3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.5032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e0030.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Total 0.5064 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5000e0041.5000e0041.9100e0031.0000e0057.0000e0040.0000 7.0000e0041.9000e0040.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.5430 0.5430 2.0000e0051.0000e0050.5478 Total 2.5000e0041.5000e0041.9100e0031.0000e0057.0000e0040.0000 7.0000e0041.9000e0040.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.5430 0.5430 2.0000e0051.0000e0050.5478 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2086 0.3857 2.4540 6.8600e0030.7382 4.9900e0030.7432 0.1967 4.6500e0030.2014 0.0000 653.1478 653.1478 0.0476 0.0317 663.7697 Unmitigated 0.2094 0.3913 2.4905 7.0000e0030.7532 5.0800e0030.7583 0.2007 4.7400e0030.2055 0.0000 666.0493 666.0493 0.0483 0.0321 676.8352
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641 Total 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 48.40 15.90 35.70 86 11 3 Improve Pedestrian Network
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.527700 0.209000 0.167500 0.055600 0.000900 0.000900 0.008000 0.021400 0.000000 0.004300 0.002500 0.000200 0.002000
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 54.5958 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 54.5958 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356 NaturalGas
Mitigated
9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
1.77878e
+006
9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865 Total 9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
1.77878e
+006
9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865 Total 9.5900e0030.0820 0.0349 5.2000e0046.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0036.6300e0030.0000 94.9224 94.9224 1.8200e0031.7400e00395.4865 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
590073 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356
Total 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
590073 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356
Total 54.5958 8.8300e0031.0700e00355.1356
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6983 0.0340 0.5610 2.1000e0045.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0030.0000 32.9549 32.9549 1.4800e0035.9000e00433.1669 Unmitigated 0.6983 0.0340 0.5610 2.1000e0045.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0030.0000 32.9549 32.9549 1.4800e0035.9000e00433.1669
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0503 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
0.6282 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 3.2400e0030.0277 0.0118 1.8000e0042.2400e0032.2400e0032.2400e0032.2400e0030.0000 32.0574 32.0574 6.1000e0045.9000e00432.2479 Landscaping 0.0165 6.3300e0030.5492 3.0000e0053.0400e0033.0400e0033.0400e0033.0400e0030.0000 0.8975 0.8975 8.6000e0040.0000 0.9191 Total 0.6983 0.0340 0.5610 2.1000e0045.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0030.0000 32.9549 32.9549 1.4700e0035.9000e00433.1669 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0503 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
0.6282 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 3.2400e0030.0277 0.0118 1.8000e0042.2400e0032.2400e0032.2400e0032.2400e0030.0000 32.0574 32.0574 6.1000e0045.9000e00432.2479 Landscaping 0.0165 6.3300e0030.5492 3.0000e0053.0400e0033.0400e0033.0400e0033.0400e0030.0000 0.8975 0.8975 8.6000e0040.0000 0.9191 Total 0.6983 0.0340 0.5610 2.1000e0045.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0035.2800e0030.0000 32.9549 32.9549 1.4700e0035.9000e00433.1669 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
Unmitigated 4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
4.8214 /
3.03958
4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
Total 4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
4.8214 /
3.03958
4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
Total 4.9277 0.1577 3.7800e0039.9944
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Unmitigated 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
85.32 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Total 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
85.32 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Total 17.3192 1.0235 0.0000 42.9076
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 34 Date: 10/13/2021 11:41 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied TSM 21-0015
Fresno County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Gross acreage used. Square footage based on lot size multiplied by minimum FAR of 0.2. Population based on Housing Element persons per household.
Grading - Assumes site is balanced.
Demolition - Assumes 4,000 square feet of buildings to be demolished.
Architectural Coating - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601 applies.
Fleet Mix - Assumes 2024 SJVAPCD Residential Fleet Mix
Woodstoves - No woodstoves per Rule 4901
Area Coating - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project submit to a Dust Control Plan.
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 74.00 Dwelling Unit 29.04 160,851.00 237
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Area Mitigation - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601
2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 150.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 150 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 150 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix LDA 0.52 0.53
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.21
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 9.0000e-004
tblFleetMix LHD2 6.8290e-003 9.0000e-004
tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 2.5000e-003
tblFleetMix MDV 0.16 0.06
tblFleetMix MH 2.9750e-003 2.0000e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 8.0000e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 7.0700e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.4960e-003 2.0000e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.8900e-004 4.3000e-003
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 133,200.00 160,851.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 24.03 29.04
tblLandUse Population 212.00 237.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 3.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 3.70 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.7028 38.8863 29.6401 0.0636 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,168.152 8 6,168.152
8 1.9487 0.0322 6,218.117
8 2023 1.6783 14.7719 17.0848 0.0306 0.2760 0.7030 0.9791 0.0745 0.6615 0.7360 0.0000 2,930.707 7 2,930.707
7 0.6142 0.0307 2,955.207
9 2024 28.9540 13.8247 16.9470 0.0305 0.2760 0.6166 0.8926 0.0745 0.5800 0.6544 0.0000 2,923.055 3 2,923.055
3 0.7167 0.0299 2,947.207
9 Maximum 28.9540 38.8863 29.6401 0.0636 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,168.152 8 6,168.152
8 1.9487 0.0322 6,218.117
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.7028 38.8863 29.6401 0.0636 8.9935 1.6357 10.6068 4.5853 1.5049 6.0696 0.0000 6,168.152 8 6,168.152
8 1.9487 0.0322 6,218.117
8 2023 1.6783 14.7719 17.0848 0.0306 0.2760 0.7030 0.9791 0.0745 0.6615 0.7360 0.0000 2,930.707 7 2,930.707
7 0.6142 0.0307 2,955.207
9 2024 28.9540 13.8247 16.9470 0.0305 0.2760 0.6166 0.8926 0.0745 0.5800 0.6544 0.0000 2,923.055 3 2,923.055
3 0.7167 0.0299 2,947.207
9 Maximum 28.9540 38.8863 29.6401 0.0636 8.9935 1.6357 10.6068 4.5853 1.5049 6.0696 0.0000 6,168.152 8 6,168.152
8 1.9487 0.0322 6,218.117
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.11 0.00 46.42 53.99 0.00 42.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Energy 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mobile 1.4946 2.0818 15.4772 0.0423 4.3489 0.0286 4.3774 1.1565 0.0266 1.1832 4,428.919 0 4,428.919
0 0.2913 0.1946 4,494.190
9 Total 5.5276 3.2763 22.0581 0.0498 4.3489 0.1533 4.5021 1.1565 0.1514 1.3079 0.0000 5,875.131 5 5,875.131
5 0.3294 0.2209 5,949.195
8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Energy 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mobile 1.4900 2.0522 15.2311 0.0414 4.2619 0.0281 4.2899 1.1334 0.0262 1.1596 4,342.909 6 4,342.909
6 0.2869 0.1916 4,407.179
7 Total 5.5230 3.2468 21.8120 0.0489 4.2619 0.1528 4.4146 1.1334 0.1509 1.2843 0.0000 5,789.122 0 5,789.122
0 0.3250 0.2179 5,862.184
6 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2022 2/11/2022 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/12/2022 3/11/2022 5 20 3 Grading Grading 3/12/2022 5/13/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 5/14/2022 1/19/2024 5 440 5 Paving Paving 1/20/2024 3/8/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/9/2024 4/26/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.08 0.90 1.12 1.65 2.00 0.33 1.94 2.00 0.32 1.81 0.00 1.46 1.46 1.33 1.35 1.46 Residential Indoor: 325,723; Residential Outdoor: 108,574; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 30
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 135
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 18.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 27.00 8.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.1313 1.2427 1.3739 0.0199 1.1553 1.1751 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.3000e0030.0876 0.0173 3.7000e0040.0105 9.1000e0040.0114 2.8800e0038.7000e0043.7600e00339.0515 39.0515 3.1000e0046.1400e00340.8894 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0585 0.0321 0.4490 1.1600e0030.1232 6.2000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.7000e0040.0333 117.5567 117.5567 3.3900e0033.1400e003118.5765 Total 0.0608 0.1198 0.4663 1.5300e0030.1337 1.5300e0030.1353 0.0356 1.4400e0030.0370 156.6081 156.6081 3.7000e0039.2800e003159.4659 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0591 0.0000 0.0591 8.9400e0030.0000 8.9400e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.0591 1.2427 1.3017 8.9400e0031.1553 1.1642 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.3000e0030.0876 0.0173 3.7000e0040.0105 9.1000e0040.0114 2.8800e0038.7000e0043.7600e00339.0515 39.0515 3.1000e0046.1400e00340.8894 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0585 0.0321 0.4490 1.1600e0030.1232 6.2000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.7000e0040.0333 117.5567 117.5567 3.3900e0033.1400e003118.5765 Total 0.0608 0.1198 0.4663 1.5300e0030.1337 1.5300e0030.1353 0.0356 1.4400e0030.0370 156.6081 156.6081 3.7000e0039.2800e003159.4659 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0701 0.0385 0.5388 1.3900e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 141.0680 141.0680 4.0600e0033.7700e003142.2918 Total 0.0701 0.0385 0.5388 1.3900e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 141.0680 141.0680 4.0600e0033.7700e003142.2918 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0701 0.0385 0.5388 1.3900e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 141.0680 141.0680 4.0600e0033.7700e003142.2918 Total 0.0701 0.0385 0.5388 1.3900e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 141.0680 141.0680 4.0600e0033.7700e003142.2918 