Agenda packet — Fowler City Council, January 21, 2025

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2025 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625 AGENDA
This meeting is being conducted by teleconference at the following locations: Fowler City Council Chamber, 128 S. 5th Street, Fowler, CA 93625; and Hyatt Regency Sacramento, hotel lobby, 1209 L. Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Each teleconference location is open to the public and any member of the public has the opportunity to address the City Council from a teleconference location in the same manner as if that person attended the meeting location. The City Council will control the conduct of the meeting and determine the appropriate order and time limitations on public comments from the teleconference locations.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance or accommodations to access the City Council Chambers or participate in this meeting, please contact the Clerk at (559) 834-3113 x102. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you may attend in person, you may appear by telephone as described below, or you may submit written comments via email to [email protected]. Please include your name and reference the agenda item you are commenting on, if any. Written comments received that do not specify an agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda. Emails received by 8:00 am on the date of the meeting will be provided to the City Council at the meeting and made part of the record of proceedings but will not be read aloud.

En cumplimiento con la Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades si necesita asistencia o adaptaciones para acceder a las Cámaras del Concejo de la Ciudad o participar en esta reunión, comuníquese con el secretario de la ciudad al (559) 834-3113 x102. También puede ponerse en contacto con el secretario si necesita servicios de traducción. La notificación al menos 48 horas antes de la reunión permitirá a la Ciudad hacer arreglos razonables para garantizar la accesibilidad.
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87953791089?pwd=4ixTyjhMsrme9VSTD6RkwizFIcnALQ.uDstknAH IApOcg6v
Telephone Number: (253) 215-8782
Meeting ID: 879 5379 1089
Passcode: 277118
Persons accessing the meeting will have an opportunity to provide comments at appropriate times during the meeting. To speak during a public comment period, press *9 on your phone to raise your hand or click “raise hand” in the webinar. At the appropriate 1 time, you will be prompted to unmute yourself, and asked to identify yourself when providing public comment.

Any writing or document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the City's website at https://fowlercity.org.

Resolutions and Ordinances - With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Councilmember that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, further reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

4. INVOCATION BY PASTOR MARK GRICE OF THE WORSHIP CENTRE

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation to Outgoing Recreation Commissioner Susie Rico-Vasquez

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council on any matter not described on this agenda. Presentations are limited to 3 minutes per person and no more than 15 minutes per topic.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and include a recommended action from Staff and shall be acted on by one motion of the Council. If a Councilmember requests additional information or would like to pull an item for discussion, that item shall be pulled from the Consent Calendar and acted upon separately. A Councilmember may register an action on an individual item without pulling the item from the Consent Calendar. A motion to approve the Consent Calendar is deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of ordinances, only those which received a unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present at introduction shall be eligible for placement on the Consent Calendar.
8A. RATIFY Pay Warrants for January 21, 2025
8B. APPROVE Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Meeting 2 8C. APPROVE Resolution No. 2763, Adopting the Fowler Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

9. CONTESTED CONSENT CALENDAR
Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be heard individually immediately after action is taken on the Consent Calendar.

10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Planning
10A. INTRODUCTION of Ordinance No. 2025-01 amending sections 4-4.203, 4-4.209, 4-

4.210 and 4-4.212 of Chapter 4 of Title 4, and adding Article 7 to Chapter 4 of Title 4 of the Fowler Municipal Code related to on-street parking of semi-trucks within the City
10B. ADOPT Resolution No. 2764 Approving an updated fee schedule for Planning Fees and Development Impact Fees
Police Department
10C. APPROVE a Second Amendment in the amount of $195,160 to the agreement with Dewberry Architects, Inc., for a total amount of $876,168 for design, bidding and construction support costs for the David T. Cardenas Police Headquarters and Senior Center and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the amendment Public Works
10D. Actions pertaining to Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program projects:
i. REJECT all Donny Wright Park Shade Structure Improvement Project construction bids due to bid amounts exceeding grant funding
ii. REJECT all Harris Park Improvement Project construction bids due to bid amounts exceeding grant funding
10E. Actions pertaining to the 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7:
i. AWARD a construction contract to HPS Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $4,356,800 and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the agreement ii. APPROVE a professional services agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group in the amount of $192,745 for construction management, observation, and inspection services for the Project and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the agreement
iii. APPROVE Budget Resolution No. 2765 allocating funding for the Project 3 11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

12. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

13. CLOSED SESSION
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Conference with legal counsel - Anticipated litigation
Significant exposure to litigation
Unknown number of cases but at least one
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Conference with legal counsel - Anticipated litigation
Deciding whether to initiate litigation
Two potential cases
Government Code Section 54957(a)
Threat to public services or facilities
Consultation with: Thomas W. Gaffery IV, Interim City Manager Government Code Section 54957
Public employee performance evaluation
Interim City Manager

14. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION

15. ADJOURN
Next Ordinance No. 2025-02
Next Resolution No. 2766
CERTIFICATION: I, Angela Vasquez, City Clerk of the City of Fowler, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review on Friday, January 17, 2025.

Angela Vasquez, CPMC
City Clerk
4 CHECK NUMBERS CHECK DATES AMOUNT

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
Regular checks 44006-44106 January 3 thru January 15 443,777.17 $ TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS 443,777.17 $

PAYROLL COSTS
TOTAL PAYROLL COSTS - $

TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS 443,777.17 $
NOTE:

Check #44056 Void Check
Check #44057 Void Check
Check #44099 Void Check

CITY OF FOWLER

WARRANTS LIST
January 21, 2025
5 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6020 5121 NAME PLATE ADMIN 0.00 12.95 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6150 5100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 39.17 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6700 5110 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 58.74 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6200 5205 SUPPLIES-PW FLEET 0.00 147.73 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6200 5205 SUPPLIES- PW FLEET 0.00 11.98 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6400 5110 TRNK OR TRT REC 0.00 336.80 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6080 5110 BUS MEMBERSHIP FEE 0.00 543.79 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6260 5203 FENCING-PARKS 0.00 644.96 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,796.12
1001 44009 01/02/25 14867 ASHLEY PANELLA 6700 5110 SENIOR PAINT 12/19/ 0.00 150.00 1001 44010 01/02/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 BATTERY-NETWORK 0.00 442.43 1001 44011 01/02/25 15119 BOB MURRAY & ASSOCI 6020 5220 CM RECRUITMENT 0.00 1,000.00 1001 44012 01/02/25 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNA 6150 5150 PHN-ORD 24-05 0.00 130.00 1001 44012 01/02/25 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNA 6150 5150 PHN-ORD 24-06 0.00 406.25 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 536.25
1001 44013 01/02/25 11268 CITY OF SELMA 6270 5220 ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS 0.00 4,500.00 1001 44014 01/02/25 10064 COLONIAL LIFE INSUR 100 2042 EMP DED DEC24 0.00 47.42 1001 44015 01/02/25 14512 CSG CONSULTANTS 6160 5225 PLAN CHECK AUG24 0.00 131.00 1001 44015 01/02/25 14512 CSG CONSULTANTS 6160 5225 PLAN CHECK OCT 24 0.00 393.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 524.00
1001 44016 01/02/25 10077 DALE BRISCO, INC 6200 5195 TRAFFIC SIGN BRACE 0.00 540.67 1001 44017 01/02/25 13826 ECS IMAGING INC 6150 5220 LASERFICHE RNWL 202 0.00 681.19 1001 44017 01/02/25 13826 ECS IMAGING INC 6020 5220 LASERFICHE RNWL 202 0.00 681.21 1001 44017 01/02/25 13826 ECS IMAGING INC 6025 5220 LASERFICHE RNWL 202 0.00 681.21 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,043.61
1001 44018 01/02/25 10114 FOWLER BUTANE SERVI 6200 5200 PROPANE- FORKLIFT 0.00 16.52 1001 44019 01/02/25 10104 FPOA 100 2045 EMP DED 12/31/24 0.00 200.00 1001 44020 01/02/25 11018 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 1,191.10 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6030 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 372.46 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6200 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 935.82 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6700 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 953.32 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6025 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,084.95 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6150 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,119.27 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6400 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,201.63 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 100 2041 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,260.00 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6020 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,795.55 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6260 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 1,871.64 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6160 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 2,166.16 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6220 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 2,194.89 6 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 6120 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 12,522.85 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 27,478.54
1001 44023 01/02/25 14269 LOUIE'S PORTABLE WE 6260 5203 DW PARK GATE REPAIR 0.00 170.00 1001 44024 01/02/25 10203 MID VALLEY PACKAGIN 6020 5100 COPY PAPER 0.00 257.47 1001 44025 01/02/25 14428 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUT 6020 5220 COBRA/OE DEC24 0.00 220.63 1001 44026 01/02/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWA 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 38.99 1001 44026 01/02/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWA 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 46.81 1001 44026 01/02/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWA 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 51.98 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 137.78
1001 44027 01/02/25 15152 OUTDOOR CREATIONS I 6260 5710 MONUMENT SIGN-PARKS 0.00 7,436.58 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 SUMER&MOGNOLA12/13/ 0.00 6.41 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-F HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 11.33 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 SUMNER/HW99 12/13/2 0.00 12.81 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-E HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 12.95 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 TSFR 3LTS 12/13/24 0.00 13.71 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 8TH/VINE 12/13/24 0.00 17.19 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-A HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 20.79 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 ADAMS/DEEAN 12/13/2 0.00 21.00 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 TR5090 12/13/24 0.00 30.76 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 TEMP/PARL 12/13/24 0.00 44.83 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS2-A HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 44.83 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-F HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 48.07 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS2-A HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 66.62 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 3079 MANN 12/19/24 0.00 98.45 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 TR5041 12/13/24 0.00 116.95 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 TRACT 5212 12/13/24 0.00 136.16 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 T5088 12/13/24 0.00 145.29 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 GLDST/VLY DR 12/13/ 0.00 211.65 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 ADAMS/TEMP 12/13/24 0.00 213.30 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 SOUTH&SUNNY 12/13/2 0.00 223.55 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 CLAYTON/ARMST12/13/ 0.00 266.52 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-C HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 339.30 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-F HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 412.97 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 630 W FRESNO 12/20/ 0.00 577.61 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-A 12/13/24 0.00 804.60 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS2-A HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 1,012.77 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS1-E HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 1,117.24 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 LS2-A HWY LT 12/13/ 0.00 1,564.84 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 7,592.50
1001 44029 01/02/25 12384 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 6170 5180 LEASE 7/1/24-12/31/ 0.00 36.48 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 105.75 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6200 5200 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 105.76 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 160.43 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 172.51 7 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 285.71 1001 44031 01/02/25 14479 RG POWER 6200 5200 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 285.72 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,115.88
1001 44032 01/02/25 14358 SPARKLETTS 6020 5121 WTR SVC-DEC 24 0.00 142.59 1001 44032 01/02/25 14358 SPARKLETTS 6120 5121 WTR SVC-DEC 24 0.00 142.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 285.19
1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6700 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 33.52 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6400 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 40.22 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6150 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 49.67 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6025 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 64.28 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6220 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 70.47 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6030 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 87.23 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6020 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 92.81 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6160 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 152.56 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6200 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 245.34 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6260 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 379.37 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 100 2046 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 592.76 1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6120 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 938.42 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,746.65
1001 44034 01/02/25 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 6260 5182 RENT-DUMP TRAILER 0.00 177.24 1001 44034 01/02/25 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 6200 5182 RENT-SCISSOR LIFT 0.00 1,785.07 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,962.31
1001 44035 01/02/25 15153 THE SEGAL CO WESTER 6020 5220 BENEFITS STUDY 0.00 29,000.00 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6120 5185 MATS/MOPS 0.00 8.29 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6020 5185 MATS/MOPS 0.00 29.65 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6200 5185 UNIFORMS-STREETS 0.00 64.99 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6700 5185 JANITORIAL-SN CTR 0.00 80.68 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6200 5185 UNIFORMS-STREETS 0.00 89.83 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 273.44
1001 44037 01/02/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 6170 5160 WIFIHOTSPT11/24-12/ 0.00 40.01 1001 44037 01/02/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 6170 5160 CELL NOV-DEC PW 0.00 417.84 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 457.85
1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6700 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 9.85 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6400 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 11.82 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6150 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 13.78 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6025 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 17.73 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6220 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 19.69 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6030 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 24.60 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6020 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 27.56 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6160 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 45.27 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6200 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 52.39 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 100 2048 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 116.04 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6260 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 131.11 1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6120 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 275.71 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 745.55
8 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44039 01/02/25 14259 VISUAL EDGE IT INC 6170 5180 COPYSVC 12/23-1/22/ 0.00 807.08 1001 44040 01/02/25 14830 WILLDAN GROUP INC 6160 5225 INSPECTIONS NOV24 0.00 1,733.75 1001 44041 01/02/25 14290 XEROX FINANCIAL SER 6170 5180 LEASE DEC24 0.00 1,515.43 1001 44043 01/08/25 14813 24/7 PET VET 6270 5220 ANIMAL CARE 0.00 414.00 1001 44044 01/08/25 15013 ADVANCED PEST WIPEO 6020 5185 PEST CONTROL 12/30/ 0.00 90.00 1001 44045 01/08/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6025 5110 SUPPLIES-CITY CLERK 0.00 6.18 1001 44045 01/08/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6120 5100 SUPPLIES-POLICE 0.00 26.31 1001 44045 01/08/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6030 5100 OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIN 0.00 35.01 1001 44045 01/08/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6020 5110 SUPPLIES-ADMIN 0.00 52.05 1001 44045 01/08/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6120 5715 MEDICAL SUPPLIES-PD 0.00 148.76 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 268.31
1001 44046 01/08/25 15088 AT&T MOBILITY 6170 5160 FIRSTNET 11/12-12/1 0.00 1,101.52 1001 44048 01/08/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 ANNUAL SPAM LICENSE 0.00 799.95 1001 44048 01/08/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 VOIP JAN25 0.00 963.73 1001 44048 01/08/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 NETWORK SVCS JAN25 0.00 2,564.12 1001 44048 01/08/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 DESKTOP SVS JAN25 0.00 3,319.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 7,646.80
1001 44050 01/08/25 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNA 6150 5150 PHN-POST ADPT ORD24 0.00 113.75 1001 44050 01/08/25 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNA 6150 5150 PHN-INTRO ORD 24-04 0.00 308.75 1001 44050 01/08/25 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNA 6150 5150 PHN-INTRO ORD 25-01 0.00 308.75 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 731.25
1001 44053 01/08/25 14356 COMCAST 6170 5160 COMCAST DEC-JAN25 0.00 21.65 1001 44054 01/08/25 14188 DATA TICKET 6160 5220 ADMIN CITES NOV24 0.00 448.00 1001 44055 01/08/25 11282 DAWSON MAULDIN CONS 100 2061 WATER MAIN REPAIR 0.00 6,287.04 1001 44055 01/08/25 11282 DAWSON MAULDIN CONS 100 2061 WATER MAIN REPAIR 0.00 7,119.10 1001 44055 01/08/25 11282 DAWSON MAULDIN CONS 6200 5710 MERCED BANNER POLE 0.00 18,413.50 1001 44055 01/08/25 11282 DAWSON MAULDIN CONS 6200 5710 MERCED BANNER POLE 0.00 18,413.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 50,233.14
1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 -62.69 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 -3.71 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 1.63 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 2.60 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 2.62 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 2.71 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 3.26 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 4.51 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 5.00 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 5.98 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 6.53 9 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 6.53 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 7.17 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 7.18 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 8.15 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 8.71 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 9.36 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 10.89 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 13.02 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 13.11 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 13.25 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 14.04 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 14.16 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 14.16 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 14.35 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 15.24 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 15.25 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 15.25 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 15.63 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 16.31 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 17.43 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 18.52 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 19.61 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 23.64 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 23.74 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 23.96 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 25.25 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 28.31 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 28.33 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 29.41 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 30.47 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 30.47 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 30.75 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 32.68 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 35.90 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 37.02 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 38.07 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 40.94 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 43.12 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 44.64 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 45.76 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 47.86 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 53.69 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 54.38 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 54.48 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 58.75 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 66.80 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 79.88 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 81.71 1001 44058 01/08/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6200 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 452.91 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,798.68
1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 9.79 10 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 15.95 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 17.43 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 18.64 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 19.09 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 19.59 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 19.61 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 21.33 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 23.96 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 38.13 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 43.58 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 58.58 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 61.00 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 68.74 1001 44060 01/08/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6260 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 0.00 127.47 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 562.89
1001 44061 01/08/25 10124 FRESNO SHERIFF BUS 6120 5271 DISP SVC JAN25 0.00 10,976.83 1001 44062 01/08/25 10141 H & H TIRE SERVICES 6120 5205 VEHICLE REPAIR #25 0.00 25.00 1001 44062 01/08/25 10141 H & H TIRE SERVICES 6120 5205 VEH REPAIR #10 0.00 113.08 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 138.08
1001 44063 01/08/25 10145 HINDERLITER, DELLAM 6030 5220 CONT SVC OCT-DEC24 0.00 300.00 1001 44064 01/08/25 14749 HOFFMAN SECURITY 6170 5160 MONTHLY SVCS ACCESS 0.00 454.00 1001 44065 01/08/25 14575 JPRC PLUMBING INC 6700 5110 MAINT-SENIOR CTR 0.00 185.00 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 429 E MERCED 12/21/ 0.00 7.64 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6150 5170 122 S 5TH A 12/23/2 0.00 73.69 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6130 5170 220 E MAIN 12/23/24 0.00 121.48 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 202.81
1001 44068 01/08/25 14314 PERSONAL CONCEPTS 6700 5150 COMPLIANCE POSTER 2 0.00 75.74 1001 44068 01/08/25 14314 PERSONAL CONCEPTS 6150 5150 COMPLIANCE POSTER 2 0.00 75.74 1001 44068 01/08/25 14314 PERSONAL CONCEPTS 6120 5150 COMPLIANCE POSTER 2 0.00 75.74 1001 44068 01/08/25 14314 PERSONAL CONCEPTS 6025 5150 COMPLIANCE POSTER 2 0.00 75.74 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 302.96
1001 44069 01/08/25 14906 PLANETBIDS INC 6030 5220 PB AMEND 1 2024-202 0.00 1,883.49 1001 44071 01/08/25 10518 SIGNMAX! 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 67.94 1001 44071 01/08/25 10518 SIGNMAX! 6200 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 0.00 113.76 1001 44071 01/08/25 10518 SIGNMAX! 6200 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 0.00 185.81 1001 44071 01/08/25 10518 SIGNMAX! 6200 5195 SUPPLIES-STREETS 0.00 205.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 573.11
1001 44072 01/08/25 13355 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE 6260 5202 STREET MAINTENANCE 0.00 143.98 1001 44073 01/08/25 10085 STATE OF CA DEPARTM 6120 5310 PROF SVC-POLICE 0.00 280.00 1001 44074 01/08/25 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 6200 5182 RENT-MANLIFT 0.00 962.34 11 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44076 01/08/25 15083 THE CHLORINATOR POO 6260 5203 FOUNTAIN SVC DEC24 0.00 250.00 1001 44077 01/08/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6120 5185 MATS/MOPS 0.00 8.29 1001 44077 01/08/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6020 5185 MATS/MOPS 0.00 62.81 1001 44077 01/08/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6200 5185 UNIFORMS STREETS 0.00 76.07 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 147.17
1001 44078 01/08/25 13521 UNITY IT 6120 5230 USB SERVER NOV24 0.00 1,127.49 1001 44079 01/08/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 6170 5160 PHONES NOV-DEC FIN 0.00 136.72 1001 44079 01/08/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 6170 5160 CELL PHONE NOV-DEC2 0.00 176.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 313.22
1001 44080 01/08/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT 6120 5185 PROF SVCS-PD 0.00 8.16 1001 44084 01/14/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6260 5710 512 S. HARRIS AVE. 0.00 3,000.00 1001 44085 01/15/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6200 5110 SUPPLIES-ST 0.00 19.93 1001 44085 01/15/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6030 5100 SUPPLIES-FIN 0.00 32.49 1001 44085 01/15/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 6010 5110 SUPPLIES-COUNCIL 0.00 104.67 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 157.09
1001 44086 01/15/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 6170 5230 BATTERY-IT 0.00 272.38 1001 44088 01/15/25 11792 CA BUILDING STANDAR 6160 5272 CA BSASRF OCT24-SEP 0.00 480.60 1001 44089 01/15/25 14702 DAVE'S AUTO SERVICE 6200 5205 SVC F350 PW FLEET 0.00 833.00 1001 44090 01/15/25 10088 DEPARTMENT OF CONSE 6160 5220 CASEISMIC OCT24-DEC 0.00 1,558.89 1001 44092 01/15/25 14252 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6700 5121 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 26.13 1001 44092 01/15/25 14252 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 6700 5121 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 37.66 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 63.79
1001 44093 01/15/25 10114 FOWLER BUTANE SERVI 6200 5200 PROPANE FORKLIFT 0.00 2.57 1001 44095 01/15/25 10201 METRO UNIFORM & ACC 6150 5100 UNIFORMS-ZEPEDA 0.00 121.94 1001 44096 01/15/25 14843 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 6200 5205 SUPPLIES PW FLEET 0.00 408.65 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 5TH/FRESNO 1/2/25 0.00 9.40 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 MERCED/6TH 1/2/25 0.00 10.84 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 1291 W SOUTH 1/2/25 0.00 10.84 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 420 E MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 12.72 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 5TH/FRESNO 1/2/25 0.00 16.47 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6700 5170 420 E MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 18.58 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6080 5170 MAIN/5TH 1/2/25 0.00 25.46 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 MERCED/7TH 1/2/25 0.00 27.48 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6700 5170 420 E MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 30.88 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6260 5170 9TH/MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 69.40 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 4218 GLDNSTAT 1/2/2 0.00 90.00 12 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 2831 E MANN 1/2/25 0.00 99.73 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 GLDNST B 1/2/25 0.00 162.30 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6080 5170 128 S 5TH 1/2/25 0.00 188.04 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6080 5170 128 S 5TH 1/2/25 0.00 233.88 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6260 5170 500 E MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 443.19 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 212 E MERCED 1/2/25 0.00 527.41 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 7TH/TULARE 1/2/25 0.00 666.56 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 5TH/FRESNO 1/2/25 0.00 799.75 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 RETRO FIT LOAN 0.00 941.28 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 6200 5170 5TH/FRESNO 1/2/25 0.00 992.41 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 5,376.62
1001 44098 01/15/25 12384 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 6170 5180 LEASE 1/28-2/27 0.00 340.98 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 ENG BP24-49 0.00 95.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5510 ENG BP23-0137 0.00 95.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 SPR 23-40 0.00 109.18 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6170 5230 GIS SVCS NOV24 0.00 296.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 SUS COMM GRANT NOV2 0.00 576.70 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 TM24-31 0.00 631.80 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 PLHA GRANT NOV24 0.00 649.50 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 TM 22-0047 0.00 879.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 CUP 24-28 0.00 3,736.38 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6260 5710 DW HARRIS PARK NOV2 0.00 7,085.20 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 ON CALL PLAN FY25 0.00 25,378.15 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 100 2061 ENG/FB UNWIRED 0.00 1,199.80 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5220 VAC ROW 24-33 0.00 1,233.80 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5510 ENG BP24-171 0.00 1,235.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6200 5510 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 0.00 1,406.88 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5510 TR 6405 0.00 1,848.06 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 6150 5510 ENG CON MARSH EST I 0.00 2,001.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 48,456.45
1001 44101 01/15/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 5.41 1001 44101 01/15/25 14479 RG POWER 6260 5200 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 38.99 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 44.40
1001 44102 01/15/25 15154 SIERRA INSTALLATION 6400 5220 HOLIDAY INSTALL-REC 0.00 8,525.00 1001 44103 01/15/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 6700 5104 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 59.66 1001 44103 01/15/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 6700 5104 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 109.53 1001 44103 01/15/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 6700 5104 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 223.40 1001 44103 01/15/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 6700 5104 SUPPLIES-SN CTR 0.00 378.44 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 771.03
1001 44104 01/15/25 12791 THE MOWERS EDGE 6260 5203 SUPPLIES-PARKS 0.00 213.67 1001 44105 01/15/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6700 5185 JANITORIAL SNR CTR 0.00 72.04 1001 44105 01/15/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6700 5185 JANITORIAL-SN CTR 0.00 80.68 1001 44105 01/15/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 6200 5185 UNIFORMS-ST 0.00 86.97 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 239.69
13 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 249,392.86
TOTAL FUND 0.00 249,392.86
14 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 201 - DISTRICT SALES TAX

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44081 01/08/25 14937 FLOCK SAFETY 2010 5715 FLOCK SAFETY FALCON 0.00 15,000.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 15,000.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 15,000.00
15 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 11
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 225 - LTF - ARTICLE 8

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44052 01/08/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AM 2250 5220 SWEEP WSTE MGMT YRD 0.00 850.00 1001 44052 01/08/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AM 2250 5220 STREET SWEEP DEC24 0.00 3,500.00 1001 44052 01/08/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AM 2250 5220 LEAF SVC DEC24 0.00 6,300.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,650.00
1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 700 MERCD#A 12/26/2 0.00 698.60 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5220 ADAMS&GLDN ST12/27/ 0.00 123.75 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 GLDSTY/MANSIG12/26/ 0.00 127.12 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 MERCED/8TH 12/26/24 0.00 185.59 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 MANN&GLDST 12/22/24 0.00 15.28 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 1100 N/O MANN12/26/ 0.00 15.77 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 2250 5170 300 W MERCED 12/26/ 0.00 61.43 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,227.54
1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 2250 5710 4TH & 5TH OVERLAY 0.00 2,960.50 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 14,838.04
TOTAL FUND 0.00 14,838.04
16 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 12
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 238 - MEASURE C TOD GRANT

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 2380 5520 BIKEWAY TO TRANSIT 0.00 496.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 496.00
TOTAL FUND 0.00 496.00
17 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 13
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 255 - STATE GRANT AB178

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44042 01/02/25 13957 VALLEY SHREDDING 2550 5220 SHREDDING-SN CTR 0.00 2,449.00 1001 44082 01/08/25 14634 DEWBERRY ARCHITECT 2550 5710 PD SNIOR CT PHASE I 0.00 8,995.50 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 11,444.50
TOTAL FUND 0.00 11,444.50
18 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 14
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 256 - DWR STATE GRANT

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44030 01/02/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 2560 5710 WELL #9 0.00 8,077.00 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 2560 5710 WELL #9 PM 0.00 46.20 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 8,123.20
TOTAL FUND 0.00 8,123.20
19 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 15
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 258 - BIKE PED TRAILS SUST TRAN

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44083 01/08/25 14787 TOOLE DESIGN GROUP 258 5520 FOWLER BIKE/PED TRA 0.00 7,780.08 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 7,780.08
TOTAL FUND 0.00 7,780.08
20 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 16
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 500 - WATER

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44006 01/02/25 15150 ALANDA/MEDINA, ISAC 500 2050 UB REFUND 0.00 100.00 1001 44007 01/02/25 15151 ALL HAZARD EHS, INC 5000 5300 ASBESTOS TRAINING-W 0.00 250.00 1001 44007 01/02/25 15151 ALL HAZARD EHS, INC 5000 5300 ASBESTOS TRAINING-W 0.00 500.00 1001 44007 01/02/25 15151 ALL HAZARD EHS, INC 5000 5300 ASBESTOS TRAINING-W 0.00 750.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,500.00
1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5000 5205 SUPPLIES- PW FLEET 0.00 11.98 1001 44008 01/02/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 5000 5205 SUPPLIES-PW FLEET 0.00 147.73 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 159.71
1001 44017 01/02/25 13826 ECS IMAGING INC 5000 5220 LASERFICHE RNWL 202 0.00 681.21 1001 44021 01/02/25 15061 JB ELECTRIC 5000 5206 WELL SITE #5 0.00 225.00 1001 44021 01/02/25 15061 JB ELECTRIC 5000 5206 WELL SITE #6 0.00 225.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 450.00
1001 44022 01/02/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5000 5084 HEALTH BNFT DEC24 0.00 5,447.88 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 679 KAND 12/20/24 0.00 60.11 1001 44028 01/02/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 LANDSCAPE 12/20/24 0.00 173.06 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 233.17
1001 44033 01/02/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5000 5084 DENTAL BNFT DEC24 0.00 344.56 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 5000 5185 UNIFORMS-WATER 0.00 64.99 1001 44036 01/02/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 5000 5185 UNIFORMS-WATER 0.00 89.83 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 154.82
1001 44038 01/02/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN 5000 5084 VISION BNFT DEC24 0.00 99.06 1001 44047 01/08/25 13635 BARNES WELDING SUPP 5000 5200 SUPPLIES WATER 0.00 175.66 1001 44049 01/08/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5000 5220 WATER TEST 12/19/24 0.00 208.45 1001 44049 01/08/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5000 5220 WATER TEST 12/19/24 0.00 280.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 488.45
1001 44059 01/08/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5000 5121 WATER DEPT. SUPPLIE 0.00 219.04 1001 44059 01/08/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5000 5121 WATER DEPT. SUPPLIE 0.00 234.93 1001 44059 01/08/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5000 5121 WATER DEPT. SUPPLIE 0.00 263.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 717.49
1001 44066 01/08/25 15058 LITHIA AUTOMOTIVE G 5000 5720 2023 FORD F350 0.00 65,791.82 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 325 S 5TH 12/26/24 0.00 1,207.51 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 WELL SITE 7 12/27/2 0.00 20,702.87 1001 44067 01/08/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 WELL SITE 8 12/27/2 0.00 572.51 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 22,482.89
1001 44068 01/08/25 14314 PERSONAL CONCEPTS 5000 5150 COMPLIANCE POSTER 2 0.00 75.74 1001 44070 01/08/25 10274 SAN JOAQUIN VAL AIR 5000 5176 WELL 7 PERMIT 0.00 290.00 21 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 17
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 500 - WATER

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44075 01/08/25 13048 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OF 5000 5176 ANNUAL FEE 7/1-6/30 0.00 8,084.60 1001 44077 01/08/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 5000 5185 UNIFORMS STREETS 0.00 76.07 1001 44087 01/15/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5000 5220 WATER TEST 1/7/25 0.00 208.45 1001 44087 01/15/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5000 5220 WATER TEST 1/7/25 0.00 280.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 488.45
1001 44091 01/15/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 5000 5715 WATER MAIN 0.00 2,492.79 1001 44094 01/15/25 14238 INFOSEND, INC 5000 5621 MAINT DEC24 0.00 513.97 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 ADAMS/5TH 1/2/25 0.00 58.59 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 95 E ADAMS 1/2/25 0.00 2,071.68 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 TEMP/GOLDN 1/2/25 0.00 2,939.74 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 SESWNW231521 1/2/25 0.00 3,346.15 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 TEMP/GOLDN 1/2/25 0.00 3,915.69 1001 44097 01/15/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENT 5000 5170 TEMP/GOLDN 1/2/25 0.00 7,246.01 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 19,577.86
1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5000 5110 WATER TOWER REHAB 0.00 77.00 1001 44105 01/15/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATIO 5000 5185 UNIFORMS-WTR 0.00 86.96 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 130,590.16
TOTAL FUND 0.00 130,590.16
22 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 18
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44106 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5030 5710 TCP WELL 7 PM NOV24 0.00 390.80 1001 44106 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5030 5710 TCP WELL 7 NOV 24 0.00 2,647.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,037.80
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,037.80
TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,037.80
23 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 19
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 740 - AB1600-TRF MTGTN & IMPACT

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44100 01/15/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 740 5510 ENG SOUTH AVE 0.00 1,034.70 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,034.70
TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,034.70
24 Section 8, Item 8A.

SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 20
DATE: 01/15/2025 CITY OF FOWLER ACCTPA21
TIME: 19:55:42 CHECK REGISTER - BY FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '44006' and '44106' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/25
FUND - 750 - AB1600-PARKS

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT ACCNT ----DESCRIPTION---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 1001 44051 01/08/25 10043 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRI 7500 5710 FLAGS-PARKS 0.00 2,039.83 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 2,039.83
TOTAL FUND 0.00 2,039.83
TOTAL REPORT 0.00 443,777.17
25 Section 8, Item 8A.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 07, 2025 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625

MINUTES

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Pro-Tem Gill called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL

PRESENT
Juan Mejia (via teleconference)
Amarjeet Gill
Karnig Kazarian
Daniel Parra
ABSENT
Leonard Hammer
Staff Present: Interim City Manager Gaffery, City Attorney Cross, Fresno County Fire Protection District Battalion Chief Dominguez, City Planner Marple, Finance Director Moreno, City Engineer Park, Police Chief Reid, Public Works Director Rocha, and City Clerk Vasquez.

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Item 9B, Exhibits B and C were replaced with corrected exhibits which were presented to Council and made available to the public.

6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Two members of the public spoke.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion made by Parra, Seconded by Kazarian.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Kazarian, Parra

9. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Public Works
9A. PROVIDE STAFF DIRECTION on the Master Encroachment Agreement with unWired Broadband, LLC
A representative from unWired Broadband, LLC spoke. One member of the public spoke.

Council directed staff to terminate the agreement.
26 Section 8, Item 8B.
9B. APPROVE Resolution No. 2762 to adopt the engineer’s report and declare the City Council’s intent to order the annexation of Tract 6405 into the City’s Landscape and Storm Drainage Facilities Maintenance District No. 1
Motion made by Kazarian, Seconded by Parra.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Kazarian, Parra
Planning
9C. INTRODUCTION of Ordinance 2025-01 to amend Article 2, and to add Article 7 of Chapter 4 of Title 4 of the Fowler Municipal Code regarding semi-truck parking. Continued to January 21, 2025
Motion made by Kazarian, Seconded by Parra.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Kazarian, Parra

10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Updates were provided by Interim City Manager Gaffery, Public Works Director Rocha, Police Chief Reid, City Engineer Park, and City Clerk Vasquez.

11. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Updates were provided by Councilmember Kazarian, Councilmember Parra, Mayor Mejia, and Mayor Pro-Tem Gill.

12. CLOSED SESSION
Government Code Section 54957
Public Employee Appointment/Employment
Title: City Manager
Government Code Section 54957.6
Conference with labor negotiators
Agency designated representatives: City Attorney, City Clerk, Stephanie Dietz (Bob Murray & Associates)
Unrepresented employee: City Manager
The meeting went into closed session at 6:55 p.m.

13. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION
No reportable action was taken on either of the two closed session items.

14. ADJOURN
Having no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:44 p.m. 27 Section 8, Item 8B.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2025
FROM: DAWN E. MARPLE, City Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVE Resolution No. 2763, Adopting the Fowler Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommend the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2763, adopting the City of Fowler Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. The Planning Commission recommended approval at its January 9, 2025 special meeting.

BACKGROUND
Historically, the City of Fowler has required development proponents who submit projects that would generate over 100 peak hour trips to submit a traffic impact analysis (“TIA”). The TIA would be used by the City to determine whether existing street intersections or segments would need to be improved with traffic controls to keep traffic consistent with the delay standards identified in the City’s General Plan. This has never been a formally adopted policy, however the imposition of such a requirement is consistent with the requirements of other jurisdictions in the area.

Adopting the City of Fowler TIA Guidelines (“Guidelines”) would ensure that these analyses of traffic impacts are developed consistently and with less subjectivity. Establishing these standards would remove the uncertainty in the time and cost of preparing and reviewing the analyses of traffic impacts.

The proposed Guidelines also seek to modify the existing threshold of significance adopted by the City in 2021 with regards to Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”). Currently, the City formally uses the VMT maps prepared by Fresno COG to determine whether or not a project’s impact would be less than significant, or require varying amounts of mitigation. With adoption of the 2040 Fowler General Plan however, the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) found that VMT would result in a less than significant impact, so long as development is consistent with the assumptions of the City’s General Plan. City staff would like to formalize this standard in the Guidelines.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.
28 Section 8, Item 8C.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A “project” for purposes of CEQA is defined as an action that has the “potential for resulting in a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378, subd. (a).) Adoption of the Guidelines does not approve or endorse any physical activity by the City or by any other entity; does not enact or amend a zoning ordinance or a general plan or any element thereof; does not result in support to any entity via contract, grant, subsidy, loan, or other form of assistance; and does not result in issuance to any entity of any lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use. (Id.) Furthermore, there are no indirect physical changes in the environment that are reasonably foreseeable from the adoption of the Guidelines. Accordingly, adoption of the Guidelines does not qualify as a “project” for purposes of CEQA review, and is exempt pursuant to the “common sense” exemption. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15061, subd. (b)(3).)

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Fowler Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines were prepared to be consistent with the following action item and policy of the General Plan:

General Plan Action Item MOB-4a
Prepare guidelines for the evaluation of vehicle miles traveled. The guidelines should include significance criteria for evaluating impacts, thresholds of applicability for discretionary projects, and guidance on analyzing transportation impacts.

General Plan Policy MOB-5
Encourage a Level of Service (LOS) "C" throughout the local circulation network. LOS “D” may be allowed during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at State Route 99 interchanges, and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible. LOS “D” may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity.

LOS “E” may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized.

FISCAL IMPACT
City Council’s approval would have no fiscal impact. The guidelines would be implemented through requirements imposed on development applicants. Review of traffic impact analyses would be conducted by the City Engineer through existing contracts and funded through development application fees.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
No procurement is associated with this action.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Resolution No. 2763, Exhibit A
29 Section 8, Item 8C.

RESOLUTION NO. 2763

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF

FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FOWLER TRAFFIC IMPACT

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2013, the Governor of the State of California signed Senate Bill 743, which included the addition of section 21099 to the Public Resources Code, calling for the development and adoption of criteria for determining the significance of traffic impacts and consideration of vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) as the metric; and WHEREAS, on December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law issued a Notice of Approval of Regulatory Action, approving the California Natural Resources Agency’s amendments and updates to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines (2018 CEQA Amendments); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(4) authorizes a lead agency to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project’s VMT impacts and section 15064.3, subdivision (c) states that the provisions of section 15064.3 shall apply statewide as of July 1, 2020; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, section XVII pertaining to transportation impacts requires the lead agency to determine if a project would have a significant impact with respect to VMT; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7, subdivision (a) defines a threshold of significance as “an identifiable quantitative, qualitative, or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant”; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7, subdivision (b) states that “[t]hresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and supported by substantial evidence;” and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate orderly development within the City of Fowler and implement a threshold of significance that is relevant to the City’s development patterns and established based upon data unique to the region, and in order to ensure consistency in significance determinations for projects within the City, the City has elected to adopt a citywide threshold of significance to measure VMT, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Guidelines”); and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2040 General Plan, which found that implementation of the General Plan would result in a less than significant impact to VMT; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Guidelines were developed through a public review process as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7, subdivision (b); and 30 Section 8, Item 8C.

WHEREAS, the proposed Guidelines were drafted to comply with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines sections 15064.3 and 15064.7 including the identification of substantial evidence supporting the proposed VMT thresholds; and
WHEREAS, substantial evidence has been provided to support adoption of such thresholds; and
WHEREAS, the Guidelines would allow the City to implement General Plan Policy MOB5, which encourages a Level of Service of “C” to “E”, depending on the hour, street type and the potential for pedestrian and bicyclist activity; and
WHEREAS, the Fowler Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt the Guidelines at its January 9, 2025 special meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Fowler City Council has reviewed the Guidelines and determined that, in consideration of the conditions existing within the City, the thresholds established in the Guidelines and the bases upon which they were determined are appropriate for use by the City; and
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2025, the Fowler City Council was presented with the Guidelines, held a public meeting to consider the Guidelines, and received both oral testimony and written information regarding the Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis outlined in the staff report and elsewhere in the Administrative Record which determined that adoption of the proposed Guidelines does not meet the definition of a “project” for purposes of environmental review under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has had an opportunity to review and consider the entire administrative record relating to the Guidelines, which is on file with the City’s Planning Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the administrative record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing, which are incorporated herein by this reference (“Administrative Record”).

