Agenda packet — Fowler City Council, December 2, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

Merced Avenue
Northbound Westbound
Sumner Avenue
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
Fowler Avenue
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
335
Section 10, Item E
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 3 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 65 0 3 0 0 32 43 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 2 0 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 79 0 7 0 0 41 63 7 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 9 0 35 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 107 0 8 0 0 57 64 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 3 0 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 148 0 6 0 0 66 29 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 4 1 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 166 0 2 0 0 68 12 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 7 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 146 0 5 0 0 111 49 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 2 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 66 0 3 0 0 76 44 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 3 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 57 0 2 0 0 40 24 5 TOTAL 0 33 2 248 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 834 0 36 0 0 491 328 36 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 8 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 92 0 3 0 0 94 68 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 12 0 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 91 0 5 0 0 79 47 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 12 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 72 0 3 0 0 87 51 6 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 12 1 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 100 0 2 0 0 82 51 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 7 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 61 0 3 0 0 95 61 3 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 9 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 102 0 2 0 0 78 28 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 10 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 94 0 5 0 0 84 32 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 10 0 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 101 0 1 0 0 71 33 2 TOTAL 0 80 1 184 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 713 0 24 0 0 670 371 18 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 23 2 143 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 567 0 21 0 0 302 154 17 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 44 1 90 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 355 0 13 0 0 342 217 11 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.908 3.2% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.898 2.4% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.889 0.947
AM PM
0 0 154 217
143 179 302 342
355 567 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.713 0.863 PHF

0.84 0 23 2 143 AM

0.912 0 44 1 90 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced Avenue
Fresno
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 Clear

36.6269
-119.6840

Page 1 of 3 ends

Merced Avenue
Northbound Westbound
Merced Avenue
SR 99 NB On-Ramp
SR 99 NB Off-Ramp
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
337
Section 10, Item E
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 9 24 0 0 33 2 16 3 0 21 2 44 18 0 64 18 25 7 0 50 168 07:15 AM 15 25 0 0 40 2 29 2 1 34 0 68 19 0 87 21 44 10 2 77 238 07:30 AM 13 33 3 0 49 0 41 5 1 47 3 72 35 0 110 20 52 17 0 89 295 07:45 AM 18 31 2 1 52 6 53 4 0 63 11 110 20 0 141 32 82 12 1 127 383 Total 55 113 5 1 174 10 139 14 2 165 16 294 92 0 402 91 203 46 3 343 1084 08:00 AM 17 38 2 0 57 1 97 3 0 101 5 60 27 0 92 32 104 9 1 146 396 08:15 AM 22 28 1 0 51 6 97 6 0 109 3 59 21 0 83 43 87 7 4 141 384 08:30 AM 6 34 5 0 45 1 57 7 3 68 4 43 22 0 69 28 51 8 0 87 269 08:45 AM 11 29 3 0 43 3 36 3 0 42 1 27 18 0 46 26 33 9 0 68 199 Total 56 129 11 0 196 11 287 19 3 320 13 189 88 0 290 129 275 33 5 442 1248 *** BREAK ***
04:00 PM 11 69 4 1 85 1 65 7 1 74 4 47 32 0 83 20 60 11 0 91 333 04:15 PM 15 62 4 0 81 2 60 6 1 69 3 44 26 0 73 22 49 8 1 80 303 04:30 PM 12 77 2 0 91 3 51 4 1 59 4 37 28 0 69 24 43 16 1 84 303 04:45 PM 9 68 3 0 80 1 42 6 1 50 2 50 24 0 76 33 41 11 0 85 291 Total 47 276 13 1 337 7 218 23 4 252 13 178 110 0 301 99 193 46 2 340 1230 05:00 PM 9 77 5 0 91 3 64 5 2 74 3 49 33 0 85 23 52 6 0 81 331 05:15 PM 12 80 5 0 97 0 44 6 0 50 9 39 21 0 69 22 66 2 1 91 307 05:30 PM 11 67 2 0 80 5 66 6 1 78 11 45 22 0 78 29 60 5 2 96 332 05:45 PM 6 37 5 0 48 0 50 8 0 58 1 43 26 0 70 27 47 3 0 77 253 Total 38 261 17 0 316 8 224 25 3 260 24 176 102 0 302 101 225 16 3 345 1223 Grand Total 196 779 46 2 1023 36 868 81 12 997 66 837 392 0 1295 420 896 141 13 1470 4785 Apprch % 19.2 76.1 4.5 0.2 3.6 87.1 8.1 1.2 5.1 64.6 30.3 0 28.6 61 9.6 0.9 Total % 4.1 16.3 1 0 21.4 0.8 18.1 1.7 0.3 20.8 1.4 17.5 8.2 0 27.1 8.8 18.7 2.9 0.3 30.7 JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
339
Section 10, Item E
File Name : 01 Merced at GSB
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2025
Page No : 2

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 13 33 3 0 49 0 41 5 1 47 3 72 35 0 110 20 52 17 0 89 295 07:45 AM 18 31 2 1 52 6 53 4 0 63 11 110 20 0 141 32 82 12 1 127 383 08:00 AM 17 38 2 0 57 1 97 3 0 101 5 60 27 0 92 32 104 9 1 146 396 08:15 AM 22 28 1 0 51 6 97 6 0 109 3 59 21 0 83 43 87 7 4 141 384 Total Volume 70 130 8 1 209 13 288 18 1 320 22 301 103 0 426 127 325 45 6 503 1458 % App. Total 33.5 62.2 3.8 0.5 4.1 90 5.6 0.3 5.2 70.7 24.2 0 25.2 64.6 8.9 1.2 PHF .795 .855 .667 .250 .917 .542 .742 .750 .250 .734 .500 .684 .736 .000 .755 .738 .781 .662 .375 .861 .920

GOLDEN STATE
MERCED
MERCED

GOLDEN STATE
Right
70 Thru
130
Left
8 Peds
1 Out In Total
359 209 568
Right
13 Thru
288
Left
18 Peds
1 Out Total In
355 320 675
Left
103
Thru
301
Right
22 Peds
0 Out In Total
275 426 701
Left
45 Thru
325
Right
127
Peds
6 Total Out In
461 503 964
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
340
Section 10, Item E
File Name : 01 Merced at GSB
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2025
Page No : 3

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 9 68 3 0 80 1 42 6 1 50 2 50 24 0 76 33 41 11 0 85 291 05:00 PM 9 77 5 0 91 3 64 5 2 74 3 49 33 0 85 23 52 6 0 81 331 05:15 PM 12 80 5 0 97 0 44 6 0 50 9 39 21 0 69 22 66 2 1 91 307 05:30 PM 11 67 2 0 80 5 66 6 1 78 11 45 22 0 78 29 60 5 2 96 332 Total Volume 41 292 15 0 348 9 216 23 4 252 25 183 100 0 308 107 219 24 3 353 1261 % App. Total 11.8 83.9 4.3 0 3.6 85.7 9.1 1.6 8.1 59.4 32.5 0 30.3 62 6.8 0.8 PHF .854 .913 .750 .000 .897 .450 .818 .958 .500 .808 .568 .915 .758 .000 .906 .811 .830 .545 .375 .919 .950

GOLDEN STATE
MERCED
MERCED

GOLDEN STATE
Right
41 Thru
292
Left
15 Peds
0 Out In Total
216 348 564
Right
9 Thru
216
Left
23 Peds
4 Out Total In
259 252 511
Left
100
Thru
183
Right
25 Peds
0 Out In Total
422 308 730
Left
24 Thru
219
Right
107
Peds
3 Total Out In
357 353 710
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
341
Section 10, Item E
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 3 2 0 0 45 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 17 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 3 4 0 1 52 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 7 4 0 0 65 0 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 32 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 9 4 0 1 67 0 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 12 2 0 1 68 0 2 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 19 3 0 0 46 0 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 5 5 0 0 29 0 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 5 4 0 1 26 0 2 TOTAL 0 147 0 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 510 63 28 0 4 398 0 13 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 19 2 0 1 58 0 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 20 1 0 1 48 0 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 11 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 13 3 0 0 40 0 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 16 2 0 2 41 0 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 17 1 0 3 44 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 7 1 0 0 38 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 21 0 0 0 36 0 4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 16 1 0 1 27 0 1 TOTAL 0 100 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 689 129 11 0 8 332 0 13 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 108 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 47 13 0 2 246 0 10 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 46 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371 68 8 0 4 187 0 7 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.963 3.4% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.918 2.3% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.946 0.772
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 246 187
371 265 2 4
68 47 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.899 0.809 PHF

0.843 0 108 0 10 AM

0.838 0 46 0 11 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Fowler Ave
Northbound Westbound
Fowler Ave
Fresno St
Turning Movement Report
Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue
Fresno
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 Clear

36.6243
-119.6827
342
Section 10, Item E
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 45 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 38 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 51 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 53 4 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 64 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 41 3 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 69 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 41 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 68 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 47 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 57 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 28 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 47 5 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 27 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 399 0 49 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 335 27 0 0 0 0 0
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 58 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 60 2 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 48 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 41 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 65 4 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 43 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 47 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 58 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 37 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 28 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 39 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 339 0 37 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 439 11 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 252 0 30 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 173 13 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 190 0 21 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 242 8 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.986 4.4% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.961 2.9% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.943 0.842
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
139 93 0 0
242 173 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF

0.904 0 252 0 30 AM

0.879 0 190 0 21 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

SR 99 SB On-ramp
Northbound Westbound
Fowler Ave
Fowler Avenue
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 Southbound On-Ramp / Fowler Avenue
Fresno
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 Clear

36.6237
-119.6822
344
Section 10, Item E
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 Southbound On-Ramp / Fowler Avenue 36.6237
Fresno -119.6822
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
0 Fowler Ave SR 99 SB On-ramp
Fowler Avenue Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
345
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | C
(559) 570-8991
Appendix C: Traffic Modeling
346
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Base Year 2019 plus Project
Fowler Convenience Market
3 6
8 8
97 121
31 32
363
Sumner
ner
135
40 70
149
969
1161
Fowler/99
27 3
2 58
3120
Merced Merced
553
186
427
196
4959
2128
Fowler/9
299 237 2604
Merc Mer ed ced
284
138
216
154
2706
1629
SR 99
4890
3742
49782
Golden Sta
734
525
5184
Merc M
ed erced
284
138
216
154
2706
1629
Mer M
ced erced
278
135
208
146
2585
1532
Golden Sta
58 1
7 8
9930
Merce Me d
rced
278
135
208
146
2585
1532
Golden Sta 67
12 0
34 9392
Merced Merced
182
12 154
126
1896
1404
Golden Sta 757
554
5424
Merc Merced
ed
185
148
152
153
1776
1525 Merced Merced
185
148
152
153
1776
1525
Merc M
ed erced
185
148
152
153
1776
1525
347
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Base Year 2019 plus Project
Fowler Convenience Market
0 0
0 0
0 6
9 8
15 1
3 121
183
191
153
147
1768
1760
SR 99
3156
4441
4540
Fresno
Fresno
0 5
3 2
14 13
Fowler Fowler 350
350
339
291
3420
3322
Fowler 16
184
1674
Fowler/9 70
9 83
761
Fowler 237
26 2436
Fres Fr no esno
9 0
7 0
105
0 Fowler
Fowler 227
235
259
205
2330
2224 Fowler 246 211 2295 Fowler 235 205 2224
Fowler/99
10 7
70 Fowler 235
205
2 24
Fowler/9
70 9
83 761
Fowler 235
205
2224
Fowler 81
/99
89 832
Fowler/9
78 68
851 SR 99
4968
3810
50632
Fresno
Fresno
19 6
22 8
226
113
348
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Base Year 2019 plus Project - Select Zone
Fowler Convenience Market
0 0
2 2
31 41
0 0
0 Sumner
ner
9 7
8 10
87 96
Fowler/99
60 4
5 8
15 Merced Merced
120
110
96 71
1180
980
Fowler/9
45 46 461
Merc Mer ed ced
75 75
50 57
719
709
SR 99
0 0
0 Golden Sta
20 12
254
Merc M
ed erced
75 75
50 57
719
709
Mer M
ced erced
75 75
48 56
677
678
Golden Sta 21
2 2
0 01
Merce Me d
rced
75 75
48 56
677
678
Golden Sta 3
1 2
6 35
Merced Merced
42 54
32 36
4 2
47 Golden Sta 24
8 190
Merc Merced
ed
18 33
23 23
252
223 Merced Merced
18 3
23 23
252
2 3
Merc M
ed erced
18 33
23 23
252
223
349
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Base Year 2019 plus Project - Select Zone
Fowler Convenience Market
0 0
0 0
0 6
9 8
15 1
3 121
183
191
153
147
1768
1760
SR 9
0 9
0 0
Fresno
Fresno
0 5
3 2
14 13
Fowler Fowler 179
127
127
106
1582
1276
Fowler 24
11 163
Fowler/9 32
9 36
329
Fowler 5
4 6
49 7
2 Fres Fr no esno
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fowler
Fowler 56
12 47
20 492
179 Fowler 1220 179 Fowler 1220 179
Fowler/99
0 0
0 Fowler 12
20 179
Fowler/9
32 9
36 329
Fowler 12
20 179
Fowler 32
/99
36 329
Fowler/9
35 14
271 SR 99
35 14
271
Fresno
Fresno
9 6
15 8
121
113
350
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project
Fowler Convenience Market
12 11
16 15
145
163
33 39
386
Sumner
ner
76 47
64 118
968
1267
Fowler/99
28 2
4 46
3483
Merced Merced
469
195
371
26 4892
26 1
Fowler/9
165 192 2441
Merc Mer ed ced
346
178
2 1
205
3045
2077
SR 99
6256
5035
76905
Golden Sta
2 42
1 78
10261
Merced Merced
346
178
221
205
3045
2077
Mer M
ced erced
335
166
206
189
2882
1932
Golden Sta
86 20
8 1
43 229
Mer M
ced erced
335
166
206
189
2882
1932
Golden Sta 92
20 3
29 1
549
Merced Merced
259
14 186
15 2257
1627
Golden Sta 2263
1203
10610
Merc M
ed erced
250
157
169
163
2026
174
Merc M
ed erced
250
157
169
163
2026
1744
Merc M
ed erced
250
157
169
163
2026
1744
351
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project
Fowler Convenience Market
0 0
0 0
17 1
14 145
135
189
183
150
148
1736
1746
SR 99
4606
6232
7606
Fresno
Fresno
0 0
3 0
14 19
Fowler Fowler 384
344
358
272
4272
3319
Fowler 191
196
2 78
Fowler/99
108
98 1191
Fowler 2
2 9
93 3469
Fresno
Fresno
27 0
6 0
188
0 Fowler
Fowler 273
227
287
199
3281
2336 Fowler 244 199 2491 Fowler 227 199 2336
Fowler/99
17 0
154
Fowler 2
7 19
2336
Fowler/99
108
98 1191
Fowler 227
199
2336
Fowler/99 125
9 1
8 345
SR 99
Fowler/99
59 102
1 78
SR 99
6315
5137
78083
Fresno
Fresno
44 0
20 11
324
145
352
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project - Select Zone
Fowler Convenience Market
6 4
8 6
50 52
0 0
0 Sumner
ner
0 15
3 4
54 65
Fowler/99
58 3
5 7
03 Merced Merced
140
87 95
82 1145
961
Fowler/9
34 37 421
Merc Mer ed ced
106
75 58
61 724
696
SR 99
0 0
0 Golden Sta
20 19
2 9
Merced Merced
106
75 58
61 724
696
Mer M
ced erced
102
69 53
53 672
646
Golden Sta 13
2 1
1 90
Mer M
ced erced
102
69 53
53 672
646
Golden Sta 32
9 190
Merced Merced
70 56
4 33
483
456
Golden Sta 27
24 207
Merc M
ed erced
42 36
20 14
275
227 Merc M
ed erced
42 36
20 14
275
227
Merc M
ed erced
42 36
20 14
275
227
353
Section 10, Item E
(Licensed to JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc)
AM, PM and Daily Trips
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project - Select Zone
Fowler Convenience Market
0 0
0 0
17 1
14 145
135
189
183
150
148
1736
1746
SR 9
0 9
0 0
Fresno
Fresno
0 0
3 0
14 19
Fowler Fowler 145
155
122
99 1518
1210
Fowler 12
19 2 1
Fowler/9 22
9 32
306
Fowler 3
5 4
1 526
Fresno
Fresno
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fowler
Fowler 34
38 51
26 526
228 Fowler 3826 228 Fowler 3826 228
Fowler/99
0 0
0 Fowler 38
26 2
8 Fowler/9
22 9
32 306
Fowler 38
26 228
Fowler 2
/99
32 306
SR 99
Fowler/99
12 21
265
SR 99
12 21
265
Fresno
Fresno
17 0
14 11
135
145
354
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | D
(559) 570-8991
Appendix D: Methodology
355
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-1
Levels of Service Methodology
The description and procedures for calculating capacity and level of service (LOS) are found in the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The HCM 7th Edition represents the research on capacity and quality of service for transportation facilities.

Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience.

Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level of service (LOS), from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each LOS represents a range of operating conditions and the driver’s perception of these conditions. Safety is not included in the measures that establish an LOS.

Intersection Levels of Service
One of the more important elements limiting and often interrupting the flow of traffic on a highway is the intersection. Flow on an interrupted facility is usually dominated by points of fixed operation such as traffic signals, stop signs and yield signs.

Signalized Intersections
LOS can be characterized for the entire intersection, each intersection approach and each lane group.

Control delay alone is used to characterize LOS for the entire intersection or an approach. Control delay and volume-to-capacity ratio are used to characterize LOS for a lane group. Delay quantifies the increase in travel time due to traffic signal control. It is also a surrogate measure of driver discomfort and fuel consumption. The volume-to-capacity ratio quantifies the degree to which a phase’s capacity is utilized by a lane group. A description of LOS for signalized intersections is found in Table A-1. 356
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-2
Table A-1: Signalized Intersection LOS Description (Motorized Vehicle Mode) Level
of
Service
Description
Average
Control
Delay
(Seconds
per Vehicle)
A
Operations with a control delay of 10 seconds/vehicle or less and a volume-to-capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is really low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If it’s due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. ≤10
B
Operations with control delay between 10.1 to 20.0 seconds/vehicle and a volume-tocapacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-tocapacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A.
>10.0 to

20.0 C
Operations with average control delays between 20.1 to 35.0 seconds/vehicle and a volume-to-capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio no greater than 1.0, the progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping.
>20 to 35
D
Operations with control delay between 35.1 to 55.0 seconds/vehicle and a volume-tocapacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-tocapacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long.

Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >35 to 55
E
Operations with control delay between 55.1 to 80.0 seconds/vehicle and a volume-tocapacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-tocapacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent.
>55 to 80
F
Operations with unacceptable control delay exceeding 80.0 seconds/vehicle and a volume-to-capacity ratio greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue.
>80
Note: Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition
All-Way Stop Controlled Intersections
All-way stop controlled intersections are common in the United States. They are characterized by having all approaches controlled by stop sign without any street having priority. Streets intersecting at all-way stop controlled intersections can be public or private. The intersection analysis boundaries for an all-way stop controlled intersection are assumed to be those of an isolated intersection, no upstream or downstream effects are accounted for in analysis.
357
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-3
Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections
Two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections are also common in the United States. A typical configuration is a four-leg intersection in which one street, the major street, is uncontrolled and the other street, the minor street, is controlled by stop signs. The other typical intersection is a three-leg intersection in which a single minor street approach is controlled by a stop sign.

For the analysis of the motorized vehicle mode, the methodology addresses special circumstances that may exist at two-way stop controlled intersections including two-stage gap acceptance, approaches with shared lanes, the presence of upstream traffic signals and flared approaches for minor-street rightturning vehicles. Table A-2 provides a description of LOS at unsignalized intersections.

Table A-2: Unsignalized Intersection LOS Description (Motorized Vehicle Mode) Control Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) LOS by Volume-to-Capacity Ratio v/c ≤ 1.0 v/c > 1.0
≤10 A F
>10 to 15 B F
>15 to 25 C F
>25 to 35 D F
>35 to 50 E F
>50 F F
Note: Source: HCM 7th Edition, Exhibit 21-8.

Roundabout Controlled Intersections
Roundabouts are intersections with a generally circular shape, characterized by yield on entry and circulation around a central island. Roundabouts have been used successfully throughout the world and are being used increasingly in the United States, especially since 1990. Intersection analysis models generally fall into two categories: regression models and analytical models. Regression models use field data to develop statistically derived relationships between geometric features and performance measures such as capacity and delay. Analytical models are based on traffic flow theory combined with field measures of driver behavior, resulting in an analytical formulation of the relationship of driver behavior, resulting in an analytical formulation of the relationship between those field measures and performance measures such as capacity and delay. Table A-3 provides a description of LOS at roundabout intersections.

Table A-3: Roundabout Intersection Level of Service Description (Automobile Mode) Control Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) LOS by Volume-to-Capacity Ratio v/c ≤ 1.0 v/c > 1.0
≤10 A F
>10 to 15 B F
>15 to 25 C F
>25 to 35 D F
>35 to 50 E F
>50 F F
Note: Source: HCM 7th Edition, Exhibit 22-8.
358
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-4
Segment Levels of Service
Segments are portions of roads without any interruption of flow. These typically include basic freeway segments, multilane highway segments, freeway weaving segments, freeway merge and diverge segments, two-lane highway segments and urban street segments.

Urban Street Segments (Motorized Vehicle Mode)
The term “urban street segments” refers to two elements that are found: points and segments. A point is the boundary between links and is represented by an intersection or ramp terminal. A link is a length of roadway between two points. A link and its boundary are referred to as a segment. A signalized intersection is always used to define a boundary. Only intersections, or ramp terminals, in which the segment through volumes is uncontrolled can exist along the segment. A midsegment traffic control signal provided for the exclusive use of pedestrians should not be used to define a segment boundary.

Chapter 18 of the Highway Capacity Manual categorizes each LOS as follows:

LOS A describes primarily free-flow operation. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Travel speeds exceed 80 percent of the base free flow speed (FFS) and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than

1.0. LOS B describes reasonably unimpeded operation. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and control delay at the boundary intersections is not significant. The travel speed is between 67 and 80 percent of the base FFS and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than

1.0. LOS C describes stable operations. The ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock location may be more restricted than at LOS B. Longer queues at the boundary intersections may contribute to lower travel speeds. The travel speed is between 50 and 67 percent of the base FFS and the volume-tocapacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

LOS D indicates a less stable condition in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. This operation may be due to adverse signal progression, high volumes or inappropriate signal timing at the boundary intersections. The travel speed is between 40 and 50 percent of the base FFS and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

LOS E is characterized as an unstable operation and has significant delay. Such operations may be due to some combination of adverse progression, high volume and inappropriate signal timing at the boundary intersections. The travel speed is between 30 and 40 percent of the base FFS and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

LOS F is characterized by flow at extremely low speed. Congestion is likely occurring at the boundary intersections, as indicated by high delay and extensive queuing. The travel speed is 30 percent or less of the base FFS or the volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. 359
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-5
Urban Street Segments LOS
Two performance measures are used to characterize vehicular LOS for a given direction of travel along an urban street segment. One measure is travel speed for through vehicles. This speed reflects the factors that influence running time along the link and the delay uncured by through vehicles at the boundary intersections. The second measures Is the volume-to-capacity ratio for the through movements at the downstream boundary intersection. These performance measures indicate the degree of mobility provided by the segment. Table A-4 provides a description of LOS for Urban Street Segments.

Table A-4: Urban Street Segment Levels of Service (Motorized Vehicle Mode) LOS Travel Speed Threshold by Base Free-Flow Speed (miles/hour) Volume-to55 50 45 40 35 30 25 Capacity Ratio A >44 >40 >36 >32 >28 >24 >20
≤ 1.0
B >37 >34 >30 >27 >23 >20 >17
C >28 >25 >23 >20 >18 >15 >13
D >22 >20 >18 >16 >14 >12 >10
E >17 >15 >14 >12 >11 >9 >8
F ≤17 ≤15 ≤14 ≤12 ≤11 ≤9 ≤8
F Any > 1.0
Note: a = Volume-to-capacity ratio of through movement at downstream boundary intersection.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition, Exhibit 18-1.

Basic Freeway and Multilane Highway Segments
Segments of multilane highways and basic freeways outside the influence of merging maneuvers, diverging maneuvers, weaving maneuvers, or signalized intersections define LOS by density. Density describes a motorist's proximity to other vehicles and is related to a motorist's freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream. Chapter 12 of the Highway Capacity Manual categorizes each LOS as follows:

LOS A describes free-flow operations. FFS prevails on the freeway or multilane highway, and vehicles are almost completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. The effects of incidents or point breakdowns are easily absorbed.

LOS B represents reasonably free-flow operations, and FFS on the freeway or multilane highway is maintained. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and the general level of physical and psychological comfort provided to drivers is still high. The effects of minor incidents are still easily absorbed.

LOS C provides for flow with speeds near the FFS of the freeway or multilane highway. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted, and lane changes require more care and vigilance on the part of the driver. Minor incidents may still be absorbed, but the local deterioration in service quality will be significant. Queues may be expected to form behind any significant blockages.

LOS D is the level at which speeds begin to decline with increasing flows, with density increasing more quickly. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is seriously limited, and drivers experience reduced physical and psychological comfort levels. Even minor incidents can be expected to create queuing, because the traffic stream has little space to absorb disruptions. 360
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-6
LOS E describes operation at or near capacity. Operations on the freeway or multilane highway at this level are highly volatile because there are virtually no usable gaps within the traffic stream, leaving little room to maneuver within the traffic stream. Any disruption to the traffic stream, such as vehicles entering from a ramp or an access point or a vehicle changing lanes, can establish a disruption wave that propagates throughout the upstream traffic stream. Toward the upper boundary of LOS E, the traffic stream has no ability to dissipate even the most minor disruption, and any incident can be expected to produce a serious breakdown and substantial queuing. The physical and psychological comfort afforded to drivers is poor.

LOS F describes unstable flow. Such conditions exist within queues forming behind bottlenecks.

Breakdowns occur for a number of reasons:
• Traffic incidents can temporarily reduce the capacity of a short segment so that the number of vehicles arriving at a point is greater than the number of vehicles that can move through it. • Points of recurring congestion, such as merge or weaving segments and lane drops, experience very high demand in which the number of vehicles arriving is greater than the number of vehicles that can be discharged.
• In analyses using forecast volumes, the projected flow rate can exceed the estimated capacity of a given location.

Basic Freeway
Basic Freeway segments generally have four to eight lanes (in both directions) and posted speed limits between 50 and 75 mi/hr. The median type depends on right-of-way constraints and other factors. The performance measures include capacity, free flow speed, demand and volume-to-capacity ratio, space mean speed, average density and LOS. The following performance measures are evaluated for each segment: capacity, FFS, demand-to-capacity or volume-to-capacity ratios, space mean average, average density, travel time, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle hours of travel and vehicle hours of delay. Table A-5 provides a description of LOS for Basic Freeway Segments.

Multilane Highway
Multilane Highway segments generally have four to six lanes (in both directions) and posted speed limits between 40 and 55 mi/hr. These highways may be divided, undivided or divided by a two-way left-turn lane. The performance measures include capacity, free flow speed, demand and volume-to-capacity ratio, space mean speed, average density and LOS. The following performance measures are evaluated for each segment: capacity, FFS, demand-to-capacity or volume-to-capacity ratios, space mean average, average density, travel time, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle hours of travel and vehicle hours of delay.

Table A-5 provides a description of LOS for Multilane Highway Segments. 361
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
(559) 570-8991
App | D-7
Table A-5: Basic Freeway and Multilane Highway Segment Level of Service Description Level of Service Density (Passenger Cars per Mile per Lane) Urban Rural
A ≤11 ≤6
B >11 to 18 >6 to 14
C >18 to 26 >14 to 22
D >26 to 35 >22 to 29
E >35 to 45 >29 to 39
F >45 or Demand Exceeds Capacity >39 or Demand Exceeds Capacity Note: Source: HCM 7th Edition, Exhibit 10-6.

Two-Lane Highway Segments
Two-Lane Highways generally have one lane per direction. The single lane in each direction may be supplemented with passing lanes, truck climbing lanes, turnouts or pullouts. If allowed, passing maneuvers are limited by the availability of gaps in the opposing traffic stream and by the availability of sufficient sight distance for a driver to discern the approach of an opposing vehicle safely. A principal measure of LOS is average speed, percent followers and follower density. Chapter 15 of the Highway Capacity Manual categorizes each LOS as follows:

At LOS A, motorists experience operating speeds near the posted speed limit and little difficulty in passing. Platooning is minimal and follower density is very low.

At LOS B through LOS D, represent gradations between the conditions for LOS A and LOS E.

At LOS E, speeds may still be reasonable, but platooning is significant and follower density is high.

Passing, if allowed is essentially impossible.

LOS F exists whenever demand flow in one or both directions exceeds the segment's capacity. When demand exceeds capacity, it is expected that there will be a reduction in the capacity at the bottleneck.

Two-Lane Highway
The performance measures include average speed, FFS and follower density. The LOS output is calculated for an establish segment boundary that includes consistent terrain, lane widths, shoulder widths, facility classification and demand flow rate. Table A-6 provides a description of LOS for Two-Lane Highway Segments.

Table A-6: Two-Lane Highway Segment Level of Service Description LOS
Follower Density (Followers per Mile per Lane)
Higher-Speed Highways
Posted Speed Limit ≥ 50 miles per hour
Lower-Speed Highways
Posted Speed Limit < 50 miles per hour
A ≤2.0 ≤2.5
B >2.0 to 4.0 >2.5 to 5.0
C >4.0 to 8.0 >5.0 to 10.0
D >8.0 to 12.0 >10.0 to 15.0
E >12.0 >15.0
Note: Source: HCM 7th Edition, Exhibit 15-6.
362
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | E
(559) 570-8991
Appendix E: Existing Traffic Conditions
363
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Existing AM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.6
Intersection LOS D
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 95 15 7 0 333 0 226 29 216 104 0 Future Vol, veh/h 209 95 15 7 0 333 0 226 29 216 104 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 235 107 17 8 0 374 0 254 33 243 117 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 31.1 27.3 23.5 19.9

HCM LOS D D C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 2% 66% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 89% 0% 30% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 11% 98% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 255 340 319 216 104
LT Vol 0 7 209 216 0
Through Vol 226 0 95 0 104
RT Vol 29 333 15 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 287 382 358 243 117
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.627 0.738 0.759 0.583 0.264
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.879 6.955 7.624 8.645 8.128
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 456 516 473 415 439
Service Time 5.975 5.04 5.71 6.435 5.918
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.629 0.74 0.757 0.586 0.267
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 23.5 27.3 31.1 22.9 13.8
HCM Lane LOS CDDCB
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.2 6.2 6.5 3.6 1
364
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing AM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 23 2 143 179 567 0 0 302 154
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 23 2 143 179 567 0 0 302 154
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 25 2 157 197 623 0 0 332 169
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1348 1518 623 501 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1016 1016 -------
Stage 2 332 501 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 165 118 484 1058 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 348 314 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 725 541 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 135 0 484 1058 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 135 0 -------
Stage 1 283 0 -------
Stage 2 725 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 25.49 2.2 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1058 - 356 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.186 - 0.518 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.2 - 25.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 2.8 - -
365
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 130 70 103 301 22 45 325 127 18 288 13 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 130 70 103 301 22 45 325 127 18 288 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 141 76 112 327 24 49 353 138 20 313 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 12 437 194 143 697 311 59 484 189 26 644 29
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1554 1753 3497 1560 1753 1258 492 1767 1762 79 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 141 76 112 327 24 49 0 491 20 0 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1554 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1749 1767 0 1841 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 1.9 2.3 3.2 4.2 0.6 1.4 0.0 12.2 0.6 0.0 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 1.9 2.3 3.2 4.2 0.6 1.4 0.0 12.2 0.6 0.0 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 12 437 194 143 697 311 59 0 673 26 0 673 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.32 0.39 0.78 0.47 0.08 0.83 0.00 0.73 0.78 0.00 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 104 1931 858 311 2345 1046 207 0 1035 105 0 980 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.1 20.2 20.4 22.8 17.9 16.5 24.4 0.0 13.3 24.9 0.0 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.9 0.9 2.7 3.5 1.0 0.2 10.7 0.0 3.3 17.0 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.0 4.4 0.3 0.0 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 21.1 23.2 26.4 19.0 16.7 35.0 0.0 16.6 41.9 0.0 13.6 LnGrp LOS DCCCBBD BD B
Approach Vol, veh/h 226 463 540 347
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 20.6 18.3 15.2
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 11.3 6.7 23.5 5.4 15.1 5.7 24.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 28.0 6.0 27.0 3.0 34.0 3.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 4.3 3.4 8.9 2.3 6.2 2.6 14.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.4 0.0 3.8 0.0 4.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.0
HCM 7th LOS B
366
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 265 47 2 246 108 10
Future Vol, veh/h 265 47 2 246 108 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 276 49 2 256 113 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 326 0 562 302
Stage 1 - - - - 302 -
Stage 2 - - - - 260 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1228 - 486 736
Stage 1 - - - - 748 -
Stage 2 - - - - 781 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1227 - 485 735
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 485 -
Stage 1 - - - - 747 -
Stage 2 - - - - 779 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 14.54

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 500 1227 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.246 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.5 7.9 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - -
367
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing AM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.8
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 252 30 93 173 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 252 30 93 173 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 255 30 94 175 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 94 94 0 -
Stage 1 94 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.24 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 3.336 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 901 957 - 0
Stage 1 925 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 901 957 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 901 - - -
Stage 1 925 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.38 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 901 957 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.283 0.032 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.6 8.9 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.1 -
368
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Existing PM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.7
Intersection LOS B
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 118 36 19 0 217 0 118 41 230 152 0 Future Vol, veh/h 163 118 36 19 0 217 0 118 41 230 152 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 123 38 20 0 226 0 123 43 240 158 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 17.2 12.8 12.4 14.7

