subsequently, Cal. Gov. Code Sections 7070, 7071, and 7072 were adopted to codify the requirements set forth in AB 481.
The text of AB 481 and the above-mentioned Cal. Gov. Codes are attached to this Staff Report for reference.
AB 481 requires a law enforcement agency to obtain the approval of its governing body, through the adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy, by ordinance at a regular meeting held pursuant to specified open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined. The bill allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets specified standards. On April 18, 2022, the City Council reviewed and voted to approve Policy 709 by Ordinance. A second reading was held on May 2, 2022, and Ordinance No. 647 was adopted. AB 481 also requires the governing body to annually review the ordinance and to either approve or disapprove a renewal of the authorization for a type of military equipment or amend the military equipment use policy if it determines, based on a Military Equipment Annual Report prepared by the law enforcement agency, that the military equipment does not comply with the above-described standards for approval.
Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070 provides a list of types of equipment that are to be considered "Military Equipment" for purposes of compliance with AB 481 and the Government Code.
While the Foster City Police Department does not possess any tactical equipment that it has obtained from the military, nor does it possess any equipment that was designed for military use, it does possess some types of equipment that are listed in Gov. Code Section 7070.
Additionally, the Foster City Police Department participates in a regional Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team, which possesses and utilizes additional types of equipment that qualify as "Military Equipment" according to the Government Code.
ANALYSIS
Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070(d) defines a Military Equipment Use Policy as:
‘Military equipment use policy' means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by a law enforcement agency or a state agency that addresses, at a minimum, all of the following:
1. A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.
2. The purposes and authorized uses for which the law enforcement agency or the state agency proposes to use each type of military equipment.
3. The fiscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
18 8
6 9
maintaining the equipment.
4. The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use.
5. The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any officer, agent, or employee of the law enforcement agency or the state agency is allowed to use each specific type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy.
6. The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy.
7. For a law enforcement agency, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the law enforcement agency will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.
Cal. Gov. Code Section 7071(b) requires that the Police Department post to its website the Military Equipment Use Policy that it plans to propose to the City Council at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the policy. The Police Department complied with this requirement by posting the policy being proposed tonight, to its public website, on March 14, 2025.
Cal. Gov. Code Section 7071(d) stipulates that the City Council shall only approve the Military Equipment Use Policy if it determines all of the following:
1. The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
2. The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
3. If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
4. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.
Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070(e) establishes that the Police Department is responsible for delivering to the City Council an Annual Military Equipment Report, which the City Council can utilize to confirm compliance with the Policy 709 and the accompanying Military Equipment Use Ordinance.
The Foster City Police Department has not obtained any equipment from military
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
19 8
6 9
surplus programs, known as 1033 Programs, it does not possess any tactical equipment that it has obtained from the military, and it does not possess any equipment that was designed for military use.
That said, Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070 provides a list of sixteen (16) types of equipment that are to be considered "Military Equipment" for the purpose of compliance with AB 481 and the associated Government Codes, and the Police Department does possess and use some of these listed types of equipment. Of the sixteen (16) types of equipment specified, the Police Department possesses only three (3) types. The list of the sixteen (16) types of Military Equipment per Cal. Gov.
Code Section 7070 is included below. Equipment types that the Police Department possesses are noted in bold type.
1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. a. UAS/Drones may be utilized to enhance the Department's mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Uses may include but are not limited to:
search and rescue; suspect apprehension; crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring, identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance. This equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.
5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. a. The Police Department possesses a Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV).
This vehicle is not armored or weaponized in any way and is used to facilitate unified command during critical and planned incidents. This equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.
7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
8. Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
20 8
6 9
specifically excluded from this subdivision.
9. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.
10.Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency. a.The Police Department possesses 18 semi-automatic rifles. 14 of these rifles are standard-issue duty weapons that are for all Peace Officers, which actually exempts them from this policy per Cal.
Gov. Code Section 7070{c){10). We have nonetheless included them in this policy in the interests of full transparency. The remaining bolt action rifle was issued to our SWAT Sniper. Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to: Situations where the officer reasonably anticipates an armed encounter; When an officer is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range; Situations where an officer reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower; When an officer reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage; When an officer reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor; When authorized or requested by a supervisor. This equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
11. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
12."Flashbang" grenades and explosive breaching tools, "tear gas," and "pepper balls," excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
13. Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
14.The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, "bean bag," rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
a.The Police Department possesses twelve (12) 40mm less lethal projectile launchers. The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less lethal use of force option. This equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
21 8
6 9
16. Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), "Military Equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.
Additionally, the Foster City Police Department participates in a regional SWAT team (NCR SWAT), which possesses and utilizes additional types of equipment that qualify as "Military Equipment" according to Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070. While the equipment possessed by NCR SWAT is not purchased, owned, or maintained by the Police Department, it could be used in the City of Foster City if NCR SWAT is deployed, and is therefore included in the proposed Military Equipment Use Policy. It is important to note that NCR SWAT is generally only deployed in extreme circumstances such as active shooter incidents, hostage situations, and the execution of high-risk search and arrest warrants. The equipment NCR SWAT possesses is rarely deployed but could prove essential to emergency operations when needed.
The list of the sixteen (16) types of Military Equipment per Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070 is included below. Equipment types that the NCR SWAT Team possesses are noted in bold type.
1.Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.
2.Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
3.High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.
5.Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.
7.Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
8. Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
9. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.
10.Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
22 8
6 9
and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency.
11. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
12."Flashbang" grenades and explosive breaching tools, "tear gas," and "pepper balls," excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
13.Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
14.The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, "bean bag," rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
16. Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), "Military Equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.
The Military Equipment Use Annual Report being presented by staff includes detailed information for each type of Military Equipment listed, as required by Cal. Gov. Code Section 7070. This information includes the equipment's capabilities, its purpose/authorized uses, the legal/procedural rules governing its use, and the training required of staff prior to its use.
During the 2024 calendar year, no complaints related to military equipment were received by the Police Department. There were no violations of department policy related to the deployment of military equipment by department personnel. In the current 2025 calendar year, the Police Department intends to replace all 12 of its 40mm less lethal launchers including necessary munitions with similar updated versions. Currently, the Police Department's less lethal launchers are over 24 years old and have been fully funded through the Equipment Replacement Fund since Fiscal Year 2023. Upon receipt of the new less lethal launchers, the Military Equipment Use Policy will be updated to reflect those items in the inventory. The less lethal launchers being replaced will be disposed of upon receipt of the new equipment.
Staff have drafted the attached 2024 Military Equipment Use Annual Report, as required by state law, for City Council's review and acceptance. In addition, pursuant to Government Code section 7072(b), the Department has made the 2024 Military Equipment Use Annual Report publicly available by posting it on its website.
As noted previously, Gov. Code Section 7071(e)(1) requires that the City Council shall review any ordinance that it adopted approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually, and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
23 8
6 9
regular meeting. In considering whether to renew the Ordinance, the City Council shall determine based on the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Section 7072, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval. If the governing body determines that a type of military equipment identified in that annual military equipment report has not complied with the standards for approval, the governing body shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of military equipment or require modifications to the military equipment use policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance.
As detailed in the annual report, and above, the Police Department met the standards for use of the military equipment established in Policy 709. Although the Police Department did not deploy any such equipment, nor did NCR SWAT, continuing to have access to such equipment is vital to the Department in the event exigent circumstances occur. In such situations, there is sometimes a need to deploy military equipment to promote the safety and security of the community. The Department has exhibited its ability to judiciously utilize such equipment. As such, staff is recommending that the City Council vote to renew Ordinance No. 647.
California Environmental Quality Act
This item is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a "project" that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Public Safety and Social Equity
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Military Equipment Use Annual Report Attachment 3 – Ordinance No. 647
Attachment 4 – Foster City Police Department Policy 709 Attachment 5 – Foster City Police Department Equipment List
6.3 6.3 Staff Report
24 3
2 2
2 RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY RENEWING ORDINANCE NO. 647 REGARDING POLICE DEPARTMENT ACQUISITION AND USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 481 AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7070 ET SEQ. AND APPROVING THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) (Government Code sections 7071 et. seq.) sets forth a process by which law enforcement agencies are to obtain approval from their governing bodies of a military equipment use policy through the adoption of an ordinance; and
WHEREAS, AB 481 added California Government Code Sections 7070 et seq. to codify the requirements set forth in AB 481 including that the City Council of Foster City annually review its Military Equipment and Use policy; and WHEREAS, the Foster City Police Department currently has military equipment (as that term is defined in Government Code section 7070(c)) in its inventory; and WHEREAS, the Foster City Police Department works closely with other local, county, state and federal law enforcement agencies within San Mateo County on police related matters, including safeguarding the public's welfare and safety, working on regional task forces, conducting training exercises, providing mutual aid and responding to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, in exigent circumstances, there is sometimes the need to deploy military equipment from or lend military equipment to outside entities to promote the safety and security of community members; and
WHEREAS, the continued collaboration with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the City is necessary to safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties and there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and WHEREAS, On April 18, 2022 and May 2, 2022, the Foster City City Council held a first and second reading, respectively, of Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and
6.3 Attachment 1 - Resolution
25 3
2 2
2 Government Code Section 7070 Et Seq. and Approving The Military Equipment Use Policy; and
WHEREAS, Foster City Police Policy 709 sets forth a military equipment use policy that is consistent with the Police Department's current practices, has been posted on the Department's website since its adoption and complies with all the requirements of AB 481, and will ensure ongoing regulation and compliance with the law going forward and will provide a means of community engagement and transparency regarding use of military equipment by the Department; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 7072 requires the Foster City Police Department to submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body, as well as make such report available on its website. And further that within 30 days of publicly releasing the annual report, the law enforcement agency shall hold a well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting; and
WHEREAS, The Foster City Police Department did submit an annual report to the City Council and make it publicly available on its website on March 14, 2025. Further, the Foster City Police Department did publicize that the Department would present the annual report at the April 21, 2025 City Council Meeting where members of the community would be allowed to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual report; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2025, the Foster City Police Department did host a Coffee with a Cop event where the public was provided opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual report; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2025, the Foster City Police Department presented the annual report, where public comment, and comments from the City Council were made, and the annual report was discussed; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2025, the City Council reviewed Ordinance No. 647, Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 And Government Code Section 7070 Et Seq. Approving The Military Equipment Use Policy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted the annual report and desires to renew Ordinance No. 647 in compliance with AB 481.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Foster City, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Foster City finds and determines as follows:
6.3 Attachment 1 - Resolution
26 3
2 2
2 A. The facts set forth in the recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. The recitals constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other information contained in the record, are an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the actions taken in this ordinance.
B. That based on the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Section 7072, that each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in Government Code section 7071(d).
C. The City Council has reviewed Ordinance No. 647 Regarding Police Department Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 And Government Code Section 7070 et Seq. Approving the Military Equipment Use Policy, and wishes to renew that ordinance for an additional year, as the Council continues to find the following:
a. Authorizing the use of military equipment as set forth in Ordinance No. 647 and Foster City Police Policy 709 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. The acquisition and use of the military equipment as set forth in Foster City Police Policy 709 is part of the Police Department's overall approach to Critical Incident Management, Use of Force, De-Escalation and public safety. The equipment will enable department members to properly respond to both planned and unplanned events efficiently and effectively. b. Ordinance no. 647 and Foster City Police Policy 709 will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties by ensuring required reporting out, the opportunity for community engagement and feedback, and transparency and oversight regarding the acquisition and use of the specified military equipment in the City of Foster City.
c. The Foster City Police Department is not proposing to purchase any military equipment, as defined in AB 481, at this time.
d. Prior military equipment use, as defined by AB 481, by the Foster City Police Department complied with applicable policies in effect at the time of the use. e. Ordinance No. 647 and Foster City Police Policy 709 comply with the requirements of AB 481.
6.3 Attachment 1 - Resolution
27 3
2 2
2 Section 2. The City Council finds that renewal of Ordinance No. 647 and Foster City Police Policy 709 are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because they will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a "project," as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 3. The City Council further directs staff to continue its annual review procedure to review and provide for approval of any renewal of the military equipment use policy, in accordance with Government Code section 7072, to occur before May 1st of each subsequent year.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
6.3 Attachment 1 - Resolution
28 Outside
Agency FCPD
DJI M30 N/A 1 N/A
DJI M3T N/A 6 N/A
Skydio X10 N/A 5 N/A
Sky Hero Loki Mkll N/A 2 N/A
DJI Mavic Mini N/A 4 N/A
DJI Avata N/A 5 N/A
DJI Neo N/A 1 N/A
Transcent Robotics N/A 3 N/A
iRobot packbot 510 N/A 1 N/A
Recon robotics recon scout N/A 1 N/A
Armored Vehicles
International Armor Group
Sentinel
The purpose of the armored vehicle is to provide for the safe transport, security, and rescue of agency personnel and citizens in high-risk incidents, and the equipment was used in this manner, for law enforcement purposes. N/A
NCR SWAT
(outside agency) None 1 N/A
Braun Northwest Mobile
Command Vehicle N/A 1 N/A
Ford F53 Motorhome Command
Post N/A
FC Open House
Display 1 N/A
Colt M4 Carbine LE 6921 EPR 14.5" Training 1,200.00$
Field Operations
Budget 14 N/A
Colt M4 Carbine LE 6933 EPR 11.5" Training 1,400.00$
Field Operations
Budget 4 N/A
.308 Bolt Action Remington 700 win
Training
1,000.00$
Field Operations
Budget 1 N/A
SPEER GOLD DOT .223 CALIBER 62 GRAIN RIFLE
ROUND Training 2,600.00$
Field Operations
Budget 5000 N/A
FEDERAL AMERICAN EAGLE .223 CALIBER 55
GRAIN RIFLE ROUND Training 2,000.00$
Field Operations
Budget 10000 N/A
Remington Disintegrator .223 CALIBER
FRANGIBLE RIFLE ROUND Training 1,500.00$
Field Operations
Budget 980 N/A
FEDERAL AMERICAN EAGLE 9MM LUGER Training 2,500.00$
Field Operations
Budget 4500 N/A
FEDERAL TACTICAL HST 9MM LUGER Training 1,500.00$
Field Operations
Budget 9000 N/A
Hornady 308, 168 grain AMAX Training 400.00$
Field Operations
Budget 80 N/A
Hornady 308, 165 grain GMX Barrier Training 300.00$
Field Operations
Budget 120 N/A
RUAG .308 STYX 167 grain Training 435.00$
Field Operations
Budget 400 N/A
AR-15 semi-auto rifles and ammunition
N/A NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
TD Multiport Plus Distraction Device
N/A
52.00$
Varies, depending
on usage 5 N/A
Defense Technology- Training safe smoke
grenade
N/A N/A
32.00$ 0 2 N/A
Detonating Cord N/A 0 feet N/A
Blasting Cap N/A 0 N/A
Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun N/A 5 N/A
Defense Technology- Frangible Breaching
Round N/A 50 N/A
CTS 7290M
N/A
N/A
CTS 5230 N/A
N/A
CTS 6330 and 6340 N/A
N/A
CTS 5230B N/A N/A
CTS 8210 N/A
N/A
Funding source
for following
calendar year
QTY
possessed
of each
type of
equipment
If we intend to acquire
additional military
equipment in the next
year, the quantity sought
Rifles & Ammunition
The purpose of equipment is to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible, and this is the manner in which it was deployed, including training.
Possessed by
Summary of
complaints
received
Result of any internal
audits or violations of
military equipment use
policy Acquisition Costs Annual Costs
Where equipment was
used
Equipment Category Description Summary of how equipment was used and purpose of use Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
UAS/Drones may be utilized to enhance the Department’s mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Uses may include but are not limited to: (a) search and rescue; (b) suspect apprehension; (c) crime scene documentation; (d) tactical operations; (e) scene security; (f) hazard monitoring, (g) identification and mitigation; (h) response to emergency calls; (i) crisis communications; (j) legally authorized surveillance.
NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
N/A-Maintained
and operated by
another agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
Command and Control Vehicles The equipment was utilized as a mobile command post during any incidents that required command and control beyond a static dispatch center and included official law enforcement purposes, pre-planned evens and training exercises.
NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
None
Robots NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
Robots were utilized to remotely gain visual/audio intelligence, deliver equipment, open doors, and clear buildings ahead of a search team, for official law enforcement purposes, including search and rescue; suspect apprehension; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring, identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; and legally authorized surveillance.
Annual
maintenance is
$25.00/rifle.
Ammunition costs
are typically
$11,000/year
Distraction Devices FCPD
None
FCPD
None
NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained
and operated by
another agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
The purpose of the equipment is to limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable such as self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals; barricaded suspects; riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents; and training exercises.
We assess and monitor after any
deployment or use of equipment to
ensure the equipment is being utilized
in a manner which is consistent with
Department Policy and there were no
violations
Chemical Agents NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained
and operated by
another agency
Field Operations
Budget
Distraction devices were deployed to distract dangerous suspects to allow tactical teams to complete a dangerous mission or task. Distraction devices were only used during high- risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety; and during training exercises.
Explosive Breaching Tools
The purpose of the equipment is to safely create a positive breach and enter structures for official law enforcement purposes and in accordance with State and Federal Law; and during training exercises. This equipment was not used last year.
6.3 Attachment 2 - Military Equipment Use Annual Report
29 Long Range Acoustical Device Long Range Acoustical Device (LRAD) The purpose of the equipment is to issue dispersal orders during crowd and riot control situations or to address the public in civil emergencies, natural disasters, evacuations, and police incidents. In the last year this was deployed to give direction during high-risk situations.
N/A
NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained
and operated by
another agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
1 N/A
CTS Launching cup Combined Systems LC5 40MM Launching Cup The purpose of the equipment is to limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable such as self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals; barricaded suspects; riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents; and training exercises. This equipment was not used last year N/A
NCR SWAT
(outside agency)
None
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A-Maintained
and operated by
another agency
N/A-Maintained and
operated by another
agency
N/A
Defense Technologies 40MM Launcher
Training
1,000.00$ 0
Field Operations
Budget 12 N/A
Direct Impact 40MM Reloadable Training
Sponge Round
Training
1,102.00$
Varies, depending
on usage
Field Operations
Budget 254 N/A
Combined Systems 40MM Sponge, smokeless,
spin stabilized
N/A
924.00$ 0
Field Operations
Budget 44 N/A
40mm Launchers and Rounds
The purpose of the equipment is to limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable such as self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals; barricaded suspects; riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents; and training exercises. This equipment was not used last year FCPD
None
We assess and monitor after any
deployment or use of equipment to
ensure the equipment is being utilized
in a manner which is consistent with
Department Policy and there were no
violations
6.3 Attachment 2 - Military Equipment Use Annual Report
30 ORDINANCE NO. 647
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY REGARDING POLICE
DEPARTMENT ACQUISITION AND USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 481 AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7070 ET SEQ. AND
APPROVING THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
The City Council of the City of Foster City does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) (Government Code sections 7071 et. seq.) sets forth a process by which law enforcement agencies are to obtain approval from their governing bodies of a military equipment use policy through the adoption of an ordinance; and
WHEREAS, AB 481 added California Government Code Sections 7070, 7071, and 7072 to codify the requirements set forth in AB 481 includin g that the City Council of Foster City approve a Military Equipment and Use policy by Ordinance;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 7071(a)(1), requires that an ordinance must be timely adopted before a law enforcement agency may acquire or use new or existing military equipment and engage in other specified activities; and
WHEREAS, the Foster City Police Department currently has military equipment (as that term is defined in Government Code section 7070(c)) in its inventory; and
WHEREAS, the Foster City Police Department works closely with other local, county, state and federal law enforcement agencies within San Mateo County on police related matters, including safeguarding the public’s welfare and safety, working on regional task forces, conducting training exercises, providing mutual aid and responding to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, in exigent circumstances, there is sometimes the need to deploy military equipment from or lend military equipment to outside entities to promote the safety and security of community members; and
WHEREAS, the continued collaboration with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the City is necessary to safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights and c ivil liberties and there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: 152901D7-7F7E-410C-8BC2-4BD936F62DBA
6.3 Attachment 3 - Ordinance No. 647
31 City Ordinance No. 647
WHEREAS, Foster City Police Policy 709 sets forth a military equipment use policy that is consistent with the Police Department’s current practices, has been posted on the Department’s website for at least thirty (30) days, complies with all the requirements of AB 481, will ensure ongoing regulation and compliance with the law going forward and will provide a means of community engag ement and transparency regarding use of military equipment by the Department; and
WHEREAS, public notice has been provided in accordance with applicable law;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve a military use policy in compliance with AB 481.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Foster City, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Foster City finds and determines as follows:
A. The facts set forth in the recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. The recitals constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other information contained in the record, are an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the actions taken in this ordinance.
B. Authorizing the use of military equipment as set forth in this ordinance and Foster City Police Policy 709 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. The acquisition and use of the military equipment as set forth in Foster City Police Policy 709 is part of the Police Department’s overall approach to Critical Incident Management, Use of Force, De-Escalation and public safety. The equipment will enable department members to properly respond to both planned and unplanned events efficiently and effectively.
C. This ordinance and Foster City Police Policy 709 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties by ensuring required reporting out, the opportunity for community engagement and feedback, and transparency and oversight regarding the acquisition and use of the specified military equipment in the City of Foster City.
D. The Foster City Pol ice Department is not proposing to purchase any military equipment, as defined in AB 481, at this time.
E. Prior military equipment use, as defined by AB 481, by the Foster City Police DocuSign Envelope ID: 152901D7-7F7E-410C-8BC2-4BD936F62DBA
6.3 Attachment 3 - Ordinance No. 647
32 City Ordinance No. 647
Department complied with applicable policies in effect at the time of the use.
F. This ordinance and Foster City Police Policy 709 comply with the requirements of AB 481.
Section 2. The City Council finds that this ordinance and Foster City Police Policy 709 are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because they will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project,” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 3. Approval of Military Equipment Policy. The City Council adopts the 2022-2023 Military Equipment Use Policy, as set forth in Exhibit A. The City Council further directs staff to establish an annual review procedure to review and provide for approval of any renewal of the military equipment use policy, in accordance with Government Code section 7072, to occur before May 1st of each subsequent year.
Section 4 . Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of thi s ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk of the City of Foster City shall cause this ordinance to be published pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 152901D7-7F7E-410C-8BC2-4BD936F62DBA
6.3 Attachment 3 - Ordinance No. 647
33 City Ordinance No. 647
This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 16th day of April, 2022, and passed and adopted on the 2nd day of May 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Froomin, Gehani, Hindi, Sullivan, and Mayor Awasthi NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
____________________________________
RICHA AWASTHI, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 152901D7-7F7E-410C-8BC2-4BD936F62DBA
6.3 Attachment 3 - Ordinance No. 647
34 Policy
709
Foster City Police Department
Foster City PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
709.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
California Government Code section 7071(b) requires that law enforcement agencies submit a proposed Military Equipment Use Policy to their governing body for approval.
California Government Code §7070(c) provides a list of equipment types that are considered to be "military equipment" for purposes of this policy requirement, and this Military Equipment Use Policy includes information for any such equipment types that are possessed by the Foster City Police Department, or reasonably likely to be deployed in Foster City by its law enforcement partners. 709.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):
Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.
Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• Area denial electroshock devices, microwave weapons, water cannons, long-range acoustic devices (LRADs), acoustic hailing devices, and sound cannons. • Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/10, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Foster City Police Department Military Equipment - 503
6.3 Attachment 4 - Foster City Police Department Policy 709
35 Foster City Police Department
Foster City PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
709.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Foster City Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of California Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 709.3 ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070(d)(6), and in accordance with California Government Code §7072, the Foster City Police Department will submit to the Foster City City Council an Annual Military Equipment Report and will make that report publicly available on its internet website. The Annual Military Equipment Report required by this section will remain publicly available on the City's internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.
In addition, within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an Annual Military Equipment Report pursuant to this section, the Police Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting. The Annual Military Equipment Report will include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(a) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (b) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (c) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (d) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. (e) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (f) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
The Foster City City Council will use the Annual Military Equipment Report as a mechanism to ensure the Foster City Police Department's compliance with this Military Equipment Use Policy, and to help it determine whether to approve, revise, or revoke components of the Military Equipment Use Policy for the subsequent year.
709.4 COLLABORATION OR COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Law enforcement agencies responding to a call for mutual aid or who participate in collaboration with Foster City Police Department within the City of Foster City shall adhere to their own policies on the use of military equipment.
709.5 POLICY COMPLIANCE
Government Code section 7070 requires that this policy specify the mechanisms to be used by the Department to ensure compliance with this policy. Complaints regarding violations of this policy Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/10, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Foster City Police Department Military Equipment - 504
6.3 Attachment 4 - Foster City Police Department Policy 709
36 Foster City Police Department
Foster City PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
are subject to investigation and discipline in accordance with Policy 1020, and other policies of the Department related to officer discipline. Complaints, questions, or other inquiries can be made as described below in the Public Involvement section. Further, The Chief will designate a Military Equipment Coordinator, whose responsibilities are described herein, which will include assisting with ensuring compliance with this policy.
709.6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070(d)(7), members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of Military Equipment in this policy by any of the following means:
(a) Via email to: [email protected]
(b) Via phone call to: 650-286-3300
(c) Via mail sent to: Foster City Police Department Attn: Military Equipment Coordinator 1030 E. Hillsdale Blvd. Foster City Ca 94404
The Foster City Police Department is committed to responding to complaints, concerns and/or questions received through any of the above methods in a timely manner. 709.7 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police shall designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Foster City Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
(a) Publicizing the details of the meeting.
(b) Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/10, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Foster City Police Department Military Equipment - 505
6.3 Attachment 4 - Foster City Police Department Policy 709
37 Foster City Police Department
Foster City PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
709.8 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
Pursuant to Government Code section 7070(d), the below provides a description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment. This section will include the purposes and authorized uses, the fiscal impact, the legal and procedural rules that govern the use, and the training required, for each type of military equipment.This section of the Military Equipment Use Policy is divided into two sections.
Section One lists qualifying equipment that is owned and/or utilized by the Foster City Police Department.
Section Two lists qualifying equipment not previously listed in this policy, that is not owned or regularly utilized by the Foster City Police Department, but which is known to be owned and/ or utilized by the North Central Regional SWAT (NCR SWAT) Team, for which the Foster City Police Department is a participating agency. While the equipment in Section Two is not purchased, owned, or maintained by the Foster City Police Department, it could be used in the City of Foster City if NCR SWAT is deployed, and is therefore included in this Military Equipment Use Policy. It is important to note that NCR SWAT is generally only deployed in extreme circumstances such as active shooter incidents, hostage situations, and the execution of high risk search and arrest warrants. The equipment NCR SWAT possesses is rarely deployed but could prove essential to emergency operations when needed.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/10, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Foster City Police Department Military Equipment - 506
6.3 Attachment 4 - Foster City Police Department Policy 709
38 Section One: Qualifying Equipment Owned/Utilized by the Foster City Police Department Equipment Name: 5.56 mm Semiautomatic Rifles and ammo - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(10) Quantity Owned/Sought: 18 owned
(14- 14.5” / 4 -11.5”)
Lifespan: 15 years
Equipment Capabilities: The Colt AR15 semiautomatic rifle is capable of firing 5.56 mm projectile bullet.
Manufacturer Product Description:
Colt Carbine LE 6921 EPR Series (14). 14.5”
Throughout the world today, Colt's reliability, performance, and accuracy provide our Armed Forces the confidence required to accomplish any mission. Colt's LE6921 EPR series shares many features of its combat-proven brother, the Colt M4.
(Description source: https://www.colt.com/detail-page/enh-patrol-rif-556mm-16-301) Colt M4 Carbine LE 6933 EPR (4). 11.5”
Built for the demanding use of those who protect our communities every day, the Colt Enhanced Patrol Rifle (EPR) is the next evolution in the world's most dependable, thoroughly field-tested patrol rifle.
