Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Foster City City Council
November 3, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 3, 2025
Body
Foster City City Council
Pages
36
Original file
66.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on fostercity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

6.3 Attachment 9 - Quote for Police Radio System Upgrade

104

Foster City Police Dept
Police Radio System Console Upgrade Eastern 5/2025 Quote Contract Item Part Number Description Qty Unit List Ext List Zetron_Monitors & Network Equipment 802-2423 MONITOR,LCD,24" WS,TOUCHSCREEN,CAPACIT 3 3,228.00$ 9,684.00$ Zetron_Monitors & Network Equipment 950-1280 MAX-D 48 PORT (NON-POE) MANAGED GIGABIT 2 4,703.00$ 9,406.00$ Zetron_Product Service Plans XMP-0344-EBS-4 MAX-PSP Extended Serv Plan (4YR) 3 8,056.00$ 24,168.00$ Zetron_Product Service Plans XMP-0344-BAS MAX-PSP Base Service Plan 3 1.00$ 3.00$ Zetron Total 183,095.00$
Notes:
3 operator positions. Channel capability of 10 analog channels.

Console Hardware Total $183,095.00
Raven Conf Bridge $3,200.00
Misc Installation Supplies $2,500.00
Tax $17,699.53
Shipping $1,855.95
Console Hardware Total $208,350.48
CAT-5 Cable Installation $7,800.00
Console Installation Services $21,450.00
Services Total $29,250.00
Console Project Total $237,600.48

Page 6 of 6 ends

6.3 Attachment 9 - Quote for Police Radio System Upgrade

105

DATE: November 3, 2025

TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager

FROM: Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director
Chuck Venook, Chief Building Official
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 WITH 4LEAF, INC. FOR ON-

CALL BUILDING SERVICES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $875,000; APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATION OF $300,000 FOR FY 2025-26

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the Mayor to execute Contract Amendment No. 3 to the existing Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. (4Leaf) for professional on-call building services, to extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2027 and increase the amount of compensation by $550,000 for a total Agreement amount not to exceed $875,000; approving the supplemental appropriation of $300,000 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 to Account No. 001-0820-424-4251 from the General Fund Reserves; and find the request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Building Division has a limited staff comprised of six (6) full-time positions and one (1) temporary Principal Building Inspector position (recently approved) providing services related to all construction permit activity in the City. Over the last two (2) years, there have been significant ongoing challenges in staffing, including vacancies and staff absences.

6.4 6.4 Staff Report

106

Currently, there are only four (4) full-time personnel in the Building Division. Additionally, permit activity has significantly increased this year, especially commercial permits, and staff have been extensively relying on consulting services from 4Leaf and West Coast Code Consultants (WC3) to provide continuous and uninterrupted building services. WC3 has been providing plan check services and 4Leaf has been providing Permit Technician and building inspection services.

Currently, the Permit Technician and Principal Building Inspector positions are vacant, and the Senior Building Inspector is on extended leave. While the current agreement remains in effect through June 2026, the remaining balance of $24,000 will not be sufficient to continue supporting the City's needs for temporary staffing, specifically for the vacant Permit Technician and Building Inspector positions.

Gilead Sciences currently has two (2) lab buildings under construction and additional building anticipated at Chess Hatch site in early 2025. This requires a dedicated permit technician for permit processing and a Principal/Senior Building Inspector for inspections on almost daily basis. Given the number of buildings currently under construction and anticipated future projects upon approval of planning entitlements for Chess Hatch, these services cannot be provided at current building staffing levels.

Staff recommends that the City Council via attached Resolution approve Contract Amendment No. 3 with 4Leaf, increasing the not-to-exceed amount by $550,000 (the estimated costs of providing services in FY 25-26 and FY 26-27), extending the term to June 30, 2027, and approving a supplemental appropriation of $300,000 for services during FY 25-26. The cost of the agreement for FY 26-27 will be included in the proposed budget.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Community Development Department (CDD) is committed to planning, maintaining, and improving the quality of life and public safety of Foster City in keeping with the vision of the City Council in the General Plan and other measures that reflect the City’s heritage as a Master Planned community. CDD is comprised of the Planning/Code Enforcement, Housing/Sustainability, and Building Divisions.

The Building Division is responsible for ensuring that all construction projects permitted within the City comply with the California Building Code, the Foster City Municipal Code, and all other applicable codes and regulations. The Building Division provides permit intake, plan check, and building inspection services to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Codes.

Currently, the Building Division is staffed by one (1) Chief Building Official (CBO), one (1) Plans Examiner, three (3) Inspectors, and two (2) Permit Technicians, which proves challenging during staff absences due to vacation, training, illness, and 9/80 off days, as well as during periods when positions are vacant and recruitment is underway.

6.4 6.4 Staff Report

107

Over the last two (2) years, there have been significant challenges in staffing, including vacancies and staff absences. Currently, of the seven (7) authorized full time positions (FTEs), two (2) are vacant and one (1) has been on extended leave since June 2, 2025.

These vacancies and absences pose a significant challenge in providing continuous and uninterrupted services. Therefore, staff have been using current on-call consulting services with 4Leaf and WC3 to augment staffing needs.

On July 15, 2024, the City Council approved professional on-call building service agreements with 4Leaf and WC3 in an amount not to exceed $150,000 each for two (2) years ending June 30, 2026, to provide coverage during staff absences, ensuring continuity of services, increased flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced customer satisfaction.

On April 7, 2025, Contract Amendment No. 1 to the on-call building service agreement with 4Leaf in the amount of $75,000 was approved for continuing on-call building services. At the time, the unspent personnel budget from the vacant CBO position was used to fund the agreement.

On July 21, 2025, Contract Amendment No. 2 to the on-call building service agreement with 4Leaf in the amount of $100,000 was approved for continuing on-call building services through a supplemental appropriation.

Since July 2024, 4Leaf has been providing services for staff augmentation for various building services.

There are currently several large and complex projects underway in the City that are identified below. This is in addition to numerous additions to homes, modifications to homes, and commercial tenant improvements that occur on a regular basis. Major projects under construction include:
Foster City’s new Community Center
Gilead Lab Building at 331 Lakeside Dr.
Gilead Lab Building at 335 Lakeside Dr.
Osaka Marketplace tenant improvements at Edgewater Shopping Center There are also several Tenant Improvement and construction projects anticipated to commence in the next few months, which are identified below:
Visa - Full interior renovation of the twelve-story buildings (M1 & M2 towers) from level 5 through 12, approx. 573,237 square feet.
Lab Building at Chess Hatch (upon entitlement approval) Multi-family ADUs at two (2) different locations
Recognizing the increase in construction activity, on September 15, 2025, the City Council approved a three-year temporary Principal Building Inspector position.

6.4 6.4 Staff Report

108

The recruitment for the two (2) vacant positions (Permit Technician and Principal Building Inspector) is underway and can take anywhere between three (3) to six (6) months before the position is successfully filled. In recent times, filling vacancies and finding qualified candidates has been a challenge, given the current job market, and when competing with other jurisdictions that have similar job openings.

The remaining balance in the 4Leaf contract is approximately $24,000 (October invoice is not received yet, and has been estimated), which is insufficient to continue providing uninterrupted services to the community. Although funds remain available in the WC3 contract, they are unable to provide building inspections and permit technician services.

The City has adopted a Master Fees & Service Charges Schedule, which specifies the payment for all processing costs associated with the review of applications for building permits. The costs of services related to building permits and associated inspections are covered by the applicable building and inspection fees charged by the City. However, the City must have the staffing to be able to provide those services and therefore the amendment with 4Leaf is necessary to ensure that services are not interrupted.

As noted earlier, Gilead currently has two (2) lab buildings under construction on its main campus and is anticipating an additional lab building on the Chess Hatch site, pending entitlements approvals. These projects require substantial staff time for permit processing (from intake through issuance), multiple plan reviews and numerous inspections at all stages of construction. Gilead and the City will be entering into a cost reimbursement agreement relating to the funding for building consulting services to support these efforts.

The breakdown of 4Leaf contract and subsequent amendments including source of fundings is shown in the table below:

Consultant Agreement
Date
Amount Source of Funding Impact on
General Fund
4Leaf July 15, 2024 $150,000 General Fund $150,000
Amendment
#1
April 7, 2025 $75,000 Unspent Salary from
vacant CBO position
None
Amendment
#2
July 21, 2025 $100,000 General Fund $150,000
Proposed
Amendment
#3
Nov 3, 2025 $550,000:
$300,000 (FY25-26)
and
$250,000 (FY26-27)
General Fund, to be
largely offset by
reimbursement from
Gilead including cost
reimbursement and
unspent personnel
budget authority.

None (After
reimbursement
from Gilead
including cost
reimbursement
and unspent
personnel
budget)*
Note: Staff has estimated $25k for Gilead projects per month (30 hours per week) and rest of the funds from unspent personnel budget from vacant positions.

California Environmental Quality Act

6.4 6.4 Staff Report

109

The approval of Contract Amendment No. 3 to the existing agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. (4Leaf) for professional on-call building services is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, then the activity is not subject to CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT
The agreement for on-call services includes building inspections, permit support services, and plan reviews. Therefore, for staff augmentation services, staff is requesting a supplemental appropriation of $300,000 for Building Division professional services (Account No. 001-0820-424-4251) in FY 2025-26 from the General Fund Reserves.

However, there will be no fiscal impact as the majority of the cost is anticipated to be offset by fees charged for the services, including the reimbursement of costs from Gilead and unspent salary budget from vacant positions. The cost of the agreement for FY26- 27 will be included in the proposed budget.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Smart Planning, Development, and the Local Economy
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Contract Agreement No. 3
Attachment 3 – 4Leaf Agreement and Contract Amendments

6.4 6.4 Staff Report

110

4898-0699-3781 v1
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE EXISTING AGREEMENT WITH 4LEAF, INC. (4LEAF) FOR PROFESSIONAL ON-CALL BUILDING SERVICES, TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE AGREEMENT TO JUNE 30, 2027 AND INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION BY $550,000 FOR A TOTAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $875,000; APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $300,000 FOR BUILDING DIVISION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (ACCOUNT NO. 001-0820-424-4251) FROM THE

GENERAL FUND RESERVES, AND FINDING THE REQUEST EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the Building Division is responsible for ensuring that all construction projects permitted within the City comply with the California Building Code, the Foster City Municipal Code, and all other applicable codes and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Building Division has a limited staff comprising of six (6) full time positions and one (1) temporary position (recently approved Principal Building Inspector) providing services related to all construction permit activity in the City, and limited staffing poses a significant challenge in providing continuous and uninterrupted building division services; and
WHEREAS, to address these challenges, on July 15, 2024, the City Council approved professional on-call building service agreements with 4LEAF, Inc. (4Leaf) and West Coast Code Consultants, Inc. (WC3) in an amount not to exceed $150,000 each to provide coverage during staff absences, ensuring continuity of services, increased flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced customer satisfaction for a period to two years ending June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the City Council approved Contract Amendment No. 1 to the existing agreement with 4Leaf in an additional amount of $75,000; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2025, Contract Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $100,000 was added to the 4Leaf agreement for continuing on-call building services through a supplemental appropriation; and
WHEREAS, the remaining funds in the 4Leaf agreement will not be enough to ensure staffing coverage during upcoming training or unforeseen absences and vacancies; and
WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the City Council approve contract amendment No. 3 to the existing Contract Agreement with 4Leaf for professional on-call building services, including additional amount of $550,000 and extending the term to June 30, 2027 and a supplemental appropriation of $300,000 for Building Division professional services (account No. 001-0820-424-4251) from the General Fund reserves.

6.4 Attachment 1 - Resolution

111

4898-0699-3781 v1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute Contract Amendment No. 3 to the existing Agreement with 4Leaf, to extend the term to June 30, 2027, and increase compensation by $550,000 for a total maximum contract amount not to exceed $875,000.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council hereby approves a supplemental appropriation of $300,000 for Building Division professional services (account No. 001- 0820-424-4251) for FY25-26 from the General Fund reserves.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 3 to the existing Agreement with 4Leaf, with minor amendments in a form approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 3rd day of November, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

6.4 Attachment 1 - Resolution

112

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. THREE (3)
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2025
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 001-0820-419-4251
PROJECT NAME: ON-CALL BUILDING SERVICES
TO: 4LEAF, INC.

CHANGE REQUESTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND 4LEAF, INC.

Based on mutual agreement, 4Leaf, Inc. and City of Foster City agree to amend the original Agreement dated July 16, 2024 (“Agreement”) pursuant to Section 17 of the Agreement to extend the Services identified in Exhibit A (Scope of Services) and increase the compensation as follows:

1.Section 2(a) of the Agreement and Exhibit A shall be revised to amend the term of the Agreement as follows:

The term of this Agreement shall commence on July 16, 2024, and shall expire on June 30, 2027.

2.Section 3 of the Agreement is amended to add additional compensation amounts for the ongoing services which are identified as follows:

ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT $150,000
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) $ 75,000
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2) $ 100,000
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. THREE (2) $ 550,000
TOTAL MAXIMUM CONTRACT AMOUNT $875,000
The increased Agreement maximum is necessary to continue using 4Leaf for on-call building services, given their familiarity with ongoing projects and consistent availability.

6.4 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 3

113

Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
4Leaf, Inc. has given careful consideration to the amendments identified herein and agrees that if this Contract Amendment No. 3 is approved, to provide all equipment, furnish all materials except as may otherwise be noted above, and to perform all services necessary for the work, and to accept as full payment therefore the prices shown in the Agreement as amended herein.

SUBMITTED BY: _______________________________________

BECKI HANAN DATE

SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ACCEPTED BY:

KEVIN J. DUGGAN, PRESIDENT DATE
4LEAF, INC.

APPROVED FOR CITY:

STACY JIMENEZ DATE
MAYOR
ATTEST:

BY:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

BENJAMIN L. STOCK, CITY ATTORNEY DATE

6.4 Attachment 2 - Contract Amendment No. 3

114

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

PROFESSIONAL ON- CALL BUILDING SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 16th day of July, 2024 by and between the City of Foster City hereinafter called " CITY" and 4Leaf, Inc. hereinafter called CONSULTANT".

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into with reference to the following facts and circumstances:

WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide professional services in the CITY;
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to provide such services to the CITY and; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereby agree as follows :

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Services. The services to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall include those services set forth in Exhibit A, which is, by this reference, incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though it were fully set forth herein.

Performance of the work specified in said Exhibit A is hereby made an obligation of CONSULTANT under this Agreement, subject to any changes that may be made subsequently hereto upon the mutual written agreement of the said parties.

Where in conflict, the terms of this Agreement supersede and prevail over any terms set forth in Exhibit A.

2. Term; Termination. ( a) The term of this Agreement shall commence on July 16, 2024 and shall expire on June 30, 2026. ( b) Notwithstanding the provisions of ( a) above, CITY may with or without cause, direct CONSULTANT to suspend, delay or interrupt Services, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as CITY may determine in its sole discretion. ( c) CITY may terminate performance of the Services under this Agreement in whole, or from time to time in part, for default, should CONSULTANT commit a material breach of this Agreement, or part thereof, and not cure such breach within ten ( 10) calendar days of the date of CITY’s written notice to CONSULTANT demanding such cure, in which case CONSULTANT shall be liable to CITY for all loss, cost, expense, damage Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

115

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
and liability resulting from such breach and termination. ( d) CITY may terminate performance of the Services under this Agreement in whole, or from time to time in part, for convenience, whenever CITY determines that such termination is in CITY’s best interests, in which case CONSULTANT shall be entitled to recover its costs expended up to the termination date plus reasonable profit thereon to the termination date as this Agreement would otherwise provide, but may recover no other cost, damage or expense. CONSULTANT shall continue its work throughout the course of any dispute, and CONSULTANT’ s failure to continue work during a dispute shall be a material breach of this Agreement.

3. Compensation; Expenses; Payment. CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for all services performed by CONSULTANT hereunder in an amount based upon CONSULTANT’ s hourly rates during the time of the performance of said services. A copy of CONSULTANT’ s hourly rates for which services hereunder shall be performed are set forth in CONSULTANT’ s fee schedule marked Exhibit “ B” hereof, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the combined total of compensation and reimbursement of costs payable hereunder shall not exceed one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($ 150, 000). Invoices for amounts in excess of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($ 150, 000) shall not be paid unless the performance of services and/ or reimbursement of costs and expenses in excess of said amounts have been approved in advance of performing such services or incurring such costs and expenses by the City Manager for contracts less than $ 50,000) or City Council ( for contracts $ 50,000 or more) evidenced by motion duly made and carried and a written contract amendment having been executed.

Compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses hereunder shall be payable upon monthly billing therefor by CONSULTANT to CITY, which billing shall include an itemized statement, briefly describing by task and labor category or cost/ expense items billed. Final payment will be made when all Services required under this Agreement have been completed to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY including, without limitation, CONSULTANT' s transmittal of all deliverables to CITY required by EXHIBIT A.

CITY shall not incur any charges under this Agreement, nor shall any payments become due to CONSULTANT for any payment period on the Project, until CITY receives all deliverables required under Exhibit A, SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE, for the payment period ( if any) and reasonably accepts such deliverables as meeting the requirements of this Agreement. In cases where CONSULTANT has partially completed one or more deliverables due during a payment period, and if CONSULTANT demonstrates diligent progress thereon, then CITY may make a partial Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

116

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
progress payment based upon percentage completion of the partially completed deliverables and diligent progress but taking into account any adverse impacts upon CITY. CITY shall not be liable for, and CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to, any payment for Services performed before this Agreement' s execution.

4. Additional Services. In the event CITY desires the performance of additional services not otherwise included within the services described in Exhibit A, such services shall be authorized in advance of the performance thereof by the City Manager ( for contracts less than $ 50,000) or City Council ( for contracts $ 50,000 or more) by motion duly made and carried. Such amendment to this Agreement shall include a description of the services to be performed thereunder, the maximum compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses payable therefor, the time of performance thereof, and such other matters as the parties deem appropriate for the accomplishment of such services. Except to the extent modified by written amendment, all other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed incorporated in each such amendment.

5. Records. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain accurate records of all time expended and costs and expenses incurred relating to services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. Said records shall be available to CITY for review and copying during regular business hours at CONSULTANT’ s place of business or as otherwise agreed upon by the parties.

6. Authorization. This Agreement becomes effective when endorsed by both parties in the space provided below.

7. Reliance on Professional Skill of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT represents that it has the necessary professional skills to perform the services required and the CITY shall rely on such skills of the CONSULTANT to do and perform the work. In performing services hereunder CONSULTANT shall adhere to the standards generally prevailing for the performance of expert consulting services similar to those to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder.

CONSULTANT represents that it has reviewed Exhibit A and that in its professional judgment the Services to be performed under this Agreement can be performed for a fee within the maximum amount set forth in the Compensation Schedule established in Exhibit A and within the times specified for each individual Project.

CONSULTANT represents that it possesses all necessary training, licenses and permits to perform the Services and that its performance of the Services will conform to the standards of practice of a professional having experience Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

117

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
and expertise in performing professional services of like nature and complexity of the Services working on similar, successfully completed projects.

The granting of any progress payment by CITY, or the receipt thereof by CONSULTANT, or any inspection, review, approval or oral statement by any representative of CITY or any other governmental entity, shall in no way waive or limit the obligations in this Paragraph 7 or lessen the liability of CONSULTANT for unsatisfactory Services, including but not limited to cases where the defective or below standard Services may not have been apparent or detected at the time of such payment, inspection, review or approval.

8. Documents. All documents, plans, drawings, renderings, and other papers, or copies thereof, as finally rendered, prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall, upon preparation and delivery to CITY, become the property of CITY.

9. Relationship of Parties. CONSULTANT is an independent Contractor and does not act as City’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. CONSULTANT is not entitled to any benefits that CITY provides to CITY employees, including, without limitation, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within this Agreement regarding direction apply to and concern the result of the CONSULTANT’ s provision of Services, not the means, methods, or scheduling of the CONSULTANT’ s work. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Services under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by any governmental entity and shall pay all other taxes not specifically ident ified in this Agreement as CITY’s responsibility.

10. Schedule. CONSULTANT shall adhere to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A; provided, that CITY shall grant reasonable extensions of time for the performance of such services occasioned by governmental reviews of CONSULTANT’ s work product or other unavoidable delays; provided, further, that such unavoidable delay shall not include strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, or other labor disturbances conducted by, or on behalf of, CONSULTANT’ s officers or employees.

CONSULTANT acknowledges the importance to CITY of CITY’s Project schedule and agrees to put forth its best professional efforts to perform its services under this Agreement in a manner consistent with that schedule.

11. Indemnity. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and save harmless CITY and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

118

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
employees, directors, volunteers and agents, from and against any and all claims, suits, actions liability, loss, damage, expense, injury ( including, without limitation, economic harm, injury to or death of any person, including an employee of CONSULTANT or its Subconsultants), cost ( including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation) of every nature, kind or description, at law or equity, which may be brought against, or suffered or sustained by, City of Foster City or Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees, directors, volunteers or agents that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to any negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, any Subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed or retained by them, or anyone that they control. In the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the CONSULTANT shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs.

The duty of CONSULTANT to indemnify and save harmless, as set forth herein, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to require CONSULTANT to indemnify City of Foster City and Estero Municipal Improvement District, its Council, boards, commissions, officers, employees and agents against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code.

CONSULTANT’ s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law.

The defense and indemnification obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained within this Agreement.

12. Insurance. Prior to execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY Certificates of Insurance showing satisfactory proof that it maintains the insurance required by this Contract as set forth in EXHIBIT C, Insurance, which are attached and made a part of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall maintain all required insurance throughout the term of this Agreement and as otherwise provided in EXHIBIT C. In the event CONSULTANT fails to maintain any required insurance, and notwithstanding Paragraph 3 above, CITY may ( but is not obligated to) purchase such insurance and deduct or retain premium amounts from any sums due CONSULTANT under this Agreement ( or CONSULTANT shall promptly reimburse CITY for such expense).

CONSULTANT shall maintain insurance as required by this Agreement to the fullest amount allowed by law and shall maintain insurance for a minimum of five ( 5) years following completion of this project or service. In Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

119

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
the event CONSULTANT fails to obtain or maintain completed operations coverage as required by this Agreement, the CITY at its sole discretion may purchase the coverage required and the cost will be paid by CONSULTANT.

13. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. CONSULTANT certifies that he is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and CONSULTANT certifies that he will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this agreement.

14. NON- DISCRIMINATION. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and the employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:
employment, advancement, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall at all times be in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Americans With Disabilities Act ( Public Law 101- 336) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non- discrimination clause.

15. Notice. All notices required by this Agreement shall be given to the CITY and CONSULTANT in writing, by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY: City of Foster City
610 Foster City Boulevard
Foster City, CA 94404- 2299
Attention: Priscilla Schaus
CONSULTANT: 4Leaf Inc.
2126 Rheem Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
kduggan@4leafinc. com
Attention: Kevin J. Duggan

16. Non- Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable either in whole or in part.

17. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by both parties.

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

120

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

18. Validity. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.

19. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in the County of San Mateo, California. The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Any suit or action initiated by either party shall be brought in the County of San Mateo, California unless the parties agree otherwise in a written amendment to this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto to enforce any provision of the Agreement, the unsuccessful party will pay the reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation of the successful party.

20. Mediation. Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, the parties shall meet in mediation and attempt to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator. Neither party shall be permitted to file legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated resolution. The costs of the mediator, if any, shall be paid equally by the parties. If a mediated settlement is reached neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party for purposes of the settlement and each party shall bear its own legal costs.

21. Conflict of Interest. CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it presently has no interest, and shall not have any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of work and services required under this Agreement. Without limitation, CONSULTANT represents to and agrees with CITY that CONSULTANT has disclosed any potential conflict of interest, and will have no future conflict of interest, in providing CITY services hereunder, including but not limited to, any interest financial, share ownership, shared management, shared directors, or reporting responsibilities) CONSULTANT may presently have, or will have in the future, with respect to any other person or entity ( including but not limited to potential suppliers, vendors, consultants, contractors, or regulatory agency) which may have an interest in the subject matter of the Services.

22. Liability of CITY.

Except as provided in Exhibit A, Services to be Provided by CONSULTANT and Exhibit C, Insurance, CITY' s obligations under this Agreement shall be limited to the payment of the compensation provided for in Paragraphs 1, 3, and 4 of this Agreement,
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall CITY be liable, regardless of whether any claim is based on contract, tort or otherwise, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages, Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

121

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
lost profits or revenue, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the Services, or the Project.

CITY shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by CONSULTANT, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to CONSULTANT by CITY. The acceptance or use of such equipment by CONSULTANT or any of its employees shall be construed to mean that CONSULTANT accepts full responsibility for and shall exonerate, indemnify, defend and save harmless CITY from and against any and all claims for any damage or injury of any type, including attorneys' fees, arising from the use, misuse or failure of such equipment, whether such damage be to the CONSULTANT, its employees, CITY employees or third parties, or to property belonging to any of the above.

Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any right or remedy, whether in equity or at law, which CITY or CONSULTANT may have under this Agreement or any applicable law. All rights and remedies of CITY or CONSULTANT, whether under this Agreement or other applicable law, shall be cumulative.

23. Waiver of Default. Waiver of any default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided below.

24. Force Majeure. Except for defaults of subconsultants at any tier, CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the Agreement arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including without limitation failure to reasonably mitigate any adverse impacts ( Force Majeure). Force Majeure events include the following:

Acts of God, fires, floods, earthquake, other natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics ( other than COVID- 19 or variants), abnormal weather conditions beyond the parameters otherwise set forth in this Article, nuclear accidents, strikes, lockouts, freight embargos, interruptions in service by a regulated utility, or governmental statutes or regulations enacted or imposed after the fact ( together, “ force majeure events ”).

Any Force Majeure event with a duration in excess of 30 days entitles either party to terminate this Agreement with written notice to the other party, without further penalty or compensation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

122

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Exhibits A, B, C, and D comprises the entire Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first above written by their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf.

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
Dated: _________________________________ Patrick Sullivan, Mayor
ATTEST:

Dated: ________________________________ Priscilla Schaus, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Dated:

Benjamin Stock, City Attorney

CONSULTANT
Dated:

Kevin J. Duggan, President, 4LEAF
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198 7/ 25/ 2024 | 10: 20 AM PDT
7/ 25/ 2024 | 12: 27 PM PDT
7/ 25/ 2024 | 8: 24 PM PDT
7/ 26/ 2024 | 10: 24 AM PDT

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

123

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

EXHIBIT A
Services shall commence on July 16, 2024 and terminate on June 30, 2026 unless otherwise extended in a written agreement by the parties.

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

124

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

125

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

126

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

127

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

128

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

129

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

130

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

EXHIBIT B

FEE SCHEDULE
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

131

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

132

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Plan Review Cost Structure:

Plan Review percentage: 65% paid by directly by the applicant to 4LEAF, Inc.

Structural Only Review percentage: 35% paid directly by the applicant to 4LEAF, Inc.

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

133

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE FORMS
CONSULTANT shall provide, in addition to the Certificates of Insurance, original Endorsement affecting the coverages specified in herein on the attached form . No substitute form will be accepted.

This is an Exhibit to, and made a part of and incorporated by reference to the Agreement dated July 16, 2024, by and between 4LEAF, Inc., hereinafter referred to as " Consultant”, and the City of Foster City, hereinafter referred to as " City", providing for professional services.

1. Consultant' s Duty to Show Proof of Insurance. Consultant, in order to protect City and its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees against all claims and liability for death, injury, loss and damage as a result of Consultant' s acts, errors, or omissions in connection with the pe rformance of Consultant' s obligations, as required in this Agreement, shall secure and maintain insurance as described below. Consultant shall not perform any work under this Agreement until Consultant has obtained all insurance required under this section and the required certificates of insurance and all required endorsements have been filed with the City' s authorized insurance representative, insurance Tracking Services Inc. ( ITS). Receipt of evidence of insurance that does not comply with all applicab le insurance requirements shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements set forth herein. The required documents must be signed by the authorized representative of the insurance company shown on the certificate. Upon request, Consultant shall supply proof that such person is an authorized representative thereof, and is authorized to bind the named underwriter( s) and their company to the coverage, limits and termination provisions shown thereon, Consultant shall promptly deliver to ITS a certificate of insurance, and all required endorsements, with respect to each renewal policy, as necessary to demonstrate the maintenance of the required insurance coverage for the term specified herein. Such certificates and endorsements shall be delivered to ITS prior to the expiration date of any policy and bear a notation evidencing payment of the premium thereof if so requested. Consultant shall immediately pay any deductibles and self- insured retentions under all required insurance policies upon the sub mission of any claim by Consultant or City as an additional insured.

1.1 Insurance Requirements
Commercial General Liability Insurance
Commercial General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Contractual Liability Insurance ( specifically concerning the indemnity provisions of this Agreement with the City ), Products- Completed Operations Hazard, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy arising out of professional services rendered hereunder, Personal Injury ( including bodily injury and death), and Property Damage for liability arising out of Consultant' s performance of services under this Agreement. The Comm ercial General Liability insurance shall contain no exclusions or limitation for independent contractors working on the behalf of the named insured. Consultant shall maintain the Products- Completed Operations Hazard coverage for the longest period allowed by law following termination of this Agreement. The amount of said insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be the policy limits, which shall be at least one million dollars ($ 1,000, 000) each occurrence and two million dollars 2,000, 000) aggregate.

Please note, the City will require a separate additional insured endorsement for the Commercial General Liability policy, listing the “ City of Foster City, its Council members, officials, agents, officers, and employees”.

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

134

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
Business Automobile Liability Insurance
Automobile Liability Insurance against claims of Personal Injury ( including bodily injury and death) and Property Damage covering any vehicle and/ or all owned, leased, hired and non- owned vehicles used in the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall be at least two million dollars ($ 2,000, 000) each occurrence.

Workers' Compensation Insurance
Consultant shall submit written proof that Consultant is insured against liability for workers' compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code. Consultant shall require any Subconsultants to provide workers' compensation for all of the Subconsultants' employees, unless the Subconsultants' employees are covered by the insurance afforded by Consultant. If any class of employees engaged in work or services performed under this Agreement is not covered by California Labor Code section 3700, Consultant shall provide and/ or require each Subconsultant to provide adequate insurance for the coverage of employees not otherwise covered. Consultant shall also maintain employer' s liability insurance with limits of one million dollars ($ 1,000, 000) for bodily injury or disease.

Professional Liability Insurance
Professional Liability ( Errors and Omissions) Insurance, for liability arising out of, or in connection with, all negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with services to be provided under this Agreement, with no exclusion for claims of one insured against another insured, with coverage equal to the policy limits, which shall not be less than two million dollars ($ 2,000, 000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($ 2,000, 000) aggregate.

1.2 Self- Insured Retention
Any self- insured retentions in excess of $ 100, 000 must be declared on the Certificate of insurance or other documentation provided to City and must be approved by the City Risk Manager.

1.3 Claims- Made Basis Coverage
If any of the insurance coverages required under this Agreement is written on a claims- made basis, Consultant, at Consultant' s option, shall either ( i) maintain said coverage for at least five ( 5) years following the termination of this Agreement with coverage extending back to the effective date of this Agreement; ( ii) purchase an extended reporting period of not less than five ( 5) years following the termination of this Agreement; or (iii) acquire a full prior acts provis ion on any renewal or replacement policy.

2. City as Additional Insured
On Consultant' s Commercial General Liability and Automobile policies, the City, its Council members, officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insured' s, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured. Any endorsement shall be provided using one of the following three options: ( i) on ISO form CG 20 10 1 1 85; or ( ii) on ISO form CG 20 37 10 01 plus either ISO form CG 20 10 10 01 or CG 20 33 10 01; or ( iii) on such other forms which provide coverage at least equal to or better than form CG 20 10 1 1 85.

3. Insurance terms and conditions:

3.1 Cancellation of Insurance
The above stated insurance coverages required to be maintained by Consultant shall be maintained until the completion of all of Consultant' s obligations under this Agreement except as otherwise indicated herein. Each insurance policy supplied by Consultant shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after ten ( 10) days written notice by Consultant in the case of non- payment of premiums, or thirty ( 30) days Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

135

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
written notice in all other cases. This notice requirement does not waive the insurance requirements stated herein.

Consultant shall immediately obtain replacement coverage for any insurance policy that is terminated, canceled, non- renewed, or whose policy limits have been exhausted or upon insolvency of the insurer that issued the policy.

3.2 All insurance shall be issued by a company or companies admitted to do business in California and listed in the current " Best' s Key Rating Guide" publication with a minimum rating of A -; VII Any exception to these requirements must be approved by the City Risk Manager.

3.3 If Consultant is, or becomes during the term of this Agreement, self -insured or a member of a self- insurance pool, Consultant shall provide coverage equivalent to the insurance coverages and endorsements required above.

The City will not accept such coverage unless the City determines, in its sole discretion and by written acceptance, that the coverage proposed to be provided by Consultant is equivalent to the above- required coverages.

3.4 For any claims related to the Agreement, the Consultant’ s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City , its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’ s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3.5 Insurance coverages in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Consultant for any liability, whether within, outside, or in excess of such coverage, and regardless of solvency or insolvency of the insurer that issues the coverage; nor shall it preclude the City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provision of this Agreement or otherwi se in law.

3.6 Failure by Consultant to maintain all such insurance in effect at all times required by this Agreement shall be a material breach of this Agreement by Consultant. City , at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from Consultant resulting from said breach. Alternatively, City may purchase such required insurance coverage, and without further notice to Consultant, City shall deduct from sums due to Consultant any premiums and associated costs advanced or paid by City for such insurance. If the balance of monies obligated to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are insufficient to reimburse City for the premiums and any associated costs, Consultant agrees to reimburse City for the premiums and pay for all costs associated with the purchase of said insurance. Any failure by City to take this alternative action shall not relieve Consultant of its obligation to obtain and maintain the insurance coverages required by this Agreement.

3.7 Should any of the required insurance ( other than errors and omissions insurance) be provided under a form of coverage that includes a general annual aggregate limit or provides that claims investigation or legal defenses costs be included in such general aggregate limit, such general annual aggregate limit shall be double the occurrence or claims limit specified above.

3.8 City may ( but is under no obligation to) secure project- specific insurance, wrap- up insurance, or administer an owner controlled insurance program (" OCIP"), in which case Consultant and its subconsultants shall communicate this fact to their insurance carriers and request that the risk of this project be excluded from their practice policies.

Consultant' s fees under this Agreement ( and the fee of its subconsultants under sub consultant agreements) shall be reduced by the amount of insurance premiums that may be avoided by Consultant and its subconsultants by virtue of the City' s obtaining the project- specific insurance, wrap- up insurance or administering an OCIP, and the exclusion of this project from coverage of Consultant' s and subconsultants policies. Construction Manager and its subconsultants shall afford City access to their books and records and cooperate with City in verifying the amount of savings realized.

ATTACHED

1. Insurance Coverage Form

EXHIBIT C
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

136

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
This INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM modifies or documents insurance provided under the following:

Named Insured: Effective Work Date( s):

Description of Work/ Locations/ Vehicles:

ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Foster City/ Estero Municipal Improvement District ( CITY) 610 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, CA 94404
Attention: _________________________________
Contract Administrator
Endorsement and Certificates of Insurance Required
The Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included asinsureds with regard to damagesand defenseof claims arising from: ( Check all that apply)
Insurer Policy
No.

General Liability: ( a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, ( b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, ( c) premises owned, leased occupied or used by the Named Insured, and/ or ( d) permits issued for operations performed by the Named Insured. { Note:

MEETS OR EXCEEDS ISO Form # CG 20 10 11 85}
Auto Liability: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Other:

Certificates of Insurance Required ( no endorsement needed) ( Check all that apply) Insurer Policy No.

Workers Compensation: work performed by employees of the Named Insured while those employees are engaged in work under the simultaneous directions and control of the Named Insured and the Additional Insured.

Professional Liability:

PRIMARY/ NON- CONTRIBUTORY: This insurance is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of Additional Insureds.

SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST: The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limit of liability.

PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED' S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS: Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insured, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty ( 30) days' prior written notice ( ten ( 10) days if canceled due to non -payment) by regular mail return receipt requested has been given to the Additional Insured. Such notice shall be addressed as shown above.

WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: The insurer( s) named above agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the CITY.

Nothing herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any provision or condition of the Policy other than as above stated.

SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER I, ______________________________________________________________( print/ type name), warrant that I have authority to bind the above- named insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ( original signature required) Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

137

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
ORGANIZATION: TITLE:

ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE: ( ) DATE ISSUED:

Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

138

4887- 9204- 2585 v1

EXHIBIT D
COVID- 19 AMENDMENT/ ATTACHMENT
Consulting Agreement Form)
This COVID- 19 Amendment/ Attachment amends the Agreement between (“ City”) and 4 LEAF Consultant”) dated July 18, 2023.

1. Definitions
A. The 2019 novel coronavirus and the disease it causes are collectively referred to herein as COVID- 19”.

B. A “COVID- 19 Condition” is something attributable to COVID- 19 not caused by the Consultant which for purposes herein includes all subconsultants) and beyond its reasonable control including but not limited to COVID- 19 Proclamations and supply chain disruptions due to COVID- 19, and other circumstances concerning COVID- 19 not caused by the Consultant and which are beyond its reasonable control.

C. A “COVID- 19 Proclamation” includes but is not limited to orders, directives and guidance concerning COVID- 19 that have been issued, and which may be issued from time to time, by public agencies or regulatory bodies, the CDC or OSHA or Cal/ OSHA, including without limitation the Cal/ OSHA COVID- 19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards. Consultant acknowledges that those orders, directives and guidance may require the Project to shut down or otherwise increase the Consultant’ s cost or time of performance by calling for things such as social distancing and the use of personal protective equipment. In the event of conflicting COVID- 19 Proclamations, the Consultant shall follow the most applicable, restrictive and newest COVID -19 Proclamations.

D. An “Unknown COVID- 19 Condition” is a COVID- 19 Condition the Consultant did not know about, and reasonably should not have known about, as of the date the Consultant submitted its proposal. The requirements contained in COVID- 19 Proclamations issued before submission of a proposal are not Unknown COVID- 19 Conditions, and the Consultant will be deemed to have knowledge of those requirements.

E. An “Unknown COVID- 19 Cost” is a cost that: ( i) is solely attributable to an Unknown COVID- 19 Condition; ( ii) is reasonable and unavoidable under the circumstances; ( iii) is not the result of the Consultant’ s failure to comply with the contract documents or a COVID -19 Proclamation; and ( iv) is not the result of a subconsultants failure to comply with a COVID- 19 Proclamation in connection with the performance of the Services.

2. COVID- 19 Conditions and Proposal. Consultant is expected to know and is deemed to have known about COVID- 19 Conditions when it submits its proposal, and COVID- 19 Conditions must be accounted for in the Consultant’s price and schedule. In order to be entitled to any relief from a COVID- 19 Condition, the Consultant must demonstrate that the issue, cost or delay is due to an Unknown COVID- 19 Condition.

3. Compliance with COVID- 19 Proclamations.

A. Consultant shall comply with COVID- 19 Proclamations in the performance of the Services, irrespective of when the COVID- 19 Proclamations are issued, and as they pertains to performance of Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

139

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
the Services. The cost of such compliance is non- compensable, except as otherwise expressly stated herein.

B. Consultant is responsible to ensure that its subconsultants and suppliers comply with COVID - 19 Proclamations at all times in connection with the performance of their Services.

4. Delay. The Consultant is entitled to a reasonable time extension for an Unknown COVID- 19 Condition. Such time extension is non- compensable.

5. City Directed Suspension. The City may suspend Services due to COVID- 19 health concerns, even though the Consultant may be allowed to proceed with the Services based on COVID- 19 Proclamations. The City may suspend the Services for its convenience. The Consultant is entitled to a time extension for a City Directed Suspension, and the contract amount will be equitably adjusted if and to the extent Consultant incurs increased costs that are Unknown COVID- 19 Costs.

6. Compensation for COVID- 19 Costs. City will reimburse the Consultant for Unknown COVID- 19 Costs that are not included in the schedule of values.

7. Safe Work Practices. Consultant shall implement safe work practices recommended by CDC or OSHA or Cal/ OSHA, which may include, inter alia, screening all employees, subconsultants, or others worker( s)”) at all locations where Services are performed for signs and symptoms of COVID -19; adopting staggered work schedules, e.g., providing alternating workdays or extra shifts, to reduce the total number of employees on a site at any given time and to ensure physical distancing; identifying choke points where workers are forced to stand together, such as hallways and elevators, ingress and egress points, break areas, and buses, and implement policies to maintain social distancing; coordinating deliveries in line with the employer' s minimal contact and cleaning protocols; and instituting a rigorous housekeeping program to reduce dust levels at all exterior locations. Consultant remains fully responsible for following and complying with changes to recommended safe work practices from time to time.

8. Monitoring and Reporting. City may require the Consultant to actively monitor the health of its workers through temperature checks and questionnaires of major COVID- 19 symptoms, including but not limited to cough, fever above 100. 4 degrees Fahrenheit and shortness of breath. Consultant shall immediately report to City any outbreaks of COVID- 19 among its workers. The Consultant shall not knowingly allow any worker who has tested positive with COVID- 19 to enter a City building. In the event of an outbreak or an exposure to COVID- 19, the City may impose appropriate mitigation strategies which may be in consultation with the public health officer.

9. Conflicts. In the event of an inconsistency between this COVID- 19 Amendment and the Agreement, this Addendum shall control.

Signatures on Next Page]
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

140

4887- 9204- 2585 v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Covid- 19 Amendment as of the date set forth above.

CONSULTANT: CITY:

Signature Signature
Kevin J. Duggan Patrick Sullivan
President Mayor
Docusign Envelope ID: 1C8700EA- 99CC- 44D6- 8C00- A5CDC53B3198

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

141

ORIGINAL

CITY OF FOSTER CITY

CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1)

DATE: April 7, 2025 ACCOUNT NO. 001-0820-419-4251

PROJECT NAME: On-Call Building Services

TO: 4Leaf, Inc.

CHANGE REQUESTED BY: 4Leaf, Inc. and City of Foster City

Based on mutual agreement, 4Leaf, Inc. and City of Foster City agree to amend the original Agreement dated July 16, 2024 (“Agreement”) pursuant to:

Section 2 of the Agreement to add additional services amount, which are identified as follows:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 150,000

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) $ 75,000

REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 225,000

Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
4Leaf, Inc. have given careful consideration to the work proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, to provide all equipment, furnish all materials except as may otherwise be noted above, and to perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and to accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

SUBMITTED BY:

BECKI HANAN DATE

PROJECT MANAGER

ACCEPTED BY:

KEVIN J. DUGGAN, PRESIDENT DATE
4LEAF, INC.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC86FC-4A67-44C8-987D-7C70A8192519 4/14/2025 | 10:14 AM PDT
4/14/2025 | 10:42 AM PDT

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

142

APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

SOFIA MANGALAM DATE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

APPROVED FOR CITY:

STACY JIMENEZ DATE
MAYOR

ATTEST:

BY:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ___________________________________
BENJAMIN L. STOCK, CITY ATTORNEY
Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC86FC-4A67-44C8-987D-7C70A8192519 4/14/2025 | 12:35 PM PDT
4/14/2025 | 12:35 PM PDT

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

143

CITY OF FOSTER CITY

CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2)

DATE: JULY 21, 2025

ACCOUNT NUMBER: 001-0820-419-4251

PROJECT NAME: ON-CALL BUILDING SERVICES

TO: 4LEAF, INC.

CHANGE REQUESTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Based on mutual agreement, 4Leaf, Inc. and City of Foster City agree to amend the original Agreement dated July 16, 2024 (“Agreement”) pursuant to: Section 2 of the Agreement to add additional services amount, which are identified as follows:

ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT $150,000

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. ONE (1) $ 75,000

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2) $ 100,000

REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 325,000

The increased Agreement maximum is necessary to continue using 4Leaf for on -call building services, given their familiarity with ongoing projects and consistent availability.

Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and provisions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

[Signatures on Next Page]

Docusign Envelope ID: FD7D03B1-9C91-45BF-91AE-D300D6C2E837

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

144

SUBMITTED BY: ____________________________________________

BECKI HANAN DATE

SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST

ACCEPTED BY: _____________________________________________ KEVIN J. DUGGAN, PRESIDENT DATE
4LEAF, INC.

APPROVED FOR CITY: _____________________________________________

STACY JIMENEZ DATE
MAYOR

ATTEST:

BY:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK DATE
BY: KATHERINE ESTRADA, DEPUTY CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

BENJAMIN L. STOCK, CITY ATTORNEY DATE

Docusign Envelope ID: FD7D03B1-9C91-45BF-91AE-D300D6C2E837 7/23/2025 | 8:24 AM PDT
7/23/2025 | 8:37 AM PDT
7/23/2025 | 8:52 AM PDT
7/25/2025 | 11:51 AM PDT
7/28/2025 | 11:30 AM PDT

6.4 Attachment 3 - 4LEAF Agreement and Contract Amendments

145

DATE: November 3, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director
Nori Jabba, Housing and Sustainability Manager
Vanessa Brannon, Senior Management Analyst
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND CONSERVATION

ELEMENT UPDATES

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1.Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) repealing the 2009 Parks and Open Space Element and amending the General Plan by adopting the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and find that the adoption of the Element is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (“general rule” or “common sense”).

2. Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 2) repealing the existing 2003 Conservation Element and amending the General Plan by adopting the updated 2025 Conservation Element and finding that the adoption of the Element is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (“general rule” or “common sense”).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
California law requires that General Plans be updated periodically. Except for the Housing Element, which must be updated every eight years, State law does not establish a specific schedule for updating other General Plan elements. The State Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), formerly known as the Office of Planning and Research (OPR),

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

146

recommends that jurisdictions complete a comprehensive General Plan update every 10 to 15 years to reflect changes in community values, economic conditions, and emerging issues.

In the year 2021-2022 state legislative session, Senate Bill (SB) 1425 was passed and signed into law. This bill requires that the Open Space Element of the General Plan be updated by January 1, 2026, with expanded requirements, including:
(1) Access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice element or environmental justice policies in the general plan, as applicable. (2) Climate resilience and other co-benefits of open space, correlated with the safety element.
(3) Rewilding opportunities, correlated with the land use element.

The other applicable bill is Assembly Bill (AB) 1889, which was signed into law on September 10, 2024, and requires the Conservation Element of the General Plan to analyze the effects of development on wildlife movement and habitat connectivity.

Beginning with the next General Plan update, which occurs on or after January 1, 2028, jurisdictions must identify and evaluate connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscapes within their boundaries. They must also analyze existing and planned wildlife passage features and assess the impacts and barriers caused by development on wildlife and habitat connectivity.

To ensure compliance with SB 1425 and AB 1889, the City has prepared updates to the Parks and Open Space Element and the Conservation Element of its General Plan. The final drafts of two (2) Elements were presented to the Planning Commission on October 2, 2025, in a public hearing. At the meeting, the Planning Commission voted 4-0-0-1 (1- absent) approving Resolution P-12-25 (Attachment 7) recommending that the City Council repeal the 2009 Parks and Open Space Element and amend the General Plan by adopting 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and Resolution P-13-25 (Attachment 8) recommending that the City Council repeal the 2003 Conservation Element and amend the General Plan by adopting 2025 Conservation Element and finding the adoption of the Elements is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(B)(3).