HCM LOS C B B B
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 8% 51% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 74% 0% 37% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 26% 92% 11% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 159 236 317 230 152
LT Vol 0 19 163 230 0
Through Vol 118 0 118 0 152
RT Vol 41 217 36 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 166 246 330 240 158
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.301 0.4 0.571 0.478 0.294
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.532 5.86 6.226 7.185 6.675
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 550 612 581 503 540
Service Time 4.585 3.907 4.244 4.906 4.396
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.302 0.402 0.568 0.477 0.293
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.4 12.8 17.2 16.3 12.2
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 1.9 3.6 2.5 1.2
369
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing PM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 44 1 90 143 355 0 0 342 217
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 44 1 90 143 355 0 0 342 217
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 49 1 100 159 394 0 0 380 241
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1092 1333 394 621 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 712 712 -------
Stage 2 380 621 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 236 153 652 955 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 484 434 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 689 478 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 197 0 652 955 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 197 0 -------
Stage 1 404 0 -------
Stage 2 689 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 21.14 2.73 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 955 - 371 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.166 - 0.404 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 - 21.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1.9 - -
370
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 292 41 100 183 25 24 219 107 23 216 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 292 41 100 183 25 24 219 107 23 216 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 307 43 105 193 26 25 231 113 24 227 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 21 670 299 134 896 400 31 347 170 30 527 21
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1560 1753 3497 1560 1753 1166 570 1767 1772 70 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 307 43 105 193 26 25 0 344 24 0 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1560 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1736 1767 0 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 3.7 1.1 2.8 2.1 0.6 0.7 0.0 8.3 0.6 0.0 5.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 3.7 1.1 2.8 2.1 0.6 0.7 0.0 8.3 0.6 0.0 5.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 21 670 299 134 896 400 31 0 517 30 0 548 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.46 0.14 0.78 0.22 0.07 0.80 0.00 0.67 0.79 0.00 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 110 2041 911 402 2625 1171 146 0 977 147 0 1037 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 17.2 16.1 21.8 14.0 13.5 23.5 0.0 14.8 23.5 0.0 13.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.5 1.0 0.5 3.7 0.3 0.1 16.2 0.0 3.1 15.7 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.3 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 3.1 0.4 0.0 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 42.2 18.2 16.6 25.5 14.3 13.6 39.7 0.0 17.9 39.2 0.0 14.7 LnGrp LOS D B B C B B D B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 366 324 369 260
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 17.9 19.4 17.0
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 14.2 5.8 19.3 5.6 17.3 5.8 19.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 28.0 4.0 27.0 3.0 36.0 4.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 5.7 2.7 7.0 2.4 4.1 2.6 10.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 2.3 0.0 3.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.5
HCM 7th LOS B
371
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 371 68 4 187 46 11
Future Vol, veh/h 371 68 4 187 46 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 403 74 4 203 50 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 478 0 655 441
Stage 1 - - - - 441 -
Stage 2 - - - - 214 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1079 - 429 614
Stage 1 - - - - 646 -
Stage 2 - - - - 819 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1078 - 426 613
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 426 -
Stage 1 - - - - 646 -
Stage 2 - - - - 814 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.17 14.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 453 1078 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.004 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.2 8.4 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - -
372
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing PM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.3
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 21 139 242 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 190 21 139 242 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 198 22 145 252 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 145 145 0 -
Stage 1 145 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 845 900 - 0
Stage 1 880 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 845 900 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 845 - - -
Stage 1 880 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.41 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 845 900 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.234 0.024 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.6 9.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.1 -
373
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Peak
Baseline 05/20/2025
Baseline SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 160 365 208 154 84
Average Queue (ft) 98 114 94 65 40
95th Queue (ft) 151 258 171 110 69
Link Distance (ft) 1286 894 675 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 117 113 22
Average Queue (ft) 51 41 4 4
95th Queue (ft) 93 81 37 17
Link Distance (ft) 1268 275 1106
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 94 70 61 120 120 74 52 115 261 99 188 Average Queue (ft) 6 42 15 30 58 62 40 11 26 150 18 108 95th Queue (ft) 28 78 50 54 99 105 70 38 66 248 62 173
Link Distance (ft) 2511 2511 1359 1359 1106 1071
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 0 9 0 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
374
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Peak
Baseline 05/20/2025
Baseline SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement NE
Directions Served LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 122
Average Queue (ft) 48
95th Queue (ft) 86
Link Distance (ft) 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 134
Average Queue (ft) 44
95th Queue (ft) 82
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 12
375
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak
Baseline 05/20/2025
Baseline SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 210 75 73 123 69
Average Queue (ft) 73 45 45 55 38
95th Queue (ft) 148 69 66 91 63
Link Distance (ft) 1286 894 675 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 97 79 22
Average Queue (ft) 44 37 3
95th Queue (ft) 73 69 15
Link Distance (ft) 1268 1104
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 50 138 114 74 136 74 76 31 189 192 46 209 Average Queue (ft) 18 64 36 22 66 42 23 8 26 113 13 80
95th Queue (ft) 45 100 86 52 116 76 62 28 82 183 36 150 Link Distance (ft) 2516 2516 1358 1358 1104 1073
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 1 1 3 0 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
376
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak
Baseline 05/20/2025
Baseline SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NW NE
Directions Served TR L T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 31 74
Average Queue (ft) 2 3 1 38
95th Queue (ft) 14 18 10 68
Link Distance (ft) 894 154 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 74
Average Queue (ft) 37
95th Queue (ft) 63
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9
377
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | F
(559) 570-8991
Appendix F: Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
378
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Existing plus Project AM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 90.1
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 149 15 14 0 448 0 226 36 310 104 0 Future Vol, veh/h 209 149 15 14 0 448 0 226 36 310 104 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 235 167 17 16 0 503 0 254 40 348 117 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 95.2 144 42.2 55.5

HCM LOS F F E F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 56% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 40% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 14% 97% 4% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 262 462 373 310 104
LT Vol 0 14 209 310 0
Through Vol 226 0 149 0 104
RT Vol 36 448 15 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 294 519 419 348 117
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.778 1.214 1.058 0.942 0.3
Departure Headway (Hd) 10.526 8.707 9.764 10.561 10.037 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 347 420 373 345 360
Service Time 8.526 6.707 7.764 8.261 7.737
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.847 1.236 1.123 1.009 0.325
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 42.2 144 95.2 68.4 17
HCM Lane LOS E F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 6.3 20.3 13.5 9.8 1.2
379
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project AM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 18.8
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 58 2 143 222 639 0 0 361 154
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 58 2 143 222 639 0 0 361 154
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 64 2 157 244 702 0 0 397 169
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1587 1756 702 566 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1190 1190 -------
Stage 2 397 566 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 118 84 436 1001 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 287 260 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 677 506 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 89 0 436 1001 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 89 0 -------
Stage 1 217 0 -------
Stage 2 677 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 135.56 2.51 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1001 - 206 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.244 - 1.084 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 - 135.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 10.3 - -
380
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project AM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 130 87 119 301 22 68 342 159 18 313 13 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 130 87 119 301 22 68 342 159 18 313 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 141 95 129 327 24 74 372 173 20 340 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 12 457 203 164 761 339 93 479 223 25 646 27
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1554 1753 3497 1560 1753 1187 552 1767 1769 73 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 141 95 129 327 24 74 0 545 20 0 354 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1554 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1738 1767 0 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 2.0 3.2 4.0 4.5 0.7 2.3 0.0 15.2 0.6 0.0 8.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 2.0 3.2 4.0 4.5 0.7 2.3 0.0 15.2 0.6 0.0 8.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 12 457 203 164 761 339 93 0 702 25 0 673 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.31 0.47 0.78 0.43 0.07 0.80 0.00 0.78 0.79 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 94 1687 749 282 2061 919 188 0 963 95 0 921 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 22.0 22.5 24.8 18.9 17.4 26.2 0.0 14.5 27.5 0.0 14.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 26.5 0.8 3.6 3.1 0.8 0.2 5.7 0.0 4.5 18.0 0.0 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.6 0.2 1.0 0.0 5.8 0.4 0.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 54.3 22.9 26.1 27.9 19.7 17.6 31.9 0.0 19.0 45.5 0.0 15.3 LnGrp LOS DCCCBBC BD B
Approach Vol, veh/h 245 480 619 374
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.3 21.8 20.6 16.9
Approach LOS C C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 12.3 8.0 25.4 5.4 17.2 5.8 27.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 27.0 6.0 28.0 3.0 33.0 3.0 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 5.2 4.3 10.5 2.3 6.5 2.6 17.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 3.7 0.0 5.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 20.8
HCM 7th LOS C
381
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 287 47 4 251 121 25
Future Vol, veh/h 287 47 4 251 121 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 299 49 4 261 126 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 349 0 594 324
Stage 1 - - - - 324 -
Stage 2 - - - - 270 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1204 - 466 714
Stage 1 - - - - 730 -
Stage 2 - - - - 773 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1203 - 464 714
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 464 -
Stage 1 - - - - 730 -
Stage 2 - - - - 771 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.13 15.51

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 493 1203 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.308 0.003 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.5 8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 - - -
382
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project AM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.7
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 259 30 107 196 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 259 30 107 196 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 262 30 108 198 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 108 108 0 -
Stage 1 108 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.24 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 3.336 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 884 940 - 0
Stage 1 911 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 884 940 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 884 - - -
Stage 1 911 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.58 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 884 940 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.296 0.032 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.8 9 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.1 -
383
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Existing plus Project PM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 22
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 161 36 29 0 309 0 118 47 288 152 0 Future Vol, veh/h 163 161 36 29 0 309 0 118 47 288 152 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 168 38 30 0 322 0 123 49 300 158 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 27 20.8 15.1 21.4

HCM LOS D C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 9% 45% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 72% 0% 45% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 28% 91% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 165 338 360 288 152
LT Vol 0 29 163 288 0
Through Vol 118 0 161 0 152
RT Vol 47 309 36 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 172 352 375 300 158
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.366 0.644 0.732 0.667 0.33
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.673 6.587 7.025 8.009 7.495
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 468 549 518 453 480
Service Time 5.735 4.621 5.056 5.747 5.233
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.368 0.641 0.724 0.662 0.329
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 15.1 20.8 27 25.4 13.9
HCM Lane LOS CCDDB
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 4.6 6.1 4.8 1.4
384
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project PM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.8
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 58 1 90 187 403 0 0 386 217
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 58 1 90 187 403 0 0 386 217
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 64 1 100 208 448 0 0 429 241
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1292 1533 448 670 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 863 863 -------
Stage 2 429 670 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 179 116 609 916 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 411 370 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 655 454 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 138 0 609 916 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 138 0 -------
Stage 1 318 0 -------
Stage 2 655 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 39.98 3.2 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 916 - 261 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.227 - 0.634 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.1 - 40 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - E - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 3.9 - -
385
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project PM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 292 56 110 183 25 32 241 122 23 233 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 292 56 110 183 25 32 241 122 23 233 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 307 59 116 193 26 34 254 128 24 245 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 21 660 294 148 915 408 39 365 184 30 553 20
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.02 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1560 1753 3497 1560 1753 1153 581 1767 1778 65 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 307 59 116 193 26 34 0 382 24 0 254 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1560 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1734 1767 0 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 4.0 1.6 3.3 2.2 0.6 1.0 0.0 9.8 0.7 0.0 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 4.0 1.6 3.3 2.2 0.6 1.0 0.0 9.8 0.7 0.0 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 21 660 294 148 915 408 39 0 549 30 0 574 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.47 0.20 0.78 0.21 0.06 0.86 0.00 0.70 0.80 0.00 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 103 1993 889 344 2474 1103 138 0 954 104 0 978 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.1 18.4 17.4 22.8 14.7 14.1 24.8 0.0 15.2 24.9 0.0 14.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.0 1.1 0.7 3.4 0.2 0.1 17.8 0.0 3.4 16.4 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.4 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.0 3.7 0.4 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 44.1 19.5 18.1 26.2 14.9 14.3 42.6 0.0 18.6 41.3 0.0 15.2 LnGrp LOS D B B C B B D B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 382 335 416 278
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.3 18.8 20.6 17.4
Approach LOS C B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 14.6 6.1 20.8 5.6 18.3 5.9 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 29.0 4.0 27.0 3.0 36.0 3.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 6.0 3.0 7.6 2.5 4.2 2.7 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.3 0.0 3.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.4
HCM 7th LOS B
386
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 388 68 8 202 57 23
Future Vol, veh/h 388 68 8 202 57 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 422 74 9 220 62 25
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 497 0 699 460
Stage 1 - - - - 460 -
Stage 2 - - - - 239 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1062 - 405 599
Stage 1 - - - - 634 -
Stage 2 - - - - 798 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1061 - 400 599
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 400 -
Stage 1 - - - - 633 -
Stage 2 - - - - 790 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.32 15.12

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 442 1061 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.197 0.008 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.1 8.4 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - -
387
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Existing plus Project PM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 21 160 250 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 209 21 160 250 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 218 22 167 260 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 167 167 0 -
Stage 1 167 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 821 875 - 0
Stage 1 860 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 821 875 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 821 - - -
Stage 1 860 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.8 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 821 875 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 0.025 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11 9.2 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0.1 -
388
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project AM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/20/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 149 15 14 0 448 0 226 36 310 104 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 149 15 14 0 448 0 226 36 310 104 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 235 167 17 0 0 520 0 254 40 348 117 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 0
Cap, veh/h 293 275 28 0 353 598 0 296 47 395 851 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1643 167 0 1841 3120 0 1552 244 1753 1841 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 184 0 0 520 0 0 294 348 117 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1811 0 1841 1560 0 0 1797 1753 1841 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.2 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 16.6 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.2 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 16.6 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.14 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 293 0 303 0 353 598 0 0 343 395 851 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.88 0.14 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 567 0 585 0 393 666 0 0 456 648 1232 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.7 0.0 33.4 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 33.9 32.4 13.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.1 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 11.7 8.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 7.6 1.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 39.8 0.0 35.4 0.0 0.0 45.1 0.0 0.0 45.6 40.6 13.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 419 520 294 465
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.8 45.1 45.6 33.7
Approach LOS DDDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.5 23.5 21.1 20.5 44.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.0 22.0 28.0 58.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.0 18.6 15.7 13.2 5.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.3 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 40.3
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 389
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project AM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/20/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 58 2 143 222 639 0 0 361 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 58 2 143 222 639 0 0 361 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 64 2 157 244 702 0 0 397 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 82 3 201 306 1173 0 0 477 203
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 467 15 1145 1767 1856 0 0 1235 526
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 223 0 0 244 702 0 0 0 566
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1626 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1761
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.3 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.3 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 Prop In Lane 0.29 0.70 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 285 0 0 306 1173 0 0 0 681
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 413 0 0 609 1866 0 0 0 1055
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.7 0.0 0.0 21.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 27.7 0.0 0.0 26.6 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 LnGrp LOS C C A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 223 946 566
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.7 11.7 18.7
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 39.4 13.5 25.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 * 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 55.4 19.0 * 33
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 14.3 9.3 18.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 5.6 0.5 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 16.0
HCM 7th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 390
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project PM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/20/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 163 161 36 29 0 309 0 118 47 288 152 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 163 161 36 29 0 309 0 118 47 288 152 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 168 38 0 0 354 0 123 49 300 158 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 295 244 55 0 292 493 0 179 71 368 773 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.42 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1464 331 0 1856 3135 0 1261 502 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 206 0 0 354 0 0 172 300 158 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1795 0 1856 1567 0 0 1763 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 9.7 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 9.7 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.28 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 295 0 299 0 292 493 0 0 250 368 773 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.82 0.20 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 828 0 841 0 574 970 0 0 649 946 1801 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.0 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 24.4 22.6 11.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 4.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 4.1 1.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.7 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 0.0 27.8 27.0 11.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 376 354 172 458
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.6 25.9 27.8 21.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.3 16.4 13.1 16.0 29.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.0 22.0 28.0 58.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 11.7 7.5 8.5 5.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 24.6
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 391
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing plus Project PM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/20/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 58 1 90 187 403 0 0 386 217 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 58 1 90 187 403 0 0 386 217 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 64 1 100 208 448 0 0 429 241
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 90 1 140 263 1248 0 0 506 284
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 638 10 997 1767 1856 0 0 1116 627
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 165 0 0 208 448 0 0 0 670
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1644 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1743
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 0.0 0.0 6.5 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 0.0 0.0 6.5 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 Prop In Lane 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 232 0 0 263 1248 0 0 0 790
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 318 0 0 498 1908 0 0 0 1178
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.3 0.0 0.0 23.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 27.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.7 LnGrp LOS C C A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 165 656 670
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.9 11.9 17.7
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 42.8 12.5 30.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 58.4 16.0 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 7.9 8.5 21.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.0 0.3 4.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 16.3
HCM 7th LOS B
392
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 244 158 165 151 359 268 198
Average Queue (ft) 122 87 46 79 157 174 50
95th Queue (ft) 207 151 97 131 270 283 124
Link Distance (ft) 1284 886 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 11
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 208 271 251 299
Average Queue (ft) 80 107 117 173
95th Queue (ft) 161 182 205 284
Link Distance (ft) 1268 263 263 1106
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 31 72 53 62 152 133 119 71 189 374 98 198 Average Queue (ft) 5 45 19 28 77 69 39 11 50 180 15 103 95th Queue (ft) 23 73 48 55 130 122 83 38 132 333 47 173 Link Distance (ft) 2511 2511 1359 1359 1106 1071
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 16 24
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 11 4
393
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 22 31 74
Average Queue (ft) 1 1 47
95th Queue (ft) 7 10 69
Link Distance (ft) 886 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 90
Average Queue (ft) 44
95th Queue (ft) 73
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 34
394
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 135 183 147 124 156 240 138
Average Queue (ft) 80 92 46 51 84 157 60
95th Queue (ft) 126 171 96 89 144 236 116
Link Distance (ft) 1284 886 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 115 182 117 307
Average Queue (ft) 49 93 63 174
95th Queue (ft) 93 150 103 270
Link Distance (ft) 1267 263 263 1104
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 138 116 61 130 140 53 101 69 212 99 214 Average Queue (ft) 18 65 58 26 67 42 19 12 21 116 25 94 95th Queue (ft) 47 103 98 53 112 89 43 46 50 191 60 159 Link Distance (ft) 2516 2516 1358 1358 1104 1073
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 0 0 0 3 1 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 4
395
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 31 78
Average Queue (ft) 2 3 41
95th Queue (ft) 19 18 73
Link Distance (ft) 886 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 91
Average Queue (ft) 40
95th Queue (ft) 68
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 12
396
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:18:31 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\1 Existing plus Project\1 SR 99 SB OffRamp Merced Street.sip9 397
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 14 4.0 16 4.0 0.551 11.2 LOS B 4.4 113.3 0.62 0.65 0.87 35.7 18x R2 448 4.0 503 4.0 0.551 11.2 LOS B 4.4 113.3 0.62 0.65 0.87 35.3 Approach 462 4.0 519 4.0 0.551 11.2 LOS B 4.4 113.3 0.62 0.65 0.87 35.3 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 310 4.0 348 4.0 0.384 6.7 LOS A 1.8 46.9 0.09 0.03 0.09 28.8 6x T1 104 4.0 117 4.0 0.384 6.7 LOS A 1.8 46.9 0.09 0.03 0.09 28.9 Approach 414 4.0 465 4.0 0.384 6.7 LOS A 1.8 46.9 0.09 0.03 0.09 28.8 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 209 4.0 235 4.0 0.436 8.8 LOS A 2.1 55.0 0.51 0.48 0.55 30.6 4x T1 149 4.0 167 4.0 0.436 8.8 LOS A 2.1 55.0 0.51 0.48 0.55 30.9 14x R2 15 4.0 17 4.0 0.436 8.8 LOS A 2.1 55.0 0.51 0.48 0.55 30.2 Approach 373 4.0 419 4.0 0.436 8.8 LOS A 2.1 55.0 0.51 0.48 0.55 30.7 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 226 4.0 254 4.0 0.391 9.8 LOS A 2.2 57.0 0.69 0.71 0.75 28.8 12x R2 36 4.0 40 4.0 0.391 9.8 LOS A 2.2 57.0 0.69 0.71 0.75 28.2 Approach 262 4.0 294 4.0 0.391 9.8 LOS A 2.2 57.0 0.69 0.71 0.75 28.7 All Vehicles 1511 4.0 1698 4.0 0.551 9.1 LOS A 4.4 113.3 0.46 0.45 0.56 31.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 29 3.0 30 3.0 0.325 6.6 LOS A 1.3 33.0 0.36 0.28 0.36 38.7 18x R2 309 3.0 322 3.0 0.325 6.6 LOS A 1.3 33.0 0.36 0.28 0.36 38.1 Approach 338 3.0 352 3.0 0.325 6.6 LOS A 1.3 33.0 0.36 0.28 0.36 38.2 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 288 3.0 300 3.0 0.378 6.6 LOS A 1.6 40.1 0.12 0.04 0.12 29.0 6x T1 152 3.0 158 3.0 0.378 6.6 LOS A 1.6 40.1 0.12 0.04 0.12 29.1 Approach 440 3.0 458 3.0 0.378 6.6 LOS A 1.6 40.1 0.12 0.04 0.12 29.0 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 163 3.0 170 3.0 0.387 8.0 LOS A 1.7 43.1 0.49 0.44 0.49 31.2 4x T1 161 3.0 168 3.0 0.387 8.0 LOS A 1.7 43.1 0.49 0.44 0.49 31.4 14x R2 36 3.0 38 3.0 0.387 8.0 LOS A 1.7 43.1 0.49 0.44 0.49 30.7 Approach 360 3.0 375 3.0 0.387 8.0 LOS A 1.7 43.1 0.49 0.44 0.49 31.2 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 118 3.0 123 3.0 0.202 6.3 LOS A 0.9 22.7 0.54 0.48 0.54 30.1 12x R2 47 3.0 49 3.0 0.202 6.3 LOS A 0.9 22.7 0.54 0.48 0.54 29.5 Approach 165 3.0 172 3.0 0.202 6.3 LOS A 0.9 22.7 0.54 0.48 0.54 29.9 All Vehicles 1303 3.0 1357 3.0 0.387 7.0 LOS A 1.7 43.1 0.34 0.27 0.34 31.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8:55:00 AM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\1 Existing plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
400
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 58 3.0 64 3.0 0.316 9.0 LOS A 1.6 42.0 0.71 0.70 0.71 36.6 8x T1 2 3.0 2 3.0 0.316 9.0 LOS A 1.6 42.0 0.71 0.70 0.71 36.8 18x R2 143 3.0 157 3.0 0.316 9.0 LOS A 1.6 42.0 0.71 0.70 0.71 36.1 Approach 203 3.0 223 3.0 0.316 9.0 LOS A 1.6 42.0 0.71 0.70 0.71 36.3 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 361 3.0 397 3.0 0.530 9.7 LOS A 3.1 78.7 0.45 0.40 0.51 28.8 16x R2 154 3.0 169 3.0 0.530 9.7 LOS A 3.1 78.7 0.45 0.40 0.51 28.2 Approach 515 3.0 566 3.0 0.530 9.7 LOS A 3.1 78.7 0.45 0.40 0.51 28.6 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 222 3.0 244 3.0 0.765 15.5 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 2x T1 639 3.0 702 3.0 0.765 15.5 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.5 Approach 861 3.0 946 3.0 0.765 15.5 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.5 All Vehicles 1579 3.0 1735 3.0 0.765 12.8 LOS B 3.1 78.7 0.24 0.22 0.26 31.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Existing + Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 58 3.0 64 3.0 0.184 5.8 LOS A 0.7 18.9 0.50 0.44 0.50 38.4 8x T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.184 5.8 LOS A 0.7 18.9 0.50 0.44 0.50 38.6 18x R2 90 3.0 100 3.0 0.184 5.8 LOS A 0.7 18.9 0.50 0.44 0.50 37.9 Approach 149 3.0 166 3.0 0.184 5.8 LOS A 0.7 18.9 0.50 0.44 0.50 38.1 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 386 3.0 429 3.0 0.616 11.5 LOS B 5.3 136.1 0.47 0.48 0.66 28.1 16x R2 217 3.0 241 3.0 0.616 11.5 LOS B 5.3 136.1 0.47 0.48 0.66 27.6 Approach 603 3.0 670 3.0 0.616 11.5 LOS B 5.3 136.1 0.47 0.48 0.66 27.9 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 187 3.0 208 3.0 0.530 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.2 2x T1 403 3.0 448 3.0 0.530 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.4 Approach 590 3.0 656 3.0 0.530 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 All Vehicles 1342 3.0 1491 3.0 0.616 9.7 LOS A 5.3 136.1 0.27 0.26 0.35 30.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8:57:04 AM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\1 Existing plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
402
Section , Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LTR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 247 227 98 54
Average Queue (ft) 67 70 47 3
95th Queue (ft) 149 141 86 21
Link Distance (ft) 1234 844 619 148
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LT TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 96 32 266
Average Queue (ft) 46 2 99
95th Queue (ft) 75 15 194
Link Distance (ft) 1216 148 1045
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
403
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Existing plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LTR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 183 101 72 82
Average Queue (ft) 64 46 32 10
95th Queue (ft) 130 87 60 44
Link Distance (ft) 1234 844 619 148
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LT TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 76 76 230
Average Queue (ft) 33 9 85
95th Queue (ft) 61 42 167
Link Distance (ft) 1216 148 1044
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
404
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | G
(559) 570-8991
Appendix G: Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
405
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Near Term plus Project AM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 143.5
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 170 16 14 0 544 0 240 39 321 109 0 Future Vol, veh/h 209 170 16 14 0 544 0 240 39 321 109 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 235 191 18 16 0 611 0 270 44 361 122 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 125.8 259.8 53.7 67

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 53% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 43% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 14% 97% 4% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 279 558 395 321 109
LT Vol 0 14 209 321 0
Through Vol 240 0 170 0 109
RT Vol 39 544 16 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 313 627 444 361 122
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.838 1.495 1.14 0.991 0.32
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.616 9.16 10.723 11.412 10.885 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 313 401 342 321 333
Service Time 9.616 7.16 8.723 9.112 8.585
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1 1.564 1.298 1.125 0.366
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 53.7 259.8 125.8 83.5 18.6
HCM Lane LOS FFFFC
HCM 95th-tile Q 7.2 31.3 15.3 10.7 1.3
406
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project AM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 37.7
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 59 2 143 284 687 0 0 376 154
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 59 2 143 284 687 0 0 376 154
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 65 2 157 312 755 0 0 413 169
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1792 1962 755 582 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1379 1379 -------
Stage 2 413 582 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 88 63 407 987 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 232 211 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 666 497 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 60 0 407 987 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 60 0 -------
Stage 1 159 0 -------
Stage 2 666 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v $ 300.58 3.02 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 987 - 152 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.316 - 1.476 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.3 -$ 300.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 14.7 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 407
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project AM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 130 88 123 301 22 74 376 169 18 323 13 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 130 88 123 301 22 74 376 169 18 323 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 141 96 134 327 24 80 409 184 20 351 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 12 450 200 170 764 341 101 505 227 25 667 27 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1554 1753 3497 1560 1753 1201 540 1767 1772 71 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 141 96 134 327 24 80 0 593 20 0 365 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1554 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1741 1767 0 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 2.2 3.4 4.4 4.7 0.7 2.6 0.0 17.6 0.7 0.0 9.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 2.2 3.4 4.4 4.7 0.7 2.6 0.0 17.6 0.7 0.0 9.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 12 450 200 170 764 341 101 0 731 25 0 694 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.31 0.48 0.79 0.43 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.81 0.80 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 89 1665 740 238 1962 875 209 0 918 90 0 846 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.1 23.3 23.8 26.0 19.8 18.2 27.4 0.0 15.0 28.9 0.0 14.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 26.9 0.8 3.8 7.1 0.8 0.2 5.0 0.0 6.1 18.6 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.8 1.3 1.9 1.7 0.3 1.2 0.0 7.0 0.4 0.0 3.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 56.0 24.1 27.6 33.1 20.6 18.4 32.4 0.0 21.1 47.5 0.0 15.6 LnGrp LOS ECCCCBC CD B
Approach Vol, veh/h 246 485 673 385
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 24.0 22.4 17.2
Approach LOS C C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.7 12.6 8.4 27.1 5.4 17.9 5.8 29.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 28.0 7.0 27.0 3.0 33.0 3.0 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 5.4 4.6 11.1 2.3 6.7 2.7 19.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.7 0.0 5.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.3
HCM 7th LOS C
408
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 322 47 4 347 121 25
Future Vol, veh/h 322 47 4 347 121 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 335 49 4 361 126 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 385 0 731 361
Stage 1 - - - - 361 -
Stage 2 - - - - 370 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1168 - 388 681
Stage 1 - - - - 703 -
Stage 2 - - - - 697 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1167 - 386 681
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 386 -
Stage 1 - - - - 702 -
Stage 2 - - - - 694 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.09 18.52

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 417 1167 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.365 0.004 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 18.5 8.1 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 0 - - -
409
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project AM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.1
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 355 38 110 228 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 355 38 110 228 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 359 38 111 230 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 111 111 0 -
Stage 1 111 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.24 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 3.336 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 881 937 - 0
Stage 1 909 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 881 937 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 881 - - -
Stage 1 909 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.59 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 881 937 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.407 0.041 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 9 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 0.1 -
410
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Near Term plus Project PM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 47.2
Intersection LOS E
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 241 40 29 0 372 0 124 49 321 166 0 Future Vol, veh/h 163 241 40 29 0 372 0 124 49 321 166 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 251 42 30 0 388 0 129 51 334 173 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 75.4 43 19.7 34.8

HCM LOS F E C D
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 7% 37% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 72% 0% 54% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 28% 93% 9% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 173 401 444 321 166
LT Vol 0 29 163 321 0
Through Vol 124 0 241 0 166
RT Vol 49 372 40 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 180 418 463 334 173
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.454 0.868 1.018 0.834 0.407
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.254 7.617 7.925 9.115 8.596
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 391 480 463 401 422
Service Time 7.254 5.617 5.925 6.815 6.296
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.46 0.871 1 0.833 0.41
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.7 43 75.4 43.9 17.1
HCM Lane LOS C E F E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 9.1 13.7 7.7 1.9
411
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project PM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.5
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 61 1 90 235 424 0 0 430 217
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 61 1 90 235 424 0 0 430 217
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 68 1 100 261 471 0 0 478 241
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1471 1712 471 719 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 993 993 -------
Stage 2 478 719 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 139 90 591 878 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 357 322 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 622 431 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 98 0 591 878 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 98 0 -------
Stage 1 251 0 -------
Stage 2 622 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 83.82 3.86 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 878 - 195 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.297 - 0.868 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.8 - 83.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - 6.5 - -
412
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project PM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 292 67 117 183 25 38 257 125 23 258 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 292 67 117 183 25 38 257 125 23 258 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 307 71 123 193 26 40 271 132 24 272 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 21 655 292 157 927 414 47 380 185 30 563 19
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1560 1753 3497 1560 1753 1168 569 1767 1786 59 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 307 71 123 193 26 40 0 403 24 0 281 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1560 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1736 1767 0 1845 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 4.1 1.5 3.6 2.3 0.7 1.2 0.0 10.7 0.7 0.0 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 4.1 1.5 3.6 2.3 0.7 1.2 0.0 10.7 0.7 0.0 6.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 21 655 292 157 927 414 47 0 565 30 0 582 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.47 0.24 0.78 0.21 0.06 0.85 0.00 0.71 0.80 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 100 1931 861 334 2397 1069 134 0 926 101 0 948 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.9 19.0 9.8 23.4 15.0 14.4 25.4 0.0 15.6 25.7 0.0 14.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.3 1.1 0.9 3.2 0.2 0.1 14.2 0.0 3.6 16.8 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.5 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.0 4.1 0.4 0.0 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 45.2 20.1 10.7 26.6 15.2 14.6 39.6 0.0 19.1 42.5 0.0 15.9 LnGrp LOS D C B C B B D B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 394 342 443 305
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.4 19.3 21.0 17.9
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 14.8 6.4 21.6 5.6 18.9 5.9 22.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 29.0 4.0 27.0 3.0 36.0 3.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 6.1 3.2 8.5 2.5 4.3 2.7 12.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 3.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.6
HCM 7th LOS B
413
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 503 68 8 265 57 23
Future Vol, veh/h 503 68 8 265 57 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 547 74 9 288 62 25
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 622 0 892 585
Stage 1 - - - - 585 -
Stage 2 - - - - 307 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 954 - 311 509
Stage 1 - - - - 555 -
Stage 2 - - - - 743 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 953 - 307 509
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 307 -
Stage 1 - - - - 555 -
Stage 2 - - - - 735 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.26 18.82