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler, based upon the entire Administrative Record of the proceedings, hereby resolves and finds as follows:

1. Adoption of the Guidelines does not qualify as “project” for purposes of environmental review under CEQA and is therefore exempt pursuant to the “common sense” exemption under CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3).

2. The Guidelines were prepared consistent with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines sections 15064.3 and 15064.7, and the Guidelines contain substantial evidence necessary to support adoption of the thresholds of significance for vehicle miles traveled for general use as part of the City’s environmental review process for the purpose of assessing the transportation impacts for projects within the City of Fowler’s jurisdiction.

3. Adoption of the Guidelines is in the best interest of the City of Fowler. 31 Section 8, Item 8C.

4. The City Council hereby adopts the Fowler Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January 2025, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
32 Section 8, Item 8C.

CITY OF FOWLER

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

GUIDELINES
JANUARY 2025
PREPARED BY:

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
400 E. MAIN ST, STE 300, VISALIA, CALIFORNIA 93291
33 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page | ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction 1-1

1.1 Overview of Guidelines ............................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Transportation Impact Requirements......................................................................................1-1

1.2.1 SB 743 Requirements...................................................................................................1-1

1.2.2 Local Requirements .....................................................................................................1-2

1.3 Transportation Impact Analysis Report ....................................................................................1-2

1.3.1 CEQA Analysis ..............................................................................................................1-2

1.3.2 Traffic Impact Study (TIS).............................................................................................1-2 2 CEQA Analysis Requirements 2-1

2.1 Land Use Projects.....................................................................................................................2-1

2.1.1 Project Screening .........................................................................................................2-1

2.1.2 Thresholds of Significance............................................................................................2-3

2.1.3 Methodology ...............................................................................................................2-4

2.1.4 Redevelopment Projects..............................................................................................2-5

2.1.5 Land Use Plans.............................................................................................................2-5

2.1.6 Cumulative Impacts .....................................................................................................2-5

2.1.7 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................2-6

2.2 Transporation Infrastructure Projects......................................................................................2-7

2.2.1 Threshold for Detailed VMT Analysis...........................................................................2-7

2.2.2 Thresholds of significance............................................................................................2-8

2.2.3 Methodology and Tools...............................................................................................2-8

2.2.4 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................2-8 3 Traffic Impact Study 3-8

3.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................3-8

3.1.1 TIS Preparation Threshold............................................................................................3-9

3.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................................3-9

3.2.1 Coordination with Caltrans........................................................................................3-10

3.2.2 Coordination with Other Agencies (County of Fresno and/or City of Selma).............3-10

3.3 Levels of Service .....................................................................................................................3-10

3.3.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................3-10

3.4 Traffic Analysis Scenarios .......................................................................................................3-12

3.4.1 Future-Year Traffic Volumes......................................................................................3-12

3.5 Traffic Counts.........................................................................................................................3-13

3.6 Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................3-13

3.7 Trip Distribution .....................................................................................................................3-14

3.8 Approved and Pending Projects.............................................................................................3-14

3.9 Site Access and Circulation.....................................................................................................3-15

3.10 Queueing at Study Intersections............................................................................................3-15

3.11 Traffic Operations Thresholds................................................................................................3-15

3.12 FAIR-SHARE CONTRIBUTION...................................................................................................3-16

3.13 Analysis Discussion .................................................................................................................3-16 34 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page | iii

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Low VMT Areas .................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix B: TIS Report Format ................................................................................................................ 1 35 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page | iv

ABBREVIATIONS
ADT....................................................................................................................................Average Daily Trips Caltrans ...........................................................................................California Department of Transportation CEQA ..................................................................................................... California Environmental Quality Act City ............................................................................................................................................ City of Fowler EIR ....................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Report FAR ........................................................................................................................................ Floor Area Ratio Fresno COG ...................................................................................................Fresno Council of Governments GHG.......................................................................................................................................Greenhouse Gas HCM .......................................................................................................................Highway Capacity Manual HCS .......................................................................................................................Highway Capacity Software HQTA ....................................................................................................................... High Quality Transit Area LOS ......................................................................................................................................... Level of Service MRTD..........................................................................................................Minimum Required Throat Depth MUTCD........................................................................................Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices OPR.............................................................................................Governor’s Office of Planning and Research RTP ....................................................................................................................Regional Transportation Plan SB ....................................................................................................................................................Senate Bill SCS.............................................................................................................Sustainable Communities Strategy SOV............................................................................................................................Single Occupant Vehicle TAZ ....................................................................................................................Transportation Analysis Zone TDM.................................................................................................... Transportation Demand Management TIA ............................................................................................................................... Traffic Impact Analysis TIS.................................................................................................................................... Traffic Impact Study VMT............................................................................................................................. Vehicle Miles Traveled 36 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 1 ends

1 INTRODUCTION
The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines document provides guidance to City of Fowler (City) staff, applicants, and consultants on the requirements to evaluate transportation impacts for projects in the City for the purpose of determining impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The guidelines are intended to:
• promote conformance with applicable City and State regulations; • provide evaluation consistent with CEQA;
• ensure consistency in preparation of studies by applicants and consultants; and • provide predictability in content for City staff and the public in reviewing studies.

While intended to be comprehensive, not all aspects of every transportation analysis can be addressed within this framework. City staff reserve the right to use judgement to request exemptions and/or to modify requirements for specific projects at the time of the review application.

1.1 OVERVIEW OF GUIDELINES
Section 1: Introduction summarizes the requirements for transportation analysis.

Section 2: CEQA Analysis Requirements describes the analysis to meet State of California guidelines, in particular analysis of vehicle-miles of travel (VMT).

Section 3: Traffic Impact Study lists the requirements for transportation evaluation relative to City of Fowler policies.

Section 4: Level of Environmental Review summarizes the environmental documentation that may be appropriate for various types of projects.

1.2 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT REQUIREMENTS
The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines specifically address the requirements of California Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) which mandates specific types of CEQA analysis of transportation projects, effective July 1, 2020.

1.2.1 SB 743 REQUIREMENTS
Prior to implementation of SB 743, CEQA transportation analyses of individual projects typically determined impacts on the circulation system in terms of roadway delay (i.e., congestion) and/or capacity usage at specific locations, such as street intersections or freeway segments. Senate Bill 743, signed into law in September 2013, requires changes to the guidelines for CEQA transportation analysis. The changes include the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining transportation impacts. An unintended side effect of LOS was, as the transportation infrastructure became saturated with traffic, especially in built-up areas, the ability to mitigate congestion impacts became infeasible, and therefore an EIR would be required for projects in such areas. The purpose of SB 743, consequently, is to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

Under SB 743, a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact under CEQA. Therefore, LOS and other similar vehicle delay or capacity metrics may no longer serve as transportation impact metrics for CEQA analysis. The California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) updated the CEQA Guidelines and provided a technical advisory (December 2018), which recommends vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts under CEQA. The California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the CEQA Guidelines including the Guidelines section implementing SB 743. The changes have been approved by the Office of the Administrative Law and took effect on July 1, 2020.
37 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 1 ends

1.2.2 LOCAL REQUIREMENTS
Revisions to CEQA transportation analysis requirements do not preclude the application of local general plan policies, municipal and zoning codes, conditions of approval, or any other planning requirements through the City’s planning approval processes to ensure adequate operation of the transportation system in terms of transportation congestion measures related to vehicular delay and roadway capacity. As such, the City continues to apply congestion-related transportation impact analysis and conditions or requirements for land development projects through planning approval processes outside of the CEQA Guidelines in order to continue implementing General Plan policies. The City’s adopted 2023 General Plan Circulation Element includes LOS standards. In order to ensure that a project is consistent with the General Plan policy, a LOS analysis may be required at the request of the City Engineer to determine necessary roadway infrastructure improvements and capacity. Any improvements necessary to ensure LOS standards are met may be required as part of the project entitlement. These requirements are discussed in Section 3, Traffic Impact Study.

1.3 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
This document provides guidance for the two types of analysis that normally comprise a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) report:

1. CEQA Analysis

2. Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
Not all projects will require all components of a CEQA analysis and a TIS. For example, a project could meet the screening criteria for being located in a high-quality transit area and be exempt from the preparation of a detailed CEQA VMT analysis. Such a project may only be required to provide a TIS. Conversely, a project may require a VMT analysis, but not necessarily require a TIS. Thus, the final scope of the Transportation Impact Analysis would need to be determined by the City.

1.3.1 CEQA ANALYSIS
A CEQA analysis of transportation impacts consists of evaluation measures including conflicts with circulation policies, VMT, hazards, and emergency access. The quantitative methodology, significance thresholds, and mitigation measures for conducting the transportation analysis in accordance with the requirements of SB 743 are primarily based on VMT metrics. The CEQA analysis is part of the environmental review process and must meet CEQA requirements.

1.3.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS)
The City can require that local non-CEQA analysis address traffic operations, safety issues and needed project design features related to a proposed land use project, as well as analyze site access and internal circulation. The TIS may be used to assess transportation impacts in relation to the City’s policies in the General Plan and other planning documents.
38 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

2 CEQA ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
This section discusses the requirements for conducting analyses for projects under environmental review, consistent with requirements from SB 743. Under CEQA, a lead agency has the authority to determine its own significance thresholds and methodologies for technical analysis, taking into account its own development patterns, policy goals and context. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.7, subd. (b).) Lead agencies can make their own specific decisions regarding methodology and thresholds, presuming their choices are supported by substantial evidence.

The CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form identifies the following four impact types for transportation:
a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric feature or incompatible uses? d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, the City of Fowler has adopted thresholds of significance to determine when a project will have a significant transportation impact based on VMT. The City has developed screening criteria to streamline the analysis for projects that meet certain criteria, referred to as Project Screening, as further described below in Section 2.1.1.

2.1 LAND USE PROJECTS
This section provides information for analyzing individual land use projects, including the process to aid in deciding if a detailed VMT analysis is needed for a land use project.

2.1.1 PROJECT SCREENING
A project will require a detailed VMT analysis unless it meets at least one of the City’s five screening criteria:

1. Consistent with the General Plan

2. Small projects

3. Provision of affordable housing

4. Local-serving retail

5. Project located in a High-Quality Transit Area (HQTA)

6. Project located in low VMT area

2.1.1.1 RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE PROJECTS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The City conducted a VMT analysis of the General Plan at a 2042 horizon date and found that Citywide residential and office (or employment-generating) VMT impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, these projects that develop consistent with these General Plan assumptions would have a less than significant impact.

2.1.1.2 SMALL PROJECTS
The Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines prepared by the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) found that projects that generate or attract fewer than 500 average daily (Weekday, Saturday, and Sunday) vehicle trips are presumed to cause a less-than-significant VMT impact.

2.1.1.3 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Affordable housing is designated as housing for sale or for rent below market rate. Residential projects in high quality transit areas with a high proportion of affordable housing are presumed to have a less-than39 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

significant transportation impact. Projects can only be screened out if they are located in an area supported by a quality walking and biking network with nearby retail and employment opportunities. If a project contains less than 100 percent affordable housing, the portion that is affordable should be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis.

2.1.1.4 LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL
Projects that are local-serving retail with 50,000 square feet gross floor area or less are presumed to have a less-than-significant impact. This applies to the entirety of a retail project; for a mixed-use project, this screening criteria should be applied to the retail/commercial component separately to determine if that portion of the project screens out of a detailed VMT analysis.

The determination of local-serving retail is based on location, the characteristics of the project and the vicinity of the site, as well as the envisioned goods and services the retail development would provide.

Generally, local-serving retail primarily provides goods and services that most people need on a regular basis and be located close to where people live. Groceries, medicines, fast food and casual restaurants, fitness and beauty services are typical goods and services provided by local-serving retail centers.

The City may require a project applicant to provide a market analysis to demonstrate that the project meets the characteristics of a local-serving retail development based on the goods and services provided relative to the geographic location, the customer base, and other nearby retail uses.

2.1.1.5 PUBLIC SERVICES
Public services (e.g., police, fire stations, public utilities, neighborhood parks1) do not generally generate substantial amounts of trips and VMT. Instead, these land uses are often built to support other nearby land uses (e.g., office and residential). Therefore, these land uses can be presumed to have less than significant impacts on VMT. However, this presumption would not apply if the project is proposed to be sited in a location that requires employees or visitors to travel substantial distances and may require a detailed VMT analysis.

2.1.1.6 LOW VMT AREAS
Residential and employment projects that are proposed in areas that generate VMT below adopted City thresholds are presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact and thus can be screened out. The City provides screening maps based on transportation analysis zones (TAZs) and results from the travel model maintained by the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG). The following types of projects may be screened out of detailed VMT analysis using these criteria:
• Residential projects proposed in TAZs with total daily resident-based VMT per capita that is thirteen percent (13%) less than the existing average baseline level for Fresno County. • Office or the employment portions of other non-residential uses with total daily employee-based VMT per employee that is thirteen percent (13%) less than the existing average baseline level for Fresno County.

The TAZs that fall into these categories are shown in green in the maps provided in Appendix A. This exhibit will be updated on an ongoing basis. Contact the City Engineer for the up-to-date version.

2.1.1.7 HIGH-QUALITY TRANSIT AREA
Projects that are located in a high-quality transit area (HQTA) would not require a detailed VMT analysis.

However, this presumption does not apply if the project:
1 For the purpose of conducting VMT analyses, neighborhood parks are defined as typically including playground equipment, playfields, and picnic facilities; ranging in size of up to 30 acres; and serving as social and recreational focal points for neighborhoods.
40 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

• has a floor area ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;
• includes substantially more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the Zoning Ordinance such that it discourages use of alternative modes (transit, biking, walking) by promoting auto ownership and making driving very convenient; • is inconsistent with the applicable Fresno COG Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), as determined by the City; or
• replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

As of December 2024, there are no HQTAs in the City of Fowler Sphere of Influence.

2.1.1.8 INCONSISTENCY WITH RTP/SCS
If a proposed project is inconsistent with the adopted Fresno COG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), the City will evaluate whether that inconsistency may result in a significant impact on transportation. Therefore, projects that are inconsistent with the RTP/SCS would not qualify for screening out of a detailed VMT analysis.

2.1.2 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
For projects which do not meet any of the screening criteria, the City of Fowler has adopted VMT thresholds for land use development based on a review of long-range plans and policies for the City and for the metropolitan planning organization for the region, Fresno COG. Fresno COG has set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by thirteen percent (13%) per capita by 2035 as a target for the Fresno region.2 The intent of SB 743 is to bring CEQA transportation analyses into closer alignment with other statewide policies regarding GHG, complete streets, and smart growth. Therefore, using a threshold of thirteen percent (13%) below average VMT for residential and office projects is consistent with established regional GHG emission goals.

The OPR technical advisory recommends comparing a project’s estimated VMT per capita or VMT per employee to average values on a regional or citywide basis. For retail projects, total VMT within the area affected by the project is measured.

The significance thresholds and specific VMT metrics used to indicate a significant transportation impact are described below:
• Residential Land Uses
o A proposed project exceeding a level of thirteen percent (13%) below existing average VMT per capita in Fresno County.
o Regional Average: 16.1 VMT/capita
o Impact Threshold: 14.0 VMT/capita
• Office Land Uses
o A proposed project exceeding a level of thirteen percent (13%) below existing average VMT per employee in Fresno County.
o Regional Average: 25.6 VMT/employee
o Impact Threshold: 22.3 VMT/employee
• Retail Land Uses
o A net increase in total VMT. The total VMT for the region without and with the project is calculated. The difference between the two scenarios is the net change in total VMT that is attributable to the project.
2 SB 375 Greenhouse Emission Reduction Target for the Fresno County Region, Fresno Council of Governments, April 25, 2017.
41 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

• Other Land Uses
o The City will make a determination of the applicable thresholds on a case-by-case basis based on the land use type, project description, and setting. Research and development, medical offices, assisted living, and industrial projects may be evaluated similar to office projects using the VMT per employee metric. Projects such as religious institutions, regional parks, hotels, private schools and medical offices may be evaluated using the net VMT criteria similar to retail projects.
o Generally, projects that generate more employee traffic than customer traffic would be treated as an office land use, whereas the inverse would be treated as a retail use. • Mixed-Use Projects
o Evaluate each component of a mixed-use project independently and apply the significance threshold for each land use type. Alternatively, the evaluation would apply only to the project’s dominant use.
• Residential and Office Uses Consistent with the General Plan o The Program Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 2040 General Plan indicated that Citywide VMT would not result in a significant impact. Therefore, residential and office (or employment-generating) uses that develop consistent with the development assumptions of the General Plan would result in a less than significant impact.

2.1.3 METHODOLOGY
Projects that do not meet the screening criteria must include a detailed evaluation of the VMT generated by the project.

2.1.3.1 REGIONAL AVERAGE VMT
Regional average VMT per capita and VMT per employee values are determined using the Fresno COG travel model. The travel model is a set of mathematical procedures and equations that represent the variety of transportation choices that people make, and how those choices result in trips on the transportation network. The Fresno COG travel model is an activity-based model that simulates the County’s population, based on detailed Census data, and models the daily activity patterns of each simulated individual along with resulting travel demand. The OPR guidelines recommend using an activity or tour-based approach for VMT whenever possible.

The daily activity patterns in the travel model are based on a statistical analysis of a household travel survey, where a representative sample of households were asked to track all daily activities and trips by all members of their household. A simulated travel tour might consist of, for example, travel from the home to the gym to work to supermarket to home in a typical weekday. The travel model was calibrated to these surveyed travel patterns, and also validated by its ability to replicate counted traffic volumes, transit ridership, and total Fresno County VMT from the Highway Performance Measurement System (HPMS) which is based on traffic counts.

The VMT per capita includes all trips made by residents, including their trips while away from home, but does not include trips visiting residences (e.g., trips made by delivery vans). The regional average VMT per capita is calculated by summing the vehicle mileage (excluding trips made by transit, bicycle or walking) for all trips made by Fresno County residents, and dividing by the county population.

The VMT per employee includes trips made by employees to and from their workplaces, including trips to and from points other than the employees’ homes, but does not include visitors to the employment sites.

The regional average VMT per employee is calculated by summing the vehicle mileage (excluding trips made by transit, bicycle or walking) for all trips made by Fresno County employees, and dividing by the total number of employees in the county.
42 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

2.1.3.2 VMT PER CAPITA/EMPLOYEE
For residential or employment land uses where VMT per capita or VMT per employee are used to determine impacts, the following analysis methods are available:
• The VMT per capita or VMT per employee may be looked up using the latest screening maps (Appendix A) and the TAZ (or TAZs) containing the project site. • If the value for the TAZ is zero or significantly different compared to the values in surrounding TAZs due to a lack of land use data in the existing condition for the project TAZ, the City may allow the VMT per capita or VMT per employee to be based on an average of surrounding adjacent TAZs. • If a proposed project affects the balance of residential and non-residential land uses in an area and is a relatively large project, it is recommended that the Fresno COG model be rerun to include the proposed project, and that the VMT per capita and VMT per employee be recalculated.

2.1.3.3 TRUCK VMT
SB 743 does not apply to goods movement (i.e., trucks). Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines states that VMT for transportation impacts refers to “… the amount and distance of automobile travel…”. Therefore, the VMT associated with trucks and the movement of goods is not required to be analyzed and mitigated for the evaluation of transportation impacts under CEQA. Projects that generate a substantial amount of truck traffic also generate automobile trips, and project-related automobile trips would be subject to VMT analysis and mitigation. The VMT for all vehicles, including heavy trucks related to a project, will still be calculated as input for air quality, GHG, noise and energy impact analyses to be evaluated in nontransportation parts of the environmental analysis. The TIS requires an evaluation of truck traffic in terms of roadway and intersection operations, as discussed in Section 3.

2.1.4 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
If a redevelopment project replaces active land uses and results in a net decrease in overall VMT, it may be presumed that the project would result in a less-than-significant impact.

If a project replaces existing active uses and leads to a net overall increase in VMT compared to the previous uses, then the thresholds for the new land uses should apply. If net VMT increases, then the appropriate VMT metrics and thresholds should be applied. For example, if a residential project replaces an office use resulting in a net increase in VMT, then the project’s VMT per capita should be compared with the thresholds for residential projects. If the project is a mixed-use project, then the recommended approach for analyzing mixed-use projects should be applied to analyze each individual use.

2.1.5 LAND USE PLANS
For land use plans such as specific plans, community plans, and general plan updates, consistent with OPR’s recommendations, the City requires comparing the applicable VMT thresholds (such as VMT per capita and/or VMT per employee) described in Section 2.1.3 under existing conditions with the applicable VMT metrics for the expected horizon year for the land use plan. If there is a net increase in the applicable VMT metrics under horizon year conditions, then the project will have a significant impact.

2.1.6 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
State CEQA Guidelines section 15064(h)(1) reads, “when assessing whether a cumulative effect requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the lead agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable.” Generally, an analysis of cumulative impacts falls under two categories, and are described below:

1. VMT per capita or per employee

2. Total VMT
43 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

2.1.6.1 VMT PER CAPITA/EMPLOYEE
For land uses evaluated under an efficiency metric (VMT per capita for residential or VMT per employee for office/employment), if a project falls below the threshold, it would also result in less-than-significant cumulative impacts. In other words, a project that falls below an efficiency-based threshold would have no cumulative impact distinct from the project impact.

2.1.6.2 TOTAL VMT
For land uses evaluated using total VMT (e.g., retail, hotels, etc.), when absolute VMT metrics (such as total VMT recommended for retail and transportation projects) are used, a cumulative VMT impact analysis may be appropriate. Projects must demonstrate consistency with the General Plan to address cumulative impacts. A determination for consistency with the General Plan or RTP/SCS would be made by the City Engineer and based on factors such as density, design and consistency with the City’s General Plan goals and policies. Inconsistencies may be identified if the proposed land use quantities are beyond the designation for the project site in the General Plan or RTP/SCS, in which case the project may result in higher VMT compared to the applicable plan.

If a project is consistent with the General Plan or RTP/SCS, it will be considered as part of the cumulative condition to meet the General Plan’s long-range transportation goals, and therefore will result in a lessthan-significant cumulative impact. If a project is not consistent with the General Plan, a cumulative impact analysis will be required to determine if the project would result in a net increase in VMT.

2.1.7 MITIGATION
If a project would result in significant impacts, CEQA requires feasible mitigation measures to be implemented to reduce or mitigate an impact. Mitigation, according to CEQA Guidelines section 15370, includes:
(a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action (b) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation (c) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment (d) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action
(e) Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments, including through permanent protection of such resources in the form of conservation easements For VMT impacts, a combination of measures from several VMT reduction strategies may be implemented:
project characteristics, multimodal improvements, parking, and Transportation Demand Management (TDM). VMT is reduced by implementing strategies that reduce the number of automobile trips generated by the project, shift more trips from automobile to non-automobile modes, and/or reduce the distances that people drive. Generally, these reductions can best be achieved by the implementation of TDM strategies.

TDM strategies are designed to change travel behavior in order to reduce the demand for vehicle travel and increase the overall efficiency of a local or regional transportation system. This is accomplished by encouraging mode shifts away from the Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) and auto trips away from peak periods. TDM strategies typically involve some form of incentives for employers and residents in order to reduce driving and encourage transit, walking, biking, and carpooling. These incentives can include, but are not limited to, supplying transit passes, rideshare programs, parking cash out, and guaranteed ride home programs. The implementation of TDM measures outcomes include increased transit use and nonmotorized travel, reduced VMT, reduced roadway congestion, and reduced parking demand. 44 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 2 ends

Measures to reduce VMT have been documented by several sources. Sources most commonly referenced include the California Air Resources Board (CARB) list of transportation and land use strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions;3the California Pollution Control Offices Association (CAPCOA) report on quantifying greenhouse gas mitigation measures;4and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Mobility Management VMT Reduction Calculator Tool – Design Document5. The City recommends the use of these sources to select and apply mitigation measures and appropriate VMT reductions. The project applicant will be required to provide evidence for identifying specific values for mitigations to demonstrate the quantification in reduction of VMT to a level that would be less than significant.

Projects for which impacts are determined to be significant are required to propose a list of VMT reduction measures and document the associated percentage of VMT reduction supported by substantial evidence.

Project VMT is calculated by applying the percentage in reduction. Project VMT is then compared to the threshold of significance to evaluate the project’s CEQA transportation impact. The City will review and approve the proposed mitigation and the calculated percentage in VMT reduction.

VMT mitigation fees, mitigation banks, and mitigation exchange programs are potential future methods for handling mitigation. Cities have been exploring the establishment of programs such as mitigation banking and VMT exchanges. VMT exchange banks allow program-level mitigation to take place for projects located in high-VMT areas where mitigation at the project level alone may not be effective. A considerable amount of effort is needed to set up these types of fee programs, which are implemented in advance and independent of the environmental review for a specific land development project. As a first step, the City will need to identify mitigation strategies that are feasible for the City or individual projects to implement.

This can include determining the physical feasibility of infrastructure projects or determining the implementation feasibility of programs that would contribute to development of regional pedestrian, bicycle/scooter, and transit projects and possibly TDM actions aimed at changing travel behavior.

2.2 TRANSPORATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
This section provides information for analyzing transportation projects on roads within the City’s jurisdiction.

2.2.1 THRESHOLD FOR DETAILED VMT ANALYSIS
The City requires an analysis of transportation projects if they are expected to increase VMT, primarily projects that encourage the use of single-occupancy automobile such as the addition of through travel lanes. However, transportation projects that have already been specifically analyzed in a citywide plan (such as a General Plan update) may be exempt from a detailed VMT analysis. This exemption may be granted if the necessary VMT analysis and potential mitigations have already been calculated and identified at the plan level. Conversely, projects that would likely not lead to an increase in vehicle travel and which promote use of transit and active transportation, should not require a VMT analysis. Project types that would likely not lead to a substantial or measurable increase in vehicle travel and generally should not require a VMT analysis include:
• road rehabilitation
• safety projects
• auxiliary lanes less than one (1) mile in length
3 https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/policies/policies.htm 4 California Pollution Control Officers Association, Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, 2021. 5 https://www.icommutesd.com/docs/default-source/planning/vmt-reduction-calculatortool_final.xlsx?sfvrsn=4b21b67b_4 45 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

• turning lanes
• conversion to managed or transit lanes
• road diets
• removal or relocation of parking spaces
• addition of non-motorized, transit, and active transportation facilities This approach is consistent with the intent of SB 743 in that it streamlines VMT-reducing projects and thoroughly assesses and mitigates, as appropriate, projects that have the potential to increase VMT.

2.2.2 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Transportation projects that have already been included and evaluated in the General Plan or the RTP/SCS are presumed to have a less than significant impact.

For projects that have not been included in the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or are modifications and replacements, any growth in VMT attributable to the transportation project could result in a significant impact. For example, a transportation project that replaces a project included in the General Plan and would generate less VMT compared to the project included in the General Plan would have a less than significant impact. Projects not included in the General Plan or RTP/SCS would have a significant impact if they cause a net increase in VMT.

2.2.3 METHODOLOGY AND TOOLS
For transportation projects (e.g., those that increase vehicular throughput or are not included in a citywide plan) that require a detailed VMT analysis, the City should require analysis using the most current travel demand model (i.e., Fresno COG model) to estimate changes to citywide VMT due to rerouted trips. To capture long-term effects, an induced demand assessment using the following formula should be required:
[% 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑠] × [𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑉𝑀𝑇] × [𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦] = [𝑉𝑀𝑇 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡] The City requires total VMT in the city as the appropriate VMT metric, with the impact threshold being any increase in total VMT. The analysis shall be performed for the long-range horizon year, normally 20 years from project completion. This approach would discourage induced demand impacts by requiring that a baseline level of VMT in the city not be exceeded.

2.2.4 MITIGATION
Mitigation measures for transportation projects generally seek to reduce VMT by discouraging singlepassenger automobile travel or through the funding of TDM measures. The following potential mitigation measures for transportation projects are listed as examples for consideration:
• Tolling new lanes to encourage carpooling and fund transit improvements • Converting existing general-purpose lanes to HOV or HOT lanes • Implementing or funding off-site travel demand management • Implementing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) strategies to improve passenger throughput on existing lanes
The City may pursue other mitigation measures supported by substantial evidence. 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

3.1 PURPOSE
A traffic impact study (TIS) may be required for land use projects, in addition to the CEQA analysis, to evaluate the effects of a development project on the circulation network, primarily on local access and 46 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

circulation in the proximity of a project site. The TIS ensures that the project provides safe connections for cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. This analysis is required to address operational and safety potential issues for all transportation modes, and to identify improvements needed with project implementation and consistent with City policies.

These guidelines are provided to establish general procedures and requirements for the preparation of TISs associated with development within the city of Fowler. The City recognizes that every development project and analysis context is unique. Therefore, emphasis is placed on the term “guidelines,” and not every aspect of the guideline is necessarily applicable to all projects. These guidelines are intended as a checklist for analysis preparers to ensure common analysis items are not overlooked. They are not intended to be prescriptive to the point of eliminating professional judgment.

3.1.1 TIS PREPARATION THRESHOLD
Unless waived by the City Engineer, a TIS will be required by the City to adequately assess the impacts of development projects on the existing and/or planned street system when any of the following thresholds are met:

1. Traffic generated by the project is expected to be greater than 100 vehicle trips during any peak hour.

2. The project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) which changes the use to a designation that has a potential to generate a higher number of vehicle trips than the existing, or originally planned land use designation.

3. Traffic generated by the project will substantially affect an intersection or roadway segment already identified as operating at an unacceptable level of service.

4. The project will substantially change the offsite transportation system or connection to it, as determined by the City Engineer.

A TIS requires updating when three or more years with no activity have passed since the preparation of the analysis. After three years with no activity, a TIS is considered antiquated and irrelevant. An exception is made for tentative maps, where the TIS shall expire with the expiration of the tentative map. For cases in which a master TIS was prepared for a large development, the specific phases will generally not require supplemental analyses if the master TIS analyzed the large development in phases and the specific phases are consistent with the master TIS.

3.2 STUDY AREA
The intersections and roadway segments to be covered by the TIS will be determined on a case-by-case basis and shall be sufficient in size to include existing and planned streets and intersections that may be impacted by the proposed development. The scope of the TIS, including the study area, proposed trip distribution, and trip generation, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or their designee prior to preparation of the study.

The following guidelines determine the extents of the study area for a TIS:
• Pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities within a half-mile distance from the project site boundary • All intersections of major streets that would provide direct access to the project • All signalized intersections within one-half mile of the project site boundary where the project would add 50 or more peak hour trips, and signalized intersections beyond one-half mile where the project would add 100 or more peak hour trips
• All unsignalized intersections within one-half mile of the project site boundary where the project would add more than 50 peak hour trips
47 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

Local transportation analyses shall provide sufficient detail regarding existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. This could include identification of deficient facilities, existing and planned bicycle facilities, and existing and planned transit routes and facilities.

3.2.1 COORDINATION WITH CALTRANS
The TIS and/or City staff shall consult with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to determine traffic impacts on Caltrans’ State facilities, when such projects are within one half-mile of or when they are anticipated to put significant demand on such facilities. This consultation should include a request to Caltrans for their concurrence with the scope of analysis for Caltrans’ State facilities, or a recommendation from Caltrans for specific modifications to the scope. This analysis must follow the most current Caltrans guidance to analyze transportation impacts from development projects on the State highway system. The consultation should also include a review of recommendations to reduce any impacts to Caltrans’ State facilities.

3.2.2 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES (COUNTY OF FRESNO AND/OR CITY OF SELMA)
The TIS preparer and/or City staff shall consult with the County of Fresno and/or City of Selma to determine the levels of significance with regard to traffic impacts on County or Selma roadway facilities, when such projects are within one half-mile of or when they are anticipated to put significant demand on such facilities. Correspondence with the neighboring agencies shall be provided to the City Engineering Department.

If a consultant is performing work in an adjacent agency and is analyzing circulation and transportation facilities and infrastructure within one mile of the City of Fowler sphere of influence, the City of Fowler City Engineer should be contacted for review of the scope of work, as well as receive a completed document for comment.

3.3 LEVELS OF SERVICE
According to General Plan Policy MOB-5, all city intersections and roadway segments are encouraged to operate at a LOS of C or better. LOS D may be allowed during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at State Route 99 interchanges, and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible.

LOS D may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity. LOS E may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized.

3.3.1 METHODOLOGY
The LOS shall be based on average delay for signalized and unsignalized intersections and service volume tables (such as those prepared by the Florida Department of Transportation) for roadway segments.

Average delay for study intersections shall be summarized in a table. The traffic analysis methodologies for the facility types indicated below will be accepted without prior consultation.

3.3.1.1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Analysis of signalized intersections shall use the most current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) using Synchro, Highway Capacity Software (HCS), or other software approved by the City Traffic Engineer.

The procedures in the HCM do not explicitly address operations of closely spaced signalized intersections.

Under such conditions, several unique characteristics must be considered, including spill-back potential from the downstream intersection to the upstream intersection, effects of downstream queues on upstream saturation flow rate, and unusual platoon dispersion or compression between intersections. An example of such closely spaced operations is signalized ramp terminals at urban interchanges. Queue 48 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

intersections between closely spaced intersections may seriously distort the procedures in the HCM. In this case, simulation of the study area may be necessary, as determined by the City Engineer.

3.3.1.2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Analysis of unsignalized intersections shall use the most current edition of the HCM and Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) using Synchro, HCS, or other software approved by the City Engineer.

3.3.1.3 SIGNAL WARRANTS
If signalization is the recommended mitigation for a failed intersection, analysis of signal warrants shall apply the current MUTCD Signal Warrants. At a minimum, Warrants 1 (Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume), 2 (Four-Hour Vehicular Volume), 3 (Peak Hour), and 7 (Crash Experience) shall be analyzed. Additional signal warrants may be on a site-by-site basis (for example, Warrant 9 (Intersection Near a Grade Crossing) when a project is near railroad tracks.

3.3.1.4 ROUNDABOUTS
The SIDRA software may be used for the analysis of individual roundabouts. However, the SIDRA software does not account for the chaining of two roundabouts and the queues associated between the roundabouts. Simulation with proper assumptions is the only way to ensure this analysis is performed correctly. The consultant shall discuss methodology with City staff prior to performing the work for roundabout analysis. The consultant will need a conceptual design of the roundabout for the analysis. The analysis should reflect United States and Fowler driver behavior.

3.3.1.5 LOS ANALYSIS DEFAULT VALUES
While the City does not officially advocate the use of any software, Synchro is the software used by City staff. The analysis shall use the latest published version of the HCM. The LOS analysis at study intersections shall be conducted using the following default values as applicable:
• Use of signal timing plans, if available. If not available, then:
o Minimum split time for protected left-turn phase shall not be less than 12 seconds. o Minimum pedestrian times should be satisfied on all phases with pedestrian phase for signals modeled as coordinated signals.
o If existing cycle lengths are available, they should be utilized. In instances where existing cycle lengths are not available, LOS calculations should be conducted using the natural cycle lengths. The cycle lengths should remain constant for comparison purposes, unless the project is changing the character of the intersection and it is noted in the report. o In instances where signalized intersections are coordinated, coordinated cycle lengths should be determined based on the natural cycle lengths of the coordinated signals and shall be used for evaluation purposes.
o Minimum All-Red time(s) shall equal 1.0 seconds (2.0 seconds when dual left turn lanes are used).
o Minimum Yellow time shall equal 3.5 seconds, or greater based on the approach speeds (3.0 seconds for left turn phases).
• Where existing traffic volumes are collected and peak hour factors are available, then LOS calculations for Existing Condition scenarios and the Near-Term scenarios should use available counted peak hour factors, provided that the traffic counts are included in the Appendix. For all Future-Year scenarios and Existing Conditions where peak hour factors are not available, default factors per the HCM shall be used and shall be consistent throughout the Future-Year scenarios and peak hours.
• Existing storage lengths shall be entered as input data. • All assumptions and defaults used shall have proper citation and justification for their use in the TIS. 49 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

3.4 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Intersection LOS analysis and calculation worksheets, as well as figures showing turning volumes and lane configurations, shall be included in the report for the following traffic scenarios:

A. Existing Conditions – Current year traffic volumes and peak hour LOS analysis B. Existing plus Project Conditions – Trip generation and trip distribution added to the previous scenario and LOS analysis
C. Near-Term Analysis (Existing plus Approved and Pending Projects plus Proposed Project Conditions) – Trip generation and trip distribution for Approved and Pending projects added to the previous scenario and LOS analysis
D. Future-Year Conditions without Project – Long-Range conditions (20 years from existing conditions and/or consistent with the horizon year available from the Fresno COG model) E. Future-Year Conditions with Project – Project traffic added to the previous scenario F. If any project phasing is to take place, then such phasing may be studied at its appropriate build out year in addition to the above scenarios.

If a required mitigation is already included in the City‘s Capital Improvement Program, the development is not responsible for fair-share contribution. If applicable, these intersections shall be identified in the TIS.

Dependent on the timing of the mitigation, the development may be conditioned with its construction and eligible for reimbursement.

3.4.1 FUTURE-YEAR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Future-Year Conditions traffic volumes shall be projected based on the method documented by the Fresno COG model steering committee using procedures such as the increment method. The methodology for developing the forecasts shall be clearly documented in the report. Information from Fresno COG model runs shall be included in the Appendix.

The following scenarios shall be requested from the Fresno COG model to perform this forecasting correctly:
• Future-Year No Project Model Run; and
• Near-Term Model Run for Development Phases, if necessary.

In order to correctly use the model to forecast Future-Year volumes, consultants should contact Fresno COG staff and/or review the Fresno COG webpage.

Consultants should work with Fresno COG staff or approved consultants to prepare a model scope of work request for a basic TIS, and if the analysis is more involved, it may need additional information. The minimum will include reviewing the existing land uses assumed in the model; potentially splitting the TAZs as necessary to more accurately reflect driveways and land uses; and reviewing roadway circulation in the model near the project site. If the consultant is not familiar with the Fresno COG model and the assumptions and information that went into validating the model, the consultant is encouraged to schedule time with the Fresno COG staff to become an expert on the model as the information provided from the model is the basis for the analysis. The consultant will be accountable for the information provided by Fresno COG. The consultant should also provide, in the Appendix, the request for modeling services and the response provided by Fresno COG or modeling consultant when the data is returned. An email response from staff is sufficient.

All assumptions shall have proper citation and justification for their use in the TIS. 50 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

3.5 TRAFFIC COUNTS
Traffic counts should be collected and included in the Appendix. Available existing counts can be used if they are less than twelve (12) months old and the traffic volumes have not been significantly changed due to more recent development in the vicinity. The City Engineer or their designee shall approve all requests to use other available traffic counts.

Common rules for conducting traffic counts include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Peak hour turning movement volumes shall be conducted on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, or Thursdays during weeks not containing a holiday. Counts shall be conducted in favorable weather conditions. • Counts shall be collected when schools and colleges are in session, but not during the first two weeks that the schools and colleges are in session. Counts collected when schools and colleges are not in session shall be approved by the City Engineer, including a methodology for adding historical school traffic volumes into the analysis.
• Counts shall be collected during AM (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and PM (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) peak periods, unless otherwise specified (such as midday or weekend peak periods). • Counts should include the peak hour factor calculation. • A qualified traffic analyst shall observe each study intersection during peak hours of analysis and document their observations such as lane utilization, delay, queue lengths in the field, adjacent intersection queues affecting study intersection capacity, etc.