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions (Attachments 1 and 2), which include the following actions: (1) repealing the 2009 Parks and Open Space Element and adopting the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element; (2) repealing the 2003 Conservation Element and adopting the 2025 Conservation Element; and making corresponding CEQA findings.

Public Notice
California Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.4 requires that before a legislative body takes action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

147

shall refer the proposed action to a number of entities or conduct consultations with California Native American tribes that are on the contact list. The City has referred the Parks and Open Space Element and the Conservation Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission, as well as to other listed entities, before the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. No California Native American Tribe has requested consultation.

ANALYSIS
Since the start of the update process, there have been three (3) Joint Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Committee Study Sessions and three (3) City Council meetings to provide an update and seek input on the preparation of the administrative drafts of the Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element.

At the last Joint Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Committee Study Session and the City Council meeting, staff presented the administrative draft of the two (2) Elements. The administrative drafts were also made available for public review from August 8 through September 2, 2025.

Comments received from the public, City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Committee were incorporated into the final draft of each Element where appropriate. The majority of comments received were directed at the Parks and Open Space Element. Some comments relating to park management and recreation facilities that were more relevant to the Parks Master Plan were forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Department and the project consultant WRT.

A complete list of all comments and responses is included in Attachment 6 – Engagement Results Summary. Table 1 outlines the edits that were made to the final draft of the Parks and Open Space Element
Table 1: List of major comments and applicable edits to the Parks and Open Space Element.

Comment Summary Comment
Response
Page Number
(Attachment 3)
Community The Lagoon is described as both a
major recreational and ecological
water body, which seems
inconsistent, and suggests clarifying
whether it is primarily recreational or
ecological.

The requested edits
have been
incorporated.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 7 ends

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

148

The lagoon is approximately 213
acres in size, to help in planning.

Recommends referencing surface
area as well as ecological function.

The requested
information
regarding the volume
of water held by the
lagoon has been
added.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 7 ends

Requests that the City correct the
term “Canadian geese” to “Canada
geese,” and clarify that avian DNA,
rather than Canada goose DNA
alone, has been identified as
impacting water quality.
“Canadian geese”
has been corrected
to “Canada geese,”
and the statement
regarding poor
lagoon water quality
has been corrected
to more accurately
represent the cause
of poor water quality.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 7 ends

Raised concerns about ensuring the
Parks and Open Space Element
does not conflict too strongly with
the Housing Element. Referring to
POS-F under the Implementation
Program, which states that as Foster
City grows, the City will strive to
maintain its existing park acreage
level of service (LOS) of 3.2 acres
per thousand residents. Provided
that the surrounding cities have an
LOS of 2.8 acres, and in order to
experience the expected growth
between now and 2040, an
additional 12.9 acres of park space
would need to be included in order
to maintain the 3.2 LOS. It was
suggested either remaining at the
current acreage or slightly below to
ensure that the city has room for the
Housing Element obligations.

The Parks and Open
Space Element was
adjusted to maintain
existing parkland
and evaluate
potential LOS in the
future. Language
was adjusted to
avoid potential
conflict with Housing
Element objectives,
emphasizing
balance and
flexibility.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends
Page 34 ends

Planning
Commission
Asked if the acreage requirement
should be defined now. Referring to
the fact that the City is moving
towards more objective standards,
and having this conflict could create
unnecessary challenges for potential
developers.

The Parks and Open
Space Element was
adjusted to maintain
existing parkland
and evaluate
potential LOS in the
future. Language
was adjusted to
avoid potential
conflict with Housing
Element objectives,
emphasizing
balance and
flexibility.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends
Page 34 ends

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

149

Asked about the calculation behind

12.9 acres, if the population is
expected to go up by 2040, and
suggested setting the goal at the
current acres per thousand
residents. Recommendation for
setting it at 2.8 and cautioned that

3.2 might not be sustainable.

Language around
park LOS has been
updated in the
Element to maintain
existing acreage and
consider the
appropriate metric at
a future time.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends
Page 34 ends

Stated that the preferred approach is
to define the numbers to reach the
RHNA goals while still meeting the
needs of the community.

The Parks and Open
Space Element was
adjusted to maintain
existing parkland
and evaluate
potential LOS in the
future. Language
was adjusted to
avoid potential
conflict with Housing
Element objectives,
emphasizing
balance and
flexibility.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends

Suggested that there be looser
language used in the elements.

Asked if the dredging refers to the
dumping of what has been dredged.

Language was
adjusted for flexibility
to avoid prescriptive
standards.

References to
dredging were
clarified to ensure
accuracy of
terminology
regarding sediment
removal and
management.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends

Asked if they are looking to adopt a
formal and measurable standard.

The Parks and Open
Space Element
clarifies that
measurable
standards may be
established through
future planning
processes.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 34 ends

Program POS-g)
Parks and Rec
Committee
Member
The attractiveness of the parks
should be discussed alongside the
technical components of the
element.

Narrative language
was added to
emphasize that
parks provide both
technical functions
(e.g., flood
protection, habitat
value) and
community benefits
Parks and Open
Space Element,
Pages 6 and 21

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

150

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

151

such as beauty,
identity, and quality
of life.

Referring to the issue raised by the
Planning Commission regarding the
LOS requirement of 3.2 acres per
thousand residents, or 12.9
additional acres are needed by
2040. Will this requirement interfere
with housing development?
The Parks and Open
Space Element was
adjusted to maintain
existing parkland
and evaluate
potential LOS in the
future. Language
was adjusted to
avoid potential
conflict with Housing
Element objectives,
emphasizing
balance and
flexibility.

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 13 ends
Page 34 ends

Noted missing elements from some
of the entries in the parks inventory
(Table 1) and requested Parks &
Rec review the table before
finalizing the report.

Table 1 was
reviewed and refined
for accuracy and
updated to better
reflect the major
facilities at each
park.

Parks and Open
Space Element,
Pages 8-9
Recommended revising strong
wording in policies (e.g., “ensure”) to
alternatives like “promote”, “create”,
or “aspire to.”
Strong prescriptive
wording was revised
to alternatives such
as “promote” or
“support,” consistent
with the Council’s
direction.

Parks and Open
Space Element,
Pages 31-36
City Council
Found implementation programs
starting on Page 46 a bit vague and
requested clarification on definitions
of long-term, mid-term, and short-
term to be added to the Elements.

Also, would like to see some of the
long-term goals done sooner.

Language added for
clarification: short-
term (1-5 years),
mid-term (6-10
years), and long-
term (10+ years).

Parks and Open
Space Element,

Page 36 ends

In addition to the specific edits identified through public and Council/Commission/Committee feedback, staff made further corrections to acreage data, refined technical descriptions, and improved clarity and readability throughout both Elements. A list of staff edits is provided in Attachment 5. Redline versions of both Elements are also included for reference:
Parks and Open Space Element – redline version – Attachment 3 Conservation Element – redline version – Attachment 4

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

152

Draft 2025 Parks and Open Space Element (Attachment 1, Exhibit A – P_OS Element Final)
The draft 2025 Parks and Open Space Element fulfills State requirements for an Open Space Element and establishes Foster City’s vision for how recreational and natural areas, including parks, open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enhanced. The Element recognizes parks and open space as essential to community health, social connection, and environmental stewardship, while also contributing to climate resilience by addressing flooding, extreme heat, and other natural hazards.

The Element is organized into four (4) main sections:

1. Requirements – Summarizes State legal requirements, regional policies, and local plans.

2. Background – Provides a systemwide assessment of existing park and open space conditions, including level of service, access, connectivity, usage, and amenities, along with detailed park site evaluations and community engagement results.

3. Goals and Policies – Establishes seven (7) goals and 22 policies focused on park system planning, programming, and events, operations and maintenance, open space values, and climate resiliency.

4. Implementation Programs – Outlines 29 programs identifying lead and supporting departments and timelines for implementation.

Attachment 1, Exhibit B, provides a legislative consistency checklist confirming that the Parks and Open Space Element Update complies with State planning law and recent legislation, including SB 1425 and AB 1889. California Government Code Section 65302(e) requires cities to adopt an open space element that addresses the preservation and enhancement of open space lands, equitable access to recreation, and long-term community needs. The analysis confirms that the updated Element meets these requirements and incorporates all recent mandates. The checklist describes how the City’s goals, policies, and implementation programs align with statutory provisions.

Overall, the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element provides a comprehensive framework for guiding the long-term stewardship of Foster City’s parks and open spaces. It promotes equitable access to recreation, enhances quality of life, and supports environmental sustainability and community resilience. The Parks and Open Space Element is a complementary plan to the Parks Master Plan.

Draft 2025 Conservation Element (Attachment 2, Exhibit A – Cons Element Final) The draft 2025 Conservation Element of the General Plan fulfills State requirements and establishes Foster City’s long-term vision for conserving and managing its natural and cultural resources. The Element emphasizes environmental sustainability, community well-being, and climate resilience as key priorities for the City’s resource management. It

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

153

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

154

guides the protection and enhancement of biological habitats, the urban forest, surface and groundwater, and historic, cultural, and tribal resources, while supporting efforts to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with State mandates.

The Element is organized into four (4) primary sections:

1. Requirements – Summarizes State requirements, regional policies, and local plans.

2. Background – Provides a comprehensive assessment of Foster City’s environmental setting, including natural resources, water and air quality, energy infrastructure, and habitat areas. It also evaluates future challenges such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat, and identifies opportunities for biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and equitable access to green space.

3. Goals and Policies – Establishes nine (9) goals and 38 policies addressing biological resources, water resources, air quality, energy resources, and climate adaptation.

4. Implementation Programs – Outlines 23 specific programs to achieve the vision of the Element, identifying lead and supporting departments and timelines for implementation.

As with the Parks and Open Space Element, staff has included a legislative consistency checklist (Attachment 2, Exhibit B) to confirm alignment with State law and recent legislation. California Government Code Section 65302(d) requires cities to adopt a conservation element addressing the protection of natural resources, including water and air quality, biological resources, and energy conservation. The analysis confirms that the updated Element meets these requirements and incorporates new mandates, including AB 1889, which directs jurisdictions to consider wildlife movement and habitat connectivity.

Overall, the 2025 Conservation Element demonstrates strong consistency with State planning law while advancing Foster City’s long-term vision for environmental stewardship, climate resilience, and sustainable management of natural and cultural resources. It provides a clear and modern framework to protect the environment and support the quality of life for the community.

California Environmental Quality Act
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), also known as the “general rule” or “common sense” exemption, CEQA exempts activities that can be seen with certainty to have no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment. CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) states that “A project is exempt from CEQA if…[t]he activity is covered by a common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

155

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

156

with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.” The Updates involve the adoption of policy documents to establish the City’s vision, goals, policies, and programs for the provisioning and management of natural and recreational areas within the city, as well as the protection of natural and cultural resources. These policy documents, in and of themselves, do not include any proposed projects or development. The Updates do not propose or approve any physical development and will not result in changes to the physical environment, nor will they result in potential environmental impacts. To the extent that the Updates identify potential future projects or development, those would be analyzed if and when the City approves those projects in accordance with CEQA. The Updates meet the criteria for the common sense exemption as identified above.

FISCAL IMPACT
Implementing the various programs outlined in the Implementation Plan of the Draft Elements will have a fiscal impact. However, adopting the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and 2025 Conservation Element does not directly result in financial obligations.

The City Council will guide the implementation of these programs by giving policy direction to staff and through the annual budget process.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
City Council Operations and Improved Community Engagement Smart Planning, Development, and the Local Economy
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Parks and Open Space Resolution
Exhibit A: P_OS Element – Final Clean Version
Exhibit B: P_OS Element – Legislative Consistency Checklist Attachment 2 – Conservation Element Resolution
Exhibit A: Cons Element – Final Clean Version
Exhibit B: Cons Element – Legislative Consistency Checklist Attachment 3 – P_OS Element – Redline Version
Attachment 4 – Cons Element – Redline Version
Attachment 5 – Full List of Edits in Redlined Versions
Attachment 6 – Engagement Results Summary
Attachment 7 – Planning Commission Reso P-12-25
Attachment 8 – Planning Commission Reso P-13-25

7.1 7.1 Staff Report

157

3 9
4 4
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY REPEALING THE 2009 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE 2025 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND FINDING

THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE ELEMENT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a general plan contains the community vision for future growth, California law also requires each general plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302; and
WHEREAS, the mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety; and WHEREAS, Foster City’s Parks and Open Space Element was last adopted in September 2009; and
WHEREAS, the State Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, LCI (previously known as the Office of Planning and Research or OPR) recommends comprehensively updating a General Plan every 10-15 years to reflect changes in community values, economic conditions, and emerging issues and challenges; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1425 requires that the Open Space Element be updated by January 1, 2026, with expanded requirements including consideration of climate resilience in coordination with the Safety Element; and WHEREAS, SB 1425 also explicitly focuses on "rewilding opportunities," or creating and preserving open space networks to support biological and recreational uses; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 1889 requires the General Plan Conservation Element to consider the effect of development within the jurisdiction on the movement of wildlife and habitat connectivity; and
WHEREAS, AB 1889 requires the Conservation Element, upon the next update of one or more elements on or after January 1, 2028, to, among other things, identify and analyze connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscape areas within the jurisdiction, identify and analyze existing or planned wildlife passage features, and consider the impacts of development and the barriers caused by development to wildlife, as defined, and habitat connectivity; and

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

158

3 9
4 4
WHEREAS, to ensure compliance with SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements in a timely manner, the City of Foster City began work on updating the two (2) Elements, including the Parks and Open Space Element, and Conservation Element; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.4 require that before a legislative body takes action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency shall refer the proposed action to a number of entities or conduct consultations with California Native American tribes that are on the contact list. The City has referred the Parks and Open Space Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission; and WHEREAS, no California Native American Tribe has requested consultation; and WHEREAS, the City conducted extensive community outreach, including one (1) joint workshop, two (2) focus groups, two (2) pop-up events, a dedicated webpage, and one (1) community priorities survey and social media, e-news, emails, and notices; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2025, the City published an administrative draft of the Parks and Open Space Element and requested public comment on the draft until September 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65353, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65354, the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider this Resolution regarding the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element, reviewed the Element and all pertinent documents and exhibits, staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P-12-25, with a majority of the Planning Commission (voted 4-0-0-1 (1-absent)) recommending City Council approval of the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2025, a public hearing notice was published in the newspaper (Foster City Islander) and posted in three public places, and mailed pursuant to California Code Section 65090 for the City Council public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the draft 2025 Parks and Open Space Element, all written correspondence, verbal testimony, staff reports, and supporting documents and reports prepared.

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

159

3 9
4 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby finds that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.

2. The proposed project conforms to the provisions and standards of the General Plan in that the proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan.

3. The proposed General Plan Amendment complies with, and is required by, applicable State law.

4. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City. The amendments will ensure Foster City’s General Plan is consistent with current state law. The updated Element establishes the City’s vision, goals, policies, and implementation programs for how its recreational and natural areas, including parks, natural open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enriched.

5. The City, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has completed analysis, and the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and determined that the Updates are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the “common sense exemption” in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which applies if it can be seen with certainty that a project will not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. The Updates involve the adoption of policy documents to establish the City’s vision, goals, policies, and programs for the provisioning and management of natural and recreational areas within the city, as well as the protection of natural and cultural resources. These policy documents, in and of themselves, do not include any proposed projects or development. The Updates do not propose or approve any physical development and will not result in changes to the physical environment, nor will they result in potential environmental impacts. To the extent that the Updates do identify potential future projects or development, those would be analyzed if and when the City approves those projects in accordance with CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City, therefore, repeals the 2009 Parks and Open Space Element and adopts the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element as set forth in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference and attached hereto.

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

160

3 9
4 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a Resolution by the City Council of the City of Foster City at the Regular Meeting held on the 3rd day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________

STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

161

3 9
4 4

EXHIBIT A
Parks and Open Space Element – Final Clean Version

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

162

3 9
4 4

EXHIBIT B
Parks and Open Space Element Legislative Consistency Checklist

7.1 Attachment 1- Parks and Open Space Resolution

163

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 1
Parks and Open Space Introduction

Boardwalk along the Foster City Lagoon near Leo J. Ryan Park, a central open space known for its scenic waterfront and community gathering areas Foster City, 2025.

Purpose
The Parks and Open Space Element fulfills the State’s requirements for an Open Space Element while also establishing Foster City’s vision to how its natural and recreational areas, including parks, natural open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enriched.

The Parks and Open Space Element leverages the city’s parks and open space areas as a vital framework for community wellbeing and natural stewardship. It guides the use of parks and open spaces for recreation, social connection, and enrichment, and plays a role in building resilience to natural hazards such as flooding and extreme heat. By weaving these aspects together, the City can enhance livability for all residents and foster deeper relationships with Foster City’s natural environment.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key trends related to parks, open space, and recreation. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for parks, open space, and recreation. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

164

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 2
Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

While these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Legal Requirements
The Parks and Open Space Element of the General Plan is guided by state law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, promote ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(e) – Open Space Element Requirements
California Government Code §65302(e) requires all general plans to include an Open Space Element that addresses the long-term preservation of open space lands. This includes open space for natural resource protection, outdoor recreation, hazard mitigation (such as flood and fire zones), and the production of resources like agriculture. Additional considerations include open space that supports military readiness or protects tribal resources.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

165

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 3
Quimby Act
Government Code §66477, known as the Quimby Act, allows cities and counties to require residential subdivisions to dedicate land or pay in-lieu fees for park and recreational purposes. These dedications or fees are then used to fund new park and open space development in consideration of population growth necessitating additional public open spaces.

Public Park Preservation Act
The Public Park Preservation Act (§5400–§5409) restricts the sale, lease, or disposal of public parkland unless a replacement of equivalent size and function is provided. This protects publicly accessible parks from being converted to non-recreational uses without due process and community benefit.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of open spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities. The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Parks and Open Space Element must be aligned with regional priorities and local planning efforts. On the regional scale, open space planning is often coordinated through countywide or multi-jurisdictional strategies. For Foster City, relevant partners include OneShoreline, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), each of which plays a role in guiding land use and resource conservation within the San Francisco Bay Area. These agencies provide policy guidance and mapping resources that help local governments identify priority areas for natural infrastructure, shoreline buffers, habitat corridors, and sea level rise adaptation.

At the local level, the Parks and Open Space Element provides the overarching vision implemented by Foster City’s Parks Master Plan and Capital Improvement Program. These documents identify specific opportunities for acquiring, improving, and maintaining parks and recreational spaces in alignment with the vision of the Parks and Open Space Element. The Element also integrates the City’s broader environmental goals, such as climate resilience, stormwater management, and habitat restoration by incorporating nature-based solutions and equitable access principles into the design and stewardship of

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

166

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 4
open spaces. The alignment between regional frameworks and local initiatives ensures that Foster City’s open space planning supports both community priorities and broader environmental sustainability goals.

Several local and regional plans and programs provide additional guidance and are referenced throughout this Element. Brief descriptions are provided below to give context when these plans are mentioned.
• The Parks Master Plan was developed concurrently with this Element, the Parks Master Plan provides a detailed systemwide analysis of park conditions, recreational needs, and community priorities. It includes site-specific recommendations, amenity standards, and an implementation strategy to guide future investments.
• The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies, prioritizes, and funds infrastructure projects, including park and open space improvements.
• The Lagoon Management Plan provides policies and actions for long-term stewardship pf the City’s lagoon system, including water quality monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The Plan also addresses ecological concerns such as runoff, algal blooms, and wildlife impacts, ensuring the lagoon remains a safe, healthy, and enjoyable resource for recreation and habitat. • The Integrated Canada Goose Population Management Plan establishes strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreational use. This plan complements the Lagoon Management Plan by addressing a major source of non-point pollution and nuisance conditions. • The Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan (2026) will guide the creation of a connected network of trails and bikeways that link parks, open spaces, neighborhoods, and the Levee Pedway. The Plan will aim to support active transportation, recreation, and access to natural areas.

Relationship to the Foster City Parks Master Plan
The update to the Parks and Open Space Element was developed concurrently with the 2025 Parks Master Plan. These two documents are closely linked; the Parks and Open Space Element establishes a citywide vision and high-level framework to guide the planning, development, and stewardship of Foster City’s parks, recreational facilities, and open space resources. As shown in Figure 1, the Parks Master Plan builds on this foundation with a more detailed assessment of community needs and priorities. The Parks Master Plan includes specific recommendations and an implementation strategy to help realize the City's long-term vision and ensure that parks and open spaces continue to support both ecological functions and community well-being.

Because these efforts were conducted in parallel, much of the detailed community engagement and needs assessment from the Parks Master Plan has been integrated into this Element, further strengthening its vision and policy framework for the future of parks and open space in Foster City.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

167

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 5
Figure 1 Relationship Between the Parks and Open Space Element and the Parks Master Plan

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

168

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 6
Background
The update process for the Parks and Open Space Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions, featuring both a systemwide analysis that covered level of service, access, connectivity, usage, and amenities, as well as detailed evaluations of individual park sites. As shown in Figure 2, extensive community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan, ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of both the Parks Master Plan and this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Parks and Open Space Element.

Figure 2 Community Engagement Overview

Parks and Open Space System
Parks
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 3, Foster City has approximately 113 acres of publicly accessible parks and open spaces that shape the city’s recreational and ecological landscape. Many of these spaces are notable for features such as well-maintained landscaping, lagoon and bayfront views, shaded picnic areas, and family-friendly playgrounds that encourage regular use. The city is anchored by four large community parks, Leo J. Ryan Park, Sea Cloud Park, Boothbay Park, and Edgewater Park, which offer a wide range of amenities such as sports fields and courts, playgrounds, and group picnic areas that attract diverse users from across the community. Leo J. Ryan Park serves as a hub for major community events and is the site of Foster City’s new community center. The center will offer flexible spaces and upgraded amenities to better serve residents’ needs.

In addition to community parks, Foster City is home to a network of smaller neighborhood and mini parks nestled within residential areas. These parks provide everyday recreational opportunities and are

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

169

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 7
designed to meet the specific needs of nearby residents. The city also includes three special-use parks dedicated to unique recreational activities such as windsurfing and dog play.

Foster City’s park system includes large community parks like Sea Cloud Park (left), popular neighborhood parks like Catamaran (middle) and mini parks that serve local needs, like Ketch Park (right).

Open Space
Foster City contains a diverse range of open spaces that enhance environmental quality and provide recreational and ecological value. In addition to the 24 parks, the city includes approximately 22 acres of publicly accessible open space along trails and 41 acres of open space with restricted access, much of which consists of sensitive habitat along the levee system and protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Public access is generally discouraged as these areas consist of sensitive habitat along the levee pedway. The shorelines along the Belmont Slough are protected as a part of the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. The CDFW oversees the ecological health and wildlife protection in the area. Natural areas like the Belmont Slough offer scenic trails and habitat for wildlife, and the city features the Foster City Lagoon, described further below. The lagoon primarily supports drainage and water-based recreation, and has some ecological value.

Water Bodies
The Foster City Lagoon is a major recreational feature and is central to the community’s identity. The Lagoon covers approximately 218 acres, holding approximately 1,300 acre-feet of water, and winds through several neighborhoods in Foster City, fronting many of the City’s parks and open spaces.

Residents engage in water-based recreational activities such as kayaking, paddling, and boating, and the Lagoon is central to many Foster City community events. Water testing in the lagoon has detected avian DNA, and while the lagoon supports a large Canada Geese population, the results cannot be traced specifically to geese or to any single location. Nevertheless, the presence of Canada Geese contributes to ongoing challenges with cleanliness and maintenance. Outside of designated beach areas, water quality is generally similar to bay water.

Just as important, the San Francisco Bay creates an enhanced experience for people using the Levee Pedway and Bay-adjacent parks such as Baywinds, Gateshead, Shorebird, and Bridgeview. The San Francisco Bay is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. The Bay also offers a wide range of recreational opportunities, including kayaking, sailing, birdwatching, and waterfront trails, making it a vital natural and cultural resource that connects communities to the region’s environmental heritage while promoting outdoor access and stewardship.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

170

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 8

The Foster City Lagoon (left and middle) and the San Franscico Bay are important recreational assets in the community.

Trails
Wrapping around the perimeter of Foster City’s waterfront edge is the Levee Pedway. This multi-use pathway is a segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail, and serves as a recreational asset for people walking, jogging, and biking. The trail runs past several parks and open spaces while also providing a continuous path without requiring on-street travel. In addition to the Levee Pedway, neighborhood trails provide local connections throughout Foster City. The Levee Pedway and other trails in Foster City are managed by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, which oversees maintenance and improvements to support safe, accessible routes for walking, biking, and recreation.

The Levee Pedway (left and middle) is a heavily-used regional route that is supported by the City’s local neighborhood trails (right, source: Google Streetview).

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

171

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 9
Table 1 Parks and Open Space Inventory
Park Number Acres Major Amenities
Community Parks 4 64.7
Boothbay 11.2 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Volleyball Court, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Edgewater 8.5 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Leo J Ryan 20.7 Basketball Court, Pickleball Courts, Bocce Ball Courts, Tennis Courts, Beach, Boat Launch
Sea Cloud 24 Playground, Ballfields, Soccer/Multipurpose Fields, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Neighborhood Parks 10 33.7
Catamaran 5.9 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Court, Volleyball Courts, Restroom
Erckenbrack 3.5 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Farragut 3.9 Playground, Restroom
Gull 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Kildeer 2.4 Playground
Marlin 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Port Royal 4.0 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Restroom, Parking Lot
Shad 2.1 Playground, Basketball Court, Restroom
Shorebird 3.5 Restroom
Sunfish 2.4 Playground, Basketball Court
Mini Parks 8 7.5
Arcturus 0.8 Playground
Gateshead 0.7 None
Ketch 1.6 Playground, Basketball Court
Leo 0.1 None
Pompano 0.5 None
Turnstone 1.5 Playground, Basketball Court
Town Center Park* 1.1 None
Pilgrim Triton* 1.2 Playground, Picnic Area
Special Use Parks 3 7.7
Bridgeview 3.2 Restroom, Parking Lot
Baywinds 1.3 Restroom, Shower
Boat/Dog 3.2 Restroom, Boat Launch, Dog Park, Parking Lot Subtotal, Parks 25 113.6
Open Space

63 Publicly Accessible Open Space

22 Restricted Access Open Space

41 Lagoon

218

*Pilgrim Triton and Town Center Park are private parks, but are publicly accessible.

Source: City of Foster City 2025.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

172

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 10
Figure 3 Foster City Parks & Open Spaces

Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

173

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 11
Park Access
As shown in Figure 4, all of Foster City’s residential neighborhoods are within a 10-minute walk of a park, an aspirational standard that many cities struggle to achieve. While there are portions of the City that are beyond a 10-minute walk from a park, these are primarily employment areas.

Demographic patterns offer insight into how park access and recreational resources can best serve the community. In central Foster City, particularly along the Foster City Boulevard corridor, a larger population of older adults (65 and over) presents an opportunity to enhance amenities and programs that support seniors. Youth, by contrast, are more evenly spread throughout the city, although central neighborhoods overall tend to have the highest population density. Park access is generally well- distributed across all racial and income groups. While Foster City’s population is predominantly Asian and/or White, there are no distinct clusters of culturally specific communities that would require targeted outreach or specialized facilities.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

174

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 12
Figure 4 Foster City Park Walksheds

Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

175

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 13
Park Acreage
Park acreage level of service (LOS) measures the availability of parks and recreational facilities relative to a community’s population, helping promote equitable access and adequate resources. As shown in Table 2, Foster City currently offers 3.2 acres of developed park land per 1,000 residents, which is somewhat higher than the average of similar local communities. The Parks and Open Space Element recommends maintaining the existing developed parkland acreage of 113.6 acres. The City could explore adding additional parkland by exploring conversion of Sea Cloud II site, as discussed in detail below (see Opportunity Sites). It shall be noted that the LOS in 2040 with additional growth and without additional parkland would be 2.9.

As Foster City grows, the Parks and Open Space Element also recommends establishing an appropriate LOS balances future housing and community preference.

Table 2 Park Acreage Level of Service
City Acres
Publicly
Accessible
Private Acres Total Acres
Current Level of
Service (LOS)
(acres/1000
residents)
Local Average
LOS1 (acres/1000
residents)
Parks 110.6 2.3 113.6 3.2 2.8
Open Space 22.0 0 22.0 0.6 NA
Grand Total 132.6 2.3 135.6 3.8 NA
Recreation Amenities
Table 3 summarizes the inventory of recreation amenities in Foster City’s parks, indicates existing level of service for these amenities, and establishes recreation amenity standards based on local and national trends, as well as Foster City’s unique needs. Foster City provides a high level of service for most major recreational amenities, particularly multi-use fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and playgrounds. By 2040, additional amenities needed to meet projected demand include at least four pickleball courts, one volleyball court, and four reservable picnic shelters. This analysis focuses on traditional park amenities commonly tracked by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). However, it does not capture other important community needs, such as trails, shade trees, walking paths within parks, community gardens, and more, which were highlighted through community engagement (see Engagement Results for Parks and Open Space).

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

176

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 14
Table 3 Park Recreation Amenity Level of Service
Amenity Inventory
Current LOS
(pop. per
amenity)
Local
Average
LOS 1
(pop. per
amenity)
National
Average
LOS
(pop. per
amenity) 2
Priority
Investment
Rating
(PIR)3
LOS
Standard
(pop. per
amenity)
2040
Additional
Amenities
Needed
Diamond Field 10 3,500 4,878 3,007 Low 4,000 0
Soccer
Multipurpose
Field
12 2,917 8,212 3,333 Low 4,000 0
Basketball Court 8 4,376 7,294 7,501 Low 7,000 0
Tennis Court 13 2,693 6,151 5,461 Medium 4,000 0
Pickleball Court 6 5,834 9,124 7,737 Medium 4,000 4
Bocce Ball Court 4 8,751 N/A N/A Low 9,000 0
Volleyball Court 2 17,502 N/A 14,280 Medium 15,000 1
Dog Park 1 35,004 31,087 27,508 Medium 30,000 0
Playgrounds 15 2,334 3,973 3,105 Low 3,500 0
Reservable Picnic
Tables
3 11,668 6,572 N/A Medium/
High
6,000 4
1 Average level of service for comparable Bay Area communities (Belmont, Burlingame, Menlo Park, Millbrae, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco). Source: Parks Master Plan Benchmark Analysis. 2 For agencies serving communities of between 20,000 and 49,999 residents. Source: National Recreation and Park Association, 2024. 3 Priority Investment Rating is an index score based on residents’ level of unmet need and level of importance for each amenity. Source:

Parks Master Plan Community Survey, 2024
Park Use
A park usage analysis was also conducted based on data from Placer.ai and revealed how amenities and user demographics influence visitation patterns, offering insights that can guide future planning, investment, and improvements in Foster City’s parks.1
Catering to Residents and Visitors
Foster City parks primarily cater to residents. However, parks like Baywinds Park and Leo J. Ryan Park attract significant non-resident visitation and have the potential for cost recovery opportunities through user fees, equipment rentals, or other strategies. Other parks with desirable recreation amenities, like Sea Cloud, may also have potential to be leveraged for more cost recovery.

Extending Use
Lighting and shade play a role in shaping park usage patterns, both seasonally and throughout the day.

Enhanced lighting can extend usability into evening hours while being designed to not disturb surrounding residential areas. Adding shade trees and structures could also improve comfort and attract

1 PlacerAI is an analytics platform that leverages anonymous mobile location data to analyze how people move through and interact with different spaces.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

177

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 15
more users during peak sunlight. These upgrades could also promote greater year-round accessibility and enjoyment of parks.

Understanding Park Users
Foster City’s parks should reflect the diversity of the community and the varying ways residents engage with outdoor spaces. Young adults, Hispanic/Latino families, and households with lower to moderate incomes tend to use parks frequently, while seniors, middle-aged adults, and Asian residents, who make up the city’s largest demographic group, appear less represented in park use.2 These patterns point to opportunities to broaden the appeal of Foster City’s parks by ensuring amenities remain affordable and accessible, offering culturally inclusive programs, improving language access, and enhancing park features that meet the needs of all residents.

Park Site Assessment

Foster City Parks are safe, well -maintained and have diverse recreational amenities , though key challenges include Geese habitation and lack of comfort amenities.

Foster City parks were evaluated for access, safety, functionality, and condition. Each park was considered from the perspective of strengths and areas for improvement. Stunning waterfront views at Leo J. Ryan Park and the variety of diverse activities at Sea Cloud Park make those parks attractive destinations for local and regional community members. The park system also faces challenges, including geese droppings particularly at parks with access to the lagoon, and a lack of signage and pathways at parks like Edgewater and Pompano parks. Strengths and challenges are summarized below.

2 It should be noted that visitor demographic data is inferred based on a visitor’s census block group, providing insights into the demographic composition of neighborhoods rather than the specific traits of individual users.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

178

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 16

Opportunity Sites
Foster City is a nearly built-out community with a well-distributed park system and relatively limited undeveloped open space areas. Foster City’s greatest opportunities to expand recreation opportunities lie in enhancing existing parks and facilities. However, two key sites, Sea Cloud II and the Baywinds area, present unique opportunities to introduce new public open spaces that may both provide additional recreational value and also support multiple ecological and resiliency benefits.

Sea Cloud II Site
Adjacent to Sea Cloud Park lies a 21-acre, City-owned open space known as Sea Cloud II, shown in Figure 5. Designated by the Army Corps of Engineers as a dredge material deposit site in 2018, the area has since evolved into a seasonal retention basin and wetland, supporting a mix of natural and invasive vegetation. In recent years, protected bird species have been observed nesting on-site, highlighting the ecological significance of the area and the importance of thoughtful stewardship. Currently fenced off and inaccessible to the public, the site also lacks direct connectivity to Sea Cloud Park and the Bay Trail.

With further study, community visioning, and targeted improvements, it has the potential to become a valuable ecological resource and a recreation asset.

Due to the potential presence of wetland and sensitive habitat areas on portions of the site, the scope of potential improvements is not yet fully known. Additional environmental analysis and close coordination with State and regional regulatory agencies will be necessary to clarify the site’s constraints and opportunities. With that understanding, the City could develop a long-term vision that protects and enhances the site's natural features while improving connectivity to the Bay Trail and potentially introducing recreational amenities.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

179

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 17
Figure 5 Sea Cloud II Site Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation including elevated boardwalk, wildlife viewing areas, and docks.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

180

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 18
Baywinds Park
At just 1.3 acres, Baywinds Park is one of Foster City’s smallest parks, tucked into the northwestern edge of the city along the Bay. The park is popular for windsurfing and attracts people from around the region for that activity. However, the surrounding properties include extensive wetlands, open space, and recreational assets, most notably the 25-acre Mariners Point Golf Center and Driving Range and approximately 25 acres of Caltrans-owned undeveloped land including wetlands. Together, these sites (shown in Figure 6) present a unique opportunity to create a more integrated, nature-focused recreation destination that could support habitat restoration, wildlife viewing, environmental education, picnicking, and other passive uses.

The Mariners Point Golf Center is a valued recreational amenity, currently leased by the City and the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to a private operator. While the long-term vision for the site has not yet been determined, its future use could significantly influence the area’s recreational potential. If the golf course remains indefinitely, improvements could enhance connectivity with Baywinds Park and surrounding open space. If the site is ever repurposed, there may be an opportunity to expand parkland, restore natural habitat, or introduce other recreational facilities.

The Caltrans-owned parcels also represent a strategic opportunity. The City may pursue partnerships or acquisition opportunities that would support site improvements, habitat restoration, and expanded public access.

Figure 6 Baywinds Park Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation, including a board walk, nature center, and relaxation areas.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

181

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 19
Engagement Results for Parks & Open Space
During the planning process, hundreds of residents shared their insights on the parks and open space system through a variety of engagement opportunities, including workshops, pop-up events, surveys, focus groups, and more. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Parks Master Plan Community Survey
A strong indicator of community preferences came from the Parks Master Plan Community Survey, conducted by ETC Institute in winter 2024–2025 through a mailed and online questionnaire sent to a random sample of Foster City households. With over 300 participants and a 95 percent confidence level, the survey results are considered reflective of the city’s population. The survey found that 85 percent of residents are satisfied or very satisfied with Foster City’s parks and recreation system—well above the national average of 62 percent. To identify resident priorities for recreation amenities and programming, ETC used its Priority Investment Rating (PIR) tool, which equally weighs the importance of a facility and the level of unmet need, as reported by survey respondents. As shown in Figure 7, top priorities identified include multi-use trails, a recreation center, indoor fitness equipment, a swimming pool, beaches, trees and shade, and walking trails in parks.

Figure 7 Foster City Park Amenity Priorities

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

182

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 20
Community Engagement Takeaways
Hundreds of engaged residents have shed light on the aspects of the parks and recreation system that should be improved, added, or prioritized. Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Trails & Connectivity

• Trails are highly valued, and residents greatly appreciate the Levee Pedway. • Residents desire additional trails connecting neighborhoods, parks, and the Levee Pedway.
• Trail improvements are needed, including increased lighting, signage, and safety.

Beaches & Water Quality

• Issues with water quality and beach conditions deter recreational use. • There are opportunities to activate the water through additional amenities, access points, and water-related programming.
• Community members have strong interest in activating the Lagoon’s edges, especially through outdoor dining.

New Park Experiences

• Foster City has a great park system, with fantastic active recreation facilities. • Residents would welcome new features to further activate and increase identity through new and unique experiences.
• There is demand for more passive spaces, such as walking paths, picnic areas, beaches, and natural open spaces.

Park Comfort

• Park users would benefit from more comfortable places to relax and walk through improved shade, pathways, and seating.
• Some highly visited parks need improved or expanded restrooms.

Indoor Recreation & Swimming

• Residents share a desire for fitness, senior, arts, and cultural programs, reinforcing the need for the new Community Center.
• Indoor fitness equipment and a swimming pool are community needs that are so far unmet with current plans.
• School joint-use agreements are essential for the community’s access to gymnasiums.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

183

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 21
Programming and Events
Programming and events are key elements of park facilities and open spaces in Foster City. Participation is reinforced by the settings themselves: waterfront views at Leo Ryan, shaded lawns at Boothbay, and playgrounds near picnic areas all create inviting environments for both organized programs and casual community use. The City offers a variety of programs and services that fall into the following core program areas:
• Afterschool Programs: Provide programming on elementary school campuses on early dismissal days.
• Athletics: Foster healthy lifestyles and promoting lifelong wellness throughout the community. • Camps: Full-day camps for children ages 4 to 13.
• Community Events: Engage Foster City residents and visitors with free to low-cost events. • Lifelong Learning and Wellness: Various classes offered year-round that provide opportunities for community engagement.
• Reservations and Rentals: Rentable rooms and park spaces that accommodate different types of events, meetings and parties.

Serving All Ages
The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department provides a balance of programs and services across all age segments. The Department should continue to provide programs across all age groups and reevaluate program offerings each year with the goal of keeping programs responsive to user needs.

Table 4 provides a summary of the various recreational programs offered to different age groups within Foster City.

Table 4 Ages Served by Recreational Core Program Area
Ages Served
Core Program Area
Preschool
(5 and under)
Elementary
(6-12)
Teens
(13-17)
Young
Adult
(18-34)
Adult
(35-54)
Active Adult
(55-64)
Senior
(65+)
Afterschool
Enrichment Program
X
Athletics X X X X X X X
Community Events X X X X X X X
Facility & Park Rentals X X X X
Youth & Adult Contract
Classes & Specialty
Camps

X X X X X X
Teen Afterschool
Program
X
Youth & Teen Camps X X X
Source: Foster City Parks Master Plan Program and Services Assessment, PROS Consulting, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

184

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 22
Engagement Results on Programming
The Parks Master Plan Community Survey sheds light on community interests and needs for programming and events:
• 46 percent of residents have participated in Foster City programs in the past 12 months, significantly more than the national average of 36 percent. By weighing the importance of a program and the level of unmet need, fitness/wellness programs, community special events, outdoor recreation, programs for seniors, cultural enrichment programs, visual arts/crafts programs, performing arts programs, and pickleball lessons and leagues emerged as top priorities for residents (see Figure 8). • The biggest barrier to program participation was a lack of awareness, with 27 percent of residents indicating they did not know what was being offered. Other top barriers included inconvenient program times (23 percent) and being too busy or not interested in participating (15 percent).

Figure 8 Program and Event Priorities from the Statistically Valid Community Survey

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

185

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 23
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance is needed for many parks, facilities, and amenities to promote functionality, safety, and aesthetic appeal for Foster City residents.

Engagement Results on Maintenance
The community engagement process surfaced several key insights related to park operations and maintenance. Feedback from the survey and open-ended comments highlighted both areas of satisfaction and specific concerns that can help guide future improvements. • Physical Condition Generally Rated Well, But Gaps Remain.

While 90 percent of residents rated park conditions as “excellent” or “good,” 9 percent rated them as only “fair” or “poor,” signaling pockets of maintenance issues that may be addressed through targeted interventions.
• Restroom and Trail Maintenance Need Greater Emphasis.

An Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) analysis identified paved path/trails, restrooms, and waterways/beaches as the top two priorities for maintenance. These areas had high importance but relatively lower satisfaction scores, indicating strong community demand for better upkeep. • Cleanliness and Environmental Conditions Are Concerns.

Although not always formally listed, geese droppings were repeatedly mentioned in open-ended comments as a major deterrent to park use, suggesting the need for more proactive sanitation and environmental management as part of routine maintenance.

Maintenance Assessment
A Park Maintenance and Operations Assessment was conducted as part of the Foster City Parks Master Plan, analyzing current maintenance practices, staffing levels, service standards, and operational challenges across the city’s park system. The assessment evaluated how the City maintains its parks and open spaces and reviewed key functions such as turf management, irrigation, equipment upkeep, and trail maintenance.

Key challenges that came out of this assessment included:
• Lack of a Formal Maintenance Management Plan
While some standards exist, the City does not have a fully documented plan tracking work performance and outcomes by park.
• No GIS-Based Asset Management System
The absence of such a system limits the City’s ability to track maintenance needs, costs, and asset lifecycles efficiently.
• Underfunding of Maintenance Operations
Annual park maintenance funding falls short compared to the level needed for optimal service. • Well-Equipped but Needs Continued Investment
The City currently has the necessary vehicles and equipment but must reinvest as the system grows to maintain service levels.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

186

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 24
Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Foster City’s open space network presents several meaningful opportunities for enhancing natural habitat and wildlife compatibility, including targeted rewilding that can enhance ecological integrity and restore natural processes across the urban landscape. Guided by the provisions of SB 1425, the City can pursue strategies that preserve, enhance, and expand habitat areas within and adjacent to developed zones. The City’s open spaces are identified in Figure 9, below.

Belmont Slough, which forms a natural boundary between Foster City and Redwood Shores, is a prime opportunity area for rewilding. The surrounding wetlands provide vital habitat for shorebirds and native plant communities such as cordgrass and pickleweed. With portions of the shoreline under the management of the CDFW and others privately owned, there are opportunities for both targeted and coordinated restoration efforts such as marshland expansion, the creation of buffer zones using native vegetation, and formal habitat restoration plans that involve multiple local and regional agencies and funding sources.

Seal Slough, also known as Marina Lagoon, represents another opportunity to support habitat connectivity and ecological health. While much of the slough is managed by the City of San Mateo, Foster City shares responsibility for adjacent areas and could support and collaborate on restoration efforts. Strategies may include riparian plantings, removal of invasive species, and the establishment of small-scale wildlife corridors.

Beyond these tidal and riparian corridors, Foster City’s urban parks and landscaped areas offer potential for small-scale rewilding. Parks such as Boothbay and Port Royal could be enhanced by replacing portions of ornamental lawns with native, drought-tolerant plants, introducing wildflower meadows, or establishing gardens focused on native species. Even highly engineered shoreline areas could benefit from nature-based enhancements, such as vegetated buffer strips and boardwalks that improve both habitat quality and public engagement with natural spaces. For additional information and policies on habitat and wildlife management and connectivity, please see the Conservation Element.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

187

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 25
Figure 9 Publicly Accessible Open Space

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

188

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 26
Climate Resiliency
Foster City’s open spaces also play a critical role in advancing the City’s climate resiliency goals by serving as buffers against climate-related hazards and offering natural systems that help moderate environmental stressors. Coastal wetlands and shoreline open spaces, such as those near Belmont Slough and the Bay Trail, absorb floodwaters, reduce wave energy, and space for marsh migration and living-shoreline measures needed to accommodate sea level rise over time.

Mapping of sea level rise scenarios illustrates that while Foster City’s upgraded levee provides critical protection against current coastal hazards, the community remains vulnerable to future conditions driven by climate change. Figure 10 shows a mid-century scenario of approximately 0.8 feet of SLR (about the increase expected during typical daily high tides by 2050, absent any storms). Under this scenario, portions of the shoreline, including parks, trails, and some low-lying residential areas (such as those along Beach Park Boulevard and the fringes of the central lagoon) could experience more frequent tidal flooding. Vulnerability increases further when considering the added impact of severe coastal storms or King Tide events on top of elevated sea levels. Figure 11 illustrates Foster City’s present-day 100-year storm surge scenario, which in combination with sea level rise could exceed the capacity of existing flood protection. Such an event could affect residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, critical infrastructure, and transportation routes, including portions of Highway 101.

Preserving, enhancing, and restoring these areas with native vegetation and habitat restoration strengthens their ability to sequester and store carbon, filter pollutants, and reduce the impacts of storm surges on adjacent neighborhoods and critical infrastructure. Open spaces also bolster ecological resilience by preserving habitat for habitat corridors that allow species to migrate and adapt to rising temperatures and shifting ecosystems, countering regional habitat fragmentation in line with AB 1889.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

189

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 27
Figure 10 Sea Level Rise Inundation (0.8 feet)

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

190

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 28
Figure 11 Present-Day (No Sea Level Rise) 100-Year Storm Inundation Risk

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

191

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 29
Another emerging concern is groundwater rise. As sea level rises, the water table in Foster City will rise as well, since the city is built on permeable fill and former marsh and the water table will rise as sea level rises. Rising groundwater can lead to flooding from below, even if surface levees hold back the Bay from direct coastal inundation. Figure 12 displays a groundwater rise hazard map for Foster City, highlighting areas particularly susceptible to groundwater rise, particularly the shoreline zones and lands around the lagoon. In these areas, the water table will likely eventually breach the surface or infiltrate underground infrastructure, causing flooding of housing foundations, road base materials, or within storm sewers. Groundwater rise could also induce soil instability or mobilize pollutants in soils.

To strengthen climate resilience and meet SB 1425 goals, Foster City should implement nature-based strategies, such as permeable surfaces, expanded tree canopy, and green stormwater infrastructure, to reduce heat, retain stormwater, and recharge shallow groundwater. For example, native plantings in shoreline parks and undeveloped parcels can strengthen soil stability, support pollinator populations, and reduce the need for irrigation. Meadow restoration and the creation of microhabitats within urban green spaces offer additional benefits by moderating temperatures and supporting localized ecosystems. As climate pressures intensify, integrating open space into the City’s adaptation strategy is vital for ecological function and for protecting the public health and safety of residents. These spaces offer cooler environments during heat waves, areas for passive stormwater retention, and opportunities for environmental education that can foster long-term stewardship and community resilience.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

192

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 30
Figure 12 Present Day (No Sea Level Rise) Groundwater Hazard

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

193

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 31
Goals and Policies
Parks and Recreation System
Goal POS-1 Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

Policy POS 1.1 Vibrant and Unique Parks. Aim for all Foster City parks to be vibrant and have a unique identity, incorporating in-demand and innovative features for evening activation.

