Agenda — Fountain Valley City Council, August 15, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 1 August 15, 2023 AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE FOUNTAIN

VALLEY AGENCY

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/

FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Closed Session 4:00 p.m.

Study Session 5:30 p.m.

Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Tuesday, August 15, 2023
Council Chambers
10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
http://www.fountainvalley.org
MEETING ASSISTANCE: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, anyone needing special assistance to participate in a meeting of the government bodies listed herein should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 593-4445. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting allows the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting.

AGENDA COMMUNICATIONS: All revised or additional documents and writings related to an item on this agenda provided to all or a majority of the government body members after distribution of the agenda packet, are available for public inspection (1) in the City Clerk’s Office at 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 during normal business hours; and (2) in the Council Chambers at the time of the meeting. Unless directed otherwise by a government body listed herein all actions shall be based on/memorialized by the latest document submitted as a late communication.

PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS: Persons wishing to address th e Cit y Counc il or othe r government body listed complete a speaker card and give it to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period. Requests to speak will not be accepted after the public comment session begins without permission of the Mayor/Chair. Speakers must limit remarks to a total of (3) three minutes and address the City Council through the Mayor. Comments to individuals or staff are not permitted. Scheduled Matters, including Public Hearings: Indicate on the card what item you want to address. Unscheduled Matters: Indicate on the card what subject matter you want to address. Comments must be related to issues that are within the jurisdiction of the governing body listed on the agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the governing body may not enter into discussion regarding items not on the agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the governing bodies listed herein to be routine and will be enacted on simultaneously with one motion without discussion unless separate action and/or discussion is requested by a governing body member, staff, or a member of the public.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: Persons wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to a proposal are given an opportunity to do so during the public hearing. Those wishing to address a governing body during the hearing are requested to complete the speaker card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing. If a proposed action is challenged in court, there may be a limitation to raising only those issues raised during the hearing or in written correspondence received by the governing body at or before the hearing.

Note: The Fountain Valley City Council serves as the Successor Agency to the Fountain Valley Agency for Community Development (Successor Agency), the Fountain Valley Housing Authority, and the Fountain Valley Finance Authority. The Actions of the Successor Agency are separate and apart from the actions of the City Council.

ZOOM LINK INFORMATION
• Participants that choose to watch the City Council meeting through zoom are automatically placed in the waiting room and will then be admitted into the meeting. In order to make a public comment, you will indicate through the chat feature which item you would like to speak on, or click on the “raise hand” icon to let the administrator know you wish to speak.
• All participants are muted unless you are requesting to speak, at which time you will be allowed to unmute and make you comment.
• All public comments are allowed up to 3 minutes to speak.

Topic: City Council Meeting
Time: Aug 15, 2023 06:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85392611448?pwd=TGhuS1JnR21ud2N1M0cySEViVXRQZz09 Meeting ID: 853 9261 1448
Passcode: 385126

CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 4:00 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Closed Session matters only)
Persons wishing to speak on a Closed Session matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period.

1. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES
Consultation with: Scott Kim, IT Director

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9:
1 Potential case - facts and circumstances known: Gov Claims Act claim received from American Guard Services.

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9
Name of case: SOCAL RECOVERY LLC V. CITY OF COSTA MESA, 56 4TH 802 (9TH (Cir. 2023). Consider joining amicus brief in support of City of Costa Mesa

4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6.

Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager, Maggie Le, Finance Director, Ryan Smith, Human Resources Director, Carrie Hanes, Community Development Director / Deputy City Manager, Omar Dadabhoy, Attorney for the City, Colin Burns Employee Organizations: Police Officers' Association (POA), Police Officers' Management Unit (POMU), Fire Association (FVFA), Fountain Valley Municipal Employees Association (Field Services unit), Fountain Valley General Employees Association (FVGEA), Fountain Valley Professional and Technical Employees (P&T), Individually Represented Battalion Chiefs and Individually Represented P&T (IRP&T)

STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 5:30 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Study Session matters only)
Persons wishing to speak on a Study Session matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period.

1. Presentation on Street Vendors / Peddlers – Presentation by Matt Sheppard, Police Chief and Ryan Smith, Finance Director

OPEN SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 p.m.

INVOCATION
SALUTE TO THE FLAG Council Member Patrick Harper

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY/ ROLL CALL Council Members: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Grandis, Mayor/Chair Constantine

ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS

CITY MANAGER / MAYOR UPDATE

PRESENTATIONS

1. ACC-OC Presentation by Kris Murray

2. Presentation on the City Website Launch – Presentation by Meghan Wishner, Management Analyst

FIRST CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
The Unscheduled Matters Public Comments portion will last 15 Minutes at the beginning of the meeting. Any requests to speak on unscheduled matters after the initial 15 minutes, will be heard at the end of the meeting, unless the Mayor approves an extension of this time. If an individual speaks during the First unscheduled matters time period, they do not get to speak at the end of the meeting as well. Persons wishing to speak on an unscheduled matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker and to give the card to the City Clerk. Each person will have up to 3 minutes to speak. The City Clerk will call upon those that wish to speak.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
(Scheduled Matters Only)
Persons wishing to speak on Agenda item(s) are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker card indicating the item they want to address and to give the card to the City Clerk prior to the public comment period. Each person will be given up to 3 minutes to speak on the entire Consent Calendar, 3 minutes to speak on each item pulled from the consent calendar, and 3 minutes to speak on any agendized item(s) not appearing on the Consent Calendar.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar Items 1 – 13 will be approved simultaneously with one motion, unless separate action/or discussion is requested.

1. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only.

2. Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the July 18, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting

Page 6 ends

Recommended Action: Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the July 18, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting

3. Approve the Register of Demands for the period of 7/8/2023 to 8/4/2023. Page 17 Recommended Action: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 to approve the attached Register of Demands representing payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 7/8/2023 and 8/4/2023 for a total of $13,275,975.60.

4. Approve a Contract Amendment with Dr. Lawrence Richman Page 40 Recommended Action: Staff is recommending that council approve the contract amendment increase to Dr. Richman’s contract in the amount of $5,488.86

5. Amendment No. 2 to CON 21-33 with Charles Abbott Associate for as-needed plan review services Page 42
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1.

6. City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Adoption for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023 Page 83
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1 to adopt the vision and mission statements, six-month strategic objectives matrix for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023.

7. Purchase 2 Chevy Trailblazers for PD Investigations Page 89 Recommended Action: Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 to 1) waive the bidding requirements pursuant to FVMC 2.36.070 Par 4 and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs for $64,728.55 through the existing cooperative contract with Sourcewell; and 2) authorize staff to dispose of the existing vehicles by means that best meet the City’s needs.

8. Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities Page 104
Recommended Action: Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 to approve Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities to extend the contract term two years and increase the annual contract amount by 3.22% in the first year and by an additional 3.25% in the second year of the extension.

9. Response to OC Grand Jury Report - Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains Page 116 Recommended Action: Staff is requesting the City Council to approve Alternative No. 1 or provide further direction to City staff.

10. Approval to Send a Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding the Grand Jury Report- Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange Page 184
Recommended Action: Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 Approve to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange.

11. Approval to Send a Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding the Grand Jury Report - SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?

Page 246 ends

Recommended Action: Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1: Approve to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report, SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

14. Approve and Agreement with Athens Administrators for Third Party Claims Administration Services Regarding Excess and Tail Workers Compensation Claims – Presentation by Rick Miller, City Clerk / Administrator Page 403
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1, Approve the tail claims services with Athens for the 2 years and 10 months agreement.

15. Adopt a Resolution Amending the Salary Schedule to Increase the Compensation of the City Manager – Presentation by Colin Burns, Attorney for the City Page 419 Recommended Action: Alternative No.1: Approve the resolution amending the City’s salary schedule to increase the City Manager’s base salary as shown on the attached resolution.

COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
Persons wishing to speak on an unscheduled matter are requested to identify themselves by completing a blue speaker and to give the card to the City Clerk. Each person will have up to 3 minutes to speak. The City Clerk will call upon those that wish to speak.

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY AB 1234/GENERAL COMMENTS

ADJOURN THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR

AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY
The next Regular Meeting of the Fountain Valley City Council is September 19, 2023 at 6:00 p.m., in the Fountain Valley Council Chambers, 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley.

12. Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding Group Homes/Sober Living Facilities

Page 315 ends

Recommended Action: Receive and file the Orange County Grand Jury’s investigative report, findings, and recommendations regarding Orange County Homelessness and authorize the Mayor to deliver the City’s response to the findings and recommendations to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

13. Amendment to Senior Transportation Contract with Cabco Page 364 Recommended Action: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, Approve the Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab contract amendment to increase fee to $17.50 per trip per passenger.

MINUTES OF THE

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FOUNTAIN

VALLEY AGENCY

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ FOUNTAIN VALLEY

HOUSING AUTHORITY
Closed Session 4:15 p.m.

Study Session 5:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Tuesday, July 18, 2023
Council Chambers

CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 5:00 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Closed Session matters only)
There were no public comments

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of case: Auster v. City of Fountain Valley OCSC Case No. 30-2020-01158809 By a 5-0 vote, the City Council approved the settlement.

2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
No reportable action

3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Mayor
Unrepresented employee: City Manager
No reportable action

STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 4:45 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (Study Session matters only)

1. Economic Development Action Plan – Presentation by Omar Dadabhoy & HDL Companies Staff and HDL company representatives presented an updated Economic Development Action plan for the City Council to consider.

Page 6 ends

2. California Yellow Cab Rate Increase – Presentation by Rob Frizzelle, Community Services Director
Community Services Director Rob Frizzelle provided an update on the increase request from California Yellow Cab as a cost of providing services to the residents of Fountain Valley.

3. Sober Living Homes Update – Presentation by Alexandra Halfman – Deputy City Attorney Public Comments: Suzzanah Holiday, Jeff Chang, Rosalia Escutia, David Nelson, Karen Nelson, Reg Holly, Patty Wisdom, Ben Nielsen
Deputy City Attorney Alexandra Halfman provided an update on Sober Living Homes and the processes to address issues that they present to the community.

OPEN SESSION
CALL TO ORDER 6:10 p.m.

INVOCATION Pastor Matthew Ford
SALUTE TO THE FLAG Council Member Ted Bui

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY/ ROLL CALL Council Members Present: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Grandis, Mayor/Chair Constantine

Council Members Absent: None

ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS
None

CITY MANAGER / MAYOR UPDATES
City Manager Maggie Le provided her update.

Mayor Kim Constantine provided her update.

PRESENTATIONS

1. Parks Make Life Better Proclamation – Presentation by Rob Frizzelle, Community Services Director
The Community Services Department presented information on city parks. Assemblyman Tri Ta presented a check to the Fountain Valley Community Foundation in the amount of $1 Million Dollars to be used for the recently approved Universally Accessible Playground. Mayor Kim Constantine presented a Proclamation proclaiming July as Parks make Life Better month.

Page 7 ends

2. League of California Cities Presentation – Presented by Connor Medina, Regional Public Affairs Manager, Orange County Division
Connor medina presented the benefits the city receives by being a member of the league of California Cities.

3. Presentation from Orange County Water District
Orange County Water District representatives presented an overall presentation on what the water district provides to the City of Fountain Valley.

FIRST CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
Nhung Ngo

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar Items 1 – 5; 7 - 9 were approved simultaneously. Item number 6 was pulled from the Consent Calendar and heard as a separate item under the Administrative Items portion of the agenda.

Page 8 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar Items 1 – 5 and 7 - 9 will be approved simultaneously with one motion, unless separate action/or discussion is requested.

1. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only.

ACTION: Move to Waive the reading in full of all ordinances under consideration and direct the Mayor to read by titles only.

MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

2. Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the June 20, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting ACTION: Move to Receive and File the Draft Minutes of the June 20, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting.

MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

3. Approved the Register of Demands for the period of 6/10/2023 to 7/7/2023 ACTION: Move to Approve the Register of Demands for the period of 6/10/2023 to 7/7/2023

Page 9 ends

MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

4. City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Adoption for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023
ACTION: Move to Approve the City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Adoption for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023
MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

5. Accept a Fee Proposal from AGA Engineers, Inc. not to exceed $50,000 for Citywide Traffic Signal Timing Monitoring for FY 2023-24 and Authorize Staff to Issue a Purchase Order to Encumber the On-Call Contract.

ACTION: Move to Accept a Fee Proposal from AGA Engineers, Inc. not to exceed $50,000 for Citywide Traffic Signal Timing Monitoring for FY 2023-24 and Authorize Staff to Issue a Purchase Order to Encumber the On-Call Contract.

MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

6. Pulled By Council Member Harper
Approve the Amendment No.1 with Falck Mobile Health Corp. for ambulance unit hour purchases and surge ambulance coverage, and the First Amendment with Wittman Enterprises, LLC for patient transportation billing services. Authorize the appropriation of $12,520
ACTION: Move to Approve the item and directed the budget amendment to be included at the mid-year budget
MOTION: Harper SECOND: Bui

Page 10 ends

AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

7. Request to Destroy Police Department Records
ACTION: Move to Approve the Request to Destroy Police Department Records MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

8. Review and Approve the Need to Continue Local Emergency Due to the 2023 Cal Rainstorms ACTION: Move to Approve the Need to Continue Local Emergency Due to the 2023 Cal Rainstorms
MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

9. Accept JIG Proposal for $20,820 for Demolition of Slater Inspection Manholes Engineering Design Services Mt Baldy & Euclid Waterline Replacement Proj & Authorize Staff to Encumber CON 1043 Direct Staff to Issue PO Change Order 00220151 for $20,820 ACTION: Move to Accept JIG Proposal for $20,820 for Demolition of Slater Inspection Manholes Engineering Design Services Mt Baldy & Euclid Waterline Replacement Proj & Authorize Staff to Encumber CON 1043 Direct Staff to Issue PO Change Order 00220151 for $20,820
MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Page 11 ends

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

10. Adoption of three resolutions pertaining to part-time classification and compensation plans and Master Salary Schedule
ACTION: Move to Adopt three resolutions pertaining to part-time classification and compensation plans and Master Salary Schedule
MOTION: Harper SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

11. Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate(s) for League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting in September 2023
ACTION: Move to Appoint Mayor Constantine as the Voting Delegate and Mayor Pro Tem Grandis as the Alternate Voting Delegate.

MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

12. Accept bids & award contract to Onyx Paving Company, Inc. for Residential Roadway Rehabilitation Project (Quadrant D1) for $1,919,000 Accept proposal & authorize staff to issue PO to Ninyo & Moore’s On-Call contract for Materials Testing for $6,925 ACTION: Move to Accept bids & award contract to Onyx Paving Company, Inc. for Residential Roadway Rehabilitation Project (Quadrant D1) for $1,919,000 Accept proposal & authorize staff to issue PO to Ninyo & Moore’s On-Call contract for Materials Testing for $6,925
MOTION: Grandis SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

13. Approve Amendment No. 3 to Michael Baker International CON 20-43 (Munis CON 1022) for

Page 12 ends

Twelve-Month Extension & Amount Not to Exceed $50,000 for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program Management Support Services for FY 2023-24 ACTION: Move to Approve Amendment No. 3 to Michael Baker International CON 20-43 (Munis CON 1022) for Twelve-Month Extension & Amount Not to Exceed $50,000 for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program Management Support Services for FY 2023-24
MOTION: Cunneen SECOND: Constantine
AYES: Bui, Cunneen, Harper, Grandis, Constantine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION
Mayor Constantine requested that the City Council look into the possibility of having a community picnic event around the 4th of July, with Fireworks and the opportunity to have it sponsored. There was no second.

CITY COUNCIL/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ PUBLIC COMMENTS (Unscheduled Matters Only)
None
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY AB 1234/GENERAL COMMENTS Council Member Bui
June 24 Attended grand opening / ribbon cutting for LA Furniture and the Rotary Club meeting
June 27 Attended the employee appreciation lunch and the 40th Anniversary of Theresa Sing as a Farmers insurance agent
July 4 Attended the Huntington Beach 4th of July Parade Council Member Cunneen
July 6 Attended the opening ceremonies for Concerts in the Park July 15 Attended the Grand Opening and ribbon cutting of Moiola Park July 18 Attended the quarterly meeting of OCTA’s Citizen Advisory Committee Mayor Pro Tem Grandis
June 21 Attended the PCTA Board meeting and Finamore Place Affordable Housing in Anaheim
June 22 Attended the Fountain Valley Regional Hospital Board meeting June 27 Attended the Employee Appreciation food truck event at the city yard and the Boys and Girls Club Executive Board Meeting
June 28 Attended the OC Sanitation District Executive Board Meeting

Page 13 ends

July 4 Attended the Huntington Beach 4th of July Parade July 6 Attended Sergeant Spangler’s retirement ceremony and the Concerts in the park opening night
July 7 Attended the FV regional Hospital Employee Service Awards July 9 Attended the Tip-A-Cop Fundraiser for Special Olympics July 12 Attended the OC Sanitation District Administration Board Meeting July 13 Attended FV Kiwanis Board Meeting, the FV Chamber Network at Night and the Concerts in the Park
Mayor Constantine
June 21 Participated in the PCTA (Public Cable Television Authority) Board Meeting in the City of Stanton Council Chambers.

June 22 Attended the FV Chamber of Commerce OC Connect Luncheon in which Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer was the speaker at Coastline College.

June 23 Stopped by the movie for senior citizens “Magic Mike” at Founders Village Community and Senior Center.

June 24 Participated in the grand opening / ribbon cutting for LA Furniture at 18319 Euclid. I welcomed this new business and presented them with a certificate on behalf of the City of Fountain Valley.

June 27 Watched the Orange County Board of Supervisors Meeting on the County’s website, then stopped in to the yard to visit and welcome City staff to the taco food truck. I later attended the FV Chamber of Commerce monthly Board Meeting at Coastline College, then watched the OC Mosquito and Vector Control New Member Orientation on Zoom. Later, I attended the Teri Simes Farmers Insurance 40th Anniversary Celebration at her business, attended the Green Valley monthly Board Meeting at the Green Valley Family Clubhouse, then the Huntington Valley Impact Republicans Meeting at Mimi’s Cafe.

June 28 Stopped by the Senior Expo prior to opening at Founders Village Community and Senior Center, then participated as a panel member in the Annual ABA-OC Biz Con “Ready, Set Grow” event (Asian Business Association Orange County Business Convention) at the Embassy Suites in Garden Grove. I received a plaque for participation.

June 29 Watched the PCTA (Public Cable Television Authority) SCAN NATOA Premiere of the 2023 Star Award Presentation on YouTube. PCTA is a finalist in category #18 - Instructional for our Cablecast Promotion. (SCAN NATOA stands for States of California and Nevada Chapter National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors), then I participated in the Warner bridge grand opening event there with City staff and OCTA.

July 1 Attended the Green Valley Vendor Fair and Movie in the Park at the Green Valley Park.

July 3 Pulled dotted books, packed and stored them for the upcoming July 15th “Buck a Bag Book Sale” at the Fountain Valley Friends of the Library - Fountain Valley Library.

July 6 Attended the senior citizens Independence Day Luncheon at Founders Village Community and Senior Center, then wished FVPD Sgt. Antonio’s Spangler well in his retirement at FV City Hall, and that evening welcomed the crowd to the first Concert in the Park for 2023 at the FV Sports Park.

Page 14 ends

July 9 Attended the Fountain Valley Police Department Tip-a-Cop for Special Olympics at Steady Kitchen and Taps. It was such a nice fundraiser with Fountain Valley Police Department and our Fire Department.

July 13 Attended the FV Chamber of Commerce Network at Night event at Sports Basement, then welcomed the happily large crowd to our 2nd Concert in the Park for 2023 at the FV Sports Park, and attended the FVRA (Fountain Valley Republican Assembly) Meeting at IHOP which featured Lisa Kassner’s presentation on “The Digital Trap”.

July 14 Stopped in to the Film Friday (“A Good Person”) for senior citizens at the FV Founders Village Community and Recreation Center, then stopped in to the Saigon Grand Center Indoor Expo at the Saigon Grand Center.

July 15 Stopped in at the Moiola Park Grand Opening / Ribbon Cutting event as iy was being set up. It’s our 20th park in Fountain Valley. I then attended the Saigon Grand Center Indoor Summer Expo Grand Opening and Ribbon Cutting event, gave a small speech there, participated in the FV Chamber of Commerce’s Ribbon Cutting event, and presented certificates to each of the event vendors at the Saigon Grand Center. I also attended the Car Seat and pedestrian Safety Event at Hyundai, then the Fountain Valley Friends of the Library “Buck a Bag Book Sale” at the Fountain Valley Library. Lastly, I stopped by the Palm Island Community Rummage Sale.

July 17 Participated in the PCTA (Public Cable Television Authority) Board Subcommittee Meeting by phone regarding the channel 3 programming.

July 18 Watched the replay of the July 12, 2023 FV Planning Commission Meeting, then watched the OC Board of Supervisors Meeting on the County’s website.

Council Member Harper
June 21 Attended the PCTA Board meeting and Finamore Place Affordable Housing in Anaheim
June 22 Appeared on Vietface TV speaking about Fountain Valley and the SARFPA meeting
June 26 Attended the OCTA Board meeting
June 27 Attended the lunch at the city yard
June 28 Attended the OCTA Finance Committee meeting
July 10 Attended the OCTA Board Meeting
July 12 Attended the OCTA Finance Committee meeting

ADJOURN THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING

AUTHORITY

Mayor Constantine adjourned the meeting at 8:45 pm to the next Meeting of the Fountain Valley City Council on August 15, 2023 at 6:00 p.m., in the Fountain Valley Council Chambers, 10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 15 ends

Kim Constantine, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk

Page 16 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: City of Fountain Valley Register of Demands for the period of 7/8/2023 to 8/4/2023 Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☒ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City ☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Attached is the Register of Demands for the City of Fountain Valley to be ratified by the City Council.

DISCUSSION:

Pursuant to the State of California’s Government Code 37201 through 37210, the Director of Finance or their designated representative hereby certify to the accuracy of the following demands and to the availability of funds for payment thereof. Demands paid by the city shall be inspected and ratified by the legislative body on the next available Council agenda. The Finance Department has prepared the attached Register of Demands summarizing the City's payments released since the previous City Council meeting.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:

The attached Register of Demands represents payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 7/8/2023 and 8/4/2023 for a total of $13,275,975.60.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City reviewed this staff report and concurs with the recommended action.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

Page 17 ends

Page 2 ends

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve the attached Register of Demands.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve as presented and provide direction to staff.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 to approve the attached Register of Demands representing payments made by the City of Fountain Valley between 7/8/2023 and 8/4/2023 for a total of $13,275,975.60.

Prepared by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Reviewed by: Colin Burns, City Attorney
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachment 1: Register of Demands 7/8/2023 to 8/4/2023.

Page 18 ends

City Of Fountain Valley
Register of Demands
7/8/2023 - 8/4/2023

Department

Check
Date Vendor Description Invoice #
Check/ACH
# Amount
10000000 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
07/17/23 U.S. BANK CORPORATE CITY PCARDS JUNE 2023 4246 0445 5574 3131 15410 931 72,368.01 07/26/23 REFUND ONE-TIME RFND OVERPMT OF ANNL FIRE PERMIT 16134 2306750 1,026.00

TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 73,394.01
10010100 CITY COUNCIL
07/12/23 CONSTANTINE, KIM TRANSPORTATION AT ICSC 15162 2306460 32.54

TOTAL CITY COUNCIL 32.54
10010102 LEGAL SERVICES
07/26/23 HARPER AND BURNS, LL CITY LEGAL SERVICES - JUNE 2023 15968 2306712 13,211.40

TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 13,211.40
10010103 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
07/12/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHAM CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP FEE 15047 2306464 1,600.00 07/12/23 KNIGHT LEADERSHIP SO CITY COUNCIL STATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT 14232 2306492 6,000.00 07/26/23 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC MEMBERSHIP DUES 15972 2306771 7,008.00 08/02/23 TRIPEPI, SMITH & ASS GENERAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES 15048 2306880 47.50 07/26/23 ORANGE COUNTY TREASU LAFCO MEMBERSHIP FY 2023-2024 15811 2306738 8,581.16 07/26/23 ORANGE COUNTY COUNCI ANNUAL OCCOG DUES 15971 2306736 8,747.15 08/02/23 ORANGE CNTY CITY MAN MEMBERSHIP RENEWL FOR FY23/24 16214 2306846 1,210.00

TOTAL OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER 33,193.81
10010104 ADMIN SERVICES
07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS ADMIN CP'S 6/26 - 7/25/23 15117 2306573 121.79 07/12/23 AT&T MOBILITY ADMINISTRATION 5/27 - 6/26/23 15119 2306441 57.47 07/12/23 MMASC ANNUAL CONFERENCE REGISTRATION - 15073 2306501 550.00 07/12/23 RWR MARKETING & GRAP RETAIL GUIDE PRINTS 15297 2306543 665.04 08/02/23 ALLEGRA CONSULTING, BRAND IDENTITY 15970 2306817 4,500.00

TOTAL ADMIN SERVICES 5,894.30
10010105 RECORDS MANAGEMENT
07/12/23 ORANGE COUNTY REGIST LEGAL NOTICE - MAY 2023 14836 2306505 1,656.20 07/12/23 GRM INFORMATION MANA STORAGE 6/1 - 6/30/23 15159 2306477 60.67 07/26/23 ORANGE COUNTY REGIST LEGAL NOTICE - 06/01 - 06/30/2023 15974 2306737 1,813.94

TOTAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT 3,530.81
10020200 HUMAN RESOURCES
07/27/23 AT&T MOBILITY HR CELL JUNE 2023 15999 2306790 117.53 07/12/23 D.F.POLYGRAPH HR DEPT PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 15106 2306463 175.00 07/12/23 SHRED-IT USA LLC HR ACCT #1000103178/DATE OF SERVICE: 15140 2306547 110.08 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS HR DEPT CELL PHONES (VERIZON 15282 2306579 210.04 07/19/23 MEMORIAL CARE MEDICA WARDELL-PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAM SERVICES 15386 2306618 93.00 07/19/23 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC JUNE 2023 HR DEPT LIVESCAN AND 15886 2306599 452.00

Page 19 ends

07/26/23 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W JUNE 2023 - CLIENT MATTER NO: FO030-00024 16103 2306719 306.00 07/26/23 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W JUNE 2023 - CLIENT MATTER NO: FO030-00001 16107 2306720 923.00 07/26/23 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W JUNE 2023 - CLIENT MATTER NO: FO030-00025 16109 2306721 272.00 07/26/23 DEPARTMENT OF THE TR PCOR FEE- FY 2023 (2ND QUARTER) 16116 2306706 726.00 07/26/23 MEMORIAL CARE MEDICA HR DEPT PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS & 16140 2306723 2,618.00 07/19/23 NATIONAL TESTING NET NTN LAW ENFORCEMENT EXAM 15340 2306626 425.00 08/02/23 THE INTERSECT GROUP HR DEPT TEMP STAFF (NICOLE CAMPAGNOLO 16318 2306877 1,199.28 08/02/23 THE INTERSECT GROUP HR TEMP SERVICES 7/17-7/23 CAMPAGNOLO 16301 2306876 1,998.80 08/02/23 GALLATIN INVESTIGATI INVOICE 2023-0002 BACKGROUND REPORT 16319 2306829 375.00 08/02/23 THE INTERSECT GROUP TEMP SERVICES 7/24-7/30/23 NC 16330 2306878 1,199.28

TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 11,200.01
10030300 PLANNING
08/02/23 PHIL MARTIN & ASSOCI MND FOR OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE 16160 2306849 20,000.00 07/19/23 ORANGE COUNTY REGIST ADVERTISEMENTS PC MEETINGS 6/1 -6/30/23 15251 2306629 1,226.36 07/12/23 PHIL MARTIN & ASSOCI MND for Bonanni Development project 15305 2306508 1,750.00 07/19/23 ALLEGRA CONSULTING, ALLEGRA CONSULTING - CROSSINGS 15429 2306586 3,000.00 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS PLNG,BLDG,CE CELL PHONES & IPADS 6/26- 15109 2306572 161.58 07/19/23 ESQUER, MARY-ELLEN COMMISSIONER STIPEND JULY 2023 15403 2306603 50.00 07/19/23 AJAMIAN, HERMAN JACK COMMISSIONERS JULY 2023 15404 938 50.00 07/19/23 LOPEZ, RICHARD COMMISSIONERS JULY 2023 15406 940 50.00 07/19/23 OSBORN, DAVID JOHN COMMISSIONERS JULY 2023 15407 943 50.00 07/19/23 SPEAR, WILLIAM A COMMISSIONERS JULY 2023 15412 945 50.00 07/19/23 SAAD, AZZAM COMMISSIONERS JULY 2023 15413 944 50.00 07/26/23 BLDG REFUND FULL REFUND FOR SOIL REVIEW FEE 15822 2306691 850.00