3.6 TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation should be based on one or more of the following:
• Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (most current edition) o Rates should be calculated using the average weight or weighted average formula when applicable.
o Special consideration should be given for ITE rates based on old data or a small sample and may require additional data collection to determine the appropriate trip generation. • New rates should be generated using community examples for uses not updated or included in the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
• Unless justified and approved by the City Engineer, no pass-by trip or internal trip capture reductions are allowed.
• All assumptions shall have proper citation and justification for their use in the TIS.

Projected daily trips, AM and PM peak hour trips for the approved, pending and proposed project shall be summarized in a table. Trip generation rates, factors and source, as well as the totals for the inbound and outbound trips shall also be provided in a table. Projects that intend to amend the General Plan shall also include the assumed trip generation rate of the existing land use. Trip generation should be summarized in a table form similar to the one below:

Land
Use Size
Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate
In/Out
Trips
In/Out
Trip
Total
Rate
In/Out
Trips
In/Out
Trip
Total
Total
51 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

Land Uses in the General Plan were analyzed with the densities and intensities as follows:

Land Use Density FAR
Low Density Residential 2.88 -
Medium Low Density Residential 4.40 -
Medium Density Residential 6.48 -
Medium High Density Residential 10.80 -
High Density Residential 17.44 -
Neighborhood Commercial - 0.2
Community Commercial 17.44 0.2
General Commercial - 0.2
Light Industrial - 0.3
Heavy Industrial - 0.3
Parks/Open Space - 0.025
Public Facilities - 0.1

3.7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution shall be based on existing travel patterns, locations of complimentary land uses, and/or information derived from the Fresno COG travel model such as a “select zone” analysis.

A figure illustrating the percentage of peak hour traffic going to and from various destinations along the transportation network shall be provided. A figure illustrating peak hour project-only trips at the driveways, study intersections, and roadway segments shall be provided based on the trip distribution. If the trip distribution is different between Existing, Near-Term, and Future-Year conditions, then a figure needs to be provided for each different trip distribution with supporting discussion and justification.

The travel model should be used for a general trip distribution to and from the north, south, east, and west directions; however, the project trips should be manually distributed to the driveways, intersections, and roadway segments. The travel model should not be relied upon to distribute project trips to specific intersection and driveway turn movements.

3.8 APPROVED AND PENDING PROJECTS
Approved and pending projects located within the vicinity of the project (i.e., developments generating vehicle trips that would impact study intersections and/or roadway segments) or as determined by the City Engineer, that can reasonably be expected to be in place by the project's build out year must be included in the analysis. Related projects shall include all approved, pending, or constructed projects that are not occupied at the time of the existing traffic counts. A list of approved and pending projects shall be requested from the City Engineer and indicated in the TIS.

A table summarizing the approved and pending projects with their locations, and trip generation shall be provided. If conditional use permit/parcel map/tract numbers are available, then they should be provided in the table. Pending projects are defined as those projects that have been accepted for processing by the City of Fowler Planning and Development Department.

Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) should be identified and documented with funding source and anticipated completion year. City Engineering staff should be contacted for information on CIP projects near a given project.
52 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

3.9 SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
If the City Engineer determines that on-site conditions could result in sub-standard delays on the adjacent roadways due to excessive queues to or from the site, site access and circulation analysis shall be conducted, and recommendations shall be included in the TIS to address safe and acceptable traffic operations. A figure illustrating the proposed site plan with proposed primary access points should be provided. Discussion on the location and distance of the access points from nearby intersections shall also be provided. The proposed site plan shall illustrate access points and peak hour project-only trips at the access points. For projects that are anticipated to generate truck traffic, truck operations shall also be evaluated to ensure adequacy of site design to satisfy truck loading demand on-site and within the vicinity of the project site, and to ensure that traffic operations on roadways and intersection are satisfactory.

The TIS should calculate anticipated queues and minimum required throat depth (MRTD) at the project access points and summarize these in a table. The analysis should also evaluate the proposed site plan for sight distance and other unsafe traffic conditions and provide recommendations to mitigate them.

The TIS shall also conceptually address safe pedestrian paths of travel from:
• residential developments to school sites;
• public streets to commercial and residential areas; and • nearby bus stops to project sites.

3.10 QUEUEING AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS
Queuing analysis for study intersections shall be conducted and documented in the TIS based on the LOS calculations. Recommendations for queues under existing conditions or projected to exceed the available storage shall be provided. Recommendations such as, but not limited to, extending existing storage and adding exclusive turn lanes and innovative techniques shall be considered and recommended.

3.11 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS THRESHOLDS
For study signalized intersections, a traffic operations issue is identified if the addition of the traffic generated from the proposed project results in any one of the following:
• Triggers a signalized intersection operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable levels of service
• Increases the average delay for a study signalized intersection that is already operating at unacceptable LOS
Unsignalized intersections should maintain a Level of Service no worse than LOS C. Unsignalized intersections may include all-way stop, or two-way stop controlled. The delay for unsignalized intersections should be computed as follows:
• All-way stop-controlled – use average delay
• Two-way stop-controlled – use worst approach delay
Improvements to unsignalized intersections may include a change of traffic control, including yield control, traffic circle/roundabout, or a traffic signal. The CA MUTCD states that if one or more of the criteria for signal warrants is met, an engineering study is required to evaluate other factors to determine if an intersection must be signalized. When analyzed, the peak hour and 8-hour traffic signal warrants should be used to determine if a traffic signal is recommended to improve the adverse effects identified at an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, if a project is near a school or a downtown area with substantial 53 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Page 3 ends

pedestrian activity, then the City may require additional warrants to be evaluated such as pedestrian, accident history, etc. The City reserves the right to determine if a warranted signal will be installed.

3.12 FAIR-SHARE CONTRIBUTION
For any intersections requiring mitigation, the project’s fair-share contribution percentage shall be calculated per Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. The Project's fair shares are calculated utilizing the formula below:

P =
T
TB − TE
Where:

P = Equitable share for the proposed project's traffic impact.

T = Project peak-hour trips entering the intersection.

TB = Forecasted Future-Year peak-hour volumes entering the intersection.

TE = Existing + Approved peak-hour volumes entering the intersection.

It is required that the Project contribute its equitable fair share for the future improvements necessary to maintain an acceptable LOS. However, fair share contributions should only be made for those facilities or portion thereof currently not funded by the responsible agencies roadway impact fee program(s), as appropriate.

Traffic Impact Studies are not required to provide construction costs for the recommended mitigation measures, only the fair-share percentages.

3.13 ANALYSIS DISCUSSION
The TIS shall be provided as an electronic PDF copy to the City Engineer, according to the report format presented in Appendix B. The TIS should discuss conclusions regarding the transportation issues caused by the proposed project on the roadway system. If the traffic generated by this and other projects requires improvements that are not covered by current impact fees, then the project’s fair share percentage shall be calculated using peak-hour volumes and provided in the TIS.

For all recommendations to increase the number of travel lanes on a street or at an intersection as an improvement, the TIS must clearly identify the impacts associated with such a change, such as whether or not additional right of way will be required and whether it is feasible to acquire the right of way based on the level of development of the adjacent land and buildings, if any. All improvements should be reviewed in the field to make sure that they can be accommodated. If they cannot be accommodated or are not feasible, those findings need to be included in the TIS.

The TIS should discuss other possible adverse impacts on traffic. Examples of such impacts include:
• the limited visibility of access points on curved roadways • the need for pavement widening to provide left-turn and right-turn lanes at access points into the proposed project
• the impact of increased traffic volumes on local residential streets • the need for road realignment to improve sight distance Projects which propose to amend the City’s General Plan Land Use and substantially increase potential traffic generation must provide an analysis of the project at current planned land use versus proposed land use in the build out condition for the project area, including Future-Year conditions. The purpose of such analysis is to provide decision makers with the understanding of the planned circulation network’s ability to accommodate additional traffic generation caused by the proposed General Plan Land Use amendments. 54 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page A-1
Appendix A: Low VMT Areas
55 Section 8, Item 8C.

E Clayton Ave
TTooyyoottaa PPll
E Adams Ave
E Manning Ave
E Maiinn Stt
E Merced St
E Merced St
E Jefferson Ave
S Pea
ch
AAvvee
N Seventh StN Seventh St
S Sixth StS Sixth St
SS FFiifftthh SStt
N Sixtthh SStt
S Seventh StS Seventh St
S Harris AveS Harris Ave
Road A
Road A
E Walter Ave
S Golden State BlvdS Golden State Blvd
E American Ave
E Adams Ave
SS EEiigghhtthh SStt
E Sumner Ave
N Golden State BlvdN Golden State Blvd
E South Ave
E Parlier Ave
S Willow
Ave S Willow
Ave
E South Ave
S Temperance Ave S Temperance Ave
E Mott Ave
S Golden State BlvdS Golden State Blvd
S Armstrong Ave S Armstrong Ave
S Clovis Ave S Clovis Ave
E Clayton Ave
S Temperance Ave S Temperance Ave
S Fo
wler Ave S Fo
wler Ave
S Te
mperance
Ave S Te
mperance
Ave
S Locan Ave S Locan Ave
S D
e
Wolf Ave S D
e
Wolf Ave
E Lincoln Ave
S Villa Ave S Villa Ave
E Clayton Ave
S Clovis Ave S Clovis Ave
E Jefferson Ave
S Burgan Ave S Burgan Ave
S Kenneth Ave S Kenneth Ave
S Fowler Ave S Fowler Ave
E Lincoln Ave
S Peach Ave S Peach Ave
S Minnewawa Ave S Minnewawa Ave
E Springfield Ave
E Jefferson Ave
∙þ99
0 20.31
0 19.23

18.09 18.71

18.8 20.02
0 25.78

17.37 18.69

19.23 24.57

18.75 19.53

22.6 22.15

21.44 0

20.63 30.58

19.81 18.88
0 0
0 0
0 0

9.1 20.38

18.99 0
0 24.93
0 25.01
0 0

20.05 22.04
0 H:\26\26268 - Fowler General Plan Model Support\GIS\VMT MXDs\02 VMT per Capita for 2019.mxd Date: 6/28/2022 Figure 2
VMT per Capita for 2019
Fowler, California
[ 2019 VMT per Capita by TAZ 0 0.5Miles
No Data
Less than 13% Below Regional Average
13% Below to Regional Average
Regional Average to 13% Above
More than 13% above Regional Average
Sphere of Influence
Fowler City Limits
VMT Per Capita Regional Average = 16.1
Source: Fresno COG Activity Based Model (ABM), Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 56 Section 8, Item 8C.

29.23 63.3

27.46 29.15

35.88 30.58

27.58 27.67

39.44 50.4

43.91 32.03

39.56 0

35.49 31.49
0 13.63

18.35 95.55
0 0
0 19.17

33.56 31.28
0 34.15

35.81 53.71
0 0
0 0

50.31 27.67

30.74 41.68
0 0

37.51 0

32.83 H:\26\26268 - Fowler General Plan Model Support\GIS\VMT MXDs\03 VMT per Employee for 2019.mxd Date: 6/28/2022 Figure 3
VMT per Employee for 2019
Fowler, California
[ 2019 VMT per Employee by TAZ 0 0.5Miles
No Data
Less than 13% Below Regional Average
13% Below to Regional Average
Regional Average to 13% Above
More than 13% above Regional Average
Sphere of Influence
Fowler City Limits
VMT Per Employee Regional Average = 25.6
Source: Fresno COG Activity Based Model (ABM), Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 57 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page B-1
Appendix B: TIS Report Format

1. Cover Page
o Project Address
o Project Name (if applicable)
o Client Name
o Preparation Date (MM/DD/YYYY)
o Consultant Contact Information
▪ Name
▪ Phone Number
o Entitlement Number
o Stamp and/or signature of qualified engineer or authorized owner/principal of firm stating the study was prepared and reviewed under their supervision and direction.

2. Table of Contents

3. List of Figures

4. List of Tables

5. Executive Summary
o Provide summary of the TIS, project location and size, intersections analyzed, study scenarios, impacts, mitigation and recommendations in a figure and table. o Methodology used to analyze the impacts does not need to be included in the executive summary. Document results of LOS analysis, intersections and roadway segments o Provide summary of site access and circulation. Results of LOS analysis should be summarized in a table form as follows for both existing and Future-Year scenarios:

Existing Existing plus Project
Existing plus
Approved and
Pending Projects plus
Project
Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS

6. Introduction
o Provide description of the project, location, size and proposed primary access. A vicinity map showing the site location and the study area relative to other transportation systems along with study intersections and roadway segments should be provided. Document study intersections, roadway segments and study scenarios providing brief explanation on each study scenarios.

7. Methodology
o Describe the methodology used to analyze the impacts of the study and the thresholds for determining an impact.

8. Existing Conditions
o Provide a description of existing streets and roadways within the project site (if any) and in the surrounding area. Include information on the roadway classifications (per the applicable Circulation Element6), the number of lanes, posted speed limits, divided/undivided and bike lanes.
o Existing daily directional and peak-hour through and turning traffic volumes on the roadways surrounding and/or logically associated with the project site, including major highways and freeways. Local streets affected by the project should also be shown. Each 6 Where a street is located outside City limits, but in the City’s Sphere of Influence, the City’s street classification shall be used. In all other instances, the street classification adopted by the respective jurisdiction shall be used. 58 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page B-2
report shall include appendices providing count data used in the preparation of the report.

The source and date of the traffic volume information shall be indicated. A figure illustrating the peak hour traffic volumes, lane configurations, and traffic control at the study intersections and roadway segments should be provided.
o All assumed roadways and intersections or any other transportation circulation improvements must be identified and discussed. The discussion should include the scope and the status of the assumed improvements including the construction schedule and financing plan.
o Any transit facilities within 1,320 feet of the project or study intersections/roadways segments, including the service provider(s), routes, frequency and location/amenities of existing bus stops should be provided. Existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities adjacent to the project site, utilized by the project, connected to by the project, or impacted by the project should be identified and described in detail. o Results of LOS analysis should be summarized in table (in a format illustrated above) and discussed. If any of the study intersections or roadway segments are operating at unacceptable levels, mitigation measures should be identified.

9. Project Description
o A description of the project, including factors which quantify traffic generators, e.g., dwelling units, square feet of office space, persons to be employed, restaurant seats, acres of raw land, etc. Provide site plan including access, project-only trips at the access points, circulation, parking, and loading as applicable.

10. Trip Generation and Trip Distribution
o Provide trip generation and trip distribution. Provide any relevant information, discussion if applicable.

11. Existing plus Project Conditions
o This scenario is required by CEQA to show the impacts of the proposed project on the existing conditions. It should include a project description, trip generation and distribution, level of service analysis, and appropriate tables, figures, and recommendations/mitigation as described below.

12. Level of Service Analysis
o Provide a figure illustrating peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections and roadway segments for Existing plus Proposed Project Conditions. Results of LOS analysis should be summarized in table and discussed. If any of the study intersections or roadway segments are projected to operate at unacceptable levels, mitigation measures should be identified.

13. Site Access and Circulation
o Provide site access and circulation analysis and discussion as per the “SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION” Section of this document. Provide a figure showing on site and circulation recommendations.

14. Near Term Analysis (Existing plus Approved and Pending Projects plus Project Conditions) o Approved and pending projects located within the vicinity of project, (projects that would impact study intersections and/or roadway segments or as determined by Traffic Engineering Manager), that can reasonably be expected to be in place by the project's construction year along with the trip generation should be summarized in a table. A figure illustrating the Existing plus Approved and Pending Projects Plus Proposed Project peak hour traffic volumes should be provided.
o Results of LOS analysis should be summarized in table and discussed. If any of the study intersections or roadway segments are projected to operate at unacceptable levels, mitigation measures should be identified.

15. Future-Year and Future-Year plus Project Conditions 59 Section 8, Item 8C.

City of Fowler January 2025
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Page B-3
o Provide similar information for both scenarios as above referenced scenarios. Please discuss in detail how the traffic volume forecasts were developed using the Fresno COG model. This information should be easy to follow and reproducible by a peer consultant.

16. Queuing
o Discuss and provide recommendations to mitigate unacceptable queues at study intersections under appropriate scenarios as applicable.

17. Signal Warrants
o Provide signal warrants analysis and discuss results of the analysis under appropriate scenarios as applicable.

18. Conclusion

19. Mitigations & Recommendations
o Provide objective recommendations in a table or figure and discuss the timing and funding of recommendations.

20. Fair-share Contribution

21. Appendix
o Traffic Counts
o Fresno COG Model Runs and Turning Movement Forecast Outputs o Signal Warrants
o References and Bibliography
o Level Service Calculation Sheets
60 Section 8, Item 8C.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2025
FROM: THOMAS W. GAFFERY IV, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION of Ordinance No. 2025-01 amending sections 4-

4.203, 4-4.209, 4-4.210 and 4-4.212 of Chapter 4 of Title 4, and adding Article 7 to Chapter 4 of Title 4 of the Fowler Municipal Code related to on-street parking of semi-trucks within the City

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This proposed Ordinance simplifies existing language relative to semi-truck and commercial vehicle parking within the City. It also adds additional provisions relative to semi-truck parking, to allow for additional parking enforcement and the ability to tow semi-trucks parked areas posted with signs after forty-eight (48) hours.

BACKGROUND
Both on-street and off-street parking of commercial vehicles and semi-trucks continues to be an ongoing nuisance in various areas throughout the City. Off-street semi-truck parking in unauthorized areas (such as residential side yards, residential driveways, and unimproved lots) is handled by the City’s code enforcement officers via the issuance of Administrative Citations. This proposed Ordinance removes redundant language, clarifies confusing language, and removes references to unnecessary maps and figures. Time limits related to parking were reconciled across the Ordinance for consistency.

If approved, when this Ordinance is brought for adoption, staff will also bring an update to the City’s Master Fee Schedule to reflect additional penalties for improperly parked commercial vehicles and semi-trucks in accordance with the Ordinance.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A Public Hearing Notice was published in The Fresno Business Journal on December 20, 2024, which is at least ten (10) days prior to a public hearing scheduled for January 7, 2025.

At the January 7, 2025 public hearing, Council continued the introduction of the Ordinance to January 21, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act 61 Section 10, Item 10A.
(CEQA). CEQA Guidelines section 15378 defines a “project” as an action which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. It is not reasonably foreseeable that this action would create either a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, and therefore environmental review under CEQA is not required.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Goal MOB-3
Goods movement throughout the planning area is efficient and safe.

Policy MOB-20
Encourage the efficient movement of goods.

Policy MOB-21
Facilitate goods movement and delivery through internal site design of commercial and industrial areas.

Policy MOB-22
Ensure truck access points and loading facilities are designed to reduce conflict with sensitive land uses.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with hearing the introduction of this proposed Ordinance.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
No procurement is associated with this action.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Ordinance No. 2025-01
62 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 1 of 7 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER, AMENDING ARTICLE 2 AND ADDING ARTICLE 7 TO CHAPTER 4 OF TITLE 4 OF THE

FOWLER MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SEMI-TRUCK PARKING
WHEREAS, providing on-street parking is an essential public benefit for economic development, and the convenience of residents; and
WHEREAS, some commercial vehicles and semi-trucks can cause negative externalities to the community including noise, traffic, safety hazards, and visual blight; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to regulate on-street parking for the benefit of all Fowler residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to regulate on-street parking within the City’s jurisdiction.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council has determined that the Ordinance does not constitute a “project” for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378.

SECTION 2: Sections 4-4.203, 4-4.209, 4-4.210 and 4-4.212 of Chapter 4 of Title 4 of the Fowler Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
4-4.203 Removal of vehicles from streets.

Any regularly employed and salaried officer of the Police Department may remove or cause to be removed:
(a) Any vehicle which has been parked or left standing upon a street or alley for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours;
(b) Any vehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street or alley where such parking or standing is prohibited by an ordinance or resolution of the City and signs are posted giving notice of such removal; and
(c) Any vehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street or alley where the use of such street or alley, or a portion thereof, is necessary for the cleaning, repair, or 63 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 2 of 7 ends

construction of the street or alley or for the installation of underground utilities, or where the use of the street or alley, or any portion thereof, is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic, or where the use of the street or alley, or any portion thereof, is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles, or structures of unusual size and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or interfere with such use or movement; provided, however, signs giving notice that such vehicle may be removed shall be erected or placed at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to such removal.
(d) Any vehicle defined in 4-4.701 pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22651, subdivision (n), if left for forty-eight (48) hours or more in areas where signs are posted notifying of such removal.
4-4.209 Vehicles in excess of 6,000 pounds—Parking on Adams Avenue and Fowler Avenue.
(a) Weight and Width Limits—Limited Parking. It is unlawful for any person to park any truck or other vehicle exceeding a weight of 6,000 pounds or exceeding a width of eighty-four (84) inches regardless of weight, along either of the curbs of Adams Avenue or along either of the curbs of Fowler Avenue for a period longer than thirty (30) consecutive minutes.
(b) Prohibited Parking. It is unlawful to park any vehicle, regardless of weight, on the north side of Adams Avenue from the point of the northerly prolongation of the east side of Vista Street to a distance of 1,188 feet north on Adams Avenue, as designated on a map marked "Exhibit A", attached to Ordinance No. 82-5, on file in the office of the City Clerk. Said described area shall be marked or posted as provided by law.
64 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 3 of 7 ends

4-4.210 Vehicles in excess of 6,000 pounds or 84 inches wide—Parking on Vineyard Place and San Antonio Drive.
(a) Weight and Width Limits—Prohibited Parking. It is unlawful for any person to park any truck or other vehicle exceeding a weight of 6,000 pounds, or exceeding a width of eighty-four (84) inches regardless of weight, for a period longer than two (2) consecutive hours as follows:
(i) Along either of the curbs (north and south side) of Vineyard Place (ii) Along the south curb of San Antonio Drive between Vineyard Place and Golden State Boulevard
(iii) Along the north curb of San Antonio Drive between Vineyard Place and a point approximately 960 feet west of Golden State Boulevard (b) Weight and Width Limits—Limited Parking. It is unlawful for any person to park for a period longer than two (2) consecutive hours any truck or other vehicle exceeding a weight of 6,000 pounds, or exceeding a width of eighty-four (84) inches regardless of weight, as follows:

Along the north curb of San Antonio Drive between from a point approximately 960 feet west of Golden State Boulevard easterly to Golden State Boulevard For purposes of this subsection, if a person moves a vehicle from the restricted parking area within two (2) hours and returns to the restricted area within a period of fifteen (15) minutes, the person shall be considered to have been parked continuously and a new two (2) hour time period shall not start.
(c) Designated Map—Posting. A map designating the parking prohibition and restrictions set forth in this section is attached as Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 2002-03, on file in the office of the City Clerk. The designated area shall be marked or posted as provided by law. 65 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 4 of 7 ends

4-4.212 Commercial vehicles in excess of 6,000 pounds or 84 inches wide—Prohibited parking—Exceptions.
(a) Weight and Width Limits—Prohibited Parking. It is unlawful for any person to park any commercial vehicle exceeding a weight of 6,000 pounds, or exceeding a width of eightyfour (84) inches regardless of weight, as follows:
(1) Along either of the curbs (north and south side) of any City street; (2) On a vacant or unimproved lot unless such parking is in connection with an adjoining business and permitted by required governmental land use approvals; (3) In violation of any zoning ordinance.

For the purposes of this section, a “commercial vehicle” shall be as defined in Vehicle Code section 260 and means a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered and used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property. (b) Exceptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the following:
(1) Where parking is expressly permitted by City ordinance or resolution and posted as such;
(2) When a vehicle is parked for a period of fifteen (15) minutes or less along either of the curbs (north and south side) of any designated truck route and parking is not otherwise prohibited by City ordinance or resolution. In no event shall a trailer be disconnected from a truck while so parked; (3) Where the vehicle is being used temporarily for the purposes of, and while actually engaged in, the loading or unloading of passengers or materials, and shall not extend beyond the time necessary therefore, and in no event for more than twelve (12) hours.
66 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 5 of 7 ends

(c) Designated Map—Posting. A map designating the parking prohibition and restrictions set forth in this section is attached as Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 2004-06, on file in the office of the City Clerk. The designated area shall be marked or posted as provided by law.

SECTION 3: Article 7 of Chapter 4 of Title 4 of the Fowler Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

Article 7 – Semi-Truck Parking
4-4.701 Definitions
For the purposes of this Article, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "Semi" shall mean any vehicle having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds or more, or any trailer or semi-trailer, as defined by California Vehicle Code sections 550, 630, 635 or 636, used and maintained for commercial purposes, and designed for use with, or actually used in conjunction with a Semi, whether licensed or unlicensed.
(b) "Attended" shall mean that the driver or operator of the vehicle or trailer must be physically present, or within the reasonable proximity of the vehicle while parked. In the case of a delivery or transport vehicle, "attended" shall also mean that the driver or operator of the vehicle shall be in the act of delivering or accepting the merchandise to or from the customer, or obtaining signatures from the customer, or providing the customer with any necessary receipts or other documentation of the transaction related to the delivery.
4-4.702 On-Street Storage of Semi-Trucks
It shall be unlawful to place, or have placed, park, keep, or maintain any Semi-truck on any public street, alley, right of way, or highway, other than a state highway, in the City of Fowler for a period exceeding two (2) hours.
67 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 6 of 7 ends

4-4.703 Exceptions
This Article shall not apply under the following conditions:
(a) Any vehicle as defined under this Article making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building or structure or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure for which a building permit has previously been obtained. This exception shall apply only to any such vehicles that are attended, and shall not extend beyond the time necessary therefore, and in no event for more than twelve (12) hours.
(b) Any vehicle as defined in this Article parked in connection with, and in the aid of, the performance of a service to or on a property in the block in which such vehicle is parked.
(c) Any school or passenger bus under the jurisdiction of a recognized school district; (d) Any vehicle as defined in this Article owned by a city, county, state, public entity or licensed contractor engaged in the installation, maintenance, or repair of any public property, utility or highway.
(e) Any authorized emergency vehicle as defined by the California Vehicle Code. (f) For no more than two (2) additional hours when emergency repairs are in progress and the vehicle is attended.
(g) For any tow truck designed to tow vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds or more, and which is in the act of towing such vehicle.
(h) Where parking is expressly permitted by City ordinance or resolution and posted as such.
68 Section 10, Item 10A.

Page 7 of 7 ends

(i) When a vehicle is parked for a period of fifteen (15) minutes or less along either of the curbs of any designated truck route, and parking not otherwise prohibited by ordinance or resolution. In no event shall a semi-trailer be disconnected from a semi-truck while so parked.

SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31) day after its adoption.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is further directed to cause this ordinance or a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Fowler, within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the January 21, 2025, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council held on _______________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
69 Section 10, Item 10A.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2025
FROM: DAWN E. MARPLE, City Planner
SUBJECT: ADOPT Resolution No. 2764 Approving an updated fee schedule for Planning Fees and Development Impact Fees

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approving updated fee schedules for the City’s planning fees and development impact fees with increased fees based on inflation will allow the City to recover the estimated costs incurred to process development applications and entitlements, and allow the City to collect the estimated costs for facilities and improvements needed to serve future development projects. Additionally, a fee will be established for the Zone Clearance process.

BACKGROUND
Planning Fees
The City of Fowler imposes planning fees to offset the cost to the City of processing, reviewing, and approving planning and development applications. The amounts of the planning fees are set by City Council Resolution. As done previously, planning fees are increased annually based on the Engineering News-Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index to cover the increased cost to the City of providing the services.

Government Code Section 66000 et seq., (specifically section 66014) authorizes the City to charge fees to applicants for development entitlements to process applications provided the amount of the fee charged does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. Fees should be set at amounts so the applicant is covering the cost to the City of processing the application.

The ENR Construction Cost Index increased 1.6% from January 2024 to January 2025. This index is a commonly used inflation measure in the building industry. The City is authorized to increase applicable fees to keep up with increased costs to the City of processing such applications and entitlements. An inflationary increase in the planning fees is necessary for the City to recover, from the applicant, the increased costs to the City in processing applications and entitlements for proposed development projects. The proposed increase in fees, in the attached updated Planning Fee Schedule (2025) (Exhibit A), does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City of providing such services by City staff and consultants. 70 Section 10, Item 10B.

Zone Clearance Fee
The City adopted a revised Planning Fee Schedule (2024) on August 20, 2024, in order to update the existing fee schedule to account for newly adopted processes included in the City’s new development code. By oversight, the newly established Zoning Clearance process was not given a unique fee for processing at that time. Staff now desires to establish a fee for Zone Clearances in order to account for staff time processing these requests. Based on staff time for processing past Zone Clearances without a formally adopted fee, the proposed fee to be established is $620.

Development Impact Fees
The City of Fowler imposes development impact fees to fund facilities and improvements needed to serve new development. Fowler Municipal Code Section 3-8.01 authorizes development impact fees for: (1) general facilities necessary for the administration of the City; (2) law enforcement facilities and equipment; (3) fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment; (4) storm drainage facilities; (5) water supply facilities; (6) wastewater facilities; (7) traffic facilities; (8) groundwater recharge facilities; and (9) parks and recreation facilities. The last approved increase in development impact fees occurred in January 2024.

Fowler Municipal Code Section 3-8.06 authorizes the development impact fees to be adjusted each calendar year to account for inflation based on the National Average Construction Cost Index as published by the ENR, or similar construction cost indexes. Such an increase is subject to City Council review and approval by resolution, and is not deemed an increase in the amount of the fee subject to the provisions of Sections 66000, et seq., of the California Government Code.

As discussed above, the ENR Construction Cost Index increased 1.6% from January 2024 to January 2025. Again, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the City is authorized to charge development impact fees to developers as a condition of approval of development projects to fund the estimated costs of facilities and improvements needed to serve the new development. As the City continues to grow and costs continue to rise, the increased fees will help the City collect sufficient funds to provide new or improved facilities and infrastructure needed to serve new development.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A Notice of Public Hearing was duly published in The Business Journal on January 10, 2024, and January 15, 2024, in accordance with Government Code section 6062a.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with the following General Plan Policies and Goals:

General Plan Goal ED-3
Fowler invests in necessary infrastructure, resources, and beautification to ensure the success of economic development strategies.
71 Section 10, Item 10B.

General Plan Policy OS-17
The City shall use a broad range of funding and economic development tools to ensure high quality development, maintenance, and programming of the City parks, trails, and recreation system.

General Plan Policy OS-18
All residential projects shall be subject to the payment of park development impact fees, as adopted by resolution of the City Council. Payment of these development impact fees shall be in addition to any parkland dedication or in-lieu fee payment requirements in accordance with Fowler’s adopted Quimby Act Ordinance, as applicable, except as provided for in Policy OS-6.

General Plan Goal PF-1
Fowler provides reliable public facilities, utilities, and community services that meet the needs of the existing community and planned growth.

General Plan Policy PF-1
Require private and public land developments to provide all on-site and off-site facility improvements or pay in-lieu fees necessary to mitigate any development-generated public facility impacts.

General Plan Policy PF-3
Ensure that land divisions and developments are approved only when a project’s improvements, dedications, and fees fully cover incremental costs to the City and other agencies. Such improvements and infrastructure include parks, major streets, traffic signals, streetlights, drainage systems, sewer, water, fire, police, schools, and other related facilities.

General Plan Policy PF-4
Regularly evaluate and update, as necessary, development impact fees and other applicable City fees.

General Plan Policy PF-17
Continue to establish development fees and user rates that are sufficient to operate, maintain, and upgrade (for current and future regulatory requirements) the City’s water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT
This action will result in additional general fund revenue to offset the City’s increased costs in processing proposed development projects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Attachment 1: Resolution No. 2764
- Exhibit A: Planning Fee Schedule
- Exhibit B Development Impact Fee Schedule
72 Section 10, Item 10B.

RESOLUTION NO. 2764

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER

APPROVING UPDATED FEE SCHEDULES FOR PLANNING FEES AND

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq. and 66014, the City of Fowler (City) is authorized to impose planning fees on applicants for new development projects; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq. and Chapter 8 of Title 3 of the Fowler Municipal Code, the City is authorized to impose development impact fees as a condition of approval of new development projects; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 2206, adopted on October 19, 2020, authorizes an annual inflationary adjustment to the planning fees charged by the City to reflect the increase in construction costs by a percentage equal to the national average construction cost index as published by the Engineering News Record; and
WHEREAS, Fowler Municipal Code section 3-8.06 authorizes an annual inflationary adjustment to development impact fees to reflect the increase in construction costs by a percentage equal to the national average construction cost index as published by the Engineering News Record, or similar construction cost indexes; and
WHEREAS, the inflationary index for 2025 is 1.6%, and the proposed increased fees are reflected in the respective schedules attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, a new fee for the processing of Zone Clearances has been proposed as a part of the City of Fowler Planning Fee Schedule (2025); and WHEREAS, the Zone Clearance process was established as a part of the City’s development code update, adopted in August of 2024; and WHEREAS, the proposed fee for Zone Clearances has been set based on staff experience in processing zone clearances without a unique fee for the process; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on January 21, 2025, at 6:00pm, the Fowler City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed increased fees reflected in the City of Fowler Planning Fee Schedule (2025) (Exhibit A attached hereto) and City of Fowler Development Impact Fee Schedule (2025) (Exhibit B attached hereto); and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly published in the January 10, 2025 and January 15, 2025, edition of The Business Journal in accordance with Government Code Section 6062a, posted at City Hall and on the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and WHEREAS, the City Council has independently reviewed and considered the City of Fowler 73 Section 10, Item 10B.

Planning Fee Schedule (2025) and City of Fowler Development Impact Fee Schedule (2025) attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively, and has evaluated and considered all written and oral comments and other information provided during the public hearing,

NOW THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The updated Planning Fee Schedule (2025) attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved, and the rates, fees, and charges set forth therein shall be effective beginning sixty (60) days after the adoption of this resolution, in accordance with Government Code Section 66017.

2. The updated Development Impact Fee Schedule (2025) attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved, and the rates, fees, and charges set forth therein shall be effective beginning sixty (60) days after the adoption of this resolution, in accordance with Government Code Section 66017.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January 2025, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
74 Section 10, Item 10B.

Abandoned Residential Property Registration $344 1.6% $349 Abandonment of Right-of-Way $2,744 1.6% $2,787
Accessory Dwelling Unit $750 1.6% $750
Administrative Review $1,013 1.6% $1,029 See Notes 1, 2 Annexation / Pre-zone (0-6 acres) $7,167 1.6% $7,281 See Notes 1, 2 Annexation / Pre-zone (6 plus acres) $10,502 1.6% $10,670 See Notes 1, 2 Annexation Extension $685 1.6% $696
Appeal to the City Council $620 1.6% $630 See Note 6
Appeal to the Planning Commission $620 1.6% $630 See Note 6 Building Demolition Permit $556 1.6% $565
Deferral Agreement $906 1.6% $920
Finding of EIR Conformity $1,941 1.6% $1,972 See Note 3 Health and Safety Inspection $116 1.6% $118
In Lieu Parking Fee (at least 75% of parking requirement must be met, per space) $5,824 1.6% $5,917 Ministerial Plan Review (does not include Accessory Dwelling Units) $570 1.6% $579 Out of Area Service Agreement $1,295 1.6% $1,316 See Notes 1, 2 Planned Development Permit $2,874 1.6% $2,920
Reasonable Accomodation Hourly --------- --------- See Note 7 Temporary Sign/Banner $39 1.6% $40
Water Well Demolition $537 1.6% $545
Conditional Use Permit - Amendment, Major $1,436 1.6% $1,459 See Note 6 Conditional Use Permit - Amendment, Minor $570 1.6% $579 Conditional Use Permit - Extension $1,209 1.6% $1,228 See Note 6 Conditional Use Permit - Major $2,874 1.6% $2,920 See Notes 1, 2, 6 Conditional Use Permit - Minor $1,436 1.6% $1,459 See Notes 1, 2, 6 Temporary Use Permit $185 1.6% $188
Development Agreement $5,487 1.6% $5,575 See Notes 1, 2 Development Agreement - Amendment $1,714 1.6% $1,742
Categorical Exemption $506 1.6% $514
Environmental Review - Negative Declaration $6,308 1.6% $6,409 See Notes 1, 2, 3 Environmental Review - Mitigated Negative Declaration $7,884 1.6% $8,010 See Notes 1, 2, 3 Environmental Review - EIR $14,293 1.6% $14,522 See Notes 1, 2, 3 Environmental Notice of Determination - Negative Declaration --------- --------- --------- See Note 4 Environmental Notice of Determination - EIR --------- --------- --------- See Note 4 General Plan Amendment
Major (greater than 5 acre sites) $5,242 1.6% $5,326 See Notes 1, 2 Minor (5 acre or less sites) $2,620 1.6% $2,662 See Notes 1, 2 General Plan Amendment with Concurrent Rezoning
Major (greater than 5 acre sites) $7,766 1.6% $7,890 See Notes 1, 2 Minor (5 acre or less sites) $3,883 1.6% $3,946 See Notes 1, 2 Garage Sale Permit (after 2 sales) $36 1.6% $36
Home Occupation Permit $51 1.6% $52
Specific Plan --------- --------- --------- See Note 3
Exhibit A
Planning Fee Schedule 2025
2025
2024 Fee Increase % 2025 Fee
City of Fowler
Conditional Use Permit
Environmental Review
Type of Application Notes
75 Section 10, Item 10B.

Lot Line Adjustment $2,018 1.6% $2,050 See Notes 1, 2
Tentative Parcel Map $5,302 1.6% $5,387 See Notes 1, 2
Final Parcel Map $4,938 1.6% $5,017 See Notes 1, 2
Revised Parcel Map $1,998 1.6% $2,030 See Notes 1, 2
Tentative Subdivision Map - Small (5-10 lots) $10,611 1.6% $10,781 See Notes 1, 2 Tentative Subdivision Map - Greater than 10 lots $12,623 1.6% $12,825 See Notes 1, 2 Final Subdivision Map - Small (5-10 lots) $3,523 1.6% $3,580 Final Subdivision Map - Greater than 10 lots $5,433 1.6% $5,520 Revised Tentative Subdivision Map $7,225 1.6% $7,341 See Notes 1, 2 Tentative Tract Map Extension $1,209 1.6% $1,228
Landscaping / Conservation Review - Residential $723 1.6% $735 Landscaping / Conservation Review - Commercial $1,484 1.6% $1,507 Manufactured Housing Permit $492 1.6% $500
Sign Review $146 1.6% $148
Site Plan Review
Major (greater than 1 acre sites) $2,874 1.6% $2,920 See Notes 1, 2 Minor (1 acre or less sites) $1,436 1.6% $1,459 See Notes 1, 2 Major Amendment $1,436 1.6% $1,459
Minor Amendment $570 1.6% $579
Preliminary Map/Site Plan Review (after 1 review) $750 1.6% $762 Major (commercial, industrial, multifamilyl) $1,994 1.6% $2,025 See Notes 1, 2 Minor (single family residential) $996 1.6% $1,012 See Notes 1, 2 Minor Deviation $145 1.6% $147
Classification of Zoning Use $685 1.6% $696
Rezoning
Major Change (map change greater than 5 acres) $5,170 1.6% $5,253 See Notes 1, 2 Minor Change (map change 5 acres or less/or text amendment) $2,589 1.6% $2,630 See Notes 1, 2 Zone Clearnace $620
Zone Map Amendment $5,265 1.6% $5,350 See Notes 1, 2
Zone Text Amendment $5,099 1.6% $5,181 See Notes 1, 2
Land Division Applications
Variance
Zoning

1. More Complex projects require a consultant proposal for estimated cost.

2. Should a project require additional study, staff time, public hearings, or notification, then additional funds shall be deposited in an amount determined by the Director.