Featuring an extended handguard that accepts modular rail segments for mounting a wide variety of pro-grade optics, lighting, and ergonomics-enhancing accessories, as well as the highly durable Magpul MBUS Pro Series front and rear back up sights and B5 Bravo buttstock. The Colt EPR reestablishes the Colt AR-15 as the finest tool for local, regional, and national law enforcement agencies.
The Colt AR15 semiautomatic rifle is capable of firing 5.56mm projectile bullet. i. SPEER GOLD DOT .223 CALIBER 62 GRAIN RIFLE ROUND, cost: $260 per case of 500, quantity: 3190 rounds. Remington ammunition made by Speer is reloadable, features nickel- plated brass cases and Boxer primers, and this is a non-corrosive round. The Gold Dot LE ammunition goes through a process of joining the jacket and core one molecule at a time, thanks to this, Speer eradicates the potential for the leading cause of bullet failure (jacket/core separation). This process will guarantee extraordinary weight retention through barriers as strong as auto-glass. In addition to its remarkable strength, Gold Dot rifle ammunition asserts remarkable accuracy. With exact tolerances and unparalleled bullet uniformity of jacket thickness.
ii. FEDERAL AMERICAN EAGLE AMMUNITION .223 55 GRAIN FULL METAL JACKET, cost: $192.26 per case of 500, quantity: 6100 rounds. Federal American Eagle Ammunition is designed specifically for target shooting, training and practice. This ammo is loaded to the same specifications as Federal's Premium loads, but at a more practical price for economical practicing. This ammunition is new production in reloadable brass cases. iii. FEDERAL 9MM AMERICAN EAGLE 147 GRAIN FMJ TRAINING AMMUNITION, cost:
$218.93 per case of 500, quantity: 7750 rounds. Whether you’re looking for contemporary calibers or a couple of classics, our American Eagle line has what you’re looking for. Loaded with clean-burning powders, Federal grade primers and brass, and a choice of bullet styles, shooters know they get quality and affordability with American Eagle. Hit your target and train harder with the proven line of American Eagle® handgun ammunition. It provides
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
39 performance similar to self-defense and competition loads for a familiar feel and realistic practice.
iv.FEDERAL TACTICAL HST 9MM LUGER DUTY AMMUNITION. Quantity 2450 rounds, Cost: $1,500.00: Effective self-defense requires ammunition that provides consistent expansion, optimum penetration and superior terminal performance. And HST® delivers.
That’s why it’s already the duty load of choice for law enforcement officers throughout the world. Its specially designed hollow point won't plug while passing through a variety of barriers, and the bullet jacket and core hold together to provide nearly 100 percent weight retention through even the toughest materials.
v. REMINGTON DISINTEGRATOR .223 CALIBER FRANGIBLE RIFLE ROUND. Quantity 980 rounds, Cost: $1,600.00: Disintegrator Jacketed frangible ammo is a totally lead-free and heavy-metal-free, frangible training load for realistic, safe and cost-effective training and qualification programs. Bullet construction is a high strength metal particle core sealed in a jacket that instantly breaks up when impacting steel targets or backstops, leaving harmless metal particles and small pieces of thin jacket.
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
Members may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the member can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to: (a) situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter, (b) when a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range, (c) situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower, (d) when a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage, (e) when a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor, (f) when authorized or requested by a supervisor, and (g) when needed to euthanize an animal.
Fiscal Impacts: The initial cost of equipment was approximately $23,000. The ongoing costs for ammunition will vary and maintenance is conducted by departmental staff.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Foster City Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.
Training Required: Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
Other Notes:
Equipment Name: .308 Bolt Action Rifle – Remington 700 win and ammo Quantity Owned/Sought: 1 owned Lifespan:Barrel life rated for approximately 5,000 rounds.
Equipment Capabilities: A bolt-action shoulder-fired rifle with precision optics that fires a .308 Winchester cartridge.
Manufacturer Product Description:
It's the number one bolt-action of all time, proudly made in the U.S.A. For over 50 years, more Model 700s have been sold than any other bolt-action rifle before or since. The legendary strength of its 3- rings-of-steel receiver paired with a hammer-forged barrel, combine to yield the most popular bolt- action rifle in history.
Top choice of elite military snipers, the Model 700 is unequalled in tactical precision. Whether defending freedom or pursuing big game, its out-of-the-box accuracy is unmatched. (Description source: https://www.remarms.com/rifles/bolt-action/model-700/) The Remington 700 Bolt Action Rifle is capable of firing a .308 projectile bullet.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
40 i. Hornady 308, 165 grain GMX Barrier, quantity 80 rounds, cost $400: Hornady TAP® Barrier™ .308 Win 20/BOX GMX TAP 165gr TAP® Barrier™ turns cover into concealment.
Unique tactical situations demand ammunition with unique qualities — and Hornady® 308 WIN TAP® Barrier™ ammunition is one of the most specialized cartridges ever developed.
The 165 gr. 308 Win TAP® Barrier™ round penetrates auto glass, sheet metal and any other conventional barriers while still delivering superior terminal performance on the opposite side. It features a tough bonded core and jacket that allows it to reliably penetrate barriers while delivering devastating stopping power with virtually no fragmentation ii. RUAG .308 STYX 167 grain SWS P 200 Hornady 308, quantity 280 rounds, cost $435.00: The hyper expanding hollow point bullet immediately deposits its energy within a very short distance providing excellent stopping power on soft targets and is direction stable. The sophisticated bullet tip provides an absolutely reliable hyper expansion to approximately twice the original diameter. Tight production tolerances and small production batches ensure constant ballistic values and stringent quality controls guarantee identical trajectory from batch to batch. A wide range of special purpose bullets provide the desired terminal effect on hard and soft targets on every mission. All .308 Win. SWISS P rounds have an identical point of impact at 100 m which allows the shooter to instantly change the bullet type. iii. Norma .308 168 grain Golden Target, quantity 300 rounds, cost $400.00: The purpose of the new military design was to make a more compact cartridge with a quicker cycle rate. It also has excellent accuracy potential and is favored by many target shooters. As the .308 Winchester fits into short bolt actions and delivers almost the same energy as the .30-06 with medium weight bullets it has become one of the most popular cartridges in the world.
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
308 bolt action Sniper rifles are to be used exclusively by officers assigned to the SWAT Sniper Team.
These rifles are typically deployed with the SWAT Sniper Team during high risk SWAT operations and special events or instances wherein Sniper Over Watch Teams are needed.
The use of this weapons system is also governed under Lexipol Policy 300 - Use of Force, and Lexipol Policy 312 – Firearms.
Fiscal Impacts: The initial cost of equipment was approximately $1,000. The ongoing costs for ammunition will vary and maintenance is conducted by departmental staff.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Foster City Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.
Training Required: SWAT Snipers must successfully complete a month-long SWAT Academy and have at least two years’ experience on the SWAT Team prior to being eligible for Sniper selection.
SWAT Snipers must attend a 40-hour POST approved Basic Sniper School, and regularly train and qualify with various weapons systems including the .308 bolt action Sniper rifle to maintain proficiency.
Other Notes:
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
41 Equipment Name: Flashbang grenades, tear gas and pepper balls - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(12)
Quantity Owned/Sought: 6 Lifespan: Upon use
Equipment Capabilities: A distraction device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations.
Manufacturer Product Description:
i. ALS09NR (Flashbang) / TD Multiport Plus Distraction Device, cost $51.92 each, quantity 5: The Multi-Port™ II Distraction Device® Non-Reloadable is a new addition to the Defense Technology® product line. This device continues to provide the customer with the same historical performance as the Low Roll II™ Non-Reloadable Distraction Device but incorporates a round body and a water-resistant charge tube. • Single use, non-reloadable device • Delivers a sound and light output which are noticeable in day or night conditions • Produces 175 dB of sound output at 5 ft.
• Produces 6–8 million Candela light output
• Water-resistant charge tube for high humidity environments ii. DEFENSE TECHNLOGY- Safe-Smoke training white smoke grenade cost $31.65 each, quantity
2. Purpose/Authorized Uses:
Distraction devices are ideal for distracting dangerous suspects to allow tactical teams to complete a dangerous mission or task. Distraction devices shall only be used by officers trained in the proper use and deployment. Diversionary Devices shall only be used: (a) by officers who have been trained in their proper use, (b) in hostage and barricaded subject situations, (c) in high risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers, (d) during other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety, and € during training exercises.
Fiscal Impacts: Varies depending on use.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: It is the policy of the FCPD to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.
Training Required: Officers must attend training hosted by certified POST instructors which is followed by annual refresher training.
Other Notes:
Equipment Name: 40mm Launchers and rounds
Quantity Owned/Sought: 12 Lifespan: 20 years
Equipment Capabilities: 40mm Launchers are utilized by department personnel as a less lethal tool to launch less lethal impact rounds. The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, which are essentially rubber projectiles.
Manufacturer Product Description:
Defense Technologies 40mm launcher, cost $1,000.00 ea. Manufactured exclusively for Defense Technology®, the 40LMTS is a tactical single shot launcher with light rail. The ambidextrous Lateral Sling Mount (LSM) and QD mounting systems allow both a single and two point sling attachment. The 40LMTS will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. The Picatinny Rail Mounting System will accept a wide array of enhanced optics/sighting systems. i.Direct Impact 40mm reloadable training Sponge Round – Model 6530 Defense Technology.
Approx. 254 rounds. 6530LE-50 40mm Reloadable Training Round provides the same point of impact accuracy as the 40mm munitions it simulates and is the most cost effective way to conduct training. Reloading the munitions takes seconds and one hex key. Product for use on inanimate targets.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
42 ii. 40mm sponge, smokeless, spin stabilized/Combined Systems. Approx. 44 rounds. Sponge Baton is a spin-stabilized projectile delivering blunt trauma effect. Although it is extremely accurate and consistent, accuracy is dependent on the launcher, using open sights vs. an improved sight, environmental conditions, and the operator. Effectiveness depends on many variables, such as distance, clothing, stature, and the point where the projectile impacts.
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less lethal use of force option. To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use may include, but are not limited to: (a) self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals; (b) barricaded suspects; and (c) training exercises.
Fiscal Impacts: The initial cost of this equipment was approximately $12,000. The ongoing costs for munitions will vary and maintenance is conducted by departmental staff.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Foster City Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Crowd Control.
Training Required: Officers must complete a department certified 40mm course as well as regular training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
Other Notes:
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
43 Section Two: Qualifying Equipment known to be owned and/or utilized by law enforcement units with which the Foster City Police Department collaborates and/or participates for law enforcement purposes
Equipment Name: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS/Drones) – CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(1) Quantity Owned/Sought: 24 (not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: All UAS equipment, 5-7 years.
Equipment Capabilities: Remotely piloted aerial vehicle capable of providing live and recorded video images captured from aerial positions, including images enhanced by Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) and optical zoom lenses.
Manufacturer Product Description:
i. DJI Matrice 30 cost $15,000, quantity 1: The DJI Matrice 30 is a powerful, industrial-grade fight platform with world-class agility and speed, two barometers, and redundant IMUs for maximum reliability, and new smart flight features that make capturing complex shots easy.
The aircraft’s visual sensors enable enhanced hovering precision even when flying indoors or in environments where GNSS is unavailable. The drone’s new airframe design gives it an IP43 Ingress Protection Rating, in accordance with the global IEC 60529 standard. The M210/M210 RTK’s mechanical design, along with quick release landing gears and mounted folding arms, makes it easy to transport, store, and prepare for flight. ii. Mavik II Enterprise, cost $6,500.00, quantity 6: The DJI Mavic II Enterprise features omnidirectional Vision Systems and Infrared Sensing Systems, and comes with a fully stabilized 3-axis gimbal camera with an equivalent 24-48 mm 2x optical enterprise lens capable of shooting 4k videos and 12 megapixel photos that support up to 6x FHD zoom. DJI signature technologies such as Obstacle Sensing and the Advanced Pilot Assistance System, help you capture complex shots effortlessly. Additional features like the built in AirSense make you aware of your surrounding airspace, and password protection helps you maintain secure access to your aircraft and protect your data.
iii. Skydio X10, quantity $22,000, quantity 5: The Skydio X10 combines new, cutting-edge data capture cameras, unparalled autonomy, and versatile hardware to searve a range of industries, inlicing public safety. The Skedio X10 boasts an impressive array of features and capabilities that have never before existed in a single platform, including high-resolutino cameras, versatile airframe, AI-Powered autonomy, and unmatched portability. Its compact size and ease of use enable distribution to every officer on patrol.
iv. Sky Hero Loki MkII, quantity 2, cost $10,000.00 (for kit of 2): The Loki MkII is the most incredible indoor small tactical UAV system in the world, fully purpose built for close quarter, under roof, tactical scouting missions. Operating in congested and dark environment, its purpose is to place a microphone and a camera practically anywhere to collect critical life- saving intelligence of immediate threats ahead of a team. It enables reliable and rapid situational awareness for precise decision making, while maximizing the team’s safety. v. DJI Mavic Mini, quantity 4, cost $1,200: The DJI Mavic Mini is a lightweight, foldable drone designed for ease of use and portability, boasting a maximum flight time of 30 minutes and capable of capturing 2.7K video and 12MP photos with a stabilized 3-axis gimbal. vi. DJI Avata, quantity 5, cost $1,200: The DJI Avata 2 is a compact, first-person view (FPV) drone designed for immersive, agile flying and capturing ultra-wide 4K stabilized video, featuring built-in propeller guards for safety and a 1/1.7" CMOS sensor. Small, lightweight design allows for indoor and outdoor use.
vii. DJI Neo, quantity 1, cost $400:
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
44 Purpose/Authorized Uses:
UAS/Drones may be utilized to enhance the Department’s mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Uses may include but are not limited to: (a) search and rescue; (b) suspect apprehension; (c) crime scene documentation; (d) tactical operations; (e) scene security; (f) hazard monitoring, (g) identification and mitigation; (h) response to emergency calls; (i) crisis communications; (j) legally authorized surveillance.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use:
Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. The use of the UAS potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances, operators and observers shall adhere to FAA altitude regulations and shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., residence, yard, enclosure). Operators and observers shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Reasonable precautions can include, for example, deactivating or turning imaging devices away from such areas or persons during UAS operations.
Training Required: Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone staff members must secure an FAA Remote Pilot License and complete all training required by our FAA certificate or authorization. For the ground vehicles agency-authored orientation course with annual refresher training.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through neighboring cities which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: Robots
Quantity Owned/Sought: 4 (not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: All robots and associated equipment, 8-10 years.
Equipment Capabilities: Robots are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.
Manufacturer Product Description: This equipment is not owned by the Foster City Police Department. Transcend Robotics (Qty: 2), iRobot packbot 510 (Qty:1), and Recon robotics recon scout (Qty: 1).
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to capture video and still images of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use:
The use of unmanned, remotely piloted, powered ground vehicles potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances, operators and observers shall adhere to all applicable privacy laws and shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., residence, yard, enclosure).
Training Required: The North County Regional SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to pilot these vehicles.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through neighboring cities which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
45 Equipment Name: Armored Vehicles (Wheeled vehicles that have a breaching apparatus attached - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(3))
Quantity Owned/Sought: 1 (not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: 12-15 years depending on use Equipment Capabilities:
Capable of transporting personnel and equipment while providing them with armored protection from gunfire. Capable of breaching doors, gates, and other points of entry.
Manufacturer Product Description:
International Armor Group Sentinel, cost $0.00, quantity 1: The all new IAG Sentinel ARV is an armored rescue vehicle re-designed specifically for tactical response teams, with added interior space and overall functionality in the event of a rapid deployment. Standard vehicle armoring is available in NIJ III/CEN B6, .50 cal and NIJ IV/CEN B7 that is rated to withstand multiple impacts from armor piercing 7.62x51mm rifle ammunition. The armoring system on the Sentinel Armored Rescue Vehicle protects the entire cabin with blast protection underneath the vehicle. The engine bay and fuel tank are also armored to prevent the vehicle from being disabled from ballistic threats or shrapnel. High payload wheels and tire package features an integrated run-flat and bead lock system to prevent the tires from dismounting from the wheel, as well as enables the vehicle to continue operating in the event of tire punctures. The vehicle can be outfitted with a large variety of equipment such as hydraulic ram, gas insertion equipment, 360-degree surveillance system, thermal and night vision capability, LRAD, ATF approved storage and much more. The interior layout can be completely customized to suit the specific mission requirements/application and allows for loading of a standard medical stretcher in emergency rescue situations. The dual rear doors are designed to lock into place at both 45° and 90° while built-in steps provide access to the no-slip roof. The oversized rear step and platform ensure ease of entry and exit while also providing plenty of space for operators to utilize the outside of the vehicle for rapid deployment.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: To provide for the safe transport, security, and rescue of agency personnel and citizens in high-risk incidents. Any use of the armored rescue vehicle will be for official law enforcement purposes. Examples of uses include breaching doors, gates, and other points of entry.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency. Purchased on a grant
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: Use shall be in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles. Breaching vehicles can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching. For a breaching to be lawful, it will generally need to be supported by a search or arrest warrant, or exigent circumstances.
Training Required: SMPD-authored orientation course; annual refresher. The North County Regional SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to drive this vehicle.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through neighboring cities which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: Command and control vehicles
Quantity Owned/Sought: 2 (not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: 12-15 years depending on use Equipment Capabilities: The Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV) provides mobile, remote access to radio, internet, planning and other resources to assist with management of major incidents and planned operations.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
46 Manufacturer Product Description:
i. Braun Northwest mobile command vehicle, cost $0.00, quantity 1: The MCV is built on a Ford F550 chassis and can be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, pre-planned large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events. Effective, reliable communication is critical in an emergency or crisis situation. To meet this important need, Braun Northwest custom-builds are durable, functional command/communication units. ii. Ford motor vehicle F53 motorhome command post, cost $100,000.00, quantity 1: The F53 command vehicle can be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, preplanned large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events. This vehicle can also be used as a mobile office that provides shelter, access to the Police Department computer systems, and restroom facilities on extended events.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: To serve as a mobile command post during any incident that requires command and control beyond a static dispatch center. Any use of the MCV vehicle will be for official law enforcement purposes, pre-planned events, or training exercises.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency. Purchased on a grant.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: Use shall be in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.
Training Required: SMPD: Users must complete an authored orientation course and an annual refresher.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through the San Mateo Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatus that are explosive in nature - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(7). Explosive Breaching tools
Quantity Owned/Sought: Unknown (Not owned by
FCPD)
Lifespan: Unknown
Equipment Capabilities: Capable of breaching doors, gates, windows, and other points of entry.
Tools that are used to conduct a positive breach using kinetic energy.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
47 Manufacturer Product Description:
i. DETONATING CORD, cost: $1 per foot, quantity: 0 feet. The detonating cord is a thin, flexible plastic tube usually filled with pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN, pentrite). With the PETN exploding at a rate of approximately 6400 m/s, any common length of detonation cord appears to explode instantaneously. It is a high-speed fuse which explodes, rather than burns, and is suitable for detonating high explosives.
ii. BLASTING CAP, cost: $12, quantity: 0. A blasting cap is a small sensitive primary explosive device generally used to detonate a larger, more powerful, and less sensitive secondary explosive such as TNT, dynamite, or plastic explosive. Blasting caps come in a variety of types, including non-electric caps, electric caps, and fuse caps. iii. REMINGTON 870 BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost: $500, quantity: 5. This weapon allows for breachers to safely utilize shotgun breaching rounds to destroy deadbolts, locks, and hinges.
The stand-off that is attached to the end of the barrel allows for positive placement of the gun into the correct position and vents gases to prevent overpressure. This weapon can also defeat windows and sliding glass doors with a flash bang round. A less lethal 2.4-inch 12-gauge shotgun round firing a ballistic fiber bag filled with 40 grams of lead shot at a velocity of 270- 290 feet per second (FPS).
iv. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY FRANGILBE BREACHING ROUND, cost: $5 per round, quantity: 50. The round is fired from a breaching shotgun and is used to destroy deadbolts, locks and hinges.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: To safely create a positive breach and enter a structure. Kinetic and shotgun breaching may only occur after authorization by the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander in the field, and during training exercises.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: Breaching apparatus that are explosive in nature can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and non-explosive breaching methods are not tactically practicable. For a breaching to be lawful, it will generally need to be supported by a search or arrest warrant, or exigent circumstances.
Training Required: The North County Regional SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to use explosive breaching apparatus.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through the San Mateo Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(13) Quantity Owned/Sought: 1 (Not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: Unknown Equipment Capabilities: LRAD systems are a type of Acoustic Hailing Device (AHD) used to send messages over long distances. LRAD systems produce much higher sound levels (volume) than normal loudspeakers or megaphones. Over shorter distances, LRAD signals are loud enough to cause pain in the ears of people in their path.
Manufacturer Product Description: Long Range Acoustical Device (LRAD), cost $0.00 (purchased on a grant), quantity 1: is a high intensity directional acoustical array for long range, crystal clear hailing, notification, and an unmistakable warning tone. The LRAD is primarily used as a communication device.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
48 Purpose/Authorized Uses: To be used to issue dispersal orders during crowd and riot control situations or to address the public in the event of civil emergencies, natural disasters, evacuations, and police incidents (e.g., missing persons, perimeters for wanted suspects/ K9 deployments, etc.). The LRAD may also be used to issue a warning tone. The LRAD shall only be used by officers trained in its deployment and used in a manner consistent with department policy and training.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: LRADs can only be deployed in accordance with all applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force, crowd control, etc.
Training Required: The North County Regional SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to use any of these items.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through the San Mateo Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: Chemical Agents, CTS Launching CUP
Quantity Owned/Sought: Unknown (not owned by
FCPD)
Lifespan: 5 years from date of manufacture.
Equipment Capabilities: Canisters that contain OC and CS chemical agents that are released when deployed. Has the capability to launch an OC or CS cannister from a 12 gauge less lethal shotgun.
Manufacturer Product Description:
i. CTS 7290M, cost $35.00 each, quantity 20: The CTS 7290M Mini Flash-Bang is the newest generation in the evolution of the Flash-Bang. Our Model 7290M Flash-Bang exhibits all the same attributes of its larger counterpart but in a smaller and lighter package. Weighing in at just 15 ounces the new 7290M is approximately 30% lighter than the 7290 but still has the same 175db output of the 7290 and produces 6-8 million candelas of light. The patented
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
49 design of the 7290M, incorporates a porting system that eliminates movement of the body at detonation even if the top or bottom of the device should be in contact with a hard surface. In addition, internal adjustments have greatly reduced smoke output. ii. CTS 5230, cost $30.00 each, quantity 20: 5230 JL large diameter burning grenade designed to discharge a high volume of smoke and chemical agent rapidly through multiple emission ports.
The smoke composition is formulated to burn rapidly decreasing the possibility that the grenade can be picked up and thrown back at crowd management officers. iii. CTS 6330 and 6340, cost $25.00 each, quantity 12: 6330 / 6340 A unique grenade delivering an invisible vapor and rendering an intense respiratory effect. Provides best results when used indoors and requires no personal decontamination.
iv. CTS 5230B, cost $35.00 each, quantity 10: 5230B Pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a maximum amount of irritant smoke throughout multiple rooms with minimal risk of fire.
v.CTS 8210, cost $25.00 each, quantity 10: 8210 Small diameter pyrotechnic irritant smoke grenade for outdoor use to disperse crowds. Emits smoke for up to 30 seconds and is small enough to carry in a pocket. Can be hand thrown or launched. vi.COMBINED SYSTEMS LC5 40MM LAUNCHING CUP, cost: $302, quantity: 2. The LC5 Launching Cups are designed for the 5200 series grenades. The cups can be attached to virtually any 12gauge shotgun and the munition launched with our model 2600 launching cartridge.
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
a. To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use may include, but are not limited to: (a) self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals; (b) barricaded suspects; (c) riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents; and (d) training exercises.
Fiscal Impacts: Unknown.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use:
Individual agency policies permitting the use of chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
Training Required: The North County Regional SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to use any of these items.
Other Notes: The Foster City Police Department participates in the North Central Regional SWAT Team (NCR SWAT). This equipment is owned and operated by NCR SWAT through the San Mateo Police Department, which could result in its deployment and/or use in the City.
Equipment Name: AR-15 Style Semiautomatic Rifle and Ammunition - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(10) Quantity Owned/Sought: 60 (not owned by FCPD) Lifespan: Approximately 15 years Equipment Capabilities: The AR15 style firearm can fire a .223, .556, .308 or .300 caliber projectile accurately at over 100 yards.
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
50 Manufacturer Product Description: The AR15 style firearm features M-LOK attachment technology with the Daniel Defense MFR 15.0 rail. Built around a Cold Hammer Forged, 16 inch barrel, the V7 has a DD improved Flash Suppressor to reduce flash signature. The mid-length gas system provides smooth and reliable cycling under any condition and reduces both perceived recoil and wear on moving parts.
With the M-LOK attachment points that run along 7 positions and an uninterrupted 1913 Picatinny rail on top, the V7 has plenty of room for the sights, optics, and accessories the user may require . The independently ambi GRIP-N-RIP Charging Handle accommodates left- and right-handed shooters. This rifle also comes with the ergonomic Daniel Defense Buttstock and Pistol Grip.
Purpose/Authorized Uses:
Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to: (a) situations where the officer reasonably anticipates an armed encounter; (b) when an officer is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range; (c) situations where an officer reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower; (d) when an officer reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage; (e) when an officer reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor; and (f) when authorized or requested by a supervisor.
Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment owned, maintained, and operated by another agency.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Foster City Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.
Training Required: In addition to patrol rifle and standard SWAT Operator training, SWAT Operators must successfully complete a CA POST certified SWAT course as well as regular SWAT training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
Other Notes:
6.3 Attachment 5 - Foster City Police Department Equipment List
51 Dated: April 21, 2025
FOSTER CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS
POLICY/REGULATORY AGENCIES
REPRESENTATIVE/ALTERNATE
1. Airport Community Roundtable Niederhofer/Venkat
2. Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC) Sullivan/Venkat
3. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Kiesel/Jimenez
4. City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) Jimenez/Kiesel
5. Council of Cities – City Selection Committee Jimenez/Kiesel
6. League of California Cities Jimenez/Kiesel
FOSTER CITY ADVISORY COMMITTEES
1. Audit Committee Niederhofer/Kiesel
2. Citizens Sustainability Advisory Committee Venkat/Sullivan
3. Parks and Recreation Committee Sullivan/Kiesel
4. Planning Commission Niederhofer/Sullivan
5. Traffic Review Committee Sullivan/Venkat
6. Youth Advisory Committee Venkat/Jimenez
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS (non-regulatory)
1. Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency
(BAWSCA)1
Kiesel
2. Chamber of Commerce Venkat/Niederhofer
3. Emergency Services Council Niederhofer/Sullivan
4. Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART)
Joint Powers Authority Member Agency Committee
Jimenez/Kiesel
5. Joint Powers Authority Fire Board for the San
Mateo Consolidated Fire Department
Jimenez/Venkat
6. Library Joint Powers Authority Kiesel/Sullivan
7. Peninsula Clean Energy Authority Jimenez/Niederhofer
8. Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance
(Commute.org)
Venkat/Jimenez
9. San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water System
Financing Authority (RFA)2
Kiesel
10. San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Emergency
Services
Sullivan/Niederhofer
11. San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District Venkat
12. San Mateo-Foster City Public Financing Authority
(JPFA)
Niederhofer/Jimenez
13. San Mateo Union High School District Sullivan
14. South Bayside Waste Management Authority
(SBWMA)
Kiesel/Jimenez
1 Vice Mayor Kiesel has been appointed as the EMID representative on BAWSCA to a partial term from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2025 and a full term from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029. 2 Vice Mayor Kiesel has been appointed as the EMID representative on the RFA to a partial term from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2025 and a full term from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029.
