General Plan Parks and Open Space Element
and Conservation Element
Engagement Results Summary
prepared by
City of Foster City
Community Development Department
610 Foster City Boulevard
Foster City, California 94404
Contact: Vanessa Brannon, Senior Management Analyst
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
66 Franklin Street, Suite 200
Oakland, California 94607
September 2025
Table of Contents
Engagement Results Summary i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Engagement Activity Results ................................................................................................ 2
2.1 Community Priorities Survey ...................................................................................... 2
2.2 Pop-Up Events .......................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Joint Workshop .......................................................................................................... 3
2.4 Focus Groups ............................................................................................................ 3
2.4.1 Community Organizations Focus Group ...................................................... 3
2.4.2 Regional and Technical Non-Governmental Organizations Focus Group ............................................................................................... 4
2.5 Senate Bill (SB) 18 Tribal Consultation Results ......................................................... 5
2.6 Public Comment Period ............................................................................................. 5 3 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 19 Tables
Table 1 Public Comments....................................................................................................... 6 Appendices
Appendix A Community Priorities Survey Results
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
ii
This page intentionally left blank.
Introduction
Engagement Results Summary 1
1 Introduction
The City of Foster City has undertaken a series of engagement activities to inform the updates to its Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element. These efforts were designed to capture a wide range of community voices, from residents who regularly use the City’s parks to regional organizations focused on conservation and resilience. Engagement activities included a community priorities survey, two pop-up events, a joint workshop, two focus groups, formal consultation with local tribes under Senate Bill (SB) 18, and a public comment period.
The concurrently developed Parks Master Plan also included its own engagement process, some of which overlapped with these activities. While the General Plan updates drew from that shared input where relevant, activities scoped specifically for the Parks Master Plan are not included in this summary, as they are documented in a separate summary of engagement.
Together, these activities provided a comprehensive understanding of the community’s priorities, concerns, and aspirations for the future of Foster City’s parks, natural resources, and open spaces.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
2 2 Engagement Activity Results
2.1 Community Priorities Survey
The Community Priorities Survey was designed to build upon the input provided through surveys collected for the Parks Master Plan effort and establish baseline information about resident values, preferences, and concerns regarding Foster City’s park system and natural resources. It was distributed both digitally and at in-person events, ensuring that residents across different demographics could participate. Ninety-two responses to the survey were received. Survey questions and responses collected are found in Attachment A.
Survey results revealed strong support for improving trail amenities, such as additional shade, seating, and restrooms. Respondents also identified the need for better wayfinding signage and lighting to improve safety along paths and in park spaces. Rewilding efforts, such as restoring native habitats, expanding pollinator-friendly landscapes, and increasing tree canopy, were broadly supported, though some residents expressed concerns about pests, invasive species, and the long-term maintenance requirements of naturalized landscapes.
Environmental concerns featured prominently in responses. Residents expressed a high level of concern about sea level rise, flooding from both storms and groundwater rise, and the potential impacts of climate change on local biodiversity. Air quality and extreme heat were also identified as important issues. When asked about desired improvements, respondents prioritized expanded opportunities for walking and biking, more naturalized open spaces, and restoration of lagoon and shoreline habitats. The lagoon was viewed as both a recreational and community gathering space, valued for its boating and birdwatching opportunities as well as its role as an aesthetic and social focal point. These insights provided clear direction that both comfort amenities and ecological resilience should be central to policy development.
2.2 Pop-Up Events
Two pop-up events were held at the Off the Grid food truck event and Foster City Farmer’s Market to engage residents who might not otherwise attend formal meetings. The purpose of the pop-ups was to build awareness of the Element updates, introduce draft ideas, and invite casual, hands-on participation in shaping policy directions.
Each event featured three activities designed to spark dialogue and collect meaningful input.
The “What Did We Miss?” wall allowed participants to add sticky notes highlighting issues or opportunities they felt had been overlooked, resulting in comments that reinforced the need for shoreline restoration, expanded shade in parks, and continued attention to lagoon water quality.
A “Vision Wall” invited residents to describe their aspirations for Foster City’s future parks and open spaces. The responses created a collage of community visions centered on resilient natural areas, inclusive and family-friendly parks, and a stronger sense of connection to the lagoon and bayfront. Finally, a “Spin-the-Wheel” activity engaged participants of all ages in conversations about topics such as water conservation, local wildlife, and climate resilience, while also drawing attention to the range of strategies the City is considering.
