Agenda packet — Fowler City Council, May 6, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

APPENDIX C - IPAC SPECIES LIST
355
Section , Item D
02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:

Project Code: 2025-0057192
Project Name: Clayton Avenue Industrial Subdivision
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 356
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
2 of 8
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultationhandbook.pdf Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/whatwe-do.

The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.

In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservationmigratory-birds.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.
357
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
3 of 8
▪
Attachment(s):

Official Species List

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600
358
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
4 of 8

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2025-0057192
Project Name: Clayton Avenue Industrial Subdivision
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Annexation and re-zoning for residential and industrial purposes.

Project Location:

The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@36.6400021,-119.68718307859262,14z Counties: Fresno County, California
359
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
5 of 8

1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
1 360
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
6 of 8

MAMMALS

NAME STATUS
Fresno Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5150
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
BIRDS

NAME STATUS
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
Population: Western U.S. DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened

REPTILES

NAME STATUS
Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Gambelia silus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/625
Endangered
Northwestern Pond Turtle Actinemys marmorata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1111
Proposed
Threatened

AMPHIBIANS

NAME STATUS
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
Population: U.S.A. (Central CA DPS)
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
Western Spadefoot Spea hammondii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5425
Proposed
Threatened

INSECTS

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Proposed
Threatened
361
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
7 of 8

CRUSTACEANS

NAME STATUS
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

CRITICAL HABITATS

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.

YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
362
Section , Item D
Project code: 2025-0057192 02/14/2025 23:20:39 UTC
8 of 8

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Kira McCall
Address: 1518 Mill Rock Way
Address Line 2: Ste 100
City: Bakersfield
State: CA
Zip: 93311
Email [email protected]
Phone: 6616165900
363
Section , Item D

APPENDIX D - NRCS SOILS REPORT
364
Section , Item D
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
February 14, 2025365
Section , Item D
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.

They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.

Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.

The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 366
Section , Item D
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 367
Section , Item D
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 DhA—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17..........................13 Hc—Hanford sandy loam............................................................................14 Hsd—Hesperia sandy loam, very deep.......................................................15 Hsr—Hesperia fine sandy loam, very deep.................................................16 References............................................................................................................19 4 368
Section , Item D
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).

Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 369
Section , Item D
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.

The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.

These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.

Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 370
Section , Item D
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Custom Soil Resource Report
7 371
Section , Item D
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 372
Section , Item D
9 Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4058080 4058160 4058240 4058320 4058400 4058480 4058560 4058080 4058160 4058240 4058320 4058400 4058480
259120 259200 259280 259360 259440 259520 259600 259680 259760 259840 259120 259200 259280 259360 259440 259520 259600 259680 259760 259840 36° 38' 31'' N
119° 41' 40'' W
36° 38' 31'' N
119° 41' 9'' W
36° 38' 15'' N
119° 41' 40'' W
36° 38' 15'' N N 119° 41' 9'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Meters
Map Scale: 1:3,560 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
373
Section , Item D

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:

Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Aug 30, 2024
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2022—May 30, 2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
10 374
Section , Item D
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI DhA Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes, MLRA 17

0.0 0.1%
Hc Hanford sandy loam 3.2 6.8%
Hsd Hesperia sandy loam, very
deep

27.7 59.7%
Hsr Hesperia fine sandy loam, very
deep

15.5 33.4%
Totals for Area of Interest 46.4 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.

Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate Custom Soil Resource Report
11 375
Section , Item D
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.

Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.

These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.

The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
12 376
Section , Item D
Eastern Fresno Area, California
DhA—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2ss8r
Elevation: 30 to 430 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 310 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Delhi and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Delhi
Setting
Landform: Dunes on fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sandy alluvium derived from granite Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
C1 - 7 to 25 inches: loamy sand
C2 - 25 to 60 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY906CA - Non-Alkali San Joaquin Valley Desert Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
13 377
Section , Item D
Landform: Depressions on fan remnants
Hydric soil rating: No
Dello
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Depressions on fan remnants
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Hilmar
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Hc—Hanford sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl5f
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, rise Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 16 inches: sandy loam
C - 16 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
14 378
Section , Item D
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, channeled
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Channels on alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Hsd—Hesperia sandy loam, very deep
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2yc9k
Elevation: 210 to 310 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 310 to 326 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hesperia and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hesperia
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Custom Soil Resource Report
15 379
Section , Item D
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Ap2 - 5 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 32 inches: sandy loam
Btk - 32 to 60 inches: sandy loam
2Bdk - 60 to 67 inches: stratified silt loam
2Cd - 67 to 79 inches: stratified silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 60 inches to densic material Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 2.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 6.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R017XY906CA - Non-Alkali San Joaquin Valley Desert Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Hsr—Hesperia fine sandy loam, very deep
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2yc9f
Elevation: 240 to 320 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 316 to 327 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Custom Soil Resource Report
16 380
Section , Item D
Map Unit Composition
Hesperia and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hesperia
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 5 inches: fine sandy loam
Ap2 - 5 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 32 inches: fine sandy loam
Btk - 32 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam
2Bdk - 60 to 67 inches: stratified silt loam
2Cd - 67 to 79 inches: stratified silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 60 inches to densic material Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 2.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R017XY905CA - Dry Alluvial Fans and Terraces Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed, loam surface
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
17 381
Section , Item D
Custom Soil Resource Report
18 382
Section , Item D
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19 383
Section , Item D
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
20 384
Section , Item D
Appendices
Tentative Map No. 6471
February 2025 C-1
Appendix C: Cultural Resources Information
385
Section , Item D
To: Jackie Lancaster Record Search 24-414
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
400 E. Main Street, Suite 300
Visalia, CA 93291
Date: September 24, 2024
Re: City of Fowler Clayton Industrial Tentative Map Project. Project No. 2619-22-023 Phase TTM County: Fresno
Map(s): Malaga 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies completed within the project area. There have been four cultural resource studies conducted within the onehalf mile radius: FR-00135, 02287, 02452, 02642. 386
Section , Item D
Record Search 24-414

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS According to the information in our files, there are no recorded cultural resources within the project area. There are three recorded cultural resource within the one-half mile radius: P-10-002962, 003930, 004423.

These resources consist of historic era refuse scatter, a railroad, & park.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project intends to annex approximately 83.04 acres of farmland into the City of Fowler. Additionally, we understand this project would prezone approx. 30.65 acres to light industrial zone district and the remaining to future residential development, with future improvements to intersections when warranted. Further, we understand the existing project area is agricultural land. Please note that agriculture does not constitute previous development, as it does not destroy cultural resources, but merely moves them around within the plow zone. As such, there are no further cultural resource investigations needed to annex and prezone properties. However, prior to any future stages of this project that require ground disturbance, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey to determine if cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Jeremy E David, Assistant Coordinator Date: September 24, 2024 Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.
387
Section , Item D
Appendices
Tentative Map No. 6471
February 2025 D-1
Appendix D: Traffic Impact Study
388
Section , Item D
Clayton and Golden State Blvd. Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study
September 2024
Prepared for:

City of Fowler
Prepared by:

VRPA Technologies, Inc.
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93722
In Association With:

Precision Engineering
Vrpa TECHNOIOGIES. INC.
389
Section , Item D
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study
Study Team
 Georgiena Vivian, President, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (559) 259-9257
 Erik Ruehr, Dir. of Traffic Engineering, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (858) 566-1766
 Jeff Stine, Senior Transportation Planner, VRPA Technologies, Inc. [email protected], (858) 566-1766
 Nisha Pathak, Transportation Engineer, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], (559) 271-1200
390
Section , Item D
Table of Contents
Section Description Page

1.0 Introduction 1-1

1.1 Description of the Region/Project 1-1

1.1.1 Project Access 1-1

1.1.2 Study Area 1-1

1.1.3 Study Scenarios 1-2

1.2 Methodology 1-2

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis 1-2

1.2.2 Roadway Segment Analysis 1-3

1.2.3 Queuing Analysis 1-3

1.3 Policies to Maintain Level of Service 1-4

2.0 Existing Conditions 2-1

2.1 Existing Traffic Counts and Roadway Geometrics 2-1

2.2 Existing Functional Roadway Classification System 2-1

2.3 Affected Streets and Highways 2-2

2.4 Level of Service 2-6

2.4.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis 2-6

2.4.2 Queuing Analysis 2-6

2.4.3 Roadway Segment Analysis 2-7

2.5 Study Area Collision Analysis 2-7

3.0 Traffic Impacts 3-1

3.1 Trip Generation 3-1

3.2 Trip Distribution 3-1

3.3 Project Traffic 3-3

3.4 Existing Plus Project Conditions 3-3

3.5 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions 3-3

3.6 Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions 3-3

3.7 Impacts 3-3

3.7.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis 3-3

3.7.2 Queuing Analysis 3-4

3.7.3 Roadway Segment Analysis 3-4
391
Section , Item D

4.0 Roadway Improvements 4-1

4.1 Roadway Improvements 4-1

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility 4-3

Appendices
Appendix A – Roadway Functional Class and Peak Hour
Level-of-Service Thresholds
Appendix B – Traffic Counts
Appendix C – Synchro Worksheets
Appendix D – Detailed Collision Data
Appendix E – Signal Warrant Worksheets

List of Tables
1-1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions 1-8 1-2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions 1-9 1-3 Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions 1-10
1-4 Peak Hour Two-Way Segment Volume Thresholds 1-11
2-1 Existing Intersection Operations 2-8
2-2 Existing Queuing Operations 2-9
2-3 Existing Roadway Segment Operations 2-10
3-1 Project Trip Generation 3-1
3-3 Intersection Operations 3-13
3-3 Queuing Operations 3-14
3-4 Roadway Segment Operations 3-15
4-1 Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements 4-5 4-2 Left Turn and Right Turn Storage Requirements 4-6
4-3 Horizon Year Equitable Share Responsibility 4-7
List of Figures
1-1 Regional Location 1-5
1-2 Project Location 1-6
1-3 Project Site Plan 1-7
2-1 Existing Lane Geometry 2-3
2-2 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic 2-4
2-3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic 2-5
2-4 Study Area Collision Map 2-11
3-1 Trip Distribution 3-2
3-2 Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-5
392
Section , Item D
3-3 Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-6
3-4 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-7
3-5 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-8
3-6 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-9 3-7 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-10 3-8 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic 3-11 3-9 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-12 4-1 Proposed Lane Geometry 4-4

393
Section , Item D
1-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Description of the Region/Project
This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) has been prepared for the purpose of analyzing traffic conditions related to the proposed Clayton and Golden State Boulevard Property Prezone (Project) in the County of Fresno. The Project site, currently outside of the City of Fowler limits but within the City of Fowler’s sphere of influence, proposes land uses of Light Industrial and Medium Low Residential. The Annexation/Prezone proposes a prezone to M-1 and R-1-7. The Project also proposes a 44-lot industrial subdivision on the area with a land use designation of Light Industrial, which is consistent with the General Plan. The Annexation/Prezone of the subject property would affect traffic operations that may trigger the need for improvements and/or other measures within the study area to address traffic operations. The Project will be located on approximately 45.04 acres of land, south of Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and North Fowler Avenue at 5469 East Clayton Avenue, Fowler, CA (APNs 340-120-05-28, and 340-120-05-29).

Figures 1-1 and 1-2 show the location of the Project along with major roadways in the Project area. The Project site plan is provided in Figure 1-3.

1.1.1 Project Access
Site access will be provided at two Project Driveways along Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue. At the south end of the Project, Lynn Avenue dead ends at the south property line.

1.1.2 Study Area
The following intersections and roadway segments included in this TIS were determined in consultation with County of Fresno and Caltrans staff that include:

Intersections

1. American Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

2. American Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

3. Jefferson Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

6. Fowler Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

8. Clayton Avenue and Fowler Avenue

9. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 NB Ramps

10. Clayton Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

11. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 SB Ramps

12. Adams Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

13. Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

14. Merced Street and Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp
mwm.
394
Section , Item D
1-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.1.3 Study Scenarios
This TIS includes level of service (LOS) analysis for the following traffic scenarios (Study Scenarios):
 Existing Conditions
 Existing Plus Project Conditions
 Horizon Year 2044 Without Project Conditions
 Horizon Year 2044 Plus Project Conditions

1.2 Methodology
When preparing this TIS, guidelines set by the City of Fowler were followed. In analyzing street and intersection capacities, LOS methodologies from the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) were applied. The City of Fowler LOS standards were applied to quantitatively assess the performance of study area intersections and roadway segments. In addition, safety concerns were considered when determining the need for appropriate mitigation resulting from increased traffic near sensitive uses.

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis
Intersection LOS analysis was conducted using the Synchro 12 software program. Synchro 12 supports HCM 6th Edition methodologies and is an acceptable program by City of Fowler staff for assessment of traffic impacts. Levels of Service can be determined for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. All the study intersections are currently unsignalized except for two intersections (American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp) mwm.
395
Section , Item D
1-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
which do not have any intersection controls.

Tables 1-1 and 1-2 indicate the ranges in the amounts of average delay for a vehicle at signalized and unsignalized intersections for the various levels of service ranging from LOS “A” to “F”.

When an unsignalized intersection does not meet acceptable LOS standards, the investigation of the need for a traffic signal shall be evaluated. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (California MUTCD) introduces standards for determining the need for traffic signals. The California MUTCD indicates that the satisfaction of one or more traffic signal warrants does not in itself require the installation of a traffic signal. In addition to the warrant analysis, an engineering study of the current or expected traffic conditions should be conducted to determine whether the installation of a traffic signal is justified. The California MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3) was used to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at unsignalized intersections that fall below current LOS standards.

1.2.2 Roadway Segment Analysis
According to the HCM, LOS is categorized by two parameters of traffic: uninterrupted and interrupted flow. Uninterrupted flow facilities do not have fixed elements such as traffic signals that cause interruptions in traffic flow. Interrupted flow facilities do have fixed elements that cause an interruption in the flow of traffic, such as stop signs and signalized intersections along arterial roads. A roadway segment is defined as a stretch of roadway generally located between signalized or controlled intersections.

Segment LOS is important in order to understand whether the capacity of a roadway can accommodate future traffic volumes. Table 1-3 provides a definition of segment LOS. The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the road and highway system for this study were estimated using Table 5.14-2 (Roadway Functional Class and Peak Hour Levelof-Service Thresholds) from the City of Fresno General Plan and Development Code Update Master Environmental Impact Report. The tables consider the capacity of individual road and highway segments. Street segment capacity was determined using information shown in Table 1-4 based on the Level of Service Tables included in Appendix A.

1.2.3 Queuing Analysis
Queuing analysis was performed at study intersections utilizing the Synchro 12 software program. This software aligns with the methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition. Synchro provides queuing results in feet for signalized intersections while the 95th percentile queue for unsignalized intersections are expressed in number of vehicles. A vehicle length of 25 feet was applied to estimate the queue length, in feet, for unsignalized intersections.
mwm.
396
Section , Item D
1-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction

1.3 Policies to Maintain Level of Service
An important goal is to maintain an acceptable level of service along the highway, street, and road network. To accomplish this, the City of Fowler adopted minimum levels of service to control congestion that may result as new development occurs.

The City of Fowler’s General Plan, adopted April 18, 2023, encourages a LOS ‘C’ throughout the local circulation network according to Policy MOB-5. In addition, Policy MOB-5 indicates that LOS ‘D’ may be allowed during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at SR 99 interchanges, and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible. LOS ‘D’ may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity. LOS ‘E’ may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized. For purposes of this analysis, LOS ‘D’ was applied to intersections of major streets (American Avenue, Golden State Boulevard, Clovis Avenue, SR 99 Ramps) in the study area while LOS ‘C’ was applied to all other intersecting streets/roadways.

Fresno County’s 2000 General Plan, policy number TR-A.2, identifies a minimum LOS standard of ‘D’ on urban roadways within the spheres of influence of the cities of Fresno and Clovis and identifies a minimum LOS standard of ‘C’ on all other roadways in the county.

Based on guidance from Caltrans, the LOS for operating State highway facilities is based on Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) identified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS “C” and LOS “D” on State highway facilities; however, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS.

If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than this target LOS, the existing MOE should be maintained. In general, the region-wide goal for an acceptable LOS on all freeways, roadways segments, and intersections is “D”. For undeveloped or not densely developed locations, the goal may be to achieve LOS “C”.
mwm.
397
Section , Item D
1-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Regional Location
Figure
1-1
Manteca Yosemite National Park
Modesto 1
Turlock
395
■ •• ®
SierraNational Forest
'395
Dinuba Inyo National Forest
Hanford Visalia '395 Tulare
•101 Porterville
Coalinga
Sequoia National Forest 101
395* Delano
SL Ridgecrest o .

Obispo
A “
National Monument Santa Mana •395]
, I Lancaster
y Palmdale V
Lompoc
LEGEND
Project Location
i/rpa TECHNOIOGIES INC.
ircmwewn i*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Regional Location
Figure
1-1
Manteca Yosemite National Park
Modesto 1
Turlock
395
■ •• ®
SierraNational Forest
'395
Dinuba Inyo National Forest
Hanford Visalia '395 Tulare
•101 Porterville
Coalinga
Sequoia National Forest 101
395* Delano
SL Ridgecrest o .

Obispo
A “
National Monument Santa Mana •395]
, I Lancaster
y Palmdale V
Lompoc
LEGEND
Project Location
i/rpa TECHNOIOGIES INC.
ircmwewn i*c
398
Section , Item D
1-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Location
Figure
1-2
American Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Fowler Ave
North
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Aye
Minnewawa Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
------- Study Roadway Segment
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
VrPA TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Location
Figure
1-2
American Ave
Sunnyside Ave
Fowler Ave
North
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Aye
Minnewawa Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
------- Study Roadway Segment
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
VrPA TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
399
Section , Item D
1-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project Site Plan
Figure
1-3
j4O-T00-*W

SAHA FARMWLLC
EXISDNG 60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF HAY AVENUE
0OGHOSANPHILIPTW E EXCEPTION #12 - 20' IRRIGADON RIGHT OF IMr-i EXCEPTION #8 - 20' PUBUC RIGHT OF HW-1 PROPOSED 20' RIGHT OF IVAV DEDICATION-] North EXISTING COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY- -EXISTING 40' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY CTR 1/4 COR. SEC 9 15/21-, EAST EXISTING STAND PIPE- CLAYTON — ;if ", 657.51' 20.00' ............... 1305.03H- 99.00" ] cP. | 207.48’ 85.00'
'3>. 105.00' 105.00’ 100.10’ 119.00’ 119.00' 101.78' 2 §

0.46 2 ACRES
3 o

0.48 § ACRES 5
■ > 38 -o § 0.41 §
2 ACRES 2 4 §

0.48 S
ACRES "
10 g

0.49 o ACRES ~
6 8

0.49 g
ACRES
7 8

0.49 8
ACRES "
8 8

0.49 g
ACRES ~
9 0.49 ACRES
5 8 s

0.47 $ ACRES

85.00/b
LROAD
LIGHT, POLE 1.07 ACRES
L=53.62
L=57.96
-L=29.74

26.69'
I | 105.00' 105.00' 1 19.00' 119,00' | 119.00' 121.78' 12 CULVERT AND WALL ABANDONED 'WaILRWLll- EASL. 8 37 8 8 0.42 8
~ ACRES "
140.09' U 100.10 99.00’ IW

85.00'
'EP
119.00’ 119.00’ 119.00' 44

0.86 ACRES
121.78’ 14 8

0.55 g
ACRES
15 0.55 130.55 ACRES
12 0.55 ACRES
11 0.54 ACRES g
8 8 36 8
8 0-42 g
ACRES
ACRES S 8

73.63' 105.00' 119.00’ 1 19.00' 119.00’ 119.00' 388.63’ 60'
121.78' 40
35 g
8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 16 8

0.55 8
ACRES
18 8

0.55 g
ACRES
17 8

0.55 ACRES
20 0.54 ACRES
19 0.55 ACRES
ACRES g
257.24' 21.69’ --------- L=29.74 99.00' 121.78’ 119.00' 119.00' 119.00’ 8 34 g 8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 39

0.87 ACRES

51.79‘\ L=29.74
138.00' 138.00' 120.00' 100.00’ 22

0.44 ACRES
21 0.44 ACRES
EXCEPTION L=64.88 #5 & #7 - 100' RIGHT OF WAY FOR- RAILROAD PURPOSES 121.78' 25 8

0.58 ACRES
24 0.58 ACRES
23 0.58 ACRES s g
£ 8 33 8
8 0.42 g
ACRES "
SECDON LINE — k

PARCEL LINE
120.00' 120.00' 139.83' 138.00' 138.00' 229.83' 186.00' 27

0.43 g
ACRES g
L=33.04- L=29.74

61.69' |
28 0.44 ACRES
121.78' EXCEPTION f9 - 15' DITCH EASEMENT 26 $

0.67 ACRES
L=78.54
136.00'
■d b 32
§ n 8
0-56 § ACRES g
100.00'
L=71.34 OUTLOT A

1.44 ACRES

64.52' | L=29.74 121.78' L= 40.24 29 s

0.60 § ACRES
30 ■o 31

0.56 ACRES
I K

0.52 S
ACRES 2

54.45' 130.00' 116.52'
InnageSource: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. \/rpa TCCHHOUmiEt INC WEST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 10 15/21- FOUND 1" IRON PIPE, L.S. 2484, DOWN 0.8’ PER RECORD OF SURVEY BK. 43, PG. 78 EXISTING MAILBOXES (3h &
-EXISTING STAND PIPE PROPANE TANKi. 65.4’ r&
-EXISTING HOUSE
APPROX. LOCATION OF SANITARY SEWER SEPTIC TANK'' 18.82' —EXISTING BARN

18.15' I 105.00’ 105.00' 1 H-26.69’ 1 =29.74 EXISTING STAND 43 8 42 8

0.48 g 0.48 g

M ACRES ACRES
105.00’ 105.00'
--EXISTING WATER TANK

GAS TANK- POWER POLE W/ELECTRICAL METER
ELECTRIC PANEL8' DIRT ROAD

EXISTING WATER FILTER- & WATER LINE

REMAINDER

0.46 2 ACRES
3 o

0.48 § ACRES 5
■ > 38 -o § 0.41 §
2 ACRES 2 4 §

0.48 S
ACRES "
10 g

0.49 o ACRES ~
6 8

0.49 g
ACRES
7 8

0.49 8
ACRES "
8 8

0.49 g
ACRES ~
9 0.49 ACRES
5 8 s

0.47 $ ACRES

85.00/b
LROAD
LIGHT, POLE 1.07 ACRES
L=53.62
L=57.96
-L=29.74

26.69'
I | 105.00' 105.00' 1 19.00' 119,00' | 119.00' 121.78' 12 CULVERT AND WALL ABANDONED 'WaILRWLll- EASL. 8 37 8 8 0.42 8
~ ACRES "
140.09' U 100.10 99.00’ IW

85.00'
'EP
119.00’ 119.00’ 119.00' 44

0.86 ACRES
121.78’ 14 8

0.55 g
ACRES
15 0.55 130.55 ACRES
12 0.55 ACRES
11 0.54 ACRES g
8 8 36 8
8 0-42 g
ACRES
ACRES S 8

73.63' 105.00' 119.00’ 1 19.00' 119.00’ 119.00' 388.63’ 60'
121.78' 40
35 g
8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 16 8

0.55 8
ACRES
18 8

0.55 g
ACRES
17 8

0.55 ACRES
20 0.54 ACRES
19 0.55 ACRES
ACRES g
257.24' 21.69’ --------- L=29.74 99.00' 121.78’ 119.00' 119.00' 119.00’ 8 34 g 8 0.42 g
- ACRES - 39

0.87 ACRES

51.79‘\ L=29.74
138.00' 138.00' 120.00' 100.00’ 22

0.44 ACRES
21 0.44 ACRES
EXCEPTION L=64.88 #5 & #7 - 100' RIGHT OF WAY FOR- RAILROAD PURPOSES 121.78' 25 8

0.58 ACRES
24 0.58 ACRES
23 0.58 ACRES s g
£ 8 33 8
8 0.42 g
ACRES "
SECDON LINE — k

PARCEL LINE
120.00' 120.00' 139.83' 138.00' 138.00' 229.83' 186.00' 27

0.43 g
ACRES g
L=33.04- L=29.74

61.69' |
28 0.44 ACRES
121.78' EXCEPTION f9 - 15' DITCH EASEMENT 26 $

0.67 ACRES
L=78.54
136.00'
■d b 32
§ n 8
0-56 § ACRES g
100.00'
L=71.34 OUTLOT A

1.44 ACRES

64.52' | L=29.74 121.78' L= 40.24 29 s

0.60 § ACRES
30 ■o 31

0.56 ACRES
I K

0.52 S
ACRES 2

18.15' I 105.00’ 105.00' 1 H-26.69’ 1 =29.74 EXISTING STAND 43 8 42 8

0.48 g 0.48 g

M ACRES ACRES
105.00’ 105.00'
--EXISTING WATER TANK

GAS TANK- POWER POLE W/ELECTRICAL METER
ELECTRIC PANEL8' DIRT ROAD

EXISTING WATER FILTER- & WATER LINE

REMAINDER

14.39 ACRES
PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL
1287.51'
5 i
34O- T20-0&
ftAZWWIPAULETTE
fowleravenue
10‘ DIRT ROAD
WATER CONNECTION- 150.00' 477,08'
-01 960.48'
EXISTING 6' BLOCK WALL'
\RPA
400
Section , Item D
1-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-1
Signalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions
(Highway Capacity Manual)
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (sec/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION Describes operations with very low delay. This level of service occurs whentherels no conflict!ng trafficfora minorstreet. A <10,0 Describes operations with moderately low delay. This level generally occurs with a small amount of conflicting traffic causing higher levels of averagedelay.
>10.0-20.0
Describes operations with average delays. Thesehigher delays may result from a moderate amount of minor street traffic. Queues begin to get longer.
>20.0-35.0
Describes a crowded operation, with below average delays. Atlevel D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from shorter gaps on the mainline and an increase of minor street D >35.0-55.0 Describes operations at or near capacity, This level is considered by many E agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values >55.0-80.0 Describes operations that are at the failure point. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over- saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceedthe capacity of the intersection. Insufficient gaps of suitable size exist to allow minor traffic to cross the intersection safely.

F >80.0
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (sec/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION Describes operations with very low delay. This level of service occurs whentherels no conflict!ng trafficfora minorstreet. A <10,0 Describes operations with moderately low delay. This level generally occurs with a small amount of conflicting traffic causing higher levels of averagedelay.
>10.0-20.0
Describes operations with average delays. Thesehigher delays may result from a moderate amount of minor street traffic. Queues begin to get longer.
>20.0-35.0
Describes a crowded operation, with below average delays. Atlevel D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from shorter gaps on the mainline and an increase of minor street D >35.0-55.0 Describes operations at or near capacity, This level is considered by many E agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values >55.0-80.0 Describes operations that are at the failure point. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over- saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceedthe capacity of the intersection. Insufficient gaps of suitable size exist to allow minor traffic to cross the intersection safely.

F >80.0
401
Section , Item D
1-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-2
Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions (Highway Capacity Manual)
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (seq/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION A No delay for stop-controlled approaches. 0 - 10.0
B Describes operations with minor delay,
©j
©
>10.0-15.0
C Describes operations with moderate delays.
©j
>15.0-25.0
D Describes operations with some delays.
©I
©
>25.0-35.0
E Describes operations with high delays and long queues. ©j
©
>35.0-50.0
F Describes operations with extreme congestion, with very high delays and long queuesunacceptable to most drivers.
©J
o
>50.0
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (seq/veh) LEVELOF SERVICE DEFINITION A No delay for stop-controlled approaches. 0 - 10.0
B Describes operations with minor delay,
©j
©
>10.0-15.0
C Describes operations with moderate delays.
©j
>15.0-25.0
D Describes operations with some delays.
©I
©
>25.0-35.0
E Describes operations with high delays and long queues. ©j
©
>35.0-50.0
F Describes operations with extreme congestion, with very high delays and long queuesunacceptable to most drivers.
©J
o
>50.0
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
402
Section , Item D
1-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-3
Roadway Segment
Level of Service Definitions
(Highway Capacity Manual)

LEVEL OF SERVICE l DEFINITION
A
st Represents free flow. Individual vehicles are virtually unaffected by the presenceof others in the traffic stream.

B
Is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other vehicles in the = ta __ traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedomto select desired speedsis _ ' relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to ' fcs ’ H maneuver. *
=
'
C
-UK OL
Is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of therange of flow in which the operation of individual vehicles becomes significantly affected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream, r D
Ha Is a crowded segment of roadway with a large number of vehicles restricting mobility and a stableflow. Speedand freedom to maneuver are „ r - : severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience.
a
E
r- 1
Representsoperating conditions at or near the level capacity. Alt speeds w , are reducedto a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow M will causebreakdowns in traffic movement.
*
Is used to define forced or breakdown flow (stop-and-go gridlock). This m condition exists when the amount of traffic approaches a point where the amount of traffic exceeds the amount that can travel to a destination. __i -7 r Operations within the queues are characterized by stop and go waves,and jgr they are extremely unstable. z? W
LEVEL OF SERVICE l DEFINITION
A
st Represents free flow. Individual vehicles are virtually unaffected by the presenceof others in the traffic stream.

B
Is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other vehicles in the = ta __ traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedomto select desired speedsis _ ' relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to ' fcs ’ H maneuver. *
=
'
C
-UK OL
Is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of therange of flow in which the operation of individual vehicles becomes significantly affected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream, r D
Ha Is a crowded segment of roadway with a large number of vehicles restricting mobility and a stableflow. Speedand freedom to maneuver are „ r - : severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience.
a
E
r- 1
Representsoperating conditions at or near the level capacity. Alt speeds w , are reducedto a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow M will causebreakdowns in traffic movement.
*
Is used to define forced or breakdown flow (stop-and-go gridlock). This m condition exists when the amount of traffic approaches a point where the amount of traffic exceeds the amount that can travel to a destination. __i -7 r Operations within the queues are characterized by stop and go waves,and jgr they are extremely unstable. z? W
403
Section , Item D
1-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Introduction
Table 1-4
Peak Hour Two-Way Segment Volume Thresholds

Lanes Median A B C D E
2 Divided N/A N/A 440 1,640 1,860
4 Divided N/A N/A 1,000 3,470 3,730
2 TWTL N/A N/A 420 1,550 1,760
4 TWTL N/A N/A 940 3,290 3,550
2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 1,480
4 Undivided N/A N/A 770 2,740 2,980
2 TWTL N/A N/A 420 1,550 1,760
4 TWTL N/A N/A 940 3,290 3,550
2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 1,480
4 Undivided N/A N/A 770 2,740 2,980
2 Undivided N/A N/A 700 930 1,000
2 Divided N/A N/A 700 930 1,000
Level of Service

COLLECTORS
N/A- LOS is not achievable because of the type of facility LOCAL

ARTERIAL
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
404
Section , Item D
2-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.0 Existing Conditions

2.1 Existing Traffic Counts and Roadway Geometrics
The first step toward assessing Project traffic impacts is to assess existing traffic conditions.

Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements were collected at each study intersection by National Data and Surveying Services. Intersection turning movement counts were conducted for the peak hour periods of 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM for study intersections on either Tuesday, November 14, 2023, or Thursday, February 22, 2024. Traffic count data worksheets are provided in Appendix B. The day on which counts were taken is representative of typical traffic volumes within the study area. Schools were in session and the weather was mild.

2.2 Existing Functional Roadway Classification System
Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the type of service they are intended to provide. Fundamental to this process is the recognition that individual streets and highways do not serve travel independently in any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads.

The current hierarchical system of roadways consists of the following six (6) basic classifications:
 Freeways – Limited-access facilities designed for high-speed regional mobility. Freeways may include up to eight lanes (four lanes in each direction). SR 99, in the Project study area, is classified as a freeway.
 Expressways –High-speed, two- to six-lane divided roadways, primarily servicing through and cross-town traffic, with no direct access to abutting property and at-grade intersections located at approximately half-mile intervals. Golden State Boulevard is classified as an Expressway in the study area per the City of Fowler General Plan Circulation Diagram.  Arterial – Typically four- to six-lane divided roadways, with somewhat limited access to abutting properties, and with the primary purpose of moving traffic within and between community plan areas and to and from freeways and expressways. The portions of American Avenue and Clovis Avenue within the City of Fowler Planning Area are classified as Arterials.  Collectors – Two to four-lane undivided roadways, with the primary function of connecting local streets and arterials and neighborhood traffic generators and providing access to abutting properties. Lincoln Avenue, Fowler Avenue, Clayton Avenue, and Merced Street are classified as a Collector in the study area per the City of Fowler General Plan.

 Local Streets – Two- to three-lane public or private roadways designed to provide direct access to properties while discouraging traffic between major streets. They are intended to carry low volumes of traffic and support unrestricted on-street parking.

VlWM rrowowMnme
405
Section , Item D
2-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.3 Affected Streets and Highways
Street and highway intersections and segments near and adjacent to the Project site were analyzed to determine levels of service utilizing HCM-based methodologies described previously.

The study intersections and street and highway segments included in this TIS are listed below.

Intersections

1. American Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

2. American Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

3. Jefferson Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

6. Fowler Avenue and Lincoln Avenue

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard

8. Clayton Avenue and Fowler Avenue

9. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 NB Ramps

10. Clayton Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

11. Clovis Avenue and SR 99 SB Ramps

12. Adams Avenue and SR 99 SB Off Ramp

13. Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp

14. Merced Street and Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp

15. Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps
Roadway Segments
 Fowler Avenue between:
 Adam Avenue and Clayton Avenue
 Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
 Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
 Clayton Avenue between:
 Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue
 Lincoln Avenue between:
 Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
 Jefferson Avenue between:
 Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
The existing lane geometry at study area intersections is shown in Figure 2-1. All the study intersections are currently unsignalized except for two intersections (American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp) which do not have any intersection controls. Figures 2-2 and 2-3 show existing traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours in the study area.