6.4 Council Liaisons List - April 21 2025
52 DATE: April 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Board of Directors
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City/District Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City/District Manager
FROM: Nate Cruz, Finance Director
Waqas Hassan, Assistant Finance Director
Mimi Lam, Financial Services Manager
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON MASTER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR FY 2025-26
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council/EMID Board of Directors hold a public hearing on the proposed changes to the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule. After considering the staff report and public testimony, it is further recommended that the City Council/EMID Board adopt the attached resolutions approving the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26, effective July 1, 2025.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the March 24, 2025 Budget Study Session, the City Council/EMID Board reviewed and provided direction for City staff to update the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule (“Schedule”). The updated schedule (Attachment 3) has incorporated such direction and includes fees and charges adjustments from the Community Development, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works Departments. At this time, it is appropriate to hold a public hearing on these proposed changes and, subject to public testimony and other direction provided by the City Council/EMID Board, approve the Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule for FY 2025-26 with an effective date of July 1, 2025.
7.1 7.1 Staff Report
53 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The last time the City/District conducted a user fee study (along with a cost allocation plan) was in 2023 (for use in the FY 2023-24 Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule). It is generally considered best practice to update user fee studies every 4 to 6 years. A user fee study provides a defensible methodology for calculating fees for service and determining the full cost recovery potential of services provided by various city departments. The City’s selected consultant, Willdan Financial Services conducted the update last year and staff from the various City departments presented their suggested fee adjustments for cost recovery purposes; the updated Schedule was approved by the City Council/EMID Board on May 1, 2023. It was subsequently updated for FY 2024-25 during the prior budget cycle.
Staff from various departments brought forward their suggested updates again this year and sought policy guidance from the City Council/EMID Board at the March 24, 2025 Budget Study Session. Based on the direction provided by Council/EMID Board, staff has prepared recommended Schedule (Attachment 3) for the City Council/EMID Board’s approval for the April 21st public hearing. There are no material changes from the March 24, 2025 hearing, but there are minor updates including:
•Clarifications on the duration of certain permits (adding the term “annually” as appropriate), and
•A minor reduction to the Below Market Rate in-lieu fee to match the change in the Engineering Construction Cost Index.
Lastly, a separate public hearing for increases in water and wastewater rates is planned for June 2, 2025, based on Proposition 218‘s 45-day noticing requirements.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Not Applicable
FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of an updated Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule provides for the cost recovery of various city services.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Staff Empowerment and Operational Excellence
7.1 7.1 Staff Report
54 ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – City Resolution
Attachment 2 – EMID Resolution
Attachment 3 – Proposed Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule for FY 2025-26 Redlined
Attachment 4 – Proposed Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule for FY 2025-26 Clean
7.1 7.1 Staff Report
55 RESOLUTION NO. _____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AMENDING THE MASTER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES SCHEDULE FOR FY 2025-2026
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule; and
WHEREAS, adjusting the Master Fees and Service Charges will provide an updated reflection on the cost recovery of providing services to the City’s customers; and WHEREAS, the proposed fees do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing services to the public; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing has been published and posted and said public hearing was held on April 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed fees reflect the cost recovery of providing services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by City Council of the City of Foster City that:
1. The attached Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule (Exhibit A) shall become effective on July 1, 2025; and
2. The City Council finds that adjustments in Master Fees and Service Charges are necessary to reflect the cost recovery of providing services.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the Regular Meeting held on the 21st day of April, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
7.1 Attachment 1 - City Resolution
56 RESOLUTION NO. _____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ESTERO MUNICIPAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AMENDING THE MASTER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES SCHEDULE FOR FY 2025-2026
ESTERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District adopted a Master Fees and Service Charges Schedule; and WHEREAS, adjusting the Master Fees and Service Charges will provide an updated reflection on the cost recovery of providing services to District customers; and WHEREAS, the proposed fees do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing services to the public; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing has been published and posted and said public hearing was held on April 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors finds that the proposed fees reflect the cost recovery of providing services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District that:
1. The attached Master Fees and Services Charges Schedule (Exhibit A) shall become effective on July 1, 2025; and
2. The Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District finds that adjustments in Master Fees and Service Charges are necessary to reflect the cost recovery of providing services.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District at the Regular Meeting held on the 21st day of April, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
STACY JIMENEZ, PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, DISTRICT SECRETARY
7.1 Attachment 2 - EMID Resolution
57 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
58 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
59 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
60 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
61 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
62 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
63 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
64 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
65 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
66 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
67 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
68 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
69 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
70 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
71 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
72 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
73 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
74 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
75 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
76 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
77 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
78 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
79 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
80 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
81 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
82 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
83 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
84 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
85 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
86 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
87 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
88 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
89 7.1
Attachment 3 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Redlined
90 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
91 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
92 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
93 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
94 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
95 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
96 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
97 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
98 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
99 7.1
Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
100
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
101
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
102
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
103
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
104
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
105
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
106
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
107
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
108
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
109
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
110
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
111
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
112
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
113
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
114
7.1 Attachment 4 - Proposed Master Fees and Schedule Charges FY 2025-2026 Clean
115
DATE: April 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director
Nori Jabba, Housing Coordinator
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 17.90
BELOW MARKET RATE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM
OF TITLE 17, “ZONING” OF THE FOSTER CITY MUNICIPAL
CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing for consideration of amendments to Chapter 17.90, Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program, within Title 17, Zoning of Foster City Municipal Code, and take action on one of the two options presented below:
Option #1 – Introduce and waive further reading of the Ordinance (Attachment 1) amending Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” Section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” adding new sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance,” and 17.90.150, Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to implement Housing Element Programs H-C-3-B, Anti- Displacement Strategy, and H-G-2-E Rental Registry, and finding the proposed Ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(B).
Option #2 – Consider the Planning Commission’s Report (Attachment 2) from the March 6, 2025, Planning Commission Public Hearing and remand the Ordinance back to the Planning Commission for further recommendations.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
116
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Housing Element is an integral part of the Foster City General Plan that identifies the community’s housing needs, states the community’s goals and objectives regarding housing production, rehabilitation, preservation, and conservation to meet those needs, and defines the policies and programs. The chapter containing Housing Goals, Policies, and Programs forms the housing policy roadmap for the city and describes the implementation measures that the city needs to undertake in the planning period 2023-31.
The Housing Element Programs include the City’s commitment to timeframes for implementation. The Annual Progress Report (APR) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), due by April 1 of each year, reports on progress in implementing these Programs.
The 2023-2031 Housing Element adopted by the City Council on May 22, 2023, and certified by HCD on March 20, 2024, contains several implementation programs. The previously approved programs relevant to this staff report include:
1. H-C-3-b, Anti-Displacement Strategy (page HE-90 of adopted 2023-31 Housing Element)
Develop an Anti-Displacement Strategy, including assessment of a variety of tenant protection measures to determine if appropriate for Foster City, including but not limited to: a) expansion of relocation benefits beyond those required by California law for landlords to pay to lower-income tenants to also apply to moderate-income tenants; b) expansion of the amount of relocation benefits beyond those required by California law for lower-income tenants; c) minimum lease terms; d) required notifications to tenants and landlords of legal requirements; and e) expansion of any other relocation/anti-displacement provisions.
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Timeframe: Implement program by December 2024
Funding Source: General Plan Maintenance Fund
2. H-G-2-e, Rental Registry (page HE-111 of adopted 2023-31 Housing Element) Unless a requirement for a State rental registry is adopted, explore a rental registry that tracks information such as rents, utilities, accessibility for disabled persons, tenant occupancy dates, and landlord contact information in order to improve the information available to landlords, tenants, and decision makers.
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Timeframe: Report to City Council by December 2024
Funding Source: General Fund
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
117
Government Code Section 65400 requires each jurisdiction to prepare an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the jurisdiction’s status and progress in implementing its housing element.
Each jurisdiction’s APR must be submitted to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), previously known as the Office of Planning and Research (OPR), and HCD by April 1 of each year (covering the previous calendar year. On March 17, 2025, the City Council approved the City’s General Plan and Housing Element APR. HCD has created the Housing Accountability Unit to ensure that jurisdictions follow through with their Housing Element commitments by implementing its goals, policies, and programs in a timely manner.
In order to stay on track for the timely implementation of the two (2) programs mentioned above, two (2) City Council study sessions were held last year to discuss the “Anti- Displacment Strategy” and “Rental Registry Program.” These study sessions are discussed in detail below.
Based on a majority of the City Council’s direction, staff prepared amendments to Chapter
17.90, Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program. The draft Ordinance was presented to the Planning Commission in a Public Hearing on March 6, 2025. At the meeting, the Commission voted 3-2, recommending the denial of the draft Ordinance. The attached meeting minutes (Attachment 2) constitute the Commission’s Report to the City Council pursuant to Section 17.74.060 of the Foster City Municipal Code (FCMC).
Staff recommends that the City Council take action on one of these two (2) options: Option #1 – introduce and waive further reading of the attached Ordinance or Option #2 remand the Ordinance back to the Planning Commission for further recommendations.
BACKGROUND
Housing Element Program, H-C-3-b, Anti-Displacement Strategy
What is displacement?
Displacement is a situation in which households are forced involuntarily to move out of their homes for economic or physical reasons (because of eviction, rent increase, demolition of existing housing, etc.) or are prevented from moving into a neighborhood (i.e., excluded) because of high rents or other conditions they are unable to control or prevent.
What is an Anti-Displacement Strategy?
Anti-displacement strategies can be defined as policies, strategies, programs, and laws that intend to counteract the displacement pressures felt by some households.
To counter displacement, staff has identified three (3) goals, including:
1.PROTECT tenants from displacement, especially the most vulnerable.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
118
2.PRESERVE the affordable housing stock, both rental and ownership.
3.PRODUCE more affordable housing stock.
Anti-displacement strategies can be short-term or long-term (see Figure 1).
Fig 1: Anti-Displacement Strategies
City’s Below Market Rate (BMR) program
The Community Development Department (CDD) oversees Affordable Housing programs, including Deed-Restricted Ownership Units, the BMR program, the Existing Unit Purchase Program (EUPP), the HIP Home Sharing Program, and the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. The BMR program covers all rental and ownership properties subject to an affordable housing deed restriction or agreement that restricts units to extremely low, very low, moderate, or workforce units.
Table 1: Foster City BMR Units
Name of
Development
Total
Properties
BMR
Rentals
Workforce
Rentals
Senior
BMR
Rentals
Total
BMR
Rental
Units
BMR-
Owner
Occupied
Units
The Plaza 1 60 60
The Triton 1 48 48
100 Grand 1 33 33
Miramar 1 48 48
Marlin Cove 1 84 84
The Pilgrim 1 14 8 22
Alma Point 1 65 65
Metro Center 1 60 60
EUPP
Homes
4 6 6
Emerald Bay 7 7
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
119
Total Units 19 293 8 125 426 7
The BMR rental program also previously included Foster’s Landing (74 units), for which deed restricted requirement expired in phases between 2021 and 2023.
It should be noted that Foster City has approximately 12,000 housing units, approximately 50% of which are rental units. The BMR rental program includes 426 of the approximate total of 6,000 rental units within the City.
While the term “Anti-Displacement Strategy” might be new, it should be noted that over the years, the City has implemented several anti-displacement strategies as part of its BMR program, State law requirements, Foster City Municipal Code regulations, and Housing Element Implementation Programs.
Table 2 includes existing Anti-Displacement measures/policies that are part of the City’s current BMR Administrative Guidelines (BMR Guidelines), Foster City Municipal Code (FCMC), and Housing Element 2023-31 (HE). These include both short-term and long-term strategies.
Table 2. Existing Anti-Displacement Measures/Policies
Strategy Location Short-term or
Long Term
Goal
1 Affordable Housing Commercial
Linkage Fee FCMC Chapter 17.88 Long Term Preserve and
Produce
2 Amend Percentage of BMR Units
in Conversions Housing Element Long Term Protect
3 Annual Occupancy Monitoring BMR Guidelines Short-term Protect 4 Annual Rent Increase BMR Guidelines Short-term Protect 5 Condominium Conversion
Regulation and Condo
Conversion Restrictions
Housing Element,
FCMC Chapter 17.76 Long Term Preserve
6 Continue to Monitor Expiration of
Rental Affordability Covenants Housing Element Long Term Protect 7 Density Bonus
FCMC Chapter 17.86,
and State Law,
including AB 1287
Long Term Produce
8 Duty to Disclose Complaints or
Legal Action Taken by a Tenant BMR Guidelines Short-term Protect 9 Encourage Rehabilitation of
Existing Housing Housing Element Short and Long
Term Protect
10 Facilitate Non-Profit
Rehabilitation/Maintenance
Assistance
Housing Element Short and Long
Term Protect
11 Housing Overlay Zones FCMC Chapter 17.92
and Chapter 17.94 Long Term Produce
12 Housing Rehab programs Housing Element Long Term Protect and Preserve
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
120
13 Housing Trust Fund City Council
Resolution 2024-9 Long Term Preserve and
Produce
14 Inclusionary Zoning FCMC Chapter 17.90 Long Term Produce 15 Monitor Affordable Housing
Regulatory Agreements Housing Element Long Term Protect 16 Minimum Lease Term BMR Guidelines Short-term Protect 17 Next Available Unit Rule BMR Guidelines Short-term Protect 18 NOFAs for Affordable Housing Housing Element Short and Long Term
Protect and
Produce
19 Permit streamlining/fee reduction Housing Element Long Term Produce 20 Reduce barriers to ADUs Housing Element,
FCMC Chapter 17.78 Long Term Produce
21 Remove governmental
constraints Housing Element Long Term Produce
22 Replacement Unit Requirements Housing Element,
FCMC Chapter 17.55 Long Term Produce
ANALYSIS
September 16, 2024, City Council Study Session
On September 16, 2024, the City Council held a Study Session on the Anti-Displacement Strategy as part of the adopted 2023-31 Housing Element implementation programs (see Link). Staff discussed and presented a few new strategies for Council’s consideration, including the following strategies. Please refer to the staff report of the September 16, 2024 City Council meeting for additional details.
1. Tenant and Landlord Education and Outreach for all Rental Units Providing tenants and landlords (both BMR and market-rate units) with access to education and outreach helps prevent displacement and eviction.
Staff recommended that tenant and landlord education and outreach for all rental units (BMR and market-rate units) be part of the anti-displacement strategy.
2. No Fault Evictions for BMR units only
California law restricts a landlord’s ability to terminate a residential lease, evict the tenant, and retake possession of the property. When a tenant has lawfully occupied the residential property for 12 months or more, the landlord is prohibited from ending the tenancy without “just cause.”
California’s Tenant Protection Act defines two (2) types of “just cause,” including:
“At fault” refers to situations where the tenant has failed or refused to comply with the lease or other tenant duties imposed by law. A tenant may be at fault for these violations:
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
121
oNonpayment of rent due
oA material breach of the lease or rental agreement
oCommitting or allowing criminal activity on the premises oCausing or allowing the property to be damaged
oCausing or allowing a nuisance on the property
oFailing to surrender the premises after giving notice of intent to vacate “No fault,” where the reason for termination is not within the tenants’ control. Each kind of cause is treated differently under the law.
oThe owner reclaiming the property as his or her personal residence. oThe owner removing the property from the rental market. oAn order to vacate by a governmental authority having jurisdiction over the property.
oThe owner intending to demolish or substantially renovate the premises within a short time period.
In these no-fault situations, the tenant cannot stop the lease termination. However, the landlord is required to provide the tenant with relocation assistance. The landlord must either pay the tenant a sum equal to one month of the rental price or waive the rent payment due in the final month of occupancy.
Note: The Tenant Protection Act/AB 1482 excludes affordable housing /BMR units, single-family homes (with exceptions), townhomes, and condominiums (with exceptions).
Staff recommended that the City extend AB 1482’s “No Fault Evictions” provisions to BMR units as part of the anti-displacement strategy. This means that when a BMR tenant has lawfully occupied the BMR unit for 12 months or more, the landlord is prohibited from ending the tenancy without “just cause,” as discussed above.
3. Tenant Relocation Payment for “No Fault Lease Termination” for BMR units only
Tenant relocation payments can be a tool to provide a financial cushion to cover the costs associated with moving, such as hiring movers, security deposits for a new unit, and other unexpected expenses. Under the provisions of AB 1482, for cause evictions (for example, removal of a unit from the market due to required repairs or rehabilitation), the relocation assistance must equal the initial rent charge, which represents one month’s rent. It should be noted that BMR units are not subject to AB 1482.
Staff recommended that the City apply a minimum tenant relocation payment to BMR tenants as required for “No Fault Lease Termination” under AB 1482. The Council has the discretion to increase the payment amount to more than one month's rent.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
122
Staff sought Council direction if the recommended strategies, 1-3 discussed above, be included in the Anti-Displacement Strategy document.
4. Staff also discussed the following existing Anti-Displacement Strategies in BMR Guidelines:
a. Annual Rent Increases (section 8.4): The BMR Guidelines include the following for rent increases for BMR units: For BMR properties built before the effective date of these BMR Guidelines (December 18, 2023), the City strongly recommends as a best practice that annual rent increases for BMR units be limited to the lower of the Maximum Chargeable Rent or 5%, unless otherwise limited by statute at the local, state, or federal level or as required by the financing entity or bond program for a property or as stated in the property’s regulatory agreement. For BMR properties built after the effective date of these BMR Guidelines, annual rent increases for BMR units are limited to the lower of the Maximum Chargeable Rent or 5%, unless otherwise limited by statute at the local, state, or federal level or as required by the financing entity or bond program for a property.
b. Minimum Lease Term (section 9.1.6): The BMR Guidelines includes that the Initial leases must be offered to the Tenant for at least 12 months. Renewals may be month to month or annual or as required by the property’s affordability restrictions, or local, state, or federal regulation.
c. Duty to Disclose Complaints or Legal Action Taken by a Tenant (section 10.11):
Property Managers shall notify the City of any legal action pursued by a Tenant regarding Fair Housing, discrimination, landlord-tenant disputes, or compliance with the property's affordability restriction or these BMR Guidelines. d. Next Available Unit Rule (Section 7.10.4): If a Tenant’s income falls below the income limit for a lower affordability category, they may go on the Waitlist in the appropriate preference category and application date for a unit of a lower affordability level, if permitted by property’s affordability restrictions or Regulatory Agreement. When a unit is available, the Tenant’s unit may be reclassified for the lower affordability level and the next available unit may be classified with the higher affordability level so that the tenant does not need to move units. e. Annual Occupancy Monitoring (Section 7.14.2): Households must complete a Household Composition Form annually for recertification and all two- and three- bedroom households must complete an Under-Occupancy Agreement form at move-in. In the event that the property manager is unable to verify the occupancy of one or more household members due to a lack of tenant cooperation or incomplete or inaccurate documentation, the tenant’s household size will be certified only for the verified occupants. The tenant may be required to move to an appropriately sized unit if the tenant is under the minimum occupancy requirement for the unit.
Staff sought Council direction if the City should extend the current BMR policy of a maximum rent increase of 5% to existing BMR units or change the BMR Guidelines to
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
123
match AB 1482 and apply to all BMR units (both existing and future) to a maximum rent increase of 5% plus CPI or 10%, whichever is lower.
Lastly, staff sought Council direction on whether the Anti-Displacement Strategy should be encouraged on a voluntary basis or established as a mandate for BMR landlords/property managers. If the latter, the strategies must be codified in the Zoning Code Ordinance. Any such mandate would require staffing resources for enforcement.
After deliberation, the City Council provided direction to staff as follows (see link for meeting minutes):
1. Include the following recommended strategies in the Anti-Displacement Strategy document:
a. Tenant and landlord education and outreach for all rental units. b. Extend AB 1482’s “No Fault Just Cause” lease termination provisions to BMR units.
c. Apply a minimum tenant relocation payment equal to three months' rent according to published U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fair Market Rent (FMR) rates to BMR tenants as required for “No Fault Just Cause” lease terminations.
2. Change the BMR Guidelines to apply to all BMR rental units (both existing and future) to a maximum rent increase of 5%; and
3. Establish the Anti-Displacement Strategy as a mandate for BMR landlords/property managers and codify the strategies in an Ordinance.
During public comments, a member of the public provided information about research on the history of redlining in Foster City as it pertains to displacement and the need for district elections.
Based on Council’s direction, staff prepared the proposed Ordinance amendments, including new definitions in section 17.90.020 and two (2) new sections in Chapter 17.90.
Please see Attachment 1 for proposed provisions in detail.
Table 3 – Summary of Proposed Ordinance Amendments
Section Provisions
17.90.020
Definitions
New Definitions:
•At-fault just cause
•No-fault just cause
•Rent,
•Gross Rent
17.90.130,
Just Cause
Evictions
Adds provisions that a property owner that seeks to terminate a BMR tenancy for no-fault shall provide for “Tenant Relocation Assistance.”
17.90.140 •Includes the requirements for relocation assistance, including the requirement that a property owner file a relocation application
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
124
with the Director and notify the tenants within 30 days of filing the application.
•Furthermore, it adds a provision that within 15 days of the approval of the relocation application, the property owner shall provide a written notice of termination to the affected tenants. •It sets the amount of relocation assistance to three (3) months' rent based on the most recent Department of Housing and Urban Development's Fair Market Rent calculation for San Mateo County for a similar-sized unit with the same number of bedrooms.
•The section also notes that if the BMR tenant fails to vacate after the expiration of the notice to terminate the tenancy, the actual amount of any relocation assistance or rent waiver provided pursuant to this subdivision shall be recoverable as damages in an action to recover possession.
Housing Element Program, H-G-2-e, Rental Registry
As mentioned above, CDD oversees Affordable Housing programs, including Deed- Restricted Ownership Units, the BMR program, the Existing Unit Purchase Program (EUPP), the HIP Home Sharing Program, and the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program.
The BMR program covers all rental and ownership properties subject to an affordable housing deed restriction or agreement that restricts units to extremely low, very low, moderate, or workforce units.
It is important to understand what management of the BMR program includes. •For rental properties not owned by the City – Annual audits, training BMR property managers, ensuring compliance with regulatory agreements for each property approval of utility allowances and annual rent and income limits, updating and assisting BMR property managers with interpretation of the BMR Guidelines, updating the BMR Guidelines as needed, and addressing inquiries from BMR tenants and members of the public.
•For rental properties owned by the City (managed by HIP Housing) – In addition to all the above, managing the operating budgets and payment of expenses, managing property management contracts, and applying for and administering grants and notices of funding opportunities.
•For owner-occupied BMR units – Monitor occupancy requirements and obtain annual occupancy affidavits from homeowners, notify homeowners of regulatory agreement expiration dates, calculate sales price and review sales of properties to other qualified buyers (if applicable), certify incomes of new buyers (if applicable), calculate share of proceeds to the City when and if a sale occurs after the expiration of the BMR agreement; revise the BMR Ownership Guidelines, and address inquiries from homeowners and members of the public.
Annual Audit of BMR Properties
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
125
Each year, BMR property managers of all BMR rental properties (including HIP Housing, which manages City-owned BMR rentals) submit reports to the City with data for each tenant, including income, rent, size of the unit, household size, utility allowances, and the maximum rent and income for each size of the unit. Reports are due at varying times of the year, depending on the regulatory agreements. During an audit, staff reviews the requirements of the property’s regulatory agreements and reviews the annual report and tenant files to ensure compliance with BMR Guidelines and regulatory agreements for each property.
During an audit, Staff completes the following for each property:
•Verifies that the report was submitted by the deadline. •Reviews the report against annual maximum income and rent limits. •Verifies that the correct utility allowances were used. •Review tenant files to ensure that incomes were calculated correctly, files contain required application, lease, and income certification documentation, and that files match the annual report. Staff generally selects a percentage of files from each affordability category and size of the unit as well as recent move-in files. •Review the properties’ income certification procedures, manuals, and forms.
Since 2009, the City has contracted with Housing Compliance Services for a license agreement to use software for monitoring BMR units called FOCUS. The software is used by public agencies and developers to monitor BMR units and ensure compliance of income limits and rental rates with local, state, and/or federal BMR programs. Over the years, the number of BMR properties has increased. The City requires property managers of all BMR rental properties to use FOCUS to submit annual reports. BMR property managers enter information into the FOCUS software each year for each unit, including affordability level, rental rate, utility allowance, maximum rent, household size, number of bedrooms, unit number, initial move-in date, household income at move-in, voucher amount, if applicable, whether the unit is occupied or vacant, and income from the latest income certification. The data is entered once per year. The software does not provide reports comparing data from year to year, including turnovers, or rent increases, or comparisons among or between properties as they occur.
Difference between Rental Registry and Rental Registry Program A Rental Registry is essentially a database containing information about rental properties and units, such as rental rates, apartment sizes, vacancies, utilities, and property contact information. The use of a Rental Registry varies by jurisdiction and can be tailored to a jurisdiction’s needs. A Rental Registry provides accurate real-time data on rental housing tenure and rental units by structure size and serves as a tool to identify the locations of older buildings where displacement due to rehabilitation is at higher risk. This information would be useful for applying for grants for developer loan programs and other financial assistance programs, such as tenant relocation assistance programs.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
126
A Rental Registry program is established via an Ordinance and becomes a mandate. Many California cities have Rental Registry programs in place to mandate the collection of data to monitor rental properties (see Attachment 3) and ensure compliance with local and state regulations.
Cost of Rental Registry Software
After the City Council’s approval ( see Agenda Item 5.5 in the link) , the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for BMR Compliance software and professional services to administer a potential Rental Registry program on August 20, 2024, with a due date of September 10, 2024. Staff received four (4) responses, including Tolemi, HdL Companies, Deckard Technologies, and 3Di. Set-up costs ranged from $20,000 to $60,000, and annual subscription costs ranged from $15,000 to $31,000. Please note that staff will bring this item to the City Council at a future meeting date pending approval of the Ordinance.
October 7, 2024, City Council Study Session
On October 7, 2024, the City Council held a Study Session on the Rental Registry Program (see link to Meeting Minutes). Staff sought Council direction on the following options:
1. Expand the provisions of the existing Compliance software for BMR rental units to include real-time, accurate data, and data and analytics capabilities on vacancies, lease terminations, and rent increases (426 BMR rental units)
2. Extend the provisions of the existing BMR Compliance software, with additional data collection at the Council’s discretion as listed above in Item (1), to Foster City multi- family rentals of three or more units (approximately 4,700 units) to provide a comprehensive database of rental properties, units, vacancies, and rental rates.
3. Extend the provisions of the existing BMR Compliance software, with additional data collection at the Council’s discretion as listed above in Item (1) to all Foster City BMR and market rate rental units (approximately 6,000 units) to provide a comprehensive database of BMR and market rate rental properties, units, vacancies, and rental rates.
4. Should the selected option by the City Council be encouraged on a voluntary basis or established as a mandate? Any such mandate would require the adoption of an Ordinance.
During public comment, a member of the public stated that he agreed with the City Council in starting small and focusing on BMR units and mentioned that uncollected transit occupancy tax from short-term rentals is another issue that his firm can assist with and could be part of a rental registry. Another member of the public advocated for a wider rental registry to help get ready for the next Housing Element and reiterated that transit occupancy tax is something that rental registry software could help identify.
After deliberation, a majority of the City Council, via Minute Order No. 1998 ( see link), directed staff to establish a mandate to expand the provisions of the existing BMR Compliance software for BMR units to provide additional data collection and analysis (Option 1 and Option 4, mandate, see link to Meeting Minutes). (Motion by Councilmember Hindi, seconded by Mayor Sullivan, and carried, 4-1-0, Vice Mayor
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
127
Jimenez voted “no,” adopting Minute Order No. 1998, directing staff to establish a mandate to expand the provisions of the existing Below Market Rate (BMR) Compliance software for BMR units to provide for additional data collection and analysis.) Based on the Council’s direction, staff prepared the proposed Ordinance including a definition for “Rent Registry Information” and a new section 17.90.150, “Registration of Below Market Rate Units.” Please see Attachment 1 for draft provisions in detail.