TOTAL PLANNING 27,287.94
10030301 BUILDING & SAFETY
07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER/PLANNING MIFI 6/23 - 7/22/23 15071 2306571 38.01 07/12/23 GRM INFORMATION MANA GRM Scanning 15189 2306477 307.20 07/12/23 GRM INFORMATION MANA GRM Scanning 15190 2306477 2,573.51 07/26/23 CALIFORNIA BUILDING SB1473 GREEN BUILDING FEES 2ND QTR 2023 15976 2306693 (112.60) 08/02/23 DEPARTMENT OF CONSER SMIP FEES 4TH QUARTER 2023 16250 2306825 (188.59) 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS PLNG,BLDG,CE CELL PHONES & IPADS 6/26- 15109 2306572 202.14 07/26/23 BLDG REFUND FULL REFUND FOR PLUMBING/MICROFICHE 15819 2306688 36.50 07/26/23 BLDG REFUND 80% REFUND FOR BUILDING PERMIT 23-581 15820 2306689 218.40 07/26/23 BLDG REFUND 80% REFUND FOR BUILDING PERMIT 23-1312 15821 2306687 240.00 08/02/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CTR/PLNG MIFI 7/23 - 8/22/23 16290 2306884 38.01 07/26/23 BLDG REFUND 80% REFUND FOR BUILDING PERMIT 2023-686 16026 2306690 218.40

TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 3,570.98
10040400 FINANCE
07/19/23 DAVIS FARR LLP FYE JUNE 30, 2023 AUDIT SERVICES 15903 2306598 8,780.00

TOTAL FINANCE 8,780.00
10040401 PURCHASING
07/12/23 QUADIENT LEASING USA POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 07/2023 -09/2023 15171 2306514 1,116.93 07/26/23 AMAZON ZEN ROOM SUPPLIES 1KKT-C7WL-3W6L 15893 951 86.98 07/26/23 SPARKLETTS CITY HALL WATER DELIVERY 5/25, 6/7, & 6/21 15202 2306772 466.42

Page 20 ends

07/26/23 PROFORMA PRINTING SY PRINTED #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES 15957 2306740 776.68

TOTAL PURCHASING 2,447.01
10050500 ENGINEERING
07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS ENGINEERING CP 3-26-2023 TO 4-25-2023 15342 2306784 132.46 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING PLAN CHECKING SERVICES MARCH 2023 15846 2306713 10,200.00 07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS ENGINEERING CP 04/26/2023-05/25/2023 15343 2306785 135.31 07/26/23 DLT SOLUTIONS AUTOCAD MAY 2023-MAY 2024 16079 2306707 7,102.02 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING PLAN CHECKING SERVICES (APRIL 2023) 15851 2306713 10,050.00 07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS ENGINEERING CP 05-26-2023-06-25-2023 15344 2306656 135.57 07/26/23 CANON SOLUTIONS AMER CANON MAINTENANCE & SERVICE JUN 2023 16070 2306695 325.60 07/27/23 VERIZON WIRELESS ENGINEERING CP 6/26/23-7/25/23 16229 2306813 135.31 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 24.15 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING PLAN CHECKING SERVICES (MAY 2023) 15861 2306713 7,050.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING PLAN CHECKING SERVICES JUNE 2023 15872 2306713 7,800.00

TOTAL ENGINEERING 43,090.42
10050501 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
07/19/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO CABLE INTERNET 5-09-2023 TO 6-08-2023 15345 2306593 194.62 07/26/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO REMOTE ACCESS 6/9 - 7/8/23 15376 2306697 194.62 07/27/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO CABLE INTERNET 7/09/2023-8/08/2023 16232 2306792 194.62

TOTAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 583.86
10050502 CONTSRUCTION INSP
07/12/23 NGUYEN, DANNY 15264 2306503 4,000.00
08/04/23 REFUND ONE-TIME PARTIAL REFUND 16067 2306894 4,000.00

TOTAL CONTSRUCTION INSP 8,000.00
10050503 STREET LIGHTING
07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS OCT 2022 15934 2306672 6,773.40 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU GALENA KD REMOVAL OCT 2022 15941 2306673 2,600.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS NOV 2022 15943 2306674 7,076.50 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS DEC 2022 15953 2306676 6,947.32 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS - JAN 2023 15955 2306677 906.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS FEB 2023 15981 2306678 4,330.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS - MARCH 2023 15990 2306681 5,383.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS - APRIL 2023 15994 2306683 614.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU MAGNOLIA & MARTIN KD REMOVAL NOV 2022 15952 2306675 3,040.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU BROOKHURST & ELLIS KD REMOVAL - FEB 2023 15986 2306679 2,225.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU BROOKHURST & SLATER KD REMOVAL - FEB 15987 2306680 2,230.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU LA ESTRELLA & ASH KD REMOVAL - MARCH 15993 2306682 2,480.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU MAGNOLIA & EDINGER KD REMOVAL - APRIL 15995 2306684 2,480.00 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS - MAY 2023 15996 2306685 6,559.90 07/12/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4/20 - 5/18/23 15146 2306548 4,549.77 07/26/23 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU STREET LIGHTS REPAIRS - JUNE 2023 15997 2306686 5,734.00 08/02/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO TRAFFIC SIGNALS 5/19 - 6/19/23 16311 2306872 5,032.50 07/12/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO STREET LIGHTS 6/1 - 6/30/23 15234 2306549 9,179.29 07/12/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO STREET LIGHTS - NEW 6/1 - 6/30/23 15147 2306550 17,575.83

TOTAL STREET LIGHTING 95,716.51

Page 21 ends

10050550 RIGHTS-OF-WAY
07/26/23 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, IN MEDIANS MONTHLY MAINTENANCE MAY 2023 16051 2306734 25,320.07 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 3.78 07/19/23 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, IN MEDIAN & ROW MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JUNE 15273 2306627 25,320.07 07/19/23 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, IN BROOKHURST MEDIAN IRRIGATION RENO 15274 2306628 7,474.00 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO MEDIANS ELECTRICITY BILL 5/22/03 - 6/20/23 16001 2306763 515.61 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO ROW ELECTRICITY BILL 6/2/23 - 7/2/23 16003 2306765 80.06

TOTAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY 58,713.59
10050551 TREE MAINTENANCE
07/19/23 GREAT SCOTT TREE SER Removal and Replanting for January 10711 2306611 1,400.00 07/12/23 GREAT SCOTT TREE SER BROADLEAF TRIMMING OF F-5 15019 2306476 2,394.00 07/12/23 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S PARTS FOR MEDIANS TO WATER-TREE 15029 2306481 283.89 07/26/23 KIRBY BUILT MEMORIAL BENCH 15963 2306716 1,393.79 07/26/23 KIRBY BUILT MEMORIAL BENCH-CAST BRONZE PLAQUE 15961 2306715 161.87

TOTAL TREE MAINTENANCE 5,633.55
10050552 PARK MAINTENANCE
07/12/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE 2ND CHEMICAL APPLICATION - RESIDENTIAL 15020 2306495 34,223.00 07/19/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK - CITY HALL 15021 2306619 5,104.00 07/12/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK - SENIOR CENTER 15022 2306496 1,210.00 07/12/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK - WESTMONT PARK 15023 2306497 4,600.00 07/19/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE CIVIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - MAY 2023 15024 2306620 2,773.62 07/12/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE PARKS MAINTENANCE - MAY 2023 15025 2306498 16,323.66 07/12/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK - SENIOR CENTER 15026 2306499 578.00 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO IRGTN & LIGHTS (MCDOWELL PARK) 5/18/23 - 14763 2306761 26.99 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 6.40 07/12/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO FULTON NORTH PARK LEASE 2024 - ANNUAL 15053 928 1,084.99 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE PLAVAN PARK 15241 2306639 13,000.00 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO PARKS & IRIG ELECTRICITY (NIEBLAS) 6/5/23 - 16018 2306768 20.65 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO PARKS IRRG ELECTRICITY 05/26/23 - 6/26/23 & 16020 2306769 1,082.56 07/26/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE CIVIC FAC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE JUNE 16054 2306725 2,773.62 07/26/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE PARKS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CON-19-28 16055 2306726 17,073.66 08/02/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO MCDOWELL PARK IRR/LIGHTS ELEC 06/19/23 - 16258 2306870 25.33

TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 99,906.48
10050553 CONCRETE MAINTENANCE
07/19/23 RESOURCE BUILDING MA SILICA SAND 15390 2306632 394.04 07/19/23 RESOURCE BUILDING MA CONCRETE MIX 15391 2306633 289.67 07/26/23 UNITED RENTALS NORTH UTILITY REPAIR 10287 SLATER 15948 2306779 279.49 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 123.69 07/19/23 UNITED RENTALS NORTH SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT-9051 CARDINAL 15842 2306651 274.59 07/19/23 UNITED RENTALS NORTH REPLACE SIDEWALK-10737 LA TERRAZA 15841 2306650 279.49 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 4.04

TOTAL CONCRETE MAINTENANCE 1,645.01
10050554 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE
07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS STREETS CELL PHONE (5/26/23-6/25/23)) 15394 2306663 254.13 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 16.14

Page 22 ends

08/02/23 VULCAN MATERIAL COMP UTILITY REPAIR-10115 TALBERT 16178 2306887 321.37 08/02/23 VULCAN MATERIAL COMP UTILITY REPAIR-MAGNOLIA AND BISHIP 16176 2306886 121.05

TOTAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 712.69
10050555 STORM DRAIN MAINT
07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 5.58 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO WALNUT PUMP STN GAS BILL 6/2/23 - 7/3/23 15194 2306555 58.91 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO SANDALWOOD PUMP STN GAS BILL 6/5/23 - 15198 2306559 26.13 07/27/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO STORM PMP STN ELECTRICITY 6/19/23 - 7/19/23 16092 2306810 912.16

TOTAL STORM DRAIN MAINT 1,002.78
10050556 TRAFFIC CONTROL
07/12/23 ROADLINE PRODUCTS IN Street Name Signs 15060 2306542 24,197.86 07/27/23 ROADLINE PRODUCTS IN CAPS AND CROSS SADDLES FOR STREET 15894 2306805 1,100.56 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 3.62

TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL 25,302.04
10050557 STREET SWEEPING
07/12/23 SCA OF CA, LLC STREET SWEEPING - MARCH 15018 2306546 29,267.80 08/02/23 SCA OF CA, LLC STREET SWEEPING - MAY 2023 16302 990 31,940.42

TOTAL STREET SWEEPING 61,208.22
10050558 RECREATION CENTER
07/12/23 GRAINGER, INC. YELLOW TAPE FOR TRILER USED FOR STAGE- 15175 2306475 243.22 07/19/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK SPORTS PARK IRRIGATION 15301 2306621 1,330.00 07/19/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK SPORTS PARK NEW SOD 15311 2306622 924.00 07/19/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SPORTS PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAY 15324 2306623 31,057.99 07/12/23 SAKIOKA WHOLESALE NU SP PLANT MATERIAL FOR HILL SW OF FIELD D 15176 2306544 215.50 07/12/23 SAKIOKA WHOLESALE NU MAINT. REPAIR OF PLANTER OUTSIDE OF 15219 2306545 971.91 07/12/23 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, IN ADDITIONAL LABOR TO REMOVE WEEDS FOR 15236 2306504 2,800.00 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 3.19 07/26/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE Sports Park Landscape Maintenance JUNE 2023 16053 2306724 33,857.99 07/26/23 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SPORTS PARK ADDITIONAL TURF RENO 16056 2306727 1,150.00

TOTAL RECREATION CENTER 72,553.80
10050559 GRAFFITI CONTROL
08/02/23 VISTA PAINT CORP GRAFFITI COVER PAINT 16152 2306885 475.82 07/19/23 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORA ROLLERS AND BRUSHES FOR GRAFFITI 15387 2306602 220.44

TOTAL GRAFFITI CONTROL 696.26
10060600 FIRE SUPPRESSION
08/04/23 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPME SCOTT EPIC 3 VOICE AMPS - BREATHING 13016 2306895 3,278.49 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE AVL TRACKERS 6/23/23 - 7/22/23 15130 2306575 950.25 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE CELL PHONES 6/26/23 - 7/25/23 15138 2306577 180.78 07/12/23 AMAZON CELL PHONE CASE L. LEE - INV# 1KXY-CD1W- 15144 910 15.20 07/12/23 L.N. CURTIS & SONS CLASS A FORM CONCENTRATE 15153 2306493 1,732.28 07/19/23 CENTRAL NET OPERATIO FALL/SPRING TRAINING HOURS 15831 2306592 11,555.00 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY FIRE BACK UP CELLS 6.9.23 - 7.8.23 15951 2306670 120.72 07/26/23 MEMORIAL CARE MEDICA FIRE ANNUAL PHYSICALS 15989 2306723 3,638.00 07/12/23 AFSS SOUTHERN DIVISI ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FOR JULIEANN 15141 2306423 60.00 07/12/23 RAPCO INDUSTRIES, IN NEW CHAIN FOR CHAINSAW 15289 2306515 218.96

Page 23 ends

08/02/23 CITY OF ANAHEIM/METR FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES-METRO NET 1ST 16139 2306820 155,812.00 07/12/23 METRO CITIES FIRE AU FIRE - e-DSR SOFWARE 15287 2306500 2,371.00 07/27/23 AT&T MOBILITY FIRE CELL PHONES NEW WITH FIRST NET 16150 2306789 74.43 08/02/23 RAPCO INDUSTRIES, IN SHARPENED CUTTERS & REMOVE/REINSTALL 16127 2306850 37.03 08/02/23 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APPARATUS MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 16142 2306873 725.21 08/02/23 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APPARATUS MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 16143 2306873 118.00 08/02/23 OCFCA ORANGE COUNTY FIRE CHIFES ASSOCIATION 16128 2306845 135.00

TOTAL FIRE SUPPRESSION 181,022.35
10060601 PARAMEDICS
07/27/23 PURETEC INDUSTRIAL W FIRE - DEIONIZED WATER SYSTEM STATION 1 16145 2306803 121.19 07/27/23 PURETEC INDUSTRIAL W FIRE - DEIONIZED WATER SYSTEM STATION 2 16144 2306803 121.19 08/02/23 RWR MARKETING & GRAP PARAMEDIC MEMBERSHIP BROCHURES 16105 2306865 382.51

TOTAL PARAMEDICS 624.89
10060602 AMBULANCE SERVICES
07/26/23 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15950 2306722 145.02 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS AMBULANCE AVL TRACKERS 6/23/23 - 7/22/23 15129 2306574 152.04 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS AMBULANCE CELL PHONES 6/26/23 - 7/25/23 15131 2306576 83.54 07/12/23 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15132 2306494 2,304.89 07/12/23 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15133 2306494 3,269.92 07/12/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15136 2306446 250.36 07/12/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15248 2306446 1,858.40 07/12/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15249 2306446 2,453.07 07/12/23 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT OXYGEN TANK RENTALS FIRE STATION 1 15125 2306561 139.50 07/12/23 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT OXYGEN TANK RENTALS FIRE STATION 2 15126 2306561 62.00 07/26/23 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES, AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES - JUNE '23 15945 974 12,971.18 07/26/23 CARE AMBULANCE AMBULANCE SERVICES SURGE BILLING JUNE 15946 959 9,688.13 07/26/23 CARE AMBULANCE AMBULANCE SERVICES PAY PERIOD 15947 959 84.26 07/12/23 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 15286 2306494 332.67 07/27/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 16146 2306791 963.01 07/27/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 16147 2306791 1,330.27 07/27/23 BOUND TREE MEDICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 16148 2306791 237.06 08/02/23 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT FIRE STATION OXYGEN TANKS 16125 2306874 142.50 07/27/23 LIFE ASSIST MEDICAL SUPPLIES 16149 2306800 8.04 08/02/23 PCARD ONE TIME PAY WITTMAN JULY 2023 REFUND FOR MIGUEL 16122 2306848 1,718.75

TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICES 38,194.61
10060603 FIRE PREVENTION
07/12/23 GALLS, LLC FIRE DUTY UNIFORM ITEMS FOR T. NGUYEN 15142 2306471 524.71 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE CELL PHONES 6/26/23 - 7/25/23 15138 2306577 132.72 07/12/23 GRM INFORMATION MANA FIRE FILE STORAGE - 6.1.23 - 6.30.23 15246 2306477 9.31 07/26/23 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC FIRE PLAN CHECKS JUNE '23 15949 2306701 3,630.00 07/12/23 GALLS, LLC FIRE DUTY UNIFORM ITEMS FOR T. NGUYEN 15143 2306471 180.09 08/02/23 GALLS, LLC DUTY UNIFORM ITEMS FOR THANG NGUYEN 16102 2306830 565.66 08/02/23 OCFCA ORANGE COUNTY FIRE CHIFES ASSOCIATION 16128 2306845 105.00

TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 5,147.49

Page 24 ends

10060604 FIRE RESERVES
07/12/23 DELGADILLO, JUAN P. FIRE RESERVE MEAL STIPENED FOR JUNE '23 15128 913 20.00

TOTAL FIRE RESERVES 20.00
10060605 DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE CELL PHONES 6/26/23 - 7/25/23 15138 2306577 43.77

TOTAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS 43.77
10060607 F.I.R.S.T.
07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE CELL PHONES 6/26/23 - 7/25/23 15138 2306577 1.59

TOTAL F.I.R.S.T. 1.59
10070700 PATROL
07/12/23 CALIF POLICE CHIEFS' MEMBER DUES 2023-2024 15124 2306448 1,702.00 07/19/23 GALLS, LLC VEST - LAGUISAN 15813 2306610 1,302.23 07/12/23 GALLS, LLC ACADEMY SUPPLIES - L. WARDELL 15102 2306471 441.79 07/12/23 CITY OF SANTA ANA BOOKING FEES - APRIL 2023 15098 2306452 146.00 07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS DEPARTMENT CELL PHONES 6/26-7/25 16045 2306787 1,384.68 07/19/23 AT&T MOBILITY SHEPPARD/PARSONS CELL PHONES 15814 2306587 93.72 07/19/23 GALLS, LLC DIAZ ACADEMY SUPPLIES 15815 2306610 148.43 07/12/23 HSU, HENRY REIMBURSE FOR RECRUIT LDL BOOKS 15010 919 2,771.49 07/19/23 CALIF FORENSIC PHLEB BLOOD DRAWS - JUNE 2023 15402 2306590 605.00 07/19/23 CITY NET OUTREACH & ENGAGEMENT JUNE 2023 15401 2306594 24,723.25 07/19/23 SHRED-IT USA LLC SHRED-IT - 6/14 & 6/28 15817 2306641 280.00 07/26/23 MOSHER, BRIAN HOTEL & MEALS SLI 6/26-6/28/23 15932 2306728 459.80 07/26/23 GALLS, LLC VEST - GK 16022 2306710 1,325.81
07/26/23 LEXIPOL LLC ANNUAL L.E. POLICY MANUAL & DAILY 15930 2306718 12,888.53 07/26/23 SEEMANN, BRONWEN HOTEL CLI UPDATE 9/28/23 15933 973 341.79 07/12/23 PETTY CASH FIELD SER PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 15121 2306506 202.82 07/26/23 DOAN, LAWRENCE MEALS/MILEAGE TRAFFIC COLLISION BASIC 15954 961 114.67 07/26/23 NIELSEN, SHALAMAR REIMBURSE FOR TIP A COP EXPENSES 16047 970 107.46

TOTAL PATROL 49,039.47
10070701 INVESTIGATION
07/12/23 SPECIAL SERVICES GRO (2) DEVICES 8/1/23-7/31/24 15122 2306560 1,200.00 07/12/23 T-MOBILE USA TIMING ADVANCE - DR #23-15650 15100 2306562 25.00 07/12/23 T-MOBILE USA TIMING ADVANCE - DR #23-10947 15101 2306562 25.00 07/26/23 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC LIVE SCANS - JUNE 2023 15907 2306705 238.00 07/26/23 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLIC & PROPRIETARY RECORDS SEARCHES 15960 2306776 556.36 07/26/23 OCTMA ANNUAL DUES 2023-2024 16044 2306735 100.00 07/12/23 PETTY CASH FIELD SER PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 15121 2306506 78.52 07/26/23 COUNTY OF ORANGE AFIS - JULY 2023 16037 2306700 2,052.00

TOTAL INVESTIGATION 4,274.88
10070702 TRAFFIC
07/26/23 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CROSSING GUARDS - 5/28/23-6/10/23 15910 950 8,304.37 07/26/23 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CROSSING GUARDS - 6/11/23-6/24/23 15911 950 6,743.94

TOTAL TRAFFIC 15,048.31
10070703 CANINE
07/19/23 ADLERHORST INTERNATI ANNUAL K9 TRAINING 2023-2024 15160 2306585 2,900.00

Page 25 ends

07/19/23 ADLERHORST INTERNATI TRAINING AID & HARNESS 15123 2306585 284.46 07/26/23 ADLERHORST INTERNATI K-9 POMIX SUPPLIES 16040 2306667 544.14

TOTAL CANINE 3,728.60
10070705 L.E. COMMUNICATIONS
08/02/23 SPARKLETTS POLICE DEPT WATER DELIVERY 5/26 & 6/7/23 16336 2306891 338.75 07/12/23 HAM RADIO OUTLET, IN RACES ANTENNA 15105 2306478 1,774.42 07/12/23 CYRACOM INTERNATIONA NON-EMERGENCY TRANSLATIONS - JUNE 2023 15104 2306462 31.85 07/19/23 COUNTY OF ORANGE CHARGING BANKS, BATTERIES & REPAIR 15812 2306597 2,214.40 07/26/23 COUNTY OF ORANGE RADIO RE-PROGRAMMING - JUNE 15908 2306700 139.00 07/26/23 SPARKLETTS PD WATER DELIVERY - 6/21, 7/5 & 7/10 16038 2306772 366.13

TOTAL L.E. COMMUNICATIONS 4,864.55
10070707 CRIME PREVENTION
07/12/23 PREMIER UNIFORMS RSVP JACKETS 15103 2306510 2,478.25 07/26/23 J. GARDNER & ASSOCIA JR. POLICE BADGES 16043 2306714 686.50 07/12/23 PETTY CASH FIELD SER PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 15121 2306506 181.98

TOTAL CRIME PREVENTION 3,346.73
10070708 RANGE
07/12/23 CITY OF WESTMINSTER RANGE FEES - MAY 2023 15097 2306453 900.00 07/12/23 ADKINS, BERTRUM A. RANGEMASTER SERVICES - JUNE 2023 15107 909 875.00 07/26/23 CITY OF WESTMINSTER RANGE FEES - JUNE 2023 15909 2306698 900.00 07/26/23 ADKINS, BERTRUM A. RANGEMASTER SERVICES 2023-2024 - JULY 16039 949 875.00

TOTAL RANGE 3,550.00
10080800 RECREATION CENTER
07/27/23 EXPERIENCE AUDIO VID INVOICE FOR AUDIO PARK VIEW 15858 2306794 538.74 07/26/23 EXPERIENCE AUDIO VID AUDIO INVOICE FOR LOBBY RC 15860 2306709 1,047.42 07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER 5/2 - 6/1/23 15379 2306786 40.05 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1D19-FC3V-WDJP 15865 952 235.51

TOTAL RECREATION CENTER 1,861.72
10080801 ATHLETICS
07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND DID NOT MEET MINIMUM ENROLLMENT 15844 2306746 80.00 07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER 7/2 - 8/1/23 15373 2306661 88.83 07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER 5/2 - 6/1/23 15379 2306786 37.59 07/26/23 D&B UMPIRES Adult Softball Umpire (3) Games 15384 2306702 108.00

TOTAL ATHLETICS 314.42
10080802 FIELD OPERATIONS
07/26/23 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SU (112) 50lb. Field Liner for Ball Fields 16015 2306760 1,126.89 07/26/23 ULINE TRASH BAGS FOR FIELDS/EVENTS 15874 2306777 726.19 07/26/23 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SU (40) 50lb. Bags of Drying Agent for Ball Fields 16017 2306760 573.42

TOTAL FIELD OPERATIONS 2,426.50
10080810 SENIOR & COMM CENTER
07/26/23 ROGERS, ANTONY ODELL ENTERTAINMENT FOR INDEPENDENCE DAY 16132 2306757 300.00 07/12/23 PROFORMA PRINTING SY OFFICE SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES 15007 2306513 277.87 07/19/23 AWARDS & TROPHIES CO Nametags for Staff 15330 2306588 56.57 07/12/23 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT SC HELIUM TANK RENTAL & REFILL 15285 2306561 12.00 07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS COM SERVICES 6/2 - 7/1/23 15371 2306660 131.20

Page 26 ends

07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS COM SERVICES 7/2 - 8/1/23 15380 2306662 131.20 07/12/23 BLDG REFUND REFUND FOR RENTAL ON 08/13/2023 15306 2306445 115.00 07/26/23 S.C. GYM REPAIR SC FITNESS ROOM MONTHLY SERVICE & 16062 2306758 522.93 07/12/23 LEI JES CATERING SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES FOR 15174 920 898.36 08/02/23 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCT HELIUM TANK RENTAL 16306 2306874 12.50

TOTAL SENIOR & COMM CENTER 2,457.63
10080811 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION
07/26/23 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CA SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES - JUNE 16064 2306694 3,600.00

TOTAL SENIOR TRANSPORTATION 3,600.00
10080820 CONTRACT CLASSES
07/27/23 EXPERIENCE AUDIO VID SUNRIDGE AUDIO INVOICE 15854 2306793 2,154.98 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND PARTIAL REFUND FOR 154434-A1 13976 2306523 7.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 422210-A4 13983 2306520 168.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127013-A1 13984 2306522 158.00 07/12/23 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARN PAYMENT FOR 427182-A2 13991 912 70.00 07/12/23 POSTMASTER/U.S.POSTA POSTAGE FOR FALL FP 2023 15078 2306509 3,485.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127017-A1 15081 2306532 370.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127014-A1 15083 2306525 158.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127121-A1 15084 2306529 191.00 07/12/23 BRODERICK, JAY J. PAYMENT FOR 100321 15086 911 2,536.10 07/12/23 WEST GROVE VOLLEYBAL PAYMENT FOR 101955 15087 930 445.20 07/12/23 PLAY-WELL TEKNOLOGIE PAYMENT FOR 100714 15088 927 962.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127017-A1 15199 2306519 185.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CLASS REFUND 127015-A1 15200 2306530 191.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR CAMPOUT AND PD CAMP 15201 2306533 55.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 111075-A1 15205 2306524 85.14 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127014-A1 15207 2306534 158.00 07/12/23 BRODERICK, JAY J. PAYMENT FOR 127012-A1 15210 911 623.70 07/12/23 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR STRETCH & FLEX 15307 2306459 36.00 07/12/23 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR DRAWING & PAINTING AND LINE 15308 2306457 137.00 07/12/23 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR ZUMBA GOLD 15309 2306456 27.50 07/12/23 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR ZUMBA GOLD 15310 2306458 22.00 07/19/23 COM SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR DRAWING & PAINTING 15350 2306595 91.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 125047-A1 15795 2306748 20.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 125047-A1 15796 2306743 20.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 125047-A1 15797 2306742 20.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127110-A1 15798 2306749 171.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127025-A2 15799 2306744 181.00 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 111070-A1 15800 2306745 85.14 07/26/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127025-A3 15801 2306747 216.00 07/19/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND-OVERPMT ON RC WEBSITE 03.22.23 15857 2306631 160.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 112040-A1 16191 2306856 127.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127012-A2 16194 2306860 158.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 122210-A4, 112211-A4 16195 2306853 264.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127025-A2 16197 2306854 35.00

Page 27 ends

08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127017-A1 16199 2306858 185.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127014-A1 16200 2306855 158.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 127012-A2 16201 2306851 158.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 122041-A1 16202 2306852 127.00

TOTAL CONTRACT CLASSES 14,401.76
10080821 SPECIAL EVENTS
08/02/23 FUN EXPRESS, LLC CONCERT SERIES GIVEAWAYS 16060 2306828 644.23 07/12/23 PHAIRAS, MATTHEW G. CONCERTS N THE PARK 2023 - ST 15326 2306507 2,000.00 07/12/23 CENICEROS, DAVID CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - B 15327 2306449 3,200.00 07/12/23 GOLDEN TICKET ENTERT CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - G 15328 2306472 4,000.00 07/13/23 DJE SOUND & LIGHTING CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - SO 15336 2306581 4,933.16 07/13/23 DJE SOUND & LIGHTING CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - SO 15337 2306582 4,933.16 07/13/23 DJE SOUND & LIGHTING CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - SO 15338 2306583 4,933.16 07/13/23 DJE SOUND & LIGHTING CONCERTS IN THE PARK 2023 - SO 15339 2306584 4,933.16 07/26/23 QUANTUM SIGNS & GRAP CONCERT IN THE PARK YARD SIGN 15864 2306741 176.18 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1MF3-6NJN-MFNJ 15866 953 152.20 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1QLF-D7DK-L97F 15868 954 264.44 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1TTK-1LRQ-KQTX 15870 955 67.91 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1VWJ-3741-XNQL 15871 956 487.87 07/26/23 AMAZON AMAZON INVOICE 1179-97D6-LT1C 15873 957 55.44 07/26/23 ULINE ULINE TRASH BAGS FOR EVENTS 15875 2306778 660.78 08/02/23 SWANK MOTION PICTURE MOVIE LICENSE FOR LIGHTYEAR 16206 2306875 450.00

TOTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 31,891.69
10080822 ANNUAL EVENTS
07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13971 2306531 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13972 2306526 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13974 2306516 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13975 2306518 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13978 2306521 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13980 2306527 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND CAMPOUT REFUND $10 13981 2306528 10.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 189060-A1 15091 2306517 45.00 07/12/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR CAMPOUT 15203 2306535 45.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 189060-A1 16204 2306857 45.00 08/02/23 REC SVCS REFUND REFUND FOR 189060-A1 16205 2306859 55.00