VlWM rrowowMnme
406
Section , Item D
2-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing LaneGeometry
Jefferson Ave
Lincoln Ave

8. Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenrarr Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp •1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave 15 Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps v4?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave ijJi 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd RoI
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Clovis Ave Frontage

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
*ittr
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment
JU
4*
HIL
Private Dwv •
407
Section , Item D
2-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing AM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-2
Lincoln Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Aye F
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp "T to CO — 279
75 82
124
122
46 175
102
226 119
v4?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave o o cxi cn
IIL
t ___26 I 16
©
*111- o co m
in
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
-

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps <-A------- 19 « ---------702 x ~416
nr coco
r- CO
f — 29
CM
04 O'
JI
* ------- 42 •
37 ---i
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
t- -r- in
rr ID
v- in
25 t
17 ---------
58 1
ittr 04 o>
co
04 LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment ' letterson AV" and Golden Sialo Blvd CMO)
’T- m> JU
20 ___J nil
o co
r- coCM
•1 Joftenion Avn and Clovts AVe
r- OJTJ hL
Private Dwv
4~° ©
H
nil-CO r- cnin
ttcwotwcnu«
408
Section , Item D
2-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing PM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-3
Incoln Av<
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Frcmlaoe
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 2
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp T co <o r- 171
63 139
65 63 ■65
nlirCM O

O V- CN
116
203
247 65
24 170
336
■1 Jotfer on Ave and ClovtS Ave
0 0
$
Private Dwy
\/rpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave CM03
r- co
to
IIL co co nlF* O N LO
LO
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r- tn CXio
co 41 ' x 573
nil X' to tO 03
• r u
’T <D — CD
Ji
< -------33 •
62— I
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
r Lane Geometry
Study Roadway Segment
125 ------->
*r co m- CM
' lefferson /W" and Golden Sialo Blvd
to 0) co
J II
40 J
31 I nil O
CXI
ttcwotwcnu«
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing PM PeakHour Traffic
Figure
2-3
Incoln Av<
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Frcmlaoe
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 2
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp T co <o r- 171
63 139
65 63 ■65
nlirCM O

2.4 Level of Service

2.4.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis
All intersection LOS analyses were estimated using Synchro 12 Software. Various roadway geometrics, traffic volumes, and properties (peak hour factors, storage pocket length, etc) were input into the Synchro 12 Software program to accurately determine the travel delay and LOS for each study scenario. The intersection LOS and delays reported represent the HCM 6th Edition outputs. Synchro assumptions, listed below, show the various Synchro inputs and methodologies used in the analysis.
 Lane Geometry
 Storage lengths for turn lanes for existing intersections were obtained from aerial photos and rounded to the nearest 25 feet
 VRPA conducted a field study of the specified intersections and segments to verify lane geometry and intersection control as well as to obtain other pertinent data.  Traffic Conditions
 Peak hour factors (PHF) for each intersection approach were obtained from the traffic counts discussed in Section 2.1 and were utilized for Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. For all future scenarios, a PHF of 0.92 was applied unless the existing PHF was greater than 0.92. The value of 0.92 was used because it is the default value recommended in the HCM.
 Heavy vehicle percentages were based on the field traffic counts.  Roadway link speed limits were observed in the field and input into the Synchro network to determine roadway link speeds
 Two of the study intersections function without a traffic control which prevents Synchro from generating a delay since synchro does not support intersections without a traffic control. As a result, a ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes was input into the Synchro model at American Avenue at SR 99 NB On Ramp and Adams Avenue and SR 99 NB On Ramp.

Results of the analysis show that a majority of the study intersections currently operate at or better than the City of Fowler LOS criteria. Clovis Avenue at SR 99 SB On Ramp is currently operating at LOS F. Table 2-1 shows the intersection LOS for the existing conditions. Synchro 11 (HCM 6th Edition) Worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

2.4.2 Queuing Analysis
Table 2-2 provides a queue length summary for left and right turn lane approaches at study intersections. As shown in Table 2-2, existing traffic at the westbound left approach for the Merced Street and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Avenue intersection exceeds the existing 50-foot storage pocket.

VlWM rrowowMnme
410
Section , Item D
2-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions

2.4.3 Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Results of the AM and PM peak hour LOS segment analysis along the existing street and highway system are reflected in Table 2-3. The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the road and highway system for this study were estimated using Table 5.14-2 from the City of Fresno General Plan and Development Code Update Master Environmental Impact Report included in Appendix A. Results of the analysis show that all of the study roadway segments meet the City of Fowler’s minimum acceptable level of service criteria during both the AM and PM peak hour.

2.5 Study Area Collision Analysis
The Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) provided by University of California, Berkeley was used to evaluate traffic collisions in the study area. TIMS utilizes geocoded data provided by the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). SWITRS is a tool used by California Highway Patrol (CHP) and other Allied Agencies throughout California and includes various types of statistical reports and data. The database serves as a means to collect and process data gathered from a collision scene. Information from the TIMS database shows that approximately 176 injury accidents and 9 fatal accidents have occurred throughout the study area during the 5- year period between January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2022. A graphical representation of traffic collisions throughout the study area for the 5-year period reflected above is provided in Figure 2-4. More detailed collision data is provided in Appendix D. The Fresno County region had approximately 15,033 injury accidents and 737 fatal accidents over the same timeframe referenced above. Injury and fatal accidents in the study area represent 1.2% of incidents that occurred in the Fresno County Region. Rear-End collisions represent 45% of the accidents in the study area while broadside collisions represent 23%. Unsafe Speed ranked as the highest primary crash factor at 44% of accidents in the study area. Automobile right-of-way was the second highest primary crash factor at 16%.

VlWM rrowowMnme
411
Section , Item D
2-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-1
Existing Intersection Operations

DELAY LOS
AM 11.7 B
PM 12.0 B
AM 7.8 A
PM 7.7 A
AM 12.4 B
PM 13.7 B
AM 26.7 D
PM 27.2 D
AM 16.3 C
PM 24.1 C
AM 10.2 B
PM 10.1 B
AM 12.1 B
PM 15.3 C
AM 9.0 A
PM 9.2 A
AM 19.0 C
PM 16.6 C
AM 9.1 A
PM 10.7 B
AM >50.0 F
PM >50.0 F
AM 9.6 A
PM 10.3 B
AM 0.0 A
PM 0.0 A
AM 20.9 C
PM 15.2 C
AM 21.0 C
PM 17.5 C
DELAY is measured in seconds
LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded Merced St a nd SR 99 NB Ra mps
D
D
D
All Way Stop
One Way Stop
Merced St a nd SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
15 10
11 12
13 14
Adams Ave SR 99 NB On Ra mps No Control (1) D
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 D
Two Way Stop C
Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Two-way Stop D
One Way Stop
One Way Stop
Cla yton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
D
Clovis Ave and Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave One Way Stop D
Golden State Blvd a nd Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Lincoln Ave

CONTROL TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING
(1) Synchro does n’t generate a delay for inters ections without a traffic control. A ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes wa s input into the Synchro model.

Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps One Way Stop D

INTERSECTION
For all-way s top controlled intersections , delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For two-way and one-way s top controlled intersections , delay results show the delay for the wors t movement.

Golden State Blvd a nd Clayton Ave Two Way Stop D
Fowler Ave and Cl ayton Ave One Way Stop C
American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp No Control (1) D
American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
VlWM rrowowMni«c
412
Section , Item D
2-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-2
Existing Queuing Operations
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
SB Right 225 18 3
NB Left 150 3 0
SB Right 150 0 0
NB Left 150 0 0
SB Left 150 0 0
NB Left 75 0 0
SB Left 150 3 5
SB Right 125 0 0
NB Left 150 13 5
WB Left 50 10 5
SB Right 50 0 0
NB Left 50 0 0
SB Left 125 63 48
EB Left 75 83 203
EB Right 150 5 23
NB Right 100 13 28
WB Left 50 80 60
EB Left 50 15 15
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes exceedance

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)

EXISTING
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave
5 9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
VlWM rrowowMni«c
413
Section , Item D
2-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Table 2-3
Existing Segment Operations
VOLUME LOS AM 125 C
PM 124 C AM 175 C
PM 144 C AM 93 C
PM 129 C AM 10 C
PM 11 C AM 88 C
PM 101 C AM 8 C
PM 3 C
LOS = Level of Se rvi ce / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded C
C
C
C
C
2 Lanes Divided C
2 Lanes Divided
2 Lanes Undivided
Jefferson Avenue
Lincon Avenue
Clayton Avenue
Adams Avenue and Clayton Avenue
Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
2 Lanes Divided
2 Lanes Undivided
Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue
Collector
Collector
Local
Local
Collector
Local
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue
Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
2 Lanes Divided
Fowler Avenue

STREET SEGMENT

SEGMENT

DESCRIPTION

TARGET LOS PEAK HOUR

EXISTING ROADWAY

FUNCTIONAL

CLASSIFICATION
VlWM rrowowMni«c
414
Section , Item D
2-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Existing Conditions
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Study Area Collision Map (01/01/2018 - 12/31/2022)
Figure
2-4
1 Broadside
Accidents
North
Armstrong Ave
Fowler Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Ave
LEGEND
til
ro
ro
£o
c=
§
Head-On
Sideswipe
Rear End
Adams Ave Broadside
Hit Object
Vehicle/Pedestrian 0) <
£CD
C
c
0)
txt
Overturned
S
o
o
Other
Sumner Ave I
>
1 3
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Study Area Collision Map (01/01/2018 - 12/31/2022)
Figure
2-4
1 Broadside
Accidents
North
Armstrong Ave
Fowler Ave
Jefferson Ave
Peach Ave
Lincoln Ave
Clayton Ave
LEGEND
til
ro
ro
£o
c=
§
Head-On
Sideswipe
Rear End
Adams Ave Broadside
Hit Object
Vehicle/Pedestrian 0) <
£CD
C
c
0)
txt
Overturned
S
o
o
Other
Sumner Ave I
>
1 3
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.
415
Section , Item D
3-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.0 Traffic Impacts
This chapter provides an assessment of traffic and the impact on the surrounding street system.

3.1 Trip Generation
The Annexation/Prezone proposes a prezone to M-1 and R-1-7. The Project also proposes a 44- lot industrial subdivision on 45.04 acres of land. The trip generation was based on the highest level of trip generation of all feasible uses at the Project site as determined in discussions with City of Fowler staff. The result of these discussions were the assumption of use of the General Light Industrial trip generation category with a floor area ration of 0.20, resulting in 392,000 sq. ft. of development. There is an area shown on the project site that indicates a proposal for residential use, but this is not considered to be part of the project for trip generation purposes.

The considerations described above led to the recommended trip generation for weekday AM (7:00-9:00am) and PM (4:00-6:00pm) peak hours shown in Table 3-1. Any exceedance of the values shown in Table 3-1 would require consideration of a revised traffic study.

Table 3-1
Project Trip Generation

3.2 Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution percentages for the Existing Plus Project and Horizon Year scenarios is shown in Figure 3-1. These percentages are based upon knowledge of the study area, engineering judgement, prevailing traffic patterns in the study area, major routes, population centers, and other existing developments.

Site access will be provided at two Project Driveways along Clayton Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue. At the south end of the Project, Lynn Avenue dead ends at the south property line. Regional access to the site is provided via SR 99.

DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT)
IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL General Light Industrial
(Auto Trips) 110 392 ksf 3.638 1,426 0.730 88:12 253 33 286 0.640 14:86 34 217 251 General Light Industrial
(Truck Trips) 110 392 ksf 0.250 98 0.010 50:50 2 2 4 0.010 50:50 2 2 4 1,524 255 35 290 36 219 255
1,720 259 39 298 40 223 263
Source: Generation factors from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.

PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent
ITE Land Use Code

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION (PCE)
LAND USE Size WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME RATE IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME RATE IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 416
Section , Item D
3-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Trip Distribution
Figure
3-1
American Ave
0) <■O
to
>1
c
15%
<
o
cn
co
§
E
<
5% 5%
V)
Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave Peach Ave
5% 5%
Lincoln Ave
5%
5%
Clayton Ave
<u
<
roS
ro
5 a>
5%
5% 5% Adams Ave
North
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
Trip Distribution %
------- Study RoadwaySegment
Sumner Ave 15%
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
V'frP4 OOPWtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Trip Distribution
Figure
3-1
American Ave
0) <■O
to
>1
c
15%
<
o
cn
co
§
E
<
5% 5%
V)
Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave Peach Ave
5% 5%
Lincoln Ave
5%
5%
Clayton Ave
<u
<
roS
ro
5 a>
5%
5% 5% Adams Ave
North
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------- Existing Roadway
Trip Distribution %
------- Study RoadwaySegment
Sumner Ave 15%
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

Kenneth Ave
Clovis Ave
Willow Ave
Villa Ave
V'frP4 OOPWtMM 417
Section , Item D
3-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.3 Project Traffic
Project traffic as shown in Table 3-1 was distributed to the roadway system using the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 3-1. The graphical representation of the resulting AM and PM peak hour Project trips used is shown in Figures 3-2 and 3-3.

3.4 Existing Plus Project Conditions
An Existing Plus Project Scenario was analyzed to include existing traffic plus traffic generated by the Project. The peak hour trips for the Project were added to existing traffic volumes to analyze the impacts. The resulting traffic is shown in Figures 3-4 and 3-5.

3.5 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions
The impacts of the Project were analyzed considering future traffic conditions, approximately twenty (20) years in the future or the year 2044. The levels of traffic expected in the horizon year relate to the cumulative effect of traffic increases resulting from the implementation of the General Plans of local agencies, including the City of Fowler. Traffic conditions without the Project in the Horizon Year were estimated based upon the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) regional travel model. In cases where the model showed less than 2% growth per year, traffic conditions without the Project in the Horizon Year were estimated based upon a 2% per year growth factor. Traffic conditions resulting from this scenario are shown in Figures 3-6 and 3-7.

3.6 Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions
The addition of Project trips, which were distributed to the roadway system using the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 3-1 (Section 3.3), were added to Horizon Year Without Project traffic volumes. Traffic conditions resulting from this scenario are shown in Figures 3-8 and 3-9.

3.7 Impacts

3.7.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 3-2 provides the intersection level of service analysis for the study intersections considering the study scenarios discussed above. Potential roadway improvement measures are discussed in Chapter 4 of this report. Results of the analysis show that the Project will contribute to an unacceptable LOS at eight (8) of the study intersections when comparing the Horizon Year scenarios.
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 418
Section , Item D
3-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts

3.7.2 Queuing Analysis
Table 3-3 provides a queue length summary for left and right turn lane approaches at study intersections. The queue lengths presented in Table 3-3 represent the 95 percentile queue lengths for the respective lane movements based on the Synchro traffic signal timing program.

Results of the queuing analysis shows that existing queue storage will be adequate to serve expected peak hour queue lengths at most of the intersections. However, storage will be insufficient at two (2) of the study intersection considering the Horizon Year scenario.

3.7.3 Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Results of the AM and PM peak hour LOS segment analysis along the existing street and highway system are reflected in Table 3-4. Results of the analysis show that all of the study roadway segments meet the City of Fowler’s minimum acceptable level of service criteria during both the AM and PM peak hour.
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 419
Section , Item D
3-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-2
J American Ave
Z£
1 I
I
|I
i I
I
I
I
1 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave arid SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 6 0
?
[stop] 0
39 ,'fl 0
0 ■1Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave
0 , <o 0
0 <d
0□
Private Owy
o 0 o
0 0
0 - o e>
c
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ono t 0 *7----- 0
j 0
0 t 0 —
0 | O CXI o
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps I 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ 52 LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 3 lefferson AVf and Golden Sialo Blvd O CD
CO
Jll
O to
»•
H
0?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
VfrP4 rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-2
J American Ave
Z£
1 I
I
|I
i I
I
I
I
1 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave arid SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 6 0
?
[stop] 0
39 ,'fl 0
0 ■1Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave
0 , <o 0
0 <d
0□
Private Owy
o 0 o
0 0
0 - o e>
c
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ono t 0 *7----- 0
j 0
0 t 0 —
0 | O CXI o
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps I 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ 52 LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 3 lefferson AVf and Golden Sialo Blvd O CD
CO
Jll
O to
»•
H
0?P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
VfrP4 rwtwtMM t*c 420
Section , Item D
3-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-3
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd 0 0
0 0
0 0
■
1 American Ave end SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 33 0 O O ID < LEGEND
Study Intersection
12 0
0 Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
Study RoadwaySegment
u 0 ol/»P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 i
CMO
11 J1

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r-~ CO mrr
41 8 • . 0 ------ 12 ____*
o
MolsB
1 letferson AV"
■
and Goklen Slain Blvd

O CMO HIL
Private Dwy
-H
•
H O T~ O
V rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Project PM Peak Hour Traffic 3-3
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd 0 0
0 0
0 0
■
1 American Ave end SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 Amenran Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 33 0 O O ID < LEGEND
Study Intersection
12 0
0 Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
Study RoadwaySegment
u 0 ol/»P4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
4 i
CMO
11 J1

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
r-~ CO mrr
41 8 • . 0 ------ 12 ____*
o
MolsB
1 letferson AV"
■
and Goklen Slain Blvd

O CMO HIL
Private Dwy
-H
•
H O T~ O
V rwtwtMM t*c 421
Section , Item D
3-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Clayton Avo A
i
5 1
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Avs 6. Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd COo
to co
ilL
t ___26
L 16 0
w- O CD
CO 9
------32
t ___ 2 ••------- 150
<-j— 18
f 29 •H
•
o ooin
in © 0 f 26 ■/ »
1/ ; EMn o
v COco
0 t 1 ------(a
o i •II* O CD CO
cp in CM A
North
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps «— '■--------- 31 « ------------- 710
A.4G8
111
co r -
*“ CM
• r — 29 10 r-•fl124
102
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave

T- T-(O
rr m in
• 103 t 17 — 5*
58 1 *itbo~ CMCD
CO
CM
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 279
75 74
132
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
© Stop Sign
Lane Geometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
241
Private Dwy
Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

V'frP4 rwtwtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone Figure
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Clayton Avo A
i
5 1
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Avs 6. Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd COo
to co
ilL
t ___26
L 16 0
w- O CD
CO 9
------32
t ___ 2 ••------- 150
<-j— 18
f 29 •H
•
o ooin
in © 0 f 26 ■/ »
1/ ; EMn o
v COco
0 t 1 ------(a
o i •II* O CD CO
cp in CM A
North
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps «— '■--------- 31 « ------------- 710
A.4G8
111
co r -
*“ CM
• r — 29 10 r-•fl124
102
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave

V'frP4 rwtwtMM 422
Section , Item D
3-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-5

5. Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave T Co
r- CO to
UL co co
o co1-0 (Ocxj
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd t_ o T~~ 39130
f 157 T~i
• e
0 f 3 ------V* 0 i 4b
s ”
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ Clovis Ave Frontage
co■>-
4 i <Dbp
099 ---------•
f 6 ------
581
in <DOCM ® r'“
t ___ 14
« ------208
33 •
H
62 ----1
11 SR 99 SB R amps and Clovis Ave 12 AdamsAve and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp »- CO CM
CO r- r- * ------ 74
t 171
63 77 t 24 ___
2 * 170 | 2------1
201 ~~~T
10 J/
127 ------* nrcor-<N
349 ------* 209
1 American Ave -and SR 99 SB Oft Ramp ----- 34
I--- 79
•
« ------65
247 ------»
1 letterscin 7W>and Golden stale Blvd
IOuo<n
co •Ml
40 J
31 I
nil
O’ K
V- CO
CXJ
LEGEND
Project Site
© Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment <1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis AV? o io cm
MIL
Private Dwy
w O O
0 H
nlPCOb- O Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC.

V'frP4 rwtwtMM
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-5

V'frP4 rwtwtMM 423
Section , Item D
3-9 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-6
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
o tn <-■
5 IIL
t ____ 39 I M
•
1th
o cm to CM
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave
48 12 Jefferson Ave
0 39
25 CO(D CD
Iincoln Ave T CO

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 107
181
nib <jp tn ro
v152 37
25 336
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave ------- 28
* ---------- 1043
•618
175 ------ 207 ___* — 43
68 f 260
_* ____122
184
4 Jefferson Ave and Clovis AV?
4K
Private Dwv
o o tn
•
H
COTLEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
*;s LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
26 « ____ 746
nil co ’M- COCO
co
t©
43 — ! 36 |
nrwwtMM t*c 424
Section , Item D
3-10 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-7
J American Ave <
s
I
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
254
94 207
97 94
niF* COO> D O 6i t- 172
302
367 97
36 253
499 186
15 Merced Street end SR 99 NB Ramps
o t- co hil
1 0
0 Private Owy
0 0
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 850* ------ 58
r NJ NJ
*ltb
ctnsCXIco
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 851
36 Adams Ave
I
I
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 1 iatterspn 7\V" and Golden Slain Blvd 111 o co CMO) 61 i
l/RP4 TECHNOIOGIEI. INC
V'frP4 rwtwtMM t*c
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-7
J American Ave <
s
I
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
254
94 207
97 94
niF* COO> D O 6i t- 172
302
367 97
36 253
499 186
15 Merced Street end SR 99 NB Ramps
o t- co hil
1 0
0 Private Owy
0 0
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 850* ------ 58
r NJ NJ
*ltb
ctnsCXIco
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 851
36 Adams Ave
I
I
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment 1 iatterspn 7\V" and Golden Slain Blvd 111 o co CMO) 61 i
l/RP4 TECHNOIOGIEI. INC
V'frP4 rwtwtMM t*c 425
Section , Item D
3-11 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-8
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
co tn
co ■tr
k
t ____ 39
I 24
•
ItbO CT> CM
f?
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ’ 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd ij 48 12
0 39
25 00 COCD
r- tr CO
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
3 8
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 128
184
• ------ 109
181
S8
299
152
351
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps ISOl ---------* OF nil tn
r- co
t- CM — 43
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
CO
CDCM — CMCO
•
115 t 25 -------
z -»
86 j
co co
xr v- co
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
190 — »
nr
t— CD
in
3 lefterson AVi- and Golden Stale Blvd
to in CMco
-J 1 1
nilco o COCD
CO
.© 43 — I
36 |
A
Private Dwv oom
e
g T- co
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-8
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
co tn
co ■tr
k
t ____ 39
I 24
•
ItbO CT> CM
f?
6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave ’ 7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd ij 48 12
0 39
25 00 COCD
r- tr CO
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
3 8
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 415
111 128
184
• ------ 109
181
S8
299
152
351
l/RP4 TECHNOLOGIES.INC
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps ISOl ---------* OF nil tn
r- co
t- CM — 43
11 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
CO
CDCM — CMCO
•
115 t 25 -------
z -»
86 j
co co
xr v- co
LEGEND
Project Site
O Study Intersection
------ Existing Roadway
® Stop Sign
LaneGeometry
------- Study RoadwaySegment
190 — »
nr
t— CD
in
3 lefterson AVi- and Golden Stale Blvd
to in CMco
-J 1 1
nilco o COCD
CO
.© 43 — I
36 |
A
Private Dwv oom
e
g T- co
426
Section , Item D
3-12 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic
Figure
3-9

6. Lincoln Ave and F owler Ave
43 0
74 21
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave
2 American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB Un Ramp 254
94 240
97 105 LEGEND
172 Study Intersection
308
367
512
------ Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
Lane Geometry
Study RoadwaySegment
i/rpa TECHNOtOGIES. /WC
7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd

O CMCXI CD CO
Jib
t 158
•
0 f 4 ------ o i 2 f
602
18"'
5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave
* ------ 852
* ------ 58
r
•
*]IPO
coco
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/ Clovis Ave Frontage

9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps *1
- 107
* --------- 944
101
— 303 ___.
$
1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
to r-- cij C to r- CM(0
109 t 36- 2 »
253 j 3 \
299— _»
15 |
188 ------* t ___eos r*
1 tofferson AV1
i> mid Golden Stele Blvd
to „
< ____ 1127
86 ___J
61 I nil
o to CMCM
CO
o co hil
Private Dwv
T- O O
• 1 f 0 ------<->
o ; 4 -J
1 1149 ------* 0 “T*
V'RPA rHWWMWtir*c 427
Section , Item D
3-13 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-2
Intersection Operations

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 12.3 B 13.4 B 14.2 B
PM 12.1 B 14.1 B 14.3 B AM 7.8 A 7.9 A 7.9 A
PM 7.7 A 7.8 A 7.8 A
AM 12.9 B >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
PM 14.0 B >50.0 F * >50.0 F * AM 27.1 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F * PM 27.5 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F * AM 16.4 C 32.4 D 32.8 D
PM 24.6 C >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
AM 10.4 B 11.2 B 11.3 B
PM 10.2 B 10.9 B 11.0 B
AM 13.2 B 31.1 D 36.1 E
PM 16.9 C >50.0 F * >50.0 F
AM 9.3 A 9.0 A 9.3 A
PM 9.3 A 9.5 A 9.5 A
AM 21.2 C 44.6 E * >50.0 F *
PM 17.5 C 29.0 D 31.2 D
AM 9.6 A 9.4 A 10.0 B
PM 10.9 B 11.0 B 11.1 B AM >50.0 F * >50.0 F * >50.0 F PM >50.0 F * >50.0 F >50.0 F AM 9.7 A 10.4 B 10.5 B
PM 10.4 B 12.1 B 12.1 B AM 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A
PM 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A
AM 21.2 C >50.0 F >50.0 F PM 16.1 C >50.0 F >50.0 F AM 22.8 C >50.0 F >50.0 F PM 17.9 C >50.0 F >50.0 F DELAY is meas ured in seconds LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS s tandard has been exceeded * Does not meet peak hour signal warrants.
10 11
12 13
14 5
6 7
8 9
1 2
3 4

INTERSECTION
Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps One Way Stop D
(1) Synchro does n’t generate a delay for intersections without a traffic control. A ‘dummy leg’ with a stop control and no volumes was input into the Synchro model. 15 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave All Way Stop D Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps One Way Stop D
Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp One Way Stop D
Adams Ave SR 99 NB On Ramps No Control(1) D
Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave One Way Stop D
Clovis Ave and Jeffers on Ave One Way Stop D

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT
American Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp No Control (1) D

CONTROL TARGET

LOS PEAK HOUR

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT
American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp Two-way Stop D
D
Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave One Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Lincoln Ave Two Way Stop
Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave Two Way Stop
Fowler Ave and Clayton Ave One Way Stop
Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps D
CD
C
For all-way stop controlled intersections , delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For two-way and one-way s top controlled i ntersections, delay results s how the delay for the worst movement.

One Way Stop
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 428
Section , Item D
3-14 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-3
Queuing Operations
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
SB Right 225 18 3 25 5 25 5
NB Left 150 3 0 5 5 5 5
SB Right 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 75 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 150 3 5 5 10 5 10
SB Right 125 0 0 0 0 0 0
NB Left 150 13 8 33 13 33 15
WB Left 50 10 8 35 18 40 20
SB Right 50 0 0 5 8 8 8
NB Left 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB Left 125 65 58 200 98 208 113
EB Left 75 315 280 245 448 510 503
EB Right 150 5 23 10 35 10 35
NB Right 100 13 28 20 48 20 50
WB Left 50 85 80 263 210 275 270
EB Left 50 15 15 35 30 35 33
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes exceedance

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden Sta te Bl vd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave a nd Jefferson Ave
5 Clovis Ave a nd Lincoln Ave
7 Golden Sta te Bl vd and Clayton Ave
9 Clovis Ave a nd SR 99 NB Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave a nd SR 99 SB On Ramp
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 429
Section , Item D
3-15 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Traffic Impacts
Table 3-4
Roadway Segment Operations

VOLUME LOS VOLUME LOS VOLUME LOS AM 140 C 186 C 201 C
PM 137 C 185 C 198 C AM 190 C 260 C 275 C
PM 157 C 214 C 227 C AM 108 C 137 C 152 C
PM 142 C 191 C 204 C AM 110 C 14 C 114 C
PM 250 C 16 C 261 C AM 88 C 131 C 131 C
PM 101 C 150 C 150 C AM 8 C 11 C 11 C
PM 3 C 4 C 4 C

STREET SEGMENT SEGMENT DESCRIPTION

ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

TARGET LOS PEAK HOUR HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT EXISTING PLUS PROJECT HORIZON YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Undivided Local C
Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Golden State Boulevard and Fowler Avenue Adams Avenue and Clayton Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Clayton Avenue Lincon Avenue
Jefferson Avenue LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standa rd has been e xceeded Clayton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Collector C Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue 2 Lanes Undivided Local C Lincoln Avenue and Jefferson Avenue 2 Lanes Divided Local C l'X<P4 rnwwwi (*c 430
Section , Item D
4-1 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements

4.0 Roadway Improvements

4.1 Roadway Improvements
As discussed in Section 3.0 (Impacts), roadway improvements may be desirable to support the development of the Project, as well as to accommodate traffic increases related to overall growth in the study area. The Project site, currently outside of the City of Fowler limits but within the City of Fowler’s sphere of influence, proposes land uses of Light Industrial and Medium Low Residential. The Project proposes a 44-lot industrial subdivision on the area with a land use designation of Light Industrial, which is consistent with the General Plan. The Annexation/ Prezone of the subject property would affect traffic operations that may trigger the need for improvements and/or other measures within the study area to address traffic operations. It is recommended that roadway improvements or traffic impact fees be evaluated at the time that additional developments are presented for implementation.

Considering the criteria provided in Section 1.3 (Policies To Maintain Level of Service) and the results presented in Section 3.0, the following improvements may be implemented to alleviate roadway deficiencies identified in this Transportation Impact Study.

INTERSECTIONS

3. Golden State Boulevard and Jefferson Avenue
Recommended improvements:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Widen the eastbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)
Recommended improvements are not sufficient to alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization.

4. Clovis Avenue and Jefferson Avenue
No improvements are recommended.

The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under the Horizon Year scenarios. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection.
mwm.
431
Section , Item D
4-2 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements

5. Clovis Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
Recommended improvements:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)
Recommended improvements are not sufficient to alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization.

7. Clayton Avenue and Golden State Boulevard
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project Conditions
The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under this scenario (PM Peak Hour only). However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. As a result, no improvements are recommended under this scenario.  Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions
o Install a traffic signal
o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a shared left-through lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)

9. SR 99 NB Ramps and Clovis Avenue
No improvements are recommended.

The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under the Horizon Year scenarios (AM Peak Hour only). However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection.

11. SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Avenue
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Existing Plus Project Conditions
mwm.
432
Section , Item D
4-3 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under this scenario. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. As a result, no improvements are recommended under this scenario.

 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the southbound approach to the intersection to include two left turn lanes, a through lane, and a shared through-right lane (adding one left turn lane) o Widen the eastbound approach to the intersection to include one left turn lane, one shared left-through lane, and one right turn lane (adding one left turn lane) Alternatively, a roundabout could be installed at the intersection which would achieve acceptable levels of service (LOS A for AM and PM peak hour) considering the roadway configuration notated below.
 Northbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left-through lane and 1 through-right lane  Southbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left-through lane and 1 through-right lane  Eastbound approach – 2 lane entry: 1 left lane and 1 through-right lane

14. Merced Street and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Avenue
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the northbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane with right-turn overlap phasing (adding one right turn lane with right-turn overlap phasing)
o Widen the southbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a shared through-right lane (adding one left turn lane)

15. Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Horizon Year Without Project and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic Signal when warranted
o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a through lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane).

The level of service resulting from the potential improvements identified above is shown in Table mwm.
433
Section , Item D
4-4 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
4-1 with recommended storage pocket lengths presented in Table 4-2. Figure 4-1 shows the recommended improvements at the respective intersections considering the Horizon Year Plus Project scenario.

It is recommended that the applicant’s team work with the City of Fowler and Caltrans to determine whether any of the improvements described above would be appropriate for implementation as a condition of the Project or would be justification for the payment of fair share fees.

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility
The Project may be required to contribute a fair-share towards the costs of improvements that are identified for the Horizon Year scenario. The intent of determining the equitable responsibility for the improvements identified above for the Horizon Year scenario, is to provide a starting point for early discussions between the applicant and the City of Fowler/Caltrans to address traffic improvement equitability and to calculate the equitable share for mitigating traffic impacts. The formula used to calculate the equitable share responsibility to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities is as follows:

Equitable Share = (Project Trips)/(Horizon Year Plus Project Traffic – Existing Traffic) Table 4-3 shows the Project’s equitable fair share responsibility on a percentage basis for improvements to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities as described above. The equitable fair share responsibility shown in Table 4-3 is the result of LOS enhancements related to capacity. mwm.
434
Section , Item D
4-5 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Proposed LaneGeometry
Figure
4-1
American Ave 5 Lincoln Ave and Clovis Ave 6 Lincoln Ave and Fowler Ave Jefferson Ave Jefferson Ave
Adams Ave
Sumner Ave
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 2 American Ave and SR 99 NB Qn Ramp 12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp 13 Adams Ave and SR 99 NB On Ramp •1 Jefferson Ave and Clovis Ave 15 Merced Street and SR 99 NB Ramps Vrpa TECHNOLOGIES.INC7 Clayton Ave and Golden State Blvd Jib
aaae
4b

10. Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp/
Clovis Ave Frontage 1
8 Clayton Ave and Fowler Ave 9. Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps 1 1 SR 99 SB Ramps and Clovis Ave
4 ILL
a ti __ Lib
LEGEND
Project Site —•
Study Intersection
Existing Roadway
Stop Sign
£ Lane Geometry — Study Roadway Segment
Roadway Improvement
$ New Traffic Signal
3 JeffersonAve and Gohlnr stale?Blvd
4IL
Private Dwv
435
Section , Item D
4-6 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-1
Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 12.9 B >50.0 F >50.0 F
PM 14.0 B >50.0 F >50.0 F
AM 27.1 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
PM 27.5 D >50.0 F * >50.0 F *
AM 16.4 C >50.0 F >50.0 F
PM 24.6 C >50.0 F >50.0 F
AM 13.2 B 31.1 D 3.8 A
PM 16.9 C >50.0 F * 6.3 A
AM 21.2 C 44.6 E * >50.0 F *
PM 17.5 C 29.0 D 31.2 D
AM >50.0 F * 10.8 B 11.9 B
PM >50.0 F * 10.8 B 11.1 B
AM 21.2 C 49.1 D 49.7 D
PM 16.1 C 28.4 C 30.6 C
AM 22.8 C 14.2 B 15.7 B
PM 17.9 C 14.4 B 15.1 B
DELAY is measured in seconds
LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded Recommended i mprovements are not sufficient to alleviate level of servi ce deficiencies at the inters ection. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies. However, this inters ection does not meet the peak hour traffic si gnal warrant becaus e the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. * No improvements are recommended as this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify si gnalization. 15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps D
14 Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave D
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps D
9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps D
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave D
5 Clovis Ave and Lincol n Ave D
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave D
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave D

HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING PLUS

PROJECT

HORIZON YEAR

WITHOUT PROJECT
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
436
Section , Item D
4-7 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-2
Left Turn and Right Turn Storage Requirements
SB Right 225 225
NB Left 150 150
SB Right 150 150
EB Right -- 50
NB Left 150 150
SB Left 150 150
NB Left 75 75
SB Left 150 150
WB Right -- 50
SB Right 125 125
WB Right -- 125
NB Left 150 150
WB Left 50 50
SB Right 50 50
NB Left 50 50
SB Left 125 2 @ 125
EB Left 75 2 @ 75
EB Right 150 150
NB Right 100 100
NB Right -- 375
SB Left -- 350
WB Left 50 50
EB Left 50 50
WB Right -- 50
Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes new or increased storage length

INTERSECTION

EXISTING QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)
1 American Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
3 Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
4 Clovis Ave and Jefferson Ave
5 Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave
7 Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave
9 Clovis Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps
15 Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps

HORIZON YEAR

RECOMMENDED QUEUE
STORAGE LENGTH (ft)
12 Adams Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
14 Merced St/Fowler Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramps
10 Clayton Ave and SR 99 SB Off Ramp
11 Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB On Ramp
VjRP4 rmnwewn i*c
437
Section , Item D
4-8 Clayton and Golden State Blvd Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study, Roadway Improvements
Table 4-3
Horizon Year Equitable Share Responsibility

INTERSECTION PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING PROJECT TRIPS HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT

FAIR SHARE

PERCENTAGE
AM 591 45 1,818 3.7%
PM 699 39 2,131 2.7%
AM 1,323 15 1,982 2.3%
PM 1,429 13 2,137 1.8%
AM 423 105 1,428 10.4%
PM 596 237 2,097 15.8%
AM 1,082 86 1,693 14.1%
PM 1,103 57 1,697 9.6%
AM 1,180 6 1,759 1.0%
PM 1,075 33 1,630 5.9%
AM 1,383 45 2,100 6.3%
PM 1,172 39 1,781 6.4%

14. Merced St and SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave

15. Merced St and SR 99 NB Ramps

7. Golden State Blvd and Clayton Ave

11. Clovis Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps

5. Clovis Ave and Lincoln Ave

3. Golden State Blvd and Jefferson Ave
438
Section , Item D
Clayton and Golden State Blvd. Property Prezone
Transportation Impact Study Appendices
September 2024
Prepared for:

City of Fowler
Prepared by:

VRPA Technologies, Inc.
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93722
In Association With:

Precision Engineering
Vrpa TECHNOIOGIES. INC.
439
Section , Item D
Appendix A – Roadway Functional Class and
Peak Hour Level-of-Service Thresholds
440
Section , Item D
City of Fresno
General Plan and Development Code Update
Master Environmental Impact Report Transportation and Traffic It should be noted that this traditional methodology used to analyze the roadway system does not consider the potential impact on walking, bicycling, and transit. Pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders are all users of the roadway system but may not be fully recognized in the traffic operations analysis and the calculation of LOS. The LOSthresholds in Table 5.14-2 are based on driver's comfort and convenience. Identifying the need for roadway improvements based on the resulting roadway LOScan have unintended impacts to other modes such as increasing the walking time for pedestrians. In evaluating the roadway system, a lower vehicle LOSmay be desired when balanced against other community values related to resource protection, social equity, economic development, and consideration of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users.