Table 4 – Summary of Proposed Amendments to Chapter 17.90 relating to Rental Registry Section Provisions
17.90.020
Definitions
New Definition:
•Rent Registry Information
17.90.150,
Registration
of Below
Market Rate
Units
The new section outlines the requirements for initial registration, registration renewal, and registration amendment. The section also outlines the required information for registration, including Property information, contact information, number of BMR units per building, size of the BMR unit, number of bedrooms in the unit, rent for the BMR unit, and so on.
Planning Commission Hearing on March 6, 2025
On March 6, 2025, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to review the draft ordinance ( see link to Meeting video). After deliberation, a motion was made by Commissioner Pedro, seconded by Commissioner Jagtiani, to deny recommendation of City Council acceptance of the Amendment to Chapter 17.90, Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program of the Foster City Municipal Code, passed by roll call 3-2- 0-0 (Noes: Stoveland, Chair Haddad). Please refer to Attachment 2 for detailed Planning Commission’s minutes that constitute as a report to the City Council.
Comments by the three (3) Commissioners who were not in favor of the amendments as proposed are summarized below:
•Commissioner Pedro questioned why the Ordinance went beyond the provisions of AB 1482, specifically three months of HUD Fair Market Rent for relocation as compared to one month and the proposed 5% rent increase cap. He recommended that the City follow the State Law, AB 1482, as it would keep everything clean. He added that property managers and housing providers are having a hard time ensuring that they comply with each City. He asked if the staff has researched FDIC and other federal bank regulators, and if so, what are their comments regarding rent- controlled assets with the loss of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank. He noted that FDIC identified rent-controlled assets as ‘toxic’ after reviewing the balance sheet of the financial institutions. He raised his concern that if this is the Federal Government’s stance, banks will have fewer of these assets in their portfolio on their balance sheet, which will lead to a significant impact on the
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
128
lender’s ability to finance these projects. He continued that if rent controls and restrictions on properties persist, there will be no one to buy them or provide financing. Additionally, it is more important that the policy is correct. He offered revisiting through more Study Sessions and discussing with builders, investors, and tenants to have a feel for what people are willing to adapt to. •Commissioner Jagtiani asked who would bear the administrative cost of maintaining the rental registry. He agreed that the city needs more housing production but raised concerns that additional costs could either be passed on or make financing harder.
He stated that putting a 5% cap on the rent increase will impact housing production and ultimately impact housing costs.
•Commissioner Kenkre agreed to keep things simple and supported aligning with AB 1482.
Comments by other two (2) Commissioners who were in favor of the amendments as proposed are summarized below:
•Commissioner Stoveland acknowledged that Foster City has made efforts to make development easier for builders in the past and questioned whether this Ordinance might discourage development but concluded that the greater good is served by encouraging the production of more BMR units. Referring to the Council’s decision to require three months of relocation assistance, he asked if any other cities required more than three months. He emphasized that the City only has 426 BMR units out of 12,000 rentals (a small percentage). He supported forwarding the Ordinance to the Council as proposed.
•Chair Haddad asked staff if the City Council had considered simply adopting AB 1482 rather than expanding. He voted against the motion to deny the recommendation to the City Council.
Public Comments during Planning Commission Public Hearing •A member of the public offered his support of rental registries to provide accurate data to aid in better decision-making in the future and expressed concern about not adhering to Foster City's Housing Element.
•A representative from the San Mateo County Association of Realtors, addressed the Planning Commission via teleconference and stated to not go beyond State laws, including AB 1482 and Senate Bill 567. He cited Proposition 33, which was defeated on November 5th, that addressed numerous rent control type measures and provided an example of a State Legislature rejecting four bills that dealt with rental registries on a statewide basis. Additionally, he expressed concern about increasing taxpayer costs.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
129
Staff Comments
Staff has considered the Planning Commission’s comments and has the following response.
•The Planning Commission serves as an advisory body to the City Council and makes recommendations to the City Council on land use and policy matters when acting in a legislative capacity. The Commission’s role is to consider staff analysis, and the Council’s goals and policies, along with community input. The City Council, as a governing body, considers staff analysis, Planning Commission decisions/recommendations and balances City’s goals and community input while setting policy. Given the Council’s role in setting policy, staff has typically sought Council direction at study sessions prior to requesting Planning Commission action.
This ensures alignment with the two bodies on City goals and objectives. While staff understand the Commission’s position on the proposed matter, it is up to the City Council to decide whether they’d like to move forward with the proposed ordinance as drafted or send it back to the Planning Commission.
•Staff would like to point out that during the September 16, 2024, Study Session on anti-displacement strategies, staff recommended mirroring AB 1482 requirements for BMR units to provide protection for BMR units that are currently not covered by AB 1482 in order to meet the goals of the Housing Element. However, after a robust discussion, a majority of the Council provided direction to staff to “Apply a minimum tenant relocation payment equal to three months' rent according to published U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fair Market Rent (FMR) rates to BMR tenants as required for “No Fault Just Cause” lease terminations.” Staff’s position is that the recommendation to mirror AB 1482 provides protection adequate to meet the goals of the Housing Element and that any expansion of benefits beyond those provided in AB 1482 is a policy decision to be determined by the City Council.
For the Rental Registry Study Session on October 7, 2024, staff recommended a rental registry program for BMR units only. The majority of the Council voted on October 7, 2024, to expand the rental registry software for BMR units only and to mandate the program through an Ordinance. Staff’s recommendations were noted in the Planning Commission Staff Report. Given that BMR tenants are most vulnerable to the risk of displacement, a rental registry for BMR units only would provide valuable data on BMR units to assist staff in monitoring the BMR units and the provisions of the Anti-Displacement Strategy.
However, it is up to the City Council to decide whether they would like to move forward with the proposed Ordinance as drafted or send it back to the Planning Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lastly, staff would also like to address the issue of “Rent Control.” Rent Control is not part of this proposed Ordinance. It shall be noted that the City's existing BMR guidelines ( link)
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
130
already has provisions for "Annual Rent Increases.” The existing BMR Guidelines Section
8.4.1 addresses rent increases:
Section 8.4.1 Anti-Displacement Strategy
For BMR properties built before the effective date of these BMR Guidelines, the City strongly recommends as a best practice that annual rent increases for BMR units be limited to the lower of the Maximum Chargeable Rent or 5%, unless otherwise limited by statute at the local, state, or federal level or as required by the financing entity or bond program for a property or as stated in the property’s regulatory agreement.
For BMR properties built after the effective date of these BMR Guidelines, annual rent increases for BMR units are limited to the lower of the Maximum Chargeable Rent or 5%, unless otherwise limited by statute at the local, state, or federal level or as required by the financing entity or bond program for a property.
At the City Council Study Session on September 16, 2024 (see this link for meeting details), as part of the discussion on anti-displacement strategies that are part of the City's BMR guidelines, the City Council considered the following revisions to the Annual rent increase:
• Extend the current BMR policy of a maximum rent increase of 5% to existing BMR units, or
• Changing the BMR Guidelines to match AB 1482 and apply to all BMR units (both existing and future) to a maximum rent increase of 5% plus CPI, or 10%, whichever is lower.
After deliberation, the City Council provided direction to staff (see link for meeting minutes), to revise the BMR Guidelines to apply to all BMR rental units (both existing and future) to a maximum rent increase of 5%.
As per the City Council’s direction, staff need to amend the BMR guidelines as noted above. However, the maximum rent increase of 5% for BRM rental units is not a part of the draft Ordinance presented to the Council. City staff is working on ensuring that the Council direction can be implemented in a manner that is consistent with the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and will bring an item at a future meeting per the Council’s direction.
California Environmental Quality Act
The proposed actions would update the City’s existing Municipal Code. The actions would not result in physical changes to the environment and would be exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to this item except for the staff time spent on the preparation of the Ordinance. Depending on the policy direction provided by the Council related to the Rental Registry, staff will bring a future item that will discuss the fiscal impact pertaining to Rental Registry software.
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
131
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Smart Planning, Development, and the Local Economy
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Meeting Minutes from March 6, 2025, Planning Commission Hearing Attachment 3 – Research from other jurisdictions
7.2 7.2 Staff Report
132
3 2
1 3
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOSTER AMENDING CHAPTER 17.90, “BELOW MARKET RATE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM,” WITHIN TITLE 17, “ZONING,” SECTION 17.90.020, “DEFINITIONS,” AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 17.90.130, “JUST CAUSE EVICTIONS” AND 17.90.140, “TENANT RELOCATION ASSISTANCE”; AND 17.90.150, “REGISTRY OF BELOW MARKET RATE UNITS,” TO IMPLEMENT HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM H-C-3-B, ANTI-DISPLACEMENT STRATEGY AND PROGRAM H-G-2-E, RENTAL REGISTRY, AND FINDING ORDINANCE EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINE SECTION 15061(B)(3)
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, Foster City’s Housing Element 2023-2031 includes Policy H-C-3-b, Anti-Displacement Strategy (page HE-90), which provides that the City will develop an anti-displacement strategy, including assessment of a variety of tenant protection measures to determine if appropriate for Foster City, including but not limited to: a) expansion of relocation benefits beyond those required by California law for landlords to pay to lower-income tenants to also apply to moderate-income tenants: b) expansion of the amount of relocation benefits beyond those required by California law for lower- income tenants; c) minimum lease terms; d) required notifications to tenants and landlords of legal requirements; and e) expansion of any other relocation/anti- displacement provisions; and
WHEREAS, Civil Code section 1946.2(d)(1) specifies that property owners are required to provide relocation assistance to tenants who are evicted for “no-fault” reasons, and authorizes local agencies to enact regulations that are “more protective” than provided for in State law. Under Civil Code section 1946.2(d)(3), relocation assistance is equivalent to one-month current rent and can be exchanged for waiving the last month’s rent; and
WHEREAS, the City’s adopted Housing Element 2023-31 includes as a priority for the Fair Housing Action Plan the protection of tenants from displacement through an anti-displacement strategy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a study session on September 16, 2024 and provided direction to staff, among other things to incorporate the following in the City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy:
1. Require “for cause” evictions for BMR units.
2. Require three-month tenant relocation assistance for “no-fault” evictions for BMR units.
3. Provide education and outreach to all renters and landlords; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a study session on October 7, 2024 and by Minute Order No. 1998, directing staff to establish a mandate to expand the provisions
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
133
3 2
1 3
of the existing Below Market Rate (BMR) Compliance software for BMR units to provide for additional data collection and analysis; and
WHEREAS, 42.9 percent of all households in Foster City are renter households; and
WHEREAS, approximately 433 are BMR units; and
WHEREAS, BMR tenants are statutorily exempt from eviction protections under Civil Code section 1946.2, and are thus vulnerable to facing evictions; and WHEREAS, on March 06, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider amending Chapter
17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program,” within Title 17, “Zoning,” section 17.90.020, “Definitions,” and to add new sections 17.90.130, “Just Cause Evictions” and 17.90.140, “Tenant Relocation Assistance”; and 17.90.150, “Registry of Below Market Rate Units,” to implement Housing Element program H-C-3-b, Anti- Displacement Strategy and program H-G-2-e, Rental Registry, and CEQA finding, and after conducting the public hearing recommended by a vote of 3-2 that the City Council deny adoption of this Ordinance and CEQA finding; and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 2025, a Notice of Public Hearing was duly posted for consideration of the amendment to Title 17, Zoning, amending Chapter 17.90, and the related CEQA finding, for the City Council public hearing on April 21, 2025; and WHEREAS, the draft meeting minutes from the Planning Commission public meeting constitute the Commission’s report to the City Council pursuant to Section
17.74.060 of Foster City Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing where it carefully reviewed and considered the staff report and all attachments thereto, including the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the proposed amendment to Title 17 Zoning of the Foster City Municipal Code, amending Chapter
17.90, Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program, as referenced above, as well as the proposed CEQA finding, including any and all timely submitted correspondence, all information submitted at or prior to the public hearing, and all public comment and testimony presented at the public hearing (collectively, the “Record”).
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine based upon the aforementioned Record as follows:
1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
2. The proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
134
3 2
1 3
3. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan through the implementation of the Housing Element.
4. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City.
5. The Ordinance is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty to have no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment as these are administrative matters.
Section 2. Amendment. Section 17.90.020, “Definitions” of Chapter 17.90 within Title 17, “Zoning” is hereby amended to add the following definitions:
“At-fault just cause” shall have the same meaning as specified in California Civil Code section 1946.2(b)(1), as may be amended.”
“No-fault just cause” shall have the same meaning as specified in California Civil Code section 1946.2(b)(2), as may be amended.”
“Rent, also called “net rent” or “tenant rent” or “net tenant rent” means a fixed periodic compensation paid by a Tenant at fixed intervals to a property owner for the possession and use of a Rental Unit as provided by the rental agreement between the property owner and Tenant. Rent excludes pass through costs and ancillary costs paid separately to the property owner or a third party for parking, storage, utilities, water, garbage, or any other fee or charge associated with a BMR unit.
“Gross Rent” means a fixed periodic compensation paid by a Tenant at fixed intervals to a property owner for the possession and use of a Rental Unit as provided by the rental agreement between the property owner and Tenant. Gross Rent includes pass through costs and ancillary costs paid separately to the property owner or a third party for parking, storage, utilities, water, garbage, or any other fee or charge associated with a BMR unit and required for all BMR tenants.
“Rent Registry Information” means the information required to be submitted to the City by a property owner pursuant to Section 17.90.150.
Section 3. Amendment. Chapter 17.90, “Below Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program” within Title 17, “Zoning” is hereby amended to add new sections 17.90.130 “Just Cause Evictions,” 17.90.140 “Tenant Relocation Assistance,” and 17.90.150, “Registration of Below Market Rate units” to read as follows:
“17.90.130 “No Fault” Evictions
A. A property owner that seeks to terminate a Below market rate tenancy for no-fault just cause, shall comply with the tenant relocation assistance requirements described in section 17.90.140.
B. A property owner that seeks to terminate a Below market rate tenancy for at-fault just cause is not required to comply with the tenant relocation assistance requirements in section 17.90.140.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
135
3 2
1 3
17.90.140 Tenant Relocation Assistance
The property owner of a Below market rate dwelling unit shall provide relocation assistance to any tenant renting a Below market rate dwelling unit for no-fault just cause evictions in accordance with the following requirements:
A. A relocation application shall be submitted by the property owner to the Director.
Concurrent with the filing of an application, the property owner shall provide the Director with the address number of each unit in the rental development, the monthly rents for those units and the names of every member of the residential household who is a signatory on a written lease or rental agreement for that unit, the household income as shown on the lease or rental agreement and the number of household members included on the lease or rental agreement. Where there is no written lease or rental agreement, the property owner shall provide the name of every person the property owner considers to be a resident under an oral lease or rental agreement.
B. Notice of Intent. No later than thirty (30) days after filing an application, either the property owner or the property owner’s agent shall notify each residential household residing in the Below market rate housing unit that the property owner has filed an application with the City. The notice shall be sent by regular and certified mail and posted on the door of each rental unit. The property owner must submit evidence of compliance with this section to the City in order for the application to be deemed complete. For each such notice, the property owner shall use a notice of intent form provided by the Director that shall contain the following information:
1. The name and address of the current property owner and the project developer;
2. A description of the application(s) being filed and a general time frame to complete the work described in the application;
3. An explanation of the relocation assistance available to eligible residential households and special-circumstances households, information on eligible residential household incomes and the procedure for submitting claims for relocation assistance;
4. Contact information for the relocation consultant that will be assisting with the relocation assistance process. This contact information and a brief explanation of the purpose of the notice shall also be translated into other languages as provided by the City;
5. The Below market rate dwelling unit’s right to receive written notice for each hearing and right to appear and be heard at land use hearing, if applicable; and
6. Other information deemed necessary or desirable by the Director.
C. Notice of Intent Verification. The property owner or property owner’s agent shall submit to the City a duplicate copy of the notice of intent form given to each Below market rate unit and a declaration indicating that each notice was sent by regular and certified mail and posted on the door of the rental unit.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
136
3 2
1 3
D. Notice of Application Approval. No later than fifteen (15) days after receiving final approval of a project application (including any appeal period), the property owner or property owner’s agent shall notify each residential household residing on the subject real property that the application has been approved. The notice shall be sent by regular and certified mail and posted on the door of each rental unit.
E. Notice of Termination. Property owner shall provide a written notice of termination to all Below market rate tenants subject to displacement pursuant to Civil Code Section 1946.1 and 1946.2.
F. The cash equivalent of three (3) months' rent shall be paid to the residential household renting a Below market rate dwelling unit that is being relocated. The amount to be paid shall be calculated at the time the relocation application is approved by the City based on the most recent Department of Housing and Urban Development's Fair Market Rent calculation for San Mateo County for a similar-sized unit with the same number of bedrooms.
G. Relocation Assistance Point of Contact. In addition to the three months’ rent payment, the City shall select a relocation consultant who will answer questions from tenants and provide assistance to tenants to locate alternative Below market rate units.
Property owner shall pay the fees for the relocation consultant and shall deposit sufficient funds with the third-party agency and/or City (as determined by the Director) when an application is filed to cover the estimated cost of the relocation assistance services. The relocation consultant shall provide in-language assistance in languages designated by the City, as necessary, and hold an informational meeting with tenants, respond to questions, verify current household incomes, disperse checks to eligible households and provide an accounting of dispersed funds to the property owner and City.
H. Payments Escrow Account. The property owner shall open an escrow account with an entity qualified to provide escrow services within the State of California and deposit relocation assistance funds into that account no later than thirty (30) days after filing an application with the Director that will be used by the relocation consultant for relocation assistance payments to the Below market rate tenants who received a termination notice pursuant to subdivision E of this section. The amount of the deposit shall be determined by the Director or his/her designee and unused funds shall be returned to the property owner after all relocation assistance has been paid as verified by the relocation consultant.
I. Relocation Assistance Claims. Below market rate tenants requesting relocation assistance pursuant to this section must provide the necessary information to the relocation consultant. Below market rate tenants must file a claim before the date to vacate as stated on the notice of termination in order to be eligible for relocation assistance.
J. Administrative Costs. The City shall collect the administrative fee in an amount to be set by resolution of the City Council.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
137
3 2
1 3
K. If a Below market rate tenant fails to vacate after the expiration of the notice to terminate the tenancy, the actual amount of any relocation assistance or rent waiver provided pursuant to this subdivision shall be recoverable as damages in an action to recover possession.
L. The relocation assistance payment required by this section shall be credited against any other relocation assistance required by any other law.”
17.90.150 “Registration of Below Market Rate units”
A. Initial Registration. A property owner must register every below market rate dwelling unit that is subject to the provisions of this Chapter within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the City that registration is required. Registration is complete only when all required information has been provided to the City and all outstanding fees and penalties, if applicable, have been paid. Upon completion of the initial registration of a below market rate dwelling unit, the City shall issue a registration statement, which shall include the renewal date for the registration of the applicable below market rate dwelling units.
B. Registration Renewal. Registration of below market rate dwelling units shall be renewed annually by June 30.
C. The following information specified in this Section 17.90.150.C shall be provided as part of initial and renewal of registration of a below market rate dwelling unit. Failure to provide the information required or providing false information shall be a violation of the Municipal Code, chargeable as a misdemeanor or infraction. The Director shall establish a Rent Registry for below market rate dwelling units BMR units, which shall, at minimum, collect the following information:
(a) Property information, including the Property’s Assessor Parcel Number, year building was built, date of expiration of deed restriction, affordability restrictions, occupancy restrictions, preferences, total number of units, including market rate units; (b) Contact information, including Owner contract information and property manager’s contact information;
(c) The number of BMR units per building;
(d) The number of bedrooms and bathrooms in the BMR unit; (e) The size of the BMR unit, expressed in square feet; (f) The Rent for BMR unit;
(g) The average length of occupancy or vacancy of BMR units, or if a current BMR unit is vacant or occupied.
The Director may request additional information as necessary to administer the below market rate inclusionary housing program.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
138
3 2
1 3
D. Termination of Exemption. When a below market rate dwelling unit that was exempt from this Chapter becomes governed by this Chapter for the first time, the property owner must register the below market rate dwelling unit with the City within thirty (30) days.
E. Registration Amendment. A property owner shall update the registration of a unit if there is a change in occupancy or lease terms for any below market rate dwelling unit within thirty (30) days of the change. Additionally, a property owner shall update their rental registry account within thirty (30) days of a change in a below market rate dwelling unit ownership or management, or a change in the owner's or manager's contact information.
F. Copy of Registration to Tenant. If requested by the City, a property owner shall provide the Tenant(s) with a true and correct copy of the completed registration form that pertains to their below market rate dwelling unit. The property may redact any information that does not pertain to that unit except the name and address of the property owner.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council does hereby declare that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5. Taking Effect. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.
Section 6. Posting. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall have it posted in three (3) public places designated by the City Council.
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
139
3 2
1 3
This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 21st of April, 2025 ,and passed and adopted on the ____ day of ____, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
7.2 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
140
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
REGULAR MEETING AND STUDY SESSION
OF THE FOSTER CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers – 620 Foster City Boulevard – Foster City
M I N U T E S
March 6, 2025
1. CALL TO ORDER
At 7:00 p.m. by Chair Haddad
All votes shall be by roll call due to Commissioner Kenkre participating remotely pursuant to AB 2449, the j ust cause circumstance, as Commissioner Kenkre was traveling on official government business.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Jagtiani, Kenkre, Pedro, Stoveland and Chair Haddad
Staff Present: Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director; Nori Jabba, Housing Coordinator; Helen Telfer, Senior Planner; Kevin McGill, Assistant Planner; Denise Bazzano, Assistant City Attorney
3. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
1. None
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Regular Meeting Minutes from February 20, 2025
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Stoveland, seconded by Commissioner Pedro to approve the Minutes of February 20, 2025 passed by roll call 5-0-0-0.
5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
1. None
6. NEW PUBLIC HEARING
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.90, “BELOW MARKET RATE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM,” WITHIN TITLE 17, “ZONING,” SECTION 17.90.020, “DEFINITIONS,” AND TO ADD NEW SECTIONS
17.90.130, “JUST CAUSE EVICTIONS” AND 17.90.140, “TENANT RELOCATION ASSISTANCE”; AND 17.90.150, “REGISTRY OF BELOW MARKET RATE UNITS,” TO IMPLEMENT HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS H -C-3-B, ANTI -DISPLACEMENT STRATEGY AND H-G-2-E, RENTAL REGISTRY, AND FINDING ORDINANCE EXEMPT
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
141
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINE SECTION 15061(B)(3).
Planning Commissioners had the following questions:
Commissioner Pedro analyzed that Below Market Rate (BMR) recommendations go further than AB 1482 and asked why it reaches beyond the State guidelines.
Housing Coordinator Jabba stated that AB 1482 is one month of rent and City Council recommends three months of the HUD fair market rent, which is equivalent to low to moderate income. She explained that HUD fair market rent would be more equivalent to month of market rent to protect tenants.
Commissioner Pedro added that another area that goes further than AB 1482 would be the five percent restriction on rental increases.
Housing Coordinator Jabba confirmed that the five percent is not in the ordinance but would be handled in the BMR guidelines. She explained further that City Council mirrored the industry standard for BMR rentals of five percent without Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Commissioner Pedro asked if Planning Commission can amend the recommendation or asked if it has to be accepted as is.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano stated that the Planning Commission can take the staff’s recommendation and either approve or deny the recommendation. She added that if the Planning Commission approves the recommendation, they are welcome to add comments or recommendations to the City Council for further consideration.
Commissioner Pedro clarified that it’s either a yes or no on the recommendation. He understood that if they say yes to the recommendation, there would be no guarantee that the City Council will make the recommended changes.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano confirmed and added that the Planning Commission can also recommend that the City Council consider making a change or adding language to the ordinance.
Commissioner Pedro asked what the next steps of the process would be if the Planning Commission decides not to make the recommendation.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano stated that the item can still go to the City Council for their consideration but would have to consider that the Planning Commission did not make the recommendation.
Commissioner Kenkre cited an example that was given regarding the $2,800 in tenant rent. He asked if the tenant is evicted, what is the liability for the landlord, is it $2,800 or will it be the cost of the new unit.
Housing Coordinator Jabba clarified that it is in regard to relocation. She stated that the liability for the landlord is three months at the HUD Fair Market Rent. She added that the landlord is liable for paying for a relocation consultant.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
142
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Commissioner Kenkre asked prior to the meeting if the proposed anti -displacement strategy was only limited to renters or owner-occupied units. He received a response that owner-occupied units will be settled between the lending institution and the homeowner.
Housing Coordinator Jabba added that the anti-displacement strategy only covers the BMR rental units.
Commissioner Jagtiani referred to the rental registry and asked if the property owner or the BMR unit renter will pay for the admin cost in order to provide information on a regular basis to the City.
Housing Coordinator Jabba stated that the property owners are already required to pay for the cost and the time for their staff to input the information as part of their regulatory agreement.
Community Development Director Mangalam noted that we don’t have an agreement in place for the new software as of today as that will be part of the City Council action.
Commissioner Jagtiani asked how many other cities in the Peninsula have a rental registry.
Housing Coordinator Jabba cited that in San Mateo County, Half Moon Bay instituted their rental registry in 2024, and East Palo Alto recently started theirs. She added that outside of San Mateo County, Mountain View and Concord have a rental registry as well.
Commissioner Pedro reiterated that in San Mateo County, there are two cities with a rental registry so far.
Housing Coordinator Jabba confirmed and stated that Half Moon Bay and East Palo Alto are citywide and not only for BMR units.
Commissioner Pedro referenced the HUD value regarding the relocation payment. He indicated that the rent amount determined may be higher than what the tenant is paying.
Housing Coordinator Jabba stated that the HUD number is standard every year. She added that if a tenant had extremely low-income rent, it would likely be less than the HUD Fair Market Rent.
Commissioner Pedro stated the tenant might be receiving several months’ relocation payment.
Housing Coordinator Jabba confirmed that the concept behind that is to make that amount more equivalent to market rate so that they could find housing.
Commissioner Pedro recommended that the City follow with the State Law, AB 1482, as it would keep everything clean. He added that property managers and housing providers are having a hard time with ensuring that they are in compliance with each City.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano noted that the Ordinance that is being presented tonight incorporates the direction received from City Council.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
143
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Commissioner Jagtiani asked if State Law AB 1482 does not cover BMR units.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano confirmed.
Commissioner Pedro emphasized that it would be simpler to say BMR units are now included in AB 1482. He further asked if it would be possible to just adopt the State law and keep it simple.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano clarified that the ordinance that is being presented tonight incorporates the direction that staff has received from City Council and is the reason why it has the provisions that it does.
Commissioner Pedro asked if there is a possibility that City Council would reconsider and just adopt the State law and keep it simple.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano stated that if the majority of the Planning Commissioners want to recommend the ordinance to the City Council with additional considerations of revising the ordinance so that it conforms to AB 1482 or other State law, the Planning Commission can add that note to its recommendation.
Commissioner Pedro clarified that if the Planning Commission is recommending the ordinance with a note, it’s not as strong as an amendment.
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano added that they could recommend not approving the ordinance.
Commissioner Pedro stated that he is leaning in that direction.
Chair Haddad asked if City Council discussed that as an option.
Community Development Director Mangalam stated that as part of the study session, they had a robust discussion on AB 1482 and its provisions.
Commissioner Stoveland commented that there are situations where we have taken great lengths to make things easier for developers to be prepared and either develop or redevelop a property. He had questioned whether this would put a developer over the edge but concluded that the greater good is served by not disincentivizing the developer and to produce more BMR units. He referenced that City Council arrived at a three- month relocation assistance and asked if there are any municipalities in the area that have done greater than three months.
Community Development Director Mangalam referred to the City Council study session and stated that Redwood City has a Relocation Assistance Ordinance of three to four months of fair market rent. She added that Menlo Park has a Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance that requires any landlords that causes permanent displacement of residential households provide eligible residential households with relocation assistance of three months of rent and four months for certain circumstances.
Commissioner Stoveland clarified that we are referring to BMR units being on the rental registry. He inquired that if the City Council approves the new software, the landlords wouldn’t be required to provide the information until the software is in place.
