Fowler City Council
May 5, 2026

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 05, 2026 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625 AGENDA
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance or accommodations to access the City Council Chambers or participate in this meeting, please contact the Clerk at (559) 834-3113 x102. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you may attend in person, you may appear by telephone as described below, or you may submit written comments via email to [email protected]. Please include your name and reference the agenda item you are commenting on, if any. Written comments received that do not specify an agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda. Emails received by 8:00 am on the date of the meeting will be provided to the City Council at the meeting and made part of the record of proceedings but will not be read aloud.

En cumplimiento con la Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades si necesita asistencia o adaptaciones para acceder a las Cámaras del Concejo de la Ciudad o participar en esta reunión, comuníquese con el secretario de la ciudad al (559) 834-3113 x102. También puede ponerse en contacto con el secretario si necesita servicios de traducción. La notificación al menos 48 horas antes de la reunión permitirá a la Ciudad hacer arreglos razonables para garantizar la accesibilidad.
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85185543410?pwd=qnFekvFKM8YN3n62kE2BcEWrGP4k8w.uqolQ WDhnQd0rJA2
Telephone Number: (253) 215-8782
Meeting ID: 851 8554 3410
Passcode: 487705
Persons accessing the meeting will have an opportunity to provide comments at appropriate times during the meeting. To speak during a public comment period, press *9 on your phone to raise your hand or click “raise hand” in the webinar. At the appropriate time, you will be prompted to unmute yourself, and asked to identify yourself when providing public comment.

Any writing or document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the City's website at https://fowlercity.org. 1 Resolutions and Ordinances - With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Councilmember that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, further reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

4. INVOCATION BY PASTOR WALLY ROBERTS OF ROSE OF SHARON CHURCH

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Junior Ambassador of the Year - Harshan Bhandal

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council on any matter not described on this agenda. Presentations are limited to 3 minutes per person and no more than 15 minutes per topic.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and include a recommended action from Staff and shall be acted on by one motion of the Council. If a Councilmember requests additional information or would like to pull an item for discussion, that item shall be pulled from the Consent Calendar and acted upon separately. A Councilmember may register an action on an individual item without pulling the item from the Consent Calendar. A motion to approve the Consent Calendar is deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of ordinances, only those which received a unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present at introduction shall be eligible for placement on the Consent Calendar.
8A RATIFY Pay Warrants for May 5, 2026
8B APPROVE Minutes of the April 21, 2026 City Council Meeting

9. CONTESTED CONSENT CALENDAR
Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be heard individually immediately after action is taken on the Consent Calendar.

10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
City Manager
2 A Discuss and consider options for filling the councilmember vacancy on the City Council for the remainder of the term.

Planning
B Council discussion:
i. RECEIVE a review and update on the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Bill Purewal for the City-owned property on the east corner of 6th and Tuolumne Streets.
ii. PROVIDE DIRECTION to staff on how to proceed with the DDA for the property on 6th and Tuolumne.

C CONSIDER the following:
i. The introduction and waiver of the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-04, prezoning Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 to the R-1-6 zone district, with an R-3 Implementing zone district designation, prezoning the northern half of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the R-1-10 zone district, with an R-1 implementing zone district, and prezoning the southern half of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the R-1-7 zone district, with an R-2 implementing zone district;
ii. Resolution No. 2831, finding that Planning Project No. 25-44 is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025- 45, and Approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537, as conditioned; and
iii. Initiating annexation of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 345-100-05 and 345-100-

04. Public Works
D CONSIDER approving Resolution No. 2832 for project list of SB 1 Local Streets and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds for fiscal year 2026-27. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2832.

11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

12. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

13. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Threat to public facilities; Consultation with Assistant City Manager, Eric Rocha.

14. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION

15. ADJOURN
3 Next Ordinance No. 2026-06
Next Resolution No. 2833
CERTIFICATION: I, Angela Vasquez, City Clerk of the City of Fowler, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review on Thursday, April 30, 2026.

Angela Vasquez, CPMC
City Clerk
4 CHECK NUMBERS CHECK DATES AMOUNT

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
Regular checks 46456 - 46529 April 15 - April 22 $ 156,490.22 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS $ 156,490.22

PAYROLL COSTS
Second April Bi-Weekly Payroll $ 133,482.89
TOTAL PAYROLL COSTS $ 133,482.89

TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS $ 289,973.11
NOTE:

Voided Check 46490

CITY OF FOWLER

WARRANTS LIST
May 5,2026
5 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 04/15/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 16:52:48 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46456 1001 04/15/26 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5110 R HARO NAME PLATE 11.38 46457 1001 04/15/26 12489 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 5200 FLEET PARKS 77.66 46458 1001 04/15/26 10026 BCT CONSULTING 5230 UNIFI NETWORK SWITCH 332.89 46459 1001 04/15/26 13636 BIG TEX 5200 FLEET STREETS 424.99 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 1,810.00 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 206.77 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 94.33 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 38.11 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 291.14 46460 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 38.11 TOTAL CHECK 2,478.46
46461 1001 04/15/26 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNAL 5150 INV 2026-9288 962.00 46461 1001 04/15/26 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNAL 5150 INV 2026-9385 351.50 46461 1001 04/15/26 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNAL 5150 INV 2026-9386 425.50 46461 1001 04/15/26 11291 THE BUSINESS JOURNAL 5150 INV 2026-9432 370.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,109.00
46462 1001 04/15/26 11792 CA BUILDING STANDARDS COM 5272 CA BSASRF JAN26-MAR26 142.20 46463 1001 04/15/26 10506 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATE 5195 ASPHALT STREETS 106.62 46464 1001 04/15/26 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA 5220 STREET SWEEP MAR26 4,500.00 46464 1001 04/15/26 14131 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA 5220 SWEEP WSTE MGMT YRD 1,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 5,500.00
46465 1001 04/15/26 11653 CIVICPLUS LLC 5230 WEBSITE SUBSCRIPTION 5,389.47 46465 1001 04/15/26 11653 CIVICPLUS LLC 5220 MEETING MAN SUB 4,195.24 TOTAL CHECK 9,584.71
46466 1001 04/15/26 12654 COMCAST 5160 INTERNET 743.57
46467 1001 04/15/26 10088 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIO 5220 CASEISMIC JAN26-MAR26 697.03 46468 1001 04/15/26 10108 FIVE CITIES EDA 5110 Q3 JAN-MAR 2026 778.59 46469 1001 04/15/26 10488 FOWLER UNIFIED 5210 FUEL 3,447.60 46470 1001 04/15/26 10104 FPOA 2045 EMP DED 4/10/26 175.00 46471 1001 04/15/26 10122 FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTEC 5715 FULL GRAPHICS 2,026.60 46471 1001 04/15/26 10122 FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTEC 5110 GRAPHICS 2,026.60 46471 1001 04/15/26 10122 FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTEC 5110 GRAPHICS 474.60 TOTAL CHECK 4,527.80
46472 1001 04/15/26 10124 FRESNO SHERIFF BUS OFFICE 5270 PRISONER FEES 1,587.56 46473 1001 04/15/26 10600 FRESNO WIRE ROPE, INC 5200 FLEET STREET 62.60 46474 1001 04/15/26 15506 HIGLEY, MATTEW 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 31.62 46475 1001 04/15/26 10464 IT'S MY PARTY 5110 TABLES AND CHAIRS 246.25 Check 46690 Voided PG 2
6 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 04/15/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 16:52:48 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46476 1001 04/15/26 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 BRAKES/ROTORS 1,000.12 46477 1001 04/15/26 10190 LEXIS NEXIS 5220 ANNUAL RENEWAL 5,657.79 46478 1001 04/15/26 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5220 ANIMAL CONTROL 450.00 46478 1001 04/15/26 10194 LOZANO SMITH 5220 CE ABATEMENT 554.30 TOTAL CHECK 1,004.30
46479 1001 04/15/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 WELL SITE 7 4/5/26 8,174.07 46479 1001 04/15/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 325 S 5TH 4/8/26 169.07 TOTAL CHECK 8,343.14
46480 1001 04/15/26 13095 PBM SUPPLY & MFG 5185 SUPPLIES PARKS 441.67 46480 1001 04/15/26 13095 PBM SUPPLY & MFG 5185 SUPPLIES PARKS 1.69 TOTAL CHECK 443.36
46481 1001 04/15/26 15413 PRINT SHACK 5110 INVOICE #77436 43.34 46482 1001 04/15/26 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CITY OF FOWLER-TCP TR 412.00 46482 1001 04/15/26 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5510 CM & OBSERVATION SERV 11,985.30 46482 1001 04/15/26 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 WATER SUPPLY ASSESS 4,386.20 TOTAL CHECK 16,783.50
46483 1001 04/15/26 14266 RAIGOZA, RAY 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 100.00 46484 1001 04/15/26 15510 RAMIREZ, STEVEN & ALYSSA 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 78.79 46485 1001 04/15/26 15507 ROSA GUZMAN 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 100.00 46486 1001 04/15/26 15509 SINGH DOSANJH , JASKARAN 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 72.33 46487 1001 04/15/26 13355 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 5185 HUNTER SOLENOID 158.43 46488 1001 04/15/26 12791 THE MOWERS EDGE 5200 TRIMMER HEAD REPL 275.82 46488 1001 04/15/26 12791 THE MOWERS EDGE 5200 EXMARK BLADE 225.45 TOTAL CHECK 501.27
46489 1001 04/15/26 15314 UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES CO 5710 DWR ST GRNT WELL 9 28,313.08 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5100 MATS 4/9/26 9.70 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 4/9/26 9.70 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 4/9/26 76.41 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 3/26 103.85 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 3/26 103.85 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 4/9 37.16 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46490 1001 04/15/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 TOTAL CHECK 641.63
46491 1001 04/15/26 15512 VALLEY IRON INC 5200 STREETS FLEET 75.19 46492 1001 04/15/26 15508 VERMEER CA 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 124.54 Voided Check
7 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 04/15/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 16:52:48 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46493 1001 04/15/26 14830 WILLDAN GROUP INC 5225 INSPECTION FEB 2026 1,282.50 TOTAL FUND 97,788.84
8 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 04/15/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 16:52:48 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 201 - DISTRICT SALES TAX

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46494 1001 04/15/26 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5710 ENG PD HQ CONSTRUCTIO 789.60 46494 1001 04/15/26 13655 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 5220 ENG FIRESTATION REMOD 6,191.70 TOTAL CHECK 6,981.30
TOTAL FUND 6,981.30
9 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 04/15/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 16:52:48 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 790 - FIRE STATION PROJECT

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46495 1001 04/15/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5710 FRESNO ST RECON 4,168.25 TOTAL FUND 4,168.25
TOTAL REPORT 108,938.39
10 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 04/16/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 13:24:52 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46496 1001 04/16/26 15514 SUNNYSIDE TROPHY 5110 COUNCIL MEMBER PLAQUE 124.60 TOTAL FUND 124.60
TOTAL REPORT 124.60
11 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 04/22/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 20:09:52 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 45.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 45.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 75.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 75.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 90.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 110.00 46497 1001 04/22/26 13597 ADVENTIST HEALTH 5310 ALCOHOL/DRUG BLOOD 120.00 TOTAL CHECK 560.00
46498 1001 04/22/26 10007 ALERT-O-LITE, INC 5130 PPE-J QUIRING 33.57 46499 1001 04/22/26 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 MARKERS 26.58 46499 1001 04/22/26 14519 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 5100 FOLDER DIVIDERS 10.89 TOTAL CHECK 37.47
46500 1001 04/22/26 12489 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 5205 FLEET WATER 77.65 46501 1001 04/22/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 150.57 46501 1001 04/22/26 10024 BSK ASSOCIATES 5220 WATER TESTING 38.11 TOTAL CHECK 188.68
46502 1001 04/22/26 10506 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATE 5195 ASPHALT STREETS 265.48 46503 1001 04/22/26 14429 CORE & MAIN 5202 STREET MAINT SUPP 301.30 46504 1001 04/22/26 13275 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 5185 MAINT SNR CTR 749.14 46505 1001 04/22/26 10104 FPOA 2045 EMP DED 4/22/26 175.00 46506 1001 04/22/26 10122 FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTEC 5220 GRAPHICS 474.60 46507 1001 04/22/26 10600 FRESNO WIRE ROPE, INC 5120 LIFTING SLING 120.83 46508 1001 04/22/26 14431 GRAYBAR 5715 SCADA 1,611.69
46509 1001 04/22/26 15061 JB ELECTRIC 5710 WELL 6 8,625.00 46510 1001 04/22/26 14575 JPRC PLUMBING INC 5185 TOILET REPAIR 92.50 46510 1001 04/22/26 14575 JPRC PLUMBING INC 5185 TOILET REPAIR 92.50 46510 1001 04/22/26 14575 JPRC PLUMBING INC 5203 DRINK FOUNT REPAIR 220.00 TOTAL CHECK 405.00
46511 1001 04/22/26 10189 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI 5250 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2,500.00 46511 1001 04/22/26 10189 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI 5150 MEMBERSHIP DUES 3,425.00 TOTAL CHECK 5,925.00
46512 1001 04/22/26 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 DIAGNOSTIC - ENGINE 249.97 46512 1001 04/22/26 15215 LEES SERVICE 5205 BATTERY 398.04 TOTAL CHECK 648.01
46513 1001 04/22/26 12717 M&M SCREEN PRINTING 5110 T SHIRT REC COMM 228.86 46514 1001 04/22/26 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 79.15 46514 1001 04/22/26 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5195 SUPPLIES STREETS 23.85 46514 1001 04/22/26 10215 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 5203 SUPPLIES PARKS 170.00 TOTAL CHECK 273.00
12 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 04/22/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 20:09:52 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46515 1001 04/22/26 15023 NICK HARO 5260 FOOD ALLOWANCE 300.00 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS/TEMP 4/15/26 197.69 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 WALTER/FRES 4/15/26 15.08 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 122 S 5TH A 4/1/26 110.89 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 128 S 5TH 4/1/26 23.81 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 128 S 5TH 4/1/26 40.38 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 212 E MERCED 4/1/26 66.53 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 2831 E MANN 4/1/26 88.85 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 4218 GLDNSTAT 4/1/26 70.21 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 500 E MERCED 4/1/26 270.51 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 4/1/26 2.63 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 4/1/26 8.03 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 5TH/FRESNO 4/1/26 542.55 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 95 E ADAMS 4/1/26 2,182.14 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 9TH/MERCED 4/1/26 20.07 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 ADAMS/5TH 4/1/26 488.65 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 GLDNST B 4/1/26 31.25 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 MAIN/5TH 4/1/26 30.39 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 RETRO FIT LOAN APR26 941.28 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 SESWNW231521 4/1/26 4,886.76 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TEMP/OLDN 4/1/26 1,873.92 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 220 E MAIN 4/1/25 10.98 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TRACT 5834 4/15/26 60.10 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 SOUTH & SUNNY 4/15/26 207.09 46516 1001 04/22/26 10237 P G & E - SACRAMENTO 5170 TRACT 5212 4/15/26 126.30 TOTAL CHECK 12,296.09
46517 1001 04/22/26 15180 PEAC SOLUTIONS 5180 COPE LEASE 4/11/26 1,515.43 46518 1001 04/22/26 15517 PORT PROPERTIES 2050 UTILITY BILL REFUND 51.38 46519 1001 04/22/26 14433 PRICE PAIGE & COMPANY CPA 5220 PROFESSIONAL SERV 630.00 46520 1001 04/22/26 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46520 1001 04/22/26 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46520 1001 04/22/26 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 46520 1001 04/22/26 15233 PRIMO BRANDS 5121 WTR SVC 75.24 TOTAL CHECK 300.96
46521 1001 04/22/26 13145 ROSENBALM ROCKERY INC 5202 SUPPLIES STREETS 93.61 46521 1001 04/22/26 13145 ROSENBALM ROCKERY INC 5202 SUPPLIES STREETS 199.86 TOTAL CHECK 293.47
46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH COMM DEV 9.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH PD 270.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH STREETS 18.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH COMM DEV 9.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH PD 270.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH STREETS 18.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH COMM DEV 9.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH PD 585.00 46522 1001 04/22/26 11489 SHOP N GO, INC. 5205 CARWASH STREETS 27.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,215.00
13 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 04/22/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 20:09:52 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 100 - GENERAL FUND

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46523 1001 04/22/26 10518 SIGNMAX! 5195 STREET SIGNS 164.21 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 119.04 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 93.84 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 87.23 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 289.32 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 356.34 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 183.73 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 36.96 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 36.96 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 64.80 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 43.66 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 462.08 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 5084 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 1,011.87 46524 1001 04/22/26 13647 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 2046 DENTAL BENEFIT MAY26 1,333.27 TOTAL CHECK 4,119.10
46525 1001 04/22/26 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 5182 BUSH HOG/CUTTER 2,595.32 46525 1001 04/22/26 10763 SUNBELT RENTALS 5182 SCISSOR LIFT 279.59 TOTAL CHECK 2,874.91
46526 1001 04/22/26 15083 THE CHLORINATOR POOL SERV 5203 FOUNTAIN SVC APR26 250.00 46527 1001 04/22/26 15123 THE SELMA BARN 5200 EQUIP MAINT 711.32 46527 1001 04/22/26 15123 THE SELMA BARN 5200 EQUIP MAINT 44.00 TOTAL CHECK 755.32
46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5100 MATS 4/9/26 9.70 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 4/9/26 76.41 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 MATS/MOPS 4/9/26 9.70 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM STREET 3/26 103.85 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 UNIFORM WATER 3/26 103.85 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 4/9 37.16 46528 1001 04/22/26 13543 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 5185 JANIT SNRCT 4/16 47.91 TOTAL CHECK 388.58
TOTAL FUND 45,854.73
14 Section 8, Item 8A
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 04/22/2026 CITY OF FOWLER VENCHK11
TIME: 20:09:52 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/26
FUND - 201 - DISTRICT SALES TAX

CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED --------------VENDOR-------------- ACCT -------DESCRIPTION------- AMOUNT 46529 1001 04/22/26 14634 DEWBERRY ARCHITECTS INC. 5710 SENIOR CENTER 1,572.50 TOTAL FUND 1,572.50
TOTAL REPORT 47,427.23
15 Section 8, Item 8A

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2026 at 6:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER – 128 SOUTH 5TH STREET, FOWLER, CA 93625

MINUTES

1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Mejia called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.