Policy POS 1.2 Comfortable Parks. Support park comfort and appeal by adding or improving key features such as seating, lighting, shade, and restrooms.

Policy POS 1.3 Community Needs. Strive to make the parks and recreation system responsive to the recreation needs identified in the Parks Master Plan and through continued engagement.

Goal POS-2 Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 2.1 Connected Trail System. Create a citywide network of paths and trails for walking and biking that is safe and comfortable.

Policy POS 2.2 Navigating Parks. Promote easy access to and navigation within the City’s parks, lagoon, and trails by installing wayfinding signage and creating plans for multi-modal access.

Policy POS 2.3 Accessible & Inclusive. Promote accessibility and inclusivity in park facilities and programs through universal design and diverse, community-responsive activities.

Goal POS-3 The Foster City Lagoon is active and well-integrated with its surroundings.

Policy POS 3.1 Lagoon Access & Amenities. Provide places and amenities to view, enjoy and access the Lagoon.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

194

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 32
Policy POS 3.2 Waterfront Activation. Increase Lagoon activation through programming and events, improved water quality, and increased water-front activity.

Programming and Events
Goal POS-4 Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs.

Policy POS 4.1 Programming. Invest in high priority programs and services that bring residents together, serve all age groups, and are responsive to community needs and desires.

Policy POS 4.2 Community Events. Strengthen community events in Foster City by improving and expanding offerings and collaborating with other recreation providers.

Operations and Maintenance
Goal POS-5 Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

Policy POS 5.1 High Quality Maintenance. Continue to support high-quality park and facility maintenance by focusing on key maintenance priorities and investing in maintenance staff, tools, and equipment.

Policy POS 5.2 Funding Strategy. Develop and implement a funding strategy to realize the City’s vision for its parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 5.3 Plan and Engage Proactively. Promote long-term success through regular planning, transparent reporting, and ongoing community engagement.

Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Goal POS-6 Foster City’s parks and open spaces support native biodiversity, climate resilience, and ecological function through targeted rewilding, habitat restoration, and nature-based solutions.

Policy POS 6.1 Urban Rewilding. Implement urban rewilding projects to reintroduce natural processes, restore natural ecosystems, and promote biodiversity.

Policy POS 6.2 Habitat Linkages. Prioritize rewilding in areas that enhance or create new habitat linkages and corridors for wildlife movement.) Policy POS 6.3 Resilient Landscaping. Prioritize the use of native, drought-tolerant, and climate-resilient vegetation in existing parks and landscaped open

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

195

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 33
spaces to enhance habitat value, reduce water demand, and support pollinators.

Policy POS 6.4 Ecologically Beneficial Features. Integrate ecologically beneficial features, such as pollinator gardens, wildflower meadows, bioswales, and native plant corridors, into public parks, medians, and along trail networks.

Policy POS 6.5 Community Participation. Encourage inclusive community participation in habitat restoration through stewardship programs, youth engagement, and interpretive signage in rewilded open spaces.

Climate Resiliency
Goal POS-7 Foster City’s open space network is adaptively managed to strengthen resilience to climate change impacts, including sea level rise, extreme heat, and flood risk.

Policy POS 7.1 Multi-benefit Prioritization. Prioritize the preservation and restoration of undeveloped open spaces and natural areas that provide multi-benefit climate services, including flood protection, carbon sequestration, heat reduction, and habitat connectivity, particularly in underserved areas.

Policy POS 7.2 Climate Data Integration. Integrate future climate scenarios, such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat, into open space design, planning, and management decisions to support ecological resilience, adaptive capacity, and equitable public access.

Policy POS 7.3 Green Streets. Encourage the use of “green streets” that incorporate native vegetation, permeable surfaces, and stormwater features to enhance habitat and reduce runoff.

Policy POS 7.4 Green Infrastructure. Support the development of rooftop gardens, vertical greenery, and other integrated green infrastructure that enhances biodiversity and reduces energy use.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

196

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 34
Implementation Programs
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-a Enhance park activation and identity by reprogramming underutilized park spaces with in-demand or innovative park amenities/experiences, referencing the park-specific improvements identified in the Parks Master Plan.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-b As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, support the expansion of passive amenities such as walking trails, picnic areas, and natural open spaces.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-c As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, seek opportunities to increase shade in parks by planting trees and/or constructing shade structures, particularly at playgrounds and picnic areas.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.2
POS-d Add or improve seating, lighting, water fountains/refill stations, trash receptacles, restrooms, and bike racks to all parks where needed.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-1.2
POS-e Explore opportunities to expand access to indoor recreation and swimming facilities by pursuing or strengthening partnerships with San Mateo-Foster City School District and private recreation providers.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-1.3
POS-f As Foster City grows, the City will continue to maintain the existing developed parkland of 113.6 acres in Foster City.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-1.3
POS-g Determine an appropriate LOS that balances future housing and community preference and make necessary edits to Chapter 16.36 Parks and Recreation Facilities of Foster City Municipal Code.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Mid-term POS-1.3
POS-h Conduct a study of open space opportunity areas to assess their environmental constraints and natural assets. Use these insights to create a master plan that balances ecological restoration with expanded recreational access and amenities.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Short-term POS-1.3
POS-i Explore opportunities for creating a network of paths and trails that connect existing city parks, trails, and community destinations. Work cross- departmentally to implement the Bike Pedestrian Master Plan 2026.

Public Works Community
Development/Parks
and Recreation
Long-term POS-2.1
POS-j Consider additional improvements to the Levee Pedway, including distance markers, signage, and lighting, to create comfortable conditions for all trail users.

Public Works

Parks and
Recreation/Commu
nity Development
Long-term POS-2.1

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

197

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 35
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-k Explore strategies for establishing clear and consistent signage across the park and recreation system.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-2.2
POS-l Enhance ADA-compliant access at all parks. Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-2.3 POS-m Promote cross-cultural and multi-generational programming and facilities, recognizing the full diversity of Foster City residents.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-2.3
POS-n Explore opportunities to enhance the integration of the design of lagoon- adjacent parks with the lagoon, providing places to view, enjoy, and access the water, including boat docking opportunities.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-3.1
POS-o Collaborate across departments to continue to implement the Lagoon Water Quality Management Plan and Canada Goose Population Management Plan to improve cleanliness of lagoon-adjacent parks and lagoon water quality.

Public Works Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-p Support land use regulatory changes to encourage public access and activation along the lagoon as part of future development.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-q Continue to support the use of the lagoon for community events such as regattas, performances, etc.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-3.2
POS-r Explore opportunities to activate recreational use of the lagoon. Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-3.2 POS-s Pursue opportunities to expand high-demand recreational programs/events that serve residents of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-4.1
POS-t Continue to support and expand special events that activate community parks in all seasons.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-u Complement and connect with other recreation providers and event sponsors, developing partnerships when advantageous.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-v Encourage the dedication of staff resources to help identify and secure funding that supports park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programming and events.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-5.3
POS-w Continue to foster the provision of high-quality parks and recreation services through the strategic allocation of funds for recreation programming, park/facility maintenance, and lifecycle improvements to maintain consistent financial support for meeting accepted service levels.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-5.3
POS-x Promote the use of consistent community engagement practices, such as surveys, town halls, and focus groups, to continue to gather input on evolving recreational needs and preferences.

Parks and Recreation Communications Ongoing POS-5.4

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

198

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 36
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-y Support the identification of at least one City park or trail-adjacent open space for pilot naturalization projects that include, but are not limited to, replacement of turf or ornamental plantings with native vegetation.

Monitor for habitat use, water savings, and community reception.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-6.1, POS-

6.3 POS-z Explore opportunities to map and identify areas within the City’s parks and open spaces to naturalize with the aim of connecting natural areas with rewilded areas. Prioritize rewilding efforts in places where the clearest linkages for species movement between areas.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-6.2
POS-aa Seek opportunities to host seasonal events in collaboration with local schools, nonprofits, or native plant societies to involve residents in habitat restoration activities and promote awareness of urban ecology.

Parks and Recreation Communications Bi-Annual POS-6.4
POS-bb Actively seek State and federal funding opportunities that support land conservation, shoreline resilience, or wetland restoration, and coordinate with regional agencies for joint applications.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development/City
Manager’s Office
Ongoing POS-7.1, POS-

7.2 POS-cc Pursue the development of a climate-resilient open space web viewer that overlays sea level rise projections, habitat corridors, and flood-prone areas and use as a tool for determining the highest impact naturalization and resilience-focused projects to prioritize.

Community
Development
City Manager’s
Office
Long-term POS-7.2
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit A P_OS Element - Final Clean Version

199

EXHIBIT B
Parks and Open Space Element Legislative Consistency Checklist Government Code
Section
Description of
Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code § 65563 The Open Space Element
must provide a long-range
and comprehensive plan
for the preservation and
conservation of open
space lands.

Addressed The Element provides a
comprehensive, long-range framework
for parks and open space, establishing
goals, policies, and implementation
programs that ensure ongoing
stewardship, programming, and climate
resilience.

Gov. Code §65560(h)(1) The Open Space Element
must designate and
conserve open space for
the preservation of natural
resources such as habitat,
scientific study areas,
rivers and streams, and
watersheds.

Addressed Goals POS-6 and POS-7 commit to
habitat restoration, urban rewilding,
protection of watershed lands, and
integrating scientific/ecological study
opportunities. Implementation programs
(POS-x, POS-y, POS-aa) specifically
advance rewilding, habitat corridors,
and shoreline resilience.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(2)
The Open Space Element
must identify and
conserve open space
lands used for the
managed production of
resources, including
forests, rangelands,
agriculture, groundwater
recharge areas, fisheries,
and minerals.

Partially
Applicable
Foster City does not contain any
managed production resources.

However, the Element addresses
groundwater recharge (POS-7.3, POS-

7.4).

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(3)
The Open Space Element
must provide for open
space dedicated to
outdoor recreation,
including parks, scenic
areas, cultural and historic
sites, trails, and
recreational corridors.

Addressed Recreational access is a central focus
of the Element. Goals POS-1 through
POS-4 and Programs POS-a–POS-s
ensure high-quality parks, recreation
amenities, trail connectivity, cultural and
community events, and scenic shoreline
access.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(4)
The Open Space Element
must conserve open
space lands needed for
public health and safety,
such as hazard areas,
floodplains, fire-risk areas,
and lands critical to
maintaining water and air
quality.

Addressed The Element addresses sea level rise,
flood hazards, and groundwater rise in
open spaces (POS-7.1–7.4, POS-bb).

The Element describes and includes
policy for the use of open space as a
buffer for climate hazards, improving air
quality, floodwater management, and
reducing heat island effects.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(5)
The Open Space Element
must account for and
protect open space in
support of the operational
integrity of military
installations.

Not Applicable No military installations or training areas are located in or adjacent to Foster City.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit B P_OS Element - Legislative Consistency Checklist

200

Government Code
Section
Description of
Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code §65560(h)
(6)
The Open Space Element
must include provisions
for conserving open space
that protects tribal cultural
resources, traditional
lands, and places of
significance.

Addressed Foster City does not contain any open
space for the protection of tribal
resources. The Element acknowledges
tribal cultural resources in alignment
with Public Resources Code §5097.9
and §5097.993. Consultation was
conducted consistent with State law.

Gov. Code §65560(h)

Save El Toro Assn. v.

Days (1977)
74 Cal. App. 3d 64, 73
The Open Space Element
must include an inventory
of open space lands
important for the
preservation of natural
resources.

Addressed Background section includes a detailed
inventory of open spaces, including
Belmont Slough, Seal Slough, San
Francisco Bay shoreline, and the
Lagoon, with ecological value
highlighted.

Gov. Code §65562(a) The Open Space Element
must establish policies
that require open space
lands to be conserved
wherever possible.

Addressed Goal POS-6 and related policies
prioritize conservation and rewilding of
open space areas to maintain
ecological value and community
benefits.

Gov. Code §65562(b) The Open Space Element
must be coordinated with
State, regional, and local
open space conservation
plans to ensure
consistency and
effectiveness.

Addressed The Element emphasizes coordination
with OneShoreline, BCDC, ABAG, and
CDFW for shoreline resilience,
ecological restoration, and open space
planning.

Gov. Code §§65564,
65566, 65567, 65910
The Open Space Element
must include an action
program for
implementation, including
acquisition and disposal of
lands, zoning consistency,
subdivision and building
permit review, and
application of open-space
zoning.

Addressed Implementation Programs POS-g, POS-
aa, and POS-bb support acquisition
studies, funding strategies, and zoning
consistency. The Element affirms that
open space land use regulations must
align with the plan.

Gov. Code §65565.5

SB 1425 (2022)
Requires that Open Space
Element updates prioritize
multi-benefit uses of open
space, particularly in
underserved communities.

Plans must include an
action program to improve
equitable access, address
climate resilience (e.g.,
flood mitigation, cooling),
and incorporate rewilding
opportunities.

Addressed The Parks and Open Space Element
incorporates SB 1425 requirements
throughout. Goals POS-6 and POS-7
emphasize rewilding, habitat
restoration, climate resilience, and
multi-benefit open space management.

Policies POS-7.1 and POS-7.2 highlight
equitable access and climate
adaptation. Programs POS-x, POS-y,
POS-aa, and POS-bb commit to
naturalization pilots, mapping habitat
linkages, pursuing funding, and
developing a climate-resilient open
space web viewer.

7.1 Attachment 1 - Exhibit B P_OS Element - Legislative Consistency Checklist

201

3 9
4 3
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY REPEALING THE 2003 CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE 2025 CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND FINDING THAT THE

ADOPTION OF THE ELEMENT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a general plan contains the community vision for future growth, California law also requires each general plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302; and
WHEREAS, the mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety; and WHEREAS, Foster City’s Conservation Element was last adopted in May 2003 and reprinted as a separate element in September 2009; and WHEREAS, the State Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, LCI (previously known as the Office of Planning and Research or OPR) recommends comprehensively updating a General Plan every 10-15 years to reflect changes in community values, economic conditions, and emerging issues and challenges; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1425 requires that the Open Space Element be updated by January 1, 2026, with expanded requirements including consideration of climate resilience in coordination with the Safety Element; and WHEREAS, SB 1425 also explicitly focuses on "rewilding opportunities," or creating and preserving open space networks to support biological and recreational uses; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 1889 requires the General Plan Conservation Element to consider the effect of development within the jurisdiction on the movement of wildlife and habitat connectivity; and
WHEREAS, AB 1889 requires the Conservation Element, upon the next update of one or more elements on or after January 1, 2028, to, among other things, identify and analyze connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscape areas within the jurisdiction, identify and analyze existing or planned wildlife passage features, and consider the impacts of development and the barriers caused by development to wildlife, as defined, and habitat connectivity; and

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

202

3 9
4 3
WHEREAS, to ensure compliance with SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements in a timely manner, the City of Foster City began work on updating the two (2) Elements, including the Parks and Open Space Element, and Conservation Element; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.4 require that before a legislative body takes action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency shall refer the proposed action to a number of entities or conduct consultations with California Native American tribes that are on the contact list. The City has referred the Conservation Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission; and WHEREAS, no California Native American Tribe has requested consultation; and WHEREAS, the City conducted extensive community outreach, including one (1) joint workshop, two (2) focus groups, two (2) pop-up events, a dedicated webpage, and one (1) community priorities survey and social media, e-news, emails, and notices; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2025, the City published an administrative draft of the Conservation Element and requested public comment on the draft until September 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65353, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65354, the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider this Resolution regarding the Conservation Element, reviewed the Element and all pertinent documents and exhibits, staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission Resolution No. P-13- 25 with a majority of the Planning Commission (voted 4-0-0-1 (1-absent)) recommending City Council approval of the Draft 2025 Conservation Element; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2025, a public hearing notice was published in the newspaper (Foster City Islander) and posted in three public places, and mailed pursuant to California Code Section 65090 for the City Council public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the draft 2025 Conservation Element, all written correspondence, verbal testimony, staff reports, and supporting documents and reports prepared.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

203

3 9
4 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby finds that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.

2. The proposed project conforms to the provisions and standards of the General Plan in that the proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan.

3. The proposed General Plan Amendment complies with, and is required by, applicable State law.

4. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City. The amendments will ensure Foster City’s General Plan is consistent with current state law (including AB 1889 requirements on wildlife movement and habitat connectivity). The updated Element establishes the City’s vision, goals, policies, and implementation programs for conserving and managing natural resources such as biological habitats, air and water quality, energy, cultural and historic resources, and the urban forest. It also integrates climate resilience by addressing issues such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat.

5. The City, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has completed analysis, and the 2025 Conservation Element and determined that the Updates are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the “common sense exemption” in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which applies if it can be seen with certainty that a project will not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. The Updates involve the adoption of policy documents to establish the City’s vision, goals, policies, and programs for the provisioning and management of natural and recreational areas within the city, as well as the protection of natural and cultural resources. These policy documents, in and of themselves, do not include any proposed projects or development. The Updates do not propose or approve any physical development and will not result in changes to the physical environment, nor will they result in potential environmental impacts. To the extent that the Updates do identify potential future projects or development, those would be analyzed if and when the City approves those projects in accordance with CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City, therefore, repeals the 2003 Conservation Element and adopts the 2025 Conservation Element as set forth in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference and attached hereto.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

204

3 9
4 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a Resolution by the City Council of the City of Foster City at the Regular Meeting held on the 3rd day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________

STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

205

3 9
4 3

EXHIBIT A
Conservation Element – Final Clean Version

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

206

3 9
4 3

EXHIBIT B
Conservation Element Legislative Consistency Checklist

7.1 Attachment 2 - Conservation Element Resolution

207

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 1
Conservation Introduction

Foster City, 2025.

Purpose
The Conservation Element fulfills the State’s requirements for a Conservation Element and articulates Foster City’s long-term vision for conserving and managing its natural and cultural resources. Within this, it emphasizes environmental sustainability, community well-being, and climate resilience as central to the City’s management of natural resources.

This Element outlines the city’s environmental setting, highlights unique local resources, and establishes goals, policies, and implementation actions to support their protection, restoration, and sustainable use.

It guides stewardship of wildlife movement and connectivity and wildlife habitat, the urban forest, surface and groundwater, and historic, cultural, and tribal resources. It also supports efforts to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with state mandates.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for the content of this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key conservation considerations for Foster City. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for the conservation of natural resources. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

208

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 2

While these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Figure 1 identifies the parks and open spaces within Foster City. Figure 2 identifies protection responsibilities for each type of park, open space, and conservation area.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

209

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 3
Figure 1 Parks and Open Spaces

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

210

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 4
Figure 2 Protected Areas

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

211

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 5
Legal Requirements
The Conservation Element of the General Plan is guided by State law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, support ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(d) – Conservation Element Requirement
The primary legal foundation for the Conservation Element is Government Code §65302(d), which requires all general plans to include policies addressing the conservation, development, and use of natural resources. These include watersheds, forests, soils, rivers and other waters, harbors, fisheries, wildlife, minerals, and other natural systems. The statute emphasizes that policies must reflect local conditions, support long-term resource management, and be coordinated with efforts to protect air and water quality.

California Air Resources Board (CARB) and BAAQMD Guidance Statewide air quality policy is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which sets emission standards, regulates fuels and vehicles, and oversees programs aimed to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. At the regional level, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) prepares the Clean Air Plan to reduce pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, with an emphasis on cumulative pollution burdens in disproportionately impacted communities. The Conservation Element supports these goals by promoting land use patterns and infrastructure that reduce vehicle emissions, increase urban greening, and limit exposure to harmful pollutants, particularly near homes, schools, and other sensitive land uses.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of green spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities.

The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities. While most of the requirements of SB 1425 are met within the Parks and Open Space Element, many of the topics in this Element are closely related to the those covered within the Conservation Element.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

212

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 6
Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Conservation Element must align with several key regional and local planning efforts that support natural resource protection, habitat restoration, and climate resilience.
 The Climate Action Plan (CAP) establishes strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance climate resilience through energy efficiency, renewable energy, clean transportation, and sustainable land use.
 The Lagoon Management Plan outlines policies for maintaining water quality, controlling aquatic vegetation, and managing wildlife populations within the City’s lagoon system. It also provides a framework for public education and monitoring.
 The Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan provides strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreation.
 The Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan outline Foster City’s water supply reliability, drought management strategies, and contingency measures for shortages.
 The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Basin Plans (Basin Plans) establish water quality objectives, identify beneficial uses of water bodies (such as habitat or recreation), and include strategies to control pollution and manage watershed health. These Basin Plans are legally enforceable by the RWQCB and guide stormwater discharge permitting and waterway protection at the local level.
 The San Mateo County Sustainable Streets and Green Infrastructure Plan provides a framework for integrating green infrastructure, such as rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable pavements, into street design and public projects. It helps cities meet stormwater permit requirements while improving water quality, habitat, and streetscape aesthetics.  The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program provides a coordinated framework for cities to reduce stormwater pollution through infrastructure upgrades, public education, and monitoring.
 OneShoreline, the San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District, coordinates regional adaptation efforts related to sea level rise, tidal flooding, and shoreline ecosystem restoration. Its work supports integrated infrastructure projects that reduce flood risk while enhancing natural habitat.
 In compliance with SB 18 (Gov. Code § 65352.3), the City contacted all California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area. No responses requesting consultation were received.

This regional and local framework ensures that the Conservation Element is grounded in practical, science-based strategies that address both ecological function and community well-being.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

213

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 7
Background
The process for updating the Conservation Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions; evaluating the city’s natural resources, habitat areas, water and air quality, and energy infrastructure; and identifying opportunities to enhance ecological health and climate resilience. In addition, the analysis evaluated future considerations on sea level rise, groundwater rise, extreme heat, and air quality, and highlighted opportunities to enhance biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and equitable access to green space. As shown in Figure 3, community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan (discussed further in the Parks and Open Space Element), ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Conservation Element.

Figure 3 Community Engagement Overview

The public engagement process for the Conservation Element update was designed to gather input on key issues such as species preservation, habitat conservation, and water quality, while ensuring alignment with the ongoing Parks Master Plan update. A key tool in this effort was a dedicated project website that provided ongoing updates and hosted the Community Priorities Survey, which built on the Parks Master Plan survey by focusing on natural resources and conservation topics. This survey gathered valuable feedback from a diverse range of residents, with particular emphasis on underrepresented communities, helping shape policies related to biodiversity, open space access, and environmental equity. Pop-up events were also used to engage the community directly, allowing them to provide input on conservation priorities while also participating in the broader parks-related discussions.

Biological Resources
Despite its highly urbanized setting and origins as reclaimed marshland, Foster City continues to support a mosaic of natural habitats. Key ecological areas include tidal wetlands, mudflats, and the centrally located lagoon system, which together provide important habitat for migratory birds, small mammals, and aquatic species. The San Francisco Bay also borders the city to the north and east and is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. As shown in Figure 4, vegetation mapping has identified several habitat types within the city, including salt marsh, non-native forest, and native herbaceous communities. Notably, 21 special-status animal species and six plant species have been observed or are presumed present,

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

214

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 8
including the endangered Ridgeway’s rail and salt-marsh harvest mouse, both dependent on the city’s remaining tidal marshes.

Foster City’s biological resources face ongoing challenges from habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and urban runoff. Shoreline habitats are often constrained by levees and adjacent development, limiting their ecological function and the ability of species to migrate or adapt to environmental change. These pressures are compounded by climate-related stressors such as rising sea levels and shifting precipitation patterns.

Within this complex landscape, areas along Belmont Slough, Seal Slough, and underutilized park edges offer potential for habitat restoration and rewilding. These efforts could strengthen native biodiversity, improve habitat connectivity, and help restore key ecosystem services. In addition, Foster City’s extensive park system presents a valuable resource for targeted naturalization and improved linkages between natural areas to support wildlife movement and expand urban habitat in meaningful ways.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

215

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 9
Figure 4 Vegetation and Land Cover

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

216

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 10
Wildlife Connectivity
Wildlife movement in Foster City is shaped, and often limited, by urban infrastructure such as roads, levees, and dense development. Natural movement corridors are limited, typically confined to narrow greenways, fragmented shoreline edges, and the lagoon system. While the lagoon offers aesthetic and recreational value to residents and visitors as well as some habitat potential, its channelized design, steep edges, and proximity to human activity reduces its habitat value for many species.

Recognizing the importance of habitat connectivity, State law (AB 1889) now requires cities and counties to assess and enhance habitat connectivity for wildlife through their general plans. In Foster City, barriers to wildlife movement include:
 Highway 92, which disrupts north–south continuity
 Urban lighting, which interferes with the behavior of nocturnal species  Recreational activity, which can fragment habitats and deter sensitive wildlife As shown in Figure 5, much of Foster City is either urban or suburban, and therefore wildlife corridors and nursery sites are not present in much of the city. Wildlife connectivity areas are fragmented, and green spaces are often landscaped for recreation rather than habitat value, reducing their ecological function. However, with strategic design and targeted improvements, these spaces can support both human and ecological needs. Enhancing shoreline habitats, planting suitable vegetation, and implementing wildlife-friendly infrastructure such as culverts or buffer zones can create pathways for wildlife movement and better contribute to a resilient and biodiverse city.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

217

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 11
Figure 5 Wildlife Connectivity Areas

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

218

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 12
Coastal Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City’s shoreline borders the San Francisco Bay and includes estuarine and brackish marshes, particularly near Belmont Slough and the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. These areas serve as vital feeding and nesting grounds for numerous bird species, including some species of special concern. The Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve, a protected 268-acre salt marsh, supports sensitive species such as the Alameda song sparrow and Ridgeway’s rail and serves as a critical ecological buffer against urban development.

Foster City has made significant investments in engineered flood protection systems, including recent upgrades to its levee system, which play a critical role in safeguarding the community from storm surge and sea level rise. These infrastructure improvements represent an essential layer of protection for residents and assets. At the same time, this flood protection infrastructure can constrain natural ecological processes and limit the inland migration of wetlands, which play a vital role in preserving local ecological integrity by providing habitat for diverse wildlife, serving as temporary resting areas for migrating species, filtering water pollutants, and offering natural flood protection. As climate change accelerates, coastal ecosystems face increasing stress from rising groundwater, saline intrusion, and greater exposure of infrastructure. The continued loss of tidal marshes would reduce habitat availability and diminish the shoreline’s natural ability to buffer wave energy and filter pollutants.

Regional planning efforts, such as those led by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and OneShoreline, recognize the importance of complementing traditional infrastructure with natural systems, such as tidal marshes and mudflats, to strengthen shoreline resilience. By restoring degraded habitat and integrating nature-based features into levee design, Foster City can build on its recent investments to ensure long-term ecological and community resilience.

Climate Considerations
Climate change presents significant risks to Foster City’s biological resources. Rising temperatures, shifts in precipitation patterns, and sea level rise pose risks to habitat health, food and water availability for

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

219

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 13
wildlife, while potentially limiting access to necessary wildlife connectivity and migration corridors. Low- lying shoreline habitats face potential inundation in the future, which would result in the loss of critical wetlands, biodiversity corridors, and coastal buffer zones. Urban green spaces, such as parks and vegetated areas along the lagoon and coastline, can serve as important refuges and movement corridors for wildlife. However, they currently offer limited climate resilience opportunities due to sparse tree canopy and fragmented natural areas.

Adapting to climate change requires a multifaceted strategy that includes nature-based solutions such as wetland restoration, permeable surfaces, and urban forestry. These solutions can help preserve biodiversity and support species resilience, as well as other benefits such as mitigating flooding, reducing urban heat, and supporting habitat migration. In addition, the city is exploring a citywide tree canopy study, which, when paired with surface heat mapping and social vulnerability data, could guide future investments in climate-resilient green infrastructure and improve neighborhood-level adaptation strategies.

Water Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City maintains a network of engineered lagoons and canals designed primarily for stormwater management, flood control, and community recreation. These water features also provide secondary habitat for birds and aquatic species and are not used for potable water supply. The city’s drinking water is entirely imported via the Estero Municipal Improvement District, supplied by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Hetch Hetchy system. While Foster City does not currently utilize local groundwater for its municipal supply, it remains vulnerable to regional groundwater-level fluctuations driven by climate change. The development of this Element included coordination with EMID, and review of and alignment with applicable water supply, water quality, and groundwater management plans.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

220

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 14
Water Quality
Drinking water quality in Foster City is high, with the Estero Municipal Improvement District meeting or exceeding all State and federal standards. Water is treated at regional facilities before distribution and is continuously monitored. However, water quality issues are more pronounced in the city’s lagoon system, where elevated bacteria levels, especially enterococci, have led to periodic beach closures.

These issues are largely attributed to wildlife waste, stormwater runoff, and overgrown aquatic vegetation.

To address lagoon water quality, the City has adopted a Lagoon Management Plan, emphasizing routine monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The city also participates in regional programs to prevent stormwater pollution and maintain compliance with the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. While efforts are underway, water quality in the lagoon and shoreline areas will remain a concern until planned actions for improving runoff management, enhancing ecological buffers, and managing urban wildlife populations are implemented.

Water Supply
Foster City’s water supply is entirely imported through the Hetch Hetchy system, managed by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. During normal years, supply is projected to be adequate through 2045. However, in single and multiple dry years, demand is projected to outpace supply, with deficits exceeding 800 million gallons annually by 2045 under drought conditions. In the event of a water shortage, the Estero Municipal Improvement District would implement its Water Shortage Contingency Plan which outlines a suite of water demand reduction measures of varying severity designed to protect health and safety, minimize economic disruption, and preserve environmental and community assets.

Nonetheless, the City is vulnerable to regional supply constraints, especially as climate change increases the frequency of dry periods.

Given this dependency, continued participation in regional conservation programs, alternative supply planning, and demand management will be essential. The Estero Municipal Improvement District’s Urban Water Management Plan identifies the need for coordinated planning with regional partners and highlights the importance of preparing for worst-case drought scenarios. While recycled water is not currently used, it presents potential opportunities to supplement current and future water supplies and serve as an emergency backup option as climate risks evolve.

Climate Considerations
Climate change poses several risks to Foster City’s water infrastructure and management systems. Rising sea levels may compromise the lagoon’s drainage function, particularly during high tides or storm events. Higher average temperatures could increase lagoon evaporation and elevate potential for harmful algal blooms. This increased potential is driven by higher concentrations of contaminants and warmer water temperatures that promote algal growth, threatening habitat quality and recreational use. Additionally, altered precipitation patterns are expected to intensify stormwater runoff, potentially degrading lagoon water quality and overwhelming existing infrastructure. Groundwater rise is also projected to threaten buried infrastructure due to rising sea levels, leading to potential seawater intrusion, and contribute to inland flooding. Although the city is not dependent on groundwater as a water source, rising water tables could affect public utilities, natural open spaces, and impact natural and landscaped vegetation.

To proactively address these risks, Foster City can continue to implement targeted adaptation strategies such as strengthening of levees, improved lagoon circulation, shoreline wetland restoration, and

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

221

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 15
integration of green stormwater infrastructure. Proactive monitoring of groundwater conditions, in collaboration with regional agencies, will be critical for planning for future risks. Ensuring the continued function of the lagoon as both a flood control and ecological system will be essential in the face of climate variability and sea level rise.

Air Quality
Air quality in Foster City is significantly influenced by regional emissions, increasing wildfire smoke frequency due to climate change, and local traffic. The city currently lacks comprehensive, localized air quality monitoring infrastructure to track these impacts accurately and instead relies on nearby stations for data, which may not accurately reflect localized conditions. Indoor air quality trends in public buildings are also not well-documented, leaving gaps in understanding the full scope of exposure.

Emerging challenges for air quality in Foster City include increased wildfire smoke events, rising temperatures, and cumulative pollution from nearby urban centers. High temperatures can increase the formation of ground-level ozone, while inversions can trap pollutants close to the ground, leading to increased concentrations of harmful substances. Low-cost sensor deployment, improved building ventilation systems, and cumulative exposure mapping can better assess air quality risks. Coordinated efforts with Bay Area Air Quality Management District and regional grant programs may support these actions and contribute to healthier environments for vulnerable populations.

Energy Resources
Foster City has implemented a range of initiatives that provide a strong foundation for further opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy resilience through upgrades to its parks, public buildings, and community infrastructure. Existing municipal facilities, including - community centers powered by Peninsula Clean Energy’s 100 percent carbon-free electricity program, ECO100, can further reduce electricity use and light pollution through energy efficiency upgrades like LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and renewable-powered water management systems. In areas where conventional grid connections are costly or impractical, solar-powered lighting offers a low- maintenance, renewable solution. Energy conservation also supports broader climate and sustainability goals, particularly when paired with smart building materials and all-electric systems in future facility upgrades or new construction.

The City is also well-positioned to expand on-site renewable energy and support clean transportation infrastructure. The Foster City Library currently includes roof-mounted solar panels and a recent feasibility study identified other municipal buildings, such as the forthcoming recreation center, as viable sites for photovoltaic (PV) systems. These, along with potential solar canopies over parking lots or maintenance buildings, could be paired with battery storage to improve emergency preparedness and grid reliability. Parks and civic buildings are also key locations for expanding EV charging infrastructure, particularly through public-private partnerships. Education and community engagement will play a central role in cultivating support for these initiatives, using public spaces as platforms for demonstrations, signage, and workshops that promote energy literacy and sustainable living practices.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

222

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 16
Engagement Results for Conservation
During the development of the Conservation Element, residents shared priorities and perspectives on the natural resources and conservation strategies for Foster City through pop-up events, focus group discussions, a workshop, and a survey. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Community Priorities Survey
A critical component of community input was the Community Priorities Survey conducted in June 2025 via online questionnaire. The Foster City community expressed strong support for enhancing parks, trails, and natural spaces, with a focus on comfort, connectivity, and safety. Amenities such as restrooms, shade, seating, and wildlife viewing platforms were identified as top priorities for improving trail use. The Levee Pedway is frequently used by residents, and there is significant interest in expanding trail and bike lane connections. Conservation emerged as a clear community value, with most respondents rating it as very or extremely important and voicing strong support for rewilding efforts like native habitat restoration and pollinator-friendly landscaping. While enthusiasm for rewilding was high, some concerns were raised about pests, upkeep, and potential changes to recreational spaces.

Survey participants identified key environmental concerns, including sea level rise, storm flooding, water scarcity, and poor air quality. Residents placed a high value on open spaces that offer opportunities to connect with nature, support biodiversity, provide shade, and reduce climate-related risks. The most desired improvements included more walking and biking paths, increased tree cover, and restoring natural areas with native vegetation. There was also strong support for integrating green infrastructure, such as rain gardens and wetlands, and expanding educational features and access for all ages and abilities.

The community supported a wide range of strategies to protect open space and natural resources, including stronger zoning regulations, public-private partnerships, volunteer maintenance programs, and development incentives. Residents expressed a clear desire for the Foster City Lagoon to support both active and passive recreation, along with aesthetic and community uses. In terms of climate communication, respondents wanted more information on local flood risks, sea level rise, and ways to prepare for climate impacts. Overall, the results reflect a community that values nature, recognizes the urgency of climate adaptation, and is eager to engage in shaping a more sustainable and resilient future.

Community Engagement Takeaways
Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Support for Rewilding with Thoughtful Design

 There is strong community interest in rewilding efforts that restore native habitats, support pollinators, and enhance the ecological function of parks and open spaces.
 At the same time, many want these naturalized areas to be designed and maintained in ways that remain usable, safe, and visually appealing – balancing ecological goals with everyday recreation and comfort.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

223

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 17
 Concerns were raised about the potential to attract nuisance wildlife such as geese, as well as the need for clear upkeep and visibility. The feedback underscores a desire for rewilding that enhances, rather than limits, the public’s experience of open space.

Naturalized and Functional Open Spaces

 Community members want parks and open spaces to feel more ecologically rich while remaining comfortable and accessible, with amenities like shade, seating, and natural materials integrated into the landscape.
 There is interest in expanding tree cover and using native vegetation to provide cooling, habitat value, and a more natural aesthetic across the city’s open spaces.
 Some suggested that conservation-oriented spaces still need to accommodate daily use, such as keeping restrooms open longer and providing places to rest, so that naturalized areas remain welcoming and inclusive.

Concern for Climate Risks

 Sea level rise, stormwater flooding, water scarcity, and declining air quality were repeatedly raised as major concerns.
 Open space is seen as a critical tool for addressing climate impacts, offering functions like cooling, habitat protection, and stormwater infiltration.  Community members want more communication from the City about local flood risks, sea level rise adaptation, and practical steps households can take to prepare.

Sustainable Open Space

 There is strong backing for strategies like zoning protections, green infrastructure, and developer incentives that prioritize open space and ecological function.
 Volunteer programs and partnerships with local organizations are viewed as effective ways to support ongoing restoration and stewardship.  People value the Foster City Lagoon as a space for both active and passive recreation, and want it protected for future generations.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

224

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 18
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs
Biological Resources
Goal C-1 Natural habitat is protected and restored to support native biodiversity, improve ecological function, and enhance the resilience of open spaces.

Policy C-1.1 Wildlife Habitat. Protect and enhance Foster City’s existing habitats, including tidal wetlands, mudflats, and urban forests, to support native biodiversity and ecological health.

Policy C-1.2 Habitat Protection. Promote the restoration and naturalization of degraded or underutilized areas, particularly along the shoreline and coastal trails, through native vegetation planning and habitat enhancement.

Policy C-1.3 Support Biodiversity. Implement maintenance strategies that prioritize native vegetation and manage detrimental invasive plant and animal species in natural habitat areas. Allow non-native plants only if they support aesthetics or habitat without harming biodiversity. Select vegetation that attracts desirable species and discourages those that pose nuisance or ecological risks.

Goal C-2 Ecological connections between fragmented habitats are strengthened to facilitate wildlife movement, support species adaptation, and minimize the impacts of urban development on biodiversity.

Policy C-2.1 Habitat Connectivity. Improve connectivity between fragmented parks, shoreline areas, and natural spaces to support wildlife movement through restored corridors and green infrastructure.

Policy C-2.2 Wildlife Movement Design. Incorporate wildlife-friendly infrastructure, such as underpasses, vegetated buffers, and light controls into public infrastructure and land use planning.

Policy C-2.3 Movement Mitigation. Assess and mitigate barriers to wildlife movement caused by roads, levees, and urban development.

Policy C-2.4 Connectivity Partnerships. Coordinate with regional partners, including OneShoreline, to support connectivity and flood resilience through multi-benefit projects.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

225

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 19
Policy C-2.5 Habitat Improvements. Identify and prioritize habitat improvements that benefit migratory species, including birds and small mammals, in accordance with AB 1889.

Goal C-3 Foster City’s natural systems are resilient to the impacts of climate change.

Policy C-3.1 Climate Conscious Shoreline Management. Integrate sea level rise, flooding, and extreme weather considerations into shoreline habitat management and restoration.

Policy C-3.2 Nature-Based Solutions. Implement nature-based solutions, such as wetland buffers and marsh migration zones, to protect both ecological and human systems.

Policy C-3.3 Ecological Transitions. Support conservation strategies account for sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, and climate-driven shifts in habitat type, extent, and species composition.

Goal C-4 A community-wide ethic of environmental stewardship is fostered by engaging residents, regional partners, and organizations in the protection and enhancement of local natural resources.

Policy C-4.1 Public Awareness. Increase public awareness of urban wildlife, habitat conservation, and sustainable coexistence through education and outreach.

Policy C-4.2 Community Stewardship. Encourage community participation in habitat restoration, monitoring, and stewardship activities.

Policy C-4.3 Conservation Partnerships. Partner with regional agencies, nonprofits, and academic institutions to advance conservation and resilience objectives.

Water Resources
Goal C-5 Water resources are efficiently managed to support a sustainable, high-quality water supply for the community while promoting conservation, reducing demands, and protecting water systems from climate change.

Policy C-5.1 Water Quality Risk Prevention. Address water quality risks associated with climate change, including warming temperatures, increased turbidity, and the potential for algal blooms in the lagoon and stormwater systems.

Policy C-5.2 Water Quality Maintenance. Support ongoing maintenance and timely replacement of aging lagoon, stormwater, and water infrastructure to protect ecological function and recreational use.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

226

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 20
Policy C-5.3 Pollution Reduction. Improve lagoon circulation and implement pollution control measures to maintain water quality and mitigate contamination from urban runoff and other sources.

Policy C-5.4 Water Quality Programing. Expand participation in regional water quality programs, including the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program, to better manage stormwater runoff and protect the San Francisco Bay.

Policy C-5.5 Water Quality Monitoring. Incorporate regular monitoring and public reporting of water quality conditions into city operations to support data- driven decision-making and transparency.

Goal C-6 Foster City maintains a secure and sustainable water supply to support current and future community needs.

Policy C-6.1 Water Reliability. Collaborate with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to improve long-term water reliability, conservation strategies, and demand forecasting, especially under future drought conditions.

Policy C-6.2 Supplemental Water Supply. Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to explore alternative or supplemental water supply options and regularly update reliability assessments in response to climate trends.

Policy C-6.3 Water Neutrality. Implement and enforce the 2023 Water Neutrality Ordinance so that new development and redevelopment do not increase overall water demand.

Policy C-6.4 Water Conservation. Integrate water conservation, reuse, and efficiency measures into new development, infrastructure upgrades, and public education initiatives.

Air Quality
Goal C-7 Foster City is a healthy and climate-resilient community through reduced air pollution and improved air quality.

Policy C-7.1 Land Use Alignment. Align Foster City’s land use, transportation, and development decisions with air quality thresholds and best practices established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Policy C-7.2 Air Quality Mitigation. Incorporate air quality mitigation strategies into land use planning by requiring vegetative buffers, enhanced filtration systems, and site design strategies to reduce exposure near major transportation corridors and pollution sources.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

227

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 21
Policy C-7.3 Complete Streets. Encourage smart growth and complete streets principles that integrate air quality protection measures, such as shade trees and green infrastructure.

Policy C-7.4 VMT Reduction. Prioritize transportation and mobility improvements that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and emissions, including expansion of pedestrian, bicycle, and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure.

Policy C-7.5 Regional Air Quality Coordination. Enhance regional coordination and compliance with BAAQMD programs and participate in local implementation of Spare the Air and other outreach initiatives.

Goal C-8 Foster City’s neighborhoods are healthy, resilient, and equitable, with clean air and access to green spaces for all residents.

Policy C-8.1 Greening Air Improvements. Expand urban greening strategies that improve air quality and reduce urban heat, including targeted tree canopy expansion and the use of vegetated buffers in high-exposure areas.

Policy C-8.2 Tree City. Pursue Tree City USA designation and adopt a citywide tree ordinance that guides planting, removal, and long-term care of public trees, with a focus on air quality and shade equity.

Policy C-8.3 Air Quality Co-Benefits. Design public parks and open spaces to maximize air quality benefits while supporting climate adaptation and equitable access to green space.

Policy C-8.4 Air Quality Engagement. Promote public awareness and engagement on air quality topics through education programs, signage, and collaboration with regional partners.

Energy Resources
Goal C-9 Foster City’s public facilities and infrastructure operate sustainably with low-energy use and resilient systems that support a clean and climate-ready future.

Policy C-9.1 Improved Energy Efficiency. Improve energy efficiency in parks, public buildings, and community centers through lighting upgrades, smart controls, and design strategies that reduce both electricity consumption and light pollution.

Policy C-9.2 Renewable Energy Expansion. Expand the use of on-site renewable energy systems, particularly photovoltaic (PV) installations and battery storage, on City-owned facilities where cost-effective.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

228

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 22
Policy C-9.3 EV Charging. Support the installation of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations in public parks, community centers, and City parking lots to enable a transition to clean transportation.

Policy C-9.4 Low-Carbon Construction. Promote all-electric systems and low-carbon construction practices in the design and retrofit of new municipal facilities.

Policy C-9.5 Energy Outreach. Use public spaces, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, as platforms for energy-related education, outreach, and engagement.

Policy C-9.6 Energy Efficiency in Green Infrastructure. Integrate energy efficiency and renewable energy into green infrastructure projects to enhance co- benefits for climate resilience, water conservation, and long-term cost savings.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

229

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 23
Implementation Programs
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-a Explore opportunities for habitat restoration and naturalization within the existing parks system through the following steps:
 Assess and map high-potential sites (e.g., degraded park edges, canal embankments, underutilized shoreline areas);
 Integrate habitat strategies into the next Parks Master Plan update or as part of implementation actions;
 Develop guidance for incorporating native habitat elements into future park renovations, new park development, and routine maintenance; and  Coordinate with restoration partners, schools, and community groups for implementation and stewardship.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2,
C-1.3
C-b Seek funding for a long-term maintenance plan for restored and naturalized habitat areas that includes seasonal invasive species removal, native plant reestablishment, irrigation reduction, and trash/debris removal. Consider pilot programs with community stewardship groups to assist with hands-on maintenance and monitoring.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2
C-c Design and introduce educational signage at key natural areas (e.g., Belmont Slough, shoreline parks) with clear, engaging content about native ecosystems, local wildlife, and restoration goals. Include multilingual content, maps, and QR codes linking to informational websites. Encourage stewardship behaviors through signage, like staying on trails and avoiding disturbance of wildlife.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-1.3
C-d Continue to explore suitable levee-adjacent zones to retrofit with ecotone features that support both flood protection and habitat enhancement. Engage with OneShoreline, regional restoration partners, and permitting agencies to align with long-term sea level rise adaptation planning and pursue funding for design and implementation.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.3

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

230

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 24
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-e Explore opportunities to better understand and improve ecological connectivity across the city. This may include studying ecological connectivity and mapping of habitat patches, identifying barriers (e.g., roads, fences, lighting), and evaluating where enhancements could support multi-species movement, especially along Belmont Slough, lagoon edges, and gaps between open spaces. Where feasible, consider coordination with regional experts and agencies to assess general habitat needs and potential improvements over time.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.2,
C-2.3, C-2.5 C-f Encourage the inclusion of wildlife-supportive features into infrastructure and discretionary development projects where appropriate. These features may include safe road crossings, native vegetative buffers, wildlife-friendly fencing, down-shielded lighting, and mitigation measures for existing barriers.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Ongoing C-2.2, C-2.3,
C-2.5
C-g Assess local habitat mitigation opportunities (e.g., offsetting development impacts) and create a grant funding strategy targeting AB 1889, Wildlife Conservation Board, and Proposition 1 programs. Design packaged projects with detailed scopes, cost estimates, and co-benefits to enhance competitiveness for funding.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.5
C-h Coordinate with OneShoreline, San Mateo Resource Conservation District, nonprofit organizations, and research institutions on joint grant applications, technical studies, and pilot projects that advance shared conservation goals, consistent with this Conservation Element.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-4.3
C-i Enhance the City’s water quality monitoring program to include indicators influenced by climate change, such as water temperature, turbidity, algal growth, and bacteria levels. Encourage the installation of real-time sensors at key locations in the lagoon system and stormwater outfalls, and use this data to inform water quality advisories, infrastructure upgrades, and restoration planning.

Public Works Mid-term C-5.1
C-j Consider capital improvement project phasing to minimize disruption and align with sea level rise adaptation efforts.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-5.2

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

231

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 25
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-k Continue to implement targeted strategies to reduce non-point source pollution, such as installing pet waste stations in parks, increasing street sweeping near outfalls, and adding trash capture devices in key storm drains.