Housing Coordinator Jabba confirmed.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
144
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Commissioner Stoveland asked if there would be a timeline for implementation.
Community Development Director Mangalam noted that there is a target date of next fiscal year. She added that there is no current agreement in place and the action has not been taken to the City Council yet.
Commissioner Stoveland asked if we have gone to a Request for Proposal (RFP) to identify the software.
Community Development Director Mangalam confirmed that it was done last year.
Commissioner Pedro asked if staff has conducted research regarding FDIC and other federal bank regulators, and if so, what are their comments regarding rent-controlled assets with the loss of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank. He noted that FDIC identified rent-controlled assets as ‘toxic’ after reviewing the balance sheet of the financial institutions. He raised his concern that if this is the Federal Government’s stance, banks will have fewer of these assets in their portfolio on their balance sheet and will lead to significant impact on the lender’s ability to finance these projects. He continued that if rent controls and restrictions on properties persist, there will be no one to buy it or provide financing.
Housing Coordinator Jabba explained that BMR units are already rent controlled and are regulated in what the rent can be each year, by way of maximum rent. She added that with the City Council’s direction of a maximum of five percent restriction in rent increase, it makes it more consistent and helps when pro formas are done.
Commissioner Pedro reiterated that if research has been done on how the Federal Regulators will view this in the banking industry and if the financing will be there. He expressed that if we are passing a policy and if there is no accurate data and research behind it, passing the policy may be premature.
Housing Coordinator Jabba responded that research on financial institutions has not been conducted.
Director Mangalam provided examples of Redwood City and Menlo Park displacement requirements.
Commissioner Jagtiani agreed that the city needs more production of housing. He raised concern about adding more costs, such as the rental registry and similar costs will have an impact on financing. He stated that putting a 5% cap on the rent increase will have an impact on production of housing and will ultimately have an impact on the cost of housing.
Commissioner Stoveland confirmed that it will have an impact at the margin. He added that there are plenty of financing vehicles and sources of capital available in the marketplace, particularly for developers of BMR units. He clarified that he is not saying it will be easy but that this is not an unusual tool.
The following people addressed the Planning Commission:
Evan Adams addressed the Planning Commission in person and offered his support of rental registries to provide accurate data to aid in better decision making in the future.
Adams expressed concern about not adhering to Foster City's Housing Element.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
145
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Fernando Peña, representing the San Mateo County Association of Realtors, addressed the Planning Commission via teleconference. Peña stated to not go beyond State laws, including AB 1482 and Senate Bill 567. Peña cited Proposition 33, which was defeated on November 5th that addressed numerous rent control type measures. Peña provided an example of a State Legislature rejecting four bills that dealt with rental registries on a statewide basis. Peña additionally expressed concern about increasing taxpayer costs.
Planning Commissioners had the following comments:
Commissioner Pedro acknowledged that although well intended, he believes it will make it hard for the housing providers to stay in compliance with each city’s code. He proposed a simpler route by sticking to AB1482 for the BMR units.
Commissioner Jagtiani concurred and stated that he does not want to add more costs to housing providers at this time. He furthered that the admin costs are going to eventually be passed on to the consumer or that financing will be tougher if the performance doesn’t meet.
Commissioner Kenkre agreed on keeping things simple.
Commissioner Pedro stated that it is more important that the policy is correct. He offered revisiting through more study sessions and discussing with builders, investors, and tenants to have a feel on what people are willing to adapt to.
Commissioner Stoveland clarified that Foster City has 12,000 rental units and 426 BMR units so that is 1/3 of 1% of the entire units in the City. The strategy has been laid out and indicated that the Planning Commission would have to have a sound reason for not supporting and he supported putting forth the resolution as written.
Commissioner Pedro made a motion not to recommend the resolution for the following reasons:
(1) Regarding the findings in number two [The proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies or programs of the General Plan], Commissioner Pedro emphasized that he doesn’t think the proposed ordinance is consistent with the goals of the city.
(2) Regarding finding number three [The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan through the implementation of the Housing Element] Commissioner Pedro stated he thinks this type of policy will hurt the City’s ability to meet the goals within the Housing Element and within the General Plan.
(3) Regarding finding number four [The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City] Commissioner Pedro stated that he believes if we do not get this housing built per the City’s Housing Element, it will be detrimental to the public interest because the State could come in and force build-by-right. He stated he does not think the citizens of Foster City want to lose local control over what’s built, where, and why.
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Pedro, seconded by Commissioner Jagtiani, to deny
recommendation of City Council acceptance of the Amendment to Chapter 17.90, Below
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
146
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Market Rate Inclusionary Housing Program of the Foster City Municipal Code, passed by roll call 3-2-0-0 (Noes: Stoveland, Chair Haddad).
7. OLD BUSINESS
1. None
8. NEW BUSINESS
1. None
9. STUDY SESSION
1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY SESSION IS TO PROVIDE THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE PUBLIC AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND PROVIDE
INPUT ON A PROPOSED USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW A RECREATIONAL
FACILITY USE INCLUDING TWO AND A HALF HIGH SCHOOL REGULATION- SIZED
BASKETBALL COURTS FOR LOCAL YOUTH CLUB PRACTICES, CAMPS,
TOURNAMENTS, ADULT LEAGUES, AND COMMUNITY EVENTS WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 391 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD – APN:
094-012-220
Planning Commissioners had the following discussion:
Commissioner Jagtiani asked if there is an estimated number of occupants at a given time.
Senior Planner Telfer responded that there is an estimated maximum of 200 children or athletes at any given time with an addition of five staff members. She added that after discussing with the Building Division and Fire Department, maximum capacity will be determined at the plan check review stage, based on the total amount of square footage in the facility space.
Commissioner Jagtiani asked if it will be reflected in the parking analysis.
Senior Planner Telfer confirmed but reiterated that the number will be determined and finalized once the Building Division and Fire Department collaborate on the exact square footage of each type of use on site.
Commissioner Stoveland stated that the plans do not indicate that there are stands for viewing the games and may be a limiter in the amount of people allowed in the building at any one time. He referenced the steel poles that run through the middle of the building and asked if there would be a minimum requirement for safety regarding those.
Senior Planner Telfer mentioned that the Building Division confirmed that there will need to be protection around those poles for safety but ultimately depends on their final scope.
Commissioner Stoveland cited that the applicant is proposing basketball, pickleball , and volleyball and inquired if they will be looking into the clearance heights for these sports.
Senior Planner Telfer had corroborated with the Building Official and confirmed that there are no building code clearance height requirements.
Commissioner Stoveland asked what the existing clearance height is for the building.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
147
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Senior Planner Telfer stated that it is twenty-two feet.
Commissioner Stoveland indicated that the flooring is currently concrete and inquired if it would be a major part of the renovation of the property.
Senior Planner Telfer confirmed that the entire warehouse would be renovated.
Commissioner Stoveland clarified that the property has been vacant since August and that the only interested parties have been for uses of this type.
Senior Planner Telfer stated that there have been eight inquiries about youth facilities and sporting clubs according to the listing agent.
Chair Haddad asked if it is known how long the property will be leased for.
The applicant provided that they are still in contract negotiations and are hoping for five to ten years.
Chair Haddad inquired if offsite parking is limited in the adjacent streets and if it will help in the parking analysis.
Senior Planner Telfer responded that the parking analysis will be required for off -street parking and there will be a required number of parking spaces for this privately-owned site. She added that they cannot rely on on-street public parking for this use.
Chair Haddad asked if there would be space for sitting.
The applicant answered that there are plans to have a two to three row metal bleacher and that it will limit spectators. She added that the use will be for practices and do not anticipate a giant need for spectators. She mentioned that if they do run tournaments, there will be signs that will indicate the limited seating available and will follow occupancy rules.
Commissioner Stoveland cited that there are no proposed changes to the outside of the building and confirmed that the building could return to a warehouse in the future.
Community Development Director Mangalam noted that there could be a sign permit for a wall sign and that it is the only exterior change that they are anticipating for that use.
The following people addressed the Planning Commission:
Evan Adams addressed the Planning Commission in person and expressed concern about potential parking and traffic issues. Adams advised the importance of maintaining warehouse space and the effect of removing such businesses may have on the community.
Kaushik Thakkar addressed the Planning Commission via teleconference and offered a suggestion to include Badminton amongst the sports offered by facility.
Summary of staff questions:
Does the Planning Commission believe the proposed use meet the determination criteria for Section 17.42.040?
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
148
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
Commissioner Pedro stated that his main concerns will be answered through the parking analysis as well as in regard to capacity and safety.
Commissioner Jagtiani added that once the analysis is done, that would be the right time to deliberate it.
Commissioner Stoveland responded that it fits the definition as presented under Section
17.42.040.
Commissioner Kenkre offered his support of the project.
Chair Haddad concurred.
Are the proposed hours of operation acceptable to the Commission?
Senior Planner Telfer indicated that the proposed hours of operations would be 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. on the weekdays. She provided that adult league organizations would run in the late evenings. She added that the weekend would be determined by what type of events will be held.
Commissioner Stoveland approved of the hours of operations and having the ability to have adult leagues in the evening.
Commissioner Jagtiani confirmed that there are no residential units in the close proximity and agreed on 11 p.m.
Commissioner Pedro stated that he is fine with the proposed hours of operation and is also in support of expanding the hours to have it open later.
Commissioner Kenkre agreed with the hours of operation.
Chair Haddad stated that the area is considered non-residential, and that noise and traffic will not be an issue. He supported the close time of 11 p.m.
Does the Planning Commission need further studies and/or additional analysis to be conducted to evaluate the impacts of the proposed use?
Commissioner Stoveland asked if there are requirements if the applicant were to consider holding events or serving food.
Community Development Director Mangalam stated that there is a requirement from the San Mateo Health Department if there is on-site cooking, but no requirements if food will be brought from outside.
Commissioner Jagtiani referenced that the parking analysis and occupancy study would suffice.
Commissioner Kenkre concurred.
Chair Haddad referenced Commissioner Pedro’s request for later hours and mentioned that the applicant can revisit the topic as an option at a later time.
Community Development Director Mangalam noted that the late hours will have to be referred to the Police Department.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
149
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY SESSION IS TO PROVIDE THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE PUBLIC AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND PROVIDE
INPUT ON A PROPOSED USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW A HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY USE WITHIN AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 989 E.
HILLSDALE BOULEVARD IN THE TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD – APN:
094-522-170
Planning Commissioners had the following discussion:
Commissioner Jagtiani inquired if the current campus has similar number and size of classrooms.
The applicant responded that they currently have three classrooms in their San Mateo campus. They furthered that the Foster City location would allow them one more skills lab and one more simulation lab.
Commissioner Jagtiani stated that parking is linked to the number of students attending the classes. He asked if the number of students changes over time.
The applicant confirmed that the number of students remains stable and that there are busier times depending on the class schedules and how they fall throughout the semester.
Commissioner Kenkre asked in advanced the types of experiments that w ould be conducted in the lab and if it would create a biohazard waste and was informed that it would not.
Commissioner Jagtiani asked if another parking analysis will be done.
Community Development Director Mangalam stated that they meet the Municipal Code parking regulations. She added that t he Assistant Planner McGill visited the San Mateo campus to gauge the parking scenario, where twenty to thirty parking spaces were occupied. She furthered that the Assistant Planner McGill had viewed the parking scenario on Google Maps over a couple of years and it remained consistent.
Commissioner Jagtiani asked if there will be any occupancy limit.
Community Development Director Mangalam stated that as part of the Building Permit review, both Building and Fire will look into the square footage being used for a specific use and if there is an occupancy limit.
Commissioner Jagtiani stated that it’s a great use of the property and will increase revenues for the City overall.
Community Development Director Mangalam informed that the applicant is keen on moving to a Public Hearing and if there are no further analysis , they will bring the item back to the Planning Commission in the next meeting.
Chair Haddad stated that he’s fine with the item being brought to the next meeting.
Commissioner Jagtiani agreed to expedite it.
10. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REPORT
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
150
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
1. Community Development Director Mangalam stated that the City embarked on updating two General Plan Elements, Open Space and Parks Element and Conservation Element.
She furthered that the next meeting will be a Joint Study Session with the Parks and Recreation Committee and that there are plans to have two additional study sessions, the first is to introduce the project and discuss the community engagement plan. She added that there is overlap from the Parks Master Plan that will help in our Parks and Open Space Element.
11. STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS
1. Commissioner Stoveland stated he had no requests.
2. Commissioner Jagtiani informed that the Holi Festival will be on March 2 2nd and hopes to see the community there.
3. Commissioner Kenkre stated that he is at tending the Planning Commissioner Academy and how it is an unbelievably beneficial experience.
4. Commissioner Pedro thanked staff for their time, preparing the reports, and handling all the questions. He stated that he is looking forward to Commissioner Kenkre’s takeaways from the Planning Commissioner Academy and that it’s a valuable experience.
5. Chair Haddad stated that he appreciates all the effort made by the City staff in preparing the reports.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourned at 9:12 p.m. to a Regular Meeting, March 20, 2025, Council Chambers, 620 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, California.
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
151
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 2025
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Foster City at a Regular Meeting thereof held on April 3, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES, COMMISSIONERS: Jagtiani, Kenkre, Pedro, Stoveland and Chair Haddad
NOES, COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN, COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS:
_____________________________
NICOLAS HADDAD, CHAIR
ATTEST:
____________________________
SOFIA MANGALAM, SECRETARY
Nicolas Haddad (Apr 7, 2025 20:30 PDT)
Nicolas Haddad
7.2 Attachment 2 - March 6, 2025, Regular Meeting and Study Session Minutes
152
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
Anti-Displacement Strategies
Staff researched cities in the Bay Area with anti-displacement strategies and reached out to 21 Elements to provide an overview of research covering the Bay Area. The following provides an overview of programs.
Table 1. Relocation Assistance Programs, San Mateo County Jurisdiction Relocation Assistance Provisions
Redwood City Three to four months of Fair Market Rent
Menlo Park Three months of rent and four for certain circumstances Mountain View The cash equivalent of three (3) months' rent, based on the median monthly rent for a similar-sized unit with the same number of bedrooms and bathrooms as determined by a survey taken at least once a year of apartment rents in Mountain View.
An additional eight thousand dollars ($8,000.00) per rental unit for special-circumstances households adjusted annually for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area. The adjustment shall be made at the beginning of the calendar year.
Palo Alto Specific amounts: $7,000 for a studio; $9,000 for a one-bedroom unit; $13,000 for a two-bedroom unit; $17,000 for units with three or more bedrooms
San Jose $6,925 for a studio; $8,400 for a one-bedroom; $10,353 for a three bedroom; $12,414 for three or more bedrooms. Additional assistance from $1,2770 to $4,966 and special assistance of between $1,200 and $2,000 may also apply under certain
circumstances
Half Moon Bay Three months rent equal to the tenant’s rent that was in effect when the landlord issued the notice to terminate the tenancy.
Source: Municipal codes, City websites
Attachment 3
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
153
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
Table 2: Cities with Anti-Displacement Policies and Programs Fair Housing
Enforcement
Daly City
County of San Mateo
Woodside
Redwood City
Portola Valley
San Carlos
Colma
South San Francisco
Campbell
Cupertino
Milpitas
Gilroy
Sunnyvale
Los Gatos
Landlord and Tenant
Mediation
East Palo Alto
San Mateo County
Woodside
Redwood City
Hillsborough
Half Moon Bay
Campbell
Cupertino
Milpitas
Gilroy
Sunnyvale
Los Gatos
Santa Clara City
Rental Assistance
Program
East Palo Alto
Daly City
San Mateo County
Brisbane
South San Francisco
Milpitas
Gilroy
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara City
Tenant Bill of Rights
East Palo Alto
San Mateo County
Menlo Park
Burlingame
Half Moon Bay
Sunnyvale
Los Gatos
Tenant Legal
Assistance
East Palo Alto
Daly City
San Mateo County
Woodside
San Mateo City
Campbell
Milpitas
Gilroy
Sunnyvale
Los Gatos
Tenant Relocation
Assistance
San Mateo City
San Carlos
Colma
Half Moon Bay
South San Francisco
Milpitas
Sunnyvale
Tenant Anti-
Harassment/
Retaliation
Woodside
Half Moon Bay
Los Gatos
Just Cause
East Palo Alto
Half Moon Bay
Cupertino
Sunnyvale
Anti-Displacement
Tenant Preference
San Mateo City
San Carlos
Foster City
Milpitas
Gilroy
Los Gatos
Rent Stabilization
East Palo Alto
Half Moon Bay
Los Gatos
Rental Registry
San Carlos
Half Moon Bay
Los Gatos
Morgan Hill
East Palo Alto
Tenant Commission
East Palo Alto
Source: 21 Elements
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
154
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
Summaries of strategies include:
1.Redwood City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy was adopted in 2022 ( see link). The City has the following local ordinances in place: Minimum Lease Term Ordinance that requires landlords to offer a 12-month lease for both initial leases and renewals. Tenants are not required to accept a 12-month lease once offered; it is the tenant’s choice whether they enter into a 12-month lease (see link). Relocation Assistance Ordinance (RAO) requires certain eligible households that were forced to relocate through no fault of their own to receive financial assistance to ease their transition. The RAO requires landlords to pay eligible tenants three to four months of Fair Market Rent (FMR) in some eviction circumstances (see link).
2.San Jose’s Anti-Displacement Strategy was approved in 2020 ( see link) and included measures like establishing neighborhood tenant preference for affordable housing, exploring a community opportunity to purchase Program/Ordinance, establishing new sources of funding for affordable housing and Anti-Displacement, etc.
3.Menlo Park: The ordinance for “Residential Leases for Rental Units” only applies to multi-family, boarding house, and lodging houses and includes a requirement for a minimum one (1) year lease term, but the landlord and tenant may agree to other rental terms. (see link). Menlo Park also has a Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance that requires any landlord that causes the permanent displacement of residential households to provide eligible residential households with relocation assistance of three months of rent and four for certain circumstances (see link).
4.Mountain View: The Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance requires landlords to provide relocation assistance if renovations, redevelopment, or similar activities have displaced eligible tenants. The program applies to rental properties with three or more units (see link).
5.East Palo Alto has an affordable housing plan that includes several anti- displacement provisions, including identifying and maintaining a list of at-risk units and substandard buildings throughout the City to ensure property owners comply with the State Preservation Notice Law; actively engaging with property owners to reach agreements to preserve at-risk units and properly maintain their properties implementing an effective and fair housing compliant Local Preference Policy.
6.Concord requires the Landlord to offer the tenant a 12-month lease. If the tenant rejects the 12-month lease, the landlord must offer the tenant a 6-month lease. If the tenant rejects the 6-month lease, the tenant and landlord can negotiate a
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
155
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
shorter-term lease. The landlord does not have to accept a lease term of less than six (6) months.
7.Palo Alto has a Rental Housing Stabilization Ordinance requiring relocation assistance of $7,000 for a studio and $17,000 for a three-bedroom unit. (see link).
8.Half Moon Bay has a Tenant Protection Ordinance ( see link) that includes just cause provisions, relocation requirements, notice provisions, dispute resolution procedures, and minimum lease terms of one year. The ordinance was implemented on May 7, 2024.
Rental Registries
Staff reviewed city websites and found that the following Bay Area cities have Rental Registry software in place or pending: Alameda, Berkeley, Burlingame, Concord, Half Moon Bay, East Palo Alto, El Cerrito, Mountain View, Monterey, Oakland, Palo Alto, San Francisco, San Jose, San Pablo, and Burlingame. It should be noted that all rental registries for these cities apply to both BMR and market rate units. Examples of how these cities use the software include:
•The City of Concord has had a Rental Registry program for four (4) years as part of its Residential Tenant Protection Program. In addition to rent, the registry collects data on property address, size of unit, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, parking spaces, and lease terms. The City’s annual Rental Registry report provides a rent analysis, tenant-initiated termination analysis, analysis of unit sizes, and registry registration analysis. The City also provides data by neighborhood to help identify areas of higher risk for displacement. Registration is required for all rental units, including single-family homes. Registration fees are $29 to $47 per unit. •The City of Half Moon Bay states the following on its Rental Registry website page:
“This annual registration process is crucial to efforts to better understand rental housing characteristics in Half Moon Bay, which will help inform future policy decisions regarding rental housing.” The program is required for all rental units, including ADUs, single-family homes, and those who rent rooms. The costs to landlords/owners is $75 per unit. The following information is required for the registration of a residential rental unit:
oThe name, mailing address, phone number, and email of the owner, landlord, and property manager as applicable;
oThe street address (and unit number where applicable) of each residential rental unit or portion thereof for rent or lease;
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
156
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
oThe assessor’s parcel number (APN) that each residential rental unit for rent or lease is located;
oThe number of bedrooms and bathrooms in each residential rental unit, including square footage, for rent or lease;
oThe occupancy status of each residential rental unit (e.g., vacant or occupied); oReason for vacancy (e.g., lease expiration, voluntary move-out or eviction); oThe number of individuals currently residing in the unit, if occupied; oWhere applicable, the number of rooms individually rented; oThe current amount of the monthly rent charged for each residential rental unit, identifying whether the monthly rent includes specified utilities (e.g., water, sewer, solid waste disposal, natural gas, electricity, etc.); oWhether or not the unit’s monthly rent is subsidized (e.g., such as through a housing voucher or another subsidy).
•The City of Palo Alto recently adopted the Residential Registry Program effective from July 1, 2024. Registration is required for all rental properties with three or more units. As per their website, The Rental Registry Program will collect the following information:
oResidential rental property contact information, such as property owner and property manager contact information;
oResidential rental property characteristics, such as property address, property type, year purchased, number of rental units at the property, and year built; oResidential rental unit characteristics, such as rental unit address, size (indoor/outdoor), number of bedrooms and bathrooms, year of any remodel, and owner or property manager occupancy;
oTenancy information, such as rental unit tenancy status as occupied or vacant, date of vacancy, reason for vacancy, date of tenancy, initial lease length, date of 1-year lease renewal, and date of last lease renewal; oRent information, such as initial security deposit amount, base rent amount, current rent amount, presence of rental assistance/subsidy/deed restriction/incentive, and rental unit amenities/services; oAffidavit information, such as attestation of accuracy, submittal date, name/contact information for registrant;
oOptional information, such as open-ended opportunity to provide feedback. oEvents, such as when there is any increase in rent, when a notice to quit is sent to a renter, when an unlawful detainer complaint is filed, and when there is an eviction.
See City of Palo Alto, Rental Registry FAQs.
The City of Palo Alto adopted a phased implementation, which initially required registration for multi-family rental units (properties with 3 or more rental units).
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
157
Anti-Displacement Strategies and Rental Registries
Research from Other Jurisdictions
The staff has been directed to evaluate if/when to require registering and potentially charging the RRP participation fees for all remaining rental units (including rented single-family residences, J/ADUs, and duplexes). There is no fee for owners/landlords to register units in the first year. •The City of East Palo Alto is in the process of implementing a rental registry that will apply to market rate and BMR units. The rental registry is anticipated to go into effect later in 2025.
•The City of Alameda has a Rental Registry program that also allows tenants and landlords to file petitions. The City collects the following data:
oType of property – ADU, Condo, mixed-use built before 1995, mixed use built after 1995, multi-family built before 1995, multi-family built after 1995, single- family residence, single-family residence + ADU, townhouse oLandlord/property manager contact information – mailing address, phone, email
oAddress of unit
oYear built
oAssessor’s parcel number
oNumber of bedrooms
oOccupant type – tenant, rent-subsidized tenant, vacant, manager, owner, non-residential commercial, short-term rental, work/live oReason for vacancy
oMonthly rent
oUtilities charged to tenant
oIncrease in rent
oCase type – tenant petitions, landlord petitions, annual program fee payments, annual registration status, capital improvement plans, no fault terminations, temporary relocation, buyout agreements, invalid rent increase The City of Alameda charges $148 for Fully Regulated Units: subject to all Ordinance 3250 provisions; $100 for Partially Regulated Units: subject to all Ordinance 3250 provisions except rent control; and $0 for Rental units occupied by rent subsidized tenants (e.g. Housing Choice Voucher Section 8),
7.2 Attachment 3 - Research from Other Jurisdictions
158
DATE: April 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Nate Cruz, Finance Director
Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT: AMENDING SECTION 3.04.080, “FORMAL BID PROCEDURES
FOR PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND
EQUIPMENT”; SECTION 3.04.110, “AUTHORIZED PURCHASING
ALTERNATIVES FOR SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT”;
SECTION 3.04.140, “PURCHASE OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES”; AND SECTION 3.04.170, “PUBLIC PROJECTS-
DEFINITION” OF CHAPTER 3.04, PURCHASING SYSTEM
WITHIN TITLE 3 REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE FOSTER
CITY MUNICIPAL CODE; AND APPROVING AN UPDATED
PURCHASING POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council update the City’s Purchasing Policy by:
1. Introducing the attached ordinance by title only and waive further reading, amending Section 3.04.080, “Formal bid procedures for purchases of supplies, services and equipment”; Section 3.04.110, “Authorized purchasing alternatives for supplies, services and equipment”; Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of professional services”; and Section 3.04.170, “Public Projects-Definition” within Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3 Revenue and Finance of the Foster City Municipal Code to make administrative revisions to the City’s purchasing system; and
8.1 8.1 Staff Report
159
2. Adopting the attached resolution approving an updated Purchasing Policy with an effective date of May 5, 2025 upon approval of the ordinance above.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purchasing processes of the City and EMID (hereinafter referred to as “City”) are governed by state law, Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, and the City’s Purchasing Policy.
The EMID Code adopts the City’s Purchasing System by reference in Chapter 3.04, thus they additionally apply to EMID through EMID Code Section 4.48.010. In order to increase efficiency in the purchasing process, staff recommend amendments to the Foster City Municipal Code and Foster City Purchasing Policy by making three distinct improvements:
1. Allow the City Manager to approve all issuances of an RFP for Professional Services and Supplies, Equipment, and Services instead of requiring that the City Council approve issuances of RFP’s that are anticipated to result in an agreement over $50,000. Award of any contract over $50,000 would remain subject to Council approval.
2. Extend the amount of time City staff can use the results of another public agency’s active competitive process as an alternative procurement method to three (3) years.
3. Clarify that the current practice of using cooperative purchasing agreements is permitted as an alternative procurement method for supplies, equipment, and services.
BACKGROUND
Purchasing regulations divide purchases into the following three types of purchases:
1. Public Projects: these purchases are for construction and construction related services. There are no changes proposed to the award process for this type of contract.
2. Professional Services: these purchases include services such as engineering, design, project management, and other complex professional design/consulting services.
3. Supplies, Equipment, and Services: these purchases include consumable supplies (such as paper, pens, and fuel), equipment (such as laptops, vehicles, and furniture), and routine or standard services (such as janitorial, pest control, or security service).
Each of the three types of contracts above has different approval and competitive bidding requirements, depending on the amount of the contract. The purchasing methods are set by the City Council through the adoption of the Purchasing Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 3.04). The dollar levels are set by the City Council through the adoption of the Purchasing Policy.
ANALYSIS
8.1 8.1 Staff Report
160
Proposed Professional Services and Supplies and Services Amendments Currently for Professional Services and Supplies and Services contracts over $50,000, the Purchasing Policy requires that the City Council approve both the issuance of RFPs and as well as award of contracts. This typically is done at two separate Council meetings. The recommended changes would streamline the process by allowing the City Manager to approve the issuance of an RFP for any dollar amount while City Council would retain full review of the selected proposal and contract award authority, as shown in Table 1 below. This would help reduce the 4–6 week timeframe it takes for Council action to approve the issuance of an RFP which includes agendizing the item (typically a routine consent calendar item) and staff report preparation.
Table: Summary of Current Approval Requirements
≤$50,000 >$50,000Type of
Contract Current Proposed Current Proposed
Professional
Services
City Manager
approves both
issuance of RFP
and award of
contract
No change Council approves
both issuance of
an RFP and award
of contract
City Manager
approves issuance
of RFP and
Council approves
award of contract.
