Fowler City Council
January 6, 2026

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 06, 2026 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625 AGENDA
This meeting is being conducted by teleconference at the following locations: Fowler City Council Chamber, 128 S. 5th Street, Fowler, CA 93625; and 2777 South Kihei Road, Kihei, HI 96753.

Each teleconference location is open to the public and any member of the public has the opportunity to address the City Council from a teleconference location in the same manner as if that person attended the meeting location. The City Council will control the conduct of the meeting and determine the appropriate order and time limitations on public comments from the teleconference locations.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance or accommodations to access the City Council Chambers or participate in this meeting, please contact the Clerk at (559) 834-3113 x102. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you may attend in person, you may appear by telephone as described below, or you may submit written comments via email to [email protected]. Please include your name and reference the agenda item you are commenting on, if any. Written comments received that do not specify an agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda. Emails received by 8:00 am on the date of the meeting will be provided to the City Council at the meeting and made part of the record of proceedings but will not be read aloud.

En cumplimiento con la Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades si necesita asistencia o adaptaciones para acceder a las Cámaras del Concejo de la Ciudad o participar en esta reunión, comuníquese con el secretario de la ciudad al (559) 834-3113 x102. También puede ponerse en contacto con el secretario si necesita servicios de traducción. La notificación al menos 48 horas antes de la reunión permitirá a la Ciudad hacer arreglos razonables para garantizar la accesibilidad.
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85297529938?pwd=4aajbOOt6pq9UExhvaL4PwxzCn_5cA.tAHPmBhwgPVUUot Telephone Number: (253) 215-8782
Meeting ID: 852 9752 9938
Passcode: 402102
Persons accessing the meeting will have an opportunity to provide comments at appropriate times during the meeting. To speak during a public comment period, press *9 on your phone to raise your hand or click “raise hand” in the webinar. At the appropriate 1 time, you will be prompted to unmute yourself, and asked to identify yourself when providing public comment.

Any writing or document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the City's website at https://fowlercity.org.

Resolutions and Ordinances - With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Councilmember that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, further reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

4. INVOCATION BY PASTOR JESUS VALENCIA FROM VISION CHURCH

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation to Outgoing Recreation Commissioner Ailynn Martinez

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council on any matter not described on this agenda. Presentations are limited to 3 minutes per person and no more than 15 minutes per topic.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and include a recommended action from Staff and shall be acted on by one motion of the Council. If a Councilmember requests additional information or would like to pull an item for discussion, that item shall be pulled from the Consent Calendar and acted upon separately. A Councilmember may register an action on an individual item without pulling the item from the Consent Calendar. A motion to approve the Consent Calendar is deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of ordinances, only those which received a unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present at introduction shall be eligible for placement on the Consent Calendar.
8A RATIFY Pay Warrants for January 6, 2026
8B APPROVE Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Meeting

9. CONTESTED CONSENT CALENDAR
2 Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be heard individually immediately after action is taken on the Consent Calendar.

10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
City Manager
A Actions pertaining to Chief of Police Agreement:
i. CONSIDER: Resolution No. 2818 adopting the salary classification schedule for all employees. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2818. ii. CONSIDER: An Employment Agreement for Chief of Police Services with Greg G. Gularte. Staff Recommendation: Approve Employment Agreement.

B DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION: Fowler Municipal Code language update C DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION: City Council compensation
Planning
D 1. CONSIDER Resolution No. 2816:
i. FINDING that Planning Project No. 24-27 is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report, and is therefore exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183, and; ii. APPROVING Planning Project No. 24-27, subject to conditions of approval.

2. CONSIDER Resolution No. 2819:
i. FINDING that approval of a Type 20 Alcohol License for Planning Project No. 24-27 is made on the basis of such approval is a public convenience or necessity.

Public Works
E CONSIDER a Side Letter Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement for Tract No. 6381 to Address Plan Revisions, Single-Story Restrictions, and Block Wall/Fencing Modifications and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Staff Recommendation: Approve side letter amendment to subdivision agreement for Tract No. 6381
F CONSIDER the following actions pertaining to Tract 6381:
i. APPROVE Resolution No. 2820 to accept the public improvements related to Tract 6381 upon receipt of the maintenance bond required by the subdivision agreement. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2820. ii. DIRECT the City Engineer to file the notice of completion and release the bonds associated with Tract 6381.
3 Fire
G PRESENTATION: Quarterly Update by Chief Dustin Hail, Fresno County Fire Protection District

11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

12. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

13. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Title: City Manager

14. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION

15. ADJOURN
Next Ordinance No. 2026-01
Next Resolution No. 2821
CERTIFICATION: I, Angela Vasquez, City Clerk of the City of Fowler, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review on Wednesday, December 31, 2025.

Angela Vasquez, CPMC
City Clerk
4 CHECK NUMBERS CHECK DATES AMOUNT

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
Regular checks 45740-45907 December 3- December 24 $ 3,499,476.79TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS $ 3,499,476.79

PAYROLL COSTS
First December Bi-Weekly Payroll $ 131,608.26
Second December Bi-Weekly Payroll $ 137,718.40
TOTAL PAYROLL COSTS $ 269,326.66
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS $ 3,768,803.45
NOTE:

CITY OF FOWLER

WARRANTS LIST
January 6, 2026
5 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45740 1001 12/03/25 14813 24/7 PET VET 5220 ANIMAL CARE 257.40 45741 1001 12/03/25 11689 A & C TIRE SERVICE 5205 OIL CHANGE 60.00 45742 1001 12/03/25 15057 A&C TIRE SERVICE 5205 BATTERY SERVICES 323.36 45742 1001 12/03/25 15057 A&C TIRE SERVICE 5205 TIRE REPAIR 20.00 45742 1001 12/03/25 15057 A&C TIRE SERVICE 5205 TIRE REPAIR 20.00 TOTAL CHECK 363.36
45743 1001 12/03/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 197.12 45744 1001 12/03/25 14992 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES, I 5110 LANGUAGE TESTING 127.00 45745 1001 12/03/25 15088 AT&T MOBILITY 5160 PHONES 1,272.96 45746 1001 12/03/25 13635 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 5200 SUPPLIES WATER 52.86 45747 1001 12/03/25 12489 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 5205 FLEET STREETS 152.72 45748 1001 12/03/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 5230 ETHERNET SWITCH 87.13 45748 1001 12/03/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 5230 NETWORK SVCS DEC25 2,832.48 45748 1001 12/03/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 5230 VOIP DEC25 1,083.73 45748 1001 12/03/25 10026 BCT CONSULTING 5230 DESKTOP SVS DEC25 3,319.00 TOTAL CHECK 7,322.34
45749 1001 12/03/25 10506 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATE 5195 ASPHALT STREETS 213.04 45750 1001 12/03/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA 5220 LEAF SERVICE NOV25 5,400.00 45750 1001 12/03/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA 5220 STREET SWEEP NOV25 3,950.00 45750 1001 12/03/25 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA 5220 SWEEP WSTE MGMT YRD 900.00 TOTAL CHECK 10,250.00
45751 1001 12/03/25 10064 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE C 2042 EMP DED NOV25 47.42 45752 1001 12/03/25 14356 COMCAST 5160 VOICE 51.64
45753 1001 12/03/25 12300 COOKS COMMUNICATIONS 5200 TIMER 178.93 45754 1001 12/03/25 14512 CSG CONSULTANTS 5225 PLAN CHECK OCT25 1,206.00 45755 1001 12/03/25 10100 ECN POLYGRAPH & INVESTIGA 5115 POLY 250.00 45756 1001 12/03/25 14243 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5104 BATTERIES 25.05 45757 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 38.13 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 16.34 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 24.50 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 43.59 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 26.34 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.89 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 17.42 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES .93 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 13.07 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 6.53 6 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 16.97 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 26.14 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 3.26 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 19.59 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 51.75 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 24.61 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 89.95 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.88 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 11.53 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 17.43 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 22.43 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 63.18 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 26.14 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.89 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 61.62 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 16.34 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 40.31 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 39.86 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 65.38 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 58.55 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 21.10 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 16.34 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.45 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 8.27 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.45 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 10.89 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 94.07 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 6.53 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 15.25 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 52.23 45758 1001 12/03/25 14245 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 STREET SUPPLIES 14.16 TOTAL CHECK 1,134.29
45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 2.40 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 19.16 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 6.53 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 26.11 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 14.36 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 264.95 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 8.70 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 8.21 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 13.71 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 28.52 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 8.71 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 5.44 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 76.28 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 15.45 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 8.71 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 67.53 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 33.76 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 20.70 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 1,094.69 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 12.62 45759 1001 12/03/25 14247 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 17.42 TOTAL CHECK 1,753.96
7 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45760 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 48.13 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 111.97 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 25.05 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 17.43 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 101.32 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 21.79 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 35.05 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 3.44 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 8.70 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 54.37 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 13.16 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 13.07 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 8.71 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 141.66 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 18.52 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 25.05 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 14.16 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 108.96 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 32.23 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 21.55 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 16.34 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 10.89 45761 1001 12/03/25 14249 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SUPPLIES PARKS 21.79 TOTAL CHECK 873.34
45762 1001 12/03/25 10104 FPOA 2045 EMP DED 11/14/25 225.00 45763 1001 12/03/25 15384 FRESNO BARK INC 5195 PARK MAINT 1,373.09 45763 1001 12/03/25 15384 FRESNO BARK INC 5195 STREET MAINT 1,373.08 TOTAL CHECK 2,746.17
45764 1001 12/03/25 10124 FRESNO SHERIFF BUS OFFICE 5271 45992 10,976.83 45765 1001 12/03/25 14671 HERO ALLIANCE 5110 CHARACTERS XMAS 730.00 45766 1001 12/03/25 14749 HOFFMAN SECURITY 5160 MONTHLY SVCS ACCESS 454.00 45766 1001 12/03/25 14749 HOFFMAN SECURITY 5220 MONIT SVC DEC25 38.00 45766 1001 12/03/25 14749 HOFFMAN SECURITY 5220 MONIT SVC DEC25 89.95 TOTAL CHECK 581.95
45767 1001 12/03/25 11022 JP COOKE CO 5110 DOG TAGS 2026 94.95 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 953.33 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,084.95 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 2041 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,420.00 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,201.63 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,507.60 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,614.03 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 1,795.55 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 8,597.24 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 9,103.88 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 3,629.09 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 2,194.87 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 2,651.58 8 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45768 1001 12/03/25 13496 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 5084 HEALTH BENEFIT DEC25 2,693.27 TOTAL CHECK 38,447.02
45769 1001 12/03/25 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 BRAKE ROTORS 2,111.87 45769 1001 12/03/25 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 BRAKES/ROTORS 858.78 45769 1001 12/03/25 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 FLAT TIRE 27.37 TOTAL CHECK 2,998.02
45770 1001 12/03/25 14428 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 5220 COBRA-NOV25 200.00 45771 1001 12/03/25 11071 PAPE MACHINERY ACCT 4437 5200 BACKHOE MAINT 425.32 45772 1001 12/03/25 14102 PICK EM UP TRUCK STORE - 5205 FLEET STREETS 330.47 45773 1001 12/03/25 14433 PRICE PAIGE & COMPANY CPA 5220 ADVISORY SERVICES 330.00 45774 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45775 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45776 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5230 GIS SERVICES 488.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WATER WELL 9 4,349.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CUP FOWLER BAPTIST 815.50 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CUP FOWLER BAPTIST 45.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 WOODSIDE HOMES 181.49 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 4TH AND 5TH ST OVERLA 193.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WELL 9 DESIGN 478.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TRAC 6027 LOT 7 728.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 PROP 68 PM 84.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CON MARSHALL ESTATES 675.82 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 BP24-0091 119 S 6TH 138.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 3067 FELIX ST 199.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 FIRE STATION REMODEL 9,294.25 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 MARSHALL ESTATES 6,565.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 SAN ANTONIO BASIN 4,715.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 PANZAK PARK 7,955.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 411 E MERCED 531.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 411 E MERCED 45.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 9TH STREET 531.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CIVIL ENGINEERING SER 13,749.12 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS 2,574.36 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 BUFORD OIL PHASE I 115.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 ADA CONTRETE RAMPS 230.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 MAP 22-0047 201.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 GENERAL PLAN ECONOMIC 1,488.24 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SRVICE REVIEW 297.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 FRESNO DRIVE THRU AND 1,477.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 FRESNO DRIVE THRU AND 231.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 MAP 24-31,20 ACRES 2,848.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 MAP 25-03 3,555.30 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 MAP 25-03 1,100.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TRUCK PARKING 1,184.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 TRUCK PARKING 595.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 JOGINDER SINGH 772.60 9 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 JOGINDER SINGH 277.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 MIXED USE 820.10 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 730 N 8TH ST 400.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 730 N 8TH ST 351.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 1021 VENTURES LLC 2,433.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 MAP REVIEW 25-28 771.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 MAP REVIEW 25-28 315.50 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 MAP 6519 JOE CROWN 939.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 MAP 6519 JOE CROWN 715.50 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CALL PLANNING FY26 28,835.03 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WATER WELL 9 22,291.07 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5230 GIS SERVICES 1,143.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CUP FOWLER BAPTIST 706.25 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 WOODSIDE HOMES 437.14 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 4TH&5TH ST OVERLAY PR 16,353.12 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WELL 9 DESIGN 924.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG-FM TRACT 69.30 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TRACT 6027 LOT 7 462.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CON MARSHALL ESTATES 231.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 DONNY WRIGHT AND HARR 140.57 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 3067 FELIX ST 346.50 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 FIRESTATION REMODEL 5,152.27 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 SAN ANTONIO BASIN INT 382.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 PANZAK PARK ACCESSIBI 3,377.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 411 E MERCED 1,569.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 2025 ONCALL CIVIL ENG 19,675.95 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 2025 CITY OF FOWLER E 2,081.60 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 730 N 8TH ST 200.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 730 N 8TH ST 435.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 NW CORNER PF PARLIER 3,770.90 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 NW CORNER PF PARLIER 2,941.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE MAP 22-0047 386.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CASA BLANCA 10 UNIT 624.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 6TH ST MIXED USE CESA 111.90 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 GE PLAN ECONOMIC 726.20 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SAFE STREETS 327.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REV 4,763.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 PLHA GRANT 109.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 20 ACRES ON SOUTH AVE 184.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 20 ACRES ON SOUTH AVE 1,792.52 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBMISSION 1,251.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBMISSION 3,192.70 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 8TH ST AHSC PROJECT 609.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 GRANT WELL NO 9 259.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TPTPM 25-18-615 W FRE 1,166.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 110 S 6TH ST 2,859.22 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 1021 VENTURES LLC 200.00 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 1021 VENTURES LLC 245.40 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 2747 E MANNING AVE BU 674.80 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 ONCALL PLANNING FY26 37,201.70 45777 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 RAW FARM CREAMERY 933.40 TOTAL CHECK 244,605.92
45778 1001 12/03/25 15340 SIERRA DISPLAY INC 5110 TREE ORNAMENTS 1,755.36 45779 1001 12/03/25 10289 SOUTH COUNTY VETERINARY H 5220 DISPOSAL OF ANIMAL 55.00 10 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 70.47 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 47.10 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 40.40 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 48.85 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 64.28 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 151.52 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 167.66 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 133.39 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 2046 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 1,109.16 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 1,079.29 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 545.56 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 487.79 45780 1001 12/03/25 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT DEC25 334.47 TOTAL CHECK 4,279.94
45781 1001 12/03/25 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 5182 FLOOR SAW 509.33 45782 1001 12/03/25 10303 SWANSON-FAHRNEY FORD 5205 F150 BRAKES 250.00 45783 1001 12/03/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 5160 CELL PHONE NOV25 527.76 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 275.49 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 2048 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 216.41 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 136.46 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 41.35 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 45.29 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 91.74 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 32.89 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 19.69 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 17.72 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 13.78 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 12.79 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 9.86 45784 1001 12/03/25 11335 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 5084 VISION BENEFIT DEC25 11.82 TOTAL CHECK 925.29
45785 1001 12/03/25 14830 WILLDAN GROUP INC 5225 INSPECTIONS OCT 25 2,042.50 TOTAL FUND 338,826.26
11 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 236 - ACTIVE TRNSPORT PLN (ATP)

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45786 1001 12/03/25 15213 4CREEKS 5710 ENGINEERING SERVICES 50,615.26 TOTAL FUND 50,615.26
12 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 255 - STATE GRANT AB178

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45787 1001 12/03/25 15149 KATCH GENERAL 5710 WORK PERFORMED OCT25 808,224.68 45788 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 856.80 45788 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 HQ CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 688.80 TOTAL CHECK 1,545.60
TOTAL FUND 809,770.28
13 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45789 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 TCP TREAT WELL7 1,952.00 45789 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 MITIGATION PROJECT 12,131.24 45789 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 TCP TREATMENT 766.00 45789 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 TCP MITIGATION PROJEC 5,850.21 TOTAL CHECK 20,699.45
TOTAL FUND 20,699.45
14 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 12/03/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 17:57:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 790 - FIRE STATION PROJECT