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 347 953 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.251 0.009 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 18.8 8.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - -
414
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Near Term plus Project PM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 272 30 162 363 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 272 30 162 363 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 283 31 169 378 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 169 169 0 -
Stage 1 169 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 819 873 - 0
Stage 1 859 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 819 873 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 819 - - -
Stage 1 859 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.46 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 819 873 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.346 0.036 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.7 9.3 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 0.1 -
415
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project AM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/20/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 170 16 14 0 544 0 240 39 321 109 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 170 16 14 0 544 0 240 39 321 109 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 235 191 18 0 0 628 0 270 44 361 122 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 0
Cap, veh/h 300 284 27 0 411 697 0 388 62 412 760 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.23 0.41 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1657 156 0 1841 3120 0 3109 485 1753 1841 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 209 0 0 628 0 155 159 361 122 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1813 0 1841 1560 0 1749 1753 1753 1841 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.3 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 6.8 7.0 16.0 3.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 6.8 7.0 16.0 3.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.28 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 310 0 411 697 0 225 226 412 760 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.69 0.70 0.88 0.16 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 609 0 629 0 422 716 0 477 478 696 1324 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 0.0 30.4 0.0 33.6 33.7 29.7 14.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 3.7 4.0 6.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.3 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 3.0 3.1 7.1 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 36.4 0.0 33.8 0.0 0.0 44.8 0.0 37.3 37.6 36.5 15.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 444 628 314 483
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.2 44.8 37.5 31.1
Approach LOS DDDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.9 22.9 15.0 19.8 37.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.0 22.0 28.0 58.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.8 18.0 9.0 12.3 5.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 1.4 1.5 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 37.7
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 416
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project AM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/20/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 59 2 143 284 687 0 0 376 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 59 2 143 284 687 0 0 376 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 2 157 312 755 0 0 413 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 81 2 195 370 1221 0 0 481 197
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.21 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 472 15 1140 1767 1856 0 0 1251 512
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 224 0 0 312 755 0 0 0 582
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1627 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1763
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 Prop In Lane 0.29 0.70 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 278 0 0 370 1221 0 0 0 677
V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 368 0 0 543 1662 0 0 0 924
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.7 0.0 0.0 23.5 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.4 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 0.0 0.0 4.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.1 0.0 0.0 31.4 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.7 LnGrp LOS C C A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 224 1067 582
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.1 13.8 23.7
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 45.3 16.9 28.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 55.4 19.0 32.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.2 16.5 12.5 20.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 6.2 0.5 3.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.3
HCM 7th LOS B
417
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project PM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/20/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 163 241 40 29 0 372 0 124 49 321 166 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 163 241 40 29 0 372 0 124 49 321 166 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 251 42 0 0 420 0 129 51 334 173 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 367 322 54 0 319 538 0 296 112 393 739 0
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.40 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1549 259 0 1856 3136 0 2592 944 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 293 0 0 420 0 89 91 334 173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1808 0 1856 1568 0 1763 1681 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 3.3 3.5 12.6 4.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 3.3 3.5 12.6 4.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.56 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 367 0 376 0 319 538 0 209 199 393 739 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.43 0.46 0.85 0.23 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 709 0 725 0 492 831 0 556 530 810 1542 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.2 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 28.6 28.7 26.0 13.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.4 1.6 5.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 1.4 1.4 5.5 1.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 25.1 0.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 30.2 0.0 29.9 30.3 31.2 14.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 463 420 180 507
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.0 30.2 30.1 25.3
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.9 19.5 12.9 20.5 32.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.0 22.0 28.0 58.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 14.6 5.5 12.7 6.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.7 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 28.0
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 418
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Near Term plus Project PM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/20/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 61 1 90 235 424 0 0 430 217 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 61 1 90 235 424 0 0 430 217 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 68 1 100 261 471 0 0 478 241
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 88 1 129 313 1306 0 0 542 273
Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 663 10 975 1767 1856 0 0 1163 587
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 169 0 0 261 471 0 0 0 719
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1647 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1750
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 0.0 9.3 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 0.0 0.0 9.3 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.2 Prop In Lane 0.40 0.59 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 218 0 0 313 1306 0 0 0 815
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 279 0 0 436 1669 0 0 0 1035
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.2 0.0 0.0 25.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.8 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 37.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 LnGrp LOS D D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 169 732 719
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 15.2 23.3
Approach LOS D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.6 50.3 15.5 34.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 58.4 16.0 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 8.5 11.3 26.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.2 0.3 4.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 21.1
HCM 7th LOS C
419
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 247 225 179 197 161 318 274 116
Average Queue (ft) 125 110 77 96 58 140 177 39
95th Queue (ft) 214 185 144 155 117 260 269 96
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 12 25
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 220 269 267 350
Average Queue (ft) 85 139 134 190
95th Queue (ft) 156 225 234 319
Link Distance (ft) 1268 263 263 1106
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 52 74 53 54 182 179 143 60 189 476 89 296 Average Queue (ft) 11 41 16 33 81 72 43 14 66 186 15 125 95th Queue (ft) 37 72 46 59 146 133 88 43 161 345 54 222 Link Distance (ft) 2511 2511 1359 1359 1106 1071
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 2 0 17 0 25
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 12 0 4
420
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement NE
Directions Served LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 121
Average Queue (ft) 60
95th Queue (ft) 104
Link Distance (ft) 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB NB
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 135 144
Average Queue (ft) 60 5
95th Queue (ft) 101 47
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 62
421
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 150 221 95 93 93 179 264 136
Average Queue (ft) 84 124 52 54 36 68 169 73
95th Queue (ft) 136 207 88 87 75 134 249 135
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 181 197 132 399
Average Queue (ft) 54 114 62 220
95th Queue (ft) 118 184 112 361
Link Distance (ft) 1267 263 263 1104
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 122 96 52 205 100 95 43 190 305 99 258 Average Queue (ft) 20 65 47 27 73 41 24 13 39 134 19 89 95th Queue (ft) 49 107 81 52 143 76 63 36 117 248 53 167 Link Distance (ft) 2516 2516 1358 1358 1104 1073
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 0 1 8 0 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 0 3 0 4
422
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 31 96
Average Queue (ft) 3 3 37
95th Queue (ft) 20 18 67
Link Distance (ft) 882 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 87
Average Queue (ft) 44
95th Queue (ft) 71
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 15
423
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:13:43 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\2 Near Term plus Project\1 SR 99 SB OffRamp Merced Street.sip9 424
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 14 4.0 16 4.0 0.676 15.0 LOS B 8.0 206.2 0.72 0.86 1.25 33.7 18x R2 544 4.0 611 4.0 0.676 15.0 LOS B 8.0 206.2 0.72 0.86 1.25 33.2 Approach 558 4.0 627 4.0 0.676 15.0 LOS B 8.0 206.2 0.72 0.86 1.25 33.3 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 321 4.0 361 4.0 0.399 6.9 LOS A 2.0 52.0 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.7 6x T1 109 4.0 122 4.0 0.399 6.9 LOS A 2.0 52.0 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.9 Approach 430 4.0 483 4.0 0.399 6.9 LOS A 2.0 52.0 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.8 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 209 4.0 235 4.0 0.468 9.4 LOS A 2.7 68.4 0.53 0.54 0.65 30.4 4x T1 170 4.0 191 4.0 0.468 9.4 LOS A 2.7 68.4 0.53 0.54 0.65 30.6 14x R2 16 4.0 18 4.0 0.468 9.4 LOS A 2.7 68.4 0.53 0.54 0.65 30.0 Approach 395 4.0 444 4.0 0.468 9.4 LOS A 2.7 68.4 0.53 0.54 0.65 30.5 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 240 4.0 270 4.0 0.433 10.9 LOS B 2.8 71.5 0.73 0.79 0.88 28.4 12x R2 39 4.0 44 4.0 0.433 10.9 LOS B 2.8 71.5 0.73 0.79 0.88 27.8 Approach 279 4.0 313 4.0 0.433 10.9 LOS B 2.8 71.5 0.73 0.79 0.88 28.3 All Vehicles 1662 4.0 1867 4.0 0.676 10.9 LOS B 8.0 206.2 0.52 0.56 0.74 30.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 29 3.0 30 3.0 0.389 7.4 LOS A 1.7 42.8 0.39 0.31 0.39 38.1 18x R2 372 3.0 388 3.0 0.389 7.4 LOS A 1.7 42.8 0.39 0.31 0.39 37.6 Approach 401 3.0 418 3.0 0.389 7.4 LOS A 1.7 42.8 0.39 0.31 0.39 37.6 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 321 3.0 334 3.0 0.418 7.2 LOS A 1.9 47.9 0.12 0.04 0.12 28.8 6x T1 166 3.0 173 3.0 0.418 7.2 LOS A 1.9 47.9 0.12 0.04 0.12 28.9 Approach 487 3.0 507 3.0 0.418 7.2 LOS A 1.9 47.9 0.12 0.04 0.12 28.8 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 163 3.0 170 3.0 0.494 10.0 LOS B 3.2 81.3 0.57 0.61 0.74 30.4 4x T1 241 3.0 251 3.0 0.494 10.0 LOS B 3.2 81.3 0.57 0.61 0.74 30.6 14x R2 40 3.0 42 3.0 0.494 10.0 LOS B 3.2 81.3 0.57 0.61 0.74 30.0 Approach 444 3.0 463 3.0 0.494 10.0 LOS B 3.2 81.3 0.57 0.61 0.74 30.5 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 124 3.0 129 3.0 0.239 7.5 LOS A 1.2 30.2 0.64 0.60 0.64 29.6 12x R2 49 3.0 51 3.0 0.239 7.5 LOS A 1.2 30.2 0.64 0.60 0.64 29.0 Approach 173 3.0 180 3.0 0.239 7.5 LOS A 1.2 30.2 0.64 0.60 0.64 29.5 All Vehicles 1505 3.0 1568 3.0 0.494 8.1 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.39 0.34 0.44 31.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8:25:19 AM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\2 Near Term plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
427
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 59 3.0 65 3.0 0.363 10.9 LOS B 2.1 54.7 0.79 0.80 0.84 35.5 8x T1 2 3.0 2 3.0 0.363 10.9 LOS B 2.1 54.7 0.79 0.80 0.84 35.6 18x R2 143 3.0 157 3.0 0.363 10.9 LOS B 2.1 54.7 0.79 0.80 0.84 35.0 Approach 204 3.0 224 3.0 0.363 10.9 LOS B 2.1 54.7 0.79 0.80 0.84 35.2 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 376 3.0 413 3.0 0.563 10.7 LOS B 4.3 109.6 0.51 0.55 0.71 28.4 16x R2 154 3.0 169 3.0 0.563 10.7 LOS B 4.3 109.6 0.51 0.55 0.71 27.9 Approach 530 3.0 582 3.0 0.563 10.7 LOS B 4.3 109.6 0.51 0.55 0.71 28.3 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 284 3.0 312 3.0 0.863 22.0 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 2x T1 687 3.0 755 3.0 0.863 22.0 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.4 Approach 971 3.0 1067 3.0 0.863 22.0 LOS C 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.4 All Vehicles 1705 3.0 1874 3.0 0.863 17.2 LOS C 4.3 109.6 0.25 0.27 0.32 31.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [NT+Project - SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 61 3.0 68 3.0 0.198 6.3 LOS A 0.8 21.7 0.55 0.50 0.55 38.1 8x T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.198 6.3 LOS A 0.8 21.7 0.55 0.50 0.55 38.2 18x R2 90 3.0 100 3.0 0.198 6.3 LOS A 0.8 21.7 0.55 0.50 0.55 37.6 Approach 152 3.0 169 3.0 0.198 6.3 LOS A 0.8 21.7 0.55 0.50 0.55 37.8 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 430 3.0 478 3.0 0.679 13.6 LOS B 8.2 208.8 0.56 0.69 0.96 27.4 16x R2 217 3.0 241 3.0 0.679 13.6 LOS B 8.2 208.8 0.56 0.69 0.96 26.9 Approach 647 3.0 719 3.0 0.679 13.6 LOS B 8.2 208.8 0.56 0.69 0.96 27.2 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 235 3.0 261 3.0 0.592 10.0 LOS B 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.2 2x T1 424 3.0 471 3.0 0.592 10.0 LOS B 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 Approach 659 3.0 732 3.0 0.592 10.0 LOS B 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 All Vehicles 1458 3.0 1620 3.0 0.679 11.2 LOS B 8.2 208.8 0.31 0.36 0.48 30.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8:46:22 AM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\2 Near Term plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
429
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 181 465 202 103
Average Queue (ft) 70 176 67 8
95th Queue (ft) 131 357 131 43
Link Distance (ft) 1233 844 619 148
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LT TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 194 208 274
Average Queue (ft) 63 56 120
95th Queue (ft) 129 191 223
Link Distance (ft) 1216 148 1045
Upstream Blk Time (%) 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 105
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 105
430
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/20/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 291 89 90 75
Average Queue (ft) 98 46 39 12
95th Queue (ft) 193 82 70 46
Link Distance (ft) 1233 844 619 148
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LT TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 98 75 678
Average Queue (ft) 35 2 221
95th Queue (ft) 67 25 474
Link Distance (ft) 1216 148 1044
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
431
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | H
(559) 570-8991
Appendix H: Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions 432
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 135.6
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 168 16 7 0 629 0 240 32 246 109 0 Future Vol, veh/h 209 168 16 7 0 629 0 240 32 246 109 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 227 183 17 8 0 684 0 261 35 267 118 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 82.1 268 39.4 31.3

HCM LOS F F E D
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 53% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 43% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 99% 4% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 272 636 393 246 109
LT Vol 0 7 209 246 0
Through Vol 240 0 168 0 109
RT Vol 32 629 16 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 296 691 427 267 118
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.747 1.523 1.01 0.718 0.301
Departure Headway (Hd) 10.684 8.089 9.869 11 10.474
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 340 456 372 332 346
Service Time 8.684 6.089 7.869 8.7 8.174
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.871 1.515 1.148 0.804 0.341
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 39.4 268 82.1 37.3 17.6
HCM Lane LOS E F F E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 5.8 36.1 12 5.2 1.2
433
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 20.1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 25 2 187 381 675 0 0 333 154
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 25 2 187 381 675 0 0 333 154
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 27 2 203 414 734 0 0 362 167
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1924 2091 734 529 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1562 1562 -------
Stage 2 362 529 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 73 52 419 1033 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 189 172 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 702 525 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 44 0 419 1033 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 44 0 -------
Stage 1 113 0 -------
Stage 2 702 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 145.65 3.9 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1033 - 208 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.401 - 1.117 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.8 - 145.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 - 11 - -
434
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 335 80 111 1412 30 69 403 142 20 308 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 335 80 111 1412 30 69 403 142 20 308 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 364 87 121 1535 33 75 438 154 22 335 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 16 1287 573 147 1548 691 95 467 164 27 551 36 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1558 1753 3497 1560 1753 1299 457 1767 1722 113 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 364 87 121 1535 33 75 0 592 22 0 357 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1558 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1756 1767 0 1835 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 8.5 4.3 7.8 50.2 1.1 4.9 0.0 37.5 1.4 0.0 18.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 8.5 4.3 7.8 50.2 1.1 4.9 0.0 37.5 1.4 0.0 18.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 16 1287 573 147 1548 691 95 0 631 27 0 587 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.28 0.15 0.82 0.99 0.05 0.79 0.00 0.94 0.83 0.00 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 46 1287 573 259 1548 691 152 0 655 46 0 587 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.0 25.7 24.4 51.9 31.9 12.2 53.8 0.0 35.7 56.6 0.0 33.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 33.2 0.3 0.3 4.3 20.8 0.1 5.3 0.0 21.8 20.6 0.0 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 3.4 1.6 3.5 23.4 0.5 2.3 0.0 19.4 0.8 0.0 8.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 90.1 25.9 24.6 56.2 52.7 12.3 59.1 0.0 57.5 77.2 0.0 35.8 LnGrp LOS F C C E D B E E E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 465 1689 667 379
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.6 52.2 57.7 38.2
Approach LOS C D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.7 47.4 11.3 41.9 6.1 56.0 6.7 46.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 37.0 10.0 36.0 3.0 51.0 3.0 43.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 10.5 6.9 20.9 2.9 52.2 3.4 39.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.8 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 48.1
HCM 7th LOS D
435
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 368 47 2 542 108 20
Future Vol, veh/h 368 47 2 542 108 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 383 49 2 565 113 21
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 433 0 978 409
Stage 1 - - - - 409 -
Stage 2 - - - - 569 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1121 - 277 640
Stage 1 - - - - 669 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1120 - 276 640
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 276 -
Stage 1 - - - - 668 -
Stage 2 - - - - 564 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 25.91

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 303 1120 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.44 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 25.9 8.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 0 - - -
436
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.1
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 548 44 133 273 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 548 44 133 273 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 554 44 134 276 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 134 134 0 -
Stage 1 134 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.24 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 3.336 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 855 909 - 0
Stage 1 887 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 855 909 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 855 - - -
Stage 1 887 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.06 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 855 909 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.648 0.049 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 16.6 9.2 -
HCM Lane LOS C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.9 0.2 -
437
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 95.6
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 392 40 19 0 420 0 124 43 313 166 0 Future Vol, veh/h 163 392 40 19 0 420 0 124 43 313 166 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 408 42 20 0 438 0 129 45 326 173 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 195.9 55.1 20.9 34.1

HCM LOS F F C D
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 4% 27% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 74% 0% 66% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 26% 96% 7% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 167 439 595 313 166
LT Vol 0 19 163 313 0
Through Vol 124 0 392 0 166
RT Vol 43 420 40 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 174 457 620 326 173
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.437 0.927 1.353 0.806 0.404
Departure Headway (Hd) 10.216 8.103 7.857 9.755 9.234
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 355 453 465 375 393
Service Time 8.216 6.103 5.942 7.455 6.934
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.49 1.009 1.333 0.869 0.44
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 20.9 55.1 195.9 42.6 18.1
HCM Lane LOS C F F E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.1 10.6 28.2 7 1.9
438
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 47 1 124 305 402 0 0 436 217
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 47 1 124 305 402 0 0 436 217
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 51 1 135 332 437 0 0 474 236
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1574 1810 437 710 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1100 1100 -------
Stage 2 474 710 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 120 78 617 885 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 317 287 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 624 435 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 75 0 617 885 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 75 0 -------
Stage 1 198 0 -------
Stage 2 624 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 87.16 4.96 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 885 - 207 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.375 - 0.902 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.5 - 87.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - 7.2 - -
439
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 1030 75 120 660 27 36 251 118 27 267 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 1030 75 120 660 27 36 251 118 27 267 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 1084 79 126 695 28 38 264 124 28 281 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 27 1412 630 157 1670 745 47 315 148 34 448 27 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1560 1753 3497 1560 1753 1183 556 1767 1731 105 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 1084 79 126 695 28 38 0 388 28 0 298 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1560 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1738 1767 0 1836 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 24.2 2.2 6.4 11.7 0.6 1.9 0.0 19.0 1.4 0.0 13.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 24.2 2.2 6.4 11.7 0.6 1.9 0.0 19.0 1.4 0.0 13.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 27 1412 630 157 1670 745 47 0 464 34 0 475 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.77 0.13 0.80 0.42 0.04 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.83 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 194 1625 725 252 1741 776 116 0 596 78 0 589 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.4 23.3 10.0 40.4 15.4 7.1 43.8 0.0 31.3 44.2 0.0 29.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.4 2.6 0.2 3.7 0.4 0.0 11.3 0.0 10.8 16.8 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 9.3 1.0 2.7 4.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 9.0 0.8 0.0 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 66.8 25.9 10.2 44.1 15.8 7.1 55.0 0.0 42.1 61.0 0.0 32.6 LnGrp LOS ECBDBAE DE C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1186 849 426 326
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.7 19.7 43.3 35.0
Approach LOS C B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 41.5 7.4 28.4 6.4 48.2 6.7 29.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 42.0 6.0 29.0 10.0 45.0 4.0 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 26.2 3.9 15.0 3.2 13.7 3.4 21.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 9.0 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 27.6
HCM 7th LOS C
440
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 730 68 4 390 46 12
Future Vol, veh/h 730 68 4 390 46 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 793 74 4 424 50 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 868 0 1266 831
Stage 1 - - - - 831 -
Stage 2 - - - - 435 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 772 - 186 368
Stage 1 - - - - 426 -
Stage 2 - - - - 651 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 771 - 184 367
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 184 -
Stage 1 - - - - 425 -
Stage 2 - - - - 646 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.1 30.13

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 205 771 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.307 0.006 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 30.1 9.7 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0 - - -
441
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.7
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 393 34 186 599 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 393 34 186 599 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 409 35 194 624 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 194 194 0 -
Stage 1 194 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 793 845 - 0
Stage 1 837 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 793 845 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 793 - - -
Stage 1 837 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.9 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 793 845 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.516 0.042 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.3 9.4 -
HCM Lane LOS B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 0.1 -
442
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 168 16 7 0 629 0 240 32 246 109 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 168 16 7 0 629 0 240 32 246 109 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 227 183 17 0 0 693 0 261 35 267 118 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 0
Cap, veh/h 297 281 26 0 478 810 0 391 52 319 666 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.36 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1659 154 0 1841 3120 0 3196 412 1753 1841 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 0 200 0 0 693 0 146 150 267 118 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1813 0 1841 1560 0 1749 1767 1753 1841 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 5.9 6.0 10.9 3.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 5.9 6.0 10.9 3.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.23 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 297 0 308 0 478 810 0 220 223 319 666 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.66 0.67 0.84 0.18 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 661 0 684 0 583 988 0 518 524 638 1315 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.4 0.0 28.8 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.0 30.9 31.0 29.3 16.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.1 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 3.4 3.5 5.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 2.6 2.7 4.9 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.4 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 32.5 0.0 34.3 34.5 35.1 16.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 427 693 296 385
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.3 32.5 34.4 29.3
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.2 17.5 13.9 18.6 31.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.0 22.0 28.0 53.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.7 12.9 8.0 11.2 5.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.6 1.3 1.4 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 32.1
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 443
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 25 2 187 381 675 0 0 333 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 25 2 187 381 675 0 0 333 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 2 203 414 734 0 0 362 167
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 32 2 242 470 1241 0 0 412 190
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.27 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 186 14 1396 1767 1856 0 0 1201 554
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 232 0 0 414 734 0 0 0 529
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1595 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1756
Q Serve(g_s), s 9.4 0.0 0.0 15.1 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.4 0.0 0.0 15.1 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 Prop In Lane 0.12 0.87 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.32
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 276 0 0 470 1241 0 0 0 602
V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 309 0 0 633 1561 0 0 0 744
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.8 0.0 0.0 23.6 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.8 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 0.0 0.0 7.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.7 0.0 0.0 34.4 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.7 LnGrp LOS D C A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 232 1148 529
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.7 16.6 30.7
Approach LOS D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.6 49.4 21.8 27.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 56.4 24.0 28.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.4 16.5 17.1 21.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.9 0.8 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.8
HCM 7th LOS C
444
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 163 392 40 19 0 420 0 124 43 313 166 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 163 392 40 19 0 420 0 124 43 313 166 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 408 42 0 0 459 0 129 45 326 173 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 505 473 49 0 322 544 0 256 86 372 662 0
Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.36 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1654 170 0 1856 3136 0 2682 867 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 450 0 0 459 0 86 88 326 173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1825 0 1856 1568 0 1763 1694 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 3.9 4.2 15.0 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 3.9 4.2 15.0 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.51 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 505 0 521 0 322 544 0 174 167 372 662 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.49 0.52 0.88 0.26 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 713 0 736 0 385 651 0 460 442 566 1167 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 0.0 28.5 0.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 36.0 36.1 32.2 19.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 2.2 2.5 9.7 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.7 1.8 7.2 2.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.2 0.0 36.1 0.0 0.0 42.3 0.0 38.1 38.6 41.9 19.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS C D D D D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 620 459 174 499
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.9 42.3 38.4 34.1
Approach LOS CDDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.5 21.7 12.9 30.1 34.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 27.0 22.0 34.0 53.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.9 17.0 6.2 21.7 7.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.7 0.7 2.3 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 36.2
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 445
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 47 1 124 305 402 0 0 436 217 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 47 1 124 305 402 0 0 436 217 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 1 135 332 437 0 0 474 236
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 65 1 173 373 1300 0 0 505 251
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.21 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 443 9 1171 1767 1856 0 0 1169 582
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 0 0 332 437 0 0 0 710
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1623 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1751
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 0.0 0.0 12.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 0.0 0.0 12.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.1 Prop In Lane 0.27 0.72 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.33
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 240 0 0 373 1300 0 0 0 756
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 441 0 0 380 1339 0 0 0 787
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.7 0.0 0.0 26.8 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.1 0.0 0.0 48.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 LnGrp LOS C D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 187 769 710
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.1 23.3 37.4
Approach LOS C C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.3 53.5 18.8 34.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 50.4 15.0 31.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 8.4 14.7 29.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 2.9 0.0 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 30.6
HCM 7th LOS C
446
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 198 221 203 199 116 160 264 136
Average Queue (ft) 111 99 69 98 51 91 132 64
95th Queue (ft) 183 188 126 159 95 137 211 114
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 28
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 151 268 218 473
Average Queue (ft) 65 157 108 257
95th Queue (ft) 108 238 173 429
Link Distance (ft) 1268 263 263 1106
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 51 173 198 79 290 495 498 230 190 511 99 338 Average Queue (ft) 10 95 74 30 138 314 312 18 84 321 32 185 95th Queue (ft) 34 150 145 70 288 455 465 89 185 496 82 306 Link Distance (ft) 2511 2511 1359 1359 1106 1071
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 12 1 20 42 0 36 3 39
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 10 2 22 13 1 25 10 8
447
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement NW NE
Directions Served L LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 31 161
Average Queue (ft) 2 62
95th Queue (ft) 14 104
Link Distance (ft) 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB NB
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 242 150
Average Queue (ft) 90 15
95th Queue (ft) 172 87
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 129
448
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 370 584 203 200 75 158 276 162
Average Queue (ft) 136 264 77 52 32 76 205 81
95th Queue (ft) 302 470 145 102 63 137 290 143
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 7
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 14 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 14
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 227 268 139 767
Average Queue (ft) 70 167 72 433
95th Queue (ft) 158 255 125 715
Link Distance (ft) 1267 263 263 1104
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 209 334 331 210 175 252 250 71 190 321 99 275 Average Queue (ft) 26 210 209 49 91 115 91 13 43 177 33 162 95th Queue (ft) 91 311 308 166 146 188 179 47 115 249 89 260 Link Distance (ft) 2516 2516 1358 1358 1104 1073
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 21 37 0 0 10 0 18 1 40
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 27 1 0 3 1 6 4 11
449
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NW NE
Directions Served TR L T LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 31 53 94
Average Queue (ft) 5 3 2 43
95th Queue (ft) 35 16 17 88
Link Distance (ft) 882 154 1501
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 118
Average Queue (ft) 68
95th Queue (ft) 101
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 111
450
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [2046 No Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:45:34 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\3 Cumulative Year No Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
451
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 No Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 7 4.0 8 4.0 0.729 16.9 LOS C 10.3 264.6 0.75 0.93 1.42 32.7 18x R2 629 4.0 684 4.0 0.729 16.9 LOS C 10.3 264.6 0.75 0.93 1.42 32.3 Approach 636 4.0 691 4.0 0.729 16.9 LOS C 10.3 264.6 0.75 0.93 1.42 32.3 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 246 4.0 267 4.0 0.317 5.9 LOS A 1.5 37.5 0.06 0.01 0.06 29.2 6x T1 109 4.0 118 4.0 0.317 5.9 LOS A 1.5 37.5 0.06 0.01 0.06 29.3 Approach 355 4.0 386 4.0 0.317 5.9 LOS A 1.5 37.5 0.06 0.01 0.06 29.2 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 209 4.0 227 4.0 0.421 8.2 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.44 0.38 0.44 30.9 4x T1 168 4.0 183 4.0 0.421 8.2 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.44 0.38 0.44 31.1 14x R2 16 4.0 17 4.0 0.421 8.2 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.44 0.38 0.44 30.5 Approach 393 4.0 427 4.0 0.421 8.2 LOS A 1.8 45.4 0.44 0.38 0.44 31.0 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 240 4.0 261 4.0 0.365 8.8 LOS A 1.8 47.4 0.63 0.61 0.63 29.1 12x R2 32 4.0 35 4.0 0.365 8.8 LOS A 1.8 47.4 0.63 0.61 0.63 28.5 Approach 272 4.0 296 4.0 0.365 8.8 LOS A 1.8 47.4 0.63 0.61 0.63 29.1 All Vehicles 1656 4.0 1800 4.0 0.729 11.2 LOS B 10.3 264.6 0.51 0.55 0.76 30.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:45:14 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\3 Cumulative Year No Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
452
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 No Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 19 3.0 20 3.0 0.428 8.0 LOS A 1.9 49.8 0.42 0.33 0.42 37.8 18x R2 420 3.0 438 3.0 0.428 8.0 LOS A 1.9 49.8 0.42 0.33 0.42 37.3 Approach 439 3.0 457 3.0 0.428 8.0 LOS A 1.9 49.8 0.42 0.33 0.42 37.3 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 313 3.0 326 3.0 0.409 7.0 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.8 6x T1 166 3.0 173 3.0 0.409 7.0 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 29.0 Approach 479 3.0 499 3.0 0.409 7.0 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.9 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 163 3.0 170 3.0 0.652 13.9 LOS B 6.8 175.2 0.66 0.82 1.13 29.1 4x T1 392 3.0 408 3.0 0.652 13.9 LOS B 6.8 175.2 0.66 0.82 1.13 29.2 14x R2 40 3.0 42 3.0 0.652 13.9 LOS B 6.8 175.2 0.66 0.82 1.13 28.7 Approach 595 3.0 620 3.0 0.652 13.9 LOS B 6.8 175.2 0.66 0.82 1.13 29.2 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 124 3.0 129 3.0 0.281 9.5 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.76 0.75 0.76 28.9 12x R2 43 3.0 45 3.0 0.281 9.5 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.76 0.75 0.76 28.3 Approach 167 3.0 174 3.0 0.281 9.5 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.76 0.75 0.76 28.7 All Vehicles 1680 3.0 1750 3.0 0.652 9.9 LOS A 6.8 175.2 0.44 0.46 0.61 30.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:45:17 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\3 Cumulative Year No Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
453
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [2046 No Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, May 19, 2025 6:05:03 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\Multilane 454
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 No Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 25 3.0 27 3.0 0.344 9.8 LOS A 1.4 34.9 0.60 0.62 0.71 36.5 8x T1 2 3.0 2 3.0 0.344 9.8 LOS A 1.4 34.9 0.60 0.62 0.71 36.6 18x R2 187 3.0 203 3.0 0.344 9.8 LOS A 1.4 34.9 0.60 0.62 0.71 36.0 Approach 214 3.0 233 3.0 0.344 9.8 LOS A 1.4 34.9 0.60 0.62 0.71 36.1 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 333 3.0 362 3.0 0.526 10.1 LOS B 3.5 89.8 0.52 0.55 0.69 28.7 16x R2 154 3.0 167 3.0 0.526 10.1 LOS B 3.5 89.8 0.52 0.55 0.69 28.1 Approach 487 3.0 529 3.0 0.526 10.1 LOS B 3.5 89.8 0.52 0.55 0.69 28.5 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 381 3.0 414 3.0 0.334 6.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.1 2x T1 675 3.0 734 3.0 0.512 7.7 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.9 Approach 1056 3.0 1148 3.0 0.512 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 All Vehicles 1757 3.0 1910 3.0 0.526 8.3 LOS A 3.5 89.8 0.22 0.23 0.28 31.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:53:29 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\Multilane Roundabout\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
455
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 No Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 47 3.0 51 3.0 0.231 6.9 LOS A 0.7 17.5 0.44 0.44 0.44 38.0 8x T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.231 6.9 LOS A 0.7 17.5 0.44 0.44 0.44 38.1 18x R2 124 3.0 135 3.0 0.231 6.9 LOS A 0.7 17.5 0.44 0.44 0.44 37.4 Approach 172 3.0 187 3.0 0.231 6.9 LOS A 0.7 17.5 0.44 0.44 0.44 37.6 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 436 3.0 474 3.0 0.685 14.1 LOS B 8.3 212.7 0.60 0.76 1.06 27.2 16x R2 217 3.0 236 3.0 0.685 14.1 LOS B 8.3 212.7 0.60 0.76 1.06 26.7 Approach 653 3.0 710 3.0 0.685 14.1 LOS B 8.3 212.7 0.60 0.76 1.06 27.1 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 305 3.0 332 3.0 0.251 4.9 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.1 2x T1 402 3.0 437 3.0 0.305 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.9 Approach 707 3.0 768 3.0 0.305 5.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.1 All Vehicles 1532 3.0 1665 3.0 0.685 9.1 LOS A 8.3 212.7 0.30 0.37 0.50 30.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, May 19, 2025 6:04:43 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\Multilane Roundabout\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
456
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 112 846 183 30
Average Queue (ft) 54 472 60 3
95th Queue (ft) 98 863 130 18
Link Distance (ft) 1233 844 619 149
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 54 201 199 188
Average Queue (ft) 26 109 117 91
95th Queue (ft) 57 213 212 168
Link Distance (ft) 1216 149 149 1046
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 31
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 50
457
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 No Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 530 105 79 98
Average Queue (ft) 218 44 39 19
95th Queue (ft) 439 80 73 64
Link Distance (ft) 1233 844 619 149
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 52 90 85 466
Average Queue (ft) 22 29 20 176
95th Queue (ft) 50 71 63 377
Link Distance (ft) 1216 149 149 1045
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
458
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | I
(559) 570-8991
Appendix I: Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions 459
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 246.8
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 209 222 16 14 0 744 0 240 39 340 109 0 Future Vol, veh/h 209 222 16 14 0 744 0 240 39 340 109 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 227 241 17 15 0 809 0 261 42 370 118 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 169 464.5 55.9 75.2

HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 2% 47% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 50% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 14% 98% 4% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 279 758 447 340 109
LT Vol 0 14 209 340 0
Through Vol 240 0 222 0 109
RT Vol 39 744 16 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 303 824 486 370 118
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.815 1.964 1.247 1.012 0.308
Departure Headway (Hd) 13.266 9.388 11.823 12.411 11.881 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 276 395 311 296 304
Service Time 11.266 7.388 9.823 10.111 9.581
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.098 2.086 1.563 1.25 0.388
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 55.9 464.5 169 93 19.8
HCM Lane LOS FFFFC
HCM 95th-tile Q 6.5 51.7 17.5 10.7 1.3
460
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 125.9
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 60 2 187 424 747 0 0 392 154
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 60 2 187 424 747 0 0 392 154
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 65 2 203 461 812 0 0 426 167
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2160 2327 812 593 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1734 1734 -------
Stage 2 426 593 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 52 37 377 978 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 155 141 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 657 492 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 27 0 377 978 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 27 0 -------
Stage 1 82 0 -------
Stage 2 657 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v $ 973.41 4.32 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 978 - 92 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.471 - 2.941 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 -$ 973.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 - 26.2 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 461
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 335 97 127 1412 30 92 420 174 20 333 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 335 97 127 1412 30 92 420 174 20 333 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 364 105 138 1535 33 100 457 189 22 362 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 16 1230 548 165 1526 681 124 454 188 27 541 33 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.07 0.37 0.37 0.02 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1558 1753 3497 1560 1753 1235 511 1767 1731 105 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 364 105 138 1535 33 100 0 646 22 0 384 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1558 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1746 1767 0 1836 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 8.8 5.5 9.0 51.0 1.2 6.6 0.0 43.0 1.5 0.0 21.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 8.8 5.5 9.0 51.0 1.2 6.6 0.0 43.0 1.5 0.0 21.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 16 1230 548 165 1526 681 124 0 642 27 0 574 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.30 0.19 0.84 1.01 0.05 0.81 0.00 1.01 0.83 0.00 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 45 1230 548 255 1526 681 150 0 642 45 0 574 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.8 27.4 26.3 52.0 32.9 12.8 53.5 0.0 36.9 57.4 0.0 34.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 33.6 0.3 0.4 7.9 24.4 0.1 19.3 0.0 36.9 20.4 0.0 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.6 2.1 4.2 24.5 0.5 3.5 0.0 24.3 0.8 0.0 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 91.4 27.7 26.7 59.9 57.3 12.9 72.9 0.0 73.8 77.8 0.0 38.9 LnGrp LOS F C C E F B E F E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 483 1706 746 406
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.3 56.7 73.7 41.0
Approach LOS C E E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 46.1 13.3 41.5 6.1 56.0 6.8 48.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 37.0 10.0 36.0 3.0 51.0 3.0 43.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.0 10.8 8.6 23.2 2.9 53.0 3.5 45.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.9 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 54.6
HCM 7th LOS D
462
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 390 47 4 547 121 35
Future Vol, veh/h 390 47 4 547 121 35
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 406 49 4 570 126 36
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 456 0 1010 432
Stage 1 - - - - 432 -
Stage 2 - - - - 578 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1099 - 265 622
Stage 1 - - - - 653 -
Stage 2 - - - - 559 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1098 - 263 621
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 263 -
Stage 1 - - - - 652 -
Stage 2 - - - - 557 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 29.89

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 303 1098 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.537 0.004 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 29.9 8.3 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 0 - - -
463
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.6
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 555 44 147 296 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 555 44 147 296 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 561 44 148 299 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 148 148 0 -
Stage 1 148 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 6.24 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 3.336 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 839 893 - 0
Stage 1 874 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 839 893 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 839 - - -
Stage 1 874 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.88 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 839 893 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.668 0.05 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 17.5 9.2 -
HCM Lane LOS C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.3 0.2 -
464
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th AWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak
1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 150.8
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 435 40 29 0 512 0 124 49 371 166 0 Future Vol, veh/h 163 435 40 29 0 512 0 124 49 371 166 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 453 42 30 0 533 0 129 51 386 173 0
Number of Lanes 010010010110
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 271.4 140.8 24.8 58.1

HCM LOS F F C F
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 26% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 72% 0% 68% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 28% 95% 6% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 173 541 638 371 166
LT Vol 0 29 163 371 0
Through Vol 124 0 435 0 166
RT Vol 49 512 40 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 180 564 665 386 173
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.473 1.204 1.525 0.973 0.412
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.73 8.837 8.815 10.527 10.002
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 310 417 419 348 363
Service Time 9.73 6.837 6.815 8.227 7.702
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 1.353 1.587 1.109 0.477
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 24.8 140.8 271.4 75.3 19.5
HCM Lane LOS C F F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.4 19.7 33.7 10.6 2
465
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak
2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 40.8
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 61 1 124 349 450 0 0 480 217
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 61 1 124 349 450 0 0 480 217
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 100 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 66 1 135 379 489 0 0 522 236
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1770 2005 489 758 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1248 1248 -------
Stage 2 522 758 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 91 59 577 849 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 269 244 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 593 414 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 50 0 577 849 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 50 0 -------
Stage 1 149 0 -------
Stage 2 593 0 -------
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v $ 345.64 5.51 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 849 - 130 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.447 - 1.557 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.6 -$ 345.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.3 - 14.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 466
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 1030 90 130 660 27 44 273 133 27 284 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 1030 90 130 660 27 44 273 133 27 284 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 1084 95 137 695 28 46 287 140 28 299 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 341 1362 608 167 1016 453 58 332 162 34 471 27 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3497 1560 1753 3497 1560 1753 1167 569 1767 1738 99 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 1084 95 137 695 28 46 0 427 28 0 316 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1749 1560 1753 1749 1560 1753 0 1736 1767 0 1837 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 26.0 2.9 7.3 16.7 1.2 2.5 0.0 22.1 1.5 0.0 14.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 26.0 2.9 7.3 16.7 1.2 2.5 0.0 22.1 1.5 0.0 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.05
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 341 1362 608 167 1016 453 58 0 494 34 0 498 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.80 0.16 0.82 0.68 0.06 0.79 0.00 0.86 0.82 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 341 1513 675 222 1771 790 111 0 605 75 0 601 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 25.6 11.2 42.1 29.8 24.3 45.5 0.0 32.1 46.3 0.0 30.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 3.5 0.3 12.4 1.8 0.1 8.7 0.0 13.0 16.4 0.0 3.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 10.3 1.3 3.5 6.6 0.5 1.2 0.0 10.7 0.8 0.0 6.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 31.2 29.1 11.5 54.5 31.5 24.4 54.1 0.0 45.2 62.7 0.0 33.5 LnGrp LOS CCBDCCD DE C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1202 860 473 344
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.7 35.0 46.0 35.8
Approach LOS CCDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 41.9 8.1 30.7 23.4 32.5 6.8 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 41.0 6.0 31.0 5.0 48.0 4.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.3 28.0 4.5 16.4 3.0 18.7 3.5 24.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 8.8 0.0 2.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 33.9
HCM 7th LOS C
467
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 747 68 8 405 57 24
Future Vol, veh/h 747 68 8 405 57 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 812 74 9 440 62 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 887 0 1310 850
Stage 1 - - - - 850 -
Stage 2 - - - - 460 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 175 359
Stage 1 - - - - 417 -
Stage 2 - - - - 634 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 172 359
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 172 -
Stage 1 - - - - 417 -
Stage 2 - - - - 625 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.19 35.52