2. ROLL CALL

PRESENT
Juan Mejia
Amarjeet Gill
Leonard Hammer
Daniel Parra
ABSENT
Karnig Kazarian
City Staff Present: City Manager Reid, City Attorney Santos, Finance Director Banda, Assistant City Planner Czeshinski, Fire Battalion Chief Dominguez, Community & Economic Development Director Flood, Chief Gularte, Fire Unit Chief Hail, City Engineer Park, Assistant City Manager Rocha, City Clerk Vasquez
Councilmember Kazarian arrived at 6:01 P.M.

6. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Swearing in of Police Officer Luis Vasquez

7. PUBLIC COMMENT
Three members of the public spoke.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion made by Parra, Seconded by Gill.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
A. RATIFY Pay Warrants for April 21, 2026
B. APPROVE Minutes of the March 17, 2026 City Council Meeting C. ACCEPT the 2025 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report 16 Section 8, Item 8B

10. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Planning
A. CONSIDER the following:
i. The introduction and waiver of the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-04 by title only, prezoning Assessor's Parcel Number 345-100-05 to the R-1-6 zone district, with an R-3 implementing zone district designation, prezoning the northern half of Assessor's Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the R-1-10 zone district, with an R-1 implementing zone district, and prezoning the southern half of Assessor's Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the R-1-7 zone district, with an R-2 implementing zone district;
ii. Resolution, finding that Planning Project No. 25-44 is consistent with the City's General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45, and Approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537, as conditioned; and iii. Initiating annexation of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 345-100-05 and 345-100-

04. Staff recommends the City Council introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-04, open the public hearing, close the public hearing, approve Ordinance No. 2026-04, adopt the Resolution, and initiate the annexation of APN 345-100-05 and 345-100-04.

Continued to May 5, 2026
Motion made by Gill, Seconded by Mejia.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
B. CONSIDER: Adopting Resolution No. 2828, approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6471 and Direct Staff to File a Certificate of Termination of the Williamson Act Contract Upon Completion of the Annexation Process. Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2828.

A representative of the applicant, Bonique Emerson of Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. stated that she was available for any questions.

Councilmember Parra stated that he may have a conflict of interest due to receiving a campaign contribution in excess of $500 from the President of Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. and recused himself from the matter, left the Council Chambers, and did not participate in the vote on the item.

Mayor Mejia made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2828 as amended to include a 20-foot landscape buffer located at the rear of lots 29 through 38.

Seconded by Gill.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian
17 Section 8, Item 8B
Councilmember Parra rejoined the meeting at 6:55 P.M.

C. CONSIDER: Adopting Ordinance No. 2026-05 Modifying the Regulations related to Tobacco Retailers, Council waive the First Reading of the Ordinance by title only and Conduct a Public Hearing for Ordinance No. 2026-05. Staff Recommends: Council Waive the First Reading of Ordinance No. 2026-05 Repealing and Replacing Chapter 20 of Title 5 relating to the regulation of Tobacco Retailers by title only; Open the Public Hearing; Close the Public Hearing; and Adopt Ordinance No. 2026-05.

The public hearing opened at 6:56 P.M.

Leila Gholamrezaei-Eha, Health Educator with the Fresno County Tobacco Prevention Program spoke.

Council directed staff to revise the Ordinance and bring the item back on May 19, 2026, for the first reading and public hearing.

Motion made by Kazarian, Seconded by Parra.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
Finance
D. RECEIVE AND FILE the Cash and Investment Report for the Third Quarter ending March 31, 2025; Fourth Quarter ending June 30, 2025; First Quarter ending September 30, 2025; Second Quarter ending December 31, 2025; Third Quarter ending March 31, 2026.

E. CONSIDER: Approval of Resolution No. 2829 the submission of a loan application and securing a loan with the Rural Community Assistance Corporation.

Two members of the public spoke.

Motion made by Parra, Seconded by Gill.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
Public Works
F. Actions pertaining to Tract 6405:
i. CONSIDER: Approval of Resolution No. 2830 to accept the public improvements related to Tract 6405 upon receipt of the maintenance bond required by the subdivision agreement.
ii. CONSIDER: Directing the City Engineer to file the notice of completion and release the bonds associated with Tract 6405.

Motion made by Gill, Seconded by Kazarian.

Voting Yea: Mejia, Gill, Hammer, Kazarian, Parra
18 Section 8, Item 8B

11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Updates were given by Assistant City Manager Rocha, Community & Economic Development Director Flood, City Engineer Park, Chief Gularte, and City Manager Reid.

12. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Updates were given by Councilmember Hammer, Mayor Pro Tem Gill, Councilmember Parra, Councilmember Kazarian, and Mayor Mejia.

13. CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Threat to public facilities; Consultation with City Manager and City Attorney.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Exposure to litigation
Number of cases: one
The meeting went into closed session at 8:19 P.M.

14. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ACTION
The meeting reconvened into open session at 9:14 P.M.

There was no reportable action taken on the two items.

15. ADJOURN
Having no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:14 P.M. 19 Section 8, Item 8B

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: May 5, 2026
FROM: MATT FLOOD, Community & Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Council discussion:
i. RECEIVE a review and update on the Disposition and
Development Agreement (DDA) with Bill Purewal for the
City-owned property on the east corner of 6th and
Tuolumne Streets.
ii. PROVIDE DIRECTION to staff on how to proceed with
the DDA for the property on 6th and Tuolumne.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff is seeking direction from Council on how to proceed with the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for the historic Fowler Christian Church located on the east corner of 6th and Tuolumne Streets.

BACKGROUND
In 2023, the City entered into a DDA with Bill Purewal for the conversion of the historic Fowler Christian Church into a mixed-use building. After some due diligence was performed on the part of Mr. Purewal, they requested to have modifications made, and a “revised and restated” DDA was entered into with them in 2024.

In 2025 when I was hired, I met with Mr. Purewal and his staff to obtain information on the status of the project. Mr. Purewal expressed that they felt the original concept was not financially feasible due to the advanced state of dilapidation the building had. They requested consideration of an alternate plan that would involve demolishing the entire structure and building a new one.

In November of 2025 City staff assessed the building and confirmed that the assertion made by Mr. Purewal was most likely founded, with any renovation that would maintain the building intact most likely turning out to be prohibitively expensive.

This recommendation was passed on to the City Manager and he directed staff to work with Mr. Purewal to see what a reworked DDA and plans would look like.

Since that time, staff has had meetings and phone discussions with Mr. Purewal and his staff, working on the details of such an agreement with the City Attorney’s input. 20 Section , Item B
Since so much time has passed and there continues to be a significant amount of interest on the project, staff determined it was best to bring this to Council to receive direction on how to proceed.

If Council wishes to pursue this project, Council can either direct staff to proceed negotiating with Mr. Purewal and bring the reworked DDA to a Council Meeting to be determined, or request that staff explore other options.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from CEQA due to being a simple discussion item in which staff received direction from Council in how to proceed. However, this is part of a larger item that is also exempt pursuant to CCR Section 15312 concerning Surplus Government Property sales in which the property does not hold significant value for environmental habitat, et al.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with assisting the achievement of many goals within the General Plan, including:

General Plan Goal ED-1
Promote economic development through preparation and implementation of an Economic Development Strategy.

General Plan Goal ED-2
Establish a process to work with landowners and business owners to encourage their participation in implementing the City’s economic development goals and policies.

General Plan Goal ED-4
Promote rehabilitation of commercial sites.

General Plan Goal ED-5
Discourage passive land uses, underutilization of land, and vacant structures on available commercial sites.

General Plan Goal ED-6
Encourage activities that attract participants to Fowler and promote economic development.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable, since staff is requesting direction on how to proceed with a future Council item. 21 Section , Item B

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
No procurement is proposed at this time.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
None.
22 Section , Item B

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: May 5, 2026
FROM: WYATT CZESHINSKI, Assistant City Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDER the following:
i. The introduction and waiver of the first reading of
Ordinance No. 2026-04, prezoning Assessor’s Parcel
Number 345-100-05 to the R-1-6 zone district, with
an R-3 Implementing zone district designation,
prezoning the northern half of Assessor’s Parcel
Number 345-100-04 to the R-1-10 zone district, with
an R-1 implementing zone district, and prezoning the
southern half of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-
04 to the R-1-7 zone district, with an R-2
implementing zone district;
ii. Resolution No. 2831, finding that Planning Project
No. 25-44 is consistent with the City’s General Plan
and General Plan Environmental Impact Report
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183,
Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45, and
Approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No.
6537, as conditioned; and
iii. Initiating annexation of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 345-100-05 and 345-100-04.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Project No. 25-44 consists of an application which includes a Tentative Parcel Map (“TPM”), a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (“VTSM”), a request to prezone approximately

76.11 acres of land, and a request to annex the prezoned land to the City of Fowler (“Project”).

VTSM No. 6537 proposes the subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) 345-100-05 (“Project site”), a parcel of approximately 38.35 acres, into 179 single family residential lots, park space, and a storm drainage basin, consistent with the development standards prescribed by the R-3 implementing zone district. Additionally, to create a logical annexation boundary, APN 345-100-04, a parcel of approximately 37.76 acres in size (“Annexation Parcel”), would be prezoned consistent with the City’s General Plan land use for the Annexation Parcel and would be annexed into the City along with the Project site. The Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan. Staff recommend that the City Council introduce 23 Section , Item C
and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-04, adopt Resolution No. 2831, and initiate the annexation of APN 345-100-05 and 345-100-04.

BACKGROUND
Michael Chaney of 1021 Ventures LLC (“Applicant”), has proposed to subdivide an approximately 38.35-acre parcel into a single-family residential subdivision, comprising 179 lots, a 2.41-acre linear park space, and a 2-acre storm drainage basin. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of East Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue (APN 345- 100-05), is designated as Medium Low Density Residential (“MLDR”) by the City’s General Plan, and is zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno. As a part of the Project, the Project site would be annexed to the City of Fowler and prezoned R-1-6, with an implementing zone district of R-3, consistent with the Project site’s MLDR land use designation. The Project site contains an existing single-family residence, with accessory buildings, and has previously been used for agricultural production. Any existing structures would be removed as a part of the Project.

Additionally, as described above, the Project would prezone APN 345-100-04 R-1-10 (northern half) and R-1-7 (southern half), with an implementing zone district of R-1 and R-2, consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (“LDR”) (northern half) and MLDR (southern half), respectively. No development is proposed on this parcel at this time. The parcel has historically been used for agricultural production and currently contains row crops and a rural residential home with accessory structures.

In addition to the VTSM, prezone, and California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) determination actions that the City Council will review, the Project also includes a request for approval of a TPM for the Project site, discussed further below. The designated approval authority for TPM’s is the Planning Commission, however Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section

9.30.080(C) states that “when a proposed project requires more than one (1) permit or approval with more than one (1) approving authority, all applications shall be processed concurrently and action shall be taken by each approving authority, with the option to elevate all discretionary actions to the highest approval authority”. Because the Project includes several proposals that require ultimate approval by the City Council, the Community & Economic Development Director has determined that it would be appropriate for the approval authority to be elevated to the City Council for the TPM as well. As a result, the Planning Commission is serving as a recommending body for each of the proposals of the Project, including the TPM.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Project at it’s March 5, 2026, meeting and voted to recommend that the City Council prezone the Project site and Annexation Parcel as described above, approve a TPM for the Project site, approve a VTSM for the Project site, and initiate annexation of the Project site and Annexation Parcel.

The Project was placed on the April 21, 2026, City Council agenda, but was continued to the May 5, 2026, City Council meeting at the request of the Applicant. 24 Section , Item C

ANALYSIS
General Plan Conformity
As discussed above, the Project site is designated MLDR by the City’s General Plan land use diagram. The Applicant has proposed the annexation of the site to the City of Fowler, requiring that the site be prezoned. The proposed prezoning designation is a mapping designation of R1-6, with an implementing zone district of R-3. According to Table 4-1 of the City of Fowler General Plan, the MLDR land use designation is consistent with the R-1-6 mapping zone district. At 4.67 dwelling units per acre, the proposed Project would also be developed within the density range required by the General Plan.

Public Infrastructure
The Project would have a singular point of access onto West Parlier Avenue, South Fowler Avenue, and the future development to the west of the Project site. Water and sewer infrastructure would be required to be extended along the Project’s South Fowler Avenue and West Parlier Avenue frontages, being reimbursed for any costs in excess of its contribution.

Additionally, approximately 77 feet of sewer main within West South Avenue would be required to be upsized between the manhole at the intersection of West South Avenue and South Fowler Avenue and the South Avenue lift station. This upsizing would be required to be completed by the developer, but would be completely reimbursed by the City using development impact fees that have been previously collected.

While the Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District (SKF) Collection System Master Plan notes that a lift station is planned to serve the Project site, roughly located on its northeastern corner, SKF indicated in a meeting with the City and Applicant on January 30, 2026, that construction of a new lift station would not be required if the Applicant’s engineer demonstrates that the gravity flows from the site were adequate enough to meet SKF’s minimum grade requirements. The proposed sewer main within South Fowler Avenue must also meet the minimum clearance requirements to cross the Consolidated Irrigation District canal that runs west and east through South Fowler Avenue and the Project site without a need for a sewer lift station.

Additionally, the City will be upgrading the South Avenue Lift Station as a CIP project. Should the ultimate buildout of the upgraded lift station not be able to be funded completely by City funds, the remainder of the buildout of the lift station will be funded by developer fair share contributions. If when the Final Map for the Project is approved the upgraded lift station no longer has remaining capacity to serve the Project, then the Applicant shall be responsible for paying the Project’s fair share contribution of the remaining expansion of the lift station to its ultimate buildout.

The interior of the subdivision would provide outlots dedicated for open space and storm drainage purposes. Outlots created and developed for these purposes would be dedicated in fee to the City. Additional outlots are proposed on the exterior of the subdivision for landscaping purposes and would also be dedicated in fee to the City. In addition to constructing interior roads to the City’s current local street standard, the Project would be required to construct it’s West Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue frontages to City standards for a major collector street and major arterial street, respectively.

Traffic Study
25 Section , Item C
The Project was required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (“traffic study”) demonstrating the impact of the proposed development on roadways within the Project site’s vicinity. The traffic study included a recommendation that the Project pay its equitable fair share costs for future impacts to the intersections listed below:
 Merced Street and State Route 99 Northbound Ramps – 10.6%  Merced Street/Sumner Avenue and State Route 99 Southbound Off-Ramp – 15.6%  Fresno Street and Fowler Avenue – 29.1%
 Manning Avenue and State Route 99 Northbound Off-Ramp – 1.4% The City has coordinated with Caltrans on the future mitigation necessary to alleviate impacts to the two Merced Street/State Route 99 intersections listed above and have determined that the appropriate mitigation measure for these two intersections is the construction of a roundabout at both intersections.

Fowler Unified School District (“FUSD”)
Students residing at the Project site would attend Marshall Elementary (K-2), Fremont Elementary (3-5), Sutter Middle School (6-8), and Fowler High School (9-12). The student generation factor within Fowler Unified has ranged between 0.5 and 0.6 students per household, indicating that the proposed Project would generate approximately 89 to 107 students.

In accordance with State law, any new development is subject to school development fees as a condition of building permit issuance to offset potential impacts to schools. The 179 homes proposed throughout the development would be subject to school development fees on a persquare foot (“sqft”) basis. These funds, in combination with bond financing authorized by FUSD voters and State assistance, will provide facilities and reduce overcrowding in the longterm.

Tentative Parcel Map
The Project proposes a TPM that would subdivide the Project site into two resulting parcels of

21.62 (Parcel 1) and 16.73 (Parcel 2) acres, respectively. The parcel map would be required to be recorded subsequent to annexation, but prior to recordation of the Project’s Final Map, assuming the VTSM is approved by the City Council. Processing the TPM concurrently with the VTSM and Final Map, but recording prior to the Final Map, may be beneficial to the Applicant in relation to financing and the phased development of the VTSM.

Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
The proposed VTSM includes 179 single family residential lots, ranging from 4,859 sqft to 10,283 sqft in size. Proposed lots have been reviewed for conformance with the City of Fowler Subdivision Ordinance and the development standards of the R-3 implementing zone district, as outlined in the Fowler Zoning Ordinance. The VTSM would be developed in phases.

Open Space
General Plan Policy OS-3 requires that single-family projects include 5% open space within the boundaries of the Project. Under the current proposal the Applicant would be required to develop approximately 1.92 acres of open space within proposed subdivision. The Project would include approximately 2.41 acres of parkland proposed along the northern and western boundaries of the Project site, meeting the minimum park space requirement. 26 Section , Item C
Fowler Municipal Code Design Standards
The Project is required and will be conditioned to comply with Section 9.120.060 (SingleFamily Residential Subdivision Design Standards) of the Fowler Zoning Ordinance. While the Applicant has not provided elevations for homes that would be constructed as a part of the Project, design would be required to meet City of Fowler’s Single-Family Residential Design Standards.