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45790 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 FRESNO ST 14,617.60 45790 1001 12/03/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 FRESNO STREET 14,220.10 TOTAL CHECK 28,837.70
TOTAL FUND 28,837.70
TOTAL REPORT 1,248,748.95
15 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/11/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 11:31:35 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45791 1001 12/11/25 11689 A & C TIRE SERVICE 5205 FLEET STREETS 80.00 45792 1001 12/11/25 15057 A&C TIRE SERVICE 5205 OIL CHANGE 85.00 45793 1001 12/11/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 SAFETY-HERNANDEZ 69.81 45793 1001 12/11/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5202 SUPPLIES STREET 197.12 45793 1001 12/11/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 SUPPLIES MOTA 137.04 TOTAL CHECK 403.97
45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 COUNCIL STYLUS PENS 51.70 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 R TURNEY COMP STAND 16.32 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP STREET 62.06 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP STREET 97.17 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP STREET 8.33 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP WATER 8.33 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5121 ADMIN LOBBY PENS 7.38 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5121 AP HEATER 27.70 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5230 SUPP WATER 474.16 45794 1001 12/11/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 SUPPLIES 59.81 TOTAL CHECK 812.96
45795 1001 12/11/25 15088 AT&T MOBILITY 5220 TOWER SEARCH 170.00 45795 1001 12/11/25 15088 AT&T MOBILITY 5220 TOWER SEARCH 245.00 TOTAL CHECK 415.00
45796 1001 12/11/25 12489 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 5205 FLEET PARKS 186.94 45796 1001 12/11/25 12489 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 5205 FLEET PARKS 311.06 TOTAL CHECK 498.00
45797 1001 12/11/25 13636 BIG TEX 5121 ANIMAL SVCS 338.87 45798 1001 12/11/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST 12/3/25 291.14 45799 1001 12/11/25 10025 BUFORD OIL COMPANY 5210 GAS 406.05 45800 1001 12/11/25 10506 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATE 5195 ASPHALT STREETS 208.43 45801 1001 12/11/25 12654 COMCAST 5160 INTERNET 751.02
45802 1001 12/11/25 14429 CORE & MAIN 5195 BACKFLOWSUPP 250.67 45803 1001 12/11/25 14252 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5121 SNR CTR 7.45 45804 1001 12/11/25 10802 FRESNO ROOFING 5190 TRAILER REPAIR 185.83 45804 1001 12/11/25 10802 FRESNO ROOFING 5190 TRAILER REPAIR 185.84 TOTAL CHECK 371.67
45805 1001 12/11/25 14238 INFOSEND, INC 5621 UTILITY BILL NOV25 2,853.25 45805 1001 12/11/25 14238 INFOSEND, INC 5621 MONTH MAINT NOV25 662.57 TOTAL CHECK 3,515.82
45806 1001 12/11/25 15208 JORGE NUNEZ 5110 XMAS TREE EVENT 450.00 45807 1001 12/11/25 15107 KYLCUSTOM DESIGNS 5086 HATS 540.00 45808 1001 12/11/25 12717 M&M SCREEN PRINTING 5110 EMP POLOS 79.46 16 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 12/11/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 11:31:35 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45808 1001 12/11/25 12717 M&M SCREEN PRINTING 5110 VEST CM 76.29 TOTAL CHECK 155.75
45809 1001 12/11/25 10201 METRO UNIFORM & ACCESSORI 5115 GEAR 53.94 45810 1001 12/11/25 15391 NANCY BANDA 5260 2025 MUNICIPAL FINANC 592.40 45811 1001 12/11/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5121 FLEET ANIMAL CNTRL 53.12 45811 1001 12/11/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5120 WATER CIRC SAW 425.21 TOTAL CHECK 478.33
45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 1100 N MANN 11/25 15.28 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 WELL SITE 12/1/25 9,761.24 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 GLDST/MAN SIG11/25 128.15 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS&GLDNST 11/16/25 167.37 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 128 S 5TH 12/1/25 146.01 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 128 S 5TH 12/1/25 105.77 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 1291 W SOUTH 12/1/25 10.84 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 212 E MERCED 12/1/25 172.75 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 2831 E MANN 12/1/25 93.47 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 4218 GLDNSTAT 12/1/25 50.32 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 500 E MERCED 12/1/25 445.96 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 12/1/25 9.36 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 12/1/25 738.41 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 12/1/25 16.44 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 7TH/TULARE 12/1/25 38.44 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 95 E ADAMS 12/1/25 1,901.62 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 9TH/MERCED 12/1/25 69.48 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS/5TH 12/1/25 73.95 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 CREDIT ADJUSTMENT -178.68 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 GLDNST B 12/1/25 112.03 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MAIN/5TH 12/1/25 27.10 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MERCED/6TH 12/1/25 10.84 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MERCED/7TH 12/1/25 10.84 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 RETRO FIT LOAN NOV25 941.28 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 SESWNW231521 12/1/5 5,733.54 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TEMP/GOLDN 12/1/25 10,265.03 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 220 E MAIN 12/1/25 40.28 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 429 E MERCED 11/21/25 7.39 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 300 W MERCED 11/25 36.44 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MERCED/8TH 11/25 79.38 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 700MERCE#A 11/25 677.35 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 WELL SITE 11/26/25 5,832.28 45812 1001 12/11/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MANN&GLDST 11/22/25 14.79 TOTAL CHECK 37,554.75
45813 1001 12/11/25 12060 PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP 5710 MANN 130 RR CROSS 28,650.00 45814 1001 12/11/25 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 77.27 45814 1001 12/11/25 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 77.27 45814 1001 12/11/25 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 77.28 45814 1001 12/11/25 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 77.29 TOTAL CHECK 309.11
45815 1001 12/11/25 15281 RD GRAPHICS 5205 FLEET LOGO 108.35 17 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 12/11/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 11:31:35 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45816 1001 12/11/25 10274 SAN JOAQUIN VAL AIR POLL 5176 26/27/ANNUAL PERMIT 314.00 45817 1001 12/11/25 13355 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 5195 STREET MAINT SUPP 1,392.33 45818 1001 12/11/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 5104 SENIOR SUPPLIES 164.94 45818 1001 12/11/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 5104 SENIOR SUPPLIES 311.43 45818 1001 12/11/25 10288 SMART & FINAL 5104 SENIOR SUPPLIES 93.62 TOTAL CHECK 569.99
45819 1001 12/11/25 10289 SOUTH COUNTY VETERINARY H 5220 DISPOSAL OF ANIMAL 55.00 45820 1001 12/11/25 10296 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5100 SUPPLIES 70.72 45820 1001 12/11/25 10296 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5100 SUPPLIES 33.79 45820 1001 12/11/25 10296 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5110 CITY HALL OFF SUPP 266.29 45820 1001 12/11/25 10296 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5110 STREET OFF SUPP ADMIN 133.15 45820 1001 12/11/25 10296 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5110 WATER OFF SUPP 133.15 TOTAL CHECK 637.10
45821 1001 12/11/25 13048 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE 5176 ANN DEE WATER SYST 8,629.80 45822 1001 12/11/25 15123 THE SELMA BARN 5200 EQUIP MAINT 224.27 45823 1001 12/11/25 11251 ULINE 5110 SUPPLIES KIDZ DAY 661.62 45824 1001 12/11/25 15314 UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES CO 5710 WELL#9 250,642.07 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 11/20/25 35.93 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 11/27 137.35 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 11/27 137.36 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 11/27/25 46.07 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5100 MATS 12/4/25 9.70 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 12/4 9.70 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS12/4 71.73 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 12/4 110.32 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 12/4 110.33 45825 1001 12/11/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 12/4/25 35.93 TOTAL CHECK 704.42
45826 1001 12/11/25 13521 UNITY IT 5230 COMPUTER SUPPORT 337.50 45827 1001 12/11/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 5160 WIFI HOTSPOT 40.01 45827 1001 12/11/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 5160 CELL PHONE NOV25 43.66 TOTAL CHECK 83.67
TOTAL FUND 341,580.45
18 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 12/11/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 11:31:35 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45828 1001 12/11/25 15214 HPS MECHANICAL, INC. 5710 TCP WELL 7 19,950.00 TOTAL FUND 19,950.00
TOTAL REPORT 361,530.45
19 Section 8, Item 8A
20 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/17/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 19:32:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45834 1001 12/17/25 15013 ADVANCED PEST WIPEOUT 5185 PEST CONTROL 12/12/25 90.00 45834 1001 12/17/25 15013 ADVANCED PEST WIPEOUT 5185 PEST CONTROL 12/12/25 95.00 TOTAL CHECK 185.00
45835 1001 12/17/25 15399 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 5300 TACTICAL RIFLE COURSE 339.00 45836 1001 12/17/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 289.16 45836 1001 12/17/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 SUPPLIES WATER 95.88 45836 1001 12/17/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 SUPPLIES PARKS 38.98 TOTAL CHECK 424.02
45837 1001 12/17/25 10014 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASS 5250 RENEW MEMBERSHIP 470.00 45838 1001 12/17/25 15382 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS 5202 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT 4,382.00 45839 1001 12/17/25 15168 BETTER ENTERPRISES, INC. 5710 WORKED PERFORMEDNOV25 47,932.92 45839 1001 12/17/25 15168 BETTER ENTERPRISES, INC. 5710 WORK PERFORMED-OCT 115,745.41 TOTAL CHECK 163,678.33
45840 1001 12/17/25 14429 CORE & MAIN 5195 GALV FITTINGS-WATER 2,312.30 45840 1001 12/17/25 14429 CORE & MAIN 5195 GALV FITTINGS-WATER 518.17 TOTAL CHECK 2,830.47
45841 1001 12/17/25 14188 DATA TICKET 5230 CITATIONS 194.00 45842 1001 12/17/25 15411 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. 5086 HAT BADGE 125.75 45843 1001 12/17/25 14243 FOWLER ACE HARDWARE 5100 MASTER KEY 4.35 45844 1001 12/17/25 10114 FOWLER BUTANE SERVICES 5200 PROPANE DISPENSER 22.65 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL 11,713.86 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS AUG25 283.59 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS NOV25 78.91 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS OCT25 221.11 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS SEP25 182.24 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL WTR AUG25 66.59 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL WTR NOV25 109.33 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL BLDG OCT25 78.72 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL PARKS AUG25 405.09 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL PARKS NOV25 354.65 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL PARKS OCT25 211.38 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL PARKS SEP25 245.05 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREET AUG25 1,824.33 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS NOV25 735.80 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS OCT25 1,382.90 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL STREETS SEP25 695.18 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL WATER AUG25 376.87 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL WATER NOV25 966.09 45845 1001 12/17/25 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL WATER OCT25 219.42 TOTAL CHECK 20,151.11
45846 1001 12/17/25 10854 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE 5300 IA COURSE 105.00 45847 1001 12/17/25 14998 GARTON TRACTOR 5200 REPAIR TRACK LOAD 941.43 45847 1001 12/17/25 14998 GARTON TRACTOR 5200 REPAIR TRACK LOAD 941.44 21 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 12/17/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 19:32:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45847 1001 12/17/25 14998 GARTON TRACTOR 5200 REPAIR TRACK LOAD 941.44 TOTAL CHECK 2,824.31
45848 1001 12/17/25 11116 GRAINGER 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 71.06 45849 1001 12/17/25 15061 JB ELECTRIC 5195 WATER SUPPLIES 34.33 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 2,372.50 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 3,525.50 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 50.00 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 3,353.00 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 1,275.00 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 100.00 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 400.65 45850 1001 12/17/25 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5620 LEGAL SERVICES NOV25 1,153.00 TOTAL CHECK 12,229.65
45851 1001 12/17/25 15407 MCCURLEY AND DAY MASONRY, 5710 FENCE REPAIR 7,440.00 45851 1001 12/17/25 15407 MCCURLEY AND DAY MASONRY, 5710 FENCE REPAIR 7,440.00 TOTAL CHECK 14,880.00
45852 1001 12/17/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5195 PARK SUPPLIES 259.64 45852 1001 12/17/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5185 SUPPLIES CITY HALL 86.77 TOTAL CHECK 346.41
45853 1001 12/17/25 14843 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 5205 FLEET STREETS 51.26 45853 1001 12/17/25 14843 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 5205 FLEET-WATER 285.61 TOTAL CHECK 336.87
45854 1001 12/17/25 11071 PAPE MACHINERY ACCT 4437 5205 BOOM TRUCK REPAIR 107.22 45855 1001 12/17/25 15409 PRETZER FARMS & SERVICES 5300 SAFETY TRAINING 500.00 45856 1001 12/17/25 10289 SOUTH COUNTY VETERINARY H 5220 DISPOSAL OF ANIMAL 55.00 45857 1001 12/17/25 10085 STATE OF CA DEPARTMENT OF 5310 FINGERPRINTS 91.00 45858 1001 12/17/25 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 5182 TENCHER WLK BEHND 228.76 45859 1001 12/17/25 12791 THE MOWERS EDGE 5715 BLOWER PARKS 695.89 45859 1001 12/17/25 12791 THE MOWERS EDGE 5715 BLOWER STREETS 695.89 TOTAL CHECK 1,391.78
45860 1001 12/17/25 13137 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 5220 CONSULTING NOV25 4,000.00 45861 1001 12/17/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 12/11 121.65 45861 1001 12/17/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 12/11 121.66 45861 1001 12/17/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 12/11/25 46.07 TOTAL CHECK 289.38
45862 1001 12/17/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT CA 5220 GREEN WASTE KING EST 166.84 45862 1001 12/17/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT CA 5220 SUNNYSIDE/MAPLE WASTE 166.84 TOTAL CHECK 333.68
TOTAL FUND 230,631.13
22 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 12/17/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 19:32:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 23 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 12/17/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 19:32:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45863 1001 12/17/25 15214 HPS MECHANICAL, INC. 5710 TCP WELL 7 1,254,198.55 TOTAL FUND 1,254,198.55
TOTAL REPORT 1,484,829.68
24 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/17/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 20:02:28 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45864 1001 12/17/25 15405 BLANCO SHYANNE 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 105.53 45865 1001 12/17/25 15404 JASVEER S GILL 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 100.00 45866 1001 12/17/25 14933 OGAWA, MICHELLE 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 100.00 TOTAL FUND 305.53
TOTAL REPORT 305.53
25 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/18/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 14:26:13 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45867 1001 12/18/25 15116 JACOB MORENO 5110 SENIOR XMAS LUNCH 300.00 TOTAL FUND 300.00
TOTAL REPORT 300.00
26 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 12:53:47 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45868 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 DONNY WRIGHT AND HARR 451.20 45868 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE MAP 22-0047 321.15 TOTAL CHECK 772.35
TOTAL FUND 772.35
TOTAL REPORT 772.35
27 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45869 1001 12/24/25 14813 24/7 PET VET 5220 ANIMAL CARE 257.40 45870 1001 12/24/25 11689 A & C TIRE SERVICE 5200 WINDHSHIELD BLADES 120.00 45871 1001 12/24/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 SUPPLIES PARKS 248.08 45871 1001 12/24/25 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 425.37 TOTAL CHECK 673.45
45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP PLANNING 74.09 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 OFF SUPP STREETS 23.38 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 27.72 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 27.73 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5710 SCADA 797.84 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 SUPPLIES 274.48 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 SUPPLIES 63.15 45872 1001 12/24/25 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 HAND SANITIZER 25.28 TOTAL CHECK 1,313.67
45873 1001 12/24/25 13635 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 5200 SUPPLIES WATER 32.40 45874 1001 12/24/25 14354 BOOT BARN, INC. 5130 BOOTS CARRASCO 200.00 45875 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST 7/15/25 280.00 45876 1001 12/24/25 10506 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATE 5195 ASPHALT STREETS 324.80 45877 1001 12/24/25 10043 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES 5195 ARMED FORCES FLAGS 933.31 45878 1001 12/24/25 15232 CFM-SF, INC. 5710 FLOW METER WELL 5 6,764.99 45878 1001 12/24/25 15232 CFM-SF, INC. 5710 FLOW METER 5,834.94 TOTAL CHECK 12,599.93
45879 1001 12/24/25 14429 CORE & MAIN 5195 BACKFLOW SUPP 231.94 45880 1001 12/24/25 14512 CSG CONSULTANTS 5225 PLAN CHECK SEPT25 1,574.50 45880 1001 12/24/25 14512 CSG CONSULTANTS 5225 PLAN CHECK NOV25 469.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,043.50
45881 1001 12/24/25 10430 FAVORITOS RESTAURANT 5110 BANQUET HALL 700.00 45882 1001 12/24/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5220 ANNUAL MEM DUE NEPTUN 9,002.11 45882 1001 12/24/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 369.24 45882 1001 12/24/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 97.09 45882 1001 12/24/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5205 WTR LINE REPAIR 260.52 45882 1001 12/24/25 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 123.70 TOTAL CHECK 9,852.66
45883 1001 12/24/25 14937 FLOCK SAFETY 5715 ANNUAL RENEWEL 15,000.00 45884 1001 12/24/25 10104 FPOA 2045 EMP DED 12/12/25 225.00 45885 1001 12/24/25 10802 FRESNO ROOFING 5190 TRAILER REPAIR 289.59 45885 1001 12/24/25 10802 FRESNO ROOFING 5190 TRAILER REPAIR 289.59 TOTAL CHECK 579.18
45886 1001 12/24/25 14749 HOFFMAN SECURITY 5160 CITY HALL SERVICE CAL 110.00 28 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45887 1001 12/24/25 15118 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC 5206 WELL 7 GEN SVC 1,965.29 45887 1001 12/24/25 15118 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC 5206 WELL 8 GEN SVC 1,965.29 TOTAL CHECK 3,930.58
45888 1001 12/24/25 15061 JB ELECTRIC 5185 CITY HALL ELECTRICAL 547.16 45889 1001 12/24/25 12076 KEY DESIGN LOCKSMITHING 5190 VAULT DOOR LOCK 170.00 45890 1001 12/24/25 10819 MID COUNTY FIRE EXTINGUIS 5185 ANNUAL MAINT EXTENG 384.67 45890 1001 12/24/25 10819 MID COUNTY FIRE EXTINGUIS 5185 ANNUAL MAINT EXTENG 384.67 45890 1001 12/24/25 10819 MID COUNTY FIRE EXTINGUIS 5185 ANNUAL MAINT EXTENG 384.67 TOTAL CHECK 1,154.01
45891 1001 12/24/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 110.83 45891 1001 12/24/25 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5195 SUPPLIES PARKS 37.96 TOTAL CHECK 148.79
45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS/TEEMP 12/15/25 212.55 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 WALTER/FRES 12/15/25 15.70 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TRACT 5834 12/15/25 64.56 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 NNY 12/15/25 222.77 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 128 S 5TH 12/15/25 803.49 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 8TH/VNE 12/15/25 17.15 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS/DEEAN 12/15/25 20.92 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 CLAYTON/ARMST 12/15/2 265.60 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 GLDST/VLY DR 12/15/25 210.91 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1 A HWY LT 12/15/25 20.77 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1 C HWY 12/15/25 338.81 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1 E HWY LT 12/15/25 12.94 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1F HWY LT 12/15/25 47.95 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1-F HWY LT 12/15/25 11.32 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS1-F HWY LT 12/15/25 412.48 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS2 A HWY LT 12/15/25 1,559.37 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS2 A HWY LT 12/15/25 44.68 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS2 A HWY LT 12/15/25 66.39 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LS2A HWY LT 12/15/25 1,009.28 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 LSI E HWW LT 12/15/25 1,116.09 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 SUMER&MAGNOL 12/15/25 6.39 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 SUMNER/HW99 12/15/25 12.76 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 T5088 12/15/25 144.80 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TEMP/PARL 12/15/25 44.68 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TR5041 12/15/25 116.56 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TR5090 12/15/25 30.65 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TSFR 3 LTS 12/15/25 13.66 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 325 S 5TH 12/8/25 205.25 45892 1001 12/24/25 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TRACT 5212 12/15/25 135.71 TOTAL CHECK 7,184.19
45893 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45894 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45895 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK
45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5230 GIS SERVICES 118.40 29 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WATER WELL NO9 3,624.90 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG CUP FOWLER BAPTIS 715.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG TRACT 6274 WOODSI 304.43 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WELL 9 DESIGN PM 789.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG FM TRACT 6405 2,386.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CITY O FOWLER ENG CON 527.98 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG FB BP23-0343 3036 166.09 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 ENG FIRESTATION REMOD 9,832.34 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 MARSHALL ESTATE II RE 6,844.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 SAN ANTONIO BASIN INT 1,322.40 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 PANZAK PARK ACCESSIBI 9,906.10 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WELL 9 BIRD NESTING U 1,664.93 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG FB BP25 125 409 4 1,431.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 ENG FB BP25 032 113 1 600.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 TENTATIVE MAP 22-0047 737.10 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 PLN TENTATIVE SUBDIVI 108.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 GENERAL PLAN ECONOMIC 2,759.46 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITY OF FOWLER MUNICI 440.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW NO 2 200.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 ZONE CLEARANCE NO 24- 209.10 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 3,460.70 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 2,293.30 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 693.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 9,762.80 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 ABANDONMENT OF RIGHT 189.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPL 284.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPL 400.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 1,177.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 963.90 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 446.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 63.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITY OF FOWLER DOWNTO 495.20 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 215.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW 26-1 600.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW 26-1 492.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW NO 2 789.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW 25 2 631.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW 25 2 1,087.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 ZONING CLEARENCE NO 2 251.10 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 PRELIMINARY MAP REVIE 2,245.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 PRELIMINARY MAP REVIE 1,300.30 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 PRELIMINARY MAP REVIE 1,000.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 PRELIMINARY MAP REVIE 1,729.80 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITY OF FOWLER ON CAL 28,179.20 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SPR 25 07 720 N 8TH T 534.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SPR 25 07 720 N 8TH T 1,361.70 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 2025 ON CALL CIVIL EN 21,613.41 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 2025 CITY OF FOWLER E 1,547.82 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 292.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 731.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WATER WELL NO 9 15,668.90 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5230 GIS SERVICE 44.40 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SAFE STREETS FOR ALL 84.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SAFE STREETS FOR ALL 1,306.70 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITYOFFOWLER MINUCIPA 4,257.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITYOFFOWLER PLHA 642.00 30 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CUP NO 24-27 418 W FR 231.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CUP NO 24-27 418 W FR 3,036.97 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 115.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 4,041.20 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 CUP 25 06 340 N 7TH S 121.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 ZONE CLEARENCE 250121 288.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 EPA GRANT WELL NO 9 S 748.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 121.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 2,315.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2516 2,546.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2516 472.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 978.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW NO 2 983.20 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN ERVIEW 25-2 169.30 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 PRELIMINARY MAP REVIE 63.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 VESTING TENTATIVE SUB 100.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 VESTING TENTATIVE SUB 1,651.47 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 2026 CITY OF FOWLER Z 779.80 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 VARIANCE NO 25 40 111 2,715.66 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 VARIANCE NO 2542 1000 3,007.70 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 979.60 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 3,546.50 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2543 400.00 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2543 458.80 45896 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5520 CITY OF FOWLER ON CAL 29,106.40 TOTAL CHECK 210,500.16
45897 1001 12/24/25 14479 RG POWER 5120 SUPPLIES PARKS 433.39 45898 1001 12/24/25 15083 THE CHLORINATOR POOL SERV 5203 FOUNTAIN SVC DEC25 250.00 45899 1001 12/24/25 14065 THE WATER CONNECTION, INC 5195 RP ASSEMBLY 1,454.88 45899 1001 12/24/25 14065 THE WATER CONNECTION, INC 5195 SUPPLIES WATER 1,671.38 TOTAL CHECK 3,126.26
45900 1001 12/24/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5100 MATS 12/4/18 9.70 45900 1001 12/24/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 12/18 3.63 45900 1001 12/24/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 12/18 9.70 45900 1001 12/24/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 12/18 111.57 45900 1001 12/24/25 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 12/18 111.58 TOTAL CHECK 246.18
45901 1001 12/24/25 10725 VERIZON WIRELESS 5160 CELL PHONE OCT-NOV 136.60 45902 1001 12/24/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT CA 5220 MERCED ST WASTE 166.84 45902 1001 12/24/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT CA 5220 TEMPERANCE WASTE 166.84 45902 1001 12/24/25 10001 WASTE MANAGEMENT CA 5220 SUNNYSIDE 166.94 TOTAL CHECK 500.62
TOTAL FUND 273,805.18
31 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 255 - STATE GRANT AB178

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45903 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 ENG PD HQ CONSTRUCTIO 268.80 45904 1001 12/24/25 15029 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANAGE 5710 PDHQ CM-NOV 2025 53,885.50 TOTAL FUND 54,154.30
32 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 503 - TCP FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45905 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST TCP JUL25 6,542.25 45905 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST TCP AUG25 10,398.00 45905 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST TCP SEP25 5,092.50 45905 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST TCP OCT25 7,371.25 45905 1001 12/24/25 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TEST TCP NOV25 1,484.75 TOTAL CHECK 30,888.75
45906 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 CITY OF FOWLER TCP TR 3,718.00 45906 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 CM & OBSERVATION SERV 11,789.01 45906 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 CITY OF FOWLER TCP TR 564.00 TOTAL CHECK 16,071.01
TOTAL FUND 46,959.76
33 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 12/24/2025 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:34:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/26
FUND - 790 - FIRE STATION PROJECT

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 45907 1001 12/24/25 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 FRESNO STREET RECONST 27,752.00 TOTAL FUND 27,752.00
TOTAL REPORT 402,671.24
34 Section 8, Item 8A

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 02, 2025 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625

MINUTES

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Mejia called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL

PRESENT
Juan Mejia
Amarjeet Gill
Leonard Hammer
Karnig Kazarian
Daniel Parra
City Staff Present: City Manager Reid, City Attorney Cross, Finance Director Banda, City Planner Czeshinski, Fire Battalion Chief Dominguez, Community & Economic Development Director Flood, Interim Police Chief Gularte, Recreation Supervisor Hernandez, City Planner Marple, City Engineer Park, Public Works Director Rocha, City Clerk Vasquez

6. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Swearing in of Police Officer Jesus Alvarado

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion made by Parra, Seconded by Kazarian.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
A. RATIFY Pay Warrants for December 2, 2025
B. APPROVE Minutes of the October 21, 2025 City Council Meeting C. APPROVE Minutes of the October 27, 2025 Special City Council Meeting D. APPROVE Minutes of the November 4, 2025 City Council Meeting E. APPROVE 2026 Community Events Calendar
35 Section 8, Item 8B
F. APPROVE Resolution No. 2813 setting the regular City Council meeting schedule for calendar year 2026
G. Actions pertaining to Commission appointments
i. REAPPOINT Roy Alatorre to the Recreation Commission for the full term ending 12/31/27
ii. REAPPOINT Monique Velasquez-Lopez to the Recreation Commission for the full term ending 12/31/27
H. APPROVE Resolution No. 2814 adopting the monthly employee share of health benefits premiums for calendar year 2026
I. APPROVE Resolution No. 2815 amending the City’s records retention schedule and Records Management Program Policy and Procedures Manual

10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
City Manager
A. APPROVE an agreement to provide City Attorney legal services for the City of Fowler with the law firm Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Motion made by Gill, Seconded by Hammer.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
B. APPROVE the City of Fowler official response to the Fresno County Civil Grand Jury Report
Motion made by Kazarian, Seconded by Gill.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
Planning
C. Presentation on traffic control alternatives
One member of the public spoke.

D. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to amend the agreement with County of Fresno for the implementation of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the year 24-25 for the Fowler Panzak Park ADA Improvements Project funds Motion made by Gill, Seconded by Parra.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
36 Section 8, Item 8B
E. APPROVE Resolution No. 2816:
i. FINDING that Planning Project No. 24-27 is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report, and is therefore exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183, and; ii. APPROVING Planning Project No. 24-27, subject to conditions of approval.

One member of the public spoke.

A representative of the applicant, Paul Archer, shared a presentation.

Applicant, Dawood Hotar spoke.

Councilmember Parra made a motion to continue the item to the January 6, 2026 Council meeting with direction to staff.

Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gill
Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
F. APPROVE Resolution No. 2817:
i. Finding that the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement qualifies for a Class 12 categorical exemption under CEQA.
ii. APPROVE a Disposition and Development Agreement with Mailbox Money LLC for the property located at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and East Vine Street, .85 acres consisting of two parcels (APNs 343-233-02ST and 343- 233-03ST).
iii. AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute the agreement and carry out the processes necessary to culminate the agreement.

A representative, Brittany Delgado, from Mailbox Money, LLC spoke.

Councilmember Kazarian made a motion to approve, with direction to amend the payment schedule in Section 1, Conveyance of the Property, Subsection B, Purchase Price, to state the $110,000 balance to be paid within one (1) year from Close of Escrow.

Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gill
Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
Public Works
G. APPROVE an Agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group for Preparation of the City of Fowler Water Master Plan in the amount of $209,400.00 and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the Agreement.

Motion made by Gill, Seconded by Kazarian.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
37 Section 8, Item 8B

11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Updates were given by Public Works Director Rocha, Recreation Supervisor Hernandez, City Engineer Park, and City Manager Reid.

12. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Updates were given by Councilmember Kazarian, Councilmember Parra, Mayor Pro Tem Gill, Councilmember Hammer, and Mayor Mejia.

13. CLOSED SESSION
Government Code Section 54957
Public Employee Appointment/Employment
Title: Chief of Police
Government Code Section 54957.6
Conference with labor negotiators
Agency designated representative: City Manager and City Attorney Unrepresented employee: Chief of Police
The meeting went into closed session at 8:15 p.m.

14. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION
The meeting reconvened into open session at 9:17 p.m.

There was no reportable action taken on any of the two items.

15. ADJOURN
Having no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:17 p.m. 38 Section 8, Item 8B

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 6, 2026
FROM: MICHAEL REID, City Manager
SUBJECT: Actions pertaining to Chief of Police Agreement:
i. CONSIDER: Resolution No. 2818 adopting the salary
classification schedule for all employees. Staff
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2818.
ii. CONSIDER: An Employment Agreement for Chief of
Police Services with Greg G. Gularte. Staff
Recommendation: Approve Employment Agreement.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommend the City Council approve a resolution adopting the new salary classification schedule for all employees and approve a Chief of Police employment Agreement with Greg G. Gularte.