3. For Specific Plans, Negative Declarations, and EIRs prepared by qualified consultants under contract to the City, the fee shall be cost + 15%.

4. CEQA filing fees shall be as required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife website and shall include filing fees for the Fresno County Clerk. Checks in the required amount shall be deposited with the City prior to the final public hearing adopting the environmental document and shall be returned if the project is denied.

Notes:

5. After receiving two incomplete letters from City staff on a given project, applicants are required to pay 60% of the application fee for each resubmittal past receipt of the second incompleteness letter.

7. Hourly rates are set at $155, consistent with the hourly billing rate of the City Planner.

6. Applicants are required to pay an additional $300 for public noticing of each public hearing. 76 Section 10, Item 10B.

1. If an application is withdrawn or returned before it is deemed complete or within two weeks of submittal, whichever occurs first, then the applicant shall be entitled to a full refund.

2. If an application is withdrawn or returned after the initial period described above, but no later than six months after submittal and prior to scheduling for a earing or an administrative decision, then the applicant shall be refunded half of the application fees.

3. After six months from application submittal, or once an application has been scheduled for a public hearing or administrative decision, whichever occurs first, no refunds shall be given.

Refunds:
77 Section 10, Item 10B.

Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Institutional General Services $1,401 $981 $436 $131 $219
Law Enforcement $987 $691 $307 $92 $154
Fire Department $1,169 $818 $364 $109 $183
Water $2,805 $1,963 $874 $262 $437
Sewer $4,255 $2,978 $1,325 $398 $663
Storm Drain $5,531 $9,066 $11,752 $13,135 $11,752
Traffic $554 $585 $2,519 $321 $797
Ground Water Recharge $928 $650 $289 $86 $144
Park Development
Parks and Recreation
Facilities $4,122 $2,885
Quimby Act Fee $2,707 $2,707
Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Institutional General Services $1,379 $965 $429 $129 $215
Law Enforcement $972 $680 $302 $90 $152
Fire Department $1,151 $805 $358 $108 $180
Water $2,761 $1,932 $860 $258 $431
Sewer $4,188 $2,931 $1,304 $392 $652
Storm Drain $5,444 $8,923 $11,567 $12,928 $11,567
Traffic $546 $576 $2,480 $316 $785
Ground Water Recharge $914 $639 $284 $85 $142
Park Development
Parks and Recreation
Facilities $4,058 $2,839
Quimby Act Fee $2,665 $2,665
Land Use
Residential per Unit Non-Residential per 1,000 Square Feet Development Impact Fee Schedule (2025)
Exhibit "B"
Development Impact Fee Schedule (2024)
Residential per Unit
Land Use
Non-Residential per 1,000 Square Feet
* Denotes the fee is per acre, not per unit or per 1,000 sq ft. * * * * *
* * * * *
78 Section 10, Item 10B.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2025
FROM: MICHAEL REID, Police Chief
SUBJECT: APPROVE a Second Amendment in the amount of $195,160 to the agreement with Dewberry Architects, Inc., for a total amount of $876,168 for design, bidding and construction support costs for the David T. Cardenas Police Headquarters and Senior Center and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the amendment

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action provides for the approval of a second amendment to the City’s contract with Dewberry Architects, Inc. (“Dewberry”) for the David T. Cardenas Senior Center and Police Headquarters (“Project”). This proposed second amendment would expand the scope of the original agreement to include providing support to the bidding process, and for construction administration assistance. This work is different than services provided by Vanir Construction Management and relates specifically to the architecture and engineering of the Project.

Based on Council direction provided to staff at the December 17, 2024 City Council meeting, staff met with Dewberry and worked to prepare a revised scope of work.

BACKGROUND
Proposed Second Amendment
This revised scope of work provides for bidding and construction support costs such as responding to Requests for Information from subcontractors, approving submittals, approving shop drawings, and maintaining an as-built set of architectural drawings. Dewberry initially provided City staff a proposal based on a lump-sum fee. Staff requested this be changed to a time and materials basis.

Due to internal staffing changes within Dewberry, the City was not notified in a timely manner about the need for this Second Amendment. Dewberry and their subcontractors have continued to provide service in good faith as staff negotiated this proposed Second Amendment.

Background on Dewberry’s Scope of Work
In late 2021, the City solicited a request for qualifications for firms to provide police department, community center, and training center design and planning services. On February 1, 2022, the Fowler City Council approved a $530,376 agreement with Dewberry to design and 79 Section 10, Item 10C.
provide planning services for a police department, community center, and training center in Fowler.

Dewberry was able to develop elevations and exterior designs which were presented to residents, City Council, and Staff to determine the final design. On March 6, 2023, Dewberry presented these findings to the City Council and the craftsman design was approved.

On September 5, 2023, City Council approved the First Amendment to the Dewberry contract in the amount of $150,000 for additional design costs based on the scale of the Project. To reduce the cost of the First Amendment, bidding and construction support line items were also reallocated to design costs.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
At its May 30, 2024, special meeting, the Planning Commission determined the Project (Planning Application 24-04) is exempt from further environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and adopted a Class 32 [In-Fill Development Projects] categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines section 15332. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse for approval.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:

Goal CDES-1
Through community design, Fowler fosters and reinforces the City’s unique sense of place.

Goal CDES-3
Downtown Fowler is preserved and enhanced as the primary cultural and civic core of the community.

Policy CDES-10
Improvements to older buildings in the downtown area and throughout the City should enhance rather than weaken the original character of such buildings.

Policy CH-2
Promote walking and bicycling and reduce vehicle miles traveled by allowing complementary land uses in close proximity to one another. Goal OS-3 Recreational programming and facilities meet the needs of community members of all ages and abilities.

Policy OS-16
Ensure that community centers provide sufficient space to conduct civic meetings, recreational programs, and social activities to meet the needs of residents. The City should aim to meet the standard of one meeting room per 7,500 residents. Community centers should serve the needs of seniors; families with children; and teens. Locate a new Community Center within or adjacent to parks or downtown.
80 Section 10, Item 10C.

Goal PF-1
Fowler provides reliable public facilities, utilities, and community services that meet the needs of the existing community and planned growth.

Goal PF-2
Fowler maintains and manages the orderly and efficient expansion of public facilities, utilities, and community services.

General Plan Policy PF-8
Provide City departments with adequate office and building space for employee workspace and equipment storage.

General Plan Policy PF-10
Form proactive community partnerships that develop responsible ownership for public safety in Fowler, inform the public on how they can improve their personal safety; use a preventative approach that is issue-oriented; support innovative approaches to problem-solving; establish mutual trust and communication among Police Services staff and the community; and provide positive role models and values through activities in the neighborhoods and community as a whole.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project budget was approved at the October 14, 2024, City Council meeting. This included a contingency reserve. Staff will bring a Budget Amendment Resolution at a subsequent meeting.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Revised Second Amendment & Exhibit A
- Item 8i of the September 5, 2023 Agenda Packet
81 Section 10, Item 10C.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE POLICE HEADQUARTERS AND SENIOR CENTER DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2022
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOWLER AND DEWBERRY ARCHITECTS, INC.

A. The City of Fowler (“City”) desires modifications to the products and services beyond the scope of the Agreement between the City and Dewberry Architects, Inc. (“Consultant”) for the Design of the Police Headquarters and Senior Center project, dated February 3, 2022. (“Agreement”).

B. An additional scope of work as further described in EXHIBIT A, authorizes Consultant to provide bidding and construction administration support for the David T. Cardenas Senior Center & Police Headquarters project. EXHIBIT A shall become a substantive part of the Agreement.

C. The termination date for this 2nd Amendment to the Agreement will be December 31, 2026.

D. The total amount paid by the City to Dewberry Architects, Inc., as stated in Section 4 of the Agreement was listed as Five Hundred Thirty Thousand, Three Hundred Seventy-Six dollars ($530,376). On September 5, 2023, a First Amendment to the Agreement was executed. The First Amendment revised the total amount to be paid under the Agreement to Six hundred Eighty-One Thousand, and Eight dollars ($681,008).

E. The total cost of the additional services described in Exhibit A, are One Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand One Hundred Sixty Dollars ($195,160). The total amount to be paid pursuant to the Agreement is hereby revised to an amount not to exceed Eight Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars ($876,168).

F. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. It is the intention of the parties that except for the changes explicitly listed above, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and any other Exhibits, Attachments or Addenda thereto shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Second Amendment on January 21, 2025.

DEWBERRY ARCHITECTS, INC. CITY OF FOWLER
__________________________
Erica Nelles Thomas W. Gaffery IV
Senior Principal Interim City Manager
Date: Date:
1760 Creekside Oak Drive, Suite 280 Fowler, CA 93625
Sacramento, CA 95833 (559) 834-3113
ATTEST
_______________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
Date:
82 Section 10, Item 10C.
1 September 30, 2024 (Revised November 5, 2024) (Revised January 15, 2024) TO: Thomas Gaffery
Interim City Manager
[email protected]
CC: Michael S. Reid FBINA #272
Chief of Police
Fowler Police Department
[email protected]
RE: City of Fowler
David T. Cardenas Senior Center and Police Headquarters Change Order Request #2 – Bidding and Construction Administration Support Thank you for the opportunity to submit this change order request for the Bidding and Construction Administration Phases of the new David T. Cardenas Senior Center and Police Headquarters project.

BACKGROUND
During the contract negotiations with the City of Fowler, it was decided the Bidding and Construction Administration phases would be excluded from the primary contract and incorporated into the project with a change order. Below is a list of services included in the Bidding and Construction Administration phases.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Below is a list of services included in the Bidding and Construction Administration phases.

TASK: - BIDDING
Dewberry understands that City will administer the bidding process with their Construction Manager, Vanir, Inc.

Modifications to the scope of work and fee provided in the proposal on September 30, 2024 have been identified in red text below.

1. Dewberry will attend one pre-bid conference with City and selected General Contractor(s)

2. Respond in writing to Requests for Information (RFI)

3. Prepare Addendums as required.

TASK: - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION

1. Attend one pre-construction meeting (on-site).

2. Attend weekly monthly virtual OAC meetings.

3. Respond to RFI’s.

4. Review project submittals.

5. Perform up to (6) (2) Architectural site visits and (2) site visits for all other disciplines.

EXHIBIT A
83 Section 10, Item 10C.
2 6. Prepare punch-list in collaboration with the Construction Manager and General Contractor.

Assumptions:
• Construction will be completed within 18 months and commence immediately upon contract negotiations with the selected contractor.
• The city will engage a construction manager under a separate contract to provide construction management through project completion.

Exclusions:
• Additional meetings and/or site visits
• Changes to the approved design
• Extended construction schedule
FEE
We are requesting an adjustment to our original contract budget in the form of a change order for the additional fees we incurred to complete the Bidding Support phase and provide Construction Administration Support through construction.

The original proposed Time and Material Fee for Professional Services is: Two Hundred, Forty-Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred and Thirty-Nine dollars. ($249,839 and no cents).

The scope change identified in red results in a fee reduction of $10,560.

Per our discussion, a further fee reduction of $44,119 is included in the final proposed fee for professional services.

Proposed Fee (September 30, 2024) $249,839
Scope Reduction ($10,560)
Fee Reduction ($44,119)
Total Fee Proposed $195,160
The revised Time and Material Fee for Professional Services is: One hundred ninety-five thousand, one hundred and sixty dollars and no cents. ($195,160.00).

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the change order request.

Regards,
Dewberry Architects Inc.

Patricia Esposito
Associate Principal
Cc:
- File
- Erica Nelles, Senior Principal
84 Section 10, Item 10C.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2025
FROM: SOO HO PARK, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Actions pertaining to Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program projects:
i. REJECT all Donny Wright Park Shade Structure
Improvement Project construction bids due to bid amounts exceeding grant funding
ii. REJECT all Harris Park Improvement Project construction bids due to bid amounts exceeding grant funding

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Harris Park Improvement Project and the Donny Wright Park Shade Structure Improvement Project were competitively bid via PlanetBids. All bid responses significantly exceeded the available Proposition 68 grant funds.

Staff recommend rejecting all bids, revising the project scopes, self-performing portions of the work with City staff, and soliciting specialty contractors in compliance with the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (UPCCAA).

BACKGROUND
The City received Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program funds via the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 Harris Park Improvement Project and the Donny Wright Park Shade Structure Improvement Project.

On November 14, 2024, the City released a public works construction bid for the two projects.

On December 9, 2024, the City received three responsive bids for the Harris Park Improvement Project and one bid for the Donny Wright Park Shade Structure Improvement Project.
 Harris Park Improvements: The lowest responsive bidder was GCB1 Inc., d.b.a. GC Bilders, with a bid of $350,013.74.
 Donny Wright Park Shade Structure Improvements: The sole bidder was Pacific Tide Construction, with a bid of $177,961.41.

The engineer's estimate for Harris Park Improvements was $170,660, and the shade structure 85 Section 10, Item 10D.
at Donny Wright Park was estimated to cost approximately $50,000 (materials only). All bids received exceeded the respective estimates and available funding.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an agency must complete environmental review prior to committing itself to a definite course of action in regard to a proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15352). Environmental review must occur as early as feasible in the planning process to enable environmental considerations to influence project program and design, yet late enough to provide meaningful information for environmental assessment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15004(b)).

At this time, the City Council is not taking any action that would constitute approval of a Project.

The City Council retains full discretion either to approve or disapprove the project. The appropriation of funds for further study is therefore exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15262 (feasibility and planning studies for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded), as well as the general rule that CEQA only applies to “projects” that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Policy LU-23
Ensure that the location and design of all parks, recreation, and community centers are compatible with existing adjacent uses.

Goal CH-1
Opportunities for physical activity, such as walking and biking, are integrated into the built environment.

Goal CH-4
Public facilities are equitably distributed throughout the community.

Goal OS-2
Open space areas enhance community livability, provide opportunities for improved public health, and are equitably distributed throughout the City.

Policy OS-1
Parks shall be developed according to the park classifications, access radii, and service level requirements.

Goal OS-4
Open space acquisition, development, programming, and maintenance is adequately and reliably funded.
86 Section 10, Item 10D.

Policy ED-5
Discourage passive land uses, underutilization of land, and vacant structures on available commercial sites.

Policy ED-12
Support the development of civic amenities, including community entertainment venues, community events, and other opportunities that increase quality of life, visitation, and position Fowler as a center for recreation and entertainment in Fresno County.

Goal SAF-1
The community is resilient to the effects of a changing climate.

Goal PF-1
Fowler provides reliable public facilities, utilities, and community services that meet the needs of the existing community and planned growth.

Goal PF-2
Fowler maintains and manages the orderly and efficient expansion of public facilities, utilities, and community services.

FISCAL IMPACT
By rejecting all bids, and self-performing portions of the work with City staff, and soliciting specialty contractors in compliance with the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (UPCCAA), the City will incur a significant cost savings and be able to minimize the amount of City funds used to deliver these projects.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The project was competitively bid online via PlanetBids. This item is being brought for City Council consideration consistent with the Fowler Municipal Code and California Public Contracts Code.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Bid Summary - Harris Park Improvements
- Bid Summary - Donny Wright Park
87 Section 10, Item 10D.

Total Base Bid $177,961.41

CITY OF FOWLER - DONNY WRIGHT PARK SHADE STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS BID SUMMARY - 12/9/2024
#1
Pacific Tide Construction
Bid Schedule
88 Section 10, Item 10D.

Item No. Quantity Unit Item Description Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount
1 1 LS Mobilization/Demobilization, Bonds,
Insurance, and Permits $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $35,950.00 $35,950.00 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 2 1 LS Vehicle & Pedestrian Traffic Control $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 1 LS Site Clearing & Grubbing $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 4 1 LS Site Grading $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 5 90 SF Sawcut and Remove Existing AC Pavement $55.56 $5,000.40 $28.75 $2,587.50 $30.00 $2,700.00 6 58 SF Sawcut and Remove Existing Concrete $86.20 $4,999.60 $23.00 $1,334.00 $7.00 $406.00 7 90 SF Permanent Trench/ AC Resurfacing $277.80 $25,002.00 $92.00 $8,280.00 $100.00 $9,000.00 8 2 EA Sidewalk Underdrain $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $2,150.00 $4,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 9 1 EA Connection to Existing Water Main $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $36,200.00 $36,200.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 10 1 LS Landscaping & Irrigation $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $43,700.00 $43,700.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 11 297 LF Chain Link Privacy Fence $67.30 $19,988.10 $60.00 $17,820.00 $68.00 $20,196.00 12 5,501 SF Turf Play Areas $3.64 $20,023.64 $9.90 $54,459.90 $0.30 $1,650.30 13 1 EA Accessible Picnic Table $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $10,450.00 $10,450.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 14 1 EA Park Monument Sign $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $13,320.00 $13,320.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 15 1 EA Bench $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 16 1 EA Bike Rack $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $800.00 $800.00 17 1 EA Drinking Fountain with Bottle Fill $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 18 1 EA Dry Well $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 19 1 EA Dog Waste Station $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $900.00 $900.00 20 2 EA Trash Receptacle $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $11,275.00 $22,550.00 $2,300.00 $4,600.00 21 1 LS Site Electrical $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $172,000.00 $172,000.00 Total Base Bid
Total Alternate Bid
22 1,540 SF Concrete Flatwork $22.47 $34,603.80 $9.10 $14,014.00 $13.00 $20,020.00 23 9 LF Concrete Curb & Gutter $111.11 $999.99 $67.80 $610.20 $210.00 $1,890.00 24 100 LF Turf Perimeter Curb $16.50 $1,650.00 $32.40 $3,240.00 $61.00 $6,100.00 Total Alternate Bid

CITY OF FOWLER - HARRIS PARK IMPROVEMENTS
BID SUMMARY - 12/9/2024
#1 #3
GCB1 Inc. dba GC Builders
American Paving Co.
#2
Total Base Bid & Alternate Bid $387,267.53 $542,462.30
Harris Development Corp.
dba HBC Enterprises
$489,351.40
$17,864.20
$507,215.60
Bid Schedule
$350,013.74 $514,452.30
$37,253.79 $28,010.00
89 Section 10, Item 10D.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 21, 2024
FROM: ERIC ROCHA, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Actions pertaining to the 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7:
i. AWARD a construction contract to HPS Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $4,356,800 and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the agreement
ii. APPROVE a professional services agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group in the amount of $192,745 for construction management, observation, and inspection
services for the Project and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the agreement
iii. APPROVE Budget Resolution No. 2765 allocating funding for the Project

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action awards a construction contract to HPS Mechanical, Inc. for the 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (1,2,3-TCP) Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7 (“Project”). This action also approves a professional services agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group to provide construction management, observation, and inspection services relating to the Project.

BACKGROUND
On Auguster 15, 2018, the City received Compliance Order No. 03_23_18R_026 from the State Water Resources Control Board for a 1,2,3-TCP Maximum Contaminant Level Violation at Well No. 7. Following receipt of the Order, the City initiated a lawsuit against several companies responsible for the manufacture and distribution of 1,2,3-TCP. In February of 2021, this legal action resulted in a settlement with the City receiving $5,000,000 to fund its legal costs, land acquisition, design, environmental document preparation, and construction of the necessary treatment and removal of 1,2,3-TCP at Well No. 7.

On October 29, 2024, through a competitive bidding process, the City received two (2) responsive bids for the construction of the Project. The scope of work includes the installation of granular activated carbon (“GAC”) equipment at Well No. 7, along with transmission pipelines, on-site chlorination facilities, a storage basin, and an access road. The lowest responsive bid of $4,356,800 was submitted by HPS Mechanical, Inc. This is consistent with 90 Section 10, Item 10E.
the City Engineer’s project cost estimate of $4,264,340. HPS Mechanical, Inc., based in Bakersfield, California, holds current and active Class A and B contractor licenses in the State of California.

Additionally, to ensure effective oversight of the Project, the City solicited a proposal from Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group to provide construction management, observation, and inspection services from mobilization through punch list and close-out. This includes critical functions such as: serving as the City’s primary point of contact with the contractor, serving as the inspector of record, conducting regular construction progress meetings, maintaining records, assisting with technical reviews & RFIs, and providing construction observation with daily reports and photos. The fees for this scope are based on the City’s reduced fee schedule under the on-call City Engineering Services professional services agreement.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Council of the City of Fowler adopted Resolution No. 2705 on February 6, 2024, adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, finding that with the inclusion of mitigation measures the Project would not have a significant impact to the environment.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:

Policy SAF-14
Maintain the domestic water system in accordance with appliable water quality standards Policy PF-16
Design and construct water system infrastructure as needed to meet current and future water demands and system requirements.

SAF-14a
Monitor funding sources for improvements, if necessary, to maintain the domestic water system in accordance with applicable water quality standards.

FISCAL IMPACT
The current TCP fund balance is $3,942,089. The remaining anticipated project cost of $547,001 will be funded from water fund balances. Staff also continue to pursue other grant funding opportunities to potentially fund the remainder of the Project from non-City sources.

Staff will also pursue a deductive change order to reduce the cost of the access road. This is shown in the table below.
91 Section 10, Item 10E.

Spending Plan - 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7 Funding Source Fund 2024/25
TCP Settlement Fund 503 $ 3,894,921
TCP Interest Income 503 $ 47,168
Water Fund 500 $ 547,001
$ 4,489,090
Costs
Construction Contract (HPS) $ 4,356,800
Construction Management (P&P) $ 192,745
Geotechnical Inspection (estimate) $ 10,000
Design Costs (estimate, remaining) $ 39,545
Deductive Change Order for Access Road (estimate) $ (110,000) $ 4,489,090
5% Contingency
Water Fund $ 224,455

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The Project was competitively bid online via PlanetBids, with two (2) contractors submitting responsive bids. HPS Mechanical, Inc. was the lowest bidder responsible bidder and will serve as the general contractor responsible for the Project’s construction. This item is being brought for City Council consideration consistent with the Fowler Municipal Code and California Public Contracts Code.

Provost & Pritchard was selected through a competitive bid process for the design of the Project and therefore is the most qualified to oversee construction as both the design engineer of the project, and as the City Engineer. This item is being brought for City Council consideration consistent with the City’s Purchasing Policy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Project Plans
- Project Bid Summary
- Construction Contract
- Professional Services Agreement and Exhibits
- Budget Resolution No. 2765
92 Section 10, Item 10E.

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

COVER SHEET
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-1
1 41
6/17/2024 10:08 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-1 COVER SHEET.dwg -Alex Gong

SITE MAP

VICINITY MAP

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

BID SET
MAY 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.expressly reserves its common law copyright and otherapplicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form ormanner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a thirdparty without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost &Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing theserights.

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024

PROJECT LOCATION

TREATMENT SITE

LOCATION
WELL 7 SITE

LOCATION

CITY OF
FOWLER

SHEET INDEX
SHEET
NO.

SEQ.

SHEET
NO.

DESCRIPTION

GENERAL
G-1 1 COVER SHEET
G-2 2 LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
G-3
3 GENERAL NOTES
G-4 4 GENERAL NOTES
G-5 5 DESIGN CRITERIA
G-6
6 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS
G-7 7 HYDRAULIC PROFILE
CIVIL
C-1 8 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN
C-2 9 DEMOLITION PLAN
C-3 10 TREATMENT SITE PLAN
C-4 11 TREATMENT SITE GRADING PLAN
C-5 12 OVERALL PIPING PLAN
C-6 13 WELL CONNECTION SITE PIPING PLAN
C-7 14 TREATMENT SITE PIPING PLAN
C-8 15 TREATMENT SITE COORDINATES
C-9 16 VESSEL SLAB PLAN
C-10 17 PIPING SECTIONS

ROADWAY DESIGN
R-1 18 STA 10+00-14+00
R-2 19 STA 14+00-19+00
R-3 20 STA 19+00-22+90
R-4 21 CITY ROAD DETAILS

DETAILS
D-1 22 GAC DETAILS
D-2 23 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
D-3 24 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
D-4 25 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
D-5 26 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
D-6 27 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
D-7 28 CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS
D-8 29 CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS
D-9 30 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
D-10 31 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
D-11 32 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
D-12 33 CITY STANDARD DETAILS
D-13 34 CITY STANDARD DETAILS

ELECTRICAL
E0.1 35 OVERALL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
E1.0 36 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
E2.0 37 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULES
E2.1 38 PEDESTAL, RTU & PLC ELEVATIONS AND ELECTRICAL DETAILS E2.2 39 ELECTRICAL DETAILS
IO.01 40 ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
IO.02 41 PROCESS CONTROL TREATMENT PLANT

E WALTER AVE S LOCAN AVE

E ADAMS AVE

E SOUTH AVE

S TEMPERANCE AVE

GOLDEN STATE BLVD
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
93 Section 10, Item 10E.

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-2
2 41
6/17/2024 10:09 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-2 LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS.dwg -Alex Gong

AB AGGREGATE BASE

AC ASPHALT CONCRETE

ACP ASBESTOS-CEMENT PIPE

AD ALUMINUM DISK

AGG AGGREGATE

AH AHEAD

ALT ALTERNATE

AP ANGLE POINT

APPROX APPROXIMATE

APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ARV AIR RELIEF VALVE

ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS

AV AIR VENT

AVE AVENUE

AWWA AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION

BAR BARRIER

BC BEGIN CURVE

BD BRASS DISK

BFP BACKFLOW PREVENTER

BK BACK

BLDG BUILDING

BM BENCHMARK

BO BOLLARD

BTM BOTTOM

BVC BEGIN VERTICAL CURVATURE

BW BACK OF WALK

BWL BACK OF WALL

BWR BARB WIRE

C, CONC CONCRETE

CA CALIFORNIA

CAB CABINET

CBL CABLE

CFS CUBIC FEET PER SECOND

C&G CURB & GUTTER

CHK CHECK

CHLK CHAIN LINK

CI CAST IRON

CIP CAST IRON PIPE

CIPCP CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PIPE

CL CLASS

CLVT CULVERT
℄ CENTERLINE

CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE

CLR CLEAR, CLEARANCE

CMLC CEMENT MORTAR LINED & COATED

CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CN CONCRETE NAIL

CNS COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL

CO SEWER CLEAN OUT

CONT CONTINUOUS

CONST CONSTRUCT/CONSTRUCTION

COR CORNER

CORP CORPORATION

COL COLUMN

COUP COUPLING

CP CONTROL POINT

CR CROWN

CU CUBIC

CY CUBIC YARDS

DA DRIVE APPROACH

DEC DECIDUOUS

DEMO DEMOLISH/DEMOLITION

DI DROP INLET
DIA, Ø DIAMETER

DIM DIMENSION

DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE

D/S DOWNSTREAM

DW DRIVEWAY

DWG DRAWING
(E) EXISTING, EAST

EA EACH

EC END CURVE

ECC ECCENTRIC

EF EACH FACE

EG EXISTING GRADE

EL, ELEV ELEVATION

ELC EPOXY LINED & COATED

ELEC ELECTRIC

ELL ELBOW

EM ELECTRIC METER

EOL END OF LINE

EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT

EQUIV EQUIVALENT

ESMT EASEMENT

EUC EUCALYPTUS

EVC END VERTICAL CURVE

EW EACH WAY

EXP EXPOSED
(F) FUTURE

F&I FURNISH & INSTALL

FD FOUND

FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FF FINISHED FLOOR

FG FINISHED GRADE

FH FIRE HYDRANT
, FL FLOW LINE

FLG FLANGE

FLGD FLANGED

FM FORCE MAIN

FNC FENCE

FRP FIBER REINFORCED POLYESTER PIPE

FT FOOT/FEET

FW FRONT OF WALK

FWL FACE OF WALL

GA GAUGE

GAL GALLON

GALV GALVANIZED

GB GRADE BREAK

GM GAS METER

GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE

GRVL GRAVEL
GS GAS

GSV GAS VALVE

GUY GUY WIRE

GV GATE VALVE

HD HEAD

HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE

HDR HEADER

HDW HEADWALL

HGL HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

HORIZ HORIZONTAL

HP HINGE POINT, HIGH POINT, HORSEPOWER

HP GAS HIGH PRESSURE GAS

HPS HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH

HR HANDRAIL

H/T HUB & TACK

HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL

HYDRO HYDROPNEUMATIC

ID INSIDE DIAMETER

IN INCH

INV INVERT

IP IRON PIPE

IRR IRRIGATION

JP JUNCTION POLE

LBS POUNDS

LC LENGTH OF CURVE

LCW LONG CRESTED WEIR

LF LINEAR FEET

LG LONG

LT LEFT

LPG LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS

MAX MAXIMUM

MB MAILBOX

MCC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER

MFR MANUFACTURER

MH MANHOLE

MIN MINIMUM

MISC MISCELLANEOUS

MJ MECHANICAL JOINT

MN MAG NAIL

MP MEDIUM PRESSURE GAS LINE

MPT MALE PIPE THREAD

MRKR MARKER

MS MILD STEEL
(N) NORTH

NAVD NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM

NC NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED

NGVD NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM

NIC NOT IN CONTRACT

NPT NATIONAL PIPE THREAD

NTS NOT TO SCALE

OC ON CENTER

OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER

OH OVERHEAD

OP OPERATING

OSHA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

O&M OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
(P) PROPOSED

PB PULL BOX

PC POINT OF CURVATURE

PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

PCC PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

PE PERMANENT EASEMENT

PER PERIMETER

PI POINT OF INTERSECTION

PIP PLASTIC IRRIGATION PIPE

PLC PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
⅊ PROPERTY LINE

PNL PANEL

POC POINT ON CURVE

POL POINT ON LINE

POT POINT ON TANGENT

PP POWER POLE

PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE

PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT

PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PT POINT OF TANGENCY

PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

PVCC POINT OF VERTICAL COMPOUND CURVATURE

PVMT PAVEMENT

PVRC POINT OF VERTICAL REVERSE CURVATURE

PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION

R RADIUS

RBR REBAR

RC RADIUS OF CURVE

RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RD RELATIVE DENSITY

RD ROAD

RE REFERENCE

REQD REQUIRED

RET RETURN

REV REVISION

RGRCP RUBBER GASKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL

RP RADIUS POINT

RR RAILROAD

RT RIGHT

RTU REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT

R/W RIGHT OF WAY
(S) SOUTH, SOLVENT WELD
S SLIP
S= SLOPE

SCH SCHEDULE

SCP STANDARD CONCRETE PIPE

SD STORM DRAIN

SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SEC SECTION

SERV SERVICE

SF SQUARE FEET

SP SERVICE POLE

SPEC SPECIFICATION

SPNDL SPINDLE

SQ SQUARE

SS SANITARY SEWER

SS OR STS STAINLESS STEEL

SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STA STATION

STD STANDARD

STL STEEL

STP STAND PIPE

STRC STRUCTURE

STRP STRIPING

SWL SWALE

STWL STILLING WELL
(T) THREADED

T THREAD

T&B TOP & BOTTOM

TB TOP OF BANK

TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK

TC TOP OF CURB

TCE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

TDI TENSILE DUCTILE IRON

TELE TELEPHONE

TF TOP OF FOOTING

TFC TOP FACE OF CURB

TG TOP OF GRATE

TH THREAD

TL TOP OF LINING

TOE TOE OF SLOPE

TOP TOP OF SLOPE

TP TELEPHONE POLE

TR TELEPHONE RISER

TRANS TRANSFORMER

TRFC TRAFFIC

TS TOP OF STRUCTURE

TSB TELEPHONE SPLICE BOX

TYP TYPICAL

TWL TOP OF WALL

UG UNDERGROUND

UP UTILITY POLE

UT UTILITY

U/S UPSTREAM

VCP VERIFIED CLAY PIPE

VERT VERTICAL

VG VALLEY GUTTER

VLT VAULT

VLV VALVE
(W) WEST

W WATER

WL WATER LINE

WM WATER METER

WS WATER SERVICE

WV WATER VALVE

WW WASTE WATER

W/ WITH

W/O WITHOUT

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING

LINETYPE
NEW

DESCRIPTION

W WATER LEVEL
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
FL
o o
o o o o o o

I I I I I I
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
o o
o o o o o o
FL
□ □ □ □
x x x x
SF SF

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

GRADE BREAK

EMBANKMENT TOP

EMBANKMENT TOE
UTV
FM
SS
SD
W
UE UE
SD
SS
FM
OTV
UTV
OE
UT

IRR IRR
OT
OTV
OE
UCO
S I
FO
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

GRATING
SAND

RIP RAP
EARTH

CONCRETE LINING (PLAN VIEW)

CONCRETE

AC PAVEMENT

DESCRIPTION

EXPANDED METAL

LINETYPES SYMBOLS

EXISTING

HATCH TYPE
NEW
→ →

REVISION CLOUD

STATE/COUNTY/CORPORATE LIMIT

SECTION LINE

RELINQUISH ACCESS LINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

RESERVATION/PARK/FOREST

PROPERTY LINE

MEANDER LINE

EASEMENT

CENTERLINE
WATER

TELEVISION (BURIED LINE)

TELEVISION (AERIAL LINE)

TELEPHONE (BURIED)

TELEPHONE (AERIAL)

STORM DRAINAGE
STEAM

SIGNAL INTERCONNECT (BURIED)

SANITARY SEWER
OIL

IRRIGATION
GAS

SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN

FIBER-OPTIC

ELECTRIC (BURIED)

ELECTRIC (AERIAL)
COMPUTER/COMM. (BURIED)

WATER (MARSH/SWAMP)

WATER (LAKE/POND)

SWALE W/FLOW ARROWS

SWALE CENTERLINE

RETAINING WALL

RAILROAD

GUARDRAIL

GATE SWING

FENCE (SILT)

FENCE (WIRE)

FENCE (WOOD)

FENCE (CHAIN LINK)

FENCE (BLOCK WALL)

CONTOUR (MINOR)

CONTOUR (MAJOR)

CONTOUR (DEPRESSION)

BARRICADE

SECTION VIEW

SPOT ELEVATION

HIGH WATER LINE

EMBANKMENT ARROW

PIPE END

PIPE END (SCHEMATIC)

LINE BREAK

DETAIL CALLOUT

CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT

REVISION

FENCE GATE

FENCE POST

STILLING WELL

GATE VALVE HANDLE

BACK FLOW PREVENTOR

AIR RELIEF VALVE

BLOW-OFF

WATER VALVE
WELL

WATER METER

FIRE VAULT
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
3-NOZZLE HYDRANT
2-NOZZLE HYDRANT

TELEPHONE VAULT

TELEPHONE RISER

LOT NUMBER

OWNERSHIP TIE

MONUMENT

IRON PIPE

BENCH MARK

CONTROL POINT

GUARD POST

YARD LIGHT
SIGN

MAIL BOX

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN CULVERT

STORM DRAIN INLET

STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN

SSMH (ECCENTRIC CONE)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT

GAS VALVE

GAS METER

ELECTRIC MANHOLE

UTILITY POLE ANCHOR

UTILITY POLE

ELECTRIC VAULT

PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER

ELECTRIC METER

EXISTING NEW

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

SANITARY SEWER LATERAL

MONUMENT (OPTIONAL)

SAWCUT LINE

V V V V V V V
(E) XX XXX.XX XX XXX.XX

AGGREGATE

DEMO LINE

WORK LIMITS
E
E
SCO
S
D
T
FD
F
W
BFP
XX
X
XX
XXXX
HWL= XXX.XX

PIPE FITTINGS

FLANGED JOINT

MECHANICAL JOINT

ABOVE GRADE PIPE

BELOW GRADE PIPE
XX" C/C
XX" ELEC (AERIAL)
XX" ELEC (BURIED)
XX" FO
XX" GAS
XX" IRR
XX" SS
XX" FM
XX"
XX" SI
XX" SD
XX" TELE (AERIAL)
XX" TELE (BURIED)
XX" TV (AERIAL)
XX" TV (BURIED)
XX" W

SHEET NUMBER

DETAIL NUMBER
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
94 Section 10, Item 10E.

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

GENERAL NOTES
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-3
3 41
6/17/2024 10:09 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-3 GENERAL NOTES.dwg -Alex Gong

SPECIAL NOTE

WHERE UNDERGROUND AND SURFACE STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE

LOCATIONS, DEPTH AND DIMENSIONS OF STRUCTURES ARE BELIEVED TO BE REASONABLY CORRECT, BUT ARE NOT GUARANTEED. SUCH STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN FOR THE INFORMATION

OF THE CONTRACTOR, BUT INFORMATION SO GIVEN IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A

REPRESENTATION THAT SUCH STRUCTURES WILL, IN ALL CASES, BE FOUND WHERE SHOWN, OR THAT THEY REPRESENT ALL OF THE STRUCTURES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

SITE SAFETY AND PROTECTION NOTES

THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER, OWNER OR ITS AGENTS TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF

THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND THE UNDERTAKING OF INSPECTIONS OR THE GIVING OF

INSTRUCTIONS AS AUTHORIZED HEREIN IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE

ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION

SITE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUPERVISION OF THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION NOR

MAKE THE ENGINEER, OWNER OR ITS AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A SAFE PLACE FOR

THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS, OR SUPPLIERS, OR FOR ACCESS, VISITS, USE, WORK, TRAVEL OR OCCUPANCY BY ANY PERSON.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AT THE WORK SITE, COPIES OR SUITABLE EXTRACTS OF CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS, ISSUED BY CAL-OSHA. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THESE AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PROMULGATED BY THE SECRETARY OF LABOR UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT, AS SET FORTH IN TITLE 29 C.F.R.

TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND HEALTH OF CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES UNDER THE CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF THE "MANUAL OF ACCIDENT PREVENTION IN CONSTRUCTION" ISSUED BY THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., AND SHALL MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE RECORD OF ALL CASES

OF DEATH, OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE, AND INJURY REQUIRING MEDICAL ATTENTION OR CAUSING

LOSS OF TIME FROM WORK, ARISING OUT OF AND IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT OR WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT.

THE CONTRACTOR ALONE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY, EFFICIENCY, AND

ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S FACILITIES, APPLIANCES, AND METHODS AND FOR ANY DAMAGE,

WHICH MAY RESULT FROM THEIR FAILURE OR THEIR IMPROPER CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE OR OPERATION.

THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IT SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR

JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER, PROVOST & PRITCHARD

CONSULTING GROUP, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY,

REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT,

EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF OWNER, ENGINEER, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS.

THE OWNER AND ITS AGENTS' SITE RESPONSIBILITIES ARE LIMITED SOLELY TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THEIR EMPLOYEES ON SITE. THESE RESPONSIBILITIES SHALL NOT BE INFERRED BY ANY PARTY TO MEAN THAT THE OWNER OR ITS AGENTS HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITE SAFETY.

SAFETY IN, ON, OR ABOUT THE SITE IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR ALONE. THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF WORK PERFORMANCE,

SUPERINTENDENCE AND THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES, AND SEQUENCING OF

CONSTRUCTION ARE ALSO THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR ALONE.

GENERAL NOTES

1. THE CITY OF FOWLER SHALL BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ON OR NEAR EXISTING CITY FACILITIES.

2. USED MATERIAL, REJECTS, MISFITS, OR SECONDS, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON CITY FACILITIES.

3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS, PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY SPECIFICATIONS.

4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING FACILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) AT 8-1-1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ENGINEER AWARE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.

5. ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE FORMED INSIDE AND OUT AND

CONCRETE VIBRATED SUFFICIENTLY TO PROVIDE FOR SMOOTH SURFACED WALLS/FLOORS WITHOUT VOIDS AND HONEYCOMBS.