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0779 0.0428 0.5986 1.5400e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 156.7422 156.7422 4.5200e0034.1800e003158.1020 Total 0.0779 0.0428 0.5986 1.5400e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 156.7422 156.7422 4.5200e0034.1800e003158.1020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 4.1416 1.6349 5.7765 1.6442 1.5041 3.1483 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0779 0.0428 0.5986 1.5400e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 156.7422 156.7422 4.5200e0034.1800e003158.1020 Total 0.0779 0.0428 0.5986 1.5400e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 156.7422 156.7422 4.5200e0034.1800e003158.1020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0168 0.4129 0.1203 1.6600e0030.0542 4.6400e0030.0589 0.0156 4.4400e0030.0201 176.0305 176.0305 1.3400e0030.0265 183.9643 Worker 0.1052 0.0578 0.8081 2.0800e0030.2218 1.1100e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0200e0030.0599 211.6020 211.6020 6.1000e0035.6500e003213.4377 Total 0.1220 0.4707 0.9285 3.7400e0030.2760 5.7500e0030.2818 0.0745 5.4600e0030.0799 387.6324 387.6324 7.4400e0030.0322 397.4019 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0168 0.4129 0.1203 1.6600e0030.0542 4.6400e0030.0589 0.0156 4.4400e0030.0201 176.0305 176.0305 1.3400e0030.0265 183.9643 Worker 0.1052 0.0578 0.8081 2.0800e0030.2218 1.1100e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0200e0030.0599 211.6020 211.6020 6.1000e0035.6500e003213.4377 Total 0.1220 0.4707 0.9285 3.7400e0030.2760 5.7500e0030.2818 0.0745 5.4600e0030.0799 387.6324 387.6324 7.4400e0030.0322 397.4019 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.9000e0030.3364 0.1038 1.6000e0030.0542 2.2500e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1500e0030.0178 169.4664 169.4664 9.3000e0040.0255 177.0874 Worker 0.0967 0.0506 0.7370 2.0100e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2228 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 206.0313 206.0313 5.4500e0035.1900e003207.7144 Total 0.1056 0.3870 0.8408 3.6100e0030.2760 3.3000e0030.2793 0.0745 3.1100e0030.0776 375.4978 375.4978 6.3800e0030.0307 384.8018 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.9000e0030.3364 0.1038 1.6000e0030.0542 2.2500e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1500e0030.0178 169.4664 169.4664 9.3000e0040.0255 177.0874 Worker 0.0967 0.0506 0.7370 2.0100e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2228 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 206.0313 206.0313 5.4500e0035.1900e003207.7144 Total 0.1056 0.3870 0.8408 3.6100e0030.2760 3.3000e0030.2793 0.0745 3.1100e0030.0776 375.4978 375.4978 6.3800e0030.0307 384.8018 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.6500e0030.3363 0.1013 1.5800e0030.0542 2.2700e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1700e0030.0178 166.5731 166.5731 8.8000e0040.0251 174.0639 Worker 0.0893 0.0447 0.6788 1.9500e0030.2218 9.9000e0040.2228 0.0588 9.1000e0040.0597 200.7833 200.7833 4.8800e0034.8000e003202.3363 Total 0.0979 0.3810 0.7802 3.5300e0030.2760 3.2600e0030.2793 0.0745 3.0800e0030.0775 367.3564 367.3564 5.7600e0030.0299 376.4002 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.6500e0030.3363 0.1013 1.5800e0030.0542 2.2700e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1700e0030.0178 166.5731 166.5731 8.8000e0040.0251 174.0639 Worker 0.0893 0.0447 0.6788 1.9500e0030.2218 9.9000e0040.2228 0.0588 9.1000e0040.0597 200.7833 200.7833 4.8800e0034.8000e003202.3363 Total 0.0979 0.3810 0.7802 3.5300e0030.2760 3.2600e0030.2793 0.0745 3.0800e0030.0775 367.3564 367.3564 5.7600e0030.0299 376.4002 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0496 0.0248 0.3771 1.0800e0030.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 111.5463 111.5463 2.7100e0032.6700e003112.4091 Total 0.0496 0.0248 0.3771 1.0800e0030.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 111.5463 111.5463 2.7100e0032.6700e003112.4091 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0496 0.0248 0.3771 1.0800e0030.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 111.5463 111.5463 2.7100e0032.6700e003112.4091 Total 0.0496 0.0248 0.3771 1.0800e0030.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 111.5463 111.5463 2.7100e0032.6700e003112.4091 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.7567 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 28.9374 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0165 8.2700e0030.1257 3.6000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 37.1821 37.1821 9.0000e0048.9000e00437.4697 Total 0.0165 8.2700e0030.1257 3.6000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 37.1821 37.1821 9.0000e0048.9000e00437.4697 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.7567 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 28.9374 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0165 8.2700e0030.1257 3.6000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 37.1821 37.1821 9.0000e0048.9000e00437.4697 Total 0.0165 8.2700e0030.1257 3.6000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 37.1821 37.1821 9.0000e0048.9000e00437.4697 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.4900 2.0522 15.2311 0.0414 4.2619 0.0281 4.2899 1.1334 0.0262 1.1596 4,342.909 6 4,342.909
6 0.2869 0.1916 4,407.179
7 Unmitigated 1.4946 2.0818 15.4772 0.0423 4.3489 0.0286 4.3774 1.1565 0.0266 1.1832 4,428.919 0 4,428.919
0 0.2913 0.1946 4,494.190
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641 Total 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 48.40 15.90 35.70 86 11 3 Improve Pedestrian Network
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.527700 0.209000 0.167500 0.055600 0.000900 0.000900 0.008000 0.021400 0.000000 0.004300 0.002500 0.000200 0.002000
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
4873.37 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Total 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
4.87337 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Total 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Unmitigated 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2758 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.4422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0790 0.6751 0.2873 4.3100e0030.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0000 861.8824 861.8824 0.0165 0.0158 867.0041 Landscaping 0.1835 0.0703 6.1025 3.2000e0040.0338 0.0338 0.0338 0.0338 10.9929 10.9929 0.0106 11.2566 Total 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2758 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.4422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0790 0.6751 0.2873 4.3100e0030.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0000 861.8824 861.8824 0.0165 0.0158 867.0041 Landscaping 0.1835 0.0703 6.1025 3.2000e0040.0338 0.0338 0.0338 0.0338 10.9929 10.9929 0.0106 11.2566 Total 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:43 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied TSM 21-0015
Fresno County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Gross acreage used. Square footage based on lot size multiplied by minimum FAR of 0.2. Population based on Housing Element persons per household.
Grading - Assumes site is balanced.
Demolition - Assumes 4,000 square feet of buildings to be demolished.
Architectural Coating - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601 applies.
Fleet Mix - Assumes 2024 SJVAPCD Residential Fleet Mix
Woodstoves - No woodstoves per Rule 4901
Area Coating - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project submit to a Dust Control Plan.
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 74.00 Dwelling Unit 29.04 160,851.00 237
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Area Mitigation - Assumes Year 2022 SJVAPCD Rule 4601
2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 150.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 150 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 150 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix LDA 0.52 0.53
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.05 0.21
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 9.0000e-004
tblFleetMix LHD2 6.8290e-003 9.0000e-004
tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 2.5000e-003
tblFleetMix MDV 0.16 0.06
tblFleetMix MH 2.9750e-003 2.0000e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 8.0000e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 7.0700e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 1.4960e-003 2.0000e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.8900e-004 4.3000e-003
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 133,200.00 160,851.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 24.03 29.04
tblLandUse Population 212.00 237.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 3.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 3.70 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6937 38.8937 29.5508 0.0635 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,150.481 1 6,150.481
1 1.9493 0.0329 6,200.600
2 2023 1.6668 14.8041 16.9818 0.0303 0.2760 0.7030 0.9791 0.0745 0.6616 0.7360 0.0000 2,907.876 6 2,907.876
6 0.6149 0.0313 2,932.587
8 2024 28.9521 13.8559 16.8552 0.0303 0.2760 0.6166 0.8926 0.0745 0.5800 0.6544 0.0000 2,900.874 1 2,900.874
1 0.7170 0.0305 2,925.222
1 Maximum 28.9521 38.8937 29.5508 0.0635 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,150.481 1 6,150.481
1 1.9493 0.0329 6,200.600
2 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6937 38.8937 29.5508 0.0635 8.9935 1.6357 10.6068 4.5853 1.5049 6.0696 0.0000 6,150.481 1 6,150.481
1 1.9493 0.0329 6,200.600
2 2023 1.6668 14.8041 16.9818 0.0303 0.2760 0.7030 0.9791 0.0745 0.6616 0.7360 0.0000 2,907.876 6 2,907.876
6 0.6149 0.0313 2,932.587
8 2024 28.9521 13.8559 16.8552 0.0303 0.2760 0.6166 0.8926 0.0745 0.5800 0.6544 0.0000 2,900.874 1 2,900.874
1 0.7170 0.0305 2,925.222
1 Maximum 28.9521 38.8937 29.5508 0.0635 8.9935 1.6357 10.6068 4.5853 1.5049 6.0696 0.0000 6,150.481 1 6,150.481
1 1.9493 0.0329 6,200.600
2 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.11 0.00 46.42 53.99 0.00 42.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Energy 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mobile 1.0758 2.3267 14.1798 0.0382 4.3489 0.0286 4.3774 1.1565 0.0267 1.1832 4,013.244 3 4,013.244
3 0.3109 0.2063 4,082.499
3 Total 5.1088 3.5213 20.7607 0.0457 4.3489 0.1533 4.5022 1.1565 0.1514 1.3079 0.0000 5,459.456 7 5,459.456
7 0.3490 0.2326 5,537.504
2 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Energy 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mobile 1.0717 2.2938 13.9866 0.0375 4.2619 0.0281 4.2899 1.1334 0.0262 1.1596 3,935.624 8 3,935.624
8 0.3067 0.2032 4,003.841
1 Total 5.1047 3.4884 20.5675 0.0450 4.2619 0.1528 4.4147 1.1334 0.1509 1.2843 0.0000 5,381.837 2 5,381.837
2 0.3448 0.2295 5,458.846