Coordinate these efforts with the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan to reduce the impacts of the goose population on water quality. Seek to pair these efforts with a multilingual public education campaign on pollution prevention, lagoon protection, and green infrastructure.

Parks and
Recreation/Pu
blic Works
Community Development Ongoing C-5.3
C-l Support increased City participation in regional water quality initiatives, such as the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program. Identify City staff to represent Foster City in interagency meetings and explore co- funding or joint implementation of stormwater retrofits.

Public Works Community Development Mid-term C-5.4
C-m Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District to explore use of alternative water sources such as greywater or direct potable reuse to support the city’s long-term water reliability and sustainability goals.

Public
Works/Commu
nity
Development
Long-term C-6.2
C-n Explore additional opportunities to establish partnerships with local and regional agencies and organizations to develop a public outreach campaign to increase awareness of existing water conservation programs and provide education on water conservation, targeting residents, schools, and businesses.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-6.4
C-o Develop a set of planning and design guidelines for locating sensitive land uses (e.g., schools, senior housing) near high-traffic roadways. The guidelines should recommend best practices such as building orientation, MERV-13 or higher HVAC filtration, vegetated screening, and site layout strategies to reduce pollutant exposure. Integrate these standards into development review and environmental review processes where feasible.

Community
Development
Public Works Mid-term C-7.1, C-7.2
C-p As part of future maintenance projects, identify opportunities to install vegetative buffers, such as hedgerows, or bioswales between roads and sensitive land uses. Prioritize high-performing vegetation species suited to pollution absorption and local climate when installing new landscaping in these areas.

Public Works Community Development Ongoing C-7.2, C-7.3

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

232

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 26
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-q Review and enhance the City’s Complete Streets and public realm guidelines to include stormwater planters, permeable paving, and native landscaping as standard components of street design to support air quality, active transportation, and neighborhood cooling, particularly in areas with higher pollution exposure.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-5.1, C-5.3, C-7.3, C-7.4
C-r Support ongoing coordination with BAAQMD to help keep the City’s plans and policies generally align with regional air quality standards and emission reduction targets. Participate in updates to the Clean Air Plan and pursue grant funding to implement local air quality improvement projects.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Annual C-7.5
C-s Conduct a tree inventory and prioritize new plantings near schools and major roads where vegetation can mitigate air quality and urban heat impacts.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-8.1, C-8.3
C-t Pursue the development of a tree ordinance that governs planting, maintenance, and removal of City-owned and potentially private trees, including a permit system, replacement ratios, and performance standards.

Align ordinance goals with air quality, climate, and equity outcomes.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Short-term C-8.2
C-u As part of future updates to the Climate Action Plan, update audits of energy use in existing municipal buildings to evaluate efficacy of energy conservation measures. Implement upgrades such as LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and smart ventilation and irrigation systems in buildings, restrooms, pathways, and sports facilities.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Mid-term C-9.1, C-9.6
C-v Advance photovoltaic installations at City-owned buildings and parking lots based on the recent feasibility study, beginning with priority sites like the Library/Community Center and planned Recreation Center. Explore solar canopies over large, paved areas and pair installations with battery storage for emergency backup and energy cost optimization.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.2, C-9.6
C-w Identify opportunities to install EV charging stations at high-traffic public facilities such as community centers, parks, and libraries that are accessible to all residents.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.3
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Cons Element - Final Clean Version

233

EXHIBIT B
Conservation Element Legislative Consistency Checklist
Government Code Section Description of Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code,
§§ 65302(d)(1), 65352.5
The Conservation Element
must plan for the
conservation, sustainable
development, and utilization
of water resources,
including their hydraulic
force and role in ecological
systems.

Addressed The Element discusses Foster City’s lagoon
and stormwater systems, regional water
supply (Hetch Hetchy via EMID),
groundwater vulnerability, and flood control
levees. Goals C-5 and C-6, and programs C-
i through C-n, specifically address water
quality, water supply reliability, conservation,
and hydraulic risks.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(3) The Conservation Element
must provide strategies to
conserve and accommodate
floodwaters, including
watershed management,
stormwater retention, and
groundwater recharge.

Addressed The Element identifies the lagoon and bay
as floodwater accommodation for the city.

Goals C-3 and C-5 highlight sea level rise,
flood risk adaptation, and stormwater
infrastructure planning (Programs C-d, C-j,
C-q).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve forest
resources and manage
them for sustainability,
including coordination with
wildfire risk reduction and
carbon sequestration goals.

Addressed While Foster City does not have traditional
forests, the Element treats its urban forest as
a conservation resource. Policies C-1.1, C-

1.2, and Goal C-8 (Tree City ordinance, tree
canopy expansion) emphasize ecological
and air quality functions of tree cover.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must promote the
responsible use and
conservation of soils,
addressing agricultural
productivity, erosion control,
and protection of prime
farmland.

Addressed The Element addresses erosion indirectly via
shoreline stabilization, wetland restoration,
and ecotone design (Goal C-3, Program C-
d). While Foster City is highly urbanized, soil
stability and shoreline resilience are
considered under climate and flood planning.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve and protect
rivers, streams, wetlands,
and other waters by
addressing watershed
protection, water quality,
and ecological function.

Addressed Covers lagoon system, Belmont and Seal
Slough, and San Francisco Bay shoreline.

Policies C-5.3–C-5.5 and Programs C-i
through C-l address water quality,
stormwater pollution reduction, and habitat
functions of these waters.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must provide for the
conservation and planned
use of harbors and
associated coastal
resources to support
commerce, recreation, and
environmental quality.

Not Applicable Foster City does not contain harbors; only lagoons and shoreline recreation.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must support the
conservation and
sustainable use of fisheries,
including aquatic habitat
protection and long-term
viability of fish populations.

Not Applicable Foster City does not have commercial
fisheries.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve wildlife and
their habitats, ensuring
biodiversity, ecological
connectivity, and protection
of sensitive species.

Addressed Extensive coverage in narrative, as well as
Goals C-1 and C-2, Policies C-1.1–C-2.5,
and Programs C-a–C-g, which emphasize
habitat protection, restoration, biodiversity,
wildlife movement, and AB 1889 compliance.

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit B Cons Element - Legislative Consistency Checklist

234

Government Code Section Description of Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must inventory, protect, and
manage mineral resources,
including guiding extraction
and reclamation consistent
with State mapping and
conservation policies.

Not Applicable No mineral resources identified in Foster City.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must consider and provide
policies for the conservation
of other locally significant
natural resources, such as
geothermal, scenic, or
unique ecological features.

Addressed Energy, air quality, and cultural/tribal
resources are included. Policies C-7.1
through C-9.6 address air, energy, and
climate resilience.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Reclamation of land and
waters (optional)
Addressed The Element acknowledges Foster City’s
history of reclaimed marshland and
emphasizes ongoing shoreline restoration
and rewilding strategies (Background:

Biological Resources; Policies C-1.2, C-3.2;
Program C-a).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Pollution of streams and
other waters (optional)
Addressed The Element includes lagoon water quality
challenges, stormwater management, and
regional compliance. Policies C-5.3–C-5.5
and Programs C-k, C-l directly address water
pollution prevention.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Land use in stream
channels and other areas
(optional)
Addressed Policies C-2.1, C-2.2, and Program C-o
incorporate land use and infrastructure
planning near waterways, balancing
ecological and recreational functions.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Erosion (optional) Addressed The Element discusses shoreline erosion and wetland migration constraints. Programs
C-d (levee ecotone retrofits) and C-j
(phasing infrastructure to reduce impacts)
address erosion.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Protection of watersheds
(optional)
Addressed Watershed protection measures appear in
coordination with RWQCB, stormwater
pollution prevention, and green infrastructure
planning (Policies C-5.4, C-5.5; Programs C-
l, C-q).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Rock, sand, and gravel
resources (optional)
Not Applicable No local deposits identified.

AB 1889 (2024) – Gov.

Code §65302(d), §65302(e)
Requires updates to the
conservation element of the
general plan to address
wildlife movement and
habitat connectivity. This
includes identifying and
analyzing connectivity areas
and existing or planned
wildlife passage features, as
well as implementing
measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate
barriers to wildlife
movement.

Addressed Fully integrated – Background includes
wildlife connectivity mapping; Goals C-2 and
Policies C-2.1–C-2.5 specifically align with
AB 1889. Programs C-e through C-g commit
to mapping corridors, incorporating wildlife-
friendly design, and pursuing funding

7.1 Attachment 2 - Exhibit B Cons Element - Legislative Consistency Checklist

235

DRAFT REDLINE
Parks and Open Space Introduction
Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 1
Parks and Open Space Introduction
Boardwalk along the Foster City Lagoon near Leo J. Ryan Park, a central open space known for its scenic waterfront and community gathering areas Foster City, 2025.

Purpo
se
The Parks and Open Space Element fulfills the State’s requirements for an Open Space Element while also establishing Foster City’s vision for how its natural and recreational areas, including parks, natural open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enriched.

The Parks and Open Space Element leverages the city’s parks and open space areas as a vital framework for community well-being and natural stewardship. It guides the use of parks and open spaces for recreation, social connection, and enrichment, and plays a role in building resilience to natural hazards such as flooding and extreme heat. By weaving these aspects together, the City can enhance livability for all residents and foster deeper relationships with Foster City’s natural environment.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key trends related to parks, open space, and recreation. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for parks, open space, and recreation. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

236

DRAFT REDLINE
Parks and Open Space Introduction
Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 2
Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

Wh
ile these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Legal Requirements
The Parks and Open Space Element of the General Plan is guided by state law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, promote ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(e) – Open Space Element Requirements
California Government Code §65302(e) requires all general plans to include an Open Space Element that addresses the long-term preservation of open space lands. This includes open space for natural resource protection, outdoor recreation, hazard mitigation (such as flood and fire zones), and the production of resources like agriculture. Additional considerations include open space that supports military readiness or protects tribal resources.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

237

DRAFT REDLINE
Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 3
Quimby Act
Government Code §66477, known as the Quimby Act, allows cities and counties to require residential subdivisions to dedicate land or pay in-lieu fees for park and recreational purposes. These dedications or fees are then used to fund new park and open space development in consideration of population growth necessitating additional public open spaces.

Public Park Preservation Act
The Public Park Preservation Act (§5400–§5409) restricts the sale, lease, or disposal of public parkland unless a replacement of equivalent size and function is provided. This protects publicly accessible parks from being converted to non-recreational uses without due process and community benefit.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of open spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities. The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Parks and Open Space Element must be aligned with regional priorities and local planning efforts. On the regional scale, open space planning is often coordinated through countywide or multi-jurisdictional strategies. For Foster City, relevant partners include OneShoreline, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), each of which plays a role in guiding land use and resource conservation within the San Francisco Bay Area. These agencies provide policy guidance and mapping resources that help local governments identify priority areas for natural infrastructure, shoreline buffers, habitat corridors, and sea level rise adaptation.

At the local level, the Parks and Open Space Element provides the overarching vision implemented by Foster City’s Parks Master Plan and Capital Improvement Program. These documents identify specific opportunities for acquiring, improving, and maintaining parks and recreational spaces in alignment with the vision of the Parks and Open Space Element. The Element also integrates the City’s broader environmental goals, such as climate resilience, stormwater management, and habitat restoration by incorporating nature-based solutions and equitable access principles into the design and stewardship of

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

238

DRAFT REDLINE
Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 4
open spaces. The alignment between regional frameworks and local initiatives ensures that Foster City’s open space planning supports both community priorities and broader environmental sustainability goals.

Several local and regional plans and programs provide additional guidance and are referenced throughout this Element. Brief descriptions are provided below to give context when these plans are mentioned.
• The Parks Master Plan was developed concurrently with this Element, the Parks Master Plan provides a detailed systemwide analysis of park conditions, recreational needs, and community priorities. It includes site-specific recommendations, amenity standards, and an implementation strategy to guide future investments.
• The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies, prioritizes, and funds infrastructure projects, including park and open space improvements.
• The Lagoon Management Plan provides policies and actions for long-term stewardship pf the City’s lagoon system, including water quality monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The Plan also addresses ecological concerns such as runoff, algal blooms, and wildlife impacts, ensuring the lagoon remains a safe, healthy, and enjoyable resource for recreation and habitat. • The Integrated Canada Goose Population Management Plan establishes strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreational use. This plan complements the Lagoon Management Plan by addressing a major source of non-point pollution and nuisance conditions. • The Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan (2026) will guide the creation of a connected network of trails and bikeways that link parks, open spaces, neighborhoods, and the Levee Pedway. The Plan will aim to support active transportation, recreation, and access to natural areas.

Relationship to the Foster City Parks Master Plan
The update to the Parks and Open Space Element was developed concurrently with the 2025 Parks Master Plan. These two documents are closely linked; the Parks and Open Space Element establishes a citywide vision and high-level framework to guide the planning, development, and stewardship of Foster City’s parks, recreational facilities, and open space resources. As shown in Figure 1, the Parks Master Plan builds on this foundation with a more detailed assessment of community needs and priorities. The Parks Master Plan includes specific recommendations and an implementation strategy to help realize the City's long-term vision and ensure that parks and open spaces continue to support both ecological functions and community well-being.

Because these efforts were conducted in parallel, much of the detailed community engagement and needs assessment from the Parks Master Plan has been integrated into this Element, further strengthening its vision and policy framework for the future of parks and open space in Foster City.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

239

DRAFT REDLINE
Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 5
Figure 1 Relationship Between the Parks and Open Space Element and the Parks Master Plan

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

240

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 6
Background
The update process for the Parks and Open Space Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions, featuring both a systemwide analysis that covered level of service, access, connectivity, usage, and amenities, as well as detailed evaluations of individual park sites. As shown in Figure 2, extensive community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan, ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of both the Parks Master Plan and this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Parks and Open Space Element.

Figure 2 Community Engagement Overview

*Note: The Parks & Open Space Workshop was held in conjunction with the Park Master Plan’s second workshop.

Parks and Open Space Focus Groups will be conducted in August of 2025, and number engaged subsequently added.

Parks and Open Space System
Parks
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 3, Foster City has approximately 133 113 acres of publicly accessible parks and open spaces that shape the city’s recreational and ecological landscape. Many of these spaces are notable for features such as well-maintained landscaping, lagoon and bayfront views, shaded picnic areas, and family-friendly playgrounds that encourage regular use. The city is anchored by four large community parks, Leo J. Ryan Park, Sea Cloud Park, Boothbay Park, and Edgewater Park, which offer a wide range of amenities such as sports fields and courts, playgrounds, and group picnic areas that attract diverse users from across the community. Leo J. Ryan Park serves as a hub for major community events and is the site of Foster City’s new community center. The center will offer flexible spaces and upgraded amenities to better serve residents’ needs.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

241

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 7
In addition to community parks, Foster City is home to a network of smaller neighborhood and mini parks nestled within residential areas. These parks provide everyday recreational opportunities and are designed to meet the specific needs of nearby residents. The city also includes three special-use parks dedicated to unique recreational activities such as windsurfing and dog play.

Foster City’s park system includes large community parks like Sea Cloud Park (left), popular neighborhood parks like Catamaran (middle) and mini parks that serve local needs, like Ketch Park (right).

Open Space
Foster City contains a diverse range of open spaces that enhance environmental quality and provide recreational and ecological value. In addition to the 24 parks, the city includes approximately 22 acres of publicly accessible open space along trails and 41 acres of open space with restricted access, much of which consists of sensitive habitat along the levee system and protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Public access is generally discouraged as these areas consist of sensitive habitat along the levee pedway. The shorelines along the Belmont Slough are protected as a part of the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. The CDFW oversees the ecological health and wildlife protection in the area. Natural areas like the Belmont Slough offer scenic trails and habitat for wildlife, and the city features the Foster City Lagoon, described further below. The lagoon primarily supports drainage and water-based recreation, and has some ecological value.

Water Bodies
The Foster City Lagoon is a major recreational and ecological feature and is central to the community’s identity. The Lagoon covers approximately 218 acres, holding approximately 1,300 acre-feet of water, and winds through several neighborhoods in Foster City, fronting many of the City’s parks and open spaces. Residents engage in water-based recreational activities such as kayaking, paddling, and boating, and the Lagoon is central to many Foster City community events. Water testing in the lagoon has detected avian DNA, and while the lagoon supports a large Canada Geese population, the results cannot be traced specifically to geese or to any single location. Nevertheless, the presence of Canada Geese contributes to ongoing challenges with cleanliness and maintenance. Outside of designated beach areas, water quality is generally similar to bay water. Poor water quality and an abundant Canadian Geese population has created maintenance and operations challenges for the City and has discouraged recreational use of the Lagoon.

Just as important, the San Francisco Bay creates an enhanced experience for people using the Levee Pedway and Bay-adjacent parks such as Baywinds, Gateshead, Shorebird, and Bridgeview. The San Francisco Bay is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

242

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 8
the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. The Bay also offers a wide range of recreational opportunities, including kayaking, sailing, birdwatching, and waterfront trails, making it a vital natural and cultural resource that connects communities to the region’s environmental heritage while promoting outdoor access and stewardship.

The Foster City Lagoon (left and middle) and the San Franscico Bay are important recreational assets in the community.

Trails
Wrapping around the perimeter of Foster City’s waterfront edge is the Levee Pedway. This multi-use pathway is a segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail, and serves as a recreational asset for people walking, jogging, and biking. The trail runs past several parks and open spaces while also providing a continuous path without requiring on-street travel. In addition to the Levee Pedway, neighborhood trails provide local connections throughout Foster City. The Levee Pedway and other trails in Foster City are managed by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, which oversees maintenance and improvements to ensure support safe, accessible routes for walking, biking, and recreation.

The Levee Pedway (left and middle) is a heavily-used regional route that is supported by the City’s local neighborhood trails (right, source: Google Streetview).

Table 1 Parks and Open Space Inventory
Park Number Acres Major Amenities
Community Parks 4 64.7
Boothbay 11.2 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Volleyball Court, Restroom, Picnic Shelter, BBQ
Edgewater 8.5 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Leo J. Ryan 20.7 Basketball Court, Pickleball Courts, Bocce Ball Courts, Tennis Courts, Beach, Boat Launch, Parking Lot

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

243

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 9
Park Number Acres Major Amenities
Sea Cloud 24 Playground, Ballfields, Soccer/Multipurpose Fields, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Neighborhood Parks 10 34.9 33.7
Catamaran 5.9 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Court, Volleyball Courts, Restroom
Erckenbrack 3.5 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Farragut 3.9 Playground, Restroom
Gull 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Kildeer 2.4 Playground
Marlin 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Port Royal 4.0 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Restroom, Parking Lot
Pilgrim Triton* 1.2 Playground, Picnic Area
Shad 2.1 Playground, Basketball Court, Restroom
Shorebird 3.5 Restroom
Sunfish 2.4 Playground, Basketball Court,
Mini Parks 6 8 5.7 7.5

Arcturus 0.75 0.8 Playground
Gateshead 0.1 0.7 None
Ketch 1.6 Playground, Basketball Court
Leo 0.015 0.1 None
Pompano 0.5 None
Turnstone 1.5 Playground, Basketball Court,
Town Center Park* 1.1 None
Pilgrim Triton* 1.2 Playground, Picnic Area
Special Use Parks 3 7.7
Bridgeview 3.2 Restroom, Parking Lot
Baywinds 1.3 Restroom, Shower, BBQ
Boat/Dog 3.2 Restroom, Boat Launch, Dog Park, Parking Lot Subtotal, Parks 23 25 2.9 113.6
Open Space

63 Publicly Accessible Open Space

22 Restricted Access Open Space

41 Lagoon

218

*Pilgrim Triton and Town Center Park are private parks, but are publicly accessible.

Source: City of Foster City 2025.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

244

DRAFT REDLINE
Background
Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 10
Figure 3 Foster City Parks & Open Spaces
Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

245

DRAFT REDLINE
Background
Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 11
Park Access
As shown in Figure 4, all of Foster City’s residential neighborhoods are within a 10-minute walk of a park, an aspirational standard that many cities struggle to achieve. While there are portions of the City that are beyond a 10-minute walk from a park, these are primarily employment areas.

Demographic patterns offer insight into how park access and recreational resources can best serve the community. In central Foster City, particularly along the Foster City Boulevard corridor, a larger population of older adults (65 and over) presents an opportunity to enhance amenities and programs that support seniors. Youth, by contrast, are more evenly spread throughout the city, although central neighborhoods overall tend to have the highest population density. Park access is generally well- distributed across all racial and income groups. While Foster City’s population is predominantly Asian and/or White, there are no distinct clusters of culturally specific communities that would require targeted outreach or specialized facilities.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

246

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 12
Figure 4 Foster City Park Walksheds

Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

247

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 13
Park Acreage
Park acreage level of service (LOS) measures the availability of parks and recreational facilities relative to a community’s population, helping ensure promote equitable access and adequate resources. As shown in Table 2, Fo ster City currently offers 3.2 acres o f developed park land per 1,000 residents, which is somewhat higher than the average of similar local communities. Given Foster City residents’ strong park access and general satisfaction with the overall amount of parkland, the Parks and Open Space Element recommends establishing the current ratio of 3.2 acres per 1,000 residents as a standard. Based on projected population growth, meeting this standard would require an additional 12.9 acres of parkland by 2040. The Parks and Open Space Element recommends maintaining the existing developed parkland acreage of 113.6 acres. The City could explore adding additional parkland by exploring conversion of Sea Cloud II site, as discussed in detail below (see Opportunity Sites). It shall be noted that the LOS in 2040 with additional growth and without additional parkland would be 2.9.

As Foster City grows, the Parks and Open Space Element also recommends establishing an appropriate LOS balances future housing and community preference.

Table 2 Park Acreage Level of Service
City Acres
Publicly
Accessible
Private Acres Total Acres
Current Level of
Service (LOS)
(acres/1000
residents)
Local Average
LOS1 (acres/1000
residents)
Parks 110.6 2.3 112.9 113.6 3.2 2.8
Open Space 22.0 0 22.0 0.6 NA
Grand Total 132.6 2.3 134.9 135. 6 3.8 NA

1. Average level of service for comparable Bay Area communities (Belmont, Burlingame, Menlo Park, Millbrae, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco). Source: Parks Master Plan Benchmark Analysis.

Source: WRT and City of Foster City, 2024.

Recreation Amenities
Table 3 summarizes the inventory of recreation amenities in Foster City’s parks, indicates existing level of service for these amenities, and establishes recreation amenity standards based on local and national trends, as well as Foster City’s unique needs. Foster City provides a high level of service for most major recreational amenities, particularly multi-use fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and playgrounds. By 2040, additional amenities needed to meet projected demand include at least four pickleball courts, one volleyball court, and four reservable picnic shelters. This analysis focuses on traditional park amenities commonly tracked by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). However, it does not capture other important community needs, such as trails, shade trees, walking paths within parks, community gardens, and more, which were highlighted through community engagement (see Engagement Results for Parks & Open Space).

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

248

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 14
Table 3 Park Recreation Amenity Level of Service
Amenity Inventory
Current LOS
(pop. per
amenity)
Local
Average
LOS 1
(pop. per
amenity)
National
Average
LOS
(pop. per
amenity) 2
Priority
Investment
Rating
(PIR)3
LOS
Standard
(pop. per
amenity)
2040
Additional
Amenities
Needed
Diamond Field 10 3,500 4,878 3,007 Low 4,000 0
Soccer
Multipurpose
Field
12 2,917 8,212 3,333 Low 4,000 0
Basketball Court 8 4,376 7,294 7,501 Low 7,000 0
Tennis Court 13 2,693 6,151 5,461 Medium 4,000 0
Pickleball Court 6 5,834 9,124 7,737 Medium 4,000 4
Bocce Ball Court 4 8,751 N/A N/A Low 9,000 0
Volleyball Court 2 17,502 N/A 14,280 Medium 15,000 1
Dog Park 1 35,004 31,087 27,508 Medium 30,000 0
Playgrounds 15 2,334 3,973 3,105 Low 3,500 0
Reservable Picnic
Tables
3 11,668 6,572 N/A Medium/
High
6,000 4
1 Average level of service for comparable Bay Area communities (Belmont, Burlingame, Menlo Park, Millbrae, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco). Source: Parks Master Plan Benchmark Analysis. 2 For agencies serving communities of between 20,000 and 49,999 residents. Source: National Recreation and Park Association, 2024. 3 Priority Investment Rating is an index score based on residents’ level of unmet need and level of importance for each amenity. Source:

Parks Master Plan Community Survey, 2024
Park Use
A park usage analysis was also conducted based on data from Placer.ai and revealed how amenities and user demographics influence visitation patterns, offering insights that can guide future planning, investment, and improvements in Foster City’s parks.1
Catering to Residents and Visitors
Foster City parks primarily cater to residents. However, parks like Baywinds Park and Leo J. Ryan Park attract significant non-resident visitation and have the potential for cost recovery opportunities through user fees, equipment rentals, or other strategies. Other parks with desirable recreation amenities, like Sea Cloud, may also have potential to be leveraged for more cost recovery.

Extending Use
Lighting and shade play a role in shaping park usage patterns, both seasonally and throughout the day.

Enhanced lighting can extend usability into evening hours while being designed to not disturb surrounding residential areas. Adding shade trees and structures could also improve comfort and attract

1 PlacerAI is an analytics platform that leverages anonymous mobile location data to analyze how people move through and interact with different spaces.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

249

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 15
more users during peak sunlight. These upgrades could also promote greater year-round accessibility and enjoyment of parks.

Understanding Park Users
Foster City’s parks should reflect the diversity of the community and the varying ways residents engage with outdoor spaces. Young adults, Hispanic/Latino families, and households with lower to moderate incomes tend to use parks frequently, while seniors, middle-aged adults, and Asian residents, who make up the city’s largest demographic group, appear less represented in park use. 2 These patterns point to
opportunities to broaden the appeal of Foster City’s parks by ensuring amenities remain affordable and accessible, offering culturally inclusive programs, improving language access, and enhancing park features that meet the needs of all residents.

Park Site Assessment

Foster City Parks are safe, well -maintained and have diverse recreational amenities , though key challenges include Geese habitation and lack of comfort amenities.

Foster City parks were evaluated for access, safety, functionality, and condition. Each park was considered from the perspective of strengths and areas for improvement. Stunning waterfront views at Leo J. Ryan Park and the variety of diverse activities at Sea Cloud Park make those parks attractive destinations for local and regional community members. The park system also faces challenges, including geese droppings particularly at parks with access to the lagoon, and a lack of signage and pathways at parks like Edgewater and Pompano parks. Strengths and challenges are summarized below.

2 It should be noted that visitor demographic data is inferred based on a visitor’s census block group, providing insights into the demographic composition of neighborhoods rather than the specific traits of individual users.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

250

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 16

Opportunity Sites
Foster City is a nearly built-out community with a well-distributed park system and relatively limited undeveloped open space areas. Foster City’s greatest opportunities to expand recreation opportunities lie in enhancing existing parks and facilities. However, two key sites, Sea Cloud II and the Baywinds area, present unique opportunities to introduce new public open spaces that may both provide additional recreational value and also support multiple ecological and resiliency benefits.

Sea Cloud II Site
Adjacent to Sea Cloud Park lies a 21-acre, City-owned open space known as Sea Cloud II, shown in Figure 5. Designated by the Army Corps of Engineers as a dredge material deposit site in 2018, the area has since evolved into a seasonal retention basin and wetland, supporting a mix of natural and invasive vegetation. In recent years, protected bird species have been observed nesting on-site, highlighting the ecological significance of the area and the importance of thoughtful stewardship. Currently fenced off and inaccessible to the public, the site also lacks direct connectivity to Sea Cloud Park and the Bay Trail.

With further study, community visioning, and targeted improvements, it has the potential to become a valuable ecological resource and a passive recreation asset.

Due to the potential presence of wetland and sensitive habitat areas on portions of the site, the scope of potential improvements is not yet fully known. Additional environmental analysis and close coordination with State and regional regulatory agencies will be necessary to clarify the site’s constraints and opportunities. With that understanding, the City could develop a long-term vision that protects and enhances the site's natural features while improving connectivity to the Bay Trail and potentially introducing low-impact recreational amenities such as wildlife viewing, nature exploration, and picnicking.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

251

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 17
Figure 5 Sea Cloud II Site Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation including elevated boardwalk, wildlife viewing areas, and docks.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

252

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 18
Baywinds Park
At just 1.3 acres, Baywinds Park is one of Foster City’s smallest parks, tucked into the northwestern edge of the city along the Bay. The park is popular for windsurfing and attracts people from around the region for that activity. However, the surrounding properties include extensive wetlands, open space, and recreational assets, most notably the 25-acre Mariners Point Golf Center and Driving Range and approximately 25 acres of Caltrans-owned undeveloped land including wetlands. Together, these sites (shown in Figure 6) present a unique opportunity to create a more integrated, nature-focused recreation destination that could support habitat restoration, wildlife viewing, environmental education, picnicking, and other passive uses.

The Mariners Point Golf Center is a valued recreational amenity, currently leased by the City and the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to a private operator. While the long-term vision for the site has not yet been determined, its future use could significantly influence the area’s recreational potential. If the golf course remains indefinitely, improvements could enhance connectivity with Baywinds Park and surrounding open space. If the site is ever repurposed, there may be an opportunity to expand parkland, restore natural habitat, or introduce other recreational facilities.

The Caltrans-owned parcels also represent a strategic opportunity. The City may pursue partnerships or acquisition opportunities that would support site improvements, habitat restoration, and expanded public access.

Figure 6 Baywinds Park Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation, including a board walk, nature center, and relaxation areas.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

253

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 19
Engagement Results for Parks & Open Space
During the planning process, hundreds of residents shared their insights on the parks and open space system through a variety of engagement opportunities, including workshops, pop-up events, surveys, focus groups, and more. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Parks Master Plan Community Survey
A strong indicator of community preferences came from the Parks Master Plan Community Survey, conducted by ETC Institute in winter 2024–2025 through a mailed and online questionnaire sent to a random sample of Foster City households. With over 300 participants and a 95 percent confidence level, the survey results are considered reflective of the city’s population. The survey found that 85 percent of residents are satisfied or very satisfied with Foster City’s parks and recreation system—well above the national average of 62 percent. To identify resident priorities for recreation amenities and programming, ETC used its Priority Investment Rating (PIR) tool, which equally weighs the importance of a facility and the level of unmet need, as reported by survey respondents. As shown in Figure 7, top priorities identified include multi-use trails, a recreation center, indoor fitness equipment, a swimming pool, beaches, trees and shade, and walking trails in parks.

Figure 7 Foster City Park Amenity Priorities

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

254

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 20
Community Engagement Takeaways
Hundreds of engaged residents have shed light on the aspects of the parks and recreation system that should be improved, added, or prioritized. Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Trails & Connectivity

• Trails are highly valued, and residents greatly appreciate the Levee Pedway. • Residents desire additional trails connecting neighborhoods, parks, and the Levee Pedway.
• Trail improvements are needed, including increased lighting, signage, and safety.

Beaches & Water Quality

• Issues with water quality and beach conditions deter recreational use. • There are opportunities to activate the water through additional amenities, access points, and water-related programming.
• Community members have strong interest in activating the Lagoon’s edges, especially through outdoor dining.

New Park Experiences

• Foster City has a great park system, with fantastic active recreation facilities. • Residents would welcome new features to further activate and increase identity through new and unique experiences.
• There is demand for more passive spaces, such as walking paths, picnic areas, beaches, and natural open spaces.

Park Comfort

• Park users would benefit from more comfortable places to relax and walk through improved shade, pathways, and seating.
• Some highly visited parks need improved or expanded restrooms.

Indoor Recreation & Swimming

• Residents share a desire for fitness, senior, arts, and cultural programs, reinforcing the need for the new Community Center.
• Indoor fitness equipment and a swimming pool are community needs that are so far unmet with current plans.
• School joint-use agreements are essential for the community’s access to gymnasiums.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

255

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 21
Programming and Events
Programming and events are key elements of park facilities and open spaces in Foster City. Participation is reinforced by the settings themselves: waterfront views at Leo Ryan, shaded lawns at Boothbay, and playgrounds near picnic areas all create inviting environments for both organized programs and casual community use. The City offers a variety of programs and services that fall into the following core program areas:
• Afterschool Programs: Provide programming on elementary school campuses on early dismissal days.
• Athletics: Foster healthy lifestyles and promoting lifelong wellness throughout the community. • Camps: Full-day camps for children ages 4 to 13.
• Community Events: Engage Foster City residents and visitors with free to low-cost events. • Lifelong Learning and Wellness: Various classes offered year-round that provide opportunities for community engagement.
• Reservations and Rentals: Rentable rooms and park spaces that accommodate different types of events, meetings and parties.

Serving All Ages
The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department provides a balance of programs and services across all age segments. The Department should continue to provide programs across all age groups and reevaluate program offerings each year to ensure programs are responding to with the goal of keeping programs responsive to user needs. Table 4 provides a summary of the various recreational programs offered to different age groups within Foster City.

Table 4 Ages Served by Recreational Core Program Area
Ages Served
Core Program Area
Preschool
(5 and under)
Elementary
(6-12)
Teens
(13-17)
Young
Adult
(18-34)
Adult
(35-54)
Active Adult
(55-64)
Senior
(65+)
Afterschool
Enr
ichment Program
X
Athletics X X X X X X X
Community Events X X X X X X X
Facility & Park Rentals X X X X
Youth & Adult Contract
Classes & Specialty
Camps

X X X X X X
Teen Afterschool
Program
X
Youth & Teen Camps X X X
Source: Foster City Parks Master Plan Program and Services Assessment, PROS Consulting, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

256

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 22
Engagement Results on Programming
The Parks Master Plan Community Survey sheds light on community interests and needs for programming and events:
• 46 percent of residents have participated in Foster City programs in the past 12 months, significantly more than the national average of 36 percent. By weighing the importance of a program and the level of unmet need, fitness/wellness programs, community special events, outdoor recreation, programs for seniors, cultural enrichment programs, visual arts/crafts programs, performing arts programs, and pickleball lessons and leagues emerged as top priorities for residents (see Figure 8). • The biggest barrier to program participation was a lack of awareness, with 27 percent of residents indicating they did not know what was being offered. Other top barriers included inconvenient program times (23 percent) and being too busy or not interested in participating (15 percent).

Figure 8 Program and Event Priorities from the Statistically Valid Community Survey

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

257

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 23
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance is needed for many parks, facilities, and amenities to ensure promote functionality, safety, and aesthetic appeal for Foster City residents.

Engagement Results on Maintenance
The community engagement process surfaced several key insights related to park operations and maintenance. Feedback from the survey and open-ended comments highlighted both areas of satisfaction and specific concerns that can help guide future improvements. • Physical Condition Generally Rated Well, But Gaps Remain.

While 90 percent of residents rated park conditions as “excellent” or “good,” 9 percent rated them as only “fair” or “poor,” signaling pockets of maintenance issues that may be addressed through targeted interventions.
• Restroom and Trail Maintenance Need Greater Emphasis.

An Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) analysis identified paved path/trails, restrooms, and waterways/beaches as the top two priorities for maintenance. These areas had high importance but relatively lower satisfaction scores, indicating strong community demand for better upkeep. • Cleanliness and Environmental Conditions Are Concerns.

Although not always formally listed, geese droppings were repeatedly mentioned in open-ended comments as a major deterrent to park use, suggesting the need for more proactive sanitation and environmental management as part of routine maintenance.

Maintenance Assessment
A Park Maintenance and Operations Assessment was conducted as part of the Foster City Parks Master Plan, analyzing current maintenance practices, staffing levels, service standards, and operational challenges across the city’s park system. The assessment evaluated how the City maintains its parks and open spaces and reviewed key functions such as turf management, irrigation, equipment upkeep, and trail maintenance.

Key challenges that came out of this assessment included:
• Lack of a Formal Maintenance Management Plan
While some standards exist, the City does not have a fully documented plan tracking work performance and outcomes by park.
• No GIS-Based Asset Management System
The absence of such a system limits the City’s ability to track maintenance needs, costs, and asset lifecycles efficiently.
• Slight Staffing Deficiency
The City staffing levels for parks falls short compared to best-practice benchmarks for park maintenance operations.
• Underfunding of Maintenance Operations
Annual park maintenance funding falls short compared to the level needed for optimal service.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

258

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 24
• Well-Equipped but Needs Continued Investment
The City currently has the necessary vehicles and equipment but must reinvest as the system grows to maintain service levels.

Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Foster City’s open space network presents several meaningful opportunities for enhancing natural habitat and wildlife compatibility, including targeted rewilding that can enhance ecological integrity and restore natural processes across the urban landscape. Guided by the provisions of SB 1425, the City can pursue strategies that preserve, enhance, and expand habitat areas within and adjacent to developed zones. The City’s open spaces are identified in Figure 9, below.

Belmont Slough, which forms a natural boundary between Foster City and Redwood Shores, is a prime opportunity area for rewilding. The surrounding wetlands provide vital habitat for shorebirds and native plant communities such as cordgrass and pickleweed. With portions of the shoreline under the management of the CDFW and others privately owned, there are opportunities for both targeted and coordinated restoration efforts such as marshland expansion, the creation of buffer zones using native vegetation, and formal habitat restoration plans that involve multiple local and regional agencies and funding sources.

Seal Slough, also known as Marina Lagoon, represents another opportunity to support habitat connectivity and ecological health. While much of the slough is managed by the City of San Mateo, Foster City shares responsibility for adjacent areas and could support and collaborate on restoration efforts. Strategies may include riparian plantings, removal of invasive species, and the establishment of small-scale wildlife corridors.

Beyond these tidal and riparian corridors, Foster City’s urban parks and landscaped areas offer potential for small-scale rewilding. Parks such as Boothbay and Port Royal could be enhanced by replacing portions of ornamental lawns with native, drought-tolerant plants, introducing wildflower meadows, or establishing gardens focused on native species. Even highly engineered shoreline areas could benefit from nature-based enhancements, such as vegetated buffer strips and boardwalks that improve both habitat quality and public engagement with natural spaces. For additional information and policies on habitat and wildlife management and connectivity, please see the Conservation Element.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

259

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 25
Figure 9 Publicly Accessible Open Space

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

260

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 26
Climate Resiliency
Foster City’s open spaces also play a critical role in advancing the City’s climate resiliency goals by serving as buffers against climate-related hazards and offering natural systems that help moderate environmental stressors. Coastal wetlands and shoreline open spaces, such as those near Belmont Slough and the Bay Trail, absorb floodwaters, reduce wave energy, and space for marsh migration and living-shoreline measures needed to accommodate sea level rise over time.

Mapping of sea level rise scenarios illustrates that while Foster City’s upgraded levee provides critical protection against current coastal hazards, the community remains vulnerable to future conditions driven by climate change. Figure 10 shows a mid-century scenario of approximately 0.8 feet of SLR (about the increase expected during typical daily high tides by 2050, absent any storms). Under this scenario, portions of the shoreline, including parks, trails, and some low-lying residential areas (such as those along Beach Park Boulevard and the fringes of the central lagoon) could experience more frequent tidal flooding. Vulnerability increases further when considering the added impact of severe coastal storms or King Tide events on top of elevated sea levels. Figure 11 illustrates Foster City’s present-day 100-year storm surge scenario, which in combination with sea level rise could exceed the capacity of existing flood protection. Such an event could affect residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, critical infrastructure, and transportation routes, including portions of Highway 101.

Preserving, enhancing, and restoring these areas with native vegetation and habitat restoration strengthens their ability to sequester and store carbon, filter pollutants, and reduce the impacts of storm surges on adjacent neighborhoods and critical infrastructure. Open spaces also bolster ecological resilience by preserving habitat for habitat corridors that allow species to migrate and adapt to rising temperatures and shifting ecosystems, countering regional habitat fragmentation in line with AB 1889.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

261

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 27
Figure 10 Sea Level Rise Inundation (0.8 feet)

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

262

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 28
Figure 11 Present-Day (No Sea Level Rise) 100-Year Storm Inundation Risk

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

263

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 29
Another emerging concern is groundwater rise. As sea level rises, the water table in Foster City will rise as well, since the city is built on permeable fill and former marsh and the water table will rise as sea level rises. Rising groundwater can lead to flooding from below, even if surface levees hold back the Bay from direct coastal inundation. Figure 12 displays a groundwater rise hazard map for Foster City, highlighting areas particularly susceptible to groundwater rise, particularly the shoreline zones and lands around the lagoon. In these areas, the water table will likely eventually breach the surface or infiltrate underground infrastructure, causing flooding of housing foundations, road base materials, or within storm sewers. Groundwater rise could also induce soil instability or mobilize pollutants in soils.

To strengthen climate resilience and meet SB 1425 goals, Foster City should implement nature-based strategies, such as permeable surfaces, expanded tree canopy, and green stormwater infrastructure, to reduce heat, retain stormwater, and recharge shallow groundwater. For example, native plantings in shoreline parks and undeveloped parcels can strengthen soil stability, support pollinator populations, and reduce the need for irrigation. Meadow restoration and the creation of microhabitats within urban green spaces offer additional benefits by moderating temperatures and supporting localized ecosystems. As climate pressures intensify, integrating open space into the City’s adaptation strategy is vital for ecological function and for protecting the public health and safety of residents. These spaces offer cooler environments during heat waves, areas for passive stormwater retention, and opportunities for environmental education that can foster long-term stewardship and community resilience.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

264

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 30
Figure 12 Present Day (No Sea Level Rise) Groundwater Hazard

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

265

DRAFT REDLINE
Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 31
Goals and Policies
Parks and Recreation System
Goal POS-1 Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

Policy POS 1.1 Vibrant and Unique Parks. Ensure Aim for all Foster City parks are to be vibrant and have a unique identity, incorporating in-demand and innovative features for evening activation.

Policy POS 1.2 Comfo rtable Parks. Ensure Support parks are comfortable and inviting appeal by adding or improving key features such as seating, lighting, shade, and restrooms.

Policy POS 1.3 Community Needs. Ensure Strive to make the parks and recreation system is responsive to the recreation needs identified in the Parks Master Plan and through continued engagement.

Goal POS-2 Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 2.1 Connected Trail System. Create a citywide network of paths and trails for walking and biking that is safe and comfortable.

Policy POS 2.2 Navigating Parks. Ensure Promote easy access to and navigation within the City’s parks, lagoon, and trails by installing wayfinding signage and creating plans for multi-modal access.

Policy POS 2.3 Acc essible & Inclusive. Promote accessibility and inclusivity in park facilities and programs through universal design and diverse, community-responsive activities.

Goal POS-3 The Foster City Lagoon is active and well-integrated with its surroundings.

Policy POS 3.1 Lagoon Access & Amenities. Provide places and amenities to view, enjoy and access the Lagoon.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

266

DRAFT REDLINE
Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 32
Policy POS 3.2 Waterfront Activation. Increase Lagoon activation through programming and events, improved water quality, and increased water-front activity.

Programming and Events
Goal POS-4 Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs.

Policy POS 4.1 Programming. Invest in high priority programs and services that bring residents together, serve all age groups, and are responsive to community needs and desires.

Policy POS 4.2 Community Events. Strengthen community events in Foster City by improving and expanding offerings and collaborating with other recreation providers.

Operations and Maintenance
Goal POS-5 Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

Policy POS 5.1 High Quality Maintenance. Continue to support high-quality park and facility maintenance by focusing on key maintenance priorities and investing in maintenance staff, tools, and equipment.

Policy POS 5.2 Funding Strategy. Develop and implement a funding strategy to realize the City’s vision for its parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 5.3 Plan and Engage Proactively. Promote long-term success through regular planning, transparent reporting, and ongoing community engagement.

Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Goal POS-6 Foster City’s parks and open spaces support native biodiversity, climate resilience, and ecological function through targeted rewilding, habitat restoration, and nature-based solutions.

Policy POS 6.1 Urban Rewilding. Implement urban rewilding projects to reintroduce natural processes, restore natural ecosystems, and promote biodiversity.

Policy POS 6.2 Habitat Linkages. Prioritize rewilding in areas that enhance or create new habitat linkages and corridors for wildlife movement.) Policy POS 6.3 Resilient Landscaping. Prioritize the use of native, drought-tolerant, and climate-resilient vegetation in existing parks and landscaped open

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

267

DRAFT REDLINE
Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 33
spaces to enhance habitat value, reduce water demand, and support pollinators.

Policy POS 6.4 Ecologically Beneficial Features. Integrate ecologically beneficial features, such as pollinator gardens, wildflower meadows, bioswales, and native plant corridors, into public parks, medians, and along trail networks.

Policy POS 6.5 Community Participation. Encourage inclusive community participation in habitat restoration through stewardship programs, youth engagement, and interpretive signage in rewilded open spaces.

Climate Resiliency
Goal POS-7 Foster City’s open space network is adaptively managed to strengthen resilience to climate change impacts, including sea level rise, extreme heat, and flood risk.

Policy POS 7.1 Multi-benefit Prioritization. Prioritize the preservation and restoration of undeveloped open spaces and natural areas that provide multi-benefit climate services, including flood protection, carbon sequestration, heat reduction, and habitat connectivity, particularly in underserved areas.

Policy POS 7.2 Climate Data Integration. Integrate future climate scenarios, such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat, into open space design, planning, and management decisions to ensure support ecological resilience, adaptive capacity, and equitable public access.

Policy POS 7.3 Green Streets. Encourage the use of “green streets” that incorporate native vegetation, permeable surfaces, and stormwater features to enhance habitat and reduce runoff.

Policy POS 7.4 Green Infrastructure. Support the development of rooftop gardens, vertical greenery, and other integrated green infrastructure that enhances biodiversity and reduces energy use.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

268

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 34
Implementation Programs
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-a Enha nce park activation and identity by reprogramming underutilized park spaces with in-demand or innovative park amenities/experiences, referencing the park-specific improvements identified in the Parks Master Plan.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-b As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, support the expansion of passive amenities such as walking trails, picnic areas, and natural open spaces.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-c As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, seek opportunities to increase shade in parks by planting trees and/or constructing shade structures, particularly at playgrounds and picnic areas.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.2
POS-d Add or improve seating, lighting, water fountains/refill stations, trash receptacles, restrooms, and bike racks to all parks where needed.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-1.2
POS-e Explore opportunities to expand access to indoor recreation and swimming facilities by pursuing or strengthening partnerships with San Mateo-Foster City School District and private recreation providers.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-1.3
POS-f As Foster City grows, stri ve to maintain the City’s existing park acreage level of service of 3.2 acres per 1,000 residents the City will continue to maintain the existing developed parkland of 113.6 acres in Foster City.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-1.3
POS-g Determine an appropriate LOS that balances future housing and community preference and make necessary edits to Chapter 16.36 Parks and Recreation Facilities of Foster City Municipal Code.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Mid-term POS-1.3
POS-h Conduct a study of open space opportunity areas to assess their environmental constraints and natural assets. Use these insights to create a master plan that balances ecological restoration with expanded recreational access and amenities.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Short-term POS-1.3
POS-i Explore opportunities for creating a network of paths and trails that connect existing city parks, trails, and community destinations. Work cross- departmentally to implement the Bike Pedestrian Master Plan 2026.

Public Works Community
Development/Parks
and Recreation
Long-term POS-2.1
POS-j Consider additional improvements to the Levee Pedway, including distance markers, signage, and lighting, to create comfortable conditions for all trail users.