BACKGROUND
The position of Chief of Police for the City of Fowler was vacated when the previous Chief of Police resigned on April 15, 2025, and was appointed as the City Manager. At that time, a job opening for the position of Chief of Police was posted on the City of Fowler website as the City Manager began the process of recruiting and hiring the permanent Chief of Police position for the City of Fowler.

On August 5, 2026, City Council approved Resolution 2797 which adopted an exception to the CalPERS 180-day waiting period pursuant to California Government Code 7522.56(f)(1). This action allowed the city to hire Greg G. Gularte as the Interim Chief of Police as the city continued its search for a permanent Chief of Police.

Chief Gularte has served in this capacity since August 5, 2025, demonstrating his extensive expertise in public safety leadership and his capabilities as the Chief of Police. Based on his time as the Interim Chief of Police, Greg G. Gularte now desires to become the permanent Chief of Police.

The Chief of Police Employment Agreement includes the following conditions of employment, compensation, and benefits to be paid to Chief Gularte:
 Placement at Step E of the new proposed salary schedule for the Chief of Police classification at $6,457.50 bi-weekly ($167,895.00 annually). 39 Section 10, Item A
 A uniform allowance of $900 per year, consistent with other Fowler Police Department employees.
 Chief Gularte is an at-will employee, and if terminated without cause, will be eligible to receive three months of severance compensation in return for not pursuing any right to an administrative appeal under Government Code Section 3304(c).  City will provide an unmarked vehicle equipped with emergency equipment for Gularte’s use. The vehicle will only be used for official City business and driving to and from work. The vehicle will be in lieu of the $500 per month vehicle allowance given to other department directors. Employee may elect to switch to the $500 per month vehicle allowance in lieu of the take home vehicle with 30-day notice to the City Manager.  Chief Gularte’s prior full-time public service will be acknowledged through vacation accrual at the same level as employees with ten years of continuous employment with the City.
 If Chief Gularte enters CalPERS as a “Classic member,” the City would pay 100% of the employee contribution. If Chief Gularte enters as a “PEPRA member,” the City would pay 50% of the employee contribution.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
“This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.”

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is not associated with a specific General Plan Goal, Policy, or Action Item.

However, this action is consistent with the General Plan’s Community Vision and Supporting Principles.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Police Chief salary is included in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 approved budget and will be included in the Fiscal Year 2026/27 proposed budget.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
No procurement is associated with this action.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Resolution No. 2818 and Exhibit A: Salary Classification - Agreement
40 Section 10, Item A
RESOLUTION NO. 2818

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER

ADOPTING SALARY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36506 requires the City Council, by resolution or ordinance, to fix the compensation for all appointive officers and employees of the city; and WHEREAS, the Salary Classification Schedule attached as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution has been reviewed and considered by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fowler as follows:

1. The Salary Classification Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is adopted.

2. All prior resolutions concerning the compensation of the City employees that are in conflict with the Resolution or the attached Salary Classification Schedule are hereby repealed, and this Resolution shall be effective January 6, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of January 2026, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
41 Section 10, Item A
Effective 1/6/2026 Revised 1/6/2026

FULL TIME STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP

POSITION/CLASSIFICATION TITLE A B C D E
CITY MANAGER (by contract) - - - - 7,307.6960
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 5,039.1138 5,290.5046 5,555.5477 5,832.8308 6,124.7077 CITY CLERK/PERSONNEL MANAGER 3,647.0492 3,829.2369 4,020.8400 4,221.8585 4,432.7631 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 2,588.2892 2,717.7508 2,853.8031 2,995.9754 3,146.1508 ACCOUNTANT ! 2,613.2400 2,744.1138 2,881.1077 3,025.1631 3,176.2800 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ! 1,619.4462 1,699.9477 1,784.6862 1,874.6031 1,967.8154 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN ! 1,787.0400 1,876.4862 1,970.6400 2,069.0308 2,172.6000 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1,787.0400 1,876.4862 1,970.6400 2,069.0308 2,172.6000 BUILDING INSPECTOR I @ 1,787.0400 1,876.4862 1,970.6400 2,069.0308 2,172.6000 BUILDING INSPECTOR II @ 2,072.7969 2,176.3662 2,285.1138 2,399.0400 2,519.5569 BUILDING OFFICIAL 2,787.4246 2,927.2431 3,072.7108 3,226.6523 3,388.1262 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I # 1,659.4615 1,742.3169 1,829.4092 1,921.2092 2,017.7169 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II # 1,787.0400 1,876.4862 1,970.6400 2,069.0308 2,172.6000 PLANNING & CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN I 1,831.7631 1,923.5631 2,020.0708 2,120.8154 2,226.7385 PROJECTS AND COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATOR 2,787.4246 2,927.2431 3,072.7108 3,226.6523 3,388.1262 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 4,345.2000 4,562.2246 4,790.5477 5,029.6985 5,281.0892 FINANCE DIRECTOR 4,453.4769 4,675.6800 4,909.6523 5,155.8646 5,413.8462 FINANCE DIRECTOR & TREASURER 5,155.8646 5,413.8462 5,684.5385 5,968.8831 6,267.3508 FIRE CHIEF 4,345.2000 4,562.2246 4,790.5477 5,029.6985 5,281.0892 FIRE CAPTAIN 3,232.3015 3,394.7169 3,564.1938 3,742.1446 3,929.5108 FIRE ENGINEER 2,345.3723 2,462.1231 2,585.4646 2,714.9262 2,850.5077 FIREFIGHTER 2,232.3877 2,343.0185 2,460.2400 2,584.0523 2,713.0431 MAINTENANCE ASSISTANT $ 1,466.9169 1,540.3569 1,617.5631 1,698.0646 1,782.8031 MAINTENANCE WORKER $ 1,700.8892 1,786.0985 1,875.5446 1,969.2277 2,068.0892 SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER $ 1,877.4277 1,971.5815 2,070.4431 2,174.0123 2,282.2892 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER 2,464.0062 2,586.8769 2,716.3385 2,851.9200 2,994.5631 PERMITS & ENTITLEMENTS COORDINATOR 2,072.7969 2,176.3662 2,285.1138 2,399.0400 2,519.5569 POLICE CHIEF (by contract) - - - - 6,457.5000
POLICE CORPORAL I 2,808.8308 2,949.3969 3,097.4400 3,251.9631 3,414.4615 POLICE LIEUTENANT I 3,596.4000 3,775.8462 3,964.2646 4,163.1508 4,371.0092 POLICE OFFICER I 2,423.0215 2,543.1508 2,671.2554 2,804.3446 2,944.4123 POLICE OFFICER + 2% POST - INTERMEDIATE 2,471.3723 2,594.4923 2,724.0923 2,860.6708 3,002.7323 POLICE OFFICER + 5% POST - ADVANCED 2,543.1508 2,671.2554 2,804.3446 2,944.9108 3,091.4585 POLICE SERGEANT I 3,100.9292 3,255.4523 3,418.4492 3,589.4215 3,768.8677 POLICE SERGEANT + 2% POST - INTERMEDIATE 3,162.7385 3,321.2492 3,487.2369 3,661.2000 3,844.6338 POLICE SERGEANT + 5% POST - ADVANCED 3,255.4523 3,418.4492 3,589.4215 3,768.8677 3,957.7846 PUBLIC WORKS & PUBLIC UTILITIES DIR 5,155.8646 5,413.8462 5,684.5385 5,968.8831 6,267.3508 PUBLIC WORKS & PUBLIC UTILITIES MANAGER 3,647.0492 3,829.4017 4,020.8718 4,221.9154 4,433.0111 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR 2,787.4246 2,927.2431 3,072.7108 3,226.6523 3,388.1262 RECORDS AND PROPERTY TECHNICIAN I % 1,430.6677 1,502.6954 1,578.0185 1,656.6369 1,739.4923 CRIME ANALYST 2,249.5569 2,362.2092 2,479.8462 2,603.9631 2,734.5600 RECORDS AND PROPERTY TECHNICIAN II % 1,659.4615 1,742.3169 1,829.4092 1,921.2092 2,017.7169 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER 1,757.0769 1,844.8062 1,937.0215 2,034.2215 2,136.4062 RECREATION AND SENIOR CENTER SUPERVISOR 2,787.4246 2,927.2431 3,072.7108 3,226.6523 3,388.1262 WATER OPERATOR IN TRAINING ^ 1,430.6677 1,502.6954 1,578.0185 1,656.6369 1,739.4923 WATER OPERATOR I ^ 1,659.4615 1,742.3169 1,829.4092 1,921.2092 2,017.7169 WATER OPERATOR II ^ 1,832.2338 1,923.5631 2,019.6000 2,120.8154 2,226.7385 LEAD WATER OPERATOR 2,588.2892 2,717.7508 2,853.8031 2,995.9754 3,146.1508

PART TIME, INTERMITTENT, HOURLY & TEMPORARY STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP

POSITION/CLASSIFICATION TITLE A B C D E
POLICE CADET 1,877.4277 1,971.5815 2,070.4431 2,174.0123 2,282.2892 ! @ # $ % ^ Denotes a "Skill Range" pursuant to the Employee Benefits Handbook.

BI-WEEKLY PAY

SALARY CLASSIFICATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

BI-WEEKLY PAY

EXHIBIT A
42 Section 10, Item A
1 CHIEF OF POLICE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Chief of Police Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on January 6, 2025, by and between the City of Fowler, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Greg Gularte (“Gularte”), with respect to the following Recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement:

RECITALS
A. City’s former Chief of Police recently resigned with an effective date of August 5, 2025.

B. Gularte desires to become the new Chief of Police for the City, and on August 5, 2025, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, the City Council conditionally appointed Gularte as Interim Chief of Police subject to conditions of employment to be included in an agreement considered by the City Council at its regular City Council meeting on August 5, 2025.

C. Gularte and City desire for Gularte’s employment as Chief of Police to be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, Gularte and City agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Employment. City will employ Gularte as its Chief of Police, effective January 6, 2026, and Gularte shall be an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the City Manager subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Gularte shall provide service at the direction and under the supervision of the City Manager or authorized designee. It is the intent of the parties that Gularte shall keep the City Manager or authorized designee fully apprised of all significant ongoing operations of the Fowler Police Department, and Gularte shall report directly to the City Manager or authorized designee.
(a) At-Will. Gularte acknowledges that he is an at-will employee of City who shall serve at the pleasure of the City Manager at all times during the period of employment.

The terms of the City’s personnel rules, policies, procedures, ordinances, or resolutions (collectively “Personnel Policies”) shall not apply to Gularte to the extent such Personnel Policies conflict with this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, or does, confer upon Gularte any right to any property interest in continued employment, or any due process right to a hearing before or after a decision by the City Manager to terminate Gularte’s employment, except as expressly provided in Section 9 of this Agreement.

Nothing contained in this Agreement shall in any way prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the City to terminate the employment of Gularte as provided in Section 9.

Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of Gularte to resign at any time from this position with City, subject only to the provisions set forth in Section 9 of this Agreement. This at-will employment Agreement shall be expressly subject to the rights and obligations of City and Gularte as set forth in Section 9 herein.
(b) Duties. Gularte, as the Chief of Police, shall be vested with the powers, duties and responsibilities set forth in applicable state and federal law, the Fowler Municipal Code 43 Section 10, Item A
2 and the City’s job description for Chief of Police, as all may be amended from time to time, and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. Without additional compensation, Gularte shall provide such other services as are customary and appropriate to the position of Chief of Police, together with such additional services assigned from time to time by City Manager as may be consistent with state and federal law and the Fowler Municipal Code. Gularte shall devote his best efforts and full-time attention to the performance of these duties.
(c) Hours of Work. Gularte shall devote the time necessary to adequately perform his duties as Chief of Police. The parties expect that a minimum of forty (40) hours per week during regular business hours, as well as additional time outside of the normal business hours, will be required to satisfy this requirement. Toward that end, Gularte shall be allowed reasonable flexibility in setting his own office hours, based upon a regular fiveday workweek, provided the schedule of such hours provides adequate availability to the City Manager, City staff, and members of the community during normal business hours and for the performance of his duties and of City business. The position of Chief of Police shall be deemed an exempt position under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Gularte’s compensation (whether salary or benefits or other allowances) is not based on hours worked and Gularte shall not be entitled to any compensation for overtime. (d) Professional Organizations and Activities. During the period of employment, City desires Gularte to be reasonably active in national, statewide, regional and professional organizations that will contribute to Gularte’s professional development and standing and that will contribute to the advancement of the City’s interests and standing. Toward that end, Gularte may, upon advance notice to and approval of the City Manager, undertake such activities as are directly related to his professional development and that advance the interests and standing of the City, provided that such activities do not unreasonably interfere with or adversely affect his employment as Chief of Police or the performance of his duties as provided herein. Participation in such activities shall be subject to the constraints of the City’s adopted budget. City agrees to budget and pay for the reasonable dues and subscriptions of Gularte necessary for his participation in such organizations subject to the approval of the City Manager.

2. Term. This Agreement and Gularte’s employment as Chief of Police shall continue indefinitely until terminated by either party, with or without cause, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, or modified or amended by mutual written agreement of both parties.

3. Salary. Beginning January 9, 2026, Gularte shall receive a bi-weekly salary of $6,457.50 ($167,895.00 annually), which shall be reflected as the new Step E of the Chief of Police classification on the City’s adopted salary classification schedule and is entitled to any costof-living adjustments as may be approved and reflected in any subsequent adopted salary schedules of the City. Gularte shall be eligible for consideration of advancement on any subsequently adopted salary schedule on the basis of an annual performance evaluation as approved by the City Manager. Nothing herein shall be deemed to impair the City’s authority to revise the salary for the Chief of Police on the City’s salary schedule.

4. Uniform Allowance. Gularte shall receive a payment of Nine Hundred Dollars ($900.00) as an annual uniform allowance.
44 Section 10, Item A
3 5. Use of City Vehicle. In lieu of any monthly automobile allowance that may be authorized by City policy or the City Council, Gularte shall be provided an unmarked City-owned vehicle equipped with emergency equipment for his exclusive use for his duties as Chief of Police and transportation to and from work. Gularte shall not be entitled to reimbursement for automobile use or mileage reimbursement for business travel. City shall pay for the necessary costs of automobile registration, insurance, and maintenance for the City-owned vehicle. Gularte may elect to decline the take-home City-owned vehicle and instead elect to receive any automobile allowance available to the Chief of Police by providing at least thirty (30) days written notice to the City Manager.

6. Health, Retirement, and Other Benefits. City shall provide Gularte and any eligible dependents with the same medical, dental, life, and vision insurance coverage and benefits as are provided other executive management employees of the City, including the City paying the annual premium for a $50,000.00 term life insurance policy covering Gularte during his period of employment with the City as Chief of Police. Gularte shall have the sole discretion in designating any beneficiary(ies) under such life insurance policy. Gularte understands and acknowledges that all such medical, dental, life, and vision insurance coverages and opt-out compensation are subject to change in the future and may be modified from time to time. (a) Opt-Out of Insurance Coverage. Gularte desires to receive City paid employee and eligible dependent dental and vision benefits upon beginning his employment with the City. Gularte may opt out of City paid employee and dependent medical benefits and would receive such opt-out compensation as is available to executive management employees who opt out of City paid medical benefits. Such opt-out compensation shall immediately cease upon Gularte or any of his eligible dependents choosing to become covered or otherwise becoming covered under any City paid medical insurance coverage.
(b) Retirement. City is a CalPERS agency. By reason of his employment with City, if Gularte enters CalPERS as a “classic” member the City shall pay 100% of the employee contribution to CalPERS. By reason of his employment with City, if Gularte enters CalPERS as a “PEPRA” member the City shall pay only 50% of the employee contribution and Gularte shall be responsible for paying the remaining 50% (which may be included as an item in his regular payroll deductions).

7. Vacation, Sick Leave, and Administrative Leave. Upon commencement of employment with the City, Gularte shall immediately begin accruing vacation leave at the same level as employees with ten (10) years of continuous employment with the City; such accrual rate being 160 hours per year. Such advanced accrual placement is for the limited purpose of determining Gularte’s vacation leave accrual rate only, and for no other purpose. Such annual accrual of vacation leave shall continue throughout Gularte’s employment, unless otherwise modified by the parties. Upon commencement of his employment, Gularte shall receive an allocation of 60 hours of vacation leave. Also upon commencement of his employment, Gularte shall receive an allocation of 40 hours of administrative leave for the remaining prorated portion of the 80 hours allocated to department heads of the City for fiscal year 2025-2026 in accordance with the City’s Benefits Resolution No. 2810. Except with respect to the initial placement for vacation leave accrual and the prorated allocation of annual administrative leave, Gularte shall be subject to applicable City ordinances, resolutions, rules and policies pertaining to accrual and use of such leaves by executive management employees as the same currently exist and may hereafter 45 Section 10, Item A
4 be modified.

8. Other Benefits and Entitlements. During the term of this Agreement, Gularte shall be entitled to receive the same benefits, rights, and privileges afforded to executive management employees as approved, and as may be subsequently modified or replaced, by the City Council, and this Agreement is supplemental to such other benefits and entitlements. This Agreement shall control with respect to determining Gularte’s benefits and entitlements if there is any conflict between this Agreement and any City policy, resolution, or ordinance fixing compensation or benefits for executive management employees.

9. Termination.
(a) Termination By City Without Cause. Gularte is an at will employee serving at the pleasure of the City Manager. Gularte’s employment with the City may be terminated for any reason, and at any time without cause upon written notice by the City Manager in accordance with Government Code Section 3304, subd. (c). If terminated without cause, Gularte may agree to waive any right or opportunity for an administrative appeal afforded by Government Code Section 3304, subd. (c) and in return for such waiver the City shall pay Gularte three (3) months’ base salary, less applicable deductions, plus any accrued vacation leave time and accrued administrative leave time as provided herein, and any other payments required to be made under City policies and applicable law. If terminated without cause as provided herein, Gularte shall be entitled to a continuation of the health, dental, and vision insurance coverages and City shall remit its portion of the applicable payment of premiums for such continuing coverage to the City’s insurer or COBRA administrator, as applicable. Gularte may be terminated notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in or arising from any Personnel Policies or past City practices relating to the employment or termination of its employees.
(b) Resignation by Gularte. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with Gularte’s right to voluntarily resign from his employment with the City at any time. Gularte may resign and terminate his employment for any reason, and at any time, with or without cause, by providing the City Manager at least thirty (30) days advance written notice. City shall have the option, in its complete discretion, to make Gularte’s termination effective at any time prior to the end of such advance notice period, provided City pays Gularte all compensation due and owing to him through the last day actually worked, plus an amount equal to the base salary Gularte would have earned through the balance of the advance notice period or thirty (30) days, whichever is less. If Gularte resigns voluntarily (without a request from the City Manager to resign), Gularte shall not be entitled to the severance compensation under Section 9(a) herein, and no severance or any further salary shall be paid to Gularte except as expressly provided in this Section 9(b).
(c) Termination by City for Cause. City may immediately terminate Gularte’s employment and this Agreement at any time by providing Gularte written notice of termination for cause. No severance or any further salary shall be paid in the event Gularte’s employment is terminated for cause except accrued vacation leave time and accrued administrative leave time as provided herein, and any other payments required to be made under City policies and applicable law. For purposes of this Agreement, cause for termination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: theft or attempted theft; 46 Section 10, Item A
5 fraud or other acts of dishonesty; willful or persistent breach of duties; embezzlement, or misuse of public resources; engaging in unlawful discrimination or harassment of employees or any third party while on City premises or time; conviction of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude (offenses contrary to justice, honesty or morality); conviction of a misdemeanor DUI; conviction of a felony; engaging in conduct that brings embarrassment or disrespect to the City; and repeated unauthorized absences.

10. Expense Reimbursement. City shall reimburse Gularte for actual and necessary expenses incurred within the scope of employment in accordance with applicable City reimbursement schedules and policies. Subject to the restrictions on automobile expenses and mileage reimbursement in Section 5 above, City shall pay for or reimburse Gularte’s actual and necessary travel and subsistence expenses for professional and official travel to meetings, courses, seminars, and occasions reasonably necessary to adequately pursue official duties and other functions for the City, and to continue Gularte’s professional development as authorized by the City Manager.

11. Indemnification. Subject to and in accordance with California Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810, et seq.) City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Gularte against any claim or action against him arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the scope of his employment with City, and Gularte shall reasonably cooperate in good faith in the defense. This provision is not intended to and shall not operate to expand the protections afforded to Gularte or the City’s obligations as provided in Government Code section 810 et seq., except that this Section shall operate as Gularte’s standing written request to the City for defense and indemnity as required by Government Code section 825 for any and all claims or action against him arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the scope of his employment with City whether such claim is submitted or action commenced during or after his employment with the City.

12. Notices. Any notices required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally served or shall be sufficiently given and deemed served upon the other party if sent by United State Postal Service, first class postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

Notices shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or upon the date of deposit in the course of transmission with the U.S. Postal Service.

13. Bonding. City shall bear the full cost of any bond(s) or insurance required of Gularte to perform his duties pursuant to this Agreement under any law or ordinance.

14. Dispute Resolution. Any disputes over the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall be submitted to mediation at least thirty (30) days prior to either party filing a claim with the City or any administrative agency or initiating litigation over the dispute. The parties shall mutually agree upon a mediator and share equally in the costs of the mediation. Either TO CITY: Fowler City Manager
City of Fowler
128 S. 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
TO GULARTE: Greg Gularte
Chief of Police
City of Fowler
128 S. 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
47 Section 10, Item A
6 party may initiate mediation by providing written notice to the other party. Mediation shall thereafter be conducted at the soonest feasible time. The parties shall in good faith cooperate in selecting the mediator and scheduling the mediation.

15. Supplemental Agreement. This Agreement is supplemental to the provisions of the Fowler Municipal Code, the City’s Benefits Resolution, and City’s salary schedule for the position of Chief of Police. The applicable provisions of the Fowler Municipal Code, the City’s Benefits Resolution, and the City’s salary schedule shall control over all aspects of the Chief of Police position not addressed by this Agreement.

16. General Provisions.
(a) Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The parties also agree that, in the event of litigation, venue shall be the state courts located in Fresno County, California.
(b) Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the parties. There are no oral understandings, terms, or conditions, and neither party has relied upon any representation, express or implied not contained in this Agreement.
(c) No Assignment. Gularte may not assign or transfer any rights granted or obligations assumed under this Agreement.
(d) Modification. This Agreement cannot be modified, amended, or supplemented orally. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or superseded only by a written instrument executed by both of the parties.
(e) Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provision of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

CITY OF FOWLER CHIEF OF POLICE
By: _______________________________ By: _________________________ Juan Mejia, Mayor Greg Gularte
By: _______________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM Michael Reid, City Manager
_________________________________
Roy Santos, City Attorney
C:\Users\mreid\OneDrive - City of Fowler\Fowler C Drive Backup\City Manager\Interim Police Chief\New Chief's Contract 48 Section 10, Item A

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 6, 2026
FROM: Wyatt Czeshinski, Assistant City Planner
SUBJECT:

1. CONSIDER Resolution No. 2816:
i. FINDING that Planning Project No. 24-27 is
consistent with the City’s General Plan and General
Plan Environmental Impact Report, and is therefore
exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines section 15183, and;
ii. APPROVING Planning Project No. 24-27, subject to
conditions of approval.

2. CONSIDER Resolution No. 2819:
i. FINDING that approval of a Type 20 Alcohol License
for Planning Project No. 24-27 is made on the basis
of such approval is a public convenience or necessity.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Project No. 24-27 (“Project”) proposes a new commercial development that would include a convenience store with a quick serve restaurant (“QSR”), drive through, and a liquor license, a fueling area associated with the convenience store, and a commercial retail tenant space. The proposed liquor license and drive through are permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit (“CUP”). A lot line adjustment (“LLA”) would also be completed as a part of the Project, if the CUP is approved.