Supplies,
Equipment, and
Services
City Manager
approves award
No change Council approves
both issuance of
an RFP and award
of contract
City Manager
approves RFP
then Council
approves award.
Proposed Amendments to Use of Other Agency Processes
The current language in Chapter 3.04 of the Municipal Code provides alternatives to the informal and formal competitive bidding processes for the award of contracts for supplies, equipment, and services, which includes the ability to use the results of another jurisdiction’s competitive process to award a contract. This practice is often referred to as “piggybacking”. Language in the current Municipal Code limits the time within which the City may award a contract after the other jurisdiction’s competitive process to 6 months for other public agencies or 12 months for the State of California.
Staff recommends increasing the timeframe to 36 months (three years) regardless of the agency/jurisdiction to align with the current Policy’s recommendation to award contracts for 36 months of term subsequent to a competitive process. This increases the City’s ability to leverage the work of other jurisdictions and efficiently purchase needed goods and services.
Proposed Amendments for Cooperative Purchasing Agreements Cooperative purchasing agreements, such as Sourcewell or the California Multiple Award Schedules, are competitively bid agreements covering a wide array of supplies, equipment, and services that were designed to be used by any jurisdiction. Staff has successfully used these cooperative purchasing agreements under the existing language allowing “piggybacking” described above. While cooperative purchasing
8.1 8.1 Staff Report
161
agreements are similar to “piggybacking” agreements in that they are created by other public agencies, staff recommends formalizing their inclusion in the Municipal Code and Purchasing Policy. A review of the purchasing policies of three nearby jurisdictions confirmed it is typical to include specific language allowing cooperative purchasing agreements. The formal inclusion of cooperative purchasing agreements does not make any change to the Council approval thresholds.
Should the Council approve the attached ordinance and resolution, the effective date of these changes would be May 5, 2025.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Not Applicable
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact directly associated with this item.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Staff Empowerment and Operational Excellence
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Resolution
Attachment 3 – Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
Attachment 4 – Purchasing Policy Clean Version
Attachment 5 – Purchasing Policy Red-lined
8.1 8.1 Staff Report
162
ORDINANCE NO. ______________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AMENDING SECTION 3.04.080, “FORMAL BID PROCEDURES FOR PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT”; SECTION 3.04.110, “AUTHORIZED PURCHASING ALTERNATIVES FOR SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT”; SECTION 3.04.140, “PURCHASE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES”; AND SECTION 3.04.170 “PUBLIC PROJECTS- DEFINITIONS” OF CHAPTER 3.04, “PURCHASING SYSTEM,” WITHIN TITLE 3, OF
THE FOSTER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE ADMINISTRATIVE REVISIONS TO THE CITY’S PURCHASING SYSTEM
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City’s municipal code currently includes Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, of Title 3, Revenue and Finance; and,
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to update its purchasing system and policy to improve efficiency through encouraging the use of the cooperative purchasing agreements and the results of competitive bidding processes in other jurisdictions
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS :
Section 1. Amendment. Section 3.04.080, “Formal bid procedures for purchases of supplies, services and equipment,” Section 3.04.110, “Authorized purchasing alternatives for supplies, services and equipment, Section 3.04.140, “Purchase of professional services” and Section 3.04.170, “Public Projects-Definitions,” of Chapter
3.04 within Title 3 of the Foster City Municipal Code shall be amended by repealing those sections and replacing them in their entirety to read as follows:
“Chapter 3.04
PURCHASING SYSTEM
…
3.04.080 Formal bid procedures for purchases of supplies, services and equipment.
A. For purchase of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level C):
1. City manager authorizes the issuance of a bid request, or, in the alternative, the city manager authorizes the purchasing authority to negotiate directly with sole source vendor.
2. Purchasing authority publishes bid request to potential qualified vendors.
8.1 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
163
3 2
8 5
3 2
8 5
3. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city council.
4. City council approves contract for purchase of the supplies, services and equipment.
…
3.04.110 Authorized purchasing alternatives for supplies, services and equipment.
Requirements for bids may be dispensed with for:
A. Purchases, supplies, services and equipment are of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level A);
B. Commodities that can be obtained from only one vendor; C. Emergency purchases as defined in Section 3.04.100 are required; D. Purchase of insurance coverage;
E. Franchises that are awarded by the city council;
F. Purchases that use bids of other departments of the City/District of other public agencies not older than thirty-six months;
G. Purchases that use cooperative purchasing agreements; H. Purchases that qualify for alternative purchasing process under state law, such as energy procurement and efficiency projects that meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 4217.
…
3.04.140 Purchase of professional services.
A. Definition. Professional services is generally defined as related to:
architectural; landscape architectural; engineering (including but not limited to civil, electrical, computer hardware/software, or audiovisual system); environmental; land surveying; professional management services (including but not limited to human resources, training, group facilitation, or legislative analysis); construction project management services; or legal, expert or auditing services.
B. The following procedures shall be followed in obtaining requests for qualifications or proposals for professional services contracts:
1. For professional services contracts of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level D):
8.1 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
164
3 2
8 5
3 2
8 5
a. Purchasing authority issues request for qualifications or proposals, or, in the alternative, the city manager authorizes negotiation directly with sole source provider.
b. Purchasing authority publishes request for qualifications or proposals to potential service providers.
c. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city manager.
d. City manager approves contract if funds are available in department budget. e. If funds are not available in department budget, proposal goes to the city council to approve funding and award contract for professional services.
2. For professional services contracts of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level E):
a. The city manager authorizes issuing of request for qualifications or proposals (including specifications and/or scope of work), or, in the alternative, authorizes the purchasing authority to negotiate directly with a sole source provider. b. Purchasing authority publishes request for qualifications or proposals to potential service providers.
c. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city council.
d. City council approves contract for professional services. …
3.04.170 Public projects—Definitions.
A. General. Contracts for public projects as defined in the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act shall be in writing and awarded by the city council or its designee to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, except as otherwise provided herein.
B. “Public project” is generally defined as:
1. Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility;
2. Painting or repainting of any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility;
3. In the case of a publicly owned utility system, “public project” shall include only the construction, erection, improvement, or repair of dams, reservoirs, power
8.1 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
165
3 2
8 5
3 2
8 5
plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand volts and higher.
C. “Public project” does not include maintenance work. For purposes of this section, “maintenance work” is generally defined as:
1. Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any city-owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes;
2. Minor repainting;
3. Resurfacing of streets and highways at less than one inch;
4. Landscape maintenance, including mowing, watering, trimming, pruning, planting, replacement of plants, and servicing of irrigation and sprinkler systems;
5. Work performed to keep, operate, and maintain publicly owned water, power, or waste disposal systems, including, but not limited to, dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand volts and higher.
D. “Facility” is generally defined as any plant, building, structure, ground facility, utility system, real property, streets and highways, or other public work improvement.”
All other sections of Chapter 3.04 not specifically amended herein shall remain unchanged.
Section 2. CEQA. This ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this would be a purely administrative change and not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Foster City hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion be declared invalid or unconstitutional or ineffective.
Section 4. Pursuant to Section 36937 of the Government Code of the State of California, this Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.
8.1 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
166
3 2
8 5
3 2
8 5
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption as provided by Government Code section 36937.
Section 6. Publication; Certification. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in accordance with State law.
This Ordinance was introduced and read on the 21st day of April, 2025, and passed and adopted on the ________ day of _______________, ______, by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________________
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
8.1 Attachment 1 - Ordinance
167
RESOLUTION NO.____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S PURCHASING POLICY RELATED TO
CONTRACT AWARDS AND ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the City last updated its Purchasing Policy December 2, 2024; and WHEREAS, Foster City Municipal Code, Title 3 “Revenue and Finance”, Chapter
3.04 “Purchasing System”, sets forth the methods by which the City procures and contracts for supplies and services and public projects; and
WHEREAS, the City has developed a Purchasing Policy that was first adopted via City Resolution No. 2007-37 that sets forth detailed purchasing policies for the procurement of supplies and services as well as public projects; and
WHEREAS, the Purchasing Policy sets dollar limits and/or approving authority of the City Manager for procurement of supplies and services and public projects that are in compliance with the adopted budget; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to streamline the procurement process, while still maintaining a high level of fiscal accountability; and
WHEREAS, Purchasing Policy Section 3A needs to be updated to ensure the smooth transition of authority by designating all Department Heads as Purchasing Agents under the Purchasing Policy; and
WHEREAS, Purchasing Policy Section 3B needs to be updated to clarify that the use of cooperative purchasing agreements is permitted to reflect amendments to Municipal Code Section 3.04 pursuant to City Council approval of those changes anticipated for May 5, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Purchasing Policy Section 5 needs to be updated to authorize the City Manager to approve the issuance of Requests for Proposals for Professional Services or Supplies, Equipment, and Services anticipated to cost greater than or equal to $50,000; and
WHEREAS, additional administrative changes have been incorporated in Sections 8, 12, and 14, in order to clarify and define existing language; and WHEREAS, the EMID Code adopts the City’s Purchasing System by reference in Chapter 3.04, thus they additionally apply to EMID through EMID Code Section 4.48.010.
8.1 Attachment 2 - Resolution
168
3 2
8 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY that the City Council does hereby approve the attached Amendment to the Purchasing Policy and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Policy and distribute it to staff for immediate implementation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 21st day of April, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK
8.1 Attachment 2 - Resolution
169
Chapter 3.04
PURCHASING SYSTEM*
Sections:
3.04.010 Adoption.
3.04.030 Purchasing policies, procedures, limits and functions.
3.04.040 Estimates of requirements.
3.04.050 Available funds required.
3.04.060 Open market purchases of supplies, services and equipment.
3.04.070 Informal bid procedures—Purchase of supplies, services and equipment.
3.04.080 Formal bid procedures for purchases of supplies, services and equipment.
3.04.090 Minimum number of bids, waiver of irregularities, rejection of bids, failure to receive bids for purchase of supplies, services and equipment by formal or informal bid procedure.
3.04.095 Procurement of recovered organic waste product and recycled-content paper.
3.04.100 Emergencies—Purchase of supplies, services or equipment.
3.04.110 Authorized purchasing alternatives for supplies, services and equipment.
3.04.120 Inspection and testing of supplies, services and equipment.
3.04.130 Surplus supplies and equipment.
3.04.140 Purchase of professional services.
3.04.150 Architectural design service—Disclosure statement.
3.04.160 Emergencies—Purchase of professional services.
3.04.170 Public projects—Definitions.
3.04.180 Force account—Public projects.
3.04.190 Informal bid procedures—Public projects.
3.04.200 Formal bid procedures—Public projects—Notice inviting bids.
3.04.210 Bidder’s security—Public projects.
3.04.220 Bid opening procedure—Public projects.
3.04.230 Tie bids—Public projects.
3.04.240 Waiver of irregularity, rejection of bids—Failure to receive bids—Options on public projects.
3.04.250 Performance bonds—Public projects.
3.04.260 Lowest responsible bidder determination—Public projects.
3.04.270 Change orders to public projects.
3.04.280 Emergencies—Public projects.
3.04.290 Affirmative action—Penalty for noncompliance. * Prior ordinance history: Ords. 86, 202, 413, 466, 488 and 519.
3.04.010 Adoption.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
170
In order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, services, equipment and public projects for the city, at the lowest cost commensurate with required quality, to exercise positive financial control over purchases that meet legal requirements and generally accepted accounting principles, and to define authority for the purchasing function, a purchasing system is adopted. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.030 Purchasing policies, procedures, limits and functions.
The city manager shall recommend and the city council shall approve policies and procedures necessary to implement a purchasing system compliant with Section 3.04.010, which will include the necessary assignment of duties in order to carry out those policies and procedures.
Those policies and procedures shall include dollar limits associated with the purchase of goods, supplies and services, professional services agreements, and public projects as defined in this chapter. Such dollar limits shall be reviewed and modified based upon city council resolution on a periodic basis as determined by the city manager.
Those policies and procedures shall include designating city staff, known as the “purchasing authority,” who are authorized and obligated pursuant to the authority granted by this chapter to:
A. Purchase or contract for supplies, services, equipment and public projects required by operating departments;
B. Negotiate and recommend execution of contracts for the purchase of supplies, services, equipment and public projects;
C. Comply with the requirements of the California Public Contracts Code, including the provisions of the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act for competitive bidding of public projects except where alternative procurement processes are allowed by state law (e.g., California Government Code Section 4217); D. Prescribe and maintain forms required by this chapter; E. Supervise the inspection of all supplies and equipment purchased to ensure conformance with contract documents;
F. Maintain a bidders’ list of the vendors that are capable of supplying the various goods, supplies and services required by the city;
G. Encourage competitive bidding as set forth in this chapter; H. Act to procure for the city the necessary quality in supplies, services, equipment and public projects at the lowest cost to the city;
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
171
I. Execute the provisions contained in this chapter and provide administrative interpretation and advise on the provisions contained herein. (Ord. 586 § 1 (part), 2014:
Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.040 Estimates of requirements.
All departments shall be responsible for estimating their requirements for supplies, services, equipment, and public projects in such manner, at such time and for such periods as necessary for the appropriation of funds and to carry out city business. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.050 Available funds required.
Except in cases of emergency or in cases where specific authority has been first obtained from the city manager, the purchasing authority shall not purchase supplies, services, equipment or public projects unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the departmental fund budget against which the purchase is to be charged. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.060 Open market purchases of supplies, services and equipment.
Purchases of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level A) may be made by the purchasing authority in the open market. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.070 Informal bid procedures—Purchase of supplies, services and equipment.
A. For purchase of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level B):
1. Purchasing authority issues bid request, or, in the alternative, the city manager authorizes negotiation directly with sole source vendor.
2. Purchasing authority publishes bid request to potential qualified vendors.
3. Purchasing authority analyzes bid responses received and makes recommendation to city manager.
4. City manager approves contract if funds are available in department budget.
5. If funds are not available in a department’s budget, a proposal goes to the city council to approve funding and award the contract to purchase supplies, services and equipment. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.080 Formal bid procedures for purchases of supplies, services and equipment.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
172
A. For purchase of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level C):
1. City council manager authorizes the issuance of a bid request, or, in the alternative, the city council manager authorizes the purchasing authority to negotiate directly with sole source vendor.
2. Purchasing authority publishes bid request to potential qualified vendors.
3. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city council.
4. City council approves contract for purchase of the supplies, services and equipment. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.090 Minimum number of bids, waiver of irregularities, rejection of bids, failure to receive bids for purchase of supplies, services and equipment by formal or informal bid procedure.
A. Minimum Number of Bids. Purchase of supplies, services and equipment shall, wherever possible, be based on at least three bids and shall, unless otherwise determined by the awarding authority for good cause, be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder consistent with the quality of supplies, services, equipment required.
B. Notice Inviting Bids. The purchasing authority shall solicit bids by written requests to prospective vendors, including written electronic communications such as e-mail, or by telephone.
C. Written Bids and Phone Bids. The purchasing authority shall keep records of all bids for a period of one year after submission of bids or the placing of orders.
D. Waiver of Irregularities. Irregularities in any bid received may be waived and the contract awarded.
E. Rejection of Bids. All bids may be rejected.
F. Failure to Receive Bids. If no bids are received, the services may be performed by city employees by force account or by negotiated contract entered into without need for further bidding. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.095 Procurement of recovered organic waste product and recycled-content paper.
A. All vendors providing paper products and printing and writing paper to the city of Foster City shall:
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
173
1. If fitness and quality are equal, provide recycled-content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper that consists of at least thirty percent, by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber instead of nonrecycled products whenever recycled paper products and printing and writing paper are available at the same or lesser total cost than nonrecycled items.
2. Provide paper products and printing and writing paper that meet Federal Trade Commission recyclability standard as defined in 16 CFR Section 260.12.
3. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, the minimum percentage of postconsumer material in the paper products and printing and writing paper offered or sold. This certification requirement may be waived if the percentage of postconsumer material in the paper products, printing and writing paper, or both can be verified by a product label, catalog, invoice, or a manufacturer or vendor internet website.
4. Certify in writing, on invoices or receipts provided, which may be electronic, that the paper products and printing and writing paper offered or sold is eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in 16 CFR Section 260.12 (2013).
5. Provide records to Foster City’s recovered organic waste product procurement recordkeeping designee, in accordance with this section and the city’s procurement policy, of all paper products and printing and writing paper purchases within thirty days of the purchase (both recycled content and nonrecycled content, if any is purchased) made by any division or department or employee of the city of Foster City. Records shall include a copy (electronic or paper) of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as required in subsections (A)(3) and (4) of this section for recycled-content purchases, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content (including products that contain none), and if nonrecycled-content paper products or printing and writing papers are provided, include a description of why recycled-content paper products or printing and writing papers were not provided.
B. All vendors providing compost to the city of Foster City shall provide compost that meets the definition in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as of the effective date of this section, that “compost” means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic solid wastes that are source separated from the municipal solid waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility. Compost eligible for meeting the city’s annual recovered organic waste product procurement target must be produced at a compostable material handling operation or facility permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division 7 or produced at a large volume in-vessel digestion facility that composts on site as defined and permitted under 14 CCR Chapter 3.2 of Division 7. Compost shall meet the state’s composting operations regulatory requirements.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
174
C. All vendors providing mulch to the city of Foster City shall provide SB 1383 eligible mulch pursuant to 14 CCR Chapter 12 of Division 7 that meet the conditions for the duration of the applicable procurement compliance year, as specified by 14 CCR Section 18993.1(f)(4). (Ord. 643 § 3, 2021)
3.04.100 Emergencies—Purchase of supplies, services or equipment.
A. General. Emergency purchases should be made under the provisions of Chapter 2.40 of the municipal code pertaining to emergency organization and functions.
B. Purchases of Supplies, Services and Equipment. When an emergency exists which, in the judgment of the department head, requires immediate action to insure the public health, safety and welfare, and the city manager and the city treasurer are not available, the department head may authorize the purchase of the necessary supplies, services and equipment to respond to the emergency. The city manager and city treasurer shall have similar authority in the event of the necessity for immediate emergency action. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.110 Authorized purchasing alternatives for supplies, services and equipment.
Requirements for bids may be dispensed with for:
A. Purchases, supplies, services and equipment are of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level A);
B. Commodities that can be obtained from only one vendor; C. Emergency purchases as defined in Section 3.04.100 are required; D. Purchase of insurance coverage;
E. Franchises that are awarded by the city council;
F. Purchases that use bids of other departments of the City/District of other public agencies the state of California not older than twelvethirty-six months; G. Purchases that use bids from other public agencies that are not older than six months;
G. Purchases that use cooperative purchasing agreements; H. Purchases that qualify for alternative purchasing process under state law, such as energy procurement and efficiency projects that meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 4217. (Ord. 586 § 1 (part), 2014: Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.120 Inspection and testing of supplies, services and equipment.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
175
The purchasing authority or designated representative shall inspect supplies and equipment delivered to determine their conformance with the contract documents or specifications set forth in the order. The purchasing authority shall have the authority to require chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with specifications, including OSHA and/or California industrial safety standards. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.130 Surplus supplies and equipment.
All departments shall submit to the city manager or designated representative, at such time and in such forms as prescribed, reports showing all supplies and equipment which are no longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out. The purchasing authority shall have authority to sell or exchange for or trade in on new supplies and equipment which cannot be used by any agency or which have become unsuitable for city use. Trade-in values shall not be used in offsetting the gross cost of purchased supplies, services or equipment in determining the appropriate bidding procedures required by this chapter. All sales, exchanges or trade transactions shall be reported to the city manager. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.140 Purchase of professional services.
A. Definition. Professional services is generally defined as related to: architectural; landscape architectural; engineering (including but not limited to civil, electrical, computer hardware/software, or audiovisual system); environmental; land surveying; professional management services (including but not limited to human resources, training, group facilitation, or legislative analysis); construction project management services; or legal, expert or auditing services.
B. The following procedures shall be followed in obtaining requests for qualifications or proposals for professional services contracts:
1. For professional services contracts of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level D):
a. Purchasing authority issues request for qualifications or proposals, or, in the alternative, the city manager authorizes negotiation directly with sole source provider. b. Purchasing authority publishes request for qualifications or proposals to potential service providers.
c. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city manager.
d. City manager approves contract if funds are available in department budget.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
176
e. If funds are not available in department budget, proposal goes to the city council to approve funding and award contract for professional services.
2. For professional services contracts of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level E):
a. The city council manager authorizes issuing of request for qualifications or proposals (including specifications and/or scope of work), or, in the alternative, authorizes the purchasing authority to negotiate directly with a sole source provider. b. Purchasing authority publishes request for qualifications or proposals to potential service providers.
c. Purchasing authority analyzes proposals received and makes recommendation to city council.
d. City council approves contract for professional services. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.150 Architectural design service—Disclosure statement.
In the procurement of architectural design services requiring an expenditure in excess of ten thousand dollars, the request for qualifications or proposals shall include a specific disclosure, in bold type, of any contract provision that would require the contracting architect to indemnify and hold harmless the city against any and all liability, whether or not caused by the activity of the contracting architect. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.160 Emergencies—Purchase of professional services.
A. General. Emergency purchases shall be conducted under the provisions of Chapter 2.40 of the municipal code pertaining to emergency organization and functions.
B. Purchases of Professional Services. When an emergency exists which, in the judgment of the department head, requires immediate action to insure the public health, safety and welfare, and the city manager and the city treasurer are not available, the department head may authorize the purchase of the necessary professional services to respond to the emergency. The city manager and city treasurer shall have similar authority in the event of the necessity for immediate emergency action. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.170 Public projects—Definitions.
A. General. Contracts for public projects as defined in the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act shall be in writing and awarded by the city council or its designee to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, except as otherwise provided herein.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
177
B. “Public project” is generally defined as:
1. Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility;
2. Painting or repainting of any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility;
3. In the case of a publicly owned utility system, “public project” shall include only the construction, erection, improvement, or repair of dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand volts and higher.
C. “Public project” does not include maintenance work. For purposes of this section, “maintenance work” is generally defined as:
1. Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any city- owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes;
2. Minor repainting;
3. Resurfacing of streets and highways at less than one inch;
4. Landscape maintenance, including mowing, watering, trimming, pruning, planting, replacement of plants, and servicing of irrigation and sprinkler systems;
5. Work performed to keep, operate, and maintain publicly owned water, power, or waste disposal systems, including, but not limited to, dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand volts and higher.
D. “Facility” is generally defined as any plant, building, structure, ground facility, utility system, real property, streets and highways, or other public work improvement. (Ord. 586 § 1 (part), 2014: Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.180 Force account—Public projects.
Public projects of an estimated value less than or equal to the amount specified in the purchasing policy (Level 1) may be performed by city employees by force account, by negotiated contract or by purchase order. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.190 Informal bid procedures—Public projects.
A. For public projects of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level 2):
1. A list of contractors shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the provisions of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code and criteria promulgated from time to time by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission.
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
178
2. A notice inviting informal bids shall be mailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with Public Contracts Code Section 22034, and to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified when soliciting bids; provided however:
a. If there is no list of qualified contractors maintained by the city for the particular category of work to be performed, the notice inviting bids shall be sent only to the construction trade journals specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission.
b. If the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting informal bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.200 Formal bid procedures—Public projects—Notice inviting bids.
A. For public projects of an estimated value as specified in the purchasing policy (Level 3).
1. The city council shall authorize issuance of notices inviting formal bids which shall include a general description of the public project to be constructed, shall state where bid forms and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for opening bids.
2. Notices inviting bids published and posted at least fourteen calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation as provided for in California Public Contracts Code Section 22037.
3. The city council may require a bid to include prices for items that may be added to, or deducted from, the scope of work in the contract for which the bid is being submitted.
Whenever additive or deductive items are included in a bid, the bid solicitation shall specify which one of the following methods will be used to determine the lowest bid. In the absence of a specification, only the method provided by subsection (A)(3)(a) of this section will be used.
a. The lowest bid shall be the lowest bid price on the base contract without consideration of the prices on the additive or deductive items. b. The lowest bid shall be the lowest total of the bid prices on the base contract and those additive or deductive items that were specifically identified in the bid solicitation as being used for the purpose of determining the lowest bid price. c. The lowest bid shall be the lowest total of the bid prices on the base contract and those additive or deductive items that when taken in order from a specifically identified
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
179
list of those items in the solicitation, and added to, or subtracted from, the base contract, are less than, or equal to, a funding amount publicly disclosed by the city before the first bid is opened.
d. The lowest bid shall be determined in a manner that prevents any information that would identify any of the bidders or proposed subcontractors or suppliers from being revealed to the public entity before the ranking of all bidders from lowest to highest has been determined.
4. A responsible bidder who submitted the lowest bid as determined by this section shall be awarded the contract, if it is awarded. This section does not preclude the city from adding to or deducting from the contract any of the additive or deductive items after the lowest responsible bidder has been determined.
5. Nothing in this section shall preclude the prequalification of general contractors or subcontractors.
6. The city council shall also solicit sealed bids from all responsible prospective bidders whose names are on the bidders’ list or who have made written request that their names be added thereto.
7. The city council shall also advertise bids by a notice posted at a publicly accessible location at city offices. Such posting places can include, but shall not be limited to, electronically accessible locations such as the city’s web site or by other means that reasonably allow prospective bidders to be notified of pending purchases. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.210 Bidder’s security—Public projects.
When deemed necessary, bidder’s security may be prescribed in the formal or informal notices inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security; provided, however, that a successful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon his refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract. The city council may, at its option, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible and responsive bidder, and if the city council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder’s security shall be applied by the city to the contract price differential between the lowest bid and the second lowest bid, subtracting actual administrative costs, and any surplus, if any, shall be returned to the defaulted bidder. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.220 Bid opening procedure—Public projects.
Sealed bids shall be submitted to the city and shall be identified as “bids” on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the bid notices by the city clerk, purchasing authority, or their authorized representatives. A tabulation
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
180
of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.230 Tie bids—Public projects.
If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay for readvertising for bids, the city council may, in its discretion, accept the bid it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by and after negotiations with the tie bidders. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
3.04.240 Waiver of irregularity, rejection of bids—Failure to receive bids—Options on public projects.
A. At its discretion, the city council may waive any irregularity in any bid received and award the contract.
B. At its discretion, the city council may reject all bids presented. If the city council, prior to rejecting all bids, declares that the project can be more economically performed by city employees and furnishes a written notice to an apparent low bidder mailed at least two business days prior to the hearing at which the city intends to reject the bid, the city council may:
1. Abandon the project or readvertise for bids.
2. By a four-fifths vote declare by resolution that the project can be performed more economically by city employees, and order the project done by force account.
C. If no bids are received, the project may be performed by the city employees by force account or by negotiated contract entered into without need for further bidding. (Ord. 536 § 2 (part), 2007)
8.1 Attachment 3 - Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 Red-lined
181
1 3
2 8
6 PURCHASING POLICY
City of Foster City California
Updated: May 5, 2025
Prior Update: Jan 1, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 – Purpose and Scope...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Governing Principles..................................................................................................2 Section 3 – Authority ....................................................................................................................2 Section 4 – Contract Terms..........................................................................................................3 Section 5 – Dollar Limits...............................................................................................................3 Section 6 – Federally-Funded Contracts and Purchases .............................................................5 Section 7 – Affirmative Action Penalties.......................................................................................5 Section 8 – Surplus Equipment and Supplies...............................................................................5 Section 9 – Procurement of Recycled-Content Paper Products...................................................6 Section 10 – Procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Compost and/or Mulch........................................7 Section 11 – Employee Reimbursement of Benefits-Related Expenses......................................8 Section 12 – Procurement (Credit) Cards ....................................................................................8 Section 13 – Exclusion of Alcoholic Beverages............................................................................8 Section 14 – City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy..........................................................8 Section 15 – Disaster Procurement Policy ...................................................................................8
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
182
2 3
2 8
6 Section 1 – Purpose and Scope
In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.030, “The City Manager shall recommend and the City Council shall approve policies and procedures necessary in implementing a purchasing system which will include the necessary assignment of duties in order to carry out those policies and procedures.” Accordingly, the City Manager has hereby created this set of policies that all departments shall use in letting public construction contracts, executing professional services agreements, and purchasing supplies, services and equipment.