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2022 2/11/2022 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/12/2022 3/11/2022 5 20 3 Grading Grading 3/12/2022 5/13/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 5/14/2022 1/19/2024 5 440 5 Paving Paving 1/20/2024 3/8/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/9/2024 4/26/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.08 0.93 0.93 1.62 2.00 0.34 1.94 2.00 0.32 1.81 0.00 1.42 1.42 1.21 1.35 1.42 Residential Indoor: 325,723; Residential Outdoor: 108,574; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 30
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 135
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 18.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 27.00 8.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1313 0.0000 0.1313 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.1313 1.2427 1.3739 0.0199 1.1553 1.1751 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.2200e0030.0937 0.0177 3.7000e0040.0105 9.2000e0040.0114 2.8800e0038.8000e0043.7600e00339.0772 39.0772 3.0000e0046.1500e00340.9163 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0377 0.3820 1.0300e0030.1232 6.2000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.7000e0040.0333 104.3029 104.3029 3.7900e0033.4900e003105.4383 Total 0.0539 0.1314 0.3997 1.4000e0030.1337 1.5400e0030.1353 0.0356 1.4500e0030.0370 143.3801 143.3801 4.0900e0039.6400e003146.3546 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0591 0.0000 0.0591 8.9400e0030.0000 8.9400e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.0591 1.2427 1.3017 8.9400e0031.1553 1.1642 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.2200e0030.0937 0.0177 3.7000e0040.0105 9.2000e0040.0114 2.8800e0038.8000e0043.7600e00339.0772 39.0772 3.0000e0046.1500e00340.9163 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0377 0.3820 1.0300e0030.1232 6.2000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.7000e0040.0333 104.3029 104.3029 3.7900e0033.4900e003105.4383 Total 0.0539 0.1314 0.3997 1.4000e0030.1337 1.5400e0030.1353 0.0356 1.4500e0030.0370 143.3801 143.3801 4.0900e0039.6400e003146.3546 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0620 0.0452 0.4584 1.2300e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 125.1635 125.1635 4.5400e0034.1900e003126.5259 Total 0.0620 0.0452 0.4584 1.2300e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 125.1635 125.1635 4.5400e0034.1900e003126.5259 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0620 0.0452 0.4584 1.2300e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 125.1635 125.1635 4.5400e0034.1900e003126.5259 Total 0.0620 0.0452 0.4584 1.2300e0030.1479 7.4000e0040.1486 0.0392 6.8000e0040.0399 125.1635 125.1635 4.5400e0034.1900e003126.5259 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0688 0.0503 0.5093 1.3700e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 139.0705 139.0705 5.0500e0034.6600e003140.5844 Total 0.0688 0.0503 0.5093 1.3700e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 139.0705 139.0705 5.0500e0034.6600e003140.5844 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 4.1416 1.6349 5.7765 1.6442 1.5041 3.1483 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0688 0.0503 0.5093 1.3700e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 139.0705 139.0705 5.0500e0034.6600e003140.5844 Total 0.0688 0.0503 0.5093 1.3700e0030.1643 8.2000e0040.1651 0.0436 7.6000e0040.0443 139.0705 139.0705 5.0500e0034.6600e003140.5844 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0163 0.4405 0.1246 1.6700e0030.0542 4.6500e0030.0589 0.0156 4.4500e0030.0201 176.1861 176.1861 1.3200e0030.0266 184.1333 Worker 0.0929 0.0679 0.6875 1.8500e0030.2218 1.1100e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0200e0030.0599 187.7452 187.7452 6.8200e0036.2900e003189.7889 Total 0.1092 0.5083 0.8121 3.5200e0030.2760 5.7600e0030.2818 0.0745 5.4700e0030.0799 363.9314 363.9314 8.1400e0030.0329 373.9222 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0163 0.4405 0.1246 1.6700e0030.0542 4.6500e0030.0589 0.0156 4.4500e0030.0201 176.1861 176.1861 1.3200e0030.0266 184.1333 Worker 0.0929 0.0679 0.6875 1.8500e0030.2218 1.1100e0030.2229 0.0588 1.0200e0030.0599 187.7452 187.7452 6.8200e0036.2900e003189.7889 Total 0.1092 0.5083 0.8121 3.5200e0030.2760 5.7600e0030.2818 0.0745 5.4700e0030.0799 363.9314 363.9314 8.1400e0030.0329 373.9222 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3400e0030.3599 0.1073 1.6100e0030.0542 2.2600e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1600e0030.0178 169.7911 169.7911 9.0000e0040.0256 177.4325 Worker 0.0857 0.0594 0.6305 1.7900e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2228 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 182.8756 182.8756 6.1300e0035.7700e003184.7493 Total 0.0941 0.4192 0.7378 3.4000e0030.2760 3.3100e0030.2793 0.0745 3.1200e0030.0776 352.6667 352.6667 7.0300e0030.0313 362.1818 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3400e0030.3599 0.1073 1.6100e0030.0542 2.2600e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1600e0030.0178 169.7911 169.7911 9.0000e0040.0256 177.4325 Worker 0.0857 0.0594 0.6305 1.7900e0030.2218 1.0500e0030.2228 0.0588 9.6000e0040.0598 182.8756 182.8756 6.1300e0035.7700e003184.7493 Total 0.0941 0.4192 0.7378 3.4000e0030.2760 3.3100e0030.2793 0.0745 3.1200e0030.0776 352.6667 352.6667 7.0300e0030.0313 362.1818 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.1000e0030.3598 0.1048 1.5800e0030.0542 2.2700e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1800e0030.0178 166.8946 166.8946 8.5000e0040.0251 174.4051 Worker 0.0794 0.0524 0.5836 1.7300e0030.2218 9.9000e0040.2228 0.0588 9.1000e0040.0597 178.2806 178.2806 5.5200e0035.3400e003180.0094 Total 0.0875 0.4121 0.6884 3.3100e0030.2760 3.2600e0030.2793 0.0745 3.0900e0030.0775 345.1752 345.1752 6.3700e0030.0305 354.4145 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.1000e0030.3598 0.1048 1.5800e0030.0542 2.2700e0030.0565 0.0156 2.1800e0030.0178 166.8946 166.8946 8.5000e0040.0251 174.4051 Worker 0.0794 0.0524 0.5836 1.7300e0030.2218 9.9000e0040.2228 0.0588 9.1000e0040.0597 178.2806 178.2806 5.5200e0035.3400e003180.0094 Total 0.0875 0.4121 0.6884 3.3100e0030.2760 3.2600e0030.2793 0.0745 3.0900e0030.0775 345.1752 345.1752 6.3700e0030.0305 354.4145 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0441 0.0291 0.3242 9.6000e0040.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 99.0448 99.0448 3.0700e0032.9700e003100.0052 Total 0.0441 0.0291 0.3242 9.6000e0040.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 99.0448 99.0448 3.0700e0032.9700e003100.0052 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0441 0.0291 0.3242 9.6000e0040.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 99.0448 99.0448 3.0700e0032.9700e003100.0052 Total 0.0441 0.0291 0.3242 9.6000e0040.1232 5.5000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.1000e0040.0332 99.0448 99.0448 3.0700e0032.9700e003100.0052 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.7567 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 28.9374 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0147 9.6900e0030.1081 3.2000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 33.0149 33.0149 1.0200e0039.9000e00433.3351 Total 0.0147 9.6900e0030.1081 3.2000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 33.0149 33.0149 1.0200e0039.9000e00433.3351 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.7567 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 28.9374 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0147 9.6900e0030.1081 3.2000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 33.0149 33.0149 1.0200e0039.9000e00433.3351 Total 0.0147 9.6900e0030.1081 3.2000e0040.0411 1.8000e0040.0413 0.0109 1.7000e0040.0111 33.0149 33.0149 1.0200e0039.9000e00433.3351 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.0717 2.2938 13.9866 0.0375 4.2619 0.0281 4.2899 1.1334 0.0262 1.1596 3,935.624 8 3,935.624
8 0.3067 0.2032 4,003.841
1 Unmitigated 1.0758 2.3267 14.1798 0.0382 4.3489 0.0286 4.3774 1.1565 0.0267 1.1832 4,013.244 3 4,013.244
3 0.3109 0.2063 4,082.499
3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641 Total 698.56 705.96 632.70 2,022,083 1,981,641
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 48.40 15.90 35.70 86 11 3 Improve Pedestrian Network
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.527700 0.209000 0.167500 0.055600 0.000900 0.000900 0.008000 0.021400 0.000000 0.004300 0.002500 0.000200 0.002000
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
4873.37 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Total 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Single Family
Housing
4.87337 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Total 0.0526 0.4491 0.1911 2.8700e0030.0363 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363 573.3372 573.3372 0.0110 0.0105 576.7443 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Unmitigated 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2758 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.4422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0790 0.6751 0.2873 4.3100e0030.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0000 861.8824 861.8824 0.0165 0.0158 867.0041 Landscaping 0.1835 0.0703 6.1025 3.2000e0040.0338 0.0338 0.0338 0.0338 10.9929 10.9929 0.0106 11.2566 Total 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2758 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.4422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0790 0.6751 0.2873 4.3100e0030.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0546 0.0000 861.8824 861.8824 0.0165 0.0158 867.0041 Landscaping 0.1835 0.0703 6.1025 3.2000e0040.0338 0.0338 0.0338 0.0338 10.9929 10.9929 0.0106 11.2566 Total 3.9805 0.7455 6.3898 4.6300e0030.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 0.0000 872.8752 872.8752 0.0271 0.0158 878.2607 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 10/13/2021 11:44 AM TSM 21-0015 - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • October 2021 Appendix B-1 Appendix B
Biological Resources Information
City of Fowler
Tentative Subdivision
Map No. 21-0015 Project
Biological Resources Information
California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Report – Nine Quad Element Search • A thorough search of the CNDDB for published accounts of special status plant and animal species was conducted for the Porterville 7.5-minute quadrangles that contains the Project site in its entirety, and for the eight surrounding quadrangles: Frazier Valley, Lindsay, Cairns Corner, Success Dam, Sausalito School, Ducor, Woodville, and Fountain Springs.
• Report ran on September 3, 2021.
o 20 special status animal species have been documented in the Area of Potential Effect (APE).
o With mitigation measures outlined in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4, potential impacts nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant. o 12 special status plant species have been documented in the Project. ▪ Mitigation is not warranted for special status plants due to ongoing disturbance and/or absence of suitable habitat.
IPaC System - Explore Locations Resources
• Report ran on September 10, 2021.
• There are no critical habitats in the Project APE.