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 204 759 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.433 0.011 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 35.5 9.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS E A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 0 - - -
468
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak
5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp 05/19/2025
Baseline Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.2
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 412 34 207 607 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 412 34 207 607 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Yield - Free - None
Storage Length 0 100 - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 429 35 216 632 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 216 216 0 -
Stage 1 216 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 6.23 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 3.327 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 822 - 0
Stage 1 818 - - 0
Stage 2 - - - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 770 822 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 770 - - -
Stage 1 818 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.94 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 770 822 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.557 0.043 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.4 9.6 -
HCM Lane LOS C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.5 0.1 -
469
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 209 222 16 14 0 744 0 240 39 340 109 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 209 222 16 14 0 744 0 240 39 340 109 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 227 241 17 0 0 825 0 261 42 370 118 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 0
Cap, veh/h 303 294 21 0 515 873 0 354 56 412 722 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.24 0.39 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1699 120 0 1841 3120 0 3115 480 1753 1841 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 227 0 258 0 0 825 0 150 153 370 118 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1819 0 1841 1560 0 1749 1754 1753 1841 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 8.3 8.5 20.5 4.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.3 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 8.3 8.5 20.5 4.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.27 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 303 0 315 0 515 873 0 205 205 412 722 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.73 0.75 0.90 0.16 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 533 0 553 0 517 877 0 385 386 701 1215 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.3 0.0 39.8 0.0 0.0 35.2 0.0 42.6 42.7 37.1 19.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.7 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 5.0 5.4 8.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 3.8 3.9 9.5 1.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.0 0.0 45.1 0.0 0.0 53.7 0.0 47.6 48.1 45.5 19.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 485 825 303 488
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.1 53.7 47.8 39.3
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 32.9 27.5 16.3 23.3 43.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.1 40.0 22.0 30.4 66.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 27.9 22.5 10.5 15.7 6.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 47.3
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 470
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 2 187 424 747 0 0 392 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 2 187 424 747 0 0 392 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 2 203 461 812 0 0 426 167
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 66 2 205 502 1287 0 0 454 178
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.28 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 389 12 1216 1767 1856 0 0 1269 497
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 270 0 0 461 812 0 0 0 593
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1617 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1766
Q Serve(g_s), s 12.8 0.0 0.0 19.5 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.8 0.0 0.0 19.5 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 Prop In Lane 0.24 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.28
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 273 0 0 502 1287 0 0 0 632
V/C Ratio(X) 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 273 0 0 550 1358 0 0 0 651
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 51.6 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.4 0.0 0.0 10.3 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 83.5 0.0 0.0 46.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.1 LnGrp LOS F D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 270 1273 593
Approach Delay, s/veh 83.5 21.4 45.1
Approach LOS F C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 58.1 25.9 32.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 56.4 24.0 28.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.8 20.4 21.5 27.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.9 0.4 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 35.9
HCM 7th LOS D
471
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 390 47 4 547 121 35
Future Vol, veh/h 390 47 4 547 121 35
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 100
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 406 49 4 570 126 36
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 456 0 1010 432
Stage 1 - - - - 432 -
Stage 2 - - - - 578 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1099 - 265 622
Stage 1 - - - - 653 -
Stage 2 - - - - 559 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1098 - 263 621
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 263 -
Stage 1 - - - - 652 -
Stage 2 - - - - 557 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 26.23

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NELn2 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 263 621 1098 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.478 0.059 0.004 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 30.6 11.2 8.3 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.4 0.2 0 - - -
472
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp 05/19/2025 Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 163 435 40 29 0 512 0 124 49 371 166 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 163 435 40 29 0 512 0 124 49 371 166 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 453 42 0 0 565 0 129 51 386 173 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 518 490 45 0 372 629 0 205 77 426 669 0
Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.36 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1672 155 0 1856 3137 0 2591 944 1767 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 495 0 0 565 0 89 91 386 173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1827 0 1856 1569 0 1763 1679 1767 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 5.2 5.6 22.6 7.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 5.2 5.6 22.6 7.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.56 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 518 0 536 0 372 629 0 145 138 426 669 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.62 0.66 0.91 0.26 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 565 0 584 0 403 681 0 365 347 688 1176 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.4 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.0 41.5 0.0 47.2 47.4 39.2 24.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 4.2 5.3 10.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.2 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 2.4 2.5 10.8 3.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 29.8 0.0 56.1 0.0 0.0 55.7 0.0 51.4 52.6 49.4 24.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS C E E DDDC
Approach Vol, veh/h 665 565 180 559
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.4 55.7 52.0 41.6
Approach LOS D E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.2 29.6 13.3 37.2 43.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.1 41.4 22.0 34.0 67.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.7 24.6 7.6 29.9 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.1 0.7 1.3 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 49.2
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 473
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 61 1 124 349 450 0 0 480 217 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 61 1 124 349 450 0 0 480 217 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 1 135 379 489 0 0 522 236
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333330033
Cap, veh/h 56 1 115 419 1401 0 0 563 254
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 533 8 1091 1767 1856 0 0 1210 547
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 202 0 0 379 489 0 0 0 758
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1632 0 0 1767 1856 0 0 0 1757
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.8 Prop In Lane 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 172 0 0 419 1401 0 0 0 817
V/C Ratio(X) 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 172 0 0 443 1502 0 0 0 889
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.9 0.0 0.0 28.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 122.9 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 156.8 0.0 0.0 49.4 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.9 LnGrp LOS F D A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 202 868 758
Approach Delay, s/veh 156.8 23.4 33.9
Approach LOS F C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 61.9 22.0 39.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 4.6 4.0 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 61.4 19.0 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 8.7 17.8 32.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.4 0.2 2.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 42.5
HCM 7th LOS D
474
Section 10, Item E
HCM 7th TWSC Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak
4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 05/19/2025
Improved Synchro 12 Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 747 68 8 405 57 24
Future Vol, veh/h 747 68 8 405 57 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 2 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 75 - 0 100
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 812 74 9 440 62 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 887 0 1310 850
Stage 1 - - - - 850 -
Stage 2 - - - - 460 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 175 359
Stage 1 - - - - 417 -
Stage 2 - - - - 634 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 172 359
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 172 -
Stage 1 - - - - 417 -
Stage 2 - - - - 625 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.19 30.87

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NELn2 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 172 359 759 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.36 0.073 0.011 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 37.2 15.8 9.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS E C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.2 0 - - -
475
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 221 266 272 200 149 248 272 116
Average Queue (ft) 148 152 133 145 75 148 226 60
95th Queue (ft) 223 262 245 209 125 237 306 115
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 13
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 8 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 31 77
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 255 276 254 662
Average Queue (ft) 117 209 126 350
95th Queue (ft) 213 292 217 546
Link Distance (ft) 1268 263 263 1106
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 53 180 160 95 290 651 616 230 190 739 99 324 Average Queue (ft) 13 93 83 39 167 364 342 25 123 450 26 205 95th Queue (ft) 42 148 136 69 328 575 551 137 235 674 72 316 Link Distance (ft) 2511 2511 1359 1359 1106 1071
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 17 2 1 24 44 1 52 4 45
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 17 3 4 30 13 6 48 12 9
476
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement NE NE
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 199 67
Average Queue (ft) 71 27
95th Queue (ft) 140 53
Link Distance (ft) 1502
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB NB
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 317 150
Average Queue (ft) 109 10
95th Queue (ft) 205 72
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 290
477
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE SE NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L TR LTR R T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 370 718 285 199 96 120 277 156
Average Queue (ft) 203 419 104 79 47 67 212 81
95th Queue (ft) 434 719 208 145 87 115 297 143
Link Distance (ft) 1284 882 674 674 263 263
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 37 10 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 60 27 4
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 222 269 138 661
Average Queue (ft) 103 201 65 305
95th Queue (ft) 182 296 118 529
Link Distance (ft) 1267 263 263 1104
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Merced Street & Golden State Boulevard Movement SE SE SE SE NW NW NW NW NE NE SW SW
Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 210 371 391 210 160 277 292 53 190 418 99 297 Average Queue (ft) 54 214 211 71 91 143 127 16 63 204 33 164 95th Queue (ft) 161 324 326 196 144 230 232 45 157 347 88 251 Link Distance (ft) 2516 2516 1358 1358 1104 1073
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 60 230 70 140 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 23 40 1 1 19 0 0 20 2 40
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 36 4 1 5 0 0 9 5 11
478
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 4: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue
Movement SE NW NE NE
Directions Served TR T L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 24 53 121 109
Average Queue (ft) 1 3 49 25
95th Queue (ft) 8 21 90 71
Link Distance (ft) 882 142 1502
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0
Intersection: 5: Fowler Avenue & SR 99 SB On-Ramp
Movement NB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 135
Average Queue (ft) 62
95th Queue (ft) 102
Link Distance (ft) 1339
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 196
479
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [2046 + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:48:24 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
480
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 14 4.0 15 4.0 0.880 28.7 LOS D 21.5 555.8 0.94 1.37 2.35 27.8 18x R2 744 4.0 809 4.0 0.880 28.7 LOS D 21.5 555.8 0.94 1.37 2.35 27.5 Approach 758 4.0 824 4.0 0.880 28.7 LOS D 21.5 555.8 0.94 1.37 2.35 27.6 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 340 4.0 370 4.0 0.404 7.0 LOS A 2.2 57.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.7 6x T1 109 4.0 118 4.0 0.404 7.0 LOS A 2.2 57.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.8 Approach 449 4.0 488 4.0 0.404 7.0 LOS A 2.2 57.8 0.10 0.03 0.10 28.7 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 209 4.0 227 4.0 0.514 10.3 LOS B 3.5 89.1 0.56 0.61 0.76 30.1 4x T1 222 4.0 241 4.0 0.514 10.3 LOS B 3.5 89.1 0.56 0.61 0.76 30.4 14x R2 16 4.0 17 4.0 0.514 10.3 LOS B 3.5 89.1 0.56 0.61 0.76 29.7 Approach 447 4.0 486 4.0 0.514 10.3 LOS B 3.5 89.1 0.56 0.61 0.76 30.2 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 240 4.0 261 4.0 0.446 11.7 LOS B 3.0 77.3 0.77 0.84 0.94 28.1 12x R2 39 4.0 42 4.0 0.446 11.7 LOS B 3.0 77.3 0.77 0.84 0.94 27.5 Approach 279 4.0 303 4.0 0.446 11.7 LOS B 3.0 77.3 0.77 0.84 0.94 28.0 All Vehicles 1933 4.0 2101 4.0 0.880 17.0 LOS C 21.5 555.8 0.63 0.80 1.26 28.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:48:19 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
481
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 + Project - SR 99 SB off-ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: Fowler Ave
3x L2 29 3.0 30 3.0 0.530 9.8 LOS A 3.1 80.1 0.48 0.40 0.52 36.7 18x R2 512 3.0 533 3.0 0.530 9.8 LOS A 3.1 80.1 0.48 0.40 0.52 36.2 Approach 541 3.0 564 3.0 0.530 9.8 LOS A 3.1 80.1 0.48 0.40 0.52 36.2 NorthEast: Merced St
1x L2 371 3.0 386 3.0 0.462 7.8 LOS A 2.3 58.7 0.14 0.05 0.14 28.5 6x T1 166 3.0 173 3.0 0.462 7.8 LOS A 2.3 58.7 0.14 0.05 0.14 28.6 Approach 537 3.0 559 3.0 0.462 7.8 LOS A 2.3 58.7 0.14 0.05 0.14 28.5 NorthWest: SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
7x L2 163 3.0 170 3.0 0.738 18.1 LOS C 9.9 254.7 0.77 1.07 1.52 27.6 4x T1 435 3.0 453 3.0 0.738 18.1 LOS C 9.9 254.7 0.77 1.07 1.52 27.7 14x R2 40 3.0 42 3.0 0.738 18.1 LOS C 9.9 254.7 0.77 1.07 1.52 27.2 Approach 638 3.0 665 3.0 0.738 18.1 LOS C 9.9 254.7 0.77 1.07 1.52 27.7 SouthWest: Sumner Ave
2x T1 124 3.0 129 3.0 0.342 12.1 LOS B 2.1 53.8 0.84 0.85 0.85 27.9 12x R2 49 3.0 51 3.0 0.342 12.1 LOS B 2.1 53.8 0.84 0.85 0.85 27.4 Approach 173 3.0 180 3.0 0.342 12.1 LOS B 2.1 53.8 0.84 0.85 0.85 27.8 All Vehicles 1889 3.0 1968 3.0 0.738 12.2 LOS B 9.9 254.7 0.51 0.57 0.78 29.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:48:22 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\1 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB Ramps\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Merced Street.sip9
482
Section 10, Item E

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 1 [2046 + Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:42:29 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\2 SR 99 483
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 + Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St AM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 60 3.0 65 3.0 0.424 11.9 LOS B 2.0 50.8 0.65 0.71 0.91 35.1 8x T1 2 3.0 2 3.0 0.424 11.9 LOS B 2.0 50.8 0.65 0.71 0.91 35.2 18x R2 187 3.0 203 3.0 0.424 11.9 LOS B 2.0 50.8 0.65 0.71 0.91 34.6 Approach 249 3.0 271 3.0 0.424 11.9 LOS B 2.0 50.8 0.65 0.71 0.91 34.7 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 392 3.0 426 3.0 0.623 12.9 LOS B 6.0 152.7 0.64 0.80 1.05 27.7 16x R2 154 3.0 167 3.0 0.623 12.9 LOS B 6.0 152.7 0.64 0.80 1.05 27.1 Approach 546 3.0 593 3.0 0.623 12.9 LOS B 6.0 152.7 0.64 0.80 1.05 27.5 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 424 3.0 461 3.0 0.371 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.1 2x T1 747 3.0 812 3.0 0.567 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.9 Approach 1171 3.0 1273 3.0 0.567 7.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.3 All Vehicles 1966 3.0 2137 3.0 0.623 9.7 LOS A 6.0 152.7 0.26 0.31 0.41 31.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:49:55 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
484
Section 10, Item E

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2046 + Project SR 99 NB ramp at Merced St PM (Site Folder: General)]
Site Category: -
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
SouthEast: NB off-ramp
3x L2 61 3.0 66 3.0 0.260 7.5 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.48 0.48 0.48 37.5 8x T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.260 7.5 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.48 0.48 0.48 37.6 18x R2 124 3.0 135 3.0 0.260 7.5 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.48 0.48 0.48 36.9 Approach 186 3.0 202 3.0 0.260 7.5 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.48 0.48 0.48 37.1 NorthEast: Merced St
6x T1 480 3.0 522 3.0 0.756 17.5 LOS C 11.6 296.9 0.71 1.00 1.43 26.1 16x R2 217 3.0 236 3.0 0.756 17.5 LOS C 11.6 296.9 0.71 1.00 1.43 25.7 Approach 697 3.0 758 3.0 0.756 17.5 LOS C 11.6 296.9 0.71 1.00 1.43 26.0 SouthWest: Merced St
5x L2 349 3.0 379 3.0 0.286 5.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.1 2x T1 450 3.0 489 3.0 0.341 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.9 Approach 799 3.0 868 3.0 0.341 5.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.1 All Vehicles 1682 3.0 1828 3.0 0.756 10.7 LOS B 11.6 296.9 0.35 0.47 0.65 29.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JLB TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, May 19, 2025 5:50:41 PM Project: Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\SIDRA\2 Merced Ave at SR 99 SB off-ramp\4 Cumulative Year plus Project\2 SR 99 NB Ramps Merced Street.sip9
485
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project AM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 217 854 282 67
Average Queue (ft) 105 681 97 7
95th Queue (ft) 205 1063 201 35
Link Distance (ft) 1234 844 619 149
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 33
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 91 187 190 418
Average Queue (ft) 41 90 106 199
95th Queue (ft) 74 169 203 384
Link Distance (ft) 1216 149 149 1046
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 32
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 71
486
Section 10, Item E
Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project PM Peak Improved 05/19/2025
Improved SimTraffic Report
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Intersection: 1: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Movement SE NW NE SW
Directions Served LTR LR TR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 1273 166 165 105
Average Queue (ft) 1053 63 60 17
95th Queue (ft) 1666 119 118 59
Link Distance (ft) 1234 844 619 149
Upstream Blk Time (%) 68
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Merced Street & SR 99 NB Ramps
Movement NW NE NE SW
Directions Served LTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 93 123 88 537
Average Queue (ft) 26 38 22 264
95th Queue (ft) 64 90 68 492
Link Distance (ft) 1216 149 149 1045
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
487
Section 10, Item E
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | J
(559) 570-8991
Appendix J: Traffic Signal Warrants
488
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing Traffic Conditions

1. SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Merced St
Highest
Approach
Volume =
320 (382) VPH
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Total of Both Approaches =
659 (553) VPH
489
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing Traffic Conditions

2. SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 NB
Ramps
Highest
Approach
Volume =
168 (135) VPH
Merced St Total of Both Approaches =
1202 (1057) VPH
490
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing Traffic Conditions

4. Fresno Street / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Fresno Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
118 (57) VPH
Fowler Ave Total of Both Approaches =
560 (630) VPH
491
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing Traffic Conditions

5. SR 99 SB On-Ramp / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Minor Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
266 (211) VPH
Major Street Total of Both Approaches =
282 (381) VPH
492
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions

1. SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Merced St
Highest
Approach
Volume =
414 (440) VPH
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Total of Both Approaches =
835 (698) VPH
493
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions

2. SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 NB
Ramps
Highest
Approach
Volume =
203 (149) VPH
Merced St Total of Both Approaches =
1376 (1193) VPH
494
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions

4. Fresno Street / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Fresno Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
146 (80) VPH
Fowler Ave Total of Both Approaches =
589 (666) VPH
495
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions

5. SR 99 SB On-Ramp / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 SB OnRamp
Highest
Approach
Volume =
289 (230) VPH
Fowler Avenue Total of Both Approaches =
303(410) VPH
496
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions

1. SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Merced St
Highest
Approach
Volume =
430 (487) VPH
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Total of Both Approaches =
953 (845) VPH
497
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions

2. SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 NB
Ramps
Highest
Approach
Volume =
204 (152) VPH
Merced St Total of Both Approaches =
1501 (1306) VPH
498
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions

4. Fresno Street / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Fresno Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
146 (80) VPH
Fowler Ave Total of Both Approaches =
720 (844) VPH
499
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions

5. SR 99 SB On-Ramp / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Minor Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
338(302) VPH
Major Street Total of Both Approaches =
393(525) VPH
500
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions

1. SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Merced St
Highest
Approach
Volume =
355 (479) VPH
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Total of Both Approaches =
1029 (1034) VPH
501
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions

2. SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 NB
Ramps
Highest
Approach
Volume =
214 (172) VPH
Merced St Total of Both Approaches =
1543 (1360) VPH
502
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions

4. Fresno Street / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Not Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Fresno Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
128 (58) VPH
Fowler Ave Total of Both Approaches =
959 (1192) VPH
503
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions

5. SR 99 SB On-Ramp / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Minor Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
406 (427) VPH
Major Street Total of Both Approaches =
592 (785) VPH
504
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions

1. SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Merced St
Highest
Approach
Volume =
449 (537) VPH
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp Total of Both Approaches =
1205 (1179) VPH
505
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions

2. SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced St
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
SR 99 NB
Ramps
Highest
Approach
Volume =
249 (186) VPH
Merced St Total of Both Approaches =
1717 (1496) VPH
506
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions

4. Fresno Street / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Fresno Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
156 (81) VPH
Fowler Ave Total of Both Approaches =
988 (1228) VPH
507
Section 10, Item E
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
www.JLBtraffic.com Fresno, CA 93704
[email protected] (559) 570-8991
Warrant 3: Peak Hour (Rural)
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions

5. SR 99 SB On-Ramp / Fowler Ave
AM (PM) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
PM Peak Hour – Signal Warrant is Met
Source: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2014 Edition) Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Minor Street
Highest
Approach
Volume =
443 (446) VPH
Major Street Total of Both Approaches =
599 (814) VPH
508
Section 10, Item E
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 365-5140 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
June 20, 2025
FRE-99-10.94
City of Fowler
NWC C-Store & Fuel
GTS #: 35683

SENT VIA EMAIL
Mr. Matthew Arndt
JLB Traffic
515 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 103
Fresno, CA 93710
Dear Mr. Arndt:

Caltrans has completed its review of the Traffic Impact Study for the proposed NWC CStore and Fuel Station project, located at the northwest corner of South Fowler Avenue and West Fresno Street, on the west side of State Route (SR) 99 in the City of Fowler. This letter supersedes Caltrans' previous comment letter dated June 18, 2025, and replaces it in its entirety.

Caltrans provides the following comments about the proposed project:

SR 99 Ramp Intersections – Safety and Congestion Risks
The intersections of the SR 99 southbound off-ramp at Merced Street and the SR 99 northbound ramps at Merced Street are projected to experience significant operational delays and capacity constraints under both near-term and cumulative scenarios. This raises substantial concerns regarding intersection performance, queuing, and overall traffic operations at these ramp terminals:
• Queuing/Spillback: Observed and projected delays exceed thresholds that risk queue spillback onto mainline SR 99.
• ISOAP Required: Caltrans has determined through previous evaluations that roundabouts are the only feasible long-term solution for both the northbound and southbound SR 99 ramp intersections at Merced Avenue due to the existing operational deficiencies and geometric limitations that preclude signalized solutions. As such, the ISOAP will serve to document and validate the roundabout alternative and support conceptual layout development and fair share coordination.

While Caltrans policy requires completion of an ISOAP prior to implementing intersection improvements, this process will function in this case to confirm and refine the roundabout strategy, not to weigh signalized alternatives that have already been deemed infeasible.

Furthermore, Caltrans acknowledges that while the proposed development is not independently constructing these improvements, it will contribute a proportional and fair share toward their implementation.
509
Section 10, Item E
Attachment 9: Caltrans Comment Letter
Mr. Matthew Arndt – NWC C-Store & Fuel
June 20, 2025

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” The roundabout improvements should be reflected in the Cumulative + Project roadway network, and the TIA should be revised to explicitly identify them as the only feasible mitigation and incorporate their configurations into the Cumulative + Project scenario network.

Therefore, Caltrans recommends that the lead agency, in coordination with Caltrans District 6, take the lead in initiating and preparing the ISOAP as part of the broader effort to advance the roundabout improvements as a regional or capital infrastructure project.

Given that the proposed development contributes to conditions necessitating the roundabouts, Caltrans will only support the project if fair share contributions toward their implementation are clearly defined and secured through binding mechanisms such as a development agreement, capital improvement program, or fee structure administered by the lead agency in coordination with Caltrans.

While roundabouts are the only feasible long-term solution at the SR 99 ramp intersections, the timing of their implementation will depend on regional capital programming, funding availability, and project readiness. Caltrans recognizes that the proposed development is not solely responsible for constructing these improvements; however, its fair share contribution is necessary to support future delivery. Therefore, Caltrans does not require construction of the roundabouts as a condition for project approval but does require that the applicant’s fair share contribution be secured in advance, through a development agreement or fee mechanism coordinated with the lead agency and Caltrans.

Intersection Improvement Feasibility
The conceptual roundabout improvements at the SR 99 ramp intersections may face constraints related to existing structures, utilities, and planned bikeways. For example, geometric limitations along Merced Street may require design exceptions for shoulder widths, lane widths, and bikeway clearances.

Preliminary roundabout layouts should be developed and submitted by the lead agency, in coordination with Caltrans, as part of the ISOAP process. These layouts are intended to inform design feasibility and multimodal compatibility and are not required prior to project approval, as long as the applicant’s fair share contribution is secured.

Access Management – Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street
The project proposes three full-access driveways, including two closely spaced on Fowler Avenue.
• Caltrans recommends revisiting the driveway access strategy to minimize turning conflicts and improve operational safety.
• Right-in/right-out configurations or driveway consolidation should be considered to support corridor flow and multimodal safety, particularly with the future installation of Class IV bikeways.

Turn Lane Storage and Queuing
The queuing analysis includes turn pocket storage recommendations; however:
• Please confirm that left- and right-turn pockets near ramp terminals meet the Highway Design Manual (HDM) and Caltrans Design Manual criteria for 2046 cumulative volumes, including appropriate deceleration and taper lengths. 510
Section 10, Item E
Mr. Matthew Arndt – NWC C-Store & Fuel
June 20, 2025

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Future planned bikeways (Class I and IV) along Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street, along with existing pedestrian infrastructure, will introduce significant multimodal interaction at project driveways and intersections.
• Project access and intersection improvements must be designed to reduce conflict potential with non-motorized users.
• If roundabouts are selected, bikeway continuity and visibility through the intersection must be addressed per Caltrans' roundabout design guidance.

Conclusion
Due to the projected operational and safety deficiencies at the SR 99 ramp intersections, and based on Caltrans’ determination that roundabouts are the only feasible long-term improvement strategy, Caltrans recommends that the following conditions be incorporated into the City’s project approval:
• Initiation and preparation of an ISOAP by the lead agency, in coordination with Caltrans, for the SR 99 ramp intersections
• Submittal of conceptual improvement layouts
• Coordination with Caltrans on geometric and multimodal design elements These conditions are necessary to ensure the project’s consistency with long-term safety, operational, and multimodal goals for the State Highway System.

In addition, Caltrans recommends that the applicant’s fair share contribution toward future roundabout implementation be included as a condition of approval and secured through a binding mechanism such as a development agreement, capital improvement program, or fee program administered by the lead agency in coordination with Caltrans.

If you have any other questions, please call Elizabeth Yelton, Transportation Planner at (559) 365-5140.

Sincerely,
Mr. DAVE PADILLA, Branch Chief,
Local Development Branch
511
Section 10, Item E

EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
LOT 45 OF TRACT MAP NO. 5042, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72,

FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

CONTAINING 42,605 SQ. FT. GROSS (0.98 ACRES) MORE OR LESS LOT 46 OF TRACT MAP NO. 5042, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72,

FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

CONTAINING 11,809 SQ. FT. GROSS (0.27 ACRES) MORE OR LESS __________________________ DEC. 4, 2024
PEDRO J. PEDROZA, PLS 5494 DATE
APN’S 343-350-45 & 46
512
Section 10, Item E Attachment 10: Lot Line Adjustment Exhibits

Page 3 ends

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. _______
BEING A MERGER OF LOTS 45 AND 46 OF TRACT MAP NO. 5042, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL A:

LOTS 45 AND 46 OF TRACT MAP NO. 5042, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72,

FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

CONTAINING 54,414 SQ. FT. GROSS (1.249 ACRES) MORE OR LESS __________________________ DEC. 4, 2024
PEDRO J. PEDROZA, PLS 5494 DATE
APN’S 343-350-45 & 46
513
Section 10, Item E
THIS MAP IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY PAGE 4 OF 8
PEDRO J. PEDROZA, PLS 5494
DATE
APN’S: 343-350-45 & 46
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. EXHIBIT BBEING A MERGER OF LOTS 45 AND 46 IN TRACT MAP NO. 5042 IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, FILED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, ALSO BEING LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

OWNER INFORMATION
MICHAEL ARFSLEN RETAIL CALIFORNIA 7480 NORTH PALM AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93711 LAND SURVEYOR:PEDRO J. PEDROZA, PLS NO. 5494 425 19TH STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 [email protected]:

SITE ADDRESS: 418 WEST FOWLER AVENUE, FOWLER, CA 93625 EXISTING USE: VACANT PROPOSED USE: GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERICALZONING: C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERICAL WATER: CITY OF FOWLER SEWER: SELMA-KINGSBURG-FOWLER COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ELECTRICITY: PG&E GAS: PG&E 1TELEPHONE: AT&T CABLE: SPECTRUM APN: 343-350-45 & 46 PROJECT AREA:

APN: 343-350-45: 42,605 SQ. FT. GROSS & 33,384 SQ. FT. NET APN: 343-350-46: 11,809 SQ. FT. GROSS & 9,905 SQ. FT. NET FLOOD ZONE: NONE BASIS OF BEARINGS: ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN UPON THIS MAPPING ARE RECORD AND CALCULATED FROM TRACT MAP NO. 5042, RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002 IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 AND 72, F.C.R. EASEMENTS FROM TITLE REPORT: SEE PAGE 5 FOWLER, CA

VICINITY MAP

NO SCALE
N
NORTH
514
Section 10, Item E
THIS MAP IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY PAGE 5 OF 8
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. EXHIBIT BBEING A MERGER OF LOTS 45 AND 46 IN TRACT MAP NO. 5042 IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF, FILED OCTOBER 15, 2002, IN VOLUME 66 OF PLATS, AT PAGES 71 AND 72, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, ALSO BEING LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T. 15 S., R. 21 E., M.D.M., IN THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

EXCEPTIONS AND EASEMENTS FROM TITLE REPORT:
5 IRRIGATION DITCH IN FAVOR OF W.L. GRIFFEN PER BOOK 284, PAGE 212 OF DEEDS. (THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORDED).
6 IRRIGATION DITCH RIGHTS PER LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN A.F. COFFEY, CHARLES ALDEN, AND PETER MATHSON RECORDED ON APRIL 8, 1913 IN BOOK 74, PAGE 375 OF COVENANTS (THE EXACT LOCATION OF EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD).
9 PUBLIC UTILITIES & STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS AS SHOWN AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS DELINEATED OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION , ON TRACT MAP NO. 5042.
(NOT IN TITLE REPORT) A 20.5’ WIDE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 5042. 515
Section 10, Item E
516
Section 10, Item E
517
Section 10, Item E
518
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
1 / 54
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.9. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
519
Section 10, Item E Attachment 11: CalEEMod Output Files CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
2 / 54

3.11. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 520
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
3 / 54

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 521
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
4 / 54

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated 522
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
5 / 54

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 523
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
6 / 54

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
524
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
7 / 54

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name CUP 24-27
Construction Start Date 9/1/2025
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.70
Precipitation (days) 25.4
Location 36.62467210879598, -119.68355645924595
County Fresno
City Fowler
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2536
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
525
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
8 / 54
Convenience 6.00 Pump 0.02 847 0.00 — — —
Market with Gas
Pumps
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

4.54 1000sqft 0.10 4,545 0.00 — — —
Free-Standing
Discount store

1.50 1000sqft 0.03 1,500 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 0.83 Acre 0.83 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

5.20 1000sqft 0.12 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.49 4.47 14.1 14.9 0.02 0.64 2.82 3.46 0.59 1.35 1.94 — 2,515 2,515 0.10 0.02 0.23 2,525 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.49 4.47 8.98 10.1 0.02 0.33 0.07 0.35 0.30 0.02 0.31 — 1,830 1,830 0.07 0.02 0.01 1,837 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.32 0.28 2.24 2.50 < 0.005 0.08 0.06 0.14 0.08 0.03 0.10 — 450 450 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 451 526
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
9 / 54
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
(Max)
Unmit. 0.06 0.05 0.41 0.46 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 — 74.5 74.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 74.7

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 1.84 1.55 14.1 14.9 0.02 0.64 2.82 3.46 0.59 1.35 1.94 — 2,515 2,515 0.10 0.02 0.23 2,525 2026 4.49 4.47 0.86 1.15 < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 137 137 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 137 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 1.29 1.08 8.98 10.1 0.02 0.33 0.02 0.35 0.30 < 0.005 0.31 — 1,830 1,830 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 1,837 2026 4.49 4.47 8.60 10.0 0.02 0.29 0.07 0.31 0.27 0.02 0.27 — 1,830 1,830 0.07 0.02 0.01 1,837 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.32 0.27 2.24 2.50 < 0.005 0.08 0.06 0.14 0.08 0.03 0.10 — 450 450 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 451 2026 0.31 0.28 1.31 1.57 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 — 280 280 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 281 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.06 0.05 0.41 0.46 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 — 74.5 74.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 74.7 2026 0.06 0.05 0.24 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 46.3 46.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 46.5

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
527
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
10 / 54
Unmit. 20.5 19.1 17.8 153 0.37 0.30 30.2 30.5 0.28 7.67 7.95 36.0 38,014 38,050 5.07 1.78 312 39,017 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 18.5 17.0 20.4 129 0.34 0.30 30.2 30.5 0.28 7.67 7.95 36.0 34,864 34,900 5.28 1.90 186 35,785 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.5 13.7 10.6 72.0 0.16 0.14 12.9 13.0 0.14 3.27 3.41 36.0 16,144 16,180 4.66 0.97 207 16,792 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.64 2.49 1.94 13.1 0.03 0.03 2.35 2.38 0.02 0.60 0.62 5.97 2,673 2,679 0.77 0.16 34.2 2,780

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 20.3 18.9 17.7 152 0.37 0.28 30.2 30.5 0.27 7.67 7.93 — 37,646 37,646 1.42 1.76 129 38,336 Area 0.22 0.21 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.23 1.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.24 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 364 364 0.04 < 0.005 — 366 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 3.42 6.40 0.31 0.01 — 16.2 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 33.1 0.00 33.1 3.30 0.00 — 116 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 183 183
Total 20.5 19.1 17.8 153 0.37 0.30 30.2 30.5 0.28 7.67 7.95 36.0 38,014 38,050 5.07 1.78 312 39,017 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 18.3 16.8 20.2 129 0.34 0.28 30.2 30.5 0.27 7.67 7.93 — 34,497 34,497 1.62 1.89 3.34 35,104 Area 0.16 0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —528
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
11 / 54
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 364 364 0.04 < 0.005 — 366 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 3.42 6.40 0.31 0.01 — 16.2 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 33.1 0.00 33.1 3.30 0.00 — 116 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 183 183
Total 18.5 17.0 20.4 129 0.34 0.30 30.2 30.5 0.28 7.67 7.95 36.0 34,864 34,900 5.28 1.90 186 35,785 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 14.2 13.5 10.4 71.7 0.15 0.13 12.9 13.0 0.12 3.27 3.39 — 15,777 15,777 1.00 0.96 24.1 16,111 Area 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.61 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 364 364 0.04 < 0.005 — 366 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 3.42 6.40 0.31 0.01 — 16.2 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 33.1 0.00 33.1 3.30 0.00 — 116 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 183 183
Total 14.5 13.7 10.6 72.0 0.16 0.14 12.9 13.0 0.14 3.27 3.41 36.0 16,144 16,180 4.66 0.97 207 16,792 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.60 2.46 1.91 13.1 0.03 0.02 2.35 2.38 0.02 0.60 0.62 — 2,612 2,612 0.17 0.16 3.99 2,667 Area 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.10 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 60.2 60.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 60.6 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.57 1.06 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.69 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 5.47 0.00 5.47 0.55 0.00 — 19.2 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.2 30.2
Total 2.64 2.49 1.94 13.1 0.03 0.03 2.35 2.38 0.02 0.60 0.62 5.97 2,673 2,679 0.77 0.16 34.2 2,780