More than 800 community members were reached through the pop-up events held for both the General Plan Updates and Parks Master Plan. The casual and interactive setting encouraged participation from families and residents who might not have engaged in a more traditional workshop, broadening the diversity of voices that informed the planning process.
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 3
Feedback at the pop-ups consistently highlighted Leo J. Ryan Park as the community’s most valued and popular park, particularly for its waterfront access and role as a hub for events.
When asked what they would like to see more of, participants identified splash pads, expanded beach access, and additional trees and shaded areas as top priorities. Residents also voiced appreciation for the City’s existing parks, noting the cleanliness, sports facilities, and community events like the Fourth of July celebration as strengths. In terms of future vision, community members emphasized the need for new amenities, maintenance improvements, and more programming opportunities. Many expressed a desire for spaces that better support family- friendly recreation and opportunities for cultural and outdoor events. Across multiple pop-ups, participants also identified the need for improved restroom availability, especially in high-use parks and during large events.
Finally, while there was strong support for natural resource stewardship and rewilding concepts, some residents raised concerns about the potential for rewilding to attract additional Canada geese, which already create maintenance and usability challenges in waterfront parks.
Participants asked how the City might mitigate these impacts while still pursuing habitat restoration goals. This feedback underscores both enthusiasm for ecological improvements and the importance of balancing them with practical management strategies.
2.3 Joint Workshop
The joint workshop served as a central forum for presenting findings from the Parks Master Plan process and sharing draft concepts for the General Plan Element updates. The workshop was designed both to educate participants about the purpose of the updates and to collect detailed feedback on draft policies and design ideas.
The session began with an overview of existing conditions, followed by presentations of draft park design concepts and policy themes. Participants were then invited to engage directly with large-format boards displaying proposed improvements. Feedback from the workshop highlighted a desire for improved shade and seating, upgraded play areas, and more accessible trail connections. Residents also raised concerns about lagoon cleanliness and the impacts of geese on the usability of parks, reinforcing issues previously noted in the Community Priorities Survey, included as Attachment A to this report.
Regarding conservation topics, participants strongly supported habitat restoration, shoreline resilience, and educational opportunities related to environmental stewardship. Many emphasized the importance of incorporating nature-based solutions, such as living shorelines, into future flood protection projects. The workshop drew forty-six attendees, and the discussions underscored a recurring theme across engagement activities: residents want a balance between recreational opportunities and the protection of natural systems.
2.4 Focus Groups
2.4.1 Community Organizations Focus Group
The community organizations focus group was held on August 11, 2025, and brought together representatives from local groups that serve a variety of community needs. representatives from local groups serving a variety of recreational and community needs. Attendees included representatives from the Foster City Little League, Peninsula Youth Soccer Club, Peninsula Youth Bocce, the Rotary Club, and residents active in the City’s Sustainability Committee and bicycling community.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
4 The purpose of the focus group was to explore how updated policies could better address equity, access, and programming considerations within the parks and open space system.
Discussion was structured around a series of open-ended questions designed to draw on local knowledge and lived experience. Participants were asked whether the draft policies adequately addressed park accessibility disparities; what improvements and amenities should be prioritized; how well the Elements support inclusive, multigenerational programming; what types of indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities are most needed; whether the policies were strong enough to protect scenic, cultural, and tribal resources; and what role community groups might play in co-stewarding parks and open spaces.
Feedback emphasized the importance of equitable access to safe, well-maintained, and welcoming parks. Lighting was raised repeatedly as a concern for both sports groups and casual users, particularly at Sea Cloud and Catamaran Parks. Shade and seating were also identified as needs, especially for seniors and families. Specific requests included fences around bocce courts, improved goose management, more recycling receptacles, and expanded access to electricity in parks to support community events. Programming was discussed as being just as important as physical improvements, with calls for expanded indoor facilities for basketball, volleyball, and table tennis, and a general community space similar to the San Bruno recreation center. Attendees also expressed interest in playing a more active role in volunteer cleanups, stewardship, and programming, underscoring a strong commitment to civic pride and partnership.