Kirby Canal
The Project site possesses a Consolidated Irrigation District surface canal that runs through the site in a curvilinear manner. The Project would result in the undergrounding of this existing canal and would relocate the canal to run below the proposed linear park located on the Project site’s northern and western boundary. Relocation of the canal would ensure that no structures are placed above the canal in the future as a result of the proposed VTSM.

Annexation
The Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County (LAFCo) requires that cities within Fresno County be developed with boundaries that occur in a logical manner which prevents the creation of jurisdictional islands. The Project site and Annexation Parcel are currently contiguous to the Fowler city limits to the west of the Project site.

Zoning Code/Map Amendment Findings (Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section 9.110.070) Prior to approving an application for the prezoning of a site, the Approval Authority shall make all of the following findings:

1. The Zoning Code or Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the General Plan.

The Project would result in a residential subdivision developed on a site that meets the density requirements of the MLDR land use designation, for which the site is designated by the City’s General Plan. Prezoning of the site to the R-1-6 mapping zone district/R-3 implementing zone district would be consistent with the site’s MLDR land use designation.

The Project would also result in the prezoning of the Annexation Parcel to the R-1-10 and R-1-7 zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-1 and R-2, respectively, consistent with the Annexation Parcel’s LDR and MLDR land use designation.

As a result, the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and its goals and policies.

2. The Zoning Code or Zoning Map Amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards to ensure compatibility with other established uses.

The Project would result in the development of a single-family residential subdivision on land that is planned for such usage. Prezoning of the Project site and the Annexation Parcel consistent with the underlying land use designation would ensure that 27 Section , Item C
reasonable controls and standards are in place to ensure compatibility with other established uses, as is proposed by the Project.

3. The Zoning Code or Zoning Map Amendment provides reasonable property development rights while protecting environmentally sensitive land uses and species.

As proposed, the Project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report. Prezoning of the Project site and the Annexation Parcel consistent with the underlying General Plan designation, which the Project proposes, would ensure that reasonable property rights are preserved, while environmentally sensitive land uses and species are maintained at the same time. Any mitigations or policies aimed at reducing the impact of the buildout of the City’s General Plan would be applicable to the development of this Project.

4. The Zoning Code or Zoning Map Amendment ensures protection of the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.

The Project proposes to prezone the Project site and the Annexation Parcel consistent with the existing land use designation for the site, as prescribed by the City’s General Plan. Prezoning the site in this manner will ensure that development standards are required consistent with the type of development anticipated for the site. Requiring and enforcing these development standards will ensure protection of the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.

Grounds for Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map
The Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66474) requires cities make the following findings prior to approval of a tentative map:

1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

The proposed TPM would result in the subdivision of the Project site into two resulting parcels that would meet the minimum requirements of the R-3 implementing zone district. The TPM would be consistent with the City’s General Plan and would not conflict with any specific plans.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The proposed TPM is designed in a manner that is consistent with the City’s General Plan, the Fowler Zoning Ordinance, and the Fowler Subdivision Ordinance, and would not conflict with any specific plans.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The TPM would split the Project site in order to aid the phased development of VTSM No. 6537. While no development is directly proposed by the TPM, the Project would 28 Section , Item C
make possible the development of the site into a single-family residential subdivision that is consistent with the site’s General Plan land use designation and the R-3 development standards for which the site would be prezoned as a part of the Project.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The TPM would split the Project site in order to aid the phased development of VTSM No. 6537. While no development is directly proposed by the TPM, the Project would make possible the development of the site into a single-family residential subdivision that is consistent with the site’s General Plan land use designation of MLDR. Meeting the density range prescribed by the General Plan ensures that the Project is developed at a suitable density.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.

The Project is consistent with the previously certified City of Fowler General Plan Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”). The EIR considered impacts to fish and wildlife resources within the City’s Planning Area. Buildout of the land uses analyzed under the General Plan EIR was found to not have a significant environmental effect on biological resources. As such, the proposed Project, which is being developed in accordance with the City’s General Plan, would not result in substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.

6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

There is no evidence in the record that the Project is likely to cause any serious public health problems. The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and would be developed consistent with the City’s development standards, as conditioned.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The TPM would result in the creation of an access and utility easement connecting Parcel 2 to South Fowler Avenue. The TPM would not conflict with any other easement acquired by the public at large.

Grounds for Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map
The Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66474) requires cities make the following findings prior to approval of a tentative map:
29 Section , Item C

1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

As discussed above, the Project site has a MLDR land use designation. According to Table 4-1 of the Fowler General Plan, the MLDR land use designation is consistent with the R-1-6 mapping zone district, which the Applicant has applied for the prezoning of the property as, subsequent to annexation by the City. This prezoning would make the site’s General Plan and zoning designation consistent with one another. As proposed, the VTSM meets the density requirements of the MLDR land use designation and conforms with the R3 implementing zone district standards, making the Project consistent with both the applicable General Plan and zoning requirements.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The proposed VTSM has been reviewed for compliance with the City’s General Plan, the Fowler Subdivision Ordinance, and the Fowler Zoning Ordinance. As conditioned, the Project meets all applicable design and improvement requirements.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The Project site is designated as MLDR by the City’s General Plan and is thus anticipated for single-family residential development. After reviewing the VTSM, it has been determined that the Project site is suitable for the type of development being proposed.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Project site is designated as MLDR by the City’s General Plan and is thus anticipated for single-family residential development. The proposed VTSM would result in a dwelling unit per acre ratio of 4.67, which is within the density range prescribed by the General Plan for the MLDR land use designation. The Project site has been determined to be adequate for the type of density proposed within the development.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.

The Project is consistent with the previously certified City of Fowler General Plan EIR.

The EIR considered impacts to fish and wildlife resources within the City’s Planning Area. Buildout of the land uses analyzed under the General Plan EIR was found to not have a significant environmental effect on biological resources. As such, the proposed Project, which is being developed in accordance with the City’s General Plan, would not result in substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.
30 Section , Item C

6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

There is no evidence in the record that the Project is likely to cause any serious public health problems. The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and would be developed consistent with the City’s development standards, as conditioned.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The Project would not conflict with any existing easements acquired by the public at large. An easement would be created by the Project’s TPM for Parcel 2 to have access and utility connection to South Fowler Avenue. Additionally, the Kirby Canal would be relocated along the Project site’s northern and western boundary. A new easement of 30 feet in width would be dedicated to Consolidated Irrigation District as a result of the relocation. The existing canal easement would be abandoned.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Business Journal on April 10, 2026, which is at least twenty (10) days prior to the public hearing. It was also sent via US Mail to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed Project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The first step in complying with CEQA is to determine whether the activity in question constitutes a “project” as defined by CEQA (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.; Cal. Code Regs.

Tit. 14, § 15000, et seq. [“CEQA Guidelines”].) The second step is to determine whether the project is subject to or exempt from CEQA. This Project qualifies as a project under CEQA because it involves the issuance of a “lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use” as described in CEQA Guidelines section 15378, subdivision (a)(3). Development of the Project site into a residential subdivision qualifies as a “project” under CEQA.

The Project would result in the construction of a new residential subdivision on land that is planned for such usage. The Project aligns with the site’s MLDR General Plan land use designation, will prezone the Project site and the Annexation Parcel consistent with the General Plan land use designations for each, and would qualify to be found consistent with the City’s General Plan EIR under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

Accordingly, staff recommend that the City Council find that the Project is absolved from further environmental analysis, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. If the Project is approved, a Notice of Exemption for the Project will be filed with the County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:

General Plan Goal LU-1
31 Section , Item C
Growth occurs logically and efficiently.

General Plan Goal LU-2
A wide range of housing types are available to accommodate all housing needs in the community.

General Plan Policy LU-1
Development shall occur in accordance with the planned land uses as shown on Figure 4-1:

Land Use Diagram.

General Plan Policy LU-4
The overall maximum density of the land use designation shall not be exceeded, except when a project is eligible for increased density as part of a Planned Unit Development or under the State Density Bonus Law.

General Plan Policy LU-8
Annex land into the City in accordance with adopted growth management thresholds and reject proposals for annexation that do not comply with requirements of General Plan policies relating to orderly and contiguous development and provision of public services and facilities.

General Plan Policy CDES-26
Single family residential projects shall be designed in a way such that they enhance Fowler’s character.

General Plan Policy CDES-27
Discourage direct access to collector streets from single-family residential properties except where physical circumstances do not allow other design solutions.

General Plan Policy OS-3
Within single family residential projects, whether attached or detached, a minimum of 5% of the project site, not inclusive of existing or future major road rights-of-way, shall be developed with usable open space. Such open space shall be maintained by an assessment district, landscape/lighting district, homeowners' association, or other appropriate maintenance entity.

General Plan Policy OS-4
Usable open space areas, as required in Policy OS-3, may fulfill the requirements for parkland dedication, per the City’s Quimby Ordinance. To qualify, such land shall be dedicated to the City and meet the minimum established requirements for usable open space.

General Plan Policy OS-20
Require the planting of shade trees with substantial canopies within private development.

General Plan Goal MOB-1
Fowler’s streets are a safe and enjoyable environment for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and people of all ages and abilities.

General Plan Policy ED-5
Discourage passive land uses, underutilization of land, and vacant structures on available commercial sites.
32 Section , Item C

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project would result in the collection of development impact fees for single-family residential projects in accordance with the most current development impact fee schedule at the time that the Project application was received by the City. Development of the site would also increase the assessed value of the property and therefore generate additional ongoing property tax revenue to the City. Development impact fees would also be expended to reimburse the Applicant for the construction of sewer infrastructure improvements within West South Avenue.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflicts of interest are known to exist.

Attachments
- Attachment 1: Regional Vicinity Map
- Attachment 2: Aerial Map
- Attachment 3: General Plan Land Use Map
- Attachment 4: Zoning Map
- Attachment 5: Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45
- Attachment 6: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 - Attachment 7: Traffic Study and Amendment Letter
- Attachment 8: Ordinance No. 2026-04
- Attachment 9: Resolution No. 2831
33 Section , Item C
Attachment 1: Regional Vicinity Map
34 Section , Item C
Attachment 2: Aerial Map
35 Section , Item C
Attachment 3: General Plan Lan Use Map
36 Section , Item C
Attachment 4: Zoning Map
37 Section , Item C
Attachment 5: Tentative Parcel Map No. 2024-25
38 Section , Item C
Attachment 6: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 39 Section , Item C
Attachment 7: Traffic Study and Amendment Letter
40 Section , Item C
TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
February 24, 2026
Prepared by:

VRPA Technologies, Inc.
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93722
Attachment 7: Traffic Study and Amendment Letter
41 Section , Item C
TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
Study Team
 Georgiena Vivian, President, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (559) 259-9257
 Erik Ruehr, Director of Traffic Engineering, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (858) 566-1766
 Jeff Stine, Senior Transportation Planner, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (858) 566-1766
 Jason Vivian, Director of Civil Engineering, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (559) 577-6974
 Ryan Vivian, Transportation Planning Technician, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (559) 259-6261
 Michiel Gallanosa, Engineering Intern, VRPA Technologies, Inc., [email protected], Ph: (559) 271-1200
42 Section , Item C
Table of Contents
Section Description Page

1.0 Introduction 1

1.1 Description of the Region/Project 1

1.1.1 Project Access 1

1.1.2 Study Area 1

1.1.3 Study Scenarios 2

1.2 Methodology 2

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis 2

1.3 Policies to Maintain level of Service 3

1.4 VMT Analysis 3

1.5 Traffic Safety Analysis 3

2.0 Project Traffic 9

2.1 Trip Generation 9

2.2 Trip Distribution 9

2.3 Project Traffic 9

3.0 Traffic Impacts 13

3.1 Existing Traffic and Level of Service (LOS) 13

3.2 Opening Year Traffic Conditions 14

3.3 Future Year Traffic Conditions 15

3.4 Queuing Analysis 32

4.0 Mitigation 34

4.1 Roadway Improvements 34

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility 35
Appendices
Appendix A – Traffic Count Data Worksheets
Appendix B – Synchro Worksheets
Appendix C – Signal Warrant Worksheets
Appendix D – Tract 6501 Trip Generation Figures
Appendix E – Mitigation Scenario Synchro Output Files
Appendix F – Traffic Safety Analysis

43 Section , Item C
List of Tables
1-1 Signalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions 7 1-2 Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions 8 2-1 Project Trip Generation 9
3-1 Intersection LOS – Existing & Opening Year 19
3-2 Intersection LOS – Horizon Year 31
3-3 Queuing Operations – All Scenarios 33
4-1 Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements 37 4-2 Left Turn and Right Turn Storage Requirements 37
4-3 Project Fair Share Cost for Intersection Improvements 38 List of Figures
1-1 Regional Location 4
1-2 Project Location 5
1-3 Site Plan 6
2-1 Project Trip Distribution 10
2-2 Project Peak Hour Trips AM 11
2-3 Project Peak Hour Trips PM 12
3-1 Existing (2025) Lane Geometry 16
3-2 Existing (2025) Peak Hour Traffic AM 17
3-3 Existing (2025) Peak Hour Traffic PM 18
3-4 Existing (2025) With Project AM 20
3-5 Existing (2025) With Project PM 21
3-6 Existing (2025) With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects AM 22 3-7 Existing (2025) With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects PM 23 3-8 Opening Year With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects AM 24 3-9 Opening Year With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects PM 25 3-10 Horizon (Future) Year Lane Geometry 26
3-11 Horizon (Future) Year 2046 Without Project AM 27
3-12 Horizon (Future) Year 2046 Without Project PM 28
3-13 Horizon (Future) Year 2046 With Project AM 29
3-14 Horizon (Future) Year 2046 With Project PM 30
4-1 Horizon Year Recommended Improvements 36

44 Section , Item C
1 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Description of the Region/Project
This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) has been prepared for the purpose of analyzing traffic conditions related to the proposed TTM 6537 Residential Development project (the Project) located within greater Fresno County and the City of Fowler’s Sphere of Influence. The TIS is intended to identify the extent to which the Project would affect traffic operations that may indicate a need for improvements within the study area and/or other measures to address traffic operations.

The project calls for the development of 199 single-family residential units, and the proposed subdivision will be located on the northwest corner of Fowler Avenue and Parlier Avenue approximately 0.8 miles south of the State Route (SR) 99 and Merced Street interchange within the City of Fowler. Figure 1-1 shows the regional context of the Project site while Figure 1-2 shows the Project location. Figure 1-3 shows the site plan of the proposed Project.

1.1.1 Project Access
The Project has two primary access points, one located along the west side of Fowler Avenue and the other located along the north side of Parlier Avenue.

1.1.2 Study Area
The study intersections included in this TIS are listed below and shown in Figure 1-2. The study intersections were developed in consultation with the City of Fowler, Fresno County, and Caltrans staff.

Intersections
 1 - W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramps
 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave  3 - Fowler Ave/W. Fresno St
 4 - Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB On-Ramp
 5 - Fowler Ave/South Ave
 6 - Fowler Avenue/Parlier Avenue
 7 - Fowler Avenue/Manning Avenue
 8 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 SB Ramps
 9 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 NB On-Ramp (Left from EB Manning to NB On-Ramp)  10 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 NB Off-Ramp
45 Section , Item C
2 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

1.1.3 Study Scenarios
This TIS includes level of service (LOS) analysis for the following traffic scenarios (Study Scenarios):
 Existing (2025) Conditions
 Existing (2025) Conditions With Project
 Existing (2025) Conditions With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects  Opening Year 2026 With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects  Horizon (Future) Year 2046 Without Project
 Horizon (Future) Year 2046 With Project

1.2 Methodology
This TIS was prepared using general principles outlined in the City of Fowler’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (dated January 2025) modified as described in the Traffic Impact Study Scoping Document to be consistent with current conditions. In analyzing street and intersection capacities, the Level of Service (LOS) methodologies are applied. LOS standards are applied by transportation agencies to quantitatively assess a street and highway system’s performance. In addition, safety concerns are analyzed to determine the need for appropriate mitigation resulting from increased traffic near sensitive uses and other evaluations such as the need for signalized intersections or other improvements. Guidelines incorporated in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition, were also used in the development of this TIS.

1.2.1 Intersection Analysis
Intersection LOS analysis was conducted using the Synchro software program. Synchro supports HCM methodologies and is deemed an acceptable program by City of Fowler, County of Fresno, and Caltrans staff for assessment of traffic impacts. LOS can be determined for both signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Tables 1-1 and 1-2 define LOS “A” to “F” by indicating the ranges in the amounts of average delay for a vehicle at signalized and unsignalized intersections for each level of service ranging from LOS “A” to “F”.

When an intersection does not meet target LOS standards (LOS A, B, C, or D), analysis is conducted to determine whether improvements are needed.

In addition, for unsignalized intersections that do not meet acceptable LOS standards, an evaluation would be conducted to determine whether signal warrants would indicate the need for a traffic signal. Signal warrants are numerical thresholds used by traffic engineers to determine whether a traffic signal is needed. If signal warrants are not met, the typical conclusion 46 Section , Item C
3 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
is that the intersection is operating at an acceptable LOS. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) introduces standards for determining the need for traffic signals. The California MUTCD indicates that the satisfaction of one or more traffic signal warrants does not in itself require the installation of a traffic signal. In addition to the warrant analysis, an engineering study of the current or expected traffic conditions should be conducted to determine whether the installation of a traffic signal is justified.

1.3 Policies to Maintain Level of Service
In accordance with standard TIS practice, the goal of the project is to achieve a target LOS D or better for street segments and intersections.

1.4 VMT Analysis
A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis will not be needed since the project is consistent with the City of Fowler’s General Plan.