Public Works

Parks and
Recreation/Commu
nity Development
Long-term POS-2.1

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

269

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 35
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-k Ex plore strategies for establishing clear and consistent signage across the park and recreation system.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-2.2
POS-l Enhance ADA-compliant access at all parks. Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-2.3 POS-m Promote cross-cultural and multi-generational programming and facilities, recognizing the full diversity of Foster City residents.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-2.3
POS-n Explore opportunities to enhance the integration of the design of lagoon- adjacent parks with the lagoon, providing places to view, enjoy, and access the water, including boat docking opportunities.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-3.1
POS-o Collaborate across departments to continue to implement the Lagoon Water Quality Management Plan and Canada Goose Population Management Plan to improve cleanliness of lagoon-adjacent parks and lagoon water quality.

Public Works Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-p Support land use regulatory changes to encourage public access and activation along the lagoon as part of future development.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-q Continue to support the use of the lagoon for community events such as regattas, performances, etc.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-3.2
POS-r Explore opportunities to activate recreational use of the lagoon. Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-3.2 POS-s Pursue opportunities to expand high-demand recreational programs/events that serve residents of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-4.1
POS-t Continue to support and expand special events that activate community parks in all seasons.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-u Complement and connect with other recreation providers and event sponsors, developing partnerships when advantageous.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-v Encourage the dedication of staff resources to help identify and secure funding that supports park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programming and events.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-5.3
POS-w Continue to foster the provision of high-quality parks and recreation services through the strategic allocation of funds for recreation programming, park/facility maintenance, and lifecycle improvements to ensure maintain consistent financial support for meeting accepted service levels.

Parks and Recreation Ongo ing POS-5.3
POS-x Promote the use of consistent community engagement practices, such as surveys, town halls, and focus groups, to continue to gather input on evolving recreational needs and preferences.

Parks and Recreation Communications Ongoing POS-5.4

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

270

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 36
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-y Suppo rt the identification of at least one City park or trail-adjacent open space for pilot naturalization projects that include, but are not limited to, replacement of turf or ornamental plantings with native vegetation.

Monitor for habitat use, water savings, and community reception.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-6.1, POS-

6.3 POS-z Explore opportunities to map and identify areas within the City’s parks and open spaces to naturalize with the aim of connecting natural areas with rewilded areas. Prioritize rewilding efforts in places where the clearest linkages for species movement between areas.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-6.2
POS-aa Seek opportunities to host seasonal events in collaboration with local schools, nonprofits, or native plant societies to involve residents in habitat restoration activities and promote awareness of urban ecology.

Parks and Recreation Communications Bi-Annual POS-6.4
POS-bb Actively seek State and federal funding opportunities that support land conservation, shoreline resilience, or wetland restoration, and coordinate with regional agencies for joint applications.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development/City
Manager’s Office
Ongoing POS-7.1, POS-

7.2 POS-cc Pursue the development of a climate-resilient open space web viewer that overlays sea level rise projections, habitat corridors, and flood-prone areas and use as a tool for determining the highest impact naturalization and resilience-focused projects to prioritize.

Community
Development
City Manager’s
Office
Long-term POS-7.2
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 3 - P_OS Element - Redline Version

271

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction
Chapter 8: Conservation Element 1
Conservation Introduction
Foster City, 2025.

Purpose
The Conservation Element fulfills the State’s requirements for a Conservation Element and articulates Foster City’s long-term vision for conserving and managing its natural and cultural resources. Within this, it emphasizes environmental sustainability, community well-being, and climate resilience as central to the City’s management of natural resources.

This Element outlines the city’s environmental setting, highlights unique local resources, and establishes goals, policies, and implementation actions to support their protection, restoration, and sustainable use.

It guides stewardship of wildlife movement and connectivity and wildlife habitat, the urban forest, surface and groundwater, and historic, cultural, and tribal resources. It also supports efforts to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with state mandates.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for the content of this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key conservation considerations for Foster City. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for the conservation of natural resources. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

272

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 2

While these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Figure 1 identifies the parks and open spaces within Foster City. Figure 2 identifies protection responsibilities for each type of park, open space, and conservation area.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

273

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 3
Figure 1 Parks and Open Spaces

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

274

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 4
Figure 2 Protected Areas

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

275

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 5
Legal Requirements
The Conservation Element of the General Plan is guided by State law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, support ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(d) – Conservation Element Requirement
The primary legal foundation for the Conservation Element is Government Code §65302(d), which requires all general plans to include policies addressing the conservation, development, and use of natural resources. These include watersheds, forests, soils, rivers and other waters, harbors, fisheries, wildlife, minerals, and other natural systems. The statute emphasizes that policies must reflect local conditions, support long-term resource management, and be coordinated with efforts to protect air and water quality.

California Air Resources Board (CARB) and BAAQMD Guidance Statewide air quality policy is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which sets emission standards, regulates fuels and vehicles, and oversees programs aimed to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. At the regional level, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) prepares the Clean Air Plan to reduce pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, with an emphasis on cumulative pollution burdens in disproportionately impacted communities. The Conservation Element supports these goals by promoting land use patterns and infrastructure that reduce vehicle emissions, increase urban greening, and limit exposure to harmful pollutants, particularly near homes, schools, and other sensitive land uses.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of green spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities.

The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities. While most of the requirements of SB 1425 are met within the Parks and Open Space Element, many of the topics in this Element are closely related to the those covered within the Conservation Element.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

276

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 6
Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Conservation Element must align with several key regional and local planning efforts that support natural resource protection, habitat restoration, and climate resilience.
 The Climate Action Plan (CAP) establishes strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance climate resilience through energy efficiency, renewable energy, clean transportation, and sustainable land use.
 The Lagoon Management Plan outlines policies for maintaining water quality, controlling aquatic vegetation, and managing wildlife populations within the City’s lagoon system. It also provides a framework for public education and monitoring.
 The Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan provides strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreation.
 The Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan outline Foster City’s water supply reliability, drought management strategies, and contingency measures for shortages.
 The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Basin Plans (Basin Plans) establish water quality objectives, identify beneficial uses of water bodies (such as habitat or recreation), and include strategies to control pollution and manage watershed health. These Basin Plans are legally enforceable by the RWQCB and guide stormwater discharge permitting and waterway protection at the local level.
 The San Mateo County Sustainable Streets and Green Infrastructure Plan provides a framework for integrating green infrastructure, —such as rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable pavements, — into street design and public projects. It helps cities meet stormwater permit requirements while improving water quality, habitat, and streetscape aesthetics.  T
he San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program provides a coordinated framework for cities to reduce stormwater pollution through infrastructure upgrades, public education, and monitoring.
 OneShoreline, the San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District, coordinates regional adaptation efforts related to sea level rise, tidal flooding, and shoreline ecosystem restoration. Its work supports integrated infrastructure projects that reduce flood risk while enhancing natural habitat.
 In compliance with SB 18 (Gov. Code § 65352.3), the City contacted all California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area. No responses requesting consultation were received.

This regional and local framework ensures that the Conservation Element is grounded in practical, science-based strategies that address both ecological function and community well-being.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

277

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 7
Background
The process for updating the Conservation Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions; evaluating the city’s natural resources, habitat areas, water and air quality, and energy infrastructure; and identifying opportunities to enhance ecological health and climate resilience. In addition, the analysis evaluated future considerations on sea level rise, groundwater rise, extreme heat, and air quality, and highlighted opportunities to enhance biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and equitable access to green space. As shown in Figure 3, community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan (discussed further in the Parks and Open Space Element), ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Conservation Element.

Figure 3 Community Engagement Overview

* Note: Conservation Focus Groups will be conducted in August of 2025, and number engaged subsequently added.

The public engagement process for the Conservation Element update was designed to gather input on key issues such as species preservation, habitat conservation, and water quality, while ensuring alignment with the ongoing Parks Master Plan update. A key tool in this effort was a dedicated project website that provided ongoing updates and hosted the Community Priorities Survey, which built on the Parks Master Plan survey by focusing on natural resources and conservation topics. This survey gathered valuable feedback from a diverse range of residents, with particular emphasis on underrepresented communities, helping shape policies related to biodiversity, open space access, and environmental equity. Pop-up events were also used to engage the community directly, allowing them to provide input on conservation priorities while also participating in the broader parks-related discussions.

Biological Resources
Despite its highly urbanized setting and origins as reclaimed marshland, Foster City continues to support a mosaic of natural habitats. Key ecological areas include tidal wetlands, mudflats, and the centrally located lagoon system, which together provide important habitat for migratory birds, small mammals, and aquatic species. The San Francisco Bay also borders the city to the north and east and is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. As shown in Figure 4, vegetation mapping has identified several habitat types within the city, including salt marsh, non-native forest, and native herbaceous communities. Notably, 21 special-status animal species and six plant species have been observed or are presumed present,

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

278

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 8
including the endangered Ridgeway’s rail and salt-marsh harvest mouse, both dependent on the city’s remaining tidal marshes.

Foster City’s biological resources face ongoing challenges from habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and urban runoff. Shoreline habitats are often constrained by levees and adjacent development, limiting their ecological function and the ability of species to migrate or adapt to environmental change. These pressures are compounded by climate-related stressors such as rising sea levels and shifting precipitation patterns.

Within this complex landscape, areas along Belmont Slough, Seal Slough, and underutilized park edges offer potential for habitat restoration and rewilding. These efforts could strengthen native biodiversity, improve habitat connectivity, and help restore key ecosystem services. In addition, Foster City’s extensive park system presents a valuable resource for targeted naturalization and improved linkages between natural areas to support wildlife movement and expand urban habitat in meaningful ways.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

279

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 9
Figure 4 Vegetation and Land Cover

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

280

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 10
Wildlife Connectivity
Wildlife movement in Foster City is shaped, and often limited, by urban infrastructure such as roads, levees, and dense development. Natural movement corridors are limited, typically confined to narrow greenways, fragmented shoreline edges, and the lagoon system. While the lagoon offers aesthetic and recreational value to residents and visitors as well as some habitat potential, its channelized design, steep edges, and proximity to human activity reduces its habitat value for many species.

Recognizing the importance of habitat connectivity, State law (AB 1889) now requires cities and counties to assess and enhance habitat connectivity for wildlife through their general plans. In Foster City, barriers to wildlife movement include:
 Highway 92, which disrupts north–south continuity
 Urban lighting, which interferes with the behavior of nocturnal species  Recreational activity, which can fragment habitats and deter sensitive wildlife As shown in Figure 5, much of Foster City is either urban or suburban, and therefore wildlife corridors and nursery sites are not present in much of the city. Wildlife connectivity areas are fragmented, and green spaces are often landscaped for recreation rather than habitat value, reducing their ecological function. However, with strategic design and targeted improvements, these spaces can support both human and ecological needs. Enhancing shoreline habitats, planting suitable vegetation, and implementing wildlife-friendly infrastructure such as culverts or buffer zones can create pathways for wildlife movement and better contribute to a resilient and biodiverse city.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

281

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 11
Figure 5 Wildlife Connectivity Areas

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

282

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 12
Coastal Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City’s shoreline borders the San Francisco Bay and includes estuarine and brackish marshes, particularly near Belmont Slough and the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. These areas serve as vital feeding and nesting grounds for numerous bird species, including some species of special concern. The Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve, a protected 268-acre salt marsh, supports sensitive species such as the Alameda song sparrow and Ridgeway’s rail and serves as a critical ecological buffer against urban development.

Foster City has made significant investments in engineered flood protection systems, including recent upgrades to its levee system, which play a critical role in safeguarding the community from storm surge and sea level rise. These infrastructure improvements represent an essential layer of protection for residents and assets. At the same time, this flood protection infrastructure can constrain natural ecological processes and limit the inland migration of wetlands, which play a vital role in preserving local ecological integrity by providing habitat for diverse wildlife, serving as temporary resting areas for migrating species, filtering water pollutants, and offering natural flood protection. As climate change accelerates, coastal ecosystems face increasing stress from rising groundwater, saline intrusion, and greater exposure of infrastructure. The continued loss of tidal marshes would reduce habitat availability and diminish the shoreline’s natural ability to buffer wave energy and filter pollutants.

Regional planning efforts, such as those led by the BCDC San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and OneShoreline, recognize the importance of complementing traditional infrastructure with natural systems, such as tidal marshes and mudflats, to strengthen shoreline resilience. By restoring degraded habitat and integrating nature-based features into levee design, Foster City can build on its recent investments to ensure long-term ecological and community resilience.

Climate Considerations
Climate change presents significant risks to Foster City’s biological resources. Rising temperatures, shifts in precipitation patterns, and sea level rise pose risks to habitat health, food and water availability for

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

283

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 13
wildlife, while potentially limiting access to necessary wildlife connectivity and migration corridors. Low- lying shoreline habitats face potential inundation in the future, which would result in the loss of critical wetlands, biodiversity corridors, and coastal buffer zones. Urban green spaces, such as parks and vegetated areas along the lagoon and coastline, can serve as important refuges and movement corridors for wildlife. However, they currently offer limited climate resilience opportunities due to sparse tree canopy and fragmented natural areas.

Adapting to climate change requires a multifaceted strategy that includes nature-based solutions such as wetland restoration, permeable surfaces, and urban forestry. These solutions can help preserve biodiversity and support species resilience, as well as other benefits such as mitigating flooding, reducing urban heat, and supporting habitat migration. In addition, the city is exploring a citywide tree canopy study, which, when paired with surface heat mapping and social vulnerability data, could guide future investments in climate-resilient green infrastructure and improve neighborhood-level adaptation strategies.

Water Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City maintains a network of engineered lagoons and canals designed primarily for stormwater management, flood control, and community recreation. These water features also provide secondary habitat for birds and aquatic species and are not used for potable water supply. The city’s drinking water is entirely imported via the Estero Municipal Improvement District, supplied by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Hetch Hetchy system. While Foster City does not currently utilize local groundwater for its municipal supply, it remains vulnerable to regional groundwater-level fluctuations driven by climate change. The development of this Element included coordination with EMID, and review of and alignment with applicable water supply, water quality, and groundwater management plans.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

284

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 14
Water Quality
Drinking water quality in Foster City is high, with the Estero Municipal Improvement District meeting or exceeding all State and federal standards. Water is treated at regional facilities before distribution and is continuously monitored. However, water quality issues are more pronounced in the city’s lagoon system, where elevated bacteria levels, especially enterococci, have led to periodic beach closures.

These issues are largely attributed to wildlife waste, stormwater runoff, and overgrown aquatic vegetation.

To address lagoon water quality, the City has adopted a Lagoon Management Plan, emphasizing routine monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The city also participates in regional programs to prevent stormwater pollution and maintain compliance with the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. While efforts are underway, water quality in the lagoon and shoreline areas will remain a concern until planned actions for improving runoff management, enhancing ecological buffers, and managing urban wildlife populations are implemented.

Water Supply
Foster City’s water supply is entirely imported through the Hetch Hetchy system, managed by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. During normal years, supply is projected to be adequate through 2045. However, in single and multiple dry years, demand is projected to outpace supply, with deficits exceeding 800 million gallons annually by 2045 under drought conditions. In the event of a water shortage, the Estero Municipal Improvement District would implement its Water Shortage Contingency Plan which outlines a suite of water demand reduction measures of varying severity designed to protect health and safety, minimize economic disruption, and preserve environmental and community assets.

Nonetheless, the City is vulnerable to regional supply constraints, especially as climate change increases the frequency of dry periods.

Given this dependency, continued participation in regional conservation programs, alternative supply planning, and demand management will be essential. The Estero Municipal Improvement District’s Urban Water Management Plan identifies the need for coordinated planning with regional partners and highlights the importance of preparing for worst-case drought scenarios. While recycled water is not currently used, it presents potential opportunities to supplement current and future water supplies and serve as an emergency backup option as climate risks evolve.

Climate Considerations
Climate change poses several risks to Foster City’s water infrastructure and management systems. Rising sea levels may compromise the lagoon’s drainage function, particularly during high tides or storm events. Higher average temperatures could increase lagoon evaporation and elevate potential for harmful algal blooms. This increased potential is driven by higher concentrations of contaminants and warmer water temperatures that promote algal growth, threatening habitat quality and recreational use. Additionally, altered precipitation patterns are expected to intensify stormwater runoff, potentially degrading lagoon water quality and overwhelming existing infrastructure. Groundwater rise is also projected to threaten buried infrastructure due to rising sea levels, leading to potential seawater intrusion, and contribute to inland flooding. Although the city is not dependent on groundwater as a water source, rising water tables could affect public utilities, natural open spaces, and impact natural and landscaped vegetation.

To proactively address these risks, Foster City can continue to implement targeted adaptation strategies such as strengthening of levees, improved lagoon circulation, shoreline wetland restoration, and

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

285

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 15
integration of green stormwater infrastructure. Proactive monitoring of groundwater conditions, in collaboration with regional agencies, will be critical for planning for future risks. Ensuring the continued function of the lagoon as both a flood control and ecological system will be essential in the face of climate variability and sea level rise.

Air Quality
Air quality in Foster City is significantly influenced by regional emissions, increasing wildfire smoke frequency due to climate change, and local traffic. The city currently lacks comprehensive, localized air quality monitoring infrastructure to track these impacts accurately and instead relies on nearby stations for data, which may not accurately reflect localized conditions. Indoor air quality trends in public buildings are also not well-documented, leaving gaps in understanding the full scope of exposure.

Emerging challenges for air quality in Foster City include increased wildfire smoke events, rising temperatures, and cumulative pollution from nearby urban centers. High temperatures can increase the formation of ground-level ozone, while inversions can trap pollutants close to the ground, leading to increased concentrations of harmful substances. Low-cost sensor deployment, improved building ventilation systems, and cumulative exposure mapping can better assess air quality risks. Coordinated efforts with Bay Area Air Quality Management District and regional grant programs may support these actions and contribute to healthier environments for vulnerable populations.

Energy Resources
Foster City has implemented a range of initiatives that provide a strong foundation for further opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy resilience through upgrades to its parks, public buildings, and community infrastructure. Existing municipal facilities, including - community centers powered by Peninsula Clean Energy’s 100 percent carbon-free electricity program, ECO100, can further reduce electricity use and light pollution through energy efficiency upgrades like LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and renewable-powered water management systems. In areas where conventional grid connections are costly or impractical, solar-powered lighting offers a low- maintenance, renewable solution. Energy conservation also supports broader climate and sustainability goals, particularly when paired with smart building materials and all-electric systems in future facility upgrades or new construction.

The City is also well-positioned to expand on-site renewable energy and support clean transportation infrastructure. The Foster City Library currently includes roof-mounted solar panels and a A recent feasibility study identified other municipal buildings, such as the library and forthcoming recreation center, as viable sites for photovoltaic (PV) systems. These, along with potential solar canopies over parking lots or maintenance buildings, could be paired with battery storage to improve emergency preparedness and grid reliability. Parks and civic buildings are also key locations for expanding EV charging infrastructure, particularly through public-private partnerships. Education and community engagement will play a central role in cultivating support for these initiatives, using public spaces as platforms for demonstrations, signage, and workshops that promote energy literacy and sustainable living practices.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

286

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 16
Engagement Results for Conservation
During the development of the Conservation Element, residents shared priorities and perspectives on the natural resources and conservation strategies for Foster City through pop-up events, focus group discussions, a workshop, and a survey. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Community Priorities Survey
A critical component of community input was the Community Priorities Survey conducted in June 2025 via online questionnaire. The Foster City community expressed strong support for enhancing parks, trails, and natural spaces, with a focus on comfort, connectivity, and safety. Amenities such as restrooms, shade, seating, and wildlife viewing platforms were identified as top priorities for improving trail use. The Levee Pedway is frequently used by residents, and there is significant interest in expanding trail and bike lane connections. Conservation emerged as a clear community value, with most respondents rating it as very or extremely important and voicing strong support for rewilding efforts like native habitat restoration and pollinator-friendly landscaping. While enthusiasm for rewilding was high, some concerns were raised about pests, upkeep, and potential changes to recreational spaces.

Survey participants identified key environmental concerns, including sea level rise, storm flooding, water scarcity, and poor air quality. Residents placed a high value on open spaces that offer opportunities to connect with nature, support biodiversity, provide shade, and reduce climate-related risks. The most desired improvements included more walking and biking paths, increased tree cover, and restoring natural areas with native vegetation. There was also strong support for integrating green infrastructure, such as rain gardens and wetlands, and expanding educational features and access for all ages and abilities.

The community supported a wide range of strategies to protect open space and natural resources, including stronger zoning regulations, public-private partnerships, volunteer maintenance programs, and development incentives. Residents expressed a clear desire for the Foster City Lagoon to support both active and passive recreation, along with aesthetic and community uses. In terms of climate communication, respondents wanted more information on local flood risks, sea level rise, and ways to prepare for climate impacts. Overall, the results reflect a community that values nature, recognizes the urgency of climate adaptation, and is eager to engage in shaping a more sustainable and resilient future.

Community Engagement Takeaways
Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Support for Rewilding with Thoughtful Design

 There is strong community interest in rewilding efforts that restore native habitats, support pollinators, and enhance the ecological function of parks and open spaces.
 At the same time, many want these naturalized areas to be designed and maintained in ways that remain usable, safe, and visually appealing – balancing ecological goals with everyday recreation and comfort.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

287

DRAFT REDLINE
Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 17
 Concerns were raised about the potential to attract nuisance wildlife such as geese, as well as the need for clear upkeep and visibility. The feedback underscores a desire for rewilding that enhances, rather than limits, the public’s experience of open space.

Naturalized and Functional Open Spaces

 Community members want parks and open spaces to feel more ecologically rich while remaining comfortable and accessible, with amenities like shade, seating, and natural materials integrated into the landscape.
 There is interest in expanding tree cover and using native vegetation to provide cooling, habitat value, and a more natural aesthetic across the city’s open spaces.
 Some suggested that conservation-oriented spaces still need to accommodate daily use, such as keeping restrooms open longer and providing places to rest, so that naturalized areas remain welcoming and inclusive.

Concern for Climate Risks

 Sea level rise, stormwater flooding, water scarcity, and declining air quality were repeatedly raised as major concerns.
 Open space is seen as a critical tool for addressing climate impacts, offering functions like cooling, habitat protection, and stormwater infiltration.  Community members want more communication from the City about local flood risks, sea level rise adaptation, and practical steps households can take to prepare.

Sustainable Open Space

 There is strong backing for strategies like zoning protections, green infrastructure, and developer incentives that prioritize open space and ecological function.
 Volunteer programs and partnerships with local organizations are viewed as effective ways to support ongoing restoration and stewardship.  People value the Foster City Lagoon as a space for both active and passive recreation, and want it protected for future generations.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

288

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 18
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs
Biological Resources
Goal C-1 Natural habitat is protected and restored to support native biodiversity, improve ecological function, and enhance the resilience of open spaces.

Policy C-1.1 Wildlife Habitat. Protect and enhance Foster City’s existing habitats, including tidal wetlands, mudflats, and urban forests, to support native biodiversity and ecological health.

Policy C-1.2 Habitat Protection. Promote the restoration and naturalization of degraded or underutilized areas, particularly along the shoreline and coastal trails, through native vegetation planning and habitat enhancement.

Policy C-1.3 Support Biodiversity. Implement maintenance strategies that prioritize native vegetation and manage detrimental invasive plant and animal species in natural habitat areas. Allow non-native plants only if they support aesthetics or habitat without harming biodiversity. Select vegetation that attracts desirable species and discourages those that pose nuisance or ecological risks.

Goal C-2 Ecological connections between fragmented habitats are strengthened to facilitate wildlife movement, support species adaptation, and minimize the impacts of urban development on biodiversity.

Policy C-2.1 Habitat Connectivity. Improve connectivity between fragmented parks, shoreline areas, and natural spaces to support wildlife movement through restored corridors and green infrastructure.

Policy C-2.2 Wildlife Movement Design. Incorporate wildlife-friendly infrastructure, such as underpasses, vegetated buffers, and light controls into public infrastructure and land use planning.

Policy C-2.3 Movement Mitigation. Assess and mitigate barriers to wildlife movement caused by roads, levees, and urban development.

Policy C-2.4 Connectivity Partnerships. Coordinate with regional partners, including OneShoreline, to support connectivity and flood resilience through multi-benefit projects.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

289

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 19
Policy C-2.5 Habitat Improvements. Identify and prioritize habitat improvements that benefit migratory species, including birds and small mammals, in accordance with AB 1889.

Goal C-3 Foster City’s natural systems are resilient to the impacts of climate change.

Policy C-3.1 Climate Conscious Shoreline Management. Integrate sea level rise, flooding, and extreme weather considerations into shoreline habitat management and restoration.

Policy C-3.2 Nature-Based Solutions. Implement nature-based solutions, such as wetland buffers and marsh migration zones, to protect both ecological and human systems.

Policy C-3.3 Ecological Transitions. Ensure Support conservation strategies account for sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, and climate-driven shifts in habitat type, extent, and species composition.

Goal C-4 A community-wide ethic of environmental stewardship is fostered by engaging residents, regional partners, and organizations in the protection and enhancement of local natural resources.

Policy C-4.1 Public Awareness. Increase public awareness of urban wildlife, habitat conservation, and sustainable coexistence through education and outreach.

Policy C-4.2 Community Stewardship. Encourage community participation in habitat restoration, monitoring, and stewardship activities.

Policy C-4.3 Conservation Partnerships. Partner with regional agencies, nonprofits, and academic institutions to advance conservation and resilience objectives.

Water Resources
Goal C-5 Water resources are efficiently managed to ensure support a sustainable, high-quality water supply for the community while promoting conservation, reducing demands, and protecting water systems from climate change.

Policy C-5.1 Water Quality Risk Prevention. Address water quality risks associated with climate change, including warming temperatures, increased turbidity, and the potential for algal blooms in the lagoon and stormwater systems.

Policy C-5.2 Water Quality Maintenance. Support ongoing maintenance and timely replacement of aging lagoon, stormwater, and water infrastructure to protect ecological function and recreational use.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

290

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 20
Policy C-5.3 Pollution Reduction. Improve lagoon circulation and implement pollution control measures to maintain water quality and mitigate contamination from urban runoff and other sources.

Policy C-5.4 Water Quality Programing. Expand participation in regional water quality programs, including the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program, to better manage stormwater runoff and protect the San Francisco Bay.

Policy C-5.5 Water Quality Monitoring. Incorporate regular monitoring and public reporting of water quality conditions into city operations to support data- driven decision-making and transparency.

Goal C-6 Foster City maintains a secure and sustainable water supply to support current and future community needs.

Policy C-6.1 Water Reliability. Collaborate with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to improve long-term water reliability, conservation strategies, and demand forecasting, especially under future drought conditions.

Policy C-6.2 Supplemental Water Supply. Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to explore alternative or supplemental water supply options and regularly update reliability assessments in response to climate trends.

Policy C-6.3 Water Neutrality. Implement and enforce the 2023 Water Neutrality Ordinance to ensure so that new development and redevelopment do not increase overall water demand.

Policy C-6. 4 Water Conservation. Integrate water conservation, reuse, and efficiency measures into new development, infrastructure upgrades, and public education initiatives.

Air Quality
Goal C-7 Foster City is a healthy and climate-resilient community through reduced air pollution and improved air quality.

Policy C-7.1 Land Use Alignment. Align Foster City’s land use, transportation, and development decisions with air quality thresholds and best practices established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Policy C-7.2 Air Quality Mitigation. Incorporate air quality mitigation strategies into land use planning by requiring vegetative buffers, enhanced filtration systems, and site design strategies to reduce exposure near major transportation corridors and pollution sources.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

291

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 21
Policy C-7.3 Complete Streets. Encourage smart growth and complete streets principles that integrate air quality protection measures, such as shade trees and green infrastructure.

Policy C-7.4 VMT Reduction. Prioritize transportation and mobility improvements that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and emissions, including expansion of pedestrian, bicycle, and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure.

Policy C-7.5 Regional Air Quality Coordination. Enhance regional coordination and compliance with BAAQMD programs and participate in local implementation of Spare the Air and other outreach initiatives.

Goal C-8 Foster City’s neighborhoods are healthy, resilient, and equitable, with clean air and access to green spaces for all residents.

Policy C-8.1 Greening Air Improvements. Expand urban greening strategies that improve air quality and reduce urban heat, including targeted tree canopy expansion and the use of vegetated buffers in high-exposure areas.

Policy C-8.2 Tree City. Pursue Tree City USA designation and adopt a citywide tree ordinance that guides planting, removal, and long-term care of public trees, with a focus on air quality and shade equity.

Policy C-8.3 Air Quality Co-Benefits. Design public parks and open spaces to maximize air quality benefits while supporting climate adaptation and equitable access to green space.

Policy C-8.4 Air Quality Engagement. Promote public awareness and engagement on air quality topics through education programs, signage, and collaboration with regional partners.

Energy Resources
Goal C-9 Foster City’s public facilities and infrastructure operate sustainably with low-energy use and resilient systems that support a clean and climate-ready future.

Policy C-9.1 Improved Energy Efficiency. Improve energy efficiency in parks, public buildings, and community centers through lighting upgrades, smart controls, and design strategies that reduce both electricity consumption and light pollution.

Policy C-9.2 Renewable Energy Expansion. Expand the use of on-site renewable energy systems, particularly photovoltaic (PV) installations and battery storage, on City-owned facilities where cost-effective.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

292

DRAFT REDLINE
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 22
Policy C-9.3 EV Charging. Support the installation of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations in public parks, community centers, and City parking lots to enable a transition to clean transportation.

Policy C-9.4 Low-Carbon Construction. Promote all-electric systems and low-carbon construction practices in the design and retrofit of new municipal facilities.

Policy C-9.5 Energy Outreach. Use public spaces, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, as platforms for energy-related education, outreach, and engagement.

Policy C-9.6 Energy Efficiency in Green Infrastructure. Integrate energy efficiency and renewable energy into green infrastructure projects to enhance co- benefits for climate resilience, water conservation, and long-term cost savings.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

293

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 23
Implementation Programs
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-a E xplore opportunities for habitat restoration and naturalization within the existing parks system through the following steps:
 Assess and map high-potential sites (e.g., degraded park edges, canal embankments, underutilized shoreline areas);
 Integrate habitat strategies into the next Parks Master Plan update or as part of implementation actions;
 Develop guidance for incorporating native habitat elements into future park renovations, new park development, and routine maintenance; and  Coordinate with restoration partners, schools, and community groups for implementation and stewardship.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2,
C-1.3
C-b Seek funding for a long-term maintenance plan for restored and naturalized habitat areas that includes seasonal invasive species removal, native plant reestablishment, irrigation reduction, and trash/debris removal. Consider pilot programs with community stewardship groups to assist with hands-on maintenance and monitoring.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2
C-c Design and introduce educational signage at key natural areas (e.g., Belmont Slough, shoreline parks) with clear, engaging content about native ecosystems, local wildlife, and restoration goals. Include multilingual content, maps, and QR codes linking to informational websites. Encourage stewardship behaviors through signage, like staying on trails and avoiding disturbance of wildlife.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-1.3
C-d Continue to explore suitable levee-adjacent zones to retrofit with ecotone features that support both flood protection and habitat enhancement. Engage with OneShoreline, regional restoration partners, and permitting agencies to align with long-term sea level rise adaptation planning and pursue funding for design and implementation.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.3

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

294

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 24
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-e E xplore opportunities to better understand and improve ecological connectivity across the city. This may include studying ecological connectivity and mapping of habitat patches, identifying barriers (e.g., roads, fences, lighting), and evaluating where enhancements could support multi-species movement, especially along Belmont Slough, lagoon edges, and gaps between open spaces. Where feasible, consider coordination with regional experts and agencies to assess general habitat needs and potential improvements over time.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.2,
C-2.3, C-2.5
C-f Encourage the inclusion of wildlife-supportive features into infrastructure and discretionary development projects where appropriate. These features may include safe road crossings, native vegetative buffers, wildlife-friendly fencing, down-shielded lighting, and mitigation measures for existing barriers.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Ongoing C-2.2, C-2.3,
C-2.5
C-g Assess local habitat mitigation opportunities (e.g., offsetting development impacts) and create a grant funding strategy targeting AB 1889, Wildlife Conservation Board, and Proposition 1 programs. Design packaged projects with detailed scopes, cost estimates, and co-benefits to enhance competitiveness for funding.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.5
C-h Coordinate with OneShoreline, San Mateo Resource Conservation District, nonprofit organizations, and research institutions on joint grant applications, technical studies, and pilot projects that advance shared conservation goals, consistent with this Conservation Element.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-4.3
C-i Enhance the City’s water quality monitoring program to include indicators influenced by climate change, such as water temperature, turbidity, algal growth, and bacteria levels. Encourage the installation of real-time sensors at key locations in the lagoon system and stormwater outfalls, and use this data to inform water quality advisories, infrastructure upgrades, and restoration planning.

Public Works Mid-term C-5.1
C-j Consider capital improvement project phasing to minimize disruption and align with sea level rise adaptation efforts.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-5.2

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

295

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 25
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-k C ontinue to implement targeted strategies to reduce non-point source pollution, such as installing pet waste stations in parks, increasing street sweeping near outfalls, and adding trash capture devices in key storm drains.

Coordinate these efforts with the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan to reduce the impacts of the goose population on water quality. Seek to pair these efforts with a multilingual public education campaign on pollution prevention, lagoon protection, and green infrastructure.

Parks and
Recreation/Pu
blic Works
Community Development Ongoing C-5.3 C-l Support increased City participation in regional water quality initiatives, such as the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program. Identify City staff to represent Foster City in interagency meetings and explore co- funding or joint implementation of stormwater retrofits.

Public Works Community Development Mid-term C-5.4
C-m Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District to explore use of alternative water sources such as greywater or direct potable reuse to support the city’s long-term water reliability and sustainability goals.

Public
Works/Commu
nity
Development
Long-term C-6.2
C-n Explore additional opportunities to establish partnerships with local and regional agencies and organizations to develop a public outreach campaign to increase awareness of existing water conservation programs and provide education on water conservation, targeting residents, schools, and businesses.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-6.4
C-o Develop a set of planning and design guidelines for locating sensitive land uses (e.g., schools, senior housing) near high-traffic roadways. The guidelines should recommend best practices such as building orientation, MERV-13 or higher HVAC filtration, vegetated screening, and site layout strategies to reduce pollutant exposure. Integrate these standards into development review and environmental review processes where feasible.

Community
Development
Public Works Mid-term C-7.1, C-7.2
C-p As part of future maintenance projects, identify opportunities to install vegetative buffers, such as hedgerows, or bioswales between roads and sensitive land uses. Prioritize high-performing vegetation species suited to pollution absorption and local climate when installing new landscaping in these areas.

Public Works Community Development Ongoing C-7.2, C-7.3

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

296

DRAFT REDLINE
Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 26
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-q R eview and enhance the City’s Complete Streets and public realm guidelines to include stormwater planters, permeable paving, and native landscaping as standard components of street design to support air quality, active transportation, and neighborhood cooling, particularly in areas with higher pollution exposure.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-5.1, C-5.3, C-7.3, C-7.4
C-r Support ongoing coordination with BAAQMD to ensure help keep the City’s plans and policies generally align with regional air quality standards and emission reduction targets. Participate in updates to the Clean Air Plan and pursue grant funding to implement local air quality improvement projects.

Community
D
evelopment
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Annual C-7.5
C-s Conduct a tree inventory and prioritize new plantings near schools and major roads where vegetation can mitigate air quality and urban heat impacts.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-8.1, C-8.3
C-t Pursue the development of a tree ordinance that governs planting, maintenance, and removal of City-owned and potentially private trees, including a permit system, replacement ratios, and performance standards.

Align ordinance goals with air quality, climate, and equity outcomes.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Short-term C-8.2
C-u As part of future updates to the Climate Action Plan, update audits of energy use in existing municipal buildings to evaluate efficacy of energy conservation measures. Implement upgrades such as LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and smart ventilation and irrigation systems in buildings, restrooms, pathways, and sports facilities.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Mid-term C-9.1, C-9.6
C-v Advance photovoltaic installations at City-owned buildings and parking lots based on the recent feasibility study, beginning with priority sites like the Library/Community Center and planned Recreation Center. Explore solar canopies over large, paved areas and pair installations with battery storage for emergency backup and energy cost optimization.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.2, C-9.6
C-w Identify opportunities to install EV charging stations at high-traffic public facilities such as community centers, parks, and libraries that are accessible to all residents.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.3
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 4 - Cons Element - Redline Version

297

Attachment 5
Full List of Edits as Shown in Red-Lined Versions
Conservation Element
• Page 6
o Added the Climate Action Plan, Lagoon Management Plan, Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan, Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan, and San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program under “Regional and Local Planning”
• Page 7
o Removed the note under and updated Figure 3 Community Engagement Overview
• Page 12
o Spelled out BCDC as “the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission” since that was the first use of the acronym
• Page 15
o Clarified that the Foster City Library has existing roof-mounted solar panels • Page 19
o Changed “ensure” to “support” in Policy C-3.3
o Changed “ensure” to “support” in Goal C-5
• Page 20
o Changed “to ensure” to “so” in Policy C-6.3
• Page 26
o Changed “ensure” to “help keep” in Implementation Program C-r o Added a footnote indicating the number of years for each timeframe. Short- term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years) Parks and Open Space Element
• Page 4
o Added the Parks Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program, Lagoon Management Plan, Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan, and Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan to the list of regional and local plans • Page 6
o Removed the note under and updated Figure 2 Community Engagement Overview
o Changed total acreage from 133 to 113
o Removed “and open spaces”

7.1 Attachment 5 - Full List of Edits in Redlined Versions

298

o Added “Many of these spaces are notable for features such as well- maintained landscaping, lagoon and bayfront views, shaded picnic areas, and family-friendly playgrounds that encourage regular use. ” • Page 7
o Removed “and ecological”
o Added “holding approximately 1,300 acre-feet of water” o Replaced “Poor water quality and an abundant Canadian Geese population has created maintenance and operations challenges for the City and has discouraged recreational use of the Lagoon. ” with “Water testing in the lagoon has detected avian DNA, and while the lagoon supports a large Canada Geese population, the results cannot be traced specifically to geese or to any single location. Nevertheless, the presence of Canada Geese contributes to ongoing challenges with cleanliness and maintenance.

Outside of designated beach areas, water quality is generally similar to bay w a t e r.”
• Page 8
o Replaced “ensure” with “support”
o Changed column heading in Table 1 from “Amenities” to “Major Amenities” o Removed “BBQ” from Boothbay Park amenities
o Removed “Parking Lot” from Leo J. Ryan Park amenities • Page 9
o Updated total neighborhood park acreage from 34.9 to 33.7 o Added “Beach” to Gull Park amenities
o Added “Beach” to Marlin Park amenities
o Moved Pilgrim Triton under “Mini Parks”
o Removed “Restroom” from Shad Park amenities
o Removed a comma from the Sunfish Park amenities list
o Changed the total number of mini parks from 6 to 8
o Updated total mini park acreage from 5.7 to 7.5
o Changed the acreage of Arturus Park from 0.75 to 0.8
o Changed the acreage of Gateshead Park from 0.1 to 0.7 o Changed the acreage of Leo Park from 0.015 to 0.1
o Removed “BBQ” from Baywinds Park amenities
o Updated the subtotal number of parks from 23 to 25
o Updated the subtotal of acres from 112.9 to 113.6
• Page 13

7.1 Attachment 5 - Full List of Edits in Redlined Versions

299

o Revised the text under “Park Acreage” to remove language regarding LOS standards and added that an appropriate LOS standard will be set in the future
o Changed the total acres for parks from 112.9 to 113.6 o Changes the grand total of acres from 134.9 to 135.6
• Page 16
o Removed the word “passive” from the first paragraph
o Added “potentially, ” removed “low impact, ” and removed “such as wildlife viewing, nature exploration, and picnicking” at the end of the second paragraph
• Page 21
o Added “Participation is reinforced by the settings themselves: waterfront views at Leo Ryan, shaded lawns at Boothbay, and playgrounds near picnic areas all create inviting environments for both organized programs and casual community use.”
o Replaced “to ensure programs are responding to” with “with the goal of keeping programs responsive to”
• Page 23
o Replaced “ensure” with “promote”
o Removed the bullet point on staffing deficiency
• Page 31
o Replaced “ensure” with “aim for” and replaced “are” with “to be” in Policy POS 1.1
o Replaced “ensure” with “support” in Policy POS 1.2. Removed “s” from “parks, ” changed “comfortable” to “comfort” and replaced “inviting” with “appeal” in Policy POS 1.2
o Replaced “ensure” with “strive to make” and removed “is” in Policy POS 1.3 o Replaced “ensure” with “promote” in Policy POS 2.2
• Page 33
o Replaced “ensure” with “support” in Policy POS 7.3
• Page 34
o Revised Implementation Program POS-f
o Added a new Implementation Program POS-g
• Page 35
o Replaced “ensure” with “maintain” in Implementation Program POS-w (previously POS-v)
• Page 36

7.1 Attachment 5 - Full List of Edits in Redlined Versions

300

o Added a footnote indicating the number of years for each timeframe. Short- term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years)

7.1 Attachment 5 - Full List of Edits in Redlined Versions

301

General Plan Parks and Open Space Element
and Conservation Element
Engagement Results Summary
prepared by
City of Foster City
Community Development Department
610 Foster City Boulevard
Foster City, California 94404
Contact: Vanessa Brannon, Senior Management Analyst
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
66 Franklin Street, Suite 200
Oakland, California 94607
September 2025

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

302

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

303

Table of Contents

Engagement Results Summary i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Engagement Activity Results ................................................................................................ 2

2.1 Community Priorities Survey ...................................................................................... 2

2.2 Pop-Up Events .......................................................................................................... 2

2.3 Joint Workshop .......................................................................................................... 3

2.4 Focus Groups ............................................................................................................ 3

2.4.1 Community Organizations Focus Group ...................................................... 3

2.4.2 Regional and Technical Non-Governmental Organizations Focus Group ............................................................................................... 4

2.5 Senate Bill (SB) 18 Tribal Consultation Results ......................................................... 5

2.6 Public Comment Period ............................................................................................. 5 3 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 19 Tables
Table 1 Public Comments....................................................................................................... 6 Appendices
Appendix A Community Priorities Survey Results

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

304

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

ii

This page intentionally left blank.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

305

Introduction

Engagement Results Summary 1
1 Introduction
The City of Foster City has undertaken a series of engagement activities to inform the updates to its Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element. These efforts were designed to capture a wide range of community voices, from residents who regularly use the City’s parks to regional organizations focused on conservation and resilience. Engagement activities included a community priorities survey, two pop-up events, a joint workshop, two focus groups, formal consultation with local tribes under Senate Bill (SB) 18, and a public comment period.

The concurrently developed Parks Master Plan also included its own engagement process, some of which overlapped with these activities. While the General Plan updates drew from that shared input where relevant, activities scoped specifically for the Parks Master Plan are not included in this summary, as they are documented in a separate summary of engagement.

Together, these activities provided a comprehensive understanding of the community’s priorities, concerns, and aspirations for the future of Foster City’s parks, natural resources, and open spaces.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

306

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

2 2 Engagement Activity Results

2.1 Community Priorities Survey
The Community Priorities Survey was designed to build upon the input provided through surveys collected for the Parks Master Plan effort and establish baseline information about resident values, preferences, and concerns regarding Foster City’s park system and natural resources. It was distributed both digitally and at in-person events, ensuring that residents across different demographics could participate. Ninety-two responses to the survey were received. Survey questions and responses collected are found in Attachment A.

Survey results revealed strong support for improving trail amenities, such as additional shade, seating, and restrooms. Respondents also identified the need for better wayfinding signage and lighting to improve safety along paths and in park spaces. Rewilding efforts, such as restoring native habitats, expanding pollinator-friendly landscapes, and increasing tree canopy, were broadly supported, though some residents expressed concerns about pests, invasive species, and the long-term maintenance requirements of naturalized landscapes.

Environmental concerns featured prominently in responses. Residents expressed a high level of concern about sea level rise, flooding from both storms and groundwater rise, and the potential impacts of climate change on local biodiversity. Air quality and extreme heat were also identified as important issues. When asked about desired improvements, respondents prioritized expanded opportunities for walking and biking, more naturalized open spaces, and restoration of lagoon and shoreline habitats. The lagoon was viewed as both a recreational and community gathering space, valued for its boating and birdwatching opportunities as well as its role as an aesthetic and social focal point. These insights provided clear direction that both comfort amenities and ecological resilience should be central to policy development.

2.2 Pop-Up Events
Two pop-up events were held at the Off the Grid food truck event and Foster City Farmer’s Market to engage residents who might not otherwise attend formal meetings. The purpose of the pop-ups was to build awareness of the Element updates, introduce draft ideas, and invite casual, hands-on participation in shaping policy directions.

Each event featured three activities designed to spark dialogue and collect meaningful input.

The “What Did We Miss?” wall allowed participants to add sticky notes highlighting issues or opportunities they felt had been overlooked, resulting in comments that reinforced the need for shoreline restoration, expanded shade in parks, and continued attention to lagoon water quality.

A “Vision Wall” invited residents to describe their aspirations for Foster City’s future parks and open spaces. The responses created a collage of community visions centered on resilient natural areas, inclusive and family-friendly parks, and a stronger sense of connection to the lagoon and bayfront. Finally, a “Spin-the-Wheel” activity engaged participants of all ages in conversations about topics such as water conservation, local wildlife, and climate resilience, while also drawing attention to the range of strategies the City is considering.

More than 800 community members were reached through the pop-up events held for both the General Plan Updates and Parks Master Plan. The casual and interactive setting encouraged participation from families and residents who might not have engaged in a more traditional workshop, broadening the diversity of voices that informed the planning process.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

307

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 3
Feedback at the pop-ups consistently highlighted Leo J. Ryan Park as the community’s most valued and popular park, particularly for its waterfront access and role as a hub for events.

When asked what they would like to see more of, participants identified splash pads, expanded beach access, and additional trees and shaded areas as top priorities. Residents also voiced appreciation for the City’s existing parks, noting the cleanliness, sports facilities, and community events like the Fourth of July celebration as strengths. In terms of future vision, community members emphasized the need for new amenities, maintenance improvements, and more programming opportunities. Many expressed a desire for spaces that better support family- friendly recreation and opportunities for cultural and outdoor events. Across multiple pop-ups, participants also identified the need for improved restroom availability, especially in high-use parks and during large events.

Finally, while there was strong support for natural resource stewardship and rewilding concepts, some residents raised concerns about the potential for rewilding to attract additional Canada geese, which already create maintenance and usability challenges in waterfront parks.

Participants asked how the City might mitigate these impacts while still pursuing habitat restoration goals. This feedback underscores both enthusiasm for ecological improvements and the importance of balancing them with practical management strategies.

2.3 Joint Workshop
The joint workshop served as a central forum for presenting findings from the Parks Master Plan process and sharing draft concepts for the General Plan Element updates. The workshop was designed both to educate participants about the purpose of the updates and to collect detailed feedback on draft policies and design ideas.

The session began with an overview of existing conditions, followed by presentations of draft park design concepts and policy themes. Participants were then invited to engage directly with large-format boards displaying proposed improvements. Feedback from the workshop highlighted a desire for improved shade and seating, upgraded play areas, and more accessible trail connections. Residents also raised concerns about lagoon cleanliness and the impacts of geese on the usability of parks, reinforcing issues previously noted in the Community Priorities Survey, included as Attachment A to this report.

Regarding conservation topics, participants strongly supported habitat restoration, shoreline resilience, and educational opportunities related to environmental stewardship. Many emphasized the importance of incorporating nature-based solutions, such as living shorelines, into future flood protection projects. The workshop drew forty-six attendees, and the discussions underscored a recurring theme across engagement activities: residents want a balance between recreational opportunities and the protection of natural systems.