2.4.2 Regional and Technical Non-Governmental Organizations Focus Group
The second focus group was held on August 13, 2025, and convened representatives from regional conservation organizations and technical experts, including the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter and Sustainable San Mateo County.
The discussion centered on opportunities for policy alignment and technical input on issues such as habitat connectivity, invasive species management, and coastal resilience. Questions posed to the group covered a range of themes: whether certain ecological areas or species within Foster City warrant greater policy attention; opportunities to enhance biodiversity and integrate habitat into park design; models for rewilding and approaches to implementing SB 1425 and AB 1889 requirements; strategies for managing invasive species, particularly geese; whether draft policies adequately address stormwater quality, shoreline resilience, and sea level rise; and how Foster City can better align its efforts with regional conservation and data-sharing platforms.
Participants urged the City to take an ambitious approach to rewilding, restoration, and biodiversity protection, referencing state legislation such as SB 1425 and AB 1889. They pointed to nature-based shoreline protection as the most durable and ecologically beneficial strategy for a low-lying, waterfront community like Foster City. Invasive species management was highlighted as an ongoing challenge, with a call for collaborative programs that balance habitat protection with community expectations. The group emphasized that Foster City should strengthen partnerships with regional conservation entities and participate in shared data platforms to improve monitoring, implementation, and accountability.
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 5
2.5 Senate Bill (SB) 18 Tribal Consultation Results
In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 18, the City of Foster City has consulted with California Native American tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with the planning area. The purpose of this consultation is to provide tribes an opportunity to engage in government-to- government dialogue with the City, to identify potential impacts on cultural resources, and to ensure that tribal perspectives are considered in the development of the Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements. This process recognizes the importance of tribal cultural resources and traditional knowledge in land use planning.
The SB 18 tribal consultation period was held from June 9 through August 13, 2025. During this period, the City of Foster City contacted nine tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the planning area. No requests for formal consultation were received. As a result, no additional revisions to the Parks and Open Space or Conservation Elements were required based on tribal input.
2.6 Public Comment Period
The draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements were made available for public review from August 8, 2025 through September 2, 2025. During this period, community members, local organizations, and other stakeholders had the opportunity to provide written comments and participate in public meetings held with the Planning Commission and City Council to share their perspectives on the proposed policies and strategies.
During the public comment period, community members provided a range of feedback on the draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Many comments focused on the condition and usability of existing park facilities. For example, residents noted issues with the design and accessibility of play equipment, raising concerns that swings and other structures were not appropriate for all ages. Suggestions were made to modify equipment to better accommodate children, parents, and caregivers, with an emphasis on safety and inclusivity.
Another recurring theme was the need to address lagoon- and shoreline-related challenges, particularly goose management and water quality. Commenters expressed that geese droppings significantly affect the cleanliness and comfort of waterfront parks, reinforcing the importance of continued habitat management strategies identified in the Elements. In addition, commenters called for expanded shade, seating, and restrooms to make parks more comfortable for daily use, especially for seniors and families.
Overall, the public comments were supportive of the direction outlined in the draft Elements, while offering specific, on-the-ground feedback about how proposed policies can translate into tangible improvements for everyday park experiences. These comments helped affirm key themes already identified through earlier engagement, such as comfort amenities, ecological health, and equitable access, while providing practical suggestions to guide implementation.
The comments and comment responses have been summarized in Table 1.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
6 Table 1 Public Comments
Commenter
Name Date Received Comment Summary Comment Response Page Number Public Comments
Nilofer
Motiwala August 14, 2025
The commenter states that they
would like to see all bathrooms
stocked with female sanitary
products.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
The commenter asks that cleanup
kits, especially the goose-poop kit,
be available on-site (not checked
out) to encourage use during
practices and activities.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
The commenter requests more
water-refill stations and modern
bottle-fill fountains across parks.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Evan Adams August 18, 2025
The commenter states that the
Lagoon is described as both a
major recreational and ecological
water body, which seems
inconsistent, and suggests
clarifying whether it is primarily
recreational or ecological.
The requested edits have been
incorporated.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 The commenter suggests noting
that the lagoon is approximately
213 acres in size to help in
planning, and recommends
referencing surface area as well as
ecological function.