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 529
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
12 / 54
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.56 1.31 12.1 12.1 0.02 0.56 — 0.56 0.52 — 0.52 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.44 2.44 — 1.17 1.17 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 17.0 17.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.82 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — 530
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
13 / 54
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 45.5 45.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 46.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.34 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
531
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
14 / 54
Off-Roa 1.80 1.51 14.1 14.5 0.02 0.64 — 0.64 0.59 — 0.59 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.76 2.76 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.02 0.02 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.9 26.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.45 4.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.47 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —532
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
15 / 54
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 60.6 60.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 61.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 533
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
16 / 54
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.28 0.24 1.98 2.22 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 398 398 0.02 < 0.005 — 400 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.05 0.04 0.36 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 65.9 65.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 66.2 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 16.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 14.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 15.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.3 14.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.5 534
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
17 / 54
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 14.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.28 3.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.33 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.29 3.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.44 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.57 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.22 1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
535
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
18 / 54
Off-Roa 0.16 0.14 1.16 1.34 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 243 243 0.01 < 0.005 — 244 d
Equipm
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.03 0.21 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 40.3 40.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.4 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.6 14.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.99 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.97 1.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.33 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 536
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
19 / 54

3.9. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.56 0.47 4.41 6.48 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 991 991 0.04 0.01 — 995 Paving 0.22 0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02 0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.3 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.50 4.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.51 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 537
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
20 / 54
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 65.9 65.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.87 1.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 538
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
21 / 54
Architect 4.35 4.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.35 4.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.66 3.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.67 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.12 0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.61 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.02 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
539
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
22 / 54
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.16 3.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.21 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.80 2.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 540
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
23 / 54
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps

8.14 7.57 7.11 61.4 0.15 0.11 12.2 12.3 0.11 3.09 3.20 — 15,190 15,190 0.57 0.71 52.0 15,468 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru

11.8 11.0 10.3 88.9 0.22 0.16 17.7 17.8 0.16 4.48 4.63 — 21,982 21,982 0.82 1.03 75.3 22,385 Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store

0.40 0.38 0.26 2.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 0.38 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 — 473 473 0.02 0.03 1.59 483 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 20.3 18.9 17.7 152 0.37 0.28 30.2 30.5 0.27 7.67 7.93 — 37,646 37,646 1.42 1.76 129 38,336 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps

7.33 6.74 8.13 52.0 0.14 0.11 12.2 12.3 0.11 3.09 3.20 — 13,919 13,919 0.65 0.76 1.35 14,164 541
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
24 / 54
Fast 10.6 9.75 11.8 75.2 0.20 0.16 17.7 17.8 0.16 4.48 4.63 — 20,143 20,143 0.94 1.10 1.95 20,497 Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store

0.36 0.33 0.30 1.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 0.38 < 0.005 0.09 0.10 — 435 435 0.03 0.03 0.04 444 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 18.3 16.8 20.2 129 0.34 0.28 30.2 30.5 0.27 7.67 7.93 — 34,497 34,497 1.62 1.89 3.34 35,104 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps

1.16 1.10 0.80 5.52 0.01 0.01 0.93 0.94 0.01 0.24 0.25 — 1,046 1,046 0.07 0.07 1.59 1,069 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru

1.38 1.30 1.06 7.29 0.02 0.01 1.36 1.38 0.01 0.35 0.36 — 1,504 1,504 0.09 0.09 2.31 1,535 Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store

0.05 0.05 0.04 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 61.7 61.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 62.9 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.60 2.46 1.91 13.1 0.03 0.02 2.35 2.38 0.02 0.60 0.62 — 2,612 2,612 0.17 0.16 3.99 2,667 542 Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
25 / 54

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
— — — — — — — — — — — — 27.8 27.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.0 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 113 113 0.02 < 0.005 — 115
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8.85 8.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.94 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 17.7 17.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.9 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 168 168 0.03 < 0.005 — 169 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
543
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
26 / 54
Conveni———————————— 27.8 27.8 < 0.005 < 0.005— 28.0
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
———————————— 113 113 0.02 < 0.005— 115
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
———————————— 8.85 8.85 < 0.005 < 0.005— 8.94
Parking
Lot
———————————— 17.7 17.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 17.9
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total———————————— 168 168 0.03 < 0.005— 169
Annual——————————————————
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
———————————— 4.60 4.60 < 0.005 < 0.005— 4.64
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
———————————— 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005— 19.0
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
———————————— 1.47 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005— 1.48
Parking
Lot
———————————— 2.93 2.93 < 0.005 < 0.005— 2.96
544
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
27 / 54
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 27.8 27.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.1

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.06 9.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.08 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 182 182 0.02 < 0.005 — 183 Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.71 4.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.72 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 196 196 0.02 < 0.005 — 196 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
545
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
28 / 54
Conveni
Market
with Gas
Pumps
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.06 9.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.08 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 196 196 0.02 < 0.005 — 196 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.50 1.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.50 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.2 30.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.78 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.78 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 546
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
29 / 54
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.4 32.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.5

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.15 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.23 1.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.24 Total 0.22 0.21 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.23 1.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.24 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.15 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
547
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
30 / 54
Architect 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Coating
s
Total 0.16 0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s

0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s
< 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.10 Total 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.10

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.14 0.26 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.66 548
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
31 / 54
Fast——————————— 2.64 3.04 5.68 0.27 0.01— 14.4
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thr
u
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
——————————— 0.21 0.24 0.46 0.02 < 0.005— 1.16
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 2.98 3.42 6.40 0.31 0.01— 16.2
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
——————————— 0.12 0.14 0.26 0.01 < 0.005— 0.66
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
——————————— 2.64 3.04 5.68 0.27 0.01— 14.4
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
——————————— 0.21 0.24 0.46 0.02 < 0.005— 1.16
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
549
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
32 / 54
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 3.42 6.40 0.31 0.01 — 16.2 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.11 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.44 0.50 0.94 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.39 Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.19 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.57 1.06 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.69

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
550
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
33 / 54
Conveni——————————— 1.37 0.00 1.37 0.14 0.00— 4.79
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
——————————— 28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00— 98.7
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
——————————— 3.48 0.00 3.48 0.35 0.00— 12.2
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 33.1 0.00 33.1 3.30 0.00— 116
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
——————————— 1.37 0.00 1.37 0.14 0.00— 4.79
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
——————————— 28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00— 98.7
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
——————————— 3.48 0.00 3.48 0.35 0.00— 12.2
551
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
34 / 54
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 33.1 0.00 33.1 3.30 0.00 — 116 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.00 — 0.79
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.67 0.00 4.67 0.47 0.00 — 16.3
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 — 2.01
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 5.47 0.00 5.47 0.55 0.00 — 19.2

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 552
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
35 / 54
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
———————————————— 176 176
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
———————————————— 7.10 7.10
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
———————————————— 0.01 0.01
Total———————————————— 183 183
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Conveni
ence
Market
with Gas
Pumps
———————————————— 176 176
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
———————————————— 7.10 7.10
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
———————————————— 0.01 0.01
Total———————————————— 183 183
Annual——————————————————553
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
36 / 54
Conveni
Market
with Gas
Pumps
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 29.1 29.1
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.18 1.18
Free-Sta
nding
Discount
store
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.2 30.2

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
554
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
37 / 54

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
555
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
38 / 54
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —556
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
39 / 54
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —557
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
40 / 54
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/1/2025 9/3/2025 5.00 3.00 — Grading Grading 9/4/2025 9/9/2025 5.00 4.00 —
Building Construction Building Construction 9/10/2025 3/10/2026 5.00 130 — Paving Paving 3/11/2026 3/24/2026 5.00 10.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/25/2026 4/7/2026 5.00 10.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 558
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
41 / 54
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 7.50 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 10.0 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT 559
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
42 / 54
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 2.66 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 1.13 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 12.5 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 0.53 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 10,338 3,446 2,481

5.6. Dust Mitigation
560
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
43 / 54

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 2.81 0.00 —
Grading — — 4.00 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Free-Standing Discount store 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.83 100%
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.12 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
561
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
44 / 54

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
1,935 1,935 1,935 706,275 3,404 17,253 17,253 2,686,839 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
2,140 2,800 2,148 816,061 6,191 24,968 19,151 3,914,582 Free-Standing
Discount store

79.7 106 90.3 31,017 423 527 448 161,141
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 10,338 3,446 2,481

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
562
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
45 / 54

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps
49,684 204 0.0330 0.0040 28,255
Fast Food Restaurant with
Drive Thru
203,085 204 0.0330 0.0040 568,278
Free-Standing Discount store 15,840 204 0.0330 0.0040 14,689 Parking Lot 31,672 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 62,743 0.00
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,379,561 0.00
Free-Standing Discount store 111,109 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 2.54 —
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 52.4 —
563
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
46 / 54
Free-Standing Discount store 6.45 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Convenience Market
with Gas Pumps
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Convenience Market
with Gas Pumps
Supermarket
refrigeration and
condensing units
R-404A 3,922 26.5 16.5 16.5 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Free-Standing
Discount store
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Free-Standing
Discount store
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 564
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
47 / 54

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) 565
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
48 / 54

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 29.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 1.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 0 0 0 N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A 566
Section , Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
49 / 54
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 1 1 1 2
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6 567
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
50 / 54
AQ-PM 94.9
AQ-DPM 65.0
Drinking Water 96.4
Lead Risk Housing 55.5
Pesticides 93.5
Toxic Releases 62.1
Traffic 35.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 50.3
Groundwater 61.5
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 27.1
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 98.1
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 88.8
Cardio-vascular 65.6
Low Birth Weights 73.8
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 79.3
Housing 13.1
Linguistic 63.0
Poverty 66.4
Unemployment 71.7

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic — 568
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
51 / 54
Above Poverty 27.9481586
Employed 28.26895932
Median HI 33.88938791
Education—
Bachelor's or higher 21.73745669
High school enrollment 23.59810086
Preschool enrollment 32.91415373
Transportation—
Auto Access 81.29090209
Active commuting 8.956756063
Social—
2-parent households 54.69010651
Voting 36.35313743
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 76.64570769
Park access 6.865135378
Retail density 6.916463493
Supermarket access 37.66200436
Tree canopy 4.504042089
Housing—
Homeownership 49.74977544
Housing habitability 37.64917233
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 52.76530219 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 58.00076992
Uncrowded housing 21.40382394
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 26.25433081
Arthritis 0.0
569
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
52 / 54
Asthma ER Admissions 14.8
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 13.6
Cognitively Disabled 36.6
Physically Disabled 60.6
Heart Attack ER Admissions 19.1
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 93.2
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 13.5
Elderly 45.2
English Speaking 30.1
Foreign-born 55.0
570
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
53 / 54
Outdoor Workers 2.8
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 92.1
Traffic Density 38.2
Traffic Access 0.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 81.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 22.7

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 93.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 25.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data 571
Section 10, Item E
CUP 24-27 Detailed Report, 12/17/2024
54 / 54
Screen Justification
Characteristics: Project Details Construction timeline inserted Construction: Construction Phases No demolition, based on given construction timeline. 572
Section 10, Item E
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS
FOWLER AVENUE & FRESNO STREET CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION FOWLER, CALIFORNIA
WJVA Project No. 24-69
PREPARED FOR
ARCHER ENGINEERING
15927 CUSANO PLACE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93314
PREPARED BY
WJV ACOUSTICS, INC.

VISALIA, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 23, 2024
113 N. Church Street, Suite 203 ∙ Visalia, CA 93291∙ (559) 627-4923 573 Section 10, Item E
Attachment 12: Acoustical Analysis
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 2

INTRODUCTION
The project is a proposed gas station and convenience store, to be located at W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue, in the City of Fowler, California. The gas station would operate 24 hours per day, seven days a week. The convenience store would operate between 5:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., daily. The convenience store would offer a variety of products, including snacks, beverages, tobacco products, automotive supplies, and basic groceries. The convenience store would include a drive‐thru window allowing customers to order and receive food orders while remaining in their vehicles. The drive‐thru operations would occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The convenience store will have 2‐3 employees on shift during operational hours.

This analysis, prepared by WJV Acoustics, Inc. (WJVA), is based upon a project site plan prepared by Archer Engineering, the findings of on‐site ambient noise level measurements, project‐related operational information provided by the applicant, and WJVA file noise data. Revisions to the site plan and/or project operational information may affect the findings and recommendations of this report. The project site plan is provided as Figure 1.

Appendix A provides a description of the acoustical terminology used in this report. Unless otherwise stated, all sound levels reported are in A‐weighted decibels (dB). A‐weighting de‐emphasizes the very low and very high frequencies of sound in a manner similar to the human ear. Most community noise standards utilize A‐weighting, as it provides a high degree of correlation with human annoyance and health effects. Appendix B provides typical A‐weighted sound levels for common noise sources.
574
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 3

NOISE EXPOSURE CRITERIA
Geneal Plan‐
The City of Fowler uses the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan (adopted April 18, 2023) provides noise level criteria for land use compatibility for transportation noise sources. The General Plan sets noise compatibility standards for transportation noise sources in terms of the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The CNEL represent the time‐weighted energy average noise level for a 24‐hour day, with a 10 dB penalty added to noise levels occurring during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m.‐7:00 a.m. and a penalty of 5 dB (technically 4.77 dB) that is added to noise levels occurring during the evening hours between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. The CNEL represents cumulative exposure to noise over an extended period of time and is therefore calculated based upon annual average conditions. Table I provides the General Plan noise level standards for transportation noise sources.

TABLE I

CITY OF FOWLER GENERAL PLAN NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS

TRANSPORTATION (NON-AIRCRAFT) NOISE SOURCES
Noise‐Sensitive Land Use
Outdoor Activity Areas1 Interior Occupied Spaces (dBA)
CNEL, dBA1 CNEL, dB Leq6
Residential 652,3 454 ‐‐‐
Convalescent Care Facilities, Hospitals 702,3 454 ‐‐‐
Transient Lodging 652,3 45 ‐‐‐
Schools, Libraries, Museums, Places of Worship ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 45 Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks 705 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Office Buildings 703 ‐‐‐ 45
Commercial Retail & Light Industrial 75 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 1. To be applied at outdoor activity areas. Where the location of outdoor activity areas is unknown, the exterior noise level standard shall be applied at the property line of the receiving land use.

2. Where it is not possible to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 dBA CNEL, or less, an exterior noise level of 70 dBA CNEL may be allowed provided that an acoustical analysis has been prepared for the project to identify available exterior noise‐reduction measures to be incorporated and interior noise levels are in compliance with this table.

3. Where outdoor activity areas are not included in the project design, only the interior noise level standard shall apply.

4. In locations where railroad noise is the predominant noise source, the interior noise standard for residential land uses shall be reduced by 5 dB to account for the increased potential for sleep disruption to building occupants.

5. Where quiet is a basis for use.

6. This standard is intended to apply to land uses with operational hours predominantly during the daytime hours. The interior noise standard applies to a typical worst‐case hour during the period of use.

Source: City of Fowler General Plan
The exterior noise level standards for residential land uses provided in Table I apply at the outdoor activity areas. Outdoor activity areas are generally considered backyards and balconies of single‐family residential uses and individual yards, patios, balconies, and common use outdoor areas of multi‐family residential uses. Common use outdoor activities include pools, children’s play areas, and picnic and BBQ areas.
575
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 4 Municipal Code‐
Article 14, Section 9‐15.1417 of the City of Fowler Municipal Code provides the non‐ transportation (stationary) noise source standards applicable to the project. The performance standards for non‐transportation noise sources are summarized below in Table II. The standards become 5‐10 dB more restrictive during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. As the project site is located adjacent to residential land uses, the noise standards provided below in Table II for residential land uses are applicable to the project.

It should be noted, standard practice and convention state that when existing measured ambient noise levels already exceed the noise levels established as applicable noise standards, the measured ambient noise levels become the applicable noise standards. In such situations the project cannot result in an increase over existing ambient noise levels at the location of a sensitive receptor property line.

TABLE II

CITY OF FOWLER MUNICIPAL CODE PERFORMANCE NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS

NON-TRANSPORTATION (STATIONARY) NOISE SOURCES
Receiving Lnad Use Category Time Period Noise Level (dBA)1 Residential 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 50
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 60
Public Use2 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 55
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 60
Commercial 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 60
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 65
Industrial Anytime 70 1
Applied at the property line of the receiving land use.

The noise standard of a cumulative 30‐minute period during any hour A 10 dB increase of the noise standard for a cumulative of 5, or more, minutes during any hour A 20 dB increase of the noise standard, or exceed maximum ambient noise level during any time period 2 Includes schools, libraries, hospitals, churches, and parks.

Noise standards do not apply to railroad operations, motor vehicles, including trucks, or to agricultural equipment used in the cultivation of any agricultural land in the M‐I Zone. Noise standards are subject to review/amendment by the City Source: City of Fowler Municipal Code
576
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 5

EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The project site is located at the northwest corner of W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue, in the City of Fowler, California. The project site is generally bordered by residential land uses to the west, commercial/retail land uses to the north, S Fowler Avenue and State Route 99 (SR 99) to the east, and undeveloped land to the south. The project site is exposed to traffic noise associated with SR 99, and to a lesser extent, S. Flower Avenue and W. Fresno Street.

WJVA staff conducted ambient noise level measurements in the vicinity of the project site on December 18, 2024. Long‐term (24‐hour) ambient noise level measurements were conducted at one (1) location (site LT‐1). Ambient noise levels were measured for a period of 24 continuous hours at the long‐term ambient noise measurement location. Site LT‐1 was located along the existing sound wall along the project site property line with adjacent residential land uses to the west. The location was selected as to document existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the closest existing sensitive receptors (residential land uses) to the project site. The location of the long‐term ambient noise measurement site is provided as Figure 2. Photographs of the long‐ term ambient noise measurement site is provided as Figure 3.

Noise monitoring equipment consisted of a Larson‐Davis Laboratories Model LDL‐820 sound level analyzer equipped with a B&K Type 4176 1/2” microphone. The equipment complies with the specifications of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Type I (Precision) sound level meters. The meter was calibrated with a B&K Type 4230 acoustic calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements.

Measured hourly energy average noise levels (Leq) at site LT‐1 ranged from a low of 63.2 dB between 2:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. to a high of 71.2 dBA between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. Hourly maximum (Lmax) noise levels at site LT‐1 ranged from 72.5 to 86.5 dBA. Residual noise levels at the monitoring site, as defined by the L90, ranged from 57.6 to 69.2 dBA. The L90 is a statistical descriptor that defines the noise level exceeded 90% of the time during each hour of the sample period. The L90 is generally considered to represent the residual (or background) noise level in the absence of identifiable single noise events from traffic, aircraft, and other local noise sources.

The measured CNEL value at site LT‐1 was 74.2 dB CNEL.

Figure 4 graphically depicts hourly variations in ambient noise levels at site LT‐1 for the 24‐hour measurement period. Table III provides the measured 24‐hour noise levels in terms of the applicable City of Fowler noise ordinance (municipal code) standards (L50, L8, and Lmax). 577
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 6

TABLE III
SUMMARY OF 24-HOUR NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS, LT-1

FOWLER & FRESNO CONVENIENCE STORE & GAS STATION
DECEMBER 18, 2024
Time
A‐Weighted Decibels, dB, Leq (one‐hour average)
LT‐1
L50 L8 Lmax
12:00 a.m. 63.6 67.4 77.1
1:00 a.m. 63.0 66.8 80.9
2:00 a.m. 62.3 66.6 72.5
3:00 a.m. 64.1 67.8 72.9
4:00 a.m. 66.4 69.6 75.5
5:00 a.m. 69.3 71.8 77.9
6:00 a.m. 70.9 72.8 78.8
7:00 a.m. 71.0 72.7 84.3
8:00 a.m. 70.3 72.1 75.5
9:00 a.m. 69.3 71.3 77.8
10:00 a.m. 70.0 72.0 83.5
11:00 a.m. 69.6 71.9 84.7
12:00 p.m. 69.8 71.8 81.3
1:00 p.m. 69.8 71.9 85.6
2:00 p.m. 70.0 71.9 78.7
3:00 p.m. 69.8 71.7 85.8
4:00 p.m. 70.1 71.8 80.8
5:00 p.m. 68.7 70.8 83.8
6:00 p.m. 69.5 71.6 84.3
7:00 p.m. 68.8 70.9 86.5
8:00 p.m. 68.1 70.4 80.1
9:00 p.m. 66.8 69.6 75.1
10:00 p.m. 65.6 68.7 74.4
11:00 p.m. 63.8 67.5 78.5
Average Daytime 69.5 71.6 83.1
Average Nighttime 66.5 69.3 77.3
Source: WJV Acoustics, Inc.
578
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 7

PROJECT-RELATED NOISE LEVELS
The project would include the operation of a gas station and convenience store, to be located at W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue, in the City of Fowler, California. The gas station would operate 24 hours per day, seven days a week. The convenience store would operate between 5:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., daily. The convenience store would include a drive‐thru window allowing customers to order and receive food orders while remaining in their vehicles. The drive‐ thru operations would include the same hours of operation as the convenience store.

It should be noted, the adjacent residential property line west of the project site includes an existing concrete/CMU block wall of approximately 8‐9 feet in height above project site elevation.

This existing wall would provide significant acoustic shielding/noise attenuation to the adjacent residential land uses.

A wide variety of noise sources can be associated with the proposed land uses (gas station and convenience store). The noise levels produced by such sources can also be highly variable and could potentially impact adjacent sensitive receptors (residential land uses west of the project site). Typical examples of stationary noise sources associated with such land uses include:
 HVAC/Mechanical equipment
 Truck deliveries
 Parking lot activities (closing of car doors and trunks, stereos, alarms etc.)  Drive Thru operations (amplified menuboard)
Mechanical Equipment
It is assumed that the project would include roof‐mounted HVAC units on the proposed building.

The heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) requirements for the buildings would likely require the use of multiple packaged roof‐top units. For the purpose of noise and aesthetics, roof‐mounted HVAC units are typically shielded by means of a roof parapet. WJVA has conducted reference noise level measurements at numerous commercial and retail buildings with roof‐ mounted HVAC units, and associated noise levels typically range between approximately 45‐50 dB at a distance of 50 feet from the building façade.

For this project, the closest residential property lines to any potential roof‐mounted HVAC equipment would be located at a minimum setback distance of 40 feet. Taking into account the standard rate of noise attenuation with increased distance from a point source (‐6 dB/doubling of distance), noise levels associated with the operation of roof‐mounted HVAC units would be approximately 47‐52 dB at the closest sensitive receptor property line. Such levels do not exceed any City of Fowler noise level standard or exceed existing (without project) ambient noise levels. 579
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 8 Truck Movements
At the time of this analysis, a specific truck access route was not known. However, it is assumed that the project would include periodic truck deliveries of fuel and retail products for the convenience store. Based upon the site plan layout, it is anticipated that truck movements would occur at distances of fifty (50) feet or greater from the residential property line.

WJVA has conducted measurements of the noise levels produced by slowly moving trucks for a number of studies. Such truck movements would be expected to produce noise levels in the range of 65 to 71 dBA at a distance of 100 feet. The range in measured truck noise levels is due to differences in the size of trucks, their speed of movement and whether they have refrigeration units in operation during the pass‐by.

Truck movements within the project site would likely occur at distances of 50 feet or greater from existing noise‐sensitive land uses (residences to the west). As such distances, noise levels associated with on‐site truck movements would produce maximum noise levels in the range of approximately 71 to 77 dB or less. Such noise levels would generally not be expected to exceed the City’s daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) noise level standard of 80 dB Lmax. It is not known if any truck deliveries would occur during the nighttime hours 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., however, average existing ambient noise levels during the nighttime hours were measured to be approximately 77 dB Lmax, the approximate maximum range of noise levels anticipated for on‐ site truck movements.

The above‐described noise levels do not take into account the noise attenuation that would be provided by the existing CMU block wall. WJVA calculated the anticipated noise level reduction that would be provided by the existing wall along the adjacent residential property line. A computer model based upon the FHWA Traffic Noise Model was used to determine the noise level reduction that would be provided by the existing wall. The model calculates sound wall insertion loss (noise reduction) based upon the distance from the source to the wall, the distance from wall to the receptor, and the relative heights of the sources and receptors. A semi‐truck is assumed to have an effective source height of 8 feet above the pavement and the assumed height of a residential receiver is 5 feet above the ground.

The existing sound wall is approximately 8‐9 feet in height. For the purpose of this analysis, an 8‐ foot wall assumed for the calculations. Based upon the above‐described assumptions and method of analysis, it was determined that the existing sound wall would reduce noise levels associated with on‐site truck movements by approximately 8 dB. As such, on‐site truck movements would not be expected to exceed any City of Fowler daytime or nighttime noise level standards and would not be expected to exceed existing ambient noise levels at the residential property line adjacent to the project site.

Parking Lot Activities/Vehicle Movements
Noise due to traffic in parking lots is typically limited by low speeds and is not usually considered to be significant. Human activity in parking lots that can produce noise includes voices, stereo systems and the opening and closing of car doors and trunk lids. Such activities can occur at any 580
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 9 time. The noise levels associated with these activities cannot be precisely defined due to variables such as the number of parking movements, time of day and other factors. It is typical for a passing car in a parking lot to produce a maximum noise level of 60 to 65 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, which is comparable to the level of a raised voice.

For this project, vehicle movements could occur as close as ten (10) feet from the adjacent residential property line. At such a distance, on‐site vehicle movements would be in the range of approximately 74‐79 dB.

Using the above‐described method of analysis, WJVA calculated the noise attenuation that would be provided by the existing CMU block wall. The existing block would reduce noise levels associated with on‐site vehicle movements by approximately 12 dB at the adjacent residential land uses. As such, noise levels associated with on‐site vehicle movements would not exceed any City of Fowler daytime or nighttime noise level standard, and would not exceed existing ambient noise levels measured at the residential property line, during both daytime and nighttime hours.

Additional Measurements at an Existing Convenience Store/Gas Station To further quantify noise levels that could be expected from typical gas station/convenience store operations, WJVA staff previously conducted reference noise measurements at an existing ARCO‐AM/PM facility (similar in size to the proposed project) located in Visalia, California. In order to obtain project‐related reference noise levels with minimal interference from roadway traffic noise levels, WJVA staff conducted the noise measurements between 3:45 a.m. and 5:00 a.m.

Noise measurements were conducted at distance of approximately 90 feet from the closest gas pump and 40 feet from the closest parking space. WJVA staff noted the number of vehicles entering the project site, and tallied them in 15‐minute intervals. The number of observed vehicles (patrons) were as follows:
 3:45‐4:00 a.m. : 13
 4:00‐4:15 a.m. : 12
 4:15‐4:30 a.m. : 10
 4:30‐4:45 a.m. : 17
 4:45‐5:00 a.m. : 14
Observed (and measured) sources of noise during the period of measurements were vehicle movements, vehicle starts (ignition), door/trunk closures, vehicle alarm sets and vehicle stereos.

As vehicles would enter the site and navigate to the pump or parking space of their choice, the distances between each activity and the noise monitor varied. In general, the vehicles tended to utilize the closest pumps to the gas station entrance, which corresponded to the closest spaces to the meter location.

Table IV provides the measured noise levels for each noise source type. Also provided in Table IV is the total number of events for each noise source, the average noise levels for all the events for 581
Section , Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 10 each noise source as well as the range of noise levels. During each “event” WJVA staff observed the noise meter and noted the maximum (Lmax) noise level for the event. It should be noted, for many of the vehicles/patrons, the noise sources described in Table IV were not audible or measurable over other existing off‐site noise sources, typically traffic noise associated with vehicles on the adjacent roadway.

TABLE IV

SUMMARY OF PROJECT-RELATED NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

ARCO-AM/PM, VISALIA, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 18, 2018
Noise Source Number of Measured
Events
Average, Lmax
A‐Weighted Decibels, dB
Vehicle Movements 20 54 (45‐72)
Vehicle Starts (Ignition) 14 54 (47‐71)
Door/Trunk Closure 16 49 (43‐57)
Vehicle Alarm Set 4 53 (43‐57)
Vehicle Stereo 2 59 (58‐60)
Source: WJV Acoustics, Inc.

The noise levels described in Table IV indicate that operational noise levels associated with the convenience store and gas station would not be expected to exceed any City of Fowler noise level standards and would be significantly lower than existing ambient noise levels measured at the residential property line adjacent to the project site.

Additionally, WJVA staff conducted continuous nighttime noise level measurements (between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.) at the Visalia ARCO‐AM/PM facility on the night of January 17, 2018. The noise meter was placed on a light post at a distance of approximately fifty (50) feet from the closest gas pump and adjacent to the closest parking space. The meter location was selected due to its proximity to the operations and provided a secure location for the monitoring equipment. This setback distance between the noise meter location and the gas station/convenience store is comparable to the distance between the proposed gas station/convenience store and the adjacent residential land uses.

Noise levels measured at the Visalia ARCO‐AM/PM are provided as Table V. The noise levels provided as “50’” represent those measured at the Noise Monitoring Site, which was located approximately 50 feet from the closest gas pump and adjacent to the closest parking space. The noise levels provided in Table V are provided in terms of the L50 statistical noise metric. The City of Fowler noise ordinance noise standards applicable to the project (provided above in Table II) are in terms of the L50 metric.

The noise levels measured at the Visalia ARCO‐AM/PM were heavily influenced by existing traffic noise associated with vehicles on the adjacent roadway. While it is unreasonable to assume that 582
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 11 the noise levels described in Table V (50’) were entirely attributable to on‐site (convenience store and gas station) sources, these noise levels are well below existing ambient noise levels measured at the adjacent residential property line, and therefore do not result in an exceedance of noise standards. Additionally, the noise levels described below in Table V do not take into account noise attenuation that would be provided by the existing CMU block wall along the adjacent residential property line, which would be expected to further reduce these noise levels by approximately 8‐ 12 dB at the adjacent residential land uses.

TABLE V

SUMMARY OF NIGHTTIME NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

VISALIA ARCO-AM/PM
JANUARY 17, 2018
Time
A‐Weighted Decibels, dB, L50
Leq
50’
8 pm 60
9 pm 59
10 pm 58
11 pm 53
12 pm 54
1 am 49
2 am 56
3 am 48
4 am 55
5 am 57
Average 56
Source: WJV Acoustics, Inc.

Drive Thru Retail
The project would include drive‐thru retail operations as part of the convenience store. Based upon the current site plan and details provided by the applicant, patrons would utilize the menuboard to order food products at the south side of the proposed building, drive around the travel lane at the west side of the project site/building and collect their order at the south side of the building. The menuboard would be located approximately 40 feet from the residential property line/CMU block wall adjacent to the project site.

In order to assess potential noise levels associated with drive‐thru operations, WJVA utilized reference noise levels measured at a Wendy’s drive‐thru restaurant located on South Mooney Boulevard in Visalia. Measurements were conducted during the early afternoon of July 11, 2011 between 12:45 p.m. and 1:45 p.m. using the previously‐described noise monitoring equipment.

The microphone used by customers to order food and the loudspeaker used by employees to confirm orders are both integrated into a menu board that is located a few feet from the drive‐ 583
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 12 thru lane at the approximate height of a typical car window. Vehicles would enter the drive‐thru lane from the west and then turn to the north along the east side of the restaurant.

Reference noise measurements were obtained at a distance of approximately 40 feet from the menu board containing the microphone/loudspeaker system at an angle of about 45° toward the rear of the vehicle being served. This provided a worst‐case exposure to sound from the loudspeaker system since the vehicle was not located directly between the loudspeaker and measurement location. Cars were lined up in the access lane during the noise measurement period indicating that the drive‐through lane was operating at or near a peak level of activity.

Each ordering cycle was observed to take approximately 60 seconds including vehicle movements. A typical ordering cycle included 5‐10 seconds of loudspeaker use with typical maximum noise levels in the range of 60‐62 dBA at the 40 foot‐reference location. Vehicles moving through the drive‐thru lane produced noise levels in the range of 55‐60 dBA at the same distance. Vehicles parked at the ordering position (between the menu board and measurement site) were observed to provide significant acoustic shielding during the ordering sequence. The effects of such shielding are reflected by the noise measurement data. Noise levels were measured to approximately 60 dB L50 at the measurement site, and included noise from all sources, including the loudspeaker, vehicle movements and HVAC equipment.

The closest noise‐sensitive receptors (residential property line) to the proposed retail drive‐thru operations (menu board location) are located approximately 40 feet to the west. As the measured noise levels described above were conducted at a setback distance of approximately 40 feet from the menuboard, the above‐described noise levels are considered representative of those which would be anticipated at the residential property line adjacent to the project site.

Drive‐thru operations would be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The applicable City of Fowler noise standard during these hours would be 60 dB L50. The above‐described reference noise levels indicate that noise levels associated with the amplified menuboard would be expected to be approximately 60 dB at the setback distance of the adjacent residential property line. However, these noise levels do not take into account existing elevated ambient noise levels ore the noise attenuation that would be provided by the existing CMU wall along the residential property line.

Using the above‐described method of analysis, WJVA calculated the amplified menuboard noise attenuation that would be provided by the existing CMU block wall at the adjacent residential property line. The existing block would reduce noise levels associated with the amplified menuboard by approximately 9 dB at the adjacent residential land uses. As such, noise levels associated with the amplified menuboard would be approximately 51 dB at the adjacent residential land uses, and would not exceed any City of Fowler noise level standards, and would not exceed existing ambient noise levels measured at the residential property line, during both daytime and nighttime hours.
584
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 13

CONCLUSIONS
 The existing noise environment is heavily impacted by existing elevated noise levels associated with traffic along SR 99. As such, existing ambient noise levels already exceed City of Fowler noise standards during every hour of the 24‐hour measurement period.  Sources of noise associated with the proposed project include mechanical/HVAC, truck and vehicle movements, parking lot activities (opening/closing of vehicle doors and trunks, etc.), and drive‐thru operations (amplified menuboard).  There is an existing 8‐9 foot CMU block wall along the project site property line adjacent to residential land uses. The block wall provides significant noise attenuation (reduction) of noise sources from the project site.
 Based upon the findings of this analysis, noise levels associated with the proposed project would not be expected to exceed any City of Fowler noise level standards/existing ambient noise levels at any nearby/adjacent residential land uses. Mitigation measures are therefore not required for project noise compliance.

The conclusions and recommendations of this acoustical analysis are based upon the best information known to WJV Acoustics Inc. (WJVA) at the time the analysis was prepared concerning the proposed site plan, project operational information, and proposed uses. Any significant changes in these factors will require a reevaluation of the findings of this report.

Additionally, any significant future changes in motor vehicle technology, noise regulations or other factors beyond WJVA’s control may result in long‐term noise results different from those described by this analysis.

Respectfully submitted,
Walter J. Van Groningen
President
WJV:wjv
585
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 14 FIGURE 1: SITE PLAN
586
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 FIGURE 2: PROJECT SITE VICINITY AND AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATION 587
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 FIGURE 3: NOISE MEASUREMENT SITE LT-1
588
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 FIGURE4: MEASURED 24-HOUR NOISE LEVELS AT AMBIENT SITE LT-1 405060708090
100
0:00:00
1:00:00
2:00:00
3:00:00
4:00:00
5:00:00
6:00:00
7:00:00
8:00:00
9:00:00
10:00:00
11:00:00
12:00:00
13:00:00
14:00:00
15:00:00
16:00:00
17:00:00
18:00:00
19:00:00
20:00:00
21:00:00
22:00:00
23:00:00
Levels, dBA
Time
Site LT‐1
December 18, 2024
LmaxL8L50
589
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24

APPENDIX A

ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL: The composite of noise from all sources near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level. The average equivalent sound level during a 24‐hour day, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m.

DECIBEL, dB: A unit for describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals (20 micronewtons per square meter).