1.5 Traffic Safety Analysis
A traffic safety analysis was conducted to determine whether there are any safety concerns on the State highway system that would be increased by the addition of project traffic. The analysis is included in Appendix F.
47 Section , Item C
4 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

48 Section , Item C
5 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

49 Section , Item C
6 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
50 Section , Item C
7 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
Table 1-1
Signalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions
(Highway Capacity Manual)
51 Section , Item C
8 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
Table 1-2
Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Definitions (Highway Capacity Manual)

52 Section , Item C
9 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

2.0 Project Traffic

2.1 Trip Generation
To assess the impact that the Project may have on the surrounding roadway network, the first step is to determine Project trip generation. Project trip generation was determined using trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). The considerations described above led to the recommended trip generation for weekday AM (7:00-9:00am) and PM (4:00-6:00pm) peak hours shown in Table 2-1.

2.2 Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution percentages are shown in Figure 2-1. These percentages are based upon knowledge of the study area, engineering judgement, prevailing traffic patterns in the study area, major routes, population centers, and other existing development.

2.3 Project Traffic
Project traffic as shown in Table 2-1 was distributed to the roadway system using the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 2-1. A graphical representation of the resulting AM and PM peak hour Project trips is shown in Figures 2-2, and 2-3.

IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Single Family Residential (210) 199 Units 9.09 1,871 0.70 25:75 38 101 139 0.93 63:37 112 69 181 1,871 38 101 139 112 69 181 DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT)
Table 2-1

LAND USE/

ITE LAND USE CODE QUANTITY WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME RATE IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME RATE Project Trip Generation - Total Vehicles IN:OUT SPLIT VOLUME TOTAL EXTERNAL TRIP GENERATION
53 Section , Item C
10 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

54 Section , Item C
11 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

55 Section , Item C
12 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

56 Section , Item C
13 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

3.0 Traffic Impacts

3.1 Existing Traffic and Level of Service (LOS)
Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements were collected by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) on Wednesday September 10, 2025, at the following project study intersections:
 1 - W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramps
 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave  3 - Fowler Ave/W. Fresno St
 4 - Fowler Ave/SR 99 SB On-Ramp
 5 - Fowler Ave/South Ave
 6 - Fowler Avenue/Parlier Avenue
 7 - Fowler Avenue/Manning Avenue
 8 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 SB Ramps
 9 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 NB On-Ramp (Left from EB Manning to NB On-Ramp)  10 - Manning Avenue/SR 99 NB Off-Ramp
Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements were collected by VRPA at the intersection of E. Parlier Avenue and S. Clovis Avenue on Thursday, October 2, 2025. Existing traffic at this intersection was collected by VRPA at the request of the County of Fresno following their review of the scoping document.

All intersection turning movement counts were conducted for the peak hour periods of 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM. Existing roadway lane geometry is shown in Figure 3-1. Existing traffic is shown in Figures 3-2 and 3-3. Traffic count data worksheets are provided in Appendix B.

Project traffic, as calculated in Chapter 2, was added to Existing traffic to determine Existing (2025) With Project traffic as shown in Figures 3-4, and 3-5. Note that the intersection of E. Parlier Avenue and Clovis Avenue was not studied as part of this TIS however per the County of Fresno’s request, VRPA performed a count of this intersection and when comparing the total intersection traffic for Existing Vs. Existing With Project Traffic, there is a difference of 5 trips (171 total trips for Existing AM Without Project Traffic and 176 total trips for Existing AM With Project Traffic) which is the equivalent of a 2.92% increase in traffic at this intersection as a result of the Project.

Project traffic, as calculated in Chapter 2, was added to Existing traffic plus Approved/Pending Projects to determine Existing (2025) With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects traffic as shown in Figures 3-6, and 3-7. Note that VRPA met with City staff to discuss all applicable Approved/Pending projects which included the following:
 Clayton and Golden State Blvd. Property Prezone:
57 Section , Item C
14 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
o Located at the southeast corner of Clayton Avenue and Golden State Blvd. and consisting of a proposed 44-lot industrial subdivision – project traffic prepared by VRPA as part of a previous TIS project.
 City of Fowler - Blossom Pointe Apartments:
o Located at the northeast quadrant of the Mariposa Street and 10th Street intersection and consisting of a 116 multi-family dwelling unit development – project traffic prepared by VRPA as part of a previous TIS project.  City of Fowler Buford Oil Company Travel Center:
o Located at the northeast corner of Manning Avenue and SR 99 and consisting of a proposed Travel Stop including tire shop, restaurant(s), and hotel – project traffic prepared by Peters Engineering Group as part of a previous TIS project.  City of Fowler – Tract 6501:
o Located at the northwest corner of the intersection of E. South Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue and consisting of a proposed 103 lot subdivision – see Appendix D for AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Generation.

Intersection operations for all Existing Traffic conditions (Existing, Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Project with Cumulative Developments), are shown in Table 3-1.

Except for the intersections at 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave, and 10 - Manning Avenue/SR99 NB Off-Ramp, all study area intersections for all Existing Traffic conditions (Existing, Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Project with Cumulative Developments) operate at level of service D or better. At the intersection of 2 - Sumner Ave/W.

Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave, and 10 - Manning Avenue/SR99 NB Off-Ramp, although the Existing Plus Project with Cumulative Developments traffic exceeds LOS D, these intersections do not meet peak hour signal warrants (California MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant – Warrant 3) because the minor approaches do not carry enough traffic to justify signalization (see Appendix D for Signal Warrant Worksheet).

3.2 Opening Year Traffic Conditions

Traffic conditions with the Project for the assumed opening year of 2026 were estimated by applying a growth rate of 2% per year to the existing traffic volumes. Project traffic, as calculated in Chapter 2, was added to Opening Year (2026) traffic plus Approved/Pending Projects to determine Opening Year (2026) With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects traffic as shown in Figures 3-8, and 3-9.

Intersection operations for Opening Year conditions With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects are shown in Table 3-1. Except for the intersections at 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave, and 10 - Manning Avenue/SR99 NB Off-Ramp, all study area 58 Section , Item C
15 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
intersections for these conditions operate at level of service D or better. At the intersection of 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave, and 10 - Manning Avenue/SR99 NB Off-Ramp, although the Opening Year conditions With Project Plus Approved/Pending Projects traffic exceeds LOS D, these intersections do not meet peak hour signal warrants (California MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant – Warrant 3) because the minor approaches do not carry enough traffic to justify signalization (see Appendix D for Signal Warrant Worksheet).

3.3 Horizon (Future) Year Traffic Conditions

Horizon Year traffic conditions with and without the Project in the Year 2046 (20 years from Opening Year conditions) were estimated by taking the larger of the traffic volumes from the following conditions:
 Applying a growth rate of 2% per year to the existing traffic volumes  2046 Fresno COG Regional Model with segment growth factors (taken by comparing the regional model future daily traffic to the existing average daily traffic) When comparing the traffic generated from these varying conditions, it was determined that traffic generated from applying a 2% growth rate per year to existing traffic volumes controlled.

The Horizon Year Lane Geometry is shown in Figure 3-10. The resulting traffic for the Horizon Year Without Project scenario is shown in Figures 3-11 and 3-12.

Project traffic, as calculated in Chapter 2, was added to Horizon Year traffic to determine Horizon Year With Project traffic as shown in Figures 3-13 and 3-14.

Intersection operations for Horizon Year conditions With and Without Project traffic are shown in Table 3-2.

For Horizon Year conditions, the intersections at 1 – Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramp, 2 - Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave, and 9 - Manning Avenue/SR99 NB Off-Ramp, all study area intersections for all Existing Traffic conditions (Existing, Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Project with Cumulative Developments) operate at level of service D or better. At the intersection of 3 – Fowler Ave/W. Fresno St, although traffic exceeds LOS D, these intersections do not meet peak hour signal warrants (California MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant – Warrant 3) because the minor approaches do not carry enough traffic to justify signalization (see Appendix D for Signal Warrant Worksheet).

59 Section , Item C
16 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

60 Section , Item C
17 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

61 Section , Item C
18 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

62 Section , Item C

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 22.8 C 28.5 D 40.2 E
+ 45.0 E+
PM 23.5 C 29.7 D 39.4 E
+ 44.0 E+
AM 19.3 C 30.5 D 47.1 E
+ 51.4 F+
PM 19.7 C 30.6 D 54.9 F
+ 61.3 F+
AM 14.9 B 17.4 C 19.2 C 19.8 C
PM 14.4 B 17.3 C 19.4 C 20.0 C
AM 11.0 B 12.1 B 12.8 B 13.0 B
PM 10.8 B 11.5 B 11.9 B 12.0 B
AM 12.3 B 14.1 B 16.5 C 16.9 C
PM 12.4 B 14.5 B 17.4 C 17.8 B
AM 10.8 B 11.0 B 11.1 B 11.3 B
PM 9.6 A 9.7 A 9.7 A 10.0 A
AM 9.6 A 9.7 A 9.8 A 10.0 A
PM 9.7 A 9.9 A 10.0 A 10.2 B
AM 13.2 B 13.4 B 16.0 C 16.3 C
PM 12.9 B 13.2 B 16.2 C 16.4 C
AM 8.1 A 8.1 A 8.3 A 8.3 A
PM 7.8 A 7.8 A 8.0 A 8.0 A
AM 19.5 C 21.2 C 32.4 D 35.3 E
+
PM 23.2 C 23.2 C 45.4 E
+ 50.8 F+
- DELAY is measured in seconds
- LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded + Does not meet peak hour signal warrant.

7. Fowler Ave and Manning Ave Four-Way
Stop
D

8. Manning Ave and SR 99 SB Ramps Two-Way
Stop
D

9. Manning Ave and SR 99 NB OnRamp
Two-Way
Stop
D

10. Manning Ave and SR 99 NB OffRamp
Two-Way
Stop
D
Two-Way
Stop
D
Two-Way
Stop

4. Fowler Ave and SR 99 SB On-Ramp Two-Way
Stop
D

5. Fowler Ave and South Ave Two-Way
Stop
D

6. Fowler Ave and Parlier Ave
Four-Way
Stop
D

1. W. Merced St. and SR 99 NB
Ramps
Table 3-1
Intersection LOS - Existing & Opening Year
EXISTING + PROJECT +

APPROVED/PENDING

PROJECTS
OPENING YEAR +
PROJECT +

APPROVED/PENDING

PROJECTS
- For signalized intersections, delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For one-way stop controlled intersections, delay results show the delay for the worst movement.

D
EXISTING EXISTING + PROJECT

3. Fowler Ave and W. Fresno St. Two-Way
Stop
D

INTERSECTION CONTROL
TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR

2. Sumner Ave/W. Merced St. and
SR99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave
63 Section , Item C
20 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

71 15
0 6
0270
0 6
086
64 Section , Item C
21 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

65 Section , Item C
22 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

66 Section , Item C
23 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

67 Section , Item C
24 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

68 Section , Item C
25 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
69 Section , Item C
26 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
70 Section , Item C
27 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
71 Section , Item C
28 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

72 Section , Item C
29 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

73 Section , Item C
30 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
74 Section , Item C

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 278.9 F 494.1 F
PM 226.2 F 400.0 F
AM 137.0 F 187.1 F
PM 133.1 F 175.6 F
AM 29.2 D 41.9 E
+
PM 24.2 C 33.9 D
AM 13.9 B 16.4 C
PM 13.3 B 14.7 B
AM 17.6 C 22.1 C
PM 17.7 C 22.9 C
AM 12.5 B 12.9 B
PM 10.2 B 10.7 B
AM 13.4 B 13.8 B
PM 13.6 B 14.5 B
AM 17.5 C 17.9 C
PM 17.3 C 17.9 C
AM 8.5 A 8.5 A
PM 8.1 A 8.1 A
AM 148.8 F 181.1 F
PM 208.0 F 216.0 F
- DELAY is measured in seconds
- LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded + Does not meet peak hour signal warrant.

10. Manning Ave. and SR 99 NB OffRamp Two-Way Stop D

9. Manning Ave. and SR 99 NB OnRamp Two-Way Stop D
- For signalized intersections, delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For one-way stop controlled intersections, delay results show the delay for the worst movement.

5. Fowler Ave. and South Ave. Two-Way Stop D

6. Fowler Ave. and Parlier Ave. Two-Way Stop D

7. Fowler Ave. and Manning Ave. Four-Way Stop D

8. Manning Ave. and SR 99 SB Ramps Two-Way Stop D
Four-Way Stop D

3. Fowler Ave. and W. Fresno St. Two-Way Stop D

4. Fowler Ave. and SR 99 SB On-Ramp Two-Way Stop D

2. Sumner Ave / W. Merced St. and SR
99 SB Off-Ramp / Fowler Ave

1. W. Merced St. and SR 99 NB Ramps Two-Way Stop D
Table 3-2
Intersection LOS - Horizon Year

INTERSECTION CONTROL TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR
HORIZON YEAR 2046
HORIZON YEAR 2046 +

PROJECT
75 Section , Item C
33 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

3.4 Queuing Analysis
Table 3-3 provides a queue length summary for left and right turn lanes at the study intersections for all scenarios. Queuing analysis was performed at study intersections utilizing the Synchro software program. Synchro provides the 95th percentile queue for signalized intersections and shows the length of the queue in feet. Queue length for stop-controlled intersections was calculated by multiplying the Synchro output vehicle for each intersection leg by 25-feet to determine the total queue length.

Queueing is noted as a concern at the Merced Street/Fowler Avenue/Sumner Avenue/SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp intersection as queue for the left turn from westbound Merced Street to southbound Fowler Avenue is expected to exceed the available storage length for the following scenarios:
 Existing Plus Approved Projects Plus Project (PM peak hour only)  Opening Year Plus Project (PM peak hour only)
 Horizon Year (2046) Without Project (AM and PM peak hours)  Horizon Year (2046) Plus Project (AM and PM peak hours) 76 Section , Item C
33 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

77 Section , Item C
35 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

4.0 Mitigation

4.1 Roadway Improvements
As discussed in Section 3.0 (Traffic Impacts), roadway improvements may be desirable to support the development of the Project, as well as to accommodate traffic increases related to overall growth in the study area. The Project site, currently outside of the City of Fowler limits but within the City of Fowler’s sphere of influence, proposes the development of 199 single-family residential units.

Considering the criteria provided in Section 1.3 (Policies To Maintain Level of Service) and the results presented in Section 3.0, the following improvements may be implemented to alleviate roadway deficiencies identified in this Transportation Impact Study.

INTERSECTIONS
 1 – W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramps
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Existing Plus Approved Projects Plus Project, Opening Year Plus Project, Horizon Year Without Project, and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions Alternative 1
o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the westbound approach to the intersection to include a through lane and a right turn lane (adding one right turn lane)
Alternative 2
o Install a roundabout
 2 – Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Existing Plus Approved Projects Plus Project, Opening Year Plus Project, Horizon Year Without Project, and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions Alternative 1
o Install a traffic signal when warranted
o Widen the northbound approach to the intersection to include a left turn lane and a right turn lane with right-turn overlap phasing (adding one right turn lane with rightturn overlap phasing) 78 Section , Item C
36 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
Alternative 2
o Install a roundabout
 3 – Fowler Avenue and W. Fresno Street
Install a traffic signal when warranted.

The intersection is forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels of service under the Horizon Year scenarios. However, this intersection does not meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant because the minor approach does not carry enough traffic to justify signalization. It should be noted that installation of a traffic signal would alleviate level of service deficiencies at the intersection.
 10 – Manning Avenue and SR99 NB Off-Ramp
Recommended improvements to achieve acceptable levels of service:
 Existing Plus Approved Projects Plus Project, Opening Year Plus Project, Horizon Year Without Project, and Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions o Install a traffic signal when warranted
The level of service resulting from the potential improvements identified above is shown in Table 4-1 with queuing analysis presented in Table 4-2. Figure 4-1 shows the recommended improvements at the respective intersections considering the Horizon Year Plus Project scenario.

In the case of the W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramps and Sumner Ave/W. Merced St/SR 99 SB OffRamp/Fowler Ave intersections, only the traffic signal alternatives identified above have been analyzed. The City of Fowler and Caltrans have conducted separate analyses and are actively pursuing the installation of roundabouts at these intersections.

In addition to the information provided above, it is noted that Table 4-2 indicates that queuing concerns would be expected at the W. Merced St/SR 99 NB Ramps and the Sumner Ave/W.

Merced St/SR 99 SB Off-Ramp/Fowler Ave two study area intersections with the recommended improvements. Queuing exceeding the expected storage lengths would be expected in various scenarios for the Merced Street/SR 99 interchange area for the following movements:
 Eastbound Merced Street to Northbound SR 99
 Westbound Merced Street to Northbound SR 99
 Westbound Merced Street to Southbound Fowler Avenue
79 Section , Item C
37 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
The queuing concerns identified above support the decision of the City and Caltrans to pursue the installation of roundabouts at the SR 99/Merced Street interchange area. Although Caltrans and the City have conceptually proposed roundabouts at the interchange of SR 99 and Merced Street, this study does not assume their implementation in the 2046 horizon year due to pending development approvals.

4.2 Equitable Share Responsibility
It is expected that the Project will contribute to the City of Fowler’s traffic impact fee program to provide for its share of the improvements described above. For informational purposes, this section shows the Project’s equitable share responsibility for the improvements described above.

The formula used to calculate the equitable share responsibility to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities is as follows:

Equitable Share = (Project Trips)/(Horizon Year Plus Project Traffic – Existing Traffic) Table 4-3 shows the Project’s equitable fair share responsibility on a percentage basis for improvements to City of Fowler/Caltrans facilities as described above. The equitable fair share responsibility shown in Table 4-3 is the result of LOS enhancements related to capacity.