6. THE CITY SHALL INSPECT ALL WORK PHASES ON CONCRETE FACILITIES FOR CONFORMANCE TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS. REINFORCING SHALL NOT BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE WITHOUT PRIOR CITY INSPECTIONS. LIKEWISE, CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE COVERED WITH EARTH PRIOR TO CITY INSPECTION.

7. CONCRETE DESIGN MIX SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A 28-DAY MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

8. ALL NUTS, BOLTS, AND WASHERS USED TO SECURE UNDERGROUND FITTINGS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. AFTER INSTALLATION, ALL STEEL HARDWARE SHALL BE COATED WITH A RUST PREVENTATIVE, WRAPPED WITH 4 MIL POLYETHYLENE SHEETING, AND SECURE WITH PVC TAPE.

9. THRUST RESTRAINTS TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL PIPELINE BENDS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

10. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE HEALTH AND SAFETY LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CAL/OSHA STANDARDS.

11. TRENCH BACKFILL AND RESERVOIR EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CONTAINED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.

12. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF ALL PIPELINE CRACKS, WHICH DEVELOP DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AFFECTING EXISTING FACILITIES.

13. CONCRETE VAULTS AND BOXES MAY BE PURCHASED FROM A PRECAST MANUFACTURER

OR CONTRACTOR MAY CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURES IF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.

14. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL AND/OR DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION.

15. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE DUST CONTROL AT ALL TIMES.

DEMOLITION

1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS, ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR.

PIPING

1. PIPE MATERIALS
a) ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPING WITHIN THE SITE PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATION 40 05 00 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. b) ALL ABOVE GRADE PIPING 4 INCHES AND LARGER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON OR WELDED STEEL PIPE WITH FLANGED OR GROOVED CONNECTIONS CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATION 40 05 00 UNLESS

OTHERWISE NOTED
c) ALL STORM DRAIN PIPING WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE ASTM C76 CLASS 3 RUBBER GASKETED PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
d) ALL SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE PIPING SHALL BE 1/2-INCH POLYETHYLENE TUBING INSIDE OF EPVC CONDUIT CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATION 40 05 00 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. e) ON-SITE DRAIN PIPING SHALL BE ASTM D 3034, SDR 35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

2. RESTRAIN ALL ON-SITE PRESSURE PIPING AND TRASMISSION MAINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION 40 05 00, PARAGRAPH 3.5. THRUST BLOCKS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.

3. ALL BURIED PIPE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER

4. ALL VALVES WHICH IN THE OPEN POSITION WOULD ALLOW UNTREATED WATER TO BYPASS THE TREATMENT PROCESS (GAC VESSELS) SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOCKOUT DEVICE:
a) BURIED GATE VALVES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOCKING DEBRIS CAP. SW SERVICES LOCKING DEBRIS CAP OR EQUAL.
b) ABOVE-GRADE VALVE HANDWHEELS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOCKOUT DEVICE. ULINE, BRADY LOCKING COVER OR EQUAL.
c) LOCKOUT DEVICE LABELS SHALL STATE “CONTACT THE CITY OF FOWLER WATER DIVISION PRIOR TO OPENING THIS VALVE”.

5. THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 22 SECTION 64572 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS. REFER TO WATER MAIN SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-5.

6. ALL ABOVE GRADE PIPE SHALL BE PAINTED WITH THE COATING SYSTEM SPECIFIED IN SECTION 09 90 00 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. PIPE COLOR SHALL BE AS SELECTED BY THE OWNER.

7. ALL HARDWARE FOR BURIED PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL REGARDLESS OF TYPE (RESTRAINED MJ, FLANGE, ETC.).

8. NEW WATER MAINS, GAC VESSELS, TANKS, AND TREATMENT EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO BEING PLACED INTO SERVICE.

GRADING

1. THE WORK EMBRACED HEREIN SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 33 OF 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED.

2. THE WORK EMBRACED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE COMMENCED UNTIL THE OWNER OF THE

PROPERTY OR THE CONTRACTOR HAS FIRST BEEN PROVIDED AN INQUIRY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR SUB—SURFACE INSTALLATIONS AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE.

3. A GRADING PERMIT OR VOUCHER SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF FOWLER PRIOR TO ANY GRADING AND PAVING WORK FOR THIS PROJECT.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM ANY PROPERTY OWNER

GIVING HIM PERMISSION TO ENTER HIS PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING THE IMPROVEMENTS DELINEATED ON THE PLANS AND TRANSITIONS THERETO.

5. ANY DIRT OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO ANY EXISTING ROAD FROM THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CLEANED OFF AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY.

6. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY AUTHORITIES

OR UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING POSSIBLE INTEREST IN THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR'S

INTENTION TO EXCAVATE PROXIMATE TO EXISTING FACILITIES AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY UTILITIES IN THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY U.S.A. TWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION.

7. PROVIDE THE CITY OF FOWLER WITH "AS BUILT" PLANS UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING

8. ANY VERTICAL CUT OR FILL DIFFERENTIAL EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN TWELVE (12)

INCHES BETWEEN ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY AN APPROVED RETAINING WALL.

9. DIFFERENTIALS LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES ARE TO HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF ONE (1) VERTICAL TO TWO (2) HORIZONTAL.

10. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ORGANIC MATTER, DEBRIS, AND OTHER

DELETERIOUS OR EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF AT AN APPROVED LOCATION.

11. ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS WITHIN THE AREA OF WORK SHALL BE PRESERVED OR RESET BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR.

12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR DUST CONTROL FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE FULLY AND ADEQUATELY

CARRIED OUT ON WEEKDAYS, WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, AND WHEN NECESSARY, BEFORE OR AFTER NORMAL WORKING HOURS.

13. PRIOR TO THE LAYING OF THE SUB BASE OR BASE ON THE ROADWAY, THE CITY'S

ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE SUB GRADE ELEVATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.

14. ALL SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND UTILITY MANHOLES AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE AS NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THIS WORK.

ALL WATER MAIN VALVES (CAP AND LID) SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE AS NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THIS WORK.

15. THE COSTS OF ALL REPEAT TESTING REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE OF WORK SHALL BE FULLY BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.

16. PERMANENT TRENCH RESURFACING TO BE PER CITY STANDARD, OR AS DETAILED.

17. TEMPORARY TRENCH RESURFACING TO BE A MINIMUM 4" THICK COLD MIX.

18. TRENCH CUTS IN EXISTING STREETS THAT ARE NOT TO BE RECONSTRUCTED OR OVERLAID SHALL HAVE PERMANENT TRENCH RESURFACING INSTALLED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER INITIAL STREET CUT.

DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER NOTES

1. ALL CHEMICALS USED IN THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CHLORINE, SHALL BE CERTIFIED UNDER NSF/ANSI STANDARD 60.

2. ALL MATERIALS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH THE WATER SHALL BE LEAD-FREE AND UNDER NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 TO DEMONSTRATE THE MATERIAL DOES NOT LEACH ANY CONTAMINANTS INTO THE DRINKING WATER.

PIPING SCHEDULE

PROCESS

ABBREVIATIONS

SERVICE LOCATION CLASSIFICATION
PIPE

MATERIAL

THICKNESS/

PRESSURE CLASS

RESTRAINED
JOINTS

JOINTS/

FITTINGS
TEST

PRESSURE

TEST METHOD LINING COATING
INF GAC INFLUENT EXPOSED PRESSURE WSP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 FBE FBE EXPOSED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM EP BURIED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED PO or MJ 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM BSC, PEE EFF GAC EFFLUENT EXPOSED PRESSURE WSP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 FBE FBE EXPOSED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM EP BURIED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED PO or MJ 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM BSC, PEE BW GAC BACKWASH EXPOSED PRESSURE WSP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 FBE FBE EXPOSED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED FLG or GE 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM EP BURIED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED PO or MJ 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM BSC, PEE SD STORM DRAIN BURIED GRAVITY PVCG PER §40 05 00 UNRESTRAINED PO or MJ 3 PSI PER §40 05 00 - - PW POTABLE WATER BURIED PRESSURE DIP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED PO or MJ 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 CM BSC, PEE BURIED PRESSURE C900 PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED PO or MJ 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 - - UW UTILITY WATER BURIED PRESSURE PE TUBING PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED COMP 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 - - EXPOSED PRESSURE GSP PER §40 05 00 RESTRAINED THRD 100 PSI PER §40 05 00 - PER §09 90 00 C900 AWWA C900 STANDARD

DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE

GSP GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE

PE POLYETHYLENE

PVCG POLYVINYL CHLORIDE GRAVITY

WSP WELDED STEEL PIPE

COMP COMPRESSION

FLG FLANGE

GE GROOVED END

MJ MECHANICAL JOINT

PO PUSH ON JOINT

THRD THREADED

BSC BITUMINOUS SEAL COATED
PER AWWA C105

CM CEMENT MORTAR PER AWWA
C104

EP EPOXY POLYURETHANE
§09 90 00 SYSTEM 2

FBE FUSION BONDED EPOXY
§09 97 61

PEE POLYETHYLENE ENCASEMENT
§40 05 00 PER AWWA C105

CONCRETE NOTES

1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONSISTING OF TYPE II/V PORTLAND CEMENT, FINE AGGREGATE, COARSE AGGREGATE, WATER, AND SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES ±1 INCH). THE

CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN ONE AND ONE-HALF HOURS FROM THE TIME WATER IS INTRODUCED TO YIELD AT 28 DAYS A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WITH AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY (IF NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) AS FOLLOWS:

PAVING, EXTERIOR SLABS, AND SIDEWALKS 2,500 PSI, F0, S1, W1, C1 STRUCTURAL FOOTINGS AND INTERIOR SLABS 3,000 PSI, F0, S1, W1, C1

WALLS, BEAMS AND COLUMNS WHERE
THERE IS HUMAN OCCUPANCY 4,000 PSI, F0, S0, W0, C0

BUILDINGS FOR AG OCCUPANCY ONLY
(I.E. COMMODITY BARN) 3,000 PSI, F0, S1, W1, C1
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE:

EXPOSED TO SEWAGE/MANURE 4,500 PSI, F0, S1, W2, C1
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR [CHECK] STRUCTURE 4,000 PSI, F0, S0, W2, C1 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 4,000 PSI, F0, S0, W0, C0

2. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 318 (LATEST EDITION).

3. CONCRETE MIXING SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C94.

4. SUBMIT CONCRETE LIFT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND OTHER

TYPES OF JOINTS OTHER THAN SPECIFIED OR SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS FOR FAVORABLE REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE START OF WORK ON FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL OR PLACING CONCRETE. ANY

ADDITIONAL VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL HAVE A STANDARD KEYWAY AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND TYPICAL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE ROUGHENED TO 1/4" AMPLITUDE.

5. OPENINGS, PIPE SLEEVES, CONDUITS, INSERTS, AND OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS SHALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE CONCRETE IS PLACED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE

ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, LANDSCAPING, HVAC, PLUMBING, INSTRUMENTATION,

AND OTHER PLANS FOR ITEMS REQUIRING SLEEVES AND EMBEDMENTS IN CONCRETE WHICH ARE NOT INDICATED OR SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. NO PIPES OR SLEEVES SHALL PASS THROUGH STRUCTURAL MEMBERS UNLESS SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE WITH EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S DRAWNIGS FOR ANCHORING DEVICES.

6. CONCRETE SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM PREMATURE DRYING FOR A CURING PERIOD OF AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER IT IS PLACED. EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE KEPT CONTINUOUSLY MOIST FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD. IN LIEU OF WATER CURING, THE CONCRETE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SPRAYING WITH A [NSF] APPROVED CURING COMPOUND. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE KEPT MOIST UNTIL THE COMPOUND IS APPLIED.

7. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED NO GREATER THAN 3X SLAB THICKNESS IN FEET NOR 20 FEET APART IN BOTH DIRECTIONS WITHIN 8 HOURS OF THE CONCRETE PLACEMENT ON ALL CONCRETE SLABS.

PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN UNREINFORCED SLABS PER PCA GUIDELINES.

8. ALL EXTERIOR SLABS SHALL BE SLOPED TO ALLOW DRAINAGE OF RUNOFF WATER TO PREVENT PONDING.

9. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH.

INTERIOR FLOORS AND EXTERIOR SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE TOOLED 3/8 INCH RADIUS CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.

10. ALL SLABS SHALL HAVE A TOWELED FINISH WITH A FF=35 AND A FL=25 MINIMUM UNO.

GROUT STRENGTH
f'm

SPECIFIED
MIN. STRENGTH

OF MASONRY
UNIT
GROUT

STRENGTH
@ 7 DAYS
MIN. GROUT

STRENGTH
@ 28 DAYS
2000 PSI 2000 PSI 1250 PSI 2000 PSI
2000 PSI 2800 PSI 1800 PSI 2800 PSI
2500 PSI 3750 PSI 2000 PSI 3750 PSI

REINFORCED HOLLOW-UNIT CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY NOTES
A. ALL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE OF GROUTED, REINFORCED, CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS WITH f'm AS LISTED BELOW. REFER TO THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR OTHER RELATED INFORMATION.

B. ALL MASONRY WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2022 CBC, TMS 402-2016, AND TMS 602-2016.

C. SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY AN INDEPENDENT INSPECTION AGENCY CERTIFIED FOR MASONRY INSPECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH TMS 602 LEVEL 2 SPECIAL INSPECTION TABLE 4.

D. MATERIALS:

1. PORTLAND CEMENT' ASTM C150 TYPE I OR II, LOW ALKALI.

2. AGGREGATE: MORTAR SAND - ASTM C144; GROUT SAND - ASTM C404,

3. HYDRATED LIME: ASTM C207, TYPE S.

4. ADMIXTURES: ONLY AS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT.

5. CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY UNITS: ASTM C90, (MIN. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS INDICATED IN SCHEDULE BELOW BY UNIT STRENGTH METHOD) WITH MAXIMUM .065% LINEAR SHRINKAGE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH C.M.A. STANDARDS.

6. REINFORCING MATERIALS: ASTM A615, GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS.

WELDED REBAR: ASTM A706 (WHERE REQ'D PER PLANS AND DETAILS) SEE "MASONRY LAP SPLICES" FOR TYP REBAR LAP REQUIREMENTS.

E. MORTAR:

1. ASTM C270 STRENGTH TYPE S, 1200 psi @ 7 DAYS AND 1800 psi @ 28 DAYS FOR LABORATORY PREPARED SAMPLES, 1500 psi @ 28 DAYS FOR FIELD TEST SPECIMENS. FIELD

SAMPLES SHALL BE USED TO VERIFY CONSISTENCY OF MATERIALS AND PROCEDURES ONLY.

F. GROUT:

1. STRENGTH: AS REQUIRED PER SCHEDULE LISTED BELOW.

2. COMPOSITION: GROUT SHALL BE PROPORTIONED FOR "COARSE GROUT" PER ASTM C476-02, AND CBC 2103.3.

G. MASONRY MATERIALS SHALL BE TESTED BY THE "UNIT STRENGTH METHOD" (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). "PRISM TEST METHOD" IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE WITHOUT WRITTEN DIRECTIVE FROM THE ARCHITECT WITH BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL.

H. GROUTING PROCEDURES SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY TMS 402/602 -16, AND AS FOLLOWS:

1. THE TOTAL GROUT POUR SHALL NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF TMS 402-16 -TABLE

3.2.1, IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 5'-4".

2. CLEANOUTS: PROVIDE CLEANOUT OPENINGS AT THE BOTTOM COURSE OF A REINFORCED CELL FOR EACH POUR EXCEEDING 5'-4", NOT EXCEEDING 32" o.c. THE COURSE AT THE

BOTTOM OF THE POUR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ENTIRELY OF INVERTED OPEN-END BOND BEAM UNITS. THE OPENINGS SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO THE LAYING OF MASONRY UNITS

AND BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE AND LOCATION TO ALLOW THOROUGH REMOVAL OF MORTAR DROPPINGS AND/OR DEBRIS. AFTER THE LAYING OF MASONRY UNITS IS COMPLETED, THE

CELLS CLEANED, THE REINFORCING STEEL POSITIONED, AND THE INSPECTION COMPLETED,

CLOSE THE CLEANOUTS BY INSERTING FACE SHELLS OF MASONRY UNITS OR COVERING THE OPENINGS WITH FORMS. FACE SHELL PLUGS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY BRACED TO RESIST THE HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE EXERTED BY THE GROUT.

I. ALL GROUT SHALL BE VIBRATED IN PLACE WITH A MECHANICAL VIBRATOR DESIGNED FOR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION AND USED BY EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL.

J. CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE DRY AND CLEAN BEFORE GROUTING OPERATION.

DO NOT PRE-WET MASONRY PRIOR TO GROUTING.

K. ALL MASONRY SHALL BE "RUNNING BOND" CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

WHERE MASONRY "STACKED BOND" CONSTRUCTION IS SPECIFIED USE OPEN-END UNITS SO THAT ALL HEAD JOINTS ARE MADE SOLID. USE BOND BEAM UNITS TO FACILITATE THE FLOW OF GROUT.

ALL UNITS SHALL BE GROUTED SOLID.

L. CONTROL JOINTS (C.J.) SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WALLS IN EXCESS OF 24 FEET LONG. JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 24'oc MAX UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS. JOINT LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO POURING WALL FOOTINGS.

JOINTS SHALL BE AS DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS.

M. CONDUITS AND PIPES:

1. CONDUITS SHALL BE ALLOWED IN CELLS FOR VERTICAL RUNS ONLY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS. NO HORIZONTAL RUNS ARE ALLOWED EXCEPT THAT VERTICAL OFFSETS BETWEEN ADJACENT CELLS WILL BE ALLOWED, UP TO 24" IN LENGTH,

TO AVOID INTERFERENCE AND CONGESTION WITH REINFORCING STEEL AND OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS.

WATER, GAS AND OTHER PIPES MAY PENETRATE THROUGH A WALL IN A SLEEVE, BUT SHALL NOT BE EMBEDDED IN WALLS.

2. REINFORCED CELLS: LIMIT CONDUIT TO ONE 3
4" DIAMETER CONDUIT PER CELL, PROVIDED
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MAINTAINED:
· REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PROPERLY PLACED AND SHALL NOT BE RELOCATED TO ACCOMMODATE CONDUITS.
· GROUT COVER BETWEEN CONDUIT AND REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE 2.5 x BAR DIAMETER, 11
2" MIN. (112" AT #5 BARS, 178" AT #6 BARS).
· MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CLEAR AREA WITHIN THE CELL FOR GROUT CLEARANCE AND CONSOLIDATION BY VIBRATION.

3. UNREINFORCED CELLS: LIMIT CONDUIT TO TWO 3
4" DIAMETER CONDUIT PER CELL, OR ONE
1 1
2" DIAMETER CONDUIT PER CELL, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MAINTAINED:
· CONDUIT SHALL NOT BE PLACED CLOSER THAN 3 x DIAMETER, CENTER TO CENTER, TO ADJACENT CONDUIT.
· MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CLEAR AREA WITHIN THE CELL FOR GROUT CLEARANCE AND CONSOLIDATION BY VIBRATION.

4. NO CONDUITS ARE ALLOWED IN WALLS LESS THAN 8" NOMINAL THICKNESS.

COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
95 Section 10, Item 10E.

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

GENERAL NOTES
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-4
4 41
6/17/2024 10:09 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-4 GENERAL NOTES.dwg -Alex Gong

NAILING SHEDULE

UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE, NAILING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE, USING ONLY COMMON WIRE NAILS. NAILING NOT NOTED BELOW OR ON PLANS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2 NAILS AT EACH CONTACT, 8d FOR 1" MATERIAL AND 16d FOR 2" MATERIAL.

NAILS SHALL ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM PENETRATION SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE BELOW. NAILS

SHALL NOT BE DRIVEN CLOSER TOGETHER THAN THE MINIMUM SPACING NOR CLOSER TO THE MEMBERS END OR EDGE THAN 1/2 THE MINIMUM SPACING. HOLES SHALL BE BORED WHERE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SPLITTING.

COMMON WIRE NAIL PROPERTIES
SIZE WIRE GAGE MINIMUM PENETRATION* AND

SPACING
6d 11-1/2 0.94"
8d 10-1/4 1.09"
10d 9 1.26"
16d 8 1.41"
20d 6 1.78"
* PENETRATION INTO THE PIECE RECEIVING THE POINT

WHERE POSSIBLE, NAILS DRIVEN PERPENDICULAR TO THE GRAIN SHALL BE USED INSTEAD OF TOENAILS.

FOR CONDITIONS NOT LISTED, REFER TO TABLE 2304.10.2 OF THE C.B.C., 2022 EDITION.

NAILING SCHEDULE

DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING ELEMENTS NUMBER OF

COMMON NAILS SPACING AND LOCATION
1 BLOCKING BETWEEN CEILING JOISTS,

RAFTERS OR TRUSSES TO TOP PLATE

OR OTHER FRAMING BELOW
3-8d EA END, TOENAIL

BLOCKING BETWEEN RAFERS OR

TRUSS NOT AT THE WALL TOP PLATE,

TO RAFTER OR TRUSS
2-8d
2-16d

EA END, TOENAIL

END NAIL
FLAT BLOCKING TO TRUSS 16d @ 6" OC FACE NAIL
2 CEILING JOISTS TO TOP PLATE 3-8d EA JOIST, TOENAIL
3 CEILING JOISTS NOT ATTACHED TO

PARALLEL RAFTER, LAPS OVER

PARTITION
3-16d FACE NAIL
4 CEILING JOIST ATTACHED TO

PARALLEL RAFTER

PER TABLE
2308.7.3.1 FACE NAIL
5 COLLAR TIE TO RAFTER 3-10d FACE NAIL
6 RAFTER OR ROOF TRUSS TO TOP
PLATE 3-10d TOENAIL
7 ROOF RAFTERS TO RIDGE VALLEY OR

HIP RAFTERS
2-16d
3-10d

END NAIL

TOENAIL
8 STUD TO STUD (NOT AT BRACED WALL

PANELS)
16d
10d
24" OC FACE NAIL
16" OC FACE NAIL
9 STUD TO STUD AND ABUTTING STUDS

AT CORNERS (AT BRACED WALL

PANELS)
16d 16" OC FACE NAIL
10 BUILT-UP HEADER (2" TO X") 16d 16" OC EA EDGE, FACE
NAIL
11 CONTINUOUS HEADER TO STUD 4-8d TOENAIL
12 TOP PLATE TO TOP PLATE 16d 16" OC FACE NAIL
13 TOP PLATE TO TOP PLATE AT END
JOINTS 8-16d EA SIDE OF END JT,FACE NAIL
14 BOTTOM PLATE TO JOIST, RIM JOIST,

BAND JOIST OR BLOCKING AT WALL
PANELS
16d 12" OC FACE NAIL
15 BOTTOM PLATE TO JOIST, RIM JOIST,

BAND JOIST OR BLOCKING AT WALL
PANELS
2-16d 16" OC FACE NAIL
16 STUD TO TOP OR BOTTOM PLATE 4-8d
2-16d

TOENAIL

END NAIL
17 TOP PLATES, LAPS AT CORNERS AND
INTERSECTIONS 2-16d FACE NAIL
18 1" BRACE TO EA STUD AND PLATE 2-8d FACE NAIL
19 1"x6" SHEATHING TO EA BEARING 2-8d FACE NAIL
20 1"x8" AND WIDER SHEATHING TO EA
BEARING 3-8d FACE NAIL
21 JOIST TO SILL, TOP PLATE OR GIRDER 3-8d TOENAIL
22 RIM JOIST, BAND JOIST OR BLOCKING

TO TOP PLATE, SILL OR OTHER

FRAMING BELOW
8d 6" OC, TOENAIL
23 1"x6" SUBFLOOR OR LESS TO EA JOIST 2-8d FACE NAIL
24 2" SUBFLOOR TO JOIST OR GIRDER 2-16d FACE NAIL
25 2" PLANKS (PLANK & BEAM - FLOOR &
ROOF) 2-16d EA BEARING, FACE NAIL
26 BUILT-UP GIRDERS AND BEAMS, 2"
LAYERS
20d AND
2-20d
32" OC FACE NAIL AT

TOP AND BOTTOM,
STAGGERED.

AT ENDS, AND AT EA

SPLICE FACE NAIL
27 LEDGER STRIP SUPPORTING JOISTS
OR RAFTERS 3-16d EA JOIST OR RAFTER,FACE NAIL
28 JOIST TO BAND JOIST OR RIM JOIST 3-16d END NAIL
29 BRIDGING OR BLOCKING TO JOIST,
RAFTER OR TRUSS 2-8d EA END, TOENAIL
30 SHEATHING 1/2" TO FRAMING 6d 6" EDGE, 12" OTHER

SUPPORTS
31 SHEATHING 3/4" TO FRAMING 8d 6" EDGE, 12" OTHER

SUPPORTS
32 SHEATHING 1-1/4" TO FRAMING 10d 6" EDGE, 12" OTHER

SUPPORTS

LOADING CRITERIA

1. MINIMUM LOADING REQUIREMENTS PER CBC 2022

2. DEAD LOAD:

FLOOR __NA__________
ROOF __10 PSF_______

3. COLLATERAL & EQUIPMENT LOADS __VARIES______
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT __VARIES______

4. LIVE LOADS: _______________
SIDEWALKS & DRIVEWAYS __100 PSF______
UNRESTRICTED VEHICULAR ACCESS __250 PSF______
ELEVATED FLOOR - UNIFORM __NA__________
- CONCENTRATED __NA__________
- IMPACT __NA___________
ROOF __20 PSF_____

5. GROUND SNOW LOAD, Pg __NA___________

6. RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDING: __III__________

7. WIND LOAD:

RISK CATEGORY __III ___________
ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED __101 MPH ____
EXPOSURE __C____________
INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT __-0.8__________

COMPONENTS & CLADDING
DESIGN WIND PRESSURE __17 PSF (WALL)_
FLOOR __N/A__________
ROOF __19 PSF _____

8. SEISMIC LOAD:

RISK CATEGORY __III __________
SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION Ss __0.593________
SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION S1 __0.229________
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS SDS __0.524________
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENT SD1 __0.327________
SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR ls __1.25_________
SITE CLASS __D____________
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY __D____________
SEISMIC FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM __CANT COL_____
DESIGN BASE SHEAR __VARIES_______
SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT Cs __VARIES __
RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR R __VARIES ____
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE __ELF__________

9. WATER LOAD:

DESIGN HIGH WATER LEVEL __N/A__________

10. FLOOD DESIGN DATA:

FIRM MAP N0. & COUNTY DESIGNATION __06019C2143H _
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION __X____________
FLOOD ELEVATION __N/A__________
FLOOD DESIGN CLASS __N/A__________
LOWEST FLOOD ELEVATION __N/A ________
DRY FLOODPROOFED ELEVATION __N/A__________

11. EARTH LOADS:

ACTIVE EFP __32 PCF_______
AT-REST EFP __50 PCF_______
PASSIVE EFP __440 PCF______
DESIGN LOAD BEARING VALUES __2,000 PSF____

12. RAIN LOADS __N/A__________
RAIN INTENSITY __N/A__________

SOIL AND FOUNDATION NOTES

1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BEAR UPON AND/OR PENETRATE INTO PROPERLY COMPACTED FILL WHICH SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM IN-PLACE DENSITY OF 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AT THE PROJECT SITE. IN CASE OF

EXPANSIVE CLAY SOIL CONDITIONS, THE OWNER MUST CONSULT WITH A GEOTECHNICAL

ENGINEER AND THE FOUNDATION PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.

2. FOUNDATION WORK TO BE DONE PER 2022 CBC, CHAPTER 18.

3. THE SOILS IN FOWLER ARE GENERALLY CLASSIFED AS "SILTY SAND".

4. ENGINEERING DESIGN OF FOUNDATION IS BASED ON:

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT TITLED: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION REPORT PROPOSED TCP TREATMENT FACILITIES - WELL 7 FOWLER, CALIFORNIA , BSK PROJECT G21-201-11F
DATE WHEN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS PREPARED:JUNE 30, 2022 NAME OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING COMPANY: BSK ASSOCIATES PHONE NUMBER OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: (559) 497-2880

5. ENGINEERING DESIGN OF FOUNDATION IS BASED ON:
a) ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 2,000 PSF FOR DEAD AND LIVE LOADS AND 2,667 PSF FOR WIND AND SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS
b) EXPANSION INDEX NOT GREATER THAN 20;
c) ALLOWABLE SOIL FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF 0.70;

SHOULD THE ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS NOT BE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ABOVE, NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY.

6. NOTIFY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR INSTRUCTIONS PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK

SHOULD ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS BECOME APPARENT DURING GRADING OR FOUNDATION EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

7. SOIL SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS FOR ALL FOUNDATIONS.

8. ALL FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE.

STEEL NOTES

1. ALL EXPOSED STEEL SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED OR PAINTED AS SPECIFIED IN SPECIFICATION 09 90 00.

2. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE:
a. STRUCTURAL SHAPES M, S, HP, C, MC, L, AS PER AISC MANUAL LATEST EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A36 (Fy=36 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
b. STRUCTURAL SHAPES W, AISC MANUAL LATEST EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A992 (Fy=50 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
c. STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBING, AS PER AISC MANUAL LATEST EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A500 GRADE B (Fy=46 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
d. STRUCTURAL STEEL PIPE, AS PER AISC MANUAL LATEST EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A53 GRADE B (Fy=35 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

3. ANY MATERIAL REQUEST WITH DIFFERENT SPECIFICATIONS THAN NOTED ABOVE ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGNER, IN A TIMELY MANNER, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND/OR INSTALLATION. ANY ITEM OF A DIFFERENT

SPECIFICATION INSTALLED, WITHOUT SPECIFIC PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL MAY NOT MEET THE PROJECT ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS NECESSITATING A REMOVAL AND/OR SIGNIFICANT REVISION TO ITEMS INSTALLED.

4. STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILING, FABRICATION AND ERECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AISC MANUAL AND THE LATEST EDITION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILING BY THE AISC.

5. A STEEL BUILDING IS STRUCTURALLY STABLE WHEN ALL ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE WHEN AND WHERE TEMPORARY BRACING IS NEEDED.

6. WELDS SHALL BE MADE WITH WIRE OR ELECTRODE HAVING A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 70,000 PSI, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER 48 HOURS BEFORE PLACEMENT OF

REINFORCING STEEL AND CONCRETE SO THAT THE SUBGRADE OF EXCAVATIONS MAY BE INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY BACKFILL MATERIAL, BACKFILLING PROCEDURES AND SOIL COMPACTION TESTS.

2. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER(S) OF RECORD OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 2022, SECTION 1704.

ALL RISK CATEGORY III AND IV STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION.

STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL CONSIST OF SITE VISITS AT INTERVALS APPROPRIATE

TO THE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION TO OBSERVE CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS AND

REVIEW OF TESTING AND INSPECTION REPORTS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE STRUCTURAL WORK AND THE NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE.

3. SPECIAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 2022 SECTIONS 1704 & 1705, SHALL BE

REQUIRED AS INDICATED IN THE SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET.

4. ALL SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED MUST BE BY APPROVED INDEPENDENT INSPECTORS WHO SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE OWNER. INSPECTORS SHALL SUBMIT THEIR REPORTS

DIRECTLY TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. THESE INSPECTORS ARE IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIRED AGENCY INSPECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSPECTIONS AND ALLOW ACCESS FOR THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM REQUIRED INSPECTIONS.

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION (CBC TABLE 1705.3)

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

1. INSPECTION OF REINFORCING STEEL,

INCLUDING PRESTRESSING TENDONS

AND PLACEMENT
X
ACI 318, CH 20

25.2, 25.3, 26.6.1,

26.6.3 3. INSPECTION OF ANCHORS CAST IN

CONCRETE WHERE ALLOWABLE LOADS

HAVE BEEN INCREASED OR WHERE

STRENGTH DESIGN IS USED
X ACI 318, 17.8.2

4. POST-INSTALLED ANCHORS

4.1 CONFORMANCE WITH

CONSTRUCTION DOCS AND

MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION

INSTRUCTIONS

4.2 HOLE DRILLING METHOD

4.3 ANCHOR EDGE DISTANCE AND

SPACING

4.4 HOLE DIAMETER AND DEPTH

4.5 HOLE CLEANING

4.6 ANCHOR TYPE, MATERIAL, DIAMETER

AND LENGTH

4.7 ADHESIVE TYPE AND EXPIRATION
DATE
X
*ADHESIVE ANCHORS IN

OVERHEAD OR

HORIZONTAL CONDITION

SHALL BE

CONTINUOUS

INSPECTION
ACI 318, 17.8.2.4
ACI 318, 17.8.2
4a. PROOF LOADING IN OVERHEAD

ORIENTATION X

ALL TYPES AND
10% OF

ANCHORS

5. VERIFYING USE OF REQUIRED DESIGN
MIX
X
ACI 318, CH. 19,

26.4.3, 26.4.4
CBC 1904.1,
1904.2

6. AT THE TIME FRESH CONCRETE IS

SAMPLED TO FABRICATE SPECIMENS

FOR STRENGTH TESTS, PERFORM SLUMP

AND AIR CONTENT TESTS, AND

DETERMINE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE

CONCRETE
X
ASTM C172
ASTM C31
ACI 318, 26.5,

26.12 7. INSPECTION OF CONCRETE AND

SHOTCRETE PLACEMENT FOR PROPER

APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
X ACI 318, 26.5

8. INSPECTION FOR MAINTENANCE OF

SPECIFIED CURING TEMPERATURE AND

TECHNIQUES
X
ACI 318,

26.5.3-26.5.5

9. INSPECT FORMWORK FOR SHAPE,

LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE

CONCRETE MEMBER BEING FORMED
X
ACI 318,

26.11.1.2(b)

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF SOILS
(CBC TABLE 1705.6)

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

1. VERIFY MATERIALS BELOW SHALLOW

FOUNDATIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ACHIEVE

THE DESIGN BEARING CAPACITY
X
CBC 1705.6

2. VERIFY EXCAVATIONS ARE EXTENDED TO

PROPER DEPTH AND HAVE REACHED

PROPER MATERIAL
X

3. PERFORM CLASSIFICATION AND TESTING

OF COMPACTED FILL MATERIALS
X

4. VERIFY USE OF PROPER MATERIALS,

DENSITIES AND LIFT THICKNESSES DURING

PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF

COMPACTED FILL
X

5. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED

FILL, OBSERVE SUBGRADE AND VERIFY THAT

SITE HAS BEEN PREPARED PROPERLY
X

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF STEEL

CONSTRUCTION

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

1. MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND TESTING OF HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS, NUTS AND WASHERS A. IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO

CONFORM TO ASTM STANDARDS

SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
X
RCSC: 1.5, AISC
360: A3.3 J3.1
AND

APPLICABLE

MATERIAL

STANDARDS
B. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE REQUIRED
X
RCSC: 1.5 & 2.1;
AISC 360: A3.3 &
N3.2
C. TESTING OF HIGH-STRENGTH BOLT,

NUTS AND WASHERS
RCSC: 7.2,

APPLICABLE

ASTM MATERIAL

STANDARDS

3. MATERIAL VERIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COLD-FORMED STEEL DECK A. FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL,

IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO CONFORM
TO AISC 360
X
AISC 360
SECTION M5.5
B. FOR OTHER STEEL, IDENTIFICATION

MARKINGS TO CONFORM TO ASTM

STANDARDS SPECIFIED IN THE

APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
X

APPLICABLE

ASTM MATERIAL

STANDARDS
C. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED TEST

REPORTS
X

MANUFACTURER

TO PROVIDE

CERTIFIED MILL

REPORTS

4. MATERIAL VERIFICATION OF WELD FILLER MATERIALS
A. IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO

CONFORM TO AWS SPECIFICATION IN

THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS
X
AISC 360
SECTION A3.3,
AND

APPLICABLE
AWS A5

DOCUMENTS
B. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE REQUIRED
X

MANUFACTURER

TO PROVIDE

CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE

5. INSPECTION OF WELDINGS
A. STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COLD-FORMED STEEL DECK
1) COMPLETE AND PARTIAL JOINT

PENETRATION GROOVE WELDS
X

SPECIAL

INSPECTIONS IN

THIS SECTION ARE

WAIVED WHERE

FABRICATION IS

PERFORMED ON

THE PREMISES OF

A FABRICATOR

REGISTERED AND

APPROVED IN

ACCORDANCE

WITH CBC SECTION
1704.2
AWS D1.1
CBC 1704.3.1
2) MULTIPASS FILLET WELDS X
3) SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS > 5/16" X
4) PLUG AND SLOT WELDS X
5) SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS <= 5/16" X
6) FLOOR AND ROOF DECK WELDS
X
AWS D1.5
CBC 1704.3.1
7) END-WELDED STUDS
X
AWS D1.1
1705A.2.5,
2213A.2, 2216.6.2
8) WELDED SHEET STEEL FOR

COLD-FORMED FRAMING MEMBERS
AWS D1.3
B. REINFORCING STEEL TABLE 170A.3,
ITEM 2

6. INSPECTION OF STEEL FRAME JOINT DETAILS FOR COMPLIANCE A. DETAILS SUCH AS BRACING AND

STIFFENING X
AISC 360: N5.8,
1705A.2.1
B. MEMBER LOCATIONS
X
C. APPLICATION OF JOINT DETAILS AT

EACH CONNECTION X

REINFORCING STEEL NOTES

1. ALL REBAR SHALL BE ASTM A615-GRADE 60. (EXCEPT FOR MASONRY WHICH SHALL BE GRADE 40)

2. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A1064.

3. ALL BARS SHALL BE FREE OF EXCESSIVE RUST, MUD, OIL, AND GREASE.

4. ARRANGEMENT AND DETAILING OF REINFORCING STEEL, INCLUDING BAR SUPPORTS AND SPACERS, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ACI 315 DETAILING MANUAL.

5. REINFORCING SHALL LAP A MINIMUM OF 1.3 Ld AT SPLICES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, WHERE Ld IS THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT LENGTH. WHEN BARS OF

DIFFERENT SIZE LAP TO EACH OTHER, SPLICE LENGTH FOR THE SMALLER BAR CAN BE USED. DOWELS SHALL HAVE THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING AS THAT OF THE

REINFORCING STEEL THEY ARE SPLICING AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LAP AS NOTED ABOVE. BAR SPLICES SHALL BE STAGGERED.

6. HOOK BARS AT OPENINGS.

7. TERMINATE ALL BARS IN LAPS OR 90° BENDS.

8. ALL REINFORCING MAY LAP WITH COUPLERS WHICH ARE 125% OF BAR STRENGTH OR GREATER. SUBMIT AN ICC REPORT FOR COUPLERS.

9. IF ONE LAYER OF REINFORCING STEEL IS SHOWN, IT IS TO BE LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE SECTION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

10. DIMENSIONS TO REINFORCING ARE TO BAR CENTERLINES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BAR COVER IS CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BAR AND THE CONCRETE SURFACE. UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE, BAR COVER FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT COVER

SIZE COVER (IN)

CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH
ALL SIZES 3

CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER
#6 - #18 BAR 2
#5 BAR, W31 OR D31 WIRE,

AND SMALLER
1 1/2

CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT WITH GROUND #14 & #18 BARS 1 1/2
#11 BAR & SMALLER 3/4
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
96 Section 10, Item 10E.