Section 2 – Governing Principles
In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.010, purchasing policies are created so that supplies, services and equipment are purchased or contracted for the City at the lowest cost commensurate with quality, and that apply positive financial controls that meet legal requirements and generally accepted accounting principles.
Section 3 –Authority
A.Purchasing Authority / Duties and Responsibilities. In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.030, Department Heads or their designees are hereby designated by the City Manager as Purchasing Authorities for the City, who are authorized and responsible for legally obligating the City in the purchase of supplies, services and equipment pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and this Purchasing Policy. A listing of such designated employees shall be maintained by the City Manager’s office or his/her designee, and shall be updated from time to time as business needs warrant. All such parties who are delegated authority under this Section are bound by the policies herein established. Failure to follow these policies is grounds for disciplinary action as provided in the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations.
B.The duties of the Purchasing Authority are as follows:
1.Purchasing or contracting for supplies, services, equipment and public projects required by operating departments;
2.Negotiating and recommending execution of contracts for the purchase of supplies, services, equipment and public projects;
3.Acting to procure for the city the necessary quality in supplies, services, equipment and public projects at the lowest cost to the city;
4.Encouraging competitive bidding as set forth in Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and endeavoring to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases;
5.Supervising the inspection of all supplies and equipment purchased to insure conformance with contract documents;
6.Maintaining a bidders' list of the vendors capable of supplying the various goods and services required by the City;
7.Maintaining adequate records of bids received and awarded for each purchase where a bidding process was used, or records of key decision made in implementing alternative purchasing methods used in accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.110, Authorized Purchasing Alternatives.
8.Encouraging procurement efficiency through the use of competitive processes from other jurisdictions or cooperative purchasing agreements (such as
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
183
3 3
2 8
6 Sourcewell, California Multiple Award Schedules, Federal Multiple Award Schedules, or other similar agreements), under City Municipal Code Section
3.04.110;
C.Centralized Duties. The City Manager, at his/her discretion, may centralize or decentralize any or all of the aforementioned duties. However, in order to maintain adequate internal accounting controls over the purchasing function, the City Manager shall designate the Finance Director to oversee the following centralized duties:
1.Prescribing and maintaining such forms as necessary to the operation of Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 and other rules and regulations, including purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or other transactional forms;
2.Executing the provisions contained in Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 and providing administrative interpretation and advising on the provisions contained in chapter 3.04.
D.Contracting Authority. Department Heads are hereby authorized to execute various agreements in the normal course of business that may legally bind the City with a vendor or outside agency, except for those agreements which require approval by the City Manager or City Council per ordinance or Council resolution.
E.Delegation of Contracting Authority. Department Heads, upon consultation with the City Manager, may delegate authority to their managers or supervisors to execute certain types of agreements such as recurring agreements or agreements where the amounts are considered de minimus (e.g., contracts with instructors for recreation classes). A delegate must be a full-time, permanent employee of the City of Foster City.
Section 4 – Contract Terms
If entering into a contract for perpetual, on-going services (e.g. regular maintenance work, regular janitorial services, etc.), the Purchasing Authority shall endeavor to contract for initial terms of at least three (3) years. Reasonable extensions to contract terms may be exercised if included within the original agreement along with process and timing for exercising those extensions.
Section 5 – Dollar Limits
The following dollar limits and approval authorities are established for procuring public contracts; supplies, services and equipment; and professional services. Subsequent changes to the dollar limits and/or approving authority are subject to City Council approval by resolution.
The following tables indicate the proper procurement method for contracts, purchases, and procurement of services under the requirements of the California Public Contract Code and Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System.
When contracting for an item or one-time/temporary service, the value of the contract for purposes of identifying the proper procurement method shall be the total compensation paid to the vendor/contractor/service provider, excluding contingency.
When contracting for perpetual, on-going services (e.g. regular maintenance work, regular janitorial services, etc.), the value of an on-going service contract – regardless of its term – shall
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
184
4 3
2 8
6 be the estimated cost of procuring the service for three (3) years. For example, a maintenance service contract which will compensate the contractor in an amount not-to-exceed $20,000 annually shall be considered a $60,000 contract for the purpose of establishing the proper procurement method based on dollar limits.
Federally-funded contracts and purchases must adhere to the federal guidelines, as outlined in Section 6 of this Policy.
A.Public Contract Code (no federal funds used)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level 1 – Force account (City employees) or
No bid requirements (Section 3.04.180)
City Manager
or Designee
<$75,000 or up to the Informal
Bid Limit Pursuant to Public
Contract Code Section 22032
Level 2 – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.190) (Note: If all bids received are in
excess of the Informal Bid limit set forth in
Public Contract Code section 22032, the
governing body of the public agency may, by
adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote,
award the contract, up to $235,000 or the limit
set forth in Public Contract Code section
22034(d), if it determines the cost estimate of
the public agency was reasonable.)
City Council > $75,000 and < $220,000
or Informal Bid Limit Pursuant
to Public Contract Code
Section 22032 except where
alternative procurement
processes are allowed by state
law (e.g., CA Government
Code Section 4217)
Level 3 – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.200, et seq), Council approval required
City Council > $220,000 or Formal Bid Limit
Pursuant to Public Contract
Code Section 22032 except
where alternative procurement
processes are allowed by
state law (e.g., CA
Government Code Section
4217)
B.Purchases of Supplies, Equipment, and Services (excluding Professional Services) (no federal funds used)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level A – No bid requirements
(open market) (Section 3.04.060)
City Manager or Designee < $10,000
Level B – Informal bid procedures
(Section 3.04.070)
City Manager > $10,000 and < $50,000
Level C – Formal bid procedures
(Section 3.04.080)
RFP: City Manager
Agreement/Purchase:
City Council
> 50,000*
C.Purchases of Professional Services
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
185
5 3
2 8
6 Level D – City Manager approval of
RFP and award of Contract (Sect.
3.04.140)
City Manager < $50,000
Level E – City Manager approval of
RFP and City Council award of
Contract (Sect 3.04.140)
RFP: City Manager
Agreement/Purchase:
City Council
> $50,000
Section 6 – Procurement Requirements for Federally-Funded Contracts and Purchases
Federally-funded contracts/purchases must adhere to criteria specified under Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Section 2 - CFR § 200.317-200.326, to comply with the Uniform Guidance (UG) procurement requirements. These requirements differ from those under the California Public Contract Code and the City’s procurement guidelines. Any contract or purchase using federal funds must comply with the methods specified in the following tables.
A.Federally-Funded Public Works Contracts
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level 1 – Force account (City employees) or
No bid requirements
(Section 3.04.180)
City Manager or
Designee
< $3,500
Level 2 – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.190) (Note: If all bids received exceed
the Informal Bid Limit, City Council may by
4/5 vote award contract to
lowest responsible bidder for up to an
additional 10% of that Limit
City Council > $3,500 and < $150,000 or
Informal Bid Limit Pursuant to 2
C.F.R. § 200.320
Level 3 – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.200, et seq), Council approval required
City Council > $150,000 or Informal Bid Limit
Pursuant to
2 C.F.R. § 200.320
B.Federally-Funded Purchases of Supplies, Equipment, and Services (excluding Professional Services)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level A – No bid requirements (open
market) (Section 3.04.060)
City Manager or
Designee
< $3,500
Level B – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.070)
City Manager > $3,500 and < $50,000
Level C – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.080), Council approval required
City Council > 50,000
Section 7 - Affirmative Action Penalties
Contractors in violation of Fair Employment Practices Act or other similar federal law; per person, per day, for each day the person was discriminated against: $100 per person, per day (updated
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
186
6 3
2 8
6 2007, Ordinance 563 § 2 (part))
Section 8 – Surplus Equipment and Supplies
On occasion, the City may desire to sell used or surplus equipment and/or supplies. Funds from the sale of said surplus assets will be recognized as revenues and deposited into reserves.
A.Sale of Surplus Assets. Departments must obtain prior written authorization from the City Manager (or his/her designee) to sell surplus assets in accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and this policy.
Surplus assets may be used as “trade-in” value with a vendor from whom replacement assets are purchased without the need for public sale of said assets. Otherwise, state and local law prohibit gifting of public funds to any individual or entity. Accordingly, the City shall use open methods in selling off surplus assets. Departments are authorized to use the following means of selling surplus assets in an open forum:
•Auctions – including City-run auctions, auction houses, online auctions (e.g., eBay)
•Sealed bids – sealed bids received and opened at a pre-specified time and place •Sales offers – under limited circumstances, the City may entertain offers from sole buyers (including City employees) to purchase surplus assets only after other open methods of disposing said assets are exhausted.
Departments must ensure that sale of any such assets are publicly noticed. Public notice of online auctions can be achieved through publicizing City-authorized online auctions on the City’s web site in an easily found location that links users to the online auction web site.
All funds received from sale of surplus assets must be recognized as revenue to the City (not as an offset to an expenditure).
B.Donating Surplus Assets. Subject to City Council approval, surplus equipment and/or supplies may be donated to local organizations, including but not limited to: school districts, public or private schools, service organizations, and non-profit organizations.
Unless expressly authorized by Council resolution, such assets shall have been determined to have little or no market value using open methods of public sale prior to being donated to local organizations. Organizations that provide services directly in or to Foster City residents or businesses shall have first priority.
Section 9 –Procurement of Recycled-Content Paper Products A.In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.095, if fitness and quality of recycled-content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper are equal to that of non-recycled items, Purchasing Authorities shall purchase recycled- content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, whenever available at the same or a lesser total cost than non-recycled items, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contracts Code, Sections 22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as amended.
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
187
7 3
2 8
6 B.Recycled-content paper products include, but are not limited to:
• Office Supplies: file folders, hanging file folders, white wove envelopes, manila envelopes, index cards, cartons, wrapping, packaging, corrugated boxes • Writing and Printing Papers: copy, xerographic, watermark, cotton fiber, offset, note pads, computer printout paper, writing tablets, other uncoated writing papers
• Printed Materials: calendars, brochures, reports, magazines, publications, posters, newsprint, book paper, forms
• Paper Janitorial Supplies: toilet paper, toweling, facial tissue, toilet seat covers C.All paper products and printing and writing paper must be eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
D.Purchasing Authorities will be responsible for obtaining records pertaining to procurement of recovered organic waste products and recycled-content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper, and shall input all data and digital copies of invoices, receipts, or other proofs of purchase that describe the procurement of printing and writing paper and paper products into the City’s SB 1383 Implementation Record to document its compliance with 14 CCR Section 18993.3. Records shall include a copy of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications for recycled-content purchases, vendor name, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content, and if non-recycled-content paper products and/or non-recycled- content printing and writing paper are procured, include a description of why recycled- content paper products and/or recycled- content printing and writing paper were not provided.
Section 10 – Procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Compost and/or Mulch A.Any department or individual procuring compost for or on behalf of the City shall procure compost that meets the definition in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as of the effective date of this policy, that “Compost” means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic Solid Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility.
Compost eligible for meeting the City’s Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target must be produced at a compostable material handling operation or facility permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division 7 or produced at a large volume in-vessel digestion facility that Composts on-site as defined and permitted under 14 CCR Chapter 3.2 of Division 7. Compost shall meet the State’s composting operations regulatory requirements.
B.Any department or individual procuring mulch for or on behalf of the City shall procure mulch pursuant to 14 CCR Chapter 12 of Division 7 that meets the conditions for the duration of the applicable procurement compliance year, as specified by 14 CCR Section 18993.1(f)(4).
•Produced at either a compostable material handling operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(12), that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7, other than a chipping and grinding operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10), OR a transfer/processing facility or transfer/processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that is
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
188
8 3
2 8
6 permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; OR, a solid waste landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27 CCR Division
2. •Meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration, and pathogen density standards for land application specified in 14 CCR Sections 17852(a)(24.5)(A)1 through 3.
Section 11 – Employee Reimbursement of Benefits-Related Expenses Employees are eligible for reimbursements of a variety of employment-related benefits, including but not limited to: vision, professional development expenses, uniform reimbursements, job- related footwear, and other benefits which may be part of negotiated benefits packages in Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with bargaining groups or compensation and benefits plans (C&B Plan) for unrepresented employees.
Employees shall submit requests for reimbursement of approved reimbursable expenses after those expenses are incurred by the employee. The request shall first be approved by the Department Head or his/her designee, then be approved by the Human Resources Department to ensure compliance with the provisions of the applicable MOU or C&B Plan.
Expenditures shall be accounted for as fringe benefits in the appropriate department budget.
Section 12 – Procurement (Credit) Cards
The City has created a Procurement (Credit) Card Program to assist departments in purchasing from vendors that do not accept purchase orders, or otherwise to improve the efficiency of processing small dollar item purchases. A Credit Card Program policy has been issued and is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 13 – Exclusion of Alcoholic Beverages
In general, City funds shall not be used to purchase alcoholic beverages and such expenditures are explicitly prohibited unless specifically approved in advance by a Department Head or the City Manager for rare special City events where serving alcoholic beverages would be appropriate, such as grand openings or citizen volunteer appreciation events.
Section 14 – City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy
In accordance with California Government Code § 53232.1-.4, the City Council has adopted a City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy. This Policy establishes guidelines regarding reimbursable expenses for City Councilmembers, and is required by law effective January 1, 2006.
The Policy is incorporated by reference herein. This Policy applies to the City Council as City Councilmembers and Estero Municipal Improvement District Directors.
Section 15 – Disaster Procurement Policy
The City Manager shall develop and implement a separate Disaster Procurement Policy to supplement the City’s normal purchasing practices to assure that, in both emergency and
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
189
9 3
2 8
6 exigent circumstances caused by a proclaimed disaster or emergency, the City is able to acquire the goods and services required to address an immediate threat to life safety, public health, or to eliminate or reduce an immediate threat of significant damage to improved public and private property through cost-effective measures while still maintaining an effective purchasing process that meets applicable California and federal purchasing laws for cost recovery and reimbursement.
8.1 Attachment 4 - Purchasing Policy Clean Version
190
1 PURCHASING POLICY
City of Foster City California
Updated: May 5, 2025
Prior Update: Jan 1, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 – Purpose and Scope...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Governing Principles..................................................................................................2 Section 3 – Authority ....................................................................................................................2 Section 4 – Contract Terms..........................................................................................................3 Section 5 – Dollar Limits...............................................................................................................3 Section 6 – Federally-Funded Contracts and Purchases .............................................................5 Section 7 – Affirmative Action Penalties.......................................................................................5 Section 8 – Surplus Equipment and Supplies...............................................................................5 Section 9 – Procurement of Recycled-Content Paper Products...................................................6 Section 10 – Procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Compost and/or Mulch........................................7 Section 11 – Employee Reimbursement of Benefits-Related Expenses......................................8 Section 12 – Procurement (Credit) Cards ....................................................................................8 Section 13 – Exclusion of Alcoholic Beverages............................................................................8 Section 14 – City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy..........................................................8 Section 15 – Disaster Procurement Policy ...................................................................................8
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
191
2 Section 1 – Purpose and Scope
In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.030, “The City Manager shall recommend and the City Council shall approve policies and procedures necessary in implementing a purchasing system which will include the necessary assignment of duties in order to carry out those policies and procedures.” Accordingly, the City Manager has hereby created this set of policies that all departments shall use in letting public construction contracts, executing professional services agreements, and purchasing supplies, services and equipment.
Section 2 – Governing Principles
In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.010, purchasing policies are created so that supplies, services and equipment are purchased or contracted for the City at the lowest cost commensurate with quality, and that apply positive financial controls that meet legal requirements and generally accepted accounting principles.
Section 3 –Authority
A.Purchasing Authority / Duties and Responsibilities. In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.030, Department Heads or their designees shall beare hereby designated by the City Manager as Purchasing Authorities for the City, who are authorized and responsible for legally obligating the City in the purchase of supplies, services and equipment pursuant to Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and this Purchasing Policy. A listing of such designated employees shall be maintained by the City Manager’s office or his/her designee, and shall be updated from time to time as business needs warrant. All such parties who are delegated authority under this Section are bound by the policies herein established. Failure to follow these policies is grounds for disciplinary action as provided in the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations.
B.The duties of the Purchasing Authority are as follows:
1.Purchasing or contracting for supplies, services, equipment and public projects required by operating departments;
2.Negotiating and recommending execution of contracts for the purchase of supplies, services, equipment and public projects;
3.Acting to procure for the city the necessary quality in supplies, services, equipment and public projects at the lowest cost to the city;
4.Encouraging competitive bidding as set forth in Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and endeavoring to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases;
5.Supervising the inspection of all supplies and equipment purchased to insure conformance with contract documents;
6.Maintaining a bidders' list of the vendors capable of supplying the various goods and services required by the City;
7.Maintaining adequate records of bids received and awarded for each purchase where a bidding process was used, or records of key decision made in implementing alternative purchasing methods used in accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.110, Authorized Purchasing Alternatives.
7.8.Encouraging procurement efficiency through the use of competitive processes from other jurisdictions or cooperative purchasing agreements (such as
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
192
3 Sourcewell, California Multiple Award Schedules, Federal Multiple Award Schedules, or other similar agreements), under City Municipal Code Section
3.04.110;
C.Centralized Duties. The City Manager, at his/her discretion, may centralize or decentralize any or all of the aforementioned duties. However, in order to maintain adequate internal accounting controls over the purchasing function, the City Manager shall designate the Finance Director to oversee the following centralized duties:
1.Prescribing and maintaining such forms as necessary to the operation of Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 and other rules and regulations, including purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or other transactional forms;
2.Executing the provisions contained in Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04 and providing administrative interpretation and advising on the provisions contained in chapter 3.04.
D.Contracting Authority. Department Heads are hereby authorized to execute various agreements in the normal course of business that may legally bind the City with a vendor or outside agency, except for those agreements which require approval by the City Manager or City Council per ordinance or Council resolution.
E.Delegation of Contracting Authority. Department Heads, upon consultation with the City Manager, may delegate authority to their managers or supervisors to execute certain types of agreements such as recurring agreements or agreements where the amounts are considered de minimus (e.g., contracts with instructors for recreation classes). A delegate must be a full-time, permanent employee of the City of Foster City.
Section 4 – Contract Terms
When If entering into a contracting for perpetual, on-going services (e.g. regular maintenance work, regular janitorial services, etc.), the Purchasing Authority shall endeavor to contract for initial terms of at least three (3) years. Reasonable extensions to contract terms may be exercised if included within the original agreement along with process and timing for exercising those extensions.
Section 5 – Dollar Limits
The following dollar limits and approval authorities are established for procuring public contracts; supplies, services and equipment; and professional services. Subsequent changes to the dollar limits and/or approving authority are subject to City Council approval by resolution.
The following tables indicate the proper procurement method for contracts, purchases, and procurement of services under the requirements of the California Public Contract Code and Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System.
When contracting for an item or one-time/temporary service, the value of the contract for purposes of identifying the proper procurement method shall be the total compensation paid to the vendor/contractor/service provider, excluding contingency.
When contracting for perpetual, on-going services (e.g. regular maintenance work, regular janitorial services, etc.), the value of an on-going service contract – regardless of its term – shall
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
193
4 be the estimated cost of procuring the service for three (3) years. For example, a maintenance service contract which will compensate the contractor in an amount not-to-exceed $20,000 annually shall be considered a $60,000 contract for the purpose of establishing the proper procurement method based on dollar limits.
Federally-funded contracts and purchases must adhere to the federal guidelines, as outlined in Section 6 of this Policy.
A.Public Contract Code (no federal funds used)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level 1 – Force account (City employees) or
No bid requirements (Section 3.04.180)
City Manager
or Designee
<$75,000 or up to the Informal
Bid Limit Pursuant to Public
Contract Code Section 22032
Level 2 – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.190) (Note: If all bids received are in
excess of the Informal Bid limit set forth in
Public Contract Code section 22032, the
governing body of the public agency may, by
adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote,
award the contract, up to $235,000 or the limit
set forth in Public Contract Code section
22034(d), if it determines the cost estimate of
the public agency was reasonable.)
City Council > $75,000 and < $220,000
or Informal Bid Limit Pursuant
to Public Contract Code
Section 22032 except where
alternative procurement
processes are allowed by state
law (e.g., CA Government
Code Section 4217)
Level 3 – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.200, et seq), Council approval required
City Council > $220,000 or Formal Bid Limit
Pursuant to Public Contract
Code Section 22032 except
where alternative procurement
processes are allowed by
state law (e.g., CA
Government Code Section
4217)
B.Purchases of Supplies, Equipment, and Services (excluding Professional Services) (no federal funds used)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level A – No bid requirements
(open market) (Section 3.04.060)
City Manager or Designee < $10,000
Level B – Informal bid procedures
(Section 3.04.070)
City Manager > $10,000 and < $50,000
Level C – Formal bid procedures
(Section 3.04.080), Council
approval required
RFP: City Manager
Agreement/Purchase:
City Council
> 50,000*
C.Purchases of Professional Services
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
194
5 Level D – City Manager approval of
RFP and award of Contract (Sect.
3.04.140)
City Manager < $50,000
Level E – City Council Manager
approval of RFP
and City Council award of Contract
(Sect 3.04.140)
RFP: City Manager
Agreement/Purchase:
City Council
> $50,000
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
195
6 Section 6 – Procurement Requirements for Federally-Funded Contracts and Purchases
Federally-funded contracts/purchases must adhere to criteria specified under Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Section 2 - CFR § 200.317-200.326, to comply with the Uniform Guidance (UG) procurement requirements. These requirements differ from those under the California Public Contract Code and the City’s procurement guidelines. Any contract or purchase using federal funds must comply with the methods specified in the following tables.
A.Federally-Funded Public Works Contracts
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level 1 – Force account (City employees) or
No bid requirements
(Section 3.04.180)
City Manager or
Designee
< $3,500
Level 2 – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.190) (Note: If all bids received exceed
the Informal Bid Limit, City Council may by
4/5 vote award contract to
lowest responsible bidder for up to an
additional 10% of that Limit
City Council > $3,500 and < $150,000 or
Informal Bid Limit Pursuant to 2
C.F.R. § 200.320
Level 3 – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.200, et seq), Council approval required
City Council > $150,000 or Informal Bid Limit
Pursuant to
2 C.F.R. § 200.320
B.Federally-Funded Purchases of Supplies, Equipment, and Services (excluding Professional Services)
Purchasing Method Approving
Authority
Dollar Limit
Level A – No bid requirements (open
market) (Section 3.04.060)
City Manager or
Designee
< $3,500
Level B – Informal bid procedures (Sect
3.04.070)
City Manager > $3,500 and < $50,000
Level C – Formal bid procedures (Sect.
3.04.080), Council approval required
City Council > 50,000
Section 7 - Affirmative Action Penalties
Contractors in violation of Fair Employment Practices Act or other similar federal law; per person, per day, for each day the person was discriminated against: $100 per person, per day (updated 2007, Ordinance 563 § 2 (part))
Section 8 – Surplus Equipment and Supplies
On occasion, the City may desire to sell used or surplus equipment and/or supplies. The concept is that the City will receive fFunds from the sale of said surplus assets to will be recognized as revenues and deposited into reserves.
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
196
7 A.Sale of Surplus Assets. Departments must obtain prior written authorization from the City Manager (or his/her designee) to sell surplus assets in accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Chapter 3.04, Purchasing System, and this policy.
Surplus assets may be used as “trade-in” value with a vendor from whom replacement assets are purchased without the need for public sale of said assets. Otherwise, state and local law prohibit gifting of public funds to any individual or entity. Accordingly, the City shall use open methods in selling off surplus assets. Departments are authorized to use the following means of selling surplus assets in an open forum:
•Auctions – including City-run auctions, auction houses, online auctions (e.g., eBay)
•Sealed bids – sealed bids received and opened at a pre-specified time and place •Sales offers – under limited circumstances, the City may entertain offers from sole buyers (including City employees) to purchase surplus assets only after other open methods of disposing said assets are exhausted.
Departments must ensure that sale of any such assets are publicly noticed. Public notice of online auctions can be achieved through publicizing City-authorized online auctions on the City’s web site in an easily found location that links users to the online auction web site.
All funds received from sale of surplus assets must be recognized as revenue to the City (not as an offset to an expenditure).
B.Donating Surplus Assets. Subject to City Council approval, surplus equipment and/or supplies may be donated to local organizations, including but not limited to: school districts, public or private schools, service organizations, and non-profit organizations.
Unless expressly authorized by Council resolution, such assets shall have been determined to have little or no market value using open methods of public sale prior to being donated to local organizations. Organizations that provide services directly in or to Foster City residents or businesses shall have first priority.
Section 9 –Procurement of Recycled-Content Paper Products A.In accordance with Foster City Municipal Code Section 3.04.095, if fitness and quality of recycled-content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper are equal to that of non-recycled items, Purchasing Authorities shall purchase recycled- content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, whenever available at the same or a lesser total cost than non-recycled items, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contracts Code, Sections 22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as amended.
B.Recycled-content paper products include, but are not limited to:
• Office Supplies: file folders, hanging file folders, white wove envelopes, manila envelopes, index cards, cartons, wrapping, packaging, corrugated boxes • Writing and Printing Papers: copy, xerographic, watermark, cotton fiber, offset, note pads, computer printout paper, writing tablets, other uncoated writing papers
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
197
8 • Printed Materials: calendars, brochures, reports, magazines, publications, posters, newsprint, book paper, forms
• Paper Janitorial Supplies: toilet paper, toweling, facial tissue, toilet seat covers C.All paper products and printing and writing paper must be eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
D.Purchasing Authorities will be responsible for obtaining records pertaining to procurement of recovered organic waste products and recycled-content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper, and shall input all data and digital copies of invoices, receipts, or other proofs of purchase that describe the procurement of printing and writing paper and paper products into the City’s SB 1383 Implementation Record to document its compliance with 14 CCR Section 18993.3. Records shall include a copy of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications for recycled-content purchases, vendor name, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content, and if non-recycled-content paper products and/or non-recycled- content printing and writing paper are procured, include a description of why recycled- content paper products and/or recycled- content printing and writing paper were not provided.
Section 10 – Procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Compost and/or Mulch A.Any department or individual procuring compost for or on behalf of the City shall procure compost that meets the definition in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as of the effective date of this policy, that “Compost” means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic Solid Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility.
Compost eligible for meeting the City’s Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target must be produced at a compostable material handling operation or facility permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division 7 or produced at a large volume in-vessel digestion facility that Composts on-site as defined and permitted under 14 CCR Chapter 3.2 of Division 7. Compost shall meet the State’s composting operations regulatory requirements.
B.Any department or individual procuring mulch for or on behalf of the City shall procure mulch pursuant to 14 CCR Chapter 12 of Division 7 that meets the conditions for the duration of the applicable procurement compliance year, as specified by 14 CCR Section 18993.1(f)(4).
•Produced at either a compostable material handling operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(12), that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7, other than a chipping and grinding operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10), OR a transfer/processing facility or transfer/processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; OR, a solid waste landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27 CCR Division
2. •Meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration, and pathogen density standards for land application specified in 14 CCR Sections 17852(a)(24.5)(A)1 through 3.
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
198
9 Section 11 – Employee Reimbursement of Benefits-Related Expenses Employees are eligible for reimbursements of a variety of employment-related benefits, including but not limited to: vision, professional development expenses, uniform reimbursements, job- related footwear, and other benefits which may be part of negotiated benefits packages in Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with bargaining groups or compensation and benefits plans (C&B Plan) for unrepresented employees.
Employees shall submit requests for reimbursement of approved reimbursable expenses after those expenses are incurred by the employee. The request shall first be approved by the Department Head or his/her designee, then be approved by the Human Resources Department to ensure compliance with the provisions of the applicable MOU or C&B Plan.
Expenditures shall be accounted for as fringe benefits in the appropriate department budget.