TOTAL ANNUAL EVENTS 260.00
10080823 PARK PATROL
07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER 7/2 - 8/1/23 15373 2306661 40.05 07/26/23 VERIZON WIRELESS REC CENTER 5/2 - 6/1/23 15379 2306786 51.18

TOTAL PARK PATROL 91.23
10091001 GENERAL FUND
07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING FINANCE OFFICE MAINT PROJECT 3/1 - 3/31/23 15825 2306614 3,300.00 07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CITY HALL SECURITY PROJECT 3/1 - 3/31/23 15833 2306614 1,155.00 07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING FINANCE OFFICE MAINT PROJECT 4/1 - 4/30/23 15827 2306614 1,485.00 07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CITY HALL SECURITY PROJECT 4/1 - 4/30/23 15834 2306614 5,445.00

Page 28 ends

07/26/23 AMAZON NEW FINANCE OFFICES AND MAILROOM 1MKR- 15891 951 959.47 07/19/23 OFFICE FURNITURE CON OFFICE FURNITURE - WALLS 15419 941 6,019.31 07/19/23 OFFICE FURNITURE CON FINANCE CUBICLE WALLS 15423 941 7,873.14 07/19/23 OFFICE FURNITURE CON DESKS AND CABINETS 15256 941 3,952.79 07/26/23 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DECOR 13RW-KN4D- 15892 951 300.54 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS CITY HALL SECURITY SYSTEM- ACCESS 15163 2306484 21,686.00 07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING FINANCE OFFICE MAINT PROJECT 5/1 - 5/31/23 15829 2306614 3,465.00 07/19/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CITY HALL SECURITY PROJECT 5/1 - 5/31/23 15835 2306614 1,320.00 07/12/23 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES - 1VVG-PHRV-13V7 15135 910 108.68 07/12/23 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES - 1TQP-PPY1-Y7W7 15137 910 120.01 07/12/23 AMAZON CUBICLE NAME PLATE HOLDERS 1RNN-CT4C- 15134 910 121.25 07/12/23 AMAZON CREDIT: CALENDAR RETURN INV# 1YCM-RLMM- 15139 910 (20.65)

TOTAL GENERAL FUND 57,290.54
10095000 GENERAL FUND
07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15231 2306434 1,674.75 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15233 2306435 1,674.75 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15227 2306430 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15229 2306432 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15230 2306433 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15177 2306424 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15178 2306425 556.26 07/12/23 TERRY LA CURAN AND S ANNUAL TOP DRESSING FOR FIELDS B & C 15218 2306563 8,470.24 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15225 2306428 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15226 2306429 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15228 2306431 551.14 07/19/23 KIRBY BUILT ADA TABLE FOR CITY HALL COURT YARD 15275 2306617 1,625.18 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15221 2306426 556.26 07/12/23 AGUINAGA GREEN, INC CERTIFIED TOPPER FOR SPORTS PARK 15224 2306427 556.26 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE LA CAPILLA PARK 15232 2306635 4,679.00 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE MCDOWELL PARK 15237 2306636 9,676.00 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE HARPER PARK 15238 2306637 10,362.00 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE FULTON PARK 15240 2306638 6,758.00 07/19/23 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES ROLL COAT MAINTENANCE PLAVAN PARK 15241 2306639 752.00

TOTAL GENERAL FUND 51,229.40
10096001 GENERAL FUND
07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION MGMT - FIRE STATION 15847 2306713 330.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - FIRE STATION REMODEL APRIL 15852 2306713 1,815.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - FIRE STATION REMODEL MAY 15862 2306713 1,815.00 07/19/23 CAL-STATE SITE SERVI FENCING FOR 17101 BUSHARD ST 15832 2306589 21,412.24 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - FIRE STATION REMODEL JUNE 15876 2306713 1,650.00

TOTAL GENERAL FUND 27,022.24
10097000 GF PROJ RECURRING
08/02/23 COUNTY OF ORANGE 800 MHZ COST ALLOCATION 7/1 - 9/30/23 16300 2306822 32,329.00

TOTAL GF PROJ RECURRING 32,329.00

Page 29 ends

10097001 GENERAL FUND
07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - PD LOCKER/RESTROOM/CSI 15848 2306713 2,800.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - PD LOCKER/RESTROOM/CSI 15853 2306713 727.36

TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,527.36
10098001 GENERAL FUND
07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - UAP EQUIPMENT MARCH 2023 15850 2306713 2,145.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - UAP EQUIPMENT APRIL 2023 15859 2306713 1,980.00 07/27/23 SECONEA, INC REC CTR OUTBUILDING SEP 2022-JUN 2023 16087 2306806 1,200.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - UAP MAY 15863 2306713 990.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONSTMGMT - UAP EQUIPMENT MAY 2023 15869 2306713 990.00 07/26/23 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONST MGMT - UAP EQUIPMENT JUNE 2023 15877 2306713 1,320.00

TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8,625.00
11010050 ISF IS ADMIN CAPITAL
07/12/23 CIVIC PLUS, LLC CIVIC ENGAGE SYSTEM TRAINING - 4 HOURS 15072 2306454 3,000.00 07/27/23 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC. WEB TRAC SOFTWARE - 7/1/23 - 6/30/24 16131 980 15,417.39 08/02/23 IMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, 8 PORT RACK CONSOLE KVM SWITCH/CABLE 14848 984 1,191.49 07/12/23 PACIFIC SERVICES ALFO PLUS 80 & INSTALLATION 15262 925 11,642.50 07/12/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT M9769-02 RATE CHARGE 5/17 - 15044 2306422 18.49 07/12/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT M9483-01 OVERAGE 6/1 - 6/30/23 15045 2306422 156.73 07/12/23 CODE 3 TECHNOLOGY, L GETAC B360 DOCK - HAVIS TF1 15113 2306455 2,919.58 07/19/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INSITE TRANSACTION FEES 4/1 - 6/30/23 15809 2306647 2,428.75 08/02/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT 41635 OVERAGE 4/3 - 5/2/23 16305 2306890 51.11 08/02/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT 41635 OVERAGE 5/3 - 6/2/23 16307 2306890 50.18 08/02/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN BASE RATE CHARGE M9769 6/17 - 7/16/23 16308 2306890 18.49 07/12/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO CH FIBER 7/1 - 7/30/23 15206 2306450 1,975.00 07/19/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO DIGITAL BOXES 7/1 - 7/31/23 15369 2306593 167.73 07/12/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT 41585-01 OVERAGE CHARGE 6/6- 15118 2306422 35.06 07/19/23 COMPUTER SOLUTIONS BARACUDA EMAIL PROTECTION 15810 2306596 10,200.00 08/02/23 CHARTER COMMUNICATIO SC COMP LAB 7/14 - 8/13/23 16283 2306819 229.98 07/27/23 ADVANCED OFFICE / IN CONTRACT 41194 OVERAGE - 6/18/23 TO 7/17/23 16151 2306788 15.21

TOTAL ISF IS ADMIN CAPITAL 49,517.69
11010104 ISF IS
08/02/23 CMS SOLUTIONS 3/24/23 - MOVED EXTENSIONS #506/559/502 & 16264 2306821 105.00 08/02/23 CMS SOLUTIONS 6/1/23 - MOVED EXTENSIONS & FAX LINE 16265 2306821 157.50 07/12/23 AT&T MOBILITY IT PHONES 5/27 - 6/26/23 15120 2306442 94.92 07/27/23 AT&T MOBILITY EMERGENCY IT PHONE 5/27 - 6/26/23 16154 2306789 42.84 07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS IS CELL PHONES 6/29 - 7/28/23 15367 2306659 46.77 07/26/23 CMS SOLUTIONS MOVE EXTENSIONS #250, #256, & #257 16133 2306699 105.00

TOTAL ISF IS 552.03
11094001 ISF IS FINANCE PRJ NON-REC
07/12/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP - HCM A ABRAHAM 6/20 & 6/22 C ROBBINS 15235 2306565 4,200.00 08/02/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 6/26/23 PROJECT MANAGER - CHANDRA 15830 2306881 1,400.00 08/02/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-HCM MUNIS MIGRATION 7/6/23 A ABRAHAM 16295 2306893 1,400.00 08/02/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-HCM MUNIS MIGRATION 7/12/23 A 16293 2306893 1,400.00

Page 30 ends

08/02/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IMP-HCM MUNIS MIGRATION 7/18 & 7/20 A 16292 2306893 2,800.00

TOTAL ISF IS FINANCE PRJ NON-REC 11,200.00
11110000 ISF GB CITY HALL
07/26/23 SUPERIOR POOL PRODUC FOUNTAIN CHEMICALS 14164 2306775 51.40 07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 125.00 07/12/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN PEST & RODENT CONTROL - CITY HALL - JUNE 14979 2306539 72.00 07/19/23 OFFICE FURNITURE CON IT WALLS AND FURNITURE 15788 941 7,509.16 07/12/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI T-1 METRO NET 6/25 - 7/24/3 15068 2306466 697.54 07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS FLEET CELL PHONE 5/26/23-6/25/23 15349 2306658 113.57 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 50.43 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG CITY HALL-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16209 2306847 1,887.00 07/12/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI EOC LINES 6/28 - 7/27/23 15116 2306470 535.85 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 82.59 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO CITY HALL GAS BILL 6/2/23 - 7/3/23 15188 2306552 354.50 07/19/23 VERIZON SELECT SERVI LD SELECT 6/1 - 6/29/23 15377 2306655 16.06 07/26/23 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 FY22/23 15917 2306708 3,347.93 07/27/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO CITY HALL ELECTRICITY BILL 6/6/23 - 7/7/23 16013 2306809 13,575.29 07/19/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI METRONET 7/1 - 7/31/23 15364 2306607 530.97 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN CITY HALL PEST CONTROL MONTHLY SERVICE 16036 2306752 72.00 08/02/23 DAVID CROWELL ELECTR STORES REHAB 16238 2306823 410.00 08/02/23 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY CH MATER KEY 16242 2306840 44.93 08/02/23 DAVID CROWELL ELECTR IT OFFIC REHAB 16294 2306824 1,000.00

TOTAL ISF GB CITY HALL 30,476.22
11110001 ISF GB B&G CLUB
08/02/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS B&G CLUB FIRE SYSTEM MONITORING 16240 2306837 568.89 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS BOYS/GIRLS CLUB -QTLY FIRE SYSTEM 7/1/23- 15254 2306489 568.89

TOTAL ISF GB B&G CLUB 1,137.78
11150000 ISF GB CITY YARD
07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS YARD QUARTERLY (BURG/FIRE COMBO) 7/1/23- 15239 2306485 361.83 07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 25.68 07/12/23 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERV ELEVATOR SERVICE CITY YARD JULY 2023 15074 2306436 221.67 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG CITY YARD-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16213 2306847 1,017.96 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO CORP YARD GAS BILL 6/5/23 - 7/5/23 15197 2306558 14.59 07/26/23 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 FY22/23 15917 2306708 2,700.49 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO CITY YARD ELECTRICITY BILL 6/2/23 - 7/2/23 16000 2306762 1,417.90 07/26/23 AMERICAN FIRST AID I FIRST AID PRODUCTS 16023 2306669 745.03 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN QTLY PEST SERVICE-CITY YARD-JULY 2023 16049 2306756 142.00 08/02/23 AT&T FS#2 & CY PHONE 6/22 - 7/21/23 16281 2306818 139.44 08/02/23 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY STREET BAY KEYS 16291 2306841 83.72

TOTAL ISF GB CITY YARD 6,870.31
11160001 ISF GB FS1
08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC Repairs CON-19-65 FY22/23 (F1)Capt's A/C 11588 2306896 370.00 08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIRS CON-19-65 FY22/23(F1)CAPTS 12448 2306896 2,004.00 07/26/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG LEAK SEAL KIT 16031 2306739 336.00 07/26/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG FAN BLADE CONDENSER MOTOR 16032 2306739 1,110.00

Page 31 ends

07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 20.83 07/12/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FS#1 CKT 5/22-7/21/23 15069 2306467 110.94 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG FIRE STATION #1-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16210 2306847 765.00 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO FIRE STATION #1 GAS BILL 6/2/23 - 7/3/23 15192 2306553 259.19 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO FIRE STATION #1 ELECTRICITY BILL 5/26/23 - 16007 2306767 2,112.16 07/19/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI CKT FS#1 METRONET 7/1 - 7/31/23 15366 2306609 57.15 08/02/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI FS#1 PHONE 7/13 - 8/12/23 16288 2306827 380.82 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN QTLY PEST SERVICE-FIRE STATION 1-JULY 16048 2306755 81.00

TOTAL ISF GB FS1 7,607.09
11160002 ISF GB FS2
07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 20.83 07/12/23 PROFESSIONAL PLUMBIN CLEAR SEWER LINE AT FIRE STATION #2 14975 2306512 294.00 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG FIRE STATION #2-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16211 2306847 418.20 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO FIRE STATION #2 GAS BILL 6/5/23 - 7/5/23 15196 2306557 81.21 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO FIRE STATION #2 ELECTRICITY BILL 5/19/23 - 16002 2306764 1,010.32 08/02/23 AT&T FS#2 CKT METRO 6/20 - 7/19/23 16267 2306818 58.10 08/02/23 AT&T FS#2 & CY PHONE 6/22 - 7/21/23 16281 2306818 357.85 08/02/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO FIRE STATION #2 ELECTRICITY 06/20/23 - 16257 2306869 1,438.74

TOTAL ISF GB FS2 3,679.25
11160003 ISF GB BUSHARD
08/02/23 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, IN SURVEILLANCE SIGNS FOR 17101 BUSHARD 16236 2306889 1,012.34 07/27/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO NEW FIRE STATION ELECTRICITY 06/28/23 - 16156 2306811 530.62

TOTAL ISF GB BUSHARD 1,542.96
11170000 ISF GB POLICE DEPARTMENT
08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG REPAIR SERVER ROOM HVAC PD 14648 2306897 276.00 07/12/23 COUNTY OF ORANGE OCATS - JUNE 2023 15096 2306461 1,374.20 07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 125.00 07/12/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN PEST & RODENT CONTROL - PD - JUNE 2023 14980 2306540 107.00 07/12/23 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERV ELEVATOR SERVICE PD JULY 2023 15077 2306438 200.41 07/19/23 TRICOM FIRE & ELECTR FIRE ALARM DISPLAY REPLACEMENT 15348 2306646 2,545.00 07/12/23 UNITED RENTALS NORTH REMOVE FILE CABINET PD 6/21/23 14991 2306566 206.63 07/12/23 GRAINGER, INC. REHAB IT ROOM PD - CARPET 14976 2306474 205.48 07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS PD MDC 6/23 - 7/22/23 15208 2306578 1,210.91 07/26/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG A-51 BELT IN COMPUTER ROOM FROM 16033 2306739 230.00 07/26/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG REPLACED CRANKCASE HEATERS AND 16034 2306739 2,256.00 07/26/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG REPLACED COMPRESSOR AND RECHARGED 16035 2306739 6,041.00 07/27/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG PD-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16208 2306802 2,142.00 07/12/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI CENTRA NET TO 911 6/28 - 7/27/23 15114 2306468 297.44 07/12/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI PD DISPATCH 6/28 - 7/27/23 15115 2306469 373.12 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO PD GAS BILL 6/2/23 - 7/3/23 15186 2306551 811.91 07/26/23 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 FY22/23 15917 2306708 6,960.84 07/27/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO POLICE DEPT ELECTRICITY BILL 6/6/23 - 7/7/23 16011 2306808 10,506.71 07/27/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI JAIL PHONE 7/7 - 8/6/23 16158 2306796 93.89 07/27/23 GRAINGER, INC. IT REHAB 15969 2306798 654.70
07/27/23 GRAINGER, INC. IT REHAB 15967 2306797 60.07

Page 32 ends

08/02/23 GOLDSTAR PRODUCTS, I LIQUID DRAIN OPENER 16313 2306831 2,003.68 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN PD PEST CONTROL MONTHLY SERVICE -JULY 16029 2306751 107.00 08/02/23 VERIZON WIRELESS PD MDC 7/23 - 8/22/23 16289 2306883 1,135.62

TOTAL ISF GB POLICE DEPARTMENT 39,924.61
11180000 ISF GB REC CENTER
08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIRS CON-19-65 FY22/23(RC)NO 12451 2306896 414.00 08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC REPAIRS CON-19-65 FY22/23(RC)HOT 12454 2306896 590.00 07/26/23 DAY LITE MAINTENANCE FIELD LIGHT REPAIR 16004 2306703 2,706.61 07/26/23 DAY LITE MAINTENANCE FIELD LIGHT REPAIRS 16008 2306704 2,515.10 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS REC CENTER QTLY-CCTV 7/1/23-9/30/23 15242 2306486 361.83 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS REC CENTER QTLY FIRE SYSTEM 7/1/23-9/30/23 15270 2306490 500.13 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS REC CENTER QTLY-BURG ALARM 7/1/23-9/30/23 15271 2306491 189.00 07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 83.33 07/12/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN PEST & RODENT CONTROL - REC CENTER - 14977 2306537 82.00 07/12/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN PEST & RODENT CONTROL - SPORTS PARK - 14978 2306538 175.00 07/12/23 PROFESSIONAL PLUMBIN SNAKE MAIN LINE AT SP PONY BLDG 6/9/23 14974 2306511 275.00 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG REC CENTER-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16216 2306847 1,326.00 07/12/23 AR INDUSTRIES HARD WIRE ADA AUTO DOOR REC CENTER 14972 2306440 1,690.39 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG SPORTS PARK-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 2023 16215 2306847 214.20 08/02/23 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY REKEY PONY SNACK BAR 16237 2306839 410.30 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO REC CENTER GAS BILL 6/5/23 - 7/5/23 15195 2306556 238.34 07/26/23 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 FY22/23 15917 2306708 14,398.21 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO PARK & RIDE ELECTRICITY BILL 6/6/23 - 7/7/23 16005 2306766 331.96 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN SPORTS PARK PEST CONTROL MONTHLY 16042 2306753 175.00 07/26/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN REC CENTER PEST CONTROL MONTHLY-JULY 16046 2306754 82.00 08/02/23 AT&T FS#2 & CY PHONE 6/22 - 7/21/23 16281 2306818 121.59 08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. TOILET PAPER DISPENSER ROLLS 16298 2306834 263.91 08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. BATTTERIES FOR FLUSHERS AND PAPER 16296 2306833 156.51

TOTAL ISF GB REC CENTER 27,300.41
11180001 ISF GB SR CENTER
08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG (SC) Quarterly service HVAC 11546 2306896 1,499.40 08/04/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG HVAC Repairs CON-19-65 11589 2306896 553.00 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS SENIOR CENTER QTLY(BURG ALARM) 7/1/23- 15243 2306487 191.82 07/12/23 JMG SECURITY SYSTEMS SENIOR CENTER. QTLY (FIRE SYSTEM) 7/1/23- 15244 2306488 558.96 07/26/23 CLIMATEC, LLC TECHNICAL SVCS AGREEMENT 6/1 - 6/30/23 16010 960 83.33 07/12/23 ATR LIGHTING WEST, I LIGHTING REPAIR 15168 2306444 252.03 07/12/23 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERV ELEVATOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER JULY 15076 2306437 188.31 07/12/23 AR INDUSTRIES AUTOMATED DOOR REPAIR SENIOR CENTER 14971 2306439 826.28 08/02/23 PACIFIC COAST REFRIG FOUNDERS VILLAGE-PM SERVICE FOR JUNE 16212 2306847 1,499.40 07/12/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN SENIOR CENTER MONTHLY SERVICE-JUNE 15173 2306541 137.00 07/12/23 SO CALIF GAS CO SENIOR CENTER GAS BILL 6/2/23 - 7/3/23 15193 2306554 222.05 07/26/23 DMS FACILITY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES CON-19-54 FY22/23 15917 2306708 5,150.62 07/26/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO SENIOR CENTER ELECTRICITY BILL 5/26/23 - 16025 2306770 1,436.87 07/19/23 FRONTIER COMMUNICATI SC ELEV/FIRE 7/4 - 8/3/23 15365 2306608 295.25 08/02/23 ROAD RUNNER EXTERMIN SENIOR CENTER MONTHLY PEST SERVICE- 16241 2306863 137.00

Page 33 ends

08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. FITNESS ROOM DOOR 16309 2306835 668.95

TOTAL ISF GB SR CENTER 13,700.27
11250001 PW - FLEET MGMT
07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY CORE CREDIT 13171 2306604 (54.00) 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY CREDIT 13165 2306604 (51.00) 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PARTS CREDIT -REMAN STARTER 13175 2306604 (53.59) 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PARTS CREDIT 13174 2306604 (29.36) 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY CORE CREDIT 13168 2306604 (50.41) 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY CORE CREDIT 13170 2306604 (144.18) 08/02/23 SC FUELS FUEL CARDS 16180 2306866 27,681.62
07/26/23 SC FUELS BULK DIESEL STATION 2 15942 2306759 1,916.16 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 6.03 07/12/23 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 15266 2306536 119.82 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 70.81 07/12/23 HUB AUTO SUPPLY PART FOR UNIT 8020 15268 2306480 28.00 07/26/23 SC FUELS MONTHLY FUEL CARDS - JUNE 2023 16019 2306759 28,542.49 07/19/23 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 15359 2306634 37.58 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS STOCK BATTERY 15357 2306604 134.13 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS OIL FOR FIRE STATION 15354 2306604 652.72 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PART FOR UNIT 203 15355 2306604 50.01 07/19/23 DEPT 143 UNIT 402 ALIGNMENT 15358 2306600 119.00 08/02/23 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 16226 2306862 177.49 07/19/23 THEODORE ROBINS FORD PART FOR UNIT 218 15353 2306645 101.47 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS STOCK BOTTLE OILS 15356 2306604 471.11 07/19/23 SPECIALISTS AUTOGLAS WINDSHIELD FOR UNIT 8202 15360 2306642 307.00 07/19/23 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS STOCK A/C FREON 15352 2306604 325.16 08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. STOCK PART 16228 2306832 19.44
08/02/23 THEODORE ROBINS FORD PART FOR UNIT 202 16223 2306879 144.17 08/02/23 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 16224 2306862 60.28 08/02/23 RINCON TRUCK CENTER, STOCK PARTS 16225 2306862 342.42 08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. DEF FOR FIRE STATION 2 16227 2306832 435.42 08/02/23 ALAN'S LAWNMOWER & G PART FOR UNIT 5773 FIRE STATION 1 16221 2306816 293.75 08/02/23 MCPEEK DODGE OF ANAH DODGE STOCK PART 16222 2306844 162.33

TOTAL PW - FLEET MGMT 61,815.87
11370053 ISF EQ PD R&C CAPITAL
07/19/23 OFFICE FURNITURE CON Desk, Lateral Files & Chair (Lt. Parsons) 15398 941 2,881.82 07/19/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES BRAZOS 15181 2306647 55,692.37 07/19/23 ADLERHORST INTERNATI BASIC HANDLER COURSE (QUOTE 073447) 15399 2306585 5,700.00 07/19/23 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES CREDIT INV# 130-0136335(TAXED AMOUNT) 15182 2306647 (254.37) 07/19/23 GALLS, LLC VEST - ERSKINE 15816 2306610 1,325.81

TOTAL ISF EQ PD R&C CAPITAL 65,345.63
11400000 ISF CITY SELF INSURANCE
07/26/23 ATHENS ADMINISTRATOR INITIAL ESCROW FUNDING - WC ADMIN 15998 958 25,000.00

TOTAL ISF CITY SELF INSURANCE 25,000.00
11400400 SELF INSURANCE

Page 34 ends

08/02/23 ADMINSURE INC. 16098 JULY ADMINSURE WORKERS COMP 16278 2306814 7,115.00 07/20/23 CALIF JOINT POWERS I FY 2023/24 GENERAL LIABILITY & WORKERS 15298 947 460,205.00 08/02/23 ADMINSURE INC. 16182 AUGUST ADMINSURE WORKERS COMP 16279 2306815 7,115.00 08/02/23 ATHENS ADMINISTRATOR Replenishment of checks written for 7/1/23-7/31/23 16329 982 877.27

TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 475,312.27
11400411 SELF INSURANCE
07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - SEPTEMBER 2020 15411 2306591 2,134.00 07/26/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - SEPTEMBER 2022 15925 2306696 1,666.00 07/26/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - OCTOBER 2022 15926 2306696 1,666.00 07/26/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - NOVEMBER 2022 15927 2306696 1,666.00 07/26/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - DECEMBER 2022 15928 2306696 1,666.00 07/26/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - SUBROGATION 15935 2306696 787.36 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - AUGUST 2020 15409 2306591 2,134.00 07/20/23 CALIF JOINT POWERS I FY 2023/24 GENERAL LIABILITY & WORKERS 15298 947 686,700.00 07/20/23 CALIF JOINT POWERS I EXCESS LIABILITY PROGRAM ADMIN FEE FY 15299 947 29,000.00 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - NOVEMBER 2020 15783 2306591 2,134.00 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - FEBRUARY 2021 15784 2306591 2,134.00 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - JUNE 2022 15785 2306591 2,134.00 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - JULY 2022 15786 2306591 1,666.00 07/19/23 CARL WARREN & COMPAN CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION - AUGUST 2022 15787 2306591 1,666.00 07/19/23 THE COUNSELING TEAM OCTOBER 2022 TCTI EMPLOYEE SUPPORT 15879 2306644 1,100.00 07/26/23 L/O OF BARBER & BAUE JUNE 2023 LEGAL SERVICES - GUIRGUIS 15939 2306717 847.17 07/26/23 L/O OF BARBER & BAUE JUNE 2023 LEGAL SERVICES - TILDEN 15940 2306717 3,291.88 08/02/23 L/O OF BARBER & BAUE LEGAL SERVICES - AUSTER 16130 2306842 21,968.76 08/02/23 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W HR RELATED CLAIMS - Taylor 16168 2306843 3,192.00 07/27/23 ALLIANT INSURANCE SE FY23/24 EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE POLICY 16244 978 141,697.09 07/19/23 HARPER AND BURNS, LL CSAC LEGAL FEES 15303 2306612 10,350.30 07/27/23 MILLER, GARY Property Damage Claim Payment 16098 2306801 400.00

TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 920,000.56
11400430 SELF INSURANCE
07/19/23 MYERS-STEVENS & TOOH POLICE LTD AUGUST 15416 2306625 1,514.70 07/26/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE FVFA LTD FOR AUGUST 2023 15975 963 663.00

TOTAL SELF INSURANCE 2,177.70
11500000 ISF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
07/12/23 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD GUILLEN, RENE - ACCT #607745390 15312 2306465 647.05 07/12/23 FVPOA PAC PR PPE 070723 POL DEDUCTIONS 15313 918 555.00 07/12/23 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOY PR PPE 070723 DPT & DYD DEDUCTIONS 15314 924 399.85 07/12/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLI PR PPE 070723 DPD DEDUCTIONS 15315 917 2,500.00 07/12/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY GENE PR PPE 070723 DGE DEDUCTIONS 15316 916 481.00 07/12/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE PR PPE 070723 DFR DEDUCTIONS 15317 915 2,860.97 07/12/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CRED PR PPE 070723 CU DEDUCTIONS 15318 914 44,913.10 07/12/23 PAYFLEX SYSTEMS USA, PR, PPE 070723 FSD & FSM DEDUCTIONS 15319 926 2,003.76 07/12/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR, PPE 070723 RHM DED PLAN #800414 15320 923 192.31 07/12/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR, PPE 070723 RHA & RHC DED PLAN #800389 15321 922 1,131.11 07/12/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR, PPE 070723 RHF & RHS DED PLAN #803216 15322 921 2,236.01

Page 35 ends

07/12/23 U.S. BANK N.A. PR, PPE 070723 PAR & PRE DEDUCTIONS 15323 929 1,832.97 07/26/23 AFLAC JULY 2023 AFLAC ACCT HH049 15973 2306668 2,866.50 07/19/23 OLVERA, ENRIQUE PR PPE 070723 REFUND-OLVERA, ENRIQUE 15791 942 7.10 07/26/23 STANDARD INSURANCE C 2307 VISION ACTIVE 15918 2306773 2,301.60 07/26/23 STANDARD INSURANCE C 2307_VISION_COBRA 15920 2306774 60.44 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO DELTACARE HMO - MUNICIPAL DENT 15978 2306730 2,189.72 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO AUGUST 2023 DELTA DENTAL PPO 15979 2306729 10,173.48 07/27/23 STERLING HEALTH SERV Second 50% Funding - FSA ACCT#GFSA1203831 16093 979 27,975.53 07/26/23 U.S. BANK N.A. PR PPE 072123 PAR DEDUCTIONS 16183 977 3,811.20 07/26/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR PPE 072123 RHF & RHS DED #803216 16184 967 2,211.01 07/26/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR PPE 072123 RHA & RHC DED #800389 16185 968 1,131.11 07/26/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P PR PPE 072123 RHM DED #800414 16186 969 192.31 07/26/23 PAYFLEX SYSTEMS USA, PR PPE 072123 FSD & FSM DEDUCTIONS 16187 972 2,003.76 07/26/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CRED PR PPE 072123 CU DEDUCTIONS 16188 976 44,580.10 07/26/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE PR PPE 072123 DFR DEDUCTIONS 16189 962 2,807.64 07/26/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY GENE PR PPE 072123 DGE DEDUCTIONS 16190 964 494.00 07/26/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLI PR PPE 072123 DPD DEDUCTIONS 16192 965 2,400.00 07/26/23 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOY PR PPE 072123 DPT & DYD DEDUCTIONS 16193 971 399.85 07/26/23 FVPOA PAC PR PPE 072123 POL DEDUCTIONS 16196 966 525.00 07/27/23 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD GUILLEN, RENE - ACCT# 607745390 16198 2306795 647.05