2.4 Focus Groups

2.4.1 Community Organizations Focus Group
The community organizations focus group was held on August 11, 2025, and brought together representatives from local groups that serve a variety of community needs. representatives from local groups serving a variety of recreational and community needs. Attendees included representatives from the Foster City Little League, Peninsula Youth Soccer Club, Peninsula Youth Bocce, the Rotary Club, and residents active in the City’s Sustainability Committee and bicycling community.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

308

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

4 The purpose of the focus group was to explore how updated policies could better address equity, access, and programming considerations within the parks and open space system.

Discussion was structured around a series of open-ended questions designed to draw on local knowledge and lived experience. Participants were asked whether the draft policies adequately addressed park accessibility disparities; what improvements and amenities should be prioritized; how well the Elements support inclusive, multigenerational programming; what types of indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities are most needed; whether the policies were strong enough to protect scenic, cultural, and tribal resources; and what role community groups might play in co-stewarding parks and open spaces.

Feedback emphasized the importance of equitable access to safe, well-maintained, and welcoming parks. Lighting was raised repeatedly as a concern for both sports groups and casual users, particularly at Sea Cloud and Catamaran Parks. Shade and seating were also identified as needs, especially for seniors and families. Specific requests included fences around bocce courts, improved goose management, more recycling receptacles, and expanded access to electricity in parks to support community events. Programming was discussed as being just as important as physical improvements, with calls for expanded indoor facilities for basketball, volleyball, and table tennis, and a general community space similar to the San Bruno recreation center. Attendees also expressed interest in playing a more active role in volunteer cleanups, stewardship, and programming, underscoring a strong commitment to civic pride and partnership.

2.4.2 Regional and Technical Non-Governmental Organizations Focus Group
The second focus group was held on August 13, 2025, and convened representatives from regional conservation organizations and technical experts, including the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter and Sustainable San Mateo County.

The discussion centered on opportunities for policy alignment and technical input on issues such as habitat connectivity, invasive species management, and coastal resilience. Questions posed to the group covered a range of themes: whether certain ecological areas or species within Foster City warrant greater policy attention; opportunities to enhance biodiversity and integrate habitat into park design; models for rewilding and approaches to implementing SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements; strategies for managing invasive species, particularly geese; whether draft policies adequately address stormwater quality, shoreline resilience, and sea level rise; and how Foster City can better align its efforts with regional conservation and data-sharing platforms.

Participants urged the City to take an ambitious approach to rewilding, restoration, and biodiversity protection, referencing state legislation such as SB 1425 and AB 1889. They pointed to nature-based shoreline protection as the most durable and ecologically beneficial strategy for a low-lying, waterfront community like Foster City. Invasive species management was highlighted as an ongoing challenge, with a call for collaborative programs that balance habitat protection with community expectations. The group emphasized that Foster City should strengthen partnerships with regional conservation entities and participate in shared data platforms to improve monitoring, implementation, and accountability.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

309

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 5

2.5 Senate Bill (SB) 18 Tribal Consultation Results
In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 18, the City of Foster City has consulted with California Native American tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with the planning area. The purpose of this consultation is to provide tribes an opportunity to engage in government-to- government dialogue with the City, to identify potential impacts on cultural resources, and to ensure that tribal perspectives are considered in the development of the Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements. This process recognizes the importance of tribal cultural resources and traditional knowledge in land use planning.

The SB 18 tribal consultation period was held from June 9 through August 13, 2025. During this period, the City of Foster City contacted nine tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the planning area. No requests for formal consultation were received. As a result, no additional revisions to the Parks and Open Space or Conservation Elements were required based on tribal input.

2.6 Public Comment Period
The draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements were made available for public review from August 8, 2025 through September 2, 2025. During this period, community members, local organizations, and other stakeholders had the opportunity to provide written comments and participate in public meetings held with the Planning Commission and City Council to share their perspectives on the proposed policies and strategies.

During the public comment period, community members provided a range of feedback on the draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Many comments focused on the condition and usability of existing park facilities. For example, residents noted issues with the design and accessibility of play equipment, raising concerns that swings and other structures were not appropriate for all ages. Suggestions were made to modify equipment to better accommodate children, parents, and caregivers, with an emphasis on safety and inclusivity.

Another recurring theme was the need to address lagoon- and shoreline-related challenges, particularly goose management and water quality. Commenters expressed that geese droppings significantly affect the cleanliness and comfort of waterfront parks, reinforcing the importance of continued habitat management strategies identified in the Elements. In addition, commenters called for expanded shade, seating, and restrooms to make parks more comfortable for daily use, especially for seniors and families.

Overall, the public comments were supportive of the direction outlined in the draft Elements, while offering specific, on-the-ground feedback about how proposed policies can translate into tangible improvements for everyday park experiences. These comments helped affirm key themes already identified through earlier engagement, such as comfort amenities, ecological health, and equitable access, while providing practical suggestions to guide implementation.

The comments and comment responses have been summarized in Table 1.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

310

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

6 Table 1 Public Comments
Commenter
Name Date Received Comment Summary Comment Response Page Number Public Comments
Nilofer
Motiwala August 14, 2025
The commenter states that they
would like to see all bathrooms
stocked with female sanitary
products.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

The commenter asks that cleanup
kits, especially the goose-poop kit,
be available on-site (not checked
out) to encourage use during
practices and activities.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

The commenter requests more
water-refill stations and modern
bottle-fill fountains across parks.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Evan Adams August 18, 2025
The commenter states that the
Lagoon is described as both a
major recreational and ecological
water body, which seems
inconsistent, and suggests
clarifying whether it is primarily
recreational or ecological.

The requested edits have been
incorporated.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 The commenter suggests noting
that the lagoon is approximately
213 acres in size to help in
planning, and recommends
referencing surface area as well as
ecological function.

The requested information
regarding the volume of water
held by the lagoon has been
added.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 7.1
Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

311

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 7
The commenter requests that the
City correct the term “Canadian
geese” to “Canada geese,” and
clarify that avian DNA, rather than
Canada goose DNA alone, has
been identified as impacting water
quality.
“Canadian geese” has been
corrected to “Canada geese” and
the statement regarding poor
lagoon water quality has been
corrected to more accurately
represent the cause of poor water
quality.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 The commenter suggests
specifying playgrounds by age
range, citing San Mateo and
Burlingame as examples, and
recommends including age-specific
playground types as available in
the Parks Master Plan.

The requested information is not
available at this time but comment
has been passed on to the Parks
and Recreation Department for
further review.

The commenter states that Foster
City has annexed Bay Trail land
and provides a link to the City’s
land use and zoning map. The
commenter notes that discussion of
privately owned property (APN
096-012-180) on Beach Park Blvd.
appears to be a zoning issue,
which is outside the scope of the
Parks Master Plan.

This comment has been noted.

Zoning is not within the scope of
this project.

The commenter states that there is
an existing volleyball court at
Boothbay Park and requests that
additional volleyball courts needed
in the future should be identified as
such.

The Element states that the City
would need to add one additional
volleyball court, accounting for the
existing court available at
Boothbay Park.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

312

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

8 The commenter states that adding
further shade trees will contribute
to mitigating the Canada goose
population which could have
cascading positive impacts on
water quality. The commenter
notes the low prevalence of geese
at parks with greater volumes of
trees.

The comment has been noted.

Please refer to the Parks Master
Plan for additional information on
park design. Additionally,
Implementation Program POS-c
supports additional tree plantings
in parks.

The commenter asks whether the
golf course could be legally
converted to a park.

The comment has been noted for
City consideration.

The commenter suggests that
references to staffing standards
should be footnoted or rephrased
as best practice benchmarks rather
than City facilities, as using them in
the plan may be misleading.

Please refer to the Parks Master
Plan for more detail on park
staffing and maintenance.

The commenter asks whether
FEMA and NOAA map data used in
the document are the most up-to-
date, and suggests ensuring
correct and current sources.

The maps provided in the Parks
and Open Space Assessment
and Parks and Open Space
Element utilize data that is
currently available. Localized data
reflecting the upgraded levee is
not available at this time.

The commenter asks that the City
reference the data set used to
ensure it is current and state the
range. The commenter suggests
that the flood inundation map is
inaccurate for San Mateo County.

The maps provided in the Parks
and Open Space Assessment
and Parks and Open Space
Element utilize data that is
currently available. Localized data
reflecting the upgraded levee is
not available at this time.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

313

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 9
Andreia
Colombo August 25, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Tatiana Gotze August 25, 2025
The commenter states that the
swing structures at Turnstone Park
are not designed at appropriate
heights. They note the adult swings
are too high due to short chains,
and the green swing chair for an
adult and child is also too high,
preventing safe use. The
commenter suggests adding longer
chains to resolve these issues,
recommends adding an infant
swing (acknowledging it may
require removing another swing),
and observes that the current setup
is underutilized and potentially
unsafe, citing an example of a
parent pushing a baby in the green
swing instead of sitting with the
child.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Raissa Villea August 26, 2025
The commenter requests to
reserve one of the beach courts for
beach tennis on certain days of the
week.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Isadora Castro
Lemos August 26, 2025
The commenter proposes that the
City support beach tennis activities
by allowing existing sand courts to
be used for beach tennis during
certain time slots.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

314

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

10 Tais Perpetuo August 26, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Sandra
Oliveira August 26, 2025
The commenter requests City
support in making Boothbay Park’s
courts more accessible and
inclusive for the community.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Cintia
Fernandes August 26, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Dave Rozzi August 28, 2025
The commenter asks if a
community pool is being
considered.

The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

Audrey
Silverman August 30, 2025
The commenter states that the
swing structures at Turnstone Park
are not designed at appropriate
heights. They note the adult swings
are too high due to short chains,
and the green swing chair for an
adult and child is also too high,
preventing safe use. The
commenter suggests adding longer
chains to resolve these issues,
recommends adding an infant
swing (acknowledging it may
require removing another swing),
and observes that the current setup
is underutilized and potentially
unsafe, citing an example of a
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

315

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 11
parent pushing a baby in the green
swing instead of sitting with the
child.

Evan Adams September 5,
2025
The commenter submitted an
external comment received by the
City Council which included a 3D
model of recommended
improvements to Edgewater Park.

The original model and submission
were made by Yiming Luo. Luo
submits several questions
regarding the Parks Master Plan.

The comment has been noted
and has been passed to the
Parks and Recreation Department
and Parks Master Plan consultant
team for further review.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

316

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

12 Focus Group Comments
Foster City
Little League,
Bocce Ball
community,
Cycling
community,
Peninsula
Youth Soccer,
CSAC, Rotary,
Boating
community
August 11, 2025
• Need to consider boat
access to land around
Foster City - access to
parks, shopping,
restaurants. Foster City has
a lot of boaters who like to
park their boats to access
community amenities.
• Parks are generally
accessible to those who
want to use them.
• We need better lighting in
most of the parks to make
them safer at night.
• Need better lighting at
Catamaran so that youth
can play soccer in the
evening during the winter.
• Improved shade structures
are needed at Booth Bay
Park, Catamaran Park.
• Gate at Catamaran Park
can be problematic - needs
replacing or a section that
opens or both. It is good for
helping to deter the geese
but if a ball goes over the
fence it's tough to retrieve it.

Also, geese have gotten
"stuck" on the park side of
the fence ; having a section
that opens would be helpful.
• Bocce Ball courts need
more fencing and benches
as well as shading.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

317

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 13
• Outdoor electricity can be a
problem for outdoor events.

Need outdoor service and
ability to plug in multiple
appliances (such as
coffeemakers).
• There is a lack of indoor
recreation facilities in FC.

The ones that exist require
too much coordination.

Would like space for indoor
basketball, volleyball,
events.
• Goose poop is a problem
getting to the track
(Catamaran); a pathway
could help to avoid stepping
on goose poop.
• Groups will be happy to
help with educational
events (Peninsula Youth
Soccer).
• Peninsula Youth Soccer
provides incentives to their
coaches to get to the fields
early to clean up goose
poop.
• Could the City build indoor
space (other than the Rec
Center) at one of the parks?
• If steps down to the water
are still being considered for
the amphitheater location,
please be sure to consider
safety, liability, especially
during amphitheater events.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

318

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

14 Susan Lessin,
Sierra Club
Loma Prieta
Chapter and
Mollie Carter,
Sustainable
San Mateo
County.

August 13, 2025
• The reports were well done.

Maps were helpful. The
following issues and areas
of interest were raised by
attendees:
• Tree canopy - Foster City
has one of the lowest tree
canopy percentages in the
region; adding details on
natural plants and drought
resistant plants would be
helpful for this section. San
Mateo has a Green Streets
program that might be worth
reviewing.
• Coastal Flooding - Foster
City has the highest risk of
coastal flooding in San
Mateo County.
• Air Quality - FC is on the
high end of the spectrum
with a score of 2.5 for
particulate matter.
• EV Charging - need more
focus on multi-family and
public charging access; the
County as a whole is
lacking in access.

Sustainable SMC wants to
support FC's efforts to add
more charging
opportunities. Could the
City offer incentives for
installation of multifamily
charging stations?

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

319

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 15
• Didn't see electrification of
municipal buildings in the
draft element. Della
explained that much of this
is covered in the CAP.
• OneShoreline is the most
important entity with respect
to addressing sea level rise;
there may be concepts in
their Ideas Bank that could
be applied. Also,
OneShoreline could be
helpful with a range of other
issues associated with sea
level rise in addition to
levees.
• Geese management - didn't
see the plan referenced.
• Last mile, electrification,
EVs, EV chargers were all
mentioned in the CAP. It
might be helpful to include a
bit more on these issues in
the Element.
• Vertical levees vs.
horizontal levees: vertical
levees lead to rising
groundwater, subsidence.
• Bird boxes - has FC
considered them?
• Water Qualify - The Sierra
Club is hoping that data on
water quality will be
included in quarterly reports
on geese management. E-
coli is an issue that needs

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

320

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

16 to be addressed because it
limits access to the water.
• Goose feces - The Sierra
Club would like to see a
more aggressive plan for
picking up goose feces and
is concerned that spraying
feces with water will have a
negative effect on water
quality.
• Sea level rise - The Sierra
Club is supportive of a
regional approach
(mentioned by
Councilmembers Kiesel and
Sullivan).
• Regional approach to
issues - there is a need for
coordinating with other
jurisdictions, such as
Belmont, Redwood City,
and San Mateo regarding
geese; there might be
additional opportunities for
cross-collaboration through
county committees and
groups such as CCAG and
for transportation.

Attendees acknowledged
that FC has limitations due
to not being on a Caltrain
line. Is there additional
funding through CCAG for
shuttles? Is there any
additional talk of a ferry line
from Foster City? Last mile

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

321

Engagement Activity Results

Engagement Results Summary 17
issue comes into play. The
Sierra Club is against
hovercrafts due to the
pollution they cause.
• Rewilding - balancing act
for built out environments.

Coyotes create problems
for walkers as well as the
geese. The coyotes are
very used to people and
don't run off. There is good
signage about coyotes in
Foster City; used to have
signs regarding feral cats.
• Bicycle paths - Most paths
are on streets; designated
pathways for bicycles would
be helpful - see San
Mateo's Green Streets
program and Menlo Park.

Other questions
• Recreation Center - is it
going to be solar-powered?
The Sierra Club
recommends no gas and
solar powering of the
building. They asked if we
could explore getting a
grant from Peninsula Clean
Energy to get on a micro-
grid so Foster City's Rec
Center is not dependent on
PG&E in the event of an
outage since the facility will
likely be used for an

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

322

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

18 emergency center/shelter in
an emergency. Noted that
Burlingame's new
community center used the
same architect as the Rec
Center. The Burlingame
center is a very good
model.
• How often is water quality
tested?

Other issues raised
• The pictures included for
the new community center
include people engaging
with and accessing the
water. Ties into water
quality testing and plans.
• The Sierra Club's CAP
committee sent a letter to
FC regarding the CAP.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

323

Conclusion

Engagement Results Summary 19
3 Conclusion
Taken together, the survey, pop-up events, workshop, and focus groups created a robust picture of Foster City’s community priorities. Residents consistently emphasized the dual importance of enhancing everyday park experiences through shade, seating, lighting, and play spaces, while also addressing larger environmental challenges related to habitat restoration, shoreline resilience, and climate change. Regional experts and local organizations reinforced these themes and added perspectives on equity, collaboration, and technical approaches to conservation.

This input has been instrumental in shaping the draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements, ensuring that they reflect both community aspirations and regional best practices.

The forthcoming tribal consultation and public comment period will provide additional layers of review and dialogue, continuing the collaborative process that is central to this update.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

324

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

20 This page intentionally left blank.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

325

Appendix A
Community Priorities Survey Results

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

326

Community Priorities Survey Results

Engagement Results Summary A-1

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

327

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

A-2

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

328

Community Priorities Survey Results

Engagement Results Summary A-3

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

329

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

A-4

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

330

Community Priorities Survey Results

Engagement Results Summary A-5

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

331

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

A-6

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

332

Community Priorities Survey Results

Engagement Results Summary A-7

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

333

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element

A-8

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

334

Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-9

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

335

Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Engagement Results Summary
Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Vice Chair
Stoveland August 14, 2025
Raised concerns about ensuring
the Parks and Open Space
Element does not conflict too
strongly with the Housing Element.

He referenced POS-F under the
Implementation Program, which
states that as Foster City grows,
the City will strive to maintain its
existing park acreage level of
service (LOS) of 3.2 acres per
thousand residents. He provided
that the surrounding cities have an
LOS of 2.8 acres, and in order to
experience the expected growth
between now and 2040, an
additional 12.9 acres of park space
would need to be included in order
to maintain the 3.2 LOS. He
suggested either remaining at the
current acreage or slightly below to
ensure that the city has room for
the Housing Element obligations.

The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.

Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Asked if the acreage requirement
should be defined now. He
referenced that the City is moving
towards more objective standards
and having this dissonance could
create unnecessary challenges for
potential developers.

The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.

Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

336

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Asked about the calculation behind

12.9 acres if the population is
expected to go up by 2040. He
suggested setting the goal at the
current acres per thousand
residents. He recommended
against setting it at 2.8 and
cautioned that 3.2 might not be
sustainable.

Language around park LOS has
been updated in the Element to
maintain existing acreage and
consider the appropriate metric at
a future time.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Stated that his preferred approach
is to define the numbers to reach
the RHNA goals while still meeting
the needs of the community.

The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.

Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 Referenced page 34, which stated
that there is a lack of a formal
management plan related to the
maintenance of the parks and
referenced page 43, which speaks
of high-quality maintenance, a
funding strategy, and plan
engagement proactively. He asked
how the realization came about that
there is no formal maintenance
plan for the parks.

Question was answered in
meeting. Additionally, the Parks
and Open Space Element points
to the Parks Master Plan as the
vehicle for further addressing
maintenance strategies and
acknowledges ongoing efforts to
improve maintenance planning.

Commissioner
Jagtiani August 14, 2025
Asked if the levee is counted
towards the 3.2 LOS
The Parks and Open Space
Element LOS calculation is based
on City-owned parks and does
not currently include the levee
system.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

337

Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Engagement Results Summary
Suggested including how much
acreage that private parks, such as
HOAs, amounts to
This comment was noted and
referred to the Parks and
Recreation Department and Parks
Master Plan consultant team.

Private facilities are not included
in the LOS calculation for the
General Plan, but their role in
overall recreation opportunities is
acknowledged.

Chair Pedro August 14, 2025
Clarified whether the option to
include the active levee space
would be the City’s to make. He
furthered that it would be a benefit
to include those spaces in the ratio.

Determination of whether to count
levee space toward LOS will
require further policy direction
from the City Council and
coordination with regional
agencies.

Asked if the lagoon acres were
included in the park space acreage.

He noted that the report states that
there are 133 acres of parks and
218 acres of lagoon.

The Parks and Open Space
Element clarifies that lagoon
acreage is not included in the
park LOS but is addressed
separately as a unique
recreational and ecological
resource.

Suggested that there be looser
language used in the elements. He
also asked if the dredging refers to
the dumping of what has been
dredged.

Language was adjusted for
flexibility to avoid prescriptive
standards. References to
dredging were clarified to ensure
accuracy of terminology regarding
sediment removal and
management.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 Committee
Chair Tiwari August 14, 2025
Asked if they are looking to adopt a
formal and measurable standard.

The Parks and Open Space
Element clarifies that measurable
standards may be established
through future planning
processes.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
34 (see

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

338

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Program POS-
g)
Asked what the process would be
for defining the objective numbers
for acreage.

Future opportunities, such as
Parks Master Plan updates,
budget decisions, and Council
direction, will be the vehicles for
defining objective standards.

Asked if there is a balance between
supporting rewilding while
addressing concerns about pests,
usability, and upkeep.

Policies and programs included in
the Parks and Open Space
Element highlight both the
ecological benefits of rewilding
and the need to manage
maintenance, pests, and usability.

Implementation programs support
adaptive management strategies
to strike this balance.

Committee
Me
mber Ryzak August 14, 2025
Stated that the attractiveness of the
parks should be discussed
alongside the technical
components of the element.

Narrative language was added to
emphasize that parks provide
both technical functions (e.g.,
flood protection, habitat value)
and community benefits such as
beauty, identity, and quality of life.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
6 and 21

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

339

C
ity Council Comments
Engagement Results Summary
City Council Comments
Councilmember
Venkat September 2, 2025
Referred to the issue raised by
Planning Commissioner Stoveland
regarding the LOS requirement of

3.2 acres per thousand residents,
or 12.9 additional acres are needed
by 2040. Will this requirement
interfere with housing
development?
The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.

Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Had questions regarding artificial
turf.

Evaluation of turf options will be
considered in future facility
planning and Parks Master Plan
discussions, not within the scope
of the General Plan Elements.

Liked the inclusion of the climate
resilience goals and nature-based
strategies and other community
health benefits as the population
continues to age.

Appreciation noted. The Elements
retain and strengthen climate
resilience goals, nature-based
strategies, and health co-benefits.

Would like to prioritize a citywide
tree inventory and mentioned that
San Mateo has one, or potentially
hiring an arborist. Supports these
efforts.

The request is acknowledged.

Tree canopy expansion and
monitoring are supported through
Element policies, and a citywide
inventory is identified as a
potential implementation tool.

Councilmember
Sullivan September 2, 2025
Raised concerns about Sea Cloud
II regarding dredging material
placement if Sea Cloud II is used
for other parks and open space
uses as Sea Cloud II has been
used in the past for placement of
dredging material.

The City will evaluate the site as
an option if future dredge sites
are needed and Council will
determine path forward. This
effort is outside the scope of the
Elements but will inform future
planning.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

340

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Raised the issue of sediment
management as a way to reduce
dredging requirements. Suggested
filtering Bay water to reduce
sediment.

While the Elements do not
prescribe specific filtration
technologies, sediment and
dredging concerns are captured
under policies addressing lagoon
health and long-term water
quality.

Expressed that the major concern
is the environment and the
waterways. Does not want to
overlook the major environmental
issues – dredging, lagoons, water
quality.

The Elements include policies to
protect waterways, address
dredging, and improve lagoon
water quality. Broader concerns
are acknowledged and will guide
future implementation and
coordination with regional
agencies.

Councilmember
Niederhofer September 2, 2025
Noted missing elements from some
of the entries in the parks inventory
(Table 1) and requested Parks &
Rec review the table before
finalizing the report.

WRT reviewed and refined Table
1 for accuracy. Table 1 in the
Parks and Open Space Element
has been updated to better reflect
the major facilities at each park.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
8-9
Recommended revising strong
wording in policies (e.g., “ensure”)
to lighter alternatives like
“promote”, “create”, or “aspire to.”
Strong prescriptive wording was
revised to alternatives such as
“promote” or “support,” consistent
with the Council’s direction.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
31-36
Vice Mayor
Kiesel September 2, 2025
Noted that the level of detail was
sufficient and would be awaiting the
final Elements.

Comment acknowledged. Staff
will finalize the Elements with the
level of detail deemed sufficient
by Council.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

341

C
ity Council Comments
Engagement Results Summary
Mayor Jimenez September 2, 2025
Found implementation programs
starting on Page 46 a bit vague.

Requested an explanation on how
the programs came into play.

Rincon explained that the elements
are 20–30-year documents and
that the goal is to make them
specific enough to create a work
plan and open enough to account
for changes that happen over the
next decade or so. Director
Mangalam also explained that the
tasks will be reported to the State
every year and that the programs
were discussed in detail with the
departments. Mayor Jimenz
requested clarification on
definitions of long-term, mid-term,
and short-term to be added to the
Elements. Mayor Jimenez would
like to see some of the long-term
goals done sooner.

Director Mangalam explained that
there is flexibility within the
timeframes. A footnote was
added to the implementation
tables in both Elements defining
short-term as 1-5 years, mid-term
as 6-10 years, and long-term as
10+ years.

Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
36 Inquired as to whether other cities’
experiences were considered in the
drafting of the Elements.

Experiences from nearby cities
and regional entities such as
OneShoreline and San Mateo
County have been incorporated
into policy development.

Stressed that the document should
turn into an active strategic plan,
with clear goals and clear policies,
not a shelf document.

The Elements highlight their role
as active strategic documents,
with clear policies, timelines for
implementation, and ongoing
reporting requirements.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

342

City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Highlighted need for more tree
cover working within the budget
that we have.

The Elements emphasize tree
canopy expansion and shade
improvements, recognizing fiscal
realities and aligning goals with
budget priorities.

Asked if we would be looking at
sites such as the golf course and
Sea Cloud II. Director Mangalam
emphasized that future studies
would be brought to City Council
through a study session.

The Elements do not designate
future land use for these sites, but
staff confirmed that such
decisions will be evaluated in
dedicated studies brought to
Council.

Asked about coordination with San
Mateo and Redwood Shores.

Regional coordination is
incorporated into policies,
ensuring alignment with adjacent
jurisdictions and regional
agencies.

7.1 Attachment 6 - Engagement Results Summary

343

RESOLUTION NO. P - 12 - 25

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REPEAL THE 2009 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE 2025

PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AND FINDING THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE

ELEMENT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a general plan contains the community vision for future growth, California law also requires each general plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302; and
WHEREAS, the mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are Land Us e, Circulation,
Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety; and WHEREAS, Foster City’s Parks and Open S pace Element was l ast adopted in September 2009; and
WHEREAS, the State Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, LCI (previously known as the Office of Planning and Research or OPR) recommends comprehensively updating a General Plan every 10- 15 years to reflect changes in community values, economic conditions, and emerging issues and challenges; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1425 requires that the Open Space Element be updated by January 1, 2026, with expanded requirements including consideration of climate resilience in coordination with the Safety Element; and WHEREAS, SB 1425 also explicitly focuses on "rewilding opportunities," or creating and preserving open space networks to support biological and recreational uses; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 1889 requires the General Plan Conservation Element to consider the effect of development within the jurisdiction on the movement of wildlife and habitat connectivity; and
WHEREAS, AB 1889 requires the Conservation Element, upon the next update of one or more elements on or after January 1, 2028, to, among other things, identify and analyze connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscape areas within the jurisdiction, identify and an alyze existing or planned wildlife passage features, and consider the impacts of development and the barriers caused by development to wildlife, as defined, and habitat connectivity; and
WHEREAS, to ensure compliance with SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements in a timely manner, the City of Foster City began work on updating the two (2) Elements, including the Parks and Open Space Element, and Conservation Element; and

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

344

WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.4 require that before a legislative body takes action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency shall refer the proposed action to a number of entities or conduct consultations with California Native American tribes that are on the contact list. The City has referred the Parks and Open Space Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission; and WHEREAS, no California Native American Tribe has requested consultation; and WHEREAS, the City conducted extensive community outreach, including one (1) joint workshop, two (2) focus groups, two (2) pop- up events, a dedicated webpage, and one (1) community priorities survey and social media, e-news, emails, and notices; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 202 5, the City published an administrative draft of the Parks and Open Space Element and requested public comment on the draft until September 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65353, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65354, the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2025, a public hearing notice was published in the newspaper (Foster City Islander) and posted in three public places pursuant to California Government Code Section 65090 for the Planning Commission public hearing on October 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider this Resolution regarding the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element, reviewed the Element and all pertinent documents and exhibits, staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission hereby finds that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.

2. The proposed project conforms to the provisions and standards of the General Plan in that the proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

345

3. The proposed General Plan Amendment complies with, and is required by, applicable State law.

4. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City. The amendments will ensure Foster City’s General Plan is consistent with current state law . The updated Element establishes the City’s vision, goals, policies, and implementation programs for how its recreational and natural areas, including parks, natural open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enriched.

5. The City, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has completed analysis, and the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and 2025 Conservation Element and determined that the Updates are exempt from the California Environmental Q uality Act (CEQA) based on the “common sense exemption” in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which applies if it can be seen with certainty that a project will not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. The Updates involve the adoption of policy documents to establish the City’s vision, goals, policies, and programs for the provisioning and management of natural and recreational areas within the city, as well as the protection of natural and cultural resources. These policy documents, in and of themselves, do not include any proposed projects or development. The Updates do not propose or approve any physical development and will not result in changes to the physical environment, nor will they result in potential environmental impacts.

To the extent that the Updates do identify potential future projects or development, those would be analyzed if and when the City approves those projects in accordance with CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Foster City therefore recommends that the City Council repeal the 2009 Parks and Open Space Element and adopt the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element as set forth in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference and attached hereto.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

346

PASSED
AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Foster City at the Regular Meeting held on the 2nd day of October 2025, by the following vote:

AYES,
COMMISSIONERS:

NOES, COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAIN, COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS:
___
_______________________

ROBERT PEDRO, CHAIR
A
TTEST:
___
________________________

SOFIA MANGALAM, SECRETARY
Haddad, Jagtiani, Kenkre, and Chair Pedro
Stoveland
Robert Pedro (Oct 3, 2025 16:25:00 PDT)
Robert Pedro

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

347

EXHIBIT A
Parks and Open Space Element – Final Clean Version

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

348

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 1
Parks and Open Space Introduction

Boardwalk along the Foster City Lagoon near Leo J. Ryan Park, a central open space known for its scenic waterfront and community gathering areas Foster City, 2025.

Purpose
The Parks and Open Space Element fulfills the State’s requirements for an Open Space Element while also establishing Foster City’s vision to how its natural and recreational areas, including parks, natural open space, facilities, and recreation programs, are developed, maintained, and enriched.

The Parks and Open Space Element leverages the city’s parks and open space areas as a vital framework for community wellbeing and natural stewardship. It guides the use of parks and open spaces for recreation, social connection, and enrichment, and plays a role in building resilience to natural hazards such as flooding and extreme heat. By weaving these aspects together, the City can enhance livability for all residents and foster deeper relationships with Foster City’s natural environment.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key trends related to parks, open space, and recreation. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for parks, open space, and recreation. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

349

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 2
Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

While these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Legal Requirements
The Parks and Open Space Element of the General Plan is guided by state law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, promote ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(e) – Open Space Element Requirements
California Government Code §65302(e) requires all general plans to include an Open Space Element that addresses the long-term preservation of open space lands. This includes open space for natural resource protection, outdoor recreation, hazard mitigation (such as flood and fire zones), and the production of resources like agriculture. Additional considerations include open space that supports military readiness or protects tribal resources.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

350

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 3
Quimby Act
Government Code §66477, known as the Quimby Act, allows cities and counties to require residential subdivisions to dedicate land or pay in-lieu fees for park and recreational purposes. These dedications or fees are then used to fund new park and open space development in consideration of population growth necessitating additional public open spaces.

Public Park Preservation Act
The Public Park Preservation Act (§5400–§5409) restricts the sale, lease, or disposal of public parkland unless a replacement of equivalent size and function is provided. This protects publicly accessible parks from being converted to non-recreational uses without due process and community benefit.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of open spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities. The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Parks and Open Space Element must be aligned with regional priorities and local planning efforts. On the regional scale, open space planning is often coordinated through countywide or multi-jurisdictional strategies. For Foster City, relevant partners include OneShoreline, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), each of which plays a role in guiding land use and resource conservation within the San Francisco Bay Area. These agencies provide policy guidance and mapping resources that help local governments identify priority areas for natural infrastructure, shoreline buffers, habitat corridors, and sea level rise adaptation.

At the local level, the Parks and Open Space Element provides the overarching vision implemented by Foster City’s Parks Master Plan and Capital Improvement Program. These documents identify specific opportunities for acquiring, improving, and maintaining parks and recreational spaces in alignment with the vision of the Parks and Open Space Element. The Element also integrates the City’s broader environmental goals, such as climate resilience, stormwater management, and habitat restoration by incorporating nature-based solutions and equitable access principles into the design and stewardship of

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

351

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 4
open spaces. The alignment between regional frameworks and local initiatives ensures that Foster City’s open space planning supports both community priorities and broader environmental sustainability goals.

Several local and regional plans and programs provide additional guidance and are referenced throughout this Element. Brief descriptions are provided below to give context when these plans are mentioned.
• The Parks Master Plan was developed concurrently with this Element, the Parks Master Plan provides a detailed systemwide analysis of park conditions, recreational needs, and community priorities. It includes site-specific recommendations, amenity standards, and an implementation strategy to guide future investments.
• The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies, prioritizes, and funds infrastructure projects, including park and open space improvements.
• The Lagoon Management Plan provides policies and actions for long-term stewardship pf the City’s lagoon system, including water quality monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The Plan also addresses ecological concerns such as runoff, algal blooms, and wildlife impacts, ensuring the lagoon remains a safe, healthy, and enjoyable resource for recreation and habitat. • The Integrated Canada Goose Population Management Plan establishes strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreational use. This plan complements the Lagoon Management Plan by addressing a major source of non-point pollution and nuisance conditions. • The Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan (2026) will guide the creation of a connected network of trails and bikeways that link parks, open spaces, neighborhoods, and the Levee Pedway. The Plan will aim to support active transportation, recreation, and access to natural areas.

Relationship to the Foster City Parks Master Plan
The update to the Parks and Open Space Element was developed concurrently with the 2025 Parks Master Plan. These two documents are closely linked; the Parks and Open Space Element establishes a citywide vision and high-level framework to guide the planning, development, and stewardship of Foster City’s parks, recreational facilities, and open space resources. As shown in Figure 1, the Parks Master Plan builds on this foundation with a more detailed assessment of community needs and priorities. The Parks Master Plan includes specific recommendations and an implementation strategy to help realize the City's long-term vision and ensure that parks and open spaces continue to support both ecological functions and community well-being.

Because these efforts were conducted in parallel, much of the detailed community engagement and needs assessment from the Parks Master Plan has been integrated into this Element, further strengthening its vision and policy framework for the future of parks and open space in Foster City.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

352

Parks and Open Space Introduction

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 5
Figure 1 Relationship Between the Parks and Open Space Element and the Parks Master Plan

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

353

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 6
Background
The update process for the Parks and Open Space Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions, featuring both a systemwide analysis that covered level of service, access, connectivity, usage, and amenities, as well as detailed evaluations of individual park sites. As shown in Figure 2, extensive community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan, ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of both the Parks Master Plan and this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Parks and Open Space Element.

Figure 2 Community Engagement Overview

Parks and Open Space System
Parks
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 3, Foster City has approximately 113 acres of publicly accessible parks and open spaces that shape the city’s recreational and ecological landscape. Many of these spaces are notable for features such as well-maintained landscaping, lagoon and bayfront views, shaded picnic areas, and family-friendly playgrounds that encourage regular use. The city is anchored by four large community parks, Leo J. Ryan Park, Sea Cloud Park, Boothbay Park, and Edgewater Park, which offer a wide range of amenities such as sports fields and courts, playgrounds, and group picnic areas that attract diverse users from across the community. Leo J. Ryan Park serves as a hub for major community events and is the site of Foster City’s new community center. The center will offer flexible spaces and upgraded amenities to better serve residents’ needs.

In addition to community parks, Foster City is home to a network of smaller neighborhood and mini parks nestled within residential areas. These parks provide everyday recreational opportunities and are

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

354

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 7
designed to meet the specific needs of nearby residents. The city also includes three special-use parks dedicated to unique recreational activities such as windsurfing and dog play.

Foster City’s park system includes large community parks like Sea Cloud Park (left), popular neighborhood parks like Catamaran (middle) and mini parks that serve local needs, like Ketch Park (right).

Open Space
Foster City contains a diverse range of open spaces that enhance environmental quality and provide recreational and ecological value. In addition to the 24 parks, the city includes approximately 22 acres of publicly accessible open space along trails and 41 acres of open space with restricted access, much of which consists of sensitive habitat along the levee system and protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Public access is generally discouraged as these areas consist of sensitive habitat along the levee pedway. The shorelines along the Belmont Slough are protected as a part of the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. The CDFW oversees the ecological health and wildlife protection in the area. Natural areas like the Belmont Slough offer scenic trails and habitat for wildlife, and the city features the Foster City Lagoon, described further below. The lagoon primarily supports drainage and water-based recreation, and has some ecological value.

Water Bodies
The Foster City Lagoon is a major recreational feature and is central to the community’s identity. The Lagoon covers approximately 218 acres, holding approximately 1,300 acre-feet of water, and winds through several neighborhoods in Foster City, fronting many of the City’s parks and open spaces.

Residents engage in water-based recreational activities such as kayaking, paddling, and boating, and the Lagoon is central to many Foster City community events. Water testing in the lagoon has detected avian DNA, and while the lagoon supports a large Canada Geese population, the results cannot be traced specifically to geese or to any single location. Nevertheless, the presence of Canada Geese contributes to ongoing challenges with cleanliness and maintenance. Outside of designated beach areas, water quality is generally similar to bay water.

Just as important, the San Francisco Bay creates an enhanced experience for people using the Levee Pedway and Bay-adjacent parks such as Baywinds, Gateshead, Shorebird, and Bridgeview. The San Francisco Bay is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. The Bay also offers a wide range of recreational opportunities, including kayaking, sailing, birdwatching, and waterfront trails, making it a vital natural and cultural resource that connects communities to the region’s environmental heritage while promoting outdoor access and stewardship.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

355

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 8

The Foster City Lagoon (left and middle) and the San Franscico Bay are important recreational assets in the community.

Trails
Wrapping around the perimeter of Foster City’s waterfront edge is the Levee Pedway. This multi-use pathway is a segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail, and serves as a recreational asset for people walking, jogging, and biking. The trail runs past several parks and open spaces while also providing a continuous path without requiring on-street travel. In addition to the Levee Pedway, neighborhood trails provide local connections throughout Foster City. The Levee Pedway and other trails in Foster City are managed by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, which oversees maintenance and improvements to support safe, accessible routes for walking, biking, and recreation.

The Levee Pedway (left and middle) is a heavily-used regional route that is supported by the City’s local neighborhood trails (right, source: Google Streetview).

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

356

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 9
Table 1 Parks and Open Space Inventory
Park Number Acres Major Amenities
Community Parks 4 64.7
Boothbay 11.2 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Volleyball Court, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Edgewater 8.5 Playground, Ballfield, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Courts, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Leo J Ryan 20.7 Basketball Court, Pickleball Courts, Bocce Ball Courts, Tennis Courts, Beach, Boat Launch
Sea Cloud 24 Playground, Ballfields, Soccer/Multipurpose Fields, Restroom, Picnic Shelter
Neighborhood Parks 10 33.7
Catamaran 5.9 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Tennis Court, Volleyball Courts, Restroom
Erckenbrack 3.5 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Farragut 3.9 Playground, Restroom
Gull 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Kildeer 2.4 Playground
Marlin 3.1 Playground, Restroom, Beach
Port Royal 4.0 Playground, Basketball Court, Soccer/Multipurpose Field, Restroom, Parking Lot
Shad 2.1 Playground, Basketball Court, Restroom
Shorebird 3.5 Restroom
Sunfish 2.4 Playground, Basketball Court
Mini Parks 8 7.5
Arcturus 0.8 Playground
Gateshead 0.7 None
Ketch 1.6 Playground, Basketball Court
Leo 0.1 None
Pompano 0.5 None
Turnstone 1.5 Playground, Basketball Court
Town Center Park* 1.1 None
Pilgrim Triton* 1.2 Playground, Picnic Area
Special Use Parks 3 7.7
Bridgeview 3.2 Restroom, Parking Lot
Baywinds 1.3 Restroom, Shower
Boat/Dog 3.2 Restroom, Boat Launch, Dog Park, Parking Lot Subtotal, Parks 25 113.6
Open Space

63 Publicly Accessible Open Space

22 Restricted Access Open Space

41 Lagoon

218

*Pilgrim Triton and Town Center Park are private parks, but are publicly accessible.

Source: City of Foster City 2025.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

357

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 10
Figure 3 Foster City Parks & Open Spaces

Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

358

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 11
Park Access
As shown in Figure 4, all of Foster City’s residential neighborhoods are within a 10-minute walk of a park, an aspirational standard that many cities struggle to achieve. While there are portions of the City that are beyond a 10-minute walk from a park, these are primarily employment areas.

Demographic patterns offer insight into how park access and recreational resources can best serve the community. In central Foster City, particularly along the Foster City Boulevard corridor, a larger population of older adults (65 and over) presents an opportunity to enhance amenities and programs that support seniors. Youth, by contrast, are more evenly spread throughout the city, although central neighborhoods overall tend to have the highest population density. Park access is generally well- distributed across all racial and income groups. While Foster City’s population is predominantly Asian and/or White, there are no distinct clusters of culturally specific communities that would require targeted outreach or specialized facilities.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

359

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 12
Figure 4 Foster City Park Walksheds

Source: City of Foster City, County of San Mateo Open Data portal, 2024.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

360

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 13
Park Acreage
Park acreage level of service (LOS) measures the availability of parks and recreational facilities relative to a community’s population, helping promote equitable access and adequate resources. As shown in Table 2, Foster City currently offers 3.2 acres of developed park land per 1,000 residents, which is somewhat higher than the average of similar local communities. The Parks and Open Space Element recommends maintaining the existing developed parkland acreage of 113.6 acres. The City could explore adding additional parkland by exploring conversion of Sea Cloud II site, as discussed in detail below (see Opportunity Sites). It shall be noted that the LOS in 2040 with additional growth and without additional parkland would be 2.9.

As Foster City grows, the Parks and Open Space Element also recommends establishing an appropriate LOS balances future housing and community preference.

Table 2 Park Acreage Level of Service
City Acres
Publicly
Accessible
Private Acres Total Acres
Current Level of
Service (LOS)
(acres/1000
residents)
Local Average
LOS1 (acres/1000
residents)
Parks 110.6 2.3 113.6 3.2 2.8
Open Space 22.0 0 22.0 0.6 NA
Grand Total 132.6 2.3 135.6 3.8 NA
Recreation Amenities
Table 3 summarizes the inventory of recreation amenities in Foster City’s parks, indicates existing level of service for these amenities, and establishes recreation amenity standards based on local and national trends, as well as Foster City’s unique needs. Foster City provides a high level of service for most major recreational amenities, particularly multi-use fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and playgrounds. By 2040, additional amenities needed to meet projected demand include at least four pickleball courts, one volleyball court, and four reservable picnic shelters. This analysis focuses on traditional park amenities commonly tracked by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). However, it does not capture other important community needs, such as trails, shade trees, walking paths within parks, community gardens, and more, which were highlighted through community engagement (see Engagement Results for Parks and Open Space).

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

361

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 14
Table 3 Park Recreation Amenity Level of Service
Amenity Inventory
Current LOS
(pop. per
amenity)
Local
Average
LOS 1
(pop. per
amenity)
National
Average
LOS
(pop. per
amenity) 2
Priority
Investment
Rating
(PIR)3
LOS
Standard
(pop. per
amenity)
2040
Additional
Amenities
Needed
Diamond Field 10 3,500 4,878 3,007 Low 4,000 0
Soccer
Multipurpose
Field
12 2,917 8,212 3,333 Low 4,000 0
Basketball Court 8 4,376 7,294 7,501 Low 7,000 0
Tennis Court 13 2,693 6,151 5,461 Medium 4,000 0
Pickleball Court 6 5,834 9,124 7,737 Medium 4,000 4
Bocce Ball Court 4 8,751 N/A N/A Low 9,000 0
Volleyball Court 2 17,502 N/A 14,280 Medium 15,000 1
Dog Park 1 35,004 31,087 27,508 Medium 30,000 0
Playgrounds 15 2,334 3,973 3,105 Low 3,500 0
Reservable Picnic
Tables
3 11,668 6,572 N/A Medium/
High
6,000 4
1 Average level of service for comparable Bay Area communities (Belmont, Burlingame, Menlo Park, Millbrae, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco). Source: Parks Master Plan Benchmark Analysis. 2 For agencies serving communities of between 20,000 and 49,999 residents. Source: National Recreation and Park Association, 2024. 3 Priority Investment Rating is an index score based on residents’ level of unmet need and level of importance for each amenity. Source:

Parks Master Plan Community Survey, 2024
Park Use
A park usage analysis was also conducted based on data from Placer.ai and revealed how amenities and user demographics influence visitation patterns, offering insights that can guide future planning, investment, and improvements in Foster City’s parks.1
Catering to Residents and Visitors
Foster City parks primarily cater to residents. However, parks like Baywinds Park and Leo J. Ryan Park attract significant non-resident visitation and have the potential for cost recovery opportunities through user fees, equipment rentals, or other strategies. Other parks with desirable recreation amenities, like Sea Cloud, may also have potential to be leveraged for more cost recovery.

Extending Use
Lighting and shade play a role in shaping park usage patterns, both seasonally and throughout the day.

Enhanced lighting can extend usability into evening hours while being designed to not disturb surrounding residential areas. Adding shade trees and structures could also improve comfort and attract

1 PlacerAI is an analytics platform that leverages anonymous mobile location data to analyze how people move through and interact with different spaces.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

362

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 15
more users during peak sunlight. These upgrades could also promote greater year-round accessibility and enjoyment of parks.

Understanding Park Users
Foster City’s parks should reflect the diversity of the community and the varying ways residents engage with outdoor spaces. Young adults, Hispanic/Latino families, and households with lower to moderate incomes tend to use parks frequently, while seniors, middle-aged adults, and Asian residents, who make up the city’s largest demographic group, appear less represented in park use.2 These patterns point to opportunities to broaden the appeal of Foster City’s parks by ensuring amenities remain affordable and accessible, offering culturally inclusive programs, improving language access, and enhancing park features that meet the needs of all residents.

Park Site Assessment

Foster City Parks are safe, well -maintained and have diverse recreational amenities , though key challenges include Geese habitation and lack of comfort amenities.

Foster City parks were evaluated for access, safety, functionality, and condition. Each park was considered from the perspective of strengths and areas for improvement. Stunning waterfront views at Leo J. Ryan Park and the variety of diverse activities at Sea Cloud Park make those parks attractive destinations for local and regional community members. The park system also faces challenges, including geese droppings particularly at parks with access to the lagoon, and a lack of signage and pathways at parks like Edgewater and Pompano parks. Strengths and challenges are summarized below.

2 It should be noted that visitor demographic data is inferred based on a visitor’s census block group, providing insights into the demographic composition of neighborhoods rather than the specific traits of individual users.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

363

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 16

Opportunity Sites
Foster City is a nearly built-out community with a well-distributed park system and relatively limited undeveloped open space areas. Foster City’s greatest opportunities to expand recreation opportunities lie in enhancing existing parks and facilities. However, two key sites, Sea Cloud II and the Baywinds area, present unique opportunities to introduce new public open spaces that may both provide additional recreational value and also support multiple ecological and resiliency benefits.