Section 12 – Procurement (Credit) Cards
The City has created a Procurement (Credit) Card Program to assist departments in purchasing from vendors that either do not accept purchase orders, or otherwise to improve the efficiency of processing small dollar item purchases. A Credit Card Program policy has been issued and is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 13 – Exclusion of Alcoholic Beverages
In general, City funds shall not be used to purchase alcoholic beverages and such expenditures are explicitly prohibited unless specifically approved in advance by a Department Head or the City Manager for rare special City events where serving alcoholic beverages would be appropriate, such as grand openings or citizen volunteer appreciation events.
Section 14 – City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy
In accordance with California Government Code § 53232.1-.4, the City Council has adopted a City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy as of January 3, 2006. This Policy establishes guidelines regarding reimbursable expenses for City Councilmembers, and is required by law effective January 1, 2006.
The Policy is incorporated by reference herein. This Policy applies to the City Council as City Councilmembers and Estero Municipal Improvement District Directors.
Section 15 – Disaster Procurement Policy
The City Manager shall develop and implement a separate Disaster Procurement Policy to supplement the City’s normal purchasing practices to assure that, in both emergency and exigent circumstances caused by a proclaimed disaster or emergency, the City is able to acquire the goods and services required to address an immediate threat to life safety, public health, or to eliminate or reduce an immediate threat of significant damage to improved public and private property through cost-effective measures while still maintaining an effective purchasing process that meets applicable California and federal purchasing laws for cost recovery and reimbursement.
8.1 Attachment 5 - Purchasing Policy Red-lined
199
DATE:April 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA:Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM:Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Justin Lai, Senior Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department
SUBJECT:RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT (CIP 301-678)
GENERAL UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, by Minute Order, receive and accept the update report on the Recreation Center Rebuild Project (Project). This is an informational report only. No further action is required.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff will provide a verbal update of the latest Project activities at the City Council meeting. The Project update will consist of this staff report and the attached Construction Manager’s Report. Some of the notable highlights from the past months of the Project include:
•BHM Construction, LLC. (BHM) completed the installation of 178 piles for the building’s foundation.
•BHM took over the Bocce Court area and began clearing and grading the site. •PG&E coordination continued for temporary and permanent power. •Utility installation began for the site.
9.1 9.1 Staff Report
200
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
During the month of February, BHM surveyed the building pad layout to prepare for the 178 piles to be installed for the foundation. The rebar cages for the foundations were constructed and brought to the site for installation with proper inspections being performed. Site work continued with the removal of existing utilities and additional clearing. This included taking over the bocce court area for clearing and grading.
Towards the end of February, the installation of the building’s foundation piles commenced and was completed successfully in March with little to no complaints from the public. With the completion of the piles, the construction of the pile caps and underground utilities were a major focus. Several trenches and utilities were installed on the site and more grading was performed with an emphasis on the future bioretention areas.
Throughout the past two months, there have been several rainy days which have not been too detrimental due to the City approving the lime treatment of the building, which helps stabilize the site and allows the contractor to work quickly following the rain. BHM continues to coordinate with the City and PG&E for temporary power and is expected to have temporary power in April.
Additional unforeseen conditions were found during the excavation and underground utility work, which will result in change orders, but they have not been formalized yet.
Staff will inform the City Council of any executed change orders at the following City Council update, but currently there have been no additional change orders executed since the last update. The design team, Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, continues to coordinate on submittals and other requests from the contractor, such as clarifications on products or installation methods. Underground work and grading are expected to continue in April and additional information on the site activities can be found in the Construction Manager’s Reports attached.
Estimated Schedule
Production Piles February 2025 – March 2025
Site Work, Underground Utilities and Grading February 2025 – October 2025 Foundation and Structural Framing March 2025 – August 2025 Building Exterior Framing and Envelope September 2025 – December 2025 Interior Framing & Mechanical, Electrical, and
Plumbing
September 2025 – April 2026
Interior Finishes and Closeout April 2026 – July 2026
Project Completion July 2026
9.1 9.1 Staff Report
201
CEQA
In July 2023, the City of Foster City, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by the Secretary of Resources, and the City of Foster City Environmental Review Guidelines, prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH # 20231009) with Standards Conditions and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (SCAMMRP), and CEQA Findings (IS/MND) for the Recreation Center Rebuild Project.
On November 16, 2023, the City Planning Commission adopted the IS/MND and approved the Use Permit for the Project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), the City prepared an Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the temporary Modular Buildings portion of the work.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this update. Any fiscal impacts to the Project will be presented to the City Council as a separate agenda item with a recommended action. The construction budget can be seen on the attached Construction Manger’s Report.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025 Attachment 2 – Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025 Attachment 3 – Contract Change Order Summary Sheet
9.1 9.1 Staff Report
202
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Report Period: February 1 – 28, 2025
General Contractor: BHM Construction LLC
Construction Manager: Griffin Structures
Architect of Record: Group 4 Architecture
Introduction
The Foster City Recreation Center Rebuild Project continued making steady progress throughout February 2025, focusing on foundational work, site utilities, and critical path activities . This month’s primary accomplishments included the commencement of auger pile production drilling, advancement in temporary power installations, and execution of significant site excavation for stormwater management and underground utilities.
With the critical path primarily centered on the foundation, underground utilities, and structural framing, key efforts were dedicated to keeping these elements on schedule. The project team coordinated closely with subcontractors, city representatives, and the design team to mitigate potential schedule risks, particularly related to materials procurement and inspections. Despite wet site conditions affecting some productivity, the project remains on track with no officially recorded delays.
This report provides an overview of construction progress, key challenges, upcoming activities, budget updates, and the project’s critical path milestones as of February 2025.
Contract Schedule Summary:
NTP Issuance 11/04/24
Contract Duration 608 Calendar Days
Substantial Completion 06/17/26
Contract Final Completion 07/05/26
Approved Extension Days 0
Anticipated Completion Date 07/05/26
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
203
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Note: While no official weather days were added this month, rains caused significant site saturation and impacted scheduled activities (auger production pile layout).
Construction Activities Completed February 2025
Building Pad & Foundation Work
• Finalized layout for production piles, incorporating survey verification of pile locations. Rebar cages for production piles delivered and staged for installation. • Initiated auger pile drilling on February 20, 2025, with ongoing inspections by Apex and Romig for material verification and quality control during drilling activities.
Site Work & Utility Installations
• Successfully installed and tested temporary power infrastructure, including the switchgear pad and associated trenching. Mandrel inspections by PG&E were scheduled at the end of February, advancing permanent power coordination.
• Continued extensive excavation, grading, and compaction efforts for bioswale and stormwater management areas, maintaining compliance with required compaction standards despite wet soil conditions.
• Demolished and removed existing underground utilities, including significant quantities of asbestos piping. Site demolition work progressed effectively and safely, following environmental protocols for hazardous materials disposal.
• Stormwater discharge compliance confirmed by QSP inspection, with weir tanks fully operational to manage water during wet site conditions.
Bocce Court Area Development
• Cleared, grubbed, and completed initial excavation for new bioswales and stormwater management systems.
• Initiated coordination for electrical and site lighting, including evaluation of alternative temporary power sources for bocce lighting pending PG&E availability. • Concrete formwork and reinforcing preparations underway; shop drawings for shade structures and related components submitted and under review.
Building Mock-Up & Structural Detailing
• Completed structural steel RFIs critical to main package submissions, facilitating detailed shop drawings preparation by mid-February.
• Regular coordination meetings held weekly to address steel detailing, mock -up, and curtain wall design elements, ensuring timely resolution of outstanding RFIs.
Construction Activities Planned for March 2025
Foundation Work
• Continue production pile installation with active oversight from special inspectors. Start excavation activities for electrical vaults, elevator pits, and pile caps/grade beams upon completion of auger piles.
Utility & Infrastructure
• Install deep electrical and plumbing underground beneath building pad areas. • Continue storm drainage installation, pending receipt of precast components, and initiate electrical vault excavation.
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
204
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Steel Fabrication & Mock-Up
• Finalize structural steel mock-up details, ensuring all remaining steel RFIs and submittals are approved.
• Begin detailed steel fabrication based on approvals received.
Permitting & Inspections
• Conduct city inspections of production piles installation. • Secure approvals for fire water underground plans and encroachment permits. • Complete PG&E mandrel inspections and confirm temporary power installation acceptance.
Key Challenges:
Site Perimeter and Safety Considerations
• High winds resulted in temporary site fencing instability, requiring modifications and reinforcement. • Additional bracing and selective removal of screening materials were implemented to prevent recurring issues.
Wet Site Conditions and Productivity Adjustments
• While no official inclement weather days were recorded, frequent rain events affected soil conditions, slowing excavation, grading, and pile drilling activities. The construction team implemented temporary dewatering measures, grading adjustments, and reinforcement of site access poi nts to maintain productivity.
Material Procurement and Coordination
• Mitigating delays in rebar cage deliveries and precast storm drain components required close monitoring and schedule adjustments.
• Coordination between subcontractors, engineers, and material suppliers continued to ensure on-time delivery of structural steel and underground utilities.
Permit Approvals and Utility Coordination
• Encroachment permit approval for parking lot modifications remained in process by BHM. • Fire water underground plan review completed, with pending revisions by the Contractor and approval needed before installation could begin.
Budget Updates:
Change Order #2 (Executed February 2025)
Following City approval of the associated CORs in January 2025, CCO #2 was formally executed this month to incorporate the changes into the contract. CCO #2 addressed several unforeseen site conditions identified during demolition and early site work.
Specific items included:
• COR #3 & COR #10: Removal and safe disposal of unforeseen asbestos cement piping discovered onsite, totaling approximately 797 linear feet, to maintain compliance with environmental safety standards ($11,748.00).
• COR #4.1: Repair and relocation of an unforeseen live electrical conduit discovered damaged during demolition activities ($6,901.00).
• COR #5: Removal and disposal of an unforeseen vapor barrier attached to the underside of the existing concrete slab, affecting demolition sequencing ($145,594.00).
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
205
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
• COR #7: Handling additional unforeseen concrete slab thickness, requiring increased demolition effort and additional disposal activities ($12,026.00). • COR #11.1: Lime treatment of the building pad soil, implemented to stabilize wet, unstable site conditions, allowing continued site progress through winter months ($35,700.00).
These changes have been fully executed, resulting in the adjusted contract amount shown below.
No additional Change Order Requests were submitted or processed during this reporting period.
The project team monitors and tracks potential cost impacts related to unforeseen conditions and design clarifications through contractor RFIs.
Contract and Contingency Financial Overview:
Original Contract Amount $44,626,000.00
Contingency (10%) $4,462,600.00
Executed Contract Change Orders $219,610.00
Total Adjusted Contract Amount $44,845,610.00
Contingency Remaining $4,242,990.00
Contingency % Remaining 95%
Total Completed and Stored to Date $ 4,097,665.98
% of Contracts billed to Date 9.18%
Summary
February 2025 marked significant progress in foundational construction, underground utilities, and temporary power activation—all of which are crucial critical path milestones.
Key accomplishments included:
• Successful commencement of production pile installation, a major structural milestone. • Advancement of deep utility infrastructure, including storm drains, electrical, and plumbing. • Progress in site demolition and clearing, enabling future hardscape and structural work. • Coordination of temporary power inspections with PG&E, supporting long-term site operations.
• Finalization of structural steel RFIs, maintaining momentum toward fabrication and future erection.
The project remains on track, with no current or anticipated delays reported. The team continues to monitor weather conditions, material lead times, and regulatory approvals to ensure ongoing efficiency
Note: This report is a monthly update for the Foster City Recreation Center Rebuild Project, highlighting key construction activities, upcoming tasks, challenges, and budgetary considerations.
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
206
Site fencing reinforced with additional stakes and rope.
Pedestrian pathway monitored surface run off from site.
Temporary power infrastructure in progress.
Auger piles to continue following approved test results.
Building pad firm following lime treatment.
Double silt fencing and wattle in place.
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
207
Bocce Court Hardscape Demolition
Weir tank plumbed and inspected
Weir Tank Used for Site Dewatering
Site SWPPP and BMPs Maintained
Building Pad Solidification from Lime Treatment
Soil Stockpiles Covered and BMPs in Place
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
208
Building Pad Pending Production Pile Activity
Production Pile Rebar Cage Delivery
Production Pile Rebar Cage Delivery
Existing Storm Drain Exposed for New Manhole
Additional Weir Tank Delivered for Site Dewatering
Production Pile Drilling Started
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
209
Bocce Court Demolition and Off-haul of Stockpiled Top Soil Auger Production Piles - Rebar Cage Installation
New Storm Drain Piping Installation in Progress
Auger Production Piles Installation
Auger Production Piles Installation
Auger Production Piles Installation
9.1 Attachment 1 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report February 2025
210
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Report Period: March 1 – 31, 2025
General Contractor: BHM Construction LLC
Construction Manager: Griffin Structures
Architect of Record: Group 4 Architecture
Introduction
The Foster City Recreation Center Rebuild Project maintained steady progress throughout March 2025, transitioning from auger pile drilling into foundational excavation and deep utility trenching. Despite intermittent rain and saturated conditions, key progress was made on structural layout, underground ut ility coordination, and pile cap preparations.
Temporary power was green-tagged by the city, with PG&E's meter set. Structural coordination activities increased this month with several deferred submittals under review, including the BRBs, structural steel, and mechanical systems. The project remains on track with no officially reported delays.
Contract Schedule Summary
NTP Issuance 11/04/24
Contract Duration 608 Calendar Days
Substantial Completion 06/17/26
Contract Final Completion 07/05/26
Approved Extension Days 0
Anticipated Completion Date 07/05/26
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
211
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Construction Activities Completed March 2025
Auger Pile and Foundation Work
• Completed installation of production auger piles.
• Auger pile concrete compression strength testing is ongoing by Apex, special inspector. • Initiated excavation for pile caps, grade beams, elevator pits, and electrical vaults. • Began pile chipping and formwork preparation; rebar deliveries staged for April. • Column templates and anchor bolts delivered and assembled.
Site Utilities and Stormwater Infrastructure
• Deep underground trenching for plumbing and electrical is underway. • Storm drain installation continued, with field adjustments prompted by unforeseen drainage conflicts and RFI responses.
• Firewater line layout initiated, traffic control planning in progress. • Temporary storm drain bypass installed near the bocce bioswale.
Power and Electrical Coordination
• City inspection for temporary power passed (2/27).
• PG&E meter installed; activation pending final scheduling. • Electrical vault excavation initiated with routing and support adjustments in review.
Waterproofing and Drainage
• Waterproofing scope commenced with pile caps and grade beams. • Initial drainage slope and downspout coordination meetings were held with design engineers.
General Site Management
• No major safety incidents were reported.
• Tree protection, site BMPs, dewatering measures, and erosion controls continued.
Construction Activities Planned for April 2025
Foundation & Structural Scope
• Continue pile cap and grade beam concrete placement.
• Formwork and waterproofing at elevator pit and vaults. • Begin slab-on-grade grading and compaction.
Utility and Sitework Progress
• Advance underground conduit and plumbing trenching.
• Continue storm drain and bioswale excavation per geotechnical recommendations. • Irrigation mainline investigation and conflict resolution.
Inspections & Submittals
• Special inspections for concrete, rebar, and waterproofing. • Finalize responses to deferred submittals and RFIs, including:
o Structural steel and BRBs
o Wet pipe sprinklers
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
212
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
o PV systems
o Canopies, storefronts, and grease waste systems
Power Coordination
• Await PG&E confirmation for full temporary power energization. • Continue coordination for permanent switchgear submittal and installation sequencing.
Key Challenges:
Underground Utilities
• Deep underground trenching progress was slowed by wet soil conditions and pending waterproofing/hanger details.
Storm Drain and Site Conflicts
• Unforeseen storm drainpipe discovered; required temporary rerouting and continued survey verification.
Temporary Power Activation
• PG&E meter set, but utility connection still awaiting scheduling; impact to on-site electrical planning.
Irrigation & Hardscape Coordination
• Shallow irrigation encountered may require rerouting ahead of hardscape installation.
Deferred Submittals
• Continued tracking of key submittals affecting structural and MEP scopes (BRBs, steel, mechanical systems).
Budget Updates:
No additional change orders were processed in March 2025. Several RFIs and submittals under review may impact contingency utilization in Q2.
Contract and Contingency Financial Overview:
Original Contract Amount $44,626,000.00
Contingency (10%) $4,462,600.00
Executed Contract Change Orders $219,610.00
Total Adjusted Contract Amount $44,845,610.00
Contingency Remaining $4,242,990.00
Contingency % Remaining 95%
Total Completed and Stored to Date $ 4,097,665.98
% of Contracts billed to Date 9.18%
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
213
FOSTER CITY RECREATION CENTER REBUILD PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MONTHLY REPORT (CIP 301-678)
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
Summary
March 2025 marked a pivotal transition from auger pile production to foundational development, with major progress achieved in deep trenching, pile cap layout, and site infrastructure. The project team completed all auger pile installations and launched excavations for key structural elements including grade beams, elevator pits, and electrical vaults.
Temporary power was green-tagged and metered, supporting upcoming construction needs.
Coordination efforts were also advanced across multiple fronts, including waterproofing details, drainage integration, and key submittals for structural steel and MEP sys tems. The team maintained proactive engagement with the design and inspection teams to ensure quality control, safety, and alignment with project goals.
With critical foundational work now underway, the project remains on track and is well -positioned for vertical construction activities to begin in the coming months.
Note: This report is a monthly update for the Foster City Recreation Center Rebuild Project, highlighting key construction activities, upcoming tasks, challenges, and budgetary considerations.
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
214
Remaining Auger Pile Rebar Cages for Installation
Remaining Auger Pile Grout Delivery Continues
Remaining Auger Pile Drilling
Storm Drain Manhole Base Rebar
Storm Drain Pipe Clean out and Tracer Wire
Bay Mud Spoils From Auger Pile Drilling
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
215
Power in Progress to Cathodic Protection
Wet/Saturated Site Conditions
Structural Anchor Bolts and Plates Assembled
Production Auger Pile Equipment Demobilized
Production Auger Piles Completed
Storm Drain Piping and Boxes in Progress
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
216
Foundation and Underground Utility Survey and Layout
Survey Equipment in Use
Excavations for Foundation
Excavations at Pile Caps and Grade Beams
Excavations at Auger Piles for New Foundation
Electrical Materials Delivered
9.1 Attachment 2 - Monthly Construction Manager's Report March 2025
217
Contract Change Order Summary Sheet
Original Construction Contract
Current Construction Contract
Original Contingency
$
$
$
$
44,626,000.00
44,845,610.00
4,462,600.00
4,242,990.00Remaining Contingency
Contract
Change Order
Number
Change Order
Request Number Description Price Execution Date
CCO#1
CCO#2
CCO#2
CCO#2
CCO#2
CCO#2
CCO#2
2.1 3
4.1 5
7 10
11.1 Unforeseen Plastic Cell Removal During Demolition
Handling and Disposal of Existing Asbestos Piping
Repair and Relocate Unforeseen Damaged Conduit
Unforeseen Vapor Barrier under Existing Bldg. Slab
Unforeseen Concrete Slab Thickness
$
$
$
7,641.00
4,284.00
6,901.00
12/17/2024
2/4/2024
2/4/2024
2/4/2024
2/4/2024
2/4/2024
2/4/2024
$ 145,594.00
$ 12,026.00
$Handling and Disposal of Additional Existing Asbestos Piping Lime Treatment of the Building Pad
7,464.00
$ 35,700.00
Total Change Orders $ 219,610.00
9.1 Attachment 3 - Contract Change Order Summary Sheet
218
8 9
7 DATE:April 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM:Derek Schweigart, Parks and Recreation Director
Frank Fanara, Parks Manager
DEPARTMENT:Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT:UPDATE ON THE INTEGRATED ADAPTIVE CANADA GOOSE
MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, by Minute Order, receive and accept the update on the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan Implementation and provide direction to staff regarding responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Implementation of the Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For many years, the City has struggled to effectively manage the growing Canada goose (CAGO) population, despite employing a variety of non-lethal mitigation strategies. Foster City’s environment continues to attract and sustain a large goose population, resulting in several negative impacts including excessive fecal matter in parks, turf degradation, declining lagoon water quality, increased public complaints, and higher maintenance costs.
On February 6, 2023, the Council approved an agreement with Wildlife Innovations, Inc. (City Resolution No. 2023-16) to prepare a comprehensive CAGO management plan, including all necessary California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation.
The plan encompassed a combination of habitat management, non-lethal deterrents, and potential removal strategies, supported by public education, stakeholder
9.2 9.2 Staff Report
219
8 9
7 engagement, cost-benefit analysis, and adaptive monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness and scalability across the region.
In February 2025, the City Council directed staff to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to identify a firm to assist in implementing the CAGO Plan. The City received two responses to the RFP with one other firm indicating they would not submit a proposal.
Upon review, only Wildlife Innovations met all project scope requirements; however, their proposed fee exceeded the anticipated cost for the pilot project implementation. As a result, staff are providing this update along with potential alternative options for the City Council to consider.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On February 6, 2023, the City Council approved an agreement with Wildlife Innovations (City Resolution No. 2023-16) to prepare the plan, including all necessary CEQA documentation. The CAGO Plan includes a review of existing CAGO population data and associated impacts, analysis of goose biology and relevant regulations, and evaluation of management strategies used in other jurisdictions. It also incorporates site-specific surveys, identification of conflicts in parks, open spaces, and short- and long-term objectives for population control. The plan encompasses a combination of habitat management, non-lethal deterrents, and potential removal strategies, supported by public education, stakeholder engagement, cost-benefit analysis, and adaptive monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness and scalability across the region. The federal depredation permit expired unused on July 31, 2023.
On December 2, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing to hear and receive comments regarding the CAGO Plan and the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City Council adopted the IS/MND with findings and Standard Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA for the CAGO Plan via City Resolution No. 2024-127. The City Council approved the CAGO Plan which provides a comprehensive framework for addressing the impacts of Canada geese. The plan outlines strategies to mitigate damage to turf, improve water quality, and reduce maintenance costs. It emphasizes humane and effective solutions, including habitat modification, population control measures, and public education.
At the regular City Council meeting on February 3, 2025, City Council, via Minute order No. 1878, received and accepted the Canada Goose Population Management Plan update and directed staff to issue a RFP to identify a company to assist in implementing the Plan. The recommendations in the CAGO Plan served as the foundation for the RFP to secure professional services to implement these strategies. The RFP scope included the implementation of a 3-year pilot program in three parks with the highest goose activity deploying a range of deterrent methods to evaluate their effectiveness.
Findings will help refine strategies for broader implementation in additional parks, ensuring efficient and sustainable long-term management. Staff developed the RFP
9.2 9.2 Staff Report
220
8 9
7 which was first advertised on February 20, 2025.
A total of two (2) proposals were received by the deadline on March 20, 2025 (Attachment 1 - Bid Results). Upon review, City staff determined that only the proposal from Wildlife Innovations addressed all components presented in the RFP. However, the proposed fee exceeded the anticipated cost for the pilot project implementation. The proposed scope of work and fee does not include the City’s current mitigation strategies deployed, which are power washing of high impact areas in City parks and egg addling which is a shared cost between Foster City and three neighboring cities. In addition, habitat modification which was identified as an important long term effective strategy was also not included and would need to be addressed as part of the Parks Master Plan and recommended park landscaping improvements. Due to the high bid received for the limited pilot project, staff are seeking the City Council’s direction on possible next steps, and have developed options for the City Council’s consideration:
1. Accept the Wildlife Innovations proposal for three (3) park pilot program and enter into a one-year agreement with two optional one-year extensions. The estimate for the first year is $386,520, or $1.158 million over three (3) years. This option has a high cost for limited impact but will effectively allow the consultant and staff to evaluate those hazing and other deterrents that are the most effective.
2. Modify the original scope by either reducing services and/or implementing a hybrid model, where tasks are performed by both the contractor and Parks Maintenance staff. There are some minor tasks that could be performed by maintenance staff with limited savings potential but reducing or modifying scope may reduce the effectiveness of the geese mitigation effort.
3. Reject all bids and reissue the RFP expanding the scope to include additional high impact parks identified in the Plan (the plan identified a total of 7 high impact parks), with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of the pilot project and potentially achieving cost savings through economies of scale. Additionally, the City may receive additional proposals from firms with the reissuance of the RFP.
4. Reject all bids and prioritize habitat modification in the 7 high impact parks which have the highest human-goose conflicts followed by other parks. Habitat modification recommendations would be guided by the Parks Master Plan, which is currently under development (estimated completion December 2025) and incorporates elements of the CAGO Plan into future park designs, landscaping and renovations designed to block clear line of sight to water bodies for the geese as well as eliminate food source. This option effectively postpones geese hazing and deterrent methods, in favor of long-term habitat modification in the parks. Hazing and other deterrents could come back to Council for future consideration as part of a robust implementation of the Plan and based on the effectiveness of the habitat modifications.
Staff are seeking the City Council’s direction on these options and depending on the direction received, will bring the item back to the City Council for further consideration. If the City Council directs the staff to accept Wildlife Innovations proposal, staff will finalize
9.2 9.2 Staff Report
221
8 9
7 project scope and fee and bring back an agreement for the City Council’s approval with implementation to begin around the July 2025 timeframe.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Not applicable. There is no impact in reviewing and accepting project update. At the December 2, 2024 the City Council via Resolution No. 2024-127 adopted the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), with all findings and standard conditions of approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Plan. Implementation of the Plan, including various management techniques, was contemplated as part of the IS/MND.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with accepting this report.
CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Bid Results
9.2 9.2 Staff Report
222
Wildlife
Innovations
Torpedo Pest
Control and K-9
Servicees
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
Per park assessment as
needed per the Integrated
Adaptive Management Plan
3 parks $6,720.00 $0.00
Per evaluation As needed $3,980.00 NO BID
$10,700.00 $0.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
Per visit Twice daily (5
days/week) $144,000.00 $168,000.00
Per visit As needed
(specify) $69,840.00 $8,400.00
Per session TBD based on
activity $69,840.00 NO BID
$9,040.00 NO BID
$292,720.00 $176,400.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
$39,550.00 NO BID
$17,160.00 NO BID
$56,710.00 $0.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
$6,370.00 NO BID
$6,370.00 $0.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
$6,720.00 NO BID
$6,720.00 $0.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
$6,460.00 NO BID
$6,840.00 NO BID
$13,300.00 $0.00
$386,520.00 $176,400.00
Unit Quantity
(Estimated) Total Cost ($) Total Cost ($)
$6,490.00 NO BID
$54,340.00 $1,800.00
Total for Optional Services $60,830.00 $1,800.00
$447,350.00 $3,600.00
Regulatory Compliance
Submit detailed reports (including data analysis and recommendations) Optional Services Descriptions
Public Outreach and Education
Optional Services Descriptions
Total all tasks and optional tasks
Integrated Canada Goose Management Plan RFP Bid Results Use of trained dogs to chase geese (includes handlers and equipment) Service Description
Conduct site assessments tailored to each park’s conditions (Marlin, Gull, Erckenbrack)
Evaluate park-specific challenges (e.g., proximity to water, nesting habits)
Hazing and Deterrent Techniques
Remote-controlled devices (e.g., drones) to deter geese activity Aversive conditioning (e.g., laser pointers, sound deterrents) Fogging using backpack style mobile mist blower emitting grape seed Monitoring and Metrics
Track success using GPS tools and measurable metrics (e.g., population reduction, water quality improvement)
Total for all tasks listed Above
Secure required permits to begin egg addling on Bair Island (Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge)
Conduct egg addling operations during nesting season and keep accurate records of total nests and eggs addled
Secure permits for chemical repellents as needed.
Adaptive Management and Maintenance
Refine strategies based on monitoring data and ongoing challenges Develop public education materials (e.g., signage, flyers, social media content)
Host or participate in community workshops or events as needed.
9.2 Attachment 1 - Bid Results
223
Prepared Date 3/27/2025 City of Foster City, CA
Accounts Payable Check Register