TOTAL ISF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 166,530.53
11500450 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
07/11/23 CALPERS 1959 SRVR BLNG SBT ADJ (PLN ID9244/MISC) 15255 906 415.20 07/11/23 CALPERS 1959 SRVR BLNG SBT ADJ (PLN ID9243/MISC) 15257 907 1,291.20 07/11/23 CALPERS 1959 SRVR BLNG SBT ADJ (PLN ID26658 15259 908 1,632.00 08/02/23 STERLING HEALTH SERV 708225 - FSA ADMIN FEES 06/01/203 - 06/30/2023 16272 991 94.50 08/02/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P MISSIONSQUARE RHS ACCOUNT FEE (4/01/23 - 16312 987 987.50 07/18/23 CALPERS UAL LUMP SUM PMT PL#25520 15417 932 2,584.00 07/18/23 CALPERS UAL LUMP SUM PMT PL#25519 15420 933 5,985.00 07/18/23 CALPERS UAL LUMP SUM PMT PL#9243 15421 934 2,378,872.00 07/18/23 CALPERS UAL LUMP SUM PMT PL#9003 15422 935 4,296,645.00 07/12/23 U.S. BANK N.A. PR, PPE 070723 PAR & PRE DEDUCTIONS 15323 929 38.41 08/02/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P MISSIONSQUARE PLAN FEE FOR 7/01/23 - 16247 986 125.00 07/19/23 BARR, MATTHEW ECOLOGY (BIO 1302) AND FIRE RESEARCH (FIR 15395 939 1,520.00 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO DELTACARE HMO - MUNICIPAL DENT 15978 2306730 478.76 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL DENTAL POO AUGUST 2023 DELTA DENTAL PPO 15979 2306729 10,509.87 08/02/23 MISSION SQUARE RET P SEPTEMBER 2023 RETIREE PAYMENT 16095 985 129,356.45 07/26/23 ZEKARIA, SION TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (FIR 4302 & FIR 16141 975 1,520.00 07/26/23 U.S. BANK N.A. PR PPE 072123 PAR DEDUCTIONS 16183 977 104.48 08/02/23 RUTH, JONATHAN TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (MAT 1301) 16320 989 760.00 08/02/23 GRAY, JASON TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (MAT 1301) 16321 983 760.00 08/02/23 O'DONNELL, SEAN TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (ENG 1301) 16322 988 795.00

TOTAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,834,474.37
23030310 CDBG CODE ENFORCEMENT
07/12/23 VERIZON WIRELESS PLNG,BLDG,CE CELL PHONES & IPADS 6/26- 15109 2306572 79.78

Page 36 ends

TOTAL CDBG CODE ENFORCEMENT 79.78

23030313 CDBG NEIGHBOORHOOD REVITA
07/12/23 ATLAS WINDOWS AND DO HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT - RHODES 15223 2306443 15,084.86 07/21/23 HCD REBATE/REFUND 15247 2306665 344.03
07/19/23 JK CONSTRUCTION HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT - LIMBACH 15381 2306615 14,000.00

TOTAL CDBG NEIGHBOORHOOD REVITA 29,428.89
23030314 CDBG OC FAIR HOUSING PROG
07/19/23 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL Public Service Agency Grants-CDBG-Per 22- 15388 2306605 1,250.00

TOTAL CDBG OC FAIR HOUSING PROG 1,250.00
23030315 CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE
07/12/23 INTERVAL HOUSE PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY GRANTS -CDBG-PER 15250 2306483 3,450.00 07/12/23 BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS O Public Service Agency Grants -CDBG-Per 22- 15304 2306447 1,725.00 07/19/23 WAYMAKERS Public Service Agency Grants-CDBG-Per 22- 15389 946 3,581.86 07/19/23 SENIOR SERVICE Public Service Agency Grants -CDBG-Per 22- 15823 2306640 1,185.50 07/19/23 SENIOR SERVICE Public Service Agency Grants -CDBG-Per 22- 15824 2306640 4,536.25

TOTAL CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE 14,478.61
23130324 FVHA AFFORDABLE
07/12/23 YOU CHECK CREDIT.COM Credit Check Liberty 14827 2306580 29.85 07/27/23 STRADLING YOCCA CARL Legal Services for affordable housing 16163 2306812 4,207.50 07/27/23 STRADLING YOCCA CARL Legal Services for affordable housing 16162 2306812 4,009.50 08/02/23 STRADLING YOCCA CARL Legal Services for affordable housing INclusionary 16327 2306892 2,178.00 08/02/23 STRADLING YOCCA CARL Legal Services for affordable housing Jasmine 16328 2306892 2,277.00

TOTAL FVHA AFFORDABLE 12,701.85
24095000 GAS TAX
07/19/23 DMS CONSULTANTS INC RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY REHAB QUAD D1 15845 2306601 750.00

TOTAL GAS TAX 750.00
24095050 PW PROJECT (OPERATING)
07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT APR 2023 16075 2306692 1,713.65 07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT MAY 2023 16077 2306692 1,815.20

TOTAL PW PROJECT (OPERATING) 3,528.85
24295001 TRAFFIC IMP
07/27/23 ILB ELECTRIC HISP 8 PP 9 4/1/2023 - 4/30/2023 15915 2306799 371,435.17 07/27/23 ILB ELECTRIC CREDIT RCO #12 TOWARDS PP #9 THROUGH 15914 2306799 (1,349.83)

TOTAL TRAFFIC IMP 370,085.34
27097001 CRIMINAL DIVERSION
07/19/23 PREMIER UNIFORMS Uniforms/Shoulder Patches/Badge Patches 15880 2306630 52,242.87

TOTAL CRIMINAL DIVERSION 52,242.87
50000000 WF NON-DEPARTMENTAL
07/19/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 6/8/23 15370 2306654 23.07 07/19/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 6/15/23 15372 2306653 38.08 07/19/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 06/12/23 15374 2306652 43.26 07/12/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 5/15/23 15149 2306570 98.76 07/12/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 6/28/23 15150 2306567 146.52 07/12/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 6/29/23 15151 2306569 27.43

Page 37 ends

07/12/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 7/6/23 15152 2306568 12.41 07/26/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 7/5/23 15982 2306783 17.79 07/26/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 7/19/23 15983 2306782 13.94 07/26/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 7/17/23 15984 2306781 12.62 07/26/23 UTILITY REFUND UTILITY REFUND - FINALED 6/5/23 15985 2306780 54.80

TOTAL WF NON-DEPARTMENTAL 488.68
50040403 WF UTILITY BILLING
07/12/23 INFOSEND, INC UTILITY BILL PRINTING - MAY 2023 14148 2306482 5,339.56 07/19/23 INFOSEND, INC UTILITY BILL PRINTING - JUNE 2023 15378 2306613 4,887.88

TOTAL WF UTILITY BILLING 10,227.44
50050570 WF WTR PROD. OPNS
07/19/23 VERIZON WIRELESS WATER CELL PHONE-5/26/23-6/25/23 15347 2306657 860.44 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 236.58 08/02/23 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. UNION SLIP FOR #11 MIOX 15902 2306867 29.82 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 21.68 07/12/23 TESCO CONTROLS INC EMASS SERVICE CONTRACT 15215 2306564 470.00 07/12/23 TESCO CONTROLS INC EMASS EMERGENCY SUPPORT SERVICES FOR 15216 2306564 470.00 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST JUNE 2023 - IMPORT WATER 15884 2306731 6,288.41 07/27/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO RESERVOIRS WELLS ELECTRICITY BILL 5/3/23 - 16006 2306807 70,252.75 08/02/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO RESERVOIRS & WELLS ELECTRICITY 06/07/23 - 16270 2306871 93,776.78 07/12/23 GRAINGER, INC. WELL PUMP PACKING 15204 2306473 373.65 07/19/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST FY23-24 ANNUAL METER CHARGE 15212 2306624 228,775.36 07/19/23 ORANGE COUNTY WATER OCWD WELL RPLNSHMNT JAN-JUN 2023 15427 937 1,961,370.00 07/27/23 WILLIAMS, LANDON V DISTRIBUTION CERTIFICATION FOR L.W. 16061 981 90.00

TOTAL WF WTR PROD. OPNS 2,363,015.47
50050571 WF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
07/19/23 UNDERGROUND SERVICE USA REGS 15804 2306648 79.33 07/19/23 UNDERGROUND SERVICE USA DIG TICKETS 15805 2306648 227.00 07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT APR 2023 16075 2306692 1,713.65 07/12/23 INFOSEND, INC UTILITY BILL PRINTING - MAY 2023 14148 2306482 84.27 07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT MAY 2023 16077 2306692 1,815.17 07/12/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST MAY 2023 TURF REMOVAL & S2D 15093 2306502 222.00 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 26.22 07/19/23 INFOSEND, INC UTILITY BILL PRINTING - JUNE 2023 15378 2306613 68.35 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST JUNE 2023 - TURF REMOVAL & S2D 16069 2306733 333.00 07/19/23 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES PIEZO TUBE ASSY 15808 2306606 72.32 07/12/23 NGUYEN, DANNY 15264 2306503 1,651.27
07/19/23 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY LOCKS AND KEYS 15332 2306616 1,543.25 07/19/23 YO FIRE REED FLARE TOOL 15333 2306664 304.50
07/19/23 YO FIRE VALVE AND AIRVAC CAN 15334 2306664 3,259.24 08/02/23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAIN PAINT 16175 2306826 256.38 07/19/23 YO FIRE REPAIR CLAMPS 15807 2306664 1,540.17
07/19/23 YO FIRE PARTS AND MATERIAL 15806 2306664 3,340.64 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST WATER LOSS CONTROL TECHNICAL ASST 16021 2306732 10,120.00 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST WATER LOSS CONTROL SHARED SERVICES 16024 2306731 28,210.00

Page 38 ends

08/02/23 YO FIRE PIPE PARTS 16172 2306888 32.36
08/04/23 REFUND ONE-TIME PARTIAL REFUND: 16067 2306894 1,651.27

TOTAL WF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 56,550.39
50050572 WF WTR QUAL & TREATMENT
07/19/23 SWEETNER PROD SALT TO MAKE CHLORINE 15296 2306643 1,867.73 08/02/23 USA BLUE BOOK FLUORIDE STANDARDS 16174 2306882 999.64 08/02/23 USA BLUE BOOK CHEMICAL REAGENTS 16177 2306882 363.23

TOTAL WF WTR QUAL & TREATMENT 3,230.60
50050573 WF CUSTOMER SERVICE
07/19/23 UNITED RENTALS NORTH HARD HAT FOR COUNSIL 15335 2306649 106.50 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 6.54

TOTAL WF CUSTOMER SERVICE 113.04
50050574 WF METER M & R
07/12/23 NGUYEN, DANNY 15264 2306503 182.47
08/02/23 KEN'S LOCKSMITHERY KEYS/KEY RINGS 16173 2306838 56.30 07/26/23 MUNICIPAL WATER DIST WATER LOSS CONTROL SHARED SERVICES 16024 2306731 22,246.00 08/04/23 REFUND ONE-TIME PARTIAL REFUND: 16067 2306894 182.47

TOTAL WF METER M & R 22,667.24
50095001 WATER FUND
08/02/23 RICHARD C. SLADE & A WELL 10 BID SUPPORT APRIL 2023 16084 2306861 5,821.50 07/27/23 RICHARD C. SLADE & A WELL 10 BID SUPPORT MAY 2023 16085 2306804 1,460.63 08/02/23 RICHARD C. SLADE & A WELL 10 BID SUPPORT JUNE 2023 16086 2306861 3,548.55

TOTAL WATER FUND 10,830.68
50150580 SF SEWER MAINTENANCE
07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT APR 2023 16075 2306692 1,713.65 07/26/23 BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTU GIS OPERATION & MAINT MAY 2023 16077 2306692 1,815.17 07/26/23 AT&T MOBILITY VARIOUS CELL BILLS (MAY 27-JUN 26) 15393 2306671 33.62 07/12/23 CINTAS CORPORATION 6 UNIFORM RENTAL (6/29/23) 15003 2306451 8.77 08/02/23 SO CALIF EDISON CO SEWER LIFT STATION ELECTRICITY 6/13/23 - 16170 2306868 432.87 07/26/23 GRAINGER, INC. WINCH BAG 15899 2306711 273.73
08/02/23 ROOTX TOLL FOR BOOT APPLICATOR 16235 2306864 298.05 08/02/23 GRAINGER, INC. MISC SEWER SUPPLIES 16310 2306836 562.46

TOTAL SF SEWER MAINTENANCE 5,138.32
50250590 SWF SOLID WASTE
07/21/23 REPUBLIC SERVICES, I RUBBISH HAULING - JUNE 2023 15912 2306666 366,560.43

TOTAL SWF SOLID WASTE 366,560.43
60030301 CUSTODIAL - BLDG SAFETY
07/26/23 CALIFORNIA BUILDING SB1473 GREEN BUILDING FEES 2ND QTR 2023 15976 2306693 1,126.00 08/02/23 DEPARTMENT OF CONSER SMIP FEES 4TH QUARTER 2023 16250 2306825 3,771.82

TOTAL CUSTODIAL - BLDG SAFETY 4,897.82

TOTAL $13,275,975.60

Page 39 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approve a Contract Amendment with Dr. Lawrence Richman Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In December of 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Dr. Lawrence Richman for medical review of the legal case involving the City and Randall Auster.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Fountain Valley executed a retainer agreement with Dr. Richman in order to receive a clearer understanding of the medical issues in the recently settled litigation with Randall Auster. As that case has now been settled, a final invoice for Dr. Richman’s services was received for a total of $7,488.86. The initial contract with Dr. Richman was to not exceed $50,000, of which $48,000 had been encumbered to date. Therefore, staff is requesting a contract amendment to increase Dr. Richman’s agreement by $5,488.86, so that he may be paid in full for his services.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The remaining balance of $5,488.86 that is needed to pay for the services of Dr. Richman will be paid from account Number 114.00.00411.54003, which has sufficient funds to cover the amount requested.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

Page 40 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

There was no attorney review needed for this action.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative 1. Approve the contract amendment of $5,488.86.

Alternative 2. Do not approve the contract amendment of $5,488.86 and provide staff with direction.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is recommending that council approve the contract amendment increase to Dr.

Richman’s contract in the amount of $5,488.86.

Prepared by: Rick Miller, City Clerk
Fiscal review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager

Page 41 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to increase contract amount and extend the term for Consultant Services Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates for as-needed plan review services
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Attract and retain revenue producing businesses
☐ Achieve fiscal stability in accordance with the 20-Year Financial Plan ☐ Attract and retain quality staff
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On July 20, 2021, the City Council approved a Consultant Services Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (“CAA”) to provide professional Building Division Services to the City.

This agreement was necessary to help the Building Division transition to in-house staff, backfill the two (2) open vacant positions during recruitment, structural plan review services and to continue use of the permit/code enforcement software system. The Agreement’s term was a “not to exceed” amount of $338,870 for the FY 2021-22. This agreement had a one-year term that expired on July 20, 2022. The City Manager authorized and signed Amendment No. 1 to extend the term of the agreement for one year until July 20, 2023 with no increase to total contract sum.

Staff has issued an RFP to identify the best firm to assist the City with its Building Department related needs. This includes structural plan check, the use of a land management software system and on-call staffing as needed. Staff is recommending a six-month extension to the agreement and an additional $50,000 in funding for on-going structural plan review services and to ensure uninterrupted customer service during this RFP process.

DISCUSSION:

On July 20, 2021, the City Council awarded a total not-to-exceed contract in the amount of $338, 870 to cover full-time staffing (permit technician, building inspection) until positions are filled, permit software, and on-call staffing for plan review services. The two (2) vacant staff

Page 42 ends

Subject
Date of Council Meeting

Page 2 ends

positions were filled by December 2021, the temporary aspects of that part of the contract was no longer necessary. The remaining funds from the “not-to-exceed” total was used to cover the annual cost for the permit/code enforcement software and structural plan review services.

As of July 2023, the balance of the contract is exhausted and contract term is expiring.

In July of 2023 the City of Fountain Valley Community Development Department circulated a Request of Proposal (RFP) to seek bids to provide plan review services and on-call staffing service for the Building Division on an as-needed basis. Proposals are due to the City on August 9, 2023 and staff expects the total evaluation and selection process to be completed by September of this year. As such, Staff is requesting the contract extension to continue with uninterrupted services during this time.

FISCAL REVIEW:

While the total contract amount would be increased by $50,000 to $388,870, the necessary funds for these additional professional services have been budgeted in the FY 2023-24 budget and are available in Account No. 100.30.30301.53003 for this amendment request.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not Applicable
ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney(s) for the City has reviewed this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the attached contract with Charles Abbott Associates, for plan review services, for a not-to-exceed amount of $50,000 and a six-month extension, as-needed for plan review services.

Alternative No. 2:

RECOMMENDATION:

Do not approved the attached contract amendment and direct staff to take an alternate action.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1.

Prepared by: Darik Doggett, Building Official
Reviewed by: Omar Dadabhoy, Community Development Director Fiscal review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager

Page 43 ends

Subject
Date of Council Meeting

Page 3 ends

Attachments:

1. Agreement for Consultant Services, Con-21-33

2. Amendment No. 1 to Con-21-33

3. Amendment No. 2 to Con-21-33

Page 44 ends

Attachment No. 1

Page 45 ends

Page 46 ends

Page 47 ends

Page 48 ends

Page 49 ends

Page 50 ends

Page 51 ends

Page 52 ends

Page 53 ends

Page 54 ends

Page 55 ends

Page 56 ends

Page 57 ends

Page 58 ends

Page 59 ends

Page 60 ends

Page 61 ends

Page 62 ends

Page 63 ends

Page 64 ends

Page 65 ends

Page 66 ends

Page 67 ends

Page 68 ends

Page 69 ends

Page 70 ends

Page 71 ends

Page 72 ends

Page 73 ends

Page 74 ends

Page 75 ends

Page 76 ends

Page 77 ends

Page 78 ends

Page 79 ends

Attachment No. 2

Page 80 ends

Page 81 ends

AMENDMENT NO. 2
CON-21-33

AS-NEEDED BUILDING DEPARTMENT SERVICES
This SECOND AMENDMENT to CON-21-33 is made and entered into this ___ day of August, 2023, by and between the City of Fountain Valley (hereinafter “CITY”), a municipal corporation, and Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”), a California corporation.

Recitals
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR previously entered into Agreement for AsNeeded Building Department Services Con 21-33 dated July 20, 2021 (“AGREEMENT”); WHEREAS, the AGREEMENT was for a not-to-exceed TOTAL CONTRACT SUM of $338,870.00 and expired on July 20, 2022;
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR entered into Amendment No.1 to the AGREEMENT on July 21, 2022 to extend the AGREEMENT until and including July 20, 2023; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR desire to extend the AGREEMENT, as amended, for an additional six months, until January 20, 2024, and provide additional compensation to CONTRACTOR in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto AGREE as follows:

1. The AGREEMENT, as amended, shall be extended for six months, ending on January 20, 2024.

2. The TOTAL CONTRACT SUM shall be increased by an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for the remaining TERM of the AGREEMENT.

3. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have entered into this SECOND AMENDMENT the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
___________________________ ___________________________ Rick Miller, City Clerk Kim Constantine, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR:

HARPER & BURNS LLP
___________________________ ___________________________ Attorneys for the City Owner

Page 82 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: City of Fountain Valley Six Month Strategic Objectives Adoption for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☒ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☒ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☒ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On May 11, 2023 the City Council held a strategic planning session with executive management team and department managers. Those that were in attendance collaborated to establish the City’s vision and mission statements, three-year goals and six-month strategic planning objectives for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023 for adoption. The strategic plan has and will continue to serve as a guideline for both the Council and City staff as we work to achieve our goals over the next few years.

The Strategic Plan goals on the attached spreadsheet have been updated so that the City Council can see the progress that has been made on the action items.

DISCUSSION:

During the City’s Strategic Planning session on May 11, 2023, City Council, executive management team including department managers discussed achievements and missed opportunities. There were group discussions that led to the creation of the City’s vision and mission statements.

The City of Fountain Valley vision statement is:

Fountain Valley is a safe, inclusive, and desirable community where you can live your best life! The City of Fountain Valley mission statement is:

The City of Fountain Valley is a team driven organization committed to providing excellent service to our community through our Core Values: Fiscal Stability, Honesty, Integrity and Ethical Behavior, Teamwork, Innovation, Quality of Life, and Excellent Customer Service.

Page 83 ends

City of Fountain Valley Strategic Plan
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

Through the collaborative efforts, City Council and City staff help clearly define the goals and priorities of the City in which a finalized Six Month Strategic Objectives Matrix for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023 was prepared for adoption.

The recommended 2023-2026 goals were agreed upon and are not in any priority:
 Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live”  Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
 Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends  Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City City Council and City staff prepared the six-month objectives in support of the new goals for 2023-2026.

These objectives and staff’s progress toward achieving them are attached for your reference under Attachment No. 1.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The fiscal impact has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2023-24.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

Attorney for the City has reviewed this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Adopt the vision and mission statements, six-month strategic objectives matrix for May 11, 2023 through November 16, 2023.

Alternative No. 2: Direct staff to take an alternate action.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1.

Prepared by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Reviewed by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Colin Burns, Attorney for the City
Attachment:

1. Six Month Strategic Objectives Matrix for May 11, 2023 – November 16, 2023

Page 84 ends

C I T Y O F F O U N T A I N V A L L E Y

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
M a y 1 1 , 2 0 2 3 – N o v e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 2 3
City of Fountain Valley Vision Statement
Fountain Valley is a safe, inclusive, and desirable community where you can live your best life! City of Fountain Valley Mission Statement
The City of Fountain Valley is a team driven organization committed to providing excellent service to our community through our core values.

Core Values
Fiscal Stability, Honesty, Integrity and Ethical Behavior, Teamwork, Innovation, Quality of Life, and Excellent Customer Service THREE-YEAR GOAL: ENHANCE THE CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT OF “A NICE PLACE TO LIVE”

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGET

1. By August 15,
2023, City
Council meeting
Police Chief and Finance
Director
Review and present options to solicitor/peddler city
ordinance. X
N/A To be Presented at an
August 15, 2023 Council
Study Session.

2. By June 6, 2023,
City Council
meeting
Police Chief
Facilitate a new contract for unhoused outreach and
engagement. X
N/A
Contract Approved by
City Council

3. By August 1,
2023
Community Services
Director/City Clerk/Deputy
City Manager
Present to City Manager a unified messaging platform
to help brand public facing information.

X $9,000 New City logo has been
created and included in
updated website. Brand
identity and style guide
are currently being
created by consultant.

4. By September
19, 2023, City
Council Meeting
Community Services Director
and City Clerk
Present to City Council for direction a proposal for a
robust and professional community survey on the
quality of services in Fountain Valley.

X $30,000 Staff are currently
collecting quotes for a
Community Survey.

Page 85 ends

B
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ACHIEVE FISCAL STABILITY BY EVALUATING PROCESSES, AND ATTRACT

AND RETAIN REVENUE PRODUCING BUSINESSES/OPPORTUNITIES

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGET

1. By September 19,
City Council meeting
Deputy City
Manager/Community
Development Director
Complete and present Economic Development plan
update. X
In budget Draft presented to City
Council on July 18,
2023. Currently under
revision based on
comments received.

2. By November 7,
2023, City Council
meeting
Deputy City
Manager/Community
Development Director
Complete the Crossings Specific Plan rebranding. X In budget Working with consultant on finalizing
some options.

3. By October 3, 2023,
City Council meeting
Finance Director Identify facilities in need of major repair or replacement and place in a newly created fund.

X N/A

4. By August 1, 2023
Finance Director Retain services of a consultant to conduct a fee study and present to the City Manager.

X In budget Contract under review
to retain the services
of Wildan Group.

5..

By October 3, 2023
Deputy City
Manager/Community
Development Director
Retain services of a consultant to identify surplus land for possible hotels and present to City Manager. X
In budget Contract under review
to retain the services
of Kosmont Realty,

Page 86 ends

C
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALITY STAFF THROUGH

BEST PRACTICES AND TRENDS

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGE
T
REVIS
ED
BUDGET

1. By June 6,
2023, City
Council
Meeting
Cross City Committee
with
Oversite/Assistance
From Fire Chief and
HR Director
Present results from Engagement Team – Increase
Engagement of staff for teambuilding, equity, inclusion, retention, and morale.

X
$25,000 Completed in study
session

2. By June 6,
2023, City
Council
meeting
HR Director-lead,
Community Services
Director, Police Chief,
Public Works
Director, Fire Chief
Staff to identify creative solutions and options to address the current trends in workforce and labor market that are having a negative impact on recruitment and retention efforts.

X Completed in study
session

3. By June 6,
2023, City
Council
meeting
PW Director-lead,
Community Services
Director, HR Director,
Police Chief, and IT
Director
Present to City Council suggested improvements to the
hiring and on-boarding process.

X $10,000/annu
ally
IT and HR are working
to implement Neo-Gov
onboarding software
and single sign-on.

Completed in study
session

4. By December
5, 2023
City Council
meeting
HR Director,
Community Services
Director and
Engagement Team
Present and bring forward top trends in workforce and labor market for approval and adoption. X

5. By July 31,
2023,
Council
Communicator
HR Director-lead and
Engagement Team
Conduct survey to identify enhancements to employee
benefits and provide to Council in the Council
Communicator.

X Provided in the first
Council Communicator
in August 2023.

Page 87 ends

D
THREE-YEAR GOAL: MAINTAIN, BUILD, AND MODERNIZE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT

GROWTH AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE CITY

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS

DONE ON
TARGET
REVISE
D
BUDGE
T

1. By September 16,
2023, City Council
meeting
Public Works Director
and Deputy Public
Works Director
Present the status of 405 Fwy Project. X Done: OCTA
provided an update
on June 6, 2023
City Council
Meeting.

2. By October 17, 2023,
City Council meeting
IT Director Present the status of Office 365 and new servers-Nutanix.

X
IT is on schedule to
finish the O365
email migration and
Server migration to
Nutanix.

3. By October 17, 2023
City Council meeting
Public Works Director
and Deputy Public
Works Director
Present the status of fiber optics phase one.

X On Target

4. By July 20, 2023
Deputy City
Manager/Interim
Public Works
Director/Fire Chief
Secure property, close escrow and initiate RFP for design, explore and identify revenue sources for 17101 Bushard
property.

X We closed escrow,
the RFP has been
posted, the
property has been
secured with
fencing and
cameras, and
revenue sources
are being evaluated
both internally and
through the RFP.

5. By October 17, 2023,
City Council meeting
Deputy City
Manager/Community
Development Director
Present General Plan update and EIR adoption. X Documents currently circulated
for public review
and Study Session
with Planning
Commission held
on July 12, 2023.

Page 88 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: 1) Waive the bidding requirements pursuant to FVMC 2.36.070 Par 4 and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs for $64,728.55 through the existing cooperative contract with Sourcewell; and
2) Authorize staff to dispose of the existing vehicles by means that best meet the City’s needs
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☒ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Recently, the Police Department reevaluated the fleet of vehicles assigned to the Investigations Unit in FY 2023-24. Two (2) vehicles due for replacement after 15 years of use are Unit 124, a 2008 Ford Fusion, and Unit 126, a 2008 Ford Escape. The FY 2023-24 Fleet Management Capital Program has allocated $80,000 to cover the cost of replacing these vehicles.

After evaluating the needs of the Police Department, Fleet Management staff and Police Management staff recommend purchasing two (2) 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs to replace the Ford vehicles. The interior design of the Trailblazer provides better versatility and increased storage space to transport large quantities of property frequently seized at crime scenes.

Utilizing an existing cooperative contract through Sourcewell, the total cost to purchase two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs to replace Units 124 and 126 is $64,728.55. There is sufficient funding in the account for the purchase.

Page 89 ends

Purchase of Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

Staff is requesting that City Council 1) waive the bidding requirements pursuant to FVMC

2.36.070 Par 4 and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs for $64,728.55 through the existing cooperative contract with Sourcewell; and 2) authorize staff to dispose of the existing vehicles by means that best meet the City’s needs.

DISCUSSION:

As part of the FY 2023-24 Annual Operating Budget and Ten-Year Capital Replacement Program adopted by City Council, $80,000 was budgeted for the replacement of two (2) vehicles assigned to the Investigations Unit of the Police Department. The vehicles scheduled for replacement are Unit 124, a 2008 Ford Fusion with a total of 57,482 miles, and Unit 126, a 2008 Ford Escape with a total of 58,048 miles.

Based on the condition of the Ford vehicles scheduled for replacement in FY 2023-24 and the needs of the Police Department, staff is recommending that the City use its allocation to replace these vehicles with Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs. Both of these vehicles are 15 years old and the fleet would benefit from having SUVs, in addition to sedans, in order to support undercover and surveillance officer operations without being identified as law enforcement.