Sea Cloud II Site
Adjacent to Sea Cloud Park lies a 21-acre, City-owned open space known as Sea Cloud II, shown in Figure 5. Designated by the Army Corps of Engineers as a dredge material deposit site in 2018, the area has since evolved into a seasonal retention basin and wetland, supporting a mix of natural and invasive vegetation. In recent years, protected bird species have been observed nesting on-site, highlighting the ecological significance of the area and the importance of thoughtful stewardship. Currently fenced off and inaccessible to the public, the site also lacks direct connectivity to Sea Cloud Park and the Bay Trail.

With further study, community visioning, and targeted improvements, it has the potential to become a valuable ecological resource and a recreation asset.

Due to the potential presence of wetland and sensitive habitat areas on portions of the site, the scope of potential improvements is not yet fully known. Additional environmental analysis and close coordination with State and regional regulatory agencies will be necessary to clarify the site’s constraints and opportunities. With that understanding, the City could develop a long-term vision that protects and enhances the site's natural features while improving connectivity to the Bay Trail and potentially introducing recreational amenities.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

364

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 17
Figure 5 Sea Cloud II Site Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation including elevated boardwalk, wildlife viewing areas, and docks.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

365

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 18
Baywinds Park
At just 1.3 acres, Baywinds Park is one of Foster City’s smallest parks, tucked into the northwestern edge of the city along the Bay. The park is popular for windsurfing and attracts people from around the region for that activity. However, the surrounding properties include extensive wetlands, open space, and recreational assets, most notably the 25-acre Mariners Point Golf Center and Driving Range and approximately 25 acres of Caltrans-owned undeveloped land including wetlands. Together, these sites (shown in Figure 6) present a unique opportunity to create a more integrated, nature-focused recreation destination that could support habitat restoration, wildlife viewing, environmental education, picnicking, and other passive uses.

The Mariners Point Golf Center is a valued recreational amenity, currently leased by the City and the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to a private operator. While the long-term vision for the site has not yet been determined, its future use could significantly influence the area’s recreational potential. If the golf course remains indefinitely, improvements could enhance connectivity with Baywinds Park and surrounding open space. If the site is ever repurposed, there may be an opportunity to expand parkland, restore natural habitat, or introduce other recreational facilities.

The Caltrans-owned parcels also represent a strategic opportunity. The City may pursue partnerships or acquisition opportunities that would support site improvements, habitat restoration, and expanded public access.

Figure 6 Baywinds Park Opportunities

Inspirational images of habitat restoration and passive recreation, including a board walk, nature center, and relaxation areas.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

366

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 19
Engagement Results for Parks & Open Space
During the planning process, hundreds of residents shared their insights on the parks and open space system through a variety of engagement opportunities, including workshops, pop-up events, surveys, focus groups, and more. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Parks Master Plan Community Survey
A strong indicator of community preferences came from the Parks Master Plan Community Survey, conducted by ETC Institute in winter 2024–2025 through a mailed and online questionnaire sent to a random sample of Foster City households. With over 300 participants and a 95 percent confidence level, the survey results are considered reflective of the city’s population. The survey found that 85 percent of residents are satisfied or very satisfied with Foster City’s parks and recreation system—well above the national average of 62 percent. To identify resident priorities for recreation amenities and programming, ETC used its Priority Investment Rating (PIR) tool, which equally weighs the importance of a facility and the level of unmet need, as reported by survey respondents. As shown in Figure 7, top priorities identified include multi-use trails, a recreation center, indoor fitness equipment, a swimming pool, beaches, trees and shade, and walking trails in parks.

Figure 7 Foster City Park Amenity Priorities

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

367

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 20
Community Engagement Takeaways
Hundreds of engaged residents have shed light on the aspects of the parks and recreation system that should be improved, added, or prioritized. Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Trails & Connectivity

• Trails are highly valued, and residents greatly appreciate the Levee Pedway. • Residents desire additional trails connecting neighborhoods, parks, and the Levee Pedway.
• Trail improvements are needed, including increased lighting, signage, and safety.

Beaches & Water Quality

• Issues with water quality and beach conditions deter recreational use. • There are opportunities to activate the water through additional amenities, access points, and water-related programming.
• Community members have strong interest in activating the Lagoon’s edges, especially through outdoor dining.

New Park Experiences

• Foster City has a great park system, with fantastic active recreation facilities. • Residents would welcome new features to further activate and increase identity through new and unique experiences.
• There is demand for more passive spaces, such as walking paths, picnic areas, beaches, and natural open spaces.

Park Comfort

• Park users would benefit from more comfortable places to relax and walk through improved shade, pathways, and seating.
• Some highly visited parks need improved or expanded restrooms.

Indoor Recreation & Swimming

• Residents share a desire for fitness, senior, arts, and cultural programs, reinforcing the need for the new Community Center.
• Indoor fitness equipment and a swimming pool are community needs that are so far unmet with current plans.
• School joint-use agreements are essential for the community’s access to gymnasiums.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

368

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 21
Programming and Events
Programming and events are key elements of park facilities and open spaces in Foster City. Participation is reinforced by the settings themselves: waterfront views at Leo Ryan, shaded lawns at Boothbay, and playgrounds near picnic areas all create inviting environments for both organized programs and casual community use. The City offers a variety of programs and services that fall into the following core program areas:
• Afterschool Programs: Provide programming on elementary school campuses on early dismissal days.
• Athletics: Foster healthy lifestyles and promoting lifelong wellness throughout the community. • Camps: Full-day camps for children ages 4 to 13.
• Community Events: Engage Foster City residents and visitors with free to low-cost events. • Lifelong Learning and Wellness: Various classes offered year-round that provide opportunities for community engagement.
• Reservations and Rentals: Rentable rooms and park spaces that accommodate different types of events, meetings and parties.

Serving All Ages
The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department provides a balance of programs and services across all age segments. The Department should continue to provide programs across all age groups and reevaluate program offerings each year with the goal of keeping programs responsive to user needs.

Table 4 provides a summary of the various recreational programs offered to different age groups within Foster City.

Table 4 Ages Served by Recreational Core Program Area
Ages Served
Core Program Area
Preschool
(5 and under)
Elementary
(6-12)
Teens
(13-17)
Young
Adult
(18-34)
Adult
(35-54)
Active Adult
(55-64)
Senior
(65+)
Afterschool
Enrichment Program
X
Athletics X X X X X X X
Community Events X X X X X X X
Facility & Park Rentals X X X X
Youth & Adult Contract
Classes & Specialty
Camps

X X X X X X
Teen Afterschool
Program
X
Youth & Teen Camps X X X
Source: Foster City Parks Master Plan Program and Services Assessment, PROS Consulting, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

369

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 22
Engagement Results on Programming
The Parks Master Plan Community Survey sheds light on community interests and needs for programming and events:
• 46 percent of residents have participated in Foster City programs in the past 12 months, significantly more than the national average of 36 percent. By weighing the importance of a program and the level of unmet need, fitness/wellness programs, community special events, outdoor recreation, programs for seniors, cultural enrichment programs, visual arts/crafts programs, performing arts programs, and pickleball lessons and leagues emerged as top priorities for residents (see Figure 8). • The biggest barrier to program participation was a lack of awareness, with 27 percent of residents indicating they did not know what was being offered. Other top barriers included inconvenient program times (23 percent) and being too busy or not interested in participating (15 percent).

Figure 8 Program and Event Priorities from the Statistically Valid Community Survey

Source: ETC Institute, 2025.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

370

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 23
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance is needed for many parks, facilities, and amenities to promote functionality, safety, and aesthetic appeal for Foster City residents.

Engagement Results on Maintenance
The community engagement process surfaced several key insights related to park operations and maintenance. Feedback from the survey and open-ended comments highlighted both areas of satisfaction and specific concerns that can help guide future improvements. • Physical Condition Generally Rated Well, But Gaps Remain.

While 90 percent of residents rated park conditions as “excellent” or “good,” 9 percent rated them as only “fair” or “poor,” signaling pockets of maintenance issues that may be addressed through targeted interventions.
• Restroom and Trail Maintenance Need Greater Emphasis.

An Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) analysis identified paved path/trails, restrooms, and waterways/beaches as the top two priorities for maintenance. These areas had high importance but relatively lower satisfaction scores, indicating strong community demand for better upkeep. • Cleanliness and Environmental Conditions Are Concerns.

Although not always formally listed, geese droppings were repeatedly mentioned in open-ended comments as a major deterrent to park use, suggesting the need for more proactive sanitation and environmental management as part of routine maintenance.

Maintenance Assessment
A Park Maintenance and Operations Assessment was conducted as part of the Foster City Parks Master Plan, analyzing current maintenance practices, staffing levels, service standards, and operational challenges across the city’s park system. The assessment evaluated how the City maintains its parks and open spaces and reviewed key functions such as turf management, irrigation, equipment upkeep, and trail maintenance.

Key challenges that came out of this assessment included:
• Lack of a Formal Maintenance Management Plan
While some standards exist, the City does not have a fully documented plan tracking work performance and outcomes by park.
• No GIS-Based Asset Management System
The absence of such a system limits the City’s ability to track maintenance needs, costs, and asset lifecycles efficiently.
• Underfunding of Maintenance Operations
Annual park maintenance funding falls short compared to the level needed for optimal service. • Well-Equipped but Needs Continued Investment
The City currently has the necessary vehicles and equipment but must reinvest as the system grows to maintain service levels.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

371

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 24
Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Foster City’s open space network presents several meaningful opportunities for enhancing natural habitat and wildlife compatibility, including targeted rewilding that can enhance ecological integrity and restore natural processes across the urban landscape. Guided by the provisions of SB 1425, the City can pursue strategies that preserve, enhance, and expand habitat areas within and adjacent to developed zones. The City’s open spaces are identified in Figure 9, below.

Belmont Slough, which forms a natural boundary between Foster City and Redwood Shores, is a prime opportunity area for rewilding. The surrounding wetlands provide vital habitat for shorebirds and native plant communities such as cordgrass and pickleweed. With portions of the shoreline under the management of the CDFW and others privately owned, there are opportunities for both targeted and coordinated restoration efforts such as marshland expansion, the creation of buffer zones using native vegetation, and formal habitat restoration plans that involve multiple local and regional agencies and funding sources.

Seal Slough, also known as Marina Lagoon, represents another opportunity to support habitat connectivity and ecological health. While much of the slough is managed by the City of San Mateo, Foster City shares responsibility for adjacent areas and could support and collaborate on restoration efforts. Strategies may include riparian plantings, removal of invasive species, and the establishment of small-scale wildlife corridors.

Beyond these tidal and riparian corridors, Foster City’s urban parks and landscaped areas offer potential for small-scale rewilding. Parks such as Boothbay and Port Royal could be enhanced by replacing portions of ornamental lawns with native, drought-tolerant plants, introducing wildflower meadows, or establishing gardens focused on native species. Even highly engineered shoreline areas could benefit from nature-based enhancements, such as vegetated buffer strips and boardwalks that improve both habitat quality and public engagement with natural spaces. For additional information and policies on habitat and wildlife management and connectivity, please see the Conservation Element.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

372

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 25
Figure 9 Publicly Accessible Open Space

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

373

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 26
Climate Resiliency
Foster City’s open spaces also play a critical role in advancing the City’s climate resiliency goals by serving as buffers against climate-related hazards and offering natural systems that help moderate environmental stressors. Coastal wetlands and shoreline open spaces, such as those near Belmont Slough and the Bay Trail, absorb floodwaters, reduce wave energy, and space for marsh migration and living-shoreline measures needed to accommodate sea level rise over time.

Mapping of sea level rise scenarios illustrates that while Foster City’s upgraded levee provides critical protection against current coastal hazards, the community remains vulnerable to future conditions driven by climate change. Figure 10 shows a mid-century scenario of approximately 0.8 feet of SLR (about the increase expected during typical daily high tides by 2050, absent any storms). Under this scenario, portions of the shoreline, including parks, trails, and some low-lying residential areas (such as those along Beach Park Boulevard and the fringes of the central lagoon) could experience more frequent tidal flooding. Vulnerability increases further when considering the added impact of severe coastal storms or King Tide events on top of elevated sea levels. Figure 11 illustrates Foster City’s present-day 100-year storm surge scenario, which in combination with sea level rise could exceed the capacity of existing flood protection. Such an event could affect residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, critical infrastructure, and transportation routes, including portions of Highway 101.

Preserving, enhancing, and restoring these areas with native vegetation and habitat restoration strengthens their ability to sequester and store carbon, filter pollutants, and reduce the impacts of storm surges on adjacent neighborhoods and critical infrastructure. Open spaces also bolster ecological resilience by preserving habitat for habitat corridors that allow species to migrate and adapt to rising temperatures and shifting ecosystems, countering regional habitat fragmentation in line with AB 1889.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

374

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 27
Figure 10 Sea Level Rise Inundation (0.8 feet)

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

375

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 28
Figure 11 Present-Day (No Sea Level Rise) 100-Year Storm Inundation Risk

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

376

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 29
Another emerging concern is groundwater rise. As sea level rises, the water table in Foster City will rise as well, since the city is built on permeable fill and former marsh and the water table will rise as sea level rises. Rising groundwater can lead to flooding from below, even if surface levees hold back the Bay from direct coastal inundation. Figure 12 displays a groundwater rise hazard map for Foster City, highlighting areas particularly susceptible to groundwater rise, particularly the shoreline zones and lands around the lagoon. In these areas, the water table will likely eventually breach the surface or infiltrate underground infrastructure, causing flooding of housing foundations, road base materials, or within storm sewers. Groundwater rise could also induce soil instability or mobilize pollutants in soils.

To strengthen climate resilience and meet SB 1425 goals, Foster City should implement nature-based strategies, such as permeable surfaces, expanded tree canopy, and green stormwater infrastructure, to reduce heat, retain stormwater, and recharge shallow groundwater. For example, native plantings in shoreline parks and undeveloped parcels can strengthen soil stability, support pollinator populations, and reduce the need for irrigation. Meadow restoration and the creation of microhabitats within urban green spaces offer additional benefits by moderating temperatures and supporting localized ecosystems. As climate pressures intensify, integrating open space into the City’s adaptation strategy is vital for ecological function and for protecting the public health and safety of residents. These spaces offer cooler environments during heat waves, areas for passive stormwater retention, and opportunities for environmental education that can foster long-term stewardship and community resilience.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

377

Background

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 30
Figure 12 Present Day (No Sea Level Rise) Groundwater Hazard

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

378

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 31
Goals and Policies
Parks and Recreation System
Goal POS-1 Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

Policy POS 1.1 Vibrant and Unique Parks. Aim for all Foster City parks to be vibrant and have a unique identity, incorporating in-demand and innovative features for evening activation.

Policy POS 1.2 Comfortable Parks. Support park comfort and appeal by adding or improving key features such as seating, lighting, shade, and restrooms.

Policy POS 1.3 Community Needs. Strive to make the parks and recreation system responsive to the recreation needs identified in the Parks Master Plan and through continued engagement.

Goal POS-2 Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 2.1 Connected Trail System. Create a citywide network of paths and trails for walking and biking that is safe and comfortable.

Policy POS 2.2 Navigating Parks. Promote easy access to and navigation within the City’s parks, lagoon, and trails by installing wayfinding signage and creating plans for multi-modal access.

Policy POS 2.3 Accessible & Inclusive. Promote accessibility and inclusivity in park facilities and programs through universal design and diverse, community-responsive activities.

Goal POS-3 The Foster City Lagoon is active and well-integrated with its surroundings.

Policy POS 3.1 Lagoon Access & Amenities. Provide places and amenities to view, enjoy and access the Lagoon.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

379

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 32
Policy POS 3.2 Waterfront Activation. Increase Lagoon activation through programming and events, improved water quality, and increased water-front activity.

Programming and Events
Goal POS-4 Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs.

Policy POS 4.1 Programming. Invest in high priority programs and services that bring residents together, serve all age groups, and are responsive to community needs and desires.

Policy POS 4.2 Community Events. Strengthen community events in Foster City by improving and expanding offerings and collaborating with other recreation providers.

Operations and Maintenance
Goal POS-5 Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

Policy POS 5.1 High Quality Maintenance. Continue to support high-quality park and facility maintenance by focusing on key maintenance priorities and investing in maintenance staff, tools, and equipment.

Policy POS 5.2 Funding Strategy. Develop and implement a funding strategy to realize the City’s vision for its parks and recreation system.

Policy POS 5.3 Plan and Engage Proactively. Promote long-term success through regular planning, transparent reporting, and ongoing community engagement.

Open Space Value for Natural Resources
Goal POS-6 Foster City’s parks and open spaces support native biodiversity, climate resilience, and ecological function through targeted rewilding, habitat restoration, and nature-based solutions.

Policy POS 6.1 Urban Rewilding. Implement urban rewilding projects to reintroduce natural processes, restore natural ecosystems, and promote biodiversity.

Policy POS 6.2 Habitat Linkages. Prioritize rewilding in areas that enhance or create new habitat linkages and corridors for wildlife movement.) Policy POS 6.3 Resilient Landscaping. Prioritize the use of native, drought-tolerant, and climate-resilient vegetation in existing parks and landscaped open

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

380

Goals and Policies

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 33
spaces to enhance habitat value, reduce water demand, and support pollinators.

Policy POS 6.4 Ecologically Beneficial Features. Integrate ecologically beneficial features, such as pollinator gardens, wildflower meadows, bioswales, and native plant corridors, into public parks, medians, and along trail networks.

Policy POS 6.5 Community Participation. Encourage inclusive community participation in habitat restoration through stewardship programs, youth engagement, and interpretive signage in rewilded open spaces.

Climate Resiliency
Goal POS-7 Foster City’s open space network is adaptively managed to strengthen resilience to climate change impacts, including sea level rise, extreme heat, and flood risk.

Policy POS 7.1 Multi-benefit Prioritization. Prioritize the preservation and restoration of undeveloped open spaces and natural areas that provide multi-benefit climate services, including flood protection, carbon sequestration, heat reduction, and habitat connectivity, particularly in underserved areas.

Policy POS 7.2 Climate Data Integration. Integrate future climate scenarios, such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat, into open space design, planning, and management decisions to support ecological resilience, adaptive capacity, and equitable public access.

Policy POS 7.3 Green Streets. Encourage the use of “green streets” that incorporate native vegetation, permeable surfaces, and stormwater features to enhance habitat and reduce runoff.

Policy POS 7.4 Green Infrastructure. Support the development of rooftop gardens, vertical greenery, and other integrated green infrastructure that enhances biodiversity and reduces energy use.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

381

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 34
Implementation Programs
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-a Enhance park activation and identity by reprogramming underutilized park spaces with in-demand or innovative park amenities/experiences, referencing the park-specific improvements identified in the Parks Master Plan.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-b As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, support the expansion of passive amenities such as walking trails, picnic areas, and natural open spaces.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.1
POS-c As part of future park improvement and maintenance projects, seek opportunities to increase shade in parks by planting trees and/or constructing shade structures, particularly at playgrounds and picnic areas.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Ongoing POS-1.2
POS-d Add or improve seating, lighting, water fountains/refill stations, trash receptacles, restrooms, and bike racks to all parks where needed.

Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-1.2
POS-e Explore opportunities to expand access to indoor recreation and swimming facilities by pursuing or strengthening partnerships with San Mateo-Foster City School District and private recreation providers.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-1.3
POS-f As Foster City grows, the City will continue to maintain the existing developed parkland of 113.6 acres in Foster City.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-1.3
POS-g Determine an appropriate LOS that balances future housing and community preference and make necessary edits to Chapter 16.36 Parks and Recreation Facilities of Foster City Municipal Code.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Mid-term POS-1.3
POS-h Conduct a study of open space opportunity areas to assess their environmental constraints and natural assets. Use these insights to create a master plan that balances ecological restoration with expanded recreational access and amenities.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Short-term POS-1.3
POS-i Explore opportunities for creating a network of paths and trails that connect existing city parks, trails, and community destinations. Work cross- departmentally to implement the Bike Pedestrian Master Plan 2026.

Public Works Community
Development/Parks
and Recreation
Long-term POS-2.1
POS-j Consider additional improvements to the Levee Pedway, including distance markers, signage, and lighting, to create comfortable conditions for all trail users.

Public Works

Parks and
Recreation/Commu
nity Development
Long-term POS-2.1

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

382

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 35
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-k Explore strategies for establishing clear and consistent signage across the park and recreation system.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-2.2
POS-l Enhance ADA-compliant access at all parks. Parks and Recreation Public Works Long-term POS-2.3 POS-m Promote cross-cultural and multi-generational programming and facilities, recognizing the full diversity of Foster City residents.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-2.3
POS-n Explore opportunities to enhance the integration of the design of lagoon- adjacent parks with the lagoon, providing places to view, enjoy, and access the water, including boat docking opportunities.

Parks and Recreation Long-term POS-3.1
POS-o Collaborate across departments to continue to implement the Lagoon Water Quality Management Plan and Canada Goose Population Management Plan to improve cleanliness of lagoon-adjacent parks and lagoon water quality.

Public Works Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-p Support land use regulatory changes to encourage public access and activation along the lagoon as part of future development.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation
Mid-term POS-3.2
POS-q Continue to support the use of the lagoon for community events such as regattas, performances, etc.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-3.2
POS-r Explore opportunities to activate recreational use of the lagoon. Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-3.2 POS-s Pursue opportunities to expand high-demand recreational programs/events that serve residents of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-4.1
POS-t Continue to support and expand special events that activate community parks in all seasons.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-u Complement and connect with other recreation providers and event sponsors, developing partnerships when advantageous.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-4.2
POS-v Encourage the dedication of staff resources to help identify and secure funding that supports park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programming and events.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-5.3
POS-w Continue to foster the provision of high-quality parks and recreation services through the strategic allocation of funds for recreation programming, park/facility maintenance, and lifecycle improvements to maintain consistent financial support for meeting accepted service levels.

Parks and Recreation Ongoing POS-5.3
POS-x Promote the use of consistent community engagement practices, such as surveys, town halls, and focus groups, to continue to gather input on evolving recreational needs and preferences.

Parks and Recreation Communications Ongoing POS-5.4

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

383

Implementation Programs

Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space Element 36
Number Program Lead Department
Supporting
Department(s) Timeframe1
Implements
Policy(ies)
POS-y Support the identification of at least one City park or trail-adjacent open space for pilot naturalization projects that include, but are not limited to, replacement of turf or ornamental plantings with native vegetation.

Monitor for habitat use, water savings, and community reception.

Parks and Recreation Mid-term POS-6.1, POS-

6.3 POS-z Explore opportunities to map and identify areas within the City’s parks and open spaces to naturalize with the aim of connecting natural areas with rewilded areas. Prioritize rewilding efforts in places where the clearest linkages for species movement between areas.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development
Long-term POS-6.2
POS-aa Seek opportunities to host seasonal events in collaboration with local schools, nonprofits, or native plant societies to involve residents in habitat restoration activities and promote awareness of urban ecology.

Parks and Recreation Communications Bi-Annual POS-6.4
POS-bb Actively seek State and federal funding opportunities that support land conservation, shoreline resilience, or wetland restoration, and coordinate with regional agencies for joint applications.

Parks and Recreation Community
Development/City
Manager’s Office
Ongoing POS-7.1, POS-

7.2 POS-cc Pursue the development of a climate-resilient open space web viewer that overlays sea level rise projections, habitat corridors, and flood-prone areas and use as a tool for determining the highest impact naturalization and resilience-focused projects to prioritize.

Community
Development
City Manager’s
Office
Long-term POS-7.2
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

384

EXHIBIT B
Parks and Open Space Element Legislative Consistency Checklist

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

385

EXHIBIT B
Parks and Open Space Element Legislative Consistency Checklist Government Code
Section
Description of
Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code § 65563 The Open Space Element
must provide a long-range
and comprehensive plan
for the preservation and
conservation of open
space lands.

Addressed The Element provides a
comprehensive, long-range framework
for parks and open space, establishing
goals, policies, and implementation
programs that ensure ongoing
stewardship, programming, and climate
resilience.

Gov. Code §65560(h)(1) The Open Space Element
must designate and
conserve open space for
the preservation of natural
resources such as habitat,
scientific study areas,
rivers and streams, and
watersheds.

Addressed Goals POS-6 and POS-7 commit to
habitat restoration, urban rewilding,
protection of watershed lands, and
integrating scientific/ecological study
opportunities. Implementation programs
(POS-x, POS-y, POS-aa) specifically
advance rewilding, habitat corridors,
and shoreline resilience.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(2)
The Open Space Element
must identify and
conserve open space
lands used for the
managed production of
resources, including
forests, rangelands,
agriculture, groundwater
recharge areas, fisheries,
and minerals.

Partially
Applicable
Foster City does not contain any
managed production resources.

However, the Element addresses
groundwater recharge (POS-7.3, POS-

7.4).

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(3)
The Open Space Element
must provide for open
space dedicated to
outdoor recreation,
including parks, scenic
areas, cultural and historic
sites, trails, and
recreational corridors.

Addressed Recreational access is a central focus
of the Element. Goals POS-1 through
POS-4 and Programs POS-a–POS-s
ensure high-quality parks, recreation
amenities, trail connectivity, cultural and
community events, and scenic shoreline
access.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(4)
The Open Space Element
must conserve open
space lands needed for
public health and safety,
such as hazard areas,
floodplains, fire-risk areas,
and lands critical to
maintaining water and air
quality.

Addressed The Element addresses sea level rise,
flood hazards, and groundwater rise in
open spaces (POS-7.1–7.4, POS-bb).

The Element describes and includes
policy for the use of open space as a
buffer for climate hazards, improving air
quality, floodwater management, and
reducing heat island effects.

Gov. Code §65560(h)
(5)
The Open Space Element
must account for and
protect open space in
support of the operational
integrity of military
installations.

Not Applicable No military installations or training areas are located in or adjacent to Foster City.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

386

Government Code
Section
Description of
Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code §65560(h)
(6)
The Open Space Element
must include provisions
for conserving open space
that protects tribal cultural
resources, traditional
lands, and places of
significance.

Addressed Foster City does not contain any open
space for the protection of tribal
resources. The Element acknowledges
tribal cultural resources in alignment
with Public Resources Code §5097.9
and §5097.993. Consultation was
conducted consistent with State law.

Gov. Code §65560(h)

Save El Toro Assn. v.

Days (1977)
74 Cal. App. 3d 64, 73
The Open Space Element
must include an inventory
of open space lands
important for the
preservation of natural
resources.

Addressed Background section includes a detailed
inventory of open spaces, including
Belmont Slough, Seal Slough, San
Francisco Bay shoreline, and the
Lagoon, with ecological value
highlighted.

Gov. Code §65562(a) The Open Space Element
must establish policies
that require open space
lands to be conserved
wherever possible.

Addressed Goal POS-6 and related policies
prioritize conservation and rewilding of
open space areas to maintain
ecological value and community
benefits.

Gov. Code §65562(b) The Open Space Element
must be coordinated with
State, regional, and local
open space conservation
plans to ensure
consistency and
effectiveness.

Addressed The Element emphasizes coordination
with OneShoreline, BCDC, ABAG, and
CDFW for shoreline resilience,
ecological restoration, and open space
planning.

Gov. Code §§65564,
65566, 65567, 65910
The Open Space Element
must include an action
program for
implementation, including
acquisition and disposal of
lands, zoning consistency,
subdivision and building
permit review, and
application of open-space
zoning.

Addressed Implementation Programs POS-g, POS-
aa, and POS-bb support acquisition
studies, funding strategies, and zoning
consistency. The Element affirms that
open space land use regulations must
align with the plan.

Gov. Code §65565.5

SB 1425 (2022)
Requires that Open Space
Element updates prioritize
multi-benefit uses of open
space, particularly in
underserved communities.

Plans must include an
action program to improve
equitable access, address
climate resilience (e.g.,
flood mitigation, cooling),
and incorporate rewilding
opportunities.

Addressed The Parks and Open Space Element
incorporates SB 1425 requirements
throughout. Goals POS-6 and POS-7
emphasize rewilding, habitat
restoration, climate resilience, and
multi-benefit open space management.

Policies POS-7.1 and POS-7.2 highlight
equitable access and climate
adaptation. Programs POS-x, POS-y,
POS-aa, and POS-bb commit to
naturalization pilots, mapping habitat
linkages, pursuing funding, and
developing a climate-resilient open
space web viewer.

7.1 Attachment 7 - Planning Commission Resolution P-12-25

387

RESOLUTION NO. P - 13 - 25

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REPEAL THE 2003 CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING THE 2025

CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND FINDING THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE ELEMENT

IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTA L QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, a general plan contains the community vision for future growth, California law also requires each general plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302; and
WHEREAS, the mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety; and WHEREAS, Foster City’s Conservation Element w as last adopted in May 20 03 and reprinted as a separate element in September 2009; and WHEREAS, the State Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, LCI (previously known as the Office of Planning and Research or OPR) recommends comprehens ively updating a General Plan every 10- 15 years to reflect changes in community values, economic conditions, and emerging issues and challenges; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 1425 requires that the Open Space Element be updated by January 1, 2026, with expanded requirements including consideration of climate resilience in coordination with the Safety Element; and WHEREAS, SB 1425 also explicitly focuses on "rewilding opportunities," or creating and preserving open space networks to support biological and recreational uses; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 1889 requires the General Plan Conservation Element to consider the effect of development within the jurisdiction on the movement of wildlife and habitat connectivity; and
WHEREAS, AB 1889 requires the Conservation Element, upon the next update of one or more elements on or after January 1, 2028, to, among other things, identify and analyze connectivity areas, permeability, and natural landscape areas within the jurisdiction, identify and analyze existing or planned wildlife passage features, and consider the impacts of development and the barriers caused by development to wildlife, as defined, and habitat connectivity; and

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

388

WHEREAS, to ensure compliance with SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements in a timely manner, the City of Foster City began work on updating the two (2) Elements, including the Parks and Open Space Element, and Conservation Element; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.4 require that before a legislative body takes action to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency shall refer the proposed action to a number of entities or conduct consultations with California Native American tribes that are on the contact list. The City has referred the Parks and Open Space Element to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission; and WHEREAS, no California Native American Tribe has requested consultation; and WHEREAS, the City conducted extensive community outreach, including one (1) joint workshop, two (2) focus groups, two (2) pop- up events, a dedicated webpage, and one (1) community priorities survey and social media, e-news, emails, and notices; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2025, the City published an administrative draft of the Conservation Element and requested public comment on the draft until September 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65353, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65354, the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2025, a public hearing notice was published in the newspaper (Foster City Islander) and posted in three public places pursuant to California Government Code Section 65090 for the Planning Commission public hearing on October 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider this Resolution regarding the 2025 Conservation Element, reviewed the Element and all pertinent documents and exhibits, staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission hereby finds that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.

2. The proposed project conforms to the provisions and standards of the General Plan in that the proposed amendments are internally consistent with all other

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

389

provisions of the General Plan and do not conflict with any of the previously adopted goals, policies, or programs of the General Plan.

3. The proposed General Plan Amendment complies with, and is required by, applicable State law.

4. The proposed amendments will not be detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City. The amendments will ensure Foster City’s General Plan is consistent with current state law (including AB 1889 requirements on wildlife movement and habitat connectivity). The updated Element establishes the City’s vision, goals, policies, and implementation programs for conserving and managing natural resources such as biological habitats, air and water quality, energy, cultural and historic resources, and the urban forest. It also integrates climate resilience by addressing issues such as sea level rise, groundwater rise, and extreme heat.

5. The City, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has completed analysis, and the 2025 Parks and Open Space Element and 2025 Conservation Element and determined that the Updates are exempt from the California Environmental Q uality Act (CEQA) based on the “common sense exemption” in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which applies if it can be seen with certainty that a project will not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. The Updates involve the adoption of policy documents to establish the City’s vision, goals, policies, and programs for the provisioning and management of natural and recreational areas within the city, as well as the protection of natural and cultural resources. These policy documents, in and of themselves, do not include any proposed projects or development. The Updates do not propose or approve any physical development and will not result in changes to the physical environment, nor will they result in potential environmental impacts.

To the extent that the Updates do identify potential future projects or development, those would be analyzed if and when the City approves those projects in accordance with CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Foster City therefore recommends that the City Council repeal the 2003 Conservation Element and adopt the 2025 Conservation Element as set forth in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference and attached hereto.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

390

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 2nd day of October 2025, by the following vote:

AYES,
COMMISSIONERS:

NOES, COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAIN, COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS:
___
_______________________

ROBERT PEDRO, CHAIR
A
TTEST:
___
________________________

SOFIA MANGALAM, SECRETARY
Haddad, Jagtiani, Kenkre, and Chair Pedro
Stoveland
Robert Pedro (Oct 3, 2025 16:23:45 PDT)
Robert Pedro

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

391

EXHIBIT A
Conservation Element – Final Clean Version

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

392

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 1
Conservation Introduction

Foster City, 2025.

Purpose
The Conservation Element fulfills the State’s requirements for a Conservation Element and articulates Foster City’s long-term vision for conserving and managing its natural and cultural resources. Within this, it emphasizes environmental sustainability, community well-being, and climate resilience as central to the City’s management of natural resources.

This Element outlines the city’s environmental setting, highlights unique local resources, and establishes goals, policies, and implementation actions to support their protection, restoration, and sustainable use.

It guides stewardship of wildlife movement and connectivity and wildlife habitat, the urban forest, surface and groundwater, and historic, cultural, and tribal resources. It also supports efforts to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with state mandates.

This Element is organized into four primary sections: Requirements, Background, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Programs. The Requirements section outlines legal requirements for the content of this element. The Background section provides existing conditions and key conservation considerations for Foster City. The Goals and Policies section defines the City’s goals and policy direction for the conservation of natural resources. The Implementation Programs section outlines specific actions the City will take to achieve the vision set by the Goals and Policies.

Clarification of Terminology
The Conservation Element and the Parks and Open Space Element both address land and resource stewardship in Foster City, but each with a distinct purpose and emphasis:

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

393

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 2

While these categories differ in focus, they are deeply interconnected. Open space and parks often serve as the physical setting where conservation strategies are implemented. For example, a park may include restored habitat, and an open space corridor may function as both a scenic buffer and a wildlife pathway. Conservation provides the guiding framework that weaves these uses together, ensuring Foster City’s green spaces support not only recreation and beauty, but long-term ecological health and resilience.

Figure 1 identifies the parks and open spaces within Foster City. Figure 2 identifies protection responsibilities for each type of park, open space, and conservation area.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

394

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 3
Figure 1 Parks and Open Spaces

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

395

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 4
Figure 2 Protected Areas

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

396

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 5
Legal Requirements
The Conservation Element of the General Plan is guided by State law, regional plans, and local priorities that collectively aim to preserve natural resources, support ecological health, and support the sustainable management of environmental systems. Key statutes and policies include the following:

California Government Code §65302(d) – Conservation Element Requirement
The primary legal foundation for the Conservation Element is Government Code §65302(d), which requires all general plans to include policies addressing the conservation, development, and use of natural resources. These include watersheds, forests, soils, rivers and other waters, harbors, fisheries, wildlife, minerals, and other natural systems. The statute emphasizes that policies must reflect local conditions, support long-term resource management, and be coordinated with efforts to protect air and water quality.

California Air Resources Board (CARB) and BAAQMD Guidance Statewide air quality policy is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which sets emission standards, regulates fuels and vehicles, and oversees programs aimed to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. At the regional level, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) prepares the Clean Air Plan to reduce pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, with an emphasis on cumulative pollution burdens in disproportionately impacted communities. The Conservation Element supports these goals by promoting land use patterns and infrastructure that reduce vehicle emissions, increase urban greening, and limit exposure to harmful pollutants, particularly near homes, schools, and other sensitive land uses.

Senate Bill 1425 (2022) – Open-Space Element: Updates
Senate Bill (SB) 1425 added Government Code §65565.5 to require that the Open Space Element prioritize the multi-benefit use of green spaces, particularly in historically underserved communities.

The law directs jurisdictions to include plans and an action program in any update to address access to open space for all residents in a manner that considers social, economic, and racial equity, correlated with the environmental justice policies in the general plan, address climate resilience strategies such as flood mitigation and cooling, and to address rewilding opportunities. While most of the requirements of SB 1425 are met within the Parks and Open Space Element, many of the topics in this Element are closely related to the those covered within the Conservation Element.

Assembly Bill 1889 (2024) – Conservation Element: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity
AB 1889 amended Government Code §65302(d), requiring jurisdictions to identify and analyze wildlife connectivity and movement corridors, and consider the impact of development on species movement and ecological resilience. Any impacts and barriers to wildlife movement are then required to be avoided, minimized, or mitigated to the extent feasible. It encourages alignment with State and regional agencies, conservation goals, and efforts in developing wildlife and habitat connectivity strategies.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

397

Conservation Introduction

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 6
Regional and Local Planning
In addition to meeting State requirements, the Conservation Element must align with several key regional and local planning efforts that support natural resource protection, habitat restoration, and climate resilience.
 The Climate Action Plan (CAP) establishes strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance climate resilience through energy efficiency, renewable energy, clean transportation, and sustainable land use.
 The Lagoon Management Plan outlines policies for maintaining water quality, controlling aquatic vegetation, and managing wildlife populations within the City’s lagoon system. It also provides a framework for public education and monitoring.
 The Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan provides strategies for managing Canada goose populations in Foster City’s parks and lagoon system to minimize impacts on water quality, vegetation, and recreation.
 The Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan outline Foster City’s water supply reliability, drought management strategies, and contingency measures for shortages.
 The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Basin Plans (Basin Plans) establish water quality objectives, identify beneficial uses of water bodies (such as habitat or recreation), and include strategies to control pollution and manage watershed health. These Basin Plans are legally enforceable by the RWQCB and guide stormwater discharge permitting and waterway protection at the local level.
 The San Mateo County Sustainable Streets and Green Infrastructure Plan provides a framework for integrating green infrastructure, such as rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable pavements, into street design and public projects. It helps cities meet stormwater permit requirements while improving water quality, habitat, and streetscape aesthetics.  The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program provides a coordinated framework for cities to reduce stormwater pollution through infrastructure upgrades, public education, and monitoring.
 OneShoreline, the San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District, coordinates regional adaptation efforts related to sea level rise, tidal flooding, and shoreline ecosystem restoration. Its work supports integrated infrastructure projects that reduce flood risk while enhancing natural habitat.
 In compliance with SB 18 (Gov. Code § 65352.3), the City contacted all California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area. No responses requesting consultation were received.

This regional and local framework ensures that the Conservation Element is grounded in practical, science-based strategies that address both ecological function and community well-being.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

398

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 7
Background
The process for updating the Conservation Element included a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions; evaluating the city’s natural resources, habitat areas, water and air quality, and energy infrastructure; and identifying opportunities to enhance ecological health and climate resilience. In addition, the analysis evaluated future considerations on sea level rise, groundwater rise, extreme heat, and air quality, and highlighted opportunities to enhance biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and equitable access to green space. As shown in Figure 3, community outreach was conducted in coordination with the Parks Master Plan (discussed further in the Parks and Open Space Element), ensuring that the voices of residents and stakeholders guided the direction of this Element. Together, the assessment and engagement serve as the foundation for the goals and policies of the Conservation Element.

Figure 3 Community Engagement Overview

The public engagement process for the Conservation Element update was designed to gather input on key issues such as species preservation, habitat conservation, and water quality, while ensuring alignment with the ongoing Parks Master Plan update. A key tool in this effort was a dedicated project website that provided ongoing updates and hosted the Community Priorities Survey, which built on the Parks Master Plan survey by focusing on natural resources and conservation topics. This survey gathered valuable feedback from a diverse range of residents, with particular emphasis on underrepresented communities, helping shape policies related to biodiversity, open space access, and environmental equity. Pop-up events were also used to engage the community directly, allowing them to provide input on conservation priorities while also participating in the broader parks-related discussions.

Biological Resources
Despite its highly urbanized setting and origins as reclaimed marshland, Foster City continues to support a mosaic of natural habitats. Key ecological areas include tidal wetlands, mudflats, and the centrally located lagoon system, which together provide important habitat for migratory birds, small mammals, and aquatic species. The San Francisco Bay also borders the city to the north and east and is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. As shown in Figure 4, vegetation mapping has identified several habitat types within the city, including salt marsh, non-native forest, and native herbaceous communities. Notably, 21 special-status animal species and six plant species have been observed or are presumed present,

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

399

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 8
including the endangered Ridgeway’s rail and salt-marsh harvest mouse, both dependent on the city’s remaining tidal marshes.

Foster City’s biological resources face ongoing challenges from habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and urban runoff. Shoreline habitats are often constrained by levees and adjacent development, limiting their ecological function and the ability of species to migrate or adapt to environmental change. These pressures are compounded by climate-related stressors such as rising sea levels and shifting precipitation patterns.

Within this complex landscape, areas along Belmont Slough, Seal Slough, and underutilized park edges offer potential for habitat restoration and rewilding. These efforts could strengthen native biodiversity, improve habitat connectivity, and help restore key ecosystem services. In addition, Foster City’s extensive park system presents a valuable resource for targeted naturalization and improved linkages between natural areas to support wildlife movement and expand urban habitat in meaningful ways.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

400

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 9
Figure 4 Vegetation and Land Cover

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

401

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 10
Wildlife Connectivity
Wildlife movement in Foster City is shaped, and often limited, by urban infrastructure such as roads, levees, and dense development. Natural movement corridors are limited, typically confined to narrow greenways, fragmented shoreline edges, and the lagoon system. While the lagoon offers aesthetic and recreational value to residents and visitors as well as some habitat potential, its channelized design, steep edges, and proximity to human activity reduces its habitat value for many species.

Recognizing the importance of habitat connectivity, State law (AB 1889) now requires cities and counties to assess and enhance habitat connectivity for wildlife through their general plans. In Foster City, barriers to wildlife movement include:
 Highway 92, which disrupts north–south continuity
 Urban lighting, which interferes with the behavior of nocturnal species  Recreational activity, which can fragment habitats and deter sensitive wildlife As shown in Figure 5, much of Foster City is either urban or suburban, and therefore wildlife corridors and nursery sites are not present in much of the city. Wildlife connectivity areas are fragmented, and green spaces are often landscaped for recreation rather than habitat value, reducing their ecological function. However, with strategic design and targeted improvements, these spaces can support both human and ecological needs. Enhancing shoreline habitats, planting suitable vegetation, and implementing wildlife-friendly infrastructure such as culverts or buffer zones can create pathways for wildlife movement and better contribute to a resilient and biodiverse city.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

402

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 11
Figure 5 Wildlife Connectivity Areas

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

403

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 12
Coastal Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City’s shoreline borders the San Francisco Bay and includes estuarine and brackish marshes, particularly near Belmont Slough and the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. These areas serve as vital feeding and nesting grounds for numerous bird species, including some species of special concern. The Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve, a protected 268-acre salt marsh, supports sensitive species such as the Alameda song sparrow and Ridgeway’s rail and serves as a critical ecological buffer against urban development.

Foster City has made significant investments in engineered flood protection systems, including recent upgrades to its levee system, which play a critical role in safeguarding the community from storm surge and sea level rise. These infrastructure improvements represent an essential layer of protection for residents and assets. At the same time, this flood protection infrastructure can constrain natural ecological processes and limit the inland migration of wetlands, which play a vital role in preserving local ecological integrity by providing habitat for diverse wildlife, serving as temporary resting areas for migrating species, filtering water pollutants, and offering natural flood protection. As climate change accelerates, coastal ecosystems face increasing stress from rising groundwater, saline intrusion, and greater exposure of infrastructure. The continued loss of tidal marshes would reduce habitat availability and diminish the shoreline’s natural ability to buffer wave energy and filter pollutants.

Regional planning efforts, such as those led by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and OneShoreline, recognize the importance of complementing traditional infrastructure with natural systems, such as tidal marshes and mudflats, to strengthen shoreline resilience. By restoring degraded habitat and integrating nature-based features into levee design, Foster City can build on its recent investments to ensure long-term ecological and community resilience.

Climate Considerations
Climate change presents significant risks to Foster City’s biological resources. Rising temperatures, shifts in precipitation patterns, and sea level rise pose risks to habitat health, food and water availability for

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

404

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 13
wildlife, while potentially limiting access to necessary wildlife connectivity and migration corridors. Low- lying shoreline habitats face potential inundation in the future, which would result in the loss of critical wetlands, biodiversity corridors, and coastal buffer zones. Urban green spaces, such as parks and vegetated areas along the lagoon and coastline, can serve as important refuges and movement corridors for wildlife. However, they currently offer limited climate resilience opportunities due to sparse tree canopy and fragmented natural areas.

Adapting to climate change requires a multifaceted strategy that includes nature-based solutions such as wetland restoration, permeable surfaces, and urban forestry. These solutions can help preserve biodiversity and support species resilience, as well as other benefits such as mitigating flooding, reducing urban heat, and supporting habitat migration. In addition, the city is exploring a citywide tree canopy study, which, when paired with surface heat mapping and social vulnerability data, could guide future investments in climate-resilient green infrastructure and improve neighborhood-level adaptation strategies.

Water Resources

Foster City, 2025.

Foster City maintains a network of engineered lagoons and canals designed primarily for stormwater management, flood control, and community recreation. These water features also provide secondary habitat for birds and aquatic species and are not used for potable water supply. The city’s drinking water is entirely imported via the Estero Municipal Improvement District, supplied by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Hetch Hetchy system. While Foster City does not currently utilize local groundwater for its municipal supply, it remains vulnerable to regional groundwater-level fluctuations driven by climate change. The development of this Element included coordination with EMID, and review of and alignment with applicable water supply, water quality, and groundwater management plans.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

405

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 14
Water Quality
Drinking water quality in Foster City is high, with the Estero Municipal Improvement District meeting or exceeding all State and federal standards. Water is treated at regional facilities before distribution and is continuously monitored. However, water quality issues are more pronounced in the city’s lagoon system, where elevated bacteria levels, especially enterococci, have led to periodic beach closures.

These issues are largely attributed to wildlife waste, stormwater runoff, and overgrown aquatic vegetation.

To address lagoon water quality, the City has adopted a Lagoon Management Plan, emphasizing routine monitoring, vegetation control, and public education. The city also participates in regional programs to prevent stormwater pollution and maintain compliance with the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. While efforts are underway, water quality in the lagoon and shoreline areas will remain a concern until planned actions for improving runoff management, enhancing ecological buffers, and managing urban wildlife populations are implemented.

Water Supply
Foster City’s water supply is entirely imported through the Hetch Hetchy system, managed by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. During normal years, supply is projected to be adequate through 2045. However, in single and multiple dry years, demand is projected to outpace supply, with deficits exceeding 800 million gallons annually by 2045 under drought conditions. In the event of a water shortage, the Estero Municipal Improvement District would implement its Water Shortage Contingency Plan which outlines a suite of water demand reduction measures of varying severity designed to protect health and safety, minimize economic disruption, and preserve environmental and community assets.

Nonetheless, the City is vulnerable to regional supply constraints, especially as climate change increases the frequency of dry periods.

Given this dependency, continued participation in regional conservation programs, alternative supply planning, and demand management will be essential. The Estero Municipal Improvement District’s Urban Water Management Plan identifies the need for coordinated planning with regional partners and highlights the importance of preparing for worst-case drought scenarios. While recycled water is not currently used, it presents potential opportunities to supplement current and future water supplies and serve as an emergency backup option as climate risks evolve.