The requested information
regarding the volume of water
held by the lagoon has been
added.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 7
The commenter requests that the
City correct the term “Canadian
geese” to “Canada geese,” and
clarify that avian DNA, rather than
Canada goose DNA alone, has
been identified as impacting water
quality.
“Canadian geese” has been
corrected to “Canada geese” and
the statement regarding poor
lagoon water quality has been
corrected to more accurately
represent the cause of poor water
quality.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
7 The commenter suggests
specifying playgrounds by age
range, citing San Mateo and
Burlingame as examples, and
recommends including age-specific
playground types as available in
the Parks Master Plan.
The requested information is not
available at this time but comment
has been passed on to the Parks
and Recreation Department for
further review.
The commenter states that Foster
City has annexed Bay Trail land
and provides a link to the City’s
land use and zoning map. The
commenter notes that discussion of
privately owned property (APN
096-012-180) on Beach Park Blvd.
appears to be a zoning issue,
which is outside the scope of the
Parks Master Plan.
This comment has been noted.
Zoning is not within the scope of
this project.
The commenter states that there is
an existing volleyball court at
Boothbay Park and requests that
additional volleyball courts needed
in the future should be identified as
such.
The Element states that the City
would need to add one additional
volleyball court, accounting for the
existing court available at
Boothbay Park.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
8 The commenter states that adding
further shade trees will contribute
to mitigating the Canada goose
population which could have
cascading positive impacts on
water quality. The commenter
notes the low prevalence of geese
at parks with greater volumes of
trees.
The comment has been noted.
Please refer to the Parks Master
Plan for additional information on
park design. Additionally,
Implementation Program POS-c
supports additional tree plantings
in parks.
The commenter asks whether the
golf course could be legally
converted to a park.
The comment has been noted for
City consideration.
The commenter suggests that
references to staffing standards
should be footnoted or rephrased
as best practice benchmarks rather
than City facilities, as using them in
the plan may be misleading.
Please refer to the Parks Master
Plan for more detail on park
staffing and maintenance.
The commenter asks whether
FEMA and NOAA map data used in
the document are the most up-to-
date, and suggests ensuring
correct and current sources.
The maps provided in the Parks
and Open Space Assessment
and Parks and Open Space
Element utilize data that is
currently available. Localized data
reflecting the upgraded levee is
not available at this time.
The commenter asks that the City
reference the data set used to
ensure it is current and state the
range. The commenter suggests
that the flood inundation map is
inaccurate for San Mateo County.
The maps provided in the Parks
and Open Space Assessment
and Parks and Open Space
Element utilize data that is
currently available. Localized data
reflecting the upgraded levee is
not available at this time.
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 9
Andreia
Colombo August 25, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Tatiana Gotze August 25, 2025
The commenter states that the
swing structures at Turnstone Park
are not designed at appropriate
heights. They note the adult swings
are too high due to short chains,
and the green swing chair for an
adult and child is also too high,
preventing safe use. The
commenter suggests adding longer
chains to resolve these issues,
recommends adding an infant
swing (acknowledging it may
require removing another swing),
and observes that the current setup
is underutilized and potentially
unsafe, citing an example of a
parent pushing a baby in the green
swing instead of sitting with the
child.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Raissa Villea August 26, 2025
The commenter requests to
reserve one of the beach courts for
beach tennis on certain days of the
week.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Isadora Castro
Lemos August 26, 2025
The commenter proposes that the
City support beach tennis activities
by allowing existing sand courts to
be used for beach tennis during
certain time slots.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
10 Tais Perpetuo August 26, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Sandra
Oliveira August 26, 2025
The commenter requests City
support in making Boothbay Park’s
courts more accessible and
inclusive for the community.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Cintia
Fernandes August 26, 2025
The commenter requests the City
to support the community of beach
tennis players by allowing players
to utilize the sand courts at set
times during each week.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Dave Rozzi August 28, 2025
The commenter asks if a
community pool is being
considered.