80 Section , Item C
36 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study

81 Section , Item C

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
AM 14.1 B 14.3 B 16.9 B 20.3 C
PM 10.8 B 11.0 B 12.2 B 13.4 B
AM 17.1 B 17.4 B 20.4 C 21.6 C
PM 20.6 C 21.0 C 23.0 C 30.6 C
AM N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.7 A 6.8 A
PM N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.0 A 7.1 A
AM 12.9 B 12.9 B 13.5 B 13.5 B
PM 13.4 B 13.4 B 14.6 B 14.6 B
- DELAY is measured in seconds
- LOS = Level of Service / BOLD denotes LOS standard has been exceeded - For signalized intersections, delay results show the average for the entire intersection. For one-way stop controlled intersections, delay results show the delay for the worst movement.

10. Manning Ave. and SR 99 NB OffRamp
D

1. W. Merced St. and SR 99 NB Ramps D

2. Sumner Ave / W. Merced St. and SR
99 SB Off-Ramp / Fowler Ave D

3. Fresno St and Fowler Ave D
Table 4-1
Intersection Operations with Roadway Improvements

INTERSECTION TARGET
LOS
PEAK
HOUR
HORIZON YEAR 2046 HORIZON YEAR 2046 +

PROJECT
EXISTING + PROJECT +

APPROVED/PENDING

PROJECTS
OPENING YEAR +
PROJECT +

APPROVED/PENDING

PROJECTS
82 Section , Item C
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
AM
Queue
PM
Queue
NW R/L 1200 73 70 76 72 114 105 120 109
NEL 90 229 175 234 182 273 195 385 259
SWR 100 51 56 54 59 113 135 116 138
SE R/L 1500 161 251 166 212 239 306 239 356
NER 600 202 192 208 197 358 323 359 342
NW R/L 1000 183 28 209 32 384 139 536 99
SWL 120 203 302 207 313 304 336 313 395
NEL 200 N/A N/A N/A N/A 89 84 89 84
NWL 75 N/A N/A N/A N/A 25* 25* 25* 25*
N L/R 1100 68 65 70 69 107 126 122 128
- Queue is measured in feet / BOLD denotes exceedance
- * Denotes minimum value queue length based on factor of 25 ft per vehicle FUTURE YEAR 2046
PLUS PROJECT FUTURE YEAR 2046

OPENING YEAR

PLUS PROJECT

EXISTING PLUS

EXISTING QUEUE PROJECT PLUS AP
STORAGE LENGTH (ft) INTERSECTION

3. Fowler Ave and Fresno St

10. Manning Ave and SR 99 NB Off-Ramp

2. Sumner Ave/W. Merced St. and SR99 SB OffRamp/Fowler Ave Table 4-2
Queuing Operations - Mitigated Scenarios

1. W. Merced St. and SR 99 NB Ramps
83 Section , Item C
38 TTM 6537 Residential Development
Transportation Impact Study
84 Section , Item C
85 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-001 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 15 87 171 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 40 130 188 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 136 0 109
0 0 0 0 0 216 0 206
0 0 0 0 TEV 1171 0 1202 0 0 0 0
209 0 161 2 PHF 0.90 0.95
25 0 43 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 7 0 281 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 6 0 343 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 318

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave/SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
630 0 723
Cars (AM) 389 HT (AM)
130 0 183

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0
S Fowler Ave/SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Off Ramp & N Summer Ave/W Merced St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave/SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Off Ramp Wednesday SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 4
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
4 7
6 0
0 134
43 212
160
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 103
21 199
203
0 86
Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-002 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 41 259 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 70 321 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
109 0 71 0 TEV 680 0 685 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 PHF 0.91 0.94
18 0 12 0
0 1 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 1 210 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 253 0 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 281
S Fowler Ave & W Fresno St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 362 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
0 0 0
Cars (AM) 333 HT (AM)
41 0 71

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(EB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 277

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
12 0
0 71
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
18 0
0 108
87 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-003 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 166 110 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 196 134 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 558 0 555 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 PHF 0.96 0.93
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 209 16 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 252 30 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 209
S Fowler Ave & SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB On Ramp
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 252 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
150 0 140
Cars (AM) 196 HT (AM)
0 0 0

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 166

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
88 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-004 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 189 0 224
1 316 0 296
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
186 0 146 1 TEV 1415 0 1245 0 0 0 0
536 0 484 1 PHF 0.86 0.95
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 39 1 70 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 19 6 148 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 336
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Ramps & W Merced St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Ramps Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 416 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
554 0 684
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
315 0 355

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 5
0 0
4 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 12
0 0
19 8
183
311
0 0
480
143
0 0
0 0
0 0
215
284
0 0
517
178
89 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-005 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 130 0 127
0 0 0 0 0 98 0 92
0 0 0 0 TEV 828 0 1100 0 0 0 0
128 0 154 1 PHF 0.82 0.97
22 0 25 0
0 0 1 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 5 0 688 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 6 0 453 AM
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 0
SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Ramps & Manning Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Ramps Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
842 0 581
Cars (AM) 123 HT (AM)
133 0 135

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 114

NORTHBOUND
SR 99/Golden State Hwy SB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 13
0 22
9 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 17
6 28
18 0
0 117
25 76
145
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 110
16 64
110
0 90
Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-006 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 1 517 0 733
1 228 0 220
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0 12 0 TEV 1531 0 1589 0 0 0 0
567 0 832 2 PHF 0.77 0.98
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB On Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
832 0 567
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
220 0 228

CONTROL
No Control
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 529
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB On Ramp & Manning Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB On Ramp Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 744 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
35 35
0 0
42 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
57 45
0 0
74 3
482
193
0 0
790
12 0
0 0 0
0 0
676
175
0 0
493
8 91
Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-007 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 720 0 955
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 TEV 1641 0 1648 0 0 0 0
516 0 795 2 PHF 0.79 0.98
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 27 0 106 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 36 0 134 AM
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Off Ramp Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
901 0 650
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
991 0 747

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0

NORTHBOUND
SR 99/Golden State Hwy NB Off Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 66
0 0
51 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 104
0 0
60 0
0 654
0 0
744
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 851
0 0
456
0 92
Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-008 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 5 146 31 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 6 149 33 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 28 0 14
1 72 0 78
0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29
4 0 4 0 TEV 608 0 645 0 0 0 0
57 0 103 1 PHF 0.91 0.95
7 0 16 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 18 157 30 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 14 183 40 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 189
S Fowler Ave & Manning Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 201 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
166 0 128
Cars (AM) 194 HT (AM)
97 0 96

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 182

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 1
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 13
0 6
15 0
28 62
16 28
95 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
14 65
7 23
42 4
93 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-009 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 1 166 2 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 1 174 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 1 0 TEV 388 0 388 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 PHF 0.89 0.93
7 0 7 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 6 194 2 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 2 204 1 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 173

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
2 0 4
Cars (AM) 183 HT (AM)
3 0 8

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 195
S Fowler Ave & E Parlier Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 208 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
7 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
6 0
1 1
94 Section , Item C
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 25-090097-010 Day:

City: Fowler Date:

AM 26 137 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 50 142 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
78 0 63 0 TEV 484 0 485 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1 PHF 0.97 0.88
31 0 31 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 38 159 0 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 16 194 0 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 222
S Fowler Ave & E South Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
S Fowler Ave Wednesday
SOUTHBOUND 9/10/2025
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 274 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
NONE
1 0 0
Cars (AM) 174 HT (AM)
42 0 88