California Natural Diversity Database Report – 9 Quad
Element Search
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
alkali-sink goldfields
Lasthenia chrysantha
PDAST5L030 None None G2 S2 1B.1
American badger
Taxidea taxus
AMAJF04010 None None G5 S3 SSC
Antioch efferian robberfly
Efferia antiochi
IIDIP07010 None None G1G2 S1S2
black-crowned night heron
Nycticorax nycticorax
ABNGA11010 None None G5 S4
bristly sedge
Carex comosa
PMCYP032Y0 None None G5 S2 2B.1
burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
ABNSB10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
California glossy snake
Arizona elegans occidentalis
ARADB01017 None None G5T2 S2 SSC
California jewelflower
Caulanthus californicus
PDBRA31010 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
California linderiella
Linderiella occidentalis
ICBRA06010 None None G2G3 S2S3
California satintail
Imperata brevifolia
PMPOA3D020 None None G4 S3 2B.1
California tiger salamander - central California DPS
Ambystoma californiense pop. 1
AAAAA01181 Threatened Threatened G2G3 S3 WL
coast horned lizard
Phrynosoma blainvillii
ARACF12100 None None G3G4 S3S4 SSC
Crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
IIHYM24480 None Candidate
Endangered
G3G4 S1S2
double-crested cormorant
Phalacrocorax auritus
ABNFD01020 None None G5 S4 WL
forked hare-leaf
Lagophylla dichotoma
PDAST5J070 None None G2 S2 1B.1
Fresno kangaroo rat
Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
AMAFD03151 Endangered Endangered G3TH SH
great egret
Ardea alba
ABNGA04040 None None G5 S4
Greene's tuctoria
Tuctoria greenei
PMPOA6N010 Endangered Rare G1 S1 1B.1
hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
AMACC05030 None None G3G4 S4
Query Criteria: Quad<span style='color:Red'> IS </span>(Malaga (3611966)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Sanger (3611965)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Selma (3611955)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Conejo (3611956)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Caruthers (3611957)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Fresno South (3611967)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Fresno North (3611977)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Clovis (3611976)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Round Mountain (3611975)) Report Printed on Friday, September 10, 2021
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 3 2021 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 3 Information Expires 3/3/2022
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Hurd's metapogon robberfly
Metapogon hurdi
IIDIP08010 None None G1G2 S1S2
least Bell's vireo
Vireo bellii pusillus
ABPBW01114 Endangered Endangered G5T2 S2
Madera leptosiphon
Leptosiphon serrulatus
PDPLM09130 None None G3 S3 1B.2
midvalley fairy shrimp
Branchinecta mesovallensis
ICBRA03150 None None G2 S2S3
molestan blister beetle
Lytta molesta
IICOL4C030 None None G2 S2
Northern California legless lizard
Anniella pulchra
ARACC01020 None None G3 S3 SSC
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
CTT44120CA None None G1 S1.1
Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool
Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool
CTT44110CA None None G3 S3.1
pallid bat
Antrozous pallidus
AMACC10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
San Joaquin adobe sunburst
Pseudobahia peirsonii
PDAST7P030 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
San Joaquin kit fox
Vulpes macrotis mutica
AMAJA03041 Endangered Threatened G4T2 S2
San Joaquin pocket mouse
Perognathus inornatus
AMAFD01060 None None G2G3 S2S3
San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass
Orcuttia inaequalis
PMPOA4G060 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Sanford's arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii
PMALI040Q0 None None G3 S3 1B.2
snowy egret
Egretta thula
ABNGA06030 None None G5 S4
spiny-sepaled button-celery
Eryngium spinosepalum
PDAPI0Z0Y0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
succulent owl's-clover
Castilleja campestris var. succulenta
PDSCR0D3Z1 Threatened Endangered G4?T2T3 S2S3 1B.2
Swainson's hawk
Buteo swainsoni
ABNKC19070 None Threatened G5 S3
tricolored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
ABPBXB0020 None Threatened G1G2 S1S2 SSC
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
IICOL48011 Threatened None G3T2 S3
vernal pool fairy shrimp
Branchinecta lynchi
ICBRA03030 Threatened None G3 S3
Report Printed on Friday, September 10, 2021
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 3 2021 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 3 Information Expires 3/3/2022
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
western mastiff bat
Eumops perotis californicus
AMACD02011 None None G4G5T4 S3S4 SSC
western pond turtle
Emys marmorata
ARAAD02030 None None G3G4 S3 SSC
western spadefoot
Spea hammondii
AAABF02020 None None G2G3 S3 SSC
western yellow-billed cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus occidentalis
ABNRB02022 Threatened Endangered G5T2T3 S1
Record Count: 44
Report Printed on Friday, September 10, 2021
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 3 2021 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 of 3 Information Expires 3/3/2022
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
IPaC System - Explore Locations Resources
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 1/9 IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Project information
NAME
City of Fowler Marshall Estates
LOCATION
Fresno County, California
DESCRIPTION
None
Local office
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
(916) 414-6600
(916) 414-6713
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 2/9 Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 3/9 Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Log in to IPaC.
2. Go to your My Projects list.
3. Click PROJECT HOME for this project.
4. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
1 2
NAME STATUS
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 4/9 Birds
Reptiles
Amphibians
Fresno Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5150
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Gambelia silus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/625
Endangered
Giant Garter Snake Thamnophis gigas
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4482
Threatened
NAME STATUS
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 5/9 Fishes
Insects
Crustaceans
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
NAME STATUS
Delta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/321
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
NAME STATUS
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
1 2
9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 6/9 THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf 9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 7/9 guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize 9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 8/9 potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. 9/10/21, 10:25 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/KFJJ3T2DKNFAVMOGQHSTSMMDGY/resources 9/9 Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • October 2021 Appendix C-1 Appendix C
Cultural Resources Information
City of Fowler
Tentative Subdivision
Map No. 21-0015 Project
Cultural Resources Information
Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, CSU Bakersfield, California Historical Resources Information System: Record Search 21-254, dated July 6, 2021. • There have been no previous cultural resource studies conducted within the project area.
• There has been one cultural resource study conducted within a one-quarter mile radius, FR-00288.
• There are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is not known if any exist. • There are two recorded cultural resources within the one-quarter mile radius, P-10- 002864 and P-10-004423. These resources are an historic era trash scatter and an historic era park, respectively.
• There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.
AB 52 Consultation pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.3.1 • The City of Fowler has received a letter from the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe.
• A Tribal Consultation Notification Request Letter was sent out by the City of Fowler via certified mail dated June 8, 2021, which included a Project Description, map of the APE and a Topo map.
• No correspondence has been received by the City of Fowler pursuant to the Tribal Consultation Notification Request Letter.
CHRIS – Record Search Results
To: Jacqueline Lancaster Record Search 21-254
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
130 N. Garden Street
Visalia, CA 93291
Date: July 6, 2021
Re: City of Fowler, Tentative Subdivision Map 21-0015
County: Fresno
Map(s): Malaga 7.5’
CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.
The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.
PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies conducted within the project area. There has been one study conducted within a one-half mile radius, FR00288.
Record Search 21-254
KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is not known if any exist there. There are two recorded resources within the one-half mile radius, P-10-002864 and P-10-004423. These resources are an historic era trash scatter and an historic era park, respectively.
There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project consists of a subdivision of approximately 29 acres to allow for the creation of 103 single-family residential lots. Further, we understand two residences that currently exist in the project area, one of which was built in 1925, will be demolished as part of the project activities. Because no cultural resource studies have taken place on this project area, it is unknown if any cultural resources are present.
Therefore, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey to determine if cultural resources are present. Further, according to our records, the existing structures have never been recorded or evaluated for historical significance. We recommend a qualified, professional consultant record and evaluated the structure prior to demolition. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.
We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.
By:
Celeste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: July 6, 2021
Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.
AB 52 Tribal Consultation
__________________________________________________________________________________ City of Fowler 128 S. Fifth Street, Fowler, CA 93625 (559) 834-3110 June 18, 2021
Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria Leo Sisco, Chairman
C/O Cultural Department
P.O. Box 8
Lemoore, CA 93245
Subject: Consultation pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 for Tentative Subdivision Map No. 21-0015, located on the east side of South Armstrong Avenue between East Hogan and East Adams Avenues in the City of Fowler, Fresno County, CA Dear Chairman Sisco:
The City of Fowler is the Lead Agency for the project described above. The City is requesting your review to determine if formal consultation is appropriate pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, et seq. (Assembly Bill 52). The project proposes the following activities at Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel No. 340-130-14:
Subdivision of a 29.04-gross acre parcel for the purposes of creating a 103-lot singlefamily residential subdivision. An approximately 2.09-acre ponding basin and 1.54-acre park would be constructed within the subdivision.
We understand that pursuant to Public Resources Code Subdivision 21080.3.1(d) the Tribe has 30 days from receipt of this letter to request formal consultation. Please call Jarred Olsen at (559) 636-1166 Ext 535 or email at [email protected] with any questions.