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Audrey
Silverman August 30, 2025
The commenter states that the
swing structures at Turnstone Park
are not designed at appropriate
heights. They note the adult swings
are too high due to short chains,
and the green swing chair for an
adult and child is also too high,
preventing safe use. The
commenter suggests adding longer
chains to resolve these issues,
recommends adding an infant
swing (acknowledging it may
require removing another swing),
and observes that the current setup
is underutilized and potentially
unsafe, citing an example of a
The request has been noted and
passed on to the Parks and
Recreation Department for further
review.
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 11
parent pushing a baby in the green
swing instead of sitting with the
child.
Evan Adams September 5,
2025
The commenter submitted an
external comment received by the
City Council which included a 3D
model of recommended
improvements to Edgewater Park.
The original model and submission
were made by Yiming Luo. Luo
submits several questions
regarding the Parks Master Plan.
The comment has been noted
and has been passed to the
Parks and Recreation Department
and Parks Master Plan consultant
team for further review.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
12 Focus Group Comments
Foster City
Little League,
Bocce Ball
community,
Cycling
community,
Peninsula
Youth Soccer,
CSAC, Rotary,
Boating
community
August 11, 2025
• Need to consider boat
access to land around
Foster City - access to
parks, shopping,
restaurants. Foster City has
a lot of boaters who like to
park their boats to access
community amenities.
• Parks are generally
accessible to those who
want to use them.
• We need better lighting in
most of the parks to make
them safer at night.
• Need better lighting at
Catamaran so that youth
can play soccer in the
evening during the winter.
• Improved shade structures
are needed at Booth Bay
Park, Catamaran Park.
• Gate at Catamaran Park
can be problematic - needs
replacing or a section that
opens or both. It is good for
helping to deter the geese
but if a ball goes over the
fence it's tough to retrieve it.
Also, geese have gotten
"stuck" on the park side of
the fence ; having a section
that opens would be helpful.
• Bocce Ball courts need
more fencing and benches
as well as shading.
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 13
• Outdoor electricity can be a
problem for outdoor events.
Need outdoor service and
ability to plug in multiple
appliances (such as
coffeemakers).
• There is a lack of indoor
recreation facilities in FC.
The ones that exist require
too much coordination.
Would like space for indoor
basketball, volleyball,
events.
• Goose poop is a problem
getting to the track
(Catamaran); a pathway
could help to avoid stepping
on goose poop.
• Groups will be happy to
help with educational
events (Peninsula Youth
Soccer).
• Peninsula Youth Soccer
provides incentives to their
coaches to get to the fields
early to clean up goose
poop.
• Could the City build indoor
space (other than the Rec
Center) at one of the parks?
• If steps down to the water
are still being considered for
the amphitheater location,
please be sure to consider
safety, liability, especially
during amphitheater events.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
14 Susan Lessin,
Sierra Club
Loma Prieta
Chapter and
Mollie Carter,
Sustainable
San Mateo
County.
August 13, 2025
• The reports were well done.
Maps were helpful. The
following issues and areas
of interest were raised by
attendees:
• Tree canopy - Foster City
has one of the lowest tree
canopy percentages in the
region; adding details on
natural plants and drought
resistant plants would be
helpful for this section. San
Mateo has a Green Streets
program that might be worth
reviewing.
• Coastal Flooding - Foster
City has the highest risk of
coastal flooding in San
Mateo County.
• Air Quality - FC is on the
high end of the spectrum
with a score of 2.5 for
particulate matter.
• EV Charging - need more
focus on multi-family and
public charging access; the
County as a whole is
lacking in access.
Sustainable SMC wants to
support FC's efforts to add
more charging
opportunities. Could the
City offer incentives for
installation of multifamily
charging stations?
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 15
• Didn't see electrification of
municipal buildings in the
draft element. Della
explained that much of this
is covered in the CAP.
• OneShoreline is the most
important entity with respect
to addressing sea level rise;
there may be concepts in
their Ideas Bank that could
be applied. Also,
OneShoreline could be
helpful with a range of other
issues associated with sea
level rise in addition to
levees.
• Geese management - didn't
see the plan referenced.
• Last mile, electrification,
EVs, EV chargers were all
mentioned in the CAP. It
might be helpful to include a
bit more on these issues in
the Element.
• Vertical levees vs.
horizontal levees: vertical
levees lead to rising
groundwater, subsidence.
• Bird boxes - has FC
considered them?