DNL/Ldn: Day/Night Average Sound Level. The average equivalent sound level during a 24‐hour day, obtained after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00 p.m. and before 7:00 a.m.

Leq: EquivaClent Sound Level. The sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period.

Leq is typically computed over 1, 8 and 24‐hour sample periods.

NOTE: The CNEL and DNL represent daily levels of noise exposure averaged on an annual basis, while Leq represents the average noise exposure for a shorter time period, typically one hour.

Lmax: The maximum noise level recorded during a noise event.

Ln: The sound level exceeded "n" percent of the time during a sample interval (L90, L50, L10, etc.). For example, L10 equals the level exceeded 10 percent of the time.
590
Section 10, Item E
24‐69 (Fowler & Fresno Convenience Store & Gas Station) 12‐23‐24 A-2

ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY
NOISE EXPOSURE
CONTOURS: Lines drawn about a noise source indicating constant levels of noise exposure. CNEL and Ldn contours are frequently utilized to describe community exposure to noise.

NOISE LEVEL
REDUCTION (NLR): The noise reduction between indoor and outdoor environments or between two rooms that is the numerical difference, in decibels, of the average sound pressure levels in those areas or rooms. A measurement of “noise level reduction” combines the effect of the transmission loss performance of the structure plus the effect of acoustic absorption present in the receiving room.

SEL or SENEL: Sound Exposure Level or Single Event Noise Exposure Level. The level of noise accumulated during a single noise event, such as an aircraft overflight, with reference to a duration of one second.

More specifically, it is the time‐integrated A‐weighted squared sound pressure for a stated time interval or event, based on a reference pressure of 20 micropascals and a reference duration of one second.

SOUND LEVEL: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A‐weighting filter network. The A‐weighting filter de‐emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear and gives good correlation with subjective reactions to noise.

SOUND TRANSMISSION
CLASS (STC): The single‐number rating of sound transmission loss for a construction element (window, door, etc.) over a frequency range where speech intelligibility largely occurs.
591
Section 10, Item E
592
Section 10, Item E
RESOLUTION NO. 2816

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER, FINDING THAT PLANNING PROJECT NO. 24-27 IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR PLANNING PROJECT NO. 24- 27 TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CONVENIENCE STORE AND GAS STATION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF S. FOWLER AVENUE AND W.

FRESNO STREET.

WHEREAS, Paul Archer of Archer Engineering, on behalf of Baleegh Muharram and Dawood Hotar (“Applicant”), has proposed Planning Project No. 24-27 (“Project”), which includes a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) and a Lot Line Adjustment (“LLA”); and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes to construct an approximately 6,045 square foot (“sqft”) commercial development, that includes an approximately 4,545 sqft convenience store with quick serve restaurant (“QSR”), an approximately 1,500 sqft commercial tenant space, a fueling area with six (6) double sided fuel pumps, and an approximately 2,592 sqft fuel canopy on Assessor Parcel Numbers (“APNs”) 343-350-45 & -46 (“Project site”); and WHEREAS, APN 343-350-45 is approximately 0.27 acres in size and APN 343-250-46 is approximately 0.84 acres in size, and the Project site is generally located at the northwest corner of S. Fowler Avenue and W. Fresno Street; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is planned for Neighborhood Commercial land uses and is zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial); and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a convenience store, alcohol sales (Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine), tobacco sales, and operation of a drive through in conjunction with the proposed QSR within the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone district; and WHEREAS, approval of alcohol sales and the operation of a drive through requires approval of a CUP; and
WHEREAS, the Project also proposes the sale of tobacco within the proposed convenience store; and
WHEREAS, the operator of the convenience store is required to apply and be approved for a tobacco retailer license with the City Manager pursuant to Fowler Municipal Code section 5-

20.01, et. seq.; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes to construct a structure over parcel lines (fuel canopy), requiring that the underlying parcels be merged; and
593
Section 10, Item E
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for an LLA that would merge the two (2) underlying APNs into one (1) parcel of approximately 1.11 acres in size; and WHEREAS, the proposed LLA would conform with the City’s General Plan, and would not result in a greater number of parcels than originally existed; and WHEREAS, issuance of an alcohol license would contribute to the oversaturation of “OffSale” (Type 20 and Type 21) alcohol licenses within the Project site’s census tract; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to consider and make findings that issuance of an additional Type 20 alcohol license is a public convenience or necessity; and WHEREAS, the Project was considered by the Fowler Planning Commission at a regular meeting of the Commission on November 6, 2025, and where the Commission voted to deny the Applicant’s request based on concerns related to traffic and safety; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has filed a timely appeal of the Commission’s decision to the City Council pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.30.090, challenging the Commission’s basis for denial; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.30.090, subsection (F), appeals shall be considered a de novo (new) hearing, and the City Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report and is absolved of further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15183; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the November 21, 2025, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on December 2, 2025, at 6:00pm, the Fowler City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, CEQA findings, the applicant’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s regular meeting on December 2, 2025, including oral and written public testimony on the Project (“Administrative Record”), which is incorporated by this reference herein.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler:

1. Finds that the Project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report and is therefore exempt from any 594
Section 10, Item E
further environmental review under CEQA in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15183.

2. Hereby makes the following findings pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section

9.35.070 for approval of a CUP:
a. That the proposed design and location of the conditional use is consistent with the adopted General Plan and any applicable specific plan. b. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required by the Zoning Ordinance. c. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use, consistent with the mobility goals of the City.
d. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof.
e. That the conditions stated in the resolution are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.

3. The City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of the CUP without the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit “A” attached herein to this Resolution.

4. The City Council hereby approves the CUP applied for under Planning Project No. 24-27, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.

5. The City Council hereby approves the LLA applied for under Planning Project No. 24-27, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit “A”.

6. Based on the record of proceedings for this matter, including the staff report and presentations provided at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following findings pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.205.040 for approval of an off-sale liquor license resulting in an oversaturation of such license types in the underlying census tract, finding that the approval is necessary as a matter of public convenience or necessity in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 23817.7:
a. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Fowler Zoning Ordinance.
595
Section 10, Item E
b. The proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and character of adjacent land uses.
c. The proposed use would not have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses. d. The proposed use would not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity.
e. The proposed use will be essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare and will not impair the integrity and character of the zone district or be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. f. Notice of hearing, if applicable, shall be given to all owners of property in the same manner as required by the related permit.

7. The City Council hereby finds that the issuance of a Type 20 alcohol license for the Project is a public convenience or necessity, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit “A”.

8. The bases for these findings are detailed in the December 2, 2025, staff report, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing which are hereby incorporated by reference.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December 2025, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Fowler by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
596
Section 10, Item E
EXHIBIT “A”

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING PROJECT NO. 24-27
General Conditions

1. All conditions of approval shall be the sole financial responsibility of the Applicant/owner, except where specified in the conditions of approval listed herein or mandated by statutes.

2. The Applicant shall submit to the City of Fowler Community & Economic Development Department a check in the amount necessary to file a Notice of Determination at the Fresno County Clerk. This amount shall equal the Fresno County filing fee in effect at the time of filing. Such check shall be made payable to the Fresno County Clerk and submitted no later than three (3) days following action on Planning Project No. 24-27.

3. Approval of Planning Project No. 24-27 and the associated site plan shall be valid for a period not to exceed two (2) years from the date of approval unless a building permit for the facility described herein has been issued by the Building Department and construction is being diligently pursued. The Applicant may request an extension of up to two (2) additional years via written request to the Community & Economic Development Department submitted not less than thirty (30) days prior to expiration of this approval.

Requests for extensions of time are subject to findings being made for the request.

4. Approval of Planning Project No. 24-27 and its associated site plan shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the Applicant and/or the authorized representative, engineer, or surveyor to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property, the proposed use, and the submitted plans.

5. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the plans approved by the City Council and the subject conditions contained herein. Minor modifications to the approved plans necessary to meet regulatory, engineering, or similar constraints may be made at the discretion of the City Planner without amendment to Planning Project No. 24-

27. 6. Any proposed signs are subject to review and approval by the City Planner by means of a separate Sign Review process.

7. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner, operator, and/or management to ensure that any required permits, inspections, and approvals from any regulatory agency be obtained from the applicable agency prior to issuance of a building permit and/or the issuance of a certificate of completion, as determined appropriate by the City of Fowler Community & Economic Development Department.

8. All conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy approval for any portion of the Project.

Failure to comply with all conditions of approval shall be grounds for the imposition of penalties, suspension of the permit, modification of the permit, or revocation of the permit. 597
Section 10, Item E

9. The operator shall keep the exterior premises free of trash and debris. Graffiti shall be removed or covered within 48 hours of its discovery by the Applicant, manager, or any employee.

10. Approval of Planning Project No. 24-27 is not an authorization to commence construction.

On- and off-site improvements, building construction, sign erection or occupancy shall not be permitted without prior approval of the City through issuance of any required grading or building permits.

11. A copy of these conditions must be kept on the premises and be shown to any requesting City official. Failure to comply with all conditions of approval shall be grounds for the imposition of penalties, modification of the permit, or revocation of the permit.

12. All business and processes shall be conducted within a completely enclosed structure, except for off-street parking and loading areas, service stations, outdoor dining areas, nurseries, garden shops, signs, Christmas tree sales lots, bus depots, and transit stations, public utility stations and car sales.

13. No use shall be permitted, and no process, equipment or materials shall be used that are found by the City to be objectionable to persons living or working in the vicinity by reasons of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination, glare, or unsightliness or to involve any hazard of fire or explosion.

14. The Project shall conform to the C-1 (Nieghborhood Commercial) zone district development standards. Any deviation from these standards shall result in the requirement for a variance or minor deviation.

15. All contractors or sub-contractors working in the City must obtain a business license from the Finance Department at Fowler City Hall. The Applicant shall report applicable sales tax revenue to the State.

16. The Applicant shall pay all fees as required by existing ordinances and schedules. The fees to be paid shall be those in effect at the time of payment.

17. New mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened from view.

18. Construction shall occur only between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm in accordance with Fowler Municipal Code section 5-21.601, subdivision (d).

19. The Applicant shall at all times hold all required permits and approvals from local, State, and federal agencies.

20. The gas station operator shall hold a current Hazardous Materials Business Plan and all related permits and approvals at all times.

21. Approval of the CUP is contingent upon the LLA being recorded.

22. An active Type 20 alcohol license, issued by the California Department of Beverage Control, must be held at any point while the convenience store is offering the sale of alcohol. No type of alcohol approved other than through a Type 20 permit shall be offered 598
Section 10, Item E
for sale. No consumption of alcohol may occur on site. Notwithstanding, the future tenant space may apply for an on-sale alcohol license in the future.

23. The convenience store operator shall hold an approved tobacco retailer license at all times that tobacco products and paraphernalia are offered for sale. The operator shall follow all applicable regulations regarding the sale of tobacco products and paraphernalia set by the City and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

Lighting

24. All lighting shall be hooded and directed to not shine towards adjacent properties and public streets. Lighting shall be approved by the City Engineer.

Off-Street Parking

25. Any new on-site parking stalls shall be striped and constructed to current City standards, including for aisle width.

26. All parking areas shall have adequate ingress and egress to and from a street or alley.

Sufficient room for turning and maneuvering vehicles shall be provided on the site, pursuant to current City standards.

27. All construction of new parking stalls shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction and the acquisition of building permits.

Landscaping Standards

28. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Fowler Zoning Ordinance Chapter

9.165.

29. A minimum of 10% of the surface area of the site shall be landscaped, in accordance with General Plan Policy CDES-20.

30. All parking areas shall achieve a minimum 50% shading of the paved area by the tree canopies within 15 years of planting, in accordance with Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section

9.165.040(E).

31. Landscaping shall be kept free from weeds and litter.

32. One medium-sized street tree shall be required at one (1) tree for every thirty (30) linear feet within the public right-of-way frontage, not including alleys. Street trees shall be planted within the public right-of-way. Such trees shall not be removed without replacement and such replacement tree shall be of an approved street tree type. All trees required shall be a minimum 15-gallon size at the time of planting. Street trees shall be planted within tree wells using a frame and grate consistent with City Standard M-15.

33. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect and submitted as part of the submittals for a building permit. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Community & Economic Development Department prior to issuance of building permits. Such plans shall indicate the location and type of vegetation existing and proposed on-site.

34. The property owner shall maintain all landscaping in a healthy and well-manicured appearance to achieve and maintain the landscaping design that was approved by the City. 599
Section 10, Item E
This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring properly operating irrigation equipment at all times, trimming and pruning of trees and shrubs, and replacing dead or unhealthy vegetation with drought-tolerant plantings.

35. Any unpaved ground area shall be improved with a combination of turf, groundcover, flowering vegetation, or climbing vines.

36. All turf grass must be sodded at installation (if applicable).

37. In addition to the lot, the owner must maintain the portion of the streetscape between their lot line and the curb.

Fire Department

38. A flow test is required to establish the current available fire flow. The plans indicate this is on the other side of S. Fowler Ave. If this is intended to become a divided road like Golden State, then a new street hydrant is mandatory. Flow test will determine if fire sprinklers are required.

39. One 4A40BC or larger fire extinguisher is required at the fuel pumps.

40. One 2A10BC rated fire extinguisher is required for each 3000 square feet of the retail areas.

41. Fire lanes shall be posted on site as applicable.

42. All special requirements for fuel dispensing shall be provided during the building permit stage.

43. The LPG tank must comply with setback requirements of the California Fire Code.

Police Department

44. Two ALPR readers shall be installed on-site at locations confirmed by the City of Fowler Police Department.

45. A duress alarm shall be installed.

46. Enhanced, high resolution video cameras shall be installed on the interior and exterior of the building at locations confirmed by the City of Fowler Police Department.

47. Engineering Conditions
General:

48. All proposals of the Applicant shall be conditions of approval, except as further modified below, and subject to modifications to conform to applicable City Standards.

49. The proposed trash enclosure shall be constructed to current City standards and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The enclosure shall be of sufficient size to accommodate containers for refuse, green waste, and recycling.

50. Any existing utility poles and overhead lines shall be undergrounded.

51. All new electric, cable TV, telephone, internet, etc. services provided to the development shall be underground (if applicable).

52. Unlevel or hazardous concrete sidewalk along the building frontage shall be replaced (if applicable).
600
Section 10, Item E

53. The Applicant shall construct a roundabout at the intersection of State Route 99 Off Ramp and W. Merced Street and at State Route 99 Northbound Ramps and W. Merced Street. “Quick-build” roundabouts may be constructed at each of the two intersections to satisfy the requirements of this condition with review and approval by both the City Engineer and Caltrans.

54. The Applicant shall pay the Project’s equitable fair share contribution for the ultimate construction of two permanent roundabouts approved by the City Engineer and Caltrans at the intersection of State Route 99 Off Ramp and W. Merced Street and at State Route 99 Northbound Ramps and W. Merced Street. The Project’s equitable fair share cost of improvements for these two intersections includes both the design and construction cost for permanent roundabouts, however the Project’s fair share cost will be applied to the design and construction of quick-build roundabouts at the two intersections.

55. The Applicant shall pay the Project’s equitable fair share contribution for future improvements to the intersection of W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue.

56. The Applicant shall enter into a fair share reimbursement agreement with the City of Fowler for the reimbursement of any costs associated with the required infrastructure improvements in excess of the Project’s equitable fair share amount.

Circulation:

57. The Applicant shall pay the Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee to the Fresno Council of Governments.

58. The parking lot shall be paved with asphalt or concrete, shall be properly lit and landscaped and shall comply with the Fowler Improvement Standards.

59. Drive aisles shall be kept unobstructed at all times. Vehicles shall not block driveways.

60. Queueing of the drive through shall not result in blockages of the drive aisles, or result in unsafe circulation conditions.

Grading and Drainage:

61. A Grading and Site Improvement Plan for the proposed on-site improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall obtain a Grading and Site Improvement Permit once plans are approved. Improvement plans shall indicate the site can adequately drain to a City storm drain facility or if drainage can adequately be contained on-site.

Water/Sewer:

62. Any water connections, whether existing or proposed, shall be shown on the site plan.

63. The building shall be provided with domestic and landscape water services as approved by the City Engineer. Services shall be adjusted or upgraded to meet current City standards (if applicable).

64. The Applicant shall provide and install water meters and appropriate backflow devices (where required by City ordinances and standards). Existing water meters in conflict with improvements or in a non-standard location shall be relocated as directed by the Public Works Director.
601
Section 10, Item E

65. Complete and submit the Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District (SKF) commercial sewer connection application. Provide documentation of the completed lot line merger with the application.

66. Provide a set of detailed floor and plumbing plans for sewer evaluation.

67. Pre-treatment will be required for a food service establishment (Must be sized accordingly.

Minimum 1,500-gal grease interceptor).

68. Pre-treatment will be required for any Carwash or service station (Must be sized accordingly. Minimum 1,500-gal sand/Oil separator).

69. Install 6-inch sewer service lateral with cleanout and box the reads “SEWER” at the property line.

70. Buildings shall be metered separately from the landscaping.

71. Applicant to pay for the SKF sewer connection and plan check/inspection fees prior to the issuance of the building permit.

72. SKF shall provide an inspection.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

73. The Applicant shall consult with and shall comply with the requirements of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, including but not limited to compliance with Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) and Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review).

City of Fowler General Plan Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measures

74. The Project shall be constructed with electrically-powered appliances and building mechanical equipment in place of natural-gas fueled equipment.

75. The Project shall, to the maximum extent possible, exceed the California Green Building Standard Code Tier 2 requirements for electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

Other

76. Approval of this Project is for the benefit of the Applicant. The submittal of applications by Applicant for this Project was a voluntary act on the part of the Applicant not required by the City. Therefore, as a condition of approval of this Project, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Fowler and its agents, officers, consultants, independent contractors and employees (“City”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City concerning the Project, including any challenges to associated environmental review, and for any and all costs, attorneys fees, and damages arising therefrom (collectively “Claim”).

The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing in this condition shall obligate the City to defend any Claim and the City shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by 602
Section 10, Item E
the City, unless the City approves the settlement in writing. Nor shall the City be prohibited from independently defending any Claim, and if the City does decide to independently defend a Claim, the Applicant shall be responsible for City’s attorneys’ fees, expenses of litigation and costs for that independent defense, including the costs of preparing any required administrative record. Should the City decide to independently defend any Claim, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim unless the Applicant approves the settlement.

Signature of Applicant: ________________________________ Dated: ________________
603
Section 10, Item E

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 2, 2025
FROM: MATT FLOOD, Community & Economic Development Director SUBJECT: APPROVE Resolution No. 2817:
i. Finding that the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement qualifies for a Class 12 categorical exemption under CEQA.
ii. APPROVE a Disposition and Development Agreement
with Mailbox Money LLC for the property located at the
northwest corner of South 7th Street and East Vine
Street, .85 acres consisting of two parcels (APNs 343-
233-02ST and 343-233-03ST).
iii. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the agreement and carry out the processes necessary to culminate the
agreement.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Consideration of a resolution to approve a Disposition and Development Agreement (“DDA”) with Mailbox Money LLC (“Developer”), for property located at 7th Street and East Vine Street.

Approval of the DDA would result in the property being sold to the Developer, developed, and within 30 days of receiving certificates of occupancy the Developer must begin to market the proposed residential and commercial uses.

BACKGROUND
History
On May 18, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2503 to declare two (2) parcels (APNs 343-233-02ST and 343-233-03ST) consisting of approximately .85 acres of City-owned property located at South 7th Street and East Vine Street (the “Property”) as surplus land in accordance with the Surplus Land Act. (Gov. Code § 54220, et seq.) City staff then solicited proposals from qualified developers and, in coordination with the City Attorney, began negotiations with the representatives of Mailbox Money LLC to ensure that the DDA included conditions requiring appropriate development of the Property for the community’s benefit.

These efforts culminated in DDA attached hereto, whose principal provisions include:
604
Section 10, Item F
 The Property will be sold for $210,000, with the Developer paying $100,000 upon close of escrow, and the remaining $110,000 within two (2) years of the close of escrow.  City retains the option to purchase Property back within 10 years in the event Developer fails to attract/establish conforming business activities on the Property, and a 50-year Right of First Refusal whenever the Developer decides to transfer the Property.  Developer must obtain all necessary permits and work with the City to ensure the intent of the agreement is carried out. The City must work diligently and reasonably with Developer to achieve the same.
 Developer must have at least 2,400 square feet of retail/commercial space.  All liens, holds, and covenants encumbering the Property will be released by the City upon the Developer’s completion of every condition required under the DDA.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda. The City satisfied its obligations under the Surplus Land Act following the adoption of Resolution No. 2503 on May 18, 2021.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action qualifies for a Class 12 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because the action involves the sale of surplus government property that is not located within an area of statewide, regional, or areawide concern as identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15206, subdivision (b)(4). (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15312.) Furthermore, the Property does not have significant value for wildlife habitat or other environmental purposes. (Id. at subd. (a).)

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with assisting the achievement of many goals within the General Plan, including:

General Plan Goal ED-1
Promote economic development through preparation and implementation of an Economic Development Strategy.

General Plan Goal ED-2
Establish a process to work with landowners and business owners to encourage their participation in implementing the City’s economic development goals and policies.

General Plan Goal ED-4
Promote rehabilitation of commercial sites.

General Plan Goal ED-5
Discourage passive land uses, underutilization of land, and vacant structures on available commercial sites.
605
Section 10, Item F
General Plan Goal ED-6
Encourage activities that attract participants to Fowler and promote economic development.

FISCAL IMPACT
One-time general fund revenue of $210,000 from the sale of the Property; revenue from miscellaneous fees; and future sales tax and other revenue from the development of the Property.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The subject Property was declared to be surplus land consistent with State law and the City of Fowler’s procurement policy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments:
- Resolution No. 2817
- Exhibit “A” – Disposition and Development Agreement with Mailbox Money LLC – 7 th and
Vine
606
Section 10, Item F
RESOLUTION NO. 2817

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER

FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT QUALIFIES FOR A CLASS 12 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA; AND APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

WITH MAILBOX MONEY LLC FOR THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH 7TH STREET AND EAST VINE STREET, IDENTIFIED AS APNS 343-233-02ST AND 343-233-03ST
WHEREAS, the City of Fowler (“City”) is the owner of certain real property located at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and East Vine Street, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 343-233-02ST and 343-233-03ST (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is no longer needed for municipal purposes and on May 18, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2503 determining that the Property constitutes surplus land under the California Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) (Gov. Code § 54220, et seq.); and WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted the required notices of availability to all entities entitled to receive notice, allowed the statutory response period to run, and complied with all additional procedural requirements, including good-faith negotiations where applicable, before offering the Property for sale or development; and
WHEREAS, after fulfilling all obligations under the SLA and receiving no proposals that resulted in a qualifying transaction under the SLA, the City was legally authorized to make the Property available for open-market disposition; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized under California law, including Government Code sections 37350, et seq. and 52201, to dispose of municipal real property and to enter into agreements for the development or reuse of such property when doing so serves a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, Mailbox Money LLC (“Developer”) expressed interest in acquiring and developing the Property and proposed construction of a mixed-use multifamily project including commercial/retail space, consistent with the City’s Form-Based Code and long-term goals for the City’s downtown revitalization; and
WHEREAS, City staff have negotiated a Disposition and Development Agreement (“DDA”) with Developer that provides for the sale of the Property at no less than fair market value and includes requirements for development of the site, design submittals, performance deadlines, land-use approvals, and other safeguards to ensure development of the Property; and WHEREAS, the development of the Property is expected to facilitate productive reuse of surplus municipal land, expand housing opportunities, increase commercial activity, stimulate investment within the downtown core, and provide long-term community benefit; and 607
Section 10, Item F
WHEREAS, disposition of the Property through the DDA will relieve the City of responsibility for maintaining unused or underutilized real property while enabling private investment aligned with the City’s economic development vision; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that approval of the DDA is consistent with the public interest, supports community development goals, and promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City of Fowler; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has had an opportunity to review and consider the entire administrative record relating to the DDA, and reviewed and considered those portions of the administrative record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the item, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fowler as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of the City Council.

2. The City Council finds that approval of the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement (“DDA”) between the City and Mailbox Money LLC qualifies for a Class 12 categorical exemption from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as it relates to the sale of surplus government property.

3. The City Council hereby approves the DDA between the City of Fowler and Mailbox Money LLC for the sale and development of the subject Property, substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit “A” attached herein.

4. The City Manager or his designee is authorized and directed to execute the DDA and all related documents necessary or convenient to carry out the intent of the agreement, with such minor revisions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, may deem necessary and appropriate.

5. City staff are further directed to take all steps required to implement the DDA, including processing of land-use approvals, coordination of closing procedures, and administration of development obligations in accordance with the Schedule of Performance.

6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December 2025, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
608
Section 10, Item F
APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
609
Section 10, Item F
EXHIBIT “A”
610
Section 10, Item F
Recorded By and For the Benefit of,
And When Recorded Return to:

CITY OF FOWLER
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, California 93625
ATTN: City Clerk

DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

FOR THE

TWO ADJACENT PARCELS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SOUTH 7TH AND EAST VINE STREETS

IN FOWLER, CALIFORNIA
APN 343-233-02ST
AND
APN 343‐233‐03ST

BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF FOWLER
AND

MAILBOX MONEY LLC
611
Section 10, Item F
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECITALS.....................................................................................................................................1

1. CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY ..............................................................................1 A. Disposition of The Property...........................................................................................1 B. Purchase Price and Deposit............................................................................................2 C. Escrow............................................................................................................................2 D. Costs of Escrow .............................................................................................................2 E. Escrow Instructions........................................................................................................2 F. Authority of Escrow Agent............................................................................................3 G. Closing ...........................................................................................................................3 H. Termination....................................................................................................................3 I. Closing Procedure..........................................................................................................3 J. Review of Title ..............................................................................................................4 K. Title Insurance ...............................................................................................................5 L. Conditions of Closing ....................................................................................................5 M. Representations and Warranties.....................................................................................6 N. Condition of The Property .............................................................................................8

2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY..........................................................................11 A. Developer’s Obligation to Construct Improvements...................................................11 B. City Obligations with Respect to the Building ............................................................11 C. Design Review.............................................................................................................11 D. Land Use Approvals ....................................................................................................13 E. Schedule of Performance and Conforming Business Activities..................................13 F. Cost of Construction ....................................................................................................14 G. Insurance Requirements...............................................................................................14 H. Developer’s Indemnity.................................................................................................14 I. Rights of Access ..........................................................................................................15 J. Compliance with Laws ................................................................................................15 K. Nondiscrimination in Employment..............................................................................15 L. Taxes and Assessments................................................................................................15 M. Release of Construction Covenants.............................................................................15 N. Financing of Improvements.........................................................................................16

3. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES...........................................................................................19 A. Default Remedies.........................................................................................................19 B. Institution of Legal Actions.........................................................................................19 C. Termination by the Developer Prior to Conveyance of the Property ..........................19 D. Termination by the City Prior to Conveyance of the Property. ...................................19 612
Section 10, Item F
ii
E. Reentry and Revesting of Title in the City for Failure to Timely Commence and Complete Developer Improvements, Begin Operation of Conforming Business Activities, or for an Unlawful Transfer........................................................................20 F. Option to Purchase property After Completion of Developer Improvements and Operation of Conforming Business Activities.............................................................22 G. Right of First Refusal ..................................................................................................22

4. GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................................23 A. Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties ....................................24 B. Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance .................................................24 C. Transfers of Interest in Property or Agreement ...........................................................24 D. Successors and Assigns................................................................................................25 E. Assignment by City......................................................................................................25 F. Relationship Between City and Developer..................................................................25 G. No Third Party Beneficiaries Excepting Agency.........................................................26 H. City Approvals and Actions.........................................................................................26 I. Counterparts.................................................................................................................26 J. Integration....................................................................................................................26 K. Real Estate Brokerage Commission.............................................................................26 L. Interpretation................................................................................................................26 M. No Waiver....................................................................................................................26 N. Modifications...............................................................................................................27 O. Severability ..................................................................................................................27 P. Legal Advice................................................................................................................27 Q. Cooperation..................................................................................................................27 R. Rights and remedies are Cumulative ...........................................................................27 S. Applicable Law............................................................................................................27 T. Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of the City.................................................27 U. Attorneys’ Fees............................................................................................................27 V. Precedence of Documents............................................................................................28

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment No. 1: Legal Description and depiction of Property...........................................30 Attachment No. 2: Form of Grant Deed.................................................................................31 Attachment No. 3: Schedule of Performance .........................................................................34 Attachment No. 4: Release of Construction Covenants.........................................................37 Attachment No. 5: Notice of Reversionary Interest...............................................................40 Attachment No. 6: Declaration of Construction Covenants...................................................42 613
Section 10, Item F
1 DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Disposition and Development Agreement (“Agreement” or “DDA”) is entered into on December 2, 2025 (“Effective Date”), between the City of Fowler, a California municipal corporation and general law city (“City”) and Mailbox Money LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “parties” and individually as a “party”, with respect to the following Recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement:

RECITALS
A. City owns two parcels of real property at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and East Vine Street (APNs 343-233-02ST and 343-233-03ST) in the City of Fowler, Fresno County, State of California, (“Property”). The Property is legally described and depicted in Attachment No. 1. The Property consists of approximately 0.85 acre. The Property is in the Form-Based Code zone district, allowing a multitude of uses compatible with the central business district.

B. After following the California Surplus Land Act, the City made the Property available for sale and private development. Developer expressed interest in purchasing the Property to develop a mixed-use multifamily development with at least 2,400 square feet of commercial/retail shell space, and/or other permissible uses. These uses shall hereinafter be referred to as “Conforming Business Activities.”
C. Developer is an experienced commercial developer or has otherwise contracted with experienced commercial developers, contractors, architects, and other professionals for the purposes of developing the Property for viable commercial business(es). City desires to sell the Property to Developer for the purposes set forth in these Recitals, and as further described herein.

The improvements to the Property required by this Agreement is a mixed-use multifamily development with at least 2,400 square feet of commercial/retail shell space, and/or other permissible uses, hereinafter referred to as “Developer Improvements” or “Improvements” as further described under Section 2A herein.

D. City’s disposition of the Property, and the construction, completion, and operation of the Developer Improvements pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, are in the vital and best interest of the City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and will serve the public purpose of real property redevelopment in City’s downtown.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Developer agree as follows:

1. CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY
A. Disposition of the Property. Developer agrees to purchase the Property from City, and City agrees to sell the Property to Developer, in accordance with and subject to 614
Section 10, Item F
2 all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement, for the “Purchase Price” set forth below. The conveyance of the Property shall be by “Grant Deed” substantially in the form of Attachment No. 2. The Property, subject to this sale, shall include all of City’s right, title and interest in and to all rights, privileges, easements and appurtenances benefiting the real property and any improvements located thereon, including, without limitation, City’s right, title and interest, if any, in and to all mineral and water rights and all easements, rights-of-way and other appurtenances used or connected with the beneficial use or enjoyment of the real property.

B. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property shall be Two Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($210,000.00) (“Purchase Price”). The parties agree the Purchase Price constitutes not less than fair market value of the Property and the rights conveyed, and does not reflect any economic assistance by City. Developer shall pay the Purchase Price to City in accordance with the following payment schedule:
$100,000.00 upon Close of Escrow
$110,000.00 within two (2) years from Close of Escrow
The balance of the Purchase Price shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule above. Developer may prepay the remaining balance of the Purchase Price at any time in its sole and absolute discretion.

C. Escrow. Within ten (10) days after the execution of this Agreement by both parties, the parties shall open escrow (“Escrow”) with the Old Republic Title Company in its Kingsburg office, or another escrow company mutually satisfactory to both parties (“Escrow Agent”).

D. Costs of Escrow. The City and the Developer shall each pay its respective share of the premium for the Title Policy as set forth in Section 1K hereof, the City shall pay the documentary transfer taxes due, if any, with respect to the conveyance of the Property, and the parties shall each pay one-half of all other usual and customary fees, charges, and costs which arise from Escrow.

E. Escrow Instructions. This Agreement constitutes the joint escrow instructions of Developer and City, and Escrow Agent to whom these instructions are delivered is hereby empowered to act under this Agreement. The parties agree to diligently pursue and do all acts reasonably necessary to close this Escrow as efficiently as possible.

If in the opinion of Developer or the City’s City Manager it is necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the Closing, such party may require that the parties sign supplemental escrow instructions; provided that if there is any inconsistency between this Agreement and the supplemental escrow instructions, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. The parties agree to execute such other and further documents as may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement. 615
Section 10, Item F
3 F. Authority of Escrow Agent. Escrow Agent is authorized to, and shall:
(1) Pay and charge Developer and City for their respective shares of the premium of the Title Policy and any endorsements thereto as set forth in Section 1K and any amount necessary to place title in the condition necessary to satisfy Section 1J of this Agreement. (2) Pay and charge Developer and City each for one-half of any escrow fees, charges, and costs payable under Section 1D of this Agreement.
(3) Disburse funds and deliver and record the Grant Deed when both the Developer’s Conditions of Closing and the City’s Conditions of Closing as described in Section 1L herein have been fulfilled or waived by Developer and City.
(4) Do such other actions as necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. (5) Do such other actions as necessary to comply with any federal, state, or local reporting requirements, including directing City and Developer to execute any required forms, statements, or certificates.

G. Closing. This transaction shall close escrow (“Closing”) after satisfaction or waiver of all of City and Developer Conditions of Closing as set forth in Section 1L of this Agreement, but in no event later than one year (365 days) after Escrow is opened (“Closing Deadline”), unless otherwise extended by written agreement approved by the City’s City Council and signed by Developer and the City Manager. Closing shall mean the time and day the Grant Deed is filed for record with the Fresno County Recorder.

H. Termination. If Escrow is not in condition to close by the Closing Deadline, then either party which is not then in Default beyond any applicable cure period (and has not received Notice of a potential Default hereunder which has not been cured) may, in writing, demand termination of the Escrow. Under these circumstances, Escrow Agent shall return all money, papers, and documents deposited in Escrow to the respective depositing party, except that Developer Deposit shall be delivered to City in accordance with Section 1B above unless otherwise provided in Section 1B. If either party makes a written demand for termination of Escrow, Escrow shall not terminate until ten (10) days after Escrow Agent shall have delivered copies of such demand to the other party at the address shown in this Agreement. If any objections are raised within that ten (10) day period, Escrow Agent is authorized to hold all money, papers, and documents until instructed by a court of competent jurisdiction or by mutual written instructions of the parties. Termination of Escrow shall be without prejudice as to whatever legal rights either party may have against the other arising from this Agreement. If no demands for delay are made, Escrow Agent shall proceed with Closing as soon as possible.

I. Closing Procedure. Escrow Agent shall close Escrow as follows:
(1) Record the Grant Deed with instructions for the Fresno County Recorder to deliver the Grant Deed to Developer.
616
Section 10, Item F
4 (2) Instruct the Title Company to deliver the Title Policy to Developer and a copy of the Title Policy to City.
(3) File and deliver any informational reports, forms, statements, and certificates as required by federal, state or local law.
(4) Forward to both Developer and City a separate accounting of all funds received and disbursed for each party and copies of all executed and recorded or filed documents deposited into Escrow, with such recording and filing date and information endorsed thereon.

J. Review of Title. City shall cause Escrow Agent to deliver to Developer a standard preliminary title report (“Title Report”) with respect to title to the Property, together with legible copies of the documents underlying the exceptions (“Exceptions”) set forth in the Title Report, within fifteen (15) days after the Escrow is opened. Developer shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Exceptions; provided Developer hereby approves the following Exceptions:
(1) Any Redevelopment Plans of the former Fowler Redevelopment Agency which do not preclude or materially interfere with Developer’s use of the Property as proposed herein. (2) The lien of any non-delinquent property taxes and assessments (to be prorated at Closing).
(3) Such other exceptions to title as may hereafter be mutually approved by City and Developer.