Table 5.14-2: Roadway Functional Classand Peak Hour Level-of-Service Thresholds Functional Class Median Lanes
Peak Hour Level of Service Capacity Threshold

A B C D E
Freeway
N/A1 4 2,720 4,460 6,630 7,720 8,630
3+Aux 2,360 3,860 5,640 6,730 7,530
3 2,000 3,270 4,660 5,740 6,430
2+Aux 1,650 2,700 3,850 4,760 5,340
2 1,300 2,130 3,050 3,790 4,260
State Expressway
Divided 6 2,410 3,960 5,730 7,450 8,450
4 1,610 2,650 3,810 4,960 5,630
2 810 1,340 1,890 2,470 2,810
City Expressway
Raised
Median
6 1,860 6,170 6,520
5 1,520 5,110 5,430
4 1,180 4,050 4,340
2 520 1,910 2,160
Super Arterial
Raised
Median
6 4,910 6,240
5 4,040 5,195
4 3,170 4,150
Arterial
Raised
Median
8 2,120 7,070 7,490
6 1,560 5,270 5,610
5 1,280 4,370 4,670
4 1,000 3,470 3,730
3 720 2,555 2,795
2 440 1,640 1,860
TWLTL3 4 940 3,290 3,550
2 420 1,550 1,760
FirstCarbon Solutions M:\DriveT@VOLl\shared\31680016 - Fresno General Plan MEIRXFresnoGPMEIR_FINAL7.22.14X31680016Sec 05-14 Transportation MEIR7.22.14.doc 5.14-7 441
Section , Item D
City of Fresno
General Plan and Development Code Update
Transportation and Traffic Master Environmental Impact Report Peak Hour Levelof ServiceCapacityThreshold
FunctionalClass Median Lanes A B C D E
Undivided 4 770 2,740 2,980
2 340 1,270 1,480
Collector
TWLTL 4 940 3,290 3,550
2 420 1,550 1,760
Undivided 4 770 2,740 2,980
2 340 1,270 1,480
One-Way
Undivided 3 1,960 2,240 2,430 2,610
2 1,250 1,490 1,620 1,740
1 550 740 800 870
Rural State
Highway
Undivided 2 310 570 1,020 1,730 2,470
Rural Arterial
Divided 4 1,950 3,580 3,780
Undivided 2 570 1,230 1,310
Rural
Collector/Local
Undivided 2 700 930 1,000
Notes: 1 N/A - Not applicable for operational class
2 Aux - Auxiliary Lane
3 TWLTL- Two-way Left-turn Lane
- LOSis not achievable because of type of facility.

Source: Fehr & Peers 2012.

Exhibit 5.14-2 shows existing AM peak hour traffic volumes (two-way total) and LOS(SeeAppendix H-3 for detail) and Exhibit 5.14-3 shows existing PM peak hour traffic volumes (two-way total) and LOS(SeeAppendix H-4 for detail). Exhibit 5.14-4 illustrates the planned roadway number of lanes.

Most roadways operate at LOSD or better during the AM and PM peak hours, except for the following, which operate at LOSEand F:

City of Fresno
• Willow Avenue - Copper to Behymer Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Willow Avenue - Behymer Avenue to Shepherd Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour) • Golden State Boulevard - Shaw Avenue to Swift Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour) • Golden State Boulevard - Motel Drive to Ashlan Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • NeesAvenue - Jordan Avenue to PaulaAvenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Cornelia Avenue - Ashlan Avenue to Griffith Way (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Marks Avenue - Dakota Avenue to Weber Avenue (LOSEduring the PM peak hour) • Clinton Avenue - Valentine Avenue to Marks Avenue (LOSF during the PM peak hour)

5.14-8 FirstCarbon Solutions M:\DriveT@VOLl\shared\31680016 - Fresno General Plan MEIR\Fresno GPMEIR_FINAL7.22.14\31680016 Sec05-14 Transportation MEIR7.22.14.doc 442 Section , Item D
Appendix B – Traffic Counts
443
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-001 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 2 71 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 1 71 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 4 0 TEV 128 0 149 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.70 0.83
4 0 2 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 4 67 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 3 47 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 75

NORTHBOUND
N Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 73 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
5 0 5

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 71
N Fowler Ave & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
N Fowler Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 48 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
130
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
110
120
0 0
2 0
0 4
0680
4630
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
4 0
0 1
1700
2450
444
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-002 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 2 150 0 1 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 391 2 1 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 2
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
1 0 3 0 TEV 424 0 597 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.94 0.83
0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 1 191 5 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 266 1 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 151

NORTHBOUND
Golden State Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
7 0 1
Cars (AM) 393 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
2 0 1

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 196
Golden State Blvd & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Golden State Blvd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 270 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0260
0170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
0 1
0 0
0200
0190
1 0
0 1
0 3
03652
11745
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
0 0
0 1
21300
02471
445
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-003 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 12 239 0 1 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 5 359 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 0 40 0 TEV 596 0 700 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.91 0.82
18 0 31 0
0 0 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 10 254 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 4 19 283 0 AM
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 294
S Golden State Blvd & E Jefferson Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Golden State Blvd Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 304 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 391 HT (AM)
E Jefferson Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Jefferson Ave
31 0 15

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 261

NORTHBOUND
S Golden State Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
4 0
0 1
1230
3140
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
8 0
0 8
4280
3280
0 0
27 0
0 39
43360
72400
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
10 0
0 12
82110
162550
446
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-004 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 1 749 3 5 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 613 2 8 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 1 0 4
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 TEV 1306 0 1394 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.97 0.96
1 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 3 766 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 1 3 537 1 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 751

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
2 0 4
Cars (AM) 613 HT (AM)
E Jefferson Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Jefferson Ave
4 0 3

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 776
S Clovis Ave & E Jefferson Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 547 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0421
0550
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 0
1 0
0 0
0901
1430
1 0
0 0
0 1
05711
37110
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
3 0
0 0
0 1
16592
24941
447
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-005 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 720 30 2 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 572 39 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 18 0 26
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 18 0 16
0 0 0 0 TEV 1325 0 1429 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.97 0.94
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 757 25 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 516 15 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 736

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
64 0 45
Cars (AM) 590 HT (AM)
E Lincoln Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Lincoln Ave
0 0 0

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 775
S Clovis Ave & E Lincoln Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 544 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0411
0573
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 2
0 0
0881
0431
18 0
0 16
0 0
053138
070022
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
26 0
0 14
0 0
063229
047314
448
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-006 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 1 47 9 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 2 53 3 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0
0 5 0 5
1 29 0 32
0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8
0 0 0 0 TEV 194 0 233 0 0 0 0
26 0 50 1 PHF 0.90 0.90
17 0 14 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 6 66 2 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 12 31 6 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 72

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
55 0 41
Cars (AM) 70 HT (AM)
E Lincoln Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Lincoln Ave
45 0 37

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 71
S Fowler Ave & E Lincoln Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 36 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3
1 1
3 0
020
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
1 1
1 0
100
002
5 26
13 2
47 0
2513
6622
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
5 32
16 7
25 0
0479
12314
449
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-007 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 63 0 72
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 299 0 398 0 0 0 0
119 0 125 1 PHF 0.86 0.87
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 3 0 207 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 1 0 107 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
332 0 226
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
E Adams Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Adams Ave
73 0 66

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0
SR 99 SB Ramps & E Adams Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3
0 0
6 0
000
007
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1
0 0
5 0
000
007
0 60
0 0
119
0 000
30200
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 71
0 0
114
0 000
10100
450
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-008 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
1 171 0 279
1 63 0 75
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 580 0 570 0 0 0 0
226 0 336 1 PHF 0.95 0.87
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB on ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
336 0 226
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
W Adams Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
W Adams Ave
75 0 63

CONTROL
No Control
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 171
SR 99 NB on ramps & W Adams Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB on ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 279 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 3
0 0
13 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
12 1
0 0
12 0
000
000
163
60 0 0
323
0 000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
267
74 0 0
214
0 000
000
451
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-009 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 41 151 545 2 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 31 173 427 2 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 0 65 0 TEV 1084 0 1105 0 0 0 0
17 0 24 1 PHF 0.94 0.84
58 0 170 1
0 1 2 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 2 201 10 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 4 232 9 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 209

NORTHBOUND
S Clovis Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
461 0 571
Cars (AM) 343 HT (AM)
SR 99 SB Ramps

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
SR 99 SB Ramps
45 0 33

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 268
S Clovis Ave & SR 99 SB Ramps
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Clovis Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 259 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
10 0
0 4
41832
0142
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
6 0
4 2
13566
0182
0 0
160 0
24 61
27155395
21878
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
52 0
13 23
40116479
42147
452
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-010 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 21 72 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 14 196 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 33 0 42
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 172 0 305 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.93 0.67
37 0 62 1
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0
SR 99 SB Off Ramp & E Clayton Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Off Ramp Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 258 HT (AM)
E Clayton Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
E Clayton Ave
63 0 47

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 109

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 4
6 0
0 0
380
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
4 0
0 0
190
000
0 29
56 0
0 0
111880
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 42
33 0
0 0
20630
000
453
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 23-090143-011 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 19 702 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 27 605 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 0 0
1 573 0 416
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 24 0 29
0 0 0 0 TEV 1423 0 1494 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.97
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 68 196 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 118 139 0 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 769
SR 99 NB Ramps & S Clovis Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB Ramps Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 11/14/2023

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 555 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 630 HT (AM)
S Clovis Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
S Clovis Ave
137 0 95

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 731

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
53 0
0 5
0 0
4550
2170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
37 0
0 0
0 0
21070
5150
520
0 0 19
0 0
235500
661790
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
379
0 0 29
0 0
175950
1131240
454
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-001 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 134 0 115 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 34 0 73 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
1 65 0 122
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 473 0 419 0 0 0 0
102 0 247 1 PHF 0.79 0.81
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
320 0 217
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
American Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
American Ave
256 0 99

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (SB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0
SR 99 SB Off Ramp & American Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 SB Off Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 0
0 7
0 0
12 0
108
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 22
0 0
18 0
9015
000
0 58
0 0
235
0 33065
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 100
0 0
84 0
1250100
000
455
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-002 Day:

City: Fresno Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0

0.5 139 0 89

0.5 65 0 124
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
46 0 116 0 TEV 434 0 523 0 0 0 0
175 0 203 1 PHF 0.73 0.80
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB On Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
203 0 175
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
American Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
American Ave
124 0 65

CONTROL
No Control
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 255
SR 99 NB On Ramp & American Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB On Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 135 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 0
8 7
0 0
12 8
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
10 19
0 0
23 7
000
000
131
58 0 0
191
108
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
79 105
0 0
152
39 000
000
456
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-003 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 14 85 202 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 32 126 172 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM

0.5 0.5 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 116 0 98
0 0 0 0 0 215 0 217
0 0 0 0 TEV 1180 0 1074 0 0 0 0
201 0 135 2 PHF 0.91 0.94
27 0 32 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 13 0 233 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 10 0 326 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 329

NORTHBOUND
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
540 0 729
Cars (AM) 373 HT (AM)
Merced St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Merced St
122 0 161

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Merced St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramp Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 2
0 2
0 4
4 0
146
009
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 6
1 16
2 0
0914
108
0 114
32 211
131
0 31122166
130224
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 92
26 201
199
0 1476188
90318
457
Section , Item D
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-090021-004 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
0 188 0 210
1 306 0 307
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
161 0 152 0 TEV 1383 0 1172 0 0 0 0
568 0 386 1 PHF 0.92 0.94
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 24 4 112 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 12 0 125 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
498 0 693
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Merced St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Merced St
319 0 330

CONTROL
1-Way Stop (NB)
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 344
SR 99 NB Ramps & Merced St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99 NB Ramps Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/22/2024

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 371 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 000 2
7 5
0 0
8 11
000
119
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
7 21
0 0
20 4
000
2011
181
301
0 0
378
141
000
233103
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
203
286
0 0
548
157
000
100114
458
Section , Item D
Appendix C – Synchro Worksheets
459
Section , Item D

EXISTING CONDITIONS
460
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 115 134
Future Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 115 134
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 129 154 0 146 170
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 283 154
Stage 1 - - - - 154 -
Stage 2 - - - - 129 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 684 879
Stage 1 0 - - 0 848 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 870 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 684 879
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 684 -
Stage 1 - - - - 848 -
Stage 2 - - - - 870 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 684 879
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.213 0.193
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 11.7 10.1
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.8 0.7
+ + r
461
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 175 0 0 124 82 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 46 175 0 0 124 82 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 63 240 0 0 170 112 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - - - 0 - 240
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - 0 0 - 0 0 796
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - - - - - - 796
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1332 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.047 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.1 - -
462
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 18 239 12 19 283
Future Vol, veh/h 20 18 239 12 19 283
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 22 20 263 13 21 311
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 479 132 0 0 276 0
Stage 1 263 - - - - -
Stage 2 216 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 426 779 - - 1228 -
Stage 1 650 - - - - -
Stage 2 692 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 412 779 - - 1228 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 412 - - - - -
Stage 1 650 - - - - -
Stage 2 668 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.4 0 0.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 1228 - 530 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.079 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - 12.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - -
463
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 537 1 3 749 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 537 1 3 749 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 33 38 90 25 75 92 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 4 16 0 0 8 597 4 4 814 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1139 1441 409 1030 1441 301 818 0 0 601 0 0 Stage 1 824 824 - 615 615 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 315 617 - 415 826 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 130 493 186 130 692 634 - - 788 - - Stage 1 259 383 - 443 478 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 571 477 - 583 382 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 114 128 493 182 128 692 634 - - 788 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 114 128 - 182 128 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 256 381 - 437 472 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 564 471 - 575 380 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 25.3 26.7 0.1 0

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 634 - - 185 182 788 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.043 0.088 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.8 - - 25.3 26.7 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
464
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 516 15 30 720
Future Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 516 15 30 720
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 92 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 16 27 0 532 15 31 742
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1014 289 742 0 0 562 0
Stage 1 555 - - - - - -
Stage 2 459 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 218 705 482 - - 999 -
Stage 1 511 - - - - - -
Stage 2 575 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 203 695 482 - - 985 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 203 - - - - - -
Stage 1 504 - - - - - -
Stage 2 543 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.3 0 0.4

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 482 - - 361 985 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.12 0.031 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 16.3 8.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 -
fl ft* ft
465
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 31 60 9 47 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 31 60 9 47 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 29 19 9 36 6 13 34 67 10 52 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 188 200 53 191 167 68 53 0 0 101 0 0 Stage 1 73 73 - 94 94 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 115 127 - 97 73 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 694 1012 767 724 992 1546 - - 1485 - - Stage 1 934 832 - 910 815 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 887 789 - 907 832 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 728 683 1012 719 712 992 1546 - - 1485 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 728 683 - 719 712 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 926 826 - 902 808 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 836 782 - 853 826 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.9 10.2 0.9 1.2

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1546 - - 784 736 1485 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.061 0.068 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 0 - 9.9 10.2 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
466
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 150 2 0 266 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 150 2 0 266 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 160 2 0 283 1
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 302 444 80 365 446 142 284 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 160 160 - 284 284 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 142 284 - 81 162 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 625 505 961 462 503 747 1268 - - 1407 - - Stage 1 823 762 - 581 673 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 843 673 - 795 761 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 505 961 461 503 747 1268 - - 1407 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 623 505 - 461 503 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 823 762 - 581 673 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 841 673 - 794 761 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.1 10.8 0 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1407 - - 505 619 1268 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.005 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 12.1 10.8 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
467
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 4 3 47 71 2
Future Vol, veh/h 1 4 3 47 71 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 1 6 4 67 101 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 184 105 106 0 - 0
Stage 1 105 - - - - -
Stage 2 79 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 803 947 1313 - - -
Stage 1 917 - - - - -
Stage 2 942 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 797 945 1310 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 797 - - - - -
Stage 1 912 - - - - -
Stage 2 940 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9 0.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1310 - 911 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
468
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 416 118 139 0 0 702 19
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 416 118 139 0 0 702 19
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 31 0 438 124 146 0 0 739 20
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 764 - - 759 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 394 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 370 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 338 0 0 835 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 647 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 666 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 288 0 - 835 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 288 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 551 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 666 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 19 4.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 835 - 288 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - 0.106 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 19 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.4 - - -
469
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 72 21 42 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 72 21 42 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 40 77 23 45 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 77 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 77 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 924 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 943 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 924 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 924 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 943 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 924 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
470
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 545 151 41
Future Vol, veh/h 25 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 545 151 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 27 18 62 0 0 0 4 247 10 580 161 44
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1475 1598 103 205 0 0 247 0 0
Stage 1 1343 1343 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 132 255 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 111 85 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Stage 1 197 182 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 862 644 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 59 0 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 59 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 196 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 461 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.9 0.1 7.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1356 - - 59 907 1246 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.757 0.068 0.465 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - 165.6 9.3 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 3.3 0.2 2.5 - -
f'h
471
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 119 0 0 72 1 107
Future Vol, veh/h 119 0 0 72 1 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 138 0 0 84 1 124
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 222 138
Stage 1 - - - - 138 -
Stage 2 - - - - 84 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 764 897
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 886 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 937 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 764 897
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 764 -
Stage 1 - - - - 886 -
Stage 2 - - - - 937 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 905 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.139 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - -
472
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 226 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 226 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 238 0 0 79 294 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 238
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 798
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 798
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
473
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 125 161 568 0 0 307 210
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 125 161 568 0 0 307 210
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 0 136 175 617 0 0 334 228
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1415 1529 617 562 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 967 967 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 448 562 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 138 117 476 999 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 342 331 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 607 508 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 114 0 476 999 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 114 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 282 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 607 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 21 2.1 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 999 - 372 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.175 - 0.4 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 21 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.9 - -
474
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 20.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 217 98 0 Future Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 217 98 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 222 93 15 11 0 358 0 221 30 238 108 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 23.8 22.5 18.4 18.1

HCM LOS C C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 228 336 301 217 98
LT Vol 0 10 202 217 0
Through Vol 201 0 85 0 98
RT Vol 27 326 14 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 251 369 331 238 108
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.52 0.677 0.668 0.546 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.474 6.605 7.269 8.238 7.776
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 481 546 496 439 462
Service Time 5.533 4.657 5.322 5.99 5.528
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.522 0.676 0.667 0.542 0.234
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.4 22.5 23.8 20.5 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C C C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.9 5.1 4.9 3.2 0.9
475
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 73 34
Future Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 73 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 305 80 0 90 42
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 385 80
Stage 1 - - - - 80 -
Stage 2 - - - - 305 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 601 977
Stage 1 0 - - 0 921 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 728 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 601 977
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 601 -
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 728 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 601 977
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.15 0.043
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.5 0.1
+ + r
476
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 116 203 0 0 65 139 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 116 203 0 0 65 139 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 145 254 0 0 81 174 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 81 0 - - - 0 - 254
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - 0 0 - 0 0 782
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - - - - 782
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1486 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.3 - -
477
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 31 359 5 10 254
Future Vol, veh/h 40 31 359 5 10 254
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 49 38 438 6 12 310
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 635 219 0 0 444 0
Stage 1 438 - - - - -
Stage 2 197 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 409 752 - - 937 -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 814 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 397 752 - - 937 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 397 - - - - -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 790 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.7 0 0.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 937 - 500 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.173 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - 13.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.6 - -
478
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 766 0 2 613 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 766 0 2 613 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25 38 93 25 25 96 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 8 824 0 8 639 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1083 1495 320 1176 1495 412 639 0 0 824 0 0 Stage 1 655 655 - 840 840 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 428 840 - 336 655 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 170 121 673 145 121 586 934 - - 556 - - Stage 1 419 458 - 324 377 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 572 377 - 649 458 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 166 118 673 143 118 586 934 - - 556 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 166 118 - 143 118 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 415 452 - 321 374 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 563 374 - 640 452 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 27.2 11.2 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 934 - - 166 586 556 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.024 0.007 0.014 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - - 27.2 11.2 11.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
479
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 757 25 39 572
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 757 25 39 572
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 19 19 0 805 27 41 609
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1239 431 609 0 0 847 0
Stage 1 834 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 155 570 586 - - 780 -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 616 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 142 562 586 - - 769 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 142 - - - - - -
Stage 1 360 - - - - - -
Stage 2 573 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 24.1 0 0.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 586 - - 227 769 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.169 0.054 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 24.1 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.6 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
480
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 66 2 3 53 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 66 2 3 53 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 56 16 3 32 6 7 73 2 3 59 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 173 155 60 190 155 74 61 0 0 75 0 0 Stage 1 66 66 - 88 88 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 107 89 - 102 67 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 788 735 1003 768 735 985 1536 - - 1518 - - Stage 1 942 838 - 917 820 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 896 819 - 902 837 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 753 730 1003 708 730 985 1536 - - 1518 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 753 730 - 708 730 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 937 836 - 912 816 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 851 815 - 827 835 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.1 10.1 0.6 0.4

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1536 - - 776 754 1518 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.092 0.055 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.1 10.1 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.2 0 - -
481
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 2 0 1 2 391 0 1 191 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 2 0 1 2 391 0 1 191 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 2 0 1 2 471 0 1 230 6
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 592 713 236 477 710 118 236 0 0 471 0 0 Stage 1 475 475 - 235 235 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 117 238 - 242 475 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 388 354 763 376 355 908 1321 - - 1080 - - Stage 1 537 553 - 627 707 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 872 705 - 620 553 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 386 353 763 372 354 908 1321 - - 1080 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 386 353 - 372 354 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 536 552 - 626 706 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 870 704 - 615 552 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 15.3 12.8 0 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1080 - - 353 463 1321 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.01 0.008 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 0 - 15.3 12.8 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
482
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 2 4 47 71 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 2 4 47 71 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 5 2 5 57 86 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 160 89 89 0 - 0
Stage 1 89 - - - - -
Stage 2 71 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 829 966 1500 - - -
Stage 1 932 - - - - -
Stage 2 949 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 823 964 1497 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 823 - - - - -
Stage 1 927 - - - - -
Stage 2 947 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.2 0.6 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1497 - 865 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
483
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 573 68 196 0 0 605 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 573 68 196 0 0 605 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 25 0 591 70 202 0 0 624 28
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 654 - - 652 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 342 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 312 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 361 0 0 924 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 640 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 665 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 334 0 - 924 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 334 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 591 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 665 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.6 2.4 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 924 - 334 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - 0.074 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 - 16.6 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 0.2 - - -
484
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 196 14 33 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 196 14 33 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 67 67 67 67 67 67
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 93 293 21 49 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 293 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 293 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 677 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 735 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 677 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 677 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 735 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 677 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
485
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 29.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 427 173 31
Future Vol, veh/h 65 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 427 173 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 77 29 202 0 0 0 2 239 12 508 206 37
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1365 1484 122 243 0 0 239 0 0
Stage 1 1241 1241 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 124 243 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 134 123 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Stage 1 228 243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 876 701 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 81 0 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 81 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 228 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 529 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 108 0.1 6.5

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1313 - - 81 894 1282 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 1.308 0.226 0.397 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - 294.7 10.2 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 8.1 0.9 1.9 - -
f'h
486
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 0 0 63 3 207
Future Vol, veh/h 123 0 0 63 3 207
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 141 0 0 72 3 238
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 213 141
Stage 1 - - - - 141 -
Stage 2 - - - - 72 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 773 904
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 883 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 948 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 773 904
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 773 -
Stage 1 - - - - 883 -
Stage 2 - - - - 948 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 917 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.263 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.1 - -
487
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 386 0 0 72 197 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 386
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 660
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 660
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
488
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 112 152 386 0 0 306 188
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 112 152 386 0 0 306 188
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 4 119 162 411 0 0 326 200
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1161 1261 411 526 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 735 735 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 526 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 214 157 628 1016 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 471 400 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 655 500 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 180 0 628 1016 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 180 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 396 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 655 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.5 2.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1016 - 436 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 - 0.342 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 - 17.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.5 - -
489
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.2
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 215 116 0 Future Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 215 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 183 134 34 14 0 248 0 144 34 229 123 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.4 13.2 12.9 14.7

HCM LOS C B B B
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 167 246 330 215 116
LT Vol 0 13 172 215 0
Through Vol 135 0 126 0 116
RT Vol 32 233 32 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 178 262 351 229 123
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.328 0.426 0.606 0.465 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.644 5.856 6.219 7.312 6.801
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 540 615 579 492 528
Service Time 4.697 3.901 4.261 5.058 4.547
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.33 0.426 0.606 0.465 0.233
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.9 13.2 18.4 16.3 11.6
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2.1 4 2.4 0.9
490
Section , Item D

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
491
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 154 134
Future Vol, veh/h 0 102 122 0 154 134
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 129 154 0 195 170
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 283 154
Stage 1 - - - - 154 -
Stage 2 - - - - 129 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 684 879
Stage 1 0 - - 0 848 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 870 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 684 879
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 684 -
Stage 1 - - - - 848 -
Stage 2 - - - - 870 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 684 879
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.285 0.193
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12.3 10.1
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.2 0.7
+ + r
492
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 214 0 0 124 88 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 46 214 0 0 124 88 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 63 293 0 0 170 121 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - - - 0 - 293
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - 0 0 - 0 0 744
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1332 - - - - - - 744
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.4 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1332 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.047 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.1 - -
493
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 18 278 12 19 289
Future Vol, veh/h 20 18 278 12 19 289
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 22 20 305 13 21 318
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 524 153 0 0 318 0
Stage 1 305 - - - - -
Stage 2 219 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 396 753 - - 1183 -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 689 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 382 753 - - 1183 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 382 - - - - -
Stage 1 615 - - - - -
Stage 2 665 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 12.9 0 0.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 1183 - 498 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.084 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 - 12.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - -
494
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 539 1 3 762 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 539 1 3 762 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 33 38 90 25 75 92 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 4 16 0 0 8 599 4 4 828 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1154 1457 416 1039 1457 302 832 0 0 603 0 0 Stage 1 838 838 - 617 617 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 316 619 - 422 840 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 111 127 487 183 127 691 625 - - 786 - - Stage 1 254 377 - 442 477 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 570 476 - 577 377 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 109 125 487 179 125 691 625 - - 786 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 109 125 - 179 125 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 251 375 - 436 471 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 563 470 - 569 375 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 26.2 27.1 0.1 0

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 625 - - 178 179 786 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.045 0.089 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.8 - - 26.2 27.1 9.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
495
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 518 15 30 733
Future Vol, veh/h 16 26 0 518 15 30 733
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 92 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 16 27 0 534 15 31 756
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1023 290 756 0 0 564 0
Stage 1 557 - - - - - -
Stage 2 466 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 215 704 472 - - 997 -
Stage 1 510 - - - - - -
Stage 2 570 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 200 694 472 - - 983 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 200 - - - - - -
Stage 1 503 - - - - - -
Stage 2 538 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.4 0 0.3

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 472 - - 358 983 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.121 0.031 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 16.4 8.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 -
fl ft* ft
496
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 33 60 9 60 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 17 8 32 5 12 33 60 9 60 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 29 19 9 36 6 13 37 67 10 67 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 206 218 68 209 185 71 68 0 0 104 0 0 Stage 1 88 88 - 97 97 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 118 130 - 112 88 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 750 678 992 746 708 989 1527 - - 1481 - - Stage 1 917 820 - 907 813 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 884 787 - 891 820 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 708 667 992 699 697 989 1527 - - 1481 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 708 667 - 699 697 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 909 814 - 899 806 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 833 780 - 837 814 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10 10.4 0.8 1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1527 - - 766 721 1481 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.062 0.069 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10 10.4 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
497
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 9 0 29 18 150 2 0 266 53
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 9 0 29 18 150 2 0 266 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 10 0 31 19 160 2 0 283 56
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 340 537 80 430 511 170 339 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 198 198 - 311 311 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 142 339 - 119 200 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 587 447 961 410 462 713 1210 - - 1407 - - Stage 1 782 734 - 557 654 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 843 636 - 750 732 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 554 439 961 404 454 713 1210 - - 1407 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 554 439 - 404 454 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 769 722 - 548 654 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 807 636 - 736 720 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.2 11.4 0.9 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1407 - - 439 604 1210 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.067 0.016 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 13.2 11.4 8 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.2 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
498
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 6 16 47 71 15
Future Vol, veh/h 3 6 16 47 71 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 4 9 23 67 101 21
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 231 114 124 0 - 0
Stage 1 114 - - - - -
Stage 2 117 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 755 936 1292 - - -
Stage 1 908 - - - - -
Stage 2 906 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 738 934 1290 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 738 - - - - -
Stage 1 889 - - - - -
Stage 2 904 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 2 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1290 - 858 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.1 - 0 - -
499
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 468 118 217 0 0 710 31
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 0 468 118 217 0 0 710 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 31 0 493 124 228 0 0 747 33
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 850 - - 780 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 476 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 374 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 298 0 0 820 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 588 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 663 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 253 0 - 820 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 253 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 499 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 663 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 21.2 3.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 820 - 253 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 - 0.121 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 - 21.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.4 - - -
500
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 150 21 42 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 150 21 42 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 40 161 23 45 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 161 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 161 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 828 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 865 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 828 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 828 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 865 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 828 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
501
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 79.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 103 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 553 151 41
Future Vol, veh/h 103 17 58 0 0 0 4 232 9 553 151 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 110 18 62 0 0 0 4 247 10 588 161 44
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1491 1614 103 205 0 0 247 0 0
Stage 1 1359 1359 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 132 255 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 108 83 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Stage 1 193 178 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 862 644 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 57 0 907 1356 - - 1246 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 57 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 192 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 455 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 490.6 0.1 7.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1356 - - 57 907 1246 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 2.24 0.068 0.472 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - -$ 723.2 9.3 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 12.6 0.2 2.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
502
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 132 0 0 74 1 107
Future Vol, veh/h 132 0 0 74 1 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 153 0 0 86 1 124
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 239 153
Stage 1 - - - - 153 -
Stage 2 - - - - 86 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 747 880
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 873 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 935 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 747 880
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 747 -
Stage 1 - - - - 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - 935 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 9.7

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 888 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.141 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - -
503
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 241 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 241 0 0 75 279 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 254 0 0 79 294 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 254
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 782
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 782
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
504
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 164 161 568 0 0 313 210
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 0 164 161 568 0 0 313 210
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 0 178 175 617 0 0 340 228
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1421 1535 617 568 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 967 967 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 454 568 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 137 116 476 994 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 342 331 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 603 505 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 113 0 476 994 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 113 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 282 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 603 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 22.8 2.1 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 994 - 390 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 - 0.491 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 22.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 2.6 - -
505
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.2
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 223 98 0 Future Vol, veh/h 202 85 14 10 0 326 0 201 27 223 98 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 222 93 15 11 0 358 0 221 30 245 108 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 24.1 22.8 18.6 18.6

HCM LOS C C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 228 336 301 223 98
LT Vol 0 10 202 223 0
Through Vol 201 0 85 0 98
RT Vol 27 326 14 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 251 369 331 245 108
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.523 0.681 0.671 0.562 0.233
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.511 6.643 7.307 8.253 7.791
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 479 543 493 436 461
Service Time 5.572 4.696 5.363 6.009 5.546
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.524 0.68 0.671 0.562 0.234
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.6 22.8 24.1 21.1 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C C C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3 5.2 4.9 3.4 0.9
506
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 79 34
Future Vol, veh/h 0 247 65 0 79 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 305 80 0 98 42
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 385 80
Stage 1 - - - - 80 -
Stage 2 - - - - 305 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 601 977
Stage 1 0 - - 0 921 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 728 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 601 977
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 601 -
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 728 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 601 977
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.162 0.043
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 12.1 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.6 0.1
+ + r
507
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 116 209 0 0 65 172 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 116 209 0 0 65 172 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 145 261 0 0 81 215 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 81 0 - - - 0 - 261
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - 0 0 - 0 0 775
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - - - - 775
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1486 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.098 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.3 - -
508
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 31 365 5 10 287
Future Vol, veh/h 40 31 365 5 10 287
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 49 38 445 6 12 350
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 662 223 0 0 451 0
Stage 1 445 - - - - -
Stage 2 217 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 393 748 - - 931 -
Stage 1 610 - - - - -
Stage 2 795 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 381 748 - - 931 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 381 - - - - -
Stage 1 610 - - - - -
Stage 2 771 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 14 0 0.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 931 - 485 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.179 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - 14 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.6 - -
509
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 777 0 2 615 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 777 0 2 615 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25 38 93 25 25 96 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 8 835 0 8 641 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1091 1508 321 1188 1508 418 641 0 0 835 0 0 Stage 1 657 657 - 851 851 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 434 851 - 337 657 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 168 119 672 142 119 581 933 - - 550 - - Stage 1 418 457 - 319 372 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 568 372 - 648 457 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 164 116 672 139 116 581 933 - - 550 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 164 116 - 139 116 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 414 450 - 316 369 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 369 - 639 450 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 27.5 11.2 0.1 0.1