Climate Considerations
Climate change poses several risks to Foster City’s water infrastructure and management systems. Rising sea levels may compromise the lagoon’s drainage function, particularly during high tides or storm events. Higher average temperatures could increase lagoon evaporation and elevate potential for harmful algal blooms. This increased potential is driven by higher concentrations of contaminants and warmer water temperatures that promote algal growth, threatening habitat quality and recreational use. Additionally, altered precipitation patterns are expected to intensify stormwater runoff, potentially degrading lagoon water quality and overwhelming existing infrastructure. Groundwater rise is also projected to threaten buried infrastructure due to rising sea levels, leading to potential seawater intrusion, and contribute to inland flooding. Although the city is not dependent on groundwater as a water source, rising water tables could affect public utilities, natural open spaces, and impact natural and landscaped vegetation.

To proactively address these risks, Foster City can continue to implement targeted adaptation strategies such as strengthening of levees, improved lagoon circulation, shoreline wetland restoration, and

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

406

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 15
integration of green stormwater infrastructure. Proactive monitoring of groundwater conditions, in collaboration with regional agencies, will be critical for planning for future risks. Ensuring the continued function of the lagoon as both a flood control and ecological system will be essential in the face of climate variability and sea level rise.

Air Quality
Air quality in Foster City is significantly influenced by regional emissions, increasing wildfire smoke frequency due to climate change, and local traffic. The city currently lacks comprehensive, localized air quality monitoring infrastructure to track these impacts accurately and instead relies on nearby stations for data, which may not accurately reflect localized conditions. Indoor air quality trends in public buildings are also not well-documented, leaving gaps in understanding the full scope of exposure.

Emerging challenges for air quality in Foster City include increased wildfire smoke events, rising temperatures, and cumulative pollution from nearby urban centers. High temperatures can increase the formation of ground-level ozone, while inversions can trap pollutants close to the ground, leading to increased concentrations of harmful substances. Low-cost sensor deployment, improved building ventilation systems, and cumulative exposure mapping can better assess air quality risks. Coordinated efforts with Bay Area Air Quality Management District and regional grant programs may support these actions and contribute to healthier environments for vulnerable populations.

Energy Resources
Foster City has implemented a range of initiatives that provide a strong foundation for further opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy resilience through upgrades to its parks, public buildings, and community infrastructure. Existing municipal facilities, including - community centers powered by Peninsula Clean Energy’s 100 percent carbon-free electricity program, ECO100, can further reduce electricity use and light pollution through energy efficiency upgrades like LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and renewable-powered water management systems. In areas where conventional grid connections are costly or impractical, solar-powered lighting offers a low- maintenance, renewable solution. Energy conservation also supports broader climate and sustainability goals, particularly when paired with smart building materials and all-electric systems in future facility upgrades or new construction.

The City is also well-positioned to expand on-site renewable energy and support clean transportation infrastructure. The Foster City Library currently includes roof-mounted solar panels and a recent feasibility study identified other municipal buildings, such as the forthcoming recreation center, as viable sites for photovoltaic (PV) systems. These, along with potential solar canopies over parking lots or maintenance buildings, could be paired with battery storage to improve emergency preparedness and grid reliability. Parks and civic buildings are also key locations for expanding EV charging infrastructure, particularly through public-private partnerships. Education and community engagement will play a central role in cultivating support for these initiatives, using public spaces as platforms for demonstrations, signage, and workshops that promote energy literacy and sustainable living practices.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

407

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 16
Engagement Results for Conservation
During the development of the Conservation Element, residents shared priorities and perspectives on the natural resources and conservation strategies for Foster City through pop-up events, focus group discussions, a workshop, and a survey. Key findings from these activities are summarized below.

Community Priorities Survey
A critical component of community input was the Community Priorities Survey conducted in June 2025 via online questionnaire. The Foster City community expressed strong support for enhancing parks, trails, and natural spaces, with a focus on comfort, connectivity, and safety. Amenities such as restrooms, shade, seating, and wildlife viewing platforms were identified as top priorities for improving trail use. The Levee Pedway is frequently used by residents, and there is significant interest in expanding trail and bike lane connections. Conservation emerged as a clear community value, with most respondents rating it as very or extremely important and voicing strong support for rewilding efforts like native habitat restoration and pollinator-friendly landscaping. While enthusiasm for rewilding was high, some concerns were raised about pests, upkeep, and potential changes to recreational spaces.

Survey participants identified key environmental concerns, including sea level rise, storm flooding, water scarcity, and poor air quality. Residents placed a high value on open spaces that offer opportunities to connect with nature, support biodiversity, provide shade, and reduce climate-related risks. The most desired improvements included more walking and biking paths, increased tree cover, and restoring natural areas with native vegetation. There was also strong support for integrating green infrastructure, such as rain gardens and wetlands, and expanding educational features and access for all ages and abilities.

The community supported a wide range of strategies to protect open space and natural resources, including stronger zoning regulations, public-private partnerships, volunteer maintenance programs, and development incentives. Residents expressed a clear desire for the Foster City Lagoon to support both active and passive recreation, along with aesthetic and community uses. In terms of climate communication, respondents wanted more information on local flood risks, sea level rise, and ways to prepare for climate impacts. Overall, the results reflect a community that values nature, recognizes the urgency of climate adaptation, and is eager to engage in shaping a more sustainable and resilient future.

Community Engagement Takeaways
Key themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process:

Support for Rewilding with Thoughtful Design

 There is strong community interest in rewilding efforts that restore native habitats, support pollinators, and enhance the ecological function of parks and open spaces.
 At the same time, many want these naturalized areas to be designed and maintained in ways that remain usable, safe, and visually appealing – balancing ecological goals with everyday recreation and comfort.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

408

Background

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 17
 Concerns were raised about the potential to attract nuisance wildlife such as geese, as well as the need for clear upkeep and visibility. The feedback underscores a desire for rewilding that enhances, rather than limits, the public’s experience of open space.

Naturalized and Functional Open Spaces

 Community members want parks and open spaces to feel more ecologically rich while remaining comfortable and accessible, with amenities like shade, seating, and natural materials integrated into the landscape.
 There is interest in expanding tree cover and using native vegetation to provide cooling, habitat value, and a more natural aesthetic across the city’s open spaces.
 Some suggested that conservation-oriented spaces still need to accommodate daily use, such as keeping restrooms open longer and providing places to rest, so that naturalized areas remain welcoming and inclusive.

Concern for Climate Risks

 Sea level rise, stormwater flooding, water scarcity, and declining air quality were repeatedly raised as major concerns.
 Open space is seen as a critical tool for addressing climate impacts, offering functions like cooling, habitat protection, and stormwater infiltration.  Community members want more communication from the City about local flood risks, sea level rise adaptation, and practical steps households can take to prepare.

Sustainable Open Space

 There is strong backing for strategies like zoning protections, green infrastructure, and developer incentives that prioritize open space and ecological function.
 Volunteer programs and partnerships with local organizations are viewed as effective ways to support ongoing restoration and stewardship.  People value the Foster City Lagoon as a space for both active and passive recreation, and want it protected for future generations.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

409

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 18
Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs
Biological Resources
Goal C-1 Natural habitat is protected and restored to support native biodiversity, improve ecological function, and enhance the resilience of open spaces.

Policy C-1.1 Wildlife Habitat. Protect and enhance Foster City’s existing habitats, including tidal wetlands, mudflats, and urban forests, to support native biodiversity and ecological health.

Policy C-1.2 Habitat Protection. Promote the restoration and naturalization of degraded or underutilized areas, particularly along the shoreline and coastal trails, through native vegetation planning and habitat enhancement.

Policy C-1.3 Support Biodiversity. Implement maintenance strategies that prioritize native vegetation and manage detrimental invasive plant and animal species in natural habitat areas. Allow non-native plants only if they support aesthetics or habitat without harming biodiversity. Select vegetation that attracts desirable species and discourages those that pose nuisance or ecological risks.

Goal C-2 Ecological connections between fragmented habitats are strengthened to facilitate wildlife movement, support species adaptation, and minimize the impacts of urban development on biodiversity.

Policy C-2.1 Habitat Connectivity. Improve connectivity between fragmented parks, shoreline areas, and natural spaces to support wildlife movement through restored corridors and green infrastructure.

Policy C-2.2 Wildlife Movement Design. Incorporate wildlife-friendly infrastructure, such as underpasses, vegetated buffers, and light controls into public infrastructure and land use planning.

Policy C-2.3 Movement Mitigation. Assess and mitigate barriers to wildlife movement caused by roads, levees, and urban development.

Policy C-2.4 Connectivity Partnerships. Coordinate with regional partners, including OneShoreline, to support connectivity and flood resilience through multi-benefit projects.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

410

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 19
Policy C-2.5 Habitat Improvements. Identify and prioritize habitat improvements that benefit migratory species, including birds and small mammals, in accordance with AB 1889.

Goal C-3 Foster City’s natural systems are resilient to the impacts of climate change.

Policy C-3.1 Climate Conscious Shoreline Management. Integrate sea level rise, flooding, and extreme weather considerations into shoreline habitat management and restoration.

Policy C-3.2 Nature-Based Solutions. Implement nature-based solutions, such as wetland buffers and marsh migration zones, to protect both ecological and human systems.

Policy C-3.3 Ecological Transitions. Support conservation strategies account for sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, and climate-driven shifts in habitat type, extent, and species composition.

Goal C-4 A community-wide ethic of environmental stewardship is fostered by engaging residents, regional partners, and organizations in the protection and enhancement of local natural resources.

Policy C-4.1 Public Awareness. Increase public awareness of urban wildlife, habitat conservation, and sustainable coexistence through education and outreach.

Policy C-4.2 Community Stewardship. Encourage community participation in habitat restoration, monitoring, and stewardship activities.

Policy C-4.3 Conservation Partnerships. Partner with regional agencies, nonprofits, and academic institutions to advance conservation and resilience objectives.

Water Resources
Goal C-5 Water resources are efficiently managed to support a sustainable, high-quality water supply for the community while promoting conservation, reducing demands, and protecting water systems from climate change.

Policy C-5.1 Water Quality Risk Prevention. Address water quality risks associated with climate change, including warming temperatures, increased turbidity, and the potential for algal blooms in the lagoon and stormwater systems.

Policy C-5.2 Water Quality Maintenance. Support ongoing maintenance and timely replacement of aging lagoon, stormwater, and water infrastructure to protect ecological function and recreational use.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

411

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 20
Policy C-5.3 Pollution Reduction. Improve lagoon circulation and implement pollution control measures to maintain water quality and mitigate contamination from urban runoff and other sources.

Policy C-5.4 Water Quality Programing. Expand participation in regional water quality programs, including the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program, to better manage stormwater runoff and protect the San Francisco Bay.

Policy C-5.5 Water Quality Monitoring. Incorporate regular monitoring and public reporting of water quality conditions into city operations to support data- driven decision-making and transparency.

Goal C-6 Foster City maintains a secure and sustainable water supply to support current and future community needs.

Policy C-6.1 Water Reliability. Collaborate with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to improve long-term water reliability, conservation strategies, and demand forecasting, especially under future drought conditions.

Policy C-6.2 Supplemental Water Supply. Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID) to explore alternative or supplemental water supply options and regularly update reliability assessments in response to climate trends.

Policy C-6.3 Water Neutrality. Implement and enforce the 2023 Water Neutrality Ordinance so that new development and redevelopment do not increase overall water demand.

Policy C-6.4 Water Conservation. Integrate water conservation, reuse, and efficiency measures into new development, infrastructure upgrades, and public education initiatives.

Air Quality
Goal C-7 Foster City is a healthy and climate-resilient community through reduced air pollution and improved air quality.

Policy C-7.1 Land Use Alignment. Align Foster City’s land use, transportation, and development decisions with air quality thresholds and best practices established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Policy C-7.2 Air Quality Mitigation. Incorporate air quality mitigation strategies into land use planning by requiring vegetative buffers, enhanced filtration systems, and site design strategies to reduce exposure near major transportation corridors and pollution sources.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

412

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 21
Policy C-7.3 Complete Streets. Encourage smart growth and complete streets principles that integrate air quality protection measures, such as shade trees and green infrastructure.

Policy C-7.4 VMT Reduction. Prioritize transportation and mobility improvements that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and emissions, including expansion of pedestrian, bicycle, and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure.

Policy C-7.5 Regional Air Quality Coordination. Enhance regional coordination and compliance with BAAQMD programs and participate in local implementation of Spare the Air and other outreach initiatives.

Goal C-8 Foster City’s neighborhoods are healthy, resilient, and equitable, with clean air and access to green spaces for all residents.

Policy C-8.1 Greening Air Improvements. Expand urban greening strategies that improve air quality and reduce urban heat, including targeted tree canopy expansion and the use of vegetated buffers in high-exposure areas.

Policy C-8.2 Tree City. Pursue Tree City USA designation and adopt a citywide tree ordinance that guides planting, removal, and long-term care of public trees, with a focus on air quality and shade equity.

Policy C-8.3 Air Quality Co-Benefits. Design public parks and open spaces to maximize air quality benefits while supporting climate adaptation and equitable access to green space.

Policy C-8.4 Air Quality Engagement. Promote public awareness and engagement on air quality topics through education programs, signage, and collaboration with regional partners.

Energy Resources
Goal C-9 Foster City’s public facilities and infrastructure operate sustainably with low-energy use and resilient systems that support a clean and climate-ready future.

Policy C-9.1 Improved Energy Efficiency. Improve energy efficiency in parks, public buildings, and community centers through lighting upgrades, smart controls, and design strategies that reduce both electricity consumption and light pollution.

Policy C-9.2 Renewable Energy Expansion. Expand the use of on-site renewable energy systems, particularly photovoltaic (PV) installations and battery storage, on City-owned facilities where cost-effective.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

413

Conservation Goals, Policies and Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 22
Policy C-9.3 EV Charging. Support the installation of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations in public parks, community centers, and City parking lots to enable a transition to clean transportation.

Policy C-9.4 Low-Carbon Construction. Promote all-electric systems and low-carbon construction practices in the design and retrofit of new municipal facilities.

Policy C-9.5 Energy Outreach. Use public spaces, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, as platforms for energy-related education, outreach, and engagement.

Policy C-9.6 Energy Efficiency in Green Infrastructure. Integrate energy efficiency and renewable energy into green infrastructure projects to enhance co- benefits for climate resilience, water conservation, and long-term cost savings.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

414

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 23
Implementation Programs
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-a Explore opportunities for habitat restoration and naturalization within the existing parks system through the following steps:
 Assess and map high-potential sites (e.g., degraded park edges, canal embankments, underutilized shoreline areas);
 Integrate habitat strategies into the next Parks Master Plan update or as part of implementation actions;
 Develop guidance for incorporating native habitat elements into future park renovations, new park development, and routine maintenance; and  Coordinate with restoration partners, schools, and community groups for implementation and stewardship.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2,
C-1.3
C-b Seek funding for a long-term maintenance plan for restored and naturalized habitat areas that includes seasonal invasive species removal, native plant reestablishment, irrigation reduction, and trash/debris removal. Consider pilot programs with community stewardship groups to assist with hands-on maintenance and monitoring.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.1, C-1.2
C-c Design and introduce educational signage at key natural areas (e.g., Belmont Slough, shoreline parks) with clear, engaging content about native ecosystems, local wildlife, and restoration goals. Include multilingual content, maps, and QR codes linking to informational websites. Encourage stewardship behaviors through signage, like staying on trails and avoiding disturbance of wildlife.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-1.3
C-d Continue to explore suitable levee-adjacent zones to retrofit with ecotone features that support both flood protection and habitat enhancement. Engage with OneShoreline, regional restoration partners, and permitting agencies to align with long-term sea level rise adaptation planning and pursue funding for design and implementation.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-1.3

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

415

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 24
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-e Explore opportunities to better understand and improve ecological connectivity across the city. This may include studying ecological connectivity and mapping of habitat patches, identifying barriers (e.g., roads, fences, lighting), and evaluating where enhancements could support multi-species movement, especially along Belmont Slough, lagoon edges, and gaps between open spaces. Where feasible, consider coordination with regional experts and agencies to assess general habitat needs and potential improvements over time.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.2,
C-2.3, C-2.5 C-f Encourage the inclusion of wildlife-supportive features into infrastructure and discretionary development projects where appropriate. These features may include safe road crossings, native vegetative buffers, wildlife-friendly fencing, down-shielded lighting, and mitigation measures for existing barriers.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Ongoing C-2.2, C-2.3,
C-2.5
C-g Assess local habitat mitigation opportunities (e.g., offsetting development impacts) and create a grant funding strategy targeting AB 1889, Wildlife Conservation Board, and Proposition 1 programs. Design packaged projects with detailed scopes, cost estimates, and co-benefits to enhance competitiveness for funding.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Mid-term C-2.1, C-2.5
C-h Coordinate with OneShoreline, San Mateo Resource Conservation District, nonprofit organizations, and research institutions on joint grant applications, technical studies, and pilot projects that advance shared conservation goals, consistent with this Conservation Element.

Community
Development
Parks and Recreation Long-term C-4.3
C-i Enhance the City’s water quality monitoring program to include indicators influenced by climate change, such as water temperature, turbidity, algal growth, and bacteria levels. Encourage the installation of real-time sensors at key locations in the lagoon system and stormwater outfalls, and use this data to inform water quality advisories, infrastructure upgrades, and restoration planning.

Public Works Mid-term C-5.1
C-j Consider capital improvement project phasing to minimize disruption and align with sea level rise adaptation efforts.

Public Works Parks and Recreation Long-term C-5.2

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

416

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 25
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-k Continue to implement targeted strategies to reduce non-point source pollution, such as installing pet waste stations in parks, increasing street sweeping near outfalls, and adding trash capture devices in key storm drains.

Coordinate these efforts with the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan to reduce the impacts of the goose population on water quality. Seek to pair these efforts with a multilingual public education campaign on pollution prevention, lagoon protection, and green infrastructure.

Parks and
Recreation/Pu
blic Works
Community Development Ongoing C-5.3
C-l Support increased City participation in regional water quality initiatives, such as the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program. Identify City staff to represent Foster City in interagency meetings and explore co- funding or joint implementation of stormwater retrofits.

Public Works Community Development Mid-term C-5.4
C-m Encourage the Estero Municipal Improvement District to explore use of alternative water sources such as greywater or direct potable reuse to support the city’s long-term water reliability and sustainability goals.

Public
Works/Commu
nity
Development
Long-term C-6.2
C-n Explore additional opportunities to establish partnerships with local and regional agencies and organizations to develop a public outreach campaign to increase awareness of existing water conservation programs and provide education on water conservation, targeting residents, schools, and businesses.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-6.4
C-o Develop a set of planning and design guidelines for locating sensitive land uses (e.g., schools, senior housing) near high-traffic roadways. The guidelines should recommend best practices such as building orientation, MERV-13 or higher HVAC filtration, vegetated screening, and site layout strategies to reduce pollutant exposure. Integrate these standards into development review and environmental review processes where feasible.

Community
Development
Public Works Mid-term C-7.1, C-7.2
C-p As part of future maintenance projects, identify opportunities to install vegetative buffers, such as hedgerows, or bioswales between roads and sensitive land uses. Prioritize high-performing vegetation species suited to pollution absorption and local climate when installing new landscaping in these areas.

Public Works Community Development Ongoing C-7.2, C-7.3

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

417

Implementation Programs

Chapter 8: Conservation Element 26
Number Program
Lead
Department Supporting Department(s) Timeframe1
Implementing
Policy(ies)
C-q Review and enhance the City’s Complete Streets and public realm guidelines to include stormwater planters, permeable paving, and native landscaping as standard components of street design to support air quality, active transportation, and neighborhood cooling, particularly in areas with higher pollution exposure.

Public Works Community Development Long-term C-5.1, C-5.3, C-7.3, C-7.4
C-r Support ongoing coordination with BAAQMD to help keep the City’s plans and policies generally align with regional air quality standards and emission reduction targets. Participate in updates to the Clean Air Plan and pursue grant funding to implement local air quality improvement projects.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Annual C-7.5
C-s Conduct a tree inventory and prioritize new plantings near schools and major roads where vegetation can mitigate air quality and urban heat impacts.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Mid-term C-8.1, C-8.3
C-t Pursue the development of a tree ordinance that governs planting, maintenance, and removal of City-owned and potentially private trees, including a permit system, replacement ratios, and performance standards.

Align ordinance goals with air quality, climate, and equity outcomes.

Parks and
Recreation
Community Development Short-term C-8.2
C-u As part of future updates to the Climate Action Plan, update audits of energy use in existing municipal buildings to evaluate efficacy of energy conservation measures. Implement upgrades such as LED lighting, motion sensors, timers, and smart ventilation and irrigation systems in buildings, restrooms, pathways, and sports facilities.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Mid-term C-9.1, C-9.6
C-v Advance photovoltaic installations at City-owned buildings and parking lots based on the recent feasibility study, beginning with priority sites like the Library/Community Center and planned Recreation Center. Explore solar canopies over large, paved areas and pair installations with battery storage for emergency backup and energy cost optimization.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.2, C-9.6
C-w Identify opportunities to install EV charging stations at high-traffic public facilities such as community centers, parks, and libraries that are accessible to all residents.

Community
Development
Parks and
Recreation/Public Works
Long-term C-9.3
1 Timeframes are categorized as short-term (1-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). Programs that are on an ongoing or annual basis are identified as such.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

418

EXHIBIT B
Conservation Element Legislative Consistency Checklist

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

419

EXHIBIT B
Conservation Element Legislative Consistency Checklist
Government Code Section Description of Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code,
§§ 65302(d)(1), 65352.5
The Conservation Element
must plan for the
conservation, sustainable
development, and utilization
of water resources,
including their hydraulic
force and role in ecological
systems.

Addressed The Element discusses Foster City’s lagoon
and stormwater systems, regional water
supply (Hetch Hetchy via EMID),
groundwater vulnerability, and flood control
levees. Goals C-5 and C-6, and programs C-
i through C-n, specifically address water
quality, water supply reliability, conservation,
and hydraulic risks.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(3) The Conservation Element
must provide strategies to
conserve and accommodate
floodwaters, including
watershed management,
stormwater retention, and
groundwater recharge.

Addressed The Element identifies the lagoon and bay
as floodwater accommodation for the city.

Goals C-3 and C-5 highlight sea level rise,
flood risk adaptation, and stormwater
infrastructure planning (Programs C-d, C-j,
C-q).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve forest
resources and manage
them for sustainability,
including coordination with
wildfire risk reduction and
carbon sequestration goals.

Addressed While Foster City does not have traditional
forests, the Element treats its urban forest as
a conservation resource. Policies C-1.1, C-

1.2, and Goal C-8 (Tree City ordinance, tree
canopy expansion) emphasize ecological
and air quality functions of tree cover.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must promote the
responsible use and
conservation of soils,
addressing agricultural
productivity, erosion control,
and protection of prime
farmland.

Addressed The Element addresses erosion indirectly via
shoreline stabilization, wetland restoration,
and ecotone design (Goal C-3, Program C-
d). While Foster City is highly urbanized, soil
stability and shoreline resilience are
considered under climate and flood planning.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve and protect
rivers, streams, wetlands,
and other waters by
addressing watershed
protection, water quality,
and ecological function.

Addressed Covers lagoon system, Belmont and Seal
Slough, and San Francisco Bay shoreline.

Policies C-5.3–C-5.5 and Programs C-i
through C-l address water quality,
stormwater pollution reduction, and habitat
functions of these waters.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must provide for the
conservation and planned
use of harbors and
associated coastal
resources to support
commerce, recreation, and
environmental quality.

Not Applicable Foster City does not contain harbors; only lagoons and shoreline recreation.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must support the
conservation and
sustainable use of fisheries,
including aquatic habitat
protection and long-term
viability of fish populations.

Not Applicable Foster City does not have commercial
fisheries.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must conserve wildlife and
their habitats, ensuring
biodiversity, ecological
connectivity, and protection
of sensitive species.

Addressed Extensive coverage in narrative, as well as
Goals C-1 and C-2, Policies C-1.1–C-2.5,
and Programs C-a–C-g, which emphasize
habitat protection, restoration, biodiversity,
wildlife movement, and AB 1889 compliance.

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

420

Government Code Section Description of Requirement
Consistency
Status Compliance Notes
Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must inventory, protect, and
manage mineral resources,
including guiding extraction
and reclamation consistent
with State mapping and
conservation policies.

Not Applicable No mineral resources identified in Foster City.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(1) The Conservation Element
must consider and provide
policies for the conservation
of other locally significant
natural resources, such as
geothermal, scenic, or
unique ecological features.

Addressed Energy, air quality, and cultural/tribal
resources are included. Policies C-7.1
through C-9.6 address air, energy, and
climate resilience.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Reclamation of land and
waters (optional)
Addressed The Element acknowledges Foster City’s
history of reclaimed marshland and
emphasizes ongoing shoreline restoration
and rewilding strategies (Background:

Biological Resources; Policies C-1.2, C-3.2;
Program C-a).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Pollution of streams and
other waters (optional)
Addressed The Element includes lagoon water quality
challenges, stormwater management, and
regional compliance. Policies C-5.3–C-5.5
and Programs C-k, C-l directly address water
pollution prevention.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Land use in stream
channels and other areas
(optional)
Addressed Policies C-2.1, C-2.2, and Program C-o
incorporate land use and infrastructure
planning near waterways, balancing
ecological and recreational functions.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Erosion (optional) Addressed The Element discusses shoreline erosion and wetland migration constraints. Programs
C-d (levee ecotone retrofits) and C-j
(phasing infrastructure to reduce impacts)
address erosion.

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Protection of watersheds
(optional)
Addressed Watershed protection measures appear in
coordination with RWQCB, stormwater
pollution prevention, and green infrastructure
planning (Policies C-5.4, C-5.5; Programs C-
l, C-q).

Gov. Code, § 65302(d)(2) Rock, sand, and gravel
resources (optional)
Not Applicable No local deposits identified.

AB 1889 (2024) – Gov.

Code §65302(d), §65302(e)
Requires updates to the
conservation element of the
general plan to address
wildlife movement and
habitat connectivity. This
includes identifying and
analyzing connectivity areas
and existing or planned
wildlife passage features, as
well as implementing
measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate
barriers to wildlife
movement.

Addressed Fully integrated – Background includes
wildlife connectivity mapping; Goals C-2 and
Policies C-2.1–C-2.5 specifically align with
AB 1889. Programs C-e through C-g commit
to mapping corridors, incorporating wildlife-
friendly design, and pursuing funding

7.1 Attachment 8 - Planning Commission Resolution P-13-25

421

DATE:November 3, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA:Stefan Chatwin, City Manager
Marlene Subhashini, Assistant City Manager
FROM:Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director
DEPARTMENT: Public Works Department
SUBJECT:REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 10.24 OF THE

FOSTER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE (REGARDING SPEED LIMITS

IN THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY) TO ADD DEFINITIONS,
REDUCE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS AND ESTABLISH 15-

MPH SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS NEAR SCHOOLS,

AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Introduce by title only and waive further reading of the attached ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 10.24 (Regarding Speed Limits in the City of Foster City) of the Foster City Municipal Code to add definitions, reduce prima facie speed limits and establish 15-mph speed limits on certain streets near schools, and other administrative changes; and

2. By resolution, approve the attached signage plan; and

3. Find the actions exempt from review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) section 15061(b)(3).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council expressed interest in lower speed limits adjacent to schools. To support this request, the City had to conduct Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS)/Speed Survey as required by the State of California, per section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce

7.2 7.2 Staff Report

422

those limits using radar or other speed-measuring devices. Given the traffic related concerns and safety near schools, staff hired Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. (Hexagon) to study the roadway segments adjacent to public schools and provide their recommendation on lowering speed limits. Based on their study, the City could lower the speed limit to 15-mph when children are present at 7 of the 13 roadways near schools. The implementation of the new speed limits would require amending the City’s Municipal Code, and the installation of new signage. If adopted, staff will purchase the necessary signage estimated at $6,000 and construct the signage plan provided by Hexagon over the couple of months following approval. The public will be notified of the new traffic changes and City staff will work with the school district to provide additional education.

BACKGROUND
At the regular City Council meeting of April 7, 2025 meeting, Mayor Jimenez requested to agendize a discussion on lowering the speed limits within school zones and received support of Councilmembers Venkat and Sullivan.

On May 13, 2025, the City executed a Task Order with one of the City’s on-call consultants, Hexagon, to study the streets adjacent to four (4) Foster City Public Schools for feasibility to lower the speed limits.

On June 16, 2025, the City Council adopted the City’s Local Roads Safety Plan (LRSP) which emphasizes public safety, eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries throughout the City through the implementation of various improvements, policies, and practices. One of the practices includes lowering the speed limits around schools.

On September 11, 2025, and again on September 25, 2025 staff presented the results of the Speed Survey around these schools to the Traffic Review Committee (TRC) for review and comment. The TRC unanimously approved to recommend to the City Council the reduction of the 7 streets to 15-mph.

Chapter 10.24 of the Foster City Municipal Code (FCMC) outlines the City/District’s requirements for speed limits. With the approval of Assembly Bill 321 (AB321) in 2007, the State of California modified California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22358.4 to provide local jurisdictions the authority to establish 15-mph speed limits on residential streets within 500 feet of a school boundary when children are present. The law intends to enhance children’s safety while walking and bicycling to and from school by reducing vehicle speeds in the immediate area.

To qualify for a 15-mph speed limit in a school zone, a street is required to meet the following conditions:
a. Must be residential street with a maximum of two lanes (one in each direction); b. The existing speed limit of the street is 30 mph or less; and c. Streets are within 500 feet from a school property.

7.2 7.2 Staff Report

423

ANALYSIS
The Hexagon evaluation studied a total of 13 roadway segments adjacent to Brewer Island Elementary School, Audubon Elementary School, Foster City Elementary School, and Bowditch Middle School. Based on their study, there are 7 roadway segments eligible for 15-mph speed limits (within 500 feet of the school) for those locations currently with a 25-mph posted speed limit approaching the school zone (Balclutha Dr. was originally included in the study, but was later identified as not being contiguous with the school grounds, therefore not eligible for consideration):

1. Crane Avenue (Audubon Elementary School)

2. Gull Avenue (Audubon Elementary School)

3. Swordfish Street (Bowditch Middle School)

4. Tarpon Street (Bowditch Middle School)

5. Niantic Drive (Brewer Island Elementary School)

6. Polynesia Drive (Brewer Island Elementary School)

7. Polaris Avenue (Foster City Elementary School)
In addition, it is recommended that an extended 25-mph school speed limit be implemented at the following locations (within 500 feet to 1,000 feet from school grounds), to provide progressive speed reduction for those locations currently with a 30- mph posted speed limit approaching the school zone:

1. Gull Avenue

2. Polynesia Avenue
School speed limit zones have been implemented in several Bay Area cities including South San Francisco, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Redwood City, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, and San Jose. The reduced speeds can lower the likelihood and severity of collisions for all road users. This is in line with the City’s vision for safer complete streets and will help with future bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements.

To codify the school speed limit zones, the proposed ordinance would amend Chapter

10.24-Speed Limits, within Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic, of the Foster City Municipal Code to include these reduced school speed limit zones. In addition to the changes to speed limits in school zones, the proposed ordinance would also add a stated purpose and definition sections to Chapter 10.24. The added language is shown in red text in Attachment 1.

Signage Plan
In addition to adopting the updated school speed limit zones, the City will be required to install proper signage. Hexagon developed a signage plan which will require the removal of 20 existing signs, the construction of 15 new poles, and the installation of 46 signs. If approved, installation will be performed in-house by staff following community outreach and procurement of signs and appurtenances, over a period of approximately two months. The City will not be able to enforce the lower speed limits until proper

7.2 7.2 Staff Report

424

signage is in place. Staff will coordinate with the Police Department as signage is installed.

Outreach
Staff will share information on the City’s social media platforms and project webpage to inform the public about the change in traffic patterns. Additionally, staff has shared information about tonight’s meeting with the school district and notification letters will be sent to property owners adjacent to new pole installations.

CEQA
This proposed ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 10.24 and Resolution to adopt the proposed signage plan is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment. Further, even if the ordinance was deemed to be a project subject to CEQA, the City Council finds the proposed ordinance is exempt from CEQA under the common sense exemption set forth in Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and thus where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the update to this ordinance has no material fiscal impact. However, the costs of materials to install signage is anticipated to be $6,000 and will be funded through the Streets Operating Budget. Installation will be provided for by City Staff.

CITY COUNCIL VISION, MISSION, AND VALUE/PRIORITY AREA
Facilities and Infrastructure and Public Safety and Social Equity

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Proposed Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Resolution
Attachment 3 – Foster City 2025 School Zone E&TS Study by Hexagon Attachment 4 – Signage Plan

7.2 7.2 Staff Report

425

3 9
8 6
ORDINANCE NO. ________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 10.24 (REGARDING SPEED LIMITS IN THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY) TO ADD DEFINITIONS, REDUCE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS AND ESTABLISH 15 MPH

SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS NEAR SCHOOLS, AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES; AND FINDING ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM REVIEW

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, as set forth in California Vehicle Code, Section 21, the State of California has asserted broad authority over, and a statewide interest in, the entire field of regulating vehicles and traffic. The State has established a set of prima facie speed limits applicable to various classes roadway types, districts and locations (see California Vehicle Code Sections 22348 through 22366); and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code sections 22357 and 22358 further allow the City to determine and declare prima facie speed limits, by ordinance, that increase or decrease existing prima facie speed limits, provided that the revised prima facie speed limits are determined based on an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, on or around July 14, 2025, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., a traffic engineering consultant, completed an engineering and traffic survey (“ETS”).

The Survey provides background information; analysis results of the street and traffic conditions, and recommendations for decreasing prima facie speed limits for 7 street segments analyzed on streets within the City; and
WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22358.4 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Section 7B.15, allows a local authority the flexibility, by ordinance to reduce speed limits to 15mph within 500 feet of school grounds and an extended 25 mph prima facie speed limit within 500 to 1,000 feet from school grounds , after completing an engineering and traffic survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), a “project” is defined in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (a) as “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment”. The City Council hereby finds that the action to adopt this ordinance will not result in any change in the environment and thus is not a project subject to the requirements of CEQA. Further, even if this ordinance was deemed to be a project subject

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

426

3 9
8 6
to CEQA, the City Council finds the proposed ordinance is exempt from CEQA under the common sense exemption set forth in Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and thus where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Section 2. The Council makes the following findings as part of the adoption of this ordinance:

A. In accordance with Section 22358.4, after conducting the ETS, certain streets studied met the following requirements: (1) the street segment is within a residential district; (2) the street segment just beyond the school zone has a posted speed limits of 30mph or less, and (3) the street segment has no more than two traffic lanes, and the City Council is authorized to reduce speed limits on these roads to 15 miles per hour.

B. In accordance with Section 22358.4, the City Council finds that certain streets listed in Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study dated July 14, 2025, and prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, satisfy the above criteria, and the City Council is authorized to reduce speed limits to 15 miles per hour and 25 mph as recommended in the study, attached hereto.

Section 3. Chapter 10.24, “Speed Limits” within Title 10, “Vehicles and Traffic” of the Foster City Municipal Code is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
“Chapter 10.24 - SPEED LIMITS”
Sections:

10.24.010 Purpose

10.24.020 Definitions

10.24.030 Increase to thirty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

10.24.040 Decrease to forty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

10.24.050 Decrease to thirty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

10.24.060 Twenty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

10.24.070 Fifteen miles per hour School Zone– Streets designated.

10.24.080 Twenty-five miles per hour School Zone– Streets designated.

10.24.090 Limits effective when.

10.24.100 Signing.

10.24.010 Purpose.

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

427

3 9
8 6
A. The State of California has asserted broad authority over, and a statewide interest in, the entire field of regulating vehicles and traffic, as set forth in the California Vehicle Code, Section 21.

B. The State has established a set of prima facie speed limits applicable to various classes of roadway types, districts and locations (see California Vehicle Code Sections 22348 through 22366). In California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, the State has expressly authorized the City to establish declared speed limits that differ from the prima facie speed limits set under state law, if, based on engineering and traffic surveys, the declared speed limit would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicles and traffic, and would be reasonable and safe.

C. The intent of this chapter is to implement the City's authority to establish declared speed limits when supported by engineering and traffic surveys and to respond to safety and use of the road by people driving, walking, and bicycling.

10.24.020 Definitions.

A. "Declared speed limit" means the speed limits for individual streets and roadway segments determined and declared by the City Council in accordance with this chapter, as authorized by the California Vehicle Code. The term "declared speed limit" (as used in this chapter) shall include the "declared prima facie speed limit" or "maximum speed limit" (as used in California Vehicle Code Section 22357), or the "prima facie speed limit" (as used in California Vehicle Code Sections 22358, 22358.3 and 22358.4).

B. "Director" means the Public Works Director, or a designee of the Public Works Director or the City Manager
C. "Prima facie speed limits" means the default speed limits for streets and highways established under California State Law, as generally set forth in the California Vehicle Code, particularly Sections 22348, et. seq., unless amended under this chapter.

D. “School zone” means an area of a City street or highway within 500 feet of school grounds in any direction, unless otherwise posted, marked with appropriate signs giving notice of the area.

10.24.030 Increase to thirty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22357 of the Vehicle Code of the state and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the departments of police, public works and community development, it is determined that a speed greater than twenty-five miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic, and the council declares that a prima facie speed limit of thirty-five miles per hour would be reasonable and safe upon the portions of the following city streets:

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

428

3 9
8 6
A. Foster City Boulevard, from the intersection of East Hillsdale Boulevard to the intersection of Beach Park Boulevard;
B. Edgewater Boulevard, from the intersection of East Hillsdale Boulevard to the intersection of Biscayne Avenue;
C. Shell Boulevard, from the intersection of East Hillsdale Boulevard to the intersection of Beach Park Boulevard.

10.24.040 Decrease to forty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the state and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the departments of police, public works, and community development, it is determined that the limit of fifty- five miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe, and the council declares that a prima facie speed limit of forty-five miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and be reasonable and safe upon the portion of the following streets:

A. Third Avenue, from the westerly city limits to the intersection of Foster City Boulevard;
B. East Hillsdale Boulevard, from the westerly city limits to Shell Boulevard.

10.24.050 Decrease to thirty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the state and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the departments of police, public works and community development, it is determined that the limit of fifty- five miles per hour is more than is reasonable and safe, and the council declares that a prima facie speed limit of thirty-five miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and be reasonable and safe upon the portion of the following streets:

A. Foster City Boulevard, from the intersection of Third Avenue to the intersection of East Hillsdale Boulevard;
B. East Hillsdale Boulevard, from Shell Boulevard to Gull Avenue; C. Beach Park Boulevard, from the easterly termination of Gull Avenue at East Hillsdale Boulevard to Edgewater Boulevard;
D. Edgewater Boulevard from the northerly city limits line with San Mateo to East Hillsdale Boulevard.

10.24.060 Twenty-five miles per hour—Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the state and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the departments of police, public works and community development, it is determined that the limit of fifty-

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

429

3 9
8 6
five miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe, and the council declares that a prima facie speed limit of twenty-five miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and be reasonable and safe upon the portion of the following street:

A. Shell Boulevard, from the intersection of East Hillsdale Boulevard to the intersection of Bounty Drive.

10.24.070 Fifteen miles per hour School Zone– Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22358.4 of California Vehicle Code and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the Public Works Department, it is determined that the limit of twenty-five miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe, and the Council declares that a prima facie speed limit of fifteen miles per hour while children are present would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and be reasonable and safe upon the portion of the following streets within 500 feet of school grounds:

A. Crane Avenue – Audubon Elementary School
B. Gull Avenue – Audubon Elementary School
C. Swordfish Street – Bowditch Middle School
D. Tarpon Street – Bowditch Middle School
E. Niantic Drive – Brewer Island Elementary School
F. Polynesia Drive – Brewer Island Elementary School
G. Polaris Avenue – Foster City Elementary School

10.24.080 Twenty-five miles per hour School Zone– Streets designated.

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 22358.4 of California Vehicle Code and based upon an engineering and traffic survey conducted by the Public Works Department, it is determined that the limit of thirty miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe, and the council declares that a prima facie speed limit of twenty five miles per hour while children are present would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and be reasonable and safe upon the portion of the following streets between 500 to 1000 feet of school grounds:

A. Gull Avenue – Audubon Elementary School
B. Polynesia Avenue – Brewer Island Elementary School

10.24.090 Limits effective when.

The prima facie speed limits established in this chapter shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the portions of the streets so designated.

10.24.100 Signing.

The traffic engineer is directed to cause appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limits established in this chapter to be erected and maintained.”

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

430

3 9
8 6
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares every section, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase of this ordinance to be severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases.

Section 5. This Ordinance of the City of Foster City shall take effect and be in force 30 days and in accordance with CVC 22358.4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the ordinance shall not be enforced until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the roadway.

Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish the ordinance in accordance with applicable law.

This ordinance was introduced and read on the 3rd day of November 2025, and passed and adopted on the ___ day of __________ 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________

STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

7.2 Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance

431

3 9
8 7
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOSTER CITY

AUTHORIZING A SIGNAGE PLAN FOR SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT ZONES AND FINDING

ACTION EXEMPT FROM REVIEW PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3)

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, City Council directed staff to investigate lowering speed limits around schools; and
WHEREAS, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. (Hexagon) were hired and prepared a report titled Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study, which recommended lowering the speed limits of 7 of the 13 roadways adjacent to schools; and WHEREAS, Hexagon prepared a signage plan to lower the speed limits as recommended in their study; and
WHEREAS, following the Traffic Review Committee meetings held on September 11, and 25, 2025, the committee unanimously recommended the approval for City Council to lower the speed limits adjacent to schools.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Foster City hereby finds that the action will not result in any change in the environment and thus is not a project as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 (a).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby authorizes the installation of signs in accordance with the signage plan, attached hereto, based on the Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study.

PASSED AND ADOPTED as a resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City at the regular meeting held on the 3rd day of November 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

STACY JIMENEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PRISCILLA SCHAUS, CITY CLERK

7.2 Attachment 2 - Resolution

432

Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study July 14, 2025

Reviewed By: Memorandum

Date: July 14, 2025, 2025

To: Justin Lai, Foster City Public Works

From: Jonathan Chang
Timothy Chang P.E.

Jeffrey Elia P.E.

Subject: Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study

Introduction
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a Reduced School Speed Limit Study in Foster City, California. The purpose of the study was to determine which street segments adjacent to schools qualify for a reduced 15 miles per hour (mph) school speed limit within 500 feet of school grounds and/or a 25 mph school speed limit extended out from 500 to 1,000 feet from school grounds. The study segments, along with the current posted speed limit at each location, are listed below and are shown on Figure 1.

Study Segments
Audubon Elementary School

1. Crane Avenue (25 mph)

2. Gull Avenue (30 mph)*
Beach Park Elementary School

3. Beach Park Boulevard (35 mph)*

4. Shell Boulevard (35 mph)*
Bowditch Middle School

5. Beach Park Boulevard (35 mph)*

6. Swordfish Street (25 mph)

7. Tarpon Street (25 mph)
Brewer Island Elementary School

8. Balclutha Drive (30 mph)*

9. Niantic Drive (not posted, 25 mph prima facie speed limit)

10. Polynesia Drive (30 mph)*
Foster City Elementary School

11. Beach Park Boulevard (25 mph/35 mph)*

12. Edgewater Boulevard (40 mph)*

13. Polaris Avenue (25 mph)*
*Previously studied in the citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) study (see attachment D)

7.2 Attachment 3 - Foster City 2025 School Zone ETS Study by Hexagon

433

1 0
1 Redwood
City
Foster
City
San
Mateo
Belmont
1 2
6 7
8 9
10 3
11 12
13 4
5 101
92 San Mateo Bridge
Tarpon StTarpon St
Niantic DrNiantic Dr
Swordfish StSwordfish St
Audubon
Elementary School
Audubon
Elementary School
Bowditch
Middle
School
Bowditch
Middle
School
Foster City
Elementary
School
Foster City
Elementary
School Farragut
Blvd
Farragut
Blvd
Beach Park
Elementary
School
Beach Park
Elementary
School
Brewer Island
Elementary School
Brewer Island
Elementary School
Boothbay AveBoothbay Ave
A
l
t
a
i
r

A
v
e
H
a
l
s
e
y

B
l
v
d
P
o
l
y
n
e
s
i
a

D
r
B
o
u
n
t
y

D
r
P
i
t
c
a
i
r
n

D
r
P
o
l
a
r
i
s

A
v
e
B
a
f
f
i
n

S
t
B
a
l
c
l
u
t
h
a

D
r
M
e
t
r
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
l
v
d
C
r
a
n
e

A
v
e
V
i
n
t
a
g
e

P
a
r
k

D
r
G
u
l
l

A
v
e
C
h
e
s
s

D
r
M
a
r
l
i
n

A
v
e
S
h
e
l
l

B
l
v
d
E

3 r
d

A
v
e
P
o
r
t

R
o
y
a
l

A
v
e
E
d
g
e
w
a
t
e
r

B
l
v
d
E

H
i
l
l
s
d
a
l
e

B
l
v
d
F
o
s
t
e
r

C
i
t
y

B
l
v
d
B
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
k

B
l
v
d
= 35 MPH
= 25 MPH
= Not Posted
(25 mph Prima
Facie Speed Limit)
= 30 MPH
= 40 MPH
Existing Posted
Speed Limits
= Study Segment
Number
= Foster City
X
Foster City 2025 Reduced School Speed Limit Study
Figure 1
Study Locations and Existing Posted Speed Limits

7.2 Attachment 3 - Foster City 2025 School Zone ETS Study by Hexagon

434

Foster City 2025 School Zone E&TS Study July 14, 2025

P a g e | 3
One of the requirements for a 15 mph reduced school speed limit is that the street segment shall have a posted speed limit of 30 mph or less. Therefore, E&TS studies should be prepared for the establishment of general posted speed zones prior to evaluating whether a street segment qualifies for the reduced school speed limit. Once a general posted speed limit has been established on a street segment, the street segment can then be evaluated to determine whether it qualifies for a reduced school speed limit based on the requirements of the CVC and the CA MUTCD. The requirements for a reduced school speed limit are discussed in further detail in the following sections.
2024 E&TS Study Segments
The previously completed citywide E&TS study is used as a basis for the posted speed limits of nine of the street segments listed above.

New E&TS Study Segments
As part of this study, additional E&TS studies have been conducted in accordance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) for the establishment of posted speed zones for the four segments that were not previously studied:
• Crane Avenue,
• Niantic Drive,
• Swordfish Street, and
• Tarpon Street.

7.2 Attachment 3 - Foster City 2025 School Zone ETS Study by Hexagon

435

Foster City 2025 School Zone E&TS Study July 14, 2025

P a g e | 4
Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Setting General Posted Speed Limits
Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) are required by the State of California to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed-measuring devices.

Since the following study segments did not have E&TS completed in the last 7 years, new E&TS are required to determine the appropriate posted speed limits on the approaches to school zones for these locations:

1. Crane Avenue (Audubon Elementary School)

2. Niantic Drive (Brewer Island Elementary School)

3. Swordfish Street (Bowditch Middle School)

4. Tarpon Street (Bowditch Middle School)

The E&TS for the remaining nine previously studied street segments are contained in Attachment D.

← All documents from this meeting