Developer shall have thirty (30) days from the date of its receipt of the Title Report to give written notice to City and Escrow Agent of Developer’s approval or disapproval of any of the Exceptions. Developer’s failure to give written approval of the Title Report within such time limit shall be deemed disapproval of the Title Report. If Developer notifies City of its disapproval of any Exceptions in the Title Report, City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to remove any disapproved Exceptions within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice of the Developer’s disapproval or provide assurances satisfactory to Developer that such Exception(s) will be removed on or before Closing. If City cannot or does not elect to remove any of the disapproved Exceptions within that period, Developer shall have fifteen (15) days after the expiration of the thirty (30) day period to either give City written Notice that the Developer elects to proceed with the purchase of the Property subject to the disapproved Exceptions or to give City written Notice that the Developer elects to terminate this Agreement and the Developer’s failure to give timely written Notice shall be deemed as an election to terminate this Agreement in which case this Agreement shall terminate, Escrow Agent will return the any deposit in Escrow to the party depositing such and the parties will have no further obligations under this Agreement except for those that expressly survive the termination hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall be obligated to remove or eliminate as exceptions to title to the Property as of the Closing all (a) liens secured by deeds of trust, (b) other monetary liens, (c) mechanics’ liens on the Property, (d) judgment liens, and (e) delinquent taxes (herein “Monetary Liens”), all of which constitute disapproved Exceptions. 617
Section 10, Item F
5 The Exceptions to title approved by Developer as provided herein shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Condition of Title.” The Developer shall have the right to approve or disapprove any further Exceptions reported by the Title Company after the Developer has approved the Condition of Title for the Property (which are not created by the Developer). City shall not voluntarily create any new exceptions to title following the Date of Agreement.

K. Title Insurance. Upon recordation of the Grant Deed, the Title Company shall issue to Developer a California Land Title Association (CLTA) policy of title insurance (“Title Policy”), together with such endorsements as are reasonably requested by Developer, issued by the Title Company insuring the title to the Property is vested in Developer in the condition required by Section 1J of this Agreement. The Title Policy shall be for the amount of the Purchase Price. The Title Company shall provide City with a copy of the Title Policy. City shall pay the portion of the premium for the Title Policy equal to the cost of a CLTA standard policy of title insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price, and the Developer shall pay for any additional costs thereof, including the incremental additional cost of obtaining extended coverage in excess of a standard CLTA policy or any endorsements to the title policy, and the cost of any survey which is performed, if requested by Developer in its sole and absolute discretion.

L. Conditions of Closing. Closing is conditioned upon satisfaction or waiver by the benefiting Party of the following terms and conditions within the times designated below:
(1) City’s Conditions of Closing. City’s obligation to proceed with Closing is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by City of each and all of the conditions precedent (a) through (f), inclusive, described below (“City Conditions of Closing”), which are solely for the benefit of City, and which shall be fulfilled or waived by the time periods provided for herein:
(a) No Default. Prior to the Close of Escrow, Developer shall not be in material default in any of its obligations under the terms of this Agreement beyond any applicable cure periods and all representations and warranties of Developer contained herein shall be true and correct in all material respects.
(b) Execution of Documents. Developer shall have executed such documents required hereunder and delivered such documents into Escrow.
(c) Payment of Funds. Prior to Closing, Developer shall have deposited the Developer Deposit and all required costs of Closing into Escrow in accordance with Sections 1B and 1D hereof.
(d) Financing. Developer shall have provided evidence of Construction Financing to complete the Developer Improvements, as provided in Section 2N hereof, and such financing shall fund prior to Closing, or be ready to fund within thirty (30) days after Closing. (e) Design Review. Developer shall have obtained City approval of Development Plans, as provided for in Section 2C, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed by City, with the expectation and understanding that City will expeditiously review and diligently process such Development Plans.
618
Section 10, Item F
6 (f) Insurance. Developer shall have provided proof of insurance as required by Section 2F hereof.
(2) Developer’s Conditions of Closing. Developer’s obligation to proceed with Closing of the purchase of the Property is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by Developer of each and all the conditions precedent (a) through (f), inclusive, described below (“Developer Conditions of Closing”), which are solely for the benefit of Developer, and which shall be fulfilled or waived by the time periods provided for herein:
(a) No Default. Prior to the Close of Escrow, City shall not be in material default in any of its obligations under the terms of this Agreement and all representations and warranties of City contained herein shall be true and correct in all material respects. (b) Execution of Documents. City shall have executed the Grant Deed and any other documents required hereunder and delivered such documents into Escrow. (c) Review and Approval of Title. Developer shall have reviewed and approved the condition of title of The Property, as provided in Section 1J hereof. (d) Title Policy. The Title Company shall, upon payment of Title Company’s regularly scheduled premium, have agreed to provide to Developer the Title Policy for the Property upon Close of Escrow, in accordance with Section 1K hereof.
(e) Due Diligence. Developer shall have determined in its sole and absolute discretion that the condition of the Property is acceptable; and the Property is suitable for the proposed development pursuant to Section 1N.
(f) Land Use Approvals. Developer shall have obtained approval of any Land Use Entitlements for the Developer Improvements, as provided for in Section 2D with the expectation and understanding that City will expedite review and diligently process such entitlements. (g) Developer Improvements Approval. Developer shall have obtained approval from the City for Developer Improvements.

M. Representations and Warranties.
(1) City Representations. City represents and warrants to Developer, on the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing as follows:
(a) Authority. City has the full right, power and lawful authority to acquire, grant, sell and convey the Property as provided herein, and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by City has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of City. (b) Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA). City is not a “foreign person” within the parameters of FIRPTA or any similar state statute, or is exempt from 619
Section 10, Item F
7 the provisions of FIRPTA or any similar state statute, or that City has complied and will comply with all the requirements under FIRPTA or any similar state statute. (c) No Conflict. To the best of City’s knowledge, City’s execution, delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which City is a party or by which it is bound. (d) Litigation. To the best of City’s knowledge, there are no actions, suits, material claims, legal proceedings or any other proceedings affecting the Property, or any portion thereof, at law or in equity, before any court or governmental agency, domestic or foreign. (e) The Property is not subject to any contractual agreements which will be binding upon Developer or the Property after the Closing.
(f) There are no leases, licenses or other occupancy agreements on the Property.

Until Closing, City shall, upon learning of any fact or condition that would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section 1M(1) not to be true as of Closing, immediately give written notice of such fact or condition to Developer. Such exception(s) to a representation shall not be deemed a breach by City hereunder but shall constitute an exception which Developer shall have a right to approve or disapprove if such exception would have an impact on the value, occupancy, use, development and/or operation of The Property. If Developer elects to close Escrow following disclosure of such information, City’s representations and warranties contained herein shall be deemed to have been made as of Closing, subject to such exception(s). If, following the disclosure of such information, Developer elects to not close Escrow, then this Agreement and Escrow shall automatically terminate, and neither party shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder. Under these circumstances the Developer Deposit shall be returned to Developer.

All of the representations and warranties set forth in this Section 1M(1) are made with the acknowledgment that they are material, and with the intention that Developer shall rely upon them as inducements to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and to close the transactions contemplated herein. The representations and warranties contained in this Section 1M(1) shall each survive the execution of this Agreement and Closing. (2) Developer Representations. Developer represents and warrants to City as follows:
(a) Authority. Developer has the full right, power and lawful authority to purchase and accept the conveyance of the Property, or any portion thereof, and undertake all obligations as provided herein and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by Developer has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of Developer. (b) Experience. Developer is an experienced developer and operator of commercial properties, or has otherwise contracted with experienced commercial developers, contractors, architects, and other professionals for the purposes of developing the Property. 620
Section 10, Item F
8 (c) No Conflict. To the best of Developer’s knowledge, Developer’s execution, delivery, and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which Developer is a party or by which it is bound.
(d) No Developer Bankruptcy. Developer is not the subject of a bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding.
(e) FIRPTA. Developer is not a “foreign person” within the parameters of FIRPTA or any similar state statute or is exempt from the provisions of FIRPTA or any similar state statute, or Developer has complied and will comply with all the requirements under FIRPTA or any similar state statute.
(f) Deliveries. All documents, instruments and other information delivered by Developer to City pursuant to this Agreement are, to the best of Developer’s knowledge, true, correct and complete.
(g) Commissions. To the best of the Developer’s knowledge, there are no broker’s commissions or finder’s fees payable in connection with The Property.

Until Closing, the Developer shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section 1M(2) not to be true as of the Closing, immediately give written notice of such fact or condition to City. Such exception(s) to a representation shall not be deemed a breach by Developer hereunder but shall constitute an exception which City shall have a right to approve or disapprove if such exception would have an effect on the value and/or operation of the Property. If City elects to close Escrow following disclosure of such information, Developer’s representations and warranties contained herein shall be deemed to have been made as of Closing, subject to such exception(s). If, following the disclosure of such information, City elects to not close Escrow, then this Agreement and Escrow shall automatically terminate, and neither party shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder.

All of the representations and warranties set forth in this Section 1M(2) are made with the acknowledgment that they are material, and with the intention that City shall rely upon them as inducements to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and to close the transactions contemplated herein. The representations and warranties contained in this Section 1M(2) shall each survive the execution of this Agreement and Closing.

N. Condition of The Property.
(1) Due Diligence and Disclosure. For a period of ninety (90) days from the date of the Agreement (the “Property Approval Period”), Developer shall have the right to review and investigate the physical condition of the Property, the character, quality, value and general utility of the Property, the zoning, land use and building requirements and restrictions applicable to the Property, and any other factors or matters deemed relevant to Developer in its decision to purchase the Property. Developer, in Developer’s sole and absolute discretion, may determine whether or 621
Section 10, Item F
9 not the Property is acceptable to Developer. If, within the Property Approval Period, Developer shall, in Developer's sole and absolute discretion be dissatisfied with the Property for any or no reason, then Developer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by sending written notice of such termination to the City. If Developer elects to terminate this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate, Escrow will return the any Developer Deposit to Developer and the parties will have no further obligations under this Agreement except for those that expressly survive the termination hereof.

Developer acknowledges the Property may contain Hazardous Materials as defined in Section 1N(5). In the event of Closing, it will be Developer’s obligation to take any required remedial actions, at its sole cost and expense, to render the Property suitable for development. In that regard, Developer and City may enter into a Right of Entry Agreement to allow Developer an opportunity to conduct due diligence inspections and testing of the Property, which will remain in place through Closing. Copies of any reports obtained by Developer regarding the condition of the Property shall be provided to City within ten (10) days after receipt and prior to Closing.

Except as noted, City and Developer hereby represent and warrant to the other that they have no actual knowledge and have not received any notice or communication from any government agency having jurisdiction over the Property, notifying such party of the presence of surface or subsurface zone Hazardous Materials in, on, or under the Property, or any portion thereof or the existence or prior existence of any above or below ground storage tank on the Property. “Actual knowledge,” as used herein, shall not impose a duty of investigation, and shall be limited to the actual knowledge of City and Developer employees and agents who have participated in the preparation of this Agreement. This representation and warranty shall survive the Closing.
(2) No Further Warranties As To Property; Release of City. Except for City’s express representations, warranties and covenants contained herein and in closing instruments, the conveyance of all or any portion of the Property shall be conveyed to the Developer in an “AS IS” condition, with no warranty, express or implied by City, as to the Property, improvements on the Property, the soil, its geology, the presence of known or unknown faults or Hazardous Materials, and Developer agrees to and shall indemnify and hold City, and their officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and against all liability, loss, damages, costs, or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs) arising from or as a result of the existence of such faults or substances except as provided herein. It shall be the sole responsibility of Developer at his expense to investigate and determine the condition of the soil and improvement conditions on the Property for the development to be constructed. If the soil environmental condition is not in all respects entirely suitable for the use or uses to which the Property will be put, then it is the sole responsibility and obligation of Developer after the Closing to take such action as may be necessary to place the Property in a condition entirely suitable for its development.

Upon the Closing, Developer hereby waives, releases and discharges forever City, and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, from all present and future claims, demands, suits, legal and administrative proceedings and from all liability for damages, losses, costs, liabilities, fees and expenses, present and future, arising out of or in any way connected with the condition of the Property, any Hazardous Materials in or the Property, or the existence of Hazardous Materials 622
Section 10, Item F
10 contamination due to the generation of Hazardous Materials from the Property, however they came to be placed there, except that arising out of the representations and warranties contained herein, any breach by City of this Agreement, or the negligence or misconduct of the City or its employees, officers, agents or representatives.

Developer acknowledges that it is aware of and familiar with the provisions of section 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides as follows:
“A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.”
As such relates to this Section 1N, Developer hereby waives and relinquishes all rights and benefits which it may have under California Civil Code section 1542.

MAILBOX MONEY LLC
By:

Udeyvir Virk, Manager
(3) Developer Precautions After Closing. Upon Closing, Developer shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent the release into the environment of any Hazardous Materials which are located in, on or under the Property. Such precautions shall include compliance by Developer with all governmental requirements with respect to Hazardous Materials. In addition, Developer shall install and utilize such equipment and implement and adhere to such procedures as are consistent with commercially reasonable standards as respects the disclosure, storage, use, removal and disposal of Hazardous Materials to the extent of Developer’s construction, occupancy or use of the Property.
(4) Developer Indemnity. After the Closing, Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City, and its officers, agents, and employees harmless from and against any claim, action, suit, proceeding, loss, cost, damage, liability, deficiency, fine, penalty, punitive damage, or expense (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees), resulting from, arising out of, or based upon: (a) the presence, release, use, generation, discharge, storage or disposal by Developer of any Hazardous Materials on, under, in or about, or the transportation of any such Hazardous Materials to or from, the Property which occurs after Closing; or (b) the violation, or alleged violation, by Developer of any statute, ordinance, order, rule, regulation, permit, judgment or license relating to the use, generation, release, discharge, storage, disposal or transportation of Hazardous Materials on, under, in to or from, the Property which occurs after Closing. This indemnity shall include, without limitation, any damage, liability, fine, penalty, parallel indemnity after closing cost or expense arising from or out of any claim, action, suit or proceeding for personal injury (including sickness, disease or death), tangible or intangible property damage, compensation for lost wages, business income, profits or other economic loss, damage to the natural resource or the 623
Section 10, Item F
11 environment, nuisance, contamination, leak, spill, release or other adverse effect on the environment. At the request of Developer, City shall cooperate with and assist Developer in its defense of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding, loss, cost, damage, liability, deficiency, fine, penalty, punitive damage, or expense; provided that City shall not be obligated to incur any expense in connection with such cooperation or assistance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this indemnity shall not apply to any claims resulting from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its employees, officers, agents or representatives. (5) Hazardous Materials Definition. For purposes of this Section 1N, Hazardous Materials means any substance, material, or waste which is or becomes defined and is regulated as hazardous by any applicable governmental authority, the State of California, or the United States government, but shall not include commercially reasonable amounts of such materials in the ordinary course of the development and operation of the Property which are used and stored in accordance with all applicable environmental laws, ordinances and regulations.

2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.

A. Developer’s Obligation to Construct Improvements. Developer shall develop or cause the development of the Developer Improvements in accordance with the Schedule of Performance (Attachment No. 3), the City of Fowler Municipal Code, and the plans, drawings and documents submitted by Developer and approved by City as set forth herein.

B. City Obligations With Respect to the Site.
(1) Prior to the Closing, the City at its expense will remove any City owned property, including, but not limited to, equipment or trade fixtures from the site prior to Close of Escrow.

C. Design Review.
(1) Design, Site Plan, and Construction Drawings. Within the respective times set forth in the Schedule of Performance, Developer shall submit the following:
(a) Design drawings for the Developer Improvements, including materials, color board, elevations of all four (4) facades of the Developer Improvements, and a rendered perspective, as required by City’s Community Development Director and in conformance with applicable City Code and guidelines (“Design Drawings”). (b) Site plan as required by City’s Community Development Director and in conformance with City guidelines (“Site Plan”).
(c) Detailed construction plans and drawings prepared by a licensed architect and/or registered civil engineer, as required by State law, with respect to the Developer Improvements (“Construction Plans”).

The Design Drawings, Site Plan, and Construction Plans are collectively referred to as the “Development Plans”.
624
Section 10, Item F
12 (2) City Review and Approval. City shall have the right to review and approve the Development Plans, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. City will at all times expedite processing and review of the Development Plans. Developer acknowledges and agrees that City approval is required in order to satisfy City’s obligation to promote the sound development and redevelopment of land within the former redevelopment project area, to promote a high level of design which will impact the surrounding development, and to provide an environment for the social, economic and psychological growth and well-being of the citizens of the City of Fowler. Developer shall not be entitled to any monetary damages or compensation as a result of the City’s reasonable disapproval of the Development Plans.

Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to contrary effect, the times for review and action upon the Development Plans by City shall not be deemed to be commenced unless and until the corresponding submittals by Developer are complete.

City shall state in writing the reasons for disapproval. Developer, upon receipt of a disapproval based upon powers reserved by the City hereunder, shall revise such portions and resubmit to City by the time established therefor in the Schedule of Performance. (3) Consultation and Coordination. During the preparation of the Development Plans, staff of City and Developer shall hold regular progress meetings to coordinate the preparation of, submission to, and review of the Development Plans. The staff of City and Developer shall communicate and consult informally as frequently as is necessary to ensure that the formal submittal of any documents to City can receive prompt, efficient and thorough consideration. City shall designate an employee to serve as the project manager who is responsible for the coordination of City’s activities under this Agreement and for expediting the land use approval and permitting process.
(4) Revisions. If Developer desires to propose any revisions to City-approved Development Plans, Developer shall submit such proposed changes to City, and shall also proceed in accordance with any and all State and local laws and regulations regarding such revisions, within the time frame set forth in the Schedule of Performance. At the sole discretion of City, if any material change in the Conforming Business Activities of the Property is proposed in the Development Plans from the basic uses of the Property as provided for in this Agreement, then this Agreement is subject to renegotiation of all terms and conditions. If the Development Plans, as modified by the proposed change, generally and substantially conform to the requirements of this Section 2C, the City Manager shall review the proposed change and notify the Developer in writing within thirty (30) days after submission to City as to whether the proposed change is approved or disapproved. The City Manager is authorized to approve changes to City-approved Development Plans provided such changes: (a) do not significantly modify the scope and character of the Improvements; (b) do not reduce the quality of materials to be used; and (c) do not reduce the imaginative and unique qualities of the project design. Any and all change orders or revisions required by City and its inspectors which are required under the Municipal Code and all other applicable codes (e.g., Building, Plumbing, Fire, Electrical, etc.) and under other applicable laws and regulations shall be included by Developer in its Development Plans and completed during construction of the Developer Improvements.
625
Section 10, Item F
13 (5) Defects in Plans. City shall not be responsible either to Developer or to third parties in any way for any defects in the Development Plans, nor for any structural or other defects in any work done according to the approved Development Plans, nor for any delays caused by the review and approval processes established by this Section 2C provided that such review remains prompt and efficient as required herein. Developer shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend City, and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, from and against any claims, suits for damages to property or injuries to persons arising out of or in any way relating to defects in the Development Plans, including without limitation the violation of any laws, and for defects in any work done according to the approved Development Plans.
(6) Use of Plans. City shall not have the right to use Development Plans which are submitted to City by Developer pursuant to this Section 2C, nor shall the City assign, transfer or confer any rights to use such drawings or plans to any person or entity. (7) Special Design Provisions. Reserved.

D. Land Use Approvals.
(1) Land Use Entitlements. Within the respective times set forth in the Schedule of Performance, Developer shall secure, or cause to be secured, all land use and other discretionary entitlements by City or any other governmental agency necessary to complete the Developer Improvements.
(2) Other Approvals. Before commencement of construction of Developer Improvements or other related works of improvement by Developer upon or adjacent to the Property, Developer shall secure or cause to be secured any other permits and approvals which may be required by City or any other governmental agency affected by such construction or work. (3) Developer Cost and Expense. All land use entitlements and other permits for the Property shall be secured by Developer at Developer’s sole cost and expense. (4) No Precommitment by City. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or shall operate to commit City’s discretion with respect to land use and other entitlements, permits, and approvals which may be required by Developer with respect to the Developer Improvements.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, City does commit to diligently review and process such land use and other entitlements, permits, and approvals which may be required by Developer E. Schedule of Performance and Conforming Business Activities. (1) Schedule of Performance. Developer shall submit all Development Plans, obtain Land Use Approvals, commence and complete all construction of the Developer Improvements, and satisfy all other obligations and conditions of this Agreement, within the respective times established therefore in the Schedule of Performance as further described in Attachment No. 3. The Schedule of Performance shall be deemed a material part of this Agreement.
626
Section 10, Item F
14 (2) Conforming Business Activities. Within a reasonable period of time following the completion of the Developer Improvements, not to exceed thirty (30) days after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall commence marketing of the multifamily and commercial/retail spaces for rent.

F. Cost of Construction. All of the costs of planning, designing, developing, and constructing the Developer Improvements, including all permits and entitlements, shall be borne solely by the Developer.

G. Insurance Requirements. Developer shall take out prior to commencement of construction of the Developer Improvements, and maintain or shall cause its contractor to take out and maintain until the issuance of the Release of Construction Covenants pursuant to Section 2M of this Agreement, a comprehensive general liability policy in the amount of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) combined single limit policy, and if Developer owns automobiles, a comprehensive automobile liability policy in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000), combined single limit, or such other policy limits as City may approve at its discretion, including contractual liability, as shall protect Developer and City from claims for such damages, and which policy shall be issued by an “A-” rated insurance carrier. Such policy or policies shall be written on an occurrence form. Developer shall also furnish or cause to be furnished to City evidence satisfactory to City that the Developer and any contractor with whom it has contracted for the performance of work on The Property or otherwise pursuant to this Agreement carries workers’ compensation insurance as required by law. Developer shall furnish a certificate of insurance countersigned by an authorized agent of the insurance carrier on a form approved by City setting forth the general provisions of the insurance coverage. This countersigned certificate shall name City and its respective officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, as additionally named insured parties under the policy, and the certificate shall be accompanied by a duly executed endorsement evidencing such additional insured status. The certificate and endorsement by the insurance carrier shall contain a statement of obligation on the part of the carrier to notify City of any material change, cancellation or termination of the coverage at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of any such material change, cancellation or termination. Coverage provided hereunder by Developer shall be primary insurance and not be contributing with any insurance maintained by City, and the policy shall contain such an endorsement. The insurance policy or the endorsement shall contain a waiver of subrogation for the benefit of City. The required certificate shall be furnished by Developer at the time set forth therefore in the Schedule of Performance or, if no time is specified, prior to the commencement of construction of the Developer Improvements.

H. Developer’s Indemnity. Developer shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for, and hold the City and its officers, agents, and employees harmless from all claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability of any kind or nature for any damages to property or injuries to persons, including accidental death (including attorneys’ fees and costs), which may be caused by any acts or omissions of Developer in the performance under this Agreement, whether such activities, performance, or omissions by Developer or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted by Developer and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement. Developer shall not be liable for property damage or bodily injury occasioned by the negligence or willful misconduct of City or its agents 627
Section 10, Item F
15 or employees, a breach of this Agreement by the City, or the failure of City or its agents or employees to follow accepted safety standards in connection with accessing the Property pursuant to Section 2I, below.

I. Rights of Access. Prior to the issuance of a Release of Construction Covenants (as specified in Section 2M of this Agreement), for purposes of assuring compliance with this Agreement, including construction of the Developer Improvements, representatives of City shall have the right with advance notice of access to the Property conveyed to Developer without charges or fees, at normal construction hours during the period of construction. City representatives shall comply with all safety rules during any such inspection. City shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for, and hold the Developer and its representatives, officers, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors harmless from all claims, demands, defense costs, and liability of any kind or nature arising out of the City’s exercise of this right of access, except to the extent caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Developer or its representatives, officers, employees, agents, contractors, or subcontractors.

J. Compliance With Laws. Developer shall carry out the design, construction and operation of the Developer Improvements in conformity with all applicable laws, including all applicable state labor standards, City zoning and development standards, building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes, and all other provisions of the City Municipal Code, and all applicable accessibility requirements, including without limitation the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., California Government Code Section 4450, et seq., California Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq.

K. Nondiscrimination in Employment. For the Property and its development, Developer certifies and agrees that all persons employed or applying for employment by it, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or holding companies, and all subcontractors, bidders and vendors, will be treated equally by it without regard to, or because of any protected class under State of California or Federal law.

L. Taxes and Assessments. Developer shall pay prior to delinquency all ad valorem real estate taxes and assessments on the Property accruing after the Closing Date, subject to the Developer’s right to contest in good faith any such taxes. Developer shall remove or have removed any levy or attachment made on any portion of the Property after the Closing, or assure the satisfaction thereof within a reasonable time provided Developer reserves the right to appeal or challenge any levy or attachment. Developer shall not apply for or receive any exemption from the payment of property taxes or assessments on any interest in or to the Property or the Developer Improvements.

M. Release of Construction Covenants. Promptly after completion of the Developer Improvements in conformity with this Agreement, City shall furnish Developer with a “Release of Construction Covenants,” substantially in the form of Attachment No. 4 hereto which is incorporated herein by reference. City shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition such Release of Construction Covenants. The Release of Construction Covenants shall be a conclusive 628
Section 10, Item F
16 determination of satisfactory completion of the Developer Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Release of Construction Covenants shall so state.

If City refuses or fails to furnish the Release of Construction Covenants, after written request from Developer, City shall, within fifteen (15) days of written request therefor, provide Developer with a written statement of the reasons City refused or failed to furnish the Release of Construction Covenants. The statement shall also contain City’s opinion of the actions the Developer must take to obtain the Release of Construction Covenants. The Release of Construction Covenants shall not constitute evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any obligation of Developer to any holder of any mortgage, or any insurer of a mortgage securing money loaned to finance the Developer Improvements, or any part thereof. The Release of Construction Covenants is not a notice of completion as referred to in Section 3093 of the California Civil Code.

N. Financing of Improvements.
(1) Evidence of Financing. Prior to Closing, Developer shall submit evidence reasonably satisfactory to City of construction financing (“Construction Financing”) as follows:
(a) The obtainment of sufficient equity capital or a firm and binding commitment for construction financing necessary to undertake development of the Property and the construction of the Developer Improvements in accordance with this Agreement. (b) The Construction Financing must fund prior to Closing, or be ready to fund within thirty (30) days after Closing. If the Construction Financing fails to fund as provided herein, the City may exercise its rights under this Agreement, including without limitation its right to reenter the Property and revesting of title to the Property in accordance with Section 3E herein. (c) If City is not satisfied with the evidence of Construction Financing, City shall notify Developer within twenty (20) days of receipt of a complete submission stating the reasons for such dissatisfaction and Developer shall promptly obtain and submit to City new evidence of financing.

City shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition its approval of satisfactory Construction Financing.
(d) Evidence of obtaining Construction Financing shall include the following: (i) a copy of a legally binding, firm and enforceable loan commitment(s) obtained by Developer from one or more financial institutions for the mortgage loan or loans for financing to fund the construction, completion, operation and maintenance of the Developer Improvements, subject to such lenders’ reasonable, customary and normal conditions and terms; and/or (ii) a certification from the chief financial officer of Developer that Developer has sufficient funds for such construction, and that such funds have been committed to such construction, and/or other documentation satisfactory to City as evidence of other sources of capital sufficient to demonstrate that Developer has adequate funds to cover the difference between the total cost of the construction and completion of the Developer Improvements, less financing authorized by those loans set forth in subparagraph (a) above.
629
Section 10, Item F
17 (2) No Encumbrances Except Mortgages, Deeds of Trust, or Sale and Lease-Back for Development. Mortgages, deeds of trust and sales and leases-back shall be permitted before the completion of the Developer Improvements only with the City’s prior written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, and only for the purpose of securing loans of funds to be used for financing construction of the Developer Improvements (including architecture, engineering, legal, and related direct costs as well as indirect hard and soft costs), permanent financing, and any other purposes necessary and appropriate in connection with development under this Agreement. In no event, however, shall the amount or amounts of indebtedness secured by mortgages or deeds of trust exceed the projected cost of constructing the Developer Improvements, as evidenced by a pro forma and a construction contract which set forth such construction costs. The words “mortgage” and “trust deed” as used hereinafter shall include sale and lease-back.
(3) Holder Not Obligated to Construct Improvements. The holder of any mortgage or deed of trust authorized by this Agreement shall not be obligated by the provisions of this Agreement to construct or complete the Developer Improvements or any portion thereof, or to guarantee such construction or completion; nor shall any covenant or any other provision in this Agreement be construed so to obligate such holder. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to construe, permit or authorize any such holder to devote the Property to any uses or to construct any improvements thereon, other than those uses or improvements provided for or authorized by this Agreement.
(4) Notice of Default to Mortgagee or Deed of Trust Holders; Right to Cure. With respect to any mortgage or deed of trust granted by Developer as provided herein, whenever City may deliver any notice or demand to Developer with respect to any breach or default by Developer in completion of construction of the Developer Improvements, City shall at the same time deliver to each holder of record of any mortgage or deed of trust authorized by this Agreement a copy of such notice or demand. Each such holder shall (insofar as the rights granted by the City are concerned) have the right, at its option, within thirty (30) days after the receipt of the notice, to cure or remedy or commence to cure or remedy and thereafter to pursue with due diligence the cure or remedy of any such default and to add the cost thereof to the mortgage debt and the lien of its mortgage. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to permit or authorize such holder to undertake or continue the construction or completion of the Developer Improvements, or any portion thereof (beyond the extent necessary to conserve or protect the improvements or construction already made) without first having expressly assumed Developer’s obligations to City by written agreement reasonably satisfactory to City. The holder, in that event, must agree to complete, in the manner provided in this Agreement, the improvements to which the lien or title of such holder relates. Any such holder properly completing such improvement shall be entitled, upon compliance with the requirements of Section 2M of this Agreement, to a Release of Construction Covenants. It is understood that a holder shall be deemed to have satisfied the thirty (30) day time limit set forth above for commencing to cure or remedy a Developer default which requires title and/or possession of the Property which shall have been conveyed to Developer if and to the extent any such holder has within such thirty (30) day period commenced proceedings to obtain title and/or possession and thereafter the holder diligently pursues such proceedings to completion and cures or remedies the default.
630
Section 10, Item F
18 (5) Failure of Holder to Complete Developer Improvements. In any case where, thirty (30) days after the holder of any mortgage or deed of trust creating a lien or encumbrance upon the Property receives a notice from City of a default by Developer in completion of construction of any of the Developer Improvements under this Agreement, and such holder has not exercised the option to construct as set forth in this Section 2N, or if it has exercised the option but has defaulted hereunder and failed to timely cure such default, City may purchase the mortgage or deed of trust by payment to the holder of the amount of the Purchase Price received by City at the time of Developer’s default, and such payment by City shall be City’s only obligation to be entitled to any necessary reconveyance of the Property and reconveyance of the mortgage or deed of trust securing the Developer Improvements. Holder’s recourse for any remaining principal and interest and all other sums secured by the mortgage or deed of trust shall be against Developer and Developer collateral and not against City or the Property. Nothing herein shall impact holder’s rights to proceeds as authorized in Section 3E(2)(b) from a subsequent resale of the Property by City. If the ownership of the Property has vested in the holder, City, if it so desires, shall be entitled to a conveyance from the holder to City of the Property, as applicable, upon payment to the holder of an amount equal to the sum of the following:
(a) The unpaid mortgage or deed of trust debt at the time title became vested in the holder (less all appropriate credits, including those resulting from collection and application of rentals and other income received during foreclosure proceedings); (b) All expenses with respect to foreclosure including reasonable attorneys’ fees; (c) The costs of any improvements made by such holder;
(d) An amount equivalent to the interest that would have accrued on the aggregate of such amounts had all such amounts become part of the mortgage or deed of trust debt and such debt had continued in existence to the date of payment by City. (6) Right of the City to Cure Mortgage or Deed of Trust Default. In the event of a mortgage or deed of trust default or breach by Developer prior to the completion of the construction of any of the Developer Improvements or any part thereof, Developer shall promptly deliver to City a copy of any mortgage holder’s notice of default. If the holder of any mortgage or deed of trust has not exercised its option to construct, City shall have the right but no obligation to cure the default. In such event, City shall be entitled to reimbursement from Developer of all proper costs and expenses incurred by City in curing such default. City shall also be entitled to a lien upon the Property to the extent of such costs and disbursements. Any such lien shall be junior and subordinate to the mortgages or deeds of trust pursuant to this Section 2N. 631
Section 10, Item F
19 3. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES
A. Default Remedies. Subject to the extensions of time set forth in Section 4B of this Agreement, failure by either party to perform any action or covenant required by this Agreement within the time periods provided herein following notice and failure to cure as described hereafter, constitutes a “Default” under this Agreement. A party claiming a Default shall give written Notice of Default to the other party specifying the Default complained of. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the claimant shall not institute any proceeding against any other party, and the other party shall not be in Default if such party within thirty (30) days from receipt of such Notice and with due diligence commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy with diligence.

B. Institution of Legal Actions. In addition to any other rights or remedies and subject to the restrictions otherwise set forth in this Agreement, either party may institute an action at law or equity to seek specific performance of the terms of this Agreement, or to cure, correct or remedy any uncured Default, to recover damages for any uncured Default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Fresno, State of California, or in the District of the United States District Court in which such county is located.

C. Termination by the Developer Prior to Conveyance of the Property. In the event that prior to the conveyance of the Property Developer is not in default under this Agreement and:
(1) City does not tender title pursuant to the Grant Deed in the manner and condition and by the date provided in this Agreement; or (2) one or more of the Developer Conditions of Closing is not fulfilled on or before the time set forth in the Schedule of Performance and such failure is not caused by Developer; or (3) any default of City prior to Closing is not cured within the time set forth in Section 3A hereof, after written demand by Developer; then this Agreement may, at the option of Developer in its sole discretion, be terminated by written Notice thereof to City. From the date of the Notice of termination of this Agreement by Developer to City and thereafter this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and there shall be no further rights or obligations between the parties with respect to the Property by virtue of or with respect to this Agreement. Under these circumstances, Developer shall be entitled to a return of the Developer Deposit.

D. Termination by City Prior to Conveyance of the Property. In the event that prior to conveyance of the Property City is not in Default under this Agreement and: (1) Developer (or any successor in interest) assigns or attempts to assign the Agreement or any rights therein or in the Property in violation of this Agreement; or (2) one or more of the City Conditions of Closing is not fulfilled on or before the time set forth in the Schedule of Performance and such failure is not caused by City; or (3) Developer is otherwise in default of this Agreement and fails to cure such default within the time set forth in Section 3A hereof; then this Agreement and any rights of Developer or any assignee or transferee with respect to or arising out of the Agreement or the Property, shall, at the option of City, be terminated by City by written Notice thereof to Developer.