Furthermore, the interior design of the Trailblazer provides better versatility and increased storage space to transport large quantities of bulk property frequently seized at crime scenes and suppression operations. Finally, the Trailblazer provides an elevated seating position that is more efficient in maintaining visibility of vehicles in heavy traffic during surveillance operations.

Staff has identified an existing cooperative contract through Sourcewell, formerly the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA), that can be used for the purchase of these vehicles. Sourcewell combines the buying power of 50,000 government, education, and nonprofit organizations through nationally, competitively solicited cooperative contracts. Cooperative purchasing is “Procurement conducted by, or on behalf of, one or more Public Procurement Units” as defined by the American Bar Association Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments.

Sourcewell’s rigorous process streamlines the procurement process by developing Invitation for Bids and Request for Proposals for national, competitive solicitations that meet or exceed local requirements. Sourcewell issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) in July 2021 for the procurement of automobiles, SUVs, vans, and light trucks with related equipment and accessories. The RFP was publicly advertised. Thirteen proposals were received in September 2021 and were evaluated based on eight criteria with pricing being the most heavily weighted.

Based on that process, National Auto Fleet Group was the highest ranked and awarded a cooperative contract (Contract #091521-NAF) by Sourcewell. The City can utilize the cooperative contract with National Auto Fleet Group through Sourcewell to purchase the vehicles at a competitive price in compliance with the City’s purchasing policy.

Section 2.36.070 Par 4 of the Fountain Valley Municipal Code authorizes the procurement of goods and services without formal bidding under the following circumstance: “When participating in cooperative contracts with another government agency.” Utilizing the existing cooperative contract through Sourcewell, the total cost to purchase two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs to replace Units 124 and 126 is $64,728.55.

Page 90 ends

Purchase of Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs
August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

Purchasing the new Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs will support the City’s strategic goals of enhancing the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” and attracting and retaining quality staff. Purchasing these vehicles as scheduled decreases vehicle downtime, increases fleet diversity and enhances community and officer safety. New SUVs and the modern equipment they are outfitted with provide detectives with the tools needed to continue effectively serving and protecting the community.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The FY 2023-24 Fleet Management Capital Program provides a total of $80,000 for the replacement of two (2) police vehicles in the Investigations Unit.

Fleet Management Fund
Police Department
ISF – Fleet Capital – PD Passenger Cars (112.70.70052.55544) FY 2023/24 Available Budget $ 80,000.00
2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUV – Qty. 2 ($32,364.28 each) $ 64,728.55* *Includes sales tax and tire fees
The total cost to purchase two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs is $64,728.55. After the purchase of the two (2) SUVs, there will be $15,271.45 remaining in the account which will be used for outfitting both vehicles.

There are sufficient funds to purchase the requested police vehicles.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

This does not require the Attorneys for the City review or approval. This action will be issued on a City approved purchase order form that provides standard terms and conditions which have been approved by the Attorneys for the City.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: 1) Waive the bidding requirements pursuant to FVMC 2.36.070 Par 4 and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs for $64,728.55 through the existing cooperative contract with Sourcewell; and 2) authorize staff to dispose of the existing vehicles by means that best meet the City’s needs. This is the recommended action.

Page 91 ends

Purchase of Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs
August 15, 2023

Page 4 ends

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve the proposal to purchase the Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs through the cooperative contract and direct staff to obtain multiple quotes for the vehicles. This is not recommended as the cost under the cooperative contract is competitive and provides the best value to the City.

All Sourcewell contracts have been competitively solicited nationally and also save considerable staff time and effort over individual requests and specifications with various vendors to meet our procurement needs.

Alternative No. 3: Do not authorize the purchase of the Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs at this time, and defer and direct staff to return at a future date with an update on the condition of the existing vehicles. This is not recommended, as these vehicles should be replaced now due to their age and condition.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 to 1) waive the bidding requirements pursuant to FVMC 2.36.070 Par 4 and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two (2) new 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer SUVs for $64,728.55 through the existing cooperative contract with Sourcewell; and 2) authorize staff to dispose of the existing vehicles by means that best meet the City’s needs.

Prepared by: Ron Rothstain, Management Aide
Reviewed by: Mark Sprague, Field Services Manager
Approved by: Stephen Drinovsky, Interim Director of Public Works Fiscal review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachment:

1. Quote

Page 92 ends

Page 93 ends

Page 94 ends

Page 95 ends

Page 96 ends

Page 97 ends

Page 98 ends

Page 99 ends

Page 100 ends

Page 101 ends

Page 102 ends

Page 103 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities to extend the contract term two years and increase the annual contract amount by 3.22% in the first year and by an additional 3.25% in the second year of the extension Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☒ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☒ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City’s current contract (CON-19-54) with DMS Facility Services LLC (DMS) for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities will expire on September 30, 2023.

Per the terms of the contract, the City has the option to renew the contract, with contractor concurrence, for three (3) additional two-year periods on the same terms and conditions.

Amendment No. 1 to CON-19-54 extended the contract for the first two-year period on September 21, 2021.

Public Works staff has managed the work performed by DMS over the past four (4) years of the contract and has been satisfied with their performance. After considering the City’s historical Request for Proposal results, current economic conditions, and the service provided by DMS, Public Works staff thinks that it is in the best interest of the City to renew the existing contract. Therefore, staff wishes to extend the contract for a second two-year period through September 30, 2025.

Per the terms of the contract, DMS has agreed to extend the contract through September 30, 2025, and has requested an annual contract amount increase of 3.22% ($12,805.48) in the

Page 104 ends

Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

first year and an additional increase of 3.25% ($13,353.00) in the second year of the extension.

This averages out to a 4.9% increase, which is less than the 11.4% Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increase from June 2021 to June 2023.

Staff is requesting that the City Council approve Amendment No. to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities to extend the contract term two years and increase the annual contract amount by 3.22% in the first year and by an additional 3.25% in the second year of the extension.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Fountain Valley utilizes contract janitorial services to maintain City offices and facilities in a clean, sanitary and aesthetically pleasing condition.

In 2019, Public Works staff developed and issued a comprehensive request for proposal (RFP) that detailed the scope of work for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities. In addition to general janitorial services at 12 City facilities, twice-weekly trash porter service at the Sports Park and regularly scheduled carpet cleaning at five (5) buildings, the scope of work included increased vacuuming and carpet cleaning services to properly maintain and extend the life of the new carpet installed at the Senior Center, City Hall and the Corporation Yard, as well as annual deep cleaning services at Fire Station Nos. 1 and 2.

On August 12, 2019, the City received four (4) proposals in response to the competitive RFP.

After City staff carefully evaluated the proposals to determine which contractor would provide the best value to the City, City Council awarded a contract (CON-19-54) to DMS Facility Services LLC (DMS) in the annual amount of $378,466 on September 17, 2019. The term of the contract commenced on October 1, 2019, and continued through September 30, 2021.

Per the terms of the contract, the City has the option to renew the contract with contractor concurrence, for three (3) additional two-year periods on the same terms and conditions.

On September 21, 2021, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to CON-19-54 which extended the contract term two (2) years through September 30, 2023, and increased the annual contract amount by 2.29% ($8,652.49) in the first year and by an additional 2.74% ($10,621.03) in the second year of the extension. Amendment No. 1 also adjusted the scope of work for the floor care in Halls A, B and C at the Senior Center and amended the hours during which the twice weekly trash can porter service at the Recreation Center and Sports Park occur.

The current term of the contract will expire on September 30, 2023.

After considering the City’s historical Request for Proposal results, current economic conditions, and the service provided by DMS, Public Works staff thinks that it is in the best interest of the City to renew the existing contract. Public Works staff has managed all of the work performed by DMS over the past four (4) years and has been satisfied with their performance. Therefore, staff wishes to extend the contract for a second two-year period through September 30, 2025.

Page 105 ends

Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54
August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

DMS has agreed to extend the contract through September 30, 2025, and has requested an annual contract amount increase of 3.22% ($12,805.48) in the first year and an additional increase of 3.25% ($13,353.00) in the second year of the extension. This averages out to a

4.9% increase which is less than the 11.4% Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increase from June 2021 to June 2023.

Per the terms of the contract, the compensation terms may be adjusted by a mutually agreeable amount based on and no greater than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA changes over the previous contract period. The June CPI data is released mid-July, making it the most recent data available to the Contractor prior to submitting their CPI adjustment request in writing to the City sixty days before the end of the then-current contract period as required by the contract.

The scope of work will remain the same.

Continuing to provide janitorial services supports the City’s strategic goals of enhancing the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live”, and attracting and retaining quality staff by maintaining City offices and facilities in a clean, sanitary and aesthetically pleasing condition so they can be utilized and enjoyed by both the community and staff. Ongoing janitorial services also supports the City’s strategic goal of maintaining infrastructure to support growth and future needs by extending the usable life of building fixtures by properly maintaining them.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The annual cost of the amended contract is $410,545.00 in year one and $423,898.00 in year two of the extension. The cost of the contract will be expensed to Government Buildings Service Contract accounts within the General Fund based on the facility being serviced as detailed below.

Annual Contract Cost Comparison
Facility – Account # Current
Annual Cost
Eff. Oct. 1, 2022
Ext. Year 1
Annual Cost
Eff. Oct. 1, 2023
Ext. Year 2
Annual Cost
Eff. Oct. 1, 2024
City Hall – 111.10.10000.53010
Janitorial Services $ 40,175.16 $ 41,448.00 $ 42,792.00 Carpet Cleaning $ 2,069.26 $ 2,136.00 $ 2,206.00
Corporation Yard – 111.50.50000.53010
Janitorial Services $ 32,405.88 $ 33,456.00 $ 34,548.00 Carpet Cleaning $ 432.44 $ 446.00 $ 460.00
Police Facility – 111.70.70000.53010
Janitorial Services $ 83,530.08 $ 86,256.00 $ 89,064.00 Carpet Cleaning $ 1,513.58 $ 1,562.00 $ 1,612.00
Recreation Center – 111.80.80000.53010
Janitorial Services $ 57,784.32 $ 59,640.00 $ 61,584.00 Carpet Cleaning $ 216.22 $ 224.00 $ 232.00
Sports Park Outbuildings – 111.80.80000.53010
Janitorial Services $114,994.20 $118,668.00 $122,520.00

Page 106 ends

Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54
August 15, 2023

Page 4 ends

Senior Center – 111.80.80001.53010
Janitorial Services $ 57,048.12 $ 58,884.00 $ 60,792.00 Carpet Cleaning $ 702.74 $ 726.00 $ 750.00
Los Alamos Park Restrooms – 111.80.80001.53010
Janitorial Services $ 4,759.32 $ 4,908.00 $ 5,076.00
Fire Station #1 – 111.60.60001.53010
Annual Deep Cleaning $ 1,200.05 $ 1,239.00 $ 1,279.00
Fire Station #2 – 111.60.60002.53010
Annual Deep Cleaning $ 908.15 $ 952.00 $ 983.00
Annual Contract Total $397,739.52 $410,545.00 $423,898.00 Amount of Increase $ 12,805.48 $ 13,353.00
Percentage Increase 3.22% 3.25%
The full financial impact of the amended contract is $834,443.00 for the two-year term.

FY 2023-24 Financial Impact
The current adopted budget for FY 2023-24 allocates $437,050.00 for janitorial services at City offices and facilities. This budget allocation was an estimate based upon the current janitorial contract and projected increases per the terms of the contract.

After factoring in the cost of janitorial services for July – September 2023 based on the current contract pricing and the cost of janitorial services for October 2023 – June 2024 based on DMS’s requested rate increase as reflected in Amendment No. 2, the total financial impact of CON-19-54 in FY 2023-24 will be $407,404.27. Therefore, there are sufficient funds in the FY 2023-24 budget to accommodate Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54.

Facility
Account #
July – Sept
2023 Costs
Oct 2023 –
June 2024
Costs
(Amend. 2)
FY 2023/24
Total Costs
FY 2023/24
Budget
City Hall & Council Chambers
111.10.10000.53010
$ 10,043.79 $ 33,222.00 $ 43,265.79 $ 46,450.00
Corporation Yard
111.50.50000.53010
$ 8,101.47 $ 25,538.00 $ 33,639.47 $ 36,100.00
Police Facility
111.70.70000.53010
$ 20,882.52 $ 66,254.00 $ 87,136.52 $ 93,450.00
Recreation Center / Sports Park
111.80.80000.53010
$ 43,194.63 $133,955.00 $177,149.63 $189,925.00
Senior Center / Los Alamos
Park Restrooms
111.80.80001.53010
$ 15,451.86 $ 48,570.00 $ 64,021.86 $ 68,700.00
Fire Station No. 1
111.60.60001.53010
$ 0.00 $ 1,239.00 $ 1,239.00 $ 1,375.00
Fire Station No. 2
111.60.60002.53010
$ 0.00 $ 952.00 $ 952.00 $ 1,050.00

Page 107 ends

Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54
August 15, 2023

Page 5 ends

Total $ 97,674.27 $309,730.00 $407,404.27 $437,050.00
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City has reviewed and approved Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities to extend the contract term two years and increase the annual contract amount by 3.22% in the first year and by an additional

3.25% in the second year of the extension. This is the
recommended action.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC, and direct staff to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP). This is not recommended as staff has been satisfied with the quality, cost-effectiveness and overall efficiency of the janitorial services provided by DMS. The cost increase requested by DMS is modest and staff believes that issuing an RFP would result in higher costs to the City given current economic conditions and the City’s historical RFP results.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 to approve Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54 with DMS Facility Services LLC for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities to extend the contract term two years and increase the annual contract amount by 3.22% in the first year and by an additional 3.25% in the second year of the extension.

Prepared by: Christine Smith, Senior Management Analyst Reviewed by: Mark Sprague, Field Services Manager
Approved by: Stephen Drinovsky, Interim Public Works Director Fiscal review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachment:

1. Amendment No. 2 to CON-19-54

Page 108 ends

AMENDMENT NO. 2
CON-19-54

JANITORIAL SERVICES AT CITY OFFICES & FACILITIES
This SECOND AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT CON-19-54 is made and entered into this 15th day of August, 2023, by and between the City of Fountain Valley (hereinafter “CITY”), a municipal corporation, and DMS Facility Services LLC (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”), a California corporation.

Recitals
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR previously entered into AGREEMENT CON-19-54 dated September 17, 2019, for Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities (hereinafter “AGREEMENT”) by which the CONTRACTOR shall provide janitorial services outlined in the AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, the original term of the AGREEMENT commenced on October 1, 2019 and continued through September 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the AGREEMENT provides the option for CITY to renew the AGREEMENT, with CONTRACTOR concurrence, for three (3) additional two-year periods on the same terms and conditions as the original AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the parties executed Amendment No. 1 to extend the AGREEMENT for an additional two-year period through September 30, 2023; provide an increase of 2.29% ($8,652.49) to the annual contract amount in the first year of the extension from October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022, and an additional increase of 2.74% ($10,621.03) in the second year of the extension from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023; adjust the scope of work for the floor care in Halls A, B and C at the Senior Center; and amend the hours for the twice weekly trash can porter service at the Recreation Center and Sports Park.

WHEREAS, the current term of the AGREEMENT will expire on September 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been satisfied with the performance of the CONTRACTOR and wishes to extend the AGREEMENT for a second two-year period through September 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR has requested, in accordance with the AGREEMENT, an increase of 3.22% to the annual contract amount, which is an increase of TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIVE AND 48/100 DOLLARS ($12,805.48), in the first year of the extension from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024; and an additional increase of 3.25% to the annual contract amount, which is an additional increase of THIRTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($13,353.00), in the second year of the extension from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025, as reflected in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and

Page 109 ends

WHEREAS, the total annual AGREEMENT amount shall be FOUR HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($410,545.00) for the 12-month period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024; and FOUR

HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($423,898.00) for the 12-month period from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto AGREE as follows:

1. The AGREEMENT shall be extended for a second two-year period, ending on September 30, 2025.

2. The annual contract amount shall be increased by TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIVE AND 48/100 DOLLARS
($12,805.48), in the first year of the extension from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024; and increased by an additional

THIRTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE AND
00/100 DOLLARS ($13,353.00), in the second year of the extension from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025.

3. The total annual AGREEMENT amount shall be FOUR HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE AND 00/100
DOLLARS ($410,545.00) for the 12-month period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024; and FOUR HUNDRED TWENTYTHREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($423,898.00) for the 12-month period from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025.

4. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have entered into this SECOND AMENDMENT the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
___________________________ ___________________________ Rick Miller, City Clerk Kim Constantine, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR:

HARPER & BURNS LLP
___________________________ ___________________________ Attorneys for the City Owner

Page 110 ends

Exhibit A

Page 111 ends

COST ANALYSIS FOR CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
July 17th, 2023

Page 112 ends

2 Date: July 17th, 2023
To: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
Purchasing Officer
10200 Slater Ave.

Fountain Valley, CA
From: Hugo Larios
DMS Facility Services
RE: Janitorial Services at City Offices & Facilities
Purchasing,
Thank you for the opportunity to continue our partnership with the City of Fountain Valley.

Included in this proposal, please find our cost analysis for the new agreement.

Please let us know if there is anything further we can provide to your team that would be helpful in your evaluation.

We look forward to reviewing at your convenience.

Best Regards,
Hugo Larios
Senior District Manager
DMS Facility Services LLC
Office: (626) 305-8500
Cell: (626) 213-6004

Page 113 ends

3 PRICING
City of Fountain Valley
Description Units
Monthly Unit
Price Total
Monthly Unit
Price Total
City Hall & Council Chambers
10200 Slatter Ave 12 $3,454.00 $41,448.00 $3,566.00 $42,792.00 Corporation Yard
17300 Mt. Hermann St 12 $2,788.00 $33,456.00 $2,879.00 $34,548.00 Policy Facility
10200 Slater Ave 12 $7,188.00 $86,256.00 $7,422.00 $89,064.00 Recreatio Center Main Building
17967 Burshard St 12 $4,970.00 $59,640.00 $5,132.00 $61,584.00 Sport Park Outbuildings
16400 Brookhurst St 12 $9,889 $118,668.00 $10,210.00 $122,520.00 Senior Center Cleaning
17967 Burshard St. 12 $4,907.00 $58,884.00 $5,066.00 $60,792.00 Los Alamos Park 12 $409.00 $4,908.00 $423.00 $5,076.00
Total: $33,605.00 $403,260.00 $34,698.00 $416,376.00
2023-2024 2024-2025
Units
CH Carpet Cleaning 2 $1,068.00 $2,136.00 $1,103.00 $2,206.00 CY Carpet Cleaning 2 $223.00 $446.00 $230.00 $460.00
Police Carpet Cleaning 2 $781.00 $1,562.00 $806.00 $1,612.00 Rec Ctr Carpet Cleaning 2 $112.00 $224.00 $116.00 $232.00 Sr. Ctr Carpet Cleaning other 2 $363.00 $726.00 $375.00 $750.00 Fire St #1 Deep Clean 1 $1,239.00 $1,239.00 $1,279.00 $1,279.00 Fire St #2 Deep Clean 1 $952.00 $952.00 $983.00 $983.00 Total: $7,285.00 $7,522.00
2023-2024 2024-2025

Page 114 ends

Thank You!

Page 115 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approval to send a response to the Orange County Grand Jury regarding Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Orange County Grand Jury released the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury report, “Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains”, on June 9, 2023. The report identifies the challenges the County faces with regard to ensuring an adequate water supply to meet the County’s future water needs and makes recommendations on how to address the County’s water supply challenges.

In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2022-2023 Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by their findings and recommendations. A response from the City of Fountain Valley has been requested with regards to each of the Findings 1-12 and Recommendations 2-4 by September 5, 2023.

Staff is requesting approval to send a response to the Orange County Grand Jury.

DISCUSSION:

On June 9, 2023, the Orange County Grand Jury released the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury report, “Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains.” The purpose of the report was to investigate what actions Orange County is taking, or should be taking, to ensure the County’s

Page 116 ends

Response to Orange County Grand Jury Report – Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

water supply in the face of longer droughts and extreme weather patterns caused by climate change and the increasing demand for water caused by the State’s mandated housing development.

Approximately half of all water used in Southern California is imported from the Colorado River and California Aqueduct, which are severely constrained sources of water. Although North and Central Orange County are served by a well-managed supply of water in underground storage, it cannot meet the needs of the entire County. South County is largely dependent on imported water.

In addition, the State of California has mandated local governments to provide more affordable housing and is promoting higher-density development. These mandates fail to recognize the limitations of the current water supply and do not provide additional sources of water to support the resulting increase in demand.

Climate change and mandated housing development increase the urgency of finding and implementing new methods of obtaining additional water resources. Throughout the County, there are numerous innovative water projects under consideration or development, but they may not be timely enough to avoid people running short of water and having to conserve more, ultimately leading to mandated rationing.

The Orange County Grand Jury’s investigation into this issue included identifying and interviewing key personnel; reviewing information from various water districts and interested parties; reviewing numerous documents pertaining to this report; and touring several water facilities. Based on the results of their investigation, the Grand Jury’s report presents 12 principal findings and four recommendations.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

This does not require the Attorney for the City review or approval.

ALTERNATIVES:

Page 117 ends

Response to Orange County Grand Jury Report – Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

Alternative No. 1: Approve the Mayor to send a response to the presiding judge regarding the Orange County Grand Jury report - Historic Rain, Yet Drought Remains. This is the recommended action.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve and provide direction to staff regarding the Grand Jury report.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting the City Council to approve Alternative No. 1 or provide further direction to City staff.

1. Orange County Grand Jury Report

2. Mayor’s letter to Maria Hernandez, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court

Page 118 ends

Page 119 ends

Page 120 ends

Page 121 ends

Page 122 ends

Page 123 ends

Page 124 ends

Page 125 ends

Page 126 ends

Page 127 ends

Page 128 ends

Page 129 ends

Page 130 ends

Page 131 ends

Page 132 ends

Page 133 ends

Page 134 ends

Page 135 ends

Page 136 ends

Page 137 ends

Page 138 ends

Page 139 ends

Page 140 ends

Page 141 ends

Page 142 ends

Page 143 ends

Page 144 ends

Page 145 ends

Page 146 ends

Page 147 ends

Page 148 ends

Page 149 ends

Page 150 ends

Page 151 ends

Page 152 ends

Page 153 ends

Page 154 ends

Page 155 ends

Page 156 ends

Page 157 ends

Page 158 ends

Page 159 ends

Page 160 ends

Page 161 ends

Page 162 ends

Page 163 ends

Page 164 ends

Page 165 ends

Page 166 ends

Page 167 ends

Page 168 ends

Page 169 ends

Page 170 ends

Page 171 ends

Page 172 ends

Page 173 ends

Page 174 ends

Page 175 ends

Page 176 ends

Page 177 ends

Page 178 ends

Page 179 ends

Page 180 ends

Page 181 ends

Page 182 ends

Page 183 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approval to Send a Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding the Grand Jury Report- Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Fountain Valley is required to respond to the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury report, Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange, in compliance with Penal Code 933.05(f).

Local jurisdictions identified in the Grand Jury report are required to provide a response to each of the findings and recommendations. A response to the Grand Jury report is due by September 1, 2023, to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. City staff is seeking approval for the response to the Orange County Grand Jury.

DISCUSSION:

Orange County Animal Care (OCAC) is a municipal animal shelter that serves the unincorporated areas of Orange County and 14 contract cities, including the City of Fountain Valley. OCAC can shelter up to 600 animals and has 137 authorized staff positions. It is one of the largest municipal shelters on the West Coast. OCAC has been the topic of public concern and five Orange County Grand Jury reports since the 1990s, the most recent being a June 2023 report titled, Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange. In the report, the Grand Jury finds three main areas of

Page 184 ends

Grand Jury Report
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

concern: the management of the shelter, the welfare of animals under shelter care, and the communication and engagement with the public and animal rescue community. The Grand Jury has required the City of Fountain Valley to respond to Findings F4, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F15, and F16, and Recommendation R6 by September 1, 2023. The City’s proposed responses are detailed in the attached letter.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact related to this item.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City has reviewed this report.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1:

Alternative No. 2:

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange.

Do not approve and provide direction to Staff regarding the Grand Jury report
Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 Approve to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange.

Prepared by: Matthew L. Sheppard, Chief of Police
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager

Page 185 ends

Grand Jury Report
August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

Attachments:

1. Grand Jury Report 2022-2023- Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice, the State of Animal Welfare Overseen by the County of Orange

2. City of Fountain Valley Response Letter

Page 186 ends

Page 187 ends

Page 188 ends

Page 189 ends

Page 190 ends

Page 191 ends

Page 192 ends

Page 193 ends

Page 194 ends

Page 195 ends

Page 196 ends

Page 197 ends

Page 198 ends

Page 199 ends

Page 200 ends

Page 201 ends

Page 202 ends

Page 203 ends

Page 204 ends

Page 205 ends

Page 206 ends

Page 207 ends

Page 208 ends

Page 209 ends

Page 210 ends

Page 211 ends

Page 212 ends

Page 213 ends

Page 214 ends

Page 215 ends

Page 216 ends

Page 217 ends

Page 218 ends

Page 219 ends

Page 220 ends

Page 221 ends

Page 222 ends

Page 223 ends

Page 224 ends

Page 225 ends

Page 226 ends

Page 227 ends

Page 228 ends

Page 229 ends

Page 230 ends

Page 231 ends

Page 232 ends

Page 233 ends

Page 234 ends

Page 235 ends

Page 236 ends

Page 237 ends

Page 238 ends

Page 239 ends

Page 240 ends

Page 241 ends

Page 242 ends

Page 243 ends

Page 244 ends

Page 245 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approval to Send a Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding the Grand Jury Report - SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Fountain Valley is required to respond to the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury report, SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?, in compliance with Penal Code 933.05(f).

Local jurisdictions identified in the Grand Jury report are required to provide a response to each of the findings and recommendations. A response to the Grand Jury report is due by September 18, 2023, to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. City staff is seeking approval for the response to the Orange County Grand Jury.

DISCUSSION:

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Kaiser Family Foundation, firearms are now the leading cause of death among children ages one through eighteen. The Center for Homeland Defense and Security, in conjunction with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, maintains a K-12 school shooting database as part of their Homeland Security program. Some of the important statistical findings are as follows:
 There were 2,069 school shooting incidents between 1970 and June 2022  For the above time frame, 684 students and staff died in shootings at schools

Page 246 ends

Grand Jury Report- SCHOOL SHOOTINGS – How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools? August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

 1,937 were injured
 California was one of the states with the most incidents.

The 2022-2023 Grand Jury, based on its investigation, believes that Orange County public school districts are doing a good job in attempting to maintain a safe and secure campus for their students and school personnel/staff.

During most interviews with members of Orange County law enforcement, the Grand Jury learned that it is not a matter of “IF” an Orange County campus will be a victim of an active shooter but “WHEN” it will be a victim.

The reason for the 2022-2023 Grand Jury study is to use all the information it learned through its method of study and provide recommendations to all the Orange County public schools on how they can make their schools safer for all their students, teachers, and staff while maintaining a quality campus learning environment.

Recommendations for improvement were made in the following areas:
 Building and equipment infrastructure
 Training and training materials available for all personnel responsible for student safety and welfare
 Implementation of tabletop exercises throughout all Orange County school districts  The need for more School Resource Officers (SROs)
 Increased coordination of responsibility between school staff and law enforcement  Increased awareness of and address mental health issues  Increased fiscal commitments to implement identified school safety measures The Grand Jury has required the City of Fountain Valley to respond to Findings F1, F8, and Recommendations R1, R3, R4, and R12 by September 18, 2023. The City’s proposed responses are detailed in the attached letter.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact related to this item.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City has reviewed this report.

Page 247 ends

Grand Jury Report- SCHOOL SHOOTINGS – How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools? August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1:

Alternative No. 2:

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report,
SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?
Do not approve and provide direction to Staff regarding the Grand Jury report
Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1: Approve to send a response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court regarding the Grand Jury report, SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools? Prepared by: Matthew L. Sheppard, Chief of Police
Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Grand Jury Report 2022-2023 - SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: How
Prepared Are Orange County Public Schools?

2. City of Fountain Valley Response Letter

Page 248 ends

Page 249 ends

Page 250 ends

Page 251 ends

Page 252 ends

Page 253 ends

Page 254 ends

Page 255 ends

Page 256 ends

Page 257 ends

Page 258 ends

Page 259 ends

Page 260 ends

Page 261 ends

Page 262 ends

Page 263 ends

Page 264 ends

Page 265 ends

Page 266 ends

Page 267 ends

Page 268 ends

Page 269 ends

Page 270 ends

Page 271 ends

Page 272 ends

Page 273 ends

Page 274 ends

Page 275 ends

Page 276 ends

Page 277 ends

Page 278 ends

Page 279 ends

Page 280 ends

Page 281 ends

Page 282 ends

Page 283 ends

Page 284 ends

Page 285 ends

Page 286 ends

Page 287 ends

Page 288 ends

Page 289 ends

Page 290 ends

Page 291 ends

Page 292 ends

Page 293 ends

Page 294 ends

Page 295 ends

Page 296 ends

Page 297 ends

Page 298 ends

Page 299 ends

Page 300 ends

Page 301 ends

Page 302 ends

Page 303 ends

Page 304 ends

Page 305 ends

Page 306 ends

Page 307 ends

Page 308 ends

Page 309 ends

Page 310 ends

Page 311 ends

Page 312 ends

Page 313 ends

Page 314 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approval to Send a Response to the Orange County Grand Jury Regarding Group Homes/Sober Living Facilities
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Orange County Grand Jury issued a report on June 7, 2023, entitled “’Welcome to the Neighborhood’: Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?”. The report details the benefits and the many negative impacts of group homes/sober living homes and the limitations enacted by the State preventing cities from regulating these businesses.