• Water Qualify - The Sierra
Club is hoping that data on
water quality will be
included in quarterly reports
on geese management. E-
coli is an issue that needs
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
16 to be addressed because it
limits access to the water.
• Goose feces - The Sierra
Club would like to see a
more aggressive plan for
picking up goose feces and
is concerned that spraying
feces with water will have a
negative effect on water
quality.
• Sea level rise - The Sierra
Club is supportive of a
regional approach
(mentioned by
Councilmembers Kiesel and
Sullivan).
• Regional approach to
issues - there is a need for
coordinating with other
jurisdictions, such as
Belmont, Redwood City,
and San Mateo regarding
geese; there might be
additional opportunities for
cross-collaboration through
county committees and
groups such as CCAG and
for transportation.
Attendees acknowledged
that FC has limitations due
to not being on a Caltrain
line. Is there additional
funding through CCAG for
shuttles? Is there any
additional talk of a ferry line
from Foster City? Last mile
Engagement Activity Results
Engagement Results Summary 17
issue comes into play. The
Sierra Club is against
hovercrafts due to the
pollution they cause.
• Rewilding - balancing act
for built out environments.
Coyotes create problems
for walkers as well as the
geese. The coyotes are
very used to people and
don't run off. There is good
signage about coyotes in
Foster City; used to have
signs regarding feral cats.
• Bicycle paths - Most paths
are on streets; designated
pathways for bicycles would
be helpful - see San
Mateo's Green Streets
program and Menlo Park.
Other questions
• Recreation Center - is it
going to be solar-powered?
The Sierra Club
recommends no gas and
solar powering of the
building. They asked if we
could explore getting a
grant from Peninsula Clean
Energy to get on a micro-
grid so Foster City's Rec
Center is not dependent on
PG&E in the event of an
outage since the facility will
likely be used for an
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
18 emergency center/shelter in
an emergency. Noted that
Burlingame's new
community center used the
same architect as the Rec
Center. The Burlingame
center is a very good
model.
• How often is water quality
tested?
Other issues raised
• The pictures included for
the new community center
include people engaging
with and accessing the
water. Ties into water
quality testing and plans.
• The Sierra Club's CAP
committee sent a letter to
FC regarding the CAP.
Conclusion
Engagement Results Summary 19
3 Conclusion
Taken together, the survey, pop-up events, workshop, and focus groups created a robust picture of Foster City’s community priorities. Residents consistently emphasized the dual importance of enhancing everyday park experiences through shade, seating, lighting, and play spaces, while also addressing larger environmental challenges related to habitat restoration, shoreline resilience, and climate change. Regional experts and local organizations reinforced these themes and added perspectives on equity, collaboration, and technical approaches to conservation.
This input has been instrumental in shaping the draft Parks and Open Space and Conservation Elements, ensuring that they reflect both community aspirations and regional best practices.
The forthcoming tribal consultation and public comment period will provide additional layers of review and dialogue, continuing the collaborative process that is central to this update.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
20 This page intentionally left blank.
Appendix A
Community Priorities Survey Results
Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-1
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
A-2
Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-3
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
A-4
Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-5
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
A-6
Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-7
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
A-8
Community Priorities Survey Results
Engagement Results Summary A-9
Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Engagement Results Summary
Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Vice Chair
Stoveland August 14, 2025
Raised concerns about ensuring
the Parks and Open Space
Element does not conflict too
strongly with the Housing Element.
He referenced POS-F under the
Implementation Program, which
states that as Foster City grows,
the City will strive to maintain its
existing park acreage level of
service (LOS) of 3.2 acres per
thousand residents. He provided
that the surrounding cities have an
LOS of 2.8 acres, and in order to
experience the expected growth
between now and 2040, an
additional 12.9 acres of park space
would need to be included in order
to maintain the 3.2 LOS. He
suggested either remaining at the
current acreage or slightly below to
ensure that the city has room for
the Housing Element obligations.
The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.
Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Asked if the acreage requirement
should be defined now. He
referenced that the City is moving
towards more objective standards
and having this dissonance could
create unnecessary challenges for
potential developers.
The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.
Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Asked about the calculation behind
12.9 acres if the population is
expected to go up by 2040. He
suggested setting the goal at the
current acres per thousand
residents. He recommended
against setting it at 2.8 and
cautioned that 3.2 might not be
sustainable.