From the date of the Notice of termination of this Agreement by City to Developer and thereafter this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and there shall be no further rights or obligations between the parties. Under these circumstances, City shall be entitled to keep the Developer Deposit plus any accrued interest.
632
Section 10, Item F
20 E. Reentry and Revesting of Title in the City for Failure to Timely Commence and Complete Developer Improvements, Begin Operation of Conforming Business Activities, or for an Unlawful Transfer.
(1) After Closing and Prior to Completion of the Developer Improvements or Opening of Conforming Business Activities. City has the right, at its election, and subject to notice and cure (e.g. thirty days to commence such cure after written notice), to reenter and take possession of the Property transferred to Developer by Grant Deed pursuant to this Agreement, with all improvements thereon, and terminate and revest in City the estate conveyed to Developer if after the Closing Developer (or its successors in interest) shall:
(a) Fail to obtain Construction Financing within the time required in this Agreement or fail to provide evidence satisfactory to City of Construction Financing within the time required in this Agreement.
(b) Fail to start construction of the Developer Improvements as required by this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from City; or (c) Abandon or substantially suspend construction of the Developer Improvements required by this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from the City, unless such abandonment or suspension is not caused by Developer’s acts or omissions or as provided for in Section 4B; or
(d) Fail to complete the Developer Improvements within the time limits set forth in the Schedule of Performance; or
(e) Fail to perform Conforming Business Activities within the time limits set forth in the Schedule of Performance; or
(f) Contrary to the provisions of Section 4C, unconsented Transfer or suffer any involuntary and unconsented Transfer in violation of this Agreement. (2) Conditions of Reentry and Revesting Rights. City’s right to reenter, terminate and revest shall be subject to and be limited by and shall not defeat, render invalid or limit:
(a) Any mortgage or deed of trust permitted by this Agreement; or (b) Any rights or interests provided in this Agreement for the protection of the holders of such mortgages or deeds of trust.

City shall not unreasonably refuse any request to subordinate its right of reentry to a Cityapproved construction lender’s mortgage or deed of trust securing a loan of funds for financing construction of the Developer Improvements.

The parties agree to execute a Declaration of Construction Covenants, in substantially the form set forth in Attachment No. 6, which shall contain appropriate reference and 633
Section 10, Item F
21 provision to give effect to City’s rights as set forth in this Section 3E, to reenter and take possession of the Property, with all improvements thereon, and to terminate and revest in City the estate conveyed to Developer. Upon the revesting in City of title to the Property transferred to Developer by Grant Deed as provided in this Section 3E, City shall have the sole and absolute discretion with respect to the Property, including without limitation retaining the Property for City or other public use, or disposing of the Property in its sole and absolute discretion. If City decides to sell the Property City will use reasonable efforts to resell the Property as soon and in such manner as the City may find feasible to a qualified and responsible party or parties (as determined by City) who will assume the obligation of making or completing the Developer Improvements, or such improvements in their stead as shall be satisfactory to City and in accordance with the uses specified for the Property. Upon such resale of the Property, the net proceeds thereof after repayment of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, which is permitted by this Agreement, may be applied:
(c) First, to reimburse City, on its own behalf or on behalf of City, all costs and expenses incurred by City, including, but not limited to, reasonable City staff costs and any expenditures by City in connection with the recapture, management and resale of the Property or any part thereof (but less any income derived by City from the Property or any part thereof in connection with such management); all taxes, assessments and water or sewer charges with respect to the Property or any part thereof which Developer has not paid (or, in the event that Property is exempt from taxation or assessment of such charges during the period of ownership thereof by City, an amount, if paid, equal to such taxes, assessments, or charges as would have been payable if the Property were not so exempt); any payments made or necessary to be made to discharge any encumbrances or liens existing on the Property or part thereof at the time or revesting of title thereto in City, or to discharge or prevent from attaching or being made any subsequent encumbrances or liens due to obligations, defaults or acts of Developer, its successors or transferees; any expenditures made or obligations incurred with respect to the making or completion of the Improvements or any part thereof on the Property; and any amounts otherwise owing City; and in the event additional proceeds are thereafter available, then (d) Second, to reimburse Developer, its successor or transferee, up to the amount equal to the sum of the costs incurred for the acquisition and development of the Property transferred to Developer by Grant Deed and for the Developer Improvements existing on such the Property at the time of the reentry and possession, less any gains or income withdrawn or made by Developer from the Property transferred to Developer by Grant Deed or the Developer Improvements thereon.

Any balance remaining after such reimbursements shall be retained by City as its property.

The rights established in this Section 3E are not intended to be exclusive of any other right, power or remedy, but each and every such right, power, and remedy shall be cumulative and concurrent and shall be in addition to any other right, power and remedy authorized herein or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. These rights are to be interpreted in light of the fact that City will have conveyed the Property to the Developer for redevelopment purposes, particularly for development and operation of various commercial facilities, and not for speculation. 634
Section 10, Item F
22 (3) Perfecting Reversionary Interest. City may perfect its revisionary interest by recording a Notice of Reversionary Interest in substantially the form set forth in Attachment No.

5. F. Option to Purchase Property After Completion of Developer Improvements and Operation of Conforming Business Activities. If Developer or its occupants’ Business Activities on the Property do not materially conform with Section 2E(2) for a substantial portion of the Property and Developer fails to conform after sixty (60) days’ notice from the City, City shall have the “Option” to purchase the Property, and all improvements thereon. (1) Exercise of Option. City may exercise this Option by delivering written notice of the exercise (“Exercise Notice”) to Developer before the expiration of the ten (10) year Conforming Business Activity provision (“Option Term”). Upon exercise of the Option, the price to acquire the Property shall be the “Fair Market Value” of the Property (“Acquisition Cost”). (a) “Fair Market Value” of the Property shall be established by an MAI appraiser. City and Developer shall each select an MAI appraiser to prepare an appraisal at their own cost. The Fair Market Value for purposes of this section shall be the average of the two appraisals. Developer may forego obtaining an appraisal, in which case the Fair Market Value shall be established by City’s appraisal.
(b) Developer’s costs to construct the Developer Improvements shall be established by written receipts, and Developer shall be solely responsible for furnishing appropriate documentation to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. (c) The principal balance of any mortgage, deed of trust, security instrument, or similar lien remaining on the Property at the Close of Escrow shall be deducted from the Acquisition Cost. (d) City and Developer may agree to an alternative method of determining the Acquisition Cost, or any portion thereof.
(2) Execution of Purchase Agreement. After receipt of the Exercise Notice for purchase of the Property, Developer and City shall promptly prepare and execute a purchase and sale agreement (“Purchase Agreement”). The Purchase Agreement shall be on a customary commercial form used where public agencies acquire property, or otherwise in a form acceptable to Developer and City. City and Developer shall open escrow for the Property acquisition within thirty (30) days of the Exercise Notice.

G. Right of First Refusal. For a period of Fifty (50) years from the Effective Date of this Agreement, City shall have a “Right of First Refusal” to acquire the Property, including any improvements located thereon, at a Fair Market Value as described in Section 3F(1)(a).

This Right of First Refusal shall apply to a proposed purchase only. (1) Notification to City. Upon Developer’s receipt of a bona fide offer to purchase ("Offer") from a party who is not affiliated with Developer ("Third Party"), which Offer Developer 635
Section 10, Item F
23 is willing to accept, Developer shall give notice to City ("Notice") that Developer intends to accept the Offer, and concurrently therewith provide City with a copy of the Offer. (2) Election of Right of First Refusal. If City elects to exercise its Right of First Refusal, it shall do so by delivering to Developer written notice of its election (“Election”) to purchase or lease the Property on terms and conditions substantially the same (identical as to purchase price or lease price) set forth in the Offer, within sixty (60) days after the receipt of the Notice.

If City does not so notify Developer within said sixty (60) days, City shall be deemed to have rejected the Offer and Developer may proceed to sell or lease the Property (free and clear of this Right of First Refusal) to the Third Party on the terms and conditions set forth in the Offer, or on terms which are better for Developer, but not worse for Developer. (3) Execution of Purchase Agreement. If City elects to exercises its Right of First Refusal, Developer and City shall promptly prepare and execute a purchase and sale or lease agreement (“Purchase Agreement”). The Purchase Agreement shall be on a customary commercial form used where public agencies acquire property, or otherwise in a form acceptable to Developer and City. City and Developer shall open escrow for the Property acquisition within thirty (30) days of the Election.
(4) Continuation of Right of First Refusal. Upon the consummation of such purchase and sale or lease to the Third Party, this Right of First Refusal shall automatically and without further notice terminate. If, however, Developer does not consummate a sale or lease to the Third Party as aforesaid, this Right of First Refusal shall not terminate, but shall be revived and continue for the then remaining balance of term of this Right of First Refusal.

4. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice (“Notice”) which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by any commercially acceptable means to the party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the party as set forth below, or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.

To City: City Manager
City of Fowler
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
To Developer: Mailbox Money LLC
PO Box 1095
Clovis, CA 93613
ATTN: Udeyvir Virk
Any written notice, demand or communication shall be deemed received: immediately if delivered by hand; 24 hours after delivery to a receipted, overnight delivery service; 24 hours 636
Section 10, Item F
24 after delivery be e-mail with an acknowledgement of receipt by the intended recipient; and on the fourth (4th) day from the date it is postmarked if delivered by registered or certified mail.

B. Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays or defaults are due to: war; insurrection; pandemic; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation; acts or omissions of the other party; governmental delays, or acts or failures to act of City or any other public or governmental agency or entity (other than the acts or failures to act of City which shall not excuse performance by City, but where any unreasonable delay by City on an action required by this Agreement shall toll the timeframes for an amount of time equal to such unreasonable delays). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if Notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and Developer. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the lack of funding to complete the Developer Improvements shall not constitute grounds of enforced delay pursuant to this Section 4B.

C. Transfers of Interest in Property or Agreement.
(1) Prohibition. The qualifications and identity of Developer, as well as Developer’s proposal, are of particular concern to City. Therefore, for the period commencing upon the date of this Agreement and until furnishing of the Release of Construction Covenants: (a) no voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of Developer shall acquire any rights under this Agreement; (b) nor shall Developer make any total or partial sale, transfer, conveyance, or assignment, of the whole or any part of the Property or the Developer Improvements thereon; collectively referred to herein as a “Transfer,” without the prior written approval of the City, except as expressly set forth herein.
(2) Permitted Transfers. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City approval of a Transfer shall not be required in connection with any of the following:
(a) Any Transfer to an entity or entities in which Developer retains a minimum of fifty-one percent (51%) of the ownership or beneficial interest and retains management and control of the transferee entity or entities.
(b) Any requested assignment for financing purposes (subject to such financing being considered and approved by City pursuant to Section 2N herein), including the grant of a deed of trust to secure the funds necessary for land acquisition, construction and permanent financing of the Developer Improvements.

In the event of a Transfer by Developer under subparagraph (a) above not requiring the City’s prior approval, Developer nevertheless agrees that at least thirty (30) days prior to such Transfer it shall give written notice to City of such assignment and satisfactory evidence that the 637
Section 10, Item F
25 assignee has assumed in writing, through an assignment and assumption agreement in a form satisfactory to City’s legal counsel, all of the obligations of this Agreement. Such assignment shall not, however, release the assigning Developer from any obligations to City hereunder. (3) City Consideration of Requested Transfer. City agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold approval of a request for approval of a Transfer made pursuant to this Section 4C, provided Developer delivers written Notice to City requesting such approval. Such Notice shall be accompanied by evidence regarding the proposed transferee’s development and/or operational qualifications and experience, and its financial commitments and resources, in sufficient detail to enable City to evaluate the proposed assignee or purchaser pursuant to the criteria set forth in this Section 4C and as reasonably determined by City. City may, in considering any such request, take into consideration such factors as: (a) the quality of any new and/or replacement operator; (b) the sales tax revenues projected to be received from the Property; (c) the transferee’s past performance as developer and operator of commercial facilities; (d) the current financial condition of the transferee, and similar factors. City’s approval shall be by the City Council. City agrees not to unreasonably withhold its approval of any such requested Transfer, taking into consideration the foregoing factors.

An assignment and assumption agreement in form satisfactory to City’s legal counsel shall also be required for all proposed Transfers requiring City approval. Within thirty (30) days after the receipt of Developer’s written Notice requesting City approval of a Transfer pursuant to this Section 4C, City shall either approve or disapprove such proposed assignment or shall respond in writing by stating what further information, if any, City reasonably requires in order to determine the request complete and determine whether or not to grant the requested approval. Upon receipt of such a response, Developer shall promptly furnish to City such further information as may be reasonably requested.

D. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon Developer and its permitted successors and assigns.

Whenever the term “Developer” is used in this Agreement, such term shall include any other permitted successors and assigns as herein provided.

E. Assignment by City. The City may assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement with the approval of Developer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

F. Relationship Between City and Developer. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and Developer is not that of a partnership or joint venture and that City and Developer shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other.

Except as expressly provided herein or in the Attachments hereto, City shall not have any rights, powers, duties or obligations with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Developer Improvements.

G. No Third-Party Beneficiaries Excepting City. Excepting only City, which shall be deemed to be a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement, there shall be no third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement.
638
Section 10, Item F
26 H. City Approvals and Actions. City shall maintain authority over this Agreement and the authority to implement this Agreement through the City Manager. The City Manager shall have the authority to make approvals, issue interpretations, waive provisions, and/or enter into certain amendments of this Agreement on behalf of City so long as such actions do not materially or substantially change the uses or development permitted on the Property, and such approvals, interpretations, waivers and/or amendments may include extensions of time to perform as specified in the Schedule of Performance. All other material and/or substantive interpretations, waivers, or amendments shall require the consideration, action and written consent of the City Council.

I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts which, when signed by all parties, shall constitute a binding agreement. This Agreement shall be executed in two (2) originals, each of which is deemed to be an original.

J. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, notwithstanding any previous negotiations or agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged in this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. This Agreement includes Attachment Nos. 1 through 5, which are incorporated herein.

K. Real Estate Brokerage Commission. City and Developer each represent and warrant to the other that no broker or finder is entitled to any commission or finder’s fee in connection with Developer’s acquisition of the Property from the City. The parties agree to defend and hold harmless the other party from any claim to any such commission or fee from any other broker, agent or finder with respect to this Agreement which is payable by such party.

L. Interpretation. As used in this Agreement, the word “including” shall be construed as if followed by the words “without limitation.” This Agreement has been prepared with input from both parties, and shall be interpreted as though prepared jointly by both parties.

M. No Waiver. Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.

Nor shall a waiver by either party of a breach of any of the covenants, conditions or agreements under this Agreement to be performed by the other party shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions or conditions of this Agreement.

N. Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each party.
639
Section 10, Item F
27 O. Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

P. Legal Advice. Each party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Agreement, and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement, or have knowingly chosen not to consult legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other party, or their respective agents, employees, or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, and without duress or coercion, whether economic or otherwise.

Q. Cooperation. Each party agrees to cooperate with the other in this transaction and, in that regard, to sign any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement including, but not limited to, releases or additional agreements.

R. Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

S. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.

T. Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of the City. No member, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Developer, or any successor in interest, in the event of any Default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Developer or its successors, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

U. Attorneys’ Fees. In any action between the parties to interpret, enforce, reform, modify, rescind, or otherwise in connection with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in the action shall be entitled, in addition to damages, injunctive relief, or any other relief to which it might be entitled, reasonable costs and expenses including, without limitation, litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

V. Precedence of Documents. If there is any conflict between this Agreement and any supplemental escrow instructions, the order of precedence for resolving conflicts shall be as follows: first this Agreement, second the supplemental escrow instructions. 640
Section 10, Item F
28 Signatures on Next Page
641
Section 10, Item F
29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Disposition and Development Agreement as of the date set forth above.

MAILBOX MONEY LLC
__________________________ Date: ______________________ Udeyvir Virk
Manager

CITY OF FOWLER
__________________________ Date: ______________________ Michael Reid
City Manager
ATTEST:
_____________________________ Date: ______________________ Angela Vasquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

LOZANO SMITH
_________________________ Date: ______________________
Scott G. Cross
City Attorney
642
Section 10, Item F
30 ATTACHMENT NO. 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
343-233-02ST AND 343‐233‐03ST

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 2 AND 3 OF BLOCK 233 IN BOOK 4, PAGE 15 OF THE TOWN OF FOWLER, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.
643
Section 10, Item F
31 ATTACHMENT NO. 2

FORM OF GRANT DEED
Recorded By and For the Benefit of,
And When Recorded Return to:

Mailbox Money LLC
PO Box 1095
Clovis, CA 93613
ATTN: Udevir Virk

GRANT DEED
For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Fowler, a California municipal corporation (“City”), hereby grants to Mailbox Money LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), the real property hereinafter referred to as the “Property,” described in Exhibit A2 attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Property is conveyed in accordance with and subject to a Disposition and Development Agreement entered into between City and Developer dated December 2, 2025 (“DDA”), a copy of which is on file with City at its offices as a public record and which is incorporated herein by reference.
~ Signatures on Next Page ~
644
Section 10, Item F
32 MAILBOX MONEY LLC
__________________________ Date: _____________________
Udeyvir Virk
Manager

CITY OF FOWLER
__________________________ Date: _____________________
Michael Reid
City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________ Date: _____________________ Angela Vazquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

LOZANO SMITH
__________________________ Date: _____________________
Scott G. Cross
City Attorney
645
Section 10, Item F
33 Exhibit A2

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
343-233-02ST AND 343‐233‐03ST

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 2AND 3 OF BLOCK 233 IN BOOK 4, PAGE 15 OF THE TOWN OF FOWLER, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.
646
Section 10, Item F
34 ATTACHMENT NO. 3

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
All Developer deadlines are subject to force majeure events.

1. Execution of Agreement by City.

The City shall execute this Agreement if
approved by City Council.

Within five (5) days after City Council
approval, the City shall deliver two (2)
executed copies of this Agreement to the
Developer who shall execute and return to the
City within five (5) days.

2. Opening of Escrow.

City shall open Escrow with Escrow Agent.

Within ten (10) days after City’s receipt of
fully executed Agreement.

3. Evidence of the Obtainment of
Construction Financing.

Developer submits evidence of Construction
Financing as required by Section 2N.

Prior to Closing.

4. Submission of Development Plans.

Developer submits Design Drawings, Site
Plan, and Construction Plans to City’s
Community Development Director.

Within one hundred and fifty (150) days of
Land Use Approvals.

5. City Approval or Disapproval of
Development Plans.

City’s Community Development Director
shall review the Design Drawings, Site Plan,
and Construction Plans, and approve or
disapprove same.

Within sixty (60) days after submittal.

6. Revisions to Development Plans.

Developer shall prepare revised Development
Plans and resubmit them to the Community
Development Director for review.

Within thirty (30) days after receipt of City
comments.
647
Section 10, Item F
35 7. Final Review of Development Plans.

The Community Development Director shall
approve or disapprove the revisions submitted
by Developer provided that the revisions
necessary to accommodate the Director’s
comments have been made.

Within thirty (30) days after submittal by the
Developer.

8. Land Use Approvals.

Developer shall obtain any required
discretionary land use entitlements for the
Developer Improvements as required by
Section 2D.

Land use entitlement submittal shall occur not
later than one hundred and twenty (120) from
the effective date of this Agreement and must
be fully approved by the City prior to Close of
Escrow.

9. Conditions of Closing.

Developer and City shall satisfy all their
respective Conditions of Closing.

Not later than nine months from the date of
this Agreement.

10. Close of Escrow for Conveyance of the
Property.

City shall convey the Property to Developer.

Not later than one year from the date of this
Agreement.

11. Construction Permits.

Developer shall obtain all construction and
any other building permits (“Building
Permits”) necessary to commence
construction of the Developer Improvements
as set forth in Section 2D.

Not later than thirty (30) days after Closing.

12. Insurance Certificate.

Developer shall provide proof of insurance as
required by Section 2G.

Prior to the commencement of construction.

13. Commencement of Construction.

Developer shall commence construction of the
Developer Improvements.

Within sixty (60) days after issuance of the
first building permit.
648
Section 10, Item F
36 14. Completion of Construction.

Developer shall complete construction of the
Developer Improvements.

Within sixteen (16) months after issuance of
all building permits.

15. Opening of Developer Improvements
for Business.
“Conforming Business Activities” shall
commence.

Within thirty (30) days after issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.

17. Right of First Refusal.

City shall have a Right of First Refusal to
acquire the Property as set forth in Section 3G.

For a period of fifty (50) years from Effective
Date of Agreement.

18. Release of Construction Covenants.

City shall record the Release of Construction
Covenants as set forth in Section 2M and
Attachment No. 4.

In accordance with the DDA.
649
Section 10, Item F
37 ATTACHMENT NO. 4

RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION COVENANTS
Recorded By and For the Benefit of,
And When Recorded Return to:

Mailbox Money LLC
PO Box 1095
Clovis, CA 93613
ATTN: Udeyvir Virk

RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION COVENANTS
THIS RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION COVENANTS (“Release”) is made by the City of Fowler, a California municipal corporation (“City”), in favor of Mailbox Money LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), as of the date set forth below.

RECITALS
A. City and Developer have entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated December 2, 2025 (“DDA”) concerning the development of certain real property situated in the City of Fowler, California as more fully described in Exhibit A4 attached hereto and made a part hereof.

B. As referenced in Section 2M of the DDA, City is required to furnish Developer or its successors with a Release of Construction Covenants upon completion of construction of the Developer Improvements, which Release is required to be in such form as to permit it to be recorded in the Recorder’s office of Fresno County. This Release is conclusive determination of satisfactory completion of the construction and development required by the DDA for the Developer Improvements.

C. City has conclusively determined that such construction and development of the Developer Improvements has been satisfactorily completed.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City hereby certifies as follows:

1. The Developer Improvements to be constructed by Developer have been fully and satisfactorily completed in conformance with the DDA. Any operating requirements and all use, maintenance or nondiscrimination covenants contained in the DDA and other documents executed and recorded pursuant to the DDA shall remain in effect and enforceable according to their terms.

2. Nothing contained in this Release shall modify in any other way any other provisions of the DDA.
650
Section 10, Item F
38 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has executed this Release this __ day of __________ 2025.

CITY OF FOWLER, a California municipal corporation
By: _________________________________________
Michael Reid
City Manager
MAILBOX MONEY LLC, a California limited liability
Company
By: __________________________
Udeyvir Virk
Manager
651
Section 10, Item F
39 Exhibit A4

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
343-233-02ST AND 343‐233‐03ST

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 2 AND 3 OF BLOCK 233 IN BOOK 4, PAGE 15 OF THE TOWN OF FOWLER, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.
652
Section 10, Item F
40 ATTACHMENT NO. 5

NOTICE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST
Recorded By and For the Benefit of,
And When Recorded Return to:

CITY OF FOWLER
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
ATTN: City Clerk

NOTICE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST
APN 343-233-02ST AND APN 343‐233‐03ST

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Fowler, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and Mailbox Money LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated December 2, 2025 (“DDA”) concerning the development of certain real property situated in the City of Fowler, County of Fresno, State of California (“Property”) as more fully described in Exhibit A5 attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the DDA, Developer failed to complete certain Improvements by specified dates or otherwise failed to timely cure a breach of the DDA, and therefore Title to the Property has reverted back to City subject to the terms and conditions of the DDA.

NOW, THEREFORE, City does hereby give notice that Title has reverted to City for the Property and City intends to exercise all rights to the Property in accordance with the DDA.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has duly executed this instrument this __ day of __________, 2025.

CITY OF FOWLER
By: ____________________________________
Michael Reid
City Manager
653
Section 10, Item F
41 Exhibit A5

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
343-233-02ST AND 343‐233‐03ST

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 2 AND 3 OF BLOCK 233 IN BOOK 4, PAGE 15 OF THE TOWN OF FOWLER, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.
654
Section 10, Item F
42 ATTACHMENT NO. 6

DECLARATION OF CONSTRUCTION COVENANTS
Recorded By and For the Benefit of,
And When Recorded Return to:

CITY OF FOWLER
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
ATTN: City Clerk

DECLARATION OF CONSTRUCTION COVENANTS
APN 343-233-02ST AND APN 343‐233‐03ST
This Declaration of Construction Covenants (“Declaration”) is entered into on December 2, 2025 (“Effective Date”), between the City of Fowler, a California municipal corporation and general law city (“City”) and Mailbox Money LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Declarants” and individually as a “Declarant”, with respect to the following Recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement:

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the Declarants entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated December 2, 2025 (“DDA”) concerning the development of certain real property situated in the City of Fowler, County of Fresno, State of California (“Property”) as more fully described in Exhibit A6 attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(A) of the DDA, Developer is required to complete construction of certain improvements and/or other permissible uses by specified dates as outlined in Attachment 3 of the DDA; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Declarants to impose on the Property certain covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth herein.

DECLARATION:

1. Developer’s Obligation to Construct Improvements. Developer shall complete construction a mixed-use multifamily development with at least 2,400 square feet of commercial/retail shell space, and/or other permissible uses (“Developer Improvements” or “Improvements”) and any other requirements as set forth in the DDA. All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as those used in the DDA.
655
Section 10, Item F
43 2. Permitted Uses. Developer covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, its assigns, and every successor in interest to the Property or any part thereof, that upon the date of this Declaration and during construction through completion of development and thereafter, Developer shall devote the Property to the uses specified in this Declaration for the periods of time specified therein. All uses conducted on the Property, including, without limitation, all activities undertaken by Developer pursuant to the DDA, shall conform to the DDA and all applicable provisions of the City of Fowler Municipal Code. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land.

3. Restrictions on Transfer and Encumbrances. Developer further agrees as follows:

A. For the period commencing upon the date of this Declaration and until the furnishing of the Release of Construction Covenants for the Developer Improvements, no voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of Developer shall acquire any rights or powers under the DDA or this Declaration, nor shall Developer make any total or partial sale, transfer, conveyance, assignment, subdivision, refinancing or lease of the whole or any part of the Property or the Developer Improvements thereon, nor shall Developer make any total or partial sale, transfer, conveyance, assignment, subdivision, refinancing or lease of the facilities being operated upon the Property, without the prior written approval of the City pursuant to Section 4C of the DDA.

B. Except as approved in writing by City, Developer shall not place or suffer to be placed on the Property any lien or encumbrance, including but not limited to, mortgages, deeds of trust, or any other form of conveyance required for financing of the construction of the Developer Improvements on the Property and any other expenditures necessary and appropriate to develop the Property pursuant to the DDA, except as provided in Section 2N of the DDA.

C. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Declaration shall be binding upon Developer and the permitted successors and assigns of the Developer. Whenever the term “Developer” is used in this Declaration, such term shall include any other successors and assigns as herein provided.

4. Nondiscrimination. Developer herein covenants by and for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any protected class under California State or federal law in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall Developer itself or any person claiming under or through Developer, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land.

5. City Right of Reentry. City has the right, at its election, to reenter and take possession and title of the Property, with all improvements thereon, and terminate and revest in City the estate conveyed to Developer if after the close of escrow Developer (or its successors in interest) shall:
656
Section 10, Item F
44 A. Fail to start the construction of the Developer Improvements as required by the DDA for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from City; or B. Abandon or substantially suspend construction of the Developer Improvements required by the DDA for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from the City, unless such abandonment or suspension is not caused by Developer’s acts or omissions or as provided for in Section 4B of the DDA; or
C. Fail to complete the Developer Improvements within the time limits set forth in the DDA; or
D. Fail to perform Conforming Business Activities within the time limits set forth in the DDA; or
E. Contrary to the provisions of Section 4C of the DDA, Transfer or suffer any involuntary Transfer in violation of the DDA.

The City’s right to reenter, terminate and revest shall be subject to and be limited by and shall not defeat, render invalid or limit:
(1) Any mortgage or deed of trust permitted by the DDA; or (2) Any rights or interests provided in the DDA for the protection of the holders of such mortgages or deeds of trust.

6. Title Revesting to the City. Upon the revesting title to the Property to the City as provided in this Section, City shall use its reasonable efforts to resell the Property as soon and in such manner as City shall find feasible to a qualified and responsible party or parties (as determined by City) who will assume the obligation of making or completing the Developer Improvements, or such improvements in their stead as shall be satisfactory to City and in accordance with the uses specified for the Property. Upon such resale of the Property, the net proceeds thereof after repayment of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, which is permitted by this Agreement, shall be applied:

A. First, to reimburse City, on its own behalf or on behalf of City, all costs and expenses incurred by City, excluding City staff costs, but specifically, including, but not limited to, any expenditures by the City in connection with the recapture, management and resale of the Property or part thereof (but less any income derived by City from the Property or part thereof in connection with such management); all taxes, assessments and water or sewer charges with respect to the Property or part thereof which Developer has not paid (or, in the event that the Property is exempt from taxation or assessment of such charges during the period of ownership 657
Section 10, Item F
45 thereof by City, an amount, if paid, equal to such taxes, assessments, or charges as would have been payable if the Property were not so exempt); any payments made or necessary to be made to discharge any encumbrances or liens existing on the Property or part thereof at the time or revesting of title thereto in City, or to discharge or prevent from attaching or being made any subsequent encumbrances or liens due to obligations, defaults or acts of Developer, its successors or transferees; any expenditures made or obligations incurred with respect to the making or completion of the Improvements or any part thereof on the Property; and any amounts otherwise owing City; and in the event additional proceeds are thereafter available, then B. Second, to reimburse Developer, its successor or transferee, up to the amount equal to the sum of the costs incurred for the acquisition and development of the Property and for the Developer Improvements existing on the Property at the time of the reentry and possession, less any gains or income withdrawn or made by Developer from the Property or the Developer Improvements thereon.

C. Any balance remaining after such reimbursements shall be retained by City as its property. The rights established in this Section are not intended to be exclusive of any other right, power or remedy, but each and every such right, power, and remedy shall be cumulative and concurrent and shall be in addition to any other right, power and remedy authorized herein or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. These rights are to be interpreted in light of the fact that City will have conveyed the Property to Developer for redevelopment purposes, particularly for development and operation of commercial uses, and not for speculation.

7. Violations Do Not Impair Liens. No violation or breach of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, provisions or limitations contained in this Declaration shall defeat or render invalid or in any way impair the lien or charge of any mortgage or deed of trust or security interest permitted by Section 3 of this Declaration; provided, however, that any subsequent owner of the Property shall be bound by such remaining covenants, conditions, restrictions, limitations and provisions, whether such owner’s title was acquired by foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, trustee’s sale or otherwise.

8. Covenants Run with the Land. All covenants contained in this Declaration shall be covenants running with the land. All of Developer’s obligations hereunder, except as provided hereunder, shall terminate and shall become null and void upon completion of the Developer Improvements and the performance of Conforming Business Activities. Every covenant contained in this Declaration against discrimination contained in Section 4 of this Declaration shall remain in effect in perpetuity.

9. Covenants for the Benefit of City. All covenants without regard to technical classification or designation shall be binding for the benefit of City, and such covenants shall run in favor of City for the entire period during which such covenants shall be in force and effect, without regard to whether City is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. City, in the event of any breach of any such covenants, shall have the right to exercise all the rights and remedies and to maintain any actions at law or suits in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breach. 658
Section 10, Item F
46 10. Revisions to the Declaration. Both City, its successors and assigns, and Developer and the successors and assigns of Developer in and to all or any part of the fee title to the Property, shall have the right with the mutual consent of City and Developer to consent and agree to changes in, or to eliminate in whole or in part, any of the covenants, easements or restrictions contained in this Declaration without the consent of any tenant, lessee, easement holder, licensee, mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other person or entity having any interest less than a fee in the Property. However, Developer and City are obligated to give written notice to and obtain the consent of any first mortgagee prior to consent or agreement between the parties concerning such changes to this Declaration. The covenants contained in this Declaration, without regard to technical classification, shall not benefit or be enforceable by any third party that is not a party to the DDA.
~ Signatures on Next Page ~
659
Section 10, Item F
47 MAILBOX MONEY LLC
__________________________ Date: _____________________
Udeyvir Virk
Manager

LOZANO SMITH
__________________________ Date: _____________________
Scott G. Cross
City Attorney
660
Section 10, Item F
48 Exhibit A6

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
343-233-02ST AND 343‐233‐03ST

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF FOWLER, COUNTY OF FRESNO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 2 AND 3 OF BLOCK 233 IN BOOK 4, PAGE 15 OF THE TOWN OF FOWLER, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.
661
Section 10, Item F

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 2, 2025
FROM: ERIC M. ROCHA, Public Works & Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: APPROVE an Agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group for Preparation of the City of Fowler Water Master Plan in the amount of $209,400.00 and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the Agreement.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action will result in the development of a comprehensive Water Master Plan that evaluates current system conditions, analyzes long-term water supply and infrastructure needs, and supports the City’s regulatory compliance and growth planning efforts. The City’s existing water planning documents are outdated and do not reflect recent improvements, SGMA requirements, or projected development demands. Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, who have extensive experience with Fowler’s water system and related projects, submitted a detailed proposal to complete the Water Master Plan for a lump-sum cost of $209,400. Their scope includes hydraulic modeling, demand and supply forecasting, system deficiency identification, and preparation of a phased Capital Improvement Plan. Approval of this agreement will provide the City with a modern, data-driven roadmap for infrastructure investment, enhance development readiness, and strengthen the City’s ability to secure future funding.

BACKGROUND
The City of Fowler operates a municipal water system consisting of six active groundwater wells, approximately 55 miles of water mains, and more than 2,300 service connections. The City is currently completing significant system improvements, including the development of Well 9 and the construction of a new TCP treatment facility designed to enhance water quality and supply reliability. As Fowler continues to experience steady residential and commercial growth, long-term planning for water supply, system capacity, regulatory compliance, and infrastructure investment has become increasingly critical. The City’s existing water planning documents are outdated and no longer reflect current operating conditions, state regulatory requirements, or projected future demands. To address this need, Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group has proposed preparing a comprehensive Water Master Plan that includes hydraulic modeling, demand forecasting, supply analysis, and a phased Capital Improvement Plan. This plan will provide a current assessment of system performance, identify future infrastructure needs, and support updates to development impact fees and future funding applications.
662
Section 10, Item G

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:

Goal ED-3
Fowler invests in necessary infrastructure, resources, and beautification to ensure the success of economic development strategies.

Goal SAF-3
Local watersheds, water bodies, and groundwater resources are responsibly managed.

Policy SAF-2
Continue to implement the Fresno County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to address disasters such as earthquakes, drought, flooding, hazardous material spills, water contamination, epidemics, fires, extreme weather, major transportation accidents, and terrorism.

Policy SAF-6
Annually review City Information Technology (IT) systems and security protocols and update as necessary to protect against cyber threats.

Goal PF-1
Fowler provides reliable public facilities, utilities, and community services that meet the needs of the existing community and planned growth.

Goal PF-2
Fowler maintains and manages the orderly and efficient expansion of public facilities, utilities, and community services.

Policy PF-16
Design and construct water system infrastructure as needed to meet current and future water demands and system requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total project cost of $209,400 will be funded through a combination of Water Impact Fees and the Water Enterprise Fund (Water Fund), both of which are eligible funding sources for system planning and infrastructure modernization. This allocation is consistent with the City’s adopted budget, and the City Council previously approved this item as a budgeted expenditure. No General Fund contribution is required. Completion of the Water Master Plan will also position the City to pursue future state and federal funding opportunities for water system improvements.
663
Section 10, Item G

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
This action is being brought forward for Council consideration in accordance with the Purchasing Policy. This project was publicly advertised through a formal Request for Proposals (RFP) issued on PlanetBids, the City’s approved electronic bidding platform. The RFP followed the City’s procurement policies and state requirements for professional services solicitation.

Interested firms were provided full access to the scope of work, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria. Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group submitted a complete, responsive proposal that met all RFP requirements and demonstrated strong qualifications, relevant experience, and familiarity with the City’s water system. Following staff’s review and evaluation, Provost & Pritchard was identified as the most qualified firm to perform the Water Master Plan.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Provost & Pritchard Agreement
- Provost & Pritchard Proposal
664
Section 10, Item G
665
Section 10, Item G
666
Section 10, Item G
667
Section 10, Item G
668
Section 10, Item G
669
Section 10, Item G
670
Section 10, Item G
671
Section 10, Item G
672
Section 10, Item G
673
Section 10, Item G
674
Section 10, Item G
675
Section 10, Item G
676
Section 10, Item G

Fowler City CouncilDecember 2, 2025

Fowler City Council
December 2, 2025