Recommendations by the Grand Jury include local cities working together to addressing citizen concerns by forming interdisciplinary panels, create a model ordinance for all interested Orange County cities, pooling of resources to defend against lawsuits, improve data collection and the formation of a task force to generate a plan to create awareness of the issue with State legislators/regulators.

DISCUSSION:

On June 7, 2023, the Orange County Grand Jury (OCGJ) issued an investigative report with findings and recommendations to address the impacts of group/sober living homes in the County. The OCGJ studied the State legislative framework, the actions of cities in addressing the issue with the general public, regulatory actions taken by cities to date and legal actions taken against cities for enacting these regulations.

The City of Fountain Valley has, at a minimum, 30 unlicensed operating in the City. These 30 businesses which are run out of the residential properties in the City, represent those that the City is aware of based on complaints to the Police Department and Code Enforcement. Based

Page 315 ends

Group Homes: Response to Grand Jury Report
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

on these complaints and as evidenced by public testimony at a recent City Council Study Session held on July 18, 2023 regarding group homes, there is substantial evidence that these facilities have had a profound negative impact on the community and residents. In addition, Staff believes that there are many more facilities operating that that the City is not yet aware of and it is possible given the City’s current inability to regulate these facilities based on State Law, that new facilities will continue to open.

To address the issue, the OCGJ has issued their report included in Attachment 1 to this staff report. As a result of the investigation, OCGJ issued produced 11 findings and five (5) recommendations, all of which necessitate a response from the City of Fountain Valley Attachment 2 is the City’s draft response to the OCGJ’s report. Upon authorization by the City Council, the responses in Attachment 2 will be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact related to this item.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorneys for the City assisted with the preparation of this staff report and the response to the Grand Jury.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve the Draft letter
Alternative No. 2: Do not approve the draft letter and provide Staff further guidance.

Staff is requesting City Council approval of Alternative No. 1 to approve the response to the Grand Jury.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Orange County Grand Jury’s investigative report, findings, and recommendations regarding Orange County Homelessness and authorize the Mayor to deliver the City’s response to the findings and recommendations to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

Prepared by: Omar Dadabhoy

Page 316 ends

Group Homes: Response to Grand Jury Report
August 15, 2023

Page 3 ends

Approved by: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Grand Jury Report entitled, “’Welcome to the Neighborhood’ Are Cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?”

2. Draft Response to Grand Jury Report

Page 317 ends

Welcome to the Neighborhood
Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?

County of Orange

Grand Jury 2022-2023

Page 318 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 4 REASON FOR STUDY........................................................................................................................ 6 METHOD OF STUDY......................................................................................................................... 7 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 7 OC Group Home Density............................................................................................................. 8 Tracking Challenges .................................................................................................................. 10 Common Nuisances .................................................................................................................. 11 Lead Cities................................................................................................................................. 12 Cities Are Standing Alone.......................................................................................................... 12 Fear of Litigation Costs ............................................................................................................. 13 State Actions............................................................................................................................. 17 Housing Element....................................................................................................................... 18 Educating the Public ................................................................................................................. 19 How Has This Issue Evolved? .................................................................................................... 23 FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................... 24 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................... 25 RESPONSES.................................................................................................................................... 25 90 Day Response Required ....................................................................................................... 27 GLOSSARY...................................................................................................................................... 29 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................................. 34 NOTICE .......................................................................................................................................... 40 END NOTES.................................................................................................................................... 40

Page 319 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 3 of 42

SUMMARY
Group homes are an important component in the healthcare and/or recovery of many people. These homes provide, among other things, Substance Recovery, Hospice Care, Residential Care for the Elderly, and Sober Living. When group homes are operated for the well-being of their residents and with respect for their neighbors, they can be an asset to their host community. However, they can occasionally become disruptive and the motivation for nuisance calls to local code enforcement. In extreme cases, the “curbing” of residents can contribute to the homeless population.

Negative interactions with disruptive group homes often lead to neighborhood opposition and anger towards city officials. How cities respond to the anger of their constituents impacts their ability to successfully integrate group homes. Residents are more likely to respond positively when cities offer townhall style meetings with police, fire, code enforcement, legal, and subject matter expert involvement, especially where the subject is discussed objectively, and public input is encouraged and respected.

Issues and concerns neighborhood residents have with group homes stem primarily from an over-concentration of homes in residential areas. Multiple cities in Orange County have attempted to manage integration of group homes into neighborhoods by enacting ordinances that include setting a minimum distance between group homes to avoid the problems associated with over-concentration. Most cities with such ordinances have not enforced them due to the fear of incurring litigation costs.

The Grand Jury reviewed the challenges of successfully integrating group homes into neighborhoods, including pressures exerted on Orange County cities by residents, group home operators, and the State of California.

The State of California has recently joined the group home debate, has altered the conversation, and raised the stakes. The State wields a large club with its power of approval of the required Housing Element. The California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) is withholding approval for cities that have ordinances attempting to place limits or impose oversight on group homes. Cities are then vulnerable to a loss of control over zoning and permitting, as well as loss of State and regional funding.

Some cities have decided to push back on the pressures put on them from HCD and the fight has been carried out on an individual city basis. The Orange County Grand Jury recommends that the County of Orange and cities join forces to create ordinances, pool resources for defense of lawsuits, and work together to generate awareness among legislators to improve regulations and management standards to ensure health and safety for group home residents.

Page 320 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 4 of 42

BACKGROUND
Orange County has 42 miles of beautiful coastline, three harbors, and 25 urban and wilderness parks - including 230 miles of riding and hiking trails. Orange County also has the dubious honor of having more than its share of our State’s total number of group recovery and sober living residences. Frequently referred to as “The Rehab Riviera”, several cities in Orange County have been dealing with pockets of overconcentration of these types of group homes. This has posed challenges for the residents in whose neighborhoods they are located, as well as the occupants of the recovery and sober living homes.

Many of the homes in
question are privately
owned, unlicensed,
unsupervised, and a
challenge to monitor and
regulate. When a
neighborhood has multiple
group homes, it becomes
a more institutional
environment; this alters
the character of the
neighborhood and defeats
the purpose of the
“integration” of people who
are recovering.

The Orange County coast is a magnet for sober living homes To address these shortcomings, multiple cities, and the County, on behalf of unincorporated areas, have enacted ordinances that manage the permitting and tracking of group homes.

Several significant pieces of legislation have played a part in the expansion of group homes. These include California’s Lanterman Mental Retardation Act (1988), the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, the California Community Care Facilities Act, and California’s Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (Proposition 36). The resulting deinstitutionalization has had a positive effect on the lives of many people but has created a challenge for cities as they work towards the responsible integration of the group living arrangements necessary to accommodate the impacted population.
1

Page 321 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 5 of 42
Since deinstitutionalization, the State of California has resisted appeals from local cities to pass permitting laws, distancing requirements, or any type of regulation at all. There is a misconception that these regulatory ordinances are intended to discriminate against people who are disabled due to alcohol and drug addiction, and the State of California has cited this misconception as the guiding principle for its dogged challenge of most attempts by cities to manage the responsible integration of group homes into residential neighborhoods. Rather, such city ordinances are intended to protect those people who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction, as well as the neighborhoods where group homes are located.

Licensed residential rehab programs are subject to the same local laws as single-family homes, and no more. State law imposes fewer restrictions on licensed rehab programs than other licensed group homes. The Community Care Facilities Act, from which alcohol and drug rehab facilities are exempt, imposes restrictions that protect the character of residential neighborhoods. Under this act, cities receive written notice of a proposed facility, and any city or county may request denial of the license based on overconcentration of residential care facilities. While alcohol and drug programs that provide 24-hour residential non-medical services to adults recovering from drug or alcohol abuse must obtain a State license, they cannot be regulated any differently from a single-family home if they serve six or fewer people.

California Health & Safety Code Sections 1520.5 and 1267.9 state it is a policy of the State to prevent overconcentration of residential facilities that impair the integrity of residential neighborhoods. Section 1520.5 states that the department shall deny an application for a new residential facility license if the department determines the facilities location is proximate to an existing residential facility therefore resulting in overconcentration. The statute recognized the need for a balanced policy to prevent overconcentration of residential care facilities which indicates an awareness and understanding of the impact of overconcentration on the integrity of residential neighborhoods. The statute defines overconcentration as less than 300 feet for some types of group homes and up to 1000 feet for others. At the time the statute was enacted it was specific only to certain types of group homes. However, the recent emphasis on providing more housing in California has eroded the intent of this act.

Federal and State fair housing laws protect people with disabilities from housing discrimination. Recovering alcoholics and drug addicts are disabled for purposes of antidiscrimination laws. When people in recovery live together in a “sober living” home, cities cannot discriminate based on such disabilities, therefore an ordinance cannot treat sober living homes differently than other similar uses in single-family residential zones.

Sober living homes are not required to be licensed and are not limited to six or fewer residents. Because no treatment is provided in these substance-free, mutually supportive living environments, no license is required. The limitation of most other group

Page 322 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 6 of 42
homes to six residents is part of the State statute; however, confusion arises because the statute does not apply to sober living homes.

There is only so much a city can do to respond to the complaints of its residents when dealing with an overconcentration of group homes in a neighborhood. It is important for city residents to be educated on the barriers faced by cities, and to work with their city to overcome these barriers.

Current laws do not adequately address the need to manage the integration of group homes into neighborhoods. Courts should not be where the solutions are found.

REASON FOR STUDY
Many cities within Orange County have neighborhoods with a dense concentration of group recovery and sober living residences. In most circumstances, cities do not know where these group homes are located unless the homes generate a backlash from neighbors due to various types of disturbances. The Grand Jury examined how Orange County cities are managing the distancing of all types of group homes, and the impact group homes have on neighborhoods and group home residents when the homes are in close proximity to one another.

Group homes, most often Recovery and Sober Living homes, and the nuisances that are commonly associated with them, are not new to Orange County. Neighborhood complaints, concerns from individuals living in or related to residents of group homes, the litigious nature of the relationship between cities and group home operators, and abuse of the healthcare system have been in play in Orange County for well over a decade.

The Grand Jury began this study by looking at how cities are managing the influx and locations of group homes and identifying best practices where they are found. The working premise was that each city is responsible for the integration of group homes, which would serve to protect the residents of group homes while maintaining the existing neighborhood atmosphere.

Has there been success addressing the issues associated with group homes and what does that look like? Are cities going it alone or are there county-wide efforts? Has there been progress made in this area? The Grand Jury approached the topic of group home integration seeking answers to these questions with the expectation that there were some systems in place resulting in the successful integration of group homes. The investigation took a winding road which revealed that, despite countless attempts at change, many of the problems that surfaced over a decade ago are still present. The Grand Jury found that successfully implemented solutions have become even more impactful in light of the State of California’s heavy-handed entry into the debate.

Page 323 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 7 of 42

METHOD OF STUDY
The Grand Jury has evaluated official documents, examined news articles, visited multiple recovery/sober living websites, and assessed secondary sources.

The Grand Jury reviewed
numerous documents, including
the 2022 State of California’s
Group Home Technical Advisory2
and the 1990 State of California
Health and Safety Code.3
To better understand the impact
of density, jurors attended
townhall and city council meetings
virtually, through recordings, and
visited neighborhoods in several
cities where there is a heavy
concentration of group homes.

The Grand Jury interviewed numerous subject matter experts, city managers, County and city officials, legislators, city attorneys, group home operators, and legal and real estate professionals. It also examined local, state, and national media reports and opinion pieces regarding group recovery and sober living residences. The Findings and Recommendations herein are based on this work.

INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS
Orange County has some of the heaviest concentrations of group homes and sober living residences in the nation.
4 The densities are more than the local population can
bear and residents believe the influx of the group home residents seriously impacts their neighborhoods. Similarly, group home and sober living industry experts cite negative impacts on the group home residents themselves.

Operators can open a group home where they desire, without having a license or Stateendorsed certification, and they can open as many group homes as they desire regardless of local need. Because regulation is slack, cities are challenged to track and regulate the density without any guidance or support from the State. Adding to these concerns is a recent State of California memorandum titled “Group Home Technical Advisory” that characterizes any attempts to regulate the homes as discriminatory.5 It seems that method of thinking has no positive effect on how the homes are run or on how the vulnerable residents in these homes are treated, and quite possibly has the opposite effect.

Page 324 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 8 of 42
“Residents of these homes are moving in and
out at an alarming, transitory rate”
OC Group Home Density
Reportedly, Orange County has more than its share of group homes in California, and the country for that matter, specific to housing individuals in need of Recovery/Sober Living Homes.6 There are no existing requirements for sober living homes with six or fewer residents to identify or register themselves as such.

It is estimated that up to 36% of houses required to be licensed (those providing services) by the State of California as group homes for six or fewer residents are located in Orange County. In addition, there are hundreds of group homes not requiring licensing that exist in Orange County neighborhoods. This lack of identification makes it extremely difficult to estimate the total number of sober living homes in our communities.7
As documented in numerous city council and townhall meetings, residents and activists have raised concerns about over-saturation and common nuisances to local community governing bodies (see Common Nuisances section). In many cases, these are neighborhoods in which multiple group homes are in close proximity (for example three in one cul-de-sac) or individual homes are run with little to no on-site supervision.

Neighborhoods are losing their original character and familial aspect, with some becoming increasingly institutional and others experiencing more of a “frat house” feel.

Residents of these homes are moving in and out at an alarming, transitory rate.

Neighbors describe some of these group homes as taking no responsibility for the actions of their inhabitants. Rules and responsibilities are either not imposed or not enforced by the group home operators. The complaints are predominantly related to non-regulated group homes.

Over the last several years, multiple cities in Orange County have sought to find a solution to alleviate these concerns. Several have performed due diligence to ensure that any action taken will provide for neighborhoods to remain neighborhoods, and that both the disabled and the recovering addicts needing to live in these types of group homes are in fact living in a normalized residential environment that provides the best opportunity to be successful in their recovery.

Page 325 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 9 of 42
This is not simply a “Not In My Backyard” (NIMBY) issue or reaction as evidenced by the large number of homes that receive few or no complaints. The need for well-run Recovery/Sober Living Homes is not in dispute. Concerns arise when these homes are poorly run and/or when multiple homes are in close proximity, contributing to the problem of over-concentration. These two circumstances cause changes in the local neighborhood, and it is questionable whether they are aiding the very residents that they are meant to be assisting and whether residents of these homes are integrating into a normalized environment.

To that end, various cities have introduced ordinances toward resolving the problem.

Some of these include distancing requirements between group homes ranging from 300 to 1000 feet. Some ordinances require group homes to register or self-identify as such.

California Health & Safety Code Section 1267.9 provides specific requirements for distancing of most types of group homes settings.8 These requirements are similar to the local city ordinances in that they provide certain spacing restrictions of between 300 and1000 feet. Sober Living Homes, however, are excluded from any distancing requirement by the State.

The State imposes licensing requirements on most types of group homes and provides for oversight by one or more State or County agency. Sober Living Homes with six or fewer residents are not required to be licensed by the State and have no regulatory

Page 326 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 10 of 42
oversight. These two factors alone allow anyone to set up, open, and advertise this type of group home anywhere in California. Orange County seems to be the favored location, yet has no say in the siting or quantity of group homes in our residential neighborhoods.

Tracking Challenges
Just where are these sober living homes? All over. How do we know? We actually don’t.

There are few local ordinances requiring the registration, licensing, or declaration of any type of unlicensed sober living or recovery residence that has been established in a neighborhood. There are no widely adopted methods to track or monitor any aspect of such dwellings – their location, number of people residing in them, on-site management, or their ownership.

The Grand Jury’s research found that most sober living homes are not required by law to have any kind of State license. Some cities have enacted ordinances that require a permit or registration. When a sober living establishment is registered and a complaint is received, the complaint may be recorded and could be tracked, at least for the location of that specific home.

Except for the few cities with ordinances regulating sober living homes and the few homes that applied for registration or received ministerial permits, accurate tracking and monitoring remains challenging. Tracking is attainable if cities’ code and law enforcement establish and actively utilize a searchable database that includes

Page 327 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 11 of 42
information about police and fire calls, nuisance complaints or code infractions, and identification of type of establishment. The use of this information can help identify the location and density of group homes.

Common Nuisances
Residents living in cities with neighborhoods having a significant number of recovery and sober living homes complain that the proliferation of these group homes in recent years has become unmanageable, and that overconcentration is impacting the quality of life for everyone.

For years, many citizens living in neighborhoods with an unrestrained growth of sober living homes have been voicing their concerns and frustrations over the lack of protection their communities are given. While many of these group homes adopt rules and regulations and attempt to be good neighbors, a citizen’s primary method for reporting concerns about a disruptive home is initiating a nuisance complaint to their local law enforcement.

The outcry is that unregulated sober living residences make for bad neighbors. Sober living homes are not always bad neighbors, but when they are concentrated in a small geographic area or neighborhood, the common nuisances can become more visible and disruptive. Ultimately, this raises concerns about the potential or actual diminished character of the neighborhood.

Page 328 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 12 of 42
“The well-funded operators are supported by
industry organizations and associations
in their lawsuits…”
Lead Cities
Although the City of Costa Mesa has been front and center in the legal fights related to group homes, it was Newport Beach that first stepped into the arena in 2008. Three companies sued the City over an ordinance that was approved by the City Council in 2008 that regulated group homes for recovering addicts.9 Pacific Shores Properties, Newport Coast Recovery, and Yellowstone Women’s First Step House sued Newport Beach for a total of $5.24 million. Still in place today, this ordinance was the first of its kind in Orange County and it established quiet hours, parking and smoking areas, and van routes. It also required the City’s approval for new unlicensed homes for recovering addicts in certain neighborhoods. In 2015, the City reached the end of its seven-year legal battle over sober-living homes with a settlement agreement.10 11 According to the Orange County Register, which cites its own archives, Newport Beach spent at least four million dollars in legal costs on the cases. In 2008, there were 81 facilities and 614 total beds identified in Newport Beach. In 2021, there were a known 30 facilities with 210 total beds. Where did all those facilities and beds go?12 Perhaps to the City of Costa Mesa. In 2015, the City of Costa Mesa enacted their own ordinance (amended in 2017) after seeing a sharp increase in the number of sober living homes followed by a steep increase in the number of community complaints. On the heels of the ordinance came the legal challenges, and Costa Mesa prevailed in all challenges until January 2023 when two sober living homes, embroiled in litigation against the city, were handed a legal victory in federal court. The earlier dismissal was reversed and remanded by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which ruled that asking operators of sober living facilities for proof of disability violates federal law barring discrimination against those with disabilities and bars discrimination in housing.

As the legal battle waged on, other local governments explored, advanced, or enacted regulation of sober living homes, including the County of Orange (2015), and Cities of Laguna Hills (2015), San Clemente (2016), Laguna Niguel (2016), San Juan Capistrano (2016), Anaheim (2020), and Huntington Beach (2020). Most of these entities, perhaps all, have chosen not to enforce their ordinances out of concern of potential litigation, and are waiting for Costa Mesa’s litigation to conclude.

Cities Are Standing Alone
Multiple cities in the County have executed ordinances to regulate unlicensed group homes. With the exception of the newly formed South Orange County Sober Living and

Page 329 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 13 of 42
Recovery Task Force, cities have not collaborated on solutions to shared and common problems. This has been done on an individual basis, with little collaboration among cities. Prior to drafting an ordinance, some cities study the details and effectiveness of other cities’ actions, particularly the City of Costa Mesa’s ordinance, and use that as a template to draft their own.13
Once enacted, few of the ordinances are being enforced. This lack of enforcement is due to a small number of very specific impediments and concerns. These include:
• Fear of litigation costs due to lawsuits filed by group home operators against cities that have enforced ordinances. (The City of Costa Mesa has reportedly incurred over ten million dollars in legal fees in relation to group home litigation.) • Fear of the State of California withholding approval of the Housing Element for cities that have ordinances related to the management of group homes, resulting in the potential loss of state funds and local zoning control. • Lack of enforcement resources. Most cities do not have the staff resources to enforce these ordinances.

While individual cities take a wait-and-see approach to follow the progress of other cities that are standing up to the State, little progress is being made. The cities and County of Orange would benefit by working in partnership with one another to garner resources and create a coalition to promote change. While the newly constituted South Orange County Sober Living and Recovery Task Force is a good start, and the first tangible recognition of the need to work together, the Grand Jury recommends a countywide cooperative taskforce.

Orange County’s cities and unincorporated areas are demographically diverse.The active sharing of ideas, experiences, and information will be valuable to the overall process of developing a worthwhile model ordinance and plan for moving forward in the efforts to protect both the individual characteristics of Orange County neighborhoods, and all individuals living in those neighborhoods.

Fear of Litigation Costs
Cities are concerned about the high cost of litigation and the time required to defend ordinances regulating group homes. Private entities have challenged ordinances and in some cases won, and in other cases continued to pursue lawsuits in spite of opposition.

In one case, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requested that the California Department of Justice file a “friend of the court” application to intervene on behalf the litigant in its case against the City. 14

Page 330 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 14 of 42
Two examples of cities being involved in lengthy and costly lawsuits include Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. In 2007, Newport Beach had numerous sober living homes and was facing increasing pressure by residents to regulate them. In January 2008, Newport Beach passed an ordinance regulating sober living homes. The ordinance was carefully crafted to comply with State and federal law.15
By November 2008, several legal actions occurred. These included:

1. A lawsuit from a residents’ group (the “Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach” or CCNB) arguing that the City did not go far enough in enacting Ordinance 2008-

05. CCNB also sued multiple operators and asked for $250 million in damages from the City;

2. Two group home operators (Pacific Shores Recovery and Sober Living by the Sea) filed complaints with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) alleging that the City’s ordinance and its practices have discriminated against disabled persons entitled to fair housing;

3. Multiple lawsuits were filed by Sober Living By the Sea (SLBTS) alleging that the City’s group residential uses ordinance was facially discriminatory against persons in recovery. The City reached an agreement with SLBTS;

4. The City filed lawsuits against Morningside Recovery and Pacific Shores Recovery, alleging that some of their operations opened illegally during a shortterm temporary moratorium against the establishment of new group residential uses. Pacific Shores Recovery has in turn alleged that the City’s group

Page 331 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 15 of 42
residential uses ordinance was facially discriminatory against persons in recovery;

5. A cross-complaint by the City against Sober Living By The Sea and other operators that consolidated certain lawsuits in U.S. District Court.

Chairs are packed during a discussion on sober-living homes in San Clemente in 2016. (Photo by Matt Masin, Orange County Register, SCNG)
Subsequently, in 2009, three companies sued the City of Newport Beach over the ordinance, claiming it violated anti-discrimination and fair housing laws because individuals recovering from an addiction are a protected group. A federal judge ruled in favor of the City in 2011. The companies appealed the case and it went to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where the Court’s majority sided with the group homes, saying there was enough evidence to argue discrimination. The Court pointed to comments made during the 2008 hearing, which implied that the City Council was targeting recovery group homes.

The City of Newport Beach asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case in 2014, but the Court declined. The City settled with the group homes for $5.25 million in 2015.

The City’s estimated legal costs exceeded four million dollars, 16 for a total cost close to
ten million dollars.

The City of Costa Mesa waged a fierce and costly legal battle to regulate sober living homes for over five years. As noted in the section regarding the State’s actions and attitude, Costa Mesa fashioned an ordinance within the limits of State and federal laws

Page 332 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 16 of 42
in 2014.17 The City ultimately spent over seven million dollars in litigation, and prevailed in State and federal courts; however, in January 2023, a federal appellate court reversed and remanded the district court’s 2020 ruling.

Costa Mesa Ordinance 15-11 sets limited standards for three items that address important societal issues, none of which are discriminatory in nature:

1. Spacing (650 feet apart)

2. Background screening of the house manager

3. Process for evicting residents
Spacing between group homes maintains the purpose of the facility and residential character of the neighborhood. Screening protects the residents of the facility. Through interviewees, the Grand Jury learned of group home managers with criminal backgrounds and who are themselves currently substance abusers. Standards for evictions are needed. Through interviews and newspaper articles, the Grand Jury learned of the practice of “curbing,” putting residents out on the curb when their source of payment runs out or when they are in violation of house rules. This practice is believed to contribute to homelessness in Orange County.

Costa Mesa’s ordinance serves an important purpose, but the ordinance is still in litigation after several years and at an estimated cost of more than ten million dollars.18 Other Cities in California and Orange County are similarly facing lawsuits and costs associated with group home and sober living ordinances. Cities could pool resources to mitigate litigation cost concerns. A coalition of cities to spread costs is highly recommended.

The Grand Jury learned that the lawsuits brought against cities are supported and enabled by an extremely profitable industry. According to John LaRosa at MarketResearch.com on February 5, 2020,
19 the group home market is 42 billion dollars
per year. Mr. LaRosa also noted that the industry needed to be cleaned up as many of the operators engaged in overbilling, patient brokering, and deceptive marketing.

The well-funded operators are supported by industry organizations and associations in their lawsuits. Industry organizations include large groups such as the California Consortium of Addiction Programs and Professionals, Behavioral Health Associates, and National Sober Living Associates. The websites of any of these organizations and several others can be viewed to see the type of support often provided. The organizations not only provide support for lawsuits, but also assist in lobbying State and federal legislators.

Many group home operators do not want any type of regulation, as evidenced by the Costa Mesa and Newport lawsuits, though the Grand Jury found some operators who welcome additional regulation to protect the industry from bad operators. In summary, the industry represents a formidable foe in lawsuits due to funding and industry associations.

Page 333 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 17 of 42
State Actions
Zoning ordinances are the primary control local governments have over city land use.

The State of California has challenged the validity of group home ordinances, thereby inhibiting local governments in addressing group homes through zoning ordinances. If challenged, defense of the ordinances is costly and the alternative is to repeal them, a process that can be politically charged.

When Costa Mesa originally prevailed in the lawsuits filed against their 2014 sober living ordinance, the Cities of Encinitas, Huntington Beach, Anaheim and the County of Orange adopted similar ordinances for sober living facilities. In May 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) sent a letter to the City of Encinitas stating its ordinance was in violation of statutory prohibitions on discrimination in land use. HCD said the city must take immediate steps to repeal the ordinance.

HCD’s letter to the City of Encinitas noted “The City appears to take significant comfort from certain court opinions, several unpublished, appearing to reject specific, largely different and distinguishable challenges to a different group home ordinance in Costa Mesa, which were brought by private parties rather than the State of California. Those decisions are neither on point nor binding here.” This statement is misleading to the general public because it downplays judicial rulings favoring Costa Mesa’s ordinance.

In May of 2021, HCD sent a “Letter of Technical Assistance” to the City of Anaheim in which they discuss Anaheim’s land use regulations. One of the items discussed was a phone call they had with city staff to discuss concerns with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment for group homes. HCD’s concern was that the ordinance “potentially conflict(s) with statutory prohibitions on discrimination in land use”.

Also in May of 2021, HCD sent a “Notice of Violation: City of Anaheim Notice of Violations of Housing Element Law and Anti-Discrimination in Land Use” regarding the denial of a conditional use permit for transitional housing. The California Department of Justice (DOJ) subsequently joined a civil lawsuit regarding the same action. HCD believes the City has failed to implement goals, policies, and program actions included in the housing element and failed to act consistent with Government Code requirements in applying standards to the approval of the Project.

On December 21, 2022, HCD issued a document titled Group Home Technical Advisory.
20 The executive summary includes the following:
“In recent years, some local governments have amended their zoning ordinances to add new regulations for group homes, particularly for recovery residencesgroup homes that provide housing for persons recovering from alcoholism or drug addiction. These amendments have raised concerns that local governments are not complying with their affirmative obligations under state planning and

Page 334 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 18 of 42
zoning laws to promote more inclusive communities and affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). These amendments have also generated disputes and confusion over whether local governments are violating fair housing laws by discriminating against persons with disabilities or other protected characteristics.” The document assumes the ordinances are not legally compliant and creates difficulties faced by cities trying to reasonably regulate group homes. The document is labeled a “technical advisory” but reads as a policy statement. There were apparently no public hearings regarding the document.

These actions by HCD and DOJ, as well as litigation, are challenges municipalities face in adopting ordinances regarding group homes when the courts have found these ordinances compliant with State and federal laws. This was made evident through interviews with representatives of cities. Interviewees also expressed concern that HCD interpreted the laws as being overly restrictive on zoning ordinances and failing to protect the inhabitants of group homes.

Housing Element
In the State of California, all cities are required to develop a General Plan. The General Plan serves as a blueprint for the future, prescribing policy goals and objectives to shape and guide the physical development of the city. The General Plan is a comprehensive policy document that informs future land use decisions, and it is comprised of multiple elements.
21 The Housing Element is one important part of a city or county’s General Plan. Every eight years, every city, town, and county must update their Housing Element and have it certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

The most recent cycle of the new Housing Element has been heavily impacted by the State’s laser focus on housing availability and affordability.