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 933 - - 164 581 550 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.024 0.007 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 - - 27.5 11.2 11.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
510
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 768 25 39 574
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 0 768 25 39 574
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 19 19 0 817 27 41 611
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1252 437 611 0 0 859 0
Stage 1 846 - - - - - -
Stage 2 406 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 152 565 585 - - 772 -
Stage 1 359 - - - - - -
Stage 2 616 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 139 557 585 - - 761 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 139 - - - - - -
Stage 1 354 - - - - - -
Stage 2 573 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 24.6 0 0.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 585 - - 222 761 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.173 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 24.6 10 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.6 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
511
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 77 2 3 55 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 50 14 3 29 5 6 77 2 3 55 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 56 16 3 32 6 7 86 2 3 61 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 188 170 62 205 170 87 63 0 0 88 0 0 Stage 1 68 68 - 101 101 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 120 102 - 104 69 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 721 1000 751 721 969 1533 - - 1501 - - Stage 1 940 836 - 903 810 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 882 809 - 899 835 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 735 716 1000 692 716 969 1533 - - 1501 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 735 716 - 692 716 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 935 834 - 898 806 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 838 805 - 824 833 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.2 10.2 0.5 0.4

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1533 - - 763 740 1501 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.093 0.056 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.2 10.2 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.2 0 - -
512
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 47 0 157 30 391 0 1 191 13
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 47 0 157 30 391 0 1 191 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 57 0 189 36 471 0 1 230 16
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 660 791 236 550 783 123 246 0 0 471 0 0 Stage 1 543 543 - 240 240 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 117 248 - 310 543 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 346 319 763 328 322 902 1310 - - 1080 - - Stage 1 489 515 - 622 703 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 872 697 - 558 515 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 265 307 763 316 310 902 1310 - - 1080 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 265 307 - 316 310 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 471 496 - 599 702 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 688 696 - 533 496 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 16.9 14.3 0.7 0

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1080 - - 307 632 1310 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.012 0.389 0.028 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 0 - 16.9 14.3 7.8 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 1.8 0.1 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
513
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 13 6 47 71 3
Future Vol, veh/h 15 13 6 47 71 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 18 16 7 57 86 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 165 90 92 0 - 0
Stage 1 90 - - - - -
Stage 2 75 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 823 965 1496 - - -
Stage 1 931 - - - - -
Stage 2 945 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 963 1493 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 816 - - - - -
Stage 1 924 - - - - -
Stage 2 943 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 0.8 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1493 - 878 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
514
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 581 68 208 0 0 650 94
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 581 68 208 0 0 650 94
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 25 0 599 70 214 0 0 670 97
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 689 - - 767 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 354 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 335 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 342 0 0 836 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 631 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 646 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 313 0 - 836 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 313 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 578 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 646 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.5 2.4 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 836 - 313 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 - 0.079 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 - 17.5 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 - 0.3 - - -
515
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 208 14 33 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 208 14 33 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 67 67 67 67 67 67
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 93 310 21 49 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 310 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 310 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 662 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 722 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 662 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 722 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10.9

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 662 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.074 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
516
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 55.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 77 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 472 173 31
Future Vol, veh/h 77 24 170 0 0 0 2 201 10 472 173 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 92 29 202 0 0 0 2 239 12 562 206 37
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1473 1592 122 243 0 0 239 0 0
Stage 1 1349 1349 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 124 243 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 113 105 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Stage 1 199 216 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 876 701 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 0 894 1313 - - 1282 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 63 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 199 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 492 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v218.1 0.1 7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1313 - - 63 894 1282 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 1.909 0.226 0.438 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - - $ 568 10.2 10 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 11.2 0.9 2.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
517
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 127 0 0 74 3 207
Future Vol, veh/h 127 0 0 74 3 207
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 146 0 0 85 3 238
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 231 146
Stage 1 - - - - 146 -
Stage 2 - - - - 85 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 755 898
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 879 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 936 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 755 898
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 755 -
Stage 1 - - - - 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - 936 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.4

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 911 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.1 - -
518
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 349 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 349 0 0 63 171 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 401 0 0 72 197 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 401
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 647
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 647
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
519
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 118 152 386 0 0 339 188
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 4 118 152 386 0 0 339 188
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 4 126 162 411 0 0 361 200
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1196 1296 411 561 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 735 735 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 461 561 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 204 149 628 986 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 471 400 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 631 482 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 171 0 628 986 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 171 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 394 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 631 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.9 2.6 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 986 - 433 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 - 0.359 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 - 17.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 1.6 - -
520
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 248 116 0 Future Vol, veh/h 172 126 32 13 0 233 0 135 32 248 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 183 134 34 14 0 248 0 144 34 264 123 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.3 13.7 13.2 16.3

HCM LOS C B B C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 167 246 330 248 116
LT Vol 0 13 172 248 0
Through Vol 135 0 126 0 116
RT Vol 32 233 32 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 178 262 351 264 123
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.335 0.437 0.62 0.54 0.235
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.782 6.012 6.362 7.364 6.853
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 529 597 565 491 523
Service Time 4.842 4.064 4.411 5.115 4.603
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.336 0.439 0.621 0.538 0.235
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.2 13.7 19.3 18.5 11.7
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 2.2 4.2 3.2 0.9
521
Section , Item D

HORIZON YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT
522
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 171 199
Future Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 171 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 165 197 0 186 216
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 362 197
Stage 1 - - - - 197 -
Stage 2 - - - - 165 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 616 832
Stage 1 0 - - 0 811 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 838 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 616 832
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 616 -
Stage 1 - - - - 811 -
Stage 2 - - - - 838 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 616 832
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.302 0.26
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 13.4 10.8
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.3 1
+ + r
523
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 260 0 0 184 122 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 68 260 0 0 184 122 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 74 283 0 0 200 133 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 200 0 - - - 0 - 283
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - 0 0 - 0 0 754
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - - - - - 754
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1298 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.057 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.2 - -
524
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 811 28 41 961
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1392 406 0 0 839 0
Stage 1 811 - - - - -
Stage 2 581 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 93 495 - - 742 -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 424 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 86 495 - - 742 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 86 - - - - -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 394 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 66.6 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 742 - 138 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - 0.622 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 66.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 3.3 - -
525
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 798 1 4 1113 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 798 1 4 1113 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 1 7 0 0 4 867 1 4 1210 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1661 2095 606 1489 2095 434 1211 0 0 868 0 0 Stage 1 1219 1219 - 876 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 442 876 - 613 1219 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 42 51 354 85 51 567 426 - - 603 - -
Stage 1 138 249 - 308 362 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 470 362 - 444 249 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 41 50 354 84 50 567 426 - - 603 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 41 50 - 84 50 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 137 247 - 305 359 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 466 359 - 440 247 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 51.4 0.1 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 426 - - 73 84 603 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.03 0.078 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.5 - - 55.8 51.4 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
526
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 791 23 46 1103
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1488 422 1103 0 0 829 0
Stage 1 818 - - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 104 577 283 - - 792 -
Stage 1 370 - - - - - -
Stage 2 444 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 569 283 - - 781 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 94 - - - - - -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 408 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 32.4 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 283 - - 195 781 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.333 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 32.4 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
527
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 46 89 13 70 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 46 89 13 70 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 42 27 13 52 8 20 50 97 14 76 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 274 292 77 278 244 99 77 0 0 147 0 0 Stage 1 105 105 - 139 139 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 187 - 139 105 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 676 617 981 672 656 954 1515 - - 1429 - - Stage 1 898 806 - 862 780 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 831 743 - 862 806 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 617 602 981 607 640 954 1515 - - 1429 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 617 602 - 607 640 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 885 798 - 849 768 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 757 732 - 786 798 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.6 11.2 0.9 1.2

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1515 - - 709 656 1429 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.098 0.111 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.6 11.2 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.4 0 - -
528
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 472 4 0 838 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 472 4 0 838 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 502 4 0 891 2
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 948 1395 251 1144 1398 447 893 0 0 506 0 0 Stage 1 502 502 - 892 892 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 446 893 - 252 506 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 214 139 746 107 138 446 749 - - 1048 - - Stage 1 517 538 - 221 356 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 356 - 610 536 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 212 139 746 106 138 446 749 - - 1048 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 212 139 - 106 138 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 517 538 - 221 356 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 554 356 - 609 536 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 31.1 22.2 0 0

HCM LOS D C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1048 - - 139 216 749 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.008 0.03 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 31.1 22.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
529
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 6 4 70 106 3
Future Vol, veh/h 1 6 4 70 106 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 1 7 4 76 115 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 207 119 120 0 - 0
Stage 1 119 - - - - -
Stage 2 88 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 779 930 1296 - - -
Stage 1 904 - - - - -
Stage 2 933 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 774 928 1294 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 774 - - - - -
Stage 1 899 - - - - -
Stage 2 931 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9 0.4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1294 - 902 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.008 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
530
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 618 175 207 0 0 1043 28
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 618 175 207 0 0 1043 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 45 0 651 184 218 0 0 1098 29
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1135 - - 1127 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 586 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 549 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 194 0 0 604 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 517 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 540 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 135 0 - 604 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 135 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 359 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 540 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 44.6 6.2 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 604 - 135 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.305 - 0.335 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.6 - 44.6 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - E A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 1.4 - - -
531
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 55 107 31 62 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 55 107 31 62 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 59 115 33 67 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 115 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 115 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 879 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 907 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 879 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 879 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 907 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 9.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 879 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 -
532
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 170.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61
Future Vol, veh/h 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 39 27 91 0 0 0 6 367 14 862 238 65
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2191 2374 152 303 0 0 367 0 0
Stage 1 1995 1995 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 196 379 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 36 ~ 25 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Stage 1 85 80 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 561 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 8 0 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 8 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 85 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 184 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 1750.5 0.1 13.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1248 - - 8 842 1119 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 8.245 0.109 0.77 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 - -$ 4165.1 9.8 18.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 9.8 0.4 8 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
533
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 177 0 0 107 1 159
Future Vol, veh/h 177 0 0 107 1 159
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 192 0 0 116 1 173
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 308 192
Stage 1 - - - - 192 -
Stage 2 - - - - 116 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 682 837
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 838 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 906 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 682 837
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 682 -
Stage 1 - - - - 838 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.4

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 842 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.207 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 - -
534
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 336 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 354 0 0 117 437 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 354
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 688
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 688
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
535
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 19.9
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 20 0 202 260 917 0 0 496 339
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2103 2272 917 835 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1437 1437 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 666 835 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 50 40 319 790 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 200 198 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 479 381 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 34 0 319 790 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 34 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 479 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 186.3 2.6 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 790 - 183 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 - 1.212 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 186.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.4 - 11.9 - -
536
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 142.7
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Future Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 350 159 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 191 210.9 83.9 66.6

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 339 499 447 322 146
LT Vol 0 15 300 322 0
Through Vol 299 0 126 0 146
RT Vol 40 484 21 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 368 542 486 350 159
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.986 1.369 1.312 0.995 0.431
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.759 10.159 10.976 11.929 11.456 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 313 363 335 308 317
Service Time 9.759 8.159 8.976 9.629 9.156
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.176 1.493 1.451 1.136 0.502
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 83.9 210.9 191 86.6 22.6
HCM Lane LOS F F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.4 23.9 20.6 10.5 2.1
537
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 108 51
Future Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 108 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 399 105 0 117 55
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 504 105
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 399 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 512 947
Stage 1 0 - - 0 897 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 659 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 512 947
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 512 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 659 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 512 947
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.229 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.1 9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.9 0.2
+ + r
538
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 302 0 0 97 207 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 172 302 0 0 97 207 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 187 328 0 0 105 225 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 105 0 - - - 0 - 328
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - 0 0 - 0 0 711
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - - - - - - 711
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1456 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.4 - -
539
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 20.4
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1218 12 22 862
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1711 609 0 0 1230 0
Stage 1 1218 - - - - -
Stage 2 493 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 81 412 - - 430 -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 576 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 76 412 - - 430 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 76 - - - - -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 537 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 289 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 430 - 115 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.389 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 289 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 11 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 540
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1138 0 3 911 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1138 0 3 911 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 93 92 92 96 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1224 0 3 949 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1575 2187 475 1713 2187 612 949 0 0 1224 0 0 Stage 1 955 955 - 1232 1232 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 620 1232 - 481 955 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 73 45 533 58 45 434 713 - - 360 - -
Stage 1 276 333 - 186 246 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 440 246 - 532 333 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 72 44 533 57 44 434 713 - - 360 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 72 44 - 57 44 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 274 330 - 185 245 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 436 245 - 528 330 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 13.3 0 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 713 - - 72 434 360 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.015 0.003 0.009 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - - 55.8 13.3 15.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
541
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1197 39 62 904
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1826 633 904 0 0 1251 0
Stage 1 1232 - - - - - -
Stage 2 594 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 62 420 380 - - 547 -
Stage 1 221 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 53 414 380 - - 539 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 53 - - - - - -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 90.7 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 380 - - 94 539 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.611 0.114 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 90.7 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.9 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
542
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 98 3 4 79 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 98 3 4 79 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 80 23 4 47 8 10 107 3 4 86 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 252 226 88 276 226 109 89 0 0 110 0 0 Stage 1 96 96 - 129 129 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 156 130 - 147 97 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 699 671 968 674 671 942 1500 - - 1474 - - Stage 1 908 814 - 872 787 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 844 787 - 853 813 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 651 664 968 592 664 942 1500 - - 1474 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 651 664 - 592 664 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 902 812 - 866 781 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 782 781 - 748 811 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.9 10.8 0.6 0.3

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1500 - - 714 684 1474 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.145 0.086 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.9 10.8 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - -
543
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1232 0 2 602 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1232 0 2 602 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 1339 0 2 654 11
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1678 2016 670 1344 2011 333 665 0 0 1339 0 0 Stage 1 1347 1347 - 664 664 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 331 669 - 680 1347 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 57 397 73 58 660 913 - - 506 - -
Stage 1 158 216 - 319 454 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 452 - 311 216 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 60 56 397 67 57 660 913 - - 506 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 60 56 - 67 57 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 155 212 - 314 451 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 647 449 - 299 212 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.6 45.2 0.1 0

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 506 - - 56 96 913 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.078 0.068 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 0 - 74.6 45.2 9 0.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B A - F E A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
544
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 3 6 70 106 1
Future Vol, veh/h 6 3 6 70 106 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 7 3 7 76 115 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 212 118 118 0 - 0
Stage 1 118 - - - - -
Stage 2 94 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 774 931 1464 - - -
Stage 1 905 - - - - -
Stage 2 927 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 767 929 1461 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 767 - - - - -
Stage 1 899 - - - - -
Stage 2 925 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.5 0.6 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1461 - 814 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.012 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
545
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 291 0 0 899 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 291 0 0 899 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 37 0 877 104 300 0 0 927 41
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 972 - - 968 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 508 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 464 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 220 0 0 701 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 521 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 550 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 187 0 - 701 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 187 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 444 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 550 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 29 2.8 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 701 - 187 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - 0.198 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11 - 29 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 - 0.7 - - -
546
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 62 291 21 49 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 62 291 21 49 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 67 316 23 53 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 316 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 316 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 657 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 717 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 657 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 657 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 717 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 11

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 657 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.081 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
547
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 197.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46
Future Vol, veh/h 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 105 39 275 0 0 0 3 325 16 689 279 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1851 2013 165 329 0 0 325 0 0
Stage 1 1682 1682 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 331 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 57 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Stage 1 131 148 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 832 641 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 26 0 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 26 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 131 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 350 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 818 0.1 8.2

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1220 - - 26 838 1189 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 5.56 0.328 0.58 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - -$ 2352.4 11.4 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 17.9 1.4 3.9 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
548
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 0 0 94 4 308
Future Vol, veh/h 186 0 0 94 4 308
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 202 0 0 102 4 335
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 304 202
Stage 1 - - - - 202 -
Stage 2 - - - - 102 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 686 836
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 830 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 920 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 686 836
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 686 -
Stage 1 - - - - 830 -
Stage 2 - - - - 920 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 847 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.4 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.9 - -
549
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 499 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 499 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 542 0 0 102 276 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 542
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 538
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 538
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
550
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.6
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 38 6 177 240 611 0 0 484 297
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1724 1872 611 781 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1091 1091 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 633 781 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 97 65 483 815 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 319 270 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 525 380 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 68 0 483 815 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 68 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 225 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 525 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 93.6 3.2 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 815 - 231 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.295 - 0.958 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3 - 93.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.2 - 8.5 - -
551
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 74.5
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Future Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 339 183 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 150.1 47.1 30.8 41.4

HCM LOS F E D E
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 249 365 491 319 172
LT Vol 0 19 256 319 0
Through Vol 201 0 187 0 172
RT Vol 48 346 48 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 265 388 522 339 183
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.668 0.866 1.232 0.875 0.446
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.927 8.702 8.489 9.976 9.453
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 366 419 428 367 384
Service Time 7.927 6.702 6.55 7.676 7.153
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.724 0.926 1.22 0.924 0.477
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 30.8 47.1 150.1 53.2 19.5
HCM Lane LOS D E F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.6 8.6 21.3 8.4 2.2
552
Section , Item D

HORIZON YEAR PLUS PROJECT
553
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.9
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 210 199
Future Vol, veh/h 0 152 181 0 210 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 17 18 3 13 7
Mvmt Flow 0 165 197 0 228 216
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 362 197
Stage 1 - - - - 197 -
Stage 2 - - - - 165 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.53 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.617 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 616 832
Stage 1 0 - - 0 811 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 838 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 616 832
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 616 -
Stage 1 - - - - 811 -
Stage 2 - - - - 838 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 616 832
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.371 0.26
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.2 10.8
HCM Lane LOS - - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1.7 1
+ + r
554
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 299 0 0 184 128 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 68 299 0 0 184 128 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 15 13 3 3 15 12 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 74 325 0 0 200 139 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 200 0 - - - 0 - 325
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.25 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.335 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - 0 0 - 0 0 714
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - - - - - 714
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.5 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1298 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.057 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.2 - -
555
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 853 28 41 967
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1437 427 0 0 881 0
Stage 1 853 - - - - -
Stage 2 584 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 86 478 - - 715 -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 423 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 80 478 - - 715 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 80 - - - - -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 392 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 76.1 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 715 - 129 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - 0.666 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - 76.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 3.6 - -
556
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 800 1 4 1126 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 1 6 0 0 4 800 1 4 1126 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 3 42 3 3 3 33 8 3 33 12 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 1 7 0 0 4 870 1 4 1224 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1676 2112 613 1499 2112 436 1225 0 0 871 0 0 Stage 1 1233 1233 - 879 879 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 443 879 - 620 1233 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 8.34 6.56 7.74 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.76 - - 4.76 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7.34 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 4.03 3.72 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.53 - - 2.53 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 41 50 350 84 50 565 420 - - 601 - -
Stage 1 135 245 - 307 361 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 469 361 - 440 245 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 41 49 350 83 49 565 420 - - 601 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 41 49 - 83 49 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 243 - 304 357 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 465 357 - 436 243 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 55.8 52 0.1 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 420 - - 73 83 601 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.03 0.079 0.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.7 - - 55.8 52 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
557
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 793 23 46 1116
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1496 423 1116 0 0 831 0
Stage 1 820 - - - - - -
Stage 2 676 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 103 577 277 - - 791 -
Stage 1 369 - - - - - -
Stage 2 441 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 569 277 - - 780 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 32.8 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 277 - - 193 780 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.337 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 32.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
558
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 48 89 13 83 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 25 12 48 7 18 48 89 13 83 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 42 27 13 52 8 20 52 97 14 90 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 290 308 91 294 260 101 91 0 0 149 0 0 Stage 1 119 119 - 141 141 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 171 189 - 153 119 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 660 604 964 656 643 952 1498 - - 1426 - - Stage 1 883 795 - 860 778 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 829 742 - 847 795 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 601 589 964 591 627 952 1498 - - 1426 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 601 589 - 591 627 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 870 787 - 847 766 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 755 731 - 771 787 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 10.8 11.3 0.9 1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1498 - - 695 643 1426 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.1 0.113 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 10.8 11.3 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.4 0 - -
559
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 1 0 11 0 33 19 502 4 0 891 57
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 986 1488 251 1210 1464 474 948 0 0 506 0 0 Stage 1 540 540 - 920 920 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 446 948 - 290 544 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 7.9 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.8 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 201 122 746 94 126 426 714 - - 1048 - - Stage 1 491 517 - 211 346 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 559 335 - 575 515 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 180 117 746 91 121 426 714 - - 1048 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 180 117 - 91 121 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 473 498 - 203 346 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 516 335 - 553 496 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 36.1 24.9 0.6 0

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 1048 - - 117 224 714 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.009 0.195 0.027 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 36.1 24.9 10.2 0.2 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - E C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0.7 0.1 - -
4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
560
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 8 17 70 106 16
Future Vol, veh/h 3 8 17 70 106 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 33 4 3 50
Mvmt Flow 3 9 18 76 115 17
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 242 126 134 0 - 0
Stage 1 126 - - - - -
Stage 2 116 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.497 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 744 922 1280 - - -
Stage 1 897 - - - - -
Stage 2 906 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 730 920 1278 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 730 - - - - -
Stage 1 882 - - - - -
Stage 2 904 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.3 1.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1278 - 859 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - 0.014 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0 - -
561
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 670 175 284 0 0 1051 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 0 670 175 284 0 0 1051 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 9 4 10 3 3 15 10
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 45 0 705 184 299 0 0 1106 42
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1220 - - 1148 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 667 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 553 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 - - 4.18 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 - - 2.24 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 171 0 0 593 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 469 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 537 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 0 - 593 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 324 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 537 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 53.3 5.3 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 593 - 118 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.311 - 0.384 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 53.3 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 1.6 - - -
562
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 55 185 31 62 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 55 185 31 62 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 11 13 5 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 59 199 33 67 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 199 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 199 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.527 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 787 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 832 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 787 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 787 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 832 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 10

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 787 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
563
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 739.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61
Future Vol, veh/h 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 24 10 3 3 3 3 8 22 12 23 3
Mvmt Flow 122 27 91 0 0 0 6 367 14 870 238 65
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2207 2390 152 303 0 0 367 0 0
Stage 1 2011 2011 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 196 379 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 7.1 4.16 - - 4.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 5.98 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 4.24 3.4 2.23 - - 2.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 35 ~ 25 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Stage 1 ~ 83 79 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 561 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 8 0 842 1248 - - 1119 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 8 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 ~ 83 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 178 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 5475.3 0.1 13.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1248 - - 8 842 1119 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 18.617 0.109 0.778 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 - -$ 8832.7 9.8 18.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 20.4 0.4 8.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
564
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 0 0 109 1 159
Future Vol, veh/h 190 0 0 109 1 159
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 3 3 3 7
Mvmt Flow 207 0 0 118 1 173
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 325 207
Stage 1 - - - - 207 -
Stage 2 - - - - 118 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.27
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.363
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 667 821
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 825 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 905 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 667 821
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 667 -
Stage 1 - - - - 825 -
Stage 2 - - - - 905 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 826 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.211 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 - -
565
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 351 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 351 0 0 111 415 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 369 0 0 117 437 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 369
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 674
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 674
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
566
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 29
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 10 4 3 3 3 7 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 20 0 245 260 917 0 0 502 339
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2109 2278 917 841 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1437 1437 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 672 841 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.6 6.53 6.3 4.14 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.6 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.68 4.027 3.39 2.236 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 50 40 319 786 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 200 198 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 475 379 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 33 0 319 786 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 33 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 134 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 475 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 239 2.6 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 786 - 194 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.331 - 1.361 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 239 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.4 - 15.3 - -
567
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 145
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Future Vol, veh/h 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 3 3 4 6 9 3
Mvmt Flow 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 357 159 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 193.2 213.5 85 70.5

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 67% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 28% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 97% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 339 499 447 328 146
LT Vol 0 15 300 328 0
Through Vol 299 0 126 0 146
RT Vol 40 484 21 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 368 542 486 357 159
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.989 1.375 1.317 1.014 0.432
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.83 10.215 11.036 11.96 11.486 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 310 358 335 307 316
Service Time 9.83 8.215 9.036 9.66 9.186
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.187 1.514 1.451 1.163 0.503
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 85 213.5 193.2 91.8 22.6
HCM Lane LOS F F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.4 24.1 20.7 11 2.1
568
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
1: American Ave & SR 99 SB Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 114 51
Future Vol, veh/h 0 367 97 0 114 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 225
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 5 11 3 11 3
Mvmt Flow 0 399 105 0 124 55
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 504 105
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 399 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.51 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.599 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 512 947
Stage 1 0 - - 0 897 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 659 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 512 947
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 512 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 659 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 512 947
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.242 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 14.3 9
HCM Lane LOS - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.9 0.2
+ + r
569
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
2: American Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 308 0 0 97 240 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 172 308 0 0 97 240 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 6 3 3 10 6 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 187 335 0 0 105 261 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 105 0 - - - 0 - 335
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.17 - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.263 - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - 0 0 - 0 0 705
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1456 - - - - - - 705
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) - 1456 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0.4 - -
570
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 21.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1225 12 22 898
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1736 613 0 0 1237 0
Stage 1 1225 - - - - -
Stage 2 511 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 78 409 - - 427 -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 564 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 73 409 - - 427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 73 - - - - -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 526 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 311.8 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 427 - 111 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.439 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.9 -$ 311.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 11.4 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 571
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Clovis Ave & Jefferson Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1149 0 3 913 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1149 0 3 913 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 93 92 92 96 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 50 7 3
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1235 0 3 951 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1583 2200 476 1725 2200 618 951 0 0 1235 0 0 Stage 1 957 957 - 1243 1243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 626 1243 - 482 957 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 7.56 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 5.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 6.56 5.56 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.7 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 72 44 532 56 44 430 712 - - 355 - -
Stage 1 275 332 - 183 243 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 436 243 - 532 332 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 71 43 532 55 43 430 712 - - 355 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 71 43 - 55 43 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 273 329 - 182 242 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 432 242 - 528 329 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 56.5 13.4 0 0.1

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 712 - - 71 430 355 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.015 0.003 0.009 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - - 56.5 13.4 15.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
4* 4* *1+1* *1+1*
572
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1209 39 62 906
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1839 639 906 0 0 1263 0
Stage 1 1244 - - - - - -
Stage 2 595 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 416 379 - - 541 -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 52 410 379 - - 533 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 52 - - - - - -
Stage 1 215 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 94.3 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 379 - - 92 533 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.624 0.116 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 94.3 12.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 3 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
573
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Fowler Ave & Lincoln Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 109 3 4 81 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 21 4 43 7 9 109 3 4 81 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 80 23 4 47 8 10 118 3 4 88 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 265 239 90 289 239 120 91 0 0 121 0 0 Stage 1 98 98 - 140 140 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 167 141 - 149 99 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 686 660 965 661 660 929 1498 - - 1460 - - Stage 1 906 812 - 861 779 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 833 778 - 851 811 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 638 653 965 580 653 929 1498 - - 1460 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 638 653 - 580 653 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 900 810 - 855 774 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 771 773 - 746 809 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 11 10.9 0.6 0.3

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1498 - - 703 673 1460 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.147 0.087 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 11 10.9 7.5 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - -
574
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 22.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 125 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 53 0 172 35 1339 0 2 654 20
Major/Minor Minor1 Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1740 2087 670 1410 2077 337 674 0 0 1339 0 0 Stage 1 1409 1409 - 668 668 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 331 678 - 742 1409 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.56 6.56 6.96 8.5 6.56 6.96 4.16 - - 4.16 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.56 5.56 - 7.5 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 4.03 3.33 4 4.03 3.33 2.23 - - 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 55 52 397 64 52 656 906 - - 506 - -
Stage 1 144 202 - 317 452 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 447 - 282 202 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 36 44 397 ~ 52 44 656 906 - - 506 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 36 44 - ~ 52 44 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 122 171 - 269 449 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 479 444 - 233 171 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 95.6 216.5 0.9 0

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT NWR EBLn1WBLn1 SEL SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 506 - - 44 175 906 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.099 1.286 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 0 - 95.6 216.5 9.1 0.7 - HCM Lane LOS B A - F F A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0.3 12.8 0.1 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 4» 4> 4+ f 4T>
575
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fowler Ave & Clayton Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 14 8 70 106 3
Future Vol, veh/h 17 14 8 70 106 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 6 4 50
Mvmt Flow 18 15 9 76 115 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 217 119 120 0 - 0
Stage 1 119 - - - - -
Stage 2 98 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 4.13 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 2.227 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 769 930 1462 - - -
Stage 1 904 - - - - -
Stage 2 923 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 761 928 1459 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 761 - - - - -
Stage 1 897 - - - - -
Stage 2 921 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.5 0.8 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1459 - 828 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.041 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 9.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
576
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Clovis Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp/SR 99 NB Off Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 303 0 0 944 107
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 0 851 101 303 0 0 944 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - Free - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 0 - 0 225 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 20 3 9 3 9 3 3 9 15
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 37 0 877 104 312 0 0 973 110
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1007 - - 1083 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 520 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 487 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.2 - - 4.16 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.7 - - 2.23 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 208 0 0 634 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 513 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 535 0 0 - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 174 0 - 634 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 174 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 429 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 535 0 - - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 31.2 2.9 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 634 - 174 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 - 0.213 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.8 - 31.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - D A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 - 0.8 - - -
577
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
10: Clayton Ave & SR 99 Sb Off Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 92 303 21 49 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 92 303 21 49 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length - 0 - 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 4 21 12 3
Mvmt Flow 0 100 329 23 53 0
Major/Minor Major1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 0 - 329 -
Stage 1 - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 329 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.608 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 645 0
Stage 1 - 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 707 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 645 0
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 645 0
Stage 1 - - - 0
Stage 2 - - 707 0
Approach SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 11.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 645 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.3 -
578
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 303.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Future Vol, veh/h 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Yield - - None - - Yield - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 75 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 7 20 8 4 13
Mvmt Flow 118 39 275 0 0 0 3 325 16 738 279 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1949 2111 165 329 0 0 325 0 0
Stage 1 1780 1780 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 169 331 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 6.56 7.02 4.16 - - 4.26 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.92 5.56 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 4.03 3.36 2.23 - - 2.28 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 54 50 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Stage 1 ~ 115 132 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 832 641 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 20 0 838 1220 - - 1189 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 20 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 ~ 115 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 315 0 - - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v$ 1273.3 0.1 8.9

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1220 - - 20 838 1189 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 7.88 0.328 0.621 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8 - -$ 3475.2 11.4 12.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 20.1 1.4 4.5 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon f'h
579
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
12: SR 99 SB Off Ramp & Adams Ave 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 188 0 0 105 4 308
Future Vol, veh/h 188 0 0 105 4 308
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - Yield
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 3 3 7 3 3
Mvmt Flow 204 0 0 114 4 335
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 318 204
Stage 1 - - - - 204 -
Stage 2 - - - - 114 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 673 834
Stage 1 - 0 0 - 828 -
Stage 2 - 0 0 - 908 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 673 834
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 673 -
Stage 1 - - - - 828 -
Stage 2 - - - - 908 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 12.1

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 845 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.401 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 2 - -
580
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
13: Adams Ave & SR 99 NB On Ramp 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 512 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 512 0 0 94 254 0 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - -
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 557 0 0 102 276 0 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - - - 0 - 557
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 0 - - 0 528
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Stage 2 0 - 0 0 - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - 528
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - - -
581
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/01/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 14
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.4
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 50 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 4 20 8 7 3 3 3 3 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 38 6 183 240 611 0 0 519 297
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1759 1907 611 816 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1091 1091 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 668 816 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.7 6.28 4.17 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.44 5.7 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.18 3.372 2.263 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 92 62 483 790 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 319 270 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 506 366 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 64 0 483 790 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 64 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 222 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 506 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 107.6 3.3 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 790 - 226 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.304 - 1.007 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 - 107.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.3 - 9.3 - -
582
Section , Item D
HCM 6th AWSC
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/01/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 83.3
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Future Vol, veh/h 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 376 183 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 162.2 51 32.4 56

HCM LOS F F D F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 52% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 81% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 19% 95% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 249 365 491 353 172
LT Vol 0 19 256 353 0
Through Vol 201 0 187 0 172
RT Vol 48 346 48 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 265 388 522 376 183
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.681 0.884 1.261 0.974 0.449
Departure Headway (Hd) 10.206 8.96 8.69 10.093 9.571
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 358 408 418 361 379
Service Time 8.206 6.96 6.756 7.793 7.271
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.74 0.951 1.249 1.042 0.483
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 32.4 51 162.2 73.7 19.8
HCM Lane LOS D F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.8 9 22.2 10.8 2.2
583
Section , Item D