WELL 7 PUMP

DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM

BASIN BACKWASH STANDPIPE
GAC
LEAD
LAG
GAC
LEAD
LAG
GAC
LEAD
LAG

RAW WATER
BYPASS

BACKWASH
NC

TREATED WATER
WELL

FLUSH TO
WASTE

FORWARD FLUSH

TO WASTE

NITRATE

ANALYZER
NaOCl

SCHEMATIC PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

GAC DESIGN CRITERIA
DESCRIPTION WELL 7 NOTES

RAW WATER QUALITY
MAX TCP, ug/L 0.021
MAX NITRATE, mg/L 5.65
MAX HARDNESS AS CaCO
3 , mg/L 140
MAX IRON, ug/L ND
MAX MANGANESE, ug/L ND
pH 8.1

WELL PUMP
CAPACITY, GPM 1,700
HORSEPOWER, HP (EXISTING) 125

DRIVE TYPE (EXISTING) VFD

DISCHARGE PRESSURE, PSI
(EXISTING) 50

GAC TREATMENT DESIGN
NUMBER OF VESSELS6
VESSEL DIA (EA), FT 12

CARBON CAPACITY (EA), FT
3 714

CARBON TYPE TBD
OPERATION SERIES 3 PAIRS
HYDRAULIC LOADING RATE, GPM/SF 5.0
EMPTY BED CONTACT TIME, MINUTES 18.9

GAC BACKWASH DESIGN
MAX BACKWASH FLOW RATE, GPM 1,500 CARBON

SPECIFIC
BACKWASH LOADING RATE, GPM/SF 13.3 CARBON

SPECIFIC
BACKWASH TIME, MIN 30 (EST.) CARBON

SPECIFIC

BACKWASH VOLUME PER EACH
VESSEL, GAL 45,000 (EST.) CARBON

SPECIFIC
BASIN VOLUME, GAL 250,000

DISINFECTANT DESIGN CRITERIA
DESCRIPTION WELL 7

WELL PUMP
CAPACITY, GPM 1,700

DRIVE TYPE VFD
DISCHARGE PRESSURE, PSI 50

CHEMICAL FEED AND STORAGE
CHEMICAL 12.5% NaOCl

CHEMICAL PUMPS, QUANTITY
1 CHEMICAL PUMP TYPE PERISTALTIC
CHEMICAL DOSE RANGE, MG/L 0.50-2.00

CHEMICAL FEED RATE, GPH, MAX
AT DOSAGE OF 2 MG/L 1.70

CHEMICAL STORAGE TANK
CAPACITY, GAL 250
21 DAY VOLUME @ AVERAGE
DEMAND & DOSAGE OF 0.6 MG/L,
GAL
257
NC
NO NO
NC

CHLORINE

ANALYZER
NO
NC
NO
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

DESIGN CRITERIA
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-5
5 41
6/17/2024 10:09 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-5 DESIGN CRITERIA.dwg -Alex Gong

FM
8" EFF
SP
FC
LEAD
VESSEL
RW INF

NORMAL SERIES-VESSEL GAC TREATMENT

BACKWASH OPERATION
TW EFF

TCP TREATMENT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS
TO

DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
LAG
VESSEL
8" INF
SP
8" TW EFF
NO NC
NC NO
NC
NC NO
8" RW INF
NO
NC
SW
PI PI
SC

PP PP PP

SC FC SW

PP PP PP
FM
8" EFF
SP
FC
VESSEL
A
BW INF
FROM

DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM

VESSEL B
8" BW EFF
SP
8" BW INF
NO NC
NC
C
O
NC NO
8" RW INF
NO
O
SW SC

PP PP PP

SC FC SW

PP PP PP

PIPING ABBREVIATIONS

FC FRESH CARBON

SC SPENT CARBON

INF INFLUENT

EFF EFFLUENT

SP SAMPLE POINT

SW SPRAY WATER

PP PNEUMATIC PORT

CIP CHLORINE INJECTION POINT

FLOW ABBREVIATIONS

RW RAW WATER

TW TREATED WATER

BW BACKWASH

NO NORMALLY OPEN

NC NORMALLY CLOSED

O BACKWASH OPEN

C BACKWASH CLOSED

EQUIPMENT LEGEND

BALL VALVE

BUTTERFLY VALVE

CHECK VALVE

COMBINATION AIR RELEASE

AND VACUUM VALVE

EQUIPMENT LEGEND

DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE

TRANSMITTER

PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE

FLOW METER

EQUIPMENT LEGEND

GATE VALVE

HOSE CONNECTION

PRESSURE INDICATOR
FM
PI
CIP
NO
NOTE:

THE VALVE CONFIGURATION SHOWN
ABOVE IS TO BACKWASH VESSEL B. A

SIMILAR VALVE ARRANGEMENT IS USED TO
BACKWASH VESSEL A. VESSELS ARE TO BE
BACKWASHED SEQUENTIALLY.

SODIUM

HYPOCHLORITE

BACKWASH/RINSE
WASTE
FROM
WELL 7
SECOND
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR
BASIN
SECOND
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR
PDT
SECOND
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR
PDT

CHLORINE

RESIDUAL

ANALYZER
BASIN
PI PI
PI PI
PI PI
NC

TO BACKWASH STAND PIPE
(WELL FLUSH TO WASTE)

BYPASS CONNECTION

TO SYSTEM
NC
NO
THIRD
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR
THIRD
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR

BACKWASH

STAND PIPE
NO

NITRATE

ANALYZER
NC
FROM
WELL 7
NC

TO BACKWASH STAND PIPE
(WELL FLUSH TO WASTE)

BYPASS CONNECTION

TO SYSTEM
NC
NO
THIRD
GAC
VESSEL
PAIR

BACKWASH

FORWARD STAND PIPE

FLUSH TO
WASTE
SP
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-6
6 41
6/17/2024 10:10 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-6 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS.dwg -Alex Gong

WELL 7

GAC VESSELS
EL=300 EL=300
EL=320 EL=320
EL=400 EL=400
EL=420 EL=420
HGL=429.5±
(50 PSI)
HGL=431±
EL=440 EL=440
EL=460 EL=460 HGL=455.8±

TREATMENT HYDRAULIC PROFILE

TO DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
EG=314
HGL=454.1 ±
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

GENERAL

HYDRAULIC PROFILE
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
G-7
7 41
6/17/2024 10:10 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G-7 HYDRAULIC PROFILE.dwg -Alex Gong

EASEMENT
1 2
0 '
4 3
1 .4
'
270'
101

SET SPIKE
311.86
102

SET MAG NAIL
313.61

POINT TABLE
POINT #
101
102

NORTHING
2114437.50
2114229.67

EASTING
6366077.13
6366831.66

ELEVATION
311.86
313.61

DESCRIPTION

SET SPIKE

SET MAG NAIL
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-1
8 41
6/17/2024 10:10 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-1 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 15 30 60

SCALE IN FEET
R/W℄

S TEMPERANCE AVE

S MADISON AVE
R/W

EASEMENT
R/W

EASEMENT

R/W R/W
BASIN

GAC TREATMENT

TREATMENT

SITE PROPERTY

BOUNDARY
(E) ACCESS ROAD

SECTION LINE

PROPERTY LINE
(E) WELL 7
(E) WELL SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY

TOPOGRAPHY NOTE

TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS COLLECTED BY PROVOST &

PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP DURING A FIELD SURVEY
CONDUCTED IN JANUARY OF 2022.

BOUNDARY NOTE

THE BOUNDARY/EASEMENT INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE

PLANS IS BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION TIED TO PHYSICAL

MONUMENTS, AND WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF
VICINITY MAP BRYAN W. BOWERS, PLS 8469.

WELL 7 SITE

LOCATION

TREATMENT
SITE

LOCATION

E ADAMS AVE

S TEMPERANCE AVE

E WALTER AVE

E MICHELLE AVE

E KATHERINE AVE

S MADISON AVE

NOT TO SCALE

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
5/31/2024

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
100
Section 10, Item 10E.
o o o o o o o o o o o

SS SS SS SS SS SS

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR

RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R
W W

W W W W W W W
o
W
15' PIPELINE

EASEMENT
V
V
V
V V /
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

DEMOLITION PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-2
9 41
6/17/2024 10:13 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-2 DEMOLITION PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 15 30 60

SCALE IN FEET
R/W℄

S MADISON AVE

S TEMPERANCE AVE
R/W

EASEMENT
R/W

EASEMENT

R/W R/W

TREATMENT

SITE PROPERTY

BOUNDARY
(E) ACCESS ROAD

SECTION LINE

PROPERTY LINE
(E) WELL 7
(E) WELL SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY

DEMOLITION CALLOUTS
REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF (E) 12" WATER LINE
SEE SHEET C-6 - WELL CONNECTION SITE PIPING PLAN

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF (E) VEGETATION (VINEYARD
VINES, ETC) CLEAR AND GRUB.

WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND PIPE EASEMENT TYP

REMOVE (E) AC PAVEMENT FOR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION,

APPROXIMATE LIMITS
1 LEGEND

APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED

APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO DEMOLISH UTILITY

APPROXIMATE SAWCUT LINE

EXISTING AC PAVING

EXISTING CONCRETE
//
//
23 NOTES

1. DEMOLITION TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF FOWLER, PG&E AND ADJACENT LANDOWNERS.

2. EXISTING BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE
LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE UTILITIES TO

DETERMINE EXACT LOCATIONS AS A FIRST ORDER OF WORK, PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.

3. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED AND/OR
DEMOLISHED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFFSITE BY THE CONTRACTOR.

4. ANY SURFACING THAT IS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS SHOWN SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT VOIDS, HOLES,

AND UNEVEN GROUND RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WITH

ENGINEERED FILL IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRENCH BACKFILL DETAILS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. FINISH SURFACING SHALL BE PLACED AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS.

6. PROVIDE PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY FENCING AT ALL TIMES.

EASEMENT

EXACT LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF (E) IRRIGATION LINES
ARE UNKNOWN. IF ENCOUNTERED AND IN CONFLICT WITH

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE WITH CITY TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE.

COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
101
Section 10, Item 10E.
o
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

TREATMENT SITE PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-3
10 41
6/17/2024 10:13 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-3 TREATMENT SITE PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
TYP
BASIN

TREATMENT SITE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TOE
TOP
TYP
V
NOTES

1. SITE UTILITY LINES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REFER TO SITE PIPING PLAN.

2. CONTRACTOR MAY USE ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE FINAL PROPERTY LINE AS A STAGING AREA.

3. REFER TO THE GRADING SHEET FOR ONSITE SURFACE FINISHING.

TYP
V
V V
V V

EASEMENT EASEMENT
50'-5"
3 6'-0"
4 5'-0"
15'-0"
LEGEND

DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW

CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAD, SIDEWALK, OR
FOUNDATION. SEE STRUCTURAL DETAILS ON
SHEETS D-10 & D-11
6" THICK CLASS II AB COMPACTED TO 95%
RD OVER NATIVE SOIL SCARIFIED 6" DEEP
AND COMPACTED TO 95% RD
RIPRAP. SEE CITY STANDARD D-10, SHEET
D-13
GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD. SEE ACCESS ROAD
SHEETS R-1 THRU R-4.

C CONCRETE ELEV

EG EXISTING GROUND, DIRT
(E) EXISTING

FG FINISH GRADE ELEV

GB GRADE BREAK

TF TOP OF FOOTING

TG TOP OF GRATE

TW TOP OF MASONRY WALL
0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

EASEMENT TYP

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
MW
6' CONCRETE BLOCK FENCE SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET
D-6 FOR FOOTING AND EARTH RETAINING PORTION
OF WALL SEE CITY STANDARD M-6 WALL SECTION
B, AND M-7, SHEET D-13 FOR NON-RETAINING

PORTION OF WALL

A ANTENNA POLE, SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS
BI

DRAIN BASIN INLET STRUCTURE
SEE CITY STANDARD D-10 SHEET D-13

CH CHEMICAL STORAGE BUILDING
CJ CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT AT 15' O.C.

D-11
6 D-7
1 DG 15' DOUBLE ACCESS GATE
D-6
1 DI

DRAIN INLET TYPE B
SEE CITY STANDARD D-2 & D-3 SHEET D-12
G 4' SWING GATE
D-6
2 MH 48" STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
SEE CITY STANDARD D-7 SHEET D-12

P PANEL PAD, SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS
R

RIP RAP
SEE CITY STANDARD D-10 SHEET D-13

SA SERVICE ASSEMBLY CONNECTION
SEE CITY STANDARD W-1 SHEET D-12

SP STANDPIPE
D-3
1 SW SIDEWALK
D-10
3 V GAC VESSEL

VF VESSEL FOUNDATION
D-1
1 YL YARD LIGHT, SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS

C CONCRETE TRUCK PAD
D-11
7 COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
102
Section 10, Item 10E.
o
4:1
4:1
4:1
4:1

0.5%

0.9%

0.5 %

1.1%

1.0%

1.7 %

1.6%

0.9%

1.7 %

1.7%

1.7 %

2.0 % 1.2
%

1.2 %

2.0 %

1.0% 1.0%

1.5%

1.0%
o
FG 312.79
FG 313.06
FG 312.79 FG 313.24
FG 312.72 FG 312.72
FG 312.66
C 312.50 C 312.50
C 312.35 C 312.35
FG 312.66
C 313.05
TG 312.29
FG 313.31
FG 313.81
FG 312.81
FG 313.06
FG 313.06
FG 313.06
TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81 TOP 312.81
TOP 312.81
TOE 304.81 TOE 304.81
TOE 304.81 TOE 304.81
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
C 312.99
FG 311.2±

MATCH (E)
FG 312.0±

MATCH (E)
FG 311.9±

MATCH (E)
FG 312.81
FG 312.81
TW 319.13
TF 311.13 TW 319.13
TF 311.13 TW 319.13
TF 311.13
C 312.44
C 312.63 C 312.63
C 312.44
TW 319.13
TF 311.13
FG 312.83
C 312.99
FG 311.3±

MATCH (E)
C 312.80 C 312.80 C 312.78 C 312.78
FG 312.78
FG 312.78 FG 312.78
FG 312.81 FG 312.80 FG 312.80
FG 312.79 FG 312.79
C 312.96 C 315.30
RIM 312.64
TG 312.50

0.0 %
C 313.56
C 313.74
C 313.56 C 313.56
C 313.74
C 313.56

1.0 % 1.0
%

1.0 % 1.0
%
C 312.78
C 312.62 C 312.59 C 312.65 C 312.63
C 312.81
LEGEND

DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW

C CONCRETE ELEV

EG EXISTING GROUND, DIRT
(E) EXISTING

FG FINISH GRADE ELEV

GB GRADE BREAK

TF TOP OF FOOTING

TG TOP OF GRATE

TW TOP OF MASONRY WALL
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

TREATMENT SITE GRADING PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-4
11 41
6/17/2024 10:15 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-4 TREATMENT SITE GRADING PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
NOTES

1. SITE UTILITY LINES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REFER TO SITE PIPING PLAN.

2. CONTRACTOR MAY USE ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WITHIN PROPERTY LINE AS A STAGING AREA.

3. THE OVERALL BUILDING SITE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5% IN ALL AREAS TO AN APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY.

4. SOIL STERILANT SHALL BE APPLIED PRIOR TO AB PLACEMENT.

5. ESTIMATED GRADING QUANTITIES:

CUT=1617 CUBIC YARDS
FILL=236 CUBIC YARDS

6. GRADING QUANTITIES ARE INFORMATION ONLY AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR SHRINKAGE OR EXPANSION.

CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE OWN ESTIMATE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES.

7. GRADE AT MIN 2:1 TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE

GAC VESSEL SLAB
C 305.00'
(FL INLET STRUCTURE)
C 305.11'
(FL INLET STRUCTURE)

TREATMENT SITE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EASEMENT EASEMENT
0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
103
Section 10, Item 10E.
o o o o o o o o o o o

SS SS SS SS SS SS

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR

RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R RI R
W W

W W W W W W W
o
W
15' PIPELINE

EASEMENT
9+80
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
16+00
1 6
+
5 9

INFLUENT PIPELINE
300
305
310
315
320
325
300
305
310
315
320
325
9+80 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+59
F&I ±554 LF 14'' DUCTILE IRON
14'' 90°
ELBOW
14'' 90°
ELBOW
F&I ±9 LF 14'' DUCTILE IRON
FG

TREATMENT SITE

CMU WALL
TO GAC
1' MIN
1' MIN
12'' DI GATE VALVE
12X12X12
TEE
14X12

REDUCER
F&I ±21 LF 14'' DUCTILE IRON
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

OVERALL PIPING PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-5
12 41
6/17/2024 10:15 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-5 OVERALL PIPING PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 15 30 60

SCALE IN FEET
R/W℄
14" INF

S MADISON AVE

S TEMPERANCE AVE
R/W

EASEMENT
R/W

EASEMENT

R/W R/W
BASIN

GAC TREATMENT

CHEMICAL

ENCLOSURE

TREATMENT

SITE PROPERTY

BOUNDARY
(E) ACCESS ROAD

SECTION LINE

PROPERTY LINE
(E) WELL 7
(E) WELL SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
14" EFF
18" SD

CONCRETE
DRIVE
10" BW
18" SD

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
NOTES

1. ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPE SHALL BE

INSTALLED WITH RESTRAINED FITTINGS

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AIR RELEASE

VALVES AT HIGH POINTS ALONG

TRANSMISSION PIPELINES AND/OR

CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATER MAINS,
PER CITY STANDARD W-16, SHEET D-12.
18" SD
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
104
Section 10, Item 10E.

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR

W W W W W W W W W W

WWWWWWWW
100
101
102
103
104
VVVVVV

V V V V V V V V V
V V

VVVVVVV

V V V V V V V V V V V
V V
VVV
4' MIN

POINT TABLE
POINT #
100
101
102
103
104

NORTHING
2114253.04
2114238.04
2114243.48
2114248.91
2114219.86

EASTING
6366717.94
6366717.75
6366733.33
6366752.43
6366752.43
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

WELL CONNECTION SITE PIPING PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-6
13 41
6/17/2024 10:16 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-6 WELL CONNECTION SITE PIPING PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 3 6 12

SCALE IN FEET

S TEMPERANCE AVE

R/W EASEMENT
(E) WELL SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TO GAC

TREATMENT

FROM GAC

TREATMENT

PIPING LEGEND

PIPE MATERIAL COMMENT
14" DUCTILE IRON PIPE INFLUENT WATER FROM WELL 7
14" DUCTILE IRON PIPE TREATED WATER
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH INFLUENT AND

EFFLUENT FLOW LINES WITH WATER MAINS
INSTALLED IN S TEMPERANCE AVE.

2. ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPE SHALL BE
INSTALLED WITH RESTRAINED FITTINGS.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AIR RELEASE

VALVES AT HIGH POINTS ALONG

TRANSMISSION PIPELINES AND/OR

CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATER MAINS,
PER CITY STANDARD W-16, SHEET D-12.

V-07-06
V-07-07
V-12-08
12" MJ TEE
12" MJ TEE
14" MJ 90° ELBOW
WELL 7 SITE

SECTION LINE R/W

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
14"x12" MJ REDUCER
14"x12" MJ REDUCER

SITE PLAN CALLOUTS
(E) WELL 7
(E) 12" PVC WATER LINE
(E) IRRIGATION LINE
(E) VINEYARD
(E) PRIVATE RESIDENCE
(E) CONCRETE BLOCK FENCE
(E) STREETLIGHT
(E) SIGN (STOP SIGN AHEAD)
(E) LANDSCAPING/SHRUBS
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) CURB AND GUTTER
(E) EDGE OF AC PAVED ROAD

ABCDEFGHIJKL

DEMOLITION NOTES

1. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF (E) WATER PIPING AT
PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TYPICAL.

2. DEMOLITION TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF FOWLER,
PG&E AND ADJACENT LANDOWNERS.

3. EXISTING BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE
LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE UTILITIES

TO DETERMINE EXACT LOCATIONS AS A FIRST ORDER OF
WORK, PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.

4. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED

AND/OR DEMOLISHED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFFSITE BY
THE CONTRACTOR.

5. ANY SURFACING THAT IS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS
SHOWN SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT VOIDS,

HOLES, AND UNEVEN GROUND RESULTING FROM

DEMOLITION WITH ENGINEERED FILL IN CONFORMANCE

WITH THE TRENCH BACKFILL DETAILS AND THE
SPECIFICATIONS. FINISH SURFACING SHALL BE PLACED AS
SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS.

7. PROVIDE PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY FENCING ALONG
ADJOINING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES.

APPROXIMATE

SAWCUT LOCATION
D
C
B
D
L
C
B

H I JK I B G
B
A
F
E
E
12" GATE VALVE, TYP
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
105
Section 10, Item 10E.
o
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

TREATMENT SITE PIPING PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-7
14 41
6/17/2024 10:16 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-7 TREATMENT SITE PIPING PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET
BASIN

GAC TREATMENT

TO WELL
7 SITE

FROM WELL
7 SITE
NOTES

1. ABOVE GROUND DUCTILE IRON PIPE TO BE
COATED PER 09 90 00.

2. ABOVE GROUND MANIFOLD PIPING SHALL

BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED DUCTILE IRON

PIPE AND FITTINGS OR FUSION BONDED

EPOXY LINED AND COATED WELDED STEEL

PIPE AND FABRICATED STEEL SPECIALS PER
SPECIFICATIONS.

3. ALL JOINTS IN ABOVE GROUND MANIFOLD
PIPING SHALL BE FLANGED OR GROOVED.

4. ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPE MUST BE
INSTALLED WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS.
14" INF
14" EFF
18" SD
18" SD
C-91

TREATMENT SITE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EASEMENT EASEMENT
18" SD
INV 304.0'±
MIN
INV 304.0'±
MIN

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
INV 306.11
INV 306.01
INV 305.81
INV 305.71 INV 305.24
INV 306.55'
1 .
0%

1.0%
1 .
0 %
INV 306.65'
18" SD

1.0%
INV 306.95'
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
106
Section 10, Item 10E.
o
200 202 201
205 204 203
206
207
208
209
211 210
212
213
215 214
216 217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225 226
227
229 228
230
231
232
233
234
235
237
244
240
241 242
239 245
238
246
247
248
249
250

POINT TABLE
POINT #
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209

NORTHING
2114179.13
2114200.44
2114205.44
2114243.94
2114248.94
2114279.27
2114295.27
2114449.12
2114448.28
2114178.29

EASTING
6366165.59
6366165.84
6366165.90
6366166.36
6366166.42
6366166.79
6366166.98
6366168.82
6366288.82
6366285.59

POINT TABLE
POINT #
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219

NORTHING
2114188.40
2114238.81
2114238.38
2114187.97
2114253.89
2114266.22
2114266.03
2114253.70
2114279.23
2114294.23

EASTING
6366178.20
6366178.80
6366214.80
6366214.19
6366172.81
6366172.96
6366188.13
6366187.98
6366211.79
6366211.97

POINT TABLE
POINT #
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229

NORTHING
2114313.78
2114334.02
2114414.01
2114433.77
2114433.18
2114412.94
2114332.94
2114313.19
2114347.08
2114400.15

EASTING
6366202.20
6366182.44
6366183.40
6366203.64
6366253.63
6366273.39
6366272.44
6366252.20
6366216.07
6366216.70

POINT TABLE
POINT #
230
231
232
233
234
235
237
238
239
240

NORTHING
2114399.88
2114346.81
2114220.60
2114243.57
2114248.91
2114243.53
2114243.61
2114243.67
2114334.59
2114345.48

EASTING
6366239.77
6366239.13
6366196.59
6366196.86
6366196.93
6366199.88
6366192.75
6366188.49
6366227.54
6366227.67

POINT TABLE
POINT #
241
242
244
245
246
247
248
249
250

NORTHING
2114253.04
2114238.04
2114286.82
2114286.55
2114268.68
2114268.82
2114193.83
2114193.69
2114246.20

EASTING
6366286.48
6366286.30
6366204.38
6366226.96
6366166.66
6366146.66
6366145.76
6366165.76
6366156.39
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

TREATMENT SITE COORDINATES
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-8
15 41
6/17/2024 10:17 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-8 TREATMENT SITE COORDINATES.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

TREATMENT SITE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EASEMENT

EASEMENT
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
107
Section 10, Item 10E.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o o
o
o
o
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA
CIVIL

VESSEL SLAB PLAN
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
C-9
16 41
6/17/2024 10:18 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-9 VESSEL SLAB PLAN.dwg -Alex Gong

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024

TO DISTRIBUTION
FROM WELL 7 SITE
V-07-02

SCALE IN
= 1'-0"
0 3/8"
2 2 4 6
FEET

TO DROP
INLET
7-1B
7-1A
7-2A
7-2B
7-3A
7-3B
10 11
TOP
MIDDLE
BOTTOM
10 11
TOP
MIDDLE
BOTTOM
10 11
TOP
MIDDLE
BOTTOM
2 3
TOP
MIDDLE
BOTTOM
V-07-01
14" CROSS
14"x8" REDUCER TYP
1 C-9
TYP
14" 90° ELBOW, TYP
14"x10" REDUCING TEE

PIPING LEGEND
No. PIPE MATERIAL COMMENT
1 14" DUCTILE IRON PIPE RAW WATER FROM WELL 7
2 14" DUCTILE IRON PIPE TREATED WATER
3 10" DUCTILE IRON PIPE BACKWASH TO STORM DRAIN
4 1"
BELOW GRADE: DR-7 PE TUBING
ABOVE GRADE: GSP

SITE UTILITY WATER
5 NOT USED
6 2" PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FEED WITH
1 2" OD TUBING
7 18" SDR 35 PVC STORM DRAIN
8 4" SDR 35 PVC ANALYZER DRAIN LINE
9 8" DIP OR WSP RAW WATER FROM WELL 7
10 8" DIP OR WSP TREATED WATER
11 10" DIP OR WSP BACKWASH TO STORM DRAIN
12 2" PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
ANALYZER WATER WITH 1
2" OD
TUBING
C-10
A
C-10
B
TYP GC
BV
BV
TYP
NOTES

1. ABOVE GROUND DUCTILE IRON PIPE TO BE
COATED PER 09 90 00.

2. ABOVE GROUND MANIFOLD PIPING SHALL

BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED DUCTILE IRON

PIPE AND FITTINGS OR FUSION BONDED

EPOXY LINED AND COATED WELDED STEEL

PIPE AND FABRICATED STEEL SPECIALS PER
SPECIFICATIONS.

3. ALL JOINTS IN ABOVE GROUND MANIFOLD
PIPING SHALL BE FLANGED OR GROOVED.

4. ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPE MUST BE
INSTALLED WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS.
14"X10" REDUCING ELL

FABRICATED

SPECIAL
V-07-04 BV
D-1
4 BV BUTTERFLY VALVE

GC RIGID GROOVED COUPLING

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
ARV 1" COMBINATION AIR RELEASE VAVLE
D-2
5 CS CHEMICAL INJECTION/SAMPLE TAP
D-2
7 BFP
1" REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE

BACKFLOW ASSEBMLY
SEE CITY STANDARD W-12 SHEET D-12

VF VESSEL FOUNDATION

WH WHARF HYDRANT
D-3
3 D-1
1 SP STANDPIPE
D-3
1 VC VESSEL CONNECTION
D-1
3 SA SERVICE ASSEMBLY CONNECTION
SEE CITY STANDARD W-1 SHEET D-12

HB HOSE BIBB & RACK

EE EMERGENCY EYEWASH STATION

DPT DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER
D-8
1 D-8
2 D-8
3 D-3
4 TS TIERED PIPE SUPPORT
D-4
1 ST SAMPLE TAP
D-2
4 COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
108
Section 10, Item 10E.
= 1'-0"
0 3/8"
2 FEET

SECTION A
8" EFF
10" BW
8" INF
14" EFF
10" BW
14" INF
14" EFF
14" INF
TO

DISTRIBUTION
FROM
WELL 7
GC

FINISHED
GRADE

FINISHED
GRADE
14" 90° ELBOW TYP
14" x8" REDUCER, TYP
TYP
GC TYP
1" UW
14"x10" REDUCING TEE
10" 90° ELBOW
V-07-01 BV
1 2" PORT FOR DIFFERENTIAL

PRESSURE TRANSDUCER
(FAR SIDE)
(FAR SIDE)
3' MIN
= 1'-0"
0 3/8"
2 FEET

SECTION B

TO DISTRIBUTION FROM
WELL 7

TO BASIN
14" INF
10" BW
10" FLG x PE SPOOL PIECE, 6" LONG
18" SD

FINISHED
GRADE

FINISHED
GRADE
10" 90° ELBOW
10" CROSS
14" 90° MJ

ELBOW TYP
14" EFF
3' MIN

FABRICATED SPECIAL
BV

FABRICATED SPECIAL
14"x10"

REDUCER
14" 90° ELBOW, TYP
14"x10" REDUCING TEE
V-07-02 BV
V-07-03 BV
V-07-05 BV
V-07-04

ANALYZER

SAMPLE LINE
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:
6/17/2024 10:19 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C-10 PIPING SECTIONS.dwg -Alex Gong 17 41
C-10
261921012
MAY 2024

PPI KMM
91160
AJG

PIPING SECTIONS
CIVIL

FOWLER, CA

CITY OF FOWLER
WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT BID SET
MAY 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.expressly reserves its common law copyright and otherapplicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form ormanner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a thirdparty without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost &Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing theserights. 455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
5/31/2024
A
C-10 B
C-10

BV BUTTERFLY VALVE

GC RIGID GROOVED COUPLING

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
ARV 1" COMBINATION AIR RELEASE VAVLE
D-25

CS CHEMICAL INJECTION/SAMPLE TAP
D-27

VF VESSEL FOUNDATION
D-11

SP STANDPIPE
D-31
WFW

WELL FLUSH TO WASTE CONNECTION TO

BACKWASH LINE
SA

SERVICE ASSEMBLY CONNECTION
SEE CITY STANDARD W-1 SHEET D-12

DPT DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER
D-34

TS TIERED PIPE SUPPORT
D-41

ST SAMPLE TAP
D-24
TFW

TREATED FLUSH TO WASTE CONNECTION

TO BACKWASH LINE

WH WHARF HYDRANT
D-33
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
109
Section 10, Item 10E.
2'

2.0% 2.0%

2.0% 2.0%
V
V
V
E UCO UCO 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50

MATCHLINE
14+00 SEE SHEET R-2
18'
FG 311.27 FG 311.44 FG 311.61 FG 311.78
FL 310.94 FL 311.11 FL 311.28 FL 311.45
FG 311.47 FG 311.64 FG 311.81 FG 311.98
LIP 311.45
LIP 311.45
LIP 311.62
LIP 311.62
LIP 311.28 LIP 311.11
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
LIP 311.28TOE 311.7±

MATCH (E)
LIP 311.11
TOE 311.6±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.8±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
C/FG 311.2±

MATCH (E)
FL 310.82
LIP 310.72
LIP 310.72
STA 10+05.08
N: 2113484.7
E: 6366091.3
N0° 41' 04.42"E 1290.00'

ROAD ALIGNMENT
300
305
310
315
300305310315
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00

0.17%
STA 10+05.08
BEGIN ACCESS ROAD 311.19
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

ROADWAY DESIGN
STA 10+00-14+00
AJG91160

PPI KMM
9/24/2024261921012
R-1
18 41
9/30/2024 2:07 PM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_Roadway\Horizontal_Control\R-1 STA 10+00-14+00.dwg -Trent Pires 0 10 20 40

SCALE IN FEET

FG AT CENTER LINE
APN 343-030-17

FOWLER UNIFIED
APN 343-030-02T
(E) EDGE OF DIRT
(E) FENCE

EASEMENT BOUNDARY

EASEMENT BOUNDARY
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG

EG AT CENTER LINE
SP
89361

BID SET
9/24/2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other
applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
9/24/2024
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
LEGEND
REPLACE 5.5 LF OF CURB, GUTTER,
AND SIDEWALK. INSTALL 2 X 4"
DRAINS PER CITY STD D-4; ST-10;
AND ST-11.

DRILL AND EPOXY DOWELS INTOEXISTING CURB, GUTTER, AND

SIDEWALK AND GREASE EXPOSED
REBAR BEFORE CONCRETE POUR.FOR SIDEWALK, FURNISH AND
INSTALL 12" NO. 4 SMOOTH BARS AT
24" O.C. (3 MIN, PER SIDE). FOR CURB
& GUTTER, FURNISH AND INSTALL 16"
NO. 4 SMOOTH BARS (3 PER SIDE).

CONSTRUCT VALLEY GUTTER PERCITY STD ST-8 OVER 4" CLASS II ABOVER 8" OF COMPACTED NATIVESOIL (CNS) COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION.

CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AS
NOTED.

CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAD OR
FOUNDATION. SEE STRUCTURALDETAILS ON SHEETS D-10 & D-11. 10" AB CLASS II OVER 8" OF
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL (CNS)COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVECOMPACTION.

VG
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB

WITHIN LIMITS OF ROAD WORK PRIOR TO

CONSTRUCTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS.

R-4
ST-8
CG R-4
D-4
R-4
ST-10
R-4
ST-11
SG
R-41
VG
(E) AG VINES (TYP)
CG
SG
1 9/24/2024 1 PLAN CHECK REVISION SP

CITY OF FOWLER
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the project conditions ofapproval and the City Improvement Standards. The technical accuracy ofthe plan remains the responsibility of the Engineer of Record. Neither theCity nor its consultants accept or assume any liability for errors and/oromissions on these plans. This approval shall not prevent the CityEngineer from requiring correction of errors or omissions in plans foundto be in violation of any low or ordinance.The acceptance is valid for 12 months. An updated acceptance to thisplan set is subject to additional review and updates as determined by theCity. ____________________________ ________________ Soo Ho Park, PE Date City Engineer 09/30/2024
COF BUILDING SAFETY 10/1/24 110
Section 10, Item 10E.

2.0% 2.0%

0.87%

0.94%

0.80%

0.72%

0.62%
14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00

MATCHLINE
14+00 SEE SHEET R-1

MATCHLINE
19+00 SEE SHEET R-3
FG 311.95 FG 312.12 FG 312.29
FG 312.46
FG 312.63
FG 312.15 FG 312.32 FG 312.49 FG 312.66 FG 312.83
LIP 311.79
LIP 311.79 LIP 311.96
LIP 311.96
LIP 312.13LIP 312.13
LIP 312.30
LIP 312.30
LIP 312.47
LIP 312.47
FL 311.62 FL 311.79 FL 311.96 FL 312.13 FL 312.30
C 312.59
C/FG 312.80
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.8±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.4±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.3±

MATCH (E)
18' 2'
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.8±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 312.4±

MATCH (E)
FG/LIP 312.07
STA 16+04.16 (10.00' RT) BC
R50'
FG 312.20
STA 16+25.88 (17.55' RT) EC
C/FG 312.78STA 17+14.96 (66.00' RT) EC
C 312.65
FG 312.51
STA 16+69.93 (49.42' RT) BC
R80'
FG 312.83
STA 18+54.77 (66.00' RT) BC
FG 312.79
STA 18+84.17 (56.93' RT) EC
R50'
TOE 311.5±

MATCH (E)
TG 312.50
C 312.62 C 312.63
C 312.79 C 312.80

ROAD ALIGNMENT
300
305
310
315
300305310315
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00

0.17%
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

ROADWAY DESIGN
STA 14+00-19+00
AJG91160

PPI KMM
9/24/2024261921012
R-2
19 41
9/30/2024 2:07 PM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_Roadway\Horizontal_Control\R-2 STA 14+00-19+00.dwg -Trent Pires 0 10 20 40

SCALE IN FEET

FG AT CENTER LINE
APN 343-030-17

FOWLER UNIFIED
APN 343-030-02T
(E) EDGE OF DIRT
(E) FENCE

EASEMENT BOUNDARY

EASEMENT BOUNDARY
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG

EG AT CENTER LINE
SP
89361

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

DRILL AND EPOXY DOWELS INTOEXISTING CURB, GUTTER, AND

CONSTRUCT VALLEY GUTTER PERCITY STD ST-8 OVER 4" CLASS II ABOVER 8" OF COMPACTED NATIVESOIL (CNS) COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION.

CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AS
NOTED.

CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAD OR
FOUNDATION. SEE STRUCTURALDETAILS ON SHEETS D-10 & D-11. 10" AB CLASS II OVER 8" OF
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL (CNS)COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVECOMPACTION.

VG
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB

WITHIN LIMITS OF ROAD WORK PRIOR TO

CONSTRUCTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS.

R-4
ST-8
CG R-4
D-4
R-4
ST-10
R-4
ST-11
SG
R-41
(E) AG VINES (TYP)
VG
1 1 PLAN CHECK REVISION SP 9/24/2024

0.61%

2.0% 2.0%

2.0% 2.0%
W
18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 22+90

MATCHLINE
19+00 SEE SHEET R-2
FG 312.70
STA 19+42.51 (15.32' RT) BC
18'
FG/LIP 312.68
STA 19+54.55 (10.00' RT) EC
R50'
LIP 312.65
LIP 312.81
LIP 312.81
LIP 312.98
LIP 312.98
LIP 313.15LIP 313.15
FL 312.48 FL 312.64 FL 312.81 FL 312.98
FG 313.00 FG 313.17 FG 313.34 FG 313.51
FG 312.80 FG 312.97 FG 313.14 FG 313.31
AC 313.1±

MATCH (E)
AC 313.3±

MATCH (E)
TOE 312.9±

MATCH (E)
TOE 312.5±

MATCH (E)
TOE 313.0±

MATCH (E)
TOE 311.6±

MATCH (E)
TOE 313.1±

MATCH (E)
TOE 313.4±

MATCH (E)
TOE 313.3±
MATCH (E) TOE 313.3±

MATCH (E)

ROAD ALIGNMENT
300
305
310
315
300305310315
19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 22+90

0.17%

1.91%

2.32%
STA 22+79.44
END ACCESS ROAD 313.24
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

ROADWAY DESIGN
STA 19+00-22+90
AJG91160

PPI KMM
9/24/2024261921012
R-3
20 41
9/30/2024 2:08 PM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_Roadway\Horizontal_Control\R-3 STA 19+00-22+90.dwg -Trent Pires 0 10 20 40

SCALE IN FEET

FG AT CENTER LINE
APN 343-030-16

FOWLER UNIFIED
APN 343-030-02T
(E) EDGE OF DIRT
(E) FENCE

EASEMENT BOUNDARY

EASEMENT BOUNDARY
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG
2:1 DAYLIGHT TO EG

EG AT CENTER LINE
SP
89361

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

DRILL AND EPOXY DOWELS INTOEXISTING CURB, GUTTER, AND

CONSTRUCT VALLEY GUTTER PERCITY STD ST-8 OVER 4" CLASS II ABOVER 8" OF COMPACTED NATIVESOIL (CNS) COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION.

CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AS
NOTED.

CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAD OR
FOUNDATION. SEE STRUCTURALDETAILS ON SHEETS D-10 & D-11. 10" AB CLASS II OVER 8" OF
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL (CNS)COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVECOMPACTION.

VG
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB

WITHIN LIMITS OF ROAD WORK PRIOR TO

CONSTRUCTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS.