On September 28, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a suite of bills to boost housing production across California which accompanies the Governor’s $22 billion housing affordability and homelessness package and ongoing work by the State to spur more housing production, tackle barriers to construction, and hold local governments accountable. Taken together, the actions reflect the State’s focus on creating more “The document is labeled a “technical
advisory” but reads as a
policy statement…”

Page 335 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 19 of 42
affordable housing, faster and cheaper. “The acute affordability crisis we are experiencing in California was decades in the making, and now we’re taking the necessary steps to fix it,” said Governor Newsom.22
Although this is a response to a real need in California, the real-world consequences to the “build-build-build” solution are many. One of those can be seen in the State’s myopic push for housing as it has mistakenly equated group homes with additional housing options. But housing is not increased by allowing the unbridled proliferation of recovery and sober living homes. The industry advertises heavily outside of California and brings many of their residents from out-of-state. It is not uncommon for some of these residents to be “kicked to the curb” (referred to as curbing) for various reasons, and because they are not local to Orange County, they have nowhere to go and ultimately face homelessness.

HCD wields its power to review and approve State housing elements as a threat to deter city and county efforts to regulate group homes. Approval of the Housing Element has a big impact on a city’s ability to enforce its general plan and to control what gets built and where it is built. Without the HCD’s approval of the housing element, a door is opened to developers to bypass local zoning ordinances by utilizing a seldom used loophole known as Builders Remedy. Under that law, a developer may sidestep city approvals to construct a housing development if 20% of the project’s homes are affordable housing.23
State funding programs for transportation, infrastructure, and housing often require or consider a local jurisdiction’s compliance with Housing Element Law. These competitive funds can be used for fixing roads, adding bike lanes, improving transit, or providing much needed affordable housing to communities. In some cases, funding from state/federal housing programs can only be accessed if the jurisdiction has a compliant housing element.24 25
Educating the Public
By the time the public has organized to bring their concerns to city leadership through a letter writing campaign, a joint written complaint, or a petition, their level of frustration has likely been building for quite a while. How city leadership deals with the concerns and frustrations of their constituency is likely to determine whether it will be a collaborative or an adversarial process to find a resolution. Educating the public on the reasons that cities have seemingly been unwilling to address the integration of group homes into Orange County neighborhoods is key to the success of collaborative problem solving.

Cities have been squeezed from above by a combination of intense pressure from group home operators citing federal protections for the disabled, and the State of California’s efforts to eliminate group home ordinances by withholding approval on cities’ mandated Housing Element submission. They are also squeezed from below by

Page 336 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 20 of 42
“Some cities have used the multi-discipline,
educational, townhall type response to the public
outcry while others have not.

The outcome can be quite different.”
the people in neighborhoods which have been impacted by the over-concentration of group homes, and/or the level of nuisances generated by the group homes.

A lack of understanding of the challenges faced by cities leads to the perception that they are unwilling to step up and regulate the various group home types that are springing up in neighborhoods. Public education will reveal that there is not an unwillingness of cities, or the public, to find resolutions, but rather there are many hurdles promulgated by State and federal agencies that often prevent opportunities for reaching a solution. Cities should work together, and with State legislators and other stakeholders, to look for ways to affect change at the State level as well as provide more focused public education that addresses these issues.

In an effort to inform their citizens, some cities have used the multi-discipline, educational, townhall type response to the public outcry while others have not. The outcome can be quite different.

To illustrate, we need look no further than a tale of three cities: Anaheim, Newport Beach, and Laguna Hills. Anaheim’s group home issue heated up in October 2021 when Grandma’s House of Hope requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to use a large house as a transitional living home for 19 intractably mentally ill women. 26 It was not Grandma’s House of Hope’s first group home in Anaheim; it was the latest in many previously successful CUP requests. Local residents coalesced against this CUP request in a vocal and organized manner. Whether it was the number of residents impacted, the descriptor of the group home residents as intractably mentally ill, or just one group home too many in this neighborhood, this organized effort to prevent the approval of the large group home attracted hundreds of local citizens and activists from both sides of the issue. It seemed that the majority of these people attended the planning commission meeting to voice their opinions during the public comment portion of the agenda and to let the City’s Planning Commission see the strength of their numbers.

Page 337 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 21 of 42
The Planning Commission was seemingly prepared to accept the staff recommendation for approval. Public comment took over five hours, most of which was overwhelmingly against the approval of the group home. The applicant and the Planning Commission both expressed surprise at the public backlash. Ultimately, the approval recommendation was scrapped, and the Planning Commission voted to deny the CUP.

Grandma’s House filed an appeal and the application for the CUP was heard by the City Council. The public attended that meeting in larger numbers than at the Planning Commission meeting and they were every bit as angry and frustrated as they were at the earlier meeting. In spite of robust response on the issue at the meeting of the Planning Commission just two months earlier, the Anaheim City Council was unprepared for the charged nature of the adversarial clash. Most speakers were passionate but respectful, while some were rude and offensive. It was essentially an angrier repeat of the first meeting and led to the same conclusion, a denial of the CUP.27
The affected public walked away with no better understanding of the reasons why these group homes are hard to regulate due to the pressures put on cities by the State of California. The applicant ultimately filed suit against the city alleging violations of the Housing Element Law, Housing Accountability Act, and statutes governing antidiscrimination in local land use laws.

Nearly 200 people packed the Mission Viejo City Council chamber on March 29 for a Town Hall meeting regarding sober living homes. (Tomoya Shimura, Orange County Register, April 1, 2016) The City of Anaheim has not responded to the public concerns in an organized manner.

It has not provided an opportunity for the public to come together in a townhall-like meeting where the City could address the issues and the challenges they face, have subject matter experts on hand for short presentations, and allow for comments and questions.
28

Page 338 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 22 of 42
In direct contrast to Anaheim’s response, we can look at the steps taken by the Cities of Newport Beach and Laguna Hills. Newport Beach was faced with a petition from its residents in 2007 after a rapid increase in the number of drug rehabilitation homes. The residents reported 103 treatment houses, nearly all on the Balboa Peninsula. There was a town hall hosted by (then) Assemblywoman Mimi Walters, R-Laguna Niguel, and (then) State Senator Tom Harman, R-Huntington Beach, and an estimated 200 people attended. It was an opportunity for dialogue as well as to learn about the constraints placed on cities by the State of California. Newport Beach responded to resident concerns again in late 2021 by organizing a community meeting with speakers from several city departments, a State Assemblywoman, the District Attorney, and a County Supervisor.29 30
Hundreds attend the Sober Living Homes Town Hall meeting at the at the Laguna Hills Community Center on Thursday (Christopher Yee, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, May 13, 2016) We can also look at the steps taken by the City of Laguna Hills. In 2016, the City responded to public outcry regarding group home issues by hosting a Town Hall on the subject. The Town Hall was hosted by (then) State Senator Pat Bates and several other State and local legislators. Also in attendance were attorneys with extensive knowledge of the issue as well as other subject matter experts. More than 600 people attended, and it was an opportunity for the residents in attendance to gain a better understanding of the challenges the City faces in regulating unlicensed group homes, as well as for the City to hear the concerns and frustrations of attendees. Proving that, when cities work to

Page 339 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 23 of 42
inform their constituents, and allow for a robust but respectful dialogue, they create an opportunity for collaborative problem solving.31
How Has This Issue Evolved?
The timing of this investigation aligned with the required submission of the Housing Element portion of each city’s General Plan. The State’s disapproval of a city’s Housing Element carries heavy consequences, and the State of California has used the withholding of this needed approval to coerce cities to abandon their group home ordinances.

The Grand Jury was previously unaware of the power behind group home lobbyists and the number of proposed legislative bills that never made it to a vote. The State’s policymaking role limits a city’s ability to responsibly manage the integration of group homes and, as a consequence, the trajectory and focus of the study changed and widened with this knowledge. The Grand Jury looked at broader factors influencing the group home industry, its influence, its effect on communities and often its seeming lack of real concern about its clients. The group home industry is immense, requires improved relations with cities, and needs more effective local governmental oversight.

Page 340 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 24 of 42

FINDINGS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2022-2023 Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

Based on its investigation titled “Welcome to the Neighborhood - Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?” the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at eleven principal findings, as follows:

F1 Group homes too close to one another contribute to the problems associated with overconcentration.

F2 Common nuisances are more likely and disruptive when sober living homes are concentrated in a small geographic area of a neighborhood.

F3 Some cities have successfully addressed and informed community members about the challenges faced in regulating group homes.

F4 Community satisfaction was minimal when cities took the traditional public comment approach towards addressing community complaints.

F5 Cities are not utilizing police, fire, and code enforcement complaints as a means of locating and tracking Group Homes.

F6 Cities are inhibited from enacting and enforcing ordinances due to fears over the potential cost of litigation.

F7 Several cities have created an ordinance that requires a ministerial permit or registration to operate a group home, however many of these cities do not enforce their ordinances.

F8 City and County officials are deterred from regulating group homes by California Housing and Community Development’s housing element approval process.

F9 Cities have historically strategized and acted independently in addressing group home challenges and solutions.

F10 Well-operated group homes can integrate smoothly into neighborhoods.

F11 There is a lack of regulatory oversight for the health and safety of residents of unlicensed group homes.

Page 341 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 25 of 42

RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2022-2023 Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

Based on its investigation titled, “Welcome to the Neighborhood - Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?” the 2022-2023 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following five recommendations:

R1 Orange County cities and the County of Orange should address citizen concerns regarding group homes by providing an opportunity for an open dialog where an interdisciplinary panel of subject matter experts can share with attendees the challenges cities are facing in the management of group homes. To be implemented by July 1, 2024. (F3, F4)
R2 By December 31, 2024, Orange County cities and the County of Orange should collaborate in their efforts to create ordinances for the regulation of group homes, including the development of model ordinances. (F6, F7, F9) R3 Orange County cities and the County of Orange should pool resources for defense of lawsuits challenging group home ordinances. To be implemented by July 1, 2024. (F6, F8, F9)
R4 The County of Orange and Orange County cities should create a Task Force that includes representatives from OC cities, unincorporated areas, and other entities as appropriate and charge it with the responsibility of developing a plan to generate awareness among State legislators and regulators of the need for improved regulations and management standards to ensure health and safety for Group Home residents. To be implemented by July 1, 2024. (F2, F10, F11) R5 Orange County cities and the County of Orange should modify code enforcement report data collection forms to include a searchable field that enables the identification of a residence operating as a group home. To be implemented by July 1, 2024. (F5, F7, F11)

RESPONSES
California Penal Code Section 933 requires the governing body of any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court). Additionally, in the case of a report containing findings

Page 342 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 26 of 42
and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g., District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such elected County official shall comment on the findings and recommendations pertaining to the matters under that elected official’s control within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors.

Furthermore, California Penal Code Section 933.05 specifies the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made as follows:
(a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2)The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report.
(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department.

Page 343 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 27 of 42
The Orange County Grand Jury requires and requests the following responses:
90 Day Response Required
County of Orange Board of Supervisors F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 County of Orange Board of Supervisors R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 City Councils of:

Aliso Viejo F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Aliso Viejo R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Anaheim F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Anaheim R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Brea F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Brea R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Buena Park F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Buena Park R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Costa Mesa F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Costa Mesa R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Cypress F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Cypress R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Dana Point F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Dana Point R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Fountain Valley F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Fountain Valley R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Fullerton F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Fullerton R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Garden Grove F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Garden Grove R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Huntington Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Huntington Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Irvine F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Irvine R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
La Habra F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
La Habra R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
La Palma F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
La Palma R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Laguna Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Laguna Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Laguna Hills F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Laguna Hills R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Laguna Niguel F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Laguna Niguel R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Laguna Woods F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11

Page 344 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 28 of 42
Laguna Woods R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Lake Forest F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Lake Forest R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Los Alamitos F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, Los Alamitos R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Mission Viejo F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Mission Viejo R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Newport Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Newport Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Orange F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Orange R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Placentia F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Placentia R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Rancho Santa Margarita F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Rancho Santa Margarita R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
San Clemente F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 San Clemente R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
San Juan Capistrano F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 San Juan Capistrano R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Santa Ana F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Santa Ana R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Seal Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Seal Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Stanton F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Stanton R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Tustin F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11
Tustin R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Villa Park F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Villa Park R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Westminster F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Westminster R1, R2, R3, R4, R5
Yorba Linda F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 Yorba Linda R1, R2, R3, R4, R5

Page 345 ends

GLOSSARY
ADU
An accessory dwelling unit, usually just called an ADU, is a secondary housing unit on a single-family residential lot. These may be converted garages, backyard cottages, or granny flats, for example.

Brokering

A referral system where money or other inducements are exchanged by owners of disreputable homes to get new clients. The recipients may be residents, clinics, or even members of self-help groups such as AA12-step programs.

Code Enforcement
Activity by local government agencies to identify and correct problems and abuses by citizens and businesses.

Congregate Care Living
A residential home that offers inpatient services to its residents. Generally, the care that this institution provides is more intense than what a skilled nursing care facility offers but less intense than what a general acute care hospital provides.

Curbing
The act of evicting residents, often done late at night, so-called because they and their belongings are sent to the curb. Eviction may occur when such residents’ insurance runs out or for violating house rules. They frequently have nowhere to go and often have no resources, essentially rendering them homeless.

Deinstitutionalization
The closing (or reduction of services) of residential facilities, often referred to as mental hospitals, and the reliance on smaller, more personal “homes” as a means of rehabilitation.

Detox

Program or facility for assisting a person undergoing treatment from an intoxicating or addictive substance.

Page 346 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 30 of 42
EBT

Acronym for Electronic Benefit Transfer, previously known as Food Stamps, these are debit cards issued to eligible participants for the purpose of buying food and other necessities.

Emotional Wellness Homes
A facility where a person develops the ability to handle their emotions and varied experiences they encounter in life. Emotional wellness is an awareness, understanding, and acceptance of our feelings and the ability to manage and change challenges effectively.

Good Neighbor Policy
A set of principles and activities designed to provide a consistent means of communication between facilities that provide resident services and their respective neighbors. The Good Neighbor Policy is applicable for Residential Programs when residents and the services have a potential impact including but not limited to community safety, cleanliness, and security in the surrounding neighborhood(s).

Group Home (GH)*

A residential unit utilized as a supportive living environment for people meeting the legal definition of disabled. Provides housing only for a classified group of people. No medical care, services, or treatment can take place in a Group Home. Only State-licensed facilities can provide care, services, or treatment under State law (see Residential Care Facilities)
Hospice

A type of health care that focuses on the palliation of a terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life.

Hospice care prioritizes comfort and quality of life by reducing pain and suffering.

Housing Element

Since 1969, California has required that all local governments (cities and counties) adequately plan to meet the housing needs of everyone in the community. California’s local governments meet this requirement by adopting housing plans as part of their “general plan” (also required by the state). General plans serve as a local government’s "blueprint" for how the city and/or county will grow and develop and include eight elements: land use, transportation, conservation, noise, open space, safety, environmental justice, and housing.

Page 347 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 31 of 42
Integral Facilities

Integral facilities means any combination of two or more facilities located on the same or different parcels, collectively serving seven or more persons, not including the licensee or members of the licensee’s family or persons employed as facility staff, that are under the control or management of the same owner, operator, management company or licensee or any affiliate of any of them, and which together comprise one operation.

Integral facilities shall include, but not be limited to, the provision of housing in one facility and recovery programming, treatment, meals, or any other service or services at another facility, or facilities, or by assigning staff, or a consultant or consultants, to provide services to or in more than one facility.

Licensing

A permit from an authority to own or use something or to do a particular thing or carry on a trade. In reference to this report’s subject matter, licensing from a State or county agency or department.

Like-for-Like

Identifying the spacing of group homes by type, e.g., sober living within a given distance of sober living, assisted living within a given distance of assisted living, etc. Sober living near assisted living does not meet the like-for-like criteria.

Model Ordinance

A common set of policies and procedures developed by a government agency to oversee the licensing and operation of group homes.

NIMBY

Acronym for “Not in My Backyard”. A term used, among other things, to identify citizens who object to having group homes in their neighborhood.

Referral Facility

Either a Residential Care Facility, Group Home, or Sober Living Home where one or more person’s residency is per a court order or similar directive. Referral facilities must follow the permit procedure according to the base use classification, and are not permitted in the RL (Residential Low Density) zone.

Rehab Riviera

The nickname given to some sober living facilities in Southern California, referring to the climate. Often used as a selling point in advertising to emphasize the outdoor appeal of homes in the region.

Page 348 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 32 of 42
Rehabilitation

The action of restoring someone to health or normal life. Care that can help one get back, maintain or improve abilities.

Residential Care Facilities (RCF)*
A State Licensed residential facility where care, services, or treatment are provided to persons living in a community residential setting. Provide housing and care/treatment for the elderly, developmentally disabled, chronically ill, and chemical addiction treatment facilities, among others. RCFs that specifically provide drug and or alcohol abuse treatment are licensed by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and are known as alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities.

Homes are required to be licensed by the DHCS when at least one of the following services is provided: detoxification, group counseling sessions, individual counseling sessions, educational sessions, or alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment planning.

Residential Treatment Centers
Sometimes known as rehab which is a live-in health care facility providing services for substance use disorders, mental illness, or other behavioral problems.

Saturation
Having several group homes within a neighborhood.

Single Housekeeping Units
Individuals occupying a dwelling unit that have established ties and familiarity with each other; share a lease agreement, have consent of the owner to reside on the property, or own the property; jointly use common areas and interact with each other; and share the household expenses such as rent or ownership costs, utilities, and other household and maintenance costs activities.

Six or Under
Homes with six or fewer residents. Under State law these may not be required to be licensed or registered.

Sober Living Home (SLH)*
Sober Living Homes are also group homes, but specifically for people recovering from a chemical addiction that meets the legal definition of disabled. Provides “housing only” that is primarily meant for people who have just come out of rehab and need a

Page 349 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 33 of 42
place to live that is structured and supportive for those in recovery. For the purposes of the Ordinance, a Sober Living Home is not state licensed. No medical care, services, or treatment can occur in a Living Home. Only State licensed facilities can provide care, services, or treatment under State law (see Residential Care Facilities).

Tracking

A method to obtain data, monitor movements and a system to identify and map the location of group homes.

Treatment Center

A facility where a client or clients go under one roof for services to improve their physical or mental health. A residential treatment center (RTC), sometimes called rehab, is a live-in health care facility providing therapy for substances abuse use disorders, mental illness, or other behavioral problems. Residential treatment may be considered the “last-ditch” approach to treating abnormal psychology or psychopathology.
*For the purposes of this report, the City of Huntington Beach’s definitions of group living homes is being used as published on the city’s website.

Page 350 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 34 of 42

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Teri Sforza, Will U.S. Supreme Court engage on Costa Mesa’s sober living rules?, Orange County Register, Wednesday, March 15, 2023
Teri Sforza, Addiction centers flee Costa Mesa, move to less regulated OC cities, Orange County Register, Sunday, February 19, 2023
David Zisser, Letter from CA Department of Housing and Development to City of Huntington Beach Planning Department - RE “Ordinance to Ban “Builder’s Remedy” Projects under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) – Notice of Potential Violation”, California Department of Housing and Community Development web site, Monday, February 13, 2023 Ring Bender Law, SoCal Recovery and Raw Recovery v City of Costa Mesa: Amici Curiae Brief Of The League Of California Cities, The Association Of California Cities Of Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, Mission Viejo, And Orange In Support Of Appellee’s Petition For Rehearing En Banc, Court Filings, Thursday, February 9, 2023
Teri Sforza, Sober homes gain some ground in fight with Costa Mesa, Orange County Register, Sunday, January 15, 2023
Covenant Hills, Day Patient and Outpatient Addiction Treatment in Orange County, YouTube Posting, Friday, November 4, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Orange County Sober Living l Sober Living Near You in SoCal (kaizenhouserecovery.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Sober Living Homes for Men & W General Information omen - Orange County Recovery, Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Orange County Sober Living Homes | Sober Living Homes near me (ocsoberlivingbestsolution.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022 General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Drug Rehab Orange County - Lighthouse Treatment Center, Wednesday, October 19, 2022 General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Huntington Beach Rehab | Drug & Alcohol Substance Abuse Recovery (orangecountyrecovery.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022 General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Sober Living Homes in Southern California - Elysium Health Care, Wednesday, October 19, 2022

Page 351 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 35 of 42
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Zinnia Healing - Drug & Alcohol Rehab (serenitylodgelakearrowhead.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, California addiction rehab centers (sunshinebehavioralhealth.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Halfway Houses | ¾ way Houses | Sober Homes in California (addictionblog.org), Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, Requirements For California Rehabilitation and Sober Living Houses (hypogalblog.com), Wednesday, October 19, 2022
General Information, Links To Sober Living Group Homes, Advertisements And Blogs In Oc, A Place for Mom, Wednesday, October 19, 2022
Jeff Collins, These Southern California governments have approved housing plans, Orange County Register, Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Jeff Collins, Most Southern California cities miss complete new deadline to complete housing plans, Orange County Register, Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Alicia Robinson, Anaheim should allow home for homeless women with mental health issues, California Attorney General says, Orange County Register, Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Alicia Robinson, Anaheim should allow home for homeless women with mental health issues, California Attorney General says, Orange County Register, Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Public Notice – City of Mission Viejo, Council passes Sober Living and Group Home Ordinance to ensure such facilities operate with the confines of the law, City of Mission Viejo web site Home | City of Mission Viejo, Wednesday, August 24, 2022
Public Notice, Council passes Sober Living and Group Home Ordinance to ensure such facilities operate within the confines of the law, City of Mission Viejo website https://cityofmissionviejo.org/, Wednesday, August 24, 2022 Teri Sforza, Rehab Riviera: New law hopes to keep misleading rehabs from misleading patients, families patients, families, Orange County Register, Wednesday, August 24, 2022 Teri Sforza, California rehab doctor pleads guilty to insurance fraud, Orange County Register, Tuesday, August 16, 2022
Vanessa Serna, Real-life Frankenstein' Beverly Hills surgeon and his girlfriend plead guilty to $600 Million fraud scheme: Used 'body brokers' to find drug addicts to get unnecessary shots so

Page 352 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 36 of 42
they could bill insurance companies to fund their life of luxury, DailyMail.com, Tuesday, August 16, 2022
California Codes, Various Codes, California Code Search “Text” of the following– using “sober” and “living”., Monday, August 8, 2022
City of Laguna Beach Department of Community Development, City of Laguna Beach General Plan Housing Element, City of Laguna Beach Web Site 638115638915170000 (lagunabeachcity.net), Thursday, July 21, 2022
Matt Meyer, What is ‘California sober’ — and does it actually work?, Nexstar Media Inc Fox News San Diego, Saturday, June 25, 2022
Website Information Idea Flight, 9 Different Types of Group Home in California, Idea Flight Web Site Page 9 Different Types of Group Home in California - ideaflight, Friday, April 1, 2022 City of Westminster, Adopted Housing Element 2021-202-, City of Westminster website https://www.westminster-ca.gov/ , Wednesday, January 26, 2022 Scott D. Tenley and Kelly M. Hagemann of Michelman & Robinson LLP, Federal Authorities Have Their Eyes On Sober Living Home Operators And Marketers, Especially In Orange County, Mondaq web site, Friday, November 19, 2021
City of Newport Beach, Community Meeting on Group Residential Uses Meeting Summary, City of Newport Beach web site City of Newport Beach | Home newportbeachca.gov), Monday, October 11, 2021
City of Newport.Beach, Power Point from Community Meeting Sober Living Homes, Group Homes, and State Licensed Residential Care Facilities, City of Newport Beach web site City of Newport Beach | Home newportbeachca.gov), Monday, October 11, 2021 City Newport Beach, Document comparing City of Newport Beach Group Home Ordinance to City of Costa Mesa Group Home Ordinance, City of Newport Beach web site City of Newport Beach | Home newportbeachca.gov), Friday, September 24, 2021 Staff, How to Open a Sober Living Home in California, Blog Post at Sober Living App, Tuesday, May 11, 2021
Web Site Posting, How Much Profit Can Be Made From a Halfway House?, HALFWAY GROUP LLC website How Much Profit Can Be Made From A Halfway
House?.openupahalfwayhouse.com), Tuesday, February 2, 2021 County of Orange Press Release, Ending Rehab Riviera: Orange County First, County of Orange website, Thursday, October 1, 2020
County of Orange, County of Orange Group Home Ordinance, County of Orange website, Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Page 353 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 37 of 42
David Gorn, Doing the ‘sober-living dance’ on the Orange County coast, CalMatters, Tuesday, June 23, 2020
Elysia Richardson, Do Drug Treatment Centers Increase Local Crime Rates?, California Highlands Vista Drug Treatment Centers Web Site https://californiahighlandsvistas.com/blog/crimerates/, Monday, February 10, 2020 Orange County Public Works, Fact Sheet on Group Home Requirements, County of Orange website https://myoceservices.ocgov.com , Saturday, February 1, 2020 Michelle Mears, Orange County Tackles Homeless Issue by regulating Group Homes, Glove, Friday, September 27, 2019
Michelle Mears, Orange County Tackles Homeless Issue by Regulating Group Homes, California Globe, Friday, September 27, 2019
City of Newport Beach, Group Home List, City of Newport Beach web site City of Newport Beach | Home newportbeachca.gov), Thursday, September 19, 2019 Frank Kim, OC County Executive Officer, Memo regarding proposed ordinance to regulate Sober Living Homes, County of Orange Web Site, Wednesday, June 19, 2019 California Department of Social Services,.Overview of the Group Home Rate Classification Levels, DSS Website information sheet, Thursday, April 4, 2019 Miami-Dade County Form, Miami-Dade County Group Home Application, Miami-Dade County Website.Group Home Application-no aff disc 2019 (miamidade.gov), Monday, April 1, 2019 Steven P. Dinkin, Utilizing the Safe Streets Now playbook, San Diego Union-Tribune, Sunday, January 13, 2019
Brady P. Horn, Aakrit Joshi, Johanna Catherine Maclean, Substance Use Disorder Treatment Centers And Property Values, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Tuesday, January 1, 2019 Teri Sforza, New rehab laws may revamp addiction treatment in California, Orange County Register, Thursday, September 27, 2018
City of Laguna Niguel, Group Home Permit Application, City of Laguna Niguel website https://cityoflagunaniguel.org/ , Wednesday, July 4, 2018 William Leonard, Sober living homes in Orange County California, Sober Living Local, Saturday, May 5, 2018
Tony Saavedra, Teri Sforza, Death in rehab generates $7 million award, Orange County Register, Sunday, February 18, 2018
Teri Sforza, Tony Saavedra, Quest for sobriety often ends in sexual assault at some rehabs in Southern California, Orange County Register, Friday, January 19, 2018

Page 354 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 38 of 42
US Department of Health and Human Services, Ensuring Beneficiary Health and Safety in Group Homes Through State implementation, DHSS Web Site
https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/document/joint-report-ensuring-beneficiary-health-and-safetygroup-homes-through-state , Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Teri Sforza, Rehab Riviera: California testing Vermont’s model to fight addiction, Orange County Register, Friday, December 29, 2017
Teri Sforza, Tony Saavedra, Scott Schwebke, Rehab Riviera: Industry struggling to get clean, Orange County Register, Friday, December 29, 2017
Teri Sforza, Rehab Riviera: Are drugs for drug addicts a solution or a crutch?, Orange County Register, Thursday, December 28, 2017
Tony Saavedra, Scott Schwebke, How a multimillion-dollar empire built around urine drug tests exposes flaws in California’s rehab laws, Orange County Register, Sunday, December 17, 2017 Jordan Graham, Are drug rehab centers fueling homelessness in Southern California?, Orange County Register, Sunday, December 17, 2017
Teri Sforza, Are implants for opioid addicts a new hope or a new scam?, Orange County Register, Sunday, October 22, 2017
Teri Sforza, San Clemente’s ‘discriminatory’ rules on addiction treatment centers intact after suit settles, Orange County Register, Wednesday, July 5, 2017 Teri Sforza, California the over-regulator? Not for addiction treatment, Orange County Register, Friday, June 23, 2017
Teri Sforza, Addiction treatment: The new gold rush. ‘It’s almost chic’, Orange County Register, Friday, June 16, 2017
US Congress Committee on Energy and Commerce, Letter to Thomas E. Price, M.D. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Regarding problems resulting from the dramatic surge of addiction treatment centers and “sober living” homes, Congressional Record, Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Scott Schwebke, Teri Sforza, Federal agents search Sovereign Health rehab in San Clemente, elsewhere, Orange County Register, Tuesday, June 13, 2017 California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division, Power Point on Orange County Regional Office and what it does Newport Beach Meeting, Web Site of Department of Social Services www.ccld.ca.gov, Thursday, June 1, 2017 Teri Sforza, Detox can end in death at some ‘non-medical’ Southern California rehabs, Orange County Register, Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Page 355 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 39 of 42
Todd Harmonson, Sean Emery, O.C. District Attorney charges family, doctors with insurance fraud related to sober living homes, urine tests, Orange County Register, Tuesday, May 23, 2017 Teri Sforza, Tony Saavedra, Scott Schwebke, Lori Basheda, Mindy Schauer, Jeff Gritchen, Ian Wheeler, How some Southern California drug rehab addiction centers exploit addiction, Orange County Register, Sunday, May 21, 2017
Teri Sforza, Is there a link between neighborhood rehab programs and petty crime in California?, Orange County Register, Sunday, May 21, 2017 Staff Report, The Southern California rehab industry spans the nation, Orange County Register, Sunday, May 21, 2017
Jan Wheeler, Registered Rehabs Map, Orange County Register, Thursday, May 4, 2017 Mindy Schauer, Heroin’s hold: One man’s journey through the Southern California rehab industry, Orange County Register, Monday, May 1, 2017
CBS News, OC Neighbors Not Comfortable Next to Sober Living Homes, YouTube Posting, Tuesday, November 29, 2016
California Research Bureau, Sober Living Homes in California: Options for State and Local Regulation, California Research Bureau Publication in State Library https://www.library.ca.gov/crb/, Friday, October 7, 2016 Amy A. Mericle, Katherine J. Karriker-Jaffe,.Shalika Gupta, David M. Sheridan, Doug L. Polcin, Distribution and Neighborhood Correlates of Sober Living House Locations in Los Angeles, American Journal of Community Psychology, Thursday, September 1, 2016 Teri Sforza, California argues sober home ordinances are illegal, forcing cities to make expensive decisions, Orange County Register, Saturday, December 19, 2015 J Murphy - City of La Mesa Fact Sheet, Residential Care Facilities (or “Group Homes”) in the City of La Mesa, City of La Mesa website http://www.cityoflamesa.com , Thursday, October 29, 2015 County of Orange published guideline, Orange County Adult Alcohol And Drug Sober Living Facilities Certification Guidelines, County of Orange Sheriff Departments website, Monday, January 27, 2014
Sober Living by the Sea, Drug Rehab and Alcoholism Treatment OC CA by Sober Living by the Sea, YouTube Posting, Wednesday, May 23, 2012
You Get Me3, Santa Ana Sober Living Homes, YouTube Posting, Saturday, July 3, 2010 Paul J. Weinberg, Alcohol And Drug Rehab Homes classic Nimbyism Or Everyone's Fair Share, Thomson Reuters/West
Zoning and Planning Law Report, Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Page 356 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 40 of 42
City of Newport Beach, City of Newport Beach Residential Group Home Permit, City of Newport Beach web site City of Newport Beach | Home newportbeachca.gov), Friday, February 1, 2008 David DeBerry, Group Homes in the Neighborhood, Western City, Friday, September 1, 2006 NOTICE
Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