Respectfully,
Dawn Marple
City Planner Enclosures: Quad Map
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • October 2021 Appendix D-1 Appendix D
Soils Report
Natural Resource Conservation Services - Custom Soil
Resource Report
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California
Marshall Estates II
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 28, 2021
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 Ex—Exeter loam......................................................................................... 13 Hc—Hanford sandy loam............................................................................14 Hst—Hesperia fine sandy loam, deep.........................................................15 References............................................................................................................17 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7 Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4057930 4057990 4058050 4058110 4058170 4058230 4058290 4057930 4057990 4058050 4058110 4058170 4058230
260930 260990 261050 261110 261170 261230 261290 261350 261410 261470 260930 260990 261050 261110 261170 261230 261290 261350 261410 261470 36° 38' 24'' N
119° 40' 26'' W
36° 38' 24'' N
119° 40' 4'' W
36° 38' 12'' N
119° 40' 26'' W
36° 38' 12'' N N 119° 40' 4'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 35 70 140 210
Meters
Map Scale: 1:2,590 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 13, May 29, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 21, 2021—Feb 1, 2021
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10 Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Ex Exeter loam 2.3 7.6%
Hc Hanford sandy loam 1.3 4.1%
Hst Hesperia fine sandy loam, deep 27.2 88.3%
Totals for Area of Interest 30.8 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report
11 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12 Eastern Fresno Area, California
Ex—Exeter loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl3w
Elevation: 200 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 14 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Exeter and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Exeter
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 15 inches: loam
Bt - 15 to 30 inches: loam
Bqm - 30 to 40 inches: cemented
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to duripan Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 14 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13 Unnamed, ponded
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Hc—Hanford sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl5f
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans, flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, rise Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 16 inches: sandy loam
C - 16 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Custom Soil Resource Report
14 Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, channeled
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Channels on alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Hst—Hesperia fine sandy loam, deep
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2yc9g
Elevation: 230 to 310 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 314 to 327 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hesperia, deep, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Hesperia, Deep
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Coarse-loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 5 inches: fine sandy loam
Ap2 - 5 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 32 inches: fine sandy loam
Btk - 32 to 43 inches: fine sandy loam
2Bdk - 43 to 63 inches: stratified silt loam
2Cd - 63 to 79 inches: stratified silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 43 inches to densic material Drainage class: Well drained
Custom Soil Resource Report
15 Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to
0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 2.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed, reclaimed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Fan skirts
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, loam surface
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
16 References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 17 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
18 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO REFLECT A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO. 340-130-14 FROM R-1-10 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL – 10,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT SIZE), TO R-1-7 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL – 7,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT SIZE) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Fowler is hereby amended to indicate Assessor’s Parcel No. 340-130-14 as R-1-7 (One Family Residential – 7,000 square foot minimum lot size) as indicated in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is further directed to cause this ordinance or a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Fowler, within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on ____________________, 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council held on ____________________, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Daniel T. Parra, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Angela Vasquez, Deputy City Clerk
2 Exhibit “A”
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2631
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER APPROVING THE REVISIONS TO TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6381 TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FROM 74 TO 94
WHEREAS, in January of 2022, Tentative Tract Map No. 21-0015 (also known as “Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6381”) was previously submitted for approval to subdivide 29.04 acres (APN 340-130-14) located north of the northwest corner of East Adams and North Armstrong Avenues (“Property”) into 74 single-family lots, and was approved by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2022 the applicant submitted an application requesting to revise Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6381 to increase the number of single-family lots from 74 to 94, with the intent of constructing 94 single-family homes on the Property (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the subject application was reviewed for compliance with the Fowler Municipal Code and General Plan; and
WHEREAS, City staff recommend the City Council approve the revision to Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6381 as shown in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and subject to the Conditions of Approval also attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and discussed the Project and conducted a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on March 21, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration on the basis that the proposed Project will not have any significant adverse effects on the environment with the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with requirements under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the proposed revisions to Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6381, as well as the staff report, Addendum, the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all evidence presented at the public hearing, including oral and written public testimony on the Project, and those records and documents related to the Project determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, which are incorporated herein by this reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler, based upon the entire record of proceedings, hereby finds:
1. The proposed revisions to the map are consistent with the City’s applicable general and specific plans.
2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s applicable general and specific plans.
2 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5. The design of the subdivision, or the proposed improvements, are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements, are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. The design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, the property within the proposed subdivision.
8. These findings could not be made without the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit “B”.
9. The revision to Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6381 as shown on Exhibit “A” is approved, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit “B”.
The foregoing resolution of the City Council of the City of Fowler was duly and regularly introduced and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 21, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
___________________________
Daniel T. Parra, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Angela Vasquez, Deputy City Clerk
15 5 7 9 11 13 3
1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
66 64
65 63
59 57
60 58
67 71 70
68 69
76 77 78 79
72 73
74 75
61 62
49 51
53 55
48 50
52 37 54
39 41
43 36
38 40
42 44 45 46 47
17 16
23 18 19 20 21 22
24 30 31 32 33 34
29 28 27 26 25
35 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 94
93 80 81 82 83 84
56 TRACT NO. 6381
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SURVEYED AND PLATTED IN NOVEMBER 2022
CONSISTING OF TWO SHEETS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
LEGEND
MARSHALL ESTATES II
N
CIVIL ENGINEERS I LAND SURVEYORS
P. 559-320-0344 I F. 559-320-0345 I WWW.GATEWAYENG.COM
405 PARK CREEK DRIVE, CLOVIS, CA 93611-4435 NORTH ARMSTRONG AVENUE EAST BOORNAZIAN AVE.
EAST HEIDI AVE. EAST HEIDI AVE.
AHRONIAN AVE. AHRONIAN AVE. NORTH LAKER LANE NORTH VISTA STREET NORTH CHRISTOPHER STREET NORTH LAKER LANE OUTLOT "B"
PROPOSED
PARK
OUTLOT "A"
PROPOSED
BASIN
EXISTING
PONDING BASIN
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR PARCEL
AREA TABLES
1 Exhibit B – Conditions of Approval
General
1. All conditions of the applicant shall be conditions of approval, except as further modified below, and subject to modifications to conform to applicable City Standards.
2. The design and improvement of the subdivision shall conform to Titles 1 through 15 of the City of Fowler Subdivision Ordinance and to the City of Fowler Standard Specifications ("Standard Specifications"), unless otherwise specified in these conditions.
3. The applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City if the final map is recorded prior to completion of the off-site improvements.
4. The applicant pays all fees as required by existing ordinances and schedules.
5. All water wells and septic systems that served the property shall be abandoned pursuant to City, County, and State standards.
6. The applicant shall relinquish all rights and privileges associated with all previously approved tentative tract maps on the subject properties.
7. Applicant shall consent to and facilitate annexation of the subject project into the City’s Landscape and Storm Drainage Maintenance District or a Community Facilities District.
8. As many energy-conserving features as possible shall be included in the project. Examples include, but are not limited to, increased wall and ceiling insulation, natural gas fireplaces, electrical and natural gas outlets installed around the exterior of the units to encourage use of electric yard maintenance equipment and gas-fired barbeques, and each home wired for computers/internet and electronic meter reading.
9. To reduce construction noise, construction contracts shall require that all equipment be maintained according to the manufacturers’ specifications, and that noise-generating equipment be equipped with mufflers.
10. Hours of construction shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday.
11. The developer shall provide concrete pads and walkway within the side yards adjacent to garages for the placement of trash/recycling containers behind the rear yard fences/gates. All trash/recycling containers shall be placed out of public view except on the days of collection.
The developer shall disclose this requirement to the future homeowners within the subdivision.
12. Crosswalks shall be provided within the proposed streets to ensure pedestrian safety in areas determined by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community Development Director and these crosswalks shall be decorative such thermoplastic pavement striping and/or stamped and colored concrete.
13. Projects shall include all street lights, street signs, stop signs, and other designated by the City for street call names and traffic control. All signs shall be provided per City Municipal Code and shall be in like kind constructed on adjacent streets.
14. The developer shall obtain Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review) approval from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) prior to commencement of construction activities.
15. The developer shall obtain Dust Control Plan approval from SJVAPCD prior to commencement of grading activities.
16. Construction of the Project shall comply with the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
2 Design Review
17. Development of the tentative subdivision map shall be in accordance with Fowler Municipal Code Section 9-5.1605, Single-Family Residential Subdivision Design Criteria.
18. The developer shall work with the Fowler Unified School District to provide adequate transportation routes such as a local pedestrian or bike paths, or local bus service, within or along the Armstrong frontage.
19. Cul-de-sac nearest South Armstrong Avenue shall be open-ended as feasible for pedestrian access.
20. The developer shall submit a site plan that demonstrates compliance with the Single-Family Residential Subdivision Design Criteria. The site plan shall provide elevations, floor plans, building envelopes for varied setbacks, landscaping, and other information necessary to demonstrate compliance with these criteria, the Site Plan Review Ordinance, and other applicable City codes. The site plan shall be approved before issuance of the first building permit.
To the extent the tentative or final map demonstrates compliance with these criteria, the site plan may reference the maps.
21. The developer shall provide front yard landscaping prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Final Map:
22. A right to farm covenant shall be recorded prior to recordation of the final map.
23. The minimum frontage of each lot shall comply with the City of Fowler Zoning Ordinance.
24. The lots adjacent to Armstrong Avenue shall have no direct vehicular access to said streets.
25. Street right of way and pedestrian/utility easements shall be dedicated to the City of Fowler as indicated on the tentative map.
26. Street names shall be verified by City staff prior to finalizing the final map. Street names shall be consistent with streets along similar alignments throughout the City and with policies in effect at time of Final Map.
Circulation:
27. Developer shall construct frontage improvements along Armstrong Avenue including curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, LED street lighting and landscaping. A pavement overlay may be required beyond the centerline to provide for a smooth transition. Transition grade greater than 4 percent will not be allowed. The street section shall be striped for two-way traffic and approved by the City of Fowler.
28. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated such that an 80-foot right of way is provided along Armstrong Avenue.
29. Local street pavement section shall be a minimum or 2.5 inches of hot mix asphalt over 5 inches of Class II aggregate and verified by a project soils report.
30. Traffic and street signs shall be installed by the Owner/Developer per City requirements.
31. Developer shall construct a pedestrian path through the proposed storm drain basin property connecting Tracts 5090 and 6381. Path shall be minimum 8-foot wide and shall include hard surfacing, landscaping, accessible ramps at street terminations, landscaping, and lighting.
Developer shall dedicate right-of-way or easements as necessary to facilitate the path. 3 Water:
32. A looped water system be developed within the subdivision and be tested and accepted by the City of Fowler Public Works Department. Each parcel shall be equipped a water meter/box approved by the Public Works Director.
33. All interior water mains shall be an 8-inch water main and loop within each phase of development. The completed interior water system shall be connected to the 12-inch water mains in the major collector street.
34. Fire hydrants shall be installed at 300-foot intervals at the locations specified by the Fire Chief and City Engineer.
35. Two water sample stations shall be installed within the subdivision at the locations specified by the Public Works Director.
Sewer:
36. The developer shall comply with the conditions set forth by Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler Sanitation District and pay all associated fees.
Grading and Drainage:
37. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit for all on-site grading work.
38. The developer’s engineer shall provide drainage calculations for the subdivision. A temporary basin located north of the tract is proposed. The proposed drainage basin area shall be capable of retaining drainage associated with Tract 6188 and Tract 6381 during a 100-year storm event and shall be graded to become contiguous with the basin constructed with Tract 5090.