BACKGROUND
Paul Archer of Archer Engineering, on behalf of Baleegh Muharram and Dawood Hotar (“Applicant[s]”), has proposed to construct an approximately 6,045 square foot (“sqft”) commercial development, including an approximately 4,545 sqft convenience store with a QSR, an approximately 1,500 sqft commercial tenant space, and a fueling area with six (6) double sided fuel pumps and an approximately 2,592 sqft fuel canopy. The QSR within the convenience store would include the operation of a drive-through that wraps around the proposed building. Additionally, the Project is requesting approval of a Type 20 alcohol license (Off-Sale Beer and Wine). The Project has been proposed on Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 343-350-45 & -46, located at the northwest corner of S. Fowler Avenue and W. Fresno 49 Section 10, Item D
Street (see Attachments 1 and 2) (“Project site”). The Project site is approximately 1.11 acres in size, is zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), and is designated NC (Neighborhood Commercial), by the City of Fowler General Plan. The Project site is currently vacant.

The Project was considered by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on November 6, 2025, where the Planning Commission voted to deny the Project based on traffic and safety concerns. The Applicant submitted a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision and as a result, the City Council may approve, deny, or modify the decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.30.090, subdivision (F).

Consideration of the item by the City Council is considered a de novo (new) hearing and the Planning Commission’s decision shall serve as a recommendation to the City Council.

The Project was considered by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Council on December 2, 2025, where the Council voted to continue the item to the January 6, 2026, meeting of the City Council.

ANALYSIS
Conditional Use Permit
The Project is proposing operational pieces that require the approval of a CUP. Within the C-1 zone district alcohol sales and drive-throughs are all allowed with the approval of a CUP.

Alcohol Sales
While the Project would result in the sale of alcohol, if approved, the use would not be considered a “liquor store”. By definition, the Fowler Zoning Ordinance (“FZO”) defines a “liquor store” as, “Establishments that primarily sell alcoholic beverages, including beer, wine, or liquor, to the public for profit. Liquor stores may include other minor incidental sales” (FZO §

9.240.130).

The alcohol sales proposed by the Project would constitute an incidental use of the development and would not be the primary operating feature of the convenience store.

Currently, the census tract that the Project is located in is allowed five (5) “Off-Sale” (Type 20 and Type 21) alcohol licenses, with six (6) active licenses existing. The addition of an additional license to the census tract would contribute to the oversaturation of the census tract. (See Bus. & Prof. Code § 23817.5.) As a result, the City Council must approve a finding of public convenience or necessity in order for the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control to issue a new Type 20 license for the Project. (See Bus. & Prof. Code § 23817.7.) Should the City Council vote to approve the CUP allowing alcohol sales within the proposed convenience store, the Council would also be required to make a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity in accordance with FZO section 9.205.040 in order for the operation to be able to secure an Off-Sale alcohol license within the underlying census tract from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Lastly, the Project site is not located within 600 feet of a church, school, daycare center, or public park in accordance with FZO section 9.205.050.
50 Section 10, Item D
Drive-through
The Project proposes the operation of a QSR within the convenience store. The QSR would operate a drive-through that would wrap around the proposed building, with one drive-through window proposed. The proposed drive-through would comply with all applicable development standards, including for lighting, noise, and landscaping, as conditioned.

Tobacco Sales
The convenience store proposes selling tobacco products as a part of its operations. Should the Project be approved, the business owner of the convenience store will be required to submit a tobacco retailer license application to the City Manager for review and approval in accordance with Fowler Municipal Code Section 5-20.01 et. seq.

Site Plan
In order for Planning Project No. 24-27 to be considered for approval, a site plan is required to be submitted for review by staff. A site plan was submitted as a part of the Project application, depicting the proposed development and use of the site by the Applicant. As described above, the Project would result in the construction of a new commercial development of approximately 6,045 sqft, including an approximately 4,545 sqft convenience store with a QSR, an approximately 1,500 sqft commercial tenant space, a fueling area with six (6) double sided fuel pumps, and an approximately 2,592 sqft fuel canopy. The Project is also conditioned to add site improvements such as landscaping, parking, and other public infrastructure improvements.

Operations
The Applicant proposes operating hours of 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven (7) days a week for the convenience store, and the fuel pumps would be operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. As discussed above, the convenience store would include alcohol and tobacco sales in addition to the drive-through QSR.

Traffic
A traffic study was prepared for the Project indicating a need for transportation facilities to be improved within the vicinity of the Project site (see Attachment 9). The existing conditions of intersections that could be affected by the Project are provided below, referenced as “Table I” from the traffic study. Below, “Table V” indicates the effects that the Project would have on the existing traffic conditions of affected intersections on the opening day of the Project. 51 Section 10, Item D
As demonstrated by the two tables above, the Project will directly result in the failure of two of the studied intersections on opening day of the Project. The two intersections that would experience failure include the intersection of State Route 99 Southbound Off Ramp and W.

Merced Street, and the intersection of State Route 99 Northbound Ramps and W. Merced Street. The existing Level of Service (“LOS”) levels for the intersections at the Northbound and Southbound ramps are currently D/B and D/C, respectively, during am/pm peak hours. LOS is judged on a scale from A-F, with A being considered generally the best and most efficient LOS, and F being the worst. Generally, an intersection experiencing LOS levels at E and F are considered failing and could pose a threat to the public’s safety. The City’s General Plan Policy MOB-5 specifically encourages LOS "C" throughout the local circulation network. It only permits LOS “D” during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at State Route 99 interchanges where additional improvements are not feasible.

Existing conditions at the subject intersections plus the completion of the Project results in LOS levels of F/C and F/E at the two aforementioned intersections, respectively. This demonstrates that the Project will worsen both intersections to a level of failure without improvements.

Additionally, the traffic study analyzed the cumulative effect of projects in process, plus the Project’s impacts to affected intersections. “Table IX” below shows the cumulative projects and the anticipated LOS for the study intersections in 2046, without the addition of the Project.

Below, “Table X” provides the cumulative effects of projects in process, plus the Project, and the anticipated LOS for the study intersections, indicating that the Project will contribute the future failure of the intersection at W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue. Without the Project, this intersection has a LOS of D/D in 2046, however when considering the inclusion of the Project, the intersection LOS level in 2046 worsens to D/E. 52 Section 10, Item D
With the immediate failure of two intersections connected to State Route 99, and the eventual failure of a third intersection at W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue, the traffic study identifies the need for improvements to be constructed in order to maintain safe circulation throughout the studied intersections. According to “Table XII” of the traffic study, the Project’s fair share contribution towards future roadway improvements is 39.63% at the intersection of State Route 99 Southbound Off Ramp and W. Merced Street; 35.07% at the intersection of State Route 99 Northbound Ramps and W. Merced Street; and 9.49% at the intersection of W.

Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue.
53 Section 10, Item D
The traffic study provides recommended improvements for each of the three intersections that result in failure as a result of the Project. For the two intersections connected to State Route 99 that would experience a failure on the opening day of the Project, the traffic study recommends the installation of traffic signals or the construction of roundabouts for both intersections. The LOS level for the two intersections under traffic signalization would be D/C and B/B, respectively.

However, while signalization would be more cost effective than roundabouts in the short term and would alleviate the immediate failure of the two intersections, City staff and Caltrans do not see this as a long-term solution. These two intersections are located within the Caltrans right of way and any improvements or modifications would require Caltrans oversight and approval. In discussions with Caltrans, the agency has indicated that they view roundabouts as the only true sustainable solution for the two intersections (see Attachment 10). As a result, Caltrans could be unwilling to approve the installation of traffic signals at the two intersections.

If traffic signals were to be installed and as traffic counts continue to increase on the west side of the City as development occurs, roundabouts may still ultimately be required to maintain a LOS consistent with the City’s General Plan. Installation of roundabouts at the two intersections would improve LOS to B/A and A/A, respectively.

As such, staff believe that the proposed roundabouts provide not only the most efficient and safe circulation through the two intersections, as presented by the traffic study, but the roundabouts also serve as the most effective use of City funds if any are contributed to the buildout of this infrastructure. City staff, Caltrans, and the Applicant have discussed the installation of “quick-build” roundabouts to serve the Project on opening day, rather than the full buildout of the two roundabouts prior to opening day of the Project.

A quick-build roundabout would involve the use of non-permanent infrastructure to place a roundabout in the subject intersections. City staff and Caltrans are supportive of the utilization of quick-build roundabouts at the two intersections with the requirement for the full buildout of roundabouts to be the ultimate improvement at the intersections. The Project has therefore been conditioned to construct two quick-build roundabouts at the two intersections to the satisfaction of the City and Caltrans. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, Condition of Approval, No.

53.)
The Project is required to contribute its fair share cost for the construction of two full buildout roundabouts, with the funds from the Project’s contribution being utilized toward the construction of two quick-build roundabouts by the Applicant. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, 54 Section 10, Item D
Condition of Approval, No. 54.) Any required capital above the Applicant’s fair share contribution to construct the two quick-build roundabouts would be initially funded by the Applicant and reimbursed in accordance with a fair share reimbursement agreement with the City. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, Condition of Approval, No. 56.) The City may also approve the use of transportation impact fee dollars to contribute to the costs associated with the required improvements in excess of the Applicant’s fair share contributions. However, any such contribution would be required to be considered and approved by the City Council in the future.

Additionally, because the intersection of W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue would not fail as a result of the Project’s traffic contributions at opening day of the Project, but further into the future, the Project would be required to pay its fair share cost for the required improvements to this intersection. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, Condition of Approval, No. 55.) The traffic study recommends the addition of an eastbound turn lane and the modification of the left-right lane to a “trap” left-turn lane. The Applicant’s fair share amount for these improvements would also be included in the fair share agreement between the Applicant and City.

Parking & Loading
The Project proposes 21 total parking stalls, with one (1) ADA stall being provided (20 total parking spaces are required). Additionally, one loading zone area is provided on site (one [1] required).

Landscaping
The Applicant will be required to submit a landscaping plan to ensure compliance with State water efficient landscaping requirements and the Fowler Zoning Ordinance. Review and approval of the submitted landscape plan and related irrigation plans are required prior to building permit issuance. Standard conditions in regard to landscaping have been imposed on the Project and are contained within the conditions of approval.

Public Infrastructure
The Project would be required to construct or make improvements to existing public infrastructure, such as sidewalk, curb, and gutter, to meet current City standards (as applicable). Two (2) drive approaches are proposed along S. Fowler Avenue, with one drive approach proposed along W. Fresno Street. The southernmost drive approach proposed along S. Fowler Avenue is required to be a right-in, right-out drive approach. Additionally, the existing drive approach along W. Fresno Street would be deconstructed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk built to City standards. The Project would also construct a new trash enclosure to City standards and underground the existing overhead electrical wires located on the southern portion of the Project site. Any sewer connections would be subject to the requirements of the Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler County Sanitation District. Drainage from the Project site would be required to flow into an existing City storm drain basin or be retained on-site.

Lot Line Adjustment
Pursuant to Fowler Subdivision Ordinance Section 107, subdivision (2)(H), the Planning Commission shall consider an LLA between two (2) or more existing adjacent parcels, where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, and where a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created. 55 Section 10, Item D
Due to the Project’s proposed improvements occurring over parcel lines (fuel canopy structure), the Project is required to complete an LLA to merge the two (2) parcels into one (1). An exhibit showing the proposed LLA is attached hereto as Attachment 11.

The Planning Commission voted to deny the entirety of Planning Project No. 24-27 at its November 6, 2025, meeting. As a result, the City Council must consider whether to approve the proposed LLA. Since the LLA would take land from an adjoining parcel and add it to another parcel, and because the LLA would not result in a greater number of parcel than originally existed, staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed LLA.

Appeal
Within the 10-day appeal period following the Planning Commission’s decision, the City received an appeal letter from the Applicant on November 12, 2025 (see Attachment 8). A summary of the appeal letter is provided below.

The Applicant’s appeal is made on the basis of four points, summarized below:
 Denial of the Project was made for reasons not associated with the scope of the CUP request.
 Denial of the Project was based on public concerns of the Project which would be allowed to be approved by right.
 The Planning Commission denied the proposed LLA, which is required for the project whether the operational components requiring a CUP are approved or not. Should the Project be denied the components of the operation requiring the CUP, approval of the LLA by the Planning Commission would still be required.  Concerns of the Planning Commission in regard to traffic were mitigated by conditions of approval placed on the Project. The Planning Commission’s concerns also emphasized the aesthetics of the required roundabouts, rather than the effectiveness of their deployment.

Staff recommend that the City Council deny the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and approve Planning Project No. 24-27 as originally conditioned and recommended by staff.

Conditional Use Permit Findings (FZO § 9.35.070)
Prior to approving an application for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall make all of the following findings:

1. That the proposed design and location of the conditional use is consistent with the adopted General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The proposed Project would result in the construction of a commercial development that would meet the development standards in the underlying C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone district. The Project is also consistent with the site’s General Plan land use designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial). The Project, as conditioned, would not conflict with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. 56 Section 10, Item D

2. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required by the Zoning Ordinance.

As conditioned, the Project meets all applicable requirements for yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, and landscaping. The Project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use.

3. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use, consistent with the mobility goals of the City.

As is discussed in detail throughout the “Traffic” subsection of this staff report, the Project results in the immediate failure of the intersection of State Route 99 Southbound Off Ramp and W. Merced Street, and the intersection of State Route 99 Northbound Ramps and W. Merced Street on opening day of the Project. The Project also contributes to the future failure of the intersection of W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue. In order to maintain safe and efficient traffic levels within the vicinity of the Project site and the intersections studied as a part of the Project’s traffic study, transportation infrastructure improvements have been conditioned on the Project, including the construction of two (2) quick-build roundabouts and the payment of fair share costs to the future infrastructure improvements at the intersection of W. Fresno Street and S. Fowler Avenue. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, Conditions of Approval, Nos. 53-55.)
In order for the improvements to be constructed, the Applicant has been conditioned to enter into a fair share reimbursement agreement with the City for the Applicant to be reimbursed for any costs associated with the required improvements in excess of the Applicant’s fair share percentage for each of the three intersections where a fair share contribution is required. (See Ex. “A” to Res. No. 2816, Condition of Approval, No. 56.) The requirement for the construction of two quick-build roundabouts, rather than traffic signalization, is a result of coordination with Caltrans and is the position of both Caltrans and City staff that roundabouts are the most sustainable and cost effective means for addressing circulation issues in the long term.

Without the improvements as conditioned, the Project would be in conflict with the City’s General Plan (Policy MOB-5) and would put the City’s residents at potential risk due to unsafe traffic conditions resulting from lengthy queuing lengths on the southbound and northbound off ramps of State Route 99 onto W. Merced Street. Imposition of the conditions related to transportation infrastructure improvements are necessary to protect not only those utilizing the subject intersections to enter and leave the City via State Route 99, but also those residents of the City circulating from the portion of the City on the west side of State Route 99 to the eastern side of State Route 99, including trips to each of the City’s existing schools on the eastern side of the City. With the improvements as conditioned, the Project is adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use, consistent with the mobility goals of the City.

4. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof.
57 Section 10, Item D
The Project would operate a use that is allowed within the underlying C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone district. Additionally, the Project has been conditioned in order to ensure that significant adverse effects on abutting properties and their respective use(s) do not occur. Conditions of approval are based upon the City’s Zoning Ordinance, City standards, and are imposed to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public.

5. That the conditions stated in the resolution are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.

The Project has been appropriately conditioned in order to protect the public’s health, safety, and general welfare. Conditions of approval for the Project are contained as Exhibit “A” of the attached Resolution No. 2816. All appropriate findings for the approval of the CUP could not be made without the conditions of approval imposed on the Project and attached to Resolution No. 2816 as Exhibit “A”.

Public Convenience or Necessity Findings (FZO § 9.205.040) Prior to making a determination that an additional Type 20 alcohol license should be approved, the following findings must be made:

A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Fowler Zoning Ordinance.

The sale of alcohol within a convenience store is an allowed use, with approval of a CUP, in the C-1 zone district, where the Project site is located. The C-1 zone district is consistent with the Project site’s Neighborhood Commercial General Plan land use designation. As a result, the use is consistent with both the General Plan and the FZO.

B. The proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and character of adjacent land uses.

The proposed use is allowed with the approval of a CUP in the C-1 zone district. Similar establishments exist within 1,000 feet of the Project site. While the Project site abuts residential land uses, an existing block wall separates the residential land uses from the commercial property that this Project would be developed upon. Additionally, the C-1 zone district is intended to provide neighborhood serving commercial uses in proximity to residential uses. As a result, the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and character of the adjacent land uses.

C. The proposed use would not have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses.

The proposed use would be established consistent with the development standards of the C-1 zone district and is conditioned to prevent any adverse effects on adjacent land uses.

D. The proposed use would not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity.
58 Section 10, Item D
Of the (6) existing Off-Sale licenses existing in the census tract, five (5) are located within the City of Fowler. Four (4) of those five (5) existing licenses within the City are located on the east side of State Route 99, while one (1) is located on the west side of State Route 99 (see Attachment 5). Limited commercially zoned property exists on the west side of State Route 99 in comparison to the existing residential development.

While the Project would add another Off-Sale alcohol license approximately 1,000 feet from the existing license on the western side of the City, it would not result in an excessive amount of similar establishments in this area of the City.

E. The proposed use will be essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare and will not impair the integrity and character of the zone district or be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare.

One (1) of the five (5) Off-Sale alcohol licenses existing within the City limits is located on the west side of State Route 99. An additional Type 20 alcohol license on the western side of State Route 99 would not impair the integrity or character of the zone district, nor would it be detrimental to the public’s health, safety or general welfare, as conditioned.

F. Notice of hearing, if applicable, shall be given to all owners of property in the same manner as required by the related permit.

Property owners within 300 feet of the Project site and within 300 feet of the conceptual roundabout locations were sent notices of the Project via U.S. Mail on November 21, 2025, notifying them of the potential for a use involving alcohol sales to be approved.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Business Journal on November 21, 2025, which is at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Notice of the December 2, 2025, public hearing was also sent via U.S. Mail to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed Project on November 21, 2025. Additionally, property owners within 300 feet of the conceptual roundabout locations were sent notices of the public hearing via U.S. Mail on November 21, 2025, notifying them of the Project.
59 Section 10, Item D

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The first step in complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) is to determine whether the activity in question constitutes a “project” as defined by CEQA (Pub.

Res. Code § 21000, et seq.; Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 14, § 15000, et seq. [“CEQA Guidelines”].) This Project qualifies as a project under CEQA because it involves the issuance of a “lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use” as described in CEQA Guidelines section 15378, subdivision (a)(3).

The second step is to determine whether the project is subject to or exempt from CEQA. The Project would result in the construction of a new commercial development on a site that is planned and zoned for such uses. The Project aligns with the site’s NC (Neighborhood Commercial) General Plan land use designation and is consistent with the City’s General Plan Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15183.

To assess any project-specific effects of the Project, an air quality analysis was run for the Project, indicating that during operations, the Project is expected to result in a generation of 2,780 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent annually (see Attachment 12). This exceeds the applicable threshold of 1,100 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent per year. The City, in its General Plan Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”), adopted mitigation measures aimed at reducing potentially significant effects from the generation of greenhouse gasses. As a result, the Project could be considered consistent with the General Plan EIR if it complies with these mitigation measures. Accordingly, these mitigation measures have been made a condition of approval for the Project.

Additionally, in order to confirm that the Project would not result in a noise impact to the surrounding neighborhood, an acoustical analysis was performed (see Attachment 13). The analysis found that no significant impact would be created from development of the Project as proposed.

The City’s General Plan EIR considers the buildout of land uses identified within the General Plan. However, it did not analyze the development of infrastructure improvements such as those conditioned to be constructed as a part of the Project (i.e., the roundabouts). The construction of the conditioned infrastructure would not result in any significant environmental impacts as the areas that would undergo these improvements are largely already developed.

During construction of these improvements, circulation and emergency access may be impacted, alternate routes would be identified, and detours would be identified. Impacts would not rise to the level that would be considered significant in nature.

Accordingly, staff recommend that the City Council find that the Project is absolved from further environmental analysis, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183. If the Project is approved, a Notice of Determination for the Project will be filed with the County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action (as specifically conditioned) is consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:
60 Section 10, Item D
General Plan Goal LU-1
Growth occurs logically and efficiently.

General Plan Goal LU-3
Thriving commercial centers are located throughout the City.

General Plan Policy LU-1
Development shall occur in accordance with the planned land uses as shown on Figure 4-1:

Land Use Diagram.

General Plan Policy LU-19
Support neighborhood-serving commercial uses located near residential development with strong connectivity through walkable infrastructure.

General Plan Policy CDES-6
Require site plan review for all multifamily, commercial, and industrial development, to ensure consistency with all applicable development standards. Require project design to respond to site features.

General Plan Policy CDES-15
Locate parking areas within commercial projects in a manner that promotes pedestrian activity, connectivity, and amenities. Commercial loading areas and passenger drop-off and pick-up areas should also be considered in commercial site design.

General Plan Policy CDES-20
A minimum of 10% of the total surface area of all commercial developments shall be landscaped.

General Plan Policy OS-20
Require the planting of shade trees with substantial canopies within private development.

General Plan Policy OS-25
Trees shall be planted within parking lots such that a minimum of 50% of the paved area is shaded by tree canopies within 10 years of planting.

General Plan Goal MOB-3
Goods movement throughout the planning area is efficient and safe.

General Plan Goal MOB-4
The circulation system is adequately maintained.

General Plan Goal MOB-5
Safe, well-designed, multi-modal connections exist across State Route 99, Golden State Boulevard, and the Union Pacific Railroad.

General Plan Policy MOB-5
Encourage a Level of Service (LOS) "C" throughout the local circulation network. LOS “D” may be allowed during peak hours at intersections of major streets, at State Route 99 interchanges, and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible. LOS “D” may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity. 61 Section 10, Item D
LOS “E” may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized.

General Plan Policy MOB-13
Coordinate with Caltrans, Fresno Council of Governments (COG), Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA), and other responsible agencies to identify the need for additional mobility infrastructure and/or services along major commuter travel corridors.

General Plan Policy MOB-20
Encourage the efficient movement of goods.

General Plan Policy MOB-21
Facilitate goods movement and delivery through internal site design of commercial and industrial areas.

General Plan Policy ED-5
Discourage passive land uses, underutilization of land, and vacant structures on available commercial sites.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project would result in the collection of development impact fees in accordance with the most current development impact fee schedule at the time that the Project application was received by the City. Additionally, the Project would require the construction of off-site improvements in the form of two quick-build roundabouts along W. Merced Street on each side of State Route 99. While the Project would contribute its fair share of the cost towards the construction of those two roundabouts, the City may choose to contribute traffic impact funds towards the completion of both roundabouts. Any contribution of funds to the completion of this infrastructure would have to be considered by the City Council subsequent to the approval of the Project. The Project will be conditioned to enter into a fair share reimbursement agreement with the City for the required infrastructure improvements.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
Approval of the Project does not require any City procurement.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflict of interest.