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT RESULTS
584
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 746 26 38 884
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 811 28 41 961
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1392 406 0 0 839 0
Stage 1 811 - - - - -
Stage 2 581 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 93 495 - - 742 -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 424 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 86 495 - - 742 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 86 - - - - -
Stage 1 310 - - - - -
Stage 2 394 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 53.9 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 742 - 86 495 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - 0.543 0.079 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 - 88.3 12.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 2.4 0.3 - -
585
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 11.8
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1121 11 20 793
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1218 12 22 862
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1711 609 0 0 1230 0
Stage 1 1218 - - - - -
Stage 2 493 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 81 412 - - 430 -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 576 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 76 412 - - 430 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 76 - - - - -
Stage 1 241 - - - - -
Stage 2 537 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v166.7 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 430 - 76 412 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.23 0.161 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 - 274.1 15.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 7.1 0.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 586
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Future Vol, veh/h 43 36 785 26 38 890
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 42 42 13 13 10 10
Mvmt Flow 47 39 853 28 41 967
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1437 427 0 0 881 0
Stage 1 853 - - - - -
Stage 2 584 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.64 7.74 - - 4.3 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.64 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3.72 - - 2.3 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 86 478 - - 715 -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 423 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 80 478 - - 715 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 80 - - - - -
Stage 1 292 - - - - -
Stage 2 392 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v 60.4 0 0.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 715 - 80 478 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - 0.584 0.082 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.3 - 99.9 13.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 2.6 0.3 - -
587
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Golden St. Blvd. & Jefferson Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.6
Movement EBL EBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Future Vol, veh/h 86 61 1127 11 20 826
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 150 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 13 6 20 30 5
Mvmt Flow 93 66 1225 12 22 898
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1736 613 0 0 1237 0
Stage 1 1225 - - - - -
Stage 2 511 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.86 7.16 - - 4.7 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.86 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.53 3.43 - - 2.5 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 78 409 - - 427 -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 564 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 73 409 - - 427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 73 - - - - -
Stage 1 239 - - - - -
Stage 2 526 - - - - -
Approach EB SE NW
HCM Control Delay, s/v180.4 0 0.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWL NWT EBLn1 EBLn2 SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 427 - 73 409 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 1.281 0.162 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.9 - 297.4 15.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.2 - 7.3 0.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 588
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 767 22 45 1070
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 791 23 46 1103
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1488 422 1103 0 0 829 0
Stage 1 818 - - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 104 577 283 - - 792 -
Stage 1 370 - - - - - -
Stage 2 444 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 569 283 - - 781 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 94 - - - - - -
Stage 1 365 - - - - - -
Stage 2 408 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 28.8 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 283 - - 94 569 781 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.263 0.071 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 56.5 11.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1 0.2 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
589
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1125 37 58 850
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1197 39 62 904
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1826 633 904 0 0 1251 0
Stage 1 1232 - - - - - -
Stage 2 594 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 62 420 380 - - 547 -
Stage 1 221 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 53 414 380 - - 539 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 53 - - - - - -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 74.5 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 380 - - 53 414 539 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.542 0.069 0.114 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 134.7 14.3 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.1 0.2 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
590
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Future Vol, veh/h 24 39 0 769 22 45 1083
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 26 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 12 3 3 8 6 3 12
Mvmt Flow 25 40 0 793 23 46 1116
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1496 423 1116 0 0 831 0
Stage 1 820 - - - - - -
Stage 2 676 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.04 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.04 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.04 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.62 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 103 577 277 - - 791 -
Stage 1 369 - - - - - -
Stage 2 441 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 569 277 - - 780 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - - -
Stage 2 405 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 29.1 0 0.4

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 277 - - 93 569 780 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.266 0.071 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 57.2 11.8 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 1 0.2 0.2 -
fl ft* ft
591
Section , Item D
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Clovis Ave & Lincoln Ave 07/27/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Future Vol, veh/h 27 27 0 1136 37 58 852
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 0 0 15 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - 100 75 - - 150 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 92 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 11 3 3 8 12 3 7
Mvmt Flow 29 29 0 1209 39 62 906
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1839 639 906 0 0 1263 0
Stage 1 1244 - - - - - -
Stage 2 595 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.02 6.96 6.46 - - 4.16 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.02 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.02 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.61 3.33 2.53 - - 2.23 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 61 416 379 - - 541 -
Stage 1 218 - - - - - -
Stage 2 490 - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 52 410 379 - - 533 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 52 - - - - - -
Stage 1 215 - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 - - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 76.7 0 0.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 379 - - 52 410 533 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.552 0.07 0.116 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 0 - - 138.9 14.4 12.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 2.1 0.2 0.4 -
fl ft* ft
592
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1 0 10 0 31 18 472 4 0 838 54
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1159 1856 1159 1856 1707 1856 1856 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1 0 11 0 33 19 502 4 0 891 57
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 50 3 50 3 13 3 3 7 3
Cap, veh/h 0 101 0 398 0 54 191 1667 853 0 1766 113
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1856 0 1392 0 982 35 3074 1572 0 3347 208 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1 0 11 0 33 276 245 4 0 467 481
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1392 0 982 1633 1476 1572 0 1706 1759 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 0.12
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 101 0 398 0 54 1058 800 853 0 925 954 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.62 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1870 0 1738 0 990 4147 3868 4121 0 4472 4609 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 10.3 2.8 2.8 2.3 0.0 3.2 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 21.3 2.9 3.0 2.3 0.0 3.6 3.6 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1 44 525 948
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.0 18.5 3.0 3.6
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 5.7 16.6 5.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 58.5 22.5 58.5 22.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 2.0 4.0 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.3 0.0 3.1 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 3.8
HCM 6th LOS A
4+ f 4T>
593
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 4 0 49 0 158 32 1232 0 2 602 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1159 1856 1856 1856 1811 1856 1856 1767 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 4 0 53 0 172 35 1339 0 2 654 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 50 3 3 3 6 3 3 9 3
Cap, veh/h 0 290 0 399 0 246 118 2022 967 93 1999 61
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1856 0 1385 0 1572 36 3289 1572 1 3251 99 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 4 0 53 0 172 730 644 0 355 0 321 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1385 0 1572 1759 1566 1572 1762 0 1590 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 4.1 10.2 10.6 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.01 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 290 0 399 0 246 1178 963 967 1175 0 977 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.70 0.62 0.67 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 921 0 876 0 780 2786 2450 2460 2820 0 2488 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 15.7 4.9 5.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 19.3 5.4 5.8 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.8 LnGrp LOS B B B A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 4 225 1374 676
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.0 18.2 5.6 3.8
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.7 10.6 28.7 10.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.5 19.5 61.5 19.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 2.1 12.6 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.0 0.0 11.6 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 6.3
HCM 6th LOS A
4+ f 4T>
594
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 37 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 810 224 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1544 1752 1856 1781 1574 1722 1559 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 35 0 6 367 0 862 238 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 24 10 3 8 22 12 23 3
Cap, veh/h 115 104 14 670 1192 1305 349
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1544 1485 1767 3474 0 3182 2312 618 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 35 0 6 367 0 862 151 152
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1544 1485 1767 1692 0 1591 1481 1448 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 8.7 1.8 1.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.0 8.7 1.8 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.43
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 115 104 14 670 1192 836 817
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.33 0.42 0.55 0.72 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 837 762 259 1850 3181 2073 2026
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.6 16.7 0.0 18.5 13.5 0.0 10.1 4.0 4.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 1.9 0.0 18.4 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.0 18.5 0.0 37.0 14.2 0.0 10.9 4.1 4.1 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 68 373 1165
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 14.6 9.1
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 11.9 7.0 4.8 25.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.5 20.5 18.5 5.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 5.7 2.8 2.1 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.3 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
595
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 97 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 634 257 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1856 1811 1856 1796 1604 1781 1841 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 72 85 0 3 325 0 689 279 50
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 3 6 3 7 20 8 4 13
Cap, veh/h 193 208 7 647 1024 1474 261
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.31 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1856 1535 1767 3503 0 3291 2970 525 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 85 0 3 325 0 689 163 166
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1856 1535 1767 1706 0 1646 1749 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 6.4 1.8 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 6.4 1.8 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 193 208 7 647 1024 868 867
V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.41 0.41 0.50 0.67 0.19 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1064 1145 279 2203 3069 2484 2480 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.3 14.4 0.0 17.3 12.6 0.0 10.5 4.9 4.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 1.3 0.0 33.5 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.5 15.7 0.0 50.8 13.3 0.0 11.2 5.0 5.0 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 157 328 1018
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.6 13.6 9.2
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 11.1 8.4 4.6 21.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.5 22.5 21.5 5.5 49.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 5.0 3.5 2.1 3.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.5 1.6 0.5 0.0 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
596
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 115 25 86 0 0 0 6 345 13 818 224 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1544 1752 1856 1781 1574 1722 1559 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 141 0 0 6 367 0 870 238 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 24 10 3 8 22 12 23 3
Cap, veh/h 336 0 14 654 1179 1284 343
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.37 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 3393 0 1485 1767 3474 0 3182 2312 618
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 141 0 0 6 367 0 870 151 152
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 0 1485 1767 1692 0 1591 1481 1448 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.5 2.0 2.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 9.5 2.0 2.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.43
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 336 0 14 654 1179 823 804
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.56 0.74 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1569 0 243 1819 2903 1944 1900
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.9 0.0 0.0 19.7 14.6 0.0 10.9 4.4 4.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 0.0 38.3 15.4 0.0 11.8 4.5 4.5 LnGrp LOS B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 141 373 1173
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 15.7 9.9
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.3 12.2 8.5 4.8 26.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.5 21.5 18.5 5.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 5.9 3.6 2.1 4.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 1.8 0.4 0.0 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
597
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 36 253 0 0 0 3 299 15 679 257 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1856 1811 1856 1796 1604 1781 1841 1707 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 79 94 0 3 325 0 738 279 50
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 3 6 3 7 20 8 4 13
Cap, veh/h 197 212 7 633 1072 1505 266
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.33 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 1856 1535 1767 3503 0 3291 2970 525 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 79 94 0 3 325 0 738 163 166
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1856 1535 1767 1706 0 1646 1749 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0 7.0 1.8 1.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0 7.0 1.8 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 197 212 7 633 1072 886 885
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.44 0.41 0.51 0.69 0.18 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 1107 270 2037 3061 2403 2399 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.8 14.9 0.0 17.9 13.2 0.0 10.6 4.8 4.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 1.5 0.0 33.5 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.1 16.3 0.0 51.4 13.9 0.0 11.4 4.9 4.9 LnGrp LOS B B D B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 173 328 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.2 14.2 9.4
Approach LOS B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 11.2 8.6 4.6 22.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.5 21.5 21.5 5.5 49.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 5.1 3.7 2.1 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.7 1.6 0.6 0.0 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 'i’i +1*
598
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 322 146 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1752 1856 1752 1856 1856 0 1856 1841 1811 1767 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 350 159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 0 3 4 6 9 0
Cap, veh/h 356 637 107 292 0 640 0 355 47 381 853 0
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.44 0.44 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1462 245 1217 0 1572 0 1605 212 1725 1767 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 0 160 16 0 526 0 0 368 350 159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1711 0 1708 1217 0 1572 0 0 1817 1725 1767 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.5 0.0 6.4 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.5 0.0 6.4 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 0 743 292 0 640 0 0 402 381 853 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.19 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 412 0 799 292 0 640 0 0 438 447 955 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.6 0.0 19.4 36.9 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 41.9 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 22.9 21.9 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.9 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 12.0 11.5 2.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 65.6 0.0 19.5 37.0 0.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 64.8 63.8 16.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E B D D E E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 486 542 368 509
Approach Delay, s/veh 50.4 37.4 64.8 49.0
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 25.0 28.8 28.8 52.4 57.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 28.5 26.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.5 22.5 23.8 23.8 8.4 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.1
HCM 6th LOS D
4 i*
599
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 319 172 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1841 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 339 183 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 319 629 161 318 0 666 0 257 61 388 837 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.44 0.44 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1425 365 1121 0 1560 0 1448 345 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 272 0 250 20 0 368 0 0 265 339 183 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1790 1121 0 1560 0 0 1793 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.5 0.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 11.9 15.5 5.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.5 0.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 11.9 15.5 5.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.19 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 319 0 790 318 0 666 0 0 319 388 837 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.87 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 560 0 1102 361 0 725 0 0 504 665 1319 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.2 0.0 15.2 26.8 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 31.5 14.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 6.6 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 5.5 7.1 2.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 39.7 0.0 15.4 26.8 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.0 39.8 38.1 14.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B C B D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 522 388 265 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 19.2 39.8 29.7
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.6 21.8 22.9 19.4 41.4 42.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 31.5 23.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.5 16.8 17.5 13.9 9.6 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 28.4
HCM 6th LOS C
4 i*
600
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 300 126 21 15 0 484 0 299 40 328 146 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1752 1856 1752 1856 1856 0 1856 1841 1811 1767 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 326 137 23 16 0 526 0 325 43 357 159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 10 3 10 3 3 0 3 4 6 9 0
Cap, veh/h 356 633 106 290 0 644 0 354 47 387 858 0
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.43 0.43 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.49 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1462 245 1217 0 1572 0 1605 212 1725 1767 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 326 0 160 16 0 526 0 0 368 357 159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1711 0 1708 1217 0 1572 0 0 1817 1725 1767 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.7 0.0 6.5 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 22.0 22.5 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.7 0.0 6.5 1.2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 22.0 22.5 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 0 740 290 0 644 0 0 401 387 858 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.22 0.06 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.19 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 409 0 793 290 0 644 0 0 434 443 947 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.0 0.0 19.7 37.4 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 42.3 42.1 16.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 23.4 23.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.0 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 12.2 11.9 2.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 66.4 0.0 19.8 37.4 0.0 37.2 0.0 0.0 65.7 65.1 16.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS E B D D E E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 486 542 368 516
Approach Delay, s/veh 51.0 37.2 65.7 50.1
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.6 25.0 29.4 29.0 52.6 58.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 20.5 28.5 26.5 51.5 59.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.7 22.5 24.5 24.0 8.5 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.7
HCM 6th LOS D
4 i*
601
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 256 187 48 19 0 346 0 201 48 353 172 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1841 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 272 199 51 20 0 368 0 214 51 376 183 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 316 614 157 308 0 688 0 254 60 423 865 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.47 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1425 365 1121 0 1560 0 1448 345 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 272 0 250 20 0 368 0 0 265 376 183 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1790 1121 0 1560 0 0 1793 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.1 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 18.0 5.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.1 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 18.0 5.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.19 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 0 772 308 0 688 0 0 314 423 865 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.32 0.07 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.89 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 514 0 1031 344 0 738 0 0 460 675 1280 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.0 0.0 16.5 28.5 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 35.0 32.2 13.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 9.1 8.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 0.0 3.2 0.3 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.5 2.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.2 0.0 16.7 28.6 0.0 18.6 0.0 0.0 44.1 41.0 14.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B C B D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 522 388 265 559
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.5 19.1 44.1 32.1
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 22.1 25.5 19.9 42.3 45.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 20.5 33.5 22.5 50.5 60.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.1 17.1 20.0 14.5 10.1 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.8 1.6 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 30.6
HCM 6th LOS C
4 i*
602
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 186 239 844 0 0 456 312 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1604 1856 1752 1841 1856 0 0 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 0 202 260 917 0 0 496 339
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 20 3 10 4 3 0 0 7 3
Cap, veh/h 27 0 273 328 1181 0 0 651 570
Arrive On Green 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 143 0 1445 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 0 260 917 0 0 496 339
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1588 0 0 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.3 18.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 9.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.3 18.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 9.0 Prop In Lane 0.09 0.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 0 328 1181 0 0 651 570
V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 600 0 0 730 2211 0 0 1236 1082
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.7 0.0 0.0 20.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 14.5 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.9 3.8 0.0 0.0 4.3 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.3 0.0 0.0 24.4 7.9 0.0 0.0 16.4 14.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 1177 835
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.3 11.5 15.5
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 37.4 14.1 23.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 61.5 21.5 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 20.3 9.3 14.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 8.3 0.6 4.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.2
HCM 6th LOS B
603
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 166 226 574 0 0 455 279 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1604 1781 1796 1856 0 0 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 6 177 240 611 0 0 484 297
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 20 8 7 3 0 0 3 4
Cap, veh/h 49 8 230 305 1141 0 0 645 542
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 239 38 1114 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 221 0 0 240 611 0 0 484 297
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1391 0 0 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 11.6 7.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 11.6 7.7 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.80 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 288 0 0 305 1141 0 0 645 542
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 524 0 0 746 2279 0 0 1305 1097
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.9 0.0 0.0 19.8 5.6 0.0 0.0 14.5 13.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.2 0.0 0.0 24.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 14.1 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 221 851 781
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.2 11.2 15.5
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.9 35.5 13.5 22.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 62.0 22.0 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 11.5 8.8 13.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.4 0.5 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B
604
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 225 239 844 0 0 462 312 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1604 1856 1752 1841 1856 0 0 1796 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 0 245 260 917 0 0 502 339
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 20 3 10 4 3 0 0 7 3
Cap, veh/h 26 0 314 323 1158 0 0 645 565
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.18 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 120 0 1466 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 265 0 0 260 917 0 0 502 339
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1586 0 0 1753 1856 0 0 1796 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 20.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 9.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 20.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 9.8 Prop In Lane 0.08 0.92 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 0 0 323 1158 0 0 645 565
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 585 0 0 646 2019 0 0 1147 1004
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.6 0.0 0.0 21.7 7.8 0.0 0.0 15.9 14.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.9 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 0.0 26.4 9.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 15.6 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 265 1177 841
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 12.9 17.0
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.4 39.2 14.7 24.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 60.5 20.5 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 22.4 9.9 15.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 8.2 0.5 4.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.7
HCM 6th LOS B
605
Section , Item D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 36 6 172 226 574 0 0 488 279 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1604 1781 1796 1856 0 0 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 6 183 240 611 0 0 519 297
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 20 8 7 3 0 0 3 4
Cap, veh/h 49 8 234 301 1156 0 0 673 566
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 233 37 1121 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 0 0 240 611 0 0 519 297
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1390 0 0 1711 1856 0 0 1856 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.2 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.2 8.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.81 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 290 0 0 301 1156 0 0 673 566
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 507 0 0 656 2134 0 0 1266 1065
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 15.1 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.8 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 0.0 25.9 6.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 14.2 LnGrp LOS C C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 227 851 816
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 11.6 16.0
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 37.8 13.9 23.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 61.5 20.5 36.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 11.9 9.2 15.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.3 0.5 4.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B
606
Section , Item D

INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Site: 101 [HY Plus Project AM (Site Folder: General)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.4.221 Clovis Ave-SR 99 SB Ramps
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Intersection Performance - Hourly Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Travel Speed (Average) km/h 49.7 49.7 km/h
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/h 1950.2 2340.2 pers-km/h Travel Time (Total) veh-h/h 39.2 47.1 pers-h/h
Desired Speed km/h 65.0
Speed Efficiency 0.76
Travel Time Index 7.39
Congestion Coefficient 1.31
Demand Flows (Total) veh/h 1840 2208 pers/h
Arrival Flows (Total) veh/h 1840
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) % 3.0
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Arrivals) % 3.0
Degree of Saturation 0.648
Practical Spare Capacity % 31.1
Effective Intersection Capacity veh/h 2839
Control Delay (Total) veh-h/h 4.41 5.30 pers-h/h
Control Delay (Average) sec 8.6 8.6 sec
Control Delay (Worst Lane by MC) sec 14.7
Control Delay (Worst Movement by MC) sec 37.9 37.9 sec
Geometric Delay (Average) sec 0.0
Stop-Line Delay (Average) sec 8.6
Idling Time (Average) sec 6.5
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) LOS A
95% Back of Queue - Veh (Worst Lane) veh 6.4
95% Back of Queue - Dist (Worst Lane) m 49.7
Ave. Que Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) 0.04
Effective Stops (Total) veh/h 514 617 pers/h
Effective Stop Rate 0.28 0.28
Proportion Queued 0.31 0.31
Performance Index 50.5 50.5
Cost (Total) $/h 986.42 986.42 $/h
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/h 192.4
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/h 455.4
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/h 0.040
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/h 0.56
NOx (Total) kg/h 0.699
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements.

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand effects.

In Network analysis, Arrival Flows will be reduced if Upstream Capacity Constraint exists.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Site: 101 [HY Plus Project PM (Site Folder: General)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.4.221 Clovis Ave-SR 99 SB Ramps
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Intersection Performance - Hourly Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Travel Speed (Average) km/h 49.9 49.9 km/h
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/h 1945.7 2334.8 pers-km/h Travel Time (Total) veh-h/h 39.0 46.8 pers-h/h
Desired Speed km/h 65.0
Speed Efficiency 0.77
Travel Time Index 7.42
Congestion Coefficient 1.30
Demand Flows (Total) veh/h 1845 2213 pers/h
Arrival Flows (Total) veh/h 1845
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) % 3.0
Percent Heavy Vehicles (Arrivals) % 3.0
Degree of Saturation 0.588
Practical Spare Capacity % 44.6
Effective Intersection Capacity veh/h 3138
Control Delay (Total) veh-h/h 4.53 5.43 pers-h/h
Control Delay (Average) sec 8.8 8.8 sec
Control Delay (Worst Lane by MC) sec 18.6
Control Delay (Worst Movement by MC) sec 44.6 44.6 sec
Geometric Delay (Average) sec 0.0
Stop-Line Delay (Average) sec 8.8
Idling Time (Average) sec 6.4
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) LOS A
95% Back of Queue - Veh (Worst Lane) veh 4.0
95% Back of Queue - Dist (Worst Lane) m 31.4
Ave. Que Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) 0.03
Effective Stops (Total) veh/h 614 736 pers/h
Effective Stop Rate 0.33 0.33
Proportion Queued 0.33 0.33
Performance Index 51.7 51.7
Cost (Total) $/h 979.77 979.77 $/h
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/h 190.9
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/h 451.9
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/h 0.040
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/h 0.56
NOx (Total) kg/h 0.695
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements.

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand effects.

In Network analysis, Arrival Flows will be reduced if Upstream Capacity Constraint exists.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

Site Model Variability Index (Average value of largest changes in Lane Degrees of Saturation from the third to the last Main (TimingCapacity) Iterations): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 3 (Maximum: 10)
Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance - Annual Values
Performance Measure Vehicles: All MCs Persons
Demand Flows (Total) veh/y 885,391 1,062,470 pers/y
Delay (Total) veh-h/y 2,173 2,608 pers-h/y
609
Section , Item D
Effective Stops (Total) veh/y 294,596 353,515 pers/y
Travel Distance (Total) veh-km/y 933,921 1,120,705 pers-km/y Travel Time (Total) veh-h/y 18,718 22,461 pers-h/y
Cost (Total) $/y 470,292 470,292 $/y
Fuel Consumption (Total) L/y 91,624
Carbon Dioxide (Total) kg/y 216,927
Hydrocarbons (Total) kg/y 19
Carbon Monoxide (Total) kg/y 268
NOx (Total) kg/y 334
1 Hours per Year: 480 (Site)
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2023 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: VRPA TECHNOLOGIES | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 7:57:00 PM Project: C:\Users\jellard\Desktop\Shared Items on VRPA1\Project_NP\Clayton and Goldenstate Blvd Property Rezone\SIDRA\HY Plus Project.sip9
610
Section , Item D
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 34 91 6 381 862 303
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.16 0.28 0.02 0.48 0.68 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 26.5 26.9 5.5 28.5 21.5 16.9 3.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 26.5 26.9 5.5 28.5 21.5 16.9 3.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 10 0 2 54 112 9
Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 40 22 13 116 206 37
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 625 583 655 205 1446 2273 2707
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.03 0.26 0.38 0.11
Intersection Summary
611
Section , Item D
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 160 16 526 368 350 159
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.25 0.19 0.76 0.81 0.80 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 53.1 23.5 52.5 27.9 51.8 50.8 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.5
Total Delay (s/veh) 53.1 23.5 52.5 27.9 51.8 60.8 12.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 208 72 11 224 233 220 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) #354 123 33 364 #396 #367 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 364 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 456 901 237 733 494 495 1059
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 116 592
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.18 0.07 0.72 0.74 0.92 0.34
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
612
Section , Item D
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 260 917 496 339
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.61 0.70 0.73 0.41
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.3 30.3 9.0 24.3 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.3 30.3 9.6 24.3 3.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 81 128 141 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 80 203 360 323 48
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 636 655 1678 1106 1104
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 380 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.41 0.71 0.45 0.31
Intersection Summary
613
Section , Item D
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 73 275 3 341 689 329
v/c Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.56 0.01 0.46 0.64 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.8 22.7 8.5 27.0 20.7 18.2 4.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.8 22.7 8.5 27.0 20.7 18.2 4.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 18 0 1 42 81 12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 62 56 9 103 171 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 717 748 828 198 1547 2171 3077
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.33 0.02 0.22 0.32 0.11
Intersection Summary
614
Section , Item D
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 250 20 368 265 339 183
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.38 0.20 0.47 0.69 0.73 0.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 43.9 22.9 49.0 9.6 43.2 41.4 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1
Total Delay (s/veh) 43.9 22.9 49.0 9.6 43.2 42.0 12.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 137 94 10 46 129 169 49
Queue Length 95th (ft) 264 187 38 135 258 314 101
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 388 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 565 1126 278 929 521 672 1333
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 101 568
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.22 0.07 0.40 0.51 0.59 0.24
Intersection Summary
615
Section , Item D
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 240 611 484 297
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.70 0.38
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.6 29.4 5.6 23.1 3.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.6 29.4 5.9 23.1 3.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 72 66 132 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 85 188 176 310 46
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 651 670 1696 1184 1103
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 507 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.37 0.51 0.41 0.27
Intersection Summary
616
Section , Item D
Queues
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR SET SER NWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 11 33 521 4 948
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.20 0.00 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 16.9 9.7 2.2 0.5 2.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.0 16.9 9.7 2.2 0.5 2.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 2 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 13 17 41 1 78
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1099 3588 1938 3391
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 125
Base Capacity (vph) 1168 802 694 2945 1568 3351
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.18 0.00 0.28
Intersection Summary
617
Section , Item D
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 75 91 6 381 870 303
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.03 0.49 0.69 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 28.2 28.6 4.9 30.8 23.2 18.3 3.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 28.2 28.6 4.9 30.8 23.2 18.3 3.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 24 0 2 58 122 11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 74 21 14 126 227 41
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 602 582 635 197 1459 2141 2613
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.03 0.26 0.41 0.12
Intersection Summary
618
Section , Item D
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 160 16 526 368 357 159
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.26 0.20 0.76 0.81 0.80 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 53.5 23.6 52.6 27.7 52.2 51.3 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.5
Total Delay (s/veh) 53.5 23.6 52.6 27.7 52.2 63.6 12.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 208 72 11 224 233 226 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) #354 123 33 364 #396 #379 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 364 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 454 896 236 731 492 493 1054
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 115 592
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.18 0.07 0.72 0.75 0.94 0.34
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
619
Section , Item D
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 8:27 am 02/06/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 265 260 917 502 339
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.64 0.72 0.75 0.42
Control Delay (s/veh) 19.5 33.4 10.9 26.8 3.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 19.5 33.4 11.6 26.8 3.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 90 163 159 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 215 437 348 51
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 634 598 1620 1060 1073
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 9 373 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.44 0.74 0.47 0.32
Intersection Summary
620
Section , Item D
Queues
7: Golden St. Blvd. & Clayton Ave 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR SET NWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 53 172 1374 676
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.32 0.42 0.66 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 20.0 26.3 7.9 7.7 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 20.0 26.3 7.9 7.7 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 12 0 99 34
Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 49 45 206 74
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1099 3588 1938 1656
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150
Base Capacity (vph) 712 369 710 3098 3082
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.14 0.24 0.44 0.22
Intersection Summary
621
Section , Item D
Queues
11: Clovis Ave & Clayton Ave/SR 99 SB On Ramp 09/10/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 79 275 3 341 738 329
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.27 0.56 0.01 0.47 0.66 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 24.0 23.7 8.6 28.0 21.6 18.6 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.0 23.7 8.6 28.0 21.6 18.6 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 21 0 1 44 90 13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 68 57 9 106 186 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 733 1193 700
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 150
Base Capacity (vph) 697 725 813 193 1439 2178 3042
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.02 0.24 0.34 0.11
Intersection Summary
622
Section , Item D
Queues
14: Sumner Ave/ Merced St. & Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB Off Ramps 06/03/2024 Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 3
Lane Group SEL SET NWT NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 250 20 368 265 376 183
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.38 0.21 0.47 0.70 0.76 0.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.1 50.3 9.9 45.8 41.7 11.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2
Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.1 50.3 9.9 45.8 42.9 11.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 104 11 54 140 200 50
Queue Length 95th (ft) 267 190 38 140 #262 345 99
Internal Link Dist (ft) 506 439 388 240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 400 50
Base Capacity (vph) 523 1063 267 927 480 687 1308
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 141 608
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.24 0.07 0.40 0.55 0.69 0.26
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
623
Section , Item D
Queues
15: Merced St. & SR 99 NB Ramps 06/03/2024
Horizon Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Clayton and GoldenState Property Prezone 2:43 pm 02/29/2024 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Page 4
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 240 611 519 297
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.72 0.37
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.8 30.9 5.5 23.5 3.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.8 30.9 5.8 23.5 3.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 75 67 147 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 85 193 177 329 45
Internal Link Dist (ft) 684 240 772
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 250
Base Capacity (vph) 655 609 1679 1186 1104
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 6 521 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.40 0.53 0.44 0.27
Intersection Summary
624
Section , Item D
Appendix D – Detailed Collision Data
625
Section , Item D
= TIJUIC SWITRS GIS Map I 1V I SafeTREC, UC Berkeley @EN Map SWITRS Tools Options Layers Basemaps Print Help Q. 5 U Results
Selected Factors:

Date 01/01/2018-12/31/2022 County Fresno
City All
Result Summary:
15,470 oF 15,770 98.193) crashes mapped
185 crashes selected. Clear Selection
wy.tjAOiO
J
2 4>
£iVa!1bt Fowler
Easton
Fowler SuVvh Canal
E CIr FO
Olewider
I f Z
626
Section , Item D
S’c. zarc
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
Crash Severity Count %
Crashes
1 - Fata1 9 4.36%
2 - nj_ n/ ' 5e f- = 16
3 - njl ■Othe r 11 '.sibl e; 53 23.6 %
_ - - (Complaint of Pam 1Q 7 H7.Sui
: v
3 - Inj uFy :C'th er 4 - Inj u n/ (C □ mp lai nt
Visible) of Pain '
1 - Fate
Crash Seventy
♦ - Fata • 5 - Inury (Othe 1' VisiDe■ ® a - iniury i"Compia nt o f z - i'Seve-5. Pain <
627
Section , Item D
E
:- c _ rc
Number of Crashes by Type of Crash
Type of Crash Count %
-- . jt E’.czsc 0 G 0096
A- Head-On 6 3-24
£ - Sidesvy pe 12 649
C - Pear End 34
D - Broadside 42 Z2.7G9E
E - Hit 0b|ecr 23 15.14%
F - Overturned 4 2.16%
G - ■ 'ehicle Pedestrian 6 3-M«
H - Other 3 ■.62%
135 Crashes
10 c
5°
z CT
■ *>'
z
z
Type ofCrash
® - - - j l Stated L A - nead-Or
# E - Hit Object
® C-Rear B - Sides ±nc 1
,vise
D - Broadside
r--Other
- - Overturned G - verjc e/Pedestna'-
628
Section , Item D
Ei;.Day of Week and Time
Number of Crashes per Day of Week per Time
185Crashes
25-00 - Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
□
21:00-23:59 1 2 0 2 2 3 2
18:00-20:59 8 0 2 2 7 5 3 c ■5:00-17:59 7 5 n 6 9 4 1
12:00-14 50 5 3 4 5 3 5 3
09:00-' 1:59 1 5 1 2 2 4 2
10 06:00-08:59 7 3 12 4 4 4 0
03:00-05:59 O □ 0 3 3 2 0 1
00:00-02:59 3 1 1 3 0 4 2
1 - Monday 2 -Tuesday 3- Wednesday 4 -Thursday 5 -Friday 6 - Saturday 7- Sunday 629
Section , Item D
B\ Tta-y Crasri Factor (
c C-'l '
Number of Crashes by PCF Violation
Crashes
MM i \
PCF Violation
0 CC-U'knc-v. 1
0 Oc -
lTi- ip roper - assing
09 - Aina m i- ?■■=■Rig t c? a.
i - ~ -=F ■:Sigrz 1 =-r £ rrj
D 1 - _-
r
'' : r;c ;r ESz.r; -.c ._ "z=r ;i-= r- L = n Ce Z" - IC rr- ,-r Z'-jc 0 Oj - j -G= _
'e Sceed
0 £>S- rnproper Tumiric
' 1- - =zazz■a■ ■ D;at zn
0 G
- - _nsa-e _=- e ZFarige
i-Dtrc- -i-u-.t- jr Ze.ZErZZ' a - ;'
630
Section , Item D
Appendix E – Signal Warrant Worksheets
631
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Existing Plus Project AM XPM
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
SR 99 SB Ramps / Clovis Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 632
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Golden State Blvd / Jefferson Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

X XAM PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 634
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Clovis Ave / Lincoln Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAMXPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 635
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Golden State Blvd / Clayton Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
XAM
XPM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

X XPM AM XPM
XAM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 637
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Merced St / SR 99 SB Off Ramp-Fowler Ave
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
’Note: 150 vph appbes as I he lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane 638
Section , Item D
LEGEND
X Horizon Year Plus Project AM XPM
Merced St / SR 99 SB NB Ramps
X Horizon Year Without Project AM XPM
XAM
XPM
X AM
PM
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
600
SCO
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE I ANES
4CO
2 OR MORE LANES &1 LANE
300
ANE & 1 LANE
200
100
400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1SOO 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
HIGHER-VOLUME APPROACH ■VPH
S
8 MAJOR STREET— TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES—

640
Section , Item D
RESOLUTION NO. 2783

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER

REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF FRESNO COUNTY TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6471

REORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, the City of Fowler desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the CorteseKnox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the proposed change of reorganization; and WHEREAS, the specific changes of organization requested consists of annexation to the City of Fowler and the Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler County Sanitation District, and detachment from the Consolidated Irrigation District, Kings River Conservation District, and the Fresno County Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be changed is uninhabited, and contains fewer than twelve (12) registered voters, according to information received from the Fresno County Elections Officer; and
WHEREAS, a map of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference herein; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Fowler; and
WHEREAS, the reason for this proposed change of reorganization is to annex the land to accommodate additional industrial and residential growth in the City of Fowler, consistent with its General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed reorganization in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Fowler, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County is hereby requested to initiate proceedings for the (change of organization/reorganization) of territory as described in Exhibit A in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May 2025, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT: APPROVED:

ATTEST: ___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
641
Section , Item D
Exhibit A
642
Section , Item D

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: May 6, 2025
FROM: SOO HO PARK, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Actions pertaining to the Well 9 Drought Resiliency Project:
i. AWARD a construction contract to United Field Services Corporation in the amount of $3,356,725 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
ii. APPROVE a professional services agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. in the amount of $128,725 for construction management and observation services for the Project and authorize the City Manager to negotiate the agreement.
iii. AUTHORIZE a 5% project construction contingency budget of $167,836 to fund any identified environmental mitigation, testing, inspection, and unforeseen issues during
construction.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action awards a construction contract to United Field Services Corporation for the Well 9 Drought Resiliency Project (“Project”) in the amount of $3,356,725. This action also authorizes the City Manager to negotiate a professional services agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., to provide construction management and observation services relating to the Project for an amount not to exceed $128,725. Lastly, this action authorizes a 5% contingency budget in the amount of $167,836 to fund any identified environmental mitigation, testing, inspection, and unforeseen issues during construction.