Additionally, perimeter chain link fencing between the two properties shall be modified to accommodate and surround the ultimate basin configuration. Basin fencing abutting lots shall include privacy slats (tan color). A 20-foot wide storm drain easement shall be located adjacent to and immediately south of Lot 18 and dedicated to the City as a storm drain easement.
39. Piping shall be installed within the subdivision to facilitate abandonment of the drainage basin in the Ahronian tract such that the drainage from this basin can be directed through the tract to the larger regional basin in Tract 5090.
40. Developer shall abandon and backfill the temporary basin constructed with Tract 6188 subject to recommendations of a geotechnical report.
41. The developer’s engineer shall submit a storm drain plan and hydraulic calculations showing location of inlets, manholes, and pipelines (including sizing) to City Engineer for review and approval prior to preparation of improvement plans.
42. The developer shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The plan shall provide for the mitigation of soil erosion from the project site during the construction and warranty periods and be submitted to the City prior to the start of construction. Developer shall supply City with the approved SWPPP and WDID number.
43. As a part of the mitigation measures for soil erosion, the developer shall be responsible for street sweeping during the one-year warranty period.
Aesthetics:
44. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer for the areas along the frontage of South Armstrong Avenue.
45. A 6-foot-high decorative block wall shall be constructed between residential lots and the 4 proposed park area. Block walls shall be treated with an approved anti-graffiti coating and/or screened with vines as approved by the City Engineer.
46. Developer shall coordinate with existing property owners where new lots abut existing residences to repair or replace fences between the two properties. Each lot shall have a street tree planted along its frontage.
47. Dedicate and construct a minimum of 0.00646 acres per single-family detached residential lot.
Proposed improvements shall include benches, play structure with shade, concrete flatwork and landscaping as approved by the City Engineer.
48. In accordance with General Plan Policy 4.3-16 and Fowler Municipal Code Section 9-5.1605- K, a minimum of 5% (57,935 square feet) of the project site shall be developed with usable open space which could include common recreation areas, mini-parks, common green belts/recreation trails, and landscaping. Such open space shall be maintained by assessment district, landscape/lighting district, homeowners' association, or other appropriate maintenance entity. Open space proposed to be developed and dedicated as a park shall count toward the subdivision’s Quimby Act obligation above.
Utilities:
49. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to the subdivision shall be undergrounded such that not overhead poles remain between the north boundary of Tract 5090 and the south boundary of Tract 6188.
50. The developer shall provide a street light plan for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction. Streetlights shall be provided by the developer and maintained by the City pursuant to PG&E rate schedule LS2C.
51. Developer shall work with PG&E for the preparation of a utility plan, subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction. All work shall be completed such that no street surface need be reopened for service.
Irrigation:
52. Any irrigation pipelines maintained by CID shall be relocated outside of the street right of way, except at street crossings. Any irrigation lines that must remain in service shall be reconstructed with rubber gasket reinforced concrete pipe.
53. All abandoned irrigation lines serving the property shall be removed.
Hold Harmless and Indemnification Condition:
54. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Condition. Approval of this Project is for the benefit of the Applicant. The submittal of applications by the Applicant for this Project was a voluntary act on the part of the Applicant not required by the City. Therefore, as a condition of approval of this Project, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Fowler and its agents, officers, consultants, independent contractors and employees (“City”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City concerning the Project, and for any and all costs, attorney’s fees, and damages arising therefrom (collectively “Claim”). The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 5 Nothing in this condition shall obligate the City to defend any Claim and the City shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by the City, unless the City approves the settlement in writing. Nor shall the City be prohibited from independently defending any Claim, and if the City decides to independently defend a Claim, the Applicant shall be responsible for City’s attorney’s fees, expenses of litigation and costs for that independent defense. Should the City decide to independently defend any Claim, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim unless the Applicant approves the settlement.
Signature of Applicant: ____________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER
ITEM NO: 9-Aiii
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
March 21, 2023
FROM THOMAS W. GAFFERY IV, Community and Economic Development Director
SUBJECT
Consider INTRODUCTION of Ordinance 2023-06, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Fowler amending sections 1-8.02 and 1-8.08 of Chapter 8, of Title 1, of the Fowler Municipal Code regarding administrative citations; adding Chapter 25 to Title 5 regarding the regulation of short-term rentals; adding section 6-2.313 of Article 3, of Chapter 2, of Title 6 regarding violations of unauthorized dumping of trash; and amending Chapters 2, 3, 7, 9, and 10 of Title 8 to provide updates to the City’s adoption of the California Administrative, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical, and Dangerous Buildings Codes.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend the City Council approve the introduction Ordinance 2023-06, to amend the City’s administrative citations procedures, provide regulations relating to short-term rentals, adding provisions regarding unauthorized dumping, and to adopt the most recent versions of the California Administrative, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical, and Dangerous Buildings Codes with existing local amendments.
BACKGROUND
Administrative Citation Revisions
The City’s current provisions related to the issuance of administrative citations allow for certain fines to be imposed against those individuals in violation of the City Municipal Code. Part of the Code differentiates fine amounts for violations of a “building or safety code”. The proposed Ordinance would add a definition for a “building or safety code” to refer to Title 8 of the City’s Municipal Code which provides building regulations adopted by the City. The proposed Ordinance also amends the fine amounts that may be issued to a person in accordance with state law. The purpose of the amendments is to provide clarity and consistency when issuing administrative citations to individuals in violation of the City’s Code.
Introduction of Ordinance 2023-06
March 21, 2023
Short-Term Rental Provisions
The trend of converting residential units into full- or part-time vacation rentals has become increasingly popular, especially in vacation destination communities or those near vacation destinations. The growing industry of online marketing sites such as Airbnb, VRBO, Homeaway, Vacasa and many others are making short-term rentals more accessible to vacationers and travelers than ever before. Staff is aware that one or more short-term vacation rentals exist within the City.
These short-term rental businesses compete with businesses such as hotels, which required some formal City approval prior to opening. Besides having no formal approvals, the City cannot consistently collect Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue from short-term vacation rental operations since it unclear which property owners are operating short-term rentals. The proposed Ordinance is intended to proactively address the impacts of short-term rentals, and to assist in the collection of TOT.
Although the City’s TOT ordinance covers short-term rentals, the burden on staff to track down and enforce these provisions against property owners prevents such collection. Furthermore, there is concern among some citizens that short-term rentals negatively impact neighborhood character and contribute to other nuisances, including noise and on-street parking impacts.
On the other hand, some short-term rental owners earn income to supplement or cover housing costs.
Short-term rentals also provide travelers and tourists with an alternative to traditional lodging and dining establishments and provide a unique view into life in our community. Guests can select from a variety of housing options and have a unique experience of staying in a home in a neighborhood. Short-term rentals may potentially increase tourism and boost the local economy.
The proposed Ordinance includes operational standards and criteria designed to reduce complaints and conflicts with neighboring residents and provide staff with the tools needed to promptly and effectively respond to non-compliance issues.
Highlights of the proposed operational standards and regulations on short term rentals are summarized below:
• Establishes permitted occupancy limits for short-term rentals; • “Quiet time” would be established between 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m., during which outdoor activities would be restricted to minimize the potential for disturbances; • Short-term rental owners/operators would be required to designate a “Host” or local contact person who must be available 24/7 to respond to calls regarding violations; • Short-term rental owners/operators would have an affirmative obligation to ensure their occupants are informed of the operational requirements that apply to them, and owners and designated persons responsible for the occupants are subject to citation for violating the ordinance;
• The ordinance limits short-term rentals to housing structures comprised of no greater than two (2) residential units, in order to avoid the problems associated with larger apartment or condominium buildings becoming short-term rental “hotels”; • The ordinance provides requirements as to the minimum number of available off-street parking spaces, and operational standards regarding trash storage and pickup; Introduction of Ordinance 2023-06
March 21, 2023
• All short-term rentals would be required to pay the City’s TOT, and to always maintain a valid Fowler business license.
Unauthorized Dumping
This ordinance would make it a violation for any person to dispose of any waste material in or upon any public property or right-of-way, except as provided by the Fowler Municipal Code. There is not currently a provision specifically addressing unauthorized dumping of waste material in the City’s Code. This provision would provide an enforcement mechanism for staff to be able to cite individuals who unlawfully dump waste material on public property.
Adoption of Updated Building Standards
Every three (3) years, the California Building Standards Commission ("Commission") reviews and modifies the California Building Codes, including but not limited to the California Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, and Administrative Code. The 2022 editions were published July 1, 2022. The Fowler Municipal Code Chapters 8-2, 8-7, and 8-10 adopt these Codes, which are adopted or modified with local amendments as necessary to ensure the safety of the community. This ordinance would update these codes to their most recently updated versions.
This ordinance would also update the City’s Housing Code (Ch. 8-3) and Dangerous Buildings Code (Ch. 8-9) to their most recent versions which were updated in 1997. The City currently adopts the 1991 and 1994 versions of these codes.
Adopting these updated codes ensures compliance with existing standards adopted by the State.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Ordinance does not constitute a “project” as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the Ordinance could result in an increase in both Transient Occupancy Taxes and business license fees to the City from individuals operating under the proposed short-term rental provisions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.
Attachment:
- Ordinance No. 2023-06 J:\wdocs\00250\041\RPT\01024011.DOCX
ORDINANCE 2023-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER AMENDING SECTIONS 1-8.02 AND 1-8.08 OF CHAPTER 8, OF TITLE 1, OF THE FOWLER MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS; ADDING CHAPTER 25 TO TITLE 5 REGARDING THE REGULATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS; ADDING SECTION 6-2.313 TO ARTICLE 3, OF CHAPTER 2, OF TITLE 6 REGARDING VIOLATIONS OF UNAUTHORIZED DUMPING OF TRASH; AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 2, 3, 7, 9, AND 10 OF TITLE 8 TO PROVIDE UPDATES TO THE CITY’S ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE, ELECTRICAL, HOUSING, MECHANICAL, AND DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Title 1, Chapter 8, Section 1-8.08 of the Fowler Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-8.02 – Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
“Building or Safety Code” shall refer to the codes adopted under Title 8 [Building Regulations] of the Fowler Municipal Code.