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 168

NORTHBOUND
S Fowler Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 0
31 1
1 60
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
29 0
0 77
95 Section , Item C
96 Section , Item C
97 Section , Item C
98 Section , Item C
99 Section , Item C
100
Section , Item C
101
Section , Item C
102
Section , Item C
103
Section , Item C
104
Section , Item C
105
Section , Item C
106
Section , Item C
107
Section , Item C
108
Section , Item C
109
Section , Item C
110
Section , Item C
111
Section , Item C
112
Section , Item C
113
Section , Item C
114
Section , Item C
115
Section , Item C
116
Section , Item C
117
Section , Item C
118
Section , Item C
119
Section , Item C
120
Section , Item C
121
Section , Item C
122
Section , Item C
123
Section , Item C
124
Section , Item C
125
Section , Item C
126
Section , Item C
127
Section , Item C
128
Section , Item C
129
Section , Item C
130
Section , Item C
131
Section , Item C
132
Section , Item C
133
Section , Item C
134
Section , Item C
135
Section , Item C
136
Section , Item C
137
Section , Item C
138
Section , Item C
139
Section , Item C
140
Section , Item C
141
Section , Item C
142
Section , Item C
143
Section , Item C
144
Section , Item C
145
Section , Item C
146
Section , Item C
147
Section , Item C
148
Section , Item C
149
Section , Item C
150
Section , Item C
151
Section , Item C
152
Section , Item C
153
Section , Item C
154
Section , Item C
155
Section , Item C
156
Section , Item C
157
Section , Item C
158
Section , Item C
159
Section , Item C
160
Section , Item C
161
Section , Item C
162
Section , Item C
163
Section , Item C
164
Section , Item C
165
Section , Item C
166
Section , Item C
167
Section , Item C
168
Section , Item C
169
Section , Item C
170
Section , Item C
171
Section , Item C
172
Section , Item C
173
Section , Item C
174
Section , Item C
175
Section , Item C
176
Section , Item C
177
Section , Item C
178
Section , Item C
179
Section , Item C
180
Section , Item C
181
Section , Item C
182
Section , Item C
183
Section , Item C
184
Section , Item C
185
Section , Item C
186
Section , Item C
187
Section , Item C
188
Section , Item C
189
Section , Item C
190
Section , Item C
191
Section , Item C
192
Section , Item C
193
Section , Item C
194
Section , Item C
195
Section , Item C
196
Section , Item C
197
Section , Item C
198
Section , Item C
199
Section , Item C
200
Section , Item C
201
Section , Item C
202
Section , Item C
203
Section , Item C
204
Section , Item C
205
Section , Item C
206
Section , Item C
207
Section , Item C
208
Section , Item C
209
Section , Item C
210
Section , Item C
211
Section , Item C
212
Section , Item C
213
Section , Item C
214
Section , Item C
215
Section , Item C
216
Section , Item C
217
Section , Item C
218
Section , Item C
219
Section , Item C
220
Section , Item C
221
Section , Item C
222
Section , Item C
223
Section , Item C
224
Section , Item C
225
Section , Item C
226
Section , Item C
227
Section , Item C
228
Section , Item C
229
Section , Item C
230
Section , Item C
231
Section , Item C
232
Section , Item C
233
Section , Item C
234
Section , Item C
235
Section , Item C
236
Section , Item C
237
Section , Item C
238
Section , Item C
239
Section , Item C
240
Section , Item C
241
Section , Item C
242
Section , Item C
243
Section , Item C
244
Section , Item C
245
Section , Item C
246
Section , Item C
247
Section , Item C
248
Section , Item C
249
Section , Item C
250
Section , Item C
251
Section , Item C
252
Section , Item C
253
Section , Item C
254
Section , Item C
255
Section , Item C
256
Section , Item C
257
Section , Item C
258
Section , Item C
259
Section , Item C
260
Section , Item C
261
Section , Item C
262
Section , Item C
263
Section , Item C
264
Section , Item C
265
Section , Item C
266
Section , Item C
267
Section , Item C
268
Section , Item C
269
Section , Item C
270
Section , Item C
271
Section , Item C
272
Section , Item C
273
Section , Item C
274
Section , Item C
275
Section , Item C
276
Section , Item C
277
Section , Item C
278
Section , Item C
279
Section , Item C
280
Section , Item C
281
Section , Item C
282
Section , Item C
283
Section , Item C
284
Section , Item C
285
Section , Item C
286
Section , Item C
287
Section , Item C
288
Section , Item C
289
Section , Item C
290
Section , Item C
291
Section , Item C
292
Section , Item C
293
Section , Item C
294
Section , Item C
295
Section , Item C
296
Section , Item C
297
Section , Item C
298
Section , Item C
299
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 479 105 1 313 106 18
Future Volume (veh/h) 479 105 1 313 106 18
Number 6 16 5 2 7 14
Initial Q, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj (A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Lanes Open During Work Zone
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 521 114 1 340 115 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Opposing Right Turn Influence Yes Yes
Cap, veh/h 1073 235 589 1350 154 27
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Prop Arrive On Green 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.10 0.10
Unsig. Movement Delay
Ln Grp Delay, s/veh 0.0 4.4 4.8 2.9 29.4 0.0
Ln Grp LOS A A A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 635 341 136
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.4 2.9 29.4
Approach LOS A A C
Timer: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Case No 6.0 12.0 8.0
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.6 10.1 43.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green (Gmax), s 39.1 41.9 39.1
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 5.2 3.8 5.3
Max Q Clear (g_c+l1), s 10.0 6.1 10.0
Green Ext Time (g_e), s 2.2 0.4 4.9
Prob of Phs Call (p_c) 1.00 0.87 1.00
Prob of Max Out (p_x) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Left-Turn Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 5 7 1
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 786 1468 0
Through Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 2 4 6
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1856 13 1475
Right-Turn Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 12 14 16
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 0 255 323
Left Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 5 0 7 0 1 0 0
300
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Assignment L L+T+R
Lanes in Grp 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 1 0 136 0 0 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 786 0 1736 0 0 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 8.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Sat Flow (s_l), veh/h/ln 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared LT Sat Flow (s_sh), veh/h/ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perm LT Eff Green (g_p), s 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Q Serve Time (g_ps), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time to First Blk (g_f), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre Blk (g_fs), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop LT Inside Lane (P_L) 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 589 0 182 0 0 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 589 0 1354 0 0 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 4.8 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 4.8 0.0 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Middle Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 0
Lane Assignment T
Lanes in Grp 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 1350 0 0 0 0 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 1350 0 0 0 0 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 301
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 0
Lane Assignment T+R
Lanes in Grp 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 635 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 0 0 0 0 1797 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), veh/h/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 1308 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 1308 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.0
HCM 7th LOS A
302
Section , Item C
303
Section , Item C
304
Section , Item C
305
Section , Item C
306
Section , Item C
307
Section , Item C
308
Section , Item C
309
Section , Item C
310
Section , Item C
311
Section , Item C
312
Section , Item C
313
Section , Item C
314
Section , Item C
315
Section , Item C
316
Section , Item C
317
Section , Item C
318
Section , Item C
319
Section , Item C
320
Section , Item C
321
Section , Item C
322
Section , Item C
323
Section , Item C
324
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 574 105 2 372 106 18
Future Volume (veh/h) 574 105 2 372 106 18
Number 6 16 5 2 7 14
Initial Q, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj (A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Lanes Open During Work Zone
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 624 114 2 404 115 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Opposing Right Turn Influence Yes Yes
Cap, veh/h 1111 203 519 1350 154 27
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Prop Arrive On Green 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.10 0.10
Unsig. Movement Delay
Ln Grp Delay, s/veh 0.0 5.1 5.7 3.1 29.4 0.0
Ln Grp LOS A A A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 738 406 136
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.1 3.1 29.4
Approach LOS A A C
Timer: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Case No 6.0 12.0 8.0
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.6 10.1 43.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green (Gmax), s 39.1 41.9 39.1
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 5.2 3.8 5.3
Max Q Clear (g_c+l1), s 12.2 6.1 12.1
Green Ext Time (g_e), s 2.6 0.4 6.0
Prob of Phs Call (p_c) 1.00 0.87 1.00
Prob of Max Out (p_x) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Left-Turn Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 5 7 1
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 714 1468 0
Through Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 2 4 6
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1856 13 1526
Right-Turn Movement Data
Assigned Mvmt 12 14 16
Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 0 255 279
Left Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 5 0 7 0 1 0 0
325
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Assignment L L+T+R
Lanes in Grp 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 2 0 136 0 0 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 714 0 1736 0 0 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 10.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Sat Flow (s_l), veh/h/ln 0 714 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared LT Sat Flow (s_sh), veh/h/ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perm LT Eff Green (g_p), s 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Q Serve Time (g_ps), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time to First Blk (g_f), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre Blk (g_fs), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop LT Inside Lane (P_L) 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 519 0 182 0 0 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 519 0 1354 0 0 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 5.7 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 5.7 0.0 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Middle Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 0
Lane Assignment T
Lanes in Grp 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 404 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 1350 0 0 0 0 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 1350 0 0 0 0 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 326
Section , Item C
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Lane Group Data
Assigned Mvmt 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 0
Lane Assignment T+R
Lanes in Grp 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Grp Vol (v), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 738 0 0
Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/ln 0 0 0 0 0 1805 0 0
Q Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), veh/h/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 1314 0 0
V/C Ratio (X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 1314 0 0
Upstream Filter (I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 1st-Term Q (Q1), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.1
HCM 7th LOS A
327
Section , Item C
328
Section , Item C
329
Section , Item C
330
Section , Item C
331
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Existing W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:10 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report M VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 322 614 348 263
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.64 0.49 0.61 0.40
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.8 25.8 5.7 22.3 5.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 12.8 25.8 5.9 22.3 5.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 88 64 93 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 229 173 212 51
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 726 713 1739 1239 1133
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 20 473 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.46 0.48 0.28 0.23
Intersection Summary
332
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Existing W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:10 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report M VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 155 7 517 254 250 118
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.26 0.05 0.75 0.64 0.63 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 34.0 21.6 37.3 14.8 33.4 33.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 34.0 21.6 37.3 14.8 33.4 33.1 9.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 46 3 35 99 97 24
Queue Length 95th (ft) 161 127 18 183 202 203 56
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 525 918 131 815 589 575 1325
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 21 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.17 0.05 0.63 0.43 0.45 0.09
Intersection Summary
333
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Existing W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:10 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report M VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 648 1164 271
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.70 0.36
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 15.3 6.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 11.0 15.3 6.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 172 12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 232 68
Internal Link Dist (ft) 137 175 183
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 3213 3213 757
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.36 0.36
Intersection Summary
334
Section , Item C
335
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Existing W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:55 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 241 562 413 216
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.56 0.45 0.65 0.33
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.1 25.8 5.2 21.2 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.1 25.9 5.4 21.2 5.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 66 59 106 9
Queue Length 95th (ft) 70 175 140 250 56
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 676 724 1740 1259 1124
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 21 489 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.34 0.45 0.33 0.19
Intersection Summary
336
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Existing W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:55 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 224 316 8 340 222 304 148
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.51 0.06 0.46 0.62 0.71 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 37.9 24.4 40.0 3.5 35.2 37.4 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 37.9 24.4 40.0 3.5 35.2 37.7 10.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 94 109 4 2 89 124 32
Queue Length 95th (ft) 207 251 20 28 192 #302 82
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 499 869 124 830 557 546 1258
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 37 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.36 0.06 0.41 0.40 0.60 0.12
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
337
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Existing W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 11:55 am 01/05/2026 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 958 927 234
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.65 0.30
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.6 15.2 6.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.6 15.2 6.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 131 125 16
Queue Length 95th (ft) 182 175 65
Internal Link Dist (ft) 137 175 183
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 3432 3432 779
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.27 0.30
Intersection Summary
338
Section , Item C
339
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Opening Year W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:12 pm 01/05/2 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 326 617 354 268
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.65 0.49 0.62 0.41
Control Delay (s/veh) 13.0 26.2 5.7 22.6 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 13.0 26.3 6.0 22.6 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 90 65 96 4
Queue Length 95th (ft) 76 234 176 218 54
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 723 705 1731 1225 1123
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 19 478 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.48 0.49 0.29 0.24
Intersection Summary
340
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Opening Year W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:12 pm 01/05/2 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 197 158 8 525 261 255 122
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.27 0.06 0.77 0.65 0.64 0.13
Control Delay (s/veh) 34.6 21.7 37.7 16.3 33.8 33.4 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 34.6 21.7 37.7 16.3 33.8 33.5 9.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 48 3 39 103 101 25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 166 129 19 #209 208 207 58
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 519 907 129 803 583 569 1310
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 21 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.17 0.06 0.65 0.45 0.47 0.09
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
341
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Opening Year W Project and AP Projects AM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:12 pm 01/05/2 Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 660 1186 275
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.71 0.37
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 15.2 6.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.9 15.2 6.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 178 12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 237 70
Internal Link Dist (ft) 137 175 183
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 3182 3182 752
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.37 0.37
Intersection Summary
342
Section , Item C
343
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Opening Year W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:18 pm 01/05/ Synchro 12 Report 2 VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 140 246 574 421 221
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.57 0.46 0.66 0.34
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.5 26.5 5.3 21.4 6.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.5 26.5 5.5 21.4 6.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 69 62 109 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 182 146 256 59
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 670 716 1730 1244 1113
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 21 490 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.35 0.46 0.34 0.20
Intersection Summary
344
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Opening Year W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:18 pm 01/05/ Synchro 12 Report 2 VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 228 321 9 347 227 310 151
v/c Ratio 0.65 0.52 0.07 0.47 0.63 0.72 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 38.6 24.6 40.6 3.9 35.8 38.1 10.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 38.6 24.6 40.6 3.9 35.8 38.5 10.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 114 4 4 92 128 33
Queue Length 95th (ft) 212 256 22 32 197 #313 85
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 493 859 123 821 550 540 1244
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 44 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.37 0.07 0.42 0.41 0.63 0.12
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
345
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Opening Year W Project and AP Projects PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 1:18 pm 01/05/ Synchro 12 Report 2 VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 975 943 238
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.65 0.31
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.7 15.2 6.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.7 15.2 6.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 127 18
Queue Length 95th (ft) 186 178 69
Internal Link Dist (ft) 137 175 183
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 3424 3424 773
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.31
Intersection Summary
346
Section , Item C
347
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Horizon WO AM 6:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 280 301 868 479 363
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.49
Control Delay (s/veh) 17.9 33.7 9.3 25.0 8.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 17.9 33.8 10.0 25.0 8.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 108 144 158 30
Queue Length 95th (ft) 114 #273 385 332 113
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 656 614 1615 1068 1011
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 18 414 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.51 0.72 0.45 0.36
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
348
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Horizon WO AM 6:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 277 166 10 555 378 334 176
v/c Ratio 0.75 0.29 0.10 0.94 0.81 0.78 0.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 44.9 23.5 41.0 42.0 45.5 44.1 9.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.5
Total Delay (s/veh) 44.9 23.5 41.0 42.0 45.5 47.8 10.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 144 62 6 166 199 174 46
Queue Length 95th (ft) #239 133 22 #384 #358 #304 79
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 420 733 105 618 473 460 1061
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 64 577
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.23 0.10 0.90 0.80 0.84 0.36
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
349
Section , Item C
Queues
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO AM 6:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group SET NWT NEL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 487 410 205
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.42 0.47
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 7.9 16.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 8.6 7.9 16.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 47 33
Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 112 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 105 473
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1810 1845 802
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.22 0.26
Intersection Summary
350
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO AM 6:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 4
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 836 1547 276
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.77 0.43
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 15.0 10.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 9.5 15.0 10.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 108 274 29
Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 350 107
Internal Link Dist (ft) 137 175 183
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2622 2622 635
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.59 0.43
Intersection Summary
351
Section , Item C
352
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 237 784 512 307
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.60 0.62 0.73 0.43
Control Delay (s/veh) 21.9 31.3 7.9 24.3 7.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 21.9 31.3 8.4 24.3 7.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 80 119 157 25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 105 195 282 338 94
Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 221 82
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 613 616 1657 1154 1056
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 435 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.39 0.64 0.44 0.29
Intersection Summary
353
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 276 11 455 327 350 221
v/c Ratio 0.78 0.46 0.10 0.73 0.80 0.80 0.23
Control Delay (s/veh) 47.0 24.7 41.5 17.1 46.1 44.7 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.7
Total Delay (s/veh) 47.0 24.7 41.5 17.1 46.1 49.6 12.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 158 108 6 77 164 178 59
Queue Length 95th (ft) #306 211 24 139 #323 #336 111
Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 410 758 105 653 429 473 1030
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 72 536
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.36 0.10 0.70 0.76 0.87 0.45
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
354
Section , Item C
Queues
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group SET NWL NWT NEL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 635 1 340 135
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.00 0.24 0.49
Control Delay (s/veh) 5.8 4.0 4.2 27.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 5.8 4.0 4.2 27.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 0 38 45
Queue Length 95th (ft) 179 2 80 84
Internal Link Dist (ft) 323 176 354
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75
Base Capacity (vph) 1362 527 1393 1160
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.00 0.24 0.12
Intersection Summary
355
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon WO PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 4
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1288 1166 215
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.67 0.33
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.7 15.2 14.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.7 15.2 14.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 225 192 46
Queue Length 95th (ft) 291 250 126
Internal Link Dist (ft) 70 145 135
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2696 2696 649
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.43 0.33
Intersection Summary
356
Section , Item C
357
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Horizon W AM 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 282 379 885 487 363
v/c Ratio 0.69 0.76 0.68 0.74 0.51
Control Delay (s/veh) 19.9 37.3 9.3 27.7 8.9
Queue Delay 0.0 1.4 1.1 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 19.9 38.7 10.4 27.7 8.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 149 155 184 35
Queue Length 95th (ft) 120 #385 410 341 116
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1373 221 600
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 612 561 1582 975 943
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 64 427 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.76 0.77 0.50 0.38
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
358
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Horizon W AM 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 277 196 10 650 380 340 177
v/c Ratio 0.76 0.35 0.10 1.08 0.82 0.77 0.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.9 41.0 80.6 46.6 43.0 9.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.6
Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 24.9 41.0 80.6 46.6 47.7 10.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 144 77 6 ~292 200 178 46
Queue Length 95th (ft) #239 158 22 #536 #359 #313 80
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1065 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 414 723 103 610 466 453 1044
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 63 577
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.27 0.10 1.07 0.82 0.87 0.38
Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
359
Section , Item C
Queues
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W AM 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group SET NWL NWT NEL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 522 1 503 206
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.00 0.54 0.43
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 6.0 10.2 14.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 10.5 6.0 10.2 14.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 0 67 32
Queue Length 95th (ft) 177 2 171 89
Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 952 316
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75
Base Capacity (vph) 1744 687 1774 1640
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.13
Intersection Summary
360
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W AM 2:56 pm 12/07/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 4
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 836 1547 282
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.77 0.45
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 15.0 12.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 9.5 15.0 12.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 108 274 38
Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 350 122
Internal Link Dist (ft) 507 649 419
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2622 2622 625
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.59 0.45
Intersection Summary
361
Section , Item C
362
Section , Item C
Queues
1: Merced Avenue & SR 99 NB Ramps 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group NWT NEL NET SWT SWR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 290 796 530 307
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.68 0.62 0.75 0.43
Control Delay (s/veh) 23.7 34.6 7.8 25.9 8.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 23.7 34.7 8.5 25.9 8.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 109 129 185 30
Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 #259 297 358 99
Internal Link Dist (ft) 911 221 195
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 100
Base Capacity (vph) 574 571 1609 1070 991
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 13 458 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.52 0.69 0.50 0.31
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
363
Section , Item C
Queues
2: Merced Avenue & Fowler Avenue/SR 99 SB Off Ramp 01/21/2026 Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 2
Lane Group SEL SET NWL NWR NET SWL SWT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 361 12 455 328 368 221
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.60 0.10 0.70 0.82 0.84 0.23
Control Delay (s/veh) 61.2 26.9 38.8 14.0 46.9 48.3 11.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.7
Total Delay (s/veh) 61.2 26.9 38.8 14.0 46.9 52.9 12.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 141 6 64 145 171 51
Queue Length 95th (ft) #356 270 25 99 #342 #395 124
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1260 548 221
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1000 1000 120
Base Capacity (vph) 343 659 122 653 418 438 987
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 33 493
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.55 0.10 0.70 0.78 0.91 0.45
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
364
Section , Item C
Queues
3: Fresno St & Fowler Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group SET NWL NWT NEL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 738 2 404 135
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.00 0.29 0.49
Control Delay (s/veh) 6.7 3.5 4.4 27.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 6.7 3.5 4.4 27.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 0 47 45
Queue Length 95th (ft) 232 2 98 84
Internal Link Dist (ft) 373 715 522
Turn Bay Length (ft) 75
Base Capacity (vph) 1366 448 1393 1160
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.00 0.29 0.12
Intersection Summary
365
Section , Item C
Queues
10: NB Off Ramp & Manning Ave 01/21/2026
Horizon W PM Horizon Year 2046 Plus Project Conditions 7:19 pm 02/05/2025 Mitigation Synchro 12 Report VRPA Technologies, Inc. Page 4
Lane Group EBT WBT NBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1288 1166 217
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.67 0.33
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.7 15.2 15.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.7 15.2 15.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 225 192 46
Queue Length 95th (ft) 291 250 128
Internal Link Dist (ft) 241 260 236
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 2696 2696 650
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.43 0.33
Intersection Summary
366
Section , Item C

APPENDIX F
Traffic Safety Analysis
367
Section , Item C
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105, Fresno, CA 93722 • Phone (559) 271-1200 • Fax (559) 271-1269 www.vrpatechnologies.com

TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PLANNING • PUBLIC OUTREACH

MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Chaney
Ventures 1021, LLC
FROM: Erik Ruehr
VRPA Technologies, Inc.

DATE: February 24, 2026
RE: TTM 6537 Transportation Impact Study
Traffic Safety Review
This traffic safety review is provided as part of a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) conducted for the TTM 6537 project in the City of Fowler. The project proposes to provide 199 single-family residential units on a proposed site located near the intersection of Fowler Avenue and Parlier Avenue. The Transportation Impact Study dated February 24, 2026 includes details regarding trip generation, trip distribution, project trips, roadway capacity analysis, and recommended roadway improvements.

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a traffic safety analysis for portions of the State highway system where the project would be expected to provide a substantial increase in trips. The remainder of the memorandum includes background information, a description of the methodology used, safety analysis, traffic operations analysis, and recommendations.

BACKGROUND
Based on the project’s TIS, project traffic is expected to contribute traffic to the following locations along the State highway system:
 SR 99/Merced Street Interchange
 SR 99/Manning Avenue Interchange
This memorandum provides a traffic safety analysis as described in the Caltrans February 2024 Local Development Review (LDR) Safety Review Practitioners Guide.

METHODOLOGY
The methodology for conducting the safety analysis can be summarized as follows:
 Roadway accident data for the SR 99 interchanges with Merced Street and Manning Avenue for the past three years was reviewed to determine whether there are any safety issues exist that could be corrected through traffic operational improvements. 368
Section , Item C
Michael Chaney
February 24, 2026

 Project traffic based on the TIS was reviewed to determine whether the addition of project traffic would add to the need for safety-related improvements.  Roadway capacity and queuing analysis from the TIS was used to analyze the context for future traffic growth and potential roadway improvements that relate to safety conditions.

SAFETY ANALYSIS
A Traffic Accident Surveillance and Accident Summary (TASAS) report and a Collision Data Summary were provided by Caltrans for on ramps and off ramps at the interchanges of SR 99 with Merced Street and Manning Avenue. The information was provided for the most recently available three-year period from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024 and the results are shown in Attachment A After reviewing the available information, the following conclusions were noted:
 There were no fatal accidents at any of the ramps and therefore, the average collision rates were below statewide averages for fatal accidents.
 When considering fatal plus injury collisions, the following locations had collision rates higher than statewide averages:
- SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Manning Avenue
- SR 99 Northbound On Ramp from Manning Avenue
- SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Merced Street/Fowler Avenue  When considering the total of fatal plus injury and property damage only accidents, the following locations had collision rates higher than statewide averages:
- SR 99 Southbound On Ramp from Manning Avenue
- SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Merced Street/Fowler Avenue Of the locations identified above, the following locations were screened out of additional analysis because the project would not make any physical modifications and the project results in zero additional trips:
- SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Manning Avenue
- SR 99 Northbound On Ramp from Manning Avenue
The following locations were not screened out and additional analysis is required:
- SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Merced Street/Fowler Avenue - SR 99 Southbound On Ramp from Manning Avenue
369
Section , Item C
Michael Chaney
February 24, 2026

For the ramps where further analysis is required, a review of the accident history was conducted.

Following is a summary:
 SR 99 Southbound Off Ramp to Merced Street/Fowler Avenue: The accidents at this location were 4 rear end accidents with speeding listed as the cause in each of the accidents. This is a relatively low level of accidents and not indicative of a correctable pattern. Signing and pavement markings on the off ramp were reviewed and considered to be adequate.

The project is expected to add 27 trips to this ramp in the AM peak hour and 78 trips to this ramp in the PM peak hour. The queuing analysis indicates that this off ramp will not experience any queues that would affect the SR 99 mainline. It is expected that the project traffic added to this intersection will not cause any changes in operation other than the addition of traffic. The accident risk per vehicle would be expected to remain at a fairly low rate as it is for existing conditions.

Although no increased accident risk has been noted, the City and Caltrans are pursuing the installation of a roundabout at this intersection and this would be expected to improve traffic safety.
 SR 99 Southbound On Ramp from Manning Avenue: The accidents at this location included 2 head on, 1 side swipe, and 1 overturn. Signing and pavement markings on the on ramp were reviewed and considered to be adequate.

The project is expected to add 15 trips to this ramp in the AM peak hour and 10 trips to this ramp in the PM peak hour. It is expected that the project traffic added to this intersection will not cause any changes in operation other than the addition of traffic. The accident risk per vehicle would be expected to remain at a fairly low rate as it is for existing conditions.

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
A detailed traffic operations analysis is provided in the project’s TIS. A summary is provided below:
 All intersections in the study area currently operate at level of service D or better.  With the addition of traffic growth from other sources and project traffic, four of the study area intersections are expected to experience level of service E or F conditions in the future: Merced Street/SR 99 Northbound Ramps, Merced Street/Fowler Avenue/Sumner Avenue/SR 99Southbound Ramps, Fowler Avenue/Fresno Street, and Manning Avenue/SR 99 Northbound Ramps.
 At the intersections of Manning Avenue/SR 99 Northbound Ramps and Fowler Avenue/Fresno Street, the TIS recommended that traffic signals be installed when warranted. 370
Section , Item C
Michael Chaney
February 24, 2026

 At the intersections of Merced Street/SR 99 Northbound Ramps and Merced Street/Fowler Avenue/Sumner Avenue/SR 99 Southbound Ramps, the TIS mentioned two alternatives: traffic signals and roundabouts. Traffic signals were expected to resolve the level of service deficiencies but they were also expected to result in queuing issues which would tend to have a negative effect on safety. The installation of roundabouts would be expected to resolve the level of service deficiencies and also result in safety improvements. The City of Fowler and Caltrans have conducted analyses separate for the TIS for this project and are actively pursuing the installation of roundabouts at these intersections.

RECOMMENDATIONS
The analysis described above leads to the following recommendations.  No mitigation is needed to address short-term safety concerns since the number of accidents experienced at study area intersections is relatively low and not indicative of correctable patterns. In addition, there were no safety concerns relating to queuing of traffic onto the freeway mainline at any of the study area intersections through the horizon year.  Roundabouts are the preferred improvement the intersections of Merced Street/SR 99 Northbound Ramps and Merced Street/Fowler Avenue/Sumner Avenue/SR 99 Southbound Ramps. It is recommended that the project applicant work with the City and Caltrans to support implementation of these improvements.

Please contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached by email at [email protected] or by phone at 858/361-7151.