BACKGROUND
A public bid opening for the Well 9 Drought Resiliency Project was held on February 20, 2025.

Unified Field Services Corporation was identified as the lowest apparent bidder, with a base bid plus additive alternates total of $3,356,725, which exceeded the original construction cost estimate of $1,604,750 awarded in the initial grant award. In response, both the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the City have agreed to contribute additional funds to fully fund the construction costs.
643
Section , Item E
Unified Field Services Corporation, based in Bakersfield, California, holds current and active Class A and B contractor licenses in the State of California. Attached is a summary of the responsive bids received.

Additionally, the City solicited proposals from three qualified firms for construction management and observation services. Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group and Vanir Construction Management submitted informal letter proposals and a third firm, Accenture, was non-responsive. Upon reviewing the scope and fee proposals, the City staff recommend awarding the construction management (CM) services to Vanir Construction Management in the amount of $128,725.

Lastly, staff recommends the City council authorize a construction contingency of up to 5% of the total construction cost to be funded from the City’s Well Operations and Maintenance Fund to provide funds for required environmental mitigation, testing, inspection, and unforeseen contingencies.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Council of the City of Fowler adopted Resolution No. 2705 on February 6, 2024, adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, finding that with the inclusion of mitigation measures the Project would not have a significant impact to the environment.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:

Policy SAF-14
Maintain the domestic water system in accordance with applicable water quality standards Policy PF-16
Design and construct water system infrastructure as needed to meet current and future water demands and system requirements.

SAF-14a
Monitor funding sources for improvements, if necessary, to maintain the domestic water system in accordance with applicable water quality standards.

FISCAL IMPACT
After the funding agreement amendment, DWR is contributing $2,856,725 towards construction. The remaining $796,561 will be paid from available City well maintenance and operation funds.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
644
Section , Item E
The Project was competitively bid online via PlanetBids, with seven (7) contractors submitting responsive bids. Unified Field Services Corporation was the lowest bidder and, if awarded, would serve as the general contractor responsible for the Project’s construction. This item is being brought for City Council consideration consistent with the Fowler Municipal Code and California Public Contracts Code.

Vanir Construction Management was selected through an informal competitive bid process for the CM services. This item is being brought for City Council consideration consistent with the City’s Purchasing Policy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Project Plans
- Project Bid Summary
- Construction Contract
- Vanir Construction Management CM proposal
645
Section , Item E
□ □ □
□ LP
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
PP
24IN STUMP
LP
18IN DEC
FH
LP
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
12IN DEC
□
□
□
□
□
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 9 CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

GENERAL

COVER SHEET
RBT
92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024
261922024
G1
1 29
12/3/2024 11:45 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G1 COVER SHEET.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

SITE MAP

VICINITY MAP

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CITY OF FOWLER DROUGHT RESILIENCY PROJECT
AGREEMENT NUMBER: 4600015027
WELL 9

NOT TO SCALE

NOT TO SCALE
99 BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERINGGROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable propertyrights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to beassigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permissionand consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In theevent of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & PritchardEngineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

PROJECT LOCATION
99 WELL 9 SITE

LOCATION

GOLDEN STATE BLVD

CITY OF
FOWLER

E ADAMS AVE

S TEMPERANCE AVE

STANFORD AVEE SOUTH AVE

SHEET INDEX
SEQ.

SHEET NO. SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION

GENERAL
1 G1 COVER SHEET
2 G2 LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
3 G3 GENERAL NOTES
4 G4 GENERAL NOTES
CIVIL
5 C1 DEMOLITION PLAN
6 C2 PROPOSED WELL 9 SITE PLAN
7 C3 FUTURE TREATMENT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
8 C4 PROPOSED WELL 9 GRADING PLAN
9 C5 PROPOSED WELL 9 PIPING PLAN
10 C6 PROPOSED WELL 9 BLOCK WALL PLAN

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
11 CD1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
12 CD2 WELL EQUIPPING DETAILS
13 CD3 WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS
14 CD4 WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS
15 CD5 GRADING DETAILS AND SECTIONS
16 CD6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
17 CD7 SHADE STRUCTURE DETAILS
18 CD8 CHAIN LINK GATE DETAILS
19 CD9 CITY STANDARD DETAILS
20 CD10 CITY STANDARD DETAILS

ELECTRICAL
21 E0.1 GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
22 E0.2 SCHEDULES AND SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
23 E1.0 SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL
24 E2.1 DETAILS
25 E2.2 DETAILS
26 E2.3 DETAILS
27 NO.1 INSTRUMENTATION COVER SHEET
28 NO.2 MISC. P&ID
29 NO.3 WELL P&ID

TOPOGRAPHY NOTE

TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS COLLECTED BY PROVOST &

PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP DURING A FIELD SURVEY
CONDUCTED IN JANUARY OF 2023.

BOUNDARY NOTE

THE BOUNDARY/EASEMENT INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE

PLANS IS BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION TIED TO PHYSICAL

MONUMENTS, AND WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF
BRYAN W. BOWERS, PLS 8469.

CITY OF FOWLER DATE

APPROVALS

UTILITY CONTACTS

CITY OF FOWLER PUBLIC WORKS
(559) 834-3113 EXT 121

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
(559) 263-5695

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
(559) 739-2308

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
(559) 426-7837

COMCAST
(559) 455-4202

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
(559) 233-9665

COUNTY OF FRESNO
(559) 600-4240

CONTROL TABLE
CCS ZONE 4(NAD83) STATE PLANE COORDINATES (USFT)
POINT #
101
102
103

NORTHING
2109519.65
2109665.59
2109558.90

EASTING
6360122.07
6360115.88
6360322.11

ELEVATION
301.09
300.84
300.82

DESCRIPTION

SET MAG NAIL

SET MAG NAIL
POINT 101

SET MAG NAIL
301.09

STANFORD AVE

E SOUTH AVE

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME

PROJECT SITE
POINT 102

SET MAG NAIL
300.84
POINT 103

SET MAG NAIL
300.82

SURVEY CONTROL POINT MAP

NOT TO SCALE

CITY OF FOWLER DROUGHT

RESILIENCY PROJECT
WELL NO. 9
FOR

CITY OF FOWLER

FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN FULL OR IN PART FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES.

FINANCED UNDER THE

SMALL COMMUNITY DROUGHT RELIEF PROGRAM

ADMINISTERED BY

CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
ENGINEER: PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
CONTRACTOR:

DWR PROJECT FUNDING SIGN
NOTES

1. THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN SKETCH THAT IS NOT TO SCALE

2. PROVIDE ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR SIGN AS SITE CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE.

3. KEEP SIGN A PROPER DISTANCE ABOVE PREVAILING GRADE TO PERMIT PUBLIC VIEWING.

4. SIZE DWR LOGO TO PERMIT PUBLIC VIEWING

5. PAINT LETTERS BLUE (BLUE NO. 15102 IN FEDERAL COLOR STANDARD NO. 595)

6. DWR LOGO AT: https://d3.water.ca.gov/owncloud/index.php/s/s8CFdC3cvgf9v9p/download 3' to 5'
4' to 8'

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS

CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
12/03/2024
646
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 9 CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

GENERAL

LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS
RBT
92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024
261922024
G2
2 29
12/3/2024 11:45 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G2 LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERINGGROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable propertyrights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to beassigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permissionand consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In theevent of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & PritchardEngineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

AB AGGREGATE BASE

AC ASPHALT CONCRETE

AGG AGGREGATE

ALT ALTERNATE

AP ANGLE POINT

APPROX APPROXIMATE

APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

ARV AIR RELIEF VALVE

ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS

AV AIR VENT

AVE AVENUE

AWWA AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION

BC BEGIN CURVE

BD BRASS DISK

BFP BACKFLOW PREVENTER

BBLDG BUILDING

BM BENCHMARK

BO BOLLARD

BTM BOTTOM

BVC BEGIN VERTICAL CURVATURE

BW BACK OF WALK

BWL BACK OF WALL

C, CONC CONCRETE

CA CALIFORNIA

CAB CABINET

CBL CABLE

CFS CUBIC FEET PER SECOND

C&G CURB & GUTTER

CHK CHECK

CHLK CHAIN LINK

CI CAST IRON

CIP CAST IRON PIPE

CIPCP CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PIPE
CL CLASS ℄ CENTERLINE

CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE

CLR CLEAR, CLEARANCE

CMLC CEMENT MORTAR LINED & COATED

CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CN CONCRETE NAIL

CNS COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL

CO SEWER CLEAN OUT

CONT CONTINUOUS

CONST CONSTRUCT/CONSTRUCTION

COR CORNER

CORP CORPORATION

COL COLUMN

COUP COUPLING

CP CONTROL POINT

CR CROWN

CU CUBIC

CY CUBIC YARDS

DA DRIVE APPROACH

DEC DECIDUOUS

DEMO DEMOLISH/DEMOLITION

DI DROP INLET
DIA, Ø DIAMETER

DIM DIMENSION

DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE

D/S DOWNSTREAM

DW DRIVEWAY

DWG DRAWING
(E) EXISTING, EAST

EA EACH

EC END CURVE

ECC ECCENTRIC

EF EACH FACE

EG EXISTING GRADE

EL, ELEV ELEVATION

ELC EPOXY LINED & COATED

ELEC ELECTRIC

ELL ELBOW

EM ELECTRIC METER

EOL END OF LINE

EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT

EQUIV EQUIVALENT

ESMT EASEMENT

EUC EUCALYPTUS

EVC END VERTICAL CURVE

EW EACH WAY

EX EXISTING

EXP EXPOSED
[F] FUTURE

F&I FURNISH & INSTALL

FD FOUND

FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FF FINISHED FLOOR

FG FINISHED GRADE

FH FIRE HYDRANT
, FL FLOW LINE

FLG FLANGE

FLGD FLANGED

FM FORCE MAIN

FNC FENCE

FRP FIBER REINFORCED POLYESTER PIPE

FT FOOT/FEET

FW FRONT OF WALK

FWL FACE OF WALL

GA GAUGE

GAL GALLON

GALV GALVANIZED

GB GRADE BREAK

GJ GROOVED JOINT

GM GAS METER

GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE

GRVL GRAVEL
GS GAS

GSV GAS VALVE

GUY GUY WIRE

GV GATE VALVE

HD HEAD

HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE

HDR HEADER

HDW HEADWALL

HGL HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

HORIZ HORIZONTAL

HP HINGE POINT, HIGH POINT, HORSEPOWER

HPS HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH

HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL

HYDRO HYDROPNEUMATIC

ID INSIDE DIAMETER

IN INCH

INV INVERT

IP IRON PIPE

IRR IRRIGATION

LBS POUNDS

LC LENGTH OF CURVE

LF LINEAR FEET

LT LEFT

MAX MAXIMUM

MB MAILBOX

MCC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER

ME MATCH EXISTING

MFR MANUFACTURER

MH MANHOLE

MIN MINIMUM

MISC MISCELLANEOUS

MJ MECHANICAL JOINT

MN MAG NAIL

MPT MALE PIPE THREAD

MRKR MARKER
(N) NORTH

NAVD NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM

NC NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED

NGVD NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM

NIC NOT IN CONTRACT

NPT NATIONAL PIPE THREAD

NTS NOT TO SCALE

OC ON CENTER

OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER

OH OVERHEAD

OP OPERATING

OSHA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

O&M OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
(P) PROPOSED

PB PULL BOX

PC POINT OF CURVATURE

PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

PCC PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

PER PERIMETER

PI POINT OF INTERSECTION
PLC PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER ⅊ PROPERTY LINE

PL PROPERTY LINE

PNL PANEL

POC POINT ON CURVE

POL POINT ON LINE

POT POINT ON TANGENT

PP POWER POLE

PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE

PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT

PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PT POINT OF TANGENCY

PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

PVCC POINT OF VERTICAL COMPOUND CURVATURE

PVMT PAVEMENT

PVRC POINT OF VERTICAL REVERSE CURVATURE

PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION R RADIUS

RBR REBAR

RC RADIUS OF CURVE

RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RD ROAD

RE REFERENCE

REQD REQUIRED

RET RETURN

REV REVISION

RGRCP RUBBER GASKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL

RT RIGHT

RTU REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT

R/W RIGHT OF WAY
(S) SOUTH
S= SLOPE

SCH SCHEDULE

SD STORM DRAIN

SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SEC SECTION

SERV SERVICE

SF SQUARE FEET

SP SERVICE POLE

SPEC SPECIFICATION

SQ SQUARE

SS SANITARY SEWER

SS OR STS STAINLESS STEEL

SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STA STATION

STD STANDARD

STL STEEL

STP STAND PIPE

STRC STRUCTURE

STRP STRIPING

SWL SWALE
(T) THREADED T THREAD

TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK

TC TOP OF CURB

TELE TELEPHONE

TF TOP OF FOOTING

TFC TOP FACE OF CURB

TG TOP OF GRATE

TH THREAD

TOE TOE OF SLOPE

TOP TOP OF SLOPE

TP TELEPHONE POLE

TR TELEPHONE RISER

TRANS TRANSFORMER

TRFC TRAFFIC

TS TOP OF STRUCTURE

TSB TELEPHONE SPLICE BOX

TYP TYPICAL

TWL TOP OF WALL

UG UNDERGROUND

UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE

UP UTILITY POLE

UT UTILITY

VERT VERTICAL

VG VALLEY GUTTER

VLT VAULT

VLV VALVE
(W) WEST W WATER

WL WATER LINE

WM WATER METER

WS WATER SERVICE

WV WATER VALVE

W/ WITH

W/O WITHOUT

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING

LINETYPE
NEW
DESCRIPTION o o
123 o o □ □ □ □ x x x x123

GRADE BREAK

EMBANKMENT TOP

EMBANKMENT TOE
UTV
SS
SDW
UE UE
SD
SS
OTV
UTV
OE
UT
XX" ELEC (AERIAL)
OT
OTV
OE
UCO
XX" C/C
FO

GRATING
EARTH

CONCRETE

AC PAVEMENT

DESCRIPTION

LINETYPES

EXISTING

HATCH TYPE
NEW

REVISION CLOUD

STATE/COUNTY/CORPORATE LIMIT

SECTION LINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT

CENTERLINE
WATER

TELEVISION (BURIED LINE)

TELEVISION (AERIAL LINE)

TELEPHONE (BURIED)

TELEPHONE (AERIAL)

STORM DRAINAGE

SANITARY SEWER
GAS

FIBER-OPTIC

ELECTRIC (BURIED)

ELECTRIC (AERIAL)
COMPUTER/COMM. (BURIED)

FENCE (WIRE)

FENCE (WOOD)

FENCE (CHAIN LINK)

FENCE (CMU BLOCK WALL)

CONTOUR (MINOR)

CONTOUR (MAJOR)
XX" ELEC (BURIED)
XX" FO
XX" GAS
XX" SS
XX" SD
XX" TELE (AERIAL)
XX" TELE (BURIED)
XX" TV (AERIAL)
XX" TV (BURIED)
XX"

SAWCUT LINE

VVVVVVV

AGGREGATE

DEMO LINE

DETAIL NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER #
SHT

SECTION VIEW

SPOT ELEVATION

PIPE END

PIPE END (SCHEMATIC)

LINE BREAK

DETAIL CALLOUT

CONSTRUCTION CALLOUT

REVISION

FENCE GATE

FENCE POST

BACK FLOW PREVENTOR

AIR RELIEF VALVE

BLOW-OFF

WATER VALVE
WELL

WATER METER BOX AND METER

FIRE HYDRANT

TELEPHONE VAULT

TELEPHONE RISER

MONUMENT

IRON PIPE

BENCH MARK

CONTROL POINT
LIGHT
SIGN

MAIL BOX

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN INLET

STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

GAS VALVE

GAS METER

ELECTRIC MANHOLE

UTILITY POLE ANCHOR

UTILITY POLE

ELECTRIC VAULT

PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER

ELECTRIC METER

MONUMENT (OPTIONAL)
(E) XX XXX.XX
XX XXX.XX
W
XX"
XX"
XX"
XX XXX.XX
12/03/2024
647
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 9 CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

GENERAL

GENERAL NOTES
RBT
92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024
261922024
G3
3 29
12/3/2024 11:45 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G3 GENERAL NOTES.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

SPECIAL NOTE

WHERE UNDERGROUND AND SURFACE STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE

LOCATIONS, DEPTH AND DIMENSIONS OF STRUCTURES ARE BELIEVED TO BE REASONABLY CORRECT, BUT ARE NOT GUARANTEED. SUCH STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN FOR THE INFORMATION

OF THE CONTRACTOR, BUT INFORMATION SO GIVEN IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A

REPRESENTATION THAT SUCH STRUCTURES WILL, IN ALL CASES, BE FOUND WHERE SHOWN, OR THAT THEY REPRESENT ALL OF THE STRUCTURES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

SITE SAFETY AND PROTECTION NOTES

THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER, OWNER OR ITS AGENTS TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF

THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND THE UNDERTAKING OF INSPECTIONS OR THE GIVING OF

INSTRUCTIONS AS AUTHORIZED HEREIN IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE

ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION

SITE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUPERVISION OF THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION NOR

MAKE THE ENGINEER, OWNER OR ITS AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A SAFE PLACE FOR

THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS, OR SUPPLIERS, OR FOR ACCESS, VISITS, USE, WORK, TRAVEL OR OCCUPANCY BY ANY PERSON.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AT THE WORK SITE, COPIES OR SUITABLE EXTRACTS OF CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS, ISSUED BY CAL-OSHA. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THESE AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PROMULGATED BY THE SECRETARY OF LABOR UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT, AS SET FORTH IN TITLE 29 C.F.R.

TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND HEALTH OF CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES UNDER THE CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF THE "MANUAL OF ACCIDENT PREVENTION IN CONSTRUCTION" ISSUED BY THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., AND SHALL MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE RECORD OF ALL CASES

OF DEATH, OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE, AND INJURY REQUIRING MEDICAL ATTENTION OR CAUSING

LOSS OF TIME FROM WORK, ARISING OUT OF AND IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT OR WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT.

THE CONTRACTOR ALONE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY, EFFICIENCY, AND

ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S FACILITIES, APPLIANCES, AND METHODS AND FOR ANY DAMAGE,

WHICH MAY RESULT FROM THEIR FAILURE OR THEIR IMPROPER CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE OR OPERATION.

THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IT SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR

JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER, PROVOST & PRITCHARD

CONSULTING GROUP, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY,

REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT,

EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF OWNER, ENGINEER, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS.

THE OWNER AND ITS AGENTS' SITE RESPONSIBILITIES ARE LIMITED SOLELY TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THEIR EMPLOYEES ON SITE. THESE RESPONSIBILITIES SHALL NOT BE INFERRED BY ANY PARTY TO MEAN THAT THE OWNER OR ITS AGENTS HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITE SAFETY.

SAFETY IN, ON, OR ABOUT THE SITE IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR ALONE. THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF WORK PERFORMANCE,

SUPERINTENDENCE AND THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES, AND SEQUENCING OF

CONSTRUCTION ARE ALSO THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR ALONE.

GENERAL NOTES

1. THE CITY OF FOWLER SHALL BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ON OR NEAR EXISTING CITY FACILITIES.

2. USED MATERIAL, REJECTS, MISFITS, OR SECONDS, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON CITY FACILITIES.

3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING FACILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) AT 8-1-1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ENGINEER AWARE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.

5. ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE FORMED INSIDE AND OUT AND

CONCRETE VIBRATED SUFFICIENTLY TO PROVIDE FOR SMOOTH SURFACED WALLS/FLOORS WITHOUT VOIDS AND HONEYCOMBS.

6. THE CITY SHALL INSPECT ALL WORK PHASES ON CONCRETE FACILITIES FOR CONFORMANCE TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS. REINFORCING SHALL NOT BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE WITHOUT PRIOR CITY INSPECTIONS. LIKEWISE, CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE COVERED WITH EARTH PRIOR TO CITY INSPECTION.

7. ALL NUTS, BOLTS, AND WASHERS USED TO SECURE UNDERGROUND FITTINGS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. AFTER INSTALLATION, ALL STEEL HARDWARE SHALL BE COATED WITH A RUST PREVENTATIVE, WRAPPED WITH 4 MIL POLYETHYLENE SHEETING, AND SECURE WITH PVC TAPE.

8. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE HEALTH AND SAFETY LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CAL/OSHA STANDARDS.

9. CONCRETE VAULTS AND BOXES MAY BE PURCHASED FROM A PRECAST MANUFACTURER

OR CONTRACTOR MAY CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURES IF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.

10. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL AND/OR DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION.

11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE DUST CONTROL AT ALL TIMES.

12. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE SITE AT ALL TIMES AND PROHIBIT ACCESS DURING ANY NON-WORKING HOURS.

13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL EXISTING FACILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW ADVANCE DECISIONS TO BE MADE ON NECESSARY RELOCATIONS OR GRADE CHANGES TO PROPOSED FACILITIES. THE CITY AND RESPECTIVE

UTILITY AUTHORITY SHALL APPROVE FIELD CHANGES THAT INCLUDE ANY RELOCATIONS AND GRADE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH EXISTING FACILITY CONFLICTS.

14. THE CITY OF FOWLER WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE TO IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER FACILITIES IN THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR POTHOLING AND PHYSICALLY VERIFYING THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF WATER AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES.

15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY PERMITS REQUIRED BY FRESNO COUNTY AND THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM

THE WORK AND SHALL ABIDE BY THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMITS AND SHALL PERFORM

ALL WORK ORDERED BY SAID PERMITS IN CONFORMANCE THEREWITH AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.

16. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER CAN MAKE NO GUARANTEE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE UTILITY FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME

CAUTION WHEN EXCAVATING IN PROXIMITY OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND PROTECT EXISTING FACILITIES.

17. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE AND

SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION OF ANY STORM DRAIN FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT VICINITY

18. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ANY DISRUPTIONS TO THE WATER SYSTEM WITH THE CITY OF FOWLER AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE.

19. THE CITY OF FOWLER OR THEIR AGENT SHALL INSPECT ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.

20. SEE CITY STANDARD DETAIL W-14 "WATER MAIN CONNECTION PROCEDURE" ON SHEET CD10 FOR PROCEDURE ON CONNECTING TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM

DEMOLITION

1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS, ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR.

GRADING

1. THE WORK EMBRACED HEREIN SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 33 OF 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED.

2. THE WORK EMBRACED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE COMMENCED UNTIL THE OWNER OF THE

PROPERTY OR THE CONTRACTOR HAS FIRST BEEN PROVIDED AN INQUIRY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR SUB—SURFACE INSTALLATIONS AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE.

3. A GRADING PERMIT OR VOUCHER SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF FOWLER PRIOR TO ANY GRADING AND PAVING WORK FOR THIS PROJECT.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM ANY PROPERTY OWNER

GIVING THEM PERMISSION TO ENTER THEIR PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSES OF

CONSTRUCTING THE IMPROVEMENTS DELINEATED ON THE PLANS AND TRANSITIONS THERETO.

5. ANY DIRT OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO ANY EXISTING ROAD FROM THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CLEANED OFF AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY.

6. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY AUTHORITIES

OR UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING POSSIBLE INTEREST IN THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR'S

INTENTION TO EXCAVATE PROXIMATE TO EXISTING FACILITIES AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY UTILITIES IN THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY U.S.A. TWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION.

7. PROVIDE THE CITY OF FOWLER WITH "AS BUILT" PLANS UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING

8. ANY VERTICAL CUT OR FILL DIFFERENTIAL EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN TWELVE (12)

INCHES BETWEEN ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY AN APPROVED RETAINING WALL.

9. DIFFERENTIALS LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES ARE TO HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF ONE (1) VERTICAL TO TWO (2) HORIZONTAL.

10. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ORGANIC MATTER, DEBRIS, AND OTHER

DELETERIOUS OR EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF AT AN APPROVED LOCATION.

11. ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS WITHIN THE AREA OF WORK SHALL BE PRESERVED OR RESET BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR.

12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR DUST CONTROL FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE FULLY AND ADEQUATELY

CARRIED OUT ON WEEKDAYS, WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, AND WHEN NECESSARY, BEFORE OR AFTER NORMAL WORKING HOURS.

13. PRIOR TO THE LAYING OF THE SUB BASE OR BASE ON THE ROADWAY, THE CITY'S

ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE SUB GRADE ELEVATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.

14. ALL SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND UTILITY MANHOLES AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE AS NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THIS WORK.

ALL WATER MAIN VALVES (CAP AND LID) SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE AS NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDED IN THIS WORK.

15. THE COSTS OF ALL REPEAT TESTING REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE OF WORK SHALL BE FULLY BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.

16. PERMANENT TRENCH RESURFACING TO BE PER CITY STANDARD, OR AS DETAILED.

17. TEMPORARY TRENCH RESURFACING TO BE A MINIMUM 4" THICK COLD MIX.

18. TRENCH CUTS IN EXISTING STREETS THAT ARE NOT TO BE RECONSTRUCTED OR OVERLAID SHALL HAVE PERMANENT TRENCH RESURFACING INSTALLED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER INITIAL STREET CUT.

PIPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES

1. THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 22 SECTION 64572 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS. REFER TO WATER MAIN SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS DETAIL.

2. USED MATERIAL, REJECTS, MISFITS, OR SECONDS, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THE PROPOSED FACILITIES.

3. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF ALL PIPELINE CRACKS, WHICH DEVELOP DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AFFECTING EXISTING FACILITIES.

4. WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH BEDDING, PIPE ZONE BACKFILL, MARKER TAPE, AND TRACER WIRE PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD10. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD10.

5. ALL STEEL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH A SHOP APPLIED HIGH SOLIDS EPOXY COATING ON THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL

OTHER EXPOSED STEEL SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A PRE-TREATMENT PRIMER, AN UNDERCOAT AND A FINAL COAT OF PAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS.

6. ALL NUTS, BOLTS, AND WASHERS USED TO SECURE UNDERGROUND FITTINGS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. AFTER INSTALLATION, ALL STEEL HARDWARE SHALL BE COATED WITH A RUST PREVENTATIVE, WRAPPED WITH 4 MIL POLYETHYLENE SHEETING, AND SECURE WITH PVC TAPE.

7. ALL BURIED PRESSURE PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

USE OF THRUST BLOCKS AT LOCATIONS NOT SPECIFIED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.

8. TRENCH RESURFACING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TRENCH RESURFACING DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD10.

9. ALL BURIED WATER MAIN SHALL BE OF THE TYPE AND CLASS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS.

10. ALL ABOVE GROUND PIPE 4" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH

FLANGED CONNECTIONS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS.

11. ALL HARDWARE FOR PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL.

12. GATE VALVES AND VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET CD9.

13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

FENCES, GATES, CONCRETE, AND LANDSCAPING. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED SHALL BE REPLACED "IN KIND" AND RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION.

14. NEW WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE TESTED AND DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.

15. A MINIMUM OF 12" CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE DEPTH OF THE EXISTING SEWER MAIN AS A FIRST ORDER OR WORK.

16. CEMENT SLURRY SHALL BE USED AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS WHERE 12" MINIMUM

CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED

TRENCH AND EXCAVATION NOTES

1. BEDDING MATERIAL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.

2. PIPE INSTALLATIONS ARE TO EMPLOY TRENCH SHORING AND/OR SLOPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY STANDARDS. TYPICAL INSTALLATIONS SHOWN DO NOT

NECESSARILY DEPICT COMPLIANCE WITH SAID STANDARDS AS SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION METHODS (SUCH AS SHIELDS, TRENCH BOXES, ETC.) MAY BE EMPLOYED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID STANDARDS.

3. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.

COUNTY OF FRESNO NOTES

1. NO COUNTY OF FRESNO PUBLIC ROAD SHALL BE CLOSED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE COUNTY OF FRESNO’S MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.

2. NO STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS WILL BE ALLOWED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

3. REPAIR WITH LIKE MATERIALS ANY EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, CURBS, GUTTERS, WALKWAYS,

LANDSCAPING, PLANTS, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE WORK TO AN EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION.

4. DIRT OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO EXISTING COUNTY ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CLEANED OFF AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COUNTY INSPECTOR.

5. ACCESS TO ALL PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, UNLESS

ARRANGEMENTS, IN WRITING ARE MADE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO DEVIATE FROM THIS REQUIREMENT.

6. ALL SIGNING, DETOURING AND BARRICADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE

CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND THE ACCEPTED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN.

7. PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 8771(B) AND 8771(C) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, ANY MONUMENTS THAT

CONTROL THE LOCATION OF BOUNDARIES, OR OTHERWISE PROVIDE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL

SURVEY CONTROL WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA, SHALL BE LOCATED AND REFERENCED PRIOR

TO CONSTRUCTION, AND A CORNER RECORD OR RECORD OF SURVEY OF THE REFERENCES SHALL BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR.
12/03/2024
648
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO: WELL 9 CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

GENERAL

GENERAL NOTES
RBT
92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024
261922024
G4
4 29
12/3/2024 11:45 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\01_General\G4 GENERAL NOTES.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

LOADING CRITERIA

1. MINIMUM LOADING REQUIREMENTS PER CBC 2022

2. DEAD LOAD:

ROOF 10 PSF

3. LIVE LOADS:

SIDEWALKS & DRIVEWAYS 100 PSF
UNRESTRICTED VEHICULAR ACCESS 250 PSF
ROOF 20 PSF

4. GROUND SNOW LOAD, Pg NA

5. RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDING: III

6. WIND LOAD:

ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED: 101
EXPOSURE CATEGORY: B

7. SEISMIC LOAD:

SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION Ss 0.609
SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION S1 0.233
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS SDS 0.533
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENT SD1 0.331
SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR ls 1.25

SITE CLASS D

SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY D

8. WATER LOAD:

DESIGN HIGH WATER LEVEL --

9. FLOOD DESIGN DATA:

FIRM MAP N0. & COUNTY DESIGNATION 06019C2650H, FRESNO
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION Zone X

FLOOD ELEVATION -- FLOOD DESIGN CLASS -- LOWEST FLOOD ELEVATION -- DRY FLOODPROOFED ELEVATION --

10. EARTH LOADS:

ACTIVE EFP 30 PSF/FT
AT-REST EFP 50 PSF/FT
PASSIVE EFP 445 PSF/FT

DESIGN LOAD BEARING VALUES
DEAD PLUS LIVE: 4000 PSF
WIND OR SEISMIC: 5330 PSF

SOIL AND FOUNDATION NOTES

1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BEAR UPON AND/OR

PENETRATE INTO PROPERLY COMPACTED FILL IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE PROJECT'S GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. IN CASE

OF EXPANSIVE CLAY SOIL CONDITIONS, THE OWNER MUST CONSULT WITH

A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE FOUNDATION PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.

2. FOUNDATION WORK TO BE DONE PER 2022 CBC, CHAPTER 18.

3. ENGINEERING DESIGN OF FOUNDATION IS BASED ON PROPOSED NEW WELL - WELL SITE 9 PREPARED BY BSK ASSOCIATES, PROJECT NO.

G00000521, DATED 5/12/2023
PHONE NUMBER OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: (559) 497-2880

4. NOTIFY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR INSTRUCTIONS PRIOR TO

CONTINUING WORK SHOULD ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS BECOME
APPARENT DURING GRADING OR FOUNDATION EXCAVATION. THE

CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

5. SOIL SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS FOR ALL FOUNDATIONS.

6. ALL FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE.

STEEL NOTES

1. ALL EXPOSED STEEL SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED OR PAINTED AS SPECIFIED IN SPECIFICATION 09 90 00.

2. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE:
a. STRUCTURAL SHAPES M, S, HP, C, MC, L, AS PER AISC MANUAL 13th EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A36 (Fy=36 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
b. STRUCTURAL SHAPES W, AISC MANUAL 13th EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A992 (Fy=50 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
c. STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBING, AS PER AISC MANUAL 13th EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A500 GRADE B (Fy=46 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. d. STRUCTURAL STEEL PIPE, AS PER AISC MANUAL 13th EDITION, TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A53 GRADE B (Fy=35 ksi) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

3. ANY MATERIAL REQUEST WITH DIFFERENT SPECIFICATIONS THAN NOTED

ABOVE ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGNER, IN A TIMELY MANNER, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND/OR INSTALLATION. ANY ITEM OF A

DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION INSTALLED, WITHOUT SPECIFIC PRIOR WRITTEN

APPROVAL MAY NOT MEET THE PROJECT ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS

NECESSITATING A REMOVAL AND/OR SIGNIFICANT REVISION TO ITEMS INSTALLED.

4. STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILING, FABRICATION AND ERECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 13th EDITION OF THE AISC MANUAL AND THE LATEST EDITION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILING BY THE AISC.

5. A STEEL BUILDING IS STRUCTURALLY STABLE WHEN ALL ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE WHEN AND WHERE TEMPORARY BRACING IS NEEDED.

6. WELDS SHALL BE MADE WITH WIRE OR ELECTRODE HAVING A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 70,000 PSI, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER 48 HOURS BEFORE PLACEMENT OF

REINFORCING STEEL AND CONCRETE SO THAT THE SUBGRADE OF EXCAVATIONS MAY BE INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY BACKFILL MATERIAL, BACKFILLING PROCEDURES AND SOIL COMPACTION TESTS.

2. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER(S) OF RECORD OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 2022, SECTION 1704.

ALL RISK CATEGORY III AND IV STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION.

STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL CONSIST OF SITE VISITS AT INTERVALS APPROPRIATE

TO THE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION TO OBSERVE CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS AND

REVIEW OF TESTING AND INSPECTION REPORTS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE STRUCTURAL WORK AND THE NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE.

3. SPECIAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 2022 SECTIONS 1704 & 1705, SHALL BE

REQUIRED AS INDICATED IN THE SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET.

4. ALL SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED MUST BE BY APPROVED INDEPENDENT INSPECTORS WHO SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE OWNER. INSPECTORS SHALL SUBMIT THEIR REPORTS

DIRECTLY TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. THESE INSPECTORS ARE IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIRED AGENCY INSPECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSPECTIONS AND ALLOW ACCESS FOR THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM REQUIRED INSPECTIONS.