"City Manager" shall mean the City Manager for the City of Fowler or his or her designated representative.
"Enforcement Officer" means any person authorized to enforce violations of the Municipal Code. "Hearing Officer" means any person appointed by the City Manager to preside over the administrative hearings provided for by this chapter.
"Person" means any natural person, firm, association, business, trust, organization, corporation, partnership, company or any other entity.
"Responsible Party" means any person who is responsible for violating the provisions of the Municipal Code as more particularly described in Section 1-8.04, subdivision (A) of this Chapter.
SECTION 2: Title 1, Chapter 8, Section 1-8.08 of the Fowler Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-8.08 – Fines assessed.
A. Unless otherwise specified below, the amount of the fine assessed for each administrative citation issued for the same violation(s) within any twelve (12) month period shall be as follows:
1. First administrative citation — $50.00 $100.00;
2. Second administrative citation — $100.00 $500.00;
3. Third and subsequent administrative citations administrative citation — $200.00 $1,000.00.
4. Fourth administrative citation — $500.00;
5. Fifth and subsequent administrative citation — $1,000.00; B. Unless otherwise specified below, For for violations that are automatically deemed infractions, the amount of the fine assessed for each administrative citation issued for the same violation(s) within any twelve (12) month period shall be as follows: under the Municipal Code, the maximum fine shall be $500.00, unless the violation is of a building or safety code, in which case the maximum fine shall be $1,000.00.
1. First administrative citation – $100.00;
2. Second administrative citation – $200.00;
3. Third and subsequent administrative citations – $500.00.
C. For violations of the Municipal Code pertaining to the possession or use of illegal fireworks, the amount of the fine assessed for each administrative citation issued for the same violation(s) within any twelve (12) month period shall be as follows:
1. First and subsequent administrative citations — $1,000.00.
D. For any violation of a Building or Safety Code, the amount of the fine assessed for each administrative citation issued shall not exceed $1,000.00.
For purposes of this subdivision, the Enforcement Officer issuing an administrative citation shall determine if the Building or Safety Code violated by the Responsible Party constitutes an immediate threat to health and safety.
E. For the purposes of this section, the "same violation" shall mean violation(s) of the same code section, even if they occur at a different location.
F E. All fines assessed shall be payable to the City of Fowler. The failure of any person to timely pay a fine assessed by administrative citation shall result in the assessment of an additional late fee to be charged. The amount of the late fee shall be ten (10) percent of the total amount of the administrative fine owed.
G F. Payment of the fine shall not excuse the failure to correct the violation, nor shall it bar further enforcement action by the City.
H. G. Notwithstanding the fine schedules set forth in this section, the City Council may adopt a policy or policies authorizing the Enforcement Officer to issue a lower dollar citation than otherwise allowed for the same violation(s) within any twelve-month period.
SECTION 3: Chapter 25, of Title 5, of the Fowler Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:
Chapter 25 – Short-Term Rentals
5-25.01 – Purpose and Intent.
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide property owners and residents with operating standards to conduct short-term rentals of single-family homes or other dwelling units within the City of Fowler. The intent of this Chapter is to ensure that property owners operate short-term rentals in a manner that upholds the safe and quiet enjoyment of Fowler neighborhoods and provides for accountability for any issues that arise from properties being used as short-term rentals. 5-25.02 – Definitions.
For the purposes of this Chapter, the following definitions apply:
“Advertisement” means any method used to solicit interest in the short-term rental, including internet-based listing or hosting services.
“Applicant” means the person applying for a business license in accordance with Chapter 1, of Title 3 of the Fowler Municipal Code for a short-term rental. “Booking Transaction” means the reservation of a Short-Term Rental between a Permittee and a prospective Lodger.
“City Manager” means the City Manager or their designee. “CC&Rs” (also known as “covenants, conditions, and restrictions”) means limitations and rules placed on a group of homes by a builder, developer, neighborhood association, or homeowner association.
“Dwelling” means only those habitable portions of a building designed for and/or occupied as a residence by one (1) family or individual.
“Host” shall mean the Owner or the designated agent of the Owner who is responsible for compliance with this section. This person designated by an Owner or the Owner’s agent, who, if designated to act as such, shall be available to respond to notification of a complaint regarding the Short-Term Rental Unit, and take remedial action necessary, as required under subsection K of section 5-25.03. The Host will act as the local contact person for the Short-Term Rental Unit.
“Hosting Platform” means a person who collects or receives a fee, directly or indirectly, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation, including an internet-based platform.
“Lodger” means a person to whom a Permittee is providing lodging for compensation. “Lodger” includes any guests that may accompany the person renting the Short-Term Rental Unit from the Permittee.
“Lot” means a parcel of land shown on a subdivision map or a record of survey map recorded in the office of the county recorder with a separate and distinct number or letter, or a parcel described by metes and bounds, or a building site in one ownership having an area for each main building as hereinafter required in each zone. “Owner” shall mean the person(s) or entity(ies) that holds legal or equitable title to a Dwelling. “Owner” includes a lessee.
“Permittee” means the person to whom a business license for a Short-Term Rental is issued.
“Primary Residence” means the Dwelling in which the Applicant or Permittee resides for at least half of the calendar year, or one hundred and eighty-four (184) days during the calendar year.
“Short-Term Rental” shall mean the rental of a Dwelling or a portion thereof by the Owner to another person or group of persons for occupancy, lodging or sleeping purposes for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days. The rental of units within City-approved hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, and time-share projects shall not be considered Short-Term Rentals. Short-term rentals do not constitute a home occupation as provided in Section 9-5.21.22 of the Fowler Municipal Code. “Short-Term Rental Unit” shall mean the habitable interior space of a Dwelling, or any portion thereof, that is being rented, or is intended to be rented, as a Short-Term Rental to a person or group of persons.
“Transient Occupancy Tax” means the tax imposed under Chapter 6, of Title 3, of the Fowler Municipal Code.
5-25.03 – Operating Standards for Short-Term Rentals.
A. The Owner of a Short-Term Rental Unit shall apply to the City for a business license in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1, of Title 3 of the Fowler Municipal Code, prior to booking a Short-Term Rental to a Lodger. Within ten (10) calendar days following the issuance of such business license for a Short-Term Rental, the Owner shall mail or personally deliver in writing the following information to the owners and occupants of properties contiguous to and directly across the street (or alley or other right-of-way) from the Short-Term Rental: the name and telephone number of the person, whether the Owner or the Host, who shall be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week to respond to complaints regarding the use, condition, operation or conduct of Lodgers of a Short-Term Rental Unit. Thereafter, within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the business license, the Owner shall submit to the City Manager under penalty of perjury, a dated written certification that the required mailing or delivery was completed. At any time during the pendency of a business license for a Short-Term Rental that such information changes, the Owner shall promptly mail or personally deliver in writing the updated information to maintain accuracy and shall also promptly submit to the City Manager, written certification under penalty of perjury that the required mailing or delivery of the updated information was completed.
B. The Owner of a Short-Term Rental Unit shall not be relieved of any personal responsibility or personal liability for noncompliance with any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject Short-Term Rental Unit, regardless of whether such noncompliance was committed by the Owner’s agent, Host, or the Lodgers of the Owner’s Short-Term Rental Unit.
C. The Owner shall ensure that the Short-Term Rental Unit(s) comply with all applicable codes regarding fire, building and safety, health and safety, and all other relevant laws, regulations and ordinances, obtain all permits required, and pay all applicable fees.
D. While a Dwelling is rented as a Short-Term Rental Unit, the Owner or Host shall be available by telephone twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week to respond to complaints regarding the use, condition, operation or conduct of occupants of a Short-Term Rental Unit. The Owner or Host must be on the premises of the Short-Term Rental at the request of an enforcement officer or the City’s Police Department within forty-five (45) minutes of contact to satisfactorily correct or take remedial action necessary to resolve any complaint, alleged nuisance or violation of this Chapter occurring at the Short-Term Rental. Failure of the Owner or Host to respond to calls or complaints in a timely and appropriate manner shall be grounds for imposition of penalties as set forth in this Chapter and/or Chapter 8, of Title 1.
E. Short-Term Rental Unit(s) shall be used only for overnight lodging accommodations. At no time shall a Short-Term Rental Unit be used for weddings, receptions, parties, commercial functions, advertised conferences, or other similar assemblies that are separate from the purpose of lodging.
F. All advertising appearing in any written publication or on any website that promotes the availability or existence of a Short-Term Rental shall include the City-issued business license number as part of the rental offering. No person shall advertise the use of a Dwelling as a ShortTerm Rental unless the City has approved a business license for Short-Term Rentals pursuant to this Chapter.
G. Only the habitable interior portions of a Dwelling shall be utilized as a Short-Term Rental. No garages, tents, camper trailers, recreational vehicles, or other exterior structures or spaces are permissible as Short-Term Rentals.
H. In any Advertisement concerning the availability of a Dwelling as a Short-Term Rental, the Owner or Host shall advertise the maximum number of occupants allowed to occupy the Short-Term Rental Unit.
I. All vehicles of Lodgers of a Short-Term Rental Unit shall be parked only in an approved driveway or garage on the Short-Term Rental Unit. The maximum number of vehicles allowed on a Short-Term Rental Unit shall be limited to the number of available off-street parking spaces; however, such property must have a minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces. The Owner shall provide access to the garage of the Dwelling if that area has been included in the determination of the number of available off-street parking spaces pursuant to this Chapter. In no event shall off-street parking include the use of landscaped areas, any private or public sidewalk, parkway, walkway or alley (or any portion thereof) located on, at or adjacent to the short-term rental property, or the blocking of the driveway or street in front of said property. The term “sidewalk” shall include that portion of a driveway that is delineated for pedestrian travel or is in the public right-of-way.