Language around park LOS has
been updated in the Element to
maintain existing acreage and
consider the appropriate metric at
a future time.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Stated that his preferred approach
is to define the numbers to reach
the RHNA goals while still meeting
the needs of the community.
The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.
Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 Referenced page 34, which stated
that there is a lack of a formal
management plan related to the
maintenance of the parks and
referenced page 43, which speaks
of high-quality maintenance, a
funding strategy, and plan
engagement proactively. He asked
how the realization came about that
there is no formal maintenance
plan for the parks.
Question was answered in
meeting. Additionally, the Parks
and Open Space Element points
to the Parks Master Plan as the
vehicle for further addressing
maintenance strategies and
acknowledges ongoing efforts to
improve maintenance planning.
Commissioner
Jagtiani August 14, 2025
Asked if the levee is counted
towards the 3.2 LOS
The Parks and Open Space
Element LOS calculation is based
on City-owned parks and does
not currently include the levee
system.
Joint Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Committee Comments Engagement Results Summary
Suggested including how much
acreage that private parks, such as
HOAs, amounts to
This comment was noted and
referred to the Parks and
Recreation Department and Parks
Master Plan consultant team.
Private facilities are not included
in the LOS calculation for the
General Plan, but their role in
overall recreation opportunities is
acknowledged.
Chair Pedro August 14, 2025
Clarified whether the option to
include the active levee space
would be the City’s to make. He
furthered that it would be a benefit
to include those spaces in the ratio.
Determination of whether to count
levee space toward LOS will
require further policy direction
from the City Council and
coordination with regional
agencies.
Asked if the lagoon acres were
included in the park space acreage.
He noted that the report states that
there are 133 acres of parks and
218 acres of lagoon.
The Parks and Open Space
Element clarifies that lagoon
acreage is not included in the
park LOS but is addressed
separately as a unique
recreational and ecological
resource.
Suggested that there be looser
language used in the elements. He
also asked if the dredging refers to
the dumping of what has been
dredged.
Language was adjusted for
flexibility to avoid prescriptive
standards. References to
dredging were clarified to ensure
accuracy of terminology regarding
sediment removal and
management.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 Committee
Chair Tiwari August 14, 2025
Asked if they are looking to adopt a
formal and measurable standard.
The Parks and Open Space
Element clarifies that measurable
standards may be established
through future planning
processes.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
34 (see
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Program POS-
g)
Asked what the process would be
for defining the objective numbers
for acreage.
Future opportunities, such as
Parks Master Plan updates,
budget decisions, and Council
direction, will be the vehicles for
defining objective standards.
Asked if there is a balance between
supporting rewilding while
addressing concerns about pests,
usability, and upkeep.
Policies and programs included in
the Parks and Open Space
Element highlight both the
ecological benefits of rewilding
and the need to manage
maintenance, pests, and usability.
Implementation programs support
adaptive management strategies
to strike this balance.
Committee
Me
mber Ryzak August 14, 2025
Stated that the attractiveness of the
parks should be discussed
alongside the technical
components of the element.
Narrative language was added to
emphasize that parks provide
both technical functions (e.g.,
flood protection, habitat value)
and community benefits such as
beauty, identity, and quality of life.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
6 and 21
C
ity Council Comments
Engagement Results Summary
City Council Comments
Councilmember
Venkat September 2, 2025
Referred to the issue raised by
Planning Commissioner Stoveland
regarding the LOS requirement of
3.2 acres per thousand residents,
or 12.9 additional acres are needed
by 2040. Will this requirement
interfere with housing
development?
The Parks and Open Space
Element was adjusted to maintain
existing parkland and evaluate
potential LOS in the future.
Language was adjusted to avoid
potential conflict with Housing
Element objectives, emphasizing
balance and flexibility.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
13 and Page 34
Had questions regarding artificial
turf.
Evaluation of turf options will be
considered in future facility
planning and Parks Master Plan
discussions, not within the scope
of the General Plan Elements.
Liked the inclusion of the climate
resilience goals and nature-based
strategies and other community
health benefits as the population
continues to age.
Appreciation noted. The Elements
retain and strengthen climate
resilience goals, nature-based
strategies, and health co-benefits.