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION (CBC TABLE 1705.3)

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

1. INSPECTION OF REINFORCING STEEL,

INCLUDING PRESTRESSING TENDONS

AND PLACEMENT
X
ACI 318

25.2, 25.3, 26.6
CBC 1908.4

3. INSPECTION OF ANCHORS CAST IN

CONCRETE WHERE ALLOWABLE LOADS

HAVE BEEN INCREASED OR WHERE

STRENGTH DESIGN IS USED
X ACI 318, 17.8.2

4. POST-INSTALLED ANCHORS

4.1 CONFORMANCE WITH

CONSTRUCTION DOCS AND

MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION

INSTRUCTIONS

4.2 HOLE DRILLING METHOD

4.3 ANCHOR EDGE DISTANCE AND

SPACING

4.4 HOLE DIAMETER AND DEPTH

4.5 HOLE CLEANING

4.6 ANCHOR TYPE, MATERIAL, DIAMETER

AND LENGTH

4.7 ADHESIVE TYPE AND EXPIRATION
DATE
* X
*ADHESIVE ANCHORS IN

OVERHEAD OR

HORIZONTAL CONDITION

SHALL BE

CONTINUOUS

INSPECTION
ACI 318, 17.8.2.4
ACI 318, 17.8.2
4a. PROOF LOADING IN OVERHEAD

ORIENTATION X

ALL TYPES AND
10% OF

ANCHORS

5. VERIFYING USE OF REQUIRED DESIGN
MIX X
ACI 318, CH. 19,

26.4.3, 26.4.4

6. AT THE TIME FRESH CONCRETE IS

SAMPLED TO FABRICATE SPECIMENS

FOR STRENGTH TESTS, PERFORM SLUMP

AND AIR CONTENT TESTS, AND

DETERMINE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE

CONCRETE
X
ASTM C172
ASTM C31
ACI 318, 26.5,

26.12 CBC 1908.10

7. INSPECTION OF CONCRETE AND

SHOTCRETE PLACEMENT FOR PROPER

APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
X
ACI 318, 26.5
CBC 1908.6,
1908.7, 1908.8

8. INSPECTION FOR MAINTENANCE OF

SPECIFIED CURING TEMPERATURE AND

TECHNIQUES
X
ACI 318,

26.5.3-26.5.5
CBC 1908.9

10. MATERIAL VERIFICATION OF

REINFORCEMENT STEEL

MANUFACTURER SHALL

PROVIDE MILL TEST

REPORTS-SEE CBC FOR

EXCEPTIONS
ACI 318, 26.6
CBC 1705.12.1

14. INSPECT FORMWORK FOR SHAPE,

LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE

CONCRETE MEMBER BEING FORMED
X
ACI 318,

26.11.1.2(b)

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF SOILS
(CBC TABLE 1705.6)

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

1. VERIFY MATERIALS BELOW SHALLOW

FOUNDATIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO

ACHIEVE THE DESIGN BEARING

CAPACITY
X
CBC 1705.6
CBC 1804

2. VERIFY EXCAVATIONS ARE EXTENDED

TO PROPER DEPTH AND HAVE REACHED

PROPER MATERIAL
X

3. PERFORM CLASSIFICATION AND

TESTING OF COMPACTED FILL

MATERIALS
X

4. VERIFY USE OF PROPER MATERIALS,

DENSITIES AND LIFT THICKNESSES

DURING PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION

OF COMPACTED FILL
X

5. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF

COMPACTED FILL, OBSERVE SUBGRADE

AND VERIFY THAT SITE HAS BEEN

PREPARED PROPERLY
X

REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF STEEL

CONSTRUCTION

VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC COMMENTS REFERENCES

3. MATERIAL VERIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COLD-FORMED STEEL DECK A. FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL,

IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO CONFORM
TO AISC 360
X
AISC 360
SECTION M5.5
B. FOR OTHER STEEL, IDENTIFICATION

MARKINGS TO CONFORM TO ASTM

STANDARDS SPECIFIED IN THE

APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
X

APPLICABLE

ASTM MATERIAL

STANDARDS
C. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED TEST

REPORTS
X

MANUFACTURER

TO PROVIDE

CERTIFIED MILL

REPORTS

4. MATERIAL VERIFICATION OF WELD FILLER MATERIALS
A. IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO

CONFORM TO AWS SPECIFICATION IN

THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS
X
AISC 360
SECTION A3.3,
AND

APPLICABLE
AWS A5

DOCUMENTS
B. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE REQUIRED
X

MANUFACTURER

TO PROVIDE

CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE

5. INSPECTION OF WELDINGS
A. STRUCTURAL STEEL AND COLD-FORMED STEEL DECK
1) COMPLETE AND PARTIAL JOINT

PENETRATION GROOVE WELDS
X

SPECIAL

INSPECTIONS IN

THIS SECTION ARE

WAIVED WHERE

FABRICATION IS

PERFORMED ON

THE PREMISES OF

A FABRICATOR

REGISTERED AND

APPROVED IN

ACCORDANCE

WITH CBC SECTION
1704.2
AWS D1.1
CBC 1704.3.1
2) MULTIPASS FILLET WELDS X
3) SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS > 5/16" X
4) PLUG AND SLOT WELDS X
5) SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS <= 5/16" X
6) FLOOR AND ROOF DECK WELDS
X
AWS D1.5
CBC 1704.3.1
B. REINFORCING STEEL
1) VERIFICATION OF WELDABILITY OF

REINFORCING STEEL OTHER THAN ASTM
A706 X

SPECIAL

INSPECTIONS IN

THIS SECTION ARE

WAIVED WHERE

FABRICATION IS

PERFORMED ON

THE PREMISES OF

A FABRICATOR

REGISTERED AND

APPROVED IN

ACCORDANCE

WITH CBC SECTION
1704.2
AWS D1.4
ACI 318,
SECTION 3.5.2
CBC 1704.3.1
2) REINFORCING STEEL RESISTING

FLEXURAL AND AXIAL FORCES IN

INTERMEDIATE AND SPECIAL MOMENT

FRAMES, AND BOUNDARY ELEMENTS OF

SPECIAL STRUCTURAL WALLS OF

CONCRETE AND SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
X
3) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT X
4) OTHER REINFORCING STEEL X

7. SPRAYED FIRE-RESISTANT MATERIALS X CBC 1704.12

8. MASTIC AND INTUMESCENT

FIRE-RESISTANT COATINGS
X CBC 1704.13
AWS 12-B

REINFORCING STEEL NOTES

1. ALL REBAR SHALL BE ASTM A615-GRADE 60.

2. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A1064.

3. ALL BARS SHALL BE FREE OF EXCESSIVE RUST, MUD, OIL, AND GREASE.

4. ARRANGEMENT AND DETAILING OF REINFORCING STEEL, INCLUDING BAR SUPPORTS AND SPACERS, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ACI 315 DETAILING MANUAL.

5. REINFORCING SHALL LAP A MINIMUM OF 1.3 Ld AT SPLICES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, WHERE Ld IS THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT LENGTH. WHEN BARS OF

DIFFERENT SIZE LAP TO EACH OTHER, SPLICE LENGTH FOR THE SMALLER BAR CAN BE USED. DOWELS SHALL HAVE THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING AS THAT OF THE

REINFORCING STEEL THEY ARE SPLICING AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LAP AS NOTED ABOVE. BAR SPLICES SHALL BE STAGGERED.

6. HOOK BARS AT OPENINGS.

7. TERMINATE ALL BARS IN LAPS OR 90° BENDS.

8. ALL REINFORCING MAY LAP WITH COUPLERS WHICH ARE 125% OF BAR STRENGTH OR GREATER. SUMBIT AN ICC REPORT FOR COUPLERS.

9. IF ONE LAYER OF REINFORCING STEEL IS SHOWN, IT IS TO BE LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE SECTION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

10. DIMENSIONS TO REINFORCING ARE TO BAR CENTERLINES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BAR COVER IS CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BAR AND THE CONCRETE SURFACE. UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE, BAR COVER FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT COVER

SIZE COVER (IN)

CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH
ALL SIZES 3

CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER
#6 - #18 BAR 2
#5 BAR, W31 OR D31 WIRE,
AND SMALLER 1 1/2

CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT WITH GROUND #14 & #18 BARS 1 1/2
#11 BAR & SMALLER 3/4

CONCRETE NOTES

1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONSISTING OF TYPE II/V PORTLAND CEMENT, FINE AGGREGATE, COARSE AGGREGATE, AND WATER (WATER:CEMENT RATIO SHALL NOT EXCEED

0.45 ABSOLUTE BY WEIGHT, AND SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES ±1 INCH). THE CONCRETE

SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN ONE AND ONE-HALF HOURS FROM THE TIME WATER IS INTRODUCED TO YIELD AT 28 DAYS A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WITH AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY (IF NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) AS FOLLOWS:

PAVING, EXTERIOR SLABS, SIDEWALKS, 3,500 PSI, F0, S0, W1, C0

CURBS AND GUTTERS
DRIVEWAYS AND CROSS GUTTERS 4,000 PSI, F0, S0, W1, C0
STRUCTURAL FOOTINGS AND SLABS 3,500 PSI, F0, S0, W1, C0 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 4,000 PSI, F0, S0, W1, C0

2. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 318 (LATEST EDITION).

3. CONCRETE MIXING SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C94.

4. SUBMIT CONCRETE LIFT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND

OTHER TYPES OF JOINTS OTHER THAN SPECIFIED OR SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS FOR

FAVORABLE REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE START OF WORK ON FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL OR PLACING CONCRETE. ANY ADDITIONAL VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL HAVE A STANDARD KEYWAY AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND TYPICAL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE ROUGHENED TO 1/4" AMPLITUDE.

5. OPENINGS, PIPE SLEEVES, CONDUITS, INSERTS, AND OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS SHALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE CONCRETE IS PLACED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO

COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, LANDSCAPING, HVAC,

PLUMBING, INSTRUMENTATION, AND OTHER PLANS FOR ITEMS REQUIRING SLEEVES AND

EMBEDMENTS IN CONCRETE WHICH ARE NOT INDICATED OR SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. NO PIPES OR SLEEVES SHALL PASS THROUGH STRUCTURAL MEMBERS UNLESS SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE WITH EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S DRAWNIGS FOR ANCHORING DEVICES.

6. CONCRETE SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM PREMATURE DRYING FOR A CURING PERIOD OF AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER IT IS PLACED. EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE KEPT CONTINUOUSLY MOIST FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD. IN LIEU OF WATER CURING, THE CONCRETE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SPRAYING WITH A [NSF] APPROVED CURING COMPOUND. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE KEPT MOIST UNTIL THE COMPOUND IS APPLIED.

7. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED NO GREATER THAN 3X SLAB THICKNESS IN FEET NOR 20 FEET APART IN BOTH DIRECTIONS WITHIN 8 HOURS OF THE CONCRETE PLACEMENT ON ALL CONCRETE SLABS. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN UNREINFORCED SLABS PER PCA GUIDELINES.

8. ALL EXTERIOR SLABS SHALL BE SLOPED TO ALLOW DRAINAGE OF RUNOFF WATER TO PREVENT PONDING.

9. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH. INTERIOR FLOORS AND EXTERIOR SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE TOOLED 3/8 INCH RADIUS CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.

10. ALL SLABS SHALL HAVE A TROWELED FINISH WITH A FF=35 AND A FL=25 MINIMUM UNO. 12/03/2024
649
Section , Item E
300.77 CHK SHOT
300.85 C
301.23 EG
300.77 TC
300.30 FL
300.44 LIP
300.26 LIP
300.20 FL
300.63 TC
300.70 C
300.95 EG
300.58 TC
300.13 FL
300.20 LIP
300.78 C
300.72 EG
300.89 EG
301.06 EG
300.99 EG
301.08 EG
300.49 C
300.46 TC@DI
300.46 TC
300.00 FL
300.00 LIP
299.79 FL
299.97 FL
299.70 FL
300.42 TC
300.02 LIP
300.70 TC
300.24 FL
300.32 LIP
300.95 C
300.93 TC
300.43 FL
300.60 LIP
300.08 FL
300.60 TC
300.25 LIP
300.70 C
300.62 TC@DI 299.89 FL
299.88 FL
300.63 TC
300.16 FL
300.30 LIP
300.86 P
300.83 P
300.77 EG
300.85 EG
300.76 C
300.70 TC
300.40 LIP
300.25 FL
300.91 C
301.10 EG
300.95 EG
300.89 EG
300.76 EG
300.81 EG
301.31 EG
301.35 EG
301.01 C
300.85 TC
300.53 LIP
300.37 FL
300.96 P
300.44 LIP 300.33 FL
300.89 C
300.81 TC
301.31 EG
301.03 C
301.03 C
301.10 C
301.00 C
300.86 C
301.29 C
301.41 C
301.49 C
300.85 TC
300.40 FL
300.55 LIP
300.48 TC
300.41 FL
300.91 GAS UG
301.27 EG
301.28 EG
301.31 EG
301.02 STUB .3' PVC
300.95 TOP
300.64 TOP
300.86 TOP
300.95 TOP
300.65 TOP
300.94 TOP
300.74 TOP
301.01 TOP
301.23 EG
301.12 TOP
301.05 EG
301.51 EG
301.22 TOP
301.47 EG
301.12 TOP
300.89 TOP
301.10 TOP
300.69 EG
301.76 EG
301.17 TOP
301.19 EG
301.30 TOP
301.11 TOP
301.42 TOP
300.71 TOP
291.90 TOE
291.27 TOE
292.06 TOE
290.67 TOE
291.11 TOE
290.66 TOE
292.38 TOE
290.70 TOE
287.14 TOE
283.65 TOE
284.82 TOE
285.44 TOE
289.14 TOE
289.43 TOE
286.73 EG
285.28 EG
282.40 EG
283.01 EG
283.69 EG
284.81 EG
283.43 EG
283.71 EG
282.92 EG
283.27 EG
291.62 EG
289.71 EG
289.42 EG
289.52 EG
290.43 EG
290.80 EG
291.42 EG
291.18 EG
289.91 EG
288.92 EG
288.05 EG
290.15 EG
289.60 EG
286.58 EG
296.55 EG
296.29 EG
290.23 EG
289.64 EG
301.84 C
301.87 C
301.92 C

GATE POST
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE

G G G G G G G G G G G UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

W W W W W W W W W W W W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
W
LP
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
PP
24IN STUMP
WV
WV
WV
S300.65 SSMH
GSV
STOP
WV
WM
FH IR

IRR BOX

GATE POST

GATE POST
LP
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
24IN PINE
WM
12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S
□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □
□ □
□
□
□
□
12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10"
SD
SD
SD
SD
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL

DEMOLITION PLAN
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C1
5 29
12/3/2024 11:45 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C1 DEMOLITION PLAN.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
LEGEND

AC PAVEMENT/CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED

LANDSCAPING/VEGETATION TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING AC PAVINGEXISTING CONCRETEEXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE TO BE REMOVEDDEMO LIMIT LINE, TYPEXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET NOTES

1. DEMOLITION TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF FOWLER, PG&E AND ADJACENT LANDOWNERS.

2. EXISTING BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE
LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE UTILITIES TODETERMINE EXACT LOCATIONS AS A FIRST ORDER OF WORK,PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.

3. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED AND/OR

DEMOLISHED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFFSITE BY THE
CONTRACTOR.

4. ANY SURFACING THAT IS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS SHOWN SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT VOIDS, HOLES,

AND UNEVEN GROUND RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WITH

ENGINEERED FILL IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRENCH BACKFILL DETAILS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. FINISH SURFACING SHALL BEPLACED AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS.

6. PROVIDE PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY FENCING AT ALL TIMES.

7. ALL IMPROVEMENTS NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED TO BE REMOVED

OR ALTERED SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.

8. ALL SAWCUT LINES SHALL BE STRAIGHT AND CLEAN TO PROVIDE A NEAT MATCH CONDITION.

9. CONCRETE REMOVAL SHALL BE TO THE JOINT OR SCORE MARK

NEAREST THE SAWCUT LINE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS
APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.

10. PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.11. DISTURBED LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE

PROTECTION CALLOUTS

ITEM DESCRIPTION

PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING PG&E VAULT IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING WOOD FENCE IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT IN PLACEEXISTING IRRIGATION WATER METER AND IRRIGATION BOX TOBE PROTECTED IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING STREET LIGHT IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENT IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL INPLACEPROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING CATV ENCLOSURE IN PLACEPROTECT EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLETEXISTING LANDSCAPING AND GRASS TO BE PROTECTED INPLACE, TYP ABC
D
E
FG
H
IJK
LM
J
J
I
B
H
F
C
C
A
3 3
3 3

5.5'± 4.5'± (E) 10' PUE
(E) 10' PUE 4.6'± 5.4'±
2 1
G
G

DEMOLITION CALLOUTS

ITEM DESCRIPTION

SITE SHALL BE CLEARED, GRUBBED, AND PREPARED FOR

EARTHWORK AS OUTLINED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM DRAIN OUTLET
PIPE. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION. REMOVEEXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE. SEE SHEET C5 FOR PROPOSED

STORM DRAIN PIPE AT BACK OF EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET

REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE FENCEREMOVE EXISTING WOOD FENCEREMOVE EXISTING TREE 12345
C
Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
F
D
E
A

EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME EXISTING GARAGE

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME
5 EX PL

EX SIDEWALK

EX PL

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP
4 3
K
SD

EXISTING TOP OF BASIN, TYP

EXISTING TOE OF BASIN, TYP

EXISTING TOE OF BASIN, TYP
L

PROTECT EXISTING WATER METER

AND BOX AND ADJUST TO GRADE
C
3 C
43 M
M
M
M

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS
12/03/2024 650
Section , Item E
300.77 CHK SHOT
300.94 E UG
300.91 GAS UG
301.02 STUB .3' PVC

GATE POST
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE
G G

G G G G G G G G

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

W W W W W W W W W W W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
W
W
W
LP
PP
WV
WV
WV
S300.65 SSMH
GSV
STOP
WV
WM
FH IR

IRR BOX
LP
WM
12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S
□
□
□

V V V V V V
V V
V V

V V V V V V
V
V
V
V
12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10" 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
113
115 116
117
118
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
112
119
114

POINT TABLE
POINT #
100
101
102
103104105106107108109110
111
112
113114115116117118119120
121
122
123124125126127

NORTHING
2109721.192109720.67
2109708.71
2109708.842109639.062109615.662109598.682109591.572109589.082109586.03 2109583.95
2109578.972109578.962109580.942109587.43
2109587.41
2109587.402109598.59
2109589.31
2109598.122109615.282109579.142109568.14
2109580.612109578.61
2109649.802109662.062109719.38

EASTING
6360176.82
6360178.81
6360177.176360166.186360182.766360185.626360177.426360180.27 6360175.31
6360185.696360187.726360185.286360186.286360194.856360197.436360203.936360207.936360230.476360238.946360246.476360244.026360297.356360297.326360309.446360309.926360244.256360260.736360311.30

DESCRIPTION

WALL CORNER

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

DRIVEWAY CENTERLINEDRIVEWAY CENTERLINE

YARD LIGHT

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINEVALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

WALL, BEGIN CURVESTORM DRAIN INLET

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

WALL, END CURVE

DRAINAGE CHANNEL, CENTER

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

GENERATOR CONCRETE PADGENERATOR CONCRETE PAD

MCC CONCRETE PADMCC CONCRETE PAD

ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

DRIVEWAY CENTERLINEDRIVEWAY CENTERLINE

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

WALL CORNER

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
WELL

WALL CORNER
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL
PROPOSED WELL 9 SITE PLAN
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C2
6 29
12/3/2024 11:46 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C2 PROPOSED WELL 9 SITE PLAN.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE(E) TELECOMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL, PROTECT IN PLACE(E) PG&E VAULT, PROTECT IN PLACE (E) POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) CATV ENCLOSURE,

PROTECT IN PLACE

CONSTRUCTION CALLOUTS

ITEM HEADER
WELL AND CONCRETE WELL PUMP PAD SEE SHEET CD1

PUMP ENCLOSURE
WELL EQUIPMENT AND MANIFOLD SEE SHEET CD2ADD ALTERNATE No. 1 - GENERATOR AND CONCRETE PAD - SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRMCONCRETE PAD SIZING WITH ELECTRICAL ENGINEER BEFORECONSTRUCTING MCC PAD AND SHADE STRUCTURE-SEE SHEET CD7 ANDELECTRICAL SHEETS

TRANSFORMER-SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS

CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM CONCRETE PAD SIZING WITH

ELECTRICAL ENGINEER BEFORE CONSTRUCTING
1" WATER SERVICE ASSEMBLY CONNECTION WITH METER PER
CITY STANDARD W-1. SEE SHEET CD9
1" REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY PER
CITY STANDARD W-12. SEE SHEET CD9
HOSE RACK-SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET CD3HOSE BIBB-SEE DETAIL 5 SHEET CD3

YARD LIGHT-SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE, FRAME, AND GRATE PER CITYSTANDARD D-3 AND D-7. SEE SHEET CD9STORM DRAIN MANHOLE, FRAME, AND COVER PER CITYSTANDARD D-6 AND D-7. SEE SHEET CD9CHAIN LINK GATE WITH PRIVACY SLATS PER CITY STANDARD M-4 (OMIT BARBED WIRE). SEE SHEET CD8DRIVE APPROACH AND SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD ST-14.

SEE SHEET CD10CMU WALL. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET CD6

BOLLARD-SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS

3.5" AC PAVEMENT OVER 4.5" CLASS 2 AB; UPPER TWO FEETOF SOIL IN PAVEMENT AREAS TO HAVE AN R-VALUE EQUAL TOOR GREATER THAN 50. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT0.58' AC PLUG OVER 0.5' COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 2' GUTTER DRAINAGE CHANNEL - SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET CD5
3 FOOT VALLEY GUTTER - SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET CD53'X3' DROP INLET - SEE DETAIL 10 SHEET CD3

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I J
K
L
M
M
N
N
O
O
P
P
P
P
Q TYP
(E) 10' PUE
(E) 10' PUE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE

5.5'± 4.5'±

4.6'± 5.4'±

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME

EX PL

EX SIDEWALK

EX PL

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) IRRIGATION METER AND BOX

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
R
S
S

EX STORM DRAIN INLET TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVE WAY

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX PL

EX PL
M
CD5A-A
CD5
B-B
CD5
C-C
CD5
C-C
CD5
D-D
T
U
U
Q TYP
Q TYP
R
(E) PROPERTY CORNER

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) PROPERTY CORNER

PROTECT IN PLACE
V

PROTECT EXISTING WATER METER

AND BOX AND ADJUST TO GRADE
ABCE
FG
H
I
JK
LM
NO
PQ
R
S
T
U
V
ADD ALTERNATE No. 1:

GENERATOR ANDCONCRETE PAD

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
D
12/03/2024 651
Section , Item E
W
W

W W W W W W W W W W W W
SS □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G

G G G G G G G G G G G G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
UE

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
W
W W
LP PP
WV
WV
WV
S
300.65 SSMH

GSV STOP WV WMFH IR IRR BOX LP
WM 12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S □ □ □ W W W W W W W V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10"
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL

FUTURE TREATMENT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
(FOR REFERENCE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION)
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C3
7 29
12/3/2024 11:47 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C3 FUTURE TREATMENT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20 SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
[F] SITE CHEMICAL

STORAGE

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE
(F) GAC TREATMENT

SYSTEM AND PIPING
[F] CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
[F] INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT

WATER PIPING
[F] STORM DRAIN PIPE

AND CONNECTION
[F] STORM DRAIN PIPE
[F] STORM DRAIN INLET
[F] STORM DRAIN CONNECTION
NOTE:

FUTURE GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM AND

ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
[F] WATER SUPPLY LINE

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME
FUTURE 12" WATER MAIN
FUTURE 12" WATER MAIN

FUTURE WATER MAIN

AND CONNECTION

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
12/03/2024 652
Section , Item E
300.77 CHK SHOT
300.85 C300.77 TC
300.30 FL
300.44 LIP
301.10 EP
300.98 EP
300.26 LIP
300.20 FL
300.63 TC
300.70 C
300.58 TC
300.13 FL
300.20 LIP
300.78 C
300.94 E UG
300.96 EP
300.72 EG
300.89 EG
301.06 EG
300.99 EG
301.08 EG
300.49 C
300.46 TC@DI
300.46 TC
300.00 FL 300.00 LIP
299.79 FL
299.97 FL
299.70 FL
300.42 TC
300.02 LIP
300.70 TC
300.24 FL
300.32 LIP
300.73 EP
301.15 P
301.05 EP
300.99 EP
300.81 EP
300.75 EP
300.95 C
300.43 FL
300.08 FL
300.60 TC
300.25 LIP
300.70 C
300.62 TC@DI 299.89 FL
299.88 FL
300.63 TC
300.16 FL
300.30 LIP
300.86 P
300.83 P
300.77 EG
300.76 C
300.70 TC
300.40 LIP
300.25 FL
300.91 C
301.10 EG
300.95 EG
300.89 EG
300.76 EG
300.81 EG
301.31 EG
301.35 EG
301.01 C
300.85 TC
300.53 LIP
300.37 FL
300.96 P
300.44 LIP 300.33 FL
300.89 C
300.81 TC
301.31 EG
301.03 C
300.86 C
301.41 C
301.49 C
300.85 TC
300.40 FL
300.55 LIP
300.91 GAS UG
301.27 EG
301.28 EG
301.02 STUB .3' PVC
301.84 C
301.87 C
301.92 C

GATE POST
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE
G G

G G G G G G G G

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

W W W W W W W W W W W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
W
W
W
LP
PP
WV
WV
WV
S300.65 SSMH
GSV
STOP
WV
WM
FH IR

IRR BOX
LP
WM
12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S
□
□
□

V V V V V V
V V
V V

V V V V V V
V
V
V
V
12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10"
AC/C 301.85
AC/C 300.39
AC/C 301.76
AC/C 300.37
AC/C 300.37
AC/C 300.38
AC/C 300.36
FL 300.20
FL,GB 300.21 FL 301.59
FL 301.68
FL 300.20
FL,GB 300.22
C 300.39
C 300.63 C 300.38
C 300.66
TG 300.19

1.5%

0.92%

0.94%

1.20%

6.68%

8.04%

7.70%

6.16%
C 301.80
C 301.53 C 301.76
C 301.71
C 301.85
C 301.05
AC 300.65
C 301.05
AC 300.72
C 301.13
AC 300.69
C 301.13
AC 300.96
C 301.13
AC 300.59
C 301.13
AC 300.86
AC 301.06
AC 301.15
AC 301.07
AC 300.98
C 304.01
AC 301.92
C 304.01
AC 302.01
C 304.01
AC 301.93
C 304.01
AC 301.84
AC 303.05
302.0
301.0
302.0
301.0

1.5%

1.5%
C,ME 300.53
C 300.63
RIM 300.65 RIM 301.28
RIM 301.62
FG 301.89
FG 301.92
FG 301.98
FG 301.53
EG 301.8
EG 301.5
EG 301.5
EG 301.2
EG 301.0
EG 300.9
EG 301.0
EG 300.6
EG 300.8
EG 301.0
EG 301.0
EG 301.4 EG 301.4
C 301.05
AC 300.46
C 301.05
AC 300.54
303.0
C 301.62
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL
PROPOSED WELL 9 GRADING PLAN
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C4
8 29
12/3/2024 11:47 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C4 PROPOSED WELL 9 GRADING PLAN.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE(E) TELECOMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL, PROTECT IN PLACE(E) PG&E VAULT, PROTECT IN PLACE (E) POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) CATV ENCLOSURE,

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) 10' PUE
(E) 10' PUE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE

5.5'± 4.5'±

4.6'± 5.4'±

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME

EX PL

EX SIDEWALK

EX PL

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) IRRIGATION METER AND BOX

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX STORM DRAIN INLET TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVE WAY

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX PL

EX PL
NOTES

1. GRADING QUANTITIES ARE INFORMATIONAL ONLY AND DO
NOT ACCOUNT FOR SHRINKAGE OR EXPANSION. THE VALUES
ARE FOR FINAL, COMPACTED, VOLUMES. CONTRACTOR TO
PREPARE OWN ESTIMATE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES.

2. ESTIMATED GRADING QUANTITIES
CUT = ±5 CUBIC YARDS
FILL = ±4,165 CUBIC YARDSNET (FILL) = ±4,160 CUBIC YARDS

3. GRADING TO CONFORM TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
BSK PROJECT NUMBER G00000521
BREAK OVER ELEV = 300.63'
2' WIDE OPENING IN WALL FOR

BREAK OVER TO OFFSITE
PROPOSED 0.2' CONTOUR

INTERVALS, TYP
PROPOSED 0.2' CONTOUR

INTERVALS, TYP
CD5A-A
CD5
B-B
CD5
C-C
CD5
C-C
CD5
D-D
GRADING DETAILSEE DETAIL 3 ON SHEET CD5

GRADING DETAIL
SEE DETAIL 5 ON SHEET CD5

GRADING DETAIL
SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET CD5
TOP OF CATCH BASIN =
1' ABOVE AC PAVEMENT

CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE

WITH ELECTRICAL ENGINEER

FOR TOP OF CONCRETE PADELEVATION FOR TRANSFORMER
ADD ALTERNATE No. 1:

GENERATOR ANDCONCRETE PAD

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
12/03/2024 653
Section , Item E
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE
G G

G G G G G G G G

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
UE

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

W W W W W W W W W W W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SS
W
W
W
LP
PP
WV
WV
WV
S300.65 SSMH
GSV
STOP
WV
WM
FH IR

IRR BOX
LP
WM
12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S
□
□
□

V V V V V V
V V
V V

V V V V V V
V
V
V
V
12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10"
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL
PROPOSED WELL 9 PIPING PLAN
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C5
9 29
12/3/2024 11:48 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C5 PROPOSED WELL 9 PIPING PLAN.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE

CONNECT (P) STORM DRAIN TO (E) STORM
DRAIN INLET. (E) UNDERGROUND DRYUTILITIES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.

SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPING TO BE

REMOVED AND REPLACED IN KIND

CONNECT TO EXISTING
10" WATER MAIN
RIM 301.28
(P) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
18" SD FL = 295.06' (N,W)
(P) ±5 LF 18" HDPE SD PIPE STUB

FOR FUTURE CONNECTION
S=0.0050
(P)± 5 LF 18" HDPE SD

PIPE STUB FORFUTURE CONNECTION
RIM 300.65
(P) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
18" SD FL = 294.77' (N,E,S)
(P) ±35 LF 18" HDPE SD PIPE
S=0.0064
(P) ±11 LF 18"

HDPE SD PIPE
(P) ±76 LF 12" DUCTILE IRON PIPE

ENCASED IN POLYETHYLENE LINING
1" WATER SERVICE
CD9 CONNECTION WITH METER
1 CD4 2
(E) TELECOMMUNICATIONS

PEDESTAL, PROTECT INPLACE
(E) PG&E VAULT,

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) CATV ENCLOSURE,

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) 10' PUE
(E) 10' PUE
(E) STREETLIGHT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE

5.5'± 4.5'±

4.6'± 5.4'±

EX PL

EX SIDEWALK

EX PL

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) IRRIGATION METER AND BOX

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX PL

PROPOSED WELL
(P) ELECTRICAL

EQUIPMENT
(P) ELECTRICAL

EQUIPMENT ANDBOLLARDS

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME
EX. 18" SD FL = 294.5'± (W,N)
(P) 18" SD FL = 294.5'± (N)
SEE NOTE 1
(P) ±24 LF 18"

HDPE SD PIPE
TG 300.19
(P) STORM DRAIN INLET(P) 18" SD FL = 294.62' (N,S)
(P) ±59 LF 18" HDPE SD PIPE
S=0.0050
(P) ±30 LF 18" HDPE SD PIPE
S=0.0050
S=0.0050
RIM 301.62
(P) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
18" SD FL = 295.28' (E,S,W)
S=0.0050
(P) INSTALL 18" CAP
18" SD FL = 295.31' (E)
(P) DROP INLET
18" SD FL = 295.33' (W)
(P) INSTALL 18" CAP
18" SD FL = 294.80 (S)
NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING

STORM DRAIN PIPE FLOW LINE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION AND SHALL NOTIFY

ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIESPRIOR TO INSTALLATION
1" REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE
CD9 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
3 HOSE BIBB CD3 5
ADD ALTERNATE No. 1

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
12/03/2024 654
Section , Item E
C 301.76
300.77 CHK SHOT
300.85 C300.77 TC
300.30 FL
300.44 LIP
300.26 LIP
300.20 FL
300.63 TC
300.70 C
300.58 TC
300.13 FL 300.20 LIP
300.78 C
300.72 EG
300.89 EG
301.06 EG
300.99 EG
301.08 EG
300.49 C
300.46 TC@DI
300.46 TC
300.00 FL 300.00 LIP
299.79 FL
299.97 FL
299.70 FL
300.42 TC
300.02 LIP
300.70 TC
300.24 FL
300.32 LIP
300.95 C
300.43 FL
300.08 FL
300.60 TC
300.25 LIP
300.70 C
300.62 TC@DI 299.89 FL
299.88 FL
300.63 TC
300.16 FL
300.30 LIP
300.86 P
300.83 P
300.77 EG
300.76 C
300.70 TC
300.40 LIP
300.25 FL
300.91 C
301.10 EG
300.95 EG
300.89 EG
300.76 EG
300.81 EG
301.31 EG
301.35 EG
301.01 C
300.85 TC
300.53 LIP
300.37 FL
300.96 P
300.44 LIP 300.33 FL
300.89 C
300.81 TC
301.31 EG
301.03 C
301.03 C
301.10 C
301.00 C
300.86 C
301.29 C
301.41 C
301.49 C
300.85 TC
300.40 FL
300.55 LIP
300.48 TC
300.41 FL
300.91 GAS UG
301.27 EG
301.28 EG
301.02 STUB .3' PVC
301.84 C
301.87 C
301.92 C

GATE POST
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
UE UE

OE OE OE OE OE OE
G G

G G G G G G G G

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

W W W W W W W W W W W
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
W
LP
PP
WV
WV
WV
S300.65 SSMH
GSV
STOP
WV
WM
FH IR

IRR BOX
LP
WM
12IN DEC

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
D
S
□
□
□

V V V V V V
V V
V V

V V V V V V
V
V
V
V
12" 12" 12"
18" 18"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10"
12"
10" 10" 10"
12"
10"
AC/C 301.85
FL 301.68
C 300.39
C 300.63 C 300.38
C 300.66

0.92%

0.94%

1.20%

1.20%
C 301.80
C 301.53
C 301.85
AC 303.05
C,ME 300.53
C 300.63
FG 301.89 FG 301.92
FG 301.98
FG 301.53
EG 301.8
EG 301.5
EG 301.5
EG 301.2
EG 301.0
EG 300.9 EG 301.0 EG 300.6
EG 300.8
EG 301.0
EG 301.0
EG 301.4 EG 301.4
AC/C 301.76
FL 301.59
C 301.71
C 301.62

17.33'
7'-4" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 300.63

70.67'
7'-4" TALL
TWL = 308.63
STEP TOP OF WALL TF = 301.30STEP FOOTING

46.49'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 309.30
TF = 301.30 STEP TOP OF WALL

45.33'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 309.30
TF = 301.30
40'
7'-4" TALL
TWL = 308.63
TF = 301.30

STEP TOP OF WALL

30.67'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 308.63
TF = 300.63

24.78'
7'-4" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 300.63

STEP FOOTING
STEP TOP OF WALL4.57'
7''-4" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 300.63
42'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 299.96
16' OPENING

62.06'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 307.29
TF = 299.29

STEP TOP OF WALLSTEP FOOTING

15.79' RADIUS = 10' TWL = 307.29
8'-0" TALL TF = 299.29

62.31'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 307.29
TF = 299.29

49.33'
8'-0" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 299.96

STEP TOP OF WALLSTEP FOOTING
16' OPENING

4.48'
7'-4" TALL
TWL = 307.96
TF = 300.63
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA
CIVIL
PROPOSED WELL 9 BLOCK WALL PLAN
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
C6
10 29
12/3/2024 11:48 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\02_Plans_Maps\C6 PROPOSED WELL 9 BLOCK WALL PLAN.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 5 10 20

SCALE IN FEET

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Know what's below. Call before you dig.