R-4
ST-8
CG R-4
D-4
R-4
ST-10
R-4
ST-11
SG
R-41
VG
1 1 PLAN CHECK REVISION SP 9/24/2024

ACCESS ROAD SECTION

EASEMENT BOUNDARY
VARIES 18' 2'
S= PER ACCESS ROAD PLANS
S= PER ACCESS ROAD PLANS 10" AB CLASS II
8" OF COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL
(CNS) COMPACTED TO 95%

RELATIVE COMPACTION
S= PER ACCESS ROAD PLANS

EASEMENT BOUNDARY
VARIES
SEE ALLEY DETAIL ST-8
6" OF COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL
(CNS) COMPACTED TO 95%

RELATIVE COMPACTION
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

ROADWAY DESIGN

CITY ROAD DETAILS
AJG91160

PPI KMM
9/24/2024261921012
R-4
21 41
9/30/2024 2:08 PM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\R-4 CITY ROAD DETAILS.dwg -Trent Pires

GAC VESSELS FRONT VIEW
2'-0"

GAC ANCHOR BOLS
0 1 2
D-12
6" TYP UNO
3" MIN
COVER
#6 @ 12" OC

EW, T&B

GAC VESSEL ANCHOR BOLTS
TYPE 316 SST ANCHOR BOLTS PER SECTION 05
05 20. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF (2) PER LEG VIA
DRILL AND EPOXY METHOD.

SUPPLEMENTARY #6 TIES TYING TOP

AND BOTTOM REBAR MATS
TOGETHER (2 REQ'D WITHIN 3" OF

EACH ANCHOR BOLT)
4'-0" MIN

EDGE DISTANCE

TO ANCHOR BOLT
3" MIN COVER
AT LEAST (1) HH TOP NUT & WASHER
NOTES

1. 1-1/2" ANCHOR BOLT HOLES IN VESSEL.

2. MINIMUM ANCHOR BOLT EMBEDMENT IS 22.5
INCHES.

3. THIS DETAIL FOR BIDDING PURPOSES

ONLY-ANCHOR BOLTS AND EMBEDMENT

PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATION
3/4" TO 2" NON-SHRINK GROUT,

CONTINUOUS BENEATH PEDESTAL
FEET AND VALVE TREE STAND.
0 1 2

VESSEL PIPE CONNECTION

NOT TO SCALE

GAC VESSEL CONNECTION

SUPPLIED BY VESSEL

SUPPLIER, TYP
8" EFFLUENT
10" BACKWASH

TO DRAIN
8" INFLUENT
10" X 8" REDUCER
2'-0"
MIN
2'-0"
MIN
8" TYPE 1 BUTTERFLY VALVE

SUPPLIED BY VESSEL

MANUFACTURER
NOTES

1. ORIENTATION OF VESSEL NOZZLES SHALL BE AS
SHOWN ON SITE PLANS.
2 1/2"

FABRICATED STEEL SPECIAL
1'-1 1/2"
11"
10" FLANGE,
TYP OF 2
AWWA STANDARD C110

FLANGE LOCATION
FOR 10" Ø 90° ELBOW
0 .5 1
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS SHOWN HERE
PRIOR TO FABRICATION.

2. FABRICATED STEEL SPECIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 40 05 14.

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

GAC DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-1
22 41
6/17/2024 10:23 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-1 GAC DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

TYPE 1 SAMPLE TAP

SITE PIPING
3/4" WELDED COUPLING

BRASS NIPPLE

NOT TO SCALE

REDUCER

BALL VALVE
FLEX
TUBING
TYPE 2 SAMPLE TAP

SITE PIPING
1/2"Ø STAINLESS STEEL

SAMPLE TAP

REDUCER
3/4" WELDED COUPLING

BRASS NIPPLE

NON THREADED

NOT TO SCALE
THREADED OUTLET 1

NOT TO SCALE
NOTE

1. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCH 40 BRASS
1" PLUG
1" BALL VALVE TYPE 2
NIPPLE
1" THREADED OUTLET
NIPPLE
1" 90° ELBOW

STEEL ELBOW
THREADED OUTLET 2

NOT TO SCALE

STEEL OR DUCTILE

IRON PIPE
1" THREADED OUTLET
NIPPLE
1" BALL VALVE TYPE 2
1" PLUG
NOTE

1. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCH 40 BRASS
TYPE 2 BALL VALVE

AIR RELEASE VALVE

NOT TO SCALE
NOTES

1. AIR RELEASE SIZE AS NOTED ON PLANS.

2. PIPE AND VALVE SIZE TO BE THE SAME AS AIR
RELEASE VALVE SIZE.

AIR RELEASE VALVE
(TYPE AS SHOWN

ON PLANS)
TYPE 2 BALL VALVE

WELDED STEEL OR DUCTILE

IRON PIPE
TEE

WELDED HALF COUPLING

GALV STEEL VENT LINE
& FITTINGS
EXTEND VENT LINE TO ℄

DISCHARGE PIPE
INSTALL 24 MESH
SCREEN
UNION

CHEMICAL INJECTION/SAMPLE TAP

NOT TO SCALE
TUBING

MALE TUBE

CONNECTOR
3/4"
HALF

COUPLING
MAIN

DISTRIBUTION
PIPE
NOTE: ORIENT QUILL AT 45°

FROM VERTICAL AS SHOWN
BELOW
1/2 Ø
NOTES

1. CHEMICAL INJECTION TAPS

SHALL BE SAF-T-FLO
MODEL EB-125 INJECTION

ASSEMBLY OR APPROVED
EQUAL.

2. SAMPLE TAPS SHALL BE
SAF-T-FLO MODEL SP-075
OR APPROVED EQUAL.

3. TUBE CHAMFER SHALL
FACE UPSTREAM. FLOW
PIPE

CHEMICAL INJECTION/

SAMPLE TAP

CHEMICAL CARRIER TUBING

ALLOW SUFFICIENT LENGTH

FOR CONNECTION &

MAINTENANCE
FG
1-1/2" CHEMICAL

CONTAINMENT PIPE
1' MIN

INSULATE EXPOSED

CHEMICAL TUBING FROM UV

CHEMICAL INJECTION/

SAMPLE TAP CONNECTION

CAP CONTAINMENT PIPE

TO PREVENT WATER

ACCUMULATION

NOT TO SCALE
D-2
6 LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-2
23 41
6/17/2024 10:23 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-2 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

TO STORM
DRAIN

FROM GAC

BACKWASH
OUTLET
4'
GRATE

NOT TO SCALE
6" TYP

AIR GAP PIPE

SUPPORT
INSTALL 1/8 "

MESH STS

SCREEN ON

BW PIPE
OUTLET

SLOPE GROUT

TO DRAIN
ASTM C-478 PRECAST CONC

MANHOLE SECTIONS W/ PEDESTRIAN

RATED GALVANIZED GRATE, DRILL
AND EPOXY ANCHOR FOUR 2' LONG
3"X2"X1/4" L BRACKET SEGMENTS TO

WALL AND BEND TO MATCH
CURVATURE OF INTERIOR SURFACE.

BRACKETS TO BE INSTALLED

EQUALLY AROUND THE
CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE MANHOLE.

GRATING TO SIT 1'-0" BELOW RIM.

DEPTH PER PIPING PLANS
6" MIN
D-3
2 SEE DETAIL
2" SQ. STEEL
TUBING 1/4" WALL

STANDPIPE
DRILL 5/8" X 4" DEEP HOLE IN
CONCRETE & EPOXY 1/2"Φ S.S.

ALL THREAD ANCHOR BOLT. MIN.
4" EMBEDMENT. SECURE WITH
1/2" S.S. WASHER AND NUT.
1/4" STEEL
PLATE
2" SQ. STEEL
TUBING
LENGTH
AS

REQUIRED
PIPE
1/2" NEOPRENE STRIP
1/2" X 2" SADDLE
2" X 2" X 1/4"

STEEL TUBING
1" TYP

DRILL HOLE
5/8"Ø
6" X 6" X 1/4"

STEEL PLATE
1" TYP 1/4'"
3'-0"
UNLESS

OTHERWISE
NOTED

AIR GAP SUPPORT

NOT TO SCALE
D-3
1 TEE W/ 4" BRANCH &

THREADED FLANGE
2-1/2" ANGLE VALVE W/ CAP

FEMALE NPT X MALE NH DIXON
AV250 OR EQUAL
2-1/2" STEEL PIPE

WHARF HYDRANT MANIFOLD CONNECTION

WHARF HYDRANT

NOT TO SCALE

FROM EFFLUENT

MANIFOLD

CONCRETE SLAB

PRESSURE TRANSDUCER AND STAND
18"
18"
(6) #4 BARS
12" LONG
2"Ø PIPE STAND
1" MIN

NON-SHRINK GROUT
1/2" X 5" EXP (4 REQD)
NOT TO SCALE4'

PIPE STAND MOUNTING BRACKET

DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER

SENSOR CABLE

INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT SENSING LINES
3 VALVE MANIFOLD
NOTES

1. FOR SUPPORTS IN AREAS OUTSIDE OF CONCRETE
SLAB, CONSTRUCT 18"X18"X6" PAD UNDER PIPE
SUPPORT.

2. DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER SHALL BE
ROSEMOUNT 2051 OR 3051 WITH 4-20 MA OUTPUT,
INTEGRAL LCD DISPLAY, AND ±1,000 INCHES OF
WATER RANGE.

CHEMICAL AND SAMPLING PIPES

2.5' MIN
9" MIN
NOTES

1. TRENCH MAY CONTAIN AS MANY SETS OF

CONTAINMENT/CARRIER PIPES AS NECESSARY FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

2. CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUOSULY SLOPE CHEMICAL
INJECTION LINES TOWARD METERING PUMP.

3. CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUOSULY SLOPE SAMPLE
LINES TOWARD ANALYZER.

CONTAINMENT PIPE

CARRIER PIPE
FG
BACKFILL TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY
0 FEET
2 4
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-3
24 41
6/17/2024 10:23 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-3 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

NOTES

1. PLACE 1/8" TEFLON PAD BETWEEN PIPE AND
SADDLE.

2. MODULAR FRAMING COMPONENTS SHALL BE
UNISTRUT B-LINE, KUMAR OR EQUAL.

3. USE A 2' DIAMETER 4.5' CAISSON UNDER EACH LEG
WITH 6-#6 IN LOCATIONS WHERE LEG FALLS
OUTSIDE OF THE GAC VESSEL PAD.

4. P1026 IS ACCEPTABLE TOP AND BOTTOM IF P1325
DOES NOT FIT.

5. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY MANIFOLD

HEIGHTS
P1000 UNISTRUT WELDED
CONTINUOUS TO BEAM.

TOUCH UP GALVANIZING
HSS 3"x3"x3/16" GALV TUBE,
SPACING IS 15' MAX OR 15'

OF TRIBUTARY PIPE LOAD

ADDITIONAL SUPPORTS

AS REQUIRED
SADDLE SUPPORT TYP.

P1001 UNISTRUT
P1325 CHANNEL CONNECTION

TYP, BOTTOM

BASE PLATE
1" TO 1-1/2"

NON-SHRINK
GROUT
2'-0" MAX.

U-BOLT OR STRAP AROUND

TOP OF PIPE-TYP
1/4" END CAP (TYP.)
2'-0 1/2"
TYP.

PIPE SADDLE MAY BE MOUNTED

DIRECTLY TO SLAB AS NECESSARY
5/8" 316 SS ANCHOR BOLTS
(4) PER PLATE, INSTALLED W/
HILTI HIT-RE 500 V3 EPOXY
P1026 CHANNEL CONNECTION,
TOP AND BOTTOM SEE NOTE 4.

TIERED PIPE SUPPORT

NOT TO SCALE
D-42
D-44
D-42
TIERED PIPE SUPPORT FOOTING 3'-0"
#5 @ 12" OC EW T&B
5'-0"
2'-0"
FG
1'-6"
1'-3"
(APPLIES WHEN PIPE SUPPORT

IS OFF OF VESSEL PAD)

NOT TO SCALE
8"x 8"x 5/8" SQUARE

STEEL BASE PLATE
3/4" Ø BOLT HOLE TYP
4" TYP
8"
8"
P1000 UNISTRUT WELDED
CONTINUOUS TO BEAM.

TOUCH UP GALVANIZING
HSS 3"x3"x3/16" GALV TUBE,
SPACING IS 15' MAX OR 15'

OF TRIBUTARY PIPE LOAD
4" TYP 1"
TYP
1"
TYP

WELD PLATE
TO BEAM 1/8

BASE PLATE DETAIL

NOT TO SCALE

PIPE SADDLE

NOT TO SCALE
9/16" Ø BOLT

HOLE TYP
1/2" HOLE

FOR U-BOLT
(2 PLACES)

SHAPE SADDLE TO

MATCH PIPE
1/4" STEEL PLATE

THROUGHOUT
WELDED

STEEL BASE
3/16
3/16

GALVANIZED

STRAP OR
U-BOLT

SECTION A

ELEVATION
1/2" X 5" EXP (4
REQD)

BASE PLATE TO BE

CONSTRUCTED

PER SECTION A
1/2" X 5" EXP (4
REQD)

GROUND MOUNTING

SUPPORT MOUNTING

SECTION A
9/16" Ø BOLT

HOLE TYP
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-4
25 41
6/17/2024 10:23 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-4 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

FLOOR SLAB
C
B
A
9"
1" MIN
NOTE: FOR SUPPORTS IN AREAS

OUTSIDE OF FLOOR SLAB, CONSTRUCT
18"x18"x6" PAD UNDER PIPE SUPPORT.
18"
18"
6"

THREADED
PIPE

CAST IRON

ADJUSTING NUT

THREADED
PIPE
1/2" X 5" EXP
(4 REQD)
GROUT
6-#4
BARS
12"
LONG

DIMENSIONS
PIPE
SIZE

SPACING
(MAX FT.) "A" "B"
"C"

MIN MAX
2 1/2" 10 2 1/2" 1 1/2" 6 7/8" 11 3/8"
3" 10 2 1/2" 1 1/2" 7 3/16" 11 11/16"
4" 10 3" 2 1/2" 7 13/16" 12 5/16"
6" 15 3" 2 1/2" 9 1/16" 13 9/16"
8" 15 3" 2 1/2" 10 1/2" 15"
10" 15 3" 2 1/2" 11 9/16" 16 1/16"
12" 15 3" 2 1/2" 12 9/16" 17 1/16"
14" 15 4" 3" 14 5/16" 18 13/16"
16" 15 4" 3" 15 5/16" 19 13/16"
18" 15 4" 3"

PIPE SUPPORT

PIPE STANCHION WELDED TO
TUBE WITH 3/16" FILLET WELD

U-BOLT OR STRAP AROUND

TOP OF PIPE-TYP

PIPE SADDLE
SUPPORT TYP.

NOT TO SCALE

PIPE SUPPORT

ELEVATION

SECTION
6"
2 1/2" MIN

LENGTH AS REQD
MAX LENGHT 3'
GALV STL PL 1/2" X 8" X 8"
ROUND POINTS 1/4" RAD
4 3/4"Ø X 1'-0" LONG W/3"
LONG HOOK TYPE 316 STS

ANCHOR BOLT W/ LEVELING
NUTS. FOR EXST SLAB 4
3/4"Ø DRILLED ANCHORS
4" STD WT GALV PIPE
(PAINT TO MATCH PIPING)

CONTINUOUS
WELD

GALV STEEL
ANGLE
PIPE

PIPE FLANGE
1" MIN, 3" MAX NON-SHRINK
GROUT
NOTES 1" TYP

1. BOLT HOLES TO MATCH FLANGE

2. ROUND ALL SHARP EDGES TYP
120° MIN
PIPE NOM DIA 4-8 L 6x6x1/2
PIPE NOM DIA 10-14 L 8x6x1/2
PIPE NOM DIA 16-24 L 10x6x1/2
℄ PIPE
12" MIN > =12 Ø
6" MIN < =12 Ø
VARIES
3'-0" MIN

SECTION A
1 1

CONCRETE ENCASEMENT

UNDER STRUCTURE
#4 @ 12" MIN
#4 TIES @ 12" MIN

CONCRETE ENCASEMENT

UNDER STRUCTURES

NOT TO SCALE
WATER MAIN SEPARATION 4"
6' 4' 4' 6'
1' 6'
NOTE: ZONES IDENTICAL ON EITHER SIDE OF CENTER LINES.

ZONE "P" IS A PROHIBITED ZONE.

SECTION 64572 (a) CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 22.

FIGURE 2-CROSSINGS
3'
9'

SPECIAL

PERMISSION
ZONE A
2 1

SPECIAL
PIPE
ZONE B
CASE 2

NEW WATER MAIN
"P"PROHIBITED ZONE
EXIST.

SEWER

MAIN CENTER LINE
FIGURE 1 PARALLEL CONSTRUCTION
6' 3' 1'
9'

SPECIAL

PERMISSION
ZONE A

SPECIAL
PIPE
ZONE B
CASE 1

NEW SEWER MAIN
"P"PROHIBITED ZONE
EXIST.

WATER

MAINCENTER LINE
2 1
CASE 1

NEW SEWER MAIN
ZONE "P"-PROHIBITED

NO JOINTS IN SEWER MAIN
ZONE "C"
1'
4"
WATER
MAIN
ZONE "P"-PROHIBITED

SPECIAL SEWER PIPE
ZONE "D"

NO JOINTS IN SEWER MAIN
4"
2' 8' 8' 2'
CASE 2

NEW WATER MAIN

NO JOINTS IN WATER MAIN
ZONE "C"
1'
4"
SEWER
MAIN
ZONE "P"-PROHIBITED
ZONE "D"

NO JOINTS IN WATER MAIN
ZONE "P"-PROHIBITED

SPECIAL WATER PIPE
CASE 1: NEW SANITARY SEWER MAIN INSTALLATION (FIGURES 1 AND 2)

ZONE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN

A SANITARY SEWER MAINS PARALLEL TO WATER MAINS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THIS

ZONE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER AND PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM.

B IF THE WATER MAIN PARALLELING THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE CASE 2 ZONE B REQUIREMENTS, THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. HIGH-DENSITY-POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE WITH FUSION WELDED JOINTS (PER AWWA C906-99);

2. SPIRALLY-REINFORCED HDPE PIPE WITH GASKETED JOINTS (PER ASTM F-894);

3. EXTRA STRENGTH VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE WITH COMPRESSION JOINTS;

4. PVC SEWER PIPE WITH RUBBER RING JOINTS (PER ASTM D3034) OR EQUIVALENT;

5. CAST OR DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH COMPRESSION JOINTS; OR

6. REINFORCED CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE WITH COMPRESSION JOINTS (PER AWWA C302).

C IF THE WATER MAIN CROSSING BELOW THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CASE 2 ZONE C, THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SHOULD HAVE NO

JOINTS WITHIN TEN FEET FROM EITHER SIDE OF THE WATER MAIN (IN ZONE C) AND SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. A CONTINUOUS SECTION OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH HOT DIP BITUMINOUS COATING; OR

2. ONE OF THE ZONE D OPTIONS 1, 3, 4, OR 5 BELOW.

D IF THE WATER MAIN CROSSING ABOVE THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE CASE 2 ZONE D REQUIREMENTS, THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SHOULD HAVE NO JOINTS

WITHIN FOUR FEET FROM EITHER SIDE OF THE WATER MAIN (IN ZONE D) AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. HDPE PIPE WITH FUSION-WELDED JOINTS (PER AWWA C906);

2. DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH HOT DIP BITUMINOUS COATING AND MECHANICAL JOINTS (GASKETED, BOLTED JOINTS);

3. A CONTINUOUS SECTION OF CLASS 235 (DR 18 PER AWWA C900) PVC PIPE OR EQUIVALENT, CENTERED OVER THE PIPE BEING CROSSED;

4. A CONTINUOUS SECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE (PER AWWA C302) CENTERED OVER THE PIPE BEING CROSSED; OR

5. ANY SANITARY SEWER MAIN WITHIN A CONTINUOUS SLEEVE.

CASE 2: NEW WATER MAINS INSTALLATION (FIGURES 1 AND 2)

ZONE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED FOR WATER MAIN

A NO WATER MAINS PARALLEL TO SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER.

B IF THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN PARALLELING THE WATER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE CASE 1

ZONE B REQUIREMENTS, THE WATER MAIN SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. HDPE PIPE WITH FUSION WELDED JOINTS (PER AWWA C906);

2. DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH HOT DIP BITUMINOUS COATING;

3. DIPPED AND WRAPPED ONE-FOURTH-INCH-THICK WELDED STEEL PIPE;

4. CLASS 235 PRESSURE RATED PVC WATER PIPE (DR 18 PER AWWA C900 & C905) OR EQUIVALENT; OR

5. REINFORCED CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE, STEEL CYLINDER TYPE, PER AWWA (C300 OR C302 OR C303).

C IF THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN CROSSING ABOVE THE WATER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE CASE 1 ZONE C REQUIREMENTS, THE WATER MAIN SHOULD HAVE NO JOINTS WITHIN TEN

FEET FROM EITHER SIDE OF THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN (IN ZONE C) AND BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. HDPE PIPE WITH FUSION-WELDED JOINTS (PER AWWA C906);

2. DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH HOT DIP BITUMINOUS COATING;

3. DIPPED AND WRAPPED ONE-FOURTH-INCH-THICK WELDED STEEL PIPE;

4. CLASS 235 PRESSURE RATED PVC WATER PIPE (DR 18 PER AWWA C900 & C905); OR

5. REINFORCED CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE, STEEL CYLINDER TYPE, PER AWWA (C300 OR C301 OR C303).

D IF THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN CROSSING BELOW THE WATER MAIN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CASE 1 ZONE D, THE WATER MAIN SHOULD HAVE NO JOINTS WITHIN

EIGHT FEET FROM EITHER SIDE OF THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN (IN ZONE D) AND SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AS FOR ZONE C.

NOT TO SCALE
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-5
26 41
6/17/2024 10:24 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-5 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

NOT TO SCALE

ENTRANCE GATE

HINGE LATCH

INSTALL ADDRESS

PLACARD
1-1/4" STEEL TUBE
FRAME (12 GAGE)
3'-4"
6'
2"
11'-0" DRIVE GATE
15'
3"
3/16" HEAVY WALL 4" SQ.

TUBE SOLID GROUTED
3"
16" Ø
3'

DRIVEWAY
9/16" X 18" DROP

LATCH ON

BACKSIDE OF GATE
6'
2" MIN.
3" MAX.
1" STEEL TUBE
PICKETS 10"
GAGE @ 12" O.C.

EXPANDED METAL MESH 3/4" X 3/4"
(10 GAGE) BACKSIDE OF PICKETS,

WELDED TO FRAME
NOTES

1. ALL GATES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED

POLICE/FIRE BYPASS LOCKS

NOT TO SCALE

ENTRANCE GATE HINGE DETAIL
4 1/2"
1"
4"
3 3/4"
45°
1"
1/4" MAX
1-1/4" SQ. TUBING
3/4"Ø COLD

ROLLED STEEL

LOCKING CAN RING
HEAVY WALL 4" SQ. TUBING
3/8" A325 BOLT
3/4" PILLOW BLOCK
1/4" THICK STOCK
1/8"
1/8
1/8"
1/8"
GATE EDGE 1-1/4"

PICKET TUBE
1/2"
1/8"

FLAT WASHER

LOCK WASHER

NOT TO SCALE
2" MIN
1/4" MIN
1-1/4"
5/8"
R=5/8"
5/8"Ø HOLE
1-1/4" STEEL TUBE

GATE FRAME
1-1/4"
NOTE: WELD LATCH TO FRAME

ENTRANCE GATE LATCH DETAIL

NOT TO SCALE

ENTRANCE GATE SINGLE

HINGE LATCH
3'-7"
6'
4'-0"
2"
3/16" HEAVY WALL 4" SQ.

TUBE SOLID GROUTED
3"
16" Ø
3'
6'
2" MIN.
3" MAX.
1" STEEL TUBE PICKETS
10" GAGE @ 12" O.C.

EXPANDED METAL MESH
3/4" X 3/4" (10 GAGE)

BACKSIDE OF PICKETS,

WELDED TO FRAME
NOTES

1. ALL GATES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED

POLICE/FIRE BYPASS LOCKS
3"
8IN. CMU MASONRY WALL
(2'-8" MAX. RETAINED HGT.)
3'-0"
1'-0"
⅊

NEW LOT TYPICAL
SLOPE
(3)-#4 HORIZ. REBAR
#4 HORIZ. REBAR CONT.

ADJACENT GRADE PER GRADING PLAN
#4 HORIZ. REBAR
@ 24" O.C.
8X8X16 CMU WALL

GROUTED SOLID
2'-8"
6" CMU MASONRY WALL (6' HIGH)
SEE DETAILS M-6 & M-7, D-13
(2)-#5 HORIZ. REBAR
#4 VERT. REBAR
@ 24" O.C.
#4 VERT. REBAR
@ 48" O.C. TO FULL

HEIGHT OF WALL
NOTES

1. GROUT ALL CELLS

2. SEE DETAILS M-6 & M-7 ON SHEET D-13 FOR

ADDITIONAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATION ON

CMU MASONRY WALL

3. 2'-8" MAXIMUM RETAINED HEIGHT
0 FEET
.5 1

FINISHED GRADE

PER GRADING PLAN
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-6
27 41
6/17/2024 10:24 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-6 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

NOTES

1. TANK TO BE VENTED OUTSIDE ENCLOSURE

2. ORIENTATION OF EQUIPMENT SHALL BE BASED

ON THE GATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS

3. CENTER METALLIC VAPORTITE LIGHT FIXTURE

ON INSIDE OF BUILDING ATTACH TO PURLINS

PER MANUFACTURER SPECS SEE ELECTRICAL
SHEETS
CHEMICAL STORAGE ENCLOSURE PLAN 8'-10"

STEEL SUPPORT
COLUMN

HOSE RACK SHOWER/EYE

WASH STATION

CHAINLINK FENCE MATERIAL

WITH PLASTIC SLATS

WATER TO WASH STATION

CHLORINE RESIDUAL

ANALYZER

NITRATE ANALYZER
11'-2"

CHEMICAL

FEED SYSTEM

HYPOCHLORITE

DISCHARGE LINE
6' SINGLE SWING

GATE WITH

LOCKABLE LATCH

ANALYZER DRAIN TO
STAND PIPE DRAIN.

SEE PLAN.

HOSE BIBB

DOUBLE WALL

POLYETHYLENE

CHEMICAL STORAGE TANK
4'-0"
0 1 2
12'-4"
10'-0"

SIDEWALK
D-8
5 D-10
3 D-8
3 D-8
2 D-8
1 BACKFLOW PREVENTER

SEE CITY STANDARD
DETAIL W-12 SHEET D-12
4 D-9
2" TANK VENT

LIGHT FIXTURE AND SWITCH
(SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS)

ANALYZER WATER FROM

GAC EFFLUENT
10'-0"

FILL LINE
6 D-8

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION
0 1 2

BEAM SADDLE

WOOD HEADER
2"x 6" FACIA BOARD

WITH METAL FLASHING
12'-4"
2" SCH 80

GALV TUBE

RAIL (TYP)
3" GALV RAIL

ENDS (TYP)
1" STRETCHER

BAR (TYP)

HOSE RACK
3" TENSION

BANDS (TYP)
3" INDUSTRIAL

HINGE (TYP)

FOUNDATION
12" TALL CONTAINMENT CURB
D-8
2 D-8
3 5
D-9
2 D-10

HOSE BIBB
SHOWER
HEAD
2" SCH 80 GALV

TUBE RAIL (TYP)
D-8
1 EMERGENCY

EYEWASH
SHOWER
6' SINGLE

SWING GATE

TENSION
WIRE

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE

COMPONENT ELEVATION
0 1 2

DISCHARGE

CONNECTION
5 D-7
D-8
5 TREATED
WATER

ANALYZER
PANEL

LIGHT SWITCH AND

WEATHERPROOF

RECEPTACLE (SEE

ELECTRICAL SHEETS)
2" TANK VENT

SUCTION

CONNECTION
5 D-7

EQUIPMENT PAD
3 D-7

FILL LINE
6 D-8
CONNECTION SIZING:

1. 2" TEE SxSxNPT

2. 2" X 1/2" NPT BUSHING

3. 1/2" NPT BALL VALVE (SEE NOTE 1)

4. 1/2" NPT HOSE BARB W/ SST WORM GEAR HOSE CLAMP

5. 1/2" PVC TUBING

6. 3/4" SxNPT ADAPTER

7. 3/4" SCH 80 PVC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 NOTE

1. NO BALL VALVES REQUIRED FOR VENT CONNECTIONS
1 2
3 4
5 4
3 3
4 5
4 3
6 CHEMICAL CONNECTION

NOT TO SCALE

SUCTION CONNECTION DISCHARGE CONNECTION
7 12" FROM

EACH EDGE

AT CORNERS
TYP
4" MIN

CLEAN & ROUGH

CONCRETE SURFACE

CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB
ON GRADE (4" THICK MIN

VERIFY)
#4 @ 12" OC, EW

CENTER OF SLAB
#4 BENT DOWEL @ 3' OC
W/3" MIN EMBED ANCHORED

W/ EPOXY ADHESIVE
(MIN OF 2)
3/4" CHAMFER
STD
HOOK

NOT TO SCALE

EQUIPMENT PAD
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-7
28 41
6/17/2024 10:25 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-7 CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

EMERGENCY EYE WASH & SHOWER

NOT TO SCALE

FLOOR LINE
WASTE
1 1/4" IPS

EYE WASH
SELF
DRAIN
VALVE

AIR GAP
SP158B FREEZE

PROTECTION
VALVE
SUPPLY
1 1/4" IPS

SELF DRAIN
VALVE

PULL ROD SAFETY SIGN
9"
(3) 3/8" HOLES
ON 8" BC

FREEZE PROTECTED EYE WASH/SHOWER WITH
STAINLESS STEEL BOWL HAWS 8300.158 OR EQUAL
2'-0"
1" HOSE BIBB TYPE 4
3 X 4 X 1/4" CHANNEL STIFFENER (GALV.)

RISER SAME SIZE AS HOSE VALVE,
SCH. 80 GALV. STEEL, PAINTED

ATTACH RISER TO STIFFENER
WITH U-BOLT, TYP.

TOP OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION
GRADE

HOSE BIBB

NOT TO SCALE

FLOOR MOUNTED HOSE RACK

PLAN VIEW
1/2"Ø SST

CA (TYP)
10"
6"
AL CS6 x 4.03
1" (TYP) 7 1/2" 3'-0" 9"
1'-6"
9"
1'-0"
1/2"Ø STS BOLT NUT,

AND WASHER (TYP)
AL CS6 X 4.03 (TYP)
1" NON-SHRINK

GROUT (TYP)
(TYP)
1/4
1/2"Ø STS CA (TYP)
NOTES

1. FABRICATE UNITS FROM
1/8" 6061-T6 ALUMINUM=
ALLOY PLATE. USE TYPE
A U.O.N. ON DRAWINGS.

NOT TO SCALE
3 TREATED WATER ANALYZER PANEL
FF
4'-0"
6'-0"

TO STAND
PIPE
1 DESCRIPTION

NOT USED

ANALYZER FEED WATER PIPE

ANALYZER NAMEPLATE (TYP)

DRAIN LINE (SIZE & MATERIAL PER PLAN)

CHLORINE ANALYZER CONTROLLER

CHLORINE FLOW CELL
pH FLOW CELL

NITRATE ANALYZER CONTROLLER

NITRATE FLOW CELL

SAMPLE TAP (TYP)

BALL VALVE (TYP)
1/2" BACKBOARD, SEE NOTE 2

TUBING ADAPTER

NITRATE SENSOR

NOT USED
UNISTRUT PIPE MOUNT, SEE DETAIL # SHEET D-5
1" SITE WATER PIPE
1" x 1/2" REDUCER
ID

MATERIAL LIST
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
NOTES

1. ALL ANALYZERS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONDITIONING ACCESSORIES.

2. MOUNT ANALYZERS TO WATERPROOF POLYMER OR STAINLESS STEEL BACKBOARD. RIGIDLY MOUNT EQUIPMENT, ACCESSORIES, CABLES, AND

TUBING/PIPES TO BACKBOARD USING STAINLESS STEEL CLIPS AND FASTENERS. MOUNTING USING ADHESIVES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

3. ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXES FOR POWER AND SIGNAL TO/FROM THE

ANALYZERS SHALL BE MOUNTED TO THE BACKBOARD NEAR THE

ANALYZERS WITH CONDUIT/CABLE ROUTED NEATLY BETWEEN THE
JUNCTION BOXES AND ANALYZERS.
14 15
XX-AE/AIT-01 XX-AE/AIT-02
4'-0"
16 TYP

FROM EFFLUENT

MANIFOLD
17 18
3 8
9 14
13 2
10 11
13 6
5 7
12 16
4 17

UNISTRUT PIPE MOUNT
NOT TO SCALE 6' HIGH @ 6' OC MAX
2-INCH

UNISTRUT
1"Ø PVC PIPE FOR

CHEMICAL FEED TUBING-ELEVATION

AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER

PIPE CLAMP
FF
(4) 1/2"x 6" 316 SS ANCHOR
1" GROUT
NOTES

1. UNISTRUT SUPPORTS LOCATED IN CHEMICAL

ENCLOSURE SHALL BE FRP WITH STAINLESS STEEL
FASTENERS AND CLIPS.
6"x 6"x 3/8" MOUNTING PLATE

WELD UNISTRUT TO MOUNTING PLATE
7/16"Ø HOLE FOR 3/8"

SS ANCHOR BOLT TYP

NOT TO SCALE

FILL LINE
2" CPVC

BALL VALVE
2" CPVC 90° EL
2" CPVC 45° EL
2" CPVC CAP
3'-0"

FRP UNISTRUT

PIPE MOUNT
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-8
29 41
6/17/2024 10:25 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-8 CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE ROOFING PLAN
0 1 2
NOTES

1. EXPOSED MATERIALS TO BE PAINTED, PER
SPECIFICATION 09 90 00.
14'-2"
11'-2"
2x10 FACIA BOARD AT ENDS W/
METAL DRIP EDGE TYP.
14'-0"
1'-6" 11'-2" 1'-6"
10'-0"
2x8 RAFTERS @ 2' OC
3" STD. PIPE TYP
4x8 DF NO. 1 BM, TYP.

METAL

RAKE TRIM
SIMPSON LUS28
(TYP EA END OF

EA RAFTER)
5/8" CDX STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD

ROOF SHEATHING BLOCK EDGES
WITH 2x8 8d NAILS @ 6" ALL EDGES
TYP.

METAL

EAVE TRIM
2'-0" 2'-0"
SIMPSON H2.5 HURRICANE TIE
FROM PURLIN TO BM., TYP.

CONT. 2x BLK'G o/
BMs. w/ A34 CLIP
TO BM.
2 D-9
1 D-10
1 D-10

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN
12'-4"
10'-0"11'-2" 4'-0"
0 1 2
15'-2"
11'-2"

SLOPE (SEE CIVIL PLANS)
SIDEWALK 3
D-10

CONCRETE FOUNDATION
2 D-10
3" STD. PIPE TYP
6'-0"

COMPOSITION

SHINGLE

ROOFING
PLYWOOD 7'-9"
9'-1"

RAFTERS (TYP)

CHEMICAL ENCLOSURE
2x8 FASCIA BOARD @

PERIMETER W/ METAL
DRIP EDGE, TYP.
3" STD. PIPE TYP

SIDEWALK

CONCRETE FOUNDATION
0 1 2
4X8
1'-0"
3 D-10
2 D-10

SUPPORT STEEL COLUMN
= 1'-0"
0 1-1/2"
6 INCHES
2" TYP
10"
6"
10"
6"
3" STD PIPE,
GALV
10"x 10"x 1/2" SQUARE

STEEL BASE PLATE
3/4" HEADED ANCHOR
BOLT w/ 15"

EMBEDMENT (TYP)
1/4

BEAM SADDLE
= 1'-0"
0 1-1/2"
6 INCHES
1/4

BEAM PER PLAN
3" STD. PIPE, GALV

SIMPSON
CCOQ4-SDS2.5, GALV 2" SCH 80 GALV

TUBE RAIL
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

STRUCTURAL DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-9
30 41
6/17/2024 10:26 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-9 STRUCTURAL DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

A OR G DETAILING DIMENSION
H
D
Db
6 Db OR
3" MIN
HOOK
A OR G

DETAILING

DIMENSION

DETAILING

DIMENSION
Db Db
A
OR
G

STIRRUP HOOKS SEISMIC STIRRUP/TIE

HOOK BEND
4Db or
2-1/2" MIN.
12 Db
SPLICE LENGTH FOR CLASS B = CHART 1 X CHART 2
TIE

REINFORCEMENT BENDS

REINFORCEMENT BENDS & SPLICES

STRAIGHT REBAR SPLICE
(TIE BENDS SIMILAR)
9Db OR
6" MAX.

CHART 1

CONCRETE STRENGTH (PSI)
2500 3000 3500 4000 5000
#6 AND SMALLER 63 57 53 50 45
#7-#11 78 72 66 62 56
NOTES

1. SPLICES SHOWN ARE NORMALWEIGHT
CONCRETE, UNCOATED SPLICE fy=60ksi
f'c=4ksi CALCULATED PER ACI 318-19
SECTION 25.4.2.3. SEE CHART 1 FOR
DIFFERENT CONCRETE STRENGTHS.

2. Db = (1) BAR DIAMETER
D = FINISHED INSIDE BEND DIA.

D = 6Db FOR #3-#8
D = 8Db FOR #9-#11
D = 10Db FOR #14 AND #18
135° SEISMIC HOOK
SIZE D A OR G ARROX. H
#3 1 1/2" 4" 2 1/2"
#4 2" 4 1/2" 3"
#5 2 1/2" 5 1/2" 3 3/4"
#6 4 1/2" 8" 4 1/2"
#7 5 1/4" 9" 5 1/4"
#8 6" 10 1/2" 6"
90° 135°
SIZE D A OR G A OR G ARROX. H
#3 1 1/2" 4" 4" 2 1/2"
#4 2" 4 1/2" 4 1/2" 3"
#5 2 1/2" 6" 5 1/2" 3 3/4"
#6 4 1/2" 12" 8" 4 1/2"
#7 5 1/4" 14" 9" 5 1/4"
#8 6" 16" 10 1/2" 6"
DIMENSION OF STANDARD 180° HOOKS,

ALL GRADES

DIMENSION OF
STANDARD 90°

HOOKS, ALL GRADES

SIZE D J A OR G D A OR G
#3 2 1/4" 3" 5" 2 1/4" 6"
#4 3" 4" 6" 3" 8"
#5 3 3/4" 5" 7" 3 3/4" 10"
#6 4 1/2" 6" 8" 4 1/2" 12"
#7 5 1/4" 7" 10" 5 1/4" 14"
#8 6" 8" 11" 6" 16"
#9 9 1/2" 11 3/4" 15" 9 1/2" 19"
#10 10 3/4" 13 1/4" 17" 10 3/4" 22"
#11 12" 14 3/4" 19" 12" 24"
#14 18 1/4" 21 3/4" 27" 18 1/4" 31"
#18 24" 28 1/2" 36" 24" 41"
D-4Db
(TYP)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D

DETAILING

DIMENSION

DETAILING

DIMENSION
D
BEAM
℄
BEAM
℄
BEAM
℄

NOT TO SCALE
4" MIN
6 Db
H
D
'TOP BAR' = HORIZ. BARS
WHERE d >12" FRESH

CONCRETE PLACED
BELOW HORIZ. REINF.
d
CHART 2
BAR SIZE CL1 CL2
#4 0.5 0.65
#5 0.63 0.81
#6 0.75 0.98
#7 0.875 1.14
#8 1.0 1.3
#9 1.28 1.47

CONCRETE BAR TYPES LAP TYPE
FOOTING BARS (OTHER THAN TOP BARS) CL1
HORIZ. WALL BARS CL2
FOOTING 'TOP BARS' CL2
WALL CHORD BARS CL3

WELDED WIRE FABRIC
6 x 6 - WI.4 x WI.4

CENTERED TOOLED EDGE (TYP)

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

NOT TO SCALE
5" M
NI U
N
O

ROOF TRIM
0 = 1'-0"
2 6"
INCHES
4"
5 3/4"
3/4
1/
"
2" HEM
5 1/4"
4 7/8"
1 3/4"
7/8"
1/2" HEM
3/4"
1/2" HEM
5 1/2" (VARIES)
3/8" HEM
5" (VARIES)
1/2"
3/8" HEM
EAVE

GABLE TRIM
PEAK

CONCRETE FOUNDATION DETAIL
0 = 1'-0"
2 1/2"
FEET
(2) #4 CONT. EACH SIDE
FF = FG + 3"
#5 @ 12" OC EW
1'-0"
1'-2"
1'-0"
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

STRUCTURAL DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-10
31 41
6/17/2024 10:26 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-10 STRUCTURAL DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

REINFORCEMENTS WITH NO WATERSTOPS

SINGLE CURTAIN

DOUBLE CURTAIN

NOT TO SCALE

INTERIOR CORNERS
0 .5 1
4-#4X4'-0" @ 6" CC, TOP LAYER
3/4" BELOW TOP OF SLAB

EDGE OF SLAB
3"

OPENING OPENING
D D B
B

FOR OPENINGS
12" TO 21"

FOR OPENINGS
21" TO 54"

CONCRETE OPENING REINFORCEMENT

WITHOUT LIQUID OR SOIL

PROVIDE BARS EQUAL IN

TOTAL AREA TO REGULAR

REINFORCING INTERRUPTED
BY OPENING. PLACE ONE

HALF TOTAL AREA TO EACH
SIDE OF THE OPENING.