371
Section , Item C
Michael Chaney
February 24, 2026

ATTACHMENT A

COLLISION REPORTS
372
Section , Item C
Michael Chaney
January 22, 2026

ATTACHMENT A

COLLISION REPORTS
373
Section , Item C
December 09, 2025
06-Fre-099
PM 008.932 to 011.376
1 Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS) Collision Data Summary
The data provided is protected by 23 U.S.C. § 407, and shall not be subject to discovery, nor admitted as evidence in any applicable legal proceeding against the State of California. By the release of this information, pursuant to subpoena or public records request, the State of California, Department of Transportation does not waive any rights it has under 23 U.S.C. § 407.

SR 099 PM 008.932 to PM 011.376
Table 1 summarizes ramp collision rates along State Route 099 (SR 099) between PM 008.932 and PM 011.376 in the County of Fresno. The Table B reports were generated on December 09, 2025, and they depict existing collision rates per million vehicles for the most recent 36-month period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024, from the Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS).

Table 1. 3-Year Collision Rates: Ramps

LOCATION
TOTAL
No. of
Collisions
ACTUAL
(per million vehicles)

AVERAGE
(per million vehicles)
Fatal
Collisions
Fatal +
Injury
Collisions
Total (1) Fatal
Collisions
Fatal +
Injury
Collisions
Total (1)

RAMPS AT MANNING AVE
PM 008.932
099/NB OFF TO

MANNING AVE
3 0.000 0.30 0.89 0.003 0.38 1.04
PM 008.979
099/SB ON FROM

MANNING AVE
4 0.000 0.00 1.31 0.002 0.23 0.63
PM 009.197
099/SB OFF TO

MANNING AVE
10 0.000 0.66 1.32 0.006 0.41 1.26
PM 009.348
099/NB ON FROM

MANNING AVE
4 0.000 0.24 0.49 0.002 0.23 0.63

RAMPS AT MERCED ST
PM 010.777
099/SB ON FROM

MERCED/FOWLER
0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.002 0.09 0.31
PM 010.891
099/NB OFF TO

MERCED ST
0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.38 1.04
PM 011.375
099/NB ON FROM

MERCED ST
0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.002 0.23 0.63
PM 011.376
099/SB OFF TO

MERCED/FOWLER
4 0.000 1.01 1.01 0.003 0.38 1.04
(1) All reported collisions (includes Property Damage Only (PDO) Collisions) 374
Section , Item C
December 09, 2025
06-Fre-099
PM 008.932 to 011.376
2 Note: Collision data may overlap between facility types, i.e. highway segments, intersections, and ramps. For details, refer to the Traffic Safety Investigation Handbook.

PM 008.932 099/NB OFF TO MANNING AVE
Analysis of the TASAS Table B record shows a total of 3 collisions (0-Fatal, 1-Injury, 2-PDO) at PM 008.932 at the ramp of 099/NB off to Manning Avenue for the study periods summarized above. Table 1 reflects that the Actual Fatal, Actual Fatal + Injury and Actual Total collision rates are below the average for similar facilities statewide.

Table 2. Highway Primary Collision Factors and Type of Collision Primary Collision
Factor
Type of Collision
Rear End Hit Object
Speeding 1
Other Violation 1
Other than Driver 1
Total 2 1
Table 2 shown above indicates that the predominant collision type was Rear End (2), and the corresponding collision factors were Speeding (1) and Other Violation (1). Another type of collision that occurred in this segment was Hit Object (1). Another type of pertinent primary collision factor was “Other than Driver”.

TASAS Table B shows that there was 1 Hit Object type of collisions. The Hit Object was “Traffic Sign/Signpost” (1).

PM 008.979 099/SB ON FROM MANNING AVE
Analysis of the TASAS Table B records shows a total of 4 collisions (0-Fatal, 0-Injury, 4-PDO) at PM 008.979 at the ramp of 099/SB on from Manning Avenue for the study periods summarized above. Table 1 reflects that the Actual Fatal and Actual Fatal + Injury collision rates are below the average for similar facilities statewide. It also reflects that the Actual Total collision rate is above the average for similar facilities statewide.

Table 3. Highway Primary Collision Factors and Type of Collision Primary Collision
Factor
Type of Collision
Head On Side Swipe Overturn
Improper Turn 1 1
Other Violation 1 1
Total 2 1 1
Table 3 shown above indicates that the predominant collision type was Head On (2), and the corresponding collision factors were Improper Turn (1) and Other Violation (1). Other types of collisions that occurred in this segment were Side Swipe (1) and Overturn (1).

TASAS Table B shows that there were 0 Hit Object type of collisions. 375
Section , Item C
December 09, 2025
06-Fre-099
PM 008.932 to 011.376
3 PM 009.197 099/SB OFF TO MANNING AVE
Analysis of the TASAS Table B records shows a total of 10 collisions (0-Fatal, 5-Injury, 5-PDO) at PM 009.197 at the ramp of 099/SB off to Manning Avenue for the study periods summarized above. Table 1 reflects that the Actual Fatal Collision rate is below the average for similar facilities statewide. It also reflects that the Actual Fatal + Injury and Actual Total collision rates are above the average for similar facilities statewide.

Table 4. Highway Primary Collision Factors and Type of Collision Primary Collision
Factor
Type of Collision
Side Swipe Rear End Hit Object Overturn Other
Influence of Alcohol 1 1
Improper Turn 1 1
Speeding 1 3
Other Violation 1 1
Total 1 1 3 4 1
Table 4 shown above indicates that the predominant collision type was Overturn (4), and the corresponding collision factors were Influence of Alcohol (1) and Speeding (3). Other types of collisions that occurred on this segment were Side Swipe (1), Rear End (1), Hit Object (3), and Other (1). Other types of pertinent primary collision factors were “Improper Turn” and “Other Violation”.

TASAS Table B shows that there were 3 Hit Object types of collisions. The Hit Objects were “Other Objects off the Road” (1), “Over Embankment” (1), and “Crash Cushion” (1).

PM 009.348 099/NB ON FROM MANNING AVE
Analysis of the TASAS Table B records shows a total of 4 collisions (0-Fatal, 2-Injury, 2-PDO) at PM 009.348 at the ramp of 099/NB on from Manning Avenue for the study periods summarized above. Table 1 reflects that the Actual Fatal and Actual Total Collision rates are below the average for similar facilities statewide. It also reflects that the Actual Fatal + Injury Collision rate is above the average for similar facilities statewide. 376
Section , Item C
December 09, 2025
06-Fre-099
PM 008.932 to 011.376
4 Table 5. Highway Primary Collision Factors and Type of Collision Primary Collision
Factor
Type of Collision
Rear End Hit Object
Influence of Alcohol 1 1
Improper Turn 2
Total 1 3
Table 5 shown above indicates that the predominant collision type was Hit Object (3), and the corresponding collision factors were Influence of Alcohol (1) and Improper Turn (2). Another type of collision that occurred in this segment was Rear End (1).

TASAS Table B shows that there were 3 Hit Object types of collisions. The Hit Objects were “Dike or Curb” (2) and “Over Embankment” (1).

PM 011.376 099/SB OFF TO MERCED/FOWLER
Analysis of the TASAS Table B records shows a total of 4 collisions (0-Fatal, 4-Injury, 0-PDO) at PM 011.376 at the ramp of 099/SB off to Merced/Fowler for the study periods summarized above. Table 1 reflects that the Actual Fatal and Total collision rates are below the average for similar facilities statewide. It also reflects that the Actual Fatal + Injury collision rate is above the average for similar facilities statewide.

Table 6. Highway Primary Collision Factors and Type of Collision Primary Collision
Factor
Type of Collision
Rear End
Speeding 4
Total 4
Table 6 shown above indicates that the predominant collision type was Rear End (4), and the corresponding collision factor was Speeding (4).

TASAS Table B shows that there were 0 Hit Object types of collisions.

End of summary.

KW/CW
377
Section , Item C
4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105, Fresno, CA 93722 • Phone (559) 271-1200 • Fax (559) 271-1269 www.vrpatechnologies.com

TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PLANNING • PUBLIC OUTREACH April 15, 2026
Soo Ho Park, City Engineer
City of Fowler
128 South 5th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
Re: TTM 6537 Traffic Analysis – Updated Fair Share Percentages Dear Soo Ho:

VRPA Technologies, Inc. (VRPA) recently completed a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the TTM 6537 project in the City of Fowler. The approved TIS is dated February 24, 2026.

The project’s TIS assumed the construction of 199 single-family dwelling units and this has since been changed to 179 single-family dwelling units. This reduces the project’s fair share percentages for various intersections affected by the project as shown in the attached table. Other than changing the fair share percentages, there is no need for any changes in the TIS. Although the traffic effects of the project are somewhat overstated in the traffic analysis, there would be no substantial changes in terms of mitigation measures or other results.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at [email protected] or by phone at (858) 361-7151.

Sincerely,
Erik Ruehr, P.E.

Director of Traffic Engineering
378
Section , Item C

INTERSECTION PEAK
HOUR

EXISTING PROJECT TRIPS HORIZON YEAR

PLUS PROJECT

FAIR SHARE

PERCENTAGE
AM 1,415 83 2,195 10.6%
PM 1,245 68 1,927 10.0%
AM 1,171 107 1,856 15.6%
PM 1,202 85 1,880 12.6%
AM 680 107 1,123 24.2%
PM 685 139 1,162 29.1%
AM 2,374 5 3,544 0.5%
PM 2,165 15 3,226 1.4%
TTM 6537 Transportation Impact Study
Project Fair Share Cost for Intersection Improvements

10. Manning Ave and SR 99 NB Off-Ramp

2. Merced Ave/Sumner Ave and SR 99 SB Off-Ramp

1. Merced Ave and SR 99 NB Ramps

3. Fresno St and Fowler Ave
Table 4-3 (Revised 4/1/26 for 179 Units)
379
Section , Item C
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-04

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER AMENDING

THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FOWLER TO REFLECT A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-05 and 345-100-04.

WHEREAS, Michael Chaney of 1021 Ventures LLC (“Applicant”), has proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537, as well as a request to prezone and annex Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 (“Project Site”) and 345-100- 04 (“Annexation Parcel”) to the City of Fowler (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project proposes to subdivide the Project site into 179 single-family residential lots, 2.41 acres of park land, and a 2-acre storm drainage basin, as well as other site improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises a 38.35-acre parcel, located at the northwest corner of East Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue, that is designated as Medium Low Density Residential (“MLDR”) by the City of Fowler General Plan, and is zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a density of 4.67 dwelling units per acre, which meets the density range of the MLDR land use designation; and WHEREAS, the Project site would be prezoned to the R-1-6 mapping zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-3 (Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the site’s MLDR land use designation; and
WHEREAS, to create a logical annexation boundary the Annexation Parcel would be prezoned to the R-1-10 (northern half) and R-1-7 (southern half) mapping zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-1 (Low Density Residential) and R-2 (Medium Low Density Residential), which is consistent with the Annexation Parcel’s Low Density Residential and MLDR split land use designation; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report and is absolved of further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15183; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Project at a regular meeting on March 5, 2026, and recommended that the City Council find that the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183, prezone the Project site R-1-6 with an R-3 implementing zone district, prezone the Annexation Parcel R-1-10 and R-1-7 with an implementing zone district of R-1 and R-2, initiate the annexation of the Project site and Annexation Parcel to the City of Fowler, approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45, and approve Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537; and 380
Section , Item C
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the April 10, 2026, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on April 21, 2026, the item was placed on the City Council agenda, but was continued to May 5, 2026, at the request of the Applicant; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on May 5, 2026, at 6:00pm, or as soon thereafter as the item could be heard, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, CEQA findings, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s regular meeting on May 5, 2026, including oral and written public testimony on the Project (“Administrative Record”), which is incorporated by this reference herein.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1
The City Council hereby finds that prezoning Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 to the R-1-6 (Single Family Residential) mapping zone district with an implementing zone district of R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and prezoning Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the R-1- 10 (Single Family Residential) and R-1-7 (Single Family Residential) mapping zone districts with an implementing zone district of R-1 (Low Density Residential) and R-2 (Medium Low Density Residential), respectively, satisfies each of the required findings for a prezone pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.110.070:
a. The Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the General Plan.
b. The Zoning Map Amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards to ensure compatibility with other established uses.
c. The Zoning Map Amendment provides reasonable property development rights while protecting environmentally sensitive land uses and species. d. The Zoning Map Amendment ensures protection of the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.

The bases for these findings are supported by the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing.

SECTION 2
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Fowler is hereby amended to designate Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 to the R-1-6 zone district, and Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-04 to the 381
Section , Item C
R-1-10 and R-1-7 zone district as indicated in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

SECTION 3
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days following its final passage and adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the ordinance, or a summary of the ordinance, shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of Fowler held on the 5th day of May, 2026, and passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ______ day of ______, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
___________________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
382
Section , Item C
Exhibit A
383
Section , Item C
RESOLUTION NO. 2831

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER, FINDING THAT PLANNING PROJECT NO. 25-44 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S

GENERAL PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15183, INITIATING ANNEXATION OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-05 AND 345-100-04, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2025-45, AND APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6537.

WHEREAS, Michael Chaney of 1021 Ventures LLC (“Applicant”), has proposed Tentative Parcel Map (“TPM”) No. 2025-45 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (“VTSM”) No. 6537, as well as a request to prezone and annex Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 (“Project Site”) and 345-100-04 (“Annexation Parcel”) to the City of Fowler (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project proposes to subdivide the Project site into 179 single-family residential lots, 2.41 acres of park land, and a 2-acre storm drainage basin, as well as other site improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises a 38.35-acre parcel, located at the northwest corner of East Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue, that is designated as Medium Low Density Residential (“MLDR”) by the City of Fowler General Plan, and is zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a density of 4.67 dwelling units per acre, which meets the density range of the MLDR land use designation; and WHEREAS, the proposed TPM would subdivide the Project site into two resulting parcels of 21.62 and 16.73 acres, respectively, and would be recorded prior to the Final Map of the VTSM to aid the phased development of the VTSM; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is the designated approval authority for TPMs, however pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section 9.30.080(C), the Community & Economic Development Director has elevated the approval authority for the TPM to the City Council so that each Project component has the same approval authority; and WHEREAS, the Project site would be annexed to the City of Fowler as a part of the Project; and
WHEREAS, to create a logical annexation boundary an additional parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-04) of approximately 37.76 acres in size, zoned AE-20 by the County of Fresno, and located at the southwest corner of East South Avenue and South Fowler Avenue – would be prezoned to the R-1-10 and R-1-7 mapping zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-1 (Low Density Residential) and R-2 (Medium Low Density Residential), which is consistent with the Annexation Parcel’s Low Density Residential and MLDR split land use designation, and annexed to the City of Fowler as a part of the Project; and 384
Section , Item C
WHEREAS, in addition to being annexed to the City of Fowler, Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 and 345-100-04 would annex to the Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District and would detach from the Kings River Resource Conservation District, Consolidated Irrigation District, and the Fresno County Fire Protection District as a part of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Fowler desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the CorteseKnox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Government Code Section 56000 for the proposed annexation; and WHEREAS, the Applicant and property owner of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-05 have applied for annexation of the subject property to the City of Fowler, the reorganization consists of a two parcels (the Project site and Annexation Parcel), and the territory proposed to be changed contains less than 12 registered voters and is considered uninhabited; and WHEREAS, an illustration of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto, and a map and written description accurately depicting said territory shall be forwarded to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County upon application; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the City of Fowler sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the City of Fowler does not desire to subject the proposal to additional terms or conditions; and
WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is intended to facilitate development of the Project site, constituting a logical expansion of the city limits; and WHEREAS, via adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-04 the Project will be prezoned consistent with its underlying General Plan land use designation, described above; and WHEREAS, City staff have determined that the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report as conditioned and is absolved of further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15183; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the April 10, 2026, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on March 5, 2026, at 6:30pm, the Fowler Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Project and voted to recommend that the City Council prezone the site as described above, approve a TPM for the Project site, approve a VTSM for the Project site, and initiate annexation of the Project site and Annexation Parcel; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on April 21, 2026, the item was placed on the City Council agenda, but was continued to May 5, 2026, at the request of the Applicant; and 385
Section , Item C
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on May 5, 2026, at 6:00pm, or as soon thereafter as the item could be heard, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, CEQA findings, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s regular meeting on May 5, 2026, including oral and written public testimony on the Project (“Administrative Record”), which is incorporated by this reference herein.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler, based upon the entire Administrative Record of proceedings, hereby resolves as follows:

1. That the City Council finds that the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report, as conditioned, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

2. This Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Fowler, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County is hereby requested to initiate proceedings for the change of organization/reorganization of territory as described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto, in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

3. That the City Council initiates annexation of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100- 05 and 345-100-04, directing the Community & Economic Development Director (or designee) to prepare and transmit the Annexation Proposal for Planning Project No. 25-44 to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County.

4. That the City Council requires the Applicant to prepare all necessary exhibits and pay for all fees related to the annexation of the Project site and Annexation Parcel.

5. That the City Council makes the following findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 for TPM No. 2025-45:
a. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.
b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.
386
Section , Item C
f. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

6. That the City Council makes the following findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 for VTSM No. 6537:
a. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.
b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.
f. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

7. The City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of the Project without the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit “B” to this Resolution.

8. The bases for these findings are detailed in the May 5, 2026, staff report, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing which are hereby incorporated by reference. 387
Section , Item C
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May 2026, at a regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Fowler by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Willians & Sorensen, LLP
388
Section , Item C
EXHIBIT “A”
389
Section , Item C
EXHIBIT “B”

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING PROJECT NO. 25-44
General Conditions

1. All conditions of approval shall be the sole financial responsibility of the Applicant, except where specified in the conditions of approval listed herein or mandated by statutes.