Would like to prioritize a citywide
tree inventory and mentioned that
San Mateo has one, or potentially
hiring an arborist. Supports these
efforts.
The request is acknowledged.
Tree canopy expansion and
monitoring are supported through
Element policies, and a citywide
inventory is identified as a
potential implementation tool.
Councilmember
Sullivan September 2, 2025
Raised concerns about Sea Cloud
II regarding dredging material
placement if Sea Cloud II is used
for other parks and open space
uses as Sea Cloud II has been
used in the past for placement of
dredging material.
The City will evaluate the site as
an option if future dredge sites
are needed and Council will
determine path forward. This
effort is outside the scope of the
Elements but will inform future
planning.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Raised the issue of sediment
management as a way to reduce
dredging requirements. Suggested
filtering Bay water to reduce
sediment.
While the Elements do not
prescribe specific filtration
technologies, sediment and
dredging concerns are captured
under policies addressing lagoon
health and long-term water
quality.
Expressed that the major concern
is the environment and the
waterways. Does not want to
overlook the major environmental
issues – dredging, lagoons, water
quality.
The Elements include policies to
protect waterways, address
dredging, and improve lagoon
water quality. Broader concerns
are acknowledged and will guide
future implementation and
coordination with regional
agencies.
Councilmember
Niederhofer September 2, 2025
Noted missing elements from some
of the entries in the parks inventory
(Table 1) and requested Parks &
Rec review the table before
finalizing the report.
WRT reviewed and refined Table
1 for accuracy. Table 1 in the
Parks and Open Space Element
has been updated to better reflect
the major facilities at each park.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
8-9
Recommended revising strong
wording in policies (e.g., “ensure”)
to lighter alternatives like
“promote”, “create”, or “aspire to.”
Strong prescriptive wording was
revised to alternatives such as
“promote” or “support,” consistent
with the Council’s direction.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Pages
31-36
Vice Mayor
Kiesel September 2, 2025
Noted that the level of detail was
sufficient and would be awaiting the
final Elements.
Comment acknowledged. Staff
will finalize the Elements with the
level of detail deemed sufficient
by Council.
C
ity Council Comments
Engagement Results Summary
Mayor Jimenez September 2, 2025
Found implementation programs
starting on Page 46 a bit vague.
Requested an explanation on how
the programs came into play.
Rincon explained that the elements
are 20–30-year documents and
that the goal is to make them
specific enough to create a work
plan and open enough to account
for changes that happen over the
next decade or so. Director
Mangalam also explained that the
tasks will be reported to the State
every year and that the programs
were discussed in detail with the
departments. Mayor Jimenz
requested clarification on
definitions of long-term, mid-term,
and short-term to be added to the
Elements. Mayor Jimenez would
like to see some of the long-term
goals done sooner.
Director Mangalam explained that
there is flexibility within the
timeframes. A footnote was
added to the implementation
tables in both Elements defining
short-term as 1-5 years, mid-term
as 6-10 years, and long-term as
10+ years.
Parks and
Open Space
Element, Page
36 Inquired as to whether other cities’
experiences were considered in the
drafting of the Elements.
Experiences from nearby cities
and regional entities such as
OneShoreline and San Mateo
County have been incorporated
into policy development.
Stressed that the document should
turn into an active strategic plan,
with clear goals and clear policies,
not a shelf document.
The Elements highlight their role
as active strategic documents,
with clear policies, timelines for
implementation, and ongoing
reporting requirements.
City of Foster City
Parks and Open Space Element and Conservation Element
Highlighted need for more tree
cover working within the budget
that we have.
The Elements emphasize tree
canopy expansion and shade
improvements, recognizing fiscal
realities and aligning goals with
budget priorities.
Asked if we would be looking at
sites such as the golf course and
Sea Cloud II. Director Mangalam
emphasized that future studies
would be brought to City Council
through a study session.
The Elements do not designate
future land use for these sites, but
staff confirmed that such
decisions will be evaluated in
dedicated studies brought to
Council.
Asked about coordination with San
Mateo and Redwood Shores.
Regional coordination is
incorporated into policies,
ensuring alignment with adjacent
jurisdictions and regional
agencies.