END NOTES
1 Group Homes in the Neighborhood David Debarry, Jeff Bellinger, Western City 09-01-2006 https://www.westerncity.com/article/group-homes-neighborhood 2 Ibid. Division of Housing Policy Development. “Group Home Technical Advisory.” California Department of Housing and Community Development, December 2022.
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/planning-and-community/group-home-technical-advisory2022.pdf 3 CA Health & Safety Code Section 1267.9
4 Sforza, Terri. “California the over-regulator? Not for addiction treatment.” Orange County Register, June 23, 2017. https://www.ocregister.c4om/2017/06/23/california-the-over-regulator-not-for-addictiontreatment 5 ibid . Division of Housing Policy Development. “Group Home Technical Advisory.” California Department of Housing and Community Development, December 2022. https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/planning-and-community/group-home-technical-advisory2022.pdf 6 Sforza, Terri. “California the over-regulator? Not for addiction treatment.” Orange County Register, June 23, 2017. https://www.ocregister.c6om/2017/06/23/california-the-over-regulator-not-for-addictiontreatment/ 7 California Research Bureau, Sober Living Homes in California: Options for State and Local Regulation, California Research Bureau Publication in State Library Friday, October 7, 2016, https://www.library.ca.gov/crb/,
8 CA Health & Safety Code Section 1267.9

Page 357 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 41 of 42
9Orange County Register Megan Nicolai, July 15, 2015, Newport Beach Settles legal battle over SoberLiving homes. 10 Orange County Register Megan Nicolai, July 15, 2015, Newport Beach Settles legal battle over SoberLiving homes. 11 Los Angeles Times Susannah Rosenblatt, May 22, 2008, Sober living homes rushing to meet Newport’s deadline.
12 Community Meeting on Group Residential Uses October 11, 2021 Meeting Summary https://nbpd.newportbeachca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/70754/637703409585700000 13 New regional task force will tackle issues with sober living and recovery homes,News Category, City of Mission Viejo Public Notices, September 1, 2022, new regional task force will tackle issues with sober living and recovery homes | City of Mission Viejo
14 Grandma’s House of Hope v. City of Anaheim and City Council of Anaheim Case No. 30-2022- 0124183-CU-WM-OJC
15 Newport Beach Ordinance 2008-05
16 Orange County Register Megan Nicolai, July 15, 2015, Newport Beach Settles legal battle over SoberLiving homes. 17 City of Costa Mesa Ordinance Chapter 13-3001
18 Orange County Register Article, May 21, 2021 – State argues sober home ordinances are illegal, forcing cities to make expensive decisions
19 $42 Billion U.S. Addiction Rehab Industry Poised for Growth, and Challenges (marketresearch.com) 20 Ca Department Of Housing And Community Development, Group Home Technical Advisory, dated December 2022
21 Housing Element Update, 2021-2029 Planning Period FAQ & Fact Sheet,City of Arcadia https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Development%20Services/planning/Housing%20 Element%20Update/FAQ/Housing%20Element%20Fact%20Sheet_FINAL.pdf 22 www.gov.ca.gov/2021/09/28/governor-newsom-signs-legislation 23 Growing List of Penalties for Local Governments Failing to Meet State Housing Law, Association of Bay Area Governments, June 2021, https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021- 06/Consequences%20of%20Non-Compliance%20with%20Housing%20Laws.pdf 24 Housing Element Update, 2021-2029 Planning Period FAQ & Fact Sheet,City of Arcadia https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Development%20Services/planning/Housing%20 Element%20Update/FAQ/Housing%20Element%20Fact%20Sheet_FINAL.pdf 25 Housing Element Update, 2021-2029 Planning Period FAQ & Fact Sheet,City of Arcadia https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Development%20Services/planning/Housing%20 Element%20Update/FAQ/Housing%20Element%20Fact%20Sheet_FINAL.pdf

Page 358 ends

WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 42 of 42
26 Walker, Theresa OC Register 10-25-2021 Housing for mentally ill homeless women draws heated Anaheim response
https://www.ocregister.com/2021/10/25/housing-for-mentally-ill-homeless-women-draws-heated-anaheimresponse/ 27 Grandma’s House of Hope v. City of Anaheim and City Council of Anaheim Case No. 30-2022- 0124183-CU-WM-OJC
28 City of Anaheim Planning Commission,PC Action Packets 8-30-2021 https://records.anaheim.net/CityClerk/DocView.aspx?id=2428318&dbid=0&repo=CITYOFANAHEIM 29 Many attend town hall on rehab houses,OC Register, 2-23-2007 Many attend Newport town hall on rehab houses – Orange County Register (ocregister.com) 30 Ibid. Many attend town hall on rehab houses
31 Sober Living Homes Town Hall

Page 359 ends

Page 360 ends

Page 361 ends

Page 362 ends

Page 363 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Amendment to Contract #CON-19-19: Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab – Senior Transportation Provider

THREE-YEAR STRATEGIC GOAL
☒ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Fountain Valley offers the “Hop On” Senior Transportation Program through the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Senior Mobility Program (SMP). The Community Services Department recently received a letter from Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab, the City’s current transportation provider for this program, requesting an increase to their current fee from $12.00 to $17.50 per trip per passenger due to inflation. Since that time, staff conducted a survey of other local agencies and confirmed that this increase was consistent with other Orange County cities using Cabco for their senior transportation programs.

The current contract with California Yellow Cab states the fixed fee of $12.00 per trip per passenger, therefore a contract amendment would be necessary to increase the rate.

Staff recommends the requested increase to $17.50 per trip in order to provide timely and efficient transportation services to seniors in our community at no additional impact to the City’s approved FY 2023-24 budget.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Fountain Valley’s “Hop On” Senior Transportation Program provides residents 60 years of age and older with curb-to-curb transportation within the City seven (7) days a week, 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. The program is an essential service that provides seniors with

Page 364 ends

access to the goods, services, and social contacts that support their day-to-day existence and quality of life. From July 2022 – June 2023, a total of 3,668 one-way rides were provided equating to 8,336 total miles.

Currently, the City of Fountain Valley contracts with Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab to provide transportation. Our current contract states “City agrees to pay consultant a fixed fee of $12.00 per trip per passenger…” This contract expires on June 30, 2024 so a contract amendment would be necessary to increase the fee to the requested $17.50 per trip per passenger.

In 2019, California Yellow Cab was the only transportation company to submit during the Request for Proposal process for senior transportation. At present, out of the 37 organizations that provide senior transportation, 19 organizations provide transportation through a taxi service, all of which who use California Yellow Cab. Should the City Council not approve the increase, CYC will continue services at the existing rates until the contract is sent out to bid in preparation for its expiration on June 30, 2024 and hope drivers remain servicing the program as usual without the increased rate. However, availability of rides in Fountain Valley may be lessened as drivers choose to be in higher populated areas with more ridership and increased rates.

Throughout the next year, in preparation for the contract expiration, staff will extensively research alternative transportation options to ensure the program continues to provide the seniors with the best service possible also being fiscally responsible.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Funding for the “HOP ON!” Senior Transportation Program is derived from Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 funding and a required City of Fountain Valley General Fund match of 20 percent. In 2006, OCTA M2 was approved by local voters and is Orange County’s half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements, including Project U, which provides funding for seniors/disabled persons. One percent of net sales tax revenue is allocated to participating cities based upon the percentage of the senior population of the city as determined by the most current decennial Census information. Measure M2 covers 80% of the cost, and the City’s required match of 20% is covered by a current agreement with MemorialCare Orange Coast Medical Center (MCOCMC) and by co-pay fares paid by the rider.

From July 2022 through June 2023, at the current rate of $12.00 per trip, the total trip cost was $44,016. At the increased rate of $17.50 per trip, for the same amount of trips and time period, the total would be $64,190, an annual program increase of $20,174.

The approved budget for the 2023-24 transportation program is $103,500, but the cost to the City would remain unchanged, as the program costs are covered by Measure M2 and MemorialCare funds. Due to decreased ridership in the “Hop On” Senior Transportation Program since the COVID-19 pandemic, ample funds from these sources are available to accommodate for this increase. As of June 30, 2022, the current balance of SMP funds was $190,155.

Page 365 ends

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

Attorney for the City has reviewed this item
ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No.1: Approve the Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab contract amendment to increase fee to $17.50 per trip per passenger.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve this contract amendment RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, Approve the Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab contract amendment to increase fee to $17.50 per trip per passenger.

Prepared By: Jenni Worsham, Community Services Manager
Approved By: Rob Frizzelle, Community Services Director Fiscal Review by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved By: Maggie Le, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab contract amendment

2. Cabco Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab fee increase request letter

Page 366 ends

CONTRACT NO. 19-19
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 19-19

BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND
CABCO YELLOW, INC.

FOR SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 is made and entered into this 15th day of August 2023 by and between the City of Fountain Valley (hereinafter CITY), a municipal corporation, and the Cabco Yellow, Inc., (hereinafter CONSULTANT).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT originally entered into an Agreement for Senior Transportation Services on July 1, 2019, attached hereto as Attachment “A” (“AGREEMENT”);
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has requested a fee increase;
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has proven itself as a responsible provider; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the AGREEMENT to increase CONSULTANT’s pay beginning September 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto AGREE as follows:

1. Beginning September 1, 2023, and for the remainder of the TERM of the AGREEMENT, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fixed fee of $17.50 per trip per passenger, except for caregivers for which the additional passenger fee will be $0.00. This amount shall not exceed one-hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) per year, without written approval by the City Manager.

2. Except as expressly modified herein, the terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, as the same have been modified by amendments thereto, shall remain in effect.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 1 the year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

____________________________ ______________________________ Deputy City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CABCO YELLOW, INC.:
______________________________ _______________________________ Attorneys for the City President

Page 367 ends

Page 368 ends

Page 369 ends

Page 370 ends

Page 371 ends

Page 372 ends

Page 373 ends

Page 374 ends

Page 375 ends

Page 376 ends

Page 377 ends

Page 378 ends

Page 379 ends

Page 380 ends

Page 381 ends

Page 382 ends

Page 383 ends

Page 384 ends

Page 385 ends

Page 386 ends

Page 387 ends

Page 388 ends

Page 389 ends

Page 390 ends

Page 391 ends

Page 392 ends

Page 393 ends

Page 394 ends

Page 395 ends

Page 396 ends

Page 397 ends

Page 398 ends

Page 399 ends

Page 400 ends

Page 401 ends

Page 402 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
To: Honorable Mayor and Agenda Date: August 15, 2023
Members of the City Council
SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Athens Administrators for Third Party Claims Administration Services Regarding Excess and Tail Workers Compensation Claims Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☐ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☒ Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On April 4, 2023, the City Council voted to approve the switch from PRISM to CalJPIA as the city’s insurance carrier, for all programs. However, the Workers Compensation program was with a separate carrier, Brown & Brown Insurance. To keep all insurance programs under one group, the city agreed to enter into the Worker’s Compensation program provided by CalJPIA at the June 20, 2023 meeting.

The move to the CalJPIA Workers Comp Program also included the Third Party Administrator Services with Athens Administrators.

DISCUSSION:

As the City approved the move in Workers Compensation insurance Carrier from Brown and Brown to CalJPIA, the Third party Administrator for Workers Compensation Claims was also going to change.

The switch in Workers Compensation Carrier programs created a necessary change from Adminsure as the city’s current Third party Administrator, to Athens. In order to keep Workers Compensation claims moving, the Human Resources Director requested an extension with Adminsure for 6 months for an amount not to exceed $49,999, which the City Manager approved.

The 6 month extension granted for Adminsure was established to give the Human Resources Department time to establish services with Athens Administrators for all new and old claims. While any new claims received as of July 1, 2023 were automatically assumed by Athens Administrators, any claims prior to July 1, 2023 were still being processed by Adminsure. The Risk Administrator and Human Resources Director have been working with Athens to get all former claims transitioned over from Adminsure, to Athens, so all Workers Compensation claims are being handled by one Third Party Administrator.

Page 403 ends

The agreement presented for council’s approval would officially begin on September 1st, with Athens assuming all former Workers Compensation claims that Adminsure have been handling. Athens comes highly regarded in their services and the Human Resources Director vetted their services with other agencies that use them. Their quality of service on claims handling is highly regarded and will greatly improve our claims handling process for the Human Resources Department.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The contract for excess and tail claims services with Athens will be for 2 years and 10 months, commencing on September 1, 2023. The table below shows the annual cost for tail claims services.

Pricing Option 1 - FLAT ANNUAL FEE Flat Annual Fee
Program Year 1 9/1/2023 6/30/2024 10 Months $77,690
Program Year 2 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 12 Months $53,200
Program Year 3 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 12 Months $40,296
The current fiscal year 2023-24 adopted budget includes $92,000 for third-party claims administrator services. The City has paid Adminsure $14,230 for the first 2 months of the fiscal year, leaving $77,770 remaining in the budget for the final 10 months of services. Therefore, sufficient funding exists in the current adopted budget for program year 1 with Athens. Program years 2 and 3 will be accounted for in those upcoming annual budgets. The pricing above reflects Athens taking over all historical claims of which 33 are indemnity cases, 22 are future medical and 5 are medical only claims. The total cost of the tail claims services with Athens would be $138,186 after subtracting the already budgeted and not spent money that was approved for Adminsure.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

Attorney for the City has reviewed this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No. 1: Approve the tail claims services with Athens for the 2 years and 10 months agreement
Alternative No. 2: Direct staff to take an alternate action and do not approve the agreement.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1, Approve the tail claims services with Athens for the 2 years and 10 months agreement.

Prepared by: Rick Miller, City Clerk / Administrator
Reviewed by: Colin Burns, Attorney for the City
Reviewed by: Ryan Smith, Finance Director
Approved by: Maggie le, City manager
Attachment:

1. Agreement with Athens Administrators

Page 404 ends

Page 405 ends

Page 406 ends

Page 407 ends

Page 408 ends

Page 409 ends

Page 410 ends

Page 411 ends

Page 412 ends

Page 413 ends

Page 414 ends

Page 415 ends

Page 416 ends

Page 417 ends

Page 418 ends

CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

ACTION REQUEST
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members Agenda Date: August 15, 2023 of the City Council
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Amending the Salary Schedule to Increase the Compensation of the City Manager
Three-Year Strategic Goals
☐ Enhance the culture and environment of “A Nice Place to Live” ☐ Achieve fiscal stability by evaluating processes, and attract and retain revenue producing businesses/opportunities
☒ Attract and retain quality staff through best practices and trends ☐ Maintain, build, and modernize infrastructure to support growth and future needs of the City
☐ Not applicable
DISCUSSION:

The City Manager successfully completed her first year as City Manager, following years of service with the City in other high-level management positions. Following a performance review, the City Council determined to increase the City Manager’s compensation in consideration of her performance and accomplishments over the previous twelve months.

Pursuant to Section 4.01 of the City Manager’s MOU: “… Increases in CITY MANAGER’s annual base salary approved by the City Council shall not require an amendment to this AGREEMENT to be effective. Such increases shall be set forth in a Resolution approved by the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council.” The Resolution brought for Council approval amends the City’s Comprehensive Salary Schedule to increase the City Manager’s base salary from $250,000 to $264,600.

Consistent with other employee groups, the effective date is the first day of the pay period that contains July 1, 2023.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Page 419 ends

City Council Action Request
Amended Salary Resolution
August 15, 2023

Page 2 ends

The current adopted budget includes $250,000 for the City Manager’s salary. The proposed increase was not included in the FY 2023-24 adopted budget and would require a budget amendment. Staff will reevaluate the budgetary needs related to this item in January 2024 and include any necessary budget amendments with the FY 2023-24 MidYear Budget.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

This item was agendized in compliance with the Brown Act and has been placed on the agenda of a regular meeting of the City Council as an administrative item. An oral report on the salary increase will be made during the meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:

Not applicable.

ATTORNEY REVIEW:

The Attorney for the City prepared this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

Alternative No.1: Approve the resolution amending the City’s salary schedule to increase the City Manager’s base salary as shown on the attached resolution.

Alternative No. 2: Do not approve the resolution.

Prepared By: Colin Burns, Attorney for the City
Attachment 1: Resolution Amending City’s Salary Schedule

Page 420 ends

ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

FOUNTAIN VALLEY RELATING TO THE

CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION

COMPREHENSIVE SALARY SCHEDULE OF CITY

EMPLOYEES AND SUPERSEDING ALL PROVISIONS
CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO. XXXX AND ALL

SUBSEQUENT SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTIONS,

WHICH PERTAIN TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND
COMPENSATION OF CITY EMPLOYEES.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley hereby establishes a basic compensation plan for City employees in all of the classifications of employment as described in this resolution; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the City Council and the City Manager or the City Manager and representatives of the bargaining groups and unrepresented units noted below periodically negotiate in good faith to reach agreement on benefits and compensation pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et seq; and Employee Unit Name
Fountain Valley Firefighters’ IAFF Local 4530
Individually Represented Battalion Chiefs
Fountain Valley Police Officers’ Association
Police Officers’ Management Unit
Professional/Technical Unit
Fountain Valley General Employees’ Association
Fountain Valley Municipal Employees’ Association
Non-Represented Professional/Technical Employees
Administrative Officers
Part-Time Employees

Page 421 ends

Resolution of the City Council
Comprehensive Salary Schedule
August 15, 2023
- 2 -
WHEREAS, the City maintains a comprehensive salary resolution of each paid City classification and their corresponding salary range; and WHEREAS, the comprehensive salary resolution is updated periodically to include any negotiated adjustments to the salary range for a classification, title changes to an existing classification, reclassification or deletion of existing classifications, or new classifications; and
WHEREAS, the City has adjusted the salary for the City Manager effective in the pay period including July 1, 2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. All provisions shall be effective as noted in Exhibit 1 for each classification.

SECTION 2. The salary ranges and hourly rate ranges as specified in Exhibit 1 for paid City classifications for employees are hereby established or reestablished. ///
///
///
///
///
///
///

Page 422 ends

Resolution of the City Council
Comprehensive Salary Schedule
August 15, 2023
- 3 -
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley at a regular meeting on this 15th day of August 2023.
__________________________
Kim Constantine, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
__________________________
Colin Burns
Attorneys for the City
Attachment: 1. Exhibit - Salary Schedule

Page 423 ends

Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Annual 93,130.13 $ 97,786.63 $ 102,675.97 $ 107,809.76 $ 113,200.25 $ Monthly 7,760.69 $ 8,148.73 $ 8,556.17 $ 8,983.97 $ 9,433.17 $ Bi-weekly 3,581.93 $ 3,761.02 $ 3,949.08 $ 4,146.53 $ 4,353.86 $ Hourly 44.77 $ 47.01 $ 49.36 $ 51.83 $ 54.42 $
Annual 88,695.36 $ 93,130.13 $ 97,786.63 $ 102,675.97 $ 107,809.76 $ Monthly 7,391.14 $ 7,760.69 $ 8,148.73 $ 8,556.17 $ 8,983.97 $ Bi-weekly 3,411.36 $ 3,581.93 $ 3,761.02 $ 3,949.08 $ 4,146.53 $ Hourly 42.64 $ 44.77 $ 47.01 $ 49.36 $ 51.83 $
Annual 114,489.86 $ 120,214.35 $ 126,225.07 $ 132,536.32 $ 139,163.14 $ Monthly 9,540.64 $ 10,017.67 $ 10,518.55 $ 11,044.48 $ 11,596.70 $ Bi-weekly 4,403.46 $ 4,623.63 $ 4,854.81 $ 5,097.55 $ 5,352.43 $ Hourly 55.04 $ 57.80 $ 60.69 $ 63.72 $ 66.91 $
Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Annual 140,284.35 $ 147,298.57 $ 154,663.50 $ 162,396.67 $ 170,516.51 $ Monthly 11,690.14 $ 12,274.64 $ 12,888.38 $ 13,532.80 $ 14,209.44 $ Bi-weekly 5,395.55 $ 5,665.33 $ 5,948.60 $ 6,246.03 $ 6,558.33 $ Hourly 67.44 $ 70.82 $ 74.36 $ 78.08 $ 81.98 $
Annual 160,080.13 $ 168,084.13 $ 176,488.34 $ $ 185,312.76 $ 194,578.40 Monthly $ 13,339.75 $ 14,006.74 $ 14,707.08 $ 15,442.43 $ 16,214.55 Bi-weekly $ 6,156.93 $ 6,464.77 $ 6,788.01 $ 7,127.41 $ 7,483.78 Hourly $ 76.96 $ 80.81 $ 84.85 $ 89.09 $ 93.55
Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Annual $ 80,712.78 $ 84,748.42 $ 88,985.84 $ 93,435.13 $ 98,106.89 Monthly $ 6,726.06 $ 7,062.37 $ 7,415.48 $ 7,786.26 $ 8,175.57 Bi-weekly $ 3,104.34 $ 3,259.55 $ 3,422.53 $ 3,593.66 $ 3,773.34 Hourly $ 27.72 $ 30.56 29.10 $ 32.09 $ 33.69 $
Annual $ 92,410.28 $ 97,030.80 $ 101,882.34 $ 106,976.45 $ 112,325.27 Monthly $ 7,700.85 $ 8,085.90 $ 8,490.19 $ 8,914.70 $ 9,360.44 Bi-weekly $ 3,554.24 $ 3,731.95 $ 3,918.55 $ 4,114.48 $ 4,320.20 Hourly $ 31.73 $ 34.99 33.32 $ 36.74 $ 38.57 $
Annual $ 93,340.08 $ 98,007.09 $ 102,907.44 $ 108,052.81 $ 113,455.45 Monthly $ 7,778.34 $ 8,167.26 $ 8,575.62 $ 9,004.40 $ 9,454.62 Bi-weekly $ 3,590.00 $ 3,769.50 $ 3,957.98 $ 4,155.88 $ 4,363.67 Hourly $ 32.05 $ 35.34 33.66 $ 37.11 $ 38.96 $
Annual $ 108,126.93 $ 113,533.27 $ 119,209.94 $ 125,170.44 $ 131,428.96 Monthly $ 9,010.57 $ 9,461.10 $ 9,934.16 $ 10,430.87 $ 10,952.41 Bi-weekly $ 4,158.73 $ 4,366.66 $ 4,585.00 $ 4,814.25 $ 5,054.96 Hourly $ 37.13 $ 40.94 38.99 $ 42.98 $ 45.13 $
Annual $ 129,143.87 $ 135,601.07 $ 142,381.12 $ 149,500.17 $ 156,975.18 Monthly $ 10,761.78 $ 11,299.87 $ 11,864.87 $ 12,458.11 $ 13,081.01 Bi-weekly $ 4,967.07 $ 5,215.43 $ 5,476.20 $ 5,750.01 $ 6,037.51 Hourly $ 62.09 $ 68.45 65.19 $ 71.88 $ 75.47 $
Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Annual 151,167.74 $ 158,726.13 $ 166,662.44 $ 174,995.56 $ 183,745.34 $ Monthly 12,597.31 $ 13,227.17 $ 13,888.53 $ 14,582.96 $ 15,312.11 $ Bi-weekly 5,814.14 $ 6,104.85 $ 6,410.09 $ 6,730.60 $ 7,067.13 $ Hourly 51.91 $ $ 57.23 54.51 $ 60.09 $ 63.10 $
Annual $ 164,754.84 $ 172,992.59 $ 181,642.22 $ 190,724.33 $ 200,260.54 Monthly $ 13,729.57 $ 14,416.04 $ 15,136.85 $ 15,893.69 $ 16,688.37 Bi-weekly $ 6,336.72 $ 6,653.56 $ 6,986.24 $ 7,335.55 $ 7,702.33 Hourly $ 56.58 $ 62.38 59.41 $ 65.50 $ 68.77 $
Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Annual 85,331.79 $ 89,598.38 $ 94,078.30 $ 98,782.22 $ 103,721.33 $ Monthly 7,110.85 $ 7,466.39 $ 7,839.71 $ 8,231.69 $ 8,643.28 $ Bi-weekly 3,281.99 $ 3,446.09 $ 3,618.40 $ 3,799.32 $ 3,989.28 $ Hourly 41.02 $ $ 45.23 43.08 $ 47.49 $ 49.87 $
Annual $ 139,063.18 $ 146,016.34 $ 153,317.16 $ 160,983.02 $ 169,032.17 Monthly $ 11,588.38 $ 12,167.79 $ 12,776.18 $ 13,414.99 $ 14,085.74 Bi-weekly $ 5,348.58 $ 5,616.01 $ 5,896.81 $ 6,191.65 $ 6,501.24 Hourly $ 66.86 $ 73.71 70.20 $ 77.40 $ 81.27 $
Annual $ 87,474.19 $ 91,847.90 $ 96,440.30 $ 101,262.31 $ 106,325.43 Monthly $ 7,289.38 $ 7,653.84 $ 8,036.54 $ 8,438.36 $ 8,860.28 Bi-weekly $ 3,364.39 $ 3,532.61 $ 3,709.24 $ 3,894.70 $ 4,089.44 Hourly $ 42.05 $ 46.37 44.16 $ 48.68 $ 51.12 $
Annual $ 89,145.26 $ 93,602.53 $ 98,282.65 $ 103,196.79 $ 108,356.63 Monthly $ 7,428.63 $ 7,800.06 $ 8,190.06 $ 8,599.57 $ 9,029.55 Bi-weekly $ 3,428.66 $ 3,600.10 $ 3,780.10 $ 3,969.11 $ 4,167.56 Hourly $ 42.86 $ 47.25 45.00 $ 49.61 $ 52.09 $
Annual $ 161,922.59 $ 170,018.72 $ 178,519.66 $ 187,445.64 $ 196,817.92 Monthly $ 13,493.29 $ 14,167.95 $ 14,876.35 $ 15,620.17 $ 16,401.18 Bi-weekly $ 6,227.79 $ 6,539.18 $ 6,866.14 $ 7,209.45 $ 7,569.92 Hourly $ 77.85 $ 85.83 81.74 $ 90.12 $ 94.62 $
City Council Meeting 8/15/2023
EFF 7/1/2023
P&T 7/1/2023
Engineer
P&T 7/1/2023 P50 Deputy Public Works Director/City
P&T 7/1/2023 P46 Crime Analyst
P09 Community Services Supervisor
P&T 7/1/2023 P57 Building Official
P&T 7/1/2023 P67 Associate Planner
Bargaining Effective Class Classification
BC 7/1/2023 P56 Division Chief
BC 7/1/2023 P23 Battalion Chief
Bargaining Effective Class Classification
FVFA 7/1/2023 F06 Administrative Fire Captain
FVFA 7/1/2023 F01 Fire Captain
FVFA 7/1/2023 F02 Fire Engineer
FVFA 7/1/2023 F04 Firefighter/Paramedic
FVFA 7/1/2023 F03 Firefighter
Bargaining Effective Class Classification
POMU 7/1/2023 O01 Police Captain
POMU 7/1/2023 O02 Police Lieutenant
Bargaining Effective Class Classification
POA 7/1/2023 O03 Police Sergeant
POA 7/1/2023 O04 Police Officer
Bargaining Unit Codes:

POA: Fountain Valley Police Officers' Association
POMU: Fountain Valley Peace Officers' Management Unit
FVFA: Fountain Valley Firefighters' Association IAFF Local 4530 BC: Individually Represented Battalion Chiefs
P&T: Professional/Technical Unit
IRP&T: Individually Represented Professional/Technical Employee FVGEA: Fountain Valley General Employees' Association
FVMEA: Fountain Valley Municipal Employees' Association DD: Department Directors (non-represented)
PT: Part-time employees (non-represented)
Bargaining Effective Class Classification
POA 7/1/2023 O08 Corporal

Page 424 ends

Fountain Valley City CouncilAugust 15, 2023

Fountain Valley City Council
August 15, 2023