Attachments
- Attachment 1: Regional Vicinity Map
- Attachment 2: Aerial Map
- Attachment 3: General Plan Land Use Map
- Attachment 4: Zoning Map
- Attachment 5: Alcohol License Map
- Attachment 6: Plan Set
- Attachment 7: Operational Statement
- Attachment 8: Applicant Appeal Letter
62 Section 10, Item D
- Attachment 9: Traffic Study
- Attachment 10: Caltrans Comment Letter
- Attachment 11: Lot Line Adjustment Exhibits
- Attachment 12: CalEEMod Output Files
- Attachment 13: Acoustical Analysis
- Attachment 14: Resolution No. 2816 – Approval
- Attachment 15: Resolution No. 2819 – Approval
- Attachment 16: Resolution No. 2819 – Denial
63 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 1: Regional Vicinity Map
64 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 2: Aerial Map
65 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 3: General Plan Lan Use Map
66 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 4: Zoning Map
67 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 5: Alcohol License Map
68 Section 10, Item D
Attachment 6: Plan Set
69 Section 10, Item D
70 Section 10, Item D
71 Section 10, Item D
Fowler Ave and Fresno St Convenience Store and Gas Station Operational Statement
Business Overview
Our gas station and convenience store aim to provide high-quality fuel and a wide range of essential products to travelers and the local community. We are committed to delivering exceptional customer service, maintaining a safe and clean environment, and ensuring that our facilities operate efficiently and profitably.

Hours of Operation
The gas station will operate 24/7 to accommodate drivers at all hours. The convenience store will be open from 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM daily, with a focus on peak traffic times for maximum convenience to customers.

Convenience Store Operations
• The store will offer a variety of products, including snacks, beverages, tobacco products, automotive supplies, and basic groceries.
• Inventory will be managed using a point-of-sale (POS) system for real-time tracking and to ensure that popular items are always in stock.
• Regular promotions will be run to encourage sales, including combo deals on fuel and store products.
• We will maintain high standards of cleanliness, with regular sanitation of the store, particularly in high-touch areas.

Staffing and Management
• The convenience store will have 2-3 employees on shift during operational hours, ensuring customer assistance and restocking duties are handled efficiently. • Management will oversee day-to-day operations, monitor inventory levels, handle customer complaints, and ensure compliance with local and state regulations.

Attachment 7: Operational Statement
72 Section 10, Item D
November 12, 2025
Attn: Director of Community & Economic Development
City of Fowler
128 S. 5th Street
Fowler, California 93625
Re: Notice of Appeal – Planning Commission Action on Resolution No. 726 Planning Commission Meeting Date: November 6, 2025
Application/File No.: Planning Project No. 24-27
Appellant: Paul Archer of Archer Engineering, on behalf of Baleegh Muharram and Dawood Hotar
Mr. Flood,
Pursuant to Fowler Municipal Code Section 9.30.090(C), I hereby appeal the Planning Commission’s decision on the above-referenced project to the City Council of the City of Fowler.

This appeal is being submitted within ten (10) calendar days of the Planning Commission’s action, together with the applicable fees of $630 (appeal fee) and $300 (public noticing cost).

Specific Condition, Standard, or Action Being Appealed
Denial of Resolution No. 726 and all applicable Findings and Conditions.

Basis for Appeal

1. Denial Contrary to Staff Recommendation and Conditional Use Permit Scope The Planning Commission denied the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the drivethrough and sale of alcohol, despite staff’s recommendation for approval. The CUP was specifically for these operational elements; the underlying gas station/convenience store use is permitted by right on the property. The Commission’s denial was based on general opposition to a gas station, not the CUP-specific issues, which is outside the intended scope of review under Fowler Municipal Code § 9.35.070.

2. Public Testimony Misfocused on General Project Features Comments from the public during the hearing expressed opposition to the project as a whole — including traffic, the presence of a gas station, and general concerns about oversaturation of commercial uses. However, these concerns do not apply to the CUP, which only governs the drive-through and alcohol sales. The Planning Commission appears to have conflated general opposition with the CUP review, giving the appearance Attachment 8: Applicant Appeal Letter
73 Section 10, Item D
of denying elements that are otherwise permitted by right. This is clear, as further conversation between members of the public and the applicant reflects this misunderstanding.

3. Lot Line Adjustment Denial Was Unwarranted
The Planning Commission denied the required Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) as part of their action. While an LLA is subject to discretionary review to ensure compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance, the denial in this case appears to have been driven by general opposition to the overall project rather than any legitimate issue with the adjustment itself. The LLA is necessary to merge the two parcels to accommodate the approved development, and there were no technical or regulatory grounds cited that would justify denying it.

4. Traffic and Operational Concerns Already Mitigated in Staff Conditions Traffic impacts and operational issues cited by the Commission were addressed in staff’s recommended conditions, including fair-share contributions to infrastructure improvements (roundabouts, lane modifications). The Commission’s denial appears to ignore these mitigations, despite them adequately addressing mobility and public safety concerns consistent with General Plan Policies MOB-5 and MOB-13.

The Planning Commissioners seemed to emphasize how a roundabout would look or be used, rather than the general traffic impacts created by the project. However, this mitigation strategy was not initiated by the applicant, but rather Caltrans and the City of Fowler.

Summary of Appeal Grounds
The appeal is based on the following key points:
• The Planning Commission denied the CUP and LLA for reasons outside the scope of the CUP review.
• Public opposition was misdirected at project elements already allowed by right. • Staff conditions sufficiently mitigate traffic and operational impacts. • Denying the LLA is procedurally unfair and unnecessary.

Requested Action
That the City Council accept the appeal and approve Resolution No. 726.

Sincerely,
Paul Archer
74 Section 10, Item D
Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Fowler Commercial
Located on the Northwest Corner of
Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street
In the City of Fowler, California
Prepared for
Archer Engineering
15927 Cusano Plaza
Bakersfield, CA 93314
Project No. 042-004
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, & Parking Solutions 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93710
Phone: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
Attachment 9: Traffic Study
75 Section 10, Item D
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, & Parking Solutions 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Phone: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, & Parking Solutions Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\Report\R20250711 Fowler Commercial TIA Report.docx Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report
For Fowler Commercial located on the Northwest Corner of Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street
In the City of Fowler, California
July 11, 2025
This Traffic Impact Analysis Report has been prepared under the direction of a licensed Traffic Engineer. The licensed Traffic Engineer attests to the technical information contained therein and has judged the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data from which recommendations, conclusions and decisions are based.

Prepared by:
_________________________________
Jose Luis Benavides, PE, TE
President
76 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | iii
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table of Contents
Introduction and Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Traffic Conditions........................................................................................................................ 1 Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................... 1 Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 2 Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................... 2 Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................. 2 Queuing Analysis...................................................................................................................................... 2 Project’s Equitable Fair Share .................................................................................................................. 2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Study Facilities ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Scenarios............................................................................................................................................ 4 Existing Traffic Conditions........................................................................................................................ 4 Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................... 4 Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 4 Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................... 4 Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................. 4 LOS Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 5 LOS Thresholds ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Operational Analysis Assumptions and Defaults ..................................................................................... 6 Existing Traffic Conditions....................................................................................................................... 7 Roadway Network........................................................................................................................................ 7 Traffic Signal Warrants................................................................................................................................. 8 Results of Existing Level of Service Analysis................................................................................................. 8 Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................. 11 Project Description..................................................................................................................................... 11 Project Access ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Trip Generation.......................................................................................................................................... 11 Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Bikeways..................................................................................................................................................... 13 77 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | iv
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Walkways................................................................................................................................................... 13 Transit ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Roadway Network...................................................................................................................................... 14 Traffic Signal Warrants............................................................................................................................... 14 Results of Existing plus Project Level of Service Analysis........................................................................... 14 Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 21 Description of Near Term Projects............................................................................................................. 21 Roadway Network...................................................................................................................................... 21 Traffic Signal Warrants............................................................................................................................... 21 Results of Near Term plus Project Level of Service Analysis...................................................................... 22 Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions.............................................................................. 26 Description of 2046 Cumulative Projects................................................................................................... 26 Roadway Network...................................................................................................................................... 26 Traffic Signal Warrants............................................................................................................................... 26 Results of Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Level of Service Analysis ..................................................... 27 Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................ 31 Roadway Network...................................................................................................................................... 31 Traffic Signal Warrants............................................................................................................................... 31 Results of Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Level of Service Analysis ................................................... 31 Queuing Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 35 Project’s Pro-Rata Fair Share of Future Transportation Improvements.................................................. 38 Conclusions and Recommendations...................................................................................................... 40 Existing Traffic Conditions...................................................................................................................... 40 Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................. 40 Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................................. 41 Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions............................................................................. 42 Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions........................................................................... 43 Queuing Analysis.................................................................................................................................... 44 Project’s Equitable Fair Share ................................................................................................................ 44 Study Participants................................................................................................................................. 45 References............................................................................................................................................ 46 78 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | v
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
List of Figures Figure 1: Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 2: Existing - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls............................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Project Site Plan..................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4: Project Only Trips (Before Pass-By) ........................................................................................................ 17 Figure 5: Pass-By Reductions................................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 6: Project Only Trips (After Pass-By)........................................................................................................... 19 Figure 7: Existing plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls............................................................ 20 Figure 8: Near Term Projects' Trip Assignment...................................................................................................... 24 Figure 9: Near Term plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls........................................................ 25 Figure 10: 2046 Cumulative Projects' Trip Assignment .......................................................................................... 29 Figure 11: Cumulative Year 2046 No Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls....................................... 30 Figure 12: Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls..................................... 34 List of Tables Table I: Existing Intersection LOS Results................................................................................................................ 8 Table II: Project Trip Generation (Before Pass-By)................................................................................................. 12 Table III: Pass-By Reductions................................................................................................................................ 12 Table IV: Net Project Trip Generation (After Pass-By)............................................................................................ 12 Table V: Existing plus Project Intersection LOS Results.......................................................................................... 15 Table VI: Near Term Projects’ Trip Generation...................................................................................................... 21 Table VII: Near Term plus Project Intersection LOS Results ................................................................................... 23 Table VIII: 2046 Cumulative Projects’ Trip Generation .......................................................................................... 26 Table IX: Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Intersection LOS Results..................................................................... 28 Table X: Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Intersection LOS Results.................................................................... 33 Table XI: Queuing Analysis................................................................................................................................... 36 Table XII: Project’s Fair Share of Future Roadway Improvements.......................................................................... 39 List of Appendices Appendix A: Scope of Work
Appendix B: Traffic Counts
Appendix C: Traffic Modeling
Appendix D: Methodology
Appendix E: Existing Traffic Conditions
Appendix F: Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
Appendix G: Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
Appendix H: Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions Appendix I: Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions Appendix J: Traffic Signal Warrants
79 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 1
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Introduction and Summary
Introduction
This Report describes a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. (JLB) for the Fowler Commercial (Project) located on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street in the City of Fowler. The Project proposes to construct a 4,545 square-foot convenience market with 12 fueling positions and a 1,500 square-foot restaurant. Based on data provided to JLB, the proposed Project is consistent with the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan. Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed Project site relative to the surrounding roadway network.

The purpose of the TIA is to evaluate the potential on-site and off-site traffic impacts, identify short-term and long-term roadway and circulation needs, determine potential roadway improvement measures and identify any critical traffic issues that should be addressed in the on-going planning process. The TIA primarily focused on evaluating traffic conditions at study intersections that may potentially be impacted by the proposed Project. The Scope of Work was prepared via consultation with City of Fowler, Caltrans and County of Fresno staff.

Summary
The potential traffic impacts of the proposed Project were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by the Level of Service (LOS) policies of the City of Fowler, County of Fresno and Caltrans.

Existing Traffic Conditions
• At present, all study intersections operate at an acceptable LOS during both peak periods.

Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
• JLB analyzed the location of the existing and proposed roadways and access points relative to those in the vicinity of the Project site. A review of the existing and proposed roadways and access points indicates that they are located at points that minimize traffic operational impacts to existing and future roadway networks.
• Prior to pass-by reductions, the proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 3,762 daily trips, 389 AM peak hour trips and 323 PM peak hour trips. • Pass-by reductions are estimated to reduce the trip generation by 563 daily trips, 58 AM peak hour trips and 48 PM peak hour trips.
• The net new trip generation, after pass-by reductions, is estimated to be 3,199 daily trips, 331 AM peak hour trips and 275 PM peak hour trips.
• It is recommended that the Project retain the existing Class II bikeway along its frontage to Fowler Avenue.
• It is recommended that the Project retain the existing pedestrian sidewalks along its frontages to Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street.
80 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 2
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements. Additional details as to the recommended improvements for these intersections are presented later in this Report.

Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
• The total trip generation for the Near Term Projects is 3,782 daily trips, 281 AM peak hour trips and 377 PM peak hour trips.
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements. Additional details as to the recommended improvements for these intersections are presented later in this Report.

Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions
• The total trip generation for the 2046 Cumulative Projects is 9,685 daily trips, 719 AM peak hour trips and 966 PM peak hour trips.
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements. Additional details as to the recommended improvements for these intersections are presented later in this Report.

Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street and Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements. Additional details as to the recommended improvements for these intersections are presented later in this Report.

Queuing Analysis
• It is recommended that the City consider left-turn and right-turn lane storage lengths as indicated in the Queuing Analysis.

Project’s Equitable Fair Share
• It is recommended that the Project contribute its equitable Fair Share for those future improvements which are not covered by an existing impact fee program or grant funds. 81 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 3
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Scope of Work
The TIA focuses on evaluating traffic conditions at study intersections that may potentially be impacted by the proposed Project. On February 12, 2025, a Draft Scope of Work for the preparation of a TIA for this Project was provided to the City of Fowler, County of Fresno and Caltrans staff for their review and comment.

On March 5, 2025, the County of Fresno replied to the Draft Scope of Work stating that they had no comments. On March 5, 2025, Caltrans replied to the Draft Scope of Work stating that they had no comments. On March 17, 2025, the City of Fowler requested that the TIA include the intersection of Golden State Boulevard at Merced Street and a Cumulative Year 2046 No Project scenario.

Based on comments received, this TIA includes the intersection of Golden State Boulevard at Merced Street and a Cumulative Year 2046 No Project scenario. The Draft Scope of Work and the comments received from the lead agency and responsible agencies are included in Appendix A.

Study Facilities
The existing intersection peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections in February 2025 and March 2025, while schools in the vicinity of the Project site were in session. The intersection turning movement counts include pedestrian and bicycle volumes. The traffic counts for the existing study intersections are contained in Appendix B. The existing intersection turning movement volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls are illustrated in Figure 2.

Study Intersections

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street

3. Golden State Boulevard / Merced Street

4. Fowler Avenue / Fresno Street

5. Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp
82 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 4
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Study Scenarios
Existing Traffic Conditions
This scenario evaluates the Existing Traffic Conditions based on existing traffic volumes and roadway conditions from traffic counts and field surveys conducted in February 2025 and March 2025.

Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions. The Existing plus Project traffic volumes were obtained by adding the Project Only Trips to the Existing Traffic Conditions scenario. The Project Only Trips to the study facilities were developed based on existing travel patterns, the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) Project Select Zone, the existing roadway network, data provided by the developer, knowledge of the study area, engineering judgment, existing residential densities and the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan Circulation Element in the vicinity of the Project site. The Fresno COG ABM plots are contained in Appendix C.

Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions. The Near Term plus Project traffic volumes were obtained by adding the Near Term related trips to the Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario.

Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions
This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions. The Cumulative Year 2046 No Project traffic volumes were obtained by using a combination of the Fresno COG activity-based model (ABM) (Base Year 2019 and Cumulative Year 2046) and existing traffic counts. Under this scenario, the increment method, as recommended by the Model Steering Committee was utilized to determine the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project traffic volumes. This increment was interpolated to account for a base year of 2025. The Fresno COG ABM plots are contained in Appendix C.

Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions
This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions. The Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project traffic volumes were obtained by adding the Project Only Trips to the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions scenario. The Project Only Trips to the study facilities were developed based on existing travel patterns, the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) Project Select Zone, the existing roadway network, data provided by the developer, knowledge of the study area, engineering judgment, existing residential densities and the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan Circulation Element in the vicinity of the Project site. The Fresno COG ABM plots are contained in Appendix C.
83 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 5
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
LOS Methodology
LOS is a qualitative index of the performance of an element of the transportation system. LOS is a rating scale running from “A” to “F”, with “A” indicating no congestion of any kind and “F” indicating unacceptable congestion and delays. LOS in this study describes the operating conditions for signalized and unsignalized intersections.

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition is the standard reference published by the Transportation Research Board and contains the specific criteria and methods to be used in assessing LOS. Synchro software was used to define LOS in this study. Details regarding these calculations are included in Appendix D.

While LOS is no longer the criteria of significance for traffic impacts in the state of California, the City of Fowler continues to apply congestion-related conditions or requirements for land development projects through planning approval processes outside of CEQA guidelines in order to continue the implementation of City of Fowler 2040 General Plan policies.

LOS Thresholds
The City of Fowler 2040 General Plan has established LOS C as the acceptable level of traffic congestion on most intersections and road segments for minor collectors, collectors, arterials, major arterials and highways within the City of Fowler. Per the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan, LOS D may be acceptable during the peak hours at intersections of major streets, State Route 99 interchanges and along street segments where additional improvements are not feasible. In this TIA, intersections of major streets with State Route 99 interchanges utilize the LOS threshold for State Route 99 in this area. Furthermore, LOS D may also be allowed along streets with the potential for a high level of pedestrian and bicyclist activity.

LOS E may be permitted during peak hour use of certain road intersections and segments where pedestrian and bicycle activity is prioritized. Therefore, the City of Fowler LOS C and D thresholds, as appropriate, are used to evaluate the potential significance of LOS impacts to study facilities within the City of Fowler Sphere of Influence (SOI).

The Fresno County General Plan has established LOS C as the acceptable level of traffic congestion on all county roads and streets that fall entirely outside the Sphere of Influence (SOI) of a City. (Fresno County, 2024). For those areas that fall within the SOI of a City, the LOS threshold of the city is used in this Report.

LOS C is used to evaluate the potential LOS impacts to Fresno County intersections and segments that fall outside the City of Fowler SOI. In this case, all study intersections fall within the City of Fowler or Caltrans SOI.

Caltrans no longer considers delay as a significant impact to the environment for land use projects and plans. According to Caltrans’ VMT Focused Transportation Impact Study Guidelines dated May 2020, Caltrans review of land use projects and plans is focused on a VMT metric consistent with CEQA. In this TIA, the study intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street and State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp at Fowler Avenue fall within Caltrans SOI. According to the Transportation Concept Report (TCR) for State Route 99, the concept LOS at this segment of State Route 99 is LOS D.
84 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 6
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Operational Analysis Assumptions and Defaults
The following operational analysis values, assumptions and defaults were used in this study to ensure a consistent analysis of LOS among the various scenarios. • The intersection of Golden State Boulevard at Merced Street utilizes Signal Timing Plans provided by the City of Fowler.
• Any recommended traffic signals utilized the following assumptions:
o Yellow time consistent with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) based on approach speeds with a minimum of 3.5 seconds (Caltrans, 2021) o All-red clearance intervals of 1.0 second for all phases o Walk intervals of 7.0 seconds
o Flashing Don’t Walk based on 3.5 feet/second walking speed with yellow plus all-red clearance subtracted
• The number of observed pedestrians at existing intersections was utilized under all study scenarios • A 3 percent HVF, or the existing HVF if higher, was utilized under all study scenarios • An average of 10 pedestrian calls per hour at signalized study intersections • The observed Peak Hour Factor (PHF) is utilized in the Existing, Existing plus Project and Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions scenarios.
• Under the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project and Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions scenarios, a PHF of 0.92 is utilized during both peak periods. 85 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 7
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Existing Traffic Conditions
Roadway Network
The Project site and surrounding study area are illustrated in Figure 1. Important roadways serving the Project are discussed below.

Fowler Avenue is an existing north-south two-lane undivided adjacent to the proposed Project site. Fowler Avenue extends though the City of Fowler planning area north to the City of Fresno and south to the census-designated place of Laton. Within the City of Fowler planning area, Fowler Avenue is a two-lane undivided collector between Lincoln Avenue and Adams Avenue and a two-lane undivided arterial between Merced Street and Parlier Avenue.

Sumner Avenue is an existing east-west two-lane undivided collector in the vicinity of the proposed Project site. Sumner Avenue is a two-lane undivided collector between Kenneth Avenue and Fowler Avenue and a two-lane undivided local roadway between 5th Street and Christopher Court.

Fresno Street is an existing northeast-southwest (diagonal) collector adjacent to the proposed Project Site.

Fresno Street is a two-lane undivided collector between Stanford Avenue and Fowler Avenue, a two-lane undivided local roadway between 10th Street and 5th Street with a break at Golden State Boulevard and a two-lane undivided collector between 5th Street and 2nd Street. In this TIA, Fresno Street is considered an east-west roadway at the intersection of Fowler Avenue at Fowler Avenue.

Merced Street is an existing northeast-southwest (diagonal) collector in the vicinity of the proposed Project Site. Merced Street is a two-lane collector between Fowler Avenue and Adams Avenue. In this TIA, Merced Street is considered an east-west roadway at the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound OffRamp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street.

Golden State Boulevard is an existing northwest-southeast (diagonal) expressway in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Golden State Boulevard is a four-lane expressway through the City of Fowler. In this TIA, Golden State Boulevard is considered a north-south roadway.

State Route 99 is an existing six-lane freeway in the vicinity of the proposed Project. State Route 99 traverses the County of Fresno and through the City of Fowler in a northwest-southeast direction and serves as the principal connection to various metropolitan areas within the Central San Joaquin Valley. The Caltrans TCR for State Route 99 classifies State Route 99 between State Route 43 and the Fresno County border as a freeway. According to the TCR for State Route 99, the threshold for this segment of State Route 99 is LOS D.
86 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 8
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Traffic Signal Warrants
The CA MUTCD indicates that an engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics and physical features of an intersection shall be conducted to determine whether installation of traffic signal controls are justified. The CA MUTCD provides a total of nine (9) warrants to evaluate the need for traffic signal controls. These warrants include 1) Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume, 2) Four-Hour Vehicular Volume, 3) Peak Hour, 4) Pedestrian Volume, 5) School Crossing, 6) Coordinated Signal System, 7) Crash Experience, 8) Roadway Network and 9) Intersection Near a Grade Crossing. Signalization of an intersection may be appropriate if one or more of the signal warrants is satisfied. However, the CA MUTCD also states that “[t]he satisfaction of a signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal” (Caltrans, 2021).

If traffic signal warrants are satisfied when a LOS threshold impact is identified at an unsignalized intersection, then installation of a traffic signal control may serve as an improvement measure. For instances where traffic signal warrants are satisfied, a traffic signal control is not considered to be the default improvement measure. Prior to assuming that an intersection will be signalized, an attempt is made to improve the intersection approach lane geometrics in order to improve its LOS while maintaining the existing intersection controls. If the additional lanes did not result in acceptable LOS at the intersection, then in those cases implementation of a traffic signal control would be considered.

Warrant 3 was prepared for the unsignalized intersections under the Existing Traffic Conditions scenario.

These warrants are contained in Appendix J. At present, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street satisfy Warrant 3 during both peak periods. Based on the operational analysis and engineering judgement, it is not recommended that any of the unsignalized study intersections be signalized.

Results of Existing Level of Service Analysis
Figure 2 illustrates the Existing Traffic Conditions traffic volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls. LOS worksheets for the Existing Traffic Conditions scenario are provided in Appendix E. Table I presents a summary of the Existing peak hour LOS at the study intersections.

At present, all study intersections operate at an acceptable LOS during both peak periods.