WARNING

POWER LINES

OVERHEAD
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE

EXISTING SINGLE

FAMILY HOME

EX PL

EX SIDEWALK

EX PL

EX STORM DRAIN INLET TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE, TYP

EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVE WAY

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX PL

EX PL
NOTES

1. DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE OF WALL
(STREET/OFFSITE SIDE OF WALL)
BREAK OVER ELEV = 300.63'
2' WIDE OPENING IN WALL

FOR STORM WATER BREAK

OVER TO OFFSITE
CD5A-A
CD5B-B
CD5
C-C
CD5
C-C
CD5
D-D

PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTERPER SEPARATE SHEET

PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTERPER SEPARATE SHEET
CD6 2
CD6 2
CD6 2
CD6 2

CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY/COUNTY LIMITS CITY OF FOWLER

COUNTY OF FRESNO
12/03/2024 655
Section , Item E
WELL SECTION 2"Ø SCH 80 STEEL SOUNDING TUBE W/ THREADED CAP. 3"Ø SCH 80 STEEL GRAVEL FILL PIPE W/ THD CAP. MARK CAP W/ TERMINATION DEPTH OF PIPE CONDUCTOR CASING & OUTSIDE GROUT SEAL 5' OF BENTONITE EXTEND BOTTOM OF GRAVEL FILL PIPE TO 5' BELOW TOP OF GRAVEL PACK CEMENT GROUT SEAL MIN 3" THICK OUTSIDE OF CONDUCTOR CASING 30"Ø MIN CONDUCTOR CASING PUMP FOUNDATION 36"Ø MIN BORE HOLE SOUNDING TUBE SUPPORTS WELDED TO THE CASING AT 40' INTERVALS 16"Ø X 3/8" WALL BLANK CASING CEMENT GROUT ANNULAR SEAL FROM TOP OF CONDUCTOR CASING TO TOP OF BENTONITE 16"Ø X 3/8" WALL PERFORATED CASING GRAVEL PACK SRI "PATHFINES" OR APPROVED EQUAL (FOR BIDDING PURPOSES) 3/8" THICK ROUNDED STEEL CAP WELDED TO BOTTOM OF CASING 50 FT DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF CONDUCTOR CASING = 50 FT MIN BOTTOM OF PERFORATED CASING 700 FT BOTTOM OF CASING 710 FT BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 720 FT TOP OF PERFORATED CASING 400 FT SOUNDING TUBE CONNECTION BOX BOTTOM OF ANNULAR SEAL TOP OF GRAVEL PACK 350 FT 495 FT FG 6" CNS TYP 0 FT 28"Ø BORE HOLE COMPRESSION SECTION 400 FT 380 FT CONTRACTOR SHALL BEND CASING TO ACCOMMODATE LEVEL PROBE THROUGH SOUNDING TUBE. BEND PIPE TO A 2' RADIUS AT THE TOP OF CONDUCTOR CASING. 3CD1 460 FT 500 FT 40' PUMP BLANK W/ ACCESS BOX 2"Ø COMPRESSION SECTION WELL PUMP F&I ELECTRICAL CONDUIT & WIRING. ALL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO WELL HEAD SHALL PENETRATE WELL PUMP FOUNDATION AND TERMINATE INSIDE ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE CONDUCTOR CASING BORE HOLE 10"x 1-11/16" COLUMN ASSEMBLY BOWL ASSEMBLY WELL CASING LINE SHAFT FG FTFTGPM FTHP ESTIMATED DEPTH TO SWL ESTIMATED LENGTH OF COLUMN DESIGN FLOWRATE TDH AT DESIGN FLOWRATE ESTIMATED MOTOR REQUIREMENT 65 350 1,500 275 150 ESTIMATED PUMP DATA NOTE 1. WELL AND PUMP DATA HAS BEEN ESTIMATED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. WELL AND PUMP DESIGN SHALL BE FINALIZED BY ENGINEER FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PILOT HOLE. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 1/4" STAINLESS STEEL TUBING AIR LINE WITH DURO WELL WATER LEVEL GAUGE (MODEL NO. CA566), OR APPROVED EQUAL, FOR WATER LEVEL MEASURING. INSTALL AIR LINE TO A DEPTH OF 440 FEET. (4) 1/2" Ø ADHESIVE ANCHORS, 1 AT EACH CORNER, MIN 4" EMBEDMENT CONCRETE STAIRS 5CD1 FGACCOUSTIC PUMP SHELTER WELL PUMP FOUNDATION 8'-0" FG #6 STEEL REBAR @ 12" OC EW T&B WELD REBAR TO CONDUCTOR CASING CONDUCTOR CASING WELL CASING 3" THICK SAND BEDDING 1'-6"
3" MIN
CLR CONDUIT PER ELECTRICAL PLANS 8'-0" SQUARE CONC FOUNDATION GRAVEL FILL PIPE WELL CASING SOUNDING TUBE SECTION A-A PLAN VIEW 3" MIN CLR S=2% S=2% NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL GRAVEL FILL PIPE AND SOUNDING TUBE. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SPECIFIED LEVEL PROBE FITS IN THE STEEL SOUNDING TUBE PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 1CD1
3'-6" CONCRETE STAIRS
5CD1
A
A PUMP ENCLOSURE SEE DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD4 NOTES 1. ATTACH ACOUSTIC PUMP SHELTER TO FOUNDATION WITH STAINLESS STEEL HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ-2 WITH 4 3 4" EMBEDMENT. (1) ANCHOR PER CORNER

2. SOUNDING TUBE, VENT PIPE & GRAVEL FILL PIPE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY SEE NOTE 1 BELOW SEE NOTE 1 BELOW CASING VENT 5' CONCRETE STAIRS
5CD1 CONDUCTOR CASING 1/4" ROUNDED EDGE TYP, ALL CONCRETE EDGES ACCOUSTIC PUMP SHELTER FG 4CD1 WELL HEAD SECTION 2" SCH 40 STEEL VENT PIPE 2" SCH 40 2" THD PLUG STEEL TEE 2" 90° SCH 40 STEEL ELL W/FINE MESH SCREEN OUTLET WELD VENT PIPE AT 45° ANGLE TO WELL CASING. MITER PIPE AND SMOOTH INSIDE EDGES CONDUCTOR CASING WELL CASING 2" SCH 40 STEEL 45° ELBOW OUTLET (36" ABOVE FG) FG TS(24" ABOVE FG) ACCOUSTIC PUMP SHELTER 6" 3"Ø ELEC. CONDUIT (CAP AT BOTH ENDS). ALL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO WELL HEAD SHALL PENETRATE WELL PUMP FOUNDATION AND TERMINATE INSIDE ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE TYPICAL CONCRETE STAIR 3" THICK SAND BEDDING 4 EQUALSTEPS 7" MAX 12" 12" 8" TYP. PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT, PER 3CD1 #4 BENT BAR @ 16" OC, TYP EACH STEP 24" 18" #4 NOSING BAR, TYP EACH STEP #4 @ 16" OC EACH WAY, MATCH STAIR SLOPE 12" LICENSE NO: DESIGN ENGINEER: SHEETDATE: JOB NO: DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY: OF ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS. 0 1" PHASE: PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS RBT 92894 PPI MWK 4-9-2024 261922024 CD1 11 29 12/3/2024 4:23 PM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1CD1
2CD1
3CD1
4CD1 CD4 1
5CD1
No
12/03/2024 656
Section , Item E

WELL EQUIPMENT ELEVATION
1'-10"
MIN
12"Ø WATER MAIN
TS
8'
8'

WELL EQUIPMENT PLAN
NOTES

1. ALL HOLES WITHIN THE PUMP HEAD MUST BE
SEALED.

2. ALL TUBING SHALL BE INSULATED TO PROTECT
FROM FREEZING.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 1/4" STAINLESS

STEEL TUBING AIR LINE WITH DURO WELL WATER
LEVEL GAUGE (MODEL NO. CA566), OR APPROVEDEQUAL, FOR WATER LEVEL MEASURING. INSTALL AIR LINE TO A DEPTH OF 440 FEET.

4. ABOVE GROUND FITTINGS SHALL BE FLANGED.

5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WATER METER

MANUFACTURER'S UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM

STRAIGHT PIPE LENGTH REQUIREMENTS

MATERIAL LIST

DESCRIPTION
12" FLEXIBLE COUPLING12" TYPE 11 CHECK VALVE
4" CAMLOCK HOSE CONNECTION & 50' HOSE
12" TYPE 1 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HAND WHEEL, FLG X FLG12" BLIND FLANGE 4" TYPE 1 GATE VALVE, FLG X FLG
TYPE 5 PRESSURE GAGE AND TYPE 4 HIGH LOW PRESSURE
SWITCH PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET CD3
ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT - SEE DETAIL 7 ON SHEET CD3
SAMPLE TAP - SEE DETAIL 3 ON SHEET CD3

NOT USED
12" 45° ELBOW FLG.XFLG.12" 45° ELBOW MJ X MJ (RESTRAINED) 6" TYPE 1 BUTTERFLY VALVE, FLG X FLG
12" TEE12" GROOVED COUPLING
TYPE 2 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER - SEE DETAIL 9 ON SHEET CD3 12"Ø DIP CL 350 (WITH MJ RESTRAINED JOINTS)12" x 6" TEE, FLG X FLG12" CROSS, FLG X FLG12" X 6" REDUCER, FLG X FLG12" X 4" REDUCER, FLG X FLG FLUID ENERGY CONTROLS, 10 GAL. SURGE SUPPRESSOR, ,
CARBON STEEL/BUNA-N, PART NO. FS010CB0230, OR APPROVED
EQUAL
CONCRETE PIPE SUPPORT - SEE DETAIL 8 ON SHEET CD36" TYPE 2 GLOBE CONTROL VALVE, FLG X FLG3'x3' DROP INLET PER - SEE DETAIL 10 SHEET CD36" 90° BEND, WITH FINE MESH SCREEN, FLG X FLG 12"Ø DIP FLG X MJ (RESTRAINED)
2"Ø TYPE 2 AIR AND VAC VALVE PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD32"Ø TYPE 1 COMBINATION AIR VALVE PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD3 12"Ø DIP CL 350, FLG X GJ12"Ø DIP CL 350, FLG X FLG12"Ø ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOW METER MCCROMETER ULTRA MAG 5000 WITH BUILT IN VERIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUAL
(SEE SPEC SECTION 40 91 25) (SEE NOTE 5)
SOUND ATTENUATION ENCLOSURE PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET CD4
3/4"Ø HALF COUPLING, PLUGGED, FOR FUTURE CHLORINE
INJECTION. INSTALL 45 DEGREES FROM VERTICAL

CASING VENT

GRAVEL FILL
PIPE

SOUNDING

TUBE, SEE
NOTE 3
CONNECT PRELUBESUPPLY TO 12" DIP
WITH 3/4" TAP &

SHUTOFF BALL
VALVE
3/4"Ø PIPE TO PRE-LUBE ASSEMBLY

STOP COCK& SOLENOIDCONTROL
VALVE

ENCLOSURE
3/4" COPPER PRELUBESUPPLY LINE UNDERGROUND
WITH RISERS AT MAIN ANDAT PUMP BLOCK. PROVIDE ISOLATION

BALL VALVE AT CONNECTION TO PUMPDISCHARGE PIPE

PRELUBE

SOLENOID
VALVE
FG
3/4" HALF COUP.

INSTALL PLUG
3/4" HALF
COUP.

CASING VENT

FG VARIES

CONCRETESTAIRS

CONCRETE
STAIRS
5'
1' MIN.

SEE NOTE 5
1' MIN.

SEE NOTE 5
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

WELL EQUIPPING DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD2
12 29
12/3/2024 11:50 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD2 WELL EQUIPPING DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD2
5 CD1
5 CD1
12/03/2024
5 657
Section , Item E

TYPICAL VACUUM VALVE INSTALLATION
NOTES

1. AIR/VACUUM RELEASE TYPE AND SIZE AS NOTED ON PLANS.

REFER TO SPECIFICATION 40 05 60

2. PIPE AND VALVE SIZE TO BE THE SAME AS AIR/VACUUM
VALVE SIZE.

3. BALL VALVE PER SPECIFICATION 40 05 23 C. BALL VALVES.

AIR/VACUUM VALVE
TYPE 2 BALL VALVE

WELL DISCHARGE

WELDED HALF COUPLING
TEE

GALV STEEL VENT LINE& FITTINGS
16 MESH SCREEN 3' MIN

ABOVE GROUND

TYPICAL PRESSURE GAUGE INSTALLATION
NOTES

1. PRESSURE GAUGE/TRANSMITTER TYPE AS NOTED
ON PLANS. REFER TO SPECIFICATION 40 91 30.

2. ALL PIPE FITTINGS SHALL BE 1/2".

PIPE

THREADED OUTLET

SEE NOTE
TYPE 1 BALL VALVE

PRESSURE GAUGE AND/ORPRESSURE TRANSMITTER

SEE NOTE

CONFIGURATION FOR

PRESSURE

GAUGE/TRANSMITTER W/

PRESSURE SWITCH

THREADED OUTLET

SEE NOTE
TYPE 1 BALL VALVE

HOSE BIBB
2'-0"
1" HOSE BIBB TYPE 4
3 X 4 X 1/4" CHANNEL STIFFENER (GALV.)

RISER SAME SIZE AS HOSE VALVE,
SCH. 80 GALV. STEEL, PAINTED

ATTACH RISER TO STIFFENER
WITH U-BOLT, TYP.

TOP OF AC PAVEMENT

ELEVATION GRADE

FLOOR MOUNTED HOSE RACK

PLAN VIEW
1/2"Ø SST

CA (TYP)
10"
6"AL CS6 x 4.03
1" (TYP)
7 1/2"
3'-0" 9"
1'-6"
9"
1'-0"
1/2"Ø STS BOLT NUT,

AND WASHER (TYP)
AL CS6 X 4.03 (TYP)
1" NON-SHRINK

GROUT (TYP)
(TYP) 1/4 1/2"Ø STS CA (TYP)
NOTES

1. FABRICATE UNITS FROM
1/8" 6061-T6 ALUMINUM=
ALLOY PLATE. USE TYPEA U.O.N. ON DRAWINGS.

TOP OF AC PAVEMENT

ELEVATION GRADE

FLOOR SLAB
C
B
A
9"
1" MIN
NOTE: FOR SUPPORTS IN AREAS

OUTSIDE OF FLOOR SLAB, CONSTRUCT
18"x18"x6" PAD UNDER PIPE SUPPORT.
18"
18"
6"

CAST IRON

PIPE SADDLE

THREADED
PIPE

CAST IRON

ADJUSTING NUT

THREADED
PIPE
1/2" X 5" EXP
(4 REQD)
GROUT
6-#4 BARS
12" LONG

DIMENSIONS
PIPE
SIZE "A" "B"
"C"

MIN MAX
2 1/2" 2 1/2" 1 1/2" 8" 13"
3" 2 1/2" 1 1/2" 8 1/4" 13 1/4"4" 3" 2 1/2" 9 1/4" 14"6" 3" 2 1/2" 10 1/2" 15 1/4"8" 3" 2 1/2" 11 3/4" 16 1/2" 10" 3" 2 1/2" 13 1/2" 18 1/4"12" 3" 2 1/2" 15" 19 3/4"

PIPE SUPPORT
PPNG
3" CLR
NOTE:

BELOW GROUND SURFACE MAY BE
POURED WITHOUT FORM IN 28"DRILLED HOLE.
2" CLR

FIXED PIPE SUPPORT
"D"
3'
18" SQUARE

PER PLANS
PIPE SIZE "D"
4" 1 1/2"
6" 2"8" 2 1/2"
10" 3"12" 3 1/2"
FG

PRESSURE

TRANSMITTER

SENSOR CABLE

STAINLESS STEELSENSING LINE

CONCRETE

PIPE SUPPORT

TYPICAL PRESSURE

TRANSDUCER INSTALLATION

NOT TO SCALE

REFER TO ELECTRICAL
SHEETS

MAIN DISTRIBUTION PIPE
NOTES

1. PRESSURE TRANSMITTER TYPE AND
SIZE AS NOTED ON PLANS. REFER TOSPECIFICATION SECTION 40 91 30.

SITE PIPING
1/4"Ø NON THREADED

SAMPLE TAP COPPER
TUBE
1/4" TAPPED COUPLING
TYPE 2 BALL VALVE
TYPE 1 SAMPLE TAP
3'x 3' DROP INLET
3'-0"
3'-0"
2'-0" 6"
2'-0"

PLAN SECTION A-A
6"

VARIES-SEE PLANS

SD PIPE

SLOPE TO
DRAIN
2'-4"
2'-4"
13 BARS1/4" X 1"

EQUALLY
SPACED
2'-3"
2'-3"

FRAME PLAN

GRATE PLAN
#4 REBAR
@ 12" O.C.
6" EA. WAY
6" 6"
1/4" X 1" X 8" TYP.

BAR ANCHOR (TYP.)
TYP.
∠ 2" X 2" X 1/4"(TYP.)
A
A
TYP.

UTSD
NOTES:_____________________________

1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE DROP INLET

MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH APPROVEDEQUAL PRECAST CONCRETE INLET FG 1'
FG
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD3
13 29
12/3/2024 11:53 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD3 WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD3
2 CD3
3 CD3
4 CD3
5 CD3
6 CD3
7 CD3
8 CD3
9 CD3
10 CD3

NOT USED
12/03/2024 658
Section , Item E

1. THE ACOUSTICAL PUMP ENCLOSURE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A BOOM TRUCK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISASSEMBLE THE ACOUSTICAL PUMP ENCLOSURE DURING INSTALLATION. THE ACOUSTICAL PUMPENCLOSURE SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY RPS INDUSTRIES, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE NOISE REDUCING PERFORMANCE WITH SELECTED WELL PUMP MOTOR. 50 dBA MAXIMUM

ALLOWABLE NOISE LEVEL AT PROPERTY LINES

ACOUSTICAL PUMP ENCLOSURE NOTES
CONNECTION TO EXISTING 10" WATER MAIN

FITTING TABLE
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
12" TEE12" GATE VALVE12" X 10 " REDUCER12" DIP SPOOL FROM WELL 912" BLIND FLANGE10" FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER EXISTING 10" WATER MAIN
1234567
NOTES

1. ALL PIPING AND FITTING JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD4
14 29
12/3/2024 11:54 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD4 WELL EQUIPMENT DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD4
2 CD4

ACOUSTICAL PUMP ENCLOSURE
12/03/2024 659
Section , Item E
⅊

PROPOSED WELL SITE EXISTING LOT
□ □ □ (P) CMU WALL (E) WOOD FENCE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE 2'-0"
VARIES
(E) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TOBE PROTECTED IN PLACE
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE

TO BE REMOVED
⅊

SECTION A-A
(P) AC PAVEMENT SECTION 2%

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

FUTURE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION
FUTURE
⅊

PROPOSED WELL SITE EXISTING LOT
(E) WOOD FENCE TO BE

REMOVED AND REPLACED

WITH (P) CMU BLOCK WALL

SECTION B-B
(P) AC PAVEMENT SECTION
⅊

OFFSITE PROPOSED WELL SITE

0.7%
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) CURB AND
GUTTER
FL
TC

STORM BREAK OVER,
2' WIDE OPENING IN WALL

SECTION D-D
2 CD5

MATCH EXISTING BACK OF

SIDEWALK ELEVATION
⅊

SECTION C-C

OFFSITE PROPOSED WELL SITE
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE

REMOVED AND REPLACED
WITH (P) CMU BLOCK WALL 3'-0"
(P) AC PAVEMENT

SECTION (P) VALLEY GUTTER
3 FOOT VALLEY GUTTER
3'-0"
6"

CONCRETE
1'-6"
2"
#4 @ 6" OC
0 FEET
.5 1
2' GUTTER DRAINAGE CHANNEL
1'-2"
3'-0"
1'-4" 10"
8" 6"
6" 2'-0"
0 FEET
.5 1

EXISTING GROUND EXISTING GROUND
□
□
□ OE OE OE OE OE OE
G
G
G
G
G
LP

UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE

V V V V V V V V V V V V

V V V V

V V V V
C 300.79
TC 300.67
FL 300.22

6.68%
C 300.79
C 300.82
C 300.73
C 300.76
C 301.53
C 301.71
C,ME 300.73
C,ME 300.80
TC 300.72
FL 300.27
TC,ME 300.65
FL,ME 300.21
TC,ME 300.72
FL,ME 300.27

8.04%

0.04%

1.50% 1.56% 0.88%

1.50% 1.68%

0.69%

8.04%

7.98%

1.03%

1.00% 0.00%

1.50%

1.20%

0.20%

0.22%
C 300.86
11' 4' 5.5' 15' 5' 5'
C 301.76
FL 301.59
AC/C 301.76

1.20% 1.20%
4' 5'
4'
5'
3' 3'
2'
G
G
G
G
G
W

UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV
SD
SD
IR

IRR BOX

UE UE UE UE UE
AC/C 300.39
AC/C 300.37
AC/C 300.36
AC/C 300.37
AC/C 300.38 FL 300.20
FL,GB 300.21
TG 300.19
FL 300.20
FL,GB 300.22
C 300.39
C 300.66
C 300.63 C 300.63
C 300.38

0.24%

0.20%

1.20%

0.20%

0.24%

3.24%

2.84% 1.20%

1.20%

0.20%

0.69% FL 300.63
FL 300.63 FL,TC,ME 300.53
FL,TC,ME 300.52
3'
3'

13.26%
□

G G G G
G

UTV UTV UTV UTV

UE UE UE UE
W

W W W W W
WM
12IN DEC

UE UE UE UE UE

V V V V V V V V V V V V
V V
V V
V V
V V
C 300.95
C 300.94
C 300.99
C,ME 301.03
C,ME 300.85
TC,ME 300.86
FL,ME 300.39
C 301.80
C 301.62
C 301.00
C 300.93
C 300.94
C,ME 301.01
C,ME 300.85
TC,ME 300.86
FL,ME 300.38
TC 300.89
FL 300.39
TC 300.88
FL 300.38

3.63%

1.94%

3.28%

0.20%

1.50% 1.50%

1.50% 13.26%

7.95%

0.00%

0.99% 1.50% 1.50%

1.10%
C 300.88 1.50% 6.16%

7.70%

1.20% 1.20% 1.20%
C 300.89 1.50%

0.00%

0.20%

1.57%

0.90% C 301.85 FL 301.68
AC/C 301.85

0.06%

5.5' 4' 11'
5' 5'
4'
5'

4.97'
5'
15'
3' 3'
5'
5'
2'

0.07%

0.07%
2'
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

GRADING DETAILS AND SECTIONS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD5
15 29
12/3/2024 11:58 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD5 GRADING SECTIONS AND DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno 0 2.5 5 10

SCALE IN FEET
A-A
CD5
B-B
CD5
C-C
CD5
D-D
CD5
1 CD5
2 CD5

EX SIDEWALK

EX WATER METER TO BEPROTECTED IN PLACE,

ADJUST TO GRADE

EX CURB AND GUTTER TOBE PROTECTED IN PLACE

PROPOSED AC PLUG
SEE SHEET C2 FOR MORE

INFORMATION

SAWCUT EDGE

WATER MAIN AND SERVICETO BE PROTECT IN PLACE

PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENT

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

SAWCUT EDGE

PROPOSED GATE AND VALLEY

GUTTER PER SEPARATE SHEET

PROPOSED CMU BLOCK

WALL PER SEPARATE SHEET

PROPOSED CMU BLOCK

WALL PER SEPARATE SHEET

EX PROPERTY LINE

EX SIDEWALK

EX SIDEWALK EX SIDEWALK

EX CURB AND GUTTER TO

BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

EX CURB AND GUTTER TOBE PROTECTED IN PLACE

SAWCUT EDGE

PROPOSED CMU BLOCK

WALL PER SEPARATE SHEET PROPOSED CMU BLOCK

WALL PER SEPARATE SHEET

PROPOSED GATE AND VALLEY

GUTTER PER SEPARATE SHEET

EXISTINGPROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENT

TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE

PROPOSED AC PLUG
SEE SHEET C2 FOR MORE

INFORMATION

PROPOSED CMU BLOCK

WALL PER SEPARATE SHEET

MATCH CONCRETE GRADE

AT BACK OF SIDEWALK

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

STORM OVERFLOW

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EX SIDEWALK

EX STORM

DRAIN INLET

E SOUTH AVENUE

STANFORD AVENUE

E SOUTH AVENUE

PROPOSED DRIVE APPROACH
SEE SHEET C2 FOR MORE

INFORMATION

PROPOSED DRIVE APPROACH
SEE SHEET C2 FOR MORE

INFORMATION

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET
SEE SHEET C2 FOR MORE INFORMATION

PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTERPER SEPARATE SHEET, TYP
0 2.5 5 10

SCALE IN FEET
5 CD5
4 CD5
3 CD5 DRIVE APPROACH GRADING DETAIL
0 2.5 5 10

SCALE IN FEET

DRIVE APPROACH GRADING DETAIL GRADING DETAIL

PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTERPER SEPARATE SHEET, TYP

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
12/03/2024 660
Section , Item E

REINFORCEMENT BENDS & SPLICES
12Db
A OR G
Db
HOOK
A OR G
4Db OR
2 1/2" MIN
J
Db
180-DEG 90-DEG
90-DEG 135-DEG 135-DEG
6 Db
H
D
#3 TO #5 6Db
OR 2 1/2" MIN
#6 TO #8 12Db
HOOK
A OR G

DETAILING

DIMENSION
H
D
Db
6 Db OR
2 1/2" MIN
HOOK
A OR G

DETAILING

DIMENSION

DETAILING
DIMENSION Db Db
A
ORG

STIRRUP HOOKS SEISMIC STIRRUP/TIE

HOOK BEND
4Db or
2-1/2" MIN.
12 Db
50Db #6 AND SMALLER
62Db #7-#11
TIE

REINFORCEMENT BENDS

STRAIGHT REBAR SPLICE
(TIE BENDS SIMILAR)
9Db OR
6" MAX.

SPLICE LENGTH / Db

CONCRETE STRENGTH (PSI)
2500 3000 3500 4000 5000
#6 AND SMALLER 63 57 53 50 45
#7-#11 78 72 66 62 56
NOTE

1. SPLICES SHOWN ARE CLASS B SPLICE fy=60ksi
f'c=4ksi. SEE CHART FOR DIFFERENT
CONCRETE STRENGTHS.

2. SPLICES ASSUME THE MODIFICATION
FACTORS OF ACI 318 SECTION 12.2 ARE 1.0FOR OTHER CONDITIONS PROVIDE SPLICELENGTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318.

3. USE THE SPLICE LENGTH GIVEN FOR TOP
BARS WHEN MORE THAN 12" OF CONCRETE IS

CAST BELOW HORIZONTAL BARS IN THE
MEMBER. USE THE SPLICE LENGTH GIVEN FORBOTTOM BARS FOR ALL OTHER CONDITIONS 135° SEISMIC HOOK
SIZE D A OR G ARROX. H
#3 1 1/2" 4" 2 1/2"#4 2" 4 1/2" 3"#5 2 1/2" 5 1/2" 3 3/4"#6 4 1/2" 8" 4 1/2"#7 5 1/4" 9" 5 1/4"#8 6" 10 1/2" 6" 90° 135°
SIZE D A OR G A OR G ARROX. H
#3 1 1/2" 4" 4" 2 1/2"#4 2" 4 1/2" 4 1/2" 3"#5 2 1/2" 6" 5 1/2" 3 3/4"#6 4 1/2" 12" 8" 4 1/2"#7 5 1/4" 14" 9" 5 1/4"#8 6" 16" 10 1/2" 6" DIMENSION OF STANDARD 180° HOOKS,

ALL GRADES

DIMENSION OF
STANDARD 90°

HOOKS, ALL GRADES

SIZE D J A OR G D A OR G
#3 2 1/4" 3" 5" 2 1/4" 6"#4 3" 4" 6" 3" 8"#5 3 3/4" 5" 7" 3 3/4" 10"#6 4 1/2" 6" 8" 4 1/2" 12"#7 5 1/4" 7" 10" 5 1/4" 14"#8 6" 8" 11" 6" 16"#9 9 1/2" 11 3/4" 15" 9 1/2" 19" #10 10 3/4" 13 1/4" 17" 10 3/4" 22"
#11 12" 14 3/4" 19" 12" 24"
#14 18 1/4" 21 3/4" 27" 18 1/4" 31"#18 24" 28 1/2" 36" 24" 41" Db = (1) BAR DIAMETERD = FINISHED INSIDE BEND DIA.D = 6Db FOR #3-#8D = 8Db FOR #9-#11D = 10Db FOR #14 AND #18 Db = (1) BAR DIAMETERD = FINISHED INSIDE BEND DIA.D = 6Db FOR #3-#8D = 8Db FOR #9-#11D = 10Db FOR #14 AND #18 D-4Db
(TYP)
D
D

DETAILING

DIMENSION

DETAILING

DIMENSION
BEAM
℄
BEAM
℄
BEAM
℄
4" MIN
0 FEET
.5 1

TYPICAL CMU WALL
(P) WELL SITE
(E) LOT
6"x8"x16" CMU BLOCK WALL
2'-6"
1'-3"
⅊
(P) VALLEY GUTTER, WHEREOCCURS ON PLANS
(P) AC PAVEMENT SECTION
#5 @ 32" O.C. VERTICALAND HORIZONTAL BARS
CONT. FTG. w/ (3)
#5 LONG. BARS

BENT BARS TOMATCH WALL
VERT. REINF'G.

LAP w/ WALL

REINF'G
2" MIN.
8'-0" MAX
2' MAX
6"
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

STRUCTURAL DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD6
16 29
12/3/2024 11:58 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD6
2 CD6
12/03/2024 661
Section , Item E
12 2

MATERIAL LIST
ITEM No. MATL SIZE
1 ASTM-A500 Gr.B HSS-4x4x
1 4
2 ASTM-A36 PL-10"x 10"x 1
2" 3 ASTM-A36 PL-6"x 10"x 1
2" 4 ASTM-A992 W6X15
5 ASTM-A1011 Gr.55 C PURLIN 10"x 2
1 2"x 12GA
6 ASTM-A1011 Gr.55 Z GIRT/PURLIN 10"x 2
1 2"x 12GA
7 26-GA PBR PANEL PAINTED, RIBBED STEEL PANEL
8 ASTM-A325
3 4" BOLTS, NUTS & WASHERS
9 ASTM-A325 1" BOLT x 11
1 2" LG
10 ASTM-A36 PL 1
4"x 3"SQ
TYP.

MCC
MCC
MCC

NORTH ELEVATION

TRANSVERSE SECTION

TYPICAL COLUMN ANCHOR BOLT

CONCRETE
SLAB
NTS
4 HOLES 1
1 8"Ø

BASE PLATE PLAN VIEW
NTS

PART SECTION A

PARTIAL

ROOF PLAN
4 HOLES 7
8"Ø
TYP
COLUMN

TO BEAM

CONNECTION
#4 REBAR @ 6" O.C.

EACH WAY, TOP & BOTTOM
#4 TIES @ 24" O.C. (TYP.)
NOTE
FACILITY SHALL BE PAINTED SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6106 KILIM BEIGE

MCC PAD & SUN SHADE
9' CLEAR
(VERIFY w/ FINAL

EQUIPMENT SELECTION)

PARTIAL
FDN. PLAN
1 4
1 4
1 4" 1.75" THICK MCC PAD TO EXTEND

1.75" BEYOND MCC ALL AROUND

1.75" THICK MCC PAD TO EXTEND

1.75" BEYOND MCC ALL AROUND
INSTALL ANCHOR BOLTS.
4 IN EACH PANEL
LICENSE NO:DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

SHADE STRUCTURE DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD7
17 29
12/3/2024 11:59 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD7 SHADE STRUCTURE DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD7
12/03/2024 662
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

CHAIN LINK GATE DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD8
18 29
12/3/2024 11:59 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD8 CHAIN LINK GATE DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD8
2 CD8
12/03/2024 663
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

CITY STANDARD DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD9
19 29
12/3/2024 11:59 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD9 CITY STANDARD DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
1 CD9
2 CD9
3 CD9
4 CD9
5 CD9
6 CD9
12/03/2024 NEPTUNE MACH 10 R900I OR EQUAL,
9 9 9
664
Section , Item E
LICENSE NO:

DESIGN ENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOB NO:

DRAFTED BY: CHECKED BY:

ORIGINAL SCALE SHOWN IS ONE
INCH. ADJUST SCALE FOR
REDUCED OR ENLARGED PLANS.
0 1"
PHASE:

PROJECT NO:

WELL 9

CITY OF FOWLER

FRESNO COUNTY, CA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

CITY STANDARD DETAILS
RBT92894

PPI MWK
4-9-2024261922024
CD10
20 29
12/3/2024 11:59 AM G:\Fowler_City of-2619\261922024-Water Well No. 9\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\04_Civil_Details\CD10 CITY STANDARD DETAILS.dwg -Renee Tiscareno

BID SET
DECEMBER 2024
DATE No. REVISION BY
COPYRIGHT 2024 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. In the event of unauthorized reuse of these plans by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.'s legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
455 W FIR AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93611-9166
PHONE (559) 449-2700
FAX (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
3 CD10
2 CD10
1 CD10
4 CD10
#10 SOLID COPPER

Fowler City CouncilMay 6, 2025

Fowler City Council
May 6, 2025