SPACED AT 3" OC.

ONE EXTRA BAR EACH

CORNER PER LAYER OF

REGULAR REINFORCING
(SEE TABLE BELOW.)

BAR LENGTH

THICKNESS
OF

CONCRETE
BAR
SIZE
RECT.

OPENING
CIRCLE

OPENING
< 12" #4 3'-0" D+24"
12" - 18" #5 3'-0" D+24"
>18" #6 3'-8" D+24"
B = THE REQUIRED LENGTH FOR LAPPED SPLICE
FOR TOP BARS AS SHOWN IN CONC.

REINFORCEMENT SPLICE TABLE.

NOTE

THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO ALL OPENINGS IN WALLS AND SLABS THAT

DO NOT RETAIN LIQUID OR SOIL
W
A
D
1/4"
KEY
SLOPE
NOTES

1. KEYS ARE REQUIRED FOR HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.

2. FOR SUSPENDED SLABS, PROVIDE A KEY FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE CONSTRUCTION JOINT LENGTH.

CONCRETE LONGITUDINAL JOINT

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

THICKNESS OF SLAB
OR WALL "A"

NOMINAL KEY
SIZE DxW
LESS THAN 8" 2x3
9" TO 12" 2x4
13" TO 18" 2x6
19" TO 24" 2x8
MORE THAN 24" 2x12

NOT TO SCALE

REINFORCING CONTINUOUS
THROUGH JOINT. LAP ON EITHER

OR BOTH SIDES IS OPTIONAL
SEALANT NOTE:

ALL COLD JOINT INTERFACES BETWEEN CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL BE FILLED WITH "SIKAFLEX 1A OR 1C SL" ELASTOMERIC SEALANT OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONCRETE SHALL CURE FOR AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO SEALANT PLACEMENT. CLEAN OUT GAP PRIOR TO SEALANT PLACEMENT AND APPLY ACCORDING TO PRODUCT MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS. SEALANT SHALL FILL JOINT TO THE FINISHED SURFACE.

FURNISH AND INSTALL

ELASTOMERIC SEALANT

IN GAP (SEE NOTE)

CONCRETE JOINT SEALANT

NOT TO SCALE
SAWCUT
NOTES

1. IF SINGLE LAYER REINFORCEMENT, EVERY OTHER BAR IS DISCONTINUOUS AT JOINT.

2. IF 2 LAYERS REINFORCEMENT, TOP LAYER IS COMPLETELY DISCONTINUOUS AT JOINT.

3. JOINT FORMED WITH TOOL OR INSERT STRIP MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SAWED TYPE ONLY WITH PRIOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER.

4. SAWED JOINT MUST BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 12 HOURS OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT.

CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT

NO WATERSTOP OR

DOWELS AT JOINT
1/4T x 1/16" SAWCUT JOINT
(CAULK AS REQUIRED)
VARIES
T

CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION

PER SITE PLAN
12" TYP
ALL EDGES 6" 6"
8"
#4 @ 18" OC

BOTH WAYS
3"

NOT TO SCALE

NATIVE SOIL

COMPACTED TO
95% REL. DENSITY
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

STRUCTURAL DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-11
32 41
6/17/2024 10:26 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-11 STRUCTURAL DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

CITY STANDARD DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-12
33 41
6/17/2024 10:26 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-12 CITY STANDARD DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION PROJECT CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA

DETAILS

CITY STANDARD DETAILS
AJG
91160

PPI KMM
MAY 2024
261921012
D-13
34 41
6/17/2024 10:27 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261921012-Treatment at Well 7\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\D-13 CITY STANDARD DETAILS.dwg -Alex Gong

12. REFER TO DETAIL 3 ON SHEET D-6 FOR MASONRY WALL SECTIONS THAT

RETAIN FILL

13. TREAT ENTIRE MASONRY BLOCK SURFACE WITH TAGPROOF ANTI-GRAFFITI

COATING OR APPROVED EQUAL
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24
126
Section 10, Item 10E.

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR S EE
BFP

IR D S SS SS SS SS SS SS IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR W W W W W W W W W

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 E0.1

OVERALL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN

ELECTRICAL LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS
GENERAL AND COMPLIANCE NOTES 35
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 127
Section 10, Item 10E.
o o o o o

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 E1.0

PARTIAL ELECTRICAL
SITE PLAN 36
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 128
Section 10, Item 10E.

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 E2.0

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
AND SCHEDULES 37
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 129
Section 10, Item 10E.

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 E2.1

PEDESTAL, RTU & PLC ELEVATIONS
AND
ELECTRICAL DETAILS 38
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 130
Section 10, Item 10E.

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 E2.2 ELECTRICAL DETAILS 39
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 131
Section 10, Item 10E.

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 M I0-01 ABBREVEATION AND SYMBOLS 40
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 132
Section 10, Item 10E.

TCP TREATMENT PROJECT

CITY OF FOWLER

FOWLER, CA BID SET
MAY 2024 PEZZONI ENGINEERING, INC. ã Copyrighted 2022 1150 9TH Street Suite #1415 Modesto, CA 95354 PHONE: 209 . 554 . 4602 HTTP://WWW.PEZENGR.COM 41 IO-02 PROCESS CONTROL TREATMENT PLANT 41
COF BUILDING SAFETY 7/30/24 133
Section 10, Item 10E.

Item
No.

Quantity Unit Item Description Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 1 LS
Mobilization/Demobilization,
Bonds, Insurance, and Permits $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $248,000.00 $248,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 2 1 LS Traffic Control $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 1 LS Dust Control Plan $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 4 2 LS
Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 5 3 LS Worker Protection $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 6 1 LS
Treatment Site Demolition, Clearing,
and Grubbing $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $14,200.00 $14,200.00 7 1 LS Site Grading $65,000.00 $65,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $81,800.00 $81,800.00 8 1 LS Class II Aggregate Base Surfacing $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $115,000.00 $115,000.00 $72,100.00 $72,100.00 9 1 LS Off-Site Piping $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $355,000.00 $355,000.00 $312,400.00 $312,400.00 10 1 LS Site Piping $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $355,000.00 $355,000.00 $317,900.00 $317,900.00 11 1 LS 12’ Diameter GAC Vessels, 3 Pairs $1,800,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $1,870,000.00 $1,870,000.00 $1,860,800.00 $1,860,800.00 12 1 LS GAC Vessel Pad $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $167,000.00 $167,000.00 13 1 LS Concrete Driveway $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $104,300.00 $104,300.00 14 1 LS
Backwash/Storm Drain Disposal
System
$100,000.00 $100,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $145,800.00 $145,800.00 15 1 LS Chemical Storage Building and Pad $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $67,000.00 $67,000.00 16 1 LS
Chlorination Equipment (Pumps,
Tank, and Analyzers) $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 17 775 LF 6’ Masonry Wall $350.00 $271,250.00 $375.00 $290,625.00 $440.00 $341,000.00 18 1 LS Access Gates $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $11,300.00 $11,300.00 $31,900.00 $31,900.00 19 1 LS
Electrical, Instrumentation, and
Control $600,000.00 $600,000.00 $414,180.00 $414,180.00 $483,100.00 $483,100.00 20 1 LS
Access Road Demolition, Clearing
and Grubbing $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $24,400.00 $24,400.00 21 567 CY
Roadway Excavation and Subgrade
Prep (F) $50.00 $28,350.00 $125.00 $70,875.00 $110.00 $62,370.00 22 1,387 TN Access Road Class II Aggregate Base $120.00 $166,440.00 $40.00 $55,480.00 $70.00 $97,090.00 23 1,266 LF Concrete Valley Gutter $50.00 $63,300.00 $40.00 $50,640.00 $100.00 $126,600.00 24 1 LS
Concrete Drive Approach Wing
replacement with Curb Drains $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $700.00 $700.00 $19,400.00 $19,400.00 CITY OF FOWLER - WELL 7 TCP MITIGATION
BID SUMMARY - 10/29/2024
W.M. Lyles Co.
#1 #2
HPS Mechanical, Inc.

Engineer's Estimate
TOTAL BASE BID $4,264,340.00 $4,356,800.00 $4,630,160.00 Bid Schedule
134
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler
Well 7 TCP Mitigation
Issued for Bid - September 24, 2024

CONTRACT
00 52 13-1
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/29a896b1-452b-4653-a1fcef27a605f477/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_41.ppeng.egnyte.com/00 52 13 Contract (LS Redline) 4866-1817-2383 1.docx SECTION 00 52 13

CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT (“Contract”) is made at the City of Fowler, in the County of Fresno, California, by and between hereinafter called the “Contractor,”
and the City of Fowler, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the “Owner”.

Contractor and the Owner, for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows:

ARTICLE I. SCOPE OF WORK. The Work to be constructed is a project entitled the Well 7 TCP Mitigation (“Project”), located in the City of Fowler, Fresno County, State of California, and as further described in the Scope of Work in the Contract Documents.

The Contractor shall furnish all labor and materials, including tools, implements, and appliances required, and shall perform all the Work in a good and workmanlike manner, free from any and all liens and claims including those of mechanics, materialmen, sub-contractors, artisans, machinists, teamsters, draymen and laborers required for the construction of the Project.

Contractor shall comply with and construct the Project in strict conformity with the Contract Documents, including that set of Plans, entitled: "Well 7 TCP Mitigation,” all other Plans, Drawings, Specifications; and the provisions of this Contract.

ARTICLE II. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The Contract Documents shall consist of the following documents, each of which is on file in the office of the Owner and all of which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference thereto: this Contract, including, Division 0 – Bidding and Contract Requirements, Division 1 - General Requirements, Division 2 through Division 33 - Technical Specifications, any Standard Specifications referenced, Plans, Profiles and Drawings, Addenda or Change Orders (if any), and Appendices. In the event of conflict between portions of the Contract Documents, refer to Section 01 00 05 – Specifications to resolve priority.

ARTICLE III. PAYMENT. In the manner, at the time and upon the conditions stated in the Contract Documents, Owner agrees to pay the Contractor in current funds for the performance of the Contract the sum of:
(Figures in Words)
(Figures in Numbers)
It is understood that said price is based upon the estimated quantities of materials to be used as set forth in the Bidder’s Proposal, except where provisions are made in the Contract Documents whereby the estimated quantities shall constitute the final quantity.

Contractor is responsible for payment of prevailing wages in accordance with the provisions of Section 1770, et seq. of the Labor Code. Prevailing wage schedules for Fresno County are available from the Department of Industrial Relations-Division of Labor Statistics & Research via the Internet at www.dir.ca.gov. A prevailing wage scale is also on file in the office of the City of Fowler, 128 S Fifth Street, Fowler CA 93625, and copies may be obtained upon request. 135
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler
Well 7 TCP Mitigation
Issued for Bid - September 24, 2024

CONTRACT
00 52 13-2
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/29a896b1-452b-4653-a1fcef27a605f477/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_41.ppeng.egnyte.com/00 52 13 Contract (LS Redline) 4866-1817-2383 1.docx ARTICLE IV. TERMINATION. If the Contractor should be adjudged as bankrupt, or if he should make a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his insolvency, or if he or any of his sub-contractors should violate any of the provisions, including, but not limited to, failure to meet the time of commencement and time of completion requirements in Section 00 52 13, of the Contract Documents, or if he should refuse or fail, except in cases for which extension of time is provided, to supply enough properly skilled workmen or proper materials, or if he should fail to make prompt payment to sub-contractors or for material or labor, or disregard laws, ordinances or the instructions of the Engineer, then the Owner may serve written notice upon the Contractor and his surety of material breach and its intention to terminate the Contract, such notice to contain the reasons for such intention to terminate the contract, and unless, within seven (7) days after the serving of such notice, Contractor performs as required by the Contract Documents or makes valid objection to termination, the contract shall, upon the expiration of said seven days, cease and terminate. If Contractor does not perform or make valid objection in response to such notice, then it waives all rights to perform the contract, to submit a claim for costs caused by the Owner’s performance of the contract, or to object to the Owner withholding its costs in performing the contract.

In the event of any such termination, the Owner may immediately take over performance of the contract and prosecute the work to completion as provided below, if immediate action is required because exigent circumstances are reasonably determined to exist by the Owner, or serve written notice thereof upon the surety and the Contractor, and the surety shall have the right to take over and perform the contract, provided, however, that if the surety within seven (7) days after the serving upon it of notice of termination does not give the Owner written notice of its intention to take over and perform the contract or does not commence performance thereof within the seven (7) days stated above from the date of the serving of such notice, the Owner may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by force account, either with its own forces or with a contractor of its choice, or by any other method it may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of the Contractor, and the Contractor and his surety shall be liable to the Owner for any excess cost occasioned the Owner thereby, and in such event the Owner may without liability for doing so, take possession of and utilize in completing the work such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to the Contractor as may be on the site of the Work and necessary therefore. In such case the Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the work is finished. If the unpaid balance of the contract price shall exceed the expenses of finishing the Work, including compensation for additional managerial and administrative services, such excess shall be paid to the Contractor. If the expense shall exceed such unpaid balance, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the Owner. The expense incurred by the Owner, as herein provided and damage incurred through the Contractor's default, shall be certified by the Engineer.

When the contract has been terminated as provided above or elsewhere in the Contract Documents, such termination shall not affect any rights of the Owner against the Contractor then existing or which may thereafter accrue.

ARTICLE V. SUSPENSION OF WORK. At any time and without cause, Owner may suspend the Work or any portion thereof for a period of not more than ninety (90) consecutive days by written notice to Contractor and Engineer. Such notice will fix the date on which Work will be resumed.

Contractor shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. Contractor shall be entitled to an extension 136
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler
Well 7 TCP Mitigation
Issued for Bid - September 24, 2024

CONTRACT
00 52 13-3
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/29a896b1-452b-4653-a1fcef27a605f477/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_41.ppeng.egnyte.com/00 52 13 Contract (LS Redline) 4866-1817-2383 1.docx of the Contract Times. Contractor may be entitled to an adjustment in the Contract Price that is directly attributable to any such suspension. A Change Proposal seeking adjustments in the Contract Price shall be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the date fixed for resumption of Work.

ARTICLE VI. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION. Contractor represents that he has secured the payment of Worker's Compensation in compliance with the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and during the performance of the Work will so to comply with the said provisions of said Code. Contractor shall supply the Owner with certificates of insurance, in triplicate, evidencing that Worker's Compensation Insurance is in effect and providing that the Owner will receive ten (10) days’ notice of cancellation. If Contractor self-insures Worker's Compensation, Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure should be provided the Owner.

ARTICLE VII. JOB SITE CONDITIONS. Contractor shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of the project Work, including safety of all persons and property; and that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours.

ARTICLE VIII. CHANGES IN THE WORK. New and unforeseen work will be classed as extra work when determined by the Owner that such work is not covered by any of the various items or combination of such items for which there is a bid price. In the event that portions of such work are determined by the Owner to be covered by some of the various items or combinations of such items for which there is a bid price, the remaining portion of such work will be classified as extra work. Extra work also includes work specifically designated as extra work in the Plans and Specifications. Refer to Section 00 72 00 – General Conditions, Article 4.

ARTICLE IX. COMPLETION. Upon receipt of written notice that the Work is ready for final review, the Engineer and Owner will promptly make such review, and when the Owner finds the Work satisfactory under the Contract and the Contract fully performed, the Owner will promptly issue a Notice of Completion stating that the Work required by this Contract has been completed.

Within ten (10) days of acceptance, the Owner shall cause the Notice of Completion to be recorded. Final payment shall become due thirty-five (35) days after the date of the recording of the Notice of Completion.

Before issuance of final payment, the Contractor shall submit Conditional Releases as specified in Section 00 52 21 – Waiver and Release Submittals, except that, in the case of disputed indebtedness or liens, the Contractor may submit, in lieu of evidence of payment, a Surety Bond satisfactory to the Owner guaranteeing payment of all such disputed amounts when adjudicated.

ARTICLE X. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Notice to Proceed is specified in Section 00 55 00 – Notice to Proceed. Beginning of Work and Time of Completion are specified in Section 01 11 00 – Description of Work and Schedule Constraints. Liquidated Damages are those specified in Section 00 52 15 – Liquidated Damages. All time limits stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence.
137
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler
Well 7 TCP Mitigation
Issued for Bid - September 24, 2024

CONTRACT
00 52 13-4
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/29a896b1-452b-4653-a1fcef27a605f477/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_41.ppeng.egnyte.com/00 52 13 Contract (LS Redline) 4866-1817-2383 1.docx ARTICLE XI. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE. Contractor shall indemnify Owner in accordance with the provisions of Section 00 73 15 – Indemnity Agreement. Prior to commencing Work, the Contractor shall obtain at his own expense, and agrees to keep in effect during the life of this Contract, as a minimum requirement, the insurance described in Section 00 73 16 – Insurance Requirements. The Contractor shall furnish evidence of the required insurance coverages to the Owner prior to execution of the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE XII. ASSIGNMENT OF CLAYTON ACT AND CARTWRIGHT ACT RIGHTS.

Per Government Code Section 4552, in submitting its Bid and entering into the Contract or a subcontract to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract, the Contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the Owner all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract or any subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the Owner tenders final payment to the Contractor, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

ARTICLE XIII. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF CONTRACT. The Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Contract or any part thereof or any interest therein without consent in writing of the Owner and the Contractor's Surety, and any such assignment or transfer without such written consent shall be null and void.

ARTICLE XIV. CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Claims and disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the provisions of Public Contracts Code Section 9204, as set forth in Section 00 64 00 of these specifications.

ARTICLE XV. HEADINGS AND INTERPRETATION. The headings in the Contract Documents are solely for the convenience of the parties, and are not intended to and shall not be construed to in any way limit Contractor’s duties with respect to the performance of the Work as provided in the Contract Documents. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in the language of this Contract or the Contract Documents shall not be construed against the party drafting the same, but shall be construed as if both parties prepared the same and any provision to the contrary in Civil Code § 1654 is waived by the parties.

ARTICLE XVI. REMEDIES . The remedies given to Owner in the Contract Documents shall not be exclusive, but shall be cumulative and in addition to all remedies now or hereafter allowed by law.

If any provision of the Contract Documents is void or unenforceable, the same shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of the Contract Documents or the validity or enforceability of this Contract as a whole.

This Contract shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, as well as their respective heirs, successors and assigns.
138
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler
Well 7 TCP Mitigation
Issued for Bid - September 24, 2024

CONTRACT
00 52 13-5
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/29a896b1-452b-4653-a1fcef27a605f477/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_41.ppeng.egnyte.com/00 52 13 Contract (LS Redline) 4866-1817-2383 1.docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, they had executed this Contract this day of , 2024.

City of Fowler
Contractor Owner
By By
Thomas W. Gaffery IV, Interim City Manager
By
2nd Signatory if Needed, Title
ATTEST:

END SECTION
139
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 1

CITY OF FOWLER

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Contract Services Agreement for Professional Services ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Fowler, a California general law city ("City") and Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc., d.b.a., Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group ("Vendor") with respect to the following recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective on January 21, 2025 ("Effective Date").

RECITALS
A. City desires to engage the services of a qualified vendor to Construction Management and Observation Services, Well 7 TCP Mitigation Project ("Services") more fully described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

B. Vendor is engaged in the business of providing these Services and hereby warrants and represents that Vendor is qualified, experienced, and capable of providing these Services, and possesses any required licenses, certifications, security/bonding, and/or training necessary thereto.

C. City desires to contract with Vendor to provide these Services on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein, City and Vendor agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Work. Vendor agrees to perform the services as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”). Changes in the scope of Services, including work incidental to the Services, shall be made in writing and particularly describe the changes in Services, payment/costs, and schedule/term, as applicable.

2. Schedule. City and Vendor shall mutually agree on a schedule for performing the Services. The schedule shall be subject to modification based on the City’s operational needs. City will notify Vendor in advance of any modification to the schedule.

3. Term of Agreement; Commencement of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall terminate on December 31, 2025, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, this Agreement may be terminated during the term in accordance with Section 17 herein.

4. Payment for Services. City shall pay Vendor for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement on a time and materials basis. The total amount paid by City to Vendor pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed One Hundred Ninety-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-Five Dollars ($192,745).

The foregoing is inclusive of all labor, equipment, materials, costs and expenses, taxes, and overhead. City shall pay Vendor for Services satisfactorily performed pursuant to this Agreement. Vendor shall submit an invoice to City containing detailed billing information regarding the Services provided and City shall tender payment to Vendor within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice.

5. Independent Contractor Status. Vendor and its subcontractors, if any, shall perform the Services as independent contractors and not as officers, employees, agents or volunteers of City. Vendor is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business to perform the Services required by this Agreement 140
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 2
and is hereby retained to perform work that is outside the usual course of City’s business. Vendor is free from the control and direction of City in connection with the manner of performance of the work. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to create any contractual relationship between City and Vendor’s employees or subcontractors, nor shall anything contained in this Agreement be deemed to give any third party, including but not limited to Vendor’s employees or subcontractors, any claim or right of action against City.

6. Vendor Representations; Standard of Care; Compliance with Law. Vendor represents that Vendor and any subcontractors utilized by Vendor are and will be qualified in the field for which Services are being provided under this Agreement, and Vendor and any subcontractors are now, and will be throughout their performance of the Services under this Agreement, properly licensed, certified, secured/bonded, trained, and/or otherwise qualified and authorized to perform the Services required and contemplated by this Agreement, as may be required by law. Vendor and its subcontractors shall utilize the standard of care and skill customarily exercised by members of their profession, shall use reasonable diligence and best judgment while performing the Services, and shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards, including anti-discrimination and anti-harassment laws. Vendor shall comply with all Labor Code requirements for public works projects if applicable to Vendor’s work under this Agreement.

7. [Reserved]

8. Subcontractor Provisions. Vendor shall include in its written agreements with its subcontractors, if any, provisions which: (a) impose upon the subcontractors the obligation to provide to City the same insurance and indemnity obligations that Vendor owes to City; (b) make clear that City intends to rely upon the reports, opinions, conclusions and other work product prepared and performed by subcontractors for Vendor; and (c) entitle City to impose upon subcontractors the assignment rights found elsewhere in this Agreement.

9. Power to Act on Behalf of City. Vendor is not acting as an agent of City and shall not have any right, power, or authority to create any obligation, express or implied, or make representations on behalf of City except as may be expressly authorized in advance in writing from time to time by City and then only to the extent of such authorization.

10. Record Keeping; Reports. Vendor shall keep complete records showing the type of Services performed. Vendor shall be responsible and shall require its subcontractors to keep similar records. City shall be given reasonable access to the records of Vendor and its subcontractors for inspection and audit purposes.

Vendor shall provide City with a working draft of all reports upon reasonable request by City and of all final reports prepared by Vendor under this Agreement.

11. [Reserved]

12. [Reserved]

13. City Name and Logo. Vendor shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to the City projects or work for which Vendor’s services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Vendor’s Services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, internet website, social media, or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

14. Conflicts of Interest. Vendor warrants that neither Vendor nor any of its employees have an improper interest, present or contemplated, in the Services which would affect Vendor’s or its employees’ performance of the Services. Vendor further warrants that neither Vendor nor any of its employees have real property, business interests or income that will be affected by the Services. Vendor covenants that no person having any such interest, whether an employee or subcontractor shall perform the Services under this Agreement. During the performance of the Services, Vendor shall not employ or retain the services of any person who is employed 141
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 3
by the City or a member of any City Board or Commission.

15. Non-liability of Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Vendor, or any successors in interest, in the event of a default or breach by City for any amount which may become due Vendor or its successor, or for any breach of any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

16. City Right to Employ Other Vendors. Unless Exhibit A specifically provides that the Services City seeks pursuant to this Agreement are exclusive to Vendor, this Agreement and the performance of the Services are non-exclusive and City reserves the right to employ other vendors or contractors in connection with the Services while this Agreement is in effect.

17. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate as provided in Section 3, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the following:
a. Termination by City: For Convenience. City may at its discretion terminate this Agreement for convenience and without cause upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Vendor. Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant to this subsection, Vendor shall promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice directs otherwise.
b. Termination by City or Vendor: For Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party of a material breach, and a failure within that time period to cure or commence reasonable steps to cure the breach.
c. Compensation to Vendor Upon Termination. Vendor shall be paid compensation for Services satisfactorily performed prior to notice of termination. As to any phase partially performed but for which the applicable portion of Vendor’s compensation has not become due, Vendor shall be paid the reasonable value of its Services provided. However, in no event shall such payment when added to any other payment due under the applicable part of the work exceed the total compensation of such part as specified Section 4. In the event of termination due to Vendor’s failure to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of City, City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to City's damages caused by such failure.
d. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, Vendor shall promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice of termination directs otherwise.

18. Insurance. Vendor shall satisfy the insurance requirements set forth in Exhibit B.

19. Indemnity and Defense. Vendor hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, damages, losses, expenses, and other liabilities, (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the alleged or actual acts, errors, omissions or negligence of Vendor or its subcontractors relating to the performance of Services described herein to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless the injuries or damages are the result of City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, subject to any limitations imposed by law. Vendor and City agree that said indemnity and defense obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any items specified herein that arose or occurred during the term of this Agreement.

20. Taxes. Vendor agrees to pay all taxes, licenses, and fees levied or assessed by any governmental agency on Vendor as a result of the sale of the Equipment and/or performance of Services under this Agreement, and unemployment and workers’ compensation insurance, social security, or any other taxes upon the wages of Vendor, its employees, agents, and representatives. Vendor agrees to obtain and maintain a 142
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 4
business license from City and pay the applicable business license fee to City during the term of this Agreement.

21. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations hereunder shall be assignable by Vendor without the prior written consent of City. In the event of an assignment to which City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing to personally assume and perform the covenants, obligations, and agreements herein contained. In addition, Vendor shall not assign the payment of any monies due Vendor from City under the terms of this Agreement to any other individual, corporation or entity. City retains the right to pay any and all monies due Vendor directly to Vendor.

22. Form and Service of Notices. Any and all notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be delivered to, served upon, or given to either party to this Agreement by the other party shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered, served or given by one of the following methods:
a. Personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery.
b. Delivered by e-mail to a known address of the party to whom it is directed provided the e-mail is accompanied by an acknowledgment of receipt by the other party. Service shall be deemed the date of acknowledgement.
c. Delivery by a reliable overnight delivery service, ex., Federal Express, receipted, addressed to the addressees set forth below the signatories to this Agreement. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery. d. Delivery by deposit in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid. Service shall be deemed delivered ninety-six (96) hours after deposit.

23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any referenced Exhibits, represents the entire agreement between City and Vendor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral with respect to the subject matter herein.

24. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

25. Authority. The signatories to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the legal right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement and bind their respective entities.

26. Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is declared to be invalid or illegal for any reason, this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will be interpreted as though such invalid or illegal provision were not a part of this Agreement. The remaining provisions will be construed to preserve the intent and purpose of this Agreement and the parties will negotiate in good faith to modify any invalidated provisions to preserve each party’s anticipated benefits.

27. Applicable Law and Interpretation and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. This Agreement is entered into by City and Vendor in the County of Fresno, California. Vendor shall perform the Services required under this Agreement in the County of Fresno, California. Thus, in the event of litigation, venue shall only lie with the appropriate state or federal court in Fresno County. 143
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 5

28. Amendments and Waiver. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended in any way, and no provision shall be waived, except in writing signed by the parties hereto. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

29. Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to confer any rights upon any party not a signatory to this Agreement.

30. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts such that the signatures may appear on separate signature pages. A copy or an original, with all signatures appended together, shall be deemed a fully executed Agreement.

31. Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises out of or relating to this Agreement, or the alleged breach thereof, and if said dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, the parties agree first to try in good faith to settle the dispute by non-binding mediation before resorting to litigation. The mediator shall be mutually selected by the parties, but in case of disagreement, the mediator shall be selected by lot from among two nominations provided by each party. All costs and fees required by the mediator shall be split equally by the parties, otherwise each party shall bear its own costs of mediation. If mediation fails to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days, either party may pursue litigation to resolve the dispute.

Demand for mediation shall be in writing and delivered to the other party to this Agreement.

A demand for mediation shall be made within reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for mediation be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such a claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by California statues of limitations.

32. Non-Discrimination. Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of any protected class under federal or State law in the provision of the Services or with respect to any Contractor employees or applicants for employment. Contractor shall ensure that any subcontractors are bound to this provision. A protected class, includes, but is not necessarily limited to race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, and disability.

Now, therefore, the City and Vendor have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below.

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CITY OF FOWLER

CONSULTING GROUP
__________________________
Soo Ho Park Thomas W. Gaffery IV
Director of Operations Interim City Manager
Date: Date:
455 West Fir Avenue 128 South 5th Street
Clovis, CA 93611 Fowler, CA 93625
144
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 6

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
145
Section 10, Item 10E.
400 E Main St, Ste 300 • Visalia, CA 93291 • (559) 636-1166 www.provostandpritchard.com
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/cf0f338b-7564-4862-83ab93359e551855/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_92.ppeng.egnyte.com/P&P Fowler Well 7 CM Proposal_Rev 2.docx Engineering • Structural • Geostructural • Surveying • Planning • Environmental • GIS • Construction Services • Hydrogeology • Consulting Clovis • Visalia • Bakersfield • Modesto • Los Banos • Chico • Sacramento • Sonora • San Luis Obispo • Boise, ID October 18, 2024
Thomas Gaffery
Interim City Manager
City of Fowler
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
Subject: Construction Management and Observation Services, Well 7 TCP Mitigation Project Dear Thomas Gaffery:

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide Construction Management and Observation services for the subject project. This proposal discusses our understanding of the project, recommends a scope of services together with associated fees, deliverables and approximate schedules, and sets forth our assumptions.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
We understand the City of Fowler will be constructing a new GAC treatment facility for TCP at APNs 343-030- 16 and 343-030-17, near City Well #7. Planned improvements include transmission pipelines, on-site chlorination facilities, a storage basin, and access road improvements. The contract duration of the construction phase of this project is two hundred and fifteen (215) working days. Construction drawings and specifications have been provided by Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group and approved by the City of Fowler. The City plans to retain a General Contractor under a prime agreement for construction of this project.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group CM staff will represent the City’s interest and provide effective oversight of the project contract, schedule, cost, and quality as detailed below.

Construction Management Services:

1. Act as the City’s primary point of contact with Contractor.

2. Coordinate the efforts of the City, design engineer, and contractor.

3. Conduct regular construction progress meetings.

4. Establish and maintain a SharePoint project website with City access.

5. Provide project document control.

6. Assist with technical reviews, RFI responses, and preparing contract change orders.

7. Review and process monthly progress payments for signature and issuance by the City. 146
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler October 18, 2024
Construction Management and Observation Services, Well 7 TCP Mitigation Project Page 2 of 3 https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/cf0f338b-7564-4862-83ab93359e551855/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_92.ppeng.egnyte.com/P&P Fowler Well 7 CM Proposal_Rev 2.docx

8. Provide part-time construction observation by a qualified construction field representative, including daily reports and photos.

9. Coordinate special inspection requirements with the City’s consultant.

10. Develop and submit the final punch list and project closeout checklist to the contractor and track it’s completion.

Deliverables:

1. SharePoint Project Web Hosting

2. Daily Observation Reports (electronic pdf)

3. Meeting Minutes (electronic pdf)

4. Final Punch List (electronic pdf)

PROFESSIONAL FEES
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group will perform CM services on a time and materials basis, in accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule in effect at the time services are rendered. For budgeting purposes, our preliminary estimate of fees is $192,745.00. These fees will be invoiced monthly as they are accrued.

Reimbursable expenses will be invoiced in addition to professional fees. If it appears we will need to exceed the upper range above, we will notify you in writing before we do so and will provide a revised estimate. We will not continue work beyond the initial budget without additional authorization.

Proposed Fee – CM Services
CM Services Estimated Fee
Construction Inspector $170,250
Senior Construction Manager $16,995
Mileage $5,500
Total Estimated Fee: $192,745

SCHEDULE
Once we receive an executed copy of this Proposal together with the signed Consultant Services Agreement and are authorized to proceed, we will provide part-time management and observation services (approximately 3 days per week) for the duration of the project (215 working days).

ASSUMPTIONS

1. This proposal is based on the City of Fowler’s approved construction drawings and specifications prepared by Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, dated May 2024.

2. Construction observation services will be provided on a part-time basis relative to the rate of construction activity. Observation services are estimated at 16 -24 hours per week, with construction progress meetings planned bi-weekly.
147
Section 10, Item 10E.

City of Fowler October 18, 2024
Construction Management and Observation Services, Well 7 TCP Mitigation Project Page 3 of 3 https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/cf0f338b-7564-4862-83ab93359e551855/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_92.ppeng.egnyte.com/P&P Fowler Well 7 CM Proposal_Rev 2.docx

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
To convey a clear understanding of our mutual responsibilities under this proposal, the executed agreement between the City and Provost & Pritchard for On-Call Engineering Services, fully executed on January 17, 2023, is made a part of this proposal, by reference and all terms and conditions apply. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign below, and return a copy to our office. These documents will serve as our Notice to Proceed. This proposal is valid for 30 days from the date above.

Sincerely Yours,
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Ben Crawford Soo Ho Park, RCE 89361
Senior Construction Manager Director of Operations

TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCEPTED
By City of Fowler
Signature
Printed Name
Title Date
148
Section 10, Item 10E.

021023tg 7

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Prior to commencement of the Services, Vendor shall take out and maintain at its own expense the insurance coverage required by this Exhibit C. Vendor shall cause any subcontractor with whom Vendor contracts for the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement to take out and maintain equivalent insurance coverage. Said insurance shall be maintained at all times during Vendor’s performance of Services under this Agreement, and for any additional period specified herein. All insurance shall be placed with insurance companies that are licensed and admitted to conduct business in the State of California and are rated at a minimum with an "A:VII" by A.M. Best Company, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Vendor shall maintain the following types of insurance with limits no less than specified:
(i) General Liability Insurance (including operations, products and completed operations coverages) in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (ii) Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California. (iii) Automobile Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(iv) Umbrella or Excess Liability. In the event Vendor purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the “Minimum Limits of Insurance,” this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies). In addition, such Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
(v) Professional Liability. Contractor shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing the Services to be rendered in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this agreement, and Contractor agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the services required by this agreement.

If Vendor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be entitled to coverage at the higher limits maintained.
b. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(i) The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as insured's with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the Vendor; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Vendor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Vendor’s insurance (at least as broad 149
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 8
as ISO Form 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
(ii) For any claims related to the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Vendor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Vendor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (iii) Each insurance policy required by this section shall be endorsed to state that the City shall receive written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the cancellation, non-renewal, or material modification of the coverages required herein.
(iv) Vendor grants to the City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Vendor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Vendor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. (v) Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Fowler Risk Services. The City may require the Vendor to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
c. Evidence of Coverage. Vendor shall deliver to City written evidence of the above insurance coverages, including the required endorsements prior to commencing Services under this Agreement; and the production of such written evidence shall be an express condition precedent, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, to Vendor’s right to be paid any compensation under this Agreement. City's failure, at any time, to object to Vendor’s failure to provide the specified insurance or written evidence thereof (either as to the type or amount of such insurance), shall not be deemed a waiver of City's right to insist upon such insurance later.
d. Maintenance of Insurance. If Vendor fails to furnish and maintain the insurance required by this section, City may (but is not required to) purchase such insurance on behalf of Vendor, and the Vendor shall pay the cost thereof to City upon demand, and City shall furnish Vendor with any information needed to obtain such insurance. Moreover, at its discretion, City may pay for such insurance with funds otherwise due Vendor under this Agreement.
e. Subcontractors. If the Vendor should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed in this Agreement, the Vendor shall cover the subcontractor, and/or require each subcontractor to adhere to all the requirements contained herein. Similarly, any cancellation, lapse, reduction or change of subcontractor’s insurance shall have the same impact as described above. f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
g. Indemnity and Defense. Except as otherwise expressly provided, the insurance requirements in this section shall not in any way limit, in either scope or amount, the indemnity and defense obligations separately owed by Vendor to City under this Agreement. 150
Section 10, Item 10E.
021023tg 9

EXHIBIT C

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
151
Section 10, Item 10E.

RESOLUTION NO. 2765

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER

APPROVING AND ADOPTING BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 1,2,3-TCP TREATMENT PLANT MITIGATION PROJECT AT WELL NO. 7 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
WHEREAS, the FY 2024/2025 Annual Budget reflects the City of Fowler’s ongoing commitment to providing core services; and
WHEREAS, the FY 2024/2025 Annual Budget was approved by the City Council on June 4, 2024, by Resolution 2717, and any subsequent amendments must be approved by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, a budget amendment is necessary to adjust expenses for additional funding for the construction of the 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7 (Project); and
WHEREAS, the budget amendment attached hereto as Attachment A specifies the additional funding for the Project to be expensed in the TCP Fund and Water Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Fowler City Council hereby resolves that the FY 2024/2025 budget be amended as described in Attachment A hereto to provide the necessary funding to various funds.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January 2025, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
152
Section 10, Item 10E.

ATTACHMENT A

REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT
Requested by: Margarita Moreno Budget Amounts
Account Numbers: Fund Name Description Increase Decrease Revenues
500 Water Fund Balance $ 547,001
503 TCP Fund Balance $ 1,704,562
Expenses
5000-5710 Water- Improvements $ 547,001
5030-5710 TCP-Improvements $ 1,704,562
Reason(s) for Budget Amendment:

Finance Director
Signature Date
City Manager
Signature Date
City Council: Approved Resolution #__________ Denied
Journal Entry No. _______________ Date Posted ___________ By: ____________________________ Resolution No. 2765
To align expenses and revenues to the FY 2024/25 budget, staff request budget amendments to the following fund:

General Fund Expenses:

TCP-Improvement Expense, $1,704,562: To adjust addtional funding for the 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7 Water Fund-Improvements: $547,001: To adjust additional funding for the 1,2,3-TCP Treatment Plant Mitigation Project at Well No. 7 153
Section 10, Item 10E.

Fowler City CouncilJanuary 21, 2025

Fowler City Council
January 21, 2025