2. The Applicant shall submit to the City of Fowler Community & Economic Development Department a check in the amount necessary to file a Notice of Exemption at the Fresno County Clerk. This amount shall equal the Fresno County filing fee in effect at the time of filing. Such check shall be made payable to the Fresno County Clerk and submitted no later than three (3) days following action on Planning Project No. 25-44.

3. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45 shall be valid for a period not to exceed 24 months from the date of approval. Prior to expiration of the approved tentative map an extension or extensions to this period may be requested pursuant to Section 66453.3 of the Subdivision Map Act.

4. Approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 shall be valid for a period not to exceed 24 months from the date of approval. Prior to expiration of the approved tentative map an extension or extensions to this period may be requested pursuant to Section 66453.3 of the Subdivision Map Act.

5. Approval of Planning Project No. 25-44 shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the Applicant and/or the authorized representative, engineer, or surveyor to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property, the proposed use, and the submitted plans.

6. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the plans approved by the Approval Authority and the subject conditions contained herein. Minor modifications to the approved plans necessary to meet regulatory, engineering, or similar constraints may be made at the discretion of the City Planner and City Engineer without amendment to Tentative Parcel Map No. 2025-45 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537.

7. Any proposed signs are subject to review and approval by the City Planner by means of a separate Sign Review process.

8. It shall be the responsibility of the Applicant to ensure that any required permits, inspections, and approvals from any regulatory agency be obtained from the applicable agency prior to issuance of a building permit and/or the issuance of a certificate of completion, as determined appropriate by the City of Fowler Community & Economic Development Department.

9. All conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy approval for any portion of the Project.

Failure to comply with all conditions of approval shall be grounds for the imposition of penalties, suspension of the permit, modification of the permit, or revocation of the permit. 390
Section , Item C

10. The Applicant shall keep the exterior premises free of trash and debris. Graffiti shall be removed or covered within 48 hours of its discovery by the Applicant, manager, or any employee.

11. Approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 is not an authorization to commence construction. On- and off-site improvements, building construction, sign erection or occupancy shall not be permitted without prior approval of the City through issuance of any required grading or building permits.

12. A copy of these conditions must be kept on the premises of any sales office located within the boundary of the Project site and be shown to any requesting City official. Failure to comply with all conditions of approval shall be grounds for the imposition of penalties, modification of the permit, or revocation of the permit.

13. No use shall be permitted, and no process, equipment or materials shall be used that are found by the City to be objectionable to persons living or working in the vicinity by reasons of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination, glare, or unsightliness or to involve any hazard of fire or explosion.

14. The Project shall conform to the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zone district development standards. Any deviation from these standards shall result in the requirement for a variance or minor deviation.

15. All contractors or sub-contractors working in the City must obtain a business license from the Finance Department at Fowler City Hall. The Applicant shall report applicable sales tax revenue to the State.

16. The Applicant shall pay all fees as required by existing ordinances and schedules. The fees to be paid shall be those in effect at the time of payment.

17. New mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened from view.

18. Construction shall occur only between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm in accordance with Fowler Municipal Code section 5-21.601, subdivision (d).

19. The Applicant shall at all times hold all required permits and approvals from local, State, and federal agencies.

20. All water wells and septic systems existing on the property shall be abandoned to County, City, and State standards.

21. As many energy-conserving features as possible shall be included in the Project. Examples include, but are not limited to, increased wall and ceiling insulation, EPA-certified fireplace inserts and/or wood stoves or natural gas fireplaces, electrical and natural gas outlets installed around the exterior of the units to encourage use of electric yard maintenance equipment and gas-fired barbeques, and each home wired for computers/internet and electronic meter reading.
391
Section , Item C

22. To reduce construction noise, construction contracts shall require that all equipment be maintained according to the manufacturers’ specifications, and that noise-generating equipment be equipped with mufflers.

23. The developer shall provide concrete pads and walkways within the side yards adjacent to garages for the placement of trash/recycling containers behind the rear yard fences/gates.

All trash/recycling containers shall be placed out of public view except on the days of collection. The developer shall disclose this requirement to the future homeowners within the subdivision.

24. A 6-foot-high decorative block wall shall be constructed between residential lots and the street frontages of West Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue. Block walls shall be treated with an approved anti-graffiti coating, as approved by the City Engineer.

25. The Applicant is required to prepare and provide all necessary exhibits and pay for all fees related to annexation of the Project site and Annexation Parcel.

Lighting

26. All lighting shall be hooded and directed to not shine towards adjacent properties, public streets, and homes developed as a part of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537.

Lighting shall be approved by the City Engineer.

Landscaping Standards

27. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Fowler Zoning Ordinance Chapter

9.165.

28. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer for the areas along the public right of way.

29. Trees shall be provided every thirty (30) linear feet along the perimeter street frontages where a block wall is required and located a minimum of three (3) feet from the back of sidewalk. Such trees shall be planted at the midpoint between street trees spaced within the public right-of-way to provide alternating trees on either side of the sidewalk.

Aesthetics

30. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 shall comply with the Single-Family Residential Subdivision Design Standards contained in Section 9.120.060 of the Fowler Zoning Ordinance.

Fire Department

31. All dwellings shall be equipped with fire sprinklers.

32. Fire Flow shall not be less than 500 GPM at 20 PSI.

Engineering Conditions
General:

33. All proposals of the Applicant shall be conditions of approval, except as further modified below, and subject to modifications to conform to applicable City Standards. 392
Section , Item C

34. Crosswalks shall be provided to ensure pedestrian safety in areas determined by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community & Economic Development Director and these crosswalks shall be decorative such thermoplastic pavement striping and/or stamped and colored concrete.

35. The developer shall annex to the City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District, as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer.

Circulation:

36. The Applicant shall pay the Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee to the Fresno Council of Governments.

37. The Project shall pay its equitable fair share costs for the future construction of two roundabouts, which will be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of Caltrans and the City Engineer, at the intersections of Merced Street and State Route 99 southbound offramp and Merced Street and State Route 99 northbound on- and off-ramps. The equitable fair share cost for improvements at each of these two intersections will be 15.6% (southbound) and 10.6% (northbound).

38. The Project shall pay its equitable fair share costs for traffic mitigation for the Project’s impacts to the intersection of Fresno Street and Fowler Avenue. The Project’s equitable fair share of costs for improvements at the intersection is 29.1%.

39. The Project shall pay its equitable fair share costs for traffic mitigation for the Project’s impacts to the intersection of Manning Avenue and State Route 99 northbound off-ramp.

The Project’s equitable fair share of costs for improvements at the intersection is 1.4%.

40. Street pavement section shall be a minimum structural section as indicated in City Standard drawings and verified by a Project soils report.

41. Traffic and street signs shall be installed by the Applicant in accordance with City requirements.

42. The Applicant shall construct the western half of South Fowler Avenue along the Project’s South Fowler Avenue frontage.

43. The Applicant shall construct the northern half of West Parlier Avenue along the Project’s West Parlier Avenue frontage.

44. The Project shall not result in excessive queuing lengths to occur at the State Route 99 ramps along Merced Street, nor shall it result in the excessive queuing lengths for the Merced Street turn pockets underneath State Route 99. If queue lengths are determined to be excessive, as confirmed by Caltrans, the Applicant shall consult with Caltrans on adequate mitigation measures to be implemented to address the excessive queue lengths and shall implement those mitigations measures.

It is anticipated that the Traffic Study attached to the Project’s March 5th, 2026, Planning Commission staff report is the final version of the Traffic Study, however should Caltrans require mitigation measures to address queuing concerns as described above, the Traffic Study shall be updated to reflect these Mitigation Measures.

Grading and Drainage:
393
Section , Item C

45. A Grading and Site Improvement Plan for the proposed on-site improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall obtain a Grading and Site Improvement Permit once plans are approved. Improvement plans shall indicate drainage calculations for the subdivision demonstrating that the proposed on-site storm drainage basin is adequate in size to accommodate runoff generated by the Project.

The proposed storm drainage basin must be sized to retain drainage associated with Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 during a 100-year storm event.

46. The proposed storm drainage basin shall include perimeter fencing with privacy slats (tan color).

47. The Applicant’s engineer shall submit a storm drain plan and hydraulic calculations showing location of inlets, manholes, and pipelines (including sizing) to City Engineer for review and approval prior to preparation of improvement plans.

48. The Applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The plan shall provide for the mitigation of soil erosion from the project site during the construction and warranty periods and be submitted to the City prior to the start of construction. Applicant shall supply City with the approved SWPPP and WDID number.

Water/Sewer:

49. A looped water system shall be developed within the subdivision and be tested and accepted by the City of Fowler Public Works Department. Each lot shall be equipped a water meter/box meeting City standards.

50. The Project shall extend the existing water main at the intersection of West South Avenue and South Fowler Avenue to serve the Project. The extended water main shall be a 12-inch water main along the full extent of its South Fowler Avenue and West Parlier Avenue street frontages. Any costs for this extension in excess of the Project’s contribution would be reimbursed to the Applicant through a fair share reimbursement agreement entered into with the City

51. All interior water mains shall be an 8-inch water main and loop within each phase of development. The completed interior water system shall be connected to the 12-inch water mains in the South Fowler Avenue and West Parlier Avenue at each entrance street.

52. Well No. 9 must be online prior to the Final Map being presented to City Council for approval, and staff shall present the water pressure readings for Well No. 9 once available and confirm the readings show that Well No. 9 sufficiently meets the water supply and water pressure requirements, including the maximum daily demand and fire flows, at the time the Final Map is presented to the City Council for approval.

53. Fire hydrants shall be installed at 300-foot intervals at the locations specified by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. Hydrant spacing shall not exceed 500 feet of hose laydown.

54. Two water sample stations shall be installed within the subdivision at the locations specified by the Public Works Director.

55. The Applicant is required to comply with all conditions of the Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District (“SKF”). This includes:

A. The Project site must be annexed to the City and SKF. 394
Section , Item C
B. Completion and submittal of a subdivision connection application to SKF.

C. Schedule a pre-design meeting with SKF for sanitary sewer improvement requirements.

D. Submit a full set of subdivision plans to SKF for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6537 for plan check.

E. The Applicant must pay for the annexation, sewer connection and plan check/inspection fees prior to the issuance of a building permit.

56. The Applicant shall extend the existing 15-inch gravity main located at the intersection of West South Avenue and South Fowler Avenue to the intersection of West Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue. The Applicant shall also construct a new 10-inch sewer main along the Project’s West Parlier Avenue frontage to the intersection of West Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue. Any costs for the extension and construction of these sewer mains in excess of the Project’s contribution would be reimbursed to the Applicant through a fair share reimbursement agreement entered into with the City. The sewer main extension within South Fowler Avenue shall meet the minimum clearance requirement required by Consolidated Irrigation District for the sewer main to avoid conflict with the Kirby Canal.

57. The Applicant shall upsize approximately 77 feet of sewer main running from the intersection of West South Avenue and South Fowler Avenue westward. The cost for this upsizing will be completely reimbursed to the Developer as a part of a reimbursement agreement entered into with the City of Fowler.

58. The SKF Collection System Master Plan notes a planned pump station at the northeast corner of the Project site. The City, Developer, and SKF have coordinated on the need for this pump station – if the Project’s Final Map shows grades that are adequate to meet SKF’s minimum requirements, a pump station will not be required to be constructed to serve this Project. Should the grades on the Final Map not be adequate to meet SKF’s minimum requirements, a pump station will be required to be constructed to serve the Project. If the pump station is required to be constructed, any costs for the construction of this pump station in excess of the Project’s contribution would be reimbursed through a fair share reimbursement agreement entered into with the City of Fowler.

59. The City will be upgrading the South Avenue Lift Station as a CIP project. Should the ultimate buildout of the upgraded lift station not be able to be funded completely by City funds, the remainder of the buildout of the lift station will be funded by developer fair share contributions. If when the Final Map for the Project is approved the upgraded lift station no longer has remaining capacity to serve the Project, then the Applicant shall be responsible for paying the Project’s fair share contribution of the remaining expansion of the lift station to its ultimate buildout.

60. Vesting Tentative Map No. 6537 shall meet all standards and requirements of SKF.

Utilities:

61. All existing overhead utilities along the frontage of the subdivision shall be undergrounded, as confirmed by the City Engineer.

62. All new electric, cable TV, telephone, internet, etc. services provided to the development shall be underground.
395
Section , Item C

63. The Applicant shall provide a street light plan for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction.

Streetlights shall be provided by the Developer and maintained by the City pursuant to PG&E rate schedule LS2C.

64. The Applicant shall work with PG&E for the preparation of a utility plan, subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction. All work shall be completed such that no street surface need be reopened for service.

65. The existing Consolidated Irrigation District canal running through the subject property shall be relocated along the northern and western boundaries of the Project site and shall be undergrounded. A 30-foot easement shall be dedicated to Consolidated Irrigation District for maintenance purposes along the new canal alignment. No structures may be located on top of this easement. The Applicant shall be responsible for coordinating directly with Consolidated Irrigation District on the design and proposed improvements related to the canal.

Final Map:

66. The design and improvement of the subdivision shall conform to Titles 1 through 15 of the City of Fowler Subdivision Ordinance and to the City of Fowler Standard Specifications (“Standard Specifications”) unless otherwise specified in these conditions.

67. The Applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City if the Final Map is approved prior to completion and acceptance of the public improvements.

68. A right-to-farm covenant shall be recorded prior to recordation of the Final Map.

69. Lots backing onto West Parlier Avenue and South Fowler Avenue shall have no access to said streets.

70. The Project’s storm drainage basin shall be developed as a part of Phase 1 in a manner that accommodates any storm drainage generated from the development of Phase 1. The storm drainage basin need only be constructed to serve homes from Phase 1, during Phase 1. The remainder of the basin serving homes during subsequent phases may be developed in a manner that serves each subsequent phase. This does not preclude the Applicant from constructing the entirety of the storm drainage basin during Phase 1.

71. The Project’s proposed park land shall be developed proportionate to the acreage developed in each phase, regardless of which phase of development the park land is located in, as confirmed by the City Engineer.

72. Street names shall be verified by City staff prior to finalizing the final map. Street names shall be consistent with streets along similar alignments throughout the City. Street naming shall comply with Section 7-5.04 of the Fowler Municipal Code.

73. All development fees in effect at the time of permitting shall be applied to the development of this subdivision, including plan check, map, development, school and park fees, and all connection fees for sewer and water.
396
Section , Item C
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

74. The Applicant shall consult with and shall comply with the requirements of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, including but not limited to compliance with Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) and Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review).

Other

75. Approval of this Project is for the benefit of the Applicant. The submittal of applications by Applicant for this Project was a voluntary act on the part of the Applicant not required by the City. Therefore, as a condition of approval of this Project, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Fowler and its agents, officers, consultants, independent contractors and employees (“City”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City concerning the Project, including any challenges to associated environmental review, and for any and all costs, attorneys fees, and damages arising therefrom (collectively “Claim”).

The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing in this condition shall obligate the City to defend any Claim and the City shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by the City, unless the City approves the settlement in writing. Nor shall the City be prohibited from independently defending any Claim, and if the City does decide to independently defend a Claim, the Applicant shall be responsible for City’s attorneys’ fees, expenses of litigation and costs for that independent defense, including the costs of preparing any required administrative record. Should the City decide to independently defend any Claim, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim unless the Applicant approves the settlement.

Signature of Applicant: ________________________________ Dated: ________________
397
Section , Item C

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: May 5, 2026
FROM: SOO HO PARK, City Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDER approving Resolution No. 2832 for project list of SB 1 Local Streets and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds for fiscal year 2026-27. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2832.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt Resolution No. 2832 to designate 5
th Street from Main Street to Vine Street as the 2026-
27 SB 1 Local Streets and Roads project.

BACKGROUND
Senate Bill 1 (SB 1),the Road Repair and Accountability Act, was passed by the California State Legislature in April 2017. As part of SB 1, specific transparency and accountability provisions must be met to ensure that the public is aware of the projects that have been completed utilizing SB 1 funds. By July 1st, the City of Fowler must adopt an annual resolution that lists the project that will be funded for the following year.

The project recommended is the resurfacing of 5
th Street from Main Street to Vine Street. With
the amount projected for FY2026-27, the City is estimated to have a minimum RMRA fund total of $215,125 which includes previously unused funds with interest.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
“This action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.”

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:
398
Section , Item D
General Plan Goal MOB-1
Fowler’s streets are a safe and enjoyable environment for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and people of all ages and abilities.

General Plan Goal MOB-11
Ensure street and road projects are adequately designed to accommodate safe and convenient pedestrian and bicyclist access.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of the project and the resolution will allow the City to maintain eligibility to receive 2026-27 SB1 funding.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
No procurement is associated with this action.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.

Attachments
- Resolution No. 2832
399
Section , Item D
RESOLUTION NO. 2832

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER
APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 TO BE FUNDED

BY ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT REVENUES IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 (SB 1)
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (“SB 1”), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions to ensure the residents of the City of Fowler (“City”) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (“RMRA”), created by SB 1, in the City budget, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $215,125 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth (10th) year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities and the project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate one (1) street within the City this year and similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2022 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an “poor” condition. This revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure, with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets 400
Section , Item D
infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fowler, California, that:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following proposed and adopted project will be funded in-part or solely with fiscal year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Description Location Estimated
Useful
Life
Estimated Project
Schedule
5 th Street
Rehabilitation
Resurface Roadway 5
th Street from
Main Street to Vine
Street
15-20 Yr JULY 2026 – JUNE
2027
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May 2026, at a regular meeting of the Fowler City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Meija, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:____________________________
ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
401
Section , Item D