J. No on-site exterior signs shall be posted advertising the availability of a Dwelling as a Short-Term Rental Unit.
K. If an enforcement officer has received a complaint concerning a suspected violation of this Chapter or of the Fowler Municipal Code, or any applicable law, rule, or regulation pertaining to the use or occupancy of a Short-Term Rental Unit, or if the enforcement officer has reason to believe that such a violation has occurred, the enforcement officer may notify the Owner or Host of the complaint or suspected violation and the notified person shall cooperate in facilitating the investigation and the correction of the suspected violation. Failure of the Owner or Host to affirmatively respond to the officer’s request within forty-five (45) minutes by reasonably cooperating in facilitating the investigation and the correction of the suspected violation shall be deemed to be a violation of this Chapter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is not intended that an Owner or the Host act as a peace officer or place themselves in an at-risk situation.
L. No musical instrument, phonograph, loudspeaker, amplified or reproduced sound, or any machine or device for the production or reproduction of any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of a Short-Term Rental Unit between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.
M. Lodgers shall not engage in outdoor activities on a Short-Term Rental Unit between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. that involve the use of swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, tennis and paddleboard courts, play equipment and other similar and related improvements. The hours between 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. are considered to be “quiet time,” where all activities at a Short-Term Rental property shall be conducted inside of a Short-Term Rental Unit so that no outdoor activity will disturb the peace and quiet of the neighborhood adjacent to a Short-Term Rental property or cause discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area.
N. Trash and refuse shall not be left stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection by the responsible trash hauler, as set forth in Section 6-2.302, which provides for containers to be placed at the curb on the day of pickup and removed by noon the following day. The Owner of a Short-Term Rental property shall provide sufficient trash collection containers and service to meet the demand of the Lodgers. The Short-Term Rental property shall be free of debris both on-site and in the adjacent portion of the street.
O. It is unlawful for any Owner, Lodger, occupant, renter, person present upon, Host, or person having charge or possession of a Short-Term Rental to make or continue or cause to be made or continued any loud, unnecessary or unusual noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area, or violates any provision of Chapter 21, of Title 5 of the Fowler Municipal Code.
P. The Owner and Host shall ensure that the occupants of a Short-Term Rental Unit do not create unreasonable noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct, or violate provisions of this Code or any State law pertaining to noise, disorderly conduct, overcrowding, the consumption of alcohol, or the use of illegal drugs. Owners and Hosts are expected to take any measures necessary to abate disturbances, including, but not limited to, directing the Lodgers of a Short-Term Rental Unit to cease the disturbing conduct, calling for law enforcement services or enforcement officers, removing the occupant(s), or taking any other action necessary to immediately abate the disturbance.
Q. The Owner shall post a sign at a conspicuous location within the Short-Term Rental Unit advising Lodgers of all rules and operational standards imposed upon Lodgers under this Section.
R. All Short-Term Rentals shall be subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, as required by Chapter 6, of Title 3, of the Fowler Municipal Code. The Owner shall also maintain at all times a valid Fowler business license, as required by Chapter 1, of Title 3 of the Fowler Municipal Code.
S. Short-Term Rentals shall not exceed one unit per address in any multiple-family complex comprised of two (2) or more residential units.
T. No person shall operate a Short-Term Rental in violation of the applicable CC&Rs or similar regulations applicable to the Lot.
5-25.04 – Occupancy Limits.
A. No Permittee shall rent to more than six (6) people per Short-Term Rental Booking Transaction.
B. Notwithstanding subdivision A, if the Permittee’s Primary Residence is not on the same Lot as the Short-Term Rental, the Permittee shall not rent to more than six (6) people per Lot.
C. If the Short-Term Rental Unit is not the Permittee’s Primary Residence, no Permittee shall provide lodging for compensation for more than an aggregate of ninety (90) days in any calendar year.
5-25.05 – Lodger Registration Information.
A. A Permittee shall keep a register that documents the following information:
1. All dates on which the Permittee provided lodging for compensation;
2. The number of Lodgers on each date; and
3. The amount of rent paid by Lodgers for each night of lodging.
B. A Permittee shall maintain this register in a printed format for at least three (3) years and, except as provided in subdivision C below, shall provide the register to the City upon request.
C. For Short-Term Rentals that are not the Primary Residence of the Permittee, the Permittee shall provide an updated copy of the register to the City each January and July, by sending or delivering the register to the City Manager.
5-25.06 – Hosting Platform Responsibilities.
A. No Hosting Platform shall accept a fee for any Booking Transaction unless the Owner or Host has a valid City-issued business license for Short-Term Rentals.
B. A Hosting Platform is, and has the responsibilities of, an operator as provided in Section 3-6.02, subdivision (c), for the limited purposes of collecting the Transient Occupancy Tax for a Booking Transaction and remitting the tax to the City in accordance with Section 3-6.09 and keeping and preserving records for City inspection in accordance with Section 3-6.14.
SECTION 4: Section 6-2.313 of Article 3, of Chapter 2, of Title 6 of the Fowler Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:
6-2.313 – Unauthorized Disposal of Solid Waste is Prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person to throw or deposit, or cause to be thrown or deposited, any solid waste in or upon any vacant lot, street, alley, gutter, highway, park or other public place or keep any solid waste, except in the manner prescribed by Chapter 2 of Title 6 of the Fowler Municipal Code.
SECTION 5: Section 8-2.01 of Chapter 8-2, Section 8-3.01 of Chapter 8-3, Section 8-7.01 of Chapter 8-7, Section 8-9.01 of Chapter 8-9, and Section 8-10.01 of Chapter 8-10, of Title 8 of the Fowler Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
8-2.01 – Adoption of the National Electrical Code.
The purpose for adopting this code is the practical safeguarding of persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity, installation of electrical conductors and equipment with or on public and private buildings and structures within the City of Fowler, as provided for in the 1993 Edition of the National Electrical Code as published by the National Fire Protection Association, three (3) copies of which are kept on file in the office of the City Clerk, one of which may be kept in the office of the Building Official.
For the purpose of regulating electrical systems, the 2022 California Electrical Code (CEC) promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission, which incorporates the adoption of the 2020 edition of the National Electrical Code, is hereby adopted by reference thereto as if fully set forth in this Chapter, save and except such portions as are deleted, modified, or amended by the provisions of this Chapter. Copies of the 2022 California Electrical Code are on file in the office of the City Clerk and Building Official. Any changes made by the California Building Standards Commission applicable to the City, including new editions, shall be deemed incorporated herein. If any conflicts between this Code and any other City, State or Federal Code should arise, the most restrictive Code providing the highest level of safety as determined by the Building Official shall prevail.
8-3.01 – Adoption of the Uniform Housing Code.
For the purpose of providing minimum requirements and standards for the protection of life, limb, health, property, safety and welfare of the general public, and of the owners and occupants of residential buildings and structures within the City of Fowler, the City adopts the 1994 1997 Edition of the Uniform Housing Code as prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials, three (3) copies of which are kept on file in the office of the City Clerk, one of the three (3) copies may be kept on file in the office of the Building Official.
8-7.01 – Adoption of the Uniform Mechanical Code.
The City adopts the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code, for the purpose of regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, erection, installation, alteration, repair, location, relocation, replacement, addition to, use or maintenance of heating, ventilation, cooling, refrigeration systems, incinerators, or other miscellaneous heat-producing appliances in the City of Fowler; providing for the issuance of permits and collection, of fees, three copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, one of the three (3) copies may be kept in the office of the Building Official.
For the purpose of regulating mechanical systems, the 2022 California Mechanical Code (CMC) promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission, which incorporates the adoption of the 2021 edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code, excluding Table 114.1, is hereby adopted by reference thereto as if fully set forth in this Chapter, save and except for portions as are deleted, modified, or amended by the provisions of this Chapter. Copies of the 2022 California Mechanical Code are on file in the office of the City Clerk and Building Official. Any changes made by the California Building Standards Commission applicable to the City, including new editions, shall be deemed incorporated herein. If any conflicts between this Code and any other City, State or Federal Code should arise, the most restrictive Code providing the highest level of safety as determined by the Building Official shall prevail.
8-9.01 – Adoption of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings.
For the purpose of providing a just, equitable and practical method, to be cumulative with and in addition to any other remedy provided by the Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition, or Uniform Housing Code 1991 Edition, or otherwise available at law, whereby buildings or structures, which from any cause endanger the life, limb, health, morals, property, safety, or welfare of the general public or their occupants, may be required to be repaired, vacated, or demolished, the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials, three (3) copies of which have been filed for the use and examination of the public in the office of the City Clerk as provided by Section 50022.1, et seq., of the Government Code of the State, is hereby adopted by reference thereto as if fully set forth in this chapter.
For the purpose of providing a just, equitable, and practicable method, to be cumulative with and in addition to any other remedy provided by the Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition, or Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, or otherwise available at law, whereby buildings or structures, which from any cause endanger the life, limb, health, morals, property, safety, or welfare of the general public or their occupants, may be required to be repaired, vacated, or demolished, the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials, three (3) copies of which have been filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the City Clerk as provided by Section 50022.1 et seq. of the
Government Code of the State, is hereby adopted by reference thereto as if fully set forth in this chapter.
8-10.01 – Adoption of the Uniform Administrative Code.
For the purpose of regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, conversion, demolition, occupancy, equipment, use height area, and maintenance of all buildings and structures and equipment as therefor in the City of Fowler, and providing for the issuance of permits and the collection of fees therefor, the City adopts the 1994 edition of the Uniform Administrative Code and all appendix, as prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, one of the three (3) copies may be kept on file in the office of the Building Official.
For the purpose of regulating mechanical systems, the 2022 California Administrative Code promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference thereto as if fully set forth in this Chapter, save and except for portions as are deleted, modified, or amended by the provisions of this Chapter. Copies of the 2022 California Administrative Code are on file in the office of the City Clerk and Building Official. Any changes made by the California Building Standards Commission applicable to the City, including new editions, shall be deemed incorporated herein. If any conflicts between this Code and any other City, State or Federal Code should arise, the most restrictive Code providing the highest level of safety as determined by the Building Official shall prevail.
SECTION 6: Severability Clause.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such a decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Fowler hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk is further directed to cause this ordinance or a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Fowler, within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on March 21, 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council held on ____________________, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
___________________________
Daniel T. Parra, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, Deputy City Clerk
J:\wdocs\00250\041\ord\01023843.DOCX