Table I: Existing Intersection LOS Results
ID Intersection Intersection Control
AM (7 - 9)
Peak Hour
PM (4 - 6)
Peak Hour
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street All-Way Stop 25.6 D 14.7 B 2 State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street Two-Way Stop 25.5 D 21.1 C 3 Golden State Boulevard Street / Merced Street Traffic Signal 19.0 B 18.5 B 4 Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue Two-Way Stop 14.5 B 14.2 B 5 Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp Two-Way Stop 10.4 B 10.4 B Note: LOS = Level of Service based on average delay on signalized intersections and All-Way STOP Controls LOS for two-way and one-way STOP controlled intersections are based on the worst approach/movement of the minor street. 87 Section 10, Item D
042-004 - 04/21/2025 - DC
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

ADAMS AVE

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
88 Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Existing - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls
Figure 2
042-004 - 05.16.2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
226(118)
29(41)
216(230)
104(152)
7(19)
333(217)
15(36)95(118)209(163)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
179(143)
567(355)
302(342)
154(217)
23(44)
2(1)
143(90) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
108(46)
10(11)
2(4)
246(187)
47(68)265(371) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
93(139)
173(242)
252(190)
30(21)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
45(24)
325(219)
127(107)
18(23)
288(216)
13(9)
103(100)301(183)
22(25)
70(41)130(292)8(15) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
= STOP SIGN
XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL
89 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 11
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
Project Description
The Project proposes to construct a 4,545 square-foot convenience market with 12 fueling positions and a 1,500 square-foot restaurant on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street in the City of Fowler. Based on data provided to JLB, the proposed Project is consistent with the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan. Figure 3 illustrates the latest Project Site Plan.

Project Access
Based on the latest Project Site Plan, access to and from the Project site will predominantly be from three (3) access points. The Project proposes to have two (2) access points along the west side of Fowler Avenue approximately 140 feet and 340 feet north of Fresno Street. The Project proposes to have one (1) access point along the south side of Fresno Street approximately 65’ feet west of Fowler Avenue. All access points are proposed to have full access.

JLB analyzed the location of the existing and proposed roadways and access points relative to those in the vicinity of the Project site. A review of the existing and proposed roadways and access points indicates that they are located at points that minimize traffic operational impacts to existing and future roadway networks. The Project Site Plan can be found in Figure 3.

Trip Generation
The trip generation rates for the proposed Project were obtained from the 11th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table II presents the trip generation for the proposed Project with trip generation rates for Fast-Food Restaurant without DriveThrough Window (933) and Convenience Store/Gas Station – GFA (4-5.5 k.s.f.) (945). Pass-by Reductions methodologies are consistent with Caltrans’ Guide to Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Absent significant consultation and empirical data which is project specific, Caltrans caps pass-by percentages at 15 percent. Prior to pass-by reductions, the proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 3,762 daily trips, 389 AM peak hour trips and 323 PM peak hour trips. Table III presents the trip generation reductions as a result of pass-by trips. Pass-by reductions are estimated to reduce the trip generation by 563 daily trips, 58 AM peak hour trips and 48 PM peak hour trips. Table IV presents the net new trip generation after the reductions from pass-by trips. The net new trip generation, after pass-by reductions, is estimated to be 3,199 daily trips, 331 AM peak hour trips and 275 PM peak hour trips. 90 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 12
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table II: Project Trip Generation (Before Pass-By)
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Rate Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total
% %
Fast-Food Restaurant without
Drive-Through Window (933) 1.500 k.s.f. 450.49 676 43.18 58 42 38 27 65 33.21 50 50 25 25 50 Convenience Store/Gas Station
– GFA (4-5.5 k.s.f.) (945) 12 f.p. 257.13 3,086 27.04 50 50 162 162 324 22.76 50 50 137 136 273 Total Project Trips 3,762 200 189 389 162 161 323
Notes: k.s.f. = Thousand Square Feet
f.p. = Fueling Positions
Table III: Pass-By Reductions
Land Use (ITE Code)
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
Fast-Food Restaurant without
Drive-Through Window (933) -101 -5 -5 -10 -4 -4 -8
Convenience Store/Gas Station
– GFA (4-5.5 k.s.f.) (945) -462 -24 -24 -48 -20 -20 -40 Pass-By Trips -563 -29 -29 -58 -24 -24 -48
Table IV: Net Project Trip Generation (After Pass-By)
Land Use (ITE Code)
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Project 3,762 200 189 389 162 161 323
Pass-By Reductions -563 -29 -29 -58 -24 -24 -48
Net Project Trips 3,199 171 160 331 138 137 275
Trip Distribution
The trip distribution assumptions were developed based on existing travel patterns, the Fresno COG Project Select Zone, the existing roadway network, engineering judgment, data provided by the developer, knowledge of the study area, existing residential and commercial densities and the City of Fowler 2040 General Plan Circulation Element in the vicinity of the Project site. The Project’s trip generation data was input into the Fresno COG Activity Based Model (ABM) in order to conduct a Project‐specific Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) analysis using the Fresno COG ABM (Cumulative Year 2046). The Fresno COG Project Select Zone results are contained in Appendix C. Figure 4 illustrates the Project Only Trips (Before Pass-By) at the study intersections. Figure 5 illustrates the Pass-By Reductions at the study intersections. Figure 6 illustrates the Project Only Trips (After Pass-By) at the study intersections. 91 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 13
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Bikeways
Currently, Class II bikeways exist in the vicinity of the Project along portions of Sumner Avenue, South Avenue, Sunnyside Avenue and Fowler Avenue. The Fowler Bike, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan recommends that Class I and Class IV bikeways be implemented adjacent to and in the vicinity of the Project Site (City of Fowler, 2023). In the vicinity of the Project Site, Class I bikeways are planned along potions of Golden State Boulevard, Sumner Avenue and Fresno Street. Class II bikeways are planned along portions of Merced Street. Class IV bikeways are planned along portions of Sumner Avenue, South Avenue and Fowler Avenue. Adjacent to the Project Site, a Class IV bikeway is planned along Fowler Avenue and a Class I bikeway along Fresno Street. Therefore, it is recommended that the Project retain the existing Class II bikeway along its frontage to Fowler Avenue.

Walkways
The Fowler Bike, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan classifies pedestrian facilities as either sidewalk or Class I Bike Paths, which allow for exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians. Adjacent to the Project site, sidewalks currently exist along Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street. In the vicinity of the Project site, sidewalks exist along portions of Sumner Avenue, Fresno Street, Fowler Avenue and Merced Street. It is recommended that the Project retain the existing pedestrian sidewalks along its frontages to Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street.

Transit
Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA) is the transit operator in the County of Fresno. At present, there are two (2) Transit Routes that serve the City of Fowler. These include Kingsburg-Reedley Inter-City Transit and Southeast Inter-City Transit. Kingsburg-Reedley Transit runs in the vicinity of the proposed Project via Golden State Boulevard. This route provides a direct connection to the cities of Kingsburg, Fowler, Selma, Parlier and Reedley. The closest stop is located a walking distance of approximately 0.5 miles east of the proposed Project near the Adventist Health Clinic. Southeast Transit runs in the vicinity of the proposed Project via Golden State Boulevard. This Route provides a direct connection to the cities of Kingsburg, Fowler, Selma and Fresno. The closest stop is located a walking distance of approximately 0.5 miles east of the proposed Project near the Adventist Health Clinic.

Kings Area Rural Transit (KART) is the transit operator in the County of Kings. KART Route 17 runs in the vicinity of the proposed Project via Golden State Boulevard. This Route provides a direct connection to the Hanford Transfer Center, Selma Kaiser Hospital, Fowler Children’s Hospital, Fresno Fulton Mall, Fresno Community Center, Fresno Veteran’s Hospital and Selma Kaiser Hospital. The closest stop is located a walking distance of approximately 0.5 miles east of the proposed Project near the Adventist Health Clinic.

Retention of the existing and expansion of future transit routes is dependent on transit ridership demand and available funding.
92 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 14
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Roadway Network
The Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario assumes that the Existing Traffic Conditions roadway geometrics and traffic controls will remain in place with the exception of the Project and its driveways.

Figure 7 illustrates the assumed intersection geometrics and traffic controls for these intersections under this scenario.

Traffic Signal Warrants
Warrant 3 was prepared for the unsignalized intersections under the Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario. These warrants are found in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to satisfy Warrant 3 during both peak periods. Based on the traffic signal warrants, operational analysis and engineering judgement, the signalization or implementation of a roundabout can be considered for the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street. It is understood that Caltrans requires the preparation if Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) before it determines the intersection control strategy. The ISOAP is a more in depth study which needs to initially include a screening and Initial assessment followed by a detailed analysis of the viable strategies. An ISOAP includes the preparation of preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates, and as such, is beyond the scope of work for this TIA. Therefore, this TIA analyzes the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street with improvements as traffic signals and roundabouts without preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates.

Results of Existing plus Project Level of Service Analysis Figure 7 illustrates the Existing plus Project traffic volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls.

LOS worksheets for the Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario are provided in Appendix F. Table V presents a summary of the Existing plus Project peak hour LOS at the study intersections.

Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during one or both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
93 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 15
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix F.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix F.

Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Furthermore, a trap left-turn lane is a lane that appears as a through lane in nature, but forces the driver to make a left-turn at the upstream intersection.

Table V: Existing plus Project Intersection LOS Results ID Intersection Intersection Control
AM (7 - 9)
Peak Hour
PM (4 - 6)
Peak Hour
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
All-Way Stop 90.1 F 22.0 C
Traffic Signal (Improved) 40.3 D 24.6 C
Roundabout (Improved) 9.1 A 7.0 A
2 State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
Two-Way Stop 135.6 F 40.0 E
Traffic Signal (Improved) 16.0 B 16.3 B
Roundabout (Improved) 12.8 B 9.7 A
3 Golden State Boulevard Street / Merced Street Traffic Signal 20.8 C 19.4 B 4 Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue Two-Way Stop 15.5 C 15.1 C 5 Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp Two-Way Stop 10.6 B 10.8 B Note: LOS = Level of Service based on average delay on signalized intersections and All-Way STOP Controls LOS for two-way and one-way STOP controlled intersections are based on the worst approach/movement of the minor street. 94 Section 10, Item D
042-003 - 05.16.2025 - DCC
PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Project Site Plan
Figure 3
12" DISP 2 DISP 4 DISP 1 DISP 3 DISP 5 DISP 6 FRESNO ST FOWLER AVE XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION 60(42) 119(85)
Driveway A Fowler Ave
Driveway A
Fowler Ave & A 89(74) 3(6)
15(12)
38(32) 119(85) 15(12)
Driveway B Fowler Ave
Driveway B
Fowler Ave & B 16(17)
31(25)
7(13)
76(63) 1(6) 28(23)
Fresno St
Driveway C
Driveway C
Fresno St & C
2(4)
9(12)
A
B
C
95 Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Project Only Trips (Before Pass-By)
Figure 4
042-004 - 05/16/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
9(8)
110(71)
7(10)
120(96)
60(48)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
45(46)
75(50)
75(57)
35(14) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
13(11)
15(12)
2(4)
10(19)
46(37) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
32(36)
29(13)
12(23)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
LEGEND
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
24(8)
18(23)
33(16)
33(23)
20(12)
21(20) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
XX
(XX)
= AM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
= PM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
96 Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Pass-By Reductions
Figure 5
042-004 - 04/21/2025 - DC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
-2(-2)
-16(-13) -5(-4)
-6(-5)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
-2(-2)
-3(-2)
-16(-13) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St -5(-4)
-24(-20) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
-18(-15)
-6(-5)
-5(-4)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
LEGEND
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
-1(0)
-1(-1)
-1(-1)
-8(-6)
-4(-2)
-4(-5) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
XX
(XX)
= AM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
= PM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
97 Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Project Only Trips (After Pass-By)
Figure 6
042-004 - 05/19/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
7(6)
94(58)
7(10)
115(92)
54(43)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
43(44)
72(48)
59(44)
35(14) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
13(11)
15(12)
2(4)
5(15)
22(17) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
14(21)
23(8)
7(19)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
LEGEND
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
23(8)
17(22)
32(15)
25(17)
16(10)
17(15) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
XX
(XX)
= AM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
= PM PROJECT ONLY TRIPS
98 Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Existing plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls Figure 7
042-004 - 05/16/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
226(118)
36(47)
310(288)
104(152)
14(29)
448(309)
15(36)149(161)209(163)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
222(187)
639(403)
361(386)
154(217)
58(58)
2(1)
143(90) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
121(57)
25(23)
4(8)
251(202)
47(68)287(388) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
107(160)
196(250)
259(209)
30(21)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
68(32)
342(241)
159(122)
18(23)
313(233)
13(9)
119(110)301(183)
22(25)
87(56)130(292)8(15) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
= STOP SIGN
XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL
99 Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 21
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
Description of Near Term Projects
Near Term Projects are approved and/or known Projects that are either under construction, built but not fully occupied, are not built but have final site development review (SDR) approval or for which the lead agency or responsible agencies have knowledge of. The City of Fowler, County of Fresno and Caltrans staff were consulted during the preparation of this Report regarding approved and/or known projects that could potentially impact the study intersections. Furthermore, JLB staff conducted a reconnaissance of the surrounding area to confirm the Near Term Projects. Therefore, the Near Term Projects listed in Table VI were approved, near approval, or in the pipeline within the proximity of the proposed Project. Projects C and D have not been approved by the City of Fowler at the time of this analysis. However, the projects have been submitted and are under review with City Staff. Both have the potential to have a significant effect on the roadway network and therefore were included in the Near Term analysis.

The trip generation listed in Table VI is that which is anticipated to be added to the roadway network by the Near Term Projects between the time of the preparation of this Report and five years after buildout of the proposed Project. As shown in Table VI, the total trip generation for the Near Term Projects is 3,782 daily trips, 281 AM peak hour trips and 377 PM peak hour trips. Figure 8 illustrates the location of the Near Term Projects and their combined trip assignment to the study intersections under this scenario.

Table VI: Near Term Projects’ Trip Generation
Near Term
Project ID
Near Term
Project Name
Daily
Trips
AM
Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
A Tract 6274 (portion of)¹ 170 13 17
B Tract 6405 (portion of)¹ 321 24 32
C Tract 6501² 971 72 97
D Fowler at South (Phase 1)² 2,320 172 231
Total Near Term Project Trips 3,782 281 377
Note: 1 = Trip Generation prepared by JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. based on readily available information 2 = Trip Generation based on JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Roadway Network
The Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario assumes that the Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions roadway geometrics and traffic controls will remain in place. Figure 9 illustrates the assumed intersection geometrics and traffic controls for these intersections under this scenario.

Traffic Signal Warrants
Warrant 3 was prepared for the unsignalized intersections under the Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario. These warrants are found in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street, Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street and Fowler Avenue at State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp are projected to satisfy Warrant 3 during one or both peak periods. Based on the traffic signal warrants, operational analysis and engineering judgement, the signalization or implementation of a roundabout can 100
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 22
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
be considered for the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street. It is understood that Caltrans requires the preparation if Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) before it determines the intersection control strategy. The ISOAP is a more in depth study which needs to initially include a screening and Initial assessment followed by a detailed analysis of the viable strategies. An ISOAP includes the preparation of preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates, and as such, is beyond the scope of work for this TIA. Therefore, this TIA analyzes the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street with improvements as traffic signals and roundabouts without preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates.

Results of Near Term plus Project Level of Service Analysis Figure 9 illustrates the Near Term plus Project traffic volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls.

LOS worksheets for the Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario are provided in Appendix G.

Table VII presents a summary of the Near Term plus Project intersection LOS.

Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

It should be noted that the traffic signal improvement Synchro Report shows the northbound direction of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street with a left-through-right lane instead of a left-right lane. This is due to a limitation in the Synchro software which does not output a delay for an approach when coded as a left-right lane LOS output for a four-legged signalized intersection.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix G.
101
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 23
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix G.

Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Furthermore, a trap left-turn lane is a lane that appears as a through lane in nature, but forces the driver to make a left-turn at the upstream intersection.

Table VII: Near Term plus Project Intersection LOS Results ID Intersection Intersection Control
AM (7 - 9)
Peak Hour
PM (4 - 6)
Peak Hour
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
All-Way Stop 143.5 F 47.2 E
Traffic Signal (Improved) 37.7 D 28.0 C
Roundabout (Improved) 10.9 B 8.1 A
2 State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
Two-Way Stop 300.6 F 83.8 F
Traffic Signal (Improved) 19.3 B 21.1 C
Roundabout (Improved) 17.2 C 11.2 B
3 Golden State Boulevard Street / Merced Street Traffic Signal 22.3 C 19.6 B 4 Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue Two-Way Stop 18.5 C 18.8 C 5 Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp Two-Way Stop 11.6 B 11.5 B Note: LOS = Level of Service based on average delay on signalized intersections and All-Way STOP Controls LOS for two-way and one-way STOP controlled intersections are based on the worst approach/movement of the minor street. 102
Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commmercial TIA - City of Fowler
Near Term Projects' Trip Assignment
Figure 8
042-004 - 05/16/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
14(6)
3(2)
11(33)
5(14)96(63)
1(4)21(80)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
62(48)
48(21)
15(44)
1(3) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St 96(63)
35(115) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
3(2)
32(113)
96(63)
8(9)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
LEGEND
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
6(6)
34(16)
10(3)
10(25)
4(7)
1(11) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
XX
(XX)
= AM NEAR TERM TRIPS
= PM NEAR TERM TRIPS
A
C
B
D
X = NEAR TERM PROJECT LOCATION
103
Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Near Term plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls Figure 9
042-004 - 05/19/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
240(124)
39(49)
321(321)
109(166)
14(29)
544(372)
16(40)170(241)209(163)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
284(235)
687(424)
376(430)
154(217)
59(61)
2(1)
143(90) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
121(57)
25(23)
4(8)
347(265)
47(68)322(503) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
110(162)
228(363)
355(272)
38(30)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
74(38)
376(257)
169(125)
18(23)
323(258)
13(9)
123(117)301(183)
22(25)
88(67)130(292)8(15) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
= STOP SIGN
XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL
104
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 26
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions
Description of 2046 Cumulative Projects
The trip generation listed in Table VIII is that which is anticipated to be added to the roadway network by the Cumulative Projects between the time of the preparation of this Report and the cumulative year 2046.

As shown in Table VIII, the total trip generation for the 2046 Cumulative Projects is 9,685 daily trips, 719 AM peak hour trips and 966 PM peak hour trips. Figure 10 illustrates the location of the 2046 Near Term Projects and their combined trip assignment to the study intersections under this scenario.

Table VIII: 2046 Cumulative Projects’ Trip Generation
Cumulative
Term
Project ID
Cumulative Term
Project Name
Daily
Trips
AM
Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
A Tract 6274 (portion of)¹ 170 13 17
B Tract 6405 (portion of)¹ 321 24 32
C Tract 6501² 971 72 97
D Fowler at South² 8,223 610 820
Total Near Term Project Trips 9,685 719 966
Note: 1 = Trip Generation prepared by JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. based on readily available information 2 = Trip Generation based on JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Roadway Network
The Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions scenario assumes that the Existing Traffic Conditions roadway geometrics and traffic controls will remain in place. Figure 11 illustrates the assumed intersection geometrics and traffic controls for these intersections under this scenario.

Traffic Signal Warrants
Warrant 3 was prepared for the unsignalized intersections under the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions scenario. These warrants are contained in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street, Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street and Fowler Avenue at State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp are projected to satisfy Warrant 3 during one or both peak periods. Based on the traffic signal warrants, operational analysis and engineering judgement, the signalization or implementation of a roundabout can be considered for the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street. It is understood that Caltrans requires the preparation if Intersection ISOAP before it determines the intersection control strategy. The ISOAP is a more in depth study which needs to initially include a screening and Initial assessment followed by a detailed analysis of the viable strategies. An ISOAP includes the preparation of preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates, and as such, is beyond the scope of work for this TIA. Therefore, this TIA analyzes the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street with improvements as traffic signals and roundabouts without preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates. 105
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 27
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Results of Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Level of Service Analysis Figure 11 illustrates the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project turning movement volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls. LOS worksheets for the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions scenario are provided in Appendix H. Table IX presents a summary of the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project peak hour LOS at the study intersections.

Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

It should be noted that the traffic signal improvement Synchro Report shows the northbound direction of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street with a left-through-right lane instead of a left-right lane. This is due to a limitation in the Synchro software which does not output a delay for an approach when coded as a left-right lane LOS output for a four-legged signalized intersection.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout with two receiving lanes on the east leg. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix H.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a roundabout that has a single-lane approach on the northbound and westbound approaches and a trap left-turn lane and through lane on the eastbound approach.

Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix H. 106
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 28
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Furthermore, a trap left-turn lane is a lane that appears as a through lane in nature, but forces the driver to make a left-turn at the upstream intersection.

Table IX: Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Intersection LOS Results ID Intersection Intersection Control
AM (7 - 9)
Peak Hour
PM (4 - 6)
Peak Hour
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
All-Way Stop 135.6 F 95.6 F
Traffic Signal (Improved) 32.1 C 36.2 D
Roundabout (Improved) 11.2 B 9.9 A
2 State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
Two-Way Stop 145.7 F 87.2 F
Traffic Signal (Improved) 23.8 C 30.6 C
Roundabout (Improved) 8.3 A 9.1 A
3 Golden State Boulevard Street / Merced Street Traffic Signal 48.1 D 27.6 C 4 Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue Two-Way Stop 25.9 D 30.1 D 5 Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp Two-Way Stop 16.1 C 13.9 B Note: LOS = Level of Service based on average delay on signalized intersections and All-Way STOP Controls LOS for two-way and one-way STOP controlled intersections are based on the worst approach/movement of the minor street. 107
Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
2046 Cumulative Projects' Trip Assignment
Figure 10
042-004 - 05/19/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
14(6)
3(2)
27(83)
5(14)296(203)
1(4)73(274)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
202(162)
108(47)
31(94)
1(3) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St 296(203)
103(359) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
3(2)
100(357)
296(203)
14(13)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
LEGEND
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
17(12)
78(32)
11(5)
20(51)
5(19)
5(29) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
XX
(XX)
= AM NEAR TERM TRIPS
= PM NEAR TERM TRIPS
X = NEAR TERM PROJECT LOCATION
A
C
B
D
108
Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
042-004 - 05/19/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
240(124)
32(43)
246(313)
109(166)
7(19)
629(420)
16(40)168(392)209(163)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
381(305)
675(402)
333(436)
154(217)
25(47)
2(1)
187(124) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
108(46)
20(12)
2(4)
542(390)
47(68)368(730) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
133(186)
273(599)
548(393)
44(34)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
69(36)
403(251)
142(118)
20(27)
308(267)
20(16)
111(120)
1412(660)
30(27)
80(75)335(1030)13(22) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
= STOP SIGN
XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Cumulative Year 2046 No Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls Figure 11
109
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 31
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions
Roadway Network
The Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario assumes that the Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions roadway geometrics and traffic controls will remain in place with the exception of the Project and its driveways. Figure 12 illustrates the assumed intersection geometrics and traffic controls for these intersections under this scenario.

Traffic Signal Warrants
Warrant 3 was prepared for the unsignalized intersections under the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario. These warrants are contained in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street, Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street and Fowler Avenue at State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp are projected to satisfy Warrant 3 during both peak periods. Based on the traffic signal warrants, operational analysis and engineering judgement, the signalization or implementation of a roundabout can be considered for the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street. It is understood that Caltrans requires the preparation if Intersection ISOAP before it determines the intersection control strategy. The ISOAP is a more in depth study which needs to initially include a screening and Initial assessment followed by a detailed analysis of the viable strategies. An ISOAP includes the preparation of preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates, and as such, is beyond the scope of work for this TIA. Therefore, this TIA analyzes the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street with improvements as traffic signals and roundabouts without preliminary design plans and construction cost estimates.

Results of Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Level of Service Analysis Figure 12 illustrates the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project turning movement volumes, intersection geometrics and traffic controls. LOS worksheets for the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions scenario are provided in Appendix I. Table X presents a summary of the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project peak hour LOS at the study intersections.

Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street and Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during one or both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

It should be noted that the traffic signal improvement Synchro Report shows the northbound direction of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street with a left-through-right lane instead of a left-right lane. This is due to a limitation in the Synchro software which does not output a delay for an approach when coded as a left-right lane LOS output for a four-legged signalized intersection. 110
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 32
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout with two receiving lanes on the east leg. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix I.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a roundabout that has a single-lane approach on the northbound and westbound approaches and a trap left-turn lane and through lane on the eastbound approach.

Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix I.

4. Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street
o Add an eastbound right-turn lane; and
o Modify the eastbound left-right lane to a trap left-turn lane.

Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Furthermore, a trap left-turn lane is a lane that appears as a through lane in nature, but forces the driver to make a left-turn at the upstream intersection.
111
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 33
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table X: Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Intersection LOS Results ID Intersection Intersection Control
AM (7 - 9)
Peak Hour
PM (4 - 6)
Peak Hour
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
1 State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
All-Way Stop 246.8 F 150.8 F
Traffic Signal (Improved) 47.3 D 49.2 D
Roundabout (Improved) 17.0 C 12.2 B
2 State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
Two-Way Stop 973.4 F 345.6 F
Traffic Signal (Improved) 35.9 D 42.5 D
Roundabout (Improved) 9.7 A 10.7 B
3 Golden State Boulevard Street / Merced Street Traffic Signal 54.6 D 33.9 C 4 Fresno Street / Fowler Avenue
Two-Way Stop 29.9 D 35.5 E
Two-Way Stop (Improved) 26.2 D 30.9 D
5 Fowler Avenue / State Route 99 Southbound On-Ramp Two-Way Stop 16.9 C 14.9 B Note: LOS = Level of Service based on average delay on signalized intersections and All-Way STOP Controls LOS for two-way and one-way STOP controlled intersections are based on the worst approach/movement of the minor street. 112
Section 10, Item D
N
Not To Scale
LEGEND

FRESNO ST

SOUTH AVE FOWLER AVE
99 GOLDEN STATE BLVD UPRR
1 2
3 MERCED ST

SUMNER AVE STANFORD AVE
PROJECT SITE 4
5 PHONE:(559) 570-8991, EMAIL: [email protected], www.JLBtraffic.com 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103, Fresno, CA 93704
042-004 - 05/19/2025 - DCC
1 SR 99 SB Off-Ramp &
Merced Ave
240(124)
39(49)
340(371)
109(166)
14(29)
744(512)
16(40)222(435)209(163)
SR 99 Off-Ramp Fowler Ave
Merced Ave
2 SR 99 NB Ramps &
Merced Ave
424(349)
747(450)
392(480)
154(217)
60(61)
2(1)
187(124) SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced Ave
4 Fowler Ave &
Fresno St
121(57)
35(24)
4(8)
547(405)
47(68)390(747) Fowler Ave
Fresno St
5 Fowler Ave &
SR 99 SB On-Ramp &
147(207)
296(607)
555(412)
44(34)
SR 99 SB On-Ramp Fowler Ave
3 Golden State Blvd &
Merced Ave
92(44)
420(273)
174(133)
20(27)
333(284)
20(16)
127(130)
1412(660)
30(27)
97(90)335(1030)13(22) Golden State Blvd
Merced Ave
LEGEND
# = STUDY INTERSECTION
= STOP SIGN
XX = AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Fowler Commercial TIA - City of Fowler
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project - Traffic Volumes, Geometrics and Controls Figure 12
113
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 35
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Queuing Analysis
Table XI provides a queue length summary for left-turn and right-turn lanes at the study intersections under all study scenarios. The queuing analyses for the study intersections are contained in the LOS worksheets for the respective scenarios. Appendix D contains the methodologies used to evaluate these intersections. Queuing analyses were completed using SimTraffic output information. Synchro provides both 50th and 95th percentile maximum queue lengths (in feet). According to the Synchro manual, “the 50th percentile maximum queue is the maximum back of queue on a typical cycle and the 95th percentile queue is the maximum back of queue with 95th percentile volumes” (Cubic ITS, Inc., 2023). The queues shown on Table XI are the 95th percentile queue lengths for the respective lane movements.

The California Highway Design Manual (CA HDM) provides guidance for determining deceleration lengths for the left-turn and right-turn lanes based on design speeds. According to the CA HDM, tapers for rightturn lanes are “usually unnecessary since main line traffic need not be shifted laterally to provide space for the right-turn lane. If, in some rare instances, a lateral shift were needed, the approach taper would use the same formula as for a left-turn lane” (Caltrans, 2021). Therefore, a bay taper length pursuant to the CA HDM would need to be added, as necessary, to the recommended storage lengths presented in Table XI.

The storage capacity for the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions shall be based on the SimTraffic output files and engineering judgement. The values in bold presented in Table XI are the projected queue lengths that will likely need to be accommodated by the cumulative year 2046. At the remaining approaches of the study intersections, the existing storage capacity will be sufficient to accommodate the maximum queue.
114
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 36
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table XI: Queuing Analysis
ID Intersection Existing Queue Storage Length (ft.) Existing Existing plus Project
Near Term
plus Project
Cumulative
Year 2046
No Project
Cumulative
Year 2046
plus Project

AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM
1 State Route 99
Southbound
Off-Ramp
/
Merced Street
(Traffic Signal)
Southbound Left * * * 207 126 214 136 183 302 223 434
Southbound Left-Through-Right >500 151 148 * * * * * * * * Southbound Through-Right * * * 151 171 185 207 188 470 262 719 Northbound Left-Right >500 258 69 97 96 144 88 126 145 245 208 Northbound Right * * * 131 89 155 87 159 102 209 145
Eastbound Through * * * * * 117 75 95 63 125 87
Eastbound Through-Right >500 171 66 270 144 260 134 137 137 237 115 Westbound Left 100 110 91 283 236 269 249 211 290 306 297 Westbound Through >200 69 63 124 116 96 135 114 143 115 143 1 State Route 99
Southbound
Off-Ramp
/
Merced Street
(Roundabout)
Southbound Through-Right * * * 149 130 131 193 98 439 205 1666 Northbound Left-Right * * * 141 87 357 82 863 80 1063 119 Eastbound Through-Right * * * 86 60 131 70 130 73 201 118 Westbound Left-Through * * * 21 44 43 46 18 64 35 59
2 State Route 99
Northbound Ramps
/
Merced Street
(Signalized)
Northbound Left-Through-Right >500 93 73 161 93 156 118 108 158 213 182 Eastbound Left 100 81 69 182 150 225 184 238 255 292 296 Eastbound Through >200 37 0 205 103 234 112 173 125 217 118 Westbound Through-Right >200 17 15 284 270 319 361 429 715 546 529 2 State Route 99
Northbound Ramps
/
Merced Street
(Roundabout)
Northbound Left-Through-Right * * * 75 61 129 67 57 50 74 64 Eastbound Left * * * * * * * 213 71 169 90
Eastbound Left-Through * * * 15 42 191 25 * * * *
Eastbound Through * * * * * * * 212 63 203 68
Westbound Through-Right * * * 194 167 223 474 168 377 384 492 3 Merced Street
/
Golden State
Boulevard
Southbound Left 140 28 45 23 47 37 49 34 91 42 161
Southbound Through >500 78 100 73 103 72 107 150 311 148 324 Southbound Through >500 50 86 48 98 46 81 145 308 136 326 Southbound Right 60 54 52 55 53 59 52 70 166 69 196
Northbound Left 230 99 116 130 112 146 143 288 146 328 144 Northbound Through >500 105 76 122 89 133 76 455 188 575 230 Northbound Through >500 70 62 83 43 88 63 465 179 551 232 Northbound Right 70 38 28 38 46 43 36 89 47 137 45
Eastbound Left 140 66 82 132 50 161 117 185 115 235 157 Eastbound Through-Right >500 248 183 333 191 345 248 496 249 674 347 Westbound Left 60 62 36 47 60 54 53 82 89 72 88
Westbound Through-Right >500 173 150 173 159 222 167 306 260 316 251 Note: * = Does not exist or is not projected to exist
115
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 37
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table XI: Queuing Analysis (Continued)
ID Intersection Existing Queue Storage Length (ft.) Existing Existing plus Project
Near Term
plus Project
Cumulative
Year 2046
No Project
Cumulative
Year 2046
plus Project

AM PM AM PM AM AM PM AM PM AM
4 Fowler Avenue
/
Fresno Street
Southbound Through-Right >500 0 14 7 19 0 20 0 35 0 8
Northbound Left 75 0 18 10 18 0 18 14 16 0 0
Northbound Through >100 0 10 * * 0 0 0 17 0 21
Eastbound Left-Right >300 86 68 69 73 104 67 104 88 * * Eastbound Left * * * * * * * * * 140 90
Eastbound Right * * * * * * * * * 53 71
5 Fowler Avenue
/
State Route 99
Southbound
On-Ramp
Eastbound Through >100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eastbound Right >100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Northbound Left >500 82 63 73 68 101 71 172 101 205 102 Northbound Right 100 0 0 0 0 47 0 87 0 72 0
Note: * = Does not exist or is not projected to exist
116
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 38
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Project’s Pro-Rata Fair Share of Future Transportation Improvements The Project’s fair share percentage impact to the study intersections for which the Project has no direct impacts, and for which future improvements are not covered by an existing impact fee program, is provided in Table XII. The Project’s fair share percentage impacts were calculated using the Caltrans prorata fair share formula. The Project’s pro-rata fair shares were calculated utilizing the Existing, Project Only Trips and Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project volumes. Figure 2 illustrates the Existing traffic volumes, Figure 6 illustrates the Project Only Trips (After Pass-By) and Figure 12 illustrates the Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project traffic volumes. The critical peak was determined for each intersection independently.

The critical peak period for the study intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street was determined to be during the AM peak period. The critical peak period for the study intersection of Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street was determined to be during the PM peak period. Therefore, the respective critical peak traffic volumes are utilized to determine the Project’s pro-rata fair share for each intersection.

It is recommended that the Project contribute its equitable fair share as listed in Table XII for the improvements necessary to return the intersection to an acceptable LOS. However, fair share contributions should only be made for those facilities or portion thereof not funded by the responsible agencies roadway impact fee program(s) or grant funding, as appropriate. For those improvements not presently covered by local and regional roadway impact fee programs or grant funding, it is recommended that the Project contribute its equitable fair share. Payment of the Project’s equitable fair share in addition to the local and regional impact fee programs would satisfy the Project’s traffic cumulative traffic impacts.

It should be noted that the formula used for fair share impacts places the burden for future roadway improvements solely on future development. As a result, the fair share percentages are often significantly larger than the project’s percentage of traffic to any of the study facilities. In certain cases, the project’s fair share impact in terms of percentage or construction cost will be considerably high while utilizing this fair share formula. As such, it is recommended that the City and Caltrans consider allowing Projects to pay a straight line fair share which is simply the project trips divided by cumulative year trips. Furthermore, the overall construction cost may need to be partially covered by the lead agency or responsible agencies when such improvements are of regional significance.

This study does not provide construction costs for the recommended future year improvement measures; therefore, if the recommended improvement measures are implemented, it is recommended that the Project work with Caltrans, County of Fresno and the City of Fowler to develop the estimated construction cost and subsequently the equitable fair share contribution. 117
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 39
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Table XII: Project’s Fair Share of Future Roadway Improvements ID Intersection Existing Traffic
Volumes
Cumulative Year 2046
plus Project Traffic
Volumes
Project
Only Trips
Project's Fair
Share (%)
1 State Route 99 Southbound
Off-Ramp / Merced Street 1,234 1,933 277 39.63%
2 State Route 99 Northbound
Ramps / Merced Street 1,370 1,966 209 35.07%
4 Fowler Avenue /
Fresno Street 687 1,309 59 9.49%
Note: Project Fair Share = ((Project Only Trips) / (Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Volumes – Existing Traffic Volumes)) x 100 118
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 40
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions and recommendations regarding the proposed Project are presented below.

Existing Traffic Conditions
• At present, all study intersections operate at an acceptable LOS during both peak periods.

Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions
• JLB analyzed the location of the existing and proposed roadways and access points relative to those in the vicinity of the Project site. A review of the existing and proposed roadways and access points indicates that they are located at points that minimize traffic operational impacts to existing and future roadway networks.
• Prior to pass-by reductions, the proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 3,762 daily trips, 389 AM peak hour trips and 323 PM peak hour trips. • Pass-by reductions are estimated to reduce the trip generation by 563 daily trips, 58 AM peak hour trips and 48 PM peak hour trips.
• The net new trip generation, after pass-by reductions, is estimated to be 3,199 daily trips, 331 AM peak hour trips and 275 PM peak hour trips.
• It is recommended that the Project retain the existing Class II bikeway along its frontage to Fowler Avenue.
• It is recommended that the Project retain the existing pedestrian sidewalks along its frontages to Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street.
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during one or both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix F.
119
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 41
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix F.
• Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions
• The total trip generation for the Near Term Projects is 3,782 daily trips, 281 AM peak hour trips and 377 PM peak hour trips.
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix G.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix G.
120
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 42
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
• Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.

Cumulative Year 2046 No Project Traffic Conditions
• The total trip generation for the 2046 Cumulative Projects is 9,685 daily trips, 719 AM peak hour trips and 966 PM peak hour trips.
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout with two receiving lanes on the east leg. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix H.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a roundabout that has a single-lane approach on the northbound and westbound approaches and a trap left-turn lane and through lane on the eastbound approach. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix H. • Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.
121
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 43
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions
• Under this scenario, the intersections of State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp at Merced Street, State Route 99 Northbound Ramps at Merced Street and Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street are projected to exceed their LOS threshold during one or both peak periods. As a result, improvements options are provided for these intersections. It is recommended that the Project should only be responsible for payment of its fair share towards the chosen improvements presented below.

1. State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Add a second eastbound through lane with a receiving lane on the east leg;  Convert the westbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane;  Add a northbound right-tun lane;
 Add a southbound left-turn lane;
 Modify the southbound left-through-right lane to a through-right lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a single-lane roundabout with two receiving lanes on the east leg. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix I.

2. State Route 99 Northbound Ramps / Merced Street
o Traffic Signal Option
 Convert the eastbound left-turn lane to a trap left-turn lane; and  Signalize the intersection with protected left-turn phasing in the east-west direction and split phasing in the north-south direction.
o Roundabout Option
 Construct a roundabout that has a single-lane approach on the northbound and westbound approaches and a trap left-turn lane and through lane on the eastbound approach. Roundabout layouts for this scenario are depicted in Appendix I.

4. Fowler Avenue at Fresno Street
o Add an eastbound right-turn lane; and
o Modify the eastbound left-right lane to a trap left-turn lane. • Constraints for the improvements to study facilities 1 and 2 include the existing structure, existing utilities and planned bikeways. The recommended improvements can fit within existing right-of-way with the aid of design exceptions, specifically along Merced Street. Design exceptions may need to include lane widths, shoulder widths and repositioning of the planned bikeway to take place between the bridge columns and abutment.
122
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 44
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Queuing Analysis
• It is recommended that the City consider left-turn and right-turn lane storage lengths as indicated in the Queuing Analysis.

Project’s Equitable Fair Share
• It is recommended that the Project contribute its equitable Fair Share for those future improvements which are not covered by an existing impact fee program of grant funds. 123
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 45
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
Study Participants
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. Personnel:

Jose Luis Benavides, PE, TE Project Manager
Matthew Arndt, EIT Project Engineer – Traffic Operations Christian Sanchez, EIT Project Engineer – Design
Adrian Benavides Engineer II
Derian Cervantes Engineer I
Diana Cortes Engineering Aide
Arjun Dhillon Engineering Aide
Dennis Wynn Sr. Engineering Technician
Persons Consulted:

Paul Archer Archer Engineering
David Padilla Caltrans, D6
Elizabeth Yelton Caltrans, D6
Hector Luna County of Fresno
Brody Hines County of Fresno
Eric Rocha City of Fowler
Soo Ho Park, PE, TE City of Fowler
Matt Hamilton, PE City of Fowler
Dawn Marple City of Fowler
Mike Aronson Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
124
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 46
(559) 570-8991
Fowler Commercial – City of Fowler
Traffic Impact Analysis Report
July 11, 2025
References
Caltrans. 2019. "Highway Design Manual". Sacramento: State of California.

Caltrans. 2020. “Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide”. Sacramento: State of California.

Caltrans. 2021. "California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Sacramento: State of California.

City of Fowler. 2023. "2040 General Plan". Fowler: City of Fowler.

City of Fowler. 2024. "Bicycle, Pedestrian & Trails Master Plan". Fowler: City of Fowler.

City of Fowler. 2025. "Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines". Fowler: City of Fowler.

County of Fresno. 2000. "Fresno County General Plan". Fresno: Fresno County.

County of Fresno. 2014. "Guidelines for The Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies Within the County of Fresno". Fresno: County of Fresno.

Cubic ITS, Inc. 2019. “Synchro Studio 11 User Guide”. Sugar Land: Trafficware, LLC.

Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2021. "Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition". Washington: Institute of Transportation Engineers.

Transportation Research Board. 2016. "Highway Capacity Manual". Washington: The National Academy of Sciences.
125
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | A
(559) 570-8991
Appendix A: Scope of Work
126
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 1
(559) 570-8991
February 12, 2025
Soo Ho Park
City of Fowler – Department of Public Works
128 S. 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
Via Email Only: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed Scope of Work for the Preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Convenience Market & Gasoline Station at the Northwest Corner of Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street in the City of Fowler (JLB Project 043- 004)
Dear Mr. Park,
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. (JLB) hereby submits this Draft Scope of Work for the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Convenience Market & Gasoline Station (Project) in the City of Fowler. The Project proposes to construct a 4,545 square feet convenience market with 12 fueling positions and a 1,500 square feet restaurant. Based on information provided to JLB, the proposed Project is consistent with the City of Fowler General Plan. An aerial of the Project vicinity and Project Site Plan are shown in Exhibits A and B, respectively.

The purpose of the TIA is to evaluate the potential on-site and off-site traffic impacts, identify shortterm roadway and circulation needs, determine potential mitigation measures and identify any critical traffic issues that should be addressed in the on-going planning process. To evaluate the on-site and offsite traffic impacts of the proposed Project, JLB proposes the following Scope of Work.

Scope of Work
• JLB will obtain recent (less than 12 months) or schedule conduct new traffic counts at the study facility(ies) when schools in the vicinity are in session. These counts will include pedestrians and vehicles.
• JLB will request a Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) traffic forecast model run for the Project (Select Zone Analysis) which will include the Project and the streets to be analyzed. The Fresno COG traffic forecasting model will be used to forecast traffic volumes for the Base Year and Cumulative Year 2046 scenarios.
• JLB will perform a site visit to observe existing traffic conditions, especially during the AM and PM peak hours. Existing roadway conditions including speed limits, lane geometrics, turn prohibitions and traffic controls will be verified.
• JLB will evaluate on-site circulation and provide recommendations as necessary to improve circulation to and within the Project site.
• JLB will qualitatively analyze existing and planned transit routes in the vicinity of the Project. • JLB will qualitatively analyze existing and planned walkways in the vicinity of the Project. • JLB will qualitatively analyze existing and planned bikeways in the vicinity of the Project. 127
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 2
(559) 570-8991
Mr. Soo Ho Park – City of Fowler
Fowler Convenience Market - Draft Scope of Work
February 12, 2025
• JLB will prepare CA MUTCD Warrant 3 “Peak Hour” for unsignalized study intersections under all study scenarios.
• JLB will forecast trip distribution based on turn count information and knowledge of the existing and planned circulation network in the vicinity of the Project. • JLB will evaluate existing and forecasted levels of service (LOS) at the study intersection(s). JLB will use HCM 7th Edition or HCM 2000 methodologies (as appropriate) within Synchro to perform this analysis for the AM and PM peak hours. JLB will identify the causes of poor LOS.

Study Scenarios

1. Existing Traffic Conditions with needed improvements (if any);

2. Existing plus Project Traffic Conditions with proposed improvements (if any);

3. Near Term plus Project Traffic Conditions with proposed improvements (if any); and

4. Cumulative Year 2046 plus Project Traffic Conditions with proposed improvements (if any).

Weekday peak hours to be analyzed (Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday only)

1. 7 - 9 AM peak hour

2. 4 - 6 PM peak hour
Study Intersections

1. Merced Avenue at SR 99 SB off-ramp

2. Merced Avenue at SR 99 NB ramps

3. Fresno Street at Fowler Avenue

4. SR 99 SB On-Ramp at Fowler Avenue
Queuing analysis is included in the proposed Scope of Work for the study intersection(s) listed above under all study scenarios. This analysis will be utilized to recommend minimum storage lengths for leftturn and right-turn lanes at all study intersections.

Study Segments

1. None
Project Only Trip Assignment to State Facilities

1. None
Project Trip Generation
Trip generation rates for the proposed Project land use were obtained from the 11th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table I presents the trip generation, prior to pass-by reductions, for the proposed Project with trip generation rates for a 4,545 square feet convenience market with 12 fueling positions and a 1,500 square feet restaurant. Pass-by Reductions methodologies are consistent with Caltrans’ Guide to Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies.

Absent consultation with Caltrans, Caltrans generally caps pass-by percentages at 15 percent. At buildout, prior to pass-by reductions, the proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 3,762 daily trips, 389 AM peak hour trips and 323 PM peak hour trips. Table II presents the trip generation reductions as a result of pass-by trips. Pass-by reductions are estimated to reduce the trip generation by 563 daily trips, 59 AM peak hour trips and 49 PM peak hour trips. Table III presents the net new trip generation after the reductions from pass-by trips. The net new trip generation, after passby reductions, is estimated to be 3,199 daily trips, 330 AM peak hour trips and 274 PM peak hour trips. 128
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 3
(559) 570-8991
Mr. Soo Ho Park – City of Fowler
Fowler Convenience Market - Draft Scope of Work
February 12, 2025
Table I: Project Trip Generation before Pass-by
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Rate Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total
% %
Fast-Food Restaurant without DriveThrough Window (933) 1.500 k.s.f 450.49 676 43.18 58 42 38 27 65 33.21 50 50 25 25 50 Convenience Store/Gas Station - GFA
(4-5.5K) (945) 12 f.p. 257.13 3,086 27.04 50 50 162 162 324 22.76 50 50 137 136 273 Total Project Trips 3,762 200 189 389 162 161 323
Note: k.s.f. = Thousand Square Feet
f.p. = Fueling Positions
Table II: Pass-By Reductions
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
Fast-Food Restaurant without
Drive-Through Window (933) 1.500 k.s.f. -101 -6 -4 -10 -4 -4 -8 Convenience Store/Gas Station -
GFA (4-5.5K) (945) 12 f.p. -462 -25 -24 -49 -21 -20 -41 Total Trips -563 -31 -28 -59 -25 -24 -49
Note: AM and PM Peak pass-by trips are calculated using ITE Trip Generation Handbook methodologies with 15% cap Land Use 945 uses a cap that is half the pass-by rate listed in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook Table III: Net New Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code)
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Project 3,762 200 189 389 162 161 323
Pass-By Reductions -563 -31 -28 -59 -25 -24 -49
Net New Project Trips 3,199 169 161 330 137 137 274
Access to the Project
Initially, access to and from the Project site is proposed from three (3) access points. Two (2) access points are located along the west side of Fowler Avenue and one access point (1) is located along the north side of Fresno Street. All access points are proposed to allow full access. 129
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 4
(559) 570-8991
Mr. Soo Ho Park – City of Fowler
Fowler Convenience Market - Draft Scope of Work
February 12, 2025
The Scope of Work is based on our understanding of this Project and our experience with similar TIA Reports. We kindly ask that the City of Fowler (lead agency) and all responsible agencies submit any comments by March 5, 2025. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by phone at (559) 317-6245, or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Javier Rios,
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
cc: Jose Luis Benavides, JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Matthew Arndt, JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Eric Rocha, City of Fowler
Hector Luna, County of Fresno
David Padilla, Caltrans
Z:\01 Projects\042 Fowler\042-004 Fowler Fresno TIA\Draft Scope of Work\L20250212 Draft Scope of Work (042-004).docx 130
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 5
(559) 570-8991
Mr. Soo Ho Park – City of Fowler
Fowler Convenience Market - Draft Scope of Work
February 12, 2025
Exhibit A – Project Site Aerial
131
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 P a g e | 6
(559) 570-8991
Mr. Soo Ho Park – City of Fowler
Fowler Convenience Market - Draft Scope of Work
February 12, 2025
Exhibit B – Project Site Plan
132
Section 10, Item D
1 Matt Arndt
From: Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 2:38 PM
To: Matt Arndt
Cc: Paul Archer; [email protected]; Soo Ho Park; Jose Benavides Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work The two comments concerned the inclusion of Merced Street at Golden State Boulevard, and the inclusion of 2046 without Project. No additional comments.

Sincerely,
Matt Hamilton, PE
Senior Engineer

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
400 E Main St, Ste 300, Visalia, CA 93291
Office: (559) 636-1166
Mobile: (559) 679-9258
www.provostandpritchard.com | LinkedIn

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
This communication and any accompanying attachment(s) are privileged and confidential. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity so named. If you are not the intended recipient, then be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this communication and any accompanying attachments (or the information contained in it) is prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and notify the sender at the return e-mail address or by telephone at (559) 449-2700. Thank you.

From: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 2:25 PM
To: Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Archer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>; JOSE BENAVIDES - [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Hello Matt,
Just wanted to follow up on this topic after a phone call with Paul Archer. It is my understanding that with the inclusion of the intersection of Merced Street at Golden States Boulevard in the TIA, the comments on the Draft Scope of Work have been finalized. Is my understanding correct? Please, let me know. Feel free to give me a call if there is any confusion.

Sincerely,
Matthew Arndt
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important 133
Section 10, Item D
2 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Office: (559) 570-8991
Direct: (559) 317-6243
Cell: (559) 360-1886
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 5:21 PM
To: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; Javier Rios <[email protected]>; Paul Archer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; HLuna <[email protected]>; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Jose –
My first comment was not an implication concerning the project’s General Plan consistency. Including Future Year with and without Project is consistent with the City’s TIA guidelines, available online at Resolution-No-2763.pdf.

Given the high volume of traffic generated, we anticipate enough would come to and from the community that the City’s threshold of over 50 peak-hour vehicles would be met. At the very least, the intersection of Merced Street at Golden State Boulevard is one that should be analyzed. My suggestion to provide a trip distribution was intended to allow you to justify the list you provided.

Sincerely,
Matt Hamilton, PE

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
400 East Main Street, Suite 300, Visalia, CA 93291
OƯice: (559) 636-1166 | Cell: (559) 679-9258
Email: [email protected] | Website: provostandpritchard.com From: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:36 PM
To: Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; Javier Rios <[email protected]>; Paul Archer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; HLuna <[email protected]>; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good afternoon Matt,
Yesterday we received comments from the County of Fresno and Caltrans. The County of Fresno has approved the Draft Scope of Work as presented. Caltrans asked that each of the Existing plus Project Scenario be analyzed as the roads and traffic controls exist today and if any improvements are needed that we analyze those separately.

What Caltrans is asking for is the process we follow and as such there is no change to the scope of work either.

Please see their respective comments for your records.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important 134
Section 10, Item D
3 Sincerely,
Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., T.E.

President
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6249
Main: (559) 570-8991
Cell: (559) 694-6000
Fax: (559) 317-6854
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Jose Benavides
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 5:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; Javier Rios <[email protected]>; Paul Archer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; HLuna <[email protected]>; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good afternoon Matt,
Thanks for reviewing the proposed scope of work for the preparation of the TIA.

We had been informed that this project was consistent with the City’s General Plan and that is why we were not proposing to include a Cumulative Year No Project Scenario. Is the City implying that the Project is not consistent with the City’s General Plan? If the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, what would be the purpose of a Cumulative Year No Project scenario specially with LOS is no longer a CEQA threshold? Traffic to and from a Convenience Market and Gasoline Stations is heavily driven bypass by traffic and we do believe that a large percentage of the users of this facility will come through pass-by traffic, from State Route 99, but do understand that some will also come from the community. Based on your response is the City indicating that the list of study intersections will not be finalized until the Project’s select zone from the Fresno COG model is completed?
Sincerely,
Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., T.E.

President
135
Section 10, Item D
4 Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6249
Main: (559) 570-8991
Cell: (559) 694-6000
Fax: (559) 317-6854
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Javier Rios <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 4:41 PM
To: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>; Matt Arndt <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work FYI,
Received this response on the TIA Draft Scope of Work for the Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station this afternoon.

Sincerely,
Javier Rios,
Engineer I/II
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6245
Office: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 4:32 PM
To: Javier Rios <[email protected]>
Cc: Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>; Dawn Marple <[email protected]>; Wyatt Czeshinski 136
Section 10, Item D
5 <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Javier –
The City Engineer has the following comments for your TIA Scope:

Study Scenarios
Near Term shall include Approved Projects
 2046 without Project should be included.

Study Intersections
 Based on the City’s TIA Guidelines, I expect additional intersections would be necessary. This seems to assume all the traffic would travel to and from SR 99. Provide conceptual trip distribution to support this assumption.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Matt Hamilton, PE

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
400 East Main Street, Suite 300, Visalia, CA 93291
OƯice: (559) 636-1166 | Cell: (559) 679-9258
Email: [email protected] | Website: provostandpritchard.com From: Javier Rios <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 5:46 PM
To: Soo Ho Park <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; JOSE BENAVIDES - [email protected] <[email protected]>; Matt Arndt <[email protected]> Subject: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good afternoon,
Attached to this email is the Draft Scope of Work for the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA. This Project is located on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street in the City of Fowler.

We kindly ask that you take a moment to review and comment on the proposed Draft Scope of Work. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by phone at (559)317-6245 or by responding to this email. We appreciate your time and attention to this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important 137
Section 10, Item D
6 Sincerely,
Javier Rios,
Engineer I/II
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6245
Office: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
138
Section 10, Item D
1 Matt Arndt
From: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 3:54 PM
To: Matt Arndt; Yelton, Elizabeth@DOT
Cc: Jose Benavides; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Hi MaƩ,
Yes, perfect. Thank you for the quick response. We have no further concerns.

Thank you,
David Padilla, Branch Chief
Caltrans District 6
Office of MulƟmodal TransportaƟon Planning
Local Development Review Branch
Mobile 559-905-9371
Web www.dot.ca.gov | Email [email protected]
1352 W. Olive Avenue|Fresno, CA 93728
InsƟtute of TransportaƟon Engineers Member
From: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 3:52 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Yelton, Elizabeth@DOT <[email protected]> Cc: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work EXTERNAL EMAIL. Links/attachments may not be safe.

Hello Dave,
A level of service output will be provided for each intersecƟon under the ExisƟng plus Project scenario with and without improvements. Please let me know if this answers your quesƟons.

Sincerely,
Matthew Arndt
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
139
Section 10, Item D
2 Office: (559) 570-8991
Direct: (559) 317-6243
Cell: (559) 360-1886
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 3:45 PM
To: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>; Yelton, Elizabeth@DOT <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Hello MaƩ,
I apologize for the oversight on this review.

In reviewing the Scope of Work (SOW) under the study scenarios, will you be presenƟng the ExisƟng plus Project Traffic condiƟons without improvements to idenƟfy any potenƟal deficiencies? We would like this to be a standalone scenario.

Other than that, we have no further comments.

Elizabeth, please take the lead on this review. I do not believe this is in our database, and at this Ɵme, there is no need to route it.

Thank you,
David Padilla, Branch Chief
Caltrans District 6
Office of MulƟmodal TransportaƟon Planning
Local Development Review Branch
Mobile 559-905-9371
Web www.dot.ca.gov | Email [email protected]
1352 W. Olive Avenue|Fresno, CA 93728
InsƟtute of TransportaƟon Engineers Member
From: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 2:52 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work EXTERNAL EMAIL. Links/attachments may not be safe.

Hello,
Following up to see if you had Ɵme to review this DraŌ Scope of Work. Let me know if you have any quesƟons or comments.

Sincerely,
Matthew Arndt
140
Section 10, Item D
3 Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Office: (559) 570-8991
Direct: (559) 317-6243
Cell: (559) 360-1886
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 4:29 PM
To: [email protected]; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; Javier Rios <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good afternoon all,
We are following up to inquire on the status of your agencies review of the proposed scope of work for the preparation of a TraƯic Impact Analysis for this project in the City of Fowler. Can each one of you provide us with an update on the review progress so that we can have an idea as to when we can expect feedback from each agency?
Thank you for your help on this review.

Sincerely,
Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., T.E.

President
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6249
Main: (559) 570-8991
Cell: (559) 694-6000
Fax: (559) 317-6854
www.JLBtraffic.com
141
Section 10, Item D
4 From: Javier Rios <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 5:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Jose Benavides <[email protected]>; Matt Arndt <[email protected]> Subject: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good aŌernoon,
AƩached to this email is the DraŌ Scope of Work for the preparaƟon of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Convenience Market & Gasoline StaƟon TIA. This Project is located on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street in the City of Fowler.

We kindly ask that you take a moment to review and comment on the proposed DraŌ Scope of Work. If you have any quesƟons or require addiƟonal informaƟon, please contact me by phone at (559)317-6245 or by responding to this email. We appreciate your Ɵme and aƩenƟon to this maƩer and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincerely,
Javier Rios,
Engineer I/II
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6245
Office: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
142
Section 10, Item D
1 Matt Arndt
From: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 4:05 PM
To: Matt Arndt; Padilla, Dave@DOT
Cc: Jose Benavides; Hines, Brody
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work No comment
Regards,
Hector E. Luna| Senior Planner
Department of Public Works and Planning |
Water and Natural Resources Division
2220 Tulare St. 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721
Main OƯice: (559) 600-4292 | Direct: (559) 600-9672
Email: [email protected]
Your input matters! Customer Service Survey
From: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 2:52 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Luna, Hector <[email protected]> Cc: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Hello,
Following up to see if you had Ɵme to review this DraŌ Scope of Work. Let me know if you have any quesƟons or comments.

Sincerely,
Matthew Arndt
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Office: (559) 570-8991
Direct: (559) 317-6243
Cell: (559) 360-1886
www.JLBtraffic.com
143
Section 10, Item D
2 From: Jose Benavides <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 4:29 PM
To: [email protected]; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Matt Arndt <[email protected]>; Javier Rios <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good afternoon all,
We are following up to inquire on the status of your agencies review of the proposed scope of work for the preparation of a TraƯic Impact Analysis for this project in the City of Fowler. Can each one of you provide us with an update on the review progress so that we can have an idea as to when we can expect feedback from each agency?
Thank you for your help on this review.

Sincerely,
Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., T.E.

President
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6249
Main: (559) 570-8991
Cell: (559) 694-6000
Fax: (559) 317-6854
www.JLBtraffic.com
From: Javier Rios <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 5:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Jose Benavides <[email protected]>; Matt Arndt <[email protected]> Subject: Fowler Convenience Market & Gasoline Station TIA Draft Scope of Work Good aŌernoon,
AƩached to this email is the DraŌ Scope of Work for the preparaƟon of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Convenience Market & Gasoline StaƟon TIA. This Project is located on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue and Fresno Street in the City of Fowler.
144
Section 10, Item D
3 We kindly ask that you take a moment to review and comment on the proposed DraŌ Scope of Work. If you have any quesƟons or require addiƟonal informaƟon, please contact me by phone at (559)317-6245 or by responding to this email. We appreciate your Ɵme and aƩenƟon to this maƩer and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincerely,
Javier Rios,
Engineer I/II
Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Parking Solutions Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704
Direct: (559) 317-6245
Office: (559) 570-8991
www.JLBtraffic.com
145
Section 10, Item D
www.JLBtraffic.com
[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 App | B
(559) 570-8991
Appendix B: Traffic Counts
146
Section 10, Item D
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 1 0 49 2 0 39 23 9 3 0 0 28 15 0 0 25 8 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 2 0 62 3 0 38 30 8 6 0 0 33 12 0 0 36 9 0 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 4 0 88 6 0 58 26 7 1 0 0 44 10 4 0 38 18 0 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 0 85 2 0 54 24 1 3 0 0 59 8 3 0 52 15 0 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 1 0 82 0 0 45 17 5 8 0 0 65 3 2 0 56 21 0 2 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 0 78 2 0 52 28 2 8 0 0 58 8 0 0 70 50 0 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 1 0 35 1 0 41 18 5 4 0 0 19 8 1 0 47 33 0 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 0 36 0 0 30 16 5 3 0 0 22 10 1 0 34 10 0 4 TOTAL 0 12 0 515 16 0 357 182 42 36 0 0 328 74 11 0 358 164 0 24 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 6 0 56 3 0 43 24 7 1 0 0 42 2 0 0 67 37 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 7 0 53 2 0 41 39 13 3 0 0 28 9 0 0 51 39 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 4 0 62 2 0 30 23 10 1 0 0 20 17 2 0 59 39 0 4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 2 0 46 0 0 49 32 6 1 0 0 28 13 0 0 53 37 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 2 0 45 1 0 28 22 7 3 0 0 25 10 1 0 66 33 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 53 0 0 53 31 7 3 0 0 31 8 0 0 47 36 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 51 0 0 50 40 11 5 0 0 21 8 2 0 61 32 0 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 1 0 55 1 0 42 29 12 2 0 0 31 6 0 0 47 34 0 2 TOTAL 0 22 0 421 9 0 336 240 73 19 0 0 226 73 5 0 451 287 0 8 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 7 0 333 10 0 209 95 15 20 0 0 226 29 9 0 216 104 0 11 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 19 0 217 7 0 163 118 36 6 0 0 118 41 2 0 230 152 0 4 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.889 4.1% PM 36 118 163 0 0.852
PM 0.963 1.7% AM 15 95 209 0 0.876
PHF 0.903 0.938
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 104 152
118 226 216 230
41 29 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.667 0.918 PHF

0.924 0 7 0 333 AM

0.894 0 19 0 217 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced Avenue
Fresno
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 Clear

36.6263
-119.6848

Merced Avenue
Northbound Westbound
Sumner Avenue
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
Fowler Avenue
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
147
Section 10, Item D
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 9
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0 0 0 1 Peds <>
1 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
1 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp
Sumner Avenue Merced Avenue
Fowler Avenue Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 SB Off-Ramp / Merced Avenue 36.6263
Fresno -119.6848
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 Clear
148
Section 10, Item D
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 3 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 65 0 3 0 0 32 43 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 2 0 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 79 0 7 0 0 41 63 7 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 9 0 35 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 107 0 8 0 0 57 64 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 3 0 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 148 0 6 0 0 66 29 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 4 1 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 166 0 2 0 0 68 12 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 7 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 146 0 5 0 0 111 49 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 2 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 66 0 3 0 0 76 44 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 3 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 57 0 2 0 0 40 24 5 TOTAL 0 33 2 248 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 834 0 36 0 0 491 328 36 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 8 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 92 0 3 0 0 94 68 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 12 0 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 91 0 5 0 0 79 47 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 12 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 72 0 3 0 0 87 51 6 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 12 1 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 100 0 2 0 0 82 51 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 7 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 61 0 3 0 0 95 61 3 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 9 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 102 0 2 0 0 78 28 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 10 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 94 0 5 0 0 84 32 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 10 0 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 101 0 1 0 0 71 33 2 TOTAL 0 80 1 184 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 713 0 24 0 0 670 371 18 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 23 2 143 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 567 0 21 0 0 302 154 17 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 44 1 90 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 355 0 13 0 0 342 217 11 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.908 3.2% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.898 2.4% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.889 0.947
AM PM
0 0 154 217
143 179 302 342
355 567 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.713 0.863 PHF

0.84 0 23 2 143 AM

0.912 0 44 1 90 PM
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced Avenue
Fresno
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 Clear

36.6269
-119.6840

Merced Avenue
Northbound Westbound
Merced Avenue
SR 99 NB On-Ramp
SR 99 NB Off-Ramp
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
149
Section 10, Item D
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 NB On-Ramp
Merced Avenue Merced Avenue
SR 99 NB Off-Ramp Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
SR 99 NB Ramps / Merced Avenue 36.6269
Fresno -119.6840
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 Clear
150
Section 10, Item D
File Name : 01 Merced at GSB
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2025
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 9 24 0 0 33 2 16 3 0 21 2 44 18 0 64 18 25 7 0 50 168 07:15 AM 15 25 0 0 40 2 29 2 1 34 0 68 19 0 87 21 44 10 2 77 238 07:30 AM 13 33 3 0 49 0 41 5 1 47 3 72 35 0 110 20 52 17 0 89 295 07:45 AM 18 31 2 1 52 6 53 4 0 63 11 110 20 0 141 32 82 12 1 127 383 Total 55 113 5 1 174 10 139 14 2 165 16 294 92 0 402 91 203 46 3 343 1084 08:00 AM 17 38 2 0 57 1 97 3 0 101 5 60 27 0 92 32 104 9 1 146 396 08:15 AM 22 28 1 0 51 6 97 6 0 109 3 59 21 0 83 43 87 7 4 141 384 08:30 AM 6 34 5 0 45 1 57 7 3 68 4 43 22 0 69 28 51 8 0 87 269 08:45 AM 11 29 3 0 43 3 36 3 0 42 1 27 18 0 46 26 33 9 0 68 199 Total 56 129 11 0 196 11 287 19 3 320 13 189 88 0 290 129 275 33 5 442 1248 *** BREAK ***
04:00 PM 11 69 4 1 85 1 65 7 1 74 4 47 32 0 83 20 60 11 0 91 333 04:15 PM 15 62 4 0 81 2 60 6 1 69 3 44 26 0 73 22 49 8 1 80 303 04:30 PM 12 77 2 0 91 3 51 4 1 59 4 37 28 0 69 24 43 16 1 84 303 04:45 PM 9 68 3 0 80 1 42 6 1 50 2 50 24 0 76 33 41 11 0 85 291 Total 47 276 13 1 337 7 218 23 4 252 13 178 110 0 301 99 193 46 2 340 1230 05:00 PM 9 77 5 0 91 3 64 5 2 74 3 49 33 0 85 23 52 6 0 81 331 05:15 PM 12 80 5 0 97 0 44 6 0 50 9 39 21 0 69 22 66 2 1 91 307 05:30 PM 11 67 2 0 80 5 66 6 1 78 11 45 22 0 78 29 60 5 2 96 332 05:45 PM 6 37 5 0 48 0 50 8 0 58 1 43 26 0 70 27 47 3 0 77 253 Total 38 261 17 0 316 8 224 25 3 260 24 176 102 0 302 101 225 16 3 345 1223 Grand Total 196 779 46 2 1023 36 868 81 12 997 66 837 392 0 1295 420 896 141 13 1470 4785 Apprch % 19.2 76.1 4.5 0.2 3.6 87.1 8.1 1.2 5.1 64.6 30.3 0 28.6 61 9.6 0.9 Total % 4.1 16.3 1 0 21.4 0.8 18.1 1.7 0.3 20.8 1.4 17.5 8.2 0 27.1 8.8 18.7 2.9 0.3 30.7 JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
151
Section 10, Item D
File Name : 01 Merced at GSB
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2025
Page No : 2

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 13 33 3 0 49 0 41 5 1 47 3 72 35 0 110 20 52 17 0 89 295 07:45 AM 18 31 2 1 52 6 53 4 0 63 11 110 20 0 141 32 82 12 1 127 383 08:00 AM 17 38 2 0 57 1 97 3 0 101 5 60 27 0 92 32 104 9 1 146 396 08:15 AM 22 28 1 0 51 6 97 6 0 109 3 59 21 0 83 43 87 7 4 141 384 Total Volume 70 130 8 1 209 13 288 18 1 320 22 301 103 0 426 127 325 45 6 503 1458 % App. Total 33.5 62.2 3.8 0.5 4.1 90 5.6 0.3 5.2 70.7 24.2 0 25.2 64.6 8.9 1.2 PHF .795 .855 .667 .250 .917 .542 .742 .750 .250 .734 .500 .684 .736 .000 .755 .738 .781 .662 .375 .861 .920

GOLDEN STATE
MERCED
MERCED

GOLDEN STATE
Right
70 Thru
130
Left
8 Peds
1 Out In Total
359 209 568
Right
13 Thru
288
Left
18 Peds
1 Out Total In
355 320 675
Left
103
Thru
301
Right
22 Peds
0 Out In Total
275 426 701
Left
45 Thru
325
Right
127
Peds
6 Total Out In
461 503 964
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
152
Section 10, Item D
File Name : 01 Merced at GSB
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2025
Page No : 3

GOLDEN STATE
From North
MERCED
From East

GOLDEN STATE
From South
MERCED
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 9 68 3 0 80 1 42 6 1 50 2 50 24 0 76 33 41 11 0 85 291 05:00 PM 9 77 5 0 91 3 64 5 2 74 3 49 33 0 85 23 52 6 0 81 331 05:15 PM 12 80 5 0 97 0 44 6 0 50 9 39 21 0 69 22 66 2 1 91 307 05:30 PM 11 67 2 0 80 5 66 6 1 78 11 45 22 0 78 29 60 5 2 96 332 Total Volume 41 292 15 0 348 9 216 23 4 252 25 183 100 0 308 107 219 24 3 353 1261 % App. Total 11.8 83.9 4.3 0 3.6 85.7 9.1 1.6 8.1 59.4 32.5 0 30.3 62 6.8 0.8 PHF .854 .913 .750 .000 .897 .450 .818 .958 .500 .808 .568 .915 .758 .000 .906 .811 .830 .545 .375 .919 .950

GOLDEN STATE
MERCED
MERCED

GOLDEN STATE
Right
41 Thru
292
Left
15 Peds
0 Out In Total
216 348 564
Right
9 Thru
216
Left
23 Peds
4 Out Total In
259 252 511
Left
100
Thru
183
Right
25 Peds
0 Out In Total
422 308 730
Left
24 Thru
219
Right
107
Peds
3 Total Out In
357 353 710
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, CA, 93704
Traffic Engineering, Transportation, & Parking Solutions www.JLBtraffic.com
153
Section 10, Item D
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 3 2 0 0 45 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 17 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 3 4 0 1 52 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 7 4 0 0 65 0 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 32 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 9 4 0 1 67 0 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 12 2 0 1 68 0 2 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 19 3 0 0 46 0 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 5 5 0 0 29 0 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 5 4 0 1 26 0 2 TOTAL 0 147 0 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 510 63 28 0 4 398 0 13 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 19 2 0 1 58 0 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 20 1 0 1 48 0 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 11 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 13 3 0 0 40 0 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 16 2 0 2 41 0 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 17 1 0 3 44 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 7 1 0 0 38 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 21 0 0 0 36 0 4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 16 1 0 1 27 0 1 TOTAL 0 100 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 689 129 11 0 8 332 0 13 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 108 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 47 13 0 2 246 0 10 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 46 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371 68 8 0 4 187 0 7 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.963 3.4% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.918 2.3% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.946 0.772
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 246 187
371 265 2 4
68 47 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.899 0.809 PHF

0.843 0 108 0 10 AM

0.838 0